CHINA NORTH EAST PETROLEUM HOLDINGS LIMITED
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 8 REGISTRATION PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS
In conjunction with the March 5, 2009 modification of the Company’s secured debenture issued on February 28, 2008 (see Note 5, Secured Debenture, above) and the original issuance of the secured debenture, the Company entered into two Registration Rights Agreements which cover stock to be issued underlying warrants associated with both the modification and the issuance of the secured debenture. These Registration Rights Agreements provide for financial penalties in certain circumstances, including (i) if the registration statement covering the shares of common stock underlying the Original Warrants is not declared effective within 180 days of the date of the Registration Rights Agreement or (ii) after effectiveness, the registration statement ceases to remain continuously effective for more than 10 consecutive calendar days or more than 30 calendar days in any 30 calendar day period. The financial penalty equals to 1% of the aggregate purchase price paid for the Original Warrants subject to the registration rights up to a maximum of 10% of the principal amount of the debenture.
The Company analyzes these registration rights agreements to determine if penalties triggered for late filing should be accrued under ASC 825-20 (formerly FSP EITF 00-19-2, “Accounting for Registration Payment Arrangements”). The Company evaluates the potential likelihood of incurring these financial penalties, and the magnitude of the associated costs, on a probabilistic basis, as required under ASC 825-20. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company estimated that no financial penalties are likely to be incurred as a result of any of its registration obligations, and therefore no expense was accrued for anticipated future registration payments.
NOTE 9 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
During 2010, the Company granted to its employees 60,000 stock options qualified under the Company’s 2006 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan (the “2006 Plan”) to purchase Common Stock. As of September 30, 2010, stock options granted under the 2006 Plan to purchase 530,000 shares of its Common Stock (the “Options”) at an exercise price from $2.94 to $5.50 per share were outstanding. 25% of the 220,000 stock options shall vest upon grant and 25% shall vest every three months thereafter, and these stock options granted shall expire ten years after the grant date if unexercised at that time. 50% of the 310,000 stock options shall vest upon grant and 50% shall vest on the first anniversary of the grant date.
The 2006 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 2,500,000 common stock equivalents (stock options, restricted stock, stock grants). As of September 30, 2010, the Company had 240,000 remaining share equivalents available for grant under the 2006 Plan. The Company settles employee stock option exercises with newly issued common shares.
The fair value of stock options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
Expected
|
Expected
|
Dividend
|
Risk Free
|
Grant Date
|
Life
|
Volatility
|
Yield
|
Interest Rate
|
Fair Value
|
5 years
|
268% - 316%
|
0%
|
2.10% - 3.42%
|
$2.94 - $5.50
|
-
|
Dividend Yield: The expected dividend yield is zero. The Company has not paid a dividend and does not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future.
|
|
|
-
|
Risk Free Rate: Risk-free interest rate of 2.10% - 3.42% was used. The risk-free interest rate was based on U.S. Treasury yields with a remaining term that corresponded to the expected term of the option calculated on the grant date.
|
|
|
-
|
Expected Life: Because the Company has no historical share option exercise experience to estimate future exercise patterns, the expected life was determined using the simplified method as these awards meet the definition of "plain-vanilla.”.
|
CHINA NORTH EAST PETROLEUM HOLDINGS LIMITED
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 9 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (continued)
Stock compensation expense is recognized based on awards expected to vest. There was no estimated forfeiture as the Company has a short history of issuing options. ASC 718-10 (formerly FAS No. 123R) requires forfeiture to be estimated at the time of grant and revised in subsequent periods, if necessary, if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
On January 28, 2010, 250,000 shares of stock options previously granted to one senior management member were exercised at $4.50 per share, with an aggregate fair value of $1,125,000 paid to the Company.
On January 27, 2010, 400,000 shares of common stocks of the Company with a fair value of approximately $3,232,000 were granted to the key management team of Tiancheng, of which the Company recognized $336,667 and $1,346,607 as staff compensation expenses included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.
As of September 30, 2010, the total compensation cost related to stock options not yet recognized was $2,022,983 and will be recognized over the next three years.
The following is a summary of the stock options activity:
|
|
Number of
Options
Outstanding
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
4.18
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(250,000
|
)
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2010
|
|
|
160,000
|
|
|
$
|
4.18
|
|
The following is a summary of the status of options outstanding at September 30, 2010:
Exercise Price
|
|
Outstanding
Options
Number
|
|
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
|
|
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Exercisable
Options
Number
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
$4.05
|
|
40,000
|
|
7.67 years
|
|
$4.05
|
|
40,000
|
|
$4.05
|
$2.94
|
|
60,000
|
|
8.67 years
|
|
$2.94
|
|
60,000
|
|
$2.94
|
$5.50
|
|
60,000
|
|
9.67 years
|
|
$5.50
|
|
30,000
|
|
$5.50
|
CHINA NORTH EAST PETROLEUM HOLDINGS LIMITED
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 10 STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
The Company’s outstanding warrants as of September 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
Date of issue
|
|
Exercise
price
|
|
|
Outstanding
Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant 1
|
February 28, 2008
|
|
$ |
2.35 |
|
|
|
2,100,000 |
|
Warrant 2
|
March 5, 2009
|
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
Warrant 3
|
March 5, 2009
|
|
$ |
2.35 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
Warrant 4
|
April 29, 2009
|
|
$ |
2.65 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
Warrant 5
|
September 15, 2009
|
|
$ |
6.00 |
|
|
|
748,396 |
|
Warrant 6
|
September 10, 2009
|
|
$ |
6.00 |
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
Warrant 7
|
December 11, 2009
|
|
$ |
8.10 |
|
|
|
58,910 |
|
Warrant 8
|
December 17, 2009
|
|
$ |
8.10 |
|
|
|
392,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,010,034 |
|
The Company treats these warrants as liabilities under ASC 815-40 and accordingly records the warrants at fair value with changes in fair values recorded in the profit or loss until such time as the warrants are exercised or expired. The fair values were $39,528,261 at December 31, 2009 and $14,007,665 at September 30, 2010. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded a gain of $81,430, a gain of $2,272,159, a gain of $25,520,596 and a loss of 9,805,886, respectively, in changes in the fair value of the warrants in profit or loss.
