Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:
| ¨ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
| ¨ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
| x | Definitive Proxy Statement |
| ¨ | Definitive Additional Materials |
| ¨ | Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12 |
MEDNAX, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
| x | No Fee Required. |
| ¨ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. |
| (1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
| (2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
| (3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
| (4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
| (5) | Total fee paid: |
| ¨ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials: |
| ¨ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
| (1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
| (2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
| (3) | Filing Party: |
| (4) | Date Filed: |
Table of Contents
1301 Concord Terrace
Sunrise, Florida 33323-2825
(954) 384-0175
March 22, 2013
Dear MEDNAX Shareholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2013 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of MEDNAX, Inc. (“MEDNAX”) on Thursday, May 9, 2013, beginning at 10:00 a.m., EDT, at the Renaissance Plantation, 1230 South Pine Island Road, Plantation, Florida 33324.
At the annual meeting, we will ask you to vote on the election of Roger J. Medel, M.D., Cesar L. Alvarez, Waldemar A. Carlo, M.D., Michael B. Fernandez, Roger K. Freeman, M.D., Paul G. Gabos, Pascal J. Goldschmidt, M.D., Manuel Kadre, Donna E. Shalala, Ph.D. and Enrique J. Sosa, Ph.D. to MEDNAX’s Board of Directors, to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered certified public accounting firm for the 2013 fiscal year, to conduct an advisory vote regarding executive compensation and act upon any other business properly brought before the meeting. Please vote on all the matters described in our Proxy Statement. Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the election of each of the 10 nominees for Director stated above, “FOR” ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered certified public accounting firm for the 2013 fiscal year and “FOR” the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers.
Under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are providing access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “E-Proxy Notice”) on or about March 22, 2013, to MEDNAX’s shareholders of record on March 12, 2013. The E-Proxy Notice contains instructions for your use of this process, including how to access our Proxy Statement and Annual Report and how to vote online. In addition, the E-Proxy Notice contains instructions on how you may (i) receive a paper copy of the Proxy Statement and Annual Report or (ii) elect to receive your Proxy Statement and Annual Report over the Internet.
Whether or not you plan to attend in person, it is important that your shares be represented and voted at the annual meeting. You may vote your shares over the Internet as described in the E-Proxy Notice. As an alternative, if you received a paper copy of the proxy card by mail, please mark, sign, date and promptly return the card in the self-addressed stamped envelope provided. You may also vote by telephone as described in your proxy card. Voting by telephone, over the Internet or by mailing a proxy card will not limit your right to attend the annual meeting and vote your shares in person.
We appreciate your continued support of our Company.
Sincerely,
Roger J. Medel, M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
Table of Contents
MEDNAX, INC.
NOTICE OF 2013 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 9, 2013
To the Shareholders of MEDNAX, Inc.:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2013 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of MEDNAX, Inc., a Florida corporation (“MEDNAX”), will be held at 10:00 a.m., EDT, on Thursday, May 9, 2013, at the Renaissance Plantation, 1230 South Pine Island Road, Plantation, Florida 33324, for the following purposes, as more fully described in our Proxy Statement:
| • | to elect Roger J. Medel, M.D., Cesar L. Alvarez, Waldemar A. Carlo, M.D., Michael B. Fernandez, Roger K. Freeman, M.D., Paul G. Gabos, Pascal J. Goldschmidt, M.D., Manuel Kadre, Donna E. Shalala, Ph.D. and Enrique J. Sosa, Ph.D. as Directors, each for a term expiring at the next annual meeting or until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified; |
| • | to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered certified public accounting firm for the 2013 fiscal year; |
| • | to cast an advisory vote approving the Company’s executive compensation; and |
| • | to consider and act upon such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting. |
The Board of Directors of MEDNAX has fixed the close of business on March 12, 2013, as the record date for determining those shareholders entitled to notice of, to attend and to vote at the meeting and any postponement or adjournment thereof.
Whether or not you plan to attend, please vote your shares over the Internet, as described in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “E-Proxy Notice”). As an alternative, if you received a paper copy of the proxy card by mail, please mark, sign, date and promptly return the proxy card in the self-addressed stamped envelope provided. You may also vote by telephone as described in your proxy card. Shareholders who vote over the Internet, following the instructions provided in the E-Proxy Notice, who return proxy cards by mail or vote by telephone prior to the meeting may nevertheless attend the meeting, revoke their proxies and vote their shares in person.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Dominic J. Andreano
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
Sunrise, Florida
March 22, 2013
Table of Contents
| Page | ||||
| 1 | ||||
| 1 | ||||
| 1 | ||||
| 2 | ||||
| 2 | ||||
| 2 | ||||
| 2 | ||||
| 2 | ||||
| 2 | ||||
| 3 | ||||
| 3 | ||||
| How Does the Board of Directors Recommend I Vote on the Proposals? |
4 | |||
| 4 | ||||
| 4 | ||||
| 4 | ||||
| 5 | ||||
| 5 | ||||
| Questions and Answers About Our Corporate Governance Practices |
6 | |||
| 6 | ||||
| 6 | ||||
| 6 | ||||
| 6 | ||||
| What Role Does the Board of Directors Serve in Risk Oversight for the Company? |
7 | |||
| How Can Shareholders Communicate with the Board of Directors? |
7 | |||
| 7 | ||||
| 7 | ||||
| 9 | ||||
| 10 | ||||
| 10 | ||||
| 13 | ||||
| 13 | ||||
| 13 | ||||
| 14 | ||||
| 15 | ||||
| 15 | ||||
| 15 | ||||
| 16 | ||||
| 16 | ||||
| 16 | ||||
| 16 | ||||
| 16 | ||||
| 17 | ||||
| 18 | ||||
| 18 | ||||
| 19 | ||||
(i)
Table of Contents
| Page | ||||
| 20 | ||||
| 21 | ||||
| 22 | ||||
| 24 | ||||
| 25 | ||||
| 25 | ||||
| 26 | ||||
| 26 | ||||
| 28 | ||||
| 29 | ||||
| 30 | ||||
| 31 | ||||
| 31 | ||||
| 38 | ||||
| 39 | ||||
| 39 | ||||
| Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management |
39 | |||
| 41 | ||||
| 41 | ||||
| 41 | ||||
| 41 | ||||
| 41 | ||||
| 41 | ||||
| 41 | ||||
| 41 | ||||
| PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS |
42 | |||
| 43 | ||||
| 44 | ||||
| 44 | ||||
| 44 | ||||
(ii)
Table of Contents
MEDNAX, INC.
1301 Concord Terrace
Sunrise, Florida 33323-2825
PROXY STATEMENT
We are furnishing this Proxy Statement and related materials to MEDNAX’s shareholders as part of the solicitation of proxies by MEDNAX’s Board of Directors for use at MEDNAX’s 2013 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting and at any postponement or adjournment of the meeting. As used in this Proxy Statement, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “MEDNAX,” “we,” “us,” “our” and the “Company” refer to the parent company, MEDNAX, Inc., a Florida corporation, and the consolidated subsidiaries through which its businesses are actually conducted, together with MEDNAX’s affiliated professional associations, corporations and partnerships.
On December 31, 2008, Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc., a Florida corporation (“Pediatrix”), and MEDNAX completed a holding company formation transaction that established MEDNAX as the parent company of Pediatrix, now known as MEDNAX Services, Inc. Throughout this Proxy Statement, when we refer to MEDNAX or to the Company in reference to activities that occurred prior to the reorganization on December 31, 2008, we are referring to Pediatrix, and when we refer to the Company in reference to activities occurring after the reorganization, we are referring to MEDNAX, except to the extent the context otherwise indicates.
Under the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are furnishing our proxy materials to our shareholders over the Internet and providing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “E-Proxy Notice”) by mail instead of mailing a printed copy of our proxy materials, which include our Proxy Statement and Annual Report, to all MEDNAX shareholders. The E-Proxy Notice will instruct you on how you may access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials. The E-Proxy Notice also instructs you how you may submit your proxy via the Internet. You will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you request to receive these materials in hard copy by following the instructions provided in the E-Proxy Notice.
We are mailing the E-Proxy Notice on or about March 22, 2013, to MEDNAX’s shareholders of record on March 12, 2013.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT OUR ANNUAL MEETING
What Is the Date, Time and Place of the Annual Meeting?
MEDNAX’s 2013 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting will be held on Thursday, May 9, 2013, beginning at 10:00 a.m., EDT, at the Renaissance Plantation, 1230 South Pine Island Road, Plantation, Florida 33324.
What Is the Purpose of the Annual Meeting?
At the annual meeting, MEDNAX’s shareholders will be asked to:
| • | elect 10 Directors, each for a term expiring at the next annual meeting or until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified; |
| • | ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered certified public accounting firm for the 2013 fiscal year; |
| • | cast an advisory vote regarding executive compensation; and |
| • | consider and act upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting. |
1
Table of Contents
Who Is Entitled to Vote at the Annual Meeting?
Only holders of record of our common stock at the close of business on March 12, 2013, the record date for the meeting, are entitled to notice of, to attend and to vote at the annual meeting, or any postponements or adjournments of the meeting. At the close of business on the record date, 50,168,072 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding and were held by approximately 269 holders of record.
What Are the Voting Rights of MEDNAX’s Shareholders?
MEDNAX’s shareholders have one vote per share of MEDNAX common stock owned on the record date for each matter properly presented at the annual meeting. For example, if you owned 100 shares of our common stock on the close of business on March 12, 2013, you can cast 100 votes for each matter properly presented at the annual meeting.
A quorum will be present at the meeting if holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock on the record date are represented at the meeting in person or by proxy. If a quorum is not present at the meeting, MEDNAX expects to postpone or adjourn the meeting to solicit additional proxies. Abstentions, including broker non-votes (as described below), will be counted as shares present and entitled to vote for the purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum.
“Broker non-votes” occur when shares held by a brokerage firm are not voted with respect to a proposal because the firm has not received voting instructions from the shareholder and the firm does not have the authority to vote the shares at its discretion. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, brokerage firms may have the authority to vote their customers’ shares on certain routine matters for which they do not receive voting instructions, including the ratification of the appointment of independent auditors. The election of directors and the advisory vote on executive compensation are considered “non-routine” matters under the New York Stock Exchange rules. In addition, other matters may properly be brought before the meeting that may be considered “non-routine” under the applicable New York Stock Exchange rules. Shares held by a brokerage firm will not be voted on such non-routine matters by a brokerage firm unless it has received voting instructions from the shareholder and, accordingly, any such shares will be “broker non-votes.”
How Are Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes Treated?
Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast either in favor of or against the election of the nominees for Director or the advisory vote on executive compensation. Abstentions will not be counted as votes cast either in favor of or against the ratification of the appointment of our independent auditors.
Will My Shares Be Voted if I Do Not Provide My Proxy?
If your shares are held in the name of a brokerage firm, they will not be voted by the brokerage firm except as described above if you do not give the brokerage firm specific voting instructions. If you are a registered shareholder and hold your shares directly in your own name, your shares will not be voted unless you provide a proxy or fill out a written ballot in person at the meeting.
2
Table of Contents
You can vote in any of the following ways:
To vote via the Internet:
| • | Follow the instructions on your proxy card and E-Proxy Notice; and |
| • | Vote your shares as instructed on your proxy card and E-Proxy Notice. |
To vote by telephone if you are a registered shareholder who received a paper proxy card:
| • | Dial 1-800-690-6903 from any touch-tone telephone at any time up until 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 8, 2013; and |
| • | Have your proxy card in hand and follow the instructions given to you on the line. |
To vote by mail if you are a registered shareholder who received a paper proxy card:
| • | Mark, sign and date your proxy card; and |
| • | Return it in the envelope provided. |
To vote if you hold your shares in “street name,” follow the instructions of your bank or broker or vote in person as described below.
To vote in person if you hold your shares in “street name”:
| • | Attend our annual meeting; |
| • | Bring valid photo identification; and |
| • | Obtain a legal proxy from your bank or broker to vote the shares that are held for your benefit, attach it to your completed proxy card and deliver it in person. |
To vote in person if you are a registered shareholder:
| • | Attend our annual meeting; |
| • | Bring valid photo identification; and |
| • | Deliver your completed proxy card or ballot in person. |
What Vote Is Required for the Proposals?
Assuming that a quorum is present at the annual meeting, the 10 Director nominees receiving the highest number of affirmative votes from holders of our common stock will be elected as Directors of MEDNAX.
In 2012, the Board of Directors amended our corporate governance principles to adopt a majority voting policy. The majority voting policy is applicable solely to uncontested elections, which are those elections in which the number of nominees for election is less than or equal to the number of directors to be elected. Under the majority voting policy, any nominee for director who receives more “withheld” votes than “for” votes in an uncontested election must submit a written offer to resign as director. Any such resignation will be reviewed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and, within 90 days after the election, the independent members of the Board of Directors will determine whether to accept, reject or take other appropriate action with respect to, the resignation, in furtherance of the best interests of MEDNAX and its shareholders.
Assuming that a quorum is present, ratification of the appointment of our independent registered certified public accounting firm and the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers each requires a majority of the votes cast on the proposal at the annual meeting.
3
Table of Contents
How Does the Board of Directors Recommend I Vote on the Proposals?
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote:
| • | “FOR” the election of each of the 10 nominees for Director named in this Proxy Statement; |
| • | “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered certified public accounting firm for the 2013 fiscal year; and |
| • | “FOR” the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers. |
How Will My Proxy Holders Vote?
The enclosed proxy designates Roger J. Medel, M.D., our Chief Executive Officer, Dominic J. Andreano, our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, and Vivian Lopez-Blanco, our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, each with full power of substitution, to hold your proxy and vote your shares. Dr. Medel, Mr. Andreano and Ms. Lopez-Blanco will vote all shares of our common stock represented by proxies properly submitted via telephone or the Internet or properly executed proxies received in time for the annual meeting in the manner specified by the holders of those shares. Dr. Medel, Mr. Andreano and Ms. Lopez-Blanco intend to vote all shares of our common stock represented by proxies properly submitted via telephone, or the Internet, or that are properly executed by the record holder but otherwise do not contain voting instructions, as follows:
| • | “FOR” the election of each of the 10 nominees for Director named in this Proxy Statement; |
| • | “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered certified public accounting firm for the 2013 fiscal year; |
| • | “FOR” the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers; and |
| • | in accordance with the recommendation of MEDNAX’s Board of Directors, “FOR” or “AGAINST” all other matters as may properly come before the annual meeting. |
Can I Change My Vote After I Have Voted?
Voting by telephone, over the Internet or by mailing a proxy card does not preclude a shareholder from voting in person at the meeting. A shareholder may revoke a proxy, whether submitted via telephone, the Internet or mailed, at any time prior to its exercise by filing with MEDNAX’s Secretary a duly executed revocation of proxy, by properly submitting, either by telephone, mail or Internet, a proxy to MEDNAX’s Secretary bearing a later date or by appearing at the meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the meeting will not itself constitute revocation of a proxy.
Who Pays for the Preparation of the Proxy Statement?
MEDNAX will bear the cost of the solicitation of proxies from its shareholders, including preparing, printing and mailing this Proxy Statement, should you request a printed copy of the proxy materials, and the E-Proxy Notice. In addition to solicitations by mail, MEDNAX’s Directors, officers and employees, and those of its subsidiaries and affiliates, may solicit proxies from shareholders by telephone or other electronic means or in person but will receive no additional compensation for soliciting such proxies. MEDNAX will cause banks and brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of our common stock held of record by such banks, brokerage firms, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries. MEDNAX will reimburse such banks, brokerage firms, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in doing so.
4
Table of Contents
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF MEDNAX’S DIRECTORS
MEDNAX’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, each as amended and restated, provide that the number of Directors constituting MEDNAX’s Board of Directors will be determined from time to time by resolution adopted by MEDNAX’s Board of Directors. Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the nominees for Director to be elected at the annual meeting in 2013 by the holders of our common stock are as follows:
| • | Roger J. Medel, M.D., who has served as a Director since 1979; |
| • | Cesar L. Alvarez, who has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors since May 2004 and as a Director since March 1997; |
| • | Waldemar A. Carlo, M.D., who has served as a Director since June 1999; |
| • | Michael B. Fernandez, who has served as a Director since October 1995; |
| • | Roger K. Freeman, M.D., who has served as a Director since May 2002; |
| • | Paul G. Gabos, who has served as a Director since November 2002; |
| • | Pascal J. Goldschmidt, M.D., who has served as a Director since March 2006; |
| • | Manuel Kadre, who has served as a Director since May 2007; |
| • | Donna E. Shalala, Ph.D., who has served as a Director since May 2010; and |
| • | Enrique J. Sosa, Ph.D., who has served as a Director since May 2004. |
Please see below under “Directors and Executive Officers” for the biographies of these nominees for Director.
Each Director elected will serve for a term expiring at MEDNAX’s 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which is expected to be held in May 2014, or until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified.
MEDNAX’s Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any nominee will refuse to act or be unable to accept election; however, in the event that a nominee for a directorship is unable to accept election or if any other unforeseen contingencies should arise, proxies will be voted for the remaining nominees and for such other person as may be designated by MEDNAX’s Board of Directors, unless the proxies provide otherwise.
If a quorum is present at the annual meeting, the 10 nominees receiving the highest number of votes “FOR” election will be elected to the Board of Directors of MEDNAX, subject to the majority voting policy described above. Proxies will be voted “FOR” all such nominees absent contrary instructions.
MEDNAX’s Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the election of each of the 10 nominees for Director.
GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS
Our business, property and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board of Directors, except with respect to those matters reserved for our shareholders. Our Board of Directors establishes our overall corporate policies, reviews the performance of our senior management in executing our business strategy and managing our day-to-day operations and acts as an advisor to our senior management. Our Board of Directors’ mission is to further the long-term interests of our shareholders. Members of the Board of Directors are kept informed of MEDNAX’s business through discussions with MEDNAX’s management, primarily at meetings of the Board of Directors and its committees, and through reports and analyses presented to them. Significant communications between our Directors and senior management occur apart from such meetings.
5
Table of Contents
Questions and Answers About Our Corporate Governance Practices
What Committees Have Our Board of Directors Established?
