e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended July 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from N/A to N/A
Commission file number 0-1424
ADC Telecommunications, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Minnesota
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
41-0743912
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
13625 Technology Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2252
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(952) 938-8080
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ YES o NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
o YES o NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
o YES þ NO
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
Common
stock, $.20 par value: 96,625,951 shares as of August 31, 2009
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSUNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
511.6 |
|
|
$ |
631.4 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of reserves of $14.9 and $17.3 |
|
|
173.7 |
|
|
|
215.4 |
|
Unbilled revenue |
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
|
Inventories, net of reserves of $43.5 and $50.7 |
|
|
140.0 |
|
|
|
162.7 |
|
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
879.3 |
|
|
|
1,077.4 |
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $429.1 and $407.7 |
|
|
166.9 |
|
|
|
177.1 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
359.3 |
|
Intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $139.8 and $126.3 |
|
|
94.9 |
|
|
|
161.1 |
|
Long-term available-for-sale securities |
|
|
76.0 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
|
86.3 |
|
Long-term assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,322.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,921.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREOWNERS INVESTMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term notes payable |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
77.8 |
|
|
|
99.1 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
53.4 |
|
|
|
78.1 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
60.7 |
|
|
|
71.0 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Restructuring accrual |
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
210.8 |
|
|
|
278.0 |
|
Pension obligations and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
81.5 |
|
|
|
78.1 |
|
Long-term notes payable |
|
|
651.0 |
|
|
|
650.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
943.3 |
|
|
|
1,006.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareowners Investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96.6 and 111.3 shares outstanding, respectively) |
|
|
379.4 |
|
|
|
914.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareowners investment |
|
$ |
1,322.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,921.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSUNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
August 1, 2008 |
|
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
August 1, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except earnings per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
251.2 |
|
|
$ |
341.4 |
|
|
$ |
719.5 |
|
|
$ |
988.2 |
|
Services |
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
|
|
93.3 |
|
|
|
115.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
283.4 |
|
|
|
381.8 |
|
|
|
812.8 |
|
|
|
1,104.1 |
|
Cost of Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
159.0 |
|
|
|
216.3 |
|
|
|
469.2 |
|
|
|
611.8 |
|
Services |
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
|
|
|
76.1 |
|
|
|
99.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of sales |
|
|
184.7 |
|
|
|
251.2 |
|
|
|
545.3 |
|
|
|
711.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
98.7 |
|
|
|
130.6 |
|
|
|
267.5 |
|
|
|
392.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
54.7 |
|
|
|
63.0 |
|
Selling and administration |
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
83.0 |
|
|
|
200.9 |
|
|
|
249.6 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
85.6 |
|
|
|
104.8 |
|
|
|
683.0 |
|
|
|
314.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
(415.5 |
) |
|
|
77.6 |
|
Other income (loss), net |
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
|
|
(9.5 |
) |
|
|
(33.2 |
) |
|
|
(70.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
(448.7 |
) |
|
|
7.3 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
(446.5 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total discontinued operations |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
|
$ |
(454.5 |
) |
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding (Basic) |
|
|
96.6 |
|
|
|
117.7 |
|
|
|
97.5 |
|
|
|
117.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding (Diluted) |
|
|
97.8 |
|
|
|
118.3 |
|
|
|
97.5 |
|
|
|
118.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
(4.58 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
(4.66 |
) |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
(4.58 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
(4.66 |
) |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSUNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
August 1, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(446.5 |
) |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) from continuing operations to net cash provided by
operating activities from continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in inventory reserves |
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
366.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Write-down of cost method investment |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Intangibles impairment |
|
|
47.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Write-down of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
74.2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
55.2 |
|
|
|
61.4 |
|
Restructuring expenses |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Change in bad debt reserves |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Non-cash stock compensation |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
Change in deferred income taxes |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
Gain/(loss) on sale of property and equipment |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and divestitures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and unbilled revenues decrease |
|
|
45.8 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Inventories decrease/(increase) |
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
Prepaid and other assets decrease |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Accounts payable decrease |
|
|
(22.4 |
) |
|
|
(24.2 |
) |
Accrued liabilities decrease |
|
|
(57.4 |
) |
|
|
(20.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations |
|
|
58.7 |
|
|
|
110.0 |
|
Total cash provided by (used for) operating activities from discontinued operations |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
52.7 |
|
|
|
110.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(199.4 |
) |
Purchase of interest in unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
Divestitures |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Property, equipment and patent additions |
|
|
(25.6 |
) |
|
|
(30.7 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Purchase of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(51.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
Sale of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.7 |
|
Other |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash used for investing activities from continuing operations |
|
|
(79.2 |
) |
|
|
(201.2 |
) |
Total cash used for investing activities from discontinued operations |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(81.5 |
) |
|
|
(201.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
450.0 |
|
Payments of financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
Debt payments |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(218.9 |
) |
Common stock repurchased |
|
|
(94.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash provided by (used for) financing activities |
|
|
(96.7 |
) |
|
|
220.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(119.8 |
) |
|
|
136.3 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
631.4 |
|
|
|
520.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
511.6 |
|
|
$ |
656.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUNAUDITED
Note 1: Basis of Presentation
These interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. The interim information
furnished in this report reflects all normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary, in the
opinion of our management, for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods. The
operating results for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative
of the operating results to be expected for the full fiscal year. These statements should be read
in conjunction with our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October
31, 2008.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, our Board of Directors approved a plan to divest our
German professional services business (APS Germany). In accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144 Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets (SFAS 144), this business was classified as discontinued operations for all periods
presented.
Fiscal Year
Our first three quarters end on the Friday nearest to the end of January, April and July,
respectively.
On July 22, 2008, our Board of Directors approved a change in our fiscal year end from October
31st to September 30th commencing with our fiscal year 2009. This will result in our fiscal year
2009 being shortened from 12 months to 11 months and ending on September 30th.
We plan to file our annual report on Form 10-K for our fiscal 2009 as our transition report.
Accordingly, we are filing this quarterly report for our third quarter of fiscal 2009 ending July
31, 2009, which will be the final Form 10-Q on our present quarterly reporting cycle that
corresponds to an October 31st fiscal year end. We will use our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
fiscal 2009 to transition to a quarterly reporting cycle that corresponds to a September 30th
fiscal year end. Therefore, for financial reporting purposes our fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 will
be shortened from the quarterly period ending October 31st to an approximate two month period
ending September 30th.
Warranty
We provide reserves for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is
recognized. We estimate the costs of our warranty obligations based on our warranty policy or
applicable contractual warranty, our historical experience of known product failure rates, and our
use of materials and service delivery costs incurred in correcting product failures. In addition,
from time to time, specific warranty accruals may be made if unforeseen technical problems arise.
The following table provides detail on the activity in the warranty reserve accrual balance as
of July 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual |
|
Accounting |
|
Charged to costs |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual |
|
|
October 31, 2008 |
|
Adjustments |
|
and expenses |
|
Deductions |
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty Reserve |
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
Share-Based Compensation
Share-based compensation recognized under SFAS No. 123(R) Share-Based Payment: An amendment
of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 123, for the three and nine
months ended July 31, 2009 was $2.5 million and $8.8 million, respectively. Share-based
compensation expense for the three and nine months ended August 1, 2008 was $3.5 million and $12.7
million, respectively.
6
Fair Value of Financial Instruments: At July 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, our financial
instruments included cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts
payable. The fair values of these financial instruments approximated carrying value because of the
nature of these instruments. In addition, we have available-for-sale securities and long-term notes
payable. We estimate the fair market value of our long-term notes payable to be approximately
$400.0 million and $350.0 million at July 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, respectively. See Note 7
for a further discussion of fair value of available-for-sale securities.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
A detailed description of our significant accounting policies can be found in our most recent
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008. We are updating our summary
of significant accounting policies to include:
Fair Value Measurements
Effective November 1, 2008, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157), which provides enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets
and liabilities. The standard applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or
liabilities to be measured at fair value. The standard does not expand the use of fair value in any
new circumstances. The adoption of SFAS 157 had no material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 157-2, Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157 (FSP 157-2). FSP 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities until the beginning of our fiscal year 2010, except for items
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at
least annually). We are currently evaluating the impact that the application of SFAS 157 to
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities may have on our consolidated financial statements.
Our significant nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that may be impacted by the
adoption of FAS 157 include fixed assets and intangible assets.
Effective November 1, 2008, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115
(SFAS 159). Under SFAS 159, a company may choose, at specified election dates, to measure
eligible items at fair value and report unrealized gains and losses in earnings on items for which
the fair value option has been elected at each subsequent reporting date. Since our adoption of
SFAS 159, we have not elected the fair value option for any eligible financial instruments.
Derivatives
Effective January 31, 2009, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FAS 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161
applies to all derivative instruments and non-derivative instruments that are designated and
qualify as hedging instruments and related hedged items accounted for under SFAS No. 133
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133). The provisions of SFAS
161 require entities to provide greater transparency through additional disclosures about (a) how
and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged
items are accounted for under SFAS 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, results of operations
and cash flows.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Effective July 31, 2009, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS
165), which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur
after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued or available to be
issued. SFAS 165 requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated
subsequent events and the basis for that date. We evaluated subsequent events through our filing
date of September 2, 2009. See Note 18 for a discussion about our subsequent events.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That
Are Not Orderly (FSP 157-4), which amends SFAS 157 to provide additional guidance on estimating
fair value when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have significantly
decreased in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. FSP 157-4 also provides
additional guidance on circumstances
7
that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. We have adopted the provisions of FSP
157-4 for our third quarter of fiscal 2009. There was no impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP 107-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments (FSP 107-1), which amends SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments and APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting. FSP 107-1 extends the
requirement to disclose the fair value of financial instruments to interim financial statements. We
have adopted the provisions of FSP 107-1 for our third quarter of fiscal 2009. The adoption of FSP
107-1 requires additional disclosures and did not have an impact on our consolidated statements of
operations or our consolidated balance sheets.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP 115-2 and FSP 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (the FSP). The FSP changes existing guidance for determining
whether an impairment of debt securities is other-than-temporary. The FSP requires
other-than-temporary impairments to be separated into the amount representing the decrease in cash
flows expected to be collected from a security (referred to as credit losses) which is recognized
in earnings and the amount related to other factors (referred to as noncredit losses) which is
recognized in other comprehensive income. This noncredit loss component of the impairment may only
be classified in other comprehensive income if both of the following conditions are met (a) the
holder of the security concludes that it does not intend to sell the security and (b) the holder
concludes that it is more likely than not that the holder will not be required to sell the security
before the security recovers its value. If these conditions are not met, the noncredit loss must
also be recognized in earnings. When adopting the FSP, an entity is required to record a cumulative
effect adjustment as of the beginning of the period of adoption to reclassify the noncredit
component of a previously recognized other-than-temporary impairment from retained earnings to
other comprehensive income. The FSP is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June
15, 2009. We adopted the FSP as of May 2, 2009. Based on our analysis of this FSP, we have
concluded that we do not meet the conditions necessary to recognize the noncredit loss component of
our available-for-sale auction-rate securities in other comprehensive income. Accordingly, we did
not reclassify any previously recognized other-than-temporary impairment losses from retained
earnings to other comprehensive income, thus the adoption of the FSP had no impact on our condensed
consolidated financial statements. Refer to Note 7 and 16 for further discussion of our investments
in available-for-sale securities.
Note 2: Acquisitions
ANIHA
During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, we acquired the outstanding ownership interest in our
ANIHA organization in China from Nitta Corporation, a Japanese corporation, for a cash price of
$0.8 million. In addition to the cash purchase price we agreed to restructure $1.9 million of
previously recorded obligations between us and Nitta Corporation into a single interest bearing
(1.5% per year) note payable, requiring us to pay quarterly principal and interest payments to
Nitta Corporation beginning July 2009 through February 2016. In addition, we agreed to enter into
a contract to purchase from Nitta Corporation a predetermined percentage of our annual requirements
of certain components over the next three years. As a result of this step acquisition the minority
interest previously recorded has been removed from our consolidated balance sheet in the amount of
$2.3 million.
