UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 Commission File Number: 1-6622
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
MARYLAND | 53-0261100 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
6110 EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD, SUITE 800, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND | 20852 | |
(Address of principal executive office) | (Zip code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code (301) 984-9400
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve (12) months (or such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such report) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety (90) days. YES x NO ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer or smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). (Check One):
Large Accelerated Filer x Accelerated Filer ¨ Non-Accelerated Filer ¨ Smaller Reporting Company ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES ¨ NO x
Number of shares outstanding of common stock, as of August 7, 2008: 49,467,772
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
INDEX
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The information furnished in the accompanying unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets, Statements of Income, Statements of Cash Flows and Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. The accompanying financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes for the three years ended December 31, 2007 included in the Trusts 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
2
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited) June 30, 2008 |
December 31, 2007 |
|||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Land |
$ | 337,680 | $ | 328,951 | ||||
Income producing property |
1,693,384 | 1,635,169 | ||||||
2,031,064 | 1,964,120 | |||||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(368,200 | ) | (331,991 | ) | ||||
Net income producing property |
1,662,864 | 1,632,129 | ||||||
Development in progress |
58,760 | 98,321 | ||||||
Total real estate held for investment, net |
1,721,624 | 1,730,450 | ||||||
Investment in real estate held for sale, net |
| 23,843 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
12,724 | 21,488 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
48,868 | 6,030 | ||||||
Rents and other receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $5,585 and $4,227, respectively |
37,096 | 36,595 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
85,129 | 78,517 | ||||||
Other assets related to properties held for sale |
| 1,403 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,905,441 | $ | 1,898,326 | ||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Notes payable |
$ | 918,834 | $ | 879,123 | ||||
Mortgage notes payable |
331,575 | 252,484 | ||||||
Lines of credit |
15,000 | 192,500 | ||||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
59,193 | 63,543 | ||||||
Advance rents |
8,793 | 9,552 | ||||||
Tenant security deposits |
10,436 | 10,487 | ||||||
Other liabilities related to properties held for sale |
| 317 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
1,343,831 | 1,408,006 | ||||||
Minority interest |
3,791 | 3,776 | ||||||
Shareholders equity |
||||||||
Shares of beneficial interest; $0.01 par value; 100,000 shares authorized: 49,461 and 46,682 shares issued and outstanding |
496 | 468 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
653,816 | 561,492 | ||||||
Distributions in excess of net income |
(96,873 | ) | (75,416 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
380 | | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
557,819 | 486,544 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 1,905,441 | $ | 1,898,326 | ||||
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
3
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Revenue |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate rental revenue |
$ | 69,768 | $ | 63,255 | $ | 140,046 | $ | 123,107 | ||||||||
Expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate expenses |
22,803 | 19,542 | 45,936 | 38,248 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
21,198 | 16,632 | 41,723 | 32,758 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
3,111 | 5,367 | 6,191 | 8,250 | ||||||||||||
47,112 | 41,541 | 93,850 | 79,256 | |||||||||||||
Real estate operating income |
22,656 | 21,714 | 46,196 | 43,851 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(17,582 | ) | (15,298 | ) | (35,246 | ) | (29,682 | ) | ||||||||
Other income |
220 | 420 | 458 | 1,038 | ||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| | (8,449 | ) | | |||||||||||
Other income from life insurance proceeds |
| | | 1,303 | ||||||||||||
(17,362 | ) | (14,878 | ) | (43,237 | ) | (27,341 | ) | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
5,294 | 6,836 | 2,959 | 16,510 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate |
15,275 | | 15,275 | | ||||||||||||
Income from operations of properties held for sale |
639 | 1,501 | 1,486 | 2,539 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 21,208 | $ | 8,337 | $ | 19,720 | $ | 19,049 | ||||||||
Basic net income per share |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 0.11 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.37 | ||||||||
Discontinued operations |
0.33 | 0.03 | 0.36 | 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Basic net income per share |
$ | 0.44 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.42 | ||||||||
Diluted net income per share |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 0.11 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.36 | ||||||||
Discontinued operations |
0.33 | 0.03 | 0.36 | 0.06 | ||||||||||||
Diluted net income per share |
$ | 0.44 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.42 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
47,933 | 45,490 | 47,278 | 45,212 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
48,148 | 45,658 | 47,495 | 45,407 | ||||||||||||
Dividends declared and paid per share |
$ | 0.4325 | $ | 0.4225 | $ | 0.8550 | $ | 0.8350 |
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
4
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands)
(UNAUDITED)
Shares | Shares of Beneficial Interest at Par Value |
Additional Paid in Capital |
Distributions In Excess of Net Income |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
Shareholders Equity |
||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
46,682 | $ | 468 | $ | 561,492 | $ | (75,416 | ) | $ | | $ | 486,544 | |||||||
Comprehensive income: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 19,720 | 19,720 | ||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of interest rate hedge |
380 | 380 | |||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
20,100 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends |
| | | (41,177 | ) | (41,177 | ) | ||||||||||||
Equity offering |
2,600 | 26 | 86,657 | 86,683 | |||||||||||||||
Shares issued under Dividend Reinvestment Program |
80 | 1 | 2,559 | | 2,560 | ||||||||||||||
Share options exercised |
99 | 1 | 2,136 | | 2,137 | ||||||||||||||
Share grants, net of share grant amortization and forfeitures |
| | 972 | | 972 | ||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2008 |
49,461 | $ | 496 | $ | 653,816 | $ | (96,873 | ) | $ | 380 | $ | 557,819 | |||||||
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
5
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(UNAUDITED)
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 19,720 | $ | 19,049 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization, including amounts in discontinued operations |
41,723 | 33,655 | ||||||
Provision for losses on accounts receivable |
1,679 | 948 | ||||||
Amortization of share grants |
1,031 | 1,598 | ||||||
Gain on sale of real estate |
(15,275 | ) | | |||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
8,449 | | ||||||
Changes in operating other assets |
(2,182 | ) | (3,500 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating other liabilities |
3,314 | 14,406 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
58,459 | 66,156 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||
Real estate acquisitions, net |
(16,842 | ) | (200,123 | ) | ||||
Net cash received for sale of real estate |
40,231 | | ||||||
Restricted cash tax free exchange escrow |
(40,231 | ) | | |||||
Capital improvements to real estate |
(18,016 | ) | (20,341 | ) | ||||
Development in progress |
(13,556 | ) | (34,359 | ) | ||||
Non-real estate capital improvements |
(224 | ) | (2,359 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(48,638 | ) | (257,182 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||
Line of credit borrowings |
| 161,200 | ||||||
Line of credit repayments |
(177,500 | ) | (126,700 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid |
(41,177 | ) | (38,402 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from equity offering under Dividend Reinvestment Program |
2,560 | | ||||||
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable |
81,029 | | ||||||
Principal payments mortgage notes payable |
(1,938 | ) | (9,548 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from debt offering |
100,076 | 150,809 | ||||||
Financing costs |
(1,640 | ) | (4,887 | ) | ||||
Net proceeds from equity offering |
86,683 | 57,790 | ||||||
Note repayments |
(60,366 | ) | | |||||
Loss on extinguishment |
(8,449 | ) | | |||||
Net proceeds from the exercise of share options |
2,137 | 176 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(18,585 | ) | 190,438 | |||||
Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(8,764 | ) | (588 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
21,488 | 8,721 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 12,724 | $ | 8,133 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized |
$ | 35,248 | $ | 26,765 | ||||
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
6
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1: NATURE OF BUSINESS
Washington Real Estate Investment Trust (WRIT, the Company or the Trust), a Maryland Real Estate Investment Trust, is a self-administered, self-managed equity real estate investment trust, successor to a trust organized in 1960. Our business consists of the ownership and development of income-producing real estate properties in the greater Washington metro region. We own a diversified portfolio of office buildings, medical office buildings, industrial/flex centers, multifamily properties and retail centers.
Federal Income Taxes
We believe that we qualify as a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code and intend to continue to qualify as such. To maintain our status as a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our ordinary taxable income to our shareholders. When selling properties, we have the option of (i) reinvesting the sale price of properties sold, allowing for a deferral of income taxes on the sale, (ii) paying out capital gains to the shareholders with no tax to the company or (iii) treating the capital gains as having been distributed to the shareholders, paying the tax on the gain deemed distributed and allocating the tax paid as a credit to the shareholders. In June 2008, two industrial properties, Sullyfield Center and The Earhart Building, were sold for a gain of $15.3 million. The proceeds from the sale are expected to be reinvested in a replacement property.
NOTE 2: ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In addition, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Within these notes to the financial statements, we refer to the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 as the 2008 Quarter and the 2008 Period, respectively, and the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 as the 2007 Quarter and the 2007 Period, respectively.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. On February 12, 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (the FSP). The FSP amends SFAS No. 157 to delay the effective date for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (i.e. at least annually). The FSP defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years for items within the scope of the proposed FSP. The effective date of the statement related to those items not covered by the deferral (all financial assets and liabilities or non-financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis) is for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We do not have significant assets or liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, and therefore the adoption of this statement on January 1, 2008 did not have a material impact on our financial statements. However, this statement requires us to provide expanded disclosures of our valuation techniques.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates and report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We have not elected the fair value option for any assets or liabilities, and therefore the adoption of the statement did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
7
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations, a revision of SFAS No. 141. This statement changes the accounting for acquisitions by specifically eliminating the step acquisition model, changing the recognition of contingent consideration from being recognized when it is probable to being recognized at the time of acquisition, disallowing the capitalization of transaction costs, and delaying when restructuring related to acquisitions can be recognized. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and will only impact the accounting for acquisitions we make after our adoption. Accordingly, upon our adoption of this standard on January 1, 2009, there will not be any impact on our historical financial statements.
Also in December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, which clarifies the classification of noncontrolling interests in consolidated statements of financial position and the accounting for and reporting of transactions between the reporting entity and holders of such noncontrolling interests. Under the new standard noncontrolling interests are considered equity and should be reported as an element of consolidated equity. Net income will encompass the total income of all consolidated subsidiaries and there will be a separate disclosure on the face of the income statement of the attribution of that income between the controlling and noncontrolling interests. Increases and decreases in the noncontrolling ownership interest amount will be accounted for as equity transactions. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The statement will require us to change the presentation only of minority interest on our financial statements.
In March 2008 the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (FAS 161). This statement requires entities to provide greater transparency about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. To meet these objectives, FAS 161 requires (1) qualitative disclosures about objectives for using derivatives by primary underlying risk exposure and by purpose or strategy, (2) information about the volume of derivative activity, (3) tabular disclosures about balance sheet location and gross fair value amounts of derivative instruments, income statement and other comprehensive income location and amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments by type of contract, and (4) disclosures about credit risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. FAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. This statement will require us to provide expanded disclosures only of our interest rate hedge contract.
On May 9, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position APB 14-a (the FSP). This guidance clarifies the accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash (including partial cash settlement) upon conversion. This guidance will significantly impact the accounting of the Companys convertible debt by requiring bifurcation of a component of the debt, classification of that component in stockholders equity, and then accretion of the resulting discount on the debt to result in interest expense equal to the issuers nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. The calculation of earnings-per-share will not be affected, other than the impact on net income from the debt discount amortization. The FSP will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We believe that the adoption of the proposed FSP will have a significant impact on our financial statements due to our convertible debt outstanding and are in the process of quantifying the impact.
Revenue Recognition
Residential properties (our multifamily segment) are leased under operating leases with terms of generally one year or less, and commercial properties (our office, medical office, retail and industrial segments) are leased under operating leases with average terms of three to seven years. We recognize rental income and rental abatements from our residential and commercial leases when earned on a straight-line basis in accordance with SFAS No. 13 Accounting for Leases. Recognition of rental income commences when control of the facility has been given to the tenant. We record a provision for losses on accounts receivable equal to the estimated uncollectible amounts. This estimate is based on our historical experience and a review of the current status of the Companys receivables. Percentage rents, which represent additional rents based on gross tenant sales, are recognized when tenants sales exceed specified thresholds.
In accordance with SFAS No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, sales are recognized at closing only when sufficient down payments have been obtained, possession and other attributes of ownership have been transferred to the buyer and we have no significant continuing involvement.
8
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
We recognize cost reimbursement income from pass-through expenses on an accrual basis over the periods in which the expenses were incurred. Pass-through expenses are comprised of real estate taxes, operating expenses and common area maintenance costs which are reimbursed by tenants in accordance with specific allowable costs per tenant lease agreements.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable primarily represents amounts accrued and unpaid from tenants in accordance with the terms of the respective leases, subject to our revenue recognition policy. Receivables are reviewed monthly and reserves are established when, in the opinion of management, collection of the receivable is doubtful. When the collection of a receivable is deemed doubtful in the same quarter that the receivable was established, then the allowance for that receivable is recognized as an offset to real estate revenues. When a receivable that was initially established in a prior quarter is deemed doubtful, then the allowance is recognized as an operating expense. In addition to rents due currently, accounts receivable include amounts representing minimal rental income accrued on a straight-line basis to be paid by tenants over the remaining term of their respective leases. Reserves are established for tenants whose rent payment history or financial condition casts doubt upon the tenants ability to perform under its lease obligation.
Minority Interest
We entered into an operating agreement with a member of the entity that previously owned Northern Virginia Industrial Park in conjunction with the acquisition of this property in May 1998. This resulted in a minority ownership interest in this property based upon defined company ownership units at the date of purchase. The operating agreement was amended and restated in 2002 resulting in a reduced minority ownership percentage interest. We account for this activity by recording minority interest expense by applying the minority owners percentage ownership interest to the net income of the property and including such amount in our general and administrative expenses, thereby reducing net income.
In August 2007 we acquired a 0.8 acre parcel of land located at 4661 Kenmore Avenue, Alexandria, Virginia for future medical office development. The acquisition was funded by issuing operating units in a consolidated subsidiary of WRIT. This resulted in a minority ownership interest in this property based upon defined company ownership units at the date of purchase. We account for this activity by recording minority interest expense by applying the minority owners percentage ownership interest to the net income of the property and including such amount in our general and administrative expenses, thereby reducing net income.
Minority interest expense was $52,800 and $110,200 for the 2008 Quarter and 2008 Period, respectively, and $52,900 and $105,200 for the 2007 Quarter and 2007 Period, respectively. Quarterly distributions are made to the minority owners equal to the quarterly dividend per share for each ownership unit.
Deferred Financing Costs
External costs associated with the issuance or assumption of mortgages, notes payable and fees associated with the lines of credit are capitalized and amortized using the effective interest rate method or the straight-line method which approximates the effective interest rate method over the term of the related debt. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, deferred financing costs of $21.4 million and $23.9 million, respectively, net of accumulated amortization of $5.0 million and $7.9 million, were included in Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets on the balance sheets. The amortization is included in Interest Expense in the accompanying statements of income. The amortization of debt costs included in Interest Expense totaled $0.6 million and $1.3 million for the 2008 Quarter and 2008 Period, respectively, and $0.6 million and $1.1 million for the 2007 Quarter and the 2007 Period, respectively.
Deferred Leasing Costs
Costs associated with the successful negotiation of leases, both external commissions and internal direct costs, are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. If an applicable lease terminates prior to the expiration of its initial lease term, the carrying amount of the costs are written-off to amortization expense. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 deferred leasing costs of $26.1 million and $23.8 million, respectively, net of accumulated amortization of $9.3 million and $8.3 million, were included in Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets on the balance sheets. The amortization of deferred leasing costs included in Amortization Expense for properties classified as continuing operations totaled $0.8 million and $1.7 million for the 2008 Quarter and the 2008 Period, respectively, and $0.7 million and $1.5 million for the 2007 Quarter and the 2007 Period, respectively.
9
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
Real Estate and Depreciation
Buildings are depreciated on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives ranging from 28 to 50 years. All capital improvement expenditures associated with replacements, improvements, or major repairs to real property that extend its useful life are capitalized and depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 30 years. We also capitalize costs incurred in connection with our development projects, including capitalizing interest and other internal costs during periods in which development projects are in progress. In addition, we capitalize tenant leasehold improvements when certain criteria are met, including when we supervise construction and will own the improvements. All tenant improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the improvements or the term of the related tenant lease. Real estate depreciation expense from continuing operations was $17.2 million and $34.0 million for the 2008 Quarter and Period, respectively, and $13.6 million and $26.1 million for the 2007 Quarter and Period, respectively. Maintenance and repair costs that do not extend an assets life are charged to expense as incurred.
We capitalize interest costs incurred on borrowing obligations while qualifying assets are being readied for their intended use in accordance with SFAS No. 34, Capitalization of Interest Cost. Total interest expense capitalized to real estate assets related to development and major renovation activities was $0.7 million and $1.4 million for the 2008 Quarter and Period, respectively, and $1.6 million and $2.9 million for the 2007 Quarter and Period, respectively. Interest capitalized is amortized over the useful life of the related underlying assets upon those assets being placed into service.