The standing committees of MEDNAX’s Board of Directors are the Executive Committee, the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Medical Science and Technology Committee. Copies of the charters for these committees, as well as our corporate governance principles, are available on our Website at www.mednax.com. Our Internet Website and the information contained therein, other than material expressly referred to in this Proxy Statement, or connected thereto are not incorporated into this Proxy Statement. A copy of our committee charters and corporate governance principles are also available upon request from MEDNAX’s Secretary at 1301 Concord Terrace, Sunrise, Florida 33323.
How Many Times Did Our Board of Directors Meet During 2012?
During 2012, MEDNAX’s Board of Directors held 11 meetings and took various actions by unanimous written consent. Committees of the Board of Directors held a combined total of 19 meetings and also took actions by unanimous written consent. Each Director attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of MEDNAX’s Board of Directors and its committees held during 2012 during the period he or she was a member thereof. Although MEDNAX has no formal policy with respect to its Directors’ attendance at MEDNAX’s annual shareholders’ meetings, in 2012 all of our Directors attended the annual shareholders’ meeting, with the exception of Mr. Fernandez.
Are a Majority of Our Directors Independent?
Our Board of Directors has reviewed information about each of our non-employee Directors and made the determination that all of the non-employee Directors on our Board of Directors are independent. In arriving at this conclusion, our Board of Directors made the affirmative determination that each of Drs. Carlo, Goldschmidt, Freeman, Sosa and Shalala and Messrs. Alvarez, Fernandez, Gabos and Kadre meet the Board of Directors’ previously adopted categorical standards for determining independence in accordance with the New York Stock Exchange’s corporate governance rules. In making this determination, the Board of Directors considered transactions and relationships between each Director or any member of his or her immediate family and MEDNAX and its subsidiaries and affiliates. These transactions consisted of the payment of travel and entertainment expenses for the spouses of our Directors in connection with our Board of Directors’ annual board retreat and meetings and those transactions reported below under “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions – Transactions with Related Persons.” Our Board of Directors determined that each of these transactions and relationships was within the New York Stock Exchange standards and our categorical standards and that none of the transactions or relationships affected the independence of the Director involved. Our adopted categorical standards for determining independence in accordance with the New York Stock Exchange’s corporate governance rules are contained in our corporate governance principles, a copy of which is available on our Website at www.mednax.com.
Who Is the “Chairman of the Board” or “Presiding Director”?
To assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its obligations, following each annual meeting of the shareholders, MEDNAX’s Board of Directors designates a non-management Director as “Chairman of the Board” or, alternatively, as “Presiding Director.” MEDNAX separates the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board or Presiding Director in recognition of the differences between the two roles. The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for determining the strategic direction for the Company and the day-to-day leadership and performance of the Company. The principal responsibility of the Chairman of the Board or Presiding Director is to serve as chief administrative liaison between independent Directors and MEDNAX management and to monitor implementation of Board of Directors’ directives and actions. At least once a year, the Chairman of the Board or Presiding Director also presides over meetings of our independent Directors. Following our 2012 annual meeting of shareholders, our Board of Directors appointed Mr. Alvarez to serve as Chairman of the Board.
6
Table of Contents
What Role Does the Board of Directors Serve in Risk Oversight for the Company?
The Board of Directors provides oversight of the Company’s risk exposure by receiving periodic reports from senior management regarding matters relating to financial, operational, regulatory, legal and strategic risks and mitigation strategies for such risks. In addition, as reflected in the Audit Committee Charter, the Board of Directors has delegated to the Audit Committee responsibility to oversee, discuss and evaluate the Company’s policies and guidelines with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including internal control over financial reporting. As appropriate, the Audit Committee provides reports to and receives direction from the full Board of Directors regarding the Company’s risk management policies and guidelines, as well as the Audit Committee’s risk oversight activities.
How Can Shareholders Communicate with the Board of Directors?
Anyone who has a concern about MEDNAX’s conduct, including accounting, internal accounting controls or audit matters, may communicate directly with our Chairman of the Board of Directors (or Presiding Director), our non-management Directors, the Chairman of the Audit Committee or the Audit Committee. Such communications may be confidential or anonymous, and may be submitted in writing to the Chief Compliance Officer, MEDNAX, Inc., 1301 Concord Terrace, Sunrise, Florida 33323, or reported by phone at 877-835-5764. All such concerns will be forwarded to the appropriate Directors for their review, and will be simultaneously reviewed and addressed by the Company’s General Counsel or Chief Compliance Officer in the same way that other concerns are addressed by us. MEDNAX’s Code of Conduct, which is discussed below, prohibits any employee from retaliating or taking any adverse action against anyone for raising or helping to resolve an integrity concern.
Has MEDNAX Adopted a Code of Conduct?
MEDNAX has adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to all Directors, officers, employees and independent contractors of MEDNAX and its affiliated medical practices. MEDNAX intends to disclose any amendments to, or waivers from, any provision of the Code of Conduct that applies to any of MEDNAX’s executive officers or Directors by posting such information on our Website at www.mednax.com.
MEDNAX has also adopted a Code of Professional Conduct — Finance that applies to all employees with access to, and responsibility for, matters of finance and financial management, including MEDNAX’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. MEDNAX intends to disclose any amendments to, or waivers from, any provision of the Code of Conduct that applies to any of MEDNAX’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions by posting such information on our Website at www.mednax.com.
Copies of our Code of Conduct and the Code of Professional Conduct — Finance are available on our Website at www.mednax.com and upon request from MEDNAX’s Secretary at 1301 Concord Terrace, Sunrise, Florida 33323.
The following report of the Audit Committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any of MEDNAX’s filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), except to the extent that we specifically incorporate such report by reference.
We act under a written charter that has been adopted by MEDNAX’s Board of Directors. While we have the responsibilities set forth in this charter, it is not our duty to plan or conduct audits or to determine that MEDNAX’s financial statements are complete, accurate or in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. This is the responsibility of MEDNAX’s management and independent auditors.
7
Table of Contents
Our primary function is to assist the Board of Directors in their evaluation and oversight of the integrity of MEDNAX’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, the qualifications and independence of MEDNAX’s independent auditors and the performance of MEDNAX’s audit functions. In addition, while we are also responsible for assisting the Board of Directors in their evaluation and oversight of MEDNAX’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations, it is not our duty to assure compliance with such laws and regulations or MEDNAX’s Compliance Plan and related policies. We are also responsible for overseeing, discussing and evaluating MEDNAX’s guidelines, policies and processes with respect to risk assessment and risk management and the steps management has taken to monitor and control risk exposure, and we advise the Board of Directors with respect to such matters, as appropriate.
We also oversee MEDNAX’s auditing, accounting and financial reporting processes generally. Management is responsible for MEDNAX’s financial statements and the financial reporting process, including the system of internal controls. We also review the preparation by management of MEDNAX’s quarterly and annual financial statements. MEDNAX’s independent auditors, who are accountable to us, are responsible for expressing an opinion as to whether the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of MEDNAX in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). MEDNAX’s independent auditors are also responsible for auditing and reporting on the effective operation of MEDNAX’s internal control over financial reporting. We are responsible for retaining MEDNAX’s independent auditors, and maintain sole responsibility for their compensation, oversight and termination. We are also responsible for pre-approving all non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditors, and on an annual basis discussing with the independent auditors all significant relationships they have with MEDNAX to determine their independence.
In fulfilling our oversight role, we met and held discussions with MEDNAX’s management and independent auditors. Management advised us that MEDNAX’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and we reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. In addition, we reviewed and discussed the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of MEDNAX’s periodic reports, key accounting and reporting issues and the scope, adequacy and assessments of MEDNAX’s internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures with management and MEDNAX’s independent auditors. We discussed privately with the independent auditors matters deemed significant by the independent auditors, including those matters required to be discussed pursuant to U.S. Auditing Standards AU Section 380 (Communication with Audit Committees), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.
The independent auditors also provided us with the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and we discussed with the independent auditors matters relating to their independence. We also reviewed a report by the independent auditors describing the firm’s internal quality-control procedures and any material issues raised in the most recent internal-quality control review or external peer review or inspection performed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.
Based on our review with management and the independent auditors of MEDNAX’s audited consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting and the independent auditors’ report on such financial statements and their evaluation of MEDNAX’s internal controls over financial reporting, and based on the discussions and written disclosures described above and our business judgment, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, be included in MEDNAX’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
Paul G. Gabos
Manuel Kadre
Enrique J. Sosa, Ph.D.
8
Table of Contents
Report of the Compensation Committee
The following report of the Compensation Committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any of MEDNAX’s filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate such report by reference.
In fulfilling our role, we met and held discussions with MEDNAX’s management and reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A. Based on the review and discussions with management and our business judgment, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
Manuel Kadre
Michael B. Fernandez
Waldemar A. Carlo, M.D.
9
Table of Contents
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
MEDNAX’s Directors and Executive Officers
MEDNAX’s Directors and Executive Officers are as follows:
| Name |
Age | Position with MEDNAX | ||||
| Roger J. Medel, M.D. (1) |
66 | Chief Executive Officer and Director | ||||
| Cesar L. Alvarez (1) |
65 | Chairman of the Board of Directors | ||||
| Waldemar A. Carlo, M.D. (3)(5) |
60 | Director | ||||
| Michael B. Fernandez (3)(4) |
60 | Director | ||||
| Roger K. Freeman, M.D. (4)(5) |
77 | Director | ||||
| Paul G. Gabos (1)(2) |
47 | Director | ||||
| Pascal J. Goldschmidt, M.D. (5) |
58 | Director | ||||
| Manuel Kadre (2)(3) |
47 | Director | ||||
| Donna E. Shalala, Ph.D. |
72 | Director | ||||
| Enrique J. Sosa, Ph.D. (2)(4) |
72 | Director | ||||
| Joseph M. Calabro |
52 | President and Chief Operating Officer | ||||
| Dominic J. Andreano |
44 | Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary | ||||
| David A. Clark |
46 | Chief Operating Officer, Pediatrix Division | ||||
| Vivian Lopez-Blanco |
55 | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | ||||
| Michael D. Stanley, M.D. |
66 | President, Pediatrix Division | ||||
| Karl B. Wagner |
47 | President, American Anesthesiology | ||||
| (1) | Member of the Executive Committee. |
| (2) | Member of the Audit Committee. |
| (3) | Member of the Compensation Committee. |
| (4) | Member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. |
| (5) | Member of the Medical Science and Technology Committee. |
Roger J. Medel, M.D., has been a Director of the Company since he co-founded it in 1979. Dr. Medel served as the Company’s President until May 2000 and as Chief Executive Officer until December 2002. In March 2003, Dr. Medel reassumed the position of President, serving in that position until May 2004, and Chief Executive Officer, a position in which he continues to serve today. Dr. Medel was a member of the Board of Trustees of the University of Miami from January 2004 to February 2012. Dr. Medel participates as a member of several medical and professional organizations and, from June 2006 to April 2009, served on the Board of Directors of MBF Healthcare Acquisition Corp. The Board of Directors has concluded that Dr. Medel’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his experience as our Chief Executive Officer and founder of the Company and a physician with training and experience in the Company’s historical base service line of neonatology.
Cesar L. Alvarez has been a Director since March 1997 and was elected as Chairman of the Board of Directors in May 2004. Mr. Alvarez has served since February 2012 as Co-Chairman of the international law firm of Greenberg Traurig, P.A. and previously served as its Chief Executive Officer from 1997 until his election as Executive Chairman in January 2010 and as its Executive Chairman from January 2010 until his election as Co-Chairman. Mr. Alvarez also serves on the Board of Directors of Watsco, Inc. and Fairholme Funds, Inc. Mr. Alvarez served as a director of Atlantis Plastics, Inc. from 1995 until 2008 and as a director of New River Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 2004 until 2007. The Board of Directors has concluded that Mr. Alvarez’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his management experience as the current Co-Chairman and as former Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman of one of the nation’s largest law firms with professionals providing services in multiple locations across the country and abroad as well as his many years of corporate governance experience, both counseling and serving on the Boards of Directors of publicly traded and private companies.
10
Table of Contents
Waldemar A. Carlo, M.D., was elected as a Director in June 1999. Dr. Carlo has served as Professor of Pediatrics and Director of the Division of Neonatology at the University of Alabama School of Medicine since 1991. Dr. Carlo participates as a member of several medical and professional organizations. He has received numerous research awards and grants and has lectured extensively, both nationally and internationally. The Board of Directors has concluded that Dr. Carlo’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his experience as a nationally known Professor of Neonatology leading one of the nation’s largest academic neonatal practices as well as his experience performing scientific research and developing and implementing educational programs for physicians.
Michael B. Fernandez was elected as a Director in October 1995. Mr. Fernandez has served as Chairman and is and has been a Managing Director of MBF Healthcare Partners, L.P., a private equity firm focused on investing in healthcare service companies, since February 2005. He is also the Chairman of Simply Healthcare Holdings and Navarro Discount Pharmacies, LLC. Mr. Fernandez previously served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CarePlus Health Plans Inc., a managed care HMO, from January 2003 until February 2005, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Physicians Healthcare Plans, Inc., a Florida-based HMO, from 1992 until December 2002, and as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MBF Healthcare Acquisition Corp. from June 2006 until April 2009. Mr. Fernandez has served as a member of the Board of Trustees of the University of Miami and was on the Board of Directors of various private entities, including Healthcare Atlantic, Inc., a holding company that operates various health care entities. The Board of Directors has concluded that Mr. Fernandez’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his experience over many years as a founder, investor and executive in a variety of successful healthcare businesses (including managed care companies), his financial and marketing expertise, as well as his experience as a member of the Board of Trustees of the University of Miami.
Roger K. Freeman, M.D., was elected as a Director in May 2002. Dr. Freeman is a maternal-fetal medicine physician and is currently an Assistant Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of California - Irvine. In 1975, he founded Perinatal Associates of Southern California, a physician practice group that has been affiliated with the Company since we acquired Magella Healthcare Corporation (“Magella Healthcare”) in May 2001. In September 1999, Dr. Freeman retired from the private practice of medicine. Dr. Freeman has served on many national and local obstetrics and gynecology and maternal-fetal organizations. He is currently a member of the Long Beach Memorial Medical Center Foundation Board and serves on the Board of Directors of Todd Cancer Institute at Long Beach Memorial Hospital. Dr. Freeman has authored numerous articles and three books. The Board of Directors has concluded that Dr. Freeman’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his experience as a nationally known Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology with expertise in maternal-fetal medicine as well as his experience with performing scientific research and developing and implementing educational programs for physicians.
Paul G. Gabos was elected as a Director in November 2002. Mr. Gabos served as Chief Financial Officer of Lincare Holdings Inc. (“Lincare”) from June 1997 until December 2012, after its merger with a subsidiary of Linde AG, and prior thereto served as Vice President — Administration for Lincare. Prior to joining Lincare in 1993, Mr. Gabos worked for Coopers & Lybrand and for Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. The Board of Directors has concluded that Mr. Gabos’ qualifications to serve on the Board include his management experience as a senior executive and financial expertise as Chief Financial Officer of a publicly traded healthcare services company and prior thereto as an investment banker with a large national firm.
Pascal J. Goldschmidt, M.D., was elected as a Director in March 2006. Dr. Goldschmidt has been the Chief Executive Officer of the University of Miami Health System since November 2007 and the Senior Vice President for Medical Affairs and Dean of the University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine since April 2006. Previously, Dr. Goldschmidt was a faculty member with the Department of Medicine at Duke University Medical Center where he served as Chairman from 2003 to 2006 and as Chief of the Division of Cardiology from 2000 to 2003. Dr. Goldschmidt currently serves on the Board of Directors of Health Management Associates and previously served as a director for Opko Health, Inc. from 2007 until 2011. The Board of Directors has
11
Table of Contents
concluded that Dr. Goldschmidt’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his experience as a Chief Executive Officer of a healthcare and hospital system, as Dean of a premier medical school managing physicians and other healthcare professionals, as a physician trained in cardiology, as well as his experience performing scientific research and developing and implementing educational programs for physicians.
Manuel Kadre was elected as a Director in May 2007. Mr. Kadre has been the Chief Executive Officer of Gold Coast Caribbean Importers, LLC since July 2009 and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MBB Auto LLC since December 2012. From 1995 until July 2009, Mr. Kadre served as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of CC1 Companies, Inc., which distributes Coca-Cola and other beverage products in markets throughout the Caribbean. Mr. Kadre also serves on the Board of Trustees of the University of Miami and the Board of Governors of University of Miami Hospital and previously served as a director of Equity Media Holdings Corporation from April 2007 until December 2008. The Board of Directors has concluded that Mr. Kadre’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his experience in acquiring and managing businesses, including those in regulated industries and in government relations, his financial expertise as well as his experience as a member of the Board of Trustees of the University of Miami.
Donna E. Shalala, Ph.D., was elected as a Director in May 2010. Dr. Shalala has served as the President of the University of Miami and Professor of Political Science at the University of Miami since 2001. From 1993 until 2001, Dr. Shalala served as the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services. Dr. Shalala served as Chancellor and Professor of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin-Madison from 1987 to 1993 and as President and Professor of Political Science at Hunter College from 1980 to 1987. From 1977 to 1980, Dr. Shalala served as Assistant Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Dr. Shalala is a member of the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Medicine. Dr. Shalala served as a director of Lennar Corporation from 2001 to April 2012, as a director of Gannett Co., Inc. from 2001 until 2007 and as a director of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated from 2001 to 2011. The Board of Directors has concluded that Dr. Shalala’s qualifications to serve on the Board include her expertise in health policy, financing and administration and her experience as the former Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services as well as the current President of the University of Miami, one of the top research universities in the country.
Enrique J. Sosa, Ph.D., was elected as a Director in May 2004. Dr. Sosa, who is presently retired, served as President of BP Amoco Chemicals from January 1999 to April 1999. From 1995 to 1998, he was Executive Vice President of Amoco Corporation. Prior to joining Amoco, Dr. Sosa served as Senior Vice President of The Dow Chemical Company, President of Dow North America and a member of its Board of Directors. Dr. Sosa was a Director of FMC Corporation from June 1999 until April 2012 and a Director of Northern Trust Corporation from April 2007 until April 2012. The Board of Directors has concluded that Dr. Sosa’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his management and financial expertise as a former executive officer of large international industrial businesses, his many years of experience with corporate governance, and his service on the Boards of Directors of other publicly traded companies.
