File No. 70-10079
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Amendment No. 2
to
APPLICATION
on
FORM U-1/A
under the
PUBLIC UTILITY HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1935 ("Act")
-------------------------------------------
FIRSTENERGY CORP.
76 South Main Street
Akron, Ohio 44308
OHIO EDISON COMPANY
76 South Main Street
Akron, Ohio 44308
The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company
76 South Main Street
Akron, Ohio 44308
The Toledo Edison Company
76 South Main Street
Akron, Ohio 44308
Pennsylvania Power Company
1 E. Washington Street
P.O. Box 891
New Castle, PA 16103
Metropolitan Edison Company
2800 Pottsville Pike
Reading, PA 19640-0001
Pennsylvania Electric Company
1001 Broad Street
Johnstown, PA 15907
Jersey Central Power & Light Company
Madison Avenue at Punch Bowl Road
Morristown, NJ 07060-9871
American Transmission Systems, Incorporated
76 South Main Street
Akron, Ohio 44308
(Names of companies filing this statement and
addresses of principal executive offices )
------------------------------------------
FIRSTENERGY CORP.
76 South Main Street
Akron, Ohio 44308
(Name of top registered holding company,
parent of each applicant or declarant)
-------------------------------------------
Leila L. Vespoli Douglas E. Davidson, Esq.
Senior Vice President Thelen Reid & Priest LLP
and General Counsel 40 West 57th Street
FirstEnergy Corp. New York, New York 10019
76 South Main Street
Akron, Ohio 44308
(Names and addresses of agents for service)
-------------------------------------------
2
The Application filed in this proceeding on August 13, 2002 and amended by
Amendment No. 1, filed in this proceeding on November 14, 2002 is hereby amended
and restated in its entirety to read as follows:
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED TRANSACTION.
-----------------------------------
A. FirstEnergy Corp., an Ohio corporation ("FirstEnergy"), a registered
holding company under the Act, holds, directly or indirectly1, of all of the
outstanding common stock of seven electric utility operating subsidiaries ---
Ohio Edison Company, a holding company exempt by order under section 3(a)(2)
from all provisions of the Act except section 9(a)(2)2 ("Ohio Edison"), The
Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, The Toledo Edison Company, American
Transmission Systems, Incorporated , Jersey Central Power & Light Company,
Metropolitan Edison Company, Pennsylvania Electric Company, and Pennsylvania
Power Company (collectively, the "Applicants"). The Applicants' combined service
areas encompass approximately 37,200 square miles in Ohio, New Jersey and
Pennsylvania. The areas they serve have a combined population of approximately
11.0 million. By this Application, the Applicants hereby request authorization
pursuant to Section 9(c)(3) of the Act to invest, directly or through
subsidiaries, in one or more low-income housing projects that qualify or will
qualify for tax credits under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code ("Code")
and historic building or other qualified rehabilitation projects that qualify or
will qualify for tax credits under Section 47 of the Code (collectively, "Tax
Credit Projects").
B. By Order dated October 29, 2001 (HCAR No. 27459) (the "Merger Order"),
the Commission authorized, among other things, the merger between FirstEnergy
and GPU, Inc. ("GPU"), a Pennsylvania corporation. The merger became effective
on November 7, 2001, with FirstEnergy being the surviving entity. In the Merger
Order, the Commission also authorized, among other things, FirstEnergy and its
subsidiaries to retain investments then held by FirstEnergy in low income
housing properties that qualify for Low Income Housing Tax Credits ("LIHTC")
under Section 42 of the Code. As of December 31, 2001, FirstEnergy and its
subsidiaries collectively held passive LIHTC investments totaling approximately
$102 million in various separate limited partnerships or limited liability
companies (LLCs) that own and manage low-income housing properties. Each LIHTC
investment has been made by Ohio Edison or FirstEnergy. Neither FirstEnergy nor
any of its subsidiaries has made any further such investments since the merger.