The Company estimates the fair value of these warrants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions:
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
Market price and estimated fair value of common stock:
|
|
$ |
6.08 |
|
Exercise price:
|
|
$ |
2.00 - $8.10 |
|
Remaining contractual life (years):
|
|
|
0.46 - 4.25 |
|
Dividend yield:
|
|
|
– |
|
Expected volatility:
|
|
|
36% - 229 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate:
|
|
|
0.19% - 2.10 |
% |
Stock issuance
(1)
|
In January 2010, Series B Warrants issued with the secured debenture (Note 5) were exercised by one investor to purchase 867,438 shares of common stock at the exercise price of $2.35 per share.
|
|
|
(2)
|
On March 23, 2010, an investor exercised warrants and purchased 21,739 shares of common stock at exercise price of $6.00 per share. The Company received $130,434 proceeds in connection with this transaction.
|
|
|
(3)
|
In April 2010, one investor exercised warrants to purchase 29,865 shares of common stock at the exercise price of $6.00 per share.
|
CHINA NORTH EAST PETROLEUM HOLDINGS LIMITED
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 11 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
(1)
|
As of September 30, 2010, the Company owed a stockholder $2,703,736 which is unsecured and repayable on demand. Imputed interest is computed at 5% per annum on the amount due.
|
|
|
(2)
|
As of September 30, 2010, the Company owed a related party $14,930 which is unsecured and repayable on demand. Imputed interest is computed at 5% per annum on the amount due.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Total imputed interest expenses recorded as additional paid-in capital amounted to $0, $70,210, $0 and $120,127 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
|
|
|
(4)
|
The Company paid a stockholder $3,512, $10,536, $877 and $4,384 for leased office spaces for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
|
|
|
(5)
|
As of September 30, 2010, the Company owed a related company $28,367 which is unsecured and repayable on demand. Imputed interest is computed at 5% per annum on the amount due.
|
NOTE 12 OIL PROPERTIES
As of September 30, 2010, the Company’s full cost pool did not exceed the ceiling limitation, based on average oil prices in the prior 12-month period. Therefore, the Company did not record any additional impairment expense related to our oil properties for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded an impairment expense related to our oil properties of $1,456 and $13,833,812 respectively.
NOTE 13 SEGMENTS
The Company follows FASB ASC 280 – Segment Reporting, which requires that companies disclose segment data based on how management makes decision about allocating resources to segments and evaluating their performance. The Company operates in two reportable segments; exploration and production of crude oil (“Crude oil”) and contract land drilling of oil wells (“Contract drilling”). The accounting policies of the segments are the same as described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company evaluates segment performance based on income from operations. All inter-company transactions between segments have been eliminated. As a result, the components of operating income for one segment may not be comparable to another segment. The following is a summary of the Company’s segment information for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (in thousand):
CHINA NORTH EAST PETROLEUM HOLDINGS LIMITED
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 13 SEGMENTS (continued)
|
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil
|
|
$
|
9,853
|
|
|
$
|
14,404
|
|
|
$
|
41,890
|
|
|
$
|
34,655
|
|
Contract drilling
|
|
|
10,133
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
34,731
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
19,986
|
|
|
$
|
14,404
|
|
|
$
|
76,621
|
|
|
$
|
34,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil
|
|
$
|
6,123
|
|
|
$
|
9,273
|
|
|
$
|
27,307
|
|
|
$
|
21,918
|
|
Contract drilling
|
|
|
6,592
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20,874
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
$
|
12,715
|
|
|
$
|
9,273
|
|
|
$
|
48,181
|
|
|
$
|
21,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil
|
|
$
|
5,064
|
|
|
$
|
8,152
|
|
|
$
|
23,742
|
|
|
$
|
5,185
|
|
Contract drilling
|
|
|
5,375
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19,407
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
10,435
|
|
|
|
8,152
|
|
|
|
43,149
|
|
|
|
5,185
|
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
25,507
|
|
|
|
(19,750
|
)
|
Net income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
10,546
|
|
|
$
|
10,128
|
|
|
$
|
68,656
|
|
|
$
|
(14,565
|
)
|
NOTE 14 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company was recently involved in six purported legal actions, three of which are securities class actions and three of which are shareholder derivative actions, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company and certain officers and directors. The three class actions assert claims under the federal securities laws and the three derivative actions assert common law claims based on breach of duty.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historic or current facts. They use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to:
|
●
|
Deviations in and volatility of the market price of crude oil produced by us;
|
|
●
|
Uncertainties in the estimation of proved reserves and in the projection of future rates of production;
|
|
●
|
Timing and amount of production;
|
|
●
|
The availability of, and our ability to raise additional capital resources and provide liquidity to meet cash flow needs;
|
|
●
|
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates;
|
|
●
|
Our ability to find, acquire, lease, develop, and produce from new properties; and
|
|
●
|
The other risks and uncertainties which are described below under “RISK FACTORS.”
|
OVERVIEW OF OUR BUSINESS
Overview
We are engaged in the exploration and production of crude oil in Northern China. We have an arrangement with PetroChina to sell our crude oil production for use in the China marketplace. We currently operate 292 producing wells located in four oilfields in Northern China and have plans for additional drilling projects.
In particular, through two of our subsidiaries, Song Yuan City Yu Qiao Oil and Gas Development Co. Ltd. (“Yu Qiao”) and Chang Ling Longde Oil and Gas Development Co. Ltd. (“LongDe”), we have entered into binding sales agreements with the PetroChina Group, whereby we sell our crude oil production for use in the China marketplace.
We currently operate 4 oilfields located in Northern China, which include:
Details of Oil and Gas Properties and Activities
Field
|
|
Acreage
|
|
Producing wells #
|
|
Proven Reserves (bbls)
|
Qian112
|
|
5,115
|
|
247
|
|
5,971,685
|
Da34
|
|
2,298
|
|
12
|
|
59,610
|
Gu31
|
|
1,779
|
|
12
|
|
73,800
|
He301
|
|
2,471
|
|
21
|
|
26,929
|
Total
|
|
11,663
|
|
292
|
|
6,132,024
|
Additionally, through our subsidiary, Song Yuan Tiancheng Drilling Engineering Co. Ltd., we provide contract drilling and other oilfield services for state-owned and non-state-owned oil companies in Northern China.
The flowing chart illustrates our company’s organizational structure:
Organizational History
We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on August 20, 1999 under the name Draco Holding Corporation. On March 29, 2004, we executed an Agreement for Share Exchange with Hong Xiang Petroleum Group Limited, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the British Virgin Islands (“Hong Xiang”), and the individual shareholders owning 100% of the outstanding common shares of Hong Xiang (the “Hong Xiang Shareholders”).
