e497
Filed
pursuant to Rule 497(e)
Registration No. 333-164270
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
(To Prospectus dated March 4, 2010)
Resales of
2,092,022 Shares
Common Stock
Prospect Capital Corporation is a financial services company
that lends to and invests in middle market, privately-held
companies. We are organized as an externally-managed,
non-diversified closed-end management investment company that
has elected to be treated as a business development company
under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Prospect Capital
Management LLC manages our investments, and Prospect
Administration LLC provides the administrative services
necessary for us to operate.
On September 24, 2009, we issued 2,807,111 shares at
$9.00 per share in a private stock offering. Concurrent with the
sale of these shares, we entered into a registration rights
agreement (Registration Rights Agreement) in which
we granted the purchasers certain registration rights with
respect to these shares. Pursuant to the Registration Rights
Agreement, certain selling stockholders (the selling
stockholders) may offer the shares of our common stock
purchased in such private transaction from time to time. The
sale by selling stockholders of these shares may depress the
current market price of our shares. See Selling
Stockholders and Plan of Distribution in this
prospectus supplement.
This prospectus supplement relates to the offer and sale from
time to time by the selling stockholders identified in this
prospectus supplement of up to 2,092,022 shares of our
common stock. The selling stockholders will receive all of the
proceeds from any sales of common stock offered pursuant to this
prospectus supplement. The selling stockholders may sell the
common stock at various times and in various types of
transactions, including, but not limited to, sales in the open
market, sales in negotiated transactions and sales by a
combination of these methods. See Plan of
Distribution in this prospectus supplement.
At our annual meeting of stockholders held on December 11,
2009, our stockholders approved our ability to sell an unlimited
number of shares of our common stock at any level of discount
from net asset value per share during the twelve month period
following such approval. Sales of common stock at prices below
net asset value per share dilute the interests of existing
stockholders, have the effect of reducing our net asset value
per share and may reduce our market price per share. See
Risk Factors beginning on
page S-6
and Sales of Common Stock Below Net Asset Value
beginning on
page S-13
of this prospectus supplement and on page 87 of the
accompanying prospectus.
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol PSEC. The last reported closing
sales price for our common stock on March 5, 2010 was
$12.10 per share and our most recently determined net asset
value per share was $10.06 as of December 31, 2009 ($10.07
on an as adjusted basis solely to give effect to our issuances
of common stock on January 25, 2010 in connection with our
dividend reinvestment plan).
This prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus
contain important information you should know before investing
in our securities. Please read it before you invest and keep it
for future reference. We file annual, quarterly and current
reports, proxy statements and other information about us with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. This
information is available free of charge by contacting us at 10
East 40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, NY 10016 or by
telephone at
(212) 448-0702.
The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov where such
information is available without charge upon written or oral
request. Our Internet website address is www.prospectstreet.com.
Information contained on our website is not incorporated by
reference into this prospectus supplement or the accompanying
prospectus and you should not consider information contained on
our website to be part of this prospectus.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See
Risk Factors beginning on
page S-6
of this prospectus supplement and on page 9 of the
accompanying prospectus.
The SEC has not approved or disapproved of these securities
or determined if this prospectus supplement or the accompanying
prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the
contrary is a criminal offense.
Prospectus Supplement dated March 8, 2010
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. We have
not authorized any other person to provide you with information
that is different from that contained in this prospectus
supplement or the accompanying prospectus. If anyone provides
you with different or inconsistent information, you should not
rely on it. We and the selling stockholders are not making an
offer of these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer is
not permitted. You should assume that the information appearing
in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus is
accurate only as of their respective dates. Our business,
financial condition and results of operations may have changed
since those dates. This prospectus supplement supersedes the
accompanying prospectus to the extent it contains information
that is different from or in addition to the information in that
prospectus.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
S-1
|
|
|
|
|
S-5
|
|
|
|
|
S-6
|
|
|
|
|
S-6
|
|
|
|
|
S-9
|
|
|
|
|
S-10
|
|
|
|
|
S-11
|
|
|
|
|
S-13
|
|
|
|
|
S-18
|
|
|
|
|
S-19
|
|
|
|
|
S-19
|
|
|
|
|
S-19
|
|
PROSPECTUS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
i
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights some information from this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus, and it may not
contain all of the information that is important to you. To
understand the terms of the common stock offered hereby, you
should read this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus carefully. Together, these documents describe the
specific terms of the shares we and the selling stockholders are
offering. You should carefully read the sections titled
Risk Factors in this prospectus supplement and in
the accompanying prospectus and the documents identified in the
section Available Information.
The terms we, us, our and
Company, refer to Prospect Capital Corporation;
Prospect Capital Management and Investment
Advisor refer to Prospect Capital Management LLC; and
Prospect Administration and the
Administrator refer to Prospect Administration
LLC.
The
Company
Prospect Capital Corporation is a financial services company
that primarily lends to and invests in middle market
privately-held companies. We are a closed-end investment company
that has filed an election to be treated as a business
development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, or
the 1940 Act. We invest primarily in senior and subordinated
debt and equity of companies in need of capital for
acquisitions, divestitures, growth, development, project
financing and recapitalization. We work with the management
teams or financial sponsors to seek investments with historical
cash flows, asset collateral or contracted pro-forma cash flows.
Typically, we concentrate on making investments in companies
with annual revenues of less than $500 million and
enterprise values of less than $250 million. Our typical
investment involves a secured loan of less than $50 million
with some form of equity participation. From time to time, we
acquire controlling interests in companies in conjunction with
making secured debt investments in such companies. In most
cases, companies in which we invest are privately held at the
time we invest in them. We refer to these companies as
target or middle market companies and
these investments as middle market investments.
We seek to maximize total returns to our investors, including
both current yield and equity upside, by applying rigorous
credit analysis and asset-based and cash-flow based lending
techniques to make and monitor our investments. A majority of
our investments to date have been in energy-related industries.
We have made no investments to date in the real estate or
mortgage industries, and we do not intend currently to focus on
such investments.
We are currently pursuing multiple investment opportunities,
including purchases of portfolios from private and public
companies, as well as originations and secondary purchases of
particular securities. There can be no assurance that we will
successfully consummate any investment opportunity we are
currently pursuing. Motivated sellers, including commercial
finance companies, hedge funds, other business development
companies, total return swap counterparties, banks,
collateralized loan obligation funds, and other entities, are
suffering from excess leverage, and we believe we are well
positioned to capitalize as potential buyers of such assets at
attractive prices. If any of these opportunities are
consummated, there can be no assurance that investors will share
our view of valuation or that any assets acquired will not be
subject to future write downs, each of which could have an
adverse effect on our stock price.
As of December 31, 2009, we held investments in
55 portfolio companies. The aggregate fair value as of
December 31, 2009 of investments in these portfolio
companies held on that date is approximately $648 million.
Our portfolio across all our long-term debt and certain equity
investments had an annualized current yield of 15.6% as of
December 31, 2009. The yield includes interest as well as
dividends.
S-1
Recent
Developments
On January 6, 2010, we announced a $15 million
increase in total commitments on our revolving credit facility,
increasing the facility size from $195 million to
$210 million.
On March 5, 2010 we announced that we had determined to
terminate our solicitation in opposition to the proposed merger
of Allied Capital Corporation with Ares Capital Corporation.
Annual
Meeting of Stockholders
At our 2009 annual meeting of stockholders held on
December 11, 2009, our stockholders approved our ability to
sell an unlimited number of shares of our common stock at any
level of discount from net asset value per share during the
twelve month period following such approval.
S-2
The
Offering
|
|
|
Common stock offered by the selling stockholders |
|
Up to 2,092,022 shares. |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of our
common stock by the selling stockholders. |
|
The NASDAQ Global Select Market symbol |
|
PSEC |
|
Risk factors |
|
See Risk Factors in this prospectus supplement and
the accompanying prospectus and other information in this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus for a
discussion of factors you should carefully consider before you
decide whether to make an investment in shares of our common
stock. |
|
Current distribution rate |
|
For our second fiscal quarter of 2010, our Board of Directors
declared a quarterly dividend of $0.40875 per share,
representing an annualized dividend yield of approximately
13.51% based on our March 5, 2010 closing stock price of
$12.10 per share. Such dividend was payable out of earnings. Our
dividend is subject to change or discontinuance at any time in
the discretion of our Board of Directors. Our future earnings
and operating cash flow may not be sufficient to support a
dividend. |
Fees
and Expenses
The following tables are intended to assist you in understanding
the costs and expenses that an investor in this offering will
bear directly or indirectly. In these tables, we assume that we
have borrowed $195 million under our recently completed
extended credit facility, which is the maximum amount currently
available under the credit facility at December 31, 2009.
Except where the context suggests otherwise, whenever this
prospectus supplement contains a reference to fees or expenses
paid by you, us or Prospect
Capital, or that we will pay fees or expenses,
the Company will pay such fees and expenses out of our net
assets and, consequently, you will indirectly bear such fees or
expenses as an investor in the Company. However, you will not be
required to deliver any money or otherwise bear personal
liability or responsibility for such fees or expenses.
|
|
|
Stockholder transaction expenses:
|
|
|
Sales load (as a percentage of offering price)
|
|
None
|
Offering expenses borne by us (as a percentage of offering
price)(1)
|
|
None
|
Dividend reinvestment plan expenses(2)
|
|
None
|
Total stockholder transaction expenses (as a percentage of
offering price)
|
|
None
|
Annual expenses (as a percentage of net assets attributable
to common stock)(3):
|
|
|
Management Fees(4)
|
|
2.74%
|
Incentive fees payable under Investment Advisory Agreement (20%
of realized capital gains and 20% of pre-incentive fee net
investment income)(5)
|
|
2.29%
|
Interest payments on borrowed funds
|
|
1.84%(6)
|
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses
|
|
0.02%(7)
|
Other expenses
|
|
1.99%(8)
|
Total annual expenses
|
|
8.89%(5)(8)
|
Example
The following table demonstrates the projected dollar amount of
cumulative expenses we would pay out of net assets and that you
would indirectly bear over various periods with respect to a
hypothetical investment in our
S-3
common stock. In calculating the following expense amounts, we
have assumed that our annual operating expenses would remain at
the levels set forth in the table above and that we pay the
transaction costs shown in the table above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
3 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
10 Years
|
|
|
You would pay the following expenses on a $1,000 investment,
assuming a 5% annual return
|
|
$
|
65.96
|
|
|
$
|
194.73
|
|
|
$
|
319.42
|
|
|
$
|
614.16
|
|
While the example assumes, as required by the SEC, a 5% annual
return, our performance will vary and may result in a return
greater or less than 5%. The income incentive fee under our
Investment Advisory Agreement with Prospect Capital Management
would be zero at the 5% annual return assumption required by the
SEC for this table, since no incentive fee is paid until the
annual return exceeds 7%. This illustration assumes that we will
not realize any capital gains computed net of all realized
capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation in any of the
indicated time periods. If we achieve sufficient returns on our
investments, including through the realization of capital gains,
to trigger an incentive fee of a material amount, our expenses,
and returns to our investors after such expenses, would be
higher. In addition, while the example assumes reinvestment of
all dividends and distributions at NAV per share, participants
in our dividend reinvestment plan will receive a number of
shares of our common stock determined by dividing the total
dollar amount of the dividend payable to a participant by the
market price per share of our common stock at the close of
trading on the valuation date for the dividend. See
Dividend Reinvestment Plan in the accompanying
prospectus for additional information regarding our dividend
reinvestment plan.
This example and the expenses in the table above should not
be considered a representation of our future expenses. Actual
expenses (including the cost of debt, if any, and other
expenses) may be greater or less than those shown.
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The offering expenses of this
offering were reported as a cost of the original issuance of the
shares by the Company. The portion thereof attributable to
registration of shares being sold by the selling stockholders
will or has been paid by the Company on behalf of the
stockholders as a whole and not by the selling stockholders.
|
(2)
|
|
The expenses of the dividend
reinvestment plan are included in other expenses.
|
(3)
|
|
Net assets attributable to our
common stock equal net assets (i.e., total assets less
liabilities other than liabilities for money borrowed for
investment purposes) at December 31, 2009. See
Capitalization in this prospectus supplement.
|
(4)
|
|
Our base management fee is 2% of
our gross assets (which include any amount borrowed, i.e., total
assets without deduction for any liabilities). Assuming that we
have borrowed $195 million (the size of our credit
facility), the 2% management fee of gross assets equals 2.74% of
net assets. See Management Management
Services Investment Advisory Agreement in the
accompanying prospectus and footnote 5 below.
|
(5)
|
|
Based on an annualized level of
incentive fee paid during our quarter ended December 31,
2009, all of which consisted of an income incentive fee. For a
more detailed discussion of the calculation of the two-part
incentive fee, see Management Management
Services Investment Advisory Agreement in the
accompanying prospectus.
|
(6)
|
|
We may borrow additional money
before and after the proceeds of this offering are substantially
invested. After this offering, we will have an increased amount
available for us under our $195 million extended credit
facility and we will continue to seek additional lenders to
upsize the facility to up to $250 million. For more
information, see Risk Factors Risks Relating
To Our Business Changes in interest rates may affect
our cost of capital and net investment income and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Results of
Operations Operating Expenses Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources in the
accompanying prospectus. The table above assumes that we have
borrowed $195 million under our credit facility, which is
the maximum amount currently available under the credit
facility. If we do not borrow amounts following this offering,
our base management fee, as a percentage of net assets
attributable to common stock, will decrease from the percentage
shown in the table above, as borrowings will not represent a
portion of our overall assets.
|
(7)
|
|
The Companys stockholders
indirectly bear the expenses of underlying investment companies
in which the Company invests. This amount includes the fees and
expenses of investment companies in which the Company is
invested in as of December 31, 2009. When applicable, fees
and expenses are based on historic fees and expenses for the
investment companies and for those investment companies with
little or no operating history, fees and expenses are based on
expected fees and expenses stated in the investment
companies prospectus or other similar communication
without giving effect to any performance. Future fees and
expenses for certain investment companies may be substantially
higher or lower because certain fees and expenses are based on
the performance of the investment companies, which may fluctuate
over time. The amount of the Companys average net assets
used in calculating this percentage was based on average monthly
net assets of approximately $637 million for the six months
ended December 31, 2009.
|
(8)
|
|
Other expense is based
on our annualized expenses during our quarter ended
December 31, 2009, as adjusted for the increased costs
anticipated in connection with the extended credit facility. See
Management Management Services
Administration Agreement in the accompanying prospectus.
|
S-4
RISK
FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
You should carefully consider the risks described below and in
the accompanying prospectus, together with all of the other
information included in this prospectus supplement and in the
accompanying prospectus, before you decide whether to make an
investment in our common stock. The risks set forth below and in
the accompanying prospectus are not the only risks we face. If
any of the adverse events or conditions described below or in
the accompanying prospectus occur, our business, financial
condition and results of operations could be materially
adversely affected. In such case, our NAV and the trading price
of our common stock could decline, we could reduce or eliminate
our dividend and you could lose all or part of your
investment.
Recent
developments may increase the risks associated with our business
and an investment in us.
The U.S. financial markets have been experiencing a high
level of volatility, disruption and distress, which was
exacerbated by the failure of several major financial
institutions in the last few months of 2008. In addition, the
U.S. economy has been in a recession, the aftermath of
which may be severe and prolonged. Similar conditions have
occurred in the financial markets and economies of numerous
other countries and could worsen, both in the U.S. and
globally. These conditions have raised the level of many of the
risks described in the accompanying prospectus and could have an
adverse effect on our portfolio companies as well as on our
business, financial condition, results of operations, dividend
payments, credit facility, access to capital, valuation of our
assets, including our NAV and our stock price.
If we
sell common stock at a discount to our NAV per share,
stockholders who do not participate in such sale will experience
immediate dilution in an amount that may be
material.
We have obtained approval from our stockholders for us to be
able to sell an unlimited number of shares of our common stock
at any level of discount from NAV per share in certain
circumstances during the one-year period ending on
December 11, 2010 as described in the accompanying
prospectus. The issuance or sale by us of shares of our common
stock at a discount to net asset value poses a risk of dilution
to our stockholders. In particular, stockholders who do not
purchase additional shares at or below the discounted price in
proportion to their current ownership will experience an
immediate decrease in NAV per share (as well as in the aggregate
NAV of their shares if they do not participate at all). These
stockholders will also experience a disproportionately greater
decrease in their participation in our earnings and assets and
their voting power than the increase we experience in our
assets, potential earning power and voting interests from such
issuance or sale. In addition, such sales may adversely affect
the price at which our common stock trades. For additional
information about recent sales below NAV per share, see
Recent Sales of Common Stock Below Net Asset Value
in this prospectus supplement and for additional information and
hypothetical examples of these risks, see Sales of Common
Stock Below Net Asset Value in this prospectus supplement
and in the accompanying prospectus.
S-5
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of our
common stock by the selling stockholders.
SELLING
STOCKHOLDERS
On September 24, 2009 we issued 2,807,111 shares at
$9.00 per share in a private stock offering. After giving effect
to this offering, the number of shares issued in the
September 24, 2009 offering represented 5.13% of the total
number of shares outstanding at such time. Concurrent with the
sale of these shares, we entered into a registration rights
agreement (Registration Rights Agreement) in which
we granted the purchasers certain registration rights with
respect to these shares. The prospectus and this prospectus
supplement are part of a registration statement that we filed
with the SEC utilizing a shelf or delayed offering process.
Under this offering process, and pursuant to the terms of the
Registration Rights Agreement, such purchasers may from time to
time resell these shares in one or more offerings. However, as
to any selling stockholder who is not an affiliate of the
Company, any registration rights granted pursuant to the
Registration Rights Agreement will expire six months after the
date the selling stockholder purchased such shares. Accordingly,
after March 21, 2010 any selling stockholder who is not an
affiliate of the Company will not be entitled to sell shares
pursuant to the registration statement and instead will be able
to sell shares pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities
Act of 1933, which provides a safe harbor to enable affiliates
and holders of unregistered shares of a public company to sell
such shares publicly subject to specified conditions and
limitations. As applied to the Company, Rule 144 permits
nonaffiliates to sell an unlimited number of shares held by them
for at least six months.
The term selling stockholder refers to purchasers in
the private stock offerings referred to above who wish to be
able to sell shares under this prospectus supplement and
includes donees, pledges, transferees, or other
successors-in-interest
selling securities received from the named selling stockholder
as a gift, pledge, stockholder distribution or other non-sale
related transfer after the date of the prospectus. Under the
rules of the SEC, beneficial ownership includes shares over
which the indicated beneficial owner exercises voting or
investment power. The inclusion of any securities in the
following table does not constitute an admission of beneficial
ownership by the persons named below.
S-6
The following table provides certain information with respect to
the selling stockholders, including their ownership of our
common stock as of February 26, 2010. The amounts set forth
below are based upon information provided to us by
representatives of such selling stockholders as of
February 26, 2010 and are accurate to the best of our
knowledge as of such date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Shares That May
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
Name
|
|
Before the Offering
|
|
|
Be Offered Hereby
|
|
|
After the Offering*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Jonathan M. Glaser and Nancy Ellen Glaser, TTEES of the Jonathan
and Nancy Glaser Family Trust,
DTD 12-16-98(1)
|
|
|
111,111
|
|
|
|
111,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kingsbrook Opportunities Master Fund LP(2)
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daybreak Special Situations Master Fund, Ltd.(3)
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cranshire Capital, L.P.(4)
|
|
|
9,911
|
|
|
|
9,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midsummer Investment, Ltd.(5)
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visium Equity Global Master Fund, Ltd.(6)
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RL Capital Partners(7)(8)
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highbridge International LLC(7)(9)
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hudson Bay Fund LP(10)
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hudson Bay Overseas Fund Ltd.(10)
|
|
|
128,000
|
|
|
|
128,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sutter Health Master Retirement Trust(11)
|
|
|
143,000
|
|
|
|
143,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sutter Health(11)
|
|
|
237,000
|
|
|
|
237,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Ventures International(7)(12)
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iroquois Master Fund Ltd.(13)
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sunsuper Barwon Private Equity Opp(14)
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
We do not know when or in what
amounts a selling stockholder may offer shares for sale. The
selling stockholders may choose not to sell any or all of the
shares offered by this prospectus supplement. Because the
selling stockholders may offer all or some of the shares
pursuant to this offering, and because there are currently no
agreements, arrangements or understanding with respect to the
sale of any of the shares, we cannot estimate the number of the
shares that will be held by the selling stockholders after
completion of the offering. However, for purposes of this table,
we have assumed that, after completion of the offering, none of
the shares covered by this prospectus supplement will be held by
the selling stockholders.
|
|
|
As of March 1, 2010, the
Company had 63,586,731 shares of common stock outstanding.
|
(1)
|
|
Jonathan M. Glaser, Trustee of the
selling stockholder, has investment power over the shares held
by the selling stockholder, including the power to dispose, or
to direct the disposition, of such shares.
|
(2)
|
|
Kingsbrook Partners LP
(Kingsbrook Partners), as investment advisor of the
selling stockholder, has investment power over the shares held
by the selling stockholder, including the power to dispose, or
to direct the disposition, of such shares. Kingsbrook
Opportunities GP LLC (Opportunities GP) is the
general partner of selling stockholder any may be considered the
beneficial owner of any securities deemed to be beneficially
owned by the selling stockholder. KB GP LLC (GP LLC)
is the general partner of Kingsbrook Partners and may be
considered the beneficial owner of any securities deemed to be
beneficially owned by Kingsbrook Partners. Ari J. Storch, Adam
J. Chill and Scott M. Wallace are the sole managing members of
Opportunities GP and GP LLC and as a result may be considered
beneficial owners of any securities deemed beneficially owned by
Opportunities GP and GP LLC. Each of Kingsbrook Partners,
Opportunities GP, GP LLC, and Messrs. Storch, Chill and
Wallace disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares.
|
(3)
|
|
Daybreak Capital Management LLC, as
investment advisor of the selling stockholder, has investment
power over the shares held by the selling stockholder, including
the power to dispose, or to direct the disposition, of such
shares. Mr. Lawrence J. Butz and Mr. John Prinz are
the managers of Daybreak Capital Management LLC. Each of
Daybreak Capital Management LLC and Messrs. Butz and Prinz
may by deemed to have beneficial ownership of the shares of
common stock beneficially held by the selling stockholder.
Daybreak Capital Management LLC and Messrs. Butz and Prinz
each disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares.
|
(4)
|
|
Downsview Capital, Inc.
(Downsview) is the general partner of
Cranshire Capital, L.P. (Cranshire) and consequently
has voting control and investment discretion over securities
held by Cranshire. Mitchell P. Kopin
(Mr. Kopin), President of Downsview, has voting
control over Downsview. As a result of the foregoing, each of
Mr. Kopin and Downsview may be
|
S-7
|
|
|
|
|
deemed to have beneficial ownership
(as determined under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended) of the shares of common stock
beneficially owned by Cranshire.
|
(5)
|
|
Michel A. Amsalem and Joshua Thomas
have investment power of over the shares held by the selling
stockholder, including the power to dispose, or to direct the
disposition, of such shares.
|
(6)
|
|
Visium Asset Management, LP, as
investment advisor of the selling stockholder, has investment
power over the shares held by the selling stockholder, including
the power to dispose, or to direct the disposition, of such
shares. JG Asset, LLC is the general partner of the Visium Asset
Management, LP and Jacob Gottlieb is the managing member of JG
Asset, LLC. Each of Visium Asset Management, LP, JG Asset, LLC
and Mr. Gottlieb may be deemed to have beneficial ownership
of the shares of common stock beneficially held by the selling
stockholder.
|
(7)
|
|
The selling stockholder has
identified itself to us as an affiliate of a broker-dealer(s)
and that it did not receive the shares of common stock outside
of the ordinary course of business nor, at the time of issuance
or purchase of the common stock, did it have any view to or
arrangements or understandings, directly or indirectly, with any
person to distribute the shares of common stock.
|
(8)
|
|
RL Capital Management LLC has
investment parent over the shares held by the selling
stockholder, including the power to dispose, or to direct the
disposition of such shares. Messrs. Ronald Lazar and
Anthony Polak are the managing members of RL Capital Management
LLC.
|
(9)
|
|
Highbridge Capital Management, LLC,
as trading manager of the selling stockholder, has investment
power over the shares held by the selling stockholder, including
the power to dispose, or to direct the disposition, of such
shares. Glen Dubin is the Chief Executive Officer of Highbridge
Capital Management, LLC. Each of Highbridge Capital Management,
LLC and Mr. Dubin disclaims any beneficial ownership of
such shares.
|
(10)
|
|
Sander Gerber has investment power
over the shares held by the selling stockholder, including the
power to dispose, or to direct the disposition, of such shares.
Mr. Gerber disclaims any beneficial ownership of the
securities held by the selling stockholder.
|
(11)
|
|
DePrince, Race & Zollo,
Inc., as investment advisor of the selling stockholders, has
investment power over the shares held by the selling
stockholder, including the power to dispose, or to direct the
disposition, of such shares.
|
(12)
|
|
Heights Capital Management, Inc.,
as authorized agent of the selling stockholder, has investment
power over the shares held by the selling stockholder, including
the power to dispose, or to direct the disposition, of such
shares and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of these
shares. Martin Kobinger, as investment manager of Heights
Capital Management, Inc., may be deemed to have beneficial
ownership of the shares of common stock beneficially held by the
selling stockholder and disclaims any beneficial ownership of
such shares.
|
(13)
|
|
Jonathan Silverman has investment
power over the shares held by the selling stockholder, including
the power to dispose, or to direct the disposition, of such
shares. Mr. Silverman disclaims beneficial ownership of
such shares.
|
(14)
|
|
Barwon Investment Partners has
investment power over the shares held by the selling
stockholder, including the power to dispose, or to direct the
disposition, of such shares.
|
S-8
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of
December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
on an actual basis; and
|
|
|
|
on an as adjusted basis giving effect to our distribution of
shares in connection with our dividend reinvestment plan on
January 25, 2010 and additional borrowings and the sale of
shares in connection with this offering (for which there is no
effect on capitalization as they are reflected in the previous
column);
|
This table should be read in conjunction with Use of
Proceeds and our Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and our financial statements and notes thereto included in this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Issuances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowing After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including current maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under senior credit facility(1)
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount owed to affiliates
|
|
|
7,412
|
|
|
|
7,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
17,412
|
|
|
|
32,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share
(100,000,000 common shares authorized;
63,349,746 shares outstanding actual,
63,586,731(2) shares outstanding as adjusted for stock
issuances in connection with our dividend reinvestment plan
completed after December 31, 2009)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
741,520
|
|
|
|
744,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income
|
|
|
(14,326
|
)
|
|
|
(14,326
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated realized losses on investments
|
|
|
(104,279
|
)
|
|
|
(104,279
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation on investments
|
|
|
14,499
|
|
|
|
14,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
637,477
|
|
|
|
640,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
654,889
|
|
|
$
|
672,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of December 31, 2009, we had $10 million of
borrowings outstanding under our credit facility. As of
March 5, 2010, we had $25.0 million of borrowings
under our credit facility, representing a $15.0 million
increase in borrowing subsequent to December 31, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 236,985 shares of our common stock issued on
January 25, 2010 in connection with our dividend
reinvestment plan. |
S-9
RECENT
SALES OF COMMON STOCK BELOW NET ASSET VALUE
At our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders held on
February 12, 2009 and our 2009 annual meeting of
stockholders held on December 11, 2009, our stockholders
approved our ability to sell an unlimited number of shares of
our common stock at any level of discount to NAV per share
during the twelve-month period following such approval.