Neither FirstEnergy nor any of its subsidiaries participates actively in the
development, management, or operation of these properties. In each case,
responsibility for the day-to-day management of these ventures resides in the
general partner or managing member of the venture (in the case of LLCs)3 or in
an independent management company.
--------------------
1 Ohio Edison, The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, The Toledo Edison
Company, American Transmission Systems, Incorporated , Jersey Central Power
& Light Company, Metropolitan Edison Company and Pennsylvania Electric
Company are direct subsidiaries of FirstEnergy and Pennsylvania Power
Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ohio Edison.
2 HCAR No. 21019 (April 26, 1979).
3 State LLC statutes typically allow the members of an LLC to provide for the
management of the LLC by a managing member. See, e.g., Delaware Limited
Liability Company Act, Section 18-402. As indicated below, Applicants
represent that they will invest in LLCs only as a non-managing member, and
that their rights (including consent rights) under the relevant membership
agreement will be no greater than the rights typically accorded limited
partners under a limited partnership statute.
3
Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a list of LIHTC project investments
currently held by FirstEnergy and its subsidiaries, and the aggregate investment
in such projects as of December 31, 2001.
C. Proposal to Invest in Additional Projects . Applicants, directly or
-------------------------------------------
through one or more subsidiaries, propose to invest an aggregate of up to $100
million from time to time through December 31, 2005 in existing or new LIHTC
projects located anywhere within the United States and historic building or
other qualified rehabilitated building projects ("Section 47 Projects") located
within the service territories of the Applicants (collectively, "Tax Credit
Projects") that qualify or are expected to qualify for the Federal and/or State
tax credits. Applicants are requesting authority to invest in the Tax Credit
Projects both directly and indirectly because FirstEnergy's non-utility
subsidiaries may not have income sufficient to take full advantage of the tax
credits generated by an investment in such Tax Credit Projects. FirstEnergy will
cause all tax credits earned by any "subsidiary" to be directed to that
subsidiary in the year in which such tax credits are earned and will cause the
tax allocation agreement to be entered into by and among FirstEnergy and its
public utility company subsidiaries for the 2002 tax year to provide as such.
As in the past, Applicants will not take any active role in the
development, management or operation of any Tax Credit Project and will not
acquire any interest in any venture holding a Tax Credit Project if, as a result
thereof, such venture would become an "affiliate," as defined under Section
2(a)(11) of the Act, of FirstEnergy. Accordingly, Applicants will invest in such
ventures as a limited partner in one or more limited partnerships and/or as a
non-managing member in one or more LLCs, with rights that are substantially the
same as rights typically accorded limited partners under limited partnership
statutes.4 Further, in each case, responsibility for the day-to-day management
--------------------
4 Under limited partnership statutes that have been adopted in most states,
limited partners may not participate in the control of the business of the
partnership without risking becoming liable to third parties for the
obligations of the partnership. See, e.g., Delaware Revised Uniform Limited
Partnership Act, as amended 2001 ("DRULPA"), Section 17-303(a). However,
such statutes typically provide that specified actions by a limited partner
will not constitute participation in the control of the business of the
partnership, such as consulting with the general partner, requesting
meetings of the partnership, or exercising the right to consent to limited
number of actions by the partnership that could affect the limited
partners' rights. See, e.g., DRULPA, Section 17-303(b). Consistent with
consent rights that may be exercised by limited partners under any
applicable limited partnership statute, Applicants anticipate that, as a
limited partner, they would typically have the right to approve all or some
of the following actions: the dissolution and winding up of the
partnership; any sale, exchange or mortgage of partnership assets; the
admission of new partners; the incurrence or renewal of any indebtedness of
the partnership; any change in the nature of the business of the
partnership; any amendment to the partnership agreement; a merger or
consolidation; indemnification of any partner; and any transaction
involving an actual or potential conflict of interest. Such approval rights
are necessary and appropriate in order to enable limited partners to
protect their interests in the partnership. Applicants represent that their
rights (including consent rights) as non-managing members in any
manager-managed LLC will be no greater that those of a limited partner in a
limited partnership.
