Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
Or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
for the transition period from to |
Commission File No. 000-51728
AMERICAN RAILCAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
North Dakota
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
43-1481791
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
100 Clark Street, St. Charles, Missouri
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
63301
(Zip Code) |
(636) 940-6000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Nonaccelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the registrants common stock, without par value, outstanding on August 5,
2009 was 21,302,296 shares.
AMERICAN RAILCAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
2
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
282,617 |
|
|
$ |
291,788 |
|
Short-term investments available-for-sale securities |
|
|
45,472 |
|
|
|
2,565 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
23,423 |
|
|
|
39,725 |
|
Accounts receivable, due from affiliates |
|
|
15,060 |
|
|
|
10,283 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
63,016 |
|
|
|
97,245 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
4,325 |
|
|
|
5,314 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
2,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
435,286 |
|
|
|
449,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
205,444 |
|
|
|
206,936 |
|
Deferred debt issuance costs |
|
|
2,903 |
|
|
|
3,204 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
7,169 |
|
|
|
7,169 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Investments in joint ventures |
|
|
12,012 |
|
|
|
13,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
662,851 |
|
|
$ |
679,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
23,885 |
|
|
$ |
42,201 |
|
Accounts payable, due to affiliates |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
5,193 |
|
Accrued expenses and taxes |
|
|
6,195 |
|
|
|
7,758 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
8,177 |
|
|
|
10,413 |
|
Accrued interest expense |
|
|
6,906 |
|
|
|
6,907 |
|
Accrued dividends |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
46,445 |
|
|
|
73,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior unsecured notes |
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
275,000 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
7,482 |
|
|
|
4,683 |
|
Pension and post-retirement liabilities |
|
|
9,172 |
|
|
|
9,024 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
3,078 |
|
|
|
3,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
341,177 |
|
|
|
364,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares
authorized, 21,302,296 shares issued and outstanding
at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
239,617 |
|
|
|
239,617 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
82,615 |
|
|
|
80,035 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(771 |
) |
|
|
(5,140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
321,674 |
|
|
|
314,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
662,851 |
|
|
$ |
679,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing operations (including revenues
from affiliates of $37,354 and $53,756 for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively) |
|
$ |
94,608 |
|
|
$ |
190,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railcar services (including revenues from
affiliates of $4,452 and $4,172 for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively) |
|
|
15,318 |
|
|
|
13,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
109,926 |
|
|
|
204,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing operations |
|
|
(85,106 |
) |
|
|
(173,152 |
) |
Railcar services |
|
|
(12,011 |
) |
|
|
(10,718 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
(97,117 |
) |
|
|
(183,870 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
|
12,809 |
|
|
|
20,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, administrative and other (including
costs related to affiliates of $154 and $152 for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively) |
|
|
(5,661 |
) |
|
|
(6,153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
7,148 |
|
|
|
14,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (including income related to
affiliates of $5 and $9 for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively) |
|
|
1,802 |
|
|
|
1,705 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(5,136 |
) |
|
|
(5,048 |
) |
Other income (loss) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(1,463 |
) |
(Loss) earnings from joint ventures |
|
|
(1,971 |
) |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income tax expense |
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
|
9,749 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(3,517 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
1,132 |
|
|
$ |
6,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per common share basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
basic and diluted |
|
|
21,302 |
|
|
|
21,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing operations (including revenues
from affiliates of $85,759 and $88,445 for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively) |
|
$ |
239,278 |
|
|
$ |
361,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railcar services (including revenues from
affiliates of $7,985 and $8,225 for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively) |
|
|
27,595 |
|
|
|
26,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
266,873 |
|
|
|
388,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing operations |
|
|
(215,204 |
) |
|
|
(324,042 |
) |
Railcar services |
|
|
(22,483 |
) |
|
|
(21,585 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
(237,687 |
) |
|
|
(345,627 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
|
29,186 |
|
|
|
42,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, administrative and other (including
costs related to affiliates of $308 and $303 for
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively) |
|
|
(12,674 |
) |
|
|
(12,994 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
16,512 |
|
|
|
29,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (including income related to
affiliates of $10 and $20 for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively) |
|
|
2,985 |
|
|
|
4,262 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(10,276 |
) |
|
|
(10,091 |
) |
Other (loss) income |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
1,736 |
|
(Loss) earnings from joint ventures |
|
|
(2,813 |
) |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income tax expense |
|
|
6,325 |
|
|
|
26,217 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(2,467 |
) |
|
|
(9,857 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
3,858 |
|
|
$ |
16,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per common share basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
basic and diluted |
|
|
21,302 |
|
|
|
21,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
3,858 |
|
|
$ |
16,360 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
11,613 |
|
|
|
9,591 |
|
Amortization of deferred costs |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
Income related to the reversal of stock based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(411 |
) |
Change in investments in joint ventures as a result of loss (earnings) |
|
|
2,813 |
|
|
|
(400 |
) |
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
(620 |
) |
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,571 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts receivable |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Investing activities reclassified from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized loss on derivatives |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gain on sale of short-term
investments available-for-sale
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(930 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
16,318 |
|
|
|
(12,629 |
) |
Accounts receivable, due from affiliate |
|
|
(4,777 |
) |
|
|
(4,248 |
) |
Inventories, net |
|
|
34,247 |
|
|
|
(19,670 |
) |
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(18,291 |
) |
|
|
17,423 |
|
Accounts payable, due to affiliate |
|
|
(4,550 |
) |
|
|
1,221 |
|
Accrued expenses and taxes |
|
|
(3,893 |
) |
|
|
(3,974 |
) |
Other |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
40,739 |
|
|
|
3,713 |
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(10,004 |
) |
|
|
(24,211 |
) |
Purchases of short-term investments available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(36,841 |
) |
|
|
(27,857 |
) |
Sales of short-term investments available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,291 |
|
Realized loss on derivatives |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from repayment of note receivable from affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
329 |
|
Investments in joint ventures |
|
|
(1,845 |
) |
|
|
(461 |
) |
Sale of investment in joint venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,875 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(48,700 |
) |
|
|
(48,139 |
) |
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock dividends |
|
|
(1,278 |
) |
|
|
(1,278 |
) |
Finance fees related to new credit facility |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
Repayment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(1,318 |
) |
|
|
(1,326 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(9,171 |
) |
|
|
(45,751 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
291,788 |
|
|
|
303,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
282,617 |
|
|
$ |
258,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by American
Railcar Industries, Inc. (a North Dakota corporation as of June 30, 2009) and subsidiaries
(collectively the Company or ARI), without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain information and footnote disclosure normally
included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations,
although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented
not misleading. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2008 has been derived
from the audited consolidated balance sheets as of that date. These condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and
the notes thereto included in the Companys latest annual report attached on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008. In the opinion of management, the information contained herein reflects
all adjustments necessary to make the results of operations for the interim periods fairly stated.
The results of operations of any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that
may be expected for a fiscal year.
Note 1 Description of the Business
The condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of American
Railcar Industries, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Through its subsidiary, Castings, LLC
(Castings), the Company has a one-third ownership interest in Ohio Castings Company, LLC (Ohio
Castings), a limited liability company formed to produce various steel railcar parts for use or
sale by the ownership group. Through its subsidiary, ARI Component Venture, LLC (ARI Component),
the Company has a 39.7% ownership interest in Axis, LLC (Axis HoldCo), which in turn has a 100.0%
ownership interest in Axis Operating Company, LLC (Axis), a limited liability company formed to
produce railcar axles, for use or sale by the ownership group. Through its subsidiaries, American
Railcar Mauritius I and American Railcar Mauritius II, the Company has a 50.0% ownership interest
in Amtek Railcar Industries Private Limited (ARIPL), a joint venture company in India, which was
formed to produce railcars and railcar components in India for sale by the joint venture. Through
its wholly owned subsidiary, ARI Longtrain, Inc. (Longtrain), the Company makes investments from
time to time. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
ARI manufactures railcars, custom designed railcar parts and other industrial products, primarily
aluminum and special alloy steel castings. These products are sold to various types of companies
including leasing companies, railroads, industrial companies and other non-rail companies. ARI also
provides railcar maintenance services for railcar fleets, including that of its affiliate, American
Railcar Leasing LLC (ARL). In addition, ARI provides fleet management and maintenance services for
railcars owned by certain customers. Such services include inspecting and supervising the
maintenance and repair of such railcars. The Companys operations are located in the United States
and Canada. The Company operates a railcar repair facility in Sarnia, Ontario Canada. Canadian
revenues were 0.6% and 0.4% of total consolidated revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively. Canadian revenues were 0.5% and 0.5% of total consolidated revenues for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Canadian assets were 1.2% and 0.6% of total
consolidated assets as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Note 2 Summary of Accounting Policies
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications of prior year presentations that are of a normal recurring nature have
been made to conform to the 2009 presentation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141(R), Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141R), to create greater
consistency in the accounting and financial reporting of business combinations. SFAS No. 141R
establishes principles and
requirements for how the acquirer in a business combination (i) recognizes and measures in its
financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any controlling
interest, (ii) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain
from a bargain purchase, and (iii) determines what information to disclose to enable users of the
financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS
No. 141R applies to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this
pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Companys condensed consolidated financial
statements.
7
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statementsan amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of
a subsidiary. The guidance became effective as of the beginning of the Companys fiscal year on
January 1, 2009. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Companys
condensed consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 expands quarterly
disclosure requirements in SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
activities (SFAS No. 133), about an entitys derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS
No. 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of
this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Companys condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS No. 165). SFAS No. 165 requires
disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for
that date. SFAS No. 165 is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The
adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Companys condensed
consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS No.
167). SFAS No. 167 amends the accounting and disclosure requirements for variable interest entities
(VIE). SFAS No. 167 requires on-going assessments to determine the primary beneficiary of a VIE and
amends the primary beneficiary assessment and disclosure requirements. SFAS No. 167 is effective
for the first interim and annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009. The Company
has evaluated the impact of adopting this pronouncement and does not expect it to have a material
effect on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (SFAS
No. 168). SFAS No. 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the source of
authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for nongovernmental entities
effective for financial statements for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.
This SFAS also denotes the U.S. GAAP hierarchy will only include two levels: authoritative and
nonauthoritative. The Company has evaluated the impact of adopting this pronouncement and does not
expect it to have a material effect on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
Note 3 Short-term Investments Available-for-Sale Securities
During January 2008, Longtrain purchased approximately 1.5 million shares of common stock of The
Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (Greenbrier) in the open market. This investment was made with the
intention to enter into discussions regarding a possible business combination of the Company and
Greenbrier. In June 2008, it was disclosed that the parties were not at that time pursuing further
discussions regarding a business combination. Subsequently, Longtrain sold a majority of the
Greenbrier shares it owned. A realized gain of $0.9 million, before tax, was recorded during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008. The cost basis of the shares sold was determined through
specific identification. Additional shares were sold in the third quarter of 2008. This investment
is classified as a short-term investment available-for-sale security in accordance with SFAS No.
115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (SFAS No. 115), as the
Company does not intend on holding this investment long-term.
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the market values of the remaining approximately 0.4
million shares of Greenbrier owned by the Company were $2.7 million and $2.6 million, respectively.
The resulting unrealized losses
of $4.2 million and $4.3 million were recognized as accumulated other comprehensive loss within
stockholders equity, net of deferred taxes as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively.
8
The Company continuously assesses any investment that is in an unrealized loss position to
determine if an other-than-temporary impairment exists. Factors considered include but are not
limited to the following: the Companys ability and intent to hold the security until loss
recovery, the number of quarters in an unrealized loss position and other market conditions. Based
on the Companys review, an other-than-temporary impairment was not identified as of June 30, 2009.
During the first quarter of 2009, Longtrain purchased corporate bonds that mature in 2015 for a
total of $36.8 million. This investment is classified as a short-term investment available-for-sale
security in accordance with SFAS No. 115 as the Company does not intend on holding this investment
long-term. As of June 30, 2009, the value of these bonds was $42.8 million resulting in an
unrealized gain of $6.0 million that was recognized as accumulated other comprehensive income
within stockholders equity, net of deferred taxes.
Note 4 Derivatives
The Company has accounted for its derivative contracts under SFAS No. 133, which was amended by
SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities (SFAS
No. 138). The pronouncements established accounting and reporting standards for derivative
instruments and for hedging activities, which generally require recognition of all derivatives as
either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet at their fair value. The accounting for changes
in fair value depends on the intended use of the derivative and its resulting designation. The
Company did not use hedge accounting and accordingly, all unrealized gains and losses were
reflected in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Total return swaps
During January 2008, Longtrain entered into total return swap agreements referenced to the fair
value of approximately 0.4 million shares of common stock of Greenbrier. The total notional amount
of these swap agreements was approximately $7.4 million, representing the fair market value of the
referenced shares at the time Longtrain entered into the agreements. The Company accounted for
these swap agreements as derivatives with any resulting unrealized gain included in other income
with a derivative asset on the balance sheet or any resulting unrealized loss accounted for as
other loss with a derivative liability on the balance sheet. For the six months ended June 30,
2008, the Companys other income included $0.6 million of unrealized gain relating to these swap
agreements. These swap agreements were fully settled in the third quarter of 2008.
