eps3145.htm
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
SCHEDULE 14A
INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to
Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
Filed by the
Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the
Registrant o
Check the appropriate
box:
o Preliminary Proxy
Statement.
o Confidential, for Use
of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2)).
x Definitive Proxy Statement.
o Definitive Additional Materials.
o Soliciting Material Pursuant to
§240.14a-12.
GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its
Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other than the
Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the
appropriate box):
o No
fee required.
x Fee computed on table below
per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities
to which transaction applies: Common stock, par value
$0.01
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to
which transaction applies: 30,880,435
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying
value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set
forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined): The filing fee was determined based on the $28,000,000
total consideration proposed to be paid to GreenMan Technologies, Inc. in
the transaction.
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value
of transaction: $28,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
Total fee paid: $1,101.00
|
|
|
o
|
Fee paid previously with
preliminary materials.
|
|
|
o
|
Check box if any part of the fee
is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify
the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule
and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amount Previously
Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration
Statement No.:
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Filing
Party:
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Date Filed:
|
Persons who are to respond to the
collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond
unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
12498 Wyoming Avenue
South
Savage, Minnesota 55378
(781) 224-2411
October 23, 2008
Dear Shareholders:
I
am pleased to enclose the proxy statement for our Special Meeting of
shareholders to be held on November 13, 2008. We are asking
shareholders to approve the sale of our tire recycling business to Liberty Tire
Services, LLC and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Liberty Tire Services of Ohio,
LLC for an estimated $26 million (the “Transaction”). The final price will be
determined based on a five times multiple of EBITDA (earnings before interest,
tax, depreciation, and amortization) of our tire recycling business for the
twelve months ended September 30, 2008 minus certain of our liabilities assumed
by the purchaser and not paid at the closing of the Transaction, plus the
assumption by the purchaser of certain of our liabilities and is subject to
certain purchase price adjustments.
This
sale will allow us to repay approximately $19 million of outstanding obligations
including approximately $13 million due our primary secured lender and
approximately $6 million of transaction related debt and payables and other
obligations. We estimate our net cash will exceed $5 million after closing of
the Transaction and intend to use such cash to grow our Welch Products' business
model nationwide and pursue additional recycling, alternative fuel, alternative
energy and other “Green” business opportunities.
The
date, time, place, and agenda for the Special Meeting are set forth in the
accompanying notice of Special Meeting. The accompanying proxy
statement contains important information about the proposals to be submitted for
a vote at the Special Meeting, including approval of the sale of our tire
recycling business to Liberty Tire Services, LLC and Liberty Tire Services of
Ohio, LLC.
Please
review this information carefully in deciding how to vote. Our Board of Directors unanimously
recommends that you vote “FOR” each proposal.
YOUR VOTE ON THESE MATTERS IS
IMPORTANT. Please see the accompanying notice of meeting for instructions
on how to vote.
I look forward to seeing you at the
meeting.
Sincerely,
Lyle Jensen
President and Chief Executive
Officer
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
12498 Wyoming Avenue
South
Savage, Minnesota 55378
(781) 224-2411
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 13, 2008
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Special
Meeting of shareholders (the “Special Meeting”) of GreenMan Technologies, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (“GreenMan,” “we” or “us”), will be held on November 13,
2008, at 10:00 a.m., local time, in the Youngstown Room at the Sleep Inn
& Suites, 5850 Morning Star Court, Pleasant Hill, Iowa 50327. At
our Special Meeting we will ask you to:
|
1.
|
Approve the sale of substantially
all of our assets that relate to our scrap tire recycling business (the
“Tire Recycling Business”) pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement dated
September 12, 2008 by and among Liberty Tire Services, LLC, Liberty
Tire Services of Ohio, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Liberty Tire
Services, LLC, GreenMan and two of our wholly owned subsidiaries, GreenMan
Technologies of Iowa, Inc., and GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota,
Inc.;
|
|
2.
|
Approve one or more adjournments
of the Special Meeting, if deemed necessary to facilitate the approval of
Proposal No. 1, including to permit the solicitation of
additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the
Special Meeting to establish a quorum or to approve
Proposal No. 1; and
|
|
3.
|
Transact any other business that
may properly come before the Special Meeting and any adjournment or
postponement thereof.
|
Our Board of Directors unanimously
recommends that you vote “FOR” Proposals 1 and 2 and that you allow our
representatives to vote the shares represented by your proxy as recommended by
our Board of Directors.
Pursuant to our bylaws, our Board of
Directors has fixed the close of business on October 3, 2008, as the record date
(the “Record Date”) for determining those shareholders entitled to notice of and
to vote at the Special Meeting. The affirmative vote of holders of a
majority of our outstanding shares of common stock is required in order to
approve the sale of the Tire Recycling Business. The affirmative vote of holders of a majority of our shares of common stock issued and
outstanding as of the Record Date that are represented in person or by proxy and
entitled to vote at the Special Meeting is required in order to approve
the proposal to authorize
the adjournment of the Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary.
Each of these proposals is more fully described in the accompanying proxy
statement.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS,
Lyle Jensen
President and Chief Executive
Officer
October 23, 2008
Savage, Minnesota
A FORM OF PROXY IS
ENCLOSED. YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. IT IS IMPORTANT THAT PROXIES
BE RETURNED PROMPTLY. THEREFORE, WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO BE PRESENT IN PERSON
AT THE SPECIAL MEETING, PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED
PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE, WHICH DOES NOT REQUIRE POSTAGE IF MAILED IN THE
UNITED STATES. YOUR PROXY MAY BE REVOKED AT ANY TIME BEFORE THE VOTE AT THE
SPECIAL MEETING BY FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURES OUTLINED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY
STATEMENT. THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY YOUR PROXY WILL BE VOTED
ACCORDING TO YOUR SPECIFIED RESPONSE. PROPERLY EXECUTED PROXIES THAT DO NOT
CONTAIN VOTING INSTRUCTIONS WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF
THE PROPOSALS AND THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY. IF YOU FAIL TO RETURN A
PROPERLY EXECUTED PROXY CARD OR TO VOTE IN PERSON AT THE SPECIAL MEETING, THE
EFFECT WILL BE A VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSALS AND THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED
THEREBY.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
Page
|
Summary Term
Sheet
|
2
|
Questions and Answers About the
Special Meeting and Related Proposals
|
10
|
The Special
Meeting
|
12
|
Forward Looking
Statements
|
14
|
Risk
Factors
|
15
|
Proposal No.
1: Approval of the Sale of the Tire Recycling
Business
|
18
|
The Parties
|
18
|
Reasons for the Sale of the Tire Recycling
Business
|
19
|
Background of the Sale of the Tire Recycling
Business
|
20
|
Effect of the Sale of the Tire Recycling
Business
|
21
|
Opinion of Financial Advisor to
the Board of Directors
|
23
|
The Asset Purchase
Agreement
|
26
|
The Voting
Agreement
|
32
|
Related Party
Transactions
|
33
|
Certain Material Federal
and State Income Tax Consequences of the Proposed Sale
|
34
|
Accounting
Treatment
|
34
|
Regulatory
Approvals
|
34
|
No Changes in the Rights of
Shareholders
|
34
|
No Appraisal
Rights
|
34
|
Required
Vote
|
34
|
Recommendation of our Board
of Directors Regarding the Sale of the Tire Recycling
Business
|
35
|
Proposal No.
2: Adjournment
|
36
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated
Financial Information
|
37
|
Pro Forma Consolidated Balance
Sheet as of June 30, 2008 (Unaudited)
|
38
|
Pro Forma Consolidated
Statement of Operations Nine Months Ended June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
|
39
|
Pro Forma Consolidated
Statement of Operations Nine Months Ended June 30, 2007
(Unaudited)
|
40
|
Pro Forma Consolidated
Statement of Operations Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2007
(Unaudited)
|
|
Unaudited Financial Statements –
Tire Recycling Business
|
43
|
Balance Sheets as of June
30, 2008 (Unaudited),September 30, 2007 and 2006
|
44
|
Statements of Operations
for the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007 (Unaudited) and
the Fiscal Years ended September 30, 2007 and 2006
|
45
|
Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management
|
49
|
Other
Matters
|
50
|
Stockholder
Proposals
|
50
|
Where you Can Find More
Information
|
50
|
Request to Sign, Date and Return
Proxies
|
50
|
This proxy statement and the form of
proxy were first mailed to stockholders on or about October 23,
2008.
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
12498 Wyoming Avenue
South
Savage,
Minnesota 55378
(781)
224-2411
PROXY
STATEMENT
Special
Meeting of Stockholders
To
Be Held November 13, 2008
10:00
A.M.
The enclosed Proxy is solicited by the
Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors”) of GreenMan Technologies, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”) for use at our special meeting of
stockholders (“Special Meeting”) to be held in the Youngstown Room at the Sleep
Inn & Suites, 5850 Morning Star Court, Pleasant Hill, Iowa 50327. It is
anticipated that this Proxy Statement will be mailed to our stockholders on or
about October 23, 2008. References to the “Company,” “us,” “we,” or “our,” refer
to GreenMan Technologies, Inc.
The Special Meeting is for the purpose
of considering and voting upon:
|
(1)
|
A
proposal to approve the sale
of substantially all of our assets that relate to our scrap tire recycling
business (the “Tire Recycling Business”) pursuant to the Asset Purchase
Agreement dated September 12, 2008 by and among Liberty Tire
Services, LLC, Liberty Tire Services of Ohio, LLC, a wholly owned
subsidiary of Liberty Tire Services, LLC, GreenMan and two of our wholly
owned subsidiaries, GreenMan Technologies of Iowa, Inc., and GreenMan
Technologies of Minnesota, Inc.;
|
|
(2)
|
A
proposal to approve one or
more adjournments of the Special Meeting, if deemed necessary to
facilitate the approval of Proposal No. 1, including to permit
the solicitation of additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes
at the time of the Special Meeting to establish a quorum or to approve
Proposal No. 1;
and
|
|
(3)
|
Such
other business as may properly come before the Special Meeting or any
adjournment or postponement thereof will also be
considered.
|
The
Board of Directors is not aware of any other business to come before the Special
Meeting, and unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” these
proposals.
The following summary, together with the
question and answer section, provides an overview of the proposed sale of our
Tire Recycling Business (as defined below) discussed in this Proxy Statement and
the attached appendices. This summary also contains cross-references to the more
detailed discussions elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary may not
contain all of the information that is important to you. To understand fully the
proposed sale of our Tire Recycling Business and for a more complete description
of the terms thereto, you should carefully read this entire Proxy Statement,
including the information incorporated by reference, and the attached appendices
in their entirety.
Proposal No. 1: Sale of our Tire Recycling
Business:
General (see
page 18)
We have entered into the Asset Purchase
Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Liberty Tire Services,
LLC (“LTS”) and Liberty Tire Services of Ohio, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of
LTS (the “Purchaser” and together with LTS, the “LTS Group”) pursuant to which we will sell to the
Purchaser the assets held by our two tire recycling subsidiaries,
GreenMan Technologies of Iowa, Inc. and GreenMan Technologies of
Minnesota, Inc. (collectively, the
“Tire Recycling Subsidiaries”) that constitute our business of collecting,
processing and marketing scrap tires in whole, shredded or granular form (the
“Tire Recycling Business”). For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, our
Tire Recycling Business had revenue of $20.2 million or 100% of our total
revenue and operating income of $3.2 million as compared to total net
income of approximately $294,000 on a consolidated basis. At June 30,
2008, our Tire Recycling Business had total assets of $15.4 million or 86%
of our total assets.
The Parties (see page
18)
GreenMan Technologies,
Inc.
We operate two facilities that collect,
process and market scrap tires in whole, shredded or granular form. We are
headquartered in Savage, Minnesota and currently operate tire processing
facilities in Iowa and Minnesota. We were originally founded
in 1992 and have operated as a Delaware corporation since 1995. Our
core business the Tire Recycling Business. On October 1, 2007 we
acquired Welch Products, Inc., a company headquartered in Carlisle, Iowa that specializes in design, product
development, and manufacturing of environmentally responsible products using
recycled materials, primarily recycled rubber. Through a subsidiary,
Playtribe, Inc., Welch Products also provides innovative playground design,
equipment and installation.
GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota,
Inc.
GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota, Inc.
is a Minnesota corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of
GreenMan. GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota, Inc. operates our tire
processing facility located in Savage, Minnesota.
GreenMan Technologies of Iowa,
Inc.
GreenMan Technologies of Iowa, Inc. is
an Iowa corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of GreenMan. GreenMan
Technologies of Iowa, Inc. operates our tire processing facility located in Des
Moines, Iowa.
Liberty Tire Services,
LLC
Liberty Tire Services, LLC, is a
Delaware limited liability company based in Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania. LTS is the largest tire recycling company in the
United States and currently operates fourteen scrap
tire processing facilities. LTS’ principal executive offices are
located at 625 Liberty
Avenue, Suite 3100,
Pittsburgh, PA 15222, and its phone number is (412)
562-0148.
Liberty
Tire Services of Ohio,
LLC
Liberty Tire Services of Ohio, LLC is a
Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of
LTS. The Purchaser will be purchasing our Tire Recycling
Business.
Reasons for the Sale of the Tire
Recycling Business (see page 19)
We believe that the sale of the Tire
Recycling Business and the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement are in the best
interests of our shareholders. The sale of the Tire Recycling Business will
permit us to focus on our other business unit and provide the following
anticipated benefits:
|
·
|
Provide us with immediately
available funds to pay off a majority of our outstanding indebtedness;
and
|
|
·
|
Allow us to focus on our other
business units, and identify and develop new business
opportunities.
|
Our Board of Directors also considered
various risks when evaluating the sale of the Tire Recycling Business, which
include:
|
·
|
The viability of our remaining
business after the sale of the Tire Recycling Business and our ability to
identify and develop new business
opportunities;
|
|
·
|
The possibility that the proposed
sale might not be completed and the effect on our business and financial
position;
|
|
·
|
The terms of the Asset Purchase
Agreement provide that we will be prohibited from competing with the Tire
Recycling Business anywhere within the states of Iowa, Minnesota,
Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota,
South Dakota and Wisconsin
for a period of five years from the date of the sale of the Tire Recycling
Business; and
|
|
·
|
The effect of the public
announcement of the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling Business on key
customer accounts and on our ability to attract and retain
personnel.
|
Background of the Sale of the Tire
Recycling Business (see page 20)
In
response to the belief we would be unable to meet increased monthly principal
payments due our primary secured lender, Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. (“Laurus”),
which are scheduled to commence on October 1, 2008 and the fact that any
material modification to the existing terms and maturity of the debt would be
extremely costly, our Board of Directors began to actively explore strategic
alternatives during the first quarter of fiscal 2007. Management and members of
the Board of Directors met with over 20 entities to discuss various potential
strategic alternatives.
In early 2008, senior management met on
several occasions with representatives of LTS to discuss the potential
acquisition of GreenMan’s Tire Recycling Business by LTS or an affiliate of LTS.
Based on LTS’ managements’ extensive knowledge of the tire recycling industry
and LTS’ recent history of significant acquisitions within the Midwest, our
Board of Directors believed LTS would be a suitable buyer for our Tire Recycling
Business. In April 2008, we received a non-binding proposal from LTS to purchase
the Tire Recycling Businesses. In June 2008 senior management of LTS gave a
presentation to our Board of Directors regarding a potential
transaction.
On July 1, 2008, our Board of Directors
met to discuss the status of the potential transaction with LTS and approved the
execution of a non-binding letter of intent for the purchase of the Tire
Recycling Business by LTS and/or its affiliate.
During August 2008 we received a draft
agreement that covered the basic terms of the proposed
transaction. Throughout the following weeks, we and our
advisors negotiated the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement with LTS and its
advisors. On September 9, 2008, we finalized the terms of the Asset Purchase
Agreement.
On September 11, 2008, our Board of
Directors convened a meeting to review the final Asset Purchase Agreement and
the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling Business. During the meeting,
BCC Advisers, an independent financial adviser hired to provide a fairness
opinion, delivered an oral opinion. The opinion was subsequently
confirmed in writing to our Board of Directors as to the fairness to the holders
of shares of our common stock of the sale of the Tire Recycling Business, from a
financial point of view, considering the cash consideration (before any
adjustments) to be paid to us in connection with the sale of the Tire Recycling
Business. Based on this information and after additional discussions, the Board
of Directors determined that entry into the Asset Purchase Agreement and
completion of the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling Business were in the best
interests of the Company and our shareholders. Our Board of Directors then
approved (i) the Asset Purchase Agreement, (ii) the related
transaction agreements, and (iii) the proposed sale of our Tire Recycling
Business to LTS on the terms set forth in those agreements, and authorized
management to execute the Asset Purchase Agreement and the other transaction
agreements on our behalf.
On September 12, 2008, we executed the
Asset Purchase Agreement with LTS and the Purchaser and publicly announced the
agreement on September 15, 2008.
If our shareholders approve the sale of
the Tire Recycling Business, we will seek to complete the sale. We will use the
proceeds of the sale of the Tire Recycling Business to repay
approximately $19 million of outstanding obligations, including
approximately $13 million due Laurus and approximately $6 million of transaction
related debt and payables and other obligations (consisting of $4 million in
capital lease obligations and notes payable of the Tire Recycling Subsidiaries,
$1.5 million of taxes due as a result of the sale of the Tire Recycling Business
and $.5 in notes payable by GreenMan). Approximately $1.3 million of the
purchase price (as described below) will be subject to indemnification claims
which may be brought by LTS or the Purchaser, as more fully described in the
description of the Asset Purchase Agreement below. The purchase price will also
be subject to adjustment based upon net working capital levels at closing.
We estimate our net cash after the closing of the proposed sale of the
Tire Recycling Business (the “Closing”) will exceed $5 million. We
intend to use such cash to grow our Welch Products' business model nationwide
and pursue additional recycling, alternative fuel, alternative energy and other
“Green” business opportunities that are intended to increase shareholder
value.
Opinion of Financial Advisor to the
Board of Directors (see page 23)
Our financial advisor, BCC Advisers,
delivered a written opinion to our Board of Directors as to the fairness to the
holders of our common stock of the sale of the Tire Recycling Business, from a
financial point of view, considering the cash consideration (before any
adjustments) to be paid to us in connection with the sale of the Tire Recycling
Business. The full text of the written opinion of BCC Advisers, dated September
10, 2008, is attached as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement and should be
read in its entirety for a description of the procedures followed, assumptions
made, matters concerned and limitations on the review undertaken. We paid BCC
Advisers a fee for the delivery of this opinion.
THE OPINION OF BCC ADVISERS IS DIRECTED
TO OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS. THE OPINION WILL NOT BE UPDATED AND DOES
NOT CONSTITUTE A RECOMMENDATION TO ANY SHAREHOLDER AS TO HOW SUCH SHAREHOLDER
SHOULD VOTE ON THE PROPOSED SALE OF THE TIRE RECYCLING
BUSINESS.
The Asset Purchase Agreement (see
page 26)
Purchase Price
As consideration for the sale of all the
assets relating to the Tire Recycling Subsidiaries, Purchaser will pay us
approximately $26 million, based on a five times multiple of EBITDA
(earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization) subject to a
post-closing adjustment based on the final net working capital of the Tire
Recycling Subsidiaries as of the Closing. At the Closing, approximately $19
million of the purchase price will be used to pay down outstanding
obligations, including approximately $13 million due our primary secured lender,
Laurus and approximately $6 million of transaction related debt and payables and
other obligations (consisting of $4 million in capital lease obligations and
notes payable of the Tire Recycling Subsidiaries, $1.5 million of taxes due as a
result of the sale of the Tire Recycling Business and $.5 in notes payable by
GreenMan). In addition, the Purchaser will withhold $0.5 million
and we will place approximately $1.3 million in a restricted cash account to
cover possible indemnification claims by Purchaser and LTS. The
Purchaser will also withhold $0.25 million until EBITDA of the Tire Recycling
Subsidiaries is finally determined.
The Asset Purchase Agreement is attached
to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A. We encourage you to read the Asset
Purchase Agreement carefully. Our Board of Directors has unanimously approved
the Asset Purchase Agreement, which is the binding legal agreement that governs
the terms of the sale of our Tire Recycling Business.
Some of the key provisions of the Asset
Purchase Agreement are as follows:
Representations and
Warranties
The Asset Purchase Agreement contains
customary representations and warranties of the parties relating to, among other
things, their authority to enter into the Asset Purchase Agreement and, in the
case of GreenMan, various aspects of the Tire Recycling Business. For
a more detailed description of the representations and warranties of each of the
parties, please see page 28.
Covenants
The Asset Purchase Agreement contains
customary covenants of the parties, including agreements by us to conduct the
Tire Recycling Business in accordance with ordinary past practices and to
refrain from certain actions between the time of signing the Asset Purchase
Agreement and the closing of the sale of the Tire Recycling Business, and to use
commercially reasonable efforts to solicit shareholder proxies approving the
sale of the Tire Recycling Business.
No Solicitation of Competitive
Proposals; Superior Offer
Under the terms of the Asset Purchase
Agreement, we have agreed to immediately cease any discussions with any third
party other than LTS and the Purchaser with respect to any sale of our Tire
Recycling Business. In addition, we have agreed not to directly or indirectly
solicit, initiate or encourage any inquiries or proposals regarding any
acquisition proposal or participate in any discussions or negotiations
regarding, or furnish to any person any information with respect of, or take any
other action to facilitate, any acquisition proposal. An acquisition
proposal is any inquiry, offer or proposal by any person, other than the LTS
Group, to acquire all or any material portion of our assets or the assets of the
Tire Recycling Subsidiaries or any of our capital stock or the capital stock of
the Tire Recycling Subsidiaries.
The Asset Purchase Agreement provides
that our Board of Directors may, at any time prior to obtaining shareholder
approval of the sale of the Tire Recycling Business, withdraw or modify its
approval or recommendation of the Asset Purchase Agreement or the sale of the
Tire Recycling Business or approve or recommend a superior offer to purchase the
Tire Recycling Business if our Board of Directors determines, in good faith,
that such offer constitutes a superior offer and determines that to do otherwise
would violate the fiduciary duties of our Board of Directors. We will
be required to pay a termination fee equal to 4% of the purchase price if we
terminate the Asset Purchase Agreement due to a superior
offer.
Indemnification
The Asset Purchase Agreement provides
that each party will indemnify the other for any losses incurred as a result of,
among other things, breaches of representations, warranties and covenants,
subject in certain circumstances to specified dollar and time
limitations.
Conditions to
Closing
The obligations of the parties to
complete the sale of the Tire Recycling Business are subject to certain
customary closing conditions, including, among other things:
|
·
|
the accuracy in all material
respects of all of our representations and warranties in the Asset
Purchase Agreement;
|
|
·
|
our performance in all material
respects of all of our covenants and obligations under the Asset Purchase
Agreement to be performed or complied with by us prior to the completion
of the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling
Business;
|
|
·
|
the Purchaser shall have obtained
on terms and conditions satisfactory to it funds sufficient to complete
the transaction; and
|
|
·
|
the shareholders of the Company
shall have approved the proposed
sale.
|
Termination
The Asset Purchase Agreement may be
terminated:
|
·
|
by mutual consent of the
parties;
|
|
·
|
by either party if the other party
has failed to satisfy any of the closing conditions required to be
satisfied by such party prior to
Closing;
|
|
·
|
by either party if the other party
has committed a material breach of any provision of the Asset Purchase
Agreement and such breach has not been cured by such party within five
business days of receipt of notice of such
breach;
|
|
·
|
by us, if our Board of Directors,
in compliance with the requirements of the Asset Purchase Agreement,
concludes in good faith after consultation with legal counsel that a
proposed transaction with a third party is superior to the terms of the
proposed sale of the Tire Recycling Business and the failure to terminate
the Asset Purchase Agreement in order to enter into a definitive agreement
to complete such a superior proposal would be in violation of the
fiduciary duties of our Board of
Directors;
|
|
·
|
by Purchaser, if our Board of
Directors withdraws or modifies its approval of the proposed sale of the
Tire Recycling Business, approves, adopts or recommends another
acquisition proposal, or approves or recommends that the Company enter
into any agreement with respect to another acquisition proposal, or
proposes to do any of the foregoing, or if we breach any of the material
exclusivity provisions of the Asset Purchase Agreement, subject to the
right of our Board of Directors to terminate the Asset Purchase Agreement
to accept a superior proposal, as described
above;
|
|
·
|
by either party, if our
shareholders have not approved the sale of the Tire Recycling Business;
or
|
|
·
|
by either party, if the Purchaser
fails to obtain on terms and conditions satisfactory to it funds
sufficient to complete the
transaction.
|
Termination Payment and
Expenses
All parties to the Asset Purchase
Agreement have agreed that each party will pay its own
expenses.
Under the terms of the Asset Purchase
Agreement, we have agreed to pay LTS a termination fee equal to 4% of the
purchase price (approximately $1.04 million) if:
|
·
|
we terminate the Asset Purchase
Agreement due to a determination by our Board of Directors, in compliance
with the requirements of the Asset Purchase Agreement, in good faith after
consultation with legal counsel that a proposed transaction with a third
party is superior to the terms of the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling
Business and the failure to terminate the Asset Purchase Agreement in
order to enter into a definitive agreement to complete such a superior
proposal would be in violation of the fiduciary duties of our Board of
Directors; or
|
|
·
|
Purchaser terminates the Asset
Purchase Agreement due to a breach by us of our obligations not to
withdraw or modify, or propose to withdraw or modify our approval of the
transaction or our violation of the material exclusivity provisions of the
Asset Purchase Agreement.
|
The Voting Agreement (see page
32)
Simultaneously
with the execution and delivery of the Asset Purchase Agreement, the members of
our Board of Directors and all of our executive officers entered into the Voting
Agreement with LTS, Purchaser and us (the “Voting Agreement”). Pursuant to the
Voting Agreement, our directors and executive officers have agreed to vote in
favor of the Asset Purchase Agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby. As of September 12, 2008, the shares covered by the Voting
Agreement represented in the aggregate approximately 25% of our outstanding
common stock.
Related Party Transactions (see page
33)
Tire
Recycling Business Related Party Transactions
We
rent several pieces of equipment on a monthly basis from Valley View Farms, Inc.
and Maust Asset Management, LLC, two companies co-owned by Mark Maust, who is
President of GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota, Inc. and GreenMan Technologies
of Iowa, Inc. In addition, we have entered into several capital lease
agreements with Maust Asset Management, LLC which had an outstanding balance of
approximately $640,000 at September 30, 2008. At the Closing of the sale of the
Tire Recycling Business, the Purchaser will assume all remaining obligations
under these capital lease agreements, and such amounts will be deducted from the
proceeds of the sale received by us.
In
April 2003, GreenMan Technologies of Iowa, Inc. entered into a ten-year lease
with Maust Asset Management, LLC for a facility located on approximately 4 acres
of land in Des Moines, Iowa. In April 2005, GreenMan Technologies of
Iowa, Inc. entered into an eight-year lease with Maust Asset Management, LLC for
approximately 3 acres adjacent to the existing Iowa facility. The
aggregate current monthly rent payment under both leases is $11,750 plus real
estate taxes. These lease arrangements will terminate at the close of the sale
of the Tire Recycling Business, and we expect that the Purchaser will enter into
a new lease arrangement with Maust Asset Management, LLC.
GreenMan
Technologies of Minnesota, Inc. leases property located in Savage, Minnesota
from Two Oaks, LLC, an entity co-owned by Mark Maust under a 12-year lease
agreement. This lease will terminate at the close of the sale of the Tire
Recycling Business, and we expect that the Purchaser will enter into a new lease
arrangement with Two Oaks, LLC.
Other
Related Party Transactions
Between June and August 2003, two
immediate family members of Maurice Needham, our Chairman of the Board of
Directors, loaned us a total of $400,000 under the terms of two-year, unsecured
promissory notes which bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum. The two
individuals agreed to extend the maturity date of these notes until the earlier
of when all amounts due under the Laurus credit facility have been repaid or
June 30, 2009. The current balance due under these notes is
$400,000.
In September 2003, Bob Davis, a former
officer of GreenMan, loaned us $400,000 under the terms of an unsecured
promissory note which bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum. In July 2006,
Mr. Davis assigned the remaining balance due under the note, $99,320, as
follows: $79,060 to one of the noteholders described in the preceding paragraph
and the remaining balance of $20,260 plus accrued interest of $13,500 to Mr.
Needham. All parties agreed to extend the maturity of the remaining
balance of this note until the earlier of when all amounts due under the Laurus
credit facility have been repaid or June 30, 2009. The current
balance due under these notes is $99,320.
Between January and June 2006, Nicholas
DeBenedictis, a director, loaned us $155,000 under three unsecured promissory
notes which bear interest at the rate of 10% per annum with interest and
principal due during the period from June 30, 2006 through September 30,
2006. During the year ended of September 30, 2007 Mr. DeBenedictis
agreed to extend the remaining balance due under the notes of $35,000 until the
earlier of when all amounts due under the restructured Laurus credit facility
have been repaid or June 30, 2009.
All outstanding principal and accrued
interest due these individuals (approximately $535,000 and $130,000,
respectively, at September 30, 2008) will be paid at the closing of the sale of
the Tire Recycling Business.
Certain Material Federal and State
Income Tax Consequences (see page 34)
The sale of assets contemplated by the
Asset Purchase Agreement will be a transaction taxable to us for United States federal and state income tax purposes.
We will recognize taxable income equal to the amount realized on the sale in
excess of our tax basis in the assets sold. However substantially all
of the taxable gain on a federal tax basis will be offset against our current
year losses from operations plus available net operating loss carry forwards, as
currently reflected on our consolidated federal income tax returns. We do not
have substantial state net operating loss carry forwards and anticipate that a
majority of our tax obligations resulting from this contemplated transaction
will be on a state tax level.
The sale of assets contemplated by the
Asset Purchase Agreement will not be a taxable event for our stockholders under
applicable United
States federal income tax
laws.
Accounting Treatment (see
page 34)
We will record the sale of the Tire
Recycling Business in accordance with generally accepted principles in the
United States. Upon completion of the disposition, we
will recognize a gain for financial statement purposes equal to the net proceeds
(sum of purchase price less expenses of the sale) less the book value of the
assets and liabilities sold.
Regulatory Approvals (see
page 34)
We are not aware of any federal or state
regulatory requirements that must be complied with or approvals that must be
obtained to complete the sale of the Tire Recycling Business, other than the
filing of this Proxy Statement with the Securities Exchange Commission (the
“SEC”). If any additional approvals or filings are required, we will use our
commercially reasonable efforts to obtain those approvals and make any required
filings before completing the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase
Agreement.
No Changes in the Rights of Shareholders
(see page 34)
There will be no change in the rights of
our shareholders as a result of the sale of the Tire Recycling
Business.
No Appraisal Rights (see
page 34)
Our shareholders do not have appraisal
rights under the Delaware General Corporation Law in connection with the sale of
the Tire Recycling Business.
Required Vote (see
page 34)
The affirmative vote of holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of common stock is required in order to
approve the sale of the Tire Recycling Business. Because the affirmative vote of
a majority of the votes entitled to be cast at the Special Meeting is required
to approve the sale of the Tire Recycling Business, abstentions, broker
“non-votes” and shares not represented at the Special Meeting will have the same
effect as a vote “AGAINST” the sale of the Tire Recycling
Business. Properly executed proxies that do not contain voting
instructions will be voted “FOR” the approval of the sale of the Tire Recycling
Business.
Recommendation of our Board of Directors
Regarding the Sale of the Tire Recycling Business
(see page 35)
For the reasons described above, our
Board of Directors has determined that the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling
Business is in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders.
Accordingly, our Board of Directors has unanimously approved the proposed sale
of the Tire Recycling Business and Asset Purchase Agreement and unanimously
recommends to our shareholders that they vote “FOR” approval of
Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Sale of the Tire Recycling
Business.
Proposal No. 2: Adjournment of
the Special Meeting:
Purpose (see
page 36)
In the event there are not sufficient
votes present, in person or by proxy, at the Special Meeting to approve the sale
of the Tire Recycling Business, our chief executive officer, acting in his
capacity as chairperson of the meeting, may propose an adjournment of the
Special Meeting to a later date or dates to permit further solicitation of
proxies.
Required Shareholder Vote to Approve the
Adjournment Proposal (see page 36)
Approval of Proposal No. 2
will require that the number of votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the
number of votes cast against it. Assuming the presence of a quorum, abstentions,
broker “non-votes” and shares not represented at the Special Meeting will have
no effect on Proposal No. 2: Adjournment.
Recommendation of our Board of Directors
(see page 36)
Our Board of Directors unanimously
recommends that our shareholders vote “FOR” approval of Proposal No. 2
to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary to obtain the requisite number of
proxies to approve Proposal No. 1.
Why am I receiving this Proxy Statement
and proxy card?
You are receiving this Proxy Statement
and proxy card because you own shares of our common stock. This Proxy Statement
describes the proposals on which we would like you, as a shareholder, to vote at
the Special Meeting. It also gives you information on the proposals so that you
can make an informed decision.
Who can vote at the Special
Meeting?
Only shareholders of record at the close
of business on October 3, 2008 will be entitled to vote at the Special
Meeting.
What is being voted
on?
You are being asked to vote on the
following matters:
1.
|
To approve the sale of our Tire
Recycling Business; and
|
2.
|
To approve one or more
adjournments of the Special Meeting, if deemed necessary to facilitate the
approval of Proposal No. 1, including to permit the solicitation
of additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the
Special Meeting to establish a quorum or to approve
Proposal No. 1.
|
What will happen if the proposed sale of
the Tire Recycling Business is approved?
If the proposed sale of the Tire
Recycling Business is approved, we will complete the sale subject to the
satisfaction of the closing conditions set forth in the Asset Purchase
Agreement. We anticipate that the transaction will close shortly after the
Special Meeting.
What will happen if the proposed sale of
the Tire Recycling Business is not approved?
If we are unable to successfully
complete the sale of our Tire Recycling Business and if we are unable to
restructure the terms and maturity of our obligations under our credit facility
with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., our senior secured lender (“Laurus”), on
acceptable terms we: (1) will be unable to meet the increased monthly principal
payments due under such credit facility with Laurus scheduled to commence in
October 2008 and therefore may be deemed to be in default under the terms of our
agreement with Laurus, which has reserved all rights with respect to such
default and who may exercise its right to foreclose on our assets; (2)
anticipate receiving a “going concern” opinion from our auditors for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2008 which will have a negative impact on our ability
to secure additional future financing; and (3) may, under certain circumstances,
owe a termination fee to Purchaser.
Does the Board of Directors recommend
that I vote on the proposals to be considered and voted upon at the Special
Meeting?
Our Board of Directors unanimously
recommends that you vote your shares:
|
·
|
“FOR” the proposed sale of the
Tire Recycling Business to the
Purchaser; and
|
|
·
|
“FOR” the adjournment of the
Special Meeting, if necessary to obtain the requisite number of proxies to
approve the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling Business to the
Purchaser.
|
How do I vote?
After carefully reading and considering
the information contained or referred to in this Proxy Statement, including the
Appendices, you may either (i) complete, sign and date your proxy card and
voting instructions and return them in the enclosed postage-paid envelope or
(ii) vote in person at the Special Meeting. Please vote your shares as soon as
possible so that your shares will be represented at the Special
Meeting.
If my shares are held in “street name”
by my broker, will my broker vote my shares for me?
Your broker will vote your shares only
if you provide instructions to your broker on how to vote. Please tell your
broker how you would like him or her to vote your shares. If you do not tell
your broker how to vote, your shares will not be voted by your
broker.
Can I change my vote after I have
delivered my proxy?
Yes. You may revoke your proxy at any
time before it is voted at the meeting by (i) delivering a written notice
of revocation to Charles E. Coppa, our Chief Financial Officer and Corporate
Secretary, at GreenMan Technologies, Inc. 12498 Wyoming Avenue South, Savage,
Minnesota, 55378 (ii) delivering a later-dated proxy, or
(iii) attending the Special Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the
Special Meeting, in and of itself, will not constitute a revocation of a proxy.
If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm or a bank, you should
contact your brokerage firm or bank for instructions on how to change your
vote.
How many votes are required to approve
the sale of the Tire Recycling Business?
The affirmative vote of holders of a
majority of the shares of common stock is required in order to approve the sale
of the Tire Recycling Business. Because the affirmative vote of a majority of
the votes entitled to be cast at the Special Meeting is required to approve the
sale of the Tire Recycling Business, abstentions, broker “non-votes” and shares
not represented at the Special Meeting will have the same effect as a vote
against the sale of the Tire Recycling Business.
Am I entitled to appraisal
rights?
No, our shareholders do not have
appraisal rights under the Delaware General Corporation Law in connection with
the sale of the Tire Recycling Business.
When do you expect the sale of the Tire
Recycling Business to be completed?
It is currently anticipated that the
transactions and actions contemplated in the Asset Purchase Agreement will be
completed as promptly as practicable following our Special Meeting to be held on
November 13, 2008.
Who is paying for this proxy
solicitation?
We will pay for the entire cost of
soliciting proxies. In addition to these mailed proxy materials, our directors
and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone or by other means
of communication. Directors and employees will not be paid any additional
compensation for soliciting proxies. We may reimburse brokerage firms, banks and
other agents for the cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial
owners. We may also engage a professional proxy solicitation
firm to assist in the proxy solicitation and, if so, will pay such solicitation
firm customary fees plus expenses.
Who
should I call if I have any questions about the Special Meeting?
If you have any questions about the
Special Meeting, you should contact Charles E. Coppa, our Chief Financial
Officer and Corporate Secretary, at (781) 224-2411.
THE SPECIAL MEETING
Time, Date and Place; Matters to be
Considered
The Special Meeting will be held on
November 13, 2008, at 10:00 a.m. local time, in the Youngstown Room at the
Sleep Inn & Suites, 5850 Morning Star Court, Pleasant Hill, Iowa 50327. At the Special Meeting, shareholders
will be asked to consider and vote upon each of the proposals and conduct such
other business as may properly come before the Special Meeting and any
adjournment thereof.
Voting and Record
Date
The Board of Directors has fixed October
3, 2008, as the record date (“Record Date”) for determining holders of shares of
our common stock that are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the
Special Meeting. Each holder of record of shares of our voting stock on the
Record Date is entitled to cast one vote per share, exercisable in person
or by a properly executed proxy, with respect to the approval of the proposals
and any other matter to be submitted to a vote of our shareholders at the
Special Meeting. At October 3, 2008, there were 30,880,435 shares of common stock
outstanding.
Approval of Proposal No. 1
will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our
outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon. Therefore, abstentions, broker
“non-votes” and shares not represented at the Special Meeting will have the same
effect as votes against Proposal No. 1. Approval of
Proposal No. 2 requires that the number of votes cast in favor of the
proposal exceed the number of votes cast against it. Assuming the presence of a
quorum, abstentions, broker “non-votes” and shares not represented at the
Special Meeting will have no effect on Proposal 2.
The Board of Directors has unanimously
approved each of the proposals and recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the
approval of each of the proposals. We are seeking requisite shareholder approval
of each of the proposals.
A complete list of shareholders entitled to vote at the
Special Meeting shall be available for
examination by any stockholder, for any purpose germane to the Special Meeting, during ordinary business hours
at the principal executive offices of the Company. The list will also be
available at the Special
Meeting.
Quorum
The required quorum for the transaction
of business at the Special Meeting is a majority of the shares entitled to vote
at such meeting by holders of shares of our common stock outstanding on the
Record Date. Broker non-votes and shares that are voted “FOR” or “AGAINST” a
proposal or marked “ABSTAIN” are treated as being present at the Special Meeting
for purposes of establishing a quorum and are also treated as shares entitled to
vote at the Special Meeting with respect to each proposal.
Abstentions and Broker
Non-Votes
Broker “non-votes” and the shares of
voting stock as to which a shareholder abstains are included for purposes of
determining whether a quorum of shares of voting stock is present at a meeting.
A broker “non-vote” occurs when a nominee holding shares of voting stock for the
beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does
not have discretionary voting power with respect to that item and has not
received instructions from the beneficial owner. Proposals 1 and 2 are
non-discretionary items, which means that a nominee may not vote on either
proposal without instructions from the beneficial owner. Since Proposal 1
requires the affirmative vote of a majority of our outstanding voting stock
entitled to vote at the Special Meeting, abstentions and broker “non-votes” have
the effect of votes “AGAINST” Proposal 1. Since Proposal 2 requires
that the number of votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the number of
votes cast against it, assuming the presence of a quorum, abstentions and broker
“non-votes” will have no effect on Proposal 2.
Brokerage Accounts
If any of your shares are held in the
name of a brokerage firm, bank, bank nominee or other institution, only it can
vote such shares and only upon receipt of your specific instructions.
Accordingly, please contact the person responsible for your account and instruct
that person to execute the proxy card representing your shares. In addition, if
you hold your shares in a brokerage or bank account, your broker or bank may
allow you to provide your voting instructions by telephone or Internet. Please
consult the materials you receive from your broker or bank prior to authorizing
a proxy by telephone or Internet.
Proxies
Our Board of Directors is asking for
your proxy. Giving the Board of Directors your proxy means you authorize the
named proxies to vote your shares at the Special Meeting in the manner you
direct. You may vote for or against the proposals or abstain from voting. All
valid proxies received prior to the Special Meeting will be voted. All shares of
common stock that are represented at the Special Meeting by properly executed
proxies received prior to or at the Special Meeting, and not duly and timely
revoked, will be voted at the Special Meeting in accordance with the choices
marked thereon by the shareholders. Unless a contrary choice is marked, the
shares represented by each proxy will be voted FOR approval of each of the
proposals. At the time this Proxy Statement was mailed to shareholders, we were
not aware that any other matters not referred to herein would be presented for
action at the Special Meeting. If any other matters properly come before the
Special Meeting, the persons designated in the proxy intend to vote the shares
represented thereby in accordance with their best judgment.
Any proxy given pursuant to this
solicitation may be revoked by the person giving it at any time before it is
voted. Proxies may be revoked by (i) filing with our Corporate Secretary at
or before the taking of the vote at the Special Meeting, a written notice of
revocation bearing a later date than the proxy, (ii) duly executing a
later-dated proxy relating to the same shares and delivering it to our Corporate
Secretary before the taking of the vote at the Special Meeting or
(iii) attending the Special Meeting and voting in person (although
attendance at the Special Meeting will not in and of itself constitute a
revocation of a proxy).
Attendance at the Special
Meeting
Only holders of common stock may attend
the Special Meeting. If you wish to attend the Special Meeting in person but you
hold your shares through someone else, such as a stockbroker, you must bring
proof of your ownership and photo identification at the Special Meeting. For
example, you could bring an account statement showing that you beneficially
owned shares of our common stock as of the record date as acceptable proof of
ownership.
Costs of
Solicitation
We will pay for the entire cost of
soliciting proxies. In addition to these mailed proxy materials, our directors
and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone or by other means
of communication. Directors and employees will not be paid any additional
compensation for soliciting proxies. We may reimburse brokerage firms, banks and
other agents for the cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial
owners. We may also engage a professional proxy solicitation
firm to assist in the proxy solicitation and, if so, will pay such solicitation
firm customary fees plus expenses.
Statements in this Proxy Statement that
are “forward-looking statements” are based on current expectations and
assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. In some cases,
forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “may,”
“should,” “potential,” “continue,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,”
“believes,” “estimates,” and similar expressions. These forward looking
statements are based on our current estimates and assumptions and, as such,
involve uncertainty and risk. Actual results could differ materially
from projected results because of factors such as:
|
·
|
If our shareholders fail to
approve the proposed sale of our Tire Recycling Business, or if we are
unable to satisfy the other conditions to closing the proposed
transaction, certain of which are not within our control, our liquidity,
financial position and business may be
harmed.
|
|
·
|
We have substantial indebtedness
to Laurus Master Fund secured by substantially all of our
assets. If an event of default occurs under the secured notes
issued to Laurus, Laurus may foreclose on our assets and we may be forced
to curtail or cease our operations or sell some or all of our assets to
repay the notes.
|
|
·
|
Even if we complete the proposed
transaction, we may be unable to successfully operate our remaining
business.
|
|
·
|
We may be unable to identify
potential business opportunities or successfully operate such new
businesses once identified.
|
|
·
|
If we acquire other companies or
businesses we will be subject to risks that could harm our
business.
|
|
·
|
We have been profitable in the
most recent quarter and four of the last five consecutive quarters, but we
lost money in the previous eighteen consecutive quarters. We may need
additional working capital if we do not maintain profitability, which if
not received, may force us to curtail
operations.
|
|
·
|
The delisting of our common stock
by the American Stock Exchange has limited our stock’s liquidity and could
substantially impair our ability to raise
capital.
|
Any of these factors could affect our
ability to consummate the transaction described herein and cause our actual
results to differ materially from the guidance given at this time. For further
information about the risks of the proposed transaction and our Company, we
refer you to the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 15 as well as
the documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, particularly our Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June
30, 2008 and our Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2007.
There are representations and warranties
contained in the Asset Purchase Agreement that is attached as an appendix and
described herein which were made by the parties to each other as of specific
dates. The assertions embodied in these representations and warranties were made
solely for purposes of the Asset Purchase Agreement and may be subject to
important qualifications and limitations agreed to by the parties in connection
with negotiating its terms. Moreover, certain representations and warranties may
not be accurate or complete as of any specified date because they are subject to
a contractual standard of materiality that is different from certain standards
generally applicable to shareholders or were used for the purpose of allocating
risk between the parties rather than establishing matters as facts. Therefore,
you should not rely on the representations and warranties contained in the Asset
Purchase Agreement as statements of factual information.
We do not assume any obligation to
update information contained in this document, except as required by federal
securities laws. Although this Proxy Statement may remain available on our
website or elsewhere, its continued availability does not indicate that we are
reaffirming or confirming any of the information contained
herein. Neither our website nor its contents are a part of this Proxy
Statement.
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the
special risk considerations described below as well as other information
provided to you or referenced in this Proxy Statement in deciding how to vote on
the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling Business. The special risk
considerations described below are not the only ones we face. For a discussion
of additional risk considerations, we refer to you the documents we file from
time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, particularly our Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 and our Form 10-QSB for the
fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008, which are attached as Appendix
C and Appendix
D
hereto. Additional considerations not presently known to us or that
we currently believe are immaterial may also impair our business operations. If
any of the following special risk considerations actually occur, our business,
financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely
affected, the value of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or
part of your investment.
Special Risk Considerations Regarding
the Proposed Sale of the Tire Recycling
Business:
If we fail to complete the sale of the
Tire Recycling Business, our business may be harmed.
We cannot assure you that the sale of
the Tire Recycling Business will be completed. As a result of our announcement
of the sale of the Tire Recycling Business, third parties may be unwilling to
enter into material agreements with respect to our Tire Recycling Business. New
or existing customers may prefer to enter into agreements with our competitors
who have not expressed an intention to sell their business because customers may
perceive that such relationships are likely to be more stable. If we fail to
complete the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling Business, the failure to
maintain existing business relationships or enter into new ones could adversely
affect our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
If we fail to complete the sale of the
Tire Recycling Business, our liquidity and financial position may be
harmed.
If we are unable to close the sale of
our Tire Recycling Business, we may owe a termination fee (4% of the purchase
price if we or the Purchaser terminates the Asset Purchase Agreement under
certain circumstances related to the sale of our Tire Recycling Business to
another party on superior terms (although, currently, the Board of Directors has
not received a superior offer) or up to $150,000 if we terminate the Asset
Purchase Agreement due to our inability to obtain shareholder approval of the
transaction) that could exhaust our cash reserves and cause us to be unable to
pay our scheduled obligations. In addition, if we are unable to restructure the
terms and maturity of our Laurus obligations we (1) will be unable to meet the
increased monthly principal payments due Laurus scheduled to commence in October
2008 and therefore may be deemed in default under the terms of our agreement
with Laurus who has reserved all rights with respect to such default and who may
exercise its right to foreclose on our assets and (2) anticipate receiving a
“going concern” opinion from our auditors for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2008 which will have a negative impact on our ability to secure additional
future financing.
You will not receive any of the proceeds
from the sale of the Tire Recycling Business.
The purchase price for the assets of the
Tire Recycling Business will be paid directly to us or our creditors. We intend
to pay off our indebtedness with the proceeds of the sale of our Tire Recycling
Business and to use the remaining proceeds to pursue new business opportunities.
Therefore, no proceeds will be received by our shareholders as a result of the
sale.
The Asset Purchase Agreement may expose
us to contingent liabilities.
Under the Asset Purchase Agreement, we
are required to indemnify the LTS Group for the breach or violation of any
representation, warranty or covenant made by us in the Asset Purchase Agreement,
subject to certain limitations and up to a maximum of 5% of the total purchase
price. Significant indemnification claims by the LTS Group could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition.
We will be prohibited from competing
with the Tire Recycling Business on a regional basis for five years from the
date of the closing.
The Asset Purchase Agreement provides
that for a period of five years after the closing of the transaction, we will
not (i) own, manage, operate, join, control or participate in the
ownership, management, operation or control of, or be employed or otherwise
connected as an agent, security holder, consultant, stockholder, subsidiary,
partner or otherwise with any person, firm corporation or business that engages
in any activity that is the same as, similar to, or competitive with the
business of collection, disposal, shredding, processing, recycling or sale of
used tires, including without limitation the production of fuel chips, tire
derived mulch, tire shreds, crumb rubber and other tire derived feedstock,
anywhere within the states of Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas,
Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wisconsin or (ii) sell crumb rubber to any person
who is a customer of ours as of the date of the Asset Purchase
Agreement.
Even if our stockholders approve the
sale of the Tire Recycling Business, we cannot be sure when, or even if, the
sale of the Tire Recycling Business will be completed.
The completion of the sale of the Tire
Recycling Business is subject to the satisfaction of a number of conditions,
including, among others, the requirement that we obtain shareholder approval of
the sale and the requirement that the Purchaser obtain funds sufficient to
complete the transaction on terms and conditions satisfactory to it. In
addition, the Purchaser may terminate the agreement if we do not cure breaches,
if any, of a material provision of the Asset Purchase Agreement within five
business days of notice of such breach. We cannot guarantee that we will be able
to meet the closing conditions of the Asset Purchase Agreement. If we are unable
to meet the closing conditions, the Purchaser is not obligated to purchase the
Tire Recycling Business. We also cannot be sure that other circumstances, for
example, a material adverse event, will not arise that would allow the Purchaser
to terminate the Asset Purchase Agreement prior to closing. If the asset sale is
not approved or does not close, our Board of Directors will be forced to
evaluate other alternatives, which are expected to be less favorable to us than
the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling Business. In addition, we would
likely not have sufficient capital to repay our Laurus indebtedness when it
becomes due and therefore be deemed in default under the terms of our
agreement with Laurus who has reserved all rights with respect to such default
and who may exercise its right to foreclose on our assets
The
Asset Purchase Agreement limits our ability to pursue alternatives to the asset
sale.
The Asset Purchase Agreement contains
provisions that make it more difficult for us to sell our Tire Recycling
Business to a party other than the Purchaser. These provisions include the
general prohibition on soliciting any acquisition proposal or offer for a
competing transaction and the requirement that we pay a termination fee equal to
4% of the purchase price if the Asset Purchase Agreement is terminated in
specified circumstances.
These
provisions could discourage a third party that might have an interest in
acquiring our Tire Recycling Business or our company from considering or
proposing that acquisition, even if that party were prepared to pay
consideration with a higher value than the consideration to be paid by the
Purchaser. Furthermore, the termination fee may result in a potential competing
acquirer offering to pay a lower per share price to acquire our company than it
might otherwise have offered to pay. The payment of the termination fee could
also have an adverse effect on our financial condition.
On
October 1, 2008, the monthly principal payments to Laurus under the terms of our
Credit Facility which matures on June 30, 2009 were scheduled to increase
substantially and if the sale of our Tire Recycling Business is not completed we
may default on these notes.
As
of June 30, 2008, we owed Laurus approximately $12.8 million under a credit
facility which matures on June 30, 2009. On October 1, 2008, our monthly
principal payments were scheduled to increase from $100,000 to $400,000 per
month until maturity. We will not be able to satisfy these monthly
payments through existing cash flow from operations. Therefore, if we
fail to make such payments we may be deemed in default under the terms of our
agreement with Laurus. We are currently in discussions with Laurus
regarding an agreement to extend the term of the credit facility by twelve
months and reduce the monthly principal payments to $100,000 for the remainder
of the existing term and the potential extension term. We have not
reached a formal agreement with Laurus on this matter and we believe such an
agreement, if successful, will require us to pay significant fees in addition to
the issuance of significant additional warrants to purchase our common stock
similar to those previously issued to Laurus. If we are unable to restructure
our remaining principal payments and extend the maturity of our outstanding
Laurus debt or obtain additional financing we may be deemed in default under the terms
of our agreement with Laurus who has reserved all rights with respect to such
default and who may exercise its right to foreclose on our assets. In addition,
our ability to maintain our current level of operations could be
materially and adversely affected and we may be required to adjust our operating
plans. Laurus has verbally agreed to defer our October and November 2008
principal payments pending the closing of the sale of our Tire Recycling
Business prior to November 30, 2008.
By
completing the proposed sale, we will be selling our Tire Recycling Business
which has historically generated substantially all our revenue. In order to
increase revenue, we will
need to achieve sustained profitably of our Welch division and identify and
successfully execute new business initiatives.
We
will be selling our entire Tire Recycling Business which has historically been
the source of substantially all of our revenue. Following the sale of the Tire Recycling
Business, we will have minimal long-term debt and more than $5 million of
available cash. We intend to invest a portion of the net proceeds of this
transaction to grow our Welch Products' business model nationwide and pursue
additional recycling, alternative fuel, alternative energy and other “Green”
business opportunities through our recently announced subsidiary, GreenMan
Renewable Fuel and Alternative Energy, Inc. We believe we will be
able to satisfy our cash requirements through at least fiscal 2010. If Welch is
unable to achieve sustained profitability during fiscal 2009 and we are unable
to obtain additional financing to supplement our cash position, our ability to
maintain our current level of operations could be materially and adversely
affected. There is no guarantee we will be able to achieve sustained
profitability of our Welch Products business or of new business
opportunities.
If
we acquire other companies or businesses we will be subject to risks that could
hurt our business.
A
significant part of our business strategy entails future acquisitions or
significant investments in businesses that offer complementary products and
services. Promising acquisitions are difficult to identify and
complete for a number of reasons. Any acquisitions completed by our company may
be made at a premium over the fair value of the net assets of the acquired
companies and competition may cause us to pay more for an acquired business than
its long-term fair market value. There can be no assurance that we will be able
to complete future acquisitions on terms favorable to us or at all. In addition,
we may not be able to integrate any future acquired businesses, at all or
without significant distraction of management into our ongoing business. In
order to finance acquisitions, it may be necessary for us to issue shares of our
capital stock to the sellers of the acquired businesses and/or to seek
additional funds through public or private financings. Any equity or debt
financing, if available at all, may be on terms which are not favorable to us
and, in the case of an equity financing or the use of our stock to pay for an
acquisition, may result in dilution to our existing stockholders.
APPROVAL OF THE SALE OF THE TIRE RECYCLING
BUSINESS
General
Pursuant to the Asset Purchase
Agreement, we will sell to the Purchaser our Tire Recycling Business, which
includes all of the assets that relate to each of our tire recycling
subsidiaries. Upon consummation of the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling
Business, ownership of the assets held by the tire recycling subsidiaries will
be transferred to the Purchaser. The sale of the Tire Recycling Business will
constitute the sale of substantially all of our assets.
The Parties
GreenMan Technologies,
Inc.
We, GreenMan Technologies, Inc.
(“GreenMan,” “we,” or “us”), operate two facilities that collect, process and
market scrap tires in whole, shredded or granular form. We are headquartered in
Savage, Minnesota and currently operate tire processing
operations in Iowa and Minnesota. We were originally founded
in 1992 and have operated as a Delaware corporation since 1995. Our
core businesses is collecting, processing and marketing scrap tires in whole,
shredded or granular form (the “Tire Recycling Business”).
Welch
Products, which we acquired on October 1, 2007, is headquartered in Carlisle,
Iowa and specializes in the design, development, and manufacturing of
market-branded, recycled-content products and services that provide schools and
municipalities with environmentally responsible products to create safer work
and play environments. Welch's
patented products and processes include playground safety tiles, roadside
anti-vegetation products, construction molds and highway guard-rail rubber
spacer blocks. Through its recent acquisition of Playtribe, Inc., Welch Products
also provides innovative playground design, equipment and installation. Welch
Products had been one of our crumb rubber customers for several
years.
GreenMan
Renewable Fuel and Alternative Energy, Inc.’s primary objective is to pursue
licenses, joint-ventures and long-term contracts with third parties focused on
the commercialization of existing and late-stage development products and
processes in green-based technologies including renewable fuels, alternative
energy and recycled products.
GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota,
Inc.
GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota, Inc.
is a Minnesota corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of
GreenMan. GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota, Inc. operates our tire
processing facility located in Savage, Minnesota.
GreenMan Technologies of Iowa,
Inc.
GreenMan Technologies of Iowa, Inc. is
an Iowa corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of GreenMan. GreenMan
Technologies of Iowa, Inc. operates our tire processing facility located in Des
Moines, Iowa.
Liberty Tire Services, LLC
Liberty Tire Services, LLC (“LTS”) is a
Delaware limited liability company based in
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania that currently operates fourteen scrap
tire processing facilities in the United States. LTS’ principal executive
offices are located at 625
Liberty Avenue, Suite 3100,
Pittsburgh, PA 15222 and its phone number is (412)
562-0148.
Liberty
Tire Services of Ohio,
LLC
Liberty Tire Services of Ohio, LLC (the
“Purchaser”) is a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary
of LTS. The Purchaser will be purchasing our Tire Recycling
Business.
Reasons for the Sale of the Tire Recycling
Business
We believe GreenMan is one of the top
five tire recyclers in the United States. Our current tire processing operations
manage over 12 million tires annually. We are paid a fee to collect,
transport and process scrap tires (i.e., collection/processing revenue) in
whole or two inch or smaller rubber chips which are then sold (i.e., product revenue) as tire-derived
fuel, tire-derived aggregate, or crumb rubber feedstock for playground, athletic
track and field and road surfacing.
Prior
to September 30, 2005, we operated tire processing operations in California,
Georgia, Iowa, Minnesota and Tennessee and operated under agreements to supply,
through our Georgia and Tennessee subsidiaries, whole tires used as alternative
fuel to cement kilns located in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Missouri
and Tennessee. While our Iowa and Minnesota operations have been historically
cash flow positive and performed well, our other operating locations were unable
to obtain sustained profitability. We were required to increase our
level of long term debt in order to sustain these operations as we implemented
cost reduction and revenue enhancing initiatives. These initiatives
were unsuccessful. Due to the magnitude of the continuing operating
losses incurred by our Georgia and Tennessee subsidiaries, which totaled $5.2
million, and our California subsidiary, which totaled $3.2 million, our Board of
Directors determined it to be in the best interest of our company to discontinue
all Southeastern and West coast tire recycling operations and dispose of the
operating assets of these subsidiaries in fiscal 2005 and 2006. As a result, we
reported net losses of approximately $15.2 million and $3.7 million for the
fiscal years ended September 30, 2005 and 2006, respectively.
A majority of the operating losses for
our Tennessee subsidiary were due to rapid market
share growth within the state necessitating us to transport an increasing number
of Tennessee scrap tires to our Georgia facility for processing which resulted
in significant transportation and processing costs. A majority of the operating
losses for our Georgia subsidiary were due to: (1) the negative impact of
processing a significant number of Tennessee sourced tires; (2) a change in the
specifications of our primary customers, which required a smaller product and
resulted in reduced processing capacity and significantly higher operating
costs; and (3) the failure of our equipment to perform in a reliable manner due
to the fact that our older equipment was required to process an increasing
number of scrap tires. A majority of the California operating losses were due to
significantly higher operating costs and the failure of our equipment to perform
in a reliable manner.
In
April 2006, our Board of Directors named Lyle Jensen as President and Chief
Executive Officer succeeding Robert H. Davis, who resigned those
positions. Mr. Jensen implemented a 5-step turnaround plan designed
to: (1) stabilize our business; (2) maximize continuing operations; (3)
successfully renegotiate our existing $9 million credit facility in order to
obtain additional near term capital and gain time to implement our turnaround
plan; (4) finalize the sale of our operations in Tennessee and Georgia; and (5)
aggressively pursue strategic business development opportunities intended to
leverage our existing operations to maximize shareholder value and position
ourselves to retire the significant amount of secured long term debt incurred to
fund our historical losses.
In
June 2006, we entered into a $16 million amended and restated credit facility
with our primary secured lender, Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. (“Laurus”). The new
credit facility consists of a $5 million non-convertible secured revolving note
and an $11 million secured non-convertible term note which both mature on June 30, 2009. We used
approximately $9,972,000 of the term loan proceeds to repay certain existing
debt (including approximately $8.5 million due to Laurus) and to pay
approximately $888,000 in transaction fees associated with the new credit
facility. During the period from July 2006 to June 2007, we only paid
interest on our outstanding Laurus term debt which allowed us to implement steps
1 thorough 4 of our turnaround plan. Our monthly principal payments were
scheduled to increase from $100,000 to $400,000 per month commencing October 1,
2008. We believe we will be unable to make such monthly payments
based on our existing cash flow from operations. If we are unable to
make such payments we may be deemed in default under the terms of our agreement
with Laurus. We are currently in discussions with Laurus regarding an
agreement to extend the term of the credit facility by twelve months and reduce
the monthly principal payments to $100,000 for the remainder of the existing
term and the potential extension term. We have not reached a formal
agreement with Laurus on this matter and we believe such an agreement, if
successful, will require us to pay significant fees in addition to the issuance
of significant additional warrants to purchase our common stock similar to those
previously issued to Laurus. If we are unable to restructure our remaining
principal payments and extend the maturity of our outstanding Laurus debt or
obtain additional financing we may
be deemed in default under the terms of our agreement with Laurus who has
reserved all rights with respect to such default and who may exercise its right
to foreclose on our assets. Laurus has verbally agreed to defer our
October and November 2008 principal payments pending the closing of the sale of
our Tire Recycling Business prior to November 30, 2008.
As
part of our turnaround plan, we acquired Welch Products, Inc. on October 1,
2007. Welch Products, headquartered in Carlisle, Iowa, specializes in
the design, development, and manufacturing of market-branded, recycled-content
products and services that provide schools and municipalities with
environmentally responsible products to create safer work and play environments.
Welch's patented products and
processes include playground safety tiles, roadside anti-vegetation products,
construction molds and highway guard-rail rubber spacer blocks. Through its
recent acquisition of Playtribe, Inc., Welch Products also provides innovative
playground design, equipment and installation. Welch Products had been one of
our crumb rubber customers for several years.
Revenues
associated with Welch Products since the date of acquisition through June 30,
2008 were $2,093,596 and their net operating loss was $686,780. Welch
Products has not yet reached sustained profitability. Since the date of
acquisition, we have made a significant investment in sales and marketing
initiatives intended to promote the Welch patented products and establish market
presence. We estimate Welch will realize revenue growth in
excess of 90% this year as compared to the previous year. Our consolidated
performance will be negatively impacted unless Welch begins generating positive
operating cash flow and achieves profitable status on a sustained basis for all
Welch operations.
In
addition, in September 2008 we announced the formation of a new subsidiary,
GreenMan Renewable Fuel and Alternative Energy, Inc. Our primary
objective for this subsidiary is to pursue licenses, joint-ventures and
long-term contracts focused on the commercialization of existing and late-stage
development products and processes in green-based technologies including
renewable fuels, alternative energy and recycled products. To date, GreenMan
Renewable Fuel and Alternative Energy has generated no revenues nor incurred any
operating expenses.
Background of the Sale of the Tire Recycling
Business
In
response to the belief we would be unable to meet the increased monthly
principal payments to Laurus, which were scheduled to commence on October 1,
2008 and the fact that any material modification to the existing terms and
maturity of the debt would be extremely costly, our Board of Directors began to
actively explore strategic alternatives during the first quarter of fiscal 2007.
Management and members of the Board of Directors have met with over 20 entities
since the first quarter of fiscal 2007 to discuss various potential strategic
alternatives intended to address the pending June 2009 maturity of the Laurus
debt. These entities included various competitors within the scrap tire
recycling industry, companies representing vertical and horizontal integration
opportunities, as well as entities outside our industry who expressed an
interest in a reverse merger with a public entity such as GreenMan. In addition,
in July 2007 we retained Institutional Marketing Services (“IMS”), a full
service investor relations firm, to assist us in identifying additional
potential strategic partners and opportunities.
Throughout
this process, we did not receive any interest in a business combination or
acquisition of our entire company, but we did receive indications of interest
from a third party in selling their molded recycled rubber products business to
us as well as an interest by another third party in purchasing our Tire
Recycling Business on a stand alone basis.
On
October 1, 2007, we acquired Welch Products, Inc. This transaction was
structured as a share exchange in which 100 percent of Welch’s common stock was
exchanged for 8 million shares of our common stock, valued at $2,800,000 based
on the fair market value of the 8 million shares issued in this transaction on
the date of issuance. Revenues associated with Welch Products from
the date of acquisition through June 30, 2008 were $2,093,596 and net operating
loss was $686,780. Our Welch Products division has not yet reached
sustained profitability. Since the date of acquisition, we have made a
significant investment in sales and marketing initiatives intended to promote
the Welch patented products and establish market presence. We
estimate that Welch will realize revenue growth in excess of 90% this
fiscal year as compared to the previous year.
In early 2008, senior management met on
several occasions with representatives of LTS to discuss the potential
acquisition of GreenMan’s Tire Recycling Business by LTS or an affiliate of LTS.
LTS, is a Delaware limited liability company based in
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. LTS currently operates fourteen scrap
tire processing facilities and is the largest tire recycling company in the
United States with revenues exceeding $100 million.
Based on managements’ extensive knowledge of the tire recycling industry and
LTS’ recent history of significant acquisitions within the Midwest, our Board of Directors believed LTS
would be a suitable buyer for our Tire Recycling Business. In April 2008, we
received a non-binding proposal from LTS to purchase the Tire Recycling
Businesses. In June 2008 senior management of LTS gave a presentation to our
Board of Directors regarding a potential transaction.
On July 1, 2008, our Board of Directors
met to discuss the status of the potential transaction with LTS and approved the
execution of a non-binding letter of intent for the purchase of the Tire
Recycling Business by LTS and/or its affiliate. After we executed the
letter of intent with LTS, LTS conducted a financial and business due diligence
review of our Tire Recycling Business, which included various meetings with us
during July and August 2008.
Our
Board of Directors believed the terms of the proposed transaction with LTS were
in the best interest of GreenMan shareholders. To confirm this belief
our Board of Directors decided to obtain independent verification of the
fairness of the transaction. Therefore, during July 2008, management interviewed
seven potential financial advisors to provide an opinion as to the fairness from
a financial perspective (“fairness opinion”) of the consideration to be received
from LTS by GreenMan for the Tire Recycling Business. On August 1, 2008, the
Board of Directors met and approved the hiring of BCC Advisers, a Des Moines, Iowa based firm to provide the fairness
opinion.
During August 2008 we received a draft
agreement that covered the basic terms of the proposed transaction, including
that the purchase price for the Tire Recycling Business would be equal to five
(5) times the Tire Recycling Business’s EBITDA (earnings before interest,
tax, depreciation, and amortization) for the twelve months September 30, 2008,
plus assumption of certain liabilities and subject to certain purchase price
adjustments. We estimate the gross purchase price will
be approximately $26 million. Up to 5% of the total purchase
price (estimated to be $1.3 million) may be subject to indemnification
claims by LTS or Purchaser.
Throughout the following weeks, we and
our advisors negotiated the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement with LTS and
its advisors. The terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement negotiated by the
parties were consistent with prior discussions between GreenMan and
LTS. On September 9, 2008, we finalized the terms of the Asset
Purchase Agreement and LTS indicated that it had received a financing commitment
that would provide sufficient funding for payment of the purchase price to us
upon the closing of the proposed transaction.
On September 11, 2008, our Board of
Directors convened a meeting to review the final Asset Purchase Agreement and
the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling Business in accordance with the terms
and conditions set forth in the Asset Purchase Agreement. All of our directors
participated in this meeting in addition to members of our management team. In
accordance with the terms of its engagement letter with us, BCC Advisers, at the
request of our Board of Directors delivered an oral opinion (which opinion was
subsequently confirmed in writing) to our Board of Directors at a meeting. The
opinion stated that, on the basis of its analyses and review and in reliance on
the accuracy and completeness of the information furnished to it and subject to
the limitations, qualifications and assumptions noted in its opinion, as of
September 11, 2008, the estimated $26 million consideration to be received
from the sale of the Tire Recycling Business was adequate consideration and that
the proposed transaction was fair to GreenMan’s shareholders from a financial
point of view. Based on this information and after additional discussions, the
Board of Directors determined that entry into the Asset Purchase Agreement and
completion of the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling Business were in the best
interests of the Company and our shareholders. Our Board of Directors then
approved (i) the Asset Purchase Agreement, (ii) the related
transaction agreements, and (iii) the proposed sale of our Tire Recycling
Business to LTS on the terms set forth in those agreements, and authorized
management to execute the transaction agreements on our
behalf.
On September 12, 2008, we executed the
Asset Purchase Agreement with LTS and publicly announced the agreement on
September 15, 2008.
Effect of the Sale of the Tire Recycling
Business
If our shareholders approve the sale of
the Tire Recycling Business, we will seek to complete the sale. We will use the
proceeds of the sale of the Tire Recycling Business to repay
approximately $19 million of outstanding obligations, including
approximately $13 million due Laurus and approximately $6 million of transaction
related debt and payables and other obligations (consisting of $4 million in
capital lease obligations and notes payable of the Tire Recycling Subsidiaries,
$1.5 million of taxes due as a result of the sale of the Tire Recycling Business
and $.5 in notes payable by GreenMan). Approximately $1.3 million of the
purchase price will be subject to indemnification claims which may be brought by
LTS or the Purchaser. The purchase price will also be subject to adjustment
based upon net working capital levels at closing. We estimate our net
cash after closing will exceed $5 million. We intend to use such cash
to grow our Welch Products' business model nationwide and pursue additional
recycling, alternative fuel, alternative energy and other “Green” business
opportunities that are intended to increase shareholder value.
We believe that if we are unable to
successfully complete the sale of our Tire Recycling Business and are unable to
restructure the terms and maturity of our Laurus obligations on acceptable terms
we (1) will be unable to meet the increased monthly principal payments due
Laurus scheduled to commence in October 2008 and therefore may be deemed to be
in default under the terms of our agreement with Laurus, who has reserved all
rights with respect to such default and who may exercise its right to foreclose
on our assets; (2) anticipate receiving a “going concern” opinion from our
auditors for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 which will have a negative
impact on our ability to secure additional future financing; and (3) may, under
certain circumstances, owe a termination fee to Purchaser.
Laurus Financing
On June 30, 2006, we entered into a $16
million amended and restated credit facility with Laurus Master Fund,
Ltd. (“Laurus”) (the “Credit
Facility”). The Credit Facility consists of a $5 million non-convertible secured
revolving note and an $11 million secured non-convertible term
note.
The revolving note has a term of three
years from the closing, and bears interest on any outstanding amounts at the
prime rate published in The Wall Street Journal from time to time plus 2%, with
a minimum rate of 8%. The amount we may borrow at any time under the revolving
note is based on our eligible accounts receivable and our eligible inventory
with an advance rate equal to 90% of our eligible accounts receivable (90 days
or less) and 50% of finished goods inventory up to a maximum of $5 million less
such reserves as Laurus may reasonably in its good faith judgment deem necessary
from time to time.
The term note has a maturity date of
June 30, 2009 and bears interest at the prime rate published in The Wall Street
Journal from time to time plus 2% with a minimum rate of 8%. Interest on the
loan is payable monthly commencing August 1, 2006. Principal will be amortized
over the term of the loan, commencing on July 2, 2007, with minimum monthly
payments of principal as follows: (i) for the period commencing on July 2, 2007
through June 2008, minimum payments of $150,000; (ii) for the period from July
2008 through June 2009, minimum payments of $400,000; and (iii) the balance of
the principal shall be payable on the maturity date. In May 2007, Laurus agreed
to reduce the monthly principal payments required under Credit Facility during
the period of July 2007 to June 2008 from $150,000 to $100,000 per month. Laurus
also agreed to reduce the monthly principal payments required during the period
of July 2008 to September 2008 from $400,000 to $100,000 per
month. Our monthly principal payments are scheduled to increase from
$100,000 to $400,000 per month on October 1, 2008. We will not be able to
satisfy these monthly payments through existing cash flow from operations and
therefore we may be deemed in default under the terms of our agreement with
Laurus.
We
are currently in discussions with Laurus regarding an agreement to extend the
term of the credit facility by twelve months and reduce the monthly principal
payments to $100,000 for the remainder of the existing term and the potential
extension term. We have not reached a formal agreement with Laurus on
this matter and we believe such an agreement, if successful, will require us to
pay significant fees in addition to the issuance of significant additional
warrants to purchase our common stock similar to those previously issued to
Laurus. If we are unable to restructure our remaining principal payments and
extend the maturity of our outstanding Laurus debt or obtain additional
financing we may be deemed in
default under the terms of our agreement with Laurus who has reserved all rights
with respect to such default and who may exercise its right to foreclose on our
assets. In addition, our ability to maintain our current level of
operations could be materially and adversely affected and we may be required to
adjust our operating plans. Laurus has verbally agreed to defer our October and
November 2008 principal payments pending the closing of the sale of our Tire
Recycling Business prior to November 30, 2008.