Joseph M. Calabro joined the Company in January 1996 as Chief Information Officer. In January 2000, Mr. Calabro was appointed Executive Vice President, Management, in May 2000, he was appointed Chief Operating Officer, and in May 2004, he was appointed President. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Calabro served as Director of Information Technology for the Ambulatory Surgery Group of Columbia/HCA. He served in various operational and technology positions for various healthcare companies from 1987 to 1994.
Dominic J. Andreano joined the Company in September 2001 and was appointed Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary in May 2012. Prior to his appointment, Mr. Andreano previously served as Deputy General Counsel for the Company from January 2009 until May 2012, as Associate General Counsel for the Company from January 2004 until December 2008, and prior thereto as Director, Business Development. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Andreano was an associate in the corporate securities department of Holland & Knight, LLP in Miami from June 2000 until September 2001, and an associate in the health care corporate department of Greenberg Traurig, P.A. in Miami from September 1997 until June 2000.
12
Table of Contents
David A. Clark joined the Company in May 2001 and has been Chief Operating Officer of our Pediatrix Division since August 2008 with executive officer responsibilities since January 1, 2009. Mr. Clark served as Senior Vice President, Operations from December 2003 until August 2008, and as Vice President of Operations, South Central Region from November 2001 to November 2003. From June 2000 to October 2001, Mr. Clark was Vice President of Operations for Magella Healthcare, which we acquired in 2001, and prior thereto he was Vice President of Business Development for Magella Healthcare. Mr. Clark is a certified public accountant.
Vivian Lopez-Blanco joined the Company in May 2008 as Vice President and Treasurer and was appointed Chief Financial Officer in January 2010. Prior to joining the Company, from 2003 to 2008, Ms. Lopez-Blanco served as Chief Financial Officer of Carrols Corporation’s Hispanic Restaurants Division, which includes the Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana concepts. Ms. Lopez-Blanco joined Pollo Tropical in 1997 as Controller, was promoted to Chief Financial Officer in 1998 and led the Company through its acquisition by Carrols. Prior to Pollo Tropical, Ms. Lopez-Blanco served in a variety of positions with an international accounting firm. Ms. Lopez-Blanco is a certified public accountant.
Michael D. Stanley, M.D., joined the Company in 1997 and became President of our Pediatrix Division in February 2012. Dr. Stanley previously served as our Regional President, South Central Region for the Pediatrix Division from January 2002 until February 2012 and prior thereto as our Vice President of Medical Operations, South Central Region. Dr. Stanley is board certified in pediatrics and neonatal-perinatal medicine.
Karl B. Wagner joined the Company in May 1997 and became President of our American Anesthesiology Division in January 2010. Mr. Wagner was appointed Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in August 1998 and served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer from August 1998 until December 2009, and as Treasurer from August 1998 until May 2008. Prior to his appointment, Mr. Wagner served as the Company’s Controller. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Wagner was Chief Financial Officer for the East Region of Columbia/HCA’s Ambulatory Surgery Group from January 1995 until May 1997. From July 1993 through January 1995, Mr. Wagner was Assistant Controller of Medical Care International, Inc., a subsidiary of Medical Care America, Inc.
Committees of the Board of Directors
MEDNAX’s Audit Committee held seven meetings in 2012. Messrs. Gabos and Kadre and Dr. Sosa were members of the committee throughout 2012. Mr. Gabos acted as chair of the committee throughout 2012. MEDNAX’s Board of Directors has determined that each of Mr. Gabos and Dr. Sosa qualify as “audit committee financial experts” as defined by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and that each of Messrs. Gabos and Kadre and Dr. Sosa meet the independence requirements under such rules and regulations and for a New York Stock Exchange listed company.
MEDNAX’s Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee setting out the functions that it is to perform. A copy of the Audit Committee Charter is available on our Website at www.mednax.com.
Please refer to the Report of the Audit Committee, which is set forth above, for a further description of our Audit Committee’s responsibilities and its recommendation with respect to our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012.
MEDNAX’s Compensation Committee held six meetings in 2012. Dr. Carlo and Messrs. Fernandez and Kadre were members of the committee throughout 2012. Mr. Fernandez acted as chair of the committee until May 10, 2012, when Mr. Kadre was appointed chair of the committee. MEDNAX’s Board of Directors has determined that each of Dr. Carlo and Messrs. Fernandez and Kadre meet the independence requirements for a New York Stock Exchange listed company.
13
Table of Contents
MEDNAX’s Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee setting out the functions that it is to perform. A copy of the Compensation Committee Charter is available on our Website at www.mednax.com.
The primary purpose of MEDNAX’s Compensation Committee is to assist MEDNAX’s Board of Directors in the discharge of the Board of Directors’ responsibilities relating to compensation of executives. The scope of authority of MEDNAX’s Compensation Committee includes the following:
| • | Evaluating the performance of and setting the compensation for MEDNAX’s Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers; |
| • | Supervising and making recommendations to MEDNAX’s Board of Directors with respect to incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans for executive officers; |
| • | Overseeing the review of the Company’s incentive compensation arrangements to determine whether they encourage excessive risk-taking, including discussing at least annually the relationship between risk management policies and practices and compensation and considering, as appropriate, compensation policies and practices that could mitigate any such risk; |
| • | Evaluating whether or not to engage, retain, or terminate an outside consulting firm for the review and evaluation of MEDNAX’s compensation plans and approving such outside consulting firm’s fees and other retention terms; and |
| • | Conducting an annual performance evaluation of MEDNAX’s Compensation Committee. |
Upon a determination of MEDNAX’s full Compensation Committee membership, matters may be delegated to a subcommittee for evaluation and recommendation back to the full committee. For a description of the role performed by executive officers and compensation consultants in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive and Director compensation, see “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive Compensation Administration.”
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
MEDNAX’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held one meeting in 2012. Drs. Freeman and Sosa and Mr. Fernandez were members of the committee throughout 2012. Dr. Freeman acted as chair of the committee throughout 2012. MEDNAX’s Board of Directors has determined that each of Drs. Freeman and Sosa and Mr. Fernandez meet the independence requirements for a New York Stock Exchange listed company.
MEDNAX’s Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee setting out the functions that it is to perform. A copy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter is available on our Website at www.mednax.com.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board of Directors with respect to nominating new Directors and committee members and taking a leadership role in shaping the corporate governance of MEDNAX. To fulfill its responsibilities and duties, the committee, among other things, reviews the qualifications and independence of existing Directors and new candidates; assesses the contributions of current Directors; identifies and recommends individuals qualified to be appointed to committees of the Board of Directors; considers rotation of committee members; reviews the charters of the committees and makes recommendations to the full Board of Directors with respect thereto; develops and recommends to the Board of Directors corporate governance principles, including a code of business conduct; and evaluates and recommends succession plans for MEDNAX’s Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives.
Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not solicit director nominations, the committee will consider candidates suggested by shareholders in written submissions to MEDNAX’s Secretary in accordance with the procedures described below in the section entitled “Information Concerning Shareholder
14
Table of Contents
Proposals.” In evaluating nominees for Director, the committee does not differentiate between nominees recommended by shareholders and others. In identifying and evaluating candidates to be nominated for Director, the committee reviews the desired experience, mix of skills and other qualities required for appropriate Board composition, taking into account the current Board members and the specific needs of MEDNAX and its Board of Directors. Although the committee does not have a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying Director nominees, the Committee’s review process is designed so that the Board of Directors includes members with diverse backgrounds, skills and experience, and represents appropriate financial, clinical and other expertise relevant to the business of MEDNAX. At a minimum, Director candidates must meet the following qualifications: high personal and professional ethics, integrity and values and a commitment to the representation of the long-term interests of our shareholders. Although the committee’s charter permits the committee to engage a search firm to identify Director candidates, MEDNAX did not pay any third parties a fee to assist in the process of identifying or evaluating Director candidates in 2012.
Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Programs
The Company has reviewed its compensation structures and policies as they pertain to risk and has determined that our compensation programs do not create or encourage the taking of risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions
Review and Approval of Related Person Transactions
MEDNAX has a written policy for the review and approval or ratification of transactions (i) between MEDNAX and any MEDNAX Director or any other entity in which any MEDNAX Director is a Director, officer or has a financial interest; and (ii) in which MEDNAX is or will be a participant and any related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. For purposes of the policy, a related person includes any MEDNAX Director or Director nominee, executive officer or holder of more than 5% of the outstanding voting stock of MEDNAX or any of their respective immediate family members. The policy does not apply to transactions pertaining to (i) director or officer compensation that is approved or recommended to MEDNAX’s Board of Directors for approval by MEDNAX’s Compensation Committee or (ii) the employment by MEDNAX of any immediate family member of a related person in a non-officer position and at compensation levels commensurate with that paid to other similarly situated employees.
Pursuant to the terms of the policy, all covered transactions, if determined to be material by MEDNAX’s General Counsel or if the transaction involves the participation of a member of the MEDNAX Board of Directors, are required to be promptly referred to the disinterested members of the MEDNAX Audit Committee for their review or, if less than a majority of the members of MEDNAX Audit Committee are disinterested, to all the disinterested members of the MEDNAX Board of Directors. Pursuant to the terms of the policy, materiality determinations must be based on the significance of the information to investors in light of all circumstances, including, but not limited to, the (i) relationship of the related persons to the covered transaction, and with each other, (ii) importance to the person having the interest, and (iii) amount involved in the transaction. All transactions involving in excess of $120,000 are automatically deemed to be material pursuant to the terms of the policy.
The disinterested Directors of MEDNAX’s Audit Committee or Board of Directors, as applicable, are required to review such material covered transactions at their next regularly-scheduled meeting, or earlier if a special meeting is called by the Chairman of the Audit Committee and may only approve such a material covered transaction if it has been entered into in good faith and on fair and reasonable terms that are no less favorable to MEDNAX than those that would be available to MEDNAX in a comparable transaction in arm’s length dealings with an unrelated third party at the time it is considered by the disinterested Directors of MEDNAX’s Audit Committee or Board of Directors, as applicable.
15
Table of Contents
All of the transactions described in “Transactions with Related Persons” below were covered transactions under our policy and the policies and procedures required by the policy were followed in connection with the review and approval or ratification of all of such transactions.
Transactions with Related Persons
Mr. Alvarez has served on MEDNAX’s Board of Directors since March 1997. Mr. Alvarez is the Co-Chairman of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., which serves as one of MEDNAX’s outside counsels and receives customary fees for legal services. In 2012, MEDNAX paid Greenberg Traurig, P.A. approximately $1,091,000 for such services and currently anticipates that this relationship will continue.
Deborah Medel-Guerrero, the daughter of Dr. Medel, is employed by MEDNAX as its Vice President, Practice Integration and is responsible for facilitation and coordination of all matters relating to the integration of newly acquired physician practice groups and generally, the start-up of new business opportunities for existing practices. In 2012, MEDNAX paid Ms. Medel-Guerrero $110,077 in salary and provided her certain health and other benefits customarily provided to similarly situated employees. In addition, in 2012, MEDNAX granted Ms. Medel-Guerrero a restricted stock award of 1,937 shares of our common stock with a three-year vesting period, and with other terms that applied to awards granted to other key employees on the same date.
Sandra Medel, the daughter of Dr. Medel, is employed by MEDNAX as Staff Counsel and is responsible for providing legal support and advice in the areas of contracting and litigation. In 2012, MEDNAX paid Ms. Medel $119,075 in salary and bonus and provided her certain health and other benefits customarily provided to similarly situated employees. In addition, in 2012, MEDNAX granted Ms. Medel a restricted stock award of 250 shares of our common stock with a three-year vesting period, and with other terms that applied to awards granted to other key employees on the same date.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
In 2012, none of our executive officers or directors was a member of the board of directors of any other company where the relationship would be considered a compensation committee interlock under the SEC rules.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors determines the compensation for our Chief Executive Officer and other senior executive officers and oversees the administration of our executive compensation programs. The Compensation Committee is composed entirely of independent Directors and is advised as necessary by an independent consultant retained by the Compensation Committee. Our Chief Executive Officer provides advice and recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to the compensation of other senior executive officers. Under the rules of the Securities Exchange Commission, we have determined our named executive officers for purposes of this Proxy Statement to be our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President, American Anesthesiology and President, Pediatrix Division.
2012 Compensation and Performance Overview
Some of the most significant aspects of our performance for 2012 as it relates to our executive compensation include:
| • | As compared to 2011, our net patient service revenue grew by 14.4% to $1.8 billion, our income from operations grew by 9.6% to $389.5 million, our net income grew by 10.5% to $240.9 million, our diluted net income per common and common equivalent share increased to $4.85 from to $4.47 and our cash flow from operating activities increased to $325.7 million from $271.0 million. |
16
Table of Contents
| • | We invested $451.2 million to complete 16 practice acquisitions (including contingent consideration for prior year acquisitions), eight of which were in our American Anesthesiology Division and eight in our Pediatrix Division. |
| • | We expanded our senior credit facility by $300 million to $800 million, with an option to increase to $1 billion, and extended its maturity to 2017, providing us with additional capital to support our growth. |
| • | In 2012, Dr. Medel received an annual equity award with a grant date value of $6.15 million as compared to $4.1 million in 2011, Mr. Calabro received an annual equity award with a grant date value of $3.75 million as compared to $2.45 million in 2011 and Ms. Lopez-Blanco received a salary increase from $325,000 to $375,000 and an annual equity award with a grant date value of $750,000 as compared to $575,000 in 2011. Vesting of each of these equity awards is performance based. |
| • | We achieved income from operations for 2012 that fell within the target goal range set forth in the annual bonus adjustment guidelines established by the Compensation Committee for 2012. As a result, the named executive officers were entitled to receive 112.66% of their target bonus opportunities. |
Executive Compensation Philosophy
The Compensation Committee has designed our executive compensation programs with the following guiding principles in mind:
Quality of Personnel — We are committed to employing the highest quality executive team in the health care services industry. In a challenging business environment, we believe that having highly qualified executive officers is critical for all our constituencies - our patients, hospitals, affiliated clinicians, third-party payors, employees, and shareholders. We expect our executives to be of the highest caliber in terms of business acumen and integrity.
Competitiveness — Our objective is to analyze and understand market forces and practices regarding compensation for executives at similarly situated companies. Our strategy is to establish compensation programs and levels in relation to the external market that best support our corporate strategy.
Alignment of Interests — Our compensation plans for top executives are designed to have strong links to performance achievements, both in terms of operational and financial results as well as in optimizing shareholder value. We evaluate the relationship between compensation cost, shareholder value and company performance on a regular basis. At-risk elements such as cash incentives and stock-based compensation comprise a significant portion of our overall executive remuneration. For incentive plans, we establish performance goals along a wide range of potential performance results so that the level of compensation received appropriately corresponds to the level of performance achieved.
Simplicity and Ease of Administration — Our plans are intended to be simple to understand, document, track and administer. As part of this objective, we attempt to limit the number of separate elements of compensation so that we can easily understand the relationships between programs.
Understanding Objectives and Value — We seek to understand the needs and objectives of our executive officers and, to the degree feasible, reflect those needs and objectives in the programs developed. Additionally, we strive to ensure that executives understand each element and the overall compensation program so that they fully appreciate the value being delivered.
Compliance with Regulatory Guidelines and Sensible Standards of Corporate Governance — We develop our plans in recognition of, and in compliance with, all applicable rules, statutes, regulations and guidelines. Additionally, we monitor our programs on an ongoing basis to ensure they remain in compliance. Program designs reflect relevant considerations in the areas of accounting cost, tax impact, cash flow constraints and other relevant matters. Lastly, we strive to ensure that all programs are appropriate in light of reasonable and sensible standards of good corporate governance.
17
Table of Contents
The Role of Shareholder Advisory Votes on Compensation
At our 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our executive compensation program received the support of 88% of shares that were voted in respect thereof. The Compensation Committee has considered the results of this advisory vote and views this outcome as evidence of shareholder support of our executive compensation decisions and policies. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee has substantially maintained its executive compensation policies for 2013. The Compensation Committee will consider the outcome of future advisory votes in connection with its ongoing evaluation of the Company’s compensation program.
Executive Compensation Administration
In August 2008, the Company entered into Employment Agreements with each of Dr. Medel and Messrs. Calabro and Wagner which superseded certain employment agreements with them from 2004. In February 2010, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Ms. Lopez-Blanco, covering her promotion to Chief Financial Officer in January 2010. In August 2011, we entered into a new Employment Agreement with Dr. Medel which superseded our prior 2008 employment agreement with him. In February 2012, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Michael D. Stanley, M.D., covering his promotion to President, Pediatrix Division. Various aspects of the Employment Agreements that are currently in effect are described in more detail elsewhere in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
Our Compensation Committee makes compensation decisions around program design and pay adjustments in the context of our compensation philosophy, market practices and total compensation objectives. Although external market data, such as peer reviews and other data provided by the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, is an important consideration for the Compensation Committee, it is not the sole determinant of the Company’s practices or executive pay levels. Market positioning for individual elements of compensation and benefits, as well as the relationships among elements, are discussed below. When determining salaries, target bonus opportunities and annual equity grants for named executive officers, the Compensation Committee also considers the Company and individual officer performance, the nature of an individual officer’s role within the Company, internal comparisons to the compensation of other Company officers, tenure with the Company and experience in the officer’s current role.