These swap agreements required that Longtrain maintain a cash deposit with the counterparty based
upon a percentage of the swap contracts notional value at the time of inception, which was
adjusted to reflect any associated unrealized gain. As of June 30, 2008, Longtrain had $3.1 million
of such deposits, reported as restricted cash to meet this requirement. As these agreements were
settled during 2008, there were no restricted cash deposits as of June 30, 2009 or December 31,
2008.
Foreign currency option
The Company entered into a foreign currency option in October 2008, to purchase Canadian Dollars
(CAD) for $5.3 million U.S. Dollars (USD) from October 2008 through April 2009, with fixed exchange
rates and exchange limits each month. This option was entered into to hedge our exposure to foreign
currency exchange risk related to capital expenditures for the expansion of the Companys Canadian
repair operations. In the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company expended $3.3 million USD to
purchase CAD under this option resulting in a realized gain of less than $0.1 million and a
realized loss of $0.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, based
on the exchange spot rate on the various exercise dates.
The Company did not use hedge accounting for this option, thus any resulting unrealized gain was
included in other income with a derivative asset on the balance sheet and any unrealized loss was
recorded in other loss with a derivative liability on the balance sheet. During the second quarter
of 2009, the final portion of the option was exercised, thus no unrealized gain/loss and derivative
asset/liability were recorded as of June 30, 2009. As of
December 31, 2008, an unrealized gain and derivative asset were recorded for $0.1 million.
9
Note 5 Fair Value Measurements
The Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157), on January 1, 2008,
which, among other things, requires enhanced disclosures about investments that are measured and
reported at fair value. SFAS No. 157 establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework that prioritizes
and ranks the level of market price observability used in measuring investments at fair value.
Market price observability is impacted by a number of factors, including the type of investment and
the characteristics specific to the investment. Investments with readily available active quoted
prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a
higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair
value.
As of January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the non-recurring nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities provisions of SFAS No. 157, including those measured at fair value in goodwill
impairment testing.
Investments measured and reported at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the
following categories:
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical investments as
of the reporting date. The type of investments included in Level 1 include listed
equities and listed derivatives. As required by SFAS No. 157, the Company does not
adjust the quoted price for these investments, even in situations where they hold a
large position and a sale could reasonably impact the quoted price. |
|
|
|
Level 2 Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are
either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date, and fair value is
determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies. Investments that
are generally included in this category include corporate bonds and loans, less liquid
and restricted equity securities and certain over-the-counter derivatives. |
|
|
|
Level 3 Pricing inputs are unobservable for the investment and include situations
where there is little, if any, market activity for the investment. The inputs into the
determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. |
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair
value hierarchy. In such cases, an investments level within the fair value hierarchy is based on
the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ARIs assessment of
the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires
judgment and considers factors specific to the investment.
The following table summarizes the valuation of our investments by the above SFAS No. 157 fair
value hierarchy levels as of June 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments -
available-for-sale
securities |
|
$ |
45,472 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
45,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,472 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
45,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
The following table summarizes the valuation of our investments by the above SFAS 157 fair value
hierarchy levels as of December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments -
available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
2,565 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,565 |
|
Derivative asset - foreign currency option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,565 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the valuation of financial instruments measured at fair value on a
non-recurring basis in the statement of financial position at both June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,169 |
|
|
$ |
7,169 |
|
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS No.
142), goodwill with a carrying amount of $7.2 million was evaluated as of March 1, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 and no impairment was noted. Refer to Note 8 for further discussion of the
goodwill fair value measurement and impairment tests.
Note 6 Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
36,028 |
|
|
$ |
59,457 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
14,872 |
|
|
|
22,137 |
|
Finished products |
|
|
14,721 |
|
|
|
18,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
|
65,621 |
|
|
|
99,894 |
|
Less reserves |
|
|
(2,605 |
) |
|
|
(2,649 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories, net |
|
$ |
63,016 |
|
|
$ |
97,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7 Property, Plant and Equipment
The following table summarizes the components of property, plant and equipment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings |
|
$ |
137,015 |
|
|
$ |
130,054 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
172,101 |
|
|
|
167,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309,116 |
|
|
|
297,640 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(115,710 |
) |
|
|
(105,938 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
193,406 |
|
|
|
191,702 |
|
Land |
|
|
3,306 |
|
|
|
3,306 |
|
Construction in process |
|
|
8,732 |
|
|
|
11,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
205,444 |
|
|
$ |
206,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation Expense
Depreciation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $6.0 million and $4.9
million, respectively. Depreciation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was
$11.6 million and $9.6 million, respectively.
11
Capitalized Interest
In conjunction with the Senior Unsecured Fixed Rate Notes offering described in Note 11, the
Company recorded capitalized interest on certain property, plant and equipment capital projects.
The Company also capitalized interest related to the investment in Axis in accordance with SFAS No.
34, Capitalization of Interest Cost (SFAS No. 34). The amount of interest capitalized for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The amount of
interest capitalized for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $0.6 million and $0.8
million, respectively.
Lease agreements
During 2008, the Company entered into two agreements to lease a fixed number of railcars to third
parties for multiple years. One of the leases includes a provision that allows the lessee to
purchase any portion of the leased railcars at any time during the lease term for a stated market
price, which approximates fair value. These agreements have been classified as operating leases in
accordance with SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases (SFAS No. 13). As a result of applying the rules
from SFAS No. 13, the leased railcars have been included in machinery and equipment and will be
depreciated in accordance with the Companys depreciation policy.
Note 8 Goodwill
SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives shall
not be amortized but shall be tested for impairment at least annually by comparing the fair value
of the asset to its carrying value. The Company has $7.2 million of goodwill related to the
acquisition of Custom Steel in 2006.
The Company performs the annual goodwill impairment test as of March 1 of each year. The valuation
uses a combination of methods to determine the fair value of the reporting unit including prices of
comparable businesses, a present value technique and recent transactions involving businesses
similar to the Company. There was no adjustment required based on the 2009 annual impairment test
of the goodwill generated from the Custom Steel acquisition.
In addition to the annual impairment test requirement, SFAS No. 142 also requires goodwill to be
tested for impairment anytime a triggering event occurs that could cause the goodwill value to
decrease. During the fourth quarter of 2008, there were severe disruptions in the credit markets
and reductions in global economic activity,
which had significant adverse impacts on stock markets and contributed to a significant decline in
the Companys stock price and corresponding market capitalization. For most of the fourth quarter,
the Companys market capitalization value was significantly below the recorded net book value of
the Companys balance sheet, including goodwill. Based on these overriding factors, as required
under SFAS No. 142, indicators existed that the Company had experienced a significant adverse
change in the business climate that the Company determined to be a triggering event requiring it to
review for impairment the fair value of the reporting unit associated with the Companys goodwill.
The results of the evaluation determined that no impairment existed at December 31, 2008.
Note 9 Investments in Joint Ventures
The Company is party to three joint ventures; Ohio Castings, Axis and ARIPL. The equity method is
used to account for the investments in Ohio Castings and Axis. Under the equity method, the Company
recognizes its share of the earnings and losses of the joint ventures as they accrue. Advances and
distributions are charged and credited directly to the investment accounts. Since inception, no
equity contributions have been made to ARIPL.
12
The carrying amount of investments in joint ventures is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Carrying amount of investments in joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio Castings |
|
$ |
5,827 |
|
|
$ |
7,000 |
|
Axis |
|
|
6,185 |
|
|
|
6,091 |
|
ARIPL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments in joint ventures |
|
$ |
12,012 |
|
|
$ |
13,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The maximum exposure to loss as a result of investments in joint ventures is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Maximum exposure to loss by joint venture |
|
|
|
|
Ohio Castings |
|
|
|
|
Investment |
|
$ |
5,827 |
|
Loan guarantee |
|
|
1,060 |
|
Note receivable |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Ohio Castings exposure |
|
|
7,381 |
|
Axis |
|
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
6,185 |
|
Loan guarantee |
|
|
31,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Axis exposure |
|
|
37,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
ARIPL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total exposure to loss due to joint ventures |
|
$ |
44,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio Castings
Ohio Castings produces railcar parts that are sold to one of the joint venture partners. The joint
venture partner sells these parts to outside third parties at current market prices and sells them
to the Company and the other joint venture partner at cost plus a licensing fee. The Company has
been involved with this joint venture since 2003. In June 2009, Ohio Castings idled its
manufacturing facility and advised the Company that it currently expects to restart production when
demand returns.
Ohio Castings performed an analysis of long-lived assets in accordance with SFAS No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No. 144). Based on this
analysis, Ohio Castings concluded that there was no impairment of their long-lived assets. As a
result, ARI determined there was no impairment of the investment in Ohio Castings. The Company and
Ohio Castings will continue to monitor for impairment as necessary.
Ohio Castings also has notes payable to ARI and the other two partners, with a current balance of
$0.5 million each, that come due during August 2009. Due to the idling of the facility, Ohio
Castings advised the partners that it is not able to repay the notes. The joint venture and all
three partners are evaluating the best course of action regarding the notes.
The Company has determined that, although the joint venture is a VIE, the Company is not the
primary beneficiary. The significant factor in this determination was that no partner, including
the Company and Castings, has rights to the majority of returns, losses or votes. Additionally, the
risk of loss to Castings and the Company is limited to its investment in the VIE, a note receivable
and Ohio Castings debt, which the Company has guaranteed. The two other partners of Ohio Castings
have made the same guarantees of these obligations.
13
The Company, along with the other members of Ohio Castings, has guaranteed bonds payable and a
state loan issued to one of Ohio Castings subsidiaries by the State of Ohio, as further discussed
in Note 14. The value of the
guarantee was less than $0.1 million at both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and has been
recorded by the Company in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others
(FIN 45). Because operations are currently idled, it is anticipated that Ohio Castings will
continue to make principal and interest payments on the bonds payable and state loan through
partner equity contributions, including additional contributions by the Company.
See Note 19 for information regarding financial transactions among the Company, Ohio Castings and
Castings.
Summary combined results of operations for Ohio Castings, the investee company are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Results of operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
2,564 |
|
|
$ |
24,590 |
|
|
$ |
10,866 |
|
|
$ |
46,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) earnings |
|
|
(2,777 |
) |
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
(3,578 |
) |
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) earnings |
|
$ |
(2,797 |
) |
|
$ |
1,003 |
|
|
$ |
(3,565 |
) |
|
$ |
2,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Axis
In June 2007, ARI, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into an agreement with another
partner to form a joint venture, Axis, to manufacture and sell railcar axles. In February 2008, the
two original partners sold equal equity interests in Axis to two new minority partners. ARI and the
other initial partner each had an ownership interest of 37.5%, after giving effect to the new
partners. Production has begun and the joint venture will cease classification as a development
stage enterprise in the third quarter of 2009 given that testing was finalized and certification
was obtained from the Association of American Railroads during the second quarter of 2009.
Under the terms of the joint venture agreement, ARI and the other initial partner are required, and
the other members are entitled, to contribute additional capital to the joint venture, on a pro
rata basis, of any amounts approved by the joint ventures executive committee, as and when called
by the executive committee. Further, until the seventh anniversary of completion of the axle
manufacturing facility, and subject to other terms, conditions and limitations of the joint venture
agreement, ARI and the other initial partner are also required, in the event production at the
facility has been curtailed, to contribute capital to the joint venture, on a pro rata basis, in
order to maintain adequate working capital.
During March 2009, the executive committee of Axis issued a capital call. The two minority partners
elected not to participate in this capital call and ARI and the other initial partner equally
contributed the necessary capital, which amounted to $1.6 million for each initial partner. The
capital contributions are utilized to provide working capital. The partners ownership percentages
have been adjusted accordingly. As a result, ARI and the other initial partners current ownership
interests have been adjusted to 39.7% each.
The Company has determined that, although the joint venture is a VIE, the Company is not the
primary beneficiary. The significant factor in this determination was that no partner, including
the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, has rights to the majority of returns, losses or
votes. The executive committee and board of directors of the joint venture is comprised of one
representative from each initial partner. Each representative has equal voting rights and equal
decision-making rights for operational and strategic decisions of the joint venture. Additionally,
the risk of loss to the Company and subsidiary is limited to its investment in the VIE and one-half
of Axis debt, which the Company has guaranteed, as further discussed in Note 14. The other initial
partner has guaranteed the other half of Axis debt. The value of the Companys guarantee of a
portion of the debt was accounted for in accordance with FIN 45, and was valued at $0.8 million and
$0.9 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
14
Effective as of June 30, 2009, Axis had approximately $62.2 million outstanding under its credit
agreement, of which 50.0% was guaranteed by the Company and 50.0% was guaranteed by the other
initial partner in the joint venture. Effective August 5, 2009, the Company and the other initial
partner acquired this loan, with each party acquiring a 50.0% interest in the loan. The purchase price paid by the Company for its 50.0%
interest in the loan was approximately $29.5 million, which equaled the then outstanding principal
amount of the portion of the loan acquired by the Company. See Note 22 for further information
regarding this transaction and the terms of the underlying loan.
See Notes 19 and 22 for information regarding financial transactions among the Company, ARI
Component and Axis.