In connection with the Credit Facility,
we also issued to Laurus a warrant to purchase up to 3,586,429 shares of our
common stock at an exercise price equal to $.01 per share. Laurus has agreed
that it will not, on any trading day, be permitted to sell any common stock
acquired upon exercise of this warrant in excess of 10% of the aggregate number
of shares of the common stock traded on such trading day. Previously issued
warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,380,000 shares of our common stock were
canceled as part of these transactions. The amount of our common stock Laurus
may hold at any given time is limited to no more than 4.99% of our outstanding
capital stock. This limitation may be waived by Laurus upon 61 days notice to us
and does not apply if an event of default occurs and is continuing under the
Credit Facility.
On January 25, 2007, we filed the
registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, relating to
the 3,586,429 shares underlying the June 30, 2006 warrant as well as 553,997
shares issuable to another shareholder upon exercise of a warrant. The
registration statement was declared effective on February 6,
2007.
Subject to applicable cure periods,
amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility are subject to acceleration upon
certain events of default, including: (i) any failure to pay when due any amount
we owe under the New Credit Facility; (ii) any material breach by us of any
other covenant made to Laurus; (iii) any misrepresentation, in any material
respect, made by us to Laurus in the documents governing the New Credit
Facility; (iv) the institution of certain bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings
by or against us; (v) the entry of certain monetary judgments greater than
$50,000 against us that are not paid or vacated for a period of 30 business
days; (vi) suspensions of trading of our common stock; (vii) any failure to
deliver shares of common stock upon exercise of the warrant; (viii) certain
defaults under agreements related to any of our other indebtedness; and (ix)
changes of control of our company. Substantial fees and penalties are payable to
Laurus in the event of a default.
Our obligations under the Credit
Facility are secured by first priority security interests in all of the assets
of our company and all of the assets of our GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota,
Inc. and GreenMan Technologies of Iowa, Inc. subsidiaries, as well as by pledges
of the capital stock of those subsidiaries. In January 2008, we granted Laurus
additional security interests in the assets of Welch Products and its
subsidiaries, which increased our borrowing base under the revolving note
described above.
Opinion of Financial Advisor to the
Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors retained BCC
Advisers to provide an opinion as to the fairness (from a financial point of
view) of the consideration to be received by GreenMan from the sale to the
Purchaser of the Tire Recycling Business (the “Transaction”). As part of its consulting business, BCC
Advisers is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and
securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions and for other corporate
and/or personal purposes.
In accordance with the terms of its
engagement letter with us, BCC Advisers, at the request of our Board of
Directors delivered an oral opinion (which opinion was subsequently confirmed in
writing) to our Board of Directors at a meeting of the Board of Directors on
September 11, 2008. The opinion stated that, on the basis of its analyses and
review and in reliance on the accuracy and completeness of the information
furnished to it and subject to the limitations, qualifications and assumptions
noted below and in the full text of its opinion, as of September 11, 2008, the
estimated $26 million consideration to be received from the sale of the
Tire Recycling Business (the “Transaction Consideration”) is adequate
consideration and that the proposed transaction is fair to our shareholders from
a financial point of view.
Pursuant to BCC Advisers’ engagement
letter, the opinion does not constitute a recommendation to our Board of
Directors as to whether it is advisable to enter into the Asset Purchase
Agreement or as to the amount of the Transaction Consideration, which was
determined in arm’s length negotiations between LTS, the Purchaser and us. We
imposed no restrictions or limitations upon BCC Advisers’ with respect to the
investigations made or the procedures followed by BCC Advisers in rendering its
opinion.
The full text of BCC Advisers’ opinion,
which sets forth, among other things, assumptions made, procedures followed,
matters considered and limitations on the scope of the review undertaken by BCC
Advisers in rendering its opinion, is attached as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement and is
incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. You are urged to, and you
should, read the BCC Advisers opinion carefully and in its entirety. The summary
of the BCC Advisers opinion in this Proxy Statement is qualified in its entirety
by reference to the full text of the BCC Advisers opinion.
BCC Advisers’ opinion was provided for
the benefit and use of our Board of Directors in connection with its evaluation
of the sale of our Tire Recycling Business. BCC Advisers’ opinion addresses only
the fairness to our stockholders, from a financial point of view, of the
Transaction Consideration. Because BCC Advisers’ opinion addresses only the
fairness of the Transaction Consideration, it did not express any views on any
other terms of the sale of the Tire Recycling Business, including without
limitation any possible reduction in the total consideration received by us in
the transaction based upon the adjustments provided for in the Asset Purchase
Agreement or otherwise. In addition, BCC Advisers did not express any
opinion about the fairness of the amount or nature of any compensation to any of
our officers, directors or employees or the Tire Recycling Business, or class of
such persons, relative to the compensation to us.
BCC Advisers’ opinion does not address
the merits of our entering into the Asset Purchase Agreement as compared to any
alternative business transaction or strategy that might have been available to
us or our underlying business decision to effect the sale of the Tire Recycling
Business, nor does it address the tax consequences to us arising from the sale
of the Tire Recycling Business. BCC Advisers’ opinion does not
constitute a recommendation to any shareholder as to how such shareholder should
vote or act on any matter relating to the sale of the Tire Recycling Business.
The opinion does not address the value of our company or our viability as a
going concern after the consummation of the sale of the Tire Recycling Business.
In addition, BCC Advisers did not opine as to the market value or the prices at
which any of our securities may trade at any time in the
future.
BCC Advisers’ opinion spoke only as of
the date it was rendered, was based on the economic, market and other conditions
as they existed and information with which it was supplied as of such date and
was without regard to any market, economic, financial, legal, tax or other
circumstances or event of any kind or nature which might exist or occur after
such date. Unless otherwise noted, all of BCC Advisers’ analyses were performed
based on information available as of September 10, 2008.
For purposes of its opinion, BCC
Advisers, among other things:
|
1.
|
Reviewed
financial and other information related to GreenMan that was publicly
available, including our Annual Reports on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
years ended September 30, 2003 through September 30, 2007 and Quarterly
Reports on Form 10-QSB for nine-month periods ended June 30, 2007 and June
30, 2008;
|
|
2.
|
Reviewed
unaudited financial statements pertaining to our operations prepared by us
for the ten months ended July 31, 2008, which we identified as being the
most current financial statements
available;
|
|
3.
|
Considered
information provided during discussions with our
management;
|
|
4.
|
Reviewed
the draft Asset Purchase Agreement, dated September 5,
2008;
|
|
5.
|
Spoke
with certain members of the management of GreenMan and the Purchaser
regarding the operations, financial condition, future prospects, and
projected operations and performance of the Tire Recycling
Subsidiaries;
|
|
6.
|
Visited
our manufacturing plant in Savage,
Minnesota;
|
|
7.
|
Reviewed
financial forecasts and projections prepared by our management for the
years ended September 30, 2009 through September 30, 2012;
and
|
|
8.
|
Compared
certain financial data of GreenMan with various other companies whose
securities are traded in public markets, reviewed prices paid in certain
other business combinations and conducted such other financial studies,
analyses and investigations as BCC Advisers deemed appropriate for
purposes of the opinion.
|
In
rendering the opinion, BCC Advisers noted that it relied upon and assumed the
accuracy and completeness of all the financial and other information that was
available from public sources, that was provided by our management, or that was
otherwise reviewed by BCC Advisers. BCC Advisers further noted that
it relied on representations that the financial projections supplied by us had
been reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently available
estimates and judgments of our management as to the future operating and
financial performance of GreenMan. BCC Advisers assumed no
responsibility for making an independent evaluation of any assets or liabilities
or for making any independent verification of any of the information reviewed by
us. BCC Advisers relied upon and assumed, without independent
verification, that there have been no material changes in the assets,
liabilities, financial condition, results of operations, or prospects of
GreenMan since the date of the most recent financial statements provided to BCC
Advisers, and that there was no information nor were there any facts that would
make any of the information reviewed by BCC Advisers incomplete or
misleading. Furthermore, BCC Advisers undertook no independent
analysis of any potential or actual litigation, regulatory action, possible
unasserted claims, or other contingent liabilities to which GreenMan may be
subject.
BCC
Advisers relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that (a) the
representations and warranties of all parties to the Asset Purchase Agreement
and all other related documents and instruments that are referred to therein are
true and correct, (b) each party to all such agreements will fully and timely
perform all of the covenants and agreements required to be performed by such
party, (c) all conditions to the consummation of the Transaction will be
satisfied without waiver thereof, and (d) the Transaction will be consummated in
a timely manner in accordance with the terms described in the Asset Purchase
Agreement, without any amendments or modifications thereto. BCC
Advisers also relied upon and assumed, without verification, that (i) the
Transaction will be consummated in a manner that complies in all respects with
all applicable federal and state statutes, rules and regulations, and (ii) all
governmental, regulatory, and other consents and approvals necessary for the
consummation of the Transaction will be obtained and that no delay, limitations,
restrictions or conditions will be imposed or amendments, modifications or
waivers made that would result in the disposition of any material portion of the
assets of GreenMan or any subsidiary, or otherwise have an adverse effect on
GreenMan or any subsidiary or any expected benefits of the
Transaction. In addition, BCC Advisers relied upon and assumed,
without independent verification, that the terms of the final form of the Asset
Purchase Agreement will not differ in any material respect from those reflected
in the draft of the Asset Purchase Agreement identified in item 4 above or
otherwise described to BCC Advisers by our representatives.
BCC Advisers did not (a) initiate any
discussions with, or solicit any indications from, third parties with respect to
the Transaction or any alternatives to the Transaction, (b) negotiate the terms
of the Transaction, or (c) advise the Board of Directors or any other party with
respect to alternatives to the Transaction.
The opinion provided by BCC Advisers
was furnished for the use and benefit of our Board of Directors in connection
with its consideration of the Transaction and was not intended to be used, and
may not be used, for any other purpose without BCC’s prior written
consent. The opinion should not be construed as creating any
fiduciary duty on BCC’s part to any party. The opinion was not
intended to be, and does not constitute, a recommendation to the Board of
Directors, any security holder or any other person as to whether to enter into
the Transaction or how to act or vote with respect to any matter relating to the
Transaction.
The opinion provided by BCC Advisers
was based on economic, market, financial and other conditions as they exist on,
and on the information made available to BCC Advisers, as of the date of the
opinion. Although subsequent developments may affect the opinion, BCC
Advisers has no obligation to update, revise or reaffirm the
opinion. The opinion did not address the relative merits of the
Transaction contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement and the other business
strategies being considered by our Board of Directors, nor did it address the
decision to proceed with the Transaction contemplated by the Asset Purchase
Agreement. The opinion did not constitute a recommendation to the
Board of Directors thereof as to whether it is advisable to enter into the Asset
Purchase Agreement or as to the consideration that the Purchaser should pay to
acquire the assets of the Tire Recycling Business.
The following is a brief summary of the
material analyses performed by BCC Advisers in connection with the preparation
of its opinion presented to our Board of Directors at its meeting held on
September 11, 2008.
Analysis
BCC Advisers analyzed and performed a
valuation of our Tire Recycling Business. BCC Advisers compared the
results of their valuation against the expected proceeds to us from the sale of
the Tire Recycling Business. BCC concluded that based on their
analysis, the expected proceeds to us exceeded the value of the Tire Recycling
Business.
BCC Advisers also analyzed and performed
a valuation of the operations of our Welch Products business, which we will
retain.
BCC Advisers then compared the expected
proceeds to us of the sale of the Tire Recycling Business plus the value of our
Welch Products business against the current total market value of our
outstanding shares. BCC Advisers determined that the purchase price
plus the value of our ongoing business exceeded the current market value of our
outstanding shares. Based on this analysis, BCC Advisers concluded
that the value of our company after the sale of the Tire Recycling Business will
exceed the value of our company prior to such sale.
Conclusion
Based upon the analyses described
above, and such other factors as it deemed relevant, BCC Advisers was of the
opinion that the aggregate consideration to be paid by Purchaser pursuant to the
Asset Purchase Agreement is adequate consideration and that the Transaction is
fair to the shareholders of GreenMan from a financial point of
view.
Pursuant to our engagement letter with
BCC Advisers, we paid BCC Advisers a fee of $36,000 upon delivery of its
fairness opinion to our Board of Directors. In addition to any fees for
professional services, we have agreed to reimburse BCC Advisers, upon request,
for certain reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with BCC
Advisers carrying out the terms of the engagement letter.
The foregoing summary does not purport
to be a complete description of the analyses performed by BCC Advisers or the
terms of its engagement by us. The foregoing summary of the analyses performed
by BCC Advisers is qualified in its entirety by reference to the opinion of BCC
Advisers attached as Appendix B to this Proxy
Statement.
The Asset Purchase
Agreement
The following is a description of the
material terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement. The following description does
not purport to describe all of the terms and conditions of the Asset Purchase
Agreement. The full text of the Asset Purchase Agreement is attached to this
proxy statement as Appendix A and is incorporated by reference. You
are urged to read the Asset Purchase Agreement in its entirety because it is the
legal document that governs the terms and conditions of the proposed sale of the
Tire Recycling Business.
Structure
Our Tire Recycling Business is operated
by two of our wholly owned subsidiaries, GreenMan Technologies of Iowa,
Inc., and GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota, Inc. (the “Tire Recycling Subsidiaries”).
The transaction is structured as the sale of substantially all of the assets of
the Tire Recycling Subsidiaries by us to the Purchaser, a subsidiary of LTS. The
assets of our Tire Recycling Subsidiaries will be free of liens and encumbrances
other than certain assumed liabilities.
Effective Time
The closing of the transaction is
anticipated to occur shortly after we obtain shareholder approval and satisfy
all other conditions to Closing.
Purchase Price
Pursuant to the Asset Purchase
Agreement, Purchaser has agreed to pay an amount equal to five dollars ($5.00)
for each dollar of EBITDA for the Tire Recycling Business for the twelve month
period commencing on October 1, 2007 and ending on September 30, 2008, minus a
reduction to the purchase price of $492,000, plus the assumption of certain
assumed liabilities and minus all outstanding indebtedness of the Tire Recycling
Business to the extent included in the assumed liabilities (the “Purchase
Price”). EBITDA for the Tire Recycling Business means the
earnings of the Tire Recycling Business from operations before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization, determined solely in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
derived from the unaudited segmented income statement for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2008 included in the unaudited segmented financial
statements of the Tire Recycling Subsidiaries at September 30, 2008 and for the
fiscal year then ended.
The
Purchaser will withhold $500,000
of the Purchase Price for a period of one year from the closing (the “Closing”)
to satisfy potential indemnification obligations owed by us to the LTS
Group. One-half of this amount, less any amounts subject to claims by
the LTS Group, will be released 180 days after Closing. The Purchase
Price is also subject to an adjustment based on the final working capital of the
Tire Recycling Subsidiaries at Closing and a true-up based on a review by the
Purchaser of the determination of EBITDA used to calculate the Purchase Price.
Purchaser will withhold $250,000 of the Purchase Price until the statement of
EBITDA for the Tire Recycling Business and the working capital statement as of
the Closing have been finalized.
At the closing of the sale of the Tire
Recycling Business, approximately $19 million of the purchase price will be used
to pay down outstanding obligations, including approximately $13 million
due our primary secured lender, Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. (“Laurus”) and
approximately $6 million of transaction related and other obligations
(consisting of $4 million in capital lease obligations and notes payable of the
Tire Recycling Subsidiaries, $1.5 million of taxes due as a result of the sale
of the Tire Recycling Business and $.5 in notes payable by GreenMan).
Certain assets and liabilities related
to the Tire Recycling Business are excluded from the sale and
include:
|
·
|
All cash held by the Tire
Recycling Subsidiaries and all accounts receivable owed to the Tire
Recycling Subsidiaries from GreenMan or any of its
affiliates;
|
|
·
|
All rights to the names “GreenMan
Technologies of Iowa” and “GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota,” subject to
a license agreement providing the Purchaser with a limited right to use
such names;
|
|
·
|
Liabilities for claims for
breaches of representations or warranties or product liability with
respect to any product shipped or manufactured, or any services provided,
prior to the Closing;
|
|
·
|
Liabilities of the Tire Recycling
Subsidiaries to any related
party;
|
|
·
|
Liabilities related to the
transaction;
|
|
·
|
Liabilities for any taxes arising
as a result of operations prior to the Closing or arising as a result of
the sale of the Tire Recycling
Business;
|
|
·
|
Liabilities attributable to assets
retained by us, those incurred by us outside the ordinary course of
business or inconsistent with past practice and those not clearly
identified in contracts and governmental authorizations to be transferred
to the Purchaser;
|
|
·
|
Liabilities under employee benefit
plans and other liabilities related to employees and former employees of
the Tire Recycling
Subsidiaries;
|
|
·
|
Indebtedness of the Tire Recycling
Subsidiaries, except for indebtedness specifically assumed by the
Purchaser;
|
|
·
|
Liabilities related to legal
proceedings that exist as of the Closing;
and
|
|
·
|
Environmental liabilities related
to the period prior to the
Closing.
|
We have agreed to customary covenants
that from the date of the Asset Purchase Agreement through the effective time of
the Closing that require us to, among other things:
|
·
|
provide Purchaser with access
during normal business hours to our properties, books, tax returns,
contracts, commitments, records, officers, other personnel and accountants
related to the Tire Recycling
Business;
|
|
·
|
conduct our Tire Recycling
Business in the ordinary course and consistent with past
practice;
|
|
·
|
not accelerate any income or defer
any expenses that would increase EBITDA during the period commencing
October 1, 2007 and ending September 30, 2008 in any manner inconsistent
with historical results or which would cause EBITDA to be unsustainable
after such period;
|
|
·
|
maintain the purchased assets and
assumed liabilities in a manner consistent with past
practices;
|
|
·
|
use commercially reasonable
efforts to comply with the provisions of all contracts, governmental
authorizations and legal
requirements;
|
|
·
|
use our commercially reasonable
best efforts to keep the business organization intact, keep available the
services of our present employees and preserve the goodwill of our
suppliers, customers and other third parties having business relationships
with us;
|
|
·
|
maintain in full force and effect
insurance policies related to our Tire Recycling
Business;
|
|
·
|
refrain from entering into certain
agreements or transactions outside of the ordinary course of business;
and
|
|
·
|
confer with Purchaser prior to
implementing operational decisions of a material
nature.
|
Employee Matters
Immediately after the Closing, or prior
to but contingent upon the Closing, the Purchaser shall extend offers of
employment to all full-time employees of the Tire Recycling Business, subject to
reasonable pre-employment screenings by Purchaser.
In addition, the Purchaser has offered
employment to Mark Maust, the current President of both GreenMan Technologies of
Minnesota, Inc. and GreenMan Technologies of Iowa, Inc.
Representations and
Warranties
The Asset Purchase Agreement contains
customary representations and warranties made by us to the LTS Group and by the
LTS Group to us for purposes of allocating the risks associated with the sale of
the Tire Recycling Business. The assertions embodied in the representations and
warranties made by us are qualified by information set forth in a confidential
disclosure schedule that was delivered in connection with the execution of the
Asset Purchase Agreement. While we do not believe that the disclosure schedule
contains information that securities laws require us to publicly disclose, other
than information that is being disclosed in this Proxy Statement, the disclosure
schedule may contain information that modifies, qualifies and creates exceptions
to the representations and warranties set forth in the Asset Purchase Agreement.
Accordingly, you should not rely on any of these representations and warranties
as characterizations of the actual state of facts, since they may be modified in
important respects by the underlying disclosure schedule. Moreover, information
concerning the subject matter of the representations and warranties may have
changed since the date of the Asset Purchase Agreement, which subsequent
information may or may not be fully reflected in the disclosure schedule we
delivered to the LTS Group at signing and which may not be delivered by us until
the Closing and the consummation of the sale of the Tire Recycling
Business.
The representations and warranties made
by the parties must be accurate in all material respects as of the date of the
Asset Purchase Agreement and as of the time of the Closing, except for those
representations and warranties that relate to a specific date, which must be
accurate in all material respects as of such date.
Closing Conditions
Purchaser’s
Conditions. The
Purchaser’s obligation to complete the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling
Business is subject to certain conditions, including among other
things:
|
·
|
the accuracy in all material
respects of all of our representations and warranties in the Asset
Purchase Agreement;
|
|
·
|
our performance in all material
respects of all of our covenants and obligations under the Asset Purchase
Agreement to be performed or complied with by us prior to the completion
of the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling
Business;
|
|
·
|
no legal requirement shall be in
effect that prohibits the completion of the proposed sale of the Tire
Recycling Business, and no legal proceeding shall be pending challenging
the lawfulness of the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling
Business;
|
|
·
|
between the date of the Asset
Purchase Agreement and the Closing, no change, event, development or
occurrence shall have occurred which has had or would reasonably be
expected to have a material adverse effect on the Tire Recycling Business
or the assets being purchased, results of operations, liabilities, or
condition, financial or otherwise, of the Tire Recycling Subsidiaries,
taken together as a whole;
|
|
·
|
the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of the votes represented by the outstanding shares
of our common stock approving the sale of our Tire Recycling
Business;
|
|
·
|
Purchaser shall have received all
governmental authorizations necessary to own and operate the purchased
assets and the Tire Recycling
Business;
|
|
·
|
that Mark Maust shall have
executed and delivered to Purchaser an employment agreement containing
terms acceptable to Purchaser;
|
|
·
|
Purchaser
has received copies of the payoff letters in form and substance reasonably
acceptable to Purchaser, stating that all encumbrances held by such
creditors shall be released upon payment at the closing of the
transaction;
|
|
·
|
Purchaser
shall have entered into a lease for each facility currently leased by
either Tire Recycling Subsidiary;
|
|
·
|
Purchaser
shall have obtained on terms and conditions satisfactory to it funds
sufficient to complete the
transaction;
|
|
·
|
Purchaser or GreenMan, as
applicable, shall have received (x) a Waste Tire Facility Permit from the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, (y) a Solid Waste Facility License
from Scott County Community Development Division, Environmental Health
Department and (z) a Permit for Waste Tire Processing from the State of
Iowa, Department of Natural Resources, as required for Purchaser to own
and operate the Tire Recycling Business after the closing;
and
|
|
·
|
all other reasonable and customary
consents and approvals as
required.
|
Our
Conditions. Our
obligation to complete the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling Business is
subject to certain conditions, including, among other
things:
|
·
|
the accuracy in all material
respects of all of the LTS Group’s representations and warranties
contained in the Asset Purchase
Agreement;
|
|
·
|
the LTS Group’s performance in all
material respects of all of its covenants and obligations under the Asset
Purchase Agreement to be performed or complied with by the LTS Group prior
to the completion of the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling
Business;
|
|
·
|
no legal requirement shall be in
effect that prohibits the completion of the proposed sale of the Tire
Recycling Business, and no legal proceeding shall be pending challenging
the lawfulness of the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling
Business;
|
|
·
|
the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of the votes represented by the outstanding shares
of our common stock approving the sale of our Tire Recycling Business;
and
|
|
·
|
all other reasonable and customary
consents and approvals as
required.
|
No Solicitation of Competitive Proposals
and Board Recommendation of Sale of the Tire Recycling
Business
Under the terms of the Asset Purchase
Agreement, we have agreed to immediately cease any discussions with any third
party other than the LTS Group with respect to any sale of our Tire Recycling
Business. In addition, we have agreed not to directly or indirectly solicit,
initiate or encourage any inquiries or proposals regarding any acquisition
proposal or participate in any discussions or negotiations regarding, or furnish
to any person any information with respect of, or take any other action to
facilitate, any acquisition proposal. An acquisition proposal is any
inquiry, offer or proposal by any person, other than the LTS Group, to acquire
all or any material portion of our assets or the assets of the Tire Recycling
Subsidiaries or any of our capital stock or the capital stock of the Tire
Recycling Subsidiaries.
Consistent with the requirements of Rule
14e-2(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, our Board of Directors may
furnish information to or enter into discussions or negotiations with a person
who makes an unsolicited bona fide acquisition proposal, but only to the extent
that the Board of Directors determines in good faith, after consultation with
outside counsel, that failure to take such action would be a breach of its
fiduciary duties and that such alternative proposal may lead to a transaction
that would, if consummated, result in a transaction more favorable to our
shareholders from a financial point of view than the proposed transaction with
the Purchaser. We have agreed to notify the Purchaser of any such
alternative proposal and to keep the Purchaser informed of any material changes
to any such proposal.
Our Board of Directors may not (i)
withdraw or modify, or propose to withdraw or modify, in any manner adverse to
the Purchaser, its approval or recommendation of the sale of the Tire Recycling
Business to the Purchaser, (ii) approve, adopt or recommend, or propose to
approve, adopt or recommend, an acquisition proposal, or (iii) approve or
recommend, or propose to approve or recommend, or cause or permit any of the
Tire Recycling Subsidiaries to enter into any letter of intent, agreement in
principle, memorandum of understanding, acquisition agreement or other agreement
with respect to an acquisition proposal, provided, however, our Board of
Directors may take such actions if:
|
·
|
Our
Board of Directors, after consultation with outside legal counsel,
determines in good faith that the failure to take such action would be a
breach of its fiduciary duties under applicable
law;
|
|
·
|
Our
Board of Directors determines in good faith that such third party
acquisition proposal may lead to a transaction that would, if consummated,
result in a transaction more favorable to our shareholders from a
financial point of view than the proposed sale of our Tire Recycling
Business; and
|
|
·
|
Prior
to taking such action we provide the Purchaser with four days’ prior
written notice of our intent to take such
action.
|
Pursuant to the Asset Purchase
Agreement, we have agreed that for a period of five years from the Closing
neither we nor any of our affiliates will, directly or indirectly, (i)
own, manage, operate, join, control or participate in the ownership, management,
operation or control of, or be employed or otherwise connected as an agent,
security holder, consultant, stockholder, subsidiary, partner or otherwise with,
any person, firm, corporation or business that engages in any activity that is
the same as, similar to, or competitive with our business of collection,
disposal, shredding, processing, recycling or sale of used tires including
without limitation the production of tire derived fuel chips, tire derived
mulch, tire shreds, crumb rubber and any other byproducts of used tires (the
“Used Tire Business”), anywhere within the states of Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois,
Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and
Wisconsin (the “Territory”) or (ii) sell crumb rubber to any person who is a
customer of the Tire Recycling Business as of the date of the Asset Purchase
Agreement; provided,
however, that such covenant shall not prohibit us from purchasing tire
derived feedstock for manufacturing, marketing, selling and otherwise dealing
with end-products (excluding tire derived mulch and crumb rubber for fields) and
alternative fuel and energy made from or containing used tires, tire shreds,
tire chips, crumb rubber and any other byproducts of used tires.
In addition, for a period of five years
from the Closing, we have agreed that neither we nor any of our subsidiaries
will, directly or indirectly, (i) solicit the business related to
the Used Tire Business within the Territory of any person who is a customer of
ours at the Closing; (ii) cause, induce or attempt to cause or induce any
customer, supplier, licensee, licensor, franchisee, employee, consultant or
other business relation of Purchaser to cease doing business related to the Used
Tire Business with Purchaser, to deal with any competitor of Purchaser related
to the Used Tire Business or in any way interfere with its relationship with
Purchaser related to the Used Tire Business; (iii) cause, induce or attempt
to cause or induce any customer, supplier, licensee, licensor, franchisee,
employee, consultant or other business relation of ours on the Closing or within
the year preceding the Closing to cease doing business related to the Used Tire
Business with Purchaser, to deal with any competitor of Purchaser related to the
Used Tire Business or in any way interfere with its relationship with Purchaser
related to the Used Tire Business; or (iv) hire, retain or attempt to hire
or retain any employee or independent contractor of Purchaser or its Affiliates
related to the Used Tire Business or in any way interfere with the relationship
between Purchaser and any of its employees or independent contractors in
connection with the Used Tire Business.
Termination
The Asset Purchase Agreement may be
terminated at any time prior to the date of the Closing by:
|
·
|
mutual consent of the
parties;
|
|
·
|
either party if the other party
has failed to satisfy any of the closing conditions required to be
satisfied by such party prior to
Closing;
|
|
·
|
either party if the other party
has committed a material breach of any provision of the Asset Purchase
Agreement and such breach has not be cured by such party within five
business days of receipt of notice of such
breach;
|
|
·
|
us, if our Board of Directors, in
compliance with the requirements of the Asset Purchase Agreement, decides
to enter into a binding written agreement concerning an acquisition
proposed by a third party is superior to the terms of the proposed sale of
the Tire Recycling Business provided that we notify the Purchaser in
writing of our intent to enter into such an
agreement;
|
|
·
|
by Purchaser, if our Board of
Directors withdraws or modifies its approval of the proposed sale of the
Tire Recycling Business, approves, adopts or recommends another
acquisition proposal, or approves or recommends that we enter into any
agreement with respect to another acquisition proposal, or proposes to do
any of the foregoing, or if we breach any of the material exclusivity
provisions of the Asset Purchase Agreement, subject to the right of our
Board of Directors to terminate the Asset Purchase Agreement to accept a
superior proposal, as described above;
or
|
|
·
|
either party, if our shareholders
have not approved the sale of the Tire Recycling
Business.
|
Termination Fee
Under the terms of the Asset Purchase
Agreement, we have agreed to pay Purchaser a termination fee equal to 4% of the
purchase price (approximately $1.04 million) if:
|
·
|
we terminate the Asset Purchase
Agreement due to a determination by our Board of Directors to enter into a
binding written agreement concerning an acquisition proposal by a third
party that is superior to the terms of the proposed sale of the Tire
Recycling Business; or
|
|
·
|
Purchaser terminates the Asset
Purchase Agreement due to a breach by us of our obligations under the
Asset Purchase Agreement not to withdraw or modify our approval or
recommendation of the sale of the Tire Recycling Business to the Purchaser
or approve, adopt, or recommend an acquisition
proposal.
|
Under the terms of the Asset Purchase
Agreement, we have agreed to pay LTS’ documented legal fees and other
out-of-pocket costs incurred in connection with the proposed sale of the Tire
Recycling Business, up to a maximum of $150,000, if we do not receive the
approval of the holders of at least 50.1% of our outstanding common stock of the
sale of the Tire Recycling Business and as a result terminate the Asset Purchase
Agreement.
We and the LTS Group are each
responsible for our respective costs and expenses that we or the LTS Group incur
in connection with the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling Business. We and the
LTS Group have further agreed that we and the LTS Group will each pay one-half
of the fees and expenses of the escrow agent responsible for administering the
escrow fund established in connection with our indemnification obligations under
the Asset Purchase Agreement.
Indemnification
Under the Asset Purchase Agreement, we
have agreed to indemnify LTS and the Purchaser, and their representatives and
other related parties against any losses, liabilities, damages or expenses,
including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses, which arise from or in
connection with: (a) any breach or inaccuracy of any representation or
warranty made by us in the Asset Purchase Agreement or in any exhibits or
schedules thereto or in any certificate or document delivered by us at the
Closing; (b) any breach or nonperformance of any covenant or obligation
made by us in the Asset Purchase Agreement or any other agreement contemplated
by the Asset Purchase Agreement; (c) any liabilities of the Tire Recycling
Business retained by us; or (d) any obligation under the Warn Act or similar
state legal requirement caused by our actions prior to Closing; provided that
our liability for such indemnification claims for breaches of representations
and warranties shall not exceed an amount equal to 5% of the purchase price, and
provided further that we shall not be required to indemnify LTS and the
Purchaser for breaches of representations and warranties unless and until the
total claims for such indemnification, in the aggregate, equal or exceed $50,000
and only in the amount in excess of $50,000.
Pursuant to the Asset Purchase
Agreement, the Purchaser will withhold $500,000 of the Purchase Price for a
period of one year from the Closing to satisfy potential indemnification
obligations owed by us to the LTS Group. One-half of this amount,
minus any amounts subject to claims by the LTS Group, will be released 180 days
after Closing. In addition, we are required to maintain approximately
$1.3 million (minus any amount held by Purchaser as described in the preceding
sentence) in cash or cash equivalents in order to satisfy potential obligations
owed by us to the LTS Group.
LTS and Purchaser have agreed to
indemnify us for any losses, liability, damages or expenses, including
reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses, which arise from or in connection with:
(a) any breach or inaccuracy of any representation or warranty made by the
LTS Group in the Asset Purchase Agreement or in any exhibits or schedules
thereto or in any certificate or document delivered by the LTS Group at the
Closing; (b) any breach or nonperformance of any covenant or obligation
made by the LTS Group in the Asset Purchase Agreement or any other agreement
contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement; (c) any liabilities of the Tire
Recycling Business assumed by the Purchaser; or (d) any obligation under the
Warn Action or similar state legal requirement caused by any action of the
Purchaser on or following the Closing; provided that the liability of the LTS
Group for such indemnification claims for breaches of representations and
warranties shall not exceed an amount equal to 5% of the purchase price, and
provided further that the LTS Group shall not be required to indemnify us for
breaches of representations and warranties unless and until the total claims for
such indemnification, in the aggregate, equal or exceed $50,000 and only in the
amount in excess of $50,000.
The
Voting Agreement
Simultaneously
with the execution and delivery of the Asset Purchase Agreement, the members of
our Board of Directors and all of our executive officers entered into the Voting
Agreement with LTS, Purchaser and us (the “Voting Agreement”). As of September
12, 2008, the shares covered by the Voting Agreement represented in the
aggregate approximately 25% of our outstanding common stock. Pursuant to the
Voting Agreement, our directors and executive officers have agreed to vote in
favor of the Asset Purchase Agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby.
The above
description summarizes select provisions of the Voting Agreement and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the Voting
Agreement attached as Appendix E
to this proxy statement. We urge you to read carefully the entire Voting
Agreement.
Related Party
Transactions
Tire
Recycling Business Related Party Transactions
We
rent several pieces of equipment on a monthly basis from Valley View Farms, Inc.
and Maust Asset Management, LLC, two companies co-owned by Mark Maust, President
of GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota, Inc. and GreenMan Technologies of Iowa,
Inc. In addition, we have entered into several capital lease
agreements with Maust Asset Management, LLC which had an outstanding balance of
approximately $640,000 at September 30, 2008. Purchaser will assume all
remaining obligations under these capital lease agreements as part of the
pending transaction, such amounts will be deducted from the net proceeds of the
transaction received by us.
In
April 2003, GreenMan Technologies of Iowa, Inc. entered into a ten-year lease
with Maust Asset Management, LLC for a facility located on approximately 4 acres
of land in Des Moines, Iowa. In April 2005, GreenMan Technologies of
Iowa, Inc. entered into an eight-year lease with Maust Asset Management, LLC for
approximately 3 acres adjacent to the existing Iowa facility. The
aggregate current monthly rent payment under both leases is $11,750 plus real
estate taxes. These lease arrangements will terminate at the close of the sale
of the Tire Recycling Business and we expect that the Purchaser will enter into
a new lease arrangement with Maust Asset Management, LLC.
GreenMan
Technologies of Minnesota, Inc. leases property located in Savage, Minnesota
from Two Oaks, LLC, an entity co-owned by Mark Maust under a 12-year lease
agreement. This lease will terminate at the close of the sale of the Tire
Recycling Business and we expect that the Purchaser will enter into a new lease
arrangement with Two Oaks, LLC.
Other
Related Party Transactions
Between June and August 2003, two
immediate family members of Maurice Needham, our Chairman of the Board of
Directors, loaned us a total of $400,000 under the terms of two-year, unsecured
promissory notes which bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum. The two
individuals agreed to extend the maturity date of these notes until the earlier
of when all amounts due under the Laurus credit facility have been repaid or
June 30, 2009. The current balance due under these notes is
$400,000.
In September 2003, Bob Davis, a former
officer of GreenMan, loaned us $400,000 under the terms of an unsecured
promissory note which bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum. In July 2006,
Mr. Davis assigned the remaining balance due under the note, $99,320, as
follows: $79,060 to one of the noteholders described in the preceding paragraph
and the remaining balance of $20,260 plus accrued interest of $13,500 to Mr.
Needham. All parties agreed to extend the maturity of the remaining
balance of this note until the earlier of when all amounts due under the Laurus
credit facility have been repaid or June 30, 2009. The current
balance due under these notes is $99,320.
Between January and June 2006, Nicholas
DeBenedictis, a director, loaned us $155,000 under three unsecured promissory
notes which bear interest at the rate of 10% per annum with interest and
principal due during the period from June 30, 2006 through September 30,
2006. During the year ended of September 30, 2007 Mr. DeBenedictis
agreed to extend the remaining balance due under the notes of $35,000 until the
earlier of when all amounts due under the restructured Laurus credit facility
have been repaid or June 30, 2009.
We intend to use approximately $665,000
of the net proceeds of the sale of the Tire Recycling Business to repay all
principal and accrued interest due these individuals (approximately $535,000 and
$130,000, respectively, at September 30, 2008).
Certain Material Federal and State
Income Tax Consequences
This
is a summary of the principal material United States federal and state income
tax consequences relating to the proposed sale of assets.
The proposed sale of assets will be a
transaction taxable to us for United States federal and state income tax purposes.
We will recognize taxable income equal to the amount realized on the sale in
excess of our tax basis in the assets sold. The amount realized on the sale will
consist of the cash we receive in exchange for the assets sold, plus the amount
of related liabilities assumed by the Purchaser. Although the sale of the assets
will result in a taxable gain to us, substantially all of the taxable gain on a
federal tax basis will be offset against our current year losses from operations
plus available net operating loss carry forwards, as currently reflected on our
consolidated federal income tax returns. We do not have substantial
state net operating loss carry forwards and anticipate that a majority of our
tax obligations resulting from the contemplated transaction will be on a state
income tax level.
The
proposed sale of the assets will not be a taxable event for our stockholders
under applicable United
States federal income tax
laws.
This
summary does not consider the effect of any applicable foreign, state, local or
other tax laws nor does it address tax consequences applicable to stockholders
that may be subject to special federal income tax rules. This summary is based
on the current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, existing, temporary, and
proposed Treasury regulations thereunder, and current administrative rulings and
court decisions. Future legislative, judicial or administrative actions or
decisions, which may be retroactive in effect, may affect the accuracy of any
statements in this summary with respect to the transactions entered into or
contemplated prior to the effective date of those changes.
Accounting Treatment
We will record the sale of the Tire
Recycling Business in accordance with generally accepted principles in the
United States. Upon completion of the disposition, we
will recognize a gain for financial reporting purposes equal to the net proceeds
(the sum of purchase price less expenses of the sale) less the book value of the
assets and liabilities sold.
Regulatory Approvals
We are not aware of any federal or state
regulatory requirements that must be complied with or approvals that must be
obtained to complete the sale of the Tire Recycling Business, other than the
filing of this proxy statement with the SEC. If any additional approvals or
filings are required, we will use our commercially reasonable efforts to obtain
those approvals and make any required filings before completing the
transactions.
No Changes to the Rights of
Shareholders
There will be no change in the rights of
our shareholders as a result of the sale of the Tire Recycling
Business.
No Appraisal Rights
Our shareholders do not have appraisal
rights under the Delaware General Corporation Law in connection with the sale of
the Tire Recycling Business.
The affirmative vote of holders of a
majority of the shares of common stock is required in order to approve the sale
of the Tire Recycling Business. Because the affirmative vote of a majority of
the votes entitled to be cast at the Special Meeting is required to approve the
sale of the Tire Recycling Business, abstentions, broker “non-votes” and shares
not represented at the Special Meeting will have the same effect as a vote
“AGAINST” the sale.
Recommendation of Our Board of Directors
Regarding the Sale of the Tire Recycling
Business
For the reasons described above, our
Board of Directors has determined that the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling
Business pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement is in the best interests of
the Company and our shareholders. Accordingly, our Board of Directors has
unanimously approved the proposed sale of the Tire Recycling Business and
recommends to our shareholders that they vote “FOR” approval of
Proposal No. 1.
Our Board of Directors unanimously
recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of the proposed sale of the Tire
Recycling Business pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement by completing and
returning the enclosed proxy or by completing and returning the voting
instructions that you receive from the broker or other nominee that holds your
shares.
PROPOSAL 2:
ADJOURNMENT
Purpose
In the event there are not sufficient
votes present, in person or by proxy, at the Special Meeting to approve the sale
of the Tire Recycling Business, our chief executive officer or other officer,
acting in his capacity as chairperson of the meeting, may propose an adjournment
of the Special Meeting to a later date or dates to permit further solicitation
of proxies.
Required Shareholder Vote to Approve the
Adjournment Proposal
Approval of the adjournment proposal
will require that the number of votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the
number of votes cast against it. Assuming the presence of a quorum, abstentions,
broker “non-votes” and shares not represented at the Special Meeting will have
no effect on the adjournment proposal.
Recommendation of our Board of
Directors
Our Board of Directors unanimously
recommends that our shareholders vote “FOR” approval of Proposal No. 2
to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary to obtain the requisite number of
proxies to approve Proposal No. 1.
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., AND
SUBSIDIARIES
General Information
The following unaudited pro forma
consolidated financial information sets forth the pro forma consolidated results
of operations of GreenMan Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the nine months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and the twelve months ended September 30, 2007 and
2006, and the pro forma consolidated financial position of the Company as of
June 30, 2008.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated
results of operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and
the twelve months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 have been derived from the
Company’s historical consolidated financial information and give effect to the
following transaction as if it had occurred on October 1, 2005 (the
earliest period presented). In addition, the unaudited pro forma consolidated
balance sheet as of June 30, 2008 has been derived from the Company’s historical
consolidated financial information and gives effect to the following transaction
as if it had occurred on October 1, 2007:
|
·
|
Transaction — The proposed sale of
substantially all of the net assets of the Company’s Tire Recycling
Business to Liberty Tire Services of Ohio, LLC, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Liberty Tire Services, LLC (collectively, “Liberty”) in exchange for approximately $26
million in cash. At closing, we estimate $12.8 million will be used to
pay-off our Laurus credit facility, $3.7 million will be used to retire
certain transaction related obligations, $1.5 million will be due in
federal and state income taxes, $1.3 million (5% of gross proceeds)
of the cash proceeds will be placed in a restricted account to cover
possible indemnification claims, $.95 million will be used to pay
down a portion of other debt including approximately $.85 million of
related party debt and other transaction related fees to legal and
accounting services.
|
The unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial information has been prepared in accordance with Article 11 of
Regulation S-X and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s
historical audited consolidated financial statements and unaudited interim
consolidated financial statements included in this Proxy Statement as
Appendix C and Appendix D, respectively.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial information does not purport to represent what the Company’s
consolidated results of operations or consolidated financial position would have
been if this transaction had occurred on the date indicated and are not intended
to project the Company’s consolidated results of operations or consolidated
financial position for any future period or date.
The unaudited pro forma adjustments are
based on estimates and certain assumptions that the Company believes are
reasonable. The unaudited consolidated pro forma adjustments and primary
assumptions are described in the accompanying notes herein.
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
Pro Forma Consolidated Balance
Sheet
As of June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
|
|
GreenMan
Historical
Consolidated
|
|
|
Tire
Recycling
Businesses
|
|
|
Pro
Forma
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
Pro
Forma
Consolidated
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
543,057 |
|
|
$ |
461,820 |
|
|
$ |
26,000,000 |
|
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
6,325,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,300,000 |
) |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,917,960 |
) |
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
461,820 |
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,300,000 |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1,300,000 |
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
|
3,658,640 |
|
|
|
2,893,316 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
765,324 |
|
Product
inventory
|
|
|
1,992,927 |
|
|
|
927,010 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
1,065,917 |
|
Other
current assets
|
|
|
1,305,754 |
|
|
|
856,180 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
449,574 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
7,500,378 |
|
|
|
5,138,326 |
|
|
|
7,543,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
9,905,912 |
|
Property,
plant and equipment
|
|
|
6,623,658 |
|
|
|
6,050,985 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
572,673 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
3,799,838 |
|
|
|
169,088 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
3,630,750 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
17,923,874 |
|
|
$ |
11,358,399 |
|
|
$ |
7,543,860 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,109,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
payable, current
|
|
$ |
10,275,467 |
|
|
$ |
381,353 |
|
|
$ |
489,176 |
|
(4),(6 |
) |
|
$ |
383,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,800,000 |
) |
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200,000 |
) |
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Notes
payable, line of credit
|
|
|
2,999,662 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(2,999,662 |
) |
(5 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
Obligations
under capital leases, current
|
|
|
337,555 |
|
|
|
337,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
2,612,077 |
|
|
|
1,693,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
918,387 |
|
Income
taxes payable
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
2,598,182 |
|
|
|
895,720 |
|
|
|
(112,720 |
) |
(7 |
) |
|
|
1,589,742 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
18,822,943 |
|
|
|
3,308,318 |
|
|
|
(11,123,206 |
) |
|
|
|
|
4,391,419 |
|
Notes
payable, non-current
|
|
|
2,088,087 |
|
|
|
1,422,559 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
665,529 |
|
Notes
payable, related party, non-current
|
|
|
534,320 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(534,320 |
) |
(7 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
Obligations
under capital leases, non-current
|
|
|
1,529,791 |
|
|
|
1,529,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
Other
liabilities, non-current
|
|
|
823,434 |
|
|
|
242,894 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
580,540 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
23,798,575 |
|
|
|
6,503,562 |
|
|
|
(11,657,526 |
) |
|
|
|
|
5,637,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
Common
stock
|
|
|
308,804 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
308,804 |
|
Additional
paid in capital
|
|
|
38,829,920 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
38,829,920 |
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(45,013,425 |
) |
|
|
4,854,837 |
|
|
|
(489,176 |
) |
(4 |
) |
|
|
(30,666,876 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
(8 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(1,500,000 |
) |
(9 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
21,290,562 |
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
Total
stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(5,874,701 |
) |
|
|
8,926,907 |
|
|
|
19,201,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,471,848 |
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
|
$ |
17,923,874 |
|
|
$ |
15,430,469 |
|
|
$ |
7,543,860 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,109,335 |
|
See the accompanying notes to the
unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information.
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of
Operations
Nine Months Ended June 30,
2008
(Unaudited)
|
|
GreenMan
Historical
Consolidated
|
|
|
Tire
Recycling
Businesses
|
|
|
Pro
Forma
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro
Forma
Consolidated
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
17,710,424 |
|
|
$ |
15,616,828 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
2,093,596 |
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
12,410,169 |
|
|
|
10,939,317 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,470,852 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
5,300,255 |
|
|
|
4,677,511 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
622,744 |
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
3,996,505 |
|
|
|
1,693,993 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,302,512 |
|
Operating
income from continuing operations
|
|
|
1,303,750 |
|
|
|
2,983,518 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(1,679,768 |
) |
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
and financing costs
|
|
|
(1,489,457 |
) |
|
|
(406,942 |
)(1) |
|
|
984,299 |
|
|
|
(98,216 |
) |
Other,
net
|
|
|
7,878 |
|
|
|
(18,103 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
25,981 |
|
Other
expense, net
|
|
|
(1,481,579 |
) |
|
|
(425,045 |
) |
|
|
984,299 |
|
|
|
(72,235 |
) |
Income
(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(177,829 |
) |
|
|
2,558,473 |
|
|
|
984,299 |
|
|
|
(1,752,003 |
) |
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
52,438 |
|
|
|
52,438 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(230,267 |
) |
|
|
2,506,035 |
|
|
|
984,299 |
|
|
|
(1,752,003 |
) |
Discontinued
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from discontinued operations
|
|
|
2,360,930 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,360,930 |
|
|
|
|
2,360,930 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,360,930 |
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
2,130,663 |
|
|
$ |
2,506,035 |
|
|
$ |
984,299 |
|
|
$ |
608,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations per share –basic
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
Income
from discontinued operations per share –basic
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
Net
Income (loss) per share –basic
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
Net
Income (loss) per share –diluted
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding -basic
|
|
|
30,880,435 |
|
|
|
30,880,435 |
|
|
|
30,880,435 |
|
|
|
30,880,435 |
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding -diluted
|
|
|
35,558,341 |
|
|
|
35,558,341 |
|
|
|
35,558,341 |
|
|
|
35,558,341 |
|
See the accompanying notes to the
unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of
Operations
Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
2007
(Unaudited)
|
|
GreenMan
Historical
Consolidated
|
|
|
Tire
Recycling
Businesses
|
|
|
Pro
Forma
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro
Forma
Consolidated
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
20,178,726 |
|
|
$ |
20,178,726 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
14,222,158 |
|
|
|
14,222,158 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
5,956,568 |
|
|
|
5,956,568 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
3,841,029 |
|
|
|
2,262,925 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,578,104 |
|
Operating
income from continuing operations
|
|
|
2,115,539 |
|
|
|
3,693,643 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(1,578,104 |
) |
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
and financing costs
|
|
|
(2,006,299 |
) |
|
|
(467,526 |
) |
|
|
(1)
1,538,773 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Other,
net
|
|
|
3,257 |
|
|
|
37,284 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(34,027 |
) |
Other
expense, net
|
|
|
(2,003,042 |
) |
|
|
(430,242 |
) |
|
|
1,538,773 |
|
|
|
(34,027 |
) |
Income
(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
112,497 |
|
|
|
3,263,401 |
|
|
|
1,538,773 |
|
|
|
(1,612,131 |
) |
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
115,799 |
|
|
|
95,735 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
20,064 |
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(3,302 |
) |
|
|
3,167,666 |
|
|
|
1,538,773 |
|
|
|
(1,632,195 |
) |
Discontinued
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from discontinued operations
|
|
|
297,196 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
297,196 |
|
|
|
|
297,196 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
297,196 |
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
293,894 |
|
|
$ |
3,167,666 |
|
|
$ |
1,538,773 |
|
|
$ |
(1,334,999 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations per share –basic
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
Income
from discontinued operations per share –basic
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
Net
Income (loss) per share –basic
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
Net
Income (loss) per share –diluted
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding -basic
|
|
|
21,766,013 |
|
|
|
21,766,013 |
|
|
|
21,766,013 |
|
|
|
21,766,013 |
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding -diluted
|
|
|
26,456,510 |
|
|
|
26,456,510 |
|
|
|
26,456,510 |
|
|
|
26,456,510 |
|
See the accompanying notes to the
unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information.
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma
Consolidated Financial Information
I.
|
Adjustments to unaudited pro forma
consolidated balance sheet
|
(a)
|
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
|
Represents the historical unaudited
consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2008 as reported in the Company’s
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008.
(b)
|
Tire Recycling
Business
|
Represents the elimination of the Tire
Recycling Business’ assets and liabilities, as reflected in the historical
consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of June 30,
2008.
The Tire Recycling Business’ historical
financial position is included within the Company’s Consolidated Financial
statements for financial reporting purposes. In addition the Laurus
credit facility (revolving debt and secured term debt) have been transacted
through the corporate accounts of the Company and therefore have not
historically been reflected in the Tire Recycling Business
(c)
|
Pro Forma
Adjustments
|
1) At the close of the transaction,
the Company will receive proceeds of $26 million of which $1.3 million will
be placed in a separate account to cover possible indemnification claims that
may arise from this transaction.
2) Represents the pay down of all
amounts due by the Company to Laurus, certain Tire Recycling Business debt other
Company indebtedness and transaction costs, as further described
below.
3) The Company will retain the Tire
Recycling Business’ cash balances at closing.
4) This amount reflects the write
off of $489,176 of deferred financing costs as a result of the repayment of all
amounts due Laurus.
5) Approximately $12.8 million
of the cash proceeds will be used to pay off all amounts due Laurus by the
Company at closing including the portion which was allocated to the Tire
Recycling Business based on the percentage of total Tire Recycling Business
assets to total assets.
6) Approximately $3.7 million of
the cash proceeds will be used to extinguish certain Tire Recycling Business
notes payable and capital leases at closing.
7) Approximately $.85 million
of the cash proceeds will be used to pay certain notes payable and accrued
interest due related parties and others at closing.
8) Approximately $.1 million
of the cash proceeds will be used to pay transaction costs associated with legal
and accounting services.
9) Estimated state and federal
income tax expense associated with sale of the Tire Recycling
Business.
10) Estimated gain on sale of the
Tire Recycling Business before state and federal income
taxes.
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma
Consolidated Financial Information
II.
|
Adjustments to unaudited pro forma
consolidated statements of
operations
|
a)
|
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
|
Represents the historical unaudited
consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007 and the audited consolidated statement of operations for the
fiscal years ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 as reported in the Company’s
Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended September 30,
2007.
b)
|
Tire Recycling
Business
|
Represents
the elimination of Tire Recycling Business’ revenues and expenses as reflected
in the historical consolidated statement of operations of the Company for the
nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006.
1) Represents adjustment to reflect
interest and loan amortization expense after the payment of approximately
$12.8 million of the Company’s senior debt due Laurus, approximately
$3.7 million of a Tire Recycling Business notes payable and capitalized
leases and approximately $.85 million of related party and other notes payable
for the periods presented as if the pending transaction had occurred on October
1, 2005.
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
The Company has prepared the following
unaudited financial statements to present the balance sheets and statements of
operations of the Tire Recycling Business on a stand-alone basis for the same
periods as presented for the Company as a whole set forth in Appendix C and Appendix D, respectively. The unaudited financial
statements represent the results of operations and financial position of the
Tire Recycling Business as a stand-alone business, which include certain cost
allocations.
The following unaudited financial
statements of the Tire Recycling Business are presented
herein:
|
·
|
Unaudited balance sheets — as
of June 30, 2008, September 30, 2007 and September 30,
2006.
|
|
·
|
Unaudited statements of
operations — for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and June
30, 2007 and for the years ended September 30, 2007 and
2006.
|
|
·
|
Notes to unaudited financial
statements
|
The unaudited financial statements of
the Tire Recycling Business, including the notes thereto, are qualified in their
entirety by reference to, and should be read in conjunction with, the audited
Company’s historical financial statements and notes thereto attached hereto as
Appendix C and the Company’s unaudited historical
financial statements and notes thereto attached hereto as Appendix D.
The unaudited financial statements of
the Tire Recycling Business included herein are derived from the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
Tire Recycling
Business
Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
June 30,
2008
|
|
|
September 30,
2007
|
|
|
September 30,
2006
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
461,820 |
|
|
$ |
322,069 |
|
|
$ |
636,193 |
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
|
2,893,316 |
|
|
|
2,462,358 |
|
|
|
2,056,928 |
|
Product
inventory
|
|
|
927,010 |
|
|
|
157,094 |
|
|
|
113,336 |
|
Other
current assets
|
|
|
856,180 |
|
|
|
657,746 |
|
|
|
610,807 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
5,138,326 |
|
|
|
3,599,267 |
|
|
|
3,417,264 |
|
Property,
plant and equipment
|
|
|
6,050,985 |
|
|
|
5,218,706 |
|
|
|
5,805,246 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
169,088 |
|
|
|
216,987 |
|
|
|
173,006 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
11,358,399 |
|
|
$ |
9,034,960 |
|
|
$ |
9,395,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
payable, current
|
|
$ |
381,353 |
|
|
$ |
339,189 |
|
|
$ |
334,293 |
|
Obligations
under capital leases, current
|
|
|
337,555 |
|
|
|
185,127 |
|
|
|
185,940 |
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
1,693,690 |
|
|
|
1,203,522 |
|
|
|
1,363,636 |
|
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
895,720 |
|
|
|
1,045,075 |
|
|
|
626,635 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
3,308,318 |
|
|
|
2,772,913 |
|
|
|
2,510,504 |
|
Notes
payable, non-current
|
|
|
1,422,559 |
|
|
|
1,132,456 |
|
|
|
1,615,692 |
|
Obligations
under capital leases, non-current
|
|
|
1,529,791 |
|
|
|
1,272,527 |
|
|
|
910,456 |
|
Other
liabilities, non-current
|
|
|
242,894 |
|
|
|
270,298 |
|
|
|
343,188 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
6,503,562 |
|
|
|
5,448,194 |
|
|
|
5,379,840 |
|
Common
stock
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Additional
paid in capital
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Accumulated
earnings
|
|
|
4,854,837 |
|
|
|
3,586,766 |
|
|
|
4,015,676 |
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
4,854,837 |
|
|
|
3,586,766 |
|
|
|
4,015,676 |
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$ |
11,358,399 |
|
|
$ |
9,034,960 |
|
|
$ |
9,395,516 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these financial statements.
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
Tire Recycling
Business
Statements of
Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
Nine
Months
Ended
June 30,
2008
|
|
|
Nine
Months
Ended
June 30,
2007
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
15,616,828 |
|
|
$ |
13,671,561 |
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
10,939,317 |
|
|
|
9,670,433 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
4,677,511 |
|
|
|
4,001,128 |
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
1,693,993 |
|
|
|
1,649,057 |
|
Operating
income from continuing operations
|
|
|
2,983,518 |
|
|
|
2,352,071 |
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
and financing costs
|
|
|
(406,942 |
) |
|
|
(441,522 |
) |
Other,
net
|
|
|
(18,103 |
) |
|
|
21,014 |
|
Other
expense, net
|
|
|
(425,045 |
) |
|
|
(420,508 |
) |
Income
from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
2,558,473 |
|
|
|
1,931,563 |
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
52,438 |
|
|
|
30,613 |
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
2,506,035 |
|
|
$ |
1,990,950 |
|
|
|
Year
Ended
September 30,
2007
|
|
|
Year
Ended
September 30,
2006
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
20,178,726 |
|
|
$ |
17,607,812 |
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
14,222,158 |
|
|
|
12,953,753 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
5,956,568 |
|
|
|
4,654,059 |
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
2,262,925 |
|
|
|
1,826,781 |
|
Operating
income from continuing operations
|
|
|
3,693,643 |
|
|
|
2,827,278 |
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
and financing costs
|
|
|
(467,526 |
) |
|
|
(612,213 |
) |
Other,
net
|
|
|
37,284 |
|
|
|
(11,559 |
) |
Other
expense, net
|
|
|
(430,242 |
) |
|
|
(623,772 |
) |
Income
from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
3,263,401 |
|
|
|
2,203,506 |
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
95,735 |
|
|
|
61,815 |
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
3,167,666 |
|
|
$ |
2,141,691 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these financial statements.
TIRE RECYCLING
BUSINESS
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
2008 and 2007
THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 and
2006
The Tire Recycling Business historical
financial position and financial results are reported as part of GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. consolidated results.
1. Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
Business
The tire recycling operations located in
Savage, Minnesota and Des Moines, Iowa collect, process and market scrap tires
in whole, shredded or granular form. We are paid a fee to collect, transport and
process scrap tires (i.e., collection/processing revenue) in
whole or into two inch or smaller rubber chips which are then sold (i.e., product revenue).
Basis of
Presentation
The financial statements contained
herein follow the principles and policies more fully described in the Company’s
audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2007
and 2006 attached hereto as Appendix C, and the Company’s unaudited
consolidated financial statements for the three and nine month periods ended
June 30, 2008 attached hereto as Appendix D, which have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The unaudited financial statements are derived from the Company’s historical
consolidated financial statements and are designed to present the Tire Recycling
Business as if it was not part of the consolidated operations of the Company for
the periods presented. Management believes that the unaudited financial
statements presented herein have been prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles and meet Regulation S-X
requirements.
Management
Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the amounts of revenues and expenses recorded during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates. Such estimates relate
primarily to the estimated lives of property and equipment other intangible
assets, the valuation reserve on deferred taxes, the value of our lease
settlement obligation and the value of equity instruments issued. The
amount that may be ultimately realized from assets and liabilities could differ
materially from the values recorded in the accompanying financial statements for
the periods presented.
In
particular, discontinued operations included management’s best estimate of the
amounts to be realized and liabilities to be incurred in connection with the
discontinuing of our Georgia operation. The amounts we may ultimately
realize could differ materially from the amounts estimated in arriving at the
loss on disposal of the discontinued operations.
Cash
Equivalents
Cash
equivalents include short-term investments with original maturities of three
months or less.
Accounts receivable are carried at
original invoice amount less an estimate made for doubtful accounts. Management
determines the allowance for doubtful accounts by regularly evaluating past due
individual customer receivables and considering a customer’s financial condition,
credit history, and the current economic conditions. Individual
accounts receivable are written off when deemed uncollectible, with any future
recoveries recorded as income when received.
Product
Inventory
Inventory
consists primarily of crumb rubber and is valued at the lower of cost or market
on the first-in first-out (FIFO) method.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property,
plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization expense is
provided on the straight-line method. Expenditures for maintenance,
repairs and minor renewals are charged to expense as incurred. Significant
improvements and major renewals that extend the useful life of equipment are
capitalized.
Revenue
Recognition
We
have two sources of revenue: processing revenue which is earned from the
collection, transportation and processing of scrap tires and product revenue
which is earned from the sale of tire chips, crumb rubber and
steel. Revenues from product sales are recognized when the products
are shipped and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenues
derived from the collection, transporting and processing of tires are recognized
when processing of the tires has been completed.
Income
Taxes
Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are recorded for temporary differences between the
financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using the currently
enacted income tax rates expected to be in effect when the taxes are actually
paid or recovered. A deferred tax asset is also recorded for net operating loss
and tax credit carry forwards to the extent their realization is more likely
than not. The deferred tax expense for the period represents the change in the
net deferred tax asset or liability from the beginning to the end of the
period.
Intangible
Assets
In
accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” we review
intangibles for impairment annually, or more frequently if an event occurs or
circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of
our intangible assets below their carrying value.
Intangible
assets include customer relationships acquired in current or past business
acquisitions which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of
ten to twenty years, commencing on the date of the acquisition. The
impairment test for customer relationships requires us to review original
relations for continued retention.
Long-Lived
Assets
In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144,
long-lived assets to be held and used are analyzed for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. SFAS No. 144 “Accounting for The Impairment or
Disposal of Long Lived Assets”, relates to assets that can be amortized and the
life can be determinable. We evaluate at each balance sheet date whether events
and circumstances have occurred that indicate possible impairment. If
there are indications of impairment, we use future undiscounted cash flows of
the related asset or asset grouping over the remaining life in measuring whether
the assets are fully recoverable. In the event such cash flows are
not expected to be sufficient to recover the recorded asset values, the assets
are written down to their estimated fair value. Long-lived assets to
be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value of
asset less the cost to sell.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
SFAS
No. 155
– In February 2006, FASB
issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for
Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments” as an amendment to SFAS No. 133 and
140. This Statement:
a. Permits fair value re-measurement for
any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that
otherwise would require bifurcation;
b. Clarifies which interest-only strips
and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of Statement
133;
c. Establishes a requirement to evaluate
interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are
freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain
an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation;
d. Clarifies that concentrations of
credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives;
and
e. Amends Statement 140 to eliminate the
prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative
financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another
derivative financial instrument.
This Statement is effective for all
financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s
first fiscal year that
begins after September 15, 2006. The adoption of SFAS 155 has not had a
material effect on our consolidated or Tire Recycling Business financial
position or results of operations.
SFAS
No. 157
– In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value
Measurement" ("SFAS 157").
SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 17, 2007
and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are evaluating the impact of
adopting SFAS 157 on our consolidated financial position, results of operations
and cash flows.
FIN
No. 48 –
In July 2006, the FASB
issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for
Uncertain Tax Positions”;
an Interpretation of SFAS No. 109 (“FIN 48”), which clarifies the criteria
for recognition and measurement of benefits from uncertain tax positions. Under
FIN 48, an entity should recognize a tax benefit when it is
“more-likely-than-not”, based on the technical merits, that the position would
be sustained upon examination by a taxing authority. The amount to be
recognized, given the “more likely than not” threshold was passed, should be
measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent
likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority that
has full knowledge of all relevant information. Furthermore, any change in the
recognition, derecognition or measurement of a tax position should be recognized
in the interim period in which the change occurs. The adoption of FIN
48 has not had a material effect on our consolidated or Tire Recycling Business
financial position or results of operations.
2. Property, Plant and
Equipment
Property,
plant and equipment consists of the following:
|
|
June
30,
2008
|
|
|
September
30,
2007
|
|
Estimated
Useful
Lives
|
Buildings
and improvements
|
|
$ |
1,710,073 |
|
|
$ |
1,384,028 |
|
10
- 20 years
|
Machinery
and equipment
|
|
|
7,803,610 |
|
|
|
7,379,405 |
|
5
- 10 years
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
|
|
15,793 |
|
|
|
15,147 |
|
3
- 5 years
|
Motor
vehicles
|
|
|
4,604,682 |
|
|
|
3,928,089 |
|
3
- 10 years
|
|
|
|
14,134,158 |
|
|
|
12,706,669 |
|
|
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(8,083,173 |
) |
|
|
(7,487,963 |
) |
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
|
$ |
6,050,985 |
|
|
$ |
5,218,706 |
|
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain
information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of September
30, 2008 including options and warrants exercisable within sixty days thereof,
with respect to (i) each person (including any “group” as used in Section
13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) known to us to be the beneficial
owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock; (ii) each director;
(iii) each executive officer who was identified in our proxy statement
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 20, 2008 and
(iv) all of our directors and executive officers as a
group.
Unless otherwise indicated below, to the
best of our knowledge, all persons listed below have sole voting and investment
power with respect to their shares of common stock, except to the extent
authority is shared by spouses under applicable law. As of September 30, 2008,
30,880,435 shares of our common stock were issued and
outstanding.
Security Ownership of Management and
Directors
Name (1)
|
|
Number of
Shares
Beneficially Owned
(2)
|
|
Percentage
of Class
(2)
|
Dr.
Allen Kahn (3)
|
|
4,371,931 |
|
14.15 |
% |
Maurice
E. Needham (4)
|
|
1,672,301 |
|
5.36 |
% |
Lyle
Jensen (5)
|
|
1,013,522 |
|
3.24 |
% |
Charles
E. Coppa (6)
|
|
688,228 |
|
2.21 |
% |
Nicholas
DeBenedictis (7)
|
|
815,454 |
|
2.64 |
% |
Lew
F. Boyd (8)
|
|
293,678 |
|
.95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
officers and directors
as
a group (6 persons)
|
|
8,855,114 |
|
27.68 |
% |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners
Name (1)
|
|
Number of
Shares
Beneficially Owned
(2)
|
|
Percentage
of Class
(2)
|
Laurus
Master Fund, Ltd. (9)
|
|
1,540,934 |
|
|
4.99 |
% |
___________________________
(1)
|
Except as noted, each person’s
address is care of GreenMan Technologies, Inc., 12498 Wyoming Avenue
South, Savage, Minnesota 55378.
|
(2)
|
Pursuant to the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, shares of common stock that an
individual or group has a right to acquire within 60 days pursuant to the
exercise of options or warrants are deemed to be outstanding for the
purpose of computing the percentage ownership of such individual or group,
but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the
percentage ownership of any other person shown in the
table.
|
(3)
|
Includes 23,500 shares of common
stock issuable pursuant to immediately exercisable stock
options.
|
(4)
|
Includes 343,962 shares of common
stock issuable pursuant to immediately exercisable stock options. Also
includes 59,556 shares of common stock owned by Mr. Needham’s
wife.
|
(5)
|
Includes 378,500 shares of common
stock issuable pursuant to immediately exercisable stock
options.
|
(6)
|
Includes 301,300 shares of common
stock issuable pursuant to immediately exercisable stock
options.
|
(7)
|
Includes 371,000 shares of common
stock owned by Mr. DeBenedictis’s wife and 47,000 shares of common stock
issuable pursuant to immediately exercisable stock
options.
|
(8)
|
Includes 17,500 shares of common
stock issuable pursuant to immediately exercisable stock
options.
|
(9)
|
Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. holds
warrants to purchase up to 6,000,000 shares of common stock that are
exercisable (subject to the following sentence) at an exercise price of
$.01 per share. The warrants are not exercisable, however, to the extent
that (a) the number of shares of our common stock held by Laurus and (b)
the number of shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of the
warrant would result in beneficial ownership by Laurus of more than 4.99%
of our outstanding shares of common stock. Laurus may waive these
provisions, or increase or decrease that percentage, with respect to the
warrant on 61 days’ prior notice to us, or without notice if we are in
default under our credit facility. Unless and until Laurus waives these
provisions, then Laurus beneficially owns 1,540,934 shares of our common
stock issuable pursuant to underlying warrant. Laurus’s address is
335 Madison
Avenue, New York, New York 10017.
|
OTHER MATTERS
Our Board of Directors is not aware of
any other business that may come before the Special Meeting. However, if
additional matters properly come before the Special Meeting, shares represented
by all proxies received by our Board of Directors will be voted with respect
thereto at the discretion and in accordance with the judgment of the proxy
holders.
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS
Proposals of stockholders intended for
inclusion in the proxy statement to be mailed to all stockholders entitled to
vote at our next annual meeting of stockholders must be received at our
principal executive offices not later than November 4, 2008. In order to curtail
controversy as to the date on which a proposal was received by us, it is
suggested that proponents submit their proposals by Certified Mail Return
Receipt Requested.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE
INFORMATION
We file reports, proxy statements and
other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission as required by the
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. To read or obtain copies of our filings with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, you may visit the Securities and
Exchange Commission in person, request the documents in writing at prescribed
rates or view our filings on the Securities and Exchange Commission website
at:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Public Reference Room
100 F Street,
N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
(800) SEC-0330
www.sec.gov
If you would like additional copies of
this proxy statement, or if you have questions about any of the proposals to be
voted on at the Special Meeting, you should contact:
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
Attn: Charles E.
Coppa
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary
(781)
224-2411
You can also find additional information
about us at our website at www.greenman.biz. Information contained on our
website does not constitute part of this document.
REQUEST TO SIGN, DATE AND RETURN
PROXIES
If you do not intend to be present at
the Special Meeting on November 13, 2008, please sign, date and return the
enclosed proxy card at your earliest convenience.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS,
Charles E. Coppa
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary
APPENDIX A
ASSET PURCHASE
AGREEMENT
BY AND AMONG
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.,
GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES OF IOWA, INC.,
GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES OF MINNESOTA, INC.,
LIBERTY
TIRE SERVICES, LLC, AND
LIBERTY
TIRE SERVICES OF OHIO, LLC
DATED SEPTEMBER 12,
2008
Execution
Version
GreenMan
Technologies of Iowa, Inc.
GreenMan
Technologies of Minnesota, Inc.
Asset
Purchase Agreement
This
Asset Purchase Agreement (this “Agreement”), dated as of
September 12, 2008, is by and among Liberty Tire Services, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (“LTS”); Liberty Tire Services
of Ohio, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary
of LTS (“Purchaser”);
GreenMan Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“GTI”); GreenMan Technologies
of Iowa, Inc., an Iowa corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of GTI (“GTIA”); and GreenMan
Technologies of Minnesota, Inc., a
Minnesota corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of GTI (“GTMN” and, together with GTIA,
“Sellers”).
Sellers
operate their businesses of tire collection, disposal, shredding, processing,
recycling and sale of used tires, including without limitation the production of
tire derived fuel chips, tire derived mulch, tire shreds, crumb rubber and other
tire derived feedstock, located primarily in Iowa and Minnesota, although they
also conduct business in Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri,
Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wisconsin (collectively, the “Business”), utilizing
(i) GTIA’s leased facility located at 1914 E. Euclid Avenue, Des Moines,
Iowa (such real property together with all improvements and equipment located
thereon, the “Des Moines
Facility”); and (ii) GTMN’s leased facility located at 12498 Wyoming
Avenue, Savage, Minnesota (such real property together with all improvements and
equipment located thereon, the “Savage
Facility”).
The
foregoing named plants and facilities are referred to herein collectively as,
the “Business
Facilities.” Further, as used in this Agreement, the “LTS Group Members” means LTS
and Purchaser, and the “GTI
Group Members” means GTI, GTIA and GTMN. Certain additional
terms used in this Agreement are separately defined in the Addendum attached
hereto and are integral to this Agreement.
Sellers
desire to sell and assign to Purchaser substantially all assets related to or
used in connection with the Business, including, without limitation, their
leasehold rights to the Business Facilities, and Purchaser desires to purchase
such assets from Sellers, each in separate transactions below.
The
parties to this Agreement agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
The
Sale and Purchase Transactions
1.1 The
GTIA Transaction. The
transactions set forth in this Section 1.1 are referred to herein
collectively as the “GTIA Transaction.”
