WFC-03.31.2015-10Q


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10‑Q
 
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015
 
Commission file number 001-2979
 
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
 
No. 41-0449260
(State of incorporation)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
420 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, California 94163
(Address of principal executive offices)  (Zip Code)
 
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  1-866-249-3302 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ
 
No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ
 
No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non‑accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
 
Large accelerated filer    þ
 
Accelerated filer  o
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non‑accelerated filer    o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company  o
 
          
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o
 
No þ
 
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
 
 
 
Shares Outstanding
 
 
April 30, 2015
Common stock, $1-2/3 par value
 
5,149,204,973
          




FORM 10-Q
 
CROSS-REFERENCE INDEX
 
PART I
Financial Information
  
Item 1.
Financial Statements
Page
  
Consolidated Statement of Income
  
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
  
Consolidated Balance Sheet
  
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
  
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
  
Notes to Financial Statements
  
  
1

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  
  
2

Business Combinations
  
3

Federal Funds Sold, Securities Purchased under Resale Agreements and Other Short-Term Investments  
  
4

Investment Securities
  
5

Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses
  
6

Other Assets
  
7

Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities
  
8

Mortgage Banking Activities
  
9

Intangible Assets
  
10

Guarantees, Pledged Assets and Collateral
  
11

Legal Actions
  
12

Derivatives
  
13

Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities
  
14

Preferred Stock
  
15

Employee Benefits
  
16

Earnings Per Common Share
  
17

Other Comprehensive Income
  
18

Operating Segments
  
19

Regulatory and Agency Capital Requirements
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Financial Review)
  
  
Summary Financial Data  
  
Overview
  
Earnings Performance
  
Balance Sheet Analysis
  
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements  
  
Risk Management
  
Capital Management
  
Regulatory Reform
  
Critical Accounting Policies  
  
Current Accounting Developments
  
Forward-Looking Statements  
  
Risk Factors 
  
Glossary of Acronyms
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
 
 
 
PART II
Other Information
  
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 6.
Exhibits
 
 
 
 
 
Signature
 
 
Exhibit Index

1



PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

FINANCIAL REVIEW

Summary Financial Data
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
% Change
 
 
Quarter ended
 
 
Mar 31, 2015 from
 
($ in millions, except per share amounts)
Mar 31,
2015

 
Dec 31,
2014

 
Mar 31,
2014

 
Dec 31,
2014

 
Mar 31,
2014

For the Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Wells Fargo net income
$
5,804

 
5,709

 
5,893

 
2
 %
 
(2
)
Wells Fargo net income applicable to common stock
5,461

 
5,382

 
5,607

 
1

 
(3
)
Diluted earnings per common share
1.04

 
1.02

 
1.05

 
2

 
(1
)
Profitability ratios (annualized):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Wells Fargo net income to average assets (ROA)
1.38
%
 
1.36

 
1.57

 
1

 
(12
)
Wells Fargo net income applicable to common stock to average Wells Fargo common stockholders' equity (ROE)
13.17

 
12.84

 
14.35

 
3

 
(8
)
Efficiency ratio (1)
58.8

 
59.0

 
57.9

 

 
2

Total revenue
21,278

 
21,443

 
20,625

 
(1
)
 
3

Pre-tax pre-provision profit (PTPP) (2)
8,771

 
8,796

 
8,677

 

 
1

Dividends declared per common share
0.35

 
0.35

 
0.30

 

 
17

Average common shares outstanding
5,160.4

 
5,192.5

 
5,262.8

 
(1
)
 
(2
)
Diluted average common shares outstanding
5,243.6

 
5,279.2

 
5,353.3

 
(1
)
 
(2
)
Average loans
$
863,261

 
849,429

 
823,790

 
2

 
5

Average assets
1,707,798

 
1,663,760

 
1,525,905

 
3

 
12

Average core deposits (3)
1,063,234

 
1,035,999

 
973,801

 
3

 
9

Average retail core deposits (4)
731,413

 
714,572

 
690,643

 
2

 
6

Net interest margin
2.95
%
 
3.04

 
3.20

 
(3
)
 
(8
)
At Period End
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment securities
$
324,736

 
312,925

 
270,327

 
4

 
20

Loans
861,231

 
862,551

 
826,443

 

 
4

Allowance for loan losses
12,176

 
12,319

 
13,695

 
(1
)
 
(11
)
Goodwill
25,705

 
25,705

 
25,637

 

 

Assets
1,737,737

 
1,687,155

 
1,546,707

 
3

 
12

Core deposits (3)
1,086,993

 
1,054,348

 
994,185

 
3

 
9

Wells Fargo stockholders' equity
188,796

 
184,394

 
175,654

 
2

 
7

Total equity
189,964

 
185,262

 
176,469

 
3

 
8

Tier 1 capital (5)
158,787

 
154,666

 
147,549

 
3

 
8

Total capital (5)
196,204

 
192,940

 
183,559

 
2

 
7

Capital ratios (5):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total equity to assets
10.93
%
 
10.98

 
11.41

 

 
(4
)
Risk-based capital:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tier 1 capital
12.20

 
12.45

 
12.63

 
(2
)
 
(3
)
Total capital
15.08

 
15.53

 
15.71

 
(3
)
 
(4
)
Tier 1 leverage
9.48

 
9.45

 
9.84

 

 
(4
)
Common Equity Tier 1
10.69

 
11.04

 
11.36

 
(3
)
 
(6
)
Common shares outstanding
5,162.9

 
5,170.3

 
5,265.7

 

 
(2
)
Book value per common share
$
32.70

 
32.19

 
30.48

 
2

 
7

Common stock price:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
High
56.29

 
55.95

 
49.97

 
1

 
13

Low
50.42

 
46.44

 
44.17

 
9

 
14

Period end
54.40

 
54.82

 
49.74

 
(1
)
 
9

Team members (active, full-time equivalent)
266,000

 
264,500

 
265,300

 
1

 

(1)
The efficiency ratio is noninterest expense divided by total revenue (net interest income and noninterest income).
(2)
Pre-tax pre-provision profit (PTPP) is total revenue less noninterest expense. Management believes that PTPP is a useful financial measure because it enables investors and others to assess the Company's ability to generate capital to cover credit losses through a credit cycle.
(3)
Core deposits are noninterest-bearing deposits, interest-bearing checking, savings certificates, certain market rate and other savings, and certain foreign deposits (Eurodollar sweep balances).
(4)
Retail core deposits are total core deposits excluding Wholesale Banking core deposits and retail mortgage escrow deposits.
(5)
See the "Capital Management" section and Note 19 (Regulatory and Agency Capital Requirements) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information.

2


This Quarterly Report, including the Financial Review and the Financial Statements and related Notes, contains forward-looking statements, which may include forecasts of our financial results and condition, expectations for our operations and business, and our assumptions for those forecasts and expectations. Do not unduly rely on forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from our forward-looking statements due to several factors. Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements are described in this Report, including in the “Forward-Looking Statements” section, and the “Risk Factors” and “Regulation and Supervision” sections of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (2014 Form 10-K).
 
When we refer to “Wells Fargo,” “the Company,” “we,” “our” or “us” in this Report, we mean Wells Fargo & Company and Subsidiaries (consolidated). When we refer to the “Parent,” we mean Wells Fargo & Company. See the Glossary of Acronyms for terms used throughout this Report.
 
Financial Review
 
Overview
Wells Fargo & Company is a nationwide, diversified, community-based financial services company with $1.7 trillion in assets. Founded in 1852 and headquartered in San Francisco, we provide banking, insurance, investments, mortgage, and consumer and commercial finance through more than 8,700 locations, 12,500 ATMs, the internet (wellsfargo.com) and mobile banking, and we have offices in 36 countries to support customers who conduct business in the global economy. With approximately 266,000 active, full-time equivalent team members, we serve one in three households in the United States and rank No. 29 on Fortune’s 2014 rankings of America’s largest corporations. We ranked fourth in assets and first in the market value of our common stock among all U.S. banks at March 31, 2015.
We use our Vision and Values to guide us toward growth and success. Our vision is to satisfy all our customers’ financial needs, help them succeed financially, be recognized as the premier financial services company in our markets and be one of America’s great companies. Important to our strategy to achieve this vision is to increase the number of our products our customers utilize and to offer them all of the financial products that fulfill their financial needs. We aspire to create deep and enduring relationships with our customers by discovering their needs and delivering the most relevant products, services, advice, and guidance.
We have six primary values, which are based on our vision and provide the foundation for everything we do. First, we value and support our people as a competitive advantage and strive to attract, develop, retain and motivate the most talented people we can find. Second, we strive for the highest ethical standards with our team members, our customers, our communities and our shareholders. Third, with respect to our customers, we strive to base our decisions and actions on what is right for them in everything we do. Fourth, for team members we strive to build and sustain a diverse and inclusive culture – one where they feel valued and respected for who they are as well as for the skills and experiences they bring to our company. Fifth, we also look to each of our team members to be leaders in establishing, sharing and communicating our vision. Sixth, we strive to make risk management a competitive advantage by working hard to ensure that appropriate controls are in place to reduce risks to our customers, maintain and increase our competitive market position, and protect Wells Fargo’s long-term safety, soundness and reputation.
 
Financial Performance
Wells Fargo net income was $5.8 billion in first quarter 2015 with diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $1.04, compared with $5.9 billion and $1.05, respectively, from a year ago. Our solid
 
earnings reflected the benefit of our diversified business model and our continued focus on serving the needs of our customers.
Compared with a year ago:
revenue grew 3% as a result of increases in both net interest income and noninterest income;
our loans increased $34.8 billion, or 4%, even with the planned runoff in our non-strategic/liquidating portfolios, and our core loan portfolio grew by $54.2 billion, or 7%; 
our liquidating portfolio declined $19.4 billion and was only 7% of our total loans, down from 9% a year ago;
our deposit franchise continued to generate strong customer and balance growth, with total deposits reaching a record $1.2 trillion, up $102.1 billion, or 9%, and we grew the number of primary consumer checking customers by 5.7%;
our credit performance continued to be very strong with total net charge-offs down $117 million, or 14%, and represented only 33 basis points (annualized) of average loans; and
we continued to maintain our solid customer relationships across our company, with Retail Banking cross-sell of 6.13 products per household (February 2015); Wholesale Banking cross-sell of 7.2 products (December 2014); and Wealth, Brokerage and Retirement cross-sell of 10.44 products (February 2015).
 
Balance Sheet and Liquidity
Our balance sheet continued to strengthen in first quarter 2015 as we increased our liquidity position, generated core loan and deposit growth, experienced continued improvement in credit quality and maintained strong capital levels. We have been able to grow our loans on a year-over-year basis for 15 consecutive quarters (for the past 12 quarters year-over-year loan growth has been 3% or greater) despite the planned runoff from our non-strategic/liquidating portfolios. Our non-strategic/liquidating loan portfolios decreased $2.2 billion during the quarter and our core loan portfolio increased $914 million. Our investment securities increased by $11.8 billion during the quarter, driven primarily by our purchases of U.S. Treasuries, federal agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and municipal securities.
Deposit growth remained strong with period-end deposits up $28.4 billion, or 2%, from December 31, 2014. This increase reflected solid growth across both our commercial and consumer businesses. Our average deposit cost was 9 basis points, consistent with fourth quarter 2014 and down 2 basis points from a year ago. We successfully grew our primary consumer checking customers by 5.7% and primary business checking customers by 5.5% from a year ago (February 2015 compared with February 2014). Our ability to consistently grow primary checking customers is important to our results because these customers have more interactions with us, have higher cross-sell and are more than twice as profitable as non-primary customers.
 


3

Overview (continued)

Credit Quality
Credit quality remained strong in first quarter 2015 as losses remained at historically low levels, nonperforming assets (NPAs) continued to decline, and we continued to originate high quality loans, reflecting our long-term risk focus. Net charge-offs were $708 million, or 0.33% (annualized) of average loans, in first quarter 2015, compared with $825 million a year ago (0.41%), a 14% year-over-year decrease in credit losses. Our commercial portfolio net charge-offs were $44 million, or 4 basis points of average commercial loans. Net consumer credit losses declined to 60 basis points in first quarter 2015 from 75 basis points in first quarter 2014. Our commercial real estate portfolios were in a net recovery position for the ninth consecutive quarter, reflecting our conservative risk discipline and improved market conditions. Losses on our consumer real estate portfolios declined $156 million from a year ago, down 43%, which included a $46 million decline in losses in our core 1-4 family first mortgage portfolio. The lower consumer loss levels reflected the benefit of the improving economy and our continued focus on originating high quality loans. Approximately 61% of the consumer first mortgage portfolio was originated after 2008, when more stringent underwriting standards were implemented.
Our provision for credit losses reflected a release from the allowance for credit losses of $100 million in first quarter 2015, which was $400 million less than what we released a year ago. Future allowance levels may increase or decrease based on a variety of factors, including loan growth, portfolio performance and general economic conditions.
In addition to lower net charge-offs and provision expense, NPAs also improved and were down $618 million, or 4%, from December 31, 2014, the tenth consecutive quarter of decline. Nonaccrual loans declined $338 million from the prior quarter while foreclosed assets were down $280 million.

 
Capital
Our financial performance in first quarter 2015 resulted in strong capital generation, which increased total equity to $190.0 billion at March 31, 2015, up $4.7 billion from the prior quarter. We continued to reduce our common share count through the repurchase of 48.4 million common shares in the quarter. We also entered into a $750 million forward repurchase contract in January 2015 with an unrelated third party that settled in April 2015 for 14.0 million shares. In addition, we entered into another $750 million forward repurchase contract with an unrelated third party in April 2015 that is expected to settle before August 2015 for approximately 14 million shares. We expect to reduce our common shares outstanding through share repurchases throughout the remainder of 2015. In March 2015, the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) announced no objection to our 2015 Capital Plan (the Plan) under the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) of the nation's largest banks. The Plan included a proposed increase to our quarterly dividend rate by 7% to $0.375 per common share for second quarter 2015, which was approved by our Board of Directors on April 28, 2015. This result again demonstrates the benefit of our diversified business model and conservative risk discipline, which have positioned us well to return more capital to shareholders while maintaining strong capital levels.
We believe an important measure of our capital strength is the estimated Common Equity Tier 1 ratio under Basel III, using the Advanced Approach, fully phased-in, which increased to 10.48% at March 31, 2015. 
Our regulatory capital ratios under Basel III (Standardized Approach with Transition Requirements) were strong with a total risk-based capital ratio of 15.08%, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 12.20% and Tier 1 leverage ratio of 9.48% at March 31, 2015. See the “Capital Management” section in this Report for more information regarding our capital, including the calculation of common equity for regulatory purposes.



4


Earnings Performance
Wells Fargo net income for first quarter 2015 was $5.8 billion ($1.04 diluted earnings per common share), compared with $5.9 billion ($1.05 diluted per share) for first quarter 2014. Our first quarter 2015 earnings reflected strong execution of our business strategy as we continued to satisfy our customers' financial needs. We generated diversified sources of revenue across many of our businesses and grew loans and deposits.
Revenue, the sum of net interest income and noninterest income, was $21.3 billion in first quarter 2015, compared with $20.6 billion in first quarter 2014. Our diversified sources of revenue generated by our businesses continued to be balanced between net interest income and noninterest income. The increase in revenue for first quarter 2015 compared with the same period in 2014 was primarily due to an increase in net interest income, reflecting increases in interest income from loans and trading assets. In first quarter 2015, net interest income of $11.0 billion represented 52% of revenue, compared with $10.6 billion (51%) in the same period in 2014.
Noninterest income was $10.3 billion in first quarter 2015, representing 48% of revenue, compared with $10.0 billion (49%) in first quarter 2014. The increase was driven predominantly by higher trust and investment fees and card fees, as well as net gains on debt securities, partially offset by lower net gains from equity investments.
Noninterest expense was $12.5 billion in first quarter 2015, compared with $11.9 billion in first quarter 2014. The increase in noninterest expense in first quarter 2015, compared with first quarter 2014, reflected higher personnel expense, including higher commission and incentive compensation. Noninterest expense as a percentage of revenue (efficiency ratio) was 58.8% in first quarter 2015 compared with 57.9% in first quarter 2014.

Net Interest Income
Net interest income is the interest earned on debt securities, loans (including yield-related loan fees) and other interest-earning assets minus the interest paid on deposits, short-term borrowings and long-term debt. The net interest margin is the average yield on earning assets minus the average interest rate paid for deposits and our other sources of funding. Net interest income and the net interest margin are presented on a taxable-equivalent basis in Table 1 to consistently reflect income from taxable and tax-exempt loans and securities based on a 35% federal statutory tax rate.
While the Company believes that it has the ability to increase net interest income over time, net interest income and the net interest margin in any one period can be significantly affected by a variety of factors including the mix and overall size of our earning assets portfolio and the cost of funding those assets. In addition, some sources of interest income, such as resolutions from purchased credit-impaired (PCI) loans, loan prepayment fees and collection of interest on nonaccrual loans, can vary from period to period. Net interest income growth has been challenged during the prolonged low interest rate environment as higher yielding loans and securities runoff have been replaced with lower yielding assets. The pace of this repricing has slowed in recent quarters.
 
Net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis was $11.2 billion in the first quarter of 2015, up from $10.8 billion for the same period a year ago. The net interest margin was 2.95% for the first quarter of 2015, down from 3.20% in the same period a year ago. The increase in net interest income in the first quarter of 2015 from the same period a year ago was largely driven by growth in earning assets, including growth in short-term investments, investment securities, commercial and industrial loans, and trading assets, which offset a decrease in earning asset yields. Lower funding expense, due to an increase in noninterest bearing funding sources and reduced deposit and long-term debt costs, also contributed to higher net interest income. The decline in net interest margin in first quarter of 2015, compared with the same period a year ago was primarily driven by higher funding balances, including customer-driven deposit growth and actions we took in 2014 in response to increased regulatory liquidity expectations which raised long- term debt and term deposits. This growth in funding increased cash and federal funds sold and other short-term investments which are dilutive to net interest margin although essentially neutral to net interest income.
Average earning assets increased $169.9 billion in first quarter 2015 from a year ago, as average investment securities increased $49.5 billion and average federal funds sold and other short-term investments increased $62.4 billion for the same period, respectively. In addition, average loans increased $39.5 billion in first quarter 2015, compared with the same period a year ago.
Core deposits are an important low-cost source of funding and affect both net interest income and the net interest margin. Core deposits include noninterest-bearing deposits, interest-bearing checking, savings certificates, market rate and other savings, and certain foreign deposits (Eurodollar sweep balances). Average core deposits rose to $1.1 trillion in first quarter 2015, compared with $973.8 billion in first quarter 2014, and funded 123% of average loans compared with 118% a year ago. Average core deposits decreased to 69% of average earning assets in first quarter 2015, compared with 71% a year ago. The cost of these deposits has continued to decline due to a sustained low interest rate environment and a shift in our deposit mix from higher cost certificates of deposit to lower yielding checking and savings products. About 97% of our average core deposits are in checking and savings deposits, one of the highest industry percentages.




5


Table 1:  Average Balances, Yields and Rates Paid (Taxable-Equivalent Basis) (1)(2)
  
Quarter ended March 31,
 
  
  
 
  
 
2015

 
  
 
  
 
2014

(in millions)
Average
balance

 
Yields/
rates

 
Interest
income/
expense

 
Average
balance

 
Yields/
rates

 
Interest
income/
expense

Earning assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal funds sold, securities purchased under
resale agreements and other short-term investments
$
275,731

 
0.28
%
 
$
190

 
213,284

 
0.27
%
 
$
144

Trading assets
62,977

 
2.88

 
453

 
48,231

 
3.17

 
381

Investment securities (3): 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Available-for-sale securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
26,163

 
1.55

 
100

 
6,572

 
1.68

 
28

Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
44,948

 
4.20

 
472

 
42,600

 
4.37

 
465

Mortgage-backed securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal agencies
102,193

 
2.76

 
706

 
117,641

 
2.94

 
864

Residential and commercial
23,938

 
5.71

 
342

 
28,035

 
6.12

 
429

Total mortgage-backed securities
126,131

 
3.32

 
1,048

 
145,676

 
3.55

 
1,293

Other debt and equity securities
47,051

 
3.43

 
400

 
49,156

 
3.59

 
438

Total available-for-sale securities
244,293

 
3.32

 
2,020

 
244,004

 
3.65

 
2,224

Held-to-maturity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
42,869

 
2.21

 
234

 
1,104

 
2.18

 
6

Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
1,948

 
5.16

 
25

 

 

 

Federal agency mortgage-backed securities
11,318

 
1.87

 
53

 
6,162

 
3.11

 
48

Other debt securities
6,792

 
1.72

 
29

 
6,414

 
1.86

 
29

Total held-to-maturity securities
62,927

 
2.19

 
341

 
13,680

 
2.45

 
83

Total investment securities
307,220

 
3.08

 
2,361

 
257,684

 
3.59

 
2,307

Mortgages held for sale (4)
19,583

 
3.61

 
177

 
16,556

 
4.11

 
170

Loans held for sale (4)
700

 
2.67

 
5

 
111

 
6.28

 
2

Loans:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Commercial:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Commercial and industrial - U.S.
227,682

 
3.28

 
1,844

 
193,865

 
3.43

 
1,641

Commercial and industrial - Non U.S.

45,062

 
1.88

 
209

 
42,181

 
1.92

 
200

Real estate mortgage
111,497

 
3.57

 
981

 
112,824

 
3.56

 
990

Real estate construction
19,492

 
3.52

 
169

 
17,071

 
4.38

 
184

Lease financing
12,319

 
4.95

 
152

 
12,262

 
6.12

 
188

Total commercial
416,052

 
3.26

 
3,355

 
378,203

 
3.43

 
3,203

Consumer:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
  
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
265,823

 
4.13

 
2,741

 
259,488

 
4.17

 
2,705

Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage
58,880

 
4.27

 
621

 
65,014

 
4.30

 
692

Credit card
30,380

 
11.78

 
883

 
26,283

 
12.32

 
798

Automobile
56,004

 
5.95

 
821

 
51,794

 
6.50

 
831

Other revolving credit and installment
36,122

 
6.01

 
535

 
43,008

 
5.00

 
531

Total consumer
447,209

 
5.05

 
5,601

 
445,587

 
5.02

 
5,557

Total loans (4)
863,261

 
4.19

 
8,956

 
823,790

 
4.29

 
8,760

Other
4,730

 
5.41

 
63

 
4,655

 
5.72

 
66

Total earning assets
$
1,534,202

 
3.21
%
 
$
12,205

 
1,364,311

 
3.49
%
 
$
11,830

Funding sources
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Interest-bearing checking
$
39,155

 
0.05
%
 
$
5

 
36,799

 
0.07
%
 
$
6

Market rate and other savings
613,413

 
0.06

 
97

 
579,044

 
0.07

 
105

Savings certificates
34,608

 
0.75

 
64

 
40,535

 
0.89

 
89

Other time deposits
56,549

 
0.39

 
56

 
45,822

 
0.42

 
48

Deposits in foreign offices
105,537

 
0.14

 
36

 
91,050

 
0.14

 
31

Total interest-bearing deposits
849,262

 
0.12

 
258

 
793,250

 
0.14

 
279

Short-term borrowings
71,712

 
0.11

 
18

 
54,502

 
0.09

 
13

Long-term debt
183,763

 
1.32

 
604

 
153,793

 
1.62

 
619

Other liabilities
16,894

 
2.30

 
97

 
12,859

 
2.72

 
87

Total interest-bearing liabilities
1,121,631

 
0.35

 
977

 
1,014,404

 
0.40

 
998

Portion of noninterest-bearing funding sources
412,571

 


 

 
349,907

 

 

Total funding sources
$
1,534,202

 
0.26

 
977

 
1,364,311

 
0.29

 
998

Net interest margin and net interest income on
a taxable-equivalent basis (5)
 
 
2.95
%
 
$
11,228

 
 
 
3.20
%
 
$
10,832

Noninterest-earning assets
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Cash and due from banks
$
17,059

 
  
 
  
 
16,363

 
  
 
  
Goodwill
25,705

 
  
 
  
 
25,637

 
  
 
  
Other
130,832

 
 
 
 
 
119,594

 
 
 
 
Total noninterest-earning assets
$
173,596

 
 
 
 
 
161,594

 
 
 
 
Noninterest-bearing funding sources
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
Deposits
$
325,531

 
 
 
 
 
284,069

 
 
 
 
Other liabilities
71,988

 
 
 
 
 
52,955

 
 
 
 
Total equity
188,648

 
 
 
 
 
174,477

 
 
 
 
Noninterest-bearing funding sources used to fund earning assets
(412,571
)
 
 
 
 
 
(349,907
)
 
 
 
 
Net noninterest-bearing funding sources
$
173,596

 
 
 
 
 
161,594

 
 
 
 
Total assets
$
1,707,798

 
 
 
 
 
1,525,905

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Our average prime rate was 3.25% for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. The average three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) was 0.26% and 0.24% for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
(2)
Yield/rates and amounts include the effects of hedge and risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.
(3)
Yields and rates are based on interest income/expense amounts for the period, annualized based on the accrual basis for the respective accounts. The average balance amounts represent amortized cost for the periods presented.
(4)
Nonaccrual loans and related income are included in their respective loan categories.
(5)
Includes taxable-equivalent adjustments of $242 million and $217 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, primarily related to tax-exempt income on certain loans and securities. The federal statutory tax rate utilized was 35% for the periods presented.

6

Earnings Performance (continued)

Noninterest Income
 
 
Table 2:  Noninterest Income
 
 
 
 
Quarter ended Mar 31,
 
 
 
(in millions)
 
2015

 
2014

 
% Change

Service charges on deposit accounts
 
$
1,215

 
1,215

 
 %
Trust and investment fees:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Brokerage advisory, commissions and other fees
 
2,380

 
2,241

 
6

Trust and investment management
 
852

 
844

 
1

Investment banking
 
445

 
327

 
36

Total trust and investment fees
 
3,677

 
3,412

 
8

Card fees
 
871

 
784

 
11

Other fees:
 
 
 
 
 

Charges and fees on loans
 
309

 
367

 
(16
)
Merchant processing fees
 
187

 
172

 
9

Cash network fees
 
125

 
120

 
4

Commercial real estate brokerage commissions
 
129

 
72

 
79

Letters of credit fees
 
88

 
96

 
(8
)
All other fees
 
240

 
220

 
9

Total other fees
 
1,078


1,047

 
3

Mortgage banking:
 
 
 
 
 

Servicing income, net
 
523

 
938

 
(44
)
Net gains on mortgage loan origination/sales activities
 
1,024

 
572

 
79

Total mortgage banking
 
1,547


1,510

 
2

Insurance
 
430

 
432

 

Net gains from trading activities
 
408

 
432

 
(6
)
Net gains on debt securities
 
278

 
83

 
235

Net gains from equity investments
 
370

 
847

 
(56
)
Lease income
 
132

 
133

 
(1
)
Life insurance investment income
 
145

 
132

 
10

All other
 
141

 
(17
)
 
NM

Total
 
$
10,292


10,010

 
3

NM - Not meaningful

Noninterest income of $10.3 billion represented 48% of revenue for first quarter 2015, compared with $10.0 billion, or 49% for first quarter 2014. The increase in noninterest income reflected growth in many of our businesses, including credit and debit cards, commercial banking, commercial real estate, corporate banking, investment banking, principal investments, asset-backed finance, real estate capital markets, wealth management and retail brokerage.
Service charges on deposit accounts was $1.2 billion in first quarter 2015, unchanged from first quarter 2014. Lower overdraft fees driven by changes implemented in early October 2014 designed to provide customers with more real time information were offset by higher fees from new commercial product sales and commercial product re-pricing.
Brokerage advisory, commissions and other fees are received for providing services to full-service and discount brokerage customers. Income from these brokerage-related activities include asset-based fees, which are based on the market value of the customer’s assets, and transactional commissions based on the number and size of transactions executed at the customer’s direction. These fees increased to $2.4 billion in first quarter 2015 from $2.2 billion for the same period in 2014. The increase in brokerage income was predominantly due to higher asset-based fees as a result of higher market values and growth in assets under management. Retail brokerage client assets totaled $1.44 trillion at March 31, 2015, up 4% from $1.38 trillion at March 31, 2014.
 
We earn trust and investment management fees from managing and administering assets, including mutual funds, corporate trust, personal trust, employee benefit trust and agency assets. Trust and investment management fees are largely based on a tiered scale relative to the market value of the assets under management or administration. These fees increased to $852 million in first quarter 2015 from $844 million for the same period in 2014, with growth primarily due to higher market values. At March 31, 2015, these assets totaled $2.5 trillion, an increase from $2.4 trillion at March 31, 2014.
We earn investment banking fees from underwriting debt and equity securities, arranging loan syndications, and performing other related advisory services. Investment banking fees increased to $445 million in first quarter 2015 from $327 million for the same period in 2014, driven by advisory services and broad based equity and debt origination performance in an active domestic market.
Card fees were $871 million in first quarter 2015, compared with $784 million from the same period a year ago. The increase was primarily due to account growth and increased purchase activity.
Other fees of $1.1 billion in first quarter 2015 increased $31 million compared with the same period a year ago as increases in commercial real estate brokerage commissions and merchant processing fees more than offset a decline in charges and fees on loans. Charges and fees on loans decreased to $309 million in first quarter 2015 compared with $367 million


7


for the same period a year ago primarily due to the phase out of the direct deposit advance product during the first half of 2014. Commercial real estate brokerage commissions increased by $57 million in first quarter 2015 compared with the same period a year ago, driven by increased sales and other property-related activities including financing and advisory services.
Mortgage banking noninterest income, consisting of net servicing income and net gains on loan origination/sales activities, totaled $1.5 billion in first quarter 2015, unchanged from first quarter 2014.
In addition to servicing fees, net mortgage loan servicing income includes amortization of commercial mortgage servicing rights (MSRs), changes in the fair value of residential MSRs during the period, as well as changes in the value of derivatives (economic hedges) used to hedge the residential MSRs. Net servicing income for first quarter 2015 included a $108 million net MSR valuation gain ($773 million decrease in the fair value of the MSRs and a $881 million hedge gain) and for first quarter 2014 included a $407 million net MSR valuation gain ($441 million decrease in the fair value of the MSRs offset by an $848 million hedge gain). The decrease in net MSR valuation gains in first quarter 2015, compared with the same period in 2014, was primarily attributable to MSR valuation adjustments in first quarter 2015 that reflected higher prepayment expectations due to the reduction in FHA mortgage insurance premiums as well as overall lower actual prepayments in first quarter of 2014.
Our portfolio of residential and commercial loans serviced for others was $1.84 trillion at March 31, 2015, and $1.86 trillion at December 31, 2014. At March 31, 2015, the ratio of combined residential and commercial MSRs to related loans serviced for others was 0.71%, compared with 0.75% at December 31, 2014. See the “Risk Management – Mortgage Banking Interest Rate and Market Risk” section of this Report for additional information regarding our MSRs risks and hedging approach.
Net gains on mortgage loan origination/sale activities were $1.0 billion in first quarter 2015, up from $572 million for the same period a year ago. The increase in first quarter 2015, compared with the same period a year ago, was primarily driven by increased origination volumes and margins. Mortgage loan originations were $49.0 billion for first quarter 2015, of which 45% were for home purchases, compared with $36 billion and 66% for the same period a year ago. The year-over-year increase was primarily driven by lower mortgage interest rates. Mortgage applications were $93 billion in first quarter 2015 compared with $60 billion for the same period a year ago. The real estate 1-4 family first mortgage unclosed pipeline was $44 billion at March 31, 2015, its highest level since June 30, 2013, compared with $27 billion at March 31, 2014. For additional information about our mortgage banking activities and results, see the “Risk Management – Mortgage Banking Interest Rate and Market Risk” section and Note 8 (Mortgage Banking Activities) and Note 13 (Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Net gains on mortgage loan origination/sales activities include adjustments to the mortgage repurchase liability. Mortgage loans are repurchased from third parties based on standard representations and warranties, and early payment default clauses in mortgage sale contracts. For the first quarter of 2015, we released a net $16 million from the repurchase liability, compared with a provision of $6 million for the first quarter of 2014. For additional information about mortgage loan repurchases, see the “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management – Liability for Mortgage Loan Repurchase Losses” section and Note 8 (Mortgage Banking Activities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
 
We engage in trading activities primarily to accommodate the investment activities of our customers, execute economic hedging to manage certain of our balance sheet risks and for a very limited amount of proprietary trading for our own account. Net gains from trading activities, which reflect unrealized changes in fair value of our trading positions and realized gains and losses, were $408 million in first quarter 2015 compared with $432 million for the same period a year ago. The first quarter year-over-year decrease was primarily driven by lower customer accommodation trading within our capital markets business partly offset by higher deferred compensation gains (offset in employee benefits expense).
Net gains from trading activities do not include interest and dividend income and expense on trading securities. Those amounts are reported within interest income from trading assets and other interest expense from trading liabilities. Interest and fees related to proprietary trading are reported in their corresponding income statement line items. Proprietary trading activities are not significant to our client-focused business model. For additional information about proprietary and other trading, see the “Risk Management – Asset and Liability Management – Market Risk – Trading Activities” section in this Report. 
Net gains on debt and equity securities totaled $648 million for first quarter 2015 and $930 million for first quarter 2014, net of other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) write-downs of $73 million and $135 million for first quarter 2015 and 2014, respectively. The decrease in net gains on debt and equity securities was primarily due to lower net gains from equity investments as our portfolio benefited from strong public and private equity markets in first quarter 2014.
All other income was $141 million in first quarter 2015, compared with $(17) million for the same period a year ago. All other income includes ineffectiveness recognized on derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting, losses on low income housing tax credit investments, foreign currency adjustments, and income from investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting, any of which can cause decreases and net losses in other income. Higher other income for first quarter 2015, compared with the same period a year ago, reflected higher income from equity method investments and larger ineffectiveness gains on derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting.



8

Earnings Performance (continued)

Noninterest Expense
 
 
 
 
 
Table 3:  Noninterest Expense
 
Quarter ended Mar 31,
 
 
 
(in millions)
2015

 
2014

 
% Change

Salaries
$
3,851

 
3,728

 
3
 %
Commission and incentive compensation
2,685

 
2,416

 
11

Employee benefits
1,477

 
1,372

 
8

Equipment
494

 
490

 
1

Net occupancy
723

 
742

 
(3
)
Core deposit and other intangibles
312

 
341

 
(9
)
FDIC and other deposit assessments
248

 
243

 
2

Outside professional services
548

 
559

 
(2
)
Operating losses
295

 
159

 
86

Outside data processing
253

 
241

 
5

Contract services
225

 
234

 
(4
)
Travel and entertainment
158

 
219

 
(28
)
Postage, stationery and supplies
171

 
191

 
(11
)
Advertising and promotion
118

 
118

 

Foreclosed assets
135

 
132

 
2

Telecommunications
111

 
114

 
(2
)
Insurance
140

 
125

 
12

Operating leases
62

 
50

 
25

All other
501

 
474

 
6

Total
$
12,507

 
11,948

 
5


Noninterest expense was $12.5 billion in first quarter 2015, up 5% from $11.9 billion in the same period a year ago, driven predominantly by higher personnel expenses ($8.0 billion, up from $7.5 billion a year ago) and higher operating losses ($295 million, up from $159 million a year ago). These increases were partially offset by lower travel and entertainment expense ($158 million, down from $219 million a year ago).
Personnel expenses, which include salaries, commissions, incentive compensation and employee benefits, were up $497 million, or 7%, in first quarter 2015 compared with the same quarter last year, largely due to higher revenue-related compensation, annual salary increases, higher deferred compensation (offset in trading income) and other benefits.
Operating losses were up $136 million, or 86%, in first quarter 2015 compared with the same period a year ago, primarily reflecting higher litigation accruals.
 
Travel and entertainment expenses were down $61 million, or 28%, in first quarter 2015 compared with the same period in 2014, primarily driven by travel expense reduction initiatives.
The efficiency ratio was 58.8% in first quarter 2015, compared with 57.9% in first quarter 2014. The Company expects to operate within its targeted efficiency ratio range of 55 to 59% for full year 2015.

Income Tax Expense
Our effective tax rate was 28.2% and 27.9% for first quarter 2015 and 2014, respectively. The effective tax rates for first quarter 2015 and 2014 reflected $359 million and $423 million, respectively, of discrete tax benefits primarily from reductions in reserves for uncertain tax positions due to audit resolutions of prior period matters with U.S. federal and state taxing authorities. Absent additional discrete tax benefits in 2015, we expect the effective income tax rate for full year 2015 to be higher than the effective tax rate for first quarter 2015.



9


Operating Segment Results
We are organized for management reporting purposes into three operating segments: Community Banking; Wholesale Banking; and Wealth, Brokerage and Retirement. These segments are defined by product type and customer segment and their results are based on our management accounting process, for which there is no comprehensive, authoritative financial accounting
 
guidance equivalent to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Table 4 and the following discussion present our results by operating segment. For additional description of our operating segments, including additional financial information and the underlying management accounting process, see Note 18 (Operating Segments) to Financial Statements in this Report.
 


Table 4:  Operating Segment Results – Highlights
(income/expense in millions,
 
Community Banking
 
 
Wholesale Banking
 
 
Wealth, Brokerage
and Retirement
 
 
Other (1)
 
 
Consolidated
Company
 
average balances in billions)
 
2015

 
2014

 
2015

 
2014

 
2015

 
2014

 
2015

 
2014

 
2015

 
2014

Quarter ended March 31,
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
 
$
12,784

 
12,593

 
5,912

 
5,580

 
3,733

 
3,468

 
(1,151
)
 
(1,016
)
 
21,278

 
20,625

Provision (reversal of provision) for credit losses
 
617

 
419

 
(6
)
 
(93
)
 
(3
)
 
(8
)
 

 
7

 
608

 
325

Noninterest expense
 
7,064

 
6,774

 
3,409

 
3,215

 
2,831

 
2,711

 
(797
)
 
(752
)
 
12,507

 
11,948

Net income (loss)
 
3,665

 
3,844

 
1,797

 
1,742

 
561

 
475

 
(219
)
 
(168
)
 
5,804

 
5,893

Average loans
 
$
506.4

 
505.0

 
337.6

 
301.9

 
56.9

 
50.0

 
(37.6
)
 
(33.1
)
 
863.3

 
823.8

Average core deposits
 
668.9

 
626.5

 
303.4

 
259.0

 
161.4

 
156.0

 
(70.5
)
 
(67.7
)
 
1,063.2

 
973.8

(1)
Includes corporate items not specific to a business segment and the elimination of certain items that are included in more than one business segment, substantially all of which represents products and services for wealth management customers provided in Community Banking stores.

Cross-sell Our cross-sell strategy is to increase the number of products our customers use by offering them all of the financial products that satisfy their financial needs. We track our cross-sell activities based on whether the customer is a retail banking household or has a wholesale banking relationship. For additional information regarding our cross-sell metrics, see the "Earnings Performance – Operating Segments – Cross-sell" section in our 2014 Form 10-K.

 
Operating Segment Results
The following discussion provides a description of each of our operating segments, including cross-sell metrics and financial results.

Community Banking offers a complete line of diversified financial products and services for consumers and small businesses including checking and savings accounts, credit and debit cards, and auto, student, and small business lending. These products also include investment, insurance and trust services in 39 states and D.C., and mortgage and home equity loans in all 50 states and D.C. through its Regional Banking and Wells Fargo Home Lending business units. The Community Banking segment also includes the results of our Corporate Treasury activities net of allocations in support of the other operating segments and results of investments in our affiliated venture capital partnerships. Our retail banking household cross-sell was 6.13 products per household in February 2015, compared with 6.17 in February 2014. The February 2015 retail banking household cross-sell ratio includes the impact of the sale of government guaranteed student loans in fourth quarter 2014. Our goal of eight products per retail banking household equates to approximately one-half of our estimate of potential demand for an average U.S. household. We believe there is continued opportunity to earn more business from our customers as we build lifelong relationships with them. Our approach is needs-based – some customers will benefit from more than eight products, some may need less, but on average our goal is to have eight products per retail banking household. In February 2015, one of every four of our retail banking households had eight or more of our products. Table 4a provides additional financial information for Community Banking.


10

Earnings Performance (continued)

Table 4a - Community Banking
 
 
 
 
 
 
Quarter ended March 31,
 
 
 
(in millions, except average balances which are in billions)
2015

 
2014

 
% Change

Net interest income
$
7,561

 
7,275

 
4
 %
Noninterest income:
 
 
 
 
 
Service charges on deposit accounts
772

 
817

 
(6
)
Trust and investment fees:
 
 
 
 

Brokerage advisory, commissions and other fees
506

 
433

 
17

Trust and investment management
214

 
199

 
8

Investment banking (1)
(36
)
 
(7
)
 
414

Total trust and investment fees
684

 
625

 
9

Card fees
802

 
721

 
11

Other fees
551

 
593

 
(7
)
Mortgage banking
1,435

 
1,424

 
1

Insurance
31

 
32

 
(3
)
Net gains from trading activities
83

 
36

 
131

Net gains on debt securities
206

 
10

 
NM

Net gains from equity investments (2)
290

 
755

 
(62
)
Other income of the segment
369

 
305

 
21

Total noninterest income
5,223

 
5,318

 
(2
)
 
 
 
 
 

Total revenue
12,784

 
12,593

 
2

 
 
 
 
 

Provision for credit losses
617

 
419

 
47

Noninterest expense:
 
 
 
 

Personnel expense
4,548

 
4,259

 
7

Equipment
436

 
420

 
4

Net occupancy
534

 
555

 
(4
)
Core deposit and other intangibles
146

 
158

 
(8
)
FDIC and other deposit assessments
147

 
152

 
(3
)
Outside professional services
207

 
224

 
(8
)
Operating losses
230

 
119

 
93

Other expense of the segment
816

 
887

 
(8
)
Total noninterest expense
7,064

 
6,774

 
4

Income before income tax expense and noncontrolling interests
5,103

 
5,400

 
(6
)
Income tax expense
1,364

 
1,376

 
(1
)
Net income from noncontrolling interests (3)
74

 
180

 
(59
)
Net income
$
3,665

 
3,844

 
(5
)
Average loans
$
506.4

 
505.0

 

Average core deposits
668.9

 
626.5

 
7

NM - Not meaningful
(1)
Represents syndication and underwriting fees paid to Wells Fargo Securities which are offset in our Wholesale Banking segment.
(2)
Predominantly represents gains resulting from venture capital investments.
(3)
Reflects results attributable to noncontrolling interests primarily associated with the Company’s consolidated merchant services joint venture and venture capital investments.

Community Banking reported net income of $3.7 billion in first quarter 2015, down $179 million, or 5%, from first quarter 2014. Revenue of $12.8 billion increased $191 million, or 2%, from a year ago primarily due to higher net interest income, gains on sale of debt securities, and higher card fees and trust and investment fees, partially offset by lower gains on equity investments and lower service charges on deposit accounts. Average core deposits increased $42.4 billion, or 7%, from first quarter 2014. Primary consumer checking customers as of February 2015 (customers who actively use their checking account with transactions such as debit card purchases, online bill payments, and direct deposit) were up 5.7% from February 2014. Noninterest expense increased $290 million, or 4%, from first quarter 2014, driven by higher personnel expenses and operating losses, partially offset by lower travel, occupancy, and
 
other expenses. Net charge-offs decreased $172 million from first quarter 2014 primarily due to credit improvement in consumer real estate loan portfolios. The provision for credit losses was $198 million higher than first quarter 2014 as the improvement in net charge-offs was more than offset by a lower allowance release.

Wholesale Banking provides financial solutions to businesses across the United States and globally with annual sales generally in excess of $20 million. Products and business segments include Middle Market Commercial Banking, Government and Institutional Banking, Corporate Banking, Commercial Real Estate, Treasury Management, Wells Fargo Capital Finance, Insurance, International, Real Estate Capital Markets, Commercial Mortgage Servicing, Corporate Trust, Equipment


11


Finance, Wells Fargo Securities, Principal Investments, Asset Backed Finance, and Asset Management. Wholesale Banking cross-sell was 7.2 products per relationship in first quarter 2015, consistent with the first quarter of 2014. Table 4b provides additional financial information for Wholesale Banking.
 


Table 4b - Wholesale Banking
 
 
 
 
 
 
Quarter ended March 31,
 
 
 
(in millions, except average balances which are in billions)
2015

 
2014

 
% Change

Net interest income
$
2,921

 
2,891

 
1
 %
Noninterest income:
 
 
 
 
 
Service charges on deposit accounts
443

 
398

 
11

Trust and investment fees:
 
 
 
 

Brokerage advisory, commissions and other fees
85

 
76

 
12

Trust and investment management
453

 
460

 
(2
)
Investment banking
484

 
337

 
44

Total trust and investment fees
1,022

 
873

 
17

Card fees
69

 
62

 
11

Other fees
526

 
453

 
16

Mortgage banking
113

 
86

 
31

Insurance
344

 
361

 
(5
)
Net gains from trading activities
283

 
360

 
(21
)
Net gains on debt securities
61

 
69

 
(12
)
Net gains from equity investments
77

 
88

 
(13
)
Other income of the segment
53

 
(61
)
 
NM

Total noninterest income
2,991

 
2,689

 
11

 
 
 
 
 

Total revenue
5,912

 
5,580

 
6

 
 
 
 
 

Reversal of provision for credit losses
(6
)
 
(93
)
 
(94
)
Noninterest expense:
 
 
 
 

Personnel expense
1,951

 
1,790

 
9

Equipment
47

 
60

 
(22
)
Net occupancy
113

 
111

 
2

Core deposit and other intangibles
85

 
96

 
(11
)
FDIC and other deposit assessments
79

 
70

 
13

Outside professional services
236

 
243

 
(3
)
Operating losses
37

 
19

 
95

Other expense of the segment
861

 
826

 
4

Total noninterest expense
3,409

 
3,215

 
6

Income before income tax expense and noncontrolling interests
2,509

 
2,458

 
2

Income tax expense
706

 
714

 
(1
)
Net income from noncontrolling interests
6

 
2

 
200

Net income
$
1,797

 
1,742

 
3

Average loans
$
337.6

 
301.9

 
12

Average core deposits
303.4

 
259.0

 
17

NM - Not meaningful

Wholesale Banking reported net income of $1.8 billion, up $55 million, or 3%, from first quarter 2014 driven by revenue growth. Revenue grew $332 million, or 6%, from first quarter 2014 on both increased net interest income and noninterest income. Net interest income increased $30 million, or 1%, driven by loan and other earning asset growth. Noninterest income increased $302 million, or 11%, on increased investment banking, commercial real estate brokerage, treasury management, foreign exchange and loan fees, and improved mortgage banking activity and earnings on nonmarketable equity investments. Average loans of $337.6 billion increased $35.7 billion, or 12%, from first quarter 2014, driven by growth in asset backed finance, capital
 
finance, commercial banking, commercial real estate, corporate banking, equipment finance, government and institutional banking and real estate capital markets. Average core deposits of $303.4 billion increased $44.4 billion, or 17%, from first quarter 2014 reflecting continued strong customer liquidity. Noninterest expense increased $194 million, or 6%, from first quarter 2014 due primarily to higher personnel expenses related to growth initiatives, compliance, and regulatory requirements. The provision for credit losses increased $87 million from first quarter 2014 due primarily to lower recoveries.


12

Earnings Performance (continued)

Wealth, Brokerage and Retirement provides a full range of financial advisory services to clients using a planning approach to meet each client's financial needs. Wealth Management provides affluent and high net worth clients with a complete range of wealth management solutions, including financial planning, private banking, credit, investment management and fiduciary services. Abbot Downing, a Wells Fargo business, provides comprehensive wealth management services to ultra-high net worth families and individuals as well as endowments and foundations. Brokerage serves customers' advisory, brokerage and financial needs as part of one of the largest full-service
 
brokerage firms in the United States. Retirement is a national leader in providing retirement and trust services (including 401(k) and pension plan record keeping) for institutional clients and reinsurance services for the life insurance industry. Wealth, Brokerage and Retirement cross-sell was 10.44 products per retail banking household in February 2015, up from 10.42 a year ago. Table 4c provides additional financial information for Wealth, Brokerage and Retirement.



Table 4c - Wealth, Brokerage and Retirement
 
 
 
 
 
 
Quarter ended March 31,
 
 
 
(in millions, except average balances which are in billions)
2015

 
2014

 
% Change

Net interest income
$
861

 
768

 
12
 %
Noninterest income:
 
 
 
 
 
Service charges on deposit accounts
4

 
4

 

Trust and investment fees:
 
 
 
 
 
Brokerage advisory, commissions and other fees
2,294

 
2,164

 
6

Trust and investment management
407

 
392

 
4

Investment banking (1)
(3
)
 
(3
)
 

Total trust and investment fees
2,698

 
2,553

 
6

Card fees
1

 
1

 

Other fees
4

 
4

 

Mortgage banking
(2
)
 
(1
)
 
100

Insurance
55

 
39

 
41

Net gains from trading activities
42

 
36

 
17

Net gains on debt securities
11

 
4

 
175

Net gains from equity investments
3

 
4

 
(25
)
Other income of the segment
56

 
56

 

Total noninterest income
2,872

 
2,700

 
6

 
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenue
3,733

 
3,468

 
8

 
 
 
 
 
 
Reversal of provision for credit losses
(3
)
 
(8
)
 
(63
)
Noninterest expense:
 
 
 
 
 
Personnel expense
1,932

 
1,847

 
5

Equipment
12

 
11

 
9

Net occupancy
105

 
103

 
2

Core deposit and other intangibles
81

 
87

 
(7
)
FDIC and other deposit assessments
37

 
35

 
6

Outside professional services
112

 
100

 
12

Operating losses
30

 
24

 
25

Other expense of the segment
522

 
504

 
4

Total noninterest expense
2,831

 
2,711

 
4

Income before income tax expense and noncontrolling interests
905

 
765

 
18

Income tax expense
344

 
290

 
19

Net income from noncontrolling interests

 

 

Net income
$
561

 
475

 
18

Average loans
$
56.9

 
50.0

 
14

Average core deposits
161.4

 
156.0

 
3

(1)
Represents syndication and underwriting fees paid to Wells Fargo Securities which are offset in our Wholesale Banking segment.

Wealth, Brokerage and Retirement reported net income of $561 million in first quarter 2015, up 18% from first quarter 2014 driven by higher net interest income and noninterest income. Revenue of $3.7 billion in first quarter 2015 was up 8% from first quarter 2014, predominantly due to strong growth in asset-based
 
fees and higher net interest income primarily driven by growth in investment and loan portfolios. Noninterest expense increased 4% from first quarter 2014, primarily due to brokerage volume-based expenses and higher other expenses. Total provision for credit losses increased $5 million from first quarter 2014. 


13


Balance Sheet Analysis 
At March 31, 2015, our assets totaled $1.7 trillion, up $50.6 billion from December 31, 2014. The predominant areas of asset growth were in federal funds sold and other short-term investments, which increased $32.9 billion, investment securities, which increased $11.8 billion, and mortgages held for sale, which increased $4.1 billion. Deposit growth of $28.4 billion, an increase in short-term borrowings of $14.2 billion, and total equity growth of $4.7 billion from December 31, 2014, were the predominant sources that funded our asset growth in first quarter 2015. Equity growth benefited from $3.6 billion in
 
earnings net of dividends paid. The strength of our business model produced solid earnings and continued internal capital generation.
The following discussion provides additional information about the major components of our balance sheet. Information regarding our capital and changes in our asset mix is included in the “Earnings Performance – Net Interest Income” and “Capital Management” sections and Note 19 (Regulatory and Agency Capital Requirements) to Financial Statements in this Report.
 


Investment Securities
 
Table 5:  Investment Securities – Summary
 
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
(in millions)
Amortized Cost

 
Net
 unrealized
gain

 
Fair value

 
Amortized Cost

 
Net
unrealized
gain

 
Fair value

Available-for-sale securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt securities
$
247,757

 
6,342

 
254,099

 
247,747

 
6,019

 
253,766

Marketable equity securities
1,919

 
1,585

 
3,504

 
1,906

 
1,770

 
3,676

Total available-for-sale securities
249,676

 
7,927

 
257,603

 
249,653

 
7,789

 
257,442

Held-to-maturity debt securities
67,133

 
1,648

 
68,781

 
55,483

 
876

 
56,359

Total investment securities (1)
$
316,809

 
9,575

 
326,384

 
305,136

 
8,665

 
313,801

(1)
Available-for-sale securities are carried on the balance sheet at fair value. Held-to-maturity securities are carried on the balance sheet at amortized cost.

Table 5 presents a summary of our investment securities portfolio, which increased $11.8 billion from December 31, 2014, predominantly due to purchases of U.S. Treasury securities and Federal agency mortgage-backed securities. The total net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities were $7.9 billion at March 31, 2015, up from $7.8 billion at December 31, 2014, due primarily to a decrease in long-term interest rates. For a discussion of our investment management objectives and practices, see the "Balance Sheet Analysis" section of our 2014 Form 10-K. Also, see the “Risk Management - Asset/Liability Management” section in this Report for information on our use of investments to manage liquidity and interest rate risk.
We analyze securities for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) quarterly or more often if a potential loss-triggering event occurs. Of the $73 million in OTTI write-downs recognized in earnings in first quarter 2015, $31 million related to debt securities and $42 million related to nonmarketable equity investments, which are included in other assets. For a discussion of our OTTI accounting policies and underlying considerations and analysis see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K and Note 4 (Investment Securities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
At March 31, 2015, investment securities included $49.5 billion of municipal bonds, of which 92.1% were rated “A-” or better based predominantly on external and, in some cases, internal ratings. Additionally, some of the securities in our total municipal bond portfolio are guaranteed against loss by bond insurers. These guaranteed bonds are substantially all investment grade and were generally underwritten in accordance with our own investment standards prior to the determination to purchase, without relying on the bond insurer’s guarantee in
 
making the investment decision. Our municipal bond holdings are monitored as part of our ongoing impairment analysis.
The weighted-average expected maturity of debt securities available-for-sale was 6.0 years at March 31, 2015. Because 50% of this portfolio is MBS, the expected remaining maturity is shorter than the remaining contractual maturity because borrowers generally have the right to prepay obligations before the underlying mortgages mature. The estimated effects of a 200 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates on the fair value and the expected remaining maturity of the MBS available-for-sale portfolio are shown in Table 6.
Table 6:  Mortgage-Backed Securities
(in billions)
Fair value

 
Net unrealized gain (loss)

 
Expected remaining maturity
(in years)
At March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
Actual
$
127.9

 
4.5

 
3.9
Assuming a 200 basis point:
 
 
 
 
 
Increase in interest rates
118.0

 
(5.4
)
 
6.0
Decrease in interest rates
131.0

 
7.6

 
2.4

The weighted-average expected maturity of debt securities held-to-maturity was 6.2 years at March 31, 2015. See Note 4 (Investment Securities) to Financial Statements in this Report for a summary of investment securities by security type.


14

Balance Sheet Analysis (continued)

Loan Portfolio
Total loans were $861.2 billion at March 31, 2015, down $1.3 billion from December 31, 2014. Table 7 provides a summary of total outstanding loans by non-strategic/liquidating and core loan portfolios. The decrease in the non-strategic/liquidating portfolios was $2.2 billion. Loans in the core portfolio grew
 
$914 million from December 31, 2014, primarily due to growth in real estate construction loans within the commercial loan portfolio segment.
Additional information on the non-strategic and liquidating loan portfolios is included in Table 12 in the “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management” section in this Report.

Table 7:  Loan Portfolios
 
 
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
(in millions)
 
Core

 
Liquidating

 
Total

 
Core

 
Liquidating

 
Total

Commercial
 
$
414,600

 
699

 
415,299

 
413,701

 
1,125

 
414,826

Consumer
 
388,077

 
57,855

 
445,932

 
388,062

 
59,663

 
447,725

Total loans
 
$
802,677

 
58,554

 
861,231

 
801,763

 
60,788

 
862,551

Change from prior quarter-end
 
$
914

 
(2,234
)
 
(1,320
)
 
25,972

 
(2,304
)
 
23,668


A discussion of average loan balances and a comparative detail of average loan balances is included in Table 1 under “Earnings Performance – Net Interest Income” earlier in this Report. Additional information on total loans outstanding by portfolio segment and class of financing receivable is included in the “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management” section in this Report. Period-end balances and other loan related information are in Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report. 
 
Table 8 shows contractual loan maturities for loan categories normally not subject to regular periodic principal reduction and distribution of loans in those categories to changes in interest rates.
 

Table 8:  Maturities for Selected Commercial Loan Categories
 
 
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
(in millions)
 
Within
one
 year

 
After one
year
through
five years

 
After
 five
years

 
Total

 
Within
one
year

 
After one
year
through
 five years

 
After
five
years

 
Total

Selected loan maturities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial and industrial
 
$
73,576

 
175,072

 
22,440

 
271,088

 
76,216

 
172,801

 
22,778

 
271,795

Real estate mortgage
 
17,458

 
60,473

 
33,917

 
111,848

 
17,485

 
61,092

 
33,419

 
111,996

Real estate construction
 
6,641

 
12,021

 
1,319

 
19,981

 
6,079

 
11,312

 
1,337

 
18,728

Total selected loans
 
$
97,675

 
247,566

 
57,676

 
402,917

 
99,780

 
245,205

 
57,534

 
402,519

Distribution of loans to changes in interest
rates:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans at fixed interest rates
 
$
15,942

 
26,049

 
20,919

 
62,910

 
15,574

 
25,429

 
20,002

 
61,005

Loans at floating/variable interest rates
 
81,733

 
221,517

 
36,757

 
340,007

 
84,206

 
219,776

 
37,532

 
341,514

Total selected loans
 
$
97,675

 
247,566

 
57,676

 
402,917

 
99,780

 
245,205

 
57,534

 
402,519



15


Deposits
Deposits totaled $1.2 trillion at both March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014. Table 9 provides additional information regarding deposits. Deposit growth of $28.4 billion from December 31, 2014, reflected continued customer-driven growth as well as liquidity-related issuances of term deposits. Information regarding the impact of deposits on net interest
 
income and a comparison of average deposit balances is provided in “Earnings Performance – Net Interest Income” and Table 1 earlier in this Report. Total core deposits were $1.1 trillion at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014. Core deposits were up $32.6 billion from December 31, 2014.
 

Table 9:  Deposits
($ in millions)
Mar 31,
2015

 
% of
total
deposits

 
Dec 31,
2014

 
% of
total
deposits

 
%
% Change

Noninterest-bearing
$
335,858

 
28
%
 
$
321,962

 
27
%
 
4

Interest-bearing checking
41,165

 
3

 
41,713

 
4

 
(1
)
Market rate and other savings
606,741

 
51

 
585,530

 
50

 
4

Savings certificates
33,494

 
3

 
35,354

 
3

 
(5
)
Foreign deposits (1)
69,735

 
6

 
69,789

 
6

 

Core deposits
1,086,993

 
91

 
1,054,348

 
90

 
3

Other time and savings deposits
73,303

 
6

 
76,322

 
7

 
(4
)
Other foreign deposits
36,367

 
3

 
37,640

 
3

 
(3
)
Total deposits
$
1,196,663

 
100
%
 
$
1,168,310

 
100
%
 
2

(1)
Reflects Eurodollar sweep balances included in core deposits.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We use fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain financial instruments and to determine fair value disclosures. See our 2014 Form 10-K for a description of our critical accounting policy related to fair value of financial instruments and a discussion of our fair value measurement techniques.
Table 10 presents the summary of the fair value of financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, and the amounts measured using significant Level 3 inputs (excluding derivative netting adjustments). The fair value of the remaining assets and liabilities were measured using valuation methodologies involving market-based or market-derived information (collectively Level 1 and 2 measurements).
Table 10:  Fair Value Level 3 Summary
 
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
($ in billions)
Total
balance

 
Level 3 (1)

 
Total
balance

 
Level 3 (1)

Assets carried
at fair value
$
380.6

 
30.4

 
378.1

 
32.3

As a percentage
of total assets
22
%
 
2

 
22

 
2

Liabilities carried
at fair value
$
38.2

 
2.1

 
34.9

 
2.3

As a percentage of
total liabilities
2
%
 
*

 
2

 

* Less than 1%.
(1) Excludes derivative netting adjustments.


 
See Note 13 (Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information on fair value measurements and a description of the the Level 1, 2 and 3 fair value hierarchy.
Equity
Total equity was $190.0 billion at March 31, 2015 compared with $185.3 billion at December 31, 2014. The increase was predominantly driven by a $3.6 billion increase in retained earnings from earnings net of dividends paid, and a $2.8 billion increase in preferred stock, partially offset by a net reduction in common stock due to repurchases.