Summary combined financial results for Axis, the investee company, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Financial Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before interest |
|
|
(2,077 |
) |
|
|
(325 |
) |
|
|
(3,716 |
) |
|
|
(475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(2,358 |
) |
|
$ |
(702 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,268 |
) |
|
$ |
(998 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARIPL
In June 2008, the Company, through a wholly owned subsidiary, entered into an agreement with a
partner in India to form a joint venture company to manufacture, sell and supply freight railcars
and their components in India and other countries to be agreed upon at a facility to be constructed
in India by the joint venture. The joint venture is owned 50.0% by both partners and each partner
has agreed to make limited, equal capital contributions to the joint venture. As of June 30, 2009,
no equity investment had been made since the inception of the joint venture.
Note 10 Warranties
The Company provides limited warranties on certain products for periods ranging from one year for
parts and services to five years on new railcars. Factors affecting the Companys warranty
liability include the number of units sold and historical and anticipated rates of claims and costs
per claim. Fluctuations in the Companys warranty provision and experience of warranty claims are
the result of variations in these factors. The Company assesses the adequacy of its warranty
liability based on changes in these factors.
The overall change in the Companys warranty reserve, including the aforementioned reduction, is
reflected in the condensed consolidated balance sheet in accrued expenses and taxes and is detailed
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Liability, beginning of period |
|
$ |
1,963 |
|
|
$ |
2,051 |
|
|
$ |
2,595 |
|
|
$ |
2,503 |
|
Provision for new
warranties issued, net of
adjustments |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
Warranty claims |
|
|
(530 |
) |
|
|
(477 |
) |
|
|
(1,287 |
) |
|
|
(586 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability, end of period |
|
$ |
1,591 |
|
|
$ |
2,300 |
|
|
$ |
1,591 |
|
|
$ |
2,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Note 11 Long-term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2009 |
|
|
December 31,
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revolving line of credit |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Senior unsecured notes |
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt, including current
portion |
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
Less current portion of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt, net of current portion |
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving line of credit
The Company has an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement in place, providing for the terms of the
Companys revolving credit facility with Capital One Leverage Finance Corporation, as
administrative agent for various lenders. The Company had no borrowings outstanding as of June 30,
2009 and has had no borrowings outstanding under this revolving credit facility since its inception
in January 2006. The note bears interest at various rates based on LIBOR or prime. As of June 30,
2009, the interest rate on the revolving credit facility was 2.75% based on the U.S. prime rate at
that time.
The revolving credit facility expires on October 5, 2009, and provided commercially favorable terms
are available, the Company currently plans on entering into a new agreement before or upon
expiration.
The revolving credit facility has both affirmative and negative covenants as defined in the
agreement, including, without limitation, an adjusted fixed charge coverage ratio (coverage ratio),
a maximum total debt leverage ratio (leverage ratio) and limitations on capital expenditures and
dividends. These negative covenants include certain limitations on, among other things, the
Companys ability to incur or maintain indebtedness, sell or dispose of collateral, grant credit
and declare or pay dividends or make distributions on common stock or other equity securities. The
revolving credit facility has a total commitment of the lesser of (i) $100.0 million or (ii) an
amount equal to a percentage of eligible accounts receivable plus a percentage of eligible raw
materials, work in process and finished goods inventory. In addition, the revolving credit facility
includes a capital expenditure sub-facility of $30.0 million based on the percentage of the costs
related to equipment the Company may acquire. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility are
collateralized by accounts receivable, contracts, leases, instruments, chattel paper, inventory,
pledged accounts, certain other assets and equipment purchased with proceeds of the capital
expenditure sub-facility.
Compliance with the coverage and leverage ratios is not required unless the Companys excess
availability under the revolving credit facility is less than $30.0 million (or has been less than
$30.0 million at any time during the prior 90 days). Under this circumstance, the Companys
coverage ratio must not be less than 1.2 to 1.0 on a quarterly and annual basis. Under this
circumstance and if the Company has incurred debt during the quarter, the leverage ratio must not
be greater than 4.0 to 1.0 on a quarterly and annual basis. At June 30, 2009, the Company had $50.6
million of availability under the revolving credit facility and was not required to test the
coverage and leverage ratios. The Company has declared quarterly dividends of $0.03 per common
share since its initial public offering in January 2006 through the second quarter of 2009, and
none of those declarations has breached any covenants in the revolving credit agreement.
Senior unsecured fixed rate notes
In February 2007, the Company completed the offering of $275.0 million senior unsecured fixed rate
notes, which were subsequently exchanged for registered notes in March 2007. The fair value of
these notes was approximately $250.8 million at June 30, 2009 based on the closing market price as
of that date which is a Level 1 input. For
definition and discussion of a Level 1 input for fair value measurement, refer to Note 5.
16
The notes bear a fixed interest rate that is set at 7.5% and are due in 2014. Interest on the notes
is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 1 and September 1. The terms of the notes contain
restrictive covenants that limit the Companys ability to, among other things, incur additional
debt, make certain restricted payments and enter into certain significant transactions with
shareholders and affiliates. These covenants become more restrictive if the Companys fixed charge
coverage ratio, as defined, is less than 2.0 to 1.0. The Company was in compliance with all of its
covenants under the notes as of June 30, 2009.
ARI may redeem up to 35.0% of the Notes, prior to or on March 1, 2010, at a redemption price of
107.5% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest with money that the Company
raises from one or more qualified equity offerings. Prior to March 1, 2011, the notes may be
redeemed in whole or in part using cash from operations at a redemption price equal to 100.0% of
the applicable principal amount, plus an applicable premium as defined in the notes agreement.
Commencing on March 1, 2011, the redemption price is set at 103.8% of the principal amount of the
Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, and declines annually until it is reduced to 100.0% of the
principal amount of the Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest from and after March 1, 2013.
Note 12 Income Taxes
Unrecognized tax benefits for the Company are $2.1 million as of June 30, 2009. There is a
reasonable possibility that amounts of unrecognized tax benefits totaling $1.7 million,
attributable to accounting methods and state tax positions, could significantly decrease over the
next twelve months due to a lapse in statutes for assessing tax and/or a change in uncertain tax
positions. Such a change is estimated to be in the range of $1.0 million to $1.5 million.
The Companys tax years 2005 through 2008 remain open to examination by various authorities with
the latest expiration of statute in 2012.
Note 13 Employee Benefit Plans
The Company is the sponsor of two defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees at
designated repair facilities. One plan, which covers certain salaried and hourly employees, is
frozen and no additional benefits are accruing thereunder. The second plan, which covers only
certain of the Companys union employees, is active and benefits continue to accrue thereunder. The
assets of all funded plans are held by independent trustees and consist primarily of equity and
fixed income securities. The Company is also the sponsor of an unfunded, non-qualified supplemental
executive retirement plan (SERP) in which several of its employees are participants. The SERP is
frozen and no additional benefits are accruing thereunder.
The Company also provides postretirement healthcare benefits for certain of its salaried and hourly
retired employees. Employees may become eligible for healthcare benefits if they retire after
attaining specified age and service requirements. These benefits are subject to deductibles,
co-payment provisions and other limitations.
As required under SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans (an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)) (SFAS No. 158),
the Companys measurement date is December 31. ARI chose to use the valuation performed as of
October 1, 2007 and apply it over the fifteen months from October 2007 through December 2008 as
permitted under SFAS No. 158. The net periodic benefit cost for both the pension plans and the
postretirement plan was recognized by allocating three months of the cost to retained earnings and
recognizing the remaining twelve months of expense over the course of 2008. During the first
quarter of 2008, the Company recognized a $0.1 million decrease to retained earnings as a result of
implementing the measurement date provisions under SFAS No. 158.
17
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the pension and postretirement plans are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
148 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
|
(543 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized net gain |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost recognized |
|
$ |
223 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
447 |
|
|
$ |
205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
Amortization of loss |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost recognized |
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Pension |
|
$ |
223 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
447 |
|
|
$ |
205 |
|
Postretirement |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic
benefit cost
recognized for both
plans |
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
$ |
169 |
|
|
$ |
458 |
|
|
$ |
338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company also maintains a qualified defined contribution plan, which provides benefits to its
employees based on employee contributions, years of service, and employee earnings with
discretionary contributions allowed. Expenses related to these plans were $0.2 million and $0.3
million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Expenses related to these
plans were $0.4 million and $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Note 14 Commitments and Contingencies
In
connection with the Companys investment in Ohio Castings, ARI
has guaranteed bonds amounting to $10.0 million issued by the State of Ohio to Ohio Castings, of which $2.3
million was outstanding as of June 30, 2009. ARI also has
guaranteed a
$2.0 million state loan that provides for purchases of capital equipment, of which $0.7 million was
outstanding as of June 30, 2009. The two other partners
of Ohio Castings have made identical guarantees of these obligations. It is anticipated that Ohio
Castings will continue to make principal and interest payments while its facility is idle through
partner equity contributions, including additional contributions by the Company.
18
The Companys Axis joint venture entered into a credit agreement in December 2007. In connection
with this event, the Company agreed to a 50.0% guaranty of Axis obligation under its credit
agreement during the construction and start-up phases of the facility. Subject to its terms and
conditions, the guaranty will terminate on the first to occur of (i) the repayment in full of the
guaranteed obligations or (ii) after the facility has been in continuous production at a level
sufficient to meet the facilitys projected financial performance and in any event not less than
365 consecutive days from the certified completion of the facilitys construction (as defined in
the agreement). As of June 30, 2009, Axis had approximately $62.2 million outstanding under the
credit agreement of which the Companys exposure is 50.0%. The Companys guaranty has a maximum
exposure related to it of $35.0 million, exclusive of any capitalized interest, fees, costs and
expenses. The Companys initial partner in the joint venture has made an identical guarantee
relating to this credit agreement.
Effective August 5, 2009, the Company and the other initial partner acquired this loan, with each
party acquiring a 50.0% interest in the loan. The purchase price paid by the Company for its 50.0%
interest was approximately $29.5 million, which equaled the then outstanding principal amount of
the portion of the loan acquired by the Company. See Note 22 for further information regarding this
transaction and the terms of the underlying loan.
The Company is subject to comprehensive Federal, state, local and international environmental laws
and regulations relating to the release or discharge of materials into the environment, the
management, use, processing, handling, storage, transport or disposal of hazardous materials and
wastes, or otherwise relating to the protection of human health and the environment. These laws and
regulations not only expose ARI to liability for the environmental condition of its current or
formerly owned or operated facilities, and its own negligent acts, but also may expose ARI to
liability for the conduct of others or for ARIs actions that were in compliance with all
applicable laws at the time these actions were taken. In addition, these laws may require
significant expenditures to achieve compliance, and are frequently modified or revised to impose
new obligations. Civil and criminal fines and penalties and other sanctions may be imposed for
non-compliance with these environmental laws and regulations. ARIs operations that involve
hazardous materials also raise potential risks of liability under common law. Management believes
that there are no current environmental issues identified that would have a material adverse affect
on the Company. ARI is involved in investigation and remediation activities at properties that it
now owns or leases to address historical contamination and potential contamination by third
parties. The Company is also involved with state agencies in the cleanup of two sites under these
laws. These investigations are in process but it is too early to be able to make a reasonable
estimate, with any certainty, of the timing and extent of remedial actions that may be required,
and the costs that would be involved in such remediation. Substantially all of the issues
identified relate to the use of the properties prior to their transfer to ARI in 1994 by ACF
Industries LLC (ACF) and for which ACF has retained liability for environmental contamination that
may have existed at the time of transfer to ARI. ACF has also agreed to indemnify ARI for any cost
that might be incurred with those existing issues. However, if ACF fails to honor its obligations
to ARI, ARI would be responsible for the cost of such remediation. The Company believes that its
operations and facilities are in substantial compliance with applicable laws and regulations and
that any noncompliance is not likely to have a material adverse effect on its operations or
financial condition.
When it is possible to make a reasonable estimate of the liability with respect to such a matter, a
provision will be made as appropriate. Actual cost to be incurred in future periods may vary from
these estimates. Based on facts presently known, ARI does not believe that the outcome of these
proceedings will have a material adverse effect on its future liquidity, results of operations or
financial position.
ARI is a party to collective bargaining agreements with labor unions at its Longview, Texas repair
facility, its North Kansas City, Missouri repair facility and at its Longview, Texas steel foundry
and components manufacturing facility. These agreements expire in January 2010, September 2010, and
April 2011, respectively. ARI was also party to a collective bargaining agreement at its idled
Milton, Pennsylvania repair facility, which expired on June 19, 2005. The contract provisions under
the agreement provided that the contract would remain in effect under the old terms until
terminated by either party with 60 days notice. However, in the first quarter of 2009, a consent
award of less than $0.1 million was agreed upon and paid resulting in termination of the agreement.
ARI has been named the defendant in a wrongful death lawsuit, Jennifer Nicole Lerma v. American
Railcar Industries, Inc. The lawsuit was filed on August 17, 2007, in the Circuit Court of Greene
County, Arkansas Civil Division. Mediation on January 6, 2009, was not successful and the trial has
been postponed with no scheduled trial date. The Company believes that it is not responsible and
has meritorious defenses against such liability. While it is reasonably possible that this case
could result in a loss, there is not sufficient information to estimate the amount of such loss, if
any, resulting from the lawsuit.
