defm14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
þ |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ |
|
No fee required. |
|
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for
which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the
Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
(1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSED
MERGER YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT
The boards of directors of Denbury Resources Inc., or Denbury,
and Encore Acquisition Company, or Encore, have approved an
agreement and plan of merger, or the merger agreement, pursuant
to which Encore will merge with and into Denbury. We are sending
this joint proxy statement/prospectus to you to ask you to vote
in favor of a proposal to adopt the merger agreement and other
matters.
Under the merger agreement, Encore stockholders may elect to
receive consideration consisting of cash, shares of Denbury
common stock or a combination of both in exchange for their
shares of Encore common stock, subject to a proration feature.
Encore stockholders electing to receive a mix of cash and stock
consideration and non-electing stockholders will receive $15.00
in cash and between 2.0698 and 2.6336 shares of Denbury
common stock in exchange for each Encore share. Subject to
proration, Encore stockholders electing to receive all cash will
receive $50.00 per Encore share and Encore stockholders electing
to receive only Denbury common stock will receive between 2.9568
and 3.7622 shares of Denbury common stock in exchange for
each Encore share. The actual number of shares of Denbury common
stock to be issued to Encore stockholders receiving either all
stock or a mix of cash and stock consideration will be
determined under a collar mechanism based upon the volume
weighted average price of Denbury common stock for the
20-day
trading period ending on the second full trading day prior to
the effective time of the merger, as more fully described in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Denbury stockholders will continue to own their existing Denbury
shares following the merger. We anticipate that, after the
merger closes, Denbury stockholders will own between 64% and 70%
of the combined company and Encore stockholders will own between
30% and 36% of the combined company.
Denburys common stock is listed on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol DNR.
Encores common stock is listed on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol EAC.
In connection with the merger, each of Denbury and Encore is
holding a special meeting of its stockholders to consider and
vote on the merger agreement and certain other matters.
Your vote is very important. At Denburys special meeting,
Denbury stockholders will be asked to adopt the merger
agreement. At Encores special meeting, Encore stockholders
will be asked to adopt the merger agreement. The merger
agreement provides for, among other things, the merger of Encore
with and into Denbury and the issuance of Denbury common stock
to Encore stockholders as part of the merger consideration.
This document is a prospectus relating to the shares of Denbury
common stock to be issued pursuant to the merger and a joint
proxy statement for Denbury and Encore to solicit proxies for
their respective special meetings of stockholders. It contains
answers to frequently asked questions and a summary of the
important terms of the merger, the merger agreement and related
matters, followed by a more detailed discussion.
For a discussion of certain significant matters that you
should consider before voting on the proposed transaction, see
Risk Factors beginning on page 34.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of the Denbury
common stock to be issued pursuant to the merger or passed upon
the adequacy or accuracy of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a
criminal offense.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated February 5,
2010 and is first being mailed to stockholders of Denbury and
Encore on or about February 10, 2010.
Denbury Resources
Inc.
5100 Tennyson Parkway, Suite 1200
Plano, Texas 75024
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS OF
DENBURY RESOURCES
INC.
TO BE HELD ON MARCH 9,
2010
To the Stockholders of Denbury Resources Inc.:
We will hold a special meeting of the stockholders of Denbury
Resources Inc. on March 9, 2010 at 10:00 a.m., local time,
at 5100 Tennyson Parkway, Plano, Texas 75024 for the
following purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the Agreement and
Plan of Merger, dated as of October 31, 2009, by and
between Denbury and Encore, which provides for, among other
things, the merger of Encore with and into Denbury and the
issuance of Denbury common stock to Encore stockholders as part
of the merger consideration;
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote upon a proposal to adjourn the special
meeting, if necessary or appropriate to permit the solicitation
of additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the
time of the special meeting to adopt the foregoing
proposal; and
|
|
|
|
to transact any other business that may properly come before the
special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the
special meeting.
|
Only holders of record of Denbury common stock at the close of
business on February 3, 2010, the record date for the
special meeting, are entitled to receive this notice and to vote
their shares at the special meeting or at any adjournment or
postponement of the special meeting.
We cannot complete the merger unless holders of a majority of
all outstanding shares of Denbury common stock vote to adopt the
merger agreement, which provides for, among other things, the
merger of Encore with and into Denbury and the issuance of
Denbury common stock to Encore stockholders as part of the
merger consideration.
For more information about the merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement (including the issuance of
shares of Denbury common stock), please review the accompanying
joint proxy
statement/prospectus
and the merger agreement attached to it as Annex A.
Denburys board of directors recommends unanimously that
Denbury stockholders vote FOR the adoption of the
merger agreement, which provides for, among other things, the
merger of Encore with and into Denbury and the issuance of
Denbury common stock to Encore stockholders as part of the
merger consideration, and FOR the adjournment of the
Denbury special meeting, if necessary or appropriate to permit
further solicitation of proxies.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Phil Rykhoek
Chief Executive Officer
Plano, Texas
February 5, 2010
IMPORTANT
Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the
special meeting, please complete, sign and date the enclosed
proxy and return it promptly in the enclosed postage-paid
envelope. You may also cast your vote by telephone or over the
Internet by following the instructions on your proxy card. If
you vote by telephone or over the Internet, you do not need to
submit your proxy card. Remember, your vote is important, so
please act today!
Encore Acquisition
Company
777 Main Street, Suite 1400
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS OF
ENCORE ACQUISITION
COMPANY
TO BE HELD ON MARCH 9,
2010
To the Stockholders of Encore Acquisition Company:
We will hold a special meeting of the stockholders of Encore
Acquisition Company on March 9, 2010 at 10:00 a.m.,
local time, at 777 Main Street, Suite 900, Fort Worth,
Texas 76102 for the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the Agreement and
Plan of Merger, dated as of October 31, 2009, by and
between Encore and Denbury pursuant to which Encore will merge
with and into Denbury;
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote upon a proposal to adjourn the special
meeting, if necessary or appropriate to permit the solicitation
of additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the
time of the special meeting to adopt the foregoing
proposal; and
|
|
|
|
to transact any other business that may properly come before the
special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the
special meeting.
|
Only holders of record of Encore common stock at the close of
business on February 3, 2010, the record date for the
special meeting, are entitled to receive this notice and to vote
their shares at the special meeting or at any adjournment or
postponement of the special meeting.
We cannot complete the merger unless holders of a majority of
all outstanding shares of Encore common stock vote to adopt the
merger agreement.
For more information about the merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, please review the
accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus and the merger
agreement attached to it as Annex A.
Encores board of directors recommends unanimously that
Encore stockholders vote FOR the adoption of the
merger agreement and FOR the adjournment of the
Encore special meeting, if necessary or appropriate to permit
further solicitation of proxies. In considering the
recommendation of Encores board of directors, stockholders
of Encore should be aware that members of Encores board of
directors and its executive officers have agreements and
arrangements that provide them with interests in the merger that
may be different from, or in addition to, those of Encore
stockholders. See The Merger Interests of
Certain Persons in the Merger that May be Different from Your
Interests beginning on page 81.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
I. Jon Brumley
Chairman
Fort Worth, Texas
February 5, 2010
IMPORTANT
Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the
special meeting, please complete, sign and date the enclosed
proxy and return it promptly in the enclosed postage-paid
envelope. You may also cast your vote by telephone or over the
Internet by following the instructions on your proxy card. If
you vote by telephone or over the Internet, you do not need to
submit your proxy card. Please do not send any stock
certificates at this time. Remember, your vote is important, so
please act today!
REFERENCES
TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This joint proxy statement/prospectus incorporates important
business and financial information about Denbury and Encore from
documents that are not included in or delivered with this joint
proxy
statement/prospectus.
You can review documents incorporated by reference in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus free of charge through the Securities
and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, website
(http://www.sec.gov) or by requesting them in writing or by
telephone from the applicable company at the following addresses
and telephone numbers:
|
|
|
Denbury Resources Inc.
5100 Tennyson Pkwy., Suite 1200
Plano, Texas 75024
Attention: Investor Relations
Telephone:
(972) 673-2000
|
|
Encore Acquisition Company
777 Main Street, Suite 1400
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
Attention: Investor Relations
Telephone: (817) 877-9955
|
You will not be charged for any of these documents that you
request. Denbury and Encore stockholders requesting documents
should do so by February 25, 2010, in order to receive them
before their respective special meetings.
See Where You Can Find More Information on
page 117.
VOTING BY
TELEPHONE, INTERNET OR MAIL
Denbury
stockholders of record may submit their proxies by:
Telephone. You can vote by telephone by
calling the toll-free number 1-800-690-6903 in the United
States, Canada or Puerto Rico on a touch-tone telephone. You
will then be prompted to enter the control number printed on
your proxy card and to follow the subsequent instructions.
Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day until
11:59 p.m. New York time on March 8, 2010. If you vote
by telephone, you do not need to return your proxy card or
voting instruction card.
Internet. You can vote over the Internet by
accessing the website at
http://www.proxyvote.com
and following the instructions on the secure website. Internet
voting is available 24 hours a day until 11:59 p.m.
New York time on March 8, 2010. If you vote over the
Internet, you do not need to return your proxy card or voting
instruction card.
Mail. You can vote by mail by completing,
signing, dating and mailing your proxy card or voting
instruction card in the postage-paid envelope included with this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Encore
stockholders of record may submit their
proxies by:
Telephone. You can vote by telephone by
calling the toll-free number 1-866-540-5760 in the United
States, Canada or Puerto Rico on a touch-tone telephone. You
will then be prompted to enter the control number printed on
your proxy card and to follow the subsequent instructions.
Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day until
11:59 p.m. New York time on March 8, 2010. If you vote
by telephone, you do not need to return your proxy card or
voting instruction card.
Internet. You can vote over the Internet by
accessing the website at
http://www.proxyvoting.com/eac
and following the instructions on the secure website. Internet
voting is available 24 hours a day until 11:59 p.m.
New York time on March 8, 2010. If you vote over the
Internet, you do not need to return your proxy card or voting
instruction card.
Mail. You can vote by mail by completing,
signing, dating and mailing your proxy card or voting
instruction card in the postage-paid envelope included with this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
If you
hold your Denbury or Encore shares through a bank, broker,
custodian or other record holder:
Please refer to your proxy card or voting instruction form or
the information forwarded by your bank, broker, custodian or
other record holder to see which voting methods are available to
you.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
F-1
|
LIST OF ANNEXES
|
|
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
B-1
|
|
|
C-1
|
|
|
D-1
|
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER
The following are answers to common questions that you may
have regarding the merger and your special meeting. Denbury and
Encore urge you to read carefully the remainder of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus because the information in this
section may not provide all the information that might be
important to you in determining how to vote. Additional
important information is also contained in the annexes to, and
the documents incorporated by reference in, this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information on page 117.
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What will happen in the merger? |
|
A: |
|
The proposed merger will combine the businesses of Denbury and
Encore. At the effective time of the merger, Encore will merge
with and into Denbury. Denbury will be the surviving entity. As
a result of the merger, Encore will cease to exist and Denbury
will continue as a public company. Following the merger, the
combined company will be an independent oil and gas company with
an anticipated enterprise value of approximately
$9.5 billion based on the closing price of Denbury common
stock on February 3, 2010. |
|
|
|
After the merger, the current stockholders of Denbury and the
current stockholders of Encore who receive shares of Denbury
common stock in the merger will be the stockholders of Denbury. |
|
Q: |
|
Why am I receiving this document? |
|
A: |
|
Denbury and Encore are delivering this document to you because
it is a joint proxy statement being used by both the Denbury and
Encore boards of directors to solicit proxies of Denbury and
Encore stockholders in connection with the special meetings to
adopt the merger agreement. In addition, this document is a
prospectus being delivered to Encore stockholders because
Denbury is offering shares of its common stock to Encore
stockholders in exchange for shares of Encore common stock in
connection with the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
What are holders of Encore common stock being asked to vote
on? |
|
A: |
|
Holders of Encore common stock are being asked to: |
|
|
|
adopt the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
approve the adjournment of the special meeting, if
necessary or appropriate to permit the solicitation of
additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time
of the special meeting to adopt the merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
act upon other business that may properly come
before the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of
the special meeting.
|
|
Q: |
|
What are holders of Denbury common stock being asked to vote
on? |
|
A: |
|
Holders of Denbury common stock are being asked to: |
|
|
|
adopt the merger agreement, which provides for,
among other things, the merger of Encore with and into Denbury
and the issuance of Denbury common stock to Encore stockholders
as part of the merger consideration;
|
|
|
|
approve the adjournment of the special meeting, if
necessary or appropriate to permit the solicitation of
additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time
of the special meeting to adopt the merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
act upon other business that may properly come
before the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of
the special meeting.
|
|
|
|
Adoption of the merger agreement will constitute stockholder
approval of the issuance of Denbury common stock as part of the
merger consideration for purposes of the New York Stock Exchange
rule requiring that approval. |
1
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Why have Denbury and Encore decided to merge? |
|
A: |
|
Denbury and Encore believe that the merger will provide
strategic and financial benefits to stockholders, customers and
employees, including: |
|
|
|
creation of one of the largest crude oil focused
independent exploration and production companies in North
America;
|
|
|
|
nearly doubling Denburys potential oil
reserves (prior to the Conroe acquisition) recoverable through
enhanced oil recovery techniques, or EOR, and increasing
potential for further EOR growth in the Gulf Coast and Rocky
Mountain regions;
|
|
|
|
payment to Encore stockholders of a premium over the
closing price of Encores common stock immediately before
announcement of the merger agreement, the closing price of
Encores common stock on the 20th trading day prior to the
date of the Encore board meeting and the
52-week high
closing price of Encores common stock, with collar
protection, and an ability to participate in equity ownership of
the combined company following the merger; and
|
|
|
|
accretions to cash flow and proved reserves per
share for Denbury stockholders, anticipated reductions in
combined general and administrative and operational costs
through the realization of synergies and, a potential reduction
in cost of capital through the size, scale and diversification
of the combined company.
|
|
Q: |
|
Why is my vote important? |
|
A: |
|
If you do not return your proxy card by mail or submit your
proxy by telephone or over the Internet or vote in person at
your special meeting, it may be difficult for Denbury and Encore
to obtain the necessary quorums to hold their respective special
meetings. |
|
|
|
In addition, if you are a Denbury stockholder, your failure
to vote will have the same effect as a vote against
adoption of the merger agreement. With respect to the
proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or
appropriate in order to solicit additional proxies, an
abstention will have the same effect as a vote
against the proposal. Denburys board of
directors recommends unanimously that Denbury stockholders vote
FOR the adoption of the merger agreement and
FOR the adjournment of the Denbury special meeting,
if necessary or appropriate to permit further solicitation of
proxies. |
|
|
|
If you are an Encore stockholder, your failure to vote will
have the same effect as a vote against adoption of
the merger agreement. With respect to the proposal to
adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate in
order to solicit additional proxies, an abstention will have the
same effect as a vote against the proposal.
Encores board of directors recommends unanimously that
Encore stockholders vote FOR the adoption of the
merger agreement and FOR the adjournment of the
Encore special meeting, if necessary or appropriate to permit
further solicitation of proxies. |
|
|
|
No matter how many shares you own, you are encouraged to
vote. |
|
Q: |
|
When and where are the special meetings? |
|
A: |
|
The Denbury special meeting will take place on March 9,
2010 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 5100 Tennyson
Parkway, Suite 1200, Plano, Texas 75024. |
|
|
|
The Encore special meeting will take place on March 9, 2010
at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 777 Main Street,
Suite 900, Fort Worth, Texas 76102. |
|
|
|
For additional information relating to the Denbury and Encore
special meetings, see The Stockholder Meetings
beginning on page 41. |
|
Q: |
|
What will I receive in the merger in exchange for my shares
of Encore common stock? |
|
A: |
|
Under the merger agreement, Encore stockholders may elect to
receive consideration consisting of cash, shares of Denbury
common stock or a combination of both in exchange for their
shares of Encore common stock, subject to a proration feature.
Encore stockholders electing to receive a mix of cash and stock
consideration and non-electing stockholders will receive $15.00
in cash and between 2.0698 and 2.6336 shares |
2
|
|
|
|
|
of Denbury common stock in exchange for each Encore share.
Subject to proration, Encore stockholders electing to receive
all cash will receive $50.00 per Encore share and Encore
stockholders electing to receive only Denbury common stock will
receive between 2.9568 and 3.7622 shares of Denbury common
stock in exchange for each Encore share. The actual number of
shares of Denbury common stock to be issued to Encore
stockholders receiving either all stock or a mix of cash and
stock consideration will be determined under a collar mechanism
based upon the volume weighted average price of Denbury common
stock for the
20-day
trading period ending on the second full trading day prior to
the effective time of the merger (which is referred to as the
Denbury
20-day
average price in this joint proxy statement/prospectus). For a
more complete description of what Encore stockholders will be
entitled to receive pursuant to the merger, see Terms of
the Merger Agreement Conversion of Encore
Stock beginning on page 93. |
|
Q: |
|
Is the value of the per share consideration that I receive
for my Encore shares expected to be substantially equivalent
regardless of which election I make? |
|
A: |
|
Encore stockholders receiving all cash consideration will
receive $50.00 in cash per Encore share. Encore stockholders
receiving consideration that includes Denbury common stock will
receive either only Denbury common stock, or a combination of
cash and Denbury common stock, that will have a value, as
calculated based on the Denbury
20-day
average price, of $50.00 per Encore share if the
Denbury 20-day
average price is between $13.29 per share and
$16.91 per share. The value those stockholders will
receive, as calculated based on the
Denbury 20-day
average price, will exceed $50.00 per Encore share if the
Denbury 20-day
average price is higher than $16.91 per share, and will be
less than $50.00 per Encore share if the
Denbury 20-day
average price is lower than $13.29 per share. However, the
consideration received by Encore stockholders receiving
consideration that includes Denbury common stock may have a
current value that is higher or lower than $50.00 per
Encore share on the date the consideration is received, as
calculated based on Denbury common stock trading prices
prevailing at that time, even if the
Denbury 20-day
average price is between $13.29 per share and
$16.91 per share. |
|
Q: |
|
If I am an Encore stockholder, when must I elect the type of
merger consideration that I prefer to receive? |
|
A: |
|
Holders of Encore common stock who wish to elect the type of
merger consideration they prefer to receive pursuant to the
merger should review and follow carefully the instructions set
forth in the election form provided to Encore stockholders
together with this joint proxy statement/prospectus or in a
separate mailing. These instructions require that a properly
completed and signed election form be received by the exchange
agent by the election deadline, which is 5:00 p.m., New
York time, on March 2, 2010. If an Encore stockholder does
not submit a properly completed and signed election form to the
exchange agent by the election deadline, that stockholder will
receive a mix of cash and stock consideration consisting of
$15.00 in cash and between 2.0698 and 2.6336 shares of
Denbury common stock in exchange for each Encore share. |
|
Q: |
|
What vote is required to approve the merger and related
matters? |
|
A: |
|
For Denbury, the affirmative vote of a majority of its shares of
common stock outstanding and entitled to vote as of the record
date is required to adopt the merger agreement, which provides
for, among other things, the merger of Encore with and into
Denbury and the issuance of Denbury common stock to Encore
stockholders as part of the merger consideration. |
|
|
|
For Encore, the affirmative vote of a majority of its shares of
common stock outstanding and entitled to vote as of the record
date is required to adopt the merger agreement. |
|
|
|
For additional information on the vote required to approve the
merger and related matters, see The Stockholder
Meetings beginning on page 41. |
3
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Is the consummation of the merger subject to any conditions
other than the approval of the stockholders of Denbury and
Encore? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. In addition to stockholder approval, the consummation of
the merger is contingent upon the following: |
|
|
|
the absence of any law or court order that prohibits
the merger;
|
|
|
|
the shares of Denbury common stock to be issued
pursuant to the merger will have been approved for listing on
the New York Stock Exchange;
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness of the registration statement on
Form S-4,
of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part, and no
pending stop order or proceeding seeking a stop order relating
thereto;
|
|
|
|
the receipt of tax opinions from counsel for each of
Denbury and Encore to the effect that the merger will be treated
as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (which is referred to as the
Code in this joint proxy statement/prospectus), and that each of
Denbury and Encore will be a party to the reorganization within
the meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code;
|
|
|
|
Denburys receipt of financing as contemplated
in the merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
other customary conditions, including the absence of
a material adverse effect on Denbury or Encore.
|
|
Q: |
|
What do I need to do now? |
|
A: |
|
After reading and considering carefully the information
contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, please vote
promptly by calling the toll-free number listed on your proxy
card, accessing the Internet website listed on your proxy card
or completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card in
the enclosed postage-paid envelope. If you hold your stock in
street name through a bank or broker, you must
direct your bank or broker to vote in accordance with the
instructions you have received from your bank or broker.
Submitting your proxy by telephone, Internet or mail or
directing your bank or broker to vote your shares will ensure
that your shares are represented and voted at your special
meeting. For additional information on voting procedures, see
The Stockholder Meetings beginning on page 41. |
|
Q: |
|
How will my proxy be voted? |
|
A: |
|
If you vote by telephone, over the Internet or by completing,
signing, dating and returning your signed proxy card, your proxy
will be voted in accordance with your instructions. The proxy
confers discretionary authority to the named proxies.
Accordingly, if you complete, sign, date and return your proxy
card and do not indicate how you want to vote, your shares will
be voted as follows: |
|
|
|
in the case of Denbury, FOR adoption of
the merger agreement and FOR the adjournment of the
Denbury special meeting, if necessary or appropriate to permit
further solicitation of proxies; and
|
|
|
|
in the case of Encore, FOR the adoption
of the merger agreement, and FOR the adjournment of
the Encore special meeting, if necessary or appropriate to
permit further solicitation of proxies.
|
|
|
|
For additional information on voting procedures, see The
Stockholder Meetings beginning on page 41. |
|
Q: |
|
If my broker holds my shares in street name, will
my broker automatically vote my shares for me? |
|
A: |
|
No. If you do not provide your broker with instructions
on how to vote your street name shares, your broker
will not be permitted to vote them on your behalf.
Therefore, you should be sure to provide your broker with
instructions on how to vote your shares, following the
directions your broker provides to you. Please check the voting
form used by your broker to see if the broker offers telephone
or Internet voting. |
|
Q: |
|
What if I fail to instruct my broker? |
|
A: |
|
If you fail to instruct your broker to vote your shares and the
broker submits an unvoted proxy, referred to as a broker
non-vote, the broker non-vote will be counted toward a quorum at
your special meeting, but |
4
|
|
|
|
|
effectively will be treated as a vote against the
proposal to adopt the merger agreement, unless you appear and
vote in person at your special meeting. |
|
|
|
For information on changing your vote if your shares are held in
street name, see The Stockholder
Meetings beginning on page 41. |
|
Q: |
|
Is the merger expected to be taxable to Encore
stockholders? |
|
A: |
|
It is expected that the merger will be treated as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code and, therefore, it is expected that holders of Encore
common stock will not recognize any gain or loss for federal
income tax purposes to the extent they exchange their shares of
Encore common stock for shares of Denbury common stock pursuant
to the merger. However, to the extent holders of Encore common
stock exchange their Encore common stock for cash, the merger
will be taxable. |
|
|
|
You should read Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences of the Merger beginning on
page 107 for a description of the material United States
federal income tax consequences of the merger. Tax matters can
be complicated and the tax consequences of the merger to you
will depend on your particular situation. You should consult
your tax advisors to determine the tax consequences of the
merger to you. |
|
Q: |
|
What does it mean if I receive more than one set of
materials? |
|
A: |
|
This means you own shares of both Denbury and Encore or you own
shares of Denbury or Encore that are registered under different
names. For example, you may own some shares directly as a
stockholder of record and other shares through a broker, or you
may own shares through more than one broker. In these
situations, you will receive multiple sets of proxy materials.
You must complete, sign, date and return all of the proxy cards
or follow the instructions for any alternative voting procedures
on each of the proxy cards you receive in order to vote all of
the shares you own. Each proxy card you receive will come with
its own postage-paid return envelope; if you vote by mail, make
sure you return each proxy card in the return envelope that
accompanied that proxy card. |
|
Q: |
|
What can I do if I want to change or revoke my vote? |
|
A: |
|
Regardless of the method you used to cast your vote, if you are
a holder of record, you may change your vote: |
|
|
|
by completing, signing, dating and returning a new
proxy card with a later date;
|
|
|
|
by calling the toll-free number listed on the proxy
card or by accessing the Internet website listed on the proxy
card by 11:59 p.m. New York time on March 8, 2010; or
|
|
|
|
by attending your special meeting and voting by
ballot at your special meeting.
|
|
|
|
You may also revoke your proxy card by sending a notice of
revocation, which must be received prior to your special
meeting, to the designated representative of the applicable
company at the address provided under Where You Can Find
More Information on page 117. |
|
|
|
If you hold your shares in street name and wish to
change or revoke your vote, please refer to the information on
the voting instruction form included with these materials and
forwarded to you by your bank, broker, custodian or other record
holder to see your voting options. |
|
|
|
For additional information on changing your vote, see The
Stockholder Meetings beginning on page 41. |
|
Q: |
|
What will happen to Encores stock options and
restricted stock in the merger? |
|
A: |
|
At the effective time of the merger, each outstanding option to
purchase shares of Encore common stock will fully vest and will
be converted into an obligation of Denbury to pay to the option
holder an amount in cash equal to the product of (i) the
number of shares of Encore common stock subject to the option
and (ii) the excess, if any, of the aggregate consideration
per share (or with respect to certain pre-2005 options, the
highest price per share paid within 60 days prior to the
merger) over the exercise price per share previously subject to
the option. |
|
|
|
Immediately prior to the effective time of the merger, each
outstanding award of Encore restricted stock granted by Encore
will become fully vested and each holder will have the right to
make the same elections |
5
|
|
|
|
|
as a holder of Encore common stock, except that any shares of
Encore restricted stock granted as a 2009 bonus pursuant to the
Encore annual incentive program will be converted into
restricted shares of Denbury common stock. For more information,
see Terms of the Merger Agreement Employee
Stock Options; Restricted Shares on page 94. |
|
Q: |
|
If I am a holder of Encore common stock with shares
represented by stock certificates, should I send in my Encore
stock certificates now? |
|
A: |
|
No. Please do not send in your Encore stock certificates
with your proxy card. Rather, prior to the election deadline,
send your completed, signed election form, together with your
Encore common stock certificates (or a properly completed notice
of guaranteed delivery) to the exchange agent. The election form
for your Encore shares and your instructions will be delivered
to you together with this joint proxy statement/prospectus or in
a separate mailing. If your shares of Encore common stock are
held in street name by your broker or other nominee,
you should follow your brokers or nominees
instructions for making an election. |
|
Q: |
|
Are Encore stockholders entitled to appraisal rights? |
|
A: |
|
Encore stockholders may, under certain circumstances, be
entitled to appraisal rights under Section 262 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, or the DGCL.
For more information regarding appraisal rights, see The
Merger Appraisal Rights beginning on
page 87. In addition, a copy of Section 262 of the
DGCL is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as
Annex D. |
|
Q: |
|
Are there any risks in the merger that I should consider? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. There are risks associated with all business combinations,
including the proposed merger. We have described certain of
these risks and other risks in more detail under Risk
Factors beginning on page 34. |
|
Q: |
|
Will Denbury stockholders receive any shares as a result of
the merger? |
|
A: |
|
No. Denbury stockholders will continue to hold the Denbury
shares they currently own. |
|
Q: |
|
When do you expect to complete the merger? |
|
A: |
|
Denbury and Encore expect to complete the merger during the
first quarter of 2010, although completion by any particular
date cannot be assured. |
|
Q: |
|
Where can I find more information about the companies? |
|
A: |
|
Both Denbury and Encore file periodic reports and other
information with the SEC. You may read and copy this information
at the SECs public reference facility. Please call the SEC
at
1-800-SEC-0330
for information about this facility. This information is also
available through the SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov
and at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange. Both
companies also maintain websites. You can obtain Denburys
SEC filings at
http://www.denbury.com
and you can obtain Encores SEC filings at
http://www.encoreacq.com.
We do not intend for information contained on or accessible
through our respective websites to be part of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, other than the documents that we file with
the SEC that are incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. |
|
|
|
In addition, you may obtain some of this information directly
from the companies. For a more detailed description of the
information available, see Where You Can Find More
Information on page 117. |
|
Q: |
|
Whom should I call if I have questions about the special
meeting or the merger? |
|
A: |
|
Denbury stockholders should call Georgeson Inc., Denburys
proxy solicitor, at
(866) 482-4969. |
|
|
|
Encore stockholders should call BNY Mellon Shareowner Services,
Encores proxy solicitor, at
(800) 814-0304. |
|
|
|
If you have more questions about the merger, please call the
Investor Relations Department of Denbury at
(972) 673-2000
or the Investor Relations Department of Encore at
(817) 877-9955. |
6
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information from this
document and may not contain all of the information that is
important to you. To understand the merger fully and for a more
complete description of the terms of the merger, you should read
carefully this entire document and the other available
information referred to under Where You Can Find More
Information. We encourage you to read the merger
agreement, the legal document governing the merger, which is
included as Annex A to this document and incorporated by
reference herein. We have included page references in the
discussion below to direct you to more complete descriptions of
the topics presented in this summary. We have defined certain
oil and gas industry terms used in this document in the
Glossary of Oil and Gas Terms.
The
Companies
Denbury Resources Inc.
5100 Tennyson Pkwy., Suite 1200
Plano, Texas 75024
(972) 673-2000
Denbury is a Delaware corporation engaged in the acquisition,
development, operation and exploration of oil and natural gas
properties in the Gulf Coast region of the United States,
primarily in Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas and Alabama. Denbury
is the largest oil and natural gas producer in Mississippi, and
it owns the largest reserves of
CO2
used for tertiary oil recovery east of the Mississippi River.
Denburys goal is to increase the value of acquired
properties through a combination of exploitation, drilling and
proven engineering extraction processes, with its most
significant emphasis relating to tertiary recovery operations.
Since Denbury acquired its first
CO2
tertiary flood in Mississippi in 1999, it has gradually
increased its emphasis on these types of operations.
Denburys tertiary operations have grown to the point that,
as of December 31, 2008, approximately 50% of its proved
reserves were proved tertiary oil reserves. As of
December 31, 2008, Denbury had total tertiary-related
proved oil reserves of approximately 125.8 MMBbls.
Denburys production from tertiary operations has increased
from approximately 1,350 Bbls/d in 1999, the then existing
production at Little Creek Field at the time of acquisition, to
an average of 24,347 Bbls/d during the third quarter of
2009. Denbury expects this production to continue to increase
for several years as Denbury expands its tertiary operations to
additional fields that it owns. Denbury believes that there are
many additional oil fields in its operating areas that can be
acquired and flooded with
CO2,
providing potential growth opportunities beyond its existing
inventory of oil fields.
Denburys estimated total proved reserves at
December 31, 2008 were 179.1 MMBbls of oil and
428 Bcf of natural gas, based on the December 31, 2008
NYMEX oil price of $44.60 per barrel adjusted to prices received
by field and a Henry Hub natural gas cash price of $5.71 per
MMBtu, also adjusted to prices received by field. On a BOE
basis, Denburys proved reserves were 250.5 MMBOE at
December 31, 2008, of which approximately 72% was oil and
approximately 58% was proved developed. Denbury recently
announced information concerning its 2009 year-end proved
reserves and estimated production. See Denbury
The Combined Company Recent Events beginning
on page 45.
Denbury continues to emphasize its tertiary recovery operations
because management believes these operations (i) are lower
risk and more predictable than most traditional exploration and
development activities, and (ii) provide a reasonable rate
of return at relatively low oil prices. In addition, Denbury has
virtually no competition for this type of activity in its
geographic area, as generally, from east Texas to Florida, there
are no known significant sources of
CO2
other than those that Denbury owns. Denbury believes that if
significant sources of man-made
CO2
are captured and become available in the future, tertiary
recovery operations provide an economical way to sequester these
greenhouse gases, while recovering additional oil. Denbury has
acquired several old oil fields in its areas of operations with
potential for tertiary recovery and plans to acquire additional
fields. Denbury also continues to expand its
CO2
pipeline infrastructure to transport
CO2.
7
Denburys strategy is focused on the following fundamental
principles:
|
|
|
|
|
remain focused in specific regions where Denbury either has, or
believes it can create, a competitive advantage as a result of
its ownership or use of
CO2
reserves, oil fields and
CO2
infrastructure;
|
|
|
|
acquire properties where management believes additional value
can be created through tertiary recovery operations and a
combination of other exploitation, development, exploration and
marketing techniques;
|
|
|
|
acquire properties that give Denbury a majority working interest
and operational control or where management believes Denbury can
ultimately obtain them;
|
|
|
|
maximize the value of company properties by increasing
production and reserves while controlling costs; and
|
|
|
|
maintain a highly competitive team of experienced and
incentivized personnel.
|
Denburys common stock is listed on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol DNR.
Encore Acquisition Company
777 Main Street, Suite 1400
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
(817) 877-9955
Encore is a Delaware corporation engaged in the acquisition and
development of oil and natural gas reserves from onshore fields
in the United States. Since 1998, Encore has acquired producing
properties with proven reserves and leasehold acreage and grown
the production and proven reserves by drilling, exploring,
reengineering or expanding existing waterflood projects and
applying tertiary recovery techniques. Encores properties
and its oil and natural gas reserves are located in four core
areas:
|
|
|
|
|
the Cedar Creek Anticline, or CCA, in the Williston Basin in
Montana and North Dakota;
|
|
|
|
the Permian Basin in west Texas and southeastern New Mexico;
|
|
|
|
the Rockies, which includes non-CCA assets in the Williston, Big
Horn and Powder River Basins in Wyoming, Montana and North
Dakota and the Paradox Basin in southeastern Utah; and
|
|
|
|
the Mid-Continent region, which includes the Arkoma and Anadarko
Basins in Oklahoma, the North Louisiana Salt Basin and the
East Texas Basin.
|
Encores estimated total proved reserves at
December 31, 2008 were 134.5 MMBbls of oil and
307.5 Bcf of natural gas, based on December 31, 2008
spot market prices of $44.60 per barrel for oil and $5.62 per
Mcf for natural gas. On a BOE basis, Encores proved
reserves were 185.7 MMBOE at December 31, 2008, of
which approximately 72% was oil and approximately 80% was proved
developed. Encore recently announced information concerning its
2009 year-end proved reserves and estimated fourth quarter 2009
production. See Denbury The Combined
Company Recent Events beginning on
page 45.
Encores common stock is listed on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol EAC.
The
Merger
(Page 47)
Denbury and Encore have agreed to combine their businesses
pursuant to the merger agreement described in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Pursuant to the merger agreement, Encore
will merge with and into Denbury. As a result of the merger,
Encore will cease to exist and Denbury will continue as a public
company. The merger agreement is attached as Annex A to
this joint proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated by
reference herein. Denbury and Encore encourage you to read the
merger agreement in its entirety because it is the legal
document that governs the merger.
8
Merger
Consideration (Page 93)
Under the merger agreement, Encore stockholders may elect to
receive consideration consisting of cash, shares of Denbury
common stock or a combination of both in exchange for their
shares of Encore common stock, subject to the proration feature
described below. Encore stockholders electing to receive a mix
of cash and stock consideration and non-electing stockholders
will receive $15.00 in cash and between 2.0698 and
2.6336 shares of Denbury common stock in exchange for each
Encore share. Subject to proration, Encore stockholders electing
to receive all cash will receive $50.00 per Encore share and
Encore stockholders electing to receive only Denbury common
stock will receive between 2.9568 and 3.7622 shares of
Denbury common stock in exchange for each Encore share. The
actual number of shares of Denbury common stock to be issued to
Encore stockholders receiving either all stock or a mix of cash
and stock consideration will be determined under a collar
mechanism based upon the Denbury
20-day
average price. For a more complete description of what Encore
stockholders will be entitled to receive pursuant to the merger,
see Terms of the Merger Agreement Conversion
of Encore Stock on page 93.
The aggregate cash consideration to be received by Encore
stockholders pursuant to the merger will be fixed at an amount
equal to the product of $15.00 and the number of issued and
outstanding shares of Encore common stock immediately prior to
closing of the merger, which cash amount is expected to be
approximately $833.1 million, excluding approximately
$56.2 million in cash payments to Encore stock option
holders. Accordingly, if Encore stockholders elect, in the
aggregate, to receive cash in an amount greater than the
aggregate cash consideration payable under the merger agreement,
or less than the aggregate cash consideration payable under the
merger agreement, then those holders electing to receive either
all cash or all stock consideration, as the case may be, will be
pro rated down and will receive the undersubscribed form of
merger consideration as a portion of the overall consideration
they receive for their shares. As a result, Encore stockholders
that make a valid election to receive all cash or all stock
consideration may not receive merger consideration entirely in
the form elected. See Risk Factors Encore
stockholders electing to receive only cash or only Denbury
common stock may receive a form or combination of consideration
different from the form they elect on page 34.
Denbury will not issue any fractional shares of its common stock
to any holder of Encore common stock upon completion of the
merger. For each fractional share that would otherwise be
issued, Denbury will pay cash (without interest) in an amount
equal to the product of (i) the fractional share and
(ii) the closing price for a share of Denbury common stock
on the business day immediately preceding the closing date. See
Terms of the Merger Agreement Surrender of
Shares; Stock Transfer Books beginning on page 96.
Completion
and Delivery of the Election Form (Page 95)
If you are an Encore stockholder, you have received or will
receive (together with this joint proxy statement/prospectus or
in a separate mailing) an election form with instructions for
making cash and stock elections. You must complete properly and
deliver to the exchange agent your election form along with your
stock certificates (or a properly completed notice of guaranteed
delivery). Do not send your stock certificates or election form
with your proxy card.
Election forms and stock certificates (or a properly completed
notice of guaranteed delivery) must be received by the exchange
agent by the election deadline, which is 5:00 p.m., New
York time, on March 2, 2010. Once you tender your stock
certificates to the exchange agent, you may not transfer your
shares of Encore common stock until the merger is completed,
unless you revoke your election by a written notice to the
exchange agent that is received prior to the election deadline.
If you fail to submit a properly completed election form prior
to the election deadline, you will be deemed not to have made an
election. As a holder making no election, you will receive the
mixed cash and stock consideration.
If you own shares of Encore common stock in street
name through a broker or other nominee and you wish to
make an election, you should seek instructions from the broker
or other nominee holding your shares concerning how to make your
election.
9
If the merger is not completed, stock certificates will be
returned by the exchange agent by first class mail or through
book-entry transfer (in the case of shares of Encore common
stock delivered in book-entry form to the exchange agent).
Treatment
of Stock Options and Restricted Stock (Page 94)
At the effective time of the merger, each outstanding option to
purchase shares of Encore common stock, whether or not then
exercisable or vested, will be converted into an obligation of
Denbury to pay the option holder an amount in cash equal to the
product of (i) the number of shares of Encore common stock
subject to the option and (ii) the excess, if any, of the
aggregate consideration per share (or with respect to certain
pre-2005 options, the highest price per share paid within
60 days prior to the merger) over the exercise price per
share previously subject to the option.
Immediately prior to the effective time of the merger, each
outstanding award of Encore restricted stock will become fully
vested and each holder will have the right to make the same
elections as a holder of Encore common stock, except that any
shares of Encore restricted stock granted as a 2009 bonus
pursuant to the Encore annual incentive program will be
converted into a number of restricted shares of Denbury common
stock determined by multiplying (i) the number of
restricted shares of Encore common stock subject to that grant
by (ii) the exchange ratio used in determining the
consideration payable to Encore stockholders who have elected to
receive only common stock consideration.
Board
Recommendations (Pages 58 and 61)
Encore. Encores board of directors has
unanimously adopted a resolution approving the merger agreement,
declared the merger agreement advisable and determined that the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by it are
fair to and in the best interests of Encore and its stockholders
and recommends unanimously that Encore stockholders vote at the
special meeting to adopt the merger agreement and approve any
adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate
to solicit additional proxies. See The Merger
Background of the Merger beginning on page 47. As
described under the heading The Merger
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger that May be Different
from Your Interests beginning on page 81 of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus, Encores directors and
executive officers will receive financial benefits that may be
different from, or in addition to, those of Encore stockholders.
Denbury. Denburys board of directors has
unanimously adopted a resolution approving the merger agreement
and the transactions contemplated by it, declared the merger
agreement advisable and recommends unanimously that Denbury
stockholders vote at the special meeting to adopt the merger
agreement, which provides for, among other things, the merger of
Encore with and into Denbury and the issuance of Denbury common
stock to Encore stockholders as part of the merger
consideration. See The Merger Background of
the Merger beginning on page 47. In addition,
Denburys board of directors recommends unanimously that
Denbury stockholders vote to approve any adjournment of the
special meeting, if necessary or appropriate to solicit
additional proxies.
Opinions
of Financial Advisors
(Pages 64 and 73)
In deciding to recommend the merger, each of Denbury and Encore
considered an opinion from its financial advisor.
Opinion
of Encores Financial Advisor
Barclays Capital Inc., or Barclays Capital, rendered its opinion
to Encores board of directors that, as of October 31,
2009, based upon and subject to the qualifications, limitations
and assumptions stated in its opinion, the merger consideration
to be received by the stockholders of Encore was fair, from a
financial point of view, to such stockholders.
The full text of the written opinion of Barclays Capital, dated
October 31, 2009, which sets forth assumptions made,
procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the
review undertaken in
10
connection with the opinion, is attached as Annex B to this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. Barclays Capital provided its
opinion for the information and assistance of Encores
board of directors in connection with its consideration of the
merger. The Barclays Capital opinion is not a recommendation as
to how any holder of Encores common stock should vote with
respect to the merger, adoption of the merger agreement or any
other matter.
Pursuant to a letter agreement dated October 9, 2009,
Encore engaged Barclays Capital to act as its financial advisor
in connection with the contemplated transaction. As compensation
for its services in connection with the merger, Encore paid
Barclays Capital $1.0 million upon the delivery of Barclays
Capitals fairness opinion. Additional compensation of
$12.5 million will be payable on completion of the merger,
against which the amount paid for the opinion will be credited.
In addition, Encore has agreed to reimburse Barclays Capital for
its expenses, including attorneys fees and disbursements,
and to indemnify Barclays Capital and related persons against
various liabilities.
Opinion
of Denburys Financial Advisor
Pursuant to an engagement letter dated October 30, 2009,
Denbury retained J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., or
J.P. Morgan, as its financial advisor in connection with
the proposed merger and to deliver a fairness opinion in
connection with the merger.
At the meeting of Denburys board of directors on
October 31, 2009, J.P. Morgan rendered its oral
opinion, subsequently confirmed in writing, to Denburys
board of directors that, as of that date and based upon and
subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in its opinion,
the consideration to be paid by Denbury in the proposed merger
was fair, from a financial point of view, to Denbury.
The full text of the written opinion of J.P. Morgan, which
sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, procedures
followed, matters considered and limitations on the review
undertaken by J.P. Morgan in connection with its opinion,
is attached as Annex C to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference.
Denbury stockholders are urged to read the opinion carefully and
in its entirety.
J.P. Morgans written opinion is addressed to
Denburys board of directors, is directed only to the
consideration to be paid by Denbury in the merger and does not
constitute a recommendation to any Denbury stockholder as to how
that stockholder should vote at the Denbury special meeting. The
summary of the opinion of J.P. Morgan set forth in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the full text of the opinion.
For services rendered in connection with the merger, Denbury has
agreed to pay J.P. Morgan $12.0 million,
$3.0 million of which was paid after the public
announcement of the proposed merger, and the remainder of which
will become payable only if the merger is consummated. In
addition, Denbury has agreed to reimburse J.P. Morgan for
its expenses incurred in connection with its services, including
the fees and disbursements of counsel, and will indemnify
J.P. Morgan against certain liabilities, including
liabilities arising under the Federal securities laws.
Board of
Directors and Management of Denbury Following the Merger
(Page 81)
Denburys board of directors and executive officers will
remain the same following the merger as they are immediately
before the merger becomes effective.
11
The
Stockholder Meetings
(Page 41)
Denbury. The Denbury special meeting will be
held for the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the merger
agreement, which provides for, among other things, the merger of
Encore with and into Denbury and the issuance of Denbury common
stock to Encore stockholders as part of the merger consideration;
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote upon any adjournment of the special
meeting, if necessary or appropriate to solicit additional
proxies in favor of the foregoing proposal; and
|
|
|
|
to transact any other business that may properly come before the
special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the
special meeting.
|
Encore. The Encore special meeting will be
held for the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote upon any adjournment of the special
meeting, if necessary or appropriate to solicit additional
proxies in favor of the foregoing proposal; and
|
|
|
|
to transact any other business that may properly come before the
special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the
special meeting.
|
Record
Dates
(Page 42)
Denbury. You may vote at the special meeting
of Denbury stockholders if you owned Denbury common stock at the
close of business on February 3, 2010.
Encore. You may vote at the special meeting of
Encore stockholders if you owned Encore common stock at the
close of business on February 3, 2010.
Votes
Required
(Page 42)
Denbury. Each share of Denbury common stock
outstanding as of the record date will be entitled to one vote
at the Denbury special meeting. Adoption of the merger
agreement, which provides for, among other things, the merger of
Encore with and into Denbury and the issuance of Denbury common
stock to Encore stockholders as part of the merger
consideration, requires the affirmative vote of a majority of
the then outstanding shares of Denbury common stock that are
entitled to vote as of the record date. Any adjournment of the
special meeting, if necessary or appropriate to solicit
additional proxies requires the affirmative vote of the holders
of Denbury common stock representing a majority of the votes
present in person or by proxy at the special meeting entitled to
vote.
If a Denbury stockholder abstains from voting, that action will
be the equivalent of a vote against all of the
matters to be voted upon. A broker non-vote will be the
equivalent of a vote against the adoption of the
merger agreement. A broker non-vote will have no effect on any
adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate
to solicit additional proxies.
Encore. Each share of Encore common stock
outstanding as of the record date is entitled to one vote at the
Encore special meeting. Adoption of the merger agreement by
Encore stockholders requires the affirmative vote of a majority
of the then outstanding shares of Encore common stock that are
entitled to vote as of the record date. Any adjournment of the
special meeting, if necessary or appropriate to solicit
additional proxies requires the affirmative vote of the holders
of Encore common stock representing a majority of the votes
present in person or by proxy at the special meeting entitled to
vote.
If an Encore stockholder abstains from voting, that action will
be the equivalent of a vote against all of the
matters to be voted upon. A broker non-vote will be the
equivalent of a vote against adopting the merger
12
agreement, but will have no effect on any adjournment of the
special meeting, if necessary or appropriate to solicit
additional proxies.
An abstention occurs when a stockholder abstains from voting
(either in person or by proxy) on one or more of the proposals.
Broker non-votes occur when a bank, broker or other nominee
returns a proxy but does not have authority to vote on a
particular proposal.
Outstanding
Shares and Share Ownership of Management
(Page 42)
Denbury. As of the record date for the Denbury
special meeting, there were 262,392,777 shares of Denbury
common stock outstanding. Directors and executive officers of
Denbury beneficially owned approximately 3.2% of the outstanding
shares of Denbury common stock on the record date.
Encore. As of the record date for the Encore
special meeting, there were 55,542,510 shares of Encore
common stock outstanding. Directors and executive officers of
Encore beneficially owned approximately 8.6% of the outstanding
shares of Encore common stock on the record date.
Risks
Relating to the Merger
(Page 34)
You should be aware of and consider carefully the risks relating
to the merger described under Risk Factors. These
risks include possible difficulties in combining two companies
that have previously operated independently.
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
(Page 107)
Denbury and Encore each expect the merger to be a tax free
reorganization pursuant to Section 368(a) of the Code to
the extent Encore stockholders receive Denbury common stock
pursuant to the merger.
Please review carefully the information under the caption
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger for a description of the material United States
federal income tax consequences of the merger. The tax
consequences to you will depend on your own situation. Please
consult your tax advisors for a full understanding of the tax
consequences of the merger to you.
Accounting
Treatment
(Page 80)
The merger will be accounted for as an acquisition of Encore by
Denbury using the acquisition method of accounting.
Encore uses the successful efforts method of accounting for its
oil and natural gas properties. Denbury uses, and will continue
to use, post-merger, the full cost method of accounting for its
oil and gas properties.
Appraisal
Rights
(Page 87)
Encore stockholders will, under certain circumstances, be
entitled under Delaware law to exercise appraisal rights and
receive payment for the fair value of their Encore shares if the
merger is completed. However, under Section 262 of the DGCL,
appraisal rights are only available in connection with the
merger if, among other things, holders of Encore stock are
required to accept cash consideration for their Encore shares
(other than cash paid in lieu of fractional shares).
Accordingly, Denbury reserves the right to take the position
that appraisal rights are not available if, after application of
the proration provisions of the merger agreement, all
stockholders who elected to receive all stock consideration and
all stockholders who demanded appraisal of their shares could
have received consideration consisting of only Denbury common
stock and cash paid in lieu of receiving fractional shares of
Denbury common stock as a result of the merger. Encore
stockholders who
13
wish to seek appraisal of their shares are in any case urged to
seek the advice of counsel with respect to the availability of
appraisal rights.
If appraisal rights are available, Encore stockholders who
desire to exercise their appraisal rights must not vote in favor
of the adoption of the merger agreement, must submit a written
demand for an appraisal before the vote on the adoption of the
merger agreement and must continue to hold their Encore shares
through the effective date of the merger. Encore stockholders
must also comply with other procedures as required by
Section 262 of the DGCL. If appraisal rights are available,
Encore stockholders who validly demand appraisal of their shares
in accordance with the DGCL and do not withdraw their demand or
otherwise forfeit their appraisal rights will not receive the
merger consideration. Instead, after completion of the proposed
merger, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will
determine the fair value of their shares exclusive of any value
arising from the proposed merger. This appraisal amount will be
paid in cash and could be more than, the same as or less than
the amount an Encore stockholder would be entitled to receive
under the merger agreement.
The DGCL requirements for exercising appraisal rights are
described in further detail in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, and the relevant section of the DGCL
regarding appraisal rights is reproduced and attached as
Annex D.
Financing
of the Merger
(Page 91)
Denbury has received a financing commitment letter from
J.P. Morgan and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., or JPMorgan
Chase, which is subject to various conditions, for a proposed
new $1.6 billion senior secured revolving credit facility
and a $1.25 billion bridge facility. In place of the bridge
facility, on February 3, 2010, Denbury completed the public
offering of $1 billion of its
81/4%
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2020, which is scheduled to close
on February 10, 2010. See The Merger
Financing of the Merger beginning on page 91 for more
details on the notes offering. These financing sources will be
used to fund the cash portion of the merger consideration
(inclusive of payments due to Encore stock option holders),
refinance certain of Encores existing debt, pay
Encores severance costs, repay Denburys existing
credit facility, pay merger-related transaction costs and
provide additional liquidity. Encore will cooperate with
Denburys efforts to secure the financing and Denbury will
reimburse Encore for the expenses it incurs in performing those
efforts.
Conditions
to the Merger
(Page 103)
The merger will be completed only if the conditions to the
merger are satisfied or waived (if legally permissible),
including, among others, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the adoption of the merger agreement by Encores
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
the adoption of the merger agreement by Denburys
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
the absence of any law or court order that would prohibit,
prevent or enjoin the merger;
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness of the registration statement on
Form S-4
of which this joint proxy
statement/prospectus
is a part, and no pending stop order or proceeding seeking a
stop order relating thereto;
|
|
|
|
the approval of the shares of Denbury common stock to be issued
pursuant to the merger agreement to be listed on the New York
Stock Exchange;
|
|
|
|
the receipt of tax opinions from counsel for each of Denbury and
Encore to the effect that the merger will be treated as a
reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code and that
each of Denbury and Encore will be a party to the reorganization
within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code;
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
Denburys receipt of the financing contemplated by the
merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
other customary conditions, including the absence of a material
adverse effect on Denbury or Encore.
|
Either party to the merger agreement may choose to complete the
merger even though a condition has not been satisfied if the law
allows Encore and Denbury to do so; however, neither Denbury nor
Encore can give any assurance regarding when or if all of the
conditions to the merger will either be satisfied or waived or
that the merger will occur as intended.
Regulatory
Requirements
(Page 91)
The merger is subject to antitrust laws, including the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended
(which is referred to as the HSR Act in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus). Denbury and Encore have made their
respective filings under the HSR Act with the Antitrust Division
of the United States Department of Justice, which is referred to
as the Antitrust Division in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, and the United States Federal Trade
Commission, which is referred to as the FTC in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. On November 30, 2009, the FTC granted
early termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act.
Termination
of the Merger Agreement
(Page 105)
Denbury and Encore can mutually agree to terminate the merger
agreement at any time. Either Denbury or Encore can unilaterally
terminate the merger agreement in various circumstances,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
if the merger has not occurred on or before May 31, 2010,
but neither party may terminate the merger agreement if that
partys breach of any provision of the merger agreement has
contributed to, or otherwise resulted in, the failure of the
merger to occur on or before May 31, 2010;
|
|
|
|
if a court or other governmental authority issues a final,
non-appealable order restraining, enjoining or otherwise
prohibiting the merger;
|
|
|
|
if Encores stockholders or Denburys stockholders
fail to adopt the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
if the Denbury financing condition is not satisfied on or before
May 31, 2010; or
|
|
|
|
if the other party is in material breach of the merger agreement
such that certain conditions set forth in the merger agreement
are not capable of being satisfied and such breach is not cured
prior to the earlier of 30 days after notice of the breach
or May 31, 2010.
|
In addition, Encore may terminate the merger agreement if prior
to the adoption of the merger agreement by Encores
stockholders, Encores board of directors has effected a
change in its recommendation and authorized Encore to enter into
a definitive agreement with respect to a superior proposal.
Termination
Fee
(Page 105)
On a termination of the merger agreement under certain
circumstances, Encore may be required to pay Denbury a
termination fee of either $60 million or $120 million
or Denbury may be required to pay Encore a termination fee of
either $60 million, $120 million or $300 million,
in each case depending on the circumstances of the termination.
In addition, Encore is obligated to reimburse Denbury for up to
$10 million of its expenses related to the merger if
specified termination events occur.
Interests
of Certain Persons in the Merger that May be Different from Your
Interests
(Page 81)
Encores directors and executive officers have interests in
the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the
interests of holders of Encore common stock. These interests
include certain Encore executive officers being entitled to
receive specified severance and other benefits, following the
effective time of the
15
merger. Severance benefits are paid only upon an executive
officers termination for cause or good reason. Some of
these benefits include the following:
Severance
Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
a lump sum cash payment to each of Encores executive
officers in the amount of
2-3 times
their respective annual salaries and bonus;
|
|
|
|
continued medical, dental and life insurance coverage for up to
three years for Encores executive officers;
|
|
|
|
payments to compensate for the imposition of certain federal
excise taxes imposed on Encores executive officers;
|
Other
Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
the vesting of Encore restricted stock and options to purchase
shares of Encores common stock held by Encores
executive officers and directors at the effective time of the
merger and conversion of that stock into the right to receive
the merger consideration (other than restricted stock granted as
a 2009 bonus);
|
|
|
|
entitlement for Encores executive officers to receive an
incentive award that would vest over time from Denbury if they
remain employed by Denbury for 30 days following the
effective time of the merger; and
|
|
|
|
indemnification by Denbury with respect to acts or omissions
performed by Encores directors and executive officers in
their capacities as such.
|
Encores board of directors was aware of these interests
and considered them, among other matters, in making its
recommendation. See The Merger Reasons for the
Merger Encore beginning on page 55.
Acquisition
Proposals
(Page 100)
Encore and its subsidiaries will not, and Encore and its
subsidiaries will direct their respective officers, directors,
investment bankers, attorneys, accountants, financial advisors,
agents and other representatives not to, (i) directly or
indirectly initiate, solicit, knowingly encourage or knowingly
facilitate an acquisition proposal, (ii) participate or
engage in discussions or negotiations with, or disclose any
non-public information to, any other party with respect to an
acquisition proposal, (iii) accept an acquisition proposal
or (iv) enter into any agreement to do any of the foregoing
with respect to an acquisition proposal. However, prior to
obtaining adoption of the merger agreement by Encores
stockholders, Encore or its board of directors may take any
action described in clauses (ii) (iv) above if
Encore receives an unsolicited written acquisition proposal from
a third party and Encores board of directors determines in
good faith (after consultation with its financial advisors and
outside legal counsel) that the proposal constitutes, or could
reasonably be expected to lead to, a transaction more favorable
to its stockholders than the merger.
In addition, prior to adoption of the merger agreement by
Encores stockholders, Encores board of directors may
effect a change in its recommendation of the merger in response
to (i) a superior proposal or (ii) an intervening
event if Encores board of directors concludes in good
faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel) that a
failure to withdraw its recommendation would breach its
fiduciary duties under applicable law.
Prior to obtaining adoption of the merger agreement by
Denburys stockholders, Denburys board of directors
may effect a change in its recommendation of the merger in
response to an intervening event if it determines in good faith
(after consultation with outside legal counsel and, if
appropriate, its financial advisor) that a failure to withdraw
its recommendation would breach its fiduciary duties under
applicable law.
In general, the term intervening event means, with
respect to either party, a material event or circumstance that
was not known or reasonably foreseeable to the board of
directors of that party on the date of the merger agreement (or,
if known, the consequences of which were not known to or
reasonably foreseeable by that board of directors), which event
or circumstance, or material consequences thereof, become
16
known to the board of directors of that party prior to the time
at which that party receives the applicable stockholder
approval, but in no event will any of the following constitute
an intervening event:
|
|
|
|
|
the receipt, existence or terms of an acquisition proposal for
Denbury or of any information or any communication that could
lead to any acquisition by Denbury of any business or assets
other than Encore, or any consequence thereof;
|
|
|
|
any failure to arrange or receive the financing, or any of the
terms or consequences of the financing; or
|
|
|
|
any change in, or event or condition generally affecting, the
oil and natural gas industry or exploration and production
companies, including, without limitation, any change in oil or
natural gas prices or differentials.
|
Material
Differences in the Rights of Stockholders
(Page 111)
Denbury and Encore are both Delaware corporations. Upon
completion of the merger, your rights as stockholders of Denbury
will be governed by its certificate of incorporation and bylaws.
Encore stockholders should consider that Denburys
certificate of incorporation and bylaws differ in some material
respects from Encores certificate of incorporation and
bylaws.
Selected
Historical Consolidated Financial Data
Denbury
The following table sets forth Denburys selected
consolidated historical financial information that has been
derived from (1) Denburys consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and
2004 and the years then ended and (2) Denburys
consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2009
and 2008 and the nine month periods then ended. This disclosure
does not include the effects of the merger. You should read this
financial information in conjunction with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and its consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto in Denburys 2008
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 incorporated by
reference in this document.
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(a)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues and other income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil, natural gas and related product sales
|
|
$
|
600,942
|
|
|
$
|
1,128,548
|
|
|
$
|
1,347,010
|
|
|
$
|
952,788
|
|
|
$
|
716,557
|
|
|
$
|
549,055
|
|
|
$
|
444,777
|
|
CO2
sales and transportation fees
|
|
|
9,708
|
|
|
|
9,705
|
|
|
|
13,858
|
|
|
|
13,630
|
|
|
|
9,376
|
|
|
|
8,119
|
|
|
|
6,276
|
|
Loss on effective hedge contract(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,469
|
)
|
Interest income and other
|
|
|
1,948
|
|
|
|
3,525
|
|
|
|
4,834
|
|
|
|
6,642
|
|
|
|
5,603
|
|
|
|
3,218
|
|
|
|
2,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
612,598
|
|
|
|
1,141,778
|
|
|
|
1,365,702
|
|
|
|
973,060
|
|
|
|
731,536
|
|
|
|
560,392
|
|
|
|
382,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
|
241,908
|
|
|
|
228,134
|
|
|
|
307,550
|
|
|
|
230,932
|
|
|
|
167,271
|
|
|
|
108,550
|
|
|
|
87,107
|
|
Production taxes and marketing expenses
|
|
|
24,294
|
|
|
|
50,978
|
|
|
|
55,770
|
|
|
|
43,130
|
|
|
|
31,993
|
|
|
|
23,553
|
|
|
|
17,569
|
|
Transportation expense Genesis
|
|
|
6,143
|
|
|
|
5,623
|
|
|
|
7,982
|
|
|
|
5,961
|
|
|
|
4,358
|
|
|
|
4,029
|
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
CO2
operating expenses
|
|
|
3,442
|
|
|
|
2,836
|
|
|
|
4,216
|
|
|
|
4,214
|
|
|
|
3,190
|
|
|
|
2,251
|
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
79,828
|
|
|
|
45,821
|
|
|
|
60,374
|
|
|
|
48,972
|
|
|
|
43,014
|
|
|
|
28,540
|
|
|
|
21,461
|
|
Interest, net of amounts capitalized(c)
|
|
|
36,960
|
|
|
|
23,988
|
|
|
|
32,596
|
|
|
|
30,830
|
|
|
|
23,575
|
|
|
|
17,978
|
|
|
|
19,468
|
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
177,145
|
|
|
|
160,896
|
|
|
|
221,792
|
|
|
|
195,900
|
|
|
|
149,165
|
|
|
|
98,802
|
|
|
|
97,527
|
|
Commodity derivative expense (income)
|
|
|
177,061
|
|
|
|
43,591
|
|
|
|
(200,053
|
)
|
|
|
18,597
|
|
|
|
(19,828
|
)
|
|
|
28,962
|
|
|
|
15,358
|
|
Abandoned acquisition cost(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,426
|
|
|
|
30,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-down of oil and natural gas properties(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
746,781
|
|
|
|
592,293
|
|
|
|
746,828
|
|
|
|
578,536
|
|
|
|
402,738
|
|
|
|
312,665
|
|
|
|
260,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net income (loss) of Genesis
|
|
|
5,802
|
|
|
|
3,796
|
|
|
|
5,354
|
|
|
|
(1,110
|
)
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(128,381
|
)
|
|
|
553,281
|
|
|
|
624,228
|
|
|
|
393,414
|
|
|
|
329,574
|
|
|
|
248,041
|
|
|
|
121,840
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income taxes
|
|
|
18,140
|
|
|
|
44,769
|
|
|
|
40,812
|
|
|
|
30,074
|
|
|
|
19,865
|
|
|
|
27,177
|
|
|
|
22,929
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(67,869
|
)
|
|
|
163,909
|
|
|
|
195,020
|
|
|
|
110,193
|
|
|
|
107,252
|
|
|
|
54,393
|
|
|
|
16,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(78,652
|
)
|
|
$
|
344,603
|
|
|
$
|
388,396
|
|
|
$
|
253,147
|
|
|
$
|
202,457
|
|
|
$
|
166,471
|
|
|
$
|
82,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share basic(e)
|
|
$
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.41
|
|
|
$
|
1.59
|
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
Net income (loss) per share diluted(e)
|
|
$
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
246,156
|
|
|
|
243,604
|
|
|
|
243,935
|
|
|
|
240,065
|
|
|
|
233,101
|
|
|
|
223,485
|
|
|
|
219,482
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
246,156
|
|
|
|
252,708
|
|
|
|
252,530
|
|
|
|
252,101
|
|
|
|
247,547
|
|
|
|
239,267
|
|
|
|
229,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
406,434
|
|
|
$
|
632,771
|
|
|
$
|
774,519
|
|
|
$
|
570,214
|
|
|
$
|
461,810
|
|
|
$
|
360,960
|
|
|
$
|
168,652
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(736,390
|
)
|
|
|
(617,677
|
)
|
|
|
(994,659
|
)
|
|
|
(762,513
|
)
|
|
|
(856,627
|
)
|
|
|
(383,687
|
)
|
|
|
(93,550
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
334,576
|
|
|
|
100,109
|
|
|
|
177,102
|
|
|
|
198,533
|
|
|
|
283,601
|
|
|
|
154,777
|
|
|
|
(66,251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30,
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,903,260
|
|
|
$
|
3,468,532
|
|
|
$
|
3,589,674
|
|
|
$
|
2,771,077
|
|
|
$
|
2,139,837
|
|
|
$
|
1,505,069
|
|
|
$
|
992,706
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
1,196,061
|
|
|
|
776,991
|
|
|
|
852,767
|
|
|
|
680,330
|
|
|
|
507,786
|
|
|
|
373,591
|
|
|
|
223,397
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,790,659
|
|
|
|
1,787,985
|
|
|
|
1,840,068
|
|
|
|
1,404,378
|
|
|
|
1,106,059
|
|
|
|
733,662
|
|
|
|
541,672
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Effective January 1, 2006, Denbury adopted new guidance
issued by the Financial Accounting Standard Board
(FASB) in the Compensation-Stock
Compensation topic of the FASB Accounting Standards
Codificationtm
(FASC) which prospectively required Denbury to
record compensation expense for stock incentive awards. |
|
(b) |
|
Amount represents Denburys net loss on commodity contracts
that qualified for hedge accounting treatment, prior to
Denburys discontinuance of hedge accounting effective
January 1, 2005. |
|
(c) |
|
Denburys capitalized interest was $48.7 million and
$19.5 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively, and $29.2 million,
$20.4 million, $11.3 million, $1.6 million and $0
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively. |
18
|
|
|
(d) |
|
In 2008, Denbury had a full cost ceiling test write-down of
$226.0 million ($140.1 million net of tax) and pre-tax
expense of $30.6 million associated with a cancelled
acquisition. |
|
(e) |
|
On December 5, 2007 and October 31, 2005, Denbury
split its common stock on a
2-for-1
basis. Information relating to all prior years shares and
earnings per share has been retroactively restated to reflect
the stock splits. |
Encore
The following table sets forth selected consolidated historical
financial information that has been derived from
(1) Encores consolidated financial statements as of
December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 and the years
then ended and (2) Encores consolidated financial
statements as of September 30, 2009 and 2008 and the nine
months then ended. This selected historical consolidated
financial data does not include the effect of the merger. You
should read this financial information in conjunction with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and its consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto in Encores Current
Report on Form 8-K filed January 25, 2010, and
Encores Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, which are
incorporated by reference in this document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,(a)(b)
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,(a)(b)
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues(c):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
$
|
374,915
|
|
|
$
|
776,001
|
|
|
$
|
897,443
|
|
|
$
|
562,817
|
|
|
$
|
346,974
|
|
|
$
|
307,959
|
|
|
$
|
220,649
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
86,908
|
|
|
|
182,973
|
|
|
|
227,479
|
|
|
|
150,107
|
|
|
|
146,325
|
|
|
|
149,365
|
|
|
|
77,884
|
|
Marketing(d)
|
|
|
2,008
|
|
|
|
8,740
|
|
|
|
10,496
|
|
|
|
42,021
|
|
|
|
147,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
463,831
|
|
|
|
967,714
|
|
|
|
1,135,418
|
|
|
|
754,945
|
|
|
|
640,862
|
|
|
|
457,324
|
|
|
|
298,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating(e)
|
|
|
122,817
|
|
|
|
130,013
|
|
|
|
175,115
|
|
|
|
143,426
|
|
|
|
98,194
|
|
|
|
69,744
|
|
|
|
47,807
|
|
Production, ad valorem and severance taxes
|
|
|
48,074
|
|
|
|
95,845
|
|
|
|
110,644
|
|
|
|
74,585
|
|
|
|
49,780
|
|
|
|
45,601
|
|
|
|
30,313
|
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
217,361
|
|
|
|
159,114
|
|
|
|
228,252
|
|
|
|
183,980
|
|
|
|
113,463
|
|
|
|
85,627
|
|
|
|
48,522
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,292
|
|
|
|
59,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration
|
|
|
43,801
|
|
|
|
30,462
|
|
|
|
39,207
|
|
|
|
27,726
|
|
|
|
30,519
|
|
|
|
14,443
|
|
|
|
3,935
|
|
General and administrative(e)
|
|
|
40,743
|
|
|
|
36,549
|
|
|
|
48,421
|
|
|
|
39,124
|
|
|
|
23,194
|
|
|
|
17,268
|
|
|
|
12,059
|
|
Marketing(d)
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
|
|
9,362
|
|
|
|
9,570
|
|
|
|
40,549
|
|
|
|
148,571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative fair value loss (gain)(g)
|
|
|
(741
|
)
|
|
|
82,093
|
|
|
|
(346,236
|
)
|
|
|
112,483
|
|
|
|
(24,388
|
)
|
|
|
5,290
|
|
|
|
5,011
|
|
Loss on early redemption of debt(h)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
7,116
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
5,816
|
|
|
|
1,970
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating
|
|
|
22,303
|
|
|
|
9,801
|
|
|
|
12,975
|
|
|
|
17,066
|
|
|
|
8,053
|
|
|
|
9,254
|
|
|
|
5,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
503,086
|
|
|
|
579,535
|
|
|
|
339,458
|
|
|
|
644,755
|
|
|
|
449,356
|
|
|
|
266,935
|
|
|
|
152,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(39,255
|
)
|
|
|
388,179
|
|
|
|
795,960
|
|
|
|
110,190
|
|
|
|
191,506
|
|
|
|
190,389
|
|
|
|
145,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
(57,009
|
)
|
|
|
(54,669
|
)
|
|
|
(73,173
|
)
|
|
|
(88,704
|
)
|
|
|
(45,131
|
)
|
|
|
(34,055
|
)
|
|
|
(23,459
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
3,090
|
|
|
|
3,898
|
|
|
|
2,667
|
|
|
|
1,429
|
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses
|
|
|
(55,198
|
)
|
|
|
(51,579
|
)
|
|
|
(69,275
|
)
|
|
|
(86,037
|
)
|
|
|
(43,702
|
)
|
|
|
(33,016
|
)
|
|
|
(23,219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(94,453
|
)
|
|
|
336,600
|
|
|
|
726,685
|
|
|
|
24,153
|
|
|
|
147,804
|
|
|
|
157,373
|
|
|
|
122,639
|
|
Income tax benefit (provision)
|
|
|
25,254
|
|
|
|
(118,595
|
)
|
|
|
(241,621
|
)
|
|
|
(14,476
|
)
|
|
|
(55,406
|
)
|
|
|
(53,948
|
)
|
|
|
(40,492
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income (loss)
|
|
|
(69,199
|
)
|
|
|
218,005
|
|
|
|
485,064
|
|
|
|
9,677
|
|
|
|
92,398
|
|
|
|
103,425
|
|
|
|
82,147
|
|
Less: net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
9,669
|
|
|
|
(16,198
|
)
|
|
|
(54,252
|
)
|
|
|
7,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to EAC stockholders
|
|
$
|
(59,530
|
)
|
|
$
|
201,807
|
|
|
$
|
430,812
|
|
|
$
|
17,155
|
|
|
$
|
92,398
|
|
|
$
|
103,425
|
|
|
$
|
82,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(1.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.78
|
|
|
$
|
8.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
(i)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.67
|
|
|
$
|
8.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
$
|
2.07
|
|
|
$
|
1.71
|
(i)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
51,964
|
|
|
|
52,466
|
|
|
|
52,270
|
|
|
|
53,170
|
|
|
|
51,865
|
|
|
|
48,682
|
|
|
|
47,090
|
(i)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
51,964
|
|
|
|
53,134
|
|
|
|
52,866
|
|
|
|
53,629
|
|
|
|
52,356
|
|
|
|
49,303
|
|
|
|
47,522
|
(i)
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,(a)(b)
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,(a)(b)
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash flows Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
633,153
|
|
|
$
|
528,987
|
|
|
$
|
663,237
|
|
|
$
|
319,707
|
|
|
$
|
297,333
|
|
|
$
|
292,269
|
|
|
$
|
171,821
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(710,316
|
)
|
|
|
(536,094
|
)
|
|
|
(728,346
|
)
|
|
|
(929,556
|
)
|
|
|
(397,430
|
)
|
|
|
(573,560
|
)
|
|
|
(433,470
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
81,807
|
|
|
|
9,230
|
|
|
|
65,444
|
|
|
|
610,790
|
|
|
|
99,206
|
|
|
|
281,842
|
|
|
|
262,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30,(a)(b)
|
|
|
As of December 31,(a)(b)
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,713,814
|
|
|
$
|
3,286,141
|
|
|
$
|
3,633,195
|
|
|
$
|
2,784,561
|
|
|
$
|
2,006,900
|
|
|
$
|
1,705,705
|
|
|
$
|
1,123,400
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,243,496
|
|
|
|
1,217,604
|
|
|
|
1,319,811
|
|
|
|
1,120,236
|
|
|
|
661,696
|
|
|
|
673,189
|
|
|
|
379,000
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
1,668,765
|
|
|
|
1,239,392
|
|
|
|
1,483,248
|
|
|
|
1,070,689
|
|
|
|
816,865
|
|
|
|
546,781
|
|
|
|
473,575
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Encore acquired certain oil and natural gas properties and
related assets in the Mid-Continent and east Texas regions in
August 2009. Encore acquired certain oil and natural gas
properties and related assets in the Big Horn and Williston
Basins in March 2007 and April 2007, respectively. Encore also
acquired Crusader Energy Corporation in October 2005 and Cortez
Oil & Gas, Inc. in April 2004. The operating results
of these acquisitions are included in Encores Consolidated
Statements of Operations from the date of acquisition forward.
Encore disposed of certain oil and natural gas properties and
related assets in the Mid-Continent region in June 2007. The
operating results of this disposition are included in
Encores Consolidated Statements of Operations through the
date of disposition. |
|
(b) |
|
Encores historical financial information has been recast
for the adoption of new guidance on the accounting for
noncontrolling interests issued by the FASB in the
Consolidations topic of the FASC and new guidance on
the accounting for the treatment of equity-based payment
transactions in the calculation of earnings per share issued by
the FASB in the Earnings per Share topic of the FASC
on January 1, 2009. The retrospective application of the
new guidance on noncontrolling interests resulted in the
reclassification of approximately $169.1 million,
$122.5 million and $125.2 million from minority
interest in consolidated partnership to noncontrolling interest
at December 31, 2008 and 2007 and September 30, 2008,
respectively. The retrospective application of the new guidance
on earnings per share reduced Encores basic earnings per
common share by $0.14, $0.03, $0.02, and $0.01 for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively,
reduced Encores diluted earnings per share by $0.06,
$0.01, $0.01, $0.02 and $0.01 for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, and 2004,
respectively, and reduced Encores basic and diluted
earnings per share by $0.07 and $0.03, respectively, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008. The adoption of the
revised guidance on earnings per share did not have an impact on
Encores basic earnings per share during the year ended
December 31, 2007. See Encores Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed January 25, 2010. |
|
(c) |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
Encore reduced oil and natural gas revenues for net profits
interests owned by others by $21.5 million and
$50.7 million, respectively. For 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and
2004, Encore reduced oil and natural gas revenues for net
profits interests owned by others by $56.5 million,
$32.5 million, $23.4 million, $21.2 million and
$12.6 million, respectively. |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
In 2006, Encore began purchasing third-party oil barrels from a
counterparty other than a party to whom the barrels were sold
for aggregation and sale with Encores own equity
production in various markets. These purchases assisted Encore
in marketing Encores production by decreasing
Encores dependence on individual markets. These activities
allowed Encore to aggregate larger volumes, facilitated
Encores efforts to maximize the prices Encore received for
production, provided for a greater allocation of future pipeline
capacity in the event of curtailments, and enabled Encore to
reach other markets. In 2007, Encore discontinued purchasing oil
from third party companies as market conditions changed and
pipeline space was gained. Implementing this change allowed
Encore to focus on the marketing of Encores own oil
production, leveraging newly gained pipeline space and
delivering oil to various newly developed markets in an effort
to maximize the value of the oil at the wellhead. In March 2007,
Encore Energy Partners |
20
|
|
|
|
|
LP (or ENP) acquired a natural gas pipeline as part of the Big
Horn Basin asset acquisition. Natural gas volumes are purchased
from numerous gas producers at the inlet to the pipeline and
resold downstream to various local and off-system markets. |
|
|
|
(e) |
|
On January 1, 2006, Encore adopted new guidance issued by
the FASB in the Compensation-Stock Compensation
topic of the FASC. Due to the adoption, non-cash equity-based
compensation expense for 2005 and 2004 has been reclassified to
allocate the amount to the same respective income statement
lines as the respective employees cash compensation. This
resulted in increases in lease operating expense of
$1.3 million and $0.7 million during 2005 and 2004,
respectively, and increases in general and administrative
expense of $2.6 million and $1.1 million during 2005
and 2004, respectively. |
|
(f) |
|
During 2008, circumstances indicated that the carrying amounts
of certain oil and natural gas properties, primarily four wells
in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale, may not be recoverable. Encore
compared the assets carrying amounts to the undiscounted
expected future net cash flows, which indicated a need for an
impairment charge. Encore then compared the net carrying amounts
of the impaired assets to their estimated fair value, which
resulted in a pretax write-down of the value of proved oil and
natural gas properties of $59.5 million. Fair value was
determined using estimates of future production volumes and
estimates of future prices Encore might receive for these
volumes, discounted to a present value. |
|
|
|
(g) |
|
During July 2006, Encore elected to discontinue hedge accounting
prospectively for all of Encores commodity derivative
contracts, which were previously accounted for as hedges. From
that point forward,
mark-to-market
gains or losses on commodity derivative contracts are recorded
in Derivative fair value loss (gain) while in
periods prior to that point, only the ineffective portions of
commodity derivative contracts which were designated as hedges
were recorded in Derivative fair value loss (gain). |
|
|
|
(h) |
|
In 2005, Encore recorded a $19.5 million loss on early
redemption of debt related to the redemption premium and the
expensing of unamortized debt issuance costs of Encores
83/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2012. Encore redeemed all
$150 million of such notes with proceeds received from the
issuance of $300 million of Encores 6.0% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2015. |
|
(i) |
|
Adjusted for the effects of Encores
3-for-2
stock split in July 2005. |
21
Summary
Historical Oil and Natural Gas Reserves, Production Information
and Other Data
The following tables set forth certain historical information
with respect to Denburys and Encores oil and natural
gas reserves, production and other data. The following
information should be read in conjunction with the information
contained in the financial statements and notes thereto
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
Denbury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Summary Oil and Natural Gas Reserves Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated net proved reserves (at end of period prices):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (MBbls)
|
|
|
179,126
|
|
|
|
134,978
|
|
|
|
126,185
|
|
|
|
106,173
|
|
|
|
101,287
|
|
Natural gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
427,955
|
|
|
|
358,608
|
|
|
|
288,826
|
|
|
|
278,367
|
|
|
|
168,484
|
|
Oil equivalent (MBOE)
|
|
|
250,452
|
|
|
|
194,746
|
|
|
|
174,322
|
|
|
|
152,568
|
|
|
|
129,369
|
|
Carbon dioxide (MMcf)(a)
|
|
|
5,612,167
|
|
|
|
5,641,054
|
|
|
|
5,525,948
|
|
|
|
4,645,702
|
|
|
|
2,664,633
|
|
Percentage of total MBOE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved producing
|
|
|
47%
|
|
|
|
56%
|
|
|
|
48%
|
|
|
|
40%
|
|
|
|
39%
|
|
Proved non-producing
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
|
13%
|
|
|
|
17%
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
Proved undeveloped
|
|
|
42%
|
|
|
|
31%
|
|
|
|
35%
|
|
|
|
44%
|
|
|
|
45%
|
|
Representative oil and natural gas prices(b):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil NYMEX
|
|
$
|
44.60
|
|
|
$
|
95.98
|
|
|
$
|
61.05
|
|
|
$
|
61.04
|
|
|
$
|
43.45
|
|
Natural gas Henry Hub
|
|
|
5.71
|
|
|
|
6.80
|
|
|
|
5.63
|
|
|
|
10.08
|
|
|
|
6.18
|
|
Present Values (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted estimated future net cash flow before income taxes
(PV-10
Value)(c)
|
|
$
|
1,926,855
|
|
|
$
|
5,385,123
|
|
|
$
|
2,695,199
|
|
|
$
|
3,215,478
|
|
|
$
|
1,643,289
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flow after
income taxes(d)
|
|
|
1,415,498
|
|
|
|
3,539,617
|
|
|
|
1,837,341
|
|
|
|
2,084,449
|
|
|
|
1,129,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Summary Operating Data(e):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production (average daily):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (Bbls)
|
|
|
36,819
|
|
|
|
30,859
|
|
|
|
31,436
|
|
|
|
27,925
|
|
|
|
22,936
|
|
|
|
20,013
|
|
|
|
19,247
|
|
Natural gas (Mcf)
|
|
|
75,523
|
|
|
|
89,087
|
|
|
|
89,442
|
|
|
|
97,141
|
|
|
|
83,075
|
|
|
|
58,696
|
|
|
|
82,224
|
|
BOE (6:1)
|
|
|
49,406
|
|
|
|
45,707
|
|
|
|
46,343
|
|
|
|
44,115
|
|
|
|
36,782
|
|
|
|
29,795
|
|
|
|
32,951
|
|
Unit Sales Price (excluding impact of derivative
settlements):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (per Bbl)
|
|
$
|
52.68
|
|
|
$
|
106.37
|
|
|
$
|
92.73
|
|
|
$
|
69.80
|
|
|
$
|
59.87
|
|
|
$
|
50.30
|
|
|
$
|
36.46
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf)
|
|
|
3.46
|
|
|
|
9.39
|
|
|
|
8.56
|
|
|
|
6.81
|
|
|
|
7.10
|
|
|
|
8.48
|
|
|
|
6.24
|
|
Unit Sales Price (including impact of derivative
settlements):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (per Bbl)
|
|
$
|
67.25
|
|
|
$
|
102.74
|
|
|
$
|
90.04
|
|
|
$
|
68.84
|
|
|
$
|
59.23
|
|
|
$
|
50.30
|
|
|
$
|
27.36
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf)
|
|
|
3.46
|
|
|
|
8.16
|
|
|
|
7.74
|
|
|
|
7.66
|
|
|
|
7.10
|
|
|
|
7.70
|
|
|
|
5.57
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Costs per BOE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating
|
|
$
|
17.94
|
|
|
$
|
18.22
|
|
|
$
|
18.13
|
|
|
$
|
14.34
|
|
|
$
|
12.46
|
|
|
$
|
9.98
|
|
|
$
|
7.22
|
|
Production taxes and marketing expenses
|
|
|
2.26
|
|
|
|
4.52
|
|
|
|
3.76
|
|
|
|
3.05
|
|
|
|
2.71
|
|
|
|
2.54
|
|
|
|
1.55
|
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
13.13
|
|
|
|
12.85
|
|
|
|
13.08
|
|
|
|
12.17
|
|
|
|
11.11
|
|
|
|
9.09
|
|
|
|
8.09
|
|
General and administrative(f)
|
|
|
5.92
|
|
|
|
3.66
|
|
|
|
3.56
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
3.20
|
|
|
|
2.62
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
|
Abandon acquisition cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Writedown of oil and natural gas properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs Incurred (in thousands)(g):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
$
|
247,060
|
|
|
$
|
5,094
|
|
|
$
|
32,781
|
|
|
$
|
15,531
|
|
|
$
|
147,655
|
|
|
$
|
64,791
|
|
|
$
|
23,977
|
|
Unevaluated
|
|
|
8,626
|
|
|
|
12,439
|
|
|
|
16,129
|
|
|
|
60,079
|
|
|
|
205,506
|
|
|
|
32,874
|
|
|
|
3,459
|
|
Development
|
|
|
249,843
|
|
|
|
421,764
|
|
|
|
575,947
|
|
|
|
553,315
|
|
|
|
443,866
|
|
|
|
240,478
|
|
|
|
129,819
|
|
Exploration
|
|
|
2,606
|
|
|
|
5,037
|
|
|
|
5,710
|
|
|
|
42,726
|
|
|
|
43,564
|
|
|
|
45,652
|
|
|
|
23,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs incurred
|
|
$
|
508,135
|
|
|
$
|
444,334
|
|
|
$
|
630,567
|
|
|
$
|
671,651
|
|
|
$
|
840,591
|
|
|
$
|
383,795
|
|
|
$
|
181,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Based on gross working interest basis and includes reserves
dedicated to volumetric production payments of 153.8 Bcf,
182.3 Bcf, 210.5 Bcf, 237.1 Bcf and
178.7 Bcf at December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
Oil reference prices as of each respective period end were based
on NYMEX WTI oil prices per barrel and natural gas reference
prices as of each respective period end were based on Henry Hub
cash prices per MMBtu, with these representative prices adjusted
for differentials by field to arrive at the appropriate net
price Denbury receives. |
|
(c) |
|
PV-10 Value
is a non-GAAP measure and is different from the Standardized
Measure in that
PV-10 Value
is a pre-tax number and the Standardized Measure is an after-tax
number. The information used to calculate
PV-10 Value
is derived directly from data determined in accordance with the
FASC Extractive Industries Oil and Gas
topic. Denbury believes that
PV-10 Value
is a useful supplemental disclosure to the Standardized Measure
because the Standardized Measure can be impacted by a
companys unique tax situation, and it is not practical to
calculate the Standardized Measure on a property by property
basis. Because of this,
PV-10 Value
is a widely used measure within the industry and is commonly
used by securities analysts, banks and credit rating agencies to
evaluate the estimated future net cash flows from proved
reserves on a comparative basis across companies or specific
properties.
PV-10 Value
is commonly used by Denbury and others in the industry to
evaluate properties that are bought and sold and to assess the
potential return on investment in these oil and gas properties.
PV-10 Value
is not a measure of financial or operating performance under
GAAP, nor should it be considered in isolation or as a
substitute for the Standardized Measure. The
PV-10 Value
and the Standardized Measure do not purport to represent the
fair value of the oil and natural gas reserves. |
|
(d) |
|
Determined in accordance with the guidelines of the FASC
Extractive Industries Oil and Gas topic. |
|
(e) |
|
In June 2009, Denbury sold 60% of its interest in its Barnett
Shale natural gas assets. |
|
(f) |
|
The increase in general and administrative expense during the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to prior
periods is primarily due to higher employee costs, expense
related to a compensation arrangement with certain members of
Genesis Energy L.P. management and a compensation charge related
to retirement of Denburys CEO and President on
June 30, 2009. |
|
(g) |
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
Denbury spent $523.4 million and $236.4 million,
respectively, on capital expenditures relating to
CO2
properties, equipment and pipelines |
23
|
|
|
|
|
which is not included in total cost incurred. During 2008, 2007,
2006, 2005 and 2004, Denbury spent $462.9 million,
$171.2 million, $63.6 million, $78.7 million and
$50.3 million, respectively, on capital expenditures
relating to
CO2
properties, equipment and pipelines which is not included in
total costs incurred. |
Encore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,(a)
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Summary Oil and Natural Gas Reserves Data(b):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated net proved reserves (at end of period prices):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (MBbls)
|
|
|
134,452
|
|
|
|
188,587
|
|
|
|
153,434
|
|
|
|
148,387
|
|
|
|
134,048
|
|
Natural gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
307,520
|
|
|
|
256,447
|
|
|
|
306,764
|
|
|
|
283,865
|
|
|
|
234,030
|
|
Oil equivalent (MBOE)
|
|
|
185,705
|
|
|
|
231,328
|
|
|
|
204,561
|
|
|
|
195,698
|
|
|
|
173,053
|
|
Percentage of total MBOE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved producing
|
|
|
77%
|
|
|
|
66%
|
|
|
|
63%
|
|
|
|
70%
|
|
|
|
69%
|
|
Proved non-producing
|
|
|
3%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
Proved undeveloped
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
32%
|
|
|
|
35%
|
|
|
|
28%
|
|
|
|
29%
|
|
Representative oil and natural gas prices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
$
|
44.60
|
|
|
$
|
96.01
|
|
|
$
|
61.06
|
|
|
$
|
61.04
|
|
|
$
|
43.46
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
7.47
|
|
|
|
5.48
|
|
|
|
9.44
|
|
|
|
6.19
|
|
Present Values (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted estimated future net cash flow before income taxes
(PV-10
Value)(c)
|
|
$
|
1,399,330
|
|
|
$
|
4,462,452
|
|
|
$
|
1,959,388
|
|
|
$
|
2,664,549
|
|
|
$
|
1,617,869
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows after
income taxes(d)
|
|
|
1,219,954
|
|
|
|
3,291,709
|
|
|
|
1,461,807
|
|
|
|
1,918,471
|
|
|
|
1,165,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,(a)
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,(a)
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Summary Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production (average daily):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (Bbls)
|
|
|
27,281
|
|
|
|
27,174
|
|
|
|
27,459
|
|
|
|
26,152
|
|
|
|
20,096
|
|
|
|
18,826
|
|
|
|
18,249
|
|
Natural gas (Mcf)
|
|
|
89,405
|
|
|
|
69,031
|
|
|
|
72,060
|
|
|
|
65,651
|
|
|
|
64,262
|
|
|
|
57,696
|
|
|
|
38,493
|
|
BOE (6:1)
|
|
|
42,182
|
|
|
|
38,679
|
|
|
|
39,470
|
|
|
|
37,094
|
|
|
|
30,807
|
|
|
|
28,442
|
|
|
|
24,665
|
|
Average Realized Prices (excluding the impact of derivative
settlements)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil ($/Bbl)
|
|
$
|
50.34
|
|
|
$
|
104.61
|
|
|
$
|
89.58
|
|
|
$
|
63.50
|
|
|
$
|
54.42
|
|
|
$
|
51.06
|
|
|
$
|
38.24
|
|
Natural gas ($/Mcf)
|
|
|
3.56
|
|
|
|
9.67
|
|
|
|
8.63
|
|
|
|
6.69
|
|
|
|
6.59
|
|
|
|
7.87
|
|
|
|
5.76
|
|
Average Realized Prices (including the impact of derivative
settlements)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil ($/Bbl)
|
|
$
|
50.34
|
|
|
$
|
104.23
|
|
|
$
|
89.30
|
|
|
$
|
58.96
|
|
|
$
|
47.30
|
|
|
$
|
44.82
|
|
|
$
|
33.04
|
|
Natural gas ($/Mcf)
|
|
|
3.56
|
|
|
|
9.67
|
|
|
|
8.63
|
|
|
|
6.26
|
|
|
|
6.24
|
|
|
|
7.09
|
|
|
|
5.53
|
|
Average Costs per BOE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating(e)
|
|
$
|
10.67
|
|
|
$
|
12.27
|
|
|
$
|
12.12
|
|
|
$
|
10.59
|
|
|
$
|
8.73
|
|
|
$
|
6.72
|
|
|
$
|
5.30
|
|
Production, ad valorem and severance taxes
|
|
|
4.17
|
|
|
|
9.04
|
|
|
|
7.66
|
|
|
|
5.51
|
|
|
|
4.43
|
|
|
|
4.39
|
|
|
|
3.36
|
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
18.88
|
|
|
|
15.01
|
|
|
|
15.80
|
|
|
|
13.59
|
|
|
|
10.09
|
|
|
|
8.25
|
|
|
|
5.38
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.48
|
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration
|
|
|
3.80
|
|
|
|
2.87
|
|
|
|
2.71
|
|
|
|
2.05
|
|
|
|
2.71
|
|
|
|
1.39
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
General and administrative(e)
|
|
|
3.54
|
|
|
|
3.45
|
|
|
|
3.35
|
|
|
|
2.89
|
|
|
|
2.06
|
|
|
|
1.67
|
|
|
|
1.33
|
|
Marketing, net of revenues(g)
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,(a)
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,(a)
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Cost Incurred (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved properties
|
|
$
|
397,974
|
|
|
$
|
29,304
|
|
|
$
|
28,840
|
|
|
$
|
796,239
|
|
|
$
|
5,271
|
|
|
$
|
226,690
|
|
|
$
|
206,072
|
|
Unproved properties
|
|
|
6,004
|
|
|
|
95,916
|
|
|
|
128,635
|
|
|
|
52,306
|
|
|
|
24,462
|
|
|
|
21,205
|
|
|
|
33,926
|
|
Development:
|
|
|
95,217
|
|
|
|
250,911
|
|
|
|
362,609
|
|
|
|
270,161
|
|
|
|
253,631
|
|
|
|
269,474
|
|
|
|
157,559
|
|
Exploration:
|
|
|
140,138
|
|
|
|
179,217
|
|
|
|
256,437
|
|
|
|
97,453
|
|
|
|
95,205
|
|
|
|
57,046
|
|
|
|
30,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs incurred
|
|
$
|
639,333
|
|
|
$
|
555,348
|
|
|
$
|
776,521
|
|
|
$
|
1,216,159
|
|
|
$
|
378,569
|
|
|
$
|
574,415
|
|
|
$
|
428,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Encore acquired certain oil and natural gas properties and
related assets in the Mid-Continent and East Texas regions in
August 2009. Encore acquired certain oil and natural gas
properties and related assets in the Big Horn and Williston
Basins in March 2007 and April 2007, respectively. Encore also
acquired Crusader Energy Corporation in October 2005 and Cortez
Oil & Gas, Inc. in April 2004. The operating results
of these acquisitions are included in Encores Consolidated
Statements of Operations from the date of acquisition forward.