16



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the ordinary course of business, we engage in financial transactions that are not recorded on the balance sheet, or may be recorded on the balance sheet in amounts that are different from the full contract or notional amount of the transaction. Our off-balance sheet arrangements include commitments to lend and purchase securities, transactions with unconsolidated entities, guarantees, derivatives, and other commitments. These transactions are designed to (1) meet the financial needs of customers, (2) manage our credit, market or liquidity risks, and/or (3) diversify our funding sources.
 
Commitments to Lend and Purchase Securities
We enter into commitments to lend funds to customers, which are usually at a stated interest rate, if funded, and for specific purposes and time periods. When we make commitments, we are exposed to credit risk. However, the maximum credit risk for these commitments will generally be lower than the contractual amount because a significant portion of these commitments are expected to expire without being used by the customer. For more information on lending commitments, see Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report. We also enter into commitments to purchase securities under resale agreements. For more information on commitments to purchase securities under resale agreements, see Note 3 (Federal Funds Sold, Securities Purchased under Resale Agreements and Other Short-Term Investments) to Financial Statements in this Report.
 
Transactions with Unconsolidated Entities
We routinely enter into various types of on- and off-balance sheet transactions with special purpose entities (SPEs), which are corporations, trusts or partnerships that are established for a limited purpose. Generally, SPEs are formed in connection with securitization transactions. For more information on securitizations, including sales proceeds and cash flows from securitizations, see Note 7 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
 
Guarantees and Certain Contingent Arrangements
Guarantees are contracts that contingently require us to make payments to a guaranteed party based on an event or a change in an underlying asset, liability, rate or index. Guarantees are generally in the form of standby letters of credit, securities lending and other indemnifications, written put options, recourse obligations and other types of guarantee arrangements.
For more information on guarantees and certain contingent arrangements, see Note 10 (Guarantees, Pledged Assets and Collateral) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Derivatives
We primarily use derivatives to manage exposure to market risk, including interest rate risk, credit risk and foreign currency risk, and to assist customers with their risk management objectives. Derivatives are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value and volume can be measured in terms of the notional amount, which is generally not exchanged, but is used only as the basis on which interest and other payments are determined. The notional amount is not recorded on the balance sheet and is not, when viewed in isolation, a meaningful measure of the risk profile of the instruments.
For more information on derivatives, see Note 12 (Derivatives) to Financial Statements in this Report.
 
Other Commitments
We also have other off-balance sheet transactions, including obligations to make rental payments under noncancelable operating leases and commitments to purchase certain debt and equity securities. Our operating lease obligations are discussed in Note 7 (Premises, Equipment, Lease Commitments and Other Assets) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K. For more information on commitments to purchase debt and equity securities, see the “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” section in our 2014 Form 10-K.



17


Risk Management
Financial institutions must manage a variety of business risks that can significantly affect their financial performance. Among the key risks that we must manage are operational risks, credit risks, and asset/liability management risks, which include interest rate, market, and liquidity and funding risks. Our risk culture is strongly rooted in our Vision and Values, and in order to succeed in our mission of satisfying all our customers’ financial needs and helping them succeed financially, our business practices and operating model must support prudent risk management practices. For more information about how we manage these risks, see the “Risk Management” section in our 2014 Form 10-K. The discussion that follows provides an update regarding these risks.
Operational Risk Management
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal controls and processes, people and systems, or resulting from external events. These losses may be caused by events such as fraud, breaches of customer privacy, business disruptions, inappropriate employee behavior, vendors that do not perform their responsibilities and regulatory fines and penalties.
Information security is a significant operational risk for financial institutions such as Wells Fargo, and includes the risk of losses resulting from cyber attacks. Wells Fargo and other financial institutions continue to be the target of various evolving and adaptive cyber attacks, including malware and denial-of-service, as part of an effort to disrupt the operations of financial institutions, potentially test their cybersecurity capabilities, or obtain confidential, proprietary or other information. Wells Fargo has not experienced any material losses relating to these or other cyber attacks. Addressing cybersecurity risks is a priority for Wells Fargo, and we continue to develop and enhance our controls, processes and systems in order to protect our networks, computers, software and data from attack, damage or unauthorized access. We are also proactively involved in industry cybersecurity efforts and working with other parties, including our third-party service providers and governmental agencies, to continue to enhance defenses and improve resiliency to cybersecurity threats. See the “Risk Factors” section in our 2014 Form 10-K for additional information regarding the risks associated with a failure or breach of our operational or security systems or infrastructure, including as a result of cyber attacks.



18


Credit Risk Management
We define credit risk as the risk of loss associated with a borrower or counterparty default (failure to meet obligations in accordance with agreed upon terms). Credit risk exists with many of our assets and exposures such as debt security holdings, certain derivatives, and loans. The following discussion focuses on our loan portfolios, which represent the largest component of assets on our balance sheet for which we have credit risk. Table 11 presents our total loans outstanding by portfolio segment and class of financing receivable.
Table 11:  Total Loans Outstanding by Portfolio Segment and Class of Financing Receivable
(in millions)
Mar 31, 2015

 
Dec 31, 2014

Commercial:
 
 
 
Commercial and industrial
$
271,088

 
271,795

Real estate mortgage
111,848

 
111,996

Real estate construction
19,981

 
18,728

Lease financing
12,382

 
12,307

Total commercial
415,299

 
414,826

Consumer:
 
 
 
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
265,213

 
265,386

Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage
57,839

 
59,717

Credit card
30,078

 
31,119

Automobile
56,339

 
55,740

Other revolving credit and installment
36,463

 
35,763

Total consumer
445,932

 
447,725

Total loans
$
861,231

 
862,551


 
We manage our credit risk by establishing what we believe are sound credit policies for underwriting new business, while monitoring and reviewing the performance of our existing loan portfolios. We employ various credit risk management and monitoring activities to mitigate risks associated with multiple risk factors affecting loans we hold, could acquire or originate including:
Loan concentrations and related credit quality
Counterparty credit risk
Economic and market conditions
Legislative or regulatory mandates
Changes in interest rates
Merger and acquisition activities
Reputation risk

Our credit risk management oversight process is governed centrally, but provides for decentralized management and accountability by our lines of business. Our overall credit process includes comprehensive credit policies, disciplined credit underwriting, frequent and detailed risk measurement and modeling, extensive credit training programs, and a continual loan review and audit process.
A key to our credit risk management is adherence to a well-controlled underwriting process, which we believe is appropriate for the needs of our customers as well as investors who purchase the loans or securities collateralized by the loans.




19


Credit Quality Overview  Credit quality continued to improve during first quarter 2015 due in part to improving economic conditions, in particular the housing market, as well as our proactive credit risk management activities. In particular:
Nonaccrual loans totaled $2.2 billion at both March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, in our commercial portfolio and decreased to $10.3 billion in our consumer portfolio at March 31, 2015, compared with $10.6 billion at December 31, 2014. Nonaccrual loans represented 1.45% of total loans at March 31, 2015, compared with 1.49% at December 31, 2014.
Net charge-offs (annualized) as a percentage of average total loans improved to 0.33% in first quarter 2015, compared with 0.41% for the same period a year ago. Net charge-offs (annualized) as a percentage of our average commercial and consumer portfolios were 0.04% and 0.60% in first quarter 2015, respectively, compared with 0.01% and 0.75%, respectively, in first quarter 2014.
Loans that are not government insured/guaranteed and 90 days or more past due and still accruing were $74 million and $767 million in our commercial and consumer portfolios, respectively, at March 31, 2015, compared with $47 million and $873 million at December 31, 2014.
 
Various economic indicators such as home prices influenced our evaluation of the allowance and provision for credit losses. Accordingly:
Our provision for credit losses was $608 million in first quarter 2015, compared with $325 million for the same period a year ago.
 
The allowance for credit losses decreased to $13.0 billion, or 1.51% of total loans, at March 31, 2015 from $13.2 billion, or 1.53%, at December 31, 2014.
 
Additional information on our loan portfolios and our credit quality trends follows.

Non-Strategic and Liquidating Loan Portfolios  We continually evaluate and, when appropriate, modify our credit policies to address appropriate levels of risk. We may designate certain portfolios and loan products as non-strategic or liquidating after which we cease their continued origination and actively work to limit losses and reduce our exposures.
Table 12 identifies our non-strategic and liquidating loan portfolios. They consist primarily of the Pick-a-Pay mortgage portfolio and PCI loans acquired from Wachovia, certain portfolios from legacy Wells Fargo Home Equity and Wells Fargo Financial, and our Education Finance government guaranteed student loan portfolio. The total balance of our non-strategic and liquidating loan portfolios has decreased 69% since the merger with Wachovia at December 31, 2008, and decreased 4% from the end of 2014.
Additional information regarding the liquidating PCI and Pick-a-Pay loan portfolios is provided in the discussion of loan portfolios that follows.


Table 12:  Non-Strategic and Liquidating Loan Portfolios
 
 
 
 
 
 
Outstanding balance
 
 
Mar 31,

 
December 31,
 
(in millions)
2015

 
2014

 
2008

Commercial:
 
 
 
 
 
Legacy Wachovia commercial and industrial and commercial real estate PCI loans (1)
$
699

 
1,125

 
18,704

Total commercial
699

 
1,125

 
18,704

Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
Pick-a-Pay mortgage (1)(2)
43,745

 
45,002

 
95,315

Legacy Wells Fargo Financial debt consolidation (3)
11,067

 
11,417

 
25,299

Liquidating home equity
2,744

 
2,910

 
10,309

Legacy Wachovia other PCI loans (1)
276

 
300

 
2,478

Legacy Wells Fargo Financial indirect auto (3)
23

 
34

 
18,221

Education Finance - government insured

 

 
20,465

Total consumer
57,855

 
59,663

 
172,087

Total non-strategic and liquidating loan portfolios
$
58,554

 
60,788

 
190,791

(1)
Net of purchase accounting adjustments related to PCI loans.
(2)
Includes PCI loans of $21.0 billion, $21.5 billion and $37.6 billion at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and 2008, respectively.
(3)
When we refer to “legacy Wells Fargo,” we mean Wells Fargo excluding Wachovia Corporation (Wachovia).





20

Risk Management - Credit Risk Management (continued)

PURCHASED CREDIT-IMPAIRED (PCI) LOANS Loans acquired with evidence of credit deterioration since their origination and where it is probable that we will not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments are PCI loans. A nonaccretable difference is established for PCI loans to absorb losses expected on the contractual amounts of those loans in excess of the fair value recorded at the date of acquisition. Amounts absorbed by the nonaccretable difference do not affect the income statement or the allowance for credit losses. Substantially all of our PCI loans were acquired in the Wachovia acquisition on December 31, 2008. PCI loans are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition, and the historical allowance for credit losses related to these loans is not carried over. The carrying value of PCI loans totaled $22.4 billion at March 31, 2015, down from $23.3 billion and $58.8 billion at December 31, 2014 and 2008, respectively, and $2.9 billion in nonaccretable difference remains at March 31, 2015, to absorb losses on PCI loans. Such loans are considered to be accruing due to the existence of the accretable yield and not based on consideration given to contractual interest payments.
Since December 31, 2008, we have released over $10.5 billion in nonaccretable difference, including $8.6 billion transferred from the nonaccretable difference to the accretable yield and $1.9 billion released to income through loan resolutions. Also, we have provided $1.7 billion for losses on certain PCI loans or pools of PCI loans that have had credit-related decreases to cash flows expected to be collected. Through March 31, 2015, cumulative losses on PCI loans were $8.8 billion lower than our December 31, 2008 initial expectation of $41.0 billion.
For additional information on PCI loans, see the “Risk Management - Credit Risk Management - Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans” section and Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K, and Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.



21


Significant Loan Portfolio Reviews Measuring and monitoring our credit risk is an ongoing process that tracks delinquencies, collateral values, FICO scores, economic trends by geographic areas, loan-level risk grading for certain portfolios (typically commercial) and other indications of credit risk. Our credit risk monitoring process is designed to enable early identification of developing risk and to support our determination of an appropriate allowance for credit losses. The following discussion provides additional characteristics and analysis of our significant portfolios. See Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report for more analysis and credit metric information for each of the following portfolios.

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL LOANS AND LEASE FINANCING  For purposes of portfolio risk management, we aggregate commercial and industrial loans and lease financing according to market segmentation and standard industry codes. We generally subject commercial and industrial loans and lease financing to individual risk assessment using our internal borrower and collateral quality ratings. Our ratings are aligned to regulatory definitions of pass and criticized categories with criticized divided between special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss categories.
The commercial and industrial loans and lease financing portfolio totaled $283.5 billion, or 33% of total loans, at March 31, 2015. The annualized net charge-off rate for this portfolio was 0.09% in first quarter 2015 compared with 0.12% in fourth quarter 2014, and 0.08% in first quarter 2014. At March 31, 2015, 0.24% of this portfolio was nonaccruing, compared with 0.20% at December 31, 2014. In addition, $16.6 billion of this portfolio was rated as criticized in accordance with regulatory guidance at March 31, 2015, compared with $16.7 billion at December 31, 2014
A majority of our commercial and industrial loans and lease financing portfolio is secured by short-term assets, such as accounts receivable, inventory and securities, as well as long-lived assets, such as equipment and other business assets. Generally, the collateral securing this portfolio represents a secondary source of repayment.
Table 13 provides a breakout of commercial and industrial loans and lease financing by industry, and includes $45.6 billion of foreign loans at March 31, 2015, that were reported in a separate foreign loan class in prior periods. Foreign loans totaled $15.7 billion within the investor category, $16.7 billion within the financial institutions category and $1.5 billion within the oil and gas category.
The investors category includes loans to special purpose vehicles (SPVs) formed by sponsoring entities to invest in financial assets backed predominantly by commercial and residential real estate or corporate cash flow, and are repaid from the asset cash flows or the sale of assets by the SPV. We limit loan amounts to a percentage of the value of the underlying assets, as determined by us, based primarily on analysis of underlying credit risk and other factors such as asset duration and ongoing performance.
 
The $16.7 billion of foreign loans in the financial institutions category were primarily originated by our Global Financial Institutions (GFI) business. We provide financial institutions with a variety of relationship focused products and services, including loans supporting short-term trade finance and working capital needs.
Slightly more than half of our oil and gas loans were to businesses in the exploration and production (E&P) sector. Most of these E&P loans are secured by oil and/or gas reserves and have underlying borrowing base arrangements which include regular (typically semi-annual) “redeterminations” that consider refinements to borrowing structure and prices used to determine borrowing limits. The remainder of the oil and gas loans were to midstream and services and equipment companies.

Table 13:  Commercial and Industrial Loans and Lease Financing by Industry (1)
 
March 31, 2015
 
(in millions)
Nonaccrual
loans

 
Total
portfolio

 
(2)
 
% of
total
loans

Investors
$
27

 
40,555

 
 
 
5
%
Financial institutions
24

 
34,985

 
 
 
4

Oil and gas
96

 
18,475

 
 
 
2

Food and beverage
13

 
14,328

 
 
 
2

Cyclical retailers
20

 
13,908

 
 
 
2

Healthcare
27

 
13,741

 
 
 
2

Industrial equipment
6

 
13,372

 
 
 
1

Real estate lessor
4

 
12,043

 
 
 
1

Public administration
10

 
8,386

 
 
 
1

Technology
33

 
7,815

 
 
 
1

Transportation
18

 
7,279

 
 
 
1

Business services
25

 
6,880

 
 
 
1

Other
383

 
91,703

 
(3)
 
10

Total
$
686

 
283,470

 
 
 
33
%
(1)
Industry categories are based on the North American Industry Classification System and the amounts reported include foreign loans. See Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report for a breakout of commercial foreign loans.
(2)
Includes $69 million PCI loans, which are considered to be accruing due to the existence of the accretable yield and not based on consideration given to contractual interest payments.
(3)
No other single industry had total loans in excess of $6.1 billion


22

Risk Management - Credit Risk Management (continued)

COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE (CRE) We generally subject CRE loans to individual risk assessment using our internal borrower and collateral quality ratings. Our ratings are aligned to regulatory definitions of pass and criticized categories with criticized divided between special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss categories. The CRE portfolio, which included $5.4 billion of foreign CRE loans, totaled $131.8 billion, or 15%, of total loans at March 31, 2015, and consisted of $111.8 billion of mortgage loans and $20.0 billion of construction loans.
On April 10, 2015, we announced an agreement to purchase approximately $9 billion of commercial real estate mortgage loans from GE Capital. This portfolio consists of performing loans primarily in the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada. We also agreed to provide $4 billion of secured financing to Blackstone Mortgage Trust for its purchase of a commercial mortgage portfolio. We expect the loan purchase and financing transactions to be completed in a series of closings during second and third quarter 2015.
 
Table 14 summarizes CRE loans by state and property type with the related nonaccrual totals. The portfolio is diversified both geographically and by property type. The largest geographic concentrations of combined CRE loans are in California and Texas which represented 28% and 8% of the total CRE portfolio, respectively. By property type, the largest concentrations are office buildings at 27% and apartments at 14% of the portfolio. CRE nonaccrual loans totaled 1.1% of the CRE outstanding balance at March 31, 2015, compared with 1.3% at December 31, 2014. At March 31, 2015, we had $7.2 billion of criticized CRE mortgage loans, compared with $7.9 billion at December 31, 2014, and $872 million of criticized CRE construction loans, down from $949 million at December 31, 2014.
At March 31, 2015, the recorded investment in PCI CRE loans totaled $1.0 billion, down from $12.3 billion when acquired at December 31, 2008, reflecting principal payments, loan resolutions and write-downs.


Table 14:  CRE Loans by State and Property Type
 
March 31, 2015
 
 
Real estate mortgage
 
 
 
 
Real estate construction
 
 
 
 
Total
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Nonaccrual
loans

 
Total
portfolio

 
(1)
 
Nonaccrual
loans

 
Total
portfolio

 
(1)
 
Nonaccrual
loans

 
Total
portfolio

 
(1)
 
% of
total
loans

By state:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
California
$
344

 
33,059

 
 
 
17

 
3,703

 
 
 
361

 
36,762

 
 
 
4
%
Texas
90

 
8,074

 
 
 
1

 
1,977

 
 
 
91

 
10,051

 
 
 
1

Florida
149

 
7,837

 
 
 
7

 
1,964

 
 
 
156

 
9,801

 
 
 
1

New York
35

 
6,463

 
 
 
15

 
1,504

 
 
 
50

 
7,967

 
 
 
1

North Carolina
86

 
3,841

 
 
 
8

 
899

 
 
 
94

 
4,740

 
 
 
1

Washington
35

 
3,579

 
 
 

 
682

 
 
 
35

 
4,261

 
 
 
*
Arizona
70

 
3,611

 
 
 
1

 
451

 
 
 
71

 
4,062

 
 
 
*
Georgia
93

 
3,133

 
 
 
24

 
435

 
 
 
117

 
3,568

 
 
 
*
Virginia
15

 
2,298

 
 
 
3

 
1,101

 
 
 
18

 
3,399

 
 
 
*
New Jersey
38

 
2,477

 
 
 
1

 
807

 
 
 
39

 
3,284

 
 
 
*
Other
369

 
37,476

 
 
 
105

 
6,458

 
 
 
474

 
43,934

 
(2)
 
5

Total
$
1,324

 
111,848

 
 
 
182

 
19,981

 
 
 
1,506

 
131,829

 
 
 
15
%
By property:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office buildings
$
357

 
33,197

 
 
 
1

 
2,532

 
 
 
358

 
35,729

 
 
 
4
%
Apartments
42

 
12,012

 
 
 
4

 
7,004

 
 
 
46

 
19,016

 
 
 
2

Industrial/warehouse
232

 
12,197

 
 
 

 
1,209

 
 
 
232

 
13,406

 
 
 
2

Retail (excluding shopping center)
165

 
12,280

 
 
 

 
798

 
 
 
165

 
13,078

 
 
 
2

Real estate - other
155

 
11,227

 
 
 

 
379

 
 
 
155

 
11,606

 
 
 
1

Shopping center
67

 
8,896

 
 
 

 
1,129

 
 
 
67

 
10,025

 
 
 
1

Hotel/motel
49

 
8,407

 
 
 

 
993

 
 
 
49

 
9,400

 
 
 
1

Institutional
56

 
3,153

 
 
 

 
540

 
 
 
56

 
3,693

 
 
 
*
1-4 Family structure

 
418

 
 
 
31

 
2,109

 
 
 
31

 
2,527

 
 
 
*
Agriculture
33

 
2,353

 
 
 

 
18

 
 
 
33

 
2,371

 
 
 
*
Other
168

 
7,708

 
 
 
146

 
3,270

 
 
 
314

 
10,978

 
 
 
1

Total
$
1,324

 
111,848

 
 
 
182

 
19,981

 
 
 
1,506

 
131,829

 
 
 
15
%
*
Less than 1%.
(1)
Includes a total of $1.0 billion PCI loans, consisting of $886 million of real estate mortgage and $123 million of real estate construction, which are considered to be accruing due to the existence of the accretable yield and not based on consideration given to contractual interest payments.
(2)
Includes 40 states; no state had loans in excess of $3.2 billion.



23


FOREIGN LOANS AND COUNTRY RISK EXPOSURE We classify loans for financial statement and certain regulatory purposes as foreign primarily based on whether the borrower’s primary address is outside of the United States. At March 31, 2015, foreign loans totaled $51.6 billion, representing approximately 6% of our total consolidated loans outstanding, compared with $50.6 billion, or approximately 6% of total consolidated loans outstanding, at December 31, 2014. Foreign loans were approximately 3% of our consolidated total assets at March 31, 2015 and at December 31, 2014.
Our foreign country risk monitoring process incorporates frequent dialogue with our financial institution customers, counterparties and regulatory agencies, enhanced by centralized monitoring of macroeconomic and capital markets conditions in the respective countries. We establish exposure limits for each country through a centralized oversight process based on customer needs, and in consideration of relevant economic, political, social, legal, and transfer risks. We monitor exposures closely and adjust our country limits in response to changing conditions.
We evaluate our individual country risk exposure on an ultimate country of risk basis, which is normally based on the country of residence of the guarantor or collateral location, and is different from the reporting based on the borrower’s primary
 
address. Our largest single foreign country exposure on an ultimate risk basis at March 31, 2015, was the United Kingdom, which totaled $20.9 billion, or approximately 1% of our total assets, and included $4.3 billion of sovereign claims. Our United Kingdom sovereign claims arise predominantly from deposits we have placed with the Bank of England pursuant to regulatory requirements in support of our London branch.
We conduct periodic stress tests of our significant country risk exposures, analyzing the direct and indirect impacts on the risk of loss from various macroeconomic and capital markets scenarios. We do not have significant exposure to foreign country risks because our foreign portfolio is relatively small. However, we have identified exposure to increased loss from U.S. borrowers associated with the potential impact of a regional or worldwide economic downturn on the U.S. economy. We mitigate these potential impacts on the risk of loss through our normal risk management processes which include active monitoring and, if necessary, the application of aggressive loss mitigation strategies.
Table 15 provides information regarding our top 20 exposures by country (excluding the U.S.) and our Eurozone exposure, on an ultimate risk basis.

Table 15:  Select Country Exposures
 
Lending (1)
 
 
Securities (2)
 
 
Derivatives and other (3)
 
 
Total exposure
 
(in millions)
Sovereign

 
Non-
sovereign

 
Sovereign

 
Non-
sovereign

 
Sovereign

 
Non-
sovereign

 
Sovereign

 
Non-
sovereign (4)

 
Total

March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top 20 country exposures:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United Kingdom
$
4,305

 
10,211

 

 
3,370

 

 
3,031

 
4,305

 
16,612

 
20,917

Canada

 
9,604

 

 
1,250

 

 
568

 

 
11,422

 
11,422

Cayman Islands

 
2,744

 

 

 

 
36

 

 
2,780

 
2,780

Brazil

 
2,642

 
1

 
15

 

 
4

 
1

 
2,661

 
2,662

Netherlands

 
2,253

 

 
261

 

 
54

 

 
2,568

 
2,568

Ireland
50

 
2,131

 

 
158

 

 
106

 
50

 
2,395

 
2,445

China

 
2,246

 

 
148

 
11

 
24

 
11

 
2,418

 
2,429

Bermuda

 
2,279

 

 
59

 

 
25

 

 
2,363

 
2,363

Germany
24

 
1,334

 

 
600

 

 
142

 
24

 
2,076

 
2,100

France

 
427

 

 
1,101

 

 
537

 

 
2,065

 
2,065

Turkey

 
1,669

 

 

 

 
1

 

 
1,670

 
1,670

Luxembourg

 
1,542

 

 
100

 

 
19

 

 
1,661

 
1,661

India

 
1,520

 

 
134

 

 

 

 
1,654

 
1,654

Switzerland

 
1,042

 

 
372

 

 
97

 

 
1,511

 
1,511

Mexico

 
1,244

 

 
41

 

 
133

 

 
1,418

 
1,418

Australia
16

 
651

 

 
565

 

 
86

 
16

 
1,302

 
1,318

Chile

 
1,169

 

 
67

 

 
45

 

 
1,281

 
1,281

Guernsey

 
768

 

 

 

 

 

 
768

 
768

Spain

 
616

 

 
58

 

 
9

 

 
683

 
683

Colombia
21

 
642

 

 
6

 

 
4

 
21

 
652

 
673

Total top 20 country exposures
$
4,416

 
46,734

 
1

 
8,305

 
11

 
4,921

 
4,428

 
59,960

 
64,388

Eurozone exposure:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Eurozone countries included in Top 20 above (5)
$
74

 
8,303

 

 
2,278

 

 
867

 
74

 
11,448

 
11,522

Austria

 
458

 

 
1

 

 
3

 

 
462

 
462

Italy

 
139

 

 
93

 

 
18

 

 
250

 
250

Belgium

 
93

 

 
16

 

 
12

 

 
121

 
121

Other Eurozone exposure (6)
18

 
34

 

 
33

 

 
4

 
18

 
71

 
89

Total Eurozone exposure
$
92

 
9,027

 

 
2,421

 

 
904

 
92

 
12,352

 
12,444

(1)
Lending exposure includes funded loans and unfunded commitments, leveraged leases, and money market placements presented on a gross basis prior to the deduction of impairment allowance and collateral received under the terms of the credit agreements. For the countries listed above, includes $46 million in PCI loans, predominantly to customers in the Netherlands and Germany, and $1.8 billion in defeased leases secured largely by U.S. Treasury and government agency securities, or government guaranteed.
(2)
Represents exposure on debt and equity securities of foreign issuers.
(3)
Represents counterparty exposure on foreign exchange and derivative contracts, and securities resale and lending agreements. This exposure is presented net of counterparty netting adjustments and reduced by the amount of cash collateral. It includes credit default swaps (CDS) predominantly used to manage our U.S. and London-based cash credit trading businesses, which sometimes results in selling and purchasing protection on the identical reference entity. Generally, we do not use market instruments such as CDS to hedge the credit risk of our investment or loan positions, although we do use them to manage risk in our trading businesses. At March 31, 2015, the gross notional amount of our CDS sold that reference assets in the Top 20 or Eurozone countries was $3.0 billion, which was offset by the notional amount of CDS purchased of $3.0 billion. We did not have any CDS purchased or sold that reference pools of assets that contain sovereign debt or where the reference asset was solely the sovereign debt of a foreign country.
(4)
For countries presented in the table, total non-sovereign exposure comprises $19.0 billion exposure to financial institutions and $41.9 billion to non-financial corporations at March 31, 2015.
(5)
Consists of exposure to Netherlands, Ireland, Germany, France, Luxembourg and Spain included in Top 20.
(6)
Includes non-sovereign exposure to Portugal and Greece in the amount of $53 million and $7 million, respectively, and less than $1 million to Cyprus. We had no sovereign debt exposure to these countries at March 31, 2015.

24

Risk Management - Credit Risk Management (continued)

REAL ESTATE 1-4 FAMILY FIRST AND JUNIOR LIEN MORTGAGE LOANS  Our real estate 1-4 family first and junior lien mortgage loans primarily include loans we have made to customers and retained as part of our asset/liability management strategy. These loans, as presented in Table 16, include the Pick-a-Pay portfolio acquired from Wachovia which is discussed later
 
in this Report. These loans also include other purchased loans and loans included on our balance sheet as a result of consolidation of variable interest entities (VIEs).
 

Table 16:  Real Estate 1-4 Family First and Junior Lien Mortgage Loans
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
(in millions)
Balance

 
% of
portfolio

 
Balance

 
% of
portfolio

Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Core portfolio
$
210,288

 
65
%
 
$
208,852

 
64
%
Non-strategic and liquidating loan portfolios:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pick-a-Pay mortgage
43,745

 
14

 
45,002

 
14

PCI and liquidating first mortgage
11,180

 
3

 
11,532

 
4

Total non-strategic and liquidating loan portfolios
54,925

 
17

 
56,534

 
18

Total real estate 1-4 family first mortgage loans
265,213

 
82

 
265,386

 
82

Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Core portfolio
54,941

 
17

 
56,631

 
17

Non-strategic and liquidating loan portfolios
2,898

 
1

 
3,086

 
1

Total real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage loans
57,839

 
18

 
59,717

 
18

Total real estate 1-4 family mortgage loans
$
323,052

 
100
%
 
$
325,103

 
100
%

The real estate 1-4 family mortgage loan portfolio includes some loans with adjustable-rate features and some with an interest-only feature as part of the loan terms. Interest-only loans were approximately 11% and 12% of total loans at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. We believe we have manageable adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) reset risk across our owned mortgage loan portfolios. We do not offer option ARM products, nor do we offer variable-rate mortgage products with fixed payment amounts, commonly referred to within the financial services industry as negative amortizing mortgage loans. The option ARMs we do have are included in the Pick-a-Pay portfolio which was acquired from Wachovia and are part of our liquidating loan portfolios. Since our acquisition of the Pick-a-Pay loan portfolio at the end of 2008, the option payment portion of the portfolio has reduced from 86% to 40% at March 31, 2015, as a result of our modification activities and customers exercising their option to convert to fixed payments. For more information, see the “Pick-a-Pay Portfolio” section in this Report.
We continue to modify real estate 1-4 family mortgage loans to assist homeowners and other borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. For more information on our participation in the U.S. Treasury’s Making Home Affordable (MHA) programs, see the “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management – Real Estate 1-4 Family First and Junior Lien Mortgage Loans” section in our 2014 Form 10-K.
Part of our credit monitoring includes tracking delinquency, FICO scores and loan/combined loan to collateral values (LTV/CLTV) on the entire real estate 1-4 family mortgage loan portfolio. These credit risk indicators, which exclude government insured/guaranteed loans, continued to improve in first quarter 2015 on the non-PCI mortgage portfolio. Loans 30 days or more delinquent at March 31, 2015, totaled $9.3 billion, or 3%, of total non-PCI mortgages, compared with $10.2 billion, or 3%, at December 31, 2014. Loans with FICO scores lower than 640 totaled $25.2 billion at March 31, 2015, or 8% of total non-PCI mortgages, compared with $25.8 billion, or 9%, at December 31, 2014. Mortgages with a LTV/CLTV greater than 100% totaled $19.4 billion at March 31, 2015, or 6% of total non-PCI
 
mortgages, compared with $20.3 billion, or 7%, at December 31, 2014. Information regarding credit quality indicators, including PCI credit quality indicators, can be found in Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Real estate 1-4 family first and junior lien mortgage loans by state are presented in Table 17. Our real estate 1-4 family mortgage loans to borrowers in California represented approximately 13% of total loans at March 31, 2015, located mostly within the larger metropolitan areas, with no single California metropolitan area consisting of more than 4% of total loans. We monitor changes in real estate values and underlying economic or market conditions for all geographic areas of our real estate 1-4 family mortgage portfolio as part of our credit risk management process. Our underwriting and periodic review of loans secured by residential real estate collateral includes appraisals or estimates from automated valuation models (AVMs) to support property values. Additional information about AVMs and our policy for their use can be found in Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report and the “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management – Real Estate 1-4 Family First and Junior Lien Mortgage Loans” section in our 2014 Form 10-K.


25


Table 17:  Real Estate 1-4 Family First and Junior Lien Mortgage Loans by State
 
March 31, 2015
 
(in millions)
Real estate
1-4 family
first
mortgage

 
Real estate
1-4 family
junior lien
mortgage

 
Total real
estate 1-4
family
mortgage

 
% of
total
loans

Real estate 1-4 family loans (excluding PCI):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
California
$
81,434

 
16,027

 
97,461

 
11
%
New York
17,979

 
2,586

 
20,565

 
2

Florida
14,124

 
5,275

 
19,399

 
2

New Jersey
11,024

 
4,723

 
15,747

 
2

Virginia
6,982

 
3,209

 
10,191

 
1

Texas
7,945

 
846

 
8,791

 
1

Pennsylvania
5,762

 
2,900

 
8,662

 
1

North Carolina
5,926

 
2,552

 
8,478

 
1

Washington
6,036

 
1,423

 
7,459

 
1

Other (2)
61,260

 
18,210

 
79,470

 
10

Government insured/
guaranteed loans (3)
25,518

 

 
25,518

 
3

Total
$
243,990

 
57,751

 
301,741

 
35
%
Real estate 1-4
family PCI loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
California
$
14,703

 
23

 
14,726

 
2
%
Florida
1,560

 
14

 
1,574

 
  *
New Jersey
753

 
13

 
766

 
  *
Other (1)
4,207

 
38

 
4,245

 
1

Total
$
21,223

 
88

 
21,311

 
3
%
Total
$
265,213

 
57,839

 
323,052

 
38
%
*
Less than 1%.
(1)
Consists of 45 states; no state had loans in excess of $512 million.
(2)
Consists of 41 states; no state had loans in excess of $7.2 billion.
(3)
Represents loans whose repayments are predominantly insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).


26

Risk Management - Credit Risk Management (continued)

First Lien Mortgage Portfolio  The credit performance associated with our real estate 1-4 family first lien mortgage portfolio continued to improve in first quarter 2015, as measured through net charge-offs and nonaccrual loans. Net charge-offs (annualized) as a percentage of average total loans improved to 0.13% in first quarter 2015, compared with 0.27% in first quarter 2014. Nonaccrual loans were $8.3 billion at March 31, 2015, compared with $8.6 billion at December 31, 2014. Improvement in the credit performance was driven by both an improving
 
economic and housing environment and declining balances in non-strategic and liquidating loans, which have been replaced with higher quality assets originated after 2008 utilizing tighter underwriting standards. Real estate 1-4 family first lien mortgage loans originated after 2008 have resulted in minimal losses to date and were approximately 61% of our total real estate 1-4 family first lien mortgage portfolio as of March 31, 2015. First lien mortgage portfolios by state are presented in Table 18.

Table 18: First Lien Mortgage Portfolios Performance (1)
 
Outstanding balance

 
 
% of loans two payments or more past due
 
Loss (recovery) rate (annualized) quarter ended
 
Mar 31,

Dec 31,

 
Mar 31,

Dec 31,
 
Mar 31,
Dec 31,
Sep 30,

Jun 30,
Mar 31,
(in millions)
2015

2014

 
2015

2014
 
2015
2014
2014

2014
2014
Core portfolio:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
California
$
68,063

67,038

 
0.74
%
0.83
 
0.01

0.01
0.04
New York
16,623

16,102

 
1.94

1.97
 
0.04
0.06
0.09

0.09
0.17
Florida
10,929

10,991

 
3.42

3.78
 
0.05
0.04
0.10

0.12
0.26
New Jersey
9,258

9,203

 
3.92

3.95
 
0.19
0.21
0.25

0.33
0.46
Texas
6,630

6,646

 
1.22

1.48
 
0.01
0.01
(0.02
)
0.01
0.02
Other
73,267

72,604

 
2.10

2.34
 
0.15
0.12
0.14

0.16
0.31
Total
184,770

182,584

 
1.72

1.89
 
0.08
0.07
0.08

0.10
0.20
Government insured/guaranteed loans
25,518

26,268

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total core portfolio including government insured/guaranteed loans
210,288

208,852

 
1.72

1.89
 
0.08
0.07
0.08

0.10
0.20
Non-strategic and liquidating portfolios
33,702

34,822

 
14.42

15.55
 
0.58
0.62
0.83

0.99
0.93
Total first lien mortgages
$
243,990

243,674

 
3.68
%
4.08
 
0.16
0.16
0.21

0.26
0.34
(1)
Excludes PCI loans because their losses were generally reflected in PCI accounting adjustments at the date of acquisition.
 
Our total real estate 1-4 family first lien mortgage portfolio decreased $173 million in first quarter 2015 as a result of runoff in our real estate 1-4 family first lien mortgage non-strategic and liquidating portfolios. Excluding this runoff, our core real estate 1-4 family first lien mortgage portfolio increased $1.4 billion, as we retained $11.2 billion in non-conforming originations, primarily consisting of loans that exceed conventional conforming loan amount limits established by federal government-sponsored entities (GSEs), in first quarter 2015.




27


Pick‑a‑Pay Portfolio  The Pick-a-Pay portfolio was one of the consumer residential first mortgage portfolios we acquired from Wachovia and a majority of the portfolio was identified as PCI loans.
The Pick-a-Pay portfolio includes loans that offer payment options (Pick-a-Pay option payment loans), and also includes loans that were originated without the option payment feature, loans that no longer offer the option feature as a result of our modification efforts since the acquisition, and loans where the customer voluntarily converted to a fixed-rate product. The Pick-a-Pay portfolio is included in the consumer real estate 1-4 family
 
first mortgage class of loans throughout this Report. Table 19 provides balances by types of loans as of March 31, 2015, as a result of modification efforts, compared to the types of loans included in the portfolio at acquisition. Total adjusted unpaid principal balance of PCI Pick-a-Pay loans was $25.8 billion at March 31, 2015, compared with $61.0 billion at acquisition. Primarily due to modification efforts, the adjusted unpaid principal balance of option payment PCI loans has declined to 15% of the total Pick-a-Pay portfolio at March 31, 2015, compared with 51% at acquisition.

Table 19:  Pick-a-Pay Portfolio - Comparison to Acquisition Date
 
 
 
December 31,
 
 
March 31, 2015
 
 
2014
 
 
2008
 
(in millions)
Adjusted
unpaid
principal
balance (1)

 
% of
total

 
Adjusted
unpaid
principal
balance (1)

 
% of
total

 
Adjusted
unpaid
principal
balance (1)

 
% of
total

Option payment loans
$
19,446

 
40
%
 
$
20,258

 
41
%
 
$
99,937

 
86
%
Non-option payment adjustable-rate
and fixed-rate loans
6,525

 
14

 
6,776

 
14

 
15,763

 
14

Full-term loan modifications
22,407

 
46

 
22,674

 
45

 

 

Total adjusted unpaid principal balance
$
48,378

 
100
%
 
$
49,708

 
100
%
 
$
115,700

 
100
%
Total carrying value
$
43,745

 
 
 
45,002

 
 
 
95,315

 
 
(1)
Adjusted unpaid principal balance includes write-downs taken on loans where severe delinquency (normally 180 days) or other indications of severe borrower financial stress exist that indicate there will be a loss of contractually due amounts upon final resolution of the loan.

 Table 20 reflects the geographic distribution of the Pick-a-Pay portfolio broken out between PCI loans and all other loans. The LTV ratio is a useful metric in evaluating future real estate 1-4 family first mortgage loan performance, including potential charge-offs. Because PCI loans were initially recorded at fair value, including write-downs for expected credit losses, the ratio of the carrying value to the current collateral value will be lower compared with the LTV based on the adjusted unpaid principal balance. For informational purposes, we have included both ratios for PCI loans in the following table.


28

Risk Management - Credit Risk Management (continued)

Table 20:  Pick-a-Pay Portfolio (1)
 
March 31, 2015
 
 
PCI loans
 
 
All other loans
 
(in millions)
Adjusted
unpaid
principal
balance (2)

 
Current
LTV
ratio (3)

 
Carrying
value (4)

 
Ratio of
carrying
value to
current
value (5)

 
Carrying
value (4)

 
Ratio of
carrying
value to
current
value (5)

California
$
17,901

 
76
%
 
$
14,690

 
61
%
 
$
11,037

 
56
%
Florida
2,047

 
86

 
1,525

 
61

 
2,286

 
70

New Jersey
863

 
82

 
727

 
64

 
1,482

 
70

New York
557

 
77

 
494

 
62

 
699

 
68

Texas
227

 
62

 
208

 
56

 
888

 
49

Other states
4,156

 
82

 
3,391

 
65

 
6,318

 
68

Total Pick-a-Pay loans
$
25,751

 
77

 
$
21,035

 
61

 
$
22,710

 
62

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
The individual states shown in this table represent the top five states based on the total net carrying value of the Pick-a-Pay loans at the beginning of 2015.
(2)
Adjusted unpaid principal balance includes write-downs taken on loans where severe delinquency (normally 180 days) or other indications of severe borrower financial stress exist that indicate there will be a loss of contractually due amounts upon final resolution of the loan.
(3)
The current LTV ratio is calculated as the adjusted unpaid principal balance divided by the collateral value. Collateral values are generally determined using automated valuation models (AVM) and are updated quarterly. AVMs are computer-based tools used to estimate market values of homes based on processing large volumes of market data including market comparables and price trends for local market areas.
(4)
Carrying value, which does not reflect the allowance for loan losses, includes remaining purchase accounting adjustments, which, for PCI loans may include the nonaccretable difference and the accretable yield and, for all other loans, an adjustment to mark the loans to a market yield at date of merger less any subsequent charge-offs.
(5)
The ratio of carrying value to current value is calculated as the carrying value divided by the collateral value.

In first quarter 2015, we completed nearly 1,000 proprietary and Home Affordability Modification Program (HAMP) Pick-a-Pay loan modifications. We have completed nearly 130,000 modifications since the Wachovia acquisition, resulting in $6.1 billion of principal forgiveness to our Pick-a-Pay customers. There remains $19 million of conditional forgiveness that can be earned by borrowers through performance over a three-year period.
Due to better than expected performance observed on the PCI portion of the Pick-a-Pay portfolio compared with the original acquisition estimates, we have reclassified $6.0 billion from the nonaccretable difference to the accretable yield since acquisition. Our cash flows expected to be collected have been favorably affected by lower expected defaults and losses as a result of observed and forecasted economic strengthening, particularly in housing prices, and our loan modification efforts. These factors are expected to reduce the frequency and severity of defaults and keep these loans performing for a longer period, thus increasing future principal and interest cash flows. The resulting increase in the accretable yield will be realized over the remaining life of the portfolio, which is estimated to have a weighted-average remaining life of approximately 11.5 years at March 31, 2015. The weighted average remaining life decreased slightly from December 31, 2014 due to the passage of time. The accretable yield percentage at March 31, 2015, was 6.21%, up from 6.15% at the end of 2014 due to favorable changes in the expected timing and composition of cash flows resulting from improving credit and prepayment expectations. Fluctuations in the accretable yield are driven by changes in interest rate indices for variable rate PCI loans, prepayment assumptions, and expected principal and interest payments over the estimated life of the portfolio, which will be affected by the pace and degree of improvements in the U.S. economy and housing markets and projected lifetime performance resulting from loan modification activity. Changes in the projected timing of cash flow events, including loan liquidations, modifications and short sales, can also affect the accretable yield and the estimated weighted-average life of the portfolio.
 
The predominant portion of our PCI loans is included in the Pick-a-Pay portfolio. For further information on the judgment involved in estimating expected cash flows for PCI loans, see the “Critical Accounting Policies – Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans” section and Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K.
For further information on the Pick-a-Pay portfolio, including recast risk, deferral of interest and loan modifications, see the "Risk Management - Credit Risk Management - Pick-a-Pay Portfolio" section in our 2014 Form 10-K.


29


Junior Lien Mortgage Portfolio  The junior lien mortgage portfolio consists of residential mortgage lines and loans that are subordinate in rights to an existing lien on the same property. It is not unusual for these lines and loans to have draw periods, interest only payments, balloon payments, adjustable rates and similar features. The majority of our junior lien loan products are amortizing payment loans with fixed interest rates and repayment periods between five to 30 years. 
We continuously monitor the credit performance of our junior lien mortgage portfolio for trends and factors that influence the frequency and severity of loss. We have observed that the severity of loss for junior lien mortgages is high and generally not affected by whether we or a third party own or service the related first mortgage, but the frequency of delinquency is typically lower when we own or service the first lien mortgage. In general, we have limited information available on the delinquency status of the third party owned or serviced senior lien where we also hold a junior lien. To capture this inherent loss content, we use the experience of our junior lien mortgages behind delinquent first liens that are owned or serviced by us adjusted for any observed differences in delinquency and loss rates associated with junior lien mortgages behind third party first mortgages. We incorporate this inherent loss content into our allowance for loan losses. Our allowance process for junior liens ensures appropriate consideration of the relative difference in loss experience for junior liens behind first lien mortgage loans we own or service, compared with those behind first lien mortgage loans owned or serviced by third
 
parties. In addition, our allowance process for junior liens that are current, but are in their revolving period, appropriately reflects the inherent loss where the borrower is delinquent on the corresponding first lien mortgage loans.
We monitor the number of borrowers paying the minimum amount due on a monthly basis. In March 2015, approximately 95% of our borrowers with a junior lien mortgage outstanding balance paid the minimum amount due or more, including approximately 45% who paid only the minimum amount due.
Table 21 shows the credit attributes of the core and liquidating junior lien mortgage portfolios and lists the top five states by outstanding balance for the core portfolio. Loans to California borrowers represent the largest state concentration in each of these portfolios. The decrease in outstanding balances since December 31, 2014, predominantly reflects loan paydowns. As of March 31, 2015, 20% of the outstanding balance of the junior lien mortgage portfolio was associated with loans that had a combined loan to value (CLTV) ratio in excess of 100%. Of those junior liens with a CLTV ratio in excess of 100%, 2.69% were two payments or more past due. CLTV means the ratio of the total loan balance of first mortgages and junior lien mortgages (including unused line amounts for credit line products) to property collateral value. The unsecured portion (the outstanding amount that was in excess of the most recent property collateral value) of the outstanding balances of these loans totaled 8% of the junior lien mortgage portfolio at March 31, 2015.

Table 21:  Junior Lien Mortgage Portfolios (1)
 
Outstanding balance
 
 
% of loans
two payments
or more past due
 
Loss rate
(annualized)
quarter ended
 
(in millions)
Mar 31,
2015

 
Dec 31,
2014

 
Mar 31,
2015

 
Dec 31,
2014
 
Mar 31,
2015

 
Dec 31,
2014

 
Sep 30,
2014

 
Jun 30,
2014

 
Mar 31,
2014

Core portfolio
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
California
$
15,048

 
15,535

 
1.98
%
 
2.07
 
0.30

 
0.33

 
0.44

 
0.47

 
0.67

Florida
5,148

 
5,283

 
2.75

 
2.96
 
1.10

 
1.22

 
1.29

 
1.23

 
1.86

New Jersey
4,618

 
4,705

 
3.17

 
3.43
 
1.15

 
1.37

 
1.38

 
1.45

 
1.49

Virginia
3,081

 
3,160

 
1.93

 
2.18
 
1.05

 
1.03

 
0.59

 
0.86

 
0.87

Pennsylvania
2,869

 
2,942

 
2.45

 
2.72
 
1.18

 
1.15

 
1.04

 
1.24

 
1.01

Other
24,177

 
25,006

 
2.06

 
2.20
 
0.84

 
0.78

 
0.83

 
1.05

 
1.15

Total
54,941

 
56,631

 
2.21

 
2.36
 
0.77

 
0.77

 
0.81

 
0.94

 
1.09

Liquidating portfolio
2,810

 
2,985

 
4.35

 
4.77
 
2.43

 
2.92

 
2.61

 
2.46

 
2.94

Total core and
liquidating portfolios
$
57,751

 
59,616

 
2.31
%
 
2.49
 
0.85

 
0.88

 
0.90

 
1.02

 
1.20

 
 
(1)
Excludes PCI loans because their losses were generally reflected in PCI accounting adjustments at the date of acquisition.

30

Risk Management - Credit Risk Management (continued)

Our junior lien, as well as first lien, lines of credit products generally have a draw period of 10 years (with some up to 15 or 20 years) with variable interest rate and payment options during the draw period of (1) interest only or (2) 1.5% of outstanding principal balance plus accrued interest. During the draw period, the borrower has the option of converting all or a portion of the line from a variable interest rate to a fixed rate with terms including interest-only payments for a fixed period between three to seven years or a fully amortizing payment with a fixed period between five to 30 years. At the end of the draw period, a line of credit generally converts to an amortizing payment schedule with repayment terms of up to 30 years based on the balance at time of conversion. Certain lines and loans have been structured with a balloon payment, which requires full repayment of the outstanding balance at the end of the term period. The conversion of lines or loans to fully amortizing or balloon payoff may result in a significant payment increase, which can affect some borrowers’ ability to repay the outstanding balance.
The lines that enter their amortization period may experience higher delinquencies and higher loss rates than the
 
ones in their draw or term period. We have considered this increased inherent risk in our allowance for credit loss estimate.
In anticipation of our borrowers reaching the end of their contractual commitment, we have created a program to inform, educate and help these borrowers transition from interest-only to fully-amortizing payments or full repayment. We monitor the performance of the borrowers moving through the program in an effort to refine our ongoing program strategy.
Table 22 reflects the outstanding balance of our portfolio of junior lien lines and loans and senior lien lines segregated into scheduled end of draw or end of term periods and products that are currently amortizing, or in balloon repayment status. It excludes real estate 1-4 family first lien line reverse mortgages, which total $2.3 billion, because they are predominantly insured by the FHA, and it excludes PCI loans, which total $117 million, because their losses were generally reflected in our nonaccretable difference established at the date of acquisition.

Table 22:  Junior Lien Mortgage Line and Loan and Senior Lien Mortgage Line Portfolios Payment Schedule
 
 
 
 
 
Scheduled end of draw / term
 
 
 
(in millions)
Outstanding balance
March 31, 2015

 
Remainder
of 2015

 
2016

 
2017

 
2018

 
2019

 
2020 and
thereafter (1)

 
Amortizing

Junior residential lines
$
51,114

 
4,019

 
6,073

 
6,396

 
3,460

 
1,348

 
24,568

 
5,250

Junior loans (2)
6,637

 
53

 
86

 
96

 
10

 
7

 
1,111

 
5,274

Total junior lien (3)(4)
57,751

 
4,072

 
6,159

 
6,492

 
3,470

 
1,355

 
25,679

 
10,524

First lien lines
16,811

 
875

 
881

 
901

 
1,026

 
451

 
11,393

 
1,284

Total (3)(4)
$
74,562

 
4,947

 
7,040

 
7,393

 
4,496

 
1,806

 
37,072

 
11,808

% of portfolios
100
%
 
7
%
 
9
%
 
10
%
 
6
%
 
2
%
 
50
%
 
16
%
(1)
The annual scheduled end of draw or term ranges from $1.7 billion to $9.7 billion and averages $5.3 billion per year for 2020 and thereafter. Loans that convert in 2025 and thereafter have draw periods that generally extend to 15 or 20 years.
(2)
Junior loans within the term period predominantly represent principal and interest products that require a balloon payment upon the end of the loan term. Amortizing junior loans include $59 million of balloon loans that have reached end of term and are now past due.
(3)
Lines in their draw period are predominantly interest-only. The unfunded credit commitments for junior and first lien lines totaled $69.7 billion at March 31, 2015.
(4)
Includes scheduled end-of-term balloon payments totaling $331 million, $358 million, $472 million, $501 million, $432 million and $1.9 billion for 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020 and thereafter, respectively. Amortizing lines include $151 million of end-of-term balloon payments, which are past due. At March 31, 2015, $420 million, or 6% of outstanding lines of credit that are amortizing, are 30 or more days past due compared to $1.1 billion, or 2% for lines in their draw period.

CREDIT CARDS  Our credit card portfolio totaled $30.1 billion at March 31, 2015, which represented 3% of our total outstanding loans. The net charge-off rate (annualized) for our credit card portfolio was 3.19% for first quarter 2015, compared with 3.57% for first quarter 2014.
 
AUTOMOBILE  Our automobile portfolio, predominantly composed of indirect loans, totaled $56.3 billion at March 31, 2015. The net charge-off rate (annualized) for our automobile portfolio was 0.73% for first quarter 2015, compared with 0.70% for first quarter 2014.

OTHER REVOLVING CREDIT AND INSTALLMENT Other revolving credit and installment loans totaled $36.5 billion at March 31, 2015, and primarily included student and security-based loans. Student loans totaled $12.2 billion at March 31, 2015. The net charge-off rate (annualized) for other revolving credit and installment loans was 1.32% for first quarter 2015, compared with 1.29% for first quarter 2014.



31


NONPERFORMING ASSETS (NONACCRUAL LOANS AND FORECLOSED ASSETS) Table 23 summarizes nonperforming assets (NPAs) for each of the last four quarters. We generally place loans on nonaccrual status when:
the full and timely collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain (generally based on an assessment of the borrower’s financial condition and the adequacy of collateral, if any);
they are 90 days (120 days with respect to real estate 1-4 family first and junior lien mortgages) past due for interest or principal, unless both well-secured and in the process of collection;
 
part of the principal balance has been charged off (including loans discharged in bankruptcy);
for junior lien mortgages, we have evidence that the related first lien mortgage may be 120 days past due or in the process of foreclosure regardless of the junior lien delinquency status; or
performing consumer loans are discharged in bankruptcy, regardless of their delinquency status.

Table 23:  Nonperforming Assets (Nonaccrual Loans and Foreclosed Assets)
 
 
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
 
September 30, 2014
 
 
June 30, 2014
 
($ in millions)
 
Balance

 
% of
total
loans

 
Balance

 
% of
total
loans

 
Balance

 
% of
total
loans

 
Balance

 
% of
total
loans

Nonaccrual loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial and industrial
 
$
663

 
0.24
%
 
$
538

 
0.20
%
 
$
614

 
0.24
%
 
$
724

 
0.29
%
Real estate mortgage
 
1,324

 
1.18

 
1,490

 
1.33

 
1,636

 
1.46

 
1,805

 
1.59

Real estate construction
 
182

 
0.91

 
187

 
1.00

 
217

 
1.20

 
239

 
1.38

Lease financing
 
23

 
0.19

 
24

 
0.20

 
27

 
0.22

 
29

 
0.24

Total commercial (1)
 
2,192

 
0.53

 
2,239

 
0.54

 
2,494

 
0.63

 
2,797

 
0.71

Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage (2)
 
8,345

 
3.15

 
8,583

 
3.23

 
8,785

 
3.34

 
9,026

 
3.47

Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage
 
1,798

 
3.11

 
1,848

 
3.09

 
1,903

 
3.13

 
1,965

 
3.14

Automobile
 
133

 
0.24

 
137

 
0.25

 
143

 
0.26

 
150

 
0.28

Other revolving credit and installment
 
42

 
0.12

 
41

 
0.11

 
40

 
0.11

 
34

 
0.10

Total consumer
 
10,318

 
2.31

 
10,609

 
2.37

 
10,871

 
2.46

 
11,175

 
2.55

Total nonaccrual loans (3)(4)(5)
 
12,510

 
1.45

 
12,848

 
1.49

 
13,365

 
1.59

 
13,972

 
1.69

Foreclosed assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Government insured/guaranteed (6)
 
772

 
 
 
982

 
 
 
1,140

 
 
 
1,257

 
 
Non-government insured/guaranteed
 
1,557

 
 
 
1,627

 
 
 
1,691

 
 
 
1,748

 
 
Total foreclosed assets
 
2,329

 
 
 
2,609

 
 
 
2,831

 
 
 
3,005

 
 
Total nonperforming assets
 
$
14,839

 
1.72
%
 
$
15,457

 
1.79
%
 
$
16,196

 
1.93
%
 
$
16,977

 
2.05
%
Change in NPAs from prior quarter
 
$
(618
)
 
 
 
(739
)
 
 
 
(781
)
 
 
 
(1,095
)
 
 
(1)
Includes LHFS of $1 million at March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014.
(2)
Includes MHFS of $144 million, $177 million, $182 million, and $238 million at March 31, 2015 and December 31, September 30, and June 30, 2014, respectively.
(3)
Excludes PCI loans because they continue to earn interest income from accretable yield, independent of performance in accordance with their contractual terms.
(4)
Real estate 1-4 family mortgage loans predominantly insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA and student loans predominantly guaranteed by agencies on behalf of the U.S. Department of Education under the Federal Family Education Loan Program are not placed on nonaccrual status because they are insured or guaranteed.
(5)
See Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report for further information on impaired loans.
(6)
Consistent with regulatory reporting requirements, foreclosed real estate resulting from government insured/guaranteed loans are classified as nonperforming. Both principal and interest related to these foreclosed real estate assets are collectible because the loans were predominantly insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA. Foreclosure of certain government guaranteed residential real estate mortgage loans that meet criteria specified by Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-14, Classification of Certain Government-Guaranteed Mortgage Loans Upon Foreclosure, effective as of January 1, 2014 are excluded from this table and included in Accounts Receivable in Other Assets. For more information on ASU 2014-14 and the classification of certain government-guaranteed mortgage loans upon foreclosure, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K.



32

Risk Management - Credit Risk Management (continued)

Table 24 provides an analysis of the changes in nonaccrual loans.

Table 24:  Analysis of Changes in Nonaccrual Loans
 
Quarter ended
 
(in millions)
Mar 31,
2015

 
Dec 31,
2014

 
Sep 30,
2014

 
Jun 30,
2014

 
Mar 31,
2014

Commercial nonaccrual loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, beginning of period
$
2,239

 
2,494

 
2,798

 
3,027

 
3,475

Inflows
496

 
410

 
342

 
433

 
367

Outflows:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Returned to accruing
(67
)
 
(64
)
 
(37
)
 
(81
)
 
(98
)
Foreclosures
(24
)
 
(45
)
 
(18
)
 
(32
)
 
(79
)
Charge-offs
(107
)
 
(141
)
 
(124
)
 
(120
)
 
(116
)
Payments, sales and other (1)
(345
)
 
(415
)
 
(467
)
 
(429
)
 
(522
)
Total outflows
(543
)
 
(665
)
 
(646
)
 
(662
)
 
(815
)
Balance, end of period
2,192


2,239


2,494


2,798


3,027

Consumer nonaccrual loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, beginning of period
10,609

 
10,871

 
11,174

 
11,623

 
12,193

Inflows
1,341

 
1,454

 
1,529

 
1,673

 
1,650

Outflows:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Returned to accruing
(686
)
 
(678
)
 
(817
)
 
(1,107
)
 
(1,104
)
Foreclosures
(111
)
 
(114
)
 
(148
)
 
(132
)
 
(146
)
Charge-offs
(265
)
 
(278
)
 
(289
)
 
(348
)
 
(400
)
Payments, sales and other (1)
(570
)
 
(646
)
 
(578
)
 
(535
)
 
(570
)
Total outflows
(1,632
)
 
(1,716
)
 
(1,832
)
 
(2,122
)
 
(2,220
)
Balance, end of period
10,318


10,609


10,871


11,174


11,623

Total nonaccrual loans
$
12,510

 
12,848

 
13,365

 
13,972

 
14,650

(1)
Other outflows include the effects of VIE deconsolidations and adjustments for loans carried at fair value.

Typically, changes to nonaccrual loans period-over-period represent inflows for loans that are placed on nonaccrual status in accordance with our policy, offset by reductions for loans that are paid down, charged off, sold, foreclosed, or are no longer classified as nonaccrual as a result of continued performance and an improvement in the borrower’s financial condition and loan repayment capabilities. Also, reductions can come from borrower repayments even if the loan remains on nonaccrual.
While nonaccrual loans are not free of loss content, we believe exposure to loss is significantly mitigated by the following factors at March 31, 2015:
98% of total commercial nonaccrual loans and 99% of total consumer nonaccrual loans are secured. Of the consumer nonaccrual loans, 98% are secured by real estate and 72% have a combined LTV (CLTV) ratio of 80% or less.
losses of $458 million and $3.5 billion have already been recognized on 28% of commercial nonaccrual loans and 52% of consumer nonaccrual loans, respectively. Generally, when a consumer real estate loan is 120 days past due (except when required earlier by guidance issued by bank regulatory agencies), we transfer it to nonaccrual status. When the loan reaches 180 days past due, or is discharged in bankruptcy, it is our policy to write these loans down to net realizable value (fair value of collateral less estimated costs to sell), except for modifications in their trial period that are not written down as long as trial payments are made on time. Thereafter, we
 
reevaluate each loan regularly and record additional write-downs if needed.
71% of commercial nonaccrual loans were current on interest.
the risk of loss of all nonaccrual loans has been considered and we believe is adequately covered by the allowance for loan losses.
$2.1 billion of consumer loans discharged in bankruptcy and classified as nonaccrual were 60 days or less past due, of which $1.9 billion were current.
 