(a) Purchase
of GTIA Purchased Assets. Effective at the
Effective Time (as defined in Section 2.1), Purchaser shall purchase from GTIA,
and GTIA shall sell to Purchaser, free and clear of all Indebtedness and Encumbrances, except for
Indebtedness expressly identified on Schedule 1.1(c) and Permitted Encumbrances, all of
GTIA’s right, title and interest in and to all
of its assets, properties,
rights and business as a going concern of every kind, nature and description, wherever located and
whether real, personal or mixed, tangible or intangible, in electronic form or
otherwise, and whether or not having any value for accounting purposes or
carried or reflected on or specifically referred to in its books or financial statements, related to or
used in its operation of the Business (other than the GTIA Retained Assets, as
defined in Section 1.1(b)), including those identified in this Section 1.1(a) below (collectively, the “GTIA Purchased
Assets”):
(i) all
of GTIA’s right, title and interest in the leaseholds, leasehold improvements
and fixtures for all Leased Real Property (as defined in Section 4.14) leased by GTIA as
lessee, which is more particularly described on Schedule 4.14, including the
Des Moines Facility, and including any security deposits for Leased Real
Property leased by GTIA as lessee;
(ii) all
of the parts and supplies inventory, machinery, equipment, shop tools and
equipment, shredders, processing equipment, support equipment, tippers, magnetic
equipment, peripherals, parts, tooling, fork lifts, tractors, trucks,
bulldozers, graders, loaders, unloaders, back hoes, dump trucks, containers,
trailers, cabs, other vehicles (whether titled or untitled), radios, motors,
furniture, office equipment and supplies, fixtures, and other tangible personal
property, owned by GTIA and related to or used in the Business, including those
identified on Schedule 1.1(a)(ii);
(iii) all
inventory of tires, tire shreds, tire chips, crumb rubber and other finished
rubber products located at the Leased Real Property on the Closing
Date;
(iv) all
of GTIA’s computer equipment and related software and licenses related to or
used in the Business, including those identified on Schedule 1.1(a)(iv);
(v) all
other tangible assets located at the Leased Real Property leased by GTIA as
lessee, including the Des Moines Facility;
(vi) all
of GTIA’s books, records, files, manuals, sales and credit reports, customer
lists, customer records, billing information, routing sheets, warranty records
and similar documents and other information related to or used in the operation
of the Business, whether inscribed on tangible medium or stored in electronic or
other medium, and other assets related to or used in the Business;
(vii) all
of GTIA’s rights under all Contracts related to or used in the Business,
including those identified on Schedule 1.1(a)(vii), including, without
limitation, all Contracts related to GTIA’s acquisition of its
businesses;
(viii) all
of GTIA’s rights under all Governmental Authorizations held by it in connection
with the Business, including those Governmental Authorizations identified on
Schedule 1.1(a)(viii);
(ix) all
of GTIA’s claims, choses in action, causes of action and judgments related to
the Business and all warranties in favor of GTIA related to the Business or the
other assets described in this Section 1.1(a);
(x) all
of GTIA’s right, title and interest in all leases for personal property,
including equipment and rolling stock, entered into in connection with the
Business, including those identified on Schedule 1.1(a)(x), and including security
deposits relating thereto;
(xi) all
notes and accounts receivable and other rights to payment due from customers of
GTIA and the full benefit of any security for such accounts or rights to
payment, other than those notes and accounts receivable and other rights to
payment due from the GTI Group Members or their Affiliates;
(xii) all
of GTIA’s pre-paid expenses (including software license fees, annual license
fees for vehicles, and insurance premiums) related to the Business;
(xiii) all
of GTIA’s intangible rights and property, including goodwill and rights in and
to any trade name, trademark, fictitious name or service mark, or any variant of
any of them, and any applications therefor or registrations thereof (other than
rights in the name “GreenMan Technologies of Iowa,” which shall be the subject
of the license described in Section 2.2(c), below), and any other
forms of intellectual property, and all research related to the Business
conducted by GTIA, all rights to GTIA’s telephone numbers, facsimile numbers,
e-mail addresses, Internet sites, Internet addresses and domain names thereof
and other listings;
(xiv) all
of GTIA’s customer relationships, outstanding customer orders and goodwill and
right to own and operate its Business; and
(xv) all
assets not otherwise identified above that are owned or leased and used or
employed by GTIA in connection with the Business.
This
Section 1.1(a) and the Schedules
referred to herein identify all of the GTIA Purchased Assets that will be
conveyed herein by GTIA. If and to the extent that GTI has any
interest in any of the GTIA Purchased Assets, then at the Effective Time (as
defined in Section 2.1), GTI shall be deemed to
have sold, transferred and assigned all such interests to Purchaser for no
additional consideration.
(b) GTIA Retained
Assets. GTIA shall retain and the GTIA Purchased Assets shall
not include all of its other assets, including the following (collectively, the
“GTIA Retained Assets”):
(i) any
of GTIA’s cash and cash equivalents, including bank accounts and mutual fund
accounts;
(ii) any
cash securing any Governmental Authorization held by GTIA;
(iii) any
deposits under closure bonds in the name of
GTIA;
(iv) any
Seller Plans (as defined in Section 4.15) (including any Seller
Plans listed on Schedule 4.15);
(v) any
Tax Returns and Tax records of GTIA and any business records required by law to
be retained by GTIA; provided, that such records
shall be available to Purchaser to the extent reasonably necessary for its Tax
purposes;
(vi) all
of GTIA’s minute and stock book records;
(vii) any
accounts receivable owed to GTIA by any other GTI Group Member or their
Affiliates;
(viii) any
of GTIA’s agreements, Contracts, understandings or business relationships with
GTI or any of its Affiliates (other than the other Seller), except for those
listed and identified as such on Schedule 1.1(a)(vii));
(ix) shares
of stock, equity interests or ownership or debt securities in any other
Person;
(x) all
rights in the name “GreenMan Technologies of Iowa,” subject to the license
described in Section
2.2(c), below;
and
(xi) all
of GTIA’s rights under the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated March 1, 2006, by and
among MTR of Georgia, Inc., GreenMan Technologies of Georgia, Inc., and GreenMan
Technologies, Inc. (the “MTR
Purchase Agreement”).
(c) GTIA Assumed
Liabilities. Effective at the Effective Time, Purchaser shall
assume only (i) the obligations of GTIA existing as of the Effective Time expressly set forth in the
Contracts identified on Schedule 1.1(a)(vii), the Governmental
Authorizations identified on Schedule 1.1(a)(viii), the payment
obligations for GTIA’s trade payables reflected on the Closing Working Capital
Statement (as defined in Section 1.4(d)), and any Indebtedness
expressly identified on Schedule 1.1(c), none of which will be
repaid at Closing, other than (with respect to any of the preceding in this
clause (i)) for Liabilities
arising out of any violation, breach or non-performance of the terms or
obligations thereunder or expenses, costs or payments owing as of the Effective
Time or applicable prior to the Effective Time; and (ii) other short term
accruals of GTIA expressly identified on the Closing Date Certificate Example
(as defined below) to the extent included in Current Liabilities as provided in
Section 1.4(c) (collectively, the
“GTIA Assumed
Liabilities”).
(d) GTIA Retained
Liabilities. Except for the GTIA Assumed Liabilities,
Purchaser does not hereby and shall not assume or in any way undertake to pay,
perform, satisfy or discharge any Liabilities of any kind or nature whatsoever
of GTIA, GTI or GTMN (except as provided in Section 1.2(c)), existing before, on
or after the Effective Time or arising out of any transactions entered into, or
any state of facts existing before, on or after the Effective Time, and whether
or not related to or arising out of any of the GTIA Purchased Assets (the “GTIA Retained
Liabilities”). Without limiting the foregoing, except as set
forth on the Closing Working Capital Statement in the amounts set forth therein,
the term “GTIA Retained Liabilities” shall include:
(i) Liabilities
arising out of or relating to claims for breaches of warranties or products
liability with respect to any product shipped or manufactured by, or any
services provided by, GTIA in whole or in part, prior to the Closing
Date;
(ii) Liabilities
of GTIA to any Related Party;
(iii) Liabilities
the existence of which constitute a breach of the representations, warranties or
covenants of GTIA contained in this Agreement; or for expenses, taxes or fees
incident to or arising out of the negotiation, preparation, approval or
authorization of this Agreement and the consummation of the Contemplated
Transactions, including all legal and accounting fees and all brokers or finders
fees or commissions payable by GTIA;
(iv) Liabilities
for any Taxes of GTIA, whether or not by reason of, or in connection with, the
Contemplated Transactions, including (A) any Taxes arising as a result of
GTIA’s operation of its business or ownership of the GTIA Purchased Assets prior
to the Closing Date, (B) any liability of GTIA for Taxes of any person under
Treasury Regulation Section 1.1502-6 (or any similar provision of state,
local, or foreign law), as a transferee or successor, by contract, or otherwise,
and (C) any Taxes that will arise as a result of the sale of the GTIA
Purchased Assets pursuant to this Agreement;
(v) Liabilities
attributable to the GTIA Retained Assets; that are incurred outside the ordinary
course of business or not consistent with past practice; or that are not clearly
included in the express terms of the Contracts and Governmental Authorizations
identified in clause (i) of Section 1.1(c);
(vi) Liabilities
to, under or with respect to any Seller Plan or other Benefit Plan and the
administration of any Seller Plan, or relating to payroll, vacation, sick leave,
workers’ compensation, unemployment benefits, disability and occupational
diseases of or with respect to employees or former employees of GTIA, under any
employment, severance, retention or termination agreement with any employee of
GTIA or any of its Related Parties, or arising out of or relating to any
employee grievance whether or not the affected employees are hired by
Purchaser;
(vii) Except
for Indebtedness identified on Schedule 1.1(c), Liabilities of GTIA for
or arising out of any Indebtedness, including any Contract giving rise to any
Indebtedness;
(viii) Liabilities
relating to Legal Proceedings that exist on the Closing Date and any Legal
Proceedings that arise after the Closing Date that arise out of transactions
entered into, or any state of facts existing, on or before the Closing
Date;
(ix) Environmental
Liabilities of GTIA arising out of or relating to:
(A) the
GTIA Retained Assets or any properties previously owned, leased or operated by
GTIA;
(B) any
violation of Environmental Laws existing prior to or as of the Closing Date
arising from or related to (1) the ownership, use or operation of the Business,
any Facility, or any GTIA Purchased Assets; (2) the design, configuration or
condition of any equipment or Facilities; (3) the failure to have or to comply
with any Governmental Authorization required by Environmental Laws prior to or
as of the Closing Date; or (4) the failure to have, maintain or properly operate
programs and equipment for monitoring of, or the failure to report in an
accurate and timely manner any discharges, emissions, Releases, employee
exposures, incidents, or occupational health and safety conditions;
(C) Existing
Environmental Conditions, including any such Environmental Liabilities for (1)
Environmental Remedial Actions to address Existing Environmental Conditions; (2)
claims asserted by any third party (including any employee of GTIA or Purchaser)
for bodily injury, death, or property damage allegedly caused by, or arising
from exposure to, any Existing Environmental Condition; (3) any natural resource
damages arising from any Existing Environmental Condition, and (4) any
Liabilities relating to any off-site transportation, treatment, disposal or
Release of any Regulated Materials resulting from any Environmental Remedial
Action to address Existing Environmental Conditions, whether such Environmental
Remedial Action is taken before or after the Closing Date;
(D) the
storage, transportation, treatment, disposal, discharge, recycling or Release of
any Regulated Material at any Off-Site Location by GTIA on or before the Closing
Date, or the arrangement by GTIA for any storage, transportation, treatment,
disposal, discharge, recycling, or Release of any Regulated Material at any
Off-Site Location on or before the Closing Date; and
(E) any
contractual indemnity obligations relating to requirements of Environmental Law
or Environmental Liabilities that GTIA has undertaken in connection with the
Business or any Facilities;
(x) Liabilities,
including penalties, fines, levies and assessments, arising out of any violation
or breach of, or noncompliance with, any Contracts, Governmental Authorizations
or Legal Requirements by GTIA or any other person acting as agent for or on
behalf of any of GTIA; and
(xi) Liabilities
of GTIA under the MTR Purchase Agreement.
(e) GTIA Purchase
Price. The purchase price for the GTIA Purchased Assets shall
be the proportion of the Purchase Price (as defined in Section 1.3(a)) allocated to the GTIA
Purchased Assets as provided in Section 1.3(c) plus the assumption of
the GTIA Assumed Liabilities (the “GTIA Purchase Price”), as
adjusted and payable in accordance with Section 1.3(c) and Section 1.4.
(f) Allocation
of the GTIA Purchase Price. The GTIA Purchase Price shall be
allocated among the GTIA Purchased Assets in accordance with the allocation set
forth on Schedule 1.1(f). GTIA and Purchaser shall
report the federal, state and local income and other Tax consequences of the
purchase and sale of the GTIA Purchased Assets contemplated hereby in a manner
consistent with such allocation and shall not take any position
inconsistent therewith upon examination of any Tax Return, in any refund claim,
in any litigation, or otherwise unless otherwise required by applicable Legal
Requirements. Any Working Capital Adjustment (as defined in
Section 1.4(a)) or EBITDA True-Up Amount (as defined
in Section 1.4(f)) allocated to the GTIA Purchase Price
shall be allocated among the GTIA Purchased Assets consistent with the allocation set forth on
Schedule
1.1(f) and shall be binding upon GTIA and
Purchaser.
1.2 The
GTMN Transaction. The
transactions set forth in this Section 1.2 are referred to herein
collectively as the “GTMN
Transaction.”
(a) Purchase of GTMN
Purchased Assets. Effective at the Effective Time, Purchaser
shall purchase from GTMN, and GTMN shall sell to Purchaser, free and clear of
all Indebtedness and Encumbrances, except for Indebtedness expressly identified
on Schedule 1.2(c) and
Permitted Encumbrances, all of GTMN’s right, title and interest in and to all
of its assets, properties,
rights and business as a
going concern of every kind, nature and description, wherever located and
whether real, personal or mixed, tangible or intangible, in electronic form or
otherwise, and whether or not having any value for accounting purposes or
carried or reflected on or specifically referred to in its books
or financial statements, related to or used in its operation of the
Business (other than the GTMN Retained Assets, as defined in Section 1.2(b)), including those
identified in this Section 1.2(a) below (collectively, the
“GTMN Purchased Assets”
and, together with the GTIA Purchased Assets, the “Purchased Assets”):
(i) all
of GTMN’s right, title and interest in the leaseholds, leasehold improvements
and fixtures for all Leased Real Property (as defined in Section 4.14) leased by GTMN as
lessee, which is more particularly described on Schedule 4.14, including the Savage
Facility, and including any security deposits for Leased Real Property leased by
GTMN as lessee;
(ii) all
of the parts and supplies inventory, machinery, equipment, shop tools and
equipment, shredders, processing equipment, support equipment, tippers, magnetic
equipment, peripherals, parts, tooling, fork lifts, tractors, trucks,
bulldozers, graders, loaders, unloaders, back hoes, dump trucks, containers,
trailers, cabs, other vehicles (whether titled or untitled), radios, motors,
furniture, office equipment and supplies, fixtures, and other tangible personal
property, owned by GTMN and related to or used in the Business, including those
identified on Schedule 1.2(a)(ii);
(iii) all
inventory of tires, tire shreds, tire chips, crumb rubber and other finished
rubber products located at the Leased Real Property on the Closing
Date;
(iv) all
of GTMN’s computer equipment and related software and licenses related to or
used in the Business, including those identified on Schedule 1.2(a)(iv);
(v) all
other tangible assets located at the Leased Real Property leased by GTMN as
lessee, including the Savage Facility;
(vi) all
of GTMN’s books, records, files, manuals, sales and credit reports, customer
lists, customer records, billing information, routing sheets, warranty records
and similar documents and other information related to or used in the operation
of the Business, whether inscribed on tangible medium or stored in electronic or
other medium, and other assets related to or used in the Business;
(vii) all
of GTMN’s rights under all Contracts related to or used in the Business,
including those identified on Schedule 1.2(a)(vii), including, without
limitation, all Contracts related to GTMN’s acquisition of its
businesses;
(viii) all
of GTMN’s rights under all Governmental Authorizations held by it in connection
with the Business, including those Governmental Authorizations identified on
Schedule 1.2(a)(viii);
(ix) all
of GTMN’s claims, choses in action, causes of action and judgments related to
the Business and all warranties in favor of GTMN related to the Business or the
other assets described in this Section 1.2(a);
(x) all
of GTMN’s right, title and interest in all leases for personal property,
including equipment and rolling stock, entered into in connection with the
Business, including those identified on Schedule 1.2(a)(x), and including security
deposits relating thereto;
(xi) all
notes and accounts receivable and other rights to payment due from customers of
GTMN and the full benefit of any security for such accounts or rights to
payment, other than those notes and accounts receivable and other rights to
payment due from the GTI Group Members or their Affiliates;
(xii) all
of GTMN’s pre-paid expenses (including software license fees, annual license
fees for vehicles, and insurance premiums) related to the Business;
(xiii) all
of GTMN’s intangible rights and property, including goodwill and rights in and
to any trade name, trademark, fictitious name or service mark, or any variant of
any of them, and any applications therefor or registrations thereof (other than
rights in the name “GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota,” which shall be the
subject of the license described in Section 2.2(c), below), and any other
forms of intellectual property, and all research related to the Business
conducted by GTMN, all rights to GTMN’s telephone numbers, facsimile numbers,
e-mail addresses, Internet sites, Internet addresses and domain names thereof
and other listings;
(xiv) all
of GTMN’s customer relationships, outstanding customer orders and goodwill and
right to own and operate its Business; and
(xv) all
assets not otherwise identified above that are owned or leased and used or
employed by GTMN in connection with the Business.
This Section 1.2(a) and the Schedules referred to herein
identify all of the GTMN
Purchased Assets that will be conveyed herein by GTMN. If and to the
extent that GTI has any interest in any of the GTMN Purchased Assets, then at
the Effective Time, GTI shall be deemed to have sold, transferred and assigned
all such interests to Purchaser for no additional
consideration.
(b) GTMN Retained
Assets. GTMN shall retain and the GTMN Purchased Assets shall
not include all of its other assets, including the following (collectively, the
“GTMN Retained
Assets”):
(i) any
of GTMN’s cash and cash equivalents, including bank accounts and mutual fund
accounts;
(ii) any
cash securing any Governmental Authorization held by GTMN;
(iii) any
deposits under closure bonds in the name of
GTMN;
(iv) any
Seller Plans (as defined in Section 4.15) (including any Seller
Plans listed on Schedule 4.15);
(v) any
Tax Returns and Tax records of GTMN and any business records required by law to
be retained by GTMN; provided, that such records
shall be available to Purchaser to the extent reasonably necessary for its Tax
purposes;
(vi) all
of GTMN’s minute and stock book records;
(vii) any
accounts receivable owed to GTMN by any other GTI Group
Member or their Affiliates;
(viii) any
of GTMN’s agreements, Contracts, understandings or business relationships with
GTI or any of its Affiliates (other than the other Seller), except for those
listed and identified as such on Schedule 1.2(a)(vii));
(ix) shares
of stock, equity interests or ownership or debt securities in any other
Person;
(x) all
rights in the name “GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota,” subject to the license
described in Section
2.2(c), below;
and
(xi) all
of GTMN’s rights under the MTR Purchase Agreement.
(c) GTMN Assumed
Liabilities. Effective at the Effective Time, Purchaser shall
assume only (i) the obligations of GTMN existing as of the Effective Time expressly set forth in the
Contracts identified on Schedule 1.2(a)(vii), the Governmental
Authorizations identified on Schedule 1.2(a)(viii), and the payment
obligations for GTMN’s trade payables reflected on the Closing Working Capital
Statement (as defined in Section 1.4(d)), and any Indebtedness
expressly identified on Schedule 1.2(c), none of which will be
repaid at Closing, other than (with respect to any of the preceding in this
clause (i)) for
Liabilities arising out of any violation, breach or non-performance of the terms
or obligations thereunder or expenses, costs or payments owing as of the
Effective Time or applicable prior to the Effective Time; and (ii) other short
term accruals of GTMN expressly identified on the Closing Date Certificate
Example to the extent included in Current Liabilities as provided in Section 0 (collectively, the
“GTMN Assumed Liabilities” and,
together with the GTIA Assumed Liabilities, the “Assumed
Liabilities”).
(d) GTMN Retained
Liabilities. Except for the GTMN Assumed Liabilities,
Purchaser does not hereby and shall not assume or in any way undertake to pay,
perform, satisfy or discharge any Liabilities of any kind or nature whatsoever
of GTMN, GTI or GTIA (except as provided in Section 1.1(c)), existing before, on
or after the Effective Time or arising out of any transactions entered into, or
any state of facts existing before, on or after the Effective Time, and whether
or not related to or arising out of any of the GTMN Purchased Assets (the “GTMN Retained
Liabilities”). Without limiting the foregoing, except as set
forth on the Closing Working Capital Statement in the amounts set forth therein,
the term “GTMN Retained Liabilities” shall include:
(i) Liabilities
arising out of or relating to any product shipped or manufactured by, or any
services provided by, GTMN in whole or in part, prior to the Closing
Date;
(ii) Liabilities
of GTMN to any Related Party;
(iii) Liabilities
the existence of which constitute a breach of the representations, warranties or
covenants of GTMN contained in this Agreement; or for expenses, taxes or fees
incident to or arising out of the negotiation, preparation, approval or
authorization of this Agreement and the consummation of the Contemplated
Transactions, including all legal and accounting fees and all brokers or finders
fees or commissions payable by GTMN;
(iv) Liabilities
for any Taxes of GTMN, whether or not by reason of, or in connection with, the
Contemplated Transactions, including (A) any Taxes arising as a result of GTMN’s
operation of its business or ownership of the GTMN Purchased Assets prior to the
Closing Date, (B) any liability of GTMN for Taxes of any person under Treasury
Regulation Section 1.1502-6 (or any similar provision of state, local, or
foreign law), as a transferee or successor, by contract, or otherwise, and (C)
any Taxes that will arise as a result of the sale of the GTMN Purchased Assets
pursuant to this Agreement;
(v) Liabilities
attributable to GTMN Retained Assets; that are incurred outside the ordinary
course of business or not consistent with past practice; or that are contingent
in nature and not clearly included in the express terms of the Contracts and
Governmental Authorizations identified in clause (i) of Section 1.2(c);
(vi) Liabilities
to, under or with respect to any Seller Plan or other Benefit Plan and the
administration of any Seller Plan, or relating to payroll, vacation, sick leave,
workers’ compensation, unemployment benefits, disability and occupational
diseases of or with respect to employees or former employees of GTMN, under any
employment, severance, retention or termination agreement with any employee of
GTMN or any of its Related Parties, or arising out of or relating to any
employee grievance whether or not the affected employees are hired by
Purchaser;
(vii) Except
for Indebtedness identified on Schedule 1.2(c), Liabilities of GTMN for
or arising out of any Indebtedness, including any Contract giving rise to any
Indebtedness;
(viii) Liabilities
relating to Legal Proceedings that exist on the Closing Date and any Legal
Proceedings that arise after the Closing Date that arise out of transactions
entered into, or any state of facts existing, on or before the Closing
Date;
(ix) Environmental
Liabilities of GTMN arising out of or relating to;
(A) the
GTMN Retained Assets or any properties previously owned, leased or operated by
GTMN;
(B) any
violation of Environmental Laws existing prior to or as of the Closing Date
arising from or related to (1) the ownership, use or operation of the Business,
any Facility, or any GTMN Purchased Assets; (2) the design, configuration or
condition of any equipment or Facilities; (3) the failure to have or to comply
with any Governmental Authorization required by Environmental Laws prior to or
as of the Closing Date; or (4) the failure to have, maintain or properly operate
programs and equipment for monitoring of, or the failure to report in an
accurate and timely manner any discharges, emissions, Releases, employee
exposures, incidents, or occupational health and safety conditions;
(C) Existing
Environmental Conditions, including any such Environmental Liabilities for (1)
Environmental Remedial Actions to address Existing Environmental Conditions; (2)
claims asserted by any third party (including any employee of GTMN or Purchaser)
for bodily injury, death, or property damage allegedly caused by, or arising
from exposure to, any Existing Environmental Condition; (3) any natural resource
damages arising from any Existing Environmental Condition, and (4) any
Liabilities relating to any off-site transportation, treatment, disposal or
Release of any Regulated Materials resulting from any Environmental Remedial
Action to address Existing Environmental Conditions, whether such Environmental
Remedial Action is taken before or after the Closing Date;
(D) the
storage, transportation, treatment, disposal, discharge, recycling or Release of
any Regulated Material at any Off-Site Location by GTMN on or before the Closing
Date, or the arrangement by GTMN for any storage, transportation, treatment,
disposal, discharge, recycling, or Release of any Regulated Material at any
Off-Site Location on or before the Closing Date; and
(E) any
contractual indemnity obligations relating to requirements of Environmental Law
or Environmental Liabilities that GTMN has undertaken in connection with the
Business or any Facilities;
(x) Liabilities,
including penalties, fines, levies and assessments, arising out of any violation
or breach of, or noncompliance with, any Contracts, Governmental Authorizations
or Legal Requirements by GTMN or any other person acting as agent for or on
behalf of GTMN;
(xi) Liabilities
of GTMN under the MTR Purchase Agreement.
(e) GTMN Purchase
Price. The purchase price for the GTMN Purchased Assets shall
be the proportion of the Purchase Price (as defined in Section 1.3(a)) allocated to the GTMN
Purchased Assets as provided in Section 1.3(c) plus the assumption of
the GTMN Assumed Liabilities (the “GTMN Purchase Price”), as
adjusted and payable in accordance with Section 1.3(c) and Section 1.4.
(f) Allocation of the
GTMN Purchase Price. The GTMN Purchase Price
shall be allocated among the GTMN Purchased Assets in accordance with the
allocation set forth on Schedule 1.2(f). GTMN and
Purchaser shall report the federal, state and local income and other Tax
consequences of the purchase and sale of the GTMN Purchased Assets contemplated
hereby in a manner consistent with such allocation and shall not take any
position inconsistent therewith upon examination of any Tax Return, in any
refund claim, in any litigation, or otherwise unless otherwise required by applicable
Legal
Requirement. Any Working Capital Adjustment (as defined in
Section 1.4(a)) or EBITDA True-Up
Amount (as defined in Section 1.4(f)) allocated to the GTMN
Purchase Price shall be allocated among the GTMN Purchased Assets consistent
with the allocation set forth on Schedule 1.2(f) and shall be binding upon
GTMN and Purchaser.
1.3 Purchase
Price.
(a) Purchase
Price. The
aggregate consideration for the Purchased Assets shall be an amount equal to (i)
five dollars ($5.00) for each dollar of EBITDA for the Business (as defined in
and determined pursuant to Section 1.3(b)) for the twelve (12)
month period commencing on October 1, 2007 and ending on September 30, 2008
(the “Measurement
Period”) (such aggregate amount, the “EBITDA Amount”) minus (ii) $492,000 minus (iii) all outstanding
Indebtedness identified on Schedules 1.1(c) and 1.2(c) (which will be assumed
by Purchaser and not paid at Closing) (the “Assumed Indebtedness”), plus (iv) the assumption of
the Assumed Liabilities (such net amount, the “Purchase Price”), adjusted by the Working
Capital Adjustment and subject to the EBITDA True-Up in accordance with Section 1.4. The Purchase
Price shall be allocated among the Purchased Assets as follows: 41.81% of the Purchase Price shall be allocated to the GTIA Purchased Assets
and 58.19% of the Purchase Price shall be allocated to the GTMN Purchased Assets; provided, however, that any Working Capital Adjustment (as defined
below) or EBITDA True-Up Amount (as defined
below) shall be
allocated according to each
Seller’s proportionate contribution to such
Working Capital Adjustment or EBITDA True-Up Amount.
(b) EBITDA. “EBITDA” for the Business means
the earnings of the Business from operations before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization, determined solely in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
(“GAAP”) derived from the unaudited
segmented income statement for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 included
in the unaudited segmented financial statements of Sellers at September 30, 2008
and for the fiscal year then ended (the “2008 Segmented Financial
Statements”), which GTI shall deliver to Purchaser by October 24,
2008. GTI shall reconcile the 2008 Segmented Financial Statements (in
a manner consistent with the reconciliations included in Exhibit J) to the audited
consolidated financial statements of GTI and its subsidiaries at September 30,
2008 and for the fiscal year then ended (the “2008 Audited Financial
Statements”), which reconciliation GTI shall deliver to Purchaser
together with the 2008 Audited Financial Statements by December 12,
2008. EBITDA shall be determined solely and exclusively for the
Business as a stand-alone business enterprise. No extraordinary gains
or losses under GAAP shall be included in determining EBITDA. EBITDA
shall be determined in the ordinary course, consistent with past practice,
through the end of the Measurement Period, except that no items of accelerated
or prepaid income shall be included, no income from Affiliates of or Related
Parties to any GTI Group Member shall be included, no gain or loss on the sale
of assets shall be included, no overhead expense allocation of GTI shall be
included, and no income outside the ordinary course of Business or not
consistent with past practice shall be included. EBITDA shall include
the burden of a full year’s Gainshare (GTI’s bonus program)
compensation.
(c) Payment of the
Purchase Price. Subject to the terms and conditions herein,
the Purchase Price shall be paid as follows:
(i) Deposit. On
July 9, 2008, LTS delivered to BNY Mellon, National Association (the “Escrow Agent”), a deposit of
Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) (the “Initial
Deposit”). At
the date of this Agreement, LTS is delivering to the Escrow Agent an additional
deposit of Two Hundred and
Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000) (the “Second
Deposit” and, together with the Initial Deposit
and all earnings thereon, the “Deposit”). At the Closing, the
Deposit shall be applied against payment of the Purchase Price as provided
in Section 1.3(c)(ii) below. In the event there is
no Closing due to a Seller Fault (as defined below), the parties shall
direct the Escrow Agent to
deliver the Deposit to LTS. In the event there is no Closing for any
reason other than a Seller Fault, the parties shall direct the Escrow Agent to
deliver the Deposit to GTI. For the purposes of this Section 1.3(c)(i) the term “Seller
Fault” shall mean (A) any
misrepresentation by a GTI Group Member the effect of which would have a
material adverse effect on
the value of the Business
or the Purchased Assets,
(B) any failure by a GTI Group Member to deliver at any time prior to the
Closing any requested documentation or information that would materially
adversely affect the value of the Business or the Purchased Assets, (C) a material breach by a GTI
Group Member of this Agreement, (D) any failure by a GTI Group Member to
cooperate fully and in good faith with the LTS Group Members in connection with
their due diligence efforts related to the Contemplated Transactions, (E) any
condition or state of facts identified by an LTS Group Member in connection with
its due diligence efforts reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect
on the value of the Business or the Purchased Assets, (F) failure of a GTI Group Member to obtain all necessary
approvals to close or (G)
the failure of Purchaser or the GTI Group Members, as applicable, to obtain
(x) a Waste Tire Facility Permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency, (y) a Solid Waste Facility License from Scott County Community
Development Division, Environmental Health Department and (z) a Permit for Waste
Tire Processing from the State of Iowa, Department of Natural Resources, as
required for Purchaser to own and operate the Purchased Assets and the Business after the
Closing; provided,
however, there shall be no
“Seller
Fault” unless and until LTS notifies GTI of
its intent to terminate the transaction due to a Seller Fault, and the
applicable GTI Group Member fails to cure (or the parties agree that such GTI Group Member is unable
to cure) the Seller Fault to LTS’s reasonable satisfaction within five
(5) business days following such notice (or as extended by LTS at its sole
discretion).
(ii) Closing
Payment. At Closing, Purchaser (x) shall
direct the Escrow Agent to deliver the
Deposit to GTI and (y) shall deliver to GTI (on behalf of
Sellers) an amount equal to (A) the EBITDA Amount, minus (B) $492,000, minus (C) Assumed
Indebtedness, minus
(D) any Indebtedness that will be repaid at Closing by Purchaser on behalf
of the GTI Group Members (which excludes Assumed Indebtedness), plus or minus, as applicable, (E) an
amount equal to a good faith estimate of the Working Capital Adjustment (unless
such estimate is zero), minus (F) each of the
Purchase Price True-Up Holdback (as defined below) and the Indemnification
Holdback (as defined below), and minus (G) the Deposit (such
net amount, the “Closing
Payment”), by wire transfer of federal funds to an account specified in
writing by GTI at least two
(2) business days prior to the
Closing. The parties agree to use the Initial EBITDA Statement and
the Initial Working Capital Statement for the purposes of determining the
Closing Payment, as provided in Section 1.3(vi) below.
(iii) Indebtedness. At
Closing, LTS shall repay the Closing Date Repayment Indebtedness on behalf of
the GTI Group Members as provided in the payoff letters delivered pursuant to
Section 2.2(a)(vii).
(iv) Indemnification
Holdback. At Closing, Purchaser shall withhold from delivery
of the Purchase Price an amount equal to Five Hundred Thousand Dollars
($500,000) (the “Indemnification
Holdback”). Purchaser may setoff and recoup against the
Indemnification Holdback any amounts due by GTI Group Members to Purchaser
hereunder with respect to any GTI Group Member’s indemnification obligations
under Article
VI. Purchaser shall deliver one-half (1/2) of the
Indemnification Holdback, less any Purchaser claims for setoff or recoupment
under this Agreement, on the date that is 180 days after the Closing Date
(or the next business day if such date is not a business day) by wire transfer
of federal funds to accounts to be designated by GTI within three (3)
business days prior to payment. The remainder of the Indemnification
Holdback not distributed to Purchaser pursuant to this Agreement shall be
delivered to GTI (on behalf of Sellers) on the date that is 365 days after the
Closing Date (or the next business day if such date is not a business day) by
wire transfer of federal funds to accounts to be designated by GTI within
three (3) business days prior to payment.
(v) Purchase Price
True-Up Holdback. At Closing, Purchaser shall withhold from
delivery of the Purchase Price an amount equal to Two Hundred Fifty Thousand
Dollars ($250,000) (the “Purchase Price True-Up Holdback” and,
together with the Indemnification Holdback, the “Holdback”) until the Closing
Statements shall have been finalized and the last of the Purchase Price True-Up
Amount (as such term is defined in Section 1.4(f)(iii)) is
payable. Purchaser may setoff and recoup against the Purchase Price
True-Up Holdback any unpaid Purchase Price True-Up Amount then owing by
Sellers. Purchaser shall deliver the Purchase Price True-Up Holdback,
less any Purchase Price True-Up Amount owing by Sellers under this Agreement, on
the date that is three (3) business days following the date that the last of the
Closing Statements are finalized by wire transfer of federal funds to accounts
to be designated by GTI within three (3) business days prior to
payment.
(vi) Initial EBITDA
Statement and Initial Working Capital Statement. At least five
(5) business days prior to the Closing Date, GTI shall deliver to Purchaser a
certificate certified by GTI’s Chief Financial Officer in a form consistent with
the Closing Date Certificate Example (as defined below) setting
forth:
(A)
GTI’s good faith calculation of EBITDA for the Business (as defined in and
determined pursuant to Section 1.3(b)) based on actual
results for the Measurement Period, along with a copy of Sellers’ proposed
Closing EBITDA Statement (the “Initial EBITDA Statement”),
and all relevant information and support used in preparing the Initial EBITDA
Statement, to be used to determine the Closing Payment, and
(B) GTI’s
good faith calculation of Working Capital of the Business (as defined and
determined pursuant to Section 1.4(c)) as of the Effective
Time, along with a copy of Sellers’ proposed Closing Working Capital Statement
(the “Initial Working Capital
Statement”), and all relevant information and support used in preparing
the Initial Working Capital Statement, to be used to calculate the estimate of
the Working Capital Adjustment and to determine the Closing
Payment.
If within
two (2) business days following receipt thereof, Purchaser has not given GTI
notice of any disagreement with the Initial EBITDA Statement or the Initial
Working Capital Statement, they shall be used to determine the Closing
Payment. If Purchaser gives notice of such disagreement, the parties
will use commercially reasonable good faith efforts to resolve the issues in
dispute. If all disputed issues are resolved, the EBITDA and
estimated Working Capital Adjustment agreed to by the parties shall be used to
determine the Closing Payment. If the parties are unable to resolve
all disputed issues within three (3) business days following Purchaser’s receipt
thereof, the Initial EBITDA Statement and the Initial Working Capital Statement
shall be as determined by Purchaser.
(vii) Closing Date
Certificate Example. The Closing Date Certificate Example
which is Exhibit A to
this Agreement (the “Closing
Date Certificate Example”) contains the parties’ agreed upon form of
Closing Statements and methodologies for determining EBITDA of the Business and
the Closing Date Working Capital based on the Interim Balance Sheet and actual
EBITDA results from October 1, 2007 through the Interim Balance Sheet
Date. The Initial EBITDA Statement, the Initial Working Capital
Statement and the Closing Statements shall be estimated or prepared (as the case
may be) in a manner consistent with the Closing Date Certificate
Example.
(viii) Delivery of
Purchase Price True-Up Amounts. Purchaser or GTI (on behalf of
Sellers), as the case may be, shall deliver (or refund, as the case may be) the
applicable Purchase Price True-Up Amount by wire transfer of federal funds to an
account designated by the other within three (3) business days after such
Purchase Price True-Up Amount is finally determined. Purchaser,
however, may offset, setoff or recoup from the Purchase Price True-Up Holdback
either Purchase Price True-Up Amount that is owed by Sellers to
Purchaser. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if one Purchase Price
True-Up Amount in favor of Purchaser is due and the other Purchase Price True-Up
Amount has not been finally determined at that time, then GTI (on behalf of
Sellers) shall pay directly to Purchaser the Purchase Price True-Up Amount that
is then due, and the full amount of the Purchase Price True-Up Holdback shall
continue to be held by Purchaser to secure the other Purchase Price True-Up
Amount.
(d) Withholding. Purchaser
will be entitled to deduct and withhold from the Purchase Price any withholding
Taxes or other amounts required under the Code or any applicable Legal
Requirements to be deducted and withheld. To the extent that any such
amounts are so deducted and withheld, such amounts will be treated for all
purposes of this Agreement as having been paid to the person or entity in
respect of which such deduction and withholding was made.
1.4 Working
Capital Adjustment and EBITDA True-Up.
(a) Working
Capital Adjustment. The Purchase Price was
determined on the basis that Working Capital for the Business as of the
Effective Time, derived solely from the Closing Working Capital Statement (“Closing
Date Working
Capital”), would equal $1,500,000 (“Target Working
Capital”). If Closing Date Working
Capital (x) is less than Target Working Capital,
then the Purchase Price shall be decreased dollar-for-dollar by the amount of
such deficiency,
or (y) exceeds Target Working Capital, then the
Purchase Price shall be increased dollar-for-dollar by the amount of such excess
(such
adjustment, the
“Working
Capital Adjustment”). The Working Capital
Adjustment shall be without prejudice to the LTS Group Members’ rights of indemnification under
Section 6.1(b) for any breach by any GTI Group Member
of the representations and warranties contained in Article IV (without any right to duplicate
damages).
(b) EBITDA
True-Up. Simultaneously
with determination of the Working Capital Adjustment, Purchaser shall have the
right to review and verify the determination of EBITDA used to calculate the
Purchase Price through review of the Initial EBITDA Statement, subject to the
provisions of this Section
1.4. If as a
result of such review process it is determined that the EBITDA amount used to
calculate the Purchase Price was incorrect, then the Purchase Price shall be
corrected to reflect the proper EBITDA amount as reflected on the Closing EBITDA
Statement (the “EBITDA
True-Up”).
(c) Working
Capital. “Working Capital” for the
Business shall mean Current Assets minus Current Liabilities as of the Closing
Date. “Current
Assets” for the Business, shall include only (A) accounts receivable
that are less than 90 days old, (B) inventory included in the Purchased
Assets, and (C) the unamortized portion of pre-paid expenses (including
software license fees (to the extent that Purchaser elects to use such
software), annual license fees for vehicles, and insurance premiums) to the
extent that they provide commensurate value to Purchaser after the Closing. “Current Liabilities” for the
Business, shall include only (A) trade accounts payable, (B) the
Transferred Employees’ (as defined in Section 3.5) earned and unused
vacation that was accrued during such Transferred Employees’ employment with
Sellers, (C) all severance obligations and change of control payments that
may become payable after the Closing as a result of the consummation of the
Contemplated Transactions, (D) the estimated cost of processing all
unprocessed tires included in the Purchased Assets, and (E) other accrued
current liabilities of the Business. “Working Capital” for the
Business shall include all items without regard to materiality and shall not
include the GTIA Retained Assets or the GTMN Retained Assets (collectively, the
“Retained Assets”) or
the GTIA Retained Liabilities or the GTMN Retained Liabilities (collectively,
the “Retained
Liabilities”). As an example, if the effective date of the
transaction would have been the
Interim Balance Sheet Date, then the Closing Working Capital Statement
would have been as set forth on the Closing Date Certificate
Example.
(d) Preparation of
the Closing EBITDA Statement and Closing Working Capital Statement. Within
sixty (60) days following the Effective Time, Purchaser shall prepare and
deliver to GTI (i) a statement of EBITDA for the Business for the
Measurement Period (the “Closing EBITDA Statement”),
and (ii) a statement of Working Capital for the Business as of the Effective
Time (the “Closing Working
Capital Statement” and, together, the “Closing
Statements”). The Closing Statements shall be derived solely
from the 2008 Segmented Financial Statements and the Interim Balance Sheet,
modified in each case to the extent required to be consistent with the
definitions of EBITDA and Working Capital. Each Closing Statement
shall be prepared and determined in a manner consistent with the
classifications, judgments and estimation and calculation methodologies used in
the preparation of the Closing Date Certificate Example, and any conflict or
ambiguity between this Agreement, the 2008 Segmented Financial Statements and
the Closing Date Certificate Example shall be resolved in favor of the Closing
Date Certificate Example.
(e) Inventory
Observation. The parties shall conduct a physical count and
inspection of the inventory of Sellers within five (5) business days before or
after the Closing Date. Both parties and their accountants may
observe the inventory count, which shall be used as the basis in determining the
inventory in the Closing Working Capital Statement.
(f) Closing
Payments True-Up Amounts.
(i) EBITDA True-Up
Amount. If EBITDA for the Business set forth on the Closing
EBITDA Statement after it is finally determined is in excess of or less than the
EBITDA for the Business used to calculate the Purchase Price and the Closing
Payment set forth in the Initial EBITDA Statement (such difference, the “EBITDA True-Up Amount”), then
Purchaser shall pay to GTI the amount of such excess times five dollars ($5.00),
or GTI shall pay to Purchaser (or Purchaser may offset, setoff or recoup from
the Purchase Price True-Up Holdback the amount that is owed by Sellers to
Purchaser) the amount of such deficiency times five dollars ($5.00), as the case
may be, in accordance with Section 1.3(c)(viii).
(ii) Working Capital
True-Up. If the Working Capital for the Business set forth on
the Closing Working Capital Statement after it is finally determined results in
a Working Capital Adjustment in excess of or less than the estimated Working
Capital Adjustment used to calculate the Closing Payment as set forth in the
Initial Working Capital Statement, then Purchaser shall pay to GTI, or GTI shall
pay to Purchaser (or Purchaser may offset, setoff or recoup from the Purchase
Price True-Up Holdback the amount that is owed by Sellers to Purchaser), as the
case may be, that amount necessary to properly reflect a net payment by GTI of
the full final Working Capital Adjustment as set forth in the Closing Working
Capital Statement (the “Working
Capital True-Up Amount”), in accordance with Section 1.3(c)(viii).
(iii) Purchase Price
True-Up Amounts. The EBITDA True-Up Amount and the Working
Capital True-Up Amount are sometimes referred to herein together as the “Purchase Price True-Up
Amounts.”
(g) Allocation
of the Working Capital Adjustment and EBITDA True-Up Amount. The Working Capital Adjustment and EBITDA
True-Up Amount shall be allocated among the GTIA Purchase Price and the GTMN
Purchase Price by reference to the source of any Working Capital Adjustment or
EBITDA True-Up Amount in the Closing Statements.
(h) Disputes
Regarding Working Capital Adjustment or EBITDA True-Up
Amount. Purchaser and GTI shall each provide the other
with access to all relevant information used in preparing the Closing
Statements. GTI shall have sixty (60) days after its receipt of the
Closing Statements to dispute the Closing Statements and Working Capital
Adjustment and EBITDA True-Up Amount or the Closing Statements and Working
Capital Adjustment and EBITDA True-Up Amount shall be deemed to be accepted and
final. Any objection notice to any such Closing Statements must state
with reasonable specificity the amounts and reasons for
disagreement. GTI and Purchaser shall thereafter use commercially
reasonable efforts to agree on the disputed amounts and if they are unable to do
so within thirty (30) days of receipt by Purchaser of GTI’s objection notice,
GTI and Purchaser shall promptly engage a mutually agreed upon firm of
independent accountants to resolve their dispute. In the absence of
prompt agreement on the identity of the independent accountants, the parties
shall engage the accounting firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP of Minneapolis,
Minnesota to resolve the dispute as soon as practicable. The
independent accountants’ decisions shall be final, binding and conclusive upon
the parties and shall be the parties’ sole and exclusive remedy regarding any
dispute concerning the Closing Statements and the Working Capital Adjustment and
EBITDA True-Up Amount. Purchaser and GTI shall share equally the fees
and expenses of the independent accountants.
(i) Interpretation. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary
in this Agreement, the provisions of this Section 1.4, together with the provisions of this
Agreement giving effect to the Working Capital Adjustment and EBITDA True-Up Amount,
shall not be interpreted or construed in any manner that would result in
duplication of benefits or obligations.
1.5 Separate
Transactions. Each
of the GTIA Transaction and the GTMN Transaction (individually, a “Transaction”, and collectively, the
“Transactions”) is
independent, separate and discrete from each other Transaction for Tax and
accounting purposes and asset conveyance
documentation. Notwithstanding such separate treatment, neither
Transaction may close without both Transactions closing at the same
time.
1.6 Certain
Consents. Nothing
in this Agreement shall be construed as an attempt to assign any Contract or
Governmental Authorization included in the Purchased Assets and as to which all
the remedies for the enforcement thereof enjoyed by Sellers would not, as a
matter of law, pass to Purchaser as an incident of the assignments provided for
by this Agreement, without an applicable Legal Approval or
Consent. If any such Legal Approvals or Consents are not obtained
prior to Closing, Purchaser shall have the option to forego any one or more of
such assignments and not assume the obligations and liabilities under any one or
more of such Contracts or Governmental Authorizations (in which case the rights
and obligations under such specified Contracts or Governmental Authorizations
shall be Retained Assets and Retained Liabilities, respectively), and Sellers
shall, at the request and under the direction of Purchaser, in the name of
Sellers or otherwise as Purchaser shall specify, take all commercially
reasonable action (including the appointment of Purchaser as attorney-in-fact
for Sellers) and do or cause to be done all such commercially reasonable things
as shall in the reasonable opinion of Purchaser or its counsel be necessary or
proper (i) to assure that the rights of Sellers under such Contracts or
Governmental Authorizations shall be preserved for the benefit of Purchaser, and
(ii) to facilitate receipt of the consideration to be received by Sellers
in and under every such Contract or Governmental Authorization, which
consideration shall be held for the exclusive benefit of, and shall be delivered
to, Purchaser, and Sellers shall continue to use their commercially reasonable
efforts to obtain such Legal Approvals and Consents as soon as reasonably
possible after Closing. Nothing in this Section 1.6 shall in any way
diminish Sellers’ obligations hereunder to obtain all Consents or Legal
Approvals and to take all such other actions prior to or at Closing as are
necessary to enable Sellers to convey or assign valid title to all Contracts and
Governmental Authorizations to Purchaser.
ARTICLE II
Closing;
Conditions to Closing; Termination
2.1 Closing;
Effective Time. The
parties to this Agreement shall consummate the purchase and sale of the
Purchased Assets, the assumption of the Assumed Liabilities, and the other
Contemplated Transactions (“Closing”) at the offices of K&L Gates LLP,
Henry W. Oliver Building, 535 Smithfield Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15222-6501 on the date that is five (5)
business days after satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Sections 2.2(a) and 2.2(b) below or such other
date as the parties mutually agree (the “Closing
Date”). Closing shall be
deemed to take place effective as of 11:59 p.m. on the Closing Date (the “Effective
Time”). Title to all Purchased Assets shall pass from Sellers,
respectively, to Purchaser at the Effective Time, subject to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement. Purchaser assumes no risk of loss to
the Purchased Assets prior to the Effective Time.
2.2 Certain
Conditions to Close; Closing Deliveries.
(a) Conditions
Precedent to Obligations of Purchaser. The obligation of Purchaser
to proceed with the Closing is subject to the fulfillment prior to or at Closing
of the conditions set forth in this Section 2.2(a). Any one or
more of these conditions may be waived in whole, or in part, by Purchaser at
Purchaser’s sole option.
(i) The
representations and warranties of the GTI Group Members contained in Article IV shall be accurate and
complete, individually and collectively, in all material respects (a) as of
the date of this Agreement and (b) as of the Closing Date as if made on
the Closing Date (except for those representations and warranties contained in
Article IV that
relate to a specific date, which representations and warranties shall be
accurate and complete in all material respects as of such date). The
representations and warranties of the GTI Group Members contained in Article IV that contain an express
materiality qualifier shall be accurate and complete, individually and
collectively, in all respects (x) as of the date of this Agreement and
(y) as of the Closing Date as if made on the Closing Date (except for
those representations and warranties contained in Article IV that relate to a specific
date, which representations and warranties shall be accurate and complete in all
respects as of such date). Each GTI Group Member shall have performed
all of the covenants and agreements and complied with all of the provisions
required by this Agreement to be performed or complied with, individually and
collectively, in all material respects, by such party at or before the Closing
Date.
(ii) No
Legal Requirement shall be in effect that prohibits or threatens to prohibit the
Contemplated Transactions or that would limit or adversely affect Purchaser’s
ownership of the Purchased Assets or control of the Assumed
Liabilities. No Legal Proceeding shall be pending or threatened
challenging the lawfulness of the Contemplated Transactions or seeking to
prevent or delay any of the Contemplated Transactions, or seeking relief by
reason of the Contemplated Transactions. Neither the GTI Group
Members nor LTS Group Members shall have received any claim by any Person
(written or oral) asserting that any Person other than Sellers (A) is the
legal or beneficial owner of the Purchased Assets, (B) has any Encumbrance
(other than Permitted Encumbrances) on or Security Rights in the Purchased
Assets, or (C) is entitled to all or any portion of the Purchase
Price.
(iii) Between
the date of this Agreement and the Closing Date, there shall have been no
change, event, development or occurrence that has had or would reasonably be
expected to have a material adverse effect, regardless of insurance coverage, on
the Business or the Purchased Assets, results of operations, Liabilities, or
condition, financial or otherwise, of Sellers, taken together as a whole (a
“Material Adverse
Effect”).
(iv) The
GTI Group Members shall have delivered a certificate, dated as of the Closing
Date, in a form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Purchaser, certifying
to the fulfillment of the conditions set forth in Sections 2.2(a)(i) through (a)(iii). The
contents of that certificate shall constitute a representation and warranty of
the GTI Group Members as of the Closing Date and shall be deemed relied upon by
Purchaser and fully incorporated in this Agreement.
(v) Each
party shall have received all Legal Approvals necessary or advisable to
consummate the Contemplated Transactions. Without limiting the
foregoing, Sellers shall have received the Legal Approvals identified on Schedule 4.3. Sellers shall
have received all Consents identified on Schedule 2.2(a)(v). Purchaser
shall have received all Governmental Authorizations necessary to own and operate
the Purchased Assets and the Business, in form and substance reasonably
satisfactory to Purchaser.
(vi) Mark
Maust shall have executed and delivered to Purchaser the Employment Agreement
substantially in the form of Exhibit B to this
Agreement.
(vii) Purchaser
shall have received copies of the payoff letters received by Sellers from their
creditors for all Closing Date Repayment Indebtedness as of the Closing Date, in
form and substance reasonably acceptable to Purchaser, stating that all
Encumbrances held by such creditors on any Purchased Assets shall be released
upon payment of the Closing Date Repayment Indebtedness as provided
therein. All other Encumbrances, other than Permitted Encumbrances,
on any Purchased Assets shall have been released.
(viii) Purchaser
shall have received an estoppel certificate from each lessor of Leased Real
Property included in the Purchased Assets, in form and substance reasonably
satisfactory to Purchaser, and Purchaser shall have entered into an amended
lease with respect to each Business Facility on terms and conditions reasonably
satisfactory to Purchaser (including, without limitation, environmental
indemnification for all preexisting conditions).
(ix) Each
Seller shall provide Purchaser with a certificate, duly executed and
acknowledged by an officer of such Seller under penalties of perjury, in the
form prescribed by Treasury Regulation Section 1.1445-(2)(b)(2) and
reasonably satisfactory to Purchaser, certifying that such Seller is not a
“foreign person.”
(x) The
stockholders of GTI shall have approved the Contemplated
Transactions.
(xi) GTI
shall have received the opinion of BCC Advisers, of Des Moines, Iowa as to the
fairness of the Purchase Price.
(xii) Purchaser
shall have received (A) from Chicago Title Insurance Company (I) leasehold
title insurance policies issued to Purchaser with respect to the Leased Real
Property being conveyed to Purchaser with such endorsements as may be requested
by Purchaser and containing only such exceptions that are acceptable to
Purchaser, in its sole and absolute discretion, and (II) lender’s policies
issued to Purchaser’s lenders with such endorsements as may be requested by such
lenders and containing only such exceptions that are acceptable to such lenders,
in their sole and absolute discretion, and (B) an ALTA/ACSM as built survey of
each parcel for such Leased Real Property in a form and showing such matters as
are acceptable to Purchaser, in its sole and absolute discretion.
(xiii) Purchaser
shall have obtained on terms and conditions satisfactory to it funds sufficient
to consummate the Contemplated Transactions.
(xiv) Purchaser
shall also have received the deliveries referred to in Section 2.2(c). All
certificates, opinions and other documents delivered by the GTI Group Members to
Purchaser under this Agreement shall be reasonably satisfactory to Purchaser in
form and substance.
(xv) Purchaser
or the GTI Group Members, as applicable, shall have received (x) a Waste Tire Facility Permit
from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, (y) a Solid Waste Facility License
from Scott County Community Development Division, Environmental Health Department and (z) a Permit for
Waste Tire Processing from the State of Iowa, Department of Natural Resources,
as required for Purchaser to own and operate the Purchased Assets and the
Business after the Closing.
(xvi) Purchaser
shall have received (x) the Sublease Agreement for Iowa Parcel I, the form of
which is attached hereto as Exhibit C, duly executed by
Maust Asset Management Co., LLC, (y) the Real Property Lease for Iowa Parcels G
& H, the form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit D, duly executed
by Maust Asset Management Co., LLC and (z) the Real Property Lease for Minnesota
Location, the form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit E, duly executed by
Two Oaks, LLC.
(b) Conditions
Precedent to Obligations of the GTI Group Members. The
obligation of the GTI Group Members to proceed with the Closing is subject to
the fulfillment prior to or at Closing of the conditions set forth in this Section 2.2(b). Any one or
more of these conditions may be waived in whole, or in part, by Sellers at
Sellers’ sole option.
(i) The
representations and warranties of the LTS Group Members contained in Article V shall be accurate and
complete, individually and collectively, in all material respects (a) as of
the date of this Agreement and (b) as of the Closing Date as if made on the
Closing Date (except for those representations and warranties contained in Article V that relate to
a specific date, which representations and warranties shall be accurate and
complete in all material respects as of such date). The
representations and warranties of the LTS Group Members contained in Article V that contain an express
materiality qualifier shall be accurate and complete, individually and
collectively, in all respects (x) as of the date of this Agreement and
(y) as of the Closing Date as if made on the Closing Date (except for those
representations and warranties contained in Article V that relate to a
specific date, which representations and warranties shall be accurate and
complete in all respects as of such date). Each LTS Group Member
shall have performed all of the covenants and agreements and complied with all
of the provisions required by this Agreement to be performed or complied with,
individually and collectively, in all material respects, by such party at or
before the Closing Date.
(ii) No
Legal Requirement shall be in effect that prohibits or threatens to prohibit the
Contemplated Transactions. No Legal Proceeding shall be pending or
threatened challenging the lawfulness of the Contemplated Transactions, seeking
to prevent or delay any of the Contemplated Transactions or seeking relief by
reason of the Contemplated Transactions.
(iii) The
LTS Group Members shall have delivered a certificate, dated as of the Closing
Date, in a form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Sellers, certifying to
the fulfillment of the conditions set forth in Sections 2.2(b)(i) and (ii). The contents
of that certificate shall constitute a representation and warranty of the LTS
Group Members as of the Closing Date and shall be deemed relied upon by Sellers
and fully incorporated in this Agreement.
(iv) The
Contemplated Transactions shall have been duly authorized by the directors and
stockholders of each of the GTI Group Members in compliance with their
respective governing documents and applicable Legal
Requirements. Without limiting the foregoing, the stockholders of GTI
shall have approved the Contemplated Transactions.
(v) The
Contemplated Transactions shall have been duly authorized by the managers of
LTS.
(vi) Purchaser
shall have obtained on terms and conditions satisfactory to it funds sufficient
to consummate the Contemplated Transactions.
(vii) Sellers
shall also have received the deliveries referred to in Section 2.2(d). All
certificates, opinions and other documents delivered by the LTS Group Members to
Sellers under this Agreement shall be reasonably satisfactory to Sellers in form
and substance.
(viii) Each
of the GTIA Transaction and the GTMN Transaction shall close simultaneously on
the Closing Date.
(c) Deliveries
by Sellers. Sellers shall deliver to
Purchaser at Closing:
(i) general warranty bills
of sale and instruments of assignment to the Purchased Assets, duly executed by
each Seller; (ii)
assumption agreements, duly executed by each Seller; (iii) assignments of lease to each parcel of
Leased Real Property that is subject to a written lease, and title certificates
(properly assigned or endorsed) to any motor vehicles and licensed trailers
included in the Purchased
Assets; (iv) assignments of all
transferable or assignable licenses, Governmental Authorizations and warranties
relating to the Purchased Assets and of any trademarks, trade names, patents and
other intellectual property which are included in the Purchased Assets, duly
executed by each Seller; (v) a raw material feedstock Supply
Agreement, in the form
of Exhibit F to this Agreement, duly executed by Sellers;
(vi) a Transition Services
Agreement, in the form
of Exhibit G to this Agreement, duly executed by each Seller;
(vii) licenses, in the
form of Exhibit H, duly executed by each Seller, granting the Purchaser the right
to use the trade names and trademarks “GreenMan Technologies of
Iowa” and “GreenMan Technologies of
Minnesota” in connection
with the Business in the States of Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois, Indiana,
Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wisconsin;
(viii) a good standing certificate
for each GTI Group Member from its respective state of incorporation, all
relevant documents reasonably requested by the LTS Group Members relating to the
authorization by the GTI Group Members to enter into and consummate this
Agreement, and legal
opinions with respect to such matters (and subject to such qualifications) as
are customary in transactions similar to the Contemplated Transactions, from counsel to the
GTI Group Members, as may be reasonably requested by the LTS Group Members;
(ix) a
secretary’s and incumbency certificate of each GTI
Group Member, attaching certified copies of their organic documents, and all
resolutions of the Board of Directors of each GTI Group Member authorizing the
execution and delivery of this Agreement and the performance by it of the
Contemplated Transactions;
and (x) such
other agreements and documents as Purchaser may reasonably request.
(d) Deliveries
by Purchaser. Purchaser shall deliver or
cause to be delivered to Sellers at the Closing: (i) wire transfers of federal funds equal (in the aggregate) to
the Closing Payment (and shall direct the Escrow Agent to deliver the Deposit to
GTI pursuant to Section
1.3(c)(ii);
(ii) assumption agreements,
duly executed by Purchaser; (iii) a raw material feedstock Supply
Agreement, in the form of Exhibit F to this Agreement, duly executed by Purchaser;
(iv) a Transition Services
Agreement, in the form of Exhibit G to this Agreement, duly executed by Purchaser;
(v) the licenses described
in Section
2.2(c), duly executed by
Purchaser; (vi) a good
standing certificate for each LTS Group Member from its respective state of
organization, all relevant documents reasonably
requested by the GTI Group Members relating to the authorization by the LTS
Group Members to enter into
and consummate this Agreement, and legal opinions with respect to such matters
(and subject to such qualifications) as are customary in
transactions similar to the Contemplated Transactions, from counsel to the LTS
Group Members, as may be reasonably requested by the GTI Group Members; (vii) a
secretary’s and incumbency certificate of each LTS
Group Member, attaching certified copies of their
organic documents, and all resolutions of the Board of Managers of each LTS
Group Member authorizing the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the
performance by it of the Contemplated Transactions; and (viii) such
other agreements and documents as Sellers may reasonably request.
2.3 Termination
Prior to the Effective Time.
(a) Events of
Termination. Subject to Section 1.3(c)(i), this Agreement may
be terminated in writing at any time prior to the Effective Time
by:
(i) the
mutual consent of the parties;
(ii) Purchaser,
if any of the conditions specified in Section 2.2(a) shall not have been
fulfilled (or if satisfaction becomes impossible) on or before December 31,
2008, and shall not have been waived by Purchaser;
(iii) Sellers,
if any of the conditions specified in Section 2.2(b) shall not have been
fulfilled (or if satisfaction becomes impossible) on or before December 31,
2008, and shall not have been waived by Sellers;
(iv) Purchaser,
if a material breach of any provision of this Agreement has been committed by a
GTI Group Member and such breach has not been waived by Purchaser or cured by
such GTI Group Member within five (5) business days after receipt of written
notice of such breach from Purchaser;
(v) Sellers,
if a material breach of any provision of this Agreement has been committed by an
LTS Group Member and such breach has not been waived by Sellers or cured by such
LTS Group Member within five (5) business days after receipt of
written notice of such breach from Sellers;
(vi) the GTI Group Members, subject to
complying with the terms of this Agreement, upon the decision by the Board of
Directors of any GTI Group Member to enter into a binding written agreement
concerning a transaction that constitutes a Superior Proposal, if GTI notifies
Purchaser in writing that it intends to enter into such an agreement;
provided,
however, that the GTI Group Members may not effect such termination
unless contemporaneously therewith they pay to Purchaser, by wire
transfer of immediately available federal funds to an account designated by
Purchaser, the Termination Fee;
(vii) Purchaser,
if the Board of Directors of any GTI Group Member shall have taken any of the
actions described in the first sentence of Section 3.7(b), or any GTI Group
Member has breached or is deemed to have breached any of the material provisions
of Section 3.7, in which event the GTI
Group Members shall pay to Purchaser, by wire transfer of immediately available
federal funds to an account designated by Purchaser, the Termination Fee;
and
(viii) Purchaser
or GTI, if GTI’s shareholders do not approve the Contemplated Transactions at
the GTI Shareholders’ Meeting; provided, however, that GTI
may not effect such termination unless GTI pays to Purchaser, by wire transfer
of immediately available federal funds to an account designated by Purchaser,
within three (3) business days following the later of such termination and the
receipt of LTS’s demand, the documented legal fees and other out-of-pocket costs
actually incurred by the LTS Group Members with respect to the Contemplated
Transactions, up to a maximum of $150,000.
Subject
to Section 1.3(c)(i), if either party
terminates this Agreement for any reason other than described in clauses (i),
(vi), (vii) and (viii) of the preceding sentence, Purchaser and Sellers shall be
liable to the other for any material breach of this Agreement by such party
which breach led to such termination. Subject to Section 1.3(c)(i) and clauses (vi), (vii)
and (viii) of the second preceding sentence, if the closing hereunder does not
occur on or before December 31, 2008, and neither party’s material breach of
this Agreement was the cause of the failure to close by that date, then neither
party shall have any liability to the other party under this Agreement, and this
Agreement shall terminate.
(b) Exception. As
provided above, if (i) any GTI Group Member terminates this Agreement under
Section 2.3(a)(vi), or
(ii) Purchaser terminates this Agreement under Section 2.3(a)(vii), then, in the case
of any such termination described in clause (i) or clause (ii) of this sentence,
within three (3) business days following such termination, the GTI Group Members
shall pay to Purchaser in cash by wire transfer in immediately available funds
to an account designated by Purchaser a termination fee in an amount equal to
four percent (4%) of the Purchase Price (the “Termination
Fee”). The Termination Fee constitutes liquidated damages,
because calculation of actual damages would be speculative, and the Termination
Fee represents the parties’ reasonable estimate of actual damages.
ARTICLE III
Certain
Covenants
3.1 Restrictive
Covenants.
(a) Noncompetition
Covenant. The
GTI Group Members acknowledge that Sellers have sold substantially all of the
operating assets together with the goodwill of the Business to
Purchaser. For a period of five (5) years from and after the
Effective Time, provided, that Purchaser (or
Purchaser’s successor) continues to operate the Business in the specified
geographic area identified below for such five (5) year period, no GTI Group
Member or their Affiliates shall directly or indirectly (i) own, manage,
operate, join, control or participate in the ownership, management, operation or
control of, or be employed or otherwise connected as an agent, security holder,
consultant, stockholder, subsidiary, partner or otherwise with, any person,
firm, corporation or business that engages in any activity that is the same as,
similar to, or competitive with the Used Tire Business, anywhere within the
states of Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri,
Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wisconsin (the “Territory”) or (ii) sell crumb
rubber to any Person who is a customer of the Business as of the date of this
Agreement; provided,
however, that such covenant shall not prohibit the GTI Group Members or
any of their Affiliates from purchasing tire derived feedstock for
manufacturing, marketing, selling and otherwise dealing with end-products
(excluding tire derived mulch and crumb rubber for fields) and alternative fuel
and energy made from or containing used tires, tire shreds, tire chips, crumb
rubber and any other byproducts of used tires. “Used Tire Business” means the
collection, disposal, shredding, processing, recycling or sale of used tires
including without limitation the production of tire derived fuel chips, tire
derived mulch, tire shreds, crumb rubber and other tire derived
feedstock.
(b) Nonsolicitation
Covenants. For
a period of five (5) years from and after the Effective Time, no GTI Group
Member shall, directly or indirectly: (i) solicit the business
related to the Used Tire Business within the Territory of any Person who is a
customer of Sellers at the Closing Date; (ii) cause, induce or attempt to cause
or induce any customer, supplier, licensee, licensor, franchisee, employee,
consultant or other business relation of Purchaser to cease doing business
related to the Used Tire Business with Purchaser, to deal with any competitor of
Purchaser related to the Used Tire Business or in any way interfere with its
relationship with Purchaser related to the Used Tire Business; (iii) cause,
induce or attempt to cause or induce any customer, supplier, licensee, licensor,
franchisee, employee, consultant or other business relation of Sellers on the
Closing Date or within the year preceding the Closing Date to cease doing
business related to the Used Tire Business with Purchaser, to deal with any
competitor of Purchaser related to the Used Tire Business or in any way
interfere with its relationship with Purchaser related to the Used Tire
Business; or (iv) hire, retain or attempt to hire or retain any employee or
independent contractor of Purchaser or its Affiliates related to the Used Tire
Business or in any way interfere with the relationship between Purchaser and any
of its employees or independent contractors in connection with the Used Tire
Business. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Section 3.1(b) shall prohibit any GTI
Group Member (x) from causing or inducing any customer, supplier, licensee,
licensor, franchisee, consultant or other business relation of Purchaser to
conduct business with such GTI Group Member outside of the Territory; or, (y)
from placing employment advertisements in newspapers of general circulation or
posting such advertisements on Web sites accessible to the general public,
subject to the restriction set forth in clause (iv) above.
(c) Tax
Clearance Certificate. Upon request of
Purchaser, Sellers shall take all actions necessary to comply with any
applicable tax clearance certificate procedures in connection with the
Contemplated Transactions.
(d) Enforcement. The
restrictive covenants contained in this Section 3.1 are covenants
independent of any other provision of this Agreement and the existence of any
claim that any GTI Group Member may allege against any LTS Group Member, whether
based on this Agreement or otherwise, shall not prevent the enforcement of these
covenants. Each GTI Group Member agrees that Purchaser’s remedies at
law for any breach or threat of breach by any GTI Group Member of the provisions
of this Section 3.1 will be inadequate, and
Purchaser shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches
of the provisions of this Section 3.1 and to enforce
specifically the terms and provisions hereof, in addition to any other remedy to
which Purchaser may be entitled at law or equity. In the event of
litigation regarding the covenant not to compete contained in Section 3.1(a), the prevailing party in
such litigation shall, in addition to any other remedies the prevailing party
may obtain in such litigation, be entitled to recover from the other party its
reasonable legal fees and out of pocket costs incurred by such party in
enforcing or defending its rights hereunder. The length of time for
which such covenant not to compete shall be in force shall not include any
period of violation or any other period required for litigation during which
Purchaser seeks to enforce such covenant. Should any provision of
this Section 3.1 be adjudged to any
extent invalid by any competent tribunal, such provision shall be deemed
modified to the minimum extent necessary to make it enforceable.
3.2 Certain
Tax and Other Matters.
(a) Tax
Indemnification. Each GTI Group Member shall jointly and
severally indemnify Purchaser and its Affiliates and hold them harmless from and
against any loss, claim, liability, expense, or other damage attributable to:
(i) all Taxes of Sellers (including, without limitation, all Taxes of Sellers
resulting from the Contemplated Transactions); and (ii) all Taxes of any member
of an affiliated, combined or unitary group of which any Seller is or was a
member including pursuant to Treasury Regulations Section 1.1502-6 or any
analogous or similar provision of state, local or foreign law (including,
without limitation, any such Taxes resulting from the Contemplated
Transactions). Each LTS Group Member shall jointly and severally
indemnify Sellers and their Affiliates and hold them harmless from and against
any loss, claim, liability, expense, or other damage attributable to all Taxes
of Purchaser (including, without limitation, all Taxes of Purchaser resulting
from the Contemplated Transactions).
(b) Straddle
Period. The portion of real and personal property Taxes
attributable to any of the Purchased Assets (“Property Taxes”) for any
taxable period which includes, but does not end on, the Closing Date (a “Straddle Period”) shall be
apportioned between the portion of such taxable period through the end of the
Closing Date (the “Pre-Closing
Period”) and the portion of such taxable period beginning on the day
after the Closing Date (the “Post-Closing Period”) as
provided in this Section 3.2(b). The
portion of any such Straddle Period Property Tax attributable to the Pre-Closing
Period shall be deemed to be the amount of such Tax for the entire taxable
period multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days in
the taxable period ending on the Closing Date and the denominator of which is
the total number of days in the relevant Straddle Period. The GTI
Group Members shall be jointly and severally liable for and shall hold Purchaser
and its Affiliates harmless against the portion of any such Straddle Period
Property Taxes apportioned to the Pre-Closing Period in accordance with this
Section 3.2(b). The LTS
Group Members shall be jointly and severally liable for and shall hold the
Sellers and their Affiliates harmless against the portion of any such Straddle
Period Property Taxes apportioned to the Post-Closing Period in accordance with
this Section 3.2(b). The GTI Group Members
shall pay to Purchaser or the LTS Group Members shall pay to the Sellers, as the
case may be, any portion of Straddle Period Property Taxes for which they are
liable pursuant to this Section 3.2(b) within five (5) days
of their receipt of written notice of the amount of such Straddle Period
Property Taxes attributable to the relevant period.
(c) Transfer
Taxes. The sales, use or transfer Tax Returns required by
reason of the transfer of the Purchased Assets shall be timely prepared and
filed by the party primarily or customarily responsible under applicable law for
filing such sales, use or transfer Tax Returns. The parties agree to
cooperate in good faith with each other in connection with the preparation and
filing of such Tax Returns, in obtaining all available exemptions from such
sales, use and transfer Taxes and in timely providing each other with resale
certificates and any other documents necessary to satisfy any such
exemptions. All such sales, use or transfer Taxes required to be paid
by reason of the transfer of Purchased Assets hereunder shall be paid one-half
by Purchaser and one-half by GTI, and Purchaser or GTI, as the case may be,
shall indemnify and hold harmless the other party from any loss, claim,
liability, expense, or other damage attributable to the failure of Purchaser or
GTI, as the case may be, to pay one-half of such Taxes.
(d) Mutual
Cooperation. Purchaser and Sellers shall each assist the
other, as may reasonably be requested by either of them, with the preparation of
any Tax Return, any Tax audit, or any judicial or administrative proceedings
relating to any Tax. In addition, each party shall retain and provide
the other with any records or information that may be relevant to such Tax
Return, Tax audit, proceeding or determination. The party requesting
assistance under this Section 3.2(d) shall reimburse the
party providing assistance for direct expenses incurred in providing such
assistance.
3.3 Covenants
Prior to the Effective Time.
(a) Conduct of
Business. Between the date of this Agreement and the Effective
Time, unless Purchaser otherwise consents in writing, the GTI Group Members
shall conduct the affairs of Sellers and the Business as follows:
(i) Ordinary Course;
Compliance. The Business shall be conducted only in the
ordinary course and consistent with past practice. Without limiting
the foregoing, Sellers shall not accelerate any income or defer any expenses
that would increase EBITDA during the remainder of the Measurement Period in any
manner inconsistent with historical results or that would in any way cause
EBITDA to be unsustainable after the Measurement Period. Sellers
shall maintain the Purchased Assets and Assumed Liabilities consistent with past
practice and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to comply in a timely
fashion with the provisions of all Contracts, Governmental Authorizations and
Legal Requirements applicable to Sellers and the Business. Sellers
shall use commercially reasonable efforts to keep the Business organization
intact, keep available the services of their present employees and preserve the
goodwill of their suppliers, customers and others having business relations with
Sellers. Sellers shall maintain in full force and effect the policies
of insurance disclosed on Schedule 4.17, subject only to
variations required by the ordinary operations of the Business. In
the alternative, Sellers shall obtain prior to the lapse of any such policy
substantially similar coverage with insurers of recognized
standing.
