UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Filed by the Registrant  x

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

---

 

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held May 20, 2015

Dear Stockholders:

You are cordially invited to attend our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or the Annual Meeting, which will be held at the offices of Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc., located at 11045 Roselle Street, San Diego, California 92121, on Wednesday, May 20, 2015, at 3:00 p.m., local time.

We are holding the Annual Meeting for the following purposes, as more fully described in the accompanying Proxy Statement:

All of our stockholders of record as of March 27, 2015, are entitled to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting and at any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting.

Our board of directors recommends that you vote FOR the election of each of the director nominees named in Proposal 1 and FOR the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm as provided in Proposal 2.

Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to read this Proxy Statement and submit your proxy or voting instructions as soon as possible. For specific instructions on how to vote your shares, please refer to the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials you received in the mail, the section entitled “How can I vote my shares?” in this Proxy Statement or, if you requested to receive printed proxy materials, the enclosed proxy card.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Sincerely,

Kim D. Blickenstaff

President and Chief Executive Officer

San Diego, California

April 9, 2015

Approximate Date of Mailing of Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials: April 9, 2015

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

(i)

---

 

 

 

 

(ii)

---

 

 

 

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE

2015 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON MAY 20, 2015

Our board of directors is soliciting proxies for use at our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders, or the Annual Meeting, to be held on Wednesday, May 20, 2015, at 3:00 p.m., local time, at the offices of Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc., located at 11045 Roselle Street, San Diego, California 92121. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. is sometimes referred to herein as “we”, “us”, “our” or the “Company.”

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

The following questions and answers are intended to briefly address potential questions that our stockholders may have regarding this Proxy Statement and the Annual Meeting. They are also intended to provide our stockholders with certain information that is required to be provided under the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. These questions and answers may not address all of the questions that are important to you as a stockholder. If you have additional questions about the Proxy Statement or the Annual Meeting, please see the response to the question entitled “Whom shall I contact with other questions?” below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

The procedures for voting are as follows:

Stockholder of Record

If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting. Alternatively, you may vote by proxy through the Internet, by phone or by mail as described below. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote by proxy to ensure your vote is counted. You may still attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person if you have already voted by proxy.

Beneficial Owner

If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, bank or other agent, you should have received a Notice or a proxy card and voting instructions with these proxy materials from that organization rather than from us. Simply follow the instructions in the Notice received from your broker, bank or other agent to vote your shares. To vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from your broker, bank or other agent.

 

Stockholder of Record

If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy in one of the four following ways:

Your most current Internet proxy or proxy card will be the one that is counted at the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owner

If you are a beneficial owner of shares, you may revoke your proxy by following instructions provided by your broker, bank or other agent.

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Board Structure

We currently have nine members of our board of directors. Under our charter and bylaws, our board is divided into three classes, as follows:

Upon the expiration of the initial term of office for each class of directors, each director in such class shall be elected for a term of three years and serve until a successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal.

Directors may only be removed with cause by the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares then entitled to vote upon an election of directors. Because only one-third of our directors will be elected at each annual meeting of stockholders, two consecutive annual meetings of stockholders could be required for the stockholders to change a majority of our board of directors. Any additional directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directors or a vacancy may be filled by the directors then in office.

Election of Directors

At the Annual Meeting, our stockholders are being asked to vote for the Class II director nominees listed below to serve on our board of directors until our annual meeting in 2018 and until each of their successors has been elected and qualified, or until such director’s death, resignation or removal. Each of these nominees is a current member of our board of directors, whose term expires at the Annual Meeting. Each of these nominees has consented to serve, if elected.

Provided that a quorum of stockholders is present at the Annual Meeting, directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the stockholders entitled to vote on this proposal at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions, broker non-votes and votes withheld will not be treated as votes cast for this purpose and, therefore, will not affect the outcome of the election.

If no contrary indication is made, proxies will be voted for the nominees, or in the event that any nominee is not a candidate or is unable to serve as a director at the time of the election, for any nominee who is designated by our board of directors to fill the vacancy.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” ALL DIRECTOR NOMINEES

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

Nominees for Director

The following table lists the persons recommended by the nominating and corporate governance committee of our board of directors and nominated by our board of directors to be elected as directors, including relevant information as of March 31, 2015 regarding their age, business experience, qualifications, attributes, skills and other directorships:

Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors

For a Three-Year Term Expiring at the

2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

(Class II Directors)

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

Members of Our Board of Directors

The following table lists the members of our board of directors that are continuing in office, including relevant information as of March 31, 2015 regarding their age, business experience, qualifications, attributes, skills and other directorships:

Members of the Board of Directors Continuing in Office Term Expiring at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

(Class III Directors)

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

Term Expiring at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

(Class I Directors)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Director Independence

Our board of directors has affirmatively determined that Messrs. Dick P. Allen, Edward L. Cahill, Fred E. Cohen, Howard E. Greene, Jr., Douglas A. Roeder, Jesse I. Treu, Lonnie M. Smith and Christopher J. Twomey meet the definition of “independent director” under the applicable NASDAQ Listing Rules.

Family Relationships

 

There are no family relationships between any director, executive officer or person nominated to become a director or executive director.

Agreements with Directors

 

None of the directors or nominees for director was selected pursuant to any arrangement or understanding, other than with the directors of the Company acting within their capacity as such.

Legal Proceedings with Directors

 

There are no legal proceedings related to any of the directors or director nominees which require disclosure pursuant to Items 103 or 401(f) of Regulation S-K.

Board Leadership Structure

 

The positions of Chairman of the board and chief executive officer are presently separated. We believe that separating these positions allows our chief executive officer to focus on our day-to-day business, while allowing the Chairman of the board to lead our board of directors in its fundamental role of providing advice to and independent oversight of management. Our board of directors recognizes the time, effort and energy that the chief executive officer is required to devote to his position in the current business environment, as well as the commitment required to serve as our Chairman, particularly as our board of directors’ oversight responsibilities continue to grow. While our amended and restated bylaws and corporate governance principles do not require that our Chairman and chief executive officer positions be separate, our board of directors believes that having separate positions is the appropriate leadership structure for us at this time and demonstrates our commitment to good corporate governance.

Board Role in Risk Oversight

 

Risk is inherent with every business, and how well a business manages risk can ultimately determine its success. We face a number of risks, including risks relating to our operations, strategic direction and intellectual property. Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of risks we face, while our board of directors, as a whole and through its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. In its risk oversight role, our board of directors has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are adequate and functioning as designed.

The role of our board of directors in overseeing the management of our risks is conducted primarily through committees of our board of directors, as disclosed in the descriptions of each of the committees below and in the charters of each of the committees. The full board of directors (or the appropriate board committee in the case of risks that are under the purview of a particular committee) discusses with management our major risk exposures, their potential impact on us, and the steps we take to manage them. When a board committee is responsible for evaluating and overseeing the management of a particular risk or risks, the Chairman of the relevant committee reports on the discussion to the full board of directors during the committee reports portion of the next board meeting.