We continue to work with our customers experiencing financial difficulty to determine if they can qualify for a loan modification so that they can stay in their homes. Under both our proprietary modification programs and the MHA programs, customers may be required to provide updated documentation, and some programs require completion of payment during trial periods to demonstrate sustained performance before the loan can be removed from nonaccrual status. In addition, for loans in foreclosure in certain states, including New York and New Jersey, the foreclosure timeline has significantly increased due to backlogs in an already complex process. Therefore, some loans may remain on nonaccrual status for a long period.
Table 25 provides a summary of foreclosed assets and an analysis of changes in foreclosed assets.


33


Table 25:  Foreclosed Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Mar 31,
2015

 
Dec 31,
2014

 
Sep 30,
2014

 
Jun 30,
2014

 
Mar 31,
2014

Summary by loan segment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Government insured/guaranteed
$
772

 
982

 
1,140

 
1,257

 
1,609

PCI loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
329

 
352

 
394

 
457

 
461

Consumer
197

 
212

 
214

 
208

 
177

Total PCI loans
526

 
564

 
608

 
665

 
638

All other loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
548

 
565

 
579

 
634

 
736

Consumer
483

 
498

 
504

 
449

 
439

Total all other loans
1,031

 
1,063

 
1,083

 
1,083

 
1,175

Total foreclosed assets
$
2,329

 
2,609

 
2,831

 
3,005

 
3,422

Analysis of changes in foreclosed assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, beginning of period
$
2,609

 
2,831

 
3,005

 
3,422

 
3,937

Net change in government insured/guaranteed (1)
(210
)
 
(158
)
 
(117
)
 
(352
)
 
(484
)
Additions to foreclosed assets (2)
356

 
362

 
364

 
421

 
448

Reductions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sales
(451
)
 
(462
)
 
(421
)
 
(493
)
 
(490
)
Write-downs and gains (losses) on sales
25

 
36

 

 
7

 
11

Total reductions
(426
)
 
(426
)
 
(421
)
 
(486
)
 
(479
)
Balance, end of period
$
2,329

 
2,609

 
2,831

 
3,005

 
3,422

(1)
Foreclosed government insured/guaranteed loans are temporarily transferred to and held by us as servicer, until reimbursement is received from FHA or VA. The net change in government insured/guaranteed foreclosed assets is made up of inflows from mortgages held for investment and MHFS, and outflows when we are reimbursed by FHA/VA. Transfers from government insured/guaranteed loans to foreclosed assets amounted to $49 million, $45 million, $41 million, $43 million and $62 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and December 31, September 30, June 30, and March 31, 2014, respectively.
(2)
Predominantly include loans moved into foreclosure from nonaccrual status, PCI loans transitioned directly to foreclosed assets and repossessed automobiles.
Foreclosed assets at March 31, 2015, included $1.4 billion of foreclosed residential real estate that had collateralized commercial and consumer loans, of which 54% is predominantly FHA insured or VA guaranteed and expected to have minimal or no loss content. The remaining foreclosed assets balance of $900 million has been written down to estimated net realizable value. Foreclosed assets at March 31, 2015, decreased slightly, compared with December 31, 2014. Of the $2.3 billion in foreclosed assets at March 31, 2015, 33% have been in the foreclosed assets portfolio one year or less.



34

Risk Management - Credit Risk Management (continued)

TROUBLED DEBT RESTRUCTURINGS (TDRs)

Table 26:  Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDRs)
(in millions)
Mar 31,
2015


Dec 31,
2014


Sep 30,
2014


Jun 30,
2014


Mar 31,
2014

Commercial TDRs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial and industrial
$
779

 
724

 
836

 
950

 
1,088

Real estate mortgage
1,838

 
1,880

 
2,034

 
2,179

 
2,233

Real estate construction
247

 
314

 
328

 
391

 
454

Lease financing
2

 
2

 
3

 
5

 
6

Total commercial TDRs
2,866

 
2,920

 
3,201

 
3,525

 
3,781

Consumer TDRs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
18,003

 
18,226

 
18,366

 
18,582

 
19,043

Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage
2,424

 
2,437

 
2,464

 
2,463

 
2,460

Credit Card
326

 
338

 
358

 
379

 
399

Automobile
124

 
127

 
135

 
151

 
169

Other revolving credit and installment
54

 
49

 
45

 
38

 
34

Trial modifications
432

 
452

 
473

 
469

 
593

Total consumer TDRs (1)
21,363

 
21,629

 
21,841

 
22,082

 
22,698

Total TDRs
$
24,229

 
24,549

 
25,042

 
25,607

 
26,479

TDRs on nonaccrual status
$
6,982

 
7,104

 
7,313

 
7,638

 
7,774

TDRs on accrual status (1)
17,247

 
17,445

 
17,729

 
17,969

 
18,705

Total TDRs
$
24,229

 
24,549

 
25,042

 
25,607

 
26,479

(1)
TDR loans include $2.1 billion, $2.1 billion, $2.1 billion, $2.2 billion, and $2.6 billion at March 31, 2015, and December 31, September 30, June 30, and March 31, 2014, respectively, of government insured/guaranteed loans that are predominantly insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA and accruing.
 
Table 26 provides information regarding the recorded investment of loans modified in TDRs. The allowance for loan losses for TDRs was $3.4 billion and $3.6 billion at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. See Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information regarding TDRs. In those situations where principal is forgiven, the entire amount of such forgiveness is immediately charged off to the extent not done so prior to the modification. We sometimes delay the timing on the repayment of a portion of principal (principal forbearance) and charge off the amount of forbearance if that amount is not considered fully collectible.
For more information on our nonaccrual policies when a restructuring is involved, see the "Risk Management - Credit Risk Management - Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDRs)" section of our 2014 Form 10-K.
 
Table 27 provides an analysis of the changes in TDRs. Loans modified more than once are reported as TDR inflows only in the period they are first modified. Other than resolutions such as foreclosures, sales and transfers to held for sale, we may remove loans held for investment from TDR classification, but only if they have been refinanced or restructured at market terms and qualify as a new loan.


35


Table 27:  Analysis of Changes in TDRs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Quarter ended
 
(in millions)
Mar 31,
2015

 
Dec 31,
2014

 
Sep 30,
2014

 
Jun 30,
2014

 
Mar 31,
2014

Commercial TDRs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, beginning of quarter
$
2,920

 
3,201

 
3,525

 
3,781

 
3,765

Inflows (1)
310

 
232

 
208

 
276

 
442

Outflows
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Charge-offs
(26
)
 
(62
)
 
(42
)
 
(28
)
 
(23
)
Foreclosures
(11
)
 
(27
)
 
(12
)
 
(8
)
 
(3
)
Payments, sales and other (2)
(327
)
 
(424
)
 
(478
)
 
(496
)
 
(400
)
Balance, end of quarter
2,866

 
2,920

 
3,201

 
3,525

 
3,781

Consumer TDRs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, beginning of quarter
21,629

 
21,841

 
22,082

 
22,698

 
22,696

Inflows (1)
755

 
957

 
946

 
1,003

 
1,104

Outflows
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Charge-offs
(88
)
 
(99
)
 
(120
)
 
(139
)
 
(157
)
Foreclosures
(245
)
 
(252
)
 
(303
)
 
(283
)
 
(325
)
Payments, sales and other (2)
(668
)
 
(797
)
 
(768
)
 
(1,073
)
 
(563
)
Net change in trial modifications (3)
(20
)
 
(21
)
 
4

 
(124
)
 
(57
)
Balance, end of quarter
21,363

 
21,629

 
21,841

 
22,082

 
22,698

Total TDRs
$
24,229

 
24,549

 
25,042

 
25,607

 
26,479

(1)
Inflows include loans that both modify and resolve within the period as well as advances on loans that modified in a prior period.
(2)
Other outflows include normal amortization/accretion of loan basis adjustments and loans transferred to held-for-sale. It also includes $1 million of loans refinanced or restructured as new loans and removed from TDR classification for the quarter ended March 31, 2014. No loans were removed from TDR classification for the quarters ended March 31, 2015, and December 31, September 30 and June 30, 2014, as a result of being refinanced or restructured as new loans.
(3)
Net change in trial modifications includes: inflows of new TDRs entering the trial payment period, net of outflows for modifications that either (i) successfully perform and enter into a permanent modification, or (ii) did not successfully perform according to the terms of the trial period plan and are subsequently charged-off, foreclosed upon or otherwise resolved. Our experience is that substantially all of the mortgages that enter a trial payment period program are successful in completing the program requirements.


36

Risk Management - Credit Risk Management (continued)

LOANS 90 DAYS OR MORE PAST DUE AND STILL ACCRUING
Loans 90 days or more past due as to interest or principal are still accruing if they are (1) well-secured and in the process of collection or (2) real estate 1-4 family mortgage loans or consumer loans exempt under regulatory rules from being classified as nonaccrual until later delinquency, usually 120 days past due. PCI loans are not included in past due and still accruing loans even though they are 90 days or more contractually past due. These PCI loans are considered to be accruing because they continue to earn interest from accretable yield, independent of performance in accordance with their contractual terms.
Excluding insured/guaranteed loans, loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing at March 31, 2015, were down $79 million, or 9%, from December 31, 2014, due to payoffs, modifications and other loss mitigation activities, declines in non-strategic and liquidating portfolios, and credit stabilization.
 
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing whose repayments are predominantly insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA for mortgages and the U.S. Department of Education for student loans under the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) were $15.5 billion at March 31, 2015, down from $16.9 billion at December 31, 2014, due to seasonally lower delinquencies.
Table 28 reflects non-PCI loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing by class for loans not government insured/guaranteed. For additional information on delinquencies by loan class, see Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.

Table 28:  Loans 90 Days or More Past Due and Still Accruing
(in millions)
Mar 31, 2015

 
Dec 31, 2014

 
Sep 30, 2014

 
Jun 30, 2014

 
Mar 31, 2014

Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total (excluding PCI (1)):
$
16,344

 
17,810

 
18,295

 
18,582

 
21,215

Less: FHA insured/VA guaranteed (2)(3)
15,453

 
16,827

 
16,628

 
16,978

 
19,405

Less: Student loans guaranteed under the FFELP (4)
50

 
63

 
721

 
707

 
860

Total, not government insured/guaranteed
$
841

 
920

 
946

 
897

 
950

By segment and class, not government insured/guaranteed:
Commercial:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial and industrial
$
31

 
31

 
35

 
52

 
12

Real estate mortgage
43

 
16

 
37

 
53

 
13

Real estate construction

 

 
18

 
16

 
69

Total commercial
74


47


90


121


94

Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage (3)
221

 
260

 
327

 
311

 
333

Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage (3)
55

 
83

 
78

 
70

 
88

Credit card
352

 
364

 
302

 
266

 
308

Automobile
47

 
73

 
64

 
48

 
41

Other revolving credit and installment
92

 
93

 
85

 
81

 
86

Total consumer
767

 
873


856


776


856

Total, not government insured/guaranteed
$
841

 
920


946


897


950

(1)
PCI loans totaled $3.6 billion, $3.7 billion, $4.0 billion, $4.0 billion, and $4.3 billion at March 31, 2015 and December 31, September 30, June 30, and March 31, 2014, respectively.
(2)
Represents loans whose repayments are predominantly insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA.
(3)
Includes mortgages held for sale 90 days or more past due and still accruing.
(4)
Represents loans whose repayments are predominantly guaranteed by agencies on behalf of the U.S. Department of Education under the FFELP. In fourth quarter 2014, substantially all government guaranteed loans were sold.



37


NET CHARGE-OFFS
Table 29:  Net Charge-offs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Quarter ended 
 
 
Mar 31, 2015
 
 
Dec 31, 2014
 
 
Sep 30, 2014
 
 
Jun 30, 2014
 
 
Mar 31, 2014
 
($ in millions)
Net loan
charge-
offs

 
% of 
avg. 
loans(1) 

 
Net loan
charge-
offs

 
% of  
avg.  
loans (1)

 
Net loan
charge
offs

 
% of avg. loans (1)

 
Net loan
charge-offs

 
% of
avg. loans (1)

 
Net loan
charge-offs

 
% of
avg.
loans (1)

Commercial:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial and industrial
$
64

 
0.10
 %
 
$
82

 
0.12
 %
 
$
67

 
0.11
 %
 
$
60

 
0.10
 %
 
$
49

 
0.08
 %
Real estate mortgage
(11
)
 
(0.04
)
 
(25
)
 
(0.09
)
 
(37
)
 
(0.13
)
 
(10
)
 
(0.04
)
 
(22
)
 
(0.08
)
Real estate construction
(9
)
 
(0.19
)
 
(26
)
 
(0.56
)
 
(58
)
 
(1.27
)
 
(20
)
 
(0.47
)
 
(23
)
 
(0.54
)
Lease financing

 

 
1

 
0.05

 
4

 
0.10

 
1

 
0.05

 
1

 
0.03

Total commercial
44

 
0.04

 
32

 
0.03

 
(24
)
 
(0.02
)
 
31

 
0.03

 
5

 
0.01

Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate 1-4 family
first mortgage
83

 
0.13

 
88

 
0.13

 
114

 
0.17

 
137

 
0.21

 
170

 
0.27

Real estate 1-4 family
junior lien mortgage
123

 
0.85

 
134

 
0.88

 
140

 
0.90

 
160

 
1.02

 
192

 
1.19

Credit card
239

 
3.19

 
221

 
2.97

 
201

 
2.87

 
211

 
3.20

 
231

 
3.57

Automobile
101

 
0.73

 
132

 
0.94

 
112

 
0.81

 
46

 
0.35

 
90

 
0.70

Other revolving credit and
installment
118

 
1.32

 
128

 
1.45

 
125

 
1.46

 
132

 
1.22

 
137

 
1.29

Total consumer
664

 
0.60

 
703

 
0.63

 
692

 
0.62

 
686

 
0.62

 
820

 
0.75

Total
$
708

 
0.33
 %
 
$
735

 
0.34
 %
 
$
668

 
0.32
 %
 
$
717

 
0.35
 %
 
$
825

 
0.41
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Quarterly net charge-offs (recoveries) as a percentage of average respective loans are annualized.

Table 29 presents net charge-offs for first quarter 2015 and the previous four quarters. Net charge-offs in first quarter 2015 were $708 million (0.33% of average total loans outstanding) compared with $825 million (0.41%) in first quarter 2014.
Due to higher dollar amounts associated with individual commercial and industrial and CRE loans, loss recognition tends to be irregular and varies more, compared with consumer loan portfolios. We continued to have improvement in our residential real estate secured portfolios.

ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES  The allowance for credit losses, which consists of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded credit commitments, is management’s estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio and unfunded credit commitments at the balance sheet date, excluding loans carried at fair value. The detail of the changes in the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment (including charge-offs and recoveries by loan class) is in Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
We apply a disciplined process and methodology to establish our allowance for credit losses each quarter. This process takes into consideration many factors, including historical and forecasted loss trends, loan-level credit quality ratings and loan grade-specific characteristics. The process involves subjective and complex judgments. In addition, we review a variety of credit metrics and trends. These credit metrics and trends, however, do not solely determine the amount of the allowance as we use several analytical tools. Our estimation approach for the commercial portfolio reflects the estimated probability of default in accordance with the borrower’s financial strength, and the severity of loss in the event of default, considering the quality of any underlying collateral. Probability of default and severity at the time of default are statistically derived through historical observations of defaults and losses after default within each
 
credit risk rating. Our estimation approach for the consumer portfolio uses forecasted losses that represent our best estimate of inherent loss based on historical experience, quantitative and other mathematical techniques over the loss emergence period. For additional information on our allowance for credit losses, see the “Critical Accounting Policies – Allowance for Credit Losses” section in our 2014 Form 10-K and Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Table 30 presents the allocation of the allowance for credit losses by loan segment and class for the most recent quarter end and last four year ends.


38

Risk Management - Credit Risk Management (continued)

Table 30:  Allocation of the Allowance for Credit Losses (ACL)
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
December 31, 2011
 
(in millions)
ACL

 
Loans
as %
of total
loans

 
ACL

 
Loans
as %
of total
loans

 
ACL

 
Loans
as %
of total
loans

 
ACL

 
Loans
as %
of total
loans

 
ACL

 
Loans
as %
of total
loans

Commercial:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial and industrial
$
3,610

 
32
%
 
$
3,506

 
32
%
 
$
3,040

 
29
%
 
$
2,789

 
28
%
 
$
2,810

 
27
%
Real estate mortgage
1,388

 
13

 
1,576

 
13

 
2,157

 
14

 
2,284

 
13

 
2,570

 
14

Real estate construction
1,158

 
2

 
1,097

 
2

 
775

 
2

 
552

 
2

 
893

 
2

Lease financing
177

 
1

 
198

 
1

 
131

 
1

 
89

 
2

 
85

 
2

Total commercial
6,333

 
48

 
6,377

 
48

 
6,103

 
46

 
5,714

 
45

 
6,358

 
45

Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
2,583

 
31

 
2,878

 
31

 
4,087

 
32

 
6,100

 
31

 
6,934

 
30

Real estate 1-4 family
junior lien mortgage
1,673

 
7

 
1,566

 
7

 
2,534

 
8

 
3,462

 
10

 
3,897

 
11

Credit card
1,274

 
3

 
1,271

 
4

 
1,224

 
3

 
1,234

 
3

 
1,294

 
3

Automobile
548

 
7

 
516

 
6

 
475

 
6

 
417

 
6

 
555

 
6

Other revolving credit and installment
602

 
4

 
561

 
4

 
548

 
5

 
550

 
5

 
630

 
5

Total consumer
6,680

 
52

 
6,792

 
52

 
8,868

 
54

 
11,763

 
55

 
13,310

 
55

Total
$
13,013

 
100
%
 
$
13,169

 
100
%
 
$
14,971

 
100
%
 
$
17,477

 
100
%
 
$
19,668

 
100
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
December 31, 2011
 
Components:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for loan losses
$
12,176
 
 
12,319
 
 
14,502
 
 
17,060
 
 
19,372
 
Allowance for unfunded
credit commitments
837
 
 
850
 
 
469
 
 
417
 
 
296
 
Allowance for credit losses
$
13,013
 
 
13,169
 
 
14,971
 
 
17,477
 
 
19,668
 
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans
1.41
%
 
1.43
 
 
1.76
 
 
2.13
 
 
2.52
 
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total net charge-offs (1)
424
 
 
418
 
 
322
 
 
189
 
 
171
 
Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans
1.51
 
 
1.53
 
 
1.82
 
 
2.19
 
 
2.56
 
Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total nonaccrual loans
104
 
 
103
 
 
96
 
 
85
 
 
92
 
(1)
Total net charge-offs are annualized for quarter ended March 31, 2015.

In addition to the allowance for credit losses, there was $2.9 billion at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, of nonaccretable difference to absorb losses for PCI loans. The allowance for credit losses is lower than otherwise would have been required without PCI loan accounting. As a result of PCI loans, certain ratios of the Company may not be directly comparable with credit-related metrics for other financial institutions. For additional information on PCI loans, see the “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management – Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans” section and Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
The ratio of the allowance for credit losses to total nonaccrual loans may fluctuate significantly from period to period due to such factors as the mix of loan types in the portfolio, borrower credit strength and the value and marketability of collateral. Over one-half of nonaccrual loans were real estate 1-4 family first and junior lien mortgage loans at March 31, 2015.
The allowance for credit losses declined in first quarter 2015, which reflected continued credit improvement, particularly in residential real estate portfolios and primarily associated with continued improvement in the housing market. Total provision
 
for credit losses was $608 million in first quarter 2015, compared with $325 million in first quarter 2014.
We believe the allowance for credit losses of $13.0 billion at March 31, 2015, was appropriate to cover credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio, including unfunded credit commitments, at that date. The allowance for credit losses is subject to change and reflects existing factors as of the date of determination, including economic or market conditions and ongoing internal and external examination processes. Due to the sensitivity of the allowance for credit losses to changes in the economic and business environment, it is possible that we will incur incremental credit losses not anticipated as of the balance sheet date. Future allowance levels may increase or decrease based on a variety of factors, including loan growth, portfolio performance and general economic conditions. Our process for determining the allowance for credit losses is discussed in the “Critical Accounting Policies – Allowance for Credit Losses” section and Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K.



39


LIABILITY FOR MORTGAGE LOAN REPURCHASE LOSSES 
In connection with our sales and securitization of residential mortgage loans to various parties, we have established a mortgage repurchase liability, initially at fair value, related to various representations and warranties that reflect management’s estimate of losses for loans for which we could have a repurchase obligation, whether or not we currently service those loans, based on a combination of factors. Our mortgage repurchase liability estimation process also incorporates a forecast of repurchase demands associated with mortgage insurance rescission activity.
Because we retain the servicing for most of the mortgage loans we sell or securitize, we believe the quality of our residential mortgage loan servicing portfolio provides helpful information in evaluating our repurchase liability. Of the $1.7 trillion in the residential mortgage loan servicing portfolio at March 31, 2015,
 
95% was current and less than 2% was subprime at origination. Our combined delinquency and foreclosure rate on this portfolio was 5.05% at March 31, 2015, compared with 5.79% at December 31, 2014. Three percent of this portfolio is private label securitizations for which we originated the loans and therefore have some repurchase risk.
The overall level of unresolved repurchase demands and mortgage insurance rescissions outstanding at March 31, 2015, was down from a year ago both in number of outstanding loans and in total dollar balances as we continued to work through the new demands and mortgage insurance rescissions.
Table 31 provides the number of unresolved repurchase demands and mortgage insurance rescissions.

Table 31:  Unresolved Repurchase Demands and Mortgage Insurance Rescissions
 
Government
sponsored entities
 
 
Private
 
 
Mortgage insurance
rescissions with no demand (1)
 
 
Total
 
($ in millions)
Number of
loans

 
Original loan
balance (2)

 
Number of
loans

 
Original loan
balance (2)

 
Number of
loans

 
Original loan
balance (2)

 
Number of
loans

 
Original loan
balance (2)

2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31,
526

 
$
118

 
161

 
$
29

 
108

 
$
28

 
795

 
$
175

2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31,
546

 
118

 
173

 
34

 
120

 
31

 
839

 
183

September 30,
426

 
93

 
322

 
75

 
233

 
52

 
981

 
220

June 30,
678

 
149

 
362

 
80

 
305

 
66

 
1,345

 
295

March 31,
599

 
126

 
391

 
89

 
409

 
90

 
1,399

 
305

(1)
As part of our representations and warranties in our loan sales contracts, we typically represent to GSEs and private investors that certain loans have mortgage insurance to the extent there are loans that have loan to value ratios in excess of 80% that require mortgage insurance. If the mortgage insurance is rescinded by the mortgage insurer due to a claim of breach of a contractual representation or warranty, the lack of insurance may result in a repurchase demand from an investor. Similar to repurchase demands, we evaluate mortgage insurance rescission notices for validity and appeal for reinstatement if the rescission was not based on a contractual breach. When investor demands are received due to lack of mortgage insurance, they are reported as unresolved repurchase demands based on the applicable investor category for the loan (GSE or private).
(2)
While the original loan balances related to these demands are presented above, the establishment of the repurchase liability is based on a combination of factors, such as our appeals success rates, reimbursement by correspondent and other third party originators, and projected loss severity, which is driven by the difference between the current loan balance and the estimated collateral value less costs to sell the property.

Table 32 summarizes the changes in our mortgage repurchase liability.

Table 32:  Changes in Mortgage Repurchase Liability
 
Quarter ended
 
(in millions)
Mar 31,
2015

 
Dec 31,
2014

 
Sep 30,
2014

 
Jun 30,
2014

 
Mar 31,
2014

Balance, beginning of period
$
615

 
669

 
766

 
799

 
899

Provision for repurchase losses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loan sales
10

 
10

 
12

 
12

 
10

Change in estimate (1)
(26
)
 
(49
)
 
(93
)
 
(38
)
 
(4
)
Total additions (reductions)
(16
)
 
(39
)
 
(81
)
 
(26
)
 
6

Losses
(13
)
 
(15
)
 
(16
)
 
(7
)
 
(106
)
Balance, end of period
$
586

 
615

 
669

 
766

 
799

(1)
Results from changes in investor demand, mortgage insurer practices, credit and the financial stability of correspondent lenders.

Our liability for mortgage repurchases, included in “Accrued expenses and other liabilities” in our consolidated balance sheet, represents our best estimate of the probable loss that we expect to incur for various representations and warranties in the contractual provisions of our sales of mortgage loans. The liability was $586 million at March 31, 2015 and $799 million at March 31, 2014. In first quarter 2015, we released $16 million, which increased net gains on mortgage loan origination/sales activities, compared with a provision of $6 million in first quarter 2014. The release in first quarter 2015 was primarily due
 
to a re-estimation of our liability based on recently observed trends.
Total losses charged to the repurchase liability were $13 million in first quarter 2015, compared with $106 million a year ago. The higher losses charged in first quarter 2014 were primarily attributable to settlements with two private investors.
Because of the uncertainty in the various estimates underlying the mortgage repurchase liability, there is a range of losses in excess of the recorded mortgage repurchase liability that are reasonably possible. The estimate of the range of possible loss


40

Risk Management - Credit Risk Management (continued)

for representations and warranties does not represent a probable loss, and is based on currently available information, significant judgment, and a number of assumptions that are subject to change. The high end of this range of reasonably possible losses in excess of our recorded liability was $936 million at March 31, 2015, and was determined based upon modifying the assumptions (particularly to assume significant changes in investor repurchase demand practices) used in our best estimate of probable loss to reflect what we believe to be the high end of reasonably possible adverse assumptions.
For additional information on our repurchase liability, see the “Risk Management –Credit Risk Management –Liability For Mortgage Loan Repurchase Losses” section in our 2014 Form 10-K and Note 8 (Mortgage Banking Activities) to Financial Statements in this Report.

RISKS RELATING TO SERVICING ACTIVITIES In addition to servicing loans in our portfolio, we act as servicer and/or master servicer of residential mortgage loans included in GSE-guaranteed mortgage securitizations, GNMA-guaranteed mortgage securitizations of FHA-insured/VA-guaranteed mortgages and private label mortgage securitizations, as well as for unsecuritized loans owned by institutional investors.
In connection with our servicing activities we have entered into various settlements with federal and state regulators to resolve certain alleged servicing issues and practices. In general, these settlements required us to provide customers with loan modification relief, refinancing relief, and foreclosure prevention and assistance, as well as imposed certain monetary penalties on us.
 
In particular, on February 28, 2013, we entered into amendments to an April 2011 Consent Order with both the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the FRB, which effectively ceased the Independent Foreclosure Review program created by such Consent Order and replaced it with an accelerated remediation commitment to provide foreclosure prevention actions on $1.2 billion of residential mortgage loans, subject to a process to be administered by the OCC and the FRB. During 2014, we believe we reported sufficient foreclosure prevention actions to the monitor of the accelerated remediation process to meet the $1.2 billion commitment, but are awaiting confirmation of the monitor's approval by the OCC.
For additional information about the risks and various settlements related to our servicing activities, see “Risk Management - Credit Risk Management - Risks Relating to Servicing Activities” in our 2014 Form 10-K.


41


Asset/Liability Management
Asset/liability management involves evaluating, monitoring and managing interest rate risk, market risk, liquidity and funding. Primary oversight of interest rate risk and market risk resides with the Finance Committee of our Board of Directors (Board), which oversees the administration and effectiveness of financial risk management policies and processes used to assess and manage these risks. Primary oversight of liquidity and funding resides with the Risk Committee of the Board. At the management level we utilize a Corporate Asset/Liability Management Committee (Corporate ALCO), which consists of senior financial, risk, and business executives, to oversee these risks and report on them periodically to the Board’s Finance Committee and Risk Committee as appropriate. Each of our principal lines of business has its own asset/liability management committee and process linked to the Corporate ALCO process. As discussed in more detail for trading activities below, we employ separate management level oversight specific to market risk. Market risk, in its broadest sense, refers to the possibility that losses will result from the impact of adverse changes in market rates and prices on our trading and non-trading portfolios and financial instruments.
 
INTEREST RATE RISK Interest rate risk, which potentially can have a significant earnings impact, is an integral part of being a financial intermediary. We are subject to interest rate risk because:
assets and liabilities may mature or reprice at different times (for example, if assets reprice faster than liabilities and interest rates are generally falling, earnings will initially decline);
assets and liabilities may reprice at the same time but by different amounts (for example, when the general level of interest rates is falling, we may reduce rates paid on checking and savings deposit accounts by an amount that is less than the general decline in market interest rates);
short-term and long-term market interest rates may change by different amounts (for example, the shape of the yield curve may affect new loan yields and funding costs differently);
the remaining maturity of various assets or liabilities may shorten or lengthen as interest rates change (for example, if long-term mortgage interest rates decline sharply, MBS held in the investment securities portfolio may prepay significantly earlier than anticipated, which could reduce portfolio income); or
interest rates may also have a direct or indirect effect on loan demand, collateral values, credit losses, mortgage origination volume, the fair value of MSRs and other financial instruments, the value of the pension liability and other items affecting earnings.
 
We assess interest rate risk by comparing outcomes under various earnings simulations using many interest rate scenarios that differ in the direction of interest rate changes, the degree of change over time, the speed of change and the projected shape of the yield curve. These simulations require assumptions regarding how changes in interest rates and related market conditions could influence drivers of earnings and balance sheet composition such as loan origination demand, prepayment speeds, deposit balances and mix, as well as pricing strategies.
Our risk measures include both net interest income sensitivity and interest rate sensitive noninterest income and expense impacts. We refer to the combination of these exposures as interest rate sensitive earnings. In general, the Company is
 
positioned to benefit from higher interest rates. Currently, our profile is such that net interest income will benefit from higher interest rates as our assets reprice faster and to a greater degree than our liabilities, and, in response to lower market rates, our assets will reprice downward and to a greater degree than our liabilities. Our interest rate sensitive noninterest income and expense is largely driven by mortgage activity, and tends to move in the opposite direction of our net interest income. So, in response to higher interest rates, mortgage activity, primarily refinancing activity, generally declines. And in response to lower rates, mortgage activity generally increases. Mortgage results in our simulations are also impacted by the valuation of MSRs and related hedge positions. See the “Risk Management – Mortgage Banking Interest Rate and Market Risk” section in this Report for more information.
The degree to which these sensitivities offset each other is dependent upon the timing and magnitude of changes in interest rates, and the slope of the yield curve. During a transition to a higher or lower interest rate environment, a reduction or increase in interest-sensitive earnings from the mortgage banking business could occur quickly, while the benefit or detriment from balance sheet repricing could take more time to develop. For example, our lower rate scenarios (scenario 1 and scenario 2) in the following table initially measure a decline in long-term interest rates versus our most likely scenario. Although the performance in these rate scenarios contain initial benefit from increased mortgage banking activity, the result is lower earnings relative to the most likely scenario over time given pressure on net interest income. The higher rate scenarios (scenario 3 and scenario 4) measure the impact of varying degrees of rising short-term and long-term interest rates over the course of the forecast horizon relative to the most likely scenario, both resulting in positive earnings sensitivity.
As of March 31, 2015, our most recent simulations estimate earnings at risk over the next 24 months under a range of both lower and higher interest rates. The results of the simulations are summarized in Table 33, indicating cumulative net income after tax earnings sensitivity relative to the most likely earnings plan over the 24 month horizon (a positive range indicates a beneficial earnings sensitivity measurement relative to the most likely earnings plan and a negative range indicates a detrimental earnings sensitivity relative to the most likely earnings plan). 


42

Asset/Liability Management (continued)

Table 33:  Earnings Sensitivity Over 24 Month Horizon Relative to Most Likely Earnings Plan
 
Most

Lower rates
 
Higher rates
 
likely

Scenario 1
Scenario 2
 
Scenario 3
 
Scenario 4
Ending rates:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal funds
2.10
%
0.25
1.87
 
2.36
 
5.00
10-year treasury (1)
3.68

1.80
3.18
 
4.18
 
5.95
Earnings relative to most likely
N/A

(2)-(3)%
(1)-(2)
 
0 - 5
 
>5
(1)
U.S. Constant Maturity Treasury Rate

We use the investment securities portfolio and exchange-traded and over-the-counter (OTC) interest rate derivatives to hedge our interest rate exposures. See the “Balance Sheet Analysis – Investment Securities” section in this Report for more information on the use of the available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities portfolios. The notional or contractual amount, credit risk amount and fair value of the derivatives used to hedge our interest rate risk exposures as of March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, are presented in Note 12 (Derivatives) to Financial Statements in this Report. We use derivatives for asset/liability management in two main ways:
to convert the cash flows from selected asset and/or liability instruments/portfolios including a major portion of our long-term debt, from fixed-rate payments to floating-rate payments, or vice versa; and
to economically hedge our mortgage origination pipeline, funded mortgage loans and MSRs using interest rate swaps, swaptions, futures, forwards and options.
 
MORTAGE BANKING INTEREST RATE AND MARKET RISK  We originate, fund and service mortgage loans, which subjects us to various risks, including credit, liquidity and interest rate risks. For a discussion of mortgage banking interest rate and market risk, see pages 87-89 of our 2014 Form 10-K.
While our hedging activities are designed to balance our mortgage banking interest rate risks, the financial instruments we use may not perfectly correlate with the values and income being hedged. For example, the change in the value of ARM production held for sale from changes in mortgage interest rates may or may not be fully offset by Treasury and LIBOR index-based financial instruments used as economic hedges for such ARMs. Additionally, hedge-carry income on our economic hedges for the MSRs may not continue if the spread between short-term and long-term rates decreases, we shift composition of the hedge to more interest rate swaps, or there are other changes in the market for mortgage forwards that affect the implied carry.
The total carrying value of our residential and commercial MSRs was $13.0 billion at March 31, 2015, and $14.0 billion at December 31, 2014. The weighted-average note rate on our portfolio of loans serviced for others was 4.43% at March 31, 2015, and 4.45% at December 31, 2014. The carrying value of our total MSRs represented 0.71% of mortgage loans serviced for others at March 31, 2015, and 0.75% at December 31, 2014.
 
 
MARKET RISK - TRADING ACTIVITIES  The Finance Committee of our Board of Directors reviews the acceptable market risk appetite for our trading activities. We engage in trading activities primarily to accommodate the investment and risk management activities of our customers (which involves transactions that are recorded as trading assets and liabilities on our balance sheet), to execute economic hedging to manage certain balance sheet risks and, to a very limited degree, for proprietary trading for our own account. These activities primarily occur within our Wholesale businesses and to a lesser extent other divisions of the Company. All of our trading assets and liabilities, including securities, foreign exchange transactions, commodity transactions, and derivatives are carried at fair value. Income earned related to these trading activities include net interest income and changes in fair value related to trading assets and liabilities. Net interest income earned on trading assets and liabilities is reflected in the interest income and interest expense components of our income statement. Changes in fair value of trading assets and liabilities are reflected in net gains on trading activities, a component of noninterest income in our income statement.
Table 34 presents total revenue from trading activities.

Table 34:  Income from Trading Activities
 
Quarter ended March 31,
 
(in millions)
 
2015

 
2014

Interest income (1)
 
$
445

 
374

Less: Interest expense (2)
 
97

 
87

Net interest income
 
348

 
287

Noninterest income:
 
 
 
 
Net gains from trading activities (3):
 
 
 
 
Customer accommodation
 
297

 
360

Economic hedges and other (4)
 
111

 
66

Proprietary trading
 

 
6

Total net trading gains
 
408

 
432

Total trading-related net interest and noninterest income
 
$
756

 
719

(1)
Represents interest and dividend income earned on trading securities.
(2)
Represents interest and dividend expense incurred on trading securities we have sold but have not yet purchased.
(3)
Represents realized gains (losses) from our trading activity and unrealized gains (losses) due to changes in fair value of our trading positions, attributable to the type of business activity.
(4)
Excludes economic hedging of mortgage banking and asset/liability management activities, for which hedge results (realized and unrealized) are reported with the respective hedged activities.
Customer accommodation  Customer accommodation activities are conducted to help customers manage their investment and risk management needs. We engage in market-making activities or act as an intermediary to purchase or sell financial instruments in anticipation of or in response to customer needs. This category also includes positions we use to manage our exposure to customer transactions.
For the majority of our customer accommodation trading, we serve as intermediary between buyer and seller. For example, we may purchase or sell a derivative to a customer who wants to manage interest rate risk exposure. We typically enter into offsetting derivative or security positions with a separate counterparty or exchange to manage our exposure to the derivative with our customer. We earn income on this activity based on the transaction price difference between the customer and offsetting derivative or security positions, which is reflected in the fair value changes of the positions recorded in net gains on trading activities.


43


Customer accommodation trading also includes net gains related to market-making activities in which we take positions to facilitate customer order flow. For example, we may own securities recorded as trading assets (long positions) or sold securities we have not yet purchased, recorded as trading liabilities (short positions), typically on a short-term basis, to facilitate support of buying and selling demand from our customers. As a market maker in these securities, we earn income due to: (1) the difference between the price paid or received for the purchase and sale of the security (bid-ask spread), (2) the net interest income, and (3) the change in fair value of the long or short positions during the short-term period held on our balance sheet. Additionally, we may enter into separate derivative or security positions to manage our exposure related to our long or short security positions. Income earned on this type of market-making activity is reflected in the fair value changes of these positions recorded in net gains on trading activities.

Economic hedges and other  Economic hedges in trading are not designated in a hedge accounting relationship and exclude economic hedging related to our asset/liability risk management and substantially all mortgage banking risk management activities. Economic hedging activities include the use of trading securities to economically hedge risk exposures related to non-trading activities or derivatives to hedge risk exposures related to trading assets or trading liabilities. Economic hedges are unrelated to our customer accommodation activities. Other activities include financial assets held for investment purposes that we elected to carry at fair value with changes in fair value recorded to earnings in order to mitigate accounting measurement mismatches or avoid embedded derivative accounting complexities.
 
Proprietary trading  Proprietary trading consists of security or derivative positions executed for our own account based upon market expectations or to benefit from price differences between financial instruments and markets. Proprietary trading activity has been substantially restricted by the Dodd-Frank Act provisions known as the “Volcker Rule.” Accordingly, we reduced and have exited certain business activities in anticipation of the rule’s compliance date. As discussed within this section and the noninterest income section of our financial results, proprietary trading activity is insignificant to our business and financial results. For more details on the Volcker Rule, see the “Regulatory Reform” section in our 2014 Form 10-K.
 
Daily Trading-Related Revenue  Table 35 provides information on the distribution of daily trading-related revenues for the Company’s trading portfolio. This trading-related revenue is defined as the change in value of the trading assets and trading liabilities, trading-related net interest income, and trading-related intra-day gains and losses. Net trading-related revenue does not include activity related to long-term positions held for economic hedging purposes, period-end adjustments, and other activity not representative of daily price changes driven by market factors.


44

Asset/Liability Management (continued)

Table 35:  Distribution of Daily Trading-Related Revenues 

Market risk is the risk of adverse changes in the fair value of the trading portfolios and financial instruments held by the Company due to changes in market risk factors such as interest rates, credit spreads, foreign exchange rates, equity, and commodity prices. Market risk is intrinsic to the Company’s sales and trading, market making, investing, and risk management activities.
The Company uses Value-at-Risk (VaR) metrics complemented with sensitivity analysis and stress testing in measuring and monitoring market risk. These market risk measures are monitored at both the business unit level and at aggregated levels on a daily basis. Our corporate market risk management function aggregates and monitors all exposures to ensure risk measures are within our established risk appetite. Changes to the market risk profile are analyzed and reported on a daily basis. The Company monitors various market risk exposure measures from a variety of perspectives, which include line of business, product, risk type, and legal entity.
 
VaR is a statistical risk measure used to estimate the potential loss from adverse moves in the financial markets. The VaR measures assume that historical changes in market values (historical simulation analysis) are representative of the potential future outcomes and measure the expected loss over a given time interval (for example, 1 day or 10 days) within a given confidence level. Our historical simulation analysis approach uses historical observations of daily changes of each of the market risk factors from each trading day in the previous 12 months. The risk drivers of each market risk exposure are updated on a daily basis. We measure and report VaR for 1-day and 10-day holding periods at a 99% confidence level. This means that we would expect to incur single day losses greater than predicted by VaR estimates for the
 
measured positions one time in every 100 trading days. We treat data from all historical periods as equally relevant and consider using data for the previous 12 months as appropriate for determining VaR. We believe using a 12-month look back period helps ensure the Company’s VaR is responsive to current market conditions.
VaR measurement between different financial institutions is not readily comparable due to modeling and assumption differences from company to company. VaR measures are more useful when interpreted as an indication of trends rather than an absolute measure to be compared across financial institutions.
VaR models are subject to limitations which include, but are not limited to, the use of historical changes in market factors that may not accurately reflect future changes in market factors, and the inability to predict market liquidity in extreme market conditions. All limitations such as model inputs, model assumptions, and calculation methodology risk are monitored by the Corporate Market Risk Group and the Corporate Model Risk Group.
The VaR models measure exposure to the following categories:
credit risk – exposures from corporate credit spreads, asset-backed security spreads, and mortgage prepayments.
interest rate risk – exposures from changes in the level, slope, and curvature of interest rate curves and the volatility of interest rates.
equity risk – exposures to changes in equity prices and volatilities of single name, index, and basket exposures.
commodity risk – exposures to changes in commodity prices and volatilities.


45


foreign exchange risk – exposures to changes in foreign exchange rates and volatilities.

 VaR is the primary market risk management measure for the assets and liabilities classified as trading and is used as a supplemental analysis tool to monitor exposures classified as available for sale (AFS) and other exposures that we carry at fair value.
Trading VaR is the measure used to provide insight into the market risk exhibited by the Company’s trading positions. The Company calculates Trading VaR for risk management purposes
 
to establish line of business and Company-wide risk limits. Trading VaR is calculated based on all trading positions classified as trading assets or trading liabilities on our balance sheet.
Table 36 shows the results of the Company’s Trading General VaR by risk category. As presented in the table, average Trading General VaR was $18 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared with $21 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2014. The decrease was primarily driven by changes in portfolio composition.


Table 36:  Trading 1-Day 99% General VaR Risk Category
 
 
 
Quarter ended
 
 
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
(in millions)
Period
end

 
Average

 
Low

 
High

 
Period
end

 
Average

 
Low

 
High

Company Trading General VaR Risk Categories
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Credit
$
14

 
11

 
7

 
19

 
10

 
14

 
10

 
19

Interest rate
20

 
15

 
6

 
28

 
24

 
27

 
19

 
37

Equity
9

 
10

 
8

 
11

 
9

 
8

 
6

 
12

Commodity
1

 
1

 

 
2

 
1

 
1

 
1

 
2

Foreign exchange
1

 
1

 

 
1

 
1

 
1

 

 
1

Diversification benefit (1)
(27
)
 
(20
)
 
 
 
 
 
(23
)
 
(30
)
 
 
 
 
Company Trading General VaR
$
18

 
18

 
 
 
 
 
22

 
21

 
 
 
 
(1)
The period-end VaR was less than the sum of the VaR components described above, which is due to portfolio diversification. The diversification effect arises because the risks are not perfectly correlated causing a portfolio of positions to usually be less risky than the sum of the risks of the positions alone. The diversification benefit is not meaningful for low and high metrics since they may occur on different days.

Sensitivity Analysis  Given the inherent limitations of the VaR models, the Company uses other measures, including sensitivity analysis, to measure and monitor risk. Sensitivity analysis is the measure of exposure to a single risk factor, such as a 0.01% increase in interest rates or a 1% increase in equity prices. We conduct and monitor sensitivity on interest rates, credit spreads, volatility, equity, commodity, and foreign exchange exposure. Sensitivity analysis complements VaR as it provides an indication of risk relative to each factor irrespective of historical market moves.
 
Stress Testing  While VaR captures the risk of loss due to adverse changes in markets using recent historical market data, stress testing captures the Company’s exposure to extreme but low probability market movements. Stress scenarios estimate the risk of losses based on management’s assumptions of abnormal but severe market movements such as severe credit spread widening or a large decline in equity prices. These scenarios assume that the market moves happen instantaneously and no repositioning or hedging activity takes place to mitigate losses as events unfold (a conservative approach since experience demonstrates otherwise).
An inventory of scenarios is maintained representing both historical and hypothetical stress events that affect a broad range of market risk factors with varying degrees of correlation and differing time horizons. Hypothetical scenarios assess the impact of large movements in financial variables on portfolio values. Typical examples include a 100 basis point increase across the yield curve or a 10% decline in stock market indexes. Historical scenarios utilize an event-driven approach: the stress scenarios are based on plausible but rare events, and the analysis addresses how these events might affect the risk factors relevant to a portfolio.
 
The Company’s stress testing framework is also used in calculating results in support of the Federal Reserve Board’s Comprehensive Capital Analysis & Review (CCAR) and internal stress tests. Stress scenarios are regularly reviewed and updated to address potential market events or concerns. For more detail on the CCAR process, see the “Capital Management” section in this Report.
 
Regulatory Market Risk Capital  is based on U.S. regulatory agency risk-based capital regulations that are based on the Basel Committee Capital Accord of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Prior to January 1, 2013, U.S. banking regulators’ market risk capital requirements were subject to Basel I and thereafter based on Basel 2.5. Effective January 1, 2014, the Company must calculate regulatory capital based on the Basel III market risk capital rule, which integrated Basel 2.5, and requires banking organizations with significant trading activities to adjust their capital requirements to better account for the market risks of those activities based on comprehensive and risk sensitive methods and models. The market risk capital rule is intended to cover the risk of loss in value of covered positions due to changes in market conditions.
 
Composition of Material Portfolio of Covered Positions  The market risk capital rule substantially modified the determination of market risk risk-weighted assets (RWAs), and implemented a more risk-sensitive methodology for the risks inherent in certain “covered” trading positions. The positions that are “covered” by the market risk capital rule are generally a subset of our trading assets and trading liabilities, specifically those held by the Company for the purpose of short-term resale or with the intent of benefiting from actual or expected short-term price movements, or to lock in arbitrage profits. Positions excluded from market risk regulatory capital treatment are subject to the


46

Asset/Liability Management (continued)

credit risk capital rules applicable to the “non-covered” trading positions.
The material portfolio of the Company’s “covered” positions is predominantly concentrated in the trading assets and trading liabilities managed within Wholesale Banking where the substantial portion of market risk capital is required. Wholesale Banking engages in the fixed income, traded credit, foreign exchange, equities, and commodities markets businesses. Other business segments hold small additional trading positions covered under the market risk capital rule.

Regulatory Market Risk Capital Components  The capital required for market risk on the Company’s “covered” positions is determined by internally developed models or standardized specific risk charges. The market risk regulatory capital models are subject to internal model risk management and validation. The models are continuously monitored and enhanced in response to changes in market conditions, improvements in system capabilities, and changes in the Company’s market risk exposure. The Company is required to obtain and has received prior written approval from its regulators before using its
 
internally developed models to calculate the market risk capital charge.
Basel III prescribes various VaR measures in the determination of regulatory capital and RWAs. The Company uses the same VaR models for both market risk management purposes as well as regulatory capital calculations. For regulatory purposes, we use the following metrics to determine the Company’s market risk capital requirements:
 
General VaR measures the risk of broad market movements such as changes in the level of credit spreads, interest rates, equity prices, commodity prices, and foreign exchange rates. General VaR uses historical simulation analysis based on 99% confidence level and a 10-day time horizon.
Table 37 shows the General VaR measure categorized by major risk categories. Average 10-day Company Regulatory General VaR was $20 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared with $36 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2014. The decrease was primarily driven by changes in portfolio composition.

Table 37:  Regulatory 10-Day 99% General VaR by Risk Category
 
 
 
Quarter ended
 
 
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
(in millions)
Period
end

 
Average

 
Low

 
High

 
Period
end

 
Average

 
Low

 
High

Wholesale Regulatory General VaR Risk Categories
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Credit
$
30

 
33

 
23

 
42

 
34

 
45

 
34

 
52

Interest rate
56

 
50

 
26

 
94

 
66

 
68

 
48

 
96

Equity
11

 
10

 
4

 
19

 
9

 
10

 
4

 
16

Commodity
2

 
2

 
1

 
4

 
3

 
3

 
1

 
7

Foreign exchange
7

 
4

 
1

 
7

 
4

 
3

 
1

 
11

Diversification benefit (1)
(87
)
 
(79
)
 
 
 
 
 
(81
)
 
(92
)
 
 
 
 
Wholesale Regulatory General VaR
$
19

 
20

 
12

 
43

 
35

 
37

 
22

 
54

Company Regulatory General VaR
19

 
20

 
11

 
43

 
35

 
36

 
23

 
54

(1)
The period-end VaR was less than the sum of the VaR components described above, which is due to portfolio diversification. The diversification benefit arises because the risks are not perfectly correlated causing a portfolio of positions to usually be less risky than the sum of the risks of the positions alone. The diversification benefit is not meaningful for low and high metrics since they may occur on different days.

Specific Risk measures the risk of loss that could result from factors other than broad market movements, or name-specific market risk. Specific Risk uses Monte Carlo simulation analysis based on a 99% confidence level and a 10-day time horizon.
 
Total VaR (as presented in Table 38) is composed of General VaR and Specific Risk and uses the previous 12 months of historical market data to comply with regulatory requirements.

Total Stressed VaR (as presented in Table 38) uses a historical period of significant financial stress over a continuous 12 month period using historically available market data and is composed of Stressed General VaR and Stressed Specific Risk. Total Stressed VaR uses the same methodology and models as Total VaR. 

Incremental Risk Charge according to the market risk capital rule, must capture losses due to both issuer default and migration risk at the 99.9% confidence level over the one-year capital horizon under the assumption of constant level of risk or a constant position assumption. The model covers all non-securitized credit-sensitive products.
 
The Company calculates Incremental Risk by generating a portfolio loss distribution using Monte Carlo simulation, which assumes numerous scenarios, where an assumption is made that the portfolio’s composition remains constant for a one-year time horizon. Individual issuer credit grade migration and issuer default risk is modeled through generation of the issuer’s credit rating transition based upon statistical modeling. Correlation between credit grade migration and default is captured by a multifactor proprietary model which takes into account industry classifications as well as regional effects. Additionally, the impact of market and issuer specific concentrations is reflected in the modeling framework by assignment of a higher charge for portfolios that have increasing concentrations in particular issuers or sectors. Lastly, the model captures product basis risk; that is, it reflects the material disparity between a position and its hedge.
Table 38 provides information on Total VaR, Total Stressed VaR and the Incremental Risk Charge results for the quarter ended March 31, 2015. For the Incremental Risk Charge, the required capital for market risk at quarter end equals the quarter end results. 



47


Table 38:  Market Risk Regulatory Capital Modeled Components
 
Quarter ended March 31, 2015
 
 
March 31, 2015
 
(in millions)
Average

 
Low

 
High

 
Quarter end

 
Risk-
based
capital (1)

 
Risk-
weighted
assets (1)

Total VaR
$
49

 
44

 
58

 
53

 
147

 
1,836

Total Stressed VaR
347

 
255

 
543

 
301

 
1,041

 
13,009

Incremental Risk Charge
347

 
296

 
402

 
378

 
378

 
4,731

(1)
Results represent the risk-based capital and RWAs based on the VaR and Incremental Risk Charge models.

Securitized Products Charge  Basel III requires a separate market risk capital charge for positions classified as a securitization or re-securitization. The primary criteria for classification as a securitization are whether there is a transfer of risk and whether the credit risk associated with the underlying exposures has been separated into at least two tranches reflecting different levels of seniority. Covered trading securitizations positions include consumer and commercial asset-backed securities (ABS), commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS), residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS), and collateralized loan and other debt obligations (CLO/CDO) positions. The securitization capital requirements are the greater of the capital requirements of the net long or short exposure, and are capped at the maximum loss that could be incurred on any given transaction.
Table 39 shows the aggregate net fair market value of securities and derivative securitization positions by exposure type that meet the regulatory definition of a covered trading securitization position at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014.
Table 39: Covered Securitization Positions by Exposure Type (Market Value)
(in millions)
ABS

 
CMBS

 
RMBS

 
CLO/CDO

March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securitization exposure:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities
$
620

 
673

 
839

 
510

Derivatives
6

 
7

 
20

 
(31
)
Total
$
626

 
680

 
859

 
479

December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securitization exposure:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities
$
752

 
709

 
689

 
553

Derivatives
(1
)
 
5

 
23

 
(31
)
Total
$
751

 
714

 
712

 
522


SECURITIZATION DUE DILIGENCE AND RISK MONITORING The market risk capital rule requires that the Company conduct due diligence on the risk of each position within three days of the purchase of a securitization position. The Company’s due diligence on the creditworthiness of each position provides an understanding of the features that would materially affect the performance of a securitization or re-securitization. The due diligence analysis is performed again on a quarterly basis for each securitization and re-securitization position. The Company uses an automated solution to track the due diligence associated with securitization activity. The Company aims to manage the risks associated with securitization and re-securitization positions through the use of offsetting positions and portfolio diversification.

 
Standardized Specific Risk Charge  For debt and equity positions that are not evaluated by the approved internal specific risk models, a regulatory prescribed standard specific risk charge is applied. The standard specific risk add-on for sovereign entities, public sector entities, and depository institutions is based on the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) country risk classifications (CRC) and the remaining contractual maturity of the position. These risk add-ons for debt positions range from 0.25% to 12%. The add-on for corporate debt is based on creditworthiness and the remaining contractual maturity of the position. All other types of debt positions are subject to an 8% add-on. The standard specific risk add-on for equity positions is generally 8%.
 
Comprehensive Risk Charge / Correlation Trading  The market risk capital rule requires capital for correlation trading positions. The Company's remaining correlation trading exposure covered under the market risk capital rule matured in fourth quarter 2014.

Table 40 summarizes the market risk-based capital requirements charge and market RWAs in accordance with the Basel III market risk capital rule as of March 31, 2015, and as of December 31, 2014. The market RWAs are calculated as the sum of the components in the table below.



48

Asset/Liability Management (continued)

Table 40:  Market Risk Regulatory Capital and RWAs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
(in millions)
Risk-
based
capital

 
Risk-
weighted
assets

 
Risk-
based
capital

 
Risk-
weighted
assets

Total VaR
$
147

 
1,836

 
146

 
1,822

Total Stressed VaR
1,041

 
13,009

 
1,469

 
18,359

Incremental Risk Charge
378

 
4,731

 
345

 
4,317

Securitized Products Charge
713

 
8,916

 
766

 
9,577

Standardized Specific Risk Charge
1,499

 
18,736

 
1,177

 
14,709

De minimis Charges (positions not included in models)
29

 
361

 
66

 
829

Total
$
3,807

 
47,589

 
3,969

 
49,613


RWA Rollforward  Table 41 depicts the changes in the market risk regulatory capital and RWAs under Basel III for the first quarter of 2015.
Table 41:  Analysis of Changes in Market Risk Regulatory Capital and RWAs
(in millions)
Risk-
based
capital

 
Risk-
weighted
assets

Balance, December 31, 2014
3,969

 
49,613

Total VaR
1

 
14

Total Stressed VaR
(428
)
 
(5,350
)
Incremental Risk Charge
33

 
414

Securitized Products Charge
(53
)
 
(661
)
Standardized Specific Risk Charge
322

 
4,027

De minimis Charges
(37
)
 
(468
)
Balance, March 31, 2015
$
3,807

 
47,589


All changes to market risk regulatory capital and RWAs in the quarter ended March 31, 2015, were associated with changes in positions due to normal trading activity.



49


VaR Backtesting  The market risk capital rule requires backtesting as one form of validation of the VaR model. Backtesting is a comparison of the daily VaR estimate with the actual clean profit and loss (clean P&L) as defined by the market risk capital rule. Clean P&L is the change in the value of the Company’s covered trading positions that would have occurred had previous end-of-day covered trading positions remained unchanged (therefore, excluding fees, commissions, net interest income, and intraday trading gains and losses). The backtesting analysis compares the daily Total VaR for each of the trading days in the preceding 12 months with the net clean P&L. Clean P&L does not include credit adjustments and other activity not representative of daily price changes driven by market risk factors. The clean P&L measure of revenue is used to evaluate the performance of the Total VaR and is not comparable to our actual daily trading net revenues, as reported elsewhere in this Report.
Any observed clean P&L loss in excess of the Total VaR is considered a market risk regulatory capital backtesting exception.
 
The actual number of exceptions (that is, the number of business days for which the clean P&L losses exceed the corresponding 1-day, 99% Total VaR measure) over the preceding 12 months is used to determine the capital multiplier for the capital calculation. The number of actual backtesting exceptions is dependent on current market performance relative to historic market volatility. This capital multiplier increases from a minimum of three to a maximum of four, depending on the number of exceptions. No backtesting exceptions occurred over the preceding 12 months. Backtesting is also performed at granular levels within the Company with sub-portfolio results provided to federal regulators.
Table 42 shows daily Total VaR (1-day, 99%) used for regulatory market risk capital backtesting for the 12 months ended March 31, 2015. The Company’s average Total VaR for first quarter 2015 was $20 million with a low of $18 million and a high of $22 million. 



Table 42:  Daily Total 1-Day 99% VaR Measure (Rolling 12 Months)
Market Risk Governance  The Finance Committee of our Board has primary oversight over market risk-taking activities of the Company and reviews the acceptable market risk appetite. The Corporate Risk Group’s Market Risk Committee, which reports to the Finance Committee of the Board, is responsible for governance and oversight over market risk-taking activities across the Company as well as the establishment of market risk appetite and associated limits. The Corporate Market Risk Group, which is part of the Corporate Risk Group, administers and monitors compliance with the requirements established by the Market Risk Committee. The Corporate Market Risk Group has oversight responsibilities in identifying, measuring and monitoring the Company’s market risk. The group is responsible for developing corporate market risk policy, creating quantitative market risk models, establishing independent risk limits, calculating and analyzing market risk capital, and reporting aggregated and line-of-business market risk information. Limits are regularly reviewed to ensure they remain relevant and within
 
the market risk appetite for the Company. An automated limits-monitoring system enables a daily comprehensive review of multiple limits mandated across businesses. Limits are set with inner boundaries that will be periodically breached to promote an ongoing dialogue of risk exposure within the Company. Each line of business that exposes the Company to market risk has direct responsibility for managing market risk in accordance with defined risk tolerances and approved market risk mandates and hedging strategies. We measure and monitor market risk for both management and regulatory capital purposes.

Model Risk Management  The market risk capital models are governed by our Corporate Model Risk Committee (CMoR) policies and procedures, which include model validation. The purpose of model validation includes ensuring the model is appropriate for its intended use and that appropriate controls exist to help mitigate the risk of invalid results. Model validation assesses the adequacy and appropriateness of the model,


50

Asset/Liability Management (continued)

including reviewing its key components such as inputs, processing components, logic or theory, output results and supporting model documentation. Validation also includes ensuring significant unobservable model inputs are appropriate given observable market transactions or other market data within the same or similar asset classes. This ensures modeled approaches are appropriate given similar product valuation techniques and are in line with their intended purpose. The Corporate Model Risk group provides oversight of model validation and assessment processes.
All internal valuation models are subject to ongoing review by business-unit-level management, and all models are subject to additional oversight by a corporate-level risk management department. Corporate oversight responsibilities include evaluating the adequacy of business unit risk management programs, maintaining company-wide model validation policies and standards, and reporting the results of these activities to management.

MARKET RISK - EQUITY INVESTMENTS  We are directly and indirectly affected by changes in the equity markets. We make and manage direct equity investments in start-up businesses, emerging growth companies, management buy-outs, acquisitions and corporate recapitalizations. We also invest in non-affiliated funds that make similar private equity investments. These private equity investments are made within capital allocations approved by management and the Board. The Board’s policy is to review business developments, key risks and historical returns for the private equity investment portfolio at least annually. Management reviews these investments at least quarterly and assesses them for possible OTTI. For nonmarketable investments, the analysis is based on facts and circumstances of each individual investment and the expectations for that investment’s cash flows and capital needs, the viability of its business model and our exit strategy. Nonmarketable investments include private equity investments accounted for under the cost method, equity method and fair value option.
As part of our business to support our customers, we trade public equities, listed/OTC equity derivatives and convertible bonds. We have parameters that govern these activities. We also have marketable equity securities in the available-for-sale securities portfolio, including securities relating to our venture capital activities. We manage these investments within capital risk limits approved by management and the Board and monitored by Corporate ALCO. Gains and losses on these securities are recognized in net income when realized and periodically include OTTI charges.
 
