e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009.
Or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT |
For the transition period from to .
No. 0-19028
(Commission file number)
CCFNB BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
PENNSYLVANIA
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
23-2254643
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
232 East Street, Bloomsburg, PA
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
17815
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (570) 784-4400
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirings for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of larger accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated
filer o | Accelerated
filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. Yes o No þ
On March 31, 2009, there were 2,257,946 shares of the Registrants Common stock outstanding, par
value $1.25.
CCFNB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Index to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
Number |
Part I Financial Information |
|
|
|
|
Item1. Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31,2009 (unaudited) and December 31, 2008
|
|
|
3 |
|
Consolidated Statement of Income (unaudited) for the Three months ended March
31, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
4 |
|
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity (unaudited) for the
Three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
5 |
|
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the Three Months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
6 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
|
|
7 |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
|
|
|
18 |
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
|
|
28 |
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part II Other Information
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
28 |
|
Item 1A. Risk Factors
|
|
|
28 |
|
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
29 |
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
|
|
29 |
|
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
|
|
29 |
|
Item 5. Other Information
|
|
|
29 |
|
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
29 |
|
Signatures
|
|
|
30 |
|
Exhibits |
|
|
|
|
2
PART I Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
CCFNB Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
9,050 |
|
|
$ |
10,173 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
5,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
11,454 |
|
|
|
15,485 |
|
|
Investment securities, available for sale, at fair value |
|
|
197,047 |
|
|
|
196,580 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
325,050 |
|
|
|
320,068 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
3,753 |
|
|
|
3,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net |
|
|
321,297 |
|
|
|
316,310 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
11,895 |
|
|
|
12,609 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
2,256 |
|
|
|
2,388 |
|
Cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
11,065 |
|
|
|
10,943 |
|
Investment in limited partnerships |
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
845 |
|
Intangible Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit |
|
|
3,243 |
|
|
|
3,411 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
7,937 |
|
|
|
7,937 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
2,542 |
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
569,542 |
|
|
$ |
568,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
396,391 |
|
|
$ |
381,849 |
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
50,857 |
|
|
|
52,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
447,248 |
|
|
|
434,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
41,939 |
|
|
|
55,462 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
9,131 |
|
|
|
9,133 |
|
Junior subordinate debentures |
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
4,640 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
3,711 |
|
|
|
2,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
|
507,650 |
|
|
|
507,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $1.25 per share; authorized
5,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 2,257,946 shares
in 2009 and 2,253,080 shares in 2008 |
|
|
2,822 |
|
|
|
2,816 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
27,256 |
|
|
|
27,173 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
30,167 |
|
|
|
29,164 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
1,647 |
|
|
|
1,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
61,892 |
|
|
|
60,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
569,542 |
|
|
$ |
568,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
CCFNB Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
$ |
4,733 |
|
|
$ |
2,583 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
Interest and dividends on investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
2,212 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Dividend and other interest income |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Deposits in other banks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME |
|
|
7,266 |
|
|
|
3,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
2,013 |
|
|
|
1,036 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
Junior subordinate debentures |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE |
|
|
2,273 |
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
4,993 |
|
|
|
2,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES |
|
|
4,933 |
|
|
|
2,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges and fees |
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
Gain on sale of loans |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
Brokerage |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Trust |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Other |
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL NON-INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
Employee benefits |
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
State shares tax |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Directors fees |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Other |
|
|
922 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL NON-INTEREST EXPENSE |
|
|
3,968 |
|
|
|
1,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION |
|
|
2,131 |
|
|
|
865 |
|
INCOME TAX PROVISION |
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
1,543 |
|
|
$ |
651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE |
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH DIVIDENDS PER SHARE |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING |
|
|
2,254,044 |
|
|
|
1,227,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
CCFNB Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
(In Thousands Except Per Share Data) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Surplus |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,226,536 |
|
|
$ |
1,533 |
|
|
$ |
2,271 |
|
|
$ |
27,679 |
|
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
31,627 |
|
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
651 |
|
Change in net unrealized gain on
investment securities available-for-sale,
net of reclassification adjustment and
tax effects. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issuance under dividend
reinvestment and stock purchase plans |
|
|
2,828 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
Recognition of employee stock purchase
plan expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock (2,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
Retirement of treasury stock |
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends, ($0.21 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,227,364 |
|
|
$ |
1,533 |
|
|
$ |
2,291 |
|
|
$ |
28,072 |
|
|
$ |
499 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
32,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
2,253,080 |
|
|
$ |
2,816 |
|
|
$ |
27,173 |
|
|
$ |
29,164 |
|
|
$ |
1,622 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
60,775 |
|
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,543 |
|
Change in net unrealized gain on
investment securities available-for-sale,
net of reclassification adjustment and
tax effects. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issuance under dividend
reinvestment and stock purchase plans |
|
|
4,866 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
Recognition of employee stock purchase
plan expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Cash dividends, ($0.24 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(540 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(540 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2009 |
|
|
2,257,946 |
|
|
$ |
2,822 |
|
|
$ |
27,256 |
|
|
$ |
30,167 |
|
|
$ |
1,647 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
61,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
CCFNB Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For The Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
1,543 |
|
|
$ |
651 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
Amortization and accretion on investment securities |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Deferred income taxes (provision) benefit |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
Gain on sale of loans |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans |
|
|
5,183 |
|
|
|
2,579 |
|
Originations of mortgage loans held for resale |
|
|
(5,124 |
) |
|
|
(2,381 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles and invesment in limited partnerships |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
Increases in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
Decrease in accrued interest payable |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(189 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
(30,806 |
) |
|
|
(14,942 |
) |
Proceeds from sales, maturities and redemptions |
|
|
31,171 |
|
|
|
13,789 |
|
Proceeds from redemption of regulatory stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
Purchase of regulatory stock |
|
|
(817 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net (increase) decrease in loans |
|
|
(5,534 |
) |
|
|
1,763 |
|
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used for) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(5,242 |
) |
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits |
|
|
12,939 |
|
|
|
3,405 |
|
Net decrease in short-term borrowings |
|
|
(13,523 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Repayment of long-term borrowings |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2,001 |
) |
Acquisition of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(540 |
) |
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(1,039 |
) |
|
|
1,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(4,031 |
) |
|
|
2,079 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
15,485 |
|
|
|
13,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
11,454 |
|
|
$ |
15,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
2,367 |
|
|
$ |
1,424 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
Loans transferred to other real estate owned |
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
6
CCFNB BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting and reporting policies of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc. (the Corporation) are in
accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and
conform to common practices within the banking industry. The more significant policies follow:
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc. and its
wholly-owned subsidiary, First Columbia Bank & Trust Co. (the Bank"). Columbia Financial
Corporation (CFC), the former parent company of the Bank was acquired by CCFNB Bancorp, Inc. on
July 18, 2008 and Columbia County Farmers National Bank (CCFNB) merged with and into the Bank on
July 18, 2008. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
NATURE OF OPERATIONS
The Corporation is a financial holding company that provides full-banking services, including
trust services, through the Bank, to individuals and corporate customers. The Bank has thirteen
offices covering an area of approximately 752 square miles in Northcentral Pennsylvania. The
Corporation and Bank are subject to the regulation of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking, the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
Procuring deposits and making loans are the major lines of business. The deposits are mainly
deposits of individuals and small businesses and include various types of checking accounts,
passbook and statement savings, money market accounts, interest checking accounts, individual
retirement accounts, and certificates of deposit. The Bank also offers non-insured Repo sweep
accounts. Lending products include commercial, consumer, and mortgage loans. The trust services,
trading under the name of B.B.C.T.,Co. include administration of various estates, pension plans,
self-directed IRAs and other services. A third-party brokerage arrangement is also resident in
the Lightstreet branch. This investment center offers a full line of stocks, bonds and other
non-insured financial services.
SEGMENT REPORTING
The Bank acts as an independent community financial services provider, and offers traditional
banking and related financial services to individual, business and government customers. Through
its branch, internet banking, telephone and automated teller machine network, the Bank offers a
full array of commercial and retail financial services, including the taking of time, savings and
demand deposits; the making of commercial, consumer and mortgage loans; and the providing of other
financial services. The Bank also performs personal, corporate, pension and fiduciary services
through its B.B.C.T., Co. as well as offering diverse investment products through its investment
center.
