---

---

Activist shareholder fires back at Five Star

BY:  Matt Glynn

Activist shareholder Johnny Guerry lashed out at leaders of Five Star Bank’s parent company over how they rebuffed his interest in a board seat and made a counteroffer to avoid a proxy fight.

Guerry, 34, managing partner of Texas-based Clover Partners, and Terry Philen, a Texas businessman, are seeking seats on Financial Institutions’ board, challenging the Warsaw-based bank’s preferred candidates. Four seats on the 11-member board are up for election at the annual shareholders meeting, set for June 3. The bank is urging its shareholders not to vote for Guerry and Philen.

In a letter to Martin K. Birmingham, Financial Institutions’ president and CEO, Guerry criticized how the bank handled his effort to join the board and said he and Philen would benefit Financial Institutions by serving as directors. Guerry caused a stir in a December letter in which he called for the bank to stop making acquisitions and put itself up for sale.

Guerry said he had previously talked to the bank about nominating him as an additional director for election, which would involve expanding the board by one seat. None of the board’s “handpicked” directors would have lost their seats.

Instead, he said, the board rejected his candidacy in late March after an “exhaustive six-week process.” He said the nominating committee “settled on the reasoning that in December of 2015 I made a statement that a sale of the bank might be in the best interest of shareholders.”

“They believed that this statement could scare off customers should I be added to the board,” he wrote. “It is ridiculous that your committee spent six weeks evaluating my candidacy only to arrive at such a feeble reason.”

Guerry said if the committee felt that was a legitimate concern, “it should have been contemplated before the process even started, and the entire evaluation process appears to be nothing more than a disingenuous attempt to make shareholders believe (Financial Institutions) went through a good-faith vetting process.”

Financial Institutions declined to comment on Guerry’s letter.

The bank in an April 8 regulatory filing said it considered Guerry for a seat but determined he lacked the qualifications, citing his lack of experience working for a bank and his limited public company board experience. Guerry said that was the first time he had heard the bank raise those concerns, and he questioned why the nominating committee took so long to reject his candidacy if it felt he was unqualified. He suggested the bank may have dragged out the process while it gauged other large shareholders’ support for the bank’s current strategy.

Guerry questioned whether the bank held its own four candidates of choice to the same standard for qualifications. For instance, he said a bank-supported nominee to fill an upcoming vacancy, Kim VanGelder, “appears to have zero bank or public company board experience, and her operating company history has been with Eastman Kodak,” which he noted filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Kodak has since emerged from bankruptcy.

Guerry defended his credentials, saying his firm has solely invested in banks for the past 12 years, and that he had served on the board of a public bank, Hampden Bancorp. He has criticized two significant acquisitions Financial Institutions made: the Amherst-based Scott Danahy Naylon insurance agency and Courier Capital Partners. He claimed the two deals diluted shareholder value, and their earn-back periods were far too long.

Guerry and Philen were nominated for board seats by MHC Mutual Conversion Fund Group, which is affiliated with Clover. After their names were submitted, Financial Institutions floated a compromise to Guerry: appointing to the board a director mutually who was acceptable to both the bank and MHC, but who didn’t have a relationship with either.

Guerry said he believed that was a “feigned attempt” to avoid a proxy fight, and rejected the bank’s idea that the person chosen for the board “must share the current board’s focus on the ‘long-term.’” Such a stipulation, he said, would narrow the list of possible choices. “We vehemently believe it is an independent and major shareholder’s point of view that is desperately needed in the boardroom.”

Three times in his letter, Guerry said his firm, Clover Partners, owned more Financial Institutions shares – nearly 796,000, representing about 5.5 percent of all shares – than all of the bank’s board members combined, to reinforce his point that his firm’s voice ought to be heard.

Guerry proposed his own compromise with the bank: “If (Financial Institutions) would like to avert a proxy contest, we would be prepared to discuss adding both of our candidates instead of seeking to replace any of the board’s handpicked nominees.”

Financial Institutions said Clover began accumulating shares in the bank on Aug. 11, 2015, with the purchase of 10,000 shares. Since then, the bank’s stock has risen 19 percent, closing at $28.30 on Thursday. Guerry contended some of that increase was spurred last December when Clover publicly called for the bank should stop making acquisitions and sell itself to a larger bank. Guerry said that was a sign that the market “views our involvement favorably,” noting that the KBW Nasdaq Bank index fell during the same time period.

In an interview, Guerry said both he and Philen plan to attend the June 3 meeting in Warsaw, and will launch their own effort to reach out to shareholders to support their election to the board.

“We have a high degree of confidence that we’re going to win,” he said.