Changes in equity market prices may also indirectly affect our net income by (1) the value of third party assets under management and, hence, fee income, (2) borrowers whose ability to repay principal and/or interest may be affected by the stock market, or (3) brokerage activity, related commission income and other business activities. Each business line monitors and manages these indirect risks.
Table 43 provides information regarding our marketable and nonmarketable equity investments as of March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014.
Table 43:  Nonmarketable and Marketable Equity Investments
 
Mar 31,

 
Dec 31,

(in millions)
2015

 
2014

Nonmarketable equity investments:
 
 
 
Cost method:
 
 
 
Private equity and other
$
2,187

 
2,300

Federal bank stock
4,725

 
4,733

Total cost method
6,912

 
7,033

Equity method:
 
 
 
LIHTC investments (1)
7,464

 
7,278

Private equity and other
5,121

 
5,132

Total equity method
12,585

 
12,410

Fair value (2)
2,549

 
2,512

Total nonmarketable equity investments (3)
$
22,046

 
21,955

Marketable equity securities:
 
 
 
Cost
$
1,919

 
1,906

Net unrealized gains
1,585

 
1,770

Total marketable equity securities (4)
$
3,504

 
3,676

(1)
Represents low income housing tax credit investments.
(2)
Represents nonmarketable equity investments for which we have elected the fair value option. See Note 6 (Other Assets) and Note 13 (Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information.
(3)
Included in other assets on the balance sheet. See Note 6 (Other Assets) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information.
(4)
Included in available-for-sale securities. See Note 4 (Investment Securities) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information.



51


LIQUIDITY AND FUNDING  The objective of effective liquidity management is to ensure that we can meet customer loan requests, customer deposit maturities/withdrawals and other cash commitments efficiently under both normal operating conditions and under periods of Wells Fargo-specific and/or market stress. To achieve this objective, the Board of Directors establishes liquidity guidelines that require sufficient asset-based liquidity to cover potential funding requirements and to avoid over-dependence on volatile, less reliable funding markets. These guidelines are monitored on a monthly basis by the Corporate ALCO and on a quarterly basis by the Board of Directors. These guidelines are established and monitored for both the consolidated company and for the Parent on a stand-alone basis to ensure that the Parent is a source of strength for its regulated, deposit-taking banking subsidiaries.
We maintain liquidity in the form of cash, cash equivalents and unencumbered high-quality, liquid securities. These assets
 
make up our primary sources of liquidity, which are presented in Table 44. Our cash is primarily on deposit with the Federal Reserve. Securities included as part of our primary sources of liquidity are comprised of U.S. Treasury and federal agency debt, and mortgage-backed securities issued by federal agencies within our investment securities portfolio. We believe these securities provide quick sources of liquidity through sales or by pledging to obtain financing, regardless of market conditions. Some of these securities are within the held-to-maturity portion of our investment securities portfolio and as such are not intended for sale but may be pledged to obtain financing. Some of the legal entities within our consolidated group of companies are subject to various regulatory, tax, legal and other restrictions that can limit the transferability of their funds. We believe we maintain adequate liquidity at these entities in consideration of such funds transfer restrictions.

Table 44:  Primary Sources of Liquidity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
(in millions)
Total

 
Encumbered

 
Unencumbered

 
Total

 
Encumbered

 
Unencumbered

Interest-earning deposits
$
250,354

 

 
250,354

 
$
219,220

 

 
219,220

Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies (1)
75,707

 
3,361

 
72,346

 
67,352

 
856

 
66,496

Mortgage-backed securities of federal agencies (2)
117,689

 
67,059

 
50,630

 
115,730

 
80,324

 
35,406

Total
$
443,750

 
70,420

 
373,330

 
$
402,302

 
81,180

 
321,122

(1)
Included in encumbered securities at December 31, 2014, were securities with a fair value of $152 million which were purchased in December 2014, but settled in January 2015.
(2)
Included in encumbered securities at March 31, 2015, were securities with a fair value of $291 million, which were purchased in March 2015, but settled in April 2015. Included in encumbered securities at December 31, 2014, were securities with a fair value of $5 million, which were purchased in December 2014, but settled in January 2015.

In addition to our primary sources of liquidity shown in Table 44, liquidity is also available through the sale or financing of other securities including trading and/or available-for-sale securities, as well as through the sale, securitization or financing of loans, to the extent such securities and loans are not encumbered. In addition, other securities in our held-to-maturity portfolio, to the extent not encumbered, may be pledged to obtain financing.
 
Core customer deposits have historically provided a sizeable source of relatively stable and low-cost funds. At March 31, 2015, core deposits were 126% of total loans compared with 122% at December 31, 2014. Additional funding is provided by long-term debt, other foreign deposits, and short-term borrowings.
Table 45 shows selected information for short-term borrowings, which generally mature in less than 30 days.


52

Asset/Liability Management (continued)

Table 45:  Short-Term Borrowings
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Quarter ended
 
(in millions)
Mar 31
2015

 
Dec 31,
2014

 
Sep 30,
2014

 
Jun 30,
2014

 
Mar 31,
2014

Balance, period end
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
$
64,400

 
51,052

 
48,164

 
45,379

 
39,254

Commercial paper
3,552

 
2,456

 
4,365

 
4,261

 
6,070

Other short-term borrowings
9,745

 
10,010

 
10,398

 
12,209

 
11,737

Total
$
77,697

 
63,518

 
62,927

 
61,849

 
57,061

Average daily balance for period
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
$
58,881

 
51,509

 
47,088

 
42,233

 
37,711

Commercial paper
3,040

 
3,511

 
4,587

 
5,221

 
5,713

Other short-term borrowings
9,791

 
9,656

 
10,610

 
11,391

 
11,078

Total
$
71,712

 
64,676

 
62,285

 
58,845

 
54,502

Maximum month-end balance for period
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase (1)
$
66,943

 
51,052

 
48,164

 
45,379

 
39,589

Commercial paper (2)
3,552

 
3,740

 
4,665

 
5,175

 
6,070

Other short-term borrowings (3)
10,068

 
10,010

 
10,990

 
12,209

 
11,737

(1)
Highest month-end balance in each of the last five quarters was in February 2015 and December, September, June and February 2014.
(2)
Highest month-end balance in each of the last five quarters was in March 2015 and November, July, April and March 2014.
(3)
Highest month-end balance in each of the last five quarters was in February 2015 and December, July, June and March 2014.
We access domestic and international capital markets for long-term funding (generally greater than one year) through issuances of registered debt securities, private placements and asset-backed secured funding. Investors in the long-term capital markets, as well as other market participants, generally will consider, among other factors, a company’s debt rating in making investment decisions. Rating agencies base their ratings on many quantitative and qualitative factors, including capital adequacy, liquidity, asset quality, business mix, the level and quality of earnings, and rating agency assumptions regarding the probability and extent of federal financial assistance or support for certain large financial institutions. Adverse changes in these factors could result in a reduction of our credit rating; however, our debt securities do not contain credit rating covenants.
In light of industry changes and regulatory developments related to the Title II Orderly Liquidation Authority of the Dodd-Frank Act, rating agencies have proposed changes to various aspects of their ratings methodologies. Moody’s Investors Service (Moody's) has recently adopted a new global bank rating methodology, which considers how each type of creditor would be affected in any bank failure. As a result of this new methodology, certain of our ratings have been placed under review for possible upgrade, including Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s deposit rating as well as its senior and subordinated debt ratings. At the Parent level, Moody's rating for our non-cumulative preferred stock is likewise under review for possible upgrade. Standard and Poor’s Ratings Services (S&P) is continuing its reassessment of whether to incorporate the likelihood of extraordinary government support into the ratings of eight bank holding companies, including the Parent. S&P has indicated that this reassessment will be finalized sometime in 2015. In addition, S&P has issued a proposal to incorporate into its bank-level rating methodology an assessment of additional capital available to absorb losses to reduce default risk. Both the Parent and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. remain among the top-rated financial firms in the U.S.
 
See the “Risk Factors” section in our 2014 Form 10-K for additional information on the potential impact a credit rating downgrade would have on our liquidity and operations, as well as Note 12 (Derivatives) to Financial Statements in this Report for information regarding additional collateral and funding obligations required for certain derivative instruments in the event our credit ratings were to fall below investment grade.
The credit ratings of the Parent and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as of March 31, 2015, are presented in Table 46.


53


Table 46:  Credit Ratings as of March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Wells Fargo & Company
 
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
 
Senior debt
 
Short-term
borrowings 
 
Long-term
deposits 
 
Short-term
borrowings 
Moody's
A2
 
P-1
 
Aa3
 
P-1
S&P
A+
 
A-1
 
AA-
 
A-1+
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
AA-
 
F1+
 
AA
 
F1+
DBRS
AA
 
R-1*
 
AA**
 
R-1**
* middle    **high
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

On September 3, 2014, the FRB, OCC and FDIC issued a final rule that implements a quantitative liquidity requirement consistent with the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) established by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). The rule requires banking institutions, such as Wells Fargo, to hold high-quality liquid assets, such as central bank reserves and government and corporate debt that can be converted easily and quickly into cash, in an amount equal to or greater than its projected net cash outflows during a 30-day stress period. The final LCR rule will be phased-in beginning January 1, 2015, and requires full compliance with a minimum 100% LCR by January 1, 2017. The FRB also recently finalized rules imposing enhanced liquidity management standards on large bank holding companies (BHC) such as Wells Fargo. We continue to analyze these rules and other regulatory proposals that may affect liquidity risk management to determine the level of operational or compliance impact to Wells Fargo. For additional information see the “Capital Management” and “Regulatory Reform” sections in this Report and in our 2014 Form 10-K.
 
Parent Under SEC rules, our Parent is classified as a “well-known seasoned issuer,” which allows it to file a registration statement that does not have a limit on issuance capacity. In May 2014, the Parent filed a registration statement with the SEC for the issuance of senior and subordinated notes, preferred stock and other securities. The Parent’s ability to issue debt and other securities under this registration statement is limited by the debt issuance authority granted by the Board. The Parent is currently authorized by the Board to issue $60 billion in outstanding short-term debt and $170 billion in outstanding long-term debt. At March 31, 2015, the Parent had available $38.4 billion in short-term debt issuance authority and $64.7 billion in long-term debt issuance authority. The Parent’s debt issuance authority granted by the Board includes short-term and long-term debt issued to affiliates. During first quarter 2015, the Parent issued $5.3 billion of senior notes, of which all but $20 million were registered with the SEC. In addition, in April and May of 2015, the Parent issued $3.5 billion of senior notes, of which $2.3 billion were registered with the SEC.
The Parent’s proceeds from securities issued were used for general corporate purposes, and, unless otherwise specified in the applicable prospectus or prospectus supplement, we expect the proceeds from securities issued in the future will be used for the same purposes. Depending on market conditions, we may purchase our outstanding debt securities from time to time in privately negotiated or open market transactions, by tender offer, or otherwise.
Table 47 provides information regarding the Parent’s medium-term note (MTN) programs, which are covered by the long-term debt issuance authority granted by the Board. The Parent may issue senior and subordinated debt securities under Series N & O, and the European and Australian programmes. Under Series K, the Parent may issue senior debt securities linked
 
to one or more indices or bearing interest at a fixed or floating rate. 
Table 47:  Medium-Term Note (MTN) Programs
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2015
 
(in billions)
 
Date
established
 
 
 
Debt
issuance
authority

 
Available
for
issuance

MTN program:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Series N & O (1) (2)
 
May 2014
 
 
 
(2)

 
(2)

Series K (1) (3)
 
April 2010
 
 
 
$
25.0

 
$
21.7

European (4) (5)
 
December 2009
 
 
 
25.0

 
12.0

European (4) (6)
 
August 2013
 
 
 
10.0

 
9.2

Australian (4) (7)
 
June 2005
 
AUD
 
10.0

 
7.8

(1)
SEC registered.
(2)
The Parent can issue an indeterminate amount of debt securities, subject to the long-term debt issuance authority granted by the Board described above.
(3)
As amended in April 2012 and March 2015.
(4)
Not registered with the SEC. May not be offered in the United States without applicable exemptions from registration.
(5)
As amended in April 2012, April 2013, April 2014 and March 2015. For securities to be admitted to listing on the Official List of the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority and to trade on the Regulated Market of the London Stock Exchange.
(6)
As amended in May 2014 and April 2015, for securities that will not be admitted to listing, trading and/or quotation by any stock exchange or quotation system, or will be admitted to listing, trading and/or quotation by a stock exchange or quotation system that is not considered to be a regulated market.
(7)
As amended in October 2005, March 2010 and September 2013.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is authorized by its board of directors to issue $100 billion in outstanding short-term debt and $125 billion in outstanding long-term debt. At March 31, 2015, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. had available $100 billion in short-term debt issuance authority and $65.3 billion in long-term debt issuance authority. In April 2015, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. replaced its existing bank note program with a $100 billion bank note program under which, subject to any other debt outstanding under the limits described above, it may issue $50 billion in outstanding short-term senior notes and $50 billion in outstanding long-term senior or subordinated notes. At March 31, 2015, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. had remaining issuance capacity under the prior bank note program of $50 billion in short-term senior notes and $33.5 billion in long-term senior or subordinated notes. In addition, during first quarter 2015, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. had outstanding advances of $34.1 billion across the Federal Home Loan Bank System.
 
Wells Fargo Canada Corporation In February 2014, Wells Fargo Canada Corporation (WFCC), an indirect wholly owned Canadian subsidiary of the Parent, qualified with the Canadian provincial securities commissions a base shelf prospectus for the distribution from time to time in Canada of up to $7.0 billion Canadian dollars (CAD) in medium-term notes. At March 31, 2015, CAD $7.0 billion still remained available for future issuance under this prospectus. All medium-term notes issued by WFCC are unconditionally guaranteed by the Parent. 



54

Asset/Liability Management (continued)

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK MEMBERSHIP The Federal Home Loan Banks (the FHLBs) are a group of cooperatives that lending institutions use to finance housing and economic development in local communities. We are a member of the FHLBs based in Dallas, Des Moines and San Francisco. Each member of the FHLBs is required to maintain a minimum investment in capital stock of the applicable FHLB. The board of directors of each FHLB can increase the minimum investment requirements in the event it has concluded that additional capital is required to allow it to meet its own regulatory capital requirements. Any increase in the minimum investment requirements outside of specified ranges requires the approval of the Federal Housing Finance Board. Because the extent of any obligation to increase our investment in any of the FHLBs depends entirely upon the occurrence of a future event, potential future payments to the FHLBs are not determinable.



55


Capital Management

We have an active program for managing capital through a comprehensive process for assessing the Company’s overall capital adequacy. Our objective is to maintain capital at an amount commensurate with our risk profile and risk tolerance objectives, and to meet both regulatory and market expectations. Our potential sources of capital primarily include retention of earnings net of dividends, as well as issuances of common and preferred stock. Retained earnings increased $3.6 billion from December 31, 2014, predominantly from Wells Fargo net income of $5.8 billion, less common and preferred stock dividends of $2.2 billion. During first quarter 2015, we issued 41.0 million shares of common stock. We also issued 2 million Depositary Shares, each representing 1/25th interest in a share of the Company’s newly issued 5.875% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock, Series U, for an aggregate public offering price of $2.0 billion. During first quarter 2015, we repurchased 48.4 million shares of common stock in open market transactions, private transactions and from employee benefit plans, at a cost of $2.6 billion. We also entered into a $750 million forward repurchase contract in January 2015 with an unrelated third party that settled in April 2015 for 14.0 million shares. In addition, we entered into another $750 million forward repurchase contract with an unrelated third party in April 2015 that is expected to settle before August 2015 for approximately 14 million shares. For additional information about our forward repurchase agreements, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.
 
Regulatory Capital Guidelines
The Company and each of our insured depository institutions are subject to various regulatory capital adequacy requirements administered by the FRB and the OCC. Risk-based capital (RBC) guidelines establish a risk-adjusted ratio relating capital to different categories of assets and off-balance sheet exposures. At March 31, 2015, the Company and each of our insured depository institutions were “well-capitalized” under applicable regulatory capital adequacy guidelines. See Note 19 (Regulatory and Agency Capital Requirements) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information. Also see the "Capital Management" section in our 2014 Form 10-K for background and history of the various regulatory capital adequacy rules, minimum regulatory requirements and transition periods we follow.
In December 2010, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) finalized a set of revised international guidelines for determining regulatory capital known as “Basel III.” These guidelines were developed in response to the 2008 financial crisis and were intended to address many of the weaknesses identified in the previous Basel standards, as well as in the banking sector that contributed to the crisis including excessive leverage, inadequate and low quality capital and insufficient liquidity buffers.
In July 2013, federal banking regulators approved final and interim final rules to implement the BCBS Basel III capital guidelines for U.S. banking organizations. These final capital rules, among other things:
implement in the United States the Basel III regulatory capital reforms including those that revise the definition of capital, increase minimum capital ratios, and introduce a minimum Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio of 4.5% and a capital conservation buffer of 2.5% (for a total minimum CET1 ratio of 7.0%) and a potential countercyclical buffer of
 
up to 2.5%, which would be imposed by regulators at their discretion if it is determined that a period of excessive credit growth is contributing to an increase in systemic risk;
require a Tier 1 capital to average total consolidated assets ratio of 4% and introduce, for large and internationally active bank holding companies (BHCs), a Tier 1 supplementary leverage ratio of 3% that incorporates off-balance sheet exposures;
revise Basel I rules for calculating RWAs to enhance risk sensitivity under a standardized approach;
modify the existing Basel II advanced approaches rules for calculating RWAs to implement Basel III;
deduct certain assets from CET1, such as deferred tax assets that could not be realized through net operating loss carry- backs, significant investments in non-consolidated financial entities, and MSRs, to the extent any one category exceeds 10% of CET1 or all such items, in the aggregate, exceed 15% of CET1;
eliminate the accumulated other comprehensive income or loss filter that applies under RBC rules over a five-year phase-in period beginning in 2014; and
comply with the Dodd-Frank Act provision prohibiting the reliance on external credit ratings.
 
We were required to comply with the final Basel III capital rules beginning January 2014, with certain provisions subject to phase-in periods. The Basel III capital rules are scheduled to be fully phased in by January 1, 2022. Based on the final capital rules, we estimate that our CET1 ratio under the final Basel III capital rules using the Advanced Approach (fully phased-in) exceeded the minimum of 7.0% by 348 basis points at March 31, 2015.
In March 2015, the FRB and OCC announced that the Company and its national subsidiary banks may exit the parallel run phase and begin using the Basel III Advanced Approaches capital framework to determine risk-based capital requirements starting in second quarter 2015. Consistent with the Collins Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Act, banking organizations that have completed their parallel run process and have been approved by the FRB to use the Advanced Approach methodology to determine applicable minimum risk-weighted capital ratios and additional buffers, must use the higher of their RWAs as calculated under (i) the Advanced Approach rules, and (ii) from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2014, the general risk-based capital rules (General Approach) and, commencing on January 1, 2015, and thereafter, the risk weightings under the Standardized Approach rules. The Standardized and General Approaches each apply assigned risk weights to broad risk categories; however, many of the risk categories and/or weights were changed by Basel III for the Standardized Approach and will generally result in higher risk-weighted assets than from those prescribed for the General Approach. We will be subject to the lower of our CET1 ratio calculated under the Standardized Approach and under the Advanced Approach in the assessment of our capital adequacy. Currently the CET1 ratio is lower using management’s estimate of RWAs determined under the Advanced Approach but the amount of RWAs determined under the Standardized and Advanced Approaches has been converging.
In April 2014, federal banking regulators finalized a rule that enhances supplementary leverage ratio requirements for BHCs, like Wells Fargo, and their insured depository institutions. The supplementary leverage ratio consists of Tier 1 capital under


56

Capital Management (continued)

Basel III divided by the Company’s total leverage exposure. Total leverage exposure consists of the total average on-balance sheet assets, plus off-balance sheet exposures, such as undrawn commitments and derivative exposures, less amounts permitted to be deducted for Tier 1 capital. The rule, which becomes effective on January 1, 2018, will require a covered BHC to maintain a supplementary leverage ratio of at least 5% to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments. The rule will also require that all of our insured depository institutions maintain a supplementary leverage ratio of 6% in order to be considered well capitalized. In September 2014, federal banking regulators finalized additional changes to the supplementary leverage ratio requirements to implement revisions to the Basel III leverage framework finalized by the BCBS in January 2014. These additional changes, among other things, modify the methodology for including off-balance sheet items, including credit derivatives, repo-style transactions and lines of credit, in the denominator of the supplementary leverage ratio, and will become effective on January 1, 2018. The supplementary leverage ratio is required to be publicly disclosed beginning first quarter 2015. At March 31, 2015, our estimated supplementary leverage ratio for the Company was 8.0% assuming full phase-in of the Basel III Advanced Approach capital framework. Based on our review, our current leverage levels would exceed the applicable requirements for each of our insured depository institutions as well. In addition, as discussed in the “Risk Management - Asset/Liability Management - Liquidity and Funding” section in this Report, a final rule regarding the U.S. implementation of the Basel III LCR was issued by the FRB, OCC and FDIC in September 2014.
The FRB has also indicated that it is in the process of considering new rules to address the amount of equity and unsecured debt a company must hold to facilitate its orderly liquidation, often referred to as Total Loss Absorbing Capacity (TLAC). In November 2014, the Financial Stability Board (FSB) issued policy proposals on TLAC for public consultation. Under the FSB’s TLAC proposal, global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) would be required to hold loss absorbing equity and unsecured debt of 16-20% of RWAs, with at least 33% of this total being unsecured debt rather than equity. The FRB will likely propose related rules sometime after the FSB’s public consultation on the TLAC proposal ends.
In addition, in December 2014, the FRB proposed rules to implement an additional CET1 capital surcharge on those U.S. banking organizations, such as the Company, that have been designated by the FSB as G-SIBs. The G-SIB surcharge would be in addition to the minimum Basel III 7.0% CET1 requirement. Under the FRB proposal, a G-SIB would calculate its surcharge under two methods and use the higher of the two surcharges. The first method would consider the G-SIB’s size, interconnectedness, cross-jurisdictional activity, substitutability, and complexity, consistent with a methodology developed by the BCBS and FSB. The second would use similar inputs, but would replace substitutability with use of short-term wholesale funding and would generally result in higher surcharges than the BCBS methodology. Under the FRB proposal, estimated surcharges for G-SIBs would range from 1.0 to 4.5 percent of a firm’s RWAs. The G-SIB surcharge would be phased in beginning on January 1, 2016 and become fully effective on January 1, 2019. The FSB, in an updated listing published in November 2014 based on year-end 2013 data, identified the Company as one of the 30 G-SIBs.
 
 
Capital Planning and Stress Testing 
Our planned long-term capital structure is designed to meet regulatory and market expectations. We believe that our long-term targeted capital structure enables us to invest in and grow our business, satisfy our customers' financial needs in varying environments, access markets, and maintain flexibility to return capital to our shareholders. Our long-term targeted capital structure also considers capital levels sufficient to exceed Basel III capital requirements including the U.S. G-SIB proposal. Accordingly, based on the final Basel III capital rules under the higher of the Standardized or Advanced Approaches RWAs, we currently target a long-term CET1 capital ratio at or in excess of 10%, which assumes a 2% surcharge under the U.S. G-SIB proposal. Our capital targets are subject to change based on various factors, including changes to the regulatory capital framework and expectations for large banks promulgated by bank regulatory agencies, planned capital actions, changes in our risk profile and other factors.
Under the FRB’s capital plan rule, large BHCs are required to submit capital plans annually for review to determine if the FRB has any objections before making any capital distributions. The rule requires updates to capital plans in the event of material changes in a BHC’s risk profile, including as a result of any significant acquisitions. The FRB assesses the overall financial condition, risk profile, and capital adequacy of BHCs while considering both quantitative and qualitative factors when evaluating capital plans.
Our 2015 CCAR, which was submitted on January 2, 2015, included a comprehensive capital plan supported by an assessment of expected uses and sources of capital over a given planning horizon under a range of expected and stress scenarios, similar to the process the FRB used to conduct the CCAR in 2014. As part of the 2015 CCAR, the FRB also generated a supervisory stress test, which assumed a sharp decline in the economy and significant decline in asset pricing using the information provided by the Company to estimate performance. The FRB reviewed the supervisory stress results both as required under the Dodd-Frank Act using a common set of capital actions for all large BHCs and by taking into account the Company’s proposed capital actions. The FRB published its supervisory stress test results as required under the Dodd-Frank Act on March 5, 2015. On March 11, 2015, the FRB notified us that it did not object to our capital plan included in the 2015 CCAR. The capital plan included an increase in our second quarter 2015 common stock dividend rate to $0.375 per share, which was approved by the Board on April 28, 2015.
In addition to CCAR, federal banking regulators also require stress tests to evaluate whether an institution has sufficient capital to continue to operate during periods of adverse economic and financial conditions. These stress testing requirements set forth the timing and type of stress test activities large BHCs and banks must undertake as well as rules governing stress testing controls, oversight and disclosure requirements. The FRB recently finalized rules amending the existing capital plan and stress testing rules to move the start date of capital plan and stress testing cycles to the first and third quarters of each year beginning in 2016 and to limit a large BHC’s ability to make capital distributions to the extent its actual capital issuances were less than amounts indicated in its capital plan. We currently must submit a mid-cycle stress test based on first quarter data and scenarios developed by the Company.


57


Securities Repurchases
From time to time the Board authorizes the Company to repurchase shares of our common stock. Although we announce when the Board authorizes share repurchases, we typically do not give any public notice before we repurchase our shares. Future stock repurchases may be private or open-market repurchases, including block transactions, accelerated or delayed block transactions, forward transactions, and similar transactions. Additionally, we may enter into plans to purchase stock that satisfy the conditions of Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Various factors determine the amount and timing of our share repurchases, including our capital requirements, the number of shares we expect to issue for employee benefit plans and acquisitions, market conditions (including the trading price of our stock), and regulatory and legal considerations, including the FRB’s response to our capital plan and to changes in our risk profile.
In March 2014, the Board authorized the repurchase of 350 million shares of our common stock. At March 31, 2015, we had remaining authority to repurchase approximately 192 million shares, subject to regulatory and legal conditions. For more information about share repurchases during first quarter 2015, see Part II, Item 2 in this Report.
Historically, our policy has been to repurchase shares under the “safe harbor” conditions of Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 including a limitation on the daily volume of repurchases. Rule 10b-18 imposes an additional daily volume limitation on share repurchases during a pending merger or acquisition in which shares of our stock will constitute some or all of the consideration. Our management may determine that during a pending stock merger or acquisition when the safe harbor would otherwise be available, it is in our best interest to repurchase shares in excess of this additional daily volume limitation. In such cases, we intend to repurchase shares in compliance with the other conditions of the safe harbor, including the standing daily volume limitation that applies whether or not there is a pending stock merger or acquisition.
 
In connection with our participation in the Capital Purchase Program (CPP), a part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), we issued to the U.S. Treasury Department warrants to purchase 110,261,688 shares of our common stock with an original exercise price of $34.01 per share expiring on October 28, 2018. The terms of the warrants require the exercise price to be adjusted under certain circumstances when the Company’s quarterly common stock dividend exceeds $0.34 per share, which began occurring in second quarter 2014. Accordingly, with each quarterly common stock dividend above $0.34 per share, we must calculate whether an adjustment to the exercise price is required by the terms of the warrants, including whether certain minimum thresholds have been met to trigger an adjustment, and notify the holders of any such change. The Board authorized the repurchase by the Company of up to $1 billion of the warrants. At March 31, 2015, there were 37,805,954 warrants outstanding, exercisable at $33.984 per share, and $452 million of unused warrant repurchase authority. Depending on market conditions, we may purchase from time to time additional warrants in privately negotiated or open market transactions, by tender offer or otherwise.

Risk-Based Capital and Risk-Weighted Assets
Table 48 and Table 49 provide information regarding the composition of and change in our risk-based capital, respectively, under Basel III Standardized Approach with Transition Requirements at March 31, 2015, and Basel III General Approach at December 31, 2014.


58

Capital Management (continued)

Table 48:  Risk-Based Capital Components Under Basel III
 
 
Standardized
Approach (1)

 
General
Approach (1)

 
 
Mar 31,

 
Dec 31,

(in billions)
 
2015

 
2014

Total equity
 
$
190.0

 
185.3

Noncontrolling interests
 
(1.2
)
 
(0.9
)
Total Wells Fargo stockholders' equity
 
188.8

 
184.4

Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock
 
(20.0
)
 
(18.0
)
Cumulative other comprehensive income (2)
 
(1.9
)
 
(2.6
)
Goodwill and other intangible assets (2)(3)
 
(26.9
)
 
(26.3
)
Investment in certain subsidiaries and other
 
(0.8
)
 
(0.4
)
Common Equity Tier 1 (1)(4)
(A)
139.2

 
137.1

Preferred stock
 
20.0

 
18.0

Qualifying hybrid securities and noncontrolling interests
 

 

Other
 
(0.4
)
 
(0.4
)
Total Tier 1 capital
 
158.8

 
154.7

Long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 2
 
24.4

 
25.0

Qualifying allowance for credit losses
 
13.0

 
13.2

Other
 

 

Total Tier 2 capital
 
37.4

 
38.2

Total qualifying capital
(B)
$
196.2

 
192.9

Risk-Weighted Assets (RWAs) (5):
 
 
 
 
Credit risk
 
$
1,253.9

 
1,192.9

Market risk
 
47.6

 
49.6

Total RWAs
(C)
$
1,301.5

 
1,242.5

Capital Ratios:
 
 
 
 
Common Equity Tier 1 to total RWAs
(A)/(C)
10.69
%
 
11.04

Total capital to total RWAs
(B)/(C)
15.08

 
15.53

(1)
Basel III revises the definition of capital, increases minimum capital ratios, and introduces a minimum Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio. These changes are being fully phased in effective January 1, 2014, through the end of 2021. The capital ratios were determined using the Basel III definition of capital and the Basel III Standardized Approach RWAs with Transition Requirements as of March 31, 2015 and the general risk-based capital rules (General Approach) RWAs for 2014. See Table 51 in this section for a summary of changes in RWAs from December 31, 2014, to March 31, 2015.
(2)
Under transition provisions to Basel III, cumulative other comprehensive income (previously deducted under Basel I) is included in CET1 over a specified phase-in period. In addition, certain intangible assets includable in CET1 are phased out over a specified period.
(3)
Goodwill and other intangible assets are net of any associated deferred tax liabilities.
(4)
CET1 (formerly Tier 1 common equity under Basel I) is a non-GAAP financial measure that is used by investors, analysts and bank regulatory agencies to assess the capital position of financial services companies. Management reviews CET1 along with other measures of capital as part of its financial analyses and has included this non-GAAP financial information, and the corresponding reconciliation to total equity, because of current interest in such information on the part of market participants.
(5)
Under the regulatory guidelines for risk-based capital, on-balance sheet assets and credit equivalent amounts of derivatives and off-balance sheet items are assigned to one of several broad risk categories according to the obligor, or, if relevant, the guarantor or the nature of any collateral. The aggregate dollar amount in each risk category is then multiplied by the risk weight associated with that category. The resulting weighted values from each of the risk categories are aggregated for determining total RWAs. The risk weights and categories were changed by Basel III for the Standardized Approach and will generally result in higher RWAs than result from the General Approach risk weights and categories. See Table 50 in this section for a more detailed summary of the components of RWAs.

59


Table 49:  Analysis of Changes in Capital Under Basel III
 
(in billions)
 
 
Common Equity Tier 1 at December 31, 2014
 
$
137.1

Net income
 
5.5

Common stock dividends
 
(1.8
)
Common stock issued, repurchased, and stock compensation-related items
 
(1.5
)
Goodwill and other intangible assets (net of any associated deferred tax liabilities)
 
(0.6
)
Other
 
0.5

Change in Common Equity Tier 1
 
2.1

Common Equity Tier 1 at March 31, 2015
 
$
139.2

 
 
 
Tier 1 capital at December 31, 2014
 
$
154.7

Change in Common Equity Tier 1
 
2.1

Issuance of noncumulative perpetual preferred
 
2.0

Change in Tier 1 capital
 
4.1

Tier 1 capital at March 31, 2015
(A)
$
158.8

 
 
 
Tier 2 capital at December 31, 2014
 
$
38.2

Change in long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 2
 
(0.6
)
Change in qualifying allowance for credit losses
 
(0.2
)
Other
 

Change in Tier 2 capital
 
(0.8
)
Tier 2 capital at March 31, 2015
(B)
37.4

Total qualifying capital
(A) + (B)
$
196.2


Table 50 presents information on the components of RWAs included within our regulatory capital ratios. RWAs as of December 31, 2014 were determined under the Basel III General
 
Approach, and RWAs as of March 31, 2015 reflect the transition to the Basel III Standardized Approach with Transition Requirements.


Table 50:  RWAs Under Basel III
 
 
 
 
Standardized
Approach (1)

 
General
Approach

 
Mar 31,

 
Dec 31,

(in billions)
2015

 
2014

Credit risk RWAs
 
 
 
On-balance sheet
 
 
 
Investment securities
$
103.3

 
85.5

Securities financing transactions (2)
21.2

 
12.4

Loans (3)
754.7

 
726.0

Other
118.7

 
112.6

Off-balance sheet
 
 
 
Commitments and guarantees (4)
182.4

 
218.9

Derivatives
26.7

 
10.3

Other
46.9

 
27.2

Total credit risk RWAs
1,253.9

 
1,192.9

Market risk RWAs — On-balance sheet (5)
47.6

 
49.6

Total RWAs
$
1,301.5

 
1,242.5

(1)
Determined using Basel III Standardized Approach with Transition Requirements.
(2)
Represents federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements.
(3)
Represents loans held for sale and loans held for investment.
(4)
Predominantly includes financial standby letters of credit and other unused commitments.
(5)
Represents regulatory 'covered' positions within trading assets and liabilities.


60

Capital Management (continued)

Table 51 presents changes in RWAs for the first quarter of 2015. Effective January 1, 2015, we commenced transitioning RWAs from the Basel III General Approach to the Standardized Approach with Transition Requirements under final rules adopted by federal banking regulators in July 2013.
 


Table 51:  Analysis of Changes in RWAs
 
(in billions)
 
 
Basel III General Approach RWAs at December 31, 2014
 
$
1,242.5

Effect of changes in rules
 
52.3

Basel III Standardized Approach RWAs at December 31, 2014
 
1,294.8

Net change in credit risk RWAs
 
 
On-balance sheet
 
 
Investment securities
 
0.3

Securities financing transactions
 
9.0

Loans
 
(3.3
)
Other
 
(1.1
)
Off-balance sheet
 
 
Commitments and guarantees
 
(2.3
)
Derivatives
 
1.3

Other
 
4.8

Total change in credit risk RWAs
 
8.7

Net change in market risk RWAs — On-balance sheet
 
(2.0
)
Total change in RWAs
 
6.7

Basel III Standardized Approach RWAs at March 31, 2015
 
$
1,301.5


Table 52 provides information regarding our CET1 calculation as estimated under Basel III using the Advanced Approach, fully phased-in method. 
 


Table 52:  Common Equity Tier 1 Under Basel III (Advanced Approach, Fully Phased-In) (1)(2)
 
(in billions)
March 31, 2015
 
Common Equity Tier 1 (transition amount) under Basel III
 
$
139.2

Adjustments from transition amount to fully phased-in Basel III (3):
 
 
Cumulative other comprehensive income
 
1.9

Other
 
(2.1
)
Total adjustments
 
(0.2
)
Common Equity Tier 1 (fully phased-in) under Basel III
(C)
$
139.0

Total RWAs anticipated under Basel III (4)
(D)
$
1,326.3

Common Equity Tier 1 to total RWAs anticipated under Basel III (Advanced Approach, fully phased-in)
(C)/(D)
10.48
%
(1)
CET1 is a non-GAAP financial measure that is used by investors, analysts and bank regulatory agencies to assess the capital position of financial services companies. Management reviews CET1 along with other measures of capital as part of its financial analyses and has included this non-GAAP financial information, and the corresponding reconciliation to total equity, because of current interest in such information on the part of market participants.
(2)
The Basel III CET1 and RWAs are estimated based on the Basel III capital rules adopted July 2, 2013, by the FRB. The rules establish a new comprehensive capital framework for U.S. banking organizations that implement the Basel III capital framework and certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The rules are being fully phased in effective January 1, 2014, through the end of 2021.
(3)
Assumes cumulative other comprehensive income is fully phased in and certain other intangible assets are fully phased out under Basel III capital rules.
(4)
The final Basel III capital rules provide for two capital frameworks: the Standardized Approach intended to replace Basel I, and the Advanced Approach applicable to certain institutions. Under the final rules, we will be subject to the lower of our CET1 ratio calculated under the Standardized Approach and under the Advanced Approach in the assessment of our capital adequacy. While the amount of RWAs determined under the Standardized and Advanced Approaches has been converging, the amount of RWAs as of March 31, 2015, was based on the Advanced Approach, which was higher than RWAs under the Standardized Approach, and thus resulted in a lower CET1 ratio compared with the Standardized Approach. Basel III capital rules adopted by the Federal Reserve Board incorporate different classification of assets, with risk weights based on Wells Fargo's internal models, along with adjustments to address a combination of credit/counterparty, operational and market risks, and other Basel III elements.




61


Regulatory Reform
Since the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010, the U.S. financial services industry has been subject to a significant increase in regulation and regulatory oversight initiatives. This increased regulation and oversight has substantially changed how most U.S. financial services companies conduct business and has increased their regulatory compliance costs.
For a discussion of the significant regulations and regulatory oversight initiatives that have affected or may affect our business, we refer you to the “Regulatory Reform” and “Risk Factors” sections of our 2014 Form 10-K.

 









 


Critical Accounting Policies
Our significant accounting policies (see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K) are fundamental to understanding our results of operations and financial condition because they require that we use estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of our assets or liabilities and financial results. Five of these policies are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. These policies govern:
the allowance for credit losses;
PCI loans;
the valuation of residential MSRs;
the fair valuation of financial instruments; and
income taxes.

Management and the Board's Audit and Examination Committee have reviewed and approved these critical accounting policies. These policies are described further in the “Financial Review – Critical Accounting Policies” section and Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K.


62


Current Accounting Developments
The following table provides accounting pronouncements applicable to us that have been issued by the FASB but are not yet effective.


Standard
 
Description
 
Effective date and financial statement impact
Accounting Standards Update (ASU or Update) 2015-07 - Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)
 
The Update eliminates the disclosure requirement to categorize investments within the fair value hierarchy that are measured at fair value using net asset value as a practical expedient.
 
The guidance is effective for us in first quarter 2016 with retrospective application. Early adoption is permitted. The Update will not affect our consolidated financial statements as it impacts only the fair value disclosure requirements for certain investments.
ASU 2015-03 - Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs
 
The Update changes the balance sheet presentation for debt issuance costs. Under the new guidance, debt issuance costs should be reported as a deduction from debt liabilities rather than as a deferred charge classified as an asset.
 
The Update is effective for us in first quarter 2016 with retrospective application. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact this Update will have on our consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2015-02 - Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis
 
The Update primarily amends the criteria companies use to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain variable interest entities that have fee arrangements and the criteria used to determine whether partnerships and similar entities are variable interest entities. The Update also excludes certain money market funds from the consolidation guidance.
 
The changes are effective for us in first quarter 2016 with early adoption permitted. We are evaluating the impact the Update will have on our consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2015-01 - Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items
 
The Update removes the concept of extraordinary items from GAAP and eliminates the requirement for extraordinary items to be separately presented in the statement of income.
 
The Update is effective for us in first quarter 2016 with prospective or retrospective application. Early adoption is permitted. The Update will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2014-16 - Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share is More Akin to Debt or Equity
 
The Update clarifies that the nature of host contracts in hybrid financial instruments that are issued in share form should be determined based on the entire instrument, including the embedded derivative.
 
The Update is effective for us in first quarter 2016 with retrospective application. The Update will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2014-13 - Consolidation (Topic 810): Measuring the Financial Assets and the Financial Liabilities of a Consolidated Collateralized Financing Entity
 
The Update provides a measurement alternative to companies that consolidate collateralized financing entities (CFEs), such as collateralized debt obligation and collateralized loan obligation structures. Under the new guidance, companies can measure both the financial assets and financial liabilities of a CFE using the more observable fair value of the financial assets or of the financial liabilities.
 
These changes are effective for us in first quarter 2016 with early adoption permitted at the beginning of an annual period. The guidance can be applied either retrospectively or by a modified retrospective approach. The Update will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

63


Standard
 
Description
 
Effective date and financial statement impact
ASU 2014-12 - Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved After the Requisite Service Period
 
The Update provides accounting guidance for employee share-based payment awards with specific performance targets. The Update clarifies that performance targets should be treated as performance conditions if the targets affect vesting and could be achieved after the requisite service period.
 
The Update is effective for us in first quarter 2016 with early adoption permitted and can be applied prospectively or retrospectively. The Update will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2014-09 - Revenue from Contracts With Customers (Topic 606)
 
The Update modifies the guidance companies use to recognize revenue from contracts with customers for transfers of goods or services and transfers of nonfinancial assets, unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. The guidance also requires new qualitative and quantitative disclosures, including information about contract balances and performance obligations.
 
The Update is effective for us in first quarter 2017 with retrospective application to prior periods presented or as a cumulative effect adjustment in the period of adoption. The FASB has proposed deferring the effective date by one year. We are evaluating the impact the Update will have on our consolidated financial statements.
Forward-Looking Statements
This document contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In addition, we may make forward-looking statements in our other documents filed or furnished with the SEC, and our management may make forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, representatives of the media and others. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “seeks,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “target,” “projects,” “outlook,” “forecast,” “will,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “can” and similar references to future periods. In particular, forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements we make about: (i) the future operating or financial performance of the Company, including our outlook for future growth; (ii) our noninterest expense and efficiency ratio; (iii) future credit quality and performance, including our expectations regarding future loan losses and allowance levels; (iv) the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses; (v) our expectations regarding net interest income and net interest margin; (vi) loan growth or the reduction or mitigation of risk in our loan portfolios; (vii) future capital levels or targets and our estimated Common Equity Tier 1 ratio under Basel III capital standards; (viii) the performance of our mortgage business and any related exposures; (ix) the expected outcome and impact of legal, regulatory and legislative developments, as well as our expectations regarding compliance therewith; (x) future common stock dividends, common share repurchases and other uses of capital; (xi) our targeted range for return on assets and return on equity; (xii) the outcome of contingencies, such as legal proceedings; and (xiii) the Company’s plans, objectives and strategies.
Forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts but instead represent our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking
 
statements. We caution you, therefore, against relying on any of these forward-looking statements. They are neither statements of historical fact nor guarantees or assurances of future performance. While there is no assurance that any list of risks and uncertainties or risk factors is complete, important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include the following, without limitation:
current and future economic and market conditions, including the effects of declines in housing prices, high unemployment rates, U.S. fiscal debt, budget and tax matters, geopolitical matters, and the overall slowdown in global economic growth;
our capital and liquidity requirements (including under regulatory capital standards, such as the Basel III capital standards) and our ability to generate capital internally or raise capital on favorable terms;
financial services reform and other current, pending or future legislation or regulation that could have a negative effect on our revenue and businesses, including the Dodd-Frank Act and other legislation and regulation relating to bank products and services;
the extent of our success in our loan modification efforts, as well as the effects of regulatory requirements or guidance regarding loan modifications;
the amount of mortgage loan repurchase demands that we receive and our ability to satisfy any such demands without having to repurchase loans related thereto or otherwise indemnify or reimburse third parties, and the credit quality of or losses on such repurchased mortgage loans;
negative effects relating to our mortgage servicing and foreclosure practices, as well as changes in industry standards or practices, regulatory or judicial requirements, penalties or fines, increased servicing and other costs or obligations, including loan modification requirements, or delays or moratoriums on foreclosures;


64

Forward-Looking Statements (continued)

our ability to realize our efficiency ratio target as part of our expense management initiatives, including as a result of business and economic cyclicality, seasonality, changes in our business composition and operating environment, growth in our businesses and/or acquisitions, and unexpected expenses relating to, among other things, litigation and regulatory matters;
the effect of the current low interest rate environment or changes in interest rates on our net interest income, net interest margin and our mortgage originations, mortgage servicing rights and mortgages held for sale;
a recurrence of significant turbulence or disruption in the capital or financial markets, which could result in, among other things, reduced investor demand for mortgage loans, a reduction in the availability of funding or increased funding costs, and declines in asset values and/or recognition of other-than-temporary impairment on securities held in our investment securities portfolio;
the effect of a fall in stock market prices on our investment banking business and our fee income from our brokerage, asset and wealth management businesses;
reputational damage from negative publicity, protests, fines, penalties and other negative consequences from regulatory violations and legal actions;
a failure in or breach of our operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of our third party vendors or other service providers, including as a result of cyber attacks;
the effect of changes in the level of checking or savings account deposits on our funding costs and net interest margin;
fiscal and monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Board; and
 
the other risk factors and uncertainties described under “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.
 
In addition to the above factors, we also caution that the amount and timing of any future common stock dividends or repurchases will depend on the earnings, cash requirements and financial condition of the Company, market conditions, capital requirements (including under Basel capital standards), common stock issuance requirements, applicable law and regulations (including federal securities laws and federal banking regulations), and other factors deemed relevant by the Company’s Board of Directors, and may be subject to regulatory approval or conditions.
For more information about factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations, refer to our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the discussion under “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and available on its website at www.sec.gov. 
Any forward-looking statement made by us speaks only as of the date on which it is made. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law.


Risk Factors
An investment in the Company involves risk, including the possibility that the value of the investment could fall substantially and that dividends or other distributions on the investment could be reduced or eliminated. For a discussion of risk factors that could adversely affect our financial results and condition, and the value of, and return on, an investment in the Company, we refer you to the “Risk Factors” section of our 2014 Form 10-K.


65


Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s management evaluated the effectiveness, as of March 31, 2015, of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. The Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer participated in the evaluation. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2015.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company’s Board, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and includes those policies and procedures that:
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets of the Company;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. No change occurred during first quarter 2015 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

66


Wells Fargo & Company and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Income (Unaudited)
 
Quarter ended March 31,
 
(in millions, except per share amounts)
2015

 
2014

Interest income
 
 
 
Trading assets
$
445

 
374

Investment securities
2,144

 
2,110

Mortgages held for sale
177

 
170

Loans held for sale
5

 
2

Loans
8,938

 
8,746

Other interest income
254

 
210

Total interest income
11,963

 
11,612

Interest expense
 
 
 
Deposits
258

 
279

Short-term borrowings
18

 
12

Long-term debt
604

 
619

Other interest expense
97

 
87

Total interest expense
977

 
997

Net interest income
10,986


10,615

Provision for credit losses
608

 
325

Net interest income after provision for credit losses
10,378

 
10,290

Noninterest income
 
 
 
Service charges on deposit accounts
1,215

 
1,215

Trust and investment fees
3,677

 
3,412

Card fees
871

 
784

Other fees
1,078

 
1,047

Mortgage banking
1,547

 
1,510

Insurance
430

 
432

Net gains from trading activities
408

 
432

Net gains on debt securities (1)
278

 
83

Net gains from equity investments (2)
370

 
847

Lease income
132

 
133

Other
286

 
115

Total noninterest income
10,292

 
10,010

Noninterest expense
 
 
 
Salaries
3,851

 
3,728

Commission and incentive compensation
2,685

 
2,416

Employee benefits
1,477

 
1,372

Equipment
494

 
490

Net occupancy
723

 
742

Core deposit and other intangibles
312

 
341

FDIC and other deposit assessments
248

 
243

Other
2,717

 
2,616

Total noninterest expense
12,507

 
11,948

Income before income tax expense
8,163


8,352

Income tax expense
2,279

 
2,277

Net income before noncontrolling interests
5,884


6,075

Less: Net income from noncontrolling interests
80

 
182

Wells Fargo net income
$
5,804


5,893

Less: Preferred stock dividends and other
343

 
286

Wells Fargo net income applicable to common stock
$
5,461

 
5,607

Per share information
 
 
 
Earnings per common share
$
1.06

 
1.07

Diluted earnings per common share
1.04

 
1.05

Dividends declared per common share
0.35

 
0.30

Average common shares outstanding
5,160.4

 
5,262.8

Diluted average common shares outstanding
5,243.6

 
5,353.3

(1)
Total other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) losses (reversal of losses) were $(6) million and $(14) million for first quarter 2015 and 2014, respectively. Of total OTTI, losses of $31 million and $7 million were recognized in earnings, and reversal of losses of $(37) million and $(21) million were recognized as non-credit-related OTTI in other comprehensive income for first quarter 2015 and 2014, respectively.
(2)
Includes OTTI losses of $42 million and $128 million for first quarter 2015 and 2014, respectively. 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

67


Wells Fargo & Company and Subsidiaries
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)

 
 
Quarter ended March 31,
 
(in millions)
 
2015

 
2014

Wells Fargo net income
 
$
5,804

 
5,893

Other comprehensive income, before tax:
 
 
 
 
Investment securities:
 
 
 
 
Net unrealized gains arising during the period
 
393

 
2,725

Reclassification of net gains to net income
 
(300
)
 
(394
)
Derivatives and hedging activities:
 
 
 
 
Net unrealized gains arising during the period
 
952

 
44

Reclassification of net gains on cash flow hedges to net income
 
(234
)
 
(106
)
Defined benefit plans adjustments:
 
 
 
 
Net actuarial losses arising during the period
 
(11
)
 

Amortization of net actuarial loss, settlements and other to net income
 
43

 
18

Foreign currency translation adjustments:
 
 
 
 
Net unrealized losses arising during the period
 
(55
)
 
(17
)
Reclassification of net losses to net income
 

 
6

Other comprehensive income, before tax
 
788

 
2,276

Income tax expense related to other comprehensive income
 
(228
)
 
(831
)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
 
560

 
1,445

Less: Other comprehensive income from noncontrolling interests
 
301

 
79

Wells Fargo other comprehensive income, net of tax
 
259

 
1,366

Wells Fargo comprehensive income
 
6,063

 
7,259

Comprehensive income from noncontrolling interests
 
381

 
261

Total comprehensive income
 
$
6,444

 
7,520


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

68


Wells Fargo & Company and Subsidiaries
 
 
 
Consolidated Balance Sheet
 
 
 
(in millions, except shares)
Mar 31,
2015

 
Dec 31
2014

Assets
(Unaudited)

 
 
Cash and due from banks
$
19,793

 
19,571

Federal funds sold, securities purchased under resale agreements and other short-term investments
291,317

 
258,429

Trading assets
79,278

 
78,255

Investment securities:
 
 
 
Available-for-sale, at fair value 
257,603

 
257,442

Held-to-maturity, at cost (fair value $68,781 and $56,359) 
67,133

 
55,483

Mortgages held for sale (includes $19,015 and $15,565 carried at fair value) (1) 
23,606

 
19,536

Loans held for sale (includes $1 and $1 carried at fair value) (1) 
681

 
722

Loans (includes $5,730 and $5,788 carried at fair value) (1)
861,231

 
862,551

Allowance for loan losses 
(12,176
)
 
(12,319
)
Net loans
849,055

 
850,232

Mortgage servicing rights: 
 
 
 
Measured at fair value 
11,739

 
12,738

Amortized 
1,252

 
1,242

Premises and equipment, net 
8,696

 
8,743

Goodwill 
25,705

 
25,705

Other assets (includes $2,549 and $2,512 carried at fair value) (1) 
101,879

 
99,057

Total assets (2) 
$
1,737,737

 
1,687,155

Liabilities 
 
 
 
Noninterest-bearing deposits 
$
335,858

 
321,963

Interest-bearing deposits 
860,805

 
846,347

Total deposits 
1,196,663

 
1,168,310

Short-term borrowings 
77,697

 
63,518

Accrued expenses and other liabilities
90,121

 
86,122

Long-term debt 
183,292

 
183,943

Total liabilities (3) 
1,547,773

 
1,501,893

Equity 
 
 
 
Wells Fargo stockholders' equity:  
 
 
 
Preferred stock 
21,998

 
19,213

Common stock – $1-2/3 par value, authorized 9,000,000,000 shares; issued 5,481,811,474 and 5,481,811,474 shares 
9,136

 
9,136

Additional paid-in capital 
59,980

 
60,537

Retained earnings 
110,676

 
107,040

Cumulative other comprehensive income 
3,777

 
3,518

Treasury stock – 318,869,849 shares and 311,462,276 shares 
(14,556
)
 
(13,690
)
Unearned ESOP shares 
(2,215
)
 
(1,360
)
Total Wells Fargo stockholders' equity 
188,796

 
184,394

Noncontrolling interests 
1,168

 
868

Total equity 
189,964

 
185,262

Total liabilities and equity
$
1,737,737

 
1,687,155

(1)
Parenthetical amounts represent assets and liabilities for which we have elected the fair value option.
(2)
Our consolidated assets at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, include the following assets of certain variable interest entities (VIEs) that can only be used to settle the liabilities of those VIEs: Cash and due from banks, $155 million and $117 million; Investment securities, $749 million and $875 million; Net loans, $4.8 billion and $4.5 billion; Other assets, $314 million and $316 million, and Total assets, $6.0 billion and 5.8 billion, respectively.
(3)
Our consolidated liabilities at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, include the following VIE liabilities for which the VIE creditors do not have recourse to Wells Fargo: Accrued expenses and other liabilities, $48 million and $49 million; Long-term debt, $1.6 billion and $1.6 billion; and Total liabilities, $1.6 billion and $1.7 billion, respectively. 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

69



Wells Fargo & Company and Subsidiaries
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity (Unaudited)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock
 
 
Common stock
 
(in millions, except shares)
Shares

 
Amount

 
Shares

 
Amount

Balance January 1, 2014
10,881,195

 
$
16,267

 
5,257,162,705

 
$
9,136

Net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common stock issued
 
 
 
 
35,873,142

 
 
Common stock repurchased
 
 
 
 
(33,500,073
)
 
 
Preferred stock issued to ESOP
1,217,000

 
1,217

 
 
 
 
Preferred stock released by ESOP
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock converted to common shares
(305,336
)
 
(305
)
 
6,190,932

 
 
Common stock warrants repurchased/exercised
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock issued


 


 
 
 
 
Common stock dividends
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock dividends
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tax benefit from stock incentive compensation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stock incentive compensation expense
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net change in deferred compensation and related plans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net change
911,664


912


8,564,001



Balance March 31, 2014
11,792,859


$
17,179


5,265,726,706


$
9,136

Balance January 1, 2015
11,138,818

 
$
19,213

 
5,170,349,198

 
$
9,136

Net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common stock issued
 
 
 
 
40,259,205

 
 
Common stock repurchased (1)
 
 
 
 
(48,426,207
)
 
 
Preferred stock issued to ESOP
826,598

 
826

 
 
 
 
Preferred stock released by ESOP
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock converted to common shares
(41,313
)
 
(41
)
 
759,429

 
 
Common stock warrants repurchased/exercised
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock issued
80,000

 
2,000

 
 
 
 
Common stock dividends
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock dividends
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tax benefit from stock incentive compensation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stock incentive compensation expense
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net change in deferred compensation and related plans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net change
865,285


2,785


(7,407,573
)


Balance March 31, 2015
12,004,103


$
21,998


5,162,941,625


$
9,136

(1)
For the first three months of 2015, includes $750 million related to a private forward repurchase transaction entered into in first quarter 2015 that settled in second quarter 2015 for 14.0 million shares of common stock.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


70



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  

 
  
 
  
 
Wells Fargo stockholders' equity
 
 
  
 
  
Additional
paid-in
capital

 
Retained
earnings

 
Cumulative
other
comprehensive
income

 
Treasury
stock

 
Unearned
ESOP
shares

 
Total
Wells Fargo
stockholders'
equity

 
Noncontrolling
interests

 
Total
equity

60,296

 
92,361

 
1,386

 
(8,104
)
 
(1,200
)
 
170,142

 
866

 
171,008

 
 
5,893

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5,893

 
182

 
6,075

 
 
 
 
1,366

 
 
 
 
 
1,366

 
79

 
1,445

(1
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1
)
 
(312
)
 
(313
)
(185
)
 


 
 
 
1,179

 
 
 
994

 
 
 
994

500

 
 
 
 
 
(1,525
)
 
 
 
(1,025
)
 
 
 
(1,025
)
108

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1,325
)
 

 
 
 

(27
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
332

 
305

 
 
 
305

75

 
 
 
 
 
230

 
 
 

 
 
 



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

22

 
(1,601
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1,579
)
 
 
 
(1,579
)
 
 
(285
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(285
)
 
 
 
(285
)
269

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
269

 
 
 
269

374

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
374

 
 
 
374

(813
)
 
 
 
 
 
14

 
 
 
(799
)
 
 
 
(799
)
322


4,007


1,366


(102
)

(993
)

5,512


(51
)

5,461

60,618


96,368


2,752


(8,206
)

(2,193
)

175,654


815


176,469

60,537

 
107,040

 
3,518

 
(13,690
)
 
(1,360
)
 
184,394

 
868

 
185,262

 
 
5,804

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5,804

 
80

 
5,884

 
 
 
 
259

 
 
 
 
 
259

 
301

 
560

1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1

 
(81
)
 
(80
)
(342
)
 
 
 
 
 
1,669

 
 
 
1,327

 
 
 
1,327



 
 
 
 
 
(2,592
)
 
 
 
(2,592
)
 
 
 
(2,592
)
74

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(900
)
 

 
 
 

(4
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
45

 
41

 
 
 
41

7

 
 
 
 
 
34

 
 
 

 
 
 

(8
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(8
)
 
 
 
(8
)
(3
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,997

 
 
 
1,997

19

 
(1,824
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1,805
)
 
 
 
(1,805
)
 
 
(344
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(344
)
 
 
 
(344
)
354

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
354

 
 
 
354

376

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
376

 
 
 
376

(1,031
)
 
 
 
 
 
23

 
 
 
(1,008
)
 
 
 
(1,008
)
(557
)

3,636


259


(866
)

(855
)

4,402


300


4,702

59,980


110,676


3,777


(14,556
)

(2,215
)

188,796


1,168


189,964



71



Wells Fargo & Company and Subsidiaries
 
 
 
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
 
 
 
 
Quarter ended March 31,
 
(in millions)
2015

 
2014

Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
Net income before noncontrolling interests
$
5,884

 
6,075

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
  

Provision for credit losses
608

 
325

Changes in fair value of MSRs, MHFS and LHFS carried at fair value
725

 
410

Depreciation, amortization and accretion
727

 
571

Other net gains
(2,301
)
 
(351
)
Stock-based compensation
708

 
692

Excess tax benefits related to stock incentive compensation
(354
)
 
(269
)
Originations of MHFS
(41,628
)
 
(29,798
)
Proceeds from sales of and principal collected on mortgages originated for sale
31,266

 
26,480

Proceeds from sales of and principal collected on LHFS
6

 
121

Purchases of LHFS
(23
)
 
(96
)
Net change in:
 
 
  

Trading assets
5,777

 
4,190

Deferred income taxes
(435
)
 
408

Accrued interest receivable
(300
)
 
(139
)
Accrued interest payable
76

 
221

Other assets
(2,053
)
 
(3,545
)
Other accrued expenses and liabilities
3,832

 
(2,454
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
2,515

 
2,841

Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
Net change in:
  
 
  
Federal funds sold, securities purchased under resale agreements and other short-term investments
(33,026
)
 
(8,878
)
Available-for-sale securities:
 
 
 
Sales proceeds
4,230

 
877

Prepayments and maturities
7,004

 
7,709

Purchases
(14,634
)
 
(6,178
)
Held-to-maturity securities:
 
 
 
Paydowns and maturities
1,204

 
1,566

Purchases
(8,068
)
 
(7,276
)
Nonmarketable equity investments:
 
 
 
Sales proceeds
598

 
943

Purchases
(281
)
 
(945
)
Loans:
 
 
 
Loans originated by banking subsidiaries, net of principal collected
(2,584
)
 
(10,628
)
Proceeds from sales (including participations) of loans held for investment
2,596

 
3,592

Purchases (including participations) of loans
(1,109
)
 
(1,189
)
Principal collected on nonbank entities’ loans
2,328

 
3,266

Loans originated by nonbank entities
(2,223
)
 
(2,936
)
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed assets and short sales
1,874

 
2,212

Net cash from purchases and sales of MSRs
(21
)
 
(40
)
Other, net
(812
)
 
(320
)
Net cash used by investing activities
(42,924
)
 
(18,225
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
Net change in:
  

 
  

Deposits
28,591

 
15,399

Short-term borrowings
14,174

 
3,808

Long-term debt:
 
 
  

Proceeds from issuance
5,286

 
3,110

Repayment
(5,640
)
 
(4,214
)
Preferred stock:
 
 
  

Proceeds from issuance
1,997

 

Cash dividends paid
(364
)
 
(352
)
Common stock:
 
 
  

Proceeds from issuance
614

 
617

Repurchased
(2,592
)
 
(1,025
)
Cash dividends paid
(1,762
)
 
(1,545
)
Excess tax benefits related to stock incentive compensation
354

 
269

Net change in noncontrolling interests
(47
)
 
(923
)
Other, net
20

 
52

Net cash provided by financing activities
40,631

 
15,196

Net change in cash and due from banks
222

 
(188
)
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period
19,571

 
19,919

Cash and due from banks at end of period
$
19,793

 
19,731

Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
 
 
 
Cash paid for interest
$
901

 
776

Cash paid for income taxes
352

 
81


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. See Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) for noncash activities.