Management does not separately allocate expenses, including the cost of funding loan demand,
between the commercial, retail, trust and investment center operations of the Corporation. As
such, discrete financial information is not available and segment reporting would not be
meaningful.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of these consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The Corporation classifies its investment securities as either held-to-maturity or
available-for-sale at the time of purchase. Debt securities are classified as held-to-maturity
when the Corporation has the ability and positive intent to hold the securities to maturity.
Investment securities held-to-maturity are carried at cost adjusted for amortization of premiums
and accretion of discounts to maturity.
Debt securities not classified as held-to-maturity and equity securities included in the
available-for-sale category, are carried at fair value, and the amount of any unrealized gain or
loss net of the effect of deferred income taxes is reported as other comprehensive income in the
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity. Managements decision to sell
available-for-sale securities is based on changes in economic conditions controlling the sources
and uses of funds, terms, availability of and yield of alternative investments, interest rate risk,
and the need for liquidity.
The cost of debt securities classified as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale is adjusted
for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such amortization and
accretion, as well as interest and dividends, is included in interest income from investments.
Realized gains and losses are included in net investment securities gains. The cost of investment
securities sold, redeemed or matured is based on the specific identification method.
7
LOANS
Loans are stated at their outstanding principal balances, net of deferred fees or costs,
unearned income, and the allowance for loan losses. Interest on loans is accrued on the principal
amount outstanding, primarily on an actual day basis. Non-refundable loan fees and certain direct
costs are deferred and amortized over the life of the loans using the interest method. The
amortization is reflected as an interest yield adjustment, and the deferred portion of the net fees
and costs is reflected as a part of the loan balance.
Real estate mortgage loans held for resale are carried at the lower of cost or market on an
aggregate basis. A portion of these loans are sold with limited recourse by the Corporation.
Past Due Loans Generally, a loan is considered past due when a payment is in
arrears for a period of 10 or 15 days, depending on the type of loan. Delinquent notices are
issued at this point and related collection efforts will commence and continue until final
resolution. Past due loans are continually evaluated with determination for charge-off being made
when no reasonable chance remains that the status of the loan can be improved.
Non-Accrual Loans Generally, a loan is classified as non-accrual, with the accrual
of interest on such a loan discontinued when the contractual payment of principal or interest has
become 90-days past due or management has serious doubts about further collectability of principal
or interest, even though the loan currently is performing. A loan may remain on accrual status if
it is in the process of collection and is either guaranteed or well-secured. When a loan is placed
on non-accrual status, unpaid interest credited to income in the current year is reversed, and
unpaid interest accrued in prior years is charged against the allowance for loan losses. Certain
non-accrual loans may continue to perform wherein payments are still being received with those
payments generally applied to principal. Non-accrual loans remain under constant scrutiny and if
performance continues, interest income may be recorded on a cash basis based on managements
judgment as to collectability of principal.
Impaired Loans A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and
events, it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due according to
the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Under current accounting standards, the allowance for
loan losses related to impaired loans is based on discounted cash flows using the loans effective
interest rate or the fair value of the collateral for certain collateral dependent loans. The
recognition of interest income on impaired loans is the same as for non-accrual loans discussed
above.
Allowance for Loan Losses The allowance for loan losses is established through
provisions for loan losses charged against income. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged
against the allowance for loan losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the
allowance.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level established by management to be
adequate to absorb estimated potential loan losses. Managements periodic evaluation of the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based on the Corporations past loan loss experience,
known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers
ability to repay (including the timing of future payments), the estimated value of any underlying
collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions, and other relevant
factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates, including the
amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans that may be
susceptible to significant change.
In addition, an allowance is provided for possible credit losses on off-balance sheet credit
exposures. The allowance is estimated by management and is classified in other liabilities.
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation computed principally
on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Maintenance and minor
repairs are charged to operations as incurred. The cost and accumulated depreciation of the
premises and equipment retired or sold are eliminated from the property accounts at the time of
retirement or sale, and the resulting gain or loss is reflected in current operations.
MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS
The Bank originates and sells real estate loans to investors in the secondary mortgage market.
After the sale, the Bank retains the right to service these loans. When originated mortgage loans
are sold and servicing is retained, a servicing asset is capitalized based on relative fair value
at the date of sale. Servicing assets are amortized as an offset to other fees in proportion to,
and over the period of, estimated net servicing income. The unamortized cost is included in other
assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The servicing rights are periodically
evaluated for impairment based on their relative fair value.
JUNIOR SUBORDINATE DEBENTURES
During 2006, CFC issued $4,640,000 in junior debentures due December 15, 2036 to Columbia
Financial Statutory Trust I (Trust). On July 18, 2008, the Corporation became the successor to
CFC and to this Trust, respectively. The Corporation owns all of the $140,000 in common equity of
the Trust and the debentures are the sole asset of the Trust. The Trust, a wholly-owned
unconsolidated subsidiary of the Corporation, issued $4,500,000 of floating-rate trust capital
securities in a non-public offering in reliance on Section 4 (2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
The floating-rate capital securities provide for quarterly distributions at a variable annual
coupon rate, reset quarterly, based on the 3-month LIBOR plus 1.75%. The coupon rate was 3.75% at
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The securities are callable by the Corporation, subject to
any required regulatory approval, at par, after five years. The Corporation unconditionally
guarantees the trust capital securities. The terms of the junior subordinated debentures and the
common equity of the trust mirror the terms of the trust capital securities issued by the Trust.
8
INTANGIBLE ASSETS GOODWILL
Goodwill represents the excess for the purchase price over the fair market value of net assets
acquired. The Corporation has recorded net goodwill of $7,937,000 at March 31, 2009 and December
31, 2008 related to the 2008 acquisition of Columbia Financial Corporation and its subsidiary,
First Columbia Bank & Trust Co. In accordance with current accounting standards, goodwill is not
amortized, but evaluated at least annually for impairment. Any impairment of goodwill results in a
charge to income. The Corporation periodically assesses whether events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amounts of goodwill and other intangible assets may be impaired.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS CORE DEPOSIT
The Corporation has an amortizable intangible asset related to the deposit premium paid for
the acquisition of Columbia Financial Corporations subsidiary, First Columbia Bank & Trust Co.
This intangible asset is being amortized on a sum of the years digits method over 10 years and has
a carrying value of $3,243,000 and $3,411,000, net of accumulated amortization of $447,000 and
$279,000, as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The recoverability of the
carrying value is evaluated on an ongoing basis, and permanent declines in value, if any, are
charged to expense. Amortization of the core deposit intangible amounted to $168,000 and $0 for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectivley.
The estimated amortization expense of the core deposit intangible over its remaining life is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended: |
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2009 |
|
$ |
475,000 |
|
2010 |
|
|
576,000 |
|
2011 |
|
|
509,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
442,000 |
|
2013 |
|
|
374,000 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
867,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,243,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED
Real estate properties acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and
are initially recorded at fair value on the date of foreclosure establishing a new cost basis.
After foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the real estate is
carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell and is included in other
assets. Revenues derived from and costs to maintain the assets and subsequent gains and losses on
sales are included in other non-interest income and expense. The amount of other real estate owned
was $670,000 and $373,000 as of March 31, 2009 and December 31,2008, respectively and is included
in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
BANK OWNED LIFE INSURANCE
The Corporation invests in Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI). Purchase of BOLI provides life
insurance coverage on certain employees with the Corporation being owner and primary beneficiary of
the policies.
INVESTMENTS IN LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS
The Corporation is a limited partner in three partnerships at December 31, 2008 that provide
low income elderly housing in the Corporations geographic market area. The investments are
accounted for under the effective yield method under the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 94-1
Accounting for Tax Benefits Resulting from Investments in Affordable Housing Projects. Under the
effective yield method, the Corporation recognizes tax credits as they are allocated and amortizes
the initial cost of the investment to provide a constant effective yield over the period that the
tax credits are allocated to the Corporation. Under this method, the tax credits allocated, net
of any amortization of the investment in the limited partnerships, are recognized in the
consolidated statements of income as a component of income tax expense. The amount of tax credits
allocated to the Corporation were $93,000 and the amortization of the investments in limited
partnerships was $39,000 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The carrying value of the Corporations investments in limited partnerships was
$806,000 and $845,000 as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
INVESTMENT IN INSURANCE AGENCY
The Corporation owns a 50 percent interest in a local insurance agency, a corporation
organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The income or loss from this
investment is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The carrying value of this
investment as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $222,000 and $218,000, respectively, and
is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes is based on the results of operations, adjusted primarily for
tax-exempt income. Certain items of income and expense are reported in different periods for
financial reporting and tax return purposes. Deferred tax assets and
9
liabilities are determined based on the differences between the consolidated financial
statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities measured by using the enacted tax rates
and laws expected to be in effect when the timing differences are expected to reverse. Deferred
tax expense or benefit is based on the difference between deferred tax asset or liability from
period to period.