(ii) Transactions. Sellers
shall not: (A) enter into or amend any Contract or Governmental
Authorization, the performance of which may extend beyond the Closing, except in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice; (B) enter
into or amend any employment or consulting contract with any employee of a
Seller that is not terminable at will and without penalty or continuing
obligation; (C) knowingly fail to pay any Tax or any other Liability or
charge when due, other than charges contested in good faith by appropriate
proceedings and brought to the attention of Purchaser; (D) intentionally
take any action or omit to take any action that will cause a breach or
termination of any Contract or Governmental Authorization, other than
termination by fulfillment of its terms in the ordinary course of business;
(E) allow the levels of inventory or raw materials, supplies or other
materials included in the inventories to vary materially from the levels
customarily maintained; (F) enter into any compromise or settlement of any
material litigation, proceeding or governmental investigation relating to the
Business; or (G) take any action that is likely to result in the occurrence
of any event described in Section 4.8 or cause the breach or
inaccuracy of any other representation and warranty in Article IV as of the date of
this Agreement or on the Closing Date. Sellers shall confer with
Purchaser prior to implementing operational decisions of the Business of a
material nature.
(iii) Access,
Information and Documents. Sellers shall give to Purchaser and
to Purchaser’s employees, representatives and agents (including accountants,
actuaries, financial advisors, attorneys, environmental consultants and
engineers) access during normal business hours to all of the properties, books,
Tax Returns, Contracts, commitments, records, officers, other personnel and
accountants (including independent public accountants and their audit workpapers
concerning Sellers) of the Business. Sellers shall furnish to
Purchaser all such documents and copies of documents and all information with
respect to the properties, Liabilities, financial position and performance and
affairs of Sellers and the Business as Purchaser may reasonably
request. To the extent required by the LTS Group Members’ lenders,
Purchaser shall have the right to have the Leased Real Property and tangible
personal property included in the Purchased Assets inspected by Purchaser, at
Purchaser’s sole cost and expense, for purposes of determining the physical
condition and legal characteristics of the Leased Real Property and tangible
personal property. In the event subsurface or other invasive testing
is recommended by any representatives of Purchaser, Purchaser shall be permitted
to have the same performed.
3.4 Fulfillment
of Conditions and Agreements Prior to Closing; Legal Approvals;
Consents. Each
party shall cooperate with the others and use commercially reasonable efforts to
take, or cause to be taken, all action and do, or cause to be done, all things
necessary, proper or advisable, including making or obtaining any and all Legal
Approvals or Consents, to consummate and make effective the Contemplated
Transactions, including making all filings under applicable Legal
Requirements. Without limiting the foregoing, prior to the Closing,
each of the GTI Group Members shall take all actions and do all things
necessary, proper or advisable to consummate and make effective as promptly as
practicable the Contemplated Transactions and to cooperate with others in
connection with the foregoing, including using its reasonable commercial efforts
to: (a) secure all Legal Approvals and Consents from
Governmental Bodies or third parties as may be required in order to enable
Sellers and Purchaser to effect the Contemplated Transactions and to enable
Purchaser to conduct the Business in substantially the same manner as it was
conducted prior to the Closing Date; (b) lift or rescind any injunction or
restraining order against the Contemplated Transactions; (c) effect any
necessary registrations and filings; and (d) fulfill the conditions to
Closing within the reasonable control of the parties.
(b) Publicity. No
party or any of its respective Affiliates shall issue any press release or
otherwise make any announcements to the public regarding this Agreement or the
Contemplated Transactions without the prior written consent of GTI and LTS,
which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, except as required
by any applicable Legal Requirements or in connection with GTI’s Shareholders’
Meeting. Unless required by applicable Legal Requirements, each party
and its respective Affiliates shall keep this Agreement and its contents
strictly confidential. The GTI Group Members and Purchaser shall
consult concerning the means by which the employees, customers, suppliers and
others having dealings with Sellers will be informed of the transactions
contemplated hereby, and the GTI Group Members shall use their commercially
reasonable efforts to permit Purchaser to be present for and to speak at
information meetings with the employees of Sellers.
(c) Confidentiality;
Privilege. From and after the date hereof and prior to
Closing, each party shall maintain in confidence, and each party shall cause its
agents, representatives and Affiliates to maintain in confidence, and no party
shall use to the detriment or competitive disadvantage of another party or
Affiliate, any and all Confidential Information exchanged in connection with
this Agreement or the Contemplated Transactions. The foregoing
covenants shall not apply to the extent necessary or appropriate in making any
filing or obtaining any Consent or Legal Approval required for the consummation
of the Contemplated Transactions. After Closing, (i) the GTI Group
Members shall maintain in confidence, and shall not use to the competitive
disadvantage of Purchaser or its Affiliates, any Confidential Information
related to or arising out of the Business and (ii) the LTS Group Members shall
maintain in confidence, and shall not use to the competitive disadvantage of GTI
or its Affiliates, any Confidential Information of GTI and its Affiliates that
is not related to or arising out of the Business, the Purchased Assets or the
Assumed Liabilities.
3.5 Transferred
Employees. Sellers
shall terminate all of their employees effective as of the
Closing. Immediately after the Closing (or prior to, but contingent
upon the Closing), Purchaser shall extend offers of employment to all such
full-time employees of Sellers on such terms and conditions that are, in the
aggregate, substantially similar to the terms and conditions of their positions
prior to the Closing, such that the notice requirements of the WARN Act are not
triggered by the Contemplated Transactions, subject to reasonable and customary
pre-employment screenings, which screenings may commence prior to Closing in
order to facilitate employment by the Purchaser upon Closing. All
such employees that actually accept Purchaser’s offer of employment shall be
referred to herein as the “Transferred
Employees.” Except for those Liabilities and obligations with
respect to the Transferred Employees specifically included in the Assumed
Liabilities, Purchaser shall not assume any Liability for any employment or
benefit related obligations for any employees of Sellers (including the Transferred
Employees) other than COBRA obligations for which Purchaser is liable pursuant
to Code Section 4980B and ERISA Section 602 and the applicable
regulations. The parties agree to utilize, or cause their respective
Affiliates to utilize, the standard procedure set forth in Rev. Proc. 2004-53
with respect to wage reporting. Purchaser shall comply with all
provisions of the WARN Act, if applicable, in the event of a plant closing or
mass layoff after the Closing.
3.6 Further Assurances. Purchaser and the GTI Group Members
agree that, from time to time, at or after Closing, each of them will execute
and deliver such further instruments of conveyance and transfer and take such
other action as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purpose and intent
of this Agreement and to put Purchaser in actual possession and control of the
Purchased Assets. Without limiting the foregoing, if and to the
extent that any Governmental Authorizations of Sellers may not be assigned to
Purchaser hereunder, then Sellers would make commercially reasonable efforts
(but at the expense of Purchaser) to assist Purchaser in obtaining alternative
Governmental Authorizations. Upon transfer of the Governmental Authorizations or
receipt of new Governmental Authorizations, any cash deposits held to secure
such Governmental Authorizations (or related closure bonds) would be released to
Sellers.
3.7 Exclusivity.
(a) Exclusivity;
Superior Proposal. The GTI Group Members shall not and shall
cause their representatives not to, directly or indirectly, and shall use their
respective best efforts to cause their officers, directors, employees, legal
counsel, investment bankers and financial or other advisers not to
(i) solicit, initiate, or encourage any inquiries or proposals regarding
any Acquisition Proposal or (ii) participate in any discussions or
negotiations regarding, or furnish to any person any information in respect of,
or take any other action to facilitate, any Acquisition Proposal or any
inquiries or the making of any proposal that constitutes, or may reasonably be
expected to lead to, any Acquisition Proposal; provided, however, that
nothing contained in this Section 3.7(a) shall prohibit the
Board of Directors of the GTI Group Members from complying with the requirements
of Rule 14e-2(a) under the Exchange Act, if applicable, with respect to an
Acquisition Proposal or any other applicable Legal Requirement or furnishing any
information to, or entering into discussions or negotiations with, any person
that makes an unsolicited bona fide Acquisition Proposal if, and only to the
extent that, (A) the Board of Directors of each GTI Member, after consultation
with outside legal counsel, determines in good faith that the failure to take
such action would be a breach of its fiduciary duties under applicable law and
(B) the Board of Directors of the GTI Group Members determine in good faith that
such Acquisition Proposal may lead to a transaction that would, if consummated,
result in a transaction more favorable to the GTI Group Members’ shareholders
from a financial point of view than the Contemplated Transactions (any such more
favorable Acquisition Proposal, a “Superior
Proposal”). GTI shall notify Purchaser of any Acquisition
Proposal (including the material terms and conditions thereof and the identity
of the person making it) as promptly as practicable after its receipt
thereof. GTI shall keep Purchaser informed of any material changes
(including material amendments) to any such Acquisition Proposal. The
GTI Group Members shall immediately cease and terminate, and shall immediately
cause its Affiliates and their respective officers, directors, employees, legal
counsel, investment bankers and financial or other advisers to cease and
terminate, any existing activities, discussions or negotiations with any parties
conducted heretofore in respect of any possible Acquisition Proposal and shall
demand the immediate return of all confidential information previously provided
to such third parties. Without limiting the foregoing, the GTI
Members understand and agree that any violation of the restrictions set forth in
this Section 3.7(a) by any director or
officer of the GTI Members, or their respective Affiliates, or any financial
advisor, attorney or other representative of any of the foregoing, shall be
deemed a breach of this Section 3.7(a) by the GTI
Members.
(b) No Right to
Withdraw. The Boards of Directors of the GTI Group Members
shall not (i) withdraw or modify, or propose to withdraw or modify, in a
manner adverse to Purchaser, the approval or recommendation by such Boards of
Directors of the Contemplated Transactions, (ii) approve, adopt or
recommend, or propose to approve, adopt or recommend, an Acquisition Proposal,
or (iii) approve or recommend, or propose to approve or recommend, or cause
or permit any the GTI Group Members to enter into, any letter of intent,
agreement in principle, memorandum of understanding, acquisition agreement or
other agreement with respect to an Acquisition Proposal; provided, however, that the
Board of Directors of the GTI Group Members may take such actions if (A) the
Board of Directors of the GTI Group Members, after consultation with outside
legal counsel, determines in good faith that the failure to take any such action
would be a breach of its fiduciary duties under applicable law, (B) the Board of
Directors of the GTI Group Members determine in good faith that the applicable
Acquisition Proposal is a Superior Proposal and (C) prior to taking any such
action, GTI provides four days’ prior written notice to Purchaser of its intent
to take any such action.
3.8 GTI’s
Stockholders’ Meeting; Proxy Statement.
(a) Stockholders’
Meeting. As
soon as practicable following the execution of this Agreement, GTI shall duly
call, give notice of, convene and hold a meeting of GTI’s stockholders for the
purpose of considering resolutions authorizing the Contemplated Transactions
(the “GTI Stockholders’
Meeting”). Unless this Agreement has been terminated pursuant
to Section 2.3, GTI shall hold the GTI
Stockholders’ Meeting regardless of whether there is a Superior
Proposal. Subject to Section 3.7, GTI shall, through its
Board of Directors, in the Proxy Statement (as defined below) state that GTI’s
Board of Directors has approved this Agreement and the Contemplated Transactions
and recommend that all of its stockholders vote in favor of adopting resolutions
authorizing this Agreement and the Contemplated Transactions. Subject
to Section 3.7, GTI will use
commercially reasonable efforts to solicit from its stockholders proxies in
favor of the adoption of resolutions authorizing this Agreement and the
Contemplated Transactions and will take all other action necessary or advisable
to secure the vote or consent of its stockholders in accordance with applicable
Legal Requirements.
(b) Proxy
Statement. As
promptly as practicable following the date of this Agreement (but in any event
within twenty (20) business days thereafter unless the parties shall otherwise
agree), GTI shall prepare (in consultation with LTS) and file with the SEC the
preliminary proxy statement relating to the adoption of resolutions authorizing
the Contemplated Transactions by GTI’s stockholders (as amended or supplemented
from time to time, the “Proxy
Statement”). GTI shall use commercially reasonable efforts to
cause the Proxy Statement to comply with all applicable Legal
Requirements. Each of the GTI Group Members shall use its respective
commercially reasonable efforts to respond as promptly as practicable to any
comments of the SEC with respect to the Proxy Statement, and GTI shall use its
commercially reasonable efforts to cause the definitive Proxy Statement to be
mailed to GTI’s shareholders as promptly as reasonably practicable after the
date of this Agreement. Purchaser makes no representation or warranty
with respect to, and assumes no responsibility for, the Proxy
Statement.
3.9 Internet
Sites. Within
thirty (30) days after Closing, the GTI Group Members shall remove all
information from Internet sites owned or used by them relating to Sellers,
except that for a period of one (1) year, GTI shall include in its Internet
sites a link to the Purchaser’s sites in respect of such names.
3.10 Voting
Agreement. On
the date hereof, Sellers shall deliver to Purchaser a Voting Agreement, in the form of Exhibit I to this Agreement, duly executed by GTI and each director and officer of GTI,
pursuant to which such directors and officers shall covenant and agree to
vote all of the capital stock of GTI held by them in favor of the approval of
this Agreement and of the Contemplated
Transactions.
ARTICLE IV
Representations
and Warranties of
The
GTI Group Members
The GTI Group Members, jointly and severally, represent and warrant
to the LTS Group Members as of the date of this Agreement and as of the
Effective Time, the matters set forth in this Article
IV.
4.1 Organization; Qualification. GTI is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing
under the laws of the State of Delaware. GTIA is a corporation duly
organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of
Iowa. GTMN is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good
standing under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Each GTI Group Member has the
corporate power and authority to operate, own and
lease its properties, perform its obligations under the Contracts to which it is
a party and its Governmental Authorizations,
and to operate the Business. Except as would not reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, each Seller is duly qualified and in
good standing as a foreign corporation and is duly authorized to
transact business in each jurisdiction where the
character of the properties owned or leased by it or the nature of the
activities conducted by it make such qualification and good standing
necessary. All such jurisdictions are identified on Schedule 4.1. Each of GTIA and GTMN is a
wholly owned subsidiary of
GTI.
4.2 Enforceability. This Agreement has been duly executed
and delivered by the GTI Group Members, and, assuming the due
authorization, execution and delivery hereof by the LTS Group Members, constitutes the legal, valid and
binding obligation of such GTI Group Members, and each other agreement
contemplated hereby to be executed by any GTI Group Member, when so executed and
delivered, will be duly executed and delivered by such GTI Group Members
that are parties thereto, and, assuming the due authorization, execution
and delivery thereof by the LTS Group Members, will constitute the legal, valid and
binding obligations of such GTI Group Members, enforceable in each case against them in accordance
with their respective terms, except as may be limited by
bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and other similar laws and
equitable principles related to or limiting creditors’ rights generally and by general principles of equity.
4.3 No Violation of Laws or Agreements;
Legal Approvals; Consents. Except for the Consents identified on
Schedule 4.3, the execution and delivery of this
Agreement and each other agreement contemplated hereby to be
executed by any GTI Group Member and the consummation and compliance with the
Contemplated Transactions by any GTI Group Member shall not, directly or
indirectly (with or without notice or the lapse of time or both),
(a) contravene, conflict
with, result in a breach of, constitute a default or an event of default under
any Contract or
Governmental Authorization to which any GTI Group Member is a party or by which
any of their respective
assets may be bound or affected; or (b) violate, or give any Person the right
to obtain any relief or exercise any remedy under, any Legal Requirement to
which any GTI Group Member is subject, or by which any of their respective assets may be bound
or affected, or give any
Person the right to challenge any of the Contemplated Transactions. Except for the approval of
the Contemplated Transactions by GTI’s stockholders at the
Stockholders’ Meeting (including, without
limitation, the filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “SEC”) of
preliminary and definitive forms of the Proxy Statement, the filing of one or more Current
Reports on Form 8-K with the SEC and such filings as may be required pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the Over-The-Counter-Bulletin-Board (the
“OTC”)) or as described on Schedule 4.3, no GTI Group Member is required to make,
give or obtain any Legal Approvals or Consents in connection with the execution,
delivery or performance by any GTI Group Member of this Agreement and such other
agreements contemplated hereby or the consummation by any GTI Group Member of
the Contemplated Transactions.
4.4 Business;
Assets.
(a) Business. GTIA leases and operates the
Des Moines Facility. GTIA has never conducted any business of any
kind or nature whatsoever other than the Business at the Des Moines
Facility. GTMN
leases and operates the Savage Facility. GTMN has never
conducted any business of
any kind or nature
whatsoever other than the
Business at the Savage Facility. All of the factual information contained
in the second paragraph of
the recitals beginning on
page one of this Agreement is incorporated herein by reference and is true and correct in all
respects.
(b) Assets. All
of the material tangible personal assets used in the Business are owned by
Sellers and are comprised of the assets identified in Sections 1.1(a)(ii) through 1.1(a)(v) and Sections 1.2(a)(ii) through 1.2(a)(v) or are subject to lease
agreements identified on Schedule 4.9, are in good operating
condition and repair, normal wear and tear excepted, are adequate for the uses
to which they are being put and will be, as of the Effective Time, sufficient
for the continued conduct of the Business after the Effective Time in
substantially the same manner as conducted prior to the Effective
Time. Neither GTI nor its Affiliates (other than GTIA and GTMN) owns,
uses or leases any tangible or intangible assets used in the
Business. Neither GTI nor its Affiliates (other than GTIA and GTMN)
owns or possesses any books and records, Governmental Authorizations, or
Contracts related to the Business necessary for the continued conduct of the
Business after the Effective Time in substantially the same manner as conducted
prior to the Effective Time. None of the Purchased Assets is subject
to any Encumbrances of any kind or nature whatsoever, other than Permitted
Encumbrances and the Encumbrances identified on Schedule 4.4(b). All of the
Purchased Assets are located at the locations identified on Schedule 4.14.
(c) Title. Sellers
have good, marketable and exclusive title to, or a valid leasehold or licensee
interest in, all of the Purchased Assets, free and clear of all
Encumbrances and Liabilities other than Permitted Encumbrances and the
Encumbrances identified on Schedule 4.4(b).
(d) Inventory;
Receivables. All of Sellers’ inventory
of crumb rubber included in the Purchased Assets is properly packaged and
saleable at normal profit margins as crumb rubber in the ordinary course of
business. All of Sellers’ inventory of crumb rubber, tire-derived
feedstock, leachate, rims and tubes, scrap steel, scrap wire and culled tires
included in the Purchased Assets can reasonably be expected to be consumed in
the ordinary course of business. All of Sellers’ accounts receivable
arose from bona fide sales by Sellers, are not subject to any counterclaims,
defenses or set-offs, or are otherwise in dispute, and, except to the extent of
the recorded reserve for doubtful accounts specified in the Financial
Statements, all of the accounts receivables are collectible in the ordinary
course of business and will be fully collected without setoff within ninety (90)
days after having been created using commercially reasonable efforts (excluding
litigation and assignment to a collection agency).
(e) Services and
Transition Matters. Schedule 4.4(e) identifies all of the
services provided by GTI and its other Affiliates to Sellers or the
Business. Provided that Purchaser operates the Business with services
similar to those services described on Schedule 4.4(e), there are
no transitional
services of GTI and its other Affiliates that will be necessary for Purchaser to
continue to operate the Business immediately after the Closing Date in the same
manner as it is currently operating.
4.5 Records;
Financial Statements; Indebtedness; EBITDA; Solvency; Public
Filings.
(a) Records. The
books of account and related records of Sellers reflect accurately and in
reasonable detail the Purchased Assets and Assumed Liabilities. The
books of account of Sellers represent actual, bona fide transactions and have
been maintained in accordance with sound business practices, including the
maintenance of adequate internal controls. The minute books of each
Seller for the past three (3) years contain reasonably complete records of all
meetings held of, and corporate action taken by, the Stockholders, the Board of
Directors of such Seller, and committees of the Board of Directors of such
Seller.
(b) Financial
Statements. Exhibit J to this Agreement are the audited
consolidated balance sheets, income statements, and statements of cash flows for
GTI and its subsidiaries at September 30, 2005, September 30, 2006 and
September 30, 2007, and for the fiscal years then ended, together with the
footnotes and the reports thereon of Wolf & Company, P.C. (with respect to
the financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended September 30,
2005 and September 30, 2006) or Schechter, Dokken, Kanter, Andrews & Selcer,
Ltd. (with respect to the financial statements as of and for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2007), and the unaudited segmented financial statements
for Sellers for the same dates and periods reconciled to the audited reports
(such reconciliations being separately disclosed in Exhibit J) (the “Segmented Financial
Statements”), and the unaudited interim balance sheet, income statement,
and statement of cash flows for Sellers at June 30, 2008, and for the period
then ended (collectively, the “Financial
Statements”). The Segmented Financial
Statements: (i) are correct and complete in accordance with the books
of account and records of Sellers; (ii) have been prepared in accordance with
GAAP on a consistent basis throughout the indicated periods, except that the
Segmented Financial Statements contain no footnotes (that, if presented, would
not materially differ from those included in the audited year-end financial
statements referred to above or in the Interim Balance Sheet, as the case may
be) or year-end adjustments (the effect of which will not, individually or in
the aggregate, be materially adverse); and (iii) present fairly the financial
condition, assets and Liabilities and results of operations, and cash flows of
the Business at the dates and for the relevant periods indicated in accordance
with GAAP on a basis consistently applied (except for the
absence of such
footnotes). The 2008 Segmented Financial Statements, when delivered
to LTS will: (i) be correct and complete in accordance with the books of account
and records of Sellers; (ii) have been prepared in accordance with GAAP on a
consistent basis throughout the indicated period (except that the 2008 Segmented
Financial Statements will contain no footnotes that, if presented, would not
materially differ from those included in the 2008 Audited Financial Statements);
and (iii) present fairly the financial condition, assets and Liabilities and
results of operations, and cash flows of the Business at the date and for the
relevant period indicated in accordance with GAAP on a basis consistently
applied (except for the absence of such footnotes). Sellers have also delivered
to Purchaser copies of all letters from GTI’s auditors to the Board of Directors
of GTI or the audit committee thereof applicable to the Business during the
thirty-six (36) months preceding the execution of this Agreement, together with
copies of all responses thereto. All references in this
Agreement to the “Interim
Balance Sheet Date” mean June 30, 2008, and to the “Interim Balance Sheet” mean
balance sheet for the Business dated June 30, 2008 which is Exhibit K to this Agreement. The
Working Capital of Seller at June 30, 2008, as determined by reference to the
Interim Balance Sheet was $2,183,040. The accounting controls of the GTI Group
Members are sufficient to
provide reasonable assurances that (i) all transactions are executed in
accordance with the GTI
Group Members’ management’s general or specific authorization and
(ii) all transactions are recorded as necessary to permit the accurate
preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP.
(c) Guarantees;
Indebtedness. Schedule 4.5(c) identifies all
outstanding guarantees, letters of comfort, letters of assurance, letters of
credit, performance bonds, assurance bonds, surety agreements, indemnity
agreements and any other legally binding forms of assurance or guaranty in
connection with the Business; whether or not issued by GTI, Sellers, a Related
Party or other person (“Third-Party Guaranty
Arrangements”). Schedule 4.5(c) separately discloses
all Indebtedness of Sellers as of June 30, 2008.
(d) Solvency. Neither
Seller is now insolvent and neither Seller will be rendered insolvent by any of
the Contemplated Transactions. As used in this section, “insolvent”
means that the sum of the debts and other probable Liabilities of such Seller
exceed the present fair saleable value of such Seller’s
assets. Immediately after giving effect to the consummation of the
Contemplated Transactions: (i) the GTI Group Members will be
able to pay their Liabilities as they become due in the usual course of their
business; (ii) the GTI Group Members will not have unreasonably small
capital with which to conduct their present or proposed business; and (iii) the
GTI Group Members will have assets (calculated at fair market value) that exceed
their Liabilities. The cash available to the GTI Group Members,
immediately after giving effect to the consummation of the Contemplated
Transactions and after taking into account all uses of such cash currently
anticipated by the GTI Group Members, will be sufficient to pay all obligations
of and judgments against the GTI Group Members promptly in accordance with their
terms.
(e) Public
Filings. GTI has filed all registration statements,
prospectuses, reports, schedules, forms, statements and other documents required
to be filed by it with the SEC and any other Governmental Body by the Securities
Act, the Exchange Act, the rules of the OTC, and all other applicable securities
laws, rules and regulations. All such filings (including, without
limitation, any financial statements or schedules included therein)
(i) were prepared in compliance in all material respects with the
requirements of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act or other applicable laws,
rules and regulations, as the case may be, and (ii) did not at any relevant
time contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements
made therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not
misleading.
4.6 EBITDA. EBITDA
for the Business for the period commencing on October 1, 2007 through
June 30, 2008 is equal to $3,952,870, and Exhibit L to this Agreement is a true and
correct detailed calculation thereof reconciled with the applicable monthly
Financial Statements. Such EBITDA does not include any prepaid
revenues or omit any deferred expenses. Schedule 4.6 discloses any components
of EBITDA attributable to any transactions between any Seller and any Related
Party or allocated to Sellers from GTI or any other Affiliate.
4.7 Undisclosed
Liabilities. Sellers
have no Liabilities except: (a) those reflected or reserved
against on the Interim Balance Sheet in the amounts identified on the Interim
Balance Sheet; (b) those not required under GAAP to be reflected or
reserved against on the Interim Balance Sheet that are expressly quantified and
set forth in the Contracts and Governmental Authorizations (other than for
breach or non-performance); (c) those disclosed on Schedule 4.7; and (d) those of
the same nature as those set forth on the Interim Balance Sheet that have arisen
in the ordinary course of business of Sellers after the Interim Balance Sheet
Date, none of which is materially different in amount than those reflected in
the Financial Statements (“Post-Balance Sheet
Liabilities”). All Post-Balance Sheet Liabilities are
consistent in amount and character with past practice and
experience.
4.8 No
Changes. Since
the Interim Balance Sheet Date, Sellers have conducted the Business only in the
ordinary course, consistent with past practice. Since May 31, 2008,
except as expressly disclosed on Schedule 4.8, there has been
no:
(a) Material
Adverse Effect;
(b) damage
to or destruction of any material Purchased Asset, whether or not covered by
insurance;
(c) strike,
labor union organizing attempts involving Sellers’ employees or the Business
Facilities;
(d) declaration
or payment of any non-cash dividends, other distributions or
redemptions;
(e) change
in any Governing Document of Sellers or in any Seller Plan;
(f) transfer
or assignment of any assets of the Business to any Affiliate of Sellers,
transfer of any assets or Liabilities of any Affiliate of Sellers to the
Business or engagement in any transaction outside the ordinary course of
business or not consistent with past practices;
(g) increase
in the salary, wage or bonus of any employee of a Seller (other than ordinary
course anniversary date raises), or payment of any bonuses to any employee of a
Seller (other than pursuant to Sellers’ Gain Share Plan consistent with past
practice);
(h) asset
acquisition or expenditure, including capital expenditure in excess of $10,000
in the aggregate, other than the purchase of inventory in the ordinary course of
business;
(i) change
in any method of accounting;
(j) payment
to or transaction with any Related Party, which payment or transaction is not
specifically disclosed on Schedule 4.11;
(k) disposition
or transfer of any asset (other than inventory in the ordinary course of
business) for more than $10,000 in the aggregate or for less than fair market
value;
(l) payment,
prepayment or discharge of any Liability other than in the ordinary course of
business, or failure to pay any Liability of more than $10,000 when
due;
(m) write-offs
or write-downs of any assets of Sellers in excess of $10,000 in the
aggregate;
(n) creation
or incurrence of any Indebtedness or Encumbrance other than Permitted
Encumbrances;
(o) termination
or amendment of, or waiver of any material right under, any Contract;
or
(p) agreement
or commitment to do any of the foregoing.
4.9 Contracts;
Compliance.
(a) Contracts. Disclosed on Schedule 4.9 is a list of each
Contract (including all amendments thereto) that: (i) is
material to Sellers, the Business, the other Purchased Assets or Assumed
Liabilities; (ii) involves the purchase, sale or lease of any assets,
materials, supplies, inventory, services or goods in excess of $50,000;
(iii) has an unexpired term of more than six (6) months from the date of
this Agreement, taking into account the effect of any renewal options;
(iv) relates to the borrowing or lending of any money (including
conditional sales agreements), or otherwise evidences Indebtedness;
(v) limits the right of Sellers to compete in any line of business,
restricts the payment of dividends or otherwise restricts any right Seller may
have; (vi) is an employment Contract; (vii) is a contract with a labor
union or other employee representative of a group of employees relating to
wages, hours or other conditions of employment; (viii) is a contract
providing for payments to or by any person based on sales, purchases or profits,
other than direct payments for goods; (ix) is a contract not denominated in
U.S. dollars; (x) is a lease, license, rental, occupancy or conditional
sales agreement; (xi) is a joint venture, partnership or other agreement
involving the sharing of profits, losses, costs or liabilities; (xii) is a
barter or similar agreement; (xiii) is a power of attorney; (xiv) is
an agreement that expressly provides for the undertaking by either Seller for
consequential damages; (xv) is an agreement pursuant to which a Seller has
agreed to indemnify or exonerate any person, including any officer, director or
employee of such Seller with respect to any matter; (xvi) if terminated
would have a Material Adverse Effect; (xvii) is an agreement for the
disposition of any business or product line, or substantial assets of Sellers;
(xviii) is a sales or manufacturer’s representative agreement or
distributor agreement; (xix) is with a Governmental Body (all such
Contracts being separately identified on Schedule 4.9); or (xx) was not
entered into in the ordinary course. True and complete copies of all
Contracts (that are in writing) have been delivered to
Purchaser. Except as described on Schedule 4.3, no Legal Approval or Consent is
needed in order for the Contracts to continue in full force and effect under the
same terms and conditions currently in effect following consummation of the
Contemplated Transactions.
(b) Compliance. Each
Contract is a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Seller party thereto
and is in full force and effect. To the Knowledge of Sellers, each
Contract is a legal, valid and binding obligation of each other party to each
Contract. To the Knowledge of Sellers, no Contract will upon
completion or performance thereof have a Material Adverse
Effect. Sellers and, to the Knowledge of Sellers, each other party to
each Contract have performed all obligations required to be performed by them
under each Contract. Sellers are not in breach or default, and are, to the
Knowledge of Sellers, not alleged to be in breach or default, in any material
respect under any Contract. No event has occurred and no condition or
state of facts exists (or would exist upon the giving of notice or lapse of time
or both) that would become or cause a material breach, default or event of
default under any Contract, would give to any person the right to cause such a
termination or would cause an acceleration of any Liability under any Contract
or create an Encumbrance under any Contract. Neither Seller is
currently renegotiating any Contract. Neither Seller has received any
notice of actual, alleged, possible or potential default, violation,
cancellation, non-renewal or price increase or sales or production allocation
with respect to any Contract. No Contract has been reported, or is
required to be reported under GAAP, in the Financial Statements using the
percentage of completion method of accounting.
4.10 Legal Proceedings; Compliance with Legal
Requirements; Environmental Matters.
Except as disclosed on Schedule 4.10:
(a) Legal
Proceedings. No
Legal Proceeding is pending or, to the Knowledge of any GTI Group Member,
threatened against any GTI Group Member related to the Business or the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement and, to the Knowledge of any GTI
Group Member, there is no basis for any of the foregoing. During the
past three (3) years, no GTI Group Member has been a party to any Legal
Proceeding related to the Business. To the Knowledge of any GTI Group
Member, no event has occurred or circumstance exists that is reasonably likely
to give rise to or serve as a basis for the commencement of any Legal Proceeding
against any GTI Group Member related to the Business.
(b) Compliance
with Legal Requirements. Each Seller is and for the
five (5) years prior to the Effective Time has been in compliance in all
material respects with all Legal Requirements applicable to the
Business. During the past five (5) years, neither Sellers nor any
director, officer, agent, or employee of either Seller, or any other Person
associated with or acting for or on behalf of Sellers, has directly or
indirectly: (a) made any unlawful contribution, gift (other than
isolated and customary gifts of nominal value), bribe, rebate, payoff, influence
payment, kickback, or other payment to any Person, private or public, regardless
of form, whether in money, property, or services (i) to obtain favorable
treatment in securing business, (ii) to pay for favorable treatment for
business secured, (iii) to obtain special concessions or for special
concessions already obtained, for or in respect of a Seller or any Affiliate of
Sellers, or (iv) in material violation of any applicable Legal
Requirements; or (b) established or maintained any fund or asset that has
not been recorded in the books and records of Sellers.
(c) Environmental
Matters. As of the date of this
Agreement:
(i) Each
Seller has operated the Business, including its Leased Real Property (as defined
in Section 4.14), in compliance in all
material respects with all applicable Environmental Laws;
(ii) Sellers
are not subject to any Environmental Liability arising from or in connection
with (A) the operation of the Business by Sellers on or prior to the
Closing, (B) the Sellers’ ownership, operation or use of any Leased Real
Property, or conditions caused by Sellers or, to the Sellers’ Knowledge,
conditions caused by third parties, on or at of any Leased Real Property, or
(C) to Sellers’ Knowledge, any other real property now or formerly owned,
operated or used in connection with the Business by Sellers, in each instance,
based on any facts, circumstances or conditions existing on or prior to the
Effective Time;
(iii) After
the Effective Time no LTS Group Member will suffer or incur any Environmental
Liability as a result of (A) the operation of the Business by Sellers on or
prior to the Closing, (B) the environmental condition of any Leased Real
Property or, to Sellers’ Knowledge, any other real property now or formerly
owned, operated or used in connection with the Business by Sellers, or
(C) the violation by Sellers of any Environmental Laws on or prior to the
Closing, in each such instance, based on any facts, circumstances or conditions
known to Sellers existing on or prior to the Effective
Time;
(iv) Sellers
do not own, lease, use or operate, nor has either Seller ever owned, leased,
used or operated any real property, leasehold, or other real property interest
other than the Leased Real Property;
(v) Sellers
have not treated, stored, recycled or disposed of any Regulated Material on any
part of any of the Leased Real Property except as permitted by and in compliance
with applicable Environmental Laws and permitted by the Governmental
Authorizations disclosed on Schedule 4.12;
(vi) Except
as disclosed on Schedule 4.10, (A) there are no
underground or aboveground storage tanks located on the Leased Real Property,
(B) all such storage tanks and associated piping owned or operated by
Sellers on the Leased Real Property have been maintained, inspected and tested
in compliance with applicable Environmental Laws, (C) all aboveground
storage tanks owned or operated by Sellers on the Leased Real Property are in
sound condition and are not leaking and have not leaked, and (D) to
Sellers’ Knowledge, all underground storage tanks owned or operated by Sellers
on the Leased Real Property are in sound condition and are not leaking and have
not leaked;
(vii) Schedule 4.10 discloses all Off-Site
Locations at which either Seller has in the past two (2) years arranged for the
transportation, recycling, treatment, disposal, or other handling of any
Regulated Material;
(viii) There
is no Regulated Material (A) present at, on or under any Leased Real
Property or in the Environment related to any Leased Real Property which would
require Environmental Remedial Action if known by applicable regulators, or
(B) to Sellers’ Knowledge, present at any other real property or facility
in connection with or as a result of Sellers’ operation of the Business on or
prior to Closing which would require an Environmental Remedial Action or give
rise to an Environmental Liability;
(ix) There
has been no Release of any Regulated Material by Sellers at, on or under the
Leased Real Property or in the Environment related to any Leased Real Property,
except as permitted under and conducted in compliance with applicable
Environmental Laws or the Governmental Authorizations disclosed in Schedule 4.12;
(x) None
of Sellers, or, to Sellers’ Knowledge, any Predecessor of Sellers or the
Business has engaged in any Asbestos Activity or engaged, directed or instructed
any Person to engage in any Asbestos Activity. None of Sellers, or,
to Sellers’ Knowledge, any Predecessor of Sellers or the Business has ever
exposed or permitted any Person to become exposed to asbestos or any products,
assets, materials, supplies or other property containing asbestos;
and
(xi) Sellers
have not received in writing any request for information, notice of claim,
demand or other notification or communication that it is or may be potentially
responsible with respect to any Environmental Liability, Environmental Remedial
Action or any threatened or actual Release of any Regulated
Material.
4.11 Transactions
With Related Parties. Schedule 4.11 describes all assets owned, leased or
used by one or both the
Sellers on the one hand, and any Related Party, on the other hand, applicable to
the Business. Except as otherwise disclosed on Schedule 4.11, Sellers are not, nor has either
Seller, since June 30, 2008 been a party to any other material
transaction, Contract, agreement or understanding with any Related Party (other
than cash distributions) applicable to the Business and Schedule 4.11 separately identifies any
such transaction that was
not at arms’ length. Schedule 4.11 separately describes (a) all intercompany accounts between
Sellers and any Related Party applicable to the Business as of September 30, 2007 and the Interim
Balance Sheet Date,
(b) the crumb rubber supply arrangements
between Sellers and any Related Party during the fiscal year ended September
30, 2007 and the nine-month
period ended June 30, 2008,
and (c) the revenue and expense impact of transactions between Sellers and each such Related
Party related to the Business during such periods.
4.12 Governmental
Authorizations. Schedule 4.12 identifies all
Governmental Authorizations that are necessary to allow the Sellers to conduct
and operate the Business in accordance with all applicable Legal
Requirements. Except for (x) the Waste Tire Facility Permit from the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, (y) the Solid Waste Facility License
from Scott County Community Development Division, Environmental Health
Department and (z) the Permit for
Waste Tire Processing from the State of Iowa, Department of Natural Resources (the
receipt of each being a condition to Purchaser's obligation to proceed with
the Closing), each Governmental Authorization is valid, subsisting and in full
force and effect with respect to each party to which such Governmental
Authorization pertains. Except as disclosed on Schedule 4.12, each Seller is and has
been during the past two (2) years in compliance with all applicable
Governmental Authorizations. Except as disclosed on Schedule 4.12, no Seller has ever
received any written notice of violations from any Governmental Body in respect
of the Business, and none is currently outstanding.
4.13 Taxes. GTI and each
Seller have filed on a timely basis all Tax Returns that are or were required to
be filed by it under applicable Legal Requirements. All such Tax
Returns were correct and complete in accordance with applicable Legal
Requirements. GTI and each Seller has paid all Taxes that were
required to be paid under applicable Legal Requirements, including those shown
due on the Tax Returns filed by it or under any assessment received as an
adjustment to such Tax Returns. No claim has ever been made by a
Taxing authority of a jurisdiction where GTI or either Seller does not file Tax
Returns subject to such claim that GTI and either Seller or either Seller is or
may be subject to Tax in that jurisdiction. GTI and each Seller has
withheld and paid all Taxes required under applicable Legal Requirements to have
been withheld and paid in connection with amounts paid, owing or allocable to
any employee, independent contractor, creditor, stockholder or other
Person. There is no dispute or claim concerning any Tax liability of
GTI or either Seller claimed or raised by any Governmental Body in writing that
has not been resolved. None of GTI or either Seller has waived any
statute of limitations in respect of Taxes or agreed to any extension of time
with respect to a Tax assessment or deficiency that currently remains in
effect. The unpaid Taxes of GTI and Sellers (i) did not, as of
the date of the most-recent Financial Statements, exceed the reserve for Taxes
(rather than any reserve for deferred Taxes established to reflect timing
differences between book and Tax income) set forth on the face of the balance
sheet included in such most-recent the Financial Statements, and (ii) apart
from the proposed Transactions, do not exceed that reserve as adjusted for the
passage of time through the Closing Date in accordance with past custom and
practice of GTI and Sellers in filing their Tax Returns. Neither GTI
nor either Seller has been a member of an affiliated group filing a consolidated
federal income Tax Return (other than the group for which GTI is the common
parent); or has any liability for Taxes of any Person under Treasury Regulations
Section 1.1502-6 (or any similar provision of state, local, or foreign law), as
a transferee or successor, by contract, or otherwise (other than the group for
which GTI is the common parent).
4.14 Leased Real Property. Schedule 4.14 identifies all real
property currently occupied, used or leased by Sellers in connection with the
operation of the Business (such real properties, including buildings,
structures, fixtures, improvements, leaseholds, privileges, rights, easements,
hereditaments, appurtenances and related rights of every nature, collectively,
the “Leased Real
Property”). Sellers lease no real property in connection with
the operation of the Business, other than the Leased Real
Property. Sellers own no real property used in connection with the
operation of the Business. Schedule 4.14 separately identifies
all real property previously owned, used or leased by either Seller or in which
either Seller previously had an interest in connection with the operation of the
Business, within ten (10) years prior to the date of this
Agreement. Schedule 4.14 identifies each lease
agreement, and all amendments and supplements thereto, for each parcel of Leased
Real Property shown as currently leased by Seller on Schedule 4.14 (the “Facility
Leases”). The use and operation of all Leased Real Property by
Sellers conform in all material respects to all applicable building, zoning,
safety and subdivision laws and other Legal Requirements (other than
Environmental Laws) and, to Sellers’ Knowledge, all restrictive covenants and
restrictions and conditions affecting title. Seller has not received
any written or, to Sellers’ Knowledge, oral notice of assessments for public
improvements against any Leased Real Property or any written or, to Sellers’
Knowledge, oral notice or Order by any Governmental Body, insurance company or
board of fire underwriters or other body exercising similar functions
that: (i) relates to violations of building, safety or fire
ordinances or regulations at the Leased Real Property; (ii) claims any
material defect or deficiency with respect to any Leased Real Property; or
(iii) requests the performance of any material repairs, alterations or
other work to or in any Leased Real Property or in any streets bounding the
Leased Real Property. No Seller has received a written notice
of any pending condemnation, expropriation, eminent domain or similar proceeding
affecting all or any
portion of any parcel of Leased Real Property. There are no leases,
subleases, licenses or agreements (including any amendments or modification
thereto) granting any other party the right of use or occupancy of any portion
of the Leased Real Property, and no Seller has granted or
entered into any lease, sublease, license, option, right of first refusal or
other contractual right or similar agreement to purchase, assign or dispose of
the Facility Leases or to allow or grant to any third party the right to use or occupy the Leased Real
Property. Sellers have all certificates of occupancy and Governmental
Authorizations necessary for the current and continued use of the Leased Real
Property and operation of the Business Facilities.
4.15 Employee Benefit Plans. Schedule 4.15 discloses all written and unwritten
material Benefit Plans (grouped by Seller), whether or not funded and whether or
not terminated, (a)
maintained or sponsored by either Seller for the benefit of either Seller,
(b) with respect to which
either Seller has or may reasonably be expected to have Liability which could
reasonably be expected to result in a material Liability of Purchaser or
is obligated to contribute which Liability could reasonably be expected to
result in a material Liability of Purchaser, (c) that otherwise covers any of the
current or former employees
of either Seller or their beneficiaries, or (d) as to which any current or former
employees of either Seller or their beneficiaries participated or were entitled
to participate or accrue or have accrued any rights (each, a “Seller
Plan”). Each Seller Plan and all
related trusts, insurance contracts and funds have been created, maintained,
funded and administered in material compliance with all applicable Legal
Requirements and in material compliance with the underlying or applicable plan
document, trust agreement, insurance policy or other
writing.
4.16 Labor Relations. No
employee of either Seller is represented by a union or other labor organization,
and no GTI Group Member has Knowledge of any union organizing
activities. Schedule 4.16 discloses all written
employment agreements with any employees of either Seller (grouped by
Seller). Schedule 4.16 contains a complete and
accurate list of the following for each employee or director of each Seller
(grouped by Seller), including each employee on leave of absence or layoff
status: employer; name; job title; current compensation paid or
payable and any change in compensation since January 1, 2008; vacation accrued
through a date no more than fifteen (15) days prior to the date of this
Agreement; and service credited for purposes of vesting and eligibility to
participate under any Seller Plan. To Sellers’ Knowledge, no employee of either Seller is a party
to, or is otherwise bound by, any agreement or arrangement, including any
confidentiality, noncompetition, or proprietary rights agreement with any other
Person that in any way adversely affects or will adversely affect (a) the performance of his or her duties as
an employee of either Seller, or (b) the ability of either Seller to conduct
the Business as it is presently conducted. All severance expenses or liabilities that
may become payable to any Transferred Employee as a result of the
Contemplated Transactions
or the transfer of such Transferred Employee from either Seller to LTS or
Purchaser are disclosed on Schedule 4.16.
4.17 Insurance. Schedule 4.17 discloses all insurance policies
(grouped by Seller) with respect to which either Seller is the owner, insured or
beneficiary. Each Seller has paid all premiums due under each
such insurance policy in accordance with its existing payment terms and will not
have any Liability after the Effective Time for retrospective or retroactive
premium adjustments or other experienced-based liability, other than for normal policy year-end
audits. Schedule 4.17 contains a summary of the loss
experience under each liability policy of each Seller for the past 12
months. Schedule 4.17 discloses the manner in which each
Seller provides coverage for workers’ compensation.
4.18 Certain Business Facility
Matters. All
factual representations made by any GTI Group Member to any Governmental Body in
the applications for any Governmental Authorization related to or required to
operate the Business Facilities and the Business and all related correspondence
and filings with such Governmental Bodies are incorporated herein by reference
and were true and correct in all material respects when submitted, and nothing
has occurred since their submission that would have any adverse affect on such
Governmental Authorizations. To the Sellers’ Knowledge, all
municipal, county or other local approvals granted to either Seller and the
Governmental Authorizations related thereto were properly issued in accordance
with all applicable Legal Requirements. Sellers and GTI have created
and maintained all records required by its Governmental Authorizations and any
related Legal Requirements, and all such records have been provided to
Purchaser. All requirements, if any, found in the Governmental
Authorizations related to the Business Facilities and/or the Business have been
satisfied by Sellers and GTI with respect to requirements in connection with
such Governmental Authorizations. All plans, reports and renewals
required by any of such Governmental Authorizations or any related Legal
Requirements have been properly prepared and timely submitted to the appropriate
Governmental Body. All requirements or obligations imposed on Sellers
by municipal, county or other authority, including but not limited to those
concerning the payment of fees and compliance with Environmental Laws, have been
timely satisfied and are otherwise current. No notice of violation of
any Environmental Law is outstanding with respect to any Business
Facility.
4.19 Customers. Schedule 4.19 separately identifies all
customers that have transacted Business with the Sellers during the nine-month
period ended June 30, 2008. There exists no condition or state of facts or
circumstances involving the Sellers’ customers, suppliers, distributors or sales
representatives that any GTI Group Member can reasonably foresee could adversely
affect the Business or the Purchased Assets after the Effective
Time. Except as disclosed on Schedule 4.19, no customer or
distributor has during the past year informed any GTI Group Member of an
intention to cease doing business with either Seller, refused to honor a
purchase commitment or advised any GTI Group Member that it may cease doing
business with either Seller, or that it may reduce the volume of business that
it does with either Seller. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no
representation or warranty is given with respect to whether any such customer,
supplier, distributor or sales representative will continue to do business with
the Purchaser after the Effective Time.
4.20 Brokers. No
broker, investment banker, financial advisor or other Person is entitled to any
broker’s, finder’s, financial advisor’s or other similar fee or commission in
connection with the Transactions based upon arrangements made by or on behalf of
any GTI Group Member.
ARTICLE V
Representations
and Warranties of The LTS Group Members
The LTS
Group Members jointly and severally represent and warrant to the GTI Group
Members, as of the date of this Agreement and as of the Effective Time, the
matters set forth in this Article V.
5.1 Organization. Each LTS Group Member is a limited
liability company duly organized and validly existing and in good standing under
the laws of the State of Delaware. Each LTS Group Member has the
limited liability company
power and authority to operate, own and lease its
properties. As
of the Closing Date, Purchaser shall be duly qualified and in good standing as
a foreign limited liability company and is duly authorized to transact business
in the State of Iowa and
the State of Minnesota.
5.2 Enforceability. This Agreement has been duly executed
and delivered by each LTS Group Member, and, assuming the due
authorization, execution and delivery hereof by the GTI Group Members, constitutes the legal, valid and
binding obligations of such
LTS Group Members, and each other agreement contemplated hereby to be executed
by any LTS Group Member, when so executed and delivered, will be duly executed
and delivered by such LTS Group Members that are parties thereto, and,
assuming the due authorization, execution and delivery thereof by the GTI Group
Members, will constitute the
legal, valid and binding obligations of such LTS Group Members, enforceable in
each case against them in accordance with their respective terms except as may be limited by bankruptcy,
insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and other similar laws and equitable
principles related to or limiting creditors’ rights generally and by general
principles of equity.
5.3 No
Violation of Laws or Agreements; Legal Approvals; Consents. The execution and delivery of this
Agreement and each other agreement contemplated hereby to be executed by any LTS
Group Member and the consummation and compliance with the Contemplated
Transactions by any LTS Group Member shall not, directly or indirectly (with or
without notice or the lapse of time or both), (a) contravene, conflict with,
result in a breach of, constitute a default or an event of default under any
Contract or Governmental Authorization to which any LTS Group Member is a party or by which any of their
respective assets may be bound or affected; or (b) violate, or give any Person
the right to obtain any relief or exercise any remedy under, any Legal
Requirement to which any LTS Group Member is subject, or by which any of their respective assets may be
bound or affected, or give any Person the right to challenge any of the
Contemplated Transactions. Except for the approval of its
Board of Managers, which has been received, and the consent of Comerica Bank,
which will be received at or prior to Closing (if necessary), no LTS Group
Member is required to make, give or obtain any
Legal Approvals or Consents in connection with the execution, delivery or
performance by any of the LTS Group Members of this Agreement and
such other agreements
contemplated hereby or the consummation by any of the LTS Group Members of the
Contemplated Transactions.
5.4 Brokers. No
broker, investment banker, financial advisor or other Person is entitled to any
broker’s, finder’s, financial advisor’s or other similar fee or commission in
connection with the Transactions based upon arrangements made by or on behalf of
any LTS Group Member.
5.5 Legal Proceedings. No Legal Proceeding is
pending or, to the knowledge of any LTS Group Member, threatened against any of
the LTS Group Members related to the lawfulness of the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement.
ARTICLE VI
Indemnification
6.1 Survival;
Indemnity.
(a) Survival. All representations,
warranties, covenants and obligations made by any party in this Agreement are
several and independent legal obligations and, subject to the limitations set
forth in Section
6.1(e), shall survive the Closing.
(b) Indemnification
by GTI Group Members. Except as provided in Section 2.3, the GTI Group Members shall
jointly and severally, indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless each LTS Group
Member, its Affiliates, and their members, officers, directors, employees, and
agents (the “LTS Indemnified
Parties”) from and against, and shall reimburse the LTS Indemnified
Parties for, all Damages (collectively, “LTS Damages”) directly or
indirectly asserted against, imposed upon, resulting to, or incurred or required
to be paid by any LTS Indemnified Party arising out of or in connection
with: (i) any breach or inaccuracy of any representation or warranty
made by any GTI Group Member in this Agreement, in any exhibits or schedules
hereto, or in any certificate or document delivered by any GTI Group Member at
the Closing; (ii) any breach or nonperformance of any covenant or
obligation made by any GTI Group Member in this Agreement or in any other
agreement contemplated hereby; (iii) any Retained Liabilities; and (iv) any
obligation under the Warn Act or similar state Legal Requirement caused by any
action of Sellers prior to the Closing.
(c) Indemnification
by LTS Group Members. The LTS Group
Members shall jointly and severally indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless
each GTI Group Member, its Affiliates, and their stockholders, officers,
directors, employees, and agents (the “GTI Indemnified Parties”) from
and against, and shall reimburse the GTI Indemnified Parties for, all Damages
(collectively, “GTI
Damages”) directly or indirectly asserted against, imposed upon,
resulting to, or incurred or required to be paid by any GTI Indemnified Party
arising out of or in connection with: (i) any breach or inaccuracy of any
representation or warranty made by any LTS Group Member in this Agreement, in
any exhibits or schedules hereto, or in any certificate or document delivered by
any LTS Group Member at the Closing; (ii) any breach or nonperformance of any
covenant or obligation made by any LTS Group Member in this Agreement or in any
other agreement contemplated hereby; (iii) any Assumed Liabilities; and (iv) any
obligation under the Warn Act or similar state Legal Requirement caused by any
action of Purchaser on or following the Closing.
(d) Indemnification
Threshold and Ceiling. Notwithstanding the foregoing
provisions in this Section 6.1, (i) no GTI Group Member
shall have any indemnification obligations for breaches of representations and
warranties under Section 6.1(b)(i) except
to the extent that the amount of all claims for Damages exceeds $50,000 in the
aggregate (the “Threshold”), and then the GTI
Group Members shall be liable only for Damages in excess of the Threshold; (ii)
the aggregate liability of the GTI Group Members for breaches of representations
and warranties under Section 6.1(b)(i) shall
not exceed an amount equal to five percent (5%) of the Purchase Price (the
“Ceiling Amount”); (iii)
no LTS Group Member shall have any indemnification obligations for breaches of
representations and warranties under Section 6.1(c)(i) except to
the extent that the amount of all claims for Damages in the aggregate exceeds
the Threshold, and then the LTS Group Members shall be liable only for Damages
in excess of the Threshold; and (iv) the LTS Group Members’ obligations to
indemnify the GTI Indemnified Parties under Section 6.1(c)(i) shall not
exceed an amount equal to the Ceiling Amount.
(e) Time
Period. Except
as otherwise provided in this Section 6.1(e), all representations,
warranties, covenants and obligations made by any party in this Agreement shall
survive the Effective Time without limitation. Any claim for LTS
Damages sustained by reason of a breach or inaccuracy of any representation or
warranty relating to those matters governed by Sections 4.1 (Organization), 4.2 (Enforceability), 4.3 (No Violation) and 4.4(c) (Title) shall be
unlimited with respect time. Any claim for LTS Damages sustained by reason of a
breach or inaccuracy of any representation or warranty relating to those matters
governed by Section
4.13 (Taxes)
shall be limited to LTS Damages claimed in a written notice delivered to GTI
prior to the date ninety (90) days after the expiration of the applicable
federal and state statutes of limitations related to such
matters. Any other claim for LTS Damages or GTI Damages sustained by
reason of a breach or inaccuracy of any representation or warranty as provided
under Article IV and
Article V of this
Agreement shall be limited to LTS Damages or GTI Damages, as applicable, claimed
in a written notice delivered to the Indemnifying Party (as defined below)
within twelve (12) months after the Effective Time (the “Survival
Period”).
(f) GTI Restricted
Cash. During the Survival Period, GTI shall maintain in cash
or cash equivalents an amount equal to the Ceiling Amount minus the amount of the
Holdback that has not (at that time) been distributed to Purchaser pursuant to
Sections 1.3 and/or 6.1 of this
Agreement.
(g) Indemnification
Procedure. In the event that any claim is asserted
or threatened against any party entitled to indemnification under this Agreement
(the “Indemnified
Party”), such Indemnified Party shall send
prompt written notice to
the party obligated to indemnify such Indemnified Party (the “Indemnifying
Party”); provided, that the failure to deliver written
notice of any claim to the Indemnifying Party shall not relieve the Indemnifying
Party of any liability to the Indemnified Party under this Section 6.1 with respect to such claim unless the
Indemnifying Party’s ability to defend such claim has been
materially adversely affected or prejudiced as a result of such
failure. Upon
receipt of written notice of any claim against the Indemnified Party, the
Indemnifying Party shall have the right to assume the defense of such claim at
its sole cost and expense. The Indemnified Party shall have the right
to participate in and, if desired by the Indemnified Party, at its sole
cost and expense, retain separate legal counsel. In the event that
the Indemnifying Party does not accept the defense of any claim, an Indemnified
Party shall have the full right to defend against any such claim and shall be entitled to settle or agree
to pay in full such claim, and the Indemnifying Party will be bound by any
determination made in such third-party claim or any compromise or settlement
effected by the Indemnified Party. In addition, the
Indemnifying Party shall not enter into any
settlement or compromise, or consent to the entry of any judgment, with respect
to any claim against an Indemnified Party without obtaining the prior written
consent of such Indemnified Party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, unless the
Indemnified Party would not incur any additional costs, expenses or liabilities
as a result of such settlement, compromise or judgment. In all events
and circumstances, the Indemnifying Party and each Indemnified Party shall cooperate in the defense of
any claim subject to this Section 6.1, and the records of each such party
shall, if any applicable attorney-client privilege is not affected, be available
to each such other Party
with respect to any such defense.
(h) Exceptions. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, if an Indemnified Party determines in good faith that there is a
reasonable probability that a third-party claim may adversely affect it or its
Related Parties (including claims for Environmental Liability that could
adversely affect the operations of the Business and claims that could adversely
affect the customer base of the Business), the Indemnified Party may, by notice
to the Indemnifying Party, assume the exclusive right to defend, compromise or
settle such third-party claim, but the Indemnifying Party will not be bound by
any determination of any third-party claim so defended for the purposes of this
Agreement or any compromise or settlement effected without its consent (which
may not be unreasonably withheld or delayed).
(i) Payment. Upon determination by
agreement of the parties or by final nonappealable arbitration award pursuant to
Section 7.5 that a party is entitled to indemnification under this
Section 6.1, the Indemnifying Party shall promptly
pay or reimburse, as appropriate, the Indemnified Party for any Damages to which
the Indemnified Party is entitled to be indemnified under this Section 6.1. The Indemnified Party is
entitled to indemnification of any fees, costs and expenses, including
reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by the Indemnified Party
in connection with enforcement of its right to
indemnification pursuant to this Section 6.1. The LTS Indemnified Parties are entitled to offset, setoff or recoup
from the Indemnification Holdback against obligations of the GTI Group Members to indemnify the LTS
Indemnified Parties for LTS Damages under this Section 6.1.
ARTICLE VII
Miscellaneous
7.1 Costs and Expenses. Subject to Section 1.4(h) and Section 3.2(a), and the remainder of this Section 7.1, each party shall bear all costs
and expenses of its own legal and other professional advisors in connection with
this Agreement and the Contemplated Transactions. Sellers shall be
responsible for the costs and expenses of either (i) real estate title
commitments and policies or (ii) survey costs and appraisal expenses, whichever
is determined by the parties to be less expensive as of the Closing Date; and
Purchaser shall be responsible for the costs and expenses referred to in either
clause (i) or (ii) above, whichever is determined by the parties to be more
expensive as of the Closing Date. All accrued expenses associated
with any Leased Real Property included in the Purchased Assets, such as
electricity, gas, water, sewer, telephone, security services and similar items,
shall be prorated between Purchaser and Sellers as of the Closing
Date. Purchasers and Sellers shall settle such amounts within
forty-five (45) days after the Closing.
7.2 Agents. GTI is hereby appointed by Sellers as
Sellers’ agent and attorney-in-fact to act for
Sellers in any and all manner hereunder, and LTS Group Members may rely
exclusively on GTI for any
action it takes on behalf of Sellers. LTS is hereby appointed by Purchaser as
Purchaser’s agent and attorney-in-fact to act for
Purchaser in any and all manner hereunder, and GTI Group Members may rely
exclusively on LTS for any action it takes on behalf of
Purchaser.
7.3 Notices. All notices given or made in connection
with this Agreement shall be in writing. Delivery of written notices
shall be effective upon receipt. All deliveries shall be made to the
following addresses:
(a) if to LTS or the Purchaser, to:
Liberty
Tire Services, LLC
Dominion
Tower, Suite 3100
625
Liberty Avenue
Pittsburgh,
PA 15222
Telephone: 412-562-0148
Facsimile: 412-562-0248
Attn: Jeffrey
D. Kendall and General Counsel
E-mail: JKendall@LibertyTire.com
With a copy (which shall not constitute
notice) to:
K&L
Gates LLP
Henry W.
Oliver Building
535
Smithfield Street
Pittsburgh,
PA 15222
Attn: David
L. Forney, Esq.
Telephone: 412-355-6330
Facsimile: 412-355-6501
E-mail: David.Forney@klgates.com
(b) if to GTI or Sellers,
to:
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
7 Kimball
Lane, Building A
Lynnfield,
MA 01940
Attn: Charles
E. Coppa, CFO
Telephone: 781-224-2411
Facsimile: 781-224-0114
E-mail: Coppagmt@aol.com
With a copy (which shall not constitute
notice)
to:
Morse,
Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
Reservoir
Place
1601
Trapelo Road
Waltham,
MA 02451
Attn: Carl
Barnes, Esq.
Telephone: 781-622-5930
Facsimile: 781-622-5933
E-mail: cbarnes@mbbp.com
or, at such other address as any of the
parties shall have furnished in writing to the other
parties hereto.
7.4 Setoff; Assignment. Purchaser
shall be entitled to offset, setoff or recoup from any amounts due by Purchaser
to Sellers under this Agreement (including the Holdback) or under any other
agreement contemplated hereby against any obligation of the GTI Group Members to
Purchaser under this Agreement or under any other agreement contemplated
hereby. This Agreement
and all the rights and powers granted by this Agreement shall bind and inure to
the benefit of the parties
and their respective successors and permitted assigns. This Agreement
and the rights, interests and obligations under this Agreement may not be
assigned by any party (by operation of law or otherwise) except that Purchaser may assign this
Agreement and its rights
and interests hereunder, in
whole or in part to LTS or to any of its Affiliates or as collateral security or in
connection with a sale of the Business. No such assignment shall
reduce any obligation of an LTS Group Member to any GTI Group Member or any obligation of a
GTI Group Member to any LTS Group Member. Any purported assignment in
violation of the provisions hereof shall be null and void and without
effect. Neither this Agreement nor any other agreement contemplated
hereby shall be deemed to confer upon any person not a party hereto or thereto
any rights or remedies hereunder or thereunder.
7.5 Dispute Resolution. The
parties shall cooperate in good faith to resolve any dispute that may arise
under the Contemplated Transactions; provided, that if any party
believes such dispute cannot be resolved by mutual agreement, then such dispute
shall be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the Streamlined Arbitration
Rules and Procedures (the “Rules”)of the American
Arbitration Association. Any such arbitration shall be conducted in
Wilmington, Delaware or such other place as is mutually acceptable to Sellers
and Purchaser by one arbitrator mutually acceptable to the parties involved in
such arbitration or, if such parties are unable to agree on an arbitrator, the
arbitrator shall be appointed in accordance with the rules of the American
Arbitration Association. The decision and award of any such
arbitrator (which may include specific performance and injunctive relief) shall
be made in writing, and shall be final and valid, nonappealable, binding upon
the parties involved in such arbitration, and enforceable by any such party in
any court of competent jurisdiction. Notwithstanding any provision of
this Agreement or the Rules to the contrary, no party will be eligible to
receive, and the arbitrator shall not have the authority to award, exemplary,
punitive, incidental, indirect or consequential damages (except with respect to
claims for indemnification of LTS Damages or GTI Damages resulting from
third-party claims for such Damages), and the arbitrator shall not have the
authority to amend this Agreement. In the event that any dispute regarding
the Contemplated Transactions is resolved by arbitration pursuant to this
Section 7.5, the prevailing party shall be entitled
to recover from the non-prevailing party (or parties) the fees, costs and
expenses (including, but not limited to, the reasonable fees and expenses of
counsel) incurred by the
prevailing party in connection with such action.
7.6 Consideration; Recitals; Governing
Law. The
parties acknowledge the mutual receipt and sufficiency of valuable consideration
for the formation of the legally binding contract represented by this
Agreement. The consideration for this Agreement includes the mutual
exchange of promises as well as all of the representations, warranties,
covenants and obligations contained in this Agreement and the other agreements
identified herein and therein being executed simultaneously with this
Agreement. The recitals beginning on page one of this Agreement are
incorporated into this Agreement and made a part of this
Agreement. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to its
conflict of laws doctrines.
7.7 Jurisdiction;
Service of Process. Any
action or proceeding seeking to enforce any arbitration award made pursuant to
Section 7.5 and any
action or proceeding seeking injunctive relief or seeking to compel specific
performance of any provision of this Agreement or of any other agreement
contemplated hereby may be brought against any party in the courts of (i) the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, County of Allegheny, or, if it has or can acquire
jurisdiction, in the United States District Court for the Western District of
Pennsylvania and (ii) the State of Minnesota, Counties of Hennepin and Ramsey
or, if it has or can acquire jurisdiction, in the United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota. Subject to the foregoing limitations,
each party consents to the jurisdiction of these courts (and of the appropriate
appellate courts) in any such action or proceeding and waives any objection to
convenience of forum or venue laid in such courts. Process in any
action or proceeding referred to in the first sentence of this Section 7.7 may be served on any
party anywhere in the world. Each party agrees that, except as
expressly set forth in the first sentence of this Section 7.7, the arbitration
procedures set forth in Section 7.5 shall be the
exclusive means for resolving disputes among any of the LTS Group Members and
any of the GTI Group Members, and no party, or any of its Affiliates, shall
commence any action or proceeding against any other party or any of its
Affiliates in any court in any jurisdiction. The parties agree that any one or
all of them may file a copy of this Section with any court as written evidence
of the knowing, voluntary and bargained agreement among the parties irrevocably
to waive any objections to venue or to convenience of forum and to irrevocably
select arbitration pursuant to Section 7.5 as the exclusive
means for resolving disputes.
7.8 Entire
Agreement; Severability; Cumulative Effect; Counterparts. This Agreement, together with the
exhibits and schedules hereto, sets forth a complete and exclusive statement of
the promises, covenants, agreements, conditions and undertakings among the
parties with respect to the
subject matter of this Agreement. This Agreement and the other
agreements contemplated hereby supersede all prior or contemporaneous agreements
and understandings, negotiations, inducements or conditions, express or implied,
oral or written, among the
parties, including that certain letter agreement dated as of July 1, 2008 by and
between LTS and the GTI Group Members, but excluding the Escrow Agreement dated
as of July 8, 2008, by and among LTS, GTI and BNY Mellon, National
Association, which shall survive the execution of this Agreement in accordance
with its terms. If any term or other provision of this
Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid,
illegal or incapable of being enforced by any rule of law or public policy, all other terms, provisions and
conditions of this Agreement shall nevertheless remain in full force and
effect. Upon such determination that any term or other provision is
invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced, the parties hereto
shall negotiate in good faith to modify this
Agreement so as to effect the original intent of the parties as closely as
possible to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law in an acceptable
manner to the end that the Contemplated Transactions are fulfilled to the extent
possible. The rights and remedies of the parties expressly set
forth in Article VI and
this Article VII are
the sole statement of the rights and remedies of the parties and exclude all
other rights and remedies they otherwise might have now or hereafter at law, in
equity, by statute or otherwise; provided, however, that such
rights and remedies expressly set forth in Article VI and this Article VII are cumulative,
and the exercise by a party of any one remedy available under such Articles will
not preclude the exercise of any other such remedy. This Agreement may be executed in
counterparts (each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which
taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement) and shall become
effective when one or more
counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other
parties.
7.9 Exhibits
and Schedules. All
exhibits and schedules identified herein shall be included in a letter of
exhibits and schedules delivered by GTI to LTS and accepted by LTS on and as of
the date of this Agreement.
7.10 Amendments;
Waivers. This
Agreement may be amended, modified or waived only by an instrument in writing
executed by LTS (which instrument shall be binding on the LTS Group Members) and
GTI (which instrument shall be binding on the GTI Group Members). No waiver by
any party of any default or breach by another party of any representation,
warranty, covenant or condition contained in this Agreement, any exhibit or any
document, instrument or certificate contemplated hereby shall be deemed to be a
waiver of any subsequent default or breach by such party of the same or any
other representation, warranty, covenant or condition. No act, delay,
omission or course of dealing on the part of any party in exercising any right,
power or remedy under this Agreement shall operate as a waiver thereof or
otherwise prejudice any of such party’s rights, powers and
remedies.
[Remainder of this page intentionally
left blank]
The parties, each intending to
be legally bound by this
Agreement, have executed this Agreement as of the first date identified in the
first sentence to this Agreement.
LIBERTY
TIRE SERVICES, LLC
BY: /s/Jeffrey D. Kendall
NAME: Jeffrey
D. Kendall
TITLE: CEO
LIBERTY
TIRE SERVICES OF OHIO, LLC
BY: /s/Jeffrey D. Kendall
NAME: Jeffrey
D. Kendall
TITLE: CEO
GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
BY: /s/Lyle Jensen
NAME: Lyle
Jensen
TITLE: CEO
GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES OF
MINNESOTA,
INC.
BY: /s/Lyle Jensen
NAME: Lyle
Jensen
TITLE: Vice
President
GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES OF
IOWA,
INC.
BY: /s/Lyle Jensen
NAME: Lyle
Jensen
TITLE: Vice
President
Signature Page – GreenMan Asset Pu rchase Agreement
Table
of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
ARTICLE
I The Sale and Purchase Transactions
|
1
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
The
GTIA Transaction
|
1
|
1.2
|
The
GTMN Transaction
|
7
|
1.3
|
Purchase
Price.
|
12
|
1.4
|
Working
Capital Adjustment and EBITDA True-Up.
|
15
|
1.5
|
Separate
Transactions.
|
18
|
1.6
|
Certain
Consents.
|
18
|
|
|
ARTICLE
II Closing; Conditions to Closing; Termination
|
18
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
Closing;
Effective Time
|
18
|
2.2
|
Certain
Conditions to Close; Closing Deliveries.
|
19
|
2.3
|
Termination
Prior to the Effective Time.
|
23
|
|
|
ARTICLE
III Certain Covenants
|
24
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
Restrictive
Covenants.
|
24
|
3.2
|
Certain
Tax and Other Matters
|
26
|
3.3
|
Covenants
Prior to the Effective Time.
|
27
|
3.4
|
Fulfillment
of Conditions and Agreements Prior to Closing; Legal Approvals;
Consents
|
28
|
3.5
|
Transferred
Employees
|
29
|
3.6
|
Further
Assurances
|
30
|
3.7
|
Exclusivity.
|
30
|
3.8
|
GTI’s
Stockholders’ Meeting; Proxy Statement
|
31
|
3.9
|
Internet
Sites
|
32
|
3.10
|
Voting
Agreement
|
32
|
|
|
ARTICLE
IV Representations and Warranties of The GTI Group Members
|
32
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
Organization;
Qualification
|
32
|
4.2
|
Enforceability
|
32
|
4.3
|
No
Violation of Laws or Agreements; Legal Approvals; Consents
|
33
|
4.4
|
Business;
Assets.
|
33
|
4.5
|
Records;
Financial Statements; Indebtedness; EBITDA; Solvency; Public
Filings.
|
34
|
4.6
|
EBITDA
|
36
|
4.7
|
Undisclosed
Liabilities
|
36
|
4.8
|
No
Changes
|
36
|
4.9
|
Contracts;
Compliance.
|
37
|
4.10
|
Legal
Proceedings; Compliance with Legal Requirements; Environmental
Matters
|
38
|
4.11
|
Transactions
With Related Parties
|
40
|
4.12
|
Governmental
Authorizations
|
40
|
4.13
|
Taxes
|
41
|
4.14
|
Leased
Real Property
|
41
|
4.15
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
42
|
4.16
|
Labor
Relations
|
42
|
4.17
|
Insurance
|
42
|
4.18
|
Certain
Business Facility Matters
|
43
|
4.19
|
Customers
|
43
|
4.20
|
Brokers
|
43
|
|
|
ARTICLE
V Representations and Warranties of The LTS Group Members
|
44
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
Organization
|
44
|
5.2
|
Enforceability
|
44
|
5.3
|
No
Violation of Laws or Agreements; Legal Approvals; Consents
|
44
|
5.4
|
Brokers
|
44
|
5.5
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
45
|
|
|
ARTICLE
VI Indemnification
|
45
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
Survival;
Indemnity.
|
45
|
|
|
ARTICLE
VII Miscellaneous
|
47
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
Costs
and Expenses
|
47
|
7.2
|
Agents
|
47
|
7.3
|
Notices
|
48
|
7.4
|
Setoff;
Assignment
|
49
|
7.5
|
Dispute
Resolution
|
49
|
7.6
|
Consideration;
Recitals; Governing Law
|
49
|
7.7
|
Jurisdiction;
Service of Process
|
50
|
7.8
|
Entire
Agreement; Severability; Cumulative Effect; Counterparts
|
50
|
7.9
|
Exhibits
and Schedules
|
51
|
7.10
|
Amendments;
Waivers
|
51
|
Index of
Exhibits and Schedules
|
Addendum
|
Certain
Definitions
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit A
|
Closing Date Certificate
Example
|
|
Exhibit B
|
Form of Maust Employment
Agreement
|
|
Exhibit C
|
Form of Sublease Agreement (Iowa
Parcel I)
|
|
Exhibit D
|
Form of Real Property Lease (Iowa
Parcels G & H)
|
|
Exhibit E
|
Form of Real Property Lease
(Minnesota Location)
|
|
Exhibit F
|
Form of Supply
Agreement
|
|
Exhibit G
|
Form of Transition Services
Agreement
|
|
Exhibit H
|
Form of Trade Name
License
|
|
Exhibit I
|
Form of Voting
Agreement
|
|
Exhibit J
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
Exhibit K
|
Interim Balance
Sheet
|
|
Exhibit L
|
EBITDA Calculation
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule 1.1(a)(ii)
|
GTIA’s Tangible Personal
Property
|
|
Schedule 1.1(a)(iv)
|
GTIA’s Computer
Equipment
|
|
Schedule 1.1(a)(vii)
|
GTIA’s
Contracts
|
|
Schedule 1.1(a)(viii)
|
GTIA’s Governmental
Authorizations
|
|
Schedule 1.1(a)(x)
|
GTIA’s Personal Property
Leases
|
|
Schedule 1.1(c)
|
Assumed Indebtedness of
GTIA
|
|
Schedule 1.1(f)
|
Allocation of GTIA Purchase
Price
|
|
Schedule 1.2(a)(ii)
|
GTMN’s Tangible Personal
Property
|
|
Schedule 1.2(a)(iv)
|
GTMN’s Computer
Equipment
|
|
Schedule 1.2(a)(vii)
|
GTMN’s
Contracts
|
|
Schedule 1.2(a)(viii)
|
GTMN’s Governmental
Authorizations
|
|
Schedule 1.2(a)(x)
|
GTMN’s Personal Property
Leases
|
|
Schedule 1.2(c)
|
Assumed Indebtedness of
GTMN
|
|
Schedule 1.2(f)
|
Allocation of GTMN Purchase
Price
|
|
Schedule 2.2(a)(v)
|
Certain Consents as Condition to
Close
|
|
Schedule 4.1
|
Organization;
Title
|
|
Schedule 4.3
|
Sellers’ Consents; Legal
Approvals
|
|
Schedule 4.4(b)
|
Encumbrances; Permitted
Encumbrances
|
|
Schedule 4.4(e)
|
Services and Transition
Matters
|
|
Schedule 4.5(c)
|
Guarantees;
Indebtedness
|
|
Schedule 4.6
|
EBITDA
|
|
Schedule 4.7
|
Undisclosed
Liabilities
|
|
Schedule 4.8
|
No
Changes
|
|
Schedule 4.9
|
Sellers’
Contracts
|
|
Schedule 4.10
|
Sellers’ Legal Proceedings; Environmental
Matters
|
|
Schedule 4.11
|
Related Party
Transactions
|
|
Schedule 4.12
|
Governmental
Authorizations
|
|
Schedule 4.14
|
Leased Real
Property
|
|
Schedule 4.15
|
Seller Employee Benefit
Plans
|
|
Schedule 4.16
|
Employees
|
|
Schedule 4.17
|
Insurance
|
|
Schedule 4.19
|
Customers
|
Addendum
Certain Definitions
“Acquisition
Proposal” means an inquiry,
offer or proposal by any person (other than Purchaser or its Affiliates) to
acquire directly or indirectly all or any material portion of the assets
of GTI or of the Sellers, the Business or any of the capital stock of GTI or of
the Sellers, whether by merger, consolidation, business combination or
otherwise.