4
of these ventures (including leasing activities, rent collection and property
maintenance) will reside in the general partner or managing member of the
venture (in the case of LLCs) or in an independent management company.
Applicants commit that they will dispose of their ownership interest in each Tax
Credit Project upon becoming fully vested in the tax credits, including any
state credits.
Typically, Tax Credit Projects are initiated by developers who then sell
the project to a sydicator who packages multiple LIHTC properties into a
portfolio and then offers the Tax Credit Project as a limited partnership or a
manager-managed LLC to investors. A separate limited partnership or
manager-managed LLC is established for each new qualifying Tax Credit Project.
In general, the syndicator conducts the due diligence on the properties from an
investment perspective, structures the lower-tier limited partnerships, provides
and/or arranges for financing, structures guarantees with developers and
continues to oversee each Tax Credit Project as the general partner.
Applicants currently expect to make substantially all of their investments
in each case through limited partnerships. The day to day management functions
of these limited partnerships will be conducted by the syndicator, as the
general partner. This structure will allow Applicants to finance each Tax Credit
Project on a stand-alone basis under the control of an unaffiliated third party,
insulate each investment property from any liabilities that may arise in
connection with the development or management of any other Tax Credit Project,
and facilitate compliance with the requirements of Sections 42 of the Code (as
applicable to low income housing properties) and Section 47 of the Code (as
applicable to certified historic structures and other qualified rehabilitated
buildings).
Applicants will continue to undertake appropriate due diligence activities
in connection with such investments and manage such investments in order to
protect the tax credits that each Tax Credit Project is entitled to and to
assure that the physical properties are properly maintained. These activities
will include reviewing and analyzing financial statements generated by the
general partners, managing member or third-party property manager against the
approved budget for the investments and conducting due diligence assessments to
determine that the properties remain in compliance with the provisions of all
applicable Federal and State regulations. Investment management in this context
may also include on-site inspections to determine that the physical structures
and grounds are maintained as quality affordable housing.
Opportunities to invest in a specific Tax Credit Project, directly or
through investments in syndicated funds, are evaluated by FirstEnergy's
5
Investment Management Department in conjunction with the Tax Department on a
case-by-case basis. The financial analysis considers the future cash flows
related to the capital contribution made and the expected tax credits that will
be earned by the partnership or LLC over the term of the investment. Since each
investment is analyzed on a case-by-case basis, this economic analysis is
modified to account for differing assumptions.
The risk management analysis is conducted on two levels, by FirstEnergy and
the by the syndicator. FirstEnergy manages its risk exposure by reviewing the
performance of the properties and the syndicators prior to committing to an
investment. FirstEnergy invests solely with large syndicators who have
substantial experience in acquiring qualified properties and monitoring their
operations and compliance with tax rules. Such syndicators typically acquire
properties during their development or construction phase after performing
significant due diligence on those properties including, but not limited to,
review of market research to ensure that enough tenant demand exists in the
immediate area to support the project; review of the construction and financing
plans; and review of the property management team. FirstEnergy decision to
invest is based on a review of the market research data, the property's
projected cash flows and tax credits. To manage risk as the project progresses,
syndicators will commit to an investment and base the actual equity funding
around specific development milestones such as the receipt of a mortgage
commitment; completion of construction; receipt of a Certificate of Occupancy;
funding of the mortgage; and achievement of qualified occupancy. In addition the
syndicator will require the property's general partner to fund operating and
maintenance reserves and make certain guarantees such as timely construction
completion and delivery of projected levels of tax credits. If the general
partner cannot deliver the guarantees, then adjustments are made to the amount
of the equity investment to maintain the property's yield. On an on-going basis
the syndicator monitors the operation and tax compliance of the properties and
takes whatever measures necessary to ensure the property's continuing viability.
FirstEnergy reviews the quarterly financial statements and property status
reports to ensure that the syndicator and general partners are performing their
duties adequately.