Accordingly, we may make additional offerings of our common
stock without any limitation on the total amount of dilution to
stockholders. See Sales of Common Stock Below Net Asset
Value in this supplement and in the base prospectus.
Pursuant to this authority, we have made the following offerings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
Price Per Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Estimated Net Asset
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
Offering
|
|
to Investors
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Value Per Share
|
|
|
Dilution
|
|
|
March 18, 2009
|
|
$
|
8.20
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
14.43
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
%
|
April 27, 2009
|
|
$
|
7.75
|
|
|
|
3,680,000
|
|
|
$
|
14.15
|
|
|
|
5.05
|
%
|
May 26, 2009
|
|
$
|
8.25
|
|
|
|
7,762,500
|
|
|
$
|
13.44
|
|
|
|
7.59
|
%
|
July 7, 2009
|
|
$
|
9.00
|
|
|
|
5,175,000
|
|
|
$
|
12.40
|
|
|
|
3.37
|
%
|
August 20, 2009
|
|
$
|
8.50
|
|
|
|
3,449,686
|
|
|
$
|
11.57
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
%
|
September 24, 2009
|
|
$
|
9.00
|
|
|
|
2,807,111
|
|
|
$
|
11.36
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
%
|
S-10
DISTRIBUTIONS
AND PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
We have paid and intend to continue to distribute quarterly
distributions to our stockholders out of assets legally
available for distribution. Our distributions, if any, will be
determined by our Board of Directors. Certain amounts of the
quarterly distributions may from time to time be paid out of our
capital rather than from earnings for the quarter as a result of
our deliberate planning or by accounting reclassifications.
In order to maintain RIC tax treatment, we must distribute at
least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term
capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital
losses, if any, out of the assets legally available for
distribution. In order to avoid certain excise taxes imposed on
RICs, we are required to distribute with respect to each
calendar year by January 31 of the following year an amount at
least equal to the sum of
|
|
|
|
|
98% of our ordinary income for the calendar year,
|
|
|
|
98% of our capital gains in excess of capital losses for the
one-year period ending on October 31 of the calendar
year, and
|
|
|
|
any ordinary income and net capital gains for preceding years
that were not distributed during such years.
|
In December 2008, our Board of Directors elected to retain
excess profits generated in the quarter ended September 30,
2008 and pay a 4% excise tax on such retained earnings. We paid
$533,000 for the excise tax with the filing of our tax return in
March 2009.
In addition, although we currently intend to distribute realized
net capital gains (which we define as net long-term capital
gains in excess of short-term capital losses), if any, at least
annually, out of the assets legally available for such
distributions, we may decide in the future to retain such
capital gains for investment. In such event, the consequences of
our retention of net capital gains are as described under
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
in the accompanying prospectus. We can offer no assurance that
we will achieve results that will permit the payment of any cash
distributions and, if we issue senior securities, we will be
prohibited from making distributions if doing so causes us to
fail to maintain the asset coverage ratios stipulated by the
1940 Act or if distributions are limited by the terms of any of
our borrowings.
We maintain an opt out dividend reinvestment plan
for our common stockholders. As a result, if we declare a
dividend, then stockholders cash dividends will be
automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common
stock, unless they specifically opt out of the
dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash dividends.
Stockholders who receive distributions in the form of stock are
subject to the same U.S. Federal, state and local tax
consequences as are stockholders who elect to receive their
distributions in cash. See Dividend Reinvestment
Plan in the accompanying prospectus. The tax consequences
of distributions to stockholders are described in the
accompanying prospectus under the label Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations in the
accompanying prospectus. To the extent prudent and practicable,
we intend to declare and pay dividends on a quarterly basis.
With respect to the dividends paid to stockholders, income from
origination, structuring, closing, commitment and other upfront
fees associated with investments in portfolio companies were
treated as taxable income and accordingly, distributed to
stockholders. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009,
we paid total dividends of approximately $56.1 million. For
the first and second quarters of the fiscal year ending
June 30, 2010, we paid total distributions of approximately
$22.3 million and $25.9 million, respectively.
Tax characteristics of all distributions will be reported to
stockholders, as appropriate, on
Form 1099-DIV
after the end of the year. Our ability to pay distributions
could be affected by future business performance, liquidity,
capital needs, alternative investment opportunities and loan
covenants.
Our common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol PSEC. The following table sets
forth, for the periods indicated, our NAV per share of common
stock and the high and low closing prices per share of our
common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. Our
common stock historically trades at prices both above and below
its NAV. There can be no assurance, however, that such premium
or discount, as applicable, to NAV will be maintained. Common
stock of business development companies, like that of closed-end
investment companies, frequently trades at a discount to current
NAV. In the past, our common stock has traded
S-11
at a discount to our NAV. The risk that our common stock may
continue to trade at a discount to our NAV is separate and
distinct from the risk that our NAV per share may decline.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Price
|
|
|
(Discount) of
|
|
|
(Discount) of
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
|
NAV(1)
|
|
|
High(2)
|
|
|
Low(2)
|
|
|
High to NAV
|
|
|
Low to NAV
|
|
|
Declared
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ending June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
13.67
|
|
|
$
|
15.45
|
|
|
$
|
14.42
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
13.74
|
|
|
|
15.15
|
|
|
|
11.63
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.100
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
13.74
|
|
|
|
13.72
|
|
|
|
10.61
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(22.8
|
)%
|
|
|
0.125
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
14.59
|
|
|
|
13.47
|
|
|
|
12.27
|
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(15.9
|
)%
|
|
|
0.150
|
|
Twelve Months Ending June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
14.60
|
|
|
$
|
13.60
|
|
|
$
|
11.06
|
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(24.2
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.200
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
14.69
|
|
|
|
15.46
|
|
|
|
12.84
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
(12.6
|
)%
|
|
|
0.280
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
14.81
|
|
|
|
16.64
|
|
|
|
15.00
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.300
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
15.31
|
|
|
|
17.07
|
|
|
|
15.83
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.340
|
|
Twelve Months Ending June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
14.86
|
|
|
$
|
16.77
|
|
|
$
|
15.30
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.380
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
15.24
|
|
|
|
18.79
|
|
|
|
15.60
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.385
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
15.18
|
|
|
|
17.68
|
|
|
|
16.40
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.3875
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
15.04
|
|
|
|
18.68
|
|
|
|
16.91
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
%
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.390
|
|
Twelve Months Ending June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
15.08
|
|
|
$
|
18.68
|
|
|
$
|
14.16
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
%
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.3925
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
14.58
|
|
|
|
17.17
|
|
|
|
11.22
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
(23.0
|
)%
|
|
|
0.395
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
14.15
|
|
|
|
16.00
|
|
|
|
13.55
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
|
|
0.400
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
14.55
|
|
|
|
16.12
|
|
|
|
13.18
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)%
|
|
|
0.40125
|
|
Twelve Months Ending June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
14.63
|
|
|
$
|
14.24
|
|
|
$
|
11.12
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(24.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.4025
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
14.43
|
|
|
|
13.08
|
|
|
|
6.29
|
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(56.4
|
)%
|
|
|
0.40375
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
14.19
|
|
|
|
12.89
|
|
|
|
6.38
|
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(55.0
|
)%
|
|
|
0.405
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
12.40
|
|
|
|
10.48
|
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
|
|
(15.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(35.9
|
)%
|
|
|
0.40625
|
|
Twelve Months Ending June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
11.11
|
|
|
$
|
10.99
|
|
|
$
|
8.82
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(20.6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.4075
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
12.31
|
|
|
|
9.93
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
0.40875
|
|
Third quarter (to 3/5/10)
|
|
|
(3
|
)(4)
|
|
|
13.20
|
|
|
|
10.45
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net asset value per share is determined as of the last day in
the relevant quarter and therefore may not reflect the net asset
value per share on the date of the high or low sales price. The
NAVs shown are based on outstanding shares at the end of each
period. |
|
(2) |
|
The High/Low Stock Price is calculated as of the closing price
on a given day in the applicable quarter. |
|
(3) |
|
Our most recently determined NAV per share was $10.06 as of
December 31, 2009 ($10.07 on an as adjusted basis solely to
give effect to our issuance of common stock on January 25,
2010 in connection with our dividend reinvestment plan). NAV as
of March 31, 2010 may be higher or lower than $10.07
based on potential changes in valuations as of March 31,
2010. |
|
(4) |
|
NAV has not yet been finally determined for any day after
December 31, 2009. |
|
(5) |
|
The dividend for the third quarter of 2010 will be declared in
March 2010. |
On March 5, 2010, the last reported sales price of our
common stock was $12.10 per share.
As of March 5, 2010, we had approximately
58 stockholders of record.
The below table sets forth each class of our outstanding
securities as of March 5, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
Amount Held by
|
|
|
Amount Outstanding
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Registrant or for
|
|
|
Exclusive of Amount
|
|
Title of Class
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
its Account
|
|
|
Shown Under(3)
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
63,586,731
|
|
S-12
SALES OF
COMMON STOCK BELOW NET ASSET VALUE
At our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders held on
February 12, 2009 and our 2009 annual meeting of
stockholders held on December 11, 2009, our stockholders
approved our ability to sell an unlimited number of shares of
our common stock at any level of discount from net asset value
(NAV) per share during the twelve-month period following such
approval. In order to sell shares pursuant to this authorization
a majority of our directors who have no financial interest in
the sale and a majority of our independent directors must
(a) find that the sale is in our best interests and in the
best interests of our stockholders, and (b) in consultation
with any underwriter or underwriters of the offering, make a
good faith determination as of a time either immediately prior
to the first solicitation by us or on our behalf of firm
commitments to purchase such shares, or immediately prior to the
issuance of such shares, that the price at which such shares are
to be sold is not less than a price which closely approximates
the market value of such shares, less any distributing
commission or discount.
In making a determination that an offering below NAV per share
is in our and our stockholders best interests, our Board
of Directors would consider a variety of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
The effect that an offering below NAV per share would have on
our stockholders, including the potential dilution they would
experience as a result of the offering;
|
|
|
|
The amount per share by which the offering price per share and
the net proceeds per share are less than the most recently
determined NAV per share;
|
|
|
|
The relationship of recent market prices of par common stock to
NAV per share and the potential impact of the offering on the
market price per share of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
Whether the estimated offering price would closely approximate
the market value of our shares;
|
|
|
|
The potential market impact of being able to raise capital
during the current financial market difficulties;
|
|
|
|
The nature of any new investors anticipated to acquire shares in
the offering;
|
|
|
|
The anticipated rate of return on and quality, type and
availability of investments; and
|
|
|
|
The leverage available to us.
|
Our Board of Directors would also consider the fact that sales
of common stock at a discount will benefit our Advisor as the
Advisor will earn additional investment management fees on the
proceeds of such offerings, as it would from the offering of any
other securities of the Company or from the offering of common
stock at premium to NAV per share.
We will not sell shares under a prospectus supplement to the
registration statement or current post-effective amendment
thereto of which this prospectus forms a part (the current
registration statement) if the cumulative dilution to our
NAV per share from offerings under the current registration
statement exceeds 15%. This limit would be measured separately
for each offering pursuant to the current amendment by
calculating the percentage dilution or accretion to aggregate
NAV from that offering and then summing the percentage from each
offering. For example, if our most recently determined NAV at
the time of the first offering is $10.06 and we have
64 million shares outstanding, sale of 16 million
shares at net proceeds to us of $5.03 per share (a 50% discount)
would produce dilution of 10.00%. If we subsequently determined
that our NAV per share increased to $11.00 on the then
80 million shares outstanding and then made an additional
offering, we could, for example, sell approximately an
additional 8.885 million shares at net proceeds to us of
$5.50 per share, which would produce dilution of 5.00%, before
we would reach the aggregate 15% limit. If we file a new
post-effective amendment, the threshold would reset.
Sales by us of our common stock at a discount from NAV pose
potential risks for our existing stockholders whether or not
they participate in the offering, as well as for new investors
who participate in the offering.
S-13
The following three headings and accompanying tables will
explain and provide hypothetical examples on the impact of an
offering at a price less than NAV per share on three different
set of investors:
|
|
|
|
|
existing shareholders who do not purchase any shares in the
offering;
|
|
|
|
existing shareholders who purchase a relatively small amount of
shares in the offering or a relatively large amount of shares in
the offering; and
|
|
|
|
new investors who become shareholders by purchasing shares in
the offering.
|
Impact On
Existing Stockholders Who Do Not Participate in the
Offering
Our existing stockholders who do not participate in an offering
below NAV per share or who do not buy additional shares in the
secondary market at the same or lower price we obtain in the
offering (after expenses and commissions) face the greatest
potential risks. These stockholders will experience an immediate
decrease (often called dilution) in the NAV of the shares they
hold and their NAV per share. These stockholders will also
experience a disproportionately greater decrease in their
participation in our earnings and assets and their voting power
than the increase we will experience in our assets, potential
earning power and voting interests due to the offering. These
shareholders may also experience a decline in the market price
of their shares, which often reflects to some degree announced
or potential increases and decreases in NAV per share. This
decrease could be more pronounced as the size of the offering
and level of discounts increases.
The following chart illustrates the level of NAV dilution that
would be experienced by a nonparticipating stockholder in three
different hypothetical offerings of different sizes and levels
of discount from NAV per share. It is not possible to predict
the level of market price decline that may occur.
The examples assume that the issuer has 64,000,000 common shares
outstanding, $700,000,000 in total assets and $56,160,000 in
total liabilities. The current NAV and NAV per share are thus
$643,840,000 and $10.06. The chart illustrates the dilutive
effect on Stockholder A of (1) an offering of
3,200,000 shares (5% of the outstanding shares) at $9.56
per share after offering expenses and commission (a 5% discount
from NAV), (2) an offering of 6,400,000 shares (10% of
the outstanding shares) at $9.05 per share after offering
expenses and commissions (a 10% discount from NAV) and
(3) an offering of 12,800,000 shares (20% of the
outstanding shares) at $8.05 per share after offering expenses
and commissions (a 20% discount from NAV). The prospectus
supplement pursuant to which any discounted offering is made
will include a chart based on the actual number of shares in
such offering and the actual discount to the most recently
determined NAV, as applicable.
S-14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example 1
|
|
|
Example 2
|
|
|
Example 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% Offering
|
|
|
10% Offering
|
|
|
20% Offering
|
|
|
|
Prior to
|
|
|
at 5% Discount
|
|
|
at 10% Discount
|
|
|
at 20% Discount
|
|
|
|
Sale Below
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
NAV
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Offering Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per Share to Public
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds per Share to Issuer
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease to NAV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
64,000,000
|
|
|
|
67,200,000
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
70,400,000
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
76,800,000
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
%
|
NAV per Share
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
10.04
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.97
|
|
|
|
(0.91
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
Dilution to Nonparticipating Stockholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Percentage Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
|
(4.76
|
)%
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
|
|
(9.09
|
)%
|
|
|
0.08
|
%
|
|
|
(16.67
|
)%
|
Total NAV Held by Stockholder A
|
|
$
|
643,840
|
|
|
$
|
642,307
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
$
|
637,987
|
|
|
|
(0.91
|
)%
|
|
$
|
622,379
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
Total Investment by Stockholder A (Assumed to be $10.06 per
Share)
|
|
$
|
643,840
|
|
|
$
|
643,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
643,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
643,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dilution to Stockholder A (Total NAV Less Total
Investment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,553
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5,853
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(21,461
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per Share Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment per Share Held by Stockholder A (Assumed to be
$10.06 per Share on Shares Held Prior to Sale)
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per Share Held by Stockholder A (NAV per Share
Less Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Dilution to Stockholder A (Dilution per Share
Divided by Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.91
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
Impact On
Existing Stockholders Who Do Participate in the
Offering
Our existing stockholders who participate in an offering below
NAV per share or who buy additional shares in the secondary
market at the same or lower price as we obtain in the offering
(after expenses and commissions) will experience the same types
of NAV dilution as the nonparticipating stockholders, albeit at
a lower level, to the extent they purchase less than the same
percentage of the discounted offering as their interest in our
shares immediately prior to the offering. The level of NAV
dilution will decrease as the number of shares such stockholders
purchase increases. Existing stockholders who buy more than such
percentage will experience NAV dilution but will, in contrast to
existing stockholders who purchase less than their proportionate
share of the offering, experience an increase (often called
accretion) in NAV per share over their investment per share and
will also experience a disproportionately greater increase in
their participation in our earnings and assets and their voting
power than our increase in assets, potential earning power and
voting interests due to the offering. The level of accretion
will increase as the excess number of shares such stockholder
purchases increases. Even a stockholder who overparticipates
will, however, be subject to the risk that we may make
additional discounted offerings in which such stockholder does
not participate, in which case such a stockholder will
experience NAV dilution as described above in such subsequent
offerings. These shareholders may also experience a decline in
the market price of their shares, which often reflects to some
degree announced or potential increases and decreases in NAV per
share. This decrease could be more pronounced as the size of the
offering and level of discounts increases.
The following chart illustrates the level of dilution and
accretion in the hypothetical 20% discount offering from the
prior chart (Example 3) for a stockholder that acquires
shares equal to (1) 50% of its proportionate share of the
offering (i.e., 6,400 shares, which is 0.05% of an offering
of 12,800,000 shares) rather than its 0.10% proportionate
share and (2) 150% of such percentage (i.e.
19,200 shares, which is 0.15% of an offering of
12,800,000 shares rather than its 0.10% proportionate
share). The prospectus supplement pursuant to which any
discounted offering is made will include a chart for these
examples based on the actual number of shares in such offering
and the actual discount from the most recently determined NAV
per share, as applicable. It is not possible to predict the
level of market price decline that may occur.
S-15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
150%
|
|
|
|
Prior to
|
|
|
Participation
|
|
|
Participation
|
|
|
|
Sale Below
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
NAV
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Offering Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per Share to Public
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds per Share to Issuer
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease/Increase to NAV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
64,000,000
|
|
|
|
76,800,000
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
%
|
|
|
76,800,000
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
%
|
NAV per Share
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
Dilution/Accretion to Participating Stockholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
70,400
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
83,200
|
|
|
|
30.00
|
%
|
Percentage Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
|
|
(8.33
|
)%
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
|
|
8.33
|
%
|
Total NAV Held by Stockholder A
|
|
$
|
643,840
|
|
|
$
|
684,617
|
|
|
|
6.33
|
%
|
|
$
|
809,092
|
|
|
|
25.67
|
%
|
Total Investment by Stockholder A (Assumed to be $10.06 per
Share on Shares held Prior to Sale)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
698,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
806,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dilution/Accretion to Stockholder A (Total NAV Less Total
Investment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13,441
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per Share Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment per Share Held by Stockholder A (Assumed to Be $10.06
on Shares Held Prior to Sale)
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
9.91
|
|
|
|
(1.44
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.69
|
|
|
|
(3.64
|
)%
|
Dilution/Accretion per Share Held by Stockholder A (NAV per
Share Less Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Dilution/Accretion to Stockholder A
(Dilution/Accretion per Share Divided by Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.93
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
%
|
Impact On
New Investors
Investors who are not currently stockholders and who participate
in an offering below NAV but whose investment per share is
greater than the resulting NAV per share due to selling
compensation and expenses paid by the issuer will experience an
immediate decrease, albeit small, in the NAV of their shares and
their NAV per share compared to the price they pay for their
shares. Investors who are not currently stockholders and who
participate in an offering below NAV per share and whose
investment per share is also less than the resulting NAV per
share due to selling compensation and expenses paid by the
issuer being significantly less than the discount per share will
experience an immediate increase in the NAV of their shares and
their NAV per share compared to the price they pay for their
shares. These investors will experience a disproportionately
greater participation in our earnings and assets and their
voting power than our increase in assets, potential earning
power and voting interests. These investors will, however, be
subject to the risk that we may make additional discounted
offerings in which such new stockholder does not participate, in
which case such new stockholder will experience dilution as
described above in such subsequent offerings. These investors
may also experience a decline in the market price of their
shares, which often reflects to some degree announced or
potential increases and decreases in NAV per share. This
decrease could be more pronounced as the size of the offering
and level of discounts increases.
The following chart illustrates the level of dilution or
accretion for new investors that would be experienced by a new
investor in the same hypothetical 5%, 10% and 20% discounted
offerings as described in the first chart above. The
illustration is for a new investor who purchases the same
percentage (0.10%) of the shares in the offering as Stockholder
A in the prior examples held immediately prior to the offering.
The prospectus supplement pursuant to which any discounted
offering is made will include a chart for these examples based
on the actual number of shares in such offering and the actual
discount from the most recently determined NAV per share, as
applicable. It is not possible to predict the level of market
price decline that may occur.
S-16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example 1
|
|
|
Example 2
|
|
|
Example 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% Offering
|
|
|
10% Offering
|
|
|
20% Offering
|
|
|
|
Prior to
|
|
|
at 5% Discount
|
|
|
at 10% Discount
|
|
|
at 20% Discount
|
|
|
|
Sale Below
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
NAV
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Offering Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per Share to Public
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds per Share to Issuer
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease/Increase to NAV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
64,000,000
|
|
|
|
67,200,000
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
70,400,000
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
76,800,000
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
%
|
NAV per Share
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
10.04
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.97
|
|
|
|
(0.91
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
Dilution/Accretion to New Investor A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held by Investor A
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Held by Investor A
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Total NAV Held by Investor A
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
32,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
63,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
124,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment by Investor A (At Price to Public)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
108,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dilution/Accretion to Investor A (Total NAV Less
Total Investment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per Share Held by Investor A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment per Share Held by Investor A
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution/Accretion per Share Held by Investor A (NAV per
Share Less Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Dilution/Accretion to Investor A
(Dilution/Accretion per Share Divided by Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.79
|
%
|
S-17
PLAN OF
DISTRIBUTION
We previously issued shares representing 2,807,111 shares
of our common stock to the selling stockholders in connection
with a private stock offering. This prospectus supplement
relates to the offer and sale of up to 2,092,022 of such shares
of our common stock, as certain of the selling stockholders
previously sold shares under a separate prospectus supplement.
The registration of the common stock does not necessarily mean
that any or all of the shares will be offered or sold by the
selling stockholders under this prospectus supplement.
We will bear all of the expenses that we incur in connection
with the offering of our shares of common stock under this
prospectus supplement. Total expenses payable by us in
connection with the offering were reported as a cost of the
original issuance of the shares by us; provided, however, that a
selling stockholder will pay all underwriting discounts and
selling commissions, if any. We will indemnify the selling
stockholders against liabilities, including some liabilities
under the Securities Act of 1933, in accordance with the
Registration Rights Agreement, or the selling stockholders will
be entitled to contribution. We may be indemnified by the
selling stockholders against civil liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, that may arise
from any written information furnished to us by the selling
stockholder specifically for use in this prospectus, in
accordance with the related Registration Rights Agreement, or we
may be entitled to contribution.
Pursuant to the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement
entered into by the Company, the selling stockholders may resell
shares of our common stock under this prospectus supplement. The
selling stockholders may sell common stock from time to time in
one or more of the following types of transactions (including
block transactions): (i) on any national exchange on which
the shares may be listed or any automatic quotation system
through which the shares may be quoted, (ii) in the
over-the-counter market, (iii) in privately negotiated
transactions, (iv) through put and call transactions,
(v) through short sales, (vi) by pledge to secure
debts and other obligations, (vii) to cover hedging
transactions, (viii) through the issuance of derivative
securities, including warrants, exchangeable securities,
(ix) forward delivery contracts and the writing of options,
underwritten offerings, (x) a combination of such methods
of sale, and (xi) any other legally available means. The
sales may be made at prevailing market prices at the time of
sale or at privately negotiated prices. The selling stockholders
may use brokers, dealers or agents to sell their respective
shares. The persons acting as agents may receive compensation in
the form of commissions, discounts or concessions. This
compensation may be paid by the selling stockholders or the
purchasers of the shares for whom the selling stockholders may
act as agent, or to whom the selling stockholders may sell as a
principal, or both.
The selling stockholders may enter into hedging transactions
with broker-dealers or other financial institutions. In
connection with these transactions, broker-dealers or other
financial institutions may engage in short sales of the shares
in the course of hedging positions they assume with the selling
stockholders. The selling stockholders may also enter into
options or other transactions with broker-dealers or other
financial institutions which require the delivery to these
broker-dealers or other financial institutions of shares, which
such broker-dealer or other financial institution may resell
under this prospectus supplement (as amended or supplemented to
reflect such transaction). The selling stockholders may also
engage in short sales of shares and, in those instances, the
prospectus supplement may be delivered in connection with the
short sales and the shares offered pursuant to the prospectus
supplement may be used to cover the short sales. The selling
stockholders and any broker-dealer participating in the
distribution of the shares of common stock may be deemed to be
underwriters within the meaning of the Securities
Act of 1933, and any commission paid, or any discounts or
concessions allowed to, any such broker-dealer may be deemed to
be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities
Act of 1933. At the time a particular offering of the shares of
common stock is made, a prospectus supplement, if required, will
be distributed which will set forth the aggregate amount of
shares of common stock being offered and the terms of the
offering, including the name or names of any broker-dealers or
agents, any discounts, commissions and other terms constituting
compensation from the selling stockholders and any discounts,
commissions or concessions allowed or reallowed or paid to
broker-dealers.
The selling stockholders may choose not to sell any or may
choose to sell less than all of the shares of common stock
registered pursuant to the registration statement, of which this
prospectus supplement forms a part. Once sold under the
registration statement, of which this prospectus supplement
forms a part, the shares of common stock will be freely tradable
in the hands of persons other than our affiliates.
S-18
In order to comply with the securities laws of most states, if
applicable, the selling stockholders may only sell shares of
common stock in those jurisdictions through registered or
licensed brokers or dealers. In addition, in some states the
shares of common stock may not be sold unless they have been
registered or qualified for sale or an exemption from
registration or qualification requirements is available and is
complied with.
The selling stockholders and any other person participating in a
distribution of the securities covered by the prospectus
supplement will be subject to applicable provisions of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and
regulations thereunder, including Regulation M, which may
limit the timing of purchases and sales of any of the securities
by the selling stockholders and any other such person.
Furthermore, under Regulation M, any person engaged in the
distribution of the securities may not simultaneously engage in
market-making activities with respect to the particular
securities being distributed for certain periods prior to the
commencement of or during such distribution.