We recognize impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations and held for sale, development assets or land held for future development, if indicators of impairment are present and the net undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets carrying amount and estimated undiscounted cash flows associated with future development expenditures. If such carrying amount is in excess of the estimated cash flows from the operation and disposal of the property, we would recognize an impairment loss equivalent to an amount required to adjust the carrying amount to the estimated fair value. There were no property impairments recognized during 2008 and 2007 Quarters and 2008 and 2007 Periods.
We allocate the purchase price of acquired properties to the related physical assets and in-place leases based on their fair values, in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. The fair values of acquired buildings are determined on an as-if-vacant basis considering a variety of factors, including the physical condition and quality of the buildings, estimated rental and absorption rates, estimated future cash flows and valuation assumptions consistent with current market conditions. The as-if-vacant fair value is allocated to land, building and tenant improvements based on property tax assessments and other relevant information obtained in connection with the acquisition of the property. No goodwill was recorded on our acquisitions for the 2008 and 2007 Quarters and 2008 and 2007 Periods.
The fair value of in-place leases consists of the following components (1) the estimated cost to us to replace the leases, including foregone rents during the period of finding a new tenant and foregone recovery of tenant pass-throughs (referred to as Absorption Cost), (2) the estimated cost of tenant improvements, and other direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant (referred to as Tenant Origination Cost); (3) estimated leasing commissions associated with obtaining a new tenant (referred to as Leasing Commissions); (4) the above/below market cash flow of the leases, determined by comparing the projected cash flows of the leases in place to projected cash flows of comparable market-rate leases (referred to as Net Lease Intangible); and (5) the value, if any, of customer relationships, determined based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenants lease and our overall relationship with the tenant (referred to as Customer Relationship Value).
The amounts used to calculate Net Lease Intangible are discounted using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired. Tenant Origination Costs are included in Real Estate Assets on our balance sheet and are amortized as depreciation expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the underlying leases. Leasing Commissions and Absorption Costs are classified as Other Assets and are amortized as amortization expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the underlying leases. Net Lease Intangible Assets are classified as Other Assets and are amortized on a straight-line basis as a decrease to Real Estate Rental Revenue over the remaining term of the underlying leases. Net Lease Intangible Liabilities are classified as Other Liabilities and are amortized on a straight-line basis as an increase to Real Estate Rental Revenue over the remaining term of the underlying leases. Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the Tenant Origination Cost, Leasing Commissions, Absorption Costs and Net Lease Intangible associated with that lease are written off to depreciation expense, amortization expense, and rental revenue, respectively.
10
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
Balances, net of accumulated depreciation or amortization, as appropriate, of the components of the fair value of in-place leases at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are as follows (in millions):
June 30, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||
Gross Carrying Value |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net | Gross Carrying Value |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net | |||||||||||||
Tenant Origination Costs |
$ | 31.3 | $ | 13.5 | $ | 17.8 | $ | 31.3 | $ | 10.9 | $ | 20.4 | ||||||
Leasing Commissions/Absorption Costs |
$ | 34.1 | $ | 12.0 | $ | 22.1 | $ | 33.8 | $ | 8.8 | $ | 25.0 | ||||||
Net Lease Intangible Assets |
$ | 8.8 | $ | 5.0 | $ | 3.8 | $ | 8.9 | $ | 4.3 | $ | 4.6 | ||||||
Net Lease Intangible Liabilities |
$ | 22.8 | $ | 8.2 | $ | 14.6 | $ | 23.5 | $ | 6.3 | $ | 17.2 |
Amortization of these components combined was $2.5 million and $4.7 million for the 2008 Quarter and Period, respectively, and $2.0 million and $4.2 million for the 2007 Quarter and Period, respectively. In addition, we have a below-market ground lease intangible asset from a 2007 acquisition with a gross carrying value of $12.1 million as of June 30, 2008. No value had been assigned to Customer Relationship Value at June 30, 2008 or December 31, 2007.
Discontinued Operations
We classify properties as held for sale when they meet the necessary criteria specified by SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets and EITF 03-13, Applying the Conditions in Paragraph 42 of FASB Statement No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, in Determining Whether to Report Discontinued Operations. These include: senior management commits to and actively embarks upon a plan to sell the assets, the sale is expected to be completed within one year under terms usual and customary for such sales and actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. Depreciation on these properties is discontinued, but operating revenues, operating expenses and interest expense continue to be recognized until the date of sale.
Under SFAS No. 144, revenues and expenses of properties that are either sold or classified as held for sale are presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented in the Statements of Income. Interest on debt that can be identified as specifically attributed to these properties is included in discontinued operations. We do not have significant continuing involvement in the operations of any of our disposed properties.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include investments readily convertible to known amounts of cash with original maturities of 90 days or less.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 consisted of $48.9 million and $6.0 million, respectively, in funds escrowed for tenant security deposits for certain tenants, real estate tax, insurance and mortgage escrows and escrow deposits required by lenders on certain of our properties to be used for future building renovations or tenant improvements. The balance at June 30, 2008 includes proceeds from the sale of real estate of $40.2 million escrowed in a tax free property exchange account (see Note 3).
11
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
For assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, requires quantitative disclosures about the fair value measurements separately for each major category of assets and liabilities. The only assets or liabilities the Company has at June 30, 2008 that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis are the assets held in the Supplemental Executive Retirement Program (SERP) and an interest rate hedge contract. The Companys valuations related to these items are based on assumptions derived from significant other observable inputs and accordingly fall into Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of these assets and liabilities at June 30, 2008 is as follows (in millions):
June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||
Fair Value |
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||
SERP |
$ | 0.8 | $ | | $ | 0.8 | $ | | ||||
Derivatives |
$ | 0.4 | $ | | $ | 0.4 | $ | |
Derivative Instruments
In February 2008, we entered into an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $100 million that qualifies as a cash flow hedge under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (see Note 6 for further details). We enter into interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to variable rate interest risk. We do not purchase derivatives for speculation. Our cash flow hedges are recorded at fair value. The effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges is recorded in other comprehensive income. The ineffective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges is recorded in earnings in the period affected. We assess effectiveness of our cash flow hedges both at inception and on an ongoing basis. The hedge was deemed effective in the 2008 Quarter and Period. We did not have any cash flow hedges during 2007.
Stock Based Compensation
We maintained a Share Grant Plan and Incentive Stock Option Plans as described in Note 7, and pursuant to those plans we made restricted share grants and granted share options to officers, eligible employees and trustees. Officer share grants vesting over five years vest in annual installments commencing one year after the date of grant, and share grants vesting over three years vest twenty-five percent from date of grant in years one and two and fifty percent in year three. Officer performance share units, granted under an amendment to the Share Grant Plan, cliff vest at the end of a three year performance period. Officer and non-officer employee restricted share units, granted under an amendment to the Share Grant Plan, vest over five years. Trustee share grants are fully vested immediately upon date of share grant and are restricted from transferability for the period of the trustees service.
In March 2007, the WRIT Board of Trustees adopted, and in July 2007 WRIT shareholders approved, the Washington Real Estate Investment Trust 2007 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (2007 Plan). This plan replaced the Share Grant Plan, which expired on December 15, 2007, as well as the 2001 Stock Option Plan and Stock Option Plan for Trustees. As described above, the shares and options granted pursuant to the above plans are not affected by the adoption of the 2007 Plan. However, if an award under the Share Grant Plan is forfeited or an award of options granted under the Option Plans expires without being exercised, the shares covered by those awards will not be available for issuance under the 2007 Plan.
The 2007 Plan provides for the award to WRITs trustees, officers and non-officer employees of restricted shares, restricted share units, options and other awards to acquire up to an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares over the ten year period in which the plan will be in effect. If an award under the 2007 Plan of restricted shares or restricted share units is forfeited or an award of options or any other rights granted under the 2007 Plan expires without being exercised, the shares covered by any such award would again become available for issuance under new awards.
12
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
Compensation expense is recognized for share grants over the vesting period equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date of issuance. Compensation expense for the trustee grants, which fully vest immediately, is fully recognized upon issuance based upon the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. The unvested portion of officer and non-officer employee share grants is recognized in compensation cost over the vesting period.
Unvested shares are forfeited upon an employees termination except for employees eligible for retirement whose unvested shares fully vest upon retirement. For shares granted to employees who are eligible for retirement or will become eligible for retirement during the vesting period, compensation cost is recognized over the explicit service period with acceleration of expense upon the date of actual retirement for these employees. The Company will continue this practice for awards granted prior to January 1, 2006, when SFAS No. 123R was adopted, and for shares granted after the adoption of SFAS No. 123R the Company will recognize compensation expense through the date that the employee is no longer required to provide service to earn the award (e.g. the date the employee is eligible to retire).
Stock options were historically issued annually to officers, non-officer key employees and trustees under the Incentive Stock Option Plans. They were last issued to officers in 2002, to non-officer key employees in 2003 and to trustees in 2004. The options vested over a 2-year period in annual installments commencing one year after the date of grant, except for trustee options which vested immediately upon the date of grant. Stock options issued prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R are accounted for in accordance with APB No. 25, whereby if options are priced at fair market value or above at the date of grant and if other requirements are met then the plans are considered fixed and no compensation expense is recognized. Accordingly, we have recognized no compensation cost for stock options.
Earnings per Common Share
We calculate basic and diluted earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common shares were exercised or converted into common shares, and then shared in our earnings. Sources of potentially dilutive common shares are our share based payment plans, operating partnership units and senior convertible notes. The senior convertible notes were not dilutive for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 or June 30, 2007.
13
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (dollars in thousands; except per share data):
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
Numerator for basic and diluted per share calculations: |
||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 5,294 | $ | 6,836 | $ | 2,959 | $ | 16,510 | ||||
Discontinued operations including gain on sale of real estate |
15,914 | 1,501 | 16,761 | 2,539 | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 21,208 | $ | 8,337 | $ | 19,720 | $ | 19,049 | ||||
Denominator for basic and diluted per share calculations: |
||||||||||||
Denominator for basic per share amounts weighted average shares |
47,933 | 45,490 | 47,278 | 45,212 | ||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||
Employee stock options/restricted share awards and units |
133 | 168 | 135 | 195 | ||||||||
Operating partnership units |
82 | | 82 | | ||||||||
Denominator for diluted per share amounts |
48,148 | 45,658 | 47,495 | 45,407 | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations per share |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.11 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.37 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.11 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.36 | ||||
Discontinued operations including gain on disposal |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.05 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.06 | ||||
Net income per share |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.44 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.42 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.44 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.42 |
Use of Estimates in the Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
We recorded other comprehensive income of $0.4 million for the period ended June 30, 2008 to account for the change in valuation of an interest rate swap agreement that qualifies as a cash flow hedge under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. We recorded no other comprehensive income or loss for 2007.
14
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 3: REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS
Our real estate investment portfolio, at cost, consists of properties located in Maryland, Washington, D.C. and Virginia as follows (in thousands):
June 30, 2008 |
December 31, 2007 | |||||
Office buildings |
$ | 817,110 | $ | 817,508 | ||
Medical office buildings |
363,885 | 354,485 | ||||
Retail centers |
265,734 | 257,966 | ||||
Multifamily properties |
267,051 | 229,241 | ||||
Industrial/Flex properties |
317,284 | 304,920 | ||||
$ | 2,031,064 | $ | 1,964,120 | |||
The amounts above reflect properties classified as continuing operations, which means they are to be held and used in rental operations (income producing property).
We have several properties in development in our office and multifamily sectors. In the multifamily sector, Bennett Park was substantially completed in the fourth quarter of 2007, and The Clayborne Apartments were substantially completed in the first quarter of 2008. The cost of our real estate portfolio in development is illustrated below (in thousands):
June 30, 2008 |
December 31, 2007 | |||||
Office buildings |
$ | 53,758 | $ | 56,311 | ||
Medical office buildings |
4,289 | 4,016 | ||||
Retail centers |
159 | 74 | ||||
Multifamily |
301 | 37,920 | ||||
Industrial/Flex properties |
253 | | ||||
$ | 58,760 | $ | 98,321 | |||
We dispose of assets (sometimes using tax-deferred exchanges) that are inconsistent with our long-term strategic or return objectives and when market conditions for sale are favorable. The proceeds from the sales may be redeployed into other properties, used to fund development operations or to support other corporate needs, or distributed to our shareholders. Two office properties, Maryland Trade Centers I and II, were sold as of September 30, 2007 and initially classified as held for sale as of March 31, 2007. Two industrial properties, Sullyfield Center and The Earhart Building, were sold on June 6, 2008 and initially classified as held for sale in November 2007. They were sold for a contract sales price of $41.1 million that resulted in a gain on sale of $15.3 million.
Operating results of the properties classified as discontinued operations are summarized as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 832 | $ | 2,777 | $ | 1,930 | $ | 5,519 | ||||||||
Property expenses |
(193 | ) | (1,028 | ) | (444 | ) | (2,083 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| (248 | ) | | (897 | ) | ||||||||||
$ | 639 | $ | 1,501 | $ | 1,486 | $ | 2,539 | |||||||||
15
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
Operating results by property are summarized below (in thousands):
Segment | Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
Property |
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Maryland Trade Center I |
Office | $ | | $ | 533 | $ | | $ | 840 | |||||
Maryland Trade Center II |
Office | | 483 | | 765 | |||||||||
Sullyfield Center |
Industrial | 469 | 301 | 1,065 | 584 | |||||||||
The Earhart Building |
Industrial | 170 | 184 | 421 | 350 | |||||||||
$ | 639 | $ | 1,501 | $ | 1,486 | $ | 2,539 | |||||||
Our results of operations are dependent on the overall economic health of our markets, tenants and the specific segments in which we own properties. These segments include commercial office, medical office, retail, multifamily and industrial. All sectors are affected by external economic factors, such as inflation, consumer confidence, unemployment rates, etc., as well as by changing tenant and consumer requirements. Because the properties are located in the Washington metro region, the Company is subject to a concentration of credit risk related to these properties.
WRIT acquired the following properties during the first six months of 2008:
Acquisition Date |
Property Name |
Property Type |
Rentable Square Feet |
Purchase Price (in thousands) | |||||
February 22, 2008 |
6100 Columbia Park Road | Industrial/Flex | 150,000 | $ | 11,200 | ||||
May 21, 2008 |
Sterling Medical Office Building | Medical office | 36,000 | 6,500 | |||||
Total 2008 Period |
186,000 | $ | 17,700 | ||||||
As discussed in Note 2, we allocate the purchase price to the related physical assets (land, building and tenant improvements) and in-place leases (absorption, tenant origination costs, leasing commissions, and net lease intangible assets/liabilities) based on their fair values, in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. Our acquisition of the properties listed above resulted in the recognition of $1.1 million in absorption costs and $0.2 million in leasing commissions, $0.6 million in tenant origination costs and $0.2 million in net intangible lease liabilities. The weighted average remaining life for these components are 57 months for tenant origination costs, 66 months for leasing commissions/absorption costs, and 49 months for net intangible lease liabilities. The results of operations from these acquired properties are included in the income statement as of their respective acquisition dates.
The purchases were funded with cash from operations and borrowings on our line of credit.
The following unaudited pro-forma combined condensed statements of operations present the consolidated results of operations for the 2008 Quarter and Period and the 2007 Quarter and Period, as if the above described acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of the period of acquisition and the same period in the year prior to the acquisition. The unaudited pro-forma information does not purport to be indicative of the results that actually would have occurred if the acquisitions had been in effect for the Quarters and Periods presented. The unaudited data presented is in millions, except per share data.