 

 

---

 

Board and Committee Meetings

 

During 2014, our board of directors met four times (including telephonic meetings) and took action by written consent four times. Each director attended at least 75% of the meetings held by the Board and for each Committee on which he served while he was a director, either in person or by teleconference, during the year.

Director Attendance at Annual Meetings

 

Although we do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of our board of directors at our annual meetings of stockholders, we encourage all of our directors to attend.

Executive Sessions

 

In accordance with the applicable NASDAQ Listing Rules, our independent directors meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions at which only independent directors are present.

Board Committees

 

Our board of directors has three standing committees: the audit committee, the compensation committee, and the nominating and corporate governance committee. In addition, from time to time, special committees may be established under the direction of our board of directors when necessary to address specific issues. For instance, we also have a pricing committee to determine the offering price and other terms of any financing we may pursue in the future using our currently effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3.

Each of the three standing committees has a written charter that has been approved by our board of directors. A copy of each charter is available on our website at www.tandemdiabetes.com by selecting the “Investor Center” icon at the bottom of the page, followed by the “Corporate Governance” hyperlink. However, the information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference in, or considered part of, this Proxy Statement.

The current members of each committee are identified in the following table:

 

Audit Committee

During 2014, our audit committee met five times (including telephonic meetings) and did not take any action by written consent. Each of the members of the audit committee has been determined to be an independent director under applicable SEC rules and the applicable NASDAQ Listing Rules. Our board of directors has affirmatively determined that Mr. Twomey is designated as an “audit committee financial expert.”

Our audit committee’s responsibilities include:

 

 

---

 

Compensation Committee

During 2014, our compensation committee met three times (including telephonic meetings) and took action by written consent once. Each of the members of the compensation committee has been determined to be an independent director under the applicable NASDAQ Listing Rules.

Our compensation committee’s responsibilities include:

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

During 2014, our nominating and corporate governance committee met three times (including telephonic meetings) and did not take any action by written consent. Each of the members of the nominating and corporate governance committee has been determined to be an independent director under the applicable NASDAQ Listing Rules.

Our nominating and corporate governance committee’s responsibilities include:

 

 

---

 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 

None of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee (or other committee performing equivalent functions) of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our board of directors or compensation committee. No interlocking relationship exists between any member of the board of directors and any member of the compensation committee (or other committee performing equivalent functions) of any other company.

We have entered into an indemnification agreement with each of our directors, including Dick P. Allen, Douglas A. Roeder and Howard E. Greene, Jr., who comprise our compensation committee.

Director Nomination Process

 

The goal of our nominating and corporate governance committee, which we refer to as the committee for purposes of this section, is to assemble a well-rounded board of directors that consists of directors with backgrounds that are complementary to one another, reflecting a variety of experiences, skills and expertise. The committee’s current selection criteria for prospective nominees, as set forth in the committee’s charter, are as follows:

In considering whether to recommend any candidate for inclusion in the slate of recommended nominees for our board of directors, including candidates recommended by stockholders, the committee applies the criteria set forth above.

While we do not have a policy regarding board diversity, it is one of a number of factors that the committee takes into account in identifying nominees.

The committee believes it is appropriate for our President and Chief Executive Officer to serve as a member of our board of directors.

The committee currently has a policy of evaluating nominees recommended by stockholders in the same manner as it evaluates other nominees. We do not intend to treat stockholder recommendations in any manner different from other recommendations. Under our amended and restated bylaws, stockholders wishing to propose a director nominee should send the required information to our corporate secretary. We have not received director candidate recommendations from our stockholders.

Codes of Conduct and Ethics

 

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer and other senior financial officers (our Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance and other senior financial officers performing similar functions), which is designed to meet the requirements of Item 406 of Regulation S-K. We have also adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, which is designed to meet the requirements of the applicable NASDAQ Listing Rules. Each of these documents is available on our website at www.tandemdiabetes.com by selecting the “Investor Center” icon at the bottom of the page, followed by the “Corporate Governance” hyperlink. However, the information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference in, or considered part of, this Proxy Statement.

Stockholder Communications with our Board of Directors

 

Stockholders seeking to communicate with our board of directors, as a whole, may send such communication to: Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc., 11045 Roselle St., San Diego, CA 92121, Attention: General Counsel. Stockholders seeking to communicate with an individual director, in his or her capacity as a member of our board of directors, may send such communication to the same address to the attention of such individual director. We will promptly forward any such stockholder communication to each director to whom such stockholder communication is addressed to the address specified by each such director.

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

During 2014, pursuant to our director compensation program, we paid our non-employee directors a cash retainer for service on our board of directors and an additional amount for service on each committee on which the director is a member. The Chairman of each committee receives higher retainers for such service. Under the program, the annual fees paid to non-employee directors for service on our board of directors and for service on each committee of our board of directors on which the director is a member were as follows:

 

In June 2014 we implemented the Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”). Each of our non-employee directors is eligible to participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan and is able to elect to defer up to 100% of his cash retainer into the plan. During 2014 none of our non-employee directors elected to participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan.

Under our director compensation program, each non-employee director first elected to our board of directors will receive an option to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock upon his or her initial election to our board of directors. Each of these options will vest in equal monthly installments over a period of 36 months following the grant date, subject to the individual’s continued service as a director. Further, annually on November 15 of each year (or on the next business day if the 15th is a day on which financial markets are not operating), each non-employee director then serving on our board of directors will receive an option to purchase an additional 17,000 shares of our common stock (subject to pro-ration for each full month of service on our board of directors prior to such date). Each of these options will vest in equal monthly installments over a period of 12 months following the grant date, subject to the individual’s continued service as a director. The exercise price of all options granted to our non-employee directors will equal the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Each of these stock options, as well as any other equity awards to non-employee directors, is expected to be made pursuant to our 2013 Stock Incentive Plan, or 2013 Plan. For additional information, see “Executive Compensation—2013 Stock Incentive Plan.”

In November 2014, each non-employee director received an option to purchase 17,000 shares of our common stock in accordance with the terms of our director compensation program, described above.

We also reimburse our non-employee directors for reasonable travel and out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending our board of director and committee meetings.

The director compensation program is intended to provide a total compensation package that enables us to attract and retain qualified and experienced individuals to serve as directors and to align our directors’ interests with those of our stockholders.

Director Compensation Table

 

The following table sets forth compensation information with respect to all of our non-employee directors for amounts earned during 2014.