LGC
On December 3, 2007, we completed the acquisition of LGC Wireless, Inc. (LGC), a provider of
in-building wireless solution products, headquartered in San Jose, California. These products
increase the quality and capacity of wireless networks by permitting voice and data signals to
penetrate building structures and by distributing these signals evenly throughout the building. LGC
also offers products that permit voice and data signals to reach remote locations. The acquisition
was made to enable us to participate in this high growth segment of the industry.
We acquired all of the outstanding capital stock and warrants of LGC for $143.3 million in
cash (net of cash acquired). We acquired $58.9 million of intangible assets as part of this
purchase. Goodwill of $85.4 million was recorded in this transaction and assigned to our Network
Solutions segment. This goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes. We also assumed debt of $17.3
million associated with this acquisition, the majority of which was paid off by the second quarter
of fiscal 2008. The results of LGC, subsequent to December 3, 2007, are included in our
consolidated statements of operations.
Option holders of LGC shares were given the opportunity either to receive a cash payment for
their options or exchange their options for options to acquire ADC shares. Certain LGC option
holders received $9.1 million in cash payments for their options. The
8
remaining option holders received ADC options with a fair value of $3.5 million as of the
close of the acquisition. Of this $3.5 million, $3.0 million was added to the purchase price of LGC
and the remaining $0.5 million will be recognized over the remaining vesting period that ends in
September 2011.
Of the purchase price, $15.5 million was placed in escrow for up to 15 months following the
close of the transaction. As of May 1, 2009, $2.7 million of the total escrow amount had been
released to us to settle certain indemnity claims under the purchase agreement. The $2.7 million
payment was accounted for as a return of consideration and decreased goodwill accordingly. We have
also since reached an agreement with LGC to release to us an additional $1.2 million of escrow for
the final settlement of certain indemnity claims. Since the recovery of the $1.2 million was not
considered probable, we did not record a receivable related to this amount in purchase accounting.
Therefore, the entire $1.2 million was recognized as a reduction to operating expense during the
third quarter of fiscal 2009 when it was received. As a result of this settlement, the remaining
funds held in the escrow were released to the former LGC shareholders and the escrow agreement was
terminated.
The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price to the fair values of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 3, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
44.9 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
58.9 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
85.4 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
192.5 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
42.9 |
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
45.4 |
|
Net assets acquired |
|
|
147.1 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
Cash acquired |
|
|
0.8 |
|
LGC Options exchanged for ADC Options |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash paid |
|
$ |
143.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Century Man
On January 10, 2008, we completed the acquisition of Shenzhen Century Man Communication
Equipment Co., Ltd. and certain affiliated entities (Century Man), a leading provider of
communication distribution frame solutions, headquartered in Shenzhen, China. The acquisition was
made to accelerate our growth in the Chinese connectivity market, as well as provide us with
additional products designed to meet the needs of customers in developing markets outside of China.
We acquired Century Man for $52.3 million in cash (net of cash acquired). The former
shareholders of Century Man may be paid up to an additional $15.0 million (the earn out) if,
during the three years following closing, certain financial results are achieved by the acquired
business. We paid the first $5.0 million installment of this earn out in March 2009. In addition, a
$0.4 million payment was made to the former shareholders for the effect of changes in foreign
exchange rates on the installment payment. These amounts were recorded as increases to the goodwill
associated with these transactions.
Of the purchase price, $7.5 million was placed in escrow for up to 24 months following the
close of the transaction. Of the $7.5 million, $7.0 million relates to potential indemnification
claims and $0.5 million relates to the disposition of certain properties. As of July 31, 2009, $3.5
million of the total escrow amount had been released to the former shareholders of Century Man. In
addition, a $0.3 million payment was made to the former shareholders for the effect of changes in
foreign exchange rates on the amount of escrow released in accordance with the escrow agreement.
This payment was accounted for as additional contingent consideration and increased goodwill
accordingly.
We acquired $13.0 million of intangible assets as part of this purchase. Goodwill of $36.7
million was recorded in this transaction and assigned to our Global Connectivity Solutions
(Connectivity) segment. This goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes. The results of Century
Man, subsequent to January 10, 2008, are included in our consolidated statements of operations.
9
The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price to the fair values of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 10, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
33.1 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
13.0 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
36.7 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
83.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
26.0 |
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
|
57.3 |
|
Less cash acquired |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash paid |
|
$ |
52.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-Forma Results of Operations
Unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations, as though the acquisitions of LGC and
Century Man were completed at the beginning of fiscal 2008, are (in millions, except per share
data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,128.6 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
3.8 |
|
Net income |
|
|
6.0 |
|
Income from continuing operations per share basic and diluted |
|
|
0.03 |
|
Net income per share basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
The allocation of the purchase prices for LGC and Century Man to the assets and liabilities
acquired was finalized in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and did not result in any material
adjustments. See Note 8 for a discussion of the goodwill and intangible asset impairments recorded
in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
Note 3: Discontinued Operations
APS Germany
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, our Board of Directors approved a plan to divest APS
Germany. We classified this business as a discontinued operation in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2008. This business was previously included in our Professional Services segment. On July 31, 2009,
we sold all of the capital stock of our subsidiary that operated our APS Germany business to telent
Investments Limited for a cash purchase price of $3.3 million, subject to a customary working
capital adjustment. During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, we recognized a loss on this sale in
the amount of $4.6 million.
The financial results of our APS Germany business are reported separately as discontinued
operations for all periods presented in accordance with SFAS 144. The financial results of our APS
Germany business included in discontinued operations are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
8.3 |
|
|
$ |
18.9 |
|
|
$ |
27.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(1.8 |
) |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
(3.4 |
) |
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
Loss on sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(6.4 |
) |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
(8.0 |
) |
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Note 4: Net Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Per Share
The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of basic and
diluted income (loss) per share from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions, except |
|
|
(In millions, except |
|
|
|
per share amounts) |
|
|
per share amounts) |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
13.4 |
|
|
$ |
(446.5 |
) |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
Interest expense for convertible notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations diluted |
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
13.4 |
|
|
$ |
(446.5 |
) |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
|
|
96.6 |
|
|
|
117.7 |
|
|
|
97.5 |
|
|
|
117.7 |
|
Convertible bonds converted to common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee options and other |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
97.8 |
|
|
|
118.3 |
|
|
|
97.5 |
|
|
|
118.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
(4.58 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
(4.58 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluded from the dilutive securities described above are employee stock options to acquire
6.2 million and 6.7 million shares for the three months ended July 31, 2009, and August 1, 2008,
respectively. Also excluded are employee stock options to acquire 7.6 million and 6.8 million
shares for the nine months ended July 31, 2009 and August 1, 2008, respectively. These exclusions
are made if the exercise prices of these options are greater than the average market price of our
common stock for the period, if the number of shares we can repurchase with all the forms of
exercise proceeds exceeds the weighted shares outstanding in the options, or if we have net losses,
all of which have an anti-dilutive effect.
We are required to use the if-converted method for computing diluted earnings per share with
respect to the shares reserved for issuance upon conversion of our convertible notes (described in
detail below). Under this method, we add back the interest expense on the convertible notes to net
income and then divide this amount by our total outstanding shares, including those shares reserved
for issuance upon conversion of the notes. The following details our convertible notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Shares |
|
|
Conversion |
|
Convertible Subordinated Notes |
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
August 1, 2008 |
|
|
Price |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
$200 million, 1.0% fixed rate, paid June 15, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
28.091 |
|
$200 million, 6-month LIBOR plus 0.375%, due June 15, 2013 |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
28.091 |
|
$225 million, 3.5% fixed rate, due July 15, 2015 |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
27.000 |
|
$225 million, 3.5% fixed rate, due July 15, 2017 |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
28.550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to June 15, 2008, the 2008 notes and 2013 notes were evaluated for dilution effects
together by adding back their associated interest expense and dividing this amount by our total
shares, including all 14.2 million shares that could be issued upon conversion of these notes.
These notes were evaluated together for dilution effects as the conversion price was the same on
both. Since the 2008 notes have been paid, the 2013 notes are now evaluated alone by adding back
the appropriate interest expense and dividing this amount by our total shares, including the 7.1
million shares that could be issued upon conversion of these notes. Additionally, the 2015 notes
and 2017 notes are evaluated separately by adding back the appropriate interest expense from each
and dividing by our total shares, including all 8.3 million and 7.9 million shares, respectively,
that could be issued upon conversion of each of these notes. Based upon these calculations, all
shares reserved for issuance upon conversion of our convertible notes were excluded for the three
and nine months ended July 31, 2009 and August 1, 2008, because of their anti-dilutive effect.
11
Note 5: Inventories
Our inventories are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Manufactured products |
|
$ |
113.5 |
|
|
$ |
132.9 |
|
Purchased materials |
|
|
63.0 |
|
|
|
73.1 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
Less: Inventory reserve |
|
|
(43.5 |
) |
|
|
(50.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories, net |
|
$ |
140.0 |
|
|
$ |
162.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6: Property and Equipment
Our property and equipment are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Land and buildings |
|
$ |
135.6 |
|
|
$ |
134.7 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
409.0 |
|
|
|
404.6 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
38.9 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(429.1 |
) |
|
|
(407.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
155.1 |
|
|
|
170.5 |
|
Construction-in-progress |
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
166.9 |
|
|
$ |
177.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7: Investments
As of July 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, our available-for-sale securities consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-Than- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Basis |
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
50.7 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51.1 |
|
Auction-rate securities |
|
|
169.8 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
24.9 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
220.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
(18.1 |
) |
|
$ |
76.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Auction-rate securities |
|
|
169.8 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(100.6 |
) |
|
|
40.4 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
169.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
(100.6 |
) |
|
$ |
40.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net of cumulative unrealized gains of $3.2 million and other-than-temporary losses of $148.1 million |
|
(2) |
|
Net of cumulative losses of $130.0 million |
Securities classified as available-for-sale are carried at estimated fair value with
unrealized gains and losses, net of tax if applicable, recorded as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss). Upon the sale of a security classified as available-for-sale the
amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings is based on the
specific identification method.
As of July 31, 2009, we held auction-rate securities with a fair value of $24.9 million and an
original par value of $169.8 million, which are classified as long-term. During the nine months
ended July 31, 2009 and the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008, we recorded other-than-temporary
impairment charges of $18.1 million and $100.6 million, respectively, to reduce the fair value of
our holdings in auction-rate securities to $24.9 million. Current capital market conditions have significantly reduced our ability to liquidate our remaining auction-rate securities. We may not be able to liquidate any of these auction-rate securities until either a future auction is successful or, in the event secondary market sales become available, we decide to sell the securities in a secondary market. A secondary market sale of any of these securities could take a significant amount of time to complete and could potentially result in a further loss.
All of our auction-rate security investments have made their scheduled interest payments based
on a par value of $169.8 million at July 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, with the exception of
certain of our investments having a combined par value of $49.0 million and $16.8 million,
respectively, all of which have been fully written off. In addition, the interest rates have been
set to the maximum rate defined for the issuer.
Due to the failed auction status and lack of liquidity in the market for such securities, the
valuation methodology includes certain assumptions that were not supported by prices from
observable current market transactions in the same instruments nor were they based on observable
market data. With the assistance of the valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of the
auction-rate securities based on the following: (1) the underlying structure of each security; (2)
the present value of future principal and interest payments discounted at rates considered to
reflect current market conditions; (3) consideration of the probabilities of default, passing
auction, or earning the maximum rate for each period; and (4) estimates of the recovery rates in
the event of defaults for each security. These estimated fair values could change significantly
based on future market conditions.