19
Certain claims, suits and complaints arising in the ordinary course of business have been filed or
are pending against ARI. In the opinion of management, all such claims, suits and complaints
arising in the ordinary course of business are without merit or would not have a significant effect
on the future liquidity, results of operations or financial position of ARI if disposed of
unfavorably.
In 2005, ARI entered into supply agreements with a supplier for two types of steel plate. The
agreements are for five years and are cancelable by either party, with proper notice after two
years. The agreement commits ARI to buy a percentage of its production needs from this supplier at
prices that fluctuate with market conditions.
In 2006, ARI entered into an agreement with two parties, including one of the members of the Ohio
Castings joint venture and an affiliate of one of the members of the Ohio Castings joint venture,
to purchase a minimum of 60.0% of certain of our railcar component requirements for the years 2007,
2008 and 2009.
In July 2007, ARI entered into an agreement with its joint venture, Axis, to purchase all of its
requirements of new railcar axles from the joint venture.
During 2008, the Company entered into contracts to purchase a fixed volume of natural gas for a
period of twelve months from October 2008 through September 2009. A portion of the volume was
agreed to at a fixed price. The objective of entering into this contract was to fix the price of a
portion of the Companys purchases of this commodity it uses in the manufacturing process. The
Companys remaining commitment under these contracts is $0.3 million and will be fully satisfied by
the third quarter of 2009.
Note 15 Comprehensive Income
The components of comprehensive income, net of related tax, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
1,132 |
|
|
$ |
6,232 |
|
|
$ |
3,858 |
|
|
$ |
16,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on
available-for-sale securities and
derivatives |
|
|
13,829 |
|
|
|
(10,040 |
) |
|
|
6,066 |
|
|
|
2,679 |
|
Income tax effect of unrealized (gain)
loss on available-for-sale securities
and derivatives |
|
|
(4,840 |
) |
|
|
3,853 |
|
|
|
(2,123 |
) |
|
|
(1,045 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
10,667 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
8,227 |
|
|
$ |
17,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 16 Earnings per Share
The shares used in the computation of the Companys basic and diluted earnings per common share are
reconciled as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding |
|
|
21,302,296 |
|
|
|
21,302,296 |
|
Dilutive effect of employee stock options |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
(1)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding |
|
|
21,302,296 |
|
|
|
21,302,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Stock options to purchase 390,353 shares of common stock were not included in the
calculation for diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008. These options would have resulted in an antidilutive effect to the earnings per
share calculation. |
|
(2) |
|
Stock options to purchase 75,000 shares of common stock were not included in the
calculation for diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008. These options would have resulted in an antidilutive effect to the earnings per share
calculation. During the second and third quarters of 2008, these stock options were
forfeited/canceled without exercise. |
20
Note 17 Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation granted under the 2005 equity incentive plan, as
amended (the 2005 Plan) under the recognition and measurement principles of SFAS No. 123(R),
Stock-based Compensation (SFAS No. 123R), and its related provisions. Stock-based compensation is
expensed using a graded vesting method over the vesting period of the instrument.
The following table presents the amounts for stock-based compensation expense incurred by ARI and
the corresponding line items on the statement of operations that they are classified within:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Stock-based compensation expense (income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue: manufacturing operations |
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
Cost of revenue: railcar services |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Selling, administrative and other |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense (income) |
|
$ |
236 |
|
|
$ |
(309 |
) |
|
$ |
201 |
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
No options were exercised in 2008 or 2009. All stock options fully vested in January 2009. As such,
the Company did not recognize any compensation expense related to stock options during the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009.
As a result of the resignation of the Companys former Chief Financial Officer, William Benac,
75,000 options to purchase common stock were canceled or forfeited. As a result of the cancellation
of these options, the Company recognized income of $0.4 million during the second quarter of 2008
as a result of reversing expense recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 123R.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company recognized $0.1 million and $0.2
million (both exclusive of the income mentioned above), respectively, of expense related to stock
option grants made during 2006 under the 2005 Plan. The Company recognized deferred income tax
expense related to stock options of less than $0.1 million during both the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008.
21
The following is a summary of option activity under the 2005 Plan for January 1, 2009 through June
30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Grant-date |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Covered by |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
of Options |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
($000) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the
beginning of the
period, January 1,
2009 |
|
|
390,353 |
|
|
$ |
21.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding and
exercisable at the
end of the period,
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
390,353 |
|
|
$ |
21.00 |
|
|
18 months |
|
$ |
7.28 |
|
|
$ |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Options to purchase 390,353 shares of the Companys common stock have exercise prices
that are above market price, based on the closing market price of $8.26 per share of the
Companys common stock on the last business day of the period ended June 30, 2009. |
As of June 30, 2009, an aggregate of 515,124 shares were available for issuance in connection with
future grants under the Companys 2005 Plan. Shares issued under the 2005 Plan may consist in whole
or in part of authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares.
Stock Appreciation Rights
The compensation committee of the board of directors of the Company granted awards of stock
appreciation rights (SARs) to certain employees pursuant to the 2005 Plan during April 2007, April
2008, September 2008 and March 2009.
All of the SARs granted in 2007, 196,900 of the SARs granted in 2008 and 212,850 of the SARs
granted in 2009 vest in 25.0% increments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of
the grant date. Each holder must remain employed by the Company through each such date in order to
vest in the corresponding number of SARs.
Additionally, 77,500 of the SARs granted in 2008 and 93,250 of the SARs granted in 2009 similarly
vest in 25.0% increments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date,
but only if the closing price of the Companys common stock achieves a specified price target
during the applicable twelve month period for twenty trading days during any sixty day trading day
period. If the Companys common stock does not achieve the specified price target during the
applicable twelve-month period, the related portion of these performance-based SARs will not vest.
Each holder must further remain employed by the Company through each anniversary of the grant date
in order to vest in the corresponding number of SARs.
The SARs have exercise prices that represent the closing price of the Companys common stock on the
date of grant. Upon the exercise of any SAR, the Company shall pay the holder, in cash, an amount
equal to the excess of (A) the aggregate fair market value (as defined in the 2005 Plan) in respect
of which the SARs are being exercised, over (B) the aggregate exercise price of the SARs being
exercised, in accordance with the terms of the Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement (the SAR
Agreement). The SARs are subject in all respects to the terms and conditions of the 2005 Plan and
the SAR Agreement, which contain non-solicitation, non-competition and confidentiality provisions.
22
The following table provides an analysis of SARs granted in 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Grant |
|
|
|
2008 Grants |
|
|
|
2007 Grant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant date |
|
|
3/3/2009 |
|
|
|
4/28/2008 & 9/12/2008 |
|
|
|
4/4/2007 |
|
# SARs outstanding at June
30, 2009 |
|
|
306,100 |
|
|
|
248,428 |
|
|
|
253,400 |
|
Weighted Avg Exercise price |
|
|
$6.71 |
|
|
|
$20.81 |
|
|
|
$29.49 |
|
Contractual term |
|
|
7 years |
|
|
|
7 years |
|
|
|
7 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 SARs Black
Scholes Valuation
Components: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock volatility range |
|
|
46.7% - 52.3% |
|
|
|
48.3% - 55.3% |
|
|
|
52.3% - 58.5% |
|
Expected life range |
|
|
3.7 - 5.2 years |
|
|
|
2.9 - 4.7 years |
|
|
|
2.4 - 3.3 years |
|
Risk free interest rate range |
|
|
1.6% - 2.5% |
|
|
|
1.6% - 2.5% |
|
|
|
1.1% - 1.6% |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.4% |
|
|
|
0.4% |
|
|
|
0.4% |
|
Forfeiture rate |
|
|
2.0% |
|
|
|
9.0% |
|
|
|
2.0% |
|
The exercise prices represent the closing price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant.
The SARs have a term of seven years. As there was not adequate history for the stock prices of the
Company at the time of valuation, the stock volatility rate was determined using historical
volatility rates for several other companies within the railcar industry. The expected life ranges
represent the use of the simplified method prescribed by the SEC in Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)
No. 110, which uses the average of the vesting period and expiration period of each group of SARs
that vest equally over a four-year period. The interest rates used were the government Treasury
bill rate on the date of valuation. Dividend yield was determined using the historical dividend
rate of the Company. The forfeiture rate used was based on a Company estimate of expected
forfeitures over the contractual life of each grant of SARs for each period.
The Company recognized $0.2 million of compensation expense and $0.3 million of compensation income
during the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to SARs granted under
the 2005 Plan. The Company recognized $0.2 million of compensation expense and less than $0.1
million of compensation income during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
related to SARs granted under the 2005 Plan.
The following is a summary of SARs activity under the 2005 Plan for January 1, 2009 through June
30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Appreciation |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Rights |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(SARs) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life |
|
|
of SARs |
|
|
($000) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the
beginning of the
period, January 1,
2009 |
|
|
504,526 |
|
|
$ |
25.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled / Forfeited |
|
|
(2,698 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
306,100 |
|
|
$ |
6.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the
end of the period,
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
807,928 |
|
|
$ |
18.19 |
|
|
70 months |
|
$ |
1.94 |
|
|
$ |
474,455 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the
end of the period,
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
173,715 |
|
|
$ |
27.16 |
|
|
61 months |
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
306,100 unvested and unexercisable SARs have exercise prices that are below the closing
market price of $8.26 for a share of the Companys common stock as of the last business day
of the quarter ended June 30, 2009 while the remaining 501,828 SARs, of which 173,715 are
vested and exercisable, have exercise prices that are above the closing market price. |
23
As of June 30, 2009, unrecognized compensation costs related to the unvested portion of stock
appreciation rights were estimated to be $1.1 million and were expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 42 months.
Note 18 Common Stock and Dividends on Common Stock
In August 2009, the Companys board of directors suspended the quarterly dividend. Prior to that,
during each quarter since the Companys initial public offering in January 2006, the board of directors
declared and paid cash dividends of $0.03 per share of common stock of the Company.
Note 19 Related Party Transactions
Agreements with ACF
The Company has the following agreements with ACF, a company controlled by Mr. Carl C. Icahn, the
Companys principal beneficial stockholder and the chairman of the Companys board of directors:
Manufacturing Services Agreement
Under the manufacturing services agreement entered into in 1994 and amended in 2005, ACF agreed to
manufacture and distribute, at the Companys instruction, various railcar components. In
consideration for these services, the Company agreed to pay ACF based on agreed upon rates. In the
three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, ARI purchased inventory of $2.8 million and $12.9
million, respectively, of components from ACF. In the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, ARI
purchased inventory of $10.8 million and $25.0 million, respectively, of components from ACF. The
agreement automatically renews unless written notice is provided by the Company.
Supply Agreement
Under a supply agreement entered into in 1994, the Company agreed to manufacture and sell to ACF
specified components at cost plus mark-up or on terms not less favorable than the terms on which
the Company sold the same products to third parties. Revenue recorded under this arrangement was
less than $0.1 million for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. Such amounts
are included under manufacturing operations revenue from affiliates on the condensed consolidated
statement of operations. Profit margins on sales to related parties approximate the margins on
sales to other large customers.
Inventory Storage Agreements
In 2006, ARI entered into two inventory storage agreements with ACF to store designated inventory
that ARI had purchased under its manufacturing services agreement with ACF at ACFs facility. Under
this agreement, ACF holds the inventory at its facility in segregated locations until such time
that the inventory is shipped to ARI.
Wheel Set Agreements
In 2006, ARI entered into an agreement that provided for ARI to procure, purchase and own the raw
material components for wheel sets. These wheel set components are those that are being used in the
assembly of wheel sets for ARI under the ARI/ACF manufacturing services agreement. Under the
manufacturing services agreement with ACF, which remains unchanged, ARI will continue to pay ACF
for its services, specifically labor and overhead, in assembling the wheel sets.
Railcar Manufacturing Agreement
In May 2007, the Company entered into a manufacturing agreement with ACF, pursuant to which the
Company agreed to purchase approximately 1,390 tank railcars from ACF, supported by a new customer
order received at the same time. The profit realized by ARI upon sale of the tank railcars to ARI
customers was first paid to ACF to reimburse it for the start-up costs involved in implementing the
manufacturing arrangements evidenced by the agreement and thereafter, the profit was split evenly
between ARI and ACF. Prior to its termination by ACF as described below, the term of the agreement
was for five years. Either party had the right to terminate the agreement before its fifth
anniversary upon six months prior written notice, with certain exceptions.
24
In the three months ended June 30, 2009, ARI incurred no costs under this agreement. In the three
months ended June 30, 2008, ARI incurred costs under this agreement of $5.1 million, respectively,
in connection with railcars that were manufactured and delivered to customers during that period,
which includes payments made to ACF for its share of the profits along with ARI costs. In the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, ARI incurred costs under this agreement of $4.1 million and
$8.9 million, respectively, in connection with railcars that were manufactured and delivered to
customers during that period. Such amounts are included under cost of revenue on the statement of
operations.
The Company recognized $22.5 million of revenue related to railcars shipped under this agreement
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and no revenue was recognized for the three months ended
June 30, 2009. The Company recognized revenue of $19.0 million and $41.4 million related to
railcars shipped under this agreement for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
On September 23, 2008, a termination letter was received from ACF regarding this agreement
effective the later of the completion of approximately 1,390 tank railcars or March 23, 2009. The
commitment under this agreement was satisfied in March 2009 and the agreement was terminated at
that time.