 

 

 

---

 

The aggregate number of shares subject to outstanding stock option awards for each of our non-employee directors as of December 31, 2014 was as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Our audit committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2015. Although not required by applicable law, or our charter or bylaws, as a matter of good corporate governance, we are asking our stockholders to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountants. Ernst & Young LLP has audited our financial statements since 2008.

We expect that representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders. Additionally, the representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be required to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP. Abstentions will be counted toward the tabulation of votes cast on this proposal and will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes will be counted toward a quorum but not counted for any purpose in determining whether this proposal has been approved.

If our stockholders fail to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, our audit committee will reconsider whether to retain the firm. Even if the selection is ratified, our audit committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of different independent registered public accountants at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A “FOR” VOTE FOR THIS PROPOSAL

Audit and All Other Fees

 

The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for the audit of our annual financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and fees billed for other services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP during those periods. 

 

Our audit committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the independence of Ernst & Young LLP, and has concluded that the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining the independence of our auditors.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Our audit committee has established a policy that all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm will be pre-approved by the audit committee. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Our audit committee considers whether the provision of each non-audit service is compatible with maintaining the independence of our auditors. Pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. Our independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to our audit committee regarding the extent of services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date.

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The audit committee oversees our financial reporting process on behalf of the Company’s board of directors, but management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the audit committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 with management, including a discussion of any significant changes in the selection or application of accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements and the effect of any new accounting initiatives.

The audit committee reviewed and discussed with Ernst & Young LLP, which is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, its judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company’s accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the audit committee under generally accepted auditing standards, including Auditing Standard No. 16, “Communication with Audit Committees” of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. In addition, the audit committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP, its independence from management and the Company, has received from Ernst & Young LLP the written disclosures and the letter required by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule 3526 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees), and has considered the compatibility of non-audit services with the auditors’ independence.

We have met with Ernst & Young LLP to discuss the overall scope of its services, the results of its audit and reviews, its evaluation of the Company’s internal controls and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting. Ernst & Young LLP, as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, also periodically updates the audit committee about new accounting developments and their potential impact on the Company’s reporting. Our meetings with Ernst & Young LLP were held with and without management present. Members of the audit committee are not employed by the Company, nor does the audit committee provide any expert assurance or professional certification regarding the Company’s financial statements. We rely, without independent verification, on the accuracy and integrity of the information provided, and representations made, by management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, we recommended to the board of directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. We and the Company’s board of directors also recommended, subject to stockholder approval, the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015.

This report of the audit committee shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.

The foregoing report has been furnished by the audit committee.

Respectfully submitted,

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Christopher J. Twomey, Chairman

Edward L. Cahill

Lonnie M. Smith

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Our executive officers, and their respective ages and positions with us as of March 31, 2015, are as follows:

 

Mr. Blickenstaff’s biography can be found under the heading “Proposal 1—Election of Directors.”

Robert B. Anacone has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer since April 2013. Mr. Anacone served as our Senior Vice President, Business Development, Marketing and Sales, from February 2009 to April 2013. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Anacone served as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Marketing and Sales, of Biosite from October 2005 to June 2007, and as Senior Vice President and General Manager from July 2007 to June 2008. Mr. Anacone holds a B.S. in Economics from the University of Hartford.

David B. Berger has served as our General Counsel since August 2013 and, as of January 2015, also serves as our Corporate Secretary. From January 2008 until August 2013, he served as Vice President and General Counsel of Senomyx, Inc. (NASDAQ: SNMX) and was promoted to Senior Vice President in January 2012. He served as Corporate Secretary of Senomyx from January 2008 until May 2014. From April 2003 until October 2007, Mr. Berger was responsible for all commercial aspects of legal affairs at Biosite. At Biosite, Mr. Berger most recently held the position of Vice President, Legal Affairs. Previously, Mr. Berger was an attorney at Cooley Godward LLP and Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Mr. Berger holds a B.A. in Economics from the University of California, Berkeley and a J.D. from Stanford Law School.

John Cajigas has served as our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since May 2008. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Cajigas served in various accounting and finance positions, most recently as Vice President, Finance, of Biosite from August 1995 until August 2007. Prior to joining Biosite, Mr. Cajigas worked as an Audit Manager with Ernst & Young LLP, working primarily with clients in the technology and biotechnology industries. Mr. Cajigas is a certified public accountant (inactive) and holds a B.S. in Business Administration from San Diego State University.

Susan M. Morrison has served as our Chief Administrative Officer since September 2013. From April 2013 until September 2013, she served as our Vice President, Human Resources, Corporate and Investor Relations. Ms. Morrison served as our Director, Corporate and Investor Relations, from January 2009 to March 2013, and was our Director, Corporate Services from November 2007 to December 2008. Prior to joining us, Ms. Morrison held various positions in Corporate and Investor Relations at Biosite from August 2003 through November 2007. Ms. Morrison holds a B.A. in Public Relations from Western Michigan University.

John F. Sheridan has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since April 2013. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Sheridan served as Chief Operating Officer of Rapiscan Systems, Inc., a provider of security equipment and systems, from March 2012 to February 2013. Mr. Sheridan served as Executive Vice President of Research and Development and Operations for Volcano Corporation (NASDAQ: VOLC), a medical technology company, from November 2004 to March 2010. From May 2002 to May 2004, Mr. Sheridan served as Executive Vice President of Operations at CardioNet, Inc., a medical technology company. From March 1998 to May 2002, he served as Vice President of Operations at Digirad Corporation, a medical imaging company. Mr. Sheridan holds a B.S. in Chemistry from the University of West Florida and an M.B.A. from Boston University.

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of January 31, 2015, except as noted in the footnotes below, for:

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to the securities. Shares of common stock that may be acquired by an individual or group within 60 days of January 31, 2015, pursuant to the exercise of options, warrants or other rights, are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of such individual or group, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person shown in the table.

Except as indicated in footnotes to this table, we believe that the stockholders named in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown to be beneficially owned by them, based on information provided to us by such stockholders. The address for each director and executive officer listed is: c/o Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc., 11045 Roselle Street, San Diego, California 92121.

Percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 23,693,607 shares of common stock outstanding as of January 31, 2015.

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

This narrative discussion of the compensation philosophy, objectives, policies and arrangements that apply to our named executive officers and other senior management personnel is intended to assist your understanding of, and to be read together with, the Summary Compensation Table and related disclosures set forth below.