“Affiliate” means, with respect to any Person, any
other Person that, directly
or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by,
or is under common control with such Person. “Control” for this purpose means the possession,
directly or indirectly, of more than fifty percent of the voting power of a
Person.
“Agreement” refers to this Asset Purchase
Agreement, as amended from time to time.
“Asbestos Activity” means any
possession, purchase, sale, brokering, owning, leasing, using, manufacturing,
fabricating, controlling, handling, installing, encapsulating, disposing of,
remediating or transporting any asbestos or any products, assets, materials,
supplies or other property (including personal property and real property)
containing asbestos.
“Benefit
Plan” means any “employee benefit plan” within the meaning of Section 3(3) of
ERISA, and any other written or unwritten profit sharing, pension, savings,
deferred compensation, fringe benefit, insurance, medical, medical
reimbursement, life, disability, accident, post-retirement health or welfare benefit, stock option, stock
purchase, sick pay, vacation, employment, severance, termination or other plan,
agreement, Contract, policy, trust fund or arrangement for the benefit of
employees employed by Sellers.
“CERCLA” means the Comprehensive
Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. § 9601
et seq., as
amended.
“Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended.
“Confidential Information”
means all of the following disclosed or exchanged between any LTS Group
Member and any GTI Group Member in connection with the Contemplated Transactions
and all of the following owned or possessed by Sellers: (i) all information that is
a trade secret under applicable trade secret or other law; (ii) all information concerning
product specifications, data, know-how, formulae, compositions, processes,
designs, sketches, photographs, graphs, drawings, samples, inventions and ideas,
past, current and planned research and development, current and planned
manufacturing or distribution methods and processes, customers, customer lists,
current and anticipated customer requirements, price lists, market studies,
business plans, computer hardware, software and computer software and database
technologies, systems, structures and architectures; (iii) all information concerning
the business and affairs of the disclosing party (which includes historical and
current financial statements, financial projections and budgets, tax returns and
accountants’ materials, historical, current and projected sales, capital
spending budgets and plans, business plans, strategic plans, marketing and
advertising plans, publications, client and customer lists and files, contracts,
the names and backgrounds of key personnel and personnel training techniques and
materials, however documented), and all information obtained from review of the
disclosing party’s documents or property or discussions with the disclosing
party regardless of the form of the communication; (iv) all proprietary information
of Sellers; and (v) all
notes, analyses, compilations, studies, summaries and other material prepared by
the receiving party to the extent containing or based, in whole or in part, upon
any information included in the foregoing. “Confidential Information”
shall not include any information (x) that was already known to a party prior to
its disclosure to such party by another party to this Agreement, (y) that is
known to others not bound by a duty of confidentiality, and (z) that is (or
becomes) publicly available through no fault of such party.
“Consent” means any registration, filing, declaration, application,
right of first refusal or notice to or with any Person and any consent,
approval, permit, qualification, waiver, waiting period, authorization, or
action of or by any Person other than a Governmental
Body. “Consent” shall include any consent, approval,
waiver, authorization or other action required under any Contract or to prevent
any assets or Liabilities of Sellers from being in default, terminating,
accelerating, revoking, suspending, canceling, losing or diminishing in value, changing in any respect or
creating any Liability or giving any Person any rights or remedies as a result
of the consummation of the Contemplated Transactions.
“Contemplated Transactions”
means the sale and purchase of the Purchased Assets and the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement and each other agreement contemplated
hereby.
“Contract” means any agreement,
contract, lease (relating to real or personal property), license, indenture,
mortgage, instrument, commitment, purchase or sale orders, consensual
obligation, promise or obligation or other arrangement or understanding, oral or
written, formal or informal, express or implied, whether or not legally binding,
to which a Seller is a party or by which it or its assets may be
affected.
“Damages” means any loss, demand,
claim, allegation, assertion, action or cause of action, assessment, damage,
deficiency, Liability, cost, expense, fine, penalty, judgment, award or
settlement, whether or not involving a third-party claim, including reasonable
legal fees, interest, and any reasonable amounts paid in investigation, defense
or settlement of any of the foregoing; provided, however, that
Damages shall in each case be calculated net of the amount of any Tax benefit
reasonably expected to be realized within the next three fiscal years and the
amount of insurance proceeds and indemnity and contribution and other direct
tangible monetary benefits actually recovered by the such party from any third
party.
“Encumbrance” means any debt, mortgage,
deed of trust, community or marital property interest, equitable interest,
pledge, security interest, encumbrance, option, right of first option or
refusal, agreement of sale, adverse claim, easement, lien, lease, assessment,
restrictive covenant, Liability, encroachment, right-of-way, servitude,
restriction on use or any other burden, charge or restriction of any kind or
nature whatsoever, legal or equitable, or any item similar or related to the
foregoing.
“Environment” means soil, land, surface or
subsurface strata, surface
waters (including navigable waters, ocean waters, streams, ponds, drainage
basins, and wetlands), groundwaters, drinking water supply, stream sediments,
ambient air (including indoor air), plant and animal life, and any other
environmental medium or natural
resource.
“Environmental
Laws” means all Legal
Requirements that relate to protection of the environment, natural resources, or
public or employee health and safety, or relating to the production, generation,
use, storage, treatment, processing, transportation, disposal or Release of
Regulated Materials, including any Occupational Safety and Health Law, common
law trespass, nuisance, property damage and similar common law
theories.
“Environmental
Liabilities” means any Damage or other
Liability imposed upon or arising under any Environmental Law, including those
consisting of or relating to any: (i) duty imposed by, breach of
or noncompliance with any Environmental Law; (ii) environmental, health or
safety matters or conditions (including on-site or off-site contamination,
occupational safety and health and regulation of Regulated Materials); (iii) Environmental Remedial
Action undertaken by any person required by applicable Environmental Law; (iv) bodily injury (including
illness, disability and death, and regardless of when any such bodily injury
occurred, was incurred, or manifested itself), property damage (including
trespass, nuisance, wrongful eviction, and deprivation of the use of real or
personal property), or other Damage of any other person (including any employee
or former employee of such person); (v) any injury to, destruction
of, or loss of natural resources, or costs of any natural resource damage
assessments; (vi)
Hazardous Activity conducted by any person; (vii) the presence or Release of
any Regulated Material at or on any property; and (viii) any Existing
Environmental Condition.
“Environmental
Remedial Action” means any and all actions
required to (i)
investigate, clean up, remediate, remove, treat, contain or in any other way
address any Regulated Materials in the Environment; (ii) prevent the Release or
threat of Release or minimize the further Release of Regulated Materials so they
do not migrate or endanger public health or welfare or the indoor or outdoor
Environment; and (iii)
perform pre-remedial studies and investigations and post-remedial monitoring,
maintenance and care. The term “Environmental Remedial Action”
includes any action which constitutes a “removal”, “remedial action” or
“response” as defined by Section 101 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §9601(23), (24),
and (25).
“ERISA” means the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder.
“Existing Environmental
Condition” means any Release of a Regulated Material or the presence of a
Regulated Material on or in environmental media at any property (including the
presence in surface water, groundwater, soils or subsurface strata, or air),
other than the presence of a Regulated Material in locations and at
concentrations that are naturally occurring, existing prior to or as of the
Closing Date at any Leased Real Property or Facilities that are part of the
Purchased Assets, including the subsequent migration of any Regulated Materials
comprising such an environmental condition.
“Facility” means any real
property, leasehold, or other real property interest currently or formerly
owned, leased, controlled, used or operated by Sellers or any Predecessor
(including the Leased Real Property) and any building, plant, structure or
equipment (including motor vehicles, tank cars, and rolling stock) currently or
formerly owned, leased, used or operated by Sellers.
“Governmental
Authorization” means any permit,
certificate, license, franchise, privilege, approval, registration and
authorization required under, or otherwise made available by or under the
authority of, any applicable Legal Requirement that is applicable to Sellers,
the Purchased Assets or the Business or otherwise advisable in connection with,
applicable to, or affecting the operation of or use in the
Business.
“Governmental
Body” means any nation, state,
county, city, town,
borough, village, district or other jurisdiction, court, tribunal, government,
quasi-governmental authority of any nature, department, commission, board,
bureau, agency, official or other regulatory, administrative or governmental
authority or instrumentality (foreign, federal,
state, local or other political subdivision) or any body similar or related to
the foregoing.
“Hazardous
Activity” means the distribution,
generation, handling, importing, management, manufacturing, processing,
production, refinement, Release, storage, transfer, transportation, treatment or
use (including any withdrawal or other use of groundwater) of Regulated
Materials in, on, under, about, or from any Facility or any part of any Facility
into the Environment, and any other act, business, operation, or thing that
increases the danger, or risk of danger, or poses a risk of harm to persons or
property on or off any Facility, or that may adversely affect the value of any
Facility.
“Indebtedness” shall mean as to any Person
(i) all obligations
of such Person for borrowed money; (ii) all obligations of
such Person evidenced by notes, bonds (including surety or performance bonds)
debentures or similar instruments; (iii) all obligations to pay the
deferred purchase price of property, including obligations under any installment
sale agreement, deferred purchase price, or earnout payment in connection with
any business acquired (regardless of whether such acquisitions were of stock or
assets or were pursuant to a merger or reorganization or other similar
transaction); (iv) all
obligations for equipment or personal property leases, real property leases and
other arrangements that under GAAP must be capitalized or are in the nature of
financing devices; and (v)
any and all interest, fees, prepayment penalties or other payments with respect
to any of the foregoing in clauses (i) through (iv).
“Knowledge” An individual will be
deemed to have knowledge of a particular fact or other matter
if: (i) that individual is
actually aware of that fact or matter; or (ii) a prudent individual
could be expected to discover or otherwise become aware of that fact or matter
in the course of conducting a reasonable investigation; provided, however, that
no such individual shall be required to consult any docket or public records or
make any inquiry of any unrelated third parties. Knowledge with respect to Sellers or the
GTI Group Members shall mean the Knowledge of Lyle Jensen,
Charles Coppa and Mark Maust.
“Legal
Approval” means any registration, filing,
declaration, application, rights of first refusal or notice to or with any
Person and any consent, approval, permit, qualification, waiver, waiting period,
authorization, Order or action of or by any Governmental Body. “Legal
Approval” shall include any consent, approval,
waiver, authorization or other action required under any Contract or
Governmental Authorization or to prevent any assets or Liabilities of Sellers
from being in default, terminating, accelerating, revoking, suspending, canceling, losing or
diminishing in value, changing in any respect or creating any Liability or
giving any Person any rights or remedies as a result of the consummation of the
Contemplated Transactions.
“Legal
Proceeding” means any action, arbitration, audit, hearing,
investigation, litigation or suit (whether civil, criminal, administrative,
investigative, or informal, public or private) or Order commenced, brought,
conducted, or heard by or before, or otherwise involving, any
Governmental Body or
arbitrator.
“Legal
Requirement” means any applicable
international, multinational, national, foreign, federal, state, municipal,
local (or other political subdivision) or administrative law, constitution,
statute, code, ordinance, rule (including stock exchange rules), regulation,
requirement, standard, policy or guidance having the force of law, treaty,
judgment or Order of any kind or nature whatsoever including any judgment or
principle of common law.
“Liability” with respect to any Person
or any property of such Person, means any and all debt, liability or obligation
of such Person of any nature, kind, character or description whatsoever, whether
or not due or to become due, known or unknown, accrued, unaccrued, fixed,
absolute, matured, liquidated, asserted, conditional, secondary, potential,
determined, determinable or contingent, executory, liquidated or unliquidated,
secured or unsecured, joint or several, vested or unvested and whether or not
incurred directly by such Person or by any predecessor of such Person, whether
or not required to be accrued on the financial statements of such Person and
whether or not arising out of any act, omission, transaction, circumstance, sale
of goods or service, setoff, recoupment, counterclaim or otherwise.
“Occupational Safety
and Health Law” means any Legal Requirement designed to
provide safe and healthful working conditions and to reduce occupational safety
and health hazards, and any program, whether governmental or private (including
those promulgated or
sponsored by industry associations and insurance companies), designed to provide
safe and healthful working conditions.
“Off-Site Location” means any
location other than the Leased Real Property.
“Order” means any order, award, decision,
injunction, judgment,
ruling, writ, assessment, decree, determination, subpoena, stipulation or
verdict entered, issued, made, or rendered by any court, administrative agency,
or other Governmental Body or by any arbitrator.
“Permitted
Encumbrance” means (i) any encumbrance
for taxes, assessments or governmental charges or claims that are not yet
delinquent, and (ii) in the case of the Leased Real Property, non-monetary
charges and encumbrances of record that do not (either individually or in the
aggregate) interfere with or detract from the use, marketability or value of the
Leased Real Property.
“Person” means and includes a natural person, a
corporation, an association, a partnership, a limited liability company, a
trust, a joint venture, an unincorporated organization, a business, a Governmental Body or any
other legal entity.
“Predecessor” means any Person that is a predecessor
entity or entities to Sellers by any legal means, including, without limitation,
(i) pursuant to any Legal Requirement, whether by statutory merger, de facto merger, consolidation,
combination, division, dissolution, reorganization or otherwise or (ii) based on
any theory or doctrine of successor liability, whether by statute or at common
law.
“Regulated
Material” ” means any (i) hazardous substance as
defined by any Environmental Law, (ii) any petroleum or petroleum
product, oil or waste oil; (iii) any asbestos or
polychlorinated biphenyls; (iv) any hazardous material,
toxic substance, toxic pollutant, solid waste, municipal waste, industrial
waste, hazardous waste, flammable material, radioactive material, pollutant or
contaminant or words of similar meaning and regulatory effect under any
applicable Environmental Law; and (v) any other chemical,
material, or substance exposure to which or whose discharge, emission, disposal
or Release is prohibited, limited, or regulated under any applicable
Environmental Law. “Regulated
Material” includes any mixture or solution of the foregoing, and all
derivatives or synthetic substitutes of the foregoing.
“Related
Party” means (i) GTI, (ii) any Affiliate
(other than Sellers) of any
GTI Group Member, (iii) any officer, director, partner, executor or trustee (or
similar capacity) of any Person identified in clauses (i) or (ii) preceding,
(iv) any spouse, sibling, ancestor, lineal descendant of or person who
resides with any natural person identified
in any one of the preceding clauses and any Affiliate of any such person, and
(v) any Person with respect to whom any natural person identified in any one of
the preceding is an officer, director, partner, executor or trustee (or similar capacity) and any
Affiliate of any such person.
“Release” means any spill, leak,
emission, discharge, deposit, disposal, escape, leach, dump or other release of
any Regulated Material into the Environment, whether intentional or
unintentional, including the abandonment or discarding of barrels, containers
and other receptacles containing any Regulated Material.
“Security
Right” means, with respect to any security, any
option, warrant, subscription right, preemptive right, right to convert or exchange, other right, proxy,
put, call, demand, plan, commitment, agreement, understanding or arrangement of
any kind relating to such security, whether issued or unissued, or any other
security convertible into or exchangeable for any such security. “Security Right” includes convertible or exchangeable
debt or equity securities and any right relating to issuance, sale, assignment,
transfer, purchase, redemption, conversion, exchange, registration or voting and
includes rights conferred by statute, by the issuer’s governing or organic documents or by
Contract.
“Tax” means any income, gross
receipts, license, payroll, employment, excise, severance, stamp, occupation,
premium, property, environmental, windfall profit, customs, vehicle, airplane,
boat, vessel or other title or registration, capital stock, franchise, employee
or other withholding, foreign or domestic withholding, social security,
unemployment, disability, real property, personal property, sales, use,
transfer, value added, alternative, add-on minimum or other tax, fee,
assessment, levy, tariff, charge or duty of any kind whatsoever and any
interest, penalty, addition or additional amount thereon imposed, assessed or
collected by or under the authority of any Governmental Body or payable under
any tax-sharing agreement or other contract, whether disputed or not, and
including any obligation to indemnify or otherwise assume or succeed to the Tax
liability of any other person or payable under any tax-sharing agreement or any
other contract.
“Tax
Return” means any return (including any
information return), report, statement, schedule, notice, form, declaration,
claim for refund or other document or information filed with or submitted to, or
required to be filed with or submitted to, any Governmental Body in connection with the
determination, assessment, collection or payment of any Tax or in connection
with the administration, implementation or enforcement of or compliance with any
Legal Requirement relating to any Tax.
“Treasury
Regulations” means the final and temporary regulations
promulgated under the Code.
“WARN Act” means the Worker
Adjustment Retraining and Notification Act of 1988, as amended.
APPENDIX B
OPINION OF BCC ADVISERS &
COMPANY
Exhibit
B
September
10, 2008
Board
of Directors
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Attn:
Lyle Jensen
12498
Wyoming Ave. South
Savage,
MN 55378
Dear
Members of the Board of Directors:
It is
our understanding that Liberty Tire Services, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (“LTS”); Liberty Tire Services of Ohio, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of LTS (“Purchaser”) GreenMan
Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“GTI”); GreenMan Technologies of
Iowa, Inc., an Iowa corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of GTI (“GTIA”); and
GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota, Inc., a Minnesota corporation and wholly
owned subsidiary of GTI (“GTMN” and, together with GTIA, “Sellers”) have
entered into a proposed Asset Purchase Agreement (the
“Agreement”). Sellers operate their businesses of tire collection,
disposal, shredding, processing, recycling and sale of used tires, including
without limitation the production of tire derived fuel chips, tire derived
mulch, tire shreds, crumb rubber and other tire derived feedstock, located
primarily in Iowa and Minnesota (collectively, the
“Business”). Pursuant to the Agreement, Purchaser will acquire from
the Sellers substantially all assets related to or used in connection with the
Business in exchange for cash in an amount equal to (i) five dollars ($5.00) for
each dollar of EBITDA of the Business for the twelve (12) month period
commencing on October 1, 2007 and ending on September 30, 2008, plus (ii) the assumption of
the Assumed Liabilities, minus (iii) all
outstanding indebtedness of the Business if and to the extent included in the
Assumed Liabilities (such net amount, the “Purchase Price”), adjusted by the Working
Capital Adjustment and subject to the EBITDA True-Up in accordance with the
Agreement, (the “Transaction”).
You
have requested that BCC Advisers (“BCC”) provide an opinion (the “Opinion”) as
to the fairness from a financial point of view of the consideration to be
received by Sellers from the Purchaser.
Board
of Directors, GreenMan Technologies, Inc.
September
10, 2008
Page
2
BCC, as
part of its investment banking services, is regularly engaged in the valuation
of businesses and securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions and for
other corporate and/or personal purposes. BCC has not previously been
engaged by GTI or its subsidiaries to provide opinions of value for the shares
of GTI common stock. BCC has no financial interest in any of the
parties to the Transaction nor acts as an employee or agent of any of the
parties to the Transaction and neither has, nor has had, any financial or other
dealing with any of the parties to the Transaction that would prejudice its
ability to render a fair and impartial opinion relating to the adequacy and
fairness of the consideration to be received by the Sellers in the
Transaction. BCC will receive a fee for rendering this Opinion, which
fee is not contingent upon the successful completion of the Transaction or the
conclusions set forth in the Opinion. In addition, GTI has agreed to
reimburse certain of our expenses and indemnify us for certain liabilities
arising out of our engagement.
In
connection with this Opinion, we have made such reviews, analyses, and inquiries
as we have deemed necessary and appropriate under the circumstances and, to the
best of our knowledge, have substantially complied with the requirements set
forth in FINRA Rule 2290 relating to the issuance of fairness
opinions. Among other things, we have:
1.
|
Reviewed
financial and other information related to the Sellers that was publicly
available, including the Sellers’ annual reports (10Ks) for the years
ended September 30, 2003 through 2007 and quarterly reports (Form 10-Q)
for nine-month periods ended June 30, 2007 and
2008.
|
2.
|
Reviewed
unaudited financial statements pertaining to the Sellers’ operations
prepared by Sellers for the ten months ended July 31, 2008, which Sellers’
management identified as being the most current financial statements
available.
|
3.
|
Considered
information provided during discussions with Sellers’ management through
the closing of the transaction.
|
4.
|
Reviewed
the draft Asset Purchase Agreement, dated September 5,
2008.
|
5.
|
Spoken
with certain members of the management of Sellers and Purchaser regarding
the operations, financial condition, future prospects, and projected
operations and performance of
Sellers.
|
6.
|
Visited
the GTMN manufacturing plant in Savage,
MN.
|
7.
|
Reviewed
financial forecasts and projections prepared by Sellers’ management for
the years ended September 30, 2009 through
2012.
|
8.
|
Compared
certain financial data of Sellers with various other companies whose
securities are traded in public markets, reviewed prices paid in certain
other business combinations and conducted such other financial studies,
analyses and investigations as we deemed appropriate for purposes of this
Opinion.
|
Board
of Directors, GreenMan Technologies, Inc.
September
10, 2008
Page
3
In
rendering this Opinion, we have relied upon and assumed the accuracy and
completeness of all the financial and other information that was available to us
from public sources, that was provided to us by Sellers or their
representatives, or that was otherwise reviewed by us. We have relied
on representations that the financial projections supplied to us have been
reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently available estimates
and judgments of Sellers’ management as to the future operating and financial
performance of Sellers. We have not assumed any responsibility for
making an independent evaluation of any assets or liabilities or for making any
independent verification of any of the information reviewed by us. We
have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that there have
been no material changes in the assets, liabilities, financial condition,
results of operations, or prospects of Sellers since the date of the most recent
financial statements provided to us, and that there is no information nor are
there any facts that would make any of the information reviewed by us incomplete
or misleading. Furthermore, we have undertaken no independent
analysis of any potential or actual litigation, regulatory action, possible
unasserted claims, or other contingent liabilities to which Sellers may be
subject.
We have
relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that (a) the
representations and warranties of all parties to the Agreement and all other
related documents and instruments that are referred to therein are true and
correct, (b) each party to all such agreements will fully and timely perform all
of the covenants and agreements required to be performed by such party, (c) all
conditions to the consummation of the Transaction will be satisfied without
waiver thereof, and (d) the Transaction will be consummated in a timely manner
in accordance with the terms described in the Agreement provided to us, without
any amendments or modifications thereto. We have also relied upon and
assumed, without verification, that (i) the Transaction will be consummated in a
manner that complies in all respects with all applicable federal and state
statutes, rules and regulations, and (ii) all governmental, regulatory, and
other consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of the Transaction
will be obtained and that no delay, limitations, restrictions or conditions will
be imposed or amendments, modifications or waivers made that would result in the
disposition of any material portion of the assets of GTI or Sellers, or
otherwise have an adverse effect on GTI or Sellers or any expected benefits of
the Transaction. In addition, we have relied upon and assumed,
without independent verification, that the terms of the final form of the
Agreement will not differ in any material respect from those reflected in the
draft of the Agreement identified in item 4 above or otherwise described to us
by representatives of GTI or Sellers.
Board
of Directors, GreenMan Technologies, Inc.
September
10, 2008
Page
4
We did
not (a) initiate any discussions with, or solicit any indications from, third
parties with respect to the Transaction or any alternatives to the Transaction,
(b) negotiate the terms of the Transaction, or (c) advise the Board of Directors
or any other party with respect to alternatives to the Transaction.
This
Opinion is furnished for the use and benefit of the Board of Directors in
connection with its consideration of the Transaction and is not intended to be
used, and may not be used, for any other purpose without BCC’s prior written
consent. This Opinion should not be construed as creating any
fiduciary duty on BCC’s part to any party. This Opinion is not
intended to be, and does not constitute, a recommendation to the Board of
Directors, any security holder or any other person as to whether to enter into
the Transaction or how to act or vote with respect to any matter relating to the
Transaction.
Our
Opinion is necessarily based on economic, market, financial and other conditions
as they exist on, and on the information made available to us as of the date of
this Opinion. It should be understood that, although subsequent
developments may affect this Opinion, we have no obligation to update, revise or
reaffirm this Opinion. Our Opinion does not address the relative
merits of the Transaction contemplated by the Agreement and the other business
strategies being considered by GTI’s Board of Directors, nor does it address the
decision to proceed with the Transaction contemplated by the
Agreement. Our Opinion does not constitute a recommendation to the
Board thereof as to whether it is advisable to enter into the Agreement or as to
the consideration the Purchaser should pay for their interest in the
Sellers.
Based
upon the foregoing and such other factors as we deem relevant, we are of the
opinion that the aggregate consideration to be paid by LTS pursuant to the
Agreement is adequate consideration and that the Transaction is fair to the
shareholders of GTI from a financial point of view.
BCC
ADVISERS
/s/ Alan D. Ryerson
Alan D.
Ryerson, CPA/ABV, ASA
Senior
Vice President
/s/ Gregory L. Weber
Gregory
L. Weber, CPA/ABV, ASA
Senior
Vice President
APPENDIX C
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
INFORMATION
REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB contains forward-looking statements
regarding
future events and the future results of GreenMan Technologies, Inc.
within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995,
and
are based on
current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections and the
beliefs and
assumptions of our management. Words such as "expect,"
"anticipate,"
"target,"
"goal," "project," "intend," "plan," "believe," "seek," "estimate,"
"will,"
"likely," "may," "designed," "would," "future," "can," "could" and
other
similar
expressions that are predictions of or indicate future events and
trends
or which do
not relate to historical matters are intended to identify such
forward-looking
statements. These statements are based on management's current
expectations
and beliefs and involve a number of risks, uncertainties, and
assumptions
that are difficult to predict; consequently actual results may
differ
materially from those projected, anticipated, or implied.
PART
I
Item 1.
Description of Business
General
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries "we", "us" or
"our") was
originally founded in 1992 and has been operated as a Delaware
corporation
since 1995. Today, we comprise two operating locations that
collect,
process and
market scrap tires in whole, shredded or granular form. We are
headquartered
in Savage, Minnesota and currently operate tire processing
operations in
Iowa and Minnesota.
Our
tire processing operations are paid a fee to collect, transport and
process scrap
tires (i.e., collection/processing revenue) in whole or two inch
or smaller
rubber chips which are then sold (i.e., product revenue).
Recent
Developments
On
October 1, 2007 we acquired Welch Products, Inc., a company
headquartered
in Carlisle, Iowa that specializes in design, product development,
and
manufacturing of environmentally responsible products using
recycled
materials,
primarily recycled rubber. Welch's patented products and processes
include
playground safety tiles, roadside anti-vegetation products,
construction
molds and
highway guard-rail rubber spacer blocks. Through its recent
acquisition of
Playtribe, Inc., Welch Products also provides innovative
playground
design, equipment and installation. Welch Products has been one of
our crumb
rubber customers for the past several years. The transaction was
structured as
a share exchange in which 100 percent of Welch Products' common
stock was
exchanged for 8 million shares of our common stock, valued at
$2,800,000.
In
connection with the restructuring of our credit facility with
Laurus
Master Fund,
Ltd. in 2006, we issued Laurus a warrant to purchase up to an
aggregate of
3,586,429 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to
$0.01 per
share. On January 25, 2007 we filed a registration statement under
the
Securities Act
of 1933 relating to those shares as well as 553,997 shares
issuable to
another shareholder upon exercise of a warrant. The registration
statement was
declared effective on February 6, 2007. During the period of June
through August
2007, Laurus acquired 1,154,098 shares of our common stock upon
the partial
exercise of its warrant on a cashless basis.
Products and
Services
Our
tire processing operations are paid a fee to collect, transport and
process scrap
tires (i.e., collection/processing revenue) in whole or two inch
or smaller
rubber chips which are then sold (i.e., product revenue).
We
collect scrap tires from three sources:
o local,
regional and national tire stores;
o tire
manufacturing plants; and
o illegal
tire piles being cleaned-up by state, county and local
governmental
entities.
The
tires we collect are processed and sold:
o as
tire-derived fuel used in lieu of coal by pulp and paper
producers,
cement kilns and electric utilities;
o as
a substitute for crushed stone in civil engineering applications
such
as road beds, landfill construction or septic field
construction;
or
o as
crumb rubber (rubber granules) and used for playground and
athletic
surfaces, running tracks, landscaping/groundcover
applications
and bullet containment systems.
Manufacturing/Processing
Our
tire shredding operations currently have the capacity to process
about
15 million
passenger tire equivalents annually. Our continuing operations
collected
approximately 12.8 million passenger tire equivalents in the fiscal
year ended
September 30, 2007 compared to approximately 12.1 million passenger
tire
equivalents during the year ended September 30, 2006.
The
method used to process tires is a series of commercially available
shredders that
sequentially reduce tires from whole tires to two-inch chips or
smaller.
Bead-steel is removed magnetically, yielding a "95% wire-free
chip."
This primary
recycling process recovers approximately 60% of the incoming tire.
The remaining
balance consists of un-saleable cross-contaminated rubber and
steel ("waste
wire"), which we have historically disposed of at significant
annual costs.
Our Iowa and Minnesota facilities further process the waste wire
residual into
saleable components of rubber and steel, which reduces residual
disposal costs
and provides additional sources of revenue. In our Iowa facility,
rubber is
further granulated into particles less than one-quarter inch in
size
for use in the
rapidly expanding athletic surfaces and playground markets served
by Welch
Products.
Raw
Materials
We
believe we will have access to a supply of tires sufficient to meet
our
requirements
for the foreseeable future. According to the 2007 Scrap Tire and
Rubber User's
Directory, in 2006 approximately 300 million passenger tire
equivalents
(approximately one per person per year) were discarded in the
United
States
(referred to as "current generation scrap tires") in addition to an
estimated
several hundred million scrap passenger tire equivalents already
stockpiled in
illegal tire piles. Additionally, approximately 237 million
passenger tire
equivalents are currently recycled, of which approximately 133
million are
burned as tire-derived fuel; 46 million are used in civil
engineering
applications; and 58 million are used in various other applications
such as crumb
rubber production, retreading and export. The approximately 63
million
remaining passenger tire equivalents are now added to landfills
annually.
Based on this and other data, there appears to be an adequate
supply
of tires to
meet our needs.
Customers
Our
customers continue to consist of major tire manufacturers, local
and
regional tire
outlets, and state and local governments. We have many long-term,
stable
relationships with our customers and we do not believe that the loss
of
any individual
customer would have a material adverse effect on our business.
During 2007
and 2006, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of our
total net
sales.
We
do not have any long-term contracts which require any customer to
purchase any
minimum amount of products or provide any minimum amount of tires.
There can be
no assurance that we will continue to receive orders of the same
magnitude as
in the past from existing customers or that we will be able to
market our
current or proposed products to new customers.
Sales and
Marketing
We
continue to utilize in-house sales staff for securing new accounts
and
marketing
processed materials. This strategy maximizes revenue and
concentrates
our
sales/marketing efforts on highly focused initiatives.
Sales/marketing
personnel have
extensive experience in the tire recycling industry and in
industries
where our processed materials are consumed.
Competition
We
compete in a highly fragmented and decentralized market with a
large
number of
small competitors. Although we continue to believe there is an
opportunity
for industry consolidation, we have focused our attention on
strategic
value-added vertical integration such as the acquisition of Welch
Products. Our
strategy is to continue to increase the number of passenger tire
equivalents
that we processes through aggressive sales and marketing efforts as
well as
continuing to focus on identifying and generating new marketing
strategies for
recycled tires and their value added by-products.
Government
Regulation
Our
tire recycling and processing activities are subject to extensive
and
rigorous
government regulation designed to protect the environment. We do
not
believe that
our activities result in emission of air pollutants, disposal of
combustion
residues, or storage of hazardous substances except in compliance
with
applicable permits and standards. The establishment and operation of
plants
for tire
recycling, however, are subject to obtaining numerous permits and
compliance
with environmental and other government regulations. The process of
obtaining
required regulatory approvals can be lengthy and expensive. The
Environmental
Protection Agency and comparable state and local regulatory
agencies
actively enforce environmental regulations and conduct periodic
inspections to
determine compliance with government regulations. Failure to
comply with
applicable regulatory requirements can result in, among other
things, fines,
suspensions of approvals, seizure or recall of products,
operating
restrictions, and criminal prosecutions. Furthermore, changes in
existing
regulations or adoption of new regulations could impose costly new
procedures for
compliance, or prevent us from obtaining, or affect the timing
of, regulatory
approvals. We use our best efforts to keep abreast of changed or
new
regulations for immediate implementation.
Protection of
Intellectual Property Rights and Proprietary Rights
None
of the equipment or machinery that we currently use or intend to
use
in our current
or proposed manufacturing activities is proprietary. Any
competitor can
acquire equivalent equipment and machinery on the open market.
We
have used the name "GreenMan" in interstate commerce since
inception
and assert a
common law right in and to that name.
Employees
As
of September 30, 2007, we had 77 full time employees. We are not a
party to any
collective bargaining agreements and consider the relationship with
our employees
to be satisfactory.
Item 2.
Description of Properties
Our
Minnesota location consists of production facilities and office
space
situated on
approximately eight acres which we lease from a related party. The
lease expires
in 2016, but provides for two additional four-year extensions.
(See "Item 12.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions - Related Party
Transactions.")
Our
Iowa location consists of production facilities and office space
situated on
approximately four acres which we lease on a triple net basis from
a
related party.
The lease expires in 2013 and provides us with a right of first
refusal to
purchase the land and buildings at fair market value during the
term
of the lease.
In addition, we entered into a new lease with the same related
party for
approximately three additional acres adjacent to our Iowa facility
expiring in
2013. (See "Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
- Related
Party Transactions.")
The
Georgia location consists of production facilities and office space
which we lease
pursuant to an April 2001 sale/leaseback arrangement originally
expiring in
2021. In February 2006, we renegotiated the lease to permit us to
terminate the
lease with 180 days notice. Despite early termination, we will be
obligated to
continue to pay rent until the earlier to occur of (1) the sale of
the premises
by the landlord; (2) the date on which the landlord begins leasing
the premises
to a new tenant; or (3) three years from the date on which we
vacate the
property.
During
the period of February 16, 2006 to March 1, 2006, we completed the
sale of
substantially all GreenMan of Georgia operating assets to two
companies,
one of which
is co-owned by a former employee. In addition, we entered into a
sublease
agreement with each party with respect to part of the premises
located
in Georgia
with a rolling six month commitment from each party. In December
2006, we
received notice from one of the parties of their intent to
terminate
their sublease
and they vacated the property as of September 30, 2007. The
remaining
subleseee has expressed an interest in the additional portion of
the
Georgia
property.
We
rent approximately 1,100 square feet of office space in Lynnfield,
Massachusetts,
the site of our former corporate headquarters, on a rolling
six-month
basis at $1,250 per month.
We
consider our properties in good condition, well maintained and
generally
suitable to carry on our business activities for the foreseeable
future.
Item 3. Legal
Proceedings
As
of September 30, 2007, approximately seventeen vendors of our
GreenMan
Technologies
of Georgia, Inc. and GreenMan Technologies of Tennessee, Inc.
subsidiaries
had commenced legal action, primarily in the state courts of
Georgia, in
attempts to collect approximately $1.9 million of past due amounts,
plus accruing
interest, attorneys' fees, and costs, all relating to various
services
rendered to these subsidiaries. These amounts are included in
liabilities
related to discontinued operations at September 30, 2007. The
largest
individual claim is for approximately $650,000. As of September 30,
2007, eight
vendors had secured judgments in their favor against GreenMan
Technologies
of Georgia, Inc. for an aggregate of approximately $661,000. As
previously
noted, all of GreenMan Technologies of Tennessee, Inc.'s assets
were
sold in
September 2005 and substantially all of GreenMan Technologies of
Georgia,
Inc.'s assets were sold as of March 1, 2006. All proceeds from
these
sales were
retained by our secured lender and these subsidiaries have no
substantial
assets. We are therefore currently evaluating the alternatives
available to
these subsidiaries.
Although
GreenMan Technologies, Inc. was not a party to any of these
vendor
relationships, three of the plaintiffs have named GreenMan
Technologies,
Inc. as a
defendant along with our subsidiaries. We believe that GreenMan
Technologies,
Inc. has valid defenses to these claims, as well as against any
similar or
related claims that may be made against us in the future, and we
intend to
defend against any such claims vigorously. In addition to the
foregoing, we
are subject to routine claims from time to time in the ordinary
course of our
business. We do not believe that the resolution of any of the
claims that
are currently known to us will have a material adverse effect on
our
company or on
our financial statements.
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
There
were no matters submitted to a vote of our shareholders during the
fourth quarter
of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007.
PART
II
Item 5. Market
for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Small
Business
Issuer's Purchases of Equity Securities
Our
common stock traded on the American Stock Exchange from September
2002
through June
15, 2006 under the symbol "GRN." Our common stock ceased trading on
the Exchange
and was delisted from the Exchange on July 6, 2006. During the
period of June
15 through June 20, 2006 our common stock traded on the Pink
Sheet, and on
June 21, 2006 our stock began trading on the OTC Bulletin Board
under the
symbol "GMTI". The following table sets forth the high and low bid
quotations for
our common stock for the periods indicated as quoted on the
American Stock
Exchange, the Pink Sheet and the OTC Bulletin Board, for these
respective
periods. Quotations from the Pink Sheet and the OTC Bulletin Board
reflect
inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission
and
may not
necessarily represent actual transactions.
Common
Stock
-------------------
High Low
---- ---
Fiscal
2006
-----------
Quarter Ended
December 31, 2005 ........... $
0.27 $ 0.15
Quarter Ended
March 31, 2006
............... 0.32 0.14
Quarter
Ended June 30, 2006
............... 0.57 0.23
Quarter Ending
September 30, 2006
.......... 0.40 0.26
Fiscal
2007
-----------
Quarter Ended
December 31, 2006 ........... $
0.63 $ 0.32
Quarter Ended
March 31, 2007
............... 0.49 0.23
Quarter
Ended June 30, 2007
............... 0.39 0.27
Quarter Ending
September 30, 2007
.......... 0.39 0.30
On
December 26, 2007, the closing price of our common stock was $.52
per
share.
As
of September 30, 2007, we estimate the approximate number of
stockholders
of record of our common stock to be 2,000. This number excludes
individual
stockholders holding stock under nominee security position
listings.
We
have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since
inception
and do not
anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In
addition, our
agreements with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. prohibit the payment of
cash
dividends.
Item 6.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results
of
Operations
In
September 2005, due to the magnitude of continued operating losses,
our
Board of
Directors approved separate plans to divest the operations of our
Georgia and
Tennessee subsidiaries and dispose of their respective assets. In
addition, due
to continuing operation losses, in July 2006 we sold our
California
subsidiary. Accordingly, we have classified all three respective
entity's
results of operations as discontinued operations for all periods
presented in
the accompanying consolidated financial statements. On October 1,
2007, we
acquired Welch Products, Inc. in exchange for 8,000,000 newly
issued
shares of our
commons stock. Because the acquisition was completed after the end
of our fiscal
year, the results described below do not include any contribution
from Welch
Products.
Fiscal Year
ended September 30, 2007 Compared to Fiscal Year ended
September 30,
2006
Net
sales from continuing operations for the fiscal year ended
September
30, 2007
increased $2,570,914 or 15% to $20,178,726 as compared to
$17,607,812
for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2006. Our continuing operations
processed 6%
more or approximately 12.8 million passenger tire equivalents
during the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 compared to approximately 12.1
million
passenger tire equivalents during the same period last year. The
increase in
revenue was primarily attributable to a 27% increase in overall
product
revenue in addition to increased volume on which we realized a 2%
increase in
overall tipping fees (fees we are paid to collect and dispose of
scrap tires)
during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007. The increase also
included
approximately $484,000 of revenue and 174,000 passenger tire
equivalents
associated with an Iowa scrap tire cleanup project which was
completed
during fiscal 2007.
Gross
profit for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 was $5,956,568
or 30% of net
sales, compared to $4,654,059 or 26% of net sales for the fiscal
year ended
September 30, 2006. Our cost of sales increased $1,268,405 or 10%
primarily due
to increased collection and processing costs associated with
higher inbound
volume including $85,000 of increased processing residual waste
costs due to
the completion of several large civil engineering projects (which
use more of
the scrap tire including waste wire) during the fiscal year ended
September 30,
2006.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended
September 30,
2007 increased $291,226 to $3,841,029 or 19% of net sales,
compared to
$3,549,803 or 20% of net sales for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2006. The
results for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 included
approximately
$397,000 of one-time severance costs related to our former
President and
Chief Executive Officer and the sale of our California subsidiary
in July 2006.
This decrease from 2006 was offset by an increase of approximately
$580,000 wages
and performance based incentives in addition to the re-allocation
of
approximately $132,000 of net corporate operating expenses which
were
absorbed by
discontinued operations during the fiscal year ended September 30,
2006.
As
a result of the foregoing, we had operating income from continuing
operations of
$2,115,539 during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 as
compared to
operating income of $1,104,256 for the same period last year.
Interest
and financing expense for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2007 decreased
$1,578,786 to $2,006,299 compared to $3,585,085 during the fiscal
year ended
September 30, 2006. The decrease is attributable to the elimination
of $1,273,014
of non-cash financing fees and interest and $888,000 one-time fees
and expenses
incurred during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 associated
with Laurus
credit facility which was restructured in June 2006. This reduction
was offset by
the inclusion of approximately $566,000 of deferred interest
associated
with the June 2006 Laurus credit facility restructuring. During the
fiscal year
ended September 30, 2006 we recognized approximately $353,000 of
gain on
restructuring associated with the June 30, 2006 restructuring of
our
promissory
note with Republic Services of Georgia, LP (see Note 4 to our
Audited
Consolidated
Financial Statements).
We
recorded a provision for federal and state income tax expense of
approximately
$116,000 and $65,000 during the fiscal years ended September 30,
2007 and 2006,
respectively.
As
a result of the foregoing, our loss after income taxes from
continuing
operations for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 was $3,302 or $.00 per
basic share,
compared to a net loss of $2,244,978 or $.11 per basic share for
the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2006.
During
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, we received credits from
vendors,
recovered certain bad debts and reduced certain accrued expenses
which
offset a
$19,058 increase in our Georgia lease settlement reserve resulting
in
$297,196 ($.01
per basic share) of income from discontinued operations. The
$1,460,981 net
loss ($.08 per basic share) from discontinued operations for the
fiscal year
ended September 30, 2006 includes approximately $1 million
associated
with our former California operations and approximately $461,000
associated
with the costs of exiting associated with our Georgia operation.
Our
net income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 was
$293,894
or $.01 per
basic share as compared to a net loss of $3,705,959 or $.19 per
basic share
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
As
of September 30, 2007, we had $376,764 in cash and cash equivalents
and
a working
capital deficiency of $3,520,493 of which $3,018,503 or 86% of the
total is
associated with our discontinued Georgia subsidiary. We understand
our
continued
existence is dependent on our ability to generate positive
operating
cash flow,
achieve profitable status on a sustained basis and settle existing
obligations.
We believe our efforts to achieve these goals, have been positively
impacted by
the June 30, 2006 restructuring of our Laurus Credit facility and
our
divestiture of historically unprofitable operations during fiscal 2006
and
2005 as
evidenced by our recent two consecutive profitable quarters and a
significant
reduction in our quarterly losses over the prior four quarters.
Our
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows reflect events in the fiscal
year ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 as they affect our liquidity. During
the
fiscal year
ended September 30, 2007, net cash provided by operating activities
was $1,087,933
reflecting a net profit was $293,894 and the impact by the
following
non-cash expenses and changes to our working capital: $1,912,445 of
depreciation
and amortization which offset a $538,162 decrease in accounts
payable, and a
$405,430 increase in accounts receivable. While our net loss for
the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2006 was $3,705,959 our overall cash flow
was positively
impacted by the following non-cash expenses and changes to our
working
capital: $2,808,591 of depreciation and amortization, $264,543 of
non-cash
impairment loss and net loss on disposal of fixed assets and a
decrease
in accounts
receivable and other current assets aggregating $1,736,704 which
offset a
$289,603 decrease in accounts payable.
Net
cash used for investing activities was $933,825 for the fiscal year
ended
September 30, 2007, reflecting the purchase of $941,075 of
equipment
offset by
proceeds from the sale of equipment of $7,250. Net cash used for by
investing
activities was $863,880 for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2006
reflecting the
purchase of $1,424,212 of equipment and the receipt of $560,332
from the sale
of assets.
Net
cash used by financing activities was $416,358 during the fiscal
year
ended
September 30, 2007 reflecting the normal debt and capital lease
repayments.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $764,787 during the
fiscal year
ended September 30, 2006 reflecting the positive impact of the
Laurus
restructuring and other notes payable and the sale of our common
stock.
In
order to reduce our operating costs, address our liquidity needs
and
return to
profitable status, we have implemented and/or are in the processing
of
implementing
the following actions:
Divestiture of
Unprofitable Operations
Due
to the magnitude of the continuing operating losses incurred by our
Georgia ($3.4
million) and Tennessee ($1.8 million) subsidiaries during fiscal
2005 and our
California ($3.2 million since inception) subsidiary in fiscal 2006
our Board of
Directors determined it to be in the best interest of our company
to discontinue
all southeastern and west coast operations and dispose of their
respective
operating assets.
The
divestiture of our Tennessee operations was substantially completed
during the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2005. In September 2005, we adopted
a
plan to
dispose of all Georgia operations and during the quarter ended
December
31, 2005, we
substantially curtailed operations at our Georgia subsidiary. We
completed the
divestiture of all Georgia operating assets as of March 1, 2006.
The aggregate
net losses incurred during fiscal 2006 associated with our
discontinued
Georgia operation was approximately $582,000.
During
the year ended September 30, 2007 we received credits from vendors,
we recovered
certain bad debts and we reduced certain accrued expenses which
offset a
$19,058 increase in our lease settlement reserve (see discussion of
our
Georgia lease
below) resulting in approximately $297,000 of income from
discontinued
Georgia operations.
In
July 2006 we sold our California subsidiary to a third party for
$1,000. The
aggregate net losses including the loss on disposal associated with
the
discontinued operations of our California subsidiary included in the
results
of operations
for year ended September 30, 2006 were approximately $1,005,000
and $3.2
million since inception.
Credit
Facility Refinancing
On
June 30, 2006, we entered into a $16 million amended and restated
credit
facility with Laurus (the "New Credit Facility"). The New Credit
Facility
consists of a
$5 million non-convertible secured revolving note and an $11
million
secured non-convertible term note. Unlike our previous credit
facility
with Laurus,
the New Credit Facility is not convertible into shares of common
stock.
The
revolving note has a term of three years from the closing, bears
interest on
any outstanding amounts at the prime rate published in The Wall
Street Journal
from time to time plus 2%, with a minimum rate of 8%. The amount
we may borrow
at any time under the revolving note is based on our eligible
accounts
receivable and our eligible inventory with an advance rate equal to
90%
of our
eligible accounts receivable (90 days or less) and 50% of finished
goods
inventory up
to a maximum of $5 million minus such reserves as Laurus may
reasonably in
its good faith judgment deem necessary from time to time.
The
term note has a maturity date of June 30, 2009 and bears interest
at
the prime rate
published in The Wall Street Journal from time to time plus 2%
with a minimum
rate of 8%. Interest on the loan is payable monthly commencing
August 1,
2006. Principal will be amortized over the term of the loan,
commencing on
July 2, 2007, with minimum monthly payments of principal as
follows: (i)
for the period commencing on July 2, 2007 through June 2008,
minimum
payments of $150,000; (ii) for the period from July 2008 through
June
2009, minimum
payments of $400,000; and (iii) the balance of the principal shall
be payable on
the maturity date. In May 2007, Laurus agreed to reduce the
monthly
principal payments required under Credit Facility during the period
of
July 2007 to
June 2008 from $150,000 to $100,000 per month. Laurus also agreed
to reduce the
monthly principal payments required during the period of July 2008
to September
2008 from $400,000 to $100,000 per month. The net reduction of
$1,500,000
will be deferred and payable at the June 2009 maturity date. In
addition, we
have agreed to make an excess cash flow repayment as follows: no
later than 95
days following the end of each fiscal year beginning with the
fiscal year
ending on September 30, 2007, we have agreed to make a payment
equal
to 50% of (a)
our aggregate net operating cash flow generated in such fiscal
year less (b)
our aggregate capital expenditures in such fiscal year (up to a
maximum of 25%
of the net operating cash flow calculated in accordance with
clause (a) of
this sentence. The term loan may be prepaid at any time without
penalty. We
used approximately $9,972,000 of the term loan proceeds to repay
certain
existing debt (including approximately $8.5 million due to Laurus)
and
to pay
approximately $888,000 of transaction fees associated with the New
Credit
Facility.
In
connection with the New Credit Facility, we also issued to Laurus a
warrant to
purchase up to an aggregate of 3,586,429 shares of our common stock
at an exercise
price equal to $.01 per share. Laurus has agreed that it will
not, on any
trading day, be permitted to sell any common stock acquired upon
exercise of
this warrant in excess of 10% of the aggregate number of shares of
the common
stock traded on such trading day. Previously issued warrants to
purchase an
aggregate of 1,380,000 shares of our common stock were canceled as
part of these
transactions. The amount of our common stock Laurus may hold at
any given time
is limited to no more than 4.99% of our outstanding capital
stock. This
limitation may be waived by Laurus upon 61 days notice to us and
does not apply
if an event of default occurs and is continuing under the New
Credit
Facility.
On
January 25, 2007 we filed the registration statement under the
Securities Act
of 1933 relating to the 3,586,429 shares underlying the June 30,
2006 warrant
as well as 553,997 shares issuable to another shareholder upon
exercise of a
warrant. The registration statement was declared effective on
February 6,
2007.
Pursuant
to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 15,
"Accounting by
Debtors and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructuring" ("SFAS
15") the New
Credit Facility has been accounted for as a troubled debt
restructuring.
It was determined that, because the effective interest rate of
the New Credit
Facility was lower than that of the previous credit facility
therefore
indicating a concession was granted by Laurus, we are viewed as a
passive
beneficiary of the restructuring, and no new transaction has
occurred.
Under SFAS 15,
a modification of terms "is neither an event that results in a
new asset or
liability for accounting purposes nor an event that requires a new
measurement of
an existing asset or liability." Thus, from a debtor's
standpoint,
SFAS 15 calls for a modification of the terms of a loan to be
accounted for
prospectively. As a result, unamortized balances of $258,900 of
deferred
financing fees and $972,836 of debt discount and beneficial
conversion
features
associated with the previous Laurus credit facility were netted
along
with the value
of the new warrants issued of $344,155 against the new term debt
related to the
portion of the new debt that refinanced the Laurus debt and
related
accrued interest totaling $8,503,416 to provide a net carrying
amount
for that
portion of the debt of $6,927,525. The carrying amount of the loan
will
be amortized
over the term of the loan at a constant effective interest of 20%
applied to the
future cash payments specified by the new loan.
Subject
to applicable cure periods, amounts borrowed under the New Credit
Facility are
subject to acceleration upon certain events of default, including:
(i) any
failure to pay when due any amount we owe under the New Credit
Facility;
(ii) any
material breach by us of any other covenant made to Laurus; (iii)
any
misrepresentation,
in any material respect, made by us to Laurus in the
documents
governing the New Credit Facility; (iv) the institution of certain
bankruptcy and
insolvency proceedings by or against us; (v) the entry of certain
monetary
judgments greater than $50,000 against us that are not paid or
vacated
for a period
of 30 business days; (vi) suspensions of trading of our common
stock; (vii)
any failure to deliver shares of common stock upon exercise of the
warrant;
(viii) certain defaults under agreements related to any of our
other
indebtedness;
and (ix) changes of control of our company. Substantial fees and
penalties are
payable to Laurus in the event of a default.
Our
obligations under the New Credit Facility are secured by first
priority
security interests in all of the assets of our company and all of
the
assets of our
GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota, Inc. and GreenMan Technologies
of Iowa, Inc.
subsidiaries, as well as by pledges of the capital stock of those
subsidiaries.
We expect to grant Laurus additional security interest in the
assets of
Welch Products and its subsidiaries, and believe that the grant of
those security
interests will increase our borrowing base under the term note
described
above.
Additional
Steps to Increase Liquidity
Over
the last several years, we have funded portions of our operating
cash
flow from
sales of equity securities, loans from officers and related
parties,
increased
borrowings and extending payments to our vendors.
In
November 2000, a director loaned us $200,000 under an unsecured
promissory
note which bore interest at 12% per annum with interest due monthly
and the
principal due in November 2001. In June 2001 and again in September
2002, the
director agreed to extend the maturity date of note until November
2004. The
director agreed to extend the maturity date several times and on
August 24,
2006, agreed to convert the $200,000 of principal and $76,445 of
accrued
interest into 953,259 of unregistered shares of common stock at a
price
of $.29 per
share which was the closing price of our stock on the date of
conversion.
In
addition, during the period of January to June 2006, another
director
loaned us
$155,000 under the terms of three unsecured promissory notes which
bear interest
at 10% per annum with interest with principal due during periods
ranging from
June 30, 2006 through September 30, 2006. On April 12, 2006, the
director
agreed in lieu of being repaid in cash at maturity to convert
$76,450
(including
interest of $1,450) into 273,035 shares of unregistered common
stock
at a price of
$.28 which was the closing price of our stock on the date of
conversion. In
addition, on June 5, 2006 the director agreed to convert $15,226
(including
interest of $226) into 42,295 shares of unregistered common stock
at
a price of
$.36 which was the closing price of our stock on the date of
conversion.
The director has been repaid $30,000 during the fiscal year ended
September 30,
2007 and agreed to extend the remaining $35,000 until the earlier
of when all
amounts due under the restructured Laurus credit facility have been
repaid or June
30, 2009.
Operating
Performance Enhancements
Historically,
our tire shredding operations were able to recover and sell
approximately
60% of a processed tire with the balance disposed of as waste wire
residual
(cross-contaminated rubber and steel) at a significant cost. During
the
past several
years we have purchased secondary equipment for our Iowa and
Minnesota
facilities to further process the waste wire residual into saleable
components of
rubber and steel that not only provide new sources of revenue but
also
significantly reduced our residual disposal costs.
During
the third quarter of fiscal 2006, we initiated a $950,000 equipment
upgrade to our
Iowa processing facility installing new fine grind crumb rubber
processing
equipment. The equipment became operational during September 2006.
This new
equipment is expected to increase overall production capacity by over
8
million pounds
per year to over 20 million pounds of crumb rubber capacity.
Approximately
$450,000 of the initiative was funded by a long term loan from the
Iowa
Department of Natural Resources with the balance of the project
funded
through
internally generated cash flow and Iowa's line of credit. The Iowa
line
of credit was
subsequently paid off in conjunction with our June 2006 Laurus
refinancing.
Effects of
Inflation and Changing Prices
Generally,
we are exposed to the effects of inflation and changing prices.
Given the
largest component of our collection and disposal costs is
transportation,
we have been adversely affected by the significant increases in
the cost of
fuel. Additionally, because we rely on floating-rate debt for
certain
financing arrangements, rising interest rates in fiscal 2006 and
higher
prevailing
interest rates in fiscal 2007 have had a negative effect on our
performance.
Based
on our fiscal 2008 operating plan, available working capital,
revenues from
operations and anticipated availability under our working capital
line of credit
with Laurus, we believe we will be able to satisfy our cash
requirements
through fiscal 2008 at which time our Laurus principal payments
increase
substantially. If we are unable to obtain additional financing or
restructure
our remaining principal payments with Laurus, our ability to
maintain our
current level of operations could be materially and adversely
affected and
we may be required to adjust our operating plans accordingly.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We
lease various facilities and equipment under cancelable and
non-cancelable
short and long term operating leases which are described in Note
7 to our
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
Cautionary
Statement
Information
contained or incorporated by reference in this document
contains
forward-looking statements regarding future events and the future
results of
GreenMan Technologies, Inc. within the meaning of the Private
Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are based on current
expectations,
estimates,
forecasts, and projections and the beliefs and assumptions of our
management.
Words such as "expect," "anticipate," "target," "goal," "project,"
"intend,"
"plan," "believe," "seek," "estimate," "will," "likely," "may,"
"designed,"
"would," "future," "can," "could" and other similar expressions
that
are
predictions of or indicate future events and trends or which do not
relate
to historical
matters are intended to identify such forward-looking statements.
These
statements are based on management's current expectations and beliefs
and
involve a
number of risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult
to
predict;
consequently actual results may differ materially from those
projected,
anticipated,
or implied.
Factors That
May Affect Future Results
Risks Related
to our Business
We have been
profitable during the most recent two quarters but lost money in
the previous
eighteen consecutive quarters. We may need additional working
capital if we
do not maintain profitability, which if not received, may force us
to curtail
operations.
While
we recognized net income during the second half of fiscal 2007, we
have incurred
losses from operations in the prior 18 consecutive quarters. As of
September 30,
2007, we had $376,764 in cash and cash equivalents and a working
capital
deficiency of $3,520,493 of which $3,018,503 or 86% of the total is
associated
with our discontinued Georgia subsidiary. We understand our
continued
existence is
dependent on our ability to generate positive operating cash flow
and achieve
profitable status on a sustained basis and settle existing
obligations.
We believe our efforts to achieve these goals, as evidenced by our
recent two
consecutive profitable quarters and a significant reduction in our
quarterly
losses over the prior four quarters have been positively impacted
by
the June 30,
2006 restructuring of our Laurus Credit facility (see Note 4 to our
Audited
Consolidated Financial Statements) and our divestiture of
historically
unprofitable
operations during fiscal 2006 and 2005 (see Note 2 to our Audited
Consolidated
Financial Statements). However, in the first quarter of fiscal
2009, our
principal payments due Laurus are scheduled to increase
substantially.
If we are
unable to obtain additional financing or restructure our remaining
principal
payments with Laurus, our ability to maintain our current level of
operations
could be materially and adversely affected and we may be required
to
adjust our
operating plans accordingly.
The
delisting of our common stock by the American Stock Exchange has
limited our
stock's liquidity and could substantially impair our ability to
raise
capital.
Our
common stock ceased trading on the American Stock Exchange on June
15,
2006 and was
delisted by the Exchange on July 6, 2006 as result of our failure
to maintain
Stockholders' equity in excess of $4 million as required by the
Exchange's
Company Guide when a company has incurred losses in three of the
four
most recent
fiscal years. During the period of June 15 through June 20, 2006 we
were traded on
the Pink Sheet. On June 21, 2006 we began trading on the
Over-The-Counter-Bulletin-Board
under the symbol "GMTI". We believe the
delisting has
limited our stock's liquidity and could substantially impair our
ability to
raise capital.
We
have substantial indebtedness to Laurus Master Fund secured by
substantially
all of our assets. If an event of default occurs under the secured
notes issued
to Laurus, Laurus may foreclose on our assets and we may be forced
to curtail or
cease our operations or sell some or all of our assets to repay
the notes. We
have registered for resale for Laurus the 3,586,429 shares
underlying a
warrant.
On
June 30, 2006, we entered into a $16 million amended and restated
credit
facility with Laurus (the "New Credit Facility"). The New Credit
Facility
consists of a
$5 million non-convertible secured revolving note and an $11
million
secured non-convertible term note.
Subject
to certain grace periods, the notes and agreements provide for the
following
events of default (among others):
o failure
to pay interest and principal when due;
o an
uncured breach by us of any material covenant, term or condition
in
any of the notes or related agreements;
o a
breach by us of any material representation or warranty made in
any
of the notes or in any related agreement;
o any
form of bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding is instituted by or
against
us;
o any
money judgment or similar final process is filed against us for
more
than $50,000 that remains unvacated, unbonded or unstayed for a
period
of 30 business days;
o suspension
of our common stock from our principal trading market for
five
consecutive days or five days during any ten consecutive days;
o any
failure to deliver shares of common stock upon exercise of the
warrant;
o certain
defaults under agreements related to any of our other
indebtedness;
and
o changes
of control of our company.
In
the event of a future default under our agreements with Laurus,
Laurus
may enforce
its rights as a secured party and we may lose all or a portion of
our assets, be
forced to materially reduce our business activities or cease
operations. On
January 25, 2007 we filed the registration statement under the
Securities Act
of 1933 relating to the 3,586,429 shares underlying the June 30,
2006 warrant
as well as 553,997 shares issuable to another shareholder upon
exercise of a
warrant. The registration statement was declared effective on
February 6,
2007.
We will
require additional funding to grow our business, which funding may
not
be available
to us on favorable terms or at all. If we do not obtain funding
when we need
it, our business will be adversely affected. In addition, if we
have to sell
securities in order to obtain financing, the rights of our current
holders may be
adversely affected.
We
will have to seek additional outside funding sources to satisfy our
future
financing demands if our operations do not produce the level of
revenue
we require to
maintain and grow our business. We cannot assure that outside
funding will
be available to us at the time that we need it and in the amount
necessary to
satisfy our needs, or, that if such funds are available, they will
be available
on terms that are favorable to us. If we are unable to secure
financing when
we need it, our business will be adversely affected and we may
need to
discontinue some or all of our operations. If we have to issue
additional
shares of common stock or securities convertible into common stock
in
order to
secure additional funding, our current stockholders will experience
dilution of
their ownership of our shares. In the event that we issue
securities
or instruments
other than common stock, we may be required to issue such
instruments
with greater rights than those currently possessed by holders of
our
common
stock.
Improvement in
our business depends on our ability to increase demand for our
products and
services.
Factors
that could limit demand for our products and services are adverse
events or
economic or other conditions affecting markets for our products and
services,
potential delays in product development, product and service flaws,
changes in
technology, changes in the regulatory environment and the
availability
of competitive products and services.
Our business
is subject to extensive and rigorous government regulation; failure
to comply with
applicable regulatory requirements could substantially harm our
business.
Our
tire recycling activities are subject to extensive and rigorous
government
regulation designed to protect the environment. The establishment
and
operation of
plants for tire recycling are subject to obtaining numerous permits
and complying
with environmental and other government regulations. The process
of obtaining
required regulatory approvals can be lengthy and expensive. The
Environmental
Protection Agency and comparable state and local regulatory
agencies
actively enforce environmental regulations and conduct periodic
inspections to
determine compliance with government regulations. Failure to
comply with
applicable regulatory requirements can result in, among other
things, fines,
suspensions of approvals, seizure or recall of products,
operating
restrictions, and criminal prosecutions. Furthermore, changes in
existing
regulations or adoption of new regulations could impose costly new
procedures for
compliance, or prevent us from obtaining, or affect the timing
of, regulatory
approvals.
The market in
which we operate is highly competitive, fragmented and
decentralized
and our competitors may have greater technical and financial
resources.
The
market for our services is highly competitive, fragmented and
decentralized.
Many of our competitors are small regional or local businesses.
Some of our
larger competitors may have greater financial and technical
resources than
we do. As a result, they may be able to adapt more quickly to new
or emerging
technologies, changes in customer requirements, or devote greater
resources to
the promotion and sale of their services. Competition could
increase if
new companies enter the markets in which we operate or our existing
competitors
expand their service lines. These factors may limit or prevent any
further
development of our business.
Our success
depends on the retention of our senior management and other key
personnel.
Our
success depends largely on the skills, experience and performance
of
our senior
management. The loss of any key member of senior management could
have a
material adverse effect on our business.
Seasonal
factors may affect our quarterly operating results.
Seasonality
may cause our total revenues to fluctuate. We typically
process fewer
tires during the winter and experience a more pronounced volume
reduction in
severe weather conditions. In addition, a majority of our crumb
rubber is used
for playground and athletic surfaces, running tracks and
landscaping/groundcover
applications which are typically installed during the
warmer
portions of the year. Similar seasonal or other patterns may develop
in
our
business.
Inflation and
changing prices may hurt our business.
Generally,
we are exposed to the effects of inflation and changing prices.
Primarily
because the largest component of our collection and disposal costs
is
transportation,
we have been adversely affected by significant increases in the
cost of fuel.
Additionally, because we rely on floating-rate debt for certain
financing
arrangements, rising interest rates in fiscal 2006 and higher
prevailing
interest rates in fiscal 2007 have had a negative effect on our
financial
performance.
If we acquire
other companies or businesses we will be subject to risks that
could hurt our
business.
A
significant part of our business strategy entails future acquisitions
or
significant
investments in businesses that offer complementary products and
services.
Promising acquisitions are difficult to identify and complete for a
number of
reasons. Any acquisitions completed by our company may be made at a
premium over
the fair value of the net assets of the acquired companies and
competition
may cause us to pay more for an acquired business than its
long-term
fair market
value. There can be no assurance that we will be able to complete
future
acquisitions on terms favorable to us or at all. In addition, we may
not
be able to
integrate our Welch Products acquisition or any future acquired
businesses, at
all or without significant distraction of management into our
ongoing
business. In order to finance acquisitions, it may be necessary for
us
to issue
shares of our capital stock to the sellers of the acquired
businesses
and/or to seek
additional funds through public or private financings. Any equity
or debt
financing, if available at all, may be on terms which are not
favorable
to us and, in
the case of an equity financing or the use of our stock to pay for
an
acquisition, may result in dilution to our existing stockholders.
As we grow, we
are subject to growth related risks.
We
are subject to growth-related risks, including capacity constraints
and
pressure on
our internal systems and personnel. In order to manage current
operations and
any future growth effectively, we will need to continue to
implement and
improve our operational, financial and management information
systems and to
hire, train, motivate, manage and retain employees. We may be
unable to
manage such growth effectively. Our management, personnel or
systems
may be
inadequate to support our operations, and we may be unable to achieve
the
increased
levels of revenue commensurate with the increased levels of
operating
expenses
associated with this growth. Any such failure could have a material
adverse impact
on our business, operations and prospects. In addition, the cost
of opening new
facilities and the hiring of new personnel for those facilities
could
significantly decrease our profitability, if the new facilities do
not
generate
sufficient additional revenue.
If we fail to
maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be
able to
accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud. As a
result,
current and
potential shareholders could lose confidence in our financial
reporting,
which would harm our business and the trading price of our stock.
Effective
internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable
financial
reports and effectively minimize the possibility of fraud and its
impact on our
company. If we cannot continue to provide financial reports or
effectively
minimize the possibility of fraud, our business reputation and
operating
results could be harmed.
In
addition, we will be required as currently proposed to include the
management
reports on internal controls as part of our annual report for the
fiscal year
ending September 30, 2008, pursuant to Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, which requires, among other things, that we maintain
effective
internal controls over financial reporting and procedures. In
particular, we
must perform system and process evaluation and testing of our
internal
controls over financial reporting to allow management and our
independent
registered public accounting firm (commencing with the fiscal year
ended
September 30, 2009) to report on the effectiveness of our internal
controls over
financial reporting, as required by Section 404. Our compliance
with Section
404 will require that we incur substantial accounting expense and
expend
significant management efforts.
We
cannot be certain as to the timing of the completion of our
evaluation
and testing,
the timing of any remediation actions that may be required or the
impact these
may have on our operations. Furthermore, there is no precedent
available by
which to measure compliance adequacy. If we are not able to
implement the
requirements relating to internal controls and all other
provisions of
Section 404 in a timely fashion or achieve adequate compliance
with these
requirements or other requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we
might become
subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities
such as the
Securities and Exchange Commission or any securities exchange on
which we may
be trading at that time, which action may be injurious to our
reputation and
affect our financial condition and decrease the value and
liquidity of
our common stock.
Risks Related
to the Securities Market
Our stock
price may be volatile, which could result in substantial losses for
our
shareholders.
Our
common stock is thinly traded and an active public market for our
stock may not
develop. Consequently, the market price of our common stock may be
highly
volatile. Additionally, the market price of our common stock could
fluctuate
significantly in response to the following factors, some of which
are
beyond our
control:
o we
are now traded on the OTC Bulletin Board;
o changes
in market valuations of similar companies;
o announcements
by us or by our competitors of new or enhanced
products,
technologies or services or significant contracts,
acquisitions,
strategic relationships, joint ventures or capital
commitments;
o regulatory
developments;
o additions
or departures of senior management and other key
personnel;
o deviations
in our results of operations from the estimates of
securities
analysts; and
o future
issuances of our common stock or other securities.
We have
options and warrants currently outstanding. Exercise of these
options
and warrant
will cause dilution to existing and new shareholders. Future sales
of common
stock by Laurus and our existing stockholders could result in a
decline in the
market price of our stock.
As
of September 30, 2007, we had options and warrants outstanding to
purchase
approximately 9,875,758 shares of common stock. The exercise of our
options and
warrants will cause additional shares of common stock to be issued,
resulting in
dilution to investors and our existing stockholders. As of
September 30,
2007, approximately 15 million shares of our common stock were
eligible for
sale in the public market. This represents approximately 66% of our
outstanding
shares of common stock. We have registered an additional 2,951,905
shares of
common stock issuable upon exercise of remaining warrants owned by
certain
stockholders, therefore increasing the potential total shares of
our
common stock
eligible for resale in the public market to 18 million. Sales of a
significant
number of shares of our common stock in the public market could
result in a
decline in the market price of our common stock, particularly in
light of the
illiquidity and low trading volume in our common stock.
Our directors,
executive officers and principal stockholders own a significant
percentage of
our shares, which will limit your ability to influence corporate
matters.
Our
directors, executive officers and other principal stockholders
owned
approximately
34 percent of our outstanding common stock as of September 30,
2007.
Accordingly, these stockholders could have a significant influence
over
the outcome of
any corporate transaction or other matter submitted to our
stockholders
for approval, including mergers, consolidations and the sale of all
or
substantially all of our assets and also could prevent or cause a change
in
control. The
interests of these stockholders may differ from the interests of
our other
stockholders. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007,
Laurus
acquired
1,154,098 shares of our common stock upon partial exercise of its
warrant on a
cashless basis. In addition, Laurus can elect to acquire up to
4,811,905
shares of our outstanding stock by exercising its warrants for an
aggregate
exercise price of $48,119. If Laurus were to acquire those shares,
they would
represent 21% of our outstanding shares of common stock at
September
30, 2007. In
addition, the limited number of shares held in public float effect
the liquidity
of our common stock. Third parties may be discouraged from making
a tender offer
or bid to acquire us because of this concentration of ownership.
We have never
paid dividends on our capital stock and we do not anticipate
paying any
cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
We
have paid no cash dividends on our capital stock to date and we
currently
intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to fund the
development
and growth of
our business. In addition, our agreements with Laurus prohibit the
payment of
cash dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our
common stock
will be shareholders' sole source of gain for the foreseeable
future.
Anti-takeover
provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law could
discourage
potential acquisition proposals and could prevent, deter or delay a
change in
control of our company.
Certain
provisions of our Restated Certificate of Incorporation and
By-Laws could
have the effect, either alone or in combination with each other,
of preventing,
deterring or delaying a change in control of our company, even if
a change in
control would be beneficial to our stockholders. Delaware law may
also
discourage, delay or prevent someone from acquiring or merging with
us.
Environmental
Liability
There
are no known material environmental violations or assessments.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
SFAS
123(R) - In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
("FASB")
issued SFAS No. 123(R) (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which is
a
revision of
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No.
123(R)
supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees,
and amends
SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in
SFAS
No. 123(R) is
similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS
No. 123(R)
requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of
employee stock
options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their
fair values.