PER SHARE DATA
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128, Earnings Per Share, requires
dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share is calculated
by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding at the
end of each period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by increasing the denominator for the
assumed conversion of all potentially dilutive securities. The Corporation does not have any
securities which have or will have a dilutive effect, so accordingly, basic and diluted per share
data are the same.
CASH FLOW INFORMATION
For purposes of reporting consolidated cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on
hand and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in other banks and federal funds sold. The
Corporation considers cash classified as interest-bearing deposits with other banks as a cash
equivalent because they are represented by cash accounts essentially on a demand basis. Federal
funds are also included as a cash equivalent because they are generally purchased and sold for
one-day periods.
TRUST ASSETS AND INCOME
Property held by the Corporation in a fiduciary or agency capacity for its customers is not
included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements because such items are not assets of
the Corporation and the Bank. Trust Department income is generally recognized on a cash basis and
is not materially different than if it was reported on an accrual basis.
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The Corporation is required to present accumulated other comprehensive income in a full set of
general-purpose financial statements for all periods presented. Accumulated other comprehensive
income is comprised of unrealized holding gains on the available for sale investment securities
portfolio. The Corporation has elected to report the effects of other comprehensive income as part
of the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity.
ADVERTISING COSTS
It is the Corporations policy to expense advertising costs in the period in which they are
incurred Advertising expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was approximately
$39,000 and $17,000, respectively.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. SFAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 (FSP 140-4),
Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in
Variable Interest Entities. FSP 140-4 amends FASB Statement No. 140 to require public entities to
provide additional disclosures about transfers of financial assets. It also amends FASB
Interpretation No. 46 to require public enterprises, including sponsors that have a variable
interest in a variable interest entity, to provide additional disclosures about their involvement
with variable interest entities.
Additionally, this FSP requires certain disclosures to be provided by a public enterprise that
is (a) a sponsor of a qualifying special purpose entity (QSPE) that holds a variable interest in
the QSPE but was not the transferor (non-transferor) of financial assets into the QSPE; and (b) a
servicer of a QSPE that holds a significant interest in the QSP but was not the transferor
(non-transferor) of financial assets to the QSPE. The Corporation does not have involvement with
any variable interest entities.
In January 2009, the FASB ratified EITF 99-20-1, Amendments to the Impairment Guidance of
EITF Issue 99-20. EITF 99-20-I amends the impairment guidance in EITF 99-20 to achieve more
consistent determination of whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. EITF 99-20-1
was effective December 31, 2008. The change in the impairment guidance with the issuance of FSP
EITF 990-20I was effective December 31, 2008. The change in the impairment guidance with the
issuance of FSP EITF 99-20-I was effective December 31, 2008. The change in the impairment
guidance with the issuance of FSP EITF 99-20-I did not result in any material impact on the
Corporations consolidated financial condition, results of operation or liquidity.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued State of Financial
Accounting Standards SFAS 141(R), Business Combinations. SFAS 141(R) will significantly change
how entities apply the acquisition method to business combinations. The most significant changes
affecting how the Corporation will account for business combinations under this Statement include:
the acquisition date will be the date the acquirer obtains control; all (and only) identifiable
assets acquired,
liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling interests in the acquiree will be stated at fair value on
the acquisition date; assets or liabilities arising from noncontractual contingencies will be
measured at their acquisition date fair value only if it is more likely than not that they meet the
definition of an asset or liability on the acquisition date; adjustments subsequently made to the
provisional amounts recorded on the acquisition date will be made retroactively during a
measurement period not to exceed one year; acquisition-related restructuring costs that do not meet
the criteria in SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, will
be expensed as incurred; transaction costs will be expensed as incurred; reversals of deferred
income tax valuation allowances and
10
income tax contingencies will be recognized in earnings subsequent to the measurement period; and
the allowance for loan losses of an acquiree will not be permitted to be recognized by the
acquirer. Additionally, SFAS 141(R) will require new and modified disclosures surrounding
subsequent changes to acquisition-related contingencies, contingent consideration, noncontrolling
interests, acquisition-related transaction costs, fair values and cash flows not expected to be
collected for acquired loans, and an enhanced goodwill rollforward.
The Corporation will be required to prospectively apply SFAS 141(R) to all business
combinations completed on or after January 1, 2009. Early adoption is not permitted. For business
combinations in which the acquisition date was before the effective date, the provisions of SFAS
141(R) will apply to the subsequent accounting for deferred income tax valuation allowances and
income tax contingencies and will require any changes in those amounts to be recorded in earnings.
The Corporation will adopt SFAS 141(R) for any business combinations occurring at or subsequent to
January 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards SFAS 160,
"Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB 51. SFAS 160
establishes new accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 will require entities to classify noncontrolling
interests as a component of stockholders equity and will require subsequent changes in ownership
interest in a subsidiary to be accounted for as an equity transaction. Additionally, SFAS 160 will
require entities to recognize a gain or loss upon the loss of control of a subsidiary and to
remeasure any ownership interest retained at fair value on that date. This statement also requires
expanded disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and
the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS 160 is effective on a prospective basis for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15,
2008, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which are required to be applied
retrospectively. Early adoption is not permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected
to have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial condition, results of
operations or liquidity.
EITF 06-4, Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of
Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements, was issued in September 2006 and is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007 with earlier application permitted.
EITF 06-4 requires that, for split-dollar life insurance arrangements that provide a benefit to an
employee that extends to postretirement periods, an employer should recognize a liability for
future benefits in accordance with SFAS No. 106. EITF 06-4 requires that recognition of the
effects of adoption should be either by (a) a change in accounting principle through a
cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the year of adoption or
(b) a change in accounting principle through retrospective application to all prior periods. The
Corporation adopted this standard as of January 1, 2007 through a cumulative-effect adjustment to
beginning retained earnings. This adjustment represented a decrease of $12,000 to retained
earnings.
In June 2007, the FASB ratified the consensus reached in EITF 06-11, Accounting for Income
Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards. EITF 06-11 applies to entities that have
share-based payment arrangements that entitle employees to receive dividends or dividend
equivalents on equity-classified nonvested shares when those dividends or dividend equivalents are
charged to retained earnings and result in an income tax deduction. Entities that have share-based
payment arrangements that fall within the scope of EITF 06-11 will be required to increase capital
surplus for any realized income tax benefit associated with dividends or dividend equivalents paid
to employees for equity classified nonvested equity awards. Any increase recorded to capital
surplus is required to be included in an entitys pool of excess tax benefits that are available to
absorb potential future tax deficiencies on share-based payment awards. The Corporation adopted
EITF 06-11 on January 1, 2008 for dividends declared on share-based payment awards subsequent to
this date. The impact of adoption did not have a material impact on consolidated financial
condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
In April 2007, the FASB issued FSP 39-1, Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39, Offsetting
of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts. FSP 39-1 permits entities to offset fair value amounts
recognized for multiple derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under a master
netting agreement. FSP 39-1 clarifies that the fair value amounts recognized for the right to
reclaim cash collateral, or the obligation to return cash collateral, arising from the same master
netting arrangement, should also be offset against the fair value of the related derivative
instruments.