Pursuant to the Agreement for Share Exchange, we issued 18,700,000 shares of our common stock to the Hong Xiang Shareholders in exchange for all of the shares of capital stock of Hong Xiang owned by the Hong Xiang Shareholders at closing, and Hong Xiang became our wholly-owned subsidiary. On June 28, 2004, we changed our name to China North East Petroleum Holdings Ltd.
During 2004, we acquired a 100% ownership in Song Yuan City Hong Xiang Petroleum Technical Services Co., Ltd. (“Hong Xiang Technical”), and Hong Xiang Technical in turn acquired a 100% interest in Song Yuan City Yu Qiao Qianan Hong Xiang Oil and Gas Development Co., Ltd. (“Hong Xiang Oil Development”), which was engaged in the exploration and production of crude oil in the Jilin region of the PRC.
As a result of the Yu Qiao acquisition discussed below, all operations, assets and liabilities of the Company’s subsidiary Hong Xiang Oil Development were transferred to Yu Qiao on March 19, 2007. Since Hong Xiang Oil Development and Hong Xiang Technical were no longer necessary elements of the Company’s corporate structure, and they were liquidated and dissolved.
PetroChina Oil Leases
Pursuant to a 20-year exclusive Cooperative Oil Lease (the “Oil Lease”), entered into among PetroChina Group, Yu Qiao and the Company in May 2002, the Company has the right to explore, develop and produce oil at Qian’an 112 Oilfield. Pursuant to the Oil Lease, (i) PetroChina is entitled to 20% of the Company’s oil revenue for the first ten years of the Oil Lease term and 40% of the Company’s oil production for the remaining ten years of the Oil Lease term; and (ii) Yu Qiao is entitled to 2% of the Company’s oil production as a management fee. The payment of management fee was stopped following the acquisition of Yu Qiao by the Company in 2007.
In May 2003, LongDe entered into a 20-year contract with PetroChina Group. Pursuant to the contract, LongDe has the right to explore, develop and produce oil at the Hetingbao 301 oilfield in the PRC. In addition, pursuant to the contract between PetroChina and LongDe, PetroChina is entitled to 20% of LongDe’s output in the first ten years and 40% of LongDe’s output thereafter until the end of the contract.
As the controlling shareholder of Yu Qiao, the Company has the rights to extract and develop Qian’an 112 and other oil fields under the contracts that Yu Qiao has entered into with PetroChina. These oilfields include the Daan 34 oilfield and Gudian 31 oilfield in Jilin Province.
Song Yuan Technical Joint Venture
On July 26, 2006, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with Wang Hong Jun (“Mr. Wang”), the president and a stockholder of the Company and Ju Guizhi (“Ms. Ju”), mother of Mr. Wang, to contribute to the increased registered capital of Song Yuan North East Petroleum Technical Service Co. Ltd. (“Song Yuan Technical”). The purpose of Song Yuan Technical is to acquire oil and gas properties and to engage in the exploration of crude oil in the PRC. On December 20, 2006, Mr. Wang transferred his interest (4.5%) in Song Yuan Technical to Ms. Ju and as a result, the Company owns a 90% equity interest in Song Yuan Technical, and Ms. Ju owns the remaining 10% equity interest in Song Yuan Technical.
Acquisition of LongDe
In order to comply with certain PRC laws relating to foreign entities’ ownership of oil and gas companies in the PRC, prior to March 17, 2008, Song Yuan Technical directly owned a 70% equity interest in LongDe, while Sun Peng and Ai Chang Shan, respectively, owned 10% and 20% of the equity interests in Long De in trust for Song Yuan Technical. On March 17, 2008, Song Yuan Technical acquired an additional 20% equity interest in LongDe, 10% from Sun Peng, and 10% from Ai Chang Shan. Accordingly, Song Yuan Technical now owns directly 90% of the equity interests in LongDe, with Ai Chang Shan holding the remaining 10% in trust for Song Yuan Technical. The acquisition of LongDe was made pursuant to the laws of the PRC. As a 90% owner of Song Yuan Technical, the Company effectively controls LongDe.
This beneficial ownership structure is governed by two trust agreements: (i) Trust Agreement dated October 8, 2006 by and between Song Yuan Technical and Ai Chang Shan, and (ii) Trust Agreement dated April 18, 2008 by and between Song Yuan Technical and Wang Hongjun. Pursuant to the first trust agreement, Ai Chang Shan holds 20% of the equity interest in Long De in trust for the benefit of Song Yuan Technical. On March 17, 2008, Ai Chang Shan entered into a transfer agreement whereby Ai Chang Shan transferred 10% of the equity interest of Long De held in trust pursuant to the trust agreement to Song Yuan Technical to be held directly by Song Yuan Technical. Currently under the trust agreement dated October 8, 2006, Ai Chang Shan holds 10% of the total equity interest of Long De in trust for the benefit of Song Yuan Technical. Pursuant to the second trust agreement, Wang Hongjun holds 10% of the total outstanding equity interest in LongDe in trust for the benefit of Song Yuan Technical.
Acquisition of Yu Qiao
The Company acquired a beneficial interest in 100% of the equity interest in Yu Qiao from Yu Qiao’s shareholders, Ms. Ju (70%), Meng Xiangyun (20%) and Wang Bingwu (10%) on January 26, 2007. In order to comply with PRC laws, which restrict ownership of oil and gas companies by foreign entities, following the acquisition, Meng Xiangyun and Wang Pingwu held 20% and 10% of the equity interest, respectively, in Yu Qiao in trust for the benefit of Song Yuan Technical.
On March 17, 2008, the trust agreement with Meng Xiangyun was cancelled and the 20% equity interest in Yu Qiao held in trust by Meng Xiangyun was transferred to Song Yuan Technical. As a result of the termination of the trust agreement and the transfer, Song Yuan Technical became the direct owner of the 20% equity interest in Yu Qiao held in trust by Meng Xiangyun.
On April 18, 2008, the 10% equity interest in Yu Qiao held by Wang Pingwu in trust was transferred to the Company’s President and Chairman, Wang Hongjun to hold in trust for the benefit of Song Yuan Technical.
Currently 90% of Yu Qiao is directly held by Song Yuan Technical and 10% of Yu Qiao is held in trust by Wang Hongjun for the benefit of Song Yuan Technical.
