UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted
by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[ ] Definitive Proxy Statement
[X] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12
HERCULES INCORPORATED
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement,
if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate
box):
[X] |
|
No fee required |
[ ] |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules
14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Title of each class of securities to which
transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which
transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of
transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount
on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
(5) Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ ] |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
[ ] |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided
by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting
fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No. |
|
|
|
|
|
(3) Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
(4) Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 14, 2003
Dear Fellow Shareholder:
We
want to let you know about two significant recent developments.
First,
Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), the nations leading independent proxy
voting advisor, has recommended that Hercules shareholders vote FOR
our director nominees and against Sam Heymans slate of dissidents.
Second,
Hercules recently announced that it expects fully diluted earnings per share
from ongoing operations for both the second quarter and full year 2003 to be
above consensus analyst estimates, reflecting our continuing progress in improving
the performance of your company.
ISS BACKS HERCULES DIRECTOR NOMINEES
ISS
is a respected independent firm that provides proxy advisory services to institutional
investors, mutual funds, and other fiduciaries. In preparing its recommendation,
ISS rigorously examines issues and the competing claims of the parties in a
proxy fight and meets with representatives of each side. In its recently issued
report, ISS recommended a vote FOR
our director nominees, stating:
|
Hercules has made
progress since the 2001 proxy fight. The companys balance sheet
has been significantly deleveraged, there are no liquidity concerns, and
the operating results have improved in 2002 and first quarter 2003, mainly
helped by the cost savings achieved.
|
|
. . . |
|
Given
the prevalent difficult conditions and liquidity concerns, ISS believes
that the company was justified in selling BetzDearborn water treatment
chemicals business, which enabled Hercules to significantly de-leverage
its balance sheet. |
|
. . . |
|
ISS
believes that dissidents have not met the burden of proof in terms of
a coherent transition plan and strategy to warrant control of the board,
especially given the companys improved operating performance. Accordingly,
we recommend a vote FOR the management nominees. |
According to ISS, Hercules ranks higher in corporate governance than more than 99% of all the companies in the S&P 500.
You
should also be aware that the Special Committee has approved amending Hercules
by-laws so that directors will be elected by plurality vote. The amendment to
the by-laws will be effective upon ratification of the Special Committees action
by the Board of Directors, which will occur prior to this years Annual Meeting.
OUR DIRECTOR NOMINEES ARE STRONG AND INDEPENDENT
|
|
• |
|
Patrick
Duff has strong shareholder credentials
and in-depth knowledge of investing from his experience as a senior managing
director of a major investment fund. Mr. Duff is a licensed Certified
Public Accountant and a Chartered Financial Analyst. |
|
|
• |
|
Thomas P. Gerrity is
a former Dean of the Wharton School, one of the nations leading business
schools, and former Chief Executive Officer of the Index Group, a leading
management consulting firm that he built. Dr. Gerrity is Chairman of the
Audit Committee of Sunoco, an S&P 500 company with over $14 billion
in annual revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
|
John K. Wulff will
bring extensive financial and accounting expertise to our Board. Mr. Wulff
served as a member of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
through June 2003, and was previously Chief Financial Officer of Union
Carbide and a partner of a major public accounting firm. If elected, Mr.
Wulff will serve as our Audit Committee financial expert.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
|
Joe B. Wyatt is
the former Chancellor and Chief Executive Officer of Vanderbilt University
with extensive experience in the areas of research and information systems.
Mr. Wyatt is Chairman of the Audit Committee of Ingram Micro, a New York
Stock Exchange company with over $20 billion in annual revenues.
|
OUR FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE CONTINUES TO IMPROVE
The
financial community has widely acknowledged that over the last two years the
people of Hercules have done an outstanding job to restore our Companys financial
and operational health. Our balance sheet is much stronger; sales and operating
profits from our ongoing businesses are growing strongly and are outpacing many
of our peers; our businesses are generating positive cash flows; and we now
have a solid foundation for growth and are creating many opportunities to increase
Hercules value.
On
July 10, 2003, Hercules management announced that it expects to report earnings
for the second quarter ended June 30, 2003, in the range of $0.27 to $0.29 per
fully diluted share. Earnings from ongoing operations* are
expected by Hercules management to be in the range of $0.21 to $0.23 per fully
diluted share, above the First Call consensus analyst estimate for ongoing operations
of $0.19 per fully diluted share. If market
conditions hold, Hercules management also expects to exceed First Calls consensus
estimate for full-year 2003 earnings from ongoing operations of $0.72 per fully
diluted share.
Hercules
management reported that improved earnings in the second quarter were driven
by higher sales, improved operating profits, and lower taxes in the quarter.
Net sales in the second quarter are expected by Hercules management to increase
approximately 8% compared to net sales of $437 million for the same period last
year. Net sales growth was driven largely by the Euros appreciation against
the U.S. dollar and also higher prices and higher volumes. Hercules
management also reported that year-to-date net sales are up approximately 9%
compared to the same period in 2002.
The
people of Hercules continue to deliver excellent results in a difficult environment.
Through their efforts, Hercules management reported that the Company is well
on its way to achieving its stated target of annual double-digit growth in earnings
and operating profits from ongoing operations.