Regulation Ms prohibition on purchases may include
purchases to cover short positions by the selling stockholders,
and a selling stockholders failure to cover a short
position at a lenders request and subsequent purchases by
the lender in the open market of shares to cover such short
positions, may be deemed to constitute an inducement to buy
shares, which is prohibited by Regulation M. All of the
above may affect the marketability of the securities and the
ability of any person or entity to engage in market-making
activities with respect to the securities.
Certain selling stockholders have identified themselves to us as
affiliates of broker-dealers. The selling stockholders who are
affiliates of broker-dealers have each informed us that that
they did not receive the shares of common stock outside of the
ordinary course of business nor, at the time of issuance or
purchase of the common stock, did they have any view to or
arrangements or understandings, directly or indirectly, with any
person to distribute the shares of common stock.
Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol PSEC.
LEGAL
MATTERS
Certain legal matters regarding the common stock offered hereby
have been passed upon for the Company by Skadden, Arps, Slate,
Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, New York, and Venable
LLP as special Maryland counsel.
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BDO Seidman LLP is the independent registered public accounting
firm for the Company.
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form N-2,
together with all amendments and related exhibits, under the
Securities Act of 1933, with respect to our common stock offered
by this prospectus supplement. The registration statement
contains additional information about us and the common stock
being registered by this prospectus supplement. We file with or
submit to the SEC annual, quarterly and current periodic
reports, proxy statements and other information meeting the
informational requirements of the Exchange Act. This information
and the information specifically regarding how we voted proxies
relating to portfolio securities for the period ended
June 30, 2009, are available free of charge by contacting
us at 10 East 40th Street, 44th floor, New York,
NY 10016 or by telephone at toll-free
(888) 748-0702.
You may inspect and copy these reports, proxy statements and
other information, as well as the registration statement and
related exhibits and schedules, at the Public Reference Room of
the SEC at 100 F Street NE,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on
the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at
(202) 551-8090.
The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy
and information statements and other information filed
electronically by us with the SEC which are available on the
SECs Internet site at
http://www.sec.gov.
Copies of these reports, proxy and information statements and
other information may be obtained, after paying a duplicating
fee, by electronic request at the following
E-mail
address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SECs Public
Reference Section,
Washington, D.C. 20549-0102.
S-19
No dealer, salesperson or other individual has been authorized
to give any information or to make any representation other than
those contained in this prospectus supplement and, if given or
made, such information or representations must not be relied
upon as having been authorized by us. This prospectus supplement
does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an
offer to buy any securities in any jurisdiction in which such an
offer or solicitation is not authorized or in which the person
making such offer or solicitation is not qualified to do so, or
to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or
solicitation. Neither the delivery of this prospectus supplement
nor any sale made hereunder shall, under any circumstances,
create any implication that there has been no change in our
affairs or that information contained herein is correct as of
any time subsequent to the date hereof.
S-20
$500,000,000
PROSPECT CAPITAL
CORPORATION
Common Stock
Preferred Stock
Debt Securities
Warrants
We may offer, from time to time, in one or more offerings or
series, together or separately, up to $500,000,000 of our common
stock, preferred stock, debt securities or rights to purchase
shares of common stock, preferred stock or debt securities,
collectively, the Securities, to provide us with additional
capital. Securities may be offered at prices and on terms to be
disclosed in one or more supplements to this prospectus. You
should read this prospectus and the applicable prospectus
supplement carefully before you invest in our Securities.
We may offer shares of common stock at a discount to net asset
value per share in certain circumstances. Sales of common stock
at prices below net asset value per share dilute the interests
of existing stockholders, have the effect of reducing our net
asset value per share and may reduce our market price per share.
Our Securities may be offered directly to one or more
purchasers, or through agents designated from time to time by
us, or to or through underwriters or dealers. The prospectus
supplement relating to the offering will identify any agents or
underwriters involved in the sale of our Securities, and will
disclose any applicable purchase price, fee, commission or
discount arrangement between us and our agents or underwriters
or among our underwriters or the basis upon which such amount
may be calculated. See Plan of Distribution. We may
not sell any of our Securities through agents, underwriters or
dealers without delivery of the prospectus and a prospectus
supplement describing the method and terms of the offering of
such Securities. Our common stock is traded on The NASDAQ Global
Select Market under the symbol PSEC. As of February
25 2010, the last reported sales price for our common stock was
$11.66.
Prospect Capital Corporation, or the Company, is a company that
lends to and invests in middle market privately-held companies.
Prospect Capital Corporation, a Maryland corporation, has been
organized as a closed-end investment company since
April 13, 2004 and has filed an election to be treated as a
business development company under the Investment Company Act of
1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act, and is a non-diversified
investment company within the meaning of the 1940 Act.
Prospect Capital Management LLC, our investment adviser, manages
our investments and Prospect Administration LLC, our
administrator, provides the administrative services necessary
for us to operate.
Investing in our Securities involves a heightened risk of
total loss of investment and is subject to risks. Before buying
any Securities, you should read the discussion of the material
risks of investing in our Securities in Risk Factors
beginning on page 9 of this prospectus.
This prospectus contains important information about us that you
should know before investing in our Securities. Please read it
before making an investment decision and keep it for future
reference. We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy
statements and other information about us with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. You may make inquiries or
obtain this information free of charge by writing to Prospect
Capital Corporation at 10 East 40th Street,
44th Floor, New York, NY 10016, or by calling
212-448-0702.
Our Internet address is
http://www.prospectstreet.com.
You may also obtain information about us from our website and
the SECs website
(http://www.sec.gov).
The SEC has not approved or disapproved of these securities
or determined if this prospectus supplement or the accompanying
prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the
contrary is a criminal offense.
This prospectus may not be used to consummate sales of
securities unless accompanied by a prospectus supplement.
The date of this Prospectus is March 4, 2010
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
i
ABOUT
THIS PROSPECTUS
This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we have
filed with the SEC, using the shelf registration
process. Under the shelf registration process, we may offer,
from time to time on a delayed basis, up to $500,000,000 of our
common stock, preferred stock, debt securities or warrants
representing rights to purchase shares of our common stock,
preferred stock or debt securities on the terms to be determined
at the time of the offering. The Securities may be offered at
prices and on terms described in one or more supplements to this
prospectus. This prospectus provides you with a general
description of the Securities that we may offer. Each time we
use this prospectus to offer Securities, we will provide a
prospectus supplement that will contain specific information
about the terms of that offering. The prospectus supplement may
also add, update or change information contained in this
prospectus. Please carefully read this prospectus and any
prospectus supplement together with any exhibits and the
additional information described under the heading
Available Information and the section under the
heading Risk Factors before you make an investment
decision.
1
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
The following summary contains basic information about this
offering. It does not contain all the information that may be
important to an investor. For a more complete understanding of
this offering, we encourage you to read this entire document and
the documents to which we have referred.
Information contained or incorporated by reference in this
prospectus may contain forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995, which are statements about the future that may be
identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as
may, will, expect,
intend, plans, anticipate,
estimate or continue or the negative
thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.
These forward-looking statements do not meet the safe harbor for
forward-looking statements pursuant to Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act. The
matters described in Risk Factors and certain other
factors noted throughout this prospectus and in any exhibits to
the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part,
constitute cautionary statements identifying important factors
with respect to any such forward-looking statements, including
certain risks and uncertainties, that could cause actual results
to differ materially from those in such forward-looking
statements. The Company reminds all investors that no
forward-looking statement can be relied upon as an accurate or
even mostly accurate forecast because humans cannot forecast the
future.
The terms we, us, our,
and Company refer to Prospect Capital Corporation;
Prospect Capital Management or the Investment
Adviser refers to Prospect Capital Management LLC, our
investment adviser; Prospect Administration or the
Administrator refers to Prospect Administration LLC,
our administrator; and Prospect refers to Prospect
Capital Management LLC, its affiliates and its predecessor
companies.
The
Company
We are a financial services company that lends to and invests in
middle market privately-held companies.
We were originally organized under the name Prospect
Street Energy Corporation and we changed our name to
Prospect Energy Corporation in June 2004. We changed
our name again to Prospect Capital Corporation in
May 2007 and at the same time terminated our policy of investing
at least 80% of our net assets in energy companies. While we
expect to be less focused on the energy industry in the future,
we will continue to have significant holdings in the energy and
energy related industries. On December 2, 2009, we
completed our previously announced acquisition of Patriot
Capital Funding, Inc., or Patriot, under the Agreement and Plan
of Merger, dated as of August 3, 2009, by and among, us and
Patriot. Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, we
acquired Patriot for approximately $200 million comprised
of our common stock and cash to repay all of Patriots
outstanding debt, which amounted to $107.3 million. In the
merger, each outstanding share of Patriot common stock was
converted into the right to receive 0.363992 shares of
common stock of Prospect, representing 8,444,068 shares of
the Companys common stock, and the payment of cash in lieu
of fractional shares of Prospect common stock of less than $200
resulting from the application of the foregoing exchange ratio.
We have been organized as a closed-end investment company since
April 13, 2004 and have filed an election to be treated as
a business development company under the 1940 Act. We are a
non-diversified company within the meaning of the 1940 Act. Our
headquarters are located at 10 East 40th Street,
44th Floor, New York, NY 10016, and our telephone number is
(212) 448-0702.
The
Investment Adviser
Prospect Capital Management, an affiliate of the Company,
manages our investment activities. Prospect Capital Management
is an investment adviser that has been registered under the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, or the Advisers Act, since
March 31, 2004. Under an investment advisory and management
agreement between us and Prospect Capital Management, or the
Investment Advisory Agreement, we have agreed to pay Prospect
Capital Management investment advisory fees, which will consist
of an annual base management fee based on our gross assets,
which we define as total assets without deduction for any
liabilities, as well as a two-part incentive fee based on our
performance.
2
The
Offering
We may offer, from time to time, in one or more offerings or
series, together or separately, up to $500,000,000 of our
Securities, which we expect to use initially to maintain balance
sheet liquidity, involving repayment of debt under our credit
facility, investment in high quality short-term debt instruments
or a combination thereof, and thereafter to make long-term
investments in accordance with our investment objectives.
Our Securities may be offered directly to one or more
purchasers, through agents designated from time to time by us,
or to or through underwriters or dealers. The prospectus
supplement relating to a particular offering will disclose the
terms of that offering, including the name or names of any
agents or underwriters involved in the sale of our Securities by
us, the purchase price, and any fee, commission or discount
arrangement between us and our agents or underwriters or among
our underwriters, or the basis upon which such amount may be
calculated. See Plan of Distribution. We may not
sell any of our Securities through agents, underwriters or
dealers without delivery of a prospectus supplement describing
the method and terms of the offering of our Securities.
We may sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to
acquire our common stock, at a price below the current net asset
value of our common stock upon approval of our directors,
including a majority of our independent directors, in certain
circumstances. See Sales of Common Stock Below Net Asset
Value in this prospectus and in the prospectus supplement,
if applicable. Sales of common stock at prices below net asset
value per share dilute the interests of existing stockholders,
have the effect of reducing our net asset value per share and
may reduce our market price per share.
Set forth below is additional information regarding the offering
of our Securities:
|
|
|
Use of proceeds |
|
Unless otherwise specified in a prospectus supplement, we intend
to use the net proceeds from selling Securities pursuant to this
prospectus initially to maintain balance sheet liquidity,
involving repayment of debt under our credit facility,
investments in high quality short-term debt instruments or a
combination thereof, and thereafter to make long-term
investments in accordance with our investment objective. See
Use of Proceeds. |
|
Distributions |
|
We have paid quarterly distributions to the holders of our
common stock and generally intend to continue to do so. The
amount of the quarterly distributions is determined by our Board
of Directors and is based on our estimate of our investment
company taxable income and net short-term capital gains. Certain
amounts of the quarterly distributions may from time to time be
paid out of our capital rather than from earnings for the
quarter as a result of our deliberate planning or accounting
reclassifications. Distributions in excess of our current or
accumulated earnings or profits constitute a return of capital
and will reduce the stockholders adjusted tax basis in
such stockholders common stock. After the adjusted basis
is reduced to zero, these distributions will constitute capital
gains to such stockholders. Certain additional amounts may be
deemed as distributed to stockholders for income tax purposes.
Other types of Securities will likely pay distributions in
accordance with their terms. See Price Range of Common
Stock, Distributions and Material U.S.
Federal Income Tax Considerations. |
|
Taxation |
|
We have qualified and elected to be treated for U.S. Federal
income tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or a RIC,
under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or the
Code. As a RIC, we generally do not have to pay
corporate-level U.S. Federal income taxes on any ordinary
income or capital gains that we distribute to our stockholders
as dividends. To maintain our qualification |
3
|
|
|
|
|
as a RIC and obtain RIC tax treatment, we must maintain
specified
source-of-income
and asset diversification requirements and distribute annually
at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term
capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital
losses, if any. See Distributions and Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations. |
|
Dividend reinvestment plan |
|
We have a dividend reinvestment plan for our stockholders. This
is an opt out dividend reinvestment plan. As a
result, when we declare a dividend, the dividends are
automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common
stock, unless a stockholder specifically opts out of
the dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash dividends.
Stockholders who receive distributions in the form of stock are
subject to the same U.S. Federal, state and local tax
consequences as stockholders who elect to receive their
distributions in cash. See Dividend Reinvestment
Plan. |
|
The NASDAQ Global Select Market Symbol |
|
PSEC |
|
Anti-takeover provisions |
|
Our charter and bylaws, as well as certain statutory and
regulatory requirements, contain provisions that may have the
effect of discouraging a third party from making an acquisition
proposal for us. These anti-takeover provisions may inhibit a
change in control in circumstances that could give the holders
of our common stock the opportunity to realize a premium over
the market price of our common stock. See Description Of
Our Capital Stock. |
|
Management arrangements |
|
Prospect Capital Management serves as our investment adviser.
Prospect Administration serves as our administrator. For a
description of Prospect Capital Management, Prospect
Administration and our contractual arrangements with these
companies, see Management Management
Services Investment Advisory Agreement, and
Management Management Services
Administration Agreement. |
|
Risk factors |
|
Investment in our Securities involves certain risks relating to
our structure and investment objective that should be considered
by prospective purchasers of our Securities. In addition,
investment in our Securities involves certain risks relating to
investing in the energy sector, including but not limited to
risks associated with commodity pricing, regulation, production,
demand, depletion and expiration, weather, and valuation. We
have a limited operating history upon which you can evaluate our
business. In addition, as a business development company, our
portfolio primarily includes securities issued by privately-held
companies. These investments generally involve a high degree of
business and financial risk, and are less liquid than public
securities. We are required to mark the carrying value of our
investments to fair value on a quarterly basis, and economic
events, market conditions and events affecting individual
portfolio companies can result in
quarter-to-quarter
mark-downs and
mark-ups of
the value of individual investments that collectively can
materially affect our net asset value, or NAV. Also, our
determinations of fair value of privately-held securities may
differ materially from the values that would exist if there was
a ready market for these investments. A large number of entities
compete for the same kind of |
4
|
|
|
|
|
investment opportunities as we do. Moreover, our business
requires a substantial amount of capital to operate and to grow
and we seek additional capital from external sources. In
addition, the failure to qualify as a RIC eligible for
pass-through tax treatment under the Code on income distributed
to stockholders could have a materially adverse effect on the
total return, if any, obtainable from an investment in our
Securities. See Risk Factors and the other
information included in this prospectus for a discussion of
factors you should carefully consider before deciding to invest
in our Securities. |
|
Plan of distribution |
|
We may offer, from time to time, up to $500,000,000 of our
common stock, preferred stock, debt securities or rights to
purchase shares of our common stock, preferred stock or debt
securities on the terms to be determined at the time of the
offering. Securities may be offered at prices and on terms
described in one or more supplements to this prospectus directly
to one or more purchasers, through agents designated from time
to time by us, or to or through underwriters or dealers. The
supplement to this prospectus relating to the offering will
identify any agents or underwriters involved in the sale of our
Securities, and will set forth any applicable purchase price,
fee and commission or discount arrangement or the basis upon
which such amount may be calculated. We may not sell Securities
pursuant to this prospectus without delivering a prospectus
supplement describing the method and terms of the offering of
such Securities. For more information, see Plan of
Distribution. |
Fees and
Expenses
The following tables are intended to assist you in understanding
the costs and expenses that an investor in this offering will
bear directly or indirectly. We caution you that some of the
percentages indicated in the table below are estimates and may
vary. In these tables, we assume that we have borrowed
$195 million under our credit facility, which is the
maximum amount available under the credit facility. Except where
the context suggests otherwise, whenever this prospectus
contains a reference to fees or expenses paid by you
or us or that we will pay fees or
expenses, the Company will pay such fees and expenses out of our
net assets and, consequently, you will indirectly bear such fees
or expenses as an investor in the Company. However, you will not
be required to deliver any money or otherwise bear personal
liability or responsibility for such fees or expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder transaction expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Sales load (as a percentage of offering price)(1)
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
Offering expenses borne by us (as a percentage of offering
price)(2)
|
|
|
0.50
|
%
|
Dividend reinvestment plan expenses(3)
|
|
|
None
|
|
Total stockholder transaction expenses (as a percentage of
offering price)(4)
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
Annual expenses (as a percentage of net assets attributable
to common stock)(4):
|
|
|
|
|
Management Fees(5)
|
|
|
2.74
|
%
|
Incentive fees payable under Investment Advisory Agreement (20%
of realized capital gains and 20% of pre-incentive fee net
investment income)(6)
|
|
|
2.29
|
%
|
Interest payments on borrowed funds
|
|
|
1.84
|
%
|
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
0.02
|
%(7)
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
1.99
|
%(8)
|
Total annual expenses
|
|
|
8.89
|
%(6)(8)
|
5
Example
The following table demonstrates the projected dollar amount of
cumulative expenses we would pay out of net assets and that you
would indirectly bear over various periods with respect to a
hypothetical investment in our common stock. In calculating the
following expense amounts, we have assumed we would have
borrowed all $195 million available under our line of
credit, that our annual operating expenses would remain at the
levels set forth in the table above and that we would pay the
costs shown in the table above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
3 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
10 Years
|
|
|
You would pay the following expenses on a $1,000 investment,
assuming a 5% annual return
|
|
$
|
117.33
|
|
|
$
|
239.02
|
|
|
$
|
356.86
|
|
|
$
|
635.38
|
|
While the example assumes, as required by the SEC, a 5% annual
return, our performance will vary and may result in a return
greater or less than 5%. The income incentive fee under our
Investment Advisory Agreement with Prospect Capital Management
would be zero at the 5% annual return assumption, as required by
the SEC for this table, since no incentive fee is paid until the
annual return exceeds 7%. This illustration assumes that we will
not realize any capital gains computed net of all realized
capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation in any of the
indicated time periods. If we achieve sufficient returns on our
investments, including through the realization of capital gains,
to trigger an incentive fee of a material amount, our expenses,
and returns to our investors after such expenses, would be
higher. In addition, while the example assumes reinvestment of
all dividends and distributions at NAV, participants in our
dividend reinvestment plan will receive a number of shares of
our common stock, determined by dividing the total dollar amount
of the dividend payable to a participant by the market price per
share of our common stock at the close of trading on the
valuation date for the dividend. See Dividend Reinvestment
Plan for additional information regarding our dividend
reinvestment plan.
This example and the expenses in the table above should not
be considered a representation of our future expenses. Actual
expenses (including the cost of debt, if any, and other
expenses) may be greater or less than those shown.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the event that the Securities to which this prospectus
relates are sold to or through underwriters, a corresponding
prospectus supplement will disclose the estimated applicable
sales load. |
|
(2) |
|
The related prospectus supplement will disclose the estimated
amount of offering expenses, the offering price and the
estimated offering expenses borne by us as a percentage of the
offering price. |
|
(3) |
|
The expenses of the dividend reinvestment plan are included in
other expenses. |
|
(4) |
|
The related prospectus supplement will disclose the offering
price and the total stockholder transaction expenses as a
percentage of the offering price. |
|
(5) |
|
Our base management fee is 2% of our gross assets (which include
any amount borrowed, i.e., total assets without deduction for
any liabilities). Although no plans are in place to borrow the
full amount under our line of credit, assuming that we borrowed
$195 million, the 2% management fee of gross assets equals
approximately 2.74% of net assets. See
Management Management Services
Investment Advisory Agreement and footnote 6 below. |
|
(6) |
|
The incentive fee payable to our Investment Adviser under the
Investment Advisory Agreement is based on our performance and
will not be paid unless we achieve certain goals. Under the
assumption of a 5% return required in the example, no incentive
fee would be payable. For a more detailed discussion of the
calculation of the two-part incentive fee, see
Management Management Services
Investment Advisory Agreement. |
|
(7) |
|
The Companys stockholders indirectly bear the expenses of
underlying investment companies in which the Company invests.
This amount includes the fees and expenses of investment
companies in which the Company is invested in as of
December 31, 2009. When applicable, fees and expenses are
based on historic fees and expenses for the investment companies
and for those investment companies with little or no operating
history, fees and expenses are based on expected fees and
expenses stated in the investment companies prospectus or
other similar communication without giving effect to any
performance. Future fees and expenses for certain investment
companies may be substantially higher or lower because certain
fees and expenses are based on the performance of the investment
companies, which may fluctuate over time. The amount of the
Companys |
6
|
|
|
|
|
average net assets used in calculating this percentage was based
on average monthly net assets of approximately $637 million
for the six months ended December 31, 2009. |
|
(8) |
|
Other expenses are based on estimated amounts for
the current fiscal year. The amount shown above represents
annualized expenses during our six months ended
December 31, 2009 representing all of our estimated
recurring operating expenses (except fees and expenses reported
in other items of this table) that are deducted from our
operating income and reflected as expenses in our Statement of
Operations. The estimate of our overhead expenses, including
payments under an administration agreement with Prospect
Administration, or the Administration Agreement, based on our
projected allocable portion of overhead and other expenses
incurred by Prospect Administration in performing its
obligations under the Administration Agreement. Other
expenses does not include non-recurring expenses. See
Management Management Services
Administration Agreement. |
7
SELECTED
CONDENSED FINANCIAL DATA
You should read the condensed financial information below with
the Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in this
prospectus. Financial information below for the twelve months
ended June 30, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 has been
derived from the financial statements that were audited by our
independent registered public accounting firm. The selected
consolidated financial data at and for the six months ended
December 31 , 2009 and 2008 have been derived from unaudited
financial data, but in the opinion of our management, reflects
all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments) that are necessary to present fairly the results
for such interim periods. Interim results at and for the six
months ended December 31 , 2009 are not necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for the year ending
June 30, 2010. Certain reclassifications have been made to
the prior period financial information to conform to the current
period presentation. See Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
starting on page 27 for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended December 31
|
|
|
For the Year/Period Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except data relating to shares, per share and
number of portfolio companies)
|
|
|
Performance Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
33,374
|
|
|
$
|
34,797
|
|
|
$
|
62,926
|
|
|
$
|
59,033
|
|
|
$
|
30,084
|
|
|
$
|
13,268
|
|
|
$
|
4,586
|
|
Dividend income
|
|
|
10,388
|
|
|
|
9,388
|
|
|
|
22,793
|
|
|
|
12,033
|
|
|
|
6,153
|
|
|
|
3,601
|
|
|
|
3,435
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
6,638
|
|
|
|
13,827
|
|
|
|
14,762
|
|
|
|
8,336
|
|
|
|
4,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
|
50,400
|
|
|
|
58,012
|
|
|
|
100,481
|
|
|
|
79,402
|
|
|
|
40,681
|
|
|
|
16,869
|
|
|
|
8,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and credit facility expenses
|
|
|
(3,369
|
)
|
|
|
(3,483
|
)
|
|
|
(6,161
|
)
|
|
|
(6,318
|
)
|
|
|
(1,903
|
)
|
|
|
(642
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory expense
|
|
|
(13,696
|
)
|
|
|
(14,628
|
)
|
|
|
(26,705
|
)
|
|
|
(20,199
|
)
|
|
|
(11,226
|
)
|
|
|
(3,868
|
)
|
|
|
(1,808
|
)
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
(4,092
|
)
|
|
|
(4,439
|
)
|
|
|
(8,452
|
)
|
|
|
(7,772
|
)
|
|
|
(4,421
|
)
|
|
|
(3,801
|
)
|
|
|
(3,874
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
(21,157
|
)
|
|
|
(22,550
|
)
|
|
|
(41,318
|
)
|
|
|
(34,289
|
)
|
|
|
(17,550
|
)
|
|
|
(8,311
|
)
|
|
|
(5,682
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
29,243
|
|
|
|
35,462
|
|
|
|
59,163
|
|
|
|
45,113
|
|
|
|
23,131
|
|
|
|
8,558
|
|
|
|
2,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
|
(52,474
|
)
|
|
|
(14,940
|
)
|
|
|
(24,059
|
)
|
|
|
(17,522
|
)
|
|
|
(6,403
|
)
|
|
|
4,338
|
|
|
|
6,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets from operations
|
|
$
|
(23,231
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,522
|
|
|
$
|
35,104
|
|
|
$
|
27,591
|
|
|
$
|
16,728
|
|
|
$
|
12,896
|
|
|
$
|
8,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets from operations(1)
|
|
$
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
$
|
1.83
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
Distributions declared per share
|
|
$
|
(0.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.80
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.62
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.59
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.54
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
Average weighted shares outstanding for the period
|
|
|
53,709,197
|
|
|
|
29,569,571
|
|
|
|
31,559,905
|
|
|
|
23,626,642
|
|
|
|
15,724,095
|
|
|
|
7,056,846
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
Assets and Liabilities Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
$
|
648,135
|
|
|
$
|
555,661
|
|
|
$
|
547,168
|
|
|
$
|
497,530
|
|
|
$
|
328,222
|
|
|
$
|
133,969
|
|
|
$
|
55,030
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
40,945
|
|
|
|
32,316
|
|
|
|
119,857
|
|
|
|
44,248
|
|
|
|
48,280
|
|
|
|
4,511
|
|
|
|
48,879
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
689,080
|
|
|
|
587,977
|
|
|
|
667,025
|
|
|
|
541,778
|
|
|
|
376,502
|
|
|
|
138,480
|
|
|
|
103,909
|
|
Amount drawn on credit facility
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
138,667
|
|
|
|
124,800
|
|
|
|
91,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount owed to related parties
|
|
|
7,412
|
|
|
|
6,312
|
|
|
|
6,713
|
|
|
|
6,641
|
|
|
|
4,838
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
34,191
|
|
|
|
15,195
|
|
|
|
2,916
|
|
|
|
14,347
|
|
|
|
71,616
|
|
|
|
965
|
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
51,603
|
|
|
|
160,174
|
|
|
|
134,429
|
|
|
|
112,155
|
|
|
|
76,454
|
|
|
|
30,210
|
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets
|
|
$
|
637,477
|
|
|
$
|
427,803
|
|
|
$
|
532,596
|
|
|
$
|
429,623
|
|
|
$
|
300,048
|
|
|
$
|
108,270
|
|
|
$
|
102,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Activity Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of portfolio companies at period end
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
29
|
(2)
|
|
|
24
|
(2)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
$
|
216,504
|
|
|
$
|
84,020
|
|
|
$
|
98,305
|
|
|
$
|
311,947
|
|
|
$
|
167,255
|
|
|
$
|
83,625
|
|
|
$
|
79,018
|
|
Sales, repayments, and other disposals
|
|
$
|
69,735
|
|
|
$
|
13,077
|
|
|
$
|
27,007
|
|
|
$
|
127,212
|
|
|
$
|
38,407
|
|
|
$
|
9,954
|
|
|
$
|
32,083
|
|
Weighted-Average Yield at end of period(3)
|
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
21.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Per share data is based on average weighted shares for the
period. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes a net profits interest in Charlevoix Energy Trading LLC
(Charlevoix), remaining after loan was paid. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes dividends from certain equity investments. |
8
RISK
FACTORS
Investing in our Securities involves a high degree of risk.