Effective January 1, 2008, the Corporation adopted a net presentation for derivative positions
and related collateral entered into under master netting agreements pursuant to the guidance in FIN
39 and FSP 39-1. The adoption of this guidance would result in balance sheet reclassifications of
certain cash collateral-based short-term investments against the related derivative liabilities and
certain deposit liability balances against the related fair values of derivative assets. The
effects of these reclassifications will fluctuate based on the fair values of derivative contracts
but overall would not have a material impact on either total assets or total liabilities. The
adoption of these standards did not have an impact on the Corporations consolidated financial
condition, results of operations or liquidity.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Liabilities. The statement allows an entity to elect to measure certain financial assets and
liabilities at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the income statement each
period. The statement also requires additional disclosures to identify the effects of an entitys
fair value
11
election on its earnings. The election is irrevocable. The Corporation has chosen not to
elect to measure any specific group of financial assets or liabilities pursuant to SFAS 159.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards SFAS 158 Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Post Retirement Plans which requires the Corporation to recognize the funded status of a
benefit plan as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet and to recognize as
a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the unrecognized actuarial gains or losses,
prior service costs and transition obligations that arise during the period. The adoption of SFAS
158 for the year ended December 31, 2008 did not have a material impact on the Corporations
consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards SFAS 157, Fair
Value Measurements, which upon adoption will replace various definitions of fair value in existing
accounting literature with a single definition, will establish a framework for measuring fair
value, and will require additional disclosures about fair value measurements. The statement
clarifies that fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or the price paid to
transfer a liability in the most advantageous market available to the entity and emphasizes that
fair value is a market-based measurement and should be based on the assumptions market participants
would use. The statement also creates a three-level hierarchy under which individual fair value
estimates are to be ranked based on the relative reliability of the inputs used in the valuation.
This hierarchy is the basis for the disclosure requirements, with fair value estimates based on the
least reliable inputs requiring more extensive disclosures about the valuation method used and the
gains and losses associated with those estimates. SFAS 157 is required to be applied whenever
another financial accounting standard requires or permits an asset or liability to be measured at
fair value. The statement does not expand the use of fair value to any new circumstances. The
Corporation has applied the new guidance beginning January 1, 2008, and such application did not
have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial condition, results of operations
or liquidity.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FSP 13-2, Accounting for a Change or
Projected Change in the Timing of Cash Flows Relating to Income Taxes Generated by a Leveraged
Lease Transaction. This FSP amends SFAS 13, Accounting for Leases, to require a lessor in a
leveraged lease transaction to recalculate the leveraged lease for the effects of a change or
projected change in the timing of cash flows relating to income taxes that are generated by the
leveraged lease. The guidance in FSP 13-2 was adopted by the Corporation on January 1, 2007. The
application of this FSP did not have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial
condition, results of operations or liquidity.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, an interpretation of SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a
comprehensive model for how companies should recognize, measure, present, and disclose in their
financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. Under
FIN 48, tax positions shall initially be recognized in the financial statements when it is more
likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such tax
positions shall initially and subsequently be measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is
greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority assuming
full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. FIN 48 also revises disclosure requirements
to include an annual tabular roll-forward of unrecognized tax benefits. The provisions of this
interpretation were adopted by the Corporation on January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not
have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial condition, results of operations
or liquidity.
In March 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards SFAS 156,
Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets, an amendment of SFAS 140. This standard requires
entities to separately recognize a servicing asset or liability whenever it undertakes an
obligation to service financial assets and also requires all separately recognized servicing assets
or liabilities to be initially measured at fair value. Additionally, this standard permits
entities to choose among two alternatives, the amortization method or fair value measurement
method, for the subsequent measurement of each class of separately recognized servicing assets and
liabilities. Under the amortization method, an entity shall amortize the value of servicing assets
or liabilities in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income or net
servicing loss and assess servicing assets or liabilities for impairment or increased obligation
based on fair value at each reporting date. Under the fair value measurement method, an entity
shall measure servicing assets or liabilities at fair value at each reporting date and report
changes in fair value in earnings in the period in which the changes occur.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Corporation adopted this statement by electing amortization
method as its measurement method for residential real estate mortgage servicing rights (MSRs).
In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards SFAS 155,
Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments, which amends SFAS 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and SFAS 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. SFAS 155 requires entities to
evaluate and identify whether interests in securitized financial assets are freestanding
derivatives, hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring
bifurcation, or hybrid financial instruments that contain embedded
12
derivatives that do not require bifurcation. SFAS 155 also permits fair value measurement for any
hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require
bifurcation. This statement was effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued by the
Corporation on or after January 1, 2007 and the adoption of SFAS 155 did not have a material impact
on the Corporations consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements of the prior years have been
reclassified to conform with presentations used in the 2009 consolidated financial statements.
Such reclassifications had no effect on the Corporations consolidated financial condition or net
income.
2. ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
3,758 |
|
|
$ |
1,437 |
|
Provision charged to operations |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged off |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, |
|
$ |
3,753 |
|
|
$ |
1,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009, the total recorded investment in loans that are considered to be
impaired as defined by SFAS No. 114 was $4,858,000. These impaired loans had a related allowance
for loan losses of $508,000. No additional charge to operations was required to provide for the
impaired loans since the total allowance for loan losses is estimated by management to be adequate
to provide for the loan loss allowance required by SFAS No. 114 along with any other potential
losses.
3. SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and Federal Home Loan Bank advances generally
represented overnight or less than 30-day borrowings. U.S. Treasury tax and loan notes for
collections made by the Bank were payable on demand.
4. LONG-TERM BORROWINGS
Long-term borrowings consist of advances due to the FHLB Pittsburgh.
5. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS
The Bank has entered into certain non-qualified deferred compensation agreements with certain
executive officers and directors. Expenses related to these non-qualified deferred compensation
plans amounted to $43,000 and $39,000 for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
There were no substantial changes in other plans as disclosed in the 2008 Annual Report.
6. ACQUISITION
On July 18, 2008, the Corporation completed its acquisition of Columbia Financial
Corporation(CFC). Under the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of
November 29, 2007, CFC merged with and into the Corporation; and the Corporations wholly-owned
subsidiary, Columbia County Farmers National Bank merged with and into the Bank. The Corporation
acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of CFC for a total purchase price of $26,316,000. The
transaction was accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. In
connection therewith, the Corporation issued approximately 1,030,286 shares of its common stock
and paid cash of approximately $3,000 in lieu of the issuance of fractional shares in exchange for
all of the issued and outstanding shares of CFC common stock. Assets and liabilities of CFC are
recorded at estimated fair values as of the acquisition date and the results of the acquired entity
operations are included in income from that date. The fair values of acquired assets and
liabilities, including identified intangible assets, are finalized as quickly as possible following
the acquisition. The
CFC purchase price allocation is substantially complete; however, its valuations may be
subject to revision as additional information becomes available. Purchase accounting adjustments
determinable within twelve months of acquisition date result in adjustments to goodwill.
The following table shows the excess purchase price of the carrying value of net assets
acquired, purchase price allocation and resulting goodwill recorded for this acquisition. Changes
to the carrying amount of goodwill, premises and equipment and junior subordinate debentures, since
the merger date, reflect additional information obtained about the fair value of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed.
13
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase price |
|
$ |
26,316 |
|
Carrying value of net assets acquired |
|
|
(17,855 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess of purchase price over carrying value
of net assets acquired |
|
|
8,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
30 |
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
853 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
1,235 |
|
Severance and related costs |
|
|
840 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
11,627 |
|
Core deposit intangibles |
|
|
(3,690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
7,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarized the estimated fair value of net assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
5,157 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
|
|
129 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
517 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
138,257 |
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses |
|
|
160,724 |
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
6,492 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
1,534 |
|
Bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
3,462 |
|
Investment in limited partnerships |
|
|
919 |
|
Goodwill and other intangibles |
|
|
11,627 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
329,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
264,692 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
31,883 |
|
Junior subordinate debentures |
|
|
4,640 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
764 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
303,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of net assets acquired |
|
$ |
26,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
7. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK AND CONCENTRATIONS OF
CREDIT RISK
The Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal
course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments
include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit.
Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess
of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The contract or notional amounts of
those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Corporation has in particular classes of
financial instruments. The Corporation does not engage in trading activities with respect to any
of its financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk.
14
The Corporation may require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with
off-balance sheet credit risk. The contract or notional amounts at March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Financial instruments whose contract amounts repsresent credit risk: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$ |
72,831 |
|
|
$ |
68,412 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
3,197 |
|
|
|
3,064 |
|
Dealer floor plans |
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
1,129 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no
violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Because many of
the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do
not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Corporation evaluates each customers
creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary
by the Corporation upon extension of credit, is based on managements credit evaluation of the
counter-party. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property,
plant, equipment and income-producing commercial properties.
Standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued
by the Corporation to guarantee payment to a third party when a customer either fails to repay an
obligation or fails to perform some non-financial obligation. The credit risk involved in issuing
letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to
customers. The Corporation holds collateral supporting those commitments for which collateral is
deemed necessary.
The Corporations exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to
the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and letters of credit is represented by
the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit
policies in making commitments and conditional obligations, as it does for on-balance sheet
instruments.
The Corporation granted commercial, consumer and residential loans to customers primarily
within Pennsylvania. Of the total loan portfolio at March 31, 2009, 83.5% was for real estate
loans, primarily residential. It was the opinion of management that this high concentration did
not pose an adverse credit risk. Further, it is managements opinion that the remainder of the
loan portfolio was balanced and diversified to the extent necessary to avoid any significant
concentration of credit.
8. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Effective January 1, 2008, the Corporation adopted SFAS No. 157, which, among other things,
requires enhanced disclosures about assets and liabilities carried at fair value. SFAS No. 157
establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observability
utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value. The three broad levels defined by SFAS
No.157 hierarchy are as follows:
Level I: |
|
Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date. |
|
Level II: |
|
Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly
observables as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities include
items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently, and items that
are fair valued using other financial instruments of which can be directly observed. |
|
Level III: |
|
Assets and liabilities that have little or no pricing observability as of the
reported date. These items do not have two-way markets and are measured using managements
best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into determination of fair value
require significant management judgment or estimation. |
The following table presents the assets reported on the consolidated statements of financial
condition at their fair value as of March 31, 2009 by level within the fair value hierarchy. As
required by SFAS No. 157, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based
on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
(In Thousands) |
|
Level I |
|
Level II |
|
Level III |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Securities, available-for-sale
|
|
$ |
1,617 |
|
|
$ |
195,430 |
|
|
$
|
|
$ |
197,047 |
|
15
At March 31, 2009, investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the valuation
methods used are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Level I |
|
|
Level II |
|
|
Level III |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation of US Government Agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
129,123 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
129,123 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,923 |
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,400 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,617 |
|
Restricted equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,617 |
|
|
$ |
195,430 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
197,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated fair values of equity securities classified as Level I are derived from quoted
market prices in active markets; these assets consists mainly of stocks held in other banks. The
estimated fair values of all debt securities classified as Level II are obtained from
nationally-recognized third-party pricing agencies. The estimated fair values are derived
primarily from cash flow models, which include assumptions for interest rates, credit losses, and
prepayment speeds. The significant inputs utilized in the cash flow models are based on market
data obtained from sources independent of the Corporation (observable inputs), and are therefore
classified as Level II within the fair value hierarchy.
NOTE 9 MANAGEMENTS ASSERTIONS AND COMMENTS REQUIRED TO BE PROVIDED WITH FORM 10Q
FILING
In managements opinion, the consolidated interim financial statements reflect fair
presentation of the consolidated financial position of the Corporation, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for the interim periods presented. Further, the consolidated
interim financial statements are unaudited, however they reflect all adjustments, which are in the
opinion of management, necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial condition and
consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented and that all
such adjustments to the consolidated financial statements are of a normal recurring nature.
These consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
requirements of Form 10Q and therefore do not include all disclosures normally required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to financial
institutions as included with consolidated financial statements included in the Corporations
annual Form 10K filing. The reader of these consolidated interim financial statements may wish to
refer to the Corporations annual report or Form 10K for the period ended December 31, 2008 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
16
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc.:
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
as of March 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders
equity and cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. These
consolidated interim financial statements are the responsibility of the management of CCFNB
Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the
consolidated interim financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc.
and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes
in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our
report dated March 10, 2009, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2008, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the
consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ J. H. Williams & Co., LLP
J.H. Williams & Co., LLP
Kingston, Pennsylvania
May 12, 2009
17
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
Certain statements in this section and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, other
periodic reports filed by us under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any other
written or oral statements made by or on behalf of us may include forward looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 which reflect our
current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Such forward looking
statements are based on general assumptions and are subject to various risks, uncertainties, and
other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from the views, beliefs and
projections expressed in such statements. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but
are not limited to:
|
|
|
Our business and financial results are affected by business and economic
conditions, both generally and specifically in the Northcentral Pennsylvania market
in which we operate. In particular, our businesses and financial results may be
impacted by: |
|
|
|
|
Changes in interest rates and valuations in the debt, equity and other financial
markets. |
|
|
|
|
Disruptions in the liquidity and other functioning of financial markets,
including such disruptions in the market for real estate and other assets commonly
securing financial products. |
|
|
|
|
Actions by the Federal Reserve Board and other government agencies, including
those that impact money supply and market interest rates. |
|
|
|
|
Changes in our customers and suppliers performance in general and their
creditworthiness in particular. |
|
|
|
|
Changes in customer preferences and behavior, whether as a result of changing
business and economic conditions or other factors. |
|
|
|
|
Changes resulting from the newly enacted Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of
2008. |
|
|
|
|
A continuation of recent turbulence in significant segments of the United States
and global financial markets, particularly if it worsens, could impact our
performance, both directly by affecting our revenues and the value of our assets and
liabilities and indirectly by affecting our customers and suppliers and the economy
generally. |
|
|
|
|
Our business and financial performance could be impacted as the financial
industry restructures in the current environment by changes in the competitive
landscape. |
|
|
|
|
Given current economic and financial market conditions, our forward-looking
financial statements are subject to the risk that these conditions will be
substantially different than we are currently expecting. These statements are based
on our current expectations that interest rates will remain low through 2009 with
continued wide market credit spreads and our view that national economic trends
currently point to a continuation of severe recessionary conditions through 2009
followed by a subdued recovery. |
|
|
|
|
Legal and regulatory developments could have an impact on our ability to operate
our businesses or our financial condition or results of operations or our
competitive position or reputation. Reputational impacts, in turn, could affect
matters such as business generation and retention, our ability to attract and retain
management, liquidity and funding. These legal and regulatory developments could
include: (a) the unfavorable resolution of legal proceedings or regulatory and other
governmental inquiries; (b) increased litigation risk from recent regulatory and
other governmental developments; (c) the results of the regulatory examination
process, and regulators future use of supervisory and enforcement tools; (d)
legislative and regulatory reforms, including changes to laws and regulations
involving tax, pension, education and mortgage lending, the protection of confidential
customer information, and other aspects of the financial institution industry; and (e)
changes in accounting policies and principles. |
|
|
|
|
Our business and operating results are affected by our ability to identify and
effectively manage risks inherent in our businesses, including, where appropriate,
through the effective use of third-party insurance and capital management
techniques. |
18
|
|
|
Our ability to anticipate and respond to technological changes can have an impact
on our ability to respond to customer needs and to meet competitive demands. |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to implement our business initiatives and strategies could affect our
financial performance over the next several years. |
|
|
|
|
Competition can have an impact on customer acquisition, growth and retention, as
well as on our credit spreads and product pricing, which can affect market share,
deposits and revenues. |
|
|
|
|
Our business and operating results can also be affected by widespread natural
disasters, terrorist activities or international hostilities, either as a result of
the impact on the economy and capital and other financial markets generally or on us
or on our customers and suppliers. |
The words believe, expect, anticipate, project and similar expressions signify forward
looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward looking
statements made by or on behalf of us. Any such statement speaks only as of the date the statement
was made. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward looking statements.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the detailed
information and consolidated financial statements, including notes thereto, included elsewhere in
this Annual Report. Our consolidated financial condition and results of operations are essentially
those of our subsidiary, the Bank. Therefore, the analysis that follows is directed to the
performance of the Bank.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
NET INTEREST INCOME
2009 vs. 2008
Tax-equivalent net interest income increased $3.0 million to $5.2 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009. Reported tax-equivalent interest income increased $3.8 million to
$7.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The increase primarily resulted from the
acquisition of Columbia Financial Corporation (CFC) as described in Note 6 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. The acquisition of CFC
contributed an increase in net loans in the amount of $160.7 million, an increase in investment
securities in the amount of $138.3 million, an increase in federal funds sold in the amount of
$517,000, and an increase in interest-bearing deposits in other banks of $129,000. Reported
interest expense increased $1.3 million or 21.3 percent to $7.5 million. The acquisition of CFC
contributed an increase in deposits in the amount of $264.7 million, an increase in other
borrowings of $31.9 million, and an increase of $4.6 million in junior subordinate debentures.