Encore disposed of certain oil and natural gas properties and
related assets in the Mid-Continent region in June 2007. The
operating results of this disposition are included in
Encores Consolidated Statements of Operations through the
date of disposition. |
|
(b) |
|
Information not available for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008. |
|
(c) |
|
PV-10 Value
is a non-GAAP measure and is different from the Standardized
Measure in that
PV-10 Value
is a pre-tax number and the Standardized Measure is an after-tax
number. The information used to calculate
PV-10 Value
is derived directly from data determined in accordance with the
FASC Extractive Industries Oil and Gas
topic. Encore believes that
PV-10 Value
is a useful supplemental disclosure to the Standardized Measure
because the Standardized Measure can be impacted by a
companys unique tax situation, and it is not practical to
calculate the Standardized Measure on a property by property
basis. Because of this,
PV-10 Value
is a widely used measure within the industry and is commonly
used by securities analysts, banks and credit rating agencies to
evaluate the estimated future net cash flows from proved
reserves on a comparative basis across companies or specific
properties.
PV-10 Value
is commonly used by Encore and others in the industry to
evaluate properties that are bought and sold and to assess the
potential return on investment in these oil and gas properties.
PV-10 Value
is not a measure of financial or operating performance under
GAAP, nor should it be considered in isolation or as a
substitute for the Standardized Measure. The
PV-10 Value
and the Standardized Measure do not purport to represent the
fair value of the oil and natural gas reserves. |
|
(d) |
|
Determined in accordance with the guidelines of the FASC
Extractive Industries Oil and Gas topic. |
|
(e) |
|
On January 1, 2006, Encore adopted new guidance issued by
the FASB in the Compensation-Stock Compensation
topic of the FASC. Due to the adoption of the new guidance,
non-cash equity-based compensation expense for 2005 and 2004 has
been reclassified to allocate the amount to the same respective
income statement lines as the respective employees cash
compensation. This resulted in increases in lease operating
expense of $0.13 per BOE and $0.07 per BOE during 2005 and 2004,
respectively, and increases in general and administrative
expense of $0.25 per BOE and $0.12 per BOE during 2005 and 2004,
respectively. |
|
(f) |
|
During 2008, circumstances indicated that the carrying amounts
of certain oil and natural gas properties, primarily four wells
in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale, may not be recoverable. Encore
compared the assets carrying amounts to the undiscounted
expected future net cash flows, which indicated a need for an
impairment charge. Encore then compared the net carrying amounts
of the impaired assets to their estimated fair value, which
resulted in a pretax write-down of the value of proved oil and
natural gas properties of $59.5 million. Fair value was
determined using estimates of future production volumes and
estimates of future prices Encore might receive for these
volumes, discounted to a present value. |
25
|
|
|
(g) |
|
In 2006, Encore began purchasing third-party oil barrels from a
counterparty other than a party to whom the barrels were sold
for aggregation and sale with Encores own equity
production in various markets. These purchases assisted Encore
in marketing Encores production by decreasing
Encores dependence on individual markets. These activities
allowed Encore to aggregate larger volumes, facilitated
Encores efforts to maximize the prices Encore received for
production, provided for a greater allocation of future pipeline
capacity in the event of curtailments, and enabled Encore to
reach other markets. In 2007, Encore discontinued purchasing oil
from third party companies as market conditions changed and
pipeline space was gained. Implementing this change allowed
Encore to focus on the marketing of Encores own oil
production, leveraging newly gained pipeline space and
delivering oil to various newly developed markets in an effort
to maximize the value of the oil at the wellhead. In March 2007,
ENP acquired a natural gas pipeline as part of the Big Horn
Basin asset acquisition. Natural gas volumes are purchased from
numerous gas producers at the inlet to the pipeline and resold
downstream to various local and off-system markets. |
26
Summary
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information
The following summary unaudited pro forma combined financial
information is compressed for illustrative purposes, does not
include the pro forma adjustment columns and corresponding notes
contained in the full unaudited pro forma combined financial
information beginning on
page F-1
of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and the amounts shown
under Denbury Pro Forma Combined for any particular
line item are not intended to be additive of the amounts for
that line item shown under Denbury Pro Forma and
Encore Historical. The following tables set forth:
|
|
|
|
|
Denburys selected consolidated historical financial
information that has been derived from Denburys unaudited
consolidated statement of operations and balance sheet as of and
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
Denburys consolidated statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2008;
|
|
|
|
Denburys pro forma unaudited condensed consolidated
financial information to give effect to the sale of its Barnett
Shale natural gas assets. Denburys pro forma unaudited
condensed consolidated balance sheet gives effect to the sale of
Denburys remaining 40% interest in its Barnett Shale
natural gas assets as if it occurred September 30, 2009.
Denburys pro forma unaudited condensed consolidated
statements of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and the year ended December 31,
2008 give effect to the sale of 60%, and subsequent sale of 40%,
of its Barnett Shale natural gas assets as if each occurred on
January 1, 2008;
|
|
|
|
Encores selected consolidated historical financial
information that has been derived from Encores unaudited
consolidated statement of operations and balance sheet as of and
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
Encores consolidated statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2008; and
|
|
|
|
Denburys pro forma combined financial information to give
effect to the merger and related financing transactions. The
unaudited pro forma combined statements of operations data
assume the merger and related financing transactions occurred on
January 1, 2008 and the unaudited pro forma combined
balance sheet data assumes the merger and related financing
transactions occurred on September 30, 2009.
|
This unaudited pro forma combined financial data is not
necessarily indicative of the results of operations or the
financial position that would have occurred had the merger been
consummated on the assumed dates nor is it necessarily
indicative of future results of operations or financial
position. The pro forma combined financial data should be read
together with Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the
historical financial statements and related notes of Denbury and
Encore incorporated by reference in this document and the pro
forma combined financial information provided in the section
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information
beginning on
page F-1
of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
27
Unaudited
Pro Forma Combined
Statement of Operations for the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
Encore
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues and other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil, natural gas and related product sales
|
|
$
|
600,942
|
|
|
$
|
538,112
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
999,935
|
|
CO2
sales and transportation fees
|
|
|
9,708
|
|
|
|
9,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,708
|
|
Interest income and other
|
|
|
1,948
|
|
|
|
1,948
|
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
5,863
|
|
Oil revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
374,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
612,598
|
|
|
|
549,768
|
|
|
|
465,642
|
|
|
|
1,015,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
|
241,908
|
|
|
|
228,141
|
|
|
|
122,817
|
|
|
|
366,578
|
|
Production taxes and marketing expenses
|
|
|
24,294
|
|
|
|
19,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,651
|
|
Transportation expense Genesis
|
|
|
6,143
|
|
|
|
6,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,143
|
|
CO2
operating expenses
|
|
|
3,442
|
|
|
|
3,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,442
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
79,828
|
|
|
|
79,828
|
|
|
|
40,743
|
|
|
|
116,806
|
|
Interest, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
36,960
|
|
|
|
34,095
|
|
|
|
57,009
|
|
|
|
139,690
|
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
177,145
|
|
|
|
163,275
|
|
|
|
217,361
|
|
|
|
370,145
|
|
Commodity derivative expense (income)
|
|
|
177,061
|
|
|
|
177,061
|
|
|
|
(741
|
)
|
|
|
176,320
|
|
Production, ad valorem, and severance taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
746,781
|
|
|
|
711,931
|
|
|
|
560,095
|
|
|
|
1,251,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net income of Genesis
|
|
|
5,802
|
|
|
|
5,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(128,381
|
)
|
|
|
(156,361
|
)
|
|
|
(94,453
|
)
|
|
|
(230,467
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(49,729
|
)
|
|
|
(60,362
|
)
|
|
|
(25,254
|
)
|
|
|
(77,986
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss
|
|
|
(78,652
|
)
|
|
|
(95,999
|
)
|
|
|
(69,199
|
)
|
|
|
(152,481
|
)
|
Loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,669
|
)
|
|
|
(10,776
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to stockholders
|
|
$
|
(78,652
|
)
|
|
$
|
(95,999
|
)
|
|
$
|
(59,530
|
)
|
|
$
|
(141,705
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share basic
|
|
$
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
Net loss per common share diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
246,156
|
|
|
|
246,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370,136
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
246,156
|
|
|
|
246,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370,136
|
|
28
Unaudited
Pro Forma Combined
Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
Encore
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues and other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil, natural gas and related product sales
|
|
$
|
1,347,010
|
|
|
$
|
1,112,149
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,237,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CO2
sales and transportation fees
|
|
|
13,858
|
|
|
|
13,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and other
|
|
|
4,834
|
|
|
|
4,834
|
|
|
|
3,898
|
|
|
|
19,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
897,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
1,365,702
|
|
|
|
1,130,841
|
|
|
|
1,139,316
|
|
|
|
2,270,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense
|
|
|
307,550
|
|
|
|
283,509
|
|
|
|
175,115
|
|
|
|
472,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production taxes and marketing expenses
|
|
|
55,770
|
|
|
|
43,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation expense Genesis
|
|
|
7,982
|
|
|
|
7,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CO2
operating expenses
|
|
|
4,216
|
|
|
|
4,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
60,374
|
|
|
|
60,374
|
|
|
|
48,421
|
|
|
|
105,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
32,596
|
|
|
|
29,003
|
|
|
|
73,173
|
|
|
|
157,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
221,792
|
|
|
|
177,540
|
|
|
|
228,252
|
|
|
|
403,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative income
|
|
|
(200,053
|
)
|
|
|
(200,053
|
)
|
|
|
(346,236
|
)
|
|
|
(546,289
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abandoned acquisition cost
|
|
|
30,601
|
|
|
|
30,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceiling test write-down
|
|
|
226,000
|
|
|
|
226,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production, ad valorem, and severance taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,526
|
|
|
|
59,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
746,828
|
|
|
|
662,316
|
|
|
|
412,631
|
|
|
|
1,082,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net income of Genesis
|
|
|
5,354
|
|
|
|
5,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
624,228
|
|
|
|
473,879
|
|
|
|
726,685
|
|
|
|
1,193,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
235,832
|
|
|
|
178,699
|
|
|
|
241,621
|
|
|
|
417,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income
|
|
|
388,396
|
|
|
|
295,180
|
|
|
|
485,064
|
|
|
|
775,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,252
|
|
|
|
50,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to stockholders
|
|
$
|
388,396
|
|
|
$
|
295,180
|
|
|
$
|
430,812
|
|
|
$
|
724,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic
|
|
$
|
1.59
|
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share diluted
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
243,935
|
|
|
|
243,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
367,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
252,530
|
|
|
|
252,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
Unaudited
Pro Forma Combined
Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
Encore
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
21,689
|
|
|
$
|
211,689
|
|
|
$
|
6,683
|
|
|
$
|
218,372
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
192,468
|
|
|
|
192,468
|
|
|
|
206,983
|
|
|
|
399,883
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
3,420,324
|
|
|
|
3,210,324
|
|
|
|
3,278,961
|
|
|
|
7,600,241
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
138,830
|
|
|
|
138,830
|
|
|
|
60,606
|
|
|
|
1,228,168
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
129,949
|
|
|
|
129,949
|
|
|
|
160,581
|
|
|
|
340,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,903,260
|
|
|
$
|
3,883,260
|
|
|
$
|
3,713,814
|
|
|
$
|
9,787,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
357,840
|
|
|
$
|
357,840
|
|
|
$
|
275,607
|
|
|
$
|
569,479
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,196,061
|
|
|
|
1,176,061
|
|
|
|
1,243,496
|
|
|
|
3,501,864
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
99,760
|
|
|
|
99,760
|
|
|
|
94,871
|
|
|
|
179,899
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
458,940
|
|
|
|
458,940
|
|
|
|
431,075
|
|
|
|
1,329,053
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
1,790,659
|
|
|
|
1,790,659
|
|
|
|
1,668,765
|
|
|
|
4,206,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,903,260
|
|
|
$
|
3,883,260
|
|
|
$
|
3,713,814
|
|
|
$
|
9,787,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
Summary
Pro Forma Combined Oil and Natural Gas Reserve Data
The following tables set forth summary pro forma information
with respect to Denburys and Encores pro forma
combined estimated net proved and proved developed oil and
natural gas reserves and the standardized measure of discounted
future net cash flows as of December 31, 2008. This pro
forma information gives effect to the merger as if it occurred
on December 31, 2008. The Denbury and Encore oil and
natural gas reserve data presented below was derived from each
companys 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
which are incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Denburys pro forma reserves data
gives effect to the sale of its Barnett Shale natural gas
reserves as if it occurred prior to December 31, 2008.
Future exploration, exploitation and development expenditures,
as well as future commodity prices and service costs, will
affect the reserve volumes attributable to the acquired
properties and the standardized measure of discounted future net
cash flows.
Estimated
Quantities of Oil and Natural Gas Reserves as of
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
Encore
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Estimated Proved Reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (MBbl)
|
|
|
179,126
|
|
|
|
(20,865
|
)
|
|
|
158,261
|
|
|
|
134,452
|
|
|
|
292,713
|
|
Natural Gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
427,955
|
|
|
|
(332,502
|
)
|
|
|
95,453
|
|
|
|
307,520
|
|
|
|
402,973
|
|
MBOE
|
|
|
250,452
|
|
|
|
(76,282
|
)
|
|
|
174,170
|
|
|
|
185,705
|
|
|
|
359,875
|
|
Estimated Proved Developed Reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (MBbl)
|
|
|
96,746
|
|
|
|
(13,010
|
)
|
|
|
83,736
|
|
|
|
110,014
|
|
|
|
193,750
|
|
Natural Gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
298,114
|
|
|
|
(217,694
|
)
|
|
|
80,420
|
|
|
|
232,715
|
|
|
|
313,135
|
|
MBOE
|
|
|
146,432
|
|
|
|
(49,292
|
)
|
|
|
97,140
|
|
|
|
148,800
|
|
|
|
245,940
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, significant changes in the above
pro forma estimates of oil and gas reserve quantities since
December 31, 2008 were: (1) Denburys acquisition
of the Hastings Field in February 2009 with estimated proved
reserves at that date of approximately 7.7 MMBOE
(approximately 99% oil), net to the acquired interest;
(2) Denburys recording in the second quarter of 2009
of approximately 10.9 MMBOE of estimated incremental proved
oil reserves at Cranfield Field as a result of the oil
production response to the
CO2
injections in that field; and (3) Encores August 2009
acquisition of oil and natural gas properties in the
Mid-Continent and East Texas regions with estimated proved
reserves at that date of approximately 24.6 MMBOE
(approximately 72% natural gas), all of which reserve quantity
estimates were determined utilizing prices and economics
existing at the time of acquisition or determination. The pro
forma December 31, 2008 estimated quantities of reserves
presented in the table above do not include the estimated
reserve quantities for these three acquisitions or determination
made during the first nine months of 2009, nor do they include
reserve quantity estimates for the Conroe Field acquisition by
Denbury in December 2009 (see Denbury The
Combined Company Recent Events).
Standardized
Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows at
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
Encore
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Future cash inflows
|
|
$
|
9,024,224
|
|
|
$
|
(2,005,421
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,018,803
|
|
|
$
|
6,754,431
|
|
|
$
|
13,773,234
|
|
Future production costs
|
|
|
(4,039,898
|
)
|
|
|
622,264
|
|
|
|
(3,417,634
|
)
|
|
|
(3,082,814
|
)
|
|
|
(6,500,448
|
)
|
Future development costs
|
|
|
(944,716
|
)
|
|
|
239,947
|
|
|
|
(704,769
|
)
|
|
|
(593,677
|
)
|
|
|
(1,298,446
|
)
|
Future income tax expense
|
|
|
(1,071,939
|
)
|
|
|
406,915
|
|
|
|
(665,024
|
)
|
|
|
(555,370
|
)
|
|
|
(1,220,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future net cash flows
|
|
|
2,967,671
|
|
|
|
(736,295
|
)
|
|
|
2,231,376
|
|
|
|
2,522,570
|
|
|
|
4,753,946
|
|
Discounted at 10% per year
|
|
|
(1,552,173
|
)
|
|
|
478,380
|
|
|
|
(1,073,793
|
)
|
|
|
(1,302,616
|
)
|
|
|
(2,376,409
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
|
|
$
|
1,415,498
|
|
|
$
|
(257,915
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,157,583
|
|
|
$
|
1,219,954
|
|
|
$
|
2,377,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
Unaudited
Comparative Per Share Data
The following table sets forth (1) the historical net
income (loss) and net book value per share of Denbury common
stock in comparison to the pro forma net income (loss) and net
book value per share after giving effect to the merger as an
acquisition of Encore and (2) the historical net income
(loss) and net book value per share of Encore common stock in
comparison to the equivalent pro forma net income (loss) and net
book value per share attributable to an assumed
2.313 shares of Denbury common stock that will be issued
for each share of Encore common stock, assuming the Denbury
20-day average price is equal to $15.13, the Denbury closing
price on February 3, 2010. Neither Denbury nor Encore has
declared dividends on its common stock since its formation. The
information presented in this table should be read in
conjunction with (1) the pro forma combined financial
information appearing elsewhere herein and (2) the
consolidated historical financial statements of Denbury and
Encore and the notes thereto incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Historical-Denbury:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.59
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
|
1.54
|
|
Cash
dividends(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book Value Per Share-Diluted
|
|
|
6.86
|
|
|
|
7.15
|
|
Historical-Encore:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(1.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
8.10
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(1.15
|
)
|
|
|
8.01
|
|
Cash
dividends(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book Value Per Share-Diluted
|
|
|
32.11
|
|
|
|
28.06
|
|
Pro Forma Combined:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.97
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
|
1.92
|
|
Net Book Value Per Share-Diluted
|
|
|
9.07
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Equivalent Pro
Forma(3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.88
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.56
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(0.88
|
)
|
|
|
4.44
|
|
Net Book Value Per Share-Diluted
|
|
|
20.98
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Denbury is not currently paying dividends on its common stock
and does not anticipate paying cash dividends on its common
stock in the foreseeable future. |
|
(2) |
|
Encore is not currently paying dividends on its common stock and
does not anticipate paying cash dividends on its common stock in
the foreseeable future. |
|
(3) |
|
The Equivalent Pro Forma Net Income (Loss) Per Share represents
pro forma earnings per share that is equated to the respective
earnings per share for one share of Encore common stock. |
Comparative
Per Share Market Price and Dividend Information
Historical
Market Prices of Denbury and Encore
Denburys common stock is listed on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol DNR. Encores common
stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
EAC. The following table sets forth the high and low
trading prices per share of Denbury common stock and Encore
common stock on the New York Stock Exchange for the periods
shown. The trading prices of Denbury common stock are adjusted
to reflect the
2-for-1
split on December 5, 2007. You are urged to obtain current
market quotations before making any decision with respect to the
merger.
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury Common Stock
|
|
|
Encore Common Stock
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
$
|
12.98
|
|
|
$
|
26.50
|
|
|
$
|
21.74
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
19.38
|
|
|
|
14.84
|
|
|
|
29.96
|
|
|
|
24.21
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
23.38
|
|
|
|
18.28
|
|
|
|
33.00
|
|
|
|
25.79
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
30.56
|
|
|
|
22.41
|
|
|
|
38.55
|
|
|
|
30.59
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
33.64
|
|
|
|
21.76
|
|
|
|
40.74
|
|
|
|
26.10
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
40.32
|
|
|
|
27.28
|
|
|
|
77.35
|
|
|
|
38.45
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
37.24
|
|
|
|
16.11
|
|
|
|
79.62
|
|
|
|
36.84
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
18.86
|
|
|
|
5.59
|
|
|
|
41.05
|
|
|
|
17.89
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
17.52
|
|
|
|
9.61
|
|
|
|
32.11
|
|
|
|
17.04
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
18.84
|
|
|
|
13.39
|
|
|
|
39.01
|
|
|
|
22.30
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
17.78
|
|
|
|
12.45
|
|
|
|
39.93
|
|
|
|
25.53
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
17.39
|
|
|
|
12.51
|
|
|
|
49.00
|
|
|
|
35.64
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (through February 3, 2010)
|
|
|
17.07
|
|
|
|
13.51
|
|
|
|
50.86
|
|
|
|
47.60
|
|
The following table sets forth the closing sale prices of
Denburys common stock and Encores common stock as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange on
(i) October 30, 2009, the last full trading day before
the public announcement of the proposed merger, and
(ii) February 3, 2010, the last practicable trading
day prior to mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The table also includes the equivalent value of the merger
consideration per share of Encore common stock on
October 30, 2009 and February 3, 2010. The cash
equivalent prices per share for each date were calculated by
multiplying the closing price of Denburys common stock on
those dates by 2.3973 and 2.313, respectively, which is the
total Denbury common stock consideration that would be issued
pursuant to the merger agreement per share of Encore common
stock if the Denbury 20-day average price is equal to those
closing prices shown below. To this, we added $15.00 per share,
which is the total cash consideration to be paid pursuant to the
merger agreement per share of Encore common stock. In each case,
these amounts were calculated assuming that each Encore
stockholder elected to receive a mix of $15.00 in cash and
$35.00 in Denbury common stock for each Encore share and giving
effect to the exchange ratio collar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
Encore
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
|
Closing Price
|
|
|
Closing Price
|
|
|
per Share Value
|
|
|
October 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
14.60
|
|
|
$
|
37.07
|
|
|
$
|
50.00
|
|
February 3, 2010
|
|
$
|
15.13
|
|
|
$
|
49.23
|
|
|
$
|
50.00
|
|
As of February 3, 2010, there were approximately 1,341
record holders of Denbury common stock and approximately 418
record holders of Encore common stock.
No
History of Dividends and No Dividends Expected in the
Foreseeable Future
Denbury is not currently paying dividends on its common stock.
Denburys revolving credit facilities and indentures
restrict its ability to pay cash dividends. After the merger,
Denbury intends to retain its earnings to finance the expansion
of its business, repay indebtedness and for general corporate
purposes. Therefore, Denbury does not anticipate paying cash
dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable future.
Following the merger, Denburys board of directors will
have the authority to declare and pay dividends on its common
stock in the board of directors discretion, as long as
Denbury has funds legally available to do so. Upon consummation
of the merger, Denburys newly committed financing and its
indentures will continue to restrict Denburys ability to
pay cash dividends.
33
RISK
FACTORS
You should consider carefully the following risk factors,
together with all of the other information included in, or
incorporated by reference into, this document before deciding
how to vote. This document also contains forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please read
Cautionary Statements Concerning Forward-Looking
Statements on page 40.
Risks
Relating to the Merger
We may
not realize the benefits of integrating our
companies.
To be successful after the merger, Denbury will need to combine
and integrate the operations of Denbury and Encore into one
company. Integration will require substantial management
attention and could detract attention from the
day-to-day
business of the combined company. Denbury could encounter
difficulties in the integration process, such as the need to
revisit assumptions about reserves, future production, revenues,
capital expenditures and operating costs, including synergies,
the loss of key employees or commercial relationships or the
need to address unanticipated liabilities. If Denbury cannot
integrate the Denbury and Encore businesses successfully, it may
fail to realize the expected benefits of the merger.
Encores
directors and executive officers have interests in the merger
that may be different from, and in addition to, the interests of
other Encore stockholders.
Encores directors and executive officers are parties to
agreements or participants in other arrangements that give them
interests in the merger that may be different from, or in
addition to, your interests as a stockholder of Encore, which
could create conflicts of interest in their determinations to
recommend the merger. You should consider these interests in
voting on the merger. We have described these different
interests under The Merger Interests of
Certain Persons in the Merger that May be Different from Your
Interests.
Encore
stockholders electing to receive only cash or only Denbury
common stock may receive a form or combination of consideration
different from the form they elect.
While each Encore stockholder may elect to receive consideration
consisting of cash, shares of Denbury common stock or a
combination of both in exchange for their shares of Encore
common stock, the aggregate cash consideration to be received by
Encore stockholders pursuant to the merger will be fixed at an
amount equal to the product of $15.00 and the number of issued
and outstanding shares of Encore common stock immediately prior
to closing of the merger (excluding certain shares), which cash
amount is expected to be approximately $830 million.
Accordingly, if Encore stockholders elect, in the aggregate, to
receive cash in an amount greater than the aggregate cash
consideration payable under the merger agreement, or less than
the aggregate cash consideration payable under the merger
agreement, then those holders electing to receive either all
cash or all stock consideration, as the case may be, will be pro
rated down and will receive the undersubscribed form of merger
consideration as a portion of the overall consideration they
receive for their shares. As a result, depending on the
elections made by other Encore stockholders, if an Encore
stockholder elects to receive all cash pursuant to the merger,
that stockholder could receive a portion of the merger
consideration in Denbury common stock instead of cash, or, if an
Encore stockholder elects to receive all Denbury common stock
pursuant to the merger, that stockholder could receive a portion
of the merger consideration in cash instead of Denbury common
stock.
As a
result of the consideration election and collar provisions of
the merger agreement, and because the market price of Denbury
common stock will fluctuate, Encore stockholders cannot be sure
of the aggregate value of the merger consideration they will
receive.
Subject to proration, under the merger agreement, Encore
stockholders may elect to receive consideration consisting of
cash, shares of Denbury common stock or a combination of both in
exchange for their shares of Encore common stock, and Encore
stockholders electing to receive a mix of cash and stock
consideration and non-electing stockholders will receive $15.00
in cash and between 2.0698 and 2.6336 shares of Denbury
common stock in exchange for each Encore share. Subject to
proration, Encore stockholders electing to receive
34
all cash will receive $50.00 per Encore share and Encore
stockholders electing to receive only Denbury common stock will
receive between 2.9568 and 3.7622 shares of Denbury common
stock in exchange for each Encore share.
The actual number of shares of Denbury common stock to be issued
to Encore stockholders receiving all stock or a mix of cash and
stock consideration will be determined under a collar mechanism
based upon the Denbury
20-day
average price. Under this collar mechanism, the exchange ratio
for the stock portion of the merger consideration becomes fixed
if the Denbury
20-day
average price is between the $13.29 and $16.91 collar range.
Consequently, Encore stockholders receiving consideration
consisting wholly or partially of Denbury common stock will
receive less consideration per share, based on such average
price, than those Encore stockholders who receive only cash
consideration if the Denbury
20-day
average price is below $13.29 per share, and will receive more
consideration per share, based on such average price, than those
Encore stockholders who receive only cash consideration if the
Denbury
20-day
average price is above $16.91 per share.
In addition, the Denbury
20-day
average price will likely vary from the market price of Denbury
common stock on the date the merger agreement was announced, on
the date that this joint proxy statement/prospectus is mailed to
Encore stockholders, on the date an Encore stockholder makes an
election with respect to the merger consideration, on the date
of the special meeting of Encore stockholders and on the date an
Encore stockholder receives the merger consideration. Therefore,
even if the
Denbury 20-day
average price is between $13.29 per share and
$16.91 per share, the consideration received by Encore
stockholders receiving consideration that includes Denbury
common stock may have a current value that is higher or lower
than $50.00 per Encore share on the date the consideration
is received, as calculated based on Denbury common stock trading
prices prevailing at that time.
If you
tender shares of Encore common stock to make an election, you
will not be able to sell those shares unless you revoke your
election prior to the election deadline.
If you are an Encore stockholder and want to make a cash or
stock election, you must deliver your stock certificates (or
follow the procedures for guaranteed delivery) and a properly
completed and signed election form to the exchange agent. The
deadline for doing this is 5:00 p.m., New York time, on
March 2, 2010. You will not be able to sell any shares of
Encore common stock that you have delivered unless you revoke
your election before the deadline by providing written notice to
the exchange agent. If you do not revoke your election, you will
not be able to liquidate your investment in Encore common stock
for any reason until you receive cash or Denbury common stock
pursuant to the merger. In the time between delivery of your
shares and the closing of the merger, the market price of Encore
or Denbury common stock may increase or decrease and you might
otherwise want to sell your shares of Encore to gain access to
cash, make other investments or reduce the potential for a
decrease in the value of your investment.
Denbury
may be unable to obtain the financing necessary to consummate
the merger.
Denbury has received a financing commitment letter from
J.P. Morgan and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., or JPMorgan
Chase, which is subject to various conditions, for a proposed
new $1.6 billion senior secured revolving credit facility
and a $1.25 billion bridge facility. In place of the bridge
facility, on February 3, 2010, Denbury completed the public
offering of $1 billion of its
81/4%
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2020, which is scheduled to close
on February 10, 2010. The newly committed financing will be
used to fund the cash portion of the merger consideration
(inclusive of payments due to Encore stock option holders),
refinance certain of Encores existing debt, pay
Encores severance costs, repay Denburys existing
credit facility, pay merger-related transaction costs and
provide additional liquidity. Denburys receipt of the
financing contemplated by the merger agreement is a condition to
closing the merger. Accordingly, under the merger agreement,
even if the other conditions to the closing of the merger are
satisfied, if financing is not available in full, the closing of
the merger may be delayed until the date, if any, on which the
proceeds of the financing are available in full. Moreover, the
merger agreement may be terminated if the merger has not
occurred on or before the outside date of
May 31, 2010. If Denbury is unable to obtain this financing
in full because one of the conditions to the financing is not
satisfied or one or more of the counterparties to the financing
commitment letter defaults on its obligations, the closing of
the merger could be significantly delayed or may not occur at
all.
35
The
date that Encore stockholders will receive the merger
consideration is uncertain.
The date that Encore stockholders will receive the merger
consideration depends on the completion date of the merger,
which is uncertain. While we expect to complete the merger in
the first quarter of 2010, the completion date of the merger
might be later than expected because of unforeseen events, but
in no event later than May 31, 2010 unless Denbury and
Encore otherwise agree.
Business
uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the merger is
pending may have an adverse effect on Encore or
Denbury.
Uncertainty about the effect of the merger on employees,
suppliers, partners, regulators and customers may have an
adverse effect on Encore. These uncertainties may impair
Encores ability to attract, retain and motivate key
personnel until the merger is consummated and could cause
suppliers, customers and others that deal with Encore to defer
purchases or other decisions concerning Encore or seek to change
existing business relationships with Encore. In addition, the
merger agreement restricts both Denbury and Encore from making
certain acquisitions and taking other specified actions without
the others approval. These restrictions could prevent
either party from pursuing attractive business opportunities
that may arise prior to the completion of the merger.
Failure
to complete the merger or delays in completing the merger could
negatively affect Denburys and Encores stock prices
and future businesses and operations.
If the merger is not completed for any reason, Denbury and
Encore may be subject to a number of risks, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
the separate companies will not realize the benefits expected
from the merger, including a potentially enhanced financial and
competitive position;
|
|
|
|
the current market price of Denbury common stock or Encore
common stock may reflect a market assumption that the merger
will occur and a failure to complete the merger could result in
a negative perception by the stock market of either company or
both generally and a resulting decline in the market price of
its or their common stock;
|
|
|
|
certain costs relating to the merger, including certain
investment banking, financing, legal and accounting fees and
expenses, must be paid even if the merger is not completed, and
either party may be required to pay substantial fees to the
other if the merger agreement is terminated under specified
circumstances; and
|
|
|
|
there may be substantial disruption to each of Denburys
and Encores business and distraction of each
companys management and employees from
day-to-day
operations because matters related to the merger (including
integration planning) may require substantial commitments of
time and resources, which could otherwise have been devoted to
other opportunities that could have been beneficial to Denbury
or Encore, as applicable.
|
Delays in completing the merger could exacerbate uncertainties
concerning the effect of the merger, which may have an adverse
effect on the business following the merger and could defer or
detract from the realization of the benefits expected to result
from the merger.
The
merger agreement restricts Encores ability to pursue
alternatives to the merger.
The merger agreement contains no shop provisions
that, subject to limited fiduciary exceptions, restrict
Encores ability to initiate, solicit, encourage or
facilitate, discuss, negotiate or accept a competing third party
proposal to acquire all or a significant part of Encore.
Further, there are a limited number of exceptions that would
allow Encores board of directors to withdraw or change its
recommendation to holders of Encore common stock that they vote
in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement. Although
Encores board of directors is permitted to take these
actions if it determines in good faith that these actions are
likely to be
36
required to comply with its fiduciary duties, doing so in
specified situations could entitle Denbury to terminate the
merger agreement and to be paid a termination fee of
$120 million.
Denbury required that Encore agree to these provisions as a
condition to Denburys willingness to enter into the merger
agreement. However, these provisions could discourage a
potential acquiror that might have an interest in acquiring all
or a significant part of Encore from considering or proposing
that acquisition, even if it were prepared to pay consideration
with a higher per share cash or market value than the
consideration Denbury proposes to pay in the merger or might
result in a potential competing acquiror proposing to pay a
lower per share price to acquire Encore than it might otherwise
have proposed to pay because of the added expense of the
termination fee that may become payable to Denbury in certain
circumstances.
Denbury
is subject to financial risks if it fails to complete the merger
under certain circumstances.
If Denbury terminates the merger agreement because it is unable
to obtain the financing necessary to consummate the merger, it
will be required to pay to Encore a $300 million
termination fee. Further, there is a limited exception that
would allow Denburys board of directors to withdraw or
change its recommendation to holders of Denbury common stock
that they vote in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement.
Although Denburys board of directors is permitted to take
these actions if it determines in good faith that these actions
are likely to be required to comply with its fiduciary duties,
doing so in specified situations could entitle Encore to
terminate the merger agreement and to be paid a termination fee
of $120 million.
Ownership
by Denbury stockholders will be diluted by the
merger.
The merger will dilute the ownership position of the current
stockholders of Denbury. Based on the number of shares of Encore
common stock outstanding as of February 3, 2010, Denbury
would issue to Encore stockholders between 115 million and
146 million shares of Denbury common stock in the merger,
which will represent an increase in the Denbury aggregate shares
outstanding of between 44% and 56%. As a result, Denbury
stockholders would hold between 64% and 70% of the combined
companys common stock outstanding after the completion of
the merger, and Encore stockholders would hold between 30% and
36% of the combined companys common stock outstanding
after the completion of the merger.
The
rights of Encore stockholders will be governed by Denburys
restated certificate of incorporation, as amended, and
bylaws.
All Encore stockholders who receive shares of Denbury common
stock in the merger will become Denbury stockholders and their
rights as stockholders will be governed by Denburys
restated certificate of incorporation, as amended, and its
bylaws. There are material differences between the current
rights of Encore stockholders, which are governed by
Encores second amended and restated articles of
incorporation and bylaws, and the rights of holders of Denbury
common stock. See Comparison of Stockholder Rights
beginning on page 111.
Risks
Relating to the Combined Company After the Merger
In addition to the risks described below, for a discussion of
the risks relating to Denburys business after the merger,
see Risk Factors in Denburys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, and Risk
Factors in Encores Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009.
The
combined company will be more leveraged after the merger than it
has been historically and may not be able to obtain adequate
financing to execute its operating strategy.
Denbury will be more leveraged after the merger than it has been
historically. Upon closing of the credit facilities contemplated
by the merger agreement and J.P. Morgans financing
commitment letter, Denbury will have $1.975 billion of
revolving credit facilities and $1.0 billion of senior
subordinated notes or alternate financing under a bridge loan.
(See The Merger Financing of the Merger
beginning on page 91). Amounts
37
outstanding under these financing instruments combined with
Denburys existing debt are expected to be approximately
$3.5 billion of total pro forma combined long-term debt
after the completion of the merger. This level of indebtedness
could result in Denbury having difficulty accessing capital
markets or raising capital on favorable terms and Denburys
financial results could be negatively affected by its inability
to raise capital or because of the cost of such capital.
Upon consummation of the merger, Denbury and all of its
restricted subsidiaries must comply with various restrictive
covenants contained in its revolving credit facilities, the
indentures related to senior subordinated notes and any of its
future debt arrangements. These covenants will, among other
things, limit the ability of Denbury and all of its restricted
subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt or liens;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends;
|
|
|
|
make payments in respect of or redeem or acquire any debt or
equity issued by Denbury;
|
|
|
|
sell assets;
|
|
|
|
make loans or investments; and
|
|
|
|
acquire or be acquired by other companies.
|
Denburys substantial debt following the merger could have
important consequences to you. For example, it could:
|
|
|
|
|
increase Denburys vulnerability to general adverse
economic and industry conditions;
|
|
|
|
limit Denburys ability to fund future working capital and
capital expenditures, to engage in future acquisitions or
development activities, or to otherwise realize the value of its
assets and opportunities fully because of the need to dedicate a
substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to payments
on its debt or to comply with any restrictive terms of its debt;
|
|
|
|
limit Denburys flexibility in planning for, or reacting
to, changes in the industry in which it operates; or
|
|
|
|
place Denbury at a competitive disadvantage as compared to its
competitors that have less debt.
|
Realization of any of these factors could adversely affect
Denburys financial condition. In addition, although
Denbury and Encore both have hedges in place for 2010 and 2011,
these hedges have varying floors and ceilings and will only
partially protect the combined companys cash flow. A
decline in commodity prices may require that the combined
company reduce its planned capital expenditures, which may have
a corresponding negative effect on its anticipated production
growth.
The
combined company may be unable to secure sufficient amounts of
carbon dioxide to expand its
CO2
EOR operations into the Rocky Mountain region.
Denburys long-term growth strategy is focused on its
CO2
tertiary recovery operations. Production of crude oil from the
expansion of its tertiary operations into the Rocky Mountain
region depends on having access to sufficient amounts of
CO2
in this region. The ability to produce this oil and execute this
growth strategy would be hindered if Denbury was unable to
obtain necessary
CO2
volumes in the Rocky Mountain region at a cost that is
economically viable.
The
combined company may experience an impairment of its
goodwill.
Denbury expects to recognize a substantial amount of goodwill in
connection with consummation of the merger and the allocation of
the purchase price thereto. Denbury tests goodwill for
impairment annually during the fourth quarter, or between annual
tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that may
indicate the fair value of its reporting unit is less than the
carrying amount. The need to test for impairment can be based on
several indicators, including but not limited to a significant
reduction in prices of oil or
38
natural gas, a full cost ceiling write-down of oil and natural
gas properties, unfavorable revisions to oil and natural gas
reserves and significant changes in the expected timing of
production, or changes in the regulatory environment.
Fair value calculated for the purpose of testing for impairment
of our goodwill is estimated using the expected present value of
future cash flows method and comparative market prices when
appropriate. A significant amount of judgment is involved in
performing these fair value estimates for goodwill since the
results are based on estimated future cash flows and assumptions
related thereto. Significant assumptions include estimates of
future oil and natural gas prices, projections of estimated
quantities of oil and natural gas reserves, estimates of future
rates of production, timing and amount of future development and
operating costs, estimated availability and cost of
CO2,
projected recovery factors of reserves and risk-adjusted
discount rates. Denbury bases its fair value estimates on
projected financial information which Denbury believes to be
reasonable. However, actual results may differ from those
projections.
39
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENTS CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document and the documents incorporated by reference herein
include forward-looking statements about Denbury,
Encore and the combined company, within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(which is referred to as the Securities Act in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus), Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (which is referred to as the
Exchange Act in this joint proxy statement/prospectus), and the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, regarding the
financial position, business strategy, production and reserve
growth, possible or assumed future results of operations, and
other plans and objectives for the future operations of Denbury
following the merger, and statements regarding integration of
the businesses of Denbury and Encore and general economic
conditions.
The events and circumstances referred to in forward-looking
statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties.
Although we believe that in making such statements our
expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, the events and
circumstances referred to may be influenced by factors that
could cause actual outcomes and results to be materially
different from those projected.
Except for their respective obligations to disclose material
information under United States federal securities laws, neither
Denbury nor Encore undertakes any obligation to release publicly
any revision to any forward-looking statement, to report events
or circumstances after the date of this document or to report
the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Statements that are predictive in nature, that depend upon or
refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such
as will, would, should,
plans, likely, expects,
anticipates, intends,
believes, estimates, thinks,
may and similar expressions, are forward-looking
statements. The following important factors, in addition to
those discussed under Risk Factors and elsewhere in
this document, could affect the future results of the energy
industry in general, and Denbury after the merger in particular,
and could cause those results to differ materially from those
expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
|
|
uncertainties inherent in the development and production of and
exploration for oil and natural gas and in estimating reserves;
|
|
|
|
unexpected difficulties in integrating the operations of Denbury
and Encore;
|
|
|
|
the need to make unexpected future capital expenditures
(including the amount and nature thereof);
|
|
|
|
the impact of oil and natural gas price fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
the effects of our indebtedness, and increases in interest rates
thereon, which could restrict our ability to operate, make us
vulnerable to general adverse economic and industry conditions,
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors that have less debt, and have other adverse
consequences;
|
|
|
|
the effects of competition;
|
|
|
|
the success of our risk management activities;
|
|
|
|
the availability of acquisition or combination opportunities (or
lack thereof);
|
|
|
|
the impact of current and future laws and governmental
regulations;
|
|
|
|
environmental liabilities that are not covered by an effective
indemnification agreement or insurance; and
|
|
|
|
general economic, market or business conditions.
|
All written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to
Denbury or Encore or persons acting on behalf of Denbury or
Encore are expressly qualified in their entirety by such
factors. For additional information with respect to these
factors, see Where You Can Find More Information.
40
THE
STOCKHOLDER MEETINGS
Denburys board of directors is using this document to
solicit proxies from Denbury stockholders for use at
Denburys special meeting of stockholders. Encores
board of directors is using this document to solicit proxies
from Encore stockholders for use at Encores special
meeting of stockholders. In addition, this document constitutes
a prospectus covering the issuance of Denbury common stock
pursuant to the merger agreement.
Times and
Places
The stockholder meetings will be held as follows:
|
|
|
For Denbury stockholders:
|
|
For Encore stockholders:
|
10:00 a.m., local time
|
|
10:00 a.m., local time
|
March 9, 2010
|
|
March 9, 2010
|
5100 Tennyson Parkway
Suite 1200
Plano, Texas 75024
|
|
777 Main Street
Suite 900
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
|
|
|
|
Purposes
of the Stockholder Meetings
Denbury
The purpose of the Denbury special meeting is as follows:
1. to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the merger
agreement, which provides for, among other things, the merger of
Encore with and into Denbury and the issuance of Denbury common
stock to Encore stockholders as part of the merger consideration;
2. to consider and vote upon any adjournment of the special
meeting, if necessary or appropriate to solicit additional
proxies in favor of the foregoing proposal; and
3. to transact any other business that may properly come
before the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of
the special meeting.
Denburys board of directors has unanimously adopted a
resolution approving the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated by it, declared the merger agreement advisable and
recommends unanimously that Denbury stockholders vote at the
special meeting to adopt the merger agreement, which provides
for, among other things, the merger of Encore with and into
Denbury and the issuance of Denbury common stock to Encore
stockholders as part of the merger consideration. In addition,
Denburys board of directors recommends unanimously that
Denbury stockholders vote to approve any adjournment of the
special meeting, if necessary or appropriate to solicit
additional proxies.
Encore
The purpose of the Encore special meeting is as follows:
1. to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the merger
agreement;
2. to consider and vote upon any adjournment of the special
meeting, if necessary or appropriate to solicit additional
proxies in favor of the foregoing proposal; and
3. to transact any other business that may properly come
before the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of
the special meeting.
Encores board of directors has unanimously adopted a
resolution approving the merger agreement, declared the merger
agreement advisable and determined that the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated by it are fair to and in the best
interests of Encore and its stockholders, and recommends
unanimously that Encore stockholders vote at the special meeting
to adopt the merger agreement and to approve any adjournment of
the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate to solicit
41
additional proxies. As described under The
Merger Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger
that May be Different from Your Interests beginning on
page 81, Encores directors and executive officers
have agreements and arrangements that provide them with
interests in the merger that may be different from, or are in
addition to, those of Encore stockholders.
Record
Date and Outstanding Shares
Denbury
Only holders of record of Denbury common stock at the close of
business on February 3, 2010 are entitled to notice of, and
to vote at, the Denbury special meeting. On the record date,
there were 262,392,777 shares of Denbury common stock issued and
outstanding, held by approximately 1,341 holders of record. Each
share of Denbury common stock entitles the holder of that share
to one vote on each matter submitted for stockholder approval.
Encore
Only holders of record of Encore common stock at the close of
business on February 3, 2010 are entitled to notice of, and
to vote at, the Encore special meeting. On the record date,
there were 55,542,510 shares of Encore common stock issued
and outstanding held by approximately 418 holders of record.
Each share of Encore common stock entitles the holder of that
share to one vote on each matter submitted for stockholder
approval.
Quorum
and Vote Necessary to Approve Proposals
Denbury
The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of one-third
(1/3) of the shares of Denbury common stock outstanding is
necessary to constitute a quorum at the Denbury special meeting.
Adoption of the merger agreement, however, requires the
affirmative vote of a majority of the then outstanding shares of
Denbury common stock that are entitled to vote as of the record
date. Any adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary or
appropriate to solicit additional proxies requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of Denbury common stock
representing a majority of the votes present in person or by
proxy at the special meeting entitled to vote, whether or not a
quorum exists, without further notice other than by announcement
made at the stockholders meeting, so long as the adjournment is
for 30 days or less and no new record date is set.
Encore
The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a
majority of the shares of Encore common stock outstanding is
necessary to constitute a quorum at the Encore special meeting.
Adoption of the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote
of a majority of the then outstanding shares of Encore common
stock that are entitled to vote as of the record date. Any
adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate
to solicit additional proxies requires the affirmative vote of
the holders of Encore common stock representing a majority of
the votes present in person or by proxy at the special meeting
entitled to vote, whether or not a quorum exists, without
further notice other than by announcement made at the
stockholders meeting, so long as the adjournment is for
30 days or less and no new record date is set.
Tabulation
of the Votes
Denbury
Denbury has appointed Hagberg and Associates to serve as the
Inspector of Election for the Denbury special meeting. Hagberg
and Associates will independently tabulate affirmative and
negative votes and abstentions.
Encore
Encore has appointed BNY Mellon Shareowner Services to serve as
the Inspector of Election for the Encore special meeting. BNY
Mellon Shareowner Services will independently tabulate
affirmative and negative votes and abstentions.
42
Proxies
The applicable proxy card will be sent to each Denbury and
Encore stockholder on or promptly after their respective record
dates. If you receive a proxy card, you may grant a proxy to
vote on the proposals by marking, dating and signing your proxy
card and returning it to Denbury or Encore, as applicable, or by
following the procedures to submit a proxy by telephone or
through the Internet. If you hold your stock in the name of a
bank, broker or other nominee, you should follow the
instructions of the bank, broker or nominee when voting your
shares. All shares of stock represented by properly executed
proxies (including those given by telephone or through the
Internet) received prior to or at the Denbury special meeting or
the Encore special meeting, as applicable, will be voted in
accordance with the instructions indicated on such proxies.
Proxies that have been revoked properly and on time will not be
counted. If no instructions are indicated on a properly executed
returned proxy (including those given by telephone or through
the Internet), that proxy will be voted, with respect to
Denbury, to adopt the merger agreement and to approve any
adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate
to solicit additional proxies and, with respect to Encore, to
adopt the merger agreement and to approve any adjournment of the
special meeting, if necessary or appropriate to solicit
additional proxies.
Denbury
In accordance with New York Stock Exchange rules, brokers and
nominees who hold shares in street name for
customers may not exercise their voting discretion with respect
to the adoption of the merger agreement, or the approval of any
adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate
to solicit additional proxies. Thus, absent specific
instructions from the beneficial owner of such shares, brokers
and nominees may not vote such shares with respect to the
approval of those proposals. Broker non-votes will be considered
in determining the presence of a quorum. A broker non-vote will
have the effect of a vote against the adoption of
the merger agreement, but will have no effect on the approval of
any adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary or
appropriate to solicit additional proxies.
A properly executed proxy marked ABSTAIN, although
counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum,
will not be voted on any matter brought before the stockholder
meeting and will be the equivalent of a vote against
all of the proposals to be voted upon.
Encore
In accordance with New York Stock Exchange rules, brokers and
nominees who hold shares in street name for
customers may not exercise their voting discretion with respect
to the adoption of the merger agreement or the approval of any
adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate,
to solicit additional proxies. Thus, absent specific
instructions from the beneficial owner of such shares, brokers
and nominees may not vote such shares with respect to the
approval of those proposals. Broker non-votes will be considered
in determining the presence of a quorum. A broker non-vote will
have the effect of a vote against the adoption of
the merger agreement but will have no effect on the approval of
any adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary or
appropriate to solicit additional proxies.
A properly executed proxy marked ABSTAIN, although
counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum,
will not be voted on any matter brought before the stockholder
meeting and will be the equivalent of a vote against
all of the proposals to be voted upon.
Other
Business
The Denbury and Encore boards of directors are not currently
aware of any business to be acted upon at the stockholders
meetings other than the matters described in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. If, however, other matters are properly
brought before either meeting, the persons appointed as proxies
for the applicable meeting will have discretion to vote or act
on those matters according to their judgment.
43
Revocation
of Proxies
You may revoke your proxy before it is voted by:
|
|
|
|
|
submitting a new proxy with a later date;
|
|
|
|
notifying the corporate secretary of Denbury or Encore, as
applicable, in writing before the special meeting that you have
revoked your proxy; or
|
|
|
|
voting in person or notifying the corporate secretary of Denbury
or Encore, as applicable, in writing at the special meeting of
your wish to revoke your proxy.
|
Solicitation
of Proxies
In addition to solicitation by mail, Denbury and Encore may make
arrangements with brokerage houses and other custodians,
nominees and fiduciaries to send proxy materials to beneficial
owners. The directors, officers and employees of Denbury and
Encore may solicit proxies by telephone, Internet or in person.
These directors, officers and employees will receive no
additional compensation for doing so. In addition, Denbury has
retained Georgeson Inc. and Encore has retained BNY Mellon
Shareowner Services, each a proxy solicitation firm, to assist
with the solicitation of proxies. Denbury and Encore will pay
Georgeson Inc. and BNY Mellon Shareowner Services $17,000 and
$10,000, respectively, plus additional charges related to
telephone calls and certain other services, costs and expenses.
To ensure sufficient representation at the special meetings,
Denbury and Encore may request the return of proxy cards by
telephone, the Internet or in person. The extent to which this
will be necessary depends entirely upon how promptly proxy cards
are returned. Denbury and Encore urge you to send in your proxy
without delay.
If the merger is consummated, each of Denbury and Encore will
pay its respective cost of soliciting proxies, including the
cost of preparing and mailing this document and the expenses
incurred by brokerage houses, nominees and fiduciaries in
forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners. Upon the
occurrence of certain termination events, Encore may be required
by the merger agreement to reimburse Denbury for fees and
expenses such as these incurred by Denbury of up to
$10 million. See Terms of the Merger
Agreement Termination, Amendment and
Waiver Fees and Expenses.
44
DENBURY
THE COMBINED COMPANY
Denbury is engaged in the acquisition, development, operation
and exploration of oil and natural gas properties in the Gulf
Coast region of the United States, primarily in Mississippi,
Louisiana, Texas and Alabama. Denbury is the largest oil and
natural gas producer in Mississippi and owns the largest
reserves of
CO2
used for tertiary oil recovery east of the Mississippi River.
Encore is engaged in the acquisition and development of oil and
natural gas reserves from onshore fields in the United States.
Encores properties and oil and gas reserves are located in
four core areas: the Cedar Creek Anticline in the Williston
Basin in Montana and North Dakota; the Permian Basin in west
Texas and southeastern New Mexico; the Rocky Mountain region,
which includes non-Cedar Creek Anticline assets in the
Williston, Big Horn and Powder River Basins in Wyoming, Montana
and North Dakota and the Paradox Basin in southeastern Utah; and
the Mid-Continent region, which includes the Arkoma and Anadarko
Basins in Oklahoma, the North Louisiana Salt Basin and the East
Texas Basin.
The acquisition by Denbury of Encore positions the combined
company as one of the largest crude
oil-focused,
independent North American exploration and production companies,
with oil constituting approximately 75% of its combined proved
reserves and with future growth predominantly in oil. The
acquisition also creates one of the largest
CO2
EOR platforms in both the Gulf Coast and Rocky Mountain regions,
complemented by Denburys ownership and control of the
Jackson Dome
CO2
source in Mississippi and
CO2
supply contracts with potential anthropogenic sources of
CO2
in the Gulf Coast, Midwest and Rockies. Denbury expects the
combined companys size and scale, access to capital and
geographic presence to facilitate larger
CO2
projects, additional property acquisitions and opportunities to
partner with
CO2
emitters, in both the Gulf Coast and Rocky Mountain regions.
The combined company will nearly double Denburys inventory
of oil reserves (prior to the Conroe acquisition) potentially
recoverable with
CO2
tertiary operations. Denbury believes that the longer lead-time
of
CO2
project development in the Rocky Mountain region is well-matched
with a strong growth profile from low-risk development of
unconventional resource plays in Encores large acreage
positions in the Bakken oil shale in North Dakota and positions
in the Haynesville shale in north Louisiana.
Recent
Events
On December 18, 2009, Denbury purchased a 95% interest in
the Conroe Field, a potentially significant tertiary flood north
of Houston, Texas, for approximately $256.4 million in cash
and 11,620,000 shares of Denbury common stock. As part of
the transaction, Denbury agreed to provide the sellers with
resale registration rights covering those shares; however, the
sellers may not sell any of these shares until the earlier of
the closing of the Encore merger, its termination or, under
certain circumstances, June 28, 2010. Denbury has
internally estimated that the Conroe Field interests have
significant estimated net reserve potential from
CO2
tertiary recovery. Denbury has also preliminarily estimated that
the acquired Conroe Field interests have approximately
20 MMBOE of proved conventional reserves as of
December 1, 2009, nearly all of which are proved developed.
The Conroe Field assets are currently producing around 2,500
BOE/d net to Denburys acquired interest. Denbury will need
to build a pipeline to transport
CO2
to this field, preliminarily estimated to cover approximately
80 miles, as an extension of Denburys Green pipeline.
Based on Denburys preliminary estimates, Denbury will
spend an additional $750 million to $1.0 billion,
including the cost of the
CO2
pipeline, to develop the Conroe Field as a tertiary flood.
On December 30, 2009, Denbury sold its remaining 40%
interest in its Barnett Shale natural gas assets for
$210 million to the same privately-held company that
purchased the 60% interest in Denburys Barnett Shale
natural gas assets in mid-2009. Production attributable to the
40% interest in the Barnett Shale natural gas assets sold
averaged approximately 4,596 BOE/d during the third quarter
of 2009.
Denbury and Encore each recently announced their respective
year-end 2009 proved reserves and production. Denburys
estimated total proved reserves at December 31, 2009 were
192.9 MMBbls of oil and 88 Bcf of natural gas, based
on the first day-of-the-month
12-month
average 2009 NYMEX oil price of $61.18 per Bbl and Henry Hub
natural gas cash price of $3.87 per MMBtu, with necessary
adjustments applied to
45
each field to arrive at the net price received by Denbury. On a
BOE basis, Denburys proved reserves were 207.5 MMBOE
at December 31, 2009, of which approximately 93% was oil
and approximately 62% categorized as proved developed. Using
$58.36 per Bbl of oil, $38.56 per Bbl of natural gas liquids and
$3.99 per Mcf of natural gas, Denburys estimated
PV-10 Value
was $3.1 billion at December 31, 2009. Based on
preliminary data, Denburys estimated average daily
production rate during the fourth quarter of 2009 is
approximately 44,940 BOE/d, which results in an estimated
average annual production rate for 2009 of approximately 48,280
BOE/d.
Encores estimated total proved reserves at
December 31, 2009 were 147.1 MMBbls of oil and
439.1 Bcf of natural gas, based on first-day-of-the-month
12-month
average prices during 2009 of $61.18 per Bbl of oil and $3.83
per Mcf of natural gas. On a BOE basis, Encores proved
reserves were 220.3 MMBOE at December 31, 2009, of
which approximately 67% was oil and approximately 80%
categorized as proved developed. Using 2009 average prices,
Encores estimated
PV-10 Value
was approximately $2.1 billion at December 31, 2009.
Based on preliminary data, Encores estimated average daily
production during the fourth quarter of 2009 was approximately
45,143 BOE/d.
Giving effect to the merger as if it occurred on
December 31, 2009, the pro forma estimated proved reserves
of the combined company would be approximately 427.8 MMBOE,
consisting of approximately 340.0 MMBbls and 527.0 Bcf.
Using 2009 average prices, the combined companys PV-10
Value would be $5.2 billion at December 31, 2009.
On February 5, 2010, Denbury and one of its subsidiaries
sold all of the subsidiarys Class A membership
interests in Genesis Energy, LLC, the general partner of Genesis
Energy, L.P., or Genesis, to an affiliate of Quintana Capital
Group L.P. for net proceeds of approximately $82 million
(including those related to Genesis management incentive
compensation and other selling costs). This sale gives the buyer
control of Genesis general partner. The sale of
Denburys interests in the general partner does not include
the sale of its approximate 10% ownership of Genesis
outstanding common units.
46
THE
MERGER
Background
of the Merger
In May 2008, the Encore board of directors reviewed
Encores strategic alternatives, including a possible sale
or merger. As part of this process, Encore engaged Lehman
Brothers Inc. as its financial advisor and considered the
advantages and disadvantages of a negotiated sale process with a
targeted buyer, a private auction process and a broad public
auction process. The Encore board ultimately determined to
conduct a two-stage public auction process, consisting of
preliminary diligence and the receipt of indicative bids in
stage one and more extensive diligence and final bids in stage
two. On May 21, 2008, Encore publicly announced that its
board had authorized Encores management team to explore a
broad range of strategic alternatives to further enhance
shareholder value, including, but not limited to, a sale or
merger of Encore.
From late May through late June 2008, Encores management
or its financial advisor communicated with over 60 potential
bidders, 48 of which requested preliminary materials on Encore
and a form of confidentiality and standstill agreement. Denbury
was contacted as a potential bidder, but did not participate in
the process. Encore entered into confidentiality and standstill
agreements with 16 of the 48 potential bidders (consisting of
both strategic and private equity buyers), with the remaining
potential bidders indicating that they were not interested in
participating in Encores strategic alternatives process.
By June 18, 2008, Encore had received indicative bids from
six of the 16 potential bidders that had signed confidentiality
and standstill agreements. After discussing the terms of each
indicative bid, the Encore board decided to invite five of the
six bidders into the second stage of the strategic alternatives
process, which would consist of extensive management
presentations, data room access and submission of a final bid in
late July 2008. These five bidders had submitted competitive
indicative bids, represented a strong cross-section of strategic
buyers and were believed to be likely to submit final bids that
included a meaningful premium to the then-current market price.
The sixth indicative bid was determined to be too low, and the
likelihood of raising it meaningfully too remote, to warrant the
diversion of management attention from the other five bidders
and the general business of Encore. Encore subsequently received
an indication of interest from a private equity fund, which was
invited to participate in the second stage of the process and
became the sixth potential bidder.
On July 16, 2008, the Encore board met to discuss the
diligence process and to receive an update on the status of the
strategic alternatives process. Three of the prospective bidders
were actively conducting diligence and making inquiries of
management. A fourth prospective bidder was less active in the
diligence process and had expressed an interest in acquiring
only certain portions of Encore. The remaining two prospective
bidders were not actively participating in the diligence process.
Between mid July 2008 and late July 2008, four of the six
prospective bidders effectively dropped out of the strategic
alternatives process. The two remaining prospective bidders were
asked to submit final bids by July 28, 2008.
On July 29, 2008, the Encore board met for the purpose of
evaluating final bids. Although the two remaining prospective
bidders were very complimentary of Encores strategy,
assets and personnel, neither company submitted a definitive
acquisition proposal to acquire Encore. During the summer of
2008, the credit and commodity markets were under significant
stress, as reflected by the increase in the average yield among
U.S. high yield issuers and the volatility in oil prices
between May and late July 2008, when prospective bidders
submitted their final bids. Against this backdrop, the remaining
two prospective bidders stated they were unwilling to move
forward with such a large acquisition.
On August 5, 2008, Encore publicly announced that its board
of directors had decided that continuing to pursue a sale or
merger at that time was not in the best interest of its
stockholders. In connection with this announcement, Encore
explained that its plan going forward included the alternatives
of divesting non-core properties, dropping down properties into
its subsidiary master limited partnership, ENP, and purchasing
put options on crude oil with a strike price of $110
per barrel for calendar year 2009. Encore terminated Lehman
Brothers Inc.s engagement as its financial advisor in
connection with Encores evaluation of strategic
alternatives, effective August 17, 2008.
47
Between August 2008 and September 2009, Encore continued to
implement its business plan as discussed with the Encore board.
In early July 2009, Phil Rykhoek, Denburys Chief Executive
Officer, contacted Robert Reeves, Encores Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, and suggested that the
two of them, together with Jon S. Brumley, Encores Chief
Executive Officer and President (whom we refer to as
Mr. Brumley), and Tracy Evans, Denburys President and
Chief Operating Officer, meet to discuss potential transactions
between Denbury and Encore. Also in early July 2009,
Mr. Gareth Roberts, Denburys Co-Chairman of the Board
and Chief Strategist, called Mr. Brumley to suggest a
similar meeting. The meeting was initially scheduled for
August 5, 2009, but due to subsequent scheduling conflicts
ultimately occurred on September 4, 2009. During the
meeting, Mr. Rykhoek proposed that Denbury and Encore
explore the desirability and feasibility of the following
potential opportunities: (1) the potential acquisition by
Denbury of Encores oil and gas properties in the Rocky
Mountain region, (2) a potential joint venture between
Denbury and Encore to exploit Encores oil and gas
properties in the Rocky Mountain region, and (3) a possible
business combination between Denbury and Encore.
Mr. Brumley indicated that Encores Rocky Mountain
assets were an integral part of Encores long-term
strategy. He also did not encourage further discussions
regarding Mr. Rykhoeks proposals at the time.
During early to late September 2009, Encores management
evaluated, and held individual discussions with directors
regarding, the prospect of a sale or merger of Encore, both with
Denbury and with other possibly interested parties.
On September 29, 2009, the Encore board of directors met to
discuss a possible sale or merger. At the meeting, the Encore
board considered a variety of macroeconomic and company-specific
factors in considering a possible sale or merger.
Mr. Brumley identified six companies (which are referred to
as the targeted bidders) that, in his view, offered the greatest
potential for a possible strategic transaction with Encore. In
addition to Denbury, these companies included three large
publicly traded energy companies who were involved in the summer
2008 strategic alternatives process (one of which was involved
throughout the process until the termination of the second
stage) and two other large publicly traded energy companies. The
Encore board assessed various financial and other
characteristics of each company, along with the strategic
rationale for each company to engage in a business combination
with Encore.
The Encore board then considered the appropriate process to
undertake if it decided to pursue a possible sale or merger of
Encore. The Encore board concluded that a process involving
confidential inquiries with likely suitors was preferable to a
publicly announced auction process and was more likely to
achieve the best value reasonably available for Encores
stockholders at the time. The Encore board then authorized
Encores executive officers to pursue discussions with the
targeted bidders and, if interest developed, to enter into
confidentiality and standstill agreements and exchange
information relevant to a strategic transaction.
The Encore board then discussed the possible valuation range for
Encores shares and directed Encores management to
prepare additional materials for review in order to aid the
Encore board in assessing the financial component of potential
bids. The Encore board then discussed the retention of Barclays
Capital to act as its financial advisor and assist the Encore
board with its evaluation of a potential business combination.
Barclays Capital acquired the North American investment banking
business of Lehman Brothers, which served as Encores
financial advisor for the 2008 public auction process. After
deliberation, the Encore board advised management to retain
Barclays Capital after initial contacts by management with
potential suitors and an evaluation by Encores management
of their level of interest. A financial advisory engagement
letter between Encore and Barclays Capital was executed on
October 9, 2009.
Encores counsel, Baker Botts L.L.P., then advised the
Encore board of its fiduciary duties under the circumstances.
Shortly after the September 29, 2009 board meeting,
Mr. I. Jon Brumley and Mr. Jon S. Brumley began
contacting the targeted bidders. Mr. Brumley called
Mr. Rykhoek on September 30, 2009, and indicated that
while Encore was not interested in selling particular
properties, it would entertain a possible merger of Encore
48
at the right price. Mr. Brumley suggested that the
companies enter into a confidentiality and standstill agreement
so that Encore data could be provided to Denbury.
On September 30, 2009, Encore entered into separate
confidentiality and standstill agreements with Denbury and
Company A providing for the receipt by Denbury and Company A of
confidential information regarding Encore. Also on
September 30, 2009, Mr. Brumley sent Company A a copy
of Encores most recent investor presentation.
On October 1, 2009, Mr. Brumley sent Mr. Rykhoek
a detailed investor presentation booklet and a copy of
Encores current proved, probable and possible reserve
report (which had been updated through September 30, 2009
by Encores management), the year-end 2008 reserve report
prepared by Miller & Lents, Encores independent
petroleum engineering firm, engineering and geology exhibits, a
project inventory list, and an analysis of lease operating
expenses. Also on October 1, 2009, Mr. Brumley sent
similar materials to Company A.
On October 1, 2009, Encore and Company B, which had been
actively involved throughout the summer 2008 strategic
alternatives process, entered into a confidentiality and
standstill agreement providing for the receipt by Company B of
confidential information regarding Encore.
On October 2, 2009, Encore entered into separate
confidentiality and standstill agreements with Company C and
Company D providing for the receipt by each company of
confidential information regarding Encore. Both Company C and
Company D had been involved in the summer 2008 process. As of
the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, Company A,
Company B, Company C and Company D remain subject to
confidentiality and standstill agreements, as do five of the
thirteen other companies that participated in Encores
strategic alternatives process during the summer of 2008.
On October 5, 2009, senior officers of Encore met at
separate times with representatives of Company A and Company D
to make a presentation about Encores business and to
respond to questions. The Encore presentation included
information on, among other things, the following matters:
reserve potential by geographic area; Encores
CO2
program; Encores drilling program; the West Texas joint
venture with ExxonMobil; development opportunities on
Encores Haynesville and Bakken acreage; financial metrics;
net asset values; and a five-year business model. On
October 6, 2009, senior officers of Encore met with
representatives of Company B to make a similar presentation
about Encores business and to respond to questions.
On October 5, 2009, during a Denbury board of directors
meeting called to consider various topics unrelated to Encore,
Denbury senior management provided a summary of the discussions
between Denbury and Encore, gave an overview of Encores
properties, enhanced oil recovery (EOR) potential
and other perceived opportunities, and discussed the strategic
benefits of acquiring Encore. Denburys board, by
consensus, authorized Denburys management to continue
discussions with Encore with a view toward an acquisition by
Denbury of Encore.
Also on October 6, 2009, Mr. Brumley spoke with the
chief executive officer of Company E, who indicated that Company
E would not be interested in acquiring Encore. Company E did not
provide a reason for its decision not to pursue a possible
acquisition of Encore.
On October 8, 2009, senior officers of Encore met at
separate times with management of Denbury and Company C to make
a presentation about Encores business (similar to the
presentation made to Company A and Company D) and to
respond to questions.
On October 9, 2009, Encore sent a copy of the presentation
about Encores business to its directors.
On October 12, 2009, Denbury senior management met to
discuss the potential acquisition of Encore, and decided to seek
an underwritten financing proposal from JPMorgan Chase to
finance the transaction and to request that J.P. Morgan act
as financial advisor to Denbury. An indemnity letter was signed
between Denbury and J.P. Morgan on October 14, 2009
and fees for services were discussed, and a financial advisory
engagement letter was subsequently executed on October 30,
2009.
49
During the month of October 2009, Encore responded to extensive
diligence inquiries from Denbury, Company A, Company B, Company
C and Company D.
On October 14, 2009, the Encore board met with its legal
and financial advisors to: (1) receive an update from
Encore senior management on the sale process; (2) review
and consider various reference values for Encore;
(3) evaluate and, if appropriate, approve a per share price
that, if deemed tactically appropriate, could be proposed to one
or more potential bidders as a price at which the board would
respond favorably to a proposal to acquire Encore; and
(4) receive information on the level of potential
change-in-control
payments to the members of Encores strategic team.
Mr. Brumley indicated that each of the six identified
companies, other than Company E, had expressed an interest in
exploring the possibility of a transaction. Mr. Brumley
noted that Encore had entered into confidentiality and
standstill agreements with the remaining five interested
companies and provided them with diligence information, as well
as answered extensive additional diligence questions. The Encore
board discussed the diligence process and the level of interest
expressed by each company. Representatives from Barclays Capital
then made a presentation to the Encore board regarding
preliminary reference values for Encore. Prior to summarizing
the reference values for Encores common stock, Barclays
Capital commented on the significant changes in the
U.S. economy over the past several years including, but not
limited to, changes in the U.S. gross domestic product,
unemployment rates, the cost of credit, access to capital and
significant fluctuations in oil and natural gas prices. The
Encore board then discussed Encores stock price
performance between October 13, 2007 and October 12,
2009, noting that the price of Encores common stock closed
at a low for the period of $17.41 on March 2, 2009.
Barclays Capital then summarized various valuation methodologies
used in its preliminary evaluation of reference values for
Encores common stock.
The Encore board then evaluated the results of each valuation
methodology and assessed the range of preliminary reference
values per share. The Encore board considered a request by
Company A that Encore state a price at which the Encore board
would favorably consider an acquisition proposal. After
receiving additional input from Barclays Capital, the Encore
board unanimously determined that a price of $50.00 per share
could be communicated to Company A. The Encore board authorized
Encores management team to determine the appropriate time
to convey such information to Company A.
On October 15, 2009, Mr. Rykhoek advised
Mr. Brumley that Denbury was not yet in a position to
propose the form or amount of the potential merger
consideration, but that the Denbury board would be meeting on
the following day for that purpose.
On October 16, 2009, Mr. I. Jon Brumley called Company
A and told them that the Encore board would enter into
negotiations with Company A regarding a proposal by Company A to
acquire Encore at a price of $50.00 for each share of Encore
common stock.
On October 16, 2009, Denburys board of directors met
to discuss, and was provided an update by management and J.P.
Morgan regarding, a potential merger with Encore, including the
form and amount of the potential merger consideration, a review
of various aspects of Encores business and assets, and the
strategic rationale of a combination with Encore.
After discussions with management and J.P. Morgan, the Denbury
board authorized Mr. Rykhoek to present a proposal to, and
negotiate such proposal with, Mr. Brumley within the
parameters described below. Later on October 16, 2009,
Mr. Rykhoek called Mr. Brumley and indicated that
Denbury was prepared to pay between $48.00 and $51.00 per share
for each share of Encore common stock, consisting of 25% to 30%
in cash and 70% to 75% in shares of Denbury common stock.
Mr. Brumley indicated that Encore had desired a minimum of
50% cash as consideration and that, coupled with the amount of
total consideration, the proposal may not be acceptable.
Mr. Rykhoek replied that Denbury considered it important
that at least 70% of the consideration be in the form of equity
so that the combined entities would be properly capitalized, but
indicated that Denbury might be able to pay up to $52.00 per
share. Mr. Brumley indicated that the price would need to
be at the top end of the range and that he would communicate
further with Mr. Rykhoek after the weekend.
50
On October 19, 2009, Mr. Brumley told Mr. Rykhoek
that Encore wanted a collar as a form of price protection if a
significant portion of the consideration to Encore stockholders
would be Denbury common stock. Mr. Brumley and
Mr. Rykhoek discussed a collar mechanism providing for
fixed merger consideration of $52.00 per share of Encore common
stock, consisting of $15.60 in cash (30%) and $36.40 (70%) in
Denbury common shares, with the Denbury stock value to be fixed
at $36.40 per Encore common share if Denbury common stock traded
during the collar period within a range of plus or minus 12%
from $15.71. Mr. Brumley also noted that Encore would need
to perform due diligence on Denbury in light of the significant
portion of the total consideration to be comprised of Denbury
common stock.
After discussing Encores counter proposal with senior
management, Mr. Rykhoek called Mr. Brumley, stating
that Denburys management would recommend approval of the
proposal to its board, and that Encore could proceed to prepare
a confidentiality and standstill agreement for the benefit of
Denbury and schedule a time for due diligence. Mr. Rykhoek
communicated with the members of the Denbury board on an
individual basis, outlining the terms of the proposal and
recommending that Denbury respond favorably to the proposal. The
Denbury board members concurred with managements
recommendation, and suggested that management proceed as
proposed, with further due diligence to be conducted by both
Denbury and Encore.
On October 19, 2009, Encore and Denbury entered into a
confidentiality and standstill agreement providing for the
receipt by Encore of confidential information regarding Denbury.
During the week of October 19, 2009, Mr. Brumley and
Mr. Rykhoek discussed various terms that could be included
in a merger agreement, including provisions regarding employee
benefits, financing commitments, operating covenants, 2009
bonuses for Encore employees, non-competition agreements from
certain members of Encores management, termination fees
and various other merger terms.
On October 20, 2009, Mr. Rykhoek sent Mr. Brumley
a schedule calculating the range of Denbury prices for the
proposed collar and related matters. Mr. Brumley replied
with an alternative version of the collar mechanism and an
explanation of the difference between the approaches proposed by
Denbury and Encore. Mr. Brumley also sent Mr. Rykhoek
a list of due diligence requests related to Denburys
business and confirmed plans for diligence meetings later in the
week.
Also on October 20, 2009, representatives of Company D
informed Encore management that Company D would not be
submitting a proposal to acquire Encore. Company D said it had
decided not to submit a proposal because Encores
properties did not fit with Company Ds overall strategic
focus.
On October 21, 2009, Mr. Brumley sent Mr. Rykhoek
a draft of a proposed merger agreement. Also on October 21,
2009, the chairman of Company A indicated to Mr. Brumley
that Company A was struggling to get to a valuation of $50.00
per share of Encore common stock, and the chief executive
officer of Company A told I. Jon Brumley that Company A liked
Encores properties and was working hard to develop a
proposal, but he was not sure if Company A could get to $50.00
per share.
On October 21 and 22, 2009, representatives of Encore and
Denbury, along with their respective legal and financial
advisors, met to receive more detailed presentations on the
companies, exchange additional diligence materials and respond
to questions regarding their respective businesses.
On October 22, 2009, Company A called Encore to request
additional information regarding tax matters in an attempt to
bridge their valuation to the $50.00 per share price proposed by
Encore on October 16, 2009.
On October 23, 2009, representatives of Company B informed
Encore management that Company B would not be submitting a
proposal to acquire Encore. Company B said it had decided not to
submit a proposal because it was not willing to pay a premium
above the then-current market price for Encores stock.
On October 24, 2009, Baker & Hostetler LLP,
counsel to Denbury, provided initial written comments on the
draft merger agreement to Baker Botts. After reviewing the
comments, Mr. Brumley called Mr. Rykhoek to ask him to
confirm that Denbury would be providing a binding financing
commitment letter in support of Denburys proposal to
acquire Encore. Later that day, Baker Hostetler provided a draft
of the financing commitment letter that Denbury had received
from counsel to JPMorgan Chase.
51
Also on October 24, 2009, Mr. Brumley asked
Mr. Rykhoek to put Denburys proposal to acquire
Encore in writing for purposes of distributing such proposal to
the Encore board at its next regularly scheduled meeting on
October 27, 2009. Mr. Rykhoek indicated that he would
provide such a letter in advance of the Encore board meeting.
Mr. Rykhoek and Mr. Brumley then discussed various
other proposed terms of the merger agreement.
On October 25, 2009, a representative of Company A
confirmed that it would not be able to achieve a $50.00 per
share price for Encores common stock. He advised that
Company A would continue to evaluate a potential proposal for
Encore at a lower price.
On October 26, 2009, Mr. Rykhoek sent Mr. Brumley
proposed changes to the employee benefit provisions of the draft
merger agreement in response to a conversation between them the
preceding week. Later that day, Mr. Rykhoek sent
Mr. Brumley a written proposal regarding an acquisition of
Encore. Mr. Brumley called Mr. Rykhoek and asked him
to revise the written proposal to reflect, among other things,
the collar mechanism. Shortly thereafter, Mr. Rykhoek sent
Mr. Brumley a revised written proposal, which included the
following terms:
|
|
|
|
|
a total per share consideration for all of the shares of Encore
common stock of $52.00 per share, consisting of up to 30% cash
and 70% in shares of Denbury common stock within the collar;
|
|
|
|
a proposal that the Denbury common stock be valued at $15.71 per
share in determining the number of Denbury common shares that
would constitute the equity portion of the consideration;
|
|
|
|
a collar mechanism whereby the number of shares of Denbury
common stock to be issued for each share of Encore common stock
would be adjusted based upon the average price of Denbury common
stock for a period prior to closing, limited to a 12% upward or
12% downward adjustment from $15.71;
|
|
|
|
an election mechanism whereby Encore stockholders could elect to
receive up to 100% of the consideration for their shares paid in
cash or 100% paid in Denbury common stock, provided that the
aggregate transaction consideration paid in cash and stock would
not exceed 30% and 70%, respectively, of the aggregate
transaction consideration (within the collar); and
|
|
|
|
that Denbury anticipated obtaining an underwritten financing
commitment from J.P. Morgan and JPMorgan Chase for a
$1.6 billion revolving credit facility, a
$1.25 billion bridge to a subordinated notes facility, and
a $375 million credit facility for ENP.
|
On October 26, 2009, Baker Botts distributed a revised
draft of the merger agreement, and Baker Hostetler forwarded a
revised draft of the financing commitment letter to Baker Botts.
From October 26 to October 31, 2009, Baker Botts and Baker
Hostetler exchanged comments on drafts of the merger agreement
and financing commitment letter and negotiated various merger
agreement provisions, including those relating to the structure
of the transaction, the scope of the parties
representations and warranties and covenants, employee matters,
the parties obligations not to pursue other transactions,
termination fees, and conditions, including financing
conditions, to the parties obligations to complete the
proposed transaction.
On October 27, 2009, Mr. Brumley sent Mr. Rykhoek
a proposed summary of benefits to be received or maintained for
Encore employees. Mr. Brumley and Mr. Rykhoek
discussed these issues by telephone, and Mr. Rykhoek sent
Mr. Brumley proposed changes to the employee benefit
provisions. Also on October 27, 2009, Mr. Rykhoek and
Mr. Brumley discussed a confidentiality agreement as an
alternative to a non-competition agreement for certain members
of the Encore management team, and Baker Hostetler provided to
Baker Botts a revised draft of the financing commitment letter
prepared by counsel for JPMorgan Chase.
On October 27, 2009, the Encore board of directors met for
its regularly scheduled quarterly meeting. At the meeting, the
Encore board of directors discussed Denburys business,
operations and financial condition, the terms of Denburys
proposal to acquire Encore and Denburys proposed financing
plan. Additionally, Barclays Capital presented information to
the Encore board of directors with respect to the financial
terms of Denburys proposal, the collar mechanism and the
pro forma consequences of the proposed transaction.
52
On October 28, 2009, Mr. Brumley and Mr. Rykhoek
discussed proposed changes to the draft financing commitment
letter and the timing of the proposed transaction, including
expectations regarding additional comments on the merger
agreement and tentative plans for informing rating agencies of
the proposed transaction. Also on October 28, 2009,
Mr. Brumley sent Mr. Rykhoek written comments on the
proposed financing commitment letter, and Baker Botts and Baker
Hostetler met to discuss open issues relating to the merger
agreement.
On October 29, 2009, Mr. Rykhoek and Mr. Brumley
exchanged
e-mails and
telephone calls regarding employee benefit matters and the terms
of the proposed financing commitment letter, including the
removal or modification of various conditions and the
termination fees payable under the financing commitment letter.
Later that day, following further discussions with Baker
Hostetler, counsel for JPMorgan Chase distributed a revised
draft of the financing commitment letter and related documents,
following which Baker Hostetler had discussions with Baker Botts
and counsel for JPMorgan Chase regarding proposed additional
changes to the financing commitment letter. In addition, Baker
Hostetler and Baker Botts exchanged merger agreement drafts and
comments and conducted further discussions regarding the terms
of the merger. That evening, Denburys board and senior
management met to informally discuss the transaction. At that
time, a draft of the proposed merger agreement was distributed.
On October 30, 2009, the Denbury board met to discuss the
proposed merger with Encore. At that meeting, Denburys
management provided the board with an overview of the proposed
transaction, and J.P. Morgan reviewed with the Denbury
board J.P. Morgans financial analysis of the proposed
transaction. In this regard, J.P. Morgan also indicated
that, based upon and subject to certain factors that would be
stated in its opinion, at the appropriate time it would be
prepared to render an opinion as to the fairness of the
consideration contemplated to be paid by Denbury. Baker
Hostetler then presented to the Denbury board a summary of the
terms of the merger agreement, a review of changes to the latest
draft of the merger agreement previously supplied to the board,
a review of the agreement terms still under discussion, and
draft board resolutions with respect to the proposed transaction
that would be proposed for adoption the following day, and
discussed with the board its fiduciary obligations. Baker
Hostetler then responded to various questions regarding the
documents and the transaction. At the same meeting, the Denbury
board reviewed updated cash flow forecasts and debt levels,
reviewed the terms of the underwritten financing by JPMorgan
Chase, agreed to implement additional hedges for 2011 after
signing the merger agreement, reviewed a draft of a proposed
press release and associated slide show presentation, and
discussed the appropriate consideration to be paid for Encore.
Management was excused from the meeting and the Denbury board
met in executive session and considered the closing stock prices
for Denbury and Encore, the relative consideration and the
appropriate premium. Management returned to the meeting and the
board instructed Mr. Rykhoek that the Denbury board would
like to proceed with the transaction but at a lower price.
Shortly after the meeting, Mr. Rykhoek called
Mr. Brumley to relay the Denbury boards conclusions
and proposed that the merger consideration be reduced to $48.00
per share, comprised of $14.40 in cash and $33.60 in Denbury
shares. Mr. Brumley indicated that Encore would consider
the revised proposal.
Also on October 30, 2009, Baker Hostetler and Baker Botts
exchanged further drafts of the merger agreement and comments
thereon and on ancillary documents, and continued communications
regarding the terms of the merger.
Later on October 30, 2009, Mr. Brumley called
Mr. Rykhoek to propose that the merger consideration be set
at $50.00 per share, comprised of $15.00 in cash and $35.00 in
Denbury shares. Mr. Brumley and Mr. Rykhoek discussed
the collar mechanism that would be associated with the $50.00
per share price and after discussion, agreed that they would
propose to their respective boards of directors that the 12%
collar be based upon an assumed Denbury stock price of $15.10
per share. Mr. Rykhoek indicated that he would discuss the
matter with the Denbury board and respond in due course.
Mr. Rykhoek then discussed these matters with the Denbury
board through a telephone board meeting, and shortly thereafter,
Mr. Rykhoek called Mr. Brumley to confirm that merger
consideration of $50.00 per share was acceptable to the Denbury
board, consisting of $15.00 in cash and $35.00 in Denbury common
shares (with a 12% collar around an assumed Denbury stock price
of $15.10), subject to an election mechanism (with a proration
feature) to provide for all cash or all
53
stock. Mr. Brumley told Mr. Rykhoek that he would
submit the revised proposal to the Encore board for its
consideration and later sent Mr. Rykhoek an analysis of the
collar mechanism based on the revised merger consideration
proposal.
Also on October 30, 2009, Mr. Allen, Chief Financial
Officer of Denbury discussed proposed revisions to the financing
commitment letter with JPMorgan Chase, its legal advisor, Baker
Hostetler and Baker Botts.
On October 30, 2009, Baker Botts provided the Encore board
with (1) a draft of the proposed merger agreement,
(2) an executive summary of the merger agreement,
(3) a draft of the proposed financing commitment letter
from J.P. Morgan and JPMorgan Chase, (4) an executive
summary of the financing commitment letter, (5) draft board
resolutions with respect to the proposed transaction,
(6) draft resolutions of the Compensation Committee with
respect to the proposed transaction, and (7) a draft
amendment to Encores stockholder rights agreement (to
exempt Denbury from the operation of the rights plan).
On October 31, 2009, Baker Hostetler and Baker Botts
continued discussions and the exchange of drafts and comments to
resolve the remaining open issues regarding the terms of the
merger, including those relating to the circumstances under
which either party could refuse to consummate the merger and the
termination fees payable in connection therewith.
On October 31, 2009, Encores compensation committee
met to review and recommend to the Encore board the treatment of
stock options and restricted stock in the merger.
On October 31, 2009, the Encore board, with all members in
attendance, met to review and consider the proposed merger with
Denbury. Management provided its assessment of the proposed
transaction in preliminary remarks. Baker Botts discussed with
the directors their fiduciary obligations under the
circumstances. Baker Botts provided the Encore board with marked
copies of the documents distributed to the board on
October 30, 2009 to show changes negotiated in the interim
time period. Baker Botts then summarized, and responded to
questions regarding, the material provisions of the proposed
merger agreement and the financing commitment letter. During the
Encore board meeting, Barclays Capital reviewed and responded to
questions regarding the financial terms of the proposed
transaction (including the collar) and provided its financial
analysis of the per share merger consideration to be received by
Encore stockholders. Barclays Capital rendered its opinion that,
as of October 31, 2009 and based upon and subject to the
qualifications, limitations and assumptions stated in its
opinion, the merger consideration to be received by the
stockholders of Encore was fair, from a financial point of view,
to such stockholders.
The Encore board then recessed while Mr. Jon S. Brumley
called Mr. Rykhoek to inquire about the status of the
Denbury board meeting that had commenced during the course of
the Encore board meeting. Mr. Brumley returned shortly
thereafter and advised the Encore board that the Denbury board
was still in session.
After further discussion, the Encore board unanimously
(1) determined that the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby (including the merger) were
advisable, fair to and in the best interests of Encore and its
stockholders, (2) approved the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby (including the merger), and
(3) resolved (subject to certain exceptions contained in
the merger agreement) to recommend the adoption of the merger
agreement by the Encore stockholders.
On October 31, 2009, the Denbury board met for final
consideration of the proposed merger. At the meeting,
J.P. Morgan rendered its oral opinion, which was
subsequently confirmed in writing, that, as of October 31,
2009, and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions
set forth in its opinion, the consideration to be paid by
Denbury in the proposed merger was fair, from a financial point
of view, to Denbury. Baker Hostetler presented a summary of the
changes to the merger agreement since the board meeting the
prior day and reviewed with the board the resolutions to be
considered and approved. After discussion of the matters
presented at the meeting and after receiving
J.P. Morgans fairness opinion, the Denbury board of
directors unanimously (1) determined that the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (including
the merger and the issuance of the shares of Denbury common
stock thereunder) were advisable, (2) approved the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (including
the merger and the issuance of the shares of Denbury common
stock thereunder), and (3) resolved
54
(subject to certain exceptions contained in the merger
agreement) to recommend the adoption of the merger agreement by
the Denbury stockholders.
During the afternoon of October 31, 2009, Denbury and
Encore executed the merger agreement.
On November 1, 2009, Denbury and Encore issued a joint
press release announcing the proposed transaction.
Reasons
for the Merger Encore
The Encore board of directors, at a special meeting held on
October 31, 2009, unanimously (1) determined that the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby
(including the merger) were advisable, fair to and in the best
interests of Encore and its stockholders, (2) approved the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby
(including the merger) and (3) resolved (subject to certain
exceptions contained in the merger agreement) to recommend the
adoption of the merger agreement by the Encore stockholders. In
reaching its conclusion, the Encore board consulted with
Encores management as well as Encores legal and
financial advisors and considered a number of factors, including
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate value and composition of the merger consideration
to be received by Encore stockholders in the merger.
|
|
|
|
That the merger consideration of $50.00 per share of Encore
common stock (applying the collar mechanism in the merger
agreement and based upon the closing sale price of Denbury
common stock on October 30, 2009 of $14.60 per share, the
last trading date before the date of the Encore board meeting),
represented a premium of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
35% above the closing sale price of Encore common stock on
October 30, 2009 of $37.07 per share;
|
|
|
|
28% above the closing sale price of Encore common stock on
October 5, 2009 (the 20th trading day prior to the
date of the Encore board meeting) of $39.08 per share; and
|
|
|
|
11% above the highest closing sale price of Encore common stock
during the 52-week period ended October 30, 2009 of $44.85
per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
That Encore had explored a variety of strategic alternatives
over an extended period of time, including both a publicly
announced process conducted during 2008 and, more recently,
discussions with a number of parties identified by Encore as
offering the greatest potential for a possible strategic
transaction with Encore. In that regard, the Encore board
considered the thoroughness of the efforts made in exploring and
reviewing potential alternatives (see
Background of the Merger).
|
|
|
|
The fact that if the Denbury
20-day
average price is between $13.29 and $16.91, Encore stockholders
receiving Denbury shares will receive per share merger
consideration with an aggregate value of $50.00 per share (based
on the Denbury
20-day
average stock price).
|
|
|
|
The fact that because the exchange ratio for the stock portion
of the merger consideration does not increase if the Denbury
20-day
average price is below $13.29 per Denbury share, and does not
decrease if the Denbury
20-day
average price is above $16.91 per Denbury share, the aggregate
value of the per share merger consideration to be received by
Encore stockholders (based on the Denbury
20-day
average price) would be less than $50.00 if the Denbury
20-day
average price falls below $13.29 and would be more than $50.00
if the Denbury
20-day
average price rises above $16.91.
|
|
|
|
The potential stockholder value that might result from other
alternatives available to Encore, including the alternative of
remaining as an independent public company, considering, in
particular, the potential for Encore stockholders to share in
any future earnings growth of Encore and continued costs, risks
and uncertainties associated with continuing to operate as a
public company.
|
|
|
|
The Encore boards familiarity with, and understanding of,
Encores business, assets, financial condition, results of
operations, current business strategy and prospects.