Other Agreements
In April 2005, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with ACF in which both parties
agreed to provide labor, litigation, labor relations support and consultation, and labor contract
interpretation and negotiation services to one another. In addition, the Company has agreed to
provide ACF with engineering and consulting advice. Fees paid to one another are based on agreed
upon rates. No services were rendered and no amounts were paid during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
Agreements with ARL
The Company has or had the following agreements with ARL, a company controlled by Mr. Carl C.
Icahn, the Companys principal beneficial stockholder and the chairman of the Companys board of
directors:
Railcar Servicing Agreement and Fleet Services Agreement
Effective as of January 1, 2008, the Company entered into a fleet services agreement with ARL,
which replaced a 2005 railcar servicing agreement between the parties. The new agreement reflects a
reduced level of fleet management services, relating primarily to logistics management services,
for which ARL now pays a fixed monthly fee. Additionally, under the new agreement, the Company
continues to provide railcar repair and maintenance services to ARL for a charge of labor,
components and materials. The Company currently provides such repair and maintenance services for
approximately 26,000 railcars for ARL. The new agreement extends through December 31, 2010, and is
automatically renewed for additional one-year periods unless either party gives at least sixty
days prior notice of termination. There is no termination fee if the Company elects to terminate
the new agreement. For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, revenues of $4.5 million and
$4.2 million were recorded under this agreement, respectively. For the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, revenues of $8.0 million and $8.2 million were recorded under this agreement,
respectively. Such amounts are included under railcar services revenue from affiliates on the
condensed consolidated statement of operations. Profit margins on sales to related parties
approximate the margins on sales to other large customers.
Services Agreement, Separation Agreement and Rent and Building Services Extension Agreement
Under the Companys services agreement with ARL, ARL agreed to provide the Company certain
information technology services, rent and building services and limited administrative services.
The rent and building services includes the use of certain facilities owned by the Companys former
chief executive officer and current vice chairman of the board of directors, which is further
described later in this footnote. Under this agreement, the Company agreed to provide purchasing
and engineering services to ARL. Consideration exchanged between the companies is based upon an
agreed fixed annual fee.
25
On March 30, 2007, ARI and ARL agreed, pursuant to a separation agreement, to terminate, effective
December 31, 2006, all services provided to ARL by the Company under the services agreement.
Additionally, the separation agreement provided that all services provided to the Company by ARL
under the services agreement would be terminated except for rent and building services. Under the
separation agreement, ARL agreed to waive the six-month notice requirement for termination required
by the services agreement.
In February 2008, ARI and ARL agreed, pursuant to an extension agreement, that effective December
31, 2007, all rent and building services would continue unless otherwise terminated by either party
upon six months prior notice or by mutual agreement between the parties.
Total fees paid to ARL under these agreements were $0.1 million for both the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008. Total fees paid to ARL under these agreements were $0.3 million for both
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. The fees paid to ARL are included in selling,
administrative and other costs related to affiliates on the condensed consolidated statement of
operations.
Trademark License Agreement
Under this agreement, which is effective as of June 30, 2005, ARI granted a nonexclusive,
perpetual, worldwide license to ARL to use ARIs common law trademarks American Railcar and the
diamond shape logo. ARL may only use the licensed trademarks in connection with the railcar
leasing business. ARI is entitled to annual fees of $1,000 in exchange for this license.
Sales Contracts
In March 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with ARL for the Company to manufacture and
ARL to purchase 1,000 railcars in 2007. The Company, prior to this agreement, had manufactured and
sold railcars to ARL on a purchase order basis. The agreement also included an option for ARL to
purchase up to an additional 300 railcars in 2007 and an additional 1,400 railcars in 2008. ARL
exercised the option to purchase approximately 100 additional railcars in 2007 and exercised the
option to purchase 1,400 additional railcars in 2008. Revenue for these railcars sold to ARL is
included under manufacturing operations revenue from affiliates on the accompanying condensed
consolidated statement of operations. Profit margins on sales to related parties approximate the
margins on sales to other large customers.
In September 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with ARL for the Company to manufacture
and ARL to purchase 500 railcars in both 2008 and 2009.
Agreements with other affiliated parties
In September 2003, Castings loaned Ohio Castings $3.0 million under a promissory note, which was
due in January 2004. The note was renegotiated resulting in a new principal amount of $2.2 million
and bears interest at 4.0%. Payments of principal and interest are due quarterly with the last
payment due in August 2009. This note receivable is included in investment in joint venture on the
accompanying balance sheet. Total amounts due from Ohio Castings under this note were $0.5 million
at both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The other partners in the joint venture have made
identical loans to Ohio Castings. Due to the idling of Ohio Castings production facility in June
2009, the joint venture advised the partners that it is not be able to repay the notes. The joint
venture and all three partners are evaluating the best course of action regarding the notes.
In
connection with the Companys investment in Ohio Castings, ARI
has guaranteed bonds amounting to $10.0 million issued by the State of Ohio to Ohio Castings, of which $2.3
million was outstanding as
of June 30, 2009. ARI also has guaranteed a $2.0 million state loan that
provides for purchases of capital equipment, of which $0.7 million was outstanding as of June 30,
2009. The two other partners of Ohio Castings have made identical guarantees of these obligations.
It is anticipated that Ohio Castings will continue to make principal and interest payments while
its facility is idled through partner equity contributions, including additional contributions by
the Company.
26
One of the Companys joint ventures, Axis, entered into a credit agreement in December 2007. In
connection with this event, the Company agreed to a 50.0% guaranty of Axis obligation under its
credit agreement during the construction and start-up phases of the facility. Subject to its terms
and conditions, the guaranty will terminate on the first to occur of (i) the repayment in full of
the guaranteed obligations or (ii) after the facility has been in continuous production at a level
sufficient to meet the facilitys projected financial performance and in any event not less than
365 consecutive days from the certified completion of the facilitys construction. As of June 30,
2009, Axis had approximately $62.2 million outstanding under the credit agreement of which the
Companys exposure is 50.0%. The Companys guaranty has a maximum exposure related to it of $35.0
million, exclusive of any capitalized interest, fees, costs and expenses. The Companys initial
partner in the joint venture has made an identical guarantee relating to this credit agreement.
Effective August 5, 2009, the Company and the other initial partner acquired this loan, with each
party acquiring a 50.0% interest in the loan. The purchase price paid by the Company for its 50.0%
interest was approximately $29.5 million, which equaled the then outstanding principal amount of
the portion of the loan acquired by the Company. See Note 22 for further information regarding this
transaction and the terms of the underlying loan.
The Company leases certain facilities from an entity owned by its former chief executive officer
and current vice chairman of the board of directors. Expenses paid to related parties for these
facilities were $0.3 million for both the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. Expenses paid
to related parties for these facilities were $0.5 million for both the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008.
In July 2007, ARI entered into an agreement with its joint venture, Axis, to purchase all of its
requirements of new railcar axles from the joint venture.
Effective January 1, 2009, ARI entered into a services agreement with a term of one year to provide
Axis accounting, tax, human resources and information technology assistance for an annual fee of
$0.2 million.
Effective April 1, 2009, Mr. James J. Unger, the Companys former chief executive officer, assumed
the role of vice chairman of the board of directors and became a consultant to the Company. In
exchange for these services, Mr. Unger will receive an annual consulting fee of $135,000 and an
annual director fee of $65,000 that are both payable quarterly, in advance, and the Company will
continue to provide Mr. Unger with an automobile allowance. In his role as consultant, Mr. Unger
will report to and serve at the discretion of the Companys Board.
Financial information for transactions with affiliates
As of June 30, 2009, amounts due from affiliates were $15.1 million in accounts receivable from ACF
and ARL. As of December 31, 2008, amounts due from affiliates represented $10.3 million in
receivables from ACF, ARL, and Axis.
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, amounts due to affiliates included $0.6 million and $5.2
million, respectively, in accounts payable to ACF and ARL.
Cost of revenue for manufacturing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
included $11.5 million and $22.8 million, respectively, in railcar products produced by Ohio
Castings. Cost of revenue for manufacturing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 included $25.0 million and $37.4 million, respectively, in railcar products produced by Ohio
Castings.
Inventory at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 includes $3.5 million and $4.9 million,
respectively, of purchases from Ohio Castings. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, all profit
from a related party for inventory still on hand was eliminated.
Note 20 Operating Segment and Sales/Credit Concentrations
ARI operates in two reportable segments: manufacturing operations and railcar services. Performance
is evaluated based on revenue and operating profit. Intersegment sales and transfers are accounted
for as if sales or transfers were to third parties. The information in the following tables is
derived from the segments internal financial reports used for corporate management purposes:
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
Railcar |
|
|
Corporate & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
Operations |
|
|
Services |
|
|
all other |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revenues from external
customers |
|
$ |
94,608 |
|
|
$ |
15,318 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
109,926 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(622 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue external
customers |
|
|
(85,106 |
) |
|
|
(12,011 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97,117 |
) |
Cost of intersegment revenue |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss) |
|
|
9,600 |
|
|
|
3,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
12,809 |
|
Selling, administrative and
other |
|
|
(1,349 |
) |
|
|
(526 |
) |
|
|
(3,786 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
$ |
8,251 |
|
|
$ |
2,783 |
|
|
$ |
(3,786 |
) |
|
$ |
(100 |
) |
|
$ |
7,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
Railcar |
|
|
Corporate & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
Operations |
|
|
Services |
|
|
all other |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revenues from external
customers |
|
$ |
190,863 |
|
|
$ |
13,619 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
204,482 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue external
customers |
|
|
(173,152 |
) |
|
|
(10,718 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(183,870 |
) |
Cost of intersegment revenue |
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss) |
|
|
17,757 |
|
|
|
2,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
20,612 |
|
Selling, administrative and
other |
|
|
(1,992 |
) |
|
|
(551 |
) |
|
|
(3,610 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
$ |
15,765 |
|
|
$ |
2,359 |
|
|
$ |
(3,610 |
) |
|
$ |
(55 |
) |
|
$ |
14,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
Railcar |
|
|
Corporate & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
Operations |
|
|
Services |
|
|
all other |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revenues from external
customers |
|
$ |
239,278 |
|
|
$ |
27,595 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
266,873 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,058 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue external
customers |
|
|
(215,204 |
) |
|
|
(22,483 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(237,687 |
) |
Cost of intersegment revenue |
|
|
(871 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss) |
|
|
24,216 |
|
|
|
5,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
29,186 |
|
Selling, administrative and
other |
|
|
(4,095 |
) |
|
|
(1,042 |
) |
|
|
(7,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,674 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
$ |
20,121 |
|
|
$ |
4,073 |
|
|
$ |
(7,537 |
) |
|
$ |
(145 |
) |
|
$ |
16,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
Railcar |
|
|
Corporate & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
Operations |
|
|
Services |
|
|
all other |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revenues from external
customers |
|
$ |
361,647 |
|
|
$ |
26,884 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
388,531 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue external
customers |
|
|
(324,042 |
) |
|
|
(21,585 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(345,627 |
) |
Cost of intersegment revenue |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss) |
|
|
37,682 |
|
|
|
5,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
42,904 |
|
Selling, administrative and
other |
|
|
(3,955 |
) |
|
|
(1,045 |
) |
|
|
(7,994 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,994 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
$ |
33,727 |
|
|
$ |
4,270 |
|
|
$ |
(7,994 |
) |
|
$ |
(93 |
) |
|
$ |
29,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
Railcar |
|
|
Corporate & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
Operations |
|
|
Services |
|
|
all other |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
295,415 |
|
|
$ |
46,823 |
|
|
$ |
320,613 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
662,851 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
349,201 |
|
|
$ |
40,246 |
|
|
$ |
290,207 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
679,654 |
|
28
Manufacturing operations
Manufacturing revenues from affiliates were 34.0% and 26.3% of total consolidated revenues for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Manufacturing revenues from affiliates
were 32.1% and 22.8% of total consolidated revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
Manufacturing revenues from the most significant unaffiliated customer totaled 34.2% and 40.1% of
total consolidated revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Manufacturing revenues from the most significant affiliated customer totaled 32.2% for the six
months ended June 30, 2009. Manufacturing revenues from the most significant unaffiliated customer
totaled 40.6% of total consolidated revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Manufacturing revenues from the two most significant customers (including an affiliated customer)
were 68.3% and 66.3% of total consolidated revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. Manufacturing revenues from the two most significant customers (including an
affiliated customer) were 62.7% and 63.3% of total consolidated revenues for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Manufacturing receivables from the most significant affiliated customer were 35.2% of total
consolidated accounts receivable at June 30, 2009. Manufacturing receivables from the most
significant affiliated customer were 22.9% of total consolidated accounts receivable at December
31, 2008, respectively. Manufacturing receivables from the two most significant customers
(including an affiliated customer) were 51.7% of total consolidated accounts receivable at June 30,
2009. Manufacturing receivables from the two most significant customers (including an affiliated
customer) were 40.0% of total consolidated accounts receivable including due from affiliates at
December 31, 2008.
Railcar services
Railcar services revenues from affiliates were 4.0% and 2.0% of total consolidated revenues for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Railcar services revenues from affiliates
were 3.0% and 2.1% of total consolidated revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
No single railcar services customer accounted for more than 10.0% of total consolidated revenue for
both the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. No single railcar services customer
accounted for more than 10.0% of total consolidated accounts receivable as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008.