Net interest margin increased to 3.95 percent at March 31, 2009 from 3.79 percent at March 31,
2008. The increase in margin resulted primarily from the yield on interest-bearing deposits
decreasing 69 basis points to 2.07 percent at March 31, 2009 while the yield on total borrowings
decreased 223 basis points to 1.75 percent at March 31, 2009. A decrease of 252 basis points on
the short-term borrowings for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was the primary reason for
the yield decrease in the total borrowings as the long-term borrowing yield decreased 1 basis point
over the same period. The short-term borrowing had an average balance of $46.6 million and $28.7
million as of March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The yield decreases were driven by the rate
decreases enacted throughout 2008 by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) as well as local
market competition. The yield on interest-earning assets decreased 59 basis points to 5.70
percent for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The yield on total loans decreased 76 basis
points to 6.31 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
The following Average Balance Sheet and Rate Analysis table presents the average assets,
actual income or expense and the average yield on assets, liabilities and stockholders equity for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
19
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET AND RATE ANALYSIS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Average Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average Rate |
|
|
Average Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average Rate |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt loans |
|
$ |
19,891 |
|
|
$ |
308 |
|
|
|
6.28 |
% |
|
$ |
12,852 |
|
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
|
6.88 |
% |
All other loans |
|
|
303,855 |
|
|
|
4,733 |
|
|
|
6.32 |
% |
|
|
147,855 |
|
|
|
2,583 |
|
|
|
7.08 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans (2)(3)(4) |
|
|
323,746 |
|
|
|
5,041 |
|
|
|
6.31 |
% |
|
|
160,707 |
|
|
|
2,801 |
|
|
|
7.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable securities |
|
|
180,892 |
|
|
|
2,238 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
% |
|
|
55,719 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
4.54 |
% |
Tax-exempt securitites (3) |
|
|
9,351 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
5.65 |
% |
|
|
3,907 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
7.06 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities |
|
|
190,243 |
|
|
|
2,370 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
% |
|
|
59,626 |
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
4.71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
10,722 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
% |
|
|
8,201 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
3.16 |
% |
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.71 |
% |
|
|
1,730 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
525,284 |
|
|
|
7,417 |
|
|
|
5.70 |
% |
|
|
230,264 |
|
|
|
3,580 |
|
|
|
6.29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
44,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
569,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
249,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings |
|
$ |
55,231 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
% |
|
$ |
24,094 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
% |
Now deposits |
|
|
69,265 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
% |
|
|
28,054 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
% |
Money market deposits |
|
|
42,289 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
1.22 |
% |
|
|
7,375 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
% |
Time deposits |
|
|
227,652 |
|
|
|
1,806 |
|
|
|
3.22 |
% |
|
|
92,840 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
4.28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
394,437 |
|
|
|
2,013 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
% |
|
|
152,363 |
|
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
2.76 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
46,623 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
% |
|
|
28,705 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
3.22 |
% |
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
9,132 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
6.08 |
% |
|
|
10,257 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
6.09 |
% |
Junior subordinate debentures |
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
3.67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings |
|
|
60,395 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
1.75 |
% |
|
|
38,962 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
3.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
454,832 |
|
|
|
2,273 |
|
|
|
2.03 |
% |
|
|
191,325 |
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
3.01 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
|
49,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
3,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
61,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
569,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
249,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/margin (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,144 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,162 |
|
|
|
3.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average volume information was compared using daily (or monthly) averages for interest-earning and bearing accounts.
Certain balance sheet items utilized quarter-end balances for averages. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest on loans includes fee income. |
|
(3) |
|
Tax exempt interest revenue is shown on a tax-equivalent basis using a statutory federal income tax rate of 34 percent for 2009 and 2008. |
|
(4) |
|
Nonaccrual loans have been included with loans for the purpose of analyzing net interest earnings. |
|
(5) |
|
Net interest margin is computed by dividing annualized net interest income by total interest earning assets. |
|
(6) |
|
Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average rate earned on interest-earning assets and the average
rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. |
20
Reconcilement of Taxable Equivalent Net Interest Income
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
7,266 |
|
|
$ |
3,482 |
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
2,273 |
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
4,993 |
|
|
|
2,064 |
|
Tax equivalent adjustment |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
(fully taxable equivalent) |
|
$ |
5,144 |
|
|
$ |
2,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate/Volume Analysis
To enhance the understanding of the effects of volumes (the average balance of earning assets
and costing liabilities) and average interest rate fluctuations on the balance sheet as it pertains
to net interest income, the table below reflects these changes for 2009 versus 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 vs 2008 |
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
Due to |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Net |
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, tax-exempt |
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
90 |
|
Loans |
|
|
2,430 |
|
|
|
(280 |
) |
|
|
2,150 |
|
Taxable investment securities |
|
|
1,549 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
Tax-exempt investment securities |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
63 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
4,164 |
|
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
3,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
NOW deposits |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Money market deposits |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
827 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
Long-term borrowings, FHLB |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
Junior subordinate debentures |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net interest income |
|
$ |
2,889 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
2,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
2009 vs. 2008
The provision for loan losses is based upon managements quarterly review of the loan
portfolio. The purpose of the review is to assess loan quality, identify impaired loans, analyze
delinquencies, evaluate potential charge-offs and recoveries, and assess the general conditions in
the markets served. Management remains committed to an aggressive and thorough program of problem
loan identification and resolution. Periodically, an independent loan review is performed for the
Bank. The allowance for loan losses is evaluated quarterly and is calculated by applying historic
loss factors to the various outstanding loans types while excluding loans for which a specific
allowance has already been determined. Loss factors are based on managements consideration of the
nature of the portfolio segments, historical loan loss experience, industry standards and trends
with respect to nonperforming loans, and its core knowledge and experience with specific loan
segments.
Although management believes that it uses the best information available to make such
determinations and that the allowance for loan losses is adequate at March 31, 2009, future
adjustments could be necessary if circumstances or economic conditions differ substantially from
the assumptions used in making the initial determinations. A downturn in the local economy or
employment and delays in receiving financial information from borrowers could result in increased
levels of nonperforming assets and charge-offs, increased loan loss provisions and reductions in
interest income. Also, as part of the examination process, bank regulatory agencies periodically
review the Banks loan loss allowance. The bank regulators could require the recognition of
additions to the loan loss allowance based on their judgment of information available to them at
the time of their examination.
The provision for loan losses amounted to $60,000 and $0 for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. Management concluded the increase of the provision was appropriate
considering the gross loan growth experience of $4,982,000, increases in nonperforming assets, and
the general downturn in the national economy. Utilizing the resources noted above, management
concluded that the allowance for loan losses remains at a level adequate to provide for probable
losses inherent in the loan portfolio.
NON-INTEREST INCOME
2009 vs. 2008
Total non-interest income increased $666 thousand or 133.2 percent to $1.2 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2009. The increase primarily resulted from the acquisition of CFC as
described in Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of
this Form 10-Q. The service charges and fees increased $159,000 or 66.5 percent to $398,000 for
the three months ended March 31, 2009. Gain on sale of loans increased $49,000 or 104.3 percent
from $47,000 in 2008 to $96,000 in 2009. Brokerage income increased $18,000 or 47.4 percent from
$38,000 in 2008 to $56,000 in 2009. Trust income increased $114,000 or 300.0 percent from $38,000
in 2008 to $152,000 in 2009. Other income increased $288,000 from $73,000 in 2008 to $361,000 in
2009 as a result of a $68,000 gain recorded on the sale of the Main street facility as well as
increased ATM transaction revenue and related surcharges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For The Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Change |
(In Thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
% Total |
|
Amount |
|
% Total |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges and fees |
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
|
34.1 |
% |
|
$ |
239 |
|
|
|
47.8 |
% |
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
|
66.5 |
% |
Gain on sale of loans |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
104.3 |
|
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
58.5 |
|
Brokerage and insurance |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
Trust |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
300.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
394.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
1,166 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
666 |
|
|
|
133.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
2009 vs. 2008
Total non-interest expense increased $2.3 million or 133.5% from $1.7 million in 2008 to $4.0
million in 2009. The increases primarily resulted from the acquisition of CFC as described in Note
6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included
in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. Salaries and employee benefits increased $1.1 million or 110.1
percent for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Professional fees increased $101,000 or 153.0
percent from $66,000 in 2008 to $167,000 in 2009. Other expenses, Occupancy, Furniture and
Equipment, Professional fees, and Directors fees all experienced net increases as a result of the
CFC acquisition.