We have commenced arbitration against Merrill Lynch and its agent/broker who worked on our
account in connection with their sale of auction-rate securities to us. The par value of the
auction-rate securities at issue in our claim is approximately $138.0 million. We presently expect
our arbitration hearing to take place during June 2010. Lehman Brothers sold us all other
auction-rate-securities that we hold. We have made a claim in the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy
proceeding with respect to these securities, however, we are uncertain whether we will recover any
of our losses associated with these securities at this time.
During fiscal 2009, we purchased $51.4 million, including accrued interest, of unsecured notes
backed by a guarantee from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The contractual
maturity of these notes is December 1, 2010.
During fiscal 2009, we also invested an additional $1.2 million in ip.access, Ltd. a U.K.
based company. During fiscal 2008, we invested $4.0 million and $1.2 million in ip.access, Ltd.
and E-Band Communications Corporation, respectively. These investments were accounted for under the
cost method and are included in the other assets line item of the balance sheet. We regularly
evaluate the recoverability of these investments based on the performance and financial position of
these companies. As a result of this analysis, we recorded a $3.0 million other-than-temporary
impairment of our investment in E-Band Communications Corporation during fiscal 2009.
During fiscal 2008, we received proceeds of $39.7 million and recorded a nominal realized gain
related to the sale of a portion of our available-for-sale securities. There were no sales of
available-for-sale securities in fiscal 2009.
12
Note 8: Goodwill and Intangible Assets
We review goodwill annually for impairment, or more frequently if potential interim indicators
exist that could result in impairment. The current global recession and related adverse business
conditions have resulted in reduced estimates to our near-term cash flow and a sustained decline in
our market capitalization. Due to these factors, during the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we
performed a goodwill impairment analysis of our two reporting units that contain goodwill,
Connectivity and Network Solutions. The analysis resulted in the recognition of impairment charges
for both reporting units. In our analysis, the fair values of each of the reporting units were
estimated for the purpose of goodwill impairment testing by applying the present value of
forecasted future cash flows, using estimates, judgments and assumptions that management believed
were appropriate for the circumstances. We also considered market approaches as well as the cost
approach in estimating fair value. In performing the goodwill impairment analysis, we, among other
things, consulted with an independent advisor.
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that their
carrying amount may not be recoverable. Based on recent business conditions, an impairment review
of long-lived assets was performed in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The review resulted in the
recognition of an impairment charge related to the intangible assets of the Network Solutions
segment. The fair value of the impaired assets was estimated by applying the present value of
forecasted future cash flows, using estimates, judgments and assumptions that management believed
were appropriate for the circumstances. In preparing the estimated fair value of the impaired
assets, we, among other things, consulted with an independent advisor.
As of our first quarter of fiscal 2009, we recorded an estimated impairment charge of $413.5
million to reduce the carrying value of goodwill and other long-lived intangibles. The estimated
impairment includes $280.8 million of goodwill related to Connectivity and $85.4 million of
goodwill and $47.3 million of intangibles related to Network Solutions. We finalized this analysis
in connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the second quarter of fiscal
2009. We recognized an additional goodwill impairment charge of $0.4 million related to
Connectivity in the three months ended May 1, 2009. We believe that our reduced estimates of
financial performance do not materially impact our liquidity position or our ability to execute our
business strategy.
13
The following are changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended July
31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Network |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connectivity |
|
|
Solutions |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of October 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
274.0 |
|
|
$ |
85.3 |
|
|
$ |
359.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustments |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Impairment |
|
|
(281.2 |
) |
|
|
(85.4 |
) |
|
|
(366.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the acquisition of LGC, we recorded intangible assets of $58.9 million
related to customer relationships and technology. As previously described, these intangibles were
subsequently impaired. In connection with the acquisition of Century Man, we recorded intangible
assets of $13.0 million related to customer relationships, technology and non-compete agreements,
which were not impacted by the impairments described above.
Note 9: Income Taxes
Our income tax expense of $0.4 million for the three months ended July 31, 2009 primarily
relates to foreign income taxes. Our income tax benefit of $2.2 million for the nine months ended
July 31, 2009 primarily relates to the reversal of deferred tax liabilities attributable to U.S.
tax amortization of purchased goodwill from the acquisition of KRONE, partially offset by foreign
income taxes. The reversal of these deferred tax liabilities resulted from the goodwill impairment
charge discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements.
As of July 31, 2009, our net deferred tax assets were $1,056.9 million with a related
valuation allowance of $1,002.5 million. Deferred tax assets represent future tax benefits to be
received when certain expenses and losses previously recognized in the financial statements become
deductible under applicable income tax laws. The realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on
future taxable income against which these deductions can be applied. We establish a valuation
allowance when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets will not
be realized, and record periodic adjustments to the valuation allowance when there are changes in
the evidence of realizability.
Most of our deferred tax assets are related to U.S. income tax net operating losses and are
not expected to expire until after fiscal 2021, with the exception of $210.9 million relating to
capital loss carryforwards that can be utilized only against realized capital gains through fiscal
2009.
As of July 31, 2009, the gross amount of unrecognized income tax benefits (excluding interest
and penalties) was $28.3 million. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if
recognized, would impact the effective tax rate was $10.4 million. As of July 31, 2009, the amount
accrued for interest and penalties related to unrecognized income tax benefits was $2.8 million. We
recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized income tax benefits in income tax
expense.
14
Note 10: Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) has no impact on our net income (loss) but is reflected in our
balance sheet through adjustments to shareowners investment. Comprehensive income (loss) is
derived from foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains (losses) and related
adjustments on available-for-sale securities and hedging activities.
The components of comprehensive income (loss) are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
|
$ |
(454.5 |
) |
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
Change in cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Net change in fair value of interest rate swap |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
Net change in fair value of Mexican peso hedge |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on other available-for-sale securities |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on auction-rate securities |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
21.2 |
|
|
$ |
(448.7 |
) |
|
$ |
11.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no net tax impact for the components of comprehensive income due to the valuation
allowance.
Note 11: Segment and Geographic Information
We are organized into operating segments based on product groupings. The reportable segments
are determined in accordance with how our executive managers develop and execute our global
strategies to drive growth and profitability. These strategies include product positioning,
research and development programs, cost management, capacity and capital investments for each of
the reportable segments. Segment performance is evaluated on several factors, including operating
income. Segment operating income excludes restructuring and impairment charges, interest income or
expense, other income or expense and provision for income taxes. Assets are not allocated to the
segments.
Our three reportable business segments are:
|
|
|
Connectivity |
|
|
|
|
Network Solutions |
|
|
|
|
Professional Services |
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, management initiated a restructuring of the Network
Solutions segment by exiting several outdoor wireless product lines. During the first quarter of
fiscal 2009, management made further changes to the Network Solutions segment by moving our
Wireline solutions business to the Connectivity segment in order to better manage and utilize
resources and drive profitability. As a result of this change, we have changed our reportable
segments to conform to our current management reporting presentation. We have reclassified prior
year segment disclosures to conform to the new segment presentation.
Our Connectivity products connect wireline, wireless, cable, enterprise and broadcast
communications networks over fiber-optic, copper (twisted pair), coaxial and wireless media. These
products provide the physical interconnections between network components and access points into
networks.
Our Network Solutions products help improve coverage and capacity for wireless networks. These
products improve signal quality, expand coverage and capacity into expanded geographic areas,
increase the speed and expand the delivery and capacity of networks, and help reduce the capital
and operating costs of delivering wireless services. Applications for these products include
in-building solutions, outdoor coverage solutions and mobile network solutions.
Our Professional Services business provides integration services for broadband and
multiservice communications over wireline, wireless, cable and enterprise networks. Our
Professional Services business unit helps customers plan, deploy and maintain communications
networks that deliver Internet, data, video and voice services.
15
We have two significant customers who each account for more than 10% of our net sales. For the
three months ended July 31, 2009 and August 1, 2008, AT&T accounted for 20.9% and 17.2%,
respectively, of our net sales. For the nine months ended July 31, 2009 and August 1, 2008, AT&T
accounted for 20.1% and 17.4%, respectively, of our net sales. Verizon accounted for 18.2% and
16.8% of our net sales in the three months ended July 31, 2009 and August 1, 2008, respectively.
Also, Verizon accounted for 18.4% and 17.7% of our net sales in the nine months ended July 31, 2009
and August 1, 2008, respectively. Net sales from AT&T and Verizon are included in each of our three
reportable segments.
The following table sets forth certain financial information for each of our above described
reportable segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Network |
|
|
Professional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
GAAP |
|
|
|
Connectivity |
|
|
Solutions |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
and Impairment |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended July 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
226.5 |
|
|
$ |
15.3 |
|
|
$ |
9.4 |
|
|
$ |
251.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
251.2 |
|
Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
28.2 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total external net sales |
|
$ |
226.5 |
|
|
$ |
19.3 |
|
|
$ |
37.6 |
|
|
$ |
283.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
283.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
14.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
16.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16.2 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
27.3 |
|
|
$ |
(11.4 |
) |
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
18.5 |
|
|
$ |
(5.4 |
) |
|
$ |
13.1 |
|
Three Months Ended August 1, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
304.3 |
|
|
$ |
24.8 |
|
|
$ |
12.3 |
|
|
$ |
341.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
341.4 |
|
Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
33.1 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total external net sales |
|
$ |
304.3 |
|
|
$ |
32.1 |
|
|
$ |
45.4 |
|
|
$ |
381.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
381.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
16.5 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
20.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20.9 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
34.7 |
|
|
$ |
(9.5 |
) |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
25.9 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
25.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Network |
|
|
Professional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
GAAP |
|
|
|
Connectivity |
|
|
Solutions |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
and Impairment |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
643.8 |
|
|
$ |
47.0 |
|
|
$ |
28.7 |
|
|
$ |
719.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
719.5 |
|
Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
80.5 |
|
|
|
93.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total external net sales |
|
$ |
643.8 |
|
|
$ |
59.8 |
|
|
$ |
109.2 |
|
|
$ |
812.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
812.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
47.6 |
|
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
55.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
55.2 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
38.8 |
|
|
$ |
(30.1 |
) |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
11.9 |
|
|
$ |
(427.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(415.5 |
) |
Nine Months Ended August 1, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
872.2 |
|
|
$ |
78.9 |
|
|
$ |
37.1 |
|
|
$ |
988.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
988.2 |
|
Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
|
115.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total external net sales |
|
$ |
872.2 |
|
|
$ |
95.9 |
|
|
$ |
136.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,104.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,104.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
47.9 |
|
|
$ |
11.0 |
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
61.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
61.4 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
105.8 |
|
|
$ |
(24.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
|
$ |
79.9 |
|
|
$ |
(2.3 |
) |
|
$ |
77.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Geographic Information
The following table sets forth certain geographic information concerning our U.S. and foreign
net sales and ownership of property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Net Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inside the United States |
|
$ |
172.5 |
|
|
$ |
213.5 |
|
|
$ |
483.4 |
|
|
$ |
644.3 |
|
Outside the United States: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific (excluding China) (Australia, Hong Kong,
India, Japan, Korea, New Zealand, Southeast Asia and
Taiwan) |
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
42.3 |
|
|
|
70.1 |
|
|
|
108.8 |
|
China (1) |
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
60.2 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
EMEA (Europe (excluding Germany), Middle East and Africa) |
|
|
38.4 |
|
|
|
69.4 |
|
|
|
114.5 |
|
|
|
208.6 |
|
Germany (1) |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
Americas (Canada, Central and South America) |
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
|
|
|
76.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
283.4 |
|
|
$ |
381.8 |
|
|
$ |
812.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,104.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment, Net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inside the United States |
|
$ |
109.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outside the United States |
|
|
57.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
166.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Due to the significance of their net sales, China and Germany are broken out for geographic
purposes. |
Other than the U.S., no single country has property and equipment sufficiently material to
disclose.