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
Information and discussions with Encore management and
Encores financial advisor regarding Denburys
business, assets, financial condition, results of operations,
business plan and prospects. In this regard, the Encore board
considered the size and scale of the combined company, including
the expected pro forma effect of the merger on the combined
companys proved reserves, production, cash flow per share,
and debt structure, noting that the larger combined company
would be better able to finance and absorb the capital costs of
long lead time projects such as tertiary recovery operations.
|
|
|
|
The complementary nature and geographic diversity of the assets
of the companies. In this regard, the Encore board also
considered the prospects of the combined company, including the
potential for the combined company to have a stronger
competitive position and greater opportunities for growth than
Encore would have operating independently, including the ability
to leverage their combined opportunities to develop
CO2
projects, particularly given Denburys experience in
tertiary recovery operations in legacy oil fields using
CO2.
|
|
|
|
The merger will establish a leading
CO2
EOR company. Denbury has substantial
CO2
reserves, has a successful tertiary recovery business on the
U.S. Gulf Coast and will have increased acquisition
opportunities in Louisiana and the Texas Gulf Coast,
particularly upon completion of its 320-mile Green Pipeline.
|
|
|
|
After completion of the construction phase of Denburys
320-mile Green Pipeline, Encore expects a larger portion of
Denburys capital budget to be invested in tertiary
development projects that have an expectation of increasing oil
production, as opposed to capital that is invested in
CO2
pipeline projects that transport
CO2
to Denburys oil fields. Encore believes these investments
in tertiary development projects that generate production growth
will increase stockholder value.
|
|
|
|
The merger will create one of the largest crude oil focused
independent exploration and production companies in North
America. The proved oil and natural gas reserves of the combined
company are expected to be approximately 75% oil reserves, an
advantage in light of the better profit margin for oil as
reflected in both the short-term and long-term marketplace for
oil versus natural gas.
|
|
|
|
That because the majority of the merger consideration (on an
aggregate basis) is payable in the form of Denbury common stock,
Encore stockholders would have the opportunity to participate in
the equity value of the combined company following the merger.
In that regard, the Encore board understood that the volatility
of prices for oil and natural gas and general stock market
conditions would cause the value of the consideration received
in the merger to fluctuate, perhaps significantly, following the
closing of the merger, but was of the view that on a long-term
basis it would be desirable for stockholders to have an
opportunity to retain a continuing investment in the combined
company following the merger.
|
|
|
|
The Encore boards understanding of and managements
review of overall market conditions, including then-current and
prospective commodity prices and the current and historical
trading prices for Denbury and Encore common stock, and the
boards determination that, in light of these factors, the
timing of the potential transaction was favorable to Encore.
|
|
|
|
The Encore boards expectation, supported by the financing
commitment letter, and established after consultation with
Encores financial and legal advisors regarding the terms
and degree of conditionality of the financing commitment letter,
that Denbury would be able to obtain the financing necessary to
pay the cash portion of the merger consideration payable under
the merger agreement and to finance the other transactions
contemplated in connection with the merger.
|
|
|
|
The financial analysis of Barclays Capital, Encores
financial advisor, presented to the Encore board at various
meetings, including the meeting held on October 31, 2009,
and the opinion of that firm rendered to Encores board on
that date as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of
the merger consideration to be received by the stockholders of
Encore, based upon and subject to the qualifications,
limitations and assumptions stated in such opinion, as more
fully described below under Opinion of
Encores Financial Advisor. The full text of the
opinion of Barclays Capital, setting forth the
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and
limitations on the reviews undertaken in connection with such
opinion, is attached as Annex B to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The review by the Encore board with its legal and financial
advisors of the structure of the merger and the financial and
other terms of the merger agreement, including the parties
representations, warranties and covenants, the conditions to
their respective obligations and the termination provisions, as
well as the likelihood of consummation of the merger and the
Encore boards evaluation of the likely time period
necessary to close the transaction. The Encore board also
considered the following specific aspects of the merger
agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
The combination of stock and cash consideration contemplated by
the merger agreement and the ability of Encore stockholders to
elect to receive either all cash, all stock, or cash and stock
consideration, subject to a proration feature.
|
|
|
|
The boards expectation that the stock portion of the
merger consideration will be received tax free by Encores
stockholders (see Material U.S. Federal
Income Tax Consequences of the Merger).
|
|
|
|
The nature of the closing conditions included in the merger
agreement, including the market, industry-related and other
exceptions to the events that would constitute a material
adverse effect on either Encore or Denbury for purposes of the
agreement, as well as the likelihood of satisfaction of all
conditions to the consummation of the merger.
|
|
|
|
Encores right to engage in negotiations with, and provide
information to, a third party that makes an unsolicited written
acquisition proposal, if the Encore board determines in good
faith, after consultation with its legal and financial advisors,
that such proposal constitutes or could reasonably be expected
to lead to a transaction that is more favorable to Encores
stockholders than the merger.
|
|
|
|
Encores right to change its recommendation to vote in
favor of the merger and terminate the merger agreement in order
to accept a superior proposal, subject to certain conditions and
payment of a $120 million termination fee and up to
$10 million of expenses to Denbury.
|
|
|
|
The right of the Encore board to change its recommendation to
vote in favor of the merger upon the occurrence of certain
intervening events if it determines in good faith (after
consultation with outside counsel) that the failure to take such
action would breach its fiduciary duties under applicable law.
|
|
|
|
The obligation of Denbury to pay to Encore, upon termination of
the merger agreement, either a $300 million termination
fee, a $120 million termination fee or a $60 million
termination fee under the circumstances specified in the merger
agreement (see Terms of the Merger Agreement
Termination, Amendment and Waiver Fees and
Expenses).
|
|
|
|
The obligation of Denbury to use its reasonable best efforts to
take all actions necessary to consummate the financing provided
for in the financing commitment letter and, if such financing is
unavailable, to use its reasonable best efforts to arrange to
obtain alternate financing for an equivalent amount of funds on
terms no less favorable to Denbury.
|
|
|
|
That termination fees of $120 million and $60 million,
and the agreement to reimburse Denbury for up to
$10 million of expenses incurred by Denbury in connection
with the merger, in each case payable by Encore to Denbury under
the circumstances specified in the merger agreement, were
reasonable in the judgment of the Encore board after
consultation with its legal and financial advisors.
|
|
|
|
The requirement that Encore stockholder approval be obtained as
a condition to consummation of the merger.
|
|
|
|
The obligations of Encore and Denbury to hold their respective
stockholders meetings even if their respective boards change
their recommendation of the merger.
|
57
In the course of its deliberations, the Encore board also
considered a variety of risks and other potentially negative
factors, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The possibility that the value of the per share merger
consideration to be received by Encore stockholders could be
less than $50.00 per share if the Denbury
20-day
average price is below $13.29.
|
|
|
|
The inability of Encores stockholders to benefit from an
increase, prior to the closing of the merger, in the trading
price of Denbury common stock unless and until the Denbury
20-day
average price is above $16.91 per share.
|
|
|
|
The fact that Denburys obligation to close the merger is
conditioned on its having received the financing contemplated by
the merger agreement.
|
|
|
|
Denburys expected level of indebtedness upon completion of
the merger.
|
|
|
|
The fact that Denburys obligation to close the merger is
conditioned on a vote of its stockholders.
|
|
|
|
That, while the merger is expected to be completed, there is no
assurance that all conditions to the parties obligations
to complete the merger will be satisfied or waived, and as a
result, it is possible that the merger might not be completed
even if approved by Encores and Denburys
stockholders.
|
|
|
|
That, under the terms of the merger agreement, Encore will be
required to pay to Denbury a termination fee of either
$120 million or $60 million and to reimburse Denbury
for up to $10 million of expenses if the merger agreement
is terminated under certain circumstances (see Terms of
the Merger Agreement Termination, Amendment and
Waiver Fees and Expenses).
|
|
|
|
The restrictions on the conduct of Encores business prior
to completion of the merger, requiring Encore to conduct its
business only in the ordinary course, subject to specific
limitations, which may delay or prevent Encore from undertaking
business opportunities that may arise pending completion of the
merger.
|
|
|
|
Risks of the type and nature described under Risk
Factors.
|
Encores board considered all of these factors as a whole
and, on balance, concluded that they supported a determination
to approve the merger agreement. The foregoing discussion of the
information and factors considered by the Encore board is not
exhaustive. In view of the wide variety of factors considered by
the Encore board in connection with its evaluation of the
proposed transaction and the complexity of these matters, the
Encore board did not consider it practical to, nor did it
attempt to, quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative weights
to the specific factors that it considered in reaching its
decision. The Encore board evaluated the factors described
above, among others, and reached a consensus that the proposed
transaction was advisable, fair to and in the best interests of
Encore and its stockholders. In considering the factors
described above and any other factors, individual members of the
Encore board may have viewed factors differently or given
different weight or merit to different factors.
In considering the recommendation of the Encore board to adopt
the merger agreement, Encore stockholders should be aware that
the executive officers and directors of Encore have certain
interests in the merger that may be different from, or in
addition to, the interests of Encore stockholders generally. The
Encore board was aware of these interests and considered them
when approving the merger agreement and recommending that Encore
stockholders vote to adopt the merger agreement. See
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger
that May be Different from Your Interests.
The Encore board of directors unanimously recommends that
Encores stockholders vote FOR adoption of the
merger agreement.
Properly dated and signed proxies, and proxies properly
submitted over the Internet and by telephone, will be so voted
unless Encores stockholders specify otherwise.
58
Reasons
for the Merger Denbury
The Denbury board of directors has determined that the merger is
in the best interests of Denbury and its stockholders. In
unanimously approving the merger and recommending that Denbury
stockholders vote to adopt the merger agreement, including the
issuance of Denbury common stock in connection with the merger,
the Denbury board of directors consulted with Denburys
management and legal and financial advisors and considered a
number of factors, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Encore owns legacy oil assets in Montana, North Dakota and
Wyoming with over 6 billion barrels of original oil in
place, assets that are distinguished by their long reserve life
and low decline rates and that have significant potential for
recovery of crude oil through
CO2
EOR.
|
|
|
|
The merger expands Denburys EOR platform, which is already
one of the countrys largest, by adding another core area
of focus, the Rocky Mountain region. Both Denburys Gulf
Coast core EOR area and the Rocky Mountain region have a
significant number of oil fields that are future acquisition
candidates for
CO2
flooding, providing multiple future growth opportunities for a
company of Denburys post-merger scale and geographic
presence.
|
|
|
|
The merger will nearly double Denburys potential oil
reserves (prior to the Conroe acquisition) recoverable through
EOR. Denbury expects its significant expertise in EOR in the
Gulf Coast to be directly applicable to Encores Rocky
Mountain oilfield assets.
|
|
|
|
Encores Bakken oil properties and Haynesville gas
properties both provide reserves and production potential from
shale formations, as Encore owns over 300,000 acres in the
Bakken area (one of the largest positions in the field) and over
19,000 acres in the Haynesville area of north Louisiana.
Denbury anticipates that these shale assets will provide
short-term production growth and cash flow while longer-term EOR
assets are developed, and will provide potentially significant
incremental reserve growth.
|
|
|
|
Denbury anticipates that EOR production from Encore properties
will provide production growth beginning in 2015, the time at
which Denburys current Gulf Coast EOR production is
presently predicted to peak.
|
|
|
|
The merger will establish a leading North American
CO2
EOR company at a critical juncture in the environmental policy
shift regarding carbon capture and storage. Denbury anticipates
that the merger will enhance Denburys position as a buyer
of choice of mature oil properties that can benefit from EOR,
and a leading partner for
CO2
emitters in offsetting their carbon footprints.
|
|
|
|
The merger will create one of the largest crude oil focused
independent exploration and production companies in North
America. The proved oil and gas reserves of the combined company
are expected to be approximately 75% oil reserves, an advantage
in light of the better profit margin for oil as reflected by
both the short-term and long-term marketplace for oil versus
natural gas.
|
|
|
|
Denbury anticipates that the increased size, scale and
diversification of the combined company will benefit its
stockholders by ultimately reducing Denburys cost of
capital and its operating costs per equivalent barrel.
Additionally, Denbury anticipates that it will be in a position
to undertake larger
CO2
projects because of the combined companys larger size.
|
|
|
|
Denbury believes the merger is advantageous to its stockholders,
as Denbury anticipates that post-merger the combined
companys cash flow and proved reserves per share will be
accretive to Denbury stockholders. Denbury expects the combined
company reserves and production to nearly double, with the net
increase in outstanding Denbury shares resulting from the merger
ranging from approximately 45% to 60%, depending on the number
of shares ultimately issued in the acquisition.
|
|
|
|
Denbury expects the anticipated capital structure of the company
after the merger will provide significant liquidity and an
opportunity to focus capital deployment on those projects with
the optimal return opportunities.
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
As part of the merger, Denbury will acquire the general partner
of ENP and an approximate 46% limited partner interest in that
entity. ENP affords a potential financing vehicle for the
combined company as a master limited partnership designed to
provide a reduced cost of capital for purchase of assets from
the large inventory of properties that will be owned by the
combined company. Dropdowns of acquired assets to ENP may
provide Denbury an attractive way to reduce its debt incurred as
part of the merger, to the extent ENP sells additional units to
the public instead of purchasing assets by incurring incremental
debt.
|
|
|
|
Denbury anticipates that combining the companies will produce
significant synergies, leading to reduced costs in the corporate
general and administrative area (including accounting fees,
legal fees and executive management team costs) and in the
operational area (including engineering costs and discounts for
purchasing goods and services on a larger scale).
|
|
|
|
Integration of the companies should be facilitated by the two
companies being headquartered within the same greater
metropolitan area.
|
|
|
|
The diversified nature of Encores oil and natural gas
assets, many of which are located in areas generally highly
regarded in the industry, should enhance Denburys ability
to sell a portion of the acquired assets to third parties in
order to reduce the debt incurred to finance the merger, while
allowing Denbury to retain acquired assets that it judges to be
core to its strategy.
|
|
|
|
The results of Denburys business, legal and financial due
diligence investigations of Encore, including information
concerning the financial condition, results of operations,
prospects and businesses of Denbury and Encore, including the
respective companies oil and gas reserves, production and
cash flows from operations, along with the relative performance
of Denburys common stock and Encores common stock
over various periods.
|
|
|
|
The expected impact of current industry, economic and market
conditions on the oil and gas industry generally and EOR in
particular.
|
|
|
|
The per-share net asset value (including both proved and
potential reserves) of both Denbury common stock and Encore
common stock.
|
|
|
|
The opinion of J.P. Morgan dated October 31, 2009, to
Denburys board of directors that, as of that date and
based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth
in its opinion, the consideration to be paid by Denbury in the
proposed merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to
Denbury, which opinion does not address the decision by Denbury
to enter into the transaction nor constitute a recommendation to
the stockholders of Denbury or Encore with respect to the
transaction, or their voting thereon.
|
|
|
|
The terms of the merger agreement, including termination fees
ranging from $60 million to $120 million that Encore
would have to pay Denbury if Encore terminates the merger
agreement for certain reasons specified in the merger agreement.
|
In the course of considering the above factors, the Denbury
board of directors also considered a variety of risks and other
potentially negative factors, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The combined company will have a higher debt to equity ratio and
a higher level of indebtedness than Denburys historical
levels, including the assumption
and/or
refinancing of approximately $1.2 billion of Encore debt.
This increased debt level could limit Denburys flexibility
and access to additional capital because of increased debt
service requirements and restrictive covenants and other
borrowing terms. Also, in view of the current volatility of the
credit markets, the cost of the debt refinancing and the debt
incurred to finance the merger could be higher than currently
projected.
|
|
|
|
There is a risk that oil and natural gas prices will decrease
significantly from the pricing assumptions used to evaluate the
desirability of the merger from a financial point of view.
|
|
|
|
The proved and potential oil and natural gas reserves of Encore
may not be as valuable or profitable as anticipated.
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease in oil and natural gas prices would reduce any
proceeds from expected property divestitures or may make such
divestitures less attractive, leaving Denbury with a higher debt
balance than anticipated.
|
|
|
|
If the conditions in the financing commitment letter to Denbury
are not satisfied, Denbury could possibly fail to secure
necessary financing, and could owe a $300 million
termination fee if lack of financing prevented consummation of
the merger.
|
|
|
|
Denbury would have to pay Encore termination fees ranging from
$60 million to $120 million if Denbury terminates the
merger agreement for certain other reasons specified in the
merger agreement.
|
|
|
|
The expected cost savings of the merger may not be realized or
not realized to the extent anticipated.
|
|
|
|
There are significant risks inherent in combining and
integrating two companies, including challenges associated with
integrating personnel, operations, information technologies and
financial reporting. In addition, successful integration of
companies requires the dedication of significant management
resources, which could temporarily distract managements
attention from the day-to-day businesses of the combined company.
|
Having considered these factors and the risks discussed under
Risk Factors, the potential benefits of the merger
outweigh these considerations in the judgment of the Denbury
board.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors that the
Denbury board considered is not exhaustive, but it is believed
to include the material factors considered by the Denbury board.
In view of the variety of factors considered in connection with
its evaluation of the proposed merger and the terms of the
merger agreement, the Denbury board did not consider it
practicable to quantify or assign relative weights to the
factors considered in reaching its conclusion. In addition,
individual Denbury directors may have given different weights to
different factors.
For the reasons set forth above, Denburys board of
directors recommends unanimously that Denbury stockholders vote
FOR the adoption of the merger agreement.
Financial
Projections
Encore and Denbury make publicly available only limited
information regarding their respective future performances, and
neither Encore nor Denbury has historically published
projections as to long-term future financial performance.
However, for internal purposes and in connection with the
process leading to the merger agreement, the managements of
Encore and Denbury prepared certain projections of future
financial and operating performance. The projections were
prepared by Encore and Denbury on a stand-alone basis and are
not anticipated to be representative of financial and operating
performance of the combined company going forward, which may
differ materially from the assumptions underlying the
projections for the individual companies on a standalone basis.
Encore provided its non-public projections to its board of
directors and its financial advisor. These projections were also
made available to potentially interested parties that signed
confidentiality agreements, including Denbury, and to
Denburys financial advisor. A summary of this information
is included below to give Encore and Denbury stockholders access
to non-public unaudited prospective Encore information that was
considered by Encores financial advisor for purposes of
evaluating the merger and preparing its financial analysis and
opinion to the Encore board of directors and that was reviewed
by Denburys financial advisor for purposes of evaluating
the merger and preparing its financial analysis and opinion to
the Denbury board of directors. Similarly, in connection with
Encores evaluation of the proposed merger, Denbury
provided to Encore and Encores financial advisor its
non-public projections with respect to Denbury. Denbury also
provided these projections to its board of directors and its
financial advisor. A summary of this Denbury non-public
information is included below to give Encore and Denbury
stockholders access to non-public unaudited prospective Denbury
information that was considered by Encores financial
advisor for purposes of evaluating the merger and preparing its
financial analysis and opinion to the Encore board of directors
and that was reviewed by Denburys financial advisor for
purposes of evaluating the merger and preparing its financial
analysis and opinion to the Denbury board of directors.
61
Encore
and Denbury caution you that uncertainties are inherent in
prospective financial information of any kind. None of Encore,
Denbury or any of their respective affiliates, advisors,
officers, directors or representatives has made or makes any
representation or can give any assurance to any Encore
stockholder, Denbury stockholder or any other person regarding
the ultimate performance of Encore, Denbury or the combined
company in relation to the summarized information set forth
below.
The summary projections set forth below summarize the most
recent projections provided prior to the execution of the merger
agreement to Barclays Capital and the Encore board of directors
and also to Denburys board of directors and J.P. Morgan.
The inclusion of the following summary projections in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus should not be regarded as an
indication that Encore, Denbury or their representatives
considered or consider the projections to be an accurate
prediction of future performance or events, and the summary
projections set forth below should not be relied upon as such,
nor regarded as a representation that such performance will be
achieved.
The projections summarized below were prepared by the
managements of Encore and Denbury in connection with the
evaluation of the proposed merger or for internal planning
purposes only and not with a view toward public disclosure or
toward compliance with generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP), the published guidelines of the SEC or the
guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants. Neither Ernst & Young LLP, nor
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, nor any other independent registered
public accounting firm has compiled, examined or performed any
procedures with respect to the prospective financial information
contained in the projections and accordingly, neither Ernst
& Young LLP nor PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP expresses an
opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto. The
Ernst & Young LLP reports incorporated by reference into
this joint proxy statement/prospectus relate to Encores
historical financial information, and the PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP reports incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus relate to Denburys historical
financial information. Such reports do not extend to the
projections included below and should not be read to do so. The
respective boards of directors of Encore and Denbury did not
prepare, and do not give any assurance regarding, the summarized
information.
The internal financial forecasts of Encore and Denbury (upon
which the projected information is based) are, in general,
prepared solely for internal use to assist in various management
decisions, including with respect to capital budgeting. Such
internal financial forecasts are inherently subjective in nature
and susceptible to interpretation and the effects of intervening
events and accordingly, such forecasts may not be achieved. The
internal financial forecasts also reflect numerous assumptions
made by management, including various estimates and assumptions
that may not be realized and are subject to significant
variables, uncertainties and contingencies, all of which are
difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the control of
the preparing party. Important factors that may affect or cause
the information below to differ from actual results include, but
are not limited to, the factors referenced under the
Cautionary Statements Concerning Forward-Looking
Statements and the Risk Factors sections of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus and other risks described
in Encores and Denburys respective Annual Reports on
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC for the year ended December 31, 2008,
and in subsequent quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
and current reports on
Form 8-K.
Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the assumptions made
in preparing the internal financial forecasts upon which the
foregoing projected financial information was based will prove
accurate. There will be differences between actual and
forecasted results, and the differences may be material. The
risk that these uncertainties and contingencies could cause the
assumptions to fail to be reflective of actual results is
further increased by the length of time in the future over which
these assumptions apply.
In developing the projections, Encore and Denbury made numerous
assumptions with respect to their respective projections for the
periods shown, including:
|
|
|
|
|
organic growth and the amounts and timing of related costs
(including capital costs) and potential economic returns;
|
|
|
|
outstanding debt during applicable periods, and the availability
and cost of capital;
|
|
|
|
the cash flow from existing assets and business activities and
the cash effect of income taxes;
|
|
|
|
the level of production of crude oil and natural gas;
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
in the case of Encore, distributions by ENP to its public
unitholders; and
|
|
|
|
other general business, market and financial assumptions.
|
For purposes of these projections, Encore and Denbury used the
same assumed average oil and natural gas prices for the periods
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010E
|
|
|
2011E
|
|
|
2012E
|
|
|
2013E
|
|
|
2014E
|
|
|
Assumed average prices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil NYMEX WTI($/Bbl)
|
|
$
|
71.07
|
|
|
$
|
74.44
|
|
|
$
|
76.63
|
|
|
$
|
78.73
|
|
|
$
|
80.00
|
|
Natural Gas NYMEX Henry Hub ($/Mcf)
|
|
$
|
6.13
|
|
|
$
|
6.84
|
|
|
$
|
7.01
|
|
|
$
|
7.08
|
|
|
$
|
7.20
|
|
Encore
The summarized projected financial information set forth below
reflects actual results through June 30, 2009, plus
Encores projected results for the remainder of 2009 and
for 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009E
|
|
|
2010E
|
|
|
2011E
|
|
|
2012E
|
|
|
2013E
|
|
|
2014E
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
EBITDAX(1)
|
|
$
|
648
|
|
|
$
|
520
|
|
|
$
|
631
|
|
|
$
|
738
|
|
|
$
|
822
|
|
|
$
|
907
|
|
Discretionary cash
flow(2)
|
|
$
|
508
|
|
|
$
|
385
|
|
|
$
|
490
|
|
|
$
|
600
|
|
|
$
|
692
|
|
|
$
|
787
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
EBITDAX represents net income from continuing operations before
interest expense (net), income taxes, depreciation, depletion
and amortization, exploration expense and non-cash stock-based
compensation expense. EBITDAX is not a financial measure
prepared in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered a
substitute for net income (loss) or cash flow from operating
activities prepared in accordance with GAAP. |
|
(2) |
|
Discretionary cash flow represents cash provided by operating
activities before changes in working capital less deferred
derivative contract premium payments and distributions to public
ENP unitholders. It is not a financial measure prepared in
accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as a
substitute for net income (loss) or cash flow from operating
activities prepared in accordance with GAAP. |
Denbury
The summarized projected financial information set forth below
was based on Denburys projections for 2010, 2011, 2012,
2013 and 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010E
|
|
|
2011E
|
|
|
2012E
|
|
|
2013E
|
|
|
2014E
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
EBITDA(1)
|
|
$
|
466
|
|
|
$
|
669
|
|
|
$
|
870
|
|
|
$
|
1,048
|
|
|
$
|
1,137
|
|
Adjusted cash flow from
operations(2)
|
|
$
|
392
|
|
|
$
|
556
|
|
|
$
|
740
|
|
|
$
|
933
|
|
|
$
|
1,003
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
EBITDA represents net income before interest expense (net),
income taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization, non-cash
derivative fair value gain (or loss) and non-cash equity-based
compensation expense. EBITDA is not a financial measure prepared
in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as a
substitute for net income (loss) or cash flow from operating
activities prepared in accordance with GAAP. |
|
(2) |
|
Adjusted cash flow from operations represents cash flow from
operations excluding working capital changes. It is not a
financial measure prepared in accordance with GAAP and should
not be considered as a substitute for cash flow from operating
activities prepared in accordance with GAAP. |
Furthermore, the summarized, prospective information does not
necessarily reflect revised prospects for Encores or
Denburys business, changes in general business or economic
conditions, or any other transactions or events that have
occurred since the date the information was prepared or that may
occur and that were not anticipated at the time the information
was prepared. The information summarized herein does not reflect
the effects of the merger or any related financing, which is
likely to cause actual results to differ materially. Since the
preparation of the information, among other developments, Encore
and Denbury have made publicly available their results of
operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2009;
additionally, on December 18,
63
2009, Denbury closed the purchase of the Conroe Field and on
December 30, 2009 closed the sale of Denburys
remaining interests in the Barnett Shale natural gas assets (see
Denbury The Combined Company).
Stockholders should review the companies respective
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and current
reports on
Form 8-K
to obtain this information.
NEITHER ENCORE NOR DENBURY INTENDS TO UPDATE OR OTHERWISE
REVISE THE ABOVE PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL INFORMATION TO REFLECT
CIRCUMSTANCES EXISTING AFTER THE DATE WHEN IT WAS FORMULATED OR
TO REFLECT THE OCCURRENCE OF FUTURE EVENTS, EVEN IF ANY OR ALL
OF THE ASSUMPTIONS UNDERLYING SUCH PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL
INFORMATION ARE NO LONGER APPLICABLE OR APPROPRIATE.
Opinion
of Encores Financial Advisor
On October 9, 2009, Encore engaged Barclays Capital to act
as its financial advisor with respect to the merger. On
October 31, 2009, Barclays Capital rendered its opinion to
Encores board of directors that, as of such date and based
upon and subject to the qualifications, limitations and
assumptions stated in its opinion, the merger consideration to
be received by the stockholders of Encore was fair, from a
financial point of view, to such stockholders.
The full text of Barclays Capitals opinion, dated as of
October 31, 2009, is attached as Annex B to this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. Holders of Encores common
stock are encouraged to read Barclays Capitals opinion for
a discussion of the procedures followed, factors considered,
assumptions made and qualifications and limitations of the
review undertaken by Barclays Capital in connection with its
opinion. The following is a summary of Barclays Capitals
opinion and the methodology that Barclays Capital used to render
its opinion. This summary is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the full text of the opinion.
Barclays Capitals opinion, the issuance of which was
approved by Barclays Capitals Fairness Opinion Committee,
is addressed to Encores board of directors, addresses only
the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the merger
consideration to be received by the stockholders of Encore and
does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder of
Encore as to how such stockholder should vote with respect to
the merger or any other matter. The terms of the merger were
determined through arms-length negotiations between Encore
and Denbury and were approved unanimously by Encores board
of directors. Barclays Capital did not recommend any specific
form or amount of consideration to Encores board of
directors or that any specific form or amount of consideration
constituted the only appropriate consideration for the merger.
Barclays Capital was not requested to address, and its opinion
does not in any manner address, Encores underlying
business decision to proceed with or effect the merger. In
addition, Barclays Capital expressed no opinion on, and its
opinion does not in any manner address, the fairness of the
amount or the nature of any compensation to any officers,
directors or employees of any parties to the merger, or any
class of such persons, relative to the consideration to be
offered to the stockholders of Encore in the merger. No
limitations were imposed by Encores board of directors
upon Barclays Capital with respect to the investigations made or
procedures followed by it in rendering its opinion.
In arriving at its opinion, Barclays Capital reviewed and
analyzed, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the specific terms of the merger, as detailed in the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
publicly available information concerning Encore and Denbury
that Barclays Capital believed to be relevant to its analysis,
including, without limitation, each of Encores and
Denburys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and Quarterly Reports
on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and June 30,
2009;
|
|
|
|
financial and operating information with respect to the
business, operations and prospects of Encore furnished to
Barclays Capital by Encore, including financial projections of
Encore prepared by the management of Encore, referred to herein
as the Encore Projections;
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
financial and operating information with respect to the
business, operations and prospects of Denbury furnished to
Barclays Capital by Denbury, including financial projections of
Denbury prepared by the management of Denbury, referred to
herein as the Denbury Projections;
|
|
|
|
estimates of certain (i) proved reserves, as of
December 31, 2008, for Encore as prepared by a third-party
reserve engineer, referred to herein as the Encore
Year-End 2008 Engineered Report, (ii) proved
reserves, as of September 30, 2009, for Encore prepared by
the management of Encore as a roll-forward from the Encore
Year-End 2008 Engineered Report and (iii) non-proved
reserves, as of September 30, 2009, for Encore as prepared
by the management of Encore ((i) through (iii) collectively
referred to herein as the Encore Reserve Reports);
|
|
|
|
estimates of certain (i) proved and probable reserves, as
of June 30, 2009, for Denbury as prepared by a third-party
reserve engineer, referred to herein as the Denbury
Mid-Year 2009 Engineered 2P Report, (ii) proved and
probable reserves, as of September 30, 2009, for Denbury
prepared by the management of Denbury as a roll-forward from the
Denbury Mid-Year 2009 Engineered 2P Report and
(iii) possible reserves, as of September 30, 2009, as
prepared by the management of Denbury ((i) through
(iii) collectively referred to herein as the Denbury
Reserve Reports and, together with the Encore Reserve
Reports, the Reserve Reports);
|
|
|
|
the trading histories of Encore common stock and Denbury common
stock from October 31, 2007 to October 30, 2009 and a
comparison of those trading histories with each other and with
those of other companies that Barclays Capital deemed relevant;
|
|
|
|
a comparison of the historical financial results and present
financial condition of Encore and Denbury with each other and
with those of other companies that Barclays Capital deemed
relevant;
|
|
|
|
a comparison of the financial terms of the merger with the
financial terms of certain other transactions that Barclays
Capital deemed relevant;
|
|
|
|
the potential pro forma impact of the merger on the current and
future financial performance of the combined company, including
the amounts and timing of the cost savings and operating
synergies expected by the management of Denbury to result from
the merger, referred to herein as the Expected
Synergies;
|
|
|
|
published estimates by independent equity research analysts with
respect to the future financial performance of Encore and
Denbury;
|
|
|
|
the relative contributions of Encore and Denbury to the current
and future financial performance of the combined company on a
pro forma basis; and
|
|
|
|
the results of Encores efforts to solicit indications of
interest and definitive proposals from third parties with
respect to an acquisition of Encore.
|
In addition, Barclays Capital had discussions with the
managements of Encore and Denbury concerning their respective
businesses, operations, assets, financial condition, reserves,
production profiles, hedging levels, commodity prices,
development programs, exploration programs and prospects, and
undertook such other studies, analyses and investigations as
Barclays Capital deemed appropriate.
In arriving at its opinion, Barclays Capital assumed and relied
upon the accuracy and completeness of the financial and other
information used by Barclays Capital without assuming any
responsibility for independent verification of such information
and further relied upon the assurances of the managements of
Encore and Denbury that they were not aware of any facts or
circumstances that would make such information inaccurate or
misleading. With respect to the Encore Projections, upon the
advice of Encore, Barclays Capital assumed that such projections
had been reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best
currently available estimates and judgments of the management of
Encore as to the future financial performance of Encore and that
Encore will perform substantially in accordance with such
projections. With respect to the Denbury Projections, upon the
advice of Encore and Denbury, Barclays Capital assumed that such
projections had been reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting
the best currently available estimates and judgments of the
management of
65
Denbury as to the future financial performance of Denbury and
Barclays Capital assumed that Denbury will perform substantially
in accordance with such projections.
With respect to the Encore Reserve Reports, Barclays Capital
discussed these reports with the management of Encore and upon
the advice of Encore, assumed that the Encore Reserve Reports
are a reasonable basis upon which to evaluate the proved and
non-proved reserve levels of Encore. With respect to the Denbury
Reserve Reports, Barclays Capital discussed these reports with
the managements of Encore and Denbury and upon the advice of
Encore and Denbury, assumed that the Denbury Reserve Reports are
a reasonable basis upon which to evaluate the proved and
non-proved reserve levels of Denbury. With respect to the
Expected Synergies, Barclays Capital assumed that the amount and
timing of the Expected Synergies are reasonable as estimated by
the management of Denbury and discussed with the management of
Encore and also assumed that the Expected Synergies will be
realized substantially in accordance with such estimates.
In arriving at its opinion, Barclays Capital did not conduct a
physical inspection of the properties and facilities of Encore
or Denbury and did not make or obtain any evaluations or
appraisals of the assets or liabilities of Encore or Denbury.
Barclays Capitals opinion necessarily is based upon
market, economic and other conditions as they existed on, and
could be evaluated as of, the date of its opinion letter.
Barclays Capital assumes no responsibility for updating or
revising its opinion based on events or circumstances that may
occur after the date of its opinion letter.
Barclays Capital assumed the accuracy of the representations and
warranties contained in the merger agreement and all agreements
related thereto. Barclays Capital also assumed, upon the advice
of Encore, that all material governmental, regulatory and third
party approvals, consents and releases for the merger would be
obtained within the constraints contemplated by the merger
agreement and that the merger would be consummated in accordance
with the terms of the merger agreement without waiver,
modification or amendment of any material term, condition or
agreement thereof.
Barclays Capital did not express any opinion as to any tax or
other consequences that might result from the merger, nor did
Barclays Capitals opinion address any legal, tax,
regulatory or accounting matters, as to which Barclays Capital
understands that Encore obtained any such advice it deemed
necessary from qualified professionals. In addition, Barclays
Capital expressed no opinion as to the prices at which shares of
(i) Encore common stock or Denbury common stock would trade
at any time following the announcement of the merger or
(ii) Denbury common stock would trade at any time following
the consummation of the merger.
In connection with rendering its opinion, Barclays Capital
performed certain financial, comparative and other analyses as
summarized below. In arriving at its opinion, Barclays Capital
did not ascribe a specific range of values to the shares of
Encore common stock, but rather made its determination as to the
fairness, from a financial point of view, to Encores
stockholders of the merger consideration to be received by such
stockholders on the basis of the various financial, comparative
and other analyses described below. The preparation of a
fairness opinion is a complex process and involves various
determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods
of financial and comparative analyses and the application of
those methods to the particular circumstances. Therefore, a
fairness opinion is not readily susceptible to summary
description.
In arriving at its opinion, Barclays Capital did not attribute
any particular weight to any analysis or factor considered by
it, but rather made qualitative judgments as to the significance
and relevance of each analysis and factor relative to all other
analyses and factors performed and considered by it and in the
context and circumstances of the merger. Accordingly, Barclays
Capital believes that its analyses must be considered as a
whole, as considering any portion of such analyses and factors,
without considering all analyses and factors as a whole, could
create a misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying
its opinion.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
used by Barclays Capital in preparing its opinion for
Encores board of directors. Certain financial, comparative
and other analyses summarized below include information
presented in tabular format. In order to understand fully the
methodologies used by Barclays Capital and the results of its
financial, comparative and other analyses, the tables must be
read together with the text of each summary, as the tables alone
do not constitute a complete description of the financial,
comparative and other analyses. In performing its analyses,
Barclays Capital made numerous
66
assumptions with respect to industry performance, general
business and economic conditions and other matters, many of
which are beyond the control of Encore and Denbury. None of
Encore, Denbury, Barclays Capital or any other person assumes
responsibility if future results are materially different from
those discussed. Any estimates contained in these analyses are
not necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of
future results or values, which may be significantly more or
less favorable than as set forth below. In addition, analyses
relating to the value of the businesses do not purport to be
appraisals or to reflect the prices at which the businesses
could actually be sold.
Summary
of Analyses
Barclays Capital prepared separate valuations of Encore and
Denbury before considering the pro forma impact of the Expected
Synergies from the merger. In determining valuation, Barclays
Capital used the following methodologies:
|
|
|
|
|
net asset valuation analysis;
|
|
|
|
comparable company analysis;
|
|
|
|
comparable transaction analysis;
|
|
|
|
discounted cash flow analysis; and
|
|
|
|
analysis of equity research analyst price targets.
|
Each of these methodologies was used to generate reference
enterprise or equity value ranges for each of Encore and
Denbury. The enterprise value ranges for each company were
adjusted for appropriate on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet
assets and liabilities including, without limitation, the
after-tax net present value of each companys current
commodity hedging portfolio as well as Encores and
Denburys respective interests in ENP and Genesis Energy,
L.P. and Genesis Energy, LLC, in order to arrive at implied
equity value ranges (in aggregate dollars) for each company.
Barclays Capital estimated a value range for Encores
ownership in ENP of $350 million to $450 million,
based on the public market price of ENPs limited partner
units as of October 30, 2009. Barclays Capital estimated a
value range for Denburys ownership in Genesis Energy, L.P.
and Genesis Energy, LLC of $150 million to
$200 million, based on the public market price of Genesis
Energy, L.P.s limited partner units as of October 30,
2009 and a multiple range of 12.5 to 17.5 times Denburys
general partner interest in Genesis Energy, L.P.s 2009
estimated distributable cash flow. The implied equity value
ranges were then divided by diluted shares outstanding,
comprising outstanding common shares and incorporating the
dilutive effect of outstanding options, restricted stock and
stock appreciation rights, as appropriate, in order to derive
implied equity value ranges per share for each company.
The implied equity value ranges per share of Encore common stock
were compared to the value of the merger consideration to be
received by Encores stockholders. The value of the merger
consideration to be received by Encores stockholders was,
for each valuation methodology, calculated as the product of the
implied equity value range per share of Denbury common stock and
an assumed exchange ratio of 2.0698, or the Minimum
Exchange Ratio, plus cash consideration of $15.00 per
Encore share. Barclays Capital evaluated the value of the merger
consideration to be received by Encores stockholders using
the Minimum Exchange Ratio because this calculation reflects the
minimum number of shares of Denbury common stock to be received
by Encore stockholders for each share of Encore common stock
held. In addition, the implied equity value ranges per share of
Denbury common stock were compared to Denburys closing
stock price of $14.60 per share on October 30, 2009.
The implied equity value ranges per share derived using the
various valuation methodologies listed above supported the
conclusion that the consideration to be received by
Encores stockholders in the merger was fair, from a
financial point of view, to Encores stockholders.
Net
Asset Valuation Analysis
Barclays Capital estimated the present value of the future
after-tax cash flows expected to be generated from each
companys proved, probable and possible reserves as of
September 30, 2009, based on reserve,
67
production and capital cost estimates as of September 30,
2009. The present value of the future after-tax cash flows was
determined using a range of discount rates and assuming a tax
rate of 35% and applying certain risk adjustments to certain
categories of reserves. In the case of Encore, such present
value of future after-tax cash flows excluded any reserves owned
by ENP. The net asset valuation analysis was performed under
four commodity price scenarios (Case I, Case II,
Case III and Case IV), which are described below.
Certain of the natural gas and oil price forecasts employed by
Barclays Capital were based on New York Mercantile Exchange, or
NYMEX, price forecasts (Henry Hub, Louisiana delivery for
natural gas and West Texas Intermediate, Cushing, Oklahoma
delivery for oil) to which adjustments were made to reflect
location and quality differentials. NYMEX gas price quotations
stated in heating value equivalents per million British Thermal
Units, or MMBtu, were adjusted to reflect the value per thousand
cubic feet, or Mcf, of gas. NYMEX oil price quotations are
stated in dollars per barrel, or Bbl, of crude oil.
The following table summarizes the natural gas and oil price
forecasts Barclays Capital employed to estimate the future
after-tax cash flows for each of the reserve categories Barclays
Capital considered for Encore and Denbury. Case IV reflects
an approximation of the NYMEX strip as of the close of business
on October 12, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q4 09E
|
|
|
2010E
|
|
|
2011E
|
|
|
2012E
|
|
|
2013E
|
|
|
2014E
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Oil WTI ($/Bbl)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case I
|
|
$
|
60.00
|
|
|
$
|
60.00
|
|
|
$
|
60.00
|
|
|
$
|
60.00
|
|
|
$
|
60.00
|
|
|
$
|
60.00
|
|
|
$
|
60.00
|
|
Case II
|
|
$
|
75.00
|
|
|
$
|
75.00
|
|
|
$
|
75.00
|
|
|
$
|
75.00
|
|
|
$
|
75.00
|
|
|
$
|
75.00
|
|
|
$
|
75.00
|
|
Case III
|
|
$
|
90.00
|
|
|
$
|
90.00
|
|
|
$
|
90.00
|
|
|
$
|
90.00
|
|
|
$
|
90.00
|
|
|
$
|
90.00
|
|
|
$
|
90.00
|
|
Case IV
|
|
$
|
71.32
|
|
|
$
|
76.67
|
|
|
$
|
80.30
|
|
|
$
|
82.56
|
|
|
$
|
84.71
|
|
|
$
|
86.76
|
|
|
$
|
86.76
|
|
Gas HHUB ($/Mcf)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case I
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
Case II
|
|
$
|
6.00
|
|
|
$
|
6.00
|
|
|
$
|
6.00
|
|
|
$
|
6.00
|
|
|
$
|
6.00
|
|
|
$
|
6.00
|
|
|
$
|
6.00
|
|
Case III
|
|
$
|
7.00
|
|
|
$
|
7.00
|
|
|
$
|
7.00
|
|
|
$
|
7.00
|
|
|
$
|
7.00
|
|
|
$
|
7.00
|
|
|
$
|
7.00
|
|
Case IV
|
|
$
|
4.78
|
|
|
$
|
6.29
|
|
|
$
|
6.91
|
|
|
$
|
7.07
|
|
|
$
|
7.16
|
|
|
$
|
7.28
|
|
|
$
|
7.28
|
|
The net asset valuation analyses yielded valuations for Encore
that implied an equity value range of $11.30 to $22.06 per share
for Case I, an equity value range of $28.03 to $43.72 per
share for Case II, an equity value range of $44.72 to $65.65 per
share for Case III and an equity value range of $41.75 to
$62.69 per share for Case IV.
The net asset valuation analyses yielded valuations for Denbury
that implied an equity value range of $8.24 to $12.00 per share
for Case I, an equity value range of $13.90 to $18.44 per
share for Case II, an equity value range of $19.14 to $24.86 per
share for Case III and an equity value range of $17.43 to
$22.75 per share for Case IV, as compared to Denburys
closing stock price of $14.60 per share on October 30, 2009.
The valuation of the merger consideration to be received by
Encores stockholders implied by the net asset valuations
analyses for Denbury and the merger consideration, taken as the
Minimum Exchange Ratio plus cash consideration of $15.00 per
Encore share, implied an equity value range of $32.06 to $39.84
per Encore share for Case I, an equity value range of
$43.77 to $53.17 per Encore share for Case II, an equity value
range of $54.62 to $66.46 per Encore share for Case III and
an equity value range of $51.08 to $62.09 per Encore share for
Case IV. Barclays Capital noted that these implied equity value
ranges per Encore share were in line with, or in excess of, the
implied equity value ranges per Encore share implied by Barclays
Capitals net asset valuation analyses for Encore in each
of Cases I, II, III and IV.
Comparable
Company Analysis
In order to assess how the public market values shares of
similar publicly traded companies, Barclays Capital reviewed and
compared specific financial and operating data relating to
Encore and Denbury with selected companies that Barclays Capital
deemed comparable to Encore and Denbury, based on its experience
in the exploration and production industry.
68
With respect to Encore, Barclays Capital reviewed the public
stock market trading multiples for the following exploration and
production companies, which Barclays Capital selected because of
their generally similar size, domestic focus and relatively oil
weighted portfolios:
|
|
|
|
|
Berry Petroleum Company;
|
|
|
|
Continental Resources, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Denbury Resources Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Plains Exploration & Production Company;
|
|
|
|
St. Mary Land & Exploration; and
|
|
|
|
Whiting Petroleum Corporation.
|
Using publicly available information, Barclays Capital
calculated and analyzed enterprise value multiples of each
comparable companys proved reserves and latest daily
production, pro forma for acquisition and divestiture activity.
The enterprise value of each comparable company was obtained by
adding its outstanding debt to the sum of the market value of
its common stock, the book value of its preferred stock and the
book value of any noncontrolling interest minus its cash
balance, as appropriate. Barclays Capital calculated the
enterprise value multiples of proved reserves and latest daily
production by dividing each companys calculated enterprise
value by its proved reserves and latest daily production,
respectively. The results of the Encore comparable company
analysis are summarized below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple Range of Comparable Companies of Encore:
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Enterprise Value as a Multiple of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/08 Pro Forma Proved Reserves ($/BOE)
|
|
$
|
9.57
|
|
|
$
|
19.56
|
|
|
$
|
43.43
|
|
Latest Daily Production ($/BOE/d)
|
|
$
|
52,072
|
|
|
$
|
74,328
|
|
|
$
|
185,223
|
|
Barclays Capital selected the comparable companies listed above
because their business and operating profiles are reasonably
similar to that of Encore. However, because of the inherent
differences between the business, operations and prospects of
Encore and those of the selected comparable companies, Barclays
Capital believed that it was inappropriate to, and therefore did
not, rely solely on the quantitative results of the selected
comparable company analysis. Accordingly, Barclays Capital also
made qualitative judgments concerning differences between the
business, financial and operating characteristics and prospects
of Encore and the selected comparable companies that could
affect the public trading values of each in order to provide a
context in which to consider the results of the quantitative
analysis. These qualitative judgments related primarily to the
differing sizes, growth prospects, profitability levels and
degrees of operational risk between Encore and the selected
companies included in the comparable company analysis. Based
upon these judgments, Barclays Capital selected enterprise value
multiple ranges of $17.00 to $22.00 per proved barrel of oil
equivalent and $70,000 to $95,000 per barrel of oil equivalent
of daily production. Utilizing these enterprise value multiple
ranges, the comparable company analysis implied an equity value
range for Encore of $35.92 to $52.51 per share.
With respect to Denbury, Barclays Capital reviewed the public
stock market trading multiples for the following exploration and
production companies, which Barclays Capital selected because of
their generally similar size, domestic focus and relatively oil
weighted portfolios:
|
|
|
|
|
Berry Petroleum Company;
|
|
|
|
Continental Resources, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Encore Acquisition Company;
|
|
|
|
Plains Exploration & Production Company;
|
|
|
|
St. Mary Land & Exploration; and
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
Whiting Petroleum Corporation.
|
Using publicly available information, Barclays Capital
calculated and analyzed enterprise value multiples of each
comparable companys proved reserves and latest daily
production, pro forma for acquisition and divestiture activity.
The enterprise value of each comparable company was obtained by
adding its outstanding debt to the sum of the market value of
its common stock, the book value of its preferred stock and the
book value of any noncontrolling interest minus its cash
balance, as appropriate. Barclays Capital calculated the
enterprise value multiples of proved reserves and latest daily
production by dividing each companys calculated enterprise
value by its proved reserves and latest daily production,
respectively. The results of the Denbury comparable company
analysis are summarized below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple Range of Comparable Companies of Denbury:
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Enterprise Value as a Multiple of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/08 Pro Forma Proved Reserves ($/BOE)
|
|
$
|
9.57
|
|
|
$
|
18.22
|
|
|
$
|
43.43
|
|
Latest Daily Production ($/BOE/d)
|
|
$
|
52,072
|
|
|
$
|
74,328
|
|
|
$
|
185,223
|
|
Barclays Capital selected the comparable companies listed above
because their businesses and operating profiles are reasonably
similar to that of Denbury. However, because of the inherent
differences between the business, operations and prospects of
Denbury and those of the selected comparable companies, Barclays
Capital believed that it was inappropriate to, and therefore did
not, rely solely on the quantitative results of the selected
comparable company analysis. Accordingly, Barclays Capital also
made qualitative judgments concerning differences between the
business, financial and operating characteristics and prospects
of Denbury and the selected comparable companies that could
affect the public trading values of each in order to provide a
context in which to consider the results of the quantitative
analysis. These qualitative judgments related primarily to the
differing sizes, growth prospects, profitability levels and
degrees of operational risk between Denbury and the selected
companies included in the comparable company analysis. Based
upon these judgments, Barclays Capital selected enterprise value
multiple ranges of $20.00 to $25.00 per proved barrel of oil
equivalent and $90,000 to $122,500 per barrel of oil equivalent
of daily production. Utilizing these enterprise value multiple
ranges, the comparable company analysis implied an equity value
range for Denbury of $11.86 to $17.10 per share, as compared to
Denburys closing stock price of $14.60 per share on
October 30, 2009.
The valuation of the merger consideration to be received by
Encores stockholders implied by the comparable company
analysis for Denbury and the merger consideration, taken as the
Minimum Exchange Ratio plus cash consideration of $15.00 per
Encore share, implied an equity value range of $39.55 to $50.39
per Encore share. Barclays Capital noted that this implied
equity value range per Encore share was in line with the implied
equity value range per Encore share yielded by Barclays
Capitals comparable company analysis for Encore.
Comparable
Transaction Analysis
Barclays Capital reviewed and compared the purchase prices and
financial multiples paid in selected other transactions that
Barclays Capital deemed relevant, based on its experience with
merger and acquisition transactions. Barclays Capital chose such
transactions based on, among other things, the similarity of the
applicable target in each transaction to Encore and Denbury with
respect to size, location of assets, oil weighting and other
characteristics that Barclays Capital deemed relevant.
The following list sets forth the transactions analyzed based on
such characteristics:
|
|
|
|
|
United Refining Companys acquisition of Chaparral Energy;
|
|
|
|
Apollo Global Managements acquisition of Parallel
Petroleum Corporation;
|
|
|
|
Hicks Acquisition Companys acquisition of Resolute Energy
Corporation;
|
|
|
|
Concho Resources acquisition of Henry Petroleum
Corporation;
|
|
|
|
XTO Energys acquisition of assets from Headington Oil
Company;
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
Linn Energys acquisition of assets from Lamamco Drilling
Company;
|
|
|
|
Penn West Energy Trusts acquisition of Canetic Resources
Trust;
|
|
|
|
TAQAs acquisition of assets from Pogo Producing Company;
|
|
|
|
Apache Corporations acquisition of assets from Anadarko
Petroleum Corporation;
|
|
|
|
Crescent Point Energy Corporations acquisition of Mission
Oil & Gas;
|
|
|
|
Chaparral Energys acquisition of Calumet Oil Company;
|
|
|
|
Sequoia Oil & Gas Trusts acquisition of Daylight
Resources Trust;
|
|
|
|
Pogo Producing Companys acquisition of Latigo
Petroleum; and
|
|
|
|
Penn West Energy Trusts acquisition of Petrofund Energy
Trust.
|
Using publicly available information, Barclays Capital
calculated and analyzed enterprise value multiples of proved
reserves and latest daily production in the comparable
transactions. Barclays Capital calculated the enterprise value
multiples of proved reserves and latest daily production by
dividing each transactions value by the disclosed proved
reserves and daily production, respectively. The results of the
comparable transaction analysis are summarized below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple Range of Comparable Transactions
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Enterprise Value as a Multiple of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved Reserves ($/BOE)
|
|
$
|
7.31
|
|
|
$
|
16.68
|
|
|
$
|
37.39
|
|
Latest Daily Production ($/BOE/d)
|
|
$
|
68,966
|
|
|
$
|
87,976
|
|
|
$
|
179,680
|
|
The reasons for and the circumstances surrounding each of the
selected comparable transactions analyzed were diverse and there
are inherent differences between the businesses, operations,
financial conditions and prospects of Encore, Denbury and the
companies and assets included in the comparable transaction
analysis. Accordingly, Barclays Capital believed that a purely
quantitative comparable transaction analysis would not be
particularly meaningful in the context of considering the
merger. Barclays Capital therefore made qualitative judgments
concerning differences between the characteristics of the
selected comparable transactions and the merger which would
affect the acquisition values of the selected target companies,
Encore and Denbury.
Based upon these judgments, Barclays Capital selected enterprise
value multiple ranges of $15.00 to $22.00 per proved barrel of
oil equivalent and $70,000 to $105,000 per barrel of oil
equivalent of daily production. Barclays Capital then applied
these enterprise value multiple ranges, as appropriate, to
Encores September 30, 2009 proved reserves, as
reflected in the Encore Reserve Reports, and estimated fourth
quarter 2009 average daily production (in both cases, as
adjusted to exclude reserves and production owned by ENP) to
imply an equity value range for Encore of $35.49 to $60.80 per
share.
Barclays Capital also applied the selected enterprise value
multiple ranges of $15.00 to $22.00 per proved barrel of oil
equivalent and $70,000 to $105,000 per barrel of oil equivalent
of daily production, as appropriate, to Denburys
September 30, 2009 proved reserves, as reflected in the
Denbury Reserve Reports, and estimated fourth quarter 2009
average daily production to imply an equity value range for
Denbury of $8.70 to $14.83 per share, as compared to
Denburys closing stock price of $14.60 per share on
October 30, 2009.
The valuation of the merger consideration to be received by
Encores stockholders implied by the comparable transaction
analysis for Denbury and the merger consideration, taken as the
Minimum Exchange Ratio plus cash consideration of $15.00 per
Encore share, implied an equity value range of $33.01 to $45.70
per Encore share. Barclays Capital noted that this implied
equity value range per Encore share was in line with the implied
equity value range per Encore share yielded by Barclays
Capitals comparable transaction analysis for Encore.
71
Discounted
Cash Flow Analysis
To calculate the estimated enterprise values of Encore and
Denbury using discounted cash flow analysis, Barclays Capital
added (i) projected after-tax unlevered free cash flows for
2010 through 2014 based on the Encore Projections and Denbury
Projections to (ii) the terminal values of
Encore and Denbury, respectively, as of 2014, and discounted
such amounts to their present value using a range of selected
discount rates. Specifically, Barclays Capital used a discount
rate range of 9.0% to 12.0%. The after-tax unlevered free cash
flows were calculated by subtracting cash taxes and capital
expenditures from earnings before interest expense, tax expense
and depreciation, depletion and amortization, or EBITDA, and
adjusting for other non-cash items. The residual values of
Encore and Denbury at the end of the forecast period, or
terminal values, were estimated by applying
enterprise value multiples to Encores and Denburys
respective 2014 EBITDA estimates. Barclays Capital used terminal
value EBITDA multiples of 6.0x to 7.0x for both Encore and
Denbury. This terminal value EBITDA multiple range was selected
based on the trading multiples of selected comparable publicly
traded companies as well as the terms of recently completed
acquisitions of similar assets and companies. In the case of
Encore, the reference enterprise value range implied by the
discounted cash flow analysis was adjusted to appropriately
reflect Encores interest in ENP.
The following table summarizes the natural gas and oil price
forecasts reflected in the Encore Projections and Denbury
Projections. This price forecast reflects an approximation of
the NYMEX strip as of the close of business on October 1,
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010E
|
|
|
2011E
|
|
|
2012E
|
|
|
2013E
|
|
|
2014E
|
|
|
Oil WTI ($/Bbl)
|
|
$
|
71.07
|
|
|
$
|
74.44
|
|
|
$
|
76.63
|
|
|
$
|
78.73
|
|
|
$
|
80.00
|
|
Gas HHUB ($/Mcf)
|
|
$
|
6.13
|
|
|
$
|
6.84
|
|
|
$
|
7.01
|
|
|
$
|
7.08
|
|
|
$
|
7.20
|
|
The enterprise value range for Encore yielded by the Encore
discounted cash flow analysis implied an equity value range for
Encore of $35.04 to $53.38 per share.
The enterprise value range for Denbury yielded by the Denbury
discounted cash flow analysis implied an equity value range for
Denbury of $13.95 to $19.48 per share, as compared to
Denburys closing stock price of $14.60 per share on
October 30, 2009.
The valuation of the merger consideration to be received by
Encores stockholders implied by the discounted cash flow
analysis for Denbury and the merger consideration, taken as the
Minimum Exchange Ratio plus cash consideration of $15.00 per
Encore share, implied an equity value range of $43.87 to $55.32
per Encore share. Barclays Capital noted that this implied
equity value range per Encore share was in line with the implied
equity value range per Encore share yielded by Barclays
Capitals discounted cash flow analysis for Encore.
Research
Analyst Price Targets
Barclays Capital evaluated the publicly available price targets
for Encore and Denbury published by independent equity research
analysts, as reported on Bloomberg on or about October 30,
2009. For each of Encore and Denbury, Barclays Capital reviewed
price targets published by eight independent equity research
analysts associated with various Wall Street firms. Barclays
Capitals analysis of research analyst price targets
implied an equity value range for Encore of $37.00 to $60.00 per
share, with a median and mean of $53.00 and $50.50 per share,
respectively. Barclays Capitals analysis of research
analyst price targets for Denbury implied an equity value range
for Denbury of $14.00 to $23.00 per share, with a median and
mean of $18.50 and $18.75 per share, respectively, as compared
to Denburys closing stock price of $14.60 per share on
October 30, 2009. The valuation of the merger consideration
to be received by Encores stockholders implied by the
analysis of research analyst price targets for Denbury and the
merger consideration, taken as the Minimum Exchange Ratio plus
cash consideration of $15.00 per Encore share, implied an equity
value range of $43.98 to $62.61 per Encore share. Barclays
Capital noted that this implied equity value range per Encore
share was in line with the implied equity value range per Encore
share yielded by Barclays Capitals research analyst price
target analysis for Encore.
72
General
Barclays Capital is an internationally recognized investment
banking firm and, as part of its investment banking activities,
is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and their
securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions,
investments for passive and control purposes, negotiated
underwritings, competitive bids, secondary distributions of
listed and unlisted securities, private placements and
valuations for estate, corporate and other purposes.
Encores board of directors selected Barclays Capital
because of its qualifications, reputation and experience in the
valuation of businesses and securities in connection with
mergers and acquisitions generally, as well as substantial
experience in transactions comparable to the merger and
familiarity with Encore specifically.
Barclays Capital is acting as financial advisor to Encore in
connection with the merger. As compensation for its services in
connection with the merger, Encore paid Barclays Capital
$1.0 million upon the delivery of Barclays Capitals
opinion. Additional compensation of $12.5 million will be
payable on completion of the merger against which the amounts
paid for the opinion will be credited. In the event the merger
does not occur, Barclays Capital will be entitled to receive a
fee equal to the lesser of (i) 10% of the
break-up,
termination or similar fees received by Encore and (ii) the
amount that would otherwise have been payable by Encore to
Barclays Capital if the merger had been consummated in
accordance with its terms, in either case, net of the fee paid
by Encore to Barclays Capital for the delivery of its opinion.
In addition, Encore has agreed to reimburse Barclays Capital for
its reasonable expenses incurred in connection with the merger
and to indemnify Barclays Capital for certain liabilities that
may arise out of its engagement by Encore and the rendering of
Barclays Capitals opinion. Barclays Capital has performed
various investment banking services for Encore and its
affiliates in the past and has received customary fees for such
services. Specifically, in the past two years, Barclays Capital
has performed the following investment banking and financial
services for Encore and its affiliates for which Barclays
Capital has received customary compensation: (i) in
September 2009, Barclays Capital acted as the sole underwriter
on Encores 2.75 million common share offering,
(ii) in June 2009, Barclays Capital acted as financial
advisor to Encores board of directors in connection with
its sale of certain oil and natural gas properties to ENP,
(iii) in June 2009, Barclays Capital acted as joint
bookrunner on ENPs 9.43 million common unit offering,
the proceeds of which were partially used to finance the
immediately aforementioned transaction, (iv) in May 2009,
Barclays Capital acted as financial advisor to Encores
board of directors in connection with Encores sale of
certain oil and natural gas properties to ENP, (v) in May
2009, Barclays Capital acted as joint bookrunner on ENPs
2.76 million common unit offering, the proceeds of which
were partially used to finance the immediately aforementioned
transaction, (vi) in December 2008, Barclays Capital acted
as financial advisor to Encores board of directors in
connection with its sale of certain natural gas properties to
ENP, and (vii) Barclays Capital is currently a lender under
ENPs existing revolving credit facility. Over the past two
years, Barclays Capital has not performed services for Denbury
for which Barclays Capital has received compensation. However,
Barclays Capital may perform investment banking and financial
services for Denbury and its affiliates in the future and, if it
does, would expect to receive customary fees for such services.
Barclays Capital is a full service securities firm engaged in a
wide range of businesses from investment and commercial banking,
lending, asset management and other financial and non-financial
services. In the ordinary course of its business, Barclays
Capital and its affiliates may actively trade and effect
transactions in the equity, debt
and/or other
securities (and any derivatives thereof) and financial
instruments (including loans and other obligations) of Encore
and Denbury and their affiliates for its own account and for the
accounts of its customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold
long or short positions and investments in such securities and
financial instruments.
Opinion
of Denburys Financial Advisor
Pursuant to an engagement letter dated October 30, 2009,
Denbury retained J.P. Morgan as its financial advisor in
connection with the proposed merger and to deliver a fairness
opinion in connection with the merger.
73
At the meeting of Denburys board of directors on
October 31, 2009, J.P. Morgan rendered its oral
opinion, subsequently confirmed in writing, to Denburys
board of directors that, as of that date and based upon and
subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in its opinion,
the consideration to be paid by Denbury in the proposed merger
was fair, from a financial point of view, to Denbury. No
limitations were imposed by Denburys board of directors
upon J.P. Morgan with respect to the investigations made or
procedures followed by it in rendering its opinion. The issuance
of J.P. Morgans opinion was approved by a fairness
opinion committee of J.P. Morgan on October 31, 2009.
The full text of the written opinion of J.P. Morgan
which sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made,
procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the
review undertaken by J.P. Morgan in connection with its
opinion, is attached as Annex C to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference.
Denbury stockholders are urged to read the opinion carefully and
in its entirety.
J.P. Morgan provided its advisory services and opinion for
the information and assistance of Denburys board of
directors in connection with its consideration of the proposed
merger. Neither its opinion nor the related analyses constituted
a recommendation of the proposed merger to Denburys board
of directors. The description of the J.P. Morgan opinion is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the
opinion set forth in Annex C. J.P. Morgans
written opinion is addressed to Denburys board of
directors and addresses only the fairness, from a financial
point of view, to Denbury of the consideration to be paid in
connection with the merger and does not address the underlying
decision by Denbury to enter into the merger. Moreover,
J.P. Morgan has expressed no opinion as to the price at
which Denburys common stock or Encores common stock
will trade at any future time. J.P. Morgan was not asked
to, and did not, recommend the specific consideration payable in
the merger, which consideration was determined through
negotiations between Denbury and Encore. The J.P. Morgan
opinion is not a recommendation as to how any holder of Denbury
common stock should vote with respect to the merger or any other
matter. J.P. Morgans opinion was one of many factors
taken into consideration by Denburys board of directors in
making its determination to approve the merger. Consequently,
J.P. Morgans analyses described below should not be
viewed as determinative of the decision of Denburys board
of directors with respect to the fairness, from a financial
point of view, of the consideration to be paid by Denbury in the
merger.
In arriving at its opinion, J.P. Morgan, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed a draft of the merger agreement dated October 31,
2009;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available business and financial
information concerning Encore and Denbury and the industry in
which they operate;
|
|
|
|
compared the financial and operating performance of Encore and
Denbury with publicly available information concerning certain
other companies J.P. Morgan deemed relevant and reviewed
the current and historical market prices of Encore common stock
and Denbury common stock and certain publicly traded securities
of such other companies;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain internal financial analyses and forecasts
prepared by or at the direction of the management teams of
Encore and Denbury relating to their respective businesses, as
well as the estimated amount and timing of the cost savings and
related expenses and synergies expected as a result of the
merger, referred to in this Opinion of Denburys
Financial Advisor as the Denbury Expected
Synergies;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain reserve reports prepared by independent
engineering firms and each respective company regarding the
proved, probable and possible reserves of Encore and Denbury
both on a risked and unrisked basis, referred to in this
Opinion of Denburys Financial Advisor as the
Reviewed Reserve Reports; and
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
performed such other financial studies and analyses and
considered such other information (including whether there were
any other transactions involving companies J.P. Morgan
deemed relevant) as J.P. Morgan deemed appropriate for the
purposes of its opinion.
|
J.P. Morgan also held discussions with certain members of
management of Denbury and Encore with respect to certain aspects
of the merger, and the past and current business operations of
Denbury and Encore, the financial condition and future prospects
and operations of Denbury and Encore, the effects of the merger
on the financial condition and future prospects of Denbury and
certain other matters J.P. Morgan believed necessary or
appropriate to its inquiry.
J.P. Morgan relied upon and assumed, without assuming
responsibility or liability for independent verification, the
accuracy and completeness of all information that was publicly
available or was furnished to or discussed with J.P. Morgan
by Encore and Denbury or otherwise reviewed by or for
J.P. Morgan. J.P. Morgan did not conduct and was not
provided with an independent valuation of the equity interest
owned by Encore in ENP and assumed that the value of such equity
interest was the value implied by the trading market value.
J.P. Morgan did not conduct, nor was it provided with, any
valuation or appraisal of any assets or liabilities (other than
its receipt of the Reviewed Reserve Reports), nor did
J.P. Morgan evaluate the solvency of Encore or Denbury
under any state or federal laws relating to bankruptcy,
insolvency or similar matters. In relying on financial analyses
and forecasts provided to J.P. Morgan or derived therefrom,
including the Reviewed Reserve Reports and the Denbury Expected
Synergies, J.P. Morgan was advised by the management teams
of Encore and Denbury, and J.P. Morgan assumed, at
Denburys direction, that they had been reasonably prepared
based on assumptions reflecting the best currently available
estimates and judgments by management as to the expected future
results of operations and financial condition of Encore and
Denbury to which such analyses or forecasts relate.
J.P. Morgan expressed no view as to such analyses or
forecasts (including the Reviewed Reserve Reports and the
Denbury Expected Synergies) or the assumptions on which they
were based. J.P. Morgan also assumed that the merger would
qualify as a tax-free reorganization for United States federal
income tax purposes and would be consummated as described in the
merger agreement and this joint proxy statement/prospectus and
that the definitive merger agreement would not differ in any
material respect from the draft of the merger agreement
furnished to, and reviewed by, J.P. Morgan.
J.P. Morgan also assumed that the representations and
warranties made by Denbury and Encore in the merger agreement
were and would be true and correct in all respects material to
J.P. Morgans analysis. J.P. Morgan further
assumed that all material governmental, regulatory or other
consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of the
merger would be obtained without any adverse effect on Encore or
Denbury or on the contemplated benefits of the merger.
The projections furnished to J.P. Morgan for Denbury and
Encore were prepared by the respective management teams of each
company. J.P. Morgan is not a legal, regulatory or tax
expert and has relied on the assessments made by advisors to
Denbury with respect to such issues. Neither Denbury nor Encore
publicly discloses internal management projections of the type
provided to J.P. Morgan in connection with
J.P. Morgans analysis of the merger and such
projections were not prepared with a view toward public
disclosure. These projections were based on numerous variables
and assumptions that are inherently uncertain and may be beyond
the control of management, including, without limitation,
factors related to general economic and competitive conditions
and prevailing interest rates. Accordingly, actual results could
vary significantly from those set forth in such projections.
J.P. Morgans opinion is based on economic, market and
other conditions as in effect on, and the information made
available to J.P. Morgan as of, the date of such opinion.
Subsequent developments may affect J.P. Morgans
opinion and J.P. Morgan does not have any obligation to
update, revise, or reaffirm such opinion.
J.P. Morgans opinion is limited to the fairness, from
a financial point of view, of the consideration to be paid by
Denbury in the proposed merger and J.P. Morgan has
expressed no opinion as to the fairness of the merger to, or any
consideration of, the holders of any class of securities,
creditors or other constituencies of Denbury or the underlying
decision by Denbury to engage in the merger. Furthermore,
J.P. Morgan expressed no opinion with respect to the amount
or nature of any compensation to any officers, directors or
employees of any party to the merger, or any class of such
persons relative to the consideration to be paid by Denbury in
the merger or with respect to the fairness of any such
compensation.
75
In accordance with customary investment banking practice,
J.P. Morgan employed generally accepted valuation methods
in reaching its opinion. The following is a summary of the
material financial analyses utilized by J.P. Morgan in
connection with providing its opinion and does not purport to be
a complete description of the analysis underlying
J.P. Morgans opinion or the presentations made by
J.P. Morgan to Denburys board of directors. Some of
the summaries of financial analyses are presented in tabular
format. In order to understand the financial analyses used by
J.P. Morgan more fully, you should read the tables together
with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not
constitute a complete description of J.P. Morgans
financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions
underlying the analyses, and if viewed in isolation could create
a misleading or incomplete view of the financial analyses
performed by J.P. Morgan.
Transaction
Overview
Based upon the closing price per share of Encore common stock of
$37.07 on October 30, 2009, which was the last trading day
prior to the public announcement of the merger, the exchange
ratio of 2.3179 shares of Denbury common stock per share of
Encore common stock (which assumes a Denbury stock price of
$15.10 per share, the midpoint of the collar), and the cash
consideration of $15.00 per share of Encore common stock,
J.P. Morgan noted that the implied aggregate value of the
consideration to be paid by Denbury in the merger as of
October 30, 2009 was approximately $2.829 billion, or
approximately $50.00 per share of Encore common stock, subject
to certain rounding and adjustments as provided for in the
merger agreement.
Encore
Analyses
Historical Share Price Analysis. J.P. Morgan
noted that the low and high prices per share of Encore common
stock during the 52-week period ending on October 30, 2009
were approximately $17.04 and $45.63, compared to the closing
price per share of Encore common stock of $37.07 on
October 30, 2009.
Selected Companies Analysis. Using publicly
available information and information provided by Encore
management, J.P. Morgan compared selected financial and
market data of Encore with the corresponding data for the
following publicly traded companies, which are referred to as
the Selected Companies:
Continental Resources, Inc.;
Pioneer Natural Resources Company;
Whiting Petroleum Corporation;
Plains Exploration & Production Company;
Concho Resources Inc.;
Arena Resources Inc.; and
Berry Petroleum Company.
In its analysis, J.P. Morgan calculated and compared
various financial multiples, based on such publicly available
information and information provided by Encore management, for
Encore and the Selected Companies, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
the firm value as a multiple of Institutional Broker Estimate
System, which is referred to herein as IBES,
consensus estimates for earnings before interest, income taxes,
depletion, depreciation and amortization and exploration
expenses, or EBITDAX, for calendar year 2010, which is referred
to below as FV/IBES 2010E EBITDAX;
|
|
|
|
the firm value as a multiple of Encore management estimated
earnings before interest, income taxes, depletion, depreciation
and amortization and exploration expenses, or EBITDAX, for 2010,
which is referred to below as FV/Mgmt 2010E EBITDAX;
|
|
|
|
the equity value as a multiple of IBES consensus estimates for
cash flow for 2010, which is referred to below as EV/IBES
2010E Cash Flow;
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
the equity value as a multiple of Encore management estimated
cash flow for 2010, which is referred to below as EV/Mgmt
2010E Cash Flow; and
|
|
|
|
the firm value based on proved reserves in millions of barrels
of oil equivalents as of December 31, 2008, reflecting
certain adjustments made by Denbury management, which is
referred to below as
FV/Reserves.
|
This analysis indicated the following:
Selected
Companies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benchmark
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
FV/IBES 2010E EBITDAX
|
|
|
13.6
|
x
|
|
|
5.3
|
x
|
|
|
8.0
|
x
|
|
|
6.4
|
x
|
EV/IBES 2010E Cash Flow
|
|
|
11.9
|
x
|
|
|
4.4
|
x
|
|
|
7.0
|
x
|
|
|
6.2
|
x
|
FV/Reserves
|
|
$
|
46.20
|
|
|
$
|
8.42
|
|
|
$
|
22.28
|
|
|
$
|
21.25
|
|
Using a reference range of 7.5x to 8.5x Encores FV/IBES
2010E EBITDAX, 7.5x to 8.5x Encores
FV/Mgmt
2010E EBITDAX, 5.5x to 7.0x Encores EV/IBES 2010E Cash
Flow, 5.5x to 7.0x Encores EV/Mgmt 2010E Cash Flow and
$18.00 to $22.00 per barrel of oil equivalent of Encore,
J.P. Morgan determined a range of implied equity values.
This analysis indicated a range of implied values per share of
Encores common stock of approximately $40.87 to $50.29
using Encores FV/IBES 2010E EBITDAX, $43.75 to $53.54
using Encores FV/Mgmt 2010E EBITDAX, $41.42 to $52.71
using Encores EV/IBES 2010E Cash Flow, $41.19 to $52.42
using Encores EV/Mgmt 2010E Cash Flow and $44.70 to $61.24
using Encores FV/Reserves.
It should be noted that no Selected Company utilized in the
analysis above is identical to Encore.
Net Asset Valuation. J.P. Morgan performed its
analyses of Encore based on two primary sets of assumptions for
a net asset valuation: (1) a set of assumptions developed
assuming that Encore remained as a standalone entity without
giving effect to the proposed merger or any Denbury Expected
Synergies; and (2) a set of assumptions developed assuming
that Encore was merged into Denbury and taking into account any
Denbury Expected Synergies. J.P. Morgan compared each of
these scenarios to a net asset valuation analysis of Denbury.
J.P. Morgan performed its analysis based on a variety of
data sources provided by Encores management, including
financial projections, economic models and the Reviewed Reserve
Report of Encore, which were discussed with Denburys
management, and certain other publicly available information.
J.P. Morgan assumed forecasted commodity prices based on
publicly available trading prices on the New York Mercantile
Exchange through 2013 and flat commodity prices based on the
publicly available 2013 trading prices thereafter.
J.P. Morgan assumed that the value of the equity interest
owned by Encore in ENP was the value implied by the trading
market value. The production and realized prices were netted
against estimated future operating expenses and capital
expenditures to derive the cash flows for Encore. These cash
flows were discounted using after-tax discount rates ranging
from 8.0% to 10.0%. The range of after-tax discount rates used
by J.P. Morgan in its analysis was estimated using
traditional investment banking methodology, including the
analysis of selected publicly traded companies engaged in
businesses that J.P. Morgan deemed relevant to
Encores businesses.
Based on the assumptions set forth above, this analysis
indicated a range of implied values per share of Encore common
stock of approximately $48.42 to $61.07 on a standalone basis
without giving effect to the proposed merger or any Denbury
Expected Synergies and $50.66 to $65.55 on a pro forma basis
after giving effect to the proposed merger and any Denbury
Expected Synergies.
Denbury
Analyses
Historical Share Price Analysis. J.P. Morgan
noted that the low and high closing prices per share of Denbury
common stock during the 52-week period ending on
October 30, 2009 were approximately $5.59 and $18.84,
compared to the closing price per share of Denbury common stock
of $14.60 on October 30, 2009.
77
Selected Companies Analysis. Using publicly
available information and information provided by Denbury
management, J.P. Morgan compared selected financial and
market data of Denbury with the corresponding data for the
Selected Companies. In its analysis, J.P. Morgan calculated
and compared various financial multiples, based on such publicly
available information and information provided by Denbury
management, for Denbury and the Selected Companies, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
the firm value as a multiple of IBES consensus estimates for
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and
exploration expenses, or EBITDAX, for calendar year 2010, which
is referred to below as FV/IBES 2010E EBITDAX;
|
|
|
|
the firm value as a multiple of Denbury management estimated
earnings before interest, income taxes, depletion, depreciation
and amortization and exploration expenses, or EBITDAX, for
calendar year 2010, which is referred to below as FV/Mgmt
2010E EBITDAX;
|
|
|
|
the equity value as a multiple of IBES consensus estimates for
cash flow for calendar year 2010, which is referred to below as
EV/IBES 2010E Cash Flow;
|
|
|
|
the equity value as a multiple of Denbury management estimated
cash flow for calendar year 2010, which is referred to below as
EV/Mgmt 2010E Cash Flow; and
|
|
|
|
the firm value based on proved reserves in millions of barrels
of oil equivalents as of December 31, 2008, which is
referred to below as FV/Reserves.
|
This analysis indicated the following:
Selected
Companies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benchmark
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
FV/IBES 2010E EBITDAX
|
|
|
13.6
|
x
|
|
|
5.3
|
x
|
|
|
8.0
|
x
|
|
|
6.4
|
x
|
EV/IBES 2010E Cash Flow
|
|
|
11.9
|
x
|
|
|
4.4
|
x
|
|
|
7.0
|
x
|
|
|
6.2
|
x
|
FV/Reserves
|
|
$
|
46.20
|
|
|
$
|
8.42
|
|
|
$
|
22.28
|
|
|
$
|
21.25
|
|
Using a reference range of 8.5x to 9.5x Denburys FV/IBES
2010E EBITDAX, 8.5x to 9.5x Denburys FV/Mgmt 2010E
EBITDAX, 7.0x to 8.5x Denburys EV/IBES 2010E Cash Flow,
7.0x to 8.5x Denburys
EV/Mgmt
2010E Cash Flow and $21.00 to $25.00 per barrel of oil
equivalent of Denbury, J.P. Morgan determined a range of
implied equity values. This analysis indicated a range of
implied values per share of Denburys common stock of
approximately $14.57 to $16.83 using Denburys FV/IBES
2010E EBITDAX, $14.10 to $16.30 using Denburys FV/Mgmt
2010E EBITDAX, $13.58 to $16.49 using Denburys EV/IBES
2010E Cash Flow, $13.84 to $16.80 using Denburys EV/Mgmt
2010E Cash Flow and $13.68 to $17.05 using Denburys
FV/Reserves.
It should be noted that no Selected Company utilized in the
analysis above is identical to Denbury.
Net Asset Valuation. J.P. Morgan conducted a
net asset valuation analysis of Denbury. J.P. Morgan
performed its analysis based on a variety of data sources
provided by Denburys management, including financial
projections, economic models and the Reviewed Reserve Report of
Denbury, which were discussed with and approved by
Denburys management, and certain other publicly available
information. J.P. Morgan assumed forecasted commodity
prices based on publicly available trading prices on the New
York Mercantile Exchange through 2013 and flat commodity prices
based on the publicly available 2013 trading prices thereafter.
The production and realized prices were netted against estimated
future operating expenses and capital expenditures to derive the
cash flows for Denbury. These cash flows were discounted using
after-tax discount rates ranging from 8.0% to 10.0%. The range
of after-tax discount rates used by J.P. Morgan in its
analysis was estimated using traditional investment banking
methodology, including the analysis of selected publicly traded
companies engaged in businesses that J.P. Morgan deemed
relevant to Denburys businesses.
Based on the assumptions set forth above, this analysis
indicated a range of implied values per share of Denbury common
stock of approximately $17.09 to $20.33.
78
Relative
Valuation Analysis
Based upon the implied valuations for each of Encore and Denbury
derived as described above under Encore
Analyses Selected Companies Analysis,
Encore Analyses Net Asset Valuation,
Denbury Analyses Selected Companies
Analysis and Denbury Analyses Net Asset
Valuation, J.P. Morgan calculated a range of implied
exchange ratios of a share of Encore common stock to a share of
Denbury common stock, exclusive of the cash consideration to be
paid for a share of Encore common stock, and then compared that
range of implied exchange ratios to the exchange ratio in the
merger of 2.3179 shares of Denbury common stock per share
of Encore common stock, as well as the maximum and minimum
exchange ratios that may be applicable under the circumstances
provided for in the merger agreement.
For each of the analyses referred to above, J.P. Morgan
calculated the ratio implied by dividing the low end of each
implied equity value of Encore, less the aggregate amount of
cash to be paid in the merger, by the high end of each implied
equity value of Denbury. J.P. Morgan also calculated the
ratio implied by dividing the high end of each implied equity
value of Encore, less the aggregate amount of cash to be paid in
the merger, by the low end of each implied equity value of
Denbury.
This analysis indicated the following implied exchange ratios
(rounded to the nearest thousand), compared in each case to the
exchange ratio in the merger of 2.3179 shares of Denbury
common stock per share of Encore common stock, as well as the
maximum and minimum exchange ratios that may be applicable under
the circumstances provided for in the merger agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of
|
|
|
|
Implied
|
|
Comparison
|
|
Exchange Ratios
|
|
|
Selected Companies Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
FV/IBES 2010E EBITDAX
|
|
|
1.537x 2.422
|
x
|
FV/Mgmt 2010E EBITDAX
|
|
|
1.764x 2.733
|
x
|
EV/IBES 2010E Cash Flow
|
|
|
1.602x 2.777
|
x
|
EV/Mgmt 2010E Cash Flow
|
|
|
1.559x 2.704
|
x
|
FV/Reserves
|
|
|
1.742x 3.380
|
x
|
Net Asset Valuation Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Valuation without Denbury Expected Synergies
|
|
|
1.644x 2.696
|
x
|
Net Asset Valuation with Denbury Expected Synergies
|
|
|
1.754x 2.958
|
x
|
Miscellaneous
The foregoing summary of certain material financial analyses
does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses or
data presented by J.P. Morgan. The preparation of a
fairness opinion is a complex process involving various
determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods
of financial analysis and the application of those methods to
the particular circumstances and, therefore, is not readily
susceptible to partial analysis or summary description.
J.P. Morgan believes that the foregoing summary and its
analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting
portions of the foregoing summary and these analyses, without
considering all of its analyses as a whole, could create an
incomplete view of the processes underlying the analyses and its
opinion. In arriving at its opinion, J.P. Morgan did not
attribute any particular weight to any analyses or factors
considered by it and did not form an opinion as to whether any
individual analysis or factor (positive or negative), considered
in isolation, supported or failed to support its opinion.
Rather, J.P. Morgan considered the totality of the factors
and analyses performed in determining its opinion and made its
determination as to fairness based on its professional judgment
and after considering the results of all of its analyses.
J.P. Morgan based its analyses on assumptions that it
deemed reasonable, including those concerning general business,
economic, market and financial conditions, industry-specific
factors and other matters. Analyses based upon forecasts of
future results are inherently uncertain, as they are subject to
numerous factors or events beyond the control of the parties and
their advisors. Accordingly, forecasts and analyses used or made
by J.P. Morgan are not necessarily indicative of actual
future results, which may be significantly more or less
favorable than suggested by those analyses. Moreover,
J.P. Morgans analyses are
79
not and do not purport to be appraisals or otherwise reflective
of the prices at which businesses actually could be bought or
sold. None of the Selected Companies reviewed as described in
the above summary is identical to Encore or Denbury. However,
the companies selected were chosen because they are publicly
traded companies with operations and businesses that, for
purposes of J.P. Morgans analysis, may be considered
similar to those of Encore or Denbury. The analyses
necessarily involve complex considerations and judgments
concerning differences in financial and operational
characteristics of the companies involved and other factors that
could affect the companies compared to Encore or Denbury.
The terms of the merger were determined through negotiations
between Encore and Denbury and were approved by Denburys
board of directors. Although J.P. Morgan provided advice to
Denbury during the course of the negotiations, the decision to
enter into the merger was solely that of Denburys board of
directors. As described above, the presentation and opinion of
J.P. Morgan was only one of a number of factors taken into
consideration by Denburys board of directors in making its
determination to approve and enter into the merger.
As a part of its investment banking business, J.P. Morgan
and its affiliates are continually engaged in the valuation of
businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and
acquisitions, investments for passive and control purposes,
negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and
unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for
estate, corporate and other purposes. J.P. Morgan was
selected to advise Denbury with respect to the merger on the
basis of such experience and its familiarity with Denbury.
For services rendered in connection with the merger, Denbury has
agreed to pay J.P. Morgan $12.0 million,
$3.0 million of which was paid after the public
announcement of the proposed merger, and the remainder of which
will become payable only if the merger is consummated. In
addition, Denbury has agreed to reimburse J.P. Morgan for
its expenses incurred in connection with its services, including
the fees and disbursements of counsel, and will indemnify
J.P. Morgan against certain liabilities, including
liabilities arising under the Federal securities laws.
During the two years preceding the date of its opinion,
J.P. Morgan and its affiliates have had commercial or
investment banking relationships with Denbury and its affiliates
and with ENP for which it and those of its affiliates have
received customary compensation. Those services during that
period have included acting as financial advisor on the sale of
certain Denbury assets in July 2009, as lead bookrunner on
Denburys offering of high yield debt securities in
February 2009 and acting as co-managing underwriter on a
follow-on equity offering for ENP in June 2009. In addition,
J.P. Morgans commercial banking affiliate is an agent
bank and a lender under outstanding credit facilities of Denbury
and a lender under outstanding credit facilities of Encore for
which it receives customary compensation or other financial
benefits. It is anticipated that J.P. Morgan and its
affiliates will arrange
and/or
provide financing to Denbury in connection with the merger which
will result in the payment of customary compensation. In the
ordinary course of their businesses, J.P. Morgan and its
affiliates may actively trade the debt and equity securities of
Denbury or Encore for their own accounts or for the accounts of
customers and, accordingly, they may at any time hold long or
short positions in those securities.
Denbury considered the potential conflict of interest posed by
J.P. Morgan and its affiliates having multiple roles in
connection with the merger, and determined that circumstance
would not interfere with J.P. Morgans performance of its
investment banking services in connection with the merger.
Accounting
Treatment
The merger will be accounted for as an acquisition of Encore by
Denbury using the acquisition method of accounting.
Denbury will fair value the consideration transferred pursuant
to the acquisition method of accounting, which in the case of
the Denbury common shares, will be the closing price of the
stock on the acquisition closing date. Goodwill is measured as
the excess of the fair value of the consideration transferred
plus the fair value of the noncontrolling interest of ENP, over
the acquisition-date fair value of the assets acquired less the
fair value of liabilities assumed. Denbury will include
Encores results of operations subsequent to the
acquisition closing date. Encore uses the successful efforts
method of accounting for oil and natural gas properties. Under
this method, all costs associated with productive and
nonproductive development
80
wells are capitalized. Exploration expenses, including
geological and geophysical expenses and delay rentals, are
charged to expense as incurred. Costs associated with drilling
exploratory wells are initially capitalized pending
determination of whether the well is economically productive or
nonproductive. Proved property costs are amortized on a
unit-of-production
basis over total proved reserves and costs of wells, related
equipment and facilities are depreciated over the life of the
proved developed reserves that will utilize those capitalized
assets on a
field-by-field
basis. Denbury uses, and will continue to use post-merger, the
full cost method of accounting for its oil and gas properties.
Under this method, all costs related to the acquisition,
exploration and development of oil and natural gas reserves are
capitalized and accumulated in a single cost center relating to
those activities. Those costs include lease acquisition costs,
geological and geophysical expenditures, delay rentals on
undeveloped properties, costs of drilling both productive and
nonproductive wells, and general and administrative expenses
directly related to exploration and development activities.
Proceeds received from dispositions are credited against
accumulated costs except where the sale represents a significant
disposition of reserves, in which case a gain or loss is
recognized. Property acquisition costs and costs of wells,
related equipment and facilities and future development costs
are included in a single full cost pool, which is amortized on a
unit-of-production
basis over total proved reserves.
Delisting
and Deregistration of Encore Common Stock
If the merger is completed, Encore common stock will be delisted
from the New York Stock Exchange and deregistered under the
Exchange Act.
Restrictions
on Sales of Shares of Denbury Common Stock Received in the
Merger
The shares of Denbury common stock to be issued in connection
with the merger will be registered under the Securities Act and
will be freely transferable, except for shares of Denbury common
stock issued to any person who is deemed to be an
affiliate of Denbury after the effective time of the
merger. Encore stockholders who become affiliates of Denbury as
a result of the merger may not sell any of the shares of Denbury
common stock received by them in connection with the merger
except pursuant to an effective registration statement under the
Securities Act covering the resale of those shares or any
applicable exemption under Rule 144 or otherwise under the
Securities Act.
Opinions
as to Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger
It is a condition to the closing of the merger that
Baker & Hostetler LLP and Baker Botts L.L.P. deliver
opinions, effective as of the date of closing, to Denbury and
Encore, respectively, to the effect that (i) the merger
will be treated for United States federal income tax purposes as
a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code and (ii) each of Denbury
and Encore will be a party to the reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code.
Each opinion will be based on certain factual representations
and certifications contained in certificates signed by duly
authorized officers of Denbury and Encore to be delivered at
closing. An opinion of counsel represents counsels best
legal judgment and is not binding on the Internal Revenue
Service, and there can be no assurance that following the merger
the Internal Revenue Service will not challenge the legal
conclusions expressed in the opinions. Please review carefully
the information under the caption Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
for a description of the material United States federal income
tax consequences of the merger.
Board of
Directors and Management of Denbury Following the
Merger
Denburys board of directors and executive officers will
remain the same following the merger as they are immediately
before the merger becomes effective.
Interests
of Certain Persons in the Merger that May be Different from Your
Interests
In considering the recommendation of Encores board of
directors with respect to the merger, Encore stockholders should
be aware that the executive officers and directors of Encore
have certain interests in the
81
merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the
interests of Encore stockholders. Encores board of
directors was aware of these interests and considered them,
among other matters, when adopting a resolution to approve the
merger agreement and recommending that Encore stockholders vote
to adopt the merger agreement. These interests are summarized
below.
Treatment
of Equity Awards
The merger agreement provides that each option to purchase
shares of Encore common stock that is outstanding immediately
prior to the completion of the merger, whether or not then
exercisable or vested, will be converted into an obligation of
Denbury to make a cash payment to the option holder equal to the
product of (i) the number of shares of Encore common stock
subject to such option and (ii) the excess, if any, of the
aggregate merger consideration per share (or with respect to
certain pre-2005 options, the highest price per share paid
within 60 days prior to the merger) over the exercise price
per share previously subject to such option. See Terms of
the Merger Agreement Employee Stock Options;
Restricted Shares. In addition, the merger agreement
provides that each outstanding award of restricted stock granted
by Encore (other than awards granted as part of annual incentive
compensation with respect to calendar year 2009) will
become fully vested and each holder will have the right to make
the same elections as described above in Terms of the
Merger Agreement Conversion of Encore Stock,
except that any shares of Encore restricted stock granted as a
2009 bonus pursuant to the Encore annual incentive program will
be converted into restricted shares of Denbury common stock as
described below in Annual Incentive
Programs.