You should carefully consider the risks described below,
together with all of the other information included in this
prospectus, before you decide whether to make an investment in
our Securities. The risks set forth below are not the only risks
we face. If any of the adverse events or conditions described
below occur, our business, financial condition and results of
operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case,
our NAV, and the trading price of our common stock could
decline, or the value of our preferred stock, debt securities,
and warrants, if any are outstanding, may decline, and you may
lose all or part of your investment.
Risks
Relating To Our Business
Our
financial condition and results of operations will depend on our
ability to manage our future growth effectively.
Prospect Capital Management has been registered as an investment
adviser since March 31, 2004, and we have been organized as
a closed-end investment company since April 13, 2004. Our
ability to achieve our investment objective depends on our
ability to grow, which depends, in turn, on our Investment
Advisers ability to continue to identify, analyze, invest
in and monitor companies that meet our investment criteria.
Accomplishing this result on a cost-effective basis is largely a
function of our Investment Advisers structuring of
investments, its ability to provide competent, attentive and
efficient services to us and our access to financing on
acceptable terms. As we continue to grow, Prospect Capital
Management will need to continue to hire, train, supervise and
manage new employees. Failure to manage our future growth
effectively could have a materially adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are
dependent upon Prospect Capital Managements key management
personnel for our future success.
We depend on the diligence, skill and network of business
contacts of the senior management of our Investment Adviser. We
also depend, to a significant extent, on our Investment
Advisers access to the investment professionals and the
information and deal flow generated by these investment
professionals in the course of their investment and portfolio
management activities. The senior management team of the
Investment Adviser evaluates, negotiates, structures, closes,
monitors and services our investments. Our success depends to a
significant extent on the continued service of the senior
management team, particularly John F. Barry III and M.
Grier Eliasek. The departure of any of the senior management
team could have a materially adverse effect on our ability to
achieve our investment objective. In addition, we can offer no
assurance that Prospect Capital Management will remain our
investment adviser or that we will continue to have access to
its investment professionals or its information and deal flow.
We
operate in a highly competitive market for investment
opportunities.
A large number of entities compete with us to make the types of
investments that we make in target companies. We compete with
other business development companies, public and private funds,
commercial and investment banks and commercial financing
companies. Additionally, because competition for investment
opportunities generally has increased among alternative
investment vehicles, such as hedge funds, those entities have
begun to invest in areas they have not traditionally invested
in, including investments in middle-market companies. As a
result of these new entrants, competition for investment
opportunities at middle-market companies has intensified, a
trend we expect to continue.
Many of our existing and potential competitors are substantially
larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and
marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors
may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources
that are not available to us. In addition, some of our
competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk
assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety
of investments and establish more or fuller relationships with
borrowers and sponsors than us. Furthermore, many of our
competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that
the 1940 Act imposes on us as a business development company. We
cannot assure you that the competitive pressures we face will
not have a materially adverse effect on our
9
business, financial condition and results of operations. Also,
as a result of existing and increasing competition and our
competitors ability to provide a total package solution, we may
not be able to take advantage of attractive investment
opportunities from time to time, and we can offer no assurance
that we will be able to identify and make investments that are
consistent with our investment objective.
We do not seek to compete primarily based on the interest rates
that we offer, and we believe that some of our competitors make
loans with interest rates that are comparable to or lower than
the rates we offer. We may lose investment opportunities if we
do not match our competitors pricing, terms and structure.
If we match our competitors pricing, terms and structure,
we may experience decreased net interest income and increased
risk of credit loss.
Most
of our portfolio investments are recorded at fair value as
determined in good faith by our Board of Directors and, as a
result, there is uncertainty as to the value of our portfolio
investments.
A large percentage of our portfolio investments consist of
securities of privately held companies. Hence, market quotations
are generally not readily available for determining the fair
values of such investments. The determination of fair value, and
thus the amount of unrealized losses we may incur in any year,
is to a degree subjective, and the Investment Adviser has a
conflict of interest in making the determination. We value these
securities quarterly at fair value as determined in good faith
by our Board of Directors based on input from our Investment
Adviser, a third party independent valuation firm and our audit
committee. Our Board of Directors utilizes the services of an
independent valuation firm to aid it in determining the fair
value of any securities. The types of factors that may be
considered in determining the fair values of our investments
include the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the
portfolio companys ability to make payments and its
earnings, the markets in which the portfolio company does
business, comparison to publicly traded companies, discounted
cash flow, current market interest rates and other relevant
factors. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of
private securities and private companies, are inherently
uncertain, the valuations may fluctuate significantly over short
periods of time due to changes in current market conditions. The
determinations of fair value by our Board of Directors may
differ materially from the values that would have been used if
an active market and market quotations existed for these
investments. Our net asset value could be adversely affected if
the determinations regarding the fair value of our investments
were materially higher than the values that we ultimately
realize upon the disposal of such securities.
Senior
securities, including debt, expose us to additional risks,
including the typical risks associated with
leverage.
We currently use our revolving credit facility to leverage our
portfolio and we expect in the future to borrow from and issue
senior debt securities to banks and other lenders and may
securitize certain of our portfolio investments.
With certain limited exceptions, as a BDC we are only allowed to
borrow amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the
1940 Act, is at least 200% after such borrowing. The amount of
leverage that we employ will depend on our Investment
Advisers and our Board of Directors assessment of
market conditions and other factors at the time of any proposed
borrowing. There is no assurance that a leveraging strategy will
be successful. Leverage involves risks and special
considerations for stockholders, including:
|
|
|
|
|
A likelihood of greater volatility in the net asset value and
market price of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
Diminished operating flexibility as a result of asset coverage
or investment portfolio composition requirements required by
lenders or investors that are more stringent than those imposed
by the 1940 Act;
|
|
|
|
The possibility that investments will have to be liquidated at
less than full value or at inopportune times to comply with debt
covenants or to pay interest or dividends on the leverage;
|
|
|
|
Increased operating expenses due to the cost of leverage,
including issuance and servicing costs;
|
|
|
|
Convertible or exchangeable securities issued in the future may
have rights, preferences and privileges more favorable than
those of our common stock; and
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
Subordination to lenders superior claims on our assets as
a result of which lenders will be able to receive proceeds
available in the case of our liquidation before any proceeds are
distributed to our stockholders.
|
For example, the amount we may borrow under our revolving credit
facility is determined, in part, by the fair value of our
investments. If the fair value of our investments declines, we
may be forced to sell investments at a loss to maintain
compliance with our borrowing limits. Other debt facilities we
may enter into in the future may contain similar provisions. Any
such forced sales would reduce our net asset value and also make
it difficult for the net asset value to recover. Our Investment
Adviser and our Board of Directors in their best judgment
nevertheless may determine to use leverage if they expect that
the benefits to our stockholders of maintaining the leveraged
position will outweigh the risks.
Illustration. The following table illustrates
the effect of leverage on returns from an investment in our
common stock assuming various annual returns, net of expenses.
The calculations in the table below are hypothetical and actual
returns may be higher or lower than those appearing below. The
calculation assumes (i) $667 million in total assets,
(ii) an average cost of funds of 7.0%,
(iii) $124.8 million in debt outstanding and
(iv) $532.6 million of shareholders equity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed Return on Our Portfolio (net of expenses)
|
|
(10)%
|
|
(5)%
|
|
0%
|
|
5%
|
|
10%
|
Corresponding Return to Stockholder
|
|
|
(14.2)%
|
|
|
|
(7.9)%
|
|
|
|
(1.6)%
|
|
|
|
4.6%
|
|
|
|
10.9%
|
|
|
Changes
in interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net
investment income.
A significant portion of the debt investments we make bears
interest at fixed rates and the value of these investments could
be negatively affected by increases in market interest rates. In
addition, as the interest rate on our revolving credit facility
is at a variable rate based on an index, an increase in interest
rates would make it more expensive to use debt to finance our
investments. As a result, a significant increase in market
interest rates could both reduce the value of our portfolio
investments and increase our cost of capital, which would reduce
our net investment income.
We
need to raise additional capital to grow because we must
distribute most of our income.
We need additional capital to fund growth in our investments. A
reduction in the availability of new capital could limit our
ability to grow. We must distribute at least 90% of our ordinary
income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of
realized net long-term capital losses, if any, to our
shareholders to maintain our RIC status. As a result, such
earnings are not available to fund investment originations. We
have sought additional capital by borrowing from financial
institutions and may issue debt securities or additional equity
securities. If we fail to obtain funds from such sources or from
other sources to fund our investments, we could be limited in
our ability to grow, which may have an adverse effect on the
value of our common stock. In addition, as a business
development company, we are generally required to maintain a
ratio of total assets to total borrowings of at least 200%,
which may restrict our ability to borrow in certain
circumstances.
The
lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our
business.
We generally make investments in private companies.
Substantially all of these securities are subject to legal and
other restrictions on resale or are otherwise less liquid than
publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our investments
may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the
need arises. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or
a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly
less than the value at which we have previously recorded our
investments. In addition, we may face other restrictions on our
ability to liquidate an investment in a portfolio company to the
extent that we or our Investment Adviser has material non-public
information regarding such portfolio company.
We may
experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.
We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating
results due to a number of factors, including the interest or
dividend rates payable on the debt or equity securities we hold,
the default rate on debt securities, the level of our expenses,
variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized and
unrealized gains or losses, the
11
degree to which we encounter competition in our markets, the
seasonality of the energy industry, weather patterns, changes in
energy prices and general economic conditions. As a result of
these factors, results for any period should not be relied upon
as being indicative of performance in future periods.
Our
most recent net asset value was calculated on December 31,
2009 and our NAV when calculated effective March 31,
2010 may be higher or lower.
Our most recently estimated NAV per share is $10.07 on an as
adjusted basis solely to give effect to our issuance of common
shares on January 25, 2010 in connection with our dividend
reinvestment plan, versus $10.06 determined by us as of
December 31, 2009. NAV as of March 31, 2010 may
be higher or lower than $10.07 based on potential changes in
valuations and earnings for the quarter then ended. Our Board of
Directors has not yet determined the fair value of portfolio
investments subsequent to December 31, 2009. Our Board of
Directors determines the fair value of our portfolio investments
on a quarterly basis in connection with the preparation of
quarterly financial statements and based on input from an
independent valuation firm, our Investment Advisor and the audit
committee of our Board of Directors.
Potential
conflicts of interest could impact our investment
returns.
Our executive officers and directors, and the executive officers
of our Investment Adviser, Prospect Capital Management, may
serve as officers, directors or principals of entities that
operate in the same or related lines of business as we do or of
investment funds managed by our affiliates. Accordingly, they
may have obligations to investors in those entities, the
fulfillment of which might not be in our best interests or those
of our stockholders. Nevertheless, it is possible that new
investment opportunities that meet our investment objective may
come to the attention of one of these entities in connection
with another investment advisory client or program, and, if so,
such opportunity might not be offered, or otherwise made
available, to us. However, as an investment adviser, Prospect
Capital Management has a fiduciary obligation to act in the best
interests of its clients, including us. To that end, if Prospect
Capital Management or its affiliates manage any additional
investment vehicles or client accounts in the future, Prospect
Capital Management will endeavor to allocate investment
opportunities in a fair and equitable manner over time so as not
to discriminate unfairly against any client. If Prospect Capital
Management chooses to establish another investment fund in the
future, when the investment professionals of Prospect Capital
Management identify an investment, they will have to choose
which investment fund should make the investment.
In the course of our investing activities, under the Investment
Advisory Agreement we pay base management and incentive fees to
Prospect Capital Management, and reimburse Prospect Capital
Management for certain expenses it incurs. As a result of the
Investment Advisory Agreement, there may be times when the
senior management team of Prospect Capital Management has
interests that differ from those of our stockholders, giving
rise to a conflict.
Prospect Capital Management receives a quarterly income
incentive fee based, in part, on our pre-incentive fee net
investment income, if any, for the immediately preceding
calendar quarter. This income incentive fee is subject to a
fixed quarterly hurdle rate before providing an income incentive
fee return to the Investment Adviser. This fixed hurdle rate was
determined when then current interest rates were relatively low
on a historical basis. Thus, if interest rates rise, it would
become easier for our investment income to exceed the hurdle
rate and, as a result, more likely that our Investment Adviser
will receive an income incentive fee than if interest rates on
our investments remained constant or decreased. Subject to the
receipt of any requisite stockholder approval under the 1940
Act, our Board of Directors may adjust the hurdle rate by
amending the Investment Advisory Agreement.
The income incentive fee payable by us is computed and paid on
income that may include interest that has been accrued but not
yet received in cash. If a portfolio company defaults on a loan
that has a deferred interest feature, it is possible that
interest accrued under such loan that has previously been
included in the calculation of the income incentive fee will
become uncollectible. If this happens, our Investment Adviser is
not required to reimburse us for any such income incentive fee
payments. If we do not have sufficient liquid assets to pay this
incentive fee or distributions to stockholders on such accrued
income, we may be required to liquidate assets in order to do
so. This fee structure could give rise to a conflict of interest
for our Investment Adviser to the extent that it may encourage
12
the Investment Adviser to favor debt financings that provide for
deferred interest, rather than current cash payments of interest.
We have entered into a royalty-free license agreement with
Prospect Capital Management. Under this agreement, Prospect
Capital Management agrees to grant us a non-exclusive license to
use the name Prospect Capital. Under the license
agreement, we have the right to use the Prospect
Capital name for so long as Prospect Capital Management or
one of its affiliates remains our Investment Adviser. In
addition, we rent office space from Prospect Administration, an
affiliate of Prospect Capital Management, and pay Prospect
Administration our allocable portion of overhead and other
expenses incurred by Prospect Administration in performing its
obligations as Administrator under the Administration Agreement,
including rent and our allocable portion of the costs of our
chief financial officer and chief compliance officer and their
respective staffs. This may create conflicts of interest that
our Board of Directors monitors.
Our
incentive fee could induce Prospect Capital Management to make
speculative investments.
The incentive fee payable by us to Prospect Capital Management
may create an incentive for our Investment Adviser to make
investments on our behalf that are more speculative or involve
more risk than would be the case in the absence of such
compensation arrangement. The way in which the incentive fee
payable is determined (calculated as a percentage of the return
on invested capital) may encourage the Investment Adviser to use
leverage to increase the return on our investments. Increased
use of leverage and this increased risk of replacement of that
leverage at maturity, would increase the likelihood of default,
which would disfavor holders of our common stock. Similarly,
because the Investment Adviser will receive an incentive fee
based, in part, upon net capital gains realized on our
investments, the Investment Adviser may invest more than would
otherwise be appropriate in companies whose securities are
likely to yield capital gains, as compared to income producing
securities. Such a practice could result in our investing in
more speculative securities than would otherwise be the case,
which could result in higher investment losses, particularly
during economic downturns.
The incentive fee payable by us to Prospect Capital Management
could create an incentive for our Investment Adviser to invest
on our behalf in instruments, such as zero coupon bonds, that
have a deferred interest feature. Under these investments, we
would accrue interest income over the life of the investment but
would not receive payments in cash on the investment until the
end of the term. Our net investment income used to calculate the
income incentive fee, however, includes accrued interest. For
example, accrued interest, if any, on our investments in zero
coupon bonds will be included in the calculation of our
incentive fee, even though we will not receive any cash interest
payments in respect of payment on the bond until its maturity
date. Thus, a portion of this incentive fee would be based on
income that we may not have yet received in cash in the event of
default may never receive.
Changes
in laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely
affect our business.
We and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation by laws
at the local, state and U.S. Federal levels. These laws and
regulations, as well as their interpretation, may be changed
from time to time. Accordingly, changes in these laws or
regulations could have a materially adverse effect on our
business. For additional information regarding the regulations
we are subject to, see Regulation.
Recent
developments may increase the risks associated with our business
and an investment in us.
The U.S. financial markets have been experiencing a high
level of volatility, disruption and distress, which was
exacerbated by the failure of several major financial
institutions in the last few months of 2008. In addition, the
U.S. economy has been in a recession , the aftermath of
which may be severe and prolonged. Similar conditions have
occurred in the financial markets and economies of numerous
other countries and could worsen, both in the U.S. and
globally. These conditions have raised the level of many of the
risks described in this document and could have an adverse
effect on our portfolio companies as well as on our business,
financial condition, results of operations, dividend payments,
credit facility, access to capital, valuation of our assets, NAV
and our stock price.
13
Risks
Relating To Our Operation As A Business Development
Company
Our
Investment Adviser and its senior management team have limited
experience managing a business development company under the
1940 Act.
The 1940 Act imposes numerous constraints on the operations of
business development companies. For example, business
development companies are, with narrow exceptions, required to
invest at least 70% of their total assets in securities of
certain privately held, thinly traded or distressed
U.S. companies, cash, cash equivalents,
U.S. government securities and other high quality debt
investments that mature in one year or less. Our Investment
Advisers and its senior management teams limited
experience in managing a portfolio of assets under such
constraints may hinder their ability to take advantage of
attractive investment opportunities and, as a result, achieve
our investment objective. In addition, our investment strategies
differ in some ways from those of other investment funds that
have been managed in the past by investment professionals.
A
failure on our part to maintain our status as a business
development company would significantly reduce our operating
flexibility.
If we do not continue to qualify as a business development
company, we might be regulated as a registered closed-end
investment company under the 1940 Act; our failure to qualify as
a BDC would make us subject to additional regulatory
requirements, which may significantly decrease our operating
flexibility by limiting our ability to employ leverage.
If we
fail to qualify as a RIC, we will have to pay corporate-level
taxes on our income, and our income available for distribution
would be reduced.
To maintain our qualification for federal income tax purposes as
a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code, and obtain RIC tax
treatment, we must meet certain source of income, asset
diversification and annual distribution requirements.
The source of income requirement is satisfied if we derive at
least 90% of our annual gross income from interest, dividends,
payments with respect to certain securities loans, gains from
the sale or other disposition of securities or options thereon
or foreign currencies, or other income derived with respect to
our business of investing in such securities or currencies, and
net income from interests in qualified publicly traded
partnerships, as defined in the Code.
The annual distribution requirement for a RIC is satisfied if we
distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net
short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term
capital losses, if any, to our stockholders on an annual basis.
Because we use debt financing, we are subject to certain asset
coverage ratio requirements under the 1940 Act and financial
covenants that could, under certain circumstances, restrict us
from making distributions necessary to qualify for RIC tax
treatment. If we are unable to obtain cash from other sources,
we may fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and, thus, may be
subject to corporate-level income tax.
To maintain our qualification as a RIC, we must also meet
certain asset diversification requirements at the end of each
calendar quarter. Failure to meet these tests may result in our
having to dispose of certain investments quickly in order to
prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most of our investments
are in private companies, any such dispositions could be made at
disadvantageous prices and may result in substantial losses.
If we fail to qualify as a RIC for any reason or become subject
to corporate income tax, the resulting corporate taxes could
substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income
available for distribution, and the actual amount of our
distributions. Such a failure would have a materially adverse
effect on us and our stockholders. For additional information
regarding asset coverage ratio and RIC requirements, see
Regulation Senior Securities and
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.
14
Regulations
governing our operation as a business development company affect
our ability to raise, and the way in which we raise, additional
capital.
We have incurred indebtedness under our revolving credit
facility and, in the future, may issue preferred stock
and/or
borrow additional money from banks or other financial
institutions, which we refer to collectively as senior
securities, up to the maximum amount permitted by the 1940
Act. Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as
a BDC, to incur indebtedness or issue senior securities only in
amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940
Act, equals at least 200% after each issuance of senior
securities. If the value of our assets declines, we may be
unable to satisfy this test, which would prohibit us from paying
dividends and could prohibit us from qualifying as a RIC. If we
cannot satisfy this test, we may be required to sell a portion
of our investments or sell additional shares of common stock at
a time when such sales may be disadvantageous in order to repay
a portion of our indebtedness. In addition, issuance of
additional common stock could dilute the percentage ownership of
our current stockholders in us.
As a BDC regulated under provisions of the 1940 Act, we are not
generally able to issue and sell our common stock at a price
below the current net asset value per share. If our common stock
trades at a discount to net asset value, this restriction could
adversely affect our ability to raise capital. We may, however,
sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire
our common stock, at a price below the current net asset value
of our common stock in certain circumstances, including if
(i)(1) the holders of a majority of our shares (or, if less, at
least 67% of a quorum consisting of a majority of our shares)
and a similar majority of the holders of our shares who are not
affiliated persons of us approve the sale of our common stock at
a price that is less than the current net asset value, and
(2) a majority of our Directors who have no financial
interest in the transaction and a majority of our independent
Directors (a) determine that such sale is in our and our
stockholders best interests and (b) in consultation
with any underwriter or underwriters of the offering, make a
good faith determination as of a time either immediately prior
to the first solicitation by us or on our behalf of firm
commitments to purchase such shares, or immediately prior to the
issuance of such shares, that the price at which such shares are
to be sold is not less than a price which closely approximates
the market value of such shares, less any distributing
commission or discount or if (ii) a majority of the number
of the beneficial holders of our common stock entitled to vote
at our annual meeting, without regard to whether a majority of
such shares are voted in favor of the proposal, approve the sale
of our common stock at a price that is less than the current net
asset value per share. At our 2008 annual meeting of
stockholders held on February 12, 2009, and our 2009 annual
meeting of stockholders held on December 11, 2009, we
obtained the first method of approval from our shareholders. See
If we sell common stock at a discount to our net asset
value per share, stockholders who do not participate in such
sale will experience immediate dilution in an amount that may be
material discussed below.
To generate cash for funding new investments, we pledged a
substantial portion of our portfolio investments under our
revolving credit facility. These assets are not available to
secure other sources of funding or for securitization. Our
ability to obtain additional secured or unsecured financing on
attractive terms in the future is uncertain.
Alternatively, we may securitize our future loans to generate
cash for funding new investments. To securitize loans, we may
create a wholly owned subsidiary and contribute a pool of loans
to such subsidiary. This could include the sale of interests in
the loans by the subsidiary on a non-recourse basis to
purchasers who we would expect to be willing to accept a lower
interest rate to invest in investment grade loan pools. We would
retain a portion of the equity in the securitized pool of loans.
An inability to successfully securitize our loan portfolio could
limit our ability to grow our business and fully execute our
business strategy, and could decrease our earnings, if any.
Moreover, the successful securitization of our loan portfolio
exposes us to a risk of loss for the equity we retain in the
securitized pool of loans and might expose us to losses because
the residual loans in which we do not sell interests may tend to
be those that are riskier and more likely to generate losses. A
successful securitization may also impose financial and
operating covenants that restrict our business activities and
may include limitations that could hinder our ability to finance
additional loans and investments or to make the distributions
required to maintain our status as a RIC under Subchapter M of
the Code. The 1940 Act may also impose restrictions on the
structure of any securitizations.
15
Our
common stock may trade at a discount to our net asset value per
share.
Common stock of BDCs, like that of closed-end investment
companies, frequently trades at a discount to current net asset
value, which could adversely affect the ability to raise
capital. In the past, our common stock has traded at a discount
to our net asset value. However, we have been able to
periodically raise capital pursuant to authority granted by our
stockholders at our 2008 and 2009 annual meetings to sell an
unlimited number of shares of our common stock at any level of
discount from net asset value during the 12 month period
following such approval. The risk that our common stock may
continue to trade at a discount to our net asset value is
separate and distinct from the risk that our net asset value per
share may decline.
If we
sell common stock at a discount to our net asset value per
share, stockholders who do not participate in such sale will
experience immediate dilution in an amount that may be
material.
At our 2009 annual meeting of stockholders held on
December 11, 2009, our stockholders approved our ability to
sell an unlimited number of shares of our common stock at any
level of discount from net asset value per share during the
12 month period following the December 11, 2009
approval in accordance with the exception described above in
Regulations governing our operation as a
business development company affect our ability to raise, and
the way in which we raise, additional capital. The
issuance or sale by us of shares of our common stock at a
discount to net asset value poses a risk of dilution to our
stockholders. In particular, stockholders who do not purchase
additional shares at or below the discounted price in proportion
to their current ownership will experience an immediate decrease
in net asset value per share (as well as in the aggregate net
asset value of their shares if they do not participate at all).
These stockholders will also experience a disproportionately
greater decrease in their participation in our earnings and
assets and their voting power than the increase we experience in
our assets, potential earning power and voting interests from
such issuance or sale. They may also experience a reduction in
the market price of our common stock. For additional information
and hypothetical examples of these risks, see Sales of
Common Stock Below Net Asset Value and the prospectus
supplement pursuant to which such sale is made.
We may
have difficulty paying our required distributions if we
recognize income before or without receiving cash representing
such income.
For U.S. Federal income tax purposes, we include in income
certain amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as
original issue discount, which may arise if we receive warrants
in connection with the making of a loan or possibly in other
circumstances, or
payment-in-kind
interest, which represents contractual interest added to the
loan balance and due at the end of the loan term. Such original
issue discount, which could be significant relative to our
overall investment activities, or increases in loan balances as
a result of
payment-in-kind
arrangements, are included in our taxable income before we
receive any corresponding cash payments. We also may be required
to include in taxable income certain other amounts that we do
not receive in cash. While we focus primarily on investments
that will generate a current cash return, our investment
portfolio currently includes, and we may continue to invest in,
securities that do not pay some or all of their return in
periodic current cash distributions.
The income incentive fee payable by us is computed and paid on
income that may include interest that has been accrued but not
yet received in cash. If a portfolio company defaults on a loan
that is structured to provide accrued interest, it is possible
that accrued interest previously used in the calculation of the
income incentive fee will become uncollectible.
Since in some cases we may recognize taxable income before or
without receiving cash representing such income, we may have
difficulty meeting the tax requirement to distribute at least
90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital
gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if
any, to maintain RIC tax treatment. Accordingly, we may have to
sell some of our investments at times we would not consider
advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or reduce
new investment originations to meet these distribution
requirements. If we are not able to obtain cash from other
sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC treatment and thus
become subject to corporate-level income tax. See
Regulation Senior Securities and
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.