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
Real estate revenues |
$ | 69.9 | $ | 63.7 | $ | 140.5 | $ | 124.1 | ||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 5.3 | $ | 6.9 | $ | 3.0 | $ | 16.7 | ||||
Net income |
$ | 21.2 | $ | 8.4 | $ | 19.8 | $ | 19.3 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.44 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.42 |
16
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 4: MORTGAGE NOTES PAYABLE
(in thousands) | ||||||
June 30, 2008 |
December 31, 2007 | |||||
On September 27, 1999, we executed a $50.0 million mortgage note payable secured by Munson Hill Towers, Country Club Towers, Roosevelt Towers, Park Adams Apartments and the Ashby of McLean. The mortgage bears interest at 7.14% per annum and interest only is payable monthly until October 1, 2009, at which time all unpaid principal and interest are payable in full. | $ | 50,000 | $ | 50,000 | ||
On October 9, 2003, we assumed a $36.1 million mortgage note payable and a $13.7 million mortgage note payable as partial consideration for our acquisition of the Prosperity Medical Centers. The mortgages bear interest at 5.36% per annum and 5.34% per annum, respectively. Principal and interest are payable monthly until May 1, 2013, at which time all unpaid principal and interest are payable in full. | 46,299 | 46,644 | ||||
On August 12, 2004, we assumed a $10.1 million mortgage note payable, with an estimated fair value* of $11.2 million, as partial consideration for our acquisition of Shady Grove Medical Village II. The mortgage bears interest at 6.98% per annum. Principal and interest are payable monthly until December 1, 2011, at which time all unpaid principal and interest are payable in full. | 10,140 | 10,286 | ||||
On December 22, 2004, we assumed a $15.6 million mortgage note payable, with an estimated fair value* of $17.8 million, and a $3.9 million mortgage note payable with an estimated fair value of $4.2 million as partial consideration for our acquisition of Dulles Business Park. The mortgages bear interest at 7.09% per annum and 5.94% per annum, respectively. Principal and interest are payable monthly until August 10, 2012, at which time all unpaid principal and interest are payable in full. | 19,924 | 20,235 | ||||
On March 23, 2005 we assumed a $24.3 million mortgage note payable, with an estimated fair value* of $25.0 million, as partial consideration for the acquisition of Frederick Crossing. The mortgage bears interest at 5.95% per annum. Principal and interest are payable monthly until January 1, 2013 at which time all unpaid principal and interest are payable in full. | 23,547 | 23,783 | ||||
On April 13, 2006, we assumed a $5.7 million mortgage note payable as partial consideration for the acquisition of 9707 Medical Center Drive. The mortgage bears interest at 5.32% per annum. Principal and interest are payable monthly until July 1, 2028 at which time all unpaid principal and interest are payable in full. | 5,354 | 5,428 | ||||
On June 22, 2006, we assumed a $4.9 million mortgage note payable as partial consideration for the acquisition of Plumtree Medical Center. The mortgage bears interest at 5.68% per annum. Principal and interest are payable monthly until March 11, 2013 at which time all unpaid principal and interest are payable in full. | 4,723 | 4,762 | ||||
On July 12, 2006, we assumed an $8.8 million mortgage note payable as partial consideration for the acquisition of 15005 Shady Grove Road. The mortgage bears interest at 5.73% per annum. Principal and interest are payable monthly until March 11, 2013 at which time all unpaid principal and interest are payable in full. | 8,541 | 8,613 | ||||
On August 25, 2006, we assumed a $34.2 million mortgage note payable as partial consideration for the acquisition of 20-50 West Gude Drive. The mortgage bears interest at 5.86% per annum. Principal and interest are payable monthly until March 11, 2013 at which time all unpaid principal and interest are payable in full. | 33,121 | 33,417 | ||||
On August 25, 2006, we assumed a $23.1 million mortgage note payable as partial consideration for the acquisition of 902-904 Wind River Lane and 200 Orchard Ridge Road. The mortgage bears interest at 5.82%** per annum. Principal and interest are payable monthly until August 11, 2033** at which time all unpaid principal and interest are payable in full. The note may be repaid without penalty on August 11, 2010. | 22,462 | 22,641 |
17
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
On June 1, 2007, we assumed a $21.2 million mortgage note payable as partial consideration for the acquisition of Woodholme Medical Office Building. The mortgage bears interest at 5.29% per annum. Principal is payable beginning November 1, 2007, and principal and interest are payable monthly until November 1, 2015 at which time all unpaid principal and interest are payable in full. | 21,038 | 21,176 | ||||
On June 1, 2007, we assumed a $3.1 million mortgage note payable and a $3.0 million mortgage note payable as partial consideration for our acquisition of the Ashburn Farm Office Park. The mortgages bear interest at 5.56% per annum and 5.69% per annum, respectively. Principal and interest are payable monthly until May 31, 2025 and July 31, 2023, respectively, at which time all unpaid principal and interest are payable in full. | 5,397 | 5,499 | ||||
On May 29, 2008, we executed an $81.0 million mortgage note payable secured by 3801 Connecticut, Walker House and Bethesda Hill. The mortgage bears interest at 5.71% per annum and interest only is payable monthly until May 31, 2016, at which time all unpaid principal and interest are payable in full. | 81,029 | | ||||
$ | 331,575 | $ | 252,484 | |||
* | The fair value of the mortgage notes payable was estimated upon acquisition based upon dealer quotes for instruments with similar terms and maturities. There is no notation when the fair value approximates the carrying value. |
** | If the loan is not repaid on August 11, 2010, from and after August 11, 2010, the interest rate adjusts to one of the following rates: (i) the greater of (A) 10.82% or (B) the Treasury Rate (determined as of August 11, 2010, and defined as the yield calculated using linear interpolation approximating the period from August 11, 2010 to August 11, 2033 on the basis of Federal Reserve Stat. Release H.15-Selected Interest Rates under the heading U.S. Governmental Security/Treasury Constant Maturities) plus 5%; or (ii) if the Note is an asset of an entity formed for purposes of securitization and pursuant thereto securities rated by a rating agency have been issued, then the rate will equal: the greater of (A) 7.82% or (B) the Treasury Rate plus 2%. Due to the high probability that the mortgage will be paid off on August 11, 2010, that date is reflected in the future maturities schedule. |
Total carrying amount of the above mortgaged properties was $507.6 million and $449.3 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Scheduled principal payments for the remaining six months in 2008 and the remaining years subsequent to December 31, 2008 are as follows (in thousands):
Total Principal Payments | |||
2008 |
$ | 2,119 | |
2009 |
54,285 | ||
2010 |
25,973 | ||
2011 |
13,339 | ||
2012 |
21,088 | ||
Thereafter |
214,771 | ||
Total |
$ | 331,575 | |
NOTE 5: UNSECURED LINES OF CREDIT PAYABLE
As of June 30, 2008, we maintained a $75.0 million unsecured line of credit maturing in June 2011 (Credit Facility No. 1) and a $262.0 million line of credit maturing in November 2010 (Credit Facility No. 2).
Credit Facility No. 1
Credit Facility No. 1 replaced Credit Facility No. 3 (see below) on June 29, 2007. We had $15.0 million outstanding as of June 30, 2008 related to Credit Facility No. 1, and $14.5 million in Letters of Credit issued, with $45.5 million unused and available capacity. The balance under this facility was $70.0 million at December 31, 2007. During the second quarter of 2008, $37.0 million was repaid using a portion of the proceeds of the $90.5 million equity offering. WRIT has the option to further increase the capacity under the facility up to $200 million to the extent the bank agrees to provide the additional commitment.
Borrowings under the facility bear interest at our option of LIBOR plus a spread based on the credit rating on our publicly issued debt or SunTrust Banks prime rate. All outstanding advances are due and payable upon maturity in June 2011. Interest only payments are due and payable generally on a monthly basis. For 2008 Quarter and Period, we incurred interest expense (excluding facility fees) of $589,200 and $1,417,100, respectively, representing an average interest rate of 5.36% and 5.27% per annum, respectively.
18
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
In addition, we pay a facility fee, based on the credit rating of our publicly-issued debt, currently equal to 0.15% per annum of the $75.0 million committed capacity, without regard to usage. Rates and fees may be adjusted up or down based on changes in our senior unsecured credit ratings. For the 2008 Quarter and Period, we incurred facility fees of $28,400 and $46,300, respectively. During the 2007 Quarter and Period, there were no borrowings, and no facility fees or interest expense were incurred on Credit Facility No. 1.
Credit Facility No. 2
We had no borrowings outstanding as of June 30, 2008 related to Credit Facility No. 2, and $0.9 million in Letters of Credit issued, with $261.1 million unused and available for subsequent acquisitions or capital improvements. At December 31, 2007, $122.5 million was outstanding under this facility. During the second quarter of 2008, $122.5 million was repaid, using a portion of the proceeds of the $90.5 million equity offering and the new mortgages of $81.0 million (see Note 4).
On January 25, 2008, WRIT exercised the right to increase the capacity of the unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks led by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association from $200 million to $262 million. The maturity date and all other terms remain materially unchanged. WRIT has the option to further increase the capacity under the facility up to $400 million to the extent banks (from the syndicate or otherwise) agree to provide the additional commitment.
Advances under this agreement bear interest at our option of LIBOR plus a spread based on the credit rating on our publicly issued debt or the higher of Wells Fargo Banks prime rate and the Federal Funds Rate in effect on that day plus 0.5%. All outstanding advances are due and payable upon maturity in November 2010. Interest only payments are due and payable generally on a monthly basis. For the 2008 Quarter and Period, we incurred interest expense (excluding facility fees) of approximately $1,238,900 and $2,836,400, respectively, representing an average interest rate of 5.58% and 5.33%, respectively, per annum. For the 2007 Quarter and Period, we incurred interest expense (excluding facility fees) of approximately $1,341,600 and $1,817,800, respectively, representing an average interest rate of 5.81% and 5.79%, respectively, per annum.
Currently, Credit Facility No. 2 requires us to pay the lender a facility fee on the total commitment of 0.15% per annum. These fees are payable quarterly. For the 2008 Quarter and Period, we incurred facility fees of $99,300 and $192,500, respectively. For the 2007 Quarter and Period, we incurred facility fees of $76,000 and $151,000, respectively.
Credit Facility No. 3
Credit Facility No. 3 was replaced by Credit Facility No. 1 on June 29, 2007. Advances under this agreement bore interest at LIBOR plus a spread based on the credit rating on our publicly issued debt. There were no borrowings outstanding and payable under the facility upon the termination of the agreement in June 2007. Interest only payments were due and payable on a monthly basis. For the 2007 Period, we incurred $96,400 in interest expense (excluding facility fees) representing an average interest rate of 5.90%.
Credit Facility No. 3 required us to pay the lender a facility fee on the total commitment of 0.15% per annum, based on the credit rating on our publicly issued debt. These fees were payable quarterly. We incurred facility fees of $26,500 and $52,800 for the 2007 Quarter and Period, respectively.
Credit Facility No. 1 and No. 2 contain certain financial and non-financial covenants, all of which we have been met as of June 30, 2008.
NOTE 6: NOTES PAYABLE
On February 20, 1998, we issued $50.0 million of 7.25% unsecured notes due February 25, 2028 at 98.653% to yield approximately 7.36%. We also sold $60.0 million in unsecured Mandatory Par Put Remarketed Securities (MOPPRS) at an effective borrowing rate through the remarketing date (February 2008) of approximately 6.74%. On February 25, 2008, we repaid the $60 million outstanding principal balance under the MOPPRS notes. The total aggregate consideration paid to repurchase the notes was $70.8 million, which included $8.7 million for the remarketing option value paid to the remarketing dealer and accrued interest paid to the noteholders. Accordingly, WRIT recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $8.4 million, net of unamortized loan premium costs, upon settlement of these securities. WRIT refinanced the repurchase of these notes, and refinanced a portion of the line outstanding, by issuing the $100 million 2-year term loan described below.
19
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
On March 17, 2003, we issued $60.0 million of 5.125% unsecured notes due March 2013. The notes bear an effective interest rate of 5.23%. Our total proceeds, net of underwriting fees, were $59.1 million. We used portions of the proceeds of these notes to repay advances on our lines of credit and to fund general corporate purposes.
On December 11, 2003, we issued $100.0 million of 5.25% unsecured notes due January 2014. The notes bear an effective interest rate of 5.34%. Our total proceeds, net of underwriting fees, were $99.3 million. We used portions of the proceeds of these notes to repay advances on our lines of credit.
On April 26, 2005, we issued $50.0 million of 5.05% senior unsecured notes due May 1, 2012 and $50.0 million of 5.35% senior unsecured notes due May 1, 2015, at effective yields of 5.064% and 5.359% respectively. The net proceeds from the sale of the notes of $99.1 million were used to repay borrowings under our lines of credit totaling $90.5 million and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes.
On October 6, 2005, we issued an additional $100.0 million of notes of the series of 5.35% senior unsecured notes due May 1, 2015, at an effective yield of 5.49%. $93.5 million of the $98.1 million net proceeds from the sale of these notes was used to repay borrowings under our lines of credit and the remainder was used to fund general corporate purposes.
On June 6, 2006, we issued $100.0 million of 5.95% unsecured notes due June 15, 2011 at 99.951% of par, resulting in an effective interest rate of 5.96%. Our total proceeds, net of underwriting fees, were $99.4 million. We used the proceeds of these notes to repay advances on one of our lines of credit.
On July 26, 2006, we issued an additional $50.0 million of the series of 5.95% unsecured notes due June 15, 2011 at 100.127% of par, resulting in an effective yield of 5.92%. Our total proceeds, net of underwriting fees, were $50.2 million. We used the proceeds of these notes to repay borrowings under our lines of credit and to fund general corporate purposes.
On September 11, 2006, we issued $100.0 million of 3.875% senior convertible notes due September 15, 2026. On September 22, 2006, we issued an additional $10.0 million of the 3.875% senior convertible notes due September 15, 2026, upon the exercise by the underwriter of an over-allotment option granted by WRIT. The notes were issued at 99.5% of par, resulting in an effective interest rate of 4.000%. Our total proceeds, net of underwriting fees, were $106.7 million. We used the proceeds of these notes to repay borrowings under our lines of credit and to fund general corporate purposes.
On January 22, 2007, we issued an additional $135.0 million of the 3.875% senior convertible notes due September 15, 2026. On January 30, 2007, we issued an additional $15.0 million of the 3.875% senior convertible notes due September 15, 2026, upon the exercise by the underwriter of an over-allotment option granted by WRIT. The notes were issued at 100.5% of par, resulting in an effective interest rate of 4.003%. Our total proceeds, net of underwriting fees, were $146.0 million. We used the proceeds of these notes to fund the acquisition of 270 Technology Park and a portion of the acquisition of Monument II, to repay borrowings under our lines of credit, and to fund general corporate purposes.
The senior convertible notes are convertible into shares of our common stock, at the option of the holder, under specific circumstances or on or after July 15, 2026, at an initial exchange rate of 20.090 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes. This is equivalent to an initial conversion price of $49.78 per share, which represents a 22% premium over the $40.80 closing price of our shares at the time the September 2006 transaction was priced and a 21% premium over the $41.17 closing price of our shares at the time the January 2007 transaction was priced. Holders may convert their notes into shares of our common stock prior to the maturity date based on the applicable conversion rate during any fiscal quarter if the closing price of our common stock for at least 20 trading days in the 30 consecutive trading day period ending on the last trading day of the immediate preceding fiscal quarter is more than 130% of the conversion price per share on the last day of such preceding fiscal quarter. The initial conversion rate is subject to adjustment in certain circumstances including an adjustment to the rate if the quarterly dividend rate to common shareholders is in excess of $0.4125 per share. In addition, the conversion rate will be adjusted if we make distributions of cash or other consideration by us or any of our subsidiaries in respect of a tender offer or exchange offer for our common stock, to the extent such cash and the value of any such other consideration per share of common stock validly tendered or exchanged exceeds the closing price of our common stock as defined in the note offering. Upon an exchange of notes, we will settle any amounts up to the principal amount of the notes in cash and the remaining exchange value, if any, will be settled, at our option, in cash, common shares or a combination thereof. The senior convertible notes could have a dilutive impact on our earnings per share calculation in the future. However, these notes are not dilutive for the 2008 and 2007 Quarters or Periods, and are not included in our earnings per share calculations.
20
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
On or after September 20, 2011, we may redeem the notes at a redemption price equal to the principal amount of the notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest, if any, up to, but excluding, the purchase date. In addition, on September 15, 2011, September 15, 2016 and September 15, 2021 or following the occurrence of certain change in control transactions prior to September 15, 2011, holders of these notes may require us to repurchase the notes for an amount equal to the principal amount of the notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest thereon.
On February 21, 2008 we entered into a $100 million unsecured term loan (the 2010 Term Loan) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. The 2010 Term Loan has a maturity date of February 19, 2010 and bears interest at our option of LIBOR plus 1.50% or Wells Fargos prime rate. To hedge our exposure to interest rate fluctuations on the $100 million note, we entered into an interest rate swap, which fixed the LIBOR portion of the interest rate on the term loan at 2.95% through February 2010. The current interest rate, taking into account the swap, is 4.45% (2.95% plus 150 basis points) on a notional amount of $100 million. The interest rate swap agreement will settle contemporaneously with the maturity of the loan. This swap qualifies as a cash flow hedge as discussed in Note 1.
The following is a summary of our unsecured note borrowings (in thousands):
June 30, 2008 |
December 31, 2007 |
|||||||
6.74% notes due 2008 |
$ | | $ | 60,000 | ||||
4.45% note due 2010 |
100,000 | | ||||||
5.95% notes due 2011 |
150,000 | 150,000 | ||||||
5.05% notes due 2012 |
50,000 | 50,000 | ||||||
5.125% notes due 2013 |
60,000 | 60,000 | ||||||
5.25% notes due 2014 |
100,000 | 100,000 | ||||||
5.35% notes due 2015 |
150,000 | 150,000 | ||||||
3.875% notes due 2026 |
260,000 | 260,000 | ||||||
7.25% notes due 2028 |
50,000 | 50,000 | ||||||
Discount on notes issued |
(1,897 | ) | (1,999 | ) | ||||
Premium on notes issued |
731 | 1,122 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 918,834 | $ | 879,123 |
The required principal payments excluding the effects of note discounts or premium for the remaining six months in 2008 and the remaining years subsequent to December 31, 2008 are as follows (in thousands):
2008 |
$ | | |
2009 |
| ||
2010 |
100,000 | ||
2011 |
150,000 | ||
2012 |
50,000 | ||
Thereafter |
620,000 | ||
$ | 920,000 |
Interest on these notes is payable semi-annually, with the exception of the 2010 Term Loan, on which interest is payable monthly. All of the notes include certain non-financial covenants, and the non-convertible notes also include certain financial covenants, with which we must comply. The financial covenants include limits on our total debt, limits on our secured debt, limits on our required debt service payments and maintenance of a minimum level of unencumbered assets. We were in compliance with all of our note covenants as of June 30, 2008.