Named Executive Officers

 

Our “named executive officers” include our principal executive officer and our two other most highly compensated executive officers. For 2014, our named executive officers were:

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

 

The primary objective of our executive compensation program is to attract and retain talented executives with the skills necessary to lead us and create long-term value for our stockholders. We recognize that there is significant competition for talented executives, especially in the medical device industry, and it can be particularly challenging for early-stage companies to recruit experienced executives. When establishing our executive compensation program, our compensation committee, which we refer to as the committee for purposes of this “Executive Compensation” section, is guided by the following four principles:

The committee is primarily responsible for developing, reviewing and approving our compensation programs, including the compensation arrangements that apply to our named executive officers, and regularly reporting to our board of directors regarding the adoption of such programs. In particular, the committee is responsible for overseeing our cash and equity incentive plans, including approving individual grants or awards thereunder, with the exception of compensation arrangements for our chief executive officer which must be approved by our independent directors. The committee is also responsible for approving individual and company performance goals and objectives that are relevant to the compensation of our executive officers and other key employees.

The committee evaluates the total compensation of our named executive officers and other executives relative to available compensation information from companies in our industry that are at a similar size and stage of growth. The committee’s historical practice has been to benchmark our executive salaries just above market at the 60th percentile compared to relevant survey data in order to compete in the market for talented executives.

The committee has not established any formal policies or guidelines for allocating between long-term and currently paid compensation, or between cash and non-cash compensation. In determining the amount and mix of compensation elements and whether each element provides the correct incentives in light of our compensation objectives, the committee relies on its judgment and experience rather than adopting a formulaic approach to compensation decisions.

 

 

---

 

Historical Market Comparisons

Historically, the committee has reviewed compensation data from industry compensation surveys as a component of its executive compensation decision making process. For compensation decisions prior to our initial public offering in November 2013, the committee reviewed compensation data provided by (i) Radford Surveys, an independent national technology and life sciences compensation consulting firm, and (ii) Top 5, an independent consulting firm focused on executive compensation, sales force compensation and equity strategy development. The committee also reviewed an executive compensation survey report, which provided compensation data from 206 private, venture-backed life sciences companies.

The committee used the information supplied in the reports and surveys to evaluate the total compensation, as well as each element of compensation, for each executive officer, including the named executive officers. The committee believes it is important to review this compensation data because we compete for executive talent and stockholder investment with the type of companies identified in the reports and surveys.

Independent Compensation Consultant

 

In connection with our initial public offering in November 2013, the committee authorized our management team to engage Barney & Barney to provide compensation consulting services directly to the committee. The scope of the engagement related to services performed in the later part of 2013 and the early part of 2014. More specifically, Barney & Barney was first asked to advise the committee with respect to the process of selecting an appropriate peer group of other publicly traded healthcare companies, and collecting and analyzing compensation data from the companies within such a peer group. That same peer group that was used for purposes of evaluating compensation arrangements in late 2013 was also used to consider compensation arrangements in early 2014. The specific peer group companies were selected in late 2013, immediately prior to our initial public offering, primarily based on their similarities to us primarily based on factors such as revenue, market capitalization, nature of operations, number of employees and location. The peer group data was then used by the committee in 2014 as a tool to determine the appropriate amount and mix of compensation for our executive officers. The peer group at that time was comprised of the following 22 companies in the medical device and biotechnology industry:

 

To the extent the data from our peer group was insufficient as to any specific executive officers, Barney & Barney was authorized to review and analyze relevant data from other market surveys similar to the historical market comparisons that we used prior to our initial public offering.

During 2014, the committee again authorized our management team to engage Barney & Barney to conduct an independent review of our compensation practices for both our non-employee directors as well as our executive officers as compared to a newly identified peer group, and to present the results of such evaluation to the committee. In December 2014 Barney & Barney presented preliminary results of its review to the committee. Barney & Barney also presented a preliminary analysis comparing the outstanding equity awards for our executive officers to the outstanding equity awards held by individuals with similar titles and levels of responsibility within the newly defined proposed peer group. Furthermore, Barney & Barney presented an analysis comparing the current compensation plan for non-employee directors to compensation arrangements for non-employee directors serving on the boards of the companies within the proposed peer group. Following a review and discussion of the composition of the proposed peer group, the committee requested that Barney & Barney consider potential changes to the peer group and present updated recommendations to the committee in early 2015 regarding compensation arrangements for the company’s management and non-employee directors.

 

 

---

 

In January 2015, Barney & Barney presented an updated peer group of companies, which were selected primarily based on their similarities to us, as of the time that the survey was performed, primarily based on factors such as to revenue, market capitalization, nature of operations, number of employees and location. With respect to DexCom and Insulet in particular, the committee recognized that both of those companies were significantly larger than us based on revenue, market capitalization and number of employees, but determined that they should be included in our peer group because of our strong similarities to their respective operations and target customers. The committee also expressed its desire to generally maintain consistency between our peer group for 2014 and our new peer group in 2015. For that reason, in some instances the committee determined to retain a company in our peer group in 2015 that appeared in our 2014 peer group, notwithstanding that it may now fall outside one or more of the preferred criteria.

Accordingly, for 2015 our peer group is currently comprised of the following 26 companies in the medical device and biotechnology industry, of which 17 companies were also part of our peer group during the prior year:

 

Barney & Barney also provided insurance brokerage services to us during 2014 and continues to do so. In particular, during 2014 Barney & Barney earned commission payments totaling approximately $334,000 in connection with insurance brokerage services that they provided to us during the year. We also paid Barney & Barney approximately $32,000 for the compensation consulting services described above during 2014 and early 2015, and $45,000 for the compensation consulting services described above during 2013. However, the committee has considered whether the work of Barney & Barney as a compensation consultant has raised any conflict of interest, taking into account the following factors: (i) the amount of fees paid by us to Barney & Barney as a percentage of that firm’s total revenue; (ii) the provision of other services to us by Barney & Barney; (iii) Barney & Barney’s policies and procedures that are designed to prevent conflicts of interest; (iv) any business or personal relationship of the individual compensation advisors with any member of the committee; (v) any business relationship of Barney & Barney, or business or personal relationship of the individual compensation advisors, with any of our executive officers; and (vi) any of our stock owned by Barney & Barney or the individual compensation advisors. Based on the above factors, the committee has concluded that the work of Barney & Barney and the individual compensation advisors employed by Barney & Barney as compensation consultants to us has not created any conflict of interest. Going forward, the committee intends to assess the independence of any of our compensation advisers consistent with the applicable NASDAQ Listing Rules.

Compensation Elements

 

In light of the committee’s review of the compensation survey data and the additional information provided by Barney & Barney as set forth above, and in furtherance of our compensation philosophy and objectives, the executive compensation program for our named executive officers generally consists of a base salary, a cash incentive program, equity-based awards and other benefits.

Base Salary

We pay base salaries to attract and retain key executives with the necessary experience for our future growth and success. Base salaries provide a base amount of compensation. Base salaries reflect each executive officer’s responsibility level, tenure with us, individual performance and business experience.

The committee establishes base salaries after reviewing industry compensation data as discussed above. In keeping with its philosophy of paying just above market salaries in order to attract executive talent and stay competitive in the market, the committee generally sets base salary at approximately the 60th percentile of the base salaries paid to executives with similar titles and levels of responsibility at the surveyed companies. Salaries are then reviewed periodically and adjusted as warranted in response to updated data regarding comparable market salaries, as well factors such as individual performance and responsibility level.

