Edgar Filing: ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC

Form S-4

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 20, 2005

Registration No. 333 -

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM S-4

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware

3674

94-1692300

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(Primary Standard Industrial

Classification Code Number)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

One AMD Place

Sunnyvale, California 94088-3453

(408) 749-4000

(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)

Harry Wolin, Esq.

Senior Vice President, General Counsel

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

One AMD Place

Sunnyvale, California 94088-3453

(408) 749-4000

(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Agent for Service)

Copies to:

Tad J. Freese

Latham & Watkins LLP

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, California 94111

(415) 391-0600

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this registration statement.

If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box. ¨

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration number of the earlier effective registration number for the same offering. ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier, effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

Title of Each Class of

Securities to be Registered

Amount to be

Registered

Proposed

Offering Price

Per Note

Proposed

Aggregate

Offering Price

Amount of

Registration Fee

7.75% Senior Notes due 2012

600,000,000

100

%⁽¹⁾

600,000,000

70,620

(1)	Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(f).

The Registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act or until this registration statement shall become effective on such date as the SEC, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities, and we are not soliciting offers to buy these securities, in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED JANUARY 20, 2005

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS

LOGO

OFFER TO EXCHANGE

up to $600,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its

7.75% Senior Notes due 2012,

which have been registered under the Securities Act,

for any and all of its outstanding 7.75% Senior Notes due 2012

•

The exchange offer expires at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on , 2005, unless extended.

•

We will exchange all outstanding private notes that are validly tendered and not validly withdrawn for an equal principal amount of a new series of notes, referred to in this prospectus as exchange notes, which are registered under the Securities Act.

•

The exchange offer is not subject to any conditions other than that it not violate applicable law or any applicable interpretation of the staff of the SEC.

•

You may withdraw tenders of outstanding notes at any time before the exchange offer expires.

•

The exchange of notes will not be a taxable event for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

•

We will not receive any proceeds from the exchange offer.

•

The terms of the exchange notes are substantially identical to the outstanding private notes, except for transfer restrictions and registration rights relating to the outstanding notes.

•

You may tender outstanding notes only in denominations of $1,000 and multiples of $1,000.

•

Our affiliates may not participate in the exchange offer.

Please refer to “ Risk Factors” beginning on page 15 of this prospectus for a description of the risks you should consider before exchanging the notes.

We are not making this exchange offer in any state where it is not permitted.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved of the notes or determined that this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

We have not authorized any dealer, salesperson or other person to give any information or make any representations to you other than the information contained in this prospectus. You must not rely on any information or representations not contained in this prospectus as if we had authorized it. This prospectus does not offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities other than the registered notes to which it relates, nor does it offer to buy any notes in any jurisdiction to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction.

The information contained in this prospectus is current only as of the date on the cover page of this prospectus, and may change after that date.

This prospectus incorporates important business and financial information about us that is not included in or delivered with this prospectus. This information is available without charge to you upon written or oral request. If you would like a copy of any of this information, please submit your request to Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., One AMD Place, Sunnyvale, California 94088, Attention: Legal Department, or call (408) 749-4000 and ask to speak to someone in our Legal Department. In addition, to obtain timely delivery of any information you request, you must submit your request no later than , 2005, which is five business days before the date the exchange offer expires.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


		Page
Prospectus Summary		1
Risk Factors		15
The Exchange Offer		32
Use of Proceeds		41
Capitalization		42
Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data		43
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		45
Business		78
Management		96
Description of Certain Indebtedness		99
Description of the Notes		105
Book-Entry; Delivery and Form		140
United States Federal Income Tax Considerations		142
Plan of Distribution		143
Legal Matters		143
Experts		143
Available Information		144
Incorporation by Reference		144

Each broker-dealer that receives exchange notes for its own account in exchange for private notes, which the broker-dealer acquired as a result of market-making activities or other trading activities, must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of the exchange notes. The letter of transmittal accompanying this prospectus states that by so acknowledging and by delivering a prospectus, a broker-dealer will not be deemed to admit that it is an “underwriter” within the meaning of the Securities Act. A broker-dealer may use this prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, in connection with resales of exchange notes received in exchange for private notes which the broker-dealer acquired as a result of market-making or other trading activities. We have agreed that, starting on the expiration date and ending on the close of business 180 days after the expiration date, we will make this prospectus available to any broker-dealer for use in connection with any such resale. See “Plan of Distribution.”

MARKET AND INDUSTRY DATA

Market and industry data throughout this prospectus were obtained from a combination of third-party industry data and good faith estimates of management based on these data. While we believe these industry data and estimates of management are reliable, neither we nor the initial purchasers have independently verified this data. Accordingly, neither we nor the initial purchasers make any representations as to the accuracy or completeness of these data. We are not aware of any misstatements regarding market or industry data contained in this prospectus; however, such data involves risks and uncertainties and is subject to change based on various factors, including those factors discussed in the “Risk Factors” section of this prospectus.

TRADEMARKS

AMD, the AMD Arrow logo, AMD Opteron, AMD Athlon, AMD Sempron, AMD Turion, AMD PowerNow!, Alchemy, Geode and combinations thereof are trademarks of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Spansion and MirrorBit are trademarks of Spansion LLC. HyperTransport is a licensed trademark of the HyperTransport Technology Consortium. Windows is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other jurisdictions. MIPS is a registered trademark of MIPS Technologies, Inc. Other names are for informational purposes only and may be trademarks of their respective owners.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Discussions contained in this prospectus and the documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties and should not be relied upon as predictions of future events as we cannot assure you that the events or circumstances reflected in these statements will be achieved or will occur. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology including “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “approximately,” “intends,” “plans,” “pro forma,” “estimates,” or “anticipates” or the negative of these words and phrases or other variations of these words and phrases or comparable terminology or by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and beliefs and involve numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. The forward-looking statements relate to, among other things:

•

our sales, operating results and anticipated cash flows;

•

the adequacy of resources to fund operations and capital expenditures;

•

marketing, general and administrative expenditures;

•

customer and market acceptance of our AMD Opteron^™, AMD Athlon^™ 64, AMD Turion^™ 64 and AMD Sempron^™ microprocessors;

•

customer and market acceptance of Spansion^™ Flash memory products based on MirrorBit^™ and floating gate technology;

•

our ability to remain competitive and maintain our market position;

•

our ability to maintain and develop key relationships with our customers;

•

the ability to produce our microprocessor and Flash memory products in the volumes and mix required by the market;

•

our ability to maintain the level of investment in research and development and capacity that is required to remain competitive;

•

our ability to transition to new products and manufacturing process technologies in a timely and effective way;

•

our ability to achieve cost reductions in the amounts and in the timeframes anticipated;

•

the process technology transitions in our wafer fabrication facilities; and

•

our ability to gain market share in high growth global markets such as China, Latin America, India and Eastern Europe.

See “Risk Factors,” as well as such other risks and uncertainties as are detailed in our other documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus, for a discussion of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis only. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements.

iii

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

As used in this prospectus, references in this prospectus to “us,” “we,” “our,” the “Company” or “AMD” shall mean Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries, including Spansion LLC, unless the context indicates otherwise. The summary highlights selected information contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus. This summary is not complete and does not contain all the information that you should consider before exchanging your notes. You should read this entire prospectus, including the risk factors, the financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus, as well as the information incorporated by reference, before tendering your private notes in exchange for exchange notes.

Our Company

We are a leading semiconductor company with manufacturing facilities in the United States, Europe and Asia, and sales offices throughout the world. We design, manufacture and market industry-standard digital integrated circuits, or ICs, that are used in diverse product applications such as desktop and mobile personal computers, or PCs, workstations, servers, communications equipment such as mobile telephones and automotive and consumer electronics. Our products consist primarily of:

•

microprocessors, which are used for control and computing tasks, and complementary chipset components, which perform essential logic functions that support the microprocessors; and

•

Flash memory devices, which are used to store data and programming instructions.

In addition, we are targeting the embedded processor market for personal connectivity devices.

Our major direct microprocessor customers are original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, such as Acer, eMachines, Fujitsu-Siemens, Hewlett-Packard and Sun Microsystems. Our major direct Flash memory customers include five of the top seven mobile phone manufacturers. For the nine months ended September 26, 2004, we had approximately $3.7 billion of consolidated net sales. We are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “AMD.”

Our Industry

The Microprocessor Market

A microprocessor is an IC that serves as the central processing unit, or CPU, of a computer. It generally consists of millions of transistors that process data and control other devices in the system. The performance of a microprocessor is a critical factor impacting the performance of a PC and other similar devices. The principal indicators of microprocessor performance are work-per-cycle, or how many instructions are executed per cycle, and clock speed, representing the rate at which its internal logic operates, measured in units of hertz, or cycles processed per second. Other factors impacting microprocessor performance include memory size, data access speed and power consumption.

Emerging trends in the microprocessor market include:

•

64-bit computing. For nearly the last ten years, microprocessors have had 32-bit processing capabilities. While 32-bit processors have historically been sufficient, we believe that they will face challenges as new data and memory-intensive consumer and enterprise software applications gain market popularity. Microprocessors with 64-bit processing capabilities enable systems to have greater performance by allowing software applications and operating systems to access more memory and process more data.

•

Dual-core processors. Over the last ten years as microprocessors have increased in transistor density and overall performance capabilities, they have increasingly faced power consumption challenges. The

expected introduction of dual-core processors, consisting of two processor cores on one semiconductor die, provides an attractive method of increasing processor performance with minimal increase in power consumption.

Microprocessors are essential components of both PCs and servers, with the greatest demand for microprocessors today coming from PC manufacturers. In 2003, the global market for microprocessors used in PCs was $20.8 billion according to International Data Corporation, or IDC. IDC expects the global market for microprocessors used in PCs to increase to $31.4 billion by 2008, representing a compound annual growth rate of 8.6 percent from 2003. According to IDC, the majority of this growth is expected to be driven by increased demand for mobile PCs, with microprocessors used in mobile PCs being expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 18.2 percent from 2003 to 2008. In addition, according to Gartner, server unit shipments are expected to grow at a 9.0 percent compound annual growth rate from 2003 to 2008. Accordingly, we believe that there will be increased demand for microprocessors from server manufacturers as enterprises continue to upgrade their networks.

The Flash Memory Market

Flash memory devices store data and instructions and retain information after electrical power is shut off. Flash memory can be used to provide storage of control programs and system-critical data in communication devices such as mobile telephones and routers. There are two major types of Flash memory employed in the market today: Boolean logic-based NOR (Not Or) Flash memory and NAND (Not And) Flash memory. According to Gartner, in 2003, global NOR Flash memory sales were $6.8 billion and global NAND Flash memory sales were $4.1 billion. NOR Flash memory is generally more reliable than NAND Flash memory and less prone to data corruption. NOR Flash memory is typically used to store program code in communication devices such as mobile telephones and consumer products such as DVD players. NAND Flash memory has generally been less expensive to manufacture and is typically used in devices that require high-capacity data storage such as memory cards for digital cameras and MP3 players. Within the Flash memory market, we sell NOR Flash memory products. However, we have designed a new architecture called ORNAND based on our MirrorBit technology that we believe will enable us to offer products that combine the best features of both NOR and NAND architectures. We believe that ORNAND will allow us to offer products with higher densities in the NOR Flash memory market and will enable us to enter and compete in end markets traditionally served by NAND.

The global Flash memory market (both NAND technology and NOR technology) has grown significantly over the past five years, from $2.8 billion in 1998 to $10.9 billion in 2003 according to Gartner, representing a compound annual growth rate of 31.5 percent. Gartner projects the global Flash memory market will increase to $22.6 billion in 2008, representing a compound annual growth rate of 15.7 percent from 2003. Over this period, Gartner projects that global sales of NOR Flash memory will grow by 11.0 percent and global sales of NAND Flash memory will grow by 22.0 percent. We believe much of this growth will be driven by an increase in unit shipments and Flash memory content in mobile telephones, growth in unit shipments and Flash memory content for personal connectivity and consumer electronic devices and proliferation of Flash memory within a variety of new automotive applications.

Our Strengths

We believe that the following strengths have enabled us to attain a leading position as a global manufacturer and supplier of microprocessors and Flash memory devices, and will assist us in penetrating the embedded microprocessor market for personal connectivity devices:

Customer-Focused Product Development. We work with customers to identify evolving needs and new applications in order to develop innovative products and features. For example, we developed our AMD64 technology to address increasing customer demand for systems with greater performance. Our AMD64

technology allows both 32-bit and 64-bit computing, enabling our customers to protect their investment by continuing to use their 32-bit software applications while transitioning to a 64-bit platform. Currently more than 40 percent of Forbes 100 companies or their affiliates now use AMD64 processor-based systems to run critical enterprise applications. In Flash memory, we have worked closely with mobile telephone customers to develop products that deliver high performance and functionality at lower price points. We believe that our MirrorBit technology will enable our customers to cost effectively include next-generation applications, such as high-resolution cameras and streaming video, on their mobile telephones.

Technology and Product Innovation. We believe that our strong research and product development capabilities have resulted in innovative IC designs and the creation of advanced products. For example, we led the industry in providing x86 64-bit computing with the introduction of our AMD Opteron microprocessors in April 2003. In addition, we were the first to demonstrate x86 dual-core processor technology, which provides a path for increasing processor performance with a minimal increase in power consumption. In Flash memory, we have designed our ORNAND architecture to provide the high reliability of NOR, read speeds and burst write speeds significantly faster than those of NAND today and the ability to scale to high densities at competitive costs.

Leading Manufacturing Process Technology. We have devoted significant resources to develop manufacturing process technologies used in the production of ICs. In order to meet anticipated microprocessor demand, we are completing the construction of and facilitizing a new 300-millimeter wafer fabrication facility in Dresden, Germany, which will be equipped to manufacture microprocessors at 65-nanometer geometries and below. In addition, we recently upgraded Fab 30 to add incremental capacity at 90-nanometer geometries. For our Flash memory products, we are in volume production on 110-nanometer geometries, and we plan to be in production on 90-nanometer geometries in the second half of 2005.

Key Technology and Manufacturing Relationships. In order to maintain our technology and manufacturing expertise, we have entered into strategic relationships with several companies. Key relationships include:

•

Fujitsu. In June 2003, we established Spansion LLC, a new Flash memory company, which integrated our and Fujitsu’s Flash memory businesses, including our previous Flash memory manufacturing joint venture with Fujitsu called Fujitsu AMD Semiconductor Limited, or FASL. We hold a 60 percent interest in Spansion LLC and Fujitsu holds the remaining 40 percent interest. Spansion LLC is currently a leading provider of NOR Flash memory.

•

IBM. We have a joint development agreement with IBM to develop new microprocessor process technologies, including 65-nanometer and 45-nanometer, to be implemented on silicon wafers, which we deploy in our wafer fabrication facilities.

Strong Market Position. We are one of the largest suppliers of microprocessors and the largest company dedicated exclusively to developing, designing and manufacturing Flash memory. According to IDC, in 2003, we had a market share of 16.5 percent in microprocessors based on unit sales, second to Intel. According to the market research firm iSupply, we were the largest NOR Flash memory supplier by revenue based on the first nine months of 2004, with 25.2 percent of the NOR Flash memory market.

Our Strategy

We intend to continue to leverage our technology, manufacturing expertise and customer relationships to build on our position as a leading provider of microprocessors and Flash memory products, and to penetrate the embedded processor market for personal connectivity devices. We are pursuing the following strategies to achieve these goals:

Expand Our Market Opportunity. Through our continued commitment to research and development of cutting-edge products, we plan to continue to be an innovator in the design of new ICs. We plan to leverage our

technology to expand our market share in existing markets, as well as enter new markets and expand our presence in high growth global markets such as China, Eastern Europe, India and Latin America. Our strategy in each of our operating segments is as follows:

•

Microprocessors. We will seek to increase market acceptance of our AMD64 technology, particularly in the enterprise segment. In addition, we have successfully demonstrated our dual-core processors and we plan to offer commercially dual-core processors for servers and workstations in mid-2005, followed by dual-core processors for the PC market in late 2005. We also intend to invest in our mobile microprocessor product portfolio with increasing emphasis on low-power computing in order to address further the thin-and-light segment.

•

Flash Memory. In the Flash memory sector, we intend to expand our leading position in the NOR Flash memory market as well as leverage our ORNAND architecture based on MirrorBit technology to enter markets traditionally served by NAND Flash memory.

Accelerate New Product Development through Our Customer-Centric Innovation. We are focused on providing new products that assist our customers in adding functionality and enhancing the performance of their products. As we did with our AMD64 and MirrorBit technology, we intend to continue to work closely with our customers to jointly define our next-generation products in order to develop solutions for their technology needs.

Leverage Our Manufacturing and Process Technology Expertise to Support Next-Generation Products. We are focused on developing microprocessor and Flash memory designs using advanced manufacturing process technology. We plan to continue manufacturing products with smaller geometries, such as 90-nanometer geometries and below, on larger silicon wafers, such as 300-millimeter wafers. We believe that using such smaller geometries and larger wafers will result in a lower cost per unit and enhance our competitive advantage.

Continue to Pursue Strategic Alliances. We will continue to pursue strategic technology and manufacturing alliances that provide us with the ability to develop more efficient manufacturing capabilities, offer a stronger product portfolio with next-generation products, and increase market share. We believe these alliances will enable us to continue to improve our cost structure and decrease the risks associated with the development of new products and technologies.

Distinguish and Market Our Brand Name. We seek to increase sales of our products through targeted advertising directed at both business and home users as part of our branding campaign. Through a combination of online media, multimedia, print collateral, public relations activities, trade events and sponsorships, we are also seeking to position ourselves in the market as a leader in innovation driven by customer needs. For example, we seek to distinguish the AMD Athlon 64 brand by marketing our AMD Athlon 64 processors to sophisticated PC users, gamers and enterprises, and our AMD Sempron processors to value-conscious buyers of desktop and notebook PCs. We are also marketing our AMD Opteron processors to server OEMs. In addition, we are marketing our Spansion Flash memory devices to mobile phone and embedded systems markets.

Recent Developments

Results of Operations for the Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year Ended December 26, 2004

On January 18, 2005, we reported net sales of $1.26 billion and operating income of $20 million for the quarter ended December 26, 2004. The net loss of $30 million, or $0.08 per share, for the fourth quarter included charges of approximately $49 million, or $0.13 per share. These charges are primarily associated with the exchange of an aggregate of $201.0 million of our 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2007 for 29,391,261 shares of our common stock and the prepayment premium associated with the prepayment of the full amount owed by our indirect wholly-owned German subsidiary, AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG, under its existing term loan, which was paid using the net proceeds from the sale of the notes. For more

information, see “Use of Proceeds.” For the fiscal year ended December 26, 2004, net sales were approximately $5 billion, a 42 percent increase from the fiscal year ended December 28, 2003. Net income for fiscal year 2004 was $91 million, or $0.25 per share.

Net sales in the fourth quarter increased by two percent compared to the third quarter of 2004 and increased by five percent compared to the fourth quarter of 2003. In the fourth quarter of 2003, we reported sales of $1.21 billion and net income of $43 million, or $0.12 per share. In the third quarter of 2004, we reported sales of $1.24 billion and net income of $44 million, or $0.12 per share. The increase in net sales in the fourth quarter compared to the third quarter of 2004 was primarily attributable to an increase in net sales for Computation Products of nine percent. In addition, in the fourth quarter, net sales of AMD64-based microprocessors increased to 50 percent of total PC processor sales.

Net sales for Computation Products were $730 million in the fourth quarter of 2004, an increase of 26 percent from the fourth quarter of 2003 and an increase of nine percent from $672 million in the third quarter of 2004. Operating income for Computation Products of $89 million in the fourth quarter was flat compared with the third quarter. The growth in net sales for Computation Products was primarily attributable to an increase in unit shipments across all segments, particularly our server and mobile processor products, with strong sales in high-growth global markets.

Net sales for Memory Products were $504 million in the fourth quarter of 2004, a decrease of 11 percent from the fourth quarter of 2003 and a decrease of six percent from $538 million in the third quarter of 2004. Net sales decreased due to an aggressive pricing environment, significantly lower sales in Japan and a delay in qualifying a new product in the wireless segment. Operating loss for Memory Products in the fourth quarter was $39 million, compared to operating income of $15 million in the third quarter of 2004. The average bit density in Spansion Flash memory products grew in the fourth quarter and we shipped a record number of bits, with MirrorBit technology increasing as a percentage of overall bits shipped.

Operating income for the fourth quarter of $20 million declined from $46 million in the fourth quarter of 2003 and from $68 million in the third quarter of 2004. Operating expenses of $498 million increased from $389 million in the fourth quarter of 2003 and from $433 million in the third quarter of 2004. Research and development costs for the fourth quarter increased by nine percent compared to the third quarter largely due to start-up costs associated with our new 300-millimeter fabrication facility, Fab 36, and other server and workstation product development costs. Marketing, general and administrative costs in the fourth quarter increased 21 percent as compared to the third quarter of 2004 primarily due to seasonal merchandising activities, increased marketing investments and costs related to compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Gross margin increased to 41 percent in the fourth quarter of 2004 from 40 percent in the third quarter of 2004 due primarily to increased net sales of Computation Products. Our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments at December 26, 2004 totaled $1.20 billion, compared with $1.19 billion at the end of the third quarter of 2004.

Other Information

We were incorporated under the laws of Delaware on May 1, 1969. Our mailing address and executive offices are located at One AMD Place, Sunnyvale, California 94088, and our telephone number is (408) 749-4000. Our website is www.amd.com. The information contained on our website does not constitute a part of this prospectus.

The Exchange Offer

The Exchange Offer

We are offering to exchange the exchange notes for the outstanding private notes that are properly tendered and accepted. You may tender outstanding private notes only in denominations of $1,000 and multiples of $1,000. We will issue the exchange notes on or promptly after the exchange offer expires. As of the date of this prospectus, $600,000,000 principal amount of private notes is outstanding.

Expiration Date

The exchange offer will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on , 2005, unless extended, in which case the expiration date will mean the latest date and time to which we extend the exchange offer.

Conditions to the Exchange Offer

The exchange offer is not subject to any condition other than that it not violate applicable law or any applicable interpretation of the staff of the SEC. The exchange offer is not conditioned upon any minimum principal amount of private notes being tendered for exchange.

Procedures for Tendering Private Notes

If you wish to tender your private notes for exchange notes pursuant to the exchange offer, you must transmit to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as exchange agent, on or before the expiration date, either:

•

a computer generated message transmitted through The Depository Trust Company’s Automated Tender Offer Program system and received by the exchange agent and forming a part of a confirmation of book-entry transfer in which you acknowledge and agree to be bound by the terms of the letter of transmittal; or

•

a properly completed and duly executed letter of transmittal, which accompanies this prospectus, or a facsimile of the letter of transmittal, together with your private notes and any other required documentation, to the exchange agent at its address listed in this prospectus and on the front cover of the letter of transmittal.

If you cannot satisfy either of these procedures on a timely basis, then you should comply with the guaranteed delivery procedures described below. By executing the letter of transmittal, you will make the representations to us described under “The Exchange Offer—Procedures for Tendering.”

Special Procedures for Beneficial Owners

If you are a beneficial owner whose private notes are registered in the name of a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee and you wish to tender your private notes in the exchange offer, you should contact the registered holder promptly and instruct the registered holder to tender on your behalf. If you wish to tender on your own behalf, you must either (1) make appropriate arrangements to register ownership of the private notes in your name or (2) obtain a properly completed bond power from the registered

holder before completing and executing the letter of transmittal and delivering your private notes.

Guaranteed Delivery Procedures

If you wish to tender your private notes and time will not permit the documents required by the letter of transmittal to reach the exchange agent before the expiration date, or the procedure for book-entry transfer cannot be completed on a timely basis, you must tender your private notes according to the guaranteed delivery procedures described in this prospectus under the heading “The Exchange Offer—Guaranteed Delivery Procedures.”

Acceptance of the Private Notes and Delivery of the Exchange Notes

Subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to the exchange offer, we will accept for exchange any and all private notes which are validly tendered in the exchange offer and not withdrawn before 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date.

Withdrawal Rights

You may withdraw the tender of your private notes at any time before 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date, by complying with the procedures for withdrawal described in this prospectus under the heading “The Exchange Offer—Withdrawal of Tenders.”

U.S. Federal Tax Considerations

The exchange of notes will not be a taxable event for United States federal income tax purposes. For a discussion of certain federal tax considerations relating to the exchange of notes, see “U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.”

Exchange Agent

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., the trustee under the indenture governing the notes, is serving as the exchange agent.

Consequences of Failure to Exchange

If you do not exchange your private notes for exchange notes, you will continue to be subject to the restrictions on transfer provided in the private notes and in the indenture governing the private notes. In general, the private notes may not be offered or sold, unless registered under the Securities Act, except pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws. We do not currently plan to register the private notes under the Securities Act.

Broker-Dealers

Registration Rights Agreement

You are entitled to exchange your private notes for exchange notes with substantially identical terms. This exchange offer satisfies that right. After the exchange offer is completed, you will no longer be entitled to any exchange or registration rights with respect to your private notes.

We explain the exchange offer in greater detail beginning on page 32.

The Exchange Notes

The summary below describes the principal terms of the exchange notes. Certain of the terms and conditions described below are subject to important limitations and exceptions. The “Description of the Notes” section of this prospectus contains a more detailed description of the terms of the exchange notes.

The form and terms of the exchange notes are the same as the form and terms of the private notes, except that the exchange notes will be registered under the Securities Act and, therefore, the exchange notes will not be subject to the transfer restrictions, registration rights and provisions providing for an increase in the interest rate applicable to the private notes. The exchange notes will evidence the same debt as the private notes and are governed by the same indenture as the private notes.

Issuer

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

Notes Offered

$600,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 7.75% Senior Notes due 2012.

Interest Payment Dates

May 1 and November 1 of each year, beginning on May 1, 2005.

Maturity Date

November 1, 2012.

Ranking

The notes are our general unsecured senior obligations. The notes:

•

rank equal in right of payment with all of our current and future unsecured senior debt;

•

are effectively subordinated in right of payment to all of our existing and future secured debt, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such debt;

•

are effectively subordinated to our debt that is guaranteed in the future by our subsidiaries with respect to the assets and earnings of those subsidiaries, including Spansion LLC, our majority-owned subsidiary;

•

are structurally subordinated to all existing and future debt and other liabilities, including trade payables, of our subsidiaries including Spansion LLC; and

•

are senior in right of payment to all of our subordinated obligations, if any.

As of September 26, 2004, after giving effect to the issuance of the private notes and the application of the net proceeds therefrom:

•

we would have had consolidated debt of $2,024 million, approximately $1,503 million of which would have constituted debt directly borrowed by AMD, and approximately $521 million of which would have constituted debt directly borrowed by our subsidiaries;

•

of the debt directly borrowed by AMD as described above, none of such debt would have been secured or guaranteed by any of our subsidiaries;

•

of the debt directly borrowed by our subsidiaries as described above, approximately $213 million of such debt would have been guaranteed by AMD (of which approximately $31 million would have been secured by assets of AMD);

•

in addition to the debt described above, we would have had other liabilities of approximately $1,869 million, approximately $1,100 million of which would have constituted other liabilities of our subsidiaries; and

•

in addition to the debt and other liabilities described above, AMD and/or its subsidiaries would have guaranteed approximately $178 million of obligations, which guarantees are not reflected on our consolidated balance sheet.