Although it has no formal policy for a specific allocation between current and long-term compensation, or cash and non-cash compensation, and the variable components of such compensation, the Compensation Committee reviews the pay mix for executive officers as compared to typical market practice. Our annual bonus program serves as a method for properly incentivizing and rewarding our named executive officers for the achievement of desired performance levels. Our long-term compensation program, implemented through a mix of time and performance vesting equity awards, serves as both a retention tool as well as a financial incentive, helping to increase the likelihood that top performers will remain with us long-term and be appropriately rewarded for enhancing long-term shareholder value. The long-term compensation program also serves to align the interests of executive officers with our shareholders. Because of the variable components of our annual bonus program and equity compensation program, the actual compensation realized by our named executive officers may be more or less than the targeted compensation opportunity in any given year. We have no formal policy to either retroactively increase or claw back previously awarded bonuses or vested equity compensation in the event of a restatement of our financial results; however, we anticipate adopting a “clawback” policy consistent with any New York Stock Exchange listing requirements that will be established in the future pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
The Compensation Committee establishes and approves all elements of compensation for the Chief Executive Officer after careful consideration of all factors it deems appropriate, as discussed above. The Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations on compensation actions for the other executive officers based on market data and according to the same philosophy and objectives the Compensation Committee has adopted, (and after the other named executive officers have had an opportunity to review the data and to provide the Chief
18
Table of Contents
Executive Officer with their input). The Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations are then considered for approval by the Compensation Committee, and in some cases are modified by the Compensation Committee during the course of its deliberations.
The Compensation Committee continually reviews executive compensation to ensure that it reflects our compensation philosophy and, as necessary, retains the services of an independent consultant to assist in such review. During 2011, the Compensation Committee retained Pearl Meyer & Partners, L.L.C. (“PMP”), an independent compensation consultant, to provide the Compensation Committee with a market compensation assessment and recommendations with respect to annual cash compensation and total compensation for our Chief Executive Officer and other named executive officers (the “2011 Report”). In addition, in each of 2011 and 2012, PMP advised the Compensation Committee in determining the annual bonus opportunities and guidelines for our named executive officers, which opportunities and guidelines are set forth below under “Annual Bonus.” During its 2011 evaluation of Dr. Medel’s compensation, PMP provided a historical review of his compensation and the Company’s performance relative to peer companies. This information was used by the Compensation Committee during negotiations with Dr. Medel and his representatives that concluded with the execution of Dr. Medel’s current Employment Agreement that became effective on August 7, 2011. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of PMP pursuant to SEC rules and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent PMP from independently advising the Compensation Committee.
The 2011 Report included an evaluation of the market positioning for cash compensation and total compensation and individual pay elements and which, along with input from PMP in 2011 and 2012, and other factors described above, were considered in determining 2012 compensation. Specifically, the reviews covered the following compensation areas:
| • | Cash Compensation: direct cash compensation in the form of base salary and annual bonus. |
| • | Total Compensation: direct cash compensation elements including base salary, annual bonus and long-term incentives (both cash and stock). |
| • | Peer Group Performance Analysis: historical peer group analysis of key financial metrics relevant to base salary levels, our bonus plan and stock-based compensation. |
In conducting the 2011 market assessment, PMP used publicly available year-end 2010 information for 17 public companies in the health care services industry consisting of Tenet Healthcare Corporation, DaVita Inc., Universal Health Services, Inc., Health Management Associates, Inc., Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Kindred Healthcare, Inc., LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. HealthSpring, Inc., Magellan Health Services, Inc., Brookdale Senior Living Inc., HealthSouth Corporation, Lincare Holdings Inc., Amedisys, Inc., Team Health Holdings, Inc., Gentiva Health Services, Inc., Chemed Corporation and AmSurg Corp. PMP advised the Compensation Committee that we ranked at or near the peer group median in terms of both income from operations and enterprise value (market value of equity plus value of debt), the two most relevant comparison factors as determined by the Compensation Committee. In addition, PMP advised the Compensation Committee that we ranked near or above the peer group 75th percentile in areas such as EBITDA margin, adjusted net income and equity market value, five year shareholder return, revenue and earnings growth rates and return on invested capital. An updated evaluation using year-end 2011 information resulted in similar rankings.
The following sections describe the various elements of our executive compensation program, including its objectives, market positioning, structure and operation, and other information specific to 2012 payments, awards, and pay actions.
Each named executive officer is paid a base salary that is reviewed periodically by the Compensation Committee. The current salaries for Messrs. Calabro and Wagner were established in 2008 at the market 75th percentile and have not been increased since that time. Dr. Medel’s current salary was established in 2011 at the
19
Table of Contents
market 75th percentile and was not increased in 2012. Ms. Lopez-Blanco’s initial base salary was established during an arms-length negotiation with the Company’s then current Chief Financial Officer, Karl Wagner, and was approved by the Compensation Committee in connection with her appointment to her current position as Chief Financial Officer. In response to her performance and contributions as Chief Financial Officer during 2010 and 2011, the Chief Executive Officer recommended salary increases for both 2011 and 2012, which were approved by the Compensation Committee. Dr. Stanley’s base salary was set by the Chief Executive Officer and the President and Chief Operating Officer at the time of his promotion to President, Pediatrix Division, based on his role and responsibilities as compared generally to other senior executives within the Company.
The schedule below indicates the annual base salaries of our named executive officers for the periods from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2012:
| Name |
Annual Base Salary (1/1/2010 to 12/31/2012) |
|||
| Roger J. Medel, M.D. (1) |
$ | 950,000/1,000,000 | ||
| Joseph M. Calabro |
600,000 | |||
| Karl B. Wagner |
500,000 | |||
| Vivian Lopez-Blanco (2) |
300,000/375,000 | |||
| Michael D. Stanley, M.D. (3) |
450,000 | |||
| (1) | Dr. Medel’s base salary was increased to $1 million as of August 7, 2011, the date that his current Employment Agreement became effective. |
| (2) | Ms. Lopez-Blanco joined the Company as Vice President and Treasurer in May 2008. She was appointed Chief Financial Officer effective January 1, 2010. Ms Lopez-Blanco’s base salary was increased to $325,000 for 2011 and to $375,000 for 2012. |
| (3) | Reflects only base salary for the period beginning February 13, 2012, when Dr. Stanley became a named executive officer. |
The actual base salaries paid to our named executive officers in 2012, 2011 and 2010, are included in the “Salary” column of the Summary Compensation Table.
In May 2012, our shareholders approved, at the recommendation of our Board of Directors, the MEDNAX, Inc. Amended and Restated 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Amended and Restated Plan”). The purpose of the Amended and Restated Plan is to assist us in attracting, motivating, retaining and rewarding high quality executives and other employees, by enabling them to acquire a proprietary interest in our Company and providing them with annual and long-term incentives to expend their maximum efforts in the creation of shareholder value. The Compensation Committee designed the plan to satisfy the requirements for “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).
Our philosophy is to reward our executive officers for growth in our Company’s results of operations. As such, we target steady increases in income from operations. In March 2012, the Compensation Committee established a 2012 income from operations goal, the achievement of which establishes the maximum bonus award available to each executive officer. This income from operations goal and maximum award amounts were established to comply with Section 162(m) of the Code. The maximum bonus opportunity established by the Compensation Committee as a percentage of base salary was equal to 300% for our Chief Executive Officer, 200% for Messrs. Calabro, Wagner and Ms. Lopez-Blanco and 150% for Dr. Stanley, based upon achievement of a specified level of operating income for 2012. The target bonus opportunity for each named executive officer was equal to 50% of such officer’s maximum bonus opportunity. This reflects the Compensation Committee’s historical practice of establishing income from operations goals that are considered to be reasonably achievable,
20
Table of Contents
but that exceed the prior year’s results. Since this approach was first implemented in 2004, actual bonus payouts for named executive officers have averaged slightly above the targets established by the Compensation Committee, while income from operations growth rates have consistently exceeded those of our industry peers. Since 2004, bonus payouts to officers have been less than 100% of the targets established by the Compensation Committee three times and have exceeded 120% of the targets established by the Compensation Committee only once.
In addition, when the maximum bonus opportunity was established, the Compensation Committee adopted guidelines to be used to adjust the bonuses below the maximum if it determined to exercise its discretion to do so. These bonus adjustment guidelines were designed to be applied based on the actual level of operating income achieved during 2012. These guidelines, together with the maximum bonus opportunities, were designed, considering the then-prevailing economic conditions and regulatory uncertainty, to encourage our executive officers to focus on continuing to manage our business and associated general and administrative expenses and, at a minimum, maintain historical levels of acquisition activity. The bonus adjustment guidelines established for 2012 are set forth in the following table:
| Income from Operations |
Percent of Target Bonus Payment |
|||
| Less than $335,000,000 |
0 | % | ||
| $345,000,000 |
25 | % | ||
| $355,000,000 |
50 | % | ||
| $362,000,000 |
75 | % | ||
| $370,000,000 to 388,000,000 |
100 | % | ||
| $391,000,000 |
125 | % | ||
| $394,000,000 |
150 | % | ||
| $397,000,000 |
175 | % | ||
| $400,000,000 |
200 | % | ||
Following the end of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee determined that our Company’s 2012 income from operations was $389.5 million, which corresponded to a payment of 112.66% of the target bonus payment under the guidelines. In the case of Dr. Stanley, the Compensation Committee delegated authority under the guidelines to the Chief Executive Officer and the President and Chief Operating Officer to determine Dr. Stanley’s bonus, subject to the maximum bonus opportunity approved by the Compensation Committee. In exercising this authority, the Chief Executive Officer and the President and Chief Operating Officer considered the operating performance of the Company’s Pediatrix Division and the Company as a whole for 2012. In considering these factors, the Chief Executive Officer and the President and Chief Operating Officer concluded that Dr. Stanley’s bonus should be equal to 112.66% of his target bonus percentage of 75% of base salary. The amounts of the bonuses are included in the Summary Compensation Table under the column labeled “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”
In March 2013, the Compensation Committee established the 2013 bonus opportunities and guidelines to adjust the bonuses below the maximum opportunity, as it did in 2012, for our named executive officers based upon targeted levels in our anticipated income from operations for 2012. Similarly, the Compensation Committee delegated the authority to the Chief Executive Officer and the President and Chief Operating Officer to determine Dr. Stanley’s bonus for 2013, subject to the maximum bonus opportunity approved by the Compensation Committee. These bonus opportunities were established so that such bonuses, if any, would qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m). The maximum bonus opportunity as a percentage of base salary is the same as that for 2012.
The Compensation Committee typically makes annual equity awards to key employees (other than new hires) around mid-year. At its June 1, 2012 meeting, the Compensation Committee made the annual awards to the named executive officers in the form of restricted stock, as it has done in recent years.
21
Table of Contents
In general, long-term compensation is allocated on the basis of the Compensation Committee’s judgment concerning the cash and equity incentives and time frames that are optimal to maintain our ability to compete for and retain talented leaders. In particular, the Compensation Committee believes that equity grants should provide strong incentives for management to execute our growth strategy which includes expansion into new practice areas. In addition, because our stock option awards provide actual compensation to the recipient only if time vesting requirements are met and our market price increases and because our restricted stock awards contain performance vesting features, our equity awards are particularly well suited to both enhance executive retention and create incentives to increase long-term corporate performance. In 2012, equity awards to our named executive officers consisted entirely of restricted stock. During 2012, the Compensation Committee increased the annual equity grant values for Dr. Medel, Mr. Calabro and Ms. Lopez-Blanco from those made the previous year after consideration of the market references in the 2011 Report and the role and contributions of each such named executive officer. Dr. Stanley’s annual equity grant for 2012 was based on the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer and the President and Chief Operating Officer and approved by the Compensation Committee based on his role, experience in the current role, comparisons to the equity compensation of other officers in the Company and his contributions to the Company. Vesting of each of these awards is performance based. Additional information regarding the grants of equity compensation made to our named executive officers during fiscal year 2012 is included in the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2012 table.
Restricted stock awards are intended to retain key employees, including the named executive officers by providing the opportunity for capital accumulation and more predictable long-term incentive value.
Restricted stock awards are shares of our common stock that are awarded with the restriction that the recipient remains with us throughout the award’s vesting period. Restricted stock awards granted by our Company generally vest at the rate of one-third per year beginning on the first anniversary of the date on which the award is granted and may also be subject to performance-based vesting. The purpose of granting restricted stock awards is to encourage ownership that results in business decisions that build long-term shareholder value and thus stock price appreciation, and encourage retention of our named executive officers. Named executive officers are allowed to vote restricted stock awards as a shareholder based on the number of shares held under restriction. Any dividends declared with respect to any restricted stock awards would be held until the awards vest, at which time the dividends would be paid to the named executive officers. If restricted stock is forfeited, the named executive officer’s rights to receive the dividends declared with respect to that stock would be forfeited as well. At present, the Company does not pay dividends and it has no current intention to do so in the future.
Any unvested restricted stock is generally forfeited upon termination of the employment of the named executive officers. Their Employment Agreements, however, provide that their restricted stock will vest after termination of employment in certain circumstances. In the event of termination of Dr. Medel and Messrs. Calabro and Wagner by the Company without Cause (as defined in his Employment Agreement) or due to executive’s Disability (as defined in his Employment Agreement) or by the executive for Good Reason (as defined in his Employment Agreement), due to the executive’s health becoming impaired to any extent that makes the continued performance of his duties hazardous to the executive’s physical or mental health or life (“Poor Health”) or due to death, all restricted stock granted prior to termination of employment will continue to vest until fully vested. Furthermore, in the event of a Change in Control (as defined in his Employment Agreement), for Dr. Medel and Messrs. Calabro and Wagner, all unvested restricted stock will automatically vest (although Dr. Medel’s RSUs (as defined below) will vest in connection with a Change in Control only if his employment is terminated without Cause or for Good Reason within 24 months following the Change in Control). In the event that Ms. Lopez-Blanco’s or Dr. Stanley’s employment is terminated due to Disability or death, all unvested restricted stock granted to him or her by the Company will continue to vest until fully vested following the termination of his or her employment. In the event that Ms. Lopez-Blanco’s or Dr. Stanley’s
22
Table of Contents
termination date as a result of a Change in Control (as defined in his or her Employment Agreement) occurs within the 12-month period of a Change in Control, any unvested restricted stock will automatically vest.
The Compensation Committee determined that the 2012 annual equity award grants would consist entirely of restricted stock. The Compensation Committee made this determination in order to: (i) provide incentive during periods of market volatility and continuing unfavorable economic conditions (as compared to stock options which may lose incentive value if market prices decline) and (ii) help extend the life of the Amended and Restated Plan by issuing fewer shares of restricted stock than equivalently valued options would require. The restricted stock awards granted to each of the named executive officers by the Compensation Committee for 2012 were subject to performance-based vesting as follows: provided the Company’s net patient service revenue, as determined in accordance with GAAP, for the twelve months ended March 31, 2013 equals or exceeds $1,625,000,000 then the 2012 restricted stock grants will vest in three equal increments on June 1, 2013 (“Increment 1”), June 1, 2014 (“Increment 2”) and June 1, 2015 (“Increment 3”) but if such net patient service revenue does not equal or exceed $1,625,000,000 for such period then Increment 1 will vest on the later of June 1, 2013 or the date that is two weeks after the date on which the Company’s net patient service revenue, as determined in accordance with GAAP, for any twelve consecutive month period commencing on or after May 1, 2012 has been certified by the Compensation Committee to have equaled or exceeded $1,625,000,000 (“Revenue Date”), Increment 2 will vest on the later of June 1, 2014 or the Revenue Date and Increment 3 will vest on the later of June 1, 2015 or the Revenue Date; provided, however, that if the Revenue Date has not occurred by April 14, 2017, then the awards of the 2012 restricted stock grants will terminate and become null and void. The Compensation Committee intends that these restricted stock awards qualify as performance-based compensation that is not subject to the deduction limitations imposed by Section 162(m).
In connection with execution of his current Employment Agreement in 2011, Dr. Medel received a special one-time grant of 87,160 performance-based vesting restricted stock units (“RSUs”), with a grant date fair value of $5.6 million, pursuant to the Company’s 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan in recognition of his agreement to extend his employment with the Company for an additional five years. The RSUs are subject to performance vesting conditions relating to income from operations and will be earned by Dr. Medel in increments of 25% if the Company achieves specified levels of annualized income from operations (on a trailing four quarters basis) as determined in accordance with GAAP. The RSUs will continue to vest in accordance with their terms if Dr. Medel’s employment is terminated by him for Good Reason or if Dr. Medel’s employment is terminated due to Disability, death, Poor Health or without Cause. If Dr. Medel’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by Dr. Medel for Good Reason, in each case within 24 months following a Change in Control, then the RSUs will automatically vest in full upon the date such termination is effective. Any unearned RSUs will be forfeited if our income from operations goals are not achieved as of the year ending December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2012, none of the performance vesting conditions had been met.
| Income From Operations |
Total RSUs Earned | |||
| $390 million |
21,790 (25% of grant) | |||
| $430 million |
43,580 (50% of grant) | |||
| $475 million |
65,370 (75% of grant) | |||
| $525 million |
87,160 (100% of grant) | |||
These goals were determined by the Compensation Committee after consideration of its desired executive retention and shareholder alignment objectives for the special grant. Specifically, the Compensation Committee considered these targets to represent substantial increases in our performance. Compared to the $313 million in income from operations achieved by us in 2010, the $390 million goal represents a 25% increase and the $525 million goal represents a 68% increase. In comparison, the actual aggregate increase in 2012 income from operations over 2010 was 24.5%. For additional information regarding the vesting of the RSUs in connection with the termination of Dr. Medel’s employment, see the “Restricted Stock Awards” section of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
23
Table of Contents
In connection with the execution of his prior Employment Agreement in August 2008, Dr. Medel received two special deferred equity grants (the “Deferred Grants”), one consisting of 75,000 shares of restricted share units (“Deferred Stock”), and the other consisting of 25,000 shares of Deferred Stock, each vesting on the fifth anniversary of the date of grant, but only if certain individual and MEDNAX performance requirements were met. The Compensation Committee has certified that the performance requirements have been met. The Deferred Grants will continue to vest in accordance with their terms if Dr. Medel’s employment is terminated by him for Good Reason. If Dr. Medel incurs a Disability or if his employment is terminated due to death, then the Deferred Grants will vest immediately. In addition, if Dr. Medel’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause, then the Deferred Grants will vest on the date of such termination. The Deferred Grants will also continue to vest in accordance with their terms if Dr. Medel’s employment is terminated due to a Change in Control, provided, that if he terminates his employment within one year after such Change in Control, then the Deferred Grants will vest on such termination date.