Note 12: Impairment, Restructuring and Other Disposal Charges
During the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009 and August 1, 2008, we incurred
restructuring charges associated with workforce reductions as well as the consolidation of excess
facilities. For the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009 and August 1, 2008, restructuring
charges resulting from our actions, by category of expenditures, adjusted to exclude those
activities specifically related to discontinued operations, are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Impairments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed asset write-downs |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Goodwill and intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
413.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impairment charges |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee severance |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Facilities consolidation and lease termination |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other disposal charges: Inventory write-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impairment, restructuring and other disposal charges |
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
428.0 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment Charges: See Note 8 to the financial statements for a discussion of the $413.9
million impairment of goodwill and intangible assets.
Restructuring Charges: Restructuring charges include employee severance, other
compensation-related payments, and facility consolidation costs resulting from the closure of
leased facilities and other workforce reductions attributable to our efforts to reduce costs.
During the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009, 28 and 464 employees, respectively, affecting
all business segments were impacted by reductions in force or participated in early retirement
programs. During the three and nine months ended August 1, 2008, 4 and 21 employees, respectively,
in our Connectivity and Network Solutions segments were impacted by reductions in force.
17
The costs of these reductions have been and will be funded through cash from operations. We
had additional reductions in force impacting 303 employees during the second quarter of fiscal
2009, for which we did not incur restructuring charges.
On August 12, 2009, we announced further workforce reductions. See Note 18 for further
discussion of this restructuring event.
Facility consolidation and lease termination expenses represent costs associated with our
decision to consolidate and close duplicative or excess manufacturing and office facilities. During
the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009, we incurred charges of $0.3 million and $0.6
million, respectively. These charges were incurred due to our decision to close unproductive and
excess facilities as well as to the continued softening of real estate markets, which resulted in
estimates of lower sublease income. During the three months ended August 1, 2008, we recorded a
credit of $0.2 million.
Other Disposal Charges: During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we recorded $0.6 million for
the write-off of obsolete inventory related to the exiting of the Lexington, South Carolina
production facility. All inventory charges were recorded as cost of goods sold.
The following table provides detail on our restructuring activity and the remaining accrual
balance by category as of July 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual |
|
|
Operations Net |
|
|
Cash payments |
|
|
Accrual |
|
Type of Charge |
|
October 31, 2008 |
|
|
Additions |
|
|
Charged to accrual |
|
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee severance costs |
|
$ |
8.6 |
|
|
$ |
12.5 |
|
|
$ |
11.3 |
|
|
$ |
9.8 |
|
Facilities consolidation |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring accrual |
|
$ |
16.7 |
|
|
$ |
13.1 |
|
|
$ |
12.5 |
|
|
$ |
17.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the $9.8 million in accrued costs associated with employee severance, we expect that $1.4
million will be paid by the end of fiscal 2009 and that the remaining balance will be paid by the
end of fiscal 2015. Of the $7.5 million in accrued costs associated with the consolidation of
facilities, we expect that $0.4 million will be paid by the end of fiscal 2009 and that the
remaining balance will be paid from unrestricted cash over the respective lease terms of the
facilities through 2015. Based on our intention to continue to consolidate and close duplicative or
excess manufacturing operations in order to reduce our cost structure, we may incur additional
restructuring charges (both cash and non-cash) in future periods. These restructuring charges may
have a material effect on our operating results.
Note 13: Other Income (Loss), Net
Other income (loss), net is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
August, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Interest income on investments |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
|
$ |
25.1 |
|
Interest expense on borrowings |
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
(21.3 |
) |
|
|
(21.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (loss), net |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
3.8 |
|
Write-down of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
(74.2 |
) |
Write-down of cost method investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
Gain (loss) on sale of fixed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
(19.3 |
) |
|
|
(74.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (loss), net |
|
$ |
(7.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(9.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(33.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(70.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009, we recorded impairment charges of $3.2
million and $18.1 million, respectively, on certain auction-rate
securities we hold. During the three and nine months ended August 1, 2008, these charges were $6.0
million and $74.2 million, respectively. As of July 31, 2009, we held auction-rate securities with
a fair value of $24.9 million and an original par value of $169.8 million. Given the current state
of the credit markets, when we prepare our quarterly financial results we will continue to assess
the fair value of our auction-rate securities for substantive changes in relevant market
conditions, changes in financial condition or other changes in these investments. We may be
required to record additional losses for impairment if we determine there are further declines in
fair value that are other-than-temporary.
18
During the first quarter of 2009, we recorded a $3.0 million impairment to write-off our
investment in E-Band Communications Corporation.
The $0.9 million gain on the sale of fixed assets recorded during the nine months ended July
31, 2009 is primarily due to a $1.1 million gain recognized on the sale of our Cheltenham facility
located in the U.K.
The change in net interest income (loss) was predominately due to significantly lower interest
income rates on cash investments.
Note 14: Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Contingencies: We are a party to various lawsuits, proceedings and claims arising in the
ordinary course of business or otherwise. Many of these disputes may be resolved without formal
litigation. The amount of monetary liability resulting from the ultimate resolution of these
matters cannot be determined at this time. As of July 31, 2009, we had recorded $6.3 million in
loss reserves for certain of these matters. In light of the reserves we have recorded, at this time
we believe the ultimate resolution of these lawsuits, proceedings and claims will not have a
material adverse impact on our business, results of operations or financial condition. Because of
the uncertainty inherent in litigation, however, it is possible that unfavorable resolutions of one
or more of these lawsuits, proceedings and claims could exceed the amount currently reserved and
could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
On August 17, 2009, we met with representatives from the Office of the Inspector General of
the United States where we disclosed a potential breach of the country of origin requirements for
certain products sold under a supply agreement with the federal governments General Services
Administration. We self-reported this potential breach as a precautionary matter and it is
unclear at this time whether any penalties will be imposed. Following the meeting, we provided
the Office of the Inspector General with additional documentation related to this matter. We
expect a further response from the Office of Inspector General following its review of this
information.
Change of Control: We maintain certain employee benefits, including severance to key
employees, in the event of a change of control of ADC.
Note 15: Common Stock Repurchase Plan
On August 12, 2008, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program for up to
$150.0 million. The program provided that share repurchases could commence beginning in September
2008 and continue until the earlier of the completion of $150.0 million in share repurchases or
July 31, 2009. In early December 2008, we completed this $150.0 million repurchase program at an
average price of $7.04 per share, resulting in 21.3 million shares being purchased under the
program.
Note 16: Fair Value Measurements and Auction-Rate Securities
Fair value is the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In
determining fair value for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair
value, we consider the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and
assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability.
Fair Value Hierarchy
The fair value hierarchy requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. A financial instruments
categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is
significant to the fair value measurement. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to
measure fair value:
Level 1
Level 1 applies to assets and liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities. Valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and
regularly available in an active market and do not entail a significant degree of judgment. Our
assets utilizing Level 1 inputs include securities that are traded in an active market with
sufficient volume and frequency of transactions, such as money market funds and other highly liquid
instruments.
19
Level 2
Level 2 applies to assets and liabilities for which there are other than Level 1 observable
inputs such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for
identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions
(less active markets), or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or
can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. Our assets and
liabilities utilizing Level 2 inputs include derivative instruments.
Level 2 instruments require more management judgment and subjectivity as compared to Level 1
instruments. For instance:
|
|
|
Determining which instruments are most similar to the instrument being priced requires
management to identify a sample of similar securities based on the coupon rates, maturity,
issuer, credit rating and instrument type, and subjectively select an individual security or
multiple securities that are deemed most similar to the security being priced; and |
|
|
|
|
Determining whether a market is considered active requires management judgment. |
Level 3
Level 3 applies to assets and liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the
valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or
liabilities. The determination of fair value for Level 3 instruments requires the most management
judgment and subjectivity. Our assets utilizing Level 3 inputs include auction-rate securities.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of July 31, 2009 were
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
Description |
|
2009 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
511.6 |
|
|
$ |
511.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term available-for-sale securities |
|
|
76.0 |
|
|
|
51.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
Mexican peso currency hedge assets
(included in prepaid and other current
assets) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
610.2 |
|
|
$ |
584.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
24.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap liabilities
(included in other accrued liabilities
and other long-term liabilities) |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value |
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides detail on the activity in the auction-rate securities balance as
of July 31, 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Measurements Using |
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Balance as of October 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
40.4 |
|
Total gains or losses (realized or unrealized) |
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings (other income(loss)) |
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
2.6 |
|
Purchases, issuance, and settlements |
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and /or out of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
24.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
20
As of July 31, 2009, we held auction rate securities totaling $169.8 million at par value,
which are classified as available-for-sale securities and noncurrent assets on our condensed
consolidated balance sheets. Contractual maturities for these auction rate securities range from 12
to 43 years. With the liquidity issues experienced in the global credit and capital markets, all of
our auction-rate securities have experienced failed auctions. Due to the failed auction status and
lack of liquidity in the market for our long-term auction-rate securities, the valuation
methodology we utilized includes certain assumptions that were not supported by prices from
observable current market transactions in the same instruments nor were they based on observable
market data. With the assistance of a valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of the
auction-rate securities based on: (1) the underlying structure of each security; (2) the present
value of future principal and interest payments discounted at rates considered to reflect current
market conditions; (3) consideration of the probabilities of default, passing auction, or earning
the maximum rate for each period; and (4) estimates of the recovery rates in the event of defaults
for each security. These estimated fair values could change significantly based on future market
conditions.
Note 17: Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
As discussed in Note 1, we adopted the provisions of SFAS 161 on January 31, 2009. The
provisions require entities to provide greater transparency through additional disclosures about
(a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related
hedged items are accounted for, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect
an entitys financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Our results of operations may be materially impacted by changes in interest rates and foreign
currency exchange rates. In an effort to manage our exposure to these risks, we periodically enter
into various derivative instruments, including interest rate hedges and foreign currency hedges. We
are required to recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value
on our consolidated balance sheets and to recognize certain changes in the fair value of derivative
instruments in our consolidated statements of operations.
We perform, at least quarterly, both a prospective and retrospective assessment of the
effectiveness of our hedge contracts, including assessing the possibility of counterparty default.
If we determine that a derivative is no longer expected to be highly effective, we discontinue
hedge accounting prospectively and recognize subsequent changes in the fair value of the hedge in
earnings. As a result of our effectiveness assessment at July 31, 2009, we believe our hedge
contracts will continue to be highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flow attributable to
the hedged risks.
Cash flow hedges
Our foreign currency management objective is to mitigate the potential impact of currency
fluctuations on the value of our U.S. dollar cash flows and to reduce the variability of certain
cash flows at the subsidiary level. We actively manage certain forecasted foreign currency
exposures and use a centralized currency management operation to take advantage of potential
opportunities to naturally offset foreign currency exposures against each other. The decision of
whether and when to execute derivative instruments, along with the duration of the instrument, can
vary from period to period depending on market conditions, the relative costs of the instruments
and capacity to hedge. The duration is linked to the timing of the underlying exposure, with the
connection between the two being regularly monitored. We do not use any financial contracts for
trading purposes. At July 31, 2009, we had open Mexican peso hedge contracts with notional amounts
totaling $12.6 million and unrealized gains of $0.6 million. The peso hedge contracts consist of
forward contracts to purchase the peso at previously determined exchange rates as well as the
establishment of collars intended to limit our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations by
entering into the purchase and sale of calls and puts at specific exchange rates which settle at
the same time. These contracts, with maturities through March 2010, met the criteria for cash flow
hedges and unrealized gains and losses, after tax, are recorded as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income.
Interest rate swaps are entered into in order to manage interest rate risk associated with our
variable-rate borrowings. We entered into the following interest rate swap agreement to manage
exposures to fluctuations in interest rates by fixing the LIBOR interest rate as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Swap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
entered into |
|
Fixed Rate |
|
Notional Amount |
|
Expiration Date |
2008 |
|
4.0% |
|
$200,000,000 |
|
June 2013 |
This interest rate swap was designated as, and met the criteria of, a cash flow hedge. The
fair value of the interest rate swap agreement on July 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was a
liability of $10.3 million and $2.8 million, respectively.