Furthermore, as of September 26, 2004, we had available up to $100 million for future secured borrowings under a revolving credit facility. We and our subsidiaries may incur additional debt (including secured and guaranteed debt) and other liabilities in the future.

Unrestricted Subsidiaries

We derived approximately 27 percent of our consolidated net sales for the year ended December 28, 2003 and 48 percent of our consolidated net sales for the nine months ended September 26, 2004 from our unrestricted subsidiaries, including Spansion LLC. The indenture governing the notes will provide that Spansion LLC and its subsidiaries will constitute unrestricted subsidiaries under, and as defined in, the indenture, even though certain debt of Spansion LLC and its subsidiaries (a) will be recourse debt and (b) could cause cross-defaults on our debt and the debt of our restricted subsidiaries. Spansion LLC and its subsidiaries, as unrestricted subsidiaries, will not be subject to the covenants or certain defaults applicable to us and our restricted subsidiaries. As of September 26, 2004 we had made loans to Spansion LLC and its subsidiaries in an aggregate amount of approximately $357 million and had guaranteed indebtedness of Spansion LLC and its subsidiaries in an aggregate amount of approximately $213 million.

Optional Redemption

Prior to November 1, 2008, we may redeem some or all of the notes at a price equal to 100 percent of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest and a “make-whole” premium. Thereafter, we may redeem all or part of the notes at any time at the redemption prices set forth in the section “Description of the Notes—Optional Redemption,” plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption.

On or prior to November 1, 2007, we may redeem up to 35 percent of the notes with the proceeds of certain sales of our equity securities at 107.75 percent of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption. See “Description of the Notes—Optional Redemption.”

Change of Control

Upon the occurrence of a change of control, you will have the right as a holder of notes to require us to repurchase all of your notes at a repurchase price equal to 101 percent of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of repurchase. We may not have enough funds or the terms of our other debt may prevent us from purchasing the notes. See “Description of the Notes—Repurchase at the Option of Holders Upon a Change of Control.”

Certain Covenants

The indenture governing the notes will contain certain covenants that will limit, among other things, our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to:

•

incur additional indebtedness;

•

pay dividends and make other restricted payments;

•

make certain investments, including investments in our unrestricted subsidiaries;

•

create or permit certain liens;

•

create or permit restrictions on the ability of the restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us;

•

use the proceeds from sales of assets;

•

enter into certain types of transactions with affiliates; and

•

consolidate or merge or sell our assets as an entirety or substantially as an entirety.

These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and limitations, which are described under the heading “Description of the Notes—Certain Covenants.”

Use of Proceeds

We will not receive any cash proceeds from the exchange offer.

Risk Factors

An investment in the notes involves substantial risks. You should consider carefully all of the information set forth in this prospectus and, in particular, should evaluate the specific factors set forth under “Risk Factors” before tendering your private notes in exchange for exchange notes.

Summary Historical Consolidated Financial Data

The following table sets forth summary historical consolidated financial information. The summary statement of operations and cash flows data for the years ended December 30, 2001, December 29, 2002 and December 28, 2003, and the summary balance sheet data as of December 29, 2002 and December 28, 2003, have been derived from, and should be read together with, our audited consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference in this prospectus. The summary balance sheet data as of December 30, 2001, have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not incorporated by reference in this prospectus. The summary balance sheet data and summary statement of operations and cash flows data as of and for the nine months ended September 26, 2004, and the summary balance sheet data and summary statement of operations and cash flows data as of and for the nine months ended September 28, 2003, have been derived from, and should be read together with, our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference in this prospectus. The summary balance sheet data as of September 28, 2003 have been derived from unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements not incorporated by reference in this prospectus. Other financial data, including data for the twelve months ended September 26, 2004, are derived from our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements. The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation. Our consolidated financial statements for periods subsequent to June 30, 2003 include the financial position and operating results of Spansion LLC, our majority-owned subsidiary, which we formed with Fujitsu Limited, effective June 30, 2003. Results of our operations for periods prior to June 30, 2003 do not include the operating results of Spansion LLC, therefore our operating results for the year ended December 28, 2003 and nine months ended September 26, 2004 are not fully comparable with our results for prior periods. We have provided summary historical consolidated financial data for the twelve-month period ended September 26, 2004 to enable investors to evaluate our consolidated operating results over the most recent cumulative 12-month period. Operating results for the nine months and twelve months ended September 26, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ended December 26, 2004. The following summary historical consolidated financial data should also be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”


	Fiscal Year Ended									Nine Months Ended						Twelve Months Ended Sept. 26, 2004
	Dec. 30, 2001			Dec. 29, 2002			Dec. 28, 2003			Sept. 28, 2003			Sept. 26, 2004			Twelve Months Ended Sept. 26, 2004
	(in thousands)
Statement of Operations Data:
Net sales	$	3,891,754		$	2,697,029		$	3,070,228		$	2,125,989		$	2,876,699		$	3,820,938
Net sales to related party		—			—			448,940			187,586			861,030			1,122,384

Total net sales		3,891,754			2,697,029			3,519,168			2,313,575			3,737,729			4,943,322

Expenses:
Cost of sales		2,589,747			2,105,661			2,327,063			1,548,556			2,289,935			3,068,442
Research and development		650,930			816,114			852,075			625,572			681,807			908,310
Marketing, general and administrative		620,030			670,065			587,307			424,500			561,389			724,196
Restructuring and other special charges, net		89,305			330,575			(13,893	)		(5,854	)		2,514			(5,525	)

Operating income (loss)		(58,258	)		(1,225,386	)		(233,384	)		(279,199	)		202,084			247,899
Interest income and other, net		25,695			32,132			21,116			12,203			11,280			20,193
Interest expense		(61,360	)		(71,349	)		(109,960	)		(79,017	)		(83,258	)		(114,201	)

Income (loss) before minority interest, income taxes and equity in net income of manufacturing joint venture⁽¹⁾		(93,923	)		(1,264,603	)		(322,228	)		(346,013	)		130,106			153,891
Minority interest in loss (income) of subsidiary		—			—			44,761			25,353			1,832			21,240

Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in net income of manufacturing joint venture		(93,923	)		(1,264,603	)		(277,467	)		(320,660	)		131,938			175,131
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(14,463	)		44,586			2,936			2,936			10,819			10,819

Income (loss) before equity in net income of manufacturing joint venture		(79,460	)		(1,309,189	)		(280,403	)		(323,596	)		121,119			164,312
Equity in net income of manufacturing joint venture		18,879			6,177			5,913			5,913			—			—

Net income (loss)	$	(60,581	)	$	(1,303,012	)	$	(274,490	)	$	(317,683	)		121,119			164,312


	Fiscal Year Ended								Nine Months Ended						Twelve Months Ended Sept. 26, 2004
	Dec. 30, 2001			Dec. 29, 2002			Dec. 28, 2003		Sept. 28, 2003			Sept. 26, 2004			Twelve Months Ended Sept. 26, 2004
	(in thousands)
Cash Flow Data:
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	167,645		$	(119,963	)	$	295,586	$	(93,006	)	$	724,333		$	1,112,925
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(553,521	)		(854,389	)		83,183		290,555			(1,011,791	)		(1,219,163	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		140,891			907,440			267,402		365,694			98,886			594

Other Financial Data:
EBITDA⁽²⁾	$	552,759		$	(466,298	)	$	814,367	$	457,673		$	1,098,685		$	1,455,379
Depreciation and amortization		622,867			756,169			995,663		708,352			895,104			1,182,415
Capital expenditures		678,865			705,147			570,316		407,535			969,758			1,132,539
Ratio of total debt to LTM net income																12.43	x
Ratio of total pro forma debt to LTM EBITDA⁽³⁾																1.39	x

Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
Cash⁽⁴⁾	$	869,997		$	1,006,655		$	1,313,367	$	1,075,939		$	1,185,177		$	1,185,177
Working capital		1,039,172			851,303			1,448,008		1,248,941			1,467,314			1,467,314

Total assets		5,647,242	⁽⁵⁾		5,710,318	⁽⁵⁾		7,049,772		6,664,365	⁽⁵⁾		7,282,439			7,282,439
Total long term debt and capital lease obligations		635,705			1,640,055			2,092,940		2,081,576			2,043,044			2,043,044
Stockholders’ equity		3,555,055			2,467,265			2,438,310		2,282,784			2,571,442			2,571,442

(1)	Manufacturing joint venture refers to Fujitsu AMD Semiconductor Limited (FASL), our previous manufacturing joint venture with Fujitsu Limited, which was contributed to Spansion LLC in connection with the formation of Spansion LLC, effective June 30, 2003.

(2)

EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) before (i) interest income, (ii) interest expense, (iii) provision for income taxes and (iv) depreciation and amortization. EBITDA does not include Fujitsu Limited’s 40 percent share of Spansion LLC’s net income or loss. Depreciation and amortization, interest income and interest expense as set forth below represent amounts that are also attributable to the results of operations of Spansion LLC and its subsidiaries. Other companies in our industry may calculate EBITDA differently than we do and EBITDA as presented in this prospectus may not be comparable with similarly titled measures of other companies. We have included this non-GAAP financial measure because we believe that it provides holders of the notes with useful information in assessing our operating performance and as an indicator of our ability to service or incur indebtedness, make capital expenditures and finance working capital requirements. EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities or as an alternative to net income as indicators of operating performance or any other measures of performance derived in accordance with GAAP. The reconciliation of net income (loss) under GAAP to EBITDA is as follows:


	Fiscal Year Ended									Nine Months Ended						Twelve Months Ended Sept. 26, 2004
	Dec. 30, 2001			Dec. 29, 2002			Dec. 28, 2003			Sept. 28, 2003			Sept. 26, 2004			Twelve Months Ended Sept. 26, 2004
	(in thousands)
Net income (loss)	$	(60,581	)	$	(1,303,012	)	$	(274,490	)	$	(317,683	)	$	121,119		$	164,312
Depreciation and amortization		622,867			756,169			995,663			708,352			895,104			1,182,415
Interest income		(56,424	)		(35,390	)		(19,702	)		(14,949	)		(11,615	)		(16,368	)
Interest expense		61,360			71,349			109,960			79,017			83,258			114,201
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(14,463	)		44,586			2,936			2,936			10,819			10,819

EBITDA	$	552,759		$	(466,298	)	$	814,367		$	457,673		$	1,098,685		$	1,455,379

(3)

Total pro forma debt is total debt taking into effect the issuance of the notes and the application of the net proceeds therefrom. We have included this non-GAAP financial measure because we believe that it provides noteholders with useful information in assessing our operating performance and as an indicator of our ability to service or incur indebtedness, make capital expenditures and finance working capital requirements. The reconciliation of the ratio of total debt to LTM net income (loss) under GAAP to the ratio of pro forma debt to LTM EBITDA is as follows:


	Twelve Months Ended Sept. 26, 2004
For a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA, see Footnote 2 above.
Reconciliation of total debt to pro forma total debt:
Total debt	$	2,043,044
Total pro forma debt		2,024,359
EBITDA		1,455,379
Ratio of total debt to net income		12.43	x
Ratio of pro forma total debt to net income		12.32	x
Ratio of pro forma debt to EBITDA		1.39	x

(4)	Cash includes cash, cash equivalents, compensating balance and short-term investments.

(5)

Total assets as of December 30, 2001, December 29, 2002 and September 28, 2003 do not reflect a reclassification of certain prior period amounts to conform to current period presentation. After taking effect of the reclassification, total assets for December 30, 2001, December 29, 2002 and September 28, 2003 were $5,636,445, $5,694,453 and $6,628,996. This reclassification will be reflected in our future earnings releases and periodic reports. We do not believe that these reclassifications are material to the overall presentation of our balance sheet data.

Summary Restricted Group Consolidated Financial Data

The following table sets forth summary restricted group unaudited consolidated financial data for the year ended December 28, 2003 and the nine months and twelve months ended September 26, 2004. Spansion LLC and its subsidiaries constitute “unrestricted subsidiaries” as defined under the indenture that governs the notes. The restricted group’s consolidated financial data does not include the results of operations of Spansion LLC and its subsidiaries. The restricted group consolidated financial data is presented in order to provide investors with financial information that substantially reflects the results of operations of that portion of our business that has been designated as “restricted subsidiaries.” Periods prior to June 30, 2003 include AMD sales attributable to our memory business, which was contributed to Spansion LLC on June 30, 2003. We have provided summary restricted group consolidated financial data for the twelve-month period ended September 26, 2004 to enable investors to evaluate the restricted group’s operating results over the most recent cumulative 12-month period. Operating results for the nine months and twelve months ended September 26, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ended December 26, 2004. The following information should also be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”


	Fiscal Year Ended Dec. 28, 2003			Nine Months Ended Sept. 26, 2004			Twelve Months Ended Sept. 26, 2004
	(in thousands)
Statement of Operations Data:
Net sales	$	2,583,957		$	1,962,478		$	2,628,021

Expenses:
Cost of sales		1,537,588			862,646			1,179,711
Research and development		708,274			477,982			629,645
Marketing, general and administrative		508,947			449,115			575,851
Restructuring and other special charges, net		(13,893	)		2,514			(5,525	)

Operating income (loss)		(156,959	)		170,221			248,339
Interest income and other, net		19,962			6,346			13,823
Interest expense		(88,539	)		(51,021	)		(70,484	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		(225,536	)		125,546			191,678

Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(1,479	)		15,192			15,649

Net income (loss)	$	(224,057	)	$	110,354			176,029

Other Financial Data:
EBITDA⁽¹⁾	$	584,111		$	645,855		$	886,599
Depreciation and amortization		739,875			479,068			638,589
Capital expenditures		402,607			541,234			624,873

Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
Cash⁽²⁾	$	983,823		$	901,609		$	901,609
Total long-term debt and capital lease obligations		1,567,338			1,602,664			1,602,664

(1)

EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) before (i) interest income, (ii) interest expense, (iii) provision for income taxes, and (iv) depreciation and amortization. Other companies in our industry may calculate EBITDA differently than we do and EBITDA as presented in this prospectus may not be comparable with similarly titled measures of other companies. We have included this non-GAAP financial measure because we believe that it provides holders of the notes with useful information in assessing the restricted group’s operating performance and as an indicator of the restricted group’s ability to meet our obligations under the notes. EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities or as an alternative to net income as

indicators of operating performance or any other measures of performance derived in accordance with GAAP. The reconciliation of net income (loss) under GAAP to EBITDA is as follows:


	Fiscal Year Ended Dec. 28, 2003			Nine Months Ended Sept. 26, 2004			Twelve Months Ended Sept. 26, 2004
	(in thousands)
Net income (loss)	$	(224,057	)	$	110,354		$	176,029
Depreciation and amortization		739,875			479,068			638,589
Interest income		(18,767	)		(9,780	)		(14,152	)
Interest expense		88,539			51,021			70,484
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(1,479	)		15,192			15,649

EBITDA	$	584,111		$	645,855		$	886,599

(2)	Cash includes cash, cash equivalents, compensating balance and short-term investments.

RISK FACTORS

An investment in our notes involves a high degree of risk. In deciding whether to invest in the notes, you should carefully consider the following factors, in addition to the other information and data contained in or incorporated by reference into this prospectus. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In such case, our ability to make payments on the notes could be impaired, the trading price of the notes could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Business

If we cannot generate sufficient operating cash flow and obtain external financing, we may be unable to make all of our planned capital expenditures or fulfill our obligations to Fab 36 or Spansion LLC.

Our ability to fund capital expenditures in accordance with our business plan depends on generating sufficient cash flow from operations and the availability of external financing. For example, in 2005 we plan to spend approximately $1.5 billion in capital expenditures.

Under the partnership agreement for AMD Fab 36 Limited Liability Company & Co. KG, or AMD Fab 36 KG, our German subsidiaries, AMD Fab 36 Holding GmbH and AMD Fab 36 Admin GmbH, are obligated to invest approximately $718 million into AMD Fab 36 KG (based on an exchange rate of 0.815 euro to one U.S. dollar as of September 26, 2004). In addition, under the revolving credit agreement among AMD, AMD Fab 36 Holding and AMD Fab 36 KG, we or AMD Fab 36 Holding are required to provide up to approximately $921 million to AMD Fab 36 KG (based on an exchange rate of 0.815 euro to one U.S. dollar as of September 26, 2004). Loans provided to AMD Fab 36 KG under this revolving credit agreement are unsecured and subordinated to the rights of the consortium of banks that will also be providing financing to AMD Fab 36 KG. In addition, we are also obligated through June 30, 2007 to provide Spansion LLC, our majority-owned subsidiary, with additional funding to finance operational cash flow needs. Generally, Spansion LLC must seek any required financing from external sources. However, if such third-party financing is not available, either on a non-recourse basis to us or with guarantees based on our pro rata ownership interest, we must provide funding to Spansion LLC equal to our pro rata ownership interest in Spansion LLC, which is currently 60%. An inability to meet our funding obligations for Spansion LLC could, among other things, result in additional equity in Spansion LLC being issued to Fujitsu or third parties, which would reduce our ownership in and control over Spansion LLC.

Our capital expenditures, together with ongoing operating expenses, will be a substantial drain on our cash flow and may decrease our cash balances. The timing and amount of our capital requirements cannot be precisely determined at this time and will depend on a number of factors, including demand for products, product mix, changes in semiconductor industry conditions and market competition. We regularly assess markets for external financing opportunities, including debt and equity. Additional debt or equity financing may not be available when needed or, if available, may not be available on satisfactory terms. Our inability to obtain needed debt and/or equity financing or to generate sufficient cash from operations may require us to abandon projects or curtail capital expenditures. If we curtail capital expenditures or abandon projects, we could be materially adversely affected. For example, if we abandon the Fab 36 project, we will have to write off related costs that we capitalized and we will be required to continue to make payments or otherwise be liable pursuant to then-existing contracts that we cannot terminate at will or without significant penalties.

If we lose Microsoft Corporation’s support for our products, or if there is a significant delay in Microsoft’s release of an operating system that works with our AMD64 technology, our ability to sell our microprocessors could be materially adversely affected.

Our ability to innovate beyond the x86 instruction set controlled by Intel depends partially on Microsoft designing and developing its operating systems to run on or support our microprocessor products. If Microsoft

does not continue to design and develop its operating systems so that they work with our x86 instruction sets, including the timely introduction of an operating system that works with the AMD64 technology that we introduced with our AMD Opteron and AMD Athlon 64 processors, independent software providers may forego designing their software applications to take advantage of our innovations and customers may not purchase personal computers, or PCs, with our microprocessors. If we fail to retain the support of Microsoft, our ability to market our microprocessors could be materially adversely affected.

In July 2004, Microsoft announced a delay in the release of its Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1, Windows Server 2003 for 64-bit Extended Systems and Windows XP 64-bit for 64-bit Extended Systems. The new Windows editions are designed to take advantage of 64-bit extensions to the standard x86 instruction set. Microsoft estimated that the release of this software will occur in the first half of 2005. Previously, Microsoft estimated the release date for this software would be in late 2004. This delay could adversely impact the timing of development of 64-bit applications by independent software providers and the adoption of 64-bit computing by end users. As a result, this delay could have a material adverse effect on our ability to sell our AMD Opteron and AMD Athlon 64 processors.

We must achieve further market acceptance of our 64-bit technology, AMD64, or we will be materially adversely affected.

We designed our AMD Opteron and AMD Athlon 64 processors to provide users with the ability to take advantage of 64-bit applications while preserving their ability to run existing 32-bit applications on servers and workstations and on desktop and mobile PCs. Market acceptance of these processors is subject to risks and uncertainties including:

•

the support of operating system and application program providers for our 64-bit instruction set, including timely development of 64-bit applications;

•

the willingness of users to purchase products with 64-bit capability prior to the availability of operating systems and software applications that take full advantage of our AMD64 technology;

•

our ability to produce these processors in a timely manner on advanced process technologies, including 90-nanometer silicon-on-insulator technology, in the volume and with the performance and feature set required by customers; and

•

the availability, performance and feature set of motherboards, memory and chipsets designed for these processors.

If we are unable to achieve further market acceptance of our AMD64 technology, we will be materially adversely affected.

We cannot be certain that our substantial investments in research and development of process technologies will lead to timely improvements in technology and equipment used to fabricate our products or that we will have sufficient resources to invest in the level of research and development that is required to remain competitive.

We make substantial investments in research and development for process technologies in an effort to design and manufacture leading-edge microprocessors. We cannot be certain that we will be able to develop, or obtain or successfully implement leading-edge process technologies needed to manufacture future generations of our products profitably or on a timely basis. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that we will have sufficient resources to maintain the level of investment in research and development that is required for us to remain competitive. For example, from the beginning of 2002 through September 26, 2004, we paid approximately $228 million to IBM in connection with agreements and services related to license grants and research and development activities.

In addition, we have a joint development agreement with IBM, pursuant to which we work together to develop new process technologies. The successful and timely development and implementation of silicon-on-insulator technology and the achievement of other milestones set forth in the joint development agreement with IBM are critical to our AMD Opteron and AMD Athlon 64 microprocessors and to our ability to commence operations at Fab 36 in accordance with our planned schedule. In September 2004, we amended our joint development agreement with IBM and extended its termination date from December 2005 to December 2008. The continuation of the process development projects past December 31, 2005 is conditioned upon the approval of IBM’s board of directors. If such approval is not received, either party has the right to terminate the agreement effective December 31, 2005 with respect to process development projects past December 31, 2005. If the agreement were to be terminated, we would either have to resume research and development activities for microprocessor technology internally or find an alternative partner. In either case, our research and development costs could increase, and we could experience delays or other setbacks in the development of new process technologies, any of which could materially adversely affect us.

The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and has experienced severe downturns that materially adversely affected, and may in the future materially adversely affect, our business.

The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and has experienced significant downturns, often in connection with maturing product cycles, manufacturing overcapacity and declines in general economic conditions. Our historical financial results have also been subject to substantial fluctuations. Our financial performance has been, and may in the future be, negatively affected by these downturns. We incurred substantial losses in recent downturns, due to:

•

the cyclical nature of supply/demand imbalances in the semiconductor industry;

•

a decline in demand for end-user products that incorporate our semiconductors;

•

excess inventory levels in the channels of distribution, including our customers;

•

excess production capacity; and

•

accelerated declines in average selling prices.

For example, in 2001 and 2002, we implemented restructuring plans due to weak customer demand associated with the downturn in the semiconductor industry. If these conditions in the semiconductor industry occur again in the future, we could be materially adversely affected.

Fluctuations in demand for PCs and mobile telephones may adversely affect sales of our products.

The Computation Products segment of our business is dependent upon the market for computers, including PCs. Industry-wide fluctuations in the computer marketplace have materially adversely affected us in the past and may materially adversely affect us in the future. Depending on the growth rate of computers sold, sales of our microprocessors may not grow and may even decrease. If end-user demand for computers is below our expectations, we could be materially adversely affected. In addition, potential market share increases by customers who exclusively purchase microprocessors from Intel Corporation, such as Dell, Inc., could further materially adversely affect us.

The Memory Products segment of our business is dependent to a large degree upon demand for mobile telephones. If demand for mobile telephones is below our expectations or if the functionality of successive generations of mobile telephones does not require increasing NOR Flash memory density, we could be materially adversely affected.

Intense competition in the microprocessor and Flash memory markets could materially adversely affect us.

The IC industry is intensely competitive. Our success depends to a significant extent on the development, qualification, implementation and acceptance of new product designs and improvements that provide value to our

customers. Our ability to develop and qualify such products and related technologies to meet evolving industry requirements and at prices acceptable to our customers are significant factors in determining our competitiveness in our target markets. If we are delayed in developing or qualifying new technologies, we could be materially adversely affected. For example, during the fourth quarter of 2004 we experienced a delay in qualifying a new Spansion Flash memory product in the wireless segment. This delay contributed to a decrease in our Flash memory product revenues.

With respect to our microprocessor products, our competitor is Intel. Microprocessor products compete on performance, quality, reliability, price, adherence to industry standards, software and hardware compatibility, marketing and distribution capability, brand recognition and availability. After a product is introduced, costs and average selling prices normally decrease over time as production efficiency improves, and successive generations of products are developed and introduced for sale. We may not be able to compete effectively if we fail to reduce our costs on existing products or fail to develop and introduce, on a cost-effective and timely basis, new products or enhanced versions of existing products with higher margins.

The Flash memory market is characterized by migration to higher density and lower cost devices and a competitive pricing environment. Our principal competitors in the Flash memory market are Intel, Samsung, Toshiba, STMicroelectronics N.V., Sharp Electronics Corporation, Silicon Storage Technology and Macronix International. In addition, ample capacity for manufacturing Flash memory products exists due to recent capital investment by some of our competitors, which may further contribute to a competitive pricing environment. In the past, the net increases of supply, meaning the difference of capacity additions less capacity reductions due to obsolescence, sometimes exceeded demand requirements leading to oversupply situations and downturns in the industry. Fluctuations in the rate at which industry capacity is growing relative to the growth rate in demand for Flash memory products, particularly NOR-based products, may in the future put pressure on our average selling prices and hurt our results of operations.

To compete successfully, we must transition to technologies that meet the increasing demand for higher Flash memory content in mobile phones and automotive applications, among other markets, at competitive prices. We expect competition in the Flash memory market to increase as existing manufacturers introduce new products, new manufacturers enter the market, industry-wide production capacity increases and competitors aggressively price their Flash memory products to increase market share.

In addition, we and certain of our competitors have licensed non-volatile memory technology called NROM technology from a third party. NROM technology allows memory devices to store two bits of data in a memory cell. NROM technology has similar characteristics to our MirrorBit technology which may allow these competitors to develop Flash memory technology that is competitive with MirrorBit technology.

Intel Corporation’s dominance of the microprocessor market, its position in the Flash memory market and its business practices may limit our ability to compete effectively.

Intel has dominated the market for microprocessors used in desktop and mobile PCs for many years. Intel is also a dominant competitor in the server segment of the microprocessor market and a significant competitor in the Flash memory market. Intel’s significant financial resources enable it to market its products aggressively, to target our customers and our channel partners with special incentives, and to discipline customers who do business with us. These aggressive activities can result in lower unit sales and average selling prices for our products, particularly microprocessors and Flash memory products, and adversely affect our margins and profitability. For example, Intel exerts substantial influence over PC manufacturers and their channels of distribution through the “Intel Inside” brand program and other marketing programs. As long as Intel remains in this dominant position, we may be materially adversely affected by Intel’s:

•

pricing and allocation strategies and actions, including aggressive pricing for Flash memory products and microprocessors to increase market share;

•

product mix and introduction schedules;

•

product bundling, marketing and merchandising strategies;

•

exclusivity payments to its current and potential customers;

•

control over industry standards, PC manufacturers and other PC industry participants, including motherboard, memory, chipset and basic input/output system, or BIOS, suppliers; and

•

user brand loyalty.