Pro forma disclosure is not an alternative. SFAS No. 123(R) must be
adopted no
later than the first interim period for fiscal years beginning
after
December 15,
2005. We adopted SFAS No. 123(R) effective on October 1, 2006.
SFAS
No. 123(R) permits public companies to adopt its requirements using
one of two
methods: a "modified prospective" approach or a "modified
retrospective"
approach. Under the modified prospective approach, compensation
cost is
recognized beginning with the effective date based on the
requirements
of SFAS 123(R)
for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and
the
requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) for all awards granted to employees prior
to
the effective
date of SFAS No. 123(R) that remain unvested on the effective
date. The
modified retrospective approach includes the requirements of the
modified
prospective approach but also permits entities to restate based on
the
amounts
previously recognized under SFAS No. 123 for purposes of pro forma
disclosures
either for all prior periods presented or prior interim periods of
the year of
adoption. We have adopted the modified prospective method.
As
permitted by SFAS No. 123, we had accounted for the share-based
payments to
employees using APB Opinion No. 25's intrinsic value method and, as
such,
generally recognize no compensation cost for employee stock
options.
However,
grants of stock to employees have always been recorded at fair value
as
required under
existing accounting standards. We do not expect the adoption of
SFAS No.
123(R) to have a material effect on our results of operations.
However,
our results of
operations could be materially affected by share-based payments
issued after
the adoption of SFAS 123(R). The impact of the adoption of SFAS No.
123(R) cannot
be predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of
share-based
payments granted in the future. The unamortized compensation costs
at September
30, 2007 was $335,944.
SFAS
No. 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess
of
recognized
compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather
than an
operating cash flow under current accounting literature. Since we do
not
have the
benefit of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation
cost,
because of its
net operating loss position, the change will have no immediate
impact on the
consolidated financial statements.
SFAS
No. 154 - In May 2005, FASB issued SFAS No. 154 "Accounting Changes
and Error
Corrections", to amend Opinion 20 and FASB No. 3 and changes the
requirements
for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting
principle.
This Statement provides guidance on the accounting for and
reporting
of accounting
changes and error corrections. It establishes, unless
impracticable,
retrospective application as the required method for reporting a
change in
accounting principle in the absence of explicit transition
requirements
specific to the newly adopted accounting principle. This Statement
also provides
guidance for determining whether retrospective application of a
change in
accounting principle is impracticable and for reporting a change
when
retrospective
application is impracticable. The correction of an error in
previously
issued financial statements is not an accounting change. However,
the
reporting of
an error correction involves adjustments to previously issued
financial
statements similar to those generally applicable to reporting an
accounting
change retrospectively. Therefore, the reporting of a correction of
an error by
restating previously issued financial statements is also addressed
by this
Statement. The effective date for accounting changes and correction
of
errors made in
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. This
pronouncement
has not had a material effect on our financial statements.
SFAS
No. 155 - In February 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 155, "Accounting
for
Certain Hybrid
Financial Instruments" as an amendment to SFAS No. 133 and 140.
This
Statement:
a.
Permits fair value re-measurement for any hybrid financial
instrument
that
contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require
bifurcation;
b.
Clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are
not
subject
to the requirements of Statement 133;
c.
Establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized
financial
assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives
or
that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded
derivative
requiring bifurcation;
d.
Clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of
subordination
are not embedded derivatives; and
e.
Amends Statement 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying
special-purpose
entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that
pertains
to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial
instrument.
This
Statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired or
issued after
the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after
September 15,
2006. The adoption of SFAS 155 has not had a material effect on
our
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
SFAS
No. 157 - In September 2006, the FASB issue SFAS No. 157, "Fair
Value
Measurement"
("SFAS 157"). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring
fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning
after November
17, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are
evaluating the
impact of adopting SFAS 157 on our consolidated financial
position,
results of operations and cash flows.
FIN
No. 48 - In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,
"Accounting
for Uncertain Tax Positions"; an Interpretation of SFAS No. 109
("FIN 48"),
which clarifies the criteria for recognition and measurement of
benefits from
uncertain tax positions. Under FIN 48, an entity should recognize
a tax benefit
when it is "more-likely-than-not", based on the technical merits,
that the
position would be sustained upon examination by a taxing authority.
The
amount to be
recognized, given the "more likely than not" threshold was passed,
should be
measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than
50
percent likely
of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing
authority that
has full knowledge of all relevant information. Furthermore, any
change in the
recognition, derecognition or measurement of a tax position should
be recognized
in the interim period in which the change occurs. We do not expect
the adoption
of FIN 48 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial
position or
results of operations.
Sarbanes-Oxley
Section 404 - The Securities and Exchange Commission issued
two releases
on August 6, 2006 to grant smaller public companies and many
foreign
private issuers further relief from compliance with Section 404 of
the
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. The Commission is proposing to grant relief to
smaller public
companies by extending the date by which non-accelerated filers
must start
providing a report by management assessing the effectiveness of the
company's
internal control over financial reporting. The initial compliance
date
for these
companies would be moved from fiscal years ending on or after July
15,
2007, until
fiscal years ending on or after Dec. 15, 2007. The Commission also
proposes to
extend the date by which non-accelerated filers must begin to
comply
with the
Section 404(b) requirement to provide an auditor's attestation
report
on internal
control over financial reporting in their annual reports. This
deadline would
be moved to the first annual report for a fiscal year ending on
or after Dec.
15, 2008. This proposed extension would result in all
non-accelerated
filers being required to complete only the management's portion
of the
internal control requirements in their first year of compliance with
the
requirements.
This proposal is intended to provide cost savings and efficiency
opportunities
to smaller public companies and to assist them as they prepare to
comply fully
with Section 404's reporting requirements. This proposed extension
will provide
these issuers and their auditors an additional year to consider,
and adapt to,
the changes in Auditing Standard No. 5 that the Commission and the
Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board intend to make, as well as the
guidance for
management the Commission intends to issue, to improve the
efficiency of
the Section 404(b) auditor attestation report process.
Item 7.
Financial Statements
For
information required with respect to this Item 7, see "Consolidated
Financial
Statements" on pages 24 through 48 of this report.
Item 8.
Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial
Disclosure
None.
Item 8A.
Controls and Procedures
Our
management, with the participation of our chief executive officer
and
chief
financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls
and procedures
(as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act
of 1934) as of September 30, 2007. In designing and evaluating our
disclosure
controls and procedures, we recognized that any controls and
procedures, no
matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable
assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily
applied its
judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible
controls and
procedures. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer
and chief
financial officer concluded that as of September 30, 2007, our
disclosure
controls and procedures were (1) designed to ensure that material
information
relating to the company, including our consolidated subsidiaries,
is
made known to
our chief executive officer and chief financial officer by others
within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report was
being prepared
and (2) effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that
information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or
submit
under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time
periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms.
No
change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in
Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the
fiscal
quarter ended
September 30, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Part
III
Item
9. Directors, Executive Officers and Key Employees
Our directors
and executive officers are as follows:
Name Age Position
---- --- --------
Maurice
E. Needham
.......... 67 Chairman of the
Board of Directors
Lyle
Jensen................. 57 Chief
Executive Officer; President;
Director
Charles
E. Coppa
............ 44 Chief
Financial Officer; Treasurer;
Secretary
Dr.
Allen
Kahn.............. 86 Director
Lew
F. Boyd
................. 62 Director
Nicholas
DeBenedictis....... 48 Director
Each
director is elected for a period of one year at the annual meeting
of
stockholders
and serves until his or her successor is duly elected by the
stockholders.
The officers are appointed by and serve at the discretion of the
Board of
Directors. During fiscal 2007, the Board agreed that each outside
director would
receive $2,500 per quarter in recognition of the increased
frequency of
telephonic Board meetings. Previously, outside directors received
$2,500 per
meeting attended. In addition, during fiscal 2006, the Compensation
Committee
agreed to discontinue future option grants made to outside
directors
pursuant the
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan.
We
have established an Audit Committee consisting of Messrs.
DeBenedictis
(Chair) and
Boyd and Dr. Kahn, and a Compensation Committee consisting of
Messrs. Boyd
(Chair) and DeBenedictis. Our Board of Directors has determined
that Mr.
DeBenedictis is an "audit committee financial expert" within the
meaning given
that term by Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-B. Our common stock is
traded on the
OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol "GMTI" and we are not
currently
subject to the listing requirements of any national securities
exchange.
However, our Board of Directors has also determined that Mr.
DeBenedictis
is "independent" within the meaning given to that term by Section
803 of the
American Stock Exchange Company Guide. On April 12, 2006 Mr. Jensen
resigned as
Chair of the Audit Committee and as a member of the Compensation
Committee and
Mr. DeBenedictis became Chair of the Audit Committee and joined
the
Compensation Committee.
MAURICE
E. NEEDHAM has been Chairman since June 1993. From June 1993 to
July 21, 1997,
Mr. Needham also served as Chief Executive Officer. He has also
served as a
Director of Comtel Holdings, an electronics contract manufacturer
since April
1999. He previously served as Chairman of Dynaco Corporation, a
manufacturer
of electronic components which he founded in 1987. Prior to 1987,
Mr. Needham
spent 17 years at Hadco Corporation, a manufacturer of electronic
components,
where he served as President, Chief Operating Officer and Director.
LYLE
JENSEN has been a Director since May 2002. On April 12, 2006, Mr.
Jensen became
our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Jensen previously was Executive
Vice
President/Chief Operations Officer of Auto Life Acquisition Corporation,
an
automotive
aftermarket leader of fluid maintenance equipment. Prior to that he
was a Business
Development and Operations consultant after holding executive
roles as Chief
Executive Officer and minority owner of Comtel and Corlund
Electronics,
Inc. He served as President of Dynaco Corporation from 1988 to
1997; General
Manager of Interconics from 1984 to 1988 and various financial and
general
management roles within Rockwell International from 1973 to 1984.
CHARLES
E. COPPA has served as Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary
since March 1998. From October 1995 to March 1998, he served as
Corporate
Controller. Mr. Coppa was Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of
Food
Integrated Technologies, a publicly-traded development stage company
from
July 1994 to
October 1995. Prior to joining Food Integrated Technologies, Inc.,
Mr. Coppa
served as Corporate Controller for Boston Pacific Medical, Inc., a
manufacturer
and distributor of disposable medical products, and Corporate
Controller for
Avatar Technologies, Inc., a computer networking company.
ALLEN
KAHN, M.D., has been a Director since March 2000. Dr. Kahn operated
a private
medical practice in Chicago, Illinois, which he founded in 1953
until
his retirement
in October 2002. Dr. Kahn has been actively involved as an
investor in
"concept companies" since 1960. From 1965 through 1995 Dr. Kahn
served as a
member of the Board of Directors of Nease Chemical Company
(currently
German Chemical Company), Hollymatic Corporation and Pay Fone
Systems
(currently Pay
Chex, Inc.).
LEW
F. BOYD has been a Director since August 1994. Mr. Boyd is the
founder
and since 1985
has been the Chief Executive Officer of Coastal International,
Inc., an
international business development and executive search firm,
specializing
in the energy and environmental sectors. Previously, Mr. Boyd had
been Vice
President/General Manager of the Renewable Energy Division of
Butler
Manufacturing
Corporation and had served in academic administration at Harvard
and
Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
NICHOLAS
DEBENEDICTIS has been a Director since September 2005. Mr.
DeBenedictis
has been an independent investment advisor for the past nine years
and has over
16 years of experience in the financial markets and securities
business
including positions with E.W. Smith Securities, Smith Barney, and
Janney
Montgomery Scott.
Compliance
with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive
officers, and
persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, to file with
the Securities
and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership of our
common stock
and other equity securities on Form 3 and reports of changes in
such ownership
on Form 4 and Form 5. Officers, directors and 10% stockholders
are required
by the Securities and Exchange Commission regulations to furnish us
with copies of
all Section 16(a) forms they file.
To
the best of management's knowledge, based solely on review of the
copies of such
reports furnished to us during and with respect to, our most
recent fiscal
year, and written representation that no other reports were
required, all
Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers and
directors have
been complied with.
Code of
Ethics
On
May 28, 2005, we adopted a code of ethics which applies to our
principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, principal
accounting
officer or
controller, or persons performing similar functions. We have posted
our code of
ethics on our corporate website, www.greenman.biz.
Item
10. Executive Compensation
Summary
Compensation Table
The
following table summarizes the compensation paid or accrued for
services
rendered during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and
2005, to our
Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer. We did not
grant any
restricted stock awards or stock appreciation rights or make any
long-term plan
payouts during the periods indicated.
Annual
Compensation
------------------- Option All
Other
Name and
Principal Position Fiscal
Year Salary Bonus Awards(1)(2) Compensation(3) Total
--------------------------- ----------- ------ ----- ------------ --------------- -----
Lyle Jensen
............... 2007 $195,000 $212,000 $
32,466 $17,901 $457,367
Chief
Executive
Officer 2006 81,250 43,000 107,157 6,653 238,060
Charles E.
Coppa
.......... 2007 $150,000 $
51,000 $
10,533 $11,912 $223,445
Chief
Financial
Officer 2006 145,000 48,000 38,407 8,396 239,803
(1) Amounts
shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the named
executive
officer. The amounts in the Option Awards column reflect the
dollar
amount recognized as compensation cost for financial statement
reporting
purposes for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007 and
September
30, 2006, in accordance with SFAS 123(R) for all stock options
granted
in such fiscal years. The calculation in the table above excludes
all
assumptions with respect to forfeitures. There can be no assurance
that
the amounts set forth in the Option Awards column will ever be
realized.
A forfeiture rate was used in the expense calculation in the
financial
statements.
(2) Options
granted have a ten-year term and vest at an annual rate of 20%
over
a five-year period from the date of grant with the exception of the
25,000
granted to Mr. Jensen which pursuant to the terms of his
employment,
vest immediately on the date of grant and have a ten year
term.
(3) Represents
payments made to or on behalf of Messrs. Jensen and Coppa for
health,
life and disability insurance and auto allowances.
Employment
Agreements
On
April 12, 2006, we entered into a five-year employment agreement
with
Mr. Jensen
pursuant to which Mr. Jensen will receive a base salary of $195,000
per year. The
agreement automatically renews for one additional year upon each
anniversary,
unless notice of non-renewal is given by either party. We may
terminate the
agreement without cause on 30 days' prior notice. The agreement
provides for
payment of twelve months' salary and certain benefits as a
severance
payment for termination without cause. Any increases in Mr.
Jensen's
base salary
will be made in the discretion of the Board of Directors upon the
recommendation
of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Jensen also received a
relocation
allowance of $23,603 and receives a car allowance of $600 per
month.
Mr. Jensen has
been granted a qualified option under our 2005 Stock Option Plan
to purchase
500,000 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $.28
per share. The
options vest at an annual rate of 20% over a five-year period
from date of
grant and have a ten-year term.
The
agreement also provides for Mr. Jensen to be eligible to receive
incentive
compensation based on (i) non-financial criteria which may be
established by
the Board of Directors and (ii) upon a calculation of our annual
audited
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
("EBITDA") as
a percentage of our revenue, as follows:
EBITDA
as
%
of
Revenue Performance
Incentive
------------ ---------------------
Base: 10.0
% or Less None
Level
I: 10.1% -
12.0% 10% of EBITDA
dollars above Base
Level
II: 12.1% -
15.0% 12% of EBITDA
dollars above Base
Level
III: >
15.0% 15%
of EBITDA dollars above Base
During
fiscal 2007, Mr. Jensen earned an incentive bonus of $262,000 but
agreed to
receive a reduced amount of $212,000. During fiscal 2007, Mr.
Jensen
used
approximately $52,000 (net of taxes) of his bonus to purchase
100,000
shares of
unregistered common stock from the company. During fiscal 2006, Mr.
Jensen
received an incentive bonus of $43,000 based on our performance from
his
date of hire
to the fiscal year-end. In addition, Mr. Jensen will be eligible to
be awarded
qualified options to purchase up to 100,000 additional shares of
common stock
annually, with the actual amounts contingent on achieving certain
levels of
EBITDA performance. In December 2006, Mr. Jensen was granted
immediately
exercisable options to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock at an
exercise price
of $.36 per share based on fiscal 2006 EBITDA performance. The
right to
exercise all options will accelerate in full immediately prior to
any
transaction or
series of sequenced events in which all or substantially all of
our assets or
common stock are sold to or merged with a third party or third
parties. In
addition, upon signing of his employment agreement, Mr. Jensen
purchased
500,000 unregistered shares of our common stock at $.28 which was
the
closing bid
price of our common stock on the date the agreement was executed.
Mr.
Jensen's employment agreement was amended in January 2008 to
increase
Mr. Jensen's
base salary to $250,000 per year, with such increase retroactive to
October 1
2007. In addition, the amendment deleted the EBITDA-based incentive
compensation
measures described above, and provides instead for incentive
compensation
in respect of any fiscal year of up to the lesser of (x) 20% of our
audited annual
profit after tax, as reported in the financial statements
included in
our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for such fiscal year and (y)
$150,000.
In
April 1999, we entered into a three-year employment agreement with
Robert Davis,
our former Chief Executive Officer pursuant to which he received a
salary of
$230,000 per annum. The agreement automatically renewed for three
additional
years upon each anniversary, unless notice of non-renewal is given
by
either party,
and provided for payment of twelve months salary as a severance
payment for
termination without cause. The agreement also provided for
incentive
compensation
based on the following certain financial performance measures. No
bonus was
payable for fiscal 2006 or 2005. On April 12, 2006, the Board of
Directors
accepted Mr. Davis's resignation as President, Chief Executive
Officer
and a member
of the Board of Directors. Pursuant to the terms of his employment
agreement, Mr.
Davis received severance of 12 months salary plus benefits
starting May
1, 2006 (valued at $260,000) plus all accrued and unpaid vacation
(valued at
$40,000). All amounts due Mr. Davis have been paid as of September
30,
2007.
In
June 1999, we entered into a two-year employment agreement with Mr.
Coppa pursuant
to which Mr. Coppa received a salary of $130,000 per annum. In
July 2006, the
Compensation Committee agreed to increase Mr. Coppa's base salary
to $150,000.
The agreement automatically renews for two additional years upon
each
anniversary, unless notice of non-renewal is given by either party.
Any
increases or
bonuses will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors
upon the
recommendation of the Compensation Committee. During fiscal 2007
and
2006, the
Compensation Committee agreed to grant Mr. Coppa discretionary
bonuses
of $51,000 and
$48,000, respectively. During fiscal 2006, Mr. Coppa used $20,000
(net of taxes)
of his bonus to purchase 50,000 shares of unregistered common
stock from the
company. The agreement provides for payment of twelve months
salary as a
severance payment for termination without cause.
Mr.
Coppa's employment agreement was amended in January 2008 to
increase
Mr. Coppa's
base salary to $165,000 per year, effective January 1, 2008. In
addition, the
amendment deleted the discretionary incentive compensation
measures
described above, and provides instead for incentive compensation in
respect of any
fiscal year to be based on mutually agreed performance measures
as determined
our Compensation Committee, with maximum potential incentive
compensation
in respect of any fiscal year equal to 25% of Mr. Coppa's base
salary for
such fiscal year.
In
June 2003, we entered into a three-year employment agreement with
Mr.
Needham
pursuant to which Mr. Needham receives a salary of $90,000 per annum.
In
July 2006, Mr.
Needham agreed to a 30% reduction in his base salary in
recognition of
on going efforts to reduce corporate overhead. The agreement
automatically
renews for three additional years upon each anniversary, unless
notice of
non-renewal is given by either party. Any increases or bonuses will
be
made at the
discretion of our Board of Directors upon the recommendation of the
Compensation
Committee. The agreement provides for payment of twelve months
salary as a
severance payment for termination without cause.
Outstanding
Equity Awards
The
following table sets forth information concerning outstanding stock
options for
each named executive officer as of September 30, 2007:
Number
of Securities Underlying
Unexercised
Options Exercise Option
------------------- Price Expiration
Name Date
of
Grant Exercisable Unexercisable Per
Share Date
---- ------------- ----------- ------------- --------- ----
Lyle
Jensen............. March 12, 2002
(1) 25,000 -- $1.51 March
12, 2012
August
23, 2002
(2) 2,500 -- $1.80 August
23, 2012
February
20, 2003
(3) 2,000 -- $1.95 February
20, 2013
April
24, 2004
(3) 2,000 -- $1.10 April
24, 2014
June
15, 2005
(3) 2,000 -- $0.51 June
15, 2015
April
12, 2006
(4) 500,000 400,000 $0.28 April
12, 2016
December
18, 2006
(4) 100,000 100,000 $0.35 December
18, 2016
December
29, 2006
(5) 25,000 -- $0.36 December
29, 2016
Charles E.
Coppa ....... March 23,1998
(2) 130,000 -- $1.09 March
23, 2008
July
22,1999
(2) 90,000 -- $0.53 July
22, 2009
February
18, 2000
(1) 100,000 -- $0.50 February
18, 2010
January 12,
2001
(2) 40,000 -- $0.40 January 12,
2011
August
23, 2002
(2) 7,500 -- $1.80 August
23, 2012
June
6, 2006
(4) 137,000 109,600 $0.36 June
6, 2016
September
28,2007
(4) 45,000 45,000 $0.35 September
28,2017
(1) These
options are non-qualified, have a ten-year term and vest at an
annual
rate of 20% over a five-year period from the date of grant
(2) These
options were granted under the 1993 Stock Option Plan, have a
ten-year
term and vest at an annual rate of 20% over a five-year period
from
the date of grant
(3) These
options were granted under the 1996 Non Employee Stock Option Plan,
have
a ten-year term and vested immediately on the date of grant.
(4) These
options were granted under the 2005 Stock Option Plan, have a
ten-year
term and vest at an annual rate of 20% over a five-year period
from
the date of grant.
(5) These
options were granted under the 2005 Stock Option Plan, have a
ten-year
term and vested immediately on the date of grant.
Director
Compensation
The
following table sets forth information concerning the compensation
of
our Directors
who are not named executive officers for the fiscal year ended
September 30,
2007:
Fees
Earned or Paid in Option
Awards All Other
Name Cash
or Common Stock (1)
(2) Compensation Total
---- -------------------- ------- ------------ -----
Maury
Needham....... $ -- $
97,634 $ -- $
97,634
Lew
Boyd............ $ 10,000 $
8,050 $ -- $
18,050
Dr. Allen
Kahn...... $ 10,000 $
8,050 $ -- $
18,050
Nick
DeBenedictis... $ 10,000 $
55,292 $ -- $
65,292
(1) Amounts
shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the named
director.
The amounts in the Option Awards column reflect the dollar
amount
recognized as compensation cost for financial statement reporting
purposes
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, in accordance with
SFAS
123(R) for all stock options granted in such fiscal year. The
calculation
in the table above excludes all assumptions with respect to
forfeitures.
There can be no assurance that the amounts set forth in the
Option
Awards column will ever be realized. A forfeiture rate was used in
the
expense calculation in the financial statements.
(2) As
of September 30, 2007, each non-employee director holds the
following
aggregate
number of shares under outstanding stock options:
Number
of Shares
Underlying
Outstanding
Name Stock
Options
---- -------------
Maury
Needham........ 1,229,462
Lew
Boyd............. 160,394
Dr.
Allen
Kahn....... 51,500
Nick
DeBenedictis.... 235,000
During
fiscal 2007, the Board agreed that each outside director would
receive $2,500
per quarter in recognition of the increased frequency of
telephonic
Board meetings. Previously, outside directors received $2,500 per
meeting
attended. In addition, during fiscal 2006, the Compensation
Committee
agreed to
discontinue future option grants made to outside directors pursuant
the
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan.
Stock Option
Plans
Our
1993 Stock Option Plan (the "2003 Plan") was established to provide
options to
purchase shares of common stock to our employees, officers,
directors
and
consultants. In March 2001, our stockholders approved an increase to
the
number of
shares authorized under the 1993 Plan to 3,000,000 shares. The 1993
Plan expired
on June 10, 2004.
As
of September 30, 2007, there were 1,022,356 options granted and
outstanding
under the 1993 Plan which are exercisable at prices ranging from
$0.38 to
$1.80.
On
March 18, 2005, our Board of Directors adopted the 2005 Stock
Option
Plan (the
"2005 Plan"), which was subsequently approved by our stockholders
on
June 16, 2005.
The 2005 Plan replaced the 1993 Plan. In April 2004, our Board
adopted a
replacement stock option plan (the "2004 Plan") but did not submit
it
for
ratification by our stockholders. The 2004 Plan was terminated by our
Board
on March 18,
2005, and all options granted under that plan have been terminated.
Options
granted under the 2005 Plan may be either options intended to qualify
as
"incentive
stock options" under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as
amended; or non-qualified stock options.
Incentive
stock options may be granted under the 2005 Plan to employees,
including
officers and directors who are employees. Non-qualified options may
be
granted to our
employees, directors and consultants. The 2005 Plan is
administered
by our Board of Directors, which has the authority to determine:
o the
persons to whom options will be granted;
o the
number of shares to be covered by each option;
o whether
the options granted are intended to be incentive stock
options;
o the
manner of exercise; and
o the
time, manner and form of payment upon exercise of an option.
Incentive
stock options granted under the 2005 Plan may not be granted at
a price less
than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant
(or less than
110% of fair market value in the case of persons holding 10% or
more of our
voting stock). Non-qualified stock options may be granted at an
exercise price
established by our Board which may not be less than 85% of fair
market value
of our shares on the date of grant. Current tax laws adversely
impact
recipients of non-qualified stock options granted at less than fair
market value,
however, we do not expect to make such grants. Incentive stock
options
granted under the 2005 Plan must expire no more than ten years from
the
date of grant,
and no more than five years from the date of grant in the case of
incentive
stock options granted to an employee holding 10% or more of our
voting
stock.
During
the year ended September 30, 2007, 800,000 options were granted
under the 2005
Plan at prices ranging from $.35 to $.55. As of September 30,
2007, there
were 1,662,000 options granted and outstanding under the 2005 Plan
which are
exercisable at prices ranging from $0.28 to $0.55.
Non-Employee
Director Stock Option Plan
Our
1996 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan is intended to promote
our interests
by providing an inducement to obtain and retain the services of
qualified
persons who are not officers or employees to serve as members of
our
Board of
Directors. The Board of Directors has reserved 60,000 shares of
common
stock for
issuance under Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan.
Each
person who was a member of the Board of Directors on January 24,
1996, and who
was not an officer or employee, was automatically granted an
option to
purchase 2,000 shares of common stock. In addition, after an
individual's
initial election to the Board of Directors, any director who is not
an officer or
employee and who continues to serve as a director will
automatically
be granted on the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders an
additional
option to purchase 2,000 shares of common stock. The exercise price
per share of
options granted under the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan
is 100% of the
fair-market value of the common stock on the business day
immediately
prior to the date of the grant and each option is immediately
exercisable
for a period of ten years from the date of the grant. During fiscal
2006, the
Compensation Committee agreed to discontinue future option grants
made
under the
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan.
As
of September 30, 2007, options to purchase 38,000 shares of our
common
stock have
been granted under the 1996 Non-Employee Director Stock Option
Plan,
of which
28,000 are outstanding and exercisable at prices ranging from $0.38
to
$1.95.
Employee
Benefit Plan
In
August 1999, we implemented a Section 401(k) plan for all eligible
employees.
Employees are permitted to make elective deferrals of up to 15% of
employee
compensation and employee contributions to the 401(k) plan are
fully
vested at all
times. We may make discretionary contributions to the 401(k) plan
which become
vested over a period of five years. We did not make any
discretionary
contributions to the 401(k) plan during the fiscal years ended
September 30,
2007 and 2006.
Item
11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and
Related
Stockholder Matters
The
following tables set forth certain information regarding beneficial
ownership of
our common stock as of September 30, 2007: o by each of our
directors and
executive officers; o by all of our directors and executive
officers as a
group; and o by each person (including any "group" as used in
Section 13(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) who is known by us to own
beneficially
5% or more of the outstanding shares of common stock.
Unless
otherwise indicated below, to the best of our knowledge, all
persons listed
below have sole voting and investment power with respect to their
shares of
common stock, except to the extent authority is shared by spouses
under
applicable law. As of September 30, 2007, 22,880,435 shares of our
common
stock were
issued and outstanding.
Security
Ownership of Management and Directors
Number
of Shares
Beneficially Percentage
Name
(1) Owned
(2) of Class (2)
-------- --------- ------------
Dr. Allen Kahn
(3)................. 4,364,931 19.06%
Maurice E.
Needham
(4)............. 2,232,801 9.39%
Charles E.
Coppa
(5)............... 781,828 3.36%
Lyle Jensen
(6).................... 768,522 3.34%
Nicholas
DeBenedictis
(7).......... 762,454 3.33%
Lew F. Boyd
(8).................... 401,572 1.75%
All officers
and directors
as
a group (6
persons)............. 9,312,108 38.08%
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
Number
of Shares
Beneficially Percentage
Name
(1) Owned
(2) of Class (2)
-------- --------- ------------
Laurus Master
Fund, Ltd.
(9)....... 1,141,734 4.99%
----------
(1) Except
as noted, each person's address is care of GreenMan Technologies,
Inc.,
12498 Wyoming Avenue South, Savage, Minnesota, 55378.
(2) Pursuant
to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, shares of
common
stock that an individual or group has a right to acquire within 60
days
pursuant to the exercise of options or warrants are deemed to be
outstanding
for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of such
individual
or group, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose
of
computing the percentage ownership of any other person shown in the
table.
(3) Includes
16,500 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to immediately
exercisable
stock options.
(4) Includes
904,462 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to immediately
exercisable
stock options. Also includes 59,556 shares of common stock
owned
by Mr. Needham's wife.
(5) Includes
394,900 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to immediately
exercisable
stock options.
(6) Includes
133,500 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to immediately
exercisable
stock options.
(7) Includes
365,000 shares of common stock owned by Mr. DeBenedictis's wife.
(8) Includes
125,394 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to immediately
exercisable
stock options.
(9) Laurus
holds warrants to purchase up to 4,811,905 shares of common stock
that
are exercisable (subject to the following sentence) at an exercise
price
of $.01 per share. The warrants are not exercisable, however, to
the
extent
that (a) the number of shares of our common stock held by Laurus
and
(b) the number of shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise
of
the
warrant would result in beneficial ownership by Laurus of more than
4.99%
of our outstanding shares of common stock. Laurus may waive these
provisions,
or increase or decrease that percentage, with respect to the
warrant
on 61 days' prior notice to us, or without notice if we are in
default
under our credit facility. Unless and until Laurus waives these
provisions,
then Laurus beneficially owns 1,141,734 shares of our common
stock
issuable pursuant to underlying warrant. Laurus's address is 335
Madison
Avenue, 10th Floor, New York, New York 10017.
Common
Stock Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
For
descriptions of equity compensation plans under which our common
stock
is authorized
for issuance as of September 30, 2007, see Note 8 ("Stockholders'
Equity") of
the Consolidated Financial Statements contained herein. For
additional
information concerning certain compensation arrangements, not
approved by
stockholders, under which options to purchase common stock may be
issued, see
"Executive Compensation - Employment Agreements', above, and
"Certain
Relationships and Transactions - Stock Issuances: Stock Options;
Warrants",
below.
Item 12.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Stock
Issuances; Warrants
In
April 2006, Mr. Jensen purchased 500,000 unregistered shares of our
common stock
at $.28 per share which was the closing bid price of the common
stock on the
date his employment agreement was executed.
During
the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Mr. DeBenedictis agreed to convert
$91,676 of
principal and interest due him under certain unsecured promissory
notes payable
into 315,330 shares of our unregistered common stock.
During
the last half fiscal 2006, Messers. Jensen, Needham, Boyd,
DeBenedictis,
Coppa and Dr. Kahn agreed to accept 231,695 shares of unregistered
common stock
(valued at $82,046 at date of conversion) in lieu of cash for
certain
director's fees and expenses due the individuals. In addition, on
August
1, 2006, Mr.
Coppa purchased 50,000 unregistered shares of common stock (valued
at $15,000 at
date of purchase).
On
August 21, 2007, Mr. Jensen purchased 100,000 unregistered shares
of
common stock
(valued at $35,000 at date of purchase).
During
the year ended September 30, 2007, Messrs. Boyd, DeBenedictis and
Dr. Kahn
agreed to accept 84,838 shares of unregistered common stock valued
at
$30,796 (all
shares were issued at a price equal to the closing price of our
common stock
on date of issuance) in lieu of cash for certain director's fees,
interest and
expenses due the directors.
Loans;
Personal Guarantees
Dr.
Kahn loaned us $200,000 under a November 2000 unsecured promissory
note which
bears interest at 12% per annum with interest due monthly and the
principal
originally due in November 2001. In June 2001, Dr. Kahn agreed to
extend the
maturity date of the note for an additional twelve months from its
original
maturity. In September 2002, Dr. Kahn again agreed to extend the
maturity of
the note until November 2004. Dr. Kahn agreed to extend the
maturity
dated several
times and on August 24, 2006, Dr. Kahn agreed to convert the
$200,000 of
principal and $76,445 of accrued interest into 953,259 unregistered
shares of
common stock.
Between
the period of June and August 2003, two immediate family members
of an officer
loaned us a total of $400,000 under the terms of two-year,
unsecured
promissory notes which bear interest at 12% per annum with interest
due quarterly
and the principal due upon maturity. In March 2004, these same
individuals
loaned us an additional $200,000 in aggregate, under similar terms
with the
principal due upon maturity March 2006. These individuals each
agreed
to invest the
entire $100,000 principal balance of their June 2003 notes
($200,000 in
aggregate) into our April 2004 private placement of investment
units and each
received 113,636 units in these transactions. In addition, the
two
individuals agreed to extend the maturity of the remaining balance of
these
notes,
$400,000 at September 30, 2007 until the earlier of when all amounts
due
under the
Laurus credit facility have been repaid or June 30, 2009.
In
September 2003, our former Chief Executive Officer loaned us
$400,000
under a
September 30, 2003 unsecured promissory note which bore interest at
12%
per annum.
with interest due quarterly and the principal due March 31, 2004
(subsequently
extended to September 30, 2004). In 2006 he agreed to extend the
maturity of
this note until the earlier of when all amounts due under the
Laurus
credit
facility have been repaid or June 30, 2009. In July 2006, he assigned
the
remaining
balance of $99,320 as follows: $79,060 of the remaining balance to
one
of Mr.
Needham's immediate family members noted above and the remaining
balance
of $20,260
plus accrued interest of $13,500 to Mr. Needham.
Between
January and June 2006, Mr. DeBenedictis loaned us $155,000 under
three
unsecured promissory notes which bear interest at 10% per annum
with
interest and
principal due during periods ranging from June 30, 2006 through
September 30,
2006. On April 12, 2006, Mr. DeBenedictis agreed in lieu of being
repaid in cash
at maturity to convert $76,450 (including interest of $1,450)
into 273,035
shares of unregistered common stock at a price of $.28 which was
the closing
price of our stock on the date of conversion. In addition, on June
5, 2006 Mr.
DeBenedictis agreed to convert $15,226 (including interest of $226)
into 42,295
shares of unregistered common stock at a price of $.36 which was
the
closing price
of our stock on the date of conversion. Mr. DeBenedictis has
agreed be paid
$10,000 per month during the first half of fiscal 2007 and extend
the remaining
$35,000 until the earlier of when all amounts due under the
restructured
Laurus credit facility have been repaid or June 30, 2009.
Related Party
Transactions
We
rent several pieces of equipment on a monthly basis from Valley
View
Farms, Inc.
and Maust Asset Management, LLC, two companies co-owned by one of
our employees.
In January 2005, we entered into three equipment operating lease
agreements
with Maust Asset Management. Under these leases, we are required to
pay between
$1,500 and $2,683 per month rental and have the ability to purchase
the equipment
at the end of the lease for between $12,000 and $16,000. Rent
expense
associated with payments made to the two companies for the fiscal
years
ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 was $187,554 and $263,801,
respectively.
In
July 2002, our Minnesota subsidiary entered into a four-year
equipment
lease with
Valley View Farms. Under the lease, we were required to pay rent of
$4,394 per
month until the lease termination in July 2006 at which time we
purchased the
equipment for $60,000 as provided for in the lease.
During
fiscal 2006, we entered into 4 new capital lease agreements with
Maust Asset
Management for equipment valued at $423,038. We are required to pay
rent of
between $2,543 and $4,285 per month and have the ability to purchase
the
equipment at
the end of the lease for prices ranging from $11,250 to $15,000 per
unit.
During
fiscal 2007, we entered into a new capital lease agreement with
Maust Asset
Management for equipment valued at $64,719. We are required to pay
rent of $1,614
per month and have the ability to purchase the equipment at the
end of the
lease for $8,512.
In
April 2003, our Iowa subsidiary entered into a ten-year lease
agreement
with Maust
Asset Management for our Iowa facility. Under the lease, monthly
rent
payments of
$8,250 plus real estate taxes are required for the first five
years,
increasing to
$9,000 plus real estate taxes per month for the remaining five
years. The
lease also provides us a right of first refusal to purchase the
land
and buildings
at fair market value during the term of the lease. Maust Asset
Management
acquired the property from the former lessor. In April 2005, our
Iowa
subsidiary
entered into an eight-year lease agreement with Maust Asset
Management for
approximately three acres adjacent to our existing Iowa facility.
Under that
lease, monthly rent payments of $3,500 are required. For the fiscal
years ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006, payments made in connection with these
leases
amounted to $179,203 and $163,221, respectively.
During
March 2004, our Minnesota subsidiary sold all of its land and
buildings to
an entity co-owned by one of our employees for $1,400,000,
realizing a
gain of $437,337 which has been recorded as unearned income and
classified as
a non current liability in the accompanying financial statements.
Simultaneous
with the sale, we entered into an agreement to lease the property
back for a
term of 12 years at an annual rent of $195,000, increasing to
$227,460 over
the term of the lease. The gain is being recognized as income
ratably over
the term of the lease. The lease provides for two additional four
year
extensions. The building lease is classified as a capital lease at
September 30,
2007 valued at $1,036,000 with the portion allocated to land
treated as an
operating lease. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007 and
2006, payments
made in connection with this lease amounted to $241,539 and
$240,672,
respectively.
All
transactions, including loans, between us and our officers,
directors,
principal
stockholders, and their affiliates are approved by a majority of
the
independent
and disinterested outside directors on the Board of Directors.
Management
believes these transactions were consummated on terms no less
favorable to
us than could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
Item 13.
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
The
following exhibits are filed with this document:
Exhibit
No. -- Description
----------- -----------
2.1
(1) -- Asset Purchase Agreement
dated February 17, 2006 between
GreenMan
Technologies of Georgia, Inc., GreenMan
Technologies,
Inc. and Tires Into Recycled Energy and
Supplies,
Inc.
2.2
(1) -- Asset Purchase Agreement
dated March 1, 2006 between
GreenMan
Technologies of Georgia, Inc., GreenMan
Technologies,
Inc. and MTR of Georgia, Inc.
2.3
(1) -- Amendment No. 1 to Lease
Agreement dated February 28, 2006
between
GreenMan Technologies of Georgia, Inc. and Mart
Management,
Inc.
2.4
(19) -- Share Exchange Agreement among
GreenMan Technologies,
Inc.,
Welch Products, Inc. and the Stockholders of Welch
Products,
Inc., dated October 1, 2007
2.5
(19) -- Escrow Agreement among GreenMan
Technologies, Inc., Welch
Products,
Inc., the Stockholders of Welch Products, Inc.
and
Dreher, Simpson and Jensen, P.C., as Escrow Agent,
dated
October 1, 2007
2.6
(19) -- Agreement among GreenMan
Technologies, Inc., Welch
Products,
Inc., the Stockholders of Welch Products, Inc.
and
Laurus Master Fund Ltd., dated October 1, 2007
3.1
(2) -- Restated Certificate of
Incorporation as filed with the
Secretary
of State of the State of Delaware on May 1,
2003,
as amended
3.2
(3) -- By-laws of GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
4.1
(3) -- Specimen certificate for
Common Stock of GreenMan
Technologies,
Inc.
4.2
(2) -- Option Agreement, dated
July 20, 2005 by and between
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc. and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.
4.3
(4) -- Common Stock Purchase
Warrant, dated June 30, 2006, issued
To
Laurus Master Fund
4.4
(4) -- Registration Rights
Agreement dated June 30, 2006, made by
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc. to Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.
10.1
(5) -- Securities Purchase
Agreement, dated June 30, 2004, by and
between
GreenMan Technologies, Inc. and Laurus Master
Fund,
Ltd.
10.2
(5) -- Security Agreement, dated
June 30, 2004, by and among
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc. and certain of its
subsidiaries,
in favor of Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.
10.3
(5) -- Master Security Agreement,
dated June 30, 2004, by and
among
GreenMan Technologies, Inc. and certain of its
subsidiaries,
in favor of Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.
10.4
(5) -- Subsidiary Guarantee, dated
June 30, 2004, by and among
GreenMan
Technologies of Minnesota, Inc., GreenMan
Technologies
of Georgia, Inc., GreenMan Technologies of
Iowa,
Inc., GreenMan Technologies of Tennessee, Inc.,
GreenMan
Technologies of Wisconsin, Inc. and GreenMan
Technologies
of California, Inc., in favor of Laurus
Master
Fund, Ltd.
10.5
(5) -- Stock Pledge Agreement,
dated June 30, 2004, by and among
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc. and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.
10.6
(6) -- Amendment No. 1 and Waiver
dated March 22, 2005 by and
among
GreenMan Technologies, Inc. and certain of its
subsidiaries,
in favor of Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.
10.7
(2) -- Securities Purchase
Agreement, dated July 20, 2005, by and
between
GreenMan Technologies, Inc. and Laurus Master
Fund,
Ltd.
10.8
(2) -- Reaffirmation and
Ratification Agreement, dated July 20,
2005
by and between GreenMan Technologies, Inc. and
certain
of its subsidiaries, in favor of Laurus Master
Fund,
Ltd.
10.9
(7) -- Waiver dated April 8, 2006
by and among GreenMan
Technologies,
Inc. and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.
10.10
(4) -- Amended and Restated Security
Purchase Agreement, dated
June
30, 2006, by and among GreenMan Technologies, Inc.
and
certain of its subsidiaries, in favor of Laurus Master
Fund,
Ltd.
10.11
(4) -- Secured Non-Convertible Term
Note, dated June 30, 2006,
made
by GreenMan Technologies, Inc. to Laurus Master Fund,
Ltd.
10.12
(4) -- Secured Non-Convertible Revolving
Note, dated June 30,
2006,
made by GreenMan Technologies, Inc. to Laurus Master
Fund,
Ltd.
10.13
(4) -- Reaffirmation and Ratification
Agreement dated June 30,
2006,
made by GreenMan Technologies, Inc. to Laurus Master
Fund,
Ltd.
10.14
(4) -- Stock Pledge Agreement, dated
June 30, 2006, by and among
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc. and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.
10.15
(4) -- Escrow Agreement dated June 30,
2006, among GreenMan
Technologies,
Inc., Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., and Loeb &
Loeb
LLP, as Escrow Agent
10.16
(18) -- Letter dated May 7, 2007 between
GreenMan Technologies,
Inc.
and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.
10.17
(3) -- 1993 Stock Option
Plan
10.18
(8) -- 2005 Stock Option
Plan
10.19
(3) -- Form of confidentiality and
non-disclosure agreement for
executive
employees
10.20
(9) -- Employment Agreement dated
April 1, 2003 between GreenMan
Technologies,
Inc. and Maurice E. Needham
10.21
(10) -- Employment Agreement dated April
12, 2006, between
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc. and Lyle E. Jensen
10.22
(11) -- Employment Agreement between
GreenMan Technologies, Inc.
and
Charles E. Coppa
10.23
(19) -- Consulting Agreement between
GreenMan Technologies, Inc.
and
Bruce A. Boland, dated October 1, 2007
10.24
(19) -- Consulting Agreement between
GreenMan Technologies, Inc.
and
John W. Brown, dated October 1, 2007
10.25
(12) -- Promissory note issued November
17, 2000 by GreenMan
Technologies,
Inc. to Dr. Kahn
10.26
(13) -- $100,000 Promissory Note issued
by GreenMan Technologies,
Inc.
to Joyce Ritterhauss dated March 10, 2004
10.27
(9) -- $100,000 Promissory Note by
GreenMan Technologies, Inc. to
Barbara
Morey dated June 26, 2003
10.28
(9) -- $100,000 Promissory Note by
GreenMan Technologies, Inc. to
Barbara
Morey dated August 26, 2003
10.29
(13) -- $100,000 Promissory Note issued
by GreenMan Technologies,
Inc.
to Barbara Morey dated March 18, 2004
10.30
(17) -- $20,260 Unsecured Promissory
Note by GreenMan
Technologies,
Inc. to Barbara Morey dated July 7, 2006
10.31
(17) -- $79,060 Unsecured Promissory
Note by GreenMan
Technologies,
Inc. to Barbara Morey dated July 7, 2006
10.32
(5) -- Subordination Agreement,
dated June 30, 2004, by and among
Barbara
Morey, Joyce Ritterhauss, Allen Kahn, Robert Davis
and
Nancy Davis, in favor of Laurus Master Fund
10.33
(14) -- $100,000 Unsecured Promissory
Note issued by GreenMan
Technologies,
Inc. to Nicholas and Nancy DeBenedictis
dated
January 6, 2006
10.34
(4) -- Subordination Agreement,
dated March 15, 2006 by and among
Nicholas
and Nancy DeBenedictis in favor of Laurus Master
Fund,
Ltd.
10.35
(13) -- Purchase Agreement dated
February 21, 2004 between
GreenMan
Technologies of Minnesota, Inc. and Earl Fisher
10.36
(13) -- Commercial Lease Agreement dated
March 25, 2004 between
GreenMan
Technologies of Minnesota, Inc. and Two Oaks, LLC
10.37
(15) -- Lease Agreement By and Between
WTN Realty Trust to
GreenMan
Technologies of Georgia, Inc. dated April 2, 2001
10.38
(16) -- $750,000 Promissory Note by
GreenMan Technologies, Inc. to
Republic
Services of Georgia, LP dated May 6, 2002
10.39
(4) -- Mutual General Release by
and between GreenMan
Technologies,
Inc. et al. and Republic Services, Inc.
dated
June 30, 2006
10.40
(4) -- $150,000 Promissory Note by
GreenMan Technologies, Inc. to
Republic
Services of Georgia, LP dated June 30, 2006
10.41
(18) -- Letter dated June 22, 2007
between GreenMan Technologies,
Inc.
and Republic Services of Georgia, LP.
10.42
(9) -- Lease - Business Property
agreement dated April 1, 2003
between
GreenMan Technologies of Iowa, Inc. and Maust
Asset
Management, LLC
10.43
(9) -- Guaranty dated September
12, 2003 by GreenMan Technologies,
Inc.
of obligations of GreenMan Technologies of Iowa, Inc.
under
the Lease - Business Property with Maust Asset
Management,
LLC
10.44
(7) -- Lease - Business Property
agreement dated March 1, 2005
between
GreenMan Technologies of Iowa, Inc. and Maust
Asset
Management, LLC
10.45
(7) -- Lease - Motor Vehicle
agreement dated January 1, 2005
between
GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota, Inc. and Maust
Asset
Management, LLC
10.46
(7) -- Lease - Motor Vehicle
agreement dated January 1, 2005
between
GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota, Inc. and Maust
Asset
Management, LLC
10.47
(7) -- Lease - Motor Vehicle
agreement dated January 1, 2005
between
GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota, Inc. and Maust
Asset
Management, LLC
10.48
(17) -- Lease - Motor Vehicle agreement
dated December 29, 2005
between
GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota, Inc. and Maust
Asset
Management, LLC
10.49
(17) -- Lease - Motor Vehicle agreement
dated July 1, 2006 between
GreenMan
Technologies of Minnesota, Inc. and Maust Asset
Management,
LLC
10.50
(17) -- Lease - Motor Vehicle agreement
dated July 1, 2006 between
GreenMan
Technologies of Minnesota, Inc. and Maust Asset
Management,
LLC
10.51
(20) -- Lease - Motor Vehicle agreement
dated October 16, 2006
between
GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota, Inc. and Maust
Asset
Management, LLC
10.52
(17) Release agreement
dated November 30, 2006 between Robert
H.
Davis and GreenMan
21.1
(20) -- List of All
Subsidiaries
31.1
(20) -- Certification of Chief
Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)
or Rule 15d-14(a)
31.2
(20) -- Certification of Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)
or Rule 15d-14(a)
32.1
(20) -- Certification of Chief
Executive Officer under 18 U.S.C.
Section
1350
32.2
(20) -- Certification of Chief
Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C.
Section
1350
----------
(1) Filed
as an Exhibit to GreenMan Technologies, Inc.'s Form 8-K dated
February
17, 2006 and filed March 6, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
(2) Filed
as an Exhibit to GreenMan Technologies, Inc.'s Form 10-QSB for the
Quarter
Ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
(3) Filed
as an Exhibit to GreenMan Technologies, Inc.'s Registration
Statement
on Form SB-2 No. 33-86138 and incorporated herein by reference.
(4) Filed
as an Exhibit to GreenMan Technologies, Inc.'s Form 10-QSB for the
Quarter
Ended June 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
(5) Filed
as an Exhibit to GreenMan Technologies, Inc.'s Registration
Statement
on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-117819), and incorporated herein by
reference.
(6) Filed
as an Exhibit to GreenMan Technologies, Inc.'s Form 8-K dated March
22,
2005 and filed March 28, 2005, and incorporated herein by
reference.
(7) Filed
as an Exhibit to GreenMan Technologies, Inc.'s Form 10-KSB for the
fiscal
year ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
(8) Filed
as an Exhibit to GreenMan Technologies, Inc.'s definitive proxy
statement
dated May 19, 2005 with respect to the Annual meeting held on
June
16, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.
(9) Filed
as an Exhibit to GreenMan Technologies, Inc.'s Form 10-KSB for the
Fiscal
Year Ended September 30, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.
(10) Filed
as an Exhibit to GreenMan Technologies, Inc.'s Form 8-K dated April
12,
2006 and filed April 17, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
(11) Filed
as an Exhibit to GreenMan Technologies, Inc.'s Form 10-QSB for the
Quarter
Ended December 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.
(12) Filed
as an Exhibit to GreenMan Technologies, Inc.'s Form 10-KSB for the
Fiscal
Year Ended September 30, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference.
(13) Filed
as an Exhibit to GreenMan Technologies, Inc.'s Form 10-QSB for the
Quarter
Ended March 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.
(14) Filed
as an Exhibit to GreenMan Technologies, Inc.'s Form 10-QSB/A for
the
Quarter
Ended March 31, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
(15) Filed
as an Exhibit to GreenMan Technologies, Inc.'s Form 10-QSB for the
Quarter
Ended June 30, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference.
(16) Filed
as an Exhibit to GreenMan Technologies, Inc.'s Form 10-QSB for the
Quarter
Ended June 30, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference.
(17) Filed
as an Exhibit to GreenMan Technologies, Inc.'s Form 10-KSB for the
Fiscal
Year Ended September 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
(18) Filed
as an Exhibit to GreenMan Technologies, Inc.'s Form 10-QSB for the
Quarter
Ended June 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
(19) Filed
as an Exhibit to GreenMan Technologies, Inc.'s Form 8-K dated
October
1, 2007 and filed October 5, 2007, and incorporated herein by
reference.
(20) Filed
herewith.
(b) Reports
on Form 8-K.
None
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
In
February 2007 we selected the firm of Schechter, Dokken, Kanter,
Andrews &
Selcer, Ltd. ("SDKAS")as our independent auditors for the fiscal
year
ending
September 30, 2007 and they commenced providing services in
conjunction
with the
quarter ended March 31, 2007. Our former auditors, Wolf and
Company,
P.C. only
provided services in conjunction with the quarter ended December
31,
2006.
In
addition to audit services, SDKAS also provided certain non-audit
services to us
during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007. The Audit
Committee has
considered whether the provision of these additional services is
compatible
with maintaining the independence of SDKAS. Audit Fees. The
aggregate
fees billed
for professional services rendered by SDKAS for (1) the audit of
our
financial
statements as of and for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007
and
(2) the review
of the financial statements included our company's Form 10-QSB
filings for
fiscal 2007 were $120,712. The aggregate fees billed for
professional
services rendered by Wolf & Company, P.C. for the review of the
financial
statements included our company's Form 10-QSB filings for fiscal
2007
were $25,050.
The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by
Wolf &
Company, P.C. for (1) the audit of our financial statements as of and
for
the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2006 and (2) the review of the financial
statements
included in our Form 10-QSB filings for fiscal 2006 were $204,820.
Audit-Related
Fees. The aggregate fees billed in fiscal 2007 for assurance
and related
services rendered by SDKAS that are reasonably related to the
performance of
the audit or review of our financial statements, was $10,828.
Services
rendered in this category consisted of (i) financial accounting and
reporting
consultations, and (ii) participation in board and audit committee
meetings and
(iii) assurance services on specific transactions. The aggregate
fees billed in
fiscal 2007 and 2006 for assurance and related services rendered
by Wolf &
Company, P.C. that are reasonably related to the performance of the
audit or
review of our financial statements, were $0 and $4,300,
respectively.
Services
rendered in this category consisted of (i) financial accounting and
reporting
consultations, and (ii) participation in board and audit committee
meetings and
(iii) assurance services on specific transactions. Tax Fees. The
aggregate fees
billed in fiscal 2007 and 2006 for professional services rendered
by Wolf &
Company, P.C. for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning were
$30,300 and
$26,975, respectively.
All
Other Fees. The aggregate other fees billed during fiscal 2007and
2006
by SDKAS for
the audit of our Company sponsored benefit plan was $11,500 and
$10,500,
respectively. During fiscal 2007 and 2006, the aggregate fees billed
by
Wolf &
Company for products and services provided other than services
reported
above was
$5,750 and $0, respectively.
Pre-Approval
Policies and Procedures. The Audit Committee has adopted
policies which
provide that our independent auditors may only provide those
audit and
non-audit services that have been pre-approved by the Audit
Committee,
subject, with
respect to non-audit services, to a de minimis exception
(discussed
below) and to the following additional requirements: (1) such
services must
not be prohibited under applicable federal securities rules and
regulations,
and (2) the Audit Committee must make a determination that such
services would
be consistent with the principles that the independent auditor
should not
audit its own work, function as part of management, act as an
advocate of
our company, or be a promoter of our company's stock or other
financial
interests. The chairman of the Audit Committee has the authority to
grant
pre-approvals of permitted non-audit services between meetings,
provided
that any such
pre-approval must be presented to the full Audit Committee at its
next scheduled
meeting.
During
fiscal 2007, all of the non-audit services provided by SDKAS were
pre-approved
by the Audit Committee. Accordingly, the Audit Committee did not
rely on the de
minimis exception noted above. This exception waives the
pre-approval
requirements for non-audit services if certain conditions are
satisfied,
including, among others, that such services are promptly brought to
the attention
of and approved by the Audit Committee prior to the completion of
the
audit.
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Index to
Consolidated Financial Statements
Page
----
Reports of
Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firms 25
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2007 and
2006 27
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
September
30, 2007 and
2006 28
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Deficit
for
the Years Ended September 30, 2007 and
2006 29
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
September
30, 2007 and
2006 30
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements 31
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of
Directors and Stockholders
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Savage,
Minnesota
We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
GreenMan
Technologies,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2007 and the related
consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' deficit and cash
flows for the
year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on
these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that
we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not
required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over
financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal
control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that
are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing
an
opinion on the
effectiveness of the company's internal control over financial
reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes
examining,
on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles
used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides
a
reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In
our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly,
in all
material respects, the financial position of GreenMan Technologies,
Inc.
and
subsidiaries as of September 30, 2007 and the results of its operations
and
its cash flows
for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles
generally
accepted in the United States of America.
As
discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements,
effective
October 1,
2006, GreenMan adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123R,
"Share-Based Payment", using the modified prospective method.
/S/
SCHECHTER DOKKEN KANTER ANDREWS & SELCER, LTD.
--------------------------------------------------
SCHECHTER
DOKKEN KANTER ANDREWS & SELCER, LTD.
Minneapolis,
Minnesota
December 31,
2007
25
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of
Directors and Stockholders
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Savage,
Minnesota
We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
GreenMan
Technologies,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006 and the related
consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' deficit and cash
flows for the
year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on
these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that
we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on
a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audit provides
a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly,
in all
material respects, the financial position of GreenMan Technologies,
Inc.
and
subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006 and the results of their
operations
and their cash
flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting
principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
/S/
WOLF & COMPANY, P.C.
-------------------------
WOLF
& COMPANY, P.C.
Boston,
Massachusetts
December 12,
2006.
26
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
September
30, September 30,
2007 2006
------------- -------------
ASSETS
Current
assets:
Cash
and cash equivalents
..................................... $ 376,764 $ 639,014
Accounts
receivable, trade, less allowance for doubtful
accounts
of $268,867 and $185,206 as of September 30,
2007
and September 30, 2006
................................. 2,462,358 2,056,928
Product
inventory
............................................. 157,094 113,336
Other
current assets
.......................................... 764,046 653,423
Assets
related to discontinued operations
..................... -- 7,291
------------- -------------
Total
current assets
....................................... 3,760,262 3,469,992
------------- -------------
Property,
plant and equipment, net
.............................. 5,218,706 5,807,119
------------- -------------
Other
assets:
Customer
relationship intangibles, net
........................ 72,485 85,434
Other
......................................................... 239,750 146,982
------------- -------------
Total
other assets
......................................... 312,235 232,416
------------- -------------
$ 9,291,203 $ 9,509,527
=============
=============
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current
liabilities:
Notes
payable, current
........................................ $ 1,072,117 $ 493,572
Notes
payable, related party, current
......................... -- 30,000
Accounts
payable
.............................................. 1,320,320 1,786,130
Accrued
expenses, other
....................................... 1,579,725 1,549,071
Obligations
under capital leases, current
..................... 185,127 185,940
Obligations
due under lease settlement, current
............... 68,518 --
Deferred
gain on sale leaseback transaction, current
.......... 36,445 36,445
Liabilities
related to discontinued operations
................ 3,018,503 3,414,834
------------- -------------
Total
current liabilities
.................................. 7,280,755 7,495,992
Notes
payable, non-current portion
............................ 10,272,574 10,339,590
Notes
payable, related parties, non-current portion
........... 534,320 534,320
Obligations
under capital leases, non-current portion
......... 1,272,527 1,615,692
Deferred
gain on sale leaseback transaction, non-current
portion
..................................................... 270,298 306,740
Obligations
due under lease settlement, non-current portion
... 580,540 630,000
------------- -------------
Total
liabilities
.......................................... 20,211,014 20,922,334
------------- -------------
Stockholders'
deficit:
Preferred
stock, $1.00 par value, 1,000,000 shares
authorized,
none outstanding
................................ -- --
Common
stock, $.01 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized,
22,880,435
shares and 21,408,966 shares issued and
outstanding
at September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006
.... 228,804 214,089
Additional
paid-in capital
.................................... 35,995,473 35,811,086
Accumulated
deficit
........................................... (47,144,088) (47,437,982)
------------- -------------
Total
stockholders' deficit
................................ (10,919,811) (11,412,807)
------------- -------------
$ 9,291,203 $ 9,509,527
=============
=============
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
27
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
Years
Ended September 30,
2007 2006
------------- -------------
Net sales
..................................................... $ 20,178,726 $ 17,607,812
Cost of sales
................................................. 14,222,158 12,953,753
------------- -------------
Gross profit
.................................................. 5,956,568 4,654,059
Operating
expenses:
Selling,
general and administrative
........................ 3,841,029 3,549,803
------------- -------------
Operating
income from continuing operations
................... 2,115,539 1,104,256
------------- -------------
Other income
(expense):
Interest
and financing expense
............................. (2,006,299) (2,312,071)
Non-cash
interest and financing costs
...................... -- (1,273,014)
Other,
net
................................................. 3,257 301,188
------------- -------------
Other
(expense), net
..................................... (2,003,042) (3,283,897)
------------- -------------
Income (loss)
from continuing operations before income taxes
.. 112,497 (2,179,641)
Provision for
income taxes
.................................... (115,799) (65,337)
------------- -------------
Loss from
continuing operations
............................... (3,302) (2,244,978)
------------- -------------
Discontinued
operations:
Gain
(loss) from discontinued operations
................... 297,196 (1,460,981)
------------- -------------
297,196 (1,460,981)
------------- -------------
Net income
(loss)
............................................. $ 293,894 $ (3,705,959)
=============
=============
Income (loss)
from continuing operations per share-basic
...... $ -- $ (0.11)
Income (loss)
from discontinued operations per share-basic
.... 0.01 (0.08)
------------- -------------
Net income
(loss) per share - basic
........................... $ 0.01 $ (0.19)
=============
=============
Net income
(loss) per share - diluted
......................... $ 0.01 $ (0.19)
=============
=============
Weighted
average shares outstanding - basic
................... 21,766,013 19,810,585
=============
=============
Weighted
average shares outstanding - diluted
................. 26,456,570 19,810,585
=============
=============
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
28
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Deficit
Years
Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006
Additional
Common
Stock Paid
In Accumulated
Shares Amount Capital Deficit Total
---------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------
Balance,
September 30, 2005
............................... 19,225,352 $ 192,253 $
34,853,599 $(43,732,023) $
(8,686,171)
Sale of common
stock
...................................... 550,000 5,500 149,500 -- 155,000
Net value of
warrants issued in conjunction with debt
restructuring
........................................... -- -- 344,155 -- 344,155
Common stock
issued upon conversion of interest and
principal
............................................... 1,268,589 12,686 355,436 -- 368,122
Common stock
issued for fees and expenses due
............. 231,695 2,317 79,729 -- 82,046
Common stock
issued for services rendered
................. 133,330 1,333 28,667 -- 30,000
Net loss for
the year ended September 30, 2006
............ -- -- -- (3,705,959) (3,705,959)
---------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------
Balance,
September 30, 2006
............................... 21,408,966 $ 214,089 $
35,811,086 $(47,437,982) $(11,412,807)
Common stock
issued for fees and expenses due
............. 84,838 849 29,947 -- 30,796
Common stock
issued for services rendered
................. 67,533 675 22,575 -- 23,250
Common stock
issued in connection with lease settlement
... 65,000 650 31,850 -- 32,500
Value of
options issued for services rendered
............. -- -- 11,070 -- 11,070
Common stock
issued on exercise of warrants using
cashless
exercise option
................................ 1,154,098 11,541 (11,541) -- --
Compensation
expense associated with stock options
........ -- -- 66,486 -- 66,486
Sale of common
stock
...................................... 100,000 1,000 34,000 -- 35,000
Net income for
year ended September 30, 2007
.............. -- -- -- 293,894 293,894
---------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------
Balance,
September 30, 2007
............................... 22,880,435 $ 228,804 $
35,995,473 $(47,144,088) $(10,919,811)
========== ========== ============ ============ ============
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
29
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
Years
Ended September 30,
2007 2006
------------- -------------
Cash flows
from operating activities:
Net
income (loss)
........................................... $ 293,894 $ (3,705,959)
Adjustments to
reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating
activities:
Loss
on disposal of property, plant and equipment
........... 6,697 264,543
Gain
recognized on debt restructuring
....................... -- (353,476)
Depreciation
................................................ 1,267,501 1,522,880
Lease
settlement and adjustments
............................ (260,456) --
Amortization
of non-cash financing costs
.................... -- 1,272,874
Amortization
of deferred interest expense
................... 566,508 --
Amortization
of customer relationships
...................... 12,949 12,837
Amortization
of stock option expense
........................ 66,487 --
Gain
on sale leaseback
...................................... (36,442) (36,445)
Value
of warrants issued
.................................... 7,320 --
Common
stock issued for fees, incentives and expenses
....... 84,920 --
Shares
issued for lease settlement
.......................... 32,500 --
Decrease
(increase) in assets:
Accounts
receivable
....................................... (405,430) 1,590,857
Product
inventory
......................................... (43,758) (23,523)
Other
current assets
...................................... (95,457) 145,847
Other
assets
.............................................. (41,200) (84,622)
Increase
(decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts
payable
.......................................... (538,162) (289,603)
Accrued
expenses
.......................................... 170,062 56,712
------------- -------------
Net
cash provided by operating activities
.............. 1,087,933 372,922
------------- -------------
Cash flows
from investing activities:
Purchase
of property and equipment
.......................... (941,075) (1,424,212)
Proceeds
on sale of property and equipment
.................. 7,250 116,000
Proceeds
from equipment held for sale
....................... -- 444,332
------------- -------------
Net
cash used for investing activities
................. (933,825) (863,880)
------------- -------------
Cash flows
from financing activities:
Net
advances under line of credit
........................... -- (619,950)
Proceeds
from notes payable
................................. 596,432 11,692,579
Proceeds
from notes payable, related parties
................ -- 155,000
Repayment
of notes payable
.................................. (782,539) (3,713,644)
Repayment
of notes payable, related parties
................. (30,000) --
Repayment
of convertible notes payable
...................... -- (3,108,257)
Net
(payments) advances on convertible notes payable,
line
of credit, net
........................................ -- (3,585,281)
Principal
payments on obligations under capital leases
...... (200,251) (195,660)
Net
proceeds on the sale of common stock
.................... -- 140,000
------------- -------------
Net
cash (used)provided by financing activities
........ (416,358) 764,787
------------- -------------
Net (decrease)
increase in cash and cash equivalents
........... (262,250) 273,829
Cash and cash
equivalents at beginning of year
................. 639,014 365,216
------------- -------------
Cash and cash
equivalents at end of year, including $0 and
$31,
respectively, of cash related to discontinued
operations
.................................................. $ 376,764 $ 639,045
=============
=============
Supplemental
cash flow information:
Machinery
and equipment acquired under capital leases
........ $ 167,525 $ 535,686
Net
change in capital lease
.................................. 364,000 --
Net
value of warrants issued
................................. -- 344,156
Shares
issued upon conversion of convertible notes
payable,
related party and accrued interest
................ -- 368,121
Shares
issued in lieu of cash for fees, incentives,
expenses
and service rendered
.............................. -- 127,046
Accounts
receivable offset in connection with sale of
discontinued
operations
.................................... -- 152,000
Accounts
payable offset with proceeds on sale of
discontinued
operations
.................................... -- 247,000
Interest
paid
................................................ 1,420,722 1,238,375
Taxes
paid
................................................... 35,300 28,809
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
30
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Notes
To Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of
Presentation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of GreenMan
Technologies,
Inc. and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
In
September 2005, due to the magnitude of continued operating losses,
our
Board of
Directors approved separate plans to divest the operations of our
Georgia and
Tennessee subsidiaries and dispose of their respective assets. In
addition, due
to continuing operation losses, in July 2006 we sold our 100%
ownership
interest in our California subsidiary. Accordingly, we have
classified
all three
respective entities' assets, liabilities and results of operations
as
discontinued
operations for all periods presented in the accompanying
consolidated
financial statements.
Reclassification
Certain
amounts in the 2006 financial statements have been reclassified to
conform to the
2007 presentation.
Nature of
Operations, Risks, and Uncertainties
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries "we", "us" or
"our") was
originally founded in 1992 and has been operated as a Delaware
corporation
since 1995. Today, we comprise two operating locations that
collect,
process and
market scrap tires in whole, shredded or granular form. We are
headquartered
in Savage, Minnesota and currently operate tire processing
operations in
Iowa and Minnesota.
While
we recognized net income during the second half of fiscal 2007, we
have incurred
losses from operations in the prior 18 consecutive quarters. As of
September 30,
2007, we had $376,764 in cash and cash equivalents and a working
capital
deficiency of $3,520,493 of which $3,018,503 or 86% of the total is
associated
with our discontinued Georgia subsidiary. We understand our
continued
existence is
dependent on our ability to generate positive operating cash flow
and achieve
profitable status on a sustained basis and settle existing
obligations.
We believe our efforts to achieve these goals, as evidenced by our
recent two
consecutive profitable quarters and a significant reduction in our
quarterly
losses over the prior four quarters have been positively impacted
by
the June 30,
2006 restructuring of our Laurus Credit facility (see Note 4) and
our
divestiture of historically unprofitable operations during fiscal 2006
and
2005 (see Note
2). However, in the first quarter of fiscal 2009, our principal
payments due
Laurus are scheduled to increase substantially. If we are unable to
obtain
additional financing or restructure our remaining principal payments
with
Laurus, our
ability to maintain our current level of operations could be
materially and
adversely affected and we may be required to adjust our operating
plans
accordingly.
Our
future operating plan focuses on maximizing the performance of
these
two operations
through our continuing efforts to increase overall quality of
revenue
(revenue per passenger tire equivalent) while remaining diligent
with
our ongoing
cost reduction initiatives. We have invested substantial amounts of
capital during
the past several years, including approximately $950,000 in Iowa
during fiscal
2006 in new equipment to increase processing capacity at our Iowa
and Minnesota
locations. As a result, we are currently selling product into
several new,
higher-value markets as evidenced by a 27% increase in end product
revenue during
fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006. We continue to experience
strong demand
for our end products. In addition, we experienced a 2% increase in
overall
tipping fees (fees we are paid to collect and dispose of a scrap
tire)
during fiscal
2007 as compared to the same period during fiscal 2006.
Management
Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and
the amounts of revenues and expenses recorded during the
reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Such
estimates
relate primarily to the estimated lives of property and equipment
other
intangible assets, the valuation reserve on deferred taxes, the value
of
our lease
settlement obligation and the value of equity instruments issued.
The
amount that
may be ultimately realized from assets and liabilities could differ
materially
from the values recorded in the accompanying financial statements
as
of September
30, 2007.
31
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Notes
To Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
In
particular, discontinued operations included management's best
estimate
of the amounts
to be realized and liabilities to be incurred in connection with
the
discontinuing of our Georgia operation. The amounts we may
ultimately
realize could
differ materially from the amounts estimated in arriving at the
loss on
disposal of the discontinued operations.
Cash
Equivalents
Cash
equivalents include short-term investments with original maturities
of three
months or less.
Accounts
Receivable
Accounts
receivable are carried at original invoice amount less an
estimate made
for doubtful accounts. Management determines the allowance for
doubtful
accounts by regularly evaluating past due individual customer
receivables
and considering a customer's financial condition, credit history,
and the
current economic conditions. Individual accounts receivable are
written
off when
deemed uncollectible, with any future recoveries recorded as income
when
received.
Product
Inventory
Inventory
consists primarily of crumb rubber and is valued at the lower of
cost or market
on the first-in first-out (FIFO) method.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property,
plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and
amortization
expense is provided on the straight-line method. Expenditures for
maintenance,
repairs and minor renewals are charged to expense as incurred.
Significant
improvements and major renewals that extend the useful life of
equipment are
capitalized.
Deferred Loan
Costs
Deferred
loan costs are amortized into interest expense over the life of
the related
financing arrangement and represent costs incurred in connection
with financing
at the corporate level and our wholly-owned subsidiary in Iowa.
Revenue
Recognition
We
have two sources of revenue: processing revenue which is earned
from
the
collection, transportation and processing of scrap tires and product
revenue
which is
earned from the sale of tire chips, crumb rubber and steel.
Revenues
from product
sales are recognized when the products are shipped and
collectability
is reasonably assured. Revenues derived from the collection,
transporting
and processing of tires are recognized when processing of the tires
has been
completed.
Income
Taxes
Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are recorded for temporary differences
between the
financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using
the currently
enacted income tax rates expected to be in effect when the taxes
are actually
paid or recovered. A deferred tax asset is also recorded for net
operating loss
and tax credit carry forwards to the extent their realization is
more likely
than not. The deferred tax expense for the period represents the
change in the
net deferred tax asset or liability from the beginning to the end
of the
period.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for
Stock-Based
Compensation", encourages all entities to adopt a fair value based
method of
accounting for employee stock compensation plans, whereby
compensation
cost is
measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is
recognized
over the service period, which is usually the vesting period.
However, SFAS
No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 123(R), discussed below allowed us
until October
1, 2006 to continue to measure compensation cost of those plans
using the
intrinsic value based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting
Principles
Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees",
whereby
compensation cost is the excess, if any, of the quoted market price
of
the stock at
the grant date (or other measurement date) over the amount an
employee must
pay to acquire the stock. Stock options issued under our stock
option plans
generally have no intrinsic value at the grant date, and under
Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25 no compensation cost is recognized
for them. We
apply Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and related
interpretations
in accounting for stock options issued to our employees and
directors. Had
the compensation cost for the stock options issued to our
employees and
directors been determined based on the fair value at the
32
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Notes
To Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
grant dates
consistent with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
123,
the net loss
and net loss per share would have been adjusted to the pro forma
amounts
indicated below:
Year
Ended
September
30, 2006
------------------
Net loss as
reported
........................................ $(3,705,959)
Add:
Compensation recognized under APB No. 25
............... --
Less:
Compensation recognized under FAS 123
................. (12,012)
-----------
Pro forma net
loss
.......................................... $(3,717,971)
===========
Net loss per
share:
Basic
and diluted - as reported
......................... $ (0.19)
===========
Basic
and diluted - pro forma
........................... $ (0.19)
===========
The
fair value of each option grant during the year ended September 30,
2006 under the
2005 Stock Option Plan was estimated on the date of grant using
the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted
average
assumptions;
dividend yield of 0%; risk-free interest rates of approximately
4.9%; expected
volatility ranging from 78% to 103% and expected life of 5 years.
The
fair value of each option grant during the year ended September 30,
2007 under the
2005 Stock Option Plan was estimated on the date of grant using
the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted
average
assumptions;
dividend yield of 0%; risk-free interest rates of approximately
4.6%; expected
volatility ranging from 62% to 78% and expected life of 7.5
years.