72


See the Glossary of Acronyms at the end of this Report for terms used throughout the Financial Statements and related Notes.
 
Note 1:  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Wells Fargo & Company is a diversified financial services company. We provide banking, insurance, trust and investments, mortgage banking, investment banking, retail banking, brokerage, and consumer and commercial finance through banking stores, the internet and other distribution channels to consumers, businesses and institutions in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and in foreign countries. When we refer to “Wells Fargo,” “the Company,” “we,” “our” or “us,” we mean Wells Fargo & Company and Subsidiaries (consolidated). Wells Fargo & Company (the Parent) is a financial holding company and a bank holding company. We also hold a majority interest in a real estate investment trust, which has publicly traded preferred stock outstanding.
Our accounting and reporting policies conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and practices in the financial services industry. For discussion of our significant accounting policies, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (2014 Form 10-K). There were no material changes to these policies in first quarter 2015. To prepare the financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management must make estimates based on assumptions about future economic and market conditions (for example, unemployment, market liquidity, real estate prices, etc.) that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and income and expenses during the reporting period and the related disclosures. Although our estimates contemplate current conditions and how we expect them to change in the future, it is reasonably possible that actual conditions could be worse than anticipated in those estimates, which could materially affect our results of operations and financial condition. Management has made significant estimates in several areas, including allowance for credit losses and purchased credit-impaired (PCI) loans (Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses)), valuations of residential mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) (Note 7 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) and Note 8 (Mortgage Banking Activities)) and financial instruments (Note 13 (Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities)), and income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
These unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the periods presented. These adjustments are of a normal recurring nature, unless otherwise disclosed in this Form 10-Q. The results of operations in the interim financial statements do not necessarily indicate the results that may be expected for the full year. The interim financial information should be read in conjunction with our 2014 Form 10-K.
 
Accounting Standards Adopted in 2015
In first quarter 2015, we adopted the following new accounting guidance:

Accounting Standards Update (ASU or Update) 2014-11, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures;
 
ASU 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity; and
ASU 2014-01, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects.

ASU 2014-11 requires repurchase-to-maturity transactions to be accounted for as secured borrowings versus sales. The guidance also requires separate accounting for transfers of financial assets that are executed contemporaneously with repurchase agreements. The Update also includes new disclosures for transfers accounted for as sales and for repurchase agreements and similar arrangements, such as classes of collateral pledged for gross obligations and the remaining contractual maturity of repurchase agreements. We adopted the accounting changes in first quarter 2015 with no impact to our consolidated financial statements or disclosures. The collateral and remaining contractual maturity disclosures for repurchase and similar agreements are required in second quarter 2015.

ASU 2014-08 changes the definition and reporting requirements for discontinued operations. Under the new guidance, an entity’s disposal of a component or group of components must be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal is a strategic shift that has or will have a significant effect on the entity’s operations and financial results. We adopted these changes in first quarter 2015 with prospective application. This Update did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2014-01 amends the accounting guidance for investments in affordable housing projects that qualify for the low-income housing tax credits. The Update requires incremental disclosures for all entities that invest in qualified affordable housing projects. Additionally companies may make an accounting election to amortize the cost of their investments in proportion to the tax benefits received if certain criteria are met and present the amortization as a component of income tax expense. We adopted the new disclosure requirements in first quarter 2015 (see Note 6 (Other Assets)) and will continue our previous accounting for these investments rather than make the alternative election to amortize the initial cost of the investments in proportion to the tax benefits received.

Private Share Repurchases
From time to time we enter into private forward repurchase transactions with unrelated third parties to complement our open-market common stock repurchase strategies, to allow us to manage our share repurchases in a manner consistent with our capital plans, currently submitted under the 2015 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR), and to provide an economic benefit to the Company.
Our payments to the counterparties for these contracts are recorded in permanent equity in the quarter paid and are not subject to re-measurement. The classification of the up-front payments as permanent equity assures that we have appropriate repurchase timing consistent with our 2015 Capital Plan, which


73


contemplated a fixed dollar amount available per quarter for share repurchases pursuant to Federal Reserve Board (FRB) supervisory guidance. In return, the counterparty agrees to deliver a variable number of shares based on a per share discount to the volume-weighted average stock price over the contract period. There are no scenarios where the contracts would not either physically settle in shares or allow us to choose the settlement method. Our total number of outstanding shares of common stock is not reduced until settlement of the private share repurchase contract.
 
In January 2015, we entered into a $750 million private forward repurchase contract with an unrelated third party. This contract settled in April 2015 for 14.0 million shares of common stock. We did not have any unsettled private share repurchase contracts at March 31, 2014.
 


SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION  Significant noncash activities are presented below.
 
Quarter ended March 31,
 
(in millions)
2015

 
2014

Trading assets retained from securitization of MHFS
$
6,874

 
5,348

Transfers from loans to MHFS
2,202

 
2,602

Transfers from loans to foreclosed and other assets
911

 
1,216

Transfers from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity securities
4,972

 


SUBSEQUENT EVENTS  We have evaluated the effects of events that have occurred subsequent to March 31, 2015, and there have been no material events that would require recognition in our first quarter 2015 consolidated financial statements or disclosure in the Notes to the consolidated financial statements.



74



Note 2:  Business Combinations
We regularly explore opportunities to acquire financial services companies and businesses. Generally, we do not make a public announcement about an acquisition opportunity until a definitive agreement has been signed. For information on additional contingent consideration related to acquisitions, which is considered to be a guarantee, see Note 10 (Guarantees, Pledged Assets and Collateral).
We completed no acquisitions during first quarter 2015 and had no business combinations pending as of March 31, 2015.

 


Note 3:  Federal Funds Sold, Securities Purchased under Resale Agreements and Other Short-Term Investments
The following table provides the detail of federal funds sold, securities purchased under short-term resale agreements (generally less than one year) and other short-term investments. The majority of interest-earning deposits at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , were held at the Federal Reserve. 
(in millions)
Mar 31,
2015

 
Dec 31
2014

Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements
$
40,161

 
36,856

Interest-earning deposits
250,354

 
219,220

Other short-term investments
802

 
2,353

Total
$
291,317

 
258,429


 
As part of maintaining our memberships in certain clearing organizations, we are required to stand ready to provide liquidity meant to sustain market clearing activity in the event unforeseen events occur or are deemed likely to occur. This includes commitments we have entered into to purchase securities under resale agreements from a central clearing organization that, at its option, require us to provide funding under such agreements. We do not have any outstanding amounts funded, and the amount of our unfunded contractual commitment was $1.9 billion and $2.6 billion as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
We have classified securities purchased under long-term resale agreements (generally one year or more), which totaled $14.8 billion and $14.9 billion at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , respectively, in loans. For additional information on the collateral we receive from other entities under resale agreements and securities borrowings, see the “Offsetting of Resale and Repurchase Agreements and Securities Borrowing and Lending Agreements” section of Note 10 (Guarantees, Pledged Assets and Collateral).





75


Note 4:  Investment Securities
The following table provides the amortized cost and fair value by major categories of available-for-sale securities, which are carried at fair value, and held-to-maturity debt securities, which are
 
carried at amortized cost. The net unrealized gains (losses) for available-for-sale securities are reported on an after-tax basis as a component of cumulative OCI.

(in millions)
Amortized Cost

 
Gross
unrealized
gains

 
Gross
unrealized
losses

 
Fair
value

March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Available-for-sale securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
$
29,782

 
282

 
(33
)
 
30,031

Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
46,973

 
1,342

 
(935
)
 
47,380

Mortgage-backed securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal agencies
100,222

 
3,256

 
(261
)
 
103,217

Residential
7,790

 
951

 
(18
)
 
8,723

Commercial
15,415

 
627

 
(53
)
 
15,989

Total mortgage-backed securities
123,427

 
4,834

 
(332
)
 
127,929

Corporate debt securities
14,508

 
767

 
(142
)
 
15,133

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations (1) 
27,352

 
448

 
(78
)
 
27,722

Other (2)  
5,715

 
213

 
(24
)
 
5,904

Total debt securities
247,757

 
7,886

 
(1,544
)
 
254,099

Marketable equity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Perpetual preferred securities
1,601

 
163

 
(72
)
 
1,692

Other marketable equity securities
318

 
1,495

 
(1
)
 
1,812

Total marketable equity securities
1,919

 
1,658

 
(73
)
 
3,504

Total available-for-sale securities
249,676

 
9,544

 
(1,617
)
 
257,603

Held-to-maturity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
44,244

 
1,441

 
(9
)
 
45,676

Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
2,092

 
30

 
(1
)
 
2,121

Federal agency mortgage-backed securities
14,311

 
182

 
(21
)
 
14,472

Collateralized loans and other debt obligations (1)
1,404

 
1

 
(2
)
 
1,403

Other (2)  
5,082

 
27

 

 
5,109

Total held-to-maturity securities
67,133

 
1,681

 
(33
)
 
68,781

Total
$
316,809

 
11,225

 
(1,650
)
 
326,384

December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Available-for-sale securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
$
25,898

 
44

 
(138
)
 
25,804

Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
43,939

 
1,504

 
(499
)
 
44,944

Mortgage-backed securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal agencies
107,850

 
2,990

 
(751
)
 
110,089

Residential
8,213

 
1,080

 
(24
)
 
9,269

Commercial
16,248

 
803

 
(57
)
 
16,994

Total mortgage-backed securities
132,311

 
4,873

 
(832
)
 
136,352

Corporate debt securities
14,211

 
745

 
(170
)
 
14,786

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations (1)
25,137

 
408

 
(184
)
 
25,361

Other (2)
6,251

 
295

 
(27
)
 
6,519

Total debt securities
247,747

 
7,869

 
(1,850
)
 
253,766

Marketable equity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Perpetual preferred securities
1,622

 
148

 
(70
)
 
1,700

Other marketable equity securities
284

 
1,694

 
(2
)
 
1,976

Total marketable equity securities
1,906

 
1,842

 
(72
)
 
3,676

Total available-for-sale securities
249,653

 
9,711

 
(1,922
)
 
257,442

Held-to-maturity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
40,886

 
670

 
(8
)
 
41,548

Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
1,962

 
27

 

 
1,989

Federal agency mortgage-backed securities
5,476

 
165

 

 
5,641

Collateralized loans and other debt obligations (1)
1,404

 

 
(13
)
 
1,391

Other (2)  
5,755

 
35

 

 
5,790

Total held-to-maturity securities
55,483

 
897

 
(21
)
 
56,359

Total
$
305,136

 
10,608

 
(1,943
)
 
313,801

(1)
The available-for-sale portfolio includes collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) with a cost basis and fair value of $363 million and $487 million, respectively, at March 31, 2015, and $364 million and $500 million, respectively, at December 31, 2014. The held-to-maturity portfolio only includes collateralized loan obligations.
(2)
The “Other” category of available-for-sale securities mostly includes asset-backed securities collateralized by credit cards, student loans, home equity loans and auto leases or loans and cash. Included in the “Other” category of held-to-maturity securities are asset-backed securities collateralized by auto leases or loans and cash with both a cost basis and fair value of $3.1 billion at March 31, 2015, and $3.8 billion at December 31, 2014. Also included in the “Other” category of held-to-maturity securities are asset-backed securities collateralized by dealer floorplan loans with a cost basis of $1.9 billion and fair value of $2.0 billion at both March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

76

Note 4: Investment Securities (continued)

Gross Unrealized Losses and Fair Value
The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of securities in the investment securities portfolio by length of time that individual securities in each category have been in a continuous loss position. Debt securities on which we have taken credit-related OTTI write-downs are categorized as being “less
 
than 12 months” or “12 months or more” in a continuous loss position based on the point in time that the fair value declined to below the cost basis and not the period of time since the credit-related OTTI write-down.

  
Less than 12 months
 
 
12 months or more
 
 
Total
 
(in millions)
Gross
unrealized
losses

 
Fair
value

 
Gross
unrealized
losses

 
Fair
value

 
Gross
unrealized
losses

 
Fair
value

March 31, 2015
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Available-for-sale securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
$
(7
)
 
1,722

 
(26
)
 
4,013

 
(33
)
 
5,735

Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
(579
)
 
17,860

 
(356
)
 
3,685

 
(935
)
 
21,545

Mortgage-backed securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Federal agencies
(73
)
 
14,416

 
(188
)
 
11,410

 
(261
)
 
25,826

Residential
(12
)
 
919

 
(6
)
 
260

 
(18
)
 
1,179

Commercial
(11
)
 
2,312

 
(42
)
 
1,490

 
(53
)
 
3,802

Total mortgage-backed securities
(96
)
 
17,647

 
(236
)
 
13,160

 
(332
)
 
30,807

Corporate debt securities
(91
)
 
1,464

 
(51
)
 
723

 
(142
)
 
2,187

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations
(17
)
 
6,079

 
(61
)
 
3,949

 
(78
)
 
10,028

Other
(20
)
 
843

 
(4
)
 
239

 
(24
)
 
1,082

Total debt securities
(810
)
 
45,615

 
(734
)
 
25,769

 
(1,544
)
 
71,384

Marketable equity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Perpetual preferred securities
(3
)
 
82

 
(69
)
 
615

 
(72
)
 
697

Other marketable equity securities
(1
)
 
16

 

 

 
(1
)
 
16

Total marketable equity securities
(4
)
 
98

 
(69
)
 
615

 
(73
)
 
713

Total available-for-sale securities
(814
)
 
45,713

 
(803
)
 
26,384

 
(1,617
)
 
72,097

Held-to-maturity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
(9
)
 
1,529

 

 

 
(9
)
 
1,529

Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
(1
)
 
298

 

 

 
(1
)
 
298

Federal agency mortgage-backed securities
(21
)
 
8,100

 

 

 
(21
)
 
8,100

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations
(2
)
 
1,229

 

 

 
(2
)
 
1,229

Total held-to-maturity securities
(33
)
 
11,156

 

 

 
(33
)
 
11,156

Total
$
(847
)
 
56,869

 
(803
)
 
26,384

 
(1,650
)
 
83,253

December 31, 2014
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Available-for-sale securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
$
(16
)
 
7,138

 
(122
)
 
5,719

 
(138
)
 
12,857

Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
(198
)
 
10,228

 
(301
)
 
3,725

 
(499
)
 
13,953

Mortgage-backed securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal agencies
(16
)
 
1,706

 
(735
)
 
37,854

 
(751
)
 
39,560

Residential
(18
)
 
946

 
(6
)
 
144

 
(24
)
 
1,090

Commercial
(9
)
 
2,202

 
(48
)
 
1,532

 
(57
)
 
3,734

Total mortgage-backed securities
(43
)
 
4,854

 
(789
)
 
39,530

 
(832
)
 
44,384

Corporate debt securities
(102
)
 
1,674

 
(68
)
 
1,265

 
(170
)
 
2,939

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations
(99
)
 
12,755

 
(85
)
 
3,958

 
(184
)
 
16,713

Other
(23
)
 
708

 
(4
)
 
277

 
(27
)
 
985

Total debt securities
(481
)
 
37,357

 
(1,369
)
 
54,474

 
(1,850
)
 
91,831

Marketable equity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Perpetual preferred securities
(2
)
 
92

 
(68
)
 
633

 
(70
)
 
725

Other marketable equity securities
(2
)
 
41

 

 

 
(2
)
 
41

Total marketable equity securities
(4
)
 
133

 
(68
)
 
633

 
(72
)
 
766

Total available-for-sale securities
(485
)
 
37,490

 
(1,437
)
 
55,107

 
(1,922
)
 
92,597

Held-to-maturity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
(8
)
 
1,889

 

 

 
(8
)
 
1,889

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations
(13
)
 
1,391

 

 

 
(13
)
 
1,391

Total held-to-maturity securities
(21
)
 
3,280

 

 

 
(21
)
 
3,280

Total
$
(506
)
 
40,770

 
(1,437
)
 
55,107

 
(1,943
)
 
95,877



77


We have assessed each security with gross unrealized losses included in the previous table for credit impairment. As part of that assessment we evaluated and concluded that we do not intend to sell any of the securities and that it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell prior to recovery of the amortized cost basis. For debt securities, we evaluate, where necessary, whether credit impairment exists by comparing the present value of the expected cash flows to the securities’ amortized cost basis. For equity securities, we consider numerous factors in determining whether impairment exists, including our intent and ability to hold the securities for a period of time sufficient to recover the cost basis of the securities.
For descriptions of the factors we consider when analyzing securities for impairment, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) and Note 5 (Investment Securities) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K. There have been no material changes to our methodologies for assessing impairment in the first three months of 2015
The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of debt and perpetual preferred investment securities by those rated investment grade and those rated less than investment grade, according to their lowest credit rating by
 
Standard & Poor’s Rating Services (S&P) or Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s). Credit ratings express opinions about the credit quality of a security. Securities rated investment grade, that is those rated BBB- or higher by S&P or Baa3 or higher by Moody’s, are generally considered by the rating agencies and market participants to be low credit risk. Conversely, securities rated below investment grade, labeled as “speculative grade” by the rating agencies, are considered to be distinctively higher credit risk than investment grade securities. We have also included securities not rated by S&P or Moody’s in the table below based on our internal credit grade of the securities (used for credit risk management purposes) equivalent to the credit rating assigned by major credit agencies. The unrealized losses and fair value of unrated securities categorized as investment grade based on internal credit grades were $25 million and $2.1 billion, respectively, at March 31, 2015, and $25 million and $1.6 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2014. If an internal credit grade was not assigned, we categorized the security as non-investment grade.
 

  
Investment grade
 
 
Non-investment grade
 
(in millions)
Gross
unrealized
losses

 
Fair
value

 
Gross
unrealized
losses

 
Fair
value

March 31, 2015
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Available-for-sale securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
$
(33
)
 
5,735

 

 

Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
(895
)
 
21,229

 
(40
)
 
316

Mortgage-backed securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal agencies
(261
)
 
25,826

 

 

Residential
(1
)
 
134

 
(17
)
 
1,045

Commercial
(25
)
 
3,423

 
(28
)
 
379

Total mortgage-backed securities
(287
)
 
29,383

 
(45
)
 
1,424

Corporate debt securities
(16
)
 
1,186

 
(126
)
 
1,001

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations
(68
)
 
9,947

 
(10
)
 
81

Other
(20
)
 
847

 
(4
)
 
235

Total debt securities
(1,319
)
 
68,327

 
(225
)
 
3,057

Perpetual preferred securities
(72
)
 
697

 

 

Total available-for-sale securities
(1,391
)
 
69,024

 
(225
)
 
3,057

Held-to-maturity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
(9
)
 
1,529

 

 

Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
(1
)
 
298

 

 

Federal agency mortgage-backed securities
(21
)
 
8,100

 

 

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations
(2
)
 
1,229

 

 

Total held-to-maturity securities
(33
)
 
11,156

 

 

Total
$
(1,424
)
 
80,180

 
(225
)
 
3,057

December 31, 2014
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Available-for-sale securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
$
(138
)
 
12,857

 

 

Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
(459
)
 
13,600

 
(40
)
 
353

Mortgage-backed securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal agencies
(751
)
 
39,560

 

 

Residential

 
139

 
(24
)
 
951

Commercial
(24
)
 
3,366

 
(33
)
 
368

Total mortgage-backed securities
(775
)
 
43,065

 
(57
)
 
1,319

Corporate debt securities
(39
)
 
1,807

 
(131
)
 
1,132

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations
(172
)
 
16,609

 
(12
)
 
104

Other
(23
)
 
782

 
(4
)
 
203

Total debt securities
(1,606
)
 
88,720

 
(244
)
 
3,111

Perpetual preferred securities
(70
)
 
725

 

 

Total available-for-sale securities
(1,676
)
 
89,445

 
(244
)
 
3,111

Held-to-maturity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
(8
)
 
1,889

 

 

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations
(13
)
 
1,391

 

 

Total held-to-maturity securities
(21
)
 
3,280

 

 

Total
$
(1,697
)
 
92,725

 
(244
)
 
3,111


78

Note 4: Investment Securities (continued)

Contractual Maturities
The following table shows the remaining contractual maturities and contractual weighted-average yields (taxable-equivalent basis) of available-for-sale debt securities. The remaining contractual principal maturities for MBS do not consider
 
prepayments. Remaining expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to prepay obligations before the underlying mortgages mature.
 

  
  
 
 
Remaining contractual maturity
 
  
Total

 
  

 
Within one year
 
 
After one year
through five years
 
 
After five years
through ten years
 
 
After ten years
 
(in millions)

amount

 
Yield

 
Amount

 
Yield

 
Amount

 
Yield

 
Amount

 
Yield

 
Amount

 
Yield

March 31, 2015
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Available-for-sale securities (1)
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
$
30,031

 
1.47
%
 
$
56

 
1.09
%
 
$
26,702

 
1.42
%
 
$
3,273

 
1.85
%
 
$

 
%
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
47,380

 
5.72

 
3,820

 
1.71

 
6,469

 
2.26

 
3,179

 
5.21

 
33,912

 
6.87

Mortgage-backed securities:
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal agencies
103,217

 
3.27

 

 

 
399

 
1.94

 
712

 
3.99

 
102,106

 
3.27

Residential
8,723

 
4.52

 

 

 
14

 
5.10

 
72

 
5.64

 
8,637

 
4.51

Commercial
15,989

 
5.23

 

 

 
60

 
2.63

 

 

 
15,929

 
5.24

Total mortgage-backed securities
127,929

 
3.60

 

 

 
473

 
2.12

 
784

 
4.14

 
126,672

 
3.60

Corporate debt securities
15,133

 
4.89

 
675

 
4.09

 
7,923

 
4.61

 
5,163

 
5.21

 
1,372

 
5.71

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations
27,722

 
1.91

 

 

 
857

 
0.75

 
10,765

 
1.79

 
16,100

 
2.05

Other
5,904

 
1.80

 
275

 
1.53

 
1,277

 
2.59

 
945

 
1.24

 
3,407

 
1.68

Total available-for-sale debt securities at fair value
$
254,099

 
3.59
%
 
$
4,826

 
2.03
%
 
$
43,701

 
2.15
%
 
$
24,109

 
3.04
%
 
$
181,463

 
4.05
%
December 31, 2014
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Available-for-sale securities (1):
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
`
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
$
25,804

 
1.49
%
 
$
181

 
1.47
%
 
$
22,348

 
1.44
%
 
$
3,275

 
1.83
%
 
$

 
%
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
44,944

 
5.66

 
3,568

 
1.71

 
7,050

 
2.19

 
3,235

 
5.13

 
31,091

 
6.96

Mortgage-backed securities:
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal agencies
110,089

 
3.27

 

 

 
276

 
2.86

 
1,011

 
3.38

 
108,802

 
3.27

Residential
9,269

 
4.50

 

 

 
9

 
4.81

 
83

 
5.63

 
9,177

 
4.49

Commercial
16,994

 
5.16

 
1

 
0.28

 
62

 
2.71

 
5

 
1.30

 
16,926

 
5.17

Total mortgage-backed securities
136,352

 
3.59

 
1

 
0.28

 
347

 
2.88

 
1,099

 
3.54

 
134,905

 
3.59

Corporate debt securities
14,786

 
4.90

 
600

 
4.32

 
7,634

 
4.54

 
5,209

 
5.30

 
1,343

 
5.70

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations
25,361

 
1.83

 
23

 
1.95

 
944

 
0.71

 
8,472

 
1.67

 
15,922

 
1.99

Other
6,519

 
1.79

 
274

 
1.55

 
1,452

 
2.56

 
1,020

 
1.32

 
3,773

 
1.64

Total available-for-sale debt securities at fair value
$
253,766

 
3.60
%
 
$
4,647

 
2.03
%
 
$
39,775

 
2.20
%
 
$
22,310

 
3.12
%
 
$
187,034

 
3.99
%
(1)
Weighted-average yields displayed by maturity bucket are weighted based on fair value and predominantly represent contractual coupon rates without effect for any related hedging derivatives.


79


The following table shows the amortized cost and weighted-average yields of held-to-maturity debt securities by contractual maturity.

  
  
 
 
Remaining contractual maturity
 
  
Total

 
  

 
Within one year
 
 
After one year
through five years
 
 
After five years
through ten years
 
 
After ten years
 
(in millions)
amount

 
Yield

 
Amount

 
Yield

 
Amount

 
Yield

 
Amount

 
Yield

 
Amount

 
Yield

March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Held-to-maturity securities (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortized cost:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
$
44,244

 
2.12
%
 
$

 
%
 
$

 
%
 
$
44,244

 
2.12
%
 
$

 
%
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
2,092

 
5.70

 

 

 

 

 
65

 
7.70

 
2,027

 
5.64

Federal agency mortgage-backed securities
14,311

 
3.47

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
14,311

 
3.47

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations
1,404

 
1.97

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
1,404

 
1.97

Other
5,082

 
1.56

 
200

 
1.62

 
3,553

 
1.62

 
1,329

 
1.40

 

 

Total held-to-maturity debt securities at amortized cost
$
67,133

 
2.47
%
 
$
200

 
1.62
%
 
$
3,553

 
1.62
%
 
$
45,638

 
2.11
%
 
$
17,742

 
3.60
%
December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Held-to-maturity securities (1):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortized cost:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
$
40,886

 
2.12
%
 
$

 
%
 
$

 
%
 
$
40,886

 
2.12
%
 
$

 
%
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
1,962

 
5.60

 

 

 

 

 
9

 
6.60

 
1,953

 
5.59

Federal agency mortgage-backed securities
5,476

 
3.89

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
5,476

 
3.89

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations
1,404

 
1.96

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
1,404

 
1.96

Other
5,755

 
1.64

 
192

 
1.61

 
4,214

 
1.72

 
1,349

 
1.41

 

 

Total held-to-maturity debt securities at amortized cost
$
55,483

 
2.37
%
 
$
192

 
1.61
%
 
$
4,214

 
1.72
%
 
$
42,244

 
2.10
%
 
$
8,833

 
3.96
%
(1)
Weighted-average yields displayed by maturity bucket are weighted based on amortized cost and predominantly represent contractual coupon rates.

The following table shows the fair value of held-to-maturity debt securities by contractual maturity.
 
 

  
  

 
Remaining contractual maturity
 
  
Total

 
Within one year

 
After one year
through five years

 
After five years
through ten years

 
After ten years

(in millions)
amount

 
Amount

 
Amount

 
Amount

 
Amount

March 31, 2015
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Held-to-maturity securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Fair value:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
$
45,676

 
$

 
$

 
$
45,676

 
$

Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
2,121

 

 

 
67

 
2,054

Federal agency mortgage-backed securities
14,472

 

 

 

 
14,472

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations
1,403

 

 

 

 
1,403

Other
5,109

 
201

 
3,574

 
1,334

 

Total held-to-maturity debt securities at fair value
$
68,781

 
$
201

 
$
3,574

 
$
47,077

 
$
17,929

December 31, 2014
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Held-to-maturity securities:
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair value:
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
$
41,548

 
$

 
$

 
$
41,548

 
$

Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
1,989

 

 

 
9

 
1,980

Federal agency mortgage-backed securities
5,641

 

 

 

 
5,641

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations
1,391

 

 

 

 
1,391

Other
5,790

 
193

 
4,239

 
1,358

 

Total held-to-maturity debt securities at fair value
$
56,359

 
$
193

 
$
4,239

 
$
42,915

 
$
9,012


80

Note 4: Investment Securities (continued)

Realized Gains and Losses
The following table shows the gross realized gains and losses on sales and OTTI write-downs related to the available-for-sale securities portfolio, which includes marketable equity securities,
as well as net realized gains and losses on nonmarketable equity investments (see Note 6 (Other Assets)). 
 




  
Quarter ended March 31,
 
(in millions)
2015

 
2014

Gross realized gains
$
348

 
391

Gross realized losses
(20
)
 
(3
)
OTTI write-downs
(31
)
 
(9
)
Net realized gains from available-for-sale securities
297

 
379

Net realized gains from nonmarketable equity investments
351

 
551

Net realized gains from debt securities and equity investments
$
648

 
930


Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
The following table shows the detail of total OTTI write-downs included in earnings for available-for-sale debt securities, marketable equity securities and nonmarketable equity investments. There were no OTTI write-downs on held-to-maturity securities during first quarter 2015 and 2014.
 



 
Quarter ended March 31,
 
(in millions)
2015

 
2014

OTTI write-downs included in earnings
  

 
  

Debt securities:
  
 
  
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
$
16

 

Mortgage-backed securities:
 
 
 
Residential
15

 
5

Commercial

 
2

Total debt securities
31

 
7

Equity securities:
 
 
 
Marketable equity securities:
 
 
 
Other marketable equity securities

 
2

Total marketable equity securities

 
2

Total investment securities
31

 
9

Nonmarketable equity investments
42

 
126

Total OTTI write-downs included in earnings
$
73

 
135



81


Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired Debt Securities
The following table shows the detail of OTTI write-downs on available-for-sale debt securities included in earnings and the related changes in OCI for the same securities.

  
Quarter ended March 31,
 
(in millions)
2015

 
2014

OTTI on debt securities
  

 
  

Recorded as part of gross realized losses:
  

 
  

Credit-related OTTI
$
20

 
7

Intent-to-sell OTTI
11

 

Total recorded as part of gross realized losses
31

 
7

Changes to OCI for losses (reversal of losses) in non-credit-related OTTI (1):
 
 
 
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
(1
)
 

Residential mortgage-backed securities
(21
)
 
(9
)
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
(15
)
 
(12
)
Total changes to OCI for non-credit-related OTTI
(37
)
 
(21
)
Total OTTI losses (reversal of losses) recorded on debt securities
$
(6
)
 
(14
)
(1)
Represents amounts recorded to OCI for impairment, due to factors other than credit, on debt securities that have also had credit-related OTTI write-downs during the period. Increases represent initial or subsequent non-credit-related OTTI on debt securities. Decreases represent partial to full reversal of impairment due to recoveries in the fair value of securities due to non-credit factors.
 
The following table presents a rollforward of the OTTI credit loss that has been recognized in earnings as a write-down of available-for-sale debt securities we still own (referred to as "credit-impaired" debt securities) and do not intend to sell. Recognized credit loss represents the difference between the present value of expected future cash flows discounted using the security’s current effective interest rate and the amortized cost basis of the security prior to considering credit loss.
 





 

  
Quarter ended March 31,
 
(in millions)
2015

 
2014

Credit loss recognized, beginning of year
$
1,025

 
1,171

Additions:
 
 
 
For securities with previous credit impairments
20

 
7

Total additions
20

 
7

Reductions:
 
 
 
For securities sold, matured, or intended/required to be sold
(14
)
 
(29
)
For recoveries of previous credit impairments (1)
(2
)
 
(6
)
Total reductions
(16
)
 
(35
)
Credit loss recognized, end of year
$
1,029

 
1,143

(1)
Recoveries of previous credit impairments result from increases in expected cash flows subsequent to credit loss recognition. Such recoveries are reflected prospectively as interest yield adjustments using the effective interest method.


82


Note 5:  Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses 
The following table presents total loans outstanding by portfolio segment and class of financing receivable. Outstanding balances include a total net reduction of $4.2 billion and $4.5 billion at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively, for
 
unearned income, net deferred loan fees, and unamortized discounts and premiums.

(in millions)
Mar 31,
2015

 
Dec 31,
2014

Commercial:
  

 
  

Commercial and industrial
$
271,088

 
271,795

Real estate mortgage
111,848

 
111,996

Real estate construction
19,981

 
18,728

Lease financing
12,382

 
12,307

Total commercial
415,299

 
414,826

Consumer:
 
 
 
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
265,213

 
265,386

Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage
57,839

 
59,717

Credit card
30,078

 
31,119

Automobile
56,339

 
55,740

Other revolving credit and installment
36,463

 
35,763

Total consumer
445,932

 
447,725

Total loans
$
861,231

 
862,551


Our foreign loans are reported by respective class of financing receivable in the table above. Substantially all of our foreign loan portfolio is commercial loans. Loans are classified as foreign primarily based on whether the borrower’s primary
 
address is outside of the United States. The following table presents total commercial foreign loans outstanding by class of financing receivable.

(in millions)
Mar 31,
2015

 
Dec 31,
2014

Commercial foreign loans:
 
 
 
Commercial and industrial
$
45,325

 
44,707

Real estate mortgage
5,171

 
4,776

Real estate construction
241

 
218

Lease financing
307

 
336

Total commercial foreign loans
$
51,044

 
50,037


Loan Purchases, Sales, and Transfers
The following table summarizes the proceeds paid or received for purchases and sales of loans and transfers from loans held for investment to mortgages/loans held for sale at lower of cost or fair value. This loan activity primarily includes loans purchased and sales of whole loan or participating interests, whereby we
 
receive or transfer a portion of a loan after origination. The table excludes PCI loans and loans recorded at fair value, including loans originated for sale because their loan activity normally does not impact the allowance for credit losses.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Quarter ended March 31,
 
  
2015
 
 
2014
 
(in millions)
Commercial

 
Consumer

 
Total

 
Commercial

 
Consumer

 
Total

Purchases (1)
$
1,091

 

 
1,091

 
1,014

 
168

 
1,182

Sales
(206
)
 
(29
)
 
(235
)
 
(1,641
)
 
(50
)
 
(1,691
)
Transfers to MHFS/LHFS (1)
(7
)
 
(2
)
 
(9
)
 
(35
)
 
(5
)
 
(40
)
(1)
The “Purchases” and “Transfers to MHFS/LHFS" categories exclude activity in government insured/guaranteed real estate 1-4 family first mortgage loans. As servicer, we are able to buy delinquent insured/guaranteed loans out of the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) pools. These loans are predominantly insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Accordingly, these loans have limited impact on the allowance for loan losses. On a net basis, such purchases net of transfers to MHFS were $1.1 billion and $1.5 billion for first quarter 2015 and 2014, respectively.

83


Commitments to Lend
A commitment to lend is a legally binding agreement to lend funds to a customer, usually at a stated interest rate, if funded, and for specific purposes and time periods. We generally require a fee to extend such commitments. Certain commitments are subject to loan agreements with covenants regarding the financial performance of the customer or borrowing base formulas on an ongoing basis that must be met before we are required to fund the commitment. We may reduce or cancel consumer commitments, including home equity lines and credit card lines, in accordance with the contracts and applicable law.
We may, as a representative for other lenders, advance funds or provide for the issuance of letters of credit under syndicated loan or letter of credit agreements. Any advances are generally repaid in less than a week and would normally require default of both the customer and another lender to expose us to loss. These temporary advance arrangements totaled approximately $89 billion at March 31, 2015 and $87 billion at December 31, 2014.
We issue commercial letters of credit to assist customers in purchasing goods or services, typically for international trade. At March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, we had $1.0 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively, of outstanding issued commercial letters of credit. We also originate multipurpose lending commitments under which borrowers have the option to draw on the facility for different purposes in one of several forms, including a standby letter of credit. See Note 10 (Guarantees, Pledged Assets and Collateral) for additional information on standby letters of credit. 
When we make commitments, we are exposed to credit risk. The maximum credit risk for these commitments will generally be lower than the contractual amount because a significant portion of these commitments are expected to expire without being used by the customer. In addition, we manage the potential risk in commitments to lend by limiting the total amount of commitments, both by individual customer and in total, by monitoring the size and maturity structure of these commitments and by applying the same credit standards for these commitments as for all of our credit activities.
 
For loans and commitments to lend, we generally require collateral or a guarantee. We may require various types of collateral, including commercial and consumer real estate, autos, other short-term liquid assets such as accounts receivable or inventory and long-lived assets, such as equipment and other business assets. Collateral requirements for each loan or commitment may vary based on the loan product and our assessment of a customer’s credit risk according to the specific credit underwriting, including credit terms and structure.
The contractual amount of our unfunded credit commitments, including unissued standby and commercial letters of credit, is summarized by portfolio segment and class of financing receivable in the following table. The table excludes the standby and commercial letters of credit and temporary advance arrangements described above.
(in millions)
Mar 31,
2015

 
Dec 31,
2014

Commercial:
  

 
  

Commercial and industrial
$
280,803

 
278,093

Real estate mortgage
6,359

 
6,134

Real estate construction
15,692

 
15,587

Lease financing
3

 
3

Total commercial
302,857

 
299,817

Consumer:
 
 
 
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
37,487

 
32,055

Real estate 1-4 family
junior lien mortgage
45,196

 
45,492

Credit card
96,437

 
95,062

Other revolving credit and installment
25,635

 
24,816

Total consumer
204,755

 
197,425

Total unfunded
credit commitments
$
507,612

 
497,242




84

Note 5: Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (continued)

Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses consists of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded credit commitments. Changes in the allowance for credit losses were:
  
Three months ended March 31,
 
(in millions)
2015

 
2014

Balance, beginning of period
13,169

 
14,971

Provision for credit losses
608

 
325

Interest income on certain impaired loans (1)
(52
)
 
(56
)
Loan charge-offs:
 
 
 
Commercial:
 
 
 
Commercial and industrial
(133
)
 
(163
)
Real estate mortgage
(23
)
 
(20
)
Real estate construction
(1
)
 
(1
)
Lease financing
(3
)
 
(4
)
Total commercial
(160
)
 
(188
)
Consumer:
 
 
 
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
(130
)
 
(223
)
Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage
(179
)
 
(249
)
Credit card
(278
)
 
(267
)
Automobile
(195
)
 
(180
)
Other revolving credit and installment
(154
)
 
(177
)
Total consumer
(936
)
 
(1,096
)
Total loan charge-offs
(1,096
)
 
(1,284
)
Loan recoveries:
 
 
 
Commercial:
 
 
 
Commercial and industrial
69

 
114

Real estate mortgage
34

 
42

Real estate construction
10

 
24

Lease financing
3

 
3

Total commercial
116

 
183

Consumer:
 
 
 
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
47

 
53

Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage
56

 
57

Credit card
39

 
36

Automobile
94

 
90

Other revolving credit and installment
36

 
40

Total consumer
272

 
276

Total loan recoveries
388

 
459

Net loan charge-offs (2)
(708
)
 
(825
)
Allowances related to business combinations/other
(4
)
 
(1
)
Balance, end of period
13,013

 
14,414

Components:
 
 
 
Allowance for loan losses
12,176

 
13,695

Allowance for unfunded credit commitments
837

 
719

Allowance for credit losses (3)
13,013

 
14,414

Net loan charge-offs (annualized) as a percentage of average total loans (2)
0.33

 
0.41

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans (3)
1.41

 
1.66

Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans (3)
1.51

 
1.74

(1)
Certain impaired loans with an allowance calculated by discounting expected cash flows using the loan’s effective interest rate over the remaining life of the loan recognize reductions in the allowance as interest income.
(2)
For PCI loans, charge-offs are only recorded to the extent that losses exceed the purchase accounting estimates.
(3)
The allowance for credit losses includes $9 million and $21 million at March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, related to PCI loans acquired from Wachovia. Loans acquired from Wachovia are included in total loans net of related purchase accounting net write-downs.



85


The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for credit losses by our commercial and consumer portfolio segments.

  
  

 
  

 
2015

 
  

 
  

 
2014

(in millions)
Commercial

 
Consumer

 
Total

 
Commercial

 
Consumer

 
Total

Quarter ended March 31,
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Balance, beginning of period
$
6,377

 
6,792

 
13,169

 
6,103

 
8,868

 
14,971

Provision for credit losses
9

 
599

 
608

 
263

 
62

 
325

Interest income on certain impaired loans
(5
)
 
(47
)
 
(52
)
 
(6
)
 
(50
)
 
(56
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loan charge-offs
(160
)
 
(936
)
 
(1,096
)
 
(188
)
 
(1,096
)
 
(1,284
)
Loan recoveries
116

 
272

 
388

 
183

 
276

 
459

Net loan charge-offs
(44
)
 
(664
)
 
(708
)
 
(5
)
 
(820
)
 
(825
)
Allowance related to business combinations/other
(4
)
 

 
(4
)
 
(1
)
 

 
(1
)
Balance, end of period
$
6,333

 
6,680

 
13,013

 
6,354

 
8,060

 
14,414


The following table disaggregates our allowance for credit losses and recorded investment in loans by impairment methodology.

  
Allowance for credit losses
 
 
Recorded investment in loans
 
(in millions)
Commercial

 
Consumer

 
Total

 
Commercial

 
Consumer

 
Total

March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Collectively evaluated (1)
$
5,550

 
3,705

 
9,255

 
410,519

 
403,241

 
813,760

Individually evaluated (2)
774

 
2,975

 
3,749

 
3,702

 
21,380

 
25,082

PCI (3)
9

 

 
9

 
1,078

 
21,311

 
22,389

Total
$
6,333

 
6,680

 
13,013

 
415,299

 
445,932

 
861,231

December 31, 2014
 
Collectively evaluated (1)
$
5,482

 
3,706

 
9,188

 
409,560

 
404,263

 
813,823

Individually evaluated (2)
884

 
3,086

 
3,970

 
3,759

 
21,649

 
25,408

PCI (3)
11

 

 
11

 
1,507

 
21,813

 
23,320

Total
$
6,377

 
6,792

 
13,169

 
414,826

 
447,725

 
862,551

(1)
Represents loans collectively evaluated for impairment in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 450-20,Loss Contingencies(formerly FAS 5), and pursuant to amendments by ASU 2010-20 regarding allowance for non-impaired loans.
(2)
Represents loans individually evaluated for impairment in accordance with ASC 310-10, Receivables (formerly FAS 114), and pursuant to amendments by ASU 2010-20 regarding allowance for impaired loans.
(3)
Represents the allowance and related loan carrying value determined in accordance with ASC 310-30, Receivables – Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality (formerly SOP 03-3) and pursuant to amendments by ASU 2010-20 regarding allowance for PCI loans.

Credit Quality
We monitor credit quality by evaluating various attributes and utilize such information in our evaluation of the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses. The following sections provide the credit quality indicators we most closely monitor. The credit quality indicators are generally based on information as of our financial statement date, with the exception of updated Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) scores and updated loan-to-value (LTV)/combined LTV (CLTV), which are obtained at least quarterly. Generally, these indicators are updated in the second month of each quarter, with updates no older than December 31, 2014. See the “Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans” section of this Note for credit quality information on our PCI portfolio.
 
 
COMMERCIAL CREDIT QUALITY INDICATORS  In addition to monitoring commercial loan concentration risk, we manage a consistent process for assessing commercial loan credit quality. Generally, commercial loans are subject to individual risk assessment using our internal borrower and collateral quality ratings. Our ratings are aligned to Pass and Criticized categories. The Criticized category includes Special Mention, Substandard, and Doubtful categories which are defined by bank regulatory agencies.
The following table provides a breakdown of outstanding commercial loans by risk category. Of the $7.5 billion in criticized commercial real estate (CRE) loans at March 31, 2015, $1.5 billion has been placed on nonaccrual status and written down to net realizable collateral value. CRE loans have a high level of monitoring in place to manage these assets and mitigate loss exposure.
 


86

Note 5: Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (continued)

(in millions)
Commercial
and
industrial

 
Real
estate
mortgage

 
Real
estate
construction

 
Lease
financing

 
Total

March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By risk category:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pass
$
254,884

 
104,252

 
19,025

 
11,956

 
390,117

Criticized
16,135

 
6,710

 
833

 
426

 
24,104

Total commercial loans (excluding PCI)
271,019

 
110,962

 
19,858

 
12,382

 
414,221

Total commercial PCI loans (carrying value)
69

 
886

 
123

 

 
1,078

Total commercial loans
$
271,088

 
111,848

 
19,981

 
12,382

 
415,299

December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By risk category:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pass
$
255,611

 
103,319

 
17,661

 
11,723

 
388,314

Criticized
16,109

 
7,416

 
896

 
584

 
25,005

Total commercial loans (excluding PCI)
271,720

 
110,735

 
18,557

 
12,307

 
413,319

Total commercial PCI loans (carrying value)
75

 
1,261

 
171

 

 
1,507

Total commercial loans
$
271,795

 
111,996

 
18,728

 
12,307

 
414,826


The following table provides past due information for commercial loans, which we monitor as part of our credit risk management practices.
 
 

(in millions)
Commercial
and
industrial

 
Real
estate
mortgage

 
Real
estate
construction

 
Lease
financing

 
Total

March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By delinquency status:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current-29 DPD and still accruing
$
269,892

 
109,300

 
19,666

 
12,334

 
411,192

30-89 DPD and still accruing
433

 
295

 
10

 
25

 
763

90+ DPD and still accruing
31

 
43

 

 

 
74

Nonaccrual loans
663

 
1,324

 
182

 
23

 
2,192

Total commercial loans (excluding PCI)
271,019

 
110,962

 
19,858

 
12,382

 
414,221

Total commercial PCI loans (carrying value)
69

 
886

 
123

 

 
1,078

Total commercial loans
$
271,088

 
111,848

 
19,981

 
12,382

 
415,299

December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By delinquency status:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current-29 DPD and still accruing
$
270,624

 
109,032

 
18,345

 
12,251

 
410,252

30-89 DPD and still accruing
527

 
197

 
25

 
32

 
781

90+ DPD and still accruing
31

 
16

 

 

 
47

Nonaccrual loans
538

 
1,490

 
187

 
24

 
2,239

Total commercial loans (excluding PCI)
271,720

 
110,735

 
18,557

 
12,307

 
413,319

Total commercial PCI loans (carrying value)
75

 
1,261

 
171

 

 
1,507

Total commercial loans
$
271,795

 
111,996

 
18,728

 
12,307

 
414,826



87


CONSUMER CREDIT QUALITY INDICATORS  We have various classes of consumer loans that present unique risks. Loan delinquency, FICO credit scores and LTV for loan types are common credit quality indicators that we monitor and utilize in our evaluation of the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses for the consumer portfolio segment.
 
Many of our loss estimation techniques used for the allowance for credit losses rely on delinquency-based models; therefore, delinquency is an important indicator of credit quality and the establishment of our allowance for credit losses. The following table provides the outstanding balances of our consumer portfolio by delinquency status.

(in millions)
Real estate
1-4 family
first
mortgage

 
Real estate
1-4 family
junior lien
mortgage

 
Credit
card

 
Automobile

 
Other
revolving
credit and
installment

 
Total

March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By delinquency status:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current-29 DPD
$
210,505

 
56,460

 
29,401

 
55,340

 
36,085

 
387,791

30-59 DPD
2,065

 
337

 
188

 
792

 
169

 
3,551

60-89 DPD
852

 
198

 
137

 
150

 
95

 
1,432

90-119 DPD
417

 
116

 
124

 
51

 
81

 
789

120-179 DPD
511

 
170

 
227

 
5

 
18

 
931

180+ DPD
4,122

 
470

 
1

 
1

 
15

 
4,609

Government insured/guaranteed loans (1)
25,518

 

 

 

 

 
25,518

Total consumer loans (excluding PCI)
243,990

 
57,751

 
30,078

 
56,339

 
36,463

 
424,621

Total consumer PCI loans (carrying value)
21,223

 
88

 

 

 

 
21,311

Total consumer loans
$
265,213

 
57,839

 
30,078

 
56,339

 
36,463

 
445,932

December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By delinquency status:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current-29 DPD
$
208,642

 
58,182

 
30,356

 
54,365

 
35,356

 
386,901

30-59 DPD
2,415

 
398

 
239

 
1,056

 
180

 
4,288

60-89 DPD
993

 
220

 
160

 
235

 
111

 
1,719

90-119 DPD
488

 
158

 
136

 
78

 
82

 
942

120-179 DPD
610

 
194

 
227

 
5

 
21

 
1,057

180+ DPD
4,258

 
464

 
1

 
1

 
13

 
4,737

Government insured/guaranteed loans (1)
26,268

 

 

 

 

 
26,268

Total consumer loans (excluding PCI)
243,674

 
59,616

 
31,119

 
55,740

 
35,763

 
425,912

Total consumer PCI loans (carrying value)
21,712

 
101

 

 

 

 
21,813

Total consumer loans
$
265,386

 
59,717

 
31,119

 
55,740

 
35,763

 
447,725

(1)
Represents loans whose repayments are predominantly insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA and student loans whose repayments are predominantly guaranteed by agencies on behalf of the U.S. Department of Education under the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP). Loans insured/guaranteed by the FHA/VA and 90+ DPD totaled $15.0 billion at March 31, 2015, compared with $16.2 billion at December 31, 2014.

Of the $6.3 billion of consumer loans not government insured/guaranteed that are 90 days or more past due at March 31, 2015, $767 million was accruing, compared with $6.7 billion past due and $873 million accruing at December 31, 2014.
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage loans 180 days or more past due totaled $4.1 billion, or 1.7% of total first mortgages (excluding PCI), at March 31, 2015, compared with $4.3 billion, or 1.7%, at December 31, 2014.
 
The following table provides a breakdown of our consumer portfolio by updated FICO. We obtain FICO scores at loan origination and the scores are updated at least quarterly. The majority of our portfolio is underwritten with a FICO score of 680 and above. FICO is not available for certain loan types and may not be obtained if we deem it unnecessary due to strong collateral and other borrower attributes, primarily security-based loans of $6.1 billion at March 31, 2015, and $5.9 billion at December 31, 2014.


88

Note 5: Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (continued)

(in millions)
Real estate
1-4 family
first
mortgage

 
Real estate
1-4 family
junior lien
mortgage

 
Credit
card

 
Automobile

 
Other
revolving
credit and
installment

 
Total

March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By updated FICO:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
< 600
$
10,734

 
3,902

 
2,744

 
8,814

 
929

 
27,123

600-639
7,790

 
2,732

 
2,582

 
6,256

 
1,048

 
20,408

640-679
13,725

 
5,169

 
4,800

 
9,477

 
2,372

 
35,543

680-719
24,563

 
8,673

 
6,087

 
10,181

 
4,344

 
53,848

720-759
35,288

 
11,884

 
6,203

 
7,606

 
5,840

 
66,821

760-799
82,421

 
17,151

 
4,938

 
7,254

 
7,810

 
119,574

800+
41,069

 
7,352

 
2,498

 
6,226

 
6,008

 
63,153

No FICO available
2,882

 
888

 
226

 
525

 
2,045

 
6,566

FICO not required

 

 

 

 
6,067

 
6,067

Government insured/guaranteed loans (1)
25,518

 

 

 

 

 
25,518

Total consumer loans (excluding PCI)
243,990

 
57,751

 
30,078

 
56,339

 
36,463

 
424,621

Total consumer PCI loans (carrying value)
21,223

 
88

 

 

 

 
21,311

Total consumer loans
$
265,213

 
57,839

 
30,078

 
56,339

 
36,463

 
445,932

December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


By updated FICO:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

< 600
$
11,166

 
4,001

 
2,639

 
8,825

 
894

 
27,525

600-639
7,866

 
2,794

 
2,588

 
6,236

 
1,058

 
20,542

640-679
13,894

 
5,324

 
4,931

 
9,352

 
2,366

 
35,867

680-719
24,412

 
8,970

 
6,285

 
9,994

 
4,389

 
54,050

720-759
35,490

 
12,171

 
6,407

 
7,475

 
5,896

 
67,439

760-799
82,123

 
17,897

 
5,234

 
7,315

 
7,673

 
120,242

800+
39,219

 
7,581

 
2,758

 
6,184

 
5,819

 
61,561

No FICO available
3,236

 
878

 
277

 
359

 
1,814

 
6,564

FICO not required

 

 

 

 
5,854

 
5,854

Government insured/guaranteed loans (1)
26,268

 

 

 

 

 
26,268

Total consumer loans (excluding PCI)
243,674

 
59,616

 
31,119

 
55,740

 
35,763

 
425,912

Total consumer PCI loans (carrying value)
21,712

 
101

 

 

 

 
21,813

Total consumer loans
$
265,386

 
59,717

 
31,119

 
55,740

 
35,763

 
447,725

(1)
Represents loans whose repayments are predominantly insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA and student loans whose repayments are predominantly guaranteed by agencies on behalf of the U.S. Department of Education under FFELP.
 
LTV refers to the ratio comparing the loan’s unpaid principal balance to the property’s collateral value. CLTV refers to the combination of first mortgage and junior lien mortgage (including unused line amounts for credit line products) ratios. LTVs and CLTVs are updated quarterly using a cascade approach which first uses values provided by automated valuation models (AVMs) for the property. If an AVM is not available, then the value is estimated using the original appraised value adjusted by the change in Home Price Index (HPI) for the property location. If an HPI is not available, the original appraised value is used. The HPI value is normally the only method considered for high value properties, generally with an original value of $1 million or more, as the AVM values have proven less accurate for these properties.
 
The following table shows the most updated LTV and CLTV distribution of the real estate 1-4 family first and junior lien mortgage loan portfolios. We consider the trends in residential real estate markets as we monitor credit risk and establish our allowance for credit losses. In the event of a default, any loss should be limited to the portion of the loan amount in excess of the net realizable value of the underlying real estate collateral value. Certain loans do not have an LTV or CLTV primarily due to industry data availability and portfolios acquired from or serviced by other institutions.


89


  
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
(in millions)
Real estate
1-4 family
first
mortgage
by LTV

 
Real estate
1-4 family
junior lien
mortgage
by CLTV

 
Total

 
Real estate
1-4 family
first
mortgage
by LTV

 
Real estate
1-4 family
junior lien
mortgage
by CLTV

 
Total

By LTV/CLTV:
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

0-60%
$
95,988

 
14,717

 
110,705

 
95,719

 
15,603

 
111,322

60.01-80%
87,147

 
17,427

 
104,574

 
86,112

 
17,651

 
103,763

80.01-100%
25,544

 
13,833

 
39,377

 
25,170

 
14,004

 
39,174

100.01-120% (1)
5,908

 
7,023

 
12,931

 
6,133

 
7,254

 
13,387

> 120% (1)
2,682

 
3,784

 
6,466

 
2,856

 
4,058

 
6,914

No LTV/CLTV available
1,203

 
967

 
2,170

 
1,416

 
1,046

 
2,462

Government insured/guaranteed loans (2)
25,518

 

 
25,518

 
26,268

 

 
26,268

Total consumer loans (excluding PCI)
243,990

 
57,751

 
301,741

 
243,674

 
59,616

 
303,290

Total consumer PCI loans (carrying value)
21,223

 
88

 
21,311

 
21,712

 
101

 
21,813

Total consumer loans
$
265,213

 
57,839

 
323,052

 
265,386

 
59,717

 
325,103

(1)
Reflects total loan balances with LTV/CLTV amounts in excess of 100%. In the event of default, the loss content would generally be limited to only the amount in excess of 100% LTV/CLTV.
(2)
Represents loans whose repayments are predominantly insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA.
 
NONACCRUAL LOANS  The following table provides loans on nonaccrual status. PCI loans are excluded from this table because they continue to earn interest from accretable yield, independent of performance in accordance with their contractual terms.
(in millions)
Mar 31,
2015

 
Dec 31,
2014

Commercial:
  
 
  
Commercial and industrial
$
663

 
538

Real estate mortgage
1,324

 
1,490

Real estate construction
182

 
187

Lease financing
23

 
24

Total commercial (1)
2,192

 
2,239

Consumer:
 
 
 
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage (2)
8,345

 
8,583

Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage
1,798

 
1,848

Automobile
133

 
137

Other revolving credit and installment
42

 
41

Total consumer
10,318

 
10,609

Total nonaccrual loans
(excluding PCI)
$
12,510

 
12,848

(1)
Includes LHFS of $1 million at both March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014
(2)
Includes MHFS of $144 million and $177 million at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively.

 
LOANS IN PROCESS OF FORECLOSURE  Our recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in process of foreclosure was $12.4 billion and $12.7 billion at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, which included $6.5 billion and $6.6 billion, respectively, of loans that are government insured/guaranteed. We commence the foreclosure process on consumer real estate loans when a borrower becomes 120 days delinquent in accordance with Consumer Finance Protection Bureau Guidelines. Foreclosure procedures and timelines vary depending on whether the property address resides in a judicial or non-judicial state. Judicial states require the foreclosure to be processed through the state’s courts while non-judicial states are processed without court intervention. Foreclosure timelines vary according to state law.




90

Note 5: Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (continued)

LOANS 90 DAYS OR MORE PAST DUE AND STILL ACCRUING  Certain loans 90 days or more past due as to interest or principal are still accruing, because they are (1) well-secured and in the process of collection or (2) real estate 1‑4 family mortgage loans or consumer loans exempt under regulatory rules from being classified as nonaccrual until later delinquency, usually 120 days past due. PCI loans of $3.6 billion at March 31, 2015, and $3.7 billion at December 31, 2014, are not included in these past due and still accruing loans even though they are 90 days or more contractually past due. These PCI loans are considered to be accruing because they continue to earn interest from accretable yield, independent of performance in accordance with their contractual terms.
The following table shows non-PCI loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing by class for loans not government insured/guaranteed.
(in millions)
Mar 31, 2015

 
Dec 31, 2014

Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing:
 
 
 
Total (excluding PCI):
$
16,344

 
17,810

Less: FHA insured/guaranteed by the VA (1)(2)
15,453

 
16,827

Less: Student loans guaranteed under the FFELP (3)
50

 
63

Total, not government insured/guaranteed
$
841

 
920

By segment and class, not government insured/guaranteed:
 
 
 
Commercial:
 
 
 
Commercial and industrial
$
31

 
31

Real estate mortgage
43

 
16

Real estate construction

 

Total commercial
74

 
47

Consumer:
 
 
 
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage (2)
221

 
260

Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage (2)
55

 
83

Credit card
352

 
364

Automobile
47

 
73

Other revolving credit and installment
92

 
93

Total consumer
767

 
873

Total, not government insured/guaranteed
$
841

 
920

(1)
Represents loans whose repayments are predominantly insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA.
(2)
Includes mortgage loans held for sale 90 days or more past due and still accruing.
(3)
Represents loans whose repayments are predominantly guaranteed by agencies on behalf of the U.S. Department of Education under the FFELP.


91


IMPAIRED LOANS The table below summarizes key information for impaired loans. Our impaired loans predominantly include loans on nonaccrual status in the commercial portfolio segment and loans modified in a TDR, whether on accrual or nonaccrual status. These impaired loans generally have estimated losses which are included in the allowance for credit losses. We have impaired loans with no allowance for credit losses when loss content has been previously recognized through charge-offs and we do not anticipate additional charge-offs or losses, or certain loans are currently performing in accordance with their terms
 
and for which no loss has been estimated. Impaired loans exclude PCI loans. The table below includes trial modifications that totaled$432 million at March 31, 2015, and $452 million at December 31, 2014.
For additional information on our impaired loans and allowance for credit losses, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) in our 2014 Form 10-K.
 

  
  

 
Recorded investment
 
 
  
(in millions)
Unpaid
principal
balance (1)

 
Impaired
loans

 
Impaired loans
with related
allowance for
credit losses

 
Related
allowance for
credit losses

March 31, 2015
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

Commercial:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Commercial and industrial
$
1,727

 
1,071

 
899

 
234

Real estate mortgage
3,008

 
2,349

 
2,279

 
486

Real estate construction
433

 
258

 
238

 
47

Lease financing
33

 
24

 
24

 
7

Total commercial
5,201

 
3,702

 
3,440

 
774

Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
21,007

 
18,347

 
12,119

 
2,218

Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage
2,835

 
2,529

 
1,980

 
648

Credit card
326

 
326

 
326

 
95

Automobile
188

 
123

 
48

 
7

Other revolving credit and installment
62

 
55

 
46

 
7

Total consumer (2)
24,418

 
21,380

 
14,519

 
2,975

Total impaired loans (excluding PCI)
$
29,619

 
25,082

 
17,959

 
3,749

December 31, 2014
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Commercial:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Commercial and industrial
$
1,524

 
926

 
757

 
240

Real estate mortgage
3,190

 
2,483

 
2,405

 
591

Real estate construction
491

 
331

 
308

 
45

Lease financing
33

 
19

 
19

 
8

Total commercial
5,238

 
3,759

 
3,489

 
884

Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
21,324

 
18,600

 
12,433

 
2,322

Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage
3,094

 
2,534

 
2,009

 
653

Credit card
338

 
338

 
338

 
98

Automobile
190

 
127

 
55

 
8

Other revolving credit and installment
60

 
50

 
42

 
5

Total consumer (2)
25,006

 
21,649

 
14,877

 
3,086

Total impaired loans (excluding PCI)
$
30,244

 
25,408

 
18,366

 
3,970

(1)
Excludes the unpaid principal balance for loans that have been fully charged off or otherwise have zero recorded investment.
(2)
Periods ended March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 each include the recorded investment of $2.1 billion of government insured/guaranteed loans that are predominantly insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA and generally do not have an allowance.

92

Note 5: Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (continued)

Commitments to lend additional funds on loans whose terms have been modified in a TDR amounted to $310 million and $341 million at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
 
The following tables provide the average recorded investment in impaired loans and the amount of interest income recognized on impaired loans by portfolio segment and class.