Because of its dominant position in the microprocessor market, Intel has been able to control x86 microprocessor and PC system standards and dictate the type of products the microprocessor market requires of Intel’s competitors. Intel also dominates the PC system platform, which includes core logic chipsets, graphics chips, motherboards and other components necessary to assemble a PC system. As a result, PC original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, are highly dependent on Intel, less innovative on their own and, to a large extent, are distributors of Intel technology. Additionally, Intel is able to drive de facto standards for x86 microprocessors that could cause us and other third-party companies to have delayed access to such standards. In marketing our microprocessors to OEMs, we depend on third-party companies other than Intel for the design and manufacture of core-logic chipsets, graphics chips, motherboards, BIOS software and other components. In recent years, many of these third-party designers and manufacturers have lost significant market share to Intel or exited the business. In addition, these companies produce chipsets, motherboards, BIOS software and other components to support each new generation of Intel’s microprocessors, and Intel has significant leverage over their business opportunities.

We do not currently plan to develop microprocessors that are bus interface protocol compatible with Intel microprocessors because our patent-cross license agreement with Intel does not extend to Intel’s proprietary bus interface protocol. Thus, our microprocessors are not designed to function with motherboards and chipsets designed to work with Intel microprocessors. Our ability to compete with Intel in the market for microprocessors will depend on our continued success in developing and maintaining relationships with infrastructure providers in order to ensure that these third-party designers and producers of motherboards, chipsets and other system components support our microprocessor offerings, particularly AMD64-based microprocessors. A failure of the designers and producers of motherboards, chipsets and other system components to support our microprocessor offerings, particularly our AMD64-based microprocessors, could have a material adverse effect on us.

We expect Intel to maintain its dominant position in the microprocessor market, to continue to be a significant competitor in the Flash memory market and to continue to invest heavily in research and development, new manufacturing facilities and other technology companies. Intel has substantially greater financial resources than we do and accordingly spends substantially greater amounts on research and development and production capacity than we do. We expect competition from Intel to increase to the extent Intel reduces prices on its microprocessor and/or Flash memory products and introduces new competitive products. For example, during June 2004 Intel announced the availability of a 64-bit processor for servers and workstations that runs existing 32-bit software applications. These processors compete with our AMD Opteron microprocessors. In addition, Intel announced that it will offer 64-bit processors for the desktop market and other market segments that will be able to run existing 32-bit software applications in a time frame based on both timing and availability of the infrastructure required to support them, and customer demand. These products would compete with our AMD Athlon 64 microprocessors. Moreover, Intel currently manufactures certain of its microprocessor products on 300-millimeter wafers using 90-nanometer process technology. Use of 90-nanometer technology can result in products that are higher performing, use less power and cost less to manufacture. Use of 300-millimeter wafers can decrease manufacturing costs and increase capacity by yielding more chips per wafer than 200-millimeter wafers. We are currently transitioning to 90-nanometer process technology for microprocessor manufacturing and we expect to transition to 300-millimeter wafers in 2006. To the extent Intel manufactures its microprocessor products on larger wafers and smaller process technologies earlier than we do, we may be more vulnerable to Intel’s aggressive pricing strategies for microprocessor products. Intel’s dominant position in the microprocessor market, its existing relationships with top-tier OEMs and its aggressive pricing strategies could result in lower unit sales and average selling prices for our products, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

The loss of a significant customer for our microprocessor products or the loss of a significant customer for our Spansion Flash memory products in the high-end mobile telephone market, may have a material adverse effect on us.

Collectively, our top ten OEM microprocessor customers accounted for approximately 17 percent of our total net revenues in 2003. Our Flash memory product sales growth is dependent on demand for high-end mobile telephones. To date, our sales in that market have been concentrated with a limited group of customers. If we were to lose a significant customer, or if one of our top customers downsizes or otherwise contracts its operations, demand for our products could decrease and we would be materially adversely affected.

A lack of market acceptance of MirrorBit technology could have a material adverse effect on us.

We believe that market acceptance of MirrorBit technology is a critical factor impacting our ability to increase Flash memory product revenues and market share. MirrorBit technology is a memory cell architecture that enables Flash memory products to store two bits of data in a single memory cell thereby doubling the density or storage capacity of each memory cell. A lack of continued market acceptance of MirrorBit technology, adoption of such technology at a slower rate than we anticipate, or any substantial difficulty in transitioning Flash memory products, including those based on MirrorBit technology, to any future process technology could reduce our ability to be competitive in the market.

In addition, we intend to address end markets traditionally served by Flash memory products based on NAND architecture with our new ORNAND architecture. We are currently developing these products and if they, or any future products based on our MirrorBit technology and ORNAND architecture, fail to achieve acceptance in markets traditionally served by NAND architecture, or at all, we could be materially adversely affected.

Spansion Flash memory products are based on NOR architecture, and a significant market shift to NAND architecture could materially adversely affect us.

Flash memory products are generally based on either Boolean logic-based NOR (Not Or) architecture or NAND (Not And) architecture. NAND has historically been the preferred architecture for data storage because of attributes such as high densities and fast write and erase speeds. NOR has been the preferred architecture for code execution because of its fast read performance and superior reliability. To date, our Flash memory products have been based on NOR architecture, and we do not currently manufacture products based on NAND architecture. During 2003, industry sales of products based on NAND architecture grew at higher rates than sales of NOR-based products. This resulted in NAND vendors gaining a greater share of the overall Flash market. As mobile telephones and other consumer-driven applications become more advanced they will require higher density Flash memory to meet increased data storage requirements from music downloads, photos and videos. Because storage requirements will increase to accommodate data-intensive applications, OEMs may increasingly choose NAND-based products, accepting the drawbacks in reliability in exchange for a lower cost alternative than NOR. Any significant shift in the marketplace to products based on NAND architecture or other architectures may reduce the total market available to us and therefore reduce our market share.

We are required to reach agreement with Fujitsu regarding certain actions of our majority-owned subsidiary, Spansion LLC, and our interests may not be aligned.

We own 60 percent of the equity interest in Spansion LLC while Fujitsu owns the remaining 40 percent. Although we are entitled to appoint a majority of the board of managers which generally manages the affairs of Spansion LLC, certain actions by Spansion LLC require Fujitsu’s consent for as long as Fujitsu maintains specific levels of equity ownership in Spansion LLC. In addition, based upon designated thresholds of Fujitsu’s percentage interest in Spansion LLC, certain actions require the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the managers appointed by Fujitsu. These actions include:

•

major investments, acquisitions and dispositions of assets;

•

a merger or consolidation resulting in the transfer of more than 50% of the equity interests;

•

settlement of major legal proceedings and other actions;

•

approval of certain material contracts between us and Spansion LLC;

•

changes to the equity capital structure of the Spansion LLC; and

•

winding-up Spansion LLC or one of its material subsidiaries.

There can be no guarantee that our interests and those of Fujitsu will be aligned with respect to such decisions and we may be unable to take steps that we believe are desirable. In addition, a reduction in our percentage interest may result in our inability to appoint a majority of Spansion LLC’s board of managers, which could result in the loss of effective control of Spansion LLC, although the results of operations of Spansion LLC may continue to impact significantly our results of operations and we still may be required to make loans to, and guarantee indebtedness of, Spansion LLC.

Our operating results are subject to quarterly and seasonal sales patterns.

A substantial portion of our quarterly sales have historically been made in the last month of the quarter. This uneven sales pattern makes prediction of net sales for each financial period difficult and increases the risk of unanticipated variations in quarterly results and financial condition. In addition, our operating results tend to vary seasonally. For example, demand in the retail sector of the PC market is often stronger during the fourth quarter as a result of the winter holiday season. European sales are often weaker during the summer months. Many of the factors that create and affect seasonal trends are beyond our control.

Worldwide economic and political conditions may adversely affect demand for our products.

The last economic slowdown in the United States and worldwide adversely affected demand for our products. Although economic conditions have continued to improve since the second half of 2003, another decline in the worldwide semiconductor market or a future decline in economic conditions or consumer confidence in any significant geographic area would likely decrease the overall demand for our products, which could have a material adverse effect on us. For example, China’s economy has been growing at a fast pace over the past several years, and Chinese authorities have recently introduced various measures to slow down the pace of economic growth. However, if Chinese authorities are not able to stage an orderly slowdown, China’s economy could be materially adversely affected. A decline in economic conditions in China could lead to declining worldwide economic conditions. If economic conditions decline, whether in China or worldwide, we could be materially adversely affected.

The occurrence and threat of terrorist attacks and the consequences of sustained military action in the Middle East have in the past, and may in the future, adversely affect demand for our products. In addition, terrorist attacks may negatively affect our operations directly or indirectly and such attacks or related armed conflicts may directly impact our physical facilities or those of our suppliers or customers. Furthermore, these attacks may make travel and the transportation of our products more difficult and more expensive, ultimately affecting our sales.

Also as a result of terrorism, the United States has been and may continue to be involved in armed conflicts that could have a further impact on our sales, our supply chain and our ability to deliver products to our customers. Political and economic instability in some regions of the world may also result and could negatively impact our business. The consequences of armed conflicts are unpredictable, and we may not be able to foresee events that could have a material adverse effect on us.

More generally, any of these events could cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease or result in increased volatility to the United States economy and worldwide financial markets. Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect on us and also may result in volatility of the market price for our securities.

Unfavorable currency exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect us.

As a result of our foreign operations, we have sales, costs, assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the European Union euro and the Japanese yen. For example:

•

a significant portion of our manufacturing costs for our microprocessor products is denominated in euro while sales of those products are denominated primarily in U.S. dollars;

•

some fixed asset purchases are denominated in euro and yen;

•

sales of our Flash memory products in Japan are denominated in yen; and

•

a significant amount of the costs of our Fab 36 project is denominated in euro.

As a consequence, movements in exchange rates could cause our U.S. dollar-denominated expenses to increase as a percentage of net sales, affecting our profitability and cash flows. For example, the U.S. dollar- denominated cost of construction of Fab 36 has increased from our initial projections as a result of the recent depreciation of the U.S. dollar against the euro. Whenever we believe appropriate, we hedge a portion of our foreign currency exchange exposure to protect against fluctuations in currency exchange rates. As of September 26, 2004 we had an aggregate of $503 million (notional amount) of short-term foreign currency forward contracts and purchased call option contracts denominated in euro and yen. However, generally, we hedge only a portion of our foreign currency exchange exposure. Moreover, we determine our total foreign currency exchange exposure using projections of long-term expenditures for items such as equipment and materials used in manufacturing. We cannot assure you that our hedging activities will eliminate foreign exchange rate exposure. Failure to do so could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.

In addition, even where revenues and expenses are matched, we must translate euro and yen denominated results of operations, assets and liabilities for our foreign subsidiaries to U.S. dollars in our consolidated financial statements. Consequently, increases and decreases in the value of the U.S. dollar versus the euro or yen will affect our reported results of operations and the value of our assets and liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet, even if our results of operations or the value of those assets and liabilities has not changed in their original currency. These transactions could significantly affect the comparability of our results between financial periods and/or result in significant changes to the carrying value of our assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity.

Manufacturing capacity constraints and manufacturing capacity utilization rates may adversely affect us.

There may be situations in which our manufacturing facilities are inadequate to meet the demand for certain of our products. Our inability to obtain sufficient manufacturing capacity to meet demand, either in our own facilities or through foundry or similar arrangements with third parties, could have a material adverse effect on us. If we do not complete the transition to 90-nanometer manufacturing process technology at Fab 30 on a timely basis, we may not be able to meet the demand for certain of our microprocessor products. In addition, if we do not transition to manufacturing certain Flash memory products using 90-nanometer and more advanced manufacturing process technology on a timely basis, or otherwise increase capacity for our Flash memory business, we may not be able to meet demand for these products from our customers. If we cannot meet demand for our products we could be materially adversely affected.

At times we may underutilize our manufacturing facilities as a result of reduced demand for certain of our products. During such times, many of our costs remain fixed and cannot be reduced in proportion to the reduced revenues for such a period. We are substantially increasing our manufacturing capacity by building Fab 36, transitioning to smaller manufacturing process technologies and making significant capital investments in our existing manufacturing facilities. In addition, we have announced plans to construct a clean room for and facilitize a new 300-millimeter Flash memory fabrication facility, which we call SP1. If the increase in demand for our products is not consistent with our expectations, we may underutilize manufacturing facilities. This has in the past had, and in the future may have, a material adverse effect on us.

Unless we maintain manufacturing efficiency, our future profitability could be materially adversely affected.

Manufacturing our products involves highly complex processes that require advanced equipment. Our manufacturing efficiency is an important factor in our profitability, and we cannot be sure that we will be able to maintain or increase our manufacturing efficiency to the same extent as our competitors. We continuously modify manufacturing processes in an effort to improve yields and product performance and decrease costs. We may fail to achieve acceptable yields or experience product delivery delays as a result of, among other things, capacity constraints, construction delays, delays in the development of new process technologies, changes in our process technologies, upgrades or expansion of existing facilities, or impurities or other difficulties in the manufacturing process.

We are currently completing the transition to 90-nanometer process technology for our microprocessor products. In addition, we plan to transition the manufacture of certain Flash memory products to 90-nanometer process technology in the second half of 2005. During periods when we are implementing new process technologies, manufacturing facilities may not be fully productive. A substantial delay in the technology transitions to smaller process technologies could have a material adverse effect on us, particularly if our competitors transition to more cost effective technologies earlier than we do. Our results of operations could also be adversely affected by the increase in fixed costs and operating expenses related to increases in production capacity if revenues do not increase proportionately.

If our microprocessors are not compatible with some or all industry-standard software and hardware, we could be materially adversely affected.

Our microprocessors may not be fully compatible with some or all industry-standard software and hardware. Further, we may be unsuccessful in correcting any such compatibility problems in a timely manner. If our customers are unable to achieve compatibility with software or hardware after our products are shipped in volume, we could be materially adversely affected. In addition, the mere announcement of an incompatibility problem relating to our products could have a material adverse effect on us.

Costs related to defective products could have a material adverse effect on us.

One or more of our products may be found to be defective after the product has been shipped to customers in volume. The cost of a recall, software fix, product replacements and/or product returns may be substantial and could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, modifications needed to fix the defect may impede performance of the product.

If essential equipment or materials are not available to manufacture our products, we could be materially adversely affected.

Our manufacturing operations depend upon obtaining deliveries of equipment and adequate supplies of materials on a timely basis. We purchase equipment and materials from a number of suppliers. From time to time, suppliers may extend lead times, limit supply to us or increase prices due to capacity constraints or other factors. Because some equipment and material that we purchase is complex, it is sometimes difficult for us to substitute one supplier for another or one piece of equipment for another. In addition, certain raw materials we use in the manufacture of our products are available from a limited number of suppliers. For example, we are largely dependent on one supplier for our 200-millimeter and 300-millimeter silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafers. Although there are alternative sources available for us to procure these wafers, we have not qualified these sources and we do not believe that they currently have sufficient capacity to meet our requirements for SOI wafers. We are also dependent on other key chemicals from a limited number of suppliers and also rely on a limited number of foreign companies to supply the majority of certain types of IC packages we purchase. Similarly, we purchase commercial non-Flash memory die, such as SRAM and pSRAM, from third-party suppliers and incorporate these die into Spansion multi-chip package products. Some of these suppliers are also

our competitors. Interruption of supply or increased demand in the industry could cause shortages and price increases in various essential materials. If we are unable to procure certain of these materials, we may have to reduce our manufacturing operations. Such a reduction could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our inability to continue to attract and retain qualified personnel may hinder our product development programs.

Our future success depends upon the continued service of numerous qualified engineering, manufacturing, marketing, sales and executive personnel. If we are not able to continue to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel necessary for our business, the progress of our product development programs could be hindered, and we could be materially adversely affected.

We outsource to third parties certain supply-chain logistics functions, including physical distribution of our products, and co-source some information technology services.

We rely on a third-party provider to deliver our products to our customers and to distribute materials for our fabrication facilities. In addition, we rely on a third-party provider in India to provide certain information technology services to us, including helpdesk support, desktop application services, business and software support applications, server and storage administration, data center operations, database administration, and voice, video and remote access. Our relationships with these providers are governed by fixed term contracts. We cannot guarantee that these providers will fulfill their respective responsibilities in a timely manner in accordance with the contract terms, in which case our internal operations, the distribution of our products to our customers and the distribution of materials for our fabrication facilities could be materially adversely affected. Also, we cannot guarantee that our contracts with these third-party providers will be renewed, in which case we would have to transition these functions in-house or secure new providers, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

In addition, we decided to outsource or co-source these functions to third parties primarily to lower our operating expenses and to create a more variable cost structure. However, if the costs related to administration, communication and coordination of these third-party providers are greater than we expect, then we will not realize our anticipated cost savings.

Uncertainties involving the ordering and shipment of, and payment for, our products could materially adversely affect us.

Sales of our products are typically made pursuant to individual purchase orders. We generally do not have long-term supply arrangements with our microprocessor customers. From time to time, we enter into long-term supply arrangements with our Flash memory customers. Generally, our customers may cancel orders 30 days prior to shipment without incurring a significant penalty. We base our inventory levels on customers’ estimates of demand for their products, which are difficult to predict. This difficulty may be compounded when we sell to OEMs indirectly through distributors, as our forecasts for demand are then based on estimates provided by multiple parties. In addition, our customers may change their inventory practices on short notice for any reason. The cancellation or deferral of product orders, the return of previously sold products or overproduction due to failure of anticipated orders to materialize could result in excess or obsolete inventory, which could result in write-downs of inventory. Because market conditions are uncertain, these and other factors could materially adversely affect us.

Our reliance on third-party distributors subjects us to certain risks.

We market and sell our products directly and through third-party distributors pursuant to agreements that can generally be terminated for convenience by either party upon prior notice to the other party. In addition, these agreements are non-exclusive and permit our distributors to offer our competitors’ products. In 2003, two distributors, Avnet, Inc. and Fujitsu (a distributor of Spansion LLC), each accounted for approximately 13

percent of our consolidated net sales. Accordingly, we are dependent on our distributors to supplement our direct marketing and sales efforts. If any significant distributor or a substantial number of our distributors terminated their relationship with us or decided to market our competitors’ products over our products, our ability to bring our products to market would be impacted and we could be materially adversely affected.

Additionally, distributors typically maintain an inventory of our products. In most instances, our agreements with distributors protect their inventory of our products against price reductions, as well as provide return rights for our products. Under certain agreements, distributors are allowed to return any product that we have removed from our price book or that is not more than twelve months older than the manufacturing code date. In addition, some agreements with our distributors contain standard stock rotation provisions permitting limited levels of product returns. We defer the gross margins on our sales to distributors, resulting from both our deferral of revenue and related product costs, until the applicable products are re-sold by the distributors. However, in the event of an unexpected significant decline in the price of our products, the price protection rights we offer to our distributors could materially adversely affect us because our revenue would decline.

Our operations in foreign countries are subject to political and economic risks, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

We have international sales operations and as part of our business strategy, we are continuing to seek expansion of product sales in high growth markets. Our international sales as a percentage of our total consolidated net sales were approximately 80 percent and 77 percent in 2003 and the nine months ended September 26, 2004, respectively. Nearly all product assembly and final testing of our products are performed at manufacturing facilities in China, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand. We manufacture our microprocessors in Germany and certain Spansion Flash memory products are manufactured in Japan. We also depend on foreign foundry suppliers for the production of our sets and our embedded microprocessors for personal connectivity devices and depend on an international joint venture for the manufacture of optical photomasks that we intend to use in the manufacture of our microprocessors.

The political and economic risks associated with our operations in foreign countries include, without limitation:

•

expropriation;

•

changes in a specific country’s or region’s political or economic conditions;

•

trade protection measures and import or export licensing requirements;

•

difficulty in protecting our intellectual property;

•

changes in foreign currency exchange rates;

•

restrictions on transfers of funds and other assets of our subsidiaries between jurisdictions;

•

changes in freight and interest rates;

•

disruption in air transportation between the United States and our overseas facilities; and

•

loss or modification of exemptions for taxes and tariffs.

Any of the above risks, should they occur, could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our inability to effectively control the sales of our products on the gray market could have a material adverse effect on us.

We market and sell our products directly to OEMs and through authorized third-party distributors. From time to time, our products are diverted from our authorized distribution channels and are sold on the “gray market.” Gray market products entering the market result in shadow inventory that is not visible to us, thus

making it difficult to forecast demand accurately. Also, when gray market products enter the market, we and our distribution channel compete with heavily discounted products, which adversely affects demand for our products. In addition, our inability to control gray marketing activities could result in customer satisfaction issues, because any time products are purchased outside our authorized distribution channel, there is a risk that our customers are buying counterfeit or substandard products, including products that may have been altered, mishandled or damaged, or used products represented as new. Our inability to control sales of our products on the gray market could have a material adverse effect on us.

If we cannot adequately protect our technology or other intellectual property in the United States and abroad, through patents, copyrights, trade secrets, trademarks and other measures, we may lose a competitive advantage and incur significant expenses.

We rely on a combination of protections provided by contracts, copyrights, patents, trademarks and other common law rights, such as trade secrets, to protect our intellectual property. However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to adequately protect our technology or other intellectual property from third party infringement or from misappropriation in the United States and abroad. Any patent licensed by us or issued to us could be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or rights granted thereunder may not provide a competitive advantage to us. Furthermore, patent applications that we file may not result in issuance of a patent or, if a patent is issued, the patent may not be issued in a form that is advantageous to us. Despite our efforts to protect our rights, others may independently develop similar products, duplicate our products or design around our patents and other rights. In addition, it is difficult to monitor compliance with, and enforce, our intellectual property on a worldwide basis in a cost-effective manner.

We may become a party to intellectual property claims or litigation that could cause us to incur substantial costs or pay substantial damages or prohibit us from selling our products.

From time to time, we have been notified that we may be infringing intellectual property rights of others. If any such claims are asserted against us, we may seek to obtain a license under the third party’s intellectual property rights. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain all necessary licenses on satisfactory terms, if at all. In the event we cannot obtain a license, we may be prevented from using some technology which could result in our having to stop the sale of some of our products, increase the costs of selling some of our products, or damage our reputation. We could decide, in the alternative, to resort to litigation to challenge such claims. Such challenges could be extremely expensive and time-consuming and could have a material adverse effect on us. We cannot assure you that litigation related to the intellectual property rights of us and others will always be avoided or successfully concluded.

Our failure to comply with any applicable environmental regulations could result in a range of consequences, including fines, suspension of production, alteration of manufacturing processes, sales limitations, and criminal and civil liabilities.

Our operations are subject to various U.S. and foreign environmental statutes and regulations, including those relating to materials used in our products, manufacturing processes and packaging, discharge of pollutants into the air, water and soil, treatment, transport, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes, and remediation of soil and groundwater contamination. From time to time, our facilities are subject to investigation by governmental regulators. We have in the past been named and may in the future be named as a responsible party or a potentially responsible party on Superfund clean-up orders and other environmental investigations sponsored by the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA. We cannot be certain that we have identified all environmental matters giving rise to potential liability. Existing or future regulations could require us to procure expensive pollution abatement or remediation equipment, to modify product designs or to incur other expenses associated with compliance with environmental regulations. Any past misuse of hazardous materials, new releases or newly discovered contaminations at any of our currently or formerly owned or operated properties could result in increased expenditures or liabilities which could materially adversely affect us.

Future litigation proceedings may materially adversely affect us.

From time to time we are a defendant or plaintiff in various legal actions. Litigation can involve complex factual and legal questions and its outcome is uncertain. Any claim that is successfully asserted against us may cause us to pay substantial damages. In addition, future litigation may result in injunctions against future product sales. Even if we were to prevail, any litigation could be costly and time-consuming and would divert the attention of our management and key personnel from our business operations, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our worldwide operations could be subject to natural disasters and other business disruptions, which could harm our future revenue and financial condition and increase our costs and expenses.

Our worldwide operations could be subject to natural disasters and other business disruptions, which could harm our future revenue and financial condition and increase our costs and expenses. For example, our corporate headquarters are located near major earthquake fault lines in California and some wafer fabrication facilities for Spansion Flash memory products are located near major earthquake fault lines in Japan. In the event of a major earthquake, or other natural or manmade disaster we could experience business interruptions, destruction of facilities and/or loss of life, all of which could materially adversely affect us.

Risks Related to the Notes

If you do not exchange your notes pursuant to this exchange, you may never be able to sell your notes.

It may be difficult for you to sell notes that are not exchanged in the exchange offer. Those notes may not be offered or sold unless they are registered and there are exemptions from the registration requirements under the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws.

If you do not tender your private notes or if we do not accept some of your private notes, those notes will continue to be subject to the transfer and exchange restrictions in:

•

the indenture;

•

the legend on the private notes; and

•

the offering circular relating to the private notes.

The restrictions on transfer of your private notes arise because we issued the private notes pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws. In general, you may only offer or sell the private notes if they are registered under the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws, or offered and sold pursuant to an exemption from such requirements. We do not intend to register the private notes under the Securities Act. To the extent private notes are tendered and accepted in the exchange offer, the trading market, if any, for the private notes would be adversely affected.

We have a substantial amount of indebtedness which could adversely affect our financial position and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under the notes.

We currently have, and following this offering will continue to have, a substantial amount of indebtedness. As of September 26, 2004, after giving effect to the issuance of the notes and the application of the net proceeds therefrom, we would have had consolidated debt of approximately $2,024 million. In addition, we guaranteed approximately $178 million of obligations which are not reflected on our balance sheet.

Our substantial indebtedness may:

•

make it difficult for us to satisfy our financial obligations, including making scheduled principal and interest payments on the notes and our other indebtedness;

•

limit our ability to borrow additional funds for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and general corporate and other purposes;

•

limit our ability to use our cash flow or obtain additional financing for future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other general corporate purposes;

•

require us to use a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to make debt service payments;

•

limit our flexibility to plan for, or react to, changes in our business and industry;

•

place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our less leveraged competitors; and

•

increase our vulnerability to the impact of adverse economic and industry conditions.

The notes will be unsecured and effectively subordinated to our existing and future secured indebtedness.

The notes will be unsecured obligations, ranking effectively junior in right of payment to all of our existing and future secured debt, including obligations under our revolving credit facility. As of September 26, 2004, after giving effect to the issuance of the notes and the application of the net proceeds therefrom, we (excluding our subsidiaries) would have had no secured indebtedness but up to $100 million available for future secured borrowings under our revolving credit facility. In addition, the indenture governing the notes will permit the incurrence of additional debt, some of which may be secured. In the event that we are declared bankrupt, become insolvent or are liquidated or reorganized, any secured indebtedness will be entitled to be paid in full to the extent of the assets securing such debt before any payment is made with respect to the notes. As a result, holders of the notes may receive less from our assets, ratably, than holders of our secured indebtedness.

The notes will be structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other liabilities, including trade payables, of our subsidiaries.