21
We are exposed to foreign currency exchange risk as a result of changes in intercompany
balance sheet accounts and other balance sheet items. At July 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, these
balance sheet exposures were mitigated through the use of foreign exchange forward contracts with
maturities of approximately one month. These did not meet the criteria for hedge accounting. The
fair value of these hedges was nominal at July 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008.
The following table provides detail on the activity of our derivative instruments as of July
31, 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in SFAS 133 cash flow hedging relationships |
|
Interest rate swap(1) |
|
|
Mexican peso hedge (2) |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of October 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
(2.8 |
) |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
(2.6 |
) |
Amount of loss recognized in OCI on derivative (effective portion) |
|
|
(10.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
Amount of loss reclassified from OCI into income (effective portion) (3) |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
(10.3 |
) |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
(9.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Short-term portion included in other accrued liabilities and long-term portion included in
other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The short-term and long-term
portions for July 31, 2009 were liabilities of $5.4 million and $4.9 million, respectively.
The short-term and long-term portions for October 31, 2008 were liabilities of $2.0 million
and $0.8 million, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Assets are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and liabilities are
included in other accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. |
|
(3) |
|
Gains and losses are reclassified to interest income (expense) for the interest rate swap and
cost of goods sold for the Mexican peso hedge. |
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective
portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the hedged
transaction affects earnings. The effective portion of the derivative represents the change in fair
value of the hedge that offsets the change in fair value of the hedged item. To the extent the
change in the fair value of the hedge does not perfectly offset the change in the fair value of the
hedged item, the ineffective portion of the hedge is immediately recognized in other (expense)
income in our consolidated statements of operations.
As of July 31, 2009, we pledged $10.1 million of cash to secure the interest rate swap
termination value, which is included in our restricted cash balance. This collateral amount could
vary significantly as it fluctuates with the forward LIBOR.
We expect all of the $0.6 million unrealized gain on our Mexican peso hedge and approximately
$6.0 million of unrealized loss on our interest rate swap at July 31, 2009, to be reclassified into
the income statement within the next 12 months.
The table below provides data about the amount of gains and losses recognized in income on
derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as |
|
|
Amount of gain (loss) recognized |
|
hedging instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
|
in income on derivative |
|
|
|
Location of gain (loss) |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
recognized in income on derivative |
|
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
August 1, 2008 |
|
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
August 1, 2008 |
|
Foreign currency hedges |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
Note 18: Subsequent Event
In our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for our quarter ended May 1, 2009, we announced that, as
part of our ongoing efforts to streamline our operations and reduce costs, we had launched an
initiative expected to reduce the size of our workforce in the Europe, Middle East, Africa (EMEA)
region by 100 to 130 employees.
On August 10, 2009, we expanded this initiative to include further streamlining and
realignment of operations in locations outside the EMEA region. The expansion of the initiative
will impact employees in the United States, Latin America and the Asia Pacific region and is
intended to better align our business with the changing macro-economic and market conditions in
which we operate.
Through both the expansion of the initiative beyond the EMEA region as well as revised
estimates of the amount of charges associated with our actions in EMEA, we estimate we will incur
approximately $9 million of additional restructuring charges beyond those previously announced.
These additional estimated charges bring the total estimated restructuring charges associated with
the
22
global initiative to between $24 and $34 million. The estimated range is based on many factors,
including estimates as to the number of employees at various locations who will cease to be
employed by us and the compensation packages associated with the termination of their employment.
Depending on local laws and practices, these charges will be incurred in connection with early
retirement offers, voluntary resignations and other reductions in force.
The significant majority of the restructuring charges associated with the global initiative
represents cash paid for severance and other payments. The payments associated with these charges
will be made over varying time periods based on individual circumstances as well as local laws and
practices. We presently expect the actions associated with the expanded initiative will be
completed during fiscal 2010.
Following the expansion of the initiative, we now expect workforce reductions to impact
between 350 and 400 employees in various locations throughout our global organization.
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Overview
We are a leading global provider of broadband communications network infrastructure products
and related services. Our products offer comprehensive solutions that enable the delivery of
high-speed Internet, data, video and voice communications over wireline, wireless, cable,
enterprise and broadcast networks. These products include fiber-optic, copper and coaxial based
frames, cabinets, cables, connectors and cards, wireless capacity and coverage solutions, network
access devices and other physical infrastructure components. Our products are used primarily in
the last mile/kilometer of communications networks where Internet, data, video and voice traffic
are linked from the serving office of a communications service provider to the end-user of
communication services.
We also provide professional services to our customers. These services help our customers
plan, deploy and maintain Internet, data, video and voice communication networks. We also assist
our customers in integrating broadband communications equipment used in wireline, wireless, cable
and enterprise networks. By providing these services, we have additional opportunities to sell our
products.
Our customers consist primarily of long-distance and local communications service providers
and private enterprises that operate their own communication networks. In addition, our customers
include cable television operators, wireless service providers, new competitive telephone service
providers, broadcasters, government agencies, system integrators and communications equipment
manufacturers and distributors.
We offer broadband connectivity products, wireless capacity and coverage optimization
products, wireline access products and professional services to our customers through the following
three reportable business segments:
|
|
|
Connectivity |
|
|
|
|
Network Solutions |
|
|
|
|
Professional Services |
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, management initiated a restructuring of the Network
Solutions segment by exiting several outdoor wireless product lines. During the first quarter of
fiscal 2009, management made further changes to the Network Solutions segment by moving the
Wireline solutions business to the Connectivity segment in order to better manage and utilize
resources and drive profitability. As a result of this change, we have changed our reportable
segments to conform to our current management reporting presentation. We have reclassified prior
year segment disclosures to conform to the new segment presentation.
Our Connectivity products connect wireline, wireless, cable, enterprise and broadcast
communications networks over fiber-optic, copper (twisted pair), coaxial and wireless media. These
products provide the physical interconnections between network components and access points into
networks.
Our Network Solutions products help improve coverage and capacity for wireless networks. These
products improve signal quality, expand coverage and capacity into expanded geographic areas,
increase the speed and expand the delivery and capacity of networks,
23
and help reduce the capital and operating costs of delivering wireless services. Applications
for these products include in-building solutions, outdoor coverage solutions and mobile network
solutions.
Our Professional Services business provides integration services for broadband and
multiservice communications over wireline, wireless, cable and enterprise networks. Our
Professional Services business unit helps customers plan, deploy and maintain communications
networks that deliver Internet, data, video and voice services.
Marketplace Conditions
Current Global Macro-Economic Conditions
The widely reported global recession has had, and likely will continue to have, a significant
impact on our industry and our business. During the first three quarters of fiscal 2009 our
financial results were impacted materially and adversely by lower than expected spending by our
customers. We believe it is likely our customers will continue to spend conservatively for the
remainder of our fiscal 2009 and into our fiscal 2010 because of the uncertainties regarding the
profitability and growth of their own businesses. However, it is extremely difficult to predict
how long, and to what extent, the global recession will continue to affect our business. During
the first three quarters of fiscal 2009, the recession impacted our business specifically in a
number of ways. For instance:
|
|
|
As compared to the three and nine months ended August 1, 2008, our net sales decreased by
25.8% and 26.4%, respectively; |
|
|
|
|
As a result of significant international sales, our net sales have been negatively
impacted in recent quarters from the relative strengthening of the U.S. dollar against a
majority of other currencies. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates negatively impacted
sales in the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009 by approximately $10.0 million and
$34.0 million, respectively, versus the same periods in fiscal 2008; |
|
|
|
|
Despite reducing actual expenditures for research and development and selling and
administrative costs in the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009 compared to the same
periods in fiscal 2008, these costs grew as a percentage of our net sales because of lower
sales volumes; |
|
|
|
|
Our gross margin percentage for the nine months ended July 31, 2009 was 32.9%. This
compares to 35.5% for the same period in fiscal 2008, primarily because of lower sales
volumes; and |
|
|
|
|
We recorded a $413.9 million charge related to the impairment of goodwill and other
long-lived assets as a result of our reduced expectations of near-term financial performance
and the decline in our market capitalization. |
In response to the adverse impacts on our business caused by the recession, we have taken
significant steps to lower our operating cost structure. Over the last year, we have announced a
series of significant restructuring initiatives that are either completed or are still being
executed. These initiatives included reductions in our employee base at various locations around
the world and facility closures. These actions were designed to adjust our operations appropriately
to lower levels of demand from our customers. We also discontinued certain outdoor wireless
coverage product lines in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and completed the sale of APS Germany on
July 31, 2009. Depending on the severity and length of the recession and its impact on our
business, we may determine it appropriate to take additional actions to reduce costs and improve
our business model in the future.
Industry Conditions
Longer term, we continue to believe that the ever-increasing consumption of bandwidth will
drive a continued migration to next-generation networks that can deliver reliable broadband
services at low, often flat-rate prices over virtually any medium anytime and anywhere. We believe
this evolution particularly will impact the last mile/kilometer portion of networks where our
products and services primarily are used and where constraints in the high-speed delivery of
communications services are most likely to occur. For us to participate as fully as possible in
this evolution we must focus on the development and sale of next-generation network infrastructure
products.
We believe there are two key elements driving the migration to next-generation networks:
|
|
|
First, businesses and consumers worldwide are becoming increasingly dependent on
broadband, multi-service communications networks to conduct a wide range of daily
communications tasks for business and personal purposes (e.g., emails with large |
24
|
|
|
amounts of data, online gaming, video streaming and photo sharing). This demand for additional
broadband services increases the need for broadband network infrastructure products. |
|
|
|
|
Second, end-users of communications services increasingly expect to do business over a
single network connection at a low price. Both public networks operated by communications
service providers and private enterprise networks are evolving to provide combinations of
Internet, data, video and voice services that can be offered over the same high-speed
network connection. |
This evolution to next-generation networks impacts our industry significantly. Many of our
communications service provider customers have begun to focus their investments in these
next-generation networks to differentiate themselves from their competitors by providing more
robust services at increasing speeds. They believe such network advancements will attract business
and consumer customers and allow them to grow their businesses.
Next-generation network investment by communications service providers has tended to come in
the form of large, multi-year projects, and these significant projects have attracted many
equipment vendors, including us. We believe that it is important for us to participate in these
projects to grow our business and have therefore focused our strategy around the products that help
make these projects successful. These include central office fiber-based equipment, wireless
coverage and capacity equipment, and equipment to aid the deployment of fiber-based networks closer
to the ultimate customer (i.e., fiber to the node, curb, residence, cell site, or business, which
we collectively refer to as our FTTX products).
Communication service provider spending on these next-generation initiatives has not resulted
in significant overall spending increases on all categories of network infrastructure equipment. In
fact, spending on network infrastructure equipment in total has increased only modestly in recent
years as our customers have reallocated their spending towards new next-generation initiatives and
away from their legacy networks. Even prior to the current recession, industry observers
anticipated that in the next few years overall global spending on communications infrastructure
equipment would be relatively flat. Over the long-term, we therefore believe our ability to compete
in the communications equipment marketplace depends in significant part on whether we can continue
to develop and market effectively next-generation network infrastructure products.
Strategy
Given current economic conditions and our expectations about the marketplace, we believe we
must focus on the following three priorities for us to compete effectively in our industry over the
long-term.
First, we must grow our business in areas of strategic importance. This means increasing our
business in high growth segments within fiber-based and wireless communications networks with
central office fiber, FTTX and wireless coverage and capacity product solutions. We will also focus
on rapidly growing geographies, such as developing markets in China, Latin America, Eastern Europe,
Russia, the Middle East, Africa and India. We believe growth in these areas may come either from
our own internal initiatives to expand our product offerings through research and development
activities, additional sales and marketing resources, or from the acquisition of new products,
sales channels and businesses.