Acquisition of Tiancheng
On September 27, 2009, we acquired through Song Yuan Technical all of the beneficial ownership of all of the equity interest in Song Yuan Tiancheng Drilling Engineering Co., Ltd. or “Tiancheng.” In order to comply with certain PRC laws, 5% of the equity interest in Tiancheng is held in trust by one of the Tiancheng selling stockholders for the benefit of Song Yuan Technical, while the other 95% of the equity interest in Tiancheng is held directly by Song Yuan Technical. Tiancheng provides oil drilling services. Tiancheng currently has eight drilling teams with the same number of rigs in house, which include two 4,000 meters rig (~13,000 feet depth), three 3,000 meters rigs (~9,800 feet depth) and three 2,000 meters rigs (~6,500 feet depth) respectively. Tiancheng has drilling contracts with PetroChina and other private oil companies to provide drilling and oilfield services.
Listing on the NYSE Amex LLC.
On June 15, 2009, the Company’s common stock commenced trading on the NYSE Amex LLC (“AMEX”). Upon trading on AMEX, the Company changed its ticker symbol from “CNEH.OB” to “NEP.”
Oil Properties and Activities
As of September 30, 2010, the Company had a total of 292 producing wells, including 247 producing wells at the Qian’an 112 oilfield, 21 producing wells at the Hetingbao 301 oilfield, 12 producing wells at the Daan 34 oilfield and 12 producing wells at the Gudian 31 oilfield.
All of the Company’s crude oil production is sold to the PetroChina Group. The approximate distance of each of the Company’s oil fields from the Jilin Refinery is as follows: the Qian’an 112 oilfield is four kilometers away; the Hetingbao 301 oilfield is three kilometers away; the Daan 34 oilfield is fifteen kilometers away and the Gudian Oilfield 31 is thirty kilometers away.
PetroChina pays the Company a price per barrel equal to the monthly mean price calculated from the Mean of Platts Singapore (“MOPS”) daily price for sour, heavy Indonesian crude, as measured during the previous month. Platts is a leading global provider of energy and metals information that collects and publishes pricing data on a wide range of petroleum and non-petroleum commodity types. An independent provider, Platts serves the oil, natural gas, electricity, emissions, nuclear power, coal, petrochemical, shipping, and metals markets from 17 offices worldwide. Price paid to the Company is FOB at the local Jilin Province PetroChina oil storage depot. As the oil produced in China is heavy and sour, compared with light and sweet oil quoted as West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) and Brent, therefore, the oil price we receive from PetroChina generally is slightly discounted to the WTI or Brent price.
And the following table shows the difference between WTI and MOPS China in monthly oil price.
|
|
|
|
January 2010
|
78
|
73
|
February 2010
|
76
|
76
|
March 2010
|
81
|
71
|
April 2010
|
84
|
75
|
May 2010
|
74
|
80
|
June 2010
|
75
|
76
|
July 2010
|
76
|
72
|
August 2010
|
77
|
72
|
September 2010
|
75
|
73
|
(Note: data references to Wall Street Journal, and MOPS China price is exchanged from RMB to USD at the exchange rate of 6.8164 for 9 months moving average)
As noted in the table above, compared with WTI prices, the MOPS China price generally has a slight discount due to the lower oil quality and there is also one-month time lag between the prices.
PetroChina pays the Company for crude oil sold monthly in arrears, on approximately the 15th day after the end of each month. The amount paid to the Company in the first two months of each calendar quarter is decreased by the amount of oil surcharge tax the Company will owe to the PRC government at the end of that calendar quarter. PetroChina holds those amounts back from the Company until the end of each calendar quarter, and then pays those amounts to the Company with the balance due for crude oil deliveries in the final month of the quarter. For this reason, the Accounts Receivable balance at the end of each quarter is larger than the prior month’s oil sales revenue, because it includes the oil surcharge tax amounts the Company owes for the first two months of the quarter.
Operating Performance
Our operating performance is influenced by several factors, the most significant of which are the price we receive for our crude oil and the quantities of crude oil that we are able to produce. Global crude oil prices are the most important factor affecting the price that we receive for our crude oil production. The prices received for different grades of crude oil are based upon the world price of crude oil, which is then adjusted based upon the particular grade. Typically, light crude oil is sold at a premium, while heavy grades of crude (such as the type we produce from the four fields we operate) are discounted.
Our crude oil development and acquisition activities require substantial and continuing capital expenditures. Historically, the sources of financing to fund our capital expenditures have included:
|
●
|
Cash flow from operations;
|
|
●
|
Sales of equity securities;
|
|
●
|
Loans from shareholders and third parties; and
|
|
●
|
Extension of credit from our suppliers, including particularly our suppliers of well drilling and completion services.
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 (the “Current Quarter”), the sale price we received for our crude oil production averaged $72.3 per barrel, compared with $64.33 per barrel for the three months ended September 30, 2009 (the “Comparable Quarter”). For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the sale price we received for our crude oil production averaged $74.33 per barrel, compared with $51.33 per barrel for the same period ended a year ago.
Our oil producing activities are accounted for using the full cost method of accounting. Under this accounting method, we capitalize all costs incurred in connection with the acquisition of oil properties and the exploration for and development of oil reserves. These costs include lease acquisition costs, geological and geophysical expenditures, costs of drilling productive and non-productive wells (to date, all of the wells we have drilled have been productive wells), conversion of productive wells into production support infrastructure such as water-injection wells, and overhead expenses directly related to land and property acquisition and exploration and development activities. Proceeds from the disposition of oil properties are accounted for as a reduction in capitalized costs, with no gain or loss recognized unless a disposition involves a material change in the relationship between capitalized costs and reserves, in which case the gain or loss is recognized.
Depreciation of the capitalized costs of oil properties, including estimated future development costs, is based upon estimates of proved oil reserves and production. Unproved oil properties are not amortized, but are individually assessed for impairment. The cost of any impaired property is transferred to the balance of oil properties being depleted. Reserve values are calculated annually, at our fiscal year-end, by a third-party geological consulting company, and are estimated in accordance with ASC Topic 932, “Extractive Activities - Oil and Gas”, (formerly FAS 19 – Financial Accounting and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing Companies (as amended)), SEC Regulation S-K and Regulation S-X under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the SEC’s Industry Guide 2.