  
Quarter ended March 31,
 
  
2015
 
 
2014
 
(in millions)
Average
recorded
investment

 
Recognized
interest
income

 
Average
recorded
investment

 
Recognized
interest
income

Commercial:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Commercial and industrial
$
1,000

 
20

 
1,282

 
21

Real estate mortgage
2,421

 
43

 
3,237

 
29

Real estate construction
291

 
4

 
575

 
7

Lease financing
21

 

 
33

 

Total commercial
3,733

 
67

 
5,127

 
57

Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
18,486

 
231

 
19,479

 
237

Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage
2,522

 
35

 
2,557

 
35

Credit card
332

 
10

 
415

 
12

Automobile
126

 
4

 
179

 
7

Other revolving credit and installment
45

 
1

 
35

 
1

Total consumer
21,511

 
281

 
22,665

 
292

Total impaired loans (excluding PCI)
$
25,244

 
348

 
27,792

 
349

Interest income:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Cash basis of accounting
  
 
$
108

 
  
 
99

Other (1)
  
 
240

 
  
 
250

Total interest income
  
 
$
348

 
  
 
349

(1)
Includes interest recognized on accruing TDRs, interest recognized related to certain impaired loans which have an allowance calculated using discounting, and amortization of purchase accounting adjustments related to certain impaired loans.
 

TROUBLED DEBT RESTRUCTURINGS (TDRs)  When, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, we grant a concession for other than an insignificant period of time to a borrower that we would not otherwise consider, the related loan is classified as a TDR. We do not consider any loans modified through a loan resolution such as foreclosure or short sale to be a TDR.
We may require some consumer borrowers experiencing financial difficulty to make trial payments generally for a period of three to four months, according to the terms of a planned permanent modification, to determine if they can perform according to those terms. These arrangements represent trial modifications, which we classify and account for as TDRs. While loans are in trial payment programs, their original terms are not considered modified and they continue to advance through delinquency status and accrue interest according to their original terms. The planned modifications for these arrangements predominantly involve interest rate reductions or other interest rate concessions; however, the exact concession type and resulting financial effect are usually not finalized and do not take effect until the loan is permanently modified. The trial period terms are developed in accordance with our proprietary programs or the U.S. Treasury’s Making Home Affordable programs for real estate 1-4 family first lien (i.e. Home Affordable Modification Program – HAMP) and junior lien (i.e. Second Lien Modification Program – 2MP) mortgage loans.
 
At March 31, 2015, the loans in trial modification period were $139 million under HAMP, $36 million under 2MP and $257 million under proprietary programs, compared with $149 million, $34 million and $269 million at December 31, 2014, respectively. Trial modifications with a recorded investment of $155 million at March 31, 2015, and $167 million at December 31, 2014, were accruing loans and $277 million and $285 million, respectively, were nonaccruing loans. Our experience is that substantially all of the mortgages that enter a trial payment period program are successful in completing the program requirements and are then permanently modified at the end of the trial period. Our allowance process considers the impact of those modifications that are probable to occur.
The following table summarizes our TDR modifications for the periods presented by primary modification type and includes the financial effects of these modifications. For those loans that modify more than once, the table reflects each modification that occurred during the period. Loans that both modify and resolve within the period, as well as changes in recorded investment during the period for loans modified in prior periods, are not included in the table.



93


 
Primary modification type (1)
 
 
Financial effects of modifications
 
(in millions)
Principal (2)

 
Interest
rate
reduction

 
Other
concessions (3)

 
Total

 
Charge-
offs (4)

 
Weighted
average
interest
rate
reduction

 
Recorded
investment
related to
interest rate
reduction (5)

Quarter ended March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial and industrial
$

 
10

 
224

 
234

 
2

 
0.76
%
 
$
10

Real estate mortgage

 
21

 
309

 
330

 
1

 
1.35

 
21

Real estate construction
11

 
1

 
44

 
56

 

 
0.17

 
1

Total commercial
11

 
32

 
577

 
620

 
3

 
1.14

 
32

Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
104

 
83

 
516

 
703

 
15

 
2.46

 
165

Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage
7

 
20

 
51

 
78

 
12

 
3.18

 
27

Credit card

 
45

 

 
45

 

 
11.29

 
44

Automobile
1

 
1

 
27

 
29

 
10

 
9.06

 
1

Other revolving credit and installment

 
5

 
2

 
7

 

 
5.82

 
5

Trial modifications (6)

 

 
(2
)
 
(2
)
 

 

 

Total consumer
112

 
154

 
594

 
860

 
37

 
4.27

 
242

Total
$
123

 
186

 
1,171

 
1,480

 
40

 
3.90
%
 
$
274

Quarter ended March 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial and industrial
$

 
13

 
265

 
278

 
11

 
3.06
%
 
$
13

Real estate mortgage
3

 
39

 
294

 
336

 

 
1.29

 
39

Real estate construction

 
1

 
143

 
144

 

 
1.49

 
1

Total commercial
3

 
53

 
702

 
758

 
11

 
1.71

 
53

Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
173

 
108

 
757

 
1,038

 
32

 
2.73

 
246

Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage
18

 
34

 
63

 
115

 
18

 
3.24

 
50

Credit card

 
36

 

 
36

 

 
10.12

 
36

Automobile
1

 
1

 
23

 
25

 
10

 
9.58

 
1

Other revolving credit and installment

 
1

 
1

 
2

 

 
4.90

 
1

Trial modifications (6)

 

 
(29
)
 
(29
)
 

 

 

Total consumer
192

 
180

 
815

 
1,187

 
60

 
3.63

 
334

Total
$
195

 
233

 
1,517

 
1,945

 
71

 
3.37
%
 
$
387

(1)
Amounts represent the recorded investment in loans after recognizing the effects of the TDR, if any. TDRs may have multiple types of concessions, but are presented only once in the first modification type based on the order presented in the table above. The reported amounts include loans remodified of $522 million and $612 million, for quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.
(2)
Principal modifications include principal forgiveness at the time of the modification, contingent principal forgiveness granted over the life of the loan based on borrower performance, and principal that has been legally separated and deferred to the end of the loan, with a zero percent contractual interest rate.
(3)
Other concessions include loan renewals, term extensions and other interest and noninterest adjustments, but exclude modifications that also forgive principal and/or reduce the contractual interest rate.
(4)
Charge-offs include write-downs of the investment in the loan in the period it is contractually modified. The amount of charge-off will differ from the modification terms if the loan has been charged down prior to the modification based on our policies. In addition, there may be cases where we have a charge-off/down with no legal principal modification. Modifications resulted in legally forgiving principal (actual, contingent or deferred) of $26 million and $48 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
(5)
Reflects the effect of reduced interest rates on loans with principal or interest rate reduction primary modification type.
(6)
Trial modifications are granted a delay in payments due under the original terms during the trial payment period. However, these loans continue to advance through delinquency status and accrue interest according to their original terms. Any subsequent permanent modification generally includes interest rate related concessions; however, the exact concession type and resulting financial effect are usually not known until the loan is permanently modified. Trial modifications for the period are presented net of previously reported trial modifications that became permanent in the current period.

94

Note 5: Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (continued)

The table below summarizes permanent modification TDRs that have defaulted in the current period within 12 months of their permanent modification date. We are reporting these defaulted TDRs based on a payment default definition of 90 days past due for the commercial portfolio segment and 60 days past due for the consumer portfolio segment.
 


  
Recorded investment of defaults
 
  
Quarter ended March 31,
 
(in millions)
2015

 
2014

Commercial:
  
 
  
Commercial and industrial
$
8

 
14

Real estate mortgage
23

 
42

Real estate construction
1

 
3

Total commercial
32

 
59

Consumer:
 
 
 
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
52

 
79

Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage
4

 
7

Credit card
13

 
13

Automobile
3

 
4

Other revolving credit and installment
1

 

Total consumer
73

 
103

Total
$
105

 
162


Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans
Substantially all of our PCI loans were acquired from Wachovia on December 31, 2008, at which time we acquired commercial and consumer loans with a carrying value of $18.7 billion and $40.1 billion, respectively. The unpaid principal balance on December 31, 2008 was $98.2 billion for the total of commercial and consumer PCI loans. The following table presents PCI loans net of any remaining purchase accounting adjustments. Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage PCI loans are predominantly Pick-a-Pay loans.
(in millions)
Mar 31,
2015

 
Dec 31,
2014

Commercial:
  
 
  
Commercial and industrial
$
69

 
75

Real estate mortgage
886

 
1,261

Real estate construction
123

 
171

Total commercial
1,078

 
1,507

Consumer:
 
 
 
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
21,223

 
21,712

Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage
88

 
101

Total consumer
21,311

 
21,813

Total PCI loans (carrying value)
$
22,389

 
23,320

Total PCI loans (unpaid principal balance)
$
31,596

 
32,924




95


ACCRETABLE YIELD The excess of cash flows expected to be collected over the carrying value of PCI loans is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized in interest income using an effective yield method over the remaining life of the loan, or pools of loans. The accretable yield is affected by:
changes in interest rate indices for variable rate PCI loans – expected future cash flows are based on the variable rates in effect at the time of the regular evaluations of cash flows expected to be collected;
changes in prepayment assumptions – prepayments affect the estimated life of PCI loans which may change the amount of interest income, and possibly principal, expected to be collected; and
 
changes in the expected principal and interest payments over the estimated life – updates to expected cash flows are driven by the credit outlook and actions taken with borrowers. Changes in expected future cash flows from loan modifications are included in the regular evaluations of cash flows expected to be collected.
 
The change in the accretable yield related to PCI loans since the merger with Wachovia is presented in the following table.
 

(in millions)
  

Balance, December 31, 2008  
$
10,447

Addition of accretable yield due to acquisitions  
132

Accretion into interest income (1)
(12,783
)
Accretion into noninterest income due to sales (2)
(430
)
Reclassification from nonaccretable difference for loans with improving credit-related cash flows  
8,568

Changes in expected cash flows that do not affect nonaccretable difference (3)
11,856

Balance, December 31, 2014  
17,790

Addition of accretable yield due to acquisitions  

Accretion into interest income (1)
(398
)
Accretion into noninterest income due to sales (2)
(28
)
Reclassification from nonaccretable difference for loans with improving credit-related cash flows  
22

Changes in expected cash flows that do not affect nonaccretable difference (3)
(61
)
Balance, March 31, 2015  
$
17,325

(1)
Includes accretable yield released as a result of settlements with borrowers, which is included in interest income.
(2)
Includes accretable yield released as a result of sales to third parties, which is included in noninterest income.
(3)
Represents changes in cash flows expected to be collected due to the impact of modifications, changes in prepayment assumptions, changes in interest rates on variable rate PCI loans and sales to third parties.

96

Note 5: Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (continued)

PCI ALLOWANCE  Based on our regular evaluation of estimates of cash flows expected to be collected, we may establish an allowance for a PCI loan or pool of loans, with a charge to income
 
though the provision for losses. The following table summarizes the changes in allowance for PCI loan losses since the merger with Wachovia. 

(in millions)
Commercial

 
Pick-a-Pay

 
Other
consumer

 
Total

December 31, 2008
$

 

 

 

Provision for loan losses
1,629

 

 
104

 
1,733

Charge-offs
(1,618
)
 

 
(104
)
 
(1,722
)
Balance, December 31, 2014
11

 

 

 
11

Provision for loan losses
5

 

 

 
5

Charge-offs
(7
)
 

 

 
(7
)
Balance, March 31, 2015
$
9

 

 

 
9


COMMERCIAL PCI CREDIT QUALITY INDICATORS  The following table provides a breakdown of commercial PCI loans by risk category.
 
 

(in millions)
Commercial
and
industrial

 
Real
estate
mortgage

 
Real
estate
construction

 
Total

March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By risk category:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pass
$
13

 
407

 
84

 
504

Criticized
56

 
479

 
39

 
574

Total commercial PCI loans
$
69

 
886


123


1,078

December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By risk category:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pass
$
21

 
783

 
118

 
922

Criticized
54

 
478

 
53

 
585

Total commercial PCI loans
$
75

 
1,261

 
171

 
1,507




97


The following table provides past due information for commercial PCI loans.

(in millions)
Commercial
and
industrial

 
Real
estate
mortgage

 
Real
estate
construction

 
Total

March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By delinquency status:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current-29 DPD and still accruing
$
69

 
811

 
114

 
994

30-89 DPD and still accruing

 
9

 

 
9

90+ DPD and still accruing

 
66

 
9

 
75

Total commercial PCI loans
$
69

 
886

 
123

 
1,078

December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By delinquency status:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current-29 DPD and still accruing
$
75

 
1,135

 
161

 
1,371

30-89 DPD and still accruing

 
48

 
5

 
53

90+ DPD and still accruing

 
78

 
5

 
83

Total commercial PCI loans
$
75

 
1,261

 
171

 
1,507


CONSUMER PCI CREDIT QUALITY INDICATORS  Our consumer PCI loans were aggregated into several pools of loans at acquisition. Below, we have provided credit quality indicators based on the unpaid principal balance (adjusted for write-downs) of the individual loans included in the pool, but we have not
 
allocated the remaining purchase accounting adjustments, which were established at a pool level. The following table provides the delinquency status of consumer PCI loans.
 

  
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
(in millions)
Real estate
1-4 family
first
mortgage

 
Real estate
1-4 family
junior lien
mortgage

 
Total

 
Real estate
1-4 family
first
mortgage

 
Real estate
1-4 family
junior lien
mortgage

 
Total

By delinquency status:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Current-29 DPD and still accruing
$
19,187

 
226

 
19,413

 
19,236

 
168

 
19,404

30-59 DPD and still accruing
1,782

 
7

 
1,789

 
1,987

 
7

 
1,994

60-89 DPD and still accruing
863

 
3

 
866

 
1,051

 
3

 
1,054

90-119 DPD and still accruing
364

 
3

 
367

 
402

 
2

 
404

120-179 DPD and still accruing
378

 
2

 
380

 
440

 
3

 
443

180+ DPD and still accruing
3,596

 
18

 
3,614

 
3,654

 
83

 
3,737

Total consumer PCI loans (adjusted unpaid principal balance)
$
26,170

 
259

 
26,429

 
26,770

 
266

 
27,036

Total consumer PCI loans (carrying value)
$
21,223

 
88

 
21,311

 
21,712

 
101

 
21,813


98

Note 5: Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (continued)

The following table provides FICO scores for consumer PCI loans.
  
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
(in millions)
Real estate
1-4 family
first
mortgage

 
Real estate
1-4 family
junior lien
mortgage

 
Total

 
Real estate
1-4 family
first
mortgage

 
Real estate
1-4 family
junior lien
mortgage

 
Total

By FICO:
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
< 600
$
7,398

 
74

 
7,472

 
7,708

 
75

 
7,783

600-639
5,267

 
45

 
5,312

 
5,416

 
53

 
5,469

640-679
6,552

 
60

 
6,612

 
6,718

 
69

 
6,787

680-719
4,083

 
42

 
4,125

 
4,008

 
39

 
4,047

720-759
1,706

 
19

 
1,725

 
1,728

 
13

 
1,741

760-799
850

 
9

 
859

 
875

 
6

 
881

800+
220

 
1

 
221

 
220

 
1

 
221

No FICO available
94

 
9

 
103

 
97

 
10

 
107

Total consumer PCI loans (adjusted unpaid principal balance)
$
26,170

 
259

 
26,429

 
26,770

 
266

 
27,036

Total consumer PCI loans (carrying value)
$
21,223

 
88

 
21,311

 
21,712

 
101

 
21,813


The following table shows the distribution of consumer PCI loans by LTV for real estate 1-4 family first mortgages and by CLTV for real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgages. 

  
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
(in millions)
Real estate
1-4 family
first
mortgage
by LTV

 
Real estate
1-4 family
junior lien
mortgage
by CLTV

 
Total

 
Real estate
1-4 family
first
mortgage
by LTV

 
Real estate
1-4 family
junior lien
mortgage
by CLTV

 
Total

By LTV/CLTV:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
0-60%
$
4,541

 
28

 
4,569

 
4,309

 
34

 
4,343

60.01-80%
11,204

 
72

 
11,276

 
11,264

 
71

 
11,335

80.01-100%
7,302

 
89

 
7,391

 
7,751

 
92

 
7,843

100.01-120% (1)
2,242

 
43

 
2,285

 
2,437

 
44

 
2,481

> 120% (1)
875

 
25

 
900

 
1,000

 
24

 
1,024

No LTV/CLTV available
6

 
2

 
8

 
9

 
1

 
10

Total consumer PCI loans (adjusted unpaid principal balance)
$
26,170

 
259

 
26,429

 
26,770

 
266

 
27,036

Total consumer PCI loans (carrying value)
$
21,223

 
88

 
21,311

 
21,712

 
101

 
21,813

(1)
Reflects total loan balances with LTV/CLTV amounts in excess of 100%. In the event of default, the loss content would generally be limited to only the amount in excess of 100% LTV/CLTV.


99


Note 6:  Other Assets
The components of other assets were:
 
(in millions)
Mar 31,
2015

 
Dec 31,
2014

Nonmarketable equity investments:
  
 
  
Cost method:
  
 
  
Private equity and other
$
2,187

 
2,300

Federal bank stock
4,725

 
4,733

Total cost method
6,912

 
7,033

Equity method:
 
 
 
LIHTC investments (1)
7,464

 
7,278

Private equity and other
5,121

 
5,132

Total equity method
12,585

 
12,410

Fair value (2)
2,549

 
2,512

Total nonmarketable equity investments
22,046

 
21,955

Corporate/bank-owned life insurance
19,050

 
18,982

Accounts receivable (3)
30,600

 
27,151

Interest receivable
5,095

 
4,871

Core deposit intangibles
3,305

 
3,561

Customer relationship and other amortized intangibles
800

 
857

Foreclosed assets:
  
 
  
Residential real estate:
  
 
  
Government insured/guaranteed (3)
772

 
982

Non-government insured/guaranteed
646

 
671

Non-residential real estate
911

 
956

Operating lease assets
3,277

 
2,714

Due from customers on acceptances
222

 
201

Other (4)
15,155

 
16,156

Total other assets
$
101,879

 
99,057

(1)
Represents low income housing tax credit investments.
(2)
Represents nonmarketable equity investments for which we have elected the fair value option. See Note 13 (Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities) for additional information.
(3)
Certain government-guaranteed residential real estate mortgage loans upon foreclosure are included in Accounts receivable effective January 1, 2014. Both principal and interest related to these foreclosed real estate assets are collectible because the loans were predominantly insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA. For more information on ASU 2014-14 and the classification of certain government-guaranteed mortgage loans upon foreclosure, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in our 2014 10-K.
(4)
Includes derivatives designated as hedging instruments, derivatives not designated as hedging instruments, and derivative loan commitments, which are carried at fair value. See Note 12 (Derivatives) for additional information.

 
Income (expense) related to nonmarketable equity investments was:
 
  
Quarter ended Mar 31,
 
(in millions)
2015

 
2014

Net realized gains from nonmarketable equity investments
$
351

 
551

All other
(148
)
 
(223
)
Total
$
203

 
328


Low Income Housing Tax Credit Investments We invest in affordable housing projects that qualify for the low income housing tax credit, which is designed to promote private development of low income housing. These investments generate a return primarily through realization of federal tax credits.
Total low income housing tax credit (LIHTC) investments were $7.5 billion and $7.3 billion at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. In first quarter 2015 we recognized pre-tax losses of $178 million related to our LIHTC investments. We also recognized total tax benefits of $276 million, which included tax credits of $209 million recorded in income taxes. We are periodically required to provide additional financial support during the investment period. Our liability for these unfunded commitments was $2.7 billion at March 31, 2015, of which predominantly all is expected to be paid over the next three years. This liability is included in Long-term debt.



100


Note 7: Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities
Involvement with SPEs
In the normal course of business, we enter into various types of on- and off-balance sheet transactions with special purpose entities (SPEs), which are corporations, trusts or partnerships that are established for a limited purpose. Generally, SPEs are formed in connection with securitization transactions and are considered variable interest entities (VIEs). For further description of our involvement with SPEs, see Note 8 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K.
We have segregated our involvement with VIEs between those VIEs which we consolidate, those which we do not
 
consolidate and those for which we account for the transfers of financial assets as secured borrowings. Secured borrowings are transactions involving transfers of our financial assets to third parties that are accounted for as financings with the assets pledged as collateral. Accordingly, the transferred assets remain recognized on our balance sheet. Subsequent tables within this Note further segregate these transactions by structure type.
The following table provides the classifications of assets and liabilities in our balance sheet for our transactions with VIEs.


(in millions)
VIEs that we
do not
consolidate

 
VIEs
that we
consolidate

Transfers that
we account
for as secured
borrowings
 
 
Total

March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash
$

 
155

 
36

 
191

Trading assets
1,741

 

 
204

 
1,945

Investment securities (1)
16,624

 
749

 
3,612

 
20,985

Loans
12,415

 
4,830

 
5,032

 
22,277

Mortgage servicing rights
11,589

 

 

 
11,589

Other assets
7,607

 
314

 
42

 
7,963

Total assets
49,976

 
6,048

 
8,926

 
64,950

Short-term borrowings

 

 
2,513

 
2,513

Accrued expenses and other liabilities  
825

 
48

(2)
1

 
874

Long-term debt  
2,690

 
1,562

(2)
4,764

 
9,016

Total liabilities
3,515

 
1,610

 
7,278

 
12,403

Noncontrolling interests

 
111

 

 
111

Net assets
$
46,461

 
4,327

 
1,648

 
52,436

December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash
$

 
117

 
4

 
121

Trading assets
2,165

 

 
204

 
2,369

Investment securities (1)
18,271

 
875

 
4,592

 
23,738

Loans
13,195

 
4,509

 
5,280

 
22,984

Mortgage servicing rights
12,562

 

 

 
12,562

Other assets
7,456

 
316

 
52

 
7,824

Total assets
53,649

 
5,817

 
10,132

 
69,598

Short-term borrowings

 

 
3,141

 
3,141

Accrued expenses and other liabilities
848

 
49

(2)
1

 
898

Long-term debt
2,585

 
1,628

(2)
4,990

 
9,203

Total liabilities
3,433

 
1,677

 
8,132

 
13,242

Noncontrolling interests

 
103

 

 
103

Net assets
$
50,216

 
4,037

 
2,000

 
56,253

(1)
Excludes certain debt securities related to loans serviced for the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) and GNMA.
(2)
There were no VIE liabilities with recourse to the general credit of Wells Fargo for the periods presented.

Transactions with Unconsolidated VIEs
Our transactions with VIEs include securitizations of residential mortgage loans, CRE loans, student loans, auto loans and leases and dealer floorplan loans; investment and financing activities involving collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) backed by asset-backed and CRE securities, collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) backed by corporate loans, and other types of structured financing. We have various forms of involvement with VIEs, including servicing, holding senior or subordinated interests,
 
entering into liquidity arrangements, credit default swaps and other derivative contracts. Involvements with these unconsolidated VIEs are recorded on our balance sheet primarily in trading assets, investment securities, loans, MSRs, other assets and other liabilities, as appropriate.
The following tables provide a summary of unconsolidated VIEs with which we have significant continuing involvement, but we are not the primary beneficiary. We do not consider our continuing involvement in an unconsolidated VIE to be


101


significant when it relates to third-party sponsored VIEs for which we were not the transferor (unless we are servicer and have other significant forms of involvement) or if we were the sponsor only or sponsor and servicer but do not have any other forms of significant involvement.
Significant continuing involvement includes transactions where we were the sponsor or transferor and have other significant forms of involvement. Sponsorship includes transactions with unconsolidated VIEs where we solely or materially participated in the initial design or structuring of the entity or marketing of the transaction to investors. When we transfer assets to a VIE and account for the transfer as a sale, we are considered the transferor. We consider investments in securities (other than those held temporarily in trading), loans,
 
guarantees, liquidity agreements, written options and servicing of collateral to be other forms of involvement that may be significant. We have excluded certain transactions with unconsolidated VIEs from the balances presented in the following table where we have determined that our continuing involvement is not significant due to the temporary nature and size of our variable interests, because we were not the transferor or because we were not involved in the design of the unconsolidated VIEs. We also exclude from the table secured borrowing transactions with unconsolidated VIEs (for information on these transactions, see the Transactions with Consolidated VIEs and Secured Borrowings section in this Note).


 
 
 
Carrying value - asset (liability)
 
(in millions)
Total
VIE
assets

 
Debt and
equity
interests (1)

 
Servicing
assets

 
Derivatives

 
Other
commitments
and
guarantees

 
Net
assets

March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential mortgage loan securitizations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Conforming (2)
$
1,244,678

 
2,870

 
10,716

 

 
(562
)
 
13,024

Other/nonconforming
30,561

 
1,530

 
195

 

 
(7
)
 
1,718

Commercial mortgage securitizations
192,361

 
7,442

 
660

 
250

 
(23
)
 
8,329

Collateralized debt obligations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt securities
4,628

 
6

 

 
160

 
(102
)
 
64

Loans (3)
5,105

 
4,981

 

 

 

 
4,981

Asset-based finance structures
17,341

 
11,881

 

 
(75
)
 

 
11,806

Tax credit structures
23,688

 
8,007

 

 

 
(2,690
)
 
5,317

Collateralized loan obligations
1,672

 
488

 

 

 

 
488

Investment funds
2,149

 
49

 

 

 

 
49

Other (4)
12,300

 
696

 
18

 
(23
)
 
(6
)
 
685

Total
$
1,534,483

 
37,950

 
11,589

 
312

 
(3,390
)
 
46,461

 
 
 
Maximum exposure to loss
 
 
 
 
Debt and
equity
interests (1)

 
Servicing
assets

 
Derivatives

 
Other
commitments
and
guarantees

 
Total
exposure

Residential mortgage loan securitizations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Conforming
 
 
$
2,870

 
10,716

 

 
2,215

 
15,801

Other/nonconforming
 
 
1,530

 
195

 

 
347

 
2,072

Commercial mortgage securitizations
 
 
7,442

 
660

 
250

 
6,209

 
14,561

Collateralized debt obligations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt securities
 
 
6

 

 
160

 
102

 
268

Loans (3)
 
 
4,981

 

 

 

 
4,981

Asset-based finance structures
 
 
11,881

 

 
91

 
658

 
12,630

Tax credit structures
 
 
8,007

 

 

 
774

 
8,781

Collateralized loan obligations
 
 
488

 

 

 

 
488

Investment funds
 
 
49

 

 

 

 
49

Other (4)
 
 
696

 
18

 
122

 
157

 
993

Total
 
 
$
37,950

 
11,589

 
623

 
10,462

 
60,624


(continued on following page)

102

Note 7: Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities (continued)

(continued from previous page)
 
 
 
Carrying value - asset (liability)
 
(in millions)
Total
VIE
assets

 
Debt and
equity
interests (1)

 
Servicing
assets

 
Derivatives

 
Other
commitments
and
guarantees

 
Net
assets

December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential mortgage loan securitizations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Conforming (2)
$
1,268,200

 
2,846

 
11,684

 

 
(581
)
 
13,949

Other/nonconforming
32,213

 
1,644

 
209

 

 
(8
)
 
1,845

Commercial mortgage securitizations
196,510

 
8,756

 
650

 
251

 
(32
)
 
9,625

Collateralized debt obligations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt securities
5,039

 
11

 

 
163

 
(105
)
 
69

Loans (3)
5,347

 
5,221

 

 

 

 
5,221

Asset-based finance structures
18,954

 
13,044

 

 
(71
)
 

 
12,973

Tax credit structures
22,859

 
7,809

 

 

 
(2,585
)
 
5,224

Collateralized loan obligations
1,251

 
518

 

 

 

 
518

Investment funds
2,764

 
49

 

 

 

 
49

Other (4)
12,912

 
747

 
19

 
(18
)
 
(5
)
 
743

Total
$
1,566,049

 
40,645

 
12,562

 
325

 
(3,316
)
 
50,216

 
 
 
Maximum exposure to loss
 
 
 
 
Debt and
equity
interests (1)

 
Servicing
assets

 
Derivatives

 
Other
commitments
and
guarantees

 
Total
exposure

Residential mortgage loan securitizations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Conforming
 
 
$
2,846

 
11,684

 

 
2,507

 
17,037

Other/nonconforming
 
 
1,644

 
209

 

 
345

 
2,198

Commercial mortgage securitizations
 
 
8,756

 
650

 
251

 
5,715

 
15,372

Collateralized debt obligations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt securities
 
 
11

 

 
163

 
105

 
279

Loans (3)
 
 
5,221

 

 

 

 
5,221

Asset-based finance structures
 
 
13,044

 

 
89

 
656

 
13,789

Tax credit structures
 
 
7,809

 

 

 
725

 
8,534

Collateralized loan obligations
 
 
518

 

 

 
38

 
556

Investment funds
 
 
49

 

 

 

 
49

Other (4)
 
 
747

 
19

 
150

 
156

 
1,072

Total
 
 
$
40,645

 
12,562

 
653

 
10,247

 
64,107

(1)
Includes total equity interests of $8.2 billion and $8.1 billion at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively. Also includes debt interests in the form of both loans and securities. Excludes certain debt securities held related to loans serviced for FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA.
(2)
Excludes assets and related liabilities with a recorded carrying value on our balance sheet of $1.1 billion and $1.7 billion at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively, for certain delinquent loans that are eligible for repurchase primarily from GNMA loan securitizations. The recorded carrying value represents the amount that would be payable if the Company was to exercise the repurchase option. The carrying amounts are excluded from the table because the loans eligible for repurchase do not represent interests in the VIEs.
(3)
Represents senior loans to trusts that are collateralized by asset-backed securities. The trusts invest primarily in senior tranches from a diversified pool of primarily U.S. asset securitizations, of which all are current and 71% and 70% were rated as investment grade by the primary rating agencies at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively. These senior loans are accounted for at amortized cost and are subject to the Company’s allowance and credit charge-off policies.
(4)
Includes structured financing and credit-linked note structures. Also contains investments in auction rate securities (ARS) issued by VIEs that we do not sponsor and, accordingly, are unable to obtain the total assets of the entity.


103


In the two preceding tables, “Total VIE assets” represents the remaining principal balance of assets held by unconsolidated VIEs using the most current information available. For VIEs that obtain exposure to assets synthetically through derivative instruments, the remaining notional amount of the derivative is included in the asset balance. “Carrying value” is the amount in our consolidated balance sheet related to our involvement with the unconsolidated VIEs. “Maximum exposure to loss” from our involvement with off-balance sheet entities, which is a required disclosure under GAAP, is determined as the carrying value of our involvement with off-balance sheet (unconsolidated) VIEs plus the remaining undrawn liquidity and lending commitments, the notional amount of net written derivative contracts, and generally the notional amount of, or stressed loss estimate for, other commitments and guarantees. It represents estimated loss that would be incurred under severe, hypothetical circumstances, for which we believe the possibility is extremely remote, such as where the value of our interests and any associated collateral declines to zero, without any consideration of recovery or offset from any economic hedges. Accordingly, this required disclosure is not an indication of expected loss.
For complete descriptions of our types of transactions with unconsolidated VIEs with which we have a significant continuing involvement, but we are not the primary beneficiary, see Note 8 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K.
 
OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH VIEs  Auction rate securities (ARS) are debt instruments with long-term maturities, which re-price more frequently, and preferred equities with no maturity. At March 31, 2015, we held in our available-for-sale securities portfolio $541 million of ARS issued by VIEs compared with $567 million at December 31, 2014. We acquired the ARS pursuant to agreements entered into in 2008 and 2009.
We do not consolidate the VIEs that issued the ARS because we do not have power over the activities of the VIEs.
 
TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES  VIEs that we wholly own issue debt securities or preferred equity to third party investors. All of the proceeds of the issuance are invested in debt securities or preferred equity that we issue to the VIEs. The VIEs’ operations and cash flows relate only to the issuance, administration and repayment of the securities held by third parties. We do not consolidate these VIEs because the sole assets of the VIEs are receivables from us, even though we own all of the voting equity shares of the VIEs, have fully guaranteed the obligations of the VIEs and may have the right to redeem the third party securities under certain circumstances. In our consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, we reported the debt securities issued to the VIEs as long-term junior subordinated debt with a carrying value of $2.2 billion and $2.1 billion, respectively, and the preferred equity securities issued to the VIEs as preferred stock with a carrying value of $2.5 billion at both dates. These amounts are in addition to the involvements in these VIEs included in the preceding table.
 
Loan Sales and Securitization Activity
We periodically transfer consumer and CRE loans and other types of financial assets in securitization and whole loan sale transactions. We typically retain the servicing rights from these sales and may continue to hold other beneficial interests in the transferred financial assets. We may also provide liquidity to investors in the beneficial interests and credit enhancements in the form of standby letters of credit. Through these transfers we may be exposed to liability under limited amounts of recourse as well as standard representations and warranties we make to purchasers and issuers. The following table presents the cash flows for our transfers accounted for as sales.


104

Note 7: Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities (continued)

 
2015
 
 
2014
 
(in millions)
Mortgage
loans

 
Other
financial
assets

 
Mortgage
loans

 
Other
financial
assets

Quarter ended March 31,
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from securitizations and whole loan sales
$
41,909

 
21

 
37,614

 

Fees from servicing rights retained
935

 
2

 
1,028

 
2

Cash flows from other interests held (1)
266

 
12

 
293

 
21

Repurchases of assets/loss reimbursements (2):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-agency securitizations and whole loan transactions
6

 

 
3

 

    Agency securitizations (3)
62

 

 
76

 

Servicing advances, net of repayments
$
(100
)
 

 
(273
)
 

(1)
Cash flows from other interests held include principal and interest payments received on retained bonds and excess cash flows received on interest-only strips.
(2)
Consists of cash paid to repurchase loans from investors and cash paid to investors to reimburse them for losses on individual loans that are already liquidated. In addition, during first quarter 2014 we paid $78 million to third-party investors to settle repurchase liabilities on pools of loans. There were no first quarter 2015 loan pool settlements.
(3)
Represent loans repurchased from GNMA, FNMA, and FHLMC under representation and warranty provisions included in our loan sales contracts. First quarter 2015 and 2014 exclude $3.3 billion and $4.1 billion, respectively, in delinquent insured/guaranteed loans that we service and have exercised our option to purchase out of GNMA pools. These loans are predominantly insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA.

In first quarter 2015 and 2014, we recognized net gains of $111 million and $29 million, respectively, from transfers accounted for as sales of financial assets. These net gains primarily relate to commercial mortgage securitizations and residential mortgage securitizations where the loans were not already carried at fair value.
Sales with continuing involvement during first quarter 2015 and 2014 predominantly related to securitizations of residential mortgages that are sold to the government-sponsored entities (GSEs), including FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA (conforming residential mortgage securitizations). During first quarter 2015 and 2014, we transferred $39.5 billion and $33.6 billion respectively, in fair value of residential mortgages to unconsolidated VIEs and third-party investors and recorded the transfers as sales. Substantially all of these transfers did not result in a gain or loss because the loans were already carried at fair value. In connection with all of these transfers, in first quarter 2015 we recorded a $308 million servicing asset, measured at fair value using a Level 3 measurement technique, securities of $517 million, classified as Level 2, and a $10 million liability for repurchase losses which reflects management’s estimate of probable losses related to various representations and warranties for the loans transferred, initially measured at fair value. In first quarter 2014, we recorded a $289 million servicing asset and a $10 million liability.
 
We used the following key weighted-average assumptions to measure residential mortgage servicing rights at the date of securitization: 
 
Residential mortgage
servicing rights
 
 
2015

 
2014

Quarter ended March 31,
 
 
 
Prepayment speed (1)
13.0
%
 
12.1

Discount rate
7.5

 
7.8

Cost to service ($ per loan) (2)
$
237

 
230

(1)
The prepayment speed assumption for residential mortgage servicing rights includes a blend of prepayment speeds and default rates. Prepayment speed assumptions are influenced by mortgage interest rate inputs as well as our estimation of drivers of borrower behavior.
(2)
Includes costs to service and unreimbursed foreclosure costs, which can vary period to period depending on the mix of modified government-guaranteed loans sold to GNMA.
During first quarter 2015 and 2014, we transferred $3.2 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively, in fair value of commercial mortgages to unconsolidated VIEs and third-party investors and recorded the transfers as sales, which resulted in a gain of $77 million and $24 million for the same periods, respectively, because the loans were carried at lower of cost or market value (LOCOM). In connection with these transfers, in first quarter 2015, we recorded a servicing asset of $50 million, initially measured at fair value using a Level 3 measurement technique. In first quarter 2014, we recorded a servicing asset of $3 million, using a Level 3 measurement technique.


105


Retained Interests from Unconsolidated VIEs
The following table provides key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value of residential mortgage servicing rights and other retained interests to immediate adverse changes in those assumptions. “Other interests held” relate predominantly to residential and commercial mortgage loan securitizations. Residential mortgage-backed securities retained in securitizations issued through GSEs, such as FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA, are excluded from the table because these securities have a remote risk of credit loss due to the GSE guarantee. These
 
securities also have economic characteristics similar to GSE mortgage-backed securities that we purchase, which are not included in the table. Subordinated interests include only those bonds whose credit rating was below AAA by a major rating agency at issuance. Senior interests include only those bonds whose credit rating was AAA by a major rating agency at issuance. The information presented excludes trading positions held in inventory.
 

 
 
 
Other interests held
 
 
Residential
mortgage
servicing
rights (1)

 
Interest-only
strips

 
Consumer

 
Commercial (2)
 
($ in millions, except cost to service amounts)
 
 
Subordinated
bonds

 
Subordinated
bonds

 
Senior
bonds

Fair value of interests held at March 31, 2015
$
11,739

 
122

 
36

 
295

 
555

Expected weighted-average life (in years)
5.4

 
3.8

 
5.3

 
2.7

 
6.0

Key economic assumptions:
  
 
  
 
  

 
  
 
  
Prepayment speed assumption (3)
13.2
%
 
12.0

 
8.1

 
  
 
  
Decrease in fair value from:
  
 
  
 
  

 
  
 
  
10% adverse change
$
715

 
2

 

 
  
 
  
25% adverse change
1,695

 
6

 

 
  
 
  
Discount rate assumption
7.4
%
 
15.4

 
3.6

 
4.4

 
2.4

Decrease in fair value from:
  
 
  
 
  

 
  
 
  
100 basis point increase
$
563

 
3

 
2

 
7

 
28

200 basis point increase
1,072

 
5

 
3

 
14

 
55

Cost to service assumption ($ per loan)
174

 
  
 
  

 
  
 
  
Decrease in fair value from:
  
 
  
 
  

 
  
 
  
10% adverse change
559

 
  
 
  

 
  
 
  
25% adverse change
1,397

 
  
 
  

 
  
 
  
Credit loss assumption
  
 
  
 
0.3
%
 
3.9

 

Decrease in fair value from:
  
 
  
 
  

 
  
 
  
10% higher losses
  
 
  
 
$

 
1

 

25% higher losses
  
 
  
 

 
7

 

Fair value of interests held at December 31, 2014
$
12,738

 
117

 
36

 
294

 
546

Expected weighted-average life (in years)
5.7

 
3.9

 
5.5

 
2.9

 
6.2

Key economic assumptions:
  
 
  
 
  

 
  
 
  
Prepayment speed assumption (3)
12.5
%
 
11.4

 
7.1

 
  
 
  
Decrease in fair value from:
  
 
  
 
  

 
  
 
  
10% adverse change
$
738

 
2

 

 
  
 
  
25% adverse change
1,754

 
6

 

 
  
 
  
Discount rate assumption
7.6
%
 
18.7

 
3.9

 
4.7

 
2.8

Decrease in fair value from:
  
 
  
 
  

 
  
 
  
100 basis point increase
$
617

 
2

 
2

 
8

 
29

200 basis point increase
1,178

 
4

 
3

 
15

 
55

Cost to service assumption ($ per loan)
179

 
  
 
  

 
  
 
  
Decrease in fair value from:
  
 
  
 
  

 
  
 
  
10% adverse change
579

 
  
 
  

 
  
 
  
25% adverse change
1,433

 
  
 
  

 
  
 
  
Credit loss assumption
  
 
  
 
0.4
%
 
4.1

 

Decrease in fair value from:
  
 
  
 
  

 
  
 
  
10% higher losses
  
 
  
 
$

 
3

 

25% higher losses
  
 
  
 

 
10

 

(1)
See narrative following this table for a discussion of commercial mortgage servicing rights.
(2)
Prepayment speed assumptions do not significantly impact the value of commercial mortgage securitization bonds as the underlying commercial mortgage loans experience significantly lower prepayments due to certain contractual restrictions, impacting the borrower’s ability to prepay the mortgage.
(3)
The prepayment speed assumption for residential mortgage servicing rights includes a blend of prepayment speeds and default rates. Prepayment speed assumptions are influenced by mortgage interest rate inputs as well as our estimation of drivers of borrower behavior.

106

Note 7: Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities (continued)

In addition to residential mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) included in the previous table, we have a small portfolio of commercial MSRs with a fair value of $1.5 billion at March 31, 2015, and $1.6 billion at December 31, 2014. The nature of our commercial MSRs, which are carried at LOCOM, is different from our residential MSRs. Prepayment activity on serviced loans does not significantly impact the value of commercial MSRs because, unlike residential mortgages, commercial mortgages experience significantly lower prepayments due to certain contractual restrictions, impacting the borrower’s ability to prepay the mortgage. Additionally, for our commercial MSR portfolio, we are typically master/primary servicer, but not the special servicer, who is separately responsible for the servicing and workout of delinquent and foreclosed loans. It is the special servicer, similar to our role as servicer of residential mortgage loans, who is affected by higher servicing and foreclosure costs due to an increase in delinquent and foreclosed loans. Accordingly, prepayment speeds and costs to service are not key assumptions for commercial MSRs as they do not significantly impact the valuation. The primary economic driver impacting the fair value of our commercial MSRs is forward interest rates, which are derived from market observable yield curves used to price capital markets instruments. Market interest rates most significantly affect interest earned on custodial deposit balances. The sensitivity of the current fair value to an immediate adverse 25% change in the assumption about interest earned on deposit balances at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, results in a decrease in fair value of $162 million and $185 million, respectively. See Note 8 (Mortgage Banking Activities) for further information on our commercial MSRs.
We also have a loan to an unconsolidated third party VIE that we extended in fourth quarter 2014 in conjunction with our sale of government guaranteed student loans. The loan is carried at amortized cost and approximates fair value at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014. The carrying amount of the loan at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, was $6.1 billion and $6.5 billion, respectively. The estimated fair value of the loan is considered a Level 3 measurement that is determined using
 
discounted cash flows that are based on changes in the discount rate due to changes in the risk premium component (credit spreads). The primary economic assumption impacting the fair value of our loan is the discount rate. Changes in the credit loss assumption are not expected to affect the estimated fair value of the loan due to the government guarantee of the underlying collateral. The sensitivity of the current fair value to an immediate adverse increase of 200 basis points in the risk premium component of the discount rate assumption is a decrease in fair value of $101 million and $130 million at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively.
The sensitivities in the preceding paragraphs and table are hypothetical and caution should be exercised when relying on this data. Changes in value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the assumption to the change in value may not be linear. Also, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the value of the other interests held is calculated independently without changing any other assumptions. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in others (for example, changes in prepayment speed estimates could result in changes in the credit losses), which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

Off-Balance Sheet Loans
The following table presents information about the principal balances of off-balance sheet loans that were sold or securitized, including residential mortgage loans sold to FNMA, FHLMC, GNMA and other investors, for which we have some form of continuing involvement (primarily servicer). Delinquent loans include loans 90 days or more past due and loans in bankruptcy, regardless of delinquency status. For loans sold or securitized where servicing is our only form of continuing involvement, we would only experience a loss if we were required to repurchase a delinquent loan or foreclosed asset due to a breach in representations and warranties associated with our loan sale or servicing contracts.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net charge-offs
 
 
Total loans
 
 
Delinquent loans and foreclosed assets (1)
 
 
Quarter ended
 
 
Mar 31,

 
Dec 31,

 
Mar 31,

 
Dec 31,

 
Mar 31,
 
(in millions)
2015

 
2014

 
2015

 
2014

 
2015

 
2014

Commercial:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate mortgage
$
110,560

 
114,081

 
8,051

 
7,949

 
52

 
634

Total commercial
110,560

 
114,081

 
8,051

 
7,949

 
52

 
634

Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
1,296,484

 
1,322,136

 
26,477

 
28,639

 
205

 
144

Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage

 
1

 

 

 

 

Other revolving credit and installment
1,553

 
1,599

 
70

 
75

 

 

Total consumer
1,298,037

 
1,323,736

 
26,547

 
28,714

 
205

 
144

Total off-balance sheet sold or securitized loans (2)
$
1,408,597

 
1,437,817

 
34,598

 
36,663

 
257

 
778

(1)
Includes $5.2 billion and $3.3 billion of commercial foreclosed assets and $2.6 billion and $2.7 billion of consumer foreclosed assets at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively.
(2)
At March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, the table includes total loans of $1.3 trillion at both dates and delinquent loans of $15.9 billion and $16.5 billion, respectively for FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA. Net charge-offs exclude loans sold to FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA as we do not service or manage the underlying real estate upon foreclosure and, as such, do not have access to net charge-off information.

107


Transactions with Consolidated VIEs and Secured Borrowings
The following table presents a summary of financial assets and liabilities for asset transfers accounted for as secured borrowings and involvements with consolidated VIEs. “Assets” are presented using GAAP measurement methods, which may include fair value, credit impairment or other adjustments, and therefore in
 
some instances will differ from “Total VIE assets.” For VIEs that obtain exposure synthetically through derivative instruments, the remaining notional amount of the derivative is included in “Total VIE assets.” On the consolidated balance sheet, we separately disclose the consolidated assets of certain VIEs that can only be used to settle the liabilities of those VIEs.

 
 
 
Carrying value
 
(in millions)
Total VIE
assets

 
Assets

 
Liabilities

 
Noncontrolling
interests

 
Net assets

March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Secured borrowings:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Municipal tender option bond securitizations
$
4,355

 
3,858

 
(2,514
)
 

 
1,344

Commercial real estate loans
181

 
181

 

 

 
181

Residential mortgage securitizations
4,651

 
4,887

 
(4,764
)
 

 
123

Total secured borrowings
9,187

 
8,926

 
(7,278
)
 

 
1,648

Consolidated VIEs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nonconforming residential mortgage loan securitizations
4,841

 
4,296

 
(1,452
)
 

 
2,844

Commercial real estate loans
529

 
529

 

 

 
529

Structured asset finance
46

 
46

 
(24
)
 

 
22

Investment funds
810

 
809

 
(1
)
 

 
808

Other
423

 
368

 
(133
)
 
(111
)
 
124

Total consolidated VIEs
6,649

 
6,048

 
(1,610
)
 
(111
)
 
4,327

Total secured borrowings and consolidated VIEs
$
15,836

 
14,974

 
(8,888
)
 
(111
)
 
5,975

December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Secured borrowings:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Municipal tender option bond securitizations
$
5,422

 
4,837

 
(3,143
)
 

 
1,694

Commercial real estate loans
250

 
250

 
(63
)
 

 
187

Residential mortgage securitizations
4,804

 
5,045

 
(4,926
)
 

 
119

Total secured borrowings
10,476

 
10,132

 
(8,132
)
 

 
2,000

Consolidated VIEs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nonconforming residential mortgage loan securitizations
5,041

 
4,491

 
(1,509
)
 

 
2,982

Structured asset finance
47

 
47

 
(23
)
 

 
24

Investment funds
904

 
904

 
(2
)
 

 
902

Other
431

 
375

 
(143
)
 
(103
)
 
129

Total consolidated VIEs
6,423

 
5,817

 
(1,677
)
 
(103
)
 
4,037

Total secured borrowings and consolidated VIEs
$
16,899

 
15,949

 
(9,809
)
 
(103
)
 
6,037


In addition to the structure types included in the previous table, at both March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, we had approximately $6.0 billion of private placement debt financing issued through a consolidated VIE. The issuance is classified as long-term debt in our consolidated financial statements. At March 31, 2015, we pledged approximately $613 million in loans (principal and interest eligible to be capitalized) and $5.8 billion in available-for-sale securities to collateralize the VIE’s borrowings, compared with $637 million and $5.7 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2014. These assets were not transferred to the VIE, and accordingly we have excluded the VIE from the previous table.
For complete descriptions of our accounting for transfers accounted for as secured borrowings and involvements with consolidated VIEs see Note 8 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K.


108


Note 8:  Mortgage Banking Activities

Mortgage banking activities, included in the Community Banking and Wholesale Banking operating segments, consist of residential and commercial mortgage originations, sale activity and servicing.
We apply the amortization method to commercial MSRs and apply the fair value method to residential MSRs. The changes in MSRs measured using the fair value method were:
 
 

  
Quarter ended March 31,
 
(in millions)
2015

 
2014

Fair value, beginning of period
$
12,738

 
15,580

Servicing from securitizations or asset transfers
308

 
289

Sales
(1
)
 

Net additions
307

 
289

Changes in fair value:
  
 
  
Due to changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions:
  
 
  
Mortgage interest rates (1)
(572
)
 
(509
)
Servicing and foreclosure costs (2)
(18
)
 
(34
)
Prepayment estimates and other (3)
(183
)
 
102

Net changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions
(773
)
 
(441
)
Other changes in fair value (4)
(533
)
 
(475
)
Total changes in fair value
(1,306
)
 
(916
)
Fair value, end of period
$
11,739

 
14,953

(1)
Includes prepayment speed changes as well as other valuation changes due to changes in mortgage interest rates (such as changes in estimated interest earned on custodial deposit balances).
(2)
Includes costs to service and unreimbursed foreclosure costs.
(3)
Represents changes driven by other valuation model inputs or assumptions including prepayment speed estimation changes and other assumption updates. Prepayment speed estimation changes are influenced by observed changes in borrower behavior and other external factors that occur independent of interest rate changes.
(4)
Represents changes due to collection/realization of expected cash flows over time.
 
The changes in amortized MSRs were:
 
 

  
Quarter ended March 31,
 
(in millions)
2015

 
2014

Balance, beginning of period
$
1,242

 
1,229

Purchases
22

 
40

Servicing from securitizations or asset transfers
50

 
14

Amortization
(62
)
 
(64
)
Balance, end of period (1)
$
1,252

 
1,219

Fair value of amortized MSRs:
  
 
  
Beginning of period
$
1,637

 
1,575

End of period
1,522

 
1,624

(1)
Commercial amortized MSRs are evaluated for impairment purposes by the following risk strata: agency (GSEs) and non-agency. There was no valuation allowance recorded for the periods presented on the commercial amortized MSRs.




109


We present the components of our managed servicing portfolio in the following table at unpaid principal balance for loans serviced and subserviced for others and at book value for owned loans serviced.
 
 

(in billions)
Mar 31, 2015

 
Dec 31, 2014

Residential mortgage servicing:
  

 
  

Serviced for others
$
1,374

 
1,405

Owned loans serviced
344

 
342

Subserviced for others
5

 
5

Total residential servicing
1,723

 
1,752

Commercial mortgage servicing:
  
 
  
Serviced for others
461

 
456

Owned loans serviced
112

 
112

Subserviced for others
7

 
7

Total commercial servicing
580

 
575

Total managed servicing portfolio
$
2,303

 
2,327

Total serviced for others
$
1,835

 
1,861

Ratio of MSRs to related loans serviced for others
0.71
%
 
0.75
%
 
The components of mortgage banking noninterest income were:
 
 

  
Quarter ended March 31,
 
(in millions)
2015

 
2014

Servicing income, net:
  
 
  
Servicing fees:
  
 
  
Contractually specified servicing fees
$
1,020

 
1,082

Late charges
53

 
56

Ancillary fees
71

 
80

Unreimbursed direct servicing costs (1)
(134
)
 
(148
)
Net servicing fees
1,010

 
1,070

Changes in fair value of MSRs carried at fair value:
  
 
  
Due to changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions (2)
(773
)
 
(441
)
Other changes in fair value (3)
(533
)
 
(475
)
Total changes in fair value of MSRs carried at fair value
(1,306
)
 
(916
)
Amortization
(62
)
 
(64
)
Net derivative gains (losses) from economic hedges (4)
881

 
848

Total servicing income, net
523

 
938

Net gains on mortgage loan origination/sales activities
1,024

 
572

Total mortgage banking noninterest income
$
1,547

 
1,510

Market-related valuation changes to MSRs, net of hedge results (2) + (4)
$
108

 
407

(1)
Primarily associated with foreclosure expenses and unreimbursed interest advances to investors.
(2)
Refer to the changes in fair value of MSRs table in this Note for more detail.
(3)
Represents changes due to collection/realization of expected cash flows over time.
(4)
Represents results from economic hedges used to hedge the risk of changes in fair value of MSRs. See Note 12 (Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments) for additional discussion and detail.


110

Note 8: Mortgage Banking Activities (continued)

The table below summarizes the changes in our liability for mortgage loan repurchase losses. This liability is in “Accrued expenses and other liabilities” in our consolidated balance sheet and the provision for repurchase losses reduces net gains on mortgage loan origination/sales activities in “Mortgage banking” in our consolidated income statement.
Because of the uncertainty in the various estimates underlying the mortgage repurchase liability, there is a range of losses in excess of the recorded mortgage repurchase liability that is reasonably possible. The estimate of the range of possible loss for representations and warranties does not represent a probable loss, and is based on currently available information, significant judgment, and a number of assumptions that are subject to change. The high end of this range of reasonably possible losses in excess of our recorded liability was $936 million at March 31, 2015, and was determined based upon modifying the assumptions (particularly to assume significant changes in investor repurchase demand practices) utilized in our best estimate of probable loss to reflect what we believe to be the high end of reasonably possible adverse assumptions.
 
  
Quarter ended March 31,
 
(in millions)
2015

 
2014

Balance, beginning of period
$
615

 
899

Provision for repurchase losses:
  

 
  

Loan sales
10

 
10

Change in estimate (1)
(26
)
 
(4
)
Total additions (reductions)
(16
)
 
6

Losses
(13
)
 
(106
)
Balance, end of period
$
586

 
799

(1)
Results from changes in investor demand, mortgage insurer practices, credit and the financial stability of correspondent lenders.




111


Note 9:  Intangible Assets
The gross carrying value of intangible assets and accumulated amortization was:

  
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
(in millions)
Gross
carrying
value

 
Accumulated
amortization

 
Net
carrying
value

 
Gross
carrying
value

 
Accumulated
amortization

 
Net
carrying
value

Amortized intangible assets (1):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MSRs (2)
$
2,975

 
(1,723
)
 
1,252

 
2,906

 
(1,664
)
 
1,242

Core deposit intangibles
12,834

 
(9,529
)
 
3,305

 
12,834

 
(9,273
)
 
3,561

Customer relationship and other intangibles
3,179

 
(2,379
)
 
800

 
3,179

 
(2,322
)
 
857

Total amortized intangible assets
$
18,988

 
(13,631
)
 
5,357

 
18,919

 
(13,259
)
 
5,660

Unamortized intangible assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MSRs (carried at fair value) (2)
$
11,739

 
 
 
 
 
12,738

 
 
 
 
Goodwill
25,705

 
 
 
 
 
25,705

 
 
 
 
Trademark
14

 
 
 
 
 
14

 
 
 
 
(1)
Excludes fully amortized intangible assets.
(2)
See Note 8 (Mortgage Banking Activities) for additional information on MSRs.

The following table provides the current year and estimated future amortization expense for amortized intangible assets. We based our projections of amortization expense shown below on existing asset balances at March 31, 2015. Future amortization expense may vary from these projections.
 





(in millions)
Amortized MSRs

 
Core deposit
intangibles

 
Customer
relationship and
other
intangibles

 
Total

Three months ended March 31, 2015 (actual)
$
62

 
256

 
57

 
375

Estimate for the remainder of 2015
$
189

 
766

 
169

 
1,124

Estimate for year ended December 31,
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
2016
213

 
919

 
211

 
1,343

2017
167

 
851

 
197

 
1,215

2018
137

 
769

 
188

 
1,094

2019
121

 

 
12

 
133

2020
107

 

 
8

 
115


For our goodwill impairment analysis, we allocate all of the goodwill to the individual operating segments. We identify reporting units that are one level below an operating segment (referred to as a component), and distinguish these reporting units based on how the segments and components are managed, taking into consideration the economic characteristics, nature of the products and customers of the components. At the time we acquire a business, we allocate goodwill to applicable reporting units based on their relative fair value, and if we have a
 
significant business reorganization, we may reallocate the goodwill. See Note 18 (Operating Segments) for further information on management reporting.
The following table shows the allocation of goodwill to our reportable operating segments for purposes of goodwill impairment testing.
 

(in millions)
Community
Banking

 
Wholesale
Banking

 
Wealth,
Brokerage and
Retirement

 
Consolidated
Company

December 31, 2013 and March 31, 2014
$
17,922

 
7,344

 
371

 
25,637

December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2015
$
17,914

 
7,420

 
371

 
25,705





112


Note 10:  Guarantees, Pledged Assets and Collateral
Guarantees are contracts that contingently require us to make payments to a guaranteed party based on an event or a change in an underlying asset, liability, rate or index. Guarantees are generally in the form of standby letters of credit, securities lending and other indemnifications, written put options, recourse obligations, and other types of arrangements. For complete
 
descriptions of our guarantees, see Note 14 (Guarantees, Pledged Assets and Collateral) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K. The following table shows carrying value, maximum exposure to loss on our guarantees and the related non-investment grade amounts.
 

  
March 31, 2015
 
  
  

 
Maximum exposure to loss
 
(in millions)
Carrying
value

 
Expires in
one year
or less

 
Expires after
one year
through
three years

 
Expires after
three years
through
five years

 
Expires
after five
years

 
Total

 
Non-
investment
grade

Standby letters of credit (1)
$
57

 
16,267

 
10,695

 
5,644

 
640

 
33,246

 
8,433

Securities lending and other indemnifications (2)

 

 

 

 
6,153

 
6,153

 

Written put options (3)
611

 
8,421

 
5,642

 
3,081

 
2,308

 
19,452

 
8,399

Loans and MHFS sold with recourse (4)
63

 
115

 
641

 
702

 
5,716

 
7,174

 
4,367

Factoring guarantees (5)

 
2,043

 

 

 

 
2,043

 
2,043

Other guarantees
24

 
42

 
52

 
22

 
2,197

 
2,313

 
69

Total guarantees
$
755

 
26,888

 
17,030

 
9,449

 
17,014

 
70,381

 
23,311

  
December 31, 2014
 
  
  

 
Maximum exposure to loss
 
(in millions)
Carrying
value

 
Expires in
one year
or less

 
Expires after
one year
through
three years

 
Expires after
three years
through
five years

 
Expires
after five
years

 
Total

 
Non-
investment
grade

Standby letters of credit (1)
$
41

 
16,271

 
10,269

 
6,295

 
645

 
33,480

 
8,447

Securities lending and other indemnifications (2)

 

 
2

 
2

 
5,948

 
5,952

 

Written put options (3)
469

 
7,644

 
5,256

 
2,822

 
2,409

 
18,131

 
7,902

Loans and MHFS sold with recourse (4)
72

 
131

 
486

 
822

 
5,386

 
6,825

 
3,945

Factoring guarantees (5)

 
3,460

 

 

 

 
3,460

 
3,460

Other guarantees
24

 
9

 
85

 
22

 
2,158

 
2,274

 
69

Total guarantees
$
606

 
27,515

 
16,098

 
9,963

 
16,546

 
70,122

 
23,823

(1)
Total maximum exposure to loss includes direct pay letters of credit (DPLCs) of $14.4 billion and $15.0 billion at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. We issue DPLCs to provide credit enhancements for certain bond issuances. Beneficiaries (bond trustees) may draw upon these instruments to make scheduled principal and interest payments, redeem all outstanding bonds because a default event has occurred, or for other reasons as permitted by the agreement. We also originate multipurpose lending commitments under which borrowers have the option to draw on the facility in one of several forms, including as a standby letter of credit. Total maximum exposure to loss includes the portion of these facilities for which we have issued standby letters of credit under the commitments.
(2)
Includes $33 million and $211 million at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, in debt and equity securities lent from participating institutional client portfolios to third-party borrowers. Also includes indemnifications provided to certain third-party clearing agents. Outstanding customer obligations under these arrangements were $1.1 billion and $950 million with related collateral of $5.4 billion and $5.6 billion at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Estimated maximum exposure to loss was $6.1 billion and $5.7 billion as of the same periods, respectively.
(3)
Written put options, which are in the form of derivatives, are also included in the derivative disclosures in Note 12 (Derivatives).
(4)
Represent recourse provided, predominantly to the GSEs, on loans sold under various programs and arrangements. Under these arrangements, we repurchased $1 million of loans associated with these agreements in both first quarter 2015 and 2014.
(5)
Consists of guarantees made under certain factoring arrangements to purchase trade receivables from third parties, generally upon their request, if receivable debtors default on their payment obligations.