In January 2015 the committee recommended, and the independent directors of our board of directors approved, the following base salaries for each of our named executive officers:

 

 

 

---

 

 

2014 Cash Bonus Plan

For 2014, we adopted a cash incentive program, or the 2014 Cash Bonus Plan, that applied to each of our executive officers, as well as to certain other senior management personnel. The committee approved the 2014 Cash Bonus Plan because it believes that aligning the payment of cash incentives with the achievement of a specified Company performance objective creates long-term value for us and aligns the compensation of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders.

Under the terms of the 2014 Cash Bonus Plan, cash bonuses could be earned based on our achievement of specified financial performance objectives and product development milestones.  The percentage of the target cash bonus for each named executive officer that is subject to the financial objectives and the product development milestones, respectively, is set forth in the table below:

 

However, under the terms of the 2014 Cash Bonus Plan, our board of directors and the committee also retained the flexibility to consider other factors deemed appropriate in their discretion.

The target cash incentive amount for each named executive officer was set as a percentage of the executive officer’s base salary. Specifically, for Mr. Blickenstaff his target cash incentive under the 2014 Cash Bonus Plan was 75% of his 2014 base salary, and for Messrs. Anacone and Sheridan their target cash incentive was 45% of their respective 2014 base salaries.

In January 2015 the committee determined that we achieved in aggregate approximately 64% of the financial performance objectives and product development milestones under the 2014 Cash Bonus Plan. Based on that level of achievement, the committee awarded Messrs. Blickenstaff, Anacone and Sheridan the payments set forth opposite their names in the table below and did not award any incremental discretionary cash bonus payment:

 

2015 Cash Bonus Plan

For 2015, we adopted a cash incentive plan, or the 2015 Cash Bonus Plan, that will be utilized to calculate the cash bonuses that may become payable to our executive officers and other senior management personnel with respect to fiscal year 2015. With the recommendation of the committee, in January 2015 the independent directors of our board of directors approved the 2015 Cash Bonus Plan in order to align plan participants with our business goals and strategies and to further the objectives of our executive compensation program.

The target cash bonus amount for each plan participant is set as a percentage of the participant’s base salary as determined by the committee. The 2015 base salary, target percentage and resulting target cash bonus amount for each named executive officer is set forth in the table below:

 

Cash bonuses may be earned under the 2015 Cash Bonus Plan based on the achievement of specified financial performance objectives and product development milestones, but the actual cash bonus could be below or above the target based on our actual performance against the pre-determined objectives and milestones.

 

 

---

 

The percentage of the target cash bonus for each plan participant that is subject to the financial performance objectives and the product development milestones, respectively, is set forth in the table below:

 

Bonus payments under the 2015 Cash Bonus Plan, if any, will be made at the discretion of our board of directors or the committee. The financial performance component and product development component of the 2015 Cash Bonus Plan may be earned independent of one another. If we do not achieve either the financial performance component or the product development component of the 2015 Cash Bonus Plan, no payouts will be made unless our board of directors or the committee determines that there are other factors that merit consideration in the determination of bonus awards, which may be determined on an individual basis.

The portion of the 2015 Cash Bonus Plan incentives that relate to the product development milestones generally require that we obtain regulatory clearance or approval for certain products under development and commence commercial sales of those products within specified time periods. Subject to the committee’s final discretion, each of the product development milestones must be achieved within the required time period for the product development portion of the cash bonuses to be achieved. Overall goal achievement for product development milestones will be based on the portion of the product development milestones that we actually achieve during fiscal year 2015.

The portion of the cash bonuses that relate to the financial performance objectives may be earned based on our actual revenue for 2015 as compared to a pre-established 2015 revenue target, or Revenue Target, provided we also achieve at least a minimum operating margin percentage, which we refer to as a Minimum Operating Percentage Target.  Subject to the foregoing, the financial objective portion of the cash bonus that may be earned under the 2015 Cash Bonus Plan is determined as follows:  

If our actual revenues for 2015 are above 105% of the Revenue Target, and provided that we also achieve at least a secondary minimum operating margin percentage, then the 2015 Cash Bonus Plan has two levels of potential incremental overall goal achievement:

Equity-Based Awards

In keeping with our executive compensation philosophy, the committee believes that meaningful equity ownership is important to align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders and to provide our executives with incentives to create long-term value for our stockholders. The executives’ interests are aligned with stockholders because, as the value of the Company increases over time, the value of the executives’ equity grants increases as well. The committee also believes that granting equity awards that vest over time promotes the retention of our executives.

Prior to the completion of our initial public offering, our outstanding equity awards were principally granted pursuant to the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, or 2006 Plan. The 2006 Plan allowed for the issuance of equity awards to our officers, directors and employees in the form of stock options or restricted stock. Following the completion of our initial public offering, the committee and our board of directors has determined not to make any further awards under the 2006 Plan.

 

 

---

 

In connection with our initial public offering, our board of directors and stockholders approved the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan, or 2013 Plan. The 2013 Plan allows for the issuance of equity awards to our officers, directors and employees in the form of stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, or SARs, and restricted stock units, or RSUs.

When determining the number of equity awards to be granted to each executive, the committee generally considers several factors, including the position and level of responsibility of the executive, the executive’s tenure with us, and survey data with respect to the level of equity ownership by executives with similar titles and levels of responsibility at the surveyed companies. The committee also takes into account our achievement with respect to significant milestones during the period prior to the grant date, such as completing financing transactions and receiving regulatory clearance or approval to commercialize products.

We did not grant any equity awards to our named executive officers during 2014. We expect that future equity awards will be granted to our named executive officers and other employees pursuant to the 2013 Plan. For additional information, see “Executive Compensation—Stock Incentive Plans.”

Benefits

We have adopted a defined contribution 401(k) plan for the benefit of our employees. Employees are eligible to participate in the plan beginning on the first day of the calendar quarter following their date of hire. Under the terms of the plan, employees may make voluntary contributions as a percent of compensation. We do not match contributions at this time.

In June 2014 we adopted and approved the Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, or the Deferred Compensation Plan. The Deferred Compensation Plan is a nonqualified deferred compensation program that we sponsor to provide non-employee directors and certain of our management employees designated by our board of directors the opportunity to defer compensation under the Deferred Compensation Plan. The effective date for the Deferred Compensation Plan for the first year was July 1, 2014, and thereafter the plan year will be from January 1 to December 31. There is no limit to the amount that a participant may defer under the Deferred Compensation Plan whether in a particular plan year or in the aggregate. Our board of directors may also elect to make additional discretionary contributions to be credited to the account of any or all participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan; however, no such contributions have been made since the inception of the plan. All contributions by a participant, and any discretionary contributions that we make in the future, will be immediately fully vested. We established a trust for the purpose of reserving any benefits that may become payable under the Deferred Compensation Plan. Distributions from the Deferred Compensation Plan will be governed by the Internal Revenue Code and the terms of the plan.