Our internal research and development efforts are focused on those areas where we believe we
are most likely to achieve success and on projects that we believe directly advance our strategic
aims. Our research and development projects have varying risk and reward profiles and we
consistently monitor these efforts to ensure that they appropriately balance the potential
opportunities against the investments required.
Several of our largest customers have engaged in consolidation to gain greater scale and
broaden their service offerings. These consolidations create companies with greater market power
which, in recent years, has placed significant pricing pressure on the products we and other
equipment vendors sell. To better serve these larger customers, we believe it is appropriate for
companies within our industry to consolidate in order to gain greater scale and position themselves
to offer a wider array of products. We also continually evaluate and monitor our existing business
and product lines for growth and profitability potential and, when we believe appropriate,
deemphasize or divest product lines and businesses that we no longer believe can advance our
strategic vision or most effectively serve our customers needs.
Second, we are focused on developing ways to sell more of our current portfolio and our newly
developed products to existing customers and to introduce our products to new customers. We
recently reorganized many of our sales and marketing activities around the types of customers we
serve (e.g., carriers, enterprise, original equipment manufacturers, etc.). This differs from a
historical
25
alignment of our sales and marketing resources that was focused more narrowly on the product
sets we sell. We believe this new market-based alignment will enable us to better understand and
serve the needs of our customers.
We also continuously seek to partner with other companies as a means to serve the public and
private communication network markets and to offer more complete solutions for our customers
needs. Many of our connectivity products in particular are conducive to incorporation by other
equipment vendors into systems level solutions. We also believe there are opportunities to sell
more of our products through indirect sales channels, including systems integrators and value added
resellers. In addition, we are expanding our relationships with distributors that make our products
more readily available to a wider base of customers worldwide.
Third, we remain highly committed to creating a compelling value proposition for our
customers. This includes helping them maximize their return on investment, evolve their networks
and simplify network deployment and maintenance challenges. We strive to offer customer-specific
solutions, price competitive products with high functionality and quality, and world-class customer
service and support that collectively will position us to grow our business in a cost-effective
manner.
We also continue to implement initiatives designed to better align our business with changing
macro-economic and market conditions that we believe will better enable us to meet the needs of our
global customer base more efficiently and effectively. These initiatives are designed to reduce
our operating cost structure and improve organizational efficiency through a variety of actions
that, among others, include:
|
|
|
migrating sales volume to customer-preferred, leading technology products and sunsetting
end of life products; |
|
|
|
|
improving our customers ordering experience through a faster, simpler, more efficient
inquiry-to-invoice process; |
|
|
|
|
redesigning product lines to gain efficiencies from the use of more common components and
improve customization capabilities; |
|
|
|
|
increasing direct material savings from strategic global sourcing; |
|
|
|
|
improving cash flow from supplier-managed inventory and lead-time reduction programs; |
|
|
|
|
relocating certain manufacturing, engineering and other operations from higher-cost
geographic areas to lower-cost areas; |
|
|
|
|
conducting LEAN activities and implementing Six Sigma methodologies; |
|
|
|
|
reducing the number of locations from which we conduct operations and general and
administrative support functions; and |
|
|
|
|
focusing our resources on core operations and, where appropriate, using third parties to
perform non-core processes. |
These initiatives have yielded significant ongoing cost savings to our operations since fiscal
2006. These savings help to generate leverage in our operating model and to offset pricing
pressures and unfavorable mixes in product sales that can have negative impacts on our operating
results. Our ability to continue to implement these initiatives is subject to numerous risks and
uncertainties and no assurance can be given that this strategy will be successful. In addition, our
gross profit percentages will continue to fluctuate from period to period due to several factors,
including, but not limited to, sales volume, raw material and freight costs, product mix and the
impact of future potential efficiency and cost saving initiatives.
A more detailed description of the risks to our business can be found in Item 1A of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2008 and in Part II, Item 1A of our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 30, 2009.
26
Results of Operations
Net Sales
The following table shows net sales and expense items from continuing operations for the three
and nine months ended July 31, 2009 and August 1, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Between Periods |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
283.4 |
|
|
$ |
381.8 |
|
|
|
(25.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
184.7 |
|
|
|
251.2 |
|
|
|
(26.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
98.7 |
|
|
|
130.6 |
|
|
|
(24.4 |
) |
Gross margin |
|
|
34.8 |
% |
|
|
34.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
(20.3 |
) |
Selling and administration |
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
83.0 |
|
|
|
(24.2 |
) |
Restructuring charges |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
85.6 |
|
|
|
104.8 |
|
|
|
(18.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
(49.2 |
) |
Operating margin |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income, net |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
512.5 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
(74.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
(63.2 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
(86.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
13.4 |
|
|
|
(58.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Between Periods |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
812.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,104.1 |
|
|
|
(26.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
545.3 |
|
|
|
711.6 |
|
|
|
(23.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
267.5 |
|
|
|
392.5 |
|
|
|
(31.8 |
) |
Gross margin |
|
|
32.9 |
% |
|
|
35.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
54.7 |
|
|
|
63.0 |
|
|
|
(13.2 |
) |
Selling and administration |
|
|
200.9 |
|
|
|
249.6 |
|
|
|
(19.5 |
) |
Restructuring charges |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
469.6 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
414.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
683.0 |
|
|
|
314.9 |
|
|
|
116.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(415.5 |
) |
|
|
77.6 |
|
|
|
(635.4 |
) |
Operating margin |
|
|
(51.1 |
)% |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income, net |
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
(465.8 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(19.3 |
) |
|
|
(74.1 |
) |
|
|
(74.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(448.7 |
) |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
(134.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(446.5 |
) |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
The following table sets forth our net sales for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009
and August 1, 2008 for each of our reportable segments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
Reportable Segment |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Between Periods |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Connectivity |
|
$ |
226.5 |
|
|
$ |
304.3 |
|
|
|
(25.6 |
)% |
Network Solutions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
(38.3 |
) |
Services |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
(45.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Network Solutions |
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
(39.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
(23.6 |
) |
Services |
|
|
28.2 |
|
|
|
33.1 |
|
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Professional Services |
|
|
37.6 |
|
|
|
45.4 |
|
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Sales |
|
$ |
283.4 |
|
|
$ |
381.8 |
|
|
|
(25.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
Reportable Segment |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Between Periods |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Connectivity |
|
$ |
643.8 |
|
|
$ |
872.2 |
|
|
|
(26.2 |
)% |
Network Solutions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
47.0 |
|
|
|
78.9 |
|
|
|
(40.4 |
) |
Services |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
(24.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Network Solutions |
|
|
59.8 |
|
|
|
95.9 |
|
|
|
(37.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
(22.6 |
) |
Services |
|
|
80.5 |
|
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
|
(18.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Professional Services |
|
|
109.2 |
|
|
|
136.0 |
|
|
|
(19.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Sales |
|
$ |
812.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,104.1 |
|
|
|
(26.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our net sales decreases for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009 compared to the
three and nine months ended August 1, 2008 were driven by significant sales declines in all
reporting segments. These decreases are due to the general downturn of the global economy, which
extended across a majority of our geographies in the first three quarters of fiscal 2009.
Geographically, there was particular weakness in the Europe, Middle East, Africa (EMEA) region and
Latin America, and relative strength in China.
International sales comprised 39.1% and 40.5% of our net sales for the three and nine months
ended July 31, 2009, respectively. This compares to 44.1% and 41.6% for the three and nine months
ended August 1, 2008, respectively. As a result of significant international sales, our net sales
have been negatively impacted in recent quarters from the relative strengthening of the U.S. dollar
against a majority of other currencies. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates negatively
impacted sales in the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009 by approximately $10.0 million and
$34.0 million, respectively, versus the same periods in fiscal 2008.
The three and nine months ended July 31, 2009 included sales in Connectivity of $17.4 million
and $55.6 million, respectively, as a result of the Century Man acquisition that closed during
January 2008. This compares to $10.3 million and $19.9 million for the three and nine months ended
August 1, 2008, respectively. This increase was due to the inclusion of Century Man in our results
for the full first quarter of fiscal 2009 and increased demand largely as a result of the Chinese
government economic stimulus package and the issuance of 3G wireless licenses in China.
The decrease in Network Solutions sales was driven, in part, by our decision to shutdown
certain outdoor wireless product lines in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 as well as by
significant declines in sales outside of North America that we believe are the result of the global
recession.
Relative to our other reporting segments, Professional Services experienced a less significant
decline in sales due to continued spending by a primary customer.
28
Gross Margin
During the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009, our gross margin percentages were 34.8%
and 32.9%, respectively, compared to 34.2% and 35.5%, respectively, for the comparable 2008
periods.
The increase in our gross margin percentages for the three month period ended July 31, 2009
was driven primarily by our continued cost reduction initiatives, partially offset by lower sales
volumes as compared to last year. Our cost reduction initiatives have included headcount
reductions to align our production-related activities with current levels of demand, closure of
certain manufacturing locations, and efficiencies generated in our manufacturing operations and
supply chain.
The decrease in gross margins for the nine month period ended July 31, 2009 was driven
primarily by a decrease in sales volumes due to the global recession, partially offset by our cost
reduction initiatives.
If sales volumes, product mix, pricing or other significant factors that impact our gross
margins continue to be affected by the economic downturn, our gross margins could continue to be
adversely affected. As a result of these and other factors, our future gross margin rate is
difficult to predict and could fluctuate significantly.
Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009 represented 30.2%
and 84.0% of net sales, respectively. Our fiscal 2009 year-to-date results include a $413.9 million
impairment of goodwill and intangible assets. Total operating expenses represented 27.4% and 28.5%
of net sales for the same fiscal 2008 periods, respectively. As discussed below, operating expenses
include research and development, selling and administration expenses and restructuring and
impairment charges.
Research and development: Research and development expenses for the three and nine months
ended July 31, 2009 represented 6.1% and 6.7% of net sales, respectively. For the three and nine
months ended August 1, 2008, these expenses represented 5.7% of net sales. This increase as a
percent of sales is due to lower sales volumes. Research and development expenses decreased to
$17.3 million and $54.7 million for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009, respectively,
compared to $21.7 million and $63.0 million for the same fiscal 2008 periods. This decrease was a
result of our cost reduction initiatives. Given the rapidly changing technological and competitive
environment in the communications equipment industry, continued commitment to product development
efforts will be required for us to remain competitive. Accordingly, we intend to continue to
allocate substantial resources, as a percentage of our net sales, to product development. Most of
our research will be directed towards projects that we believe directly advance our strategic aims
in segments in the marketplace that we believe are most likely to grow.
Selling and administration: Selling and administration expenses for the three and nine months
ended July 31, 2009 represented 22.2% and 24.7% of net sales, respectively. For the three and nine
months ended August 1, 2008, these expenses represented 21.7% and 22.6% of net sales, respectively.
This increase as a percent of sales is due to lower sales volumes. Selling and administration
expenses decreased to $62.9 million and $200.9 million for the three and nine months ended July 31,
2009, respectively, compared to $83.0 million and $249.6 million for the same fiscal 2008 periods.
These decreases were primarily due to our cost reduction initiatives, which included headcount
reductions and significant decreases in discretionary spending, and a decrease in incentives and
acquisition amortization.
Restructuring charges: Restructuring charges include employee severance, other
compensation-related payments, and facility consolidation costs resulting from the closure of
leased facilities and other workforce reductions attributable to our efforts to reduce costs. In
June and August of this year we made separate announcements regarding restructuring charges we
expect to incur from ongoing cost reduction initiatives, primarily because of reductions in force
and voluntary retirement programs throughout the world. In total we presently expect these
initiatives to reduce our global workforce by 350 to 400 employees and generate between $24 and 34
million in restructuring charges over the remainder of fiscal year 2009 and all of fiscal year
2010.