16
Our
ability to enter into transactions with our affiliates is
restricted.
We are prohibited under the 1940 Act from knowingly
participating in certain transactions with our affiliates
without the prior approval of our independent directors. Any
person that owns, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of our
outstanding voting securities is our affiliate for purposes of
the 1940 Act and we are generally prohibited from buying or
selling any security or other property from or to such
affiliate, absent the prior approval of our independent
directors. The 1940 Act also prohibits joint
transactions with an affiliate, which could include investments
in the same portfolio company (whether at the same or different
times), without prior approval of our independent directors. We
are prohibited from buying or selling any security or other
property from or to our Investment Adviser and its affiliates
and persons with whom we are in a control relationship, or
entering into joint transactions with any such person, absent
the prior approval of the SEC.
The
Company may be unable to realize the benefits anticipated by the
merger with Patriot or may take longer than anticipated to
achieve such benefits.
On December 2, 2009, we completed our previously announced
acquisition of Patriot under the Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of August 3, 2009, by and among, us and Patriot.
The realization of certain benefits anticipated as a result of
the merger will depend in part on the integration of
Patriots investment portfolio with the Company and the
successful inclusion of Patriots investment portfolio in
the Companys financing operations. There can be no
assurance that Patriots business can be operated
profitably or integrated successfully into the Companys
operations in a timely fashion or at all. The dedication of
management resources to such integration may detract attention
from the
day-to-day
business of the Company and there can be no assurance that there
will not be substantial costs associated with the transition
process or that there will not be other material adverse effects
as a result of these integration efforts. Such effects,
including but not limited to, incurring unexpected costs or
delays in connection with such integration and failure of
Patriots investment portfolio to perform as expected,
could have a material adverse effect on the financial results of
the Company.
Risks
Relating To Our Investments
We may not realize gains or income from our investments.
We seek to generate both current income and capital
appreciation. However, the securities we invest in may not
appreciate and, in fact, may decline in value, and the issuers
of debt securities we invest in may default on interest
and/or
principal payments. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize
gains from our investments, and any gains that we do realize may
not be sufficient to offset any losses we experience. See
Business Our Investment Objective and
Policies.
Our portfolio is concentrated in a limited number of portfolio
companies, particularly those in the energy industry, which
subject us to a risk of significant loss if any of these
companies defaults on its obligations under any of the
securities that we hold or if the energy industry experiences a
downturn.
As of February 25, 2010, we had invested in a number of
companies in the energy and energy related industries. A
consequence of this lack of diversification is that the
aggregate returns we realize may be significantly and adversely
affected if a small number of such investments perform poorly or
if we need to write down the value of any one investment. Beyond
our income tax diversification requirements, we do not have
fixed guidelines for diversification, and our investments are
concentrated in relatively few portfolio companies. In addition,
to date we have concentrated on making investments in the energy
industry. While we expect to be less focused on the energy and
energy related industries in the future, we anticipate that we
will continue to have significant holdings in the energy and
energy related industries. As a result, a downturn in the energy
industry could materially and adversely affect us.
The
energy industry is subject to many risks.
We have a significant concentration in the energy industry. Our
definition of energy, as used in the context of the energy
industry, is broad, and different sectors in the energy industry
may be subject to variable risks and economic pressures. As a
result, it is difficult to anticipate the impact of changing
economic and political conditions
17
on our portfolio companies and, as a result, our financial
results. The revenues, income (or losses) and valuations of
energy companies can fluctuate suddenly and dramatically due to
any one or more of the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity Pricing Risk. Energy companies in
general are directly affected by energy commodity prices, such
as the market prices of crude oil, natural gas and wholesale
electricity, especially for those that own the underlying energy
commodity. In addition, the volatility of commodity prices can
affect other energy companies due to the impact of prices on the
volume of commodities transported, processed, stored or
distributed and on the cost of fuel for power generation
companies. The volatility of commodity prices can also affect
energy companies ability to access the capital markets in
light of market perception that their performance may be
directly tied to commodity prices. Historically, energy
commodity prices have been cyclical and exhibited significant
volatility. Although we generally prefer risk controls,
including appropriate commodity and other hedges, by certain of
our portfolio companies, if available, some of our portfolio
companies may not engage in hedging transactions to minimize
their exposure to commodity price risk. For those companies that
engage in such hedging transactions, they remain subject to
market risks, including market liquidity and counterparty
creditworthiness. In addition, such companies may also still
have exposure to market prices if such companies do not produce
volumes or other contractual obligations in accordance with such
hedging contracts.
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Risk. The profitability of energy
companies could be adversely affected by changes in the
regulatory environment. The businesses of energy companies are
heavily regulated by federal, state and local governments in
diverse ways, such as the way in which energy assets are
constructed, maintained and operated and the prices energy
companies may charge for their products and services. Such
regulation can change over time in scope and intensity. For
example, a particular by-product of an energy process may be
declared hazardous by a regulatory agency, which can
unexpectedly increase production costs. Moreover, many state and
federal environmental laws provide for civil penalties as well
as regulatory remediation, thus adding to the potential
liability an energy company may face. In addition, the
deregulation of energy markets and the unresolved regulatory
issues related to some power markets such as California create
uncertainty in the regulatory environment as rules and
regulations may be adopted on a transitional basis. We cannot
assure you that the deregulation of energy markets will continue
and if it continues, whether its impact on energy
companies profitability will be positive.
|
|
|
|
Production Risk. The profitability of energy
companies may be materially impacted by the volume of crude oil,
natural gas or other energy commodities available for
transporting, processing, storing, distributing or power
generation. A significant decrease in the production of natural
gas, crude oil, coal or other energy commodities, due to the
decline of production from existing facilities, import supply
disruption, depressed commodity prices, political events, OPEC
actions or otherwise, could reduce revenue and operating income
or increase operating costs of energy companies and, therefore,
their ability to pay debt or dividends.
|
|
|
|
Demand Risk. A sustained decline in demand for
crude oil, natural gas, refined petroleum products and
electricity could materially affect revenues and cash flows of
energy companies. Factors that could lead to a decrease in
market demand include a recession or other adverse economic
conditions, an increase in the market price of the underlying
commodity, higher taxes or other regulatory actions that
increase costs, or a shift in consumer demand for such products.
|
|
|
|
Depletion and Exploration Risk. A portion of
any one energy companys assets may be dedicated to natural
gas, crude oil
and/or coal
reserves and other commodities that naturally deplete over time.
Depletion could have a materially adverse impact on such
companys ability to maintain its revenue. Further,
estimates of energy reserves may not be accurate and, even if
accurate, reserves may not be fully utilized at reasonable
costs. Exploration of energy resources, especially of oil and
gas, is inherently risky and requires large amounts of capital.
|
|
|
|
Weather Risk. Unseasonable extreme weather
patterns could result in significant volatility in demand for
energy and power. In addition, hurricanes, storms, tornados,
floods, rain, and other significant weather events could disrupt
supply and other operations at our portfolio companies as well
as customers or suppliers to such companies. This volatility may
create fluctuations in earnings of energy companies.
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
Operational Risk. Energy companies are subject
to various operational risks, such as failed drilling or well
development, unscheduled outages, underestimated cost
projections, unanticipated operation and maintenance expenses,
failure to obtain the necessary permits to operate and failure
of third-party contractors (for example, energy producers and
shippers) to perform their contractual obligations. In addition,
energy companies employ a variety of means of increasing cash
flow, including increasing utilization of existing facilities,
expanding operations through new construction, expanding
operations through acquisitions, or securing additional
long-term contracts. Thus, some energy companies may be subject
to construction risk, acquisition risk or other risk factors
arising from their specific business strategies.
|
|
|
|
Competition Risk. The progress in deregulating
energy markets has created more competition in the energy
industry. This competition is reflected in risks associated with
marketing and selling energy in the evolving energy market and a
competitors development of a lower-cost energy or power
source, or of a lower cost means of operations, and other risks
arising from competition.
|
|
|
|
Valuation Risk. Since mid-2001, excess power
generation capacity in certain regions of the United States has
caused substantial decreases in the market capitalization of
many energy companies. While such prices have recovered to some
extent, we can offer no assurance that such decreases in market
capitalization will not recur, or that any future decreases in
energy company valuations will be insubstantial or temporary in
nature.
|
|
|
|
Terrorism Risk. Since the
September 11th attacks, the United States government
has issued public warnings indicating that energy assets,
specifically those related to pipeline infrastructure,
production facilities and transmission and distribution
facilities, might be specific targets of terrorist activity. The
continued threat of terrorism and related military activity will
likely increase volatility for prices of natural gas and oil and
could affect the market for products and services of energy
companies. In addition, any future terrorist attack or armed
conflict in the United States or elsewhere may undermine
economic conditions in the United States in general.
|
|
|
|
Financing Risk. Some of our portfolio
companies rely on the capital markets to raise money to pay
their existing obligations. Their ability to access the capital
markets on attractive terms or at all may be affected by any of
the risks associated with energy companies described above, by
general economic and market conditions or by other factors. This
may in turn affect their ability to satisfy their obligations
with us.
|
|
|
|
Climate Change. There is evidence of global
climate change. Climate change creates physical and financial
risk and some of our portfolio companies may be adversely
affected by climate change. For example, customers of energy
companies needs vary with weather conditions, primarily
temperature and humidity. To the extent weather conditions are
affected by climate change, energy use could increase or
decrease depending on the duration and magnitude of any changes.
Increased energy use due to weather changes may require
additional investments by our portfolio companies in more
pipelines and other infrastructure to serve increased demand. A
decrease in energy use due to weather changes may affect our
portfolio companies financial condition, through decreased
revenues. Extreme weather conditions in general require more
system backup, adding to costs, and can contribute to increased
system stresses, including service interruptions. Energy
companies could also be affected by the potential for lawsuits
against or taxes or other regulatory costs imposed on greenhouse
gas emitters, based on links drawn between greenhouse gas
emissions and climate change.
|
Our
investments in prospective portfolio companies may be risky and
we could lose all or part of our investment.
Some of our portfolio companies have relatively short or no
operating histories. These companies are and will be subject to
all of the business risk and uncertainties associated with any
new business enterprise, including the risk that these companies
may not reach their investment objective and the value of our
investment in them may decline substantially or fall to zero.
19
In addition, investment in the middle market companies that we
are targeting involves a number of other significant risks,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
these companies may have limited financial resources and may be
unable to meet their obligations under their securities that we
hold, which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value
of their securities or of any collateral with respect to any
securities and a reduction in the likelihood of our realizing on
any guarantees we may have obtained in connection with our
investment;
|
|
|
|
they may have shorter operating histories, narrower product
lines and smaller market shares than larger businesses, which
tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors actions
and market conditions, as well as general economic downturns;
|
|
|
|
because many of these companies are privately held companies,
public information is generally not available about these
companies. As a result, we will depend on the ability of our
Investment Adviser to obtain adequate information to evaluate
these companies in making investment decisions. If our
Investment Adviser is unable to uncover all material information
about these companies, it may not make a fully informed
investment decision, and we may lose money on our investments;
|
|
|
|
they are more likely to depend on the management talents and
efforts of a small group of persons; therefore, the death,
disability, resignation or termination of one or more of these
persons could have a materially adverse impact on our portfolio
company and, in turn, on us;
|
|
|
|
they may have less predictable operating results, may from time
to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in changing
businesses with products subject to a risk of obsolescence and
may require substantial additional capital to support their
operations, finance expansion or maintain their competitive
position;
|
|
|
|
they may have difficulty accessing the capital markets to meet
future capital needs;
|
|
|
|
increased taxes, regulatory expense or the costs of changes to
the way they conduct business due to the effects of climate
change may adversely affect their business, financial structure
or prospects.
|
In addition, our executive officers, directors and our
Investment Adviser could, in the ordinary course of business, be
named as defendants in litigation arising from proposed
investments or from our investments in the portfolio companies.
Economic
recessions or downturns could impair our portfolio companies and
harm our operating results.
The U.S. financial markets have been experiencing a high
level of volatility, disruption and distress, which was
exacerbated by the failure of several major financial
institutions in the last few months of 2008. In addition, the
U.S. economy has been in a recession , the aftermath of
which may be severe and prolonged. Similar conditions have
occurred in the financial markets and economies of numerous
other countries and could worsen, both in the U.S. and
globally. Our portfolio companies will generally be affected by
the conditions and overall strength of the national, regional
and local economies, including interest rate fluctuations,
changes in the capital markets and changes in the prices of
their primary commodities and products. These factors also
impact the amount of residential, industrial and commercial
growth in the energy industry. Additionally, these factors could
adversely impact the customer base and customer collections of
our portfolio companies.
As a result, many of our portfolio companies may be susceptible
to economic slowdowns or recessions and may be unable to repay
our loans or meet other obligations during these periods.
Therefore, our non-performing assets are likely to increase, and
the value of our portfolio is likely to decrease, during these
periods. Adverse economic conditions also may decrease the value
of collateral securing some of our loans and the value of our
equity investments. Economic slowdowns or recessions could lead
to financial losses in our portfolio and a decrease in revenues,
net income and assets. Unfavorable economic conditions also
could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the
capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend
credit to us. These events could prevent us from increasing
investments and harm our operating results.
A portfolio companys failure to satisfy financial or
operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to
defaults and, potentially, termination of its loans and
foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger
20
cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize a portfolio
companys ability to meet its obligations under the debt or
equity securities that we hold. We may incur expenses to the
extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate
new terms, which may include the waiver of certain financial
covenants, with a defaulting portfolio company. In addition, if
one of our portfolio companies were to go bankrupt, even though
we may have structured our interest as senior debt or preferred
equity, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the
extent to which we actually provided managerial assistance to
that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might
re-characterize
our debt or equity holding and subordinate all or a portion of
our claim to those of other creditors.
The
lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our
business.
We make investments in private companies. A
portion of these investments may be subject to legal and other
restrictions on resale, transfer, pledge or other disposition or
will otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities.
The illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us
to sell such investments if the need arises. In addition, if we
are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio
quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at
which we have previously recorded our investments. In addition,
we face other restrictions on our ability to liquidate an
investment in a business entity to the extent that we or our
Investment Adviser has or could be deemed to have material
non-public information regarding such business entity.
We may
have limited access to information about privately held
companies in which we invest.
We invest primarily in privately-held
companies. Generally, little public information
exists about these companies, and we are required to rely on the
ability of our Investment Advisers investment
professionals to obtain adequate information to evaluate the
potential returns from investing in these companies. These
companies and their financial information are not subject to the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other rules that govern public companies.
If we are unable to uncover all material information about these
companies, we may not make a fully informed investment decision,
and we may lose money on our investment.
We may
not be in a position to control a portfolio investment when we
are a debt or minority equity investor and its management may
make decisions that could decrease the value of our
investment.
We make both debt and minority equity investments in portfolio
companies. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a
portfolio company may make business decisions with which we
disagree, and the management of such company, as representatives
of the holders of their common equity, may take risks or
otherwise act in ways that do not serve our interests. As a
result, a portfolio company may make decisions that could
decrease the value of our portfolio holdings.
Our
portfolio companies may incur debt or issue equity securities
that rank equally with, or senior to, our investments in such
companies.
We may invest in mezzanine debt and dividend-paying equity
securities issued by our portfolio companies. Our portfolio
companies usually have, or may be permitted to incur, other
debt, or issue other equity securities, that rank equally with,
or senior to, the securities in which we invest. By their terms,
such instruments may provide that the holders are entitled to
receive payment of dividends, interest or principal on or before
the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments in
respect of the securities in which we invest. Also, in the event
of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or
bankruptcy of a portfolio company, holders of securities ranking
senior to our investment in that portfolio company would
typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we
receive any distribution in respect of our investment. After
repaying the senior security holders, the portfolio company may
not have any remaining assets to use for repaying its obligation
to us. In the case of securities ranking equally with securities
in which we invest, we would have to share on an equal basis any
distributions with other security holders in the event of an
insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or
bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company.
21
We may
not be able to fully realize the value of the collateral
securing our debt investments.
Although a substantial amount of our debt investments are
protected by holding security interests in the assets of the
portfolio companies, we may not be able to fully realize the
value of the collateral securing our investments due to one or
more of the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
our debt investments are primarily made in the form of mezzanine
loans, therefore our liens on the collateral, if any, are
subordinated to those of the senior secured debt of the
portfolio companies, if any. As a result, we may not be able to
control remedies with respect to the collateral;
|
|
|
|
the collateral may not be valuable enough to satisfy all of the
obligations under our secured loan, particularly after giving
effect to the repayment of secured debt of the portfolio company
that ranks senior to our loan;
|
|
|
|
bankruptcy laws may limit our ability to realize value from the
collateral and may delay the realization process;
|
|
|
|
our rights in the collateral may be adversely affected by the
failure to perfect security interests in the collateral;
|
|
|
|
the need to obtain regulatory and contractual consents could
impair or impede how effectively the collateral would be
liquidated and could affect the value received; and
|
|
|
|
some or all of the collateral may be illiquid and may have no
readily ascertainable market value. The liquidity and value of
the collateral could be impaired as a result of changing
economic conditions, competition, and other factors, including
the availability of suitable buyers.
|
Our
investments in foreign securities may involve significant risks
in addition to the risks inherent in U.S.
investments.
Our investment strategy contemplates potential investments in
securities of foreign companies. Investing in foreign companies
may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with
investing in U.S. companies. These risks include changes in
exchange control regulations, political and social instability,
expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes, less liquid markets
and less available information than is generally the case in the
United States, higher transaction costs, less government
supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, less developed
bankruptcy laws, difficulty in enforcing contractual
obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards
and greater price volatility.
Although currently most of our investments are, and we expect
that most of our investments will be,
U.S. dollar-denominated, investments that are denominated
in a foreign currency will be subject to the risk that the value
of a particular currency will change in relation to one or more
other currencies. Among the factors that may affect currency
values are trade balances, the level of short-term interest
rates, differences in relative values of similar assets in
different currencies, long-term opportunities for investment and
capital appreciation, and political developments.
We may
expose ourselves to risks if we engage in hedging
transactions.
We may employ hedging techniques to minimize certain investment
risks, such as fluctuations in interest and currency exchange
rates, but we can offer no assurance that such strategies will
be effective. If we engage in hedging transactions, we may
expose ourselves to risks associated with such transactions. We
may utilize instruments such as forward contracts, currency
options and interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors to
seek to hedge against fluctuations in the relative values of our
portfolio positions from changes in currency exchange rates and
market interest rates. Hedging against a decline in the values
of our portfolio positions does not eliminate the possibility of
fluctuations in the values of such positions or prevent losses
if the values of such positions decline. However, such hedging
can establish other positions designed to gain from those same
developments, thereby offsetting the decline in the value of
such portfolio positions. Such hedging transactions may also
limit the opportunity for gain if the values of the portfolio
positions should increase. Moreover, it may not be possible to
hedge against an exchange rate or interest rate fluctuation that
is so generally anticipated that we are not able to enter into a
hedging transaction at an acceptable price.
22
The success of our hedging transactions depends on our ability
to correctly predict movements, currencies and interest rates.
Therefore, while we may enter into such transactions to seek to
reduce currency exchange rate and interest rate risks,
unanticipated changes in currency exchange rates or interest
rates may result in poorer overall investment performance than
if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. The
degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments
used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio
positions being hedged may vary. Moreover, for a variety of
reasons, we may not seek to establish a perfect correlation
between such hedging instruments and the portfolio holdings
being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from
achieving the intended hedge and expose us to risk of loss. In
addition, it may not be possible to hedge fully or perfectly
against currency fluctuations affecting the value of securities
denominated in
non-U.S. currencies.
Our
Board of Directors may change our operating policies and
strategies without prior notice or stockholder approval, the
effects of which may be adverse to us and could impair the value
of our stockholders investment.
Our Board of Directors has the authority to modify or waive our
current operating policies and our strategies without prior
notice and without stockholder approval. We cannot predict the
effect any changes to our current operating policies and
strategies would have on our business, financial condition, and
value of our common stock. However, the effects might be
adverse, which could negatively impact our ability to pay
dividends and cause stockholders to lose all or part of their
investment.
Risks
Relating To Our Securities
Investing
in our securities may involve a high degree of
risk.
The investments we make in accordance with our investment
objective may result in a higher amount of risk than alternative
investment options and volatility or loss of principal. Our
investments in portfolio companies may be speculative and
aggressive, and therefore, an investment in our shares may not
be suitable for someone with low risk tolerance.
The
market price of our securities may fluctuate
significantly.
The market price and liquidity of the market for our securities
may be significantly affected by numerous factors, some of which
are beyond our control and may not be directly related to our
operating performance. These factors include:
|
|
|
|
|
significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of
securities of business development companies or other companies
in the energy industry, which are not necessarily related to the
operating performance of these companies;
|
|
|
|
changes in regulatory policies or tax guidelines, particularly
with respect to RICs or business development companies;
|
|
|
|
loss of RIC qualification;
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings or variations in operating results;
|
|
|
|
changes in the value of our portfolio of investments;
|
|
|
|
any shortfall in revenue or net income or any increase in losses
from levels expected by investors or securities analysts;
|
|
|
|
departure of one or more of Prospect Capital Managements
key personnel;
|
|
|
|
operating performance of companies comparable to us;
|
|
|
|
changes in prevailing interest rates;
|
|
|
|
litigation matters;
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
general economic trends and other external factors; and
|
|
|
|
loss of a major funding source.
|
Sales
of substantial amounts of our securities in the public market
may have an adverse effect on the market price of our
securities.
As of February 25, 2010, we have 63,586,731 shares of
common stock outstanding. Sales of substantial amounts of our
securities or the availability of such securities for sale could
adversely affect the prevailing market price for our securities.
If this occurs and continues it could impair our ability to
raise additional capital through the sale of securities should
we desire to do so.
There
is a risk that you may not receive distributions or that our
distributions may not grow over time.
We have made and intend to continue to make distributions on a
quarterly basis to our stockholders out of assets legally
available for distribution. We cannot assure you that we will
achieve investment results or maintain a tax status that will
allow or require any specified level of cash distributions or
year-to-year
increases in cash distributions. In addition, due to the asset
coverage test applicable to us as a business development
company, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions.
Provisions
of the Maryland General Corporation Law and of our charter and
bylaws could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse impact
on the price of our common stock.
Our charter and bylaws and the Maryland General Corporation Law
contain provisions that may have the effect of delaying,
deferring or preventing a transaction or a change in control
that might involve a premium price for our stockholders or
otherwise be in their best interest. These provisions may
prevent shareholders from being able to sell shares of its
common stock at a premium over the current of prevailing market
prices.
Our charter provides for the classification of our Board of
Directors into three classes of directors, serving staggered
three-year terms, which may render a change of control or
removal of our incumbent management more difficult. Furthermore,
any and all vacancies on our Board of Directors will be filled
generally only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the
remaining directors in office, even if the remaining directors
do not constitute a quorum, and any director elected to fill a
vacancy will serve for the remainder of the full term until a
successor is elected and qualifies.
Our Board of Directors is authorized to create and issue new
series of shares, to classify or reclassify any unissued shares
of stock into one or more classes or series, including preferred
stock and, without stockholder approval, to amend our charter to
increase or decrease the number of shares of common stock that
we have authority to issue, which could have the effect of
diluting a stockholders ownership interest. Prior to the
issuance of shares of common stock of each class or series,
including any reclassified series, our Board of Directors is
required by our governing documents to set the terms,
preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers,
restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other
distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of
redemption for each class or series of shares of stock.
Our charter and bylaws also provide that our Board of Directors
has the exclusive power to adopt, alter or repeal any provision
of our bylaws, and to make new bylaws. The Maryland General
Corporation Law also contains certain provisions that may limit
the ability of a third party to acquire control of us, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
The Maryland Business Combination Act, which, subject to certain
limitations, prohibits certain business combinations between us
and an interested stockholder (defined generally as
any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power
of the common stock or an affiliate thereof) for five years
after the most recent date on which the stockholder becomes an
interested stockholder and, thereafter, imposes special minimum
price provisions and special stockholder voting requirements on
these combinations; and
|
|
|
|
The Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act, which provides that
control shares of a Maryland corporation (defined as
shares of common stock which, when aggregated with other shares
of common stock controlled by the stockholder, entitles the
stockholder to exercise one of three increasing ranges of
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
voting power in electing directors, as described more fully
below) acquired in a control share acquisition
(defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or
control of control shares) have no voting rights
except to the extent approved by stockholders by the affirmative
vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast
on the matter, excluding all interested shares of common stock.
|
The provisions of the Maryland Business Combination Act will not
apply, however, if our Board of Directors adopts a resolution
that any business combination between us and any other person
will be exempt from the provisions of the Maryland Business
Combination Act. Although our Board of Directors has adopted
such a resolution, there can be no assurance that this
resolution will not be altered or repealed in whole or in part
at any time. If the resolution is altered or repealed, the
provisions of the Maryland Business Combination Act may
discourage others from trying to acquire control of us.
As permitted by Maryland law, our bylaws contain a provision
exempting from the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act any
and all acquisitions by any person of our common stock. Although
our bylaws include such a provision, such a provision may also
be amended or eliminated by our Board of Directors at any time
in the future, provided that we will notify the Division of
Investment Management at the SEC prior to amending or
eliminating this provision.
We may
in the future choose to pay dividends in our own stock, in which
case our shareholders may be required to pay tax in excess of
the cash they receive.
We may distribute taxable dividends that are payable in part in
our stock. Under IRS Revenue Procedure
2010-12,
which extended and modified Revenue Procedure
2009-15, up
to 90% of any such taxable dividend for 2009, 2010, and 2011
could be payable in our stock. The IRS has also issued (and
where Revenue Procedure
2009-15 or
2010-12 is
not currently applicable, the IRS continues to issue) private
letter rulings on cash/stock dividends paid by regulated
investment companies and real estate investment trusts using a
20% cash standard (instead of the 10% cash standard of Revenue
Procedures
2009-15 and
2010-12) if
certain requirements are satisfied. Taxable stockholders
receiving such dividends would be required to include the full
amount of the dividend as ordinary income (or as long-term
capital gain to the extent such distribution is properly
designated as a capital gain dividend) to the extent of its
current and accumulated earnings and profits for United States
federal income tax purposes. As a result, a
U.S. stockholder may be required to pay tax with respect to
such dividends in excess of any cash received. If a
U.S. stockholder sells the stock it receives as a dividend
in order to pay this tax, it may be subject to transaction fees
(e.g. broker fees or transfer agent fees) and the sales proceeds
may be less than the amount included in income with respect to
the dividend, depending on the market price of our stock at the
time of the sale. Furthermore, with respect to
non-U.S. stockholders,
we may be required to withhold U.S. tax with respect to
such dividends, including in respect of all or a portion of such
dividend that is payable in stock. In addition, if a significant
number of our stockholders determine to sell shares of its stock
in order to pay taxes owed on dividends, it may put downward
pressure on the trading price of our stock. It is unclear
whether and to what extent we will be able to pay dividends in
cash and our stock (whether pursuant to Revenue Procedure
2009-15 or
2010-12, a
private letter ruling, or otherwise.