We also offer a standard benefits package that we believe is necessary to attract and retain key executives. Our named executive officers are eligible to participate in our health and welfare benefit plans. We also pay the premiums for long-term disability insurance and life insurance for our named executive officers.

Hedging and Pledging Policy

Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits our employees, including our named executive officers, from engaging in transactions to “hedge” ownership of our stock, including short sales or trading in any derivatives involving our securities. We believe this policy is consistent with good corporate governance and with our pay-for-performance compensation model. Our policies also prohibit pledging of our common stock. There are no outstanding pledged shares.

Clawback Policy

In accordance with the provisions of Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, if we are required, as a result of misconduct, to restate our financial results due to our material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements under the federal securities laws, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer may be legally required to reimburse us for any bonus or other incentive-based or equity-based compensation they received as a result of the material noncompliance. In addition, we will comply with the requirements of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and will adopt a compensation recovery policy once the SEC adopts final regulations on the subject.

 

 

---

 

Tax and Accounting Considerations

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, the Code, generally provides that a publicly held company may not deduct compensation paid to certain of its top executive officers in excess of $1 million in a calendar year, unless such compensation qualified as “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. We are mindful of the benefit to us and our stockholders of the full deductibility of compensation and have taken steps so that both cash and equity awards that we grant may qualify for deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code. However, the committee retains the discretion to provide compensation that potentially may not be fully deductible to reward performance to enhance retention, or to otherwise further our compensation objectives, consistent with our compensation philosophies. In addition, awards we grant that are intended to qualify as performance-based awards may not necessarily qualify for such status under Section 162(m) of the Code.

The committee also considers the impact of Section 409A of the Code, and in general, our executive plans and programs are designed to comply with the requirements of that section so as to avoid possible adverse tax consequences that may result from non-compliance.

Employment Agreements

 

We have not entered into employment agreements with any of our executive officers.

Employment Severance Agreements

 

Our board of directors has approved employment severance agreements with each of our named executive officers, as well as with all of our other executive officers. Our board of directors believes it is important to provide our named executive officers with severance benefits under limited circumstances in order to provide them with enhanced financial security and sufficient incentive and encouragement to remain employed by us.

Pursuant to the terms of each of the severance agreements, if within three months prior or 12 months following a “change of control” (as defined in the severance agreements), the executive officer’s employment is terminated as a result of (i) an involuntary termination or (ii) a resignation for good reason (each as defined in the severance agreements), then the executive will continue to receive salary at the salary amount in effect at the time of such termination (less applicable withholdings and deductions) for the applicable severance period beginning immediately following such termination as well as the executive’s target bonus for the year in which the termination occurs. The executive will also vest in and have the right to exercise all outstanding options, restricted stock awards and stock appreciation rights, or SARs, that were unvested as of the date of such termination. Additionally, all of our repurchase rights with respect to any vested and unvested restricted stock will lapse and any right to repurchase any of our common stock shall terminate.

If within 12 months following a change of control, the executive officer’s employment is terminated as a result of voluntary resignation, termination for cause, disability or death, then the executive officer will not be entitled to receive severance change in control benefits except for those as may then be established under our then existing severance and benefits plans and practices or pursuant to other written agreements with us.

Pursuant to the terms of each of the severance agreements, upon the termination of the named executive officer’s employment for any reason, we will pay the executive:

The severance agreements are nearly identical for each of the named executive officers except that the severance period for Mr. Blickenstaff is 24 months and the severance period for each of Messrs. Anacone and Sheridan is 18 months.

The benefits payable under the severance agreements may be immediately terminated in certain circumstances, including the unauthorized use by a named executive officer of our material confidential information or any prohibited or unauthorized competitive activity undertaken by a named executive officer.

 

 

---

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table provides a summary of the compensation of our named executive officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

 

The following table summarizes the outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2014.

 

 

 

 

---

 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested at Fiscal Year End

 

The following table presents certain information concerning the exercise of options by our named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

 

Stock Incentive Plans

 

As of December 31, 2014, the number of shares reserved for issuance, number of shares issued, number of shares underlying outstanding stock options and number of shares remaining available for future issuance under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan is set forth in the table below. The table below also reflects the number of shares reserved for issuance and number of shares remaining available for future issuance under the 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The committee and our board of directors have determined not to make any further awards under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan.

 

2006 Stock Incentive Plan

The 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, or 2006 Plan, was approved by our board of directors in September 2006, was subsequently approved by our stockholders in July 2007 and was most recently amended in April 2013.

We have reserved an aggregate of 2,685,605 shares of our common stock for issuance under the 2006 Plan.

The 2006 Plan permits us to make grants of options to purchase common stock intended to qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Code, and options that do not so qualify, which are referred to as non-qualified stock options. Incentive stock options may only be issued to our employees. Non-qualified stock options may be issued to employees, officers, directors, consultants and other service providers. The option exercise price of each option granted pursuant to the 2006 Plan will be determined by the committee, and may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant, subject to certain exceptions. The term of each option will be fixed by the committee and may not exceed ten years from the date of grant. All option grants under the 2006 Plan are made pursuant to a written option agreement.

The 2006 Plan also permits us to make grants of restricted stock. Restricted stock awards may be issued to employees, officers, directors, consultants and other service providers. The purchase price for the restricted stock awards granted pursuant to the 2006 Plan will be determined by the committee, and may not be less than 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant, subject to certain exceptions. All restricted stock grants under the 2006 Plan are made pursuant to a written restricted stock agreement.

The 2006 Plan is administered by the committee. The committee has the authority to manage and control the administration of the 2006 Plan. In particular, the committee has the authority to determine the persons to whom awards are granted and the number of shares of common stock underlying each award. In addition, the committee has the authority to accelerate the exercisability or vesting of any award, and to determine the specific terms and conditions of each award. However, the committee typically recommends specific equity grants to each executive officer, which grants are then approved by our full board of directors.

 

 

---

 

With respect to options granted under the 2006 Plan, the committee may provide that, in the event of a “change in control,” vesting shall accelerate automatically effective as of immediately prior to the change in control. The committee has the discretion to provide other terms and conditions that relate to the vesting of options upon a change in control, or for the assumption of options in the event of a change in control. Outstanding options terminate upon a change in control except to the extent they are assumed in the change in control transaction. With respect to restricted stock granted under the 2006 Plan, in the event of a change in control, all repurchase rights automatically terminate immediately prior to the change in control, and the shares immediately vest in full, except to the extent that the acquiring entity provides for the assumption of the restricted stock award, or such accelerated vesting is precluded by other limitations imposed by the committee at the time the restricted stock is issued.