The following table sets forth information concerning options
relating to Encore common stock and restricted stock held by
Encores executive officers and directors as of
February 3, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Unvested
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Option Exercise
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
Name and Title
|
|
Options(1)
|
|
|
Price ($)
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
I. Jon Brumley
|
|
|
44,357
|
|
|
|
9.3333
|
|
|
|
96,833
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
8.4000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,644
|
|
|
|
12.4000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,361
|
|
|
|
17.1733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,827
|
|
|
|
30.5500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jon S. Brumley
|
|
|
68,500
|
|
|
|
9.3333
|
|
|
|
90,042
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
8.4000
|
|
|
|
|
|
President
|
|
|
58,065
|
|
|
|
12.4000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,464
|
|
|
|
17.1733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,269
|
|
|
|
26.5467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,949
|
|
|
|
31.1000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,563
|
|
|
|
25.7300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,088
|
|
|
|
30.5500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert C. Reeves
|
|
|
10,179
|
|
|
|
9.3333
|
|
|
|
35,986
|
|
Senior Vice President,
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
8.4000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer,
|
|
|
15,483
|
|
|
|
12.4000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasurer, and
|
|
|
12,448
|
|
|
|
17.1733
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Secretary
|
|
|
5,040
|
|
|
|
26.5467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,134
|
|
|
|
31.1000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,041
|
|
|
|
25.7300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,571
|
|
|
|
30.5500
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Ben Nivens
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
12.4000
|
|
|
|
32,109
|
|
Senior Vice President and
|
|
|
809
|
|
|
|
13.6067
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
26.5467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,705
|
|
|
|
31.1000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,441
|
|
|
|
25.7300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,374
|
|
|
|
30.5500
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Unvested
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Option Exercise
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
Name and Title
|
|
Options(1)
|
|
|
Price ($)
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
John W. Arms
|
|
|
13,125
|
|
|
|
9.3333
|
|
|
|
28,903
|
|
Senior Vice President,
|
|
|
8,475
|
|
|
|
8.4000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
7,741
|
|
|
|
12.4000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,979
|
|
|
|
17.1733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,040
|
|
|
|
26.5467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,849
|
|
|
|
31.1000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,441
|
|
|
|
25.7300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,151
|
|
|
|
30.5500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Treadway
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
9.3333
|
|
|
|
30,704
|
|
Senior Vice President,
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
|
8.4000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
10,398
|
|
|
|
12.4000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,203
|
|
|
|
17.1733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,360
|
|
|
|
26.5467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,849
|
|
|
|
31.1000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,841
|
|
|
|
25.7300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,209
|
|
|
|
33.7600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,262
|
|
|
|
30.5500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas H. Olle
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
9.3600
|
|
|
|
20,304
|
|
Vice President,
|
|
|
15,483
|
|
|
|
12.4000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic Solutions
|
|
|
31,120
|
|
|
|
17.1733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,050
|
|
|
|
26.5467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,127
|
|
|
|
31.1000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,961
|
|
|
|
25.7300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,365
|
|
|
|
33.7600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,009
|
|
|
|
30.5500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andy R. Lowe
|
|
|
3,638
|
|
|
|
25.7300
|
|
|
|
10,505
|
|
Vice President,
|
|
|
6,464
|
|
|
|
33.7600
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
4,976
|
|
|
|
30.5500
|
|
|
|
|
|
John A. Bailey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin C. Bowen
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
19.7667
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ted Collins, Jr.
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
8.9800
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
Director
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
11.4933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
19.7667
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ted A. Gardner
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
11.4933
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
Director
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
19.7667
|
|
|
|
|
|
John V. Genova
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
19.7667
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James A. Winne III
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
8.9800
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
Director
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
11.4933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
19.7667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Grants prior to July 2005 have been adjusted to reflect
Encores
three-for-two
stock split in July 2005. |
Annual
Incentive Programs
With respect to 2009, Encore may pay to employees eligible to
participate in Encores annual incentive program, including
the executive officers, a cash bonus at the participants
target annual cash incentive opportunity. The merger agreement
also allows Encore to grant restricted shares of Encore common
stock to certain employees under the Encore 2008 Incentive Stock
Plan with respect to their performance in 2009. Those grants
will be made upon the earlier of the time that annual incentive
bonuses for 2009 would be paid in the ordinary course of
business or immediately prior to the effective time of the
merger. The merger agreement provides that those restricted
shares will not vest as of the effective time of the merger, but
will be converted into a number of shares of Denbury restricted
stock determined by multiplying (i) the number of
restricted shares of Encore common stock subject to that grant
by (ii) the exchange ratio used in determining
83
the consideration payable to Encore stockholders who have
elected to receive only common stock consideration. However,
these restricted shares will vest if the Encore employee is
terminated without cause or resigns for good
reason, as such terms are defined in Encores
Employee Severance Protection Plan (see
Termination of Employment and Change of
Control Arrangements), on or after the date of the merger.
The following table sets forth the target cash and equity bonus
amounts for Encores executive officers that will be paid
or granted at the customary time consistent with Encores
past practices (February 2010) or, if earlier, upon the
closing of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Jon
|
|
|
Jon S.
|
|
|
Robert C.
|
|
|
L. Ben
|
|
|
John W.
|
|
|
Kevin
|
|
|
Thomas H.
|
|
|
Andy R.
|
|
|
|
Brumley
|
|
|
Brumley
|
|
|
Reeves
|
|
|
Nivens
|
|
|
Arms
|
|
|
Treadway
|
|
|
Olle
|
|
|
Lowe
|
|
|
2009 Annual Cash Bonus
|
|
$
|
772,600
|
|
|
$
|
1,545,000
|
|
|
$
|
648,900
|
|
|
$
|
741,600
|
|
|
$
|
418,500
|
|
|
$
|
360,500
|
|
|
$
|
150,670
|
|
|
$
|
127,205
|
|
2009 Annual Equity Bonus(1)
|
|
|
2,317,800
|
|
|
|
4,635,000
|
|
|
|
1,946,700
|
|
|
|
2,224,800
|
|
|
|
1,255,500
|
|
|
|
1,081,500
|
|
|
|
452,010
|
|
|
|
381,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,090,400
|
|
|
$
|
6,180,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,595,600
|
|
|
$
|
2,966,400
|
|
|
$
|
1,674,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,442,000
|
|
|
$
|
602,680
|
|
|
$
|
508,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The value of the 2009 Annual Equity Bonus will be divided by the
market value of Encores common stock as of the date the
2009 annual equity bonus is granted to determine the number of
restricted shares of Encore common stock that will be granted to
each executive officer. The grants are expected to be made on
terms and conditions, including performance conditions,
consistent with prior annual grants of restricted stock, and
will vest over a
4-year
period, subject to earlier vesting on termination without cause
or for good reason, as described above. |
The merger agreement provides for the payment of an additional
discretionary cash bonus with respect to 2009 to any officer of
Encore (other than Jon S. Brumley) in an amount determined by
the Compensation Committee of Encores board of directors
in its sole discretion. However, the aggregate amount of such
discretionary cash bonuses will not exceed $1,000,000 and will
not be included in calculating an officers target annual
incentive opportunity.
With respect to 2010, the target annual incentive opportunity
for each participant, including the executive officers, in one
of Encores annual incentive programs will be the same as
that employees target for 2009. Any such participant who
is terminated in the ordinary course without cause or resigns
for good reason following the effective time of the merger and
prior to the date on which Denbury pays annual bonuses to its
employees for 2010 will receive a bonus payout for 2010 in a pro
rated amount at least equal to such participants target
annual incentive opportunity (including for this purpose the
cash equivalent of any options or restricted stock that would
have been payable in respect of performance during 2010).
The merger agreement also provides that any participant in one
of Encores annual incentive programs who remains employed
by Denbury or an affiliate for 30 days following the
effective time of the merger will be entitled to receive an
award from Denbury consistent with awards granted to similarly
situated Denbury employees in accordance with Denburys
past practices. Encores named executive officers will not
be retained as employees of Denbury following the effective time
of the merger.
Termination
of Employment and Change of Control Arrangements
The stockholder approval of the merger will be considered a
change of control under Encores Employee
Severance Protection Plan, which provides all of Encores
full-time employees with severance payments and benefits upon
certain terminations of employment occurring between
90 days prior to, and two years following, a change of
control. Encores plan is considered a
double-trigger plan that requires not only a change
of control but also a termination of employment. If, during that
time period, an executive officer is involuntarily terminated by
Encore or its successor other than for cause or he resigns for
good reason, the officer will receive the following:
|
|
|
|
|
cash equal to 2-3 times annual salary and bonus;
|
|
|
|
continued medical, dental and life insurance coverage for up to
three years; and
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
an additional amount to gross up for the amount, if
any, of excise tax payable by the officer under the golden
parachute provisions of the Code such that after payment of
excise and income taxes on the gross up payment, the officer
will retain an amount sufficient to cover the excise tax.
|
The term cause means the employee has
(i) committed any fraud, theft or other dishonesty or
willful misconduct that results in significant loss to Encore,
(ii) been convicted of or pled guilty to a felony or
(iii) competed against Encore, misappropriated a material
opportunity of Encore or secured or attempted to secure a
significant personal benefit not fully disclosed and approved in
accordance with Encores policies and procedures in
connection with any transaction of, or on behalf of, Encore.
The term good reason means, for
Messrs. Brumley, Brumley, Reeves and Nivens, material
diminution in base compensation, material diminution in
authority, duties or responsibilities, material diminution in
responsibility of supervisor, material diminution in budget
authority, material change in the geographic location of
employment or any other material breach of the Employee
Severance Protection Plan, but in all events the executive must
come forward within 90 days of the occurrence of such event
and give the company 30 days to cure the condition. For
Messrs. Arms, Treadway, Olle and Love, the term resignation
for good reason means resignation within
30 days of any of the following: (i) any change in
titles, duties or responsibilities, (ii) any reduction in
compensation level in effect immediately prior to the merger
with respect to base salary, cash and non-cash perquisites,
bonus and incentive program eligibility and payout potential,
including stock option and restricted stock awards, and welfare
plans, including medical insurance, life insurance and
disability insurance, (iii) the relocation of place of
employment to a location more than 50 miles from his office
location immediately prior to the merger or (iv) any
failure by Denbury to comply with any of the provisions of
Encores Employee Severance Protection Plan, other than a
failure not occurring in bad faith and which is cured by Denbury
promptly after receipt of notice thereof given by the
participant.
Other
Triggers Under Incentive Arrangements
The incentive arrangements of Encores executive officers
provide for payments and other benefits (in some cases in
different amounts than described above) to the executives under
other circumstances (whether or not a change of control has
occurred), including death or disability or normal retirement.
Estimated
Termination Payments Upon a Change of Control of
Encore
The following table shows the potential payments to
Encores executive officers under Encores Employee
Severance Protection Plan and the relevant incentive plans,
assuming that the effective time of the merger is March 15,
2010 and the employee is involuntarily terminated or resigns for
good reason on that date. Termination on a different date may
result in different amounts payable to an executive officer.
Encores named executive officers (Messrs. I. Jon Brumley,
Jon S. Brumley, Reeves, Nivens and Arms) will not be retained as
employees of Denbury after the consummation of the merger.
Please refer to Treatment of Equity
Awards above for information on the vesting or conversion
of stock options and restricted stock held by Encores
executive officers and directors in connection with the merger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Jon
|
|
|
Jon S.
|
|
|
Robert C.
|
|
|
L. Ben
|
|
|
John W.
|
|
|
Kevin
|
|
|
Thomas H.
|
|
|
Andy R.
|
|
|
|
Brumley
|
|
|
Brumley
|
|
|
Reeves
|
|
|
Nivens
|
|
|
Arms
|
|
|
Treadway
|
|
|
Olle
|
|
|
Lowe
|
|
|
Cash Severance(1)
|
|
$
|
2,317,800
|
|
|
$
|
5,407,500
|
|
|
$
|
2,039,400
|
|
|
$
|
2,224,800
|
|
|
$
|
1,506,600
|
|
|
$
|
1,946,700
|
|
|
$
|
764,940
|
|
|
$
|
645,810
|
|
Pro-rata 2010 Bonus(2)
|
|
|
626,476
|
|
|
|
1,252,789
|
|
|
|
526,171
|
|
|
|
601,339
|
|
|
|
339,348
|
|
|
|
292,317
|
|
|
|
122,173
|
|
|
|
103,146
|
|
Insurance Coverage(3)
|
|
|
66,104
|
|
|
|
67,603
|
|
|
|
67,603
|
|
|
|
31,265
|
|
|
|
67,231
|
|
|
|
67,231
|
|
|
|
67,603
|
|
|
|
67,603
|
|
Stock Options(4)
|
|
|
360,837
|
|
|
|
649,475
|
|
|
|
305,638
|
|
|
|
303,090
|
|
|
|
248,338
|
|
|
|
280,229
|
|
|
|
110,233
|
|
|
|
99,514
|
|
Restricted Stock(5)
|
|
|
1,699,450
|
|
|
|
2,405,650
|
|
|
|
1,121,350
|
|
|
|
1,053,000
|
|
|
|
889,100
|
|
|
|
973,650
|
|
|
|
454,550
|
|
|
|
358,500
|
|
2009 Annual Equity Bonus(6)
|
|
|
2,317,800
|
|
|
|
4,635,000
|
|
|
|
1,946,700
|
|
|
|
2,224,800
|
|
|
|
1,255,500
|
|
|
|
1,081,500
|
|
|
|
452,010
|
|
|
|
381,615
|
|
Tax Gross Up
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,723,385
|
|
|
|
1,897,993
|
|
|
|
2,153,644
|
|
|
|
1,293,061
|
|
|
|
1,444,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
462,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,388,467
|
|
|
$
|
19,141,402
|
|
|
$
|
7,904,855
|
|
|
$
|
8,591,938
|
|
|
$
|
5,599,178
|
|
|
$
|
6,086,043
|
|
|
$
|
1,971,509
|
|
|
$
|
2,118,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The executive officers are entitled to a cash severance amount
equal to a multiple of the sum of their annual base salary and
annual cash bonus paid in respect of 2009. The multiple for
Kevin Treadway is 3.0, the multiple for Jon S. Brumley is 2.5
and the multiple for the other executive officers is 2.0. |
|
(2) |
|
Upon termination without cause or resignation for good reason
following the effective time of the merger, the merger agreement
provides that the executive officers are entitled to a pro-rated
2010 bonus based on the portion of 2010 during which the officer
is employed and the sum of the officers target annual cash
bonus and target annual equity bonus. |
|
(3) |
|
The executive officers are entitled to continued coverage for
three years under the Encore medical, dental and life insurance
arrangements. |
|
(4) |
|
Option awards will automatically vest upon the effective time of
the merger and will be converted into an obligation of Denbury
to make a cash payment to the option holder equal to the product
of (i) the number of shares of Encore common stock subject
to such option and (ii) the excess, if any, of the
aggregate consideration per share (or with respect to certain
pre-2005 options, the highest price per share paid within
60 days prior to the merger) over the exercise price per
share previously subject to such option. Amounts for options
have been calculated by multiplying the number of previously
unvested stock options by the difference between $50.00 per
share, the aggregate consideration per share under the merger
agreement, and the exercise price of the previously unvested
stock options. Amounts that would be payable with respect to
vested options are not included in the table. Thus, this amount
does not include the value of options that vest by their terms
in February 2010. |
|
(5) |
|
Restricted stock awards other than the shares awarded as the
2009 annual equity bonus will automatically vest upon the
effective time of the merger and each holder will have the right
to make the same elections as described below in Terms of
the Merger Agreement Conversion of Encore
Stock. Accordingly, the payment for restricted share
awards has been calculated by multiplying the number of
previously unvested shares of restricted stock by $50.00 per
share, which is the aggregate consideration per share under the
merger agreement. This amount does not include the value of
shares of restricted stock that vest by their terms in February
2010. |
|
(6) |
|
The 2009 annual equity bonus represents a grant of restricted
stock to be made in February 2010 (or, if earlier, as of the
effective time of the merger). This grant of restricted stock
will not vest on account of the transaction contemplated by the
merger agreement. However, this grant will vest if the executive
officer is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason. |
Indemnification
and Insurance
The merger agreement provides for director and officer
indemnification and insurance following completion of the
merger. Under the merger agreement, Denbury must, for a period
of six years following the later of the date of the merger
agreement or completion of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
include provisions relating to expense advancement and
indemnification in its and its subsidiaries organizational
documents that are no less favorable than those contained in
Encores certificate of incorporation and bylaws;
|
|
|
|
indemnify and hold harmless and advance expenses to, to the
fullest extent permitted by law, the present and former
directors, officers, employees, fiduciaries and agents of Encore
and its subsidiaries with respect to all acts or omissions by
them in their capacities as such, or taken at the request of
Encore, at any time; and
|
|
|
|
either maintain in effect the current directors and
officers liability insurance policies maintained by Encore
or its subsidiaries with respect to matters occurring on or
before completion of the merger or obtain and pay for substitute
policies of at least the same coverage and amounts and
containing terms no less advantageous to such directors and
officers than Encores current policies, except that
Denbury will not be required to pay annual premiums for such
policies in excess of 250% of Encores annual premiums in
effect for such policies as of October 31, 2009, the
execution date of the merger agreement.
|
86
The indemnification rights described above will be in addition
to any other rights available under the organizational documents
of Encore or its subsidiaries, any other indemnification
agreement or arrangement, Delaware law or otherwise.
Other
Benefit Arrangements
Under the merger agreement, any Encore employee who continues as
an employee of Denbury after the merger will receive service
credit under Denburys employee benefit plans, policies or
arrangements. The service credit will be to the extent service
with Denbury is recognized under any such benefit plan that is
equal to the period of time such employee was employed with
Encore and its subsidiaries or any predecessor employers with
respect to which Encore and its subsidiaries granted service
credit (but not for purposes of benefit accruals or benefit
computations, other than for purposes of vacation, sick pay or
other paid time off). Service credit will not be granted to the
extent such treatment would result in duplicative benefits for
the same period of service or to the extent such service is
prior to a specific date before which service would not have
been credited for employees of Denbury.
Appraisal
Rights
Encore stockholders will, under certain circumstances, be
entitled under Delaware law to exercise appraisal rights and
receive payment for the fair value of their Encore shares if the
merger is completed. However, under Section 262 of the
DGCL, appraisal rights are only available in connection with the
merger if, among other things, holders of Encore stock are
required to accept cash consideration for their Encore shares
(other than cash paid in lieu of fractional shares).
Accordingly, Denbury reserves the right to take the position
that appraisal rights are not available if, after application of
the proration provisions of the merger agreement, all
stockholders who elected to receive all stock consideration and
all stockholders who demanded appraisal of their shares could
have received consideration consisting of only Denbury common
stock and cash paid in lieu of receiving fractional shares of
Denbury common stock as a result of the merger. Encore
stockholders who wish to seek appraisal of their shares are in
any case urged to seek the advice of counsel with respect to the
availability of appraisal rights.
If appraisal rights are available, a holder of record of shares
of Encore common stock outstanding immediately prior to the
effective time of the merger who has not voted in favor of, or
consented in writing to, the adoption of the merger agreement
and who has delivered a written demand for appraisal of such
shares, executed by or on behalf of the stockholder of record,
in accordance with Section 262 of the DGCL will not be
converted into the right to receive the merger consideration,
unless and until the dissenting holder fails to perfect or
effectively withdraws or otherwise loses his, her or its right
to appraisal and payment under the DGCL. If, after the effective
time of the merger, a dissenting stockholder fails to perfect or
otherwise waives, or withdraws or loses his, her or its right to
appraisal, or a court determines that such holder is not
entitled to relief under the DGCL, then such holder or holders
(as the case may be) will forfeit such rights and his, her or
its shares of Encore common stock will be treated as if they had
been converted as of the effective time of the merger into the
right to receive the merger consideration without interest
thereon, upon surrender of the certificate or certificates that
formerly evidenced such shares.
The following discussion is not a complete statement of
appraisal rights under the DGCL and is qualified in its entirety
by the full text of Section 262 of the DGCL, which explains
the procedures and requirements for exercising statutory
appraisal rights and which is attached as Annex D to this
joint proxy
statement/prospectus
and incorporated herein by reference. All references in
Section 262 of the DGCL and in this summary to a
stockholder are, unless otherwise indicated, to the
record holder of the shares of Encores common stock as to
which appraisal rights are asserted. Stockholders intending to
exercise appraisal rights should review Annex D carefully.
To the extent appraisal rights are available in connection with
the merger, this joint proxy statement/prospectus constitutes
notice to Encores stockholders concerning the availability
of appraisal rights under Section 262 of the DGCL.
An Encore stockholder who wishes to exercise appraisal rights
should review carefully the following discussion and
Annex D to this joint proxy statement/prospectus, because
failure to comply timely and
87
fully with the procedures required by Section 262 of the
DGCL will result in the loss of any available appraisal
rights.
To the extent that appraisal rights are available in connection
with the merger under the DGCL, Encore stockholders who do not
wish to accept the merger consideration will be entitled to,
subject to compliance with the requirements summarized below,
demand an appraisal by the Delaware Court of Chancery of the
fair value of their shares of Encore common stock
and be paid in cash such amount in lieu of the merger
consideration that they would otherwise be entitled to receive
if the merger is consummated. For this purpose, the fair value
of shares of Encore common stock will be their fair value,
excluding any element of value arising from the consummation or
expectation of consummation of the merger, but including, unless
the court in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause
shown, interest from the effective date of the merger through
the date of payment of the judgment compounded quarterly and
accruing at 5% over the Federal Reserve discount rate (including
any surcharge) as established from time to time during the
period between the effective date of the merger and the date of
payment of the judgment. Stockholders who desire to exercise
their appraisal rights must satisfy all of the conditions of
Section 262 of the DGCL, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Written Demand for Appraisal Prior to the Vote at the Special
Meeting. A stockholder must deliver to Encore a
written demand for appraisal meeting the requirements of
Section 262 of the DGCL before Encore stockholders vote on
the adoption of the merger agreement at the special meeting.
Voting against or abstaining with respect to the adoption of the
merger agreement, failing to return a proxy or returning a proxy
voting against or abstaining with respect to the proposal to
adopt the merger agreement will not constitute the making of a
written demand for appraisal. The written demand for appraisal
must be separate from any proxy, abstention from the vote on the
merger agreement or vote against the merger agreement. The
written demand must reasonably inform Encore of the identity of
the stockholder of record and of that stockholders intent
to demand appraisal of his, her or its shares. Failure to timely
deliver a written demand for appraisal will cause a stockholder
to lose his, her or its appraisal rights.
|
|
|
|
Refrain from Voting in Favor of Adoption of the Merger
Agreement. In addition to making a written demand
for appraisal, a stockholder must not vote his, her or its
shares of Encore common stock in favor of the adoption of the
merger agreement. A submitted proxy not marked
AGAINST or ABSTAIN will be voted in
favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and will
result in the waiver of appraisal rights. A stockholder that has
not submitted a proxy will not waive his, her or its appraisal
rights solely by failing to vote if the stockholder satisfies
all other provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL.
|
|
|
|
Continuous Ownership of Encore Common Stock. A
stockholder must also continuously hold his, her or its shares
of Encore common stock from the date the stockholder makes the
written demand for appraisal through the effective time of the
merger. Accordingly, a stockholder who is the record holder of
shares of Encore common stock on the date the written demand for
appraisal is made but who thereafter transfers the shares prior
to the effective time of the merger will lose any right to
appraisal with respect to such shares.
|
|
|
|
Petition with the Chancery Court. Within
120 days after the effective date of the merger (but not
thereafter), either the surviving corporation or any stockholder
who has complied with the requirements of Section 262 of
the DGCL, which are briefly summarized above, must file a
petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery demanding a judicial
determination of the fair value of the shares of Encore common
stock held by all stockholders who are entitled to appraisal
rights. This petition in effect initiates a court proceeding in
Delaware. Because Denbury, as the surviving corporation, has no
obligation and no intention to file such a petition, if no
stockholder files such a petition with the Delaware Court of
Chancery within 120 days after the effective date of the
merger, any available appraisal rights will be lost, even if a
stockholder has fulfilled all other requirements to exercise
appraisal rights. If such a petition is filed, the Delaware
Court of Chancery could determine that the fair value of shares
of Encore common stock is more than, the same as or less than
the merger consideration. Notwithstanding that a demand for
appraisal must be executed by or on behalf of a
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
stockholder of record, a beneficial owner of shares entitled to
appraisal rights held either in a voting trust or by a nominee
on behalf of that beneficial owner may, in that beneficial
owners own name, file a petition for appraisal with
respect to the shares beneficially owned by that person and as
to which appraisal rights have been properly perfected.
|
Neither voting (in person or by proxy) against, abstaining
from voting on or failing to vote on the proposal to adopt the
merger agreement will constitute a written demand for appraisal
within the meaning of Section 262 of the DGCL. The written
demand for appraisal must be in addition to and separate from
any proxy or vote.
A demand for appraisal must be executed by or on behalf of the
stockholder of record, fully and correctly, as such
stockholders name appears on the stock certificate and
must state that such person intends to demand appraisal of his,
her or its shares of Encore common stock. If the shares are
owned of record by a person other than the beneficial owner,
including a broker, fiduciary (such as a trustee, guardian or
custodian), depositary or other nominee, this demand must be
executed by or for the record owner. If the shares are owned by
or for more than one person, as in a joint tenancy or tenancy in
common, the demand must be executed by or for all joint owners.
An authorized agent, including an agent for two or more joint
owners, may execute the demand for appraisal for a stockholder
of record. However, the agent must identify the record owner and
expressly disclose that, in exercising the demand, he is acting
as agent for the record owner. A person having a beneficial
interest in Encore common stock held of record in the name of
another person, such as a broker or nominee, must act promptly
to cause the record holder to follow the steps summarized herein
in a timely manner to perfect whatever appraisal rights the
beneficial owner may have.
A stockholder who elects to exercise appraisal rights should
mail or deliver his, her or its written demand to Encores
principal executive offices at 777 Main Street, Suite 1400,
Fort Worth, Texas, 76102, Attention: Investor Relations.
The written demand for appraisal should state the
stockholders name, mailing address and the number of
shares of Encore common stock owned by the stockholder, and must
reasonably inform Encore that the stockholder intends thereby to
demand appraisal of his, her or its shares of Encore common
stock. If appraisal rights are available in connection with the
merger, within ten days after the effective date of the merger,
Denbury will provide notice of the effective date of the merger
to all Encore stockholders who have complied with
Section 262 of the DGCL and have not voted for the merger.
A record holder, such as a broker, fiduciary, depositary or
other nominee, who holds shares of Encore common stock as a
nominee for others, may exercise any available appraisal rights
with respect to the shares held for all or less than all
beneficial owners of shares as to which that person is the
record owner. In that case, the written demand must set forth
the number of shares covered by the demand. When the number of
shares is not expressly stated, the demand will be presumed to
cover all shares of Encore common stock outstanding in the name
of that record owner.
Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger (but
not thereafter), any stockholder (including any beneficial owner
of shares entitled to appraisal rights) who is entitled to
appraisal rights in connection with the merger and has satisfied
the requirements of Section 262 of the DGCL may deliver to
Denbury a written demand for a statement listing the aggregate
number of shares not voted in favor of the merger and with
respect to which demands for appraisal have been received and
the aggregate number of holders of those shares. Denbury, as the
surviving corporation in the merger, must mail that written
statement to the stockholder within ten days after the
stockholders request is received by Denbury or within ten
days after the latest date for delivery of a demand for
appraisal under Section 262 of the DGCL, whichever is
later. If a petition for appraisal rights is timely filed in the
Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as set forth above
and a copy is served on Denbury, as the surviving corporation,
Denbury must then, within 20 days after service, file in
the office of the Delaware Register in Chancery, a duly verified
list containing the names and addresses of all stockholders who
have demanded payment for their shares and with whom agreements
as to the value of their shares have not been reached with
Denbury. If Denbury files a petition, the petition must be
accompanied by the duly verified list. The Register in Chancery,
if so ordered by the court, will give notice of the time and
place fixed for the hearing of that petition by registered or
certified mail to Denbury and to the stockholders shown on the
list at the addresses therein stated, and notice also will be
given by publishing a notice at least one week before the day of
the hearing in a newspaper of general circulation published in
the City of
89
Wilmington, Delaware, or such publication as the court deems
advisable. The court must approve the forms of the notices by
mail and by publication, and Denbury must bear the costs of the
notices.
At the hearing on the petition, the Court of Chancery of the
State of Delaware will determine which stockholders have become
entitled to appraisal rights. The court may require the
stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for their shares
(and who hold stock represented by certificates) to submit their
stock certificates to the Register in Chancery for notation of
the pendency of the appraisal proceedings and the Court of
Chancery of the State of Delaware may dismiss the proceedings as
to any stockholder that fails to comply with that direction.
After determining which stockholders are entitled to appraisal
rights, the court will appraise the shares owned by those
stockholders, determining the fair value of those
shares, exclusive of any element of value arising from the
accomplishment or expectation of the merger, together with
interest to be paid, if any, upon the amount determined to be
the fair value. In determining the fair value, the court must
take into account all relevant factors. The Delaware Supreme
Court has stated that proof of value by any techniques or
methods which are generally considered acceptable in the
financial community and otherwise admissible in court
should be considered and that [f]air price obviously
requires consideration of all relevant factors involving the
value of a company. Elements of future value, including
the nature of the enterprise that are known or susceptible of
proof as of the date of the merger and not the product of
speculation, may be considered, but any element of value arising
from accomplishment or expectation of the merger may not be
considered. Encore stockholders considering seeking appraisal
of their shares should note that the fair value of their shares
determined under Section 262 of the DGCL could be more
than, the same as or less than the consideration they would
receive pursuant to the merger agreement if they did not seek
appraisal of their shares.
The costs of the appraisal proceeding may be determined by the
court and taxed against the parties as the court deems equitable
under the circumstances. However, costs do not include
attorneys and expert witness fees. Each dissenting
stockholder is responsible for his, her or its attorneys
and expert witness fees, although, upon application of a
stockholder who has perfected appraisal rights, the court may
order that all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any
stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding,
including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys fees
and the fees and expenses of experts, be charged pro rata
against the value of all shares entitled to appraisal.
If a stockholder demands appraisal rights in compliance with the
requirements of Section 262 of the DGCL, then, after the
effective time of the merger, that stockholder will not be
entitled to: (i) vote that stockholders shares of
Encore common stock for any purpose; (ii) receive payment
of dividends or other distributions on that stockholders
shares that are payable to stockholders of record at a date
after the effective time of the merger; or (iii) receive
payment of any consideration provided for in the merger
agreement. A stockholder may withdraw his, her or its demand for
appraisal rights by a writing withdrawing his, her or its demand
for appraisal and accepting the merger consideration at any time
within 60 days after the effective time of the merger, or
at any time thereafter with Denburys written approval.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal proceeding in the
Delaware Court of Chancery may be dismissed as to any
stockholder without the approval of the court and that approval
may be conditioned upon such terms as the court deems just, but
this rule does not affect the right of any stockholder who has
not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding
as a named party to withdraw that stockholders demand for
appraisal and to accept the terms offered in the merger
agreement within 60 days after the effective date of the
merger. Subject to the foregoing, if any Encore stockholder
withdraws his, her or its demand for appraisal rights, then his,
her or its shares of Encore common stock will be automatically
converted into the right to receive the merger consideration,
without interest.
Any stockholder wishing to exercise appraisal rights is urged
to consult legal counsel before attempting to do so. Failure to
comply strictly with all of the procedures set forth in
Section 262 of the DGCL may result in the loss of any
available appraisal rights.
90
Termination
of Trading of Encore Common Stock
If the merger is completed, the shares of Encore common stock
will cease to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange and will
be deregistered under the Exchange Act.
Regulatory
Requirements
The merger is subject to antitrust laws. Denbury and Encore have
made their respective filings under applicable
U.S. antitrust laws with the Antitrust Division and the
FTC. Early termination of the waiting period was granted on
November 30, 2009.
At any time before or after the completion of the merger, the
Antitrust Division, the FTC or any state could take any action
under the antitrust laws that any of them considers necessary or
desirable in the public interest, including seeking to enjoin
the completion of the merger, unwinding the merger or seeking
divestitures of particular assets of Denbury and Encore. Private
parties and
non-U.S. governmental
authorities may also seek to take legal action under the
antitrust laws. If a challenge to the merger on antitrust
grounds were to be made and, if such a challenge was successful,
Denbury and Encore might not prevail.
Financing
of the Merger
Denbury received a financing commitment from J.P. Morgan,
subject to customary conditions, to underwrite a new senior
secured revolving credit facility. The newly committed financing
will be used to fund the cash portion of the merger
consideration (inclusive of payments due to Encore stock option
holders), repay amounts outstanding under Denburys
existing $750 million revolving credit facility, which had
approximately $180 million outstanding as of
January 31, 2010, potentially retire and replace up to
$825 million of Encores senior subordinated notes
that are outstanding, all of which have a change of control put
option at 101% of par value, replace Encores existing
revolving credit facility which had approximately
$155 million outstanding as of January 31, 2010, pay
Encores severance costs, pay transaction fees and expenses
and provide additional liquidity. The aggregate commitment of
the senior secured lenders is $1.6 billion and the term of
the facility is four years. Denbury has been advised by the
co-arrangers of this new senior secured revolving credit
facility, J.P. Morgan and Bank of America, N.A., that the
syndication phase is complete, and documentation for this
facility is being prepared. Subject to final documentation and
satisfaction of closing conditions, Denbury anticipates
finalizing this facility prior to the Denbury and Encore
stockholder meetings.
On February 3, 2010, Denbury completed the public offering
of $1 billion of its
81/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2020. The sale of these notes is
scheduled to close on February 10, 2010, subject to
customary closing conditions. The net proceeds from the notes
offering will be placed in escrow pending the closing of the
merger, subject to mandatory redemption of the notes if the
merger does not close, and partial redemption of notes to the
extent Encore outstanding senior subordinated notes are not
repurchased, as discussed below. Upon the closing of the merger,
$400 million of the escrowed proceeds will be released to
Denbury to finance a portion of the merger consideration, and
the remaining $600 million of escrowed proceeds will be
used to fund repurchases of $600 million principal amount
of three series of Encores outstanding senior subordinated
notes.
Denbury received a financing commitment for a $1.25 billion
unsecured bridge loan facility, which would have been available
if and to the extent Denbury had not secured alternate financing
prior to the closing of the merger, and also thereafter to the
date that is 45 days after the closing of the merger. The
bridge facility, if drawn, will mature initially on the first
anniversary of the closing of the merger, at which time the
maturity of any outstanding loans thereunder will be extended
automatically to the seventh anniversary of the closing of the
merger, except to the extent they have been previously exchanged
by the lenders for exchange notes due on that seventh
anniversary.
Denbury also received a financing commitment from
J.P. Morgan and JPMorgan Chase to fund a new
$375 million senior secured revolving credit facility to
replace an existing Encore Energy Partners Operating LLC, a
subsidiary of ENP, senior secured revolving credit facility,
should Denbury and Encore be unable to obtain a waiver of
covenants and amendment to the existing revolving credit
facility to allow for the merger.
91
On November 24, 2009, ENP obtained an amendment to the
existing revolving credit facility to allow for the merger.
The debt financing commitments are subject to:
|
|
|
|
|
consummation of the merger in accordance with the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
the absence of a material adverse effect (as defined
in the merger agreement) regarding Encore or Denbury;
|
|
|
|
the lenders not becoming aware of any information or other
matter that in their reasonable judgment is inconsistent in a
material and adverse manner with disclosures prior to the date
of the merger agreement or that in the reasonable opinion of
J.P. Morgan makes it impossible to complete a successful
syndication of the credit facilities or the sale of senior
subordinated notes;
|
|
|
|
the absence of certain competing issues of debt securities of
Denbury or Encore;
|
|
|
|
closing no later than May 31, 2010;
|
|
|
|
delivery of certain reserve reports and historical and pro forma
financial information;
|
|
|
|
execution of certain guarantees and creation of first priority
security interests;
|
|
|
|
the initial availability for borrowing of not less than
(i) $50 million under the ENP facility and
(ii) $400 million under the newly committed Denbury
senior secured facility;
|
|
|
|
pro forma compliance with certain financial covenants and
requirements;
|
|
|
|
a 30-day
period for syndication of the credit facilities and for
marketing of senior subordinated notes, and delivery by Denbury
of an offering memorandum for such notes on or prior to
February 15, 2010;
|
|
|
|
as a condition to the funding of the bridge facility, the bridge
facility and the senior subordinated notes having received
ratings from Moodys Investors Service, Inc. of at least B3
and from Standard & Poors Ratings Services of at
least B minus, in each case with stable outlook or
better; and
|
|
|
|
other customary financing conditions.
|
Fee letters executed in connection with the financing commitment
letter require Denbury to pay up to approximately
$50 million in fees if the loans do not close. The new
Denbury senior secured credit facility will be on substantially
the same terms, conformed to current market conditions, as are
provided for in Denburys existing credit facility.
In addition to the financing described above, in November 2009
Denbury entered into costless collar crude oil commodity
derivative contracts for 25,000 Bbl/d during 2011 with a
floor price of $102.58 per barrel, for the purpose of protecting
its cash flows in light of the increased debt levels it expects
in connection with the merger.
Litigation
Related to the Merger
Three shareholder lawsuits styled as class actions have been
filed against Encore and its board of directors. The lawsuits
are entitled Sanjay Israni, Individually and On Behalf of All
Others Similarly Situated vs. Encore Acquisition Company et al.
(filed November 4, 2009 in the District Court of
Tarrant County, Texas), Teamsters Allied Benefit Funds,
Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated vs.
Encore Acquisition Company et al. (filed November 5,
2009 in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware) and
Thomas W. Scott, Jr., individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated v. Encore Acquisition Company et
al. (filed November 6, 2009 in the District Court of
Tarrant County, Texas). The Teamsters and Scott
lawsuits also name Denbury as a defendant. The complaints
generally allege that (1) Encores directors breached
their fiduciary duties in negotiating and approving the merger
and by administering a sale process that failed to maximize
shareholder value and (2) Encore, and, in the case of the
Teamsters and Scott complaints, Denbury aided and
abetted Encores directors in breaching their fiduciary
duties. The Teamsters complaint also alleges that
Encores directors and executives stand to receive
substantial financial benefits if the transaction is consummated
on its current terms. The plaintiffs in these lawsuits seek,
among other things, to enjoin the merger and to rescind the
merger agreement. Encore and Denbury have entered into a
92
Memorandum of Understanding with the plaintiffs in these
lawsuits agreeing in principle to the settlement of the lawsuits
based upon inclusion in this joint proxy statement/prospectus of
additional disclosures requested by the plaintiffs, and agreeing
that the parties to the lawsuits will use best efforts to enter
into a definitive settlement agreement and seek court approval
for the settlement which would be binding on all Encore
shareholders who do not opt-out of the settlement.
A shareholder suit regarding a compensation matter brought as a
derivative action on behalf of Denbury against Denburys
board of directors, entitled Harbor Police Retirement
System v. Gareth Roberts, et al, in the District Court
of Dallas County, Texas, was amended during January 2010, to
generally allege breach of the Denbury directors fiduciary
duties based upon the further allegation that the directors
approved an unreasonably high purchase price in the merger. The
plaintiff seeks monetary damages and equitable relief. Denbury
believes these allegations are without merit and that its
directors have valid defenses to all claims. Denbury and its
directors intend to defend this litigation vigorously.
TERMS OF
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
The following summary describes the material provisions of
the merger agreement. The provisions of the merger agreement are
complicated and not easily summarized. This summary may not
contain all of the information about the merger agreement that
is important to you. The merger agreement is attached to this
joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex A and is
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. We encourage you to read it carefully in
its entirety for a more complete understanding of the merger
agreement.
The merger agreement and the following summary have been
included to provide you with information regarding the terms of
the merger agreement and the transactions described in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. Neither Denbury not Encore
intends that the merger agreement or any of its terms will
constitute a source of business or operational information about
Denbury or Encore. The representations and warranties in the
merger agreement are made as of a specified date, are tools used
to allocate risk between the parties, are subject to contractual
standards of knowledge and materiality, are modified or
qualified by information contained in the parties public
filings and in the disclosure schedules exchanged by the parties
and should not be relied on by any person or entity other than
Denbury or Encore for any purpose. Business and operational
information regarding Denbury and Encore can be found elsewhere
in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and in the other public
documents that Denbury and Encore file with the SEC. See
Where You Can Find More Information.
Merger
The agreement and plan of merger, dated October 31, 2009,
by and between Denbury and Encore contemplates a merger in which
Encore will be merged with and into Denbury, with Denbury
surviving the merger. Upon effectiveness of the merger, each
Encore stockholder will have the right to receive the merger
consideration as described below under
Conversion of Encore Stock.
Effective
Time; Closing
The merger will become effective on the date a certificate of
merger is filed with the Delaware Secretary of State. The merger
agreement provides that the certificate of merger is to be filed
as promptly as practicable after all the conditions to the
closing of the merger are satisfied or waived. Denbury and
Encore currently expect to consummate the merger promptly upon
stockholder approval.
Conversion
of Encore Stock
Under the merger agreement, Encore stockholders may elect to
receive consideration consisting of cash, shares of Denbury
common stock, or a combination of both in exchange for their
shares of Encore common stock, subject to the proration feature
described in Election Procedures
Allocation of Merger Consideration. Encore stockholders
electing to receive a mix of cash and stock consideration and
non-electing
93
stockholders will receive $15.00 in cash and between 2.0698 and
2.6336 shares of Denbury common stock in exchange for each
Encore share. Subject to proration, Encore stockholders electing
to receive all cash will receive $50.00 per Encore share, and
Encore stockholders electing to receive only Denbury common
stock will receive between 2.9568 and 3.7622 shares of
Denbury common stock in exchange for each Encore share. The
actual number of shares of Denbury common stock to be issued to
Encore stockholders receiving either all stock or a mix of cash
and stock consideration will be determined under the collar
mechanism described below based upon the Denbury
20-day
average price. Based on the number of shares of Encore common
stock outstanding as of February 3, 2010, the maximum
number of shares of Denbury common stock to be issued in
connection with the merger will not exceed 146 million
shares. In our discussion, we refer to the number of shares of
Denbury common stock to be received for each share of Encore
common stock as the stock consideration, the amount
of cash to be received for each share of Encore common stock as
the cash consideration and the stock consideration
together with the cash consideration as the merger
consideration.
Per
Share Merger Consideration
If an Encore stockholder elects to receive a mix of cash and
stock, that stockholder will be entitled to receive $15.00 in
cash and a number of shares of Denbury common stock determined
by dividing $35.00 by the Denbury
20-day
average price. However, an Encore stockholder electing to
receive the mixed consideration will receive:
|
|
|
|
|
a maximum of 2.6336 shares of Denbury common stock per
share of Encore common stock, which would occur if the Denbury
20-day
average price is equal to or less than $13.29 per share; and
|
|
|
|
a minimum of 2.0698 shares of Denbury common stock per
share of Encore common stock, which would occur if the Denbury
20-day
average price is greater than or equal to $16.91 per share.
|
If an Encore stockholder elects to receive all cash, that
stockholder will be entitled to receive $50.00 per share of
Encore common stock, subject to the proration feature described
in Election Procedures Allocation
of Merger Consideration.
If an Encore stockholder elects to receive all stock, that
stockholder will be entitled to receive a number of shares of
Denbury common stock determined by dividing $50.00 by the
Denbury
20-day
average price, subject to the proration feature described in
Election Procedures Allocation of
Merger Consideration. However, an Encore stockholder
electing to receive all stock consideration will receive:
|
|
|
|
|
a maximum of 3.7622 shares of Denbury common stock per
share of Encore common stock, which would occur if the Denbury
20-day
average price is equal to or less than $13.29 per share; and
|
|
|
|
a minimum of 2.9568 shares of Denbury common stock per
share of Encore common stock, which would occur if the Denbury
20-day
average price is greater than or equal to $16.91 per share.
|
An Encore stockholder failing to make an election will receive
consideration in the form of the
cash/stock
mix.
Employee
Stock Options; Restricted Shares
At the effective time of the merger, each outstanding option to
purchase shares of Encore common stock, will fully vest and will
be converted into an obligation of Denbury to pay the option
holder an amount in cash equal to the product of (i) the
number of shares of Encore common stock subject to the option
and (ii) the excess, if any, of the aggregate consideration
per share (or with respect to certain pre-2005 options, the
highest price per share paid within 60 days prior to the
merger) over the exercise price per share previously subject to
the option.
Immediately prior to the effective time of the merger, each
outstanding award of restricted stock granted by Encore or any
of its subsidiaries pursuant to an employee benefit plan will
become fully vested and each holder will have the right to make
the same elections as described above in
Conversion of Encore Stock, except that
any shares of Encore restricted stock granted as a 2009 bonus
pursuant to the Encore annual incentive program will be
converted into a number of restricted shares of Denbury common
stock determined
94
by multiplying (i) the number of restricted shares of
Encore common stock subject to that grant by (ii) the
exchange ratio used in determining the consideration payable to
Encore stockholders who have elected to receive only common
stock consideration.
Dissenting
Shares
In certain circumstances, holders of Encore stock who have not
voted in favor of or consented to the merger and have otherwise
complied with the provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL as
to appraisal rights will be entitled to such rights as are
granted by Section 262 of the DGCL. If any holder of such
dissenting shares fails to perfect, withdraws or loses the right
to appraisal under Section 262 of the DGCL, then each
dissenting share held by that holder will be deemed to have been
converted into the right to receive the merger consideration.
See The Merger Appraisal Rights.
Encore is required to give Denbury prompt notice of any written
demand for appraisal of Encores common stock and to afford
Denbury the opportunity to direct all negotiations and
proceedings with respect to demands for appraisal under the DGCL.
Election
Procedures
The election form and other appropriate and customary
transmittal materials will be mailed to Encore stockholders on
or about February 10, 2010.
The election form will permit each Encore stockholder to specify
the number of Encore shares with respect to which that holder
elects to receive the (i) mixed cash/stock consideration,
(ii) all stock consideration or (iii) all cash
consideration. The election must be made prior to the election
deadline. Unless extended or otherwise agreed upon by Denbury
and Encore, the election deadline will be 5:00 p.m., New
York time, on the 20th day following the date the election
form is mailed to Encore stockholders.
To make a valid election, each Encore stockholder must submit a
properly completed election form so that it is actually received
by the exchange agent at or prior to the election deadline. An
election form will be completed properly only if accompanied by
certificates that represent the stockholders shares of
Encore common stock covered by the election form (or customary
affidavits and, if required, indemnification regarding the loss
or destruction of such certificates or the guaranteed delivery
of such certificates) and/or, in case of book-entry shares, upon
the receipt of an agents message by the
exchange agent or such other evidence of transfer as the
exchange agent may reasonably request together with any
additional documents specified by the procedures set forth in
the election form.
If an Encore stockholder does not make an election to receive
all cash consideration or all stock consideration pursuant to
the merger, the election form is not received by the exchange
agent by the election deadline, or the election form is
improperly completed
and/or is
not signed, the stockholder will be considered not to have made
an election. We sometimes refer to such shares as
non-election shares. Stockholders not making an
election will receive the mixed cash/stock consideration.
The actual allocation of cash and stock will be subject in each
case to the allocation procedures set forth in the merger
agreement and further described below. Under the procedures, an
Encore stockholder who makes an all cash election will not
receive all cash if the cash election pool is oversubscribed and
an Encore stockholder who makes an all stock election will not
receive all stock if the stock election pool is oversubscribed.
For more information regarding these allocation procedures, see
Allocation of Merger Consideration.
Any election form may be revoked or changed by a stockholder
submitting the election form prior to the election deadline. If
the election is so revoked, the shares of Encore common stock
covered by that election form will become non-election shares
and Denbury will return the certificate of Encore common stock
without charge to the revoking stockholder upon written request,
unless the stockholder properly makes a subsequent election. The
exchange agent will have reasonable discretion to determine, in
good faith, whether any election, revocation or change has been
made properly or timely and to disregard immaterial defects in
the election
95
forms. None of Denbury, Encore or the exchange agent will be
under any obligation to notify stockholders of any defect in an
election form.
Allocation
of Merger Consideration
The aggregate cash consideration to be received by Encore
stockholders pursuant to the merger will be fixed at an amount
equal to the product of $15.00 and the number of issued and
outstanding shares of Encore common stock immediately prior to
closing of the merger (excluding certain shares that do not
convert into the right to receive merger consideration).
Accordingly, if Encore stockholders elect, in the aggregate, to
receive cash in an amount greater than the aggregate cash
consideration payable under the merger agreement, or less than
the aggregate cash consideration payable under the merger
agreement, then those holders electing to receive either all
cash or all stock consideration, as the case may be, will be pro
rated down and will receive the undersubscribed form of merger
consideration as a portion of the overall consideration they
receive for their shares. As a result, Encore stockholders that
make a valid election to receive all cash or all stock
consideration may not receive merger consideration entirely in
the form elected.
Surrender
of Shares; Stock Transfer Books
Prior to the effective time of the merger, Denbury will deposit
with Broadridge Financial Solutions as the exchange agent for
the merger, the number of shares of Denbury common stock to be
issued pursuant to the merger agreement and cash to be paid to
Encore stockholders equal to the cash portion of the merger
consideration. That cash will be invested by the exchange agent
as directed by Denbury, but in the event of any loss in that
investment, Denbury will be required to provide additional funds
to the exchange agent promptly in the amount of such loss.
Promptly after the effective time of the merger, Denbury will
cause the exchange agent to send to each holder of record of
Encore common stock at the effective time of the merger a letter
of transmittal and instructions for effecting the exchange of
Encore common stock for the merger consideration the holder is
entitled to receive under the merger agreement. Upon surrender
of the certificates or book-entry shares for cancellation (if
not previously submitted with an election form), along with the
executed letter of transmittal and other documents, an Encore
stockholder will receive the merger consideration, which may
include: (i) a certificate representing the stock
consideration; (ii) the cash consideration; (iii) cash
in lieu of fractional shares of Denbury common stock; and
(iv) any unpaid dividends and distributions declared and
paid in respect of Denbury common stock after completion of the
merger.
No fractional shares of Denbury common stock will be issued to
any holder of Encore common stock upon completion of the merger.
For each fractional share that would otherwise be issued,
Denbury will pay cash (without interest) in an amount equal to
the fractional share multiplied by the closing price for a share
of Denbury common stock on the business day immediately
preceding the closing date.
At any time following six months after the effective time of the
merger, Denbury will have the right to require the exchange
agent to return any shares of Denbury common stock and cash that
remain unclaimed. Any holder of Encore common stock that has not
exchanged certificates representing that stock prior to that
time may thereafter look only to Denbury to exchange stock
certificates or to pay amounts to which that stockholder is
entitled pursuant to the merger agreement. None of Denbury,
Encore or the exchange agent will be liable to any holder of
Encore common stock certificates for any merger consideration
delivered to a public official pursuant to applicable abandoned
property, escheat or similar laws.
Withholding
Taxes
Denbury and the exchange agent will be entitled to deduct and
withhold from consideration payable to any Encore stockholder
the amounts that may be required to be withheld under any tax
law. The properly withheld amounts will be treated for all
purposes of the merger as having been paid to the stockholders
from whom they were withheld.
96
Representations
and Warranties
The merger agreement contains representations and warranties
made by each of the parties regarding aspects of its business,
financial condition and structure and other facts pertinent to
the merger. Each of Encore and Denbury has made representations
and warranties to the other in the merger agreement with respect
to the following subjects:
|
|
|
|
|
existence, good standing and qualification to conduct business;
|
|
|
|
organizational documents;
|
|
|
|
capitalization, including ownership of subsidiary capital stock
and the absence of restrictions or encumbrances with respect to
the capital stock of any material subsidiary;
|
|
|
|
requisite power and authorization to enter into and carry out
the obligations of the merger agreement and the enforceability
of the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
absence of any violation of organizational documents or third
party agreements;
|
|
|
|
compliance with applicable laws;
|
|
|
|
filings and reports with the SEC, financial information,
internal accounting controls and disclosure controls and
procedures;
|
|
|
|
absence of undisclosed liabilities or obligations;
|
|
|
|
absence of certain changes or events;
|
|
|
|
litigation;
|
|
|
|
employee benefit plans;
|
|
|
|
accuracy of information provided for inclusion in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus;
|
|
|
|
title to properties;
|
|
|
|
information supplied in connection with oil and gas reserve
reports;
|
|
|
|
tax matters;
|
|
|
|
environmental matters;
|
|
|
|
intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
derivative transactions and hedging;
|
|
|
|
jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission;
|
|
|
|
insurance;
|
|
|
|
labor matters;
|
|
|
|
related party transactions;
|
|
|
|
material contracts;
|
|
|
|
opinions of financial advisors;
|
|
|
|
fees payable to brokers, finders or investment banks in
connection with the merger; and
|
|
|
|
required stockholder approval.
|
Encore has made additional representations and warranties to
Denbury in the merger agreement with respect to the following
subjects:
|
|
|
|
|
the inapplicability to the merger agreement of any anti-takeover
law or provision in Encores certificate of
incorporation; and
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
that the merger will not result in the grant of any rights to
any person under Encores rights agreement.
|
Denbury has made additional representations and warranties to
Encore in the merger agreement with respect to the following
subjects:
|
|
|
|
|
receipt of a commitment letter for financing; and
|
|
|
|
the absence of ownership by Denbury of Encore common stock.
|
Certain representations and warranties of Denbury and Encore are
qualified as to materiality or as to material adverse
effect, which when used with respect to Denbury or Encore
means, as the case may be, any change or event that is
materially adverse to the business, results of operations or
financial condition of that party and its subsidiaries taken as
whole, except in each case for any such effect attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
general economic, financial market, regulatory or political
conditions, any outbreak of hostilities or war, acts of
terrorism, natural disasters or other force majeure events
unless it affects that company disproportionately relative to
other industry participants;
|
|
|
|
changes in or events or conditions generally affecting the oil
and natural gas industry or exploration and production
companies, unless it affects that company disproportionately
relative to other industry participants;
|
|
|
|
changes in oil and natural gas prices, including changes in
price differentials;
|
|
|
|
changes in other commodity prices;
|
|
|
|
changes of laws or changes to GAAP or interpretations thereof;
|
|
|
|
the negotiation, execution, announcement or pendency of the
merger agreement, any actions taken in compliance with the
merger agreement or the consummation of the merger;
|
|
|
|
changes in reserve estimates;
|
|
|
|
the accounting for its hedging activities and any
mark-to-market
gains or losses with respect to hedges;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
filing, defense or settlement of any legal proceedings brought
by that partys stockholders related to the merger;
|
|
|
|
failure to take any action as a result of any restrictions on
conduct of its business set forth in the merger agreement if the
other party refused to provide a waiver;
|
|
|
|
failure to meet published estimates or expectations of financial
or operating results or to meet internal budgets or plans;
|
|
|
|
the downgrade in rating of any debt or debt security of that
party; or
|
|
|
|
changes in the price or trading volume of that partys
common stock; except that, with respect to the last three items
above, the occurrence of any such failure, downgrade or change
does not prevent a determination that any underlying cause of
that failure, downgrade or change resulted in or contributed to
a material adverse effect on Denbury or Encore, as applicable.
|
Conduct
of Business Pending the Effective Time
Unless Denbury otherwise consents in writing (which consent may
not be unreasonably withheld), or as contemplated by the merger
agreement and excluding transactions between Encore and its
subsidiaries, Encore has agreed that, prior to the effective
time of the merger, it and its subsidiaries will conduct their
respective businesses in all material respects in the ordinary
course and in a manner consistent with past practice. In
98
addition, the merger agreement places specific restrictions on
the ability of Encore and its subsidiaries to, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
amend or otherwise change their organizational documents or
amend or otherwise change, or waive any provision of,
Encores Rights Agreement;
|
|
|
|
issue, sell or encumber any shares of capital stock, options,
warrants, convertible securities or any other ownership
interest, except pursuant to current employee benefit plans;
|
|
|
|
declare or pay any dividend or other distribution (except for
intercompany transactions and except for ENPs regular
quarterly distributions);
|
|
|
|
reclassify, combine, split or subdivide or redeem, purchase or
otherwise acquire, directly or indirectly, any of Encores
capital stock;
|
|
|
|
make an acquisition in excess of $15 million in the
aggregate or incur any indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
(i) increase materially the compensation for, or grant any
severance or termination pay to, any officer or employee, except
in accordance with past practice or pursuant to existing
contractual arrangements, (ii) enter into or amend any
employment or severance agreement with any director, officer or
other employee of Encore or any of its subsidiaries or
(iii) enter into or amend any collective bargaining, bonus,
profit sharing or other plan, agreement or arrangement for the
benefit of any director, officer or employee, except (A) in
the ordinary course and in a manner consistent with past
practice, (B) pursuant to existing contractual arrangements
or (C) as required by applicable law;
|
|
|
|
pay or settle any material claim, liability or obligation other
than in the ordinary course consistent with past practice that
involves monetary damages in excess of $10 million in the
aggregate or that exceeds the amount reserved against in the
financial statements;
|
|
|
|
make any capital expenditures in any fiscal quarter exceeding
the capital expenditure budget for such quarter by more than
$25 million;
|
|
|
|
sell or encumber assets or properties having a value in excess
of $25 million in the aggregate;
|
|
|
|
enter into any derivative transaction that would result in more
than 70% of Encores oil or natural gas production being
hedged beyond December 31, 2011;
|
|
|
|
enter into, materially amend or terminate any material contract
if the amount involved exceeds $15 million in the aggregate;
|
|
|
|
change Encores methods of accounting, except in accordance
with GAAP as concurred in by its independent auditor; and
|
|
|
|
enter into any closing agreement with respect to material taxes
or settle or compromise any material liability for taxes.
|
Unless Encore otherwise consents in writing (which consent may
not be unreasonably withheld), or as contemplated by the merger
agreement and excluding transactions between Denbury and its
subsidiaries, Denbury has agreed that, prior to the effective
time of the merger, it and its subsidiaries will conduct their
respective businesses in all material respects in the ordinary
course and in a manner consistent with past practice. In
addition, the merger agreement places specific restrictions on
the ability of Denbury and its subsidiaries to, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
amend or otherwise change their organizational documents;
|
|
|
|
declare or pay any dividend or other distribution (except for
intercompany transactions);
|
|
|
|
reclassify Denburys capital stock;
|
|
|
|
make an acquisition in excess of $30 million in the
aggregate; or
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
incur any indebtedness other than in the ordinary course of
business, to refinance existing indebtedness or to finance any
acquisition permitted by the merger agreement.
|
Certain
Additional Agreements
Stockholders Meetings. Unless the merger
agreement is earlier terminated, the boards of directors of
Encore and Denbury must submit the merger agreement for adoption
by stockholders at their respective stockholders meetings, even
if they change their respective recommendations with regard to
the merger agreement.
No Solicitation, Recommendation. Encore and
its subsidiaries will not, and Encore and its subsidiaries will
direct their respective officers, directors, investment bankers,
attorneys, accountants, financial advisors, agents and other
representatives not to:
|
|
|
|
|
directly or indirectly initiate, solicit, knowingly encourage or
knowingly facilitate any inquiry or the making or submission of
any proposal that constitutes, or could reasonably be expected
to lead to, an acquisition proposal (as defined below) for
Encore;
|
|
|
|
participate or engage in discussions or negotiations with or
disclose any non-public information or data relating to Encore
or any of its subsidiaries or afford access to the properties,
books or records of Encore or any of its subsidiaries to any
person that has made an acquisition proposal for Encore or to
any person in contemplation of an acquisition proposal; or
|
|
|
|
accept an acquisition proposal for Encore or enter into any
agreement, including any letter of intent, memorandum of
understanding, agreement in principle, merger agreement,
acquisition agreement, option agreement, joint venture
agreement, partnership agreement or other similar agreement,
arrangement or understanding, (i) constituting or related
to, or that is intended to or could reasonably be expected to
lead to, any acquisition proposal for Encore or
(ii) requiring, intended to cause or that could reasonably
be expected to cause Encore to abandon, terminate or fail to
consummate the merger.
|
The term acquisition proposal, with respect to any
entity, means any bona fide proposal, whether or not in writing,
for the (i) direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of a
business or assets that constitute 15% or more of the net
revenues, net income or the assets of such entity and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (ii) direct or indirect
acquisition or purchase of 15% or more of any class of equity
securities or capital stock of such entity or any of its
subsidiaries whose business constitutes 15% or more of the net
revenues, net income or assets of such entity and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or (iii) merger,
consolidation, restructuring, transfer of assets or other
business combination, sale of shares of capital stock, tender
offer, exchange offer, recapitalization, stock repurchase
program or other similar transaction that if consummated would
result in any person beneficially owning 15% or more of any
class of equity securities of such entity or any of its
subsidiaries whose business constitutes 15% or more of the net
revenues, net income or assets of such entity and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, other than the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement.
However, prior to obtaining Encores stockholder adoption
of the merger agreement, Encore or its board of directors may
(i) participate or engage in negotiations or discussions
with or disclose any non-public information or data relating to
Encore or any of its subsidiaries or afford access to the
properties, books or records of Encore or any of its
subsidiaries to any person that has made an acquisition proposal
for Encore or to any person in contemplation of an acquisition
proposal or (ii) accept an acquisition proposal for Encore
or enter into any agreement, including any letter of intent,
memorandum of understanding, agreement in principle, merger
agreement, acquisition agreement, option agreement, joint
venture agreement, partnership agreement or other similar
agreement, arrangement or understanding, (A) constituting
or related to, or that is intended to or could reasonably be
expected to lead to, any acquisition proposal for Encore or
(B) requiring, intended to cause, or which could reasonably
be expected to cause Encore to abandon, terminate or fail to
consummate the merger if:
|
|
|
|
|
Encore receives an unsolicited written acquisition proposal;
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
Encores board of directors determines in good faith (after
consultation with its financial advisors and legal counsel) that
such proposal constitutes or could reasonably be expected to
lead to a superior proposal (as defined below);
|
|
|
|
Encore receives from such person an executed confidentiality
agreement having provisions that are no less restrictive than
Encores confidentiality agreement with Denbury; and
|
|
|
|
Encore previously disclosed or concurrently discloses or makes
available the same information, if any, to Denbury and provides
Denbury with a copy of the confidentiality agreement Encore
entered into with such person.
|
In addition, prior to obtaining Encores stockholder
adoption of the merger agreement, Encores board of
directors may effect a change in the Encore boards
recommendation of the merger (as defined below) in response to:
|
|
|
|
|
a superior proposal; or
|
|
|
|
an intervening event (as defined below) if Encores board
of directors concludes in good faith (after consultation with
its outside legal counsel) that a failure to make a change in
Encores recommendation would breach its fiduciary duties
under applicable law.
|
The term superior proposal means any bona fide
written acquisition proposal with respect to Encore made by a
third party to acquire, directly or indirectly, pursuant to a
tender offer, exchange offer, merger, share exchange,
consolidation or other business combination, (i) 50% or
more of the assets of Encore and its subsidiaries, taken as a
whole, or (ii) 50% or more of the then outstanding equity
securities of Encore, in each case on terms that a majority of
the board of directors of Encore determines in good faith (after
consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal
counsel, and taking into account all financial, legal and
regulatory terms and conditions of the acquisition proposal and
the merger agreement, including any alternative transaction
(including any modification to the terms of the merger
agreement) proposed by any other party in response to that
superior proposal, including any conditions to and expected
timing of consummation, and any risks of non-consummation, of
such acquisition proposal) to be more favorable to Encores
stockholders (in their capacity as stockholders) than the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and any
alternative transaction (including any modification to the terms
of the merger agreement) proposed by Denbury.
The term intervening event means, with respect to
either party, a material event or circumstance that was not
known or reasonably foreseeable to the board of directors of
that party on the date of the merger agreement (or if known, the
consequences of which were not known to or reasonably
foreseeable by that board of directors), which event or
circumstance, or material consequences thereof, becomes known to
the board of directors of that party prior to the time at which
that party receives the applicable stockholder approval, but in
no event will any of the following constitute an intervening
event: (i) the receipt, existence or terms of an
acquisition proposal for Denbury or of information or any
communication that could lead to any acquisition by Denbury of
any business or assets other than Encore, or any consequence
thereof, (ii) any failure to arrange or receive the
financing, or any of the terms or consequences of the financing,
or (iii) any change in, or event or condition generally
affecting, the oil and natural gas industry or exploration and
production companies, including, without limitation, any change
in oil or natural gas prices or price differentials.
The term change in the Encore boards
recommendation means Encores board of directors:
|
|
|
|
|
withdrawing, or proposing to withdraw, the approval,
recommendation or declaration of advisability of the merger
agreement or the merger; or
|
|
|
|
recommending, adopting or approving, or proposing publicly to
recommend, adopt or approve, any acquisition proposal.
|
Under the merger agreement, Encores board of directors
will not be entitled to make a change in its recommendation
until the fourth business day following Denburys receipt
of written notice from Encore. That notice must (i) advise
Denbury of the intent to effect a change in the Encore
boards recommendation, specify the material terms and
conditions of the superior proposal and identify the person or
group making the
101
superior proposal or (ii) describe the intervening event if
the intended change in the Encore boards recommendation
relates to an intervening event.
Encore will not be allowed to make a change in the Encore
boards recommendation and enter into an alternative
agreement if during the four business day period described above
Denbury proposes any alternative transaction, unless
Encores board of directors determines in good faith (after
consultation with its financial advisors and legal counsel and
taking into account all financial, legal and regulatory terms
and conditions of that alternative transaction proposal) that
such alternative transaction proposal is not at least as
favorable to Encores stockholders as the superior
proposal. Any change in the financial or other material terms of
a superior proposal in response to any alternative transaction
proposal (including any modifications to the terms of the merger
agreement) by Denbury will require Encore to provide Denbury
with a new notice and a new two business day period. At
Denburys request, Encore will be required to engage in
good faith negotiations with Denbury during the four or two
business day period described above after Denburys receipt
of Encores notice specifying that Encores board of
directors intends to make a change in its recommendation in
response to an intervening event, to amend the merger agreement
in a manner such that the failure by Encores board of
directors to make a change in its recommendation would no longer
cause Encores board of directors to be in breach of its
fiduciary duties under applicable law.
Prior to obtaining Denburys stockholder adoption of the
merger agreement, Denbury or its board of directors may make a
change in the Denbury boards recommendation in favor of
adoption of the merger agreement, in response to an intervening
event if Denburys board of directors concludes in good
faith (after consultation with legal counsel and, if
appropriate, its financial advisor) that the failure to take
that action would breach its fiduciary duties under applicable
law. However, Denbury will not be entitled to make a change in
the Denbury boards recommendation unless Denbury provides
Encore with written notice of its intention to do so at least
four business days before taking that action. The required
notice must describe the intervening event. At Encores
request, Denbury will be required to engage in good faith
negotiations with Encore during the four business day period
after Encores receipt of Denburys written notice to
amend the merger agreement in a manner such that the failure by
Denburys board of directors to make a change in its
recommendation would no longer cause Denburys board of
directors to be in breach of its fiduciary duties under
applicable law.
Employee Matters. Encore employees who remain
employed by Denbury following the merger will be provided
benefits comparable to those provided to similarly situated
Denbury employees with credit for service with Encore for
purposes of eligibility and vesting. Vacation and sick pay
accruals will be credited to Encore employees for the year in
which the merger occurs. Encore employees will be eligible to
participate in Denburys medical and dental plans without
any waiting period or pre-existing condition exclusions, except
to the extent such waiting period or exclusion applied in the
applicable Encore plan. Encore employees will receive credit for
amounts paid under the Encore medical plans in the year in which
the merger occurs for satisfying deductibles under the Denbury
plans.
Encore may pay its employees that are eligible to participate in
its annual incentive program a (i) 2009 cash bonus at the
participants target annual cash incentive opportunity and
(ii) 2009 equity bonus equal to the participants
target annual equity incentive opportunity in the form of
restricted shares of Encore common stock. The 2009 equity bonus
will not vest at the effective time of the merger, but will be
converted into a number of restricted shares of Denbury common
stock determined by multiplying (i) the number of
restricted shares of Encore common stock subject to that grant
by (ii) the exchange ratio used in determining the
consideration payable to Encore stockholders who have elected to
receive only common stock consideration. However, the restricted
shares of Denbury common stock will vest if the Encore employee
is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason at or
after the effective time of the merger.
Within 30 days after the effective time of the merger,
Encore employees that are still employed by Denbury will receive
a Denbury incentive grant in an amount and form consistent with
Denburys incentive plan structure for similarly situated
employees. Encore employees eligible to participate in
Encores annual incentive program will receive a 2010
annual incentive opportunity, which will be the same target as
the 2009 incentive opportunity. However, if an Encore employee
is terminated by Denbury without cause or resigns for
102
good reason prior to the date Denbury pays 2010 bonuses to its
employees, then the terminated Encore employee will receive the
pro rata portion of his or her 2010 target annual bonus.
Denbury and Encore acknowledge that a change of control has
occurred for purposes of Encores incentive and severance
plans. Therefore, following the effective time of the merger,
the terms of the following Encore agreements and plans will be
honored:
|
|
|
|
|
Encores Employee Severance Protection Plan;
|
|
|
|
Encores 2000 Incentive Stock Plan;
|
|
|
|
Encores 2008 Incentive Stock Plan;
|
|
|
|
Encore Energy Partners LP Second Amended and Restated Agreement
of Limited Partnership; and
|
|
|
|
Encore Energy Partners GP LLCs Long-Term Incentive Plan.
|
Financing. Denbury has agreed to use its
reasonable best efforts to arrange and consummate, prior to the
effective time of the merger, financing necessary to provide
immediately available funds sufficient to pay (1) the cash
portion of the merger consideration and (2) any other
amounts payable by Denbury under the merger agreement. Denbury
will keep Encore informed with respect to all material activity
concerning the status of the financing contemplated by the
financing commitment letter and must give Encore prompt notice
of any material adverse change with respect thereto. Denbury
will not take or fail to take any action that could reasonably
be expected to breach or make untrue any representation or
warranty contained in the financing commitment letter or
otherwise delay or prevent the financing contemplated by the
financing commitment letter. If the financing contemplated by
the commitment letter becomes unavailable, Denbury will use its
reasonable best efforts to secure an alternate financing
commitment for an equivalent amount of funds and on terms no
less favorable to Denbury, in the aggregate, than those
applicable to the prior financing commitment letter. Denbury
will make a public announcement two days prior to the Denbury
stockholders meeting stating whether it has entered into binding
agreements to obtain the financing and whether the conditions
contained in those agreements will be satisfied or waived on or
prior to closing. See The Merger Financing of
the Merger.
Reorganization. Denbury and Encore have agreed
to use their reasonable best efforts to cause the merger to
qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code and to file all tax returns
consistent with the treatment of the merger as a reorganization.
Financing Cooperation. Encore will cooperate
with Denburys efforts to secure the financing and assist
Denbury in various ways specified in the merger agreement and
Denbury will reimburse Encore for the expenses it incurs in
doing so.
Denbury Directors. At the effective time of
the merger, Encores board of directors will resign and
Denburys board of directors will continue as directors of
the surviving entity. Thus, Denburys board of directors
and executive officers will remain the same following the merger
as they are immediately before the merger becomes effective.
Conditions
to the Merger
Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party to Effect the
Merger. The respective obligations of each party
to effect the merger will be subject to the fulfillment of the
following conditions on or prior to the closing date:
|
|
|
|
|
the adoption of the merger agreement by the requisite approval
of Encores stockholders;
|
|
|
|
the adoption of the merger agreement by the requisite approval
of Denburys stockholders;
|
|
|
|
the termination or expiration of the waiting period under the
HSR Act;
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
the absence of any statute, rule or regulation promulgated by
any governmental authority and the absence of any order, decree,
injunction or ruling of a court of competent jurisdiction
prohibiting, preventing or enjoining the consummation of the
merger;
|
|
|
|
the approval for listing on the New York Stock Exchange of the
Denbury common stock to be issued pursuant to the
merger; and
|
|
|
|
the registration statement that includes this prospectus shall
have become effective under the Securities Act and shall not be
the subject of any stop order or proceeding seeking a stop order.
|
Additional Conditions to the Obligations of
Encore. Unless waived by Encore, the obligation
of Encore to effect the merger is subject to the satisfaction on
or prior to the closing date of the following additional
conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
performance in all material respects by Denbury of its
respective covenants required to be performed by it under the
merger agreement at or prior to the closing date;
|
|
|
|
certain representations and warranties of Denbury contained in
the merger agreement being materially true and correct as of the
date of the merger agreement and as of the closing date;
|
|
|
|
other representations and warranties of Denbury contained in the
merger agreement being true and correct as of the date of the
merger agreement and as of the closing date, except where the
failure of any such representations and warranties to be so true
and correct would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a
material adverse effect;
|
|
|
|
receipt by Encore of a certificate signed on behalf of Denbury
by an executive officer to the effect that the conditions
specified in the preceding three items have been satisfied;
|
|
|
|
receipt by Encore of an opinion from its legal counsel, dated as
of the closing date, to the effect that for federal income tax
purposes (i) the merger will be treated as a reorganization
within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code and
(ii) each of Denbury and Encore will be a party to the
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the
Code; and
|
|
|
|
the absence of any change in the condition (financial or
otherwise), operations, business or properties of Denbury and
its subsidiaries that constitutes or is reasonably likely to
constitute a material adverse effect.
|
Additional Conditions to the Obligations of
Denbury. Unless waived by Denbury, the
obligations of Denbury to effect the merger are subject to the
satisfaction on or prior to the closing date of the following
additional conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
certain representations and warranties of Encore contained in
the merger agreement being materially true and correct as of the
date of the merger agreement and as of the closing date;
|
|
|
|
other representations and warranties of Encore contained in the
merger agreement being true and correct as of the date of the
merger agreement and as of the closing date, except where the
failure of any such representations and warranties to be so true
and correct would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a
material adverse effect;
|
|
|
|
performance in all material respects by Encore of all of its
covenants required to be performed by it under the merger
agreement at or prior to the closing date;
|
|
|
|
receipt by Denbury of a certificate signed on behalf of Encore
by an executive officer to the effect that the conditions
specified in the preceding three items have been satisfied;
|
|
|
|
the receipt by Denbury of an opinion from its legal counsel,
dated as of the closing date, to the effect that for federal
income tax purposes (i) the merger will be treated as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code and (ii) each of Denbury and Encore will be a party to
the reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b) of
the Code;
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
the absence of any change in the condition (financial or
otherwise), operations, business or properties of Encore and its
subsidiaries that constitutes or is reasonably likely to
constitute a material adverse effect; and
|
|
|
|
Denburys receipt of the financing contemplated by the
merger agreement (this condition will be considered satisfied if
a failure by the lenders to make the financing available is a
result of a breach by Denbury of any of its obligations under
the merger agreement).
|
Termination,
Amendment and Waiver
Termination
The merger agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the
effective time of the merger, notwithstanding the adoption of
the merger agreement by stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written agreement of Denbury and Encore;
|
|
|
|
by either Denbury or Encore if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the merger has not occurred on or before the outside
date, which is May 31, 2010, but neither party may
terminate the merger agreement under this provision if that
partys breach of any provision of the merger agreement has
contributed to, or otherwise resulted in, the failure of the
merger to occur on or before the outside date;
|
|
|
|
a court of competent jurisdiction or other governmental
authority has issued a final, non-appealable order, decree or
ruling permanently restraining, enjoining or otherwise
prohibiting the merger;
|
|
|
|
the Encore stockholders have failed to adopt the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
the Denbury stockholders have failed to adopt the merger
agreement; or
|
|
|
|
the Denbury financing condition is not satisfied;
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Denbury if Encore is in material breach of the merger
agreement such that certain conditions set forth in the merger
agreement are not capable of being satisfied and that breach is
not cured prior to the earlier of 30 days after notice of
the breach to Encore and the outside date, but Denbury will have
no right to terminate the merger agreement under this provision
if Denbury is then in material breach with respect to its
obligations under the merger agreement; or
|
|
|
|
by Encore if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury is in material breach of the merger agreement such that
certain conditions set forth in the merger agreement are not
capable of being satisfied and that breach is not cured prior to
the earlier of 30 days after notice of the breach to
Denbury and the outside date, but Encore will have no right to
terminate the merger agreement under this provision if it is
then in material breach with respect to its obligations under
the merger agreement; or
|
|
|
|
prior to adoption of the merger agreement by Encores
stockholders, Encores board of directors has effected a
change in its recommendation and authorized Encore to enter into
a definitive agreement with respect to a superior proposal.
|
Fees
and Expenses
The merger agreement provides for the payment of termination
fees by one party to the other if the agreement is terminated in
specified circumstances.
Encore will be obligated to pay Denbury a $60 million
termination fee if either party terminates the merger agreement
because Encores stockholders do not adopt the merger
agreement at the Encore stockholders meeting.
105
Denbury will be obligated to pay Encore a $60 million
termination fee if either party terminates the merger agreement
because Denburys stockholders do not adopt the merger
agreement at the Denbury stockholders meeting.
Encore will be obligated to pay a $120 million termination
fee to Denbury if:
|
|
|
|
|
Encore terminates the merger agreement prior to obtaining the
approval of Encores stockholders because Encores
board of directors authorizes Encore to enter into a binding
definitive agreement in respect of a superior proposal;
|
|
|
|
either party terminates the merger agreement because
Encores stockholder approval is not obtained and:
|
|
|
|
|
|
at the time of Encores stockholders meeting there is a
publicly announced or disclosed acquisition proposal by another
bidder; and
|
|
|
|
within 12 months after the date of the Encore stockholders
meeting, a transaction constituting an acquisition proposal is
consummated or Encore enters into an agreement with respect to a
transaction constituting an acquisition proposal that is
consummated; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury terminates the merger agreement because Encore
materially breached any of its representations and warranties in
the merger agreement and that breach has not been waived or
cured or because the merger was not consummated on or before the
outside date and:
|
|
|
|
|
|
at the time of that termination there is a publicly announced or
disclosed acquisition proposal by another bidder; and
|
|
|
|
within 12 months after the date of the Encore stockholders
meeting, a transaction constituting an acquisition proposal is
consummated or Encore enters into an agreement with respect to a
transaction constituting an acquisition proposal that is
consummated.
|
Denbury will be obligated to pay a $120 million termination
fee to Encore if:
|
|
|
|
|
either party terminates the merger agreement because
Denburys stockholders do not adopt the merger agreement
and:
|
|
|
|
|
|
at the time of the Denbury stockholders meeting there is a
publicly announced or disclosed acquisition proposal for Denbury
by another bidder; and
|
|
|
|
within 12 months after the date of the Denbury stockholders
meeting, a transaction constituting an acquisition proposal for
Denbury is consummated or Denbury enters into an agreement with
respect to a transaction constituting an acquisition proposal
for Denbury that is consummated; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
Encore terminates the merger agreement because Denbury
materially breached any of its representations and warranties in
the merger agreement and that breach has not been waived or
cured or because the merger was not consummated on or before the
outside date and:
|
|
|
|
|
|
at the time of that termination there is a publicly announced or
disclosed acquisition proposal for Denbury;
|
|
|
|
within 12 months after the date of the Denbury stockholders
meeting, a transaction constituting an acquisition proposal for
Denbury is consummated or Denbury enters into an agreement with
respect to a transaction constituting an acquisition proposal
for Denbury that is consummated; and
|
|
|
|
Encore does not receive a $300 million termination fee
related to the failure of Denbury to obtain financing.
|
Denbury will be obligated to pay a $300 million termination
fee to Encore if:
|
|
|
|
|
either party terminates the merger agreement because
Denburys stockholders do not adopt the merger agreement at
the Denbury stockholders meeting;
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury does not at the time of the Denbury stockholders meeting
have a right to terminate the merger agreement because of an
Encore material breach, the rejection of the merger by
Encores stockholders or an injunction against the
merger; and
|
|
|
|
as of the second business day prior to the date on which
Denburys stockholders meeting is held, either:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury has neither entered into binding definitive agreements
for the financing, provided a letter from the financing sources
that they expect the financing to be available nor reaffirmed
its own expectation that the financing will be available; or
|
|
|
|
Denbury has entered into definitive agreements for the financing
but one or more conditions to the obligations of the lenders to
consummate the financing on the closing date cannot be satisfied
or waived.
|
Denbury will be obligated to pay a $300 million termination
fee to Encore if:
|
|
|
|
|
either party terminates the merger agreement because the merger
is not consummated by the outside date and all of the closing
conditions other than the Denburys financing condition
have been satisfied or waived on or prior to the date of such
termination; or
|
|
|
|
either party terminates the merger agreement because
Denburys financing condition is not satisfied by the
outside date.
|
If more than one termination fee is payable to a party, then the
amount of any subsequent termination fee will be reduced by the
amount of all termination fees previously paid to such party.
The merger agreement provides that all expenses incurred by the
parties will be borne by the party that has incurred the
expenses, but Encore will be required to reimburse Denbury for
its expenses of up to $10 million if the merger agreement
is terminated:
|
|
|
|
|
by Denbury for Encores uncured material breach;
|
|
|
|
by Encore prior to obtaining the approval of Encores
stockholders because Encores board of directors authorized
Encore to enter into a binding definitive agreement in respect
of a superior proposal;
|
|
|
|
by Denbury or Encore as a result of the failure to consummate
the merger by the outside date and a bona fide acquisition
proposal for Encore has also been publicly announced but not
timely withdrawn prior to Encores stockholders
meeting; or
|
|
|
|
by Denbury or Encore because the Encore stockholders approval is
not obtained at the Encore stockholders meeting and a bona fide
acquisition proposal for Encore has been publicly announced but
not timely withdrawn prior to Encores stockholders meeting.
|
To obtain reimbursement, Denbury will be required to deliver
itemization of expenses within 10 business days following the
termination of the merger agreement, with further updates and
supplements to such itemization accepted until the 60th day
after termination of the merger agreement. If Encore is required
to reimburse Denbury for any of its expenses, that amount will
be credited against any termination fee.
Amendment. Prior to the effective time of the
merger, the merger agreement may be amended at any time in
writing by action of the parties respective boards of
directors. However, if the merger agreement has been adopted by
stockholders, then no amendment can be made that by law requires
the further approval of stockholders without receipt of that
further approval.
Waiver. At any time prior to the effective
time of the merger, each of Denbury and Encore may:
|
|
|
|
|
extend the time for the performance of any obligations of the
other party;
|
|
|
|
waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties of
the other party; or
|
|
|
|
waive compliance with any agreement or condition for the benefit
of that party.
|
107
MATERIAL
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER
General
The following discussion summarizes certain material
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger to
U.S. holders (as defined below) of Encore common stock and
is the opinion of Baker & Hostetler LLP and Baker
Botts L.L.P. insofar as it relates to matters of
U.S. federal income tax law and legal conclusions with
respect to those matters. The opinions of counsel are included
as exhibits to the registration statement of which this joint
proxy statement/prospectus forms a part. The opinions of counsel
are dependent on the accuracy of the statements, representations
and assumptions upon which the opinions are based and are
subject to the limitations, qualifications and assumptions set
forth below and in the opinions. The following summary is not
binding on the Internal Revenue Service. It is based upon the
Code, and the regulations, rulings and decisions thereunder in
effect as of the date hereof, all of which are subject to
change, possibly with retroactive effect, and to differing
interpretations. This summary addresses only those stockholders
who hold their shares of Encore common stock as a capital asset
and does not address all of the U.S. federal income tax
consequences that may be relevant to particular Encore
stockholders in light of their particular circumstances, or to
Encore stockholders who are subject to special rules, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
financial institutions;
|
|
|
|
mutual funds;
|
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations;
|
|
|
|
insurance companies;
|
|
|
|
S corporations, partnerships or other pass-through entities
for U.S. federal income tax purposes;
|
|
|
|
dealers in securities or foreign currencies;
|
|
|
|
traders in securities who elect to apply a
mark-to-market
method of accounting;
|
|
|
|
holders who are not U.S. holders, as defined below;
|
|
|
|
persons who hold shares of Encore common stock as a hedge
against currency risk or as part of a straddle, constructive
sale or conversion transaction; or
|
|
|
|
holders who acquired their shares of Encore common stock upon
the exercise of warrants or employee stock options or otherwise
as compensation.
|
In addition, tax consequences under state, local and foreign
laws and U.S. federal laws other than U.S. federal
income tax laws are not addressed herein. Encore stockholders
are urged to consult their tax advisors as to the specific tax
consequences of the merger to them, including the applicability
and effect of U.S. federal, state, local and foreign income
and other tax laws in their particular circumstances.
For purposes of this discussion, a U.S. holder means a
beneficial owner of Encore common stock who is:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in
or under the laws of the United States or any political
subdivision thereof;
|
|
|
|
an estate the income of which is includible in gross income for
U.S. federal income tax purposes regardless of its
source; or
|
|
|
|
a trust if (1) a court within the United States is able to
exercise primary supervision over the administration of the
trust and one or more United States persons have the authority
to control all substantial decisions of the trust or
(2) the trust has a valid election in effect under
applicable Treasury regulations to be treated as a
U.S. person.
|
The U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger to a
partner in any entity or arrangement that is treated as a
partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes and holds
Encore common stock generally will
108
depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the
partnership. Partners in a partnership that hold Encore common
stock should consult their own tax advisors as to the specific
tax consequences of the merger to them.
Certain
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger
It is a condition to the closing of the merger that
Baker & Hostetler LLP and Baker Botts L.L.P. deliver
opinions, effective as of the date of closing, to Denbury and
Encore, respectively, to the effect that (i) the merger
will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a
reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code and (ii) each of Denbury
and Encore will be a party to the reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code.
Each tax opinion will be based on certain representations made
by Denbury and Encore, including factual representations and
certifications contained in officers certificates to be
delivered at closing by Denbury and Encore. These factual
representations and certifications include representations that
the Section 368 continuity of interest test will be
satisfied requiring that Denbury common stock constitute at
least 40% of the total consideration paid or payable to Encore
stockholders in exchange for their Encore common stock. Each tax
opinion will assume that each of these representations and
certifications is true, correct and complete without regard to
any knowledge limitation. Furthermore, each tax opinion will be
subject to certain other assumptions, limitations and
qualifications. If any of the representations, certifications or
assumptions relied upon in the tax opinions of counsel is
inaccurate, the tax opinions may not be relied upon, and the
discussion below, which assumes that the merger will qualify as
a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the
Code, may not accurately describe the tax consequences of the
merger. If any of these representations or assumptions are
inconsistent with the actual facts, the U.S. federal income
tax treatment of the merger could be adversely affected.
Whether the continuity of interest test will be satisfied
depends primarily upon the market value of the Denbury common
stock either as of (i) the effective date of the merger, if
the effective time of the merger occurs when the New York Stock
Exchange has opened for trading on such effective date, or
(ii) the business day immediately preceding the effective
date of merger, if the effective time of the merger occurs when
the New York Stock Exchange has not yet opened for trading on
such effective date. No assurances can be given that the
continuity of interest test will be met. If the continuity of
interest test is not met, then neither Baker &
Hostetler LLP nor Baker Botts L.L.P. will be able to issue
opinions that the merger constitutes a
reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code. Tax opinions providing that the
merger constitutes a reorganization are a condition precedent to
the obligation of each of Denbury and Encore to complete the
merger, and without such tax opinions or a waiver of such
condition by the parties the merger agreement will terminate.
An opinion of counsel represents counsels best legal
judgment and is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service or
any court. No ruling has been, or will be, sought from the
Internal Revenue Service as to the tax consequences of the
merger.
Assuming that the merger is treated as a
reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, the merger is expected to have
the following U.S. federal income tax consequences to
Encore stockholders.
Encore Stockholders Receiving Only Denbury Common
Stock. No gain or loss will be recognized by an
Encore stockholder as a result of the surrender of shares of
Encore common stock solely in exchange for shares of Denbury
common stock pursuant to the merger, except as discussed below
with respect to cash received instead of a fractional share of
Denbury common stock. The aggregate tax basis of the shares of
Denbury common stock received in the merger (including any
fractional shares of Denbury common stock deemed received) will
be the same as the aggregate tax basis of the shares of Encore
common stock surrendered in exchange for the Denbury common
stock. The holding period of the shares of Denbury common stock
received (including any fractional share of Denbury common stock
deemed received) will include the holding period of shares of
Encore common stock surrendered in exchange for the Denbury
common stock.
109
Encore Stockholders Receiving Only Cash. An
Encore stockholder that does not receive any shares of Denbury
common stock pursuant to the merger will recognize gain or loss
equal to the difference between the amount of cash received and
the holders adjusted tax basis in the shares of Encore
common stock exchanged in the merger. Such gain or loss will
generally be a capital gain or loss and will be a long-term
capital gain or loss to the extent that, at the effective time
of the merger, the holder has a holding period in such Encore
common stock of more than one year. The deductibility of capital
losses is subject to limitations.
Encore Stockholders Receiving Both Cash and Denbury Common
Stock. If an Encore stockholder receives both
Denbury common stock and cash (other than cash received instead
of a fractional share of Denbury common stock) pursuant to the
merger, that holder will recognize gain equal to the lesser of
(a) the amount of cash received (excluding cash received
instead of a fractional share of Denbury common stock) and
(b) the amount by which the sum of the amount of cash
received and the value (as of the effective time of the merger)
of the Denbury common stock received exceeds the holders
adjusted tax basis in the shares of Encore common stock
exchanged in the merger. This gain will be capital gain unless
the holders exchange of Encore common stock for cash and
Denbury common stock has the effect of the distribution of
a dividend. In general, the determination as to whether
the receipt of cash has the effect of a distribution of a
dividend depends upon whether and to what extent the
transactions related to the merger will be deemed to reduce a
holders percentage ownership of Denbury immediately
following the merger. For purposes of that determination, a
holder will be treated as if it first exchanged all of its
Encore common stock solely for Denbury common stock and then a
portion of that stock was immediately redeemed by Denbury for
the cash (excluding cash received instead of a fractional share
of Denbury common stock) that the holder actually received in
the merger. The Internal Revenue Service has indicated that a
reduction in the interest of a minority stockholder that owns a
small number of shares in a publicly and widely held corporation
and that exercises no control over corporate affairs would
result in capital gain (as opposed to dividend) treatment. In
determining whether the receipt of cash has the effect of a
distribution of a dividend, certain constructive ownership rules
must be taken into account. A holder is urged to consult its tax
advisors about the possibility that all or a portion of any cash
received in exchange for Encore common stock will be treated as
a dividend. The capital gain recognized will be long-term
capital gain to the extent that, at the effective time of the
merger, the holder has a holding period in the Encore common
stock exchanged in the merger of more than one year. The
aggregate tax basis to such a holder of the shares of Denbury
common stock received in the merger (including any fractional
share of Denbury common stock deemed received) will be the same
as the aggregate tax basis of the shares of Encore common stock
surrendered in exchange therefor in the merger, increased by the
amount of gain recognized (excluding gain recognized with
respect to cash received in lieu of fractional shares) and
reduced by the amount of cash received (excluding cash received
with respect to fractional shares). The holding period of the
shares of Denbury common stock received (including any
fractional share of Denbury common stock deemed received) will
include the holding period of shares of Encore common stock
surrendered in exchange for the Denbury common stock. If a
holders tax basis in shares of Encore common stock exceeds
the sum of the amount of cash received and the value of the
Denbury common stock received in exchange for the shares of
Encore common stock, such a holder will not recognize loss.
Encore Stockholders Receiving Cash Instead of a Fractional
Share. Encore stockholders who receive cash
instead of fractional shares of Denbury common stock will be
treated as having received the fractional shares in the merger
and then as having exchanged the fractional shares for cash.