HEYMAN SEEKS CONTROL OF YOUR COMPANY —
AND OFFERS YOU
NO CONTROL PREMIUM IN RETURN
In
asking you to turn over control of
your company to him, Heyman is not offering
to pay you any control premium — nor has he offered a coherent
business plan, other than a promise to replace current management despite the
excellent progress Hercules has made. Instead,
he has repeatedly criticized well-regarded strategic decisions, attacked management
and been disruptive in the boardroom as we continue down our proven path to
strengthen your company and deliver increased value to shareholders.
* |
|
Ongoing operations is a non-GAAP financial measure.
The ongoing operations include Pulp and Paper, Aqualon, FiberVisions and
Pinova. See Table 1. |
Heymans
goal to replace Bill Joyce is ill-advised. The Hercules Board selected Dr. Joyce
as CEO in 2001 on the basis of his distinguished career in the chemical industry,
his qualifications in turnaround situations, his ability to substantially grow
businesses and his proven track record of significantly increasing value for
shareholders. Our view is shared by many in the financial community, as evidenced
by the following comment from a well-respected chemical industry analyst:
|
Hercules
has the best CEO in the industry today, Bill Joyce, on two counts. First,
he did the best major deal, selling Union Carbide to Dow . . . .
Second, he has saved Hercules from what was otherwise likely to be a bad
end, in particular, by selling most of BetzDearborn to GE . . .
and cutting debt by $2 bn in a year and a half. If this had not been done,
as we said at the time, the company would have been run by and for the
banks, with the equity priced as a call on its survival. (Paul Christopherson,
New Vernon Associates, Inc. Rating Upgrade,
HERCULES (HPC — 8.03), Rating: 1-Strong Buy, February 28,
2003.)
|
The
people of Hercules have worked hard to turn your Company around —
and they have delivered outstanding results. Dont let Sam Heyman stop
the progress.
SUPPORT HERCULES' DIRECTOR NOMINEES BY VOTING
YOUR GOLD PROXY CARD TODAY
We
urge you to follow ISSs recommendation and continue the progress Hercules has
made by voting for our nominees using the enclosed GOLD
proxy card. Please return your signed and dated
GOLD proxy
card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope today.
If
you have previously signed a white proxy card sent to you by Heyman, you have
every right to change your vote. Simply sign, date and mail the enclosed GOLD
proxy card, which will automatically revoke any earlier-dated proxy cards that
you may have signed.
Thank you for your continued support.
Sincerely,
THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE OF
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF HERCULES INCORPORATED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard M. Fairbanks
|
|
Alan R. Hirsig |
|
Edith E. Holiday
(Chair) |
|
John C. Hunter,
III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert D. Kennedy
|
|
Jeffrey M. Lipton
|
|
Peter McCausland
|
|
Joe B. Wyatt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you have any questions or require assistance in voting your GOLD proxy
card,
please call MacKenzie Partners at the phone numbers listed below.
105 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10016
email: proxy@mackenziepartners.com
Call collect: (212) 929-5500
or
Toll Free: (800) 322-2885
|
Important Note:
This letter includes forward-looking statements,
as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended,
reflecting managements current analysis and expectations, based on what
management believes to be reasonable assumptions. Forward-looking statements
may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which
may cause the actual results to differ materially from those projected, stated
or implied, depending on such factors as: ability to generate cash, ability
to raise capital, ability to refinance, the result of the pursuit of strategic
alternatives, the outcome of the pending proxy contest, ability to execute work
process redesign and reduce costs, business climate, business performance, economic
and competitive uncertainties, higher manufacturing costs, reduced level of
customer orders, changes in strategies, risks in developing new products and
technologies, environmental and safety regulations and clean-up costs, foreign
exchange rates, the impact of changes in the value of pension fund assets and
liabilities, changes in generally accepted accounting principles, adverse legal
and regulatory developments, including increases in the number or financial
exposures of claims, lawsuits, settlements or judgments, or the inability to
eliminate or reduce such financial exposures by collecting indemnity payments
from insurers, the impact of increased accruals and reserves for such exposures,
and adverse changes in economic and political climates around the world, including
terrorist activities and international hostilities. Accordingly, there can be
no assurance that the Company will meet future results, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. As appropriate, additional
factors are contained in other reports filed by the Company with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. This paragraph is included to provide safe harbor for
forward-looking statements, which are not generally required to be publicly
revised as circumstances change, and which the Company does not intend to update.
Table 1
Reconciliation to Ongoing
Operations
June 30, 2003
|
THREE
MONTHS
ENDED
JUNE 30, 2003 |
|
DILUTED
EPS |
Expected |
$0.27-$0.29
|
Discontinued
operations |
(0.02)
|
Income
before discontinued operations |
$0.25-$0.27
|
Restructuring
costs |
(0.01)
|
Other
gains and losses, net, related to divested businesses |
0.02
|
Other |
0.01
|
Tax
benefit attributable to donation of intellectual property |
(0.06)
|
Ongoing
Operations(1) |
$0.21-$0.23
|
(1)
|
Ongoing operations is a non-GAAP
financial measure. The ongoing operations include Pulp and Paper, Aqualon,
FiberVisions and Pinova. |