The Company has also used stock options to provide a relationship between the long-term value of our stock and the potential financial gain for employees. A stock option becomes valuable only if our common stock price increases above the option exercise price and the holder of the option remains employed during the period required for the option to “vest,” thus providing an incentive for an option holder to remain employed by our Company. In addition, stock options link a portion of an employee’s compensation to shareholders’ interests by providing an incentive to build long-term value, which in turn should result in increases in the market price of our stock. Stock options granted by our Company generally vest and become exercisable over a three-year vesting period.
There is a limited term in which our named executive officers can exercise stock options, known as the “option term.” The option term is generally 10 years from the date of grant. At the end of the option term, the right to purchase any unexercised options expires. Option holders generally forfeit any unvested options if their employment with us terminates.
The terms of the Employment Agreement for each of Dr. Medel and Messrs. Calabro and Wagner, provide that the executive will have the greater of (i) 24 months after termination of employment or (ii) 12 months from the applicable vesting date to exercise any vested non-qualified stock options or vested stock appreciation rights and realize any other vested incentive compensation awards that may be granted under any of the Company’s stock option plans or incentive compensation plans and/or any other similar plan adopted by the Company; provided, however, that in no event may the date be later than the earlier of (i) the latest date upon which the stock right would have expired by its original terms under any circumstances or (ii) the 10th anniversary of the original date of grant of the stock right. In the case of Ms. Lopez-Blanco and Dr. Stanley, each of their Employment Agreements provide that unless he or she is terminated for Cause (as defined in his or her Employment Agreement), he or she will have 180 days after termination of employment to exercise any vested stock options or vested stock appreciation rights and, in the case of Ms. Lopez-Blanco, realize any other vested incentive compensation awards that may be granted under any of the Company’s stock option plans or incentive compensation plans and/or any other similar plan adopted by the Company; provided, however, that in no event may the date be later than the earlier of (i) the latest date upon which the stock right would have expired by its original terms under any circumstances or (ii) the tenth anniversary of the original date of grant of the stock right.
In the event that the employment of Dr. Medel, or Messrs. Calabro or Wagner is terminated by the Company without Cause or due to the executive’s Disability or by the executive for Good Reason, due to the executive’s Poor Health or due to death, all stock options, and stock appreciation rights granted prior to termination will continue to vest until fully vested. For each of Dr. Medel and Messrs. Calabro and Wagner, in the event of a Change in Control, all unvested stock options and stock appreciation rights will automatically vest and become immediately exercisable. In the event that Ms. Lopez-Blanco’s or Dr. Stanley’s termination date as a result of a Change in Control occurs within the 12-month period of a Change in Control, any unvested stock options will automatically vest and become immediately exercisable.
24
Table of Contents
We did not award any stock options to our named executive officers in 2012, 2011 or 2010.
The Compensation Committee determines the effective date of annual equity awards without regard to current or anticipated stock price levels. Although usually made around mid-year, the Compensation Committee may also make, and in the past has made, special grants during the course of the year, primarily for new hires, promotions, to retain valued employees or to reward exceptional performance. These special grants may be subject to performance or time-based vesting, and are issued on the date of grant approval or upon a date certain following the grant approval date.
We follow equity grant procedures designed to promote the proper authorization, documentation and accounting for all equity grants. Pursuant to these procedures the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors must formally approve all equity awards during an in person or telephonic meeting or by the unanimous written consent executed by all members of the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors, as the case may be, it being understood that no equity award granted pursuant to any such written consent may have an effective date earlier than the date that all executed counterparts of such unanimous written consent are delivered to the General Counsel of the Company.
Generally, the exercise price for any equity award, the value of which is based upon a grant-date fair value of our common stock, will be the closing sales price for a share of our common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on the effective date of the grant as approved by the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors, which date may not be prior to either the date such grant was approved or the commencement date of employment of the employee to whom the equity award is being made.
Subject to these policies and procedures, the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors may approve grants of equity awards at any time. However, grants to employees may be effective only on a date within a “trading window” as defined by the Company’s Policy Statement on Inside Information and Insider Trading, as amended from time to time (the “Insider Trading Policy”). For example, a grant approved by the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors during a “black-out” period (as defined in such policy) will be effective on a date during the next “trading window” as determined by the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors on the date such grant is approved.
The Company has not adopted any stock ownership guidelines for its executives or Directors. The Compensation Committee does, however, periodically review the levels of equity ownership by its executives. As of March 12, 2013, Dr. Medel owned shares valued at approximately 38 times his base salary, Mr. Calabro owned shares valued at approximately 17 times his base salary, Mr. Wagner owned shares valued at approximately 10 times his base salary, Ms. Lopez-Blanco owned shares valued at approximately six times her base salary and Dr. Stanley owned shares at approximately four times his base salary. These multiples include unvested restricted stock, but exclude stock options and are based on the closing price of a share of MEDNAX common stock on December 31, 2012.
Our “insiders” can only buy or sell Company stock in accordance with our Insider Trading Policy and our employees generally can only buy or sell Company stock in accordance with our Statement of Policy Prohibiting Insider Trading to All Employees.
Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plans
We maintain a Thrift and Profit Sharing Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), which is a 401(k) plan, to enable eligible employees to save for retirement through a tax-advantaged combination of elective employee contributions and our matching contributions, and provide employees the opportunity to directly manage their retirement plan assets through a variety of investment options. The 401(k) Plan allows eligible employees to elect to contribute from 1% to 60% of their eligible compensation to an investment trust on a pre-tax and/or Roth after-tax basis, up
25
Table of Contents
to the maximum dollar amounts permitted by law. The 401(k) Plan also offers employees the option to voluntarily contribute additional funds on a non-deductible after-tax basis subject to certain limits. In 2012, the maximum employee pre-tax and/or Roth elective contribution to the 401(k) Plan was $17,000, plus an additional $5,500 for employees who were at least 50 years old in 2012. Eligible compensation generally means all wages, salaries and fees for services from the Company, up to a maximum specified amount as determined by the Company. Matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan are discretionary. For 2012, the Company matched 100% of the first 4% of eligible compensation that each eligible participant contributed to the 401(k) Plan on his or her behalf. The portion of an employee’s account under the 401(k) Plan that is attributable to matching contributions vests as follows: 30% after one year of service, 60% after two years of service, and 100% after three years of service. However, regardless of the number of years of service, an employee is fully vested in our matching contributions (and the earnings thereon) if the employee retires at age 65 or later, or terminates employment by reason of death or total and permanent disability. The 401(k) Plan provides for a variety of different investment options, in which the employee’s and the Company’s contributions are invested.
Although the Company maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan, none of the named executive officers participates in that Plan.
The amounts of the Company’s matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan for 2012 for each of the named executive officers is included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.
Other Benefits and Perquisites
We provide our executive officers with certain benefits designed to protect them and their immediate families in the event of illness, disability, or death. We believe it is necessary to provide these benefits in order for us to be successful in attracting and retaining executives in a competitive marketplace, and to provide financial security in these circumstances. Named executive officers are eligible for health and welfare benefits available to similarly situated eligible Company employees during active employment under the same terms and conditions. These benefits include medical, dental, vision, short-term and long-term disability and group-term life insurance coverage.
Pursuant to the terms of their Employment Agreements, Dr. Medel and Messrs. Calabro and Wagner each are entitled to 38 days and Ms. Lopez-Blanco and Dr. Stanley are each entitled to 28 days paid time off each year for vacation, illness, injury, personal days and other similar purposes in accordance with our policies in effect from time to time. Any paid time off not used during a calendar year may be carried over to the next year to the extent permitted under those policies. Dr. Medel and Mr. Calabro each are entitled under their Employment Agreements to utilize the aircraft in which the Company owns or leases a fractional interest for personal travel. Dr. Medel’s personal use of the aircraft may not exceed 95 hours of flight in any calendar year and Mr. Calabro’s personal use of the aircraft may not exceed 50 hours of flight in any calendar year without the consent of the Compensation Committee. The incremental cost to the Company of these benefits for Dr. Medel and Mr. Calabro is included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.
The Compensation Committee has reviewed our perquisites expenditures, and believes they continue to be an important element of the overall compensation package to retain current officers, and in fact command a higher perceived value than the actual cost.
Termination of Employment and Change in Control Agreements
As described in greater detail below, the Employment Agreements between the Company and each of the named executive officers provide for the payment of certain compensation and benefits in the event of the termination of an executive’s employment, the amount of which varies depending upon the reason for such termination. The Compensation Committee has reviewed the essential terms of these termination provisions, and
26
Table of Contents
believes they are reasonable, appropriate, and generally consistent with market practice. Those provisions include a reimbursement by the Company to each of Messrs. Calabro and Wagner of any excise tax imposed upon the executive pursuant to Section 4999 of the Code with respect to any “excess parachute payments,” as that term is defined in Section 280G of the Code, that the executive receives as a result of a Change in Control. In the case of Dr. Medel, his current Employment Agreement provides that, if any amount payable to Dr. Medel in connection with a Change in Control would be subject to excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, then the Company will reduce the payment to an amount equal to the largest portion of such payment that would result in no portion of such payment being subject to excise tax (unless such reduction would result in Dr. Medel receiving, on an after tax basis, an amount lower than the unreduced payment after taking into account all applicable federal, state and local employment taxes, income taxes and excise taxes, in which case the payment amount would not be reduced).
27
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the 2012, 2011 and 2010 compensation for our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and our other named executive officers for the time they were deemed to be named executive officers.
| Name and Principal Position |
Year | Salary | Stock Awards (1) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation |
All Other Compensation |
Total Compensation |
||||||||||||||||||
| Roger J. Medel, M.D. |
2012 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 6,150,005 | $ | 1,689,947 | $ | 159,963 | (4) | $ | 8,999,915 | ||||||||||||
| Chief Executive Officer |
2011 | $ | 969,928 | (2) | $ | 9,699,995 | (3) | $ | 1,455,205 | $ | 307,991 | (4) | $ | 12,433,873 | ||||||||||
| 2010 | $ | 950,000 | $ | 4,100,016 | $ | 1,140,000 | $ | 336,470 | (4) | $ | 6,526,486 | |||||||||||||
| Vivian Lopez-Blanco. Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
2012 2011 2010 |
|
$ $ $ |
375,000 325,000 300,000 |
|
$ $ $ |
750,005 574,993 465,017 |
|
$ $ $ |
422,487 325,000 180,000 |
|
$ $ $ |
13,381 17,241 15,290 |
(5) (5) (5) |
$ $ $ |
1,560,873 1,242,234 960,307 |
| ||||||
| Joseph M. Calabro President and Chief Operating Officer |
|
2012 2011 2010 |
|
$ $ $ |
600,000 600,000 600,000 |
|
$ $ $ |
3,750,025 2,450,001 2,450,007 |
|
$ $ $ |
675,979 600,000 480,000 |
|
$ $ $ |
131,143 139,903 201,207 |
(6) (6) (6) |
$ $ $ |
5,157,147 3,789,904 3,731,214 |
| ||||||
| Karl B. Wagner President, American Anesthesiology |
|
2012 2011 2010 |
|
$ $ $ |
500,000 500,000 500,000 |
|
$ $ $ |
1,625,011 1,624,983 1,625,002 |
|
$ $ $ |
563,316 500,000 400,000 |
|
$ $ $ |
12,991 35,461 34,547 |
(7) (7) (7) |
$ $ $ |
2,701,318 2,660,444 2,559,549 |
| ||||||
| Michael D. Stanley, M.D President, Pediatrix Division |
2012 | $ | 446,548 | (8) | $ | 712,499 | $ | 380,228 | $ | 15,979 | (9) | $ | 1,555,254 | |||||||||||
| (1) | Stock awards consist of performance-based restricted and deferred stock awards. The amounts in this column reflect the grant-date fair value of the restricted and deferred stock awards, calculated in accordance with the accounting guidance for stock-based compensation, but excluding the impact of estimated forfeitures. See the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2012 table for information on restricted stock awards granted in 2012. For information regarding the assumptions made in calculating the amounts reflected in this column, see Note 13, “Stock Incentive Plans and Stock Purchase Plan,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2012 Annual Report to Shareholders. |
| (2) | The salary amount provided in the Summary Compensation Table represents actual paid salary for 2011. Dr. Medel received an increase in base salary effective August 7, 2011. |
| (3) | Reflects restricted stock granted in 2011 as part of the annual equity award valued at $4,099,965 and special, one-time deferred equity grants valued at a total of $5,600,030, which were awarded in connection with Dr. Medel’s 2011 Employment Agreement. For a more detailed description of these stock awards, see the “Restricted Stock Awards” section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. All of these awards are subject to performance-based vesting. |
| (4) | Reflects incremental costs in 2012, 2011 and 2010 of $146,264, $296,295 and $323,124, respectively, for Dr. Medel’s personal use of an aircraft, which MEDNAX owns or leases, in accordance with his Employment Agreement, additional compensation in 2012, 2011 and 2010 of $10,000, $9,800 and $9,800 for 401(k) thrift and profit sharing matching contributions, and costs incurred by MEDNAX of $218, $277 and $399, respectively, for term life insurance coverage. Also includes costs incurred by MEDNAX in 2012, 2011 and 2010 for spousal travel to and entertainment (recreational activities) at MEDNAX’s annual board retreats which do not exceed the greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total amount of perquisites and personal benefits received in any year. |
| (5) | Reflects additional compensation of $10,000, $9,800 and $9,800 for 401(k) thrift and profit sharing matching contributions in 2012, 2011 and 2010 and other compensation of $336, $335 and $366, respectively, for term life insurance coverage in 2012, 2011 and 2010. Also includes costs incurred by MEDNAX in 2012, 2011 and 2010 for spousal travel to and entertainment (recreational activities) at MEDNAX’s annual board retreat which does not exceed the greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total amount of perquisites and personal benefits received in any year. |
| (6) | Reflects incremental costs in 2012, 2011 and 2010 of $120,807, $129,767 and $191,008, respectively, for Mr. Calabro’s personal use of an aircraft, which MEDNAX owns or leases, in accordance with his Employment Agreement, additional compensation in 2012, 2011 and 2010 of $10,000, $9,800 and $9,800 for 401(k) thrift and profit sharing matching contributions, and costs incurred by MEDNAX in 2012, 2011 and 2010 of $336, $336 and $399, respectively, for term life insurance coverage. Also includes costs incurred by MEDNAX in 2009 for spousal travel to and entertainment (recreational activities) at the MEDNAX board retreat which do not exceed the greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total amount of perquisites and personal benefits received in that year. |
| (7) | Reflects incremental costs in 2011 and 2010 of $15,743 and $15,466 for Mr. Wagner’s share of personal travel on an aircraft, which MEDNAX owns or leases, which use of such aircraft occurred during travel with either Dr. Medel or Mr. Calabro under the terms of each executive’s Employment Agreement, additional compensation in 2012, 2011 and 2010 of $10,000, $9,800 and $9,800 for 401(k) thrift and profit sharing matching contributions and $336, 336 and $399, respectively, for term life insurance coverage. Also includes costs incurred by MEDNAX in 2012, 2011 and 2010 for spousal travel to and entertainment (recreational activities) at MEDNAX’s annual board retreat which does not exceed the greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total amount of perquisites and personal benefits received in any year. |
| (8) | The salary amount provided in the Summary Compensation Table represents actual paid salary for 2012. Dr. Stanley became a named executive officer in 2012 and received an increase in base salary effective February 13, 2012. |
| (9) | Reflects incremental costs of $3,240 for Dr. Stanley’s share of personal travel on an aircraft, which MEDNAX owns or leases, which use of such aircraft occurred during travel with either Dr. Medel or Mr. Calabro under the terms of each executive’s Employment Agreement, additional compensation of $10,000 for 401(k) thrift and profit sharing matching contributions and $218 for term life insurance coverage. Also includes costs incurred by MEDNAX for spousal travel to and entertainment (recreational activities) at MEDNAX’s annual board retreat which does not exceed the greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total amount of perquisites and personal benefits received in that year. |
28
Table of Contents
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2012
| Name |
Grant Date |
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1) |
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (Shares) |
Grant- Date Fair Value of Stock Awards (3) |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Roger J. Medel, M.D. |
6/1/12 | 102,483 | (2) | $ | 6,150,005 | |||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 0 | $ | 1,500,000 | $ | 3,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Vivian Lopez-Blanco |
6/1/12 | 12,498 | (2) | $ | 750,005 | |||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 0 | $ | 375,000 | $ | 750,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Joseph M. Calabro |
6/1/12 | 62,490 | (2) | $ | 3,750,025 | |||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 0 | $ | 600,000 | $ | 1,200,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Karl B. Wagner |
6/1/12 | 27,079 | (2) | $ | 1,625,011 | |||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 0 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 1,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Michael D. Stanley, M.D. |
6/1/12 | 11,873 | (2) | $ | 712,499 | |||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 0 | $ | 337,500 | $ | 675,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | These columns reflect the range of payouts for 2012 annual cash bonuses under the MEDNAX, Inc. Amended and Restated 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan. Amounts actually earned in 2012 are reported as Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation in the Summary Compensation Table. For a more detailed description of the annual cash awards, see the section entitled “Annual Bonuses” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. |