25
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(All figures in this section are in thousands except share,
per share and other data)
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with
our financial statements and related notes and other financial
information appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. In addition
to historical information, the following discussion and other
parts of this prospectus contain forward-looking information
that involves risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could
differ materially from those anticipated by such forward-looking
information due to the factors discussed under Risk
Factors and Forward-Looking Statements
appearing elsewhere herein.
Note on
Forward Looking Statements
Some of the statements in this report constitute forward-looking
statements, which relate to future events or our future
performance or financial condition. The forward-looking
statements contained herein involve risks and uncertainties,
including statements as to:
|
|
|
|
|
our future operating results;
|
|
|
|
our business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio
companies;
|
|
|
|
the impact of investments that we expect to make;
|
|
|
|
our contractual arrangements and relationships with third
parties;
|
|
|
|
the dependence of our future success on the general economy and
its impact on the industries in which we invest;
|
|
|
|
the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their
objectives;
|
|
|
|
our expected financings and investments;
|
|
|
|
the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital; and
|
|
|
|
the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our
portfolio companies.
|
We generally use words such as anticipates,
believes, expects, intends
and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.
Our actual results could differ materially from those projected
in the forward-looking statements for any reason, including the
factors set forth in Risk Factors and elsewhere in
this prospectus. These forward-looking statements do not meet
the safe harbor for forward-looking statements pursuant to
Section 27A of the Securities Act.
We have based the forward-looking statements included in herein
on information available to us on the date of this document, and
we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking
statements. Although we undertake no obligation to revise or
update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise, you are advised to
consult any additional disclosures that we may make directly to
you or through reports that we in the future may file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including
any annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
and current reports on
Form 8-K.
General
We are a financial services company that primarily lends to and
invests in middle market privately-held companies. We are a
closed-end investment company that has filed an election to be
treated as a business development company under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, or the 1940 Act. We invest primarily in
senior and subordinated debt and equity of companies in need of
capital for acquisitions, divestitures, growth, development,
project financing and recapitalization. We work with the
management teams or financial sponsors to seek investments with
historical cash flows, asset collateral or contracted pro-forma
cash flows.
26
We seek to be a long-term investor with our portfolio companies.
Since the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, we have invested
primarily in industries related to the industrial/energy
economy. Since then, we have widened our strategy to focus in
other sectors of the economy and continue to diversify our
portfolio holdings.
Patriot
Acquisition
On December 2, 2009, we acquired the outstanding shares of
Patriot Capital Funding, Inc. (Patriot) common stock
for $201,083. Under the terms of the merger agreement, Patriot
common shareholders received 0.363992 shares of our common
stock for each share of Patriot common stock, resulting in
8,444,068 shares of common stock being issued by us. In
connection with the transaction, we repaid all the outstanding
borrowings of Patriot, in compliance with the merger agreement.
On December 2, 2009, Patriot made a final dividend equal to
its undistributed net ordinary income and capital gains of $0.38
per share. In accordance with a recent IRS revenue procedure,
the dividend was paid 10% in cash and 90% in newly issued shares
of Patriots common stock. The exchange ratio was adjusted
to give effect to the tax distribution.
The merger has been accounted for as an acquisition of Patriot
by Prospect Capital Corporation (Prospect) in
accordance with acquisition method of accounting as detailed in
ASC 805, Business Combinations (ASC 805). The
fair value of the consideration paid was allocated to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values as
the date of acquisition. As described in more detail in ASC 805,
goodwill, if any, would have been recognized as of the
acquisition date, if the consideration transferred exceeded the
fair value of identifiable net assets acquired. As of the
acquisition date, the fair value of the identifiable net assets
acquired exceeded the fair value of the consideration
transferred, and we recognized the excess as a gain. A gain of
$5,714 was recorded by Prospect in the quarter ended
December 31, 2009 related to the acquisition of Patriot.
The acquisition of Patriot was negotiated in July 2009 with the
purchase agreement being signed on August 3, 2009. Between
July 2009 and December 2, 2009, our valuation of certain of
the investments acquired from Patriot increased due to market
improvement, which resulted in the recognition of the gain at
closing.
The purchase price has been allocated to the assets acquired and
the liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as
summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (to repay Patriot debt)
|
|
$
|
107,313
|
|
Cash (to fund purchase of restricted stock from former Patriot
employees)
|
|
|
970
|
|
Common stock issued(1)
|
|
|
92,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
|
201,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
Investments(2)
|
|
|
207,126
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,697
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired
|
|
|
212,682
|
|
Other liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(5,885
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
|
206,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary gain on Patriot acquisition(3)
|
|
$
|
5,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The value of the shares of common stock exchanged with the
Patriot common shareholders was based upon the closing price of
our common stock on December 2, 2009, the price immediately
prior to the closing of the transaction. |
|
(2) |
|
The fair value of Patriots investments were determined by
the Board of Directors in conjunction with an independent
valuation agent. This valuation resulted in a purchase price
which was $98,150 below the amortized cost of such investments.
For those assets which are performing, Prospect will record the
accretion to par value in interest income over the remaining
term of the investment. |
27
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The preliminary gain has been determined based upon the
estimated value of certain liabilities which are not yet
settled. Any changes to such accruals will be recoded in future
periods as an adjustment to such gain. We do not believe such
adjustments will be material. |
During the period from the acquisition of Patriot on
December 2, 2009 to December 31, 2009, we recognized
$7,495 of interest income from the assets acquired from Patriot.
Included in this amount is $4,560 resulting from the
acceleration of purchase discounts from the early repayments of
three loans, three revolving lines of credit and the sale of one
investment position.
Market
Conditions
In 2008 and 2009, the financial services industry has been
negatively affected by turmoil in the global capital markets.
What began in 2007 as a deterioration of credit quality in
subprime residential mortgages has spread rapidly to other
credit markets. Market liquidity and credit quality conditions
continue to remain weaker today than two years ago.
We believe that Prospect Capital is well positioned to navigate
through these adverse market conditions. As a business
development company, we are limited to a maximum 1 to 1 debt to
equity ratio, and as of December 31, 2009, we had $62,914
available under our credit facility, of which $10,000 was
outstanding. In addition, we had $105,050 of eligible assets
from the Patriot acquisition in the process of being pledged to
the facility which will generate an additional $67,086 of
availability. Further, as we make additional investments that
are eligible to be pledged under the credit facility, we will
generate additional availability. The revolving period for the
extended credit facility continues until June 25, 2010,
with an amortization running to June 25, 2011.
We also continue to generate liquidity through public and
private stock offerings. On July 7, 2009 we completed a
public stock offering for 5,175,000 shares of our common
stock at $9.00 per share, raising $46,575 of gross proceeds. On
August 20, 2009 and September 24, 2009, we issued
3,449,686 shares and 2,807,111 shares, respectively,
of our common stock at $8.50 and $9.00 per share, respectively,
in private stock offerings, raising $29,322, and $25,264 of
gross proceeds, respectively. Concurrent with the sale of these
shares, we entered into a registration rights agreement in which
we granted the purchasers certain registration rights with
respect to the shares. Under the terms and conditions of the
registration rights agreement, we filed with the SEC a
post-effective amendment to the registration statement on
Form N-2
on November 6, 2009. Such amendment was declared effective
by the SEC on November 9, 2009.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP) requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of income and expenses during the reported
period. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets
and any other parameters used in determining these estimates
could cause actual results to differ.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations are based upon our financial statements,
which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The
preparation of these financial statements requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Changes in the
economic environment, financial markets and any other parameters
used in determining such estimates could cause actual results to
differ materially. In addition to the discussion below, our
critical accounting policies are further described in the notes
to the financial statements.
Basis
of Consolidation
Under the 1940 Act rules, the regulations pursuant to
Article 6 of
Regulation S-X,
and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies, we are
precluded from consolidating any entity other than another
investment company or an operating company which provides
substantially all of its services and benefits to us. Our
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 financial
statements include our accounts and the accounts of Prospect
Capital Funding, LLC, our only wholly-owned, closely-managed
28
subsidiary that is also an investment company. All intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Investment
Classification
We are a non-diversified company within the meaning of the 1940
Act. We classify our investments by level of control. As defined
in the 1940 Act, control investments are those where there is
the ability or power to exercise a controlling influence over
the management or policies of a company. Control is generally
deemed to exist when a company or individual possesses or has
the right to acquire within 60 days or less, a beneficial
ownership of 25% or more of the voting securities of an investee
company. Affiliated investments and affiliated companies are
defined by a lesser degree of influence and are deemed to exist
through the possession outright or via the right to acquire
within 60 days or less, beneficial ownership of 5% or more
of the outstanding voting securities of another person.
Investments are recognized when we assume an obligation to
acquire a financial instrument and assume the risks for gains or
losses related to that instrument. Investments are derecognized
when we assume an obligation to sell a financial instrument and
forego the risks for gains or losses related to that instrument.
Specifically, we record all security transactions on a trade
date basis. Investments in other, non-security financial
instruments are recorded on the basis of subscription date or
redemption date, as applicable. Amounts for investments
recognized or derecognized but not yet settled are reported as
Receivables for investments sold and Payables for investments
purchased, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements of
Assets and Liabilities.
Investment
Valuation
Our Board of Directors has established procedures for the
valuation of our investment portfolio. These procedures are
detailed below.
Investments for which market quotations are readily available
are valued at such market quotations.
For most of our investments, market quotations are not
available. With respect to investments for which market
quotations are not readily available or when such market
quotations are deemed not to represent fair value, our Board of
Directors has approved a multi-step valuation process each
quarter, as described below:
1) Each portfolio company or investment is reviewed by our
investment professionals with the independent valuation firm
engaged by our Board of Directors;
2) the independent valuation firm conducts independent
appraisals and makes their own independent assessment;
3) the audit committee of our Board of Directors reviews
and discusses the preliminary valuation of our Investment
Adviser and that of the independent valuation firm; and
4) the Board of Directors discusses the valuations and
determines the fair value of each investment in our portfolio in
good faith based on the input of our Investment Adviser, the
independent valuation firm and the audit committee.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC or Codification) 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820). ASC 820
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. We adopted ASC 820 on a prospective basis
beginning in the quarter ended September 30, 2008.
ASC 820 classifies the inputs used to measure these fair values
into the following hierarchy:
Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities, accessible by the Company
at the measurement date.
Level 2: Quoted prices for similar assets
or liabilities in active markets, or quoted prices for identical
or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active,
or other observable inputs other than quoted prices.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs for the
asset or liability.
29
In all cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which
the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been
determined based on the lowest level of input that is
significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the
significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement
in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific
to each investment.
The changes to generally accepted accounting principles from the
application of ASC 820 relate to the definition of fair value,
framework for measuring fair value, and the expanded disclosures
about fair value measurements. ASC 820 applies to fair value
measurements already required or permitted by other standards.
In accordance with ASC 820, the fair value of our investments is
defined as the price that we would receive upon selling an
investment in an orderly transaction to an independent buyer in
the principal or most advantageous market in which that
investment is transacted.
In April 2009, the FASB issued ASC
820-10-65,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity
for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (ASC
820-10-65).
This update provides further clarification for ASC 820 in
markets that are not active and provides additional guidance for
determining when the volume of trading level of activity for an
asset or liability has significantly decreased and for
identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not
orderly. ASC
820-10-65 is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after
June 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC
820-10-65
for the three and six months ended December 31, 2009, did
not have any effect on our net asset value, financial position
or results of operations as there was no change to the fair
value measurement principles set forth in ASC 820.
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
2010-06,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving
Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (ASC
2010-06).
ASU 2010-06
amends ASC
820-10 and
clarifies and provides additional disclosure requirements
related to recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements
and employers disclosures about postretirement benefit
plan assets. ASU
2010-06 is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2009. Our management does not believe
that the adoption of the amended guidance in ASC
820-10 will
have a significant effect on our financial statements.
Federal
and State Income Taxes
We have elected to be treated as a regulated investment company
and intend to continue to comply with the requirements of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code), applicable
to regulated investment companies. We are required to distribute
at least 90% of our investment company taxable income and intend
to distribute (or retain through a deemed distribution) all of
our investment company taxable income and net capital gain to
stockholders; therefore, we have made no provision for income
taxes. The character of income and gains that we will distribute
is determined in accordance with income tax regulations that may
differ from GAAP. Book and tax basis differences relating to
stockholder dividends and distributions and other permanent book
and tax differences are reclassified to paid-in capital.
If we do not distribute (or are not deemed to have distributed)
at least 98% of our annual taxable income in the calendar year
earned, we will generally be required to pay an excise tax equal
to 4% of the amount by which 98% of our annual taxable income
exceeds the distributions from such taxable income for the year.
To the extent that we determine that our estimated current year
annual taxable income will be in excess of estimated current
year dividend distributions from such taxable income, we accrue
excise taxes, if any, on estimated excess taxable income as
taxable income is earned using an annual effective excise tax
rate. The annual effective excise tax rate is determined by
dividing the estimated annual excise tax by the estimated annual
taxable income.
We adopted FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes (ASC
740). ASC 740 provides guidance for how uncertain tax
positions should be recognized, measured, presented, and
disclosed in the financial statements. ASC 740 requires the
evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the
course of preparing our tax returns to determine whether the tax
positions are more-likely-than-not of being
sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not
deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are recorded
as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Adoption of ASC
740 was applied to all open tax years as of July 1, 2007.
The adoption of ASC 740 did not have an effect on our net asset
value, financial condition or results of operations as there was
no liability for
30
unrecognized tax benefits and no change to our beginning net
asset value. As of December 31, 2009 and for the three and
six months then ended, we did not have a liability for any
unrecognized tax benefits. Managements determinations
regarding ASC 740 may be subject to review and adjustment
at a later date based upon factors including, but not limited
to, an on-going analysis of tax laws, regulations and
interpretations thereof.
Revenue
Recognition
Realized gains or losses on the sale of investments are
calculated using the specific identification method.
Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and
accretion of discount, is recorded on an accrual basis.
Origination, closing
and/or
commitment fees associated with investments in portfolio
companies are accreted into interest income over the respective
terms of the applicable loans. Upon the prepayment of a loan or
debt security, any prepayment penalties and unamortized loan
origination, closing and commitment fees are recorded as
interest income.
Loans are placed on non-accrual status when principal or
interest payments are past due 90 days or more or when
there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be
collected. Unpaid accrued interest is generally reversed when a
loan is placed on non-accrual status. Interest payments received
on non-accrual loans may be recognized as income or applied to
principal depending upon managements judgment. Non-accrual
loans are restored to accrual status when past due principal and
interest is paid and in managements judgment, are likely
to remain current. As of December 31, 2009, approximately
5.7% of our net assets are in non-accrual status.
Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.
Structuring fees and similar fees are recognized as income as
earned, usually when paid. Structuring fees, excess deal
deposits, net profits interests and overriding royalty interests
are included in other income.
Statement
of Assets and Liabilities Overview
During the six months ended December 31, 2009, net assets
have increased by $104,881 from $532,596 as of June 30,
2009 to $637,477 as of December 31, 2009. This net increase
in assets primarily resulted from $195,833 of capital share
transactions including 8,444,068 of shares issued in conjunction
with the Patriot Acquisition, offset by $67,721 in dividends
declared to our stockholders. During this six month period we
recognized net investment income of $29,243, a decrease in net
assets due to realized losses of $51,229 and a decrease in net
assets due to changes in unrealized depreciation of investments
of $1,245.
The aggregate fair value of our portfolio investments was
$648,135 and $547,168 as of December 31, 2009 and
June 30, 2009, respectively. During the six months ended
December 31, 2009, our net cost of investments increased by
$102,212, or 19.2%, primarily from the acquisition of Patriot.
At December 31, 2009, we were invested in 55 long-term
portfolio investments.
Investment
Activity
During the six months ended December 31, 2009, we acquired
$207,126 of investments from Patriot, completed follow-on
investments in existing portfolio companies totaling
approximately $7,321, and recorded PIK interest of $2,059,
resulting in gross investment originations with a cost basis of
$216,506. The more significant of these investments are
described briefly in the following:
During the six months ended December 31, 2009, we made
follow-on secured debt investments of $1,423 in Iron Horse
Coiled Tubing, Inc. (Iron Horse) in support of the
build out of additional equipment and to fund working capital
requirements.
During the six months ended December 31, 2009, we provided
additional fundings of $3,376 to Yatesville Coal Holdings, Inc.
(Yatesville) to fund ongoing operations.
On October 5, 2009 we purchased an additional secured debt
investment of $1,675 in Resco Products, Inc. (Resco)
at a discount of $670, increasing our cost basis by $1,005 in
this investment.
31
On October 30, 2009, we made a follow-on secured
subordinated debt investment of $500 in Ajax Rolled
Ring & Machine (Ajax).
On December 2, 2009, we acquired portfolio investments with
a face amount of $289,030 for $207,126 from Patriot.
During the six months ended December 31, 2009, we
closed-out six positions which are briefly described below.
On August 31, 2009, C&J Cladding, LLC
(C&J) repaid the $3,150 loan receivable to us
and we received an additional 5% prepayment penalty totaling
$158. We continue to hold warrants for common units in this
investment.
On September 4, 2009, Peerless Manufacturing Co. repaid the
$20,000 loan receivable to us.
On December 4, 2009, CS Operating, LLC repaid the $4,460
loan receivable to us.
On December 10, 2009, Resco repaid the $11,425 loan
receivable to us.
On December 17, 2009, ADAPCO, Inc. (ADAPCO)
repaid the $7,466 loan receivable to us. We continue to hold
warrants for common stock in this investment.
On December 18, 2009, Quartermaster, Inc.
(Quartermaster) repaid the $11,274 loan receivable
to us.
On December 31, 2009, we sold our investment in Aylward
Enterprises, LLC (Aylward) for net amount of $4,775.
During the six months ended December 31, 2009, we also
received principal amortization payments of $7,184 on several
loans.
On September 30, 2008, we settled our net profits interests
(NPIs) in IEC Systems LP (IEC) and
Advanced Rig Services LLC (ARS) with the companies
for a combined $12,576. IEC and ARS originally issued the NPIs
to us when we loaned a combined $25,600 to IEC and ARS on
November 20, 2007. In conjunction with the NPI realization,
we recognized other income of $12,576 simultaneously reinvested
the $12,576 as incremental senior secured debt in IEC and ARS.
The incremental debt will amortize over the period ending
November 20, 2010.
The following is a
quarter-by-quarter
summary of our investment activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter-End
|
|
Acquisitions(1)
|
|
|
Dispositions(2)
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
210,438
|
|
|
$
|
45,494
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
6,066
|
|
|
|
24,241
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
7,929
|
|
|
|
3,148
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
6,356
|
|
|
|
10,782
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
13,564
|
|
|
|
2,128
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
70,456
|
|
|
|
10,949
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
118,913
|
|
|
|
61,148
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
31,794
|
|
|
|
28,891
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
120,846
|
|
|
|
19,223
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
40,394
|
|
|
|
17,949
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
130,345
|
|
|
|
9,857
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
19,701
|
|
|
|
7,731
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
62,679
|
|
|
|
17,796
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
24,677
|
|
|
|
2,781
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
42,783
|
|
|
|
5,752
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
15,732
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,523
|
|
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
25,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
17,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
7,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
23,771
|
|
|
|
32,083
|
|
September 30, 2004
|
|
|
30,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since inception
|
|
$
|
1,027,033
|
|
|
$
|
304,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes new deals, additional fundings, refinancings and PIK
interest. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes scheduled principal payments, prepayments and
refinancings. |
32
Investment
Holdings
As of December 31, 2009, we continue to pursue our
investment strategy. Despite our name change to Prospect
Capital Corporation and the termination of our policy to
invest at least 80% of our net assets in energy companies in May
2007, we currently have a concentration of investments in
companies in the energy and energy related industries. This
concentration continues to decrease as we make investments
outside of the energy and energy related industries. Some of the
companies in which we invest have relatively short or no
operating histories. These companies are and will be subject to
all of the business risk and uncertainties associated with any
new business enterprise, including the risk that these companies
may not reach their investment objective or the value of our
investment in them may decline substantially or fall to zero.
Our portfolio had an annualized current yield of 15.6% and 16.0%
across all our long-term debt and certain equity investments as
of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. At December 31, 2009, this yield includes
interest from all of our long-term investments as well as
dividends from Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc. (GSHI)
and NRG Manufacturing, Inc. (NRG). We expect the
current yield to decline over time as add to the portfolio.
Monetization of other equity positions that we hold is not
included in this yield calculation. In each of our portfolio
companies, we hold equity positions, ranging from minority
interests to majority stakes, which we expect over time to
contribute to our investment returns. Some of these equity
positions include features such as contractual minimum internal
rates of returns, preferred distributions, flip structures and
other features expected to generate additional investment
returns, as well as contractual protections and preferences over
junior equity, in addition to the yield and security offered by
our cash flow and collateral debt protections.
We classify our investments by level of control. As defined in
the 1940 Act, control investments are those where there is the
ability or power to exercise a controlling influence over the
management or policies of a company. Control is generally deemed
to exist when a company or individual possesses or has the right
to acquire within 60 days or less, a beneficial ownership
of 25% or more of the voting securities of an investee company.
Affiliated investments and affiliated companies are defined by a
lesser degree of influence and are deemed to exist through the
possession outright or via the right to acquire within
60 days or less, beneficial ownership of 5% or more of the
outstanding voting securities of another person.
As of December 31, 2009, we own controlling interests in
Ajax, AWCNC, LLC, C&J, Change Clean Energy Holdings, Inc.
(CCEHI), Coalbed, Inc./Coalbed, LLC (formerly
Conquest Cherokee, LLC) (Coalbed), Fischbein, LLC
(Fischbein), Freedom Marine Services LLC
(Freedom Marine), GSHI, Integrated Contract
Services, Inc. (ICS), Iron Horse, NRG, Nupla
Corporation (Nupla), R-V Industries, Inc.
(R-V), Sidumpr Trailer Company, Inc.
(Sidumpr) and Yatesville. We also own an
affiliated interest in Appalachian Energy Holdings, LLC
(AEH), Biotronic NeuroNetwork
(Biotronic), Boxercraft Incorporated
(Boxercraft), KTPS Holdings, LLC (KTPS),
Miller Petroleum, Inc. (Miller), Smart, LLC
(Smart) and Sport Helmets Holdings, LLC (Sport
Helmets).
The following is a summary of our investment portfolio by level
of control:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Level of Control
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Control
|
|
$
|
165,867
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
191,898
|
|
|
|
28.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
187,105
|
|
|
|
29.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
206,332
|
|
|
|
31.9
|
%
|
Affiliate
|
|
|
68,052
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
66,479
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
33,544
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
32,254
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
|
|
|
399,717
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
%
|
|
|
389,758
|
|
|
|
58.0
|
%
|
|
|
310,775
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
%
|
|
|
308,582
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
%
|
Money Market Funds
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
$
|
657,054
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
671,553
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
630,159
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
645,903
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
The following is our investment portfolio presented by type of
investment at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009,
respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Level of Control
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Money Market Funds
|
|
$
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
Revolving Line of Credit
|
|
|
2,041
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Senior Secured Debt
|
|
|
306,009
|
|
|
|
46.6
|
%
|
|
|
281,321
|
|
|
|
41.9
|
%
|
|
|
232,534
|
|
|
|
36.9
|
%
|
|
|
220,993
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
%
|
Subordinated Secured Debt
|
|
|
272,320
|
|
|
|
41.4
|
%
|
|
|
239,968
|
|
|
|
35.7
|
%
|
|
|
251,292
|
|
|
|
39.9
|
%
|
|
|
194,547
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
%
|
Subordinated Unsecured Debt
|
|
|
15,185
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
15,771
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
15,065
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
16,331
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
11,484
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
6,106
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
10,432
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
4,139
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
18,713
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
82,213
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
|
|
16,310
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
89,278
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
Membership Interests
|
|
|
5,124
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
9,287
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
3,031
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
7,270
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
Overriding Royalty Interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2,762
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
3,483
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Net Profit Interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2,561
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Warrants
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
7,243
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
8,566
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
$
|
657,054
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
671,553
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
630,159
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
645,903
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is our investment portfolio presented by
geographic location of the investment at December 31, 2009
and June 30, 2009, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Level of Control
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
$
|
20,717
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,318
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
19,344
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,606
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
Midwest US
|
|
|
115,332
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
|
122,125
|
|
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
|
|
77,681
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
84,097
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
Northeast US
|
|
|
61,171
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
53,823
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
44,875
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
47,049
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
Southeast US
|
|
|
189,313
|
|
|
|
28.8
|
%
|
|
|
152,209
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
|
|
164,652
|
|
|
|
26.1
|
%
|
|
|
101,710
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
Southwest US
|
|
|
183,428
|
|
|
|
27.9
|
%
|
|
|
245,792
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
%
|
|
|
178,993
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
%
|
|
|
253,615
|
|
|
|
39.3
|
%
|
Western US
|
|
|
63,675
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
61,868
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
|
|
45,879
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
48,091
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
Money Market Funds
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
$
|
657,054
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
671,553
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
630,159
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
645,903
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is our investment portfolio presented by industry
sector of the investment at December 31, 2009 and
June 30, 2009, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Level of Control
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Aerospace and Defense
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Automobile
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Biomass Power
|
|
|
2,825
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Construction Services
|
|
|
5,028
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
5,017
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Contracting
|
|
|
16,652
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
5,275
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
16,652
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
Ecological
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Electronics
|
|
|
14,910
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
14,994
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Financial Services
|
|
|
25,685
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
24,511
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
25,424
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
23,073
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
Food Products
|
|
|
34,634
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
37,412
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
27,413
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
29,416
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
Gas Gathering and Processing
|
|
|
35,003
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
85,187
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
|
35,003
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
85,187
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
Healthcare
|
|
|
88,217
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
92,253
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
57,535
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
|
60,293
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Level of Control
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Home and Office Furnishings, Housewares and Durable
|
|
|
2,436
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
2,432
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Insurance
|
|
|
3,873
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Machinery
|
|
|
26,952
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
27,088
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
80,590
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
83,112
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
90,978
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
|
|
110,929
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
Metal Services and Minerals
|
|
|
9,492
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
12,180
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
3,302
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
7,133
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
Mining, Steel, Iron and Non-Precious Metals and Coal Production
|
|
|
10,527
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
10,705
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
48,890
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
13,097
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
Oil and Gas Production
|
|
|
104,469
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
|
|
93,904
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
|
104,183
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
|
|
104,806
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
Oilfield Fabrication
|
|
|
32,337
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
32,337
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
34,247
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
34,931
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
Personal and Nondurable Consumer Products
|
|
|
28,705
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
28,845
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
|
11,952
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
11,949
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
11,452
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
Printing and Publishing
|
|
|
7,640
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
7,803
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Production Services
|
|
|
20,717
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
12,318
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
19,344
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
12,606
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
Retail
|
|
|
14,670
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
2,388
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
14,623
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
6,272
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
Shipping Vessels
|
|
|
7,899
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
6,181
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
7,160
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
7,381
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
Specialty Minerals
|
|
|
15,814
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
17,806
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
15,814
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
18,924
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
Technical Services
|
|
|
11,373
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
11,615
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
11,360
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
11,730
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
Textiles and Leather
|
|
|
20,171
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
19,566
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Money Market Funds
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
$
|
657,054
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
671,553
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
630,159
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
645,903
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
Valuation
In determining the fair value of our portfolio investments at
December 31, 2009, the Audit Committee considered
valuations from the independent valuation firm and from
management having an aggregate range of $604,614 to $680,622,
excluding money market investments.