The committee may amend, suspend or terminate the 2006 Plan at any time, subject to compliance with applicable law. The committee may also amend, modify or terminate any outstanding award, provided that no amendment to an award may substantially affect or impair the rights of a participant under any awards previously granted without his or her written consent.

The committee and our board of directors have determined not to make any further awards under the 2006 Plan following the completion of our initial public offering.

2013 Stock Incentive Plan

Our board of directors and our stockholders has approved the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan, or 2013 Plan. The 2013 Plan provides us flexibility with respect to our ability to attract and retain the services of qualified employees, officers, directors, consultants and other service providers upon whose judgment, initiative and efforts the successful conduct and development of our business depends, and to provide additional incentives to such persons to devote their effort and skill to the advancement and betterment of our company, by providing them an opportunity to participate in the ownership of our company and thereby have an interest in its success and increased value.

We have reserved an aggregate of 4,809,000 shares of our common stock for issuance under the 2013 Plan. This number is subject to adjustment in the event of a recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reclassification, stock dividend or other change in our capital structure. To the extent that an award terminates, or expires for any reason, then any shares subject to the award may be used again for new grants. However, shares which are (i) not issued or delivered as a result of the net settlement of outstanding SARs, or options, (ii) used to pay the exercise price related to outstanding options, (iii) used to pay withholding taxes related to outstanding options or SARs or (iv) repurchased on the open market with the proceeds from an option exercise, will not be available for grant under the 2013 Plan.

The number of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance will automatically increase on January 1 of each calendar year, from January 1, 2015 through January 1, 2022, by the least of (i) 4% of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding on December 31 of the preceding calendar year, or (ii) a number determined by our board of directors that is less than (i).

The 2013 Plan permits us to make grants of (i) incentive stock options pursuant to Section 422 of the Code and (ii) non-qualified stock options. Incentive stock options may only be issued to our employees. Non-qualified stock options may be issued to our employees, directors, consultants and other service providers. The option exercise price of each option granted pursuant to the 2013 Plan will be determined by the committee and may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant, subject to certain exceptions. The term of each option will be fixed by the committee and may not exceed ten years from the date of grant. All option grants under the 2013 Plan are made pursuant to a written option agreement.

The 2013 Plan permits us to sell or make grants of restricted stock. Restricted stock may be sold or granted to our employees, directors, consultants and other service providers (or of any current or future parent or subsidiary of our company). Restricted stock issued under the 2013 Plan is sold or granted pursuant to a written restricted stock purchase agreement.

The 2013 Plan also permits us to issue SARs. SARs may be issued to our employees, directors, consultants and other service providers. The base price per share of common stock covered by each SAR may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant, subject to certain exceptions. SAR grants under the 2013 Plan are made pursuant to a written SAR agreement.

Further, the 2013 Plan permits us to issue RSUs. RSUs may be issued to our employees, directors, consultants and other service providers. RSU grants under the 2013 Plan are made pursuant to a written RSU agreement.

The 2013 Plan is administered by the committee, which has the authority to control and manage the operation and administration of the 2013 Plan. In particular, the committee has the authority to determine the persons to whom, and the time or times at which, incentive options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, SARs or RSUs shall be granted, the number of shares to be represented by each option agreement or covered by each restricted stock purchase agreement, SAR agreement or RSU agreement and the exercise price of such options and the base price of such SARs. In addition, the committee has the authority to accelerate the exercisability or vesting of any award, and to determine the specific terms, conditions and restrictions of each award.

 

 

---

 

Unless provided otherwise within each written option agreement, restricted stock purchase agreement, SAR agreement or RSU agreement as the case may be, the vesting of all options, restricted stock, SARs and RSUs granted under the 2013 Plan shall accelerate automatically in the event of a “change in control” (as defined in the 2013 Plan) effective as of immediately prior to the consummation of the change in control unless such equity awards are to be assumed by the acquiring or successor entity (or parent thereof) or equity awards of comparable value are to be issued in exchange therefor or the equity awards granted under the 2013 Plan are to be replaced by the acquiring entity with other incentives under a new incentive program containing such terms and provisions as the committee in its discretion may consider equitable.

Our board of directors may from time to time alter, amend, suspend or terminate the 2013 Plan in such respects as our board of directors may deem advisable, provided that no such alteration, amendment, suspension or termination shall be made which shall substantially affect or impair the rights of any participant under any awards previously granted without such participant’s consent.

No awards may be granted under the 2013 Plan after the date that is ten years from the date the 2013 Plan was approved by our stockholders.

2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Our board of directors and our stockholders have approved the 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP. The purpose of the ESPP is to retain the services of new employees and secure the services of new and existing employees while providing incentives for such individuals to exert maximum efforts toward our success.

The ESPP authorizes the issuance of shares of our common stock pursuant to purchase rights granted to our employees or to employees of any of our designated affiliates. We have reserved an aggregate of 785,256 shares of our common stock for issuance under the ESPP. This number is subject to adjustment in the event of a recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reclassification, stock dividend or other change in our capital structure.

The number of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance will automatically increase on January 1 of each calendar year, from January 1, 2014 through January 1, 2022, by the least of (i) 1% of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding on December 31 of the preceding calendar year, or (ii) a number determined by our board of directors that is less than (i). The ESPP is intended to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” within the meaning of Section 423 of the Code.

Our board of directors has delegated its authority to administer the ESPP to the committee. The ESPP is implemented through a series of offerings of purchase rights to eligible employees. Under the ESPP, we may specify offerings with duration of not more than 27 months, and may specify shorter purchase periods within each offering. Each offering will have one or more purchase dates on which shares of our common stock will be purchased for employees participating in the offering. An offering may be terminated under certain circumstances.

Generally, all regular employees, including executive officers, employed by us or by any of our designated affiliates, may participate in the ESPP and may contribute, normally through payroll deductions, up to 15% of their earnings for the purchase of our common stock under the ESPP. Unless otherwise determined by our board of directors, common stock will be purchased for accounts of employees participating in the ESPP at a price per share equal to the lower of (i) 85% of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the first date of an offering or (ii) 85% of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of purchase.

Employees may have to satisfy one or more service requirements before participating in the ESPP, as determined by our board of directors. No employee may purchase shares under the ESPP at a rate in excess of $25,000 worth of our common stock based on the fair market value per share of our common stock at the beginning of an offering for each year such a purchase right is outstanding. Finally, no employee will be eligible for the grant of any purchase rights under the ESPP if immediately after such rights are granted, such employee has voting power over 5% or more of our outstanding capital stock measured by vote or value pursuant to Section 424(d) of the Code.