We conduct a substantial portion of our operations, including our international operations and our Flash memory business, through our subsidiaries. In the event of our bankruptcy or the bankruptcy of any of our subsidiaries, the holders of their liabilities, indebtedness and trades payables will generally be entitled to payment of their claim from the assets of the affected subsidiaries before those assets were made available for distribution to us. Even if we were a creditor of such a subsidiary, our claims would remain subordinate to any indebtedness of such subsidiary which is senior in right of payment to the indebtedness held by us. As a result, the claims of holders of the notes will rank effectively junior to the claims of all of the creditors of our subsidiaries, including trade creditors and holders of debt guaranteed by our subsidiaries. If any indebtedness of our subsidiaries were to be accelerated, we cannot assure you that the assets of the subsidiaries remaining after payment of such indebtedness and other liabilities would be sufficient to repay our indebtedness in full, including the notes. As of September 26, 2004, after giving effect to the issuance of the notes and the application of the net proceeds therefrom, no debt directly borrowed by AMD would have been guaranteed or secured by any of our subsidiaries. Our subsidiaries would have had approximately $521 million of their own indebtedness (excluding amounts payable to affiliated entities) and approximately $1,100 million of other liabilities outstanding, including trade payables and deferred income tax liabilities. In addition, the indenture governing the notes will permit, subject to certain limitations, certain of these subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness and will not contain any limitation on the amount of other liabilities, such as trade payables, that may be incurred by these subsidiaries.

Spansion LLC will not be subject to the covenants contained in the indenture governing the notes and we will be permitted to make certain loans and advances to Spansion LLC in addition to those already outstanding.

Under the terms of the indenture that governs the notes, Spansion LLC and its subsidiaries will constitute “unrestricted subsidiaries.” The activities of Spansion LLC and its subsidiaries will therefore not be subject to the restrictive covenants or certain defaults in the indenture, and its results of operations will not be considered (except to the extent dividends are paid to us or to a restricted subsidiary) when determining our consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio under the covenant restricting our indebtedness or our consolidated net income under the covenant governing restricted payments. In addition, the indenture contains certain exceptions to the covenants generally applicable to unrestricted subsidiaries, including the fact that indebtedness of Spansion LLC and its subsidiaries can be recourse to us and our restricted subsidiaries and could cross-default to our debt and

the debt of our restricted subsidiaries. As of September 26, 2004, we had made loans to Spansion LLC and its subsidiaries in an aggregate amount of approximately $357 million and had guaranteed indebtedness of Spansion LLC and its subsidiaries in an aggregate amount of approximately $213 million. Following the date of this offering, we will be permitted to make further loans and advances in accordance with the covenants restricting indebtedness and governing restricted payments contained in the indenture. This additional amount of permitted investments, together with the fact that Spansion LLC is not subject to any limitations on indebtedness under the indenture, may make it more difficult for us to fulfill our obligations under the notes.

We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantially more debt, including secured debt, in the future.

Subject to the restrictions in the agreements governing our existing indebtedness, we and our subsidiaries may incur significant additional debt, including secured debt, in the future. In particular, after giving effect to the issuance of the notes and the application of the net proceeds therefrom, as of September 26, 2004, we and our subsidiaries would have had the following additional borrowings available:

•

We currently have available up to $100 million under our revolving credit facility. Amounts borrowed under this facility are secured by all of our accounts receivable, inventory, general intangibles (excluding intellectual property) and the related proceeds, excluding Spansion LLC’s accounts receivable, inventory and general intangibles.

•

Spansion Japan, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Spansion LLC, had up to 15 billion yen (approximately $136 million as of September 26, 2004) available under a revolving credit facility.

•

AMD Fab 36 KG will have the ability, subject to achieving certain technological milestones, to borrow up to $859 million (based on an exchange rate of 0.815 euro to one U.S. dollar as of September 26, 2004) from a consortium of banks under the Fab 36 Loan Agreements during 2006 and 2007.

Although the terms of these facilities contain, and the indenture governing the notes will contain, restrictions on the incurrence of additional debt, these restrictions are subject to a number of important exceptions, and debt incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. The additional debt that we and our subsidiaries expect to obtain in the future could intensify the risk that we may not be able to fulfill our obligations under the notes.

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service our debt obligations, including our obligations under the notes.

Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our debt, including the notes, or our guarantees of other parties’ debts will depend on our financial and operating performance, which may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter, and is subject to prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. We cannot assure you that we will continue to generate sufficient cash flow or that we will be able to borrow funds under our credit facilities in amounts sufficient to enable us to service our debt, or to meet our working capital and capital expenditure requirements. If we are not able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations or to borrow sufficient funds to service our debt, due to borrowing base restrictions or otherwise, we may be required to sell assets or equity, reduce capital expenditures, refinance all or a portion of our existing debt or obtain additional financing. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance our debt, sell assets or equity, or borrow more funds on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

Changes in the financial and credit markets or in our credit ratings could adversely affect the market prices of the notes.

The future market prices of the notes will depend on a number of factors, including:

•

the prevailing interest rates being paid by companies similar to us;

•

our ratings with major credit rating agencies; and

•

the overall condition of the financial and credit markets.

The condition of the financial and credit markets and prevailing interest rates have fluctuated in the past and are likely to fluctuate in the future. Fluctuations in these factors could have an adverse effect on the market prices of the notes. In addition, credit rating agencies continually revise their ratings for companies that they follow, including us. We cannot assure you that any credit rating agencies that rate the notes will maintain their ratings on the notes. A negative change in our rating could have an adverse effect on the market price of the notes.

Our debt instruments impose restrictions on us that may adversely affect our ability to operate our business.

The indenture governing the notes will contain various covenants that limit our ability to:

•

incur additional indebtedness;

•

pay dividends and make other restricted payments;

•

make certain investments, including investments in our unrestricted subsidiaries;

•

create or permit certain liens;

•

create or permit restrictions on the ability of certain restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us;

•

use the proceeds from sales of assets;

•

enter into certain types of transactions with affiliates; and

•

consolidate or merge or sell our assets as an entirety or substantially as an entirety.

In addition:

•

The guarantees associated with the Fab 36 Loan Agreements contain restrictive covenants, including a prohibition on the ability of AMD Fab 36 KG and its affiliated limited partners to pay us dividends and other payments, and also require us to maintain specified financial ratios when group consolidated cash is below specified amounts.

•

Our revolving credit facility contains restrictive covenants, including a prohibition on our ability to pay dividends, and also requires us to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy other financial condition tests when our net domestic cash is below specified amounts.

•

The July 2003 Spansion Term Loan, as amended, contains restrictive covenants, including a prohibition on Spansion LLC’s ability to pay dividends and also requires Spansion LLC to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy other financial condition tests when its net domestic cash or its net worldwide cash is below specified amounts.

Our ability to satisfy the covenants, financial ratios and tests of our debt instruments can be affected by events beyond our control. We cannot assure you that we will meet those requirements. A breach of any of these covenants, financial ratios or tests could result in a default under the applicable agreement. In addition, those agreements contain cross-default provisions whereby a default under one agreement would likely result in cross-default under agreements covering other borrowings. For example, the occurrence of a default with respect to any indebtedness that results in acceleration of the maturity date or any failure to repay debt when due in an amount in excess of $50 million would cause a cross default under the indenture governing these notes. Similarly, a default with respect to any indebtedness in excess of $25 million would cause a cross-default under the indentures governing our 4.75% Convertible Senior Debentures due 2022 and 4.50% Notes. The occurrence of a default under any of these borrowing arrangements would permit the applicable lenders or note holders to declare all amounts outstanding under those borrowing arrangements to be immediately due and payable and would permit the lenders to terminate all commitments to extend further credit. If we were unable to repay those amounts, the lenders could proceed against any collateral granted to them to secure that indebtedness. We have granted a security interest in substantially all of our inventory and accounts receivable under our revolving credit facility, and in certain property, plant and equipment under the July 2003 Spansion Term Loan Agreement. If the

lenders under any of the credit facilities or the note holders or the trustee under the indenture governing our 4.75% Debentures and our 4.50% Notes accelerate the repayment of borrowings, we cannot assure you that we will have sufficient assets to repay those borrowings and our other indebtedness.

In the event of a change of control, we may not be able to repurchase the notes as required by the indenture, which would result in a default under our indenture.

Upon a change of control under the indenture, we will be required to offer to repurchase all of the notes then outstanding at 101 percent of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, up to but excluding the repurchase date. Our secured revolving credit facility and the Fab 36 Loan Agreements provide that certain change of control events will be a default under the respective agreement that will permit the lenders to accelerate the maturity of all borrowings thereunder and terminate commitments to lend thereunder. Moreover, the indentures governing our 4.75% Debentures and 4.50% Notes require us to offer to repurchase these securities upon certain change of control events. As of September 26, 2004, after giving effect to the exchange of an aggregate of $201.0 million of our 4.50% Notes for 29,391,261 shares of our common stock, which occurred after September 26, 2004, the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the 4.75% Debentures and the 4.50% Notes was $701.5 million. Any of our future debt agreements may contain similar provisions. We cannot assure you that we will have the financial resources to repurchase your notes, particularly if that change of control event triggers a similar repurchase requirement for, or results in the acceleration of the 4.75% Debentures, the 4.50% Notes or other indebtedness.

In addition, our secured revolving credit facility would prohibit us from repurchasing any of the notes if we were in default or if our net domestic cash (as defined therein) falls below $125 million. Our Fab 36 Loan Agreements would also prohibit us from repurchasing the notes if our group consolidated cash (as defined therein) falls below $500 million and if as a result of such repurchase we would not be able to satisfy the financial covenants therein. As of September 26, 2004, net domestic cash totaled $333 million and group consolidated cash was greater than $500 million. However, if we were to be subject to these covenants and unable to obtain a consent to the repurchase, we would remain prohibited from repurchasing the notes.

You cannot be sure that an active trading market will develop for the notes.

The exchange notes are a new issue of securities for which there is no active trading market. The initial purchasers of the private notes have advised us that they presently intend to make a market in the exchange notes as permitted by applicable law. The initial purchasers are not obligated, however, to make a market in the exchange notes and any such market-making may be discontinued at any time at the sole discretion of the initial purchasers. If an active market is not developed or maintained, the market price and the liquidity of the notes may be adversely affected. In addition, the liquidity of the trading market in the notes and the market prices quoted for the notes may be adversely affected by changes in the overall market for high-yield securities and by changes in our financial performance or prospects, or in the prospects of the companies in our industry. The market price of the notes may also be significantly affected by wide fluctuations in response to a variety of factors, including those described in this “Risk Factors” section.

THE EXCHANGE OFFER

Purpose of the Exchange Offer

We issued $600,000,000 of the private notes on October 29, 2004 to Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, the initial purchasers, pursuant to a purchase agreement. The initial purchasers subsequently sold the private notes to “qualified institutional buyers,” as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act, pursuant to Rule 144A, and outside the United States under Regulation S of the Securities Act. As a condition to the sale of the private notes, we entered into a registration rights agreement with the initial purchasers on October 29, 2004. Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, we agreed that we would:

1. file an exchange offer registration statement with the SEC on or prior to January 28, 2005;

2. use our commercially reasonable efforts to have the exchange offer registration statement declared effective by the SEC on or prior to May 2, 2005;

3. keep the exchange offer open for a period of not less than the minimum period required under applicable law, but in no event for less than 30 days; and

4. use our commercially reasonable efforts to consummate the exchange offer on or before June 14, 2005.

Upon the effectiveness of the exchange offer registration statement, we will offer the exchange notes in exchange for the private notes. A copy of the registration rights agreement is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

Resale of the Exchange Notes

Based upon an interpretation by the staff of the SEC contained in no-action letters issued to third parties, we believe that you may exchange private notes for exchange notes in the ordinary course of business. For further information on the SEC’s position, see Exxon Capital Holdings Corporation, available May 13, 1988, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, available June 5, 1991 and Sherman & Sterling, available July 2, 1993, and other interpretive letters to similar effect. You will be allowed to resell exchange notes to the public without further registration under the Securities Act and without delivering to purchasers of the exchange notes a prospectus that satisfies the requirements of Section 10 of the Securities Act so long as you do not participate, do not intend to participate, and have no arrangement with any person to participate, in a distribution of the exchange notes. However, the foregoing does not apply to you if you are: a broker-dealer who purchased the exchange notes directly from us to resell pursuant to Rule 144A or any other available exemption under the Securities Act; or an “affiliate” of ours within the meaning of Rule 405 under the Securities Act.

In addition, if you are a broker-dealer, or you acquire exchange notes in the exchange offer for the purpose of distributing or participating in the distribution of the exchange notes, you cannot rely on the position of the staff of the SEC contained in the no-action letters mentioned above and must comply with the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any resale transaction, unless an exemption from registration is otherwise available.

Each broker-dealer that receives exchange notes for its own account in exchange for private notes, which the broker-dealer acquired as a result of market-making activities or other trading activities, must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of the exchange notes. The letter of transmittal states that by so acknowledging and by delivering a prospectus, a broker-dealer will not be deemed to admit that it is an “underwriter” within the meaning of the Securities Act. A broker-dealer may use this prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, in connection with resales of exchange notes received in exchange for private notes which the broker-dealer acquired as a result of market-making or other trading activities. We have agreed that, starting on the expiration date and ending on the close of business 180 days after the expiration date, we will make this prospectus available to any broker-dealer for use in connection with any such resale. See “Plan of Distribution.”

Terms of the Exchange Offer

Upon the terms and subject to the conditions described in this prospectus and in the letter of transmittal, we will accept any and all private notes validly tendered and not withdrawn before the expiration date. We will issue $1,000 principal amount of exchange notes in exchange for each $1,000 principal amount of outstanding private notes surrendered pursuant to the exchange offer. You may tender private notes only in integral multiples of $1,000.

The form and terms of the exchange notes are the same as the form and terms of the private notes except that:

•

we will register the exchange notes under the Securities Act and, therefore, the exchange notes will not bear legends restricting their transfer; and

•

holders of the exchange notes will not be entitled to any of the rights of holders of private notes under the registration rights agreement, which rights will terminate upon the completion of the exchange offer.

The exchange notes will evidence the same debt as the private notes and will be issued under the same indenture, so the exchange notes and the private notes will be treated as a single class of debt securities under the indenture.

As of the date of this prospectus, $600,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of the private notes are outstanding and registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company. Only registered holders of the private notes, or their legal representative or attorney-in-fact, as reflected on the records of the trustee under the indenture, may participate in the exchange offer. We will not set a fixed record date for determining registered holders of the private notes entitled to participate in the exchange offer.

You do not have any appraisal or dissenters’ rights under the indenture in connection with the exchange offer. We intend to conduct the exchange offer in accordance with the provisions of the registration rights agreement and the applicable requirements of the Securities Act, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations of the SEC.

We will be deemed to have accepted validly tendered private notes when, as and if we had given oral or written notice of acceptance to the exchange agent. The exchange agent will act as your agent for the purposes of receiving the exchange notes from us.

If you tender private notes in the exchange offer you will not be required to pay brokerage commissions or fees or, subject to the instructions in the letter of transmittal, transfer taxes with respect to the exchange of private notes pursuant to the exchange offer. We will pay all charges and expenses, other than the applicable taxes described below, in connection with the exchange offer.

Expiration Date; Extensions; Amendments

The expiration date will mean 5:00 p.m., New York City time on , 2005, unless we, in our sole discretion, extend the exchange offer, in which case the expiration date will mean the latest date and time to which we extend the exchange offer.

To extend the exchange offer, we will:

•

notify the exchange agent of any extension orally or in writing; and

•

communicate to each registered holder an announcement that will include disclosure of the approximate number of private notes deposited to date,

each before 9:00 a.m., New York City time, on the next business day after the previously scheduled expiration date.

We reserve the right, in our reasonable discretion:

•

to delay accepting any private notes;

•

to extend the exchange offer; or

•

if any conditions listed below under “—Conditions” are not satisfied, to terminate the exchange offer by giving oral or written notice of the delay, extension or termination to the exchange agent.

We will follow any delay in acceptance, extension or termination as promptly as practicable by oral or written notice to the registered holders. If we amend the exchange offer in a manner we determine constitutes a material change, we will promptly disclose the amendment in a prospectus supplement that we will distribute to the registered holders. We will also extend the exchange offer for a period of five to ten business days, depending upon the significance of the amendment and the manner of disclosure, if the exchange offer would otherwise expire during the five to ten business day period.

Interest on the Exchange Notes

The exchange notes will bear interest at the same rate and on the same terms as the private notes. Consequently, the exchange notes will bear interest at a rate equal to 7.75% per annum (calculated using a 360-day year). Interest will be payable semi-annually on each May 1 and November 1, commencing May 1, 2005.

You will receive interest on May 1, 2005 from the date of the initial issuance of the exchange notes, plus an amount equal to the accrued interest on the private notes from October 29, 2004 to the date of exchange. We will deem the right to receive any interest accrued on the private notes waived by you if we accept your private notes for exchange.

Procedures for Tendering

You may tender private notes in the exchange offer only if you are a registered holder of private notes. To tender in the exchanger offer, you must:

•

complete, sign and date the letter of transmittal or a facsimile of the letter of transmittal;

•

have the signatures guaranteed if required by the letter of transmittal; and

•

mail or otherwise deliver the letter of transmittal or the facsimile to the exchange agent at the address listed below under “—Exchange Agent” for receipt before the expiration date.

In addition, either:

•

the exchange agent must receive certificates for the private notes along with the letter of transmittal into its account at the depositary pursuant to the procedure for book-entry transfer described below before the expiration date;

•

the exchange agent must receive a timely confirmation of a book-entry transfer of the private notes, if the procedure is available, into its account at the depositary pursuant to the procedure for book-entry transfer described below before the expiration date; or

•

you must comply with the guaranteed delivery procedures described below.

Your tender, if not withdrawn before the expiration date, will constitute an agreement between you and us in accordance with the terms and subject to the conditions described in this prospectus and in the letter of transmittal.

The method of delivery of private notes and the letter of transmittal and all other required documents to the exchange agent is at your election and risk. We recommend that instead of delivery by mail, you use an overnight

or hand delivery service, properly insured. In all cases, you should allow sufficient time to assure delivery to the exchange agent before the expiration date. You should not send letters of transmittal or private notes to us. You may request your respective brokers, dealers, commercial banks, trust companies or nominees to effect the transactions described above for you.

If you are a beneficial owner of private notes whose private notes are registered in the name of a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee and you wish to tender your notes, you should contact the registered holder promptly and instruct the registered holder to tender on your behalf. If you wish to tender on your own behalf, before completing and executing the letter of transmittal and delivering the private notes you must either:

•

make appropriate arrangements to register ownership of the private notes in your name; or

•

obtain a properly completed bond power from the registered holder.

The transfer of registered ownership may take considerable time. Unless the private notes are tendered:

1. by a registered holder who has not completed the box entitled “Special Issuance Instructions” or the box entitled “Special Delivery Instructions” on the letter of transmittal; or

2. for the account of: a member firm of a registered national securities exchange or of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; a commercial bank or trust company having an office or correspondent in the United States; or an “eligible guarantor institution” within the meaning of Rule 17Ad-15 under the Exchange Act that is a member of one of the recognized signature guarantee programs identified in the letter of transmittal,

an eligible guarantor institution must guarantee the signatures on a letter of transmittal or a notice of withdrawal described below under “—Withdrawal of Tenders.”

If the letter of transmittal is signed by a person other than the registered holder, the private notes must be endorsed or accompanied by a properly completed bond power, signed by the registered holder as the registered holder’s name appears on the private notes.

If the letter of transmittal or any private notes or bond powers are signed by trustees, executors, administrators, guardians, attorneys-in-fact, officers of corporations or others acting in a fiduciary or representative capacity, they should so indicate when signing, and unless waived by us, they submit evidence satisfactory to us of their authority to so act with the letter of transmittal.

The exchange agent and the depositary have confirmed that any financial institution that is a participant in the depositary’s system may utilize the depositary’s Automated Tender Offer Program to tender notes.

We will determine in our sole discretion all questions as to the validity, form, eligibility, including time of receipt, acceptance and withdrawal of tendered private notes, which determination will be final and binding. We reserve the absolute right to reject any and all private notes not properly tendered or any private notes our acceptance of which would, in the opinion of our counsel, be unlawful. We also reserve the right to waive any defects, irregularities or conditions of tender as to particular private notes. Our interpretation of the terms and conditions of the exchange offer, including the instructions in the letter of transmittal, will be final and binding on all parties. Unless waived, you must cure any defects or irregularities in connection with tenders of private notes within the time we determine. Although we intend to notify you of defects or irregularities with respect to tenders of private notes, neither we, the exchange agent nor any other person will incur any liability for failure to give you that notification. Unless waived, we will not deem tenders of private notes to have been made until you cure the defects or irregularities.

While we have no present plan to acquire any private notes that are not tendered in the exchange offer or to file a registration statement to permit resales of any private notes that are not tendered in the exchange offer, we

reserve the right in our sole discretion to purchase or make offers for any private notes that remain outstanding after the expiration date. We also reserve the right to terminate the exchange offer, as described below under “—Conditions,” and, to the extent permitted by applicable law, purchase private notes in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. The terms of any of those purchases or offers could differ from the terms of the exchange offer.

If you wish to tender private notes in exchange for exchange notes in the exchange offer, we will require you to represent that:

•

you are not an affiliate of ours;

•

you will acquire any exchange notes in the ordinary course of your business; and

•

at the time of completion of the exchange offer, you have no arrangement with any person to participate in the distribution of the exchange notes.

In addition, in connection with the resale of exchange notes, any participating broker-dealer who acquired the private notes for is own account as a result of market-making or other trading activities must deliver a prospectus meeting the requirements of the Securities Act. The SEC has taken the position that participating broker-dealers may fulfill their prospectus delivery requirements with respect to the exchange notes, other than a resale of an unsold allotment from the original sale of the notes, with this prospectus.

Return of the Notes

If we do not accept any tendered private notes for any reason described in the terms and conditions of the exchange offer or if you withdraw or submit private notes for a greater principal amount than you desire to exchange, we will return the unaccepted, withdrawn or non-exchanged notes without expense to you as promptly as practicable. In the case of private notes tendered by book-entry transfer into the exchange agent’s account at the depositary pursuant to the book-entry transfer procedures described below, we will credit the private notes to an account maintained with the depositary as promptly as practicable.

Book-Entry Transfer

The exchange agent will make a request to establish an account with respect to the private notes at the depositary for purposes of the exchange offer within two business days after the date of this prospectus, and any financial institution that is a participant in the depositary’s systems may make book-entry delivery of private notes by causing the depositary to transfer the private notes into the exchange agent’s account at the depositary in accordance with the depositary’s procedures for transfer. However, although delivery of private notes may be effected through book-entry transfer at the depositary, you must transmit and the exchange agent must receive, the letter of transmittal or a facsimile of the letter of transmittal, with any required signature guarantees and any other required documents, at the address below under “—Exchange Agent” on or before the expiration date or pursuant to the guaranteed delivery procedures described below.

Guaranteed Delivery Procedures

If you wish to tender your private notes and (1) the notes are not immediately available or (2) you cannot deliver the private notes, the letter of transmittal or any other required documents to the exchange agent before the expiration date, you may effect a tender if:

1. the tender is made through an eligible guarantor institution;

2. before the expiration date, the exchange agent receives from the eligible guarantor institution a properly completed and duly executed notice of guaranteed delivery, substantially in the form provided by us, that: states your name and address, the certificate number(s) of the private notes and the principal amount of private notes tendered, states that the tender is being made by that notice of guaranteed delivery,

and guarantees that, within three New York Stock Exchange trading days after the expiration date, the eligible guarantor institution will deposit with the exchange agent the letter of transmittal, together with the certificate(s) representing the private notes in proper form for transfer or a confirmation of a book-entry transfer, as the case may be, and any other documents required by the letter of transmittal; and

3. within five New York Stock Exchange trading days after the expiration date, the exchange agent receives a properly executed letter of transmittal, as well as the certificate(s) representing all tendered private notes in proper form for transfer and all other documents required by the letter of transmittal.

Upon request, the exchange agent will send to you a notice of guaranteed delivery if you wish to tender your notes according to the guaranteed delivery procedures described above.

Withdrawal of Tenders

Except as otherwise provided in this prospectus, you may withdraw tenders of private notes at any time before 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date.

To withdraw a tender of private notes in the exchange offer, the exchange agent must receive a written or facsimile transmission notice of withdrawal at its address listed in this prospectus before the expiration date. Any notice of withdrawal must:

•

specify the name of the person who deposited the private notes to be withdrawn;

•

identify the private notes to be withdrawn, including the certificate number(s) and principal amount of the private notes; and

•

be signed in the same manner as the original signature on the letter of transmittal by which the private notes were tendered, including any required signature guarantees.

We will determine in our sole discretion all questions as to the validity, form and eligibility of the notices, and our determination will be final and binding on all parties. We will not deem any properly withdrawn private notes to have been validly tendered for purposes of the exchange offer, and we will not issue exchange notes with respect to those private notes, unless you validly retender the withdrawn private notes. You may retender properly withdrawn private notes by following one of the procedures described above under “—Procedures for Tendering” at any time before the expiration date.

Conditions

Notwithstanding any other term of the exchange offer, we will not be required to accept for exchange, or exchange the exchange notes for, any private notes, and may terminate the exchange offer as provided in this prospectus before the acceptance of the private notes, if, in our reasonable judgment, the exchange offer violates applicable law, rules or regulations or an applicable interpretation of the staff of the SEC.

If we determine in our reasonable discretion that any of these conditions are not satisfied, we may

•

refuse to accept any private notes and return all tendered private notes to you;

•

extend the exchange offer and retain all private notes tendered before the exchange offer expires, subject, however, to your rights to withdraw the private notes; or

•

waive the unsatisfied conditions with respect to the exchange offer and accept all properly tendered private notes that have not been withdrawn.

If the waiver constitutes a material change to the exchange offer, we will promptly disclose the waiver by means of a prospectus supplement that we will distribute to the registered holders of the private notes, and we

will extend the exchange offer for a period of five to ten business days, depending upon the significance of the waiver and the manner of disclosure to the registered holders, if the exchange offer would otherwise expire during the five to ten business day period.

Termination of Rights

All of your rights under the registration rights agreement will terminate upon consummation of the exchange offer except with respect to our continuing obligations:

•

to indemnify you and parties related to you against liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act; and

•

to provide, upon your request, the information required by Rule 144A(d)(4) under the Securities Act to permit resales of the notes pursuant to Rule 144A.

Shelf Registration

If:

1. we are not permitted to consummate the exchange offer because the exchange offer is not permitted by applicable law or SEC policy;

2. the exchange offer has not been consummated by June 14, 2005; or

3. the exchange offer is not available to any holder of transfer restricted securities,

we will file with the SEC a shelf registration statement to cover resales of the private notes by the holders thereof who satisfy certain conditions relating to the provision of information in connection with the shelf registration statement.

For purposes of the preceding, “transfer restricted securities” means each private note until:

1. the date on which such note has been exchanged by a person other than a broker-dealer for an exchange note in the exchange offer;

2. following the exchange by a broker-dealer in the exchange offer of a private note for an exchange note, the date on which such exchange note is sold to a purchaser who receives from such broker-dealer on or prior to the date of such sale a copy of the prospectus contained in the exchange offer registration statement;

3. the date on which such private note has been effectively registered under the Securities Act and disposed of in accordance with the shelf registration statement; or

4. the date on which such private note is distributed to the public pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act.