In determining the range of value for debt instruments,
management and the independent valuation firm generally shadow
rated the investment and then based upon the range of ratings,
determined appropriate yields to maturity for a loan rated as
such. A discounted cash flow analysis was then prepared using
the appropriate yield to maturity as the discount rate, yielding
the ranges. For equity investments, the enterprise value was
determined by applying EBITDA multiples for similar recent
investment sales. For stressed equity investments, a liquidation
analysis was prepared.
The Board of Directors looked at several factors in determining
where within the range to value the asset including: recent
operating and financial trends for the asset, independent
ratings obtained from third parties and comparable multiples for
recent sales of companies within the industry. The composite of
all these analysis, applied to each investment, was a total
valuation of $648,135, excluding money market investments.
Our investments are generally lower middle market companies,
outside of the financial sector, with less than $30,000 of
annual EBITDA. We believe our market has experienced less
volatility than others because we believe there are more buy and
hold investors who own these less liquid investments.
During the six months ended December 31, 2009, there has
been a general improvement in the markets in which we operate
and market rates of interest demanded for middle market loans
have decreased. The fair value is limited on the high side to
the loans par value, plus any prepayment penalties that would be
imposed. Many of the debt investments in this category have not
seen a significant change in value as they were previously
valued at or near par value. In comparison to assets held as of
June 30, 2009, these assets include: American Gilsonite
Company,
35
Biotronic, Castro Cheese Company, Inc., IEC/ARS, Maverick
Healthcare, LLC, Qualitest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Regional
Management Corp., Shearers Foods, Inc., Stryker Energy,
LLC, TriZetto Group and Unitek. Such assets acquired from
Patriot include: Aircraft Fasteners International, LLC,
Boxercraft, Copernicus Group, EXL Acquisition Corp., Fairchild
Industrial Products Co., Hudson Products Holdings, Inc., KTPS,
Label Corp Holdings, Inc., LHC Holdings Corp., Northwestern
Management Services LLC, R-O-M Corporation and Sport Helmets.
Nine debt investments were made to companies that are not
performing in line with budget expectations as of
December 31, 2009 and have seen a diminution of value since
June 30, 2009 (Ajax, Coalbed, Deb Shops, Inc., H&M
Oil & Gas, LLC, Iron Horse, NRG, R-V, Wind River
Resources Corp. and Wind River II Corp. and Yatesville).
The valuation of these assets is further stressed by declining
market demand within their respective industries, primarily
retail, industrial and energy-related. For these assets, we have
increased the market interest rates to take into account the
increased credit risk, illiquidity and general changes in
current interest rates for similar assets to determine their
fair value.
Five portfolio companies (ADAPCO, C&J, Diamondback, Miller
and R-V) are equity investments for which the previously
outstanding debt has been repaid.
Control investments offer increased risk and reward over
straight debt investments. Operating results and changes in
market multiples can result in dramatic changes in values from
quarter to quarter. Significant downturns in operations can
further result in our looking to recoveries on sales of assets
rather than the enterprise value of the investment. Several
control investments in our portfolio are under enhanced scrutiny
by our senior management and our Board of Directors and are
discussed below.
Ajax
Rolled Ring & Machine, Inc.
We acquired a controlling equity interest in Ajax in a
recapitalization of the company that was closed on April 4,
2008. We funded $22,000 of senior secured term debt, $11,500 of
subordinated term debt and $6,300 of equity as of that closing.
As of December 31, 2009, we control 78.1% of the
fully-diluted common and preferred equity.
Ajax forges seamless steel rings sold to various customers. The
rings are used in a range of industrial applications, including
in construction equipment and wind power turbines. Ajaxs
business is cyclical, and the business suffered in light of the
global macroeconomic crisis of the past several quarters. 2008
was relatively strong for Ajax, but in the first half of 2009,
Ajax experienced massive cuts in ordering of steel rings by its
key customers. The second half of 2009 showed steady improvement
versus very weak performance in the first half of the year and
despite improvement in the second half of the year, Ajaxs
overall performance in 2009 was well below that of 2008. At
December 31, 2009, Ajax had a backlog of new business that
would indicate continued improvement through 2010.
The Board of Directors wrote-down the fair value of our
investment in Ajax to $25,802 as of December 31, 2009, a
reduction of $14,059 from its amortized cost, compared to the
$7,581 unrealized loss recorded at June 30, 2009.
Change
Clean Energy Holdings Inc. and Change Clean Energy, Inc., f/k/a
Worcester Energy Partners, Inc.
Change Clean Energy, Inc. (CCEI) is an investment
that we originated in September 2005 which owns and operated a
bio-mass energy plant. In March 2009 CCEI ceased operations
temporarily as it was not economically feasible to make a profit
based on the cost of materials and the price being paid for
electricity. During that quarter, we determined that it was
appropriate to institute foreclosure proceedings against the
co-borrowers of our debt to take full control of the assets. In
anticipation of such proceedings CCEHI was established and on
March 11, 2009, the foreclosure was completed and the
assets were assigned to a wholly owned subsidiary of CCEHI.
During the six months ended December 31, 2009, we provided
additional funding of $296 to CCEHI to fund ongoing operations.
CCEI currently has no material operations. At June 30, 2009
we determined that the impairment at both CCEI and CCEHI was
other than temporary and recognized a realized loss of $41,134,
which was the amount by which the amortized cost exceeded the
fair value. At December 31, 2009, our Board of Directors,
under recommendation from senior management, has set the value
of the CCEHI investment at $1,976, a reduction of $849 from its
amortized cost.
36
Gas
Solutions Holdings, Inc.
GSHI is an investment that we made in September 2004 in which we
own 100% of the equity. GSHI is a midstream gathering and
processing business located in East Texas. GSHI has improved its
operations and we have experienced an increase in revenue, gross
margin, and EBITDA (the later two metrics on both an absolute
and a percentage of revenues basis) over the past five years.
During the past two years, we have been in discussions with
multiple interested purchasers for Gas Solutions. While we wish
to unlock the value in Gas Solutions, we do not wish to enter
into any agreement at any time that does not recognize the long
term value we see in Gas Solutions. As a well hedged midstream
asset, which will generate predictable and consistent cash flows
to us, Gas Solutions is a valuable asset that we wish to sell at
a value-maximizing price, or not at all. We continue discussions
with interested parties, but have a patient approach toward the
process. In addition, a sale of the assets, rather than the
stock of GSHI, might result in a significant tax liability at
the GSHI level which will need to be paid prior to any
distribution to us.
In early May 2008, Gas Solutions II Ltd purchased a series
of propane puts at $0.10 out of the money and at prices of $1.53
per gallon and $1.394 per gallon covering the periods
May 1, 2008, through April 30, 2009, and May 1,
2009, through April 30, 2010, respectively. These hedges
were executed at close to the highest market propane prices ever
achieved on an historical basis; such hedges preserve the upside
of Gas Solutions II Ltd to benefit from potential future
increases in commodity prices. GSHI generated approximately
$26,172 of EBITDA for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2008, an increase of 67% from 2007 results. Despite the
volatility in commodity prices over the last year, GSHI
generated approximately $25,816 of EBITDA for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2009.
In determining the value of GSHI, we have utilized several
valuation techniques to determine the value of the investment.
These techniques offer a wide range of values. Our Board of
Directors has determined the value to be $85,187 for our debt
and equity positions at December 31, 2009 based upon a
combination of a discounted cash flow analysis and a public
comparables analysis. At December 31, 2009 and
June 30, 2009, GSHI was valued $50,184 above its amortized
cost.
Integrated
Contract Services, Inc.
ICS is an investment that we made in April 2007. Prior to
January 2009, ICS owned the assets of ESA Environmental
Specialists, Inc. (ESA) and 100% of the stock of The
Healing Staff (THS). ESA originally defaulted under
our contract governing our investment in ESA, prompting us to
commence foreclosure actions with respect to certain ESA assets
in respect of which we have a priority lien. In response to our
actions, ESA filed voluntarily for reorganization under the
bankruptcy code on August 1, 2007. On September 20,
2007, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved a Section 363
Asset Sale from ESA to us. To complete this transaction, we
contributed our ESA debt to a newly-formed entity, ICS, and
provided funds for working capital on October 9, 2007. In
return for the ESA debt, we received senior secured debt in ICS
of equal amount to our ESA debt, preferred stock of ICS, and 49%
of the ICS common stock. ICS subsequently ceased operations and
assigned the collateral back to us. ICS is in default of both
payment and financial covenants. During September and October
2007, we provided $1,170 to THS for working capital.
In January 2009, we foreclosed on the real and personal property
of ICS. Through this foreclosure process, we gained 100%
ownership of THS and certain ESA assets. Based upon an analysis
of the liquidation value of the ESA assets and the enterprise
value of THS, our Board of Directors affirmed the fair value of
our investment in ICS at $5,275 at December 31, 2009, a
reduction of $11,377 from its amortized cost, compared to the
$11,652 unrealized loss recorded at June 30, 2009.
Iron
Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.
Iron Horse is an investment that we made in April 2006. Iron
Horse had been a provider of coiled tubing subcontractor
services prior to making a strategic decision in late 2007 to
directly service natural gas and oil producers in the Western
Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) as a fracturing
services provider. As a result of the business transition, the
Companys 2008 financial performance declined significantly
from 2007 levels. Iron
37
Horse completed its transition from a subcontractor to a direct
service provider in 2009, but natural gas prices fell to trough
levels due to the recession and heightened natural gas inventory
levels. Since November 2009, Iron Horse has seen increased
activity in the WCSB and is now completing wells for several
large producers in the WCSB.
Prior to December 31, 2007, we owned 8.5% of the common
stock in Iron Horse. On December 31, 2007, we received an
additional 50.3% of the common stock in Iron Horse, which
increased our total ownership to 58.8%. Through a series of
subsequent loans that were used to construct equipment and
facilitate the transition from a subcontractor to a direct
service provider, we secured an additional 21.0% of the common
stock in Iron Horse in September 2008, which increased our total
ownership to 79.8% of the common stock in Iron Horse.
The Board of Directors wrote-down the fair value of our
investment in Iron Horse to $12,318 as of December 31,
2009, a reduction of $8,399 from its amortized cost, compared to
the $6,738 unrealized loss recorded at June 30, 2009.
Yatesville
Coal Holdings, Inc.
All of our coal holdings have been consolidated under common
management in Yatesville. Yatesville began to show improvement
after the consolidation of the coal holdings, but the company
exhausted its permitted reserves in December 2008 and has not
had any meaningful revenue stream since. We continue to evaluate
strategies for Yatesville such as soliciting indications of
interest regarding a transaction involving part or all of
recoverable reserves. During the six months ended
December 31, 2009, we provided additional funding of $3,376
to Yatesville to fund ongoing operations including new
permitting. During the quarter, we discontinued operations at
Yatesville. As of December 31, 2009, our Board of Directors
determined that consistent with the decision to discontinue
operations, the impairment of Yatesville was other than
temporary and we recorded a realized loss of $51,228 which was
the amount that the amortized cost exceeded the fair value at
December 31, 2009. Our Board of Directors set the value of
the remaining Yatesville investment at $1,035, which represents
the residual value of recoverable reserves, as of
December 31, 2009, a reduction of $12,062 from its value as
of June 30, 2009.
Capitalization
Our investment activities are capital intensive and the
availability and cost of capital is a critical component of our
business. We capitalize our business with a combination of debt
and equity. Our debt is currently consists of a revolving credit
facility availing us of the ability to borrow debt subject to
borrowing base determinations and our equity capital is
currently comprised entirely of common equity.
On June 25, 2009, we completed a first closing on an
expanded $250,000 syndicated revolving credit facility (the
Facility). The new Facility, for which six lenders
have closed on $210,000 to date, includes an accordion feature
which allows the Facility to accept up to an aggregate total of
$250,000 of commitments for which we continue to solicit
additional commitments from other lenders for the additional
$40,000. The revolving period of the Facility extends through
June 2010, with an additional one year amortization period after
the completion of the revolving period. As of December 31,
2009 and June 30, 2009, we had $10,000 and $124,800 of
borrowings outstanding under our credit facility, respectively.
Interest on borrowings under the credit facility is one-month
Libor plus 400 basis points, subject to a minimum Libor
floor of 200 basis points after that date. The maintenance
of this facility requires us to pay a fee for the amount not
drawn upon. This fee assessed at the rate of 100 basis
points per annum. The following table shows the facility amounts
and outstanding borrowings at December 31, 2009 and
June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
$
|
195,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
175,000
|
|
|
$
|
124,800
|
|
38
The following table shows the contractual maturity of our
revolving credit facility at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due By Period
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3 Years
|
|
|
Credit Facility Payable
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended December 31, 2009, we completed
public and private offerings and raised $97,675 of additional
equity by issuing 11,431,797 shares of our common stock
below net asset value diluting shareholder value by $0.75 per
share. We also issued 8,444,068 shares to acquire Patriot
increasing net asset value to shareholders by $0.03 per share.
The following table shows the calculation of net asset value per
share as of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
$
|
637,477
|
|
|
$
|
532,596
|
|
Shares of common stock outstanding
|
|
|
63,349,746
|
|
|
|
42,943,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per share
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
12.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009, we had 63,349,746 of our common stock
issued and outstanding.
Results
of Operations
For the three months ended December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, the net (decrease) increase in net
assets resulting from operations was ($16,853) and $6,524,
respectively, representing ($0.29) and $0.22 per share,
respectively. We experienced a net realized and unrealized loss
of $33,778 or approximately $0.59 per share in the three months
ended December 31, 2009. This compares with the net
realized and unrealized loss of $5,436 during the three months
ended December 31, 2008 or approximately $0.18 per share.
For the six months ended December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, the net (decrease) increase in net
assets resulting from operations was ($23,231) and $20,522,
respectively, representing ($0.43) and $0.69 per share,
respectively. We experienced a net realized and unrealized loss
of $52,474 or approximately $0.98 per share in the six months
ended December 31, 2009. This compares with the net
realized and unrealized loss of $14,940 during the six months
ended December 31, 2008 or approximately $0.51 per share.
While we seek to maximize gains and minimize losses, our
investments in portfolio companies can expose our capital to
risks greater than those we may anticipate as these companies
are typically not issuing securities rated investment grade,
have limited resources, have limited operating history, are
generally private companies with limited operating information
available and are likely to depend on a small core of management
talents. Changes in any of these factors can have a significant
impact on the value of the portfolio company.
Investment
Income
We generate revenue in the form of interest income on the debt
securities that we own, dividend income on any common or
preferred stock that we own, and amortized loan origination fees
on the structuring of new deals. Our investments, if in the form
of debt securities, will typically have a term of one to ten
years and bear interest at a fixed or floating rate. To the
extent achievable, we will seek to collateralize our investments
by obtaining security interests in our portfolio companies
assets. We also may acquire minority or majority equity
interests in our portfolio companies, which may pay cash or
in-kind dividends on a recurring or otherwise negotiated basis.
In addition, we may generate revenue in other forms including
prepayment penalties and possibly consulting fees. Any such fees
generated in connection with our investments are recognized as
earned.
Investment income consists of interest income, including
accretion of loan origination fees and prepayment penalty fees,
dividend income and other income, including net profits
interest, overriding royalties interest and
39
structuring fees. The following table details the various
components of investment income and the related levels of debt
investments for the three months ended December 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
18,539
|
|
|
$
|
17,241
|
|
|
$
|
33,374
|
|
|
$
|
34,797
|
|
Dividend income
|
|
|
4,170
|
|
|
|
4,665
|
|
|
|
10,388
|
|
|
|
9,388
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
6,174
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
6,638
|
|
|
|
13,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
$
|
28,883
|
|
|
$
|
22,213
|
|
|
$
|
50,400
|
|
|
$
|
58,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average debt principal of investments
|
|
$
|
571,809
|
|
|
$
|
537,101
|
|
|
$
|
535,069
|
|
|
$
|
517,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average interest rate earned
|
|
|
12.86
|
%
|
|
|
12.74
|
%
|
|
|
12.37
|
%
|
|
|
13.34
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income increased significantly from $22,213 for
the three months ended December 31, 2008 to $28,883 for the
six months ended December 31, 2009. This $6,670 increase is
primarily due to the Patriot acquisition, for which we
recognized a gain from the acquisition of $5,714 and purchase
discount accretion of $5,320 during the three months ended
December 31, 2009. The discount accretion includes $4,560
of accelerated accretion from early repayments of ADAPCO,
Quartermaster and Aylward. Total investment income has decreased
for the six months ended December 31, 2009 from the amount
reported for the six months ended December 31, 2008
primarily due to a decrease in other income. This $7,189
decrease in other income is primarily due to the settlement of
our net profit interests in IEC/ARS for $12,576 during the six
months ended December 31, 2008, partially offset but gain
from the acquisition of Patriot.
Average principal balances of debt investments have increased
from $537,101 for the three months ended December 31, 2008
to $571,809 for the three months ended December 31, 2009.
For the six months ended December 31, 2008 and 2009,
average principal balances of debt investments increased from
$517,421 to $535,069, respectively. These increases are
primarily due to the Patriot acquisition which resulted in an
additional $289,030 of debt principal to our portfolio.
The weighted-average interest rate earned increased from 12.74%
for the three months ended December 31, 2008 to 12.86% for
the three months ended December 31, 2009. This increase is
primarily the result of purchase discount accretion of $5,320
from the Patriot acquisition. For the six months ended
December 31, 2008 and 2009, weighted-average interest rate
earned decreased from 13.34% to 12.37%, respectively. This
decrease is primarily the result of Patriot acquisition purchase
discount accretion, offset by foregone interest on non-accrual
loans. During the six month period ended December 31, 2009,
interest of $12,510 was foregone on non-accrual debt investments
compared to $4,983 of forgone interest for the three months
ended December 31, 2008. Without adjustments for foregone
interest and purchase discount accretion from the Patriot
acquisition, the weighted average interest rates earned on debt
investments would have been 15.0% and 15.3% for the three months
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Operating
Expenses
Our primary operating expenses consist of investment advisory
fees (base management and income incentive fees), credit
facility costs, legal and professional fees and other operating
and overhead-related expenses. These expenses include our
allocable portion of overhead under the Administration Agreement
with Prospect Administration under which Prospect Administration
provides administrative services and facilities for us. Our
investment advisory fees compensate our Investment Adviser for
its work in identifying, evaluating, negotiating, closing and
monitoring our investments. We bear all other costs and expenses
of our operations and transactions in accordance with our
Administration Agreement with Prospect Administration. Operating
expenses were $11,958 and $10,253 for the three months ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Operating expenses were $21,157 and $22,550 for the six months
ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively.
40
The base management fee was $3,176 and $2,940 for the three
months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. The base management fee was $6,385 and $5,763 for
the six months ended December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. The increase in this
expense for the three and six months ended December 31,
2009 is directly related to our growth in total assets.
For the three months ended December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, we incurred $4,231 and $2,990,
respectively, of income incentive fees. The $1,241 increase in
the income incentive fee for the respective three-month period
is driven by an increase in pre-incentive fee net investment
income from $14,950 for the three months ended December 31,
2008 to $21,156 for the three months ended December 31,
2009, primarily the result of additional investment income from
the Patriot acquisition. For the six months ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we incurred
$7,311 and $8,865, respectively, of income incentive fees. The
$1,554 decrease in the income incentive fee for the respective
six-month period is driven by a decrease in pre-incentive fee
net investment income from $44,327 for the six months ended
December 31, 2008 to $36,554 for the six months ended
December 31, 2009, primarily the result of the settlement
of net profits interest in IEC/ARS in the 2008 period offset by
the income from the Patriot acquisition. No capital gains
incentive fee has yet been incurred pursuant to the Investment
Advisory Agreement.
During the three and six months ended December 31, 2009, we
incurred $1,995 and $3,369 of expenses related to our credit
facility. This compares with expenses of $1,965 and $3,483
incurred during the three and six months ended December 31,
2008. These expenses are related directly to the leveraging
capacity put into place for each of those periods and the levels
of indebtedness actually undertaken during those quarters. The
table below describes the various credit facility expenses and
the related indicators of leveraging capacity and indebtedness
during these periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Interest on borrowings
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
1,712
|
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
|
$
|
2,942
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
Commitment and other fees
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,995
|
|
|
$
|
1,965
|
|
|
$
|
3,369
|
|
|
$
|
3,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average debt outstanding
|
|
$
|
17,609
|
|
|
$
|
137,525
|
|
|
$
|
13,003
|
|
|
$
|
125,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average interest rate on borrowings
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.94
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.64
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility amount at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
195,000
|
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
195,000
|
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in our interest rate incurred is primarily due to
an increase of 150 basis points in our current borrowing
rate effective June 25, 2009.
As our asset base has grown and we have added complexity to our
capital raising activities, due, in part, to our assumption of
the
sub-administration
role from Vastardis, we have commensurately increased the size
of our administrative and financial staff, accounting for a
significant increase in the overhead allocation from Prospect
Administration. Over the last year, Prospect Administration has
added several additional staff members, including a senior
finance professional, a controller, two corporate counsels and
other finance professionals. As our portfolio continues to grow,
we expect to continue to increase the size of our administrative
and financial staff on a basis that provides increasing returns
to scale. However, initial investments in administrative and
financial staff may not provide returns to scale immediately,
perhaps not until the portfolio increases to a greater size.
Other allocated expenses from Prospect Administration have, as
expected, increased alongside with the increase in staffing and
asset base.
Legal costs increased from $184 for the three months ended
December 31, 2008 to $390 for the three months ended
December 31, 2009 primarily due to the increased size of
our portfolio. Legal costs decreased from $483 for the six
months ended December 31, 2008 to $390 for the six months
ended December 31, 2009 as there were legal matters in the
prior year that are no longer active.
41
Net
Investment Income, Net Realized (Loss) Gains, (Decrease)
Increase in Net Assets from Net Change in Unrealized
Depreciation/Appreciation and Net (Decrease) Increase in Net
Assets Resulting from Operations
Net investment income was $16,925 and $11,960 for the three
months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. This $4,965 increase was due primarily to the
Patriot acquisition, for we recognized a gain from the
acquisition and purchase discount accretion, partially offset by
increased advisory fees and forgone interest related to Iron
Horse. Net investment income was $29,243 and $35,462 for the six
months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. This $6,219 decrease is due primarily to the
settlement of our net profit interests in IEC/ARS during the six
months ended December 31, 2008, offset by the Patriot
acquisition, increased advisory fees and forgone interest
related to Iron Horse for the six months ended December 31,
2009.
Net realized (loss) gains were ($51,229) and $16 for the three
months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. Net realized (loss) gains were ($51,229) and
$1,661 for the six months ended December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. The net realized loss of
$51,229 for the three and six months ended December 31,
2009 was due primarily to the impairment of Yatesville. See
Investment Valuations for further discussion.
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from changes in unrealized
appreciation/depreciation was $17,451 and ($5,452) for the three
months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. For the three months ended December 31, 2009,
the $17,451 increase in net assets from the net change in
unrealized appreciation/depreciation was driven primarily by our
impairment of Yatesville which resulted in $40,856 being
reversed out of unrealized, partially offset by write-downs of
our investments in Ajax, H&M, NRG and R-V. For the three
months ended December 31, 2008, the $5,452 decrease in net
assets from the net change in unrealized
appreciation/depreciation was driven primarily by write-downs to
our investments in Deb Shops, Iron Horse, Qualitest, RMC, Resco,
WEPI, and Yatesville which were partially offset by unrealized
appreciation of our investment in GSHI.
Net decrease in net assets from changes in unrealized
appreciation/depreciation was $1,245 and $16,601 for the six
months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. The $1,245 decrease occurring during the six
months ended December 31, 2009 was primarily attributable
to unrealized depreciation recognized for our investments in
Ajax, Coalbed, Deb Shops, H&M, NRG, and R-V partially
offset by the impairment of our investment in Yatesville of
$51,228. The $16,601 decrease occurring during the six months
ended December 31, 2008 was attributable to unrealized
depreciation recognized for our investments in Deb Shops, Iron
Horse, Qualitest, RMC, Resco, WEPI, and Yatesville partially
offset by a
write-up of
our investment in GSHI.
Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
For the six months ended December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, our operating activities provided (used)
$155,128 and ($23,126) of cash, respectively. Investing
activities for the Patriot acquisition used $106,586 and zero
for the six months ended December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. Financing activities
provided $54,640 and $25,009 of cash during the six months ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively,
which included the payments of dividends of $36,469 and $22,221,
during the six months ended December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively.
Our primary uses of funds have been to continue to invest in our
investments in portfolio companies, to add new companies to our
investment portfolio, acquire Patriot, repay outstanding
borrowings and to make cash distributions to holders of our
common stock.
We have and may continue to fund a portion of our cash needs
through borrowings from banks, issuances of senior securities or
secondary offerings. We may also securitize a portion of our
investments in mezzanine or senior secured loans or other
assets. Our objective is to put in place such borrowings in
order to enable us to expand our portfolio. At December 31,
2009, we had $10,000 outstanding borrowings on our $195,000
revolving credit facility. Subsequent to December 31, 2009,
we completed a closing for an additional $15,000 commitment to
the revolving credit facility, increasing total commitments to
$210,000.
42
On September 6, 2007, our Registration Statement on
Form N-2
was declared effective by the SEC. At December 31, 2009,
under the Registration Statement, we had remaining availability
to issue up to approximately $147,500 of our equity securities
over the next eight months.
We also continue to generate liquidity through public and
private stock offerings. On July 7, 2009 we completed a
public stock offering for 5,175,000 shares of our common
stock at $9.00 per share, raising $46,575 of gross proceeds. On
August 20, 2009 and September 24, 2009, we issued
3,449,686 shares and 2,807,111 shares, respectively,
of our common stock at $8.50 and $9.00 per share, respectively,
in private stock offerings, raising $29,322, and $25,264 of
gross proceeds, respectively. Concurrent with the sale of these
shares, we entered into a registration rights agreement in which
we granted the purchasers certain registration rights with
respect to the shares. Under the terms and conditions of the
registration rights agreement, we filed with the SEC a
post-effective amendment to the registration statement on
Form N-2
on November 6, 2009. Such amendment was declared effective
by the SEC on November 9, 2009.