In the event that there occurs a change in our capital structure through such actions as a stock split, merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, reincorporation, stock dividend, dividend in property other than cash, large nonrecurring cash dividend, liquidating dividend, combination of shares, exchange of shares, change in corporate structure or similar transaction, our board of directors will make appropriate adjustments to (i) the number of shares reserved under the ESPP, (ii) the maximum number of shares by which the share reserve may increase automatically each year and (iii) the number of shares and purchase price of all outstanding purchase rights.

In the event of certain significant corporate transactions, any then-outstanding rights to purchase our stock under the ESPP may be assumed, continued or substituted for by any surviving or acquiring entity (or its parent company). If the surviving or acquiring entity elects not to assume, continue or substitute for such purchase rights, then the participants’ accumulated payroll contributions will be used to purchase shares of our common stock within a specified period prior to such corporate transaction, and such purchase rights will terminate immediately. A corporate transaction generally has the same meaning as such term in the 2013 Plan.

Our board of directors has the authority to amend or terminate our ESPP, provided that except in certain circumstances any such amendment or termination may not materially impair any outstanding purchase rights without the holder’s consent. We will obtain stockholder approval of any amendment to our ESPP as required by applicable law or listing requirements.

 

 

---

 

Compensation Risk Assessment

 

We believe that, although a portion of the compensation provided to our executives and other employees is subject to the achievement of specified Company performance criteria, our executive compensation program does not encourage excessive or unnecessary risk-taking. We do not believe that our compensation programs are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

 

 

 

---

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The compensation committee of the board of directors of Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. has reviewed and discussed with management the Executive Compensation disclosure and related tables contained in this Proxy Statement. Based on our review and discussion, we have recommended to the board of directors that the Executive Compensation disclosure and related tables be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated into the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

The foregoing report has been furnished by the compensation committee.

Respectfully submitted,

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Douglas A. Roeder, Chairman

Dick P. Allen

Howard E. Greene, Jr.

This Compensation Committee Report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.

 

 

 

 

---

 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

There were no transactions or series of similar transactions since January 1, 2014, or any currently proposed transaction, to which we were or are a party in which:

Procedures for Approval of Related Party Transactions

 

Our board of directors has adopted a Related Party Transaction Policy to assist us in identifying, reviewing and approving related party transactions. Under our Related Party Transaction Policy, our Compliance Officer is charged with the primary responsibility for determining whether, based on the facts and circumstances, a related person has a direct or indirect material interest in a current or proposed transaction. To assist the Compliance Officer in making this determination, the policy sets forth certain categories of transactions that are deemed not to involve a direct or indirect material interest on behalf of the related person. If, after applying these categorical standards and weighing all of the facts and circumstances, the Compliance Officer determines that the related person would have a direct or indirect material interest in the transaction, the Compliance Officer must present the transaction to the audit committee for review or, if impracticable under the circumstances, to the Chair of the audit committee. The audit committee must then either approve or reject the transaction in accordance with the terms of the policy.

 

 

 

 

---

 

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of 10% or more of our common stock, or reporting persons, are required to report to the SEC on a timely basis the initiation of their status as a reporting person and any changes with respect to their beneficial ownership of our common stock. Based solely on our review of copies of such forms that we have received, or written representations from reporting persons, we believe that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, all executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders complied with all applicable SEC filing requirements, except that Dr. Cohen and Messrs. Cahill and Greene each filed one late Form 4 in connection with the automatic grant of a stock option under the terms of the 2013 Plan in November 2014.  

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Proposals of stockholders intended to be presented at our annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2016 must be received by us no later than December 11, 2015 in order to be included in our proxy statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting. These proposals must comply with the requirements as to form and substance established by the SEC for such proposals in order to be included in the proxy statement.

Under our amended and restated bylaws, a stockholder who wishes to make a proposal at the 2016 annual meeting without including the proposal in our proxy statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting must notify us no earlier than the close of business on January 21, 2016 and no later than the close of business on February 20, 2016. Our amended and restated bylaws specify certain requirements regarding the form and content of such a notice.

ANNUAL REPORT

A copy of our Annual Report has been posted on the Internet, along with this Proxy Statement, each of which is accessible by following the instructions in the Notice. Any person who was a beneficial owner of our common stock on the record date may request a copy of our Annual Report, and it will be furnished without charge upon receipt of a written request identifying the person so requesting an Annual Report as a stockholder of the Company at such date. Requests should be directed in writing to Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc., 11045 Roselle Street, San Diego, California 92121, Attention: General Counsel, or by telephone to (858) 366-6900.

 

 

 

 

---

 

STOCKHOLDERS SHARING THE SAME ADDRESS

SEC rules permit companies, brokers, banks or other agents to deliver a single copy of a proxy statement and annual report to households at which two or more stockholders reside. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce duplicate mailings and save significant printing and postage costs as well as natural resources. Stockholders sharing an address who have been previously notified by their broker, bank or other agent and have consented to householding will receive only one copy of our proxy statement and annual report.

If you would like to opt out of this practice for future mailings and receive separate proxy statements and annual reports for each stockholder sharing the same address, please contact your broker, bank or other agent. You may also obtain a separate proxy statement or annual report without charge by contacting us at Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc., 11045 Roselle Street, San Diego, California 92121, Attention: General Counsel; or by telephone to (858) 366-6900. We will promptly send additional copies of the proxy statement or annual report.

Stockholders sharing an address that are receiving multiple copies of the proxy statement or annual report can request delivery of a single copy of the proxy statement or annual report by contacting their broker, bank or other intermediary or by contacting us as indicated above.

OTHER MATTERS

We do not know of any business other than that described in this Proxy Statement that will be presented for consideration or action by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. If, however, any other business is properly brought before the Annual Meeting, shares represented by proxies will be voted in accordance with the best judgment of the persons named in the proxies or their substitutes.

By Order of the Board of Directors

 

Kim D. Blickenstaff

President and Chief Executive Officer

San Diego, California

April 9, 2015

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

0                     ¢

TANDEM DIABETES CARE, INC.

Proxy for Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 20, 2015

Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors

The undersigned hereby appoints Kim D. Blickenstaff and John Cajigas, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute, to represent and vote, as designated on the reverse side hereof, all the shares of common stock of Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. held of record by the undersigned at the close of business on March 27, 2015 at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 20, 2015 at 3:00 p.m. Pacific Time at 11045 Roselle St., San Diego, California 92121, and at any adjournment thereof.

(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side.)

 

 

 

---

 

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF

TANDEM DIABETES CARE, INC.

May 20, 2015

GO GREEN

 

NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS:

The Notice of Meeting, proxy statement and proxy card

are available at http://www.astproxyportal.com/ast/18636

Please sign, date and mail

your proxy card in the

envelope provided as soon

as possible.

i  Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided.  i