“Maximum exposure to loss” and “Non-investment grade” are required disclosures under GAAP. Non-investment grade represents those guarantees on which we have a higher risk of being required to perform under the terms of the guarantee. If the underlying assets under the guarantee are non-investment grade (that is, an external rating that is below investment grade or an internal credit default grade that is equivalent to a below investment grade external rating), we consider the risk of performance to be high. Internal credit default grades are determined based upon the same credit policies that we use to evaluate the risk of payment or performance when making loans and other extensions of credit. These credit policies are further described in Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses).
 
Maximum exposure to loss represents the estimated loss that would be incurred under an assumed hypothetical circumstance, despite what we believe is its extremely remote possibility, where the value of our interests and any associated collateral declines to zero. Maximum exposure to loss estimates in the table above do not reflect economic hedges or collateral we could use to offset or recover losses we may incur under our guarantee agreements. Accordingly, this required disclosure is not an indication of expected loss. We believe the carrying value, which is either fair value for derivative-related products or the allowance for lending-related commitments, is more representative of our exposure to loss than maximum exposure to loss.



113


Pledged Assets
As part of our liquidity management strategy, we pledge assets to secure trust and public deposits, borrowings and letters of credit from the FHLB and FRB, securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase agreements), and for other purposes as required or permitted by law or insurance statutory requirements. The types of collateral we pledge include securities issued by federal agencies, GSEs, domestic and foreign companies and various commercial and consumer loans. The following table provides the total carrying amount of pledged assets by asset type. The table excludes pledged consolidated VIE
 
assets of $6.0 billion and $5.8 billion at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively, which can only be used to settle the liabilities of those entities. The table also excludes $8.9 billion and $10.1 billion in assets pledged in transactions accounted for as secured borrowings at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. See Note 7 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) for additional information on consolidated VIE assets and secured borrowings.
 

(in millions)
Mar. 31,
2015

 
Dec. 31,
2014

Trading assets and other (1)
$
69,685

 
49,685

Investment securities (2)
94,333

 
101,997

Mortgages held for sale and Loans (3)
426,953

 
418,338

Total pledged assets
$
590,971

 
570,020

(1)
Represent assets pledged to collateralize repurchase agreements and other securities financings. Balance includes $69.2 billion and $49.4 billion at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively, under agreements that permit the secured parties to sell or repledge the collateral.
(2)
Includes carrying value of $5.8 billion and $6.6 billion (fair value of $5.8 billion and $6.8 billion) in collateral for repurchase agreements at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively, which are pledged under agreements that do not permit the secured parties to sell or repledge the collateral. Also includes $2.7 billion and $164 million in collateral pledged under repurchase agreements at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively, that permit the secured parties to sell or repledge the collateral.
(3)
Includes mortgages held for sale of $11.1 billion and $8.7 billion at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Balance consists of mortgages held for sale and loans that are pledged under agreements that do not permit the secured parties to sell or repledge the collateral. Amounts exclude $1.1 billion and $1.7 billion at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, of pledged loans recorded on our balance sheet representing certain delinquent loans that are eligible for repurchase primarily from GNMA loan securitizations. See Note 7 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) for additional information.


114

Note 10: Guarantees, Pledge Assets and Collateral (continued)

Offsetting of Resale and Repurchase Agreements and Securities Borrowing and Lending Agreements
The table below presents resale and repurchase agreements subject to master repurchase agreements (MRA) and securities borrowing and lending agreements subject to master securities lending agreements (MSLA). We account for transactions subject to these agreements as collateralized financings, and those with a single counterparty are presented net on our balance sheet, provided certain criteria are met that permit balance sheet netting. Most transactions subject to these agreements do not meet those criteria and thus are not eligible for balance sheet netting.
Collateral we pledged consists of non-cash instruments, such as securities or loans, and is not netted on the balance sheet against the related collateralized liability. Collateral we received
 
includes securities or loans and is not recognized on our balance sheet. Collateral received or pledged may be increased or decreased over time to maintain certain contractual thresholds as the assets underlying each arrangement fluctuate in value. Generally, these agreements require collateral to exceed the asset or liability recognized on the balance sheet. The following table includes the amount of collateral pledged or received related to exposures subject to enforceable MRAs or MSLAs. While these agreements are typically over-collateralized, U.S. GAAP requires disclosure in this table to limit the amount of such collateral to the amount of the related recognized asset or liability for each counterparty.
In addition to the amounts included in the table below, we also have balance sheet netting related to derivatives that is disclosed within Note 12 (Derivatives).
 

(in millions)
Mar 31,
2015

 
Dec 31,
2014

Assets:
  
 
  
Resale and securities borrowing agreements
  
 
  
Gross amounts recognized
$
69,122

 
58,148

Gross amounts offset in consolidated balance sheet (1)
(14,247
)
 
(6,477
)
Net amounts in consolidated balance sheet (2)
54,875

 
51,671

Collateral not recognized in consolidated balance sheet (3)
(54,592
)
 
(51,624
)
Net amount (4)
$
283

 
47

Liabilities:
  
 
  
Repurchase and securities lending agreements
  
 
  
Gross amounts recognized
$
77,643

 
56,583

Gross amounts offset in consolidated balance sheet (1)
(14,247
)
 
(6,477
)
Net amounts in consolidated balance sheet (5)
63,396

 
50,106

Collateral pledged but not netted in consolidated balance sheet (6)
(62,540
)
 
(49,713
)
Net amount (7)
$
856

 
393

(1)
Represents recognized amount of resale and repurchase agreements with counterparties subject to enforceable MRAs or MSLAs that have been offset in the consolidated balance sheet.
(2)
At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, includes $40.1 billion and $36.8 billion, respectively, classified on our consolidated balance sheet in Federal funds sold, securities purchased under resale agreements and other short-term investments and $14.8 billion and $14.9 billion, respectively, in Loans.
(3)
Represents the fair value of collateral we have received under enforceable MRAs or MSLAs, limited for table presentation purposes to the amount of the recognized asset due from each counterparty. At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we have received total collateral with a fair value of $76.4 billion and $64.5 billion, respectively, all of which, we have the right to sell or repledge. These amounts include securities we have sold or repledged to others with a fair value of $52.7 billion at March 31, 2015 and $40.8 billion at December 31, 2014.
(4)
Represents the amount of our exposure that is not collateralized and/or is not subject to an enforceable MRA or MSLA.
(5)
Amount is classified in Short-term borrowings on our consolidated balance sheet.
(6)
Represents the fair value of collateral we have pledged, related to enforceable MRAs or MSLAs, limited for table presentation purposes to the amount of the recognized liability owed to each counterparty. At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we have pledged total collateral with a fair value of $78.2 billion and $56.5 billion, respectively, of which, the counterparty does not have the right to sell or repledge $6.3 billion as of March 31, 2015 and $6.9 billion as of December 31, 2014.
(7)
Represents the amount of our obligation that is not covered by pledged collateral and/or is not subject to an enforceable MRA or MSLA.


115


Note 11:  Legal Actions
The following supplements our discussion of certain matters previously reported in Note 15 (Legal Actions) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K for events occurring during first quarter 2015.

ORDER OF POSTING LITIGATION  A series of putative class actions have been filed against Wachovia Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as well as many other banks, challenging the high to low order in which the banks post debit card transactions to consumer deposit accounts. There are currently several such cases pending against Wells Fargo Bank (including the Wachovia Bank cases to which Wells Fargo succeeded), most of which have been consolidated in multi-district litigation proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The bank defendants moved to compel these cases to arbitration under Supreme Court authority. On November 22, 2011, the Judge denied the motion. The bank defendants appealed the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. On October 26, 2012, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the District Court’s denial of the motion. Wells Fargo renewed its motion to compel arbitration with respect to the unnamed putative class members. On April 8, 2013, the District Court denied the motion and Wells Fargo appealed the decision to the Eleventh Circuit. On February 10, 2015, the Eleventh Circuit vacated the order based on the District Court's lack of jurisdiction until class certification has been determined, and remanded to the District Court for further proceedings.
On August 10, 2010, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued an order in Gutierrez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a case that was not consolidated in the multi-district proceedings, enjoining the bank’s use of the high to low posting method for debit card transactions with respect to the plaintiff class of California depositors, directing the bank to establish a different posting methodology and ordering remediation of approximately $203 million. On October 26, 2010, a final judgment was entered in Gutierrez. On October 28, 2010, Wells Fargo appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On December 26, 2012, the Ninth Circuit reversed the order requiring Wells Fargo to change its order of posting and vacated the portion of the order granting remediation of approximately $203 million on the grounds of federal preemption. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the District Court’s finding that Wells Fargo violated a California state law prohibition on fraudulent representations and remanded the case to the District Court for further proceedings. On August 5, 2013, the District Court entered a judgment against Wells Fargo in the approximate amount of $203 million, together with post-judgment interest thereon from October 25, 2010, and, effective as of July 15, 2013, enjoined Wells Fargo from making or disseminating additional misrepresentations about its order of posting of transactions. On August 7, 2013, Wells Fargo appealed the judgment to the Ninth Circuit. On October 29, 2014, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the trial court’s judgment against Wells Fargo for approximately $203 million, but limited the injunction to debit card transactions. Wells Fargo filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court on April 10, 2015.

 
SECURITIES LENDING LITIGATION  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. was involved in four separate actions brought by securities lending customers of Wells Fargo and Wachovia Bank in various courts. In general, each of the cases alleges losses based on claims that Wells Fargo violated fiduciary and contractual duties in its investment of collateral for loaned securities. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Minnesota, et al., v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. resulted in verdicts dismissing the claims against Wells Fargo. Plaintiffs have appealed the verdicts. Wells Fargo has resolved one of the other cases and the remaining cases are expected to go to trial in 2015.

OUTLOOK  When establishing a liability for contingent litigation losses, the Company determines a range of potential losses for each matter that is both probable and estimable, and records the amount it considers to be the best estimate within the range. The high end of the range of reasonably possible potential litigation losses in excess of the Company’s liability for probable and estimable losses was approximately $1.2 billion as of March 31, 2015. For these matters and others where an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible but not probable, there may be a range of possible losses in excess of the established liability that cannot be estimated. Based on information currently available, advice of counsel, available insurance coverage and established reserves, Wells Fargo believes that the eventual outcome of the actions against Wells Fargo and/or its subsidiaries, including the matters described above, will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on Wells Fargo’s consolidated financial position. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of those matters, if unfavorable, may be material to Wells Fargo’s results of operations for any particular period.


116


Note 12:  Derivatives
We primarily use derivatives to manage exposure to market risk, including interest rate risk, credit risk and foreign currency risk, and to assist customers with their risk management objectives. We designate certain derivatives as hedging instruments in a qualifying hedge accounting relationship (fair value or cash flow hedge). Our remaining derivatives consist of economic hedges that do not qualify for hedge accounting and derivatives held for customer accommodation, trading, or other purposes. For more information on our derivative activities, see Note 16 (Derivatives) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K.
The following table presents the total notional or contractual amounts and fair values for our derivatives. Derivative
 
transactions can be measured in terms of the notional amount, but this amount is not recorded on the balance sheet and is not, when viewed in isolation, a meaningful measure of the risk profile of the instruments. The notional amount is generally not exchanged but is used only as the basis on which interest and other payments are determined. Derivatives designated as qualifying hedging instruments and economic hedges are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value in other assets or other liabilities. Customer accommodation, trading and other derivatives are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value in trading assets, other assets or other liabilities.

 
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
 
Notional or
contractual
amount

 
 
 
Fair value

 
Notional or
contractual
amount

 
 
 
Fair value

(in millions)
 
Asset
derivatives

 
Liability
derivatives

 
 
Asset
derivatives

 
Liability
derivatives

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts (1)
$
161,185

 
8,349

 
2,956

 
148,967

 
6,536

 
2,435

Foreign exchange contracts (1)
26,369

 
688

 
2,739

 
26,778

 
752

 
1,347

Total derivatives designated as qualifying hedging instruments
 
 
9,037

 
5,695

 
 
 
7,288

 
3,782

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Economic hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts (2)
238,419

 
775

 
643

 
221,527

 
697

 
487

Equity contracts
5,959

 
432

 
50

 
5,219

 
367

 
96

Foreign exchange contracts
16,722

 
462

 
58

 
14,405

 
275

 
28

Subtotal
 
 
1,669

 
751

 
 
 
1,339

 
611

Customer accommodation, trading and other derivatives:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
4,886,284

 
74,070

 
74,584

 
4,378,767

 
56,465

 
57,137

Commodity contracts
76,664

 
6,879

 
7,523

 
88,640

 
7,461

 
7,702

Equity contracts
139,526

 
8,698

 
6,733

 
138,422

 
8,638

 
6,942

Foreign exchange contracts
256,071

 
8,601

 
8,819

 
253,742

 
6,377

 
6,452

Credit contracts - protection sold
13,207

 
172

 
851

 
12,304

 
151

 
943

Credit contracts - protection purchased
17,936

 
710

 
194

 
16,659

 
755

 
168

Other contracts
1,954

 

 
52

 
1,994

 

 
44

Subtotal
 
 
99,130

 
98,756

 
 
 
79,847

 
79,388

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
 
 
100,799

 
99,507

 
 
 
81,186

 
79,999

Total derivatives before netting
 
 
109,836

 
105,202

 
 
 
88,474

 
83,781

Netting (3)
 
 
(88,129
)
 
(86,777
)
 
 
 
(65,869
)
 
(65,043
)
Total
 
 
$
21,707

 
18,425

 
 
 
22,605

 
18,738

(1)
Notional amounts presented exclude $1.9 billion of interest rate contracts at both March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, for certain derivatives that are combined for designation as a hedge on a single instrument. The notional amount for foreign exchange contracts at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014 excludes $2.4 billion and $2.7 billion, respectively, for certain derivatives that are combined for designation as a hedge on a single instrument.
(2)
Includes economic hedge derivatives used to hedge the risk of changes in the fair value of residential MSRs, MHFS, loans, derivative loan commitments and other interests held.
(3)
Represents balance sheet netting of derivative asset and liability balances, related cash collateral and portfolio level counterparty valuation adjustments. See the next table in this Note for further information.


117


The following table provides information on the gross fair values of derivative assets and liabilities, the balance sheet netting adjustments and the resulting net fair value amount recorded on our balance sheet, as well as the non-cash collateral associated with such arrangements. We execute the majority of our derivative transactions under master netting arrangements. We reflect all derivative balances and related cash collateral subject to enforceable master netting arrangements on a net basis within the balance sheet. The “Gross amounts recognized” column in the following table includes $90.0 billion and $95.9 billion of gross derivative assets and liabilities, respectively, at March 31, 2015, and $69.6 billion and $75.0 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2014, with counterparties subject to enforceable master netting arrangements that are carried on the balance sheet net of offsetting amounts. The remaining gross derivative assets and liabilities of $19.8 billion and $9.3 billion, respectively, at March 31, 2015 and $18.9 billion and $8.8 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2014, include those with counterparties subject to master netting arrangements for which we have not assessed the enforceability because they are with counterparties where we do not currently have positions to offset, those subject to master netting arrangements where we have not been able to confirm the enforceability and those not subject to master netting arrangements. As such,we do not net derivative balances or collateral within the balance sheet for these counterparties.
We determine the balance sheet netting adjustments based on the terms specified within each master netting arrangement. We disclose the balance sheet netting amounts within the column titled “Gross amounts offset in consolidated balance sheet.” Balance sheet netting adjustments are determined at the counterparty level for which there may be multiple contract types. For disclosure purposes, we allocate these adjustments to the contract type for each counterparty proportionally based upon the “Gross amounts recognized” by counterparty. As a result, the net amounts disclosed by contract type may not represent the actual exposure upon settlement of the contracts.Balance sheet netting does not include non-cash collateral that we receive and pledge. For disclosure purposes, we present the fair value of this non-cash collateral in the column titled “Gross amounts not offset in consolidated balance sheet (Disclosure-only netting)” within the table. We determine and allocate the Disclosure-only netting amounts in the same manner as balance sheet netting amounts.
 
The “Net amounts” column within the following table represents the aggregate of our net exposure to each counterparty after considering the balance sheet and Disclosure-only netting adjustments. We manage derivative exposure by monitoring the credit risk associated with each counterparty using counterparty specific credit risk limits, using master netting arrangements and obtaining collateral. Derivative contracts executed in over-the-counter markets include bilateral contractual arrangements that are not cleared through a central clearing organization but are typically subject to master netting arrangements. The percentage of our bilateral derivative transactions outstanding at period end in such markets, based on gross fair value, is provided within the following table. Other derivative contracts executed in over-the-counter or exchange-traded markets are settled through a central clearing organization and are excluded from this percentage. In addition to the netting amounts included in the table, we also have balance sheet netting related to resale and repurchase agreements that are disclosed within Note 10 (Guarantees, Pledged Assets and Collateral).


118

Note 12: Derivatives (continued)

(in millions)
Gross
amounts
recognized

 
Gross amounts
offset in
consolidated
balance
sheet (1)

 
Net amounts in
consolidated
balance
sheet (2)

 
Gross amounts
not offset in
consolidated
balance sheet
(Disclosure-only
netting) (3)

 
Net
amounts

 
Percent
exchanged in
over-the-counter
market (4)

March 31, 2015
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

Derivative assets
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

Interest rate contracts
$
83,194

 
(77,500
)
 
5,694

 
(877
)
 
4,817

 
35
%
Commodity contracts
6,879

 
(1,308
)
 
5,571

 
(1
)
 
5,570

 
29

Equity contracts
9,130

 
(2,992
)
 
6,138

 
(447
)
 
5,691

 
54

Foreign exchange contracts
9,751

 
(5,586
)
 
4,165

 
(13
)
 
4,152

 
98

Credit contracts-protection sold
172

 
(117
)
 
55

 

 
55

 
71

Credit contracts-protection purchased
710

 
(626
)
 
84

 
(2
)
 
82

 
100

Total derivative assets
$
109,836

 
(88,129
)
 
21,707

 
(1,340
)
 
20,367

 
  
Derivative liabilities
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Interest rate contracts
$
78,183

 
(73,377
)
 
4,806

 
(3,593
)
 
1,213

 
31
%
Commodity contracts
7,523

 
(1,411
)
 
6,112

 
(189
)
 
5,923

 
83

Equity contracts
6,783

 
(2,511
)
 
4,272

 
(334
)
 
3,938

 
84

Foreign exchange contracts
11,616

 
(8,530
)
 
3,086

 
(273
)
 
2,813

 
100

Credit contracts-protection sold
851

 
(826
)
 
25

 
(22
)
 
3

 
100

Credit contracts-protection purchased
194

 
(122
)
 
72

 
(72
)
 

 
65

Other contracts
52

 

 
52

 

 
52

 
100

Total derivative liabilities
$
105,202

 
(86,777
)
 
18,425

 
(4,483
)
 
13,942

 
  
December 31, 2014
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

Derivative assets
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

Interest rate contracts
$
63,698

 
(56,051
)
 
7,647

 
(769
)
 
6,878

 
45
%
Commodity contracts
7,461

 
(1,233
)
 
6,228

 
(72
)
 
6,156

 
27

Equity contracts
9,005

 
(2,842
)
 
6,163

 
(405
)
 
5,758

 
54

Foreign exchange contracts
7,404

 
(4,923
)
 
2,481

 
(85
)
 
2,396

 
98

Credit contracts-protection sold
151

 
(131
)
 
20

 

 
20

 
90

Credit contracts-protection purchased
755

 
(689
)
 
66

 
(1
)
 
65

 
100

Total derivative assets
$
88,474

 
(65,869
)
 
22,605

 
(1,332
)
 
21,273

 
  
Derivative liabilities
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Interest rate contracts
$
60,059

 
(54,394
)
 
5,665

 
(4,244
)
 
1,421

 
44
%
Commodity contracts
7,702

 
(1,459
)
 
6,243

 
(33
)
 
6,210

 
81

Equity contracts
7,038

 
(2,845
)
 
4,193

 
(484
)
 
3,709

 
82

Foreign exchange contracts
7,827

 
(5,511
)
 
2,316

 
(270
)
 
2,046

 
100

Credit contracts-protection sold
943

 
(713
)
 
230

 
(199
)
 
31

 
100

Credit contracts-protection purchased
168

 
(121
)
 
47

 
(18
)
 
29

 
86

Other contracts
44

 

 
44

 

 
44

 
100

Total derivative liabilities
$
83,781

 
(65,043
)
 
18,738

 
(5,248
)
 
13,490

 
  
(1)
Represents amounts with counterparties subject to enforceable master netting arrangements that have been offset in the consolidated balance sheet, including related cash collateral and portfolio level counterparty valuation adjustments. Counterparty valuation adjustments were $313 million and $266 million related to derivative assets and $50 million and $56 million related to derivative liabilities at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Cash collateral totaled $6.8 billion and $5.7 billion , netted against derivative assets and liabilities, respectively, at March 31, 2015, and $5.2 billion and $4.6 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2014.
(2)
Net derivative assets of $17.1 billion and $16.9 billion are classified in Trading assets at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. $4.6 billion and $5.7 billion are classified in Other assets in the consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Net derivative liabilities are classified in Accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.
(3)
Represents non-cash collateral pledged and received against derivative assets and liabilities with the same counterparty that are subject to enforceable master netting arrangements. U.S. GAAP does not permit netting of such non-cash collateral balances in the consolidated balance sheet but requires disclosure of these amounts.
(4)
Represents derivatives executed in over-the-counter markets that are not settled through a central clearing organization. Over-the-counter percentages are calculated based on gross amounts recognized as of the respective balance sheet date. The remaining percentage represents derivatives settled through a central clearing organization, which are executed in either over-the-counter or exchange-traded markets.




119


Fair Value Hedges
We use derivatives to hedge against changes in fair value of certain financial instruments, including available-for-sale debt securities, mortgages held for sale, and long-term debt. For more information on fair value hedges, see Note 16 (Derivatives) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K.
The following table shows the net gains (losses) recognized in the income statement related to derivatives in fair value hedging relationships. The entire derivative gain or loss is
 
included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness for all fair value hedge relationships, except for those involving foreign-currency denominated available-for-sale securities and long-term debt hedged with foreign currency forward derivatives for which the time value component of the derivative gain or loss related to the changes in the difference between the spot and forward price is excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
 

  
Interest rate
contracts hedging:
 
 
Foreign exchange
contracts hedging:
 
 
Total net
gains
(losses)
on fair
value
hedges

(in millions)
Available-
for-sale
securities

 
Mortgages
held for
sale

 
Long-term
debt

 
Available-
for-sale
securities

 
Long-term
debt

 
Quarter ended March 31, 2015
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  
Net interest income (expense) recognized on derivatives
$
(186
)
 
(3
)
 
472

 
1

 
61

 
345

Gains (losses) recorded in noninterest income
  
 
  
 
  
 
  

 
  
 
  
Recognized on derivatives
(666
)
 
(13
)
 
1,258

 
280

 
(1,887
)
 
(1,028
)
Recognized on hedged item
661

 
10

 
(1,150
)
 
(269
)
 
1,949

 
1,201

Net recognized on fair value hedges (ineffective portion) (1)
$
(5
)

(3
)

108


11


62

 
173

Quarter ended March 31, 2014
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

Net interest income (expense) recognized on derivatives
$
(175
)
 
(3
)
 
448

 
(2
)
 
73

 
341

Gains (losses) recorded in noninterest income
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  
 
  
Recognized on derivatives
(505
)
 
(15
)
 
988

 
(14
)
 
74

 
528

Recognized on hedged item
497

 
11

 
(853
)
 
11

 
(74
)
 
(408
)
Net recognized on fair value hedges (ineffective portion) (1)
$
(8
)
 
(4
)
 
135

 
(3
)
 

 
120

(1)
Included $(1) million and $0 million, respectively, for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, of the time value component recognized as net interest income (expense) on forward derivatives hedging foreign currency available-for-sale securities and long-term debt that were excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
Cash Flow Hedges
We use derivatives to hedge certain financial instruments against future interest rate increases and to limit the variability of cash flows on certain financial instruments due to changes in the benchmark interest rate. For more information on cash flow hedges, see Note 16 (Derivatives) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K.
Based upon current interest rates, we estimate that $852 million (pre tax) of deferred net gains on derivatives in OCI
 
at March 31, 2015, will be reclassified into net interest income during the next twelve months. Future changes to interest rates may significantly change actual amounts reclassified to earnings. We are hedging our exposure to the variability of future cash flows for all forecasted transactions for a maximum of 7 years.
The following table shows the net gains (losses) recognized related to derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships.
 

  
Quarter ended March 31,
 
(in millions)
2015

 
2014

Gains (losses) (pre tax) recognized in OCI on derivatives
$
952

 
44

Gains (pre tax) reclassified from cumulative OCI into net income (1)
234

 
106

Gains (losses) (pre tax) recognized in noninterest income for hedge ineffectiveness (2)
1

 

  
(1)
See Note 17 (Other Comprehensive Income) for detail on components of net income.
(2)
None of the change in value of the derivatives was excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. 

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
We use economic hedges primarily to hedge the risk of changes in the fair value of certain residential MHFS, certain loans held for investment, residential MSRs measured at fair value, derivative loan commitments and other interests held. The resulting gain or loss on these economic hedge derivatives is reflected in mortgage banking noninterest income, net gains (losses) from equity investments and other noninterest income.
The derivatives used to hedge MSRs measured at fair value, resulted in net derivative gains of $881 million in first quarter 2015, and $848 million in first quarter 2014, which are included in mortgage banking noninterest income. The aggregate fair value of these derivatives was a net asset of $489 million at March 31, 2015, and $492 million at December 31, 2014. The
 
change in fair value of these derivatives for each period end is due to changes in the underlying market indices and interest rates as well as the purchase and sale of derivative financial instruments throughout the period as part of our dynamic MSR risk management process.
Interest rate lock commitments for mortgage loans that we intend to sell are considered derivatives. The aggregate fair value of derivative loan commitments on the balance sheet was a net asset of $200 million and $98 million at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively, and is included in the caption “Interest rate contracts” under “Customer accommodation, trading and other derivatives” in the first table in this Note.
For more information on economic hedges and other derivatives, see Note 16 (Derivatives) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K.


120

Note 12: Derivatives (continued)

The following table shows the net gains recognized in the income statement related to derivatives not designated as hedging instruments.
 
 

  
Quarter ended March 31,
 
(in millions)
2015

 
2014

Net gains (losses) recognized on economic hedges derivatives:
  

 
  

Interest rate contracts
Recognized in noninterest income:
  

 
  

Mortgage banking (1)
$
647

 
366

Other (2)
(64
)
 
(59
)
Equity contracts (3)
(20
)
 
76

Foreign exchange contracts (2)
648

 
69

Subtotal (4)
1,211

 
452

Net gains (losses) recognized on customer accommodation, trading and other derivatives:
  

 
  

Interest rate contracts
Recognized in noninterest income:
  

 
  

Mortgage banking (5)
387

 
290

Other (6)
(93
)
 
(391
)
Commodity contracts (6)
31

 
50

Equity contracts (6)
189

 
(94
)
Foreign exchange contracts (6)
110

 
262

Credit contracts (6)
(8
)
 
27

Other (4)(6)
(8
)
 
(7
)
Subtotal (4)
608

 
137

Net gains recognized related to derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
$
1,819

 
589

(1)
Predominantly mortgage banking noninterest income including gains (losses) on the derivatives used as economic hedges of MSRs measured at fair value, interest rate lock commitments and mortgages held for sale.
(2)
Predominantly included in other noninterest income.
(3)
Predominantly included in net gains (losses) from equity investments in noninterest income.
(4)
Prior period has been revised to conform with current period presentation.
(5)
Predominantly mortgage banking noninterest income including gains (losses) on interest rate lock commitments.
(6)
Predominantly included in net gains from trading activities in noninterest income.


121


Credit Derivatives
Credit derivative contracts are arrangements whose value is derived from the transfer of credit risk of a reference asset or entity from one party (the purchaser of credit protection) to another party (the seller of credit protection). We use credit derivatives primarily to assist customers with their risk management objectives. We may also use credit derivatives in structured product transactions or liquidity agreements written to special purpose vehicles. The maximum exposure of sold credit derivatives is managed through posted collateral, purchased credit derivatives and similar products in order to achieve our desired credit risk profile. This credit risk management provides an ability to recover a significant portion of any amounts that would be paid under the sold credit derivatives. We would be
 
required to perform under the noted credit derivatives in the event of default by the referenced obligors. Events of default include events such as bankruptcy, capital restructuring or lack of principal and/or interest payment. In certain cases, other triggers may exist, such as the credit downgrade of the referenced obligors or the inability of the special purpose vehicle for which we have provided liquidity to obtain funding.
The following table provides details of sold and purchased credit derivatives.

  
  
 
Notional amount
 
 
  
(in millions)
Fair value
liability

 
Protection
sold (A)

 
Protection
sold -
non-
investment
grade

 
Protection
purchased
with
identical
underlyings (B)

 
Net
protection
sold
(A) - (B)

 
Other
protection
purchased

 
Range of
maturities
March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Credit default swaps on:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Corporate bonds
$
15

 
5,978

 
2,269

 
4,457

 
1,521

 
2,622

 
2015 - 2021
Structured products
586

 
971

 
790

 
572

 
399

 
236

 
2017 - 2052
Credit protection on:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
Default swap index

 
2,906

 
427

 
2,106

 
800

 
1,286

 
2015 - 2020
Commercial mortgage-backed securities index
230

 
965

 

 
747

 
218

 
384

 
2047 - 2052
Asset-backed securities index
19

 
51

 
1

 
1

 
50

 
78

 
2045 - 2046
Other
1

 
2,336

 
2,336

 

 
2,336

 
5,447

 
2015 - 2025
Total credit derivatives
$
851

 
13,207

 
5,823

 
7,883

 
5,324

 
10,053

 
 
December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Credit default swaps on:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Corporate bonds
$
23

 
6,344

 
2,904

 
4,894

 
1,450

 
2,831

 
2015 - 2021
Structured products
654

 
1,055

 
874

 
608

 
447

 
277

 
2017 - 2052
Credit protection on:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Default swap index

 
1,659

 
292

 
777

 
882

 
1,042

 
2015 - 2019
Commercial mortgage-backed securities index
246

 
1,058

 

 
608

 
450

 
355

 
2047 - 2063
Asset-backed securities index
19

 
52

 
1

 
1

 
51

 
81

 
2045 - 2046
Other
1

 
2,136

 
2,136

 

 
2,136

 
5,185

 
2015 - 2025
Total credit derivatives
$
943

 
12,304

 
6,207

 
6,888

 
5,416

 
9,771

 
 

Protection sold represents the estimated maximum exposure to loss that would be incurred under an assumed hypothetical circumstance, where the value of our interests and any associated collateral declines to zero, without any consideration of recovery or offset from any economic hedges. We believe this hypothetical circumstance to be an extremely remote possibility and accordingly, this required disclosure is not an indication of expected loss. The amounts under non-investment grade represent the notional amounts of those credit derivatives on which we have a higher risk of being required to perform under the terms of the credit derivative and are a function of the underlying assets.
 
We consider the risk of performance to be high if the underlying assets under the credit derivative have an external rating that is below investment grade or an internal credit default grade that is equivalent thereto. We believe the net protection sold, which is representative of the net notional amount of protection sold and purchased with identical underlyings, in combination with other protection purchased, is more representative of our exposure to loss than either non-investment grade or protection sold. Other protection purchased represents additional protection, which may offset the exposure to loss for protection sold, that was not purchased with an identical underlying of the protection sold.



122

Note 12: Derivatives (continued)

Credit-Risk Contingent Features
Certain of our derivative contracts contain provisions whereby if the credit rating of our debt were to be downgraded by certain major credit rating agencies, the counterparty could demand additional collateral or require termination or replacement of derivative instruments in a net liability position. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with such credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a net liability position was $13.4 billion at March 31, 2015, and $13.6 billion at December 31, 2014, for which we posted $9.3 billion and $10.5 billion, respectively, in collateral in the normal course of business. If the credit rating of our debt had been downgraded below investment grade, which is the credit-risk-related contingent feature that if triggered requires the maximum amount of collateral to be posted, on March 31, 2015, or December 31, 2014, we would have been required to post additional collateral of $4.1 billion or $3.1 billion, respectively, or potentially settle the contract in an amount equal to its fair value. Some contracts require that we provide more collateral than the fair value of derivatives that are in a net liability position if a downgrade occurs.
 
 
Counterparty Credit Risk
By using derivatives, we are exposed to counterparty credit risk if counterparties to the derivative contracts do not perform as expected. If a counterparty fails to perform, our counterparty credit risk is equal to the amount reported as a derivative asset on our balance sheet. The amounts reported as a derivative asset are derivative contracts in a gain position, and to the extent subject to legally enforceable master netting arrangements, net of derivatives in a loss position with the same counterparty and cash collateral received. We minimize counterparty credit risk through credit approvals, limits, monitoring procedures, executing master netting arrangements and obtaining collateral, where appropriate. To the extent the master netting arrangements and other criteria meet the applicable requirements, including determining the legal enforceability of the arrangement, it is our policy to present derivative balances and related cash collateral amounts net on the balance sheet. We incorporate credit valuation adjustments (CVA) to reflect counterparty credit risk in determining the fair value of our derivatives. Such adjustments, which consider the effects of enforceable master netting agreements and collateral arrangements, reflect market-based views of the credit quality of each counterparty. Our CVA calculation is determined based on observed credit spreads in the credit default swap market and indices indicative of the credit quality of the counterparties to our derivatives.



123


Note 13:  Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities

We use fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis are presented in the recurring table in this Note. From time to time, we may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as certain residential and commercial MHFS, certain LHFS, loans held for investment and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.
See Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K for discussion of how we determine fair value. For descriptions of the valuation methodologies we use for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis and for estimating fair value for financial instruments that are not recorded at fair value, see Note 17 (Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K.
 
FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY  We group our assets and liabilities measured at fair value in three levels based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:
Level 1 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
 
Level 2 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
Level 3 – Valuation is generated from techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

Fair Value Measurements from Vendors
For certain assets and liabilities, we obtain fair value measurements from vendors, which predominantly consist of third party pricing services, and record the unadjusted fair value in our financial statements. For additional information, see Note 17 (Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K. The detail by level is shown in the table below. Fair value measurements obtained from brokers or third party pricing services that we have adjusted to determine the fair value recorded in our financial statements are not included in the following table.

 
  
Brokers
 
 
Third party pricing services
 
(in millions)
Level 1

 
Level 2

 
Level 3

 
Level 1

 
Level 2

 
Level 3

March 31, 2015
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Trading assets (excluding derivatives)
$

 

 

 

 
68

 

Available-for-sale securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

 

 

 
24,023

 
6,008

 

Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions

 
27

 

 

 
45,359

 
59

Mortgage-backed securities

 
187

 

 

 
127,606

 
104

Other debt securities (1)

 
1,002

 
626

 

 
43,676

 
520

Total debt securities

 
1,216

 
626

 
24,023

 
222,649

 
683

Total marketable equity securities

 

 

 

 
570

 

Total available-for-sale securities

 
1,216

 
626

 
24,023

 
223,219

 
683

Derivatives (trading and other assets)

 

 

 

 
286

 

Derivatives (liabilities)

 

 

 

 
(281
)
 

Other liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2014
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Trading assets (excluding derivatives)
$

 

 

 
2

 
105

 

Available-for-sale securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

 

 

 
19,899

 
5,905

 

Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions

 

 

 

 
42,666

 
61

Mortgage-backed securities

 
152

 

 

 
135,997

 
133

Other debt securities (1)

 
1,035

 
601

 

 
41,933

 
541

Total debt securities

 
1,187

 
601

 
19,899

 
226,501

 
735

Total marketable equity securities

 

 

 

 
569

 

Total available-for-sale securities

 
1,187

 
601

 
19,899

 
227,070

 
735

Derivatives (trading and other assets)

 
1

 

 

 
290

 

Derivatives (liabilities)

 
(1
)
 

 

 
(292
)
 

Other liabilities

 

 

 

 
(1
)
 

(1)
Includes corporate debt securities, collateralized loan and other debt obligations, asset-backed securities, and other debt securities.

124

Note 13: Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (continued)

Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
 
The following two tables present the balances of assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.


(in millions)
Level 1

 
Level 2

 
Level 3

  
Netting

  
Total

March 31, 2015
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Trading assets (excluding derivatives)
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
$
10,161

 
4,430

 

  

  
14,591

Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions

 
3,034

 
6

  

  
3,040

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations (1)

 
288

 
381

  

  
669

Corporate debt securities

 
8,455

 
31

  

  
8,486

Mortgage-backed securities

 
19,575

 

  

  
19,575

Asset-backed securities

 
780

 
81

  

  
861

Equity securities
13,676

 
122

 
10

  

  
13,808

Total trading securities (2)
23,837

 
36,684

 
509

 

  
61,030

Other trading assets

 
1,117

 
64

  

  
1,181

Total trading assets (excluding derivatives)
23,837

 
37,801

 
573

 

  
62,211

Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
24,023

 
6,008

 

  

  
30,031

Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions

 
45,400

 
1,980

(3)

  
47,380

Mortgage-backed securities:
  
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
Federal agencies

 
103,217

 

  

  
103,217

Residential

 
8,723

 

  

  
8,723

Commercial

 
15,885

 
104

  

  
15,989

Total mortgage-backed securities

 
127,825

 
104

 

  
127,929

Corporate debt securities
83

 
14,738

 
312

  

  
15,133

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations (4)

 
26,669

 
1,053

(3)

  
27,722

Asset-backed securities:
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Auto loans and leases

 
33

 
249

(3)

  
282

Home equity loans

 
567

 

  

  
567

Other asset-backed securities

 
3,827

 
1,206

(3)

  
5,033

Total asset-backed securities

 
4,427

 
1,455

  

  
5,882

Other debt securities

 
22

 

  

  
22

Total debt securities
24,106

 
225,089

 
4,904

  

  
254,099

Marketable equity securities:
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Perpetual preferred securities (5)
482

 
570

 
640

(3)

  
1,692

Other marketable equity securities
1,788

 
24

 

  

  
1,812

Total marketable equity securities
2,270

 
594

 
640

 

  
3,504

Total available-for-sale securities
26,376

 
225,683

 
5,544

 

  
257,603

Mortgages held for sale

 
16,917

 
2,098

  

  
19,015

Loans held for sale

 
1

 

  

  
1

Loans

 

 
5,730

  

  
5,730

Mortgage servicing rights (residential)

 

 
11,739

  

  
11,739

Derivative assets:
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Interest rate contracts
83

 
82,639

 
472

  

  
83,194

Commodity contracts

 
6,858

 
21

  

  
6,879

Equity contracts
4,234

 
3,711

 
1,185

  

  
9,130

Foreign exchange contracts
54

 
9,697

 

  

  
9,751

Credit contracts

 
449

 
433

  

  
882

Netting

 

 

  
(88,129
)
(6)
(88,129
)
Total derivative assets (7)
4,371

 
103,354

 
2,111

  
(88,129
)
 
21,707

Other assets

 

 
2,628

  

  
2,628

Total assets recorded at fair value
$
54,584

 
383,756

 
30,423

  
(88,129
)
  
380,634

Derivative liabilities:
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Interest rate contracts
$
(30
)
 
(78,119
)
 
(34
)
  

  
(78,183
)
Commodity contracts

 
(7,500
)
 
(23
)
  

  
(7,523
)
Equity contracts
(1,054
)
 
(4,358
)
 
(1,371
)
  

  
(6,783
)
Foreign exchange contracts
(52
)
 
(11,564
)
 

  

  
(11,616
)
Credit contracts

 
(458
)
 
(587
)
  

  
(1,045
)
Other derivative contracts

 

 
(52
)
  

  
(52
)
Netting

 

 

  
86,777

(6)
86,777

Total derivative liabilities (7)
(1,136
)
 
(101,999
)
 
(2,067
)
  
86,777

  
(18,425
)
Short sale liabilities:
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
(11,032
)
 
(1,377
)
 

  

  
(12,409
)
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions

 
(18
)
 

  

  
(18
)
Corporate debt securities

 
(4,552
)
 

  

  
(4,552
)
Equity securities
(2,476
)
 
(3
)
 

  

  
(2,479
)
Other securities

 
(316
)
 
(15
)
  

  
(331
)
Total short sale liabilities
(13,508
)
 
(6,266
)
 
(15
)
  

  
(19,789
)
Other liabilities (excluding derivatives)

 

 
(27
)
  

  
(27
)
Total liabilities recorded at fair value
$
(14,644
)
 
(108,265
)
 
(2,109
)
  
86,777

  
(38,241
)
(1)
The entire balance only consists of collateralized loan obligations. 
(2)
Net gains from trading activities recognized in the income statement for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 include $(430) million and $(3) million in net unrealized losses on trading securities held at March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. 
(3)
Balances consist of securities that are mostly investment grade based on ratings received from the ratings agencies or internal credit grades categorized as investment grade if external ratings are not available. The securities are classified as Level 3 due to limited market activity.
(4)
Includes collateralized debt obligations of $487 million
(5)
Perpetual preferred securities include ARS and corporate preferred securities. See Note 7 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) for additional information.
(6)
Represents balance sheet netting of derivative asset and liability balances, related cash collateral and portfolio level counterparty valuation adjustments. See Note 12 (Derivatives) for additional information.
(7)
Derivative assets and derivative liabilities include contracts qualifying for hedge accounting, economic hedges, and derivatives included in trading assets and trading liabilities, respectively.
 
(continued on following page)

125


(continued from previous page)
(in millions)  
Level 1

 
Level 2

 
Level 3

  
Netting

  
Total

December 31, 2014
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Trading assets (excluding derivatives)  
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies  
$
10,506

 
3,886

 

  

  
14,392

Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions  

 
1,537

 
7

  

  
1,544

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations (1)

 
274

 
445

  

  
719

Corporate debt securities  

 
7,517

 
54

  

  
7,571

Mortgage-backed securities  

 
16,273

 

  

  
16,273

Asset-backed securities  

 
776

 
79

  

  
855

Equity securities  
18,512

 
38

 
10

  

  
18,560

Total trading securities (2)
29,018

 
30,301

 
595

 

  
59,914

Other trading assets  

 
1,398

 
55

  

  
1,453

Total trading assets (excluding derivatives)  
29,018

 
31,699

 
650

 

  
61,367

Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies  
19,899

 
5,905

 

  

  
25,804

Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions

 
42,667

 
2,277

(3)

  
44,944

Mortgage-backed securities:  
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Federal agencies  

 
110,089

 

  

  
110,089

Residential  

 
9,245

 
24

  

  
9,269

Commercial  

 
16,885

 
109

  

  
16,994

Total mortgage-backed securities  

 
136,219

 
133

 

  
136,352

Corporate debt securities  
83

 
14,451

 
252

  

  
14,786

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations (4)

 
24,274

 
1,087

(3)

  
25,361

Asset-backed securities:  
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Auto loans and leases  

 
31

 
245

(3)

  
276

Home equity loans  

 
662

 

  

  
662

Other asset-backed securities  

 
4,189

 
1,372

(3)

  
5,561

Total asset-backed securities  

 
4,882

 
1,617

  

  
6,499

Other debt securities  

 
20

 

  

  
20

Total debt securities  
19,982

 
228,418

 
5,366

  

  
253,766

Marketable equity securities:  
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Perpetual preferred securities (5)
468

 
569

 
663

(3)

  
1,700

Other marketable equity securities  
1,952

 
24

 

  

  
1,976

Total marketable equity securities  
2,420

 
593

 
663

 

  
3,676

Total available-for-sale securities  
22,402

 
229,011

 
6,029

 

  
257,442

Mortgages held for sale   

 
13,252

 
2,313

  

  
15,565

Loans held for sale  

 
1

 

  

  
1

Loans  

 

 
5,788

  

  
5,788

Mortgage servicing rights (residential)  

 

 
12,738

  

  
12,738

Derivative assets:  
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Interest rate contracts  
27

 
63,306

 
365

  

  
63,698

Commodity contracts  

 
7,438

 
23

  

  
7,461

Equity contracts  
4,102

 
3,544

 
1,359

  

  
9,005

Foreign exchange contracts  
65

 
7,339

 

  

  
7,404

Credit contracts  

 
440

 
466

  

  
906

Netting  

 

 

  
(65,869
)
(6)
(65,869
)
Total derivative assets (7)
4,194

 
82,067

 
2,213

  
(65,869
)
  
22,605

Other assets  

 

 
2,593

  

  
2,593

Total assets recorded at fair value  
$
55,614

 
356,030

 
32,324

  
(65,869
)
  
378,099

Derivative liabilities:  
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Interest rate contracts  
$
(29
)
 
(59,958
)
 
(72
)
  

  
(60,059
)
Commodity contracts  

 
(7,680
)
 
(22
)
  

  
(7,702
)
Equity contracts  
(1,290
)
 
(4,305
)
 
(1,443
)
  

  
(7,038
)
Foreign exchange contracts  
(60
)
 
(7,767
)
 

  

  
(7,827
)
Credit contracts  

 
(456
)
 
(655
)
  

  
(1,111
)
Other derivative contracts  

 

 
(44
)
  

  
(44
)
Netting  

 

 

  
65,043

(6)
65,043

Total derivative liabilities (7)
(1,379
)
 
(80,166
)
 
(2,236
)
  
65,043

  
(18,738
)
Short sale liabilities:  
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies  
(7,043
)
 
(1,636
)
 

  

  
(8,679
)
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions  

 
(26
)
 

  

  
(26
)
Corporate debt securities  

 
(5,055
)
 

  

  
(5,055
)
Equity securities  
(2,259
)
 
(2
)
 

  

  
(2,261
)
Other securities  

 
(73
)
 
(6
)
  

  
(79
)
Total short sale liabilities  
(9,302
)
 
(6,792
)
 
(6
)
  

  
(16,100
)
Other liabilities (excluding derivatives)  

 

 
(28
)
  

  
(28
)
Total liabilities recorded at fair value  
$
(10,681
)
 
(86,958
)
 
(2,270
)
  
65,043

  
(34,866
)
(1)
The entire balance only consists of collateralized loan obligations.
(2)
Net gains from trading activities recognized in the income statement for the year ended December 31, 2014, include $211 million in net unrealized losses on trading securities held at December 31, 2014.
(3)
Balances consist of securities that are mostly investment grade based on ratings received from the ratings agencies or internal credit grades categorized as investment grade if external ratings are not available. The securities are classified as Level 3 due to limited market activity.
(4)
Includes collateralized debt obligations of $500 million
(5)
Perpetual preferred securities include ARS and corporate preferred securities. See Note 7 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) for additional information.
(6)
Represents balance sheet netting of derivative asset and liability balances, related cash collateral and portfolio level counterparty valuation adjustments. See Note 12 (Derivatives) for additional information.
(7)
Derivative assets and derivative liabilities include contracts qualifying for hedge accounting, economic hedges, and derivatives included in trading assets and trading liabilities, respectively.

126

Note 13: Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (continued)

Changes in Fair Value Levels
We monitor the availability of observable market data to assess the appropriate classification of financial instruments within the fair value hierarchy and transfer between Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 accordingly. Observable market data includes but is not limited to quoted prices and market transactions. Changes in economic conditions or market liquidity generally will drive changes in availability of observable market data. Changes in availability of observable market data, which also may result in
 
changing the valuation technique used, are generally the cause of transfers between Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3.
Transfers into and out of Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 for the periods presented are provided within the following table. The amounts reported as transfers represent the fair value as of the beginning of the quarter in which the transfer occurred.
 


  
Transfers Between Fair Value Levels
 
  
  
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3 (1)
 
  
(in millions)
In
 
Out
 
In
 
Out
 
In
 
Out
 
Total  
Quarter ended March 31, 2015
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Trading assets (excluding derivatives)
$
15

 
(2
)
 
10

 
(16
)
 
1

 
(8
)
 

Available-for-sale securities

 

 
52

 

 

 
(52
)
 

Mortgages held for sale

 

 
67

 
(42
)
 
42

 
(67
)
 

Loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net derivative assets and liabilities (2)

 

 
34

 
12

 
(12
)
 
(34
)
 

Short sale liabilities
(1
)
 

 

 
1

 

 

 

Total transfers
$
14

 
(2
)
 
163

 
(45
)
 
31

 
(161
)
 

Quarter ended March 31, 2014
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Trading assets (excluding derivatives
$

 

 
2

 
(28
)
 
28

 
(2
)
 

Available-for-sale securities

 
(8
)
 
8

 
(95
)
 
95

 

 

Mortgages held for sale

 

 
24

 
(57
)
 
57

 
(24
)
 

Loans

 

 
49

 

 

 
(49
)
 

Net derivative assets and liabilities (2)

 

 
45

 
(3
)
 
3

 
(45
)
 

Short sale liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total transfers
$

 
(8
)
 
128

 
(183
)
 
183

 
(120
)
 

(1)
All transfers in and out of Level 3 are disclosed within the recurring Level 3 rollforward table in this Note.
(2)
Includes net derivative assets that were transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 due to increased observable market data. Also includes net derivative liabilities that were transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 due to a decrease in observable market data.



127


The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, are summarized as follows:
  
  

 
Total net gains
(losses) included in
 
 
Purchases,
sales,
issuances
and
settlements,
net (1)

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
Net unrealized
gains (losses)
included in
income related
to assets and
liabilities held
at period end

  
(in millions)
Balance,
beginning
of period

 
Net
income

 
Other
compre-
hensive
income

 
 
Transfers
into
Level 3

 
Transfers
out of
Level 3

 
Balance,
end of
period

 
(2)
Quarter ended March 31, 2015
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
Trading assets (excluding derivatives):
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
Securities of U.S. states and
political subdivisions
$
7

 

 

 
(1
)
 

 

 
6

 

  
Collateralized loan and other
debt obligations
445

 
21

 

 
(85
)
 

 

 
381

 
(3
)
  
Corporate debt securities
54

 
2

 

 
(18
)
 

 
(7
)
 
31

 

  
Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
Asset-backed securities
79

 
16

 

 
(14
)
 

 

 
81

 
16

  
Equity securities
10

 

 

 

 

 

 
10

 

  
Total trading securities
595


39




(118
)



(7
)

509


13

  
Other trading assets
55

 
6

 

 
3

 
1

 
(1
)
 
64

 
8

 
Total trading assets
(excluding derivatives)
650


45




(115
)

1


(8
)

573


21

(3)
Available-for-sale securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
  
Securities of U.S. states and
political subdivisions
2,277

 
(1
)
 
(3
)
 
(241
)
 

 
(52
)
 
1,980

 
(5
)
  
Mortgage-backed securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 


 
  
  
Residential
24

 
4

 
(6
)
 
(22
)
 

 

 

 

  
Commercial
109

 
1

 
(1
)
 
(5
)
 

 

 
104

 

  
Total mortgage-backed securities
133


5


(7
)

(27
)





104



 
Corporate debt securities
252

 

 

 
60

 

 

 
312

 

  
Collateralized loan and other
debt obligations
1,087

 
29

 
(16
)
 
(47
)
 

 

 
1,053

 

  
Asset-backed securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 


 
  
  
Auto loans and leases
245

 

 
4

 

 

 

 
249

 

  
Home equity loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
Other asset-backed securities
1,372

 
1

 
(11
)
 
(156
)
 

 

 
1,206

 

  
Total asset-backed securities
1,617


1


(7
)

(156
)





1,455



  
Total debt securities
5,366


34


(33
)

(411
)



(52
)

4,904


(5
)
(4)
Marketable equity securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
  
Perpetual preferred securities
663

 
3

 
(2
)
 
(24
)
 

 

 
640

 

  
Total marketable
equity securities
663


3


(2
)

(24
)





640



(5)
Total available-for-sale
securities
6,029


37


(35
)

(435
)



(52
)

5,544


(5
)
  
Mortgages held for sale
2,313

 
38

 

 
(228
)
 
42

 
(67
)
 
2,098

 
22

(6)
Loans
5,788

 
(6
)
 

 
(52
)
 

 

 
5,730

 
(2
)
(6)
Mortgage servicing rights (residential) (7)
12,738

 
(1,306
)
 

 
307

 

 

 
11,739

 
(773
)
(6)
Net derivative assets and liabilities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 


 
  
  
Interest rate contracts
293

 
482

 

 
(337
)
 

 

 
438

 
214

  
Commodity contracts
1

 
(1
)
 

 

 
(2
)
 

 
(2
)
 
(2
)
  
Equity contracts
(84
)
 
(7
)
 

 
(51
)
 
(10
)
 
(34
)
 
(186
)
 
(33
)
  
Foreign exchange contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
Credit contracts
(189
)
 
(2
)
 

 
37

 

 

 
(154
)
 
(1
)
  
Other derivative contracts
(44
)
 
(8
)
 

 

 

 

 
(52
)
 
(9
)
  
Total derivative contracts
(23
)

464




(351
)

(12
)

(34
)

44


169

(8)
Other assets
2,593

 
38

 

 
(3
)
 

 

 
2,628

 
37

(3)
Short sale liabilities
(6
)
 

 

 
(9
)
 

 

 
(15
)
 

(3)
Other liabilities (excluding derivatives)
(28
)
 
1

 

 

 

 

 
(27
)
 

(6)
(1)
See next page for detail.
(2)
Represents only net gains (losses) that are due to changes in economic conditions and management’s estimates of fair value and excludes changes due to the collection/realization of cash flows over time.
(3)
Included in net gains (losses) from trading activities and other noninterest income in the income statement.
(4)
Included in net gains (losses) from debt securities in the income statement.
(5)
Included in net gains (losses) from equity investments in the income statement.
(6)
Included in mortgage banking and other noninterest income in the income statement.
(7)
For more information on the changes in mortgage servicing rights, see Note 8 (Mortgage Banking Activities).
(8)
Included in mortgage banking, trading activities, equity investments and other noninterest income in the income statement.
 

(continued on following page)






128

Note 13: Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (continued)

(continued from previous page)
 
The following table presents gross purchases, sales, issuances and settlements related to the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the quarter ended March 31, 2015.
(in millions)
Purchases

 
Sales

 
Issuances

 
Settlements

 
Net

Quarter ended March 31, 2015
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Trading assets (excluding derivatives):
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
$

 
(1
)
 

 

 
(1
)
Collateralized loan and other debt obligations
400

 
(485
)
 

 

 
(85
)
Corporate debt securities
15

 
(33
)
 

 

 
(18
)
Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

Asset-backed securities

 
(5
)
 

 
(9
)
 
(14
)
Equity securities

 

 

 

 

Total trading securities
415

 
(524
)
 

 
(9
)
 
(118
)
Other trading assets
3

 

 

 

 
3

Total trading assets (excluding derivatives)
418

 
(524
)
 

 
(9
)
 
(115
)
Available-for-sale securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions

 
(20
)
 
55

 
(276
)
 
(241
)
Mortgage-backed securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Residential

 
(22
)
 

 

 
(22
)
Commercial

 
(5
)
 

 

 
(5
)
Total mortgage-backed securities

 
(27
)
 

 

 
(27
)
Corporate debt securities
60

 

 

 

 
60

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations
44

 
(3
)
 

 
(88
)
 
(47
)
Asset-backed securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Auto loans and leases

 

 

 

 

Home equity loans

 

 

 

 

Other asset-backed securities

 
(1
)
 
59

 
(214
)
 
(156
)
Total asset-backed securities

 
(1
)
 
59

 
(214
)
 
(156
)
Total debt securities
104

 
(51
)
 
114

 
(578
)
 
(411
)
Marketable equity securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Perpetual preferred securities

 

 

 
(24
)
 
(24
)
Total marketable equity securities

 

 

 
(24
)
 
(24
)
Total available-for-sale securities
104

 
(51
)
 
114

 
(602
)
 
(435
)
Mortgages held for sale
53

 
(291
)
 
120

 
(110
)
 
(228
)
Loans
66

 

 
95

 
(213
)
 
(52
)
Mortgage servicing rights (residential)

 
(1
)
 
308

 

 
307

Net derivative assets and liabilities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Interest rate contracts

 

 

 
(337
)
 
(337
)
Commodity contracts

 

 

 

 

Equity contracts

 
(32
)
 

 
(19
)
 
(51
)
Foreign exchange contracts

 

 

 

 

Credit contracts
2

 

 

 
35

 
37

Other derivative contracts

 

 

 

 

Total derivative contracts
2

 
(32
)
 

 
(321
)
 
(351
)
Other assets

 

 

 
(3
)
 
(3
)
Short sale liabilities
6

 
(15
)
 

 

 
(9
)
Other liabilities (excluding derivatives)

 

 

 

 



129


The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, are summarized as follows:
  
Balance,
beginning
of period

 
Total net gains
(losses) included in
 
 
Purchases,
sales,
issuances
and
settlements,
net (1)

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
Net unrealized
gains (losses)
included in
income related
to assets and
liabilities held
at period end

  
(in millions)
 
Net
income 

 
Other
compre-
hensive
income

 
 
Transfers
into
Level 3

 
Transfers
out of
Level 3

 
Balance,
end of
period

 
(2)
Quarter ended March 31, 2014
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
  
Trading assets (excluding derivatives):
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
  
Securities of U.S. states and
political subdivisions
$
39

 

 

 
1

 

 

 
40

 

  
Collateralized loan and other
debt obligations
541

 
11

 

 
52

 
4

 

 
608

 
(10
)
  
Corporate debt securities
53

 
1

 

 
9

 
24

 
(1
)
 
86

 

  
Mortgage-backed securities
1

 

 

 

 

 

 
1

 

  
Asset-backed securities
122

 
14

 

 
(38
)
 

 
(1
)
 
97

 
14

  
Equity securities
13

 

 

 

 

 

 
13

 

  
Total trading securities
769


26




24


28


(2
)

845


4

  
Other trading assets
54

 
(2
)
 

 

 

 

 
52

 
1

  
Total trading assets
(excluding derivatives)
823


24




24


28


(2
)

897


5

(3)
Available-for-sale securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
  
Securities of U.S. states and
political subdivisions
3,214

 
9

 
2

 
(132
)
 
6

 

 
3,099

 

  
Mortgage-backed securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 


 
  
  
Residential
64

 
10

 
(3
)
 
(30
)
 

 

 
41

 

  
Commercial
138

 
1

 
11

 
(9
)
 

 

 
141

 
(2
)
  
Total mortgage-backed securities
202


11


8


(39
)





182


(2
)
  
Corporate debt securities
281

 
4

 
7

 
5

 

 

 
297

 

  
Collateralized loan and other
debt obligations
1,420

 
43

 
(13
)
 
(30
)
 

 

 
1,420

 

  
Asset-backed securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
 


 
  
  
Auto loans and leases
492

 

 
(3
)
 
(215
)
 

 

 
274

 

  
Home equity loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
Other asset-backed securities
1,657

 
1

 
(4
)
 
(463
)
 
89

 

 
1,280

 

  
Total asset-backed securities
2,149


1


(7
)

(678
)

89




1,554



  
Total debt securities
7,266


68


(3
)

(874
)

95




6,552


(2
)
(4)
Marketable equity securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
  
Perpetual preferred securities
729

 
3

 
(4
)
 
(20
)
 

 

 
708

 

  
Total marketable equity securities
729


3


(4
)

(20
)





708



(5)
Total available-for-sale
securities
7,995


71


(7
)

(894
)

95




7,260


(2
)
  
Mortgages held for sale
2,374

 
2

 

 
(46
)
 
57

 
(24
)
 
2,363

 
2

(6)
Loans
5,723

 
2

 

 
13

 

 
(49
)
 
5,689

 
4

(6)
Mortgage servicing rights (residential) (7)
15,580

 
(916
)
 

 
289

 

 

 
14,953

 
(441
)
(6)
Net derivative assets and liabilities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 


 
  
  
Interest rate contracts
(40
)
 
362

 

 
(264
)
 

 

 
58

 
77

  
Commodity contracts
(10
)
 
(31
)
 

 
1

 
(3
)
 

 
(43
)
 
(39
)
  
Equity contracts
(46
)
 
22

 

 
39

 
6

 
(45
)
 
(24
)
 
(36
)
  
Foreign exchange contracts
9

 
2

 

 
(5
)
 

 

 
6

 
(2
)
  
Credit contracts
(375
)
 
11

 

 
96

 

 

 
(268
)
 
1

  
Other derivative contracts
(3
)
 
(8
)
 

 

 

 

 
(11
)
 

  
Total derivative contracts
(465
)

358




(133
)

3


(45
)

(282
)

1

(8)
Other assets
1,503

 
(63
)
 

 
600

 

 

 
2,040

 
(4
)
(3)
Short sale liabilities

 

 

 
(5
)
 

 

 
(5
)
 

(3)
Other liabilities (excluding derivatives)
(39
)
 

 

 
2

 

 

 
(37
)
 

(6)
(1)
See next page for detail.
(2)
Represents only net gains (losses) that are due to changes in economic conditions and management’s estimates of fair value and excludes changes due to the collection/realization of cash flows over time.
(3)
Included in net gains (losses) from trading activities and other noninterest income in the income statement.
(4)
Included in net gains (losses) from debt securities in the income statement.
(5)
Included in net gains (losses) from equity investments in the income statement.
(6)
Included in mortgage banking and other noninterest income in the income statement.
(7)
For more information on the changes in mortgage servicing rights, see Note 8 (Mortgage Banking Activities).
(8)
Included in mortgage banking, trading activities, equity investments and other noninterest income in the income statement.
 