As described above, this Application does not seek approval to invest in
any specific partnership or LLC, but rather seeks general approval for the
investment of up to an aggregate of $100 million in (a) LIHTC projects located
anywhere in the United States or its territories and (b) Section 47 Projects
located within the service territories of the Applicants during the period
through December 31, 2005. The requested amount of investment authority is
consistent with FirstEnergy's 5-year forecast as shown on Exhibit I, which the
Applicants will update on an annual basis through the filing of certificates
pursuant to Rule 24.
D. Description of LIHTC Program. The LIHTC program has provided the
------------------------------
Applicants a major incentive to invest in low-income housing projects by
generating a stream of tax credits that reduce Applicants' federal and state
income tax liability. Generally, the owner of a qualified LIHTC property must
agree to rent the units to persons with sufficiently low incomes as defined in
Section 42 of the Code for at least fifteen years. In this way, the LIHTC
program has resulted in the creation of a substantial amount of affordable
housing. Applicants believe that there is a continuing need for affordable
housing throughout the United States, and thus seeks authorization to make
6
additional investments in LIHTC properties. Each state has an annual allocation
of federal tax credits under Section 42 of the Code in the amount of $1.25 per
capita. Tax credits are allocated annually in a competitive process, so there is
no way to predict which housing projects will be awarded credits in any given
year.
Under the LIHTC program, equal annual tax credits are available over a
ten-year period payable over eleven years, with the first and last years
prorated. Under Section 42(h)(6)(A) of the Code, no credit is allowed for any
taxable year unless an agreement between the housing project owner and the
applicable state housing credit agency is in effect as of the end of such
taxable year. Furthermore, pursuant to Sections 42(h)(6)(B)(i), 42(h)(6)(D) and
42(h)(6)(E)(ii) of the Code, such an agreement must prohibit any increase in
gross rent for a period ending on the later of (a) the date specified by such
agency in the agreement or (b) 15 years after the date when the building is
placed in service. Thus, even though the flow of tax credits for an LIHTC
property stops after ten years, the property remains subject to rent and income
restrictions for at least fifteen years.
Based on the requirements of Section 42 of the Code, the limitations
imposed by state housing credit agencies on LIHTC properties and market
conditions, Applicants would expect to hold their respective investment
interests in each Tax Credit Project for a period of 15 to 17 years to protect
their investment in the property.
E. Description of Historic Structures and Rehabilitated Buildings Tax
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Credit Program (Section 47 Projects). Likewise, Applicants would earn tax
----------------------------------------
credits under Section 47 of the Code through investments in "certified historic
structures" (defined as structures that are either listed in the National
Register or located in a registered historic district and certified by the
Secretary of the Interior as being of historic significance), as well as other
types of "qualified rehabilitated buildings" (which could include apartment and
office buildings, factories, warehouses, etc.) that were first placed in service
before 1936. This program was designed to rehabilitate and extend the usefulness
of historic structures in order to preserve a sense of history and retain our
architectural heritage and character (in the case of "certified historic
structures") and to materially extend the useful life and/or significantly
upgrade the usefulness of other types of buildings (in the case of "qualified
rehabilitated buildings"). The tax credit is based on the qualified
rehabilitation expenditures, as defined under the Code and regulations. It is
equal to 20% in the case of "certified historic structures" and 10% in the case
of other rehabilitated buildings. These credits are subject to possible
recapture if the rehabilitated property is transferred before five years after
it is placed in service. In addition to the federal tax credits, FirstEnergy may
also qualify for tax credits that are available under state law with respect to
investments in historic building rehabilitation projects.
F. Benefits of Investing in the LIHTC and Historic Structures and
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rehabilitated Buildings Tax Credit Programs. Applicants have chosen to invest in
-------------------------------------------
the LIHTC and Historic Structures and Rehabilitated Buildings Tax Credit
Programs because of the nature of the programs. The programs were initiated to
address the growing need for affordable housing in the United States and to
encourage the private sector to apply their skills and resources to develop and
operate these properties in a more efficient manner than they had been run
previously. Applicants believe that by investing in LIHTC Projects and Rule 47
7
Projects that they can earn an adequate level of return with low risk while
helping meet a significant social need.