The covenants under the line of credit agreements require us to insure our properties against loss or damage in the amount of the replacement cost of the improvements at the properties. The covenants for the notes require us to keep all of our insurable properties insured against loss or damage at least equal to their then full insurable value. We have an insurance policy which has no terrorism exclusion; however, our financial condition and results of operations are subject to the risks associated with acts of terrorism and the potential for uninsured losses as the result of any such acts. Effective November 26, 2002, under this existing coverage, any losses caused by certified acts of terrorism would be partially reimbursed by the United States under a formula established by federal law. Under this formula the United States pays 85% of covered terrorism losses exceeding the statutorily established deductible paid by the insurance provider, and insurers pay 10% until aggregate insured losses from all insurers reach $100 billion in a calendar year. If the aggregate amount of insured losses under the Act exceeds $100 billion
21
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
during the applicable period for all insured and insurers combined, then each insurance provider will not be liable for payment of any amount which exceeds the aggregate amount of $100 billion. On December 26, 2007, the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007 was signed into law and extends the Program through December 31, 2014.
NOTE 7: BENEFIT PLANS
Share Options and Grants
Options
In March 2007, the WRIT Board of Trustees adopted, and in July 2007 WRIT shareholders approved, the Washington Real Estate Investment Trust 2007 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (2007 Plan). This plan replaced the Share Grant Plan, which expired on December 15, 2007, as well as the 2001 Stock Option Plan and Stock Option Plan for Trustees. As described above, the shares and options granted pursuant to the above plans are not affected by the adoption of the 2007 Plan. However, if an award under the Share Grant Plan is forfeited or an award of options granted under the Option Plans expires without being exercised, the shares covered by those awards will not be available for issuance under the 2007 Plan.
The 2007 Plan provides for the award to WRITs trustees, officers and non-officer employees of restricted shares, restricted share units, options and other awards up to an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares over the ten year period in which the plan will be in effect. If an award under the 2007 Plan of restricted shares or restricted share units is forfeited or an award of options or any other rights granted under the 2007 Plan expires without being exercised, the shares covered by any such award would again become available for issuance under new awards.
We adopted the Washington Real Estate Investment Trust 2001 Stock Option Plan to replace the 1991 Stock Option Plan that expired on June 25, 2001. The plans provided for the grant of qualified and non-qualified options. Options granted under the plans were granted with exercise prices equal to the market price on the date of grant vested 50% after year one and 50% after year two and expire ten years following the date of grant. We adopted the Washington Real Estate Investment Trust Stock Option Plan for Trustees in March 1998. Options granted to trustees were granted with exercise prices equal to the market price on the date of grant and were fully vested on the grant date. The last option awards to officers were in 2002, to non-officer key employees in 2003 and to trustees in 2004.
2008 | |||||
Shares | Wtd Avg Ex Price | ||||
Outstanding at January 1 |
438,000 | 24.40 | |||
Granted |
| | |||
Exercised |
(99,000 | ) | 21.57 | ||
Expired/Forfeited |
| | |||
Outstanding at June 30 |
339,000 | 25.23 | |||
Exercisable at June 30 |
339,000 | 25.23 |
The 339,000 options outstanding at June 30, 2008, all of which are exercisable, have exercise prices between $14.47 and $33.09, with a weighted-average exercise price of $25.23 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 4.0 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding exercisable shares at June 30, 2008 was $1.6 million. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised in the 2008 Period was $1.1 million. There were no forfeitures of options in the 2008 Period.
Share Grants, Performance Share Units and Restricted Share Units
We maintained a Share Grant Plan for officers, trustees, and other members of management.
In 2004 and 2005, awards were granted to officers and other members of management in the form of restricted shares, with a value equal to various percentages of a participants salary based upon WRITs performance compared to an appropriate benchmark target, with minimum and maximum thresholds. The awards were valued based on market value at the date of grant. Shares vest ratably over a five year period from the date of grant.
22
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
In December 2006, the WRIT Board of Trustees approved a program providing for the granting of restricted share units to officers and other members of management and performance share units to officers based upon various percentages of their salaries and their positions with WRIT. For officers, one-third of the award is in the form of restricted share units that vest twenty percent per year based upon continued employment and two-thirds of the award is in the form of performance share units. Performance targets are set annually based on appropriate benchmarks with minimum and maximum thresholds. The performance share unit awards are based on cumulative performance over three years, and will cliff vest at the end of the three year period. For other members of management, 100% of the award will be in the form of restricted shares that vest 20% per year from date of grant based on performance targets. WRITs Chairman and former CEO was excluded from long-term awards under the program in view of his announced intention to retire in 2007. With respect to the performance share units, which are based on three-year cumulative performance targets set at the beginning of each year, the grant date does not occur until all such targets are set and thus the significant terms of the award are known. Because payouts are probable, the Company estimates the compensation expense at each reporting period, until the grant date occurs and as progress towards meeting target is known, and recognizes this expense ratably over the three-year period. The estimated expense related to the 2006 performance share units is approximately $1.6 million, of which $128,000 and $154,000 were recognized during the 2008 Quarter and Period, respectively. The 2006 estimate is based on the stock price on the grant date that coincides with the date that the three-year target was approved. The estimated expense related to the 2007 performance share units at the end of the three-year period is approximately $1.7 million, with minimal expense recognized during the 2008 Quarter and Period. The estimated expense related to the 2008 performance share units at the end of the three-year period is approximately $1.7 million, of which $105,000 and $269,000 were recognized during the 2008 Quarter and Period, respectively. Participants who terminate prior to the end of the three-year performance period forfeit their entire portion of the award. There were 2,734 restricted share units awarded to other members of management in February 2008. Effective in 2007 under the Long Term Incentive Plan, elected deferrals of short term incentive awards by officers are converted into restricted share units which vest immediately on the grant date and WRIT will match 25% of the deferred short term incentive in restricted share units, which vest at the end of three years. Dividends on these restricted share units are paid in the form of restricted share units valued based on the market value of WRITs stock on the date dividends are paid. WRIT granted 4,783 restricted share units to officers in 2007 pursuant to elective short term incentive deferrals. Performance and restricted share units awarded were valued at a weighted average price per share based upon the market value on the date of grant, as follows:
Shares | Wtd Avg Grant Price | |||
2006 |
21,877 | 39.54 | ||
2007 |
62,572 | 32.96 | ||
2008 |
2,864 | 31.70 |
In May 2007, the value of the restricted shares awarded to trustees was increased to $55,000 from $30,000. These shares vest immediately and are restricted from sale for the period of the trustees service.
The following are tables of activity for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 related to our share grants and restricted share unit grants.
Share Grants
2008 | |||||
Shares | Wtd Avg Grant Price | ||||
Vested at January 1 |
271,650 | 28.97 | |||
Unvested at January 1 |
62,530 | 34.15 | |||
Granted |
| | |||
Vested during period |
(18,653 | ) | 34.47 | ||
Expired/Forfeited |
| | |||
Unvested at June 30 |
43,877 | 34.02 | |||
Vested at June 30 |
290,303 | 29.32 |
23
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
There were no shares granted during the 2008 Period. The total fair value of shares vested during the Period ending June 30, 2008 is $0.6 million. As of June 30, 2008, the total compensation cost related to non-vested share awards not yet recognized was $0.9 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 14 months on a straight-line basis.
Restricted Share Units
2008 | |||||
Shares | Wtd Avg Grant Price | ||||
Vested at January 1 |
8,154 | 35.73 | |||
Unvested at January 1 |
80,831 | 34.35 | |||
Granted |
2,864 | 31.70 | |||
Vested during period |
(8,138 | ) | 36.90 | ||
Expired/Forfeited |
(694 | ) | 32.99 | ||
Unvested at June 30 |
74,863 | 33.99 | |||
Vested at June 30 |
16,292 | 36.31 |
The value of unvested restricted share units at June 30, 2008 was $2.3 million, which is expected to be recognized as compensation cost over a period of 43 months on a straight-line basis.
Total compensation expense recognized for stock based awards in the 2008 Quarter and Period was $0.5 million and $1.0 million, respectively, and $1.2 million and $1.7 million for the 2007 Quarter and Period, respectively.
Other Benefit Plans
We have a Retirement Savings Plan (the 401K Plan), which permits all eligible employees to defer a portion of their compensation in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code. Under the 401K Plan, the Company may make discretionary contributions on behalf of eligible employees. The Company made contributions to the 401K Plan of $102,000 and $221,000 for the 2008 Quarter and Period, respectively, and $94,000 and $198,000 for the 2007 Quarter and Period, respectively.
We have adopted a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for the officers and members of the Board of Trustees. The plan allows for a deferral of a percentage of annual cash compensation and trustee fees. The plan is unfunded and payments are to be made out of the general assets of the Trust. The deferred compensation liability was $2.0 million and $2.1 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Subsequent to the end of the 2008 Period, the prior CEO received a lump sum distribution of the present value of his deferred compensation. The plans liability after the distribution is minimal. Effective in 2007 under the Long Term Incentive Plan, elected deferrals of short term incentive awards by officers are converted into restricted share units and WRIT will match 25% of the deferred short term incentive in restricted share units, which vests at the end of three years.
We established a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) effective July 1, 2002 for the benefit of our prior CEO, who retired on May 31, 2007. Under this plan, upon the prior CEOs termination of employment from the Trust for any reason other than death, discharge for cause, or total and permanent disability he was entitled to receive an annual benefit equal to his accrued benefit times his vested interest. We accounted for this plan in accordance with SFAS No. 87, Employers Accounting for Pensions, whereby we accrued benefit cost in an amount that resulted in an accrued balance at the end of the prior CEOs employment which was not less than the present value of the estimated benefit payments to be made. At June 30, 2008 the accrued benefit liability was $2.0 million. For the 2008 Quarter and Period, we recognized current service cost of $33,000 and $66,000, respectively. For the 2007 Quarter and Period, we recognized current service cost of $190,000 and $253,000, respectively. On December 31, 2006, WRIT adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 158. SFAS No. 158 required the Trust to recognize the funded status (i.e., the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligations) of its pension plan in the December 31, 2006 statement of financial position, with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. Because the prior CEOs SERP is unfunded, the adoption of SFAS No. 158 did not have an effect on the Trusts consolidated financial condition at December 31, 2006, or for any prior period presented and it will not affect the Trusts operating results in future periods. The Trust currently has an investment in corporate owned life insurance intended to meet the SERP benefit liability since the prior CEOs retirement. Benefit payments to the prior CEO began in July 2008.
24
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
In November 2005, the Board of Trustees approved the establishment of a SERP for the benefit of the officers, other than the prior CEO. This is a defined contribution plan under which, upon a participants termination of employment from the Trust for any reason other than discharge for cause, the participant will be entitled to receive a benefit equal to the participants accrued benefit times the participants vested interest. We account for this plan in accordance with EITF 97-14, Accounting for Deferred Compensation Arrangements Where Amounts Earned are Held in a Rabbi Trust and Invested and SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, whereby the investments are reported at fair value, and unrealized holding gains and losses are included in earnings. For the 2008 Quarter and Period, we recognized current service cost of $76,000 and $161,000, respectively. For the 2007 Quarter and Period, we recognized current service cost of $53,000 and $106,000, respectively.
NOTE 8: SEGMENT INFORMATION
We have five reportable segments: office buildings, medical office buildings, retail centers, multifamily properties and industrial/flex centers. Office buildings provide office space for various types of businesses and professions. Medical office buildings provide offices and facilities for a variety of medical services. Retail centers are typically neighborhood grocery store or drug store anchored retail centers. Multifamily properties provide housing for families throughout the Washington metropolitan area. Industrial/flex centers are used for flex-office, warehousing and distribution type facilities.
Real estate revenue as a percentage of total revenue for each of the five reportable operating segments is as follows:
Quarter Ended June 30, | Period Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
Office Buildings |
41 | % | 41 | % | 42 | % | 40 | % | ||||
Medical Office Buildings |
15 | % | 14 | % | 15 | % | 14 | % | ||||
Retail Centers |
15 | % | 16 | % | 15 | % | 17 | % | ||||
Multifamily Properties |
14 | % | 13 | % | 13 | % | 13 | % | ||||
Industrial/Flex Centers |
15 | % | 16 | % | 15 | % | 16 | % |
The percentage of total real estate assets, at cost, for each of the five reportable operating segments (excluding properties held for sale and in-development) is as follows:
June 30, 2008 |
December 31, 2007 |
|||||
Office Buildings |
40 | % | 42 | % | ||
Medical Office Buildings |
18 | % | 18 | % | ||
Retail Centers |
13 | % | 13 | % | ||
Multifamily Properties |
13 | % | 12 | % | ||
Industrial/Flex Centers |
16 | % | 15 | % |
The accounting policies of each of the segments are the same as those described in Note 2. We evaluate performance based upon operating income from the combined properties in each segment. Our reportable operating segments are consolidations of similar properties. SFAS No.131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, requires that segment disclosures present the measure(s) used by the chief operating decision maker for purposes of assessing segments performance. Net operating income is a key measurement of our segment profit and loss. Net operating income is defined as segment revenues less direct segment operating expenses.
25
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
The following table presents revenues and net operating income for the 2008 and 2007 Quarters and Periods from these segments, and reconciles net operating income of reportable segments to operating income as reported (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Office Buildings |
Medical Office Buildings |
Retail Centers |
Multifamily | Industrial/Flex Centers |
Corporate And Other |
Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Real estate rental revenue |
$ | 28,717 | $ | 10,868 | $ | 10,341 | $ | 9,565 | $ | 10,277 | $ | | $ | 69,768 | ||||||||
Real estate expenses |
9,810 | 3,439 | 2,411 | 4,592 | 2,551 | | 22,803 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate operating income |
18,907 | 7,429 | 7,930 | 4,973 | 7,726 | | 46,965 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(21,198 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(17,582 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
General and administration expense |
(3,111 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
220 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate |
15,275 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
639 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income (loss) |
$ | 21,208 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 5,840 | $ | 2,113 | $ | 1,291 | $ | 1,621 | $ | 1,830 | $ | 181 | $ | 12,876 | ||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 761,213 | $ | 349,481 | $ | 233,775 | $ | 203,446 | $ | 272,279 | $ | 85,247 | $ | 1,905,441 | ||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Office Buildings |
Medical Office Buildings |
Retail Centers |
Multifamily | Industrial/Flex Centers |
Corporate And Other |
Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Real estate rental revenue |
$ | 25,708 | $ | 9,071 | $ | 10,064 | $ | 8,430 | $ | 9,982 | $ | | $ | 63,255 | ||||||||
Real estate expenses |
8,538 | 2,776 | 2,291 | 3,537 | 2,400 | | 19,542 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate operating income |
17,170 | 6,295 | 7,773 | 4,893 | 7,582 | | 43,713 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(16,632 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(15,298 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
General and administration expense |
(5,367 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
420 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
1,501 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 8,337 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 7,437 | $ | 1,439 | $ | 826 | $ | 1,928 | $ | 1,195 | $ | 1,902 | $ | 14,727 | ||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 722,852 | $ | 329,479 | $ | 230,931 | $ | 184,808 | $ | 291,831 | $ | 37,294 | $ | 1,797,195 | ||||||||
26
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Office Buildings |
Medical Office Buildings |
Retail Centers |
Multifamily | Industrial/Flex Centers |
Corporate And Other |
Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Real estate rental revenue |
$ | 58,419 | $ | 21,602 | $ | 20,987 | $ | 18,379 | $ | 20,659 | $ | | $ | 140,046 | ||||||||
Real estate expenses |
20,355 | 6,949 | 4,683 | 8,837 | 5,112 | | 45,936 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate operating income |
38,064 | 14,653 | 16,304 | 9,542 | 15,547 | | 94,110 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(41,723 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(35,246 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
General and administration expense |
(6,191 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
458 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
(8,449 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate |
15,275 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
1,486 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income (loss) |
$ | 19,720 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 7,913 | $ | 3,074 | $ | 1,656 | $ | 2,951 | $ | 2,422 | $ | 224 | $ | 18,240 | ||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Office Buildings |
Medical Office Buildings |
Retail Centers |
Multifamily | Industrial/Flex Centers |
Corporate And Other |
Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Real estate rental revenue |
$ | 49,547 | $ | 16,772 | $ | 20,753 | $ | 16,603 | $ | 19,432 | $ | | $ | 123,107 | ||||||||
Real estate expenses |
16,534 | 5,087 | 4,545 | 7,155 | 4,927 | | 38,248 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate operating income |
33,013 | 11,685 | 16,208 | 9,448 | 14,505 | | 84,859 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(32,758 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(29,682 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
General and administration expense |
(8,250 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
1,038 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other income from life insurance proceeds |
1,303 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
2,539 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 19,049 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 10,387 | $ | 2,069 | $ | 1,010 | $ | 5,280 | $ | 1,595 | $ | 2,359 | $ | 22,700 | ||||||||
27
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
ITEM 2: | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the notes thereto appearing in Item 1 of this report and the more detailed information contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2008.