These holders will generally recognize gain or loss equal to the
difference between the tax basis allocable to the fractional
shares and the amount of cash received. The gain or loss will be
capital gain or loss and long-term capital gain or loss if the
Encore common stock exchanged has been held for more than one
year at the effective time of the merger. The deductibility of
capital losses is subject to limitations.
Failure
to Qualify as a Reorganization
If the merger is not treated as a reorganization
within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, then each
Encore stockholder will recognize gain or loss equal to the
difference between (1) the sum of the fair market value of
the shares of Denbury common stock and the amount of cash
received pursuant to the merger
110
(including cash received instead of fractional shares of Denbury
common stock) and (2) its adjusted tax basis in the shares
of Encore common stock surrendered in exchange therefor.
Further, if the merger is not treated as a
reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, Encore will be subject to tax
on the deemed sale of its assets to Denbury, with gain or loss
for this purpose measured by the difference between
Encores tax basis in its assets and the fair market value
of the consideration deemed to be received therefor or, in other
words, the cash and shares of Denbury common stock plus
liabilities assumed in the merger, and Denbury will become
liable for any tax liability of Encore resulting from the merger.
Backup
Withholding; Information Reporting
Under U.S. federal income tax laws, the exchange agent will
generally be required to report to an Encore stockholder and to
the Internal Revenue Service any reportable payments made to
such Encore stockholder in the merger, and backup withholding
may apply to such payment. To avoid such backup withholding, an
Encore stockholder must provide the exchange agent a properly
completed Substitute
Form W-9,
signed under penalties of perjury, including such
stockholders current Taxpayer Identification Number, or
TIN, and other certifications. Certain Encore stockholders
(including, among others, corporations) are exempt from these
backup withholding and reporting requirements. Exempt holders
who are not subject to backup withholding should indicate their
exempt status on a Substitute
Form W-9
by entering their correct TIN, marking the appropriate box and
signing and dating the Substitute
Form W-9
in the space provided.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, the tax
liability of a person subject to backup withholding may be
reduced by the amount of tax withheld or a refund from the
Internal Revenue Service may be obtained provided the requisite
information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
The foregoing discussion is not intended to be legal or tax
advice to any particular Encore stockholder. Tax matters
regarding the merger are very complicated and the tax
consequences of the merger to any particular Encore stockholder
will depend on that stockholders particular situation.
Encore stockholders should consult their own tax advisors
regarding the specific tax consequences of the merger, including
tax return reporting requirements, the applicability of federal,
state, local and foreign tax laws and the effect of any proposed
change in the tax laws to them.
COMPARISON
OF STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS
The rights of Denbury stockholders are governed by
Denburys certificate of incorporation and bylaws, each as
amended, and the laws of the State of Delaware, and the rights
of Encore stockholders are governed by Encores certificate
of incorporation and bylaws, each as amended, and the laws of
the State of Delaware. After the merger, some Encore
stockholders will become stockholders of Denbury and accordingly
their rights will be governed by Denburys certificate of
incorporation and bylaws, each as amended, and the laws of the
State of Delaware. While the rights and privileges of Encore
stockholders are, in many instances, comparable to those of the
stockholders of Denbury, there are some differences. These
differences arise from differences between the respective
certificates of incorporation and bylaws of Denbury and Encore.
111
The following discussion summarizes the material differences as
of the date of this document between the rights of Denbury
stockholders and the rights of Encore stockholders. The
following discussion is only a summary and does not purport to
be a complete description of all the differences. Please consult
the respective certificates of incorporation and bylaws of
Denbury and Encore, each as amended, restated, supplemented or
otherwise modified from time to time, for a more complete
understanding of these differences.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
Encore
|
|
Capital Stock
|
Denbury is authorized to issue:
|
|
Encore is authorized to issue:
|
|
|
600,000,000 shares of common stock, of which 262,392,777
were issued and outstanding as of February 3, 2010.
|
|
|
|
144,000,000 shares of common stock, of which 55,542,510
were issued and outstanding as of February 3, 2010.
|
|
|
25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, of which none are
issued and outstanding.
|
|
|
|
5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, of which none are
issued and outstanding.
|
|
Rights Plans
|
|
|
Denbury is not a party to a rights plan.
|
|
|
|
Encore amended its rights plan in connection with entering into
the merger agreement. Neither the completion of the merger nor
any of the transactions contemplated thereby will cause the
rights under the rights plan to become exercisable.
|
|
Number and Term of Directors
|
|
|
The board must consist of between three and fifteen directors,
who are elected annually.
|
|
|
|
The board must consist of between one and fifteen directors, who
are elected annually.
|
|
|
Currently, there are eight directors on the board. There will
not be any change in Denburys board of directors as a
result of the merger.
|
|
|
|
Currently, there are eight directors on the board.
|
|
Supermajority Vote of Directors
|
|
|
Denburys certificate of incorporation provides that the
following matters must be approved by not less than two-thirds
of the members of the board of directors:
|
|
|
|
Neither Encores certificate of incorporation nor its
bylaws require a supermajority vote of directors on any matter.
|
|
|
an acquisition having a purchase price, or a
disposition having a sale price, in excess of 20% of
Denburys total assets;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
any increase or decrease in the total number of
members of the board of directors;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
any amendment to the certificate of incorporation or
bylaws of Denbury;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
any issuance of equity securities or securities
convertible into equity securities (other than pursuant to any
stock option plan or employment benefit and certain other
exceptions);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the creation of any series of preferred stock;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the issuance of any debt securities in excess of 10%
of Denburys total assets; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
any borrowings, other than advances against existing
credit lines, and any increase in existing credit lines, in each
case in excess of 10% of Denburys total assets in respect
of which Denbury is required to grant security for the debt
obligations or any borrowed money.
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
Encore
|
|
Removal of Directors
|
|
|
Any director or the entire board of directors may be removed,
with or without cause, by a vote of the holders of a majority of
the shares entitled to vote on the election of directors.
|
|
|
|
Any director or the entire board of directors may be removed,
with or without cause, by a vote of the holders of a majority of
the shares entitled to vote on the election of directors.
|
|
Stockholder Consents
|
|
|
Denbury stockholders may act by written consent.
|
|
|
|
Encore stockholders may act by written consent.
|
|
Quorum for Stockholder Meetings
|
|
|
The holders of one-third of the issued and outstanding shares
entitled to vote on a matter, present in person or by proxy,
will constitute a quorum at any meeting of stockholders, except
as otherwise provided by law.
|
|
|
|
The holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to
vote on a matter, present in person or by proxy, will constitute
a quorum at any meeting of stockholders, except as otherwise
provided by law.
|
|
Special Meeting of Stockholders
|
|
|
A special meeting of Denbury stockholders may be called by the
board of directors or by holders of stock representing at least
25% of the aggregate voting power of Denburys issued and
outstanding capital stock.
|
|
|
|
A special meeting of Encore stockholders may be called at any
time by the chairman of the board, the president, the board of
directors or holders of at least 10% of all shares entitled to
vote at the meeting.
|
|
Votes Per Share
|
|
|
Each stockholder is entitled to one vote per share.
|
|
|
|
Each stockholder is entitled to one vote per share.
|
|
Stockholder Proxies
|
|
|
No proxy may be voted after three years from its date unless
otherwise provided in the proxy.
|
|
|
|
No proxy may be voted after three years from its date unless
otherwise provided in the proxy.
|
|
Business Combinations
|
|
|
Denburys certificate of incorporation does not contain any
provision requiring a supermajority vote of stockholders for
business combinations. In addition, Denburys certificate
of incorporation contains a provision opting out of the business
combination provisions of Section 203 of the DGCL.
|
|
|
|
Encores certificate of incorporation does not contain any
provision requiring a supermajority vote of stockholders for
business combinations. In addition, Encores certificate
of incorporation contains a provision opting out of the business
combination provisions of Section 203 of the DGCL.
|
|
Director Nominations
|
|
|
Director nominations may be made at an annual meeting of
stockholders (a) pursuant to the notice of
meeting, (b) by or at the direction of Denburys
board of directors or (c) by any stockholder of the
corporation who was a stockholder of record at the record date
for the meeting and who is entitled to vote at the meeting.
|
|
|
|
Director nominations may be made (a) pursuant to Encores
notice of meeting, (b) by or at the direction of Encores
board of directors or (c) by any stockholder who follows the
procedures set forth in Encores bylaws. For a nomination
to be properly made by a stockholder, the stockholder must,
among other things, give timely notice to Encore not later than
the close of business on the 90th day, nor earlier than the
close of business on the 120th day, prior to the first
anniversary of the immediately preceding years annual
meeting.
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
Encore
|
|
Stockholder Proposals
|
|
|
Proposals of business to be considered by the stockholders may
be made at an annual meeting of
stockholders (a) pursuant to the notice of
meeting, (b) by or at the direction of Denburys
board of directors or (c) by any stockholder of the
corporation who was a stockholder of record at the record date
for the meeting and who is entitled to vote at the meeting.
|
|
|
|
Encores certificate of incorporation and bylaws do not
contain any provisions that govern the submission of proposals
by stockholders.
|
|
Bondholder Inspection Rights
|
|
|
The holders of any bonds, debentures or other obligations issued
or to be issued by Denbury have the same right of inspection of
Denburys books, accounts and other records as
Denburys stockholders.
|
|
|
|
Neither Encores certificate of incorporation nor its
bylaws provide bondholders with any inspection rights.
|
|
Charter Amendments
|
|
|
The Denbury certificate of incorporation may be amended upon the
affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock
outstanding as of the record date.
|
|
|
|
The Encore certificate of incorporation may be amended upon the
affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock
outstanding as of the record date.
|
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS
Denbury
2010 Annual Stockholder Meeting and Stockholder
Proposals
Pursuant to regulations issued by the SEC, to be considered for
inclusion in Denburys proxy statement for presentation at
Denburys 2010 annual meeting of stockholders, all
stockholder proposals must have been received by Denbury at its
principal executive offices no later than December 4, 2009.
If a stockholder notifies Denbury after February 17, 2010
of an intent to present a proposal at the 2010 annual meeting of
stockholders, Denbury will have the right to exercise its
discretionary voting authority with respect to such proposal
without including information regarding such proposal in its
proxy materials.
Encore
2010 Annual Stockholder Meeting and Stockholder
Proposals
Encore will hold a 2010 annual meeting of stockholders only if
the merger has not already been completed. If such a meeting is
held, in order to be eligible for inclusion in Encores
proxy statement and form of proxy for such meeting, any
stockholder proposal must have been received at Encores
principal executive office no later than December 4, 2009.
If a stockholder notifies Encore after February 17, 2010 of
an intent to present a proposal at the 2010 annual meeting of
stockholders, Encore will have the right to exercise its
discretionary voting authority with respect to such proposal
without including information regarding such proposal in its
proxy materials. Stockholder proposals must also be otherwise
eligible for inclusion.
EXPERTS
Denbury
The consolidated financial statements and managements
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting (which is included in Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting)
incorporated in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus
by reference to the Denbury Resources Inc. Annual Report on Form
10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008 have been so incorporated in
reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, given on the
authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
114
Certain information with respect to the oil and gas reserves
associated with Denburys oil and gas properties is derived
from the reports of DeGolyer and MacNaughton, an independent
petroleum engineering firm, and has been included in this
document upon the authority of said firm as experts with respect
to the matters covered by such reports and in giving such
reports.
Encore
The consolidated financial statements of Encore Acquisition
Company appearing in Encore Acquisition Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed January 25, 2010 have been audited
by Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, as set forth in their report thereon, included
therein, and incorporated herein by reference. The effectiveness
of Encore Acquisition Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 appearing in
Encore Acquisition Companys Annual Report
(Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2008 has been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting
firm, as set forth in their report thereon, included therein,
and incorporated herein by reference. Such consolidated
financial statements and Encore Acquisition Company
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008
are incorporated herein by reference in reliance upon such
reports given on the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
Certain information with respect to the oil and natural gas
reserves associated with Encores oil and natural gas
properties is derived from the reports of Miller and Lents,
Ltd., an independent petroleum engineering firm, and has been
included in this document upon the authority of said firm as
experts with respect to the matters covered by such reports and
in giving such reports.
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the Denbury common stock offered hereby will be
passed upon for Denbury by Baker & Hostetler LLP. In
addition, Baker & Hostetler LLP and Baker Botts L.L.P.
will deliver opinions to Denbury and Encore, respectively, as to
certain tax matters.
INCORPORATION
OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE
The SEC allows Denbury and Encore to incorporate by
reference business and financial information that is not
included in or delivered with this document, which means that
Denbury or Encore can disclose important information to you by
referring to another document filed separately with the SEC. The
information incorporated by reference is deemed to be part of
this document, except for any information superseded by
information in this document or incorporated by reference
subsequent to the date of this document.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus incorporates by reference
the documents listed below that Denbury and Encore have
previously filed with the SEC.
Denbury
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008;
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2009, June 30, 2009
and September 30, 2009;
|
|
|
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, February 5,
2009, February 6, 2009, February 17, 2009, May 6,
2009, July 7, 2009, November 2, 2009 (dated
November 1, 2009), November 5, 2009 (dated
October 31, 2009), November 13, 2009 (dated
November 12, 2009), December 3, 2009, December 7,
2009 (dated December 1, 2009), December 23, 2009
(dated December 18, 2009), December 23, 2009 (dated
December 17, 2009), January 6, 2010 (dated
December 30, 2009), February 1, 2010 (as amended on
February 2, 2010), February 2, 2010, February 2, 2010,
February 4, 2010 and February 6, 2010; and
|
|
|
|
The description of Denbury common stock set forth in the
Registration Statement on
Form 8-A
(File No. 001-12935)
filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange
Act on April 25,
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
1997, as amended on April 21, 1999, and any amendment or
report filed for the purpose of updating such description.
|
Encore
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008;
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2009, June 30, 2009
and September 30, 2009;
|
|
|
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on February 11, 2009, March 2,
2009, March 11, 2009, April 27, 2009, May 1,
2009, May 19, 2009, June 29, 2009, September 11,
2009, November 2, 2009, November 3, 2009,
December 1, 2009, December 15, 2009, January 25,
2010 and February 1, 2010; and
|
|
|
|
The description of Encore common stock set forth in the
Registration Statement on
Form 8-A
(File No. 001-16295)
filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange
Act on December 21, 2000, and any amendment or report filed
for the purpose of updating such description.
|
|
|
|
The description of rights to purchase Encore preferred stock set
forth in the Registration Statement on
Form 8-A
(File
No. 001-16295)
filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange
Act on October 31, 2008, and the amendment to such
Registration Statement filed on November 6, 2009, as well
as any additional amendment or report filed for the purpose of
updating such description.
|
To the extent that any information contained in any Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
or any exhibit thereto, was furnished to, rather than filed
with, the SEC, such information or exhibit is specifically not
incorporated by reference in this document.
In addition, Denbury and Encore incorporate by reference
additional documents that they may subsequently file with the
SEC under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act between the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and the date this offering of securities is
terminated (other than information furnished and not filed with
the SEC). These documents include periodic reports such as
annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
and current reports on
Form 8-K.
Documents incorporated by reference are available to Denbury
stockholders and Encore stockholders from Denbury or Encore, as
applicable, or the SEC. Documents listed above are available
from Denbury or Encore, as applicable, without charge, excluding
all exhibits unless the exhibits have specifically been
incorporated by reference in this document. Holders of this
document may obtain documents listed above by written or oral
request from the appropriate company at:
If you are a Denbury stockholder:
Denbury Resources Inc.
5100 Tennyson Pkwy., Suite 1200
Plano, TX 75024
Attention: Investor Relations
Telephone:
(972) 673-2000
If you are an Encore stockholder:
Encore Acquisition Company
777 Main Street, Suite 1400
Fort Worth, TX 76102
Attention: Investor Relations
Telephone:
(817) 877-9955
If you would like to request documents from Denbury, please do
so by February 25, 2010 to receive timely delivery of the
documents in advance of the Denbury special meeting. If you
would like to request documents from Encore, please do so by
February 25, 2010 to receive timely delivery of the
documents in advance of the Encore special meeting.
116
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Denbury and Encore file annual, quarterly and current reports,
proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may
read and copy any reports, statements or other information
Denbury and Encore file at the SECs public reference room
located at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C.
20549. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the public reference room. These SEC
filings are also available to the public at the website
maintained by the SEC at
http://www.sec.gov,
by Denbury
at http://www.denbury.com,
and by Encore at
http://www.encoreacq.com.
Denbury and Encore do not intend for information contained on or
accessible through their respective websites to be part of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus, other than the documents that
Denbury and Encore file with the SEC that are incorporated by
reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Denbury filed a registration statement on
Form S-4
to register with the SEC the Denbury common stock that Denbury
will issue to Encore stockholders in conjunction with the
merger. This document is part of that registration statement and
constitutes a prospectus of Denbury in addition to being a proxy
statement for Denbury for Denburys special meeting and a
proxy statement for Encore for Encores special meeting. As
allowed by SEC rules, this joint proxy statement/prospectus does
not contain all of the information you can find in the
registration statement or the exhibits to the registration
statement.
You should rely only on the information contained in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus to vote on the proposals submitted by
the Denbury and Encore boards of directors. Neither Denbury nor
Encore has authorized anyone to provide you with information
that is different from what is contained in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is
dated February 5, 2010. You should not assume that the
information contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus
is accurate as of any date other than such date, and neither the
mailing of this document to Denbury and Encore stockholders nor
the issuance of Denbury common stock in connection with the
merger shall create any implication to the contrary.
Denbury has provided all of the information contained in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus with respect to Denbury, and
Encore has provided all of the information contained in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus with respect to Encore.
If you own Denbury common stock or Encore common stock, please
complete, sign, date and promptly return the enclosed proxy in
the enclosed prepaid envelope. The prompt return of your proxy
will help save additional solicitation expense.
117
GLOSSARY
OF OIL AND GAS TERMS
The following are abbreviations and definitions of certain terms
commonly used in the oil and gas industry and this document:
Bbl. One stock tank barrel of 42
U.S. gallons liquid volume, used in reference to crude oil
or other liquid hydrocarbons.
Bbls/d. Barrels of oil produced per day.
Bcf. One billion cubic feet of gas or
CO2.
BOE. One barrel of oil equivalent, using the
ratio of one barrel of crude oil, condensate or natural gas
liquids to six Mcf of natural gas.
BOE/d. BOE per day.
CO2. Carbon
dioxide.
Development costs.* Costs incurred to obtain
access to proved reserves and to provide facilities for
extracting, treating, gathering and storing the oil and gas.
Development well. A well drilled within the
proved area of an oil or gas reservoir to the depth of a
stratigraphic horizon known to be productive.
Differential. The difference between the net
realized commodity prices received on a per unit basis, as
compared to the actual NYMEX prices posted on a per unit basis.
EOR. Enhanced oil recovery.
Exploration costs.* Costs incurred in
identifying areas that may warrant examination and in examining
specific areas that are considered to have prospects of
containing oil and gas reserves, including costs of drilling
exploratory wells and exploratory-type stratigraphic test wells.
Exploratory well.* A well drilled to find and
produce oil or gas in an unproved area, to find a new reservoir
in a field previously found to be productive of oil or gas in
another reservoir, or to extend a known reservoir.
Field.* An area consisting of a single
reservoir or multiple reservoirs all grouped on or related to
the same individual geological structural feature
and/or
stratigraphic condition.
MBbls. One thousand barrels of crude oil or
other liquid hydrocarbons.
Mcf. One thousand cubic feet of natural gas or
CO2.
MMBbls. One million barrels of crude oil or
other liquid hydrocarbons.
MMBOE. One million BOEs.
MMBtu. One million British thermal units. One
British thermal unit is the amount of heat required to raise the
temperature of a one pound mass of water from 58.5 to 59.5
degrees Fahrenheit.
MMcf. One million cubic feet of natural gas or
CO2.
NYMEX. New York Mercantile Exchange.
Production costs.* Costs incurred to operate
and maintain wells and related equipment and facilities,
including depreciation and applicable operating costs of support
equipment and facilities and other costs of operating and
maintaining those wells and related equipment and facilities.
Proved developed reserves.* Crude oil,
natural gas and natural gas liquids reserves that can be
expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing
equipment and operating methods.
Proved properties. Properties with proved
reserves.
118
Proved
reserves.*
The estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas, and natural
gas liquids that geological and engineering data demonstrate
with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from
known reservoirs under existing economic and operating
conditions, i.e., prices and costs as of the date the estimate
is made.
Proved undeveloped reserves.* Reserves that
are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage
or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is
required.
PV-10
Value. When used with respect to oil and natural
gas reserves,
PV-10 Value
means the estimated future gross revenue to be generated from
the production of proved reserves, net of estimated future
production, development and abandonment costs, using prices and
costs in effect at the determination date and before income
taxes, discounted to a present value using an annual discount
rate of 10%.
PV-10 Value
is a non-GAAP measure.
Reserve life. A measure of the productive life
of an oil and gas property or a group of properties, expressed
in years. Reserve life is calculated by dividing proved reserve
volumes at year-end by production for that year.
Reservoir. A porous and permeable underground
formation containing a natural accumulation of producible oil
and/or gas
that is confined by impermeable rock or water barriers and is
individual and separate from other reservoirs.
Standardized Measure. The present value,
discounted at 10% per year, of estimated future net revenues
from the production of proved reserves, computed by applying
sales prices in effect as of the dates of such estimates and
held constant throughout the productive life of the reserves
(except for consideration of price changes to the extent
provided by contractual arrangements) and deducting the
estimated future costs to be incurred in developing, producing
and abandoning the proved reserves (computed based on current
costs and assuming continuation of existing economic
conditions). Future income taxes are calculated by applying the
statutory federal and state income tax rate to pre-tax future
net cash flows, net of the tax basis of the properties involved
and utilization of available tax carryforwards related to oil
and gas operations.
Stratigraphic test well.* A drilling effort,
geologically directed, to obtain information pertaining to a
specific geologic condition. Such wells customarily are drilled
without the intention of being completed for hydrocarbon
production.
Tertiary recovery operations. An enhanced
recovery operation that normally occurs after waterflooding, in
which chemicals or natural gases
(CO2)
are used as the injectant.
|
|
|
* |
|
This definition is an abbreviated version of the complete
definition as defined by the SEC in
Rule 4-10(a)
of
Regulation S-X.
For the complete definition see:
http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=2
0c66c74f60c4bb8392bcf9ad6fccea3&rgn=div5&view=text&nod-e=17:2.0.1.1.8&idno=17#17:2.0.1.1.8.0.21.43. |
119
DENBURY
RESOURCES INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following unaudited pro forma combined financial information
is based on the historical consolidated financial statements of
Denbury Resources Inc. (Denbury) and Encore
Acquisition Company (Encore), adjusted to reflect
the proposed acquisition of Encore by Denbury and the related
financing transactions. Denburys historical consolidated
financial statements have also been adjusted to give effect to
the disposal of its Barnett Shale natural gas assets as
presented in Note 4 to the unaudited pro forma combined
financial information.
The unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet gives effect to
the acquisition of Encore by Denbury, the related financing
transactions and the disposition by Denbury of its remaining 40%
interest in its Barnett Shale natural gas assets (see
Note 4), as if they had occurred on September 30,
2009. The unaudited pro forma combined statements of operations
combine the results of operations of Denbury and Encore for the
year ended December 31, 2008 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. The unaudited pro forma combined
statements of operations give effect to the following events as
if they had occurred on January 1, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Denburys acquisition of Encore. The acquisition of Encore
will be accounted for using the acquisition method of
accounting. Encore owns the general partner interest and
approximately 46% of the outstanding common units of Encore
Energy Partners LP (ENP). Encore has historically
consolidated the financial position, results of operations and
cash flows of ENP with those of Encore. The unaudited pro forma
combined financial information reflects the allocation of
(1) the fair value of the consideration transferred and
(2) the fair value of the noncontrolling interest of ENP to
the underlying assets acquired and liabilities assumed of both
Encore and ENP based upon their estimated fair values;
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under Denburys newly committed
$1.6 billion credit facility (approximately
$826.6 million) and $1.25 billion bridge facility
(approximately $400.0 million). The newly committed credit
facility and bridge facility borrowings and proceeds will be
used as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
fund the aggregate cash portion of the purchase price
(approximately $889.3 million), including payments to
Encore option holders of approximately $56.2 million;
|
|
|
|
repay a portion of Encores credit facilities
($180.0 million); and
|
|
|
|
pay debt and equity issuance costs (approximately
$89.5 million), severance costs (approximately
$39.6 million) and transaction expenses (approximately
$28.1 million) related to the acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to conform the classification of expenses in
Encores historical statements of operations to
Denburys classification of similar expenses;
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to conform Encores historical accounting
policies related to oil and natural gas properties from
successful efforts to full cost accounting;
|
|
|
|
Estimated tax impact of pro forma adjustments; and
|
|
|
|
Denburys disposition of its Barnett Shale natural gas
assets (see Note 4 to the unaudited pro forma combined
financial information).
|
The unaudited pro forma combined statements of operations
exclude the impact of nonrecurring expenses Denbury and Encore
will incur as a result of the acquisition and related
financings, primarily non-capitalizable banking and legal fees.
F-2
The unaudited pro forma combined financial information should be
read in conjunction with the respective
Forms 10-K
of Denbury and Encore for the year ended December 31, 2008,
the respective
Forms 10-Q
of Denbury and Encore for the quarter ended September 30,
2009, Encores Current Report on Form 8-K filed
January 25, 2010 and other information that both companies
have filed with the SEC and incorporated by reference into this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The unaudited pro forma combined financial information is for
informational purposes only and is not intended to represent or
to be indicative of the combined results of operations or
financial position that Denbury or the pro forma combined
company would have reported had the Encore acquisition been
completed as of the dates set forth in this unaudited pro forma
combined financial information and should not be taken as
indicative of Denburys future combined results of
operations or financial position. The actual results may differ
significantly from that reflected in the unaudited pro forma
combined financial information for a number of reasons,
including, but not limited to, differences between the
assumptions used to prepare the unaudited pro forma combined
financial information and actual results.
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Encore
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(Note 4)
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
(Note 2)
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
211,689
|
|
|
$
|
6,683
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
218,372
|
|
Trade, accrued production and other receivables, net
|
|
|
168,931
|
|
|
|
113,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,236
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
17,900
|
|
|
|
51,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,874
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
5,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,637
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,704
|
|
|
|
432
|
(a)
|
|
|
42,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
404,157
|
|
|
|
213,666
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
618,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
3,258,060
|
|
|
|
4,146,881
|
|
|
|
(946,202
|
)(a)
|
|
|
6,458,739
|
|
Unevaluated
|
|
|
213,170
|
|
|
|
104,931
|
|
|
|
1,071,069
|
(a)
|
|
|
1,389,170
|
|
CO2
properties, equipment and pipelines
|
|
|
1,422,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,422,981
|
|
Other
|
|
|
80,015
|
|
|
|
28,598
|
|
|
|
(15,360
|
)(a)
|
|
|
93,253
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(1,763,902
|
)
|
|
|
(1,001,449
|
)
|
|
|
1,001,449
|
(a)
|
|
|
(1,763,902
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment
|
|
|
3,210,324
|
|
|
|
3,278,961
|
|
|
|
1,110,956
|
|
|
|
7,600,241
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,694
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
138,830
|
|
|
|
60,606
|
|
|
|
(60,606
|
)(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,089,338
|
(a)
|
|
|
1,228,168
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
52,343
|
|
|
|
112,887
|
|
|
|
(37,708
|
)(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,806
|
(b)
|
|
|
215,328
|
|
Investment in Genesis
|
|
|
77,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,883,260
|
|
|
$
|
3,713,814
|
|
|
$
|
2,190,218
|
|
|
$
|
9,787,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
188,420
|
|
|
$
|
142,541
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
330,961
|
|
Oil and gas production payable
|
|
|
86,038
|
|
|
|
16,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,696
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
|
74,614
|
|
|
|
37,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,852
|
|
Deferred revenue Genesis
|
|
|
4,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,070
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,968
|
|
|
|
(63,968
|
)(a)
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
4,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,698
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
357,840
|
|
|
|
275,607
|
|
|
|
(63,968
|
)
|
|
|
569,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt Genesis
|
|
|
250,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,681
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
925,380
|
|
|
|
1,243,496
|
|
|
|
35,755
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(180,000
|
)(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,226,552
|
(d)
|
|
|
3,251,183
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
47,149
|
|
|
|
51,664
|
|
|
|
(14,732
|
)(a)
|
|
|
84,081
|
|
Deferred revenue Genesis
|
|
|
16,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,796
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
458,940
|
|
|
|
431,075
|
|
|
|
439,038
|
(a)
|
|
|
1,329,053
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
|
12,496
|
|
|
|
39,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,866
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
23,319
|
|
|
|
3,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
1,734,761
|
|
|
|
1,769,442
|
|
|
|
1,506,613
|
|
|
|
5,010,816
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity before noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
1,790,659
|
|
|
|
1,394,047
|
|
|
|
(1,394,047
|
)(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,947,216
|
(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,084
|
)(g)
|
|
|
3,709,791
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274,718
|
|
|
|
(274,718
|
)(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497,206
|
(a)
|
|
|
497,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
1,790,659
|
|
|
|
1,668,765
|
|
|
|
747,573
|
|
|
|
4,206,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
3,883,260
|
|
|
$
|
3,713,814
|
|
|
$
|
2,190,218
|
|
|
$
|
9,787,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Encore
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(Note 4)
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
(Note 3)
|
|
|
(Note 3)
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues and other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil, natural gas and related product sales
|
|
$
|
538,112
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
461,823
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
999,935
|
|
CO2
sales and transportation fees
|
|
|
9,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,708
|
|
Interest income and other
|
|
|
1,948
|
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
2,104
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,863
|
|
Oil revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
374,915
|
|
|
|
(374,915
|
)(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,908
|
|
|
|
(86,908
|
)(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,008
|
|
|
|
(2,008
|
)(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
549,768
|
|
|
|
465,642
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,015,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
|
228,141
|
|
|
|
122,817
|
|
|
|
6,538
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,082
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
366,578
|
|
Production taxes and marketing expenses
|
|
|
19,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,992
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,101
|
(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,612
|
(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,651
|
|
Transportation expense Genesis
|
|
|
6,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,143
|
|
CO2
operating expenses
|
|
|
3,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,442
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
79,828
|
|
|
|
40,743
|
|
|
|
1,377
|
(g)
|
|
|
(5,142
|
)(k)
|
|
|
116,806
|
|
Interest, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
34,095
|
|
|
|
57,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,586
|
(l)
|
|
|
139,690
|
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
163,275
|
|
|
|
217,361
|
|
|
|
1,798
|
(h)
|
|
|
(12,289
|
)(j)
|
|
|
370,145
|
|
Commodity derivative expense (income)
|
|
|
177,061
|
|
|
|
(741
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,320
|
|
Production, ad valorem, and severance taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,074
|
|
|
|
(48,074
|
)(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,801
|
)(i)
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
|
|
(1,612
|
)(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,419
|
|
|
|
96
|
(b)
|
|
|
(7,701
|
)(i)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,538
|
)(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,101
|
)(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,377
|
)(g)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,798
|
)(h)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
711,931
|
|
|
|
560,095
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(20,347
|
)
|
|
|
1,251,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net income of Genesis
|
|
|
5,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(156,361
|
)
|
|
|
(94,453
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,347
|
|
|
|
(230,467
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(60,362
|
)
|
|
|
(25,254
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,630
|
(m)
|
|
|
(77,986
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income (loss)
|
|
|
(95,999
|
)
|
|
|
(69,199
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,717
|
|
|
|
(152,481
|
)
|
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,669
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,107
|
)(n)
|
|
|
(10,776
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders
|
|
$
|
(95,999
|
)
|
|
$
|
(59,530
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,824
|
|
|
$
|
(141,705
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share basic
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
Net loss per common share diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
246,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,980
|
(o)
|
|
|
370,136
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
246,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,980
|
(o)
|
|
|
370,136
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Encore
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(Note 4)
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
(Note 3)
|
|
|
(Note 3)
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues and other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil, natural gas and related product sales
|
|
$
|
1,112,149
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,124,922
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,237,071
|
|
CO2
sales and transportation fees
|
|
|
13,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,858
|
|
Interest income and other
|
|
|
4,834
|
|
|
|
3,898
|
|
|
|
10,972
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,704
|
|
Oil revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
897,443
|
|
|
|
(897,443
|
)(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,479
|
|
|
|
(227,479
|
)(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,496
|
|
|
|
(10,496
|
)(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
1,130,841
|
|
|
|
1,139,316
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,270,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense
|
|
|
283,509
|
|
|
|
175,115
|
|
|
|
14,151
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472,775
|
|
Production taxes and marketing expenses
|
|
|
43,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,493
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,375
|
(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,570
|
(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,582
|
|
Transportation expense Genesis
|
|
|
7,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,982
|
|
CO2
operating expenses
|
|
|
4,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,216
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
60,374
|
|
|
|
48,421
|
|
|
|
1,391
|
(g)
|
|
|
(4,253
|
)(k)
|
|
|
105,933
|
|
Interest, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
29,003
|
|
|
|
73,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,349
|
(l)
|
|
|
157,525
|
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
177,540
|
|
|
|
228,252
|
|
|
|
1,361
|
(h)
|
|
|
(3,244
|
)(j)
|
|
|
403,909
|
|
Commodity derivative income
|
|
|
(200,053
|
)
|
|
|
(346,236
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(546,289
|
)
|
Abandoned acquisition cost
|
|
|
30,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,601
|
|
Ceiling test write-down
|
|
|
226,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,000
|
|
Production, ad valorem, and severance taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,644
|
|
|
|
(110,644
|
)(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,526
|
|
Exploration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,207
|
)(i)
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,570
|
|
|
|
(9,570
|
)(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,959
|
|
|
|
(11,375
|
)(e)
|
|
|
(1,308
|
)(i)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,391
|
)(g)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,361
|
)(h)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
476
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
662,316
|
|
|
|
412,631
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
7,337
|
|
|
|
1,082,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net income of Genesis
|
|
|
5,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
473,879
|
|
|
|
726,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,337
|
)
|
|
|
1,193,227
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
178,699
|
|
|
|
241,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,752
|
)(m)
|
|
|
417,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income (loss)
|
|
|
295,180
|
|
|
|
485,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,585
|
)
|
|
|
775,659
|
|
Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,373
|
)(n)
|
|
|
50,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders
|
|
$
|
295,180
|
|
|
$
|
430,812
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,212
|
)
|
|
$
|
724,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.97
|
|
Net income per common share diluted
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.92
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
243,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,980
|
(o)
|
|
|
367,915
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
252,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,980
|
(o)
|
|
|
376,510
|
|
F-6
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Note 1
|
Basis of
Presentation
|
On October 31, 2009, Denbury and Encore entered into a
definitive merger agreement which contemplates the merger of
Encore with and into Denbury, with Denbury surviving the merger.
Under the merger agreement, Encore stockholders will receive
$50.00 per share for each share of Encore common stock,
comprised of $15.00 in cash and $35.00 in Denbury common stock
subject to both an election feature and a collar mechanism on
the stock portion of the consideration. The final number of
Denbury shares to be issued will be adjusted based on the
volume-weighted average price of Denbury common stock on the
NYSE for the
twenty-day
trading period ending on the second day prior to closing. Based
on the collar mechanism, if Denbury common stock trades between
$13.29 and $16.91, the Encore stockholders electing to receive a
mix of cash and stock and non-electing stockholders will receive
$15.00 in cash and between 2.0698 and 2.6336 shares of
Denbury common stock for each of their shares of Encore common
stock, but not higher or lower than these share amounts if
Denbury common stock trades outside this range. In the
aggregate, assuming 55.5 million shares of Encore common
stock are outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of
the merger (the number of Encore outstanding common shares at
January 13, 2010) and including approximately
$56.2 million in cash payments to Encore stock option
holders, this represents aggregate merger consideration of
approximately $889.3 million in cash and between 115 and
146 million shares of Denbury common stock. If Denbury
common stock trades outside of this range, the number of Denbury
common shares that will be issued to effect the acquisition will
be fixed at the minimum (approximately 115 million Denbury
common shares) or maximum (approximately 146 million
Denbury common shares) as determined by the collar mechanism.
The unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet as of
September 30, 2009 assumes that Encore stockholders will
receive 2.232 shares of Denbury common stock for each share
of Encore common stock (approximately 124.0 million common
shares in the aggregate), the ratio of which was determined
using an estimated volume-weighted average price of Denbury
common stock of $15.68 per share for the
twenty-day
trading period ending on January 13, 2010.
Denbury received a financing commitment letter from
J.P. Morgan and JPMorgan Chase subject to certain funding
conditions, for a proposed new $1.6 billion senior secured
revolving credit facility with a term of four years (Newly
Committed Credit Facility) and a $1.25 billion bridge
facility (Bridge Facility) that will be available to
the extent Denbury does not secure alternate financing prior to
the end of the bridge take-down period. The unaudited pro forma
combined financial information assumes that only a portion of
the Newly Committed Credit Facility and Bridge Facility have
been drawn upon to effect the transaction described herein, and
that the proceeds from the portions drawn will be used as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Sources:
|
|
|
|
|
Bridge Facility
Borrowings(1)
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
Newly Committed Credit Facility
Borrowings(2)
|
|
|
826,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Sources of Cash
|
|
$
|
1,226,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uses:
|
|
|
|
|
Fund cash portion of purchase
price(3)
|
|
$
|
889,322
|
|
Repay a portion of Encores credit facilities
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
Pay debt, equity and transaction costs
|
|
|
117,640
|
|
Pay Encores severance costs
|
|
|
39,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Uses of Cash
|
|
$
|
1,226,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Bridge Facility will be a $1.25 billion facility. |
|
(2) |
|
The Newly Committed Credit Facility will be a $1.6 billion
facility. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes payments to Encore option holders of $56.2 million. |
F-7
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION Continued
The accompanying unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet at
September 30, 2009 has been prepared to give effect to the
merger and the related financing transactions as if they had
occurred on September 30, 2009 and the unaudited pro forma
combined statements of operations have been prepared to give
effect to the merger and the related financing transactions as
if they had occurred on January 1, 2008.
The unaudited pro forma combined financial information includes
adjustments to conform Encores accounting for oil and gas
properties to the full cost method. Denbury follows the full
cost method of accounting for oil and gas properties while
Encore follows the successful efforts method of accounting for
oil and gas properties. Certain costs that are capitalized under
the full cost method are expensed under the successful efforts
method. These costs consist primarily of unsuccessful
exploration drilling costs, geological and geophysical costs,
delay rental on leases, abandonment costs and general and
administrative expenses directly related to exploration and
development activities. Under the successful efforts method of
accounting, proved property acquisition costs are amortized on a
unit-of-production
basis over total proved reserves and costs of wells, related
equipment and facilities are depreciated over the life of the
proved developed reserves that will utilize those capitalized
assets on a
field-by-field
basis. Under the full cost method of accounting, property
acquisition costs, costs of wells, related equipment and
facilities and future development costs are included in a single
full cost pool, which is amortized on a
unit-of-production
basis over total proved reserves.
Denburys unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
balance sheet and statements of operations, which are included
in the unaudited pro forma combined financial information, also
include the pro forma effects of the disposal of its Barnett
Shale natural gas assets that occurred during 2009.
Denburys unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
balance sheet includes the pro forma effect of the sale of the
remaining 40% of Denburys Barnett Shale natural gas assets
as if the sale occurred on September 30, 2009.
Denburys unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
statements of operations include the pro forma effects of the
sale of 60%, and subsequent sale of 40%, of Denburys
Barnett Shale natural gas assets as if the sales occurred on
January 1, 2008. Denburys disposal of its Barnett
Shale natural gas assets is unrelated to the Encore acquisition.
The pro forma effects of these transactions are presented in
Note 4 to the unaudited pro forma combined financial
information.
F-8
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION Continued
Effect
of Modified Assumption on Repurchase of Encore Senior
Subordinated Notes
Each of Encores four series of senior subordinated notes
has a change in control put option at 101% of par value, which
would require Denbury to offer to repurchase, at the option of
the noteholder, the notes at 101% of par value within a
specified period after consummation of the merger. Three of
these series, Encores 6% Senior Subordinated Notes,
its 6.25% Senior Subordinated Notes and its
7.25% Senior Subordinated Notes (collectively
Encores Old Notes) with an aggregate par value
of $600 million, have traded at prices below 101% of par
value both before and since announcement of the merger. Because
it would be economically advantageous to the noteholders to do
so, Denbury expects the holders of all of Encores Old
Notes to exercise their contractual put options.
If Denbury were to assume exercise of their put options by the
holders of all of Encores Old Notes, requiring Denbury to
repurchase all of Encores Old Notes at 101% of par value,
and the repurchase is funded through additional borrowings on
Denburys Bridge Facility, it would (i) incrementally
increase pro forma interest expense by an additional amount of
approximately $14 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and $18 million for the twelve
months ended December 31, 2008, and (ii) increase
Denburys pro forma long-term debt as of September 30,
2009 by approximately $17 million. All or a portion of
borrowings under the Bridge Facility assumed in the unaudited
pro forma combined financial information (or under the modified
assumption herein) may, as an alternative, be financed through
Denburys intended public or private issuance of up to
$1.0 billion of senior subordinated notes or other
available financing alternatives. If used in place of Bridge
Facility financing, such alternative senior subordinated debt is
expected, based on current market conditions, to bear an
interest rate which would slightly reduce pro forma interest
expense reflected herein for borrowings under the Bridge
Facility.
|
|
Note 2
|
Unaudited
Pro forma Combined Balance Sheet
|
The acquisition of Encore will be accounted for using the
acquisition method of accounting. Denbury will receive carryover
tax basis in Encores assets and liabilities because the
merger will not be a taxable transaction under the United States
Internal Revenue Code. The sum of the estimated fair value of
consideration transferred and the estimated fair value of the
noncontrolling interest of ENP was allocated based on a
preliminary assessment of the estimated fair value of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed at September 30, 2009
using currently available information. Denbury expects to
finalize its allocation of the purchase consideration as soon
after completion of the proposed acquisition as practicable. The
final purchase price allocation and the resulting effect on
results of operations and financial position may significantly
differ from the pro forma amounts included herein.
The purchase price allocation is preliminary and is subject to
change due to several factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the estimated number of shares of Denbury common
stock issued if Denburys common stock trades within the
collar mechanism;
|
|
|
|
changes in the estimated fair value of the stock consideration
transferred depending on its estimated fair value at the date of
closing (i.e. last trading price);
|
|
|
|
changes in the estimated fair value of the noncontrolling
interest of ENP resulting from changes in ENPs common unit
price at the merger closing date;
|
|
|
|
changes in the estimated fair values of Encores assets and
liabilities as of the acquisition date, which could result from
changes in expected future product prices, changes in reserve
estimates as well as other changes; and
|
|
|
|
the tax basis of Encores assets and liabilities at the
acquisition date.
|
F-9
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION Continued
The consideration to be transferred, fair value of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed and resulting goodwill was
calculated as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma consideration and noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of Denbury common stock to be
issued(1)
|
|
$
|
1,948,966
|
|
Cash payment to Encore
stockholders(2)
|
|
|
889,322
|
|
Severance payments
|
|
|
39,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma consideration
|
|
|
2,877,878
|
|
Fair value of noncontrolling interest of
ENP(3)
|
|
|
497,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma consideration and noncontrolling interest of
ENP(4)
|
|
$
|
3,375,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: fair value of liabilities assumed
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
142,541
|
|
Oil and gas production payable
|
|
|
16,658
|
|
Current derivative liabilities
|
|
|
37,238
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
15,202
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,279,251
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
36,932
|
|
Long-term derivative liabilities
|
|
|
39,370
|
|
Long-term deferred tax liability
|
|
|
870,113
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
3,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount attributable to liabilities assumed
|
|
$
|
2,441,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: fair value of assets acquired
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
6,683
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
113,305
|
|
Current derivative assets
|
|
|
51,974
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
42,136
|
|
Oil and natural gas properties proved
|
|
|
3,200,679
|
|
Oil and natural gas properties unevaluated
|
|
|
1,176,000
|
|
Other plant, property and equipment
|
|
|
13,238
|
|
Long-term derivative assets
|
|
|
47,694
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
75,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount attributable to assets acquired
|
|
$
|
4,726,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
1,089,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
124.0 million Denbury common shares at $15.72 per share
(closing price as of January 13, 2010). |
|
(2) |
|
55.5 million Encore shares at $15.00 per share plus
cash payment to stock option holders of $56.2 million. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents approximate fair value of the noncontrolling interest
of ENP assuming 45.3 million ENP common units are
outstanding (based on ENP common units outstanding as of
January 13, 2010) at $20.34 per ENP common unit
(closing price as of January 13, 2010). As of
September 30, 2009, Encore owned approximately 46% of
outstanding ENP common units. |
|
(4) |
|
The sum of the pro forma consideration and noncontrolling
interest and the fair value of Encores long-term debt
assumed totals approximately $4.7 billion, representing the
approximate aggregate purchase price, based on currently
available information. |
F-10
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION Continued
Pursuant to the acquisition method of accounting, the fair value
of shares issued is determined using the closing price of
Denbury common stock at the acquisition date. As discussed in
Note 1, Basis of Presentation, the number of
shares that Denbury will issue in the merger transaction is
dependent upon the volume-weighted average price of Denbury
stock for the
twenty-day
period ending on the second day prior to closing. Therefore, the
price of Denbury common stock used to determine the number of
shares that will be issued as consideration will likely be
different than the price of Denburys stock used to
determine the fair value of consideration transferred for
accounting purposes. The pro forma purchase price allocation
assumes Encore stockholders will receive 2.232 shares of
Denbury common stock for each share of Encore common stock
(124.0 million common shares in the aggregate), the ratio
of which was determined using an estimated
twenty-day
volume-weighted average price of Denburys common stock for
the
twenty-day
period ending January 13, 2010 of $15.68. The purchase
price allocation also assumes the closing price of
Denburys common stock on the closing date is $15.72, which
was determined using the closing price of Denbury common stock
on January 13, 2010. Assuming Denbury issues
124.0 million common shares to effect the Encore
acquisition, a $1.00 increase (decrease) in the closing price of
Denbury common stock on the closing date would increase
(decrease) goodwill by approximately $124.0 million. If
Denburys common stock trades at or below the low-end or at
or greater than the high end of the collar ($13.29 minimum and
$16.91 maximum) and the acquisition date fair value of
Denburys common stock is $15.72, the impact on the
unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet would be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twenty-Day
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume-Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in
|
Price of
|
|
Exchange
|
|
Aggregate Shares
|
|
Goodwill/Equity
|
Denbury Stock
|
|
Ratio
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
$13.29
|
|
2.6336
|
|
22,296
|
|
$ 350,489
|
$16.91
|
|
2.0698
|
|
(9,018)
|
|
$(141,766)
|
Additionally, the unaudited pro forma combined net income (loss)
per common share would be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury Common Stock $13.29
|
|
Denbury Common Stock $16.91
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Net income (loss) per common
share basic
|
|
$
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.86
|
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.02
|
|
Net income (loss) per common
share diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.82
|
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.97
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
392,432
|
|
|
|
390,211
|
|
|
|
361,118
|
|
|
|
358,897
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
392,432
|
|
|
|
398,806
|
|
|
|
361,118
|
|
|
|
367,492
|
|
Goodwill is measured as the excess of the fair value of the
consideration transferred plus the estimated fair value of the
noncontrolling interest of ENP over the acquisition-date
estimated fair value of the assets acquired less liabilities
assumed.
The fair value of the noncontrolling interest of ENP was
calculated using the ENP closing common unit price on
January 13, 2010 of $20.34. If ENPs common unit price
were to increase (decrease) by $1.00, goodwill would increase
(decrease) by $24.8 million.
F-11
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION Continued
Pro Forma
Adjustments to the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Balance
Sheet
(a) Represents pro forma adjustments to:
|
|
|
|
|
allocate the sum of the estimated fair value of consideration
transferred and the estimated fair value of the noncontrolling
interest of ENP to the estimated fair value of assets acquired
and liabilities assumed;
|
|
|
|
eliminate Encores historical goodwill and accumulated
depreciation, depletion and amortization balances;
|
|
|
|
eliminate deferred financing costs on a portion of Encores
credit facilities; and
|
|
|
|
record an increase in deferred tax liabilities primarily
resulting from fair value adjustments to Encores oil
and natural gas properties. Denbury will receive carryover tax
basis in Encores assets and liabilities because the merger
will not be a taxable transaction under the United States
Internal Revenue Code.
|
(b) Represents the new deferred financing costs
attributable to the Newly Committed Credit Facility and the
Bridge Facility.
(c) Represents the repayment of a portion of Encores
credit facilities ($180.0 million).
(d) Represents Denburys borrowings under the Newly
Committed Credit Facility and the Bridge Facility. Assumes
Denburys pro forma debt will consist of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
New
Financing(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Bridge Facility ($1.25 billion facility)
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
Newly Committed Credit Facility ($1.6 billion facility)
|
|
|
826,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total new financing
|
|
$
|
1,226,552
|
|
Denburys Existing Debt
|
|
|
|
|
9.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due
2016(2)
|
|
$
|
398,855
|
|
7.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due
2015(3)
|
|
|
300,535
|
|
7.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due
2013(4)
|
|
|
224,320
|
|
Pipeline financings
|
|
|
250,744
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
6,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denburys existing debt
|
|
$
|
1,180,759
|
|
Encores Existing Debt
|
|
|
|
|
7.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due
2017(5)
|
|
$
|
150,750
|
|
9.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due
2016(6)
|
|
|
237,938
|
|
6% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
6.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due
2014(7)
|
|
|
150,563
|
|
ENP revolving credit facility
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Encores existing debt
|
|
$
|
1,099,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total combined debt
|
|
$
|
3,506,562
|
|
Less current obligations
|
|
|
(4,698
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma combined long-term
debt(8)
|
|
$
|
3,501,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
If Denbury were to assume exercise of their contractual put
option by holders of all of Encores Old Notes at 101% of
par value and Denburys repurchase of all $600 million
of those notes, funded through additional borrowings on
Denburys Bridge Facility, long-term debt at
September 30, 2009 would increase by approximately
$17 million (see Note 1, Basis of
Presentation Effect of Modified Assumption on
Repurchase of Encore Senior Subordinated Notes). |
|
(2) |
|
Includes unamortized discount of $27.5 million. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes unamortized premium of $0.5 million. |
F-12
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION Continued
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Includes unamortized discount of $0.7 million. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes unamortized premium of $0.8 million. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes unamortized premium of $12.9 million. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes unamortized premium of $0.6 million. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes Long-term debt Genesis of
$250.7 million. |
(e) Represents the elimination of Encores historical
equity in connection with the acquisition method of accounting.
(f) Represents the increase in Denburys common stock
resulting from the issuance of Denbury shares to Encore
stockholders to effect the acquisition as follows (in thousands,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury common shares issued
|
|
|
123,980
|
|
Price of Denbury stock
|
|
$
|
15.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of common stock issued
|
|
|
1,948,966
|
|
Less stock-issuance costs
|
|
|
(1,750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net fair value of common stock issued
|
|
$
|
1,947,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g) Represents the estimated $28.1 million of
transaction costs incurred by Denbury and Encore not reflected
in the September 30, 2009 balance sheets, including
estimated banking fees ($25.4 million) and estimated legal
and accounting fees ($2.7 million) that are not
capitalizable as part of the transaction. These costs are
reflected in the unaudited pro forma balance sheet as a
reduction of equity as the costs will be expensed by Denbury at
the acquisition date.
|
|
Note 3
|
Unaudited
Pro forma Combined Statements of Operations
|
Adjustments (a) (h) to the Statement of
Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
the year ended December 31, 2008 include reclassifications
required to conform Encores revenue and expense items to
Denburys presentation as follows:
(a) Represents the reclassification of Encores oil
and natural gas product sales to conform to Denburys
presentation.
(b) Represents the reclassification of marketing revenue
and gains on sale of other assets to conform to Denburys
presentation.
(c) Represents the reclassification of the impairment
charge related to pipe inventory to Lease operating
expense to conform to Denburys presentation.
(d) Represents the reclassification of severance taxes to
Production taxes and marketing expense and the
transfer of ad valorem taxes to Lease operating
expense to conform to Denburys presentation.
(e) Represents the reclassification of transportation costs
to Production taxes and marketing expenses to
conform to Denburys presentation.
(f) Represents the reclassification of marketing expenses
to Production taxes and marketing expenses to
conform to Denburys presentation.
(g) Represents the reclassification of franchise taxes and
bad debt expense to General and administrative
expenses to conform to Denburys presentation.
(h) Represents the reclassification of accretion expense on
Encores asset retirement obligations to Depletion,
depreciation and amortization expense to conform to
Denburys presentation.
Adjustments (i) - (o) to the Statements of Operations for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and the year ended
December 31, 2008 include pro forma adjustments to reflect
the merger, related financing
F-13
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION Continued
transactions and the conversion of Encores method of
accounting for oil and natural gas properties from the
successful efforts method of accounting to the full cost method
of accounting.
(i) Represents the capitalization of unsuccessful
exploration costs, geological and geophysical costs and delay
rentals attributable to the development of oil and gas
properties in accordance with the full cost method of accounting
for oil and natural gas properties.
(j) Represents the change in depreciation, depletion and
amortization primarily resulting from the pro forma calculation
of the combined entitys depletion expense under the full
cost method of accounting for oil and natural gas properties.
The pro forma depletion adjustment utilizes a depletion rate of
$15.14 per BOE for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and $13.54 per BOE for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
(k) Represents the decrease to general and administrative
expense due to the reduction in ongoing executive salaries.
Encores named executive officers will not be retained as
employees of Denbury following the effective time of the merger.
(l) Represents the adjustment to historical interest
expense on debt to be retired and interest expense on the Newly
Committed Credit Facility and the Bridge Facility as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Decrease in interest due to paydown of Encores credit
facility
|
|
$
|
(6,628
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,646
|
)
|
Increase in interest due to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denburys Newly Committed Credit Facility
|
|
|
19,731
|
|
|
|
26,308
|
|
Denburys Bridge Facility
|
|
|
26,970
|
|
|
|
35,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma increase to cash interest expense
|
|
$
|
40,073
|
|
|
$
|
40,622
|
|
Decrease in amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
$
|
(2,652
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,118
|
)
|
Increase in amortization of deferred financing costs due to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denburys Newly Committed Credit Facility
|
|
|
9,680
|
|
|
|
13,786
|
|
Denburys Bridge Facility
|
|
|
3,638
|
|
|
|
4,850
|
|
Change in discount/premium on Encores senior subordinated
notes
|
|
|
(2,153
|
)
|
|
|
(791
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma increase to noncash interest expense
|
|
$
|
8,513
|
|
|
$
|
14,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma increase to interest expense
|
|
$
|
48,586
|
|
|
$
|
55,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma borrowings at September 30, 2009 under the Newly
Committed Credit Facility are $826.6 million. Interest on
the Newly Committed Credit Facility is variable at LIBOR plus
2%-3%. Pro forma interest expense under the Newly Committed
Credit Facility assumes an interest rate of 2.72% which was
calculated using LIBOR rates at January 13, 2010. Each 1/8%
fluctuation in the credit facility interest rate would change
pro forma interest expense by approximately
$0.8 million and $1.1 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and the year ended
December 31, 2008, respectively.
Pro forma borrowings at September 30, 2009 under the Bridge
Facility are $400.0 million. Interest on the Bridge
Facility will initially accrue interest at the Eurodollar rate
on the closing date of the acquisition plus 8.75%. Pro forma
interest expense under the Bridge Facility was calculated using
LIBOR rates at January 13, 2010 and assumes an interest
rate of 8.99%. Each 1/8% fluctuation in the Bridge Facility
interest rate would change pro forma interest expense by
approximately $0.4 million and $0.5 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and the year ended
December 31, 2008, respectively.
If Denbury were to assume exercise of their contractual put
option by holders of all of Encores Old Notes at 101% of
par value and Denburys repurchase of all $600 million
of those notes, funded through additional borrowings on
Denburys Bridge Facility, interest expense would increase
by approximately
F-14
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION Continued
$14 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and approximately $18 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 (see Note 1, Basis of
Presentation Effect of Modified Assumption on
Repurchase of Encore Senior Subordinated Notes).
(m) Represents the income tax effect of pro forma
adjustments (i) (l) at Denburys estimated
combined statutory tax rate of 37.5%. The effective tax rate of
the combined company could be significantly different (either
higher or lower) depending on post-merger activities.
(n) Represents the allocable portion of adjustments (i) and
(j) to earnings relating to the noncontrolling interest of ENP.
(o) Represents additional shares of Denbury common stock
estimated to be issued to Encore stockholders at the acquisition
date.
|
|
Note 4
|
Denburys
Unaudited Pro forma Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and
Statements of Operations
|
Denburys unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
balance sheet and statements of operations included in the
unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet and statements of
operations give effect to the following transactions:
May 2009 Sale of 60% of Denburys Barnett Shale Natural
Gas Assets. In May 2009, Denbury entered into an agreement
to sell 60% of its Barnett Shale natural gas assets to Talon Oil
and Gas LLC (Talon), a privately held company, for
$270 million (before closing adjustments). The effective
date under the agreement was June 1, 2009, and consequently
operating net revenues after June 1, net of capital
expenditures, along with any other purchase price adjustments,
were adjustments to the selling price. In June 2009, Denbury
completed approximately three-quarters of the sale and closed
the remaining portion of the sale in July 2009. Combined net
proceeds were $259.8 million (after closing adjustments and
net of $8.1 million for natural gas swaps transferred in
the sale). Denbury used the net proceeds from the sale to repay
bank debt. Denbury did not record a gain or loss on the sale in
accordance with the full cost method of accounting.
December 2009 Sale of Remaining 40% of Denburys
Barnett Shale Natural Gas Assets. In December 2009,
Denbury closed the sale of its remaining 40% interest in Barnett
Shale natural gas assets to Talon for $210 million (before
closing adjustments). The effective date under the agreement was
December 1, 2009. The proceeds of this sale were used to
reduce outstanding bank debt. Denbury does not expect to record
a gain or loss on the sale in accordance with the full cost
method of accounting. Further, the sale was structured as a
deferred like-kind exchange in conjunction with Denburys
December 2009 purchase of Conroe Field in order to defer
most of the tax impacts of the sale.
Denburys unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
balance sheet gives effect to the sale of 40% of its Barnett
Shale natural gas assets as if it occurred on September 30,
2009. The effect of the May 2009 sale of 60% of Denburys
Barnett Shale natural gas assets is included in Denburys
historical condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
September 30, 2009 as the sale occurred prior to
September 30, 2009.
Denburys unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
statements of operations include the effect of the sale of 60%,
and subsequent sale of 40%, of its Barnett Shale natural gas
assets as if each occurred on January 1, 2008.
F-15
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION Continued
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
21,689
|
|
|
$
|
190,000
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
211,689
|
|
Trade, accrued production and other receivables, net
|
|
|
168,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,931
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
17,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,900
|
|
Current deferred tax assets
|
|
|
5,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,157
|
|
|
|
190,000
|
|
|
|
404,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
3,468,060
|
|
|
|
(210,000
|
)(a)
|
|
|
3,258,060
|
|
Unevaluated
|
|
|
213,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213,170
|
|
CO2
properties, equipment and pipelines
|
|
|
1,422,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,422,981
|
|
Other
|
|
|
80,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,015
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(1,763,902
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,763,902
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment
|
|
|
3,420,324
|
|
|
|
(210,000
|
)
|
|
|
3,210,324
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
138,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,830
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
52,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,343
|
|
Investment in Genesis
|
|
|
77,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,903,260
|
|
|
$
|
(20,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,883,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
188,420
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
188,420
|
|
Oil and gas production payable
|
|
|
86,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,038
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
|
74,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,614
|
|
Deferred revenue Genesis
|
|
|
4,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,070
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
4,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
357,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt Genesis
|
|
|
250,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,681
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
945,380
|
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)(a)
|
|
|
925,380
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
47,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,149
|
|
Deferred revenue Genesis
|
|
|
16,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,796
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
458,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458,940
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
|
12,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,496
|
|
Other
|
|
|
23,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
1,754,761
|
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
|
|
1,734,761
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
1,790,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,790,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
3,903,260
|
|
|
$
|
(20,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,883,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION Continued
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues and other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil, natural gas and related product sales
|
|
$
|
600,942
|
|
|
$
|
(62,830
|
)(b)
|
|
$
|
538,112
|
|
CO2
sales and transportation fees
|
|
|
9,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,708
|
|
Interest income and other
|
|
|
1,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
612,598
|
|
|
|
(62,830
|
)
|
|
|
549,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
|
241,908
|
|
|
|
(13,767
|
)(c)
|
|
|
228,141
|
|
Production taxes and marketing expenses
|
|
|
24,294
|
|
|
|
(4,348
|
)(c)
|
|
|
19,946
|
|
Transportation expense Genesis
|
|
|
6,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,143
|
|
CO2
operating expenses
|
|
|
3,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,442
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
79,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,828
|
|
Interest, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
36,960
|
|
|
|
(2,865
|
)(d)
|
|
|
34,095
|
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
177,145
|
|
|
|
(13,870
|
)(c)
|
|
|
163,275
|
|
Commodity derivative expense
|
|
|
177,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
746,781
|
|
|
|
(34,850
|
)
|
|
|
711,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net income of Genesis
|
|
|
5,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(128,381
|
)
|
|
|
(27,980
|
)
|
|
|
(156,361
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(49,729
|
)
|
|
|
(10,633
|
)(e)
|
|
|
(60,362
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(78,652
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,347
|
)
|
|
$
|
(95,999
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share basic
|
|
$
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
Net loss per common share diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
246,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246,156
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
246,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246,156
|
|
F-17
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION Continued
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
|
Denbury
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues and other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil, natural gas and related product sales
|
|
$
|
1,347,010
|
|
|
$
|
(234,861
|
)(b)
|
|
$
|
1,112,149
|
|
CO2
sales and transportation fees
|
|
|
13,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,858
|
|
Interest income and other
|
|
|
4,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
1,365,702
|
|
|
|
(234,861
|
)
|
|
|
1,130,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense
|
|
|
307,550
|
|
|
|
(24,041
|
)(c)
|
|
|
283,509
|
|
Production taxes and marketing expenses
|
|
|
55,770
|
|
|
|
(12,626
|
)(c)
|
|
|
43,144
|
|
Transportation expense Genesis
|
|
|
7,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,982
|
|
CO2
operating expenses
|
|
|
4,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,216
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
60,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,374
|
|
Interest, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
32,596
|
|
|
|
(3,593
|
)(d)
|
|
|
29,003
|
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
221,792
|
|
|
|
(44,252
|
)(c)
|
|
|
177,540
|
|
Commodity derivative income
|
|
|
(200,053
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200,053
|
)
|
Abandoned acquisition cost
|
|
|
30,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,601
|
|
Write-down of oil and natural gas properties
|
|
|
226,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
746,828
|
|
|
|
(84,512
|
)
|
|
|
662,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net income of Genesis
|
|
|
5,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
624,228
|
|
|
|
(150,349
|
)
|
|
|
473,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
235,832
|
|
|
|
(57,133
|
)(e)
|
|
|
178,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
388,396
|
|
|
$
|
(93,216
|
)
|
|
$
|
295,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic
|
|
$
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
Net income per common share diluted
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
243,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,935
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
252,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,530
|
|
Denburys unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
balance sheet and statements of operations include the following
adjustments:
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents the increase in cash of $190 million, reduction
in debt of $20 million and reduction in oil and natural gas
properties of $210 million resulting from the sale of the
remaining 40% of Denburys Barnett Shale natural gas assets
in December 2009. Denburys bank debt outstanding as of
September 30, 2009 was $20 million. As such, the pro
forma adjustment reflects the paydown of this $20 million
of bank debt. However, in the fourth quarter of 2009 Denbury
incurred additional bank debt and utilized the entire
$210 million of Barnett Shale proceeds to pay down bank
debt. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents the decrease in revenues from the sale of oil and
natural gas resulting from the disposal of Denburys
Barnett Shale natural gas assets. |
|
(c) |
|
Represents the reduction in lease operating expense, production
expenses and depletion attributable to the disposal of
Denburys Barnett Shale natural gas assets. Denburys
estimated pro forma oil and natural gas depletion rate was
$13.16 per BOE for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and $12.03 per BOE for the year ended
December 31, 2008. Denburys historical oil and
natural gas depletion rate was $11.44 per BOE for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and $11.55 per BOE for
the year ended December 31, 2008. |
|
(d) |
|
Denbury utilized the proceeds from the sale of its 60% interest
in its Barnett Shale natural gas assets in
mid-2009 to
repay a portion of its credit facility. Denbury used the
proceeds from the sale of the remaining 40% of its interest in
its Barnett Shale natural gas assets in December 2009 to reduce
outstanding bank debt. The adjustment to interest expense
reflects the reduction in interest expense as if the repayments
occurred on January 1, 2008. |
|
(e) |
|
Represents the income tax effect of the pro forma adjustments at
Denburys approximate statutory tax rate of 38%. |
F-18
ANNEX A
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
by and between
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
and
DENBURY RESOURCES INC.
Executed on October 31, 2009
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
ARTICLE I THE MERGER
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Section 1.1
|
|
The Merger
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Section 1.2
|
|
Effective Time; Closing
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Section 1.3
|
|
Governing Documents
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 1.4
|
|
Directors and Officers
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE II
CONVERSION OF REDFISH COMMON STOCK
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 2.1
|
|
Equity Interests of Redfish and Dorado
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
Section 2.2
|
|
Exchange of Shares
|
|
|
A-5
|
|
Section 2.3
|
|
Certain Adjustments
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
Section 2.4
|
|
Appraisal Rights
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
Section 2.5
|
|
Associated Rights
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF REDFISH
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Section 3.1
|
|
Organization and Qualification; Subsidiaries
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Section 3.2
|
|
Organizational Documents
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
Section 3.3
|
|
Capitalization
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
Section 3.4
|
|
Authority; Due Authorization; Binding Agreement; Approval
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Section 3.5
|
|
No Violation; Consents
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Section 3.6
|
|
Compliance
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
Section 3.7
|
|
SEC Filings; Financial Statements; Sarbanes-Oxley; Internal
Accounting Controls; Disclosure Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
Section 3.8
|
|
Absence of Undisclosed Liabilities
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
Section 3.9
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes or Events
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
Section 3.10
|
|
Litigation
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
Section 3.11
|
|
Employee Benefit Plans
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
Section 3.12
|
|
Information Supplied
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
Section 3.13
|
|
Properties, Oil and Gas Matters
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
Section 3.14
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
Section 3.15
|
|
Environmental Matters
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
Section 3.16
|
|
Redfish Intellectual Property
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
Section 3.17
|
|
Derivative Transactions and Hedging
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
Section 3.18
|
|
FERC Jurisdiction
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
Section 3.19
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
Section 3.20
|
|
Labor Matters
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
Section 3.21
|
|
Transactions with Certain Persons
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
Section 3.22
|
|
Material Contracts
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
Section 3.23
|
|
Opinion of Financial Advisor
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
Section 3.24
|
|
Brokers
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
Section 3.25
|
|
State Takeover Laws
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
Section 3.26
|
|
Rights Agreement
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
Section 3.27
|
|
Required Redfish Stockholder Vote
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF DORADO
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
Section 4.1
|
|
Corporate Organization
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
A-i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Section 4.2
|
|
Organizational Documents
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
Section 4.3
|
|
Capitalization
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
Section 4.4
|
|
Authority; Due Authorization; Binding Agreement; Approval
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Section 4.5
|
|
No Violation; Consents
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
Section 4.6
|
|
Compliance
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
Section 4.7
|
|
SEC Filings; Financial Statements; Sarbanes-Oxley; Internal
Accounting Controls; Disclosure Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
Section 4.8
|
|
Absence of Undisclosed Liabilities
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
Section 4.9
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes or Events
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
Section 4.10
|
|
Litigation
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
Section 4.11
|
|
Employee Benefit Plans
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
Section 4.12
|
|
Information Supplied
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Section 4.13
|
|
Properties, Oil and Gas Matters
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Section 4.14
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
Section 4.15
|
|
Environmental Matters
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
Section 4.16
|
|
Dorado Intellectual Property
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
Section 4.17
|
|
Derivative Transactions and Hedging
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
Section 4.18
|
|
FERC Jurisdiction
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
Section 4.19
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
Section 4.20
|
|
Labor Matters
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
Section 4.21
|
|
Transactions with Certain Persons
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
Section 4.22
|
|
Material Contracts
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
Section 4.23
|
|
Opinion of Financial Advisor
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
Section 4.24
|
|
Brokers
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
Section 4.25
|
|
Required Dorado Stockholder Vote
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
Section 4.26
|
|
Ownership of Shares of Redfish Common Stock
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
Section 4.27
|
|
Financing
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE V CONDUCT OF
BUSINESS
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
Section 5.1
|
|
Redfish Conduct of Business
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
Section 5.2
|
|
Dorado Conduct of Business
|
|
|
A-39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VI
ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
Section 6.1
|
|
Proxy Statement; Stockholders Meeting
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
Section 6.2
|
|
Access to Information; Confidentiality
|
|
|
A-42
|
|
Section 6.3
|
|
No Solicitation
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
Section 6.4
|
|
Directors and Officers Indemnification and Insurance
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
Section 6.5
|
|
Notification of Certain Matters
|
|
|
A-47
|
|
Section 6.6
|
|
Further Action; Best Efforts
|
|
|
A-47
|
|
Section 6.7
|
|
Public Announcements
|
|
|
A-48
|
|
Section 6.8
|
|
Employee Matters
|
|
|
A-48
|
|
Section 6.9
|
|
Section 16 Matters
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
Section 6.10
|
|
Redfish Indebtedness
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
Section 6.11
|
|
Financing
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
Section 6.12
|
|
Authorization for Shares and Stock Exchange Listing
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
A-ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Section 6.13
|
|
Rights Agreement
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
Section 6.14
|
|
State Takeover Laws
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
Section 6.15
|
|
Stockholder Litigation
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
Section 6.16
|
|
Reorganization
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
Section 6.17
|
|
Comfort Letters
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
Section 6.18
|
|
Financing Cooperation
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VII
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Section 7.1
|
|
Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party to Effect the Merger
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
Section 7.2
|
|
Additional Conditions to the Obligation of Redfish
|
|
|
A-55
|
|
Section 7.3
|
|
Additional Conditions to the Obligations of Dorado
|
|
|
A-56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VIII
TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER
|
|
|
A-56
|
|
Section 8.1
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
A-56
|
|
Section 8.2
|
|
Effect of Termination
|
|
|
A-57
|
|
Section 8.3
|
|
Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
A-58
|
|
Section 8.4
|
|
Amendment
|
|
|
A-60
|
|
Section 8.5
|
|
Waiver
|
|
|
A-60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE IX GENERAL
PROVISIONS
|
|
|
A-60
|
|
Section 9.1
|
|
Survival
|
|
|
A-60
|
|
Section 9.2
|
|
Scope of Representations and Warranties
|
|
|
A-60
|
|
Section 9.3
|
|
Notices
|
|
|
A-61
|
|
Section 9.4
|
|
Certain Definitions
|
|
|
A-62
|
|
Section 9.5
|
|
Severability
|
|
|
A-65
|
|
Section 9.6
|
|
Entire Agreement; Assignment
|
|
|
A-65
|
|
Section 9.7
|
|
Parties in Interest
|
|
|
A-65
|
|
Section 9.8
|
|
Specific Performance
|
|
|
A-65
|
|
Section 9.9
|
|
Governing Law; Jurisdiction and Venue
|
|
|
A-65
|
|
Section 9.10
|
|
Waiver of Jury Trial
|
|
|
A-66
|
|
Section 9.11
|
|
Headings
|
|
|
A-66
|
|
Section 9.12
|
|
Interpretation
|
|
|
A-66
|
|
Section 9.13
|
|
Counterparts
|
|
|
A-66
|
|
A-iii
SCHEDULE OF
DEFINED TERMS
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Term
|
|
Location
|
|
2000 Stock Plan
|
|
|
Section 2.1(f)(i)
|
|
2008 Stock Plan
|
|
|
Section 2.1(f)(i)
|
|
Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement
|
|
|
Section 6.3(d)
|
|
Acquisition Agreement
|
|
|
Section 6.3(a)
|
|
Acquisition Proposal
|
|
|
Section 6.3(d)
|
|
Action
|
|
|
Section 3.11(i)
|
|
affiliate
|
|
|
Section 9.4(a)
|
|
Affiliate Transaction
|
|
|
Section 3.21
|
|
Agreement
|
|
|
Preamble
|
|
Alternate Financing
|
|
|
Section 6.11(c)
|
|
Available Cash Election Amount
|
|
|
Section 2.1(a)(ii)
|
|
beneficial owner
|
|
|
Section 9.4(b)
|
|
Bonus Plan Participant
|
|
|
Section 6.8(c)
|
|
Book Entry Shares
|
|
|
Section 2.1(b)(i)
|
|
business day
|
|
|
Section 9.4(c)
|
|
Cash Election Amount
|
|
|
Section 2.1(a)(ii)
|
|
Cash Election Share
|
|
|
Section 2.1(a)(ii)
|
|
Cash Fraction
|
|
|
Section 2.1(a)(ii)
|
|
Certificates
|
|
|
Section 2.1(c)
|
|
Certificate of Merger
|
|
|
Section 1.2
|
|
Change of Law
|
|
|
Section 9.4(d)
|
|
Closing
|
|
|
Section 1.2
|
|
Closing Date
|
|
|
Section 1.2
|
|
Code
|
|
|
Section 2.2(j)
|
|
Commitment Letter
|
|
|
Section 4.27
|
|
Confidentiality Agreement
|
|
|
Section 6.2(c)
|
|
control
|
|
|
Section 9.4(e)
|
|
controlled by
|
|
|
Section 9.4(e)
|
|
Controlled Group Liability
|
|
|
Section 3.11(a)(i)
|
|
Converted Restricted Shares
|
|
|
Section 6.8(c)(ii)(B)
|
|
Determination Date
|
|
|
Section 8.3(c)(i)
|
|
Derivative Transactions
|
|
|
Section 3.17
|
|
DGCL
|
|
|
Section 1.1
|
|
Dissenting Shares
|
|
|
Section 2.4
|
|
Dissenting Stockholder
|
|
|
Section 2.4
|
|
Dorado
|
|
|
Preamble
|
|
Dorado Adverse Recommendation Change
|
|
|
Section 6.1(f)
|
|
Dorado Board of Directors
|
|
|
Section 4.4(d)
|
|
Dorado Common Stock
|
|
|
Section 2.1(a)(i)
|
|
Dorado Employees
|
|
|
Section 4.20
|
|
Dorado Financial Advisor
|
|
|
Section 4.23
|
|
Dorado Intellectual Property
|
|
|
Section 4.16(a)
|
|
Dorado Material Contracts
|
|
|
Section 4.22
|
|
A-iv
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Term
|
|
Location
|
|
Dorado Material Adverse Effect
|
|
|
Section 9.4(h)
|
|
Dorado Material Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Section 4.1
|
|
Dorado Notice
|
|
|
Section 6.1(f)
|
|
Dorado Oil and Gas Agreements
|
|
|
Section 4.13(a)
|
|
Dorado Plans
|
|
|
Section 3.11(a)(iv)
|
|
Dorado Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Section 4.3(a)
|
|
Dorado Recommendation
|
|
|
Section 6.1(f)
|
|
Dorado Reserve Reports
|
|
|
Section 4.13(b)
|
|
Dorado SEC Reports Section
|
|
|
Section 4.7(a)
|
|
Dorado Share Value
|
|
|
Section 2.1(a)(i)
|
|
Dorado Stockholder Approval
|
|
|
Section 4.25
|
|
Dorado Stockholders
|
|
|
Section 4.4(d)
|
|
Dorado Stockholders Meeting
|
|
|
Section 6.1(f)
|
|
Dorado Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Section 4.1
|
|
Dorado Subsidiary
|
|
|
Section 4.1
|
|
Effective Time
|
|
|
Section 1.2
|
|
Electing Stockholder
|
|
|
Section 2.2(b)
|
|
Election Deadline
|
|
|
Section 2.1(b)(ii)
|
|
Election Form
|
|
|
Section 2.1(b)(i)
|
|
Election Form Record Date
|
|
|
Section 2.1(b)(i)
|
|
Employee Severance Protection Plan
|
|
|
Section 5.1(f)
|
|
Environmental Laws
|
|
|
Section 3.15(a)
|
|
ERISA
|
|
|
Section 3.11(a)(ii)
|
|
ERISA Affiliate
|
|
|
Section 3.11(a)(iii)
|
|
Exchange Act
|
|
|
Section 3.5(b)
|
|
Exchange Agent
|
|
|
Section 2.2(a)
|
|
Exchange Fund
|
|
|
Section 2.2(a)
|
|
Exchange Ratio
|
|
|
Section 2.1(a)(iii)
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Section 8.3(f)
|
|
FERC
|
|
|
Section 3.18
|
|
Financing
|
|
|
Section 6.11(a)
|
|
Financing Sources
|
|
|
Section 4.27
|
|
Financing Termination Fee
|
|
|
Section 8.3(c)(i)
|
|
Funds
|
|
|
Section 4.27
|
|
GAAP
|
|
|
Section 3.7(b)
|
|
good and defensible title
|
|
|
Section 3.13(a)
|
|
Governmental Authority
|
|
|
Section 9.4(f)
|
|
GP Interest
|
|
|
Section 3.3(b)
|
|
HSR Act
|
|
|
Section 3.5(b)
|
|
Hydrocarbons
|
|
|
Section 3.13(a)
|
|
Indemnified Parties Section
|
|
|
Section 6.4(b)
|
|
Indemnified Party
|
|
|
Section 6.4(b)
|
|
Intervening Event
|
|
|
Section 6.1(f)
|
|
IRS
|
|
|
Section 3.11(b)
|
|
A-v
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Term
|
|
Location
|
|
Joint Proxy Statement
|
|
|
Section 3.12
|
|
Letter of Transmittal
|
|
|
Section 2.2(b)
|
|
Mailing Date
|
|
|
Section 2.1(b)(i)
|
|
Merger
|
|
|
Recitals
|
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
|
Section 2.1(a)
|
|
Mixed Consideration Election Share
|
|
|
Section 2.1(a)(i)
|
|
Mixed Election Stock Exchange Ratio
|
|
|
Section 2.1(a)(i)
|
|
MLP
|
|
|
Section 3.3(b)
|
|
MLP General Partner
|
|
|
Section 3.3(b)
|
|
MLP SEC Reports
|
|
|
Section 3.7(a)
|
|
Multiple Employer Plan
|
|
|
Section 3.11(c)
|
|
National Securities Exchange
|
|
|
Section 9.4(g)
|
|
New Commitment Letter
|
|
|
Section 6.11(c)
|
|
NGA
|
|
|
Section 3.18
|
|
Non-Election Shares
|
|
|
Section 2.1(b)(ii)
|
|
NYSE
|
|
|
Section 2.1(a)(i)
|
|
Oil and Gas Properties
|
|
|
Section 3.13(a)
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Section 2.1(f)(i)
|
|
Outside Date
|
|
|
Section 8.1(b)(i)
|
|
Partnership Agreement
|
|
|
Section 3.3(b)
|
|
Per Share Cash Election Consideration
|
|
|
Section 2.1(a)(ii)
|
|
Per Share Mixed Consideration
|
|
|
Section 2.1(a)(i)
|
|
Per Share Mixed Election Cash Amount
|
|
|
Section 2.1(a)(i)
|
|
Per Share Stock Election Consideration
|
|
|
Section 2.1(a)(iii)
|
|
Permitted Encumbrances
|
|
|
Section 9.4(i)
|
|
person
|
|
|
Section 9.4(j)
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Section 3.11(a)(iv)
|
|
Redfish
|
|
|
Preamble
|
|
Redfish 2009 Bonus Restricted Shares
|
|
|
Section 6.8(c)(ii)
|
|
Redfish 401(k) Plan
|
|
|
Section 3.11(b)
|
|
Redfish Adverse Recommendation Change
|
|
|
Section 6.3(b)
|
|
Redfish Board of Directors
|
|
|
Section 3.4(d)
|
|
Redfish Common Stock
|
|
|
Recitals
|
|
Redfish Employees
|
|
|
Section 3.20
|
|
Redfish Excluded Shares
|
|
|
Section 2.1(c)
|
|
Redfish Financial Advisor
|
|
|
Section 3.23
|
|
Redfish Intellectual Property
|
|
|
Section 3.16(a)
|
|
Redfish Material Adverse Effect
|
|
|
Section 9.4(k)
|
|
Redfish Material Contracts
|
|
|
Section 3.22(a)
|
|
Redfish Material Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Section 3.1
|
|
Redfish Notice
|
|
|
Section 6.3(b)
|
|
Redfish Oil and Gas Agreements
|
|
|
Section 3.13(a)
|
|
Redfish Plans
|
|
|
Section 3.11(a)(iv)
|
|
Redfish Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Section 3.3(a)
|
|
A-vi
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Term
|
|
Location
|
|
Redfish Recommendation
|
|
|
Section 6.1(e)
|
|
Redfish Reserve Reports
|
|
|
Section 3.13(b)
|
|
Redfish Restricted Shares
|
|
|
Section 2.1(f)(ii)
|
|
Redfish Rights
|
|
|
Section 2.5
|
|
Redfish SEC Reports
|
|
|
Section 3.7(a)
|
|
Redfish Stockholder Approval
|
|
|
Section 3.27
|
|
Redfish Stockholders
|
|
|
Section 3.4(d)
|
|
Redfish Stockholders Meeting
|
|
|
Section 6.1(e)
|
|
Redfish Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Section 3.1
|
|
Redfish Subsidiary
|
|
|
Section 3.1
|
|
Redfish Subsidiary Shares
|
|
|
Section 2.1(c)
|
|
Registration Statement
|
|
|
Section 3.12
|
|
Requirement of Law
|
|
|
Section 9.4(l)
|
|
Returns
|
|
|
Section 3.14(a)
|
|
Rights Agreement
|
|
|
Section 2.5
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
|
Section 3.7(c)
|
|
SEC
|
|
|
Section 3.7(a)
|
|
Securities Act
|
|
|
Section 3.5(b)
|
|
Stock Election Share
|
|
|
Section 2.1(a)(iii)
|
|
subsidiaries
|
|
|
Section 9.4(m)
|
|
subsidiary
|
|
|
Section 9.4(m)
|
|
Superior Proposal
|
|
|
Section 6.3(d)
|
|
Surviving Entity
|
|
|
Section 1.1
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
Section 3.14(p)
|
|
under common control with
|
|
|
Section 9.4(e)
|
|
WARN Act
|
|
|
Section 3.20
|
|
A-vii
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
THIS AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, executed this 31st day
of October, 2009 (this Agreement), is by and
between Encore Acquisition Company, a Delaware corporation
(Redfish), and Denbury Resources Inc., a
Delaware corporation (Dorado).
RECITALS
A. The respective boards of directors of Dorado and Redfish
have each approved this Agreement and deem it advisable and in
the best interests of their respective companies and equity
holders to consummate the merger of Redfish with and into
Dorado, with Dorado as the surviving entity (the
Merger) upon the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth herein.
B. Pursuant to the Merger, each issued and outstanding
share of common stock, par value $.01 per share, of Redfish
(Redfish Common Stock), other than
(i) the shares of Redfish Common Stock owned by Dorado or
Redfish (or any of their respective direct or indirect wholly
owned subsidiaries), (ii) Redfish 2009 Bonus Restricted
Shares and (iii) the Dissenting Shares, will be converted
into the right to receive the Merger Consideration, all as more
fully described and provided for in this Agreement.
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the
benefits to be derived by each party hereunder and other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, Redfish and Dorado agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
The Merger
Section 1.1 The
Merger. Upon the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth in this Agreement, including
Article VII hereof, and in accordance with the Delaware
General Corporation Law (the DGCL), at the
Effective Time, Redfish shall be merged with and into Dorado. As
a result of the Merger, the separate corporate existence of
Redfish shall cease, and Dorado shall continue as the surviving
entity of the Merger (the Surviving Entity).
The Merger shall have the effects specified herein and in the
DGCL.
Section 1.2 Effective
Time; Closing. As promptly as practicable (but no
later than one business day) after the satisfaction or, if
permissible, waiver in accordance with Section 8.5 of the
last to be satisfied or waived of the conditions set forth in
Article VII (other than conditions that by their nature can
be satisfied only at the Closing but subject to the satisfaction
or waiver of those conditions), the parties hereto shall cause
the Merger to be consummated by filing a certificate of merger
(the Certificate of Merger) with the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in such form as is
required by, and executed in accordance with the relevant
provisions of, the DGCL (the date and time of such filing, or at
such later time as shall be agreed upon by Dorado and Redfish
and specified in the Certificate of Merger, being the
Effective Time). Prior to but on the same day
as such filing, a closing (the Closing) shall
be held at the offices of Baker Botts L.L.P. at 910 Louisiana
Street, Houston, Texas
77002-4995,
or such other place as the parties shall agree, for the purpose
of confirming the satisfaction or waiver, as the case may be, of
the conditions set forth in Article VII. The date of the
Closing is referred to herein as the Closing
Date.
A-1
Section 1.3 Governing
Documents.
(a) Certificate of
Incorporation. At the Effective Time, the
certificate of incorporation of Dorado in effect immediately
prior to the Effective Time shall be the certificate of
incorporation of the Surviving Entity, until thereafter amended
as provided therein and in accordance with applicable law.
(b) Bylaws. At the Effective Time,
the bylaws of Dorado in effect immediately prior to the
Effective Time shall be the bylaws of the Surviving Entity,
until thereafter amended as provided therein and in accordance
with applicable law and the terms of such bylaws.
Section 1.4 Directors
and Officers.
(a) Directors. The directors of
Dorado immediately prior to the Effective Time shall continue to
be the directors of the Surviving Entity, each to hold office in
accordance with the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of
the Surviving Entity.
(b) Officers. The officers of
Dorado immediately prior to the Effective Time shall continue to
be the officers of the Surviving Entity, in each case until
their respective successors are duly elected or appointed and
qualified.
ARTICLE II
Conversion
of Redfish Common Stock
Section 2.1 Equity
Interests of Redfish and Dorado.
(a) Merger Consideration. At the
Effective Time, subject to the other provisions of this
Agreement, each share of Redfish Common Stock issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (including
any Redfish Restricted Shares but excluding Redfish 2009 Bonus
Restricted Shares, Redfish Excluded Shares and Redfish
Subsidiary Shares) shall, by virtue of the Merger and without
any action on the part of the holder thereof, be converted into
and shall thereafter represent the right to receive the
following consideration (collectively, the Merger
Consideration), subject to adjustment in accordance
with Section 2.3:
(i) Each share of Redfish Common Stock (including Redfish
Restricted Shares but excluding Redfish 2009 Bonus Restricted
Shares) with respect to which an election to receive a
combination of stock and cash has been effectively made and not
revoked or lost pursuant to Section 2.1(b) (each, a
Mixed Consideration Election Share) and each
Non-Election Share shall be converted into the right to receive
the combination (such combination, the Per Share Mixed
Consideration) of (x) $15.00 in cash (the
Per Share Mixed Election Cash Amount) and
(y) a number of validly issued, fully paid and
non-assessable shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share
(Dorado Common Stock) equal to the quotient
(the Mixed Election Stock Exchange Ratio)
determined by dividing $35.00 by the volume weighted average
price of Dorado Common Stock for the period of twenty
(20) consecutive trading days ending on the second full
trading day prior to the Effective Time (the Dorado
Share Value) and rounding to the nearest
ten-thousandth of a share, for sales conducted regular way on
the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), as such
volume weighted average price is calculated on the VAP screen on
the Bloomberg Professional
tm
Service and shown as VWAP for such period or, if not calculated
thereby, another authoritative source; provided, that
(x) if the Dorado Share Value is equal to or greater than
$16.91, the Mixed Election Stock Exchange Ratio shall equal
2.0698, and (y) if the Dorado Share Value is equal to or
less than $13.29, the Mixed Election Stock Exchange Ratio shall
equal 2.6336.
(ii) If the Available Cash Election Amount equals or
exceeds the Cash Election Amount, then each share of Redfish
Common Stock (including Redfish Restricted Shares but excluding
Redfish 2009 Bonus Restricted Shares) with respect to which an
election to receive cash has been effectively made and not
A-2
revoked or lost pursuant to Section 2.1(b) (each, a
Cash Election Share) shall be converted into
the right to receive $50.00 in cash without interest (the
Per Share Cash Election Consideration). If
(A) the product of the number of Cash Election Shares and
the Per Share Cash Election Consideration (such product being
the Cash Election Amount) exceeds
(B) the product of (x) the Per Share Mixed Election
Cash Amount and (y) the difference between (1) the
total number of shares of Redfish Common Stock (including
Redfish Restricted Shares but excluding Redfish 2009 Bonus
Restricted Shares, Redfish Excluded Shares and Redfish
Subsidiary Shares) issued and outstanding immediately prior to
the Effective Time minus (2) the number of Mixed
Consideration Election Shares (provided that Non-Election Shares
shall be deemed to be Mixed Consideration Election Shares for
purposes of this Section 2.1(a)(ii)) (such product being the
Available Cash Election Amount), then each
Cash Election Share shall be converted into a right to receive
(1) an amount of cash (without interest) equal to the
product of (p) the Per Share Cash Election Consideration
and (q) a fraction, the numerator of which shall be the
Available Cash Election Amount and the denominator of which
shall be the Cash Election Amount (such fraction being the
Cash Fraction) and (2) a number of
validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable shares of Dorado
Common Stock equal to the product of (r) the Exchange Ratio
and (s) one minus the Cash Fraction.
(iii) If the Cash Election Amount equals or exceeds the
Available Cash Election Amount, then each share of Redfish
Common Stock (including Redfish Restricted Shares but excluding
Redfish 2009 Bonus Restricted Shares) with respect to which an
election to receive stock consideration is properly made and not
revoked or lost pursuant to Section 2.1(b) (each, a
Stock Election Share) shall be converted into
the right to receive a number of validly issued, fully paid and
non-assessable shares of Dorado Common Stock (subject to
adjustment in accordance with Section 2.3 and together with
any cash in lieu of fractional shares of Dorado Common Stock to
be paid pursuant to Section 2.2(e) (the Per Share
Stock Election Consideration)), equal to the quotient
(the Exchange Ratio) determined by dividing
$50.00 by the Dorado Share Value and rounding to the nearest
ten-thousandth of a share; provided, that (x) if the
Dorado Share Value is equal to or greater than $16.91, the
Exchange Ratio shall equal 2.9568, and (y) if the Dorado
Share Value is equal to or less than $13.29, the Exchange Ratio
shall equal 3.7622. If the Available Cash Election Amount
exceeds the Cash Election Amount, then each Stock Election Share
shall be converted into the right to receive (1) an amount
of cash (without interest) equal to the amount of such excess
divided by the number of Stock Election Shares and (2) a
number of validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable shares
of Dorado Common Stock equal to the product of (x) the
Exchange Ratio and (y) a fraction, the numerator of which
shall be the Per Share Cash Election Consideration minus the
amount calculated in clause (1) of this paragraph and the
denominator of which shall be the Per Share Cash Election
Consideration.
(b) Election Procedures.