G. Reports Pursuant to Rule 24.
---------------------------
FirstEnergy will file certificates of notification pursuant to Rule 24
within 45 days after the end of each six-month period, commencing with the
period ending June 30, 2003, with the first filing covering the period from
issuance of this order until June 30, 2003 and shall include the following with
respect to each Applicant:
a. the consolidated balance sheet and twelve-month statement of income as
of the end of the six month period;
b. the amount of revenues and any form of compensation received during each
six-month period ending June 30 or December 31 as applicable, from any and all
Tax Credit Projects directly or indirectly owned;
c. the name of each new Tax Credit Project company in which an investment
was made during the six-month period and upon staff request a copy of the
applicable operating agreement;
d. the amounts of investment made during each six-month period in the Tax
Credit Projects and cumulative comparisons of the $100 million requested to be
authorized by this Application; and
e. the cumulative number of any and all Tax Credit Projects, and any other
investment position in any form of nonutility assets at the end of each
six-month period.
ITEM 2. FEES, COMMISSIONS AND EXPENSES.
------------------------------
The estimated fees, commissions and expenses incurred or to be incurred in
making the investments authorized in connection with this Application are
$15,000. The estimated fees, commissions and expenses will vary depending upon,
among other things, the size and complexity of any particular transaction. In
general, these costs would be incurred primarily in connection with performing
due diligence and investigation and negotiating the transactional documents to
which Applicants would become a party.
ITEM 3. APPLICABLE STATUTORY PROVISIONS.
-------------------------------
A. By this Application, Applicants are seeking authorization pursuant to
Section 9(c)(3) of the Act to invest, directly or through one or more
subsidiaries, in additional Tax Credit Projects through the acquisition of
interests in limited partnerships and manager-managed LLCs from time to time
through December 31, 2005. These investments will be substantially identical to
those in which Applicants already hold an interest. Applicants are not seeking
authorization to change their current roles as passive investor in such
projects. Applicants' activities would be limited to managing its investments in
Tax Credit Projects, review and analysis of the financial statements generated
8
by third-party property management firms, and the conduct of due diligence in
order to ensure that Tax Credit Projects remain eligible for the tax credits.
As stated above, under the Merger Order, the Commission authorized
FirstEnergy and its subsidiaries to retain the existing investments in LIHTC
properties. Other newly registered holding companies have also been authorized
to retain preexisting passive investments in LIHTC properties, as well as
historic structures and other rehabilitated buildings that qualify for tax
credit projects. See e.g., WPL Holdings, Inc., Holding Co. Act Release No. 26856
-------- ------------------
(Apr. 14, 1998); Exelon Corporation, Holding Co. Act Release No. 27256 (Oct. 19,
------------------
2000); and CP&L Energy, Inc., Holding Co. Act Release No. 27284 (Nov. 27, 2000).
-----------------
In Exelon Corp., the Commission stated that such interests are retainable if
------------
they are "passive," are made for the purpose of obtaining the tax credits, and
are "self-liquidating," i.e., the assets wind down as the tax credits expire.
----
The Commission has also authorized, on a programmatic basis similar to that
proposed in this Application, new investments of this type by registered holding
companies, subject, generally, to the limitation that no affiliation is created
between a holding company and any venture owning or operating a Tax Credit
Project. See, e.g., Georgia Power Company, Holding Co. Act Release No. 26220
---- -----------------------
(Jan. 24, 1995); and Alliant Energy Corporation, et al., Holding Co. Act Release
----------------------------------
No. 27060 (Aug. 13, 1999) and Holding Co. Act Release No. 27418 (June 11, 2001)
(eliminating service territory restriction contained in prior order).