Note 21 Supplemental Cash Flow Information
ARI received interest income of $2.1 million and $4.3 million for the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively.
ARI paid interest expense of $10.5 million for both the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
ARI paid income taxes of $0.5 million and $13.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
In May 2009, the board of directors of the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.03 per share of
common stock of the Company to shareholders of record as of June 26, 2009 that was paid on July 10,
2009.
In May 2008, the board of directors of the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.03 per share of
common stock of the Company to shareholders of record as of June 27, 2008 that was paid on July 11,
2008.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded an unrealized gain on its
short-term investments of $6.1 million and an unrealized gain on its short-term investments of $1.6
million as of June 30, 2008, which were recorded to accumulated other comprehensive loss within
stockholders equity, net of taxes.
29
Note 22 Subsequent Events
All of the subsequent events listed below have been evaluated through the date these financial
statements were issued, August 7, 2009.
Quarterly dividend
In August 2009, the Companys board of directors suspended the quarterly dividend.
Purchase of Axis loan
As of June 30, 2009, Axis had approximately $62.2 million outstanding under a credit agreement
among Axis, Bank of America, as administrative agent (Axis Agent), and the lenders party thereto
(as amended, the Axis Credit Agreement). Under the Axis Credit Agreement, the original lenders made
financing available to Axis in an aggregate amount of up to $70.0 million, consisting of up to
$60.0 million in term loans and up to $10.0 million in revolving loans. Generally, Axis
obligations under the Axis Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of Axis real and
personal property, as well as by a pledge of the equity in Axis owned by Axis HoldCo. The
obligations under the Axis Credit Agreement were guaranteed 50.0% by the Company and 50.0% by the
other initial partner in the venture.
In July 2009, the Axis Agent alleged that Axis was in default under the Axis Credit Agreement and
in connection therewith proposed certain amendments to the Axis Credit Agreement. Axis disputed the
alleged default. Following discussions with the Axis Agent and Axis, effective August 5, 2009, ARI
Component and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the other initial partner acquired the Axis Credit
Agreement, with each party acquiring a 50.0% interest in the loan. The purchase price paid by the
Company for its 50.0% interest was approximately $29.5 million, which equaled the then outstanding
principal amount of the portion of the loan acquired by the Company. In connection with the
purchase of the Axis Loan, the associated guaranties of the Company and the other initial partner
were canceled.
Subject to certain limitations, at the election of Axis, the interest rate for the loans under the
Axis Credit Agreement is based on LIBOR or the prime rate. For LIBOR-based loans, the interest rate
is equal to the greater of 7.75% or adjusted LIBOR plus 4.75%. For prime-based loans, the interest
rate is equal to the greater of 7.75% or the prime rate plus 2.5%. In either case, the interest
rate is subject to increase upon the occurrence of certain defaults. Interest on LIBOR-based loans
is due and payable, at the election of Axis, every one, two, three or six months, and interest on
prime-based loans is due and payable quarterly. Additionally, at Axis election, until December 31,
2010, interest may be payable by increasing the outstanding principal amount of the term loans by
the amount of interest otherwise due and payable in cash.
The commitment to make term loans under the Axis Credit Agreement expires on December 31, 2010.
Beginning on March 31, 2011, the term loans will become due and payable on the last day of each
fiscal quarter in twenty-two equal installments, with the last payment to become due on June 26,
2016. The commitment to make revolving loans under the Axis Credit Agreement will expire and the
revolving loans will become due and payable on December 28, 2012. Upon certain events described
more fully in the Axis Credit Agreement, principal and interest may become due and payable sooner
than described above.
Subject to borrowing base availability, Axis may borrow revolving loans up to the $10.0 million
limit described above, of which ARI Component will be responsible to fund 50.0%, up to $5.0
million. Additionally, subject to the terms of the Axis Credit Agreement, Axis can request loans up
to the remaining unfunded amount of approximately $0.9 million, of which ARI Component will be
responsible to fund 50.0%.
Sale of corporate bonds
In the third quarter of 2009, the Company sold $10.0 million, par value, of corporate bonds that
were classified as available-for-sale. A realized gain of approximately $1.0 million was recorded
to other income.
30
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Some of the statements contained in this report are forward-looking statements within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Exchange Act), including statements regarding our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions.
Such statements include, without limitation, statements regarding various estimates we have made in
preparing our financial statements, statements regarding expected future trends relating to our
industry, our results of operations and the sufficiency of our capital resources and statements
regarding anticipated production schedules for our products and the anticipated construction and
production schedules of our joint ventures. These forward-looking statements are subject to known
and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
anticipated.
Risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect our business and prospects include without
limitation:
|
|
|
the impact of the current economic downturn, adverse market conditions and restricted
credit markets, and the impact of the continuation of these conditions; |
|
|
|
our reliance upon a small number of customers that represent a large percentage of our
revenues and backlog; |
|
|
|
the conversion of our railcar backlog into revenues, including without limitation the
material adverse effects that could result if CIT seeks bankruptcy relief or continues to
experience financial difficulties; |
|
|
|
the health of and prospects for the overall railcar industry; |
|
|
|
our prospects in light of the cyclical nature of its railcar manufacturing business and
the current economic environment; |
|
|
|
our ability to manage overhead and production slow downs; |
|
|
|
the highly competitive nature of the railcar manufacturing industry, fluctuating costs
of raw materials, including steel and railcar components and delays in the delivery of such
raw materials and components; |
|
|
|
fluctuations in the supply of components and raw materials we use in railcar
manufacturing; |
|
|
|
risks associated with potential acquisitions or joint ventures; |
|
|
|
the risk of lack of acceptance of our new railcar offerings by our customers; |
|
|
|
the sufficiency of our liquidity and capital resources; |
|
|
|
anticipated production schedules for our products and the anticipated construction and
production schedules of our joint ventures; |
|
|
|
the impact and anticipated benefits of any acquisitions we may complete; |
|
|
|
the impact and costs and expenses of any litigation we may be subject to now or in the
future; |
|
|
|
compliance with covenants contained in our unsecured senior notes and in our revolving
credit facility; and |
|
|
|
the ongoing benefits and risks related to our relationship with Mr. Carl C. Icahn, our
principal beneficial stockholder and the chairman of our board of directors, and certain of
his affiliates. |
In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as may, will,
should, could, would, expects, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates, projects,
predicts, potential and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements.
Our actual results could be different from the results described in or anticipated by our
forward-looking statements due to the inherent uncertainty of estimates, forecasts and projections
and may be better or worse than anticipated. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements represent our estimates
and assumptions only as of the date of this report. We expressly disclaim any duty to provide
updates to forward-looking statements, and the estimates and assumptions associated with them,
after the date of this report, in order to reflect changes in circumstances or expectations or the
occurrence of unanticipated events except to the extent required by applicable securities laws. All
of the forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to the factors
discussed above and under Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 6, 2009
(the Annual Report) and in Part II Item 1A of this report, as well as the risks and uncertainties
discussed elsewhere in the Annual Report and in this report. We qualify all of our forward-looking
statements by these cautionary statements. We caution you that these risks are not exhaustive. We
operate in a continually changing business environment and new risks emerge from time to time.
31
OVERVIEW
We are a leading North American designer and manufacturer of hopper and tank railcars. We also
repair and refurbish railcars, provide fleet management services and design and manufacture certain
railcar and industrial components. We provide our railcar customers with integrated solutions
through a comprehensive set of high quality products and related services.
We operate in two reportable segments: manufacturing operations and railcar services. Manufacturing
operations consist of railcar manufacturing and railcar and industrial component manufacturing.
Railcar services consist of railcar repair, refurbishment and fleet management services. Financial
information about our business segments for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 is
set forth in Note 20 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
The ongoing economic downturn is continuing to have an adverse effect on the railcar and other
industrial manufacturing markets in which we compete, resulting in substantially reduced orders in
the marketplace, increased competition for those fewer orders, increased pricing pressures and
lower revenues. Moreover, as a result of the economic downturn, we believe that a significant
amount of the railcar fleet in North America is idle. The availability of these railcars to be
brought back into service would, we believe, delay a recovery in railcar orders following an
economic revival.
As a result of the current market conditions, our backlog has been declining significantly. In
response, we have reduced production rates and workforce at our manufacturing facilities and
continue to evaluate our capacity and production schedules. We continue to monitor expenses in an
effort to reduce overhead costs at all of our locations. If we are unable to obtain significant new
orders, we will be required to further curtail our manufacturing operations.
CIT Group Inc. (CIT), our largest customer, recently announced that it amended certain of its debt
arrangements to provide for up to $3.0 billion in financing. CIT also recently announced that if it
is unsuccessful in its efforts to complete an ongoing tender offer for certain of its notes due in
August 2009 or to effectuate a comprehensive restructuring of its liabilities, CIT may be forced to
seek bankruptcy relief. CIT accounted for approximately 13.0% and approximately 31.0% of our
revenues in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and accounts for
approximately 53.0% of our backlog as of June 30, 2009. In the event of bankruptcy for whatever
reason, CIT, among other things, may have the right to cancel or could renegotiate its orders
included in our backlog. Even if CIT does not seek bankruptcy relief, any continued financial
difficulties of CIT could materially adversely affect our business relationships with CIT and could
materially adversely affect our business, prospects and financial condition.
32
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months ended June 30, 2009 compared to Three Months ended June 30, 2008
The following table summarizes our historical operations as a percentage of revenues for the
periods shown. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of operating results that may
be expected in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended, |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing Operations |
|
|
86.1 |
% |
|
|
93.3 |
% |
Railcar services |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of manufacturing |
|
|
(77.4 |
%) |
|
|
(84.7 |
%) |
Cost of railcar services |
|
|
(10.9 |
%) |
|
|
(5.2 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
|
(88.3 |
%) |
|
|
(89.9 |
%) |
Gross profit |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
Selling, administrative and other |
|
|
(5.1 |
%) |
|
|
(3.0 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
Interest income |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(4.7 |
%) |
|
|
(2.5 |
%) |
Other income (loss) |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(0.7 |
%) |
(Loss) earnings from joint venture |
|
|
(1.8 |
%) |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income tax expense |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(0.7 |
%) |
|
|
(1.8 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
Our revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased 46.2% to $109.9 million from $204.5
million in the three months ended June 30, 2008. This decrease was due to decreased revenues from
our manufacturing operations, partially offset by increased revenues from our railcar services
segment.
Our manufacturing operations revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased 50.4% to
$94.6 million from $190.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The primary reasons for
the decrease in revenue were a decrease in railcar shipments, partially offset by increased overall
average selling prices on railcars due to a change in product mix and a decrease in surcharges that
we pass on to our customers. We have decreased our workforce and production rates at our
manufacturing plants due to reduced demand resulting in lower shipments. During the three months
ended June 30, 2009, we shipped approximately 980 railcars compared to approximately 2,080 railcars
in the same period of 2008. None of these railcar shipments related to our railcar manufacturing
agreement with ACF Industries, LLC (ACF) in 2009 as compared to approximately 240 railcar shipments
in 2008. This agreement terminated effective in March 2009, as described in Note 19 to our
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, our manufacturing operations included $37.4 million, or
34.0% of our total consolidated revenues, from transactions with affiliates, compared to $53.8
million, or 26.3% of our total consolidated revenues in the three months ended June 30, 2008. These
revenues were attributable to sales of railcars and railcar parts to companies controlled by Mr.
Carl Icahn.
Our railcar services revenues in the three months ended June 30, 2009 increased to $15.3 million
compared to $13.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The increase was primarily
attributable to the completion of expansion projects at our repair facilities that resulted in
higher volumes. For the second quarter of 2009, our railcar services revenues included $4.5
million, or 4.0% of our total consolidated revenues, from transactions with affiliates, compared to
$4.2 million, or 2.0% of our total consolidated revenues, in the second quarter of 2008.
33
Gross Profit
Our gross profit decreased to $12.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2009 from $20.6
million in the three months ended June 30, 2008. However, our gross profit margin increased to
11.7% in the second quarter of 2009 from 10.1% in the second quarter of 2008, driven primarily by
an increase in our gross profit margins from our manufacturing operations.
Gross profit from our manufacturing operations decreased $8.2 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008 due primarily to reduced railcar
shipments. Gross profit margin, for our manufacturing operations, however, was 10.0% in the three
months ended June 30, 2009, an increase from 9.3% in the three months ended June 30, 2008. This
increase is primarily attributable to fixed overhead cost control measures and strong labor
efficiencies at most of our manufacturing locations, partially offset by lower absorption of our
manufacturing locations fixed costs due to lower volumes. Additionally, the 2008 gross profit
margin was negatively impacted by low margins on fixed price hopper railcar orders.
Gross profit for our railcar services operations increased $0.4 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to an increase in
revenue. Gross profit margin for our railcar services operations increased to 21.6% in the three
months ended June 30, 2009 from 21.3% in the three months ended June 30, 2008. The increase is
primarily attributable to efficiencies created by increased volume due to completed expansion
projects.