(i) Not less than thirty (30) days prior to the
anticipated Effective Time, an election form and other
appropriate and customary transmittal materials (which shall
specify that delivery shall be effected, and risk of loss and
title to the Certificates theretofore representing shares of
Redfish Common Stock or non-certificated shares represented by
book entry (Book Entry Shares) shall pass,
only upon proper delivery of such Certificates or Book Entry
Shares, respectively, to the Exchange Agent) in such form as
Dorado shall specify and as shall be reasonably acceptable to
Redfish (the Election Form) shall be mailed
at such time as Redfish and Dorado may agree (the
Mailing Date) to each holder of record of
shares of Redfish Common Stock as of five (5) business days
prior to the Mailing Date (the Election
Form Record Date).
(ii) Each Election Form shall permit the holder (or the
beneficial owner through appropriate and customary documentation
and instructions), other than any holder of Redfish Excluded
Shares or Redfish Subsidiary Shares, to specify (i) the
number of shares of such holders Redfish Common Stock with
respect to which such holder elects to receive the Per Share
Mixed Consideration, (ii) the number of shares of such
holders Redfish Common Stock with respect to which such
holder elects to receive the Per Share Stock Election
Consideration, (iii) the number of shares of such
holders Redfish Common Stock with respect to which such
holder elects to receive the Per Share Cash Election
Consideration, or (iv) that such holder makes no election
with respect to such holders Redfish Common Stock
(Non-
A-3
Election Shares). Any Redfish Common Stock with
respect to which the Exchange Agent has not received an
effective, properly completed Election Form on or before
5:00 p.m., New York time, on the twentieth (20th) day
following the Mailing Date (or such other time and date as
Redfish and Dorado shall agree) (the Election
Deadline) (other than any shares of Redfish Common
Stock that constitute Dissenting Shares as of such time) shall
also be deemed to be Non-Election Shares.
(iii) Dorado shall make available one or more Election
Forms as may reasonably be requested from time to time by any
persons who become holders (or beneficial owners) of Redfish
Common Stock between the Election Form Record Date and the
close of business on the business day prior to the Election
Deadline, and Redfish shall provide to the Exchange Agent all
information reasonably necessary for it to perform as specified
herein.
(iv) Any election shall have been properly made only if the
Exchange Agent shall have received a properly completed Election
Form by the Election Deadline. An Election Form shall be deemed
properly completed only (i) if accompanied by one or more
Certificates (or customary affidavits and, if required by Dorado
or the Surviving Entity, the posting by such person of a bond,
in such reasonable amount as the Surviving Entity may direct, as
indemnity against any claim that may be made against it with
respect to such Certificate)
and/or
(ii) upon receipt of an agents message by
the Exchange Agent or such other evidence of transfer of Book
Entry Shares to the Exchange Agent as the Exchange Agent may
reasonably request, collectively representing all shares of
Redfish Common Stock covered by such Election Form, together
with duly executed transmittal materials included in the
Election Form. Any Election Form may be revoked or changed by
the person submitting such Election Form, by written notice
received by the Exchange Agent prior to the Election Deadline.
In the event an Election Form is revoked prior to the Election
Deadline, the shares of Redfish Common Stock represented by such
Election Form shall become Non-Election Shares and Dorado shall
cause the Certificates representing such shares of Redfish
Common Stock or Book-Entry Shares to be promptly returned
without charge to the person submitting the Election Form upon
written request to that effect from the holder who submitted the
Election Form, except to the extent (if any) a subsequent
election is properly made with respect to any or all of such
shares of Redfish Common Stock. Subject to the terms of this
Agreement and of the Election Form, the Exchange Agent, in
consultation with Dorado and Redfish, shall have reasonable
discretion to determine whether any election, revocation or
change has been properly or timely made and to disregard
immaterial defects in the Election Forms, and any good faith
decisions of the Exchange Agent regarding such matters shall be
binding and conclusive. None of Dorado, Redfish or the Exchange
Agent shall be under any obligation to notify any person of any
defect in an Election Form.
(c) Cancellation of Shares (other than Redfish
Excluded Shares and Redfish Subsidiary
Shares). As a result of the Merger and without
any action on the part of the holders thereof, at the Effective
Time, all shares of Redfish Common Stock (other than Redfish
Excluded Shares and any Redfish Subsidiary Shares) shall cease
to be outstanding and shall be canceled and retired and shall
cease to exist, and each certificate that immediately prior to
the Effective Time represented any shares of Redfish Common
Stock (other than Redfish Excluded Shares and any Redfish
Subsidiary Shares) (the Certificates) and
each Book Entry Share shall thereafter represent only the right
to receive the Merger Consideration with respect to the shares
of Redfish Common Stock formerly represented thereby, and any
dividends or other distributions to which the holders thereof
are entitled pursuant to Section 2.2(c). For purposes of
this Agreement, Redfish Excluded Shares shall
mean (i) any shares of Redfish Common Stock held by Dorado,
Redfish or any direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of
Dorado, in each case except for any such shares held on behalf
of third parties, and (ii) any Dissenting Shares. For
purposes of this Agreement, Redfish Subsidiary
Shares shall mean any shares of Redfish Common Stock
held by any direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of
Redfish except for any such shares held on behalf of third
parties.
(d) Cancellation of Redfish Excluded Shares and
Redfish Subsidiary Shares. Each Redfish Excluded
Share and each Redfish Subsidiary Share at the Effective Time
shall, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the
part of the holder thereof, cease to be outstanding and shall be
canceled and retired without payment of any consideration
therefor, and no Dorado Common Stock or other consideration
shall be delivered
A-4
in exchange therefor, subject to the right of the holder of any
Dissenting Shares to receive the payment to which reference is
made in Section 2.4.
(e) Dorado. At the Effective Time,
each share of Dorado Common Stock issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time shall continue to be one
validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable share of common
stock, par value $.001 per share, of the Surviving Entity.
(f) Employee Stock Options; Restricted Stock.
(i) In accordance with the terms of Redfishs 2000
Incentive Stock Plan (the 2000 Stock Plan) or
Redfishs 2008 Incentive Stock Plan (the 2008
Stock Plan), each holder of an option to purchase
shares of Redfish Common Stock (in each case, an
Option), shall have such Option that is then
outstanding, whether or not exercisable or vested, converted
into an obligation of the Surviving Entity to pay to the holder
thereof, an amount in cash equal to the product of (i) the
number of shares of Redfish Common Stock previously subject to
such Option, whether or not then exercisable or vested, and
(ii) the excess, if any, of (A) in the case of the
2000 Stock Plan, the Change in Control Price, as
defined in the 2000 Stock Plan, or (B) in the case of the
2008 Stock Plan, the Per Share Cash Election Consideration, in
either case, over the exercise price per share previously
subject to such Option, without interest and reduced by any
applicable withholding.
(ii) Except as set forth in (iii) below with respect
to Redfish 2009 Bonus Restricted Shares, subject to the terms
and upon the conditions herein, as of the Effective Time, the
restrictions on each Redfish Restricted Share granted and then
outstanding under the 2000 Stock Plan or the 2008 Stock Plan
shall, without any action on the part of the holder thereof,
Redfish or Dorado, lapse, each such Redfish Restricted Share
will be fully vested in each holder thereof at that time, and
each such Redfish Restricted Share will be treated at the
Effective Time the same as, and have the same rights and be
subject to the same conditions as, each share of Redfish Common
Stock not subject to any restrictions, except that upon that
vesting the holder may satisfy the applicable withholding Tax
obligations by returning to the Surviving Entity a sufficient
number of shares of Redfish Common Stock equal in value to that
obligation. Prior to the Effective Time, Redfish, the Redfish
Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee of such board
shall take all actions necessary under the 2000 Stock Plan, the
2008 Stock Plan, the award agreements thereunder and otherwise
to effectuate this Section 2.1(f)(ii). For purposes of this
Agreement, Redfish Restricted Shares shall
mean shares of restricted Redfish Common Stock granted and
awarded pursuant to the 2000 Stock Plan or the 2008 Stock Plan
(excluding any such shares the restrictions on which have lapsed
prior to the Effective Time and excluding Redfish 2009 Bonus
Restricted Shares).
(iii) Each Redfish 2009 Bonus Restricted Share shall be
converted into Converted Restricted Shares in accordance with
Section 6.8(c) of the Agreement. As of the Effective Time,
Dorado shall assume the obligations of Redfish under the 2008
Stock Plan. Dorado shall cause the registration of the Converted
Restricted Shares to become effective as part of a registration
statement on
Form S-8,
or any successor or other appropriate forms, no later than the
Effective Time, and shall maintain the effectiveness of such
registration statement or registration statements, including the
current status of any related prospectus, for so long as the
Converted Restricted Shares remain outstanding. With respect to
those individuals, if any, who subsequent to the Effective Time
will be subject to the reporting requirements under
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, where applicable, Dorado
shall use all reasonable efforts to administer or cause to be
administered the 2008 Stock Plan in a manner that complies with
Rule 16b-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act to the extent the 2008 Stock
Plan complied with such rule prior to the Effective Time.
(iv) Redfish shall make arrangements reasonably
satisfactory to Dorado to satisfy all employment and income tax
withholding requirements with respect to each award under the
2000 Stock Plan and the 2008 Stock Plan that vests pursuant to
this Section 2.1(f).
Section 2.2 Exchange
of Shares.
(a) Exchange Fund. As of the
Effective Time, Dorado shall appoint a commercial bank or trust
company or such other party as is reasonably satisfactory to
Redfish to act as exchange agent hereunder for
A-5
the purpose of exchanging Certificates and Book Entry Shares for
the Merger Consideration (the Exchange
Agent). Prior to the Effective Time, Dorado shall
deposit with the Exchange Agent, in trust for the benefit of
holders of shares of Redfish Common Stock, the number of shares
of Dorado Common Stock that are issuable pursuant to
Section 2.1 and an amount of cash representing the
aggregate cash consideration payable pursuant to
Section 2.1. Dorado shall deposit such shares of Dorado
Common Stock with the Exchange Agent by delivering to the
Exchange Agent certificates representing, or providing to the
Exchange Agent an uncertificated book-entry for, such shares. In
addition, Dorado shall make available to the Exchange Agent from
time to time as needed, cash sufficient to make payments for the
cash consideration pursuant to Section 2.1, payments in
lieu of fractional shares pursuant to Section 2.2(e) and
any dividends and other distributions pursuant to
Section 2.2(c). Any cash and shares of Dorado Common Stock
deposited by Dorado with the Exchange Agent shall hereinafter be
referred to as the Exchange Fund.
(b) Exchange Rules. Promptly after
the Effective Time, Dorado shall cause the Exchange Agent to
mail to each holder of record of one or more shares of Redfish
Common Stock as of the Effective Time (other than any holder
which has previously and properly surrendered all of its
Certificate(s) to the Exchange Agent in accordance with
Section 2.1(b) (each, an Electing
Stockholder)): (i) a letter of transmittal (the
Letter of Transmittal), which shall specify
that delivery shall be effected, and risk of loss and title to
the shares of Redfish Common Stock shall pass, only upon
delivery of the corresponding Certificates to the Exchange Agent
or receipt by the Exchange Agent of an agents
message with respect to Book Entry Shares, which letter
shall be in customary form and have such other provisions as
Dorado may reasonably specify, and (ii) instructions for
effecting the surrender of such Certificates or Book Entry
Shares in exchange for the Merger Consideration. Each holder of
shares of Redfish Common Stock that have been converted into a
right to receive the Merger Consideration, upon (i) with
respect to any Electing Stockholder, completion of the
calculations required by Section 2.1(a) or (ii) with
respect to any holder that is not an Electing Stockholder,
surrender of a Certificate or Book Entry Shares to the Exchange
Agent together with such Letter of Transmittal, duly executed
and completed in accordance with the instructions thereto, and
such other documents as may reasonably be required by the
Exchange Agent, will be entitled to receive in exchange therefor
(i) one or more shares of Dorado Common Stock which shall
be in uncertificated book-entry form unless a physical
certificate is requested and which shall represent, in the
aggregate, the whole number of shares that such holder has the
right to receive pursuant to Section 2.1(a) (after taking
into account all shares of Redfish Common Stock then held by
such holder) and (ii) a check in the amount equal to any
cash that such holder has the right to receive pursuant to this
Article II, consisting of the cash consideration pursuant
to Section 2.1(a), cash in lieu of any fractional shares of
Dorado Common Stock, as the case may be, pursuant to
Section 2.2(e) and any dividends and other distributions
pursuant to Section 2.2(c). No interest will be paid or
will accrue on any cash payable pursuant to Section 2.1(a),
Section 2.2(c) or Section 2.2(e). In the event of a
transfer of ownership of Redfish Common Stock that is not
registered in the transfer records of Redfish, one or more
shares of Dorado Common Stock evidencing, in the aggregate, the
proper number of shares of Dorado Common Stock and a check in
the proper amount of any cash consideration pursuant to
Section 2.1(a), cash in lieu of any fractional shares of
Dorado Common Stock pursuant to Section 2.2(e) and any
dividends or other distributions to which such holder is
entitled pursuant to Section 2.2(c), may be issued with
respect to such Redfish Common Stock, as the case may be, to
such a transferee if the Certificate representing such shares of
Redfish Common Stock is presented to the Exchange Agent,
accompanied by all documents required to evidence and effect
such transfer and to evidence that any applicable stock transfer
taxes have been paid.
(c) Distributions with Respect to Unexchanged
Shares. All shares of Dorado Common Stock to be
issued pursuant to the Merger shall be deemed issued and
outstanding as of the Effective Time. No dividends or other
distributions declared or made in respect of Dorado Common Stock
shall be paid to the holder of any shares of Redfish Common
Stock until the holder of such shares shall surrender such
shares in accordance with this Article II. Subject to
applicable law, following surrender of any such shares, there
shall be issued
and/or paid
to the holder of the certificates representing whole shares of
Dorado Common Stock issued in exchange therefor, without
interest, (i) at the time of such surrender, the dividends
or other distributions payable in respect of such shares of
Dorado Common Stock with a record date after the Effective Time
and a payment date on or prior to the date of such surrender and
not previously paid and (ii) at the appropriate payment
date, the dividends or other distributions payable with respect
to such shares of Dorado Common
A-6
Stock with a record date after the Effective Time but on or
prior to the date of such surrender and with a payment date
subsequent to such surrender.
(d) No Further Ownership Rights in Redfish Common
Stock. All shares of Dorado Common Stock issued
and cash paid upon conversion of shares of Redfish Common Stock
in accordance with the terms of this Article II (including
any cash paid pursuant to Section 2.2(c) or
Section 2.2(e)) shall be deemed to have been issued or paid
in full satisfaction of all rights pertaining to the shares of
Redfish Common Stock previously represented by such Certificates
and/or Book
Entry Shares.
(e) No Fractional Shares of Dorado Common
Stock.
(i) No certificates or scrip or shares of Dorado Common
Stock representing fractional shares of Dorado Common Stock or
book-entry credit of the same shall be issued upon the surrender
for exchange of Certificates and such fractional share interests
will not entitle the owner thereof to vote or to have any rights
of a stockholder of Dorado.
(ii) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement,
each holder of shares of Redfish Common Stock exchanged pursuant
to the Merger who would otherwise have been entitled to receive
a fractional share of Dorado Common Stock (after taking into
account all Certificates
and/or Book
Entry Shares held by such holder) shall receive, in lieu
thereof, cash (without interest) in an amount equal to the
product of (A) such fractional part of a share of Dorado
Common Stock multiplied by (B) the closing price for a
share of Dorado Common Stock on the NYSE Composite Transactions
Tape on the business day immediately preceding the Closing Date.
(iii) As promptly as practicable after the determination of
the amount of cash, if any, to be paid to holders of fractional
interests, the Exchange Agent shall so notify Dorado, and Dorado
shall deposit such amount with the Exchange Agent and shall
cause the Exchange Agent to forward payments to such holders of
fractional interests subject to and in accordance with the terms
hereof.
(f) Termination of Exchange
Fund. Any portion of the Exchange Fund that
remains undistributed to the holders of Certificates
and/or Book
Entry Shares as of the date six months after the Effective Time
shall be delivered to Dorado or otherwise on the instruction of
Dorado, and any holders of the Certificates
and/or Book
Entry Shares who have not theretofore complied with this
Article II shall thereafter look only to Dorado for the
Merger Consideration with respect to the shares of Redfish
Common Stock formerly represented thereby to which such holders
are entitled pursuant to Section 2.1, cash in lieu of
fractional shares of Dorado Common Stock to which such holders
are entitled pursuant to Section 2.2(e) and any dividends
or distributions with respect to shares of Dorado Common Stock
to which such holders are entitled pursuant to
Section 2.2(c). Any such portion of the Exchange Fund
remaining unclaimed by holders of shares of Redfish Common Stock
five years after the Effective Time (or such earlier date
immediately prior to such time as such amounts would otherwise
escheat to or become property of any Governmental Authority)
shall, to the extent permitted by applicable law, become the
property of Dorado free and clear of any claims or interest of
any person previously entitled thereto.
(g) No Liability. None of Dorado,
Redfish, the Surviving Entity, any affiliate of any of the
foregoing or the Exchange Agent shall be liable to any person in
respect of any Merger Consideration from the Exchange Fund
delivered to a public official or Governmental Authority
pursuant to any applicable abandoned property, escheat or
similar law.
(h) Investment of the Exchange
Fund. The Exchange Agent shall invest any cash
included in the Exchange Fund as directed by Dorado on a daily
basis; provided that no such gain or loss thereon shall
affect the amounts payable to the stockholders of Redfish
pursuant to this Article II and that if at any time prior
to the termination of the Exchange Fund pursuant to
Section 2.2(f), the amount of cash included in the Exchange
Fund is reduced below the amount necessary to pay the cash
component of any unpaid Merger Consideration, any cash in lieu
of fractional shares of Dorado Common Stock payable pursuant to
Section 2.2(e), and dividends and distributions payable
pursuant to Section 2.2(c), Dorado shall promptly deposit
additional cash
A-7
into the Exchange Fund sufficient to rectify this deficiency.
Any interest and other income resulting from such investments
shall be paid promptly to Dorado.
(i) Lost Certificates. If any
Certificate shall have been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the
making of an affidavit of that fact by the person claiming such
Certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed and, if reasonably
required by Dorado, the posting by such person of a bond in such
reasonable amount as Dorado may direct as indemnity against any
claim that may be made against it with respect to such
Certificate, the Exchange Agent shall deliver in exchange for
such lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate the applicable Merger
Consideration, any cash in lieu of fractional shares of Dorado
Common Stock to which the holder is entitled pursuant to
Section 2.2(e) and any dividends and distributions with
respect to shares of Dorado Common Stock to which the holder is
entitled pursuant to Section 2.2(c), in each case with
respect to the shares of Redfish Common Stock formerly
represented by such lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate.
(j) Withholding Rights. Each of the
Exchange Agent and the Surviving Entity shall be entitled,
without duplication, to deduct and withhold from the
consideration otherwise payable pursuant to this Agreement to
any holder of shares of Redfish Common Stock, Redfish Restricted
Shares or any other equity rights in Redfish such amounts as it
is required to deduct and withhold with respect to the making of
such payment under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the Code), and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder, or any provision of applicable law and
shall further be entitled to sell Dorado Common Stock otherwise
payable pursuant to this Agreement to satisfy any such
withholding requirement (which Dorado Common Stock will be
valued with respect to such withholding at the average of the
high and low trading prices of Dorado Common Stock on the NYSE
on the day of such sale). To the extent that amounts are so
withheld by the Exchange Agent or Dorado, as the case may be,
and paid over to the applicable Governmental Authority, such
withheld amounts shall be treated for all purposes of this
Agreement as having been paid to the person in respect of which
such deduction and withholding was made.
(k) Further Assurances. After the
Effective Time, the officers and directors of the Surviving
Entity will be authorized to execute and deliver, in the name
and on behalf of Redfish, any deeds, bills of sale, assignments
or assurances and to take and do, in the name and on behalf of
Redfish, any other actions and things to vest, perfect or
confirm of record or otherwise in the Surviving Entity any and
all right, title and interest in, to and under any of the
rights, properties or assets acquired or to be acquired by the
Surviving Entity as a result of, or in connection with, the
Merger.
(l) Stock Transfer Books. The stock
transfer books of Redfish shall be closed immediately upon the
Effective Time and there shall be no further registration of
transfers of shares of Redfish Common Stock thereafter on the
records of Redfish. At or after the Effective Time, any
Certificates or Book Entry Shares presented to the Exchange
Agent or Dorado for any reason shall represent the right to
receive the Merger Consideration with respect to the shares of
Redfish Common Stock formerly represented thereby (including any
cash in lieu of fractional shares of Dorado Common Stock to
which the holders thereof are entitled to pursuant to
Section 2.2(e)) and any dividends or other distributions to
which the holders thereof are entitled pursuant to
Section 2.2(c).
Section 2.3 Certain
Adjustments. If, subsequent to the date of this
Agreement but prior to the Effective Time, the outstanding
Dorado Common Stock or Redfish Common Stock shall have been
changed by reason of any reclassification, recapitalization,
stock split,
split-up,
combination or exchange of shares, or a stock dividend or
dividend payable in any other securities shall be declared with
a record date within such period, or any similar event shall
have occurred, the Merger Consideration, the Per Share Mixed
Election Cash Amount, the Mixed Election Stock Exchange Ratio,
the Exchange Ratio and any other similarly dependent items, as
the case may be, shall be appropriately adjusted to provide to
the holders of Redfish Common Stock consideration having the
same economic effect as was contemplated by this Agreement prior
to such event.
Section 2.4 Appraisal
Rights. No holder of Dissenting Shares (a
Dissenting Stockholder) shall be entitled to
any Merger Consideration, cash in lieu of fractional shares of
Dorado Common Stock pursuant to Section 2.2(e), or
dividends or other distributions pursuant to Section 2.2(c)
in respect of such Dissenting Shares unless and until such
holder shall have failed to perfect or shall have effectively
withdrawn or lost such holders right to seek appraisal of
its Dissenting Shares under the DGCL, and any Dissenting
Stockholder shall
A-8
be entitled to receive only the payment provided by
Section 262 of the DGCL with respect to the Dissenting
Shares owned by such Dissenting Stockholder. If any person who
otherwise would be deemed a Dissenting Stockholder shall have
failed properly to perfect or shall have effectively withdrawn
or lost the right to seek appraisal with respect to any
Dissenting Shares, such Dissenting Shares shall thereupon be
treated as though such Dissenting Shares had been converted into
the Merger Consideration pursuant to Section 2.1(a).
Redfish shall give Dorado (a) prompt notice of any written
demands for appraisal, attempted withdrawals of such demands,
and any other instruments served pursuant to applicable law
received by Redfish relating to stockholders rights of
appraisal and (b) the opportunity to direct all
negotiations and proceedings with respect to demand for
appraisal under the DGCL. Redfish shall not, except with the
prior written consent of Dorado, voluntarily make any payment
with respect to any demands for appraisals of Dissenting Shares,
offer to settle or settle any such demands or approve any
withdrawal of any such demands. For purposes of this Agreement,
Dissenting Shares means shares of Redfish
Common Stock as to which the holder thereof has exercised
appraisal rights pursuant to Section 262 of the DGCL.
Section 2.5 Associated
Rights. References in this Agreement to Redfish
Common Stock shall include, unless the context requires
otherwise, the associated rights (the Redfish
Rights) distributed to the holders of Redfish Common
Stock pursuant to the Rights Agreement, dated as of
October 28, 2008, between Redfish and Mellon Investor
Services LLC, as rights agent, as amended to date (the
Rights Agreement).
ARTICLE III
Representations
and Warranties of Redfish
Redfish hereby represents and warrants to Dorado that,
(i) except as otherwise set forth in Redfishs
Schedules to this Agreement (it being agreed that disclosure of
any item in any section of Redfishs Schedules shall also
be deemed to be disclosed with respect to any other section of
this Agreement to which the relevance of such item is reasonably
apparent) or (ii) other than with respect to
Sections 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.7(a), 3.7(b) or 3.9(a),
except as reasonably apparent from the Redfish SEC Reports or
the MLP SEC Reports filed with the SEC on or after
January 1, 2009 and prior to the date of this Agreement
(excluding any disclosures set forth in any section of a Redfish
SEC Report or MLP SEC Report entitled Risk Factor or
Forward-Looking Statements or any other disclosures
included in such filings to the extent that they are cautionary,
predictive or forward-looking in nature):
Section 3.1 Organization
and Qualification; Subsidiaries. Each of Redfish
and each subsidiary of Redfish (each, a Redfish
Subsidiary, and collectively, the Redfish
Subsidiaries) has been duly organized and is validly
existing and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction
of its organization and has the requisite corporate or entity
power and authority and all necessary governmental approvals to
own, lease and operate its properties and to carry on its
business as it is now being conducted, except where the failure
to be so organized, existing or in good standing or to have such
power, authority and governmental approvals would not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Redfish Material
Adverse Effect. Redfish and each Redfish Subsidiary is duly
qualified or licensed as a foreign corporation, limited
liability company or limited partnership to do business, and is
in good standing, in each jurisdiction where the character of
the properties owned, leased or operated by it or the nature of
its business makes such qualification or licensing necessary,
except for such failures to be so qualified or licensed and in
good standing that would not, individually or in the aggregate,
have a Redfish Material Adverse Effect. A true and complete list
of all the Redfish Subsidiaries as of the date of this
Agreement, together with the jurisdiction of incorporation or
formation of each Redfish Subsidiary and the percentage of the
outstanding capital stock or other equity interest of each
Redfish Subsidiary owned by Redfish and each other Redfish
Subsidiary as of such date, is set forth in
Schedule 3.1. Except as set forth in
Schedule 3.1, as of the date of this Agreement, Redfish
does not directly or indirectly own any equity or similar
interest in, or any interest convertible into or exchangeable or
exercisable for, any equity or similar interest in, any
corporation, partnership, joint venture or other business
association or entity, other than indirect equity and similar
interests held for investment which are not, individually or in
the aggregate, material to Redfish. The term Redfish
Material Subsidiaries means those subsidiaries
indicated
A-9
as material on Schedule 3.1. Except for the Redfish
Material Subsidiaries, no Redfish Subsidiary is material to the
business, operations or financial condition of Redfish or has
any material assets or liabilities.
Section 3.2 Organizational
Documents. Redfish has heretofore furnished to
Dorado a complete and correct copy of the charter and the bylaws
or equivalent organizational documents, each as amended to date,
of Redfish and each Redfish Material Subsidiary. Such charter
and bylaws or equivalent organizational documents are in full
force and effect. Neither Redfish nor any Redfish Material
Subsidiary is in violation of any provision of its charter,
bylaws or equivalent organizational documents.
Section 3.3 Capitalization.
(a) The authorized capital stock of Redfish consists of
144,000,000 shares of Redfish Common Stock and
5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per
share (Redfish Preferred Stock), of which
1,440,000 shares have been designated Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock and reserved for issuance upon
exercise of Redfish Rights distributed to the holders of Redfish
Common Stock pursuant to the Rights Agreement. As of
October 30, 2009, (i) 55,541,823 shares of
Redfish Common Stock were issued and outstanding, all of which
were validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable, (ii) no
shares of Redfish Common Stock were held in treasury, and
(iii) 3,905,522 shares of Redfish Common Stock were
reserved for issuance pursuant to Options. As of the date
hereof, no shares of Redfish Preferred Stock are issued and
outstanding. Since October 30, 2009 to the date of this
Agreement, Redfish has not issued any shares of capital stock or
granted any options covering shares of capital stock, except in
connection with the exercise of Options issued and outstanding
on October 30, 2009. Except as set forth in this
Section 3.3 or in Schedule 3.3, and except for
the Redfish Rights, there are no options, warrants or other
rights, agreements, arrangements or commitments of any character
obligating Redfish or any Redfish Subsidiary to issue or sell
any shares of capital stock of, or other equity interests in,
Redfish or any Redfish Subsidiary. All shares subject to
issuance as aforesaid, upon issuance on the terms and conditions
specified in the instruments pursuant to which they are
issuable, will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid
and nonassessable and will not be subject to any preemptive
rights. Except as set forth in Schedule 3.3, there
are no outstanding contractual obligations of Redfish or any
Redfish Subsidiary to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire
any shares of capital stock of Redfish or any Redfish Subsidiary
except in connection with the exercise of Options issued and
outstanding on October 30, 2009 or to provide funds to, or
make any investment (in the form of a loan, capital contribution
or otherwise) in, any Redfish Subsidiary or any other person.
Except as set forth in Schedule 3.3, all of the
outstanding capital stock of, or other ownership interests in,
each Redfish Subsidiary is owned by Redfish, directly or
indirectly, free and clear of all security interests, liens,
claims, pledges, options, rights of first refusal, agreements,
limitations on Redfishs or such other Redfish
Subsidiarys voting rights, charges and other encumbrances
of any nature whatsoever. Subject to the foregoing, the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
will not effect or result in any change in the ownership of
Redfish or of any Redfish Subsidiary except as expressly
contemplated by this Agreement.
(b) Redfish, or a wholly owned Redfish Subsidiary, owns all
the outstanding membership interests in Redfish Energy Partners
GP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the MLP
General Partner). The MLP General Partner is the sole
general partner of Redfish Energy Partners LP, a Delaware
limited partnership (the MLP), and, as of the
date of this Agreement, holds 504,851 general partner units in
the MLP (the GP Interest). The GP
Interest has been duly authorized and validly issued in
accordance with the terms of the Second Amended and Restated
Agreement of Limited Partnership of the MLP (as so amended and
restated, the Partnership Agreement), and the
MLP General Partner owns the GP Interest free and clear of all
security interests, liens, claims, pledges, options, rights of
first refusal, agreements, limitations on voting rights, charges
and other encumbrances of any nature whatsoever. As of
October 30, 2009, (i) Redfish owned, directly or
indirectly, 20,924,055 Common Units (as defined in the
Partnership Agreement), and (ii) 45,285,347 Common Units
were outstanding, all of which are duly authorized by the
Partnership Agreement, were validly issued to or acquired by
Redfish or a wholly owned Redfish Subsidiary, and are fully paid
and nonassessable (except as such nonassessability may be
affected by matters described in
Sections 17-303
and 17-607
of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act).
A-10
Section 3.4 Authority;
Due Authorization; Binding Agreement; Approval.
(a) Redfish has all requisite corporate power and authority
to enter into this Agreement and to perform its obligations
under this Agreement, subject, with respect to the Merger, to
the Redfish Stockholder Approval under the DGCL.
(b) The execution, delivery and performance of this
Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated
hereby have been duly and validly authorized by all requisite
corporate action on the part of Redfish (other than, with
respect to the Merger, the Redfish Stockholder Approval and the
filing and recordation of appropriate merger documents as
required by the DGCL).
(c) This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by
Redfish and, assuming the due authorization, execution and
delivery hereof by Dorado, constitutes a legal, valid and
binding obligation of Redfish enforceable against Redfish in
accordance with its terms, subject, however, to the effects of
bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and other
similar laws affecting creditors rights generally and to
general principles of equity (regardless of whether such
enforceability is considered in a proceeding in equity or at
law).
(d) The board of directors of Redfish (the Redfish
Board of Directors), at a meeting duly called and
held, has unanimously (i) determined that this Agreement
and the transactions contemplated hereby (including the Merger)
are advisable, (ii) approved and adopted this Agreement and
the transactions contemplated hereby (including the Merger), and
(iii) resolved (subject to Section 6.3) to recommend
the adoption of this Agreement by the stockholders of Redfish
(the Redfish Stockholders), all of which
determinations, approvals and resolutions have not been
rescinded, modified or withdrawn as of the date hereof.
Section 3.5 No
Violation; Consents.
(a) Except as set forth in Schedule 3.5, the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby will not
violate, conflict with or result in a breach of any provision
of, constitute a default (or an event which, with notice or
lapse of time or both, would constitute a default) under, result
in the termination of, accelerate the performance required by,
result in a right of termination or acceleration under, require
any offer to purchase or any prepayment of any debt or result in
the creation of any lien, security interest or encumbrance upon
any of the properties, or assets of Redfish or any of the
Redfish Subsidiaries under any of the terms, conditions or
provisions of (i) any provision of the governing documents
of Redfish or any Redfish Subsidiary, (ii) any provision of
any contract or agreement or any bank loan, indenture or credit
agreement, in each case to which Redfish or any Redfish
Subsidiary is a party, (iii) assuming the governmental
filings, approvals, consents and authorizations referred to in
Section 3.5(b) are duly and timely made or obtained and
that the Redfish Stockholder Approval in accordance with the
DGCL is duly obtained, any applicable law, ordinance, rule or
regulation of any Governmental Authority or (iv) any
applicable order, writ, judgment or decree of any court or other
competent authority, other than, in the case of (ii),
(iii) and (iv) above, for such violations, defaults or
other occurrences which do not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Redfish Material Adverse Effect.
(b) Except for (i) any required filings under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and the rules
and regulations thereunder (the HSR Act),
(ii) the filing and recordation of appropriate merger
documents as required by the DGCL or applicable law of other
states in which Redfish is qualified to do business,
(iii) the applicable requirements of (A) the
Securities Act of 1933 (including the rules and regulations
thereunder, the Securities Act), the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (including the rules and
regulations thereunder, the Exchange Act) and
any other applicable U.S. state or federal securities laws,
and (B) the NYSE, (iv) any governmental
authorizations, consents, approvals or filings necessary for
transfers of permits and licenses or made in connection with the
transfer of interests in or the change of control of ownership
in oil and natural gas properties and (v) such other
authorizations, consents, approvals or filings the failure of
which to obtain or make would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Redfish Material Adverse Effect or prevent or
materially delay consummation of the Merger, or otherwise
prevent Redfish or any Redfish Subsidiary from performing its
obligations under this Agreement, no authorization, consent or
approval of or filing with any Governmental Authority is
required to be obtained or made by Redfish or any Redfish
Subsidiary for the execution and delivery by Redfish of this
Agreement or the consummation by
A-11
Redfish of the Merger. No authorization, consent or
approval of any nongovernmental third party is required to be
obtained by Redfish or any Redfish Subsidiary for the execution
and delivery by Redfish of this Agreement or the consummation by
Redfish of the Merger, except as set forth in
Schedule 3.5 or where failure to obtain such
authorizations, consents or approvals would not prevent or
materially delay the consummation of the Merger, or otherwise
prevent Redfish from performing its obligations under this
Agreement, and would not, individually or in the aggregate, have
a Redfish Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.6 Compliance.
(a) Except with respect to employee benefit matters, Tax
matters and Environmental Laws, which are addressed exclusively
in Sections 3.11, 3.14 and 3.15, respectively, or as set
forth in Schedule 3.6, neither Redfish nor any Redfish
Subsidiary is in conflict with, or in default or violation of
any applicable law, rule, regulation, order, judgment or decree
of any Governmental Authority having jurisdiction over it,
except for any such conflicts, defaults or violations that do
not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Redfish Material
Adverse Effect.
(b) None of Redfish, any Redfish Subsidiary or, to the
knowledge of Redfish, any director, officer, agent or employee
acting on behalf of Redfish or any Redfish Subsidiary
(i) has used any corporate funds for any unlawful
contribution, gift, entertainment or anything of value relating
to political activity; (ii) made any direct or indirect
unlawful payment to any employee, agent, officer, director,
representative or stockholder of a Governmental Authority or
political party, or official or candidate thereof, or any
immediate family member of any of the foregoing; or
(iii) has made any bribe, unlawful rebate, payoff,
influence payment, kickback or other unlawful payment in
connection with the conduct of Redfishs or the Redfish
Subsidiaries businesses. None of Redfish, any
Redfish Subsidiary or, to the knowledge of Redfish, any
director, officer, agent or employee of Redfish or any Redfish
Subsidiary has received any bribes, kickbacks or other improper
payments from vendors, suppliers or other persons. Redfish has
no knowledge that any payment made to a person would be or has
thereafter been offered, given or provided to any foreign
official, political party or official thereof, or to any
candidate for public office.
Section 3.7 SEC
Filings; Financial Statements; Sarbanes-Oxley; Internal
Accounting Controls; Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
(a) Redfish has filed all forms, reports and documents
required to be filed by it with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) since
January 1, 2007 (collectively, the Redfish SEC
Reports). The Redfish SEC Reports were
prepared in all material respects in accordance with the
requirements of the Securities Act, or the Exchange Act, as the
case may be, and none of the Redfish SEC Reports, as of the date
it was filed with the SEC, contained any untrue statement of a
material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not
misleading. The MLP has filed all forms, reports and documents
required to be filed by it with the SEC since September 10,
2007 (collectively, the MLP SEC Reports). The
MLP SEC Reports were prepared in all material respects in
accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, as the case may be, and none of the MLP SEC
Reports, as of the date it was filed with the SEC, contained any
untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make
the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under
which they were made, not misleading. Other than the MLP, no
Redfish Subsidiary is currently required to file any form,
report or other document with the SEC under Section 12 or
15(d) of the Exchange Act.
(b) The historical consolidated financial statements
(including any notes thereto) contained in the Redfish SEC
Reports were prepared in accordance with United States generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) applied
on a consistent basis throughout the periods indicated (except
as may be indicated in the notes thereto and except that
financial statements included with quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
do not contain all GAAP notes to such financial statements) and
each fairly presented, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position, results of operations, and
changes in stockholders equity and cash flows of Redfish
and the consolidated Redfish Subsidiaries as at the respective
dates thereof and for the respective periods indicated therein
(subject, in the case of unaudited statements, to normal and
recurring year-end adjustments). The historical consolidated
financial statements (including any notes thereto) contained in
the
A-12
MLP SEC Reports were prepared in accordance with GAAP applied on
a consistent basis throughout the periods indicated (except as
may be indicated in the notes thereto and except that financial
statements included with quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
do not contain all GAAP notes to such financial statements) and
each fairly presented, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position, results of operations, changes
in partners equity and cash flows of the MLP and its
consolidated subsidiaries as at the respective dates thereof and
for the respective periods indicated therein (subject, in the
case of unaudited statements, to normal and recurring year-end
adjustments).
(c) With respect to each annual report on
Form 10-K
and each quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
included in the Redfish SEC Reports, the chief executive officer
and chief financial officer of Redfish have made all
certifications required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act) and any related rules and
regulations promulgated by the SEC and the NYSE, and the
statements contained in any such certifications are complete and
correct. With respect to each annual report on
Form 10-K
and each quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
included in the MLP SEC Reports, the chief executive officer and
chief financial officer of the MLP General Partner have made all
certifications required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and any
related rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC and the
NYSE, and the statements contained in any such certifications
are complete and correct.
(d) Redfish and the MLP maintain a system of internal
accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurance
that (i) transactions are executed in accordance with
managements general or specific authorizations,
(ii) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with
managements general or specific authorization, and
(iii) the recorded accountability for assets is compared
with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate
action is taken with respect to any differences.
(e) The disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e) of
the Exchange Act) of Redfish are reasonably designed to ensure
that all information (both financial and non-financial) required
to be disclosed by Redfish in the reports that it files or
submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
rules and forms of the SEC, and that all such information is
accumulated and communicated to the management of Redfish as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure and to make the certifications of the chief executive
officer and chief financial officer of Redfish required under
the Exchange Act with respect to such reports. The
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e) of
the Exchange Act) of the MLP are reasonably designed to ensure
that all information (both financial and non-financial) required
to be disclosed by the MLP in the reports that it files or
submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
rules and forms of the SEC, and that all such information is
accumulated and communicated to the management of the MLP
General Partner as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure and to make the certifications of
the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the
MLP General Partner required under the Exchange Act with respect
to such reports.
Section 3.8 Absence
of Undisclosed Liabilities. Except as set forth
in Schedule 3.8, the Redfish SEC Reports or the MLP
SEC Reports, neither Redfish nor any of the Redfish Subsidiaries
has any liabilities or obligations (whether absolute, accrued,
contingent or otherwise) of any nature, except
(a) liabilities, obligations or contingencies
(i) which are accrued or reserved against in the
consolidated financial statements included in the Redfish SEC
Reports or the MLP SEC Reports or reflected in the notes thereto
or (ii) which were incurred in the ordinary course of
business, (b) liabilities, obligations or contingencies
which (i) would not, individually or in the aggregate, have
a Redfish Material Adverse Effect, or (ii) have been
discharged or paid in full prior to the date hereof, and
(c) liabilities, obligations and contingencies which are of
a nature not required to be reflected in the consolidated
financial statements (including the notes thereto) of Redfish
and the Redfish Subsidiaries.
Section 3.9 Absence
of Certain Changes or Events.
(a) Since December 31, 2008, there has not been any
change or event that has had, individually or in the aggregate,
a Redfish Material Adverse Effect.
A-13
(b) Except as set forth in Schedule 3.9, from
December 31, 2008 until the date of this Agreement, other
than regular quarterly distributions of the MLP declared, set
aside or paid in the ordinary course of business or as
contemplated by this Agreement, Redfish and the Redfish
Subsidiaries have conducted their respective businesses only in
the ordinary course and there has not been any (a) change
by Redfish in its accounting methods, principles or practices
materially affecting the consolidated assets, liabilities or
results of operations of Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries,
except insofar as may have been required by GAAP, or
(b) declaration, setting aside or payment of any dividend
or distribution in respect of any capital stock of Redfish or
any redemption, purchase or other acquisition of any of its
securities, except in connection with outstanding Options.
Section 3.10 Litigation. Except
with respect to employee benefit matters, Tax matters and
Environmental Laws, which are addressed exclusively in
Sections 3.11, 3.14 and 3.15, respectively, or as set forth
on Schedule 3.10, there is no (a) action,
administrative proceeding, lawsuit or governmental inquiry
directed against Redfish or any Redfish Subsidiary pending and
publicly filed, or, to the knowledge of Redfish, threatened,
except for such matters as would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Redfish Material Adverse Effect,
(b) action, administrative proceeding, lawsuit or
governmental inquiry pending and publicly filed or, to the
knowledge of Redfish, threatened against Redfish or any Redfish
Subsidiary that is reasonably likely to materially hinder or
impede the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby,
or (c) judgment or settlement obligation outstanding that
is directed specifically against Redfish or the Redfish
Subsidiaries that would have the effect referred to in clause
(b).
Section 3.11 Employee
Benefit Plans.
(a) For purposes of Section 3.11 and
Section 4.11, the following terms have the definitions
given below:
(i) Controlled Group Liability means any
and all liabilities (A) under Title IV of ERISA (as
defined below), (B) under Section 302 of ERISA,
(C) under Sections 412 and 4971 of the Code,
(D) resulting from a violation of the continuation coverage
requirements of Section 601 et seq. of ERISA and
Section 4980B of the Code or the group health plan
requirements of Sections 9801 et seq. of the Code and
Section 701 et seq. of ERISA, and (E) under
corresponding or similar provisions of foreign laws or
regulations.
(ii) ERISA means the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, together with the rules
and regulations issued thereunder.
(iii) ERISA Affiliate means, with
respect to any entity, trade or business, any other entity,
trade or business that is a member of a group described in
Section 414(b), (c), (m) or (o) of the Code or
Section 4001(b)(1) of ERISA that includes the first entity,
trade or business, or that is a member of the same
controlled group as the first entity, trade or
business pursuant to Section 4001(a)(14) of ERISA.
(iv) Plans means all employee benefit
plans, programs and other arrangements providing benefits to any
employee or former employee in respect of services provided to
Redfish or any of the Redfish Subsidiaries or Dorado or any of
the Dorado Subsidiaries, as applicable, or ERISA Affiliates or
to any beneficiary or dependent thereof, and whether covering
one individual or more than one individual, sponsored or
maintained by Redfish or any of the Redfish Subsidiaries or
Dorado or any of the Dorado Subsidiaries, as applicable, or
ERISA Affiliates or to which Redfish or any of the Redfish
Subsidiaries or Dorado or any of the Dorado Subsidiaries, as
applicable, or ERISA Affiliates contributes or is obligated to
contribute or could have any liability. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, the term Plans includes
compensation and benefit arrangements (whether or not subject to
ERISA) or payroll practices, including, without limitation, any
defined benefit or defined contribution pension plan, profit
sharing plan, stock ownership plan, deferred compensation
agreement or arrangement, vacation pay, sickness, disability or
death benefit plan (whether provided through insurance, on a
funded or unfunded basis or otherwise), employee stock option or
stock purchase plan, bonus or incentive plan or program,
long-term incentive programs in the form of restricted stock
grants and stock option grants, severance pay plan, agreement,
practice, arrangement or policy (including statutory severance
and termination indemnity plans), employment agreement,
retention pay, consulting or other compensation agreements,
medical insurance including
A-14
medical, dental, vision, and prescription coverage, life and
accidental death and dismemberment insurance, tuition aid
reimbursement, relocation assistance, expatriate benefits,
retiree medical and life insurance maintained by Redfish or any
of the Redfish Subsidiaries or Dorado or any of the Dorado
Subsidiaries, as applicable, or ERISA Affiliates or to which
Redfish or any of the Redfish Subsidiaries or Dorado or any of
the Dorado Subsidiaries, as applicable, or ERISA Affiliates has
contributed or is obligated to contribute or under which it has
any liability and each other employee benefit plan, program or
arrangement, including each employee benefit plan
(within the meaning of Section 3(3) of ERISA). The term
Redfish Plans means any Plans of Redfish or
the Redfish Subsidiaries, and the term Dorado
Plans means any Plans of Dorado or the Dorado
Subsidiaries.
(b) Schedule 3.11(b) lists all Redfish Plans.
With respect to each Redfish Plan, Redfish has made available to
Dorado a true, correct and complete copy of the following (where
applicable): (i) each writing constituting a part of such
Redfish Plan, including, without limitation, all plan documents
(including amendments), benefit schedules, trust agreements, and
insurance contracts and other funding vehicles; (ii) the
three most recent Annual Reports (Form 5500 Series) and all
accompanying schedules, if any; (iii) the current summary
plan description, if any; (iv) the most recent annual
financial report, if any; (v) the two most recent actuarial
valuations for any defined benefit pension plans; (vi) any
notices to or other communications with any governmental agency,
commission or regulatory body relative to any Redfish Plan in
the past five years; and (vii) the most recent opinion and
determination letters from the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), if any, with respect to any tax
qualified or tax exempt Redfish Plan
and/or trust
or other funding instrument. Except as specifically provided in
the foregoing documents provided to Dorado or as set forth on
Schedule 3.11(b), there are no amendments to any
Redfish Plan that have been adopted or approved, nor has Redfish
or any of the Redfish Subsidiaries or ERISA Affiliates
undertaken to make any such amendments or to adopt or approve
any new Redfish Plan. Redfish maintains only one employee
pension plan, as defined in Section 3(2) of ERISA,
which is a defined contribution plan intended to be qualified
pursuant to Section 401(a) and 501(a) of the Code, and to
be a cash or deferred arrangement within the meaning of
Section 401(k) of the Code (the Redfish 401(k)
Plan). The Redfish 401(k) Plan is maintained on a
nonstandardized prototype plan document, the underlying form of
which has received a favorable opinion letter from the IRS, has
been timely amended as required to reflect changes in applicable
law and, to the knowledge of Redfish as of the date hereof,
nothing has occurred with respect to the operation of the
Redfish 401(k) Plan that would cause the loss of such tax
qualification or exemption or the imposition of any material
liability, penalty or tax under ERISA or the Code. No stock or
other security issued by Redfish or any Redfish Subsidiary forms
or has formed a material part of the assets of any Redfish Plan.
(c) Neither Redfish nor any of the Redfish Subsidiaries or
ERISA Affiliates maintains or contributes to any plan that is
(i) covered by Title IV of ERISA, (ii) subject to
the minimum funding requirements of Section 412 of the
Code, (iii) a Multiemployer Plan as defined in
Section 3(37) of ERISA, (iv) a plan that has two or
more contributing sponsors at least two of whom are not under
common control (within the meaning of Section 4063 of
ERISA) (a Multiple Employer Plan), or subject
to Section 4063 or 4064 of ERISA, or (v) funded by a
voluntary employees beneficiary association within the
meaning of Code Section 501(c)(9), nor has Redfish or any
of the Redfish Subsidiaries or any of their respective ERISA
Affiliates, at any time within six years before the date of this
Agreement, contributed to or been obligated to contribute to any
Multiemployer Plan or Multiple Employer Plan. There does not now
exist, and there are no existing circumstances that could
reasonably be expected to result in, any material Controlled
Group Liability that would be a liability of Redfish or any of
the Redfish Subsidiaries or any of their respective ERISA
Affiliates following the Closing. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, neither Redfish nor any of the
Redfish Subsidiaries or ERISA Affiliates has engaged in any
transaction described in Section 4069 or that constitutes a
withdrawal under Section 4201 et seq. of ERISA.
(d) All contributions required to be made by Redfish or any
of the Redfish Subsidiaries or ERISA Affiliates to any Redfish
Plan by applicable laws or by any plan document or other
contractual undertaking, and all premiums due or payable with
respect to insurance policies funding any Redfish Plan, for any
period through the date hereof have been timely made or paid in
full and through the Closing Date will be timely made or paid in
full.
A-15
(e) Except as set forth on Schedule 3.11(e),
Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries and their respective ERISA
Affiliates have complied, and are now in compliance, in all
material respects, with all provisions of ERISA, the Code and
all laws and regulations (including any applicable local laws)
applicable to the Redfish Plans. Each Redfish Plan has been
operated in material compliance with its terms and has been
maintained, in all material respects, in compliance will all
provisions of ERISA, the Code and other applicable laws. Except
as would not have a Redfish Material Adverse Effect, there is
not now, and there are no existing circumstances that could
reasonably be expected to give rise to, any requirement for the
posting of security with respect to a Redfish Plan or the
imposition of any pledge, lien, security interest or encumbrance
on the assets of Redfish or any of the Redfish Subsidiaries or
any of their respective ERISA Affiliates under ERISA or the
Code, or similar applicable laws of foreign jurisdictions.
Except as would not have a Redfish Material Adverse Effect,
neither Redfish nor any of the Redfish Subsidiaries or their
respective ERISA Affiliates, nor any party in
interest or disqualified person with respect
to any Redfish Plan, has engaged in any nonexempt
prohibited transaction within the meaning of
Section 4975 of the Code or Section 406 of ERISA.
(f) Schedule 3.11(f) sets forth a list of each
Redfish Plan that has assets (or provides benefits) that include
securities issued by Redfish, any of the Redfish Subsidiaries or
any of their respective ERISA Affiliates.
(g) Except as set forth on Schedule 3.11(g),
except for health continuation coverage as required by
Section 4980B of the Code or Part 6 of Title I of
ERISA, neither Redfish nor any of the Redfish Subsidiaries has
any material liability for life, health, medical or other
welfare benefits to former employees or beneficiaries or
dependents thereof. To the knowledge of Redfish, there has been
no communication to employees of Redfish or the Redfish
Subsidiaries that could reasonably be expected or interpreted to
promise or guarantee such employees retiree health or life
insurance benefits or other retiree death benefits on a
permanent basis.
(h) Except as set forth on Schedule 3.11(h),
neither this Agreement nor the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement will result in any forgiveness of indebtedness or
obligation to fund benefits with respect to any employee,
director, independent contractor, consultant or officer of
Redfish or any Redfish Subsidiary, or result in any restriction
on the right to merge, amend or terminate any Redfish Plan, or
result in any new or increased contribution required to be made
to any of the Redfish Plans.
(i) Except as disclosed in Schedule 3.11(i),
there is no pending, or, to the knowledge of Redfish,
threatened, suit, claim, action, proceeding, hearing, notice of
violation, demand letter or investigation (an
Action) (other than claims for benefits in
the ordinary course) that have been asserted or instituted
against any Redfish Plan, any fiduciaries thereof with respect
to their duties to any Redfish Plan or the assets of any of the
trusts under any Redfish Plan that could reasonably be expected
to result in any material liability of Redfish or any of the
Redfish Subsidiaries to any person, the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation, the United States Department of Treasury, the
United States Department of Labor or any Multiemployer Plan, or
to comparable entities or Redfish Plans under applicable laws of
jurisdictions outside the United States.
(j) Schedule 3.11(j) sets forth the names of
all directors and Section 16 officers of Redfish, the total
salary and bonus each will be eligible to receive in the current
Redfish fiscal year, and any changes to the foregoing that will
occur as a matter of entitlement subsequent to such fiscal year
end. Schedule 3.11(j) also sets forth the liability
of Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries for deferred
compensation under any deferred compensation plan, excess plan
or similar arrangement (other than pursuant to Redfish Plans) to
each such director, officer and employee and to all other
employees as a group, together with the value, as of the date
specified thereon, of the assets (if any) set aside in any
grantor trust(s) to fund such liabilities. Except as disclosed
in Schedule 3.11(j), there are no other material
forms of compensation paid to any such director, officer or
employee of Redfish.
(k) No Redfish Plan is subject to the laws of any
jurisdiction outside of the United States.
(l) Except as set forth on Schedule 3.11(l), no
disallowance of a deduction under Section 162(m) of the
Code for employee reimbursement of any amount paid or payable by
Redfish or any of the Redfish Subsidiaries has occurred or is
reasonably expected to occur. All Redfish Plans that are subject
to Section 409A
A-16
of the Code are in material compliance with the requirements of
such Code Section and regulations thereunder.
Section 3.12 Information
Supplied. The information to be supplied in
writing by Redfish for inclusion in the registration statement
on
Form S-4
pursuant to which shares of Dorado Common Stock issued in the
Merger will be registered under the Securities Act (the
Registration Statement) will not, at the time
the Registration Statement is declared effective by the SEC,
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
any material fact required to be stated in the Registration
Statement or necessary in order to make the statements in the
Registration Statement, in light of the circumstances under
which they were made, not misleading. The information supplied
in writing by Redfish for inclusion in the proxy
statement/prospectus to be sent to the Redfish Stockholders
relating to the Redfish Stockholders Meeting and the proxy
statement to be sent to the Dorado Stockholders relating to the
Dorado Stockholders Meeting (such proxy statements together, in
each case as amended or supplemented from time to time, the
Joint Proxy Statement) will not, at the time
the Joint Proxy Statement is first published, sent or given to
Redfish Stockholders and Dorado Stockholders, contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact
required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the
statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which
they are made, not misleading and will not, at the time of the
Redfish Stockholders Meeting or at the time of the Dorado
Stockholders Meeting, omit to state any material fact necessary
to correct any statement in any earlier communication with
respect to the solicitation of proxies for the Redfish
Stockholders Meeting or the Dorado Stockholders Meeting that
shall have become false or misleading in any material respect.
Section 3.13 Properties,
Oil and Gas Matters.
(a) For purposes of this Agreement, Oil and Gas
Properties means direct and indirect interests in and
rights with respect to oil, gas, mineral, and related properties
and assets of any kind and nature, direct or indirect, including
working, leasehold and mineral interests and operating rights
and royalties, overriding royalties, production payments, net
profit interests and other non-working interests and
non-operating interests; all interests in rights with respect to
oil, condensate, gas, casinghead gas and other liquid or gaseous
hydrocarbons (collectively, Hydrocarbons) and
other minerals or revenues therefrom, all contracts in
connection therewith and claims and rights thereto (including
all oil and gas leases, operating agreements, unitization and
pooling agreements and orders, division orders, transfer orders,
mineral deeds, royalty deeds, oil and gas sales, exchange and
processing contracts and agreements, and in each case, interests
thereunder), surface interests, fee interests, reversionary
interests, reservations, and concessions; all easements, rights
of way, licenses, permits, leases, and other interests
associated with, appurtenant to, or necessary for the operation
of any of the foregoing; and all interests in equipment and
machinery (including wells, well equipment and machinery), oil
and gas production, gathering, transmission, treating,
processing, and storage facilities (including tanks, tank
batteries, pipelines, and gathering systems), pumps, water
plants, electric plants, gasoline and gas processing plants,
refineries, and other tangible personal property and fixtures
associated with, appurtenant to, or necessary for the operation
of any of the foregoing.
For purposes of this Agreement, Redfish Oil and Gas
Agreements means the following types of agreements or
contracts to which Redfish or any of the Redfish Subsidiaries is
a party, whether as an original party, by succession or
assignment or otherwise: oil and gas leases, farm-in and
farm-out agreements, agreements providing for an overriding
royalty interest, agreements providing for a royalty interest,
agreements providing for a net profits interest, crude oil or
natural gas sales or purchase contracts, joint operating
agreements, unit operating agreements, unit agreements, field
equipment leases, and agreements restricting Redfish or any of
the Redfish Subsidiaries ability to operate, obtain,
explore for or develop interests in a particular geographic
area. Set forth in Schedule 3.13 is a
list of all Redfish Oil and Gas Agreements that contain
restrictions on Redfishs or any of the Redfish
Subsidiaries ability to operate, obtain, explore for or
develop interests in a particular geographic area that would
reasonably be expected to have a Redfish Material Adverse Effect.
For the purposes of this Agreement, good and defensible
title means title that (i) entitles Redfish or
Dorado, as the case may be (or their respective subsidiaries) to
receive a percentage of the hydrocarbons produced, saved and
marketed from the respective oil, gas and mineral lease, unit or
well throughout the
A-17
duration of the productive life of such lease, unit or well,
which is not less than the net revenue interest
shown on the Redfish Reserve Reports or the Dorado Reserve
Report, as the case may be, for such lease, unit or well, except
for decreases in connection with those operations in which
Redfish or Dorado (or their respective subsidiaries), as
applicable, may be or hereafter become a non-consenting
co-owner; (ii) obligates Redfish or Dorado (or their
respective subsidiaries), as the case may be, to bear a
percentage of the costs and expenses associated with the
ownership, operation, maintenance and repair of any oil, gas and
mineral lease, unit or well which is not greater than the
working interest shown on the Redfish Reserve
Reports or the Dorado Reserve Report, as the case may be, with
respect to such lease, unit or well, without increase throughout
the life of such lease, unit or well other than
(x) increases accompanied by at least a proportionate
increase in the net revenue interest, (y) increases
reflected in the Redfish Reserve Reports or the Dorado Reserve
Report, as applicable, and (z) increases resulting from
contribution requirements with respect to defaulting co-owners
under applicable operating agreements that are accompanied by at
least a proportionate increase in the net revenue interest.
(b) Redfish has furnished to Dorado separate reserve
reports prepared by Miller and Lents, Ltd. containing estimates
of the oil and gas reserves that are owned by Redfish and the
Redfish Subsidiaries (other than the MLP) and that are owned by
the MLP and its subsidiaries, both as of December 31, 2008
(the Redfish Reserve Reports). The factual,
non-interpretive data relating to the Oil and Gas Properties of
Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries (other than the MLP) and
relating to the Oil and Gas Properties of the MLP on which the
Redfish Reserve Reports were based for purposes of estimating
the oil and gas reserves set forth therein, to the knowledge of
Redfish, were accurate in all material respects at the time such
data was provided to the reserve engineers. With respect to the
proved reserves reflected in the Redfish Reserve Reports, the
Redfish Reserve Reports conform in all material respects to the
guidelines with respect thereto of the SEC. Except for changes
(including changes in Hydrocarbon commodity prices) generally
affecting the oil and gas industry and normal depletion by
production, there has been no change in respect of the matters
addressed in the Redfish Reserve Reports that would reasonably
be expected to have a Redfish Material Adverse Effect.
(c) All major items of operating equipment owned or leased
by Redfish or the Redfish Subsidiaries are in a state of repair
so as to be adequate for reasonably prudent operations in the
areas in which they are operated, except as would not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Redfish Material
Adverse Effect.
(d) Except for goods and other property sold, used or
otherwise disposed of since the dates of the Redfish Reserve
Reports in the ordinary course of business or reflected as
having been sold, used or otherwise disposed of in the Redfish
SEC Reports, as of the date hereof, Redfish and the Redfish
Subsidiaries own or have valid leases or contractual rights to,
all equipment and other personal property used or necessary for
use in the operation of its Oil and Gas Properties in the manner
in which such properties were operated as of the date hereof.
(e) Except for property sold or otherwise disposed of since
the dates of the respective Redfish Reserve Reports in the
ordinary course of business or reflected as having been sold or
otherwise disposed of in the Redfish SEC Reports, Redfish and
the Redfish Subsidiaries have good and defensible title to all
Oil and Gas Properties forming the basis for the reserves
reflected in the Redfish Reserve Reports, in each case relating
to the interests referred to therein as of the date of each such
report, and in each case as attributable to interests owned by
Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries, free and clear of any
liens, except: (a) liens reflected in the Redfish Reserve
Reports or in the Redfish SEC Reports filed prior to the date of
this Agreement, (b) Permitted Encumbrances, and
(c) such imperfections of title, easements, liens,
government or tribal approvals or other matters and failures of
title as would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a
Redfish Material Adverse Effect.
(f) Except as would not have a Redfish Material Adverse
Effect, all material proceeds from the sale of Hydrocarbons
produced from the Oil and Gas Properties of Redfish and the
Redfish Subsidiaries are being received by them in a timely
manner and are not being held in suspense for any reason.
(g) The Redfish Oil and Gas Agreements affecting any real
or personal property given value in the Redfish Reserve Reports,
including the Oil and Gas Properties, are in good standing,
valid and effective, and
A-18
the rentals due by Redfish or any of the Redfish Subsidiaries to
any lessor of any such oil and gas leases have been properly
paid, except in each case as would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Redfish Material Adverse Effect. Redfish and
the Redfish Subsidiaries have paid all royalties, overriding
royalties and other burdens on production due by Redfish and the
Redfish Subsidiaries with respect to their Oil and Gas
Properties, except for any nonpayments that individually or in
the aggregate has not had, and would not be reasonably likely to
have a Redfish Material Adverse Effect.
(h) Except as would not have a Redfish Material Adverse
Effect, all Oil and Gas Properties operated by Redfish or the
Redfish Subsidiaries have been operated in all material respects
in accordance with reasonable, prudent oil and gas field
practices and in compliance with the applicable oil and gas
leases and applicable law.
(i) Neither Redfish nor any of the Redfish Subsidiaries has
produced Hydrocarbons from its Oil and Gas Properties in excess
of regulatory allowables or other applicable legal limits on
production that could reasonably be expected to result in
curtailment of production from any such property, except any
such excess production which, individually or in the aggregate,
would not have a Redfish Material Adverse Effect.
(j) Except as set forth in Schedule 3.13(j),
none of the material Oil and Gas Properties of Redfish or of any
of the Redfish Subsidiaries is subject to any preferential
purchase, consent or similar right that would become operative
as a result of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(k) Except as set forth in Schedule 3.13(k),
none of the Oil and Gas Properties of Redfish or of any of the
Redfish Subsidiaries are subject to any tax partnership
agreement or provisions requiring a partnership income tax
return to be filed under Subchapter K of Chapter 1 of
Subtitle A of the Code.
(l) Neither Redfish nor any of the Redfish Subsidiaries has
received any material advance, take-or-pay or other similar
payments that entitle purchasers of production to receive
deliveries of Hydrocarbons without paying therefor, and, on a
net, Redfish-wide basis, Redfish is neither underproduced nor
overproduced, in either case, to any material extent, under gas
balancing or similar arrangements, except as set forth in
Schedule 3.13(l).
Section 3.14 Taxes.
(a) (i) Each of Redfish, the Redfish Subsidiaries and
any affiliated, combined or unitary group of which any such
entity is or was a member has timely (taking into account any
extensions) filed all returns, declarations, reports, estimates,
information returns and statements (Returns)
required to be filed in respect of any Tax that is imposed by
the United States, has filed all state and local Returns in
respect of a Tax that is material, and has timely paid all Taxes
that are shown by such Returns to be due and payable, and
(ii) each of Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries has
established reserves that are adequate in the aggregate for the
payment of all Taxes not yet due and payable with respect to the
results of operations of Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries
through the date of this Agreement, and has complied in all
material respects with all applicable laws, rules and
regulations relating to the payment and withholding of Taxes,
except in each case where the failure to file such Returns or
pay such Tax or the failure to comply in all respects with all
applicable laws, rules and regulations relating to the payment
and withholding of Taxes that would not have a Redfish Material
Adverse Effect.
(b) Except as set forth in Schedule 3.14(b), no
federal income Tax Return of Redfish or the Redfish Subsidiaries
is currently subject to examination by the
IRS. Except as set forth in
Schedule 3.14(b), no federal, state or local income
or franchise tax audit or other administrative proceeding or
court proceeding is presently pending with regard to any
material amount of Tax for which Redfish or any of the Redfish
Subsidiaries would be liable, and no material deficiency which
has not yet been paid for any such Tax has been proposed,
asserted or assessed against Redfish or any of the Redfish
Subsidiaries with respect to any period. Schedule 3.14(b)
sets forth the last taxable period through which the federal
income Tax Returns of Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries have
been examined by the IRS or otherwise closed.
(c) Except as set forth in Schedule 3.14(c),
neither Redfish nor any of the Redfish Subsidiaries has executed
or entered into (or prior to the close of business on the
Closing Date will execute or enter into) with the IRS or any
taxing authority (i) any agreement or other document
extending or having the effect of
A-19
extending the period for assessment or collection of any Tax for
which Redfish or any of the Redfish Subsidiaries would be liable
or (ii) a closing agreement pursuant to Section 7121
of the Code or any similar provision of state or local income
tax law that relates to Redfish or any of the Redfish
Subsidiaries.
(d) Neither Redfish nor any of the Redfish Subsidiaries is
a party to, is bound by or has any obligation under any tax
sharing agreement or similar agreement or arrangement other than
any such agreement or arrangement all the other parties to which
are directly or indirectly wholly owned by Redfish.
(e) Redfish has not been a distributing
corporation and is not a controlled
corporation, in either case, with respect to a
distribution that was purported or intended to be governed by
Section 355 of the Code and that occurred after the date
that is two years before the date of this Agreement and will not
be a distributing corporation with respect to a
distribution that is to occur hereafter and that is part of a
plan or series of related transactions
within the meaning of Section 355(e) of the Code, of which
the Merger is a part.
(f) Neither Redfish nor any of the Redfish Subsidiaries has
taken or agreed to take any action or knows of any fact,
agreement, plan or other circumstance that would be reasonably
likely to prevent the Merger from qualifying as a reorganization
within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(A) of the Code.
(g) Except as set forth in Schedule 3.14(g),
neither Redfish nor any of the Redfish Subsidiaries is the
subject of or bound by any private letter ruling, technical
advice memorandum, closing agreement, or similar ruling,
memorandum or agreement with any taxing authority.
(h) Neither Redfish nor any of the Redfish Subsidiaries has
been a member of any affiliated group (as defined in
Section 1504(a) of the Code) or has been included in any
consolidated unitary or
combined Tax Return (other than returns that include
only Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries) provided for under
any laws of the United States, any foreign jurisdiction, or any
state or locality and none of Redfish nor any of the Redfish
Subsidiaries has any liability for the Taxes of any person
(other than Redfish or any of the Redfish Subsidiaries) under
Treasury
Regulation Section 1.1502-6
or any similar provisions under any state, local or foreign law,
or as a successor or a transferee.
(i) Except as set forth in Schedule 3.14(i),
neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement nor the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
will result in, cause the accelerated vesting or delivery of, or
increase the amount or value of, any payment or benefit to any
employee, officer, director or consultant of Redfish or any of
the Redfish Subsidiaries (either alone or in conjunction with
any other event). Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, except as set forth in Schedule 3.14(i), no
amount paid or payable by Redfish or any Redfish Subsidiaries in
connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
either solely as a result thereof or as a result of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement in conjunction with
any other events, will be a parachute payment within
the meaning of Section 280G of the Code. and neither
Redfish nor any of the Redfish Subsidiaries is a party to any
contract that will have continuing effect after the Closing Date
that under certain circumstances could require any payment (or
be deemed to give rise to any payment) that would be a
parachute payment. Redfish has provided to Dorado
its current good faith estimate of the maximum aggregate amount
of any such parachute payments. Except as set forth in
Schedule 3.14(i), neither Redfish nor any of the
Redfish Subsidiaries is a party to, or otherwise obligated
under, any contract, plan or arrangement that provides for the
gross-up of
Taxes imposed by Section 4999 of the Code.
(j) Except as set forth in Schedule 3.14(j),
neither Redfish nor any of the Redfish Subsidiaries has made or
agreed to make, and is not required to make, any change in
method of accounting previously used by it in any Tax Return
filed by Redfish or any of the Redfish Subsidiaries which change
in method would require Redfish or any of the Redfish
Subsidiaries to make an adjustment to its income pursuant to
Section 481(a) of the Code (or any similar provision) on
any Tax Return for any taxable period for which Redfish or any
of the Redfish Subsidiaries has not yet filed a Tax Return; and
neither is there any application pending with any Governmental
Authority requesting permission for Redfish or any of the
Redfish Subsidiaries to make any change in any accounting
method, nor has Redfish or any of the Redfish Subsidiaries
received any notice that a Governmental Authority proposes to
require a change in method of accounting used in any Tax Return
which has been filed by Redfish or any of the Redfish
Subsidiaries.
A-20
(k) Except as set forth in Schedule 3.14(k),
neither Redfish nor any of the Redfish Subsidiaries has been a
beneficiary or has otherwise participated in any
reportable transaction within the meaning of
Treasury
Regulation Section 1.6011-4(b)(1)
that was, is, or to the knowledge of Redfish will ever be
required to be disclosed under Treasury
Regulation Section 1.6011-4.
No Tax Return filed by or on behalf of Redfish or any of the
Redfish Subsidiaries has contained a disclosure statement under
Section 6662 of the Code (or any similar legal requirement).
(l) Except as set forth in Schedule 3.14(l),
neither Redfish nor any of the Redfish Subsidiaries has received
written notification from a Governmental Authority in a
jurisdiction where Redfish or the Redfish Subsidiaries do not
file Tax Returns that any of them are or may be subject to
taxation by that jurisdiction. Neither Redfish nor any of the
Redfish Subsidiaries has commenced activities in any
jurisdiction which would reasonably be expected to require
Redfish or any of the Redfish Subsidiaries to make an initial
filing of any Tax Return with respect to Taxes imposed by a
Governmental Authority that it had not previously been required
to file in the immediately preceding taxable period.
(m) The MLP is a publicly traded partnership for United
States federal income tax purposes and for each taxable year,
more than 90% of the gross income for federal income tax
purposes of the MLP has been and will be income from
(i) the exploration, development, mining or production,
processing, refining, transportation (including pipelines
transporting gas, oil, or products thereof), or the marketing of
any mineral or natural resource (including fertilizer,
geothermal energy, and timber), industrial source carbon
dioxide, or the transportation or storage of certain fuels or
biodiesel fuels; or (ii) other items of income as to which
counsel has opined or will opine are qualifying
income within the meaning of Section 7704(d) of the
Code. The MLP has been characterized at all times since its
inception as a partnership and not as a corporation for federal
income tax purposes.
(n) In the current taxable year, through the date of this
Agreement, there has been no material change in the MLPs
composition of gross income for federal income tax purposes.
(o) All of the transactions that Redfish and the Redfish
Subsidiaries have accounted for as hedges under SFAS 133
have also been treated as hedging transactions for federal
income tax purposes pursuant to Treasury
Regulation 1.1221-2
and have been properly identified as such under Treasury
Regulation 1.1221-2(f).
(p) Except as set forth in Schedule 3.14(p),
neither Redfish nor any of Redfish Subsidiaries has taken any
action not in accordance with past practice that would have the
effect of deferring Tax from a period (or portion thereof)
ending on or before the Effective Time to a period (or portion
thereof) beginning after the Effective Time. Except as set forth
in Schedule 3.14(p), neither Redfish nor any of
Redfish Subsidiaries has deferred income or Tax liability
arising out of any transaction, except to the extent adequately
reserved for, including without limitation, any
(i) intercompany transaction (as defined in Treasury
Regulation Section 1.1502-13),
(ii) the disposal of any property in a transaction
accounted for under the installment method pursuant to
Section 453 of the Code, (iii) use of the long-term
contract method of accounting or (iv) receipt of any
prepaid amount on or before the Effective Time. Neither Redfish
nor any of Redfish Subsidiaries has filed any consent or entered
into any agreement under Section 341(f) of the Code with
respect to any of its assets.
(q) For purposes of this Agreement,
Taxes shall mean all federal, state, local
and other taxes, charges, fees, levies, imposts, duties,
licenses or other assessments, together with any interest,
penalties, additions to tax or additional amounts imposed by any
taxing authority in respect of a Tax.
Section 3.15 Environmental
Matters. Except as set forth in
Schedule 3.15:
(a) Each of Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries and their
respective properties is in compliance with all applicable
federal, state and local laws (including common law),
ordinances, rules and regulations relating to the environment
including, without limitation, the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980,
42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq., the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C.
§ 6901, et seq., the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.
§ 7401, et seq., the Federal Water Pollution Control
Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251, et seq., the Oil Pollution
Act of 1990, 33 U.S.C.§ 2701, et seq., the Toxic
Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 2601
through 2629, and the Emergency Planning and Community Right to
Know Act, 42 U.S.C. § 11001 et seq., in each
case, as amended and the regulations promulgated pursuant
thereto and
A-21
as each is in effect on the date of this Agreement
(collectively, the Environmental Laws),
except for such instances of noncompliance that, individually or
in the aggregate, would not have a Redfish Material Adverse
Effect.
(b) Each of Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries has
obtained all material permits, licenses, franchise authorities,
consents and approvals, made all material filings and maintained
all material data, documentation and records necessary for
owning and operating its assets and business as it is presently
conducted under all applicable Environmental Laws, and all such
permits, licenses, franchises, authorities, consents, approvals
and filings remain in full force and effect, except for such
matters that, individually or in the aggregate, would not have a
Redfish Material Adverse Effect.
(c) There are no pending or, to the knowledge of Redfish,
threatened claims, demands, actions, administrative proceedings,
lawsuits or investigations against Redfish or any of the Redfish
Subsidiaries or affecting any of their respective properties
under any Environmental Laws that, individually or in the
aggregate, would have a Redfish Material Adverse Effect.
(d) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained
elsewhere in this Agreement, Redfish makes no representation in
this Agreement regarding any compliance or failure to comply
with, or any actual or contingent liability under, or claims,
demands, actions, proceedings, lawsuits or investigations with
respect to any Environmental Law, except as set forth in this
Section 3.15.
Section 3.16 Redfish
Intellectual Property. Except as would not have a
Redfish Material Adverse Effect:
(a) Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries own, or are
licensed to use, all patents, patent rights (including patent
applications and licenses), know-how, trade secrets, trademarks
(including trademark applications), trademark rights, trade
names, trade name rights, service marks, service mark rights,
copyrights and other proprietary intellectual property rights
(collectively, Redfish Intellectual Property)
used in and necessary for the conduct of their business as it is
currently conducted.
(b) To the knowledge of Redfish, the use of Redfish
Intellectual Property by Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries
does not infringe on or otherwise violate the rights of any
third party, and is in accordance in all material respects with
the applicable license pursuant to which Redfish or the Redfish
Subsidiaries acquired the right to use such Redfish Intellectual
Property.
(c) To the knowledge of Redfish, no third party is
challenging, infringing on or otherwise violating any right of
Redfish or the Redfish Subsidiaries in the Redfish Intellectual
Property.
(d) Neither Redfish nor any of the Redfish Subsidiaries has
received any written notice of any pending claim, order or
proceeding with respect to any material Redfish Intellectual
Property used in and necessary for the conduct of Redfishs
business as it is currently conducted.
Section 3.17 Derivative
Transactions and
Hedging. Schedule 3.17 contains a
complete and correct list as of October 30, 2009 of all
outstanding commodity or financial hedging positions entered
into by Redfish or any of the Redfish Subsidiaries or for the
account of any of its customers as of the date of this Agreement
pursuant to which such party has outstanding rights or
obligations (Derivative Transactions). All
such Derivative Transactions were, and any Derivative
Transactions entered into after the date of this Agreement will
be, entered into in accordance with applicable Laws, and in
accordance with the investment, securities, commodities, risk
management and other policies, practices and procedures employed
by Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries, and were, and will be,
entered into with counterparties believed at the time and
currently to be financially responsible. Redfish and each of the
Redfish Subsidiaries have, and will have, duly performed all of
their respective obligations under the Derivative Transactions
to the extent that such obligations to perform have accrued,
and, to the knowledge of Redfish, there are and will be no
breaches, violations, collateral deficiencies, requests for
collateral or demands for payment, or defaults or allegations or
assertions thereof by any party thereunder, except as would not
have a Redfish Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.18 FERC
Jurisdiction. Except as set forth in
Schedule 3.18, any gas gathering system constituting
a part of the properties of Redfish or the Redfish Subsidiaries
and material to the operations of
A-22
Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries considered as a single
enterprise has as its primary function the provision of natural
gas gathering services, as the term gathering is
interpreted by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(FERC) under Section 1(b) of the Natural
Gas Act of 1938 (NGA); none of the properties
has been or is certificated by the FERC under Section 7(c)
of the NGA or to the knowledge of Redfish is now subject to FERC
jurisdiction under the NGA; and none of the properties has been
or is providing service pursuant to Section 311 of the
Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978.
Section 3.19 Insurance. Each
of Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries maintain insurance with
financially responsible insurers in such amounts with such
deductibles and covering such risks and losses as are in
accordance with normal industry practice for companies engaged
in similar businesses. Copies of all material insurance policies
maintained by Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries and all
material financial agreements between insurance companies, on
the one hand, and Redfish and any of the Redfish Subsidiaries,
on the other hand, have been made available to Dorado. Except as
would not have a Redfish Material Adverse Effect, all such
insurance policies are in full force and effect, all premiums
due and payable thereunder have been paid and none of Redfish or
any of the Redfish Subsidiaries is in material default
thereunder. Neither Redfish nor any of the Redfish Subsidiaries
has received any written or, to the knowledge of Redfish, oral
notice of cancellation or termination with respect to any such
insurance policy of Redfish or any of the Redfish Subsidiaries.
To the knowledge of Redfish, there is no material claim pending
under any such policy as to which coverage has been denied or
disputed.
Section 3.20 Labor
Matters. Except for such matters that would not
have, individually or in the aggregate, a Redfish Material
Adverse Effect, neither Redfish nor any of the Redfish
Subsidiaries has received written notice during the past two
years of the intent of any Governmental Authority responsible
for the enforcement of labor, employment, occupational health
and safety or workplace safety and insurance/workers
compensation laws to conduct an investigation of Redfish or any
of the Redfish Subsidiaries and, to the knowledge of Redfish, no
such investigation is in progress. Except for such matters that
would not have, individually or in the aggregate, a Redfish
Material Adverse Effect, (i) there are no (and there have
not been during the two year period preceding the date hereof)
strikes or lockouts with respect to any employees of Redfish or
any of the Redfish Subsidiaries (the Redfish
Employees), (ii) to the knowledge of Redfish,
there is no (and there has not been during the two year period
preceding the date hereof) union organizing effort pending or
threatened against Redfish or any of the Redfish Subsidiaries,
(iii) there is no (and there has not been during the two
year period preceding the date hereof) unfair labor practice,
labor dispute (other than routine individual grievances) or
labor arbitration proceeding pending or, to the knowledge of
Redfish, threatened against Redfish or any of the Redfish
Subsidiaries, (iv) there is no (and there has not been
during the two year period preceding the date hereof) slowdown
or work stoppage in effect or, to the knowledge of Redfish,
threatened with respect to Redfish Employees, and
(v) Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries are in compliance
with all applicable laws respecting employment and employment
practices, terms and conditions of employment and wages and
hours and unfair labor practices. Neither Redfish nor any of the
Redfish Subsidiaries has any liabilities under the Worker
Adjustment and Retraining Act and the regulations promulgated
thereunder (the WARN Act) or any similar
state or local law as a result of any action taken by Redfish
that would have, individually or in the aggregate, a Redfish
Material Adverse Effect. Neither Redfish nor any of the Redfish
Subsidiaries is a party to any collective bargaining agreement.
Except as would not have, individually or in the aggregate, a
Redfish Material Adverse Effect, all individuals that have been
or that are classified by Redfish as independent contractors
have been and are correctly so classified, and none of such
individuals could reasonably be classified as an employee of
Redfish.
Section 3.21 Transactions
with Certain Persons. Except as disclosed in the
Redfish SEC Reports or the MLP SEC Reports or as set forth in
Schedule 3.21, neither Redfish nor any of the
Redfish Subsidiaries is a party to any contract, agreement or
arrangement (other than ordinary course directors
compensation and indemnification arrangements or pursuant to any
Redfish Plan) with any director or officer of Redfish or of the
MLP General Partner, the value of which exceeds $120,000 (each,
an Affiliate Transaction).
A-23
Section 3.22 Material
Contracts.
(a) As of the date of this Agreement, except for
(i) this Agreement, (ii) Redfish Plans,
(iii) contracts filed as an exhibit to or incorporated by
reference in a Redfish SEC Report or MLP SEC Report filed prior
to the date hereof, (iv) contracts related to properties or
operations that have been, or are under contract to be,
purchased or sold or otherwise disposed of or are in the process
of being purchased or sold or otherwise disposed of to the
extent such sales
and/or
dispositions have been disclosed in Redfish SEC Reports or MLP
SEC Reports, or (v) as otherwise set forth on
Schedule 3.22, neither Redfish nor any of the
Redfish Subsidiaries is a party to or bound by any contract
(whether written or oral) that is:
(i) a material contract (as such term is
defined in Item 601(b)(10) of
Regulation S-K
of the SEC);
(ii) a loan, guarantee of indebtedness or credit agreement,
note, bond, mortgage, indenture or other binding commitment
(other than those between Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries)
relating to indebtedness in an amount in excess of
$15 million individually;
(iii) a contract, lease or license (including any seismic
license agreement) (x) pursuant to which Redfish or any of
the Redfish Subsidiaries paid amounts in excess of
$15 million individually within the 12 month period
prior to the date of this Agreement or (y) that is material
to Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries taken as a whole;
(iv) a contract that purports to limit materially the right
of Redfish or any of its affiliates to engage or compete in any
line of business in which Redfish or the Redfish Subsidiaries is
engaged or to compete with any person or operate in any location;
(v) a contract that creates a partnership or joint venture
or similar arrangement with respect to any significant portion
of the business of Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries taken as
a whole; or
(vi) a settlement or similar agreement with any
Governmental Authority or order or consent of a Governmental
Authority involving future performance by Redfish or any of the
Redfish Subsidiaries that is material to Redfish and the Redfish
Subsidiaries taken as a whole.
All contracts of the type described in this Section 3.22(a)
together with the contracts for the sale of Hydrocarbons
produced from any of Redfishs or the Redfish
Subsidiaries properties described in the Redfish Reserve
Reports that are not terminable on 60 days notice and
are set forth on Schedule 3.22, are referred to
herein as the Redfish Material Contracts.
(b) Other than as a result of the expiration or termination
of any Redfish Material Contract in accordance with its terms
and except as would not have, either individually or in the
aggregate, a Redfish Material Adverse Effect, (i) each
Redfish Material Contract is valid and binding on Redfish and
any of the Redfish Subsidiaries that is a party thereto, as
applicable, and is valid and binding on the other party or
parties thereto, and in full force and effect, (ii) Redfish
and each of the Redfish Subsidiaries has in all material
respects performed all obligations required to be performed by
it to date under each Redfish Material Contract, and
(iii) neither Redfish nor any of the Redfish Subsidiaries
has knowledge of, or has received notice of, the existence of
any event or condition which constitutes, or, after notice or
lapse of time or both, would constitute, a material default on
the part of Redfish or of any of the Redfish Subsidiaries or of
any other party under any such Redfish Material Contract.
Section 3.23 Opinion
of Financial Advisor. Barclays Capital Inc. (the
Redfish Financial Advisor) has delivered to
the Redfish Board of Directors its written opinion dated the
date hereof to the effect that, as of the date thereof and based
upon and subject to the matters set forth therein, the Merger
Consideration to be received by Redfish Stockholders pursuant to
the Merger is fair to such stockholders from a financial point
of view. An executed copy of the opinion has been or will
promptly be made available to Dorado.
Section 3.24 Brokers. No
broker, finder or investment banker (other than the Redfish
Financial Advisor) is entitled to any brokerage, finders
or other fee or commission in connection with the transactions
contemplated hereby based upon arrangements made by or on behalf
of Redfish.
A-24
Section 3.25 State
Takeover Laws. Section 203 of the DGCL does
not apply to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated
hereby.
Section 3.26 Rights
Agreement. The Redfish Board of Directors, at a
meeting duly called and held, has approved, for purposes of the
Rights Agreement, the Merger and the acquisition by Dorado of
the shares of Redfish Common Stock pursuant to the Merger.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Redfish has
taken all necessary action so that (x) neither the
execution and delivery of this Agreement nor the consummation of
the Merger or the other transactions contemplated hereby will
(i) cause the rights granted under the Rights Agreement to
become exercisable, (ii) cause Dorado or any affiliate of
Dorado to become an Acquiring Person (as defined in
the Rights Agreement) or (iii) give rise to a
Distribution Date (as defined in the Rights
Agreement) or other triggering event under the Rights Agreement
and (y) the rights granted under the Rights Agreement will
terminate not later than immediately prior to the Effective Time.
Section 3.27 Required
Redfish Stockholder Vote. The affirmative vote of
a majority of the then outstanding shares of Redfish Common
Stock, voting as a single class, is the only vote of any class
or series of Redfish capital stock that is required by
applicable law to adopt and approve this Agreement and the
transactions contemplated hereby, including the Merger (such
vote, the Redfish Stockholder Approval).
ARTICLE IV
Representations
and Warranties of Dorado
Dorado hereby represents and warrants to Redfish that,
(i) except as otherwise set forth in Dorados
Schedules to this Agreement (it being agreed that disclosure of
any item in any section of Dorados Schedules shall also be
deemed to be disclosed with respect to any other section of this
Agreement to which the relevance of such item is reasonably
apparent) or (ii) other than with respect to
Sections 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.7(a), 4.7(b) or 4.9(a),
except as reasonably apparent from the Dorado SEC Reports filed
with the SEC on or after January 1, 2009 and prior to the
date of this Agreement (excluding any disclosures set forth in
any section of a Dorado SEC Report entitled Risk
Factor or Forward-Looking Statements or any
other disclosures included in such filings to the extent that
they are cautionary, predictive or forward-looking in nature):
Section 4.1 Corporate
Organization. Each of Dorado and each subsidiary
of Dorado (each a Dorado Subsidiary and
collectively the Dorado Subsidiaries) has
been duly organized and is validly existing and in good standing
under the laws of the jurisdiction of its incorporation or
formation, as the case may be, and has the requisite corporate
or other power and authority and all necessary governmental
approvals to own, lease and operate its properties and to carry
on its business as it is now being conducted, except where the
failure to be so organized, existing or in good standing or to
have such power, authority and governmental approvals would not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Dorado Material Adverse
Effect. The term Dorado Material Subsidiaries
means those subsidiaries indicated as material on
Schedule 4.1. Except for the Dorado Material Subsidiaries,
no Dorado Subsidiary is material to the business, operations or
financial condition of Dorado or has any material assets or
liabilities.
Section 4.2 Organizational
Documents. Dorado has heretofore furnished to
Redfish a complete and correct copy of the charter and the
bylaws or equivalent organizational documents, each as amended
to date, of Dorado and each Dorado Material Subsidiary. Such
charter and bylaws or equivalent organizational documents are in
full force and effect. Neither Dorado nor any Dorado Material
Subsidiary is in violation of any provision of its charter,
bylaws or equivalent organizational documents.
Section 4.3 Capitalization.
(a) The authorized capital stock of Dorado consists of
600,000,000 shares of Dorado Common Stock and
25,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $.001 per
share (Dorado Preferred Stock). As
of October 30, 2009, (i) 249,822,674 shares of
Dorado Common Stock were issued and outstanding, all of which
were validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable,
(ii) 282,461 shares of Dorado Common Stock were held
in treasury, (iii) 6,223,969 shares of Dorado Common
Stock were reserved for future issuance pursuant to stock
A-25
options granted pursuant to Dorados 2004 Omnibus Stock and
Incentive Plan, and (iv) 4,597,144 shares of Dorado
Common Stock were reserved for issuance pursuant to stock
options granted under Dorados 1995 Stock Option Plan. As
of the date hereof, no shares of Dorado Preferred Stock are
issued and outstanding. Since October 30, 2009 to the date
of this Agreement, except with respect to employees hired since
October 30, 2009, Dorado has not issued any shares of
capital stock or granted any options covering shares of capital
stock, except in connection with the exercise of options
covering shares of Dorado Common Stock issued and outstanding on
October 30, 2009. Except as set forth in this
Section 4.3 or in Schedule 4.3, there are no
options, warrants or other rights, agreements, arrangements or
commitments of any character obligating Dorado or any Dorado
Subsidiary to issue or sell any shares of capital stock of, or
other equity interests in, Dorado or any Dorado Subsidiary. All
shares subject to issuance as aforesaid, upon issuance on the
terms and conditions specified in the instruments pursuant to
which they are issuable, will be duly authorized, validly
issued, fully paid and nonassessable and will not be subject to
any preemptive rights. Except as set forth in
Schedule 4.3, there are no outstanding contractual
obligations of Dorado or any Dorado Subsidiary to repurchase,
redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of capital stock of
Dorado or any Dorado Subsidiary except in connection with the
exercise of options issued and outstanding on the date hereof,
and options to be granted to Dorado employees after the date
hereof as part of Dorados annual incentive compensation
program consistent with past practices or to provide funds to,
or make any investment, (in the form of a loan, capital
contribution or otherwise) in, any Dorado Subsidiary or any
other person. Except as set forth in Schedule 4.3,
all of the outstanding capital stock of, or other ownership
interests in, each Dorado Subsidiary is owned by Dorado,
directly or indirectly, free and clear of all security
interests, liens, claims, pledges, options, rights of first
refusal, agreements, limitations on Dorados or such other
Dorado Subsidiarys voting rights, charges and other
encumbrances of any nature whatsoever, Subject to the foregoing,
there are no options, warrants or other rights, agreements,
arrangements or commitments of any character obligating Dorado
or any Dorado Material Subsidiary to issue or sell any shares of
capital stock of, or other equity interests in, Dorado or any
Dorado Material Subsidiary, and consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement will not effect or result in any
change in the ownership of Dorado or of any Dorado Subsidiary
except as expressly contemplated by this Agreement.
(b) Dorado has sufficient authorized and unissued shares of
Dorado Common Stock to consummate the Merger.
Section 4.4 Authority;
Due Authorization; Binding Agreement; Approval.
(a) Dorado has all requisite corporate power and authority
to enter into this Agreement and to perform its obligations
under this Agreement, subject, with respect to the Merger, to
the Redfish Stockholder Approval under the DGCL.
(b) The execution, delivery and performance of this
Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated
hereby (including the Merger) have been duly and validly
authorized by all requisite corporate or similar action on the
part of Dorado (other than, with respect to the Merger, the
Dorado Stockholder Approval and the filing and recordation of
appropriate merger documents as required by the DGCL).
(c) This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by
each of Dorado and, assuming the due authorization, execution
and delivery hereof by Redfish, constitutes a legal, valid and
binding obligation of Dorado enforceable against Dorado in
accordance with its terms, subject, however, to the effects of
bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and other
similar laws affecting creditors rights generally and to
general principles of equity (regardless of whether such
enforceability is considered in a proceeding in equity or at
law).