(continued on following page)






130

Note 13: Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (continued)

(continued from previous page)
 
The following table presents gross purchases, sales, issuances and settlements related to the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the quarter ended March 31, 2014.
(in millions)
Purchases

 
Sales

 
Issuances

 
Settlements

 
Net

Quarter ended March 31, 2014
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Trading assets (excluding derivatives):
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
$
5

 
(4
)
 

 

 
1

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations
324

 
(270
)
 

 
(2
)
 
52

Corporate debt securities
15

 
(6
)
 

 

 
9

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

Asset-backed securities
10

 
(38
)
 

 
(10
)
 
(38
)
Equity securities

 

 

 

 

Total trading securities
354

 
(318
)
 

 
(12
)
 
24

Other trading assets

 

 

 

 

Total trading assets (excluding derivatives)
354

 
(318
)
 

 
(12
)
 
24

Available-for-sale securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
73

 
(55
)
 
11

 
(161
)
 
(132
)
Mortgage-backed securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 

Residential

 
(28
)
 

 
(2
)
 
(30
)
Commercial

 
(8
)
 

 
(1
)
 
(9
)
Total mortgage-backed securities

 
(36
)
 

 
(3
)
 
(39
)
Corporate debt securities

 
(1
)
 
11

 
(5
)
 
5

Collateralized loan and other debt obligations
124

 
(32
)
 

 
(122
)
 
(30
)
Asset-backed securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 


Auto loans and leases

 

 

 
(215
)
 
(215
)
Home equity loans

 

 

 

 

Other asset-backed securities
12

 
(12
)
 
64

 
(527
)
 
(463
)
Total asset-backed securities
12


(12
)

64


(742
)

(678
)
Total debt securities
209


(136
)

86


(1,033
)

(874
)
Marketable equity securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Perpetual preferred securities

 

 

 
(20
)
 
(20
)
Total marketable equity securities






(20
)

(20
)
Total available-for-sale securities
209


(136
)

86


(1,053
)

(894
)
Mortgages held for sale
47

 
(21
)
 

 
(72
)
 
(46
)
Loans
1

 

 
102

 
(90
)
 
13

Mortgage servicing rights (residential)

 

 
289

 

 
289

Net derivative assets and liabilities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 


Interest rate contracts

 

 

 
(264
)
 
(264
)
Commodity contracts

 

 

 
1

 
1

Equity contracts

 
(58
)
 

 
97

 
39

Foreign exchange contracts

 

 

 
(5
)
 
(5
)
Credit contracts

 

 

 
96

 
96

Other derivative contracts

 

 

 

 

Total derivative contracts


(58
)



(75
)

(133
)
Other assets
608

 

 

 
(8
)
 
600

Short sale liabilities
(5
)
 

 

 

 
(5
)
Other liabilities (excluding derivatives)

 

 

 
2

 
2


The following table provides quantitative information about the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of substantially all of our Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for which we use an internal model.
The significant unobservable inputs for Level 3 assets and liabilities that are valued using fair values obtained from third party vendors are not included in the table, as the specific inputs applied are not provided by the vendor. In addition, the table excludes the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs for certain classes of Level 3 assets and liabilities measured using an internal model that we consider, both individually and in the aggregate, insignificant relative to our overall Level 3 assets and liabilities. We made this determination based upon an evaluation of each class, which considered the
 
magnitude of the positions, nature of the unobservable inputs and potential for significant changes in fair value due to changes in those inputs. For information on how changes in significant unobservable inputs affect the fair values of Level 3 assets and liabilities, see Note 17 (Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K. 


131


($ in millions, except cost to service amounts)
Fair Value
Level 3

  
Valuation Technique(s)
 
Significant
Unobservable Input
 
Range of
Inputs 
 
Weighted
Average (1)
 
March 31, 2015
  
  
  
 
  
 
  

  
  

  
 
  

Trading and available-for-sale securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities of U.S. states and
political subdivisions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Government, healthcare and
other revenue bonds
$
1,634

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
0.5

-
5.8

%
 
1.7

 
59

 
Vendor priced
 
 
 
  

 
  

 
 
  

Auction rate securities and other
municipal bonds
293

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
2.0

-
7.6

 
 
4.0

 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average life
 
1.8

-
19.3

yrs
 
7.6

Collateralized loan and other debt
obligations (2)
462

 
Market comparable pricing
 
Comparability adjustment
 
(53.3
)
-
18.7

%
 
2.8

 
972

 
Vendor priced
 
 
 
  

 
  

 
 
  

Asset-backed securities:
  
 
 
 
 
 
  

 
  

 
 
  

Auto loans and leases
249

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
(0.3
)
-
(0.3
)
 
 
(0.3
)
Other asset-backed securities:
  
 
 
 
 
 
  

 
  

 
 
  

Diversified payment rights (3)
617

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
1.0

-
6.4

 
 
2.8

Other commercial and consumer
632

(4)
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
1.8

-
16.3

 
 
5.6

 
  
 
 
 
Weighted average life
 
1.5

-
9.6

yrs
 
4.7

 
38

 
Vendor priced
 
 
 
  

 
  

 
 
  

Marketable equity securities:
perpetual preferred
640

(5)
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
4.0

-
9.0

 
6.3

 
  
 
 
 
Weighted average life
 
1.0

-
11.6

yrs
 
9.7

Mortgages held for sale (residential)
2,024

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Default rate
 
0.6

-
15.0

%
 
2.4

 
  
 
 
 
Discount rate
 
1.1

-
6.2

 
 
5.0

 
  
 
 
 
Loss severity
 
0.1

-
26.5

 
 
18.1

 
  
 
 
 
Prepayment rate
 
2.0

-
18.6

 
 
9.8

 
74

 
Market comparable pricing
 
Comparability adjustment
 
(93.2
)
-
9.6

 
 
(31.2
)
Loans
5,730

(6)
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
0.0

-
3.6

 
 
3.0

 
  
 
 
 
Prepayment rate
 
0.4

-
100.0

 
 
12.2

 
  
 
 
 
Utilization rate
 
0.0

-
1.0

 
 
0.4

Mortgage servicing rights (residential)
11,739

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Cost to service per loan (7)
 
$
86

-
662

 
 
174

 
  
 
 
 
Discount rate
 
5.3

-
17.4

%
 
7.4

 
  
 
 
 
Prepayment rate (8)
 
8.3

-
24.6

 
 
13.2

Net derivative assets and (liabilities):
  
 
 
 
 
 
  

 
  

 
 
  

Interest rate contracts
238

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Default rate
 
0.00

-
0.05

 
 
0.02

 
  
 
 
 
Loss severity
 
50.0

-
50.0

 
 
50.0

Interest rate contracts: derivative loan
commitments
200

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Fall-out factor
 
1.0

-
99.0

 
 
24.2

 
  
 
 
 
Initial-value servicing
 
(30.3
)
-
110.7

bps
 
44.8

Equity contracts
110

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Conversion factor
 
(11.2
)
-
0.0

%
 
(7.6
)
 
  
 
 
 
Weighted average life
 
0.8

-
2.8

yrs
 
1.1

 
(296
)
 
Option model
 
Correlation factor
 
(50.0
)
-
96.9

%
 
59.0

 
  
 
 
 
Volatility factor
 
8.3

-
100.0

 
 
28.1

Credit contracts
(157
)
 
Market comparable pricing
 
Comparability adjustment
 
(28.7
)
-
34.6

 
 
1.7

 
3

 
Option model
 
Credit spread
 
0.0

-
15.2

 
 
0.8

 
  
 
 
 
Loss severity
 
11.5

-
72.5

 
 
50.1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other assets: nonmarketable equity investments
2,549

 
Market comparable pricing
 
Comparability adjustment
 
(22.0
)
-
(4.8
)
 
 
(13.3
)
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Insignificant Level 3 assets, net of liabilities
504

(9)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total level 3 assets, net of liabilities
$
28,314

(10)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Weighted averages are calculated using outstanding unpaid principal balance for cash instruments such as loans and securities, and notional amounts for derivative instruments.
(2)
Includes $487 million of collateralized debt obligations.
(3)
Securities backed by specified sources of current and future receivables generated from foreign originators.
(4)
Consists primarily of investments in asset-backed securities that are revolving in nature, in which the timing of advances and repayments of principal are uncertain.
(5)
Consists of auction rate preferred equity securities with no maturity date that are callable by the issuer.
(6)
Consists predominantly of reverse mortgage loans securitized with GNMA that were accounted for as secured borrowing transactions.
(7)
The high end of the range of inputs is for servicing modified loans. For non-modified loans the range is $86 - $302.
(8)
Includes a blend of prepayment speeds and expected defaults. Prepayment speeds are influenced by mortgage interest rates as well as our estimation of drivers of borrower behavior.
(9)
Represents the aggregate amount of Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis that are individually and in the aggregate insignificant. The amount includes corporate debt securities, mortgage-backed securities, other marketable equity securities, certain other assets, other liabilities and certain net derivative assets and liabilities, such as commodity contracts, foreign exchange contracts and other derivative contracts.
(10)
Consists of total Level 3 assets of $30.4 billion and total Level 3 liabilities of $2.1 billion, before netting of derivative balances.

132

Note 13: Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (continued)

($ in millions, except cost to service amounts)  
Fair Value
Level 3

  
Valuation Technique(s)
 
Significant
Unobservable Input
 
Range of
Inputs 
Weighted   
Average (1)
 
December 31, 2014
  
  
  
 
  
 
  

  
  

  
 
 

Trading and available-for-sale securities:
  
  
  
 
  
 
  

  
  

  
 
 

Securities of U.S. states and
political subdivisions:
  
  
  
 
  
 
  

  
  

  
 
 

Government, healthcare and
other revenue bonds
$
1,900

  
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
0.4

-
5.6

%
 
1.5

 
61

  
Vendor priced
 
  
 
  

  
  

  
 
  

Auction rate securities and other
municipal bonds
323

  
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
1.5

-
7.6

  
 
3.9

 
  
  
  
 
Weighted average life
 
1.3

-
19.4

yrs
 
6.4

Collateralized loan and other debt
obligations (2)
565

  
Market comparable pricing
 
Comparability adjustment
 
(53.9
)
-
25.0

%
 
0.9

 
967

  
Vendor priced
 
  
 
  

  
  

  
 
  

Asset-backed securities:
  
  
  
 
  
 
  

  
  

  
 
  

Auto loans and leases
245

  
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
0.4

-
0.4

  
 
0.4

Other asset-backed securities:
  
  
  
 
  
 
  

  
  

  
 
 

Diversified payment rights (3)
661

  
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
0.9

-
7.1

 
 
2.9

Other commercial and consumer
750

(4)
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
1.9

-
21.5

  
 
5.0

 
  
  
  
 
Weighted average life
 
1.6

-
10.7

yrs
 
4.0

 
40

  
Vendor priced
 
  
 
  

  
  

  
 
  

Marketable equity securities:
perpetual preferred
663

(5)
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
4.1

-
9.3

 
6.6

  
  
  
  
 
Weighted average life
 
1.0

-
11.8

yrs
 
9.7

Mortgages held for sale (residential)
2,235

  
Discounted cash flow
 
Default rate
 
0.4

-
15.0

%
 
2.6

  
  
  
  
 
Discount rate
 
1.1

-
7.7

  
 
5.2

  
  
  
  
 
Loss severity
 
0.1

-
26.4

  
 
18.3

  
  
  
  
 
Prepayment rate
 
2.0

-
15.5

  
 
8.1

 
78

 
Market comparable pricing
 
Comparability adjustment
 
(93.0
)
-
10.0

 
 
(30.0
)
Loans
5,788

(6)
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
0.0

-
3.8

  
 
3.1

 
  
  
  
 
Prepayment rate
 
0.6

-
100.0

  
 
11.2

 
  
  
  
 
Utilization rate
 
0.0

-
1.0

  
 
0.4

Mortgage servicing rights (residential)
12,738

  
Discounted cash flow
 
Cost to service per
loan (7)
 
$
86

-
683

  
 
179

 
  
  
  
 
Discount rate
 
5.9

-
16.9

%
 
7.6

 
  
  
  
 
Prepayment rate (8)
 
8.0

-
22.0

  
 
12.5

Net derivative assets and (liabilities):
  
  
  
 
  
 
  

  
  

  
 
  

Interest rate contracts
196

  
Discounted cash flow
 
Default rate
 
0.00

-
0.02

  
 
0.01

  
  
  
  
 
Loss severity
 
50.0

-
50.0

  
 
50.0

Interest rate contracts: derivative loan
commitments
97

  
Discounted cash flow
 
Fall-out factor
 
1.0

-
99.0

  
 
24.5

 
  
  
  
 
Initial-value servicing
 
(31.1
)
-
113.3

bps
 
46.5

Equity contracts
162

  
Discounted cash flow
 
Conversion factor
 
(11.2
)
-
0.0

%
 
(8.4
)
 
  
  
  
 
Weighted average life
 
1.0

-
2.0

yrs
 
1.3

 
(246
)
  
Option model
 
Correlation factor
 
(56.0
)
-
96.3

%
 
42.1

 
  
  
  
 
Volatility factor
 
8.3

-
80.9

  
 
28.3

Credit contracts
(192
)
  
Market comparable pricing
 
Comparability adjustment
 
(28.6
)
-
26.3

  
 
1.8

 
3

  
Option model
 
Credit spread
 
0.0

-
17.0

  
 
0.9

 
  
  
  
 
Loss severity
 
11.5

-
72.5

  
 
48.7

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other assets: nonmarketable equity investments
2,512

  
Market comparable pricing
 
Comparability adjustment
 
(19.7
)
-
(4.0
)
  
 
(14.7
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Insignificant Level 3 assets, net of liabilities
507

(9)
  
 
  
 
  

  
  

  
 
 

Total level 3 assets, net of liabilities
$
30,054

(10)
  
 
  
 
  

  
  

  
 
 

(1)
Weighted averages are calculated using outstanding unpaid principal balance for cash instruments such as loans and securities, and notional amounts for derivative instruments.
(2)
Includes $500 million of collateralized debt obligations.
(3)
Securities backed by specified sources of current and future receivables generated from foreign originators.
(4)
Consists primarily of investments in asset-backed securities that are revolving in nature, in which the timing of advances and repayments of principal are uncertain.
(5)
Consists of auction rate preferred equity securities with no maturity date that are callable by the issuer.
(6)
Consists predominantly of reverse mortgage loans securitized with GNMA that were accounted for as secured borrowing transactions.
(7)
The high end of the range of inputs is for servicing modified loans. For non-modified loans the range is $86 - $270.
(8)
Includes a blend of prepayment speeds and expected defaults. Prepayment speeds are influenced by mortgage interest rates as well as our estimation of drivers of borrower behavior.
(9)
Represents the aggregate amount of Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis that are individually and in the aggregate insignificant. The amount includes corporate debt securities, mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities backed by home equity loans, other marketable equity securities, certain other assets, other liabilities and certain net derivative assets and liabilities, such as commodity contracts, foreign exchange contracts and other derivative contracts. 
(10)
Consists of total Level 3 assets of $32.3 billion and total Level 3 liabilities of $2.3 billion, before netting of derivative balances.



133


The valuation techniques used for our Level 3 assets and liabilities, as presented in the previous tables, are described as follows: 
Discounted cash flow - Discounted cash flow valuation techniques generally consist of developing an estimate of future cash flows that are expected to occur over the life of an instrument and then discounting those cash flows at a rate of return that results in the fair value amount.
Market comparable pricing - Market comparable pricing valuation techniques are used to determine the fair value of certain instruments by incorporating known inputs, such as recent transaction prices, pending transactions, or prices of other similar investments that require significant adjustment to reflect differences in instrument characteristics.
Option model - Option model valuation techniques are generally used for instruments in which the holder has a contingent right or obligation based on the occurrence of a future event, such as the price of a referenced asset going above or below a predetermined strike price. Option models estimate the likelihood of the specified event occurring by incorporating assumptions such as volatility estimates, price of the underlying instrument and expected rate of return.

Vendor-priced  – Prices obtained from third party pricing vendors or brokers that are used to record the fair value of the asset or liability, of which the related valuation technique and significant unobservable inputs are not provided.
 
Significant unobservable inputs presented in the previous table are those we consider significant to the fair value of the Level 3 asset or liability. We consider unobservable inputs to be significant, if by their exclusion, the fair value of the Level 3 asset or liability would be impacted by a predetermined percentage change or based on qualitative factors, such as nature of the instrument, type of valuation technique used, and the significance of the unobservable inputs relative to other inputs used within the valuation. Following is a description of the significant unobservable inputs provided in the table.
 
Comparability adjustment – is an adjustment made to observed market data, such as a transaction price in order to reflect dissimilarities in underlying collateral, issuer, rating, or other factors used within a market valuation approach, expressed as a percentage of an observed price.
Conversion Factor – is the risk-adjusted rate in which a particular instrument may be exchanged for another instrument upon settlement, expressed as a percentage change from a specified rate.
Correlation factor - is the likelihood of one instrument changing in price relative to another based on an established relationship expressed as a percentage of relative change in price over a period over time.

 
Cost to service - is the expected cost per loan of servicing a portfolio of loans, which includes estimates for unreimbursed expenses (including delinquency and foreclosure costs) that may occur as a result of servicing such loan portfolios.
Credit spread – is the portion of the interest rate in excess of a benchmark interest rate, such as OIS, LIBOR or U.S. Treasury rates, that when applied to an investment captures changes in the obligor’s creditworthiness.
Default rate – is an estimate of the likelihood of not collecting contractual amounts owed expressed as a constant default rate (CDR).
Discount rate – is a rate of return used to present value the future expected cash flow to arrive at the fair value of an instrument. The discount rate consists of a benchmark rate component and a risk premium component. The benchmark rate component, for example, OIS, LIBOR or U.S. Treasury rates, is generally observable within the market and is necessary to appropriately reflect the time value of money. The risk premium component reflects the amount of compensation market participants require due to the uncertainty inherent in the instruments’ cash flows resulting from risks such as credit and liquidity.
Fall-out factor - is the expected percentage of loans associated with our interest rate lock commitment portfolio that are likely of not funding.
Initial-value servicing - is the estimated value of the underlying loan, including the value attributable to the embedded servicing right, expressed in basis points of outstanding unpaid principal balance.
Loss severity – is the percentage of contractual cash flows lost in the event of a default.
Prepayment rate – is the estimated rate at which forecasted prepayments of principal of the related loan or debt instrument are expected to occur, expressed as a constant prepayment rate (CPR).
Utilization rate – is the estimated rate in which incremental portions of existing reverse mortgage credit lines are expected to be drawn by borrowers, expressed as an annualized rate.
Volatility factor – is the extent of change in price an item is estimated to fluctuate over a specified period of time expressed as a percentage of relative change in price over a period over time.
Weighted average life – is the weighted average number of years an investment is expected to remain outstanding based on its expected cash flows reflecting the estimated date the issuer will call or extend the maturity of the instrument or otherwise reflecting an estimate of the timing of an instrument’s cash flows whose timing is not contractually fixed.


134

Note 13: Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (continued)

Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
We may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually result from application of
 
LOCOM accounting or write-downs of individual assets. The following table provides the fair value hierarchy and carrying amount of all assets that were still held as of March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, and for which a nonrecurring fair value adjustment was recorded during the periods presented.

  
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
(in millions)
Level 1

 
Level 2

 
Level 3

 
Total

 
Level 1

 
Level 2

 
Level 3

 
Total

Mortgages held for sale (LOCOM) (1)
$

 
2,070

 
986

 
3,056

 

 
2,197

 
1,098

 
3,295

Loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
Commercial

 
115

 

 
115

 

 
243

 

 
243

Consumer

 
537

 
7

 
544

 

 
2,018

 
5

 
2,023

Total loans (2)

 
652

 
7

 
659

 

 
2,261

 
5

 
2,266

Other assets (3)

 
186

 
113

 
299

 

 
417

 
460

 
877

(1)
Mostly real estate 1-4 family first mortgage loans.
(2)
Represents carrying value of loans for which adjustments are based on the appraised value of the collateral.
(3)
Includes the fair value of foreclosed real estate, other collateral owned and nonmarketable equity investments.
 
The following table presents the increase (decrease) in value of certain assets for which a nonrecurring fair value adjustment has been recognized during the periods presented.
 
  
Quarter ended Mar 31,
 
(in millions)
2015

 
2014

Mortgages held for sale (LOCOM)
$
31

 
46

Loans:
 
 
  
Commercial
(35
)
 
(36
)
Consumer
(341
)
 
(468
)
Total loans (1)
(376
)
 
(504
)
Other assets (2)
(61
)
 

Total
$
(406
)
 
(458
)
(1)
Represents write-downs of loans based on the appraised value of the collateral.
(2)
Includes the losses on foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned that were measured at fair value subsequent to their initial classification as foreclosed assets. Also includes impairment losses on nonmarketable equity investments. 


135


The table below provides quantitative information about the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of substantially all of our Level 3 assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis using an internal model. The table is limited to financial instruments that had nonrecurring fair value adjustments during the periods presented.

 
We have excluded from the table classes of Level 3 assets and liabilities measured using an internal model that we consider, both individually and in the aggregate, insignificant relative to our overall Level 3 nonrecurring measurements. We made this determination based upon an evaluation of each class which considered the magnitude of the positions, nature of the unobservable inputs and potential for significant changes in fair value due to changes in those inputs.

 
($ in millions)
Fair Value
Level 3

  
Valuation Technique(s) (1)
 
Significant
Unobservable Inputs (1)
  
Range of inputs
 
Weighted
Average (2)

March 31, 2015
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
Residential mortgages held for sale (LOCOM)
$
986

(3)
Discounted cash flow
 
Default rate
(5)
0.2
3.7
%
 
2.6
%
  
  
  
  
 
Discount rate
  
1.5
8.5

 
3.5

  
  
  
  
 
Loss severity
  
1.2
37.8

 
3.8

  
  
  
  
 
Prepayment rate
(6)
2.0
100.0

 
59.6

Insignificant level 3 assets
120

  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
Total
$
1,106

  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
December 31, 2014
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
Residential mortgages held for sale (LOCOM)
$
1,098

(3)
Discounted cash flow
 
Default rate
(5)
0.9
3.8
%
 
2.1
%
  
  
  
  
 
Discount rate
  
1.5
8.5

 
3.6

  
  
  
  
 
Loss severity
  
0.0
29.8

 
3.8

  
  
  
  
 
Prepayment rate
(6)
2.0
100.0

 
65.5

Other assets: private equity fund investments (4)
171

  
Market comparable pricing
 
Comparability adjustment
  
6.0
6.0

 
6.0

Insignificant level 3 assets
294

  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
Total
$
1,563

  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
(1)
Refer to the narrative following the recurring quantitative Level 3 table of this Note for a definition of the valuation technique(s) and significant unobservable inputs.
(2)
For residential MHFS, weighted averages are calculated using outstanding unpaid principal balance of the loans.
(3)
Consists of approximately $926 million and $1.0 billion government insured/guaranteed loans purchased from GNMA-guaranteed mortgage securitizations, at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively and $60 million and $78 million of other mortgage loans which are not government insured/guaranteed at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
(4)
Represents a single investment. For additional information, see the “Alternative Investments” section in this Note.
(5)
Applies only to non-government insured/guaranteed loans.
(6)
Includes the impact on prepayment rate of expected defaults for the government insured/guaranteed loans, which affects the frequency and timing of early resolution of loans.


136

Note 13: Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (continued)

Alternative Investments
The following table summarizes our investments in various types of funds for which we use net asset values (NAVs) per share as a practical expedient to measure fair value on recurring and nonrecurring bases. The investments are included in trading
 
assets, available-for-sale securities, and other assets. The table excludes those investments that are probable of being sold at an amount different from the funds’ NAVs.
 

(in millions)
Fair
value

 
Unfunded
commitments

 
Redemption
frequency
 
Redemption
notice
period
March 31, 2015
  

 
  

 
  
 
  
Offshore funds
$
60

 

 
Daily - Quarterly
 
1 - 60 days
Hedge funds
1

 

 
Daily - Quarterly
 
1-90 days
Private equity funds (1)(2)
1,235

 
236

 
N/A
 
N/A
Venture capital funds (2)
68

 
9

 
N/A
 
N/A
Total (3)
$
1,364

 
245

 
  
 
  
December 31, 2014
  

 
  

 
  
 
  
Offshore funds
$
125

 

 
Daily - Quarterly
 
1 - 60 days
Hedge funds
1

 

 
Daily - Quarterly
 
1-90 days
Private equity funds (1)(2)
1,313

 
243

 
N/A
 
N/A
Venture capital funds (2)
68

 
9

 
N/A
 
N/A
Total (3)
$
1,507

 
252

 
  
 
  
N/A - Not applicable
(1)
Excludes a private equity fund investment of $172 million and $171 million at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively. This investment was sold in April 2015 for an amount different from the fund’s NAV.
(2)
Includes certain investments subject to the Volcker Rule that we may have to divest.
(3)
March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, each include $1.3 billion of fair value for nonmarketable equity investments carried at cost for which we use NAVs as a practical expedient to determine nonrecurring fair value adjustments. The fair values of investments that had nonrecurring fair value adjustments were $75 million and $108 million at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively.
 
Offshore funds primarily invest in foreign mutual funds. Redemption restrictions are in place for these investments with a fair value of $24 million at both March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, due to lock-up provisions that will remain in effect until February 2016.
Private equity funds invest in equity and debt securities issued by private and publicly-held companies in connection with leveraged buyouts, recapitalizations and expansion opportunities. These investments do not allow redemptions. Alternatively, we receive distributions as the underlying assets of the funds liquidate, which we expect to occur over the next 6 years.
Venture capital funds invest in domestic and foreign companies in a variety of industries, including information technology, financial services and healthcare. These investments can never be redeemed with the funds. Instead, we receive distributions as the underlying assets of the fund liquidate, which we expect to occur over the next 5 years.
 



137


Fair Value Option
The fair value option is an irrevocable election, generally only permitted upon initial recognition of financial assets or liabilities, to measure eligible financial instruments at fair value with changes in fair value reflected in earnings. We may elect the fair value option to align the measurement model with how the financial assets or liabilities are managed or to reduce complexity or accounting asymmetry. For more information, including the basis for our fair value option elections, see Note 17 (Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K.
 

The following table reflects differences between the fair value carrying amount of certain assets and liabilities for which we have elected the fair value option and the contractual aggregate unpaid principal amount at maturity.

 

  
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
(in millions)
Fair value
carrying
amount

 
Aggregate
unpaid
principal

 
Fair value
carrying
amount
less
aggregate
unpaid
principal

 
Fair value
carrying
amount

 
Aggregate
unpaid
principal

 
Fair value
carrying
amount
less
aggregate
unpaid
principal

Trading assets - loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     Total loans
$
1,110

 
1,132

 
(22
)
 
1,387

 
1,410

 
(23
)
     Nonaccrual loans

 

 

 

 
1

 
(1
)
Mortgages held for sale:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Total loans
19,015

 
18,551

 
464

 
15,565

 
15,246

 
319

Nonaccrual loans
129

 
213

 
(84
)
 
160

 
252

 
(92
)
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing
26

 
29

 
(3
)
 
27

 
30

 
(3
)
Loans held for sale:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Total loans
1

 
10

 
(9
)
 
1

 
10

 
(9
)
Nonaccrual loans
1

 
10

 
(9
)
 
1

 
10

 
(9
)
Loans:
  
 
  
 
  

 
  
 
  
 
  
Total loans
5,730

 
5,475

 
255

 
5,788

 
5,527

 
261

Nonaccrual loans
431

 
442

 
(11
)
 
367

 
376

 
(9
)
Other assets (1)
2,549

 
n/a

 
n/a

 
2,512

 
n/a

 
n/a

(1)
Consists of nonmarketable equity investments carried at fair value. See Note 6 (Other Assets) for more information.


138

Note 13: Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (continued)

The assets and liabilities accounted for under the fair value option are initially measured at fair value. Gains and losses from initial measurement and subsequent changes in fair value are recognized in earnings. The changes in fair value related to initial
 
measurement and subsequent changes in fair value included in earnings for these assets and liabilities measured at fair value are shown below by income statement line item.

  
2015
 
 
2014
 
(in millions)
Mortgage banking noninterest income

 
Net gains
(losses)
from
trading
activities

 
Other
noninterest
income

 
Mortgage
banking
noninterest
income

 
Net gains
(losses)
from
trading
activities

 
Other
noninterest
income

Quarter ended March 31,
 
 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

Trading assets - loans
$

 
15

 
1

 

 
12

 

Mortgages held for sale
581

 

 

 
506

 

 

Loans

 

 
(4
)
 

 

 

Other assets

 

 
38

 

 

 
(61
)
Other interests held (1)

 

 

 

 
(1
)
 
(1
)
(1)
Consists of retained interests in securitizations and changes in fair value of letters of credit.

For performing loans, instrument-specific credit risk gains or losses were derived principally by determining the change in fair value of the loans due to changes in the observable or implied credit spread. Credit spread is the market yield on the loans less the relevant risk-free benchmark interest rate. For
 
nonperforming loans, we attribute all changes in fair value to instrument-specific credit risk. The following table shows the estimated gains and losses from earnings attributable to instrument-specific credit risk related to assets accounted for under the fair value option.

  
Quarter ended March 31,
 
 
(in millions)
2015

 
2014

 
Gains (losses) attributable to instrument-specific credit risk:
  

 
  

 
Trading assets - loans
$
15

 
12

 
Mortgages held for sale
17

 
10

 
Total
$
32

 
22

 


139


Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The table below is a summary of fair value estimates for financial instruments, excluding financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, which are included within the Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis table included earlier in this Note. The carrying amounts in the following table are recorded on the balance sheet under the indicated captions, except for nonmarketable equity investments, which are included in Other Assets.
 
We have not included assets and liabilities that are not financial instruments in our disclosure, such as the value of the long-term relationships with our deposit, credit card and trust customers, amortized MSRs, premises and equipment, goodwill and other intangibles, deferred taxes and other liabilities. The total of the fair value calculations presented does not represent, and should not be construed to represent, the underlying value of the Company.
 

  
  

 
Estimated fair value
 
(in millions)
Carrying amount

 
Level 1

 
Level 2

 
Level 3

 
Total

March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and due from banks (1)
$
19,793

 
19,793

 

 

 
19,793

Federal funds sold, securities purchased under resale agreements and other short-term investments (1)
291,317

 
7,100

 
284,217

 

 
291,317

Held-to-maturity securities
67,133

 
45,676

 
17,996

 
5,109

 
68,781

Mortgages held for sale (2)
4,591

 

 
3,608

 
986

 
4,594

Loans held for sale (2)
680

 

 
697

 

 
697

Loans, net (3)
831,427

 

 
60,086

 
784,517

 
844,603

Nonmarketable equity investments (cost method)
6,912

 

 

 
8,599

 
8,599

Financial liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits
1,196,663

 

 
1,163,086

 
33,653

 
1,196,739

Short-term borrowings (1)
77,697

 

 
77,697

 

 
77,697

Long-term debt (4)
183,283

 

 
175,239

 
9,787

 
185,026

December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and due from banks (1)
$
19,571

 
19,571

 

 

 
19,571

Federal funds sold, securities purchased under resale agreements and other short-term investments (1)
258,429

 
8,991

 
249,438

 

 
258,429

Held-to-maturity securities
55,483

 
41,548

 
9,021

 
5,790

 
56,359

Mortgages held for sale (2)
3,971

 

 
2,875

 
1,098

 
3,973

Loans held for sale (2)
721

 

 
739

 

 
739

Loans, net (3)
832,671

 

 
60,052

 
784,786

 
844,838

Nonmarketable equity investments (cost method)
7,033

 

 

 
8,377

 
8,377

Financial liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits
1,168,310

 

 
1,132,845

 
35,566

 
1,168,411

Short-term borrowings (1)
63,518

 

 
63,518

 

 
63,518

Long-term debt (4)
183,934

 

 
174,996

 
10,479

 
185,475

(1)
Amounts consist of financial instruments in which carrying value approximates fair value.
(2)
Balance reflects MHFS and LHFS, as applicable, other than those MHFS and LHFS for which we elected the fair value option.
(3)
Loans exclude balances for which the fair value option was elected and also exclude lease financing with a carrying amount of $12.4 billion and $12.3 billion at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
(4)
The carrying amount and fair value exclude obligations under capital leases of $9 million at both March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
 
Loan commitments, standby letters of credit and commercial and similar letters of credit are not included in the table above. A reasonable estimate of the fair value of these instruments is the carrying value of deferred fees plus the related allowance, which totaled $940 million and $945 million at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
 




140


Note 14:  Preferred Stock
We are authorized to issue 20 million shares of preferred stock and 4 million shares of preference stock, both without par value. Preferred shares outstanding rank senior to common shares both as to dividends and liquidation preference but have no general voting rights. We have not issued any preference shares under
 
this authorization. If issued, preference shares would be limited to one vote per share. Our total authorized, issued and outstanding preferred stock is presented in the following two tables along with the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock.


  
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
  
Liquidation
preference
per share

 
Shares
authorized
and designated

 
Liquidation
preference
per share

 
Shares
authorized
and designated

DEP Shares
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

Dividend Equalization Preferred Shares (DEP)
$
10

 
97,000

 
$
10

 
97,000

Series G
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7.25% Class A Preferred Stock
15,000

 
50,000

 
15,000

 
50,000

Series H
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Floating Class A Preferred Stock
20,000

 
50,000

 
20,000

 
50,000

Series I
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Floating Class A Preferred Stock
100,000

 
25,010

 
100,000

 
25,010

Series J
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8.00% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock
1,000

 
2,300,000

 
1,000

 
2,300,000

Series K
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7.98% Fixed-to-Floating Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock
1,000

 
3,500,000

 
1,000

 
3,500,000

Series L
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7.50% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Convertible Class A Preferred Stock
1,000

 
4,025,000

 
1,000

 
4,025,000

Series N
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.20% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock
25,000

 
30,000

 
25,000

 
30,000

Series O
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.125% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock
25,000

 
27,600

 
25,000

 
27,600

Series P
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.25% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock
25,000

 
26,400

 
25,000

 
26,400

Series Q
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.85% Fixed-to-Floating Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock
25,000

 
69,000

 
25,000

 
69,000

Series R
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.625% Fixed-to-Floating Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock
25,000

 
34,500

 
25,000

 
34,500

Series S
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.900% Fixed-to-Floating Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock
25,000

 
80,000

 
25,000

 
80,000

Series T
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.00% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock
25,000

 
32,200

 
25,000

 
32,200

Series U
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.875% Fixed-to-Floating Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock
25,000

 
80,000

 

 

ESOP
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (1)

 
2,036,572

 

 
1,251,287

Total
 
 
12,463,282

 
 
 
11,597,997

(1)
See the ESOP Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock section of this Note for additional information about the liquidation preference for the ESOP Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock.

141


  
March 31, 2015
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
(in millions, except shares)
Shares
issued and
outstanding

 
Par
value

 
Carrying
value

 
Discount

 
Shares
issued and
outstanding

 
Par
value

 
Carrying
value

 
Discount

DEP Shares
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

Dividend Equalization Preferred Shares (DEP)
96,546

 
$

 

 

 
96,546

 
$

 

 

Series I (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Floating Class A Preferred Stock
25,010

 
2,501

 
2,501

 

 
25,010

 
2,501

 
2,501

 

Series J (1) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8.00% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock
2,150,375

 
2,150

 
1,995

 
155

 
2,150,375

 
2,150

 
1,995

 
155

Series K (1) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7.98% Fixed-to-Floating Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock
3,352,000

 
3,352

 
2,876

 
476

 
3,352,000

 
3,352

 
2,876

 
476

Series L (1) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7.50% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Convertible Class A Preferred Stock
3,968,000

 
3,968

 
3,200

 
768

 
3,968,000

 
3,968

 
3,200

 
768

Series N (1) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.20% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock
30,000

 
750

 
750

 

 
30,000

 
750

 
750

 

Series O (1) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.125% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock
26,000

 
650

 
650

 

 
26,000

 
650

 
650

 

Series P (1) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.25% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock
25,000

 
625

 
625

 

 
25,000

 
625

 
625

 

Series Q (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.85% Fixed-to-Floating Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock
69,000

 
1,725

 
1,725

 

 
69,000

 
1,725

 
1,725

 

Series R (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.625% Fixed-to-Floating Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock
33,600

 
840

 
840

 

 
33,600

 
840

 
840

 

Series S (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.900% Fixed-to-Floating Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock
80,000

 
2,000

 
2,000

 

 
80,000

 
2,000

 
2,000

 

Series T (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.000% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock
32,000

 
800

 
800

 

 
32,000

 
800

 
800

 

Series U (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.875% Fixed-to-Floating Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock
80,000

 
2,000

 
2,000

 

 

 

 

 

ESOP
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock
2,036,572

 
2,036

 
2,036

 

 
1,251,287

 
1,251

 
1,251

 

Total
12,004,103

 
$
23,397

 
21,998

 
1,399

 
11,138,818

 
$
20,612

 
19,213

 
1,399

(1)
Preferred shares qualify as Tier 1 capital.

In January 2015, we issued 2 million Depositary Shares, each representing a 1/25th interest in a share of Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock, Series U, for an aggregate public offering price of $2.0 billion.
See Note 7 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) for additional information on our trust preferred securities. We do not have a commitment to issue Series G or H preferred stock.


142

Note 14: Preferred Stock (continued)

ESOP Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock  All shares of our ESOP Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (ESOP Preferred Stock) were issued to a trustee acting on behalf of the Wells Fargo & Company 401(k) Plan (the 401(k) Plan). Dividends on the ESOP Preferred Stock are cumulative from the date of initial issuance and are payable quarterly at annual rates based upon the year of issuance. Each share of ESOP Preferred Stock released from the unallocated reserve of the 401(k) Plan is converted into shares of our common stock based on the stated value of the
 
ESOP Preferred Stock and the then current market price of our common stock. The ESOP Preferred Stock is also convertible at the option of the holder at any time, unless previously redeemed. We have the option to redeem the ESOP Preferred Stock at any time, in whole or in part, at a redemption price per share equal to the higher of (a) $1,000 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends or (b) the fair market value, as defined in the Certificates of Designation for the ESOP Preferred Stock.

  
Shares issued and outstanding
 
 
Carrying value
 
 
  
  
Mar. 31,

 
Dec. 31,

 
Mar. 31,

 
Dec. 31,

 
Adjustable dividend rate
(in millions, except shares)
2015

 
2014

 
2015

 
2014

 
Minimum

 
Maximum
ESOP Preferred Stock
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
$1,000 liquidation preference per share
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
2015
826,598

 

 
$
826

 

 
8.90
%
 
9.90
2014
320,019

 
352,158

 
320

 
352

 
8.70

 
9.70
2013
278,826

 
288,000

 
279

 
288

 
8.50

 
9.50
2012
189,204

 
189,204

 
189

 
189

 
10.00

 
11.00
2011
205,263

 
205,263

 
205

 
205

 
9.00

 
10.00
2010
141,011

 
141,011

 
141

 
141

 
9.50

 
10.50
2008
42,204

 
42,204

 
42

 
42

 
10.50

 
11.50
2007
24,728

 
24,728

 
25

 
25

 
10.75

 
11.75
2006
8,719

 
8,719

 
9

 
9

 
10.75

 
11.75
Total ESOP Preferred Stock (1)
2,036,572

 
1,251,287

 
$
2,036

 
1,251

 
 
 
 
Unearned ESOP shares (2)
 
 
 
 
$
(2,215
)
 
(1,360
)
 
 
 
 
(1)
At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, additional paid-in capital included $179 million and $109 million, respectively, related to ESOP preferred stock.
(2)
We recorded a corresponding charge to unearned ESOP shares in connection with the issuance of the ESOP Preferred Stock. The unearned ESOP shares are reduced as shares of the ESOP Preferred Stock are committed to be released.


143



Note 15: Employee Benefits
We sponsor a frozen noncontributory qualified defined benefit retirement plan called the Wells Fargo & Company Cash Balance Plan (Cash Balance Plan), which covers eligible employees of Wells Fargo. The Cash Balance Plan was frozen on July 1, 2009, and no new benefits accrue after that date.
The net periodic benefit cost was:
 



 


  
2015
 
 
2014
 
  
Pension benefits
 
 
  

 
Pension benefits
 
 
  

(in millions)
Qualified

 
Non-qualified

 
Other
benefits

 
Qualified

 
Non-qualified

 
Other
benefits

Quarter ended March 31,
  
 
 
  
 
Service cost
$

 

 
2

 

 

 
2

Interest cost
107

 
6

 
11

 
116

 
6

 
11

Expected return on plan assets
(161
)
 

 
(9
)
 
(157
)
 

 
(9
)
Amortization of net actuarial loss (gain)
27

 
5

 
(1
)
 
23

 
3

 
(7
)
Amortization of prior service credit

 

 
(1
)
 

 

 
(1
)
Settlement loss

 
13

 

 

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost (income)
$
(27
)
 
24

 
2

 
(18
)
 
9

 
(4
)





144



Note 16:  Earnings Per Common Share
The table below shows earnings per common share and diluted earnings per common share and reconciles the numerator and denominator of both earnings per common share calculations.
 
See Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) for discussion of private share repurchases and the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity.

  
Quarter ended March 31,
 
(in millions, except per share amounts)
2015

 
2014

Wells Fargo net income
$
5,804

 
5,893

Less: Preferred stock dividends and other
343

 
286

Wells Fargo net income applicable to common stock (numerator)
$
5,461

 
5,607

Earnings per common share
  
 
  
Average common shares outstanding (denominator)
5,160.4

 
5,262.8

Per share
$
1.06

 
1.07

Diluted earnings per common share
  
 
  
Average common shares outstanding
5,160.4

 
5,262.8

Add: Stock options
28.8

 
33.5

Restricted share rights
40.2

 
46.5

Warrants
14.2

 
10.5

Diluted average common shares outstanding (denominator)
5,243.6

 
5,353.3

Per share
$
1.04

 
1.05


The following table presents any outstanding options and warrants to purchase shares of common stock that were anti-dilutive (the exercise price was higher than the weighted-average market price), and therefore not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per common share.
 

 

  
Weighted-average shares
 
  
Quarter ended March 31,
 
(in millions)
2015

 
2014

Options
7.1

 
9.6



145



Note 17:  Other Comprehensive Income
The following table provides the components of other comprehensive income (OCI), reclassifications to net income by income statement line item, and the related tax effects.
  
Quarter ended March 31,
 
  
2015
 
 
2014
 
(in millions)
Before
tax

 
Tax
effect

 
Net of
tax

 
Before
tax

 
Tax
effect

 
Net of
tax

Investment securities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Net unrealized gains arising during the period
$
393

 
(47
)
 
346

 
2,725

 
(993
)
 
1,732

Reclassification of net gains to net income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest income on investment securities (1)
(3
)
 
1

 
(2
)
 
(15
)
 
6

 
(9
)
Net gains on debt securities
(278
)
 
105

 
(173
)
 
(83
)
 
31

 
(52
)
Net gains from equity investments
(19
)
 
7

 
(12
)
 
(296
)
 
112

 
(184
)
Subtotal reclassifications to net income
(300
)
 
113

 
(187
)
 
(394
)
 
149

 
(245
)
Net change
93

 
66

 
159

 
2,331

 
(844
)
 
1,487

Derivatives and hedging activities:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Net unrealized gains arising during the period
952

 
(359
)
 
593

 
44

 
(17
)
 
27

Reclassification of net (gains) losses to net income:
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest income on loans
(237
)
 
89

 
(148
)
 
(124
)
 
47

 
(77
)
Interest expense on long-term debt
4

 
(1
)
 
3

 
18

 
(7
)
 
11

Interest income on investment securities
(1
)
 
1

 

 

 

 

Subtotal reclassifications to net income
(234
)
 
89

 
(145
)
 
(106
)
 
40

 
(66
)
Net change
718

 
(270
)
 
448

 
(62
)
 
23

 
(39
)
Defined benefit plans adjustments:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Net actuarial losses arising during the period
(11
)
 
4

 
(7
)
 

 

 

Reclassification of amounts to net periodic benefit costs (2):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of net actuarial loss
31

 
(12
)
 
19

 
19

 
(7
)
 
12

Settlements and other
12

 
(5
)
 
7

 
(1
)
 

 
(1
)
Subtotal reclassifications to net periodic benefit costs
43

 
(17
)
 
26

 
18

 
(7
)
 
11

Net change
32

 
(13
)
 
19

 
18

 
(7
)
 
11

Foreign currency translation adjustments:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Net unrealized losses arising during the period
(55
)
 
(11
)
 
(66
)
 
(17
)
 
(3
)
 
(20
)
Reclassification of net losses to net income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noninterest income

 

 

 
6

 

 
6

Net change
(55
)
 
(11
)
 
(66
)
 
(11
)
 
(3
)
 
(14
)
Other comprehensive income
$
788

 
(228
)
 
560

 
2,276

 
(831
)
 
1,445

Less: Other comprehensive income from noncontrolling interests, net of tax
  
 
  
 
301

 
 
 
 
 
79

Wells Fargo other comprehensive income, net of tax
  
 
  
 
$
259

 
 
 
 
 
1,366

(1)
Represents net unrealized gains amortized over the remaining lives of securities that were transferred from the available-for-sale portfolio to the held-to-maturity portfolio.
(2)
These items are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost, which is recorded in employee benefits expense (see Note 15 (Employee Benefits) for additional details).


146



Cumulative OCI balances were:
(in millions)
Investment
securities

 
Derivatives
and
hedging
activities

 
Defined
benefit
plans
adjustments

 
Foreign
currency
translation
adjustments

 
Cumulative
other
compre-
hensive
income

Quarter ended March 31, 2015
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

Balance, beginning of period
$
4,926

 
333

 
(1,703
)
 
(38
)
 
3,518

Net unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period
346

 
593

 
(7
)
 
(66
)
 
866

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
(187
)
 
(145
)
 
26

 

 
(306
)
Net change
159

 
448

 
19

 
(66
)
 
560

Less: Other comprehensive income from noncontrolling interests
301

 

 

 

 
301

Balance, end of period
$
4,784


781


(1,684
)

(104
)

3,777

Quarter ended March 31, 2014
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

Balance, beginning of period
$
2,338

 
80

 
(1,053
)
 
21

 
1,386

Net unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period
1,732

 
27

 

 
(20
)
 
1,739

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
(245
)
 
(66
)
 
11

 
6

 
(294
)
Net change
1,487


(39
)

11


(14
)

1,445

Less: Other comprehensive income from noncontrolling interests
79

 

 

 

 
79

Balance, end of period
$
3,746


41


(1,042
)

7


2,752



147



Note 18:  Operating Segments
We have three reportable operating segments: Community Banking; Wholesale Banking; and Wealth, Brokerage and Retirement. The results for these operating segments are based on our management accounting process, for which there is no comprehensive, authoritative guidance equivalent to GAAP for financial accounting. The management accounting process measures the performance of the operating segments based on our management structure and is not necessarily comparable
 
with similar information for other financial services companies. We define our operating segments by product type and customer segment. If the management structure and/or the allocation process changes, allocations, transfers and assignments may change. For a description of our operating segments, including the underlying management accounting process, see Note 24 (Operating Segments) to Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K.

 
Community
Banking 
 
 
Wholesale
Banking
 
 
Wealth,
Brokerage
and
Retirement
 
 
Other (1)
 
 
Consolidated
Company
 
(income/expense in millions, average balances in billions)
2015

 
2014

 
2015

 
2014

 
2015

 
2014

 
2015

 
2014

 
2015

 
2014

Quarter ended March 31,
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

 
  

Net interest income (2)
$
7,561

 
7,275

 
2,921

 
2,891

 
861

 
768

 
(357
)
 
(319
)
 
10,986

 
10,615

Provision (reversal of provision) for credit losses
617

 
419

 
(6
)
 
(93
)
 
(3
)
 
(8
)
 

 
7

 
608

 
325

Noninterest income
5,223

 
5,318

 
2,991

 
2,689

 
2,872

 
2,700

 
(794
)
 
(697
)
 
10,292

 
10,010

Noninterest expense
7,064

 
6,774

 
3,409

 
3,215

 
2,831

 
2,711

 
(797
)
 
(752
)
 
12,507

 
11,948

Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
5,103

 
5,400

 
2,509

 
2,458

 
905

 
765

 
(354
)
 
(271
)
 
8,163

 
8,352

Income tax expense (benefit)
1,364

 
1,376

 
706

 
714

 
344

 
290

 
(135
)
 
(103
)
 
2,279

 
2,277

Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interests
3,739

 
4,024

 
1,803

 
1,744

 
561

 
475

 
(219
)
 
(168
)
 
5,884

 
6,075

Less: Net income (loss) from noncontrolling interests
74

 
180

 
6

 
2

 

 

 

 

 
80

 
182

Net income (loss) (3)
$
3,665

 
3,844

 
1,797

 
1,742

 
561

 
475

 
(219
)
 
(168
)
 
5,804

 
5,893

Average loans
$
506.4

 
505.0

 
337.6

 
301.9

 
56.9

 
50.0

 
(37.6
)
 
(33.1
)
 
863.3

 
823.8

Average assets
993.1

 
892.6

 
594.9

 
517.4

 
195.7

 
190.6

 
(75.9
)
 
(74.7
)
 
1,707.8

 
1,525.9

Average core deposits
668.9

 
626.5

 
303.4

 
259.0

 
161.4

 
156.0

 
(70.5
)
 
(67.7
)
 
1,063.2

 
973.8

(1)
Includes items not specific to a business segment and elimination of certain items that are included in more than one business segment, substantially all of which represents products and services for wealth management customers provided in Community Banking stores. 
(2)
Net interest income is the difference between interest earned on assets and the cost of liabilities to fund those assets. Interest earned includes actual interest earned on segment assets and, if the segment has excess liabilities, interest credits for providing funding to other segments. The cost of liabilities includes interest expense on segment liabilities and, if the segment does not have enough liabilities to fund its assets, a funding charge based on the cost of excess liabilities from another segment.
(3)
Represents segment net income (loss) for Community Banking; Wholesale Banking; and Wealth, Brokerage and Retirement segments and Wells Fargo net income for the consolidated company.


148



Note 19:  Regulatory and Agency Capital Requirements
The Company and each of its subsidiary banks are subject to regulatory capital adequacy requirements promulgated by federal bank regulatory agencies. The Federal Reserve establishes capital requirements, including well capitalized standards, for the consolidated financial holding company, and the OCC has similar requirements for the Company’s national banks, including Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the Bank).
The following table presents regulatory capital information for Wells Fargo & Company and the Bank using Basel III, which increased minimum required capital ratios, and introduced a minimum Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio. Information presented for March 31, 2015, reflects the transition to determining risk-weighted assets (RWAs) under the Basel III Standardized Approach with Transition Requirements from RWAs determined using general risk-based capital rules (General Approach) effective in 2014. The Standardized and General Approaches each apply assigned risk weights to broad risk categories but many of the risk categories and/or weights were changed by Basel III for the Standardized Approach and will generally result in higher risk-weighted assets than from those prescribed for the General Approach. We have been approved by
 
federal banking regulators, starting in second quarter 2015, to use the Advanced Approach capital framework, which involves using our internal risk models to determine RWAs and satisfying specific risk-measurement and risk-management criteria when calculating our risk-based capital requirements. The Basel III revised definition of capital, and changes are being phased-in effective January 1, 2014, through the end of 2021.
The Bank is an approved seller/servicer of mortgage loans and is required to maintain minimum levels of shareholders’ equity, as specified by various agencies, including the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, GNMA, FHLMC and FNMA. At March 31, 2015, the Bank met these requirements. Other subsidiaries, including the Company’s insurance and broker-dealer subsidiaries, are also subject to various minimum capital levels, as defined by applicable industry regulations. The minimum capital levels for these subsidiaries, and related restrictions, are not significant to our consolidated operations.
 

  
Wells Fargo & Company
 
 
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
 
 
  
 
  
 
Under Basel III
 
 
Under Basel III
 
 
March 31, 2015
 
Standardized
Approach

 
General
Approach

 
Standardized
Approach

 
General
Approach

 
Well-
capitalized
ratios (1)
 
Minimum
capital
ratios (1)
 
Mar 31,

 
Dec 31,

 
Mar 31,

 
Dec 31,

 
 
(in billions, except ratios)
2015

 
2014

 
2015

 
2014

 
 
Regulatory capital:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Common equity tier 1
$
139.2

 
137.1

 
121.1

 
119.9

 
 
 
 
Tier 1
158.8

 
154.7

 
121.1

 
119.9

 
  
 
  
Total
196.2

 
192.9

 
144.9

 
144.0

 
  
 
  
Assets:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Risk-weighted
$
1,301.5

 
1,242.5

 
1,177.7

 
1,142.5

 
  
 
  
Adjusted average (2)
1,675.7

 
1,637.0

 
1,523.0

 
1,487.6

 
  
 
  
Regulatory capital ratios:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Common equity tier 1 capital
10.69
%
 
11.04

 
10.28

 
10.49

 
6.50
 
4.50
Tier 1 capital
12.20

 
12.45

 
10.28

 
10.49

 
8.00
 
6.00
Total capital
15.08

 
15.53

 
12.31

 
12.61

 
10.00
 
8.00
Tier 1 leverage (2)
9.48

 
9.45

 
7.95

 
8.06

 
5.00
 
4.00
(1)
As defined by the regulations issued by the Federal Reserve, OCC and FDIC.
(2)
The leverage ratio consists of Tier 1 capital divided by quarterly average total assets, excluding goodwill and certain other items. The minimum leverage ratio guideline is 3% for banking organizations that do not anticipate significant growth and that have well-diversified risk, excellent asset quality, high liquidity, good earnings, effective management and monitoring of market risk and, in general, are considered top-rated, strong banking organizations.

149



Glossary of Acronyms
  
  
  
  
ABS
Asset-backed security
HAMP
Home Affordability Modification Program
ACL
Allowance for credit losses
HPI
Home Price Index
ALCO
Asset/Liability Management Committee
HUD
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
ARM 
Adjustable-rate mortgage
LCR
Liquidity Coverage Ratio
ARS 
Auction rate security
LHFS 
Loans held for sale
ASC 
Accounting Standards Codification
LIBOR 
London Interbank Offered Rate
ASU
Accounting Standards Update
LIHTC
Low-Income Housing Tax Credit
AVM
Automated valuation model
LOCOM
Lower of cost or market value
BCBS
Basel Committee on Bank Supervision
LTV 
Loan-to-value
BHC
Bank holding company
MBS
Mortgage-backed security
CCAR
Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review
MHA
Making Home Affordable programs
CDO 
Collateralized debt obligation
MHFS 
Mortgages held for sale
CDS
Credit default swaps
MSR 
Mortgage servicing right
CET1
Common Equity Tier 1
MTN
Medium-term note
CLO 
Collateralized loan obligation
NAV 
Net asset value
CLTV
Combined loan-to-value
NPA
Nonperforming asset
CMBS
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
OCC
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
CPP 
Capital Purchase Program
OCI
Other comprehensive income
CRE
Commercial real estate
OTC
Over-the-counter
DOJ
U.S. Department of Justice
OTTI
Other-than-temporary impairment
DPD
Days past due
PCI Loans
Purchased credit-impaired loans
ESOP
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
PTPP
Pre-tax pre-provision profit
FAS
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
RBC
Risk-based capital
FASB
Financial Accounting Standards Board
RMBS
Residential mortgage-backed securities
FDIC 
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
ROA
Wells Fargo net income to average total assets
FFELP
Federal Family Education Loan Program
ROE
Wells Fargo net income applicable to common stock
FHA
Federal Housing Administration
  
to average Wells Fargo common stockholders' equity
FHLB 
Federal Home Loan Bank
RWAs
Risk-weighted assets
FHLMC 
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
SEC
Securities and Exchange Commission
FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation (credit rating)
S&P
Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services
FNMA 
Federal National Mortgage Association
SPE
Special purpose entity
FRB
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
TARP
Troubled Asset Relief Program
FSB
Financial Stability Board
TDR
Troubled debt restructuring
GAAP
Generally accepted accounting principles
VA
Department of Veterans Affairs
GNMA
Government National Mortgage Association
VaR 
Value-at-Risk
GSE
Government-sponsored entity
VIE
Variable interest entity
G-SIB
Globally systemic important bank
WFCC
Wells Fargo Canada Corporation

150



PART II – OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1.            Legal Proceedings
 
Information in response to this item can be found in Note 11 (Legal Actions) to Financial Statements in this Report which information is incorporated by reference into this item.

Item 1A.         Risk Factors
 
Information in response to this item can be found under the “Financial Review – Risk Factors” section in this Report which information is incorporated by reference into this item. 

Item 2.            Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
 
The following table shows Company repurchases of its common stock for each calendar month in the quarter ended March 31, 2015.
Calendar month
Total number
of shares
repurchased (1)

 
Weighted-average
price paid per share

 
Maximum number of
shares that may yet
be repurchased under
the authorization

January (2)
22,807,070

 
$
52.15

 
217,573,094

February
12,232,119

 
53.97

 
205,340,975

March
13,387,018

 
55.44

 
191,953,957

Total
48,426,207

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
All shares were repurchased under an authorization covering up to 350 million shares of common stock approved by the Board of Directors and publicly announced by the Company on March 26, 2014. Unless modified or revoked by the Board, this authorization does not expire.
(2)
Includes a private repurchase transaction of 14,288,273 shares at a weighted-average price per share of $52.49.


The following table shows Company repurchases of the warrants for each calendar month in the quarter ended March 31, 2015.
Calendar month
Total number
of warrants
repurchased (1)

 
Average price
paid per warrant

 
Maximum dollar value
of warrants that
may yet be purchased

January

 
$

 
451,944,402

February

 

 
451,944,402

March

 

 
451,944,402

Total

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Warrants are purchased under the authorization covering up to $1 billion in warrants approved by the Board of Directors (ratified and approved on June 22, 2010). Unless modified or revoked by the Board, this authorization does not expire.

151



Item 6.
Exhibits
 
A list of exhibits to this Form 10-Q is set forth on the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such exhibits and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
The Company’s SEC file number is 001-2979. On and before November 2, 1998, the Company filed documents with the SEC under the name Norwest Corporation. The former Wells Fargo & Company filed documents under SEC file number 001-6214.
 

SIGNATURE
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
Dated: May 6, 2015                                                             WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
 
 
By:      /s/ RICHARD D. LEVY                                   
Richard D. Levy
Executive Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)

152



EXHIBIT INDEX
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Description 
 
Location 
3(a)
 
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended and in effect on the date hereof.
 
Filed herewith.
3(b)
 
By-Laws.
 
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2011.
4(a)
 
See Exhibits 3(a) and 3(b).
 
 
4(b)
 
The Company agrees to furnish upon request to the Commission a copy of each instrument defining the rights of holders of senior and subordinated debt of the Company.
 
 
10(a)
 
Wells Fargo Bonus Plan, as amended effective January 1, 2015.
 
Filed herewith.
12(a)
 
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges:
 
Filed herewith.
  
 
  
 
Quarter ended March 31,
 
 
  
  
 
  
 
2015

 
2014

 
  
  
 
Including interest on deposits
 
8.51

 
8.47

 
  
  
 
Excluding interest on deposits
 
10.87

 
11.02

 
  
 
 
 
 
 
12(b)
 
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends:
 
Filed herewith.
  
 
  
 
Quarter ended March 31,
 
 
  
  
 
  
 
2015

 
2014

 
  
  
 
Including interest on deposits
 
5.89

 
6.22

 
  
  
 
Excluding interest on deposits
 
6.86

 
7.42

 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
31(a)
 
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
Filed herewith.
31(b)
 
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
Filed herewith.
32(a)
 
Certification of Periodic Financial Report by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and 18 U.S.C. § 1350.
 
Furnished herewith.
32(b)
 
Certification of Periodic Financial Report by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and 18 U.S.C. § 1350.
 
Furnished herewith.
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document
 
Filed herewith.
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
Filed herewith.
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
Filed herewith.
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document
 
Filed herewith.
101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
Filed herewith.
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
 
Filed herewith.


153