Selling, Administrative and Other Expenses
Our total selling, administrative and other expenses decreased to $5.7 million for the second
quarter of 2009, compared to $6.2 million for the second quarter of 2008. The decrease of $0.5
million was attributable to a decrease of $1.0 million of other selling administrative and other
expenses including a one-time reduction to professional fees and incentive payments as well as
other cost control measures partially offset by a stock-based compensation expense increase of $0.5
million, as described below.
In the second quarter of 2009, we recognized expense related to stock-based compensation of $0.2
million, attributable to stock appreciation rights (SARs), which settle in cash, granted in 2009,
2008 and 2007. This is compared to stock-based compensation income of $0.3 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2008, which was attributable to stock options we granted in 2006 and to SARs,
which settle in cash, granted in 2007 and 2008. The increase in expense is primarily attributable
to $0.4 million of income being recognized in the second quarter of 2008 as a result of the
cancellation of William Benacs stock options.
Interest Expense and Income
Net interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $3.3 million, representing $5.1
million of interest expense and $1.8 million of interest income, comparable to $3.3 million of net
interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2008, representing $5.0 million of interest
expense and $1.7 million of interest income.
Other Income (Loss)
Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 increased $1.5 million when compared to the
three months ended June 30, 2008. Other income of less than $0.1 million recognized in the second
quarter of 2009 related to a realized gain on a foreign currency option. The other loss of $1.5
million recognized in the second quarter of 2008 related to unrealized losses on total return swaps
and realized gains on the sale of Greenbrier shares and the sale of the total return swaps indexed
to these shares.
(Loss) Earnings from Joint Venture
Our joint venture activity decreased to a loss of $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30,
2009 from earnings of $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. This was partially
attributable to our share of Ohio Castings earnings decreasing $1.3 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease was also
attributable to our share of Axis losses increasing
approximately $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2008.
34
In June 2009, Ohio Castings idled its manufacturing facility due to the weak railcar market and
advised us that it currently expects to restart production when demand returns. Ohio Castings
performed an analysis of long-lived assets in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No. 144). Based on this analysis, Ohio Castings
concluded that there was no impairment of their long-lived assets. As a result, we determined there
was no impairment of the investment in Ohio Castings. We and Ohio Castings will continue
to monitor for impairment as necessary.
Income Taxes
Our income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $0.7 million or 39.0% of our
earnings before income taxes, as compared to $3.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008,
or 36.1% of our earnings before income taxes. The quarterly rate increased due to the 2009 rate
does not reflect any benefits from the Domestic Production Activities deduction due to decreased
production rates at our manufacturing locations leading to decreased income compared to 2008.
Six Months ended June 30, 2009 compared to Six Months ended June 30, 2008
The following table summarizes our historical operations as a percentage of revenues for the
periods shown. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of operating results that may
be expected in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended, |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing Operations |
|
|
89.7 |
% |
|
|
93.1 |
% |
Railcar services |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of manufacturing |
|
|
(80.7 |
%) |
|
|
(83.4 |
%) |
Cost of railcar services |
|
|
(8.4 |
%) |
|
|
(5.6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
|
(89.1 |
%) |
|
|
(89.0 |
%) |
Gross profit |
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
Selling, administrative and other |
|
|
(4.7 |
%) |
|
|
(3.3 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
Interest income |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(3.9 |
%) |
|
|
(2.6 |
%) |
Other (loss) income |
|
|
(0.0 |
%) |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
(Loss) earnings from joint venture |
|
|
(1.1 |
%) |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income tax expense |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(0.9 |
%) |
|
|
(2.5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
Our revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased 31.3% to $266.9 million from $388.5
million in the six months ended June 30, 2008. This decrease was due to decreased revenues from our
manufacturing operations, partially offset by increased revenues from our railcar services segment.
Our manufacturing operations revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased 33.8% to
$239.3 million
from $361.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The primary reasons for the decrease in
revenue were a decrease in railcar shipments, partially offset by increased overall average selling
prices on all railcars due to a change in product mix and a decrease in surcharges that we pass on
to our customers. We have decreased our workforce and production rates at our manufacturing plants
due to reduced demand resulting in lower shipments. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we
shipped approximately 2,470 railcars compared to approximately 3,980 railcars in the same period of
2008. Of these railcar shipments, 220 were related to our railcar manufacturing agreement with ACF
in 2009 as compared to approximately 460 railcar shipments in 2008. This agreement terminated
effective in March 2009, as described in Note 19 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
35
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, our manufacturing operations included $85.8 million, or
32.1% of our total consolidated revenues, from transactions with affiliates, compared to $88.4
million, or 22.8% of our total consolidated revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2008. These
revenues were attributable to sales of railcars and railcar parts to companies controlled by Mr.
Carl Icahn.
Our railcar services revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2009 increased to $27.6 million
compared to $26.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The increase was primarily
attributable to the completion of expansion projects at three repair facilities that drove
increased volumes. For the first half of 2009, our railcar services revenues included $8.0 million,
or 3.0% of our total consolidated revenues, from transactions with affiliates, compared to $8.2
million, or 2.1% of our total consolidated revenues, in the first half of 2008.
Gross Profit
Our gross profit decreased to $29.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009 from $42.9
million in the six months ended June 30, 2008. Our gross profit margin decreased to 10.9% in the
first half of 2009 from 11.0% in the first half of 2008, driven primarily by a decrease in our
gross profit margins from our manufacturing operations.
Gross profit from our manufacturing operations decreased $13.5 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008. Gross profit margin for our
manufacturing operations was 10.1% in the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease from 10.4% in
the six months ended June 30, 2008. This decrease is primarily attributable to decreased railcar
shipments, competitive pricing and fixed overhead costs that exist regardless of production output,
partially offset by strong labor efficiencies at most of our manufacturing locations, partially
offset by lower absorption of our manufacturing locations fixed costs due to lower volumes.
Gross profit for our railcar services operations decreased $0.2 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008. Gross profit margin for our railcar
services operations decreased to 18.5% in the six months ended June 30, 2009 from 19.7% in the six
months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease is primarily attributable to inefficiencies experienced
early in 2009 due to lower work content prior to the completion of the expansion projects at three
facilities.
Selling, Administrative and Other Expenses
Our total selling, administrative and other expenses decreased to $12.7 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009, compared to $13.0 million for the same period of 2008. Selling, administrative
and other expenses decreased primarily due to decreased workforce and other cost cutting measures
partially offset by a legal settlement and an increase in stock-based compensation, as described
below.
In the first half of 2009, we recognized stock-based compensation expense of $0.2 million,
attributable to SARs, which settle in cash, granted in 2009, 2008 and 2007. This is compared to
stock-based compensation income of less than $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008,
which was attributable to stock options we granted in 2006 and SARs, which settle in cash, granted
in 2007 and 2008. 2008 was impacted by $0.4 million of income being recognized in the second
quarter 2008 as a result of the cancellation of William Benacs stock options.
Interest Expense and Income
Net interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $7.3 million, representing $10.3
million of interest expense and $3.0 million of interest income, as compared to $5.8 million of net
interest expense for the six months
ended June 30, 2008, representing $10.1 million of interest expense and $4.3 million of interest
income.
Our interest expense in the first half of 2009 was comparable to the first half of 2008. Our
interest income decreased $1.3 million in the first half of 2009 compared to the first half of
2008. The decrease in interest income was primarily attributable to lower cash balances and
interest rates in the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 30,
2008.
36
Other (Loss) Income
Other loss for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $0.1 million as compared to other income of
$1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Other loss of $0.1 million recognized in the
six months ended June 30, 2009 related to the realized loss on foreign currency option. The other
income of $1.7 million recognized in the six months ended June 30, 2008 related to unrealized gains
on total return swaps and realized gains on the sale of Greenbrier stock and the sale of the total
return swaps indexed to these shares.
(Loss) Earnings from Joint Venture
Our joint venture activity decreased to a loss of $2.8 million for the six months ended June 30,
2009 from earnings of $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. This was partially
attributable to our share of Ohio Castings profits and losses decreasing approximately $2.0
million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008.
The decrease was also attributable to our share of Axis losses increasing $1.2 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008.
In June 2009, Ohio Castings idled its manufacturing facility due to the weak railcar market and
advised us that it currently expects to restart production when demand returns. Ohio Castings
performed an analysis of long-lived assets in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No. 144). Based on this analysis, Ohio Castings
concluded that there was no impairment of their long-lived assets. As a result, we determined there
was no impairment of the investment in Ohio Castings. We and Ohio Castings will continue
to monitor for impairment as necessary.
Income Taxes
Our income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $2.5 million or 39.0% of our
earnings before income taxes, as compared to $9.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008,
or 37.6% of our earnings before income taxes. The quarterly rate increased because the 2009 rate
does not reflect any benefits from the Domestic Production Activities deduction due to decreased
production rates at our manufacturing locations leading to decreased income compared to 2008.
BACKLOG
We define backlog as the number and sales value of railcars that our customers have committed in
writing to purchase from us that have not been recognized as revenues. As of June 30, 2009, our
total backlog was approximately 1,770 railcars valued at approximately $155.9 million. As of
December 31, 2008, our total backlog was approximately 4,240 railcars valued at approximately
$373.1 million. We estimate that approximately 71.0% of our June 30, 2009, backlog will be
converted to revenues by the end of 2009. As of June 30, 2009, approximately 53.0% of the railcars
in our backlog are to be sold to CIT and approximately 31.0% of the railcars in our backlog are to
be sold to our affiliate, ARL. Customer orders may be subject to requests for delays in deliveries,
inspection rights and other customary industry terms and conditions, which could prevent or delay
backlog from being converted into revenues. The railcars in our backlog attributable to orders by
CIT are subject to the additional risks described above under Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsOverview
and in Part IIItem 1A of this report.
The reported backlog includes railcars relating to purchase obligations based upon an assumed
product mix consistent with past orders. Changes in product mix from what is assumed would affect
the dollar amount of our backlog. Estimated backlog value reflects the total revenues expected to
be attributable to the backlog reported at the end of the particular period as if such backlog were
converted to actual revenues. Estimated backlog reflects known
price adjustments for material cost changes but does not reflect a projection of any future
material price adjustments that are provided for in certain customer contracts.
37
Historically, we have experienced little variation between the number of railcars ordered and the
number of railcars actually delivered, however, our backlog is not necessarily indicative of our
future results of operations. Our backlog includes commitments under multi-year purchase and sale
agreements. Under these agreements, the customers have agreed to buy a minimum number of railcars
from us in each of the contract years, and typically may choose to satisfy their purchase
obligations from among a variety of railcars described in the agreements. As delivery dates could
be extended on certain orders, we cannot guarantee that our reported railcar backlog will convert
to revenue in any particular period, if at all, nor can we guarantee that the actual revenue from
these orders will equal our reported backlog estimates or that our future revenue efforts will be
successful.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our primary source of liquidity for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was cash generated from
operations and cash we have on hand from the senior unsecured notes we sold in February 2007,
offset by cash used for capital expenditures and cash used to purchase our short-term investments.
As of June 30, 2009, we had working capital of $388.8 million, including $282.6 million of cash and
cash equivalents. We also have a $100.0 million revolving credit facility. This facility is
described in further detail in Note 11 of our condensed consolidated financial statements, and
provides for relief from certain financial covenants described in that Note so long as we maintain
excess availability of at least $30.0 million. At June 30, 2009, we had no borrowings outstanding
under this facility and $50.6 million of availability based upon the amount of our eligible
accounts receivable and inventory (and without regard to any financial covenants). The revolving
credit facility expires on October 5, 2009, and provided commercially favorable terms are
available, we plan on entering into a new agreement before or upon expiration.
In February 2007, we issued $275.0 million of senior unsecured notes that are due in 2014. The
offering resulted in net proceeds to us of $270.7 million. The terms of the notes contain
restrictive covenants, including limitations on our ability to incur additional debt, issue
disqualified or preferred stock, make certain restricted payments and enter into certain
significant transactions with shareholders and affiliates. These limitations become more
restrictive if our fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined, is less than 2.0 to 1.0. As of June 30,
2009, we were in compliance with all of our covenants under the notes.
As of June 30, 2009, Axis had approximately $62.2 million outstanding under a credit agreement.
Effective August 5, 2009, we and the other initial partner in the Axis joint venture each acquired
a 50.0% interest in this loan. The purchase price we paid for our 50.0% interest was approximately
$29.5 million, which equaled the then outstanding principal amount of the portion of the loan we
acquired. This loan is described in further detail in Note 22 of our condensed consolidated
financial statements and in Part II Item 5 (Other Information) of this report.
As of June 30, 2009, our investment in approximately 0.4 million shares of Greenbrier common stock
was valued at $2.7 million. The resulting unrealized loss as of June 30, 2009 of $4.2 million was
recognized as accumulated other comprehensive loss within stockholders equity, net of deferred
taxes.
During the first quarter of 2009, Longtrain purchased corporate bonds that mature in 2015 for a
total of $36.8 million. As of June 30, 2009, the investment value of $42.8 million resulted in an
unrealized gain of $6.0 million that was recognized as accumulated other comprehensive income
within stockholders equity, net of deferred taxes. The investment in corporate bonds is high risk.
These bonds return a high yield in exchange for a higher risk.