(d) The board of directors of Dorado (the Dorado
Board of Directors), at a meeting duly called and
held, has unanimously (i) determined that this Agreement
and the transactions contemplated hereby (including the Merger)
are advisable, (ii) approved and adopted this Agreement and
the transactions contemplated hereby (including the Merger),
(iii) resolved (subject to Section 6.1(f)) to
recommend the adoption of this Agreement (including the Merger)
by the stockholders of Dorado (the Dorado
Stockholders), and (iv) directed that the Merger
be submitted to the Dorado Stockholders for approval, all of
which determinations, approvals and resolutions have not been
rescinded, modified or withdrawn as of the date hereof.
A-26
Section 4.5 No
Violation; Consents.
(a) Except as set forth on Schedule 4.5(a), the
consummation of the Merger will not violate, conflict with or
result in a breach of any provision of, constitute a default (or
an event which, with notice or lapse of time or both, would
constitute a default) under, result in the termination of,
accelerate the performance required by, result in a right of
termination or acceleration under, require any offer to purchase
or any prepayment of any debt or result in the creation of any
lien, security interest or encumbrance upon any of the
properties or assets of Dorado or any of the Dorado Subsidiaries
under any of the terms, conditions or provisions of (i) any
provision of the governing documents of Dorado, (ii) any
provision of any contract or agreement or of any bank loan,
indenture or credit agreement, in each case to which Dorado is a
party, (iii) assuming the governmental filings, approvals,
consents and authorizations referred to in Section 4.5(b)
are duly and timely made or obtained, any applicable law,
ordinance, rule or regulation of any Governmental Authority or
(iv) any applicable order, writ, judgment or decree of any
court or other competent authority, other than, in the case of
(ii), (iii), and (iv) above, for such violations, defaults
or other occurrences which would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Dorado Material Adverse Effect.
(b) Except for (i) any required filings under the HSR
Act, (ii) the filing and recordation of appropriate merger
documents as required by the DGCL or applicable law of other
states in which Dorado is qualified to do business,
(iii) the applicable requirements of (A) the
Securities Act, the Exchange Act and any other applicable
U.S. state or federal securities laws, and (B) the
NYSE, (iv) any governmental authorizations, consents,
approvals or filings necessary for transfers of permits and
licenses or made in connection with the transfer of interests in
or the change of control of ownership in oil and natural gas
properties and (v) such other authorizations, consents,
approvals or filings the failure of which to obtain or make
would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Dorado
Material Adverse Effect or prevent or materially delay
consummation of the Merger, or otherwise prevent Dorado from
performing its obligations under this Agreement, no
authorization, consent or approval of or filing with any
Governmental Authority is required to be obtained or made by
Dorado for the execution and delivery by Dorado of this
Agreement or the consummation by Dorado of the
Merger. No authorization, consent or approval of any
nongovernmental third party is required to be obtained by Dorado
for the execution and delivery by Dorado of this Agreement or
the consummation by Dorado of the transactions contemplated
hereby, including the Merger, except as set forth in
Schedule 4.5(b) or where failure to obtain such
authorizations, consents or approvals would not prevent or
materially delay the consummation of the Merger, or otherwise
prevent Dorado from performing its obligations under this
Agreement, and would not, individually or in the aggregate, have
a Dorado Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.6 Compliance.
(a) Except with respect to employee benefit matters, Tax
matters and Environmental Laws, which are addressed exclusively
in Sections 4.11, 4.14 and 4.15, respectively, or as set
forth in Schedule 4.6, neither Dorado nor any Dorado
Subsidiary is in conflict with, or in default or violation of
any applicable law, rule, regulation, order, judgment or decree
of any Governmental Authority having jurisdiction over it,
except for any such conflicts, defaults or violations that do
not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Dorado Material
Adverse Effect.
(b) None of Dorado, any of the Dorado Subsidiaries, or to
the knowledge of Dorado, any director, officer, agent or
employee acting on behalf of Dorado or of any of the Dorado
Subsidiaries (i) has used any corporate funds for any
unlawful contribution, gift, entertainment or anything of value
relating to political activity; (ii) made any direct or
indirect unlawful payment to any employee, agent, officer,
director, representative or stockholder of a Governmental
Authority or political party, or official or candidate thereof,
or any immediate family member of any of the foregoing; or
(iii) has made any bribe, unlawful rebate, payoff,
influence payment, kickback or other unlawful payment in
connection with the conduct of Dorados or the
Dorados Subsidiaries businesses. None of
Dorado, any of the Dorado Subsidiaries, or to the knowledge of
Dorado, any director, officer, agent or employee of Dorado or
any of the Dorado Subsidiaries has received any bribes,
kickbacks or other improper payments from vendors, suppliers or
other persons. Dorado has no knowledge
A-27
that any payment made to a person would be or has thereafter
been offered, given or provided to any foreign official,
political party or official thereof, or to any candidate for
public office.
Section 4.7 SEC
Filings; Financial Statements; Sarbanes-Oxley; Internal
Accounting Controls; Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
(a) Dorado has filed all forms, reports and documents
required to be filed by it with the SEC since January 1,
2007 (collectively, the Dorado SEC
Reports). The Dorado SEC Reports were
prepared in all material respects in accordance with the
requirements of the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, as the
case may be, and none of the Dorado SEC Reports, as of the date
it was filed with the SEC, contained any untrue statement of a
material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not
misleading. No Dorado Subsidiary is currently required to file
any form, report or other document with the SEC under
Section 12 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
(b) The historical consolidated financial statements
(including any notes thereto) contained in the Dorado SEC
Reports were prepared in accordance with GAAP applied on a
consistent basis throughout the periods indicated (except as may
be indicated in the notes thereto and except that financial
statements included with quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
do not contain all GAAP notes to such financial statements) and
each fairly presented, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position, results of operations, changes
in stockholders equity and cash flows of Dorado and the
consolidated Dorado Subsidiaries as at the respective dates
thereof and for the respective periods indicated therein
(subject, in the case of unaudited statements, to normal and
recurring year-end adjustments).
(c) With respect to each annual report on
Form 10-K
and each quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
included in the Dorado SEC Reports, the chief executive officer
and chief financial officer of Dorado have made all
certifications required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and any
related rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC and the
National Securities Exchange, and the statements contained in
any such certifications are complete and correct.
(d) Dorado maintains a system of internal accounting
controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that
(i) transactions are executed in accordance with
managements general or specific authorizations,
(ii) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with
managements general or specific authorization, and
(iii) the recorded accountability for assets is compared
with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate
action is taken with respect to any differences.
(e) The disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e) of
the Exchange Act) of Dorado are reasonably designed to ensure
that all information (both financial and non-financial) required
to be disclosed by Dorado in the reports that it files or
submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
rules and forms of the SEC, and that all such information is
accumulated and communicated to the management of Dorado as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure and to make the certifications of the chief executive
officer and chief financial officer of Dorado required under the
Exchange Act with respect to such reports.
Section 4.8 Absence
of Undisclosed Liabilities. Except as set forth
in Schedule 4.8 or the Dorado SEC Reports, neither Dorado
nor any of the Dorado Subsidiaries has any liabilities or
obligations (whether absolute, accrued, contingent or otherwise)
of any nature, except (a) liabilities, obligations or
contingencies (i) which are accrued or reserved against in
the consolidated financial statements included in the Dorado SEC
Reports or reflected in the notes thereto or (ii) which
were incurred in the ordinary course of business,
(b) liabilities, obligations or contingencies which
(i) would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a
Dorado Material Adverse Effect, or (ii) have been
discharged or paid in full prior to the date hereof, and
(c) liabilities, obligations and contingencies which are of
a nature not required to be reflected in the consolidated
financial statements (including the notes thereto) of Dorado and
the Dorado Subsidiaries.
A-28
Section 4.9 Absence
of Certain Changes or Events.
(a) Since December 31, 2008, there has not been any
change or event that has had, individually or in the aggregate,
a Dorado Material Adverse Effect.
(b) Except as set forth in Schedule 4.9, from
December 31, 2008 until the date of this Agreement, except
as contemplated by this Agreement, Dorado and the Dorado
Subsidiaries have conducted their respective businesses only in
the ordinary course and there has not been any (a) change
by Dorado in its accounting methods, principles or practices
materially affecting the consolidated assets, liabilities or
results of operations of Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries,
except insofar as may have been required by GAAP, or
(b) declaration, setting aside or payment of any dividend
or distribution in respect of any capital stock of Dorado or any
redemption, purchase or other acquisition of any of its
securities, except in connection with outstanding options.
Section 4.10 Litigation. Except
with respect to employee benefit matters, Tax matters and
Environmental Laws, which are addressed exclusively in
Sections 4.11, 4.14 and 4.15, respectively, or as set forth
on Schedule 4.10, there is no (a) action,
administrative proceeding, lawsuit or governmental inquiry
directed against Dorado or any Dorado Subsidiary pending and
publicly filed, or, to the knowledge of Dorado, threatened,
except for such matters as would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Dorado Material Adverse Effect,
(b) action, administrative proceeding, lawsuit or
governmental inquiry pending and publicly filed or, to the
knowledge of Dorado, threatened against Dorado or any Dorado
Subsidiary that is reasonably likely to materially hinder or
impede the consummation of the Transactions, or
(c) judgment or settlement obligation outstanding that is
directed specifically against Dorado or the Dorado Subsidiaries
that would have the effect referred to in clause (b).
Section 4.11 Employee
Benefit Plans.
(a) Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries and their respective
ERISA Affiliates have complied, and are now in compliance, in
all material respects, with all provisions of ERISA, the Code
and all laws and regulations (including any applicable local
laws) applicable to Dorado Plans sponsored or maintained by
Dorado. Each such Dorado Plan has been operated in
material compliance with its terms and has been maintained, in
all material respects, in compliance with all provisions of
ERISA, the Code and other applicable laws. There is not now, and
there are no existing circumstances that could reasonably be
expected to give rise to, any requirement for the posting of
security with respect to a Dorado Plan or the imposition of any
pledge, lien, security interest or encumbrance on the assets of
Dorado or any of the Dorado Subsidiaries or any of their
respective ERISA Affiliates under ERISA or the Code, or similar
applicable laws of foreign jurisdictions. Neither Dorado nor any
of the Dorado Subsidiaries or their respective ERISA Affiliates,
nor any party in interest or disqualified
person with respect to any Dorado Plan, has engaged in any
nonexempt prohibited transaction within the meaning
of Section 4975 of the Code or Section 406 of ERISA.
(b) Neither Dorado nor any of the Dorado Subsidiaries or
ERISA Affiliates maintains or contributes to any plan that is
(i) covered by Title IV of ERISA, (ii) subject to
the minimum funding requirements of Section 412 of the
Code, (iii) a Multiemployer Plan as defined in
Section 3(37) of ERISA, (iv) a Multiple Employer Plan,
or subject to Section 4063 or 4064 of ERISA, or
(v) funded by a voluntary employees beneficiary
association within the meaning of Code Section 501(c)(9),
nor has Dorado or any of the Dorado Subsidiaries or any of their
respective ERISA Affiliates, at any time within six years before
the date of this Agreement, contributed to or been obligated to
contribute to any Multiemployer Plan or Multiple Employer Plan.
There does not now exist, and there are no existing
circumstances that could reasonably be expected to result in,
any material Controlled Group Liability that would be a
liability of Dorado or any of the Dorado Subsidiaries or any of
their respective ERISA Affiliates following the Closing. Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, neither Dorado nor any
of the Dorado Subsidiaries or ERISA Affiliates has engaged in
any transaction described in Section 4069 or that
constitutes a withdrawal under Section 4201 et seq. of
ERISA.
(c) Except as set forth on Schedule 4.11(c), neither
this Agreement nor the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement will result in any forgiveness of indebtedness or
obligation to fund benefits with respect to any employee,
director, independent contractor, consultant or officer of
Dorado or any Dorado Subsidiary, or result
A-29
in any restriction on the right to merge, amend or terminate any
Dorado Plan, or result in any new or increased contribution
required to be made to any of the Dorado Plans.
(d) Except as disclosed in Schedule 4.11(d),
there is no pending, or, to the knowledge of Dorado, threatened
Action (other than claims for benefits in the ordinary course)
that has been asserted or instituted against any Dorado Plan,
any fiduciaries thereof with respect to their duties to any
Dorado Plan or the assets of any of the trusts under any Dorado
Plan that could reasonably be expected to result in any material
liability of Dorado or any of the Dorado Subsidiaries to any
person, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, the United
States Department of Treasury, the United States Department of
Labor or any Multiemployer Plan, or to comparable entities or
Dorado Plans under applicable laws of jurisdictions outside the
United States, except as would not have a Dorado Material
Adverse Effect.
(e) No Dorado Plan is subject to the laws of any
jurisdiction outside of the United States.
(f) Except as set forth on Schedule 4.11(f), no
disallowance of a deduction under Section 162(m) of the
Code for employee reimbursement of any amount paid or payable by
Dorado or any of the Dorado Subsidiaries has occurred or is
reasonably expected to occur. All Dorado Plans that are subject
to Section 409A of the Code are in material compliance with
the requirements of such Code Section and regulations thereunder.
Section 4.12 Information
Supplied.
(a) The Registration Statement will not, at the time the
Registration Statement and each amendment or supplement thereto,
if any, becomes effective under the Securities Act, contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they are made, not
misleading. The information supplied or to be
supplied by Dorado for inclusion or incorporation by reference
in the Joint Proxy Statement will not, at the time the Joint
Proxy Statement is first published, sent or given to Redfish
Stockholders and Dorado Stockholders, contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact
required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the
statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which
they are made, not misleading and will not, at the time of the
Redfish Stockholders Meeting or at the time of the Dorado
Stockholders Meeting, omit to state any material fact necessary
to correct any statement in any earlier communication with
respect to the solicitation of proxies for the Redfish
Stockholders Meeting or the Dorado Stockholders Meeting that
shall have become false or misleading in any material respect.
(b) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this
Section 4.12, no representation or warranty is made by
Dorado with respect to statements made or incorporated by
reference in the Registration Statement or the Joint Proxy
Statement based on information supplied by or on behalf of
Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries for inclusion or
incorporation by reference therein or based on information which
is not made in or incorporated by reference in such documents
but which should have been disclosed pursuant to
Section 3.12.
Section 4.13 Properties,
Oil and Gas Matters.
(a) For purposes of this Agreement, Dorado Oil and
Gas Agreements means the following types of agreements
or contracts to which Dorado or any of the Dorado Subsidiaries
is a party, whether as an original party, by succession or
assignment or otherwise: oil and gas leases, farm-in and
farm-out agreements, agreements providing for an overriding
royalty interest, agreements providing for a royalty interest,
agreements providing for a net profits interest, crude oil or
natural gas sales or purchase contracts, joint operating
agreements, unit operating agreements, unit agreements, field
equipment leases, and agreements restricting Dorado or any of
the Dorado Subsidiaries ability to operate, obtain,
explore for or develop interests in a particular geographic
area. Set forth in Schedule 4.13 is a
list of all Dorado Oil and Gas Agreements that contain
restrictions on Dorados or any of the Dorado
Subsidiaries ability to operate, obtain, explore for or
develop interests in a particular geographic area that would
reasonably be expected to have a Dorado Material Adverse Effect.
A-30
(b) Dorado has furnished to Redfish separate reserve
reports prepared by DeGolyer & MacNaughton Engineering
containing estimates of the oil and gas reserves that are owned
by Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries as of December 31,
2008, together with internal reserve reports prepared by Dorado
as of a subsequent date (the Dorado Reserve
Reports). The factual, non-interpretive data relating
to the Oil and Gas Properties of Dorado and the Dorado
Subsidiaries on which the Dorado Reserve Reports were based for
purposes of estimating the oil and gas reserves set forth
therein, to the knowledge of Dorado, were accurate in all
material respects at the time such data was provided to the
reserve engineers. With respect to the proved reserves reflected
in the Dorado Reserve Reports, the Dorado Reserve Reports
conform in all material respects to the guidelines with respect
thereto of the SEC. Except for changes (including changes in
Hydrocarbon commodity prices) generally affecting the oil and
gas industry and normal depletion by production, there has been
no change in respect of the matters addressed in the Dorado
Reserve Reports that would reasonably be expected to have a
Dorado Material Adverse Effect.
(c) All major items of operating equipment owned or leased
by Dorado or the Dorado Subsidiaries are in a state of repair so
as to be adequate for reasonably prudent operations in the areas
in which they are operated, except as would not, individually or
in the aggregate, have a Dorado Material Adverse Effect.
(d) Except for goods and other property sold, used or
otherwise disposed of since the dates of the Dorado Reserve
Reports in the ordinary course of business or reflected as
having been sold, used or otherwise disposed of in the Dorado
SEC Reports, as of the date hereof, Dorado and the Dorado
Subsidiaries own or have valid leases or contractual rights to,
all equipment and other personal property used or necessary for
use in the operation of its Oil and Gas Properties in the manner
in which such properties were operated as of the date hereof.
(e) Except for property sold or otherwise disposed of since
the dates of the respective Dorado Reserve Reports in the
ordinary course of business or reflected as having been sold or
otherwise disposed of in the Dorado SEC Reports, Dorado and the
Dorado Subsidiaries have good and defensible title to all Oil
and Gas Properties forming the basis for the reserves reflected
in the Dorado Reserve Reports, in each case relating to the
interests referred to therein as of the date of each such
report, and in each case as attributable to interests owned by
Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries, free and clear of any liens,
except: (a) liens reflected in the Dorado Reserve Reports
or in the Dorado SEC Reports filed prior to the date of this
Agreement, (b) Permitted Encumbrances, and (c) such
imperfections of title, easements, liens, government or tribal
approvals or other matters and failures of title as would not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Dorado Material Adverse
Effect.
(f) Except as would not have a Dorado Material Adverse
Effect, all material proceeds from the sale of Hydrocarbons
produced from the Oil and Gas Properties of Dorado and the
Dorado Subsidiaries are being received by them in a timely
manner and are not being held in suspense for any reason.
(g) The Dorado Oil and Gas Agreements affecting any real or
personal property given value in the Dorado Reserve Reports,
including the Oil and Gas Properties, are in good standing,
valid and effective, and the rentals due by Dorado or any of the
Dorado Subsidiaries to any lessor of any such oil and gas leases
have been properly paid, except in each case as would not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Dorado Material Adverse
Effect. Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries have paid all
royalties, overriding royalties and other burdens on production
due by Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries with respect to their
Oil and Gas Properties, except for any nonpayments that
individually or in the aggregate would not be reasonably likely
to have a Dorado Material Adverse Effect.
(h) Except as would not have a Dorado Material Adverse
Effect, all Oil and Gas Properties operated by Dorado or the
Dorado Subsidiaries have been operated in all material respects
in accordance with reasonable, prudent oil and gas field
practices and in compliance with the applicable oil and gas
leases and applicable law.
(i) Neither Dorado nor any of the Dorado Subsidiaries has
produced Hydrocarbons from its Oil and Gas Properties in excess
of regulatory allowables or other applicable legal limits on
production that could reasonably be expected to result in
curtailment of production from any such property, except any
such excess production which, individually or in the aggregate,
would not have a Dorado Material Adverse Effect.
A-31
(j) Except as set forth in Schedule 4.13(j),
none of the material Oil and Gas Properties of Dorado or of any
of the Dorado Subsidiaries is subject to any preferential
purchase, consent or similar right that would become operative
as a result of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(k) Except as set forth in Schedule 4.13(k),
none of the Oil and Gas Properties of Dorado or of any of the
Dorado Subsidiaries are subject to any tax partnership agreement
or provisions requiring a partnership income tax return to be
filed under Subchapter K of Chapter 1 of Subtitle A of the
Code.
(l) Neither Dorado nor any of the Dorado Subsidiaries has
received any material advance, take-or-pay or other similar
payments that entitle purchasers of production to receive
deliveries of Hydrocarbons without paying therefor, and, on a
net, Dorado-wide basis, Dorado is neither underproduced nor
overproduced, in either case, to any material extent, under gas
balancing or similar arrangements, except as set forth in
Schedule 4.13(l).
Section 4.14 Taxes.
(a) (i) Each of Dorado, the Dorado Subsidiaries and
any affiliated, combined or unitary group of which any such
entity is or was a member has timely (taking into account any
extensions) filed all Returns required to be filed in respect of
any Tax that is imposed by the United States, has filed all
state and local Returns in respect of a Tax that is material,
and has timely paid all Taxes that are shown by such Returns to
be due and payable, and (ii) each of Dorado and the Dorado
Subsidiaries has established reserves that are adequate in the
aggregate for the payment of all Taxes not yet due and payable
with respect to the results of operations of Dorado and the
Dorado Subsidiaries through the date of this Agreement, and has
complied in all material respects with all applicable laws,
rules and regulations relating to the payment and withholding of
Taxes, except in each case where the failure to file such
Returns or pay such Tax or the failure to comply in all respects
with all applicable laws, rules and regulations relating to the
payment and withholding of Taxes that would not have a Dorado
Material Adverse Effect.
(b) Except as set forth in Schedule 4.14(b), no
federal income Tax Return of Dorado or the Dorado Subsidiaries
is currently subject to examination by the
IRS. Except as set forth in
Schedule 4.14(b), no federal, state or local income
or franchise tax audit or other administrative proceeding or
court proceeding is presently pending with regard to any
material amount of Tax for which Dorado or any of the Dorado
Subsidiaries would be liable, and no material deficiency which
has not yet been paid for any such Tax has been proposed,
asserted or assessed against Dorado or any of the Dorado
Subsidiaries with respect to any period.
Schedule 4.14(b) sets forth the last taxable period
through which the federal income Tax Returns of Dorado and the
Dorado Subsidiaries have been examined by the IRS or otherwise
closed.
(c) Except as set forth in Schedule 4.14(c),
neither Dorado nor any of the Dorado Subsidiaries has executed
or entered into (or prior to the close of business on the
Closing Date will execute or enter into) with the IRS or any
taxing authority (i) any agreement or other document
extending or having the effect of extending the period for
assessment or collection of any Tax for which Dorado or any of
the Dorado Subsidiaries would be liable or (ii) a closing
agreement pursuant to Section 7121 of the Code or any
similar provision of state or local income tax law that relates
to Dorado or any of the Dorado Subsidiaries.
(d) Neither Dorado nor any of the Dorado Subsidiaries is a
party to, is bound by or has any obligation under any tax
sharing agreement or similar agreement or arrangement other than
any such agreement or arrangement all the other parties to which
are directly or indirectly wholly owned by Dorado.
(e) Dorado has not been a distributing
corporation and is not a controlled
corporation, in either case, with respect to a
distribution that was purported or intended to be governed by
Section 355 of the Code and that occurred after the date
that is two years before the date of this Agreement and will not
be a distributing corporation with respect to a
distribution that is to occur hereafter and that is part of a
plan or series of related transactions
within the meaning of Section 355(e) of the Code, of which
the Merger is a part.
(f) Neither Dorado nor any of the Dorado Subsidiaries has
taken or agreed to take any action or knows of any fact,
agreement, plan or other circumstance that would be reasonably
likely to prevent the Merger from qualifying as a reorganization
within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(A) of the Code.
A-32
(g) Except as set forth in Schedule 4.14(g),
neither Dorado nor any of the Dorado Subsidiaries is the subject
of or bound by any private letter ruling, technical advice
memorandum, closing agreement, or similar ruling, memorandum or
agreement with any taxing authority.
(h) Neither Dorado nor any of the Dorado Subsidiaries has
been a member of any affiliated group (as defined in
Section 1504(a) of the Code) or has been included in any
consolidated unitary or
combined Tax Return (other than returns that include
only Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries) provided for under any
laws of the United States, any foreign jurisdiction, or any
state or locality and the none of Dorado nor any of the Dorado
Subsidiaries has any liability for the Taxes of any person
(other than Dorado or any of the Dorado Subsidiaries) under
Treasury
Regulation Section 1.1502-6
or any similar provision under any state, local or foreign law,
or as a successor or a transferee.
(i) Except as set forth in Schedule 4.14(i),
neither Dorado nor any of the Dorado Subsidiaries has made or
agreed to make, and is not required to make, any change in
method of accounting previously used by it in any Tax Return
filed by Dorado or any of the Dorado Subsidiaries which change
in method would require Dorado or any of the Dorado Subsidiaries
to make an adjustment to its income pursuant to
Section 481(a) of the Code (or any similar provision) on
any Tax Return for any taxable period for which Dorado or any of
the Dorado Subsidiaries has not yet filed a Tax Return; and
neither is there any application pending with any Governmental
Authority requesting permission for Dorado or any of the Dorado
Subsidiaries to make any change in any accounting method, nor
has Dorado or any of the Dorado Subsidiaries received any notice
that a Governmental Authority proposes to require a change in
method of accounting used in any Tax Return which has been filed
by Dorado or any of the Dorado Subsidiaries.
(j) Except as set forth in Schedule 4.14(j),
neither Dorado nor any of the Dorado Subsidiaries has been a
beneficiary or has otherwise participated in any
reportable transaction within the meaning of
Treasury
Regulation Section 1.6011-4(b)(1)
that was, is, or to Dorados knowledge will ever be
required to be disclosed under Treasury
Regulation Section 1.6011-4.
No Tax Return filed by or on behalf of Dorado or any of the
Dorado Subsidiaries has contained a disclosure statement under
Section 6662 of the Code (or any similar legal requirement).
(k) Except as set forth in Schedule 4.14(k),
neither Dorado nor any of the Dorado Subsidiaries has received
written notification from a Governmental Authority in a
jurisdiction where Dorado or the Dorado Subsidiaries do not file
Tax Returns that any of them are or may be subject to taxation
by that jurisdiction. Neither Dorado nor any of the Dorado
Subsidiaries has commenced activities in any jurisdiction which
would reasonably be expected to require Dorado or any of the
Dorado Subsidiaries to make an initial filing of any Tax Return
with respect to Taxes imposed by a Governmental Authority that
it had not previously been required to file in the immediately
preceding taxable period.
Section 4.15 Environmental
Matters. Except as set forth in
Schedule 4.15:
(a) Each of Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries and their
respective properties is in compliance with all applicable
Environmental Laws, except for such instances of noncompliance
that, individually or in the aggregate, would not have a Dorado
Material Adverse Effect.
(b) Each of Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries has obtained
all material permits, licenses, franchise authorities, consents
and approvals, made all material filings and maintained all
material data, documentation and records necessary for owning
and operating its assets and business as it is presently
conducted under all applicable Environmental Laws, and all such
permits, licenses, franchises, authorities, consents, approvals
and filings remain in full force and effect, except for such
matters that, individually or in the aggregate, would not have a
Dorado Material Adverse Effect.
(c) There are no pending or, to the knowledge of Dorado,
threatened claims, demands, actions, administrative proceedings,
lawsuits or investigations against Dorado or any of the Dorado
Subsidiaries or affecting any of their respective properties
under any Environmental Laws that, individually or in the
aggregate, would have a Dorado Material Adverse Effect.
A-33
(d) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained
elsewhere in this Agreement, Dorado makes no representation in
this Agreement regarding any compliance or failure to comply
with, or any actual or contingent liability under, or claims,
demands, actions, proceedings, lawsuits or investigations with
respect to any Environmental Law, except as set forth in this
Section 4.15.
Section 4.16 Dorado
Intellectual Property. Except as would not have a
Dorado Material Adverse Effect:
(a) Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries own, or are licensed
to use, all patents, patent rights (including patent
applications and licenses), know-how, trade secrets, trademarks
(including trademark applications), trademark rights, trade
names, trade name rights, service marks, service mark rights,
copyrights and other proprietary intellectual property rights
(collectively, Dorado Intellectual Property)
used in and necessary for the conduct of their business as it is
currently conducted.
(b) To the knowledge of Dorado, the use of Dorado
Intellectual Property by Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries does
not infringe on or otherwise violate the rights of any third
party, and is in accordance in all material respects with the
applicable license pursuant to which Dorado or the Dorado
Subsidiaries acquired the right to use such Dorado Intellectual
Property.
(c) To the knowledge of Dorado, no third party is
challenging, infringing on or otherwise violating any right of
Dorado or the Dorado Subsidiaries in the Dorado Intellectual
Property.
(d) Neither Dorado nor any of the Dorado Subsidiaries has
received any written notice of any pending claim, order or
proceeding with respect to any material Dorado Intellectual
Property used in and necessary for the conduct of Dorados
business as it is currently conducted.
Section 4.17 Derivative
Transactions and
Hedging. Schedule 4.17 contains a
complete and correct list as of October 30, 2009 of all
outstanding commodity or financial hedging positions entered
into by Dorado or any of the Dorado Subsidiaries or for the
account of any of its customers as of the date of this Agreement
pursuant to which such party has outstanding rights or
obligations. All such Derivative Transactions were, and any
Derivative Transactions entered into after the date of this
Agreement will be, entered into in accordance with applicable
laws, and in accordance with the investment, securities,
commodities, risk management and other policies, practices and
procedures employed by Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries, and
were, and will be, entered into with counterparties believed at
the time and currently to be financially responsible. Dorado and
each of the Dorado Subsidiaries have, and will have, duly
performed all of their respective obligations under the
Derivative Transactions to the extent that such obligations to
perform have accrued, and, to the knowledge of Dorado, there are
and will be no breaches, violations, collateral deficiencies,
requests for collateral or demands for payment, or defaults or
allegations or assertions thereof by any party thereunder,
except as would not have a Dorado Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.18 FERC
Jurisdiction. Except as set forth in
Schedule 4.18, any gas gathering system constituting
a part of the properties of Dorado or the Dorado Subsidiaries
and material to the operations of Dorado and the Dorado
Subsidiaries considered as a single enterprise has as its
primary function the provision of natural gas gathering
services, as the term gathering is interpreted by
the FERC under Section 1(b) of the NGA; none of the
properties has been or is certificated by the FERC under
Section 7(c) of the NGA or to the knowledge of Dorado is
now subject to FERC jurisdiction under the NGA; and none of the
properties has been or is providing service pursuant to
Section 311 of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978.
Section 4.19 Insurance. Each
of Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries maintain insurance with
financially responsible insurers in such amounts with such
deductibles and covering such risks and losses as are in
accordance with normal industry practice for companies engaged
in similar businesses. Copies of all material insurance policies
maintained by Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries and all
material financial agreements between insurance companies, on
the one hand, and Dorado and any of the Dorado Subsidiaries, on
the other hand, have been made available to Redfish. Except as
would not have a Dorado Material Adverse Effect, all such
insurance policies are in full force and effect, all premiums
due and payable thereunder have been paid and none of Dorado or
any of the Dorado Subsidiaries is in material default
thereunder. Neither Dorado nor any of the Dorado Subsidiaries
has received any written or, to the knowledge of Dorado, oral
A-34
notice of cancellation or termination with respect to any such
insurance policy of Dorado or any of the Dorado Subsidiaries. To
the knowledge of Dorado, there is no material claim pending
under any such policy as to which coverage has been denied or
disputed.
Section 4.20 Labor
Matters. Except for such matters that would not
have, individually or in the aggregate, a Dorado Material
Adverse Effect, neither Dorado nor any of the Dorado
Subsidiaries has received written notice during the past two
years of the intent of any Governmental Authority responsible
for the enforcement of labor, employment, occupational health
and safety or workplace safety and insurance/workers
compensation laws to conduct an investigation of Dorado or any
of the Dorado Subsidiaries and, to the knowledge of Dorado, no
such investigation is in progress. Except for such matters that
would not have, individually or in the aggregate, a Dorado
Material Adverse Effect, (i) there are no (and there have
not been during the two year period preceding the date hereof)
strikes or lockouts with respect to any employees of Dorado or
any of the Dorado Subsidiaries (the Dorado
Employees), (ii) to the knowledge of Dorado,
there is no (and there has not been during the two year period
preceding the date hereof) union organizing effort pending or
threatened against Dorado or any of the Dorado Subsidiaries,
(iii) there is no (and there has not been during the two
year period preceding the date hereof) unfair labor practice,
labor dispute (other than routine individual grievances) or
labor arbitration proceeding pending or, to the knowledge of
Dorado, threatened against Dorado or any of the Dorado
Subsidiaries, (iv) there is no (and there has not been
during the two year period preceding the date hereof) slowdown
or work stoppage in effect or, to the knowledge of Dorado,
threatened with respect to Dorado Employees, and (v) Dorado
and the Dorado Subsidiaries are in compliance with all
applicable laws respecting employment and employment practices,
terms and conditions of employment and wages and hours and
unfair labor practices. Neither Dorado nor any of the Dorado
Subsidiaries has any liabilities under the WARN Act or any
similar state or local law as a result of any action taken by
Dorado that would have, individually or in the aggregate, a
Dorado Material Adverse Effect. Neither Dorado nor any of the
Dorado Subsidiaries is a party to any collective bargaining
agreement. Except as would not have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Dorado Material Adverse Effect, all individuals
that have been or that are classified by Dorado as independent
contractors have been and are correctly so classified, and none
of such individuals could reasonably be classified as an
employee of Dorado.
Section 4.21 Transactions
with Certain Persons. Except as disclosed in the
Dorado SEC Reports or as set forth in Schedule 4.21,
neither Dorado nor any of the Dorado Subsidiaries is a party to
any contract, agreement or arrangement (other than ordinary
course directors compensation and indemnification
arrangements or pursuant to any Dorado Plan) with any director
or officer of Dorado, the value of which exceeds $120,000.
Section 4.22 Material
Contracts.
(a) As of the date of this Agreement, except for
(i) this Agreement, (ii) Dorado Plans,
(iii) contracts filed as an exhibit to or incorporated by
reference in a Dorado SEC Report filed prior to the date hereof,
(iv) contracts related to properties or operations that
have been, or are under contract to be, purchased or sold or
otherwise disposed of or are in the process of being purchased
or sold or otherwise disposed of to the extent such sales
and/or
dispositions have been disclosed in Dorado SEC Reports, or
(v) as otherwise set forth on Schedule 4.22,
neither Dorado nor any of the Dorado Subsidiaries is a party to
or bound by any contract (whether written or oral) that is:
(i) a material contract (as such term is
defined in Item 601(b)(10) of
Regulation S-K
of the SEC);
(ii) a loan, guarantee of indebtedness or credit agreement,
note, bond, mortgage, indenture or other binding commitment
(other than those between Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries)
relating to indebtedness in an amount in excess of
$15 million individually;
(iii) a contract, lease or license (including any seismic
license agreement) (x) pursuant to which Dorado or any of
the Dorado Subsidiaries paid amounts in excess of
$15 million individually within the 12 month period
prior to the date of this Agreement or (y) that is material
to Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries taken as a whole;
A-35
(iv) a contract that purports to limit materially the right
of Dorado or any of its affiliates to engage or compete in any
line of business in which Dorado or the Dorado Subsidiaries is
engaged or to compete with any person or operate in any location;
(v) a contract that creates a partnership or joint venture
or similar arrangement with respect to any significant portion
of the business of Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries taken as a
whole; or
(vi) a settlement or similar agreement with any
Governmental Authority or order or consent of a Governmental
Authority involving future performance by Dorado or any of the
Dorado Subsidiaries that is material to Dorado and the Dorado
Subsidiaries taken as a whole.
All contracts of the type described in this Section 4.22(a)
together with the contracts for the sale of Hydrocarbons
produced from any of Dorados or the Dorado
Subsidiaries properties described in the Dorado Reserve
Reports that are not terminable on 60 days notice and
are set forth on Schedule 4.22, are referred to herein as
the Dorado Material Contracts.
(b) Other than as a result of the expiration or termination
of any Dorado Material Contract in accordance with its terms and
except as would not have, either individually or in the
aggregate, a Dorado Material Adverse Effect, (i) each
Dorado Material Contract is valid and binding on Dorado and any
of the Dorado Subsidiaries that is a party thereto, as
applicable, and is valid and binding on the other party or
parties thereto, and in full force and effect, (ii) Dorado
and each of the Dorado Subsidiaries has in all material respects
performed all obligations required to be performed by it to date
under each Dorado Material Contract, and (iii) neither
Dorado nor any of the Dorado Subsidiaries has knowledge of, or
has received notice of, the existence of any event or condition
which constitutes, or, after notice or lapse of time or both,
would constitute, a material default on the part of Dorado or of
any of the Dorado Subsidiaries or of any other party under any
such Dorado Material Contract.
Section 4.23 Opinion
of Financial Advisor. J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
(the Dorado Financial Advisor) has delivered
to the Dorado Board of Directors its written opinion dated the
date hereof to the effect that, as of the date thereof and based
upon and subject to the matters set forth therein, the Merger
Consideration to be paid by Dorado in the proposed Merger is
fair, from a financial point of view, to Dorado. An executed
copy of the opinion has been or will promptly be made available
to Redfish.
Section 4.24 Brokers. No
broker, finder or investment banker (other than the Dorado
Financial Advisor) is entitled to any brokerage, finders
or other fee or commission in connection with the transactions
contemplated hereby based upon arrangements made by or on behalf
of Dorado.
Section 4.25 Required
Dorado Stockholder Vote. The affirmative vote of
a majority of the then outstanding shares of Dorado Common Stock
is the only vote of the holders of any class or series of Dorado
capital stock necessary to adopt and approve this Agreement and
the transactions contemplated hereby (including the Merger)
(such vote, the Dorado Stockholder Approval),
and no other vote of the holders of any class or series of
Dorado capital stock or other Dorado securities is necessary to
approve this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby,
including the Merger.
Section 4.26 Ownership
of Shares of Redfish Common Stock. Neither Dorado
nor any other Dorado Subsidiary beneficially owns any shares of
Redfish Common Stock or any other security of Redfish.
Section 4.27 Financing. Prior
to the date of this Agreement, Dorado has received and delivered
to Redfish a true and complete copy of the commitment letter
from J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. (the Financing Sources) that relates to
the provision of all of the financing for immediately available
cash funds (the Funds) sufficient, together
with cash on hand of Dorado, (i) to pay the cash portion of
the Merger Consideration and (ii) for any other amounts
payable by Dorado under this Agreement (such commitment letter,
together with all agreements, arrangements or undertakings
related thereto and all schedules, annexes, exhibits or other
attachments thereto (except that amounts of fees payable under
documents relating solely to fee arrangements in connection
therewith may be redacted) collectively, the Commitment
Letter). The Commitment Letter has not been amended or
modified, no such amendment or modification is contemplated, and
the commitment contained in the Commitment Letter has not been
A-36
withdrawn or rescinded in any respect. Dorado has fully paid any
and all commitment fees or other fees in connection with the
Commitment Letter that are payable on or prior to the date
hereof. The Commitment Letter is in full force and effect and is
the legal, valid and binding obligation of Dorado and does not
restrict any transfer of funds from Dorado in connection with
the Merger or other matters contemplated by this Agreement.
There are no conditions precedent or other contingencies related
to advances under the Commitment Letter, other than as
explicitly set forth in the Commitment Letter. No event has
occurred that, with or without notice, lapse of time, or both,
would constitute a default on the part of Dorado under the
Commitment Letter. Dorado and its affiliates (as applicable) are
in a position to satisfy timely all conditions to be satisfied
by them to advances under the Commitment Letter, and Dorado has
no reason to believe that any conditions to advances
contemplated by the Commitment Letter will not be satisfied or
that such advances will not be made to Dorado at the times set
forth in this Agreement in order to satisfy Dorados
obligations herein. Subject to Dorados receipt thereof on
or before the Closing Date, on the Closing Date, the aggregate
proceeds of the financings provided for in the Commitment
Letter, together with available funds (in cash or cash
equivalents) of Dorado (details in respect of which have been
delivered by Dorado to Redfish prior to the date of this
Agreement), would equal or exceed the amount of the Funds.
ARTICLE V
Conduct Of
Business
Section 5.1 Redfish
Conduct of Business. Redfish covenants and agrees
that, between the date of this Agreement and the Effective Time,
unless Dorado shall otherwise agree in writing, which consent
may not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned, and
except for transactions between or among Redfish and the Redfish
Subsidiaries, the businesses of Redfish and the Redfish
Subsidiaries shall be conducted only in, and Redfish and the
Redfish Subsidiaries shall not take any action, except in
(i) the ordinary course of business and in a manner
consistent with past practice in all material respects or
(ii) a manner as contemplated by this Agreement or by the
schedules hereto; and Redfish shall use its commercially
reasonable efforts to preserve substantially intact the business
organization of Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries, to keep
available the services of the current officers, employees and
consultants of Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries and to
preserve the current relationships of Redfish and the Redfish
Subsidiaries with customers, suppliers and other persons with
which Redfish or any Redfish Subsidiary has significant business
relations. Except as contemplated or permitted by this Agreement
or as set forth in Schedule 5.1, or to the extent
that Dorado shall otherwise consent in writing, which consent
may not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned,
neither Redfish nor any Redfish Subsidiary shall, between the
date of this Agreement and the Effective Time, directly or
indirectly do, or propose to do, any of the following without
the prior written consent of Dorado:
(a) except to the extent required to comply with applicable
law, amend or otherwise change, or waive any provision of, its
certificate of incorporation or bylaws or equivalent
organizational documents or amend or otherwise change, or waive
any provision of, the Rights Agreement;
(b) issue, sell, register for sale, pledge, dispose of,
grant, encumber or authorize the issuance, sale, registration,
pledge, disposition, grant or encumbrance of (i) any shares
of capital stock of any class of Redfish or any Redfish
Subsidiary, or any options, warrants, convertible securities or
other rights of any kind to acquire any shares of such capital
stock, or any other ownership interest (including, without
limitation, any phantom interest), of Redfish or any Redfish
Subsidiary (except for the issuance of shares of Redfish Common
Stock issuable pursuant to Options outstanding on the date of
this Agreement) or (ii) any material assets or properties
of Redfish or any Redfish Subsidiary, except (A) in the
ordinary course of business and in a manner consistent with past
practice or (B) pledges of assets and properties required
by any financing document to which Redfish or a Redfish
Subsidiary is a party on the date hereof, as that document is in
effect on the date hereof;
(c) declare, set aside, make or pay any dividend or other
distribution, payable in cash, stock, property or otherwise,
with respect to any of its capital stock (except for such
declarations, set-asides, dividends and other distributions made
to or from any Redfish Subsidiary to Redfish and except for MLP
regular quarterly distributions declared, set aside or paid in
the ordinary course of business);
A-37
(d) reclassify, combine, split or subdivide, or redeem,
purchase or otherwise acquire, directly or indirectly, any of
its capital stock, except in connection with (i) the
exercise of Options, (ii) the withholding of shares upon
the vesting of restricted stock to satisfy income tax
withholding requirements, (iii) the expiration of Redfish
Rights as contemplated by Section 6.13, or
(iv) transactions between Redfish and its wholly owned
subsidiaries and transactions among Redfishs wholly owned
subsidiaries;
(e) (i) acquire (including, without limitation, by
merger, consolidation or acquisition of stock or assets) any
corporation, partnership or other business organization or any
division thereof or any material amount of assets, other than
acquisitions for consideration of not more than $15,000,000 in
the aggregate; (ii) incur any indebtedness for borrowed
money or issue any debt securities or assume, guarantee or
endorse, or otherwise as an accommodation become responsible
for, the obligations of any person (other than obligations of
Redfish or of any of the Redfish Subsidiaries), or make any
loans or advances, except (A) in the ordinary course of
business and in a manner consistent with past practice,
(B) borrowings to refinance existing indebtedness or
(C) borrowings to finance any acquisitions permitted by the
terms of this Section 5.1; or (iii) enter into or
amend any contract, agreement, commitment or arrangement with
respect to any matter set forth in this paragraph (e);
(f) (i) increase materially the compensation payable
or to become payable to, or grant any severance or termination
pay to, any officer or employee, except in accordance with past
practice or pursuant to contractual arrangements existing on the
date hereof or Redfishs Employee Severance Protection Plan
as in effect on the date hereof (the Employee Severance
Protection Plan); (ii) enter into or amend any
employment or severance agreement with, any director, officer or
other employee of Redfish or any Redfish Subsidiary, except
(A) in the ordinary course of business and in a manner
consistent with past practice; (B) as required pursuant to
existing contractual arrangements or policies; or (C) as
required by applicable law, or (iii) establish, adopt,
enter into or amend any collective bargaining, bonus, profit
sharing, thrift, compensation, stock option, restricted stock,
pension, retirement, deferred compensation, employment,
termination, severance or other plan, agreement, trust, fund,
policy or arrangement for the benefit of any director, officer
or employee, except (A) in the ordinary course of business
and in a manner consistent with past practice, (B) as
required pursuant to existing contractual arrangements or
policies or as provided for in this Agreement or (C) as
required by applicable law;
(g) pay, discharge, settle or satisfy any material
litigation, arbitration, proceeding, claim, liability or
obligation (absolute or accrued, asserted or unasserted,
contingent or otherwise), other than the settlement, payment,
discharge or satisfaction in the ordinary course of business and
not exceeding the amount reserved against in the financial
statements contained in the Redfish SEC Reports, where the
amounts paid or to be paid are fully covered by insurance
maintained by Redfish or in an amount less than $10 million
in the aggregate;
(h) agree to take in writing, or otherwise, any of the
actions described in paragraphs (a) through (g) of
this Section 5.1 or any action which would result in any of
the conditions to the Merger not being satisfied (other than as
contemplated by this Agreement);
(i) Redfish shall not, and shall not permit any of the
Redfish Subsidiaries to, make any capital expenditures in any
fiscal quarter exceeding its capital expenditure budget (a copy
of which is attached as Schedule 5.1(i)) for such
fiscal quarter by more than $25 million;
(j) Redfish shall not, and shall not permit any of the
Redfish Subsidiaries to, purchase, sell, transfer, assign,
farm-out, mortgage, encumber or otherwise dispose of any
properties or assets having a value in excess of
$25 million in the aggregate;
(k) Redfish shall not, and shall not permit any of the
Redfish Subsidiaries to, enter into any Derivative Transactions
which would result in more than 70% of Redfishs oil
production or more than 70% of Redfishs natural gas
production being hedged beyond the year ending December 31,
2011;
(l) Redfish shall not, and shall not permit any of the
Redfish Subsidiaries to, enter into, renew, extend, materially
amend or terminate any Redfish Material Contract or Contracts if
the amount involved exceeds $15 million in the aggregate;
A-38
(m) Redfish shall not, and shall not permit any of the
Redfish Subsidiaries to, change its methods of accounting (other
than Tax accounting, which shall be governed by clause (n)
below), except in accordance with changes in GAAP as concurred
in by Redfishs independent auditors;
(n) Redfish shall not, and shall not permit any of the
Redfish Subsidiaries to, enter into any closing agreement with
respect to material Taxes, settle or compromise any material
liability for Taxes, make, revoke or change any material Tax
election, agree to any adjustment of any material Tax attribute,
file or surrender any claim for a material refund of Taxes,
execute or consent to any waiver extending the statutory period
of limitations with respect to the collection or assessment of
material Taxes, file any material amended Tax Return or obtain
any material Tax ruling; or
(o) Redfish shall not, and shall not permit any of the
Redfish Subsidiaries to, enter into any new, or amend or
otherwise alter any Affiliate Transaction or transaction that
would be an Affiliate Transaction if such transaction occurred
prior to the date hereof.
Section 5.2 Dorado
Conduct of Business. Dorado covenants and agrees
that, between the date of this Agreement and the Effective Time,
unless Redfish shall otherwise agree in writing, which consent
may not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned, and
except for transactions between or among Dorado and the Dorado
Subsidiaries, the businesses of Dorado and the Dorado
Subsidiaries shall be conducted only in, and Dorado and the
Dorado Subsidiaries shall not take any action, except in
(i) the ordinary course of business and in a manner
consistent with past practice in all material respects or
(ii) a manner as contemplated by this Agreement or by
Schedule 5.2 hereto; and Dorado shall use its
commercially reasonable efforts to preserve substantially intact
the business organization of Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries,
to keep available the services of the current officers,
employees and consultants of Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries
and to preserve the current relationships of Dorado and the
Dorado Subsidiaries with customers, suppliers and other persons
with which Dorado or any Dorado Subsidiary has significant
business relations. Except as contemplated or permitted by this
Agreement or as set forth in Schedule 5.2, or to the
extent that Redfish shall otherwise consent in writing, which
consent may not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or
conditioned, neither Dorado nor any Dorado Subsidiary shall,
between the date of this Agreement and the Effective Time,
directly or indirectly do, or propose to do, any of the
following without the prior written consent of Redfish:
(a) except to the extent required to comply with applicable
law, amend or otherwise change, or waive any provision of, its
certificate of incorporation or bylaws or equivalent
organizational documents;
(b) declare, set aside, make or pay any dividend or other
distribution, payable in cash, stock, property or otherwise,
with respect to any of its capital stock (except for such
declarations, set-asides, dividends and other distributions made
to or from any Dorado Subsidiary and Dorado or transactions
between Dorado and its wholly owned subsidiaries and
transactions among Dorados wholly owned subsidiaries);
(c) reclassify, combine, split or subdivide, or redeem,
purchase or otherwise acquire, directly or indirectly, any of
its capital stock, except in connection with the exercise of
options or the withholding of shares upon the vesting of
restricted stock to satisfy income tax withholding requirements;
(d) (i) acquire (including, without limitation, by
merger, consolidation or acquisition of stock or assets) any
corporation, partnership or other business organization or any
division thereof or any material amount of assets, other than
acquisitions for consideration of not more than $30,000,000 in
the aggregate; (ii) incur any indebtedness for borrowed
money or issue any debt securities or assume, guarantee or
endorse, or otherwise as an accommodation become responsible
for, the obligations of any person (other than Dorado or any of
the Dorado Subsidiaries), or make any loans or advances, except
(A) in the ordinary course of business and in a manner
consistent with past practice, (B) borrowings to refinance
existing indebtedness or (C) borrowings to finance any
acquisitions permitted by the terms of this Section 5.2; or
(iii) enter into or amend any contract, agreement,
commitment or arrangement with respect to any matter set forth
in this paragraph (d); or
A-39
(e) agree to take in writing, or otherwise, any of the
actions described in paragraphs (a) through (d) of
this Section 5.2 or any action which would result in any of
the conditions to the Merger not being satisfied (other than as
contemplated by this Agreement).
ARTICLE VI
Additional
Agreements
Section 6.1 Proxy
Statement; Stockholders Meeting.
(a) Dorado and Redfish shall cooperate and promptly prepare
the Registration Statement and the Joint Proxy Statement and
shall file the Registration Statement in which the Joint Proxy
Statement will be included as a prospectus with the SEC as soon
as reasonably practicable after the date hereof. Dorado and
Redfish shall cooperate to respond promptly to any comments made
by the SEC and otherwise use reasonable best efforts to cause
the Registration Statement to be declared effective under the
Securities Act as promptly as practicable after filing. Subject
to applicable laws, Dorado and Redfish each shall, upon request
by the other, furnish the other with all information concerning
itself, its subsidiaries, directors, officers and stockholders
and such other matters as may be reasonably necessary or
advisable in connection with the preparation and filing of the
Joint Proxy Statement and the Registration Statement as provided
for hereunder. Each of Dorado and Redfish agree to promptly
correct any information provided by it for use in the Joint
Proxy Statement or the Registration Statement which shall have
become false or misleading in any material respect. Each of
Dorado and Redfish shall cause the Joint Proxy Statement to be
mailed to its respective stockholders at the earliest
practicable time after the Registration Statement is declared
effective by the SEC. If at any time prior to the Effective Time
any event occurs that is required to be set forth in an
amendment or supplement to the Joint Proxy Statement or the
Registration Statement, Dorado or Redfish, as applicable, shall
inform the other promptly of such occurrence and cooperate in
filing such amendment or supplement with the SEC, use reasonable
best efforts to cause such amendment to become effective as
promptly as possible and, if required, mail that amendment or
supplement to stockholders of Dorado
and/or
Redfish. Dorado shall use reasonable best efforts, and Redfish
shall cooperate with Dorado, to obtain any and all state
securities laws or blue sky permits, approvals and
registrations necessary in connection with the issuance of
Dorado Common Stock pursuant to the Merger.
(b) Dorado shall cause the Registration Statement (and
Dorado and Redfish will cause the Joint Proxy Statement, each to
the extent that it provides information to be contained
therein), at the time it becomes effective under the Securities
Act, to comply as to form in all material respects with the
applicable provisions of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act
and the rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder, and Redfish
shall furnish to Dorado true, accurate and complete information
in all material respects relating to Redfish and holders of
Redfish Common Stock and Options as is required to be included
therein. Dorado shall advise Redfish, promptly after it receives
notice thereof, of the time when the Registration Statement has
become effective under the Securities Act, the issuance of any
stop order with respect to the Registration Statement, the
suspension of the qualification of the Dorado Common Stock
issuable in connection with the Merger for offering or sale in
any jurisdiction, or any comment or request for additional
information by the SEC with respect to the Registration
Statement.
(c) Each of Dorado and Redfish shall ensure that the
information provided by it for inclusion in the Joint Proxy
Statement and each amendment or supplement thereto, at the time
of mailing thereof and at the time of the respective meetings of
stockholders of Dorado and Redfish, or, in the case of
information provided by it for inclusion in the Registration
Statement or any amendment or supplement thereto, at the time it
becomes effective, will not include an untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not
misleading.
(d) Neither the Registration Statement nor the Joint Proxy
Statement nor any amendment or supplement (including by
incorporation by reference) thereto will be filed or
disseminated to the stockholders of Redfish or Dorado without
the approval of both Dorado and Redfish (which approval will not
be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned), but with
respect to documents filed by a party hereto that are
incorporated
A-40
by reference in the Registration Statement or Joint Proxy
Statement, this right of approval will apply only with respect
to information relating to the other party or its business,
financial condition or results of operations; and, further,
Redfish or Dorado, in connection with a Redfish Adverse
Recommendation Change or a Dorado Adverse Recommendation Change,
as the case may be, may amend or supplement the Joint Proxy
Statement or Registration Statement (including by incorporation
by reference) to effect such a Redfish Recommendation Change or
Dorado Adverse Recommendation Change, and in such event, this
right of approval will apply only with respect to information
relating to the other party or its business, financial condition
or results of operations.
(e) Redfish, acting through the Redfish Board of Directors,
shall, in accordance with applicable law and Redfishs
certificate of incorporation and bylaws, duly call, give notice
of, convene and hold an annual or special meeting of its
stockholders (the Redfish Stockholders
Meeting) as promptly as reasonably practicable after
the Registration Statement is declared effective under the
Securities Act for the purpose of obtaining the Redfish
Stockholder Approval. The Redfish Board of Directors shall,
subject to Section 6.3(b), recommend the adoption and
approval of this Agreement at the Redfish Stockholders Meeting
(the Redfish Recommendation), include such
recommendation in the Joint Proxy Statement and use its
reasonable best efforts to obtain the Redfish Stockholder
Approval. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, unless this Agreement is terminated in accordance with
Section 8.1 and in compliance with Section 6.3,
Redfish, regardless of whether the Redfish Board of Directors
has approved, endorsed or recommended an Acquisition Proposal
for Redfish or has withdrawn, modified or amended the Redfish
Recommendation, will submit this Agreement for approval by
Redfish Stockholders at the Redfish Stockholders Meeting.
(f) Dorado, acting through the Dorado Board of Directors,
shall, in accordance with applicable law and Dorados
certificate of incorporation and bylaws, duly call, give notice
of, convene and hold an annual or special meeting of its
stockholders (the Dorado Stockholders
Meeting) as promptly as reasonably practicable after
the Registration Statement is declared effective under the
Securities Act for the purpose of obtaining the Dorado
Stockholder Approval. The Dorado Board of Directors shall
recommend the adoption and approval of this Agreement at the
Dorado Stockholders Meeting (the Dorado
Recommendation), include such recommendation in the
Joint Proxy Statement and use its reasonable best efforts to
obtain the Dorado Stockholder Approval. The Dorado Board of
Directors may not withhold or withdraw or, in a manner adverse
to Redfish, modify or qualify the Dorado Recommendation (or
publicly propose to, or publicly state that it intends to,
withhold or withdraw or so modify or qualify the Dorado
Recommendation) (any such actions being a Dorado
Adverse Recommendation Change). Notwithstanding the
foregoing, at any time prior to obtaining the Dorado Stockholder
Approval, and subject to Dorado compliance at all times with the
provisions of this Section 6.1(f) and Section 6.6, the
Dorado Board of Directors may make a Dorado Adverse
Recommendation Change in response to an Intervening Event if the
Dorado Board of Directors concludes in good faith (after
consultation with outside legal counsel and, if appropriate, its
financial advisor) that the failure to take such action would
breach its fiduciary duties under applicable law. However, the
Dorado Board of Directors will not be entitled to exercise its
right to make a Dorado Adverse Recommendation Change unless
Dorado provides written notice to Redfish (a Dorado
Notice), at least four business days before taking
such action, of its intention to do so and Dorado otherwise
complies with this Section 6.1(f). A Dorado Notice shall
include a description of the Intervening Event. If requested by
Redfish, Dorado shall engage in good faith negotiations with
Redfish, during the four business day period after
Redfishs receipt of a Dorado Notice, to amend this
Agreement in such a manner such that the failure by the Dorado
Board of Directors to make a Dorado Adverse Recommendation
Change would no longer cause such board to be in breach of its
fiduciary duties under applicable law. Notwithstanding anything
in this Agreement to the contrary, unless this Agreement is
terminated in accordance with Section 8.1, Dorado will,
regardless of whether Dorado has withdrawn, modified or amended
the Dorado Recommendation, submit this Agreement for approval by
the Dorado Stockholders at the Dorado Stockholders Meeting. The
term Intervening Event means, with respect to
either party, a material event or circumstance that was not
known or reasonably foreseeable to the board of directors of
such party on the date of this Agreement (or if known, the
consequences of which are not known to or reasonably foreseeable
by such board of directors as of the date hereof), which event
or circumstance, or any material consequences thereof, becomes
known to the board of directors of such party prior to the time
at
A-41
which such party receives the Redfish Stockholder Approval or
Dorado Stockholder Approval, as applicable; provided, however,
that in no event shall any of the following constitute an
Intervening Event: (i) the receipt, existence or terms of
an Acquisition Proposal for Dorado or of information or any
communication that could lead to any acquisition by Dorado of
any business or assets other than Redfish, or any consequence
thereof, (ii) any failure to arrange or receive the
Financing or any Alternate Financing, or any of the terms or
consequences of the Financing or any Alternate Financing, or
(iii) any change in, or event or condition generally
affecting, the oil and natural gas industry or exploration and
production companies, including, without limitation, any change
in oil or natural gas prices or price differentials.
(g) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in
this Agreement, Dorado or Redfish, after consultation with the
other party hereto, may adjourn or postpone the Dorado
Stockholders Meeting or the Redfish Stockholders Meeting, as
applicable, to the extent it believes in good faith is necessary
to ensure that any required supplement or amendment to the Joint
Proxy Statement is provided to its stockholders or, if as of the
time for which the Dorado Stockholders Meeting or the Redfish
Stockholders Meeting is originally scheduled (as set forth in
the Joint Proxy Statement) there are insufficient shares of
Dorado Common Stock or Redfish Common Stock, as applicable,
represented (either in person or by proxy) to constitute a
quorum necessary to conduct business at such meeting or to
obtain approval of the matters to be considered thereat, or,
regarding the Dorado Stockholders Meeting to the extent Dorado
believes in good faith is necessary in order to facilitate
securing the Financing as near as practicable to the time of the
Dorado Stockholder Meeting.
(h) Prior to the Effective Time, Dorado shall use all
reasonable efforts to obtain authorization for listing on the
New York Stock Exchange of the shares of Dorado Common Stock
issuable and required to be reserved for issuance in connection
with the Merger, subject to official notice of issuance.
(i) Each of Redfish and Dorado will use reasonable best
efforts to hold the Redfish Stockholders Meeting and the Dorado
Stockholders Meeting, respectively, on the same date as the
other party and as soon as reasonably practicable after the date
of this Agreement.
Section 6.2 Access
to Information; Confidentiality.
(a) To the extent not restricted by third-party agreement
or applicable law, each of Dorado and Redfish will afford the
other and the others employees, representatives,
consultants, attorneys, investment bankers, agents, lenders and
other advisors reasonable access during normal business hours to
all of its facilities, properties, personnel, books and records.
Any such investigation shall be conducted in a manner that
minimizes any interference with the operations of Dorado and
Redfish, as the case may be. Each of Dorado and Redfish may, at
their own expense, photocopy information it reviews, subject to
applicable third-party approvals. Each of Dorado and Redfish
agrees to indemnify and hold the other party harmless from any
and all claims and liabilities, including costs and expenses for
loss, injury to or death of any representative of Dorado or
Redfish, as the case may be, and any loss, damage to or
destruction of any property owned by Dorado or Redfish or any
other person or entity (including claims or liabilities for loss
of use of any property) resulting directly or indirectly from
the action or inaction of any of their respective
representatives during any visit to the others business or
property sites prior to the Effective Time, whether pursuant to
this Section 6.2 or otherwise. Neither Dorado nor Redfish,
nor any of their respective employees, representatives,
consultants, attorneys, investment bankers, agents, lenders or
other advisors, shall conduct any environmental testing or
sampling on any of the business or property sites of the other
party prior to the Effective Time without the prior written
consent of the other party.
(b) To the extent permitted by applicable law, in order to
facilitate the continuing operation of Redfish by Dorado without
disruption and to assist in an achievement of an orderly
transition in the ownership and management of Redfish, until the
Effective Time, Redfish and Dorado shall cooperate reasonably
with each other to effect an orderly transition including,
without limitation, with respect to communications with
employees.
(c) Any information obtained by either party hereto or its
employees, representatives, consultants, attorneys, investment
bankers, agents, lenders and other advisors under this
Section 6.2 shall be subject to the
A-42
confidentiality and use restrictions contained in those certain
letter agreements between Redfish and Dorado dated
September 30, 2009 and October 19, 2009 (the
Confidentiality Agreements).
(d) Nothing in this Section 6.2 shall require Dorado
or Redfish to provide any information which it reasonably
believes it may not provide to the other by reason of applicable
law, rules or regulations, which constitutes information
protected by attorney/client privilege, or which Dorado or
Redfish (or any of their respective subsidiaries) is required to
keep confidential by reason of contract, agreement or
understanding with third parties in effect on the date hereof.
Section 6.3 No
Solicitation.
(a) Except as expressly contemplated by this Agreement,
neither Redfish nor any of the Redfish Subsidiaries may, and
Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries shall direct their
respective officers, directors, investment bankers, attorneys,
accountants, financial advisors, agents and other
representatives not to, (i) directly or indirectly
initiate, solicit, knowingly encourage or knowingly facilitate
(including by way of furnishing non-public information) any
inquiry or the making or submission of any proposal that
constitutes, or could reasonably be expected to lead to, an
Acquisition Proposal for Redfish, (ii) participate or
engage in discussions or negotiations with, or disclose any
non-public information or data relating to Redfish or any of the
Redfish Subsidiaries or afford access to the properties, books
or records of Redfish or any of the Redfish Subsidiaries to any
person that has made an Acquisition Proposal for Redfish or to
any person in contemplation of an Acquisition Proposal for
Redfish, or (iii) accept an Acquisition Proposal for
Redfish or enter into any agreement, including any letter of
intent, memorandum of understanding, agreement in principle,
merger agreement, acquisition agreement, option agreement, joint
venture agreement, partnership agreement or other similar
agreement, arrangement or understanding, (A) constituting
or related to, or that is intended to or could reasonably be
expected to lead to, any Acquisition Proposal for Redfish (other
than an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement permitted pursuant
to this Section 6.3) or (B) requiring, intended to
cause, or which could reasonably be expected to cause Redfish to
abandon, terminate or fail to consummate the Merger (any
agreement, arrangement or understanding referred to in this
clause (iii), an Acquisition Agreement). Any
violation of any of the foregoing restrictions by any Redfish
Subsidiary, by any director or executive officer of Redfish, or
by any other representative of Redfish or any Redfish Subsidiary
acting at the direction of the Redfish Board of Directors or any
director or executive officer of Redfish, will constitute a
breach of this Agreement by Redfish. Notwithstanding anything to
the contrary in this Agreement, Redfish and the Redfish Board of
Directors may take any action described in clause (ii) or
(iii) of this Section 6.3(a) with respect to a third
party if at any time after the execution of this Agreement and
prior to obtaining the Redfish Stockholder Approval
(w) Redfish receives a written Acquisition Proposal for
Redfish from that third party (and an Acquisition Proposal for
Redfish from that third party was not during that time period
initiated, solicited, knowingly encouraged or knowingly
facilitated in violation of this Section 6.3 by Redfish, by
any Redfish Subsidiary, by any executive officer or director of
Redfish, or by any other representative of Redfish or any
Redfish Subsidiary acting at the direction of the Redfish Board
of Directors or any director or executive officer of Redfish),
and (x) the Redfish Board of Directors determines in good
faith (after consultation with its financial advisors and
outside legal counsel) that such proposal constitutes or could
reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal, but
Redfish may not deliver any information to that third party
without entering into an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement
and (y) Redfish has previously disclosed or concurrently
discloses or makes available the same information, if any, to
Dorado as it makes available to that third party and provides to
Dorado a copy of the Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement that
Redfish entered into with that third party. Nothing contained in
this Section 6.3 shall prohibit Redfish or the Redfish
Board of Directors from taking and disclosing to the Redfish
Stockholders a position with respect to an Acquisition Proposal
for Redfish contemplated by
Rule 14d-9
or 14e-2(a)
promulgated under the Exchange Act; provided,
however, that any disclosure of a position contemplated
by
Rule 14e-2(a)
or
Rule 14d-9
promulgated under the Exchange Act other than a stop, look
and listen or similar communication of the type
contemplated by
Rule 14d-9(f)
under the Exchange Act, that is not coupled with an express
rejection of any applicable Acquisition Proposal for Redfish or
an express reaffirmation of its recommendation to its
stockholders in favor of the Merger shall be deemed to be a
Redfish Adverse Recommendation Change. Any action permitted by
A-43
this Section 6.3(a) shall not constitute a breach of
Redfishs representations, warranties or covenants in this
Agreement.
(b) Neither (i) the Redfish Board of Directors nor any
committee thereof may directly or indirectly (A) withdraw
(or amend or modify in a manner adverse to Dorado), or propose
publicly to withdraw (or amend or modify in a manner adverse to
Dorado), the approval, recommendation or declaration of
advisability by the Redfish Board of Directors or any such
committee thereof of this Agreement, the Merger or the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement or
(B) recommend, adopt or approve, or propose publicly to
recommend, adopt or approve, any Acquisition Proposal for
Redfish (any action described in this clause (i) being
referred to as a Redfish Adverse Recommendation
Change) nor (ii) shall Redfish or any of the
Redfish Subsidiaries execute or enter into an Acquisition
Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing or Section 6.3(e),
at any time prior to obtaining the Redfish Stockholder Approval,
and subject to Redfishs compliance at all times with the
provisions of this Section 6.3 and Section 6.6, the
Redfish Board of Directors may (v) in response to a
Superior Proposal, make a Redfish Adverse Recommendation Change
and enter into an Acquisition Agreement but only so long as
Redfish terminates this Agreement pursuant to, and concurrently
complies with all the provisions of, Section 8.1(d)(ii) and
8.3 and (w) make a Redfish Adverse Recommendation Change in
response to an Intervening Event if the Redfish Board of
Directors concludes in good faith (after consultation with
outside legal counsel) that the failure to take such action
would breach its fiduciary duties under applicable law. However,
the Redfish Board of Directors will not be entitled to exercise
its right to make a Redfish Adverse Recommendation Change unless
Redfish provides written notice to Dorado (a Redfish
Notice), at least four business days before taking
such action, of its intention to do so and Redfish otherwise
complies with this Section 6.3(b). A Redfish Notice shall
(i) if the Redfish Board of Directors intends to make a
Redfish Adverse Recommendation Change in response to an
Acquisition Proposal for Redfish that constitutes a Superior
Proposal, specify the material terms and conditions of that
Superior Proposal and identify the person or group making that
Superior Proposal, or (ii) if the Redfish Board of
Directors intends to make a Redfish Adverse Recommendation
Change in response to an Intervening Event, include a
description of the Intervening Event. Redfish will not be
entitled to exercise its right to make a Redfish Adverse
Recommendation Change under clause (v) above and enter into
an Acquisition Agreement in response to a Superior Proposal
(x) until four business days after Redfish provides a
Redfish Notice to Dorado and (y) if during that four
business day period, Dorado proposes any alternative transaction
(including any modifications to the terms of this Agreement),
unless the Redfish Board of Directors determines in good faith
(after consultation with its financial advisors and outside
legal counsel, and taking into account all financial, legal, and
regulatory terms and conditions of that alternative transaction
proposal) that such alternative transaction proposal is not at
least as favorable to the Redfish Stockholders as the Superior
Proposal (it being understood that any change in the financial
or other material terms of a Superior Proposal in response to
any alternative transaction proposal (including any
modifications to the terms of this Agreement) by Dorado will
require a new Redfish Notice and a new two business day period
under this Section 6.3(b)). If requested by Dorado, Redfish
shall engage in good faith negotiations with Dorado, during the
four or two business day period after Dorados receipt of a
Redfish Notice specifying that the Redfish Board of Directors
intends to make a Redfish Adverse Recommendation Change in
response to an Intervening Event, to amend this Agreement in
such a manner such that the failure by the Redfish Board of
Directors to make a Redfish Adverse Recommendation Change would
no longer cause such board to be in breach of its fiduciary
duties under applicable law. Notwithstanding anything in this
Agreement to the contrary, disclosure (including without
limitation the public disclosure) by Redfish of any Acquisition
Proposal for Redfish and the operation of this Agreement with
respect thereto shall not be deemed to be a Redfish Adverse
Recommendation Change, so long as Redfish includes in any such
disclosure a statement that the Redfish Board of Directors has
not changed its recommendation with respect to this Agreement.
(c) In addition to the obligations of Redfish and Dorado
set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this
Section 6.3, as promptly as practicable after receipt
thereof, Redfish shall advise Dorado in writing of any
Acquisition Proposal for Redfish received from any person, and
the terms and conditions of such Acquisition Proposal for
Redfish, and Redfish shall promptly provide to Dorado copies of
any written materials received by Redfish from such person in
connection with any of the foregoing, and the identity of the
person or group of persons making any such Acquisition Proposal
for Redfish. Redfish shall provide simultaneously to Dorado
A-44
any non-public information concerning itself or the Redfish
Subsidiaries provided to any such other person or group in
connection with any Acquisition Proposal for Redfish that was
not previously provided to Dorado. Redfish shall keep Dorado
fully informed of the status of any Acquisition Proposal for
Redfish (including the identity of the parties and price
involved and any changes to any material terms and conditions
thereof). Redfish shall not release any third party from, or
waive any provision of, any confidentiality or standstill
agreement to which it is a party, except, with respect to any
such agreement in effect prior to the date hereof, in response
to a request therefor from the other party thereto, if that
other party initiated the communication that ultimately led to
that request, and then only to the extent necessary to enable
that other party to make an inquiry, submit a proposal or
initiate discussions that, in any such event, would not result
from or constitute a violation by Redfish or any of the Redfish
Subsidiaries of any of their obligations under this
Section 6.3.
(d) For purposes of this Agreement Acquisition
Proposal, with respect to any entity, means any bona
fide proposal, whether or not in writing, for the
(i) direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of a
business or assets that constitute 15% or more of the net
revenues, net income or the assets (based on the fair market
value thereof) of such entity and its subsidiaries, taken as a
whole, (ii) direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of
15% or more of any class of equity securities or capital stock
of such entity or any of its subsidiaries whose business
constitutes 15% or more of the net revenues, net income or
assets of such entity and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or
(iii) merger, consolidation, restructuring, transfer of
assets or other business combination, sale of shares of capital
stock, tender offer, exchange offer, recapitalization, stock
repurchase program or other similar transaction that if
consummated would result in any person beneficially owning 15%
or more of any class of equity securities of such entity or any
of its subsidiaries whose business constitutes 15% or more of
the net revenues, net income or assets of such entity and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, other than the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement. The term Superior
Proposal means any bona fide written Acquisition
Proposal with respect to Redfish made by a third party to
acquire, directly or indirectly, pursuant to a tender offer,
exchange offer, merger, share exchange, consolidation or other
business combination, (A) 50% or more of the assets of
Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or
(B) 50% or more of the then outstanding equity securities
of Redfish, in each case on terms that a majority of the board
of directors of Redfish determines in good faith (after
consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal
counsel, and taking into account all financial, legal and
regulatory terms and conditions of the Acquisition Proposal and
this Agreement, including any alternative transaction (including
any modification to the terms of this Agreement) proposed by any
other party in response to that Superior Proposal, including any
conditions to and expected timing of consummation, and any risks
of non-consummation, of such Acquisition Proposal) to be more
favorable to the Redfish Stockholders (in their capacity as
stockholders) than the transactions contemplated hereby and any
alternative transaction (including any modification to the terms
of this Agreement) proposed by Dorado pursuant to this
Section 6.3. For purposes of this Agreement the term
Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement means a
confidentiality agreement executed by Redfish and the applicable
counterparty having confidentiality provisions that are at least
as favorable to Redfish as those of the Confidentiality
Agreements.
(e) Immediately after the execution and delivery of this
Agreement, Redfish will, and will cause the Redfish Subsidiaries
to, and Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries will use their
reasonable best efforts to cause their respective officers,
directors, employees, investment bankers, attorneys, accountants
and other agents to, terminate any activities, discussions or
negotiations with any parties conducted heretofore with respect
to any possible Acquisition Proposal for Redfish. Redfish shall
(i) take the necessary steps to inform promptly its
officers, directors, investments bankers, attorneys,
accountants, financial advisors, agents or other representatives
involved in the transactions contemplated by this Agreement of
the obligations undertaken in this Section 6.3 and
(ii) request each person who has heretofore executed a
confidentiality agreement in connection with that persons
consideration of acquiring Redfish or any material portion
thereof to return or destroy all confidential information
heretofore furnished to that person by or on its behalf to the
extent such request is permitted or contemplated by that
confidentiality agreement.
Section 6.4 Directors
and Officers Indemnification and Insurance.
(a) The certificate of incorporation of Dorado and each of
its subsidiaries which before the Merger were Redfish
Subsidiaries shall contain provisions no less favorable with
respect to indemnification and
A-45
advancement of expenses than are set forth in the certificate of
incorporation of Redfish or such Redfish Subsidiary as of the
date of this Agreement, which provisions shall not be amended,
repealed or otherwise modified for a period of six years from
the Effective Time in any manner that would adversely affect the
rights thereunder of individuals who at any time from and after
the date of this Agreement and to and including the Effective
Time were directors, officers, employees, fiduciaries or agents
of Redfish or any of the Redfish Subsidiaries in respect of
actions or omissions occurring at or prior to the Effective Time
(including, without limitation, the matters contemplated by this
Agreement).
(b) From and after the Effective Time, the Surviving
Entity, shall, to the fullest extent permitted under applicable
law, indemnify and hold harmless and advance expenses to, each
present and former director, officer, employee, fiduciary and
agent of Redfish and each Redfish Subsidiary and each person who
served as a director, officer, employee, fiduciary or agent of
another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, pension
or other employee benefit plan or enterprise at the request of
Redfish or any Redfish Subsidiary (each, together with such
persons heirs, executors or administrators, an
Indemnified Party and, collectively the
Indemnified Parties) against all costs and
expenses (including attorneys fees), judgments, fines,
losses, claims, damages, inquiries, liabilities and settlement
amounts paid in connection with any threatened or actual claim,
action, suit, proceeding or investigation (whether arising
before or after the Effective Time), whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative, arising out of or pertaining to
any action or omission in their capacity as an officer,
director, employee, fiduciary or agent (including, without
limitation, any claim arising out of this Agreement or any of
the transactions contemplated hereby), whether asserted or
claimed prior to, at or after the Effective Time, for a period
of six years after the later of the date of this Agreement or
the Effective Time, in each case to the fullest extent permitted
under the DGCL (and shall pay any expenses in advance of the
final disposition of any such action or proceeding to each
Indemnified Party to the fullest extent permitted under the
DGCL, upon receipt from the Indemnified Party to whom expenses
are advanced of any undertaking to repay such advances required
under the DGCL). In the event of any such claim, action, suit,
proceeding or investigation, (i) the Indemnified Parties
may retain Redfishs regularly engaged legal counsel or
other counsel (including local counsel) satisfactory to them,
and Redfish or the Surviving Entity, as the case may be, shall
promptly pay the reasonable fees and expenses of such counsel,
after statements therefor are received and (ii) Redfish and
the Surviving Entity shall use all reasonable efforts in the
vigorous defense of any such matter; provided, however,
that neither Redfish nor the Surviving Entity shall be liable
for any settlement effected without its written consent (which
consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or
conditioned); and provided, further, that neither Redfish
nor the Surviving Entity shall be obligated pursuant to this
Section 6.4(b) to pay the fees and expenses of more than
one counsel (plus appropriate local counsel) for all Indemnified
Parties in any single action unless there is, as determined by
counsel to the Indemnified Parties, under applicable standards
of professional conduct, a conflict or a reasonable likelihood
of a conflict on any significant issue between the positions of
any two or more Indemnified Parties, in which case such
additional counsel (including local counsel) as may be required
to avoid any such conflict or likely conflict may be retained by
the Indemnified Parties at the expense of Redfish or the
Surviving Entity; and provided, further, that, in the
event that any claim for indemnification is asserted or made
within such six-year period, all rights to indemnification in
respect of such claim shall continue until the disposition of
such claim.
(c) For a period of six years after the Effective Time, the
Surviving Entity shall maintain in effect the current
directors and officers liability insurance policies
maintained by Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries (provided
that the Surviving Entity may substitute therefor third-party
policies of at least the same coverage and amounts containing
terms and conditions which are no less advantageous to such
officers and directors so long as substitution does not result
in gaps or lapses in coverage) with respect to matters occurring
on or before the Effective Time; provided, that the
Surviving Entity shall not be required to pay annual premiums in
excess of 250% of the last annual premium paid by Redfish prior
to the date hereof (the amount of which premium is set forth in
Schedule 6.4), but in such case shall purchase as
much coverage as reasonably practicable for such amount.
(d) In the event the Surviving Entity or any of its
respective successors or assigns (i) consolidates with or
merges into any other person and shall not be the continuing or
surviving entity of such consolidation or merger or
(ii) transfers all or substantially all of its properties
and assets to any person, then, and in each such
A-46
case, proper provision shall be made so that the successors and
assigns of the Surviving Entity shall assume the obligations set
forth in this Section 6.4.
(e) The Surviving Entity shall pay all reasonable expenses,
including attorneys fees, that may be incurred by any
Indemnified Party in enforcing the indemnity and other
obligations provided in this Section 6.4.
(f) The obligations of Redfish and Dorado under this
Section 6.4 shall not be terminated or modified in such a
manner as to adversely affect any director, officer, employee,
fiduciary and agent to whom this Section 6.4 applies
without the consent of each affected director, officer,
employee, fiduciary or agent (it being expressly agreed that the
directors, officers, employees, fiduciaries and agents to whom
this Section 6.4 applies shall be third-party beneficiaries
of this Section 6.4). The rights of each Indemnified Party
hereunder shall be in addition to any other rights such
Indemnified Party may have under the certificate of
incorporation, bylaws or other governing documents of Redfish or
its Subsidiaries, any other indemnification agreement or
arrangement, the DGCL or otherwise.
Section 6.5 Notification
of Certain Matters. Redfish shall give prompt
notice to Dorado, and Dorado shall give prompt notice to
Redfish, of (i) the occurrence, or nonoccurrence, of any
event the occurrence, or nonoccurrence, of which would be likely
to cause any representation or warranty contained in this
Agreement to be materially untrue or inaccurate and
(ii) any failure of Redfish or Dorado, as the case may be,
to comply with or satisfy in any material respect any covenant,
condition or agreement required to be complied with or satisfied
by it hereunder; provided, however, that the delivery of
any notice pursuant to this Section 6.5 shall not limit or
otherwise affect the remedies available hereunder to the party
receiving such notice and this Section 6.5 will not
constitute a covenant, obligation or agreement for purposes of
Article VIII hereof.
Section 6.6 Further
Action; Best Efforts.
(a) Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of this
Agreement, and subject, in the case of both parties, to
Section 6.1, and in the case of Redfish, to
Section 6.3 hereof, each of the parties hereto shall
cooperate and use its best efforts to take, or cause to be
taken, all actions and to do, or cause to be done, all things
necessary, proper or advisable under applicable law to
consummate the Merger and the other transactions contemplated
hereby, including (i) preparing and filing as promptly as
practicable with any Governmental Authority or other third party
all documentation to effect all necessary filings, notices,
petitions, statements, registrations, submissions of
information, applications and other documents,
(ii) obtaining and maintaining all approvals, consents,
registrations, permits, authorizations and other confirmations
required to be obtained from any Governmental Authority or other
third party that are necessary, proper or advisable to
consummate the Merger and the other transactions contemplated
hereby, and (iii) vigorously defending or contesting any
litigation or administrative proceeding, and seeking to have
vacated, lifted, reversed or overturned any order, decree,
injunction or ruling (whether temporary, preliminary or
permanent) that is in effect, and that seeks to or would
prohibit, prevent, enjoin or materially restrain or delay the
consummation of the Merger or any of the other transactions
contemplated hereby. In furtherance and not in limitation of the
foregoing, Dorado and Redfish shall (A) make an appropriate
filing of a Notification and Report Form pursuant to the HSR Act
with respect to the Merger as promptly as practicable, and in
any event within 15 business days of the date hereof,
(B) supply as promptly as practicable any additional
information and documentary material that may be requested
pursuant to the HSR Act and in any event, substantially
comply and certify substantial compliance with any request
for additional information (also known as a second
request) issued pursuant to the HSR Act within
60 days of such request, and (C) take all other
actions necessary to cause the expiration or termination of the
applicable waiting period under the HSR Act as soon as
practicable. Notwithstanding any other provision of this
Agreement to the contrary, Dorado shall take, or cause to be
taken, any and all actions, including the disposition of assets,
the taking of mitigating steps or the making of agreements or
commitments, required by any Governmental Authority as a
condition to the granting of any approval, consent,
registration, permit, authorization or other confirmation under
the HSR Act or otherwise necessary for the consummation of the
Merger or as may be required to avoid, lift, vacate or reverse
any legislative, administrative or judicial action that would
otherwise prevent or materially restrain or delay the
consummation of the Merger.
A-47
(b) Each of Redfish and Dorado shall (i) promptly
notify the other of any communication concerning this Agreement,
the Merger or the other transactions contemplated hereby to that
party or its affiliates from any Governmental Authority and
permit the other to review in advance any proposed communication
concerning this Agreement, the Merger or the other transactions
contemplated hereby to any Governmental Authority; (ii) not
participate or agree to participate in any meeting or discussion
with any Governmental Authority in respect of any filing,
investigation or other inquiry concerning this Agreement, the
Merger or the other transactions contemplated hereby unless it
consults with the other in advance and, to the extent permitted
by such Governmental Authority, gives the other party the
opportunity to attend and participate in such meeting or
discussion; and (iii) furnish the other party with copies
of all correspondence, filings and communications (and memoranda
setting forth the substance thereof) between it and its
affiliates and representatives on the one hand, and any
Governmental Authority or members of any such authoritys
staff on the other hand, with respect to this Agreement, the
Merger or the other transactions contemplated hereby.
(c) Each party agrees that, from and after the date hereof
and prior to the Effective Time, and except as may be agreed in
writing by the other party or as may be expressly permitted
pursuant to this Agreement, it shall not, and shall not permit
any of its subsidiaries to agree, in writing or otherwise, to
take any action which could reasonably be expected to delay the
consummation of the Merger or result in the failure to satisfy
any condition to consummation of the Merger.
Section 6.7 Public
Announcements. Dorado and Redfish shall consult
with each other before issuing any press release or otherwise
making any public statements with respect to this Agreement or
the transactions contemplated hereby and shall not issue any
such press release or make any such public statement without the
others prior written consent, which shall not be
unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed, except as may be
required by law or any listing agreement with a national
securities exchange to which Dorado or Redfish is a party.
Section 6.8 Employee
Matters.
(a) The Surviving Entity shall employ, immediately after
the Effective Time, all persons who were employees of Redfish
immediately prior to the Effective Time, but except as required
by law, the Surviving Entity will have no obligation to continue
employing any such employee for any length of time thereafter
except pursuant to any agreement that is specifically disclosed
on any Schedule referenced in Section 3.11 and identified
therein as providing such an exception. All employees and former
employees whom the Surviving Entity has decided to continue to
employ shall be provided with employee benefits that are
comparable to other similarly situated employees of Dorado. The
Surviving Entity shall treat the period of employment with
Redfish (and with predecessor employers with respect to which
Redfish has granted service credit) as employment and service
with Dorado and the Surviving Entity for benefit plan
eligibility and vesting purposes (but not for purposes of
benefit accruals or benefit computations, other than for
purposes of vacation, sick pay or other paid time off) for all
of the Surviving Entitys employee benefit plans, programs,
policies or arrangements to the extent service with Dorado or
the Surviving Entity is recognized under any such plan, program,
policy or arrangement, except to the extent such treatment would
result in duplicative benefits for the same period of service,
to the extent such service is prior to a specific date before
which service would not have been credited for employees of
Dorado. For the calendar year in which the Effective Time
occurs, Dorado agrees to credit each employee of Redfish or any
Redfish Subsidiary with an amount of vacation and sick leave
equal to the employees unused vacation and sick leave
under Redfishs vacation and sick leave policy immediately
prior to the Effective Time based on the policy as in effect
immediately prior to the Effective Time.
(b) Under any medical or dental plan covering any employee
or former employee of Redfish, there shall be waived, and the
Surviving Entity shall cause the relevant insurance carriers and
other third parties to waive, restrictions and limitations for
any medical condition existing as of the Effective Time of any
such employee and his or her eligible dependents for the purpose
of any such plan, so long as those persons had the requisite
creditable service prior to the Effective Time,
provided, however, that such treatment shall not apply to a
preexisting condition of any employee or former employee of
Redfish who was, as of the Effective Time, excluded from
participation in a Plan by virtue of such preexisting condition,
and provided, further, that any
A-48
employee or former employee of Redfish whose credited service
with Redfish would still subject him or her to an exclusion or
waiting period if such service were treated as service with
Dorado or the Surviving Entity shall be subject to the exclusion
or waiting period until he or she has sufficient aggregate
service with the Surviving Entity and Redfish. Further, the
Surviving Entity shall offer to each Redfish employee coverage
under a group health plan that credits that employee toward the
deductibles imposed under the group medical and dental plan of
the Surviving Entity, for the year during which the Effective
Time occurs, with any deductible already incurred during that
year under the relevant Redfish Plan.
(c) Redfish may pay to each person who is a participant in
an annual incentive program (a Bonus Plan
Participant):
(i) a cash bonus with respect to calendar year 2009 in an
amount equal to the Bonus Plan Participants target annual
cash incentive opportunity, as determined by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors of Redfish on
February 9, 2009, or as disclosed to Dorado in writing
prior to the execution of this Agreement (except as to any
employee of Redfish and any Redfish Subsidiary who was not
employed by Redfish or any Redfish Subsidiary, as applicable,
prior to 2009 or was not otherwise eligible for full annual
incentive bonus in respect of 2008, Redfish shall pay a 2009
annual bonus in an amount commensurate with amounts being paid
to other employees of Redfish and any Redfish Subsidiary, as
applicable, with similar job titles or
responsibilities); and
(ii) an equity compensation bonus with respect to calendar
year 2009 in an amount equal to the Bonus Plan
Participants target annual equity incentive opportunity,
with such equity compensation bonus to be paid solely in the
form of restricted shares of Redfish Common Stock (the
Redfish 2009 Bonus Restricted Shares) valued
based on the fair market value of Redfish Common Stock on the
date of grant, and granted upon the earlier of (A) the time
that annual incentive bonuses for 2009 would be paid in the
ordinary course of business or (B) immediately prior to the
Effective Time. The Redfish 2009 Bonus Restricted Shares shall
be granted under the 2008 Stock Plan on the following terms and
conditions:
(A) vesting of the Redfish 2009 Bonus Restricted Shares
will occur over such period of time, but in no event less than
four years, and on such terms (consistent with past practices
but as modified by Section 6.8(c)(ii)(B) below) as the
Compensation Committee of the Redfish Board of Directors shall
determine at the time of grant;
(B) the Redfish 2009 Bonus Restricted Shares shall not vest
upon the occurrence of the Effective Time, but shall convert at
the Effective Time into a number of restricted shares of Dorado
Common Stock (Converted Restricted Shares)
determined by multiplying the number of shares of Redfish Common
Stock subject to such grant by the Exchange Ratio;
(C) notwithstanding (A) above, the Converted
Restricted Shares shall vest immediately in full upon the
termination of the applicable Bonus Plan Participants
employment by the Surviving Entity or an affiliate without Cause
or due to such participants Resignation for Good Reason
within the meaning of the Employee Severance Protection Plan.
(iii) Within 30 days following the Effective Time, the
Compensation Committee of the Dorado Board of Directors shall
grant to each Bonus Plan Participant who remains employed by the
Surviving Entity or an affiliate following the Effective Time an
award consistent with awards granted to similarly situated
Dorado employees in accordance with Dorados past practices.
(d) With respect to calendar year 2010, the target annual
incentive opportunity for each Bonus Plan Participant shall be
the same as such target for calendar year 2009, and any Bonus
Plan Participant who is terminated following the Effective Time
and prior to the date on which annual bonuses for 2010 are paid
to Dorado employees in the ordinary course as a result of an
involuntary termination without Cause or Resignation for Good
Reason (within the meaning of the Employee Severance Protection
Plan) shall receive a bonus payout for 2010 in an amount at
least equal to the Bonus Plan Participants target annual
incentive opportunity (including for this purposes the cash
equivalent of any options or restricted stock that would have
been payable in respect of performance during calendar year
2010), prorated based on the number of days that
A-49
have elapsed in calendar year 2010 through the date on which the
termination of employment occurs, with such bonus paid in cash
within 10 days following termination of employment. With
respect to any employees of Redfish and any Redfish Subsidiary
who was not employed by Redfish or any Redfish Subsidiary, as
applicable, prior to 2010 or was not otherwise eligible for full
annual incentive bonus in respect of 2009, Redfish shall set an
annual incentive opportunity in an amount commensurate with
amounts being paid to other employees of Redfish and any Redfish
Subsidiary, as applicable, with similar job titles or
responsibilities.
(e) Dorado hereby acknowledges that a Change in
Control within the meaning of the Employee Severance
Protection Plan, the 2000 Stock Plan, the 2008 Stock Plan and
the Long-Term Incentive Plan of the MLP General Partner will
occur at the Effective Time. Notwithstanding anything in this
Agreement to the contrary, Dorado shall honor all of the terms
and conditions of the Employee Severance Protection Plan, the
2000 Stock Plan, the 2008 Stock Plan, the Partnership Agreement
and the Long-Term Incentive Plan of the MLP General Partner,
without any adverse effect on any employee or former employee of
Redfish or any Redfish Subsidiary.
(f) Dorado hereby agrees to operate and implement
and/or cause
the Surviving Entity to operate and implement the Employee
Severance Protection Plan in compliance with Section 409A
of the Code to the extent applicable and to the extent such plan
document is in compliance therewith as of January 1, 2009,
and acknowledges that such plan may not be amended or terminated
prior to the second anniversary of the Merger without the
express consent of employees covered thereby or as may be
required in order to comply with applicable law.