B. Rule 54 Analysis. The proposed transactions are also subject to the
-----------------
requirements of Rule 54. Rule 54 provides that in determining whether to approve
an application by a registered holding company which does not relate to any
exempt wholesale generator ("EWG") or "foreign utility company" ("FUCO"), the
Commission shall not consider the effect of the capitalization or earnings of
any subsidiary which is an EWG or a FUCO upon the registered holding company if
paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of Rule 53 are satisfied.
FirstEnergy currently meets all of the conditions of Rule 53(a), except for
clause (1). In the Merger Order, the Commission, among other things, authorized
FirstEnergy to invest in EWGs and FUCOs so that FirstEnergy's "aggregate
investment," as defined in Rule 53(a)(1), in EWGs and FUCOs does not exceed $5
billion, which amount is above the level which would be permitted by clause (1)
of Rule 53(a) if such amount were to be currently calculated. The Merger Order
also specifies that this $5 billion amount may include amounts invested in EWGs
and FUCOs by FirstEnergy and GPU at the time of the Merger Order ("Current
Investments") and amounts relating to possible transfers to EWGs of certain
generating facilities owned by certain of FirstEnergy's operating utilities
("GenCo Investments"). FirstEnergy has made the commitment that through June 30,
2003, its aggregate investment in EWGs and FUCOs other than the Current
Investments and GenCo Investments ("Other Investments") will not exceed $1.5
billion. The Commission has reserved jurisdiction over investments that exceed
such amount.
As of September 30, 2002, and on the same basis as set forth in the Merger
Order, FirstEnergy's aggregate investment in EWGs and FUCOs was approximately
$1,271,855,000, or 68.66% of FirstEnergy's retained earnings as of September 30,
2003, an amount significantly below the $5 billion amount authorized in the
Merger Order.
9
In any event, even taking into account the capitalization of and earnings
from EWGs and FUCOs in which FirstEnergy currently has an interest, there would
be no basis for the Commission to withhold approval of the transactions proposed
herein. With respect to capitalization, since the date of the Merger Order,
there has been no material adverse impact on FirstEnergy's consolidated
capitalization resulting from FirstEnergy's investments in EWGs and FUCOs.
Additionally, the proposed transactions will not have any material impact on
FirstEnergy's capitalization. Further, since the date of the Merger Order, and,
after taking into account the effects of the Merger, there has been no material
change in FirstEnergy's level of earnings from EWGs and FUCOs.
FirstEnergy satisfies all of the other conditions of paragraphs (a) and (b)
of Rule 53. With respect to Rule 53(a)(2), FirstEnergy maintains books and
records in conformity with, and otherwise adheres to, the requirements thereof.
With respect to Rule 53(a)(3), no more than 2% of the employees of FirstEnergy's
domestic public utility companies render services, at any one time, directly or
indirectly, to EWGs or FUCOs in which FirstEnergy directly or indirectly holds
an interest. With respect to Rule 53(a)(4), FirstEnergy will continue to provide
a copy of each application and certificate relating to EWGs and FUCOs and
relevant portions of its Form U5S to each regulator referred to therein, and
will otherwise comply with the requirements thereof concerning the furnishing of
information. With respect to Rule 53(b), none of the circumstances enumerated in
subparagraphs (1), (2) and (3) thereunder have occurred. Finally, Rule 53(c) by
its terms is inapplicable since the proposed transaction does not involve the
issue or sale of a security to finance the acquisition of an EWG or FUCO.
ITEM 4. REGULATORY APPROVAL.
-------------------
No state commission and no federal commission, other than this Commission,
will have jurisdiction over the transactions proposed herein.
ITEM 5. PROCEDURE.
---------
Applicants request that the Commission issue an order with respect to this
Application at the earliest practicable date, but in no event no later than
December 20, 2002. It is further requested that: (i) there not be a recommended
decision by an Administrative Law Judge or other responsible officer of the
Commission, (ii) the Office of Public Utility Regulation be permitted to assist
in the preparation of the Commission's decision and (iii) there be no waiting
period between the issuance of the Commission's order and the date on which it
is to become effective.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
---------------------------------
(a) Exhibits.