| (2) | Represents restricted stock awards granted under the MEDNAX, Inc. 2008 Amended and Restated Incentive Compensation Plan. The restricted stock awards for all of the named executive officers vest as follows: if the Company’s net patient service revenue, as determined in accordance with GAAP, for the twelve months ended March 31, 2013, equals or exceeds $1,625,000,000, then each of the named executive officers’ restricted shares will vest in three equal increments on June 1, 2013, (“Increment 1”), June 1, 2014 (“Increment 2”) and June 1, 2015 (“Increment 3”). If, however, net patient service revenue does not equal or exceed $1,625,000,000 for that period, then Increment 1 will vest on the later of June 1, 2013, or the date that is two weeks after the date on which the Company’s net patient service revenue, as determined in accordance with GAAP, for any 12 consecutive month period commencing on or after May 1, 2012, equals or exceeds $1,625,000,000 (the “Revenue Date”), Increment 2 will vest on the later of June 1, 2014 or the Revenue Date and Increment 3 will vest on the later of June 1, 2015 or the Revenue Date; provided, however, that if the Revenue Date has not occurred by April 14, 2017, then the restricted shares shall terminate and become null and void. For a more detailed description of our restricted stock and restricted stock granting policies, see the sections entitled “Restricted Stock Awards” and “Equity Grant Practices” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. |
| (3) | The grant-date fair value of the restricted stock awards is determined pursuant to the accounting guidance for stock-based compensation and represents the total amount that we will expense in our financial statements over the relevant vesting periods. For information regarding the assumptions made in calculating the amounts reflected in this column, see Note 13, “Stock Incentive Plans and Stock Purchase Plan,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2012 Annual Report to Shareholders. |
29
Table of Contents
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2012 Fiscal Year-End
| Name |
Option Awards | Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Securities Underlying Options Exercisable |
Option Exercise Price |
Option Expiration Date |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Yet Vested |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Yet Vested (1) |
||||||||||||||||
| Roger J. Medel, M.D. |
72,048 | (2) | $ | 12.90 | 04/02/2013 | 75,000 | (8) | $ | 5,964,000 | |||||||||||
| 200,000 | (3) | $ | 30.99 | 05/20/2014 | 25,000 | (8) | $ | 1,988,000 | ||||||||||||
| 62,500 | (4) | $ | 44.70 | 06/01/2016 | 24,867 | (9) | $ | 1,977,424 | ||||||||||||
| 50,000 | (5) | $ | 56.05 | 08/10/2017 | 37,530 | (10) | $ | 2,984,386 | ||||||||||||
| 125,000 | (6) | $ | 55.43 | 06/02/2018 | 87,160 | (11) | $ | 6,930,963 | ||||||||||||
| 102,483 | (12) | $ | 8,149,448 | |||||||||||||||||
| Vivian Lopez-Blanco |
20,000 | (7) | $ | 50.28 | 05/27/2018 | 2,820 | (9) | $ | 224,246 | |||||||||||
| 5,263 | (10) | $ | 418,514 | |||||||||||||||||
| 12,498 | (12) | $ | 993,841 | |||||||||||||||||
| Joseph M. Calabro |
31,250 | (4) | $ | 44.70 | 06/01/2016 | 14,859 | (9) | $ | 1,181,588 | |||||||||||
| 37,500 | (5) | $ | 56.05 | 08/10/2017 | 22,426 | (10) | $ | 1,783,316 | ||||||||||||
| 75,000 | (6) | $ | 55.43 | 06/02/2018 | 62,490 | (12) | $ | 4,969,205 | ||||||||||||
| Karl B. Wagner |
23,437 | (4) | $ | 44.70 | 06/01/2016 | 9,856 | (9) | $ | 783,749 | |||||||||||
| 28,125 | (5) | $ | 56.05 | 08/10/2017 | 14,874 | (10) | $ | 1,182,780 | ||||||||||||
| 50,000 | (6) | $ | 55.43 | 06/02/2018 | 27,079 | (12) | $ | 2,153,322 | ||||||||||||
| Michael D. Stanley, M.D. |
— | — | — | 2,820 | (9) | $ | 224,246 | |||||||||||||
| 4,256 | (10) | $ | 338,437 | |||||||||||||||||
| 11,873 | (12) | $ | 944,141 | |||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Based on a stock price of $79.52, which was the closing price of a share of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on December 31, 2012. |
| (2) | These stock options vested in three equal installments on each of April 2, 2004, April 2, 2005 and April 2, 2006. |
| (3) | These stock options vested in three equal installments on each of November 20, 2004, November 20, 2005 and November 20, 2006. |
| (4) | These stock options vested in three equal installments on each of June 1, 2007, June 1, 2008 and June 1, 2009. |
| (5) | These stock options vested in three equal installments on each of June 1, 2008, June 1, 2009 and June 1, 2010. |
| (6) | These stock options vested in three equal installments on each of June 1, 2009, June 1, 2010 and June 1, 2011. |
| (7) | These stock options vested in three equal installments on May 27, 2010, May 27, 2011 and May 27, 2012. |
| (8) | These deferred stock awards vest on August 20, 2013. For a more detailed description of these deferred stock awards, see the “Restricted Stock Awards” section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. |
| (9) | These restricted stock awards vest on June 1, 2013. |
| (10) | These restricted stock awards vest in two equal installments on each of June 1, 2013 and June 1, 2014. |
| (11) | These deferred stock awards vest in increments of 25 percent if the Company achieves specified levels of annualized income from operations (on a trailing four quarters basis), as determined in accordance with GAAP, as follows: $390 million, $430 million, $475 million and $525 million; provided, however that if the Company’s income from operations goals are not achieved as of the year ending December 31, 2018, any unvested deferred stock awards shall terminate and become null and void. |
30
Table of Contents
| (12) | These restricted stock awards vest as follows: if the Company’s net patient service revenue, as determined in accordance with GAAP, for the twelve months ended March 31, 2013, equals or exceeds $1,625,000,000, then each of the named executive officers’ restricted shares will vest in three equal increments on June 1, 2013, (“Increment 1”), June 1, 2014 (“Increment 2”) and June 1, 2015 (“Increment 3”). If, however, net patient service revenue does not equal or exceed $1,625,000,000 for that period, then Increment 1 will vest on the later of June 1, 2013, or the date that is two weeks after the date on which the Company’s net patient service revenue, as determined in accordance with GAAP, for any 12 consecutive month period commencing on or after May 1, 2012, equals or exceeds $1,625,000,000 (the “Revenue Date”), Increment 2 will vest on the later of June 1, 2014 or the Revenue Date and Increment 3 will vest on the later of June 1, 2015 or the Revenue Date; provided, however, that if the Revenue Date has not occurred by April 14, 2017, then the award of the restricted shares shall terminate and become null and void. |
Options Exercised and Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 2012
| Name |
Option Awards | Stock Awards (1) | ||||||||||||||
| Number of Shares Acquired Upon Exercise |
Value Realized on Exercise (2) |
Number of Shares Acquired Upon Vesting |
Value of Shares Acquired Upon Vesting (3) |
|||||||||||||
| Roger J. Medel, M.D. |
50,000 | $ | 2,686,555 | 76,295 | $ | 4,654,758 | ||||||||||
| Vivian Lopez-Blanco |
— | $ | — | 9,152 | $ | 558,364 | ||||||||||
| Joseph M. Calabro |
— | $ | — | 45,592 | $ | 2,781,568 | ||||||||||
| Karl B. Wagner |
— | $ | — | 30,239 | $ | 1,844,881 | ||||||||||
| Michael D. Stanley, M.D. |
25,478 | $ | 510,411 | 8,649 | $ | 527,675 | ||||||||||
| (1) | These columns reflect restricted stock awards previously awarded to the named executive officer that vested during 2012. |
| (2) | Calculated based on the sales price received by the named executive officer upon the sale of the shares of MEDNAX common stock acquired upon the exercise of such stock options less the exercise price of such options. |
| (3) | Calculated based on the closing price of a share of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the vesting date. |
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
In August 2011, the Company entered into a new Employment Agreement with Dr. Medel that replaced his previous Employment Agreement entered into in August 2008. In August 2008, the Company entered into Employment Agreements with each of Messrs. Calabro and Wagner. The Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Ms. Lopez-Blanco in 2010. In addition, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Dr. Stanley in 2012. Each of these Employment Agreements provides for the Company to make certain payments and provide certain benefits to the executive upon termination of employment with the Company. Those provisions are summarized below.
Termination by Company for Cause. In the event that an executive’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company for Cause, then the Company will pay the executive his or her base salary through the termination date at the rate in effect at the termination date and reimburse the executive for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination.
The term “Cause” is defined in each of the Employment Agreements for Dr. Medel and Messrs. Calabro and Wagner to mean the executive’s (i) engagement in (A) willful misconduct resulting in material harm to the Company, or (B) gross negligence; (ii) conviction of, or pleading nolo contendere to, a felony or any other crime involving fraud, financial misconduct, or misappropriation of the Company’s assets; (iii) willful and continual failure, after written notice, to (A) perform substantially his employment duties consistent with his position and
31
Table of Contents
authority, or (B) follow, consistent with his position, duties, and authorities, the reasonable lawful mandates of his supervisor; or (iv) breach of the requirements of his employment agreement with respect to the Company’s confidential information. For purposes of this definition, acts or omissions taken by the executive in a good faith belief that they were in the best interests of the Company or if done at the express direction of the Company’s Board of Directors will not be deemed willful or grossly negligent. In each of the Employment Agreements for Ms. Lopez-Blanco and Dr. Stanley, the term “Cause” is defined to mean (i) any act or omission of the executive which is materially contrary to the business interests, reputation or goodwill of the Company; (ii) a material breach by the executive of his or her obligations under the Employment Agreement, which breach is not promptly remedied upon written notice from the Company; (iii) the executive’s refusal to perform his or her duties as assigned pursuant to the Employment Agreement other than a refusal which is remedied by the executive promptly after receipt of written notice thereof by the Company; or (iv) the executive’s failure or refusal to comply with a reasonable policy, standard or regulation of the Company in any material respect.
Termination by Executive due to Poor Health or due to Executive’s Death. In the event that an executive terminates his or her employment because of Poor Health or the executive’s employment terminates because of his or her death, then the Company will pay to the executive (or his or her estate) his or her base salary to the termination date, pay the executive a pro rata portion of the bonus that the executive would have received had his or her employment not terminated (as determined in accordance with the Employment Agreement) and reimburse the executive for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination. In addition, if the executive terminates his or her employment due to Poor Health, the executive will receive any disability payments otherwise payable under any plans provided by the Company.
Termination due to Disability. If the Company terminates the employment of Dr. Medel, Messrs. Calabro or Wagner by reason of his Disability, then the Company will continue to pay Dr. Medel and Messrs. Calabro or Wagner base salary for a period of 12 months after the termination date and the actual performance bonus, on a pro rata basis, that would have been payable to the executive for the fiscal year if the executive had not been terminated. If the Company terminates the employment of Ms. Lopez-Blanco or Dr. Stanley by reason of his or her Disability, the Company will pay the executive 50% of his or her base salary for a period of six months after the termination date and the actual performance bonus, on a pro rata basis, that would have been payable to the executive for the fiscal year if he or she had not been terminated.
Termination by Company without Cause or by Executive for Good Reason or due to Change in Control. If the Company terminates the employment of Dr. Medel, Messrs. Calabro or Wagner without Cause (which requires not less than 90 days’ notice), or Messrs. Calabro or Wagner terminates his employment for any reason within one year after a Change in Control, the Company terminates the employment of Messrs. Calabro or Wagner within 24 months following a Change in Control, or Dr. Medel, Messrs. Calabro or Wagner terminates his employment for Good Reason, then the Company will (a) pay that executive’s base salary through the termination date plus any reimbursement owed to that executive for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination, (b) continue to pay the executive’s base salary for a period of 24 months after the termination date, (c) on the first and second anniversaries of the termination date, pay the executive an amount equal to the greater of his “average annual performance bonus” or his bonus for the year immediately preceding his termination and (d) pay the executive a pro rata portion of the bonus he would have received for the year in which his employment terminates. If the termination is due to a Change in Control, then the performance bonuses referred to in (c) above would be paid to the executive in a lump sum within 90 days of the termination date. If the Company terminates the employment of Dr. Medel without Cause or Dr. Medel terminates his employment for Good Reason in either case within 24 months following a Change in Control, the Company will pay his base salary through the termination date plus any reimbursement owed to him for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination and continue to pay Dr. Medel’s base salary for 36 months after the termination date and, within 90 days following such termination date, an amount equal to three times the greater of his “average annual performance bonus” or his bonus for the year immediately preceding his termination. For this purpose, “average annual performance bonus” means the average of the executive’s earned performance bonus as a percentage of base salary for the three years preceding such termination date, multiplied by the
32
Table of Contents
executive’s base salary at the time of termination. If Ms. Lopez-Blanco or Dr. Stanley terminates his or her employment for Good Reason (other than, in the case of Ms. Lopez-Blanco, a Change in Control Good Reason, as defined below), then the Company will (a) pay him or her base salary through the termination date plus any reimbursement owed to him or her for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination, (b) continue to pay him or her base salary for a period of six months (12 months if termination is in connection with a Change in Control) after the termination date, and (c) pay him or her a pro rata portion of the performance bonus he or she would have received for the year in which his or her employment terminates, subject to reduction in order to avoid such payments being deemed “excess parachute payments,” as that term is defined in Section 280G of the Code. If Ms. Lopez-Blanco terminates her employment for a Change in Control Good Reason, then the Company will pay her the performance bonus she would have received for the year in which her employment terminates as if she had worked for the entire fiscal year and met all goals and objectives of such year. If the Company terminates the employment of Ms. Lopez-Blanco or Dr. Stanley without Cause, then the Company will (a) pay his or her base salary through the termination date plus any reimbursement owed to him or her for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination, (b) continue to pay his or her base salary for a period of 12 months after the termination date, (c) pay him or her a pro rata portion of the performance bonus he or she would have received for the year in which his or her employment terminates, and (d) within 30 days of the first anniversary of the termination date, pay him or her an amount equal to his or her “average annual performance bonus.” For this purpose, “average annual performance bonus” means (i) the average of the performance bonuses paid to the executive in his or her current position for the three full calendar years prior to the termination date or (ii) in the event that a three year average cannot be determined, the executive’s bonus in his or her current position for the year immediately preceding his or her termination. For purposes of this definition, “Good Reason” will not be deemed to exist unless the executive provides the Company with written notice of the existence of such condition within 90 days after the initial existence of the condition and the Company fails to remedy the condition within 30 days after its receipt of such notice.
The Employment Agreement for each of Dr. Medel and Messrs. Calabro and Wagner defines “Good Reason” to mean (i) a material diminution in the executive’s base salary or performance bonus eligibility; (ii) a material diminution in the executive’s authority, duties, or responsibilities; (iii) a material diminution in the authority, duties or responsibilities of the supervisor to whom the executive is required to report, including, in the case of the Chief Executive Officer, a requirement that Dr. Medel report to a corporate officer or employee instead of reporting directly to the Board of Directors of the Company; (iv) a material diminution in the budget over which the executive retains authority; (v) a material change in the geographic location at which the executive must perform the services under his Employment Agreement; or (vi) any other action or inaction that constitutes a material breach by the Company under his Employment Agreement. The Employment Agreement for each of Ms. Lopez-Blanco and Dr. Stanley defines “Good Reason” to mean (i) a decrease in the executive’s base salary; (ii) a decrease in the performance bonus potential utilized by the Company in determining a performance bonus for the executive; (iii) within a one year period after a Change in Control, the executive is either (a) assigned any position, duties, responsibilities or compensation that are significantly diminished when compared with his or her position, duties, responsibilities or compensation prior to such Change in Control, or (b) forced to relocate to another location more than 25 miles from the Company’s location prior to the Change in Control (each of (iii)(a) and (b) a “Change in Control Good Reason”); (iv) the assignment to the executive of any officer position inconsistent with his or her present position other than any isolated, insubstantial and inadvertent action not taken in bad faith and which is remedied by the Company promptly after receipt of written notice; (v) the requirement by the Company that the executive be based in any office or location outside of the metropolitan area where the Company’s present corporate offices are located, except for travel reasonably required in the performance of the executive’s duties; (vi) (in the case of Ms. Lopez-Blanco), a material diminution in Ms. Lopez-Blanco’s authority, duties or responsibilities; or (vii) (in the case of Ms. Lopez-Blanco), any other action or inaction that constitutes a material breach by the Company under Ms. Lopez-Blanco’s Employment Agreement.
The term “Change in Control” is defined in each executive’s Employment Agreement to mean (i) the acquisition by a person or an entity or a group of persons and entities, directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of
33
Table of Contents
the Company’s common stock in a single transaction or a series of transactions (hereinafter referred to as a “50% Change in Control”); (ii) a merger or other form of corporate reorganization resulting in an actual or de facto 50% Change in Control; or (iii) the failure of Applicable Directors to constitute a majority of the Company’s Board of Directors during any two (2) consecutive year period after the date of each of the executive’s Employment Agreement (the “Two-Year Period”). “Applicable Directors” means those individuals who are members of the Company’s Board of Directors at the inception of the Two-Year Period and any new Director whose election to the Board of Directors or nomination for election to the Board of Directors was approved (prior to any vote thereon by the shareholders) by a vote of at least two-thirds of the Directors then still in office who either were Directors at the beginning of the Two-Year Period at issue or whose election or nomination for election during such Two-Year Period was previously approved as provided in this sentence.
Termination by Executive. An executive may terminate his or her employment, other than for Good Reason or due to a Change in Control, upon 90 days’ notice to the Company, or in the case of Dr. Stanley, upon 45 days’ notice. In such event, the Company will continue to pay the executive his or her base salary through the termination date, and in the case of Dr. Medel and Messrs. Calabro and Wagner, if in connection with such termination the executive gives sufficient notice and executes a general release of the Company, then the Company will pay the executive a pro rata portion of the bonus that the executive would have received had his employment not terminated (as determined in accordance with his Employment Agreement). In addition, the Company will reimburse each executive for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination. If the Company specifies a termination date for the employment of Dr. Medel, Messrs. Calabro or Wagner or Ms. Lopez-Blanco that is less than 90 days (45 days in the case of Dr. Stanley), as applicable after the Company’s receipt of written notice of such termination from the executive, then the Company will continue to pay to the executive his or her base salary for a period ending on such 90th day (45th day in the case of Dr. Stanley).
Employment Transition and Severance Agreement. If the Company so requests within five business days following a termination of the employment of Dr. Medel, Messrs. Calabro or Wagner by reason of the executive’s Disability, termination by the Company without Cause, termination by the executive due to Poor Health, or termination by the executive for Good Reason, then the executive will continue to be employed by the Company on a part-time basis for a period (the “transition period”) to be determined by the Company of up to 90 days, unless extended by mutual agreement. During this transition period, the executive is required to perform such services as may reasonably be required for the transition to others of matters previously within the executive’s responsibilities. Unless otherwise mutually agreed, the executive will not be required to serve more than five days per month during the transition period. For services during the transition period, the executive will be compensated at a daily rate equal to his base salary immediately prior to the termination of his employment divided by 365.