22
One standard to measure non-interest expense is to express annualized non-interest expense as
a percentage of average total assets. As of March 31, 2009 this percentage was 2.79 percent
compared to 2.73 percent in 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For The Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Change |
(In Thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
% Total |
|
Amount |
|
% Total |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
$ |
1,601 |
|
|
|
40.3 |
% |
|
$ |
703 |
|
|
|
41.4 |
% |
|
$ |
898 |
|
|
|
127.7 |
% |
Employee benefits |
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
77.1 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
122.5 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
180.9 |
|
State shares tax |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
68.2 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
153.0 |
|
Directors fees |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
54.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
922 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
206.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
$ |
3,968 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,699 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,269 |
|
|
|
133.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Our consolidated assets at March 31, 2009 were $569.5 million which represented an increase of
$1.2 million from $568.3 million at December 31, 2008.
Loans increased 1.6 percent from $320.1 million at December 31, 2008 to $325.1 million at
March 31, 2009.
The loan-to-deposit ratio is a key measurement of liquidity. Our loan-to-deposit ratio
decreased during 2009 to 72.7 percent compared to 73.7 percent at December 31, 2008.
INVESTMENTS
All of our securities are available-for-sale and are carried at estimated fair value.
Available-for-sale securities are reported on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value with an
offsetting adjustment to deferred taxes. The possibility of material price volatility in a changing
interest rate environment is offset by the availability to the bank of restructuring the portfolio
for gap positioning at any time through the securities classed as available-for-sale. The impact of
the fair value accounting was an unrealized gain, net of tax, on March 31, 2009 of $1,646,000
compared to an unrealized gain, net of tax, on December 31, 2008 of $1,622,000, which represents an
unrealized gain, net of tax, of $24,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The following
table shows the amortized cost and estimated fair value of the investment securities as of the
dates shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
Obligation of U.S.Government Corporations
and Agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
$ |
126,521 |
|
|
$ |
129,123 |
|
Other |
|
|
52,112 |
|
|
|
52,923 |
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
|
|
10,313 |
|
|
|
10,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
|
188,946 |
|
|
|
192,446 |
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
2,623 |
|
|
|
1,617 |
|
Restricted equity securities |
|
|
2,984 |
|
|
|
2,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities AFS |
|
$ |
194,553 |
|
|
$ |
197,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
Obligation of U.S.Government Corporations
and Agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
$ |
116,357 |
|
|
$ |
118,046 |
|
Other |
|
|
63,031 |
|
|
|
64,080 |
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
|
|
9,944 |
|
|
|
9,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
|
189,332 |
|
|
|
192,120 |
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
2,623 |
|
|
|
2,293 |
|
Restricted equity securities |
|
|
2,167 |
|
|
|
2,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities AFS |
|
$ |
194,122 |
|
|
$ |
196,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOANS
The loan portfolio increased 1.6 percent from $320.1 million at December 31, 2008 to $325.1
million at March 31, 2009. The percentage distribution in the loan portfolio was 83.5 percent in
real estate loans at $271.5 million; 8.0 percent in commercial loans at $26.0 million; 2.4 percent
in consumer loans at $7.9 million; and 6.0 percent in tax exempt loans at $19.6 million.
The following table presents the breakdown of loans by type as of the date indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
(In Thousands) |
|
3/31/2009 |
|
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
$ |
25,990 |
|
|
$ |
27,165 |
|
|
$ |
(1,175 |
) |
|
|
(4.3) |
% |
Tax-exempt |
|
|
19,589 |
|
|
|
16,762 |
|
|
|
2,827 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
263,998 |
|
|
|
262,539 |
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
7,507 |
|
|
|
5,307 |
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
Installment loans to individuals |
|
|
7,899 |
|
|
|
8,202 |
|
|
|
(303 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
Add (deduct): Unearned discount |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
Unamortized loan costs, net of fees |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(24.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans |
|
$ |
325,050 |
|
|
$ |
320,068 |
|
|
$ |
4,982 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the percentage distribution of loans by category as of the date
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/31/2009 |
|
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
Tax-exempt |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
81.2 |
|
|
|
82.1 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Installment loans to individuals |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The allowance for loan losses was $3.8 million at March 31, 2009, compared to $1.4 million at
March 31, 2008. This allowance equaled 1.16 percent and .90 percent of total loans, net of
unearned income, as of March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. An increase of $1.7 million resulted
from the acquisition of CFC as described in Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. The loan loss reserve is analyzed quarterly and
reviewed by the Banks Board of Directors. The assessment of the loan policies and procedures
during 2009 revealed no anticipated loss on any loans considered significant. No concentration
or apparent deterioration in classes of loans or pledged collateral was evident. Semi-monthly loan
meetings with the Banks Director Loan Committee reviewed new loans. Delinquent loans, loan
exceptions and certain large loans are addressed by the full Board no less than monthly to
determine compliance with policies. Allowance for loan losses was considered adequate based on
delinquency trends and actual loans written as it relates to the loan portfolio.
24
The following table presents a summary of the Banks loan loss experience as of the dates
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Average Loans Outstanding during
the period |
|
$ |
323,746 |
|
|
$ |
160,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
3,758 |
|
|
$ |
1,437 |
|
Provision charged to operations |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged off: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Real estate mortgages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Installment loans to indiviuals |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate mortgages |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Installment loans to indiviuals |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, |
|
$ |
3,753 |
|
|
$ |
1,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs to Average loans
outstanding during the period |
|
|
-0.02 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-PERFORMING LOANS
As of March 31, 2009, loans 30-89 days past due totaled $2.6 million compared to $1.6 million
at December 31, 2008. There were no 90-days past due loans that were not classified as non-accrual
at March 31, 2009 or December 31, 2008.. Non-accrual loans totaled $4.5 million at March 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008. Overall, past due and non-accrual loans increased $987 thousand to $7.0
million at March 31, 2009 from $6.1 million at December 31, 2008
The following table presents past due and non-accrual loans by loan type and in summary as of
the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days 30-89 |
|
$ |
769 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
Days 90 plus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual |
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days 30-89 |
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
|
1,528 |
|
Days 90 plus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual |
|
|
3,860 |
|
|
|
3,780 |
|
Installment loans to individuals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days 30-89 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Days 90 plus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,038 |
|
|
$ |
6,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days 30-89 |
|
$ |
2,575 |
|
|
$ |
1,598 |
|
Days 90 plus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual |
|
|
4,463 |
|
|
|
4,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,038 |
|
|
$ |
6,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructured loans still accruing |
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned |
|
$ |
670 |
|
|
$ |
373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
DEPOSITS
Total deposits increased by 3.0 percent from $434.3 million at December 31, 2008 to $447.2
million at March 31, 2009. Savings deposits increased 3.6 percent to $56.7 million at March 31,
2009 from $54.7 million at December 31, 2008. Money market deposits increased 26.9 percent to
$47.1 million as of March 31, 2009 from $37.1 million as of December 31, 2008. Interest bearing
NOW accounts increased 3.9 percent from $63.8 million at December 31, 2008 to $66.3 million at
March 31, 2009.