--------
A - None.
B - None.
C - None.
10
D - None.
E - None.
F-1 - Opinion of Thelen Reid & Priest LLP. (Filed herewith).
F-2 - Opinion of Gary D. Benz, Esq. (Filed herewith).
H - List of FirstEnergy's current LIHTC Investments.
(Previously filed).
I - Tax Credit Pro Forma. (Previously filed).
(b) Financial Statements.
--------------------
A-1 - FirstEnergy Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31,
2001, and Consolidated Statements of Income, and Statement
of Retained Earnings, for the twelve months ended December
31, 2001. Incorporated by reference to FirstEnergy Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2001) (File No. 333-21011)
A-2 - Ohio Edison Company Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
December 31, 2001, and Consolidated Statements of Income and
Consolidated Condensed Statement of Cash Flows for the year
ended December 31, 2001. (Incorporated by reference to Ohio
Edison Company Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2001) (File No. 1-2578)
A-3 - The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Consolidated
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2001, and Consolidated
Statements of Income and Consolidated Condensed Statement of
Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2001.
(Incorporated by reference to The Cleveland Electric
Illuminating Company Form 10-K for the period ended December
31, 2001) (File No. 1-2323)
A-4 - The Toledo Edison Company Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
December 31, 2001, and Consolidated Statements of Income and
Consolidated Condensed Statement of Cash Flows for the year
ended December 31, 2001. (Incorporated by reference to The
Toledo Edison Company Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2001) (File No. 1-3583)
11
A-5 - Pennsylvania Power Company Consolidated Balance Sheet as
of December 31, 2001, and Consolidated Statements of Income
and Consolidated Condensed Statement of Cash Flows for the
year ended December 31, 2001. (Incorporated by reference to
Pennsylvania Power Company Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2001) (File No. 1-3491)
A-6 - Metropolitan Edison Company Consolidated Balance Sheet as
of December 31, 2001, and Consolidated Statements of Income
and Consolidated Condensed Statement of Cash Flows for the
year ended December 31, 2001. (Incorporated by reference to
Metropolitan Edison Company Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2001) (File No. 1-446)
A-7 - Pennsylvania Electric Company Consolidated Balance Sheet
as of December 31, 2001, and Consolidated Statements of
Income and Consolidated Condensed Statement of Cash Flows
for the year ended December 31, 2001. (Incorporated by
reference to Pennsylvania Electric Company Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2001) (File No. 1-3522)
A-8 - Jersey Central Power & Light Company Consolidated Balance
Sheet as of December 31, 2001, and Consolidated Statements
of Income and Consolidated Condensed Statement of Cash Flows
for the year ended December 31, 2001. (Incorporated
by reference to Jersey Central Power & Light Company Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2001) (File No.
(File No. 1-3141)
ITEM 7. INFORMATION AS TO ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS.
---------------------------------------
(a) As such, the issuance of an order by your Commission with respect to this
Application is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of
the human environment.
(b) No Federal agency has prepared or is preparing an environmental impact
statement with respect to this Application.
12
SIGNATURES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PUBLIC UTILITY HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF
1935, THE UNDERSIGNED COMPANIES HAVE DULY CAUSED THIS STATEMENT TO BE SIGNED ON
THEIR BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.
FIRSTENERGY CORP.
By:
/s/ Harvey L. Wagner
-------------------------
Harvey L. Wagner
Vice President and
Controller
OHIO EDISON COMPANY The Cleveland
Electric Illuminating Company The
Toledo Edison Company Pennsylvania
Power Company American Transmission
Systems, Incorporated Metropolitan
Edison Company Pennsylvania Electric
Company Jersey Central Power & Light
Company
By:
/s/ Harvey L. Wagner
-------------------------
Harvey L. Wagner
Vice President and
Controller
Date: December 19, 2002
13