During the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009, 28 and 464 employees, respectively,
affecting all business segments were impacted by reductions in force or participated in early
retirement programs. The majority of these employee reductions in fiscal third quarter are
included in the estimated number of employees whose employment will be terminated from our recently
announced cost reduction initiatives disclosed in June and August of this year, while the remaining
reductions were primarily associated with previous restructuring initiatives. During the three and
nine months ended August 1, 2008, 4 and 21 employees, respectively, in our Connectivity and Network
Solutions segments were impacted by reductions in force. The costs of these reductions have been
and will
29
be funded through cash from operations. We had additional reductions in force impacting 303
employees during the second quarter of fiscal 2009, for which we did not incur restructuring
charges.
Facility consolidation and lease termination expenses represent costs associated with our
decision to consolidate and close duplicative or excess manufacturing and office facilities. During
the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009, we incurred charges of $0.3 million and $0.6
million, respectively. These charges were incurred due to our decision to close unproductive and
excess facilities as well as to the continued softening of real estate markets, which resulted in
estimates of lower sublease income. During the three months ended August 1, 2008, we recorded a
credit of $0.2 million.
Impairments: We review goodwill annually for impairment, or more frequently if potential
interim indicators exist that could result in impairment. The current global recession and related
adverse business conditions have resulted in reduced estimates to our near-term cash flow and a
sustained decline in our market capitalization. Due to these factors, during the first quarter of
fiscal 2009, we performed a goodwill impairment analysis of our two reporting units that contain
goodwill, Connectivity and Network Solutions. The analysis resulted in the recognition of
impairment charges for both reporting units. In our analysis, the fair values of each of the
reporting units were estimated for the purpose of goodwill impairment testing by applying the
present value of forecasted future cash flows, using estimates, judgments and assumptions that
management believed were appropriate for the circumstances. We also considered market approaches as
well as the cost approach in estimating fair value. In performing the goodwill impairment analysis,
we, among other things, consulted with an independent advisor.
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that their
carrying amount may not be recoverable. Based on recent business conditions, an impairment review
of long-lived assets was performed in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The review resulted in the
recognition of an impairment charge related to the intangible assets of the Network Solutions
segment. The fair value of the impaired assets was estimated by applying the present value of
forecasted future cash flows, using estimates, judgments and assumptions that management believed
were appropriate for the circumstances. In preparing the estimated fair value of the impaired
assets, we, among other things, consulted with an independent advisor.
As of our first quarter of fiscal 2009, we recorded an estimated impairment charge of $413.5
million to reduce the carrying value of goodwill and other long-lived intangibles. The estimated
impairment includes $280.8 million of goodwill related to Connectivity and $85.4 million of
goodwill and $47.3 million of intangibles related to Network Solutions. We finalized this analysis
in connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the second quarter of fiscal
2009. We recognized an additional goodwill impairment charge of $0.4 million related to
Connectivity in the three months ended May 1, 2009. We believe that our reduced estimates of
financial performance do not materially impact our liquidity position or our ability to execute our
business strategy.
Other Income (Loss), Net
Other income (loss), net is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
August 1, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Interest income on investments |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
|
$ |
25.1 |
|
Interest expense on borrowings |
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
(21.3 |
) |
|
|
(21.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (loss), net |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
3.8 |
|
Write-down of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
(74.2 |
) |
Write-down of cost method investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
Gain (loss) on sale of fixed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
(19.3 |
) |
|
|
(74.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (loss), net |
|
$ |
(7.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(9.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(33.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(70.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three and nine months ended July 31, 2009, we recorded impairment charges of $3.2
million and $18.1 million, respectively, on certain auction-rate
securities we hold. During the three and nine months ended August 1, 2008, these charges were $6.0
million and $74.2 million, respectively. As of July 31, 2009, we held auction-rate securities with
a fair value of $24.9 million and an original par value of $169.8 million. Given the current state
of the credit markets, when we prepare our quarterly financial results we will continue to assess
the fair value of our auction-rate securities for substantive changes in relevant
30
market conditions, changes in financial condition or other changes in these investments. We
may be required to record additional losses for impairment if we determine there are further
declines in fair value that are other-than-temporary.
During the first quarter of 2009, we recorded a $3.0 million impairment to write-off our
investment in E-Band Communications Corporation.
The $0.9 million gain on the sale of fixed assets recorded during the nine months ended July
31, 2009 is primarily due to a $1.1 million gain recognized on the sale of our Cheltenham facility
located in the U.K.
The change in net interest income (loss) was predominately due to significantly lower interest
income rates on cash investments.
Income Taxes
Our tax expense of $0.4 million for the three months ended July 31, 2009 primarily relates to
foreign income taxes, and our income tax benefit of $2.2 million for the nine months ended July 31,
2009 primarily relates to reversal of deferred tax liabilities attributable to U.S. tax
amortization of purchased goodwill from the acquisition of KRONE, partially offset by foreign
income taxes. The reversal of these deferred tax liabilities resulted from the goodwill impairment
charge discussed in Note 8 of the financial statements. Substantially all our income tax provision
for the three and nine months ended August 1, 2008 relates to foreign income taxes and deferred tax
liabilities attributable to U.S. tax amortization of purchased goodwill from the acquisition of
KRONE.
The following table represents our effective income tax rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
August 1, 2008 |
|
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
August 1, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except tax rates) |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
(2.2 |
) |
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
16.3 |
|
|
$ |
(448.7 |
) |
|
$ |
7.3 |
|
Effective income tax rate |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
86.3 |
|
Our effective income tax rate is impacted by items discrete to the reporting period such as
impairment charges on available-for-sale-securities and goodwill. No tax benefit was recorded for
the impairment charges because the deferred tax asset created by the impairment charges has been
offset by a full valuation allowance. The impact of these impairment charges on our effective tax
rate is discrete to the period in which the impairment charge was recorded and will not impact our
effective tax rate in future periods. In addition, our effective income tax rate is affected by
changes in the valuation allowance recorded for our deferred tax assets. See Note 8 to the
financial statements for a description of the accounting standards related to our recording of the
valuation allowance.
We do not record income tax benefits in most jurisdictions where we incur pretax losses
because the deferred tax assets generated by the losses have been offset with a corresponding
increase in the valuation allowance. Likewise, we do not record income tax expense in most
jurisdictions where we have pretax income because the deferred tax assets utilized to reduce income
taxes payable have been offset with a corresponding reduction in the valuation allowance.
Acquisitions
ANIHA
During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, we acquired the outstanding ownership interest in our
ANIHA organization in China from Nitta Corporation, a Japanese corporation, for a cash price of
$0.8 million. In addition to the cash purchase price we agreed to restructure $1.9 million of
previously recorded obligations between us and Nitta Corporation into a single interest bearing
(1.5% per year) note payable, requiring us to pay quarterly principal and interest payments to
Nitta Corporation beginning July 2009 through February 2016. In addition, we agreed to enter into
a contract to purchase from Nitta Corporation a predetermined percentage of our annual requirements
of certain components over the next three years. As a result of this step acquisition the minority
interest previously recorded has been removed from our consolidated balance sheet in the amount of
$2.3 million.
LGC
On December 3, 2007, we completed the acquisition of LGC, a provider of in-building wireless
solution products, headquartered in San Jose, California. These products increase the quality and
capacity of wireless networks by permitting voice and data signals to
31
penetrate building structures and by distributing these signals evenly throughout the
building. LGC also offers products that permit voice and data signals to reach remote locations.
The acquisition was made to enable us to participate in this high growth segment of the industry.
We acquired all of the outstanding capital stock and warrants of LGC for $143.3 million in
cash (net of cash acquired). We acquired $58.9 million of intangible assets as part of this
purchase. Goodwill of $85.4 million was recorded in this transaction and assigned to our Network
Solutions segment. This goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes. We also assumed debt of $17.3
million associated with this acquisition, the majority of which was paid off by the second quarter
of fiscal 2008. The results of LGC, subsequent to December 3, 2007, are included in our
consolidated statements of operations.
Option holders of LGC shares were given the opportunity either to receive a cash payment for
their options or exchange their options for options to acquire ADC shares. Certain LGC option
holders received $9.1 million in cash payments for their options. The remaining option holders
received ADC options with a fair value of $3.5 million as of the close of the acquisition. Of this
$3.5 million, $3.0 million was added to the purchase price of LGC and the remaining $0.5 million
will be recognized over the remaining vesting period that ends in September 2011.
Of the purchase price, $15.5 million was placed in escrow for up to 15 months following the
close of the transaction. As of May 1, 2009, $2.7 million of the total escrow amount had been
released to us to settle certain indemnity claims under the purchase agreement. The $2.7 million
payment was accounted for as a return of consideration and decreased goodwill accordingly. We have
also since reached an agreement with LGC to release to us an additional $1.2 million of escrow for
the final settlement of certain indemnity claims. Since the recovery of the $1.2 million was not
considered probable, we did not record a receivable related to this amount in purchase accounting.
Therefore, the entire $1.2 million was recognized as a reduction to operating expense during the
third quarter of fiscal 2009 when it was received. As a result of this settlement, the remaining
funds held in the escrow were released to the former LGC shareholders and the escrow agreement was
terminated.
Century Man
On January 10, 2008, we completed the acquisition of Century Man, a leading provider of
communication distribution frame solutions, headquartered in Shenzhen, China. The acquisition was
made to accelerate our growth in the Chinese connectivity market, as well as provide us with
additional products designed to meet the needs of customers in developing markets outside of China.
We acquired Century Man for $52.3 million in cash (net of cash acquired). The former
shareholders of Century Man may be paid up to an additional $15.0 million (the earn out) if,
during the three years following closing, certain financial results are achieved by the acquired
business. We paid the first $5.0 million installment of this earn out in March 2009. In addition, a
$0.4 million payment was made to the former shareholders for the effect of changes in foreign
exchange rates on the installment payment. These amounts were recorded as increases to the goodwill
associated with these transactions.
Of the purchase price, $7.5 million was placed in escrow for up to 24 months following the
close of the transaction. Of the $7.5 million, $7.0 million relates to potential indemnification
claims and $0.5 million relates to the disposition of certain properties. As of July 31, 2009, $3.5
million of the total escrow amount had been released to the former shareholders of Century Man. In
addition, a $0.3 million payment was made to the former shareholders for the effect of changes in
foreign exchange rates on the amount of escrow released in accordance with the escrow agreement.
This payment was accounted for as additional contingent consideration and increased goodwill
accordingly.
We acquired $13.0 million of intangible assets as part of this purchase. Goodwill of $36.7
million was recorded in this transaction and assigned to our Connectivity segment. This goodwill is
not deductible for tax purposes. The results of Century Man, subsequent to January 10, 2008, are
included in our consolidated statements of operations.
The allocation of the purchase prices for LGC and Century Man to the assets and liabilities
acquired was finalized in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and did not result in any material
adjustments. See Note 8 for a discussion of the goodwill and intangible asset impairments recorded
in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
32
Discontinued Operations
APS Germany
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, our Board of Directors approved a plan to divest APS
Germany. We classified this business as a discontinued operation in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2008. This business was previously included in our Professional Services segment. On July 31, 2009,
we sold all of the capital stock of our subsidiary that operated our APS Germany business to telent
Investments Limited for a cash purchase price of $3.3 million, subject to a customary working
capital adjustment. During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, we recognized a loss on this sale in
the amount of $4.6 million.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
See our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2008 and our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 30, 2009 for a discussion of our critical accounting
policies and estimates.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
Cash and cash equivalents not subject to restrictions were $511.6 million at July 31, 2009, a
decrease of $119.8 million compared to $631.4 million as of October 31, 2008. This decrease was
primarily driven by $94.1 million of stock repurchases, $51.4 million of long-term investment
purchases and the payment of management and employee incentives related to performance for fiscal
2008, partially offset by cash generated from operations.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we purchased $51.4 million, including accrued
interest, of unsecured notes backed by a guarantee from the FDIC. This investment is classified on
the balance sheet as long-term available-for-sale securities.