On December 2, 2009 we acquired the outstanding shares of
Patriot common stock for approximately $201,083. Under the terms
of the merger agreement, Patriot common shareholders received
0.363992 shares of our common stock for each share of
Patriot common stock, resulting in 8,444,068 shares of
common stock being issued by us. In connection with the
transaction, we repaid all the outstanding borrowings of
Patriot, in compliance with the merger agreement.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
At December 31, 2009, we did not have any off-balance sheet
liabilities or other contractual obligations that are reasonably
likely to have a current or future material effect on our
financial condition, other than those which originate from
1) the investment advisory and management agreement and the
administration agreement and 2) the portfolio companies.
Developments
Since the End of the Fiscal Quarter
On January 25, 2010, we issued 236,985 shares of our
common stock in connection with the dividend reinvestment plan.
On January 4, 2010, we completed a closing for an
additional $15,000 commitment to the Facility, increasing total
commitments to $210,000.
Merger
Discussions with Allied Capital Corporation
On January 14, 2010, Prospect Capital delivered a proposal
letter to the Allied Capital Board (the First Prospect
Capital Merger Offer Letter) containing an offer to
acquire each outstanding Allied Capital Corporation
(Allied Capital) Share in exchange for 0.385 of a
share of Prospect Capital Common Stock (the First Prospect
Capital Merger Offer).
On January 19, 2010, Allied Capital filed a
Form 8-K
stating that the Allied Capital Board determined that the First
Prospect Capital Merger Offer did not constitute a
Superior Proposal as such term is defined in the
Ares Capital Merger Agreement.
On January 20, 2010, Prospect Capital issued a press
release containing a copy of a letter it subsequently sent to
the Allied Capital Board in connection with the First Prospect
Capital Merger Offer.
On January 26, 2010, Prospect Capital announced that it
delivered another letter to the Allied Capital Board, raising
its offer to acquire Allied Capital (the Second Prospect
Capital Merger Offer Letter).
43
On February 3, 2010, Allied Capital informed us and filed a
Form 8-K
stating that the Allied Capital Board determined that the Second
Prospect Capital Merger Offer did not constitute a
Superior Proposal as such term is defined in the
Ares Capital Merger Agreement.
On February 9, 2010, Prospect Capital announced that it
delivered another letter to the Allied Capital Board, raising
its offer to acquire Allied Capital (the Third Prospect
Capital Merger Offer Letter).
On February 11, 2010, Allied Capital informed us and filed
a
Form 8-K
stating that the Allied Capital Board determined that the Third
Prospect Capital Merger Offer did not constitute a
Superior Proposal as such term is defined in the
Ares Capital Merger Agreement. Prospect Capital has filed proxy
materials to solicit Allied Shareholders to vote against
Allieds proposed merger with Ares Capital Corporation. A
merger with Allied would be material to Prospect Capital and its
shareholders. If Prospect Capital were to negotiate a merger
agreement with Allied, Prospect Capital would provide extensive
disclosure to its shareholders regarding the terms and
conditions of and risks regarding such transaction.
44
REPORT OF
MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL
REPORTING
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, and for
performing an assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009.
Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. The Companys internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that
(i) pertain to assets of the Company; (ii) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary
to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of management and directors of the Company;
and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the Companys assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Management performed an assessment of the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
June 30, 2009 based upon criteria in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Based on our assessment, management
determined that the Companys internal control over
financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2009 based
on the criteria on Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by COSO. There were no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting during the quarter ended
June 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
Our managements assessment of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of June 30,
2009 has been audited by BDO Seidman LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report
which appears in the
10-K.
USE OF
PROCEEDS
Unless otherwise specified in a prospectus supplement, we intend
to use the net proceeds from selling Securities pursuant to this
prospectus initially to maintain balance sheet liquidity,
involving repayment of debt under our credit facility,
investments in high quality short-term debt instruments or a
combination thereof, and thereafter to make long-term
investments in accordance with our investment objective. A
supplement to this prospectus relating to each offering will
provide additional detail, to the extent known at the time,
regarding the use of the proceeds from such offering including
any intention to utilize proceeds to pay expenses in order to
avoid sales of long-term assets.
We anticipate that substantially all of the net proceeds of an
offering of Securities pursuant to this prospectus will be used
for the above purposes within six months, depending on the
availability of appropriate investment opportunities consistent
with our investment objective and market conditions. In
addition, we expect that there will be several offerings
pursuant to this prospectus; we expect that substantially all of
the proceeds from all offerings will be used within three years.
Pending our new investments, we plan to invest a portion of net
proceeds in cash equivalents, U.S. government securities
and other high-quality debt investments that mature in one year
or less from the date of investment and other general corporate
purposes. The management fee payable by us will not be reduced
while our assets are invested in such securities. See
Regulation Temporary Investments for
additional information about temporary investments we may make
while waiting to make longer-term investments in pursuit of our
investment objective.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Our annual report on Form l0-K for the year ended June 30,
2009, any of our quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
or current reports on
Form 8-K,
or any other oral or written statements made in press releases
or otherwise by or on behalf of Prospect Capital Corporation
including this prospectus may contain forward looking statements
within the meaning of the Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which involve substantial
risks and uncertainties. Forward looking statements predict or
describe our future operations, business plans, business and
investment strategies and portfolio management and the
performance of our investments and our investment
45
management business. These forward-looking statements are not
historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations,
estimates and projections about our industry, our beliefs, and
our assumptions. Words such as intends,
intend, intended, goal,
estimate, estimates,
expects, expect, expected,
project, projected,
projections, plans, seeks,
anticipates, anticipated,
should, could, may,
will, designed to, foreseeable
future, believe, believes and
scheduled and variations of these words and similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
Our actual results or outcomes may differ materially from those
anticipated. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance
on these forward looking statements, which speak only as of the
date the statement was made. We undertake no obligation to
publicly update or revise any forward looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise. These forward-looking statements do not meet the safe
harbor for forward-looking statements pursuant to
Section 27A of the Securities Act. These statements are not
guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks,
uncertainties, and other factors, some of which are beyond our
control and difficult to predict and could cause actual results
to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the
forward-looking statements, including without limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
our future operating results,
|
|
|
|
our business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio
companies,
|
|
|
|
the impact of investments that we expect to make,
|
|
|
|
the dependence of our future success on the general economy and
its impact on the industries in which we invest,
|
|
|
|
the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their
objectives,
|
|
|
|
difficulty in obtaining financing or raising capital, especially
in the current credit and equity environment,
|
|
|
|
the level and volatility of prevailing interest rates and credit
spreads, magnified by the current turmoil in the credit markets,
|
|
|
|
adverse developments in the availability of desirable loan and
investment opportunities whether they are due to competition,
regulation or otherwise,
|
|
|
|
a compression of the yield on our investments and the cost of
our liabilities, as well as the level of leverage available to
us,
|
|
|
|
our regulatory structure and tax treatment, including our
ability to operate as a business development company and a
regulated investment company;
|
|
|
|
the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital;
|
|
|
|
the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our
portfolio companies;
|
|
|
|
the ability of our investment adviser to locate suitable
investments for us and to monitor and administer our investments,
|
|
|
|
authoritative generally accepted accounting principles or policy
changes from such standard-setting bodies as the Financial
Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Internal Revenue Service, the New York Stock
Exchange, and other authorities that we are subject to, as well
as their counterparts in any foreign jurisdictions where we
might do business; and
|
|
|
|
the risks, uncertainties and other factors we identify in
Risk Factors and elsewhere in this prospectus and in
our filings with the SEC.
|
Although we believe that the assumptions on which these
forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of
those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result,
the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also
could be inaccurate. Important assumptions include our ability
to originate new loans and investments, certain margins and
levels of profitability and the availability of additional
capital. In light of these and other uncertainties, the
inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this
prospectus should not be regarded as a representation by us that
our plans and objectives will be achieved. These risks and
uncertainties include those described or identified in
Risk Factors and elsewhere in this prospectus. You
should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which apply only as of the date of this prospectus.
46
DISTRIBUTIONS
We have paid and intend to continue to distribute quarterly
distributions to our stockholders out of assets legally
available for distribution. Our distributions, if any, will be
determined by our Board of Directors. Certain amounts of the
quarterly distributions may from time to time be paid out of our
capital rather than from earnings for the quarter as a result of
our deliberate planning or by accounting reclassifications.
In order to maintain RIC tax treatment, we must distribute at
least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term
capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital
losses, if any, out of the assets legally available for
distribution. In order to avoid certain excise taxes imposed on
RICs, we are required to distribute with respect to each
calendar year by January 31 of the following year an amount at
least equal to the sum of
|
|
|
|
|
98% of our ordinary income for the calendar year,
|
|
|
|
98% of our capital gains in excess of capital losses for the
one-year period ending on October 31 of the calendar
year, and
|
|
|
|
any ordinary income and net capital gains for preceding years
that were not distributed during such years.
|
In December 2008, our Board of Directors elected to retain
excess profits generated in the quarter ended September 30,
2008 and pay a 4% excise tax on such retained earnings. This tax
of $533,000 was paid in the quarter ending March 31, 2009.
In addition, although we currently intend to distribute realized
net capital gains (which we define as net long-term capital
gains in excess of short-term capital losses), if any, at least
annually, out of the assets legally available for such
distributions, we may decide in the future to retain such
capital gains for investment. In such event, the consequences of
our retention of net capital gains are as described under
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Considerations. We can offer no assurance that we will
achieve results that will permit the payment of any cash
distributions and, if we issue senior securities, we may be
prohibited from making distributions if doing so causes us to
fail to maintain the asset coverage ratios stipulated by the
1940 Act or if distributions are limited by the terms of any of
our borrowings.
We maintain an opt out dividend reinvestment plan
for our common stockholders. As a result, if we declare a
dividend, then stockholders cash dividends will be
automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common
stock, unless they specifically opt out of the
dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash dividends. See
Dividend Reinvestment Plan. To the extent prudent
and practicable, we intend to declare and pay dividends on a
quarterly basis.
With respect to the dividends paid to stockholders, income from
origination, structuring, closing, commitment and other upfront
fees associated with investments in portfolio companies were
treated as taxable income and accordingly, distributed to
stockholders. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, we
declared total dividends of approximately $56.1 million.
For the first and second quarters of the fiscal year ending
June 30, 2010, we paid total distributions of approximately
$22.3 million and $25.9 million, respectively.
Tax characteristics of all distributions will be reported to
stockholders, as appropriate, on
Form 1099-DIV
after the end of the year. Our ability to pay distributions
could be affected by future business performance, liquidity,
capital needs, alternative investment opportunities and loan
covenants.
47
The following table lists the quarterly distributions per share
since shares of our common stock began being regularly quoted on
The NASDAQ Global Select Market:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Declared
|
|
Record Date
|
|
|
Payment Date
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
11/11/2004
|
|
|
12/10/2004
|
|
|
|
12/30/2004
|
|
|
$
|
0.100
|
|
|
$
|
705,510
|
|
2/9/2005
|
|
|
3/11/2005
|
|
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
|
$
|
0.125
|
|
|
$
|
881,888
|
|
4/21/2005
|
|
|
6/10/2005
|
|
|
|
6/30/2005
|
|
|
$
|
0.150
|
|
|
$
|
1,058,265
|
|
9/15/2005
|
|
|
9/22/2005
|
|
|
|
9/29/2005
|
|
|
$
|
0.200
|
|
|
$
|
1,411,020
|
|
12/12/2005
|
|
|
12/22/2005
|
|
|
|
12/29/2005
|
|
|
$
|
0.280
|
|
|
$
|
1,975,428
|
|
3/15/2006
|
|
|
3/24/2006
|
|
|
|
3/31/2006
|
|
|
$
|
0.300
|
|
|
$
|
2,116,530
|
|
6/14/2006
|
|
|
6/23/2006
|
|
|
|
6/30/2006
|
|
|
$
|
0.340
|
|
|
$
|
2,401,060
|
|
7/31/2006
|
|
|
9/22/2006
|
|
|
|
9/29/2006
|
|
|
$
|
0.380
|
|
|
$
|
4,858,879
|
|
12/15/2006
|
|
|
12/29/2006
|
|
|
|
1/5/2007
|
|
|
$
|
0.385
|
|
|
$
|
7,263,926
|
|
3/14/2007
|
|
|
3/23/2007
|
|
|
|
3/30/2007
|
|
|
$
|
0.3875
|
|
|
$
|
7,666,837
|
|
6/14/2007
|
|
|
6/22/2007
|
|
|
|
6/29/2007
|
|
|
$
|
0.390
|
|
|
$
|
7,752,900
|
|
9/6/2007
|
|
|
9/19/2007
|
|
|
|
9/28/2007
|
|
|
$
|
0.3925
|
|
|
$
|
7,830,008
|
|
12/18/2007
|
|
|
12/28/2007
|
|
|
|
1/7/2008
|
|
|
$
|
0.395
|
|
|
$
|
9,369,850
|
|
3/6/2008
|
|
|
3/31/2008
|
|
|
|
4/16/2008
|
|
|
$
|
0.400
|
|
|
$
|
10,468,455
|
|
6/19/2008
|
|
|
6/30/2008
|
|
|
|
7/16/2008
|
|
|
$
|
0.40125
|
|
|
$
|
11,845,052
|
|
9/16/2008
|
|
|
9/30/2008
|
|
|
|
10/16/2008
|
|
|
$
|
0.4025
|
|
|
$
|
11,881,953
|
|
12/19/2008
|
|
|
12/31/2008
|
|
|
|
1/19/2009
|
|
|
$
|
0.40375
|
|
|
$
|
11,966,313
|
|
3/24/2009
|
|
|
3/31/2009
|
|
|
|
4/20/2009
|
|
|
$
|
0.405
|
|
|
$
|
12,670,882
|
|
6/23/2009
|
|
|
7/8/2009
|
|
|
|
7/20/2009
|
|
|
$
|
0.40625
|
|
|
$
|
19,547,972
|
|
9/28/2009
|
|
|
10/8/2009
|
|
|
|
10/19/2009
|
|
|
$
|
0.4075
|
|
|
$
|
22,278,903
|
|
12/17/2009
|
|
|
12/31/2009
|
|
|
|
1/25/2010
|
|
|
$
|
0.40875
|
|
|
$
|
25,894,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
181,845,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
SENIOR
SECURITIES
Information about our senior securities is shown in the
following table as of each fiscal year ended June 30 since the
Company commenced operations and as of December 31, 2009,
unless otherwise noted. The report of our independent registered
public accounting firm on the senior securities table as of
June 30, 2009 is attached as an exhibit to the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a part.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
Liquidating
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Total Amount
|
|
|
Coverage per
|
|
|
Preference
|
|
|
Per
|
|
Class and Year
|
|
Outstanding(1)
|
|
|
Unit(2)
|
|
|
Per Unit(3)
|
|
|
Unit(4)
|
|
|
Credit Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 (as of December 31, 2009, unaudited)
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
64,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 (as of June 30, 2009)
|
|
|
124,800
|
|
|
|
5,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008 (as of June 30, 2008)
|
|
|
91,167
|
|
|
|
5,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007 (as of June 30, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006 (as of June 30, 2006)
|
|
|
28,500
|
|
|
|
4,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2005 (as of June 30, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2004 (as of June 30, 2004)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total amount of each class of senior securities outstanding at
the end of the period presented (in 000s). |
|
(2) |
|
The asset coverage ratio for a class of senior securities
representing indebtedness is calculated as our consolidated
total assets, less all liabilities and indebtedness not
represented by senior securities, divided by senior securities
representing indebtedness. This asset coverage ratio is
multiplied by $1,000 to determine the Asset Coverage Per Unit. |
|
(3) |
|
This column is inapplicable because we have had only bank debt
outstanding during the time periods. |
|
(4) |
|
This column is inapplicable because we have not had any
preferred stock outstanding during any of the time periods. |
49
PRICE
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
Our common stock is quoted on The NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol PSEC. The following table sets
forth, for the periods indicated, our net asset value per share
of common stock and the high and low sales prices per share of
our common stock as reported on The NASDAQ Global Select Market.
Our common stock historically trades at prices both above and
below its NAV. There can be no assurance, however, that such
premium or discount, as applicable, to NAV will be maintained.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Discount) of
|
|
|
(Discount) of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Price
|
|
|
High to
|
|
|
Low to
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
|
NAV(1)
|
|
|
High(2)
|
|
|
Low(2)
|
|
|
NAV
|
|
|
NAV
|
|
|
Declared
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ending June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
13.67
|
|
|
$
|
15.45
|
|
|
$
|
14.42
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
13.74
|
|
|
|
15.15
|
|
|
|
11.63
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.100
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
13.74
|
|
|
|
13.72
|
|
|
|
10.61
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(22.8
|
)%
|
|
|
0.125
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
14.59
|
|
|
|
13.47
|
|
|
|
12.27
|
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(15.9
|
)%
|
|
|
0.150
|
|
Twelve Months Ending June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
14.60
|
|
|
$
|
13.60
|
|
|
$
|
11.06
|
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(24.2
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.200
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
14.69
|
|
|
|
15.46
|
|
|
|
12.84
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
(12.6
|
)%
|
|
|
0.280
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
14.81
|
|
|
|
16.64
|
|
|
|
15.00
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.300
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
15.31
|
|
|
|
17.07
|
|
|
|
15.83
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.340
|
|
Twelve Months Ending June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
14.86
|
|
|
$
|
16.77
|
|
|
$
|
15.30
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.380
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
15.24
|
|
|
|
18.79
|
|
|
|
15.60
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.385
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
15.18
|
|
|
|
17.68
|
|
|
|
16.40
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.3875
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
15.04
|
|
|
|
18.68
|
|
|
|
16.91
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
%
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.390
|
|
Twelve Months Ending June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
15.08
|
|
|
$
|
18.68
|
|
|
$
|
14.16
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
%
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.3925
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
14.58
|
|
|
|
17.17
|
|
|
|
11.22
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
(23.0
|
)%
|
|
|
0.395
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
14.15
|
|
|
|
16.00
|
|
|
|
13.55
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
|
|
0.400
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
14.55
|
|
|
|
16.12
|
|
|
|
13.18
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)%
|
|
|
0.40125
|
|
Twelve Months Ending June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
14.63
|
|
|
$
|
14.24
|
|
|
$
|
11.12
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(24.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.4025
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
14.43
|
|
|
|
13.08
|
|
|
|
6.29
|
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(56.4
|
)%
|
|
|
0.40375
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
14.19
|
|
|
|
12.89
|
|
|
|
6.38
|
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(55.0
|
)%
|
|
|
0.405
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
12.40
|
|
|
|
10.48
|
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
|
|
(15.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(35.9
|
)%
|
|
|
0.40625
|
|
Twelve Months Ending June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
11.11
|
|
|
$
|
10.99
|
|
|
$
|
8.82
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(20.6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.4075
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
12.31
|
|
|
|
9.93
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
%
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
|
|
0.40875
|
|
Third quarter (to 2/25/10)
|
|
|
(3
|
)(4)
|
|
|
13.20
|
|
|
|
10.45
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net asset value per share is determined as of the last day in
the relevant quarter and therefore may not reflect the net asset
value per share on the date of the high or low sales price. The
NAVs shown are based on outstanding shares at the end of each
period. |
|
(2) |
|
The High/Low Stock Price is calculated as of the closing price
on a given day in the applicable quarter. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Our most recently determined NAV per share was $10.06 as of
December 31, 2009 ($10.07 on an as adjusted basis solely to
give effect to our issuance of common stock on January 25,
2010 in connection with our dividend reinvestment plan). NAV as
of March 31, 2010 may be higher or lower than $10.07
based on potential changes in valuations as of March 31,
2010. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
NAV has not yet been finally determined for any day after
December 31, 2009. |
|
(5) |
|
The dividend for the third quarter of 2010 will be declared in
March 2010. |
On February 25, 2010, the last reported sales price of our
common stock was $11.66 per share. As of February 25, 2010,
we had approximately 69 stockholders of record.
50
BUSINESS
General
We are a financial services company that primarily lends to and
invests in middle market privately-held companies. We are a
closed-end investment company that has filed an election to be
treated as a business development company under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, or the 1940 Act. We invest primarily in
senior and subordinated debt and equity of companies in need of
capital for acquisitions, divestitures, growth, development,
project financing and recapitalization. We work with the
management teams or financial sponsors to seek investments with
historical cash flows, asset collateral or contracted pro-forma
cash flows.
On July 27, 2004, we completed our initial public offering,
or IPO, and sold 7 million shares of common stock at a
price of $15.00 per share, less underwriting discounts and
commissions totaling $1.05 per share. An additional
55,000 shares were issued through the exercise of an
over-allotment option with respect to the IPO on August 27,
2004. Since the IPO and the exercise of the related
over-allotment option, we have made eleven other share offerings
and six related over-allotment options resulting in the issuance
of 43,493,836 shares at prices ranging from $7.75 to
$17.70. The most recent offering was completed on
September 24, 2009 pursuant to which the Company sold
2,807,111 at an unregistered direct price of $9.00 per share.
On December 2, 2009, we completed our previously announced
acquisition of Patriot under the Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of August 3, 2009, by and among, us and Patriot.
Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, we acquired
Patriot for approximately $200 million comprised of our
common stock and cash to repay all of Patriots outstanding
debt, which amounted to $107.3 million. In the merger, each
outstanding share of Patriot common stock was converted into the
right to receive 0.363992 shares of common stock of
Prospect, representing 8,444,068 shares of the
Companys common stock, and the payment of cash in lieu of
fractional shares of Prospect common stock of less than $200
resulting from the application of the foregoing exchange ratio.
Our headquarters are located at 10 East 40th Street,
44th Floor, New York, NY 10016, and our telephone number is
(212) 448-0702.
Our investment adviser is Prospect Capital Management LLC.
Our
Investment Objective and Policies
Our investment objective is to generate both current income and
long-term capital appreciation through debt and equity
investments. We focus on making investments in private
companies, and many of our investments are in energy companies.
We are a non-diversified company within the meaning of the 1940
Act.
Typically, we concentrate on making investments in companies
with annual revenues of less than $500 million and
enterprise values of less than $250 million. Our typical
investment involves a secured loan of less than $50 million
with some form of equity participation. From time to time, we
acquire controlling interests in companies in conjunction with
making secured debt investments in such companies. In most
cases, companies in which we invest are privately held at the
time we invest in them. We refer to these companies as
target or middle market companies and
these investments as middle market investments.
We seek to maximize returns and protect risk for our investors
by applying rigorous analysis to make and monitor our
investments. While the structure of our investments varies, we
can invest in senior secured debt, senior unsecured debt,
subordinated secured debt, subordinated unsecured debt,
mezzanine debt, convertible debt, convertible preferred equity,
preferred equity, common equity, warrants and other instruments,
many of which generate current yield. Our investments primarily
range between approximately $5 million and $50 million
each, although this investment size may vary as the size of our
capital base changes.
While our primary focus is to seek current income through
investment in the debt
and/or
dividend-paying equity securities of eligible privately-held,
thinly-traded or distressed companies and long-term capital
appreciation by acquiring accompanying warrants, options or
other equity securities of such companies, we may invest up to
30% of the portfolio in opportunistic investments in order to
seek enhanced returns for stockholders. Such investments may
include investments in the debt and equity instruments of
broadly-traded public companies. We expect that these public
companies generally will have debt securities that are
non-investment grade. Within this 30% basket, we may also invest
in debt and equity securities of companies located outside of
the United States.
51
Our investments may include other equity investments, such as
warrants, options to buy a minority interest in a portfolio
company, or contractual payment rights or rights to receive a
proportional interest in the operating cash flow or net income
of such company. When determined by our Investment Adviser to be
in our best interest, we may acquire a controlling interest in a
portfolio company. Any warrants we receive with our debt
securities may require only a nominal cost to exercise, and
thus, as a portfolio company appreciates in value, we may
achieve additional investment return from this equity interest.
We have structured, and will continue to structure, some
warrants to include provisions protecting our rights as a
minority-interest or, if applicable, controlling-interest
holder, as well as puts, or rights to sell such securities back
to the company, upon the occurrence of specified events. In many
cases, we obtain registration rights in connection with these
equity interests, which may include demand and
piggyback registration rights.
We plan to hold many of our investments to maturity or
repayment, but will sell our investments earlier if a liquidity
event takes place, such as the sale or recapitalization of a
portfolio company, or if we determine a sale of one or more of
our investments to be in our best interest.
We have qualified and elected to be treated for
U.S. Federal income tax purposes as a Registered Investment
Company (RIC) under Subchapter M of the Code. As a
RIC, we generally do not have to pay
corporate-level U.S. Federal income taxes on any
ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute to our
stockholders as dividends. To continue to qualify as a RIC, we
must, among other things, meet certain
source-of-income
and asset diversification requirements (as described below). In
addition, to qualify for RIC tax treatment we must distribute to
our stockholders, for each taxable year, at least 90% of our
investment company taxable income, which is
generally our ordinary income plus the excess of our realized
net short-term capital gains over our realized net long-term
capital losses.
For a discussion of the risks inherent in our portfolio
investments, see Risk Factors Risks Relating
to our Investments.
Industry
Sectors
We have invested significantly in industrial and energy related
companies. However, we continue to widen our focus in other
sectors of the economy to diversify our portfolio holdings. The
energy industry consists of companies in the direct energy value
chain as well as companies that sell products and services to,
or acquire products and services from, the direct energy value
chain. In this prospectus, we refer to all of these companies as
energy companies and assets in these companies as
energy assets. The categories of energy companies in
this chain are described below. The direct energy value chain
broadly includes upstream businesses, midstream businesses and
downstream businesses:
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream businesses find, develop and extract energy resources,
including natural gas, crude oil and coal, which are typically
from geological reservoirs found underground or offshore, and
agricultural products.
|
|
|
|
Midstream businesses gather, process, refine, store and transmit
energy resources and their by products in a form that is usable
by wholesale power generation, utility, petrochemical,
industrial and gasoline customers.
|
|
|
|
Downstream businesses include the power and electricity segment
as well as businesses that process, refine, market or distribute
hydrocarbons or other energy resources, such as customer-ready
natural gas, propane and gasoline, to end-user customers.
|
Ongoing
Relationships with Portfolio Companies
Monitoring
Prospect Capital Management monitors our portfolio companies on
an ongoing basis. Prospect Capital Management will continue to
monitor the financial trends of each portfolio company to
determine if it is meeting its business plan and to assess the
appropriate course of action for each company.
52
Prospect Capital Management employs several methods of
evaluating and monitoring the performance and value of our
investments, which may include, but are not limited to, the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Assessment of success in adhering to the portfolio
companys business plan and compliance with covenants;
|
|
|
|
Regular contact with portfolio company management and, if
appropriate, the financial or strategic sponsor, to discuss
financial position, requirements and accomplishments;