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an on-going basis, we evaluate these estimates, including those related to useful lives of real estate assets, cost reimbursement income, bad debts, impairment, contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates.
The discussion that follows is based on our consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the 2008 Quarter and 2008 Period, respectively, and the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, the 2007 Quarter and 2007 Period, respectively.
Forward Looking Statements
We claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for the statements contained herein. The following important factors, in addition to those discussed elsewhere in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K under the caption Risk Factors, could affect our future results and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements: (a) the economic health of our tenants; (b) the economic health of the greater Washington metro region, or other markets we may enter, including the effects of changes in Federal government spending; (c) the supply of competing properties; (d) inflation; (e) consumer confidence; (f) unemployment rates; (g) consumer tastes and preferences; (h) stock price and interest rate fluctuations; (i) our future capital requirements; (j) compliance with applicable laws, including those concerning the environment and access by persons with disabilities; (k) governmental or regulatory actions and initiatives; (l) changes in general economic and business conditions; (m) changes in the capital markets; (n) terrorist attacks or actions; (o) acts of war; (p) weather conditions; (q) the effects of changes in capital available to the technology and biotechnology sectors of the economy, and (r) other factors discussed under the caption Risk Factors. We undertake no obligation to update our forward-looking statements or risk factors to reflect new information, future events, or otherwise.
Overview
Our revenues are derived primarily from the ownership and operation of income-producing real properties in the greater Washington metro region. As of June 30, 2008, we owned a diversified portfolio of 90 properties, consisting of 14 retail centers, 26 general purpose office properties, 17 medical office buildings, 22 industrial/flex properties and 11 multifamily properties, totaling 12.7 million net rentable square feet, and land held for development. We have a fundamental strategy of regional focus, diversification by property type and conservative capital management.
When evaluating our financial condition and operating performance, management focuses on the following financial and non-financial indicators, discussed in further detail herein:
| Net Operating Income (NOI) by segment (Non-GAAP). NOI is calculated as real estate rental revenue less real estate operating expenses. It is a supplemental measure to Net Income. |
| Economic occupancy (or occupancy defined as actual rental revenues recognized for the period indicated as a percentage of gross potential rental revenues for that period), leased percentage (the percentage of available physical net rentable area leased for our commercial segments and percentage of apartment units leased for our multifamily segment) and rental rates. |
| Leasing activity new leases, renewals and expirations. |
| Funds From Operations (FFO), a non GAAP supplemental measure to Net Income. |
28
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
Our results in the second quarter of 2008 as compared to the second quarter of 2007 showed NOI growth in all sectors due to strong rental rate growth offset by a small decrease in overall occupancy. The commercial sectors are benefiting from the NOI contributions of the acquisitions in the last two years. The multifamily NOI was relatively flat due to lower occupancy caused by the fact that two properties were recently completed and are in lease-up. We substantially completed construction at Bennett Park in the fourth quarter of 2007, and began delivering units at The Clayborne in the first quarter of 2008. The two properties were 55% and 36% leased at the end of the 2008 quarter, respectively.
GENERAL
During the first six months of 2008 we completed the following significant transactions:
| The acquisition of one industrial/flex property for $11.2 million, adding approximately 150,000 square feet which was 100% leased at the end of the 2008 Period. |
| The acquisition of one medical office building for $6.5 million, adding approximately 36,000 square feet which was 100% leased at the end of the 2008 Period. The sellers of this property agreed to lease 37% of the buildings space for a period of 12 to 18 months. |
| The sale of two industrial properties for a contract sales price of $41.1 million, resulting in a gain on sale of $15.3 million. |
| An agreement to acquire one medical office property, currently under construction, for $19.5 million. The purchase is expected to occur in the first quarter of 2009 and will add 85,300 square feet of medical office space. |
| The completion of a public offering of 2,600,000 shares of beneficial interest priced at $34.80 per share, raising $86.7 million, net. |
| The execution of three mortgage loans totaling approximately $81 million at a fixed rate of 5.71%, secured by three multifamily properties. |
| The repayment of the $60 million outstanding principal balance under 6.74% 10-year Mandatory Par Put Remarketed Securities (MOPPRS) notes. The total aggregate consideration paid to repurchase the notes was $70.8 million, which amount included the $8.7 million remarketing option value paid to the remarketing dealer and accrued interest paid to the holders. The loss on extinguishment of debt was $8.4 million, net of unamortized loan premium costs, upon settlement of these securities. WRIT refinanced the repurchase of these notes, and refinanced a portion of line outstandings, by issuing a $100 million 2-year term loan, which was swapped for a fixed rate of 4.45%. |
| The exercise of the right to increase the capacity of the unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks led by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association from $200 million to $262 million. |
| The execution of new leases for 470,000 square feet of commercial space, with an average rental rate increase of 18.0%. |
During the first six months of 2007 we completed the following significant transactions:
| The acquisition of two general purpose office properties for $96.4 million adding approximately 278,000 square feet which were 98.7% leased at the end of the 2007 Period, three medical office properties for $103.8 million adding approximately 310,400 square feet which were 96.9% leased at the end of the 2007 Period, and one industrial/flex property for $26.5 million adding approximately 157,000 square feet which was 97.3% leased at the end of the 2007 Period. |
| The issuance of $150.0 million of 3.875% senior unsecured convertible notes due 2026 at an effective yield of 4.003% raising $146.0 million, net. |
| The completion of a public offering of 1,600,000 shares of beneficial interest priced at $37.00 per share raising $57.8 million, net. |
| The opening of a new unsecured revolving credit facility with SunTrust Bank with a committed capacity of $75.0 million and a maturity date of June 29, 2011. |
1 |
feet which was 100% leased at the end of the 2008 Period. The sellers of this property agreed to lease 37% of the buildings space for a period of 12 to 18 months. |
29
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
| The completion of modification to our bond covenants from a restrictive total assets definition to a market based asset definition. |
| The investment of $34.4 million in our development projects. |
| The execution of new leases for 899,600 square feet of commercial space. |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
30
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
Revenue Recognition
Residential properties (our multifamily segment) are leased under operating leases with terms of generally one year or less, and commercial properties (our office, medical office, retail and industrial segments) are leased under operating leases with average terms of three to seven years. We recognize rental income and rental abatements from our residential and commercial leases when earned on a straight-line basis in accordance with SFAS No. 13 Accounting for Leases. Recognition of rental income commences when control of the facility has been given to the tenant. We record a provision for losses on accounts receivable equal to the estimated uncollectible amounts. This estimate is based on our historical experience and a review of the current status of the Companys receivables. Percentage rents, which represent additional rents based on gross tenant sales, are recognized when tenants sales exceed specified thresholds.
In accordance with SFAS No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, sales are recognized at closing only when sufficient down payments have been obtained, possession and other attributes of ownership have been transferred to the buyer and we have no significant continuing involvement.
We recognize cost reimbursement income from pass-through expenses on an accrual basis over the periods in which the expenses were incurred. Pass-through expenses are comprised of real estate taxes, operating expenses and common area maintenance costs which are reimbursed by tenants in accordance with specific allowable costs per tenant lease agreements.
Provision for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable primarily represents amounts accrued and unpaid from tenants in accordance with the terms of the respective leases, subject to our revenue recognition policy. Receivables are reviewed monthly and reserves are established when, in the opinion of management, collection of the receivable is doubtful. In addition to rents due currently, accounts receivable include amounts representing minimal rental income accrued on a straight-line basis to be paid by tenants over the remaining term of their respective leases. Reserves are established for tenants whose rent payment history or financial condition casts doubt upon the tenants ability to perform under its lease obligation.
When the collection of a receivable is deemed doubtful in the same quarter that the receivable was established, then the allowance for that receivable is recognized as an offset to real estate revenues. When a receivable that was established in a prior quarter is deemed doubtful, then the allowance is recognized as an operating expense.
Capital Expenditures
We capitalize those expenditures related to acquiring new assets, significantly increasing the value of an existing asset, or substantially extending the useful life of an existing asset. We also capitalize costs incurred in connection with our development projects, including capitalizing interest during periods in which development projects are in progress. Expenditures necessary to maintain an existing property in ordinary operating condition are expensed as incurred. In addition, we capitalize tenant leasehold improvements when certain conditions are met, including when we supervise construction and will own the improvements.
31
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
Real Estate Assets
Real estate assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives ranging from 28 to 50 years. All capital improvement expenditures associated with replacements, improvements, or major repairs to real property are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 30 years. All tenant improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful life or the term of the lease.
We allocate the purchase price of acquired properties to the related physical assets and in-place leases based on their fair values, based on SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. The fair values of acquired buildings are determined on an as-if-vacant basis considering a variety of factors, including the physical condition and quality of the buildings, estimated rental and absorption rates, estimated future cash flows and valuation assumptions consistent with current market conditions. The as-if-vacant fair value is allocated to land, building and tenant improvements based on property tax assessments and other relevant information obtained in connection with the acquisition of the property.
The fair value of in-place leases consists of the following components (1) the estimated cost to us to replace the leases, including foregone rents during the period of finding a new tenant and foregone recovery of tenant pass-through expenses (referred to as Absorption Cost), (2) the estimated cost of tenant improvements, and other direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant (referred to as Tenant Origination Cost); (3) the estimated leasing commissions associated with obtaining a new tenant (referred to as Leasing Commissions); (4) the above/at/below market cash flow of the leases, determined by comparing the projected cash flows of the leases in place to projected cash flows of comparable market-rate leases (referred to as Net Lease Intangible); and (5) the value, if any, of customer relationships, determined based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenants lease and our overall relationship with the tenant (referred to as Customer Relationship Value).
The amounts used to calculate Net Lease Intangibles are discounted using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired. Tenant Origination Costs are included in Real Estate Assets on our balance sheet and are amortized as depreciation expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the underlying leases. Leasing Commissions and Absorption Costs are classified as Other Assets and are amortized as amortization expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the underlying leases. Net Lease Intangible Assets are classified as Other Assets and are amortized on a straight-line basis as a decrease to Real Estate Rental Revenue over the remaining term of the underlying leases. Net Lease Intangible Liabilities are classified as Other Liabilities and are amortized on a straight-line basis as an increase to Real Estate Rental Revenue over the remaining term of the underlying leases. Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portions of the Tenant Origination Cost, Leasing Commissions, Absorption Costs and Net Lease Intangible associated with that lease are written off to depreciation expense, amortization expense, and rental revenue, respectively. We have attributed no value to Customer Relationship Value as of June 30, 2008 or December 31, 2007.
Impairment Losses on Long-Lived Assets
We recognize impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the net undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets' carrying amount. If such carrying amount is in excess of the estimated cash flows from the operation and disposal of the property, we would recognize an impairment loss equivalent to an amount required to adjust the carrying amount to the estimated fair market value. There were no property impairments recognized during the first six months of 2008 and 2007.
Federal Income Taxes
We believe that we qualify as a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code and intend to continue to qualify as such. To maintain our status as a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our ordinary taxable income to our shareholders. When selling properties, we have the option of (i) reinvesting the sale price of properties sold, allowing for a deferral of income taxes on the sale, (ii) paying out capital gains to the shareholders with no tax to the company or (iii) treating the capital gains as having been distributed to the shareholders, paying the tax on the gain deemed distributed and allocating the tax paid as a credit to the shareholders. In June 2008, two industrial properties, Sullyfield Center and The Earhart Building, were sold for a gain of $15.3 million. The proceeds from the sale are expected to be reinvested in a replacement property.
32
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The discussion that follows is based on our consolidated results of operations for the Quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. The ability to compare one period to another may be significantly affected by acquisitions completed and dispositions made during those periods.
For purposes of evaluating comparative operating performance, we categorize our properties as core, non-core or discontinued operations. A core property is one that was owned for the entirety of the periods being evaluated. A non-core property is one that was acquired during either of the periods being evaluated and is included in continuing operations. Results for properties sold or held for sale during any of the periods evaluated are classified as discontinued operations. One property was acquired during the 2008 Quarter and three properties were acquired during the 2007 Quarter. Four properties were classified as held for sale or sold during the 2008 and 2007 Quarters.
To provide more insight into our operating results, our discussion is divided into two main sections: (1) Consolidated Results of Operations where we provide an overview analysis of results on a consolidated basis and (2) Net Operating Income (NOI) where we provide a detailed analysis of core versus non-core property-level NOI results by segment. NOI is calculated as real estate rental revenue less real estate operating expenses.
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
REAL ESTATE RENTAL REVENUE
Real Estate Rental Revenue for properties classified as continuing operations is summarized as follows (all data in thousands, except percentage amounts):
Quarter Ended June 30, | Period Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Minimum base rent |
$ | 61,551 | $ | 55,856 | $ | 5,695 | 10.2 | % | $ | 122,738 | $ | 108,748 | $ | 13,990 | 12.9 | % | ||||||||||
Recoveries from tenants |
7,855 | 6,362 | 1,493 | 23.5 | % | 15,715 | 12,180 | 3,535 | 29.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Parking and other tenant charges |
362 | 1,037 | (675 | ) | (65.1 | )% | 1,593 | 2,179 | (586 | ) | (26.9 | )% | ||||||||||||||
$ | 69,768 | $ | 63,255 | $ | 6,513 | 10.3 | % | $ | 140,046 | $ | 123,107 | $ | 16,939 | 13.8 | % | |||||||||||
Real estate rental revenue is comprised of (1) minimum base rent, which includes rental revenues recognized on a straight-line basis, (2) revenue from the recovery of operating expenses from our tenants and (3) other revenue such as parking, termination fees and percentage rent.
Minimum base rent increased $5.7 million (10.2%) in the 2008 Quarter compared to the 2007 Quarter primarily due to acquisitions and development properties placed into service in 2007 and 2008. These acquisitions and development properties accounted for $4.7 million of the increase in minimum base rent in the 2008 Quarter over the 2007 Quarter and $0.7 million of the increase in recoveries from tenants. Minimum base rent from core properties in the 2008 Quarter increased $1.0 million over the prior year driven by rental rate growth in all sectors. Minimum base rent increased $14.0 million (12.9%) in the 2008 Period compared to the 2007 Period primarily due to the acquisitions in 2007 and 2008. These acquisitions accounted for $12.0 million of the minimum rent increase and $1.9 million of the increase in recoveries from tenants. Minimum base rent from core properties in the 2008 Period increased by $2.0 million due to rental rate growth in all sectors.
33
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
A summary of consolidated economic occupancy from continuing operations by sector follows:
Quarter Ended June 30, | Period Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
Sector |
2008 | 2007 | Change | 2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||||||
Office Buildings |
94.1 | % | 95.1 | % | (1.0 | )% | 94.8 | % | 94.0 | % | 0.8 | % | ||||||
Medical Office Buildings |
97.2 | % | 96.3 | % | 0.9 | % | 97.5 | % | 97.6 | % | (0.1 | )% | ||||||
Retail Centers |
95.1 | % | 95.0 | % | 0.1 | % | 95.2 | % | 94.8 | % | 0.4 | % | ||||||
Multifamily Properties |
81.0 | % | 90.8 | % | (9.8 | )% | 80.3 | % | 90.7 | % | (10.4 | )% | ||||||
Industrial/Flex Centers |
93.3 | % | 94.9 | % | (1.6 | )% | 93.9 | % | 95.0 | % | (1.1 | )% | ||||||
Total |
92.4 | % | 94.6 | % | (2.2 | )% | 92.7 | % | 94.2 | % | (1.5 | )% | ||||||
Economic occupancy represents actual rental revenues recognized for the period indicated as a percentage of gross potential rental revenues for that period. Percentage rents and expense reimbursements are not considered in computing economic occupancy percentages.
Our overall consolidated economic occupancy decreased 220 basis points for the 2008 Quarter over the 2007 Quarter. The overall decrease was driven by the multifamily sector, which decreased by 980 basis points due to the multifamily development properties, Bennett Park and Clayborne, being placed into service during fourth quarter 2007 and first quarter 2008. The properties are in lease-up and were 55% and 36% leased, respectively, as of the end of the 2008 Quarter. Occupancy in the office sector decreased by 100 basis points due to vacated space at Lexington and 2000 M Street. Industrial sector occupancy decreased by 160 basis points due vacated space at Tech 100, Ammendale Technology Park and 270 Tech Park. Occupancy in the retail sector was flat, while the Medical Office sector improved by 90 basis points due to leasing activity at 2440 M Street.