(g) Prior to the Effective Time, if requested by Dorado,
Redfish will take such action as is necessary to terminate the
Redfish 401(k) Plan and will take all necessary action to ensure
that each Redfish employee is fully vested in his or her account
balance under the Redfish 401(k) Plan. As soon as practicable
following IRS approval of the termination of the Redfish 401(k)
Plan, the assets thereof shall be distributed and Dorado shall
permit Redfish employees employed by Dorado to roll any eligible
rollover distributions (and loans under the Redfish 401(k) Plan)
into Dorados 401(k) Plan. If the Redfish 401(k) Plan is
terminated, employees of Redfish shall be eligible as of the
Effective Time to participate in Dorados 401(k) Plan.
Section 6.9 Section 16
Matters. Prior to the Effective Time, Redfish and
Dorado shall take steps reasonably necessary to cause
dispositions of shares of Redfish Common Stock (including
derivative securities) and acquisitions of Dorado Common Stock
(including derivative securities) pursuant to the Merger by each
individual who is subject to Section 16 of the Exchange
Act, or will become subject to such reporting requirements with
respect to Dorado, to be exempt under
Rule 16b-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act.
Section 6.10 Redfish
Indebtedness. The parties agree and acknowledge
that within 30 days after the consummation of the Merger,
Dorado shall make change of control purchase offers
to the holders of each series of Redfishs senior
subordinated notes in the manner, at the times and otherwise in
compliance with the requirements set forth in the respective
applicable indentures and shall purchase the notes of any such
holders who properly tender their notes pursuant to such offers.
Section 6.11 Financing.
(a) Dorado shall use its reasonable best efforts to take,
or cause to be taken, all actions and to do, or cause to be
done, all things necessary, proper or advisable to arrange and
consummate the financing necessary for the Funds (the
Financing) on the terms and conditions
described in the Commitment Letter, including using its
reasonable best efforts to (i) satisfy on a timely basis
all terms, covenants and conditions set forth in the Commitment
Letter; (ii) enter into definitive agreements with respect
thereto on the terms and conditions contemplated by the
Commitment Letter; (iii) enforce its rights under the
Commitment Letter; and (iv) consummate the Financing on or
prior to the Outside Date. Dorado will furnish correct and
complete copies of all such definitive agreements to Redfish
promptly upon their execution.
(b) Dorado shall keep Redfish informed with respect to all
material activity concerning the status of the Financing
contemplated by the Commitment Letter and shall give Redfish
prompt notice of any material adverse change with respect to
such Financing. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, Dorado agrees
A-50
to notify Redfish promptly, and in any event within two business
days, if at any time (i) the Commitment Letter shall expire
or be terminated, rescinded or withdrawn for any reason,
(ii) any financing source that is a party to the Commitment
Letter notifies Dorado that such source no longer intends to
provide financing to Dorado on the terms set forth therein or
(iii) for any reason Dorado no longer believes in good
faith that it will be able to obtain all or any portion of the
Funds on the terms set forth in the Commitment Letter. Dorado
shall not, and shall not permit any of its affiliates to,
without the prior written consent of Redfish, take or fail to
take any action or enter into any transaction, including any
merger, acquisition, joint venture, disposition, lease, contract
or debt or equity financing, that could reasonably be expected
to breach or make untrue any representation or warranty
contained in the Commitment Letter or otherwise impair, delay or
prevent consummation of the Financing contemplated by the
Commitment Letter. Dorado shall not amend or alter, or agree to
amend or alter, the Commitment Letter in any manner that would
prevent, impair or delay the consummation of transactions
contemplated by this Agreement without the prior written consent
of Redfish.
(c) If any portion of the Funds becomes unavailable or the
Commitment Letter therefor shall be terminated, rescinded,
withdrawn or modified in a manner materially adverse to Dorado
for any reason, Dorado shall use its reasonable best efforts to
arrange to obtain alternative financing for the Funds from
alternative sources (Alternate Financing) and
to obtain, and, if obtained, will provide Redfish a copy of, a
new financing commitment that provides for at least the amount
of the Funds on terms and conditions (including termination
rights and funding conditions) no less favorable to Dorado, in
the aggregate, than those included in such prior commitment
letter (New Commitment Letter). To the extent
applicable, Dorado shall use its reasonable best efforts to
take, or cause to be taken, all action necessary, proper or
advisable to arrange promptly and consummate the Alternate
Financing on the terms and conditions described in any New
Commitment Letter, including compliance with the provisions of
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this Section 6.11,
which shall apply to any New Commitment Letter. Redfish
acknowledges that Dorados compliance with the provisions
of this Section 6.11(c) with respect to Alternate Financing
will not constitute a breach of the representations and
warranties of Dorado in Section 4.9.
(d) Dorado shall publicly announce, not later than the
Determination Date, (i) whether or not it has entered into
binding definitive agreements for the Financing and (ii) if
it has entered into such agreements, whether or not all
conditions to the obligations of the lenders to consummate the
Financing under such definitive agreements on the Closing Date
shall have been satisfied or waived as of the date of such
announcement (excluding for this purpose any conditions that by
their nature can be satisfied only at the time of consummation
of the Financing, provided that such excluded conditions would
be satisfied or capable of satisfaction if the date of such
consummation were the date of such announcement).
Section 6.12 Authorization
for Shares and Stock Exchange Listing. Prior to
the Effective Time, Dorado shall have taken all action necessary
to permit it to issue the number of shares of Dorado Common
Stock required to be issued pursuant to this Agreement. Dorado
shall use its best efforts to cause the shares of Dorado Common
Stock to be issued as contemplated hereby and the shares of
Dorado Common Stock to be reserved for issuance upon exercise of
Options to be approved for listing on the National Securities
Exchange, subject to official notice of issuance, prior to the
Closing Date.
Section 6.13 Rights
Agreement. Prior to the Effective Time, the
Redfish Board of Directors shall take any action (including, as
necessary, amending or terminating (but with respect to
termination, only as of immediately prior to the Effective Time)
the Rights Agreement) necessary so that (a) none of the
execution and delivery of this Agreement, the conversion of
shares of Redfish Common Stock into the right to receive the
Merger Consideration in accordance with this Agreement, and the
consummation of the Merger or any other transaction contemplated
by this Agreement hereby will cause (i) the Redfish Rights
to become exercisable under the Rights Agreement,
(ii) Dorado or any of its affiliates to be deemed an
Acquiring Person (as defined in the Rights
Agreement), (iii) the provisions of Section 11 or
Section 13 of the Rights Agreement to become applicable to
any such event or (iv) the Distribution Date or
the Stock Acquisition Date (each as defined in the
Rights Agreement) to occur upon any such event, and (b) the
Final Expiration Date (as defined in the Rights
Agreement) of the Redfish Rights will occur immediately prior to
the Effective Time so that the Redfish Rights will expire
immediately prior to the Effective Time. Without the prior
written consent of Dorado, neither the Redfish Board of
Directors nor Redfish shall take any other action to terminate
A-51
the Rights Agreement, redeem the Redfish Rights, cause any
person not to be or become an Acquiring Person or
otherwise amend the Rights Agreement in a manner, or take any
other action under the Rights Agreement, adverse to Dorado or
its affiliates.
Section 6.14 State
Takeover Laws. If any fair price,
moratorium, business combination, or
control share acquisition statute or other similar
statute or regulation is or shall become applicable to the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, Redfish and the
Redfish Board of Directors shall grant such approvals and take
such actions as are necessary so that the transactions
contemplated hereby may be consummated as promptly as
practicable on the terms contemplated hereby and shall otherwise
act to minimize the effects of any such statute or regulation on
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 6.15 Stockholder
Litigation. Redfish shall give Dorado the
opportunity to participate in the defense or settlement of any
stockholder litigation against Redfish
and/or its
directors or officers relating to the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement. Redfish agrees that it shall not settle or
offer to settle any litigation commenced on or after the date
hereof against Redfish or any of its directors or officers by
any stockholder of Redfish relating to this Agreement, the
Merger, any other transaction contemplated by this Agreement or
otherwise, without the prior written consent of Dorado (such
consent not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed).
Section 6.16 Reorganization.
(a) Each of Dorado and Redfish shall use its reasonable
best efforts to cause the Merger to qualify as a
reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code and to obtain the Tax opinions
described in Section 7.2(d) and Section 7.3(d). Dorado
and Redfish shall file all Tax Returns consistent with the
treatment of the Merger as a reorganization within
the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code and in particular
as a transaction described in Section 368(a)(1)(A) of the
Code. This Agreement is intended to constitute a plan of
reorganization within the meaning of Treasury
Regulation Sec. 1.368-2(g).
(b) Dorado shall deliver to Baker Botts L.L.P. and
Baker & Hostetler LLP a Tax Representation
Letter, dated as of the Closing Date and signed by an
officer of Dorado, containing representations of Dorado and
Redfish shall deliver to Baker Botts L.L.P. and
Baker & Hostetler LLP a Tax Representation
Letter, dated as of the Closing Date and signed by an
officer of Redfish, containing representations of Redfish, in
each case as shall be reasonably necessary or appropriate to
enable Baker Botts L.L.P. and Baker & Hostetler LLP to
render the opinions described in Section 7.2(d) and
Section 7.3(d). Each of Dorado and Redfish shall use its
reasonable best efforts not to take or cause to be taken any
action that would cause to be untrue (or fail to take or cause
not to be taken any action which would cause to be untrue) any
of the certifications and representations included in the tax
representation letters described in this Section 6.16.
Section 6.17 Comfort
Letters.
(a) In connection with the information regarding Redfish
and the Redfish Subsidiaries or the Merger provided by Redfish
specifically for inclusion in, or incorporation by reference
into, the Joint Proxy Statement and the Registration Statement,
Redfish shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause to be
delivered to Dorado a letter of Ernst & Young, dated
the date on which the Registration Statement becomes effective
and addressed to Dorado, in form and substance reasonably
satisfactory to Dorado and customary in scope and substance for
letters delivered by independent public accountants in
connection with registration statements similar to the
Registration Statement on
Form S-4.
(b) In connection with the information regarding Dorado and
the Dorado Subsidiaries or the Merger provided by Dorado
specifically for inclusion in, or incorporation by reference
into, the Joint Proxy Statement and the Registration Statement,
Dorado shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause to be
delivered to Redfish a letter of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,
dated the date on which the Registration Statement becomes
effective and addressed to Redfish, in form and substance
reasonably satisfactory to Redfish and customary in scope and
substance for letters delivered by independent public
accountants in connection with registration statements similar
to the Registration Statement on
Form S-4.
A-52
Section 6.18 Financing
Cooperation.
(a) Redfish shall provide, and shall cause the Redfish
Subsidiaries to provide, and shall use its reasonable best
efforts to cause each of its and their respective
representatives, including legal, tax, regulatory and
accounting, to provide, all cooperation reasonably requested by
Dorado
and/or the
Financing Sources in connection with the Financing (provided
that such requested cooperation does not unreasonably interfere
with the ongoing operations of Redfish and the Redfish
Subsidiaries), including, but not limited to:
(i) providing information relating to Redfish and the
Redfish Subsidiaries to the Financing Sources (including
information to be used in the preparation of an information
package regarding the business, operations, financial
projections and prospects of Dorado and Redfish customary for
such financing or reasonably necessary for the completion of the
Financing by the Financing Sources) to the extent reasonably
requested by Dorado to assist in preparation of customary
offering or information documents to be used for the completion
of the Financing as contemplated by the Commitment Letter;
(ii) participating in a reasonable number of meetings,
presentations, due diligence sessions (including accounting due
diligence sessions) and sessions with the rating agencies;
(iii) assisting in the preparation of documents and
materials, including, but not limited to, (A) any customary
offering documents, bank information memoranda, prospectuses and
similar documents (including historical and pro forma financial
statements and information) for any of the Financing, and
(B) materials for rating agency presentations;
(iv) cooperating with the marketing efforts for any of the
Financing (including consenting to the use of Redfishs and
the Redfish Subsidiaries logos; provided that such logos
are used solely in a manner that is not intended to or
reasonably likely to harm or disparage Redfish or the Redfish
Subsidiaries or the reputation or goodwill of Redfish or any of
the Redfish Subsidiaries);
(v) executing and delivering (or using reasonable best
efforts to obtain from its advisors), and causing the Redfish
Subsidiaries to execute and deliver (or use reasonable best
efforts to obtain from its advisors), customary certificates,
accounting comfort letters (including consents of accountants
for use of their reports in any materials relating to the
Financing), legal opinions or other documents and instruments
relating to guarantees and other matters ancillary to the
Financing as may be reasonably requested by Dorado as necessary
and customary in connection with the Financing;
(vi) assisting in (A) the preparation of one or more
credit agreements, currency or interest hedging agreements, or
other agreements or (B) the preparation of one or more
amendments of any of Redfishs or Redfish
Subsidiaries existing credit agreements, currency or
interest hedging agreements, or other agreements, in each case,
on terms satisfactory to Dorado and that are reasonably
requested by Dorado in connection with the Financing; provided
that no obligation of Redfish or any of the Redfish Subsidiaries
under any such agreements or amendments shall be effective until
the Effective Time;
(vii) as promptly as practicable, furnishing Dorado and the
Financing Sources with all financial and other information
regarding Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries as may be
reasonably requested by Dorado
and/or the
Financing Sources to assist in preparation of customary offering
or information documents to be used for the completion of the
Financing as contemplated by the Commitment Letter;
(viii) using its reasonable best efforts, as appropriate,
to have its independent accountants provide their reasonable
cooperation and assistance;
(ix) using its reasonable best efforts to permit any cash
and marketable securities of Redfish and the Redfish
Subsidiaries (other than the MLP and its subsidiaries) to be
made available to the Dorado at the Closing;
(x) providing authorization letters to the Financing
Sources authorizing the distribution of information to
prospective lenders and containing a representation to the
Financing Sources that the public side versions of such
documents, if any, do not include material non-public
information about Redfish or its affiliates or securities;
A-53
(xi) using its reasonable best efforts to ensure that the
Financing Sources benefit from the existing lending
relationships of Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries;
(xii) providing audited consolidated financial statements
of Redfish covering the three (3) fiscal years immediately
preceding the Closing for which audited consolidated financial
statements are currently available, unaudited financial
statements (excluding footnotes) for any interim period or
periods of Redfish ended after the date of the most recent
audited financial statements and at least 45 days prior to
the Closing Date (within 45 days after the end of each such
period); and
(xiii) cooperating reasonably with Dorados Financing
Sources due diligence, to the extent customary and
reasonable and to the extent not unreasonably interfering with
the business of Redfish;
provided, that, until the Effective Time occurs, neither
Redfish nor any of the Redfish Subsidiaries shall:
(1) be required to pay any commitment or other similar fee;
(2) have any liability or any obligation under any credit
agreement or any related document or any other agreement or
document related to the Financing (or alternative financing that
Dorado may raise in connection with the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement); or
(3) be required to incur any other liability in connection
with the Financing (or any alternative financing that Dorado may
raise in connection with the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement) unless reimbursed or indemnified by Dorado to the
reasonable satisfaction of Redfish; provided, further,
that:
(I) all non-public or other confidential information
provided by Redfish or any of its representatives pursuant to
this Section 6.18 shall be kept confidential in accordance
with the Confidentiality Agreements, except that Dorado shall be
permitted to disclose such information to potential syndicate
members during syndication, subject to customary confidentiality
undertakings by such potential syndicate members; and
(II) Redfish shall be permitted a reasonable period to
comment on any documents or other information circulated to
potential financing sources that contain or are based upon any
such non-public or other confidential information.
(b) Dorado (A) shall promptly, upon request by
Redfish, reimburse Redfish for all reasonable out of pocket
costs (including reasonable attorneys fees) incurred by
Redfish, any of the Redfish Subsidiaries or their respective
representatives in connection with the cooperation of Redfish
and the Redfish Subsidiaries and their representatives
contemplated by this Section 6.18, (B) acknowledges
and agrees that Redfish, the Redfish Subsidiaries and their
respective representatives shall not have any responsibility
for, or incur any liability to any person prior to the Effective
Time under, the Financing or any alternative financing that
Dorado may raise in connection with the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement and (C) shall indemnify and
hold harmless Redfish, the Redfish Subsidiaries and their
respective representatives from and against any and all losses,
damages, claims, costs or expenses suffered or incurred by any
of them in connection with the arrangement of the Financing and
any information regarding Dorado used in connection therewith.
ARTICLE VII
Conditions to the Merger
Section 7.1 Conditions
to the Obligations of Each Party to Effect the
Merger. The respective obligations of each party
to effect the Merger shall be subject to the satisfaction, at or
prior to the Closing Date, of each of the following conditions:
(a) Stockholder Approval. Each of
the Redfish Stockholder Approval and the Dorado Stockholder
Approval shall have been obtained.
A-54
(b) HSR Approval. The waiting
period (and any extension thereof) applicable to the
consummation of the Merger under the HSR Act shall have expired
or been terminated.
(c) No Order. No foreign, United
States or state Governmental Authority or court of competent
jurisdiction shall have promulgated, enacted or issued any
statute, rule, regulation, order, decree, injunction or ruling
(whether temporary, preliminary or permanent) which remains in
effect and prohibits, prevents or otherwise enjoins the
consummation of the Merger.
(d) Listing of Dorado Common
Stock. The shares of Dorado Common Stock issuable
to Redfish Stockholders pursuant to this Agreement shall have
been authorized for listing on the National Securities Exchange
upon official notice of issuance.
(e) Effectiveness of Registration
Statement. The Registration Statement shall have
become effective under the Securities Act and shall not be the
subject of any stop order or proceeding seeking a stop order.
Section 7.2 Additional
Conditions to the Obligation of Redfish. Unless
waived by Redfish in accordance with Section 8.5, the
obligation of Redfish to effect the Merger shall be subject to
the fulfillment at or prior to the Closing Date of the following
additional conditions:
(a) Dorado shall have performed in all material respects
all of its covenants required to be performed by it under the
Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date;
(b) (i) the representations and warranties of Dorado
contained in the first sentence of Section 4.1 (Corporate
Organization) and in Sections 4.2 (Organizational
Documents), 4.3 (Capitalization) and 4.4(a) (Authority) shall be
true and correct in all material respects (except for
representations and warranties in any such sections qualified as
to materiality or Dorado Material Adverse Effect, which shall be
true and correct in all respects) at and as of the Closing Date
as though made on or as of the Closing Date (except to the
extent expressly made as of an earlier date, in which case as of
such earlier date) and (ii) the representations and
warranties of Dorado in Article IV of this Agreement other
than those specified in the preceding clause (i) shall be
true and correct (without giving effect to any qualification as
to materiality or Dorado Material Adverse Effect) at and as of
the Closing Date as though made on or as of the Closing Date
(except to the extent expressly made as of an earlier date, in
which case as of such earlier date), except, with respect to the
representations and warranties referred to in this clause (ii),
where the failure of any such representations and warranties to
be so true and correct (without giving effect to any
qualification as to materiality or Dorado Material Adverse
Effect) would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a
Dorado Material Adverse Effect;
(c) Redfish shall have received a certificate signed on
behalf of Dorado by an executive officer of Dorado to the effect
that the conditions in clauses (a) and (b) of this
Section 7.2 above have been satisfied;
(d) Redfish shall have received an opinion (reasonably
acceptable in form and substance to Redfish) from Baker Botts
L.L.P., dated as of the Closing Date, to the effect that for
federal income tax purposes (i) the Merger will be treated
as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of
the Code and (ii) each of Dorado and Redfish will be a
party to such reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(b) of the Code, and that opinion shall not have
been withdrawn, revoked or modified; that opinion will be based
upon representations of the Parties contained in this Agreement
and in the tax representation letters described in
Section 6.16; and
(e) From the date of this Agreement through the Closing,
there shall not have occurred any change in the condition
(financial or otherwise), operations, business or properties of
Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries that constitutes or is
reasonably likely to constitute a Dorado Material Adverse Effect.
A-55
Section 7.3 Additional
Conditions to the Obligations of Dorado. Unless
waived by Dorado in accordance with Section 8.5, the
obligation of Dorado to effect the Merger shall be subject to
the fulfillment at or prior to the Closing Date of the following
additional conditions:
(a) (i) the representations and warranties of Redfish
contained in the first, second and fourth sentences of
Section 3.1 (Organization and Qualification; Subsidiaries)
and in Sections 3.2 (Organizational Documents), 3.3
(Capitalization), 3.4(a) (Authority), 3.25 (State Takeover Laws)
and 3.26 (Rights Agreement) shall be true and correct in all
material respects (except for representations and warranties in
any such sections qualified as to materiality or a Redfish
Material Adverse Effect, which shall be true and correct in all
respects) at and as of the Closing Date as though made on or as
of the Closing Date (except to the extent expressly made as of
an earlier date, in which case as of such earlier date) and
(ii) the representations and warranties of Redfish in
Article III of this Agreement other than those specified in
the preceding clause (i) shall be true and correct (without
giving effect to any qualification as to materiality or a
Redfish Material Adverse Effect) at and as of the Closing Date
as though made on or as of the Closing Date (except to the
extent expressly made as of an earlier date, in which case as of
such earlier date), except, with respect to the representations
and warranties referred to in this clause (ii), where the
failure of any such representations and warranties to be so true
and correct (without giving effect to any qualification as to
materiality or a Redfish Material Adverse Effect) would not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Redfish Material
Adverse Effect;
(b) Redfish shall have performed in all material respects
all of its covenants required to be performed by it under this
Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date;
(c) Dorado shall have received a certificate signed on
behalf of Redfish by an executive officer of Redfish to the
effect that the conditions in clauses (a) and (b) of
this Section 7.3 above have been satisfied;
(d) Dorado shall have received an opinion (reasonably
acceptable in form and substance to Dorado) from
Baker & Hostetler LLP, dated as of the Closing Date,
to the effect that for federal income tax purposes (i) the
Merger will be treated as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code and (ii) each of Dorado and
Redfish will be a party to such reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code, and that opinion
shall not have been withdrawn, revoked or modified; that opinion
will be based upon representations of the Parties contained in
this Agreement and in the tax representation letters described
in Section 6.16; and
(e) From the date of this Agreement through the Closing,
there shall not have occurred any change in the condition
(financial or otherwise), operations, business or properties of
Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries that constitutes or is
reasonably likely to constitute a Redfish Material Adverse
Effect.
(f) Dorado shall have received the Financing or the
Alternate Financing pursuant to the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement, but this condition will be considered satisfied
if the applicable lenders failure to make the Financing or
the Alternate Financing available is a result of a breach by
Dorado of any of its obligations under this Agreement.
ARTICLE VIII
Termination, Amendment and Waiver
Section 8.1 Termination. This
Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at
any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after
receipt of the Redfish Stockholder Approval:
(a) by mutual written agreement of Dorado and
Redfish; or
(b) by Dorado or Redfish, if:
(i) the Merger shall not have been consummated on or before
May 31, 2010 (the Outside Date);
provided, however, that neither Dorado, on the one hand, nor
Redfish, on the other hand, shall be entitled to terminate this
Agreement under this clause (b)(i) if such partys breach
of any
A-56
provision of this Agreement has contributed to, or otherwise
resulted in, the failure of the Merger to occur on or before the
Outside Date; or
(ii) a court of competent jurisdiction or other
Governmental Authority shall have issued a final, non-appealable
order, decree or ruling permanently restraining, enjoining or
otherwise prohibiting the Merger; provided, that the
party seeking to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this
clause (b)(ii) shall have complied in all material respects with
its obligations in Section 6.6; or
(iii) this Agreement shall not have been adopted by
Redfishs stockholders by reason of the failure to obtain
the requisite Redfish Stockholder Approval at the Redfish
Stockholders Meeting; provided, however, that the right
to terminate this Agreement under this Section 8.1(b)(iii)
shall not be available to Redfish where the failure to obtain
the Redfish Stockholder Approval shall have been caused by the
action or failure to act of Redfish and such action or failure
to act constitutes a material breach by Redfish of this
Agreement; or
(iv) this Agreement shall not have been adopted by
Dorados stockholders by reason of the failure to obtain
the requisite Dorado Stockholder Approval at the Dorado
Stockholders Meeting; provided, however, that the right
to terminate this Agreement under this Section 8.1(b)(iv)
shall not be available to Dorado where the failure to obtain the
Dorado Stockholder Approval shall have been caused by the action
or failure to act of Dorado and such action or failure to act
constitutes a material breach by Dorado of this
Agreement; or
(v) the condition set forth in Section 7.3(f) is not
satisfied on or before the Outside Date; or
(c) by Dorado if Redfish shall have materially breached any
of its representations or warranties in this Agreement or
materially failed to perform any of its covenants in this
Agreement such that the conditions set forth in
Section 7.3(a) or 7.3(b) are not capable of being
satisfied, and such breach or failure to perform has not been
cured or waived prior to the earlier of (A) 30 days
following notice of such breach or failure to Redfish and
(B) the Outside Date; provided, that Dorado shall
have no right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this
clause (c) if Dorado is then in material breach of any of
its representations or warranties in this Agreement or has
failed to perform in any material respect any of its covenants
in this Agreement; or
(d) by Redfish, if:
(i) Dorado shall have materially breached any of its
representations or warranties in this Agreement or materially
failed to perform any of its covenants in this Agreement such
that the conditions set forth in Section 7.2(a) and 7.2(b)
are not capable of being satisfied, and such breach or failure
to perform shall not have been cured or waived prior to the
earlier of (A) 30 days following notice of such breach
or failure to Dorado and (B) the Outside Date;
provided, that Redfish shall not have the right to
terminate this Agreement pursuant to this clause (d)(i) if
Redfish is then in material breach of any of its representations
or warranties in this Agreement or has failed to perform in any
material respect any of its covenants in this Agreement; or
(ii) prior to obtaining the Redfish Stockholder Approval,
the Redfish Board of Directors shall have effected a Redfish
Adverse Recommendation Change and authorized Redfish to enter
into a binding definitive agreement in respect of a Superior
Proposal.
Section 8.2 Effect
of Termination. In the event that the Effective
Time does not occur as a result of any party hereto exercising
its rights to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this
Article VIII, then this Agreement shall be null and void
and, except as provided in Sections 8.3 and 9.1 or as
otherwise expressly provided herein, no party shall have any
rights or obligations under this Agreement, except that nothing
herein shall relieve any party from liability for any wrongful
failure or refusal to perform or observe in any material respect
any agreement or covenant contained herein. In the event the
termination of this Agreement results from the wrongful failure
or refusal of any party to perform in any material respect any
agreement or covenant herein, then the other party shall be
entitled to all remedies available at law or in equity and shall
be entitled to recover court costs and reasonable
attorneys fees in addition to any other relief to which
such party may be
A-57
entitled. In the event that a party wrongfully terminates or
repudiates this Agreement or wrongfully fails to consummate the
Merger, the remedies available to the other party in equity
shall include specific performance as set forth in
Section 9.8 of this Agreement and such other remedies as
may be available to the other party at law.
Section 8.3 Fees
and Expenses.
(a) (i) If this Agreement is terminated by Redfish
pursuant to Section 8.1(d)(ii), Redfish shall pay Dorado a
fee of $120 million. Redfish shall pay that amount in cash
by wire transfer (to an account designated in writing by Dorado)
in immediately available funds not later than two business days
after the occurrence of that termination.
(ii) If this Agreement is terminated by either Redfish or
Dorado pursuant to Section 8.1(b)(iii), Redfish shall pay
to Dorado a fee of $60 million. Redfish shall pay that
amount in cash by wire transfer (to an account designated in
writing by Dorado) in immediately available funds not later than
two business days after the occurrence of that termination.
(iii) If this Agreement is terminated pursuant to Section
8.1(b)(iv), Dorado shall pay to Redfish a fee of
$60 million. Dorado shall pay that amount in cash by wire
transfer (to an account designated in writing by Redfish) in
immediately available funds not later than two business days
after the occurrence of that termination.
(b) (i) If (x) either Dorado or Redfish
terminates this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(b)(iii),
(y) at the time of the Redfish Stockholders Meeting there
has been publicly announced or disclosed a bona fide Acquisition
Proposal for Redfish (but any reference in the definition of
Acquisition Proposal to 15% will be deemed to be a reference to
50% for the purpose of all uses of such term in this clause (b))
that has not been withdrawn prior to the fifth business day
preceding the Redfish Stockholders Meeting and (z) within
12 months after the date of the Redfish Stockholders
Meeting, a transaction constituting an Acquisition Proposal for
Redfish is consummated or Redfish enters into an agreement with
respect to a transaction constituting an Acquisition Proposal
for Redfish that is consummated, then Redfish shall pay Dorado a
fee of $120 million in cash by wire transfer of immediately
available funds not later than two business days following the
consummation of such transaction.
(ii) If (x) Dorado terminates this Agreement pursuant
to Section 8.1(c) or has the right, at the time, to
terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(b)(i)
(other than by failure of the condition set forth in
Section 7.3(f)) (irrespective of whether Redfish is the
terminating party pursuant to Section 8.1(b)(i)),
(y) at the time of that termination there has been publicly
announced or disclosed a bona fide Acquisition Proposal for
Redfish that has not been withdrawn prior to such termination
(or, in the case of such termination pursuant to
Section 8.1(b)(i), prior to the fifth business day
preceding that termination) and (z) within 12 months
after the date of that termination, a transaction constituting
an Acquisition Proposal for Redfish is consummated or Redfish
enters into an agreement with respect to a transaction
constituting an Acquisition Proposal for Redfish that is
consummated, then Redfish shall pay Dorado a fee of
$120 million in cash by wire transfer of immediately
available funds not later than two business days following the
consummation of that transaction.
(c) (i) If (x) either Redfish or Dorado
terminates this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(b)(iv),
(y) Dorado does not at the time of the Dorado Stockholder
Meeting have a right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to
Section 8.1(c), 8.1(b)(ii) or 8.1(b)(iii) and (z) as
of the second business day prior to the date on which the Dorado
Stockholder Meeting is held (the Determination
Date), either (a) Dorado has not entered into
binding definitive agreements for the Financing or the Alternate
Financing or (b) Dorado has entered into definitive
agreements for the Financing or the Alternate Financing but one
or more conditions to the obligations of the lenders to
consummate the Financing or Alternate Financing under such
definitive agreements on the Closing Date shall not have been
satisfied or waived (other than conditions that, by their
nature, can be satisfied only at the Closing but which
conditions would be satisfied if the Closing Date were the
Determination Date), and Dorado has failed, in the public
announcement required pursuant to Section 6.11(d),
(A) to publicly announce that it has received a letter from
the Financing Sources or the
A-58
sources of Alternative Financing confirming their expectation
that the Funds will be made available by the Outside Date, or
(B) to reaffirm publicly the affirmations set forth in the
next-to-last sentence of Section 4.27 hereof, then Dorado
shall pay Redfish a fee of $300 million (the
Financing Termination Fee) in cash by wire
transfer (to an account designated in writing by Redfish) in
immediately available funds not later than two business days
after the occurrence of that termination.
(ii) If (x) either Redfish or Dorado terminates this
Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(b)(i), and all of the
conditions to Closing set forth in Article VII have been
satisfied or waived on or prior to the date of such termination
(other than the condition set forth in Section 7.3(f) and
conditions that, by their nature, can be satisfied only at the
Closing but which conditions would be satisfied if the Closing
Date were the date of such termination), or (y) either
Redfish or Dorado terminates this Agreement pursuant to
Section 8.1(b)(v), then Dorado shall pay Redfish the
Financing Termination Fee in cash by wire transfer (to an
account designated in writing by Redfish) in immediately
available funds not later than two business days after the
occurrence of that termination.
(iii) Redfish agrees that in the event that the Financing
Termination Fee is paid to Redfish pursuant to
Section 8.3(c)(i) or 8.3(c)(ii), the payment of such
Financing Termination Fee shall be the sole and exclusive remedy
of Redfish, the Redfish Subsidiaries and their respective
stockholders, affiliates, officers, directors, employees or
representatives against Dorado or any of its representatives,
including any investment banker, financial advisor, Financing
Source, attorney, accountant or other advisor, agent,
representative or affiliate for, and in no such event will
Redfish seek to recover any other money damages or seek any
other remedy based on a claim in law or equity with respect to,
(w) any loss suffered as a result of the failure of the
Merger to be consummated, (x) the termination of this
Agreement, (y) any liabilities or obligations arising under
this Agreement, or (z) any claims or actions arising out of
or relating to any breach, termination or failure of or under
this Agreement, in each case, with respect to a termination of
this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.3(c)(i) or 8.3(c)(ii). Upon
payment to Redfish of the Financing Termination Fee, none of
Dorado or any of its representatives, including any investment
banker, financial advisor, Financing Source, attorney,
accountant or other advisor, agent or representative or any of
its affiliates shall have any further liability or obligation to
Redfish relating to or arising out of this Agreement or the
transactions contemplated hereby (except that Dorado shall also
be obligated with respect to the provisions of
Section 6.2(c) and Section 6.18(b)).
(d) (i) If (x) either Dorado or Redfish
terminates this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(b)(iv),
(y) at the time of the Dorado Stockholders Meeting there
has been publicly announced or disclosed a bona fide Acquisition
Proposal for Dorado (but any reference in the definition of
Acquisition Proposal to 15% will be deemed to be a reference to
50% for the purpose of all uses of such term in this clause (d))
that has not been withdrawn prior to the fifth business day
preceding the Dorado Stockholders Meeting and (z) within
12 months after the date of the Dorado Stockholders
Meeting, a transaction constituting an Acquisition Proposal for
Dorado is consummated or Dorado enters into an agreement with
respect to a transaction constituting an Acquisition Proposal
for Dorado that is consummated, then Dorado shall pay Redfish a
fee of $120 million in cash by wire transfer of immediately
available funds not later than two business days following the
consummation of such transaction.
(ii) If (w) Redfish terminates this Agreement pursuant
to Section 8.1(d)(i) or has the right, at the time, to
terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(b)(i)
(irrespective of whether Dorado is the terminating party
pursuant to Section 8.1(b)(i)), (x) at the time of
that termination there has been publicly announced or disclosed
a bona fide Acquisition Proposal for Dorado that has not been
withdrawn prior to such termination (or, in the case of such
termination pursuant to Section 8.1(b)(i), prior to the
fifth business day preceding that termination), (y) within
12 months after the date of that termination, a transaction
constituting an Acquisition Proposal for Dorado is consummated
by Dorado or Dorado enters into an agreement with respect to a
transaction constituting an Acquisition Proposal for Dorado that
is consummated, and (z) Redfish does not receive a
Financing Termination Fee from Dorado, then Dorado shall pay
Redfish a fee of $120 million in cash by wire transfer of
immediately available funds not later than two business days
following the consummation of that transaction.
A-59
(e) In the event that more than one termination fee is
payable to a party under this Section 8.3, then the amount
of any subsequent termination fee shall be reduced by the amount
of all termination fees previously paid to such party under this
Section 8.3.
(f) Each party hereto is responsible for all costs and
expenses incurred by it in connection with this Agreement and
the Merger, whether or not the Merger is consummated, except
that each of Dorado and Redfish shall pay half of the filing
fees for the Notification and Report Form pursuant to the HSR
Act and except that on a termination of this Agreement pursuant
to (x) Section 8.1(c) or 8.1(d)(ii) or
(y) Section 8.1(b)(i) or 8.1(b)(iii), if in the case
of this clause (y) the event of Section 8.3(b)(i) has
also occurred, and in the case of clauses (x) and
(y) of this Section 8.3(f) a fee would not otherwise
be payable under this Article VIII, Redfish shall reimburse
Dorado for the Expenses (as hereafter defined) in cash by wire
transfer of immediately available funds not later than two
business days after delivery by Dorado to Redfish of an
itemization prepared in good faith setting forth in reasonable
detail all Expenses, which itemization must be delivered within
10 business days following termination (and may be supplemented
and updated from time to time until the 60th day after
termination, upon which event Redfish shall make an additional
reimbursement to Dorado). As used herein,
Expenses means all reasonable out-of-pocket
documented fees and expenses (including all fees and expenses of
counsel, accountants, consultants, financial advisors and
investment bankers of Dorado and its affiliates), up to
$10 million in the aggregate, incurred by Dorado and its
affiliates or on their behalf in connection with or related to
the authorization, preparation, negotiation, execution and
performance of this Agreement and the Financing and all other
matters related to the Merger. Any amount payable under this
Section 8.3(f) shall be credited against any other amount
payable under this Section 8.3 based, in whole or in part,
on the same state of facts.
Section 8.4 Amendment. This
Agreement may be amended by the parties hereto by action taken
by or on behalf of their respective Boards of Directors at any
time prior to the Effective Time whether before or after Redfish
Stockholder Approval is obtained; provided, however, that
after Redfish Stockholder Approval is obtained, no amendment may
be made that by law, requires further approval by stockholders
unless such further approval is first obtained. This Agreement
may not be amended except by an instrument in writing signed by
the parties hereto.
Section 8.5 Waiver. At
any time prior to the Effective Time, any party hereto may
(a) extend the time for the performance of any obligation
or other act of any other party hereto, (b) waive any
inaccuracy in the representations and warranties contained
herein or in any document delivered pursuant hereto and
(c) waive compliance with any agreement or condition
contained herein. Any such extension or waiver shall be valid if
set forth in an instrument in writing signed by the party or
parties to be bound thereby.
ARTICLE IX
General Provisions
Section 9.1 Survival. The
agreements in Articles I and VIII and Sections 6.4 and
6.8 of this Agreement shall survive the Effective Time
indefinitely. The agreements made by the parties in this
Article IX and in Sections 6.2(c), 6.18(b), 8.2 and
8.3 of this Agreement shall survive termination indefinitely.
The remainder of the representations, warranties, covenants and
agreements in this Agreement or in any schedule, exhibit,
instrument or other document delivered pursuant to this
Agreement shall terminate at the Effective Time or upon
termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1.
Section 9.2 Scope
of Representations and Warranties.
(a) Except as and to the extent expressly set forth in this
Agreement, Redfish is not making, and disclaims, any,
representations or warranties whatsoever, whether express or
implied. Redfish disclaims all liability or responsibility for
any other statement or information made or communicated (orally
or in writing) to Dorado, its affiliates or any stockholder,
officer, director, employee, representative, consultant,
attorney, agent, lender or other advisor Dorado or its
affiliates (including, but not limited to, any opinion,
information or advice which may have been provided to any such
person by any representative of Redfish or any other person or
contained in the files or records of Redfish), wherever and
however made, including any documents,
A-60
projections, forecasts, estimates or other material made
available to Dorado or any affiliate, officer, director,
employee, representative, consultant, attorney, agent, lender or
other advisor of Dorado in any offering memorandum, data
room or management presentation.
(b) Except as and to the extent expressly set forth in this
Agreement, Dorado is not making, and disclaims, any
representations or warranties whatsoever, whether express or
implied. Dorado disclaims all liability and responsibility for
any other statement or information made or communicated (orally
or in writing) to Redfish, its affiliates or any stockholder,
officer, director, employee, representative, consultant,
attorney, agent, lender or other advisor of Redfish or its
affiliates (including, but not limited to, any opinion,
information or advice which may have been provided to any such
person by any representative of Dorado or any other person),
wherever and however made, including any documents, projections,
forecasts, estimates or other material made available to
Redfish, any Redfish Subsidiary or any affiliate, officer,
director, employee, representative, consultant, attorney, agent,
lender or other advisor of Redfish or any Redfish Subsidiary in
any offering memorandum, data room or management
presentation.
(c) Any representation to the knowledge of a
party or phrases of similar wording shall be limited to matters
within the actual conscious awareness of the executive officers
of such party and any manager or managers of such party who have
primary responsibility for the substantive area or operations in
question and who report directly to such executive officers.
Section 9.3 Notices. All
notices, requests, claims, demands and other communications
hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given (and shall be
deemed to have been duly given upon receipt) by delivery in
person, by facsimile or by registered or certified mail (postage
prepaid, return receipt requested) to the respective parties at
the following addresses (or at such other address for a party as
shall be specified in a notice given in accordance with this
Section 9.3):
if to Dorado:
Denbury Resources Inc.
5100 Tennyson, Suite 1200
Plano, TX 75024
Attention: Phil Rykhoek, Chief Executive Officer
Telephone:
(972) 673-2050
Fax:
(972) 673-2051
E-mail:
phil.rykhoek@denbury.com
with a copy, which shall not constitute notice, to:
Baker & Hostetler LLP
1000 Louisiana, Suite 2000
Houston, TX 77002
Attention: Donald W. Brodsky
Telephone:
(713) 646-1335
Fax:
(713) 751-1717
E-mail: dbrodsky@bakerlaw.com
A-61
if to Redfish:
Encore Acquisition Company
777 Main Street, Suite 1400
Forth Worth, TX 76102
Attention: Jon S. Brumley, President and Chief Executive
Officer
Telephone:
(817) 339-0902
Fax:
(817) 339-0859
E-mail:
jsbrumley@encoreacq.com
with a copy, which shall not constitute notice, to:
Baker Botts L.L.P.
One Shell Plaza
910 Louisiana
Houston, Texas
77002-4995
Attention: Sean T. Wheeler
Stephen A. Massad
Telephone:
(713) 229-1234
Fax: (713)
229-1522
E-mail:
sean.wheeler@bakerbotts.com
stephen.massad@bakerbotts.com
Section 9.4 Certain
Definitions. For purposes of this Agreement:
(a) affiliate of a specified person
means a person who directly or indirectly through one or more
intermediaries controls, is controlled by, or is under common
control with, such specified person.
(b) a person shall be the beneficial
owner of shares of Redfish Common Stock (i) which
such person or any of its affiliates or associates (as such term
is defined in
Rule 12b-2
promulgated under the Exchange Act) beneficially owns, directly
or indirectly, (ii) which such person or any of its
affiliates or associates has, directly or indirectly, whether or
not of record, (A) the right to acquire (whether such right
is exercisable immediately or subject only to the passage of
time), pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or understanding
or upon the exercise of conversion rights, exchange rights,
warrants or options, or otherwise, or (B) the right to vote
pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or understanding or
(iii) which are beneficially owned, directly or indirectly,
by any other persons with whom such person or any of its
affiliates or associates or person with whom such person or any
of its affiliates or associates has any agreement, arrangement
or understanding for the purpose of acquiring, holding, voting
or disposing of any shares of Redfish Common Stock.
(c) business day means any day on which
the principal offices of the SEC in Washington, D.C. are
open to accept filings, or, in the case of determining a date
when any payment is due, any weekday other than Saturday or
Sunday on which banking institutions in New York, New York are
required to be open.
(d) Change of Law shall mean the
adoption, implementation, promulgation, repeal, modification,
reinterpretation or proposal of any law, rule, regulation,
ordinance, order, protocol, practice or measure or any other
Requirement of Law of or by any foreign, federal, state, county
or local government, governmental agency, court, commission or
department or any other entity which occurs subsequent to the
date hereof.
(e) control (including the terms
controlled by and under common
control with) means the possession, directly or
indirectly or as trustee or executor, of the power to direct or
cause the direction of the management and policies of a person,
whether through the ownership of voting securities, as trustee
or executor, by contract or credit arrangement or otherwise.
(f) Governmental Authority means any
(a) nation, state, county, city, town, village, district,
or other jurisdiction of any nature; (b) federal, state,
local, municipal, foreign, or other government,
A-62
(c) governmental or quasi-governmental authority of any
nature (including any governmental agency, branch, department,
official, or entity and any court or other tribunal);
(d) multinational organization or body; or (e) body
exercising, or entitled to exercise, any administrative,
executive, judicial, legislative, police, regulatory, or taxing
authority or power of any nature.
(g) National Securities Exchange means
the primary registered national securities exchange (as
described in Section 6 of the Exchange Act) on which the
shares of Dorado Common Stock are traded.
(h) Dorado Material Adverse Effect means
any change or event that is materially adverse to the business,
results of operations or financial condition of Dorado and the
Dorado Subsidiaries taken as a whole, except for any of the
following or any such change, event or effect resulting or
arising therefrom: (i) general economic, financial market,
regulatory or political conditions, any outbreak of hostilities
or war, acts of terrorism, natural disasters or other force
majeure events, in each case in the United States or
elsewhere, (ii) changes in or events or conditions
generally affecting the oil and natural gas industry or
exploration and production companies, (iii) changes in oil
and natural gas prices, including changes in price
differentials, (iv) changes in other commodity prices,
(v) any Change of Law or changes to GAAP or interpretations
thereof, (vi) the negotiation, execution, announcement or
pendency of this Agreement, any actions taken in compliance with
this Agreement or the consummation of the Merger, (vii) any
failure by Dorado to meet any published estimates or
expectations of Dorados revenues, earnings, cash flows,
drilling results or production for any period, or any failure by
Dorado to meet its internal budgets, plans, forecasts or
estimates of its revenues, earnings, cash flows, drilling
results or production for any period, (viii) changes in the
estimates of oil or natural gas reserves of Dorado or any Dorado
Subsidiary, (ix) the accounting for Dorados hedging
activities, and any mark-to-market gains or losses with respect
to such hedges, (x) fluctuations in currency exchange
rates, (xi) the downgrade in rating of any debt or debt
securities of Dorado or any of its affiliates, (xii) the
filing, defense or settlement of any legal proceedings made or
brought by any of the current or former stockholders of Dorado
(on their own behalf or on behalf of Dorado) arising out of or
related to this Agreement or the Merger, (xiii) the failure
to take action as a result of any restrictions or prohibitions
set forth in Section 5.2 of this Agreement with respect to
which Redfish has refused, following Dorados written
request, to provide a waiver in a timely manner or at all, or
(xiv) changes in the price or trading volume of
Dorados Common Stock, except that clauses (i) or
(ii) shall not prevent a determination that there has been
a Dorado Material Adverse Effect if the change or event referred
to therein affects Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries taken as a
whole disproportionately relative to other industry participants
(provided that such change or event may be considered only to
the extent of such disproportionate impact), and except that
none of clause (vii), clause (xi) or clause (xiv)
shall prevent a determination that any underlying causes of such
changes resulted in a Dorado Material Adverse Effect. All
references to Dorado Material Adverse Effect contained in this
Agreement shall be deemed to refer solely to the business or
financial condition of Dorado and the Dorado Subsidiaries, taken
as a whole, without including its ownership of Redfish and the
Redfish Subsidiaries after giving effect to the Transactions.
(i) Permitted Encumbrances means:
(i) to the extent waived prior to Closing, preferential
purchase rights and rights of first refusal;
(ii) inchoate mechanics and materialmens liens
for amounts not yet delinquent and liens for Taxes or
assessments that are not yet delinquent or, in all instances, if
delinquent, that are being contested in good faith in the
ordinary course of business and for which adequate reserves have
been established by the party responsible for payment thereof;
(iii) liens arising under operating agreements or sales,
processing, gathering, storage and transportation contracts
securing amounts not yet delinquent, or if delinquent, that are
being contested in good faith in the ordinary course of business
and for which adequate reserves have been established by the
party responsible for payment thereof;
A-63
(iv) easements, rights-of-way, servitudes, permits, surface
leases and other rights in respect of surface operations, to the
extent (a) shown of record in the jurisdiction where
located and (b) each is valid and enforceable in accordance
with the terms thereof;
(v) such title defects as Dorado may have expressly waived
in writing as set forth on Schedule 9.4(i) attached hereto;
(vi) rights reserved to or vested in any governmental,
statutory, municipal or public authority to control or regulate
any of Redfishs or any Redfish Subsidiarys
properties or assets in any manner and all applicable laws,
rules and orders of any Governmental Authority; and
(vii) all other liens, charges, encumbrances, defects and
irregularities that are not such as to materially interfere with
the operation, value or use of the property or asset affected.
(j) person means an individual,
corporation, limited liability company, partnership, limited
partnership, syndicate, person (including, without limitation, a
person as defined in Section 13(d)(3) of the
Exchange Act), trust, association or entity or Governmental
Authority, political subdivision, agency or instrumentality of a
government.
(k) Redfish Material Adverse Effect
means any change or event that is materially adverse to the
business, results of operations or financial condition of
Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries taken as a whole, except
for any of the following or any such change, event or effect
resulting or arising therefrom: (i) general economic,
financial market, regulatory or political conditions, any
outbreak of hostilities or war, acts of terrorism, natural
disasters or other force majeure events, in each case in
the United States or elsewhere, (ii) changes in or events
or conditions generally affecting the oil and natural gas
industry or exploration and production companies,
(iii) changes in oil and natural gas prices, including
changes in price differentials, (iv) changes in other
commodity prices, (v) any Change of Law or changes to GAAP
or interpretations thereof, (vi) the negotiation,
execution, announcement or pendency of this Agreement, any
actions taken in compliance with this Agreement or the
consummation of the Merger, (vii) any failure by Redfish to
meet any published estimates or expectations of Redfishs
revenues, earnings, cash flows, drilling results or production
for any period, or any failure by Redfish to meet its internal
budgets, plans, forecasts or estimates of its revenues,
earnings, cash flows, drilling results or production for any
period, (viii) changes in the estimates of oil or natural
gas reserves of Redfish or any Redfish Subsidiary, (ix) the
accounting for Redfishs hedging activities, and any
mark-to-market gains or losses with respect to such hedges,
(x) fluctuations in currency exchange rates, (xi) the
downgrade in rating of any debt or debt securities of Redfish or
any of its affiliates, (xii) the filing, defense or
settlement of any legal proceedings made or brought by any of
the current or former stockholders of Redfish (on their own
behalf or on behalf of Redfish) arising out of or related to
this Agreement or the Merger, (xiii) the failure to take
action as a result of any restrictions or prohibitions set forth
in Section 5.1 of this Agreement with respect to which
Dorado has refused, following Redfishs written request, to
provide a waiver in a timely manner or at all, or
(xiv) changes in the price or trading volume of
Redfishs Common Stock, except that clauses (i) or
(ii) shall not prevent a determination that there has been
a Redfish Material Adverse Effect if the change or event
referred to therein affects Redfish and the Redfish Subsidiaries
taken as a whole disproportionately relative to other industry
participants (provided that such change or event may be
considered only to the extent of such disproportionate impact),
and except that none of clause (vii), clause (xi) or
clause (xiv) shall prevent a determination that any
underlying causes of such changes resulted in a Redfish Material
Adverse Effect.
(l) Requirement of Law shall mean any
foreign, federal, state, county or local laws, statutes,
regulations, rules, codes or ordinances enacted, adopted, issued
or promulgated by any Governmental Authority.
(m) subsidiary or
subsidiaries of any person means an affiliate
controlled by such person, directly or indirectly, through one
or more intermediaries; provided, however, that the MLP
General Partner and its subsidiaries, and the MLP and its
subsidiaries, shall be deemed Redfish Subsidiaries solely for
purposes of (i) the representations and warranties of
Redfish contained in Article III and the
A-64
agreements contained in Article V and Sections 6.2(a)
and 6.3, and (ii) the definition of Redfish Material
Adverse Effect and not for any other purposes under this
Agreement; provided, further, however, that Genesis
Energy, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Genesis
Energy, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, or any subsidiary
thereof, shall not be deemed to be a subsidiary of Dorado. For
the purpose of clarification, except as provided in this
Section 9.4(m), no covenant in this Agreement that would
require any action or inaction on the part of any Redfish
Subsidiary or affiliate of Redfish shall be construed to require
the MLP General Partner (including in its capacity as general
partner of the MLP), the MLP or any subsidiary of the MLP
General Partner or the MLP to take or refrain from taking any
such action.
Section 9.5 Severability. If
any term or other provision of this Agreement is invalid,
illegal or incapable of being enforced by any rule of law or
public policy, all other conditions and provisions of this
Agreement shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect so
long as the economic or legal substance of the transactions
contemplated hereby is not affected in any manner materially
adverse to any party. Upon such determination that any term or
other provision is invalid, illegal or incapable of being
enforced, the parties hereto shall negotiate in good faith to
modify this Agreement so as to effect the original intent of the
parties as closely as possible in a mutually acceptable manner
in order that the transactions contemplated hereby be
consummated as originally contemplated to the fullest extent
possible.
Section 9.6 Entire
Agreement; Assignment. This Agreement, including
Annex A, and the Schedules and Exhibits hereto, constitutes
the entire agreement among the parties with respect to the
subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements and
undertakings, both written and oral, among the parties, or any
of them, with respect to the subject matter hereof, except that
the Confidentiality Agreements shall remain in full force and
effect. Neither this Agreement nor any of any partys
rights or obligations hereunder shall be assigned by operation
of law or otherwise.
Section 9.7 Parties
in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon
and inure solely to the benefit of each party hereto, and
nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to or
shall confer upon any other person any right, benefit or remedy
of any nature whatsoever under or by reason of this Agreement,
other than Sections 2.1 (from and after the Effective
Time), 6.4 and 6.9 (which are intended to be for the benefit of
the persons covered thereby and may be enforced by such persons)
and except for (i) the rights of holders of Redfish Common
Stock to enforce their rights to receive the Merger
Consideration in accordance with Article II upon
consummation of the Merger in the event the Merger is
consummated and (ii) the rights of the Financing Sources to
enforce their rights under Section 8.3(c)(iii) and
Section 9.9.
Section 9.8 Specific
Performance. The parties agree that irreparable
damage would occur in the event that any of the provisions of
this Agreement were not performed in accordance with its
specific terms or were otherwise breached. Each party agrees
that, in the event of any breach or threatened breach by any
other party of any covenant or obligation contained in this
Agreement, the non-breaching party shall be entitled (in
addition to any other remedy that may be available to it,
including monetary damages) to seek and obtain (a) a decree
or order of specific performance to enforce the observance and
performance of such covenant or obligation, and (b) an
injunction restraining such breach or threatened breach. Each
party further agrees that no other party hereto or any other
person shall be required to obtain, furnish or post any bond or
similar instrument in connection with or as a condition to
obtaining any remedy referred to in this Section 9.8, and
each party hereto irrevocably waives any right it may have to
require the obtaining, furnishing or posting of any such bond or
similar instrument. Each party further agrees that it shall not
object to the granting of an order of specific performance, an
injunction or other equitable relief on the basis that there
exists an adequate remedy at law.
Section 9.9 Governing
Law; Jurisdiction and Venue. This Agreement shall
be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of
the State of Delaware applicable to contracts executed in and to
be performed in that state. All actions and proceedings arising
out of or relating to this Agreement shall be heard and
determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery or a federal
district court located in Delaware. Each of Redfish and Dorado
hereby irrevocably and unconditionally consents to submit to the
exclusive jurisdiction of the Delaware Court of Chancery or a
federal district court located in Delaware for any litigation
arising out of
A-65
or relating to this Agreement and the transactions contemplated
hereby (and agrees not to commence any litigation relating
thereto except in such court), waives any objection to the
laying of venue of any such litigation in the Delaware Court of
Chancery or a federal district court located in Delaware, agrees
not to plead or claim that such litigation brought therein has
been brought in any inconvenient forum and consent to service of
process in such action being given in accordance with the notice
provisions hereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each of the
parties hereto agrees that it will not bring or support any
action, cause of action, claim, cross-claim or third-party claim
of any kind or description, whether in law or in equity, whether
in contract or in tort or otherwise, against the Financing
Sources in any way relating to this Agreement or any of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including but not
limited to any dispute arising out of or relating in any way to
the Commitment Letter or the performance thereof, in any forum
other than the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of
New York, or, if under applicable law exclusive jurisdiction is
vested in the federal courts, the United States District Court
for the Southern District of New York (and appellate courts
thereof).
Section 9.10 Waiver
of Jury Trial. EACH OF DORADO AND REDFISH HEREBY
IRREVOCABLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, ALL
RIGHTS OF TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION, PROCEEDING, OR
COUNTERCLAIM (WHETHER BASED UPON CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE)
ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, THE MERGER OR ANY
OF THE OTHER TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.
Section 9.11 Headings. The
descriptive headings contained in this Agreement are included
for convenience of reference only and shall not affect in any
way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
Section 9.12 Interpretation.
(a) When a reference is made in this Agreement to Articles,
Sections, Exhibits or Schedules, such reference shall be to an
Article or Section of or Exhibit or Schedule to this Agreement
unless otherwise indicated. Whenever the words
include, includes or
including are used in this Agreement, they shall be
deemed to be followed by the words without
limitation. The words hereby,
herein, hereof or hereunder,
and similar terms are to be deemed to refer to this Agreement as
a whole and not to any specific section. The inclusion of any
information in Redfishs Schedules or Dorados
Schedules to this Agreement (shall not be deemed an admission or
acknowledgment, solely by virtue of the inclusion of such
information therein, that such information is required to be
included therein or material to Redfish or any Redfish
Subsidiary or to Dorado or any Dorado Subsidiary, as applicable.
The disclosure of information in Redfishs Schedules or
Dorados Schedules to this Agreement as an exception to, or
for purposes of, a representation, warranty or covenant in this
Agreement shall be deemed adequately disclosed as an exception
to, or for purposes of, all other representations, warranties
and covenants herein with respect to which the relevance of that
disclosure is readily apparent. The specification of any dollar
amount in the representations and warranties or otherwise in
this Agreement or in Redfishs Schedules or Dorados
Schedules to this Agreement is not intended to be, and shall not
be deemed to be, an admission or acknowledgment of the
materiality of such amounts or items, nor shall the same be used
in any dispute or controversy between the parties to determine
whether any obligation, item or matter (whether or not described
herein or included in any schedule) is or is not material for
purposes of this Agreement.
(b) The parties have participated jointly in negotiating
and drafting this Agreement. In the event that an ambiguity or a
question of intent or interpretation arises, this Agreement
shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties, and no
presumption or burden of proof shall arise favoring or
disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any
provision of this Agreement.
Section 9.13 Counterparts. This
Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, and by
the different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of
which when executed shall be deemed to be an original but all of
which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.
A-66
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Dorado and Redfish have caused this
Agreement to be executed as of the date first written above by
their respective officers thereunto duly authorized.
DENBURY RESOURCES INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Phil
Rykhoek
Phil
Rykhoek
Chief Executive Officer
|
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Jon
S. Brumley
Jon
S. Brumley
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
A-67
ANNEX B
|
|
|
|
|
745 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
United States
|
October 31, 2009
Board of Directors
Encore Acquisition Company
777 Main Street, Suite 1400
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
Members of
the Board:
We understand that Encore Acquisition Company
(Encore or the Company) intends to enter
into a transaction (the Proposed Transaction) with
Denbury Resources Inc. (Denbury) pursuant to which
(i) Encore will merge with and into Denbury, with Denbury
surviving the merger, and (ii) upon the effectiveness of
the merger, each share of common stock of the Company
(Encore Common Stock) then issued and outstanding
will be converted into the right to receive (a) $15.00 per
share in cash (the Cash Consideration) and
(b) a fraction of a share of common stock of Denbury
(Denbury Common Stock) equal to the Mixed Election
Stock Exchange Ratio (as defined below) (the Stock
Consideration and together with the Cash Consideration,
the Merger Consideration). The Mixed Election
Stock Exchange Ratio will be equal to the quotient
determined by dividing $35.00 by the volume weighted average
price of Denbury Common Stock for the period of twenty
(20) consecutive trading days ending on the second full
trading day prior to the effective time of the merger (the
Parent Share Value); provided, that (i) if the
Parent Share Value is equal to or greater than $16.91, the Mixed
Election Stock Exchange Ratio shall equal 2.0698, and
(ii) if the Parent Share Value is equal to or less than
$13.29, the Mixed Election Stock Exchange Ratio shall equal
2.6336. The terms and conditions of the Proposed Transaction are
set forth in more detail in the Agreement and Plan of Merger
dated as of October 31, 2009 by and among the Company and
Denbury (the Agreement) and the summary of the
Proposed Transaction set forth above is qualified in its
entirety by the terms of the Agreement.
We have been requested by the Board of Directors of the Company
to render our opinion with respect to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to the Companys stockholders of
the Merger Consideration to be received by such stockholders in
the Proposed Transaction. We have not been requested to opine as
to, and our opinion does not in any manner address, the
Companys underlying business decision to proceed with or
effect the Proposed Transaction. In addition, we express no
opinion on, and our opinion does not in any manner address, the
fairness of the amount or the nature of any compensation to any
officers, directors or employees of any parties to the Proposed
Transaction, or any class of such persons, relative to the
Merger Consideration to be received by the stockholders of the
Company in the Proposed Transaction.
In arriving at our opinion, we reviewed and analyzed:
(1) the Agreement and the specific terms of the Proposed
Transaction; (2) publicly available information concerning
Encore and Denbury that we believe to be relevant to our
analysis, including, without limitation, each of the
Companys and Denburys Annual Reports on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and Quarterly
Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and June 30,
2009; (3) financial and operating information with respect
to the business, operations and prospects of Encore furnished to
us by Encore, including financial projections of the Company
prepared by management of the Company; (4) financial and
operating information with respect to the business, operations
and prospects of Denbury furnished to us by Denbury, including
financial projections of Denbury prepared by the management of
Denbury; (5) estimates of certain (i) proved reserves,
as of December 31, 2008, for the Company as prepared by a
third-party reserve engineer (the Encore Year-End 2008
Engineered Report), (ii) proved reserves, as of
September 30, 2009, for the Company prepared by the
management of Encore as a roll-forward from the Encore Year-End
2008 Engineered Report and (iii) non-proved reserves, as of
B-1
September 30, 2009, for the Company as prepared by the
management of Encore ((i) through (iii) collectively, the
Company Reserve Reports); (6) estimates of
certain (i) proved and probable reserves, as of
June 30, 2009, for Denbury as prepared by a third-party
reserve engineer (the Denbury Mid-Year 2009 Engineered 2P
Report), (ii) proved and probable reserves, as of
September 30, 2009, for Denbury prepared by the management
of Denbury as a roll-forward from the Denbury Mid-Year 2009
Engineered 2P Report and (iii) possible reserves, as of
September 30, 2009, as prepared by the management of
Denbury ((i) through (iii) collectively, the Denbury
Reserve Reports); (7) the trading histories of Encore
Common Stock and Denburys Common Stock from
October 31, 2007 to October 30, 2009 and a comparison
of those trading histories with each other and with those of
other companies that we deemed relevant; (8) a comparison
of the historical financial results and present financial
condition of Encore and Denbury with each other and with those
of other companies that we deemed relevant; (9) a
comparison of the financial terms of the Proposed Transaction
with the financial terms of certain other transactions that we
deemed relevant; (10) the potential pro forma impact of the
Proposed Transaction on the current and future financial
performance of the combined company, including the amounts and
timing of the cost savings and operating synergies expected by
the management of Denbury to result from the Proposed
Transaction (the Expected Synergies);
(11) published estimates by independent equity research
analysts with respect to the future financial performance of
Encore and Denbury; (12) the relative contributions of
Encore and Denbury to the current and future financial
performance of the combined company on a pro forma basis; and
(13) the results of Encores efforts to solicit
indications of interest and definitive proposals from third
parties with respect to an acquisition of the Company. In
addition, we have (i) had discussions with the managements
of Encore and Denbury concerning their respective businesses,
operations, assets, financial conditions, reserves, production
profiles, hedging levels, commodity prices, development
programs, exploration programs and prospects and
(ii) undertaken such other studies, analyses and
investigations as we deemed appropriate.
In arriving at our opinion, we have assumed and relied upon the
accuracy and completeness of the financial and other information
used by us without assuming any responsibility for independent
verification of such information and have further relied upon
the assurances of the managements of Encore and Denbury that
they are not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make
such information inaccurate or misleading. With respect to the
financial projections of Encore, upon advice of Encore, we have
assumed that such projections have been reasonably prepared on a
basis reflecting the best currently available estimates and
judgments of the management of Encore as to the future financial
performance of Encore and that Encore will perform substantially
in accordance with such projections. With respect to the
financial projections of Denbury, upon advice of Encore and
Denbury, we have assumed that such projections have been
reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently
available estimates and judgments of the management of Denbury
as to the future financial performance of Denbury and that
Denbury will perform substantially in accordance with such
projections. With respect to the Company Reserve Reports, we
have discussed these reports with the management of Encore and
upon the advice of Encore, we have assumed that the Company
Reserve Reports are a reasonable basis upon which to evaluate
the proved and non-proved reserve levels of Encore. With respect
to the Denbury Reserve Reports, we have discussed these reports
with the managements of Encore and Denbury and upon the advice
of Encore and Denbury, we have assumed that the Denbury Reserve
Reports are a reasonable basis upon which to evaluate the proved
and non-proved reserve levels of Denbury. With respect to the
Expected Synergies, we have assumed that the amount and timing
of the Expected Synergies are reasonable as estimated by the
management of Denbury and discussed with the management of the
Company and we also have assumed upon the advice of Denbury and
the Company that the Expected Synergies will be realized
substantially in accordance with such estimates. In arriving at
our opinion, we have not conducted a physical inspection of the
properties and facilities of Encore or Denbury and have not made
or obtained any evaluations or appraisals of the assets or
liabilities of Encore or Denbury. Our opinion necessarily is
based upon market, economic and other conditions as they exist
on, and can be evaluated as of, the date of this letter. We
assume no responsibility for updating or revising our opinion
based on events or circumstances that may occur after the date
of this letter.
We have assumed the accuracy of the representations and
warranties contained in the Agreement and all agreements related
thereto. We have also assumed, upon the advice of the Company,
that all material governmental, regulatory and third party
approvals, consents and releases for the Proposed Transaction
will be obtained within the constraints contemplated by the
Agreement and that the Proposed Transaction will be
B-2
consummated in accordance with the terms of the Agreement
without waiver, modification or amendment of any material term,
condition or agreement thereof. We do not express any opinion as
to any tax or other consequences that might result from the
Proposed Transaction, nor does our opinion address any legal,
tax, regulatory or accounting matters, as to which we understand
that the Company has obtained such advice as it deemed necessary
from qualified professionals. In addition, we express no opinion
as to the prices at which shares of (i) Encore Common Stock
or Denbury Common Stock will trade at any time following the
announcement of the Proposed Transaction or (ii) Denbury
Common Stock will trade at any time following the consummation
of the Proposed Transaction.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion
as of the date hereof that, from a financial point of view, the
Merger Consideration to be received by the stockholders of the
Company in the Proposed Transaction is fair to such stockholders.
We have acted as financial advisor to Encore in connection with
the Proposed Transaction and will receive fees for our services,
a portion of which is payable upon rendering this opinion and a
substantial portion of which is contingent upon the consummation
of the Proposed Transaction. In addition, Encore has agreed to
reimburse our expenses and indemnify us for certain liabilities
that may arise out of our engagement. We have performed various
investment banking services for Encore and its affiliates in the
past, and have received customary fees for such services.
Specifically, in the past two years, we have performed the
following investment banking and financial services for Encore
and its affiliates, for which we have received customary
compensation: (i) in September 2009, we acted as the sole
underwriter on Encores 2.75 million common share
offering, (ii), in June 2009, we acted as financial advisor to
Encores Board of Directors in connection with its sale of
certain oil and natural gas properties to Encore Energy Partners
LP (EEPLP), (iii) in June 2009, we acted as
joint bookrunner on EEPLPs primary unit offering, the
proceeds of which were partially used to finance the immediately
aforementioned transaction, (iv) in May 2009, we acted as
financial advisor to the Encores Board of Directors in
connection with Encores sale of certain oil and natural
gas properties to EEPLP, (v) in May 2009 we acted as joint
bookrunner on EEPLPs primary unit offering, the proceeds
of which were partially used to finance the immediately
aforementioned transaction, (vi) in December 2008, we acted
as financial advisor to the Encores Board of Directors in
connection with its sale of certain natural gas properties to
EEPLP, and (vii) we are currently a lender under
EEPLPs existing revolving credit facility. In the past two
years, we have performed only limited services for Denbury for
which we have received limited compensation. We expect to
perform investment banking and financial services for Denbury
and its affiliates in the future and expect to receive customary
fees for such services.
Barclays Capital Inc. is a full service securities firm engaged
in a wide range of businesses from investment and commercial
banking, lending, asset management and other financial and
non-financial services. In the ordinary course of our business,
we and our affiliates may actively trade and effect transactions
in the equity, debt
and/or other
securities (and any derivatives thereof) and financial
instruments (including loans and other obligations) of Encore
and Denbury and their affiliates for our own account and for the
accounts of our customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold
long or short positions and investments in such securities and
financial instruments.
This opinion, the issuance of which has been approved by our
Fairness Opinion Committee, is for the use and benefit of the
Board of Directors of Encore and is rendered to the Board of
Directors in connection with its consideration of the Proposed
Transaction. This opinion is not intended to be and does not
constitute a recommendation to any stockholder of Encore as to
how such stockholder should vote or act with respect to any
matter relating to the Proposed Transaction.
Very truly yours,
BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Chris
Watson
Name: Chris
Watson
Title: Managing Director
|
B-3
ANNEX C
October 31,
2009
The Board of Directors
Denbury Resources Inc.
5100 Tennyson Parkway, Suite 1200
Plano, Texas 75024
Members of
the Board of Directors:
You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to Denbury Resources Inc. (the
Company) of the consideration to be paid by the
Company in the proposed merger (the Transaction) of
Encore Acquisition Company (the Merger Partner) with
and into the Company pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of
Merger, by and between the Company and the Merger Partner (the
Agreement). All capitalized terms used herein
without definition shall have the meanings provided in the
Agreement.
We understand that, pursuant to the Agreement, the separate
corporate existence of Merger Partner shall cease, and each
outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of
the Merger Partner (the Merger Partner Common
Stock), other than (x) the Redfish 2009 Bonus
Restricted Shares, (y) the Redfish Excluded Shares and
(z) the Redfish Subsidiary Shares, will be converted into
the right to receive the following consideration at the election
of the holder of such share: (i) the Per Share Mixed
Consideration, consisting of a combination of (A) $15.00 in
cash and (B) a number of shares of common stock, par value
$0.001 per share, of the Company (Company Common
Stock) equal to the quotient determined by dividing $35.00
by the volume weighted average price of the Company Common Stock
for the period specified in, and as calculated pursuant to the
terms of, the Agreement (the Company Share Value);
(ii) the Per Share Cash Election Consideration, consisting
of $50.00 in cash, without interest; or (iii) the Per Share
Stock Election Consideration, consisting of a number of shares
of Company Common Stock equal to the quotient determined by
dividing $50.00 by the Company Share Value (together with any
cash in lieu of fractional shares of Company Common Stock to be
paid as provided in the Agreement); subject in the case of a
mixed election referred to in clause (i) above or a stock
election referred to in clause (iii) above to certain
adjustments and rounding and, in the case of a cash election
referred to clause in (ii) above or a stock election referred to
in clause (iii) above, to proration, each as provided in
the Agreement. The Per Share Mixed Consideration, the Per Share
Cash Election Consideration and the Per Share Stock Election
Consideration are referred to collectively herein as the
Consideration. The terms and conditions of the
Transaction are set forth in more detail in the Agreement.
In arriving at our opinion, we have (i) reviewed a draft of
the Agreement dated October 31, 2009; (ii) reviewed
certain publicly available business and financial information
concerning the Merger Partner and the Company and the industries
in which they operate; (iii) compared the financial and
operating performance of the Merger Partner and the Company with
publicly available information concerning certain other
companies we deemed relevant and reviewed the current and
historical market prices of the Merger Partner Common Stock and
the Company Common Stock and certain publicly traded securities
of such other companies; (iv) reviewed certain internal
financial analyses and forecasts prepared by or at the direction
of the managements of the Merger Partner and the Company
relating to their respective businesses, as well as the
estimated amount and timing of the cost savings and related
expenses and synergies expected to result from the Transaction
(the Synergies); (v) reviewed certain reserve
reports from independent engineering firms regarding the proved
reserves of the Merger Partner and the Company both on a risked
and unrisked basis (collectively, the Reserve
Reports); and (vi) performed such other financial
studies and analyses and considered such other information
(including whether there were any other transactions involving
companies we deemed relevant) as we deemed appropriate for the
purposes of this opinion.
In addition, we have held discussions with certain members of
the management of the Merger Partner and the Company with
respect to certain aspects of the Transaction, and the past and
current business operations of
C-1
the Merger Partner and the Company, the financial condition and
future prospects and operations of the Merger Partner and the
Company, the effects of the Transaction on the financial
condition and future prospects of the Company, and certain other
matters we believed necessary or appropriate to our inquiry.
In giving our opinion, we have relied upon and assumed the
accuracy and completeness of all information that was publicly
available or was furnished to or discussed with us by the Merger
Partner and the Company or otherwise reviewed by or for us, and
we have not independently verified (nor have we assumed
responsibility or liability for independently verifying) any
such information or its accuracy or completeness. We have not
conducted or been provided with an independent valuation of the
equity interest owned by Merger Partner in Encore Energy
Partners LP (Encore LP), a publicly traded
subsidiary of the Merger Partner, and have assumed that the
value of such equity interest is the value implied by the
trading market value. We have not conducted or been provided
with any valuation or appraisal of any assets or liabilities
(other than our receipt of the Reserve Reports), nor have we
evaluated the solvency of the Merger Partner or the Company
under any state or federal laws relating to bankruptcy,
insolvency or similar matters. In relying on financial analyses
and forecasts provided to us or derived therefrom, including the
Reserve Reports and the Synergies, we have assumed that they
have been reasonably prepared based on assumptions reflecting
the best currently available estimates and judgments by
management as to the expected future results of operations and
financial condition of the Merger Partner and the Company to
which such analyses or forecasts relate. We express no view as
to such analyses or forecasts (including the Reserve Reports and
the Synergies) or the assumptions on which they were based. We
have also assumed that the Transaction will qualify as a
tax-free reorganization for United States federal income tax
purposes, and will be consummated as described in the Agreement,
and that the definitive Agreement will not differ in any
material respects from the draft thereof furnished to us. We
have also assumed that the representations and warranties made
by the Company and the Merger Partner in the Agreement and the
related agreements are and will be true and correct in all
respects material to our analysis. We are not legal, regulatory
or tax experts and have relied on the assessments made by
advisors to the Company with respect to such issues. We have
further assumed that all material governmental, regulatory or
other consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of
the Transaction will be obtained without any adverse effect on
the Merger Partner or the Company or on the contemplated
benefits of the Transaction.
Our opinion is necessarily based on economic, market and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available
to us as of, the date hereof. It should be understood that
subsequent developments may affect this opinion and that we do
not have any obligation to update, revise, or reaffirm this
opinion. Our opinion is limited to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the Consideration to be paid by the
Company in the proposed Transaction and we express no opinion as
to the fairness of the Transaction to the holders of any class
of securities, creditors or other constituencies of the Company
or as to the underlying decision by the Company to engage in the
Transaction. Furthermore, we express no opinion with respect to
the amount or nature of any compensation to any officers,
directors, or employees of any party to the Transaction, or any
class of such persons relative to the Consideration to be paid
by the Company in the Transaction or with respect to the
fairness of any such compensation. We are expressing no opinion
herein as to the price at which the Company Common Stock or the
Merger Partner Common Stock will trade at any future time.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Company with respect
to the proposed Transaction and will receive a fee from the
Company for our services, a substantial portion of which will
become payable only if the proposed Transaction is consummated.
In addition, the Company has agreed to indemnify us for certain
liabilities arising out of our engagement. During the two years
preceding the date of this letter, we and our affiliates have
had commercial or investment banking relationships with the
Company and its affiliates and with Encore LP, for which we and
such affiliates have received customary compensation. Such
services during such period have included acting as financial
advisor on the sale of certain Company assets in July 2009 and
as lead bookrunner on the Companys offering of high yield
debt securities in February 2009, and acting as co-managing
underwriter on a follow-on equity offering for Encore LP in June
2009. In addition, our commercial banking affiliate is an agent
bank and a lender under outstanding credit facilities of the
Company and as a lender under outstanding credit facilities of
the Merger Partner, for which it receives customary
C-2
compensation or other financial benefits. We anticipate that we
and our affiliates will arrange
and/or
provide financing to the Company in connection with the
Transaction for customary compensation. In the ordinary course
of our businesses, we and our affiliates may actively trade the
debt and equity securities of the Company or the Merger Partner
for our own account or for the accounts of customers and,
accordingly, we may at any time hold long or short positions in
such securities.
On the basis of and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion
as of the date hereof that the Consideration to be paid by the
Company in the proposed Transaction is fair, from a financial
point of view, to the Company.
The issuance of this opinion has been approved by a fairness
opinion committee of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. This
letter is provided to the Board of Directors of the Company in
connection with and for the purposes of its evaluation of the
Transaction. This opinion does not constitute a recommendation
to any shareholder of the Company as to how such shareholder
should vote with respect to the Transaction or any other matter.
This opinion may not be disclosed, referred to, or communicated
(in whole or in part) to any third party for any purpose
whatsoever except with our prior written approval. This opinion
may be reproduced in full in any proxy or information statement
mailed to shareholders of the Company but may not otherwise be
disclosed publicly in any manner without our prior written
approval.
Very truly yours,
/s/ J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES INC.
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
C-3
ANNEX D
8 DEL. C.
§ 262
(a) Any stockholder of a corporation of this State who
holds shares of stock on the date of the making of a demand
pursuant to subsection (d) of this section with respect to
such shares, who continuously holds such shares through the
effective date of the merger or consolidation, who has otherwise
complied with subsection (d) of this section and who has
neither voted in favor of the merger or consolidation nor
consented thereto in writing pursuant to § 228 of this
title shall be entitled to an appraisal by the Court of Chancery
of the fair value of the stockholders shares of stock
under the circumstances described in subsections (b) and
(c) of this section. As used in this section, the word
stockholder means a holder of record of stock in a
stock corporation and also a member of record of a nonstock
corporation; the words stock and share
mean and include what is ordinarily meant by those words and
also membership or membership interest of a member of a nonstock
corporation; and the words depository receipt mean a
receipt or other instrument issued by a depository representing
an interest in one or more shares, or fractions thereof, solely
of stock of a corporation, which stock is deposited with the
depository.
(b) Appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of
any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation in a
merger or consolidation to be effected pursuant to
§ 251 (other than a merger effected pursuant to
§ 251(g) of this title), § 252,
§ 254, § 257, § 258,
§ 263 or § 264 of this title:
(1) Provided, however, that no appraisal rights under this
section shall be available for the shares of any class or series
of stock, which stock, or depository receipts in respect
thereof, at the record date fixed to determine the stockholders
entitled to receive notice of the meeting of stockholders to act
upon the agreement of merger or consolidation, were either
(i) listed on a national securities exchange or
(ii) held of record by more than 2,000 holders; and further
provided that no appraisal rights shall be available for any
shares of stock of the constituent corporation surviving a
merger if the merger did not require for its approval the vote
of the stockholders of the surviving corporation as provided in
§ 251(f) of this title.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of this subsection,
appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the
shares of any class or series of stock of a constituent
corporation if the holders thereof are required by the terms of
an agreement of merger or consolidation pursuant to
§§ 251, 252, 254, 257, 258, 263 and 264 of this
title to accept for such stock anything except:
a. Shares of stock of the corporation surviving or
resulting from such merger or consolidation, or depository
receipts in respect thereof;
b. Shares of stock of any other corporation, or depository
receipts in respect thereof, which shares of stock (or
depository receipts in respect thereof) or depository receipts
at the effective date of the merger or consolidation will be
either listed on a national securities exchange or held of
record by more than 2,000 holders;
c. Cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional
depository receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs a.
and b. of this paragraph; or
d. Any combination of the shares of stock, depository
receipts and cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional
depository receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs a.,
b. and c. of this paragraph.
(3) In the event all of the stock of a subsidiary Delaware
corporation party to a merger effected under § 253 of
this title is not owned by the parent corporation immediately
prior to the merger, appraisal rights shall be available for the
shares of the subsidiary Delaware corporation.
(c) Any corporation may provide in its certificate of
incorporation that appraisal rights under this section shall be
available for the shares of any class or series of its stock as
a result of an amendment to its certificate of incorporation,
any merger or consolidation in which the corporation is a
constituent corporation or the sale of all or substantially all
of the assets of the corporation. If the certificate of
D-1
incorporation contains such a provision, the procedures of this
section, including those set forth in subsections (d) and
(e) of this section, shall apply as nearly as is
practicable.
(d) Appraisal rights shall be perfected as follows:
(1) If a proposed merger or consolidation for which
appraisal rights are provided under this section is to be
submitted for approval at a meeting of stockholders, the
corporation, not less than 20 days prior to the meeting,
shall notify each of its stockholders who was such on the record
date for notice of such meeting with respect to shares for which
appraisal rights are available pursuant to subsection (b)
or (c) hereof that appraisal rights are available for any
or all of the shares of the constituent corporations, and shall
include in such notice a copy of this section. Each stockholder
electing to demand the appraisal of such stockholders
shares shall deliver to the corporation, before the taking of
the vote on the merger or consolidation, a written demand for
appraisal of such stockholders shares. Such demand will be
sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the
identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends
thereby to demand the appraisal of such stockholders
shares. A proxy or vote against the merger or consolidation
shall not constitute such a demand. A stockholder electing to
take such action must do so by a separate written demand as
herein provided. Within 10 days after the effective date of
such merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting
corporation shall notify each stockholder of each constituent
corporation who has complied with this subsection and has not
voted in favor of or consented to the merger or consolidation of
the date that the merger or consolidation has become
effective; or
(2) If the merger or consolidation was approved pursuant to
§ 228 or § 253 of this title, then either a
constituent corporation before the effective date of the merger
or consolidation or the surviving or resulting corporation
within 10 days thereafter shall notify each of the holders
of any class or series of stock of such constituent corporation
who are entitled to appraisal rights of the approval of the
merger or consolidation and that appraisal rights are available
for any or all shares of such class or series of stock of such
constituent corporation, and shall include in such notice a copy
of this section. Such notice may, and, if given on or after the
effective date of the merger or consolidation, shall, also
notify such stockholders of the effective date of the merger or
consolidation. Any stockholder entitled to appraisal rights may,
within 20 days after the date of mailing of such notice,
demand in writing from the surviving or resulting corporation
the appraisal of such holders shares. Such demand will be
sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the
identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends
thereby to demand the appraisal of such holders shares. If
such notice did not notify stockholders of the effective date of
the merger or consolidation, either (i) each such
constituent corporation shall send a second notice before the
effective date of the merger or consolidation notifying each of
the holders of any class or series of stock of such constituent
corporation that are entitled to appraisal rights of the
effective date of the merger or consolidation or (ii) the
surviving or resulting corporation shall send such a second
notice to all such holders on or within 10 days after such
effective date; provided, however, that if such second notice is
sent more than 20 days following the sending of the first
notice, such second notice need only be sent to each stockholder
who is entitled to appraisal rights and who has demanded
appraisal of such holders shares in accordance with this
subsection. An affidavit of the secretary or assistant secretary
or of the transfer agent of the corporation that is required to
give either notice that such notice has been given shall, in the
absence of fraud, be prima facie evidence of the facts stated
therein. For purposes of determining the stockholders entitled
to receive either notice, each constituent corporation may fix,
in advance, a record date that shall be not more than
10 days prior to the date the notice is given, provided,
that if the notice is given on or after the effective date of
the merger or consolidation, the record date shall be such
effective date. If no record date is fixed and the notice is
given prior to the effective date, the record date shall be the
close of business on the day next preceding the day on which the
notice is given.
(e) Within 120 days after the effective date of the
merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation
or any stockholder who has complied with subsections (a)
and (d) of this section hereof and who is otherwise
entitled to appraisal rights, may commence an appraisal
proceeding by filing a petition in the Court of Chancery
demanding a determination of the value of the stock of all such
stockholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time within
60 days after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, any
D-2
stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or
joined that proceeding as a named party shall have the right to
withdraw such stockholders demand for appraisal and to
accept the terms offered upon the merger or consolidation.
Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, any stockholder who has complied with the
requirements of subsections (a) and (d) of this
section hereof, upon written request, shall be entitled to
receive from the corporation surviving the merger or resulting
from the consolidation a statement setting forth the aggregate
number of shares not voted in favor of the merger or
consolidation and with respect to which demands for appraisal
have been received and the aggregate number of holders of such
shares. Such written statement shall be mailed to the
stockholder within 10 days after such stockholders
written request for such a statement is received by the
surviving or resulting corporation or within 10 days after
expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal
under subsection (d) of this section hereof, whichever is
later. Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, a
person who is the beneficial owner of shares of such stock held
either in a voting trust or by a nominee on behalf of such
person may, in such persons own name, file a petition or
request from the corporation the statement described in this
subsection.
(f) Upon the filing of any such petition by a stockholder,
service of a copy thereof shall be made upon the surviving or
resulting corporation, which shall within 20 days after
such service file in the office of the Register in Chancery in
which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the
names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded
payment for their shares and with whom agreements as to the
value of their shares have not been reached by the surviving or
resulting corporation. If the petition shall be filed by the
surviving or resulting corporation, the petition shall be
accompanied by such a duly verified list. The Register in
Chancery, if so ordered by the Court, shall give notice of the
time and place fixed for the hearing of such petition by
registered or certified mail to the surviving or resulting
corporation and to the stockholders shown on the list at the
addresses therein stated. Such notice shall also be given by 1
or more publications at least 1 week before the day of the
hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation published in the
City of Wilmington, Delaware or such publication as the Court
deems advisable. The forms of the notices by mail and by
publication shall be approved by the Court, and the costs
thereof shall be borne by the surviving or resulting corporation.
(g) At the hearing on such petition, the Court shall
determine the stockholders who have complied with this section
and who have become entitled to appraisal rights. The Court may
require the stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for
their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to
submit their certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery
for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal
proceedings; and if any stockholder fails to comply with such
direction, the Court may dismiss the proceedings as to such
stockholder.
(h) After the Court determines the stockholders entitled to
an appraisal, the appraisal proceeding shall be conducted in
accordance with the rules of the Court of Chancery, including
any rules specifically governing appraisal proceedings. Through
such proceeding the Court shall determine the fair value of the
shares exclusive of any element of value arising from the
accomplishment or expectation of the merger or consolidation,
together with interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount
determined to be the fair value. In determining such fair value,
the Court shall take into account all relevant factors. Unless
the Court in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause
shown, interest from the effective date of the merger through
the date of payment of the judgment shall be compounded
quarterly and shall accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve
discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time
to time during the period between the effective date of the
merger and the date of payment of the judgment. Upon application
by the surviving or resulting corporation or by any stockholder
entitled to participate in the appraisal proceeding, the Court
may, in its discretion, proceed to trial upon the appraisal
prior to the final determination of the stockholders entitled to
an appraisal. Any stockholder whose name appears on the list
filed by the surviving or resulting corporation pursuant to
subsection (f) of this section and who has submitted such
stockholders certificates of stock to the Register in
Chancery, if such is required, may participate fully in all
proceedings until it is finally determined that such stockholder
is not entitled to appraisal rights under this section.
(i) The Court shall direct the payment of the fair value of
the shares, together with interest, if any, by the surviving or
resulting corporation to the stockholders entitled thereto.
Payment shall be so made to each such
D-3
stockholder, in the case of holders of uncertificated stock
forthwith, and the case of holders of shares represented by
certificates upon the surrender to the corporation of the
certificates representing such stock. The Courts decree
may be enforced as other decrees in the Court of Chancery may be
enforced, whether such surviving or resulting corporation be a
corporation of this State or of any state.
(j) The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the
Court and taxed upon the parties as the Court deems equitable in
the circumstances. Upon application of a stockholder, the Court
may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any
stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding,
including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys fees
and the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata
against the value of all the shares entitled to an appraisal.
(k) From and after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, no stockholder who has demanded appraisal rights
as provided in subsection (d) of this section shall be
entitled to vote such stock for any purpose or to receive
payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except
dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of
record at a date which is prior to the effective date of the
merger or consolidation); provided, however, that if no petition
for an appraisal shall be filed within the time provided in
subsection (e) of this section, or if such stockholder
shall deliver to the surviving or resulting corporation a
written withdrawal of such stockholders demand for an
appraisal and an acceptance of the merger or consolidation,
either within 60 days after the effective date of the
merger or consolidation as provided in subsection (e) of
this section or thereafter with the written approval of the
corporation, then the right of such stockholder to an appraisal
shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal
proceeding in the Court of Chancery shall be dismissed as to any
stockholder without the approval of the Court, and such approval
may be conditioned upon such terms as the Court deems just;
provided, however that this provision shall not affect the right
of any stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding
or joined that proceeding as a named party to withdraw such
stockholders demand for appraisal and to accept the terms
offered upon the merger or consolidation within 60 days
after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, as set
forth in subsection (e) of this section.
(l) The shares of the surviving or resulting corporation to
which the shares of such objecting stockholders would have been
converted had they assented to the merger or consolidation shall
have the status of authorized and unissued shares of the
surviving or resulting corporation.
D-4
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE TODAY.
We encourage you to take advantage of Internet or telephone voting.
Both are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Internet and telephone voting is available through 11:59 PM Eastern Time on March 8, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTERNET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.proxyvoting.com/eac |
|
|
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY |
|
|
|
|
|
Use the Internet to vote your proxy.
Have your proxy card in hand when you
access the web site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TELEPHONE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-866-540-5760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use any touch-tone telephone to vote
your proxy. Have your proxy card in
hand when you call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone,
you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Important
notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the
Special Meeting of Stockholders. The Proxy Statement to Stockholders is available at: http://www.encoreacq.com/2010specialmeeting.cfm
| |
|
|
|
|
To vote by mail, mark, sign and date your proxy card
and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named
proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if
you marked, signed and returned your proxy card. |
|
68268
6 FOLD AND DETACH HERE 6
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED, OR IF NO DIRECTION IS INDICATED, WILL BE VOTED FOR PROPOSALS 1 AND 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please mark your votes as indicated in this example |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Adopt the Agreement and Plan of
Merger dated October 31, 2009, by
and between Denbury Resources Inc.
and Encore Acquisition Company.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
Adjourn the special meeting of
stockholders, if necessary or
appropriate to permit the
solicitation of additional proxies
if there are not sufficient votes at
the time of the special meeting to
adopt the Agreement and Plan of
Merger.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Here for
Address Change or
Comments
SEE REVERSE
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
|
|
Signature (if held jointly)
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Please sign as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor,
administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such.
6 FOLD AND DETACH HERE 6
PROXY
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE
SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD MARCH 9, 2010
By signing this proxy, I appoint I. Jon Brumley, Jon S. Brumley and Robert C. Reeves, and each
of them, with power to act without the other and with power of substitution, as proxies and
attorneys-in-fact and I hereby authorize them to represent and vote, as provided on the other side,
all the shares of Encore Acquisition Company (Encore) Common Stock which I am entitled to vote,
and, in their discretion, to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Special
Meeting of Stockholders or any adjournment or postponement thereof, with all powers which I would
possess if present at the Special Meeting of Stockholders.
If this proxy is properly executed, your shares of Encore common stock represented by this
proxy will be voted in the manner you specify. If no specification is made, your shares of Encore
common stock will be voted FOR the proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
October 31, 2009, by and between Denbury Resources Inc. and Encore, and FOR the proposal to adjourn
the Special Meeting of Stockholders, if necessary or appropriate to permit the solicitation of
additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting of
Stockholders to adopt Proposal 1. The proxies are authorized to vote your shares, in their
discretion, on any other matter that is properly brought before the meeting.
Address Change/Comments
(Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side)
BNY MELLON SHAREOWNER SERVICES
P.O. BOX 3550
SOUTH HACKENSACK, NJ 07606-9250
(Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)
68268