Production, Average Sales Prices, Production Costs, Drilling Depth and Drilling Wells Count
Our business operations are characterized by frequent, and sometimes significant, changes in the price we receive for the crude oil we produce and in the volumes of crude oil we produce. The following table shows selected operating data for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Oil Output (Bbl)
|
|
|
135,473
|
|
|
|
224,219
|
|
|
|
561,875
|
|
|
|
671,351
|
|
Avg. Sale Price ($/bbl)
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
Tiancheng Drilling Depth (m)
|
|
|
70,493
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
243,730
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Tiancheng Drilling Wells
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil Sales Revenue
|
|
$
|
9,853,426
|
|
|
$
|
14,403,921
|
|
|
$
|
41,890,415
|
|
|
$
|
34,654,549
|
|
Drilling Revenue
|
|
$
|
10,132,841
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
34,731,330
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production Costs
|
|
|
932,168
|
|
|
|
1,103,163
|
|
|
|
3,024,158
|
|
|
|
2,769,762
|
|
Drilling Cost
|
|
|
3,059,478
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12,420,196
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization of oil properties and drilling equipment
|
|
|
1,775,463
|
|
|
|
2,369,888
|
|
|
|
6,473,559
|
|
|
|
7,684,931
|
|
Amortization of land use rights
|
|
|
7,937
|
|
|
|
2,982
|
|
|
|
23,684
|
|
|
|
8,943
|
|
Oil Surcharge
|
|
|
1,495,917
|
|
|
|
1,655,000
|
|
|
|
6,498,555
|
|
|
|
2,273,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
$
|
12,715,304
|
|
|
$
|
9,272,888
|
|
|
$
|
48,181,593
|
|
|
$
|
21,917,746
|
|
As shown in the above table, the appreciation of oil prices in 2010 compared with 2009 caused our revenues to increase substantially, even thought the production of oil decreased sightly due to the raining season and flood in the second quarter.
The following table reflects the significant oil sale price fluctuation in China in the past 12 months.
Month
|
Oil Sale Price
|
RMB/Ton
|
USD/Bbl
|
January 2010
|
3,670
|
73
|
February 2010
|
3,820
|
76
|
March 2010
|
3,586
|
71
|
April 2010
|
3,761
|
75
|
May 2010
|
4,054
|
80
|
June 2010
|
3,837
|
76
|
July 2010
|
3,615
|
72
|
August 2010
|
3,599
|
72
|
September 2010
|
3,660
|
73
|
(Note: 1 Ton = 7.38 Bbls, Exchange rate 1 USD = 6.8164 RMB for 9 months moving average)
Contract Drilling Services
China North East Petroleum’s newest subsidiary, Song Yuan Tiancheng Drilling Engineering Co. Ltd (“Tiancheng”), founded in December 2007, provides contract drilling and other oilfield services for state-owned and non-state-owned oil companies in Northern China.
Tiancheng is one of the four private contract drilling and service companies that has been qualificated and licensed to operate in PetroChina’s Jilin oilfield. Tiancheng has also been granted contracts to drill for PetroChina. Compared to the other three drilling companies operating in the Jilin oilfield, Tiancheng is the largest, in terms of the number of drilling rigs owned in house. Tiancheng was started with only two rigs at the end of 2007, and now has eight drilling teams with the same number of rigs, which include two 4,000 meters rig (capable drill down to ~13,000 feet depth), three 3,000 meters rigs (~9,800 feet) and three 2,000 meters rigs (~6,500 feet) respectively.
Tiancheng enters into drilling contracts with PetroChina and other private oil companies to provide oilfield drilling services, and generates revenue based on the depth of each well drilled for clients. Clients will typically pay 30% of the total projected drilling costs as a down payment to start the drilling process, and pay the remaining balance within 12 months according to the specific contract term.
In the first nine months of 2010, Tiancheng has completed contracts to drill 156 wells. The total drilling depth accomplished this year is 243,730meters (~799,639feet), with the revenue of $10,132,841.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared To Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
Revenues. Revenues for the Current Quarter were $19,986,267 compared to $14,403,921 for the Comparable Quarter, an increase of $5,582,346, or 39%. This increase was mainly due to revenue of $10,132,841 from drilling services performed by Tiancheng during the Current Period. The average oil price for the Current Quarter was $72.3, a 12% increase from $64.33 for the Comparable Quarter. Our output of crude oil for the Current Quarter was 135,473 barrels compared to 224,219 barrels for the Comparable Quarter, a decrease of 40%.This decrease in production was mainly due to: (i) no additional wells were drilled in the Current Quarter; (ii) the unexpected flood resulted from heavy storm and earlier raining season.
Cost of sales. Cost of sales increased by 42%, from $5,131,033 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $7,270,963 for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in cost of sales resulted primarily from drilling costs and depreciation of $3,540,863 as a result of our new drilling services operation, but offset by a decrease on the Depreciation, depletion and amortization of oil properties, which was $1,294,078 for the Current Quarter compared to $2,369,888 for the Comparable Quarter, the main reason was due to revised reserve report. For the Current Quarter, the Company paid an oil surcharge of $1,495,917 to the PRC government as compared to $1,655,000 paid for the Comparable Quarter. Under a regulation introduced in June 2006, a surcharge is imposed on the portion of the selling price of crude oil as set forth in the table below.
Crude Price $/Bbl
|
|
Surcharge Rate
|
$40-45
|
|
20%
|
$45-50
|
|
25%
|
$50-55
|
|
30%
|
$55-60
|
|
35%
|
Above $60
|
|
40%
|
For example, if the MOPS China oil price is $57 per barrel, the oil surcharge is $4.45 per barrel ($1+$1.25+$1.5+$0.7); if the oil price is $75 per barrel, the oil surcharge is $11.5 per barrel ($1+$1.25+$1.5+$1.75+$6).
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses totaled $2,280,559 for the Current Quarter, compared to $1,121,031 for the Comparable Quarter, an increase of 103%. The increase was primarily due to the increase of our sellling, general and adminstrative expenses from $855,138 in the Comparable Quarter to $1,801,405 in the Current Quarter as a result of new drilling operation this year. In addition, the professional fees and consulting fees were increasing from $ 105,225 and $89,265 in the Comparable Quarter to $160,000 and $224,750 in the Current Quarter respectively as a result of our recent restatement of our financial statements.