Consolidated economic occupancy was 92.7% for the 2008 Period, a decrease of 150 basis points compared to the 2007 Period. Occupancy at the various sectors was impacted by the activity in the second quarter, discussed above.
REAL ESTATE OPERATING EXPENSES
Real estate operating expenses, for properties classified as continuing operations, are summarized as follows (all data in thousands, except percentage amounts):
Quarter Ended June 30, | Period Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Change | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses |
$ | 15,936 | $ | 14,195 | $ | 1,741 | 12.3 | % | $ | 32,475 | $ | 27,824 | $ | 4,651 | 16.7 | % | ||||||||
Real estate taxes |
6,867 | 5,347 | 1,520 | 28.4 | % | 13,461 | 10,424 | 3,037 | 29.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
$ | 22,803 | $ | 19,542 | $ | 3,261 | 16.7 | % | $ | 45,936 | $ | 38,248 | $ | 7,688 | 20.1 | % | |||||||||
Property operating expenses include utilities, repairs and maintenance, property administration and management, operating services, common area maintenance and other operating expenses.
Real estate operating expenses were 32.7% of revenue in the 2008 Quarter and 30.9% of the revenue in the 2007 Quarter. The properties acquired or placed into service in 2007 and 2008 accounted for a $2.0 million increase in property operating expenses, offset by a $0.3 million decrease for core properties. The properties acquired or placed into service in 2007 and 2008 also accounted for $0.9 million of the $1.5 million increase real estate taxes. The $0.6 million increase in real estate taxes for core properties was due to higher property assessments across the portfolio.
Real estate operating expenses were 32.8% of revenue for the 2008 Period and 31.1% of revenue for the 2007 Period. The properties acquired or placed into service in 2007 and 2008 accounted for all of the $4.7 million increase in property operating expenses and $2.1 million (70.0%) of the $3.0 million increase in real estate taxes over the 2007 Period. Real estate taxes increased due to higher assessments across the portfolio.
34
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES
Other operating expenses are summarized as follows (all data in thousands, except percentage amounts):
Quarter Ended June 30, | Period Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation & amortization |
$ | 21,198 | $ | 16,632 | $ | 4,566 | 27.5 | % | $ | 41,723 | $ | 32,758 | $ | 8,965 | 27.4 | % | ||||||||||
Interest expense |
17,582 | 15,298 | 2,284 | 14.9 | % | 35,246 | 29,682 | 5,564 | 18.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| | | | 8,449 | | 8,449 | | ||||||||||||||||||
General & administrative |
3,111 | 5,367 | (2,256 | ) | (42.0 | )% | 6,191 | 8,250 | (2,059 | ) | (25.0 | )% | ||||||||||||||
$ | 41,891 | $ | 37,297 | $ | 4,594 | 12.3 | % | $ | 91,609 | $ | 70,690 | $ | 20,919 | 29.6 | % | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $4.6 million (27.5%) to $21.2 million in the 2008 Quarter from $16.6 million in the 2007 Quarter and $8.9 million (27.4%) to $41.7 million in the 2008 Period from $32.8 million in the 2007 Period due primarily to acquisitions, development properties placed into service, capital expenditures and tenant improvements.
General and administrative expenses decreased by $2.3 million and $2.1 million in the 2008 Quarter and Period, respectively. This decrease is due primarily to a bondholder consent solicitation fee and the full amortization of equity compensation for the retired CEO in the 2007 Quarter.
The loss on extinguishment of debt is a non-recurring charge associated with the refinancing of $60 million of 10-year Mandatory Par Put Remarketed Securities (MOPPRS) with a $100 million 2-year term loan in February 2008. WRIT entered into a $100 million unsecured term loan which was swapped for a fixed rate of 4.45% to refinance the extinguished debt.
Interest expense increased $2.3 million and $5.5 million in the 2008 Quarter and Period, respectively. The increase is primarily due to 2007 and 2008 acquisitions, which were partially funded by debt. Mortgage interest also increased $0.7 million for the 2008 Quarter and $0.9 million for the 2008 Period due to the mortgage assumptions for some acquisitions in 2007 and three new mortgages on multifamily properties in the 2008 Quarter. Capitalized interest decreased due to placing into service the multifamily development projects in fourth quarter 2007 and first quarter 2008.
A summary of interest expense for the Quarter and Period ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, appears below (in millions):
Quarter Ended June 30, | Period Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||
Debt Type |
2008 | 2007 | $ Change | 2008 | 2007 | $ Change | ||||||||||||||||
Notes payable |
$ | 12.0 | $ | 11.9 | $ | 0.1 | $ | 24.0 | $ | 23.3 | $ | 0.7 | ||||||||||
Mortgages |
4.2 | 3.5 | 0.7 | 7.8 | 6.9 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||||
Lines of credit |
2.1 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 4.8 | 2.4 | 2.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Capitalized interest |
(0.7 | ) | (1.6 | ) | 0.9 | (1.4 | ) | (2.9 | ) | 1.5 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 17.6 | $ | 15.3 | $ | 2.3 | $ | 35.2 | $ | 29.7 | $ | 5.5 | ||||||||||
OTHER INCOME
In March 2007, upon the death of a retired executive officer, the Company, as beneficiary on a life insurance policy, recognized proceeds of $1.3 million in excess of cash surrender value, which has been reported as other income in the financial statements for the 2007 Period.
35
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
We dispose of assets that are inconsistent with our long-term strategic or return objectives and where market conditions for sale are favorable. The proceeds from the sales are reinvested into other properties, used to fund development operations, support corporate needs, or distributed to our shareholders.
We sold two properties in 2007 and two properties in the 2008 Quarter. Maryland Trade Centers I and II were classified as held for sale as of March 31, 2007 and sold as of September 26, 2007. They were sold for a contract sales price of $58.0 million, and we recognized a gain on disposal of $25.0 million, in accordance with SFAS No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate. $15.3 million of the proceeds from the disposition was used to fund the purchase of CentreMed I & II on August 16, 2007 in a reverse tax free property exchange, and $40.1 million of the proceeds from the disposition were escrowed in a tax free property exchange account and subsequently used to fund a portion of the purchase price of 2000 M Street on December 4, 2007.
Sullyfield Center and The Earhart Building were classified as held for sale in November 2007 and sold in June 2008. They were sold for a contract sales price of $41.1 million, and we recognized a gain on sale of $15.3 million, in accordance with SFAS No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate. The proceeds from the sale were escrowed into a tax free property exchange account intended to be used for the acquisition of a new property.
Operating results of the properties classified as discontinued operations for the 2008 and 2007 Quarters and Periods are summarized as follows (in thousands):
Quarter ended June 30, | Period ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ Change | 2008 | 2007 | $ Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 832 | $ | 2,777 | $ | (1,945 | ) | $ | 1,930 | $ | 5,519 | $ | (3,589 | ) | ||||||||||
Property expenses |
(193 | ) | (1,028 | ) | 835 | (444 | ) | (2,083 | ) | 1,639 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| (248 | ) | 248 | | (897 | ) | 897 | ||||||||||||||||
$ | 639 | $ | 1,501 | $ | (862 | ) | $ | 1,486 | $ | 2,539 | $ | (1,053 | ) | |||||||||||
NET OPERATING INCOME
Real estate NOI is one of the key performance measures we use to assess the results of our operations at the property level. We provide NOI as a supplement to net income calculated in accordance with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). NOI does not represent net income calculated in accordance with GAAP. As such, it should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our operating performance. NOI is calculated as net income, less non-real estate (other) revenue, plus interest expense, depreciation and amortization and general and administrative expenses. A reconciliation of NOI to net income is provided below.
36
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
2008 Quarter Compared to the 2007 Quarter
The following tables of selected consolidated operating data provide the basis for our discussion of NOI in the 2008 Quarter compared to the 2007 Quarter. All amounts are in thousands except percentage amounts.
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Real Estate Rental Revenue |
||||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 63,472 | $ | 62,551 | $ | 921 | 1.5 | % | ||||||
Non-core (1) |
6,296 | 704 | 5,592 | 794.3 | % | |||||||||
Total Real Estate Rental Revenue |
$ | 69,768 | $ | 63,255 | $ | 6,513 | 10.3 | % | ||||||
Real Estate Expenses |
||||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 19,546 | $ | 19,203 | $ | 343 | 1.8 | % | ||||||
Non-core (1) |
3,257 | 339 | 2,918 | 860.8 | % | |||||||||
Total Real Estate Expenses |
$ | 22,803 | $ | 19,542 | $ | 3,261 | 16.7 | % | ||||||
Net Operating Income |
||||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 43,926 | $ | 43,348 | $ | 578 | 1.3 | % | ||||||
Non-core (1) |
3,039 | 365 | 2,674 | 732.6 | % | |||||||||
Total Net Operating Income |
$ | 46,965 | $ | 43,713 | $ | 3,252 | 7.4 | % | ||||||
Reconciliation to Net Income |
||||||||||||||
NOI |
$ | 46,965 | $ | 43,713 | ||||||||||
Other income |
220 | 420 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(17,582 | ) | (15,298 | ) | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(21,198 | ) | (16,632 | ) | ||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
(3,111 | ) | (5,367 | ) | ||||||||||
Other income life insurance proceeds |
| | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate |
15,275 | | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations(2) |
639 | 1,501 | ||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 21,208 | $ | 8,337 | ||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||
Economic Occupancy |
||||||
Core |
94.8 | % | 94.5 | % | ||
Non-core (1) |
72.2 | % | 97.6 | % | ||
Total |
92.4 | % | 94.6 | % | ||
(1) |
Non-core properties include: |
2008 acquisitions 6100 Columbia Park Road and Sterling MOB
2007 acquisitions Woodholme Medical Office Building, Woodholme Center, Ashburn Farm Office Park, CentreMed and 2000 M Street
2008 and 2007 in development Bennett Park, Clayborne Apartments and Dulles Station
(2) |
Discontinued operations include income from operations for: |
2008 and 2007 Quarter sold properties Sullyfield Center, The Earhart Building and Maryland Trade Centers I & II
We recognized NOI of $47.0 million in the 2008 Quarter, which was $3.3 million or 7.4% greater than in the 2007 Quarter due primarily to our acquisitions in 2007 and 2008. The non-core properties contributed $3.0 million in NOI in the 2008 Quarter (6.4% of total NOI).
Core properties experienced a $0.6 million increase (1.3%) in NOI due to a $0.9 million increase in revenue offset by a $0.3 million increase in property expenses. Real estate revenue benefited from increased rental rates. The increase in core expenses was driven by higher real estate taxes in the all sectors due to higher property assessments.
37
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
Overall economic occupancy decreased from 94.6% in the 2007 Quarter to 92.4% in the 2008 Quarter as non-core economic occupancy decreased from 97.6% to 72.2%, because the newly-developed Bennett Park and Clayborne were placed into service and are in the initial lease-up phase. As of June 30, 2008, 11.9% of the total commercial square footage leased is scheduled to expire in the next twelve months. During the 2008 Quarter we executed new leases for 473,200 square feet at an average rental rate increase of 18.0%. An analysis of NOI by sector follows.
Office Sector
Three Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||
Real Estate Rental Revenue |
|||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 25,550 | $ | 25,532 | $ | 18 | 0.1 | % | |||||
Non-core (1) |
3,167 | 176 | 2,991 | 1,699.4 | % | ||||||||
Total Real Estate Rental Revenue |
$ | 28,717 | $ | 25,708 | $ | 3,009 | 11.7 | % | |||||
Real Estate Expenses |
|||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 8,183 | $ | 8,477 | $ | (294 | ) | (3.5 | )% | ||||
Non-core (1) |
1,627 | 61 | 1,566 | 2,567.2 | % | ||||||||
Total Real Estate Expenses |
$ | 9,810 | $ | 8,538 | $ | 1,272 | 14.9 | % | |||||
Net Operating Income |
|||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 17,367 | $ | 17,055 | $ | 312 | 1.8 | % | |||||
Non-core (1) |
1,540 | 115 | 1,425 | 1,239.1 | % | ||||||||
Total Net Operating Income |
$ | 18,907 | $ | 17,170 | $ | 1,737 | 10.1 | % | |||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||
Economic Occupancy |
||||||
Core |
94.8 | % | 95.1 | % | ||
Non-core (1) |
87.8 | % | 95.6 | % | ||
Total |
94.1 | % | 95.1 | % | ||
(1) |
Non-core properties include: |
2008 and 2007 in development Dulles Station
2007 acquisitions Woodholme Center and 2000 M Street
The office sector recognized NOI of $18.9 million in the 2008 Quarter, which was $1.7 million or 10.1% higher than in the 2007 Quarter due primarily to the NOI contribution of the properties acquired in 2007. Those properties contributed $1.4 million to the increase in NOI. Core office sector NOI was $0.3 million (1.8%) higher than in the comparable quarter in 2007 due to higher rental rates offset by lower occupancy.
Core economic occupancy decreased to 94.8% from 95.1% as a result of tenants vacating at Lexington and One Central Plaza.
As of June 30, 2008, 9.4% of the total office square footage leased is scheduled to expire in the next twelve months. We executed new leases for 167,800 square feet of office space with a 14.3% increase in rental rates.
38
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
Medical Office Sector
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||
Real Estate Rental Revenue |
||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 8,759 | $ | 8,543 | $ | 216 | 2.5 | % | ||||
Non-core(1) |
2,109 | 528 | 1,581 | 299.4 | % | |||||||
Total Real Estate Rental Revenue |
$ | 10,868 | $ | 9,071 | $ | 1,797 | 19.8 | % | ||||
Real Estate Expenses |
||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 2,729 | $ | 2,606 | $ | 123 | 4.7 | % | ||||
Non-core(1) |
710 | 170 | 540 | 317.6 | % | |||||||
Total Real Estate Expenses |
$ | 3,439 | $ | 2,776 | $ | 663 | 23.9 | % | ||||
Net Operating Income |
||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 6,030 | $ | 5,937 | $ | 93 | 1.6 | % | ||||
Non-core(1) |
1,399 | 358 | 1,041 | 290.8 | % | |||||||
Total Net Operating Income |
$ | 7,429 | $ | 6,295 | $ | 1,134 | 18.0 | % | ||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||
Economic Occupancy |
||||||
Core |
97.6 | % | 96.2 | % | ||
Non-core (1) |
95.8 | % | 98.3 | % | ||
Total |
97.2 | % | 96.3 | % | ||
(1) |
Non-core properties include: |
2008 acquisition Sterling MOB
2007 acquisitions Woodholme Medical Office Building, Ashburn Farm Office Park and CentreMed
The medical office sector recognized NOI of $7.4 million in the 2008 Quarter which was $1.1 million or 18.0% higher than the 2007 Quarter due to the properties acquired in 2007 and 2008. The acquired properties contributed $1.0 million to the increase in NOI. Core medical office sector NOI increased $0.1 million due to higher occupancy.
Core economic occupancy increased 140 basis points in the 2008 Quarter as compared to the 2007 Quarter. As of June 30, 2008, 9.9% of the total medical office square footage leased is scheduled to expire in the next twelve months. We executed new leases for 47,700 square feet of medical office space with a 28.2% increase in rental rates.
39
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
Retail Sector
Three Months June 30, | ||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||
Real Estate Rental Revenue |
||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 10,341 | $ | 10,064 | $ | 277 | 2.8 | % | ||||
Real Estate Expenses |
||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,411 | $ | 2,291 | $ | 120 | 5.2 | % | ||||
Net Operating Income |
||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 7,930 | $ | 7,773 | $ | 157 | 2.0 | % | ||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||
Economic Occupancy |
||||||
Total |
95.1 | % | 95.0 | % |
Retail sector NOI increased slightly in the 2008 Quarter from the 2007 Quarter due to higher rental rates.
As of June 30, 2008, 13.5% of the total retail square footage leased is scheduled to expire in the next twelve months. We executed new leases for 59,200 square feet of retail space at an average rent increase of 28.3%.
40
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
Multifamily Sector
Three Months Ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||
Real Estate Rental Revenue |
|||||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 8,884 | $ | 8,430 | $ | 454 | 5.4 | % | |||||||
Non-core (1) |
681 | | 681 | | |||||||||||
Total Real Estate Rental Revenue |
$ | 9,565 | $ | 8,430 | $ | 1,135 | 13.5 | % | |||||||
Real Estate Expenses |
|||||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 3,780 | $ | 3,429 | $ | 351 | 10.2 | % | |||||||
Non-core (1) |
812 | 108 | 704 | 651.9 | % | ||||||||||
Total Real Estate Expenses |
$ | 4,592 | $ | 3,537 | $ | 1,055 | 29.8 | % | |||||||
Net Operating Income |
|||||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 5,104 | $ | 5,001 | $ | 103 | 2.1 | % | |||||||
Non-core (1) |
(131 | ) | (108 | ) | (23 | ) | 21.3 | % | |||||||
Total Net Operating Income |
$ | 4,973 | $ | 4,893 | $ | 80 | 1.6 | % | |||||||
Three Months Ended June 30 | ||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||
Economic Occupancy |
||||||
Core |
93.3 | % | 90.8 | % | ||
Non-core (1) |
29.1 | % | N/A | |||
Total |
81.0 | % | 90.8 | % | ||
(1) |
Non-core properties include: |
2008 and 2007 in development Bennett Park and Clayborne Apartments
Multifamily NOI was flat. Core revenues were higher in the 2008 Quarter due to increased occupancy and rental rate growth.