Liquidated Damages

If:

1. we fail to file any registration statement required by the registration rights agreement on or before the date specified for such filing; or

2. any of such registration statements is not declared effective by the SEC on or prior to the date specified for such effectiveness; or

3. we fail to consummate the exchange offer by June 14, 2005; or

4. the shelf registration statement or the exchange offer registration statement is declared effective but (i) ceases to be effective at any time at which it is required to be effective under the registration rights

agreement, or (ii) ceases to be usable in connection with resales or exchanges of transfer restricted securities with and during the periods specified in the registration rights agreement;

(each such event referred to in clauses (1) through (4) above, a “registration default”), then we will pay to each holder of the outstanding notes, as liquidated damages, for the period from the occurrence of the registration default until such time as no registration default is in effect an amount per annum equal to 0.25% during the first 90-day period following the occurrence of such registration default which rate shall increase by an additional 0.25% during each subsequent 90-day period, up to a maximum of 1.00% in respect of the aggregate principal amount of transfer restricted securities held by such holder until the applicable registration statement is filed, the exchange offer registration statement is declared effective and the exchange offer is consummated or the shelf registration statement is declared effective or again becomes effective, as the case may be. If, after the cure of all registration defaults then in effect, there is a subsequent registration default, the rate of additional interest for such subsequent registration default shall initially be 0.25% regardless of the rate in effect with respect to any prior registration default at the time of cure of such registration default.

Exchange Agent

We have appointed Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as exchange agent for the exchange offer. You should direct questions and requests for assistance, requests for additional copies of this prospectus or the letter of transmittal and requests for a notice of guaranteed delivery to the exchange agent addressed as follows:


By Registered or Certified Mail:		By Hand Delivery:

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.		Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
707 Wilshire Boulevard, 17^th Floor		707 Wilshire Boulevard, 17^th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017		Los Angeles, California 90017
Attention: Corporate Trust Administration		Attention: Corporate Trust Administration

By Overnight Delivery:		By Facsimile:

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.		(213) 614-3355
707 Wilshire Boulevard, 17^th Floor		Attention: Corporate Trust Administration
Los Angeles, California 90017		Confirm by Telephone:
Attention: Corporate Trust Administration		(213) 614-3349

Delivery to an address other than the one stated above or transmission via a facsimile number other than the one stated above will not constitute a valid delivery.

Fees and Expenses

We will bear the expenses of soliciting tenders. We are making the principal solicitation by mail; however, our officers and regular employees may make additional solicitations by facsimile, telephone or in person.

We have not retained any dealer manager in connection with the exchange offer and will not make any payments to brokers, dealers or others soliciting acceptances of the exchange offer. We will, however, pay the exchange agent reasonable and customary fees for its services and will reimburse it for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.

We will pay the cash expenses incurred in connection with the exchange offer which we estimate to be approximately $250,000. These expenses include registration fees, fees and expenses of the exchange agent and the trustee, accounting and legal fees and printing costs, among others.

We will pay all transfer taxes, if any, applicable to the exchange of notes pursuant to the exchange offer. If, however, a transfer tax is imposed for any reason other than the exchange of the private notes pursuant to the

exchange offer, then you must pay the amount of the transfer taxes. If you do not submit satisfactory evidence of payment of the taxes or exemption from payment with the letter of transmittal, we will bill the amount of the transfer taxes directly to you.

Consequences of Failures to Exchange

Participation in the exchange offer is voluntary. We urge you to consult your financial and tax advisors in making your decisions on what action to take. Private notes that are not exchanged for exchange notes pursuant to the exchange offer will remain restricted securities. Accordingly, those private notes may be resold only:

•

to a person whom the seller reasonably believes is a qualified institutional buyer in a transaction meeting the requirements of Rule 144A;

•

in a transaction meeting the requirements of Rule 144 under the Securities Act;

•

outside the United States to a foreign person in a transaction meeting the requirements of Rule 903 or 904 of Regulation S under the Securities Act;

•

in accordance with another exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act and based upon an opinion of counsel if we so request;

•

to us; or

•

pursuant to an effective registration statement.

In each case, the private notes may be resold only in accordance with any applicable securities laws of any state of the United States or any other applicable jurisdiction.

USE OF PROCEEDS

The exchange offer satisfies an obligation under the registration rights agreement. We will not receive any cash proceeds from the exchange offer.

The net proceeds from the sale of the private notes, after deducting discounts, commissions and estimated offering expenses were approximately $587.0 million. We used the net proceeds, along with existing cash, to prepay the full amount owed by our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, AMD Saxony, under the Dresden Term Loan, which, including accrued and unpaid interest through the prepayment date, was $647.2 million based on a U.S. dollar to euro exchange rate of $1.28 to €1.00 as of November 2, 2004, the date of the prepayment. In connection with the prepayment, we paid a prepayment premium of approximately $8.5 million based on a U.S. dollar to euro exchange rate of $1.33 to €1.00, the average of the exchange rates in effect on the three installment dates during which the prepayment premium was paid.

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth our consolidated cash and long-term debt, including the current portion, and capitalization as of September 26, 2004 on an actual basis and as adjusted to give effect to the issuance and the sale of the notes and the application of the net proceeds therefrom as described under “Use of Proceeds.” This table should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto and the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”


	As of September 26, 2004
	Actual		As adjusted
	(in thousands)
Cash⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	$	1,185,177	1,145,676

Long-term debt and capital lease obligations including current portion:
Secured revolving credit facility⁽³⁾		—	—
Dresden Term Loan		618,685	—
7.75% Senior Notes due 2012		—	600,000
4.75% Convertible Senior Debentures due 2022⁽⁴⁾		500,000	500,000
4.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2007⁽⁵⁾		402,500	402,500
Spansion Japan Revolving Credit Facility⁽⁶⁾		—	—
July 2003 Spansion Term Loan		51,474	51,474
Spansion Japan Term Loan		130,169	130,169
Capital lease obligations		206,413	206,413
Other⁽⁷⁾		60,089	60,089

Total long-term debt and capital lease obligations		1,969,330	1,950,645

Total stockholders’ equity⁽⁸⁾		2,571,442	2,563,626

Total capitalization	$	4,540,772	4,514,271

(1)	Cash includes cash, cash equivalents, compensating balance and short-term investments.

(2)

As adjusted, reflects a $7.8 million prepayment premium under the Dresden Term Loan based on a U.S. dollar to euro exchange rate of $1.23 to €1.00 as of September 26, 2004. Along with the net proceeds from the sale of the private notes, approximately $39.5 million of existing cash would have been required to prepay the loan, including the prepayment premium.

(3)	As of September 26, 2004, we had up to $100 million available under the secured revolving credit facility.

(4)	The 4.75% Debentures are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $23.38 per share, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances.

(5)

The 4.50% Notes are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $7.37 per share, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. This amount does not reflect the exchange by us of an aggregate of $201.0 million of our 4.50% Notes for 29,391,261 shares of our common stock after September 26, 2004.

(6)	As of September 26, 2004, Spansion Japan had approximately $136 million available under this facility.

(7)	Includes $40 million under a cash note to Fujitsu related to funding of Spansion LLC, approximately $6.7 million under the AMD Penang term loan and approximately $13.4 million under the Spansion China loan.

(8)	Adjusted to reflect the $7.8 million prepayment premium described under note (2) above.

SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial data. The selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 29, 2002 and December 28, 2003 and the selected statement of operations and cash flows data for the years ended December 30, 2001, December 29, 2002 and December 28, 2003 have been derived from, and should be read together with, our audited consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference in this prospectus. The selected balance sheet data as of December 26, 1999, December 31, 2000 and December 30, 2001, and the selected consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 26, 1999 and December 31, 2000 have been derived from, and should be read together with, our audited consolidated financial statements not incorporated by reference in this prospectus. The selected statement of operations and cash flows data as of and for the nine months ended September 28, 2003 and September 26, 2004 have been derived from, and should be read together with, our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference in this prospectus. Other financial data are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements, our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and our accounting records. The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation. Our consolidated financial statements for periods subsequent to September 28, 2003 include Spansion LLC, our majority-owned subsidiary which was formed by us and Fujitsu Limited, effective June 30, 2003. Our results of operations for periods prior to June 30, 2003 do not include Spansion LLC, therefore our results of operations for the year ended December 28, 2003 are not fully comparable with our results for prior periods. In addition, results of operations for the nine months ended September 26, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ended December 27, 2004. The following selected consolidated financial data should also be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”


	Fiscal Year Ended															Nine Months Ended
	Dec. 26, 1999			Dec. 31, 2000			Dec. 30, 2001			Dec. 29, 2002			Dec. 28, 2003			Sept. 28, 2003			Sept. 26, 2004
	(in thousands)
Statement of Operations Data:
Net sales	$	2,857,604		$	4,644,187		$	3,891,754		$	2,697,029		$	3,070,228		$	2,125,989		$	2,876,699
Net sales to related party		—			—			—			—			448,940			187,586			861,030

Total net sales		2,857,604			4,644,187			3,891,754			2,697,029			3,519,168			2,313,575			3,737,729
Expenses:
Cost of sales		1,964,434			2,514,637			2,589,747			2,105,661			2,327,063			1,548,556			2,289,935
Research and development		635,786			641,799			650,930			816,114			852,075			625,572			681,807
Marketing, general and administrative		540,070			599,015			620,030			670,065			587,307			424,500			561,389
Restructuring and other special charges, net		38,230			—			89,305			330,575			(13,893	)		(5,854	)		2,514

Operating income (loss)		(320,916	)		888,736			(58,258	)		(1,225,386	)		(233,384	)		(279,199	)		202,084
Interest income and other, net		463,794			423,200			25,695			32,132			21,116			12,203			11,280
Interest expense		(69,253	)		(60,037	)		(61,360	)		(71,349	)		(109,960	)		(79,017	)		(83,258	)

Income (loss) before minority interest, income taxes and equity in net income of manufacturing joint venture⁽¹⁾		73,625			1,251,899			(93,923	)		(1,264,603	)		(322,228	)		(346,013	)		130,106
Minority interest in loss (income) of subsidiary		—			—			—			—			44,761			25,353			1,832

Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in net income of manufacturing joint venture		73,625			1,251,899			(93,923	)		(1,264,603	)		(277,467	)		(320,660	)		131,938
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		167,350			256,868			(14,463	)		44,586			2,936			2,936			10,819

Income (loss) before equity in net income of manufacturing joint venture		(93,725	)		995,031			(79,460	)		(1,309,189	)		(280,403	)		(323,596	)		121,119
Equity in net income of manufacturing joint venture		4,789			11,039			18,879			6,177			5,913			5,913			—

Net income (loss) before extraordinary item		(88,936	)		1,006,070			(60,581	)		(1,303,012	)		(274,490	)		(317,683	)		(121,119	)
Extraordinary item—debt retirement, net of $13,497 tax benefit		—			(23,044	)		—			—			—			—			—

Net income (loss)	$	(88,936	)	$	983,026		$	(60,581	)	$	(1,303,012	)	$	(274,490	)	$	(317,683	)		121,119


	Fiscal Year Ended														Nine Months Ended
	Dec. 26, 1999			Dec. 31, 2000			Dec. 30, 2001			Dec. 29, 2002			Dec. 28, 2003		Sept. 28, 2003			Sept. 26, 2004
	(in thousands)
Cash Flow Data:
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		259,920			1,205,552			167,645			(119,963	)		295,586		(93,006	)		724,333
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(142,374	)		(815,802	)		(553,521	)		(854,389	)		83,183		290,555			(1,011,791	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(173,543	)		(100,851	)		140,891			907,440			267,402		365,694			98,886

Other Financial Data:
EBITDA⁽²⁾	$	636,726		$	1,819,773		$	552,759		$	(466,298	)	$	814,367	$	457,673		$	1,098,685
Depreciation and amortization		515,520			579,070			622,867			756,169			995,663		708,352			895,104
Capital expenditures		619,772			805,474			678,865			705,147			570,316		407,535			969,758
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges⁽³⁾		1.3	x		13.0	x		—			—			—		—			2.4	x

Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
Cash⁽⁴⁾	$	596,511		$	1,293,165		$	869,997		$	1,006,655		$	1,313,367	$	1,075,939		$	1,185,177
Working capital		499,226			1,433,580			1,039,172			851,303			1,448,008		1,248,941			1,467,314

Total assets		4,377,698			5,767,735			5,647,242	⁽⁵⁾		5,710,318	⁽⁵⁾		7,049,772		6,664,365	⁽⁵⁾		7,282,439
Total long-term debt and capital lease obligations		1,474,908			1,297,543			635,705			1,640,055			2,092,940		2,081,576			2,043,044
Stockholders’ equity		1,979,273			3,171,667			3,555,055			2,467,265			2,438,310		2,282,784			2,571,442

(1)	Manufacturing joint venture refers to Fujitsu AMD Semiconductor Limited (FASL), our previous manufacturing joint venture with Fujitsu Limited, which was contributed to Spansion LLC in connection with the formation of Spansion LLC, effective June 30, 2003.

(2)

EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) before (i) interest income, (ii) interest expense, (iii) income tax, and (iv) depreciation and amortization. EBITDA does not include Fujitsu Limited’s 40 percent share of Spansion LLC’s net income or loss. Other companies in our industry may calculate EBITDA differently than we do and EBITDA as presented in this prospectus may not be comparable with similarly titled measures of other companies. We have included this non-GAAP financial measure because we believe that it provides noteholders with useful information in assessing our operating performance and as an indicator of our ability to service or incur indebtedness, make capital expenditures and finance working capital requirements. Depreciation and amortization, interest income and interest expense as set forth below represent amounts that are also attributable to the results of operations of Spansion LLC and its subsidiaries. EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities or as an alternative to net income as indicators of operating performance or any other measures of performance derived in accordance with GAAP. The reconciliation of net income (loss) to EBITDA is as follows:


	Fiscal Year Ended															Nine Months Ended
	Dec. 26, 1999			Dec. 31, 2000			Dec. 30, 2001			Dec. 29, 2002			Dec. 28, 2003			Sept. 28, 2003			Sept. 26, 2004
	(in thousands)
Net income (loss)	$	(88,936	)	$	983,026		$	(60,581	)	$	(1,303,012	)	$	(274,490	)	$	(317,683	)	$	121,119
Depreciation and amortization		515,520			579,070			622,867			756,169			995,663			708,352			895,104
Interest income		(26,461	)		(59,228	)		(56,424	)		(35,390	)		(19,702	)		(14,949	)		(11,615	)

Interest expense		69,253			60,037			61,360			71,349			109,960			79,017			83,258
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		167,350			256,868			(14,463	)		44,586			2,936			2,936			10,819
EBITDA	$	636,726		$	1,819,773		$	552,759		$	(466,298	)	$	814,367		$	457,673		$	1,098,685

(3)

For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, fixed charges consist of interest expense on long-term debt and capital leases, amortization of deferred financing costs and that portion of rental expense deemed to be representative of interest. Earnings consist of income (loss) before income taxes and equity in joint venture, plus fixed charges. For the fiscal years ended 2001, 2002, 2003 and nine months ended September 28, 2003, earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $76 million, $1,253 million, $301 million and $329 million, respectively.

(4)	Cash includes cash and cash equivalents, compensating balance and short-term investments.

(5)

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes incorporated by reference in this prospectus and our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes as of December 28, 2003 and December 29, 2002, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 28, 2003 as filed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2003. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. The following discussion should also be read, together with the whole of this prospectus, in conjunction with the documents listed in the section “Incorporation by Reference.” The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. See the disclosure regarding “Forward-Looking Statements” at the front of this prospectus.

Overview

We design, manufacture and market industry-standard digital integrated circuits, or ICs, that are used in diverse product applications such as desktop and mobile PCs, workstations, servers, communications equipment such as mobile phones and automotive and consumer electronics. Our products consist primarily of microprocessors and Flash memory devices. We also sell low power, high performance x86 and MIPS^{^®} architecture-based embedded microprocessors for personal connectivity devices.

We believe critical success factors include: continuing to increase market acceptance of our AMD64 technology, particularly in the enterprise segment; strengthening our relationships with key customers and establishing relationships with new customers that are industry leaders in their markets; successfully developing and continuing to transition to the latest manufacturing process technologies for both our microprocessor and Flash memory products; developing and introducing new microprocessor products for the mobile, server and workstation markets on a timely basis and increasing our share of those markets; expanding our participation in high-growth global markets, including China, Latin America, India and Eastern Europe; and improving our share of the Flash memory market, including increasing the adoption of MirrorBit technology.

We have two reportable segments:

•

the Computation Products segment, which includes microprocessor products for desktop and mobile PCs, servers and workstations and chipset products; and

•

the Memory Products segment, which primarily consists of Spansion Flash memory products.

We review and assess operating performance using segment net sales and operating income before interest, taxes and minority interest. These performance measures include the allocation of expenses to the operating segments based on management’s judgment. Prior to the third quarter of 2003, we had two reportable segments: the Core Products and Foundry Services segments. Primarily as a result of the formation of Spansion LLC, effective as of June 30, 2003, we re-evaluated our reportable segments, and beginning in the third quarter of 2003, we changed our reportable segments to the Computation Products segment and the Memory Products segment. We believe that separate reporting of these operating segments, given our focus on Spansion LLC as an operating entity with its own brand—Spansion, provides more useful information to investors.

In addition to our reportable segments, we also have the All Other category that is not a reportable segment, but rather includes other small operating segments that are neither individually nor in the aggregate greater than ten percent of our consolidated net sales or assets. This category also includes certain operating expenses and credits that are not allocated to the operating segments.

Prior period segment information has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. However, because Spansion LLC did not exist prior to June 30, 2003, the results of our operations for periods prior to the third quarter of 2003 do not include the consolidation of Spansion LLC’s results of operations.

Accordingly, our operating results for nine months ended September 26, 2004 are not fully comparable with our results for nine months ended September 28, 2003 and the segment operating information for the Memory Products segment for nine months ended September 26, 2004 is not fully comparable to the reclassified segment information for nine months ended September 28, 2003.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts in our consolidated financial statements. We evaluate our estimates on an on-going basis, including those related to our net sales, inventories, asset impairments, restructuring charges, income taxes, and commitments and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Although actual results have historically been reasonably consistent with management’s expectations, the actual results may differ in the future from these estimates or our estimates may be affected by different assumptions or conditions.

We believe the following critical accounting policies are the most significant to the presentation of our financial statements and require the most difficult, subjective and complex judgments:

Revenue Reserves

We record a provision for estimated product returns and allowances on product sales and a provision for estimated future price reductions in the same period that the related revenues are recorded. We base these estimates on management judgment while considering actual historical sales returns, historical price reductions, market activity, allowances, and other known or anticipated trends and factors. Actual provisions could be different from our estimates and current provisions, resulting in future adjustments to our revenues and operating results.

Inventory Valuation

At each balance sheet date, we evaluate our ending inventories for excess quantities and obsolescence. This evaluation includes analysis of sales levels by product and projections of future demand. These projections assist us in determining the carrying value of our inventory and are also used for near-term factory production planning. Inventories on hand in excess of forecasted demand of generally six months or less, are not valued. In addition, we write off inventories that are considered obsolete. Among other factors, management considers forecasted demand in relation to the inventory on hand, competitiveness of product offerings, market conditions and product life cycles when determining obsolescence and net realizable value. We adjust remaining inventory balances to approximate the lower of our standard manufacturing cost or market value. If we anticipate future demand or market conditions to be less favorable than our projections, additional inventory write-downs may be required, and would be reflected in cost of sales in the period the revision is made. This would have a negative impact on our gross margins in that period. If in any period we are able to sell inventories that were not valued or that had been written off in a previous period, related revenues would be recorded without any offsetting charge to cost of sales, resulting in a net benefit to our gross margin in that period. To the extent these factors materially affect our gross margins, we would disclose them.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We consider no less frequently than quarterly whether indicators of impairment of long-lived assets are present. These indicators may include, but are not limited to, significant decreases in the market value of an asset and significant changes in the extent or manner in which an asset is used. If these or other indicators are present,

we determine whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows attributable to the assets in question are less than their carrying value. If less, we recognize an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount of the assets over their respective fair values. Fair value is determined by discounted future cash flows, appraisals or other methods. If the asset determined to be impaired is to be held and used, we recognize an impairment loss through a charge to our operating results to the extent the present value of anticipated net cash flows attributable to the asset is less than the asset’s carrying value, which we depreciate over the remaining estimated useful life of the asset. We may incur additional impairment losses in future periods if factors influencing our estimates of the undiscounted cash flows change.

Restructuring Charges

We record and account for our restructuring activities following formally approved plans that identify the actions and timeline over which the restructuring activities will occur. Restructuring charges include estimates pertaining to employee severance and fringe benefit costs, facility exit costs, subleasing assumptions and facility and equipment decommissioning costs resulting from exiting certain facilities. We review remaining restructuring accruals on a quarterly basis and adjust these accruals when changes in facts and circumstances suggest actual amounts will differ from our estimates. Although we do not anticipate significant changes, actual costs may be different than our original or revised estimates. These changes in estimates can result in increases or decreases to our results of operations in future periods and would be presented on the restructuring and other special charges, net, line of our consolidated operating statements.

Income Taxes

In determining taxable income for financial statement reporting purposes, we must make certain estimates and judgments. These estimates and judgments are applied in the calculation of certain tax liabilities and in the determination of the recoverability of deferred tax assets, which arise from temporary differences between the recognition of assets and liabilities for tax and financial statement reporting purposes.

We must assess the likelihood that we will be able to recover our deferred tax assets. If recovery is not likely, we must increase our provision for taxes by recording a charge to income tax expense, in the form of a valuation allowance, for the deferred tax assets that we estimate will not ultimately be recoverable. We consider past performance, future expected taxable income and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in determining the need for a valuation allowance. In fiscal 2002, we recorded a valuation allowance against all of our U.S. deferred tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities, based on past performance and the likelihood of realization of our deferred tax assets at the time. In fiscal 2003, we continued to provide a valuation allowance against all of our U.S. deferred tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities. If we later determine that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets will be realized, an appropriate amount of the previously provided valuation allowance will be reversed, resulting in a benefit to our earnings. Such benefits would be recorded on the income tax provision (benefit) line of our statement of operations.

In addition, the calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax rules and the potential for future adjustment by the Internal Revenue Service or other taxing jurisdiction. If our estimates of these taxes are greater or less than actual results, an additional tax benefit or charge will result.

Commitments and Contingencies

From time to time we are a defendant or plaintiff in various legal actions that arise in the normal course of business. We are also a party to environmental matters, including local, regional, state and federal government clean-up activities at or near locations where we currently or have in the past conducted our business. We are also a guarantor of various third-party obligations and commitments. We are required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A

determination of the amount of reserves required for these commitments and contingencies, if any, that would be charged to earnings includes assessing the probability of adverse outcomes and estimating the amount of potential losses. The required reserves may change in the future due to new developments in each matter or changes in circumstances, such as a change in settlement strategy. Changes in required reserves could increase or decrease our earnings in the period the changes are made.

Results of Operations

Effective June 30, 2003, we and Fujitsu formed Spansion LLC. As a result of the transaction, we began consolidating Spansion LLC’s results of operations on June 30, 2003. Prior to June 30, 2003, we accounted for our share of the manufacturing joint venture’s operating results under the equity method. As Spansion LLC did not exist prior to June 30, 2003, the results of our operations for periods prior to the third quarter of 2003 do not include the consolidation of Spansion LLC’s results of operations. Accordingly, our operating results for the quarter and nine months ended September 26, 2004 are not fully comparable with our results for the quarter and nine months ended September 28, 2003 and our segment operating information for the Memory Products segment for the quarter and nine months ended September 26, 2004 is not fully comparable to the reclassified segment information for the quarter and nine months ended September 28, 2003. As we have a 60 percent controlling interest in Spansion LLC, Fujitsu’s 40 percent share in the net income (loss) of Spansion LLC is reflected as a minority interest adjustment to our consolidated financial statements. This minority interest adjustment will not correspond to Memory Products segment operating income (loss) because Memory Products segment operating income (loss) includes operations incremental to those of Spansion LLC. In addition, the minority interest calculation is based on Spansion LLC’s net income (loss) rather than operating income (loss).

Year to Year Comparison

We use a 52- to 53-week fiscal year ending on the last Sunday in December. The following is a summary of our net sales for 2001, 2002 and 2003.


	2001		2002		2003
	(in millions)
Computation Products	$	2,466	$	1,756	$	1,960
Memory Products		1,133		741		1,419
All Other		293		200		140

Total Net Sales	$	3,892	$	2,697	$	3,519

Net Sales Comparison for Years Ended December 28, 2003 and December 29, 2002

Total net sales of $3,519 million in 2003 increased 30 percent compared to net sales of $2,697 million in 2002.

Computation Products net sales of $1,960 million in 2003 increased 12 percent compared to net sales of $1,756 million in 2002. The increase in net sales resulted primarily from a 15 percent increase in microprocessor unit shipments due primarily to increased demand from our OEM customers, partially offset by a four percent decline in the average selling prices of our microprocessor products. Unit shipment growth was particularly strong in Latin America and China, which accounted for 77 percent of overall unit growth.

Memory Products net sales of $1,419 million in 2003 increased 92 percent compared to net sales of $741 million in 2002. The increase in net sales was primarily attributable to the effect of consolidating Spansion LLC’s results of operations, which include Spansion LLC’s sales to Fujitsu, and increased demand for Flash memory products. Further quantification of the breakdown in the increase in net sales is not practical due to the reorganization of geographical sales territories between AMD and Fujitsu.

All Other net sales of $140 million in 2003 decreased 30 percent compared to net sales of $200 million in 2002 and consisted primarily of net sales of our Personal Connectivity Solutions Group products. The decrease was due to a $53 million decrease in revenue resulting from discontinued production of selected mature embedded processors and networking products and a $34 million decrease in foundry services revenues, offset by a $28 million increase in revenues from sales of AMD Geode and wireless products.

Net Sales Comparison for Years Ended December 29, 2002 and December 30, 2001

Total net sales of $2,697 million in 2002 decreased 31 percent compared to net sales of $3,892 million in 2001.

Computation Products net sales of $1,756 million in 2002 decreased 29 percent compared to net sales of $2,466 million in 2001. This decrease was almost wholly due to a decrease in unit sales of 16 percent, and a decrease in average selling prices of 13 percent, reflecting an industry-wide weakness in PC sales, competitive pricing pressure, and the execution of our plan to align our microprocessor inventory in the supply chain with forecasted customer demand, which included our decision to limit shipments and accept receipt of product returns from certain customers.

Memory Products net sales of $741 million in 2002 decreased 35 percent compared to net sales of $1,133 million in 2001. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in average selling prices of 36 percent, reflecting continued weakness in the communications and networking equipment industries.

All Other net sales of $200 million in 2002 decreased 32 percent compared to net sales of $293 million in 2001. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in foundry services revenues of approximately $64 million and a decrease in net sales of $31 million from embedded processors and networking products as a result of sustained market declines in the communications and networking equipment industries.

Comparison of Expenses, Gross Margin, Interest Income and Other, Net, Interest Expense and Taxes

The following table is a summary of gross margin, expenses and interest income and other, net, and interest expense for 2001, 2002 and 2003:


	2001			2002			2003
	(in millions, except for percentages)
Cost of sales	$	2,590		$	2,106		$	2,327
Gross margin		33	%		22	%		34	%
Research and development	$	651		$	816		$	852
Marketing, general and administrative		620			670			587
Restructuring and other special charges, net		89			331			(14	)
Interest income and other, net		26			32			21
Interest expense		61			71			110
Income tax provision (benefit)		(14	)		45			3

Gross margin increased to 34 percent in 2003 compared to 22 percent in 2002. The increase in gross margin was primarily due to an increase in net sales of 30 percent, accompanied by an increase in cost of sales of only ten percent. Our cost of sales increased at a lower rate than net sales primarily due to cost reductions from the 2002 Restructuring Plan and other cost reduction initiatives. In addition, microprocessor unit sales increased 15 percent while average selling prices of microprocessor products decreased by 4 percent, and we realized $63 million, or approximately 2 percentage points resulting from the sale of microprocessor products that had been previously written off. Further quantification of the improvement in gross margin is not practical due to the consolidation of Spansion LLC’s operating results on June 30, 2003.