Current capital market conditions have significantly reduced our ability to liquidate our remaining auction-rate securities. As of July 31, 2009, we held auction-rate securities with a fair value of $24.9 million and an original par value of $169.8 million, which are classified as long-term. We may not be able to liquidate any of these auction-rate securities until either a future auction is successful or, in the event secondary market sales become available, we decide to sell the securities in a secondary market. A secondary market sale of any of these securities could take a significant amount of time to complete and could potentially result in a further loss.
We have commenced arbitration against Merrill Lynch and its agent/broker who worked on our
account in connection with their sale of auction-rate securities to us. The par value of the
auction-rate securities at issue in our claim is approximately $138.0 million. We presently expect
our arbitration hearing to take place during June 2010. Lehman Brothers sold us all other
auction-rate-securities that we hold. We have made a claim in the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy
proceeding with respect to these securities, however, we are uncertain whether we will recover any
of our losses associated with these securities at this time.
Restricted cash balances that are pledged primarily as collateral for letters of credit and
derivative transactions affect our liquidity. As of July 31, 2009, we had restricted cash of $21.8
million compared to $15.3 million as of October 31, 2008, an increase of $6.5 million. Restricted
cash is expected to become available to us upon satisfaction of the obligations pursuant to which
the letters of credit or guarantees were issued. The increase is a result of the pledging of $10.1
million of cash collateral relating to the interest rate swap. This amount pledged could vary
significantly as it fluctuates with forward LIBOR.
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations for the nine months ended
July 31, 2009 was $58.7 million. This positive cash flow was primarily driven by results from
continuing operations after adjustments for certain non-cash items, including the $413.9 million
goodwill and intangible impairment recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2009, partially offset
by cash used for working capital. Working capital requirements typically will increase or decrease
with changes in the level of net sales. In addition, the timing of certain accrued incentive
payments will affect the annual cash flow as these expenses are accrued throughout the fiscal year
but paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year.
33
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations for the nine months ended
August 1, 2008 was $110.0 million. This positive cash flow was driven by results from continuing
operations partially offset by a $43.7 million decrease in net working capital.
Investing Activities
Cash used by investing activities from continuing operations was $79.2 million for the nine
months ended July 31, 2009, which was due to $51.4 million of purchases of long-term investments,
$25.6 million of property, patent and equipment additions and an increase in restricted cash of
$6.1 million, partially offset by $4.7 million of proceeds from the disposal of property and
equipment. Proceeds from the disposal of property primarily reflect the sale of our Cheltenham U.K.
facility, for which we received $4.3 million of cash proceeds during the first quarter of fiscal
2009.
Cash used by investing activities from continuing operations was $201.2 million for the nine
months ended August 1, 2008, which was due to $146.0 million for the acquisition of LGC, $53.4
million for the acquisition of Century Man, a $4.0 million investment in ip.access, Ltd., a $1.2
million investment in E-Band Communications Corporation and $30.7 million of property, equipment
and patent additions. This was partially offset by $39.7 million of net sales of available-for-sale
securities.
Financing Activities
Cash used by financing activities from continuing operations was $96.7 million for the nine
months ended July 31, 2009, of which $94.1 million was due to common stock repurchases.
Cash provided by financing activities was $220.8 million for the nine months ended August 1,
2008. This was due to the issuance of $450.0 million of convertible debt, less payments for the
financing costs associated with the issuance of this debt and $218.9 million of debt payments.
Credit Facility
On January 30, 2009, we terminated the $200.0 million secured five-year revolving credit
facility that we entered into in April 2008. This facility had no outstanding balances when it was
terminated. As a result of the current economic environment and its impact on our financial
results, we believed that the provisions of the agreement would need to be amended in order to
maintain and utilize this facility. Based on our discussions with the lenders, we determined that
the terms of an amendment as well as the ongoing cost of maintaining the facility were not
economical. As a consequence of terminating our revolving credit facility, we recorded a
non-operating charge of $1.0 million to write-off the deferred financing costs associated with the
facility in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
The assets that secured the facility also served as collateral for our interest rate swap on
our $200.0 million convertible unsecured floating rate notes that mature in 2013. As a result of
the facilitys termination, we were required to pledge cash collateral to secure the interest rate
swap. The fair market value of the interest rate swap was a net unrealized loss of $10.3 million
and $2.8 million on July 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, respectively. The unrealized loss is
recorded as a component of comprehensive income.
Share Repurchase
On August 12, 2008, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program for up to
$150.0 million. The program provided that share repurchases could commence beginning in September
2008 and continue until the earlier of the completion of $150.0 million in share repurchases or
July 31, 2009. In early December 2008, we completed this $150.0 million repurchase program at an
average price of $7.04 per share, resulting in 21.3 million shares being purchased under the
program.
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
We do not have any off-balance-sheet arrangements. There has been no material change in our
contractual obligations out of the ordinary course of our business since the end of fiscal 2008.
See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008, for additional
information regarding our contractual obligations.
Working Capital and Liquidity Outlook
Our main source of liquidity continues to be our unrestricted cash resources, which include
existing cash and cash equivalents and other liquid investments. We currently expect that our
existing cash resources will be sufficient to meet our anticipated needs for working capital and
capital expenditures to execute our near-term business plan. This expectation is based on current
business
34
operations and economic conditions and assumes we are able to maintain breakeven or positive
cash flows from operations on an annual basis.
Auction-rate securities accounted for $24.9 million of our $76.0 million in available-for-sale
securities as of July 31, 2009. Current capital market conditions have significantly reduced our
ability to liquidate our auction-rate securities. However, we do not believe we need these
investments in order to meet the cash needs of our present operating plans. The remaining $51.1
million of our available-for-sale securities represents highly liquid notes backed by a guarantee
from the FDIC.
We also believe that our unrestricted cash resources will enable us to pursue strategic
opportunities, including possible product line or business acquisitions. However, if the cost of
one or more acquisition opportunities exceeds our existing cash resources, additional sources may
be required. Any plan to raise additional capital may involve an equity-based or equity-linked
financing, such as another issuance of convertible debt or the issuance of common stock or
preferred stock, which would be dilutive to existing shareowners. As a result of terminating the
$200.0 million revolving bank credit facility, our assets that previously secured the facility are
no longer encumbered. Such assets could be used to raise liquidity through asset sales,
securitizations, or a new lending facility. If we raise additional funds by issuing debt, we may be
subject to restrictive covenants that could limit our operational flexibility and to higher
interest expense that could dilute earnings per share.
In addition, our deferred tax assets, which are substantially reserved at this time, should
reduce our income tax payable on taxable earnings in future years.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Information
The discussion herein, including, but not limited to, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations as well as the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements, contains various forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Forward-looking statements represent our expectations or
beliefs concerning future events and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could
cause actual results to differ materially from the forward looking statements. These statements may
include, among others, statements regarding future sales, profit percentages, earnings per share
and other results of operations; statements about shareholder value; expectations or beliefs
regarding the marketplace in which we operate and the macro-economy generally; statements about our
cost cutting initiatives; the prices of raw materials and transportation costs; the sufficiency of
our cash balances and cash generated from operating and financing activities for our future
liquidity; capital resource needs, and the effect of regulatory changes. These statements could be
affected by a variety of factors, such as: demand for equipment by telecommunication service
providers and large enterprises; variations in demand for particular products in our portfolio and
other factors that can impact our overall margins; our ability to operate our business to achieve,
maintain and grow operating profitability; changing regulatory conditions and macroeconomic
conditions both in our industry and in local and global markets that can influence the demand for
our products and services; fluctuations in the market value of our common stock, which can be
caused by many factors outside of our control and could cause us to record additional impairment
charges on our goodwill or other intangible assets in the future if our market capitalization drops
below the book value of our assets for a continued time period; consolidation among our customers,
competitors or vendors that can disrupt or displace customer relationships; our ability to keep
pace with rapid technological change in our industry; our ability to make the proper strategic
choices regarding acquisitions or divestitures; our ability to integrate the operations of any
acquired business; increased competition within our industry and increased pricing pressure from
our customers; our dependence on relatively few customers for a majority of our sales as well as
potential sales growth in market segments we believe have the greatest potential; fluctuations in
our operating results from quarter-to-quarter that can be caused by many factors beyond our
control; financial problems, work interruptions in operations or other difficulties faced by
customers or vendors that can impact our sales, sales collections and ability to procure necessary
materials, components and services to operate our business; our ability to protect our intellectual
property rights and defend against potential infringement claims; possible limitations on our
ability to raise any additional required capital; declines in the fair value and liquidity of
auction-rate securities we hold; our ability to attract and retain qualified employees; potential
liabilities that can arise if any of our products have design or manufacturing defects; our ability
to obtain and the prices of raw materials, components and services; our dependence on contract
manufacturers to make certain products; changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates
and equity securities prices, all of which will impact our operating results; political, economic
and legal uncertainties related to doing business in China; our ability to defend or settle
satisfactorily any litigation; and other risks and uncertainties including those identified in the
sections captioned Risk Factors in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
October 31, 2008 and Part II, Item 1A of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
January 30, 2009. We disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
35
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
As disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2008, our major
market risk exposure relates to adverse fluctuations in certain commodity prices, security prices
and foreign currency exchange rates. We believe our exposure associated with these market risks has
not changed materially since October 31, 2008.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the
Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, there was no change in our internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
36
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
We are a party to various lawsuits, proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of
business or otherwise. Many of these disputes may be resolved without formal litigation. The amount
of monetary liability resulting from the ultimate resolution of these matters cannot be determined
at this time. As of July 31, 2009, we had recorded $6.3 million in loss reserves for certain of
these matters. In light of the reserves we have recorded, at this time we believe the ultimate
resolution of these lawsuits, proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse impact on our
business, results of operations or financial condition. Because of the uncertainty inherent in
litigation, however, it is possible that unfavorable resolutions of one or more of these lawsuits,
proceedings and claims could exceed the amount currently reserved and could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
On August 17, 2009, we met with representatives from the Office of the Inspector General of
the United States where we disclosed a potential breach of the country of origin requirements for
certain products sold under a supply agreement with the federal governments General Services
Administration.. We self-reported this potential breach as a precautionary matter and it is
unclear at this time whether any penalties will be imposed. Following the meeting, we provided
the Office of the Inspector General with additional documentation related to this matter. We
expect a further response from the Office of Inspector General following its review of this
information.
The discussion of our business and operations should be read together with the risk factors
contained in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008
and in Part II, Item 1A of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 30, 2009
filed with the SEC, which describe various risks and uncertainties to which we are or may become
subject. These risks and uncertainties have the potential to affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations, cash flows, strategies or prospects in a material and adverse
manner.
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
None.
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
None.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
None.
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
See Exhibit Index on page 39 for a description of the documents that are filed as exhibits to
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or incorporated by reference herein. Any document incorporated
by reference is identified by a parenthetical referencing the SEC filing which included the
document.
37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: September 2, 2009 |
ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ James G. Mathews
|
|
|
|
James G. Mathews |
|
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
38
ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
EXHIBIT INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
3.1 |
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation of ADC Telecommunications, Inc., conformed to
incorporate amendments dated January 20, 2000, June 30, 2000, August 13, 2001, March
2, 2004 and May 9, 2005. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3-a to ADCs
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 29, 2005.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Restated Bylaws of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. effective December 9, 2008.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of ADCs Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on December 12, 2008.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Form of certificate for shares of Common Stock of ADC Telecommunications, Inc.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4-a to ADCs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended April 29, 2005.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Rights Agreement, as amended and restated as of May 9, 2007, between ADC
Telecommunications, Inc. and Computershare Investor Services, LLC, as Rights Agent
(which includes as Exhibit A, the Form of Certificate of Designation, Preferences
and Right of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, as Exhibit B, the Form
of Right Certificate, and as Exhibit C, the Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred
Shares). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4-b to ADCs Form 8-A/A filed on May
11, 2007.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement between ADC Telecommunications, Inc. and
Robert E. Switz dated July 1, 2009. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of
ADCs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2009.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of principal executive officer required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of principal financial officer required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Certifications furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
39