38
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our net cash provided by or used in operating activities, investing
activities and financing activities for the six months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
40,739 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(48,700 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
(1,318 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(9,171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Cash flows from operating activities are affected by several factors, including fluctuations in
business volume, contract terms for billings and collections, the timing of collections on our
accounts receivables, processing of payroll and associated taxes and payments to our suppliers. We
do not frequently experience business credit losses, although a payment may be delayed pending
completion of closing documentation, and a typical order of railcars may not yield cash proceeds
until after the end of a reporting period.
Our net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $40.7
million. Net earnings of $3.9 million were impacted by non-cash items including but not limited to:
depreciation expense of $11.6 million, joint venture loss of $2.8 million, deferred tax expense of
$1.6 million and other smaller adjustments. Cash provided by operating activities attributable to
changes in our current assets and current liabilities included a decrease in total accounts
receivable, including from affiliates of $11.5 million and a decrease in inventory of $34.2
million. Cash used in operating activities attributable to changes in our current assets and
liabilities included a decrease in total accounts payable, including to affiliates of $22.8 million
and a decrease in accrued expenses and taxes of $3.9 million.
The decrease in total accounts receivable and inventory was primarily due to the decrease in sales
volume and production rates. The decrease in total accounts payable relates to decreased inventory
levels as well as timing of payments made.
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $48.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009,
including $10.0 million of capital expenditures for the purchase of property, plant and equipment,
$36.8 million of purchases of short-term investments of available-for-sale securities and $1.8
million equity contribution to one of our joint ventures. The capital expenditures were for the
purchase of equipment at multiple locations to increase capacity and operating efficiencies. Some
of these purchases are described in further detail below under Capital Expenditures. The
short-term investments purchased were corporate bonds that we classified as available-for-sale.
Net Cash Used In Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. This
was primarily the dividend payments made by us in the first and second quarters of 2009. In August
2009, our board of directors suspended the quarterly dividend.
Capital Expenditures
We continuously evaluate facility requirements based on our strategic plans, production
requirements and market demand and may elect to change our level of capital investments in the
future. These investments are all based on an analysis of the rates of return and impact on our
profitability. We are pursuing opportunities to reduce our costs through continued vertical
integration of component parts. From time to time, we may expand our business, domestically or
abroad, by acquiring other businesses or pursuing other strategic growth opportunities including,
without limitation, joint ventures. We expect to continue to invest in projects, including possible
strategic acquisitions, to reduce manufacturing costs, improve production efficiencies, maintain
our equipment and to otherwise complement and expand our business.
39
Capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were $10.0 million and our current
capital expenditure plans include an additional $26.0 million of projects and investments. These
capital expenditures include projects that maintain equipment, expand capacity, improve
efficiencies or reduce costs, as well as fund investments in joint ventures. These expenditures and
investments do not include the approximately $29.5 million we spent in connection with the August
5, 2009, purchase of 50.0% of the loans under the Axis credit agreement described above. These
projects may also include expenditures to further integrate our supply chain. The amount set forth
above is an estimate only. We cannot assure that we will be able to complete any of our projects on
a timely basis or within budget, if at all.
We anticipate that any future expansion of our business will be financed through existing
resources, cash flow from operations, term debt associated directly with that expenditure or other
new financing. We believe that these sources of funds will provide sufficient liquidity to meet our
expected operating requirements over the next twelve months. We cannot guarantee that we will be
able to obtain term debt or other new financing on favorable terms, if at all.
Our long-term liquidity is contingent upon future operating performance and our ability to continue
to meet financial covenants under our indenture and our revolving credit facility, as amended, and
any other indebtedness. We may also require additional capital in the future to fund capital
expenditures, acquisitions or other investments. Our current revolving credit facility expires in
October 2009. These capital requirements could be substantial. Certain risks, trends and
uncertainties may adversely affect our long-term liquidity.
Dividends
In August 2009, our board of directors suspended the quarterly dividend. Prior to that, during each
quarter since our initial public offering in January 2006, our board of directors declared and
paid cash dividends of $0.03 per share of our common stock.
Contingencies and Contractual Obligations
Refer to the updated status of contingencies in Note 14 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements. Except for normal operating changes, our contingencies and contractual obligations did
not materially change from the information disclosed in our Annual Report.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The critical accounting policies and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements
that we believe affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our
consolidated financial statements presented in this report are described in Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements included in our Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
There have been no material changes to the critical accounting policies or estimates during the six
months ended June 30, 2009.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Except for the following, there has been no material change in our market risks since December 31,
2008.
We hold available-for-sale investments that are reported at fair value as of the reporting date on
our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The carrying values of available-for-sale investments
subject to price risks are based on quoted market prices of the equity security or bond as of the
balance sheet date. Market prices are subject to fluctuation and, consequently, the amount realized
in the settlement of an investment may significantly differ from the reported market value.
Fluctuation in the market price of an equity security or bond may result from perceived changes in
the economic characteristics of the issuer of the security or bond, the relative price of
alternative investments and general market conditions.
Based on the balance as of June 30, 2009, we estimate that in the event of a 10.0% decline in fair
value of the Greenbrier common stock, the fair value of our investment would decrease by $0.3
million.
40
Our investment in corporate bonds is high risk. These bonds return a high yield in exchange for a
higher risk. Based on the balance as of June 30, 2009, we estimate that in the event of a 10.0%
decline in fair value of the corporate bonds, the fair value of our investment would decrease by
$4.3 million.
The selected hypothetical changes do not reflect what may be considered the best or worst case
scenarios. Indeed, results could differ materially due to the nature of equity markets.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, our management evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of
the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Evaluation Date). Based
upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of
the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods
specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ARI was named the defendant in a lawsuit, OCI Chemical Corporation v. American Railcar Industries,
Inc., in which the plaintiff, OCI Chemical Company (OCI), claims the Company was responsible for
the damage caused by allegedly defective railcars that were manufactured by ARI. The lawsuit was
filed on September 19, 2005, in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri. A
trial was scheduled for April 20, 2009, at which time this case was settled at a loss that was
included in our financial results as of June 30, 2009.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors previously
disclosed in Item 1A of our Annual Report.
We depend upon a small number of customers that represent a large percentage of our revenues. The
loss of any single significant customer, a reduction in sales to any such significant customer or
any such significant customers inability to pay us in a timely manner could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Railcars are typically sold pursuant to large, periodic orders, and therefore, a limited number of
customers typically represent a significant percentage of our railcar sales in any given year. Our
top ten customers based on consolidated revenues represented, in the aggregate, approximately
90.7%, 87.9% and 87.1% of our total consolidated revenues in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Moreover, our top three customers based on revenues represented, in the aggregate, approximately
82.0%, 80.1% and 59.9% of our total consolidated revenues in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In
2008, sales to each of these top three customers represented approximately 45.2%, 24.6% and 12.2%
of our total consolidated revenues. In addition, one of our customers accounted for 42.4% of our
backlog as of December 31, 2008. The loss of any significant portion of our sales to any major
customer, the loss of a single major customer or a material adverse change in the financial
condition of any one of our major customers could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and financial results. If one of our significant customers
was unable to pay due to financial conditions, it could materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
41
For example, CIT, our largest customer, recently announced that if it is unsuccessful in its
efforts to complete an ongoing tender offer for certain of its notes due in August 2009, or to
effectuate a comprehensive restructuring of its liabilities, CIT may be forced to seek bankruptcy
relief. CIT accounted for approximately 13.0% and approximately 31.0% of our revenues in the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and accounts for approximately 53.0% of our
backlog as of June 30, 2009. In the event of bankruptcy for whatever reason, CIT, among other
things, may have the right to cancel or could renegotiate its orders included in our backlog. Even
if CIT does not seek bankruptcy relief, any continued financial difficulties of CIT could
materially adversely affect our business relationships with CIT and
could materially adversely affect
our business, prospects and financial condition.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
At the Companys Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 10, 2009, stockholders elected nine
incumbent directors for a one-year term. The vote tabulation follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominee |
|
For |
|
|
Withheld |
|
Carl C. Icahn |
|
|
14,312,086 |
|
|
|
5,598,611 |
|
James J. Unger |
|
|
14,449,392 |
|
|
|
5,461,305 |
|
Vincent J. Intrieri |
|
|
14,242,958 |
|
|
|
5,667,739 |
|
James C. Pontious |
|
|
19,756,443 |
|
|
|
154,254 |
|
James M. Laisure |
|
|
19,746,535 |
|
|
|
164,162 |
|
Harold First |
|
|
19,666,397 |
|
|
|
244,300 |
|
Brett Icahn |
|
|
14,291,832 |
|
|
|
5,618,865 |
|
Hunter Gary |
|
|
14,391,611 |
|
|
|
5,549,086 |
|
Stephen Mongillo |
|
|
14,363,085 |
|
|
|
5,547,612 |
|
The stockholders also voted to authorize and approve a change of the Companys domicile from
Delaware to North Dakota, 18,420,057 for and 31,972 votes against.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Purchase of Axis Loan
Axis is the borrower under a Credit Agreement, dated as of December 28, 2007 (as amended, the Axis
Credit Agreement). Under the Axis Credit Agreement, the original lenders made financing available
to Axis in an aggregate amount of up to $70.0 million, consisting of up to $60.0 million in term
loans and up to $10.0 million in revolving loans. Generally, Axis obligations under the Axis
Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of Axis real and personal property, as well as
by a pledge of the equity in Axis owned by Axis HoldCo. The Company guaranteed 50.0% of Axis
obligations under the Axis Credit Agreement. The remaining 50.0% was guaranteed by Amsted
Industries Incorporated (Amsted), which, through its wholly-owned subsidiary (the Amsted Lender)
also has a 39.7% ownership interest in Axis HoldCo. Additionally,
Axis HoldCo guaranteed 100.0% of
Axis obligations under the Axis Credit Agreement.
In July 2009, the administrative agent under the Axis Credit Agreement alleged that Axis was in
default under the Axis Credit Agreement and in connection therewith proposed certain amendments to
the Axis Credit Agreement. Axis disputed the alleged default. Following discussions among the
administrative agent, Axis, Amsted and the Company, a Master Assignment Agreement, dated as of
August 5, 2009 (the Master Assignment Agreement) was entered into among the then administrative
agent and lenders under the Axis Credit Agreement, the Company, ARI Component, Amsted, the Amsted
Lender and Axis. Pursuant to the Master Assignment Agreement, ARI Component purchased 50.0% of the
loans under the Axis Credit Agreement and the Amsted Lender purchased the remaining 50.0%.
Additionally, under the Master Assignment Agreement, ARI Component and the Amsted Lender have
become co-administrative agents under the Axis Credit Agreement. As of August 5, 2009,
approximately $59.1
million in terms loans were outstanding and zero in revolving loans were outstanding. The purchase
price paid by each of ARI Component and the Amsted Lender for their respective 50.0% interests
equaled 50.0% of the then outstanding principal amount of the loan. Concurrently with the execution
of the Master Assignment Agreement, the Axis Credit Agreement was amended to make certain
modifications, among other things, to waive the default alleged by the prior administrative agent
and to reflect current market conditions. One such modification is that the Company and Amsted no
longer guarantee the obligations under the Axis Credit Agreement.
42
Subject to certain limitations, at the election of Axis, the interest rate for the loans under the
Axis Credit Agreement is based on LIBOR or the prime rate. For LIBOR-based loans, the interest rate
is equal to the greater of 7.75% or adjusted LIBOR plus 4.75%. For prime-based loans, the interest
rate is equal to the greater of 7.75% or the prime rate plus 2.5%. In either case, the interest
rate is subject to increase upon the occurrence of certain defaults. Interest on LIBOR-based loans
is due and payable, at the election of Axis, every one, two, three or six months, and interest on
prime-based loans is due and payable quarterly. Additionally, at Axis election, until December 31,
2010, interest may be payable by increasing the outstanding principal amount of the term loans by
the amount of interest otherwise due and payable in cash.
The commitment to make term loans under the Axis Credit Agreement expires on December 31, 2010.
Beginning on March 31, 2011, the term loans will become due and payable on the last day of each
fiscal quarter in twenty-two equal installments, with the last payment to become due on June 26,
2016. The commitment to make revolving loans under the Axis Credit Agreement will expire and the
revolving loans will become due and payable on December 28, 2012. Upon certain events described
more fully in the Axis Credit Agreement, principal and interest may become due and payable sooner
than described above.
Subject to borrowing base availability, Axis may borrow revolving loans up to the $10.0 million
limit described above, of which ARI Component will be responsible to fund 50.0%, up to $5.0
million. Additionally, subject to the terms of the Axis Credit Agreement, Axis may borrow term
loans up to the remaining unfunded amount of approximately $0.9 million, of which ARI Component
will be responsible to fund 50.0%, up to $0.5 million.
43
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
3.1 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of American Railcar
Industries, Inc., a North Dakota corporation (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to ARIs Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
with the SEC on June 30, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Bylaws of American Railcar Industries, Inc., a North Dakota
corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to ARIs
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 30, 2009) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a), 15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a), 15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
44
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMERICAN RAILCAR INDUSTRIES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 7, 2009
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ James Cowan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Cowan,
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Dale C. Davies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dale C. Davies,
Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer |
45
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
3.1 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of American Railcar
Industries, Inc., a North Dakota corporation (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to ARIs Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
with the SEC on June 30, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Bylaws of American Railcar Industries, Inc., a North Dakota
corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to ARIs
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 30, 2009) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a), 15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a), 15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
46