We amortize capital grants and allowances, interest subsidies and research and development subsidies that we receive from the State of Saxony and the Federal Republic of Germany for Fab 30 as they are earned. The amortization of these grants and subsidies is recognized as credits to research and development expenses and cost of sales. The credits to cost of sales totaled $46.2 million in 2003 and $36.5 million in 2002.

Gross margin decreased to 22 percent in 2002 compared to 33 percent in 2001. This decrease was primarily due to a 31 percent decrease in the combined sales of PC processors and Flash memory products, as a result of lower unit demand and average selling prices due to weakened customer demand and industry-wide excess inventory, partially offset by cost savings realized from the closure of certain facilities pursuant to the 2001 Restructuring Plan, which is discussed below.

Research and development expenses of $852 million in 2003 increased four percent from $816 million in 2002 due primarily to an increase in expenses as a result of the Spansion LLC transaction, $23 million in research and development efforts related to new microprocessors, and $58 million in expenses related to amounts paid to IBM to jointly develop new logic process technologies for use in future high-performance microprocessor products. These increases were offset by a $35 million reduction in internal research and development costs from 2002 to 2003, primarily due to the reduction of research and development activities associated with our embedded microprocessors for personal connectivity devices and the absence of the $42 million charge representing amounts paid to IBM in 2002 in exchange for consulting services relating to optimizing the performance of our manufacturing processes.

We amortize capital grants and allowances, interest subsidies and research and development subsidies that we receive from the State of Saxony and the Federal Republic of Germany for Fab 30 as they are earned. The amortization of these grants and subsidies is recognized as credits to research and development expenses and cost of sales. The credits to research and development expenses totaled $29.0 million in 2003 and $22.8 million in 2002.

Research and development expenses of $816 million in 2002 increased 25 percent compared to $651 million in 2001. This increase was primarily due to an overall increase in research and development efforts directed to our microprocessors. In addition, research and development expenses in 2002 included a $42 million charge for amounts paid to IBM in exchange for consulting services relating to optimizing the performance of our manufacturing processes in the fourth quarter of 2002, as well as the reallocation of $30 million from manufacturing resources, previously included in costs of goods sold, to research and development activities for microprocessors.

Marketing, general and administrative expenses of $587 million in 2003 decreased 12 percent compared to $670 million in 2002. The decrease was primarily due to decreased cooperative advertising and marketing expenses of $55 million and cost reductions from the 2002 Restructuring Plan and other cost reduction initiatives.

Marketing, general and administrative expenses of $670 million in 2002 increased eight percent compared to $620 million in 2001 primarily as a result of increased advertising and marketing expenses associated with the launch of our branding campaign.

Effects of Our 2002 Restructuring Plan

In December 2002, we began implementing a restructuring plan (the 2002 Restructuring Plan) to further align our cost structure to industry conditions resulting from weak customer demand and industry-wide excess inventory.

As part of this plan, and as a result of our agreement with IBM to jointly develop future generations of our logic process technology, we ceased logic research and development in our Submicron Development Center, or SDC, and eliminated most of those related resources, including the sale or abandonment of certain equipment used in the SDC.

The 2002 Restructuring Plan resulted in the consolidation of facilities, primarily at our Sunnyvale, California site and at sales offices worldwide. We vacated and are attempting to sublease certain facilities currently occupied under long-term operating leases through 2013. We also terminated the implementation of certain partially completed ERP software and other information technology implementation activities, resulting in the abandonment of certain software, hardware and capitalized development costs.

Pursuant to the 2002 Restructuring Plan, we recorded restructuring costs and other special charges of $330.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2002, consisting primarily of anticipated exit costs of $138.9 million almost wholly related to vacating and consolidating our facilities, $68.8 million of anticipated severance and fringe benefit costs, a charge of $55.5 million resulting from the abandonment of partially completed ERP software and other information technology implementation activities, an asset impairment charge of $32.5 million relating to a license that has no future use because of its association with discontinued logic development activities, and asset impairment charges of $30.6 million resulting from the abandonment of equipment previously used in logic process development and manufacturing activities.

During 2003, management approved the sale of additional equipment, primarily equipment used in the SDC, that was identified as no longer useful in our operations. As a result, we recorded approximately $11 million of asset impairment charges in the first quarter of 2003, including $3.3 million of charges for decommission costs necessary to complete the sale of the equipment.

During 2003, we revised our estimates of the number of positions to be eliminated pursuant to the 2002 Restructuring Plan from 2,000 to 1,800 in response to the additional resources required due to the creation of Spansion LLC. As a result, we reversed $8.9 million of the estimated severance and fringe benefit accrual. As of December 28, 2003, 1,736 employees had been terminated pursuant to the 2002 Restructuring Plan resulting in cumulative cash payments of $53 million in severance and employee benefit costs. The remaining accrual of $6.7 million represents the severance benefits cost obligations for individuals whose employments terminated but who elected to defer receipt of severance benefits until 2004 and for employees who were pre-notified in 2003 of their employment terminations to occur in 2004.

With the exception of exit costs consisting primarily of remaining lease payments on abandoned facilities, net of estimated sublease income that are payable through 2011, we have substantially completed the activities associated with the 2002 Restructuring Plan as of December 28, 2003. As a result of the 2002 Restructuring Plan, we realized overall cost reductions of approximately $150 million in 2003. We also implemented other cost reduction initiatives incremental to the specific expense reductions resulting from the 2002 Restructuring Plan.

The following table summarizes activities under the 2002 Restructuring Plan through December 28, 2003:


	Severance and Employee Benefits			Asset Impairment			Exit Costs			Other Restructuring Charges			Total
	(in thousands)
2002 provision	$	68,770		$	118,590		$	138,900		$	4,315		$	330,575
Non-cash charges		—			(118,590	)		—			—			(118,590	)
Cash charges		(14,350	)		—			(795	)		—			(15,145	)

Accrual at December 29, 2002		54,420			—			138,105			4,315			196,840
2003 provision		—			7,791			3,314			—			11,105
Cash charges		(38,816	)		—			(20,796	)		(4,300	)		(63,912	)
Non-cash charges		—			(7,791	)		—			—			(7,791	)
Non-cash adjustment		(8,864	)					—			(15	)		(8,879	)

Accrual at December 28, 2003	$	6,740		$	—		$	120,623		$	—		$	127,363

Effects of Our 2001 Restructuring Plan

In 2001, we announced a restructuring plan (the 2001 Restructuring Plan) due to the continued slowdown in the semiconductor industry and a resulting decline in revenues. We substantially completed our execution of the 2001 Restructuring Plan as of December 28, 2003. During 2003, we reduced the estimated accrual of the facility and equipment decommission costs by $12.2 million based on the most current information available. During 2003, we also realized a recovery of approximately $3.9 million for the excess of the sale price over the estimated fair value of equipment that was determined to be impaired as a result of the 2001 Restructuring Plan. Both amounts were included in restructuring and other special charges, net. As a result of the 2001 Restructuring Plan, we have realized overall cost reductions of $211 million as of December 28, 2003.

The following table summarizes activity under the 2001 Restructuring Plan through December 28, 2003:


	Severance and Employee Benefits			Facility and Equipment Impairment			Facilities and Equipment Decommission Costs			Other Facilities Exit Costs			Total
	(in thousands)
2001 provision	$	34,105		$	39,000		$	15,500		$	700		$	89,305
2001 cash charges		(7,483	)		—			—			(54	)		(7,537	)
2001 non-cash charges		—			(39,000	)		—			—			(39,000	)

Accrual at December 30, 2001		26,622			—			15,500			646			42,768
2002 cash charges		(26,622	)		—			(445	)		—			(27,067	)

Accrual at December 29, 2002		—			—			15,055			646			15,701
Non-cash adjustments		—			—			(11,574	)		(646	)		(12,220	)
Cash charges		—			—			(2,485	)		—			(2,485	)

Accrual at December 28, 2003	$	—		$	—		$	996		$	—		$	996

Interest Income and Other, Net

Interest income and other, net, of approximately $21 million in 2003 decreased 34 percent from $32 million in 2002. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in investment income of $16 million caused by lower cash equivalents and short-term investment balances and $2.3 million in charges in 2003 for other-than-temporary declines in our equity investments. This decrease was offset by a gain of approximately $6 million based on the difference between the carrying value and fair value of assets contributed by us to Spansion LLC. Fujitsu now owns a 40 percent interest in these assets. The gain on the deemed sale of these assets to Spansion LLC was limited to the difference in carrying value of our interest in the assets following the completion of the transaction and the carrying value of the assets immediately prior to the transaction.

Interest income and other, net, of $32 million in 2002 increased 23 percent compared to $26 million in 2001. The increase was primarily due to $4.7 million in charges for other-than-temporary declines in our equity investments as compared to $27 million in charges in 2001, offset by a decrease of $20 million in interest income as a result of lower interest rates on our investment portfolio and lower cash equivalents and short term investment balances.

Interest Expense

Interest expense of $110 million in 2003 increased 55 percent compared to $71 million in 2002. The increase was due primarily to the effect of our 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2007, or the 4.50% Notes, issued in November 2002, which resulted in annual interest charges, including amortization of financing costs, of $20 million, interest of $6 million on $110 million drawn at the end of September 2002 under our July 2003 Loan Agreement, and the Spansion LLC transaction, which resulted in additional interest expense of approximately $6 million in 2003. In addition, in 2002 we capitalized interest of $10.7 million on continued expansion and facilitization of Fabs 25 and 30 compared to only $1.5 million in 2003.

Interest expense of $71 million in 2002 increased 16 percent compared to $61 million in 2001. The increase was due primarily to the effect of interest expense incurred on our 4.75% Convertible Senior Debentures due 2022, or the 4.75% Debentures, issued in January 2002, which resulted in interest charges of $22 million, partially offset by an increase in capitalized interest associated with conversion of Fab 25 to a Flash memory facility, facilitization activities at Fab 30, and a decrease of $9 million in interest expense due to a partial repayment of the outstanding loans under the Dresden Loan Agreements in 2002.

Income Taxes

We recorded an income tax provision of $3 million in 2003, an income tax provision of $45 million in 2002 and an income tax benefit of $14 million in 2001. The income tax provision in 2003 primarily reflected income tax expense generated in certain foreign tax jurisdictions, offset by a benefit of a U.S. federal tax refund from a carryback claim we filed in 2003. No net tax benefit was recorded in 2003 on pre-tax losses due to continuing operating losses. Our tax provision for 2003 does not reflect an increase in our net deferred tax liability of approximately $46 million. This net deferred tax liability was recognized by the Japanese subsidiary of Spansion LLC, Spansion Japan Limited, as tax expense in periods prior to our consolidation of Spansion LLC on June 30, 2003, and therefore has not been recorded as a component of our tax expense for 2003. The 2002 income tax provision was recorded primarily for taxes due on income generated in certain state and foreign tax jurisdictions. No tax benefit was recorded in 2002 on pre-tax losses due to the establishment of a valuation allowance against the remainder of our U.S. deferred tax assets, net of U.S. deferred tax liabilities in the fourth quarter, due to the incurrence of continuing substantial operating losses in the U.S. The effective benefit rate of 15.4 percent for 2001 was less than the statutory rate because of a lower than U.S. statutory 24 percent tax benefit rate on the 2001 restructuring charges, reflecting the allocation of the charges between the U.S. and foreign lower-taxed jurisdictions, and a provision for U.S. taxes on certain previously undistributed earnings of lower-taxed foreign subsidiaries.

Other Items

Our international sales as a percent of net sales were 80 percent in 2003, compared to 73 percent in 2002 and 67 percent in 2001. The following table summarizes sales by geographic areas as of and for each of the three years ended December 28, 2003:


	2001		2002		2003
	(in thousands)
Sales to external customers:
United States⁽¹⁾	$	1,282,663	$	736,566	$	720,679
Japan		217,667		251,673		575,479
Korea		279,898		339,740		316,893
Europe		1,492,428		945,836		1,179,474
Other Countries		619,098		423,214		726,643

	$	3,891,754	$	2,697,029	$	3,519,168

(1)	Includes an insignificant amount of sales in Canada.

During 2003, approximately 15 percent of our net sales were denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the Japanese yen, as compared to one percent during 2002. The increase was primarily due to the consolidation of Spansion LLC’s results of operations, which include sales by Spansion LLC to Fujitsu, which are denominated in yen. Our foreign exchange risk exposure resulting from these sales is partially mitigated as a result of our yen-denominated manufacturing costs. In addition, we are subject to foreign currency risk related to our manufacturing costs in Fab 30, which are denominated in euros. We use foreign currency forward and option contracts to reduce our exposure to the euro, but future exchange rate fluctuations may cause increases or decreases to our Fab 30 manufacturing costs. The impact on our operating results from changes in foreign currency rates individually and in the aggregate has not been material, principally as a result of our foreign currency hedging activities.

Comparison of Operating Income (Loss)

The following is a summary of operating income (loss) for 2001, 2002 and 2003:


	2001			2002			2003
	(in millions)
Computation Products	$	(191	)	$	(661	)	$	(23	)
Memory Products		268			(159	)		(189	)
All Other		(135	)		(405	)		(21	)

Total Operating Income (Loss)	$	(58	)	$	(1,225	)	$	(233	)

Computation Products operating loss of $23 million in 2003 improved by $638 million compared to an operating loss of $661 million in 2002. The improvement was primarily due to incremental net sales of $204 million and a decrease in both manufacturing costs of $330 million and marketing, general and administrative expenses of $39 million, which resulted primarily from our cost reduction initiatives and the 2002 Restructuring Plan. In addition, cooperative advertising and marketing expenses decreased by $55 million from 2002.

Computation Products operating loss of $661 million in 2002 increased by $470 million compared to an operating loss of $191 million in 2001 primarily due to a decrease in net sales. The decrease was primarily due to a decline in average selling prices of 13 percent and a decline in unit sales of 16 percent for microprocessors as a result of the sustained downturn in the PC industry.

Memory Products operating loss of $189 million in 2003 increased $30 million from 2002. Further quantification of the changes is not practical due to the consolidation of Spansion LLC on June 30, 2003.

Memory Products operating loss was $159 million in 2002 compared to $268 million of operating income in 2001. The change in the operating result was primarily due to decrease in net sales of $392 million as a result of a 36 percent decline in average selling prices due to continued weakness in the Flash memory market.

Our All Other operating loss of $21 million in 2003 improved by $384 million compared to 2002, primarily due to $331 million of restructuring and other special charges included in the 2002 results, and a $14 million credit adjustment to the restructuring charge in 2003.

Our All Other operating loss of $405 million in 2002 increased by $270 million compared to 2001. The operating loss included $331 million of restructuring and other special charges in 2002 compared to approximately $89 million in 2001. The remaining increase of operating loss was primarily due to an increase in operating loss of Personal Connectivity Solutions Group products, partially offset by approximately $27 million of improvement of operating results in foundry services.

Quarter to Quarter and Nine-Month to Nine-Month Comparison

The quarters ended September 26, 2004, June 27, 2004 and September 28, 2003 each included 13 weeks. The nine months ended September 26, 2004 and September 28, 2003 each included 39 weeks. The following is a summary of our net sales and operating income (loss) by segment and category for the periods presented below:


	Quarter Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 26, 2004			June 27, 2004			September 28, 2003			September 26, 2004			September 28, 2003
	(in millions)
Net sales
Computation Products	$	672		$	554		$	503		$	1,797		$	1,379
Memory Products		538			673			424			1,839			853
All Other		29			35			27			101			82

Total	$	1,239		$	1,262		$	954		$	3,737		$	2,314

Operating income (loss)
Computation Products	$	89		$	57		$	19		$	214		$	(86	)
Memory Products		15			45			(49	)		74			(187	)
All Other		(36	)		(30	)		—			(86	)		(6	)

Total	$	68		$	72		$	(30	)	$	202		$	(279	)

Computation Products

Computation Products net sales of $672 million in the third quarter of 2004 increased 21 percent compared to net sales of $554 million in the second quarter of 2004. The increase in net sales was driven primarily by increased microprocessor sales across all markets, with a 12 percent increase in average selling prices and a nine percent increase in unit shipments. Unit shipments of our AMD Athlon 64 microprocessors nearly doubled from the second quarter of 2004.

Computation Products net sales of $672 million in the third quarter of 2004 increased 34 percent compared to net sales of $503 million in the third quarter of 2003, primarily as a result of a 23 percent increase in average selling prices and a nine percent increase in unit shipments. Unit shipments increased due to improving market conditions across all geographic regions, especially North America and Asia. Average selling prices increased primarily as a result of increased sales of our higher-priced AMD Opteron and AMD Athlon 64 microprocessors, which we introduced in April 2003 and September 2003.

Computation Products net sales of $1,797 million in the first nine months of 2004 increased 30 percent compared to $1,379 million in the first nine months of 2003. Net sales increased primarily as a result of a 24 percent increase in average selling prices and a five percent increase in unit shipments. Average selling prices increased primarily as a result of sales of our higher-priced AMD Opteron and AMD Athlon 64 microprocessors. Unit shipments increased primarily as a result of improving market conditions across all geographic regions.

Computation Products operating income of $89 million in the third quarter of 2004 improved $32 million from operating income of $57 million in the second quarter of 2004, primarily as a result of an increase in microprocessor sales across all markets, with a 12 percent increase in average selling prices and a nine percent increase in unit shipments.

Computation Products operating income in the third quarter of 2004 improved by $70 million compared to operating income of $19 million in the third quarter of 2003, primarily as a result of improving market conditions across all geographic regions, which contributed to the nine percent increase in unit shipments and 23 percent increase in average selling prices referenced above.

Computation Products operating income of $214 million in the first nine months of 2004 improved from an operating loss of $86 million in the first nine months of 2003. This improvement was primarily due to an increase in microprocessor sales. Net sales increased as a result of the 24 percent increase in average selling prices and the five percent increase in unit shipments referenced above.

Memory Products

Memory Products net sales of $538 million in the third quarter of 2004 decreased 20 percent compared to net sales of $673 million in the second quarter of 2004. The decrease in net sales was primarily attributable to a 14 percent decrease in unit shipments and seven percent decrease in average selling prices. In particular, net sales in Asia decreased 21 percent primarily due to a decrease in demand from the wireless handset market, in part due to channel inventory accumulation by wireless handset OEMs in China.

Memory Products net sales of $538 million in the third quarter of 2004 increased 27 percent compared to net sales of $424 million in the third quarter of 2003. The increase in net sales was primarily attributable to a 22 percent increase in average selling prices and a five percent increase in unit shipments of Spansion Flash memory products. Average selling prices and unit shipments increased from the third quarter of 2003 due to increased market demand, especially in Asia, where net sales increased 40 percent compared to third quarter of 2003.

Memory Products net sales of $1,839 million in the first nine months of 2004 increased 116 percent compared to net sales of $853 million in the first nine months of 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to the effect of consolidating the operating results of Spansion LLC, effective June 30, 2003, which include Spansion LLC’s sales to Fujitsu, as well as increased demand for Flash memory products. Further quantification of the breakdown in the sales increase is not practical due to the reorganization of customers and geographical sales territories between AMD and Fujitsu.

Memory Products operating income of $15 million in the third quarter of 2004 decreased by $30 million compared to operating income of $45 million in the second quarter of 2004. The decrease in operating income was primarily due to a 20 percent decrease in Memory Products net sales. As stated above, Memory Products net sales decreased primarily as a result of decreased demand from the wireless handset market in Asia and to a lesser extent in Europe, in part due to channel inventory accumulation by wireless handset OEMs in China. The impact of this decrease was partially offset by a decline in manufacturing costs due to our transition to 110-nanometer process technology for certain of our Flash memory products as well as increased shipments of Flash memory products based on MirrorBit technology.

Memory Products operating income of $15 million in the third quarter of 2004 improved by $64 million from an operating loss of $49 million in the third quarter of 2003. The improvement was primarily due to an increase in net sales of 27 percent, a decline in manufacturing costs due to our transition to smaller process technology, increased shipments of Flash memory products based on MirrorBit technology and benefits realized from the integration of our and Fujitsu’s Flash memory operations.

Memory Products operating income of $74 million in the first nine months of 2004 improved $261 million from an operating loss of $187 million in the first nine months of 2003. This improvement was primarily due to the effect of consolidating the operating results of Spansion LLC, which include Spansion LLC’s sales to Fujitsu, as well as improving market demand for Flash memory products during the first two quarters of 2004. Further quantification of the improvement in operating results is not practical due to the consolidation of Spansion LLC’s results of operations on June 30, 2003, which include sales to Fujitsu.

All Other Category

All Other net sales of $29 million in the third quarter of 2004 decreased 15 percent compared to net sales of $35 million in the second quarter of 2004 primarily due to a decrease in demand for certain of our embedded microprocessor and networking products.

All Other net sales of $29 million in the third quarter of 2004 were relatively flat compared to net sales of $27 million in the third quarter of 2003.

All Other net sales of $101 million in the first nine months of 2004 increased 24 percent compared to $82 million in the first nine months of 2003, primarily due to sales of certain new embedded microprocessor products.

All Other operating loss of $36 million in the third quarter of 2004 increased by $6 million compared to an operating loss of $30 million in the second quarter of 2004, primarily due to a decrease in demand for certain of our embedded microprocessor and networking products.

All Other operating loss of $36 million in the third quarter of 2004 increased by $36 million from the third quarter of 2003. Operating loss increased primarily due to an increase in profit sharing and bonus expenses of approximately $17 million, the absence in the third quarter of 2004 of a reversal of restructuring costs of $8 million in connection with our 2002 Restructuring Plan recorded in the third quarter of 2003 and a write-down of inventory of approximately $6 million for certain of our personal connectivity solutions products. We reversed $8 million of restructuring costs in the third quarter of 2003 because we revised our estimated severance and fringe benefits costs due to the additional resources required in connection with the Spansion LLC transaction and our related decision to reduce the number of positions to be eliminated by 200. We decided to write-down the value of inventory related to certain of our personal connectivity solutions products because we revised our estimate of forecasted sales levels after evaluating demand for these products.

All Other operating loss of $86 million in the first nine months of 2004 increased by $80 million from an operating loss of $6 million in the first nine months of 2003. Operating loss increased primarily due to an increase in profit sharing and bonus expenses of approximately $36 million, a write-down of the value of inventory for certain of our personal connectivity solutions products of approximately $12 million, an increase in manufacturing costs related to our personal connectivity solutions products of approximately $33 million and the absence in 2004 of a reversal of restructuring costs of $8 million recorded in the third quarter of 2003 referenced above.

Comparison of Expenses, Gross Margin, Interest Income and Other, Net, Interest Expense and Taxes

The following table is a summary of certain consolidated statement of operations data for the periods indicated:


	Quarters Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 26, 2004			June 27, 2004			September 28, 2003			September 26, 2004			September 28, 2003
	(in millions except for percentages)
Cost of sales	$	738		$	783		$	627		$	2,290		$	1,549
Gross margin		40	%		38	%		34	%		39	%		33	%
Research and development	$	231		$	225		$	214		$	682		$	626
Marketing, general and administrative		202			179			151			561			425
Restructuring and other special charges, net		—			3			(8	)		3			(6	)
Interest income and other, net		3			(2	)		0			11			12
Interest expense		(25	)		(28	)		(27	)		(83	)		(79	)
Income tax provision		5			4			—			11			3

The gross margin of 40 percent in the third quarter of 2004 improved from 38 percent in the second quarter of 2004 and from 34 percent in the third quarter of 2003. The improvement in gross margin from the second quarter of 2004 was primarily due to increased net sales of our higher-margin AMD Athlon 64 and AMD Opteron microprocessor products and reduced manufacturing costs due to our transition to smaller process technology for Flash memory products, partially offset by a decrease in net sales of our Flash memory products.

The improvement in gross margin from the third quarter of 2003 was primarily due to a richer product mix and improving market conditions, which resulted in higher average selling prices for both our microprocessor and Flash memory products. Gross margin of 39 percent in the first nine months of 2004 improved from 33 percent in the first nine months of 2003. The improvement was primarily due to a richer product mix, higher average selling prices for both our microprocessor and Flash memory products, cost reductions from the 2002 Restructuring Plan and other cost reduction initiatives. Further quantification of changes in the improvement in gross margin is not practical due to the consolidation of Spansion LLC’s operating results, effective on June 30, 2003.

We amortize capital grants and allowances and interest subsidies that we receive from the State of Saxony and the Federal Republic of Germany for Fab 30 as they are earned. The amortization of these grants and subsidies is recognized as credits to cost of sales. The credits to cost of sales totaled $17.5 million in the third quarter of 2004, $17.0 million in the second quarter of 2004 and $11.6 million in the third quarter of 2003. In the first nine months of 2004, such credits totaled $48.0 million, and in the first nine months of 2003, such credits totaled $33.6 million. The fluctuations in these credits have not significantly impacted our gross margins.

Research and development expenses of $231 million in the third quarter of 2004 remained relatively flat compared to $225 million in the second quarter of 2004 and increased eight percent compared to $214 million in the third quarter of 2003. The increase from the third quarter of 2003 was primarily due to our increased research and development activities associated with newer versions of our microprocessor products. Research and development expenses of $682 million in the first nine months of 2004 increased nine percent compared to $626 million in the first nine months of 2003, primarily due to an increase in research and development expenses as a result of the formation of Spansion LLC, increased research and development activities related to newer versions of our AMD Opteron and AMD Athlon 64 microprocessors and increased research and development activities associated with our personal connectivity solutions products.

From time to time, we also apply for and obtain subsidies from the State of Saxony and the Federal Republic of Germany for certain research and development projects. We record the research and development subsidies as a reduction of research and development expenses when all conditions and requirements set forth in the subsidy grant are met. The credits to research and development expenses totaled $8.7 million in the third quarter of 2004, $4.2 million in the second quarter of 2004 and $5.7 million in the third quarter of 2003. In the first nine months of 2004, credits totaled $18.2 million, and in the first nine months of 2003, credits totaled $15.8 million.

Marketing, general and administrative expenses of $202 million in the third quarter of 2004 increased 13 percent compared with $179 million in the second quarter of 2004. This increase was primarily due to corporate advertising and branding efforts, including for the AMD Athlon 64 and AMD Opteron brands, and the launch of our AMD Sempron microprocessor products. Marketing, general and administrative expenses of $202 million in the third quarter of 2004 increased 34 percent compared to $151 million in the third quarter of 2003. This increase was primarily due to marketing and branding efforts for our AMD Opteron and AMD Athlon 64 microprocessor products and the launch of our AMD Sempron microprocessor products in July 2004.