Occupancy decreased by 980 basis points compared to the 2007 Quarter because the newly-developed Bennett Park and Clayborne were placed into service in fourth quarter 2007 and first quarter 2008, respectively, and are in the initial lease-up phase. Bennett Park was 55% leased and Clayborne was 36% leased at the end of the 2008 Quarter.
41
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
Industrial Sector
Three Months Ended June 30 | |||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||
Real Estate Rental Revenue |
|||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 9,938 | $ | 9,982 | $ | (44 | ) | (0.4 | )% | ||||
Non-core (1) |
339 | | 339 | | |||||||||
Total Real Estate Rental Revenue |
$ | 10,277 | $ | 9,982 | $ | 295 | 3.0 | % | |||||
Real Estate Expenses |
|||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 2,443 | $ | 2,400 | $ | 43 | 1.8 | % | |||||
Non-core (1) |
108 | | 108 | | |||||||||
Total Real Estate Expenses |
$ | 2,551 | $ | 2,400 | $ | 151 | 6.3 | % | |||||
Net Operating Income |
|||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 7,495 | $ | 7,582 | $ | (87 | ) | (1.1 | )% | ||||
Non-core (1) |
231 | | 231 | | |||||||||
Total Net Operating Income |
$ | 7,726 | $ | 7,582 | $ | 144 | 1.9 | % | |||||
Three Months Ended June 30 | ||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||
Economic Occupancy |
||||||
Core |
93.4 | % | 94.9 | % | ||
Non-core (1) |
88.2 | % | N/A | |||
Total |
93.3 | % | 94.9 | % | ||
(1) |
Non-core properties include: |
2008 acquisition 6100 Columbia Park Road
The industrial sector recognized NOI of $7.7 million in the 2008 Quarter, which was $0.1 million (1.9%) greater than in the 2007 Quarter due to the 2008 acquisition. Core NOI decreased by $0.1 million due to lower occupancy offset by higher rental rates.
Core economic occupancy decreased by 150 basis points for the 2008 Quarter as compared to the 2007 Quarter. As of June 30, 2008, 14.3% of the total industrial square footage leased is scheduled to expire in the next twelve months. We executed new leases for 198,600 square feet of industrial space at an average rent increase of 11.3%.
42
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
2008 Period Compared to the 2007 Period
The following tables of selected consolidated operating data provide the basis for our discussion of NOI in the 2008 Period compared to the 2007 Period. All amounts are in thousands except percentage amounts.
Period Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Real Estate Rental Revenue |
||||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 119,769 | $ | 117,320 | $ | 2,449 | 2.1 | % | ||||||
Non-core (1) |
20,277 | 5,787 | 14,490 | 250.4 | % | |||||||||
Total Real Estate Rental Revenue |
$ | 140,046 | $ | 123,107 | $ | 16,939 | 13.8 | % | ||||||
Real Estate Expenses |
||||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 37,294 | $ | 36,521 | $ | 773 | 2.1 | % | ||||||
Non-core (1) |
8,642 | 1,727 | 6,915 | 400.4 | % | |||||||||
Total Real Estate Expenses |
$ | 45,936 | $ | 38,248 | $ | 7,688 | 20.1 | % | ||||||
Net Operating Income |
||||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 82,475 | $ | 80,799 | $ | 1,676 | 2.1 | % | ||||||
Non-core (1) |
11,635 | 4,060 | 7,575 | 186.6 | % | |||||||||
Total Net Operating Income |
$ | 94,110 | $ | 84,859 | $ | 9,251 | 10.9 | % | ||||||
Reconciliation to Net Income |
||||||||||||||
NOI |
$ | 94,110 | $ | 84,859 | ||||||||||
Other income |
458 | 1,038 | ||||||||||||
Other income from life insurance proceeds |
| 1,303 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(35,246 | ) | (29,682 | ) | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(41,723 | ) | (32,758 | ) | ||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
(6,191 | ) | (8,250 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
(8,449 | ) | | |||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate |
15,275 | | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations(2) |
1,486 | 2,539 | ||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 19,720 | $ | 19,049 | ||||||||||
Period Ended June 30, | ||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||
Economic Occupancy |
||||||
Core |
95.0 | % | 94.2 | % | ||
Non-core (1) |
80.0 | % | 95.1 | % | ||
Total |
92.7 | % | 94.2 | % | ||
(1) |
Non-core properties include: |
2008 acquisitions 6100 Columbia Park Road and Sterling MOB
2007 acquisitions 270 Technology Park, Monument II, 2440 M Street, Woodholme Medical Office Building, Woodholme Center, Ashburn Farm Office Park, CentreMed and 2000 M Street
2008 and 2007 in development Bennett Park, Clayborne Apartments and Dulles Station
(2) |
Discontinued operations include income from operations for: |
2008 and 2007 sold properties Sullyfield Center, The Earhart Building, and Maryland Trade Centers I & II
We recognized NOI of $94.1 million in the 2008 Period, which was $9.3 million or 10.9% greater than in the 2007 Period due primarily to our acquisitions in 2007 and 2008. These acquired properties contributed $7.6 million, or 81.7%, of the increase in total NOI.
Core properties experienced a $1.7 million increase (2.1%) in NOI due to a $2.5 million increase in revenue offset somewhat by a $0.8 million increase in property expenses. Real estate revenue benefited from increased occupancy in the office, multifamily and retail sectors, as well as increased rental rates in all sectors. The increase in core expenses was due to increased real estate taxes caused by higher property assessments across the portfolio.
43
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
Overall economic occupancy decreased from 94.2% in the 2007 Period to 92.7% in the 2008 Period as non-core occupancy decreased. The lower non-core occupancy is due to placing the in development multifamily properties, Bennett Park and Clayborne, into service in fourth quarter 2007 and first quarter 2008, respectively. Core economic occupancy increased from 94.2% to 95.0%, due to increases in the office, retail and multifamily sectors, offset somewhat by decreases in core industrial and medical office sector occupancy. As of June 30, 2008, 11.9% of the total commercial square footage leased is scheduled to expire in the next twelve months. During the 2008 Period we executed new leases for 742,800 square feet with a 17.3% increase in rental rates. An analysis of NOI by sector follows.
Office Sector
Period Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||
Real Estate Rental Revenue |
||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 47,782 | $ | 46,835 | $ | 947 | 2.0 | % | ||||
Non-core (1) |
10,637 | 2,712 | 7,925 | 292.2 | % | |||||||
Total Real Estate Rental Revenue |
$ | 58,419 | $ | 49,547 | $ | 8,872 | 17.9 | % | ||||
Real Estate Expenses |
||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 16,043 | $ | 15,874 | $ | 169 | 1.1 | % | ||||
Non-core (1) |
4,312 | 660 | 3,652 | 553.3 | % | |||||||
Total Real Estate Expenses |
$ | 20,355 | $ | 16,534 | $ | 3,821 | 23.1 | % | ||||
Net Operating Income |
||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 31,739 | $ | 30,961 | $ | 778 | 2.5 | % | ||||
Non-core (1) |
6,325 | 2,052 | 4,273 | 208.2 | % | |||||||
Total Net Operating Income |
$ | 38,064 | $ | 33,013 | $ | 5,051 | 15.3 | % | ||||
Period Ended June 30, | ||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||
Economic Occupancy |
||||||
Core |
95.0 | % | 93.7 | % | ||
Non-core (1) |
93.7 | % | 99.7 | % | ||
Total |
94.8 | % | 94.0 | % | ||
(1) |
Non-core properties include: |
2008 and 2007 in development Dulles Station
2007 acquisitions Monument II, Woodholme Center and 2000 M Street
The office sector recognized NOI of $38.1 million in the 2008 Period, which was $5.1 million, or 15.3%, higher than in the 2007 Period due primarily to the NOI contribution of the properties acquired in 2007. Those properties contributed $4.3 million, or 84.3%, to the increase in total office sector NOI. Core office sector NOI was $0.8 million (2.5%) higher than in the comparable period in 2007 due primarily to increased occupancy and rental rates.
The core office rental revenue increased compared to the 2007 Period as rental rates increased 0.9% and occupancy increased 130 basis points. This occupancy increase was driven by the leasing activity at Wayne Plaza, 7900 Westpark and West Gude.
Non-core economic occupancy decreased by 600 basis points, mainly due to vacated space at 2000 M Street.
As of June 30, 2008, 9.4% of the total office square footage leased is scheduled to expire in the next twelve months. During the 2008 Period we executed new leases for 318,000 square feet of office space with a 16.3% increase in rental rates.
44
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
Medical Office Sector
Period Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||
Real Estate Rental Revenue |
|||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 14,791 | $ | 14,750 | $ | 41 | 0.3 | % | |||||
Non-core(1) |
6,811 | 2,022 | 4,789 | 236.8 | % | ||||||||
Total Real Estate Rental Revenue |
$ | 21,602 | $ | 16,772 | $ | 4,830 | 28.8 | % | |||||
Real Estate Expenses |
|||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 4,486 | $ | 4,384 | $ | 102 | 2.3 | % | |||||
Non-core(1) |
2,463 | 703 | 1,760 | 250.4 | % | ||||||||
Total Real Estate Expenses |
$ | 6,949 | $ | 5,087 | $ | 1,862 | 36.6 | % | |||||
Net Operating Income |
|||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 10,305 | $ | 10,366 | $ | (61 | ) | (0.6 | )% | ||||
Non-core(1) |
4,348 | 1,319 | 3,029 | 229.6 | % | ||||||||
Total Net Operating Income |
$ | 14,653 | $ | 11,685 | $ | 2,968 | 25.4 | % | |||||
Period Ended June 30, | ||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||
Economic Occupancy |
||||||
Core |
98.4 | % | 99.0 | % | ||
Non-core (1) |
95.7 | % | 87.5 | % | ||
Total |
97.5 | % | 97.6 | % | ||
(1) |
Non-core properties include: |
2008 acquisition Sterling MOB
2007 acquisitions 2440 M Street, Woodholme Medical Office Building, Ashburn Farm Office Park and CentreMed
The medical office sector recognized NOI of $14.7 million in the 2008 Period which was $3.0 million, or 25.4%, higher than the 2007 Period due to the properties acquired in 2007 and 2008. The acquired properties contributed all of the increase in NOI.
Core economic occupancy decreased 60 basis points in the 2008 period compared to the 2007 Period. As of June 30, 2008, 9.9% of the total medical office square footage leased is scheduled to expire in the next twelve months. During the 2008 Period we executed new leases for 60,400 square feet of medical office space with a 26.0% increase in rental rates.
45
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
Retail Sector
Period Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||
Real Estate Rental Revenue |
||||||||||||
Core/Total |
$ | 20,987 | $ | 20,753 | $ | 234 | 1.1 | % | ||||
Real Estate Expenses |
||||||||||||
Core/Total |
$ | 4,683 | $ | 4,545 | $ | 138 | 3.0 | % | ||||
Net Operating Income |
||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 16,304 | $ | 16,208 | $ | 96 | 0.6 | % |
Period Ended June 30, | ||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||
Economic Occupancy |
||||||
Core |
95.2 | % | 94.8 | % |
Retail sector NOI remained relatively flat in the 2008 Period compared to the 2007 Period. The increase in rental revenue of $0.2 million was due to higher occupancy. Real estate expenses increased by $0.1 million due to higher real estate taxes caused by higher property assessments.
Economic occupancy increased by 40 basis points. As of June 30, 2008, 13.5% of the total retail square footage leased is scheduled to expire in the next twelve months. During the 2008 Period we executed new leases for 76,600 square feet of retail space at an average rent increase of 26.8%.
46
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
Multifamily Sector
Period Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||
Real Estate Rental Revenue |
|||||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 17,319 | $ | 16,603 | $ | 716 | 4.3 | % | |||||||
Non-core (1) |
1,060 | | 1,060 | | |||||||||||
Total Real Estate Rental Revenue |
$ | 18,379 | $ | 16,603 | $ | 1,776 | 10.7 | % | |||||||
Real Estate Expenses |
|||||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 7,417 | $ | 7,046 | $ | 371 | 5.3 | % | |||||||
Non-core (1) |
1,420 | 109 | 1,311 | 1,202.8 | % | ||||||||||
Total Real Estate Expenses |
$ | 8,837 | $ | 7,155 | $ | 1,682 | 23.5 | % | |||||||
Net Operating Income |
|||||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 9,902 | $ | 9,557 | $ | 345 | 3.6 | % | |||||||
Non-core (1) |
(360 | ) | (109 | ) | (251 | ) | 230.3 | % | |||||||
Total Net Operating Income |
$ | 9,542 | $ | 9,448 | $ | 94 | 1.0 | % | |||||||
Period Ended June 30, | ||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||
Economic Occupancy |
||||||
Core |
93.0 | % | 90.7 | % | ||
Non-core (1) |
23.8 | % | N/A | |||
Total |
80.3 | % | 90.7 | % | ||
(1) |
Non-core properties include: |
2008 and 2007 in development Bennett Park and Clayborne Apartments
Multifamily NOI was flat due to a $1.1 million increase in non-core revenue offset by a $1.3 million increase in non-core expenses related to the two development properties, Bennett Park and Clayborne, being placed into service in fourth quarter 2007 and first quarter 2008, respectively. The properties are in lease-up and were 55% and 36% leased, respectively, as of the end of the 2008 Period. Core NOI increased by $0.3 million due to an increase in core occupancy.
47
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
Industrial Sector
Period Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||
Real Estate Rental Revenue |
|||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 18,890 | $ | 18,379 | $ | 511 | 2.8 | % | |||||
Non-core (1) |
1,769 | 1,053 | 716 | 68.0 | % | ||||||||
Total Real Estate Rental Revenue |
$ | 20,659 | $ | 19,432 | $ | 1,227 | 6.3 | % | |||||
Real Estate Expenses |
|||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 4,665 | $ | 4,672 | $ | (7 | ) | (0.1 | )% | ||||
Non-core (1) |
447 | 255 | 192 | 75.3 | % | ||||||||
Total Real Estate Expenses |
$ | 5,112 | $ | 4,927 | $ | 185 | 3.7 | % | |||||
Net Operating Income |
|||||||||||||
Core |
$ | 14,225 | $ | 13,707 | $ | 518 | 3.8 | % | |||||
Non-core (1) |
1,322 | 798 | 524 | 65.7 | % | ||||||||
Total Net Operating Income |
$ | 15,547 | $ | 14,505 | $ | 1,042 | 7.2 | % | |||||
Period Ended June 30, | ||||||
Economic Occupancy |
2008 | 2007 | ||||
Core |
94.3 | % | 94.9 | % | ||
Non-core (1) |
89.0 | % | 97.7 | % | ||
Total |
93.9 | % | 95.0 | % | ||
(1) |
Non-core properties include: |
2008 acquisition 6100 Columbia Park Road
2007 acquisition 270 Technology Park
The industrial sector recognized NOI of $15.5 million in the 2008 Period, which was $1.0 million (7.2 %) greater than in the 2007 Period due to the acquisitions of 270 Technology Park in February 2007 and 6100 Columbia Park Road in February 2008.
Core property NOI increased by $0.5 million, or 3.8%, in the 2008 Period from the 2007 Period due to a $0.5 million increase in revenue caused by higher rental rates.
Overall economic occupancy decreased by 110 basis points. As of June 30, 2008, 14.3% of the total industrial square footage leased is scheduled to expire in the next twelve months. During the 2008 Period we executed new leases for 287,600 square feet of industrial space at an average rent increase of 9.9%.
48
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash from our real estate operations and our unsecured credit facilities. As of June 30, 2008, we had approximately $12.7 million in cash and cash equivalents and $306.6 million available for borrowing under our unsecured credit facilities.
In January 2008, WRIT exercised a portion of the accordion feature on one of its unsecured revolving credit facilities. WRITs total borrowing capacity was increased to $337 million at a rate of LIBOR plus 0.425%. In February 2008, WRIT completed an extinguishment of debt on $60 million of 10-year Mandatory Par Put Remarketed Securities (MOPPRS). WRIT issued a $100 million 2-year term loan, which was swapped for a fixed rate of 4.45% to refinance the 6.74% debt. Also, $18.0 million under our unsecured credit facilities was repaid using the proceeds of the $100 million term loan. There were no new advances under the unsecured credit facilities during the 2008 Period.
In May 2008 we completed a public offering of 2,600,000 shares of beneficial interest priced at $34.80 per share, raising $86.7 million, net. The proceeds were used to pay down borrowings under lines of credit.