The actual balances and average rate paid on deposits are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Change |
(In Thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Rate |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
50,857 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
52,460 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
(1,603 |
) |
|
|
(3.1) |
% |
Savings |
|
|
56,673 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
54,717 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
1,956 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
Now deposits |
|
|
66,286 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
63,776 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
2,510 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Money market deposits |
|
|
47,090 |
|
|
|
1.22 |
|
|
|
37,120 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
|
9,970 |
|
|
|
26.9 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
226,342 |
|
|
|
3.22 |
|
|
|
226,236 |
|
|
|
3.53 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
447,248 |
|
|
|
1.83 |
% |
|
$ |
434,309 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
% |
|
$ |
12,939 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BORROWED FUNDS
Short-term borrowings, including securities sold under agreements to repurchase and day-to-day
FHLB Pittsburgh borrowings decreased 19.5 percent from $69.2 million at December 31, 2008 to
$55.7 million at March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Change |
|
|
Amount |
|
% Total |
|
Amount |
|
% Total |
|
Amount |
|
% |
Short-term borrowings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB repurchase agreements |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Short-term borrowings, FHLB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase |
|
|
41,939 |
|
|
|
75.3 |
|
|
|
55,462 |
|
|
|
80.1 |
|
|
|
(13,523 |
) |
|
|
(24.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term borrowings |
|
|
41,939 |
|
|
|
75.3 |
% |
|
|
55,462 |
|
|
|
80.1 |
% |
|
|
(13,523 |
) |
|
|
(24.4 |
) |
Junior subordinate debentures |
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term borrowings, FHLB |
|
|
9,131 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
9,133 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowed funds |
|
$ |
55,710 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
69,235 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
(13,525 |
) |
|
|
(19.5) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIQUIDITY
Liquidity management is required to ensure that adequate funds will be available to meet
anticipated and unanticipated deposit withdrawals, debt service payments, investment commitments,
commercial and consumer loan demand, and ongoing operating expenses. Funding sources include
principal repayments on loans, sales of assets, growth in core deposits, short and long-term
borrowings, investment securities coming due, loan prepayments and repurchase agreements. Regular
loan payments are a dependable source of funds, while the sale of investment securities, deposit
growth and loan prepayments are significantly influenced by general economic conditions and the
level of interest rates.
We manage liquidity on a daily basis. We believe that our liquidity is sufficient to meet
present and future financial obligations and commitments on a timely basis.
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Capital continues to be a strength for the Bank. Capital is critical as it must provide
growth, payment to shareholders, and absorption of unforeseen losses. The federal regulators
provide standards that must be met.
As of March 31, 2009, the Bank was categorized as well-capitalized under the regulatory
framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well-capitalized, the Bank must
maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios.
Our actual consolidated capital amounts and ratios as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
are in the following table:
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
(In Thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
Total Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(to Risk-weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
$ |
56,463 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
$ |
55,851 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
% |
For Capital Adequacy Purposes |
|
|
26,024 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
27,112 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
To Be Well-Capitalized |
|
|
32,529 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
33,890 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(to Risk-weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
$ |
52,700 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
$ |
52,083 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
% |
For Capital Adequacy Purposes |
|
|
13,012 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
13,556 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
To Be Well-Capitalized |
|
|
19,518 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
20,334 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(to Average Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
$ |
52,700 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
$ |
52,083 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
For Capital Adequacy Purposes |
|
|
22,336 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
22,476 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
To Be Well-Capitalized |
|
|
27,920 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
28,095 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Our capital ratios are not materially different from those of the Bank.
INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT
Interest rate risk management involves managing the extent to which interest-sensitive assets
and interest-sensitive liabilities are matched. Interest rate sensitivity is the relationship
between market interest rates and earnings volatility due to the repricing characteristics of
assets and liabilities. The Banks net interest income is affected by changes in the level of
market interest rates. In order to maintain consistent earnings performance, the Bank seeks to
manage, to the extent possible, the repricing characteristics of its assets and liabilities.
One major objective of the Bank when managing the rate sensitivity of its assets and
liabilities is to stabilize net interest income. The management of and authority to assume
interest rate risk is the responsibility of the Banks Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO), which is
comprised of senior management and Board members. ALCO meets quarterly to monitor the ratio of
interest sensitive assets to interest sensitive liabilities. The process to review interest rate
risk management is a regular part of management of the Bank. Consistent policies and practices of
measuring and reporting interest rate risk exposure, particularly regarding the treatment of
noncontractual assets and liabilities, are in effect. In addition, there is an annual process to
review the interest rate risk policy with the Board of Directors which includes limits on the
impact to earnings from shifts in interest rates.
The ratio between assets and liabilities repricing in specific time intervals is referred to
as an interest rate sensitivity gap. Interest rate sensitivity gaps can be managed to take
advantage of the slope of the yield curve as well as forecasted changes in the level of interest
rate changes.
To manage the interest sensitivity position, an asset/liability model called gap analysis is
used to monitor the difference in the volume of the Banks interest sensitive assets and
liabilities that mature or reprice within given periods. A positive gap (asset sensitive)
indicates that more assets reprice during a given period compared to liabilities, while a negative
gap (liability sensitive) has the opposite effect. The Bank employs computerized net interest
income simulation modeling to assist in quantifying interest rate risk exposure. This process
measures and quantifies the impact on net interest income through varying interest rate changes and
balance sheet compositions. The use of this model assists the ALCO to gauge the effects of the
interest rate changes on interest sensitive assets and liabilities in order to determine what
impact these rate changes will have upon our net interest spread.
At March 31, 2009, our cumulative gap positions and the potential earnings change resulting
from a 200 basis point change in rates were within the internal risk management guidelines.
In addition to gap analysis, the Bank uses earnings simulation to assist in measuring and
controlling interest rate risk. The Bank also simulates the impact on net interest income of plus
and minus 100, 200 and 300 basis point rate shocks. The results of these theoretical rate shocks
provide an additional tool to help manage the Banks interest rate risk.
It is our opinion that the asset/liability mix and the interest rate risk associated with the
balance sheet is within manageable parameters. Constant monitoring using asset/liability reports
and interest rate risk scenarios are in place along with quarterly
27
asset/liability management
meetings on the committee level by the Banks Board of Directors. Additionally, the Banks
Asset/Liability Committee meets quarterly with an investment consultant.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
In the normal course of conducting business activities, the Corporation is exposed to market
risk, principally interest rate risk, through the operations of its banking subsidiary. Interest
rate risk arises from market driven fluctuations in interest rates that affect cash flows, income,
expense and values of financial instruments and was discussed previously in this Form 10-Q.
No material changes in market risk occurred during the current period. A detailed discussion
of market risk is provided in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2008.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a 15(e) and 15d 15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), based on their evaluation of these controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Report, were effective as of such date at
the reasonable assurance level as discussed below to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports we file under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and
forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls and
internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of
the system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of
controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any,
within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that
judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error
or mistake. In addition, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by
collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls.
The CEO and CFO have evaluated the changes to our internal controls over financial reporting
that occurred during our fiscal Quarter Ended March 31, 2009, as required by paragraph (d) Rules
13a 15 and 15d 15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and have concluded
that there were no changes that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Management and the Corporations legal counsel are not aware of any litigation that would have
a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position of the Corporation. There are no
proceedings pending other than the ordinary routine litigation incident to the business of the
Corporation and its subsidiary, First Columbia Bank & Trust Co.. In addition, no material
proceedings are pending or are known to be threatened or contemplated against the Corporation and
the Bank by government authorities.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1.A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008, which could materially affect our business, financial condition
or future results. At March 31, 2009 the risk factors of the Corporation have not changed
materially from those in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. However, the risks described in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks that we face. Additional risks and uncertainties
not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely
affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
28
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
CCFNB BANCORP, INC.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NUMBER OF SHARES |
|
NUMBER OF SHARES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PURCHASED AS PART OF |
|
THAT MAY YET BE |
|
|
NUMBER OF SHARES |
|
|
|
|
|
PUBLICLY ANNOUNCED |
|
PURCHASED UNDER THE |
PERIOD |
|
PURCHASED |
|
PRICE PAID PER SHARE |
|
PROGRAM (1) |
|
PROGRAM |
01/01/09 - 01/31/09 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
02/01/09 - 02/28/09 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
03/01/09 - 03/31/09 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This program was announced in 2009 and represents the third buy-back program. The
Board of Directors approved the purchase of 200,000 shares. There was no expiration date
associated with this program. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5. Other Information
On March 30, 2009 the Bank entered into a sales agreement to sell a former branch facility
located at 1016 W. Front Street, Berwick, PA for a price of $205,000.
On May 4, 2009 the Bank entered into a sales agreement to sell a former branch facility
located at 4242 Old Berwick Road, Bloomsburg, PA for a price of $187,500.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
29
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCFNB BANCORP, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Lance O. Diehl
|
|
|
|
Lance O. Diehl |
|
|
|
President and CEO |
|
|
|
Date: May 12, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Jeffrey T. Arnold
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey T. Arnold, CPA, CIA |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
Date: May 12, 2009 |
|
30