Marketing, general and administrative expenses of $561 million in the first nine months of 2004 increased 32 percent compared to $425 million in the first nine months of 2003. This increase was primarily due to an increase in expenses as a result of the formation of Spansion LLC and increased marketing and branding efforts for our AMD Opteron, AMD Athlon 64 and AMD Sempron microprocessor products.

Effects of Our 2002 Restructuring Plan

In December 2002, we began implementing the 2002 Restructuring Plan to further align our cost structure to the industry conditions at that time, including weak customer demand and industry-wide excess inventory. As a result of the 2002 Restructuring Plan, as of September 26, 2004, 1,785 employees had been terminated resulting in cumulative cash payments of approximately $60 million in severance and employee benefit costs.

With the exception of the facility exit costs consisting primarily of remaining lease payments on abandoned facilities, which are payable through 2011, net of estimated sublease income, we have substantially completed the activities associated with the 2002 Restructuring Plan. As a result of the 2002 Restructuring Plan, we realized overall cumulative cost reductions of approximately $283 million as of September 26, 2004.

The following table summarizes activities under the 2002 Restructuring Plan from December 28, 2003 through September 26, 2004:


	Severance and Employee Benefits			Exit and Equipment Decommission Costs			Total
	(in thousands)
Accruals at December 28, 2003	$	6,740		$	120,623		$	127,363
Q1 2004 cash payments		(4,664	)		(5,437	)		(10,101	)

Accruals at March 28, 2004		2,076			115,186			117,262
Q2 2004 cash payments		(1,481	)		(5,224	)		(6,705	)
Q2 2004 non-cash adjustments		253			2,261			2,514

Accruals at June 27, 2004		848			112,223			113,071
Q3 2004 cash payments		(330	)		(5,092	)		(5,422	)
Q3 2004 non-cash adjustments		(268	)		—			(268	)

Accruals at September 26, 2004	$	250		$	107,131		$	107,381

Interest Income and Other, Net

Interest income and other, net, of approximately $2.5 million in the third quarter of 2004 increased from a net expense of $2 million in the second quarter of 2004 primarily because of a loss of approximately $6 million during the second quarter of 2004 as a result of the mark-to-market of certain of our foreign currency forward contracts being used as economic hedges of forecasted capital contributions to AMD Fab 36 KG, our German limited liability partnership that owns Fab 36, which do not qualify as accounting hedges. Interest income and other, net, in the third quarter of 2004 increased from $0.5 million in the third quarter of 2003 primarily due to a $2 million charge in the third quarter of 2003 for other than temporary declines in our equity investments. Interest income and other, net, of $11 million in the first nine months of 2004 decreased from $12 million in the first nine months of 2003. While interest income in the first nine months of 2004 was relatively flat compared with the first nine months of 2003, the decrease was due to certain one-time other income and expenses items. Other income and expenses in the first nine months of 2004 included a gain of approximately $7 million from sales of equity investments in the first quarter of 2004, offset by a loss of approximately $6 million during the second quarter of 2004 as a result of the hedging loss referenced above. Other income and expenses in the first nine months of 2003 included a gain of approximately $3.7 million from sale of available-for-sale securities, offset by a $2 million charge in the third quarter of 2003 for other than temporary declines in our equity investments.

Interest Expense

Interest expense of $25 million in the third quarter of 2004 decreased from $28 million in the second quarter of 2004 primarily because we capitalized an additional $1.2 million of interest expense in connection with our Fab 36 project. Interest expense decreased from $27 million in the third quarter of 2003 primarily because we capitalized approximately $3 million of interest expense in connection with our Fab 36 project. Interest expense of $83 million in the first nine months 2004 increased from $79 million in the first nine months of 2003 primarily due to additional interest expense of approximately $9 million from new debt assumed by Spansion LLC and its subsidiaries after the formation of Spansion LLC, as well as debt consolidated on our financial statements incurred by FASL, the previous manufacturing joint venture between us and Fujitsu, prior to the formation of Spansion LLC, partially offset by approximately $4.5 million of interest expense relating to our Fab 36 project that we capitalized.

Income Taxes

We recorded an income tax provision of approximately $5 million in the third quarter of 2004 and $4 million in the second quarter of 2004. We recorded no income tax provision in the third quarter of 2003. The income tax provision recorded in the third and second quarters of 2004 was primarily for taxes due on income generated in certain foreign jurisdictions. The effective tax rates for the quarters ended September 26, 2004, June 27, 2004 and September 28, 2003 were ten percent, ten percent and zero percent. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 26, 2004 was approximately eight percent. The approximately $3 million income tax provision for the nine months ended September 28, 2003 was primarily for taxes due on income generated in certain state and foreign tax jurisdictions.

Other Items

International sales as a percent of net sales were 77 percent in the third quarter of 2004, 80 percent in the second quarter of 2004 and 81 percent in the third quarter of 2003. In the third quarter of 2003, sales to Latin America, constituting approximately two percent of total net sales, were originally reported as domestic sales and have been reclassified as international sales. During the third quarter of 2004, approximately 21 percent of our net sales were denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the Japanese yen, as compared to 28 percent during the second quarter of 2004 and 21 percent during the third quarter of 2003. Sales denominated in foreign currencies consist primarily of sales by Spansion Japan Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Spansion LLC, to Fujitsu which are denominated in yen.

As a result of our foreign operations, we have sales, costs, assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the European Union euro and the Japanese yen. For example:

•

a significant portion of our manufacturing costs for our microprocessor products is denominated in euros while sales of those products are denominated primarily in U.S. dollars;

•

certain of our fixed asset purchases are denominated in euros and yen;

•

sales of our Flash memory products in Japan are denominated in yen; and

•

a significant amount of costs of our Fab 36 project is denominated in euros.

As a consequence, movements in exchange rates could cause our U.S. dollar-denominated expenses to increase as a percentage of net sales, affecting our profitability and cash flows. We use foreign currency forward and option contracts to reduce our exposure to currency fluctuations on our foreign currency exposures. The objective of these contracts is to minimize the impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements on our operating results and on the cost of capital asset acquisitions. The impact on our operating results from changes in foreign currency rates individually and in the aggregate has not been material, principally as a result of our foreign currency hedging activities.

Financial Condition

Our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments at September 26, 2004 totaled $1.2 billion, which included approximately $284 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments held by Spansion LLC. Spansion LLC’s operating agreement governs its ability to use this cash balance for operations or to distribute it to us and Fujitsu. Pursuant to the operating agreement, and subject to restrictions contained in third-party loan agreements, Spansion LLC must first distribute any cash balance to us and Fujitsu in an amount sufficient to cover each party’s estimated tax liability, if any, related to Spansion LLC’s taxable income for each fiscal year. Any remaining cash balance after the tax liability distribution would be used by Spansion LLC to fund its operations in accordance with its budget. If any cash remains, it must be used to repay Spansion LLC’s outstanding debt to us and Fujitsu. Any remaining cash after these distributions is distributed at the discretion of Spansion LLC’s board of managers to us and Fujitsu, pro rata, based on each party’s membership interest at the time of distribution, which currently is 60 percent for AMD and 40 percent for Fujitsu. Our cash balance also

included a compensating balance of $215 million as of September 26, 2004, which represents the minimum cash balance that AMD Saxony was required to maintain pursuant to the terms of the Dresden Loan Agreements. As a result of the prepayment of the Dresden Term Loans on November 2, 2004, AMD Saxony is currently not required to maintain a minimum cash balance.

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities in the first nine months of 2004 was approximately $724 million. Our net income for the period was adjusted for non-cash charges, which were primarily depreciation and amortization. The net changes in payables and accrued liabilities in the first nine months of 2004 included refunds of customer deposits of $21 million under long-term purchase agreements and $39 million in royalty payments by us under a cross-license agreement. Accounts receivable increased in the first nine months of 2004 by approximately $236 million due to an increase of net sales of 62 percent in the first nine months of 2004 compared to net sales in the first nine months of 2003. In addition, inventories increased in the first nine months of 2004 by approximately $112 million in anticipation of increased seasonal demand for our microprocessor and Flash memory products during the remainder of 2004. Substantially all of the increase in inventories was related to Flash memory products based on 110-nanometer technology and AMD64-based processor products.

Net cash used in operating activities was $93 million in the first nine months of 2003. This was primarily caused by our year-to-date net loss of $318 million and approximately $436 million used for other operating activities due to net changes in operating assets and liabilities, described below, offset by non-cash charges, which included $708 million of depreciation and amortization, non-cash credits of $49 million from foreign grant and subsidy income, and $20 million of net loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment. The net changes in operating assets and liabilities included a payment of $90 million for a technology license from IBM, refunds of customer deposits of $27 million under long-term purchase agreements and approximately $35 million of severance payments under the 2002 Restructuring Plan.

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $1,012 million in the first nine months of 2004. Cash was used primarily to purchase short-term investments and property, plant and equipment, including $301 million for the continuing construction of Fab 36.

Net cash provided by investing activities was $291 million during the first nine months of 2003. This amount includes $148 million from the acquisition of a controlling interest in Spansion LLC and $530 million net cash from purchases and sales of available-for-sale securities, offset by $408 million used for the purchases of property, plant and equipment.

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $99 million in the first nine months of 2004, primarily from investments in AMD Fab 36 KG of $74 million of silent partnership contributions and $91 million of limited partnership contributions from the unaffiliated limited partners, amounts borrowed by our subsidiaries under short-term loans, proceeds from an equipment sale-leaseback transaction and sales of stock under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan and upon employee stock option exercises, partially offset by payments on debt and capital lease obligations.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $366 million during the first nine months of 2003, primarily from $245 million received from equipment sale-leaseback transactions, $40 million borrowed by Spansion LLC from Fujitsu as part of Spansion LLC transaction, $142 million of capital investment grants received from the German government for the Fab 30 project and $17 million of proceeds primarily from sales of stock under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan and upon employee stock option exercises, offset by $85 million in payments on debt and capital lease obligations.

Revolving Credit Facilities

AMD Revolving Credit Facility

Our revolving credit facility provides for a secured revolving line of credit of up to $100 million that expires in July 2007. We can borrow, subject to amounts set aside by the lenders, up to 85 percent of our eligible accounts receivable from OEMs and 50 percent of our eligible accounts receivable from distributors. As of September 26, 2004, no borrowings were outstanding under our revolving credit facility.

Pursuant to the terms of our revolving credit facility, we have to comply with, among other things, the following financial covenants if our net domestic cash (as defined in our revolving credit facility) declines below $125 million:

•

comply with restrictions on our ability to pay cash dividends on our common stock;

•

maintain an adjusted tangible net worth (as defined in our revolving credit facility) as follows:


Measurement Date	Amount
	(in billions)
Last day of each fiscal quarter in 2004	$	1.425
Last day of each fiscal quarter in 2005	$	1.85
Last day of each fiscal quarter thereafter	$	2.0

•

achieve EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) according to the following schedule:


Period	Amount
	(in millions)
Four fiscal quarters ending September 30, 2004	$	850
Four fiscal quarters ending December 31, 2004	$	950
Four fiscal quarters ending March 31, 2005 and on each fiscal quarter thereafter	$	1,050

As of September 26, 2004, net domestic cash, as defined, totaled $333 million and the preceding financial covenants were not applicable. Our obligations under our revolving credit facility are secured by all of our accounts receivable, inventory, general intangibles (excluding intellectual property) and the related proceeds, excluding Spansion LLC’s accounts receivable, inventory and general intangibles.

Spansion Japan Revolving Loan Agreement

In March 2004, Spansion Japan Limited entered into a revolving credit facility agreement with certain Japanese financial institutions in the aggregate amount of 15 billion yen (approximately $136 million as of September 26, 2004). The revolving facility consists of two tranches: tranche A in the aggregate amount of up to nine billion yen (approximately $81 million as of September 26, 2004) and tranche B in the aggregate amount of up to six billion yen (approximately $54 million as of September 26, 2004). Spansion Japan can draw under the facility until March 24, 2005. However, as described in more detail below, the total amount that Spansion Japan can draw is limited based on the value of Spansion Japan’s accounts receivable from Fujitsu, which are pledged as security to the lenders. As of September 26, 2004, there were no borrowings outstanding under this facility.

Amounts borrowed under tranche A bear interest at a rate of TIBOR plus 0.55 percent. Amounts borrowed under tranche B bear interest at a rate of TIBOR plus 1.2 percent. Spansion Japan must first fully draw under tranche A prior to drawing amounts under tranche B. Borrowings must be used for working capital purposes and must be repaid no later than April 24, 2005.

Pursuant to the terms of the revolving credit facility agreement, Spansion Japan is required to comply with the following financial covenants:

•

ensure that assets exceed liabilities as of the end of each fiscal year and each six-month (mid-year) period;

•

maintain an adjusted tangible net worth (as defined in the agreement) at an amount not less than 60 billion yen (approximately $542 million as of September 26, 2004) as of the last day of each fiscal quarter;

•

maintain total net income plus depreciation of $213 million as of the last day of fiscal year 2004; and

•

ensure that as of the last day of each of the third and fourth quarter of 2004, the ratio of (a) net income plus depreciation to (b) the sum of interest expenses plus the amount of scheduled debt repayments plus capital expenditures for its facilities located in Aizu-Wakamatsu, Japan, for such period, is not less than 120%.

As of September 26, 2004, Spansion Japan was in compliance with these financial covenants. As security for amounts outstanding under the revolving facility, Spansion Japan pledged its accounts receivable from Fujitsu. The accounts receivable are held in trust pursuant to the terms of a trust agreement. Under the trust agreement, Spansion Japan is required to maintain the value of its accounts receivable at specified thresholds (as defined by the trust agreement), based upon the amounts outstanding under tranche A and tranche B. In addition, the trustee collects payments from Fujitsu into a separate trust account and releases these amounts to Spansion Japan, subject to the calculated thresholds, upon instruction from the agent for the lenders. At any time when the accounts receivable balance in the trust account is less than the required thresholds, Spansion Japan is required to do one of the following to cure the shortfall:

•

provide additional cash to the trust; or

•

repay a specified portion of the outstanding loans.

Amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility may become automatically due and payable upon the occurrence of specified events with respect to Spansion Japan, including: filings or proceedings in bankruptcy, failure to pay any obligations under the revolving credit facility that have become due, failure to pay other third-party indebtedness where such debt exceeds 200 million yen (approximately $2 million as of September 26, 2004), or if the value of the accounts receivable from Fujitsu held in trust is below the required thresholds and such shortfall is not remedied within three business days. In addition, amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility may become automatically due and payable upon the occurrence of specified events with respect to Fujitsu including: filings or proceedings in bankruptcy, default by Fujitsu with respect to payments to Spansion Japan or other obligations under their purchase and sale agreement, default by Fujitsu with respect to other third-party indebtedness where such debt exceeds one billion yen (approximately $9 million as of September 26, 2004). As of September 26, 2004, the amount of accounts receivable held in the trust was approximately $176 million. Because most amounts under the Spansion Japan Revolving Loan are denominated in yen, the dollar amounts stated above are subject to change based on applicable exchange rates. We used the exchange rate as of September 26, 2004 of 110.625 yen to one U.S. dollar to translate the amounts denominated in yen into U.S. dollars.

Contractual Cash Obligations and Guarantees

The following table summarizes our total principal contractual cash obligations at September 26, 2004, and is supplemented by the discussion following the table. Amounts set forth for operating leases and unconditional purchase commitments include only those amounts that are not recorded on our consolidated balance sheets.


			Payments Due By Fiscal Period
	Total		2004		2005		2006		2007		2008		2009 and Beyond
	(in thousands)
4.75% Convertible Senior Debentures Due 2002	$	500,000		—		—		—		—		—	$	500,000
4.50% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2007⁽¹⁾		402,500		—		—		—		402,500		—		—
Dresden Term Loan⁽²⁾		618,685		—		331,438		287,247		—		—		—
July 2003 Spansion Term Loan		51,474		6,875		27,500		17,099		—		—		—
Spansion Japan Term Loan		130,169		10,847		43,390		43,390		32,542		—		—
Fujitsu Cash Note		40,000		—		10,000		30,000		—		—		—
AMD Penang Term Loan		6,705		380		1,518		1,518		1,518		1,518		253
Spansion China Short-Term Loan		13,384		—		13,384		—		—		—		—
Capital lease obligations		206,413		26,307		96,397		79,368		4,124		217		—
Other long-term liabilities		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Operating leases		390,056		17,956		62,885		51,535		39,832		37,586		180,262
Unconditional purchase commitments⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾		1,050,957		166,319		162,978		142,710		132,877		112,735		333,338

Total principal contractual cash obligations⁽⁵⁾⁽⁶⁾	$	3,410,343	$	228,684	$	749,490	$	652,867	$	613,393	$	152,056	$	1,013,853

(1)

On October 22, 2004, we exchanged $70 million of our 4.5% Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, for 10,550,000 shares of our common stock. On November 8, 2004, we exchanged $60 million of our 4.50% Notes for 8,748,612 shares of our common stock. On November 18, 2004, we exchanged $71 million of our 4.50% Notes for 10,092,649 shares of our common stock. For more information, see “Other Financial Matters—Section 3(a)(9) Exchange.”

(2)	On November 2, 2004, we used the net proceeds from our offering of 7.75% Notes, together with existing cash, to prepay the amount outstanding under the Dresden Term Loan plus accrued and unpaid interest. See “Other Financial Matters—Issuance of Senior Notes,” below.

(3)	Purchase orders for goods and services that are cancelable upon notice and without significant penalties are not included in the amounts above.

(4)	We have unconditional purchase commitments for goods and services where payments are based, in part, on volume or type of services we require. In those cases, we only included the minimum volume or purchase commitment in the table above.

(5)

We have not included in the table above the silent partnership contributions of the unaffiliated limited partners of AMD Fab 36 KG or our repurchase obligation with respect to such silent partnership contributions. As of September 26, 2004, AMD Fab 36 KG had received $74 million of silent partnership contributions. These contributions were recorded as long-term debt in our consolidated balance sheets. Assuming milestones are met by AMD Fab 36 KG, we expect to receive a total of up to $172 million of silent partnership contributions from the unaffiliated limited partners. With respect to each unaffiliated limited partner, AMD Fab 36 Holding and AMD Fab 36 Admin are obligated to repurchase such partner’s silent partner contribution in annual installments one year after the partner has contributed the full amount required under the partnership agreements. As of September 26, 2004, the unaffiliated limited partners had not contributed the full amount required under the partnership agreements, and therefore, the condition precedent to our repurchase obligations had not been met. For more information, see “Fab 36 Term Loan and Guarantee and Fab 36 Partnership Agreements.”

(6)

On October 29, 2004, we sold $600,000,000 of 7.75% Senior Notes. The 7.75% Notes mature on November 1, 2012. We have not included the contractual cash obligation for the 7.75% Notes in the table above because the transaction occurred after the end of the third quarter of 2004. See “Other Financial Matters—Issuance of Senior Notes,” below.

4.75% Convertible Senior Debentures Due 2022

On January 29, 2002, we issued $500 million of our 4.75% Convertible Senior Debentures Due 2022, or the 4.75% Debentures, in a private offering pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S of the Securities Act.

The interest rate payable on the 4.75% Debentures will reset on August 1, 2008, August 1, 2011 and August 1, 2016 to a rate equal to the interest rate payable 120 days prior to the reset dates on 5-year U.S. Treasury Notes, plus 43 basis points. The interest rate will not be less than 4.75 percent and will not exceed 6.75 percent. Holders have the right to require us to repurchase all or a portion of our 4.75% Debentures on February 1, 2009, February 1, 2012, and February 1, 2017. The holders of the 4.75% Debentures also have the ability to require us to repurchase the 4.75% Debentures in the event that we undergo specified fundamental changes, including a change of control. In each such case, the redemption or repurchase price would be 100 percent of the principal amount of the 4.75% Debentures plus accrued and unpaid interest. The 4.75% Debentures are convertible by the holders into our common stock at a conversion price of $23.38 per share at any time. At this conversion price, each $1,000 principal amount of the 4.75% Debentures will be convertible into approximately 43 shares of our common stock. Issuance costs incurred in the amount of approximately $14 million are amortized ratably, which approximates the effective interest method, over the term of the 4.75% Debentures, as interest expense.

Beginning on February 5, 2005, the 4.75% Debentures are redeemable by us for cash at our option at specified prices expressed as a percentage of the outstanding principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, provided that we may not redeem the 4.75% Debentures prior to February 5, 2006, unless the last reported sale price of our common stock is at least 130 percent of the then effective conversion price for at least 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending within five trading days of the date of the redemption notice.

The redemption prices for the specified periods are as follows:


Period	Price as a Percentage of Principal Amount
Beginning on February 5, 2005 through February 4, 2006	102.375	%
Beginning on February 5, 2006 through February 4, 2007	101.583	%
Beginning on February 5, 2007 through February 4, 2008	100.792	%
Beginning on February 5, 2008	100.000	%

We may elect to purchase or otherwise retire our 4.75% Debentures with cash, stock or other assets from time to time in open market or privately negotiated transactions, either directly or through intermediaries, or by tender offer when we believe that market conditions are favorable to do so. Such purchases may have a material effect on our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

4.50% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2007

On November 25, 2002, we sold $402.5 million of 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2007, or the 4.50% Notes, in a registered offering. Interest on the 4.50% Notes is payable semiannually in arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year, beginning June 1, 2003. Beginning on December 4, 2005, the 4.50% Notes are redeemable by us at our option for cash at specified prices expressed as a percentage of the outstanding principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest provided that we may not redeem the 4.50% Notes unless the last reported sale price of our common stock is at least 150 percent of the then effective conversion price for at least 20 trading days within a period of 30 trading days ending within five trading days of the date of the redemption notice.

The redemption prices for the specified periods are as follows:


Period	Price as a Percentage of Principal Amount
Beginning on December 4, 2005 through November 30, 2006	101.800	%
Beginning on December 1, 2006 through November 30, 2007	100.900	%
On December 1, 2007	100.000	%

The 4.50% Notes are convertible at the option of the holder at any time prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the maturity date of December 1, 2007, unless previously redeemed or repurchased, into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $7.37 per share, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. At this conversion price, each $1,000 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes will be convertible into approximately 135 shares of our common stock. Issuance costs incurred in the amount of approximately $12 million are amortized ratably, over the term of the 4.50% Notes, as interest expense, approximating the effective interest method.

Holders have the right to require us to repurchase all or a portion of our 4.50% Notes in the event that we undergo specified fundamental changes, including a change of control. In each such case, the redemption or repurchase price would be 100 percent of the principal amount of the 4.50% Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest.

On October 22, 2004, we exchanged $70 million of our 4.50% Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, for 10,550,000 shares of our common stock. On November 8, 2004, we exchanged $60 million of our 4.50% Notes for 8,748,612 shares of our common stock. On November 18, 2004, we exchanged $71 million of our 4.50% Notes for 10,092,649 shares of our common stock. For more information, see “Other Financial Matters—Section 3(a)(9) Exchange.”

We may elect to purchase or otherwise retire our 4.50% Notes with cash, stock or other assets from time to time in open market or privately negotiated transactions, either directly or through intermediaries, or by tender offer when we believe that market conditions are favorable to do so. Such purchases may have a material effect on our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

Dresden Term Loan and Dresden Inter-company Guarantee

AMD Saxony, our indirect, wholly owned German subsidiary, continues to facilitize Fab 30, which began production in the second quarter of 2000. AMD, the Federal Republic of Germany, the State of Saxony and a consortium of banks provided financing for the project. We estimate that the construction and facilitization costs of Fab 30 will be $2.5 billion when it is fully equipped by the end of 2005. As of September 26, 2004, we had invested approximately $2.3 billion in AMD Saxony.

In March 1997, AMD Saxony entered into a loan agreement and other related agreements (the Dresden Loan Agreements) with a consortium of banks led by Dresdner Bank AG, a German financial institution, in order to finance the project. AMD Saxony has pledged substantially all of its property as security under the Dresden Loan Agreements, we pledged our equity interests in our other wholly owned subsidiaries that are the limited partners and the general partner of AMD Saxony and these wholly owned subsidiaries pledged all of their partnership interests in AMD Saxony.

Because most of the amounts under the Dresden Loan Agreements are denominated in deutsche marks (converted to euros), the dollar amounts are subject to change based on applicable exchange rates. We used the exchange rate that was permanently fixed on January 1, 1999, of 1.95583 deutsche marks to one euro, for the conversion of deutsche marks to euros, and then used the exchange rate at September 26, 2004, of 0.815 euro to one U.S. dollar, to translate the amounts denominated in deutsche marks into U.S. dollars. However, with respect to amounts for investment grants and allowances and interest subsidies received by AMD Saxony through

September 26, 2004, we used historical exchange rates that were in effect at the time AMD Saxony received these grants, allowances and subsidies to convert amounts denominated in deutsche marks (converted to euros) into U.S. dollars.

The Dresden Loan Agreements, as amended, provide for the funding of the construction and facilitization of Fab 30. The funding consists of:

•

equity contributions, subordinated and revolving loans and loan guarantees from, and full cost reimbursement through, AMD;

•

loans from a consortium of banks; and

•

investment grants, investment allowances, interest subsidies, and loan guarantees from the Federal Republic of Germany and the State of Saxony.

The Dresden Loan Agreements require that we partially fund Fab 30 project costs in the form of subordinated and revolving loans to, or equity investments in, AMD Saxony. In accordance with the terms of the Dresden Loan Agreements, as of September 26, 2004, we had provided $178 million of subordinated loans and $286 million of equity investments in AMD Saxony. These amounts have been eliminated in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In addition to support from us, the consortium of banks referred to above made available $941 million in loans to AMD Saxony to help fund Fab 30 project costs. The loans have been fully drawn. AMD Saxony had $619 million of such loans outstanding as of September 26, 2004, which are included in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet. On November 2, 2004, AMD Saxony prepaid the full amount outstanding under the Dresden Term Loans plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Dresden Loan Agreements were terminated effective December 23, 2004. See “Other Financial Matters—Issuance of Senior Notes,” below.

Pursuant to a Subsidy Agreement, the Federal Republic of Germany and the State of Saxony are supporting the Fab 30 project, in accordance with the Dresden Loan Agreements, in the form of:

•

guarantees equal to 65 percent of AMD Saxony bank debt, which was approximately $402 million as of September 26, 2004;

•

capital investment grants and allowances totaling up to approximately $447 million as of September 26, 2004; and

•

interest subsidies totaling $188 million as of September 26, 2004.

Of these amounts, AMD Saxony received approximately $411 million in capital investment grants and allowances and $153 million in interest subsidies. AMD Saxony also received $56 million in research and development subsidies through September 26, 2004. Amounts received under the Subsidy Agreement are recorded as a long-term liability on our financial statements and are being amortized to operations ratably over the contractual life of the Subsidy Agreement as a reduction to operating expenses. As of September 26, 2004, these amounts were amortized through December 2007. AMD Saxony has received substantially all investment grants and allowances and interest subsidies to which it is entitled.