Continuation of Group Health Coverage. The Employment Agreement for each of Dr. Medel and Messrs. Calabro and Wagner also provides for the continuation in any self-insured, group health plan sponsored by the Company as if the executive were still an employee of the Company during any severance period or transition period. For this purpose, “severance period” means the period after the termination date during which the executive continues to receive base salary payments following the termination of employment as described above. In addition, upon termination of the executive’s employment for any reason (in the case of Dr. Medel or, in the case of the other executives for any reason other than Cause) and only if the executive and his eligible dependants first irrevocably decline any continuation coverage provided pursuant to the applicable provisions in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, the executive and his eligible dependents will be entitled to elect to continue in any self-insured, group health plan sponsored by the Company as if the executive were still an employee of the Company (the “Enhanced Coverage”), during a period of five years following the later of the termination date, the end of the severance period or the end of the transition period. In its sole discretion, the Company may provide health care insurance to the executive and his eligible dependants through one or several insurance carriers selected by the Company in lieu of the Enhanced Coverage (the “Alternate Enhanced Coverage”), provided the coverage is substantially comparable. The executive will pay the full cost of the Enhanced Coverage or the cost of the Alternate Enhanced Coverage, up to the cost of the plan for such period of coverage for similarly situated employees and covered beneficiaries.
34
Table of Contents
Payments in the Event of a Change in Control. The Employment Agreement for each of Messrs. Calabro and Wagner requires the Company to increase or “gross-up” any amounts payable to an executive that are contingent upon a Change in Control by an amount that will reimburse the executive, on an after-tax basis, for any excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code, on any amounts that are deemed to be “excess parachute payments,” and for any interest or penalties incurred by an executive with respect to any such excise tax.
Vesting of Equity Awards. The Employment Agreement for each of Dr. Medel and Messrs. Calabro and Wagner provides that all unvested stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other stock based awards granted to an executive by the Company (other than Dr. Medel’s Deferred Grants) will continue to vest until fully vested following the termination of an executive’s employment due to Disability, termination without Cause, Good Reason, Poor Health or death. In addition, in the event of a Change in Control, for each of Dr. Medel and Messrs. Calabro and Wagner, such awards will automatically vest and, in the case of stock options and stock appreciation rights, become immediately exercisable. In the event Ms. Lopez-Blanco’s or Dr. Stanley’s employment is terminated due to Disability or death, all unvested stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other stock based awards granted to her by the Company will continue to vest until fully vested following the termination of her employment. Further, in the event Ms. Lopez-Blanco’s or Dr. Stanley’s termination date as a result of a Change in Control occurs within the 12 month period of a Change in Control, any unvested stock options, unvested restricted stock and, in the case of Ms. Lopez-Blanco, any unvested stock appreciation rights and other unvested incentive compensation awards, held by the executive on the termination date will automatically vest and, in the case of stock options, become immediately exercisable. In the case of Dr. Medel’s Deferred Grants received in 2008, however, they will continue to vest in accordance with their terms if Dr. Medel’s employment is terminated by him for Good Reason. If Dr. Medel incurs a Disability or if his employment is terminated due to death, or, because the performance vesting threshold with respect to the Deferred Grants has been met, if Dr. Medel’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause, then the Deferred Grants will vest immediately. The Deferred Grants will also continue to vest in accordance with their terms if Dr. Medel’s employment is terminated due to a Change in Control, provided, that if he terminates his employment within one year after such Change in Control, then the Deferred Grants will vest on such termination. In the case of Dr. Medel’s RSUs received in connection with his current Employment Agreement in 2011, the RSUs will continue to vest in accordance with their terms if Dr. Medel’s employment is terminated by him for Good Reason or if Dr. Medel’s employment is terminated due to Disability, death, Poor Health or without Cause. If Dr. Medel’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by Dr. Medel for Good Reason, in each case within 24 months following a Change in Control, then the RSUs will automatically vest in full upon the date such termination is effective.
Payments of Unused Leave Time. In accordance with the Company’s paid time off policies, an executive officer will be paid any earned but unused paid time off upon termination. This payment will occur in all termination events. In addition to the leave time that the executive accrues in any year, such executive may carry forward fifteen days of leave time from the prior year; therefore, the maximum payout upon termination for each executive would be the value of such executive’s contracted annual leave time plus fifteen carry-over days.
Restrictive Covenants. Pursuant to his or her Employment Agreement, each executive officer is subject to certain restrictive covenants that survive termination of employment. If the executive fails to comply with any of those restrictive covenants, he or she will not be entitled to receive any further payments or benefits as a result of the termination of his or her employment (other than his or her base salary through the date of termination and reimbursement of any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination). In addition, the Company then will have the right to terminate without advance notice any future payments and benefits of every kind that otherwise would be due to the executive on account of his or her termination of employment.
35
Table of Contents
The following tables illustrate the payments and benefits that each of Drs. Medel and Stanley, Messrs. Calabro and Wagner and Ms. Lopez-Blanco would have received under his or her Employment Agreement if his or her employment with the Company had terminated for any of the reasons described above on December 31, 2012. The amounts presented in the tables, reflect compensation (including equity ownership) at such year end, are estimates only and do not necessarily reflect the actual value of the payments and other benefits that would be received by the named executive officers, which would only be known at the time that employment actually terminates.
| TRIGGERING EVENT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive |
Compensation |
Change in Control |
By Executive without Good Reason |
By Company for Cause |
By Company without Cause |
By Executive for Good Reason |
By the Company by Reason of Executive’s Disability |
By Executive Due to Poor Health or Due to Executive’s Death |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Roger J. Medel, M.D |
Cash Severance (1) | $ | 8,170,960 | $ | 1,689,947 | $ | — | (5) | $ | 7,469,947 | $ | 7,469,947 | $ | 2,689,947 | $ | 1,689,947 | ||||||||||||||
| Long-term Incentives (6) | 27,994,221 | — | — | 20,042,221 | 20,042,221 | 27,994,221 | 27,994,221 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Compensation (7) | 198,000 | 198,000 | 198,000 | 198,000 | 198,000 | 198,000 | 198,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Benefit to Employee | $ | 36,363,181 | $ | 1,887,947 | $ | 198,000 | $ | 27,710,168 | $ | 27,710,168 | $ | 30,882,168 | $ | 29,882,168 | ||||||||||||||||
| Vivian Lopez-Blanco |
Cash Severance (2) | $ | 797,487 | $ | — | $ | — | (5) | $ | 1,122,487 | $ | 609,987 | $ | 609,987 | $ | 422,487 | ||||||||||||||
| Long-term Incentives (8) | 1,636,601 | — | — | — | — | 1,636,601 | 1,636,601 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Benefit to Employee | $ | 2,434,088 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,122,487 | $ | 609,987 | $ | 2,246,588 | $ | 2,059,088 | ||||||||||||||||
| Joseph M. Calabro |
Cash Severance (2) | $ | 3,399,979 | $ | 675,979 | $ | — | (5) | $ | 3,399,979 | $ | 3,399,979 | $ | 1,275,979 | $ | 675,979 | ||||||||||||||
| Long-term Incentives (3) | 7,934,109 | — | — | 7,934,109 | 7,934,109 | 7,934,109 | 7,934,109 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Section 280G Gross-up (4) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Benefit to Employee | $ | 11,334,088 | $ | 675,979 | $ | — | $ | 11,334,088 | $ | 11,334,088 | $ | 9,210,088 | $ | 8,610,088 | ||||||||||||||||
| Karl B. Wagner |
Cash Severance (2) | $ | 2,833,316 | $ | 563,316 | $ | — | (5) | $ | 2,833,316 | $ | 2,833,316 | $ | 1,063,316 | $ | 563,316 | ||||||||||||||
| Long-term Incentives (3) | 4,119,851 | — | — | 4,119,851 | 4,119,851 | 4,119,851 | 4,119,851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Section 280G Gross-up (4) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Benefit to Employee | $ | 6,953,167 | $ | 563,316 | $ | — | $ | 6,953,167 | $ | 6,953,167 | $ | 5,183,167 | $ | 4,683,167 | ||||||||||||||||
| Michael D. Stanley, M.D. |
Cash Severance (2) | $ | 825,228 | $ | — | $ | — | (5) | $ | 1,003,728 | $ | 602,728 | $ | 602,728 | $ | 380,228 | ||||||||||||||
| Long-term Incentives (8) | 1,506,824 | — | — | — | — | 1,506,824 | 1,506,824 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Benefit to Employee | $ | 2,332,052 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,003,728 | $ | 602,728 | $ | 2,109,552 | $ | 1,887,052 | ||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Cash severance includes: (i) in the case of a termination by the executive without Good Reason, base salary through the date of termination, the actual performance bonus, on a pro rata basis, that would have been payable to executive for the fiscal year, as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table, if executive had not been terminated so long as executive gives sufficient notice and executes a general release of Company and a reimbursement for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination, (ii) in the case of termination by the Company without Cause or by the executive for Good Reason, (a) continuation of base salary through the termination date, plus any reimbursement owed to the executive for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination, (b) continuation of base salary for 24 months after the termination date, (c) on the first and second anniversaries of the termination date, the greater of the executive’s “average annual performance bonus” (as defined in the executive’s Employment Agreement) or his prior year’s bonus (this amount is paid as a lump sum within 90 days of the termination date if the termination is in connection with a Change in Control) and (d) the actual performance bonus, on a pro rata basis, that would have been payable to executive for the fiscal year if executive had not been terminated, (iii) in the case of termination by the Company without Cause or Dr. Medel for Good Reason, in either case within 24 months following a Change in Control: (a) continuation of base salary through the termination date, plus any reimbursement owed to the executive for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination, (b) continuation of base salary for 36 months after the termination date, (c) within 90 days following such termination, an amount equal to three times the greater of the executive’s “average annual performance bonus” (as defined in the executive’s Employment Agreement) or his prior year’s bonus, and (iv) in the case of termination by the Company on account of the executive’s Disability, continuation of base salary for a period of 12 months after the termination date and the actual performance bonus, on a pro rata basis, that would have been payable to executive for the fiscal year if executive had not been terminated, and (v) in the case of termination by the executive due to executive’s Poor Health or Death, the executive’s base salary through the termination date, the actual performance bonus, on a pro rata basis, that would have been payable to executive for the fiscal year if executive had not been terminated and a reimbursement for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination. |
| (2) | Cash severance includes: (i) in the case of a termination by the executive without Good Reason, base salary through the date of termination, the actual performance bonus, on a pro rata basis, that would have been payable to executive for the fiscal year, as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table (except in the case of Ms. Lopez-Blanco or Dr. Stanley), if executive had not been terminated so long as executive gives sufficient notice and executes a general release of Company and a reimbursement for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination, (ii) in the case of termination by the Company without Cause or by the executive for Good Reason or due to Change in Control (except in the case of Ms. Lopez-Blanco or Dr. Stanley), (a) continuation of base salary through the termination date, plus any reimbursement owed to the executive for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination, (b) (except in the case of Ms. Lopez-Blanco or Dr. Stanley) continuation of base salary for 24 months after the termination date, (c) (except in the case of Ms. Lopez-Blanco or Dr. Stanley) on the first and second anniversaries of the termination date, the greater of the executive’s “average annual performance bonus” (as defined in the executive’s Employment Agreement) or his prior year’s bonus (this amount is paid as a lump sum within 90 days of the |
36
Table of Contents
| termination date if the termination is in connection with a Change in Control) and (d) the actual performance bonus, on a pro rata basis, that would have been payable to executive for the fiscal year if executive had not been terminated, (iii)(a) in the case of termination of Ms. Lopez-Blanco or Dr. Stanley by the Company without Cause or by Ms. Lopez-Blanco or Dr. Stanley for Good Reason (other than a Change in Control Good Reason, as defined above): (1) continuation of base salary through the termination date, plus any reimbursement owed to Ms. Lopez-Blanco or Dr. Stanley for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination, (2) continuation of base salary for 12 months after the termination date (six months if terminated for Good Reason other than in connection with a Change in Control), (3) the actual performance bonus, on a pro rata basis, that would have been payable to Ms. Lopez-Blanco or Dr. Stanley for the fiscal year if Ms. Lopez-Blanco or Dr. Stanley had not been terminated (in the case of termination by Ms. Lopez-Blanco or Dr. Stanley for Good Reason, subject to reduction in order to avoid such payments being deemed “excess parachute payments,” as that term is defined in Section 280G of the Code), and (4) in the case of termination of Ms. Lopez-Blanco or Dr. Stanley by the Company without Cause within 30 days of the first anniversary of the termination date, Ms. Lopez-Blanco’s and Dr. Stanley’s “average annual performance bonus” (as defined in her Employment Agreement) and (b) in the case of termination by Ms. Lopez-Blanco for a Change in Control Good Reason, the performance bonus Ms. Lopez-Blanco would have received for the year in which her employment terminates as if she had worked for the entire fiscal year and met all goals and objectives of such year; (iv) in the case of termination by the Company on account of the executive’s Disability, continuation of base salary for a period of 12 months after the termination date (50% of base salary for a period of six months in the case of Ms. Lopez-Blanco or Dr. Stanley) and the actual performance bonus, on a pro rata basis, that would have been payable to executive for the fiscal year if executive had not been terminated, and (v) in the case of termination by the executive due to executive’s Poor Health or Death, the executive’s base salary through the termination date, the actual performance bonus, on a pro rata basis, that would have been payable to executive for the fiscal year if executive had not been terminated and a reimbursement for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination. |
| (3) | This amount reflects the value of each of the executive’s unvested restricted and deferred stock as of December 31, 2012, that would become vested if a specified termination event had occurred on December 31, 2012. In the case of a Change in Control, this accelerated vesting will occur whether or not the executive’s employment is terminated, except in the case of Dr. Medel’s 2008 Deferred Grants, which will vest on the date of termination if he terminates his employment within one year after such Change in Control. |
| (4) | If both a Change in Control occurred and the executive’s employment terminated on December 31, 2012, and the executive received the estimated payments shown in the Change in Control column of this table on that date, those payments would not have resulted in any excess parachute payment under Section 280G of the Code and thus no gross-up payments would have been required with respect to those payments. Whether or not a payment will constitute an “excess parachute payment,” however, depends not only upon the value of the payments that are contingent upon a Change in Control but also upon the average of an executive’s W-2 compensation for the five years immediately prior to the year in which the Change in Control occurs. Thus, facts and circumstances at the time of any Change in Control and termination thereafter, as well as changes in the executive’s compensation history preceding the Change in Control, could materially impact whether and to what extent any excise tax would be imposed and therefore the amount of any gross-up payment. |
| (5) | If the executive is terminated for Cause then the Company will continue to pay the executive his or her base salary through the termination date plus reimbursement for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination. |
| (6) | This amount reflects the value of Dr. Medel’s unvested restricted and deferred stock as of December 31, 2012, that would become vested if a specified termination event had occurred on December 31, 2012. This amount includes the 100,000 shares of Deferred Stock under the Deferred Grants in connection with the execution of Dr. Medel’s Employment Agreement dated August 20, 2008. The Deferred Grants were subject to performance-based vesting requirements that the Compensation Committee certified had been met in November 2009. The Deferred Grants will continue to vest in accordance with their terms if Dr. Medel’s employment is terminated by him for Good Reason. If Dr. Medel incurs a Disability or if his employment is terminated due to Death, then the Deferred Grants will vest immediately. In addition, because the performance vesting threshold has been met, if Dr. Medel’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause, then the Deferred Grants will vest on the date of such termination. The Deferred Grants will also continue to vest in accordance with their terms if Dr. Medel’s employment is terminated due to a Change in Control, provided, that if he terminates his employment within one year after such Change in Control, then the Deferred Grants will vest on such termination. This amount also includes the 87,160 shares of Deferred Stock under the Deferred Grants in connection with the execution of Dr. Medel’s Employment Agreement dated August 7, 2011. These Deferred Grants are subject to performance-based vesting requirements that will cause them to vest in increments of 25 percent if the Company achieves specified levels of annualized income from operations (on a trailing four quarters basis), as determined in accordance with GAAP as follows: $390 million, $430 million, $475 million and $525 million; provided, however that if the Company’s income from operations goals are not achieved as of the year ending December 31, 2018, any unvested deferred stock awards shall terminate and become null and void. These Deferred Grants will continue to vest in accordance with their terms if Dr. Medel’s employment is terminated by him for Good Reason, by the Company without Cause, if Dr. Medel incurs a Disability or is terminated due to Poor Health or death. If Dr. Medel’s employment is terminated due to a Change in Control, then these Deferred Grants will vest immediately. Deferred Stock has been included for each triggering event that causes vesting. |
| (7) | If Dr. Medel’s employment is terminated for any reason, the Company will reimburse Dr. Medel for mutually agreed upon lease space and reasonable wages to an administrative assistant for two years from his date of termination. This amount represents the approximate cost of lease space and reasonable wages to an administrative assistant for two years. |
| (8) | This amount reflects the value of Ms. Lopez-Blanco’s or Dr. Stanley’s unvested restricted stock as of December 31, 2012, that would become vested in the event that Ms. Lopez-Blanco’s or Dr. Stanley’s termination date as a result of a Change in Control occurs within the 12 month period of a Change in Control. |
37
Table of Contents
Each non-employee Director receives the following annual compensation for their service: (i) an annual retainer fee of $60,000, payable quarterly, (ii) an annual fee of $7,500 for attendance at meetings, payable quarterly, (iii) an additional annual retainer fee of $50,000, payable quarterly, for the Chairman of the Board of Directors, (iv) an additional annual retainer fee of $20,000, payable quarterly, for the chair of the Audit Committee, and (v) an additional annual retainer fee of $10,000 per committee, payable quarterly, for the chair of any committee of the Board of Directors other than the Audit Committee. In addition, in June of each year, each non-employee Director is granted restricted stock with a grant date fair value of $97,500, vesting in equal annual installments over a three-year period commencing on the anniversary of the date of grant. However, if at the time of the award a non-employee Director has served on the Board of Directors for a period of less than one year, the number of restricted shares subject to the award shall be prorated to reflect the actual amount of time such Director has served in such position.