Intangible
Assets
In
accordance with SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets"
we
review
intangibles for impairment annually, or more frequently if an event
occurs or
circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the
fair
value of our
intangible assets below their carrying value.
Intangible
assets include customer relationships acquired in current or
past business
acquisitions which are being amortized on a straight-line basis
over a period
of ten to twenty years, commencing on the date of the acquisition.
The impairment
test for customer relationships requires us to review original
relations for
continued retention. Amortization expense associated with customer
relationships
amounted to $12,950 and $12,837 for the fiscal years ended
September 30,
2007 and 2006 respectively. Accumulated amortization was $66,515
and $53,567 at
September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Amortization of
customer
relationships is expected to be $6,950 per year during the next
four
years.
Long-Lived
Assets
In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS")
No. 144,
long-lived assets to be held and used are analyzed for impairment
whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of
an
asset may not
be recoverable. SFAS No. 144 "Accounting for The Impairment or
Disposal of
Long Lived Assets", relates to assets that can be amortized and the
life can be
determinable. We evaluate at each balance sheet date whether events
and
circumstances have occurred that indicate possible impairment. If there
are
indications of
impairment, we use future undiscounted cash flows of the related
asset or asset
grouping over the remaining life in measuring whether the assets
are fully
recoverable. In the event such cash flows are not expected to be
sufficient to
recover the recorded asset values, the assets are written down to
their
estimated fair value. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported
at
the lower of
carrying amount or fair value of asset less the cost to sell.
Net Income
Loss Per Share
Basic
earnings per share represents income available to common
stockholders
divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
during the
period. Diluted earnings per share reflects additional common
shares
that would
have been outstanding if potentially dilutive common shares had
been
issued, as
well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed
conversion.
Potential common shares that may be issued by us relate to
outstanding
stock options and warrants (determined using the treasury stock
method) and
convertible debt. Basic and diluted net loss per share are the same
for the year
ended September 30, 2006, since the effect of the inclusion of all
outstanding
options would be anti-dilutive.
33
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Notes
To Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
New Accounting
Pronouncements
SFAS
123(R) - In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
("FASB")
issued SFAS No. 123(R) (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which is
a
revision of
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No.
123(R)
supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees,
and amends
SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in
SFAS
No. 123(R) is
similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS
No. 123(R)
requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of
employee stock
options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their
fair values.
Pro forma disclosure is not an alternative. SFAS No. 123(R) must be
adopted no
later than the first interim period for fiscal years beginning
after
December 15,
2005. We adopted SFAS No. 123(R) effective on October 1, 2006.
SFAS
No. 123(R) permits public companies to adopt its requirements using
one of two
methods: a "modified prospective" approach or a "modified
retrospective"
approach. Under the modified prospective approach, compensation
cost is
recognized beginning with the effective date based on the
requirements
of SFAS 123(R)
for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and
the
requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) for all awards granted to employees prior
to
the effective
date of SFAS No. 123(R) that remain unvested on the effective
date. The
modified retrospective approach includes the requirements of the
modified
prospective approach but also permits entities to restate based on
the
amounts
previously recognized under SFAS No. 123 for purposes of pro forma
disclosures
either for all prior periods presented or prior interim periods of
the year of
adoption. We have adopted the modified prospective approach.
As
permitted by SFAS No. 123, we currently account for the share-based
payments to
employees using APB Opinion No. 25's intrinsic value method and, as
such,
generally recognizes no compensation cost for employee stock
options.
However,
grants of stock to employees have always been recorded at fair value
as
required under
existing accounting standards. During the fiscal year ended
September 30,
2007 we recorded compensation expense of $66,486 associated with
the adoption
of SFAS No. 123(R). The unamortized compensation costs at September
30, 2007 was
$335,944.
SFAS
No. 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess
of
recognized
compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather
than an
operating cash flow under current accounting literature. Since we do
not
have the
benefit of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation
cost,
because of its
net operating loss position, the change will have no immediate
impact on the
consolidated financial statements.
SFAS
No. 154 - In May 2005, FASB issued SFAS No. 154 "Accounting Changes
and Error
Corrections", to amend Opinion 20 and FASB No. 3 and changes the
requirements
for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting
principle.
This Statement provides guidance on the accounting for and
reporting
of accounting
changes and error corrections. It establishes, unless
impracticable,
retrospective application as the required method for reporting a
change in
accounting principle in the absence of explicit transition
requirements
specific to the newly adopted accounting principle. This Statement
also provides
guidance for determining whether retrospective application of a
change in
accounting principle is impracticable and for reporting a change
when
retrospective
application is impracticable. The correction of an error in
previously
issued financial statements is not an accounting change. However,
the
reporting of
an error correction involves adjustments to previously issued
financial
statements similar to those generally applicable to reporting an
accounting
change retrospectively. Therefore, the reporting of a correction of
an error by
restating previously issued financial statements is also addressed
by this
Statement. The effective date for accounting changes and correction
of
errors made in
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. This
pronouncement
has not had a material effect on our financial statements.
SFAS
No. 155 - In February 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 155, "Accounting
for
Certain Hybrid
Financial Instruments" as an amendment to SFAS No. 133 and 140.
This
Statement:
a.
Permits fair value re-measurement for any hybrid financial
instrument
that
contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require
bifurcation;
b.
Clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are
not
subject
to the requirements of Statement 133;
c.
Establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized
financial
assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives
or
that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded
derivative
requiring bifurcation;
34
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Notes
To Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
d.
Clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of
subordination
are not embedded derivatives; and
e.
Amends Statement 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying
special-purpose
entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that
pertains
to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial
instrument.
This
Statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired or
issued after
the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after
September 15,
2006. The adoption of SFAS 155 has not had a material effect on
our
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
SFAS
No. 157 - In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair
Value
Measurement" ("SFAS 157"). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes
a
framework for
measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements.
SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years
beginning after November 17, 2007 and interim periods within those
fiscal
years. We are
evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 157 on our consolidated
financial
position, results of operations and cash flows.
FIN
No. 48 - In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,
"Accounting
for Uncertain Tax Positions"; an Interpretation of SFAS No. 109
("FIN 48"),
which clarifies the criteria for recognition and measurement of
benefits from
uncertain tax positions. Under FIN 48, an entity should recognize
a tax benefit
when it is "more-likely-than-not", based on the technical merits,
that the
position would be sustained upon examination by a taxing authority.
The
amount to be
recognized, given the "more likely than not" threshold was passed,
should be
measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than
50
percent likely
of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing
authority that
has full knowledge of all relevant information. Furthermore, any
change in the
recognition, derecognition or measurement of a tax position should
be recognized
in the interim period in which the change occurs. The adoption of
FIN 48 has not
had a material effect on our consolidated financial position or
results of
operations.
Sarbanes-Oxley
Section 404 - The Securities and Exchange Commission issued
two releases
on August 6, 2006 to grant smaller public companies and many
foreign
private issuers further relief from compliance with Section 404 of
the
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. The Commission is proposing to grant relief to
smaller public
companies by extending the date by which non-accelerated filers
must start
providing a report by management assessing the effectiveness of the
company's
internal control over financial reporting. The initial compliance
date
for these
companies would be moved from fiscal years ending on or after July
15,
2007, until
fiscal years ending on or after Dec. 15, 2007. The Commission also
proposes to
extend the date by which non-accelerated filers must begin to
comply
with the
Section 404(b) requirement to provide an auditor's attestation
report
on internal
control over financial reporting in their annual reports. This
deadline would
be moved to the first annual report for a fiscal year ending on
or after Dec.
15, 2008. This proposed extension would result in all
non-accelerated
filers being required to complete only the management's portion
of the
internal control requirements in their first year of compliance with
the
requirements.
This proposal is intended to provide cost savings and efficiency
opportunities
to smaller public companies and to assist them as they prepare to
comply fully
with Section 404's reporting requirements. This proposed extension
will provide
these issuers and their auditors an additional year to consider,
and adapt to,
the changes in Auditing Standard No. 5 that the Commission and the
Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board intend to make, as well as the
guidance for
management the Commission intends to issue, to improve the
efficiency of
the Section 404(b) auditor attestation report process.
2. Discontinued
Operations
Due
to the magnitude of the continuing operating losses incurred by our
Georgia ($3.4
million) and Tennessee ($1.8 million) subsidiaries during fiscal
2005 and our
California ($3.2 million since inception) subsidiary, in fiscal
2006 our Board
of Directors determined it to be in the best interest of our
company to
discontinue all southeastern and west coast operations and dispose
of
their
respective operating assets.
During
fiscal 2006 we recognized approximately $126,000 of income from
discontinued
Tennessee operations as a result of a reduction in certain plant
closure
accruals and an agreement with our former Tennessee landlord and
the
recognition of
$70,000 associated with insurance credits.
35
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Notes
To Consolidated Financial Statements
2. Discontinued
Operations - (Continued)
In
September 2005, we adopted a plan to dispose of all Georgia
operations
and during the
quarter ended December 31, 2005, we substantially curtailed
operations at
our Georgia subsidiary. We completed the divestiture of all
Georgia
operating assets as of March 1, 2006. The aggregate net losses
incurred
during fiscal
2006 associated with our discontinued Georgia operation was
approximately
$582,000.
During
the year ended September 30, 2007 we received credits from vendors,
we recovered
certain bad debts and we reduced certain accrued expenses which
offset a
$19,058 increase in our lease settlement reserve (see discussion of
our
Georgia lease
below) resulting in approximately $297,000 of income from
discontinued
Georgia operations.
In
July 2006 we sold our California subsidiary to a third party for
$1,000. The
aggregate net losses including the loss on disposal associated with
the
discontinued operations of our California subsidiary included in the
results
of operations
for year ended September 30, 2006 were approximately $1,005,000
and $3.2
million since inception.
In
February 2006, we sold and assigned to Tires Into Recycled Energy
and
Supplies, Inc.
("TIRES"), a leading crumb rubber processor in the United States,
certain
assets, including (a) certain truck tire processing equipment located
at
our Georgia
facility; (b) certain rights and interests in our contracts with
suppliers of
scrap truck tires; and (c) certain intangible assets. TIRES assumed
all of our
rights and obligations under these contracts. In return we received
$155,000 in
cash proceeds; allowed TIRES to retain 127,389 shares of our common
stock
previously issued in conjunction a terminated December 2004 letter
of
intent and
exclusive option and agreed to terminate all other agreements
executed
between the parties. In addition, TIRES entered into a sublease
agreement with
us with respect to part of the premises located in Georgia. As
additional
consideration, TIRES terminated several material supply agreements
and a December
2005 letter of intent containing an exclusive option to acquire
certain
operating assets of TIRES.
In
March 2006, we sold and assigned to MTR of Georgia, Inc. ("MTR"), a
company
co-owned by a former employee, certain assets, including (a)
certain
passenger tire
processing equipment located at our Georgia facility; (b) certain
rights and
interests in our contracts with suppliers of scrap passenger tires;
and (c)
certain intangible assets. MTR assumed all of our rights and
obligations
under these
contracts. In addition, MTR entered into a sublease agreement with
us with
respect to part of the premises located in Georgia. We received
$250,000
from MTR for
these assets. As additional consideration, MTR assumed financial
responsibility
for disposing of all scrap tires and scrap tire processing
residual at
the Georgia facility as of the closing of this sale.
We
agreed with TIRES and MTR not to compete in the business of
providing
whole tire
waste disposal services or selling crumb rubber material (except to
our existing
customers) within certain Southeastern states for a period of three
years.
In
February 2006, we amended our Georgia lease agreement to obtain the
right to
terminate the original lease, which had a remaining term of
approximately
15 years, by providing the landlord with six months notice. In the
event of
termination, we will be obligated to continue to pay rent until the
earlier to
occur of (1) the sale by the landlord of the premises; (2) the date
on which a new
tenant takes over; or (3) three years from the date on which we
vacate the
property. As a result of the amendment and our decision to dispose
of
our Georgia
operations, we wrote off the unamortized balance of $1,427,053
associated
with the leased land and buildings and improvements as a cost of
disposal of
discontinued operations at September 30, 2005. This loss was
partially
offset by a $586,137 gain on settlement of the remaining capital
lease
obligations
due and is included in the loss on disposal of discontinued
operations at
September 30, 2005. In addition, on August 28, 2006 we received
notice from
the Georgia landlord indicating that the Georgia subsidiary was in
default under
the lease due to its insolvent financial condition. The landlord
agreed to
waive the default in return for $75,000 fee to be paid upon
termination of
the lease and required that all current and future rights and
obligations
under the lease be assigned to GreenMan Technologies, Inc. pursuant
to a March 29,
2001 guaranty agreement. The $75,000 is included in loss from
discontinued
operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 and is
included in
Obligations due under lease settlement at September 30, 2007.
In
July 2006 we sold our California subsidiary to a third party for
$1,000.
GreenMan Technologies of California, was formed in 2002 to acquire
all
of the
outstanding common stock of Unlimited Tire Technologies, Inc. an
Azusa,
California
scrap tire recycling company of which the third party was the
majority
owner. The aggregate net losses including the loss on disposal
associated
with the discontinued operations of our California subsidiary
included in
the results of operations for year ended September 30, 2006 were
approximately
$1,005,000.
36
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Notes
To Consolidated Financial Statements
2. Discontinued
Operations - (Continued)
The
major classes of assets and liabilities associated with
discontinued
operations
were:
September
30, September 30,
2007 2006
------------- -------------
Assets related
to discontinued operations:
Cash
..................................................... $ -- $ 31
Other
current assets
..................................... -- 7,260
------------- -------------
Total
current
.......................................... -- 7,291
Property,
plant and equipment (net)
...................... -- --
Other
.................................................... -- --
------------- -------------
Total
non-current
...................................... -- --
------------- -------------
Total
assets related to discontinued operations
........ $ -- $ 7,291
=============
=============
Liabilities
related to discontinued operations:
Accounts
payable
......................................... $ 2,502,779 $ 2,575,134
Notes
payable, current
................................... 357,340 394,887
Accrued
expenses, other
.................................. 107,115 118,019
Capital
leases, current
.................................. 51,269 326,795
------------- -------------
Total
current
.......................................... 3,018,503 3,414,834
Total
liabilities related to discontinued operations
... $ 3,018,503 $ 3,414,834
=============
=============
Net
sales and (loss) from discontinued operations were as follows:
September
30, September 30,
2007 2006
------------- -------------
Net sales from
discontinued operations
....... $ -- $ 2,885,019
Income (loss)
from discontinued operations
... 297,196 (1,460,981)
3. Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property,
plant and equipment consists of the following:
September
30, September
30, Estimated
2007 2006 Useful
Lives
------------- ------------- ------------
Buildings and
improvements
....................... $ 1,384,028 $ 1,741,943 10
- 20 years
Machinery and
equipment
.......................... 7,379,405 7,188,119 5
- 10 years
Furniture and
fixtures
........................... 15,147 164,025 3
- 5 years
Motor vehicles
................................... 3,928,089 3,586,457 3
- 10 years
------------- -------------
12,706,669 12,680,544
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
... (7,487,963) (6,873,425)
------------- -------------
Property,
plant and equipment, net
............... $ 5,218,706 $ 5,807,119
=============
=============
During
March 2004, our Minnesota subsidiary sold all of its land and
buildings to
an entity co-owned by an officer for $1,400,000, realizing a gain
of $437,337
which has been recorded as unearned income and classified as a non
current
liability in the accompanying financial statements. Simultaneous
with
the sale, we
entered into an agreement to lease the property back for a term of
12 years at an
annual rent of $195,000, increasing to $227,460 over the term of
the lease. The
gain will be recognized as income ratably over the term of the
lease. The
building portion of the lease has been classified as a capital
lease
and the land
portion has been classified as an operating lease. The lease
provides for
two additional 4-year extensions. We used $875,000 of the proceeds
to repay an
existing mortgage on the property.
Depreciation
and amortization expense for the fiscal years ended September
30, 2007 and
2006 was $1,267,501 and $1,522,880 respectively, including
depreciation
and amortization from discontinued operations of $213,689 for the
year ended
September 30, 2006.
37
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Notes
To Consolidated Financial Statements
4. Credit
Facility/Notes Payable
Republic
Services of Georgia
On
May 6, 2002 we issued Republic Services of Georgia, LP ("RSLP") a
$743,750 10%
promissory note due in March 2007. On July 31, 2005, RSLP agreed to
defer all
interest and principal payments due, including nine existing
past-due
payments
totaling $76,042 through June 2006 at which time all past due
interest
and principal
payments under the May 6, 2002 promissory note was to be
incorporated
into an a new 10% promissory note, payable in 48 monthly
installments
commencing July 2006.
On
June 30, 2006 we reached an agreement with RSLP in which in return
for
a payment of
$250,000 and the issuance of a $150,000 unsecured promissory note,
RSLP agreed to
forgo all remaining amounts due under the revised May 6, 2002
promissory
note totaling $766,355 at June 30, 2006. The settlement was
characterized
as a troubled debt restructuring and as a result, we realized a
gain on
restructuring of $353,476 during the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
The
note bears
interest at 10% and was payable in 11 monthly installments of
$5,000
with the
remaining balance due June 30, 2007. On June 22, 2007, RSLP agreed
to
accept the
remaining balance of $107,879 in seven equal payments of $15,411
commencing
June 30, 2007. The balance due RSLP at September 30, 2007 was
$46,234.
June 2006
Laurus Credit Facility
On
June 30, 2006, we entered into a $16 million amended and restated
credit
facility with Laurus (the "New Credit Facility"). The New Credit
Facility
consists of a
$5 million non-convertible secured revolving note and an $11
million
secured non-convertible term note. Unlike the terms of our prior
credit
facility with
Laurus, the New Credit Facility is not convertible into shares of
our common
stock.
Our
obligations under the New Credit Facility are secured by first
priority
security interests in all of the assets of our company and all of
the
assets of our
GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota, Inc. and GreenMan Technologies
of Iowa, Inc.
subsidiaries, as well as by pledges of the capital stock of those
subsidiaries.
We expect to grant Laurus additional security interest in the
assets of
Welch Products and its subsidiaries, and believe that the grant of
those security
interests will increase our borrowing base under the term note
described
above (See Note 14).
The
revolving note has a three-year term from the closing, bears
interest
on any
outstanding amounts at the prime rate plus 2% (9.75% at September
30,
2007), with a
minimum rate of 8%. Amounts advanced under the line are limited to
90% of
eligible accounts receivable and 50% of finished goods inventory,
as
defined up to
a maximum of $5 million, subject to certain limitations. As of
September 30,
2007 the revolving note has a zero balance.
The
term loan has a maturity date of June 30, 2009 and bears interest
at
the prime rate
plus 2% (9.75% at September 30, 2007), with a minimum rate of 8%.
Interest on
the term loan is payable monthly commencing August 1, 2006.
Principal is
to be amortized over the term of the loan, commencing on July 2,
2007, with
minimum monthly payments of principal as follows: (i) for the
period
commencing on
July 2, 2007 through June 2008, minimum principal payments of
$150,000; (ii)
for the period from July 2008 through June 2009, minimum
principal
payments of $400,000; and (iii) the balance of the principal will
be
payable on the
maturity date. In May 2007, Laurus agreed to reduce the principal
payments
required during the period of July 2007 to September 2008 to
$100,000
per month and
defer the difference of $1,500,000 to the June 2009 maturity date.
In addition,
we have agreed to make an excess cash flow repayment as follows: no
later than
ninety-five days following the end of each fiscal year beginning
with
the fiscal
year ending on September 30, 2007, we have agreed to make a payment
equal to 50%
of (a) the aggregate net operating cash flow generated for such
fiscal year
less (b) aggregate capital expenditures made in such fiscal year
(up
to a maximum
of 25% of the net operating cash flow calculated in accordance with
this clause).
The term loan may be prepaid at any time without penalty. We used
approximately
$8,503,000 of the term note proceeds to repay our outstanding
indebtedness
under our prior credit facility with Laurus, approximately
$1,219,000 to
repay in full the indebtedness due our Iowa subsidiary's former
primary lender
First American Bank, $250,000 to pay RSLP as part of a settlement
agreement (as
described above) and approximately $888,000 to pay costs and fees
associated
with this transaction which were expensed at June 30, 2006.
Subject
to applicable cure periods, amounts borrowed under the New Credit
Facility are
subject to acceleration upon certain events of default, including:
(i) any
failure to pay when due any amount we owe under the New Credit
Facility;
(ii) any
material breach by us of any other covenant made to Laurus; (iii)
any
misrepresentation,
in any material respect, made by us to Laurus in the
documents
governing the New Credit Facility; (iv) the institution of certain
bankruptcy and
insolvency proceedings by or against us; (v) the entry of certain
monetary
judgments greater than $50,000 against us that are not paid or
vacated
for a period
of 30 business days; (vi) suspensions of trading of our common
stock; (vii)
any failure to deliver shares of common stock upon exercise of the
warrant;
(viii) certain defaults under agreements related to any of our
other
indebtedness;
and (ix) changes of control of our company. Substantial fees and
penalties are
payable to Laurus in the event of a default.
In
connection with the New Credit Facility, we issued Laurus a warrant
to
purchase up to
an aggregate of 3,586,429 shares of our common stock at an
exercise price
equal to $0.01 per share. This warrant, valued at $1,116,927, is
immediately
exercisable, has a term of ten years, allows for cashless exercise
at the option
of Laurus, and does not contain any "put" provisions. Previously
38
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Notes
To Consolidated Financial Statements
4. Credit
Facility/Notes Payable - (Continued)
issued
warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,380,000 shares of our common
stock, which
were issued in connection with the original notes on June 30, 2004,
were canceled
as part of this transaction. The amount of our common stock Laurus
may hold at
any given time is limited to no more than 4.99% of our outstanding
common stock.
This limitation may be waived by Laurus upon 61 days notice to us
and does not
apply if an event of default occurs and is continuing under the New
Credit
Facility. The fair value of these terminated warrants was determined
to
be $31,774 and
offset the value of the new warrant issued. In addition, the fair
value
associated with the foregone convertibility feature of all previous
convertible
amounts was determined to be $740,998 and also offset the value of
the new
warrant issued. As a result of the foregoing, the net value assigned
to
the new
warrant of $344,155 was recorded as paid in capital and recorded as
a
reduction to
the carrying value of the refinanced note as described below.
Laurus
has agreed that it will not, on any trading day, be permitted to
sell any
common stock acquired upon exercise of this warrant in excess of 10%
of
the aggregate
numbers of shares of the common stock traded on such trading day.
On January 25,
2007 we filed a registration statement under the Securities Act
of 1933
relating to the 3,586,429 shares underlying the June 30, 2006 warrant
as
well as
553,997 shares issuable to another shareholder upon exercise of a
warrant. The
registration statement was declared effective on February 6, 2007.
On June 29,
2007, Laurus acquired 223,117 shares of our common stock upon the
partial
exercise of its warrant on a cashless basis. Pursuant to Statement
of
Financial
Accounting Standards No. 15, "Accounting by Debtors and Creditors
for
Troubled Debt
Restructuring" ("SFAS 15") the New Credit Facility has been
accounted for
as a troubled debt restructuring. It was determined that, because
the effective
interest rate of the New Credit Facility was lower than that of
the previous
credit facility therefore indicating a concession was granted by
Laurus, we are
viewed as a passive beneficiary of the restructuring, and no new
transaction
has occurred. Under SFAS 15, a modification of terms "is neither an
event that
results in a new asset or liability for accounting purposes nor an
event that
requires a new measurement of an existing asset or liability."
Thus,
from a
debtor's standpoint, SFAS 15 calls for a modification of the terms of
a
loan to be
accounted for prospectively. As a result, unamortized balances of
$258,900 of
deferred financing fees and $972,836 of debt discount and
beneficial
conversion
features associated with the previous Laurus credit facility were
netted along
with the value of the new warrants issued of $344,155 against the
new term debt
related to the portion of the new debt that refinanced the Laurus
debt and
related accrued interest totaling $8,503,416 to provide a net
carrying
amount for
that portion of the debt of $6,927,525. The carrying amount of the
loan will be
amortized over the term of the loan at a constant effective
interest rate
of 20% applied to the future cash payments specified by the new
loan.
September
30, September 30,
Notes payable
consists of the following
at: 2007 2006
------------- -------------
Term note
payable, Republic Services of Georgia, LP, unsecured, due in 3
monthly
installments
of $15,411 with the remaining balance due December 31, 2007
................. 46,234 147,879
Term note
payable, Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., due in monthly installments of
$100,000
plus
interest at prime plus 2% (7.75% at September 30, 2007) through
September
30,
2008 followed by 12 monthly principal payments of $400,000 plus
interest
with
the remaining balance due June 2009
................................................. 9,821,748 9,424,109
Term note
payable, State of Iowa, secured by certain assets of GreenMan of Iowa,
due
in
quarterly installments of $8,449 including interest at 1.5% with the
remaining
principal
balance due November 2012
...................................................... 189,736 220,506
Term note
payable, State of Iowa, secured by certain assets of GreenMan of Iowa,
due
in
32 quarterly installments of $6,920 including interest at 3% through October
2012
..... 128,084 151,483
Term note
payable, State of Iowa, secured by certain assets of GreenMan of Iowa,
due
in
28 quarterly installments of $16,469 including interest at 2% through July 2013
....... 391,794 449,686
Other term
notes payable and assessments, secured by various equipment with
interest
rates
ranging from 0% to 13.33% and requiring monthly installments from $639 to $5,490
... 767,095 439,499
------------- -------------
11,344,691 10,833,162
Less current
portion
....................................................................... (1,072,117) (493,572)
------------- -------------
Notes
payable, non-current portion
....................................................... $ 10,272,574 $ 10,339,590
=============
=============
The
following is a summary of maturities of carrying values of all
notes
payable at
September 30, 2007:
Years
Ending September 30,
--------------------------
2008
........................................ $
1,072,117
2009
........................................ 9,419,778
2010
........................................ 258,536
2011........................................ 213,499
2012
........................................ 261,131
2013
and
thereafter......................... 119,630
-----------
$11,344,691
===========
39
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Notes
To Consolidated Financial Statements
4. Credit
Facility/Notes Payable - (Continued)
The
carrying value of the Laurus debt under the New Credit Facility at
September 30,
2007 was $9,821,748 and does not equate to the total cash payments
due under the
debt as a result of accounting for a troubled debt restructure.
The following
is a summary of the cash maturities of the Laurus debt:
Twelve
Months Ending September 30,
----------------------------------
2008
........................................ $
1,200,000
2009
........................................ 9,500,000
-----------
$10,700,000
===========
Interest
expense on the lines of credit and notes payable for the years
ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 amounted to $2,006,299 and $1,187,870
respectively.
5. Notes
Payable - Related Party
Note Payable -
Related Party
In
November 2000, we borrowed $200,000 from a director under an
unsecured
promissory
note which bore interest at 12% per annum with interest due monthly
and the
principal originally due in November 2001. The director agreed to
extend
the maturity
date several times and on August 24, 2006, agreed to convert the
$200,000 of
principal and $76,445 of accrued interest into 953,259 of
unregistered
shares of common stock at a price of $.29 per share which was the
closing price
of our stock on the date of conversion.
Between
June and August 2003, two immediate family members of an officer
loaned us a
total of $400,000 under the terms of two-year, unsecured promissory
notes which
bear interest at 12% per annum with interest due quarterly and the
principal due
upon maturity. In March 2004, these same individuals loaned us an
additional
$200,000 in aggregate, under similar terms with the principal due
upon maturity
March 2006. These individuals each agreed to invest the entire
$100,000
principal balance of their June 2003 notes ($200,000 in aggregate)
into
our April 2004
private placement of investment units and each received 113,636
units in these
transactions. In addition, the two individuals agreed to extend
the maturity
of the remaining balance of these notes, $400,000 at September 30,
2006 until the
earlier of when all amounts due under the Laurus credit facility
have been
repaid or June 30, 2009. (see Note 4).
In
September 2003, a former officer loaned us $400,000 under a
September
30, 2003
unsecured promissory note which bore interest at 12% per annum. In
2006
he agreed to
extend the maturity of the remaining balance of this note until the
earlier of
when all amounts due under the Laurus credit facility have been
repaid or June
30, 2009. In July 2006, the former officer assigned the remaining
balance of
$99,320 as follows: $79,060 to one of an officer's immediate family
members noted
above and the remaining balance of $20,260 plus accrued interest
of $13,500 to
the officer.
Between
January and June 2006, a director loaned us $155,000 under three
unsecured
promissory notes which bear interest at 10% per annum with interest
and principal
due during periods ranging from June 30, 2006 through September
30, 2006. On
April 12, 2006, the director agreed in lieu of being repaid in cash
at maturity to
convert $76,450 (including interest of $1,450) into 273,035
shares of
unregistered common stock at a price of $.28 which was the closing
price of our
stock on the date of conversion. In addition, on June 5, 2006 the
director
agreed to convert $15,226 (including interest of $226) into 42,295
shares of
unregistered common stock at a price of $.36 which was the closing
price of our
stock on the date of conversion. During the year ended of September
30, 2007 the
director was repaid $30,000 and agreed to extend the remaining
$35,000 until
the earlier of when all amounts due under the restructured Laurus
credit
facility have been repaid or June 30, 2009.
The
following is a summary of maturities of all related party notes
payable at
September 30, 2007:
Years
Ending September 30,
--------------------------
2008
........................................ $ --
2009........................................ 534,320
--------
$534,320
========
Total
interest expense for related party notes amounted to $63,422 and
$85,612, for
the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Total accrued
interest due related parties amounted to $101,653 and $86,229 at
September 30,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
40
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Notes
To Consolidated Financial Statements
6. Capital
Leases
We
lease various facilities and equipment under capital lease
agreements
with terms
ranging from 36 months to 240 months and requiring monthly payments
ranging from
$479 to $16,250. Assets acquired under capital leases with an
original cost
of $2,869,661 and $3,066,136 and related accumulated amortization
of $1,415,217
and $1,257,455 are included in property, plant and equipment at
September 30,
2007 and 2006, respectively. Amortization expense for the years
ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 amounted to $157,762 and $240,488
respectively.
In
March 2004, our Minnesota subsidiary leased back their property from
a
company
co-owned by an employee under a twelve-year lease requiring an
annual
rental of
$195,000, increasing to $227,460 over the term of the lease. The
lease
can be renewed
for two additional four-year periods. The building lease has been
classified as
a capital lease with a value of $1,036,000 and the portion
allocated to
the land has been treated as an operating lease (See Note 3).
In
February 2006, we amended our Georgia lease agreement to obtain the
right to
terminate the original lease, which had a remaining term of
approximately
15 years, by providing the landlord with six months notice. In the
event of
termination, we will be obligated to continue to pay rent until the
earlier to
occur of (1) the sale by the landlord of the premises; (2) the date
on which a new
tenant takes over; or (3) three years from the date on which we
vacate the
property. As a result of the amendment and our decision to dispose
of
our Georgia
operations, we wrote off the unamortized balance of $1,427,053
associated
with the leased land and buildings and improvements as a cost of
disposal of
discontinued operations at September 30, 2005. This loss was
partially
offset by a $586,137 gain on settlement of the remaining capital
lease
obligations
due and is included in the loss on disposal of discontinued
operations at
September 30, 2005. In addition, on August 28, 2006 we received
notice from
the Georgia landlord indicating that the Georgia subsidiary was in
default under
the lease due to its insolvent financial condition. The landlord
agreed to
waive the default in return for $75,000 fee to be paid upon
termination of
the lease and required that all current and future rights and
obligations
under the lease be assigned to GreenMan Technologies, Inc. pursuant
to a March 29,
2001 guaranty agreement. The $75,000 is included in loss from
discontinued
operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 and is
included in
Obligations due under lease settlement at September 30, 2007.
During
fiscal 2006, we entered into four capital lease agreements with
Maust Asset
Management, a company co-owned by one of our employees for
equipment
valued at
$423,038. Under the terms of the leases we are required to pay
between
$2,543 and
$4,285 per month rental for a period of 60 months from inception.
We
have the
ability to purchase the equipment at the end of each lease for
prices
ranging from
$11,250 to $15,000 per unit.
During
fiscal 2007, we entered into a new capital lease agreements with
Maust Asset
Management for equipment valued at $64,719. We are required to pay
$1,614 per
month rental and have the ability to purchase the equipment at the
end of the
lease for $8,512.
Years
Ending
September
30,
-------------
2008
.................................... $ 341,752
2009.................................... 345,588
2010.................................... 340,560
2011.................................... 293,768
2012.................................... 181,063
2013
and
thereafter..................... 589,093
----------
Total
minimum lease payments
................ 2,091,824
Less
amount representing interest
........... (634,170)
----------
Present
value of minimum lease payments
..... $1,457,655
==========
For
the years ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, interest expense on
capital leases
amounted to $76,796 and $168,143, respectively.
7. Commitments
and Contingencies
Management
Changes
On
April 12, 2006, our Board of Directors named Lyle E. Jensen as
President and
Chief Executive Officer succeeding Robert H. Davis, who resigned
those
positions, and resigned as a member of our Board of Directors, on the
same
day. Mr.
Jensen has been a member of our Board of Directors since May 2002,
and
previously
served as the Chair of the Board's Audit Committee and as member of
the Board's
Compensation Committee. Mr. Jensen remains a member of the Board of
Directors, but
no longer serves on these committees. Nicholas DeBenedictis, an
outside
Director has joined the Compensation Committee and will serve as
Audit
Committee
Chair.
41
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Notes
To Consolidated Financial Statements
7. Commitments
and Contingencies - (Continued)
We
entered into a five-year employment agreement with Mr. Jensen
pursuant
to which Mr.
Jensen receives a base salary of $195,000 per year. The agreement
automatically
renews for one additional year upon each anniversary, unless
notice of
non-renewal is given by either party. The agreement may be
terminated
without cause
on thirty days' notice but provides for payment of twelve months'
salary and
certain benefits as a severance payment for termination without
cause. The
agreement also provides for incentive compensation based on the
attainment of
certain financial and non-financial goals. Mr. Jensen also
received a
relocation allowance of $23,603 and a car allowance of $600 per
month. Mr.
Jensen has been granted a qualified option under our 2005 Stock
Option Plan to
purchase 500,000 shares of the our common stock, par value $.01
per share,
with an exercise price of $.28 per share which was the closing
price
of our stock
on the date of grant. In addition, upon signing of his employment
agreement, Mr.
Jensen purchased 500,000 unregistered shares of our common stock
at $.28 per
share which was the closing bid price of the common stock on the
date the
agreement was executed. In conjunction with Mr. Davis's resignation,
we
agreed to the
payment of salary and certain benefits for a subsequent twelve
month period
which aggregate approximately $300,000 pursuant to certain
contractual
obligations. As of September 30, 2007 all amounts due Mr. Davis
have
been
paid.
In
addition, based on the intended sale of our California subsidiary
(see
Note 2),
notice of termination was provided to our California vice president
on
June 30,2006
and we agreed to the payment of salary and certain benefits for a
subsequent
twelve month period which aggregate approximately $97,000 pursuant
to
certain
contractual obligations. As of September 30, 2007 all amounts due
have
been
paid.
Employment
Agreements
We
have employment agreements with three (including Mr. Jensen) of our
corporate
officers, which provide for base salaries, participation in
employee
benefit
programs and severance payments for termination without cause.
Rental
Agreements
Our
Iowa subsidiary leases a facility located on approximately 4 acres
of
land under a
10-year lease commencing in April 2003 from Maust Asset Management
Company, LLC
("Maust Asset Management"), a company co-owned by one of our
employees.
Under the terms of the lease, monthly rental payments of $8,250 on
a
triple net
basis are required for the first five years increasing to $9,000 on
a
triple net
basis per month for the remaining five years. The lease also
provides
a right of
first refusal to purchase the land and buildings at fair market
value
during the
term of the lease. Maust Asset Management acquired the property
from
the former
lessor. In April 2005, our Iowa subsidiary entered into an
eight-year
lease
agreement with Maust Asset Management for approximately 3 acres
adjacent
to our
existing Iowa facility at monthly rent payments of $3,500.
We
leased approximately 4,500 square feet of office space from an
unrelated
third party for our corporate headquarters pursuant to a five-year
lease that
expired in May 2008. In conjunction with the relocation of
corporate
headquarters
from Massachusetts to Minnesota we terminated our lease for our
former
headquarters effective November 1, 2006. In return for the
termination,
we gave our
landlord $50,000 and 65,000 shares of our common stock (valued at
$32,500) and
we remained in the existing space through December 31, 2006. As a
result of
settlement, we recorded a lease settlement expense of $54,360 at
September 30,
2006. In addition, as part of the settlement agreement, the
landlord
agreed to provide us with approximately 1,100 square feet of office
space for 12
months commencing January 1, 2007 at no cost (valued at $15,000).
In December
2007 the landlord agreed to a tenant-at-will agreement for existing
space on
rolling six month basis at $1,250 per month.
For
the years ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, total rental expense
in
connection
with all non-cancellable real estate leases amounted to $401,649
and
$219,840,
respectively including $318,450 per year associated with
related-party
leases.
We
also rent various vehicles and equipment from third parties under
non-cancellable
operating leases with monthly rental payments ranging from
$1,500 to
$2,683 and with terms ranging from 38 to 47 months. In addition, we
rent several
pieces of equipment on a monthly basis from a company co-owned by
an employee at
monthly rentals ranging from $263 to $1,295. In January 2005, we
entered into
three new equipment lease agreements with Maust Asset Management in
which we are
required to pay between $1,500 and $2,683 per month rental and have
the ability to
purchase the equipment at the end of the lease for between
$12,000 and
$16,000.
42
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Notes
To Consolidated Financial Statements
7. Commitments
and Contingencies - (Continued)
For
the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, total rent
expense
in connection
with non-cancellable operating vehicle and equipment leases
amounted to
$68,199 and $68,837, respectively, of which, $68,199 and $68,199
were to
related parties. The total future minimum rental commitment at
September
30, 2007 under
the above operating leases are as follows:
Year ending
September
30: Real
Estate Equipment Total
----------- ---------- ----------
2008
................................. $ 198,228 $ 49,416 $ 247,644
2009
................................. 204,756 6,000 210,756
2010
................................. 204,756 -- 204,756
2011
................................. 204,756 -- 204,756
2012
................................. 206,948 -- 206,948
2013
and thereafter
.................. 295,317 -- 295,317
----------- ---------- ----------
$
1,314,761 $ 55,416 $1,370,177
===========
========== ==========
Litigation
As
of September 30, 2007, approximately seventeen vendors of our
GreenMan
Technologies
of Georgia, Inc. and GreenMan Technologies of Tennessee, Inc.
subsidiaries
had commenced legal action, primarily in the state courts of
Georgia, in
attempts to collect approximately $1.9 million of past due amounts,
plus accruing
interest, attorneys' fees, and costs, all relating to various
services
rendered to these subsidiaries. These amounts are included in
liabilities
related to discontinued operations at September 30, 2007. The
largest
individual claim is for approximately $650,000. As of September 30,
2007, eight
vendors had secured judgments in their favor against GreenMan
Technologies
of Georgia, Inc. for an aggregate of approximately $661,000. As
previously
noted, all of GreenMan Technologies of Tennessee, Inc.'s assets
were
sold in
September 2005 and substantially all of GreenMan Technologies of
Georgia,
Inc.'s assets were sold as of March 1, 2006. All proceeds from
these
sales were
retained by our secured lender and these subsidiaries have no
substantial
assets. We are therefore currently evaluating the alternatives
available to
these subsidiaries.
Although
GreenMan Technologies, Inc. was not a party to any of these
vendor
relationships, three of the plaintiffs have named GreenMan
Technologies,
Inc. as a
defendant along with our subsidiaries. We believe that GreenMan
Technologies,
Inc. has valid defenses to these claims, as well as against any
similar or
related claims that may be made against us in the future, and we
intend to
defend against any such claims vigorously. In addition to the
foregoing, we
are subject to routine claims from time to time in the ordinary
course of our
business. We do not believe that the resolution of any of the
claims that
are currently known to us will have a material adverse effect on
our
company or on
our financial statements.
8. Stockholders'
Equity
Common Stock
Transactions
On
April 12, 2006, our Chief Executive Officer purchased 500,000 shares
of
our
unregistered common stock (see Note 7) and on July 31, 2006 our
Chief
Financial
Officer purchased 50,000 unregistered shares of common stock.
During
the quarter ended June 30, 2006, a director agreed to convert
$90,000
principal and $1,676 interest due him under certain unsecured
promissory
notes payable
into 315,330 shares of our unregistered common stock. (see Note
5). On August
24, 2006, a director agreed to convert $200,000 of principal and
$76,445 of
accrued interest due him under an unsecured promissory note into
953,259
unregistered shares of common stock. (see Note 5)
During
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, several directors and
officers
agreed to accept 231,695 shares of unregistered common stock (valued
at
$82,046) in
lieu of cash for certain director's fees and expenses due the
individuals.
In addition, we issued 133,330 shares of unregistered stock (valued
at $30,000) to
a third party for consulting services rendered during fiscal
2006.
On
October 19, 2006, we issued 13,636 shares of our unregistered
common
stock valued
at $4,500 (at a price of $.33 which was the closing price of our
stock on the
date of issuance) to a third party for financial consulting
services
rendered during fiscal 2006. During the quarter ended March 31, 2007
we
issued an
additional 28,897 shares of our unregistered common stock valued at
$10,500 (at
prices ranging from $.34 to $.40 which represented the closing
price
of our stock
on the date of each issuance) to same
43
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Notes
To Consolidated Financial Statements
8. Stockholders'
Equity - (Continued)
third party
for consulting services rendered during fiscal 2006 and 2007. In
April 2007, we
executed a one year financial consulting agreement with this
third party.
In exchange for services to be provided, we agreed to (1) issue
25,000 shares
of unregistered common stock (valued at $8,250); (2) issue
warrants to
purchase 75,000 shares of common stock (valued at $7,500)
exercisable
for a three year period at prices ranging from $0.33 to $0.75 per
share.
In
conjunction with the relocation of corporate headquarters from
Massachusetts
to Minnesota we terminated our lease for our former headquarters
effective
November 1, 2006. In return for the termination, we gave our
landlord
$50,000 and
issued 65,000 shares of our unregistered common stock valued at
$32,500 at a
price of $.50 which was the closing price of our stock on the date
of issuance.
We were allowed to remain in the existing space through December
31, 2006. (See
Note 7).
During
the period of June through August 2007, Laurus acquired 1,154,098
shares of our
common stock upon the partial exercise of its warrant on a
cashless
basis.
During
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, several directors agreed
to accept
64,559 shares of unregistered common stock valued at $22,500 (all
shares were
issued at a price equal to the closing price of our common stock on
date of
issuance) in lieu of cash for certain director's fees and expenses
due
the
directors.
1993 Stock
Option Plan
The
1993 Stock Option Plan was established to provide stock options to
our
employees,
officers, directors and consultants. On March 29, 2001, our
stockholders
approved an increase to the number of shares authorized under the
Plan to
3,000,000. This plan expired in June 2004.
Stock
options and activity under the Plan is summarized as follows:
Year
Ended Year
Ended
September
30,
2007 September
30, 2006
------------------------- ------------------------
Weighted Weighted
Average Average
Exercise Exercise
Shares Price Shares Price
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Outstanding at
beginning of
period 1,032,356 $ .82 1,660,356 $ .85
Granted -- -- -- --
Forfeited or
expired (10,000) .71 (628,000) .94
Exercised -- -- -- --
---------- ----------
Outstanding at
end of
period 1,022,356 .82 1,032,356 .82
========== ==========
Exercisable at
end of
period 1,022,356 .82 1,022,356 .81
========== ==========
Reserved for
future grants at end of
period -- --
========== ==========
Aggregate
intrinsic value of
exercisable
options $ 100
==========
Weighted
average fair value of options
granted
during the
period $ -- $ --
Information
pertaining to options outstanding under the plan at September 30,
2007 is as
follows:
Options
Outstanding Options
Exercisable
------------------------------------- -----------------------
Weighted
Average Weighted Weighted
Remaining Average Average
Exercise Number Contractual Exercise Number Exercise
Prices Outstanding Life Price Exercisable Price
------ ----------- ----------- -------- ----------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ .38
-
..53 496,462 2.9 $ .49 496,462 $ .49
$ .84
-
1.09 477,894 0.5 1.06 477,894 1.06
$ 1.35 -
$1.80 48,000 3.8 1.80 48,000 1.80
--------- ---------
1,022,356 1.9 $ .82 1,022,356 $ .81
=========
=========
44
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Notes
To Consolidated Financial Statements
8. Stockholders'
Equity - (Continued)
2005 Stock
Option Plans
On
March 18, 2005, our Board of Directors adopted the 2005 Stock
Option
Plan (the
"2005 Plan"), which was subsequently approved by our stockholders
on
June 16, 2005.
The options granted under the 2005 Stock Option Plan may be
either options
intended to qualify as "incentive stock options" under Section
422 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; or non-qualified stock
options.
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, 929,000 qualified
options in
aggregate were granted with 792,000 options having an exercise
price
of $.28 per
share and 137,000 having an exercise price of $.36 per share. All
options vest
annually at 20% per year over a five year period from date of grant
and have a ten
year term. During fiscal 2007, 800,000 qualified options in
aggregate were
granted at exercise prices ranging from $.35 to $.55 per share.
All options
have a ten year term with 775,000 vesting equally over a five year
term from date
of grant and 25,000 vesting immediately upon grant.
Year
Ended Year
Ended
September
30,
2007 September
30, 2006
------------------------- ------------------------
Weighted Weighted
Average Average
Exercise Exercise
Shares Price Shares Price
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding at
beginning of
period 929,000 $ .29 -- $ --
Granted 800,000 .38 929,000 .29
Forfeited or
expired (67,000) .28 -- --
Exercised -- -- -- --
---------- ----------
Outstanding at
end of
period 1,662,000 .34 929,000 .29
========== ==========
Exercisable at
end of
period 197,400 .30 -- --
========== ==========
Reserved for
future
grants 338,000 1,071,000
========== ==========
Aggregate
intrinsic value of
exercisable
options $ 17,522
==========
Weighted
average fair value of options
granted
during the
period $ .27 $ .12
Information
pertaining to options outstanding under the plan at September 30,
2007 is as
follows:
Options
Outstanding Options
Exercisable
------------------------------------- -----------------------
Weighted
Average Weighted Weighted
Remaining Average Average
Exercise Number Contractual Exercise Number Exercise
Prices Outstanding Life Price Exercisable Price
------ ----------- ----------- -------- ----------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ .28 -
..55 1,662,000 9.0 $
..34 197,400 $
..30
The following
table summarizes activity related to non-vested options:
Year
Ended
September
30, 2007
-------------------------
Weighted
Average
Grant
Date
Shares Fair
Value
---------- ----------
Nonvested at
beginning of
period 929,000 $ .22
Granted 800,000 .27
Forfeited (67,000) .22
Vested (197,400) .23
----------
Nonvested at
end of
period 1,464,600 .25
==========
Non-Employee
Director Stock Option Plan
Under
the terms of our 1996 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan on a
non-employee
director's initial election to the Board of Directors, they are
automatically
granted an option to purchase 2,000 shares of our common stock.
Each person
who was a member of the Board of Directors on January 24, 1996, and
was not an
officer or employee, was automatically granted an option to
purchase
2,000 shares
of our common stock. In addition, after an individual's initial
election to
the Board of Directors, any director who is not an officer or
employee and
who continues to serve as a director will automatically be granted,
on the date of
the annual meeting of stockholders, an option to purchase an
additional
2,000 shares of our common stock. The exercise price per share of
options
granted under the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan is 100% of
the
fair-market
value of our common stock on the business day immediately prior to
the date of
the grant and is immediately exercisable for a period of ten years
from the date
of the grant.
45
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Notes
To Consolidated Financial Statements
8. Stockholders'
Equity - (Continued)
As
of September 30, 2007, options to purchase 38,000 shares of our
common
stock have
been granted of which 28,000 are outstanding and exercisable at
prices ranging
from $0.38 to $1.95. During fiscal 2006, the Compensation
Committee
agreed to discontinue future option grants pursuant to the
Non-Employee
Director Stock Option Plan. At September 30, 2007, options
outstanding
had a weighted average exercise price of $1.10 per share and a
weighted
average contractual life of 5.5 years.
Other Stock
Options and Warrants
On
June 30, 2006, we issued Laurus a warrant to purchase up to an
aggregate of
3,586,429 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to
$0.01 per
share. This option, valued at $1,116,927, is immediately
exercisable,
has a term of
ten years, allows for cashless exercise at the option of Laurus,
and does not
contain any "put" provisions.
In
April 2007, we executed a one year investor relations consulting
agreement with
this third party. In exchange for services to be provided, we
agreed to (1)
pay $6,500 per month and (2) issue warrants to purchase 150,000
shares of
common stock (valued at $28,500) which vest equally over a twenty
four
month period
from date of agreement and are exercisable for a three year period
at from $0.40
per share.
Information
pertaining to all other options and warrants granted and
outstanding is
as follows:
Year
Ended Year
Ended
September
30, 2007 September
30, 2006
------------------------- ------------------------
Weighted Weighted
Average Average
Exercise Exercise
Shares Price Shares Price
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding at
beginning of
period 8,953,603 $ .44 7,015,574 $ .98
Granted 225,000 .44 3,586,429 .01
Forfeited or
expired (827,106) 1.92 (1,648,400) 1.80
Exercised (1,188,095) .01 -- --
----------- -----------
Outstanding at
end of
period 7,163,402 .44 8,953,603 .44
===========
===========
Exercisable at
end of
period 7,032,152 .44 8,948,603 .44
===========
===========
Aggregate
intrinsic value of
exercisable
options and warrants $ 1,829,744
===========
Weighted
average fair value of
options
granted during the
period $ .44 $ .31
Options
Outstanding Options
Exercisable
------------------------------------- -----------------------
Weighted
Average Weighted Weighted
Remaining Average Average
Exercise Number Contractual Exercise Number Exercise
Prices Outstanding Life Price Exercisable Price
------ ----------- ----------- -------- ----------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ .01
-
1.09 6,868,402 6.4 $
..27 6,737,152 $
..27
$ 1.50 -
4.50 295,000 2.9 1.93 295,000 1.93
--------- ---------
7,163,402 6.3 $
..34 7,032,152 $
..34
=========
=========
Common Stock
Reserved
We
have reserved common stock at September 30, 2007 as follows:
Stock
option plans
................................. 2,684,356
Other
stock options
................................ 955,500
Other
warrants
..................................... 6,235,902
---------
9,875,758
=========
9. Employee
Benefit Plan
Effective
August 1999, we implemented a Section 401(k) plan for all
eligible
employees. Employees are permitted to make elective deferrals of up
to
15% of
employee compensation and employee contributions to the 401(k) plan
are
fully vested
at all times. We may make discretionary contributions to the 401(k)
plan which
become vested over a period of five years. There were no corporate
contributions
to the 401(k) plan during the years ended September 30, 2007 and
2006,
respectively.
46
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Notes
To Consolidated Financial Statements
10. Segment
Information
We
operate in one business segment, the collecting, processing and
marketing of
scrap tires to be used as feedstock for tire derived fuel, civil
engineering
projects and/or for further processing into crumb rubber.
11. Major
Customers
During
the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, no one customer
accounted for
more than 10% of our consolidated net sales.
12. Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
At
September 30, 2007 and 2006, our financial instruments consist of
accounts
receivable, accounts payable and notes payable to banks and others.
These
instruments approximate their fair values as these instruments are
either
due currently
or were negotiated currently and bear interest at market rates.
13. Income
Taxes
The
provision for income taxes was comprised of the following amounts
for
the years
ended:
September
30, September 30,
2007 2006
------------- -------------
Current:
Federal
................................... $ 22,691 $ --
State
..................................... 93,108 65,337
------------- -------------
115,799 65,337
------------- -------------
Deferred
federal and state taxes
.......... -- --
------------- -------------
Total
provision for income taxes
.......... $ 115,799 $ 65,337
=============
=============
The
current state taxes result from income in states where we have no
net
operating loss
carry forwards. The provision for deferred income taxes reflect
the impact of
"temporary differences" between amounts of assets and liabilities
recorded for
financial reporting purposes and the amounts recorded for income
tax reporting
purposes.
The
difference between the statutory federal income tax rate of 34% and
the effective
rate is primarily due to net operating losses incurred by us and
the provision
of a valuation reserve against the related deferred tax assets.
The
following differences give rise to deferred income taxes:
September
30, September 30,
2007 2006
------------- -------------
Net operating
loss carry forwards
............. $ 12,367,000 $ 12,961,000
Differences in
fixed asset bases
.............. (529,000) (503,000)
Capital loss
carryover
........................ 1,287,000 1,287,000
Other, net
.................................... 801,000 543,000
------------- -------------
13,926,000 14,288,000
Valuation
reserve
............................. (13,926,000) (14,288,000)
------------- -------------
Net deferred
tax asset
........................ $ -- $ --
=============
=============
The
change in the valuation reserve is as follows:
Year
Ended Year Ended
September
30, September 30,
2007 2006
------------- -------------
Balance at
beginning of period
.................. $ 14,288,000 $ 13,653,000
Decrease
(increase) due to rate differentials
and
current period operating results
......... 362,000 (635,000)
------------- -------------
Balance at end
of period
........................ $ 13,926,000 $ 14,288,000
=============
=============
As
of September 30, 2007, we had net operating loss carry forwards of
approximately
$36 million including a net operating loss of $33 million and a $3
million
capital loss carryforward. The Federal and state net operating loss
carry forwards
expire in varying amounts beginning in 2013 and 2007,
respectively.
In addition, we have Federal tax credit carry forwards of
approximately
$17,000 available to reduce future tax liabilities. The Federal
tax credit
carry forwards expire beginning in 2013. Use of net operating loss
and tax credit
carry forwards maybe subject to annual limitations based on
ownership
changes in our common stock as defined by the Internal Revenue
Code.
47
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Notes
To Consolidated Financial Statements
14. Subsequent
Events
On
October 1, 2007 we acquired Welch Products, Inc., a company
headquartered
in Carlisle, Iowa, which specializes in design, product
development,
and manufacturing of environmentally responsible products using
recycled
materials, primarily recycled rubber. Welch's patented products and
processes
include playground safety tiles, roadside anti-vegetation products,
construction
molds and highway guard-rail rubber spacer blocks. Through its
recent
acquisition of Playtribe, Inc., Welch also provides innovative
playground
design,
equipment and installation. Welch Products had been one of our
crumb
rubber
customers for the past several years. The transaction was structured as
a
share exchange
in which 100 percent of Welch Products' common stock was
exchanged for
8 million shares of our common stock, valued at $2,800,000.
The
unaudited revenues of Welch Products for the twelve months ended
September 30,
2007 was approximately $1.8 million and they had a net loss of
approximately
$646,000.
The
preliminary allocation of the purchase price is subject to change
based on
finalization of the fair values of the tangible and intangible
assets
acquired and
liabilities assumed. The estimated preliminary purchase price of
$2,875,000
including approximately $75,000 of transaction costs has been
calculated
based on the value of the 8 million shares issued in this
transaction
on the date of
issuance.
Preliminary
information related to assets and liabilities acquired
are
as follows:
Total tangible
assets
acquired $2,361,000
Identifiable
intangible assets
acquired 207,000
Total
liabilities
acquired 2,767,000
Estimated
excess purchase price over the fair value of net
assets
acquired 3,075,000
We anticipate
that a majority of the excess purchase price over the fair value
of net assets
acquired will be allocated to contract rights, patents and
goodwill.
48
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the
Registrant
caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
/s/
Lyle Jensen
---------------
Lyle
Jensen
Chief
Executive Officer
In accordance
with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the
following
persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the
dates
indicated.
Signature Title(s) Date
--------- -------- ----
/s/
Maurice E. Needham Chairman
of the Board December
31, 2007
-------------------------
Maurice
E. Needham
/s/
Lyle
Jensen Chief
Executive Officer, December 31,
2007
------------------------- President
and Director
Lyle
Jensen
/s/
Charles E. Coppa Chief
Financial Officer, December 31,
2007
------------------------- Treasurer
and Secretary
Charles
E. Coppa (Principal Financial Officer
and
Principal
Accounting Officer)
/s/
Lew F.
Boyd Director December
31, 2007
-------------------------
Lew
F. Boyd
/s/
Dr. Allen
Kahn Director December
31, 2007
-------------------------
Dr.
Allen Kahn
/s/ Nicholas
DeBenedictis Director December
31, 2007
-------------------------
Nicholas
DeBenedictis
49
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2008
GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Form
10-QSB
Quarterly
Report
June
30, 2008
Table
of Contents
|
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
Page
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements (*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2008 and September
30, 2007
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit for the nine
months ended June 30, 2008
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
to Interim Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
7-14
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
|
15-23
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
23
|
|
|
|
Item
4
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
24
|
|
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
and Reports on Form 8-K
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
25
|
*
|
The
financial information at September 30, 2007 has been taken from audited
financial statements at that date and should be read in conjunction
therewith. All other financial statements are
unaudited.
|
GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
June
30,
2008
|
|
|
September
30,
2007
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
543,057 |
|
|
$ |
376,764 |
|
Accounts
receivable, trade, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $325,310
and $268,867 as of June 30, 2008 and September 30,
2007
|
|
|
3,658,640 |
|
|
|
2,462,358 |
|
Product
inventory
|
|
|
1,992,927 |
|
|
|
157,094 |
|
Other
current assets
|
|
|
1,305,754 |
|
|
|
764,046 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
7,500,378 |
|
|
|
3,760,262 |
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
6,623,658 |
|
|
|
5,218,706 |
|
Other
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer
relationship intangibles, net
|
|
|
67,272 |
|
|
|
72,485 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,289,939 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Long
term contracts, net
|
|
|
599,063 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Patents,
net
|
|
|
113,750 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Other
|
|
|
729,814 |
|
|
|
239,750 |
|
Total
other assets
|
|
|
3,799,838 |
|
|
|
312,235 |
|
|
|
$ |
17,923,874 |
|
|
$ |
9,291,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
payable, current
|
|
$ |
10,275,467 |
|
|
$ |
1,072,117 |
|
Notes
payable, line of credit
|
|
|
2,999,662 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
2,612,077 |
|
|
|
1,320,320 |
|
Accrued
expenses, other
|
|
|
2,095,316 |
|
|
|
1,579,725 |
|
Obligations
under capital leases, current
|
|
|
337,555 |
|
|
|
185,127 |
|
Obligations
due under lease settlement, current
|
|
|
68,518 |
|
|
|
68,518 |
|
Deferred
gain on sale leaseback transaction, current
|
|
|
36,445 |
|
|
|
36,445 |
|
Liabilities
related to discontinued operations
|
|
|
397,903 |
|
|
|
3,018,503 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
18,822,943 |
|
|
|
7,280,755 |
|
Notes
payable, non-current
|
|
|
2,088,087 |
|
|
|
10,272,574 |
|
Notes
payable, related parties, non-current
|
|
|
534,320 |
|
|
|
534,320 |
|
Obligations
under capital leases, non-current
|
|
|
1,529,791 |
|
|
|
1,272,527 |
|
Deferred
gain on sale leaseback transaction, non-current
|
|
|
242,894 |
|
|
|
270,298 |
|
Obligations
due under lease settlement, non-current
|
|
|
580,540 |
|
|
|
580,540 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
23,798,575 |
|
|
|
20,211,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
deficit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $1.00 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none
outstanding
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Common
stock, $.01 par value, 60,000,000 shares authorized, 30,880,435 shares and
22,880,435 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2008 and September
30, 2007
|
|
|
308,804 |
|
|
|
228,804 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
38,829,920 |
|
|
|
35,995,473 |
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(45,013,425 |
) |
|
|
(47,144,088 |
) |
Total
stockholders’ deficit
|
|
|
(5,874,701 |
) |
|
|
(10,919,811 |
) |
|
|
$ |
17,923,874 |
|
|
$ |
9,291,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June
30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
7,557,561 |
|
|
$ |
5,320,269 |
|
|
$ |
17,710,424 |
|
|
$ |
13,671,561 |
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
5,043,001 |
|
|
|
3,577,713 |
|
|
|
12,410,169 |
|
|
|
9,670,433 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
2,514,560 |
|
|
|
1,742,556 |
|
|
|
5,300,255 |
|
|
|
4,001,128 |
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
1,377,737 |
|
|
|
944,541 |
|
|
|
3,996,505 |
|
|
|
2,813,558 |
|
Operating
income from continuing operations
|
|
|
1,136,823 |
|
|
|
798,015 |
|
|
|
1,303,750 |
|
|
|
1,187,570 |
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
and financing costs
|
|
|
(497,293 |
) |
|
|
(559,702 |
) |
|
|
(1,489,457 |
) |
|
|
(1,605,529 |
) |
Other,
net
|
|
|
(8,010 |
) |
|
|
5,804 |
|
|
|
7,878 |
|
|
|
(5,249 |
) |
Other
expense, net
|
|
|
(505,303 |
) |
|
|
(553,898 |
) |
|
|
(1,481,579 |
) |
|
|
(1,610,778 |
) |
Income
(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
631,520 |
|
|
|
244,117 |
|
|
|
(177,829 |
) |
|
|
(423,208 |
) |
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
32,365 |
|
|
|
52,438 |
|
|
|
32,365 |
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
631,520 |
|
|
|
211,752 |
|
|
|
(230,267 |
) |
|
|
(455,573 |
) |
Discontinued
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from discontinued operations
|
|
|
2,360,930 |
|
|
|
101,683 |
|
|
|
2,360,930 |
|
|
|
111,510 |
|
|
|
|
2,360,930 |
|
|
|
101,683 |
|
|
|
2,360,930 |
|
|
|
111,510 |
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
2,992,450 |
|
|
$ |
313,435 |
|
|
$ |
2,130,663 |
|
|
$ |
(344,063 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations per share –basic
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
Income
from discontinued operations per share –basic
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Net
Income (loss) per share –basic
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
Net
Income (loss) per share –diluted
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding -basic
|
|
|
30,880,435 |
|
|
|
21,588,422 |
|
|
|
30,880,435 |
|
|
|
21,526,772 |
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding -diluted
|
|
|
35,497,427 |
|
|
|
27,339,591 |
|
|
|
35,558,341 |
|
|
|
21,526,772 |
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Consolidated
Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit
Nine
Months Ended June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance,
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
22,880,435 |
|
|
$ |
228,804 |
|
|
$ |
35,995,473 |
|
|
$ |
(47,144,088 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,919,811 |
) |
Common
stock issued for acquisition
|
|
|
8,000,000 |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
2,720,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,800,000 |
|
Compensation
expense associated with stock options
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
103,746 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
103,746 |
|
Value
of warrants issued for services rendered
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,701 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,701 |
|
Net
income for the nine months ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,130,663 |
|
|
|
2,130,663 |
|
Balance,
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
30,880,435 |
|
|
$ |
308,804 |
|
|
$ |
38,829,920 |
|
|
$ |
(45,013,425 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,874,701 |
) |
See
accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Unaudited
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow
(Unaudited)
|
Nine
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
$ |
2,130,663 |
|
|
$ |
(344,063 |
) |
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash (used) in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain
associated with de-consolidation of Georgia subsidiary
|
|
(2,360,930 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Gain
on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
|
(26,311 |
) |
|
|
(25,916 |
) |
Depreciation
|
|
1,062,415 |
|
|
|
1,077,221 |
|
Amortization
of deferred interest expense
|
|
389,076 |
|
|
|
383,626 |
|
Amortization
of customer relationships
|
|
5,213 |
|
|
|
11,212 |
|
Amortization
of stock option compensation expense
|
|
103,746 |
|
|
|
39,300 |
|
Amortization
of patents
|
|
16,250 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Amortization
of long term contracts
|
|
134,437 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Deferred
gain on sale leaseback transaction
|
|
(27,404 |
) |
|
|
(27,330 |
) |
Warrants
issued
|
|
12,576 |
|
|
|
— |
|
(Increase)
decrease in assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
(659,386 |
) |
|
|
(531,706 |
) |
Product
inventory
|
|
(1,338,177 |
) |
|
|
(744,668 |
) |
Other
current assets
|
|
(181,283 |
) |
|
|
(10,660 |
) |
Other
assets
|
|
(17,185 |
) |
|
|
1,439 |
|
Increase
(decrease) in liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
206,563 |
|
|
|
(516,396 |
) |
Accrued
expenses and other
|
|
190,432 |
|
|
|
203,906 |
|
Net
cash (used) in operating activities
|
|
(359,305 |
) |
|
|
(484,035 |
) |
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
|
(1,312,010 |
) |
|
|
(769,445 |
) |
Cash
acquired upon purchase of business, net of transaction
costs
|
|
68,571 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds
from the sale of property and equipment
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
50,039 |
|
Net
cash (used) in investing activities
|
|
(1,241,439 |
) |
|
|
(719,406 |
) |
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
activity under line of credit
|
|
2,999,662 |
|
|
|
877,542 |
|
Proceeds
from notes payable
|
|
815,889 |
|
|
|
491,418 |
|
Repayment
of notes payable
|
|
(1,854,450 |
) |
|
|
(361,781 |
) |
Repayment
of notes payable, related party
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
Principal
payments on obligations under capital leases
|
|
(194,064 |
) |
|
|
(213,040 |
) |
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
1,767,037 |
|
|
|
764,139 |
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
166,293 |
|
|
|
(439,302 |
) |
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
376,764 |
|
|
|
639,014 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ |
543,057 |
|
|
$ |
199,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery
and equipment acquired under capital leases
|
$ |
603,756 |
|
|
$ |
164,699 |
|
Shares
issued in acquisition
|
|
2,800,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Shares
issued in lieu of cash for fees, expenses and service
rendered
|
|
— |
|
|
|
44,046 |
|
Shares
issued for lease settlement
|
|
— |
|
|
|
32,500 |
|
Interest
paid
|
|
1,031,656 |
|
|
|
1,115,745 |
|
Income
taxes paid
|
|
82,323 |
|
|
|
35,300 |
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes
to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Quarter
Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
(Unaudited)
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries “we”, “us” or “our”) was
originally founded in 1992 and has operated as a Delaware corporation since
1995. Today, GreenMan is comprised of two business segments, the tire recycling
operations and the molded recycled rubber products operations.
The
tire recycling operations located in Savage, Minnesota and Des Moines, Iowa
collect, process and market scrap tires in whole, shredded or granular form. We
are paid a fee to collect, transport and process scrap tires (i.e., collection/processing
revenue) in whole or into two inch or smaller rubber chips which are then sold
(i.e., product
revenue).
On
October 1, 2007, we acquired Welch Products, Inc. (“Welch”), a company
headquartered in Carlisle, Iowa, which specializes in designing, developing, and
manufacturing of environmentally responsible products using recycled materials,
primarily recycled rubber. Welch’s patented products and processes include
playground safety tiles, roadside anti-vegetation products, construction molds
and highway guard-rail rubber spacer blocks. Through its prior acquisition of
Playtribe, Inc., Welch also provides innovative playground design, equipment and
installation. (See Note 4).
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of GreenMan Technologies,
Inc. and our wholly-owned subsidiaries with the exception of Welch, which is
included since October 1, 2007. All significant intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
In
September 2005, due to the magnitude of continued operating losses, our Board of
Directors approved plans to divest the operations of our GreenMan Technologies
of Georgia, Inc. subsidiary and dispose of its assets. Accordingly, we
classified all remaining liabilities associated with our Georgia entity and its
results of operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented in
the accompanying consolidated financial statements. In June 2008, GreenMan
Technologies of Georgia, Inc. filed for liquidation under Chapter 7 of the
federal bankruptcy laws in the Bankruptcy Court of the Middle District of
Georgia and a trustee was appointed (See Note 5.) As a result of the bankruptcy
proceedings we have relinquished control of our Georgia subsidiary to the
Bankruptcy Court and therefore have de-consolidated substantially all remaining
obligations from our financial statements as of June 30, 2008.
The
accompanying interim financial statements are unaudited and should be read in
conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended
September 30, 2007 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, as amended.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the
Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations, although we believe
the disclosures which have been made herein are adequate to ensure that the
information presented is not misleading. The results of operations
for the interim periods reported are not necessarily indicative of those that
may be reported for a full year. In our opinion, all adjustments
which are necessary for a fair statement of operating results for the interim
periods presented have been made.
Nature
of Operations, Risks, and Uncertainties
As of
June 30, 2008, we had $543,057 in cash and cash equivalents and a working
capital deficiency of $11,322,565 of which reflects the inclusion of $9.8
million of term debt due our primary lender, Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., under the
terms of our credit facility which matures June 30, 2009. Commencing October 1,
2008, our principal payments due to Laurus under this term debt are scheduled to
increase substantially. We are currently in discussions with Laurus regarding an
initial 12 month extension in the term of the credit facility as well as
maintaining our current level of monthly principal payments through the
remainder of the existing term and the potential extension term. If
we are unable to restructure our remaining principal payments with Laurus or
obtain additional financing, our ability to maintain our current level of
operations could be materially and adversely affected and we may be required to
adjust our operating plans accordingly.
We
understand our continued existence is dependent on our ability to generate
positive operating cash flow and achieve profitable status on a sustained basis
for all operations. We believe our efforts to achieve these goals, have been
positively impacted by our divestiture of historically unprofitable operations
during fiscal 2006 and 2005 as evidenced by the fact we have been profitable in
four of our last five consecutive quarters. In addition, during the nine months
ended June 30, 2008, we have made a significant investment in sales and
marketing efforts to promote Welch’s patented products and establish market
presence.
GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes
to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Quarter
Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
(Unaudited)
3.
|
Net
Income (Loss) Per Share
|
Basic
earnings per share represents income available to common stockholders divided by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
period. Diluted earnings per share reflects additional common shares
that would have been outstanding if potentially dilutive common shares had been
issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed
conversion. Potential common shares that may be issued by us relate
to outstanding stock options and warrants (determined using the treasury stock
method). Diluted net income per share for the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
June 30, 2008
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
|
|
30,880,435 |
|
|
|
30,880,435 |
|
Exercisable
options and warrants
|
|
|
4,616,992 |
|
|
|
4,677,906 |
|
Weighted
average shares, fully diluted
|
|
|
35,497,427 |
|
|
|
35,558,341 |
|
Net
income per share – fully diluted from continuing
operations
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Net
income per share – fully diluted from discontinued
operations
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
Net
income per share – fully diluted
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
4.
|
Acquisition
of Subsidiary
|
On
October 1, 2007, we acquired Welch Products, Inc., a company headquartered in
Carlisle, Iowa, which specializes in designing, developing and manufacturing of
environmentally responsible products using recycled materials, primarily
recycled rubber. Welch’s patented products and processes include playground
safety tiles, roadside anti-vegetation products, construction molds and highway
guard-rail rubber spacer blocks. Through its prior acquisition of Playtribe,
Inc., Welch also provides innovative playground design, equipment and
installation. Welch had been one of our crumb rubber customers for
the past several years. The transaction was structured as a share exchange in
which 100 percent of Welch’s common stock was exchanged for 8 million shares of
our common stock, valued at $2,800,000 based on the value of the 8 million
shares issued in this transaction on the date of issuance. Welch’s unaudited
revenues for the twelve months ended September 30, 2007 were approximately $1.8
million and Welch recorded a net loss of approximately $646,000 for that
period.
The
acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase in accordance with SFAS No.
141, “Business Combinations”, and accordingly the results of Welch’s operations
since the date of acquisition are included in our consolidated financial
statements. The total purchase price of $2,890,000 including
approximately $90,000 of transaction costs has been allocated as
follows:
Total
identifiable assets acquired
|
$
2,571,000
|
Total
identifiable liabilities acquired
|
$
2,821,000
|
The
total consideration paid exceeded the fair value of the net assets acquired by
$3,140,000 resulting in the recognition of $2,289,000 of goodwill and $645,000
assigned to long term contracts (in addition to $90,000 assigned to an existing
contract and being amortized over a 5-year term) based on an analysis of the
discounted future net cash flows of the contracts. In addition, we
increased the value of land and buildings by $195,000 based on a recent
appraisal and increased the value assigned to patents by $11,000 based on an
analysis of discounted future cash flows associated with the
patents. The value assigned to the long term contracts is being
amortized on a straight line basis over an estimated useful life ranging from 48
to 60 months and the value assigned to patents is being amortized on a straight
line basis over an estimated useful life of 60 months. Goodwill will be
evaluated annually.
The
net value of Welch intangibles other than goodwill is as follows as of June 30,
2008:
|
|
Long
Term Contracts |
|
|
Patents
|
|
Original
value
|
|
$ |
735,000 |
|
|
$ |
130,000 |
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
|
|
(135,938 |
) |
|
|
(16,250 |
) |
Balance
at June 30, 2008
|
|
$ |
599,062 |
|
|
$ |
113,750 |
|
Amortization
expense for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 associated with Welch
intangibles was $50,229 and $150,688, respectively.
GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes
to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Quarter
Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
(Unaudited)
4.
|
Acquisition
of Subsidiary – (Continued)
|
Amortization expense during the next
five years is anticipated to be:
Twelve months ending June
30:
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Patents
|
|
|
Total
|
|
2009
|
|
$ |
179,250 |
|
|
$ |
21,667 |
|
|
$ |
200,917 |
|
2010
|
|
|
179,250 |
|
|
|
21,667 |
|
|
|
200,917 |
|
2011
|
|
|
179,250 |
|
|
|
21,667 |
|
|
|
200,917 |
|
2012
|
|
|
58,310 |
|
|
|
21,666 |
|
|
|
79,976 |
|
2013
and thereafter
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
27,083 |
|
|
|
30,083 |
|
|
|
$ |
599,060 |
|
|
$ |
113,750 |
|
|
$ |
712,810 |
|
Management
continually reviews long-lived assets, goodwill and certain identifiable
intangibles to evaluate whether events or changes in circumstances indicate an
impairment of carrying value. Such reviews include an analysis of
current results and take into consideration the discounted value of projected
operating cash flows (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization). An impairment charge would be recognized when expected
future operating cash flows are lower than the carrying value of the
assets.
5.
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
Due to
the magnitude of the continuing operating losses incurred by our GreenMan
Technologies of Georgia, Inc. subsidiary ($3.4 million) during fiscal 2005, our
Board of Directors determined it to be in the best interest of our company to
discontinue all Georgia operations and completed the divestiture of its
operating assets during fiscal 2006. Accordingly, we have classified
all remaining liabilities associated with our Georgia entity and its results of
operations as discontinued operations.
On June
27, 2008, GreenMan Technologies of Georgia, Inc. filed for liquidation under
Chapter 7 of the federal bankruptcy laws in the Bankruptcy Court of the Middle
District of Georgia and a trustee was appointed. In July 2008 a
Meeting of Creditors was held and we are awaiting the trustee’s final
report. As a result of the bankruptcy proceedings we have
relinquished control of our Georgia subsidiary to the Bankruptcy Court and
therefore have de-consolidated substantially all remaining obligations from our
financial statements as of June 30, 2008 resulting in a one-time, pre-tax
non-cash gain of $2,360,930 which is reflected as income from discontinued
operations in the attached Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three
and nine months ended June 30, 2008.
During
the nine months ended June 30, 2007, we received credits from vendors, we
recovered certain bad debts and we reduced certain accrued expenses. This offset
a $19,058 increase in our lease settlement reserve (see the discussion of our
Georgia lease below) resulting in approximately $112,000 of income from
discontinued Georgia operations.
In February 2006, we amended our Georgia
lease agreement to obtain the right to terminate the original lease which had a
remaining term of approximately 15 years, by providing the landlord with six
months notice. In the event of termination, we will be obligated to continue to
pay rent until the earlier to occur of (1) the sale by the landlord of the
premises; (2) the date on which a new tenant takes over; or (3) three years from
the date on which we vacate the property.
In August
2006, we received notice from the Georgia landlord indicating that the Georgia
subsidiary was in default under the lease due to its insolvent financial
condition. The landlord agreed to waive the default in return for a $75,000 fee
to be paid upon termination of the lease and required that all current and
future rights and obligations under the lease be assigned to GreenMan
Technologies, Inc. pursuant to a March 29, 2001 guaranty agreement. The net
present value of the lease settlement obligation increased by $19,058 during the
nine months ended June 30, 2007, and is included in discontinued
operations. The $75,000 is included in obligations due under lease
settlement at June 30, 2008.
The major
classes of liabilities associated with discontinued operations
were:
|
|
June
30,
2008
|
|
|
September
30,
2007
|
|
Liabilities
related to discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$ |
233,334 |
|
|
$ |
2,502,779 |
|
Notes
payable, current
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
357,340 |
|
Accrued expenses, other
|
|
|
164,569 |
|
|
|
107,115 |
|
Capital
leases, current
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
51,269 |
|
Total liabilities related to discontinued
operations
|
|
$ |
397,903 |
|
|
$ |
3,018,503 |
|
GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes
to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Quarter
Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
(Unaudited)
5.
|
Discontinued
Operations – (Continued)
|
Net
income and (loss) from discontinued operations for the three and nine months
ended were as follows:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Income
from discontinued operations
|
|
$ |
2,360,930 |
|
|
$ |
101,683 |
|
|
$ |
2,360,930 |
|
|
$ |
111,510 |
|
6.
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
Property,
plant and equipment consists of the following:
|
|
June
30,
2008
|
|
|
September 30,
2007
|
|
|
Estimated
Useful
Lives
|
|
Land
|
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
—
|
|
Buildings
and improvements
|
|
|
1,995,073 |
|
|
|
1,384,028 |
|
|
10
- 20 years
|
|
Machinery
and equipment
|
|
|
9,147,987 |
|
|
|
7,379,405 |
|
|
5
- 10 years
|
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
|
|
81,635 |
|
|
|
15,147 |
|
|
3
- 5 years
|
|
Motor
vehicles
|
|
|
4,610,442 |
|
|
|
3,928,089 |
|
|
3
- 10 years
|
|
|
|
|
16,010,137 |
|
|
|
12,706,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(9,386,479 |
) |
|
|
(7,487,963 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
|
$ |
6,623,658 |
|
|
$ |
5,218,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Notes
Payable/Credit Facilities
|
June
2006 Laurus Credit Facility
On June
30, 2006, we entered into a $16 million amended and restated credit facility
with Laurus (the “Credit Facility”). The New Credit Facility consists of a $5
million non-convertible secured revolving note and an $11 million secured
non-convertible term note. The credit facility is secured by first priority security
interests in all of the assets of our company and all of the assets of our
GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota, Inc. and GreenMan Technologies of Iowa, Inc.
subsidiaries, as well as by pledges of the capital stock of those
subsidiaries. In January 2008, we granted Laurus additional security
interest in the assets of Welch Products and its subsidiaries, which increased
our borrowing base under the revolving note described above.
The
revolving note has a three-year term from the closing, bears interest on any
outstanding amounts at the prime rate plus 2% (7% at June 30, 2008), with a
minimum rate of 8%. Amounts advanced under the line are limited to
90% of eligible accounts receivable and 50% of finished goods inventory, up to a
maximum of $5 million, subject to certain limitations. As of June 30,
2008, the balance due under the revolving note was $2,999,662.
The term
loan has a maturity date of June 30, 2009 and bears interest at the prime rate
plus 2% (7% at June 30, 2008), with a minimum rate of 8%. Principal
is amortized over the term of the loan, commencing on July 2, 2007, with minimum
monthly payments of principal as follows: (i) for the period
commencing on July 2, 2007 through June 2008, minimum principal payments of
$150,000; (ii) for the period from July 2008 through June 2009, minimum
principal payments of $400,000; and (iii) the balance of the principal will be
payable on the maturity date. In May 2007, Laurus agreed to reduce the principal
payments required during the period of July 2007 to September 2008 to $100,000
per month and defer the difference of $1,500,000 to the June 2009 maturity date.
We are currently in discussions with Laurus regarding an initial 12 month
extension in the term of the credit facility as well as maintaining our current
level of monthly principal payments through the remainder of the existing term
and the potential extension term. If we are unable to restructure our
remaining principal payments with Laurus or obtain additional financing, our
ability to maintain our current level of operations could be materially and
adversely affected and we may be required to adjust our operating plans
accordingly.
In
addition, we have agreed to make an excess cash flow repayments beginning with
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 equal to 50% of (a) the aggregate net
operating cash flow generated for such fiscal year less (b) aggregate capital
expenditures made in such fiscal year (up to a maximum of 25% of the net
operating cash flow calculated in accordance with this clause). Laurus agreed to
waive this provision for the year ended September 30, 2007. The term loan may be
prepaid at any time without penalty.
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Notes
to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Quarter
Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
(Unaudited)
7.
|
Credit
Facility/Notes Payable –
(Continued)
|
In
connection with the New Credit Facility, we issued Laurus a warrant to purchase
up to 3,586,429 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to $0.01
per share. This warrant, valued at $1,116,927, is immediately exercisable, has a
term of ten years, allows for cashless exercise at the option of Laurus, and
does not contain any “put” provisions. Previously issued warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 1,380,000 shares of our common stock, which were issued in
connection with the original notes on June 30, 2004, were canceled as part of
this transaction. The amount of our common stock Laurus may hold at any given
time is limited to no more than 4.99% of our outstanding common stock. This
limitation may be waived by Laurus upon 61 days notice to us and does not apply
if an event of default occurs and is continuing under the New Credit Facility.
The fair value of these terminated warrants was determined to be $31,774 and
offset the value of the new warrant issued. In addition, the fair
value associated with the foregone convertibility feature of all previous
convertible amounts was determined to be $740,998 and also offset the value of
the new warrant issued. As a result of the foregoing, the net value assigned to
the new warrant of $344,155 was recorded as paid-in capital and recorded as a
reduction to the carrying value of the refinanced note as described
below.
Laurus
has agreed that it will not, on any trading day, be permitted to sell any common
stock acquired upon exercise of this warrant in excess of 10% of the aggregate
number of shares of the common stock traded on such trading day. On January 25,
2007, we filed a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933
relating to the 3,586,429 shares underlying the June 30, 2006 warrant as well as
553,997 shares issuable to another shareholder upon exercise of a warrant. The
registration statement was declared effective on February 6, 2007. During the
period of June through August 2007, Laurus acquired 1,154,098 shares of our
common stock upon the partial exercise of its warrants on a cashless
basis.
Subject
to applicable cure periods, amounts borrowed under the New Credit Facility are
subject to acceleration upon certain events of default, including: (i) any
failure to pay when due any amount we owe under the New Credit Facility; (ii)
any material breach by us of any other covenant made to Laurus; (iii) any
misrepresentation, in any material respect, made by us to Laurus in the
documents governing the New Credit Facility; (iv) the institution of certain
bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings by or against us; (v) the entry of certain
monetary judgments greater than $50,000 against us that are not paid or vacated
for a period of 30 business days; (vi) suspensions of trading of our common
stock; (vii) any failure to deliver shares of common stock upon exercise of the
warrant; (viii) certain defaults under agreements related to any of our other
indebtedness; and (ix) changes of control of our company. Substantial fees and
penalties are payable to Laurus in the event of a default.
Pursuant
to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 15, “Accounting by Debtors
and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructuring” (“SFAS 15”) the Credit Facility
has been accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring. It was determined that,
because the effective interest rate of the New Credit Facility was lower than
that of the previous credit facility therefore indicating a concession was
granted by Laurus, we are viewed as a passive beneficiary of the restructuring,
and no new transaction has occurred. Under SFAS 15, a modification of terms "is
neither an event that results in a new asset or liability for accounting
purposes nor an event that requires a new measurement of an existing asset or
liability." Thus, from a debtor's standpoint, SFAS 15 calls for a modification
of the terms of a loan to be accounted for prospectively. As a result,
unamortized balances of $258,900 of deferred financing fees and $972,836 of debt
discount and beneficial conversion features associated with the previous Laurus
credit facility were netted along with the value of the new warrants issued of
$344,155 against the new term debt related to the portion of the new debt that
refinanced the Laurus debt and related accrued interest totaling $8,503,416 to
provide a net carrying amount for that portion of the debt of
$6,927,525. The carrying amount of the loan is being amortized over
the term of the loan at a constant effective interest rate of 20% applied to the
future cash payments specified by the new loan.
The
carrying value of the Laurus debt under the Credit Facility at June 30, 2008 was
$12,310,486 and does not equate to the total cash payments of $12,799,662 due
under the debt as a result of accounting for a troubled debt
restructure.
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Notes
to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Quarter
Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
(Unaudited)
As
previously disclosed, all of GreenMan Technologies of Tennessee, Inc.’s assets
were sold in September 2005 and substantially all of GreenMan Technologies of
Georgia, Inc.’s assets were sold as of March 1, 2006. All proceeds from these
sales were retained by Laurus, our secured lender, and these subsidiaries have
no assets. As of June 30, 2008, approximately seventeen vendors of
these subsidiaries had commenced legal action, primarily in the state courts of
Georgia, in attempts to collect approximately $1.9 million of past due amounts,
plus accruing interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs, all relating to various
services rendered to these subsidiaries. Although GreenMan Technologies,
Inc. itself was not a party to any of these vendor relationships, three of the
plaintiffs, representing approximately $900,000 of these claims, have named
GreenMan Technologies, Inc. as a defendant along with GreenMan Technologies of
Georgia, Inc.
As of
June 30, 2008, nine vendors have secured judgments in their favor aggregating
approximately $1.55 million against GreenMan Technologies of Georgia, Inc.,
including a summary judgment for approximately $890,000 against GreenMan
Technologies, Inc. While GreenMan Technologies, Inc. believes it has valid
defenses to these claims, as well as against any similar or related claims that
may be made against us in the future, we did not receive proper notice of the
summary judgment against us and therefore were unable to timely appeal the
judgment. Management therefore determined it to be in the best interests of
GreenMan Technologies, Inc. to reach settlement on this judgment rather than to
attempt to appeal the judgment for lack of proper notice. On March 28, 2008,
GreenMan Technologies, Inc. agreed to a cash settlement of $450,000 with
$100,000 paid upon signing the settlement agreement and nine additional monthly
payments of $38,889 commencing on April 30, 2008 and ending on December 31,
2008. As of June 30, 2008, the balance due under this agreement was $233,334.
Upon receipt of the final payment, the plaintiff has agreed to mark the judgment
satisfied with the appropriate courts, at which time we anticipate recording a
gain on settlement of approximately $165,000.
On June
27, 2008, GreenMan Technologies of Georgia, Inc. filed for liquidation under
Chapter 7 of the federal bankruptcy laws in the Bankruptcy Court of the Middle
District of Georgia and a trustee was appointed. In July 2008 a
Meeting of Creditors was held and we are awaiting the trustee’s final
report. As a result of the bankruptcy proceedings all pending
litigation is stayed and GreenMan Technologies of Georgia, Inc. was
deconsolidated from our financial statements as of June 30, 2008. (See Note
5).
In
addition to the foregoing, we are subject to routine claims from time to time in
the ordinary course of our business. We do not believe that the
resolution of any of the claims that are currently known to us will have a
material adverse effect on our company or on our financial
statements.
Common
Stock Transactions
On
October 1, 2007, we issued 8,000,000 shares of our unregistered common stock
valued at $2,800,000 (at a price of $.35 which was the closing price of our
stock on the date of issuance) in connection with the acquisition of Welch
Products. (See Note 4.)
Authorized
Shares
As of
June 30, 2008, 30,880,435 shares of our common stock were issued and
outstanding, and we had approximately 9,590,364 additional shares reserved for
future issuance. These reserved shares relate to the following: 3,054,462 shares
for issuance upon exercise of awards granted under our 1993 Stock Option Plan,
1996 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan and 2005 Stock Option Plan and
6,535,902 shares for issuance upon exercise of other stock options and stock
purchase warrants. On April 2, 2008, our shareholders approved an amendment to
our Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized
shares of common stock from 40,000,000 to 60,000,000 shares.
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
Notes
to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Quarter
Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
(Unaudited)
9.
|
Stockholders’
Equity – (Continued)
|
Stock
Options
We
maintain stock-based compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note
11 to the consolidated financial statements in our 2007 Annual Report filed on
Form 10-KSB. As permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, we previously
had elected to continue with the accounting methodology prescribed by Accounting
Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees.” On October 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) “Share-based Payment” using the modified
prospective method and have applied the required fair value methodology to all
stock option and equity award plans. We use the Black-Scholes option valuation
to determine the fair value of share based payments granted after October 1,
2006. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded stock
based compensation expense of $28,183 and $103,750 respectively and $9,195 and
$27,300, respectively for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007 as a
result of the adoption of SFAS 123(R). The unamortized compensation costs at
June 30, 2008 was $413,111.
During
the three months ended December 31, 2007, we granted options to several
employees to purchase an aggregate of 670,000 shares of the our common stock at
an exercise price of $.35 to per share, which represented the closing price of
our stock on the date of each respective grant. The options were granted under
the 2005 Stock Option Plan, have a ten-year term and vest equally over a
five-year period from date of grant. The fair value of the options at the date
of grant in aggregate was $160,000 and assumptions utilized to determine such
value were (a) risk free interest rate of 4.33%, (b) expected life of 7.5 years,
(c) expected volatility of 64% and (d) weighted average fair value
of $.24 per option granted.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2008, we granted options to our Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement to purchase an
aggregate of 100,000 shares of the our common stock at an exercise price of $.34
per share, which represented the closing price of our stock on the date of the
grant. The options were granted under the 2005 Stock Option Plan, have a
ten-year term and vest immediately on the date of grant. The fair value of the
options at the date of grant in aggregate was $19,200 and assumptions utilized
to determine such value were (a) risk free interest rate of 2.7%, (b) expected
life of 5 years, (c) expected volatility of 65% and (d) weighted average fair
value of $.19 per option granted.
We use
historical volatility as we believe it is more reflective of market conditions
and a better indicator of volatility and use estimated stock option forfeitures
based on historical experience. We will continue to use the
simplified calculation of expected life described in the Staff Accounting
Bulletin No (s) SAB No. 107 and SAB No. 110, Share-Based
Payments until we have enough historical data necessary to provide a
reasonable estimate of expected life.
In
conjunction with the acquisition of Welch Products (See Note 4) on October 1,
2007, we established a new reporting structure whereby we now have two
reportable operating segments: (1) tire recycling and (2) molded
recycled rubber products. We have
identified the tire recycling and molded recycled rubber product as operating
segments for which discrete financial information is available. Each operating
segment has its respective management team.
The
tire recycling operations collect, process and market scrap tires in whole,
shredded or granular form. We are paid a fee to collect, transport and process
scrap tires (i.e.,
collection/processing revenue) in whole or into two inch or smaller rubber chips
which are then sold (i.e., product
revenue).
The molded recycled rubber products
operations manufacture, install and market branded recycled content products and
services that provide schools and other political subdivisions viable solutions
for safety, compliance, and accessibility. Pursuant to SFAS
No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”,
our Chief Executive Officer has been identified as the chief operating decision
maker (CODM) as he assesses the performance of the segments and decides how to
allocate resources to the segments. Income (loss) from operations is the measure
of profit and loss that our CODM uses to assess performance and make decisions.
Assets are not a measure used to assess the performance of the company by the
CODM; therefore we will report assets by segment in our disclosures. Income
(loss) from operations represents the net sales less the cost of sales and
direct operating expenses incurred within the operating segments as well the
allocation of some but not all corporate operating expenses. These unallocated
costs include certain corporate functions (certain legal, accounting, wage,
public relations and interest expense) are included in the results below under
Corporate and other in the reconciliation of operating results. Management does
not consider unallocated Corporate and other in its management of segment
reporting.
GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes
to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Quarter
Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
(Unaudited)
10.
|
Segment
Information – (Continued)
|
The
following table provides total assets for our operating segments as of
:
Total
assets:
|
|
June
30,
2008
|
|
|
September
30,
2007
|
|
Tire
recycling
|
|
$ |
11,358,399 |
|
|
$ |
9,034,960 |
|
Molded
recycled rubber products
|
|
|
6,271,247 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Corporate
and other
|
|
|
294,228 |
|
|
|
256,243 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
17,923,874 |
|
|
$ |
9,291,203 |
|
The
following table provides net sales and income from operations for our operating
segments:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
June
30
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Net
sales;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tire
recycling
|
|
$ |
6,671,451 |
|
|
$ |
5,320,269 |
|
|
$ |
15,616,828 |
|
|
$ |
13,671,561 |
|
Molded
recycled rubber products
|
|
|
886,110 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,093,596 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Corporate
and other
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total net sales
|
|
$ |
7,557,561 |
|
|
$ |
5,320,269 |
|
|
$ |
17,710,424 |
|
|
$ |
13,671,561 |
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Income (loss) from
continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tire
recycling
|
|
$ |
1,143,888 |
|
|
$ |
644,688 |
|
|
$ |
1,835,757 |
|
|
$ |
1,229,825 |
|
Molded
recycled rubber products
|
|
|
(142,640 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(686,780 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Corporate
and other
|
|
|
(369,728 |
) |
|
|
(432,936 |
) |
|
|
(1,379,244 |
) |
|
|
(1,685,398 |
) |
Total income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
631,520 |
|
|
$ |
211,752 |
|
|
$ |
(230,267 |
) |
|
$ |
(455,573 |
) |
We
recorded a provision for state income tax expense of approximately $52,000
during the nine months ended June 30, 2008 based on certain subsidiary state
income tax obligations.
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of
Operation
In
September 2005, due to the magnitude of continued operating losses, our Board of
Directors approved plans to divest the operations of our GreenMan Technologies
of Georgia, Inc. subsidiary and dispose of its respective assets. Accordingly,
we have classified all remaining liabilities associated with our Georgia entity
and it’s results of operations as discontinued operations for all periods
presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. On June 27, 2008, our
Georgia subsidiary filed for liquidation under Chapter 7 of the federal
bankruptcy laws in the Bankruptcy Court of the Middle District of Georgia. As a
result of the bankruptcy proceedings we have relinquished control of our Georgia
subsidiary to the Bankruptcy Court and therefore have de-consolidated
substantially all remaining obligations from our financial statements as of June
30, 2008. On
October 1, 2007, we acquired Welch Products, Inc. in exchange for 8,000,000
newly issued shares of our commons stock. The results described below include
the operations of Welch since October 1, 2007.
The
following information should be read in conjunction with the unaudited
consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in Item 1 of
this Quarterly Report, and the audited consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations contained in our Form 10-KSB, as amended, filed for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007.
Results
of Operations
Three
Months ended June 30, 2008 Compared to the Three Months ended June 30,
2007
Net sales
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 increased $2,237,292 or 42% to
$7,557,561 as compared to net sales of $5,320,269 for the quarter ended June 30,
2007. The increase is primarily attributable to a 25% increase in overall tire
derived end product revenues during the three months ended June 30, 2008 and a
15% increase in scrap tire volume (we processed approximately 3.5 million
passenger tire equivalents during the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as compared to
approximately 3.0 million passenger tire equivalents during the same period last
year). The remaining increase in revenue was attributable to the inclusion of
approximately $886,000 of revenue associated with Welch, our newly acquired
subsidiary. The results for the three months ended June 30, 2007 included
approximately $54,000 of revenue and 39,000 passenger tire equivalents
associated with an Iowa scrap tire cleanup project which was completed during
that quarter.
Gross
profit for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $2,514,560 or 33% of net
sales, compared to $1,742,556 or 33% of net sales for the three
months ended June 30, 2007. The results for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 included Welch, which had a gross profit of $284,769 or 32% of its
net sales.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008
increased $433,196 to $1,377,737 or 18% of net sales, compared to $944,541 or
18% of net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase was
primarily attributable to the inclusion of $393,898 associated with Welch, including an ongoing significant
investment in sales and marketing efforts to promote the Welch patented products
and establish market presence.
Interest
and financing expense for the three months ended June 30, 2008 decreased $62,409
to $497,293, compared to $559,702 during the three months ended June 30, 2007.
The decrease was primarily due to reduced interest rates and outstanding
principal.
As a result of the foregoing, our
income from continuing operations after income taxes increased $419,768 or
almost 200% to $631,520 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to
$211,752 for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
During
the three months ended June 30, 2008 we recognized income from discontinued
operations of $2,360,930 associated with a one time, non-cash gain resulting
from the de-consolidation of our inactive Georgia subsidiary which filed Chapter
7 bankruptcy during the quarter. During the quarter ended June 30, 2007 we
reached agreements with several Georgia vendors regarding remaining past due
amounts resulting in approximately $102,000 of income from discontinued
operations.
Our
net income for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $2,992,450 or $.10 per
basic share as compared to net income of $313,435 or $.01 per basic share for
the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Nine
Months ended June 30, 2008 Compared to the Nine Months ended June 30,
2007
Net sales
for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 increased $4,038,863 or 30% to
$17,710,424 as compared to the net sales of $13,671,561 for the nine months
ended June 30, 2007. The increase is primarily attributable to a 26% increase in
overall tire derived end product revenues during the nine months ended June 30,
2008 and a 7% increase in scrap tire volume (we processed approximately 9.5
million passenger tire equivalents during the nine months ended June 30, 2008 as
compared to approximately 9.0 million passenger tire equivalents during the same
period last year). The remaining increase in revenue was attributable to the
inclusion of approximately $2,093,596 of revenue associated with Welch, our
newly acquired subsidiary. The results for the nine
months ended June 30, 2007 included approximately $404,000 of revenue and
205,000 passenger tire equivalents associated with an Iowa scrap tire cleanup
project which was completed during that period.
Gross
profit for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, was $5,300,255 or 30% of net
sales, compared to $4,001,128 or 29% of net sales for the nine months
ended June 30, 2007. The results for the nine months ended June 30,
2008 included Welch, which had a gross profit of $622,744 or 30% of its net
sales.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended June 30, 2008,
increased $1,182,947 to $3,996,505 or 23% of net sales, compared to $2,813,558
or 21% of net sales for the nine months ended June 30, 2007. The increase was
attributable to the inclusion of $1,237,290 associated with Welch, including a significant investment in
sales and marketing efforts to promote the Welch patented products and establish
market presence. These increases were offset by reduced wages and
performance based incentives.
As a
result of the foregoing, we had operating income from continuing operations of
$1,303,750 during the nine months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to operating
income of $1,187,570 for the nine months ended June 30, 2007.
Interest
and financing expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, decreased
$116,072 to $1,489,457 compared to $1,605,529 during the nine months ended June
30, 2007. The decrease was primarily due to reduced interest rates and
outstanding principal.
We
recorded a provision for state income tax expense of approximately $52,000
during the nine months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to approximately $32,000
for the same period last year.
As a
result of the foregoing, our loss from continuing operations after income taxes
decreased $225,306 or 49% to $230,267 for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 as
compared to a loss of $455,573 for the nine months ended June 30,
2007.
During
the nine months ended June 30, 2008, we recognized income from discontinued
operations of $2,360,930 associated with a one time, non-cash gain resulting
from the de-consolidation of our inactive Georgia subsidiary which filed Chapter
7 bankruptcy in June 2008. During the nine months ended June 30, 2007 we reached
agreements with several Georgia vendors regarding remaining past due amounts
resulting in approximately $112,000 of income from discontinued
operations.
Our net
income for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, was $2,130,663 or $.07 per basic
share as compared to a net loss of $344,063 or $.02 per basic share for the nine
months ended June 30, 2007.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of
June 30, 2008, we had $543,057 in cash and cash equivalents and a working
capital deficiency of $11,322,565 which reflects the inclusion of
$9.8 million of term debt due our primary lender, Laurus Master Fund,
Ltd., under the terms of our Credit Facility which matures June 30,
2009. Commencing October 1, 2008, our principal payments due to Laurus under
this term debt are scheduled to increase substantially. We are currently in
discussions with Laurus regarding an initial 12-month extension in the term of
the credit facility as well as maintaining our current level of monthly
principal payments through the remainder of the existing term and the potential
extension term. If we are unable to restructure our remaining
principal payments with Laurus or obtain additional financing, our ability to
maintain our current level of operations could be materially and adversely
affected and we may be required to adjust our operating plans
accordingly.
We
understand our continued existence is dependent on our ability to generate
positive operating cash flow and achieve profitable status on a sustained basis
for all operations. We believe our efforts to achieve these goals, have been
positively impacted by our divestiture of historically unprofitable operations
during fiscal 2006 and 2005, as evidenced by the fact we have been profitable in
four of our last five consecutive quarters. In addition, during the nine months
ended June 30, 2008, we have made a significant investment in sales and
marketing efforts to promote the Welch patented products and establish market
presence.
The
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows reflect events for the nine months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007 as they affect our liquidity. During the nine months
ended June 30, 2008, net cash used by operating activities was
$359,305. Our net income for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 was
$2,130,663, including a one time, non-cash gain of $2,360,930 associated with
the de-consolidation of our Georgia subsidiary. Our cash flow was positively
impacted by the following non-cash expenses and changes to our working capital:
$1,711,137 of depreciation and amortization and an increase in accounts payable
and accrued expenses of $396,995. These changes were offset by a $1,338,177
increase in product inventory, which is not unusual as we typically build
inventory prior to our seasonally stronger second half. In addition, accounts
receivable increased $659,386 reflecting stronger revenues during the seasonally
strong quarter. During the nine months ended June 30, 2007, net cash used by
operating activities was $484,035. While our net loss was $344,063 our overall
cash flow was positively impacted by the following non-cash expenses and changes
to our working capital: $1,100,403 of depreciation and amortization which
partially offset a $744,668 increase in product inventory and a $531,706
increase in accounts receivable. It is not unusual during the seasonally slower
first half of our fiscal year to build inventory for the pending crumb season,
which typically begins during our third fiscal quarter as evidenced by the
increase in accounts receivable.
Net cash
used by investing activities was $1,241,439 for the nine months ended June 30,
2008, reflecting the net purchase of equipment of $1,312,010 and $68,571 of net
cash acquired in the Welch transaction. Net cash used by investing activities
was $719,406 for the nine months ended June 30, 2007, reflecting the purchase of
$769,445 of equipment offset by proceeds from the sale of equipment of
$50,039.
Net cash
provided by financing activities was $1,767,037 during the nine months ended
June 30, 2008, reflecting an increase in our working capital line of $2,999,662,
which offset normal debt payments including the payoff of approximately $467,000
of Welch debt in conjunction with the acquisition and capital lease
repayments. Net cash provided by financing activities was $764,139
during the nine months ended June 30, 2007, reflecting the initial drawdown of
our line of credit which offset normal debt and capital lease
repayments.
In order
to reduce our operating costs, address our liquidity needs and return to
profitable status, we have implemented and/or are in the processing of
implementing the following actions:
Divestiture
of Unprofitable Operations
Due to
the magnitude of the continuing operating losses incurred by our Georgia and
Tennessee during fiscal 2005 ($3.4 million and $1.8 million, respectively)
subsidiaries and our California subsidiary ($3.2 million since inception) in
fiscal 2006, our Board of Directors determined it to be in the best interest of
our company to discontinue all southeastern and west coast
operations and dispose of their respective operating
assets.
The divestiture of our Tennessee
operations was substantially completed during the fiscal year ended September
30, 2005 and the divestiture of our Georgia and California
subsidiaries was completed during fiscal 2006.
Credit
Facility Refinancing
On June
30, 2006, we entered into a $16 million amended and restated credit facility
with Laurus (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility consists of a $5
million non-convertible secured revolving note and an $11 million secured
non-convertible term note.
The revolving note has a term of three
years from the closing, bears interest on any outstanding amounts at the prime
rate published in The Wall Street
Journal from time to time
plus 2%, with a minimum rate of 8%. The amount we may borrow at any time under
the revolving note is based on our eligible accounts receivable and our eligible
inventory with an advance rate equal to 90% of our eligible accounts receivable
(90 days or less) and 50% of finished goods inventory up to a maximum of $5
million less such reserves as Laurus may reasonably in its good faith judgment
deem necessary from time to time.
The term note has a maturity date of
June 30, 2009 and bears interest at the prime rate published in The Wall Street
Journal from time to time
plus 2% with a minimum rate of 8%. Interest on the loan is payable monthly
commencing August 1, 2006. Principal will be amortized over the term of the
loan, commencing on July 2, 2007, with minimum monthly payments of principal as
follows: (i) for the period commencing on July 2, 2007 through June 2008,
minimum payments of $150,000; (ii) for the period from July 2008 through June
2009, minimum payments of $400,000; and (iii) the balance of the principal shall
be payable on the maturity date. In May 2007, Laurus agreed to reduce the
monthly principal payments required under Credit Facility during the period of
July 2007 to June 2008 from $150,000 to $100,000 per month. Laurus also agreed
to reduce the monthly principal payments required during the period of July 2008
to September 2008 from $400,000 to $100,000 per month. The net reduction of
$1,500,000 will be deferred and payable at the June 2009 maturity
date.
In addition, we have agreed to
make an excess cash flow repayment as follows: no later than 95 days following
the end of each fiscal year beginning with the fiscal year ending on September
30, 2007, we have agreed to make a payment equal to 50% of (a) our aggregate net
operating cash flow generated in such fiscal year less (b) our aggregate capital
expenditures in such fiscal year (up to a maximum of 25% of the net operating
cash flow calculated in accordance with clause (a) of this sentence.
Laurus agreed to waive this provision for the year ended September 30,
2007. The term loan may be prepaid
at any time without penalty.
In connection with the Credit Facility,
we also issued to Laurus a warrant to purchase up to 3,586,429 shares of our
common stock at an exercise price equal to $.01 per share. Laurus has agreed
that it will not, on any trading day, be permitted to sell any common stock
acquired upon exercise of this warrant in excess of 10% of the aggregate number
of shares of the common stock traded on such trading day. Previously issued
warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,380,000 shares of our common stock were
canceled as part of these transactions. The amount of our common stock Laurus
may hold at any given time is limited to no more than 4.99% of our outstanding
capital stock. This limitation may be waived by Laurus upon 61 days notice to us
and does not apply if an event of default occurs and is continuing under the
Credit Facility.
On
January 25, 2007, we filed the registration statement under the Securities Act
of 1933 relating to the 3,586,429 shares underlying the June 30, 2006 warrant as
well as 553,997 shares issuable to another shareholder upon exercise of a
warrant. The registration statement was declared effective on February 6,
2007.
Pursuant
to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 15, “Accounting by Debtors
and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructuring” (“SFAS 15”) the Credit Facility
has been accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring. It was determined that,
because the effective interest rate of the Credit Facility was lower than that
of the previous credit facility therefore indicating a concession was granted by
Laurus, we are viewed as a passive beneficiary of the restructuring, and no new
transaction has occurred. Under SFAS 15, a modification of terms "is neither an
event that results in a new asset or liability for accounting purposes nor an
event that requires a new measurement of an existing asset or liability." Thus,
from a debtor's standpoint, SFAS 15 calls for a modification of the terms of a
loan to be accounted for prospectively. As a result, unamortized balances
of $258,900 of deferred financing fees and $972,836 of debt discount
and beneficial conversion features associated with the previous Laurus credit
facility were netted along with the value of the new warrants issued of $344,155
against the new term debt related to the portion of the new debt that refinanced
the Laurus debt and related accrued interest totaling $8,503,416 to provide a
net carrying amount for that portion of the debt of $6,927,525. The
carrying amount of the loan will be amortized over the term of the loan at a
constant effective interest rate of 20% applied to the future cash payments
specified by the new loan. (See Note 7 to the Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements).
Subject to applicable cure
periods, amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility are subject to acceleration
upon certain events of default, including: (i) any failure to pay when due any
amount we owe under the New Credit Facility; (ii) any material breach by us of
any other covenant made to Laurus; (iii) any misrepresentation, in any material
respect, made by us to Laurus in the documents governing the New Credit
Facility; (iv) the institution of certain bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings
by or against us; (v) the entry of certain monetary judgments greater than
$50,000 against us that are not paid or vacated for a period of 30 business
days; (vi) suspensions of trading of our common stock; (vii) any failure to
deliver shares of common stock upon exercise of the warrant; (viii) certain
defaults under agreements related to any of our other indebtedness; and (ix)
changes of control of our company. Substantial fees and penalties are payable to
Laurus in the event of a default.
Our obligations under the Credit
Facility are secured by first priority security interests in all of the assets
of our company and all of the assets of our GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota,
Inc. and GreenMan Technologies of Iowa, Inc. subsidiaries, as well as by pledges
of the capital stock of those subsidiaries. In January 2008,
we granted Laurus additional security interests in the assets of
Welch Products and its subsidiaries, which increased our borrowing base under
the revolving note described above.
Effects
of Inflation and Changing Prices
Generally,
we are exposed to the effects of inflation and changing prices. Given
the largest component of our collection and disposal costs is transportation, we
have been adversely affected by the significant increases in the cost of
fuel. Additionally, because we rely on floating-rate debt for certain
financing arrangements, rising interest rates in fiscal 2007 had a negative
effect on our performance. We have generally been unaffected by interest rate
declines in the first six months of fiscal 2008, because our Credit
Facility bears interest at a minimum rate of 8.0%.
Based on
our fiscal 2008 operating plan, available working capital, revenues from
operations and anticipated availability under our working capital line of credit
with Laurus, we believe we will be able to satisfy our cash requirements through
fiscal 2008 at which time our Laurus principal payments increase substantially.
We are currently in discussions with Laurus regarding an initial 12 month
extension in the term of the credit facility as well as maintaining our current
level of monthly principal payments through the remainder of the existing term
and the potential extension term. If we are unable to restructure our
remaining principal payments with Laurus or obtain additional financing, our
ability to maintain our current level of operations could be materially and
adversely affected and we may be required to adjust our operating plans
accordingly.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We lease
various facilities and equipment under cancelable and non-cancelable short and
long term operating leases which are described in Note 7 to our Audited
Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Form 10-KSB, as amended, filed for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2007.
Cautionary
Statement
Information
contained or incorporated by reference in this document contains forward-looking statements regarding
future events and the future results of GreenMan Technologies, Inc.
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995,
and are based on current
expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections and the beliefs and
assumptions of our management. Words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “target,”
“goal,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “seek,” “estimate,” “will,”
“likely,” “may,” “designed,” “would,” “future,” “can,” “could” and other similar
expressions that are predictions of or indicate future events and trends or
which do not relate to historical matters are intended to identify such
forward-looking statements. These statements are based on management’s current
expectations and beliefs and involve a number of risks, uncertainties, and
assumptions that are difficult to predict; consequently actual
results may differ materially from those projected, anticipated, or
implied.
Factors
That May Affect Future Results
Risks
Related to our Business
We
have been profitable in the most recent quarter and four of the last consecutive
quarters, lost money in the previous eighteen consecutive quarters. We may need
additional working capital if we do not maintain profitability, which if not
received, may force us to curtail operations.
As of
June 30, 2008, we had $543,057 in cash and cash equivalents and a working
capital deficiency of $11,322,565 of which reflects the inclusion of $9.8
million of term debt due our primary lender, Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., under the
terms of our credit facility which matures June 30, 2009. Commencing October 1,
2008, our principal payments due to Laurus under this term debt are scheduled to
increase substantially. We are currently in discussions with Laurus regarding an
initial 12-month extension in the term of the credit facility as well as
maintaining our current level of monthly principal payments through the
remainder of the existing term and the potential extension term. If
we are unable to restructure our remaining principal payments with Laurus or
obtain additional financing, our ability to maintain our current level of
operations could be materially and adversely affected and we may be required to
adjust our operating plans accordingly.
We
understand our continued existence is dependent on our ability to generate
positive operating cash flow and achieve profitable status on a sustained basis
for all operations.
The
delisting of our common stock by the American Stock Exchange has limited our
stock’s liquidity and could substantially impair our ability to raise
capital.
Our common stock ceased trading on the
American Stock Exchange on June 15, 2006 and was delisted by the Exchange on
July 6, 2006 as result of our failure to maintain stockholders’ equity in excess
of $4 million as required by the Exchange’s Company Guide when a company has
incurred losses in three of the four most recent fiscal years. During
the period of June 15 through June 20, 2006 we were traded on the Pink Sheet. On
June 21, 2006, we began trading on the Over-The-Counter-Bulletin-Board under the
symbol “GMTI”. We believe the delisting has limited our
stock’s liquidity and could substantially impair our ability to raise
capital.
We
have substantial indebtedness to Laurus Master Fund secured by substantially all
of our assets. If an event of default occurs under the secured notes
issued to Laurus, Laurus may foreclose on our assets and we may be forced to
curtail or cease our operations or sell some or all of our assets to repay the
notes.
On June
30, 2006, we entered into a $16 million amended and restated credit facility
with Laurus (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility consists of a $5
million non-convertible secured revolving note and an $11 million secured
non-convertible term note.
Subject
to certain grace periods, the notes and agreements provide for the following
events of default (among others):
|
·
|
failure
to pay interest and principal when
due;
|
|
·
|
an
uncured breach by us of any material covenant, term or condition in any of
the notes or related agreements;
|
|
·
|
a
breach by us of any material representation or warranty made in any of the
notes or in any related agreement;
|
|
·
|
any
form of bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding is instituted by or against
us;
|
|
·
|
any
money judgment or similar final process is filed against us for more than
$50,000 that remains unvacated, unbonded or unstayed for a period of 30
business days;
|
|
·
|
suspension
of our common stock from our principal trading market for five consecutive
days or five days during any ten consecutive
days;
|
|
·
|
any failure to deliver shares of
common stock upon exercise of the
warrant;
|
|
·
|
certain defaults under agreements
related to any of our other indebtedness;
and
|
|
·
|
changes of control of our
company.
|
In the
event of a future default under our agreements with Laurus, Laurus may enforce
its rights as a secured party and we may lose all or a portion of our assets, be
forced to materially reduce our business activities or cease
operations.
We
will require additional funding to grow our business, which funding may not be
available to us on favorable terms or at all. If we do not obtain funding when
we need it, our business will be adversely affected. In addition, if we have to
sell securities in order to obtain financing, the rights of our current holders
may be adversely affected.
We will
have to seek additional outside funding sources to satisfy our future financing
demands if our operations do not produce the level of revenue we require to
maintain and grow our business. We cannot assure that
outside funding will be available to us at the time that we need it and in the
amount necessary to satisfy our needs, or, that if such funds are available,
they will be available on terms that are favorable to us. If we are unable to
secure financing when we need it, our business will be adversely affected and we
may need to discontinue some or all of our operations. If we have to issue
additional shares of common stock or securities convertible into common stock in
order to secure additional funding, our current stockholders will experience
dilution of their ownership of our shares. In the event that we issue securities
or instruments other than common stock, we may be required to issue such
instruments with greater rights than those currently possessed by holders of our
common stock.
We may not be able to
successfully integrate our
recent acquisition of Welch Products, Inc into GreenMan and realize anticipated
benefits.
On
October 1, 2007, we acquired Welch Products, Inc., a company headquartered in
Carlisle, Iowa, which specializes in design, product development, and
manufacturing of environmentally responsible products using recycled materials,
primarily recycled rubber. Since inception, Welch has invested
significant amounts in sales and marketing efforts to promote their patented
products and establish market presence but have not yet reached sustained
profitability. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, Welch lost
approximately $142,000 and $687,000 respectively. We understand our consolidated
performance will be negatively impacted unless Welch begins generating positive
operating cash flow and achieves profitable status on a sustained basis for all
Welch operations.
Improvement
in our business depends on our ability to increase demand for our products and
services.
Factors
that could limit demand for our products and services are adverse events or
economic or other conditions affecting markets for our products and services,
potential delays in product development, product and service flaws, changes in
technology, changes in the regulatory environment and the availability of
competitive products and services.
Our
business is subject to extensive and rigorous government regulation; failure to
comply with applicable regulatory requirements could substantially harm our
business.
Our tire
recycling activities are subject to extensive and rigorous government regulation
designed to protect the environment. The establishment and operation of plants
for tire recycling are subject to obtaining numerous permits and complying with
environmental and other government regulations. The process of obtaining
required regulatory approvals can be lengthy and expensive. The Environmental
Protection Agency and comparable state and local regulatory agencies actively
enforce environmental regulations and conduct periodic inspections to determine
compliance with government regulations. Failure to comply with applicable
regulatory requirements can result in, among other things, fines, suspensions of
approvals, seizure or recall of products, operating restrictions, and criminal
prosecutions. Furthermore, changes in existing regulations or adoption of new
regulations could impose costly new procedures for compliance, or prevent us
from obtaining, or affect the timing of, regulatory approvals.
The
market in which we operate is highly competitive, fragmented and decentralized
and our competitors may have greater technical and financial
resources.
The
market for our services is highly competitive, fragmented and
decentralized. Many of our competitors are small regional or local
businesses. Some of our larger competitors may have greater financial
and technical resources than we do. As a result, they may be able to
adapt more quickly to new or emerging technologies, changes in customer
requirements, or devote greater resources to the promotion and sale of their
services. Competition could increase if new companies enter the
markets in which we operate or our existing competitors expand their service
lines. These factors may limit or prevent any further development of our
business.
Our
success depends on the retention of our senior management and other key
personnel.
Our
success depends largely on the skills, experience and performance of our senior
management. The loss of any key member of senior management could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
Seasonal
factors may affect our quarterly operating results.
Seasonality
may cause our total revenues to fluctuate. We typically process fewer
tires during the winter and experience a more pronounced volume reduction in
severe weather conditions. In addition, a majority of our crumb
rubber is used for playground and athletic surfaces, running tracks and
landscaping/groundcover applications which are typically installed during the
warmer portions of the year. Similar seasonal or other patterns may develop in
our business.
Inflation
and changing prices may hurt our business.
Generally,
we are exposed to the effects of inflation and changing prices. Primarily
because the largest component of our collection and disposal costs is
transportation, we have been adversely affected by significant increases in the
cost of fuel. Additionally, because we rely on floating-rate debt for certain
financing arrangements interest rates fluctuations will have an effect on our
financial performance.
If
we acquire other companies or businesses we will be subject to risks that could
hurt our business.
A
significant part of our business strategy entails future acquisitions or
significant investments in businesses that offer complementary products and
services. Promising acquisitions are difficult to identify and
complete for a number of reasons. Any acquisitions completed by our company may
be made at a premium over the fair value of the net assets of the acquired
companies and competition may cause us to pay more for an acquired business than
its long-term fair market value. There can be no assurance that we will be able
to complete future acquisitions on terms favorable to us or at all. In addition,
we may not be able to integrate our Welch Products acquisition or any future
acquired businesses, at all or without significant distraction of management
into our ongoing business. In order to finance acquisitions, it may be necessary
for us to issue shares of our capital stock to the sellers of the acquired
businesses and/or to seek additional funds through public or private financings.
Any equity or debt financing, if available at all, may be on terms which are not
favorable to us and, in the case of an equity financing or the use of our stock
to pay for an acquisition, may result in dilution to our existing
stockholders.
As
we grow, we are subject to growth related risks.
We are
subject to growth-related risks, including capacity constraints and pressure on
our internal systems and personnel. In order to manage current operations and
any future growth effectively, we will need to continue to implement and improve
our operational, financial and management information systems and to hire,
train, motivate, manage and retain employees. We may be unable to manage such
growth effectively. Our management, personnel or systems may be inadequate to
support our operations, and we may be unable to achieve the increased levels of
revenue commensurate with the increased levels of operating expenses associated
with this growth. Any such failure could have a material adverse impact on our
business, operations and prospects. In addition, the cost of opening new
facilities and the hiring of new personnel for those facilities could
significantly decrease our profitability, if the new facilities do not generate
sufficient additional revenue.
If we fail to maintain an effective
system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our
financial results or prevent fraud. As a result, current and potential
shareholders could lose confidence in our financial reporting, which would harm
our business and the trading price of our stock.
Effective internal controls are
necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and effectively minimize
the possibility of fraud and its impact on our company. If we cannot continue to
provide financial reports or effectively minimize the possibility of fraud, our
business reputation and operating results could be harmed.
In addition, we will be required as currently
proposed to include the management reports on internal controls as part of our
annual report for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, pursuant to
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which requires, among other things,
that we maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting and
procedures. In particular, we must perform system and process evaluation and
testing of our internal controls over financial reporting to allow management
and our independent registered public accounting firm (commencing with the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009) to report on the effectiveness of our
internal controls over financial reporting, as required by Section 404. Our
compliance with Section 404 will require that we incur substantial accounting
expense and expend significant management efforts.
We cannot be certain as to the timing of
the completion of our evaluation and testing, the timing of any remediation
actions that may be required or the impact these may have on our operations.
Furthermore, there is no precedent available by which to measure compliance
adequacy. If we are not able to implement the requirements relating to internal
controls and all other provisions of Section 404 in a timely fashion or
achieve adequate compliance with these requirements or other requirements of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we
might become subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities
such as the Securities and Exchange Commission or any securities exchange on
which we may be trading at that time, which action may be injurious to our
reputation and affect our financial condition and decrease the value and
liquidity of our common stock.
Risks
Related to the Securities Market
Our
stock price may be volatile, which could result in substantial losses for our
shareholders.
Our
common stock is thinly traded and an active public market for our stock may not
develop. Consequently, the market price of our common stock may be highly
volatile. Additionally, the market price of our common stock could
fluctuate significantly in response to the following factors, some of which are
beyond our control:
|
·
|
we
are now traded on the OTC Bulletin
Board;
|
|
·
|
changes
in market valuations of similar
companies;
|
|
·
|
announcements
by us or by our competitors of new or enhanced products, technologies or
services or significant contracts, acquisitions, strategic relationships,
joint ventures or capital
commitments;
|
|
·
|
regulatory
developments;
|
|
·
|
additions
or departures of senior management and other key
personnel;
|
|
·
|
deviations
in our results of operations from the estimates of securities analysts;
and
|
|
·
|
future
issuances of our common stock or other
securities.
|
We
have options and warrants currently outstanding. Exercise of these
options and warrant will cause dilution to existing and new
shareholders. Future sales of common stock by Laurus and our existing
stockholders could result in a decline in the market price of our
stock.
As of June 30, 2008, we had options and
warrants outstanding to purchase 9,590,364 additional shares for future
issuance. These reserved shares relate to the following: 3,054,462 shares for
issuance upon exercise of awards granted under our 1993 Stock Option Plan, 1996
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan and 2005 Stock Option Plan
and 6,535,902 shares for issuance upon exercise of other stock options and stock
purchase warrants.
The exercise of our options and warrants
will cause additional shares of common stock to be issued, resulting in dilution
to investors and our existing stockholders. As of June 30, 2008, approximately
15 million shares of our common stock were eligible for sale in the public
market. This represents approximately 48% of our outstanding shares of common
stock. We have registered an additional 2,951,905 shares of common stock
issuable upon exercise of remaining warrants owned by certain stockholders,
therefore increasing the potential total shares of our common stock eligible for
resale in the public market to approximately 18 million. Sales of a significant
number of shares of our common stock in the public market could result in a
decline in the market price of our common stock, particularly in light of the
illiquidity and low trading volume in our common stock.
Our
directors, executive officers and principal stockholders own a significant
percentage of our shares, which will limit the ability of other stockholders to
influence corporate matters.
Our
directors, executive officers and other principal stockholders owned
approximately 25 percent of our outstanding common stock as of June 30, 2008.
Accordingly, these stockholders could have a significant influence over the
outcome of any corporate transaction or other matter submitted to our
stockholders for approval, including mergers, consolidations and the sale of all
or substantially all of our assets and also could prevent or cause a change in
control. The interests of these stockholders may differ from the interests of
other stockholders. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, Laurus
acquired 1,154,098 shares of our common stock upon partial exercise of its
warrant on a cashless basis. In addition, Laurus can elect to acquire up to
4,811,905 shares of our outstanding stock by exercising its warrants for an
aggregate exercise price of $48,119. If Laurus were to acquire those shares,
they would represent 16% of our outstanding shares of common stock at June 30,
2008. In addition, the limited number of shares held in public float affects the
liquidity of our common stock. Third parties may be discouraged from
making a tender offer or bid to acquire us because of this concentration of
ownership.
We
have never paid dividends on our capital stock and we do not anticipate paying
any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
We
have paid no cash dividends on our capital stock to date and we currently intend
to retain our future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our
business. In addition, our agreements with Laurus prohibit the payment of cash
dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will
be shareholders’ sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.
Anti-takeover provisions in our
charter documents and Delaware law could discourage potential acquisition
proposals and could prevent, deter or delay a change in control of our
company.
Certain
provisions of our Restated Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws could have
the effect, either alone or in combination with each other, of preventing,
deterring or delaying a change in control of our company, even if a change in
control would be beneficial to our stockholders. Delaware law may
also discourage, delay or prevent someone from acquiring or merging with
us.
Environmental
Liability
There are
no known material environmental violations or assessments.
Item
3 Controls
and Procedures
Our
management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934) as of June 30, 2008. In designing and evaluating our
disclosure controls and procedures, we recognized that any controls and
procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily
applied its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible
controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer
and chief financial officer concluded that as of June 30, 2008, our disclosure
controls and procedures were (1) designed to ensure that material information
relating to the company, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to our chief executive officer and chief financial officer by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report was being
prepared and (2) effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.
No change
in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
As
previously disclosed, all of GreenMan Technologies of Tennessee, Inc.’s assets
were sold in September 2005 and substantially all of GreenMan Technologies of
Georgia, Inc.’s assets were sold as of March 1, 2006. All proceeds from these
sales were retained by Laurus, our secured lender, and these subsidiaries have
no assets. As of June 30, 2008, approximately seventeen vendors of
these subsidiaries had commenced legal action, primarily in the state courts of
Georgia, in attempts to collect approximately $1.9 million of past due amounts,
plus accruing interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs, all relating to various
services rendered to these subsidiaries. Although GreenMan Technologies,
Inc. itself was not a party to any of these vendor relationships, three of the
plaintiffs, representing approximately $900,000 of these claims, have named
GreenMan Technologies, Inc. as a defendant along with GreenMan Technologies of
Georgia, Inc.
As of
June 30, 2008, nine vendors have secured judgments in their favor aggregating
approximately $1.55 million against GreenMan Technologies of Georgia, Inc.,
including a summary judgment for approximately $890,000 against GreenMan
Technologies, Inc. While GreenMan Technologies, Inc. believes it has valid
defenses to these claims, as well as against any similar or related claims that
may be made against us in the future, we did not receive proper notice of the
summary judgment against us and therefore were unable to timely appeal the
judgment. Management therefore determined it to be in the best interests of
GreenMan Technologies, Inc. to reach settlement on this judgment rather than to
attempt to appeal the judgment for lack of proper notice. On March 28, 2008,
GreenMan Technologies, Inc. agreed to a cash settlement of $450,000 with
$100,000 paid upon signing the settlement agreement and nine additional monthly
payments of $38,889 commencing on April 30, 2008 and ending on December 31,
2008. Upon receipt of the final payment, the plaintiff has agreed to mark the
judgment satisfied with the appropriate courts, at which time we anticipate
recording a gain on settlement of approximately $150,000.
On June
27, 2008, GreenMan Technologies of Georgia, Inc. filed for liquidation under
Chapter 7 of the federal bankruptcy laws in the Bankruptcy Court of the Middle
District of Georgia and a trustee was appointed. In July 2008 a
Meeting of Creditors was held and we are awaiting the trustee’s final
report. As a result of the bankruptcy proceedings all pending
litigation is stayed and GreenMan Technologies of Georgia, Inc. was
de-consolidated from our financial statements as of June 30, 2008.
In
addition to the foregoing, we are subject to routine claims from time to time in
the ordinary course of our business. We do not believe that the
resolution of any of the claims that are currently known to us will have a
material adverse effect on our company or on our financial
statements.
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
We conducted
our Annual Meeting of Stockholders on April 1, 2008. The matters
considered at the meeting and the results for each vote were as
follows:
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
Vote 1 – Election
of the Board of Directors
Maurice
E. Needham
Lew
Boyd
Dr.
Allen Kahn
Lyle
Jensen
Nicholas
DeBenedictis
|
|
23,982,043
23,989,154
24,484,182
24,834,038
21,066,403
|
|
2,240,926
2,233,815
1,738,787
1,388,931
5,156,566
|
|
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote 2 –
To consider and act upon a
proposal to amend the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to
increase the authorized shares of the Company's Common Stock from 40
million to 60 million
|
|
24,721,002
|
|
1,431,326
|
|
70,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote 3 – To consider and act upon a
proposal to amend the 2005 Stock Option Plant to increase the authorized
shares to be issued from 2 million to 3.5 million
|
|
16,494,747
|
|
1,950,189
|
|
28,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote 4 – To
Ratify the selection of Schechter,Dokken, Kanter, Andrews &
Selcer, Ltd. as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008
|
|
24,991,916
|
|
907,044
|
|
323,608
|
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1(1)
|
|
Restated
Certificate of Incorporation as filed with the Secretary of State of the
State of Delaware on May 1, 2003, as amended
|
|
|
|
31.1(1)
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule
15d-14(a)
|
|
|
|
31.2(1)
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule
15d-14(a)
|
|
|
|
32.1(1)
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer under 18 U.S.C Section 1350
|
|
|
|
32.2(1)
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C Section 1350
|
|
|
|
Form
8-K dated and filed June 27, 2008, with respect to Item 8.01
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, the Registrant certifies that
it has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.
By: GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
/s/ Lyle
Jensen
Lyle
Jensen
Chief
Executive Officer
By: GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
/s/ Charles E.
Coppa
Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer,
Secretary
APPENDIX E
VOTING AGREEMENT
Execution
Version
STOCKHOLDER
VOTING AGREEMENT
THIS STOCKHOLDER VOTING
AGREEMENT (this “Agreement") is made this 12th
day of September, 2008, by and among Liberty Tire Services, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (“LTS”); Liberty Tire Services
of Ohio, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary
of LTS (“Purchaser”);
GreenMan Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“GTI”); GreenMan Technologies
of Iowa, Inc., an Iowa corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of GTI (“GTIA”); GreenMan Technologies
of Minnesota, Inc., a Minnesota corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of GTI
(“GTMN” and, together
with GTIA, “Sellers”);
and the stockholders of GTI listed on Schedule A to this
Agreement (collectively, the “Stockholders” and each,
individually, a “Stockholder”).
WHEREAS,
as of the date hereof, the Stockholders are the legal and beneficial owners of
record of shares of Common Stock of GTI as set forth on Schedule A attached
hereto (such shares, together with any shares of Common Stock or other voting or
equity securities of GTI hereafter acquired by any Stockholder prior to the
termination of this Agreement, being referred to herein collectively as the
“Shares”);
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Asset Purchase
Agreement dated as of the date hereof (the “Purchase Agreement”), by and
among LTS, Purchaser, GTI, and Sellers, Purchaser has agreed to acquire
substantially all of the assets related to or used in connection with Sellers’
businesses of tire collection, disposal, shredding, processing, recycling and
sale of used tires, including without limitation the production of tire derived
fuel chips, tire derived mulch, tire shreds, crumb rubber and other tire derived
feedstock, located primarily in Iowa and Minnesota, although they also conduct
business in Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, North
Dakota, South Dakota and Wisconsin (such assets, as more specifically defined in
the Purchase Agreement, the “Purchased
Assets”);
WHEREAS, as a condition to the
willingness of Purchaser to enter into the Purchase Agreement, Purchaser has
required that the Stockholders agree, and in order to induce the Purchaser to
enter into the Purchase Agreement, the Stockholders are willing to agree, during
the Term (as defined below), to vote in favor of the adoption of the Purchase
Agreement, the sale and purchase of the Purchased Assets and the transactions
contemplated by the Purchase Agreement and each other agreement contemplated
thereby (the “Contemplated
Transactions”) and to restrict the transfer or disposition of any of the
Shares; and
WHEREAS, capitalized terms used in this
Agreement without definition shall have such meanings as ascribed to them under
the Purchase Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
foregoing and the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and for
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is acknowledged by
each party hereto, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereby
agree, severally and not jointly, as follows:
Section
1. Voting of
Shares. Each Stockholder covenants and agrees that during the
period beginning on the date hereof and ending on the earlier to occur of (i)
the Effective Time and (ii) the termination of the Purchase Agreement in
accordance with its terms (such date, the “Expiration Date”), at any
regular, special or adjourned meeting of the stockholders of GTI, however called
(a “Stockholders’
Meeting”), and in any action by written consent of the stockholders of
GTI (a “Written
Consent”), such Stockholder will vote, or cause to be voted by proxy or
otherwise, all of its respective Shares (i) in favor of the adoption of the
Purchase Agreement (as the Purchase Agreement may be modified or amended from
time to time in a manner not adverse to the Stockholders) and the approval of
the Contemplated Transactions, and (ii) against any Acquisition Proposal and
against any other action or transaction that may reasonably be construed to make
the consummation of the Contemplated Transactions by Purchaser more difficult or
expensive. Prior to the Expiration Date, no Stockholder shall enter
into any agreement or understanding with any person or vote or give instructions
in any manner inconsistent with this Section 1.
Section
2. Transfer of
Shares. Each Stockholder covenants and agrees that during the
Term that such Stockholder will not directly or indirectly (i) sell, assign,
transfer (including by merger, interspousal disposition pursuant to a domestic
relations proceeding or otherwise by operation of law), pledge, encumber or
otherwise dispose of any of its Shares, (ii) deposit any of its Shares into a
voting trust or enter into a voting agreement or arrangement with respect to the
Shares or grant any proxy or power of attorney with respect thereto which is
inconsistent with this Agreement or (iii) enter into any contract, option or
other voluntary arrangement or undertaking with respect to the direct or
indirect sale, assignment, transfer (including by merger, interspousal
disposition pursuant to a domestic relations proceeding or otherwise by
operation of law) or other disposition of any Shares. In the event
any party to this Agreement dies prior to the Expiration Date, then this
Agreement shall be binding on the descendants, executors, administrators, heirs
and assigns of such party. Any action or attempted action in
violation of this Agreement shall be null and void.
Section
3. Representations and
Warranties of the Stockholders. Each Stockholder on its own
behalf hereby severally represents and warrants to Purchaser, solely with
respect to itself and its ownership of its Shares, but not with respect to any
other Stockholder, as follows:
(a) Ownership of
Shares. On the date hereof, and except as specifically set
forth on Schedule
A attached hereto, such Shares are owned of record, legally, beneficially and
exclusively by such Stockholder. Such Stockholder has sole
voting power, without restrictions, with respect to all of such
Shares. Such Stockholder does not beneficially own any shares of
capital stock of GTI other than the Shares.
(b) Power; Binding
Agreement. Such Stockholder has the legal capacity, power and
authority to enter into and perform all of its obligations under this Agreement.
This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by such
Stockholder and constitutes a valid and binding obligation of such Stockholder,
enforceable against such Stockholder in accordance with its terms.
(c) No
Encumbrances. As of the date hereof the Shares are, and at all
times during the Term the Shares will be, free and clear of any Security Rights or other
Encumbrances.
Section
4. No
Solicitation. During the Term, each Stockholder agrees, in his
or her capacity as a stockholder of GTI, that he or she will not, nor will he or
she authorize or permit any of his or her agents and representatives to,
directly or indirectly, (a) initiate, solicit or encourage any inquiries or the
making of any Acquisition Proposal, (b) enter into any agreement with respect to
any Acquisition Proposal, or (c) participate in any discussions or negotiations
regarding, or furnish to any person any information with respect to, or take any
other action to facilitate any inquiries or the making of any proposal that
constitutes, or may reasonably be expected to lead to, any Acquisition
Proposal. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each Stockholder who serves
as an officer or director of GTI may take such actions as are allowed under the
provisions of Section 3.7 of the Purchase Agreement.
Section
5. Termination. The
term of this Agreement shall commence on the date as of which this agreement is
executed and shall continue in effect until the Expiration Date (the “Term”); provided, however, that at any time
from and after the date hereof this Agreement may be terminated by the written
agreement of the parties hereto, effective as of the date of such
writing.
Section
6. Specific
Performance. Each party expressly understands and agrees that
any breach of this Agreement would cause irreparable harm to the other parties
and that, in addition to any other remedy which such party might have, an
aggrieved party shall be entitled to injunctive relief for, and to prevent, any
such breach, without the necessity of posting any bond or other
security. The breaching party hereby agrees that should any aggrieved
party institute any action or proceeding for injunctive or similar equitable
relief to enforce these covenants, the breaching party waives and agrees not to
assert the claims or defenses that the aggrieved party has an adequate remedy at
law or that the aggrieved party will not suffer irreparable damage.
Section
7. Fiduciary
Duties. Each Stockholder is signing this Agreement solely in
such Stockholder’s capacity as an owner of its respective Shares, and nothing
herein shall prohibit, prevent or preclude such Stockholder from taking or not
taking any action in his capacity as an officer or director of GTI.
Section
8. Miscellaneous.
(a) All notices given or made in connection
with this Agreement shall be in writing. Delivery of written
notices shall be effective
upon receipt. All deliveries shall be made to the following
addresses:
if to LTS or
the Purchaser,
to:
Liberty
Tire Services, LLC
Dominion
Tower, Suite 3100
625
Liberty Avenue
Pittsburgh,
PA 15222
Telephone: 412-562-0148
Facsimile: 412-562-0248
Attn: Jeffrey
D. Kendall and General Counsel
E-mail: JKendall@LibertyTire.com
With a copy (which shall not constitute
notice) to:
K&L
Gates LLP
Henry W.
Oliver Building
535
Smithfield Street
Pittsburgh,
PA 15222
Attn: David
L. Forney, Esq.
Telephone: 412-355-6330
Facsimile: 412-355-6501
E-mail: David.Forney@klgates.com
if to GTI or
Sellers, to:
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
7 Kimball
Lane, Building A
Lynnfield,
MA 01940
Attn: Charles
E. Coppa, CFO
Telephone: 781-224-2411
Facsimile: 781-224-0114
E-mail: Coppagmt@aol.com
With a copy (which shall not constitute
notice) to:
Morse,
Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
Reservoir
Place
1601
Trapelo Road
Waltham,
MA 02451
Attn: Carl
Barnes, Esq.
Telephone: 781-622-5930
Facsimile: 781-622-5933
E-mail: cbarnes@mbbp.com
If to the
Stockholders:
At the addresses set forth on Schedule A attached
hereto,
With a copy (which shall not constitute
notice) to:
GreenMan
Technologies, Inc.
7 Kimball
Lane, Building A
Lynnfield,
MA 01940
Attn: Charles
E. Coppa, CFO
Telephone: 781-224-2411
Facsimile: 781-224-0114
E-mail: Coppagmt@aol.com
or, at such other address as any of the
parties shall have furnished in writing to the other parties
hereto.
(b) This Agreement and the agreements
specifically referred to herein, or in the Purchase Agreement, supersede any and
all oral or written agreements or understandings heretofore made relating to the
subject matter hereof and constitute the entire agreement of the parties
relating to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement may not be
amended, modified or rescinded except by an instrument in writing signed by each
of the parties hereto.
(c) If any provision of this Agreement shall
be declared void or unenforceable by any judicial or administrative authority,
the validity of any other provision shall not be affected
thereby. The parties hereto further agree to replace such void or
unenforceable provision of this Agreement with a valid and enforceable provision
that will achieve, to the extent possible, the mutual economic, business and
other purposes of such void or unenforceable provision.
(d) This
Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their
respective successors and permitted assigns.
(e) This
Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of Delaware, without regard to its conflict of laws
doctrines.
(f) The
parties shall cooperate in good faith to resolve any dispute that may arise
under this Agreement; provided, that if any party
believes such dispute cannot be resolved by mutual agreement, then such dispute
shall be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the Streamlined Arbitration
Rules and Procedures (the “Rules”) of the American Arbitration
Association. Any such arbitration shall be conducted in Wilmington,
Delaware or such other place as is mutually acceptable to the Stockholders and
the Purchaser by one arbitrator mutually acceptable to the parties involved in
such arbitration or, if such parties are unable to agree on an arbitrator, the
arbitrator shall be appointed in accordance with the rules of the American
Arbitration Association. The decision and award of any such
arbitrator (which may include specific performance and injunctive relief) shall
be made in writing, and shall be final and valid, nonappealable, binding upon
the parties involved in such arbitration, and enforceable by any such party in
any court of competent jurisdiction. Notwithstanding any provision of
this Agreement or the Rules to the contrary, no party will be eligible to
receive, and the arbitrator shall not have the authority to award, exemplary,
punitive, incidental, indirect or consequential damages, and the arbitrator
shall not have the authority to amend this Agreement. In the event
that any dispute regarding this Agreement is resolved by arbitration pursuant to
this Section 8(f), the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the
non-prevailing party (or parties) the fees, costs and expenses (including, but
not limited to, the reasonable fees and expenses of counsel) incurred by the
prevailing party in connection with such action.
(g) Notwithstanding
the provisions of, and in addition to the rights set forth in, Section 8(f),
in the event of a breach of the
provisions of this
Agreement by a party to this Agreement during the Term, any non-breaching party
shall have the right to specific performance and injunctive relief, it being
acknowledged and agreed that money damages will not provide an adequate
remedy.
(h) In the event litigation is maintained by
a party to this Agreement against any other party to enforce an arbitration
award rendered under
Section 8(f) or to seek specific performance of injunctive relief under Section
8(g), then the party prevailing in such litigation shall be entitled to recover
from the non-prevailing party reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of
suit.
(i) No
remedy conferred by any of the specific provisions of this Agreement is intended
to be exclusive of any other remedy, and each and every remedy will be
cumulative and will be in addition to every other remedy given here or now or
hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute or otherwise. The election
of any one or more remedies will not constitute a waiver of the right to pursue
other available remedies.
(j) This Agreement may be executed in
several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of
which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
(k) No
Stockholder shall have any liability for any misrepresentation or breach by any
other Stockholder hereunder.
[Signature
Page to follow]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have
caused this Agreement to be duly executed under seal as of the date first
written above.
LIBERTY
TIRE SERVICES, LLC
BY: /s/Jeffrey D. Kendall
NAME: Jeffrey
D. Kendall
TITLE: CEO
LIBERTY
TIRE SERVICES OF OHIO, LLC
BY: /s/Jeffrey D. Kendall
NAME: Jeffrey
D. Kendall
TITLE: CEO
GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
BY: /s/Lyle Jensen
NAME: Lyle
Jensen
TITLE: CEO
GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES OF
MINNESOTA,
INC.
BY: /s/Lyle Jensen
NAME: Lyle
Jensen
TITLE: CEO
GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES OF
IOWA,
INC.
BY: /s/Lyle Jensen
NAME: Lyle
Jensen
TITLE: CEO
STOCKHOLDERS:
/s/Maurice E. Needham
Maurice
E. Needham
/s/Lyle Jensen
Lyle
Jensen
/s/Allen Kahn
Dr. Allen
Kahn
/s/Lew F. Boyd
Lew F.
Boyd
/s/Nicholas
DeBenedictis
Nicholas
DeBenedictis
/s/Charles E. Coppa
Charles
E. Coppa
SCHEDULE
A
TO
STOCKHOLDER VOTING
AGREEMENT
Stockholder
|
|
Shares
Held
|
Maurice
E. Needham
c/o
Greenman Technologies, Inc.
7
Kimball Lane, Building A
Lynnfield,
MA 01940
|
|
1,268,783
shares of Common Stock
|
Lyle
Jensen
c/o
Greenman Technologies, Inc.
7
Kimball Lane, Building A
Lynnfield,
MA 01940
|
|
635,052
shares of Common Stock
|
Dr.
Allen Kahn
c/o
Greenman Technologies, Inc.
7
Kimball Lane, Building A
Lynnfield,
MA 01940
|
|
4,348,431
shares of Common Stock
|
Lew
F. Boyd
c/o
Greenman Technologies, Inc.
7
Kimball Lane, Building A
Lynnfield,
MA 01940
|
|
275,678
shares of Common Stock
|
Nicholas
DeBenedictis
c/o
Greenman Technologies, Inc.
7
Kimball Lane, Building A
Lynnfield,
MA 01940
|
|
397,454
shares of Common Stock
|
Charles
E. Coppa
c/o
Greenman Technologies, Inc.
7
Kimball Lane, Building A
Lynnfield,
MA 01940
|
|
387,828
shares of Common Stock
|
PROXY FOR SPECIAL MEETING OF GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
SOLICITATION ON BEHALF OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
The
undersigned, revoking all proxies, hereby appoints Lyle Jensen and Charles Coppa
and each of them (with full power to act alone), proxies and attorneys-in-fact
with full power of substitution to each, for and in the name of the undersigned
to vote all shares of Common Stock of GreenMan Technologies, Inc. that the
undersigned would be entitled to vote if then personally present at the Special
Meeting of Shareholders of GreenMan Technologies, Inc. to be held on November
13, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., local time, in the Youngstown Room at the Sleep
Inn & Suites, 5850 Morning Star Court, Pleasant Hill, Iowa 50327, or any
adjournment thereof, upon all subjects that may properly come before the Special
Meeting, including the matters described in the Proxy Statement furnished
herewith, subject to any directions indicated on this card. If no
directions are given, the proxies will vote for the approval of the following
proposals and, at their discretion, on any other matter that may properly come
before the meeting.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY
RECOMMENDS A VOTE IN FAVOR OF ALL ITEMS.
PROPOSAL 1:
|
To approve the sale of
substantially all of the assets of GreenMan Technologies of Iowa, Inc. and
GreenMan Technologies of Minnesota, Inc. that relate to our scrap tire
recycling business pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement dated
September 12, 2008 by and among Liberty Tire Services, LLC, Liberty
Tire Services of Ohio, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Liberty Tire
Services, LLC, GreenMan Technologies, Inc. and two of our wholly owned
subsidiaries, GreenMan Technologies of Iowa, Inc., and GreenMan
Technologies of Minnesota, Inc.:
|
o FOR
|
o AGAINST
|
o ABSTAIN
|
PROPOSAL 2:
|
To approve one or more adjournments of
the Special Meeting if deemed necessary to facilitate the approval of
Proposal No. 1, including to permit the solicitation of
additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the
Special Meeting to establish a quorum or to approve
Proposal No. 1:
|
o FOR
|
o AGAINST
|
o ABSTAIN
|
Please
Sign on the Reverse Side and Return this Proxy Promptly in the Enclosed
Envelope.
This
Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors, and when properly
executed will be voted as directed herein. If no direction is given, this Proxy
will be voted FOR all Proposals.
Date:
________________________
___________________________________
(Signature)
___________________________________
(Signature,
if held jointly)
(Please sign exactly as name appears
hereon. If the stock is registered in the names of two or more persons, each
should sign. Executors, administrators, trustees, guardians, attorneys and
corporate officers should include their titles.)
Detach above card,
sign, date and mail in postage paid envelope provided.