Also in May 2008, we executed three mortgage loans totaling approximately $81 million at a fixed rate of 5.71%, secured by three multifamily properties. The proceeds were used to repay borrowings under lines of credit.
We derive substantially all of our revenue from tenants under leases at our properties. Our operating cash flow therefore depends materially on our ability to lease our properties to tenants, the rents that we are able to charge to our tenants, and the ability of these tenants to make their rental payments.
Our primary uses of cash are to fund distributions to shareholders, to fund capital investments in our existing portfolio of operating assets, to fund new acquisitions, redevelopment and ground-up development activities and to fund operating and administrative expenses. As a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our taxable income to our shareholders on an annual basis. We also regularly require capital to invest in our existing portfolio of operating assets in connection with large-scale renovations, routine capital improvements, deferred maintenance on properties we have recently acquired, and our leasing activities, including funding tenant improvement allowances and leasing commissions. The amounts of the leasing-related expenditures can vary significantly depending on negotiations with tenants and the current competitive leasing environment.
As we review the results of the first six months and anticipate the business activity for the remainder of 2008, we expect to complete (he year with significant capital requirements. For the twelve months ended December 31,2008, total anticipated costs are as follows:
| Funding dividends on our common shares and minority interest distributions to third party unit holders; |
| Approximately $40.0 million to invest in our existing portfolio of operating assets, including approximately $14.0 million to fund tenant-related capital requirements; |
| Approximately $15.4 million to invest in our development projects; |
| Approximately $200 million to fund our expected property acquisitions, less $40.2 million of net proceeds held escrowed in a tax free property exchange account and less a $102 million mortgage that is expected to be assumed; |
| In the first quarter of 2008, $8.7 million was used to fund a non-recurring charge, resulting from an extinguishment of debt on $60 million on 10-year Mandatory Par Put Remarketed Securities (MOPPRS); |
We expect to meet our capital requirements using cash generated by our real estate operations and through borrowings on our unsecured credit facilities, additional debt or equity capital raised in the public markets, possible asset dispositions or funding through property-specific mortgage debt.
We believe that we will generate sufficient cash flow from operations and have access to the capital resources necessary to fund our requirements. However, as a result of general, greater Washington metro regional, or tenant economic downturns, unfavorable changes in the supply of competing properties, changes in the capital markets or our properties not performing as expected, we may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations or otherwise have access to capital on favorable terms, or
49
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
at all. If we are unable to obtain capital from other sources, we may not be able to pay the dividend required to maintain our status as a REIT, make required principal and interest payments, make strategic acquisitions, or make necessary routine capital improvements or undertake redevelopment opportunities with respect to our existing portfolio of operating assets. In addition, if a property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and we are unable to meet mortgage payments, the holder of the mortgage could foreclose on the property, resulting in loss of income and asset value.
If principal amounts due at maturity cannot be refinanced, extended or paid with proceeds of other capital transactions, such as new debt or equity capital, our cash flow may be insufficient to repay all maturing debt. Prevailing interest rates or other factors at the time of a refinancing (such as possible reluctance of lenders to make commercial real estate loans) may result in higher interest rates and increased interest expense.
Capital Structure
We manage our capital structure to reflect a long-term investment approach, generally seeking to match the cash flow of our assets with a mix of equity and various debt instruments. We expect that our capital structure will allow us to obtain additional capital from diverse sources that could include additional equity offerings of common shares, public and private debt financings and possible asset dispositions. Our ability to raise funds through the sale of debt and equity securities is dependent on, among other things, general economic conditions, conditions in the capital markets, general market conditions for REITs, our operating performance, our debt rating and the current trading price of our shares. We will always analyze which source of capital is most advantageous to us at any particular point in time; however, the capital markets may not consistently be available on terms that are attractive.
Debt Financing
We generally use unsecured, corporate-level debt, including unsecured notes and our unsecured credit facilities, to meet our borrowing needs. Our total debt at June 30, 2008 is summarized as follows (in thousands):
Fixed rate mortgages |
$ | 331,575 | |
Unsecured credit facilities |
15,000 | ||
Unsecured notes payable |
920,000 | ||
Total debt |
$ | 1,266,575 | |
The $331.6 million in fixed rate mortgages, which includes $2.2 million in unamortized premiums due to fair value adjustments associated with assumption of certain mortgages in connection with acquisitions, bore an effective weighted average interest rate of 5.8% at June 30, 2008 and had a weighted average maturity of 5.4 years.
Our primary external source of liquidity is our two revolving credit facilities. At June 30, 2008 we had availability to borrow an additional $306.6 million under these lines, which bear interest at an adjustable spread over LIBOR based on our public debt rating. Credit Facility No. 1 is a four-year, $75.0 million unsecured credit facility expiring in June 2011, with an option for a one-year extension. Credit Facility No. 2 is a four-year $262.0 million unsecured credit facility that expires in November 2010, with an option for a one-year extension.
In February, WRIT completed an extinguishment of debt on $60 million of 10-year Mandatory Par Put Remarketed Securities (MOPPRS), resulting in an $8.4 million non-recurring charge, net of unamortized loan premium costs. WRIT entered into a $100 million unsecured term loan (the Term Loan), which was swapped for a fixed rate of 4.45% to refinance the extinguished debt. The 2010 Term Loan has a maturity date of February 19, 2010, and bears interest at WRITs option of LIBOR plus 1.50% or Wells Fargos prime rate. To hedge our exposure to interest rate fluctuations on the 2010 Term Loan, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement, which fixed the LIBOR portion of the interest rate on the term loan at 2.95% through February 2010. As a result of the interest rate swap agreement, the 2010 Term Loan bears interest at an effective fixed rate of 4.45% (2.95% plus 1.50% margin). The interest rate swap agreement will settle contemporaneously with the maturity of the 2010 Term Loan.
50
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
We anticipate that over the near term, interest rate fluctuations will not have a material adverse effect on earnings. Our unsecured fixed-rate notes payable have maturities ranging from February 2010 through February 2028 (see Note 6), as follows (in thousands):
Note Principal | |||
4.45% notes due 2010 |
$ | 100,000 | |
5.95% notes due 2011 |
150,000 | ||
5.05% notes due 2012 |
50,000 | ||
5.125% notes due 2013 |
60,000 | ||
5.25% notes due 2014 |
100,000 | ||
5.35% notes due 2015 |
150,000 | ||
3.875% notes due 2026 |
260,000 | ||
7.25% notes due 2028 |
50,000 | ||
$ | 920,000 | ||
Our unsecured revolving credit facilities and the unsecured notes payable contain certain financial and non-financial covenants, discussed in greater detail in our 2007 10-K, all of which were met as of June 30, 2008.
Our unsecured notes include certain non-financial covenants, and our unsecured, non-convertible notes also include certain financial covenants, with which we must comply. The financial covenants include limits on our total debt, limits on our secured debt, limits on our required debt service payments and maintenance of a minimum level of unencumbered assets. As of June 30, 2008 we were in compliance with all of our unsecured note covenants.
Dividends
We pay dividends quarterly. The maintenance of these dividends is subject to various factors, including the discretion of the Board of Trustees, the ability to pay dividends under Maryland law, the availability of cash to make the necessary dividend payments and the effect of REIT distribution requirements, which require at least 90% of our taxable income to be distributed to shareholders. Dividend and distribution payments were as follows for the 2008 and 2007 Quarters (in thousands):
Quarter Ended June 30, | Period Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
Common dividends |
$ | 21,421 | $ | 19,812 | $ | 41,177 | $ | 38,402 | ||||
Minority interest distributions |
48 | 35 | 95 | 68 | ||||||||
$ | 21,469 | $ | 19,847 | $ | 41,272 | $ | 38,470 | |||||
Dividends paid for the 2008 Quarter increased as a result of a quarterly dividend rate increase from $0.4225 per share to $0.4325 per share in June 2008 and the addition of 2.6 million shares from the equity offering in May 2008.
Acquisitions and Development
As of June 30, 2008 we had acquired two properties:
Acquisition Date |
Property Name |
Property Type |
Rentable Square Feet |
Purchase Price (in thousands) | |||||
February 22, 2008 |
6100 Columbia Park Road | Industrial/Flex | 150,000 | $ | 11,200 | ||||
May 21, 2008 |
Sterling Medical Office Building | Medical office | 36,000 | 6,500 | |||||
Total 2008 Period | 186,000 | $ | 17,700 | ||||||
51
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
As of June 30, 2007 we had acquired six properties:
Acquisition Date |
Property Name |
Property Type |
Rentable Square Feet |
Purchase Price (in thousands) | |||||
February 8, 2007 |
270 Technology Park | Industrial/Flex | 157,000 | $ | 26,500 | ||||
March 1, 2007 |
Monument II | Office | 205,000 | 78,200 | |||||
March 9, 2007 |
2440 M Street | Medical office | 110,000 | 50,000 | |||||
June 1, 2007 |
Woodholme Medical Office Building | Medical office | 125,000 | 29,000 | |||||
June 1, 2007 |
Woodholme Center | Office | 73,000 | 20,000 | |||||
June 1, 2007 |
Ashburn Farm Office Park | Medical office | 75,400 | 23,000 | |||||
Total 2007 Period | 745,400 | $ | 226,700 | ||||||
The acquisitions in 2008 were funded with cash from operations and borrowings on our line of credit.
The purchase of 270 Technology Park in February 2007 was funded from proceeds of our convertible debt offering in January 2007. The purchase of Monument II in March 2007 was funded with proceeds from the January convertible debt offering and borrowings of $30 million on our line of credit. The purchase of the 2440 M Street property was funded by borrowings on our line of credit. The three acquisitions in June, 2007 were funded with borrowings on our lines of credit.
As of June 30, 2008, we had funded $69.5 million, in development and land costs, on Phases I and II of the major development project at Dulles Station. The building shell for Phase I was completed in third quarter 2007.
Historical Cash Flows
Consolidated cash flow information is summarized as follows (in millions):
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||||
Cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 58.4 | $ | 66.2 | $ | (7.8 | ) | |||||
Cash used in investing activities |
$ | (48.6 | ) | $ | (257.2 | ) | $ | 208.6 | ||||
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
$ | (18.6 | ) | $ | 190.4 | $ | (209.0 | ) |
Operations generated $58.4 million of net cash in the 2008 Period compared to $66.2 million of net cash generated during the comparable period in 2007. The decrease in cash flow is driven by the timing of the payment of expenses.
Our investing activities used net cash of $48.6 million in the 2008 Period compared to $257.2 million in the 2007 Period. The change is due to the fact that there were two acquisitions in the 2008 Period for $16.8 million, as compared to six acquisitions for $200.1 million in the 2007 Period. Also, spending on the development projects was $13.6 million in the 2008 Period compared to $34.4 million in the 2007 Period.
Our financing activities used net cash of $18.6 million in the 2008 Period compared to $190.4 million provided in the 2007 Period. This difference was due primarily to the fact that the 2008 Period borrowings and proceeds from equity issuance were used to pay down the lines of credit and to pay off the $60 million MOPPRS debt and the related $8.4 million loss on extinguishment. The 2007 Period borrowings and proceeds from equity issuance were primarily used for the acquisition of new properties.
52
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE
The following table sets forth the Trusts ratios of earnings to fixed charges and debt service coverage for the periods shown:
Quarter Ended June 30, | Period Ended June 30, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||
Earnings to fixed charges |
1.3x | 1.3x | 1.0x | 1.4x | ||||
Debt service coverage |
2.4x | 2.5x | 2.2x | 2.6x |
We computed the ratio of earnings to fixed charges by dividing earnings by fixed charges. For this purpose, earnings consist of income from continuing operations plus fixed charges, less capitalized interest. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, including amortized costs of debt issuance, plus interest costs capitalized.
We computed the debt service coverage ratio by dividing earnings before interest income and expense, depreciation, amortization and gain on sale of real estate by interest expense and principal amortization.
Both the earnings to fixed charges ratio and the debt service coverage ratio for the Period ended June 30, 2008 include the impact of the loss on extinguishment of debt of $8.4 million during first the quarter of 2008 (see Consolidated Results of Operations in Item 2).
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS
Funds From Operations (FFO) is a widely used measure of operating performance for real estate companies. We provide FFO as a supplemental measure to net income calculated in accordance with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Although FFO is a widely used measure of operating performance for equity real estate investment trusts (REITs), FFO does not represent net income calculated in accordance with GAAP. As such, it should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our operating performance. In addition, FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, nor does it represent cash available to pay distributions and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities, determined in accordance with GAAP, as a measure of our liquidity. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. (NAREIT) defines FFO (April 2002 White Paper) as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property plus real estate depreciation and amortization. We consider FFO to be a standard supplemental measure for REITs because it facilitates an understanding of the operating performance of our properties without giving effect to real estate depreciation and amortization, which historically assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have instead historically risen or fallen with market conditions, we believe that FFO more accurately provides investors an indication of our ability to incur and service debt, make capital expenditures and fund other needs. Our FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs. These other REITs may not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or may interpret the current NAREIT definition differently.
The following table provides the calculation of our FFO and a reconciliation of FFO to net income (in thousands):
Quarter Ended June 30, | Period Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 21,208 | $ | 8,337 | $ | 19,720 | $ | 19,049 | |||||||
Adjustments: |
|||||||||||||||
Other income from life insurance proceeds |
| | | (1,303 | ) | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate |
(15,275 | ) | | (15,275 | ) | | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
21,198 | 16,632 | 41,723 | 32,758 | |||||||||||
Discontinued operations depreciation & amortization |
| 248 | | 897 | |||||||||||
FFO as defined by NAREIT |
$ | 27,131 | $ | 25,217 | $ | 46,168 | $ | 51,401 | |||||||
53
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
ITEM 3: | QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT FINANCIAL MARKET RISK |
The principal material financial market risk to which we are exposed is interest-rate risk. Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to refinancing long-term fixed rate obligations, the opportunity cost of fixed rate obligations in a falling interest rate environment and our variable rate lines of credit. We primarily enter into debt obligations to support general corporate purposes including acquisition of real estate properties, capital improvements and working capital needs.
In February 2008, we entered into an interest rate swap that qualifies as a cash flow hedge under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. We enter into interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to variable rate interest risk. We do not purchase derivatives for speculation. Our cash flow hedges are recorded at fair value. The effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges is recorded in other comprehensive income. The ineffective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges is recorded in earnings in the period affected. We assess effectiveness of our cash flow hedges both at inception and on an ongoing basis.
As the majority of our outstanding debt is long-term, fixed rate debt, our interest rate risk has not changed significantly from what was disclosed in our 2007 Form 10-K.
ITEM 4: | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Securities Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Accounting, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Accounting, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by the report. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Accounting concluded that the Trusts disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
There have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as defined by Rule 13a-15(f)) that occurred during the period covered by the report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting, other than as described above.
54
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
None
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
None
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
At WRITS annual meeting of Shareholders on May 15, 2008, the following member was elected to the Board of Trustees for a period of three years:
Affirmative Votes |
Negative/Withheld Votes | |||
Mr. Edward S. Civera |
37,821,222 | 893,075 |
Mr. Civera was elected as a Trustee. Trustees whose term in office continued after the meeting were Mr. Edmund B. Cronin, Jr, Mr. John M. Derrick, Jr, Mr. John P. McDaniel, Mr. Charles T. Nason, Mr. Edward S. Civera, and Mr. Thomas E. Russell,, III.
The Shareholders approved the recommendation of the Trustees to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as WRITS independent registered public accounting firm for 2008. The proposal received the following votes:
Affirmative Votes |
Negative Votes |
Abstain Votes | ||||
Auditors |
38,334,935 | 202,750 | 176,612 |
Item 5. | Other Information |
None
Item 6. | Exhibits |
(a) | Exhibits |
4. | Instruments Defining Rights of Security Holders |
(oo) Multifamily Note Agreement (Walker House Apartments) dated as of May 29, 2008 by and between Washington Real Estate Investment Trust and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
(pp) Multifamily Note Agreement (3801 Connecticut Avenue) dated as of May 29, 2008 by and between Washington Real Estate Investment Trust and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
(qq) Multifamily Note Agreement (Bethesda Hill Apartments) dated as of May 29, 2008 by and between Washington Real Estate Investment Trust and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
10. | Material Contracts |
(jj) Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of June 16, 2008 for 2445 M Street, NW, Washington, DC.
12. | Computation of Ratios |
31. | Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Section 302 Certifications |
(a) | Certification Chief Executive Officer | |
(b) | Certification Executive Vice President | |
(c) | Certification Chief Financial Officer |
55
32. | Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 section 906 Certification |
(a) | Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
56
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has fully caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST |
/s/ George F. McKenzie |
George F. McKenzie |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
/s/ Laura M. Franklin |
Laura M. Franklin |
Executive Vice President |
Accounting, Administration and Corporate Secretary |
/s/ Sara L. Grootwassink |
Sara L. Grootwassink |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Date August 8, 2008
57