Under the original Subsidy Agreement for the construction and financing of Fab 30, AMD Saxony undertook to attain a certain employee headcount by December 2003 and to maintain such headcount until December 2008. Noncompliance with the conditions of the grants, allowances and subsidies contained in the Subsidy Agreement could result in the forfeiture of all or a portion of the future amounts to be received, as well as the repayment of all or a portion of amounts received to date. In December 2002, AMD Saxony reduced its anticipated employment levels as a result of the 2002 Restructuring Plan. Consequently, as of December 2003, headcount was below the level agreed to by AMD Saxony at which AMD Saxony would be entitled to receive the maximum amount of capital investment grants and allowances available. However, the aggregate amount of grants and allowances actually received by AMD Saxony to date, calculated as a percentage of the maximum amount of grants and allowances available, does not exceed the actual headcount at AMD Saxony at December 2003, calculated as a percentage of the headcount target undertaken in the Subsidy Agreement. Accordingly,

AMD Saxony does not believe it has received grants and allowances in excess of its entitlement under the Subsidy Agreement. However, we anticipate that the maximum amount of capital investment grants and allowances available under the Subsidy Agreement will be reduced from an originally anticipated amount of $511 million to approximately $447 million. We adjusted the quarterly amortization of these amounts accordingly.

In April 2004, the German governmental authorities advised AMD Saxony that rather than maintaining employee headcount attained by December 2003 through December 2008, it would be required to maintain employee headcount attained as of December 2002 through December 2007. Beginning in April 2004, we adjusted the quarterly amortization of the grants and allowances until December 2007. In addition, based on employee headcount attained as of December 2002, AMD Saxony does not believe that it has received grants and allowances in excess of its entitlement under the Subsidy Agreements.

Under the Dresden Loan Agreements, AMD Saxony and its limited partners are currently prevented from paying dividends or making other payments to us. In addition, the Dresden Loan Agreements, as amended, also require that we:

•

provide interim funding to AMD Saxony if either the remaining capital investment grants and allowances or the remaining interest subsidies are delayed, such funding to be repaid to AMD, as AMD Saxony receives the investment grants and allowances or subsidies from the State of Saxony and the Federal Republic of Germany;

•

fund shortfalls in government subsidies resulting from any default under the Subsidy Agreement caused by AMD Saxony or its affiliates; and

•

guarantee up to 50 percent of AMD Saxony’s obligations under the Dresden Loan Agreements, which guarantee must not be less than $137 million or more than $368 million, until the bank loans are repaid in full.

As of September 26, 2004, the amount guaranteed was $309 million. However, on November 2, 2004, AMD Saxony prepaid the full amount outstanding under the Dresden Term Loans plus accrued and unpaid interest and effective December 23, 2004, the Dresden Loan Agreements were terminated. See “Other Financial Matters—Issuance of Senior Notes,” below.

Fab 36 Term Loan and Guarantee and Fab 36 Partnership Agreements

We are facilitizing our new 300-millimeter wafer fabrication facility, Fab 36, in Dresden, Germany, adjacent to Fab 30. Fab 36 is owned by a German limited partnership named AMD Fab 36 Limited Liability Company & Co. KG, or AMD Fab 36 KG. We control the management of AMD Fab 36 KG through a wholly owned Delaware subsidiary, AMD Fab 36 LLC, which is a general partner of AMD Fab 36 KG. We expect that Fab 36 will produce future generations of our microprocessor products, and that it will be in volume production in 2006. AMD, Leipziger Messe GmbH, a nominee of the State of Saxony, Fab 36 Beteiligungs GmbH, an investment consortium arranged by M+W Zander Facility Engineering GmbH, the general contractor for the project, and a consortium of banks are providing financing for the project. We also anticipate receiving up to approximately $666 million in grants and allowances from federal and state German authorities for the project. We expect that capital expenditures for Fab 36 through 2007 will be approximately $2.5 billion in the aggregate.

The funding to construct and facilitize Fab 36 consists of:

•

contributions under the partnership agreements of up to approximately $718 million and revolving loans of up to approximately $920 million, a guarantee from, and full cost reimbursement through, AMD;

•

investments of up to approximately $393 million from the unaffiliated limited partners of AMD Fab 36 KG;

•

loans of up to approximately $859 million from a consortium of banks;

•

up to approximately $666 million of subsidies consisting of grants and allowances, from the Federal Republic of Germany and the State of Saxony; and

•

a loan guarantee from the Federal Republic of Germany and the State of Saxony of 80 percent of the losses sustained by the consortium of banks referenced above after the banks have foreclosed on all other security.

As of September 26, 2004 we had provided $209 million of equity in AMD Fab 36 KG and no loans were outstanding. These amounts have been eliminated in our consolidated financial statements.

On April 21, 2004, AMD, AMD Fab 36 KG, AMD Fab 36 LLC, AMD Fab 36 Holding GmbH, a German company and wholly owned subsidiary of AMD that owns substantially all of our limited partnership interest in AMD Fab 36 KG, and AMD Fab 36 Admin GmbH, a German company and wholly owned subsidiary of AMD Fab 36 Holding that owns the remainder of our limited partnership interest in AMD Fab 36 KG, (collectively referred to as the AMD companies) entered into a series of agreements (the partnership agreements) with the unaffiliated limited partners of AMD Fab 36 KG, Leipziger Messe and Fab 36 Beteiligungs, relating to the rights and obligations with respect to their limited partner and silent partner contributions in AMD Fab 36 KG. The partnership is established for an indefinite period of time. A partner may terminate its participation in the partnership by giving twelve months advance notice to the other partners. The termination becomes effective at the end of the year following the year during which the notice is given. However, other than for good cause, a partner’s termination will not be effective before December 31, 2015.

Also on April 21, 2004, AMD Fab 36 KG entered into a term loan agreement and other related agreements (the Fab 36 Loan Agreements) with a consortium of banks led by Dresdner Bank AG, a German financial institution, to finance the purchase of equipment and tools required to operate Fab 36. The consortium of banks agreed to make available up to $859 million in loans to AMD Fab 36 KG upon its achievement of specified milestones, including attainment of “technical completion” at Fab 36, which requires certification by the banks’ technical advisor that AMD Fab 36 KG has a wafer fabrication process suitable for high volume production of advanced microprocessors and has achieved specified levels of average wafer starts per week and average wafer yields, as well as cumulative capital expenditures of approximately $1.2 billion. We currently anticipate that AMD Fab 36 KG will attain these milestones and first be able to draw on the loans in 2006. The amounts outstanding under the Fab 36 Loan Agreements are repayable in quarterly installments commencing in September 2007 and terminating in March 2011.

AMD Fab 36 KG pledged substantially all of its current and future assets as security under the Fab 36 Loan Agreements, we pledged our equity interest in AMD Fab 36 Holding and AMD Fab 36 LLC, AMD Fab 36 Holding pledged its equity interest in AMD Fab 36 Admin and its partnership interest in AMD Fab 36 KG and AMD Fab 36 Admin and AMD Fab 36 LLC pledged all of their partnership interests in AMD Fab 36 KG. AMD guaranteed the obligations of AMD Fab 36 KG to the lenders under the Fab 36 Loan Agreements. This guarantee also guarantees repayment of grants and allowances by AMD Fab 36 KG, should such repayment be required pursuant to the terms of the subsidies provided by the federal and state German authorities. Pursuant to the terms of the guarantee, we have to comply with specified adjusted tangible net worth and EBITDA financial covenants if the sum of our and our subsidiaries’ cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, less the amount outstanding under any third-party revolving credit facility or term loan agreement with an original maturity date for amounts borrowed of up to one year (group consolidated cash), declines below the following amounts:


Amount (in thousands)	if Moody’s Rating is at least		if Standard & Poor’s Rating is at least
$500,000	B1 or lower	and	B+ or lower
425,000	Ba3	and	BB-
400,000	Ba2	and	BB
350,000	Ba1	and	BB+
300,000	Baa3 or better	and	BBB-or better

As of September 26, 2004, group consolidated cash was greater than $500 million, and therefore, the preceding financial covenants were not applicable.

Because most of the amounts under the Fab 36 Loan Agreements and the partnership agreements are denominated in euros, the U.S. dollar amounts are subject to change based on applicable exchange rates. We used the exchange rate at September 26, 2004, of 0.815 euro to one U.S. dollar, to translate the amounts denominated in euros into U.S. dollars. However, with respect to amounts for investment grants, allowances and subsidies received by Fab 36 through September 26, 2004, we used historical exchange rates that were in effect at the time Fab 36 received these grants, allowances and subsidies to convert amounts denominated in euros into U.S. dollars.

The partnership agreements set forth each limited partner’s aggregate capital contribution to AMD Fab 36 KG and the milestones for such contributions. Pursuant to the terms of the partnership agreements, AMD, through AMD Fab 36 Holding and AMD Fab 36 Admin, agreed to provide an aggregate of $718 million, Leipziger Messe agreed to provide an aggregate of $246 million and Fab 36 Beteiligungs agreed to provide an aggregate of $147 million. The capital contributions of Leipziger Messe and Fab 36 Beteiligungs are comprised of limited partnership contributions and silent partnership contributions. The unaffiliated partners’ contributions are due at various dates upon the achievement of milestones relating to the construction and operation of Fab 36.

The partnership agreements also specify that the unaffiliated partners receive a guaranteed rate of return of between 11 percent and 13 percent per annum of their total investment depending upon the monthly wafer output of Fab 36. We guaranteed these payments by AMD Fab 36 KG.

Pursuant to the terms of the partnership agreements and subject to the prior consent of the Federal Republic of Germany and the State of Saxony, AMD Fab 36 Holding and AMD Fab 36 Admin have a call option over the limited partnership interests held by Leipziger Messe and Fab 36 Beteiligungs, first exercisable three and one-half years after the relevant partner has completed the applicable capital contribution and every three years thereafter. Also, commencing five years after completion of the relevant partner’s capital contribution, Leipziger Messe and Fab 36 Beteiligungs each have the right to sell their limited partnership interest to third parties (other than competitors), subject to a right of first refusal held by AMD Fab 36 Holding and AMD Fab 36 Admin, or to put their limited partnership interest to AMD Fab 36 Holding and AMD Fab 36 Admin. The put option is thereafter exercisable every three years. Leipziger Messe and Fab 36 Beteiligungs also have a put option in the event they are outvoted at AMD Fab 36 KG partners’ meetings with respect to certain specified matters such as increases in the partners’ capital contributions beyond those required by the partnership agreements, investments significantly in excess of the business plan, or certain dispositions of the limited partnership interests of AMD Fab 36 Holding and AMD Fab 36 Admin. The purchase price under the put option is the partner’s capital account balance plus accumulated or accrued profits due to such limited partner. The purchase price under the call option is the same amount, plus a premium of $4.3 million to Leipziger Messe and $2.6 million to Fab 36 Beteiligungs. The right of first refusal price is the lower of the put option price or the price offered by the third party that triggered the right. We guaranteed the payments under the put options.

In addition, AMD Fab 36 Holding and AMD Fab 36 Admin are obligated to repurchase the silent partnership interest of Leipziger Messe’s and Fab 36 Beteiligungs’ contributions over time. Specifically, AMD Fab 36 Holding and AMD Fab 36 Admin are required to repurchase Leipziger Messe’s silent partnership interest of $98 million in annual 25 percent installments commencing one year after Leipziger Messe has completed its limited partnership and silent partnership contributions, and Fab 36 Beteiligungs’ silent partnership interest of $74 million in annual 20 percent installments commencing one year after Fab 36 Beteiligungs has completed its limited partnership and silent partnership contributions.

For accounting and financial reporting purposes under United States generally accepted accounting principles, we initially classified the silent partnership contributions as long-term debt, based on their fair value because of the mandatory redemption features described in the prior paragraph. Each accounting period, we increase the ultimate redemption value of the silent partnership contributions by the guaranteed rate of return of between 11 percent to 13 percent. We will treat this increase as interest expense.

The limited partnership contributions that AMD Fab 36 KG expects to receive from Leipziger Messe and Fab 36 Beteiligungs are subject to the put and call provisions referenced above. These contributions are not

mandatorily redeemable, but rather are subject to redemption outside of the control of AMD Fab 36 Holding and AMD Fab 36 Admin. Upon consolidation, we initially record these contributions as minority interest, based on their fair value. Each accounting period, we increase the ultimate redemption value of these contributions by the guaranteed rate of return of between 11 percent and 13 percent. We treat this increase as minority interest allocation. No separate accounting is required for the put and call options because they are not freestanding instruments and not considered derivatives under SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. However, in the event of exercise of the call option by the AMD Fab 36 Holding and AMD Fab 36 Admin, the call premium referenced above would be recorded as an additional minority interest allocation.

As of September 26, 2004, AMD Fab 36 KG received $74 million of silent partnership contributions and $91 million of limited partnership contributions from the unaffiliated limited partners. These contributions were recorded as long-term debt and minority interest, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

In addition to support from us and the consortium of banks referred to above, the Federal Republic of Germany and the State of Saxony have agreed to support the Fab 36 project in the form of:

•

a loan guarantee equal to 80 percent of the losses sustained by the consortium of banks referenced above after the banks have foreclosed on all other security; and

•

subsidies consisting of grants and allowances totaling up to approximately $666 million.

As of September 26, 2004, AMD Fab 36 KG received allowances of $5 million for investments made in 2003.

The Fab 36 Loan Agreements also require that we:

•

provide funding to AMD Fab 36 KG if cash shortfalls occur, including funding shortfalls in government subsidies resulting from any defaults caused by AMD Fab 36 KG or its affiliates; and

•

guarantee 100 percent of AMD Fab 36 KG’s obligations under the Fab 36 Loan Agreements until the bank loans are repaid in full.

Under the Fab 36 Loan Agreements, AMD Fab 36 KG and each of the affiliated limited partners are generally prevented from paying dividends or making other payments to us. In addition, AMD Fab 36 KG would be in default under the Fab 36 Loan Agreements if we or any of the AMD companies fail to comply with certain obligations thereunder or upon the occurrence of certain events and if, after the occurrence of the event, the lenders determine that their legal or risk position is adversely affected. Circumstances that could result in a default include:

•

failure of any limited partner to make contributions to AMD Fab 36 KG as required under the partnership agreements or our failure to provide loans to AMD Fab 36 KG as required under the Fab 36 Loan Agreements;

•

failure to pay any amount due under the Fab 36 Loan Agreements within five days of the due date;

•

occurrence of any event which the lenders reasonably believe has had or is likely to have a material adverse effect on the business, assets or condition of AMD Fab 36 KG or AMD or their ability to perform under the Fab 36 Loan Agreements;

•

filings or proceedings in bankruptcy or insolvency with respect to us, AMD Fab 36 KG or any limited partner;

•

occurrence of a change in control (as defined in the Fab 36 Loan Agreements) of AMD;

•

AMD Fab 36 KG’s noncompliance with certain affirmative and negative covenants, including restrictions on payment of profits, dividends or other distributions except in limited circumstances and restrictions on incurring additional indebtedness, disposing of assets and repaying subordinated debt; and

•

AMD Fab 36 KG’s noncompliance with certain financial covenants, including minimum tangible net worth, minimum interest cover ratio, loan to fixed asset value ratio and a minimum cash covenant.

In general, any default with respect to other indebtedness of AMD Fab 36 KG that results in recourse to AMD Fab 36 KG of more than $6 million or any default with respect to indebtedness made or guaranteed by AMD that results in recourse to us of more than $25 million, and that is not cured, would result in a cross-default under the Fab 36 Loan Agreements.

The occurrence of a default under the Fab 36 Loan Agreements would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of all amounts outstanding under the Fab 36 Loan Agreements. In addition, the occurrence of a default under these agreements could result in a cross-default under the indentures governing our 4.75% Debentures, 4.50% Notes and 7.75% Notes. We cannot assure you that we would be able to obtain the funds necessary to fulfill these obligations. Any such failure would have a material adverse effect on us.

July 2003 Spansion Term Loan and Guarantee

Under our July 2003 Spansion Term Loan, as amended, amounts borrowed bear interest at a variable rate of LIBOR plus four percent, which was 5.98 percent at September 26, 2004. Repayment occurs in equal, consecutive, quarterly principal and interest installments ending in September 2006. As of September 26, 2004, $51 million was outstanding under the July 2003 Spansion Term Loan, of which 60 percent is guaranteed by us and 40 percent is guaranteed by Fujitsu. Spansion LLC granted a security interest in certain property, plant and equipment as security under the July 2003 Spansion Term Loan. In addition, as security for our guarantee obligations, we granted a security interest in certain of our assets, including our accounts receivable, inventory, general intangibles (excluding intellectual property) and the related proceeds.

Pursuant to the terms of the July 2003 Spansion Term Loan, Spansion LLC is required to comply with the following financial covenants during an enhanced covenant period which occurs if either Spansion LLC’s net domestic cash balance (as defined in the July 2003 Spansion Term Loan) as of the last day of any fiscal quarter is below $60 million or if its net worldwide cash balance (as defined in the July 2003 Spansion Term Loan) as of the last day of any fiscal quarter is below $130 million:

•

maintain an adjusted tangible net worth (as defined in the July 2003 Spansion Term Loan) of not less than $850 million;

•

achieve EBITDA according to the following schedule:


Period	Amount
	(in millions)
For the four quarters ending December 2004	$	550
For the four quarters ending in 2005	$	640
For the four quarters ending in 2006	$	800

•

maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio (as defined in the July 2003 Spansion Term Loan) according to the following schedule:


Period		Ratio
Period ending December 2004		1.0 to 1.00
Full Fiscal Year 2005		1.0 to 1.00
Full Fiscal Year 2006		0.9 to 1.00

In addition, during an enhanced covenant period, Spansion LLC is restricted in its ability to pay cash dividends in respect of membership interests.

As of September 26, 2004, Spansion LLC’s net domestic cash balance was $80 million and its net worldwide cash balance was $284 million. Because Spansion LLC was not in an enhanced covenant period, the preceding financial covenants were not applicable.

Spansion Japan Term Loan and Guarantee

As a result of the Spansion LLC transaction, the third-party loans of the Manufacturing Joint Venture were refinanced from the proceeds of a term loan entered into between Spansion Japan, which owns the assets of the Manufacturing Joint Venture, and a Japanese financial institution. Under the agreement, the amounts borrowed bear an interest rate of TIBOR plus a spread that is determined by Fujitsu’s current debt rating and Spansion Japan’s non-consolidated net asset value as of the last day of its fiscal year. The interest rate was 0.98 percent as of September 26, 2004. Repayment occurs in equal, consecutive, quarterly principal installments ending in June 2007. As of September 26, 2004, $130 million was outstanding under this term loan agreement. Spansion Japan’s assets are pledged as security for its borrowings under this agreement. Also, Fujitsu has guaranteed 100 percent of the amounts outstanding under this facility. We agreed to reimburse Fujitsu 60 percent of any amount paid by Fujitsu under its guarantee of this loan. Pursuant to the terms of the Spansion Japan Term Loan, Spansion Japan is required to comply with the following financial covenants:

•

ensure that assets exceed liabilities as of the end of each fiscal year and each six-month period during such fiscal year;

•

maintain an adjusted tangible net worth (as defined in the loan agreement), as of the last day of each fiscal quarter, of not less than 60 billion yen (approximately $542 million based on the exchange rate as of September 26, 2004);

•

maintain total net income plus depreciation, as of the last day of each fiscal period, as follows:


Period	Amount
	(in millions)
Fiscal year 2004	$	207
Fiscal year 2005	$	191
Fiscal year 2006	$	176

•

ensure that as of the last day of any fiscal quarter, the ratio of (a) net income plus depreciation to (b) the sum of (i) interest expense for such period plus (ii) scheduled amortization of debt for borrowed money (as defined in the loan agreement) for such period, including lease rentals plus (iii) maintenance capital expenditures for Spansion Japan’s existing and after acquired real property and improvements at its manufacturing facilities located in Aizu-Wakamatsu, Japan, is not less than:


Period	Percentage
Third and fourth fiscal quarters of 2004	120	%
Fiscal year 2005	120	%
Fiscal year 2006	120	%

As of September 26, 2004, Spansion Japan was in compliance with these financial covenants.

Because most amounts under the Spansion Japan Term Loan are denominated in yen, the dollar amounts are subject to change based on applicable exchange rates. We used the exchange rate as of September 26, 2004 of 110.625 yen to one U.S. dollar to translate the amounts denominated in yen into U.S. dollars.

Fujitsu Cash Note

As a result of the Spansion LLC transaction, Fujitsu loaned $40 million to Spansion LLC pursuant to a promissory note. The note bears an interest rate of LIBOR plus four percent, which was 5.98 percent as of September 26, 2004, and has a term of three years. The note is repayable in four equal payments, including interest, on September 30, 2005, December 31, 2005, March 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006.

AMD Penang Term Loan

On January 29, 2004, our subsidiary in Malaysia, AMD Export Sdn. Bhd., or AMD Penang, entered into a term loan agreement with a local financial institution. Under the terms of the loan agreement, AMD Penang can

borrow up to 30 million Malaysian Ringgit (approximately $8 million as of September 26, 2004) in order to fund the purchase of equipment. The loan bears a fixed annual interest rate of 5.9 percent and is payable in equal, consecutive, monthly principal and interest installments through February 2009. The total amount outstanding as of September 26, 2004 was approximately $7 million.

Spansion China Loan

Spansion (China) Limited, Spansion LLC’s subsidiary in the People’s Republic of China, entered into two revolving loan agreements with a local financial institution. Under the terms of the revolving foreign exchange loan agreement, Spansion China can borrow in U.S. dollars up to an amount of $18 million. Under the terms of the revolving Renminbi (RMB) loan agreement, Spansion China can borrow up to RMB 120 million (approximately $14.5 million as of September 26, 2004). The interest rate on the U.S. dollar denominated loans is LIBOR plus one percent and the interest rate on the RMB denominated loans is fixed at 4.779 percent. The maximum term of each loan is 12 months from the date of each drawdown. As of September 26, 2004, the total amount outstanding under the U.S. dollar denominated loan was approximately $5.5 million and the amount outstanding under the RMB denominated portion was approximately $7.9 million.

Capital Lease Obligations

As of September 26, 2004, we had aggregate outstanding capital lease obligations of approximately $206 million. Obligations under these lease agreements are collateralized by the assets leased and are payable through 2008. Leased assets consist principally of machinery and equipment. We guaranteed approximately $104 million of Spansion LLC’s and its subsidiaries’ aggregate outstanding capital lease obligations as of September 26, 2004.

Other Long-Term Liabilities

The only component of Other Long-Term Liabilities that requires us to make cash payments is a net restructuring accrual of approximately $89 million relating to the net future operating lease payments on certain facilities that were included in our 2002 Restructuring Plan. We will make these payments through 2011. We included these amounts in the operating lease total in the table above. The other components of Other Long-Term Liabilities primarily consist of approximately $185 million of deferred subsidies related to the Fab 30 project, approximately $28 million of deferred subsidies related to the Fab 36 project and a $22 million deferred gain as a result of the sale and leaseback of our corporate marketing, general and administrative facility in Sunnyvale, California in 1998. These components do not require us to make cash payments.

Operating Leases

We lease certain of our facilities, including our executive offices in Sunnyvale, California, under lease agreements that expire at various dates through 2018. We lease certain of our manufacturing and office equipment for terms ranging from one to five years. Total future lease obligations as of September 26, 2004, were approximately $390 million, of which $113 million was recorded as a liability for certain facilities that were included in our 2002 Restructuring Plan.

Unconditional Purchase Commitments

Total non-cancelable purchase commitments as of September 26, 2004, were approximately $1,051 million for periods through 2020. These purchase commitments included approximately $169 million to M+W Zander for the design and construction of Fab 36. These payments will be made to M+W Zander as services are performed. Our non-cancelable purchase commitments also included $260 million representing future payments to IBM in connection with joint development projects pursuant to the joint development agreement. As IBM’s services are being performed ratably over the life of the agreement, we expense the payments as incurred. Purchase commitments also included approximately $67 million for software maintenance agreements that

require periodic payments through 2007. As a result, we have not recorded any liabilities relating to these agreements. The remaining $565 million primarily consists of non-cancelable contractual obligations to purchase raw materials, natural resources and office supplies, including approximately $444 million related to contractual obligations to purchase energy and gas for Fab 36 through 2020. Purchase orders for goods and services that are cancelable without significant penalties are not included in the amounts above.

Guarantees

Guarantees of Indebtedness Recorded on Our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet

The following table summarizes the principal guarantees issued as of September 26, 2004 related to underlying liabilities that are already recorded on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 26, 2004 and their expected expiration dates by year. No incremental liabilities are recorded on our unaudited consolidated balance sheet for these guarantees. For more information on these guarantees, see “Contractual Cash Obligations and Guarantees,” above.


	Amounts Guaranteed⁽¹⁾		Amounts of Guarantee Expiration per Period
	Amounts Guaranteed⁽¹⁾		2004		2005		2006		2007		2008	2009 and Beyond
	(in thousands)
Dresden inter-company guarantee⁽²⁾	$	309,343		—	$	165,719	$	143,624		—	—	—
July 2003 Spansion term loan guarantee		30,885		4,126		16,500		10,259		—	—	—
Spansion Japan term loan guarantee		78,101		6,508		26,034		26,034		19,525	—	—
Spansion capital lease guarantees		104,273		12,721		45,066		43,215		3,271	—	—

Total guarantees⁽³⁾	$	522,602	$	23,355	$	253,319	$	223,132	$	22,796	—	—

(1)	Amounts represent the principal amount of the underlying obligations guaranteed and are exclusive of obligations for interest, fees and expenses.

(2)	On November 2, 2004, we used the net proceeds from the offering of 7.75% Notes, together with existing cash, to prepay the amount outstanding under the Dresden Term Loan plus accrued and unpaid interest.

(3)

We have not included in the table above our guarantees with respect to the obligations of AMD Fab 36, AMD Fab 36 Holding or AMD Fab 36 Admin under the Fab 36 Loan Agreements and the partnership agreements. As of September 26, 2004, no amounts were outstanding under the Fab 36 Loan Agreements and AMD Fab 36 KG had received $74 million of silent partnership contributions and $91 million of limited partnership contributions from its unaffiliated limited partners. Assuming milestones are met, by AMD Fab 36 KG, we expect to receive a total $172 million of silent partnership contributions and $221 million of limited partnership contributions from the unaffiliated limited partners. With respect to each unaffiliated limited partner, AMD Fab 36 Holding and AMD Fab 36 Admin are obligated to repurchase such partner’s silent partnership contribution in annual installments commencing one year after the partner has contributed the full amount required under the partnership agreements. We guaranteed these repurchase obligations. However, as of September 26, 2004, the unaffiliated limited partners had not contributed the full amount required under the partnership agreements, and therefore, the condition precedent to our repurchase obligations had not been met. See “Fab 36 Term Loan and Guarantee and Fab 36 Partnership Agreements,” above.

Guarantees of Indebtedness not Recorded on Our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet

The following table summarizes the principal guarantees issued as of September 26, 2004 for which the related underlying liabilities are not recorded on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 26, 2004 and their expected expiration dates. We have not recorded any liability in our consolidated financial statements associated with the guarantees because they were issued prior to December 31, 2002, the effective date of FIN 45.


	Amounts Guaranteed⁽¹⁾		Amounts of Guarantee Expiration per Period
	Amounts Guaranteed⁽¹⁾		2004		2005		2006		2007		2008	2009 and Beyond
	(in thousands)
Spansion LLC operating lease guarantees	$	18,474	$	2,767	$	9,506	$	6,201		—	—		—
AMTC revolving loan guarantee		39,282		—		—		—		39,282	—		—
AMTC rental guarantee⁽²⁾