Other Income (Expense). Other income for the Current Quarter was $111,499 compared to other income of $1,976,513 for the Comparable Quarter. This decrease was primarily the result of the change in fair value of warrants. Furthermore, the interest payment reduced significantly from $236,931 in the Comparable Quarter to $2,246 in the Current Quarter, which resulted by making repayment of the whole principal of the loan to the Fund at the beginning this year.
Net Income. Net income for the Current Quarter is $6,857,142 compared $7,468,195 of the Comparable Quarter. The decrease is primarily the result of the increased tax and expenses associated with new added drilling operation and the other non-cash expenses such as change in fair value of warrants.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared To Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
Revenues. Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were $76,621,745 compared to $34,654,549 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $41,967,196, or 121%. This increase was due to the additional revenue $34,731,330 generated from drilling services of Tiancheng during the Current Period as well as the increase of oil price drove up the oil sales revenue The average oil price for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $74, a 42% increase from $52 for the same period in 2009. Our output of crude oil for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was 561,875 barrels compared to 671,351 barrels for the same period in 2009, a decrease of 16%. This slightly decrease in production was mainly due to: (i) only 3 additional wells were drilled in the Current Period; (ii) the temporary production shut down due to unexpected flood resulted from heavy storm and longer raining season.
Cost of sales. Cost of sales increased by $15,703,349 or 123%, from $12,736,803 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $28,440,152 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in cost of sales resulted primarily from drilling costs and depreciation of $13,926,639 for the nine months ended September, 2010 and an increase in the oil surcharge paid to the PRC government, due to the increase in oil prices generally. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company paid an oil surcharge of $6,498,555 to the PRC government as compared to $2,273,167 paid for the same period in 2009.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses totaled $5,032,870 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to $16,733,245 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of 70%. This decrease is primarily a result of a decrease of $13,833,812 in impairment of oil properties from the Comparable Period as compared to none in the Current Period. On the other hand, the selling, general and administrative costs increased from $2,252,285 in the Comparable Period to $3,944,810 in the Current Period due to the higher overhead and administrative expenses associated new drilling operation. Also the consulting fees increased significantly from $159,260 in the Comparable Period to $449,500 in the Current Period, mainly as a result of the recent restatement of the financial statements
Other Income (Expense). Other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $25,507,189 compared to other expenses of $19,749,779 for the same period in 2009. The increase is primarily the result of a significant non-cash gain on the changes in the fair value of warrants, plus the decrease of interest expense as well as decrease of expenses associated various non-cash items such as the loss on extinguishment of debt.
Net Income. Net income was $53,589,619 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to net loss of $17,387,982 for the same period in 2009. The increase was the result of the decrease of expense associated with the impairment of oil properties, loss on extinguishment of debt and the change in fair value of warrants as well as the increase of the total revenue generated from new added drilling services operation.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We have historically financed our operations and capital expenditures through cash flows from operations, the issuance of secured debt and the issuance of new shares of our common stock. Our capital resources consist primarily of cash flows from our oil producing properties and oilfield drilling services operation. Our level of earnings and cash flows depend upon many factors, including the price we receive for crude oil we produce.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $50,520,855, other current assets of $24,198,382 and current liabilities of $16,481,865. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, our primary sources of liquidity were $26,909,019 provided by operating activities. This cash balance of $50,520,855 represents an increase of $21,827,723 over our cash balance as of December 31, 2009.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $26,909,019 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $10,675,933 for the same period in 2009. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities was the result of a number of changes in our operating accounts. Cash from operating activities increased due to a significant increase in net income to offset the higher change in fair value of warrants, higher cash payments of income and other taxes, also offset the increase in accounts receivable in the Current Period compared to the Comparable Period.
Net cash used in investing activities was $1,757,868 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $11,048,307 for the same period in 2009. This decrease is primarily due to no new wells have been drilled during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Net cash used in financing activities was $4,526,986 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to net cash provided by $20,327,004 for the same period in 2009. This was primarily a result of the repayment of secured debenture to Lotusbox during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
The Company has paid for the development of its producing oil wells and oil wells under construction, along with its acquisition of an oil well drilling and servicing company, with cash from operations as well as by funds raised through the issuance of secured debt, common stock and warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock. The Company is continually evaluating opportunities to expand production and grow the Company’s operations. The Company may require additional resources to fully implement the Company’s business plan and growth strategy. Our ability to obtain additional capital to achieve certain of these expansion goals will depend on market conditions, national and global economies and other factors beyond its control. We cannot assure you that the Company will be able to implement or capitalize on various financing alternatives or otherwise obtain required capital, the need for which could be substantial given the Company’s business and development goals. However, the Company anticipates that cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund continued development at the four oil fields it currently operates and to fund continued operations at its oil well drilling and servicing subsidiary.
Crude Oil Price Trends
Changes in crude oil prices significantly affect our revenues, financial condition and cash flows. Markets for crude oil have historically been volatile and we expect this trend to continue. Prices for crude oil typically fluctuate in response to relatively minor changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty, seasonal, economic, political and other factors beyond our control. Although we are unable to accurately predict the prices we receive for our oil, any significant or sustained decline in oil prices may materially adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity, ability to obtain future debt or equity financing and operating results.
Production Trends
Like all other oil exploration and production companies, we experience natural production declines at existing wells. We recognize that oil production from a given well naturally decreases over time and that a downward trend in our overall production could occur unless the natural declines are offset by additional production from new wells, investment in measures to increase the production from existing wells (such as CO2 and water injection), or acquisitions of producing properties. If any production declines we experience are other than a temporary trend, and if we cannot economically replace our reserves, our results may be materially adversely affected and our stock price may decline. Our future growth will depend upon our ability to continue to add oil reserves in excess of our production at a reasonable cost.
We have achieved increased production and revenue from our four oilfields as a result of our significant investments in these areas. As of September 30, 2010, we have drilled 292 wells out of the 675 wells that we believe can be drilled in our four oilfields. We anticipate that we will continue to drill new wells and increase production in these areas. We are also actively seeking additional oil fields that we can lease and operate.