The Board of Directors’ policy for awarding restricted stock also applies to each non-employee Director upon his or her initial appointment to the Board of Directors. The grant date fair value of the award will be $200,000 with a three-year vesting period. We provide grants of equity to our Directors because we believe that it helps foster a long-term perspective and aligns our Directors’ interests with that of our shareholders. MEDNAX also reimburses all of its Directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the rendering of services as a Director.
The following table includes all non-employee Directors who served in 2012. Dr. Medel does not earn additional income for his service as a Director. See “Executive Compensation” for information regarding Dr. Medel’s compensation as Chief Executive Officer of MEDNAX.
| Name |
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash (1) |
Stock Awards (2) |
All Other Compensation |
Total Compensation |
||||||||||||
| Cesar L. Alvarez |
$ | 117,500 | $ | 97,516 | $ | — | $ | 215,016 | ||||||||
| Waldemar A. Carlo, M.D. |
$ | 67,500 | $ | 97,516 | $ | — | $ | 165,016 | ||||||||
| Michael B. Fernandez |
$ | 71,099 | $ | 97,516 | $ | — | $ | 168,615 | ||||||||
| Roger K. Freeman, M.D. |
$ | 77,500 | $ | 97,516 | $ | — | $ | 175,016 | ||||||||
| Paul G. Gabos |
$ | 87,500 | $ | 97,516 | $ | — | $ | 185,016 | ||||||||
| Dany Garcia (3) |
$ | 24,293 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 24,293 | ||||||||
| Pascal J. Goldschmidt, M.D. |
$ | 77,500 | $ | 97,516 | $ | — | $ | 175,016 | ||||||||
| Manuel Kadre |
$ | 73,901 | $ | 97,516 | $ | — | $ | 171,417 | ||||||||
| Donna E. Shalala, Ph.D. |
$ | 67,500 | $ | 97,516 | $ | — | $ | 165,016 | ||||||||
| Enrique J. Sosa, Ph.D. |
$ | 67,500 | $ | 97,516 | $ | — | $ | 165,016 | ||||||||
| (1) | This column reports the amount of cash compensation earned in 2012 for Board and committee service. |
| (2) | The amounts in this column reflect the grant-date fair value of the restricted stock awards, calculated in accordance with the accounting guidance for stock-based compensation, but excluding the impact of estimated forfeitures. The following Directors had outstanding stock option awards and restricted stock awards, respectively, at the 2012 fiscal year end: Mr. Alvarez (57,895 and 1,625), Dr. Carlo (41,895 and 1,625), Mr. Fernandez (29,186 and 1,625), Dr. Freeman (19,769 and 1,625), Mr. Gabos (33,895 and 1,625), Dr. Goldschmidt (39,769 and 1,625), Mr. Kadre (39,148 and 1,625), Dr. Shalala (14,317 and 1,625) and Dr. Sosa (33,895 and 1,625). |
| (3) | The amount for Ms. Garcia represents the cash compensation earned through May 10, 2012, the date on which her Board and committee service ended. |
38
Table of Contents
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires MEDNAX’s Directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission reports of ownership and changes in ownership of our common stock. Our Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% shareholders are also required by rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission to furnish MEDNAX with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to MEDNAX, the absence of a Form 3, 4 or 5, or representations from certain reporting persons that no Forms 5 were required, MEDNAX believes that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its Directors, officers and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth information concerning the beneficial ownership of common stock of MEDNAX as of March 12, 2013, for the following:
| • | Each person known to us to be a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock; |
| • | Each of our Directors; |
| • | Our Chief Executive Officer and the other executive officers of MEDNAX who were named in the Summary Compensation Table and serving as executive officers at the end of the last completed fiscal year; and |
| • | All of our Directors and executive officers as a group. |
| Name of Beneficial Owner (1) |
Common Stock Beneficially Owned (2) | |||||||
| Shares | Percent | |||||||
| FMR, LLC (3) |
7,198,654 | 14.4 | % | |||||
| T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (4) |
3,109,200 | 6.2 | % | |||||
| The Vanguard Group (5) |
2,695,586 | 5.4 | % | |||||
| BlackRock, Inc. (6) |
2,611,300 | 5.2 | % | |||||
| Roger J. Medel, M.D. (7) |
815,183 | 1.6 | % | |||||
| Cesar L. Alvarez (8) |
68,140 | * | ||||||
| Waldemar A. Carlo, M.D. (9). |
34,140 | * | ||||||
| Michael B. Fernandez (10) |
40,591 | * | ||||||
| Roger K. Freeman, M.D. (11) |
20,014 | * | ||||||
| Paul G. Gabos (12) |
34,140 | * | ||||||
| Pascal J. Goldschmidt, M.D. (13). |
40,014 | * | ||||||
| Manuel Kadre (14) |
39,393 | * | ||||||
| Donna E. Shalala, Ph.D. (15) |
15,087 | * | ||||||
| Enrique J. Sosa, Ph.D. (16) |
34,140 | * | ||||||
| Joseph M. Calabro (17) |
272,482 | * | ||||||
| Vivian Lopez-Blanco (18) |
49,402 | * | ||||||
| Michael D. Stanley, M.D. (19) |
23,949 | * | ||||||
| Karl B. Wagner (20) |
184,306 | * | ||||||
| All Directors and executive officers as a group (16 persons) (21) |
1,706,982 | 3.4 | % | |||||
| * | Less than one percent |
| (1) | Unless otherwise specified, the address of each of the beneficial owners identified is c/o MEDNAX, Inc., 1301 Concord Terrace, Sunrise, Florida 33323. Each holder is a beneficial owner of common stock of MEDNAX. |
39
Table of Contents
| (2) | Based on 50,168,072 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of March 12, 2013. The number and percentage of shares beneficially owned is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under that rule, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the individual or entity has voting power or investment power and any shares that the individual or entity has the right to acquire within 60 days of March 12, 2013, through the exercise of any stock option or other right. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes or table, each individual or entity has sole voting and investment power, or shares such powers with his or her spouse, with respect to the shares shown as beneficially owned. |
| (3) | Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2013. FMR, LLC’s address is 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109. |
| (4) | Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2013. T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.’s address is 100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202. |
| (5) | Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 7, 2013. The Vanguard Group’s address is 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355. |
| (6) | Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 20, 2012. BlackRock, Inc.’s address is 40 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10022. |
| (7) | Includes (i) 212,323 shares of common stock directly owned; (ii) 480 shares of common stock owned by Dr. Medel’s children, as to which Dr. Medel disclaims beneficial ownership; (iii) 437,500 shares of common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 12, 2013; and (iv) 164,880 shares of unvested restricted stock which Dr. Medel presently has the power to vote. Excludes 100,000 shares of Deferred Stock awarded on August 20, 2008, and vesting on August 20, 2013 and excludes 87,160 shares of Deferred Stock awarded on August 7, 2011, for which vesting is subject to the satisfaction of performance criteria. |
| (8) | Includes (i) 10,000 shares of common stock directly owned and jointly held with Mr. Alvarez’ former spouse; (ii) 56,515 shares of common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 12, 2013, in which options Mr. Alvarez’ former spouse has a 50% economic interest; and (iii) 1,625 shares of unvested restricted stock which Mr. Alvarez presently has the power to vote, in which stock Mr. Alvarez’ former spouse has a 50% economic interest. |
| (9) | Includes (i) 32,515 shares of common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 12, 2013; and (ii) 1,625 shares of unvested restricted stock which Mr. Carlo presently has the power to vote. |
| (10) | Includes (i) 11,160 shares of common stock beneficially owned through a self-directed IRA; (ii) 27,806 shares of common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 12, 2013; and (iii) 1,625 shares of unvested restricted stock which Mr. Fernandez presently has the power to vote. |
| (11) | Includes (i) 18,389 shares of common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 12, 2013; and (ii) 1,625 shares of unvested restricted stock which Mr. Freeman presently has the power to vote. |
| (12) | Includes (i) 32,515 shares of common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 12, 2013; and (ii) 1,625 shares of unvested restricted stock which Mr. Gabos presently has the power to vote. |
| (13) | Includes (i) 38,389 shares of common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 12, 2013; and (ii) 1,625 shares of unvested restricted stock which Dr. Goldschmidt presently has the power to vote. |
| (14) | Includes (i) 37,768 shares of common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 12, 2013; and (ii) 1,625 shares of unvested restricted stock which Mr. Kadre presently has the power to vote. |
| (15) | Includes (i) 525 shares of common stock directly owned; (ii) 12,937 shares of common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 12, 2013; and (iii) 1,625 shares of unvested restricted stock which Dr. Shalala presently has the power to vote. |
| (16) | Includes (i) 32,515 shares of common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 12, 2013; and (ii) 1,625 shares of unvested restricted stock which Dr. Sosa presently has the power to vote. |
| (17) | Includes (i) 28,953 shares of common stock directly owned; (ii) four shares of common stock directly owned by his wife which were acquired through the Company’s employee stock purchase plans and as to which Mr. Calabro disclaims beneficial ownership; (iii) 143,750 shares of common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 12, 2013; and (iv) 99,775 shares of unvested restricted stock which Mr. Calabro presently has the power to vote. |
| (18) | Includes (i) 7,008 shares of common stock directly owned; (ii) 1,813 shares of common stock directly owned that were acquired through the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan; (iii) 20,000 shares of common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 12, 2013; and (iv) 20,581 shares of unvested restricted stock which Ms. Lopez-Blanco presently has the power to vote. |
| (19) | Includes (i) 5,000 shares of common stock directly owned; and (ii) 18,949 shares of unvested restricted stock which Dr. Stanley presently has the power to vote. |
| (20) | Includes (i) 9,223 shares of common stock directly owned; (ii) 21,016 shares of common stock beneficially owned by RMMR Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership controlled by Mr. Wagner; (iii) 696 shares accumulated through the Company’s 401(k) thrift and profit sharing plans; (iv) 101,562 shares of common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 12, 2013; and (v) 51,809 shares of unvested restricted stock which Mr. Wagner presently has the power to vote. |
| (21) | Includes (i) 992,161 shares of common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 12, 2013; and (ii) 405,949 shares of unvested restricted stock which certain executive officers presently have the power to vote. |
40
Table of Contents
MEDNAX’s independent auditors for the year ended December 31, 2012, was the firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Subject to shareholder ratification, the Audit Committee has reappointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered certified public accounting firm to perform audit services for MEDNAX in 2013. MEDNAX expects that representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will attend the annual meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Fees Paid to Independent Auditors
The aggregate fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the indicated services rendered during fiscal years 2012 and 2011 were as follows:
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has billed MEDNAX $1,003,350, in the aggregate, for professional services for the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2012, reviews of MEDNAX’s interim consolidated financial statements, which are included in each of MEDNAX’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the year ended December 31, 2012, the statutory audit of MEDNAX’s wholly owned captive insurance subsidiary and the review of certain SEC filings. During 2011, audit fees totaled $965,000, in the aggregate, for professional services for the audit of MEDNAX’s consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2011, reviews of MEDNAX’s interim consolidated financial statements, which are included in each of MEDNAX’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the year ended December 31, 2011, statutory audits of MEDNAX’s wholly owned captive insurance subsidiary and the review of certain SEC filings.
During 2012 and 2011, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP billed MEDNAX $42,500 and 40,000, respectively, for the audit of MEDNAX’s benefit plans.
During 2012 and 2011 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP did not bill MEDNAX for any tax consultation services.
There were no other fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for 2012 or 2011.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The Audit Committee is required to review and approve the proposed retention of independent auditors to perform any proposed auditing and non-auditing services as outlined in its charter. The Audit Committee has not established policies and procedures separate from its charter concerning the pre-approval of auditing and non-auditing related services. As required by Section 10A of the Exchange Act, our Audit Committee has authorized all auditing and non-auditing services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during 2012 and the fees paid for such services.
41
Table of Contents
PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Audit Committee has selected and appointed the firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to act as our independent registered certified public accounting firm for the 2013 fiscal year. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was our independent auditor for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. Although ratification is not required by our bylaws or otherwise, the Board of Directors is submitting the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to our shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the appointment is not ratified, the Audit Committee will re-evaluate its appointment, taking into consideration our shareholders’ vote. However, the Audit Committee is solely responsible for the appointment and termination of our auditors and may do so at any time in its discretion.
Proxies will be voted “FOR” ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered certified public accounting firm for the 2013 fiscal year absent contrary instructions.
MEDNAX’s Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered certified public accounting firm for the 2013 fiscal year.
42
Table of Contents
PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, MEDNAX is providing its shareholders the opportunity to cast a non-binding advisory vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” the compensation paid to named executive officers in 2012 as disclosed and described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Executive Compensation”, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the narrative disclosures that accompany the compensation tables.
As described in detail in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related narrative discussion, the compensation of executive officers is designed to have strong links to performance achievements, both in terms of operational and financial results as well as in optimizing shareholder value. We evaluate the relationship between compensation cost, shareholder value and company performance on a regular basis. At-risk elements such as performance-based cash incentives and stock-based compensation comprise a significant portion of our overall executive remuneration. For incentive plans, we establish performance goals so that the level of compensation received appropriately corresponds to the level of performance achieved. In addition, the vesting of stock-based compensation is designed to encourage ownership that results in business decisions that build long-term shareholder value and thus stock price appreciation, and retention of our named executive officers. We believe that the compensation paid to our named executive officers for 2012 appropriately considers our demonstrated ability to increase revenue, net income and profitability over the short- and long-term as a result of the continued leadership of these named executive officers.
Shareholders are urged to read the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Executive Compensation”, which discusses our executive compensation programs in detail, as well as the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” appearing in our 2012 Annual Report that accompanies this Proxy Statement.
Accordingly, MEDNAX requests your approval of the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and related narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.
MEDNAX’s Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the approval of the compensation paid to its named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the related narrative discussion.
Although the vote is non-binding and advisory, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee will review the voting results in connection with their ongoing evaluation of the Company’s compensation program.
43
Table of Contents
The Board of Directors knows of no other business to be brought before the annual meeting. If, however, any other business should properly come before the annual meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy card to vote the shares they represent in accordance with the recommendation of MEDNAX’s Board of Directors.
AVAILABILITY OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
Copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (without exhibits or documents incorporated by reference therein) are available without charge to shareholders upon written request to our Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Communications, at 1301 Concord Terrace, Sunrise, Florida 33323, by calling (954) 384-0175 or via the Internet at www.mednax.com.
INFORMATION CONCERNING SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
As more specifically provided in our Articles of Incorporation, no business may be brought before an annual meeting unless it is specified in the notice of the meeting or is otherwise properly brought before the meeting by or at the direction of our Board of Directors or by a shareholder entitled to vote who has delivered proper notice to us, together with the information required by our Articles of Incorporation, not less than 120 days nor more than 180 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s notice of annual meeting. Accordingly, any shareholder proposal to be considered at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be properly submitted to us on or before November 22, 2013, but not earlier than September 23, 2013, or such proposal will be considered untimely. A copy of the provision of MEDNAX’s Articles of Incorporation relating to shareholder nominations is available upon request from MEDNAX’s Secretary at 1301 Concord Terrace, Sunrise, Florida 33323. These requirements are separate from the Securities and Exchange Commission’s requirements that a shareholder must meet in order to have a shareholder proposal included in our Proxy Statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Shareholders interested in submitting a proposal for inclusion in our proxy materials for the 2014 Annual Shareholders Meeting may do so by following the procedures set forth in Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act and MEDNAX’s Articles of Incorporation. To be eligible for inclusion in such proxy materials, shareholder proposals must be received by our Secretary, at the address noted above, not later than November 22, 2013. No shareholder proposal was properly received for inclusion in this Proxy Statement.
44
Table of Contents
1301 Concord Terrace
Sunrise, Florida 33323-2825
Table of Contents
|
MEDNAX, INC. 1301 CONCORD TERRACE SUNRISE, FL 33323-2825 |
VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. EDT on May 8, 2013. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. | |
|
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS | ||
| If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. | ||
|
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 | ||
| Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. EDT on May 8, 2013. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. | ||
|
VOTE BY MAIL | ||
| Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. | ||
| TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: | ||
| M55187-P33427-Z59561 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS | ||
| DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY | ||
| THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. | ||
| MEDNAX, INC.
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: |
For All |
Withhold All |
For All Except |
To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1. | Election of Directors | ¨ | ¨ | ¨ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nominees: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
01) Cesar L. Alvarez |
06) P.J. Goldschmidt, M.D. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 02) Waldemar A. Carlo, M.D. | 07) Manuel Kadre | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 03) Michael B. Fernandez | 08) Roger J. Medel, M.D. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 04) Roger K. Freeman, M.D. | 09) Donna E. Shalala Ph.D. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 05) Paul G. Gabos | 10) Enrique J. Sosa Ph.D. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals: | For | Against | Abstain | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. | Proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered certified public accounting firm for the 2013 fiscal year. | ¨ | ¨ | ¨ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. | Proposal to approve, by non-binding advisory vote, the compensation of our named executive officers. | ¨ | ¨ | ¨ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated. |
¨
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting. |
¨ | ¨ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Yes | No | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] | Date | Signature (Joint Owners) | Date | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table of Contents
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.
M55188-P33427-Z59561
| MEDNAX, INC. Annual Meeting of Shareholders May 9, 2013 10:00 AM EDT This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors
The shareholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Roger J. Medel, M.D., Dominic J. Andreano and Vivian Lopez-Blanco, or any of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his or her substitute, and hereby authorize(s) them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the shares of Common Stock of MEDNAX, Inc. that the shareholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at 10:00 a.m., EDT, on Thursday, May 9, 2013, at the Renaissance Plantation, 1230 South Pine Island Road, Plantation, FL 33324, and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations.
|
||||||||
| Address Changes/Comments: |
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||||
| (If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.) | ||||||||
|
Continued and to be signed on reverse side
|
||||||||