Operating Expense Trends
Costs associated with oil well drilling, improvement (e.g. fracturing and water injection), and maintenance in the northeastern Chinese oil fields where we operate have remained relatively constant over the past year. Similarly, service rates charged by oil field service companies have remained relatively constant over the past year. We are also generally somewhat buffered from changes in world oil prices due to the impact of the government oil surcharge tax. When prices rise, the amount of oil surcharge tax that we are required to pay increases; conversely price declines reduce the amount of oil surcharge tax. In the Current Quarter, the approximate amount of oil surcharge tax we paid was $1,495,917, as compared to $1,655,000 in the Comparable Quarter.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Proved Reserves. Proved oil and gas reserves, as defined by SEC Regulation S-X Rule 4-10(a) (2)(i), (2)(ii), (2)(iii), (3) and (4), are the estimated quantities of crude oil that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions, i.e., prices and costs as of the date the estimate is made. Prices include consideration of changes in existing prices provided only by contractual arrangements, but not on escalations based upon future conditions.
The Company’s estimates of proved reserves are made using available geological and reservoir data as well as production performance data. These estimates, made by the Company’s engineers, are reviewed annually and revised, either upward or downward, as warranted by additional data. Revisions are necessary due to changes in, among other things, reservoir performance, prices, economic conditions and governmental restrictions. Decreases in prices, for example, may cause a reduction in some proved reserves due to reaching economic limits sooner.
Properties and Equipment. The Company uses the full cost method of accounting for exploration and development activities as defined by the SEC. Under this method of accounting, the costs of unsuccessful, as well as successful, exploration and development activities are capitalized as properties and equipment. This includes any internal costs that are directly related to exploration and development activities but does not include any costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities. Gain or loss on the sale or other disposition of oil properties is not recognized, unless the gain or loss would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves of oil and natural gas attributable to a country. The application of the full cost method of accounting for oil properties generally results in higher capitalized costs and higher depreciation, depletion and amortization rates compared to the successful efforts method of accounting for oil properties.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-03 Extract Activities- Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and Disclosures. This ASU amends the “Extractive Industries- Oil and Gas” topic of the Codification to align the Oil and Gas reserve estimation and disclosure requirements in this Topic with the SEC Release No. 33-8995, “Modification of Oil and Gas Reporting Requirements (Final Rule)”, discussed below. The amendments are effective for annual reporting periods ending on or after December 31, 2009, and the adoption of these provisions on December 31, 2009 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, FASB issued ASU 2010-06 – Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU 2010-6”). ASU 2010-06 provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that requires separate disclosure of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and the presentation of separate information regarding purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements for Level 3 fair value measurements. Additionally, ASU 2010-06 provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that clarifies existing disclosures about the level of disaggregation and inputs and valuation techniques. ASU 2010-06 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-06 to have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial position.
In January 2010, FASB issued ASU 2010-02 Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary a Scope Clarification (“ASU 2010-02”). ASU 2010-02 addresses implementation issues related to the changes in ownership provisions in the Consolidation-Overall Subtopic (Subtopic 810-10) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, originally issued as FASB Statement No.160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. Subtopic 810-10 establishes the accounting and reporting guidance for noncontrolling interests and changes in ownership interests of a subsidiary. An entity is required to deconsolidate a subsidiary when the entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest in the subsidiary. Upon deconsolidation of a subsidiary, an entity recognizes a gain or loss on the transaction and measures any retained investment in the subsidiary at fair value. The gain or loss includes any gain or loss associated with the difference between the fair value of the retained investment in the subsidiary and its carrying amount at the date the subsidiary is deconsolidated. In contrast, an entity is required to account for a decrease in ownership interest of a subsidiary that does not result in a change of control of the subsidiary as an equity transaction. ASU 2010-02 is effective for the Company starting January 3, 2010. The company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-02 to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.
In February 2010, FASB issued ASU 2010-09 Subsequent Events (Topic 855) Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2010-09”). ASU 2010-09 amends disclosure requirements within Subtopic 855-10. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change alleviates potential conflicts between Subtopic 855-10 and the SEC’s requirements. ASU 2010-09 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-09 to have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial position.
In April 2010, FASB issued ASU 2010-13 Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades. ASU 2010-13 addresses the classification of a share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which the underlying equity security trades (“ASU 2010-13”). Topic 718 is amended to clarify that a share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity securities trades shall not be considered to contain a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, such an award is not to be classified as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity classification. The amendments in this Update should be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010.The guidance should be applied by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings for all outstanding awards as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which the amendments are initially applied. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of ASU2010-13 on our financial statements.
In March 2010, FASB issued ASU 2010-11 Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives (“ASU2010-11”). ASU 2010-11 clarifies the type of embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded derivative bifurcation requirements. Only one form of embedded credit derivative qualifies for the exemption-one that is related only to the subordination of one financial instrument to another. As a result, entities that have contracts containing an embedded credit derivative feature in a form other than such subordination may need to separately account for the embedded credit derivative feature. The amendments in this Update are effective for each reporting entity at the beginning of its first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted at the beginning of each entity’s first fiscal quarter beginning after issuance of this Update. The Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of ASU 2010-11 on our financial statements.
In August 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Updates No. 2010-21 (ASU No. 2010-21) “Accounting for Technical Amendments to Various SEC Rules and Schedules” and No. 2010-22 (ASU No. 2010-22) “Accounting for Various Topics—Technical Corrections to SEC Paragraphs”. ASU No. 2010-21 amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of Release No. 33-9026: Technical Amendments to Rules, Forms, Schedules and Codifications of Financial Reporting Policies. ASU No. 2010-22 amends various SEC paragraphs based on external comments received and the issuance of SAB 112, which amends or rescinds portions of certain SAB topics. Both ASU No. 2010-21 and ASU No. 2010-22 are effective upon issuance. The amendments in ASU No. 2010-21 and No. 2010-22 will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not required.
ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Evaluation Date”). The purpose of this evaluation is to determine if, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were operating effectively such that the information, required to be disclosed in our Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) reports (i) was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) was accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not operating effectively.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time period specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Deficiencies Relating to Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
We recently completed an internal review of our financial reporting. As a result of this review, management and the audit committee concluded that the impact of certain non-cash accounting and disclosure errors on previously issued financial statements was material and required a restatement. The audit committee of our board of directors engaged an outside consulting firm to assist in its investigation of financial reporting revisions. Our investigation found that a number of factors at the Company contributed to the need to restate certain financial reports in order to correct non-cash accounting errors, including the following:
·
|
the Company lacked adequate internal guidance or training on the reporting of certain non-cash accounting topics, such as warrant accounting, calculation of the ceiling test value of its oil properties, calculation of depreciation, depletion and amortization of oil properties, evaluation of the conditions which trigger the accounting treatment of a restructuring of terms of a liability as an extinguishment of debt, and accounting for stock issued to employees as compensation;
|
·
|
the Company lacked adequate internal controls over the calculation methodologies used in calculation of depreciation, depletion and amortization, and of the ceiling test value, on its oil properties.
|
As part of its investigation, the audit committee proposed a number of recommendations, including the following:
·
|
provide periodic training for employees on accounting and financial reporting practices, particularly with respect to oil industry measurements and disclosures;
|
·
|
retain an outside consulting firm with expertise in financial accounting and oil industry accounting and disclosure matters, to assist the management team with its preparation of quarterly and annual financial reports; and
|
·
|
institute and cultivate a culture of excellence with respect to accounting and financial reporting practices to ensure that the foregoing contributing factors do not recur.
|
The board of directors has accepted the recommendations proposed by the audit committee, and the board of directors implemented and resolved to continue to implement all of the recommendations.
Consequently, we have revised our financial reports for the periods from March 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009. This report, as well as specific information regarding its impact, is discussed in Note 1, “Restatement” to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Restatement of previously issued financial statements to reflect the correction of a misstatement is an indicator of the existence of a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting as defined in the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Auditing Standard No. 2, “An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction with an Audit of Financial Statements.” We have identified deficiencies in our internal controls that did not prevent the misstatement of certain non-cash accounting items. These deficiencies, which we believe constituted a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, included inadequate training and understanding of the SEC and accounting rules for booking certain non-cash accounting items, including items specific to oil industry reporting. In light of the determination that previously issued financial statements should be restated, our management concluded that a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting existed as of September 30, 2009 and disclosed this matter to the audit committee, and our independent registered public accounting firm.
Remedial Actions
Our management, at the direction of our board of directors, is actively working to improve the control environment and to implement controls and procedures that will ensure the integrity of our financial statement preparation process.
We have implemented the following actions to mitigate weaknesses identified:
·
|
we have retained an outside consulting firm with specialized knowledge in financial accounting and specific knowledge of oil industry accounting to assist us with the review and restatement of the financial statements in question.
|
·
|
We have engaged Ernst & Young (China) Advisory Ltd. to assist us to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section of 2002. As part of compliance with SOX 404, our management and our external auditor will examine and report on the adequacy of our internal financial reporting and control systems after documenting and testing financial reporting and control procedures. In addition, Ernst & Young will provide recommendations to our management for instituting necessary additional controls to enhance the risk management capability of the our internal controls over financial reporting.
|
We intend to implement the following additional actions in 2010:
·
|
implement formal and informal training programs, particularly with respect to the accounting for non-cash items;
|
·
|
continue our retention of an outside consulting firm to assist us with a review of financial report preparation.
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Control and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, with the participation of other members of our senior management, reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. In making this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer considered the issues discussed above, together with the remedial steps we have taken. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, because of the material weakness discussed above, as of June 30, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-(f) of the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer, and our Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework, our management concluded we did not maintain effective controls over our financial reporting for the periods from March 31, 2008 to December 31, 2009, and these ineffective controls constituted a material weakness. As a result of this material weakness, our financial statements for the quarters ended March 31, 2008, June 30, 2008, September 30, 2008, March 31, 2009, June 30, 2009, and September 30, 2009, and the year ended December 31, 2008 were restated. These restatements affected certain non-cash items, including accounting for warrants, the Company’s proved oil properties, depreciation, depletion and amortization of oil properties, the ceiling test write-down of oil properties accounts, and accounting for the effect of a restructuring of a liability. Because of this material weakness, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the COSO.
Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 has not been audited by Baker Tilly Hong Kong Limited (successor to Jimmy Cheung & Co.), an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During 2010, we implemented the following actions to improve our control environment and to implement controls and procedures that will ensure the integrity of our financial reporting process:
·
|
we have retained an outside consulting firm with specialized knowledge in financial accounting and specific knowledge of oil industry accounting to assist us with the review and restatement of the financial statements in question.
|
We intend to implement the following additional actions in 2010:
·
|
implement formal and informal training programs, particularly with respect to the accounting for non-cash items; and
|
·
|
continue our retention of an outside consulting firm to assist us with a review of financial report preparation.
|
Except as discussed above, there has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our quarter ended September 30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is involved in a variety of claims, suits, investigations and proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of its business, including actions with respect to contracts and other matters. These actions may be commenced by a number of different constituents, including competitors, partners, clients, current or former employees, government and regulatory agencies, stockholders, and representatives of the locations in which we do business. The following is a discussion of some of the more significant legal matters involving the Company.
Recently, purported shareholders of the Company filed six purported legal actions, three of which are securities class actions and three of which are shareholder derivative actions, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company and certain officers and directors. The three class actions assert claims under the federal securities laws and the three derivative actions assert common law claims based on breach of duty.
The six actions are: (1) Rosado v. China North East Petroleum Holdings Limited, et al., 10-CV-4577-MGC-THK, filed June 11, 2010; (2) Weissmann v. China North East Petroleum Holdings Limited, et al., 10-CV-4775-MGC-THK, filed June 18, 2010; (3) Moore v. China North East Petroleum Holdings Limited, et al., 10-CV-5263-MGC-THK, filed July 9, 2010; (4) Strickland v. Hongjun, et al., 10-CV-5445-RMB-JLC, filed July 19, 2010; (5) Drobner v. Hongjun, et al., 10-CV-6319-RMB-GWG, filed August 23, 2010; and (6) Nicoln v. Hongjun, et al., 10-CV-6344-RMB-JLC, filed August 24, 2010.
The time for the Company to respond formally to these lawsuits has not come. In addition, the complaints do not specify an amount of damages that plaintiffs seek. Because these matters are in very early stages, we cannot comment on whether an adverse outcome is probable or otherwise. While we believe we have meritorious defenses to each of these actions and intend to defend them vigorously, an adverse outcome in one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There has been no material change in the Company’s risk factors as previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 30, 2009 and as amended and filed on September 1, 2010.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
CHINA NORTH EAST PETROLEUM HOLDINGS LTD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 19, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/ Jingfu Li |
|
|
|
Jingfu Li |
|
|
|
Acting Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: November 19, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/ Shaohui Chen |
|
|
|
Shaohui Chen |
|
|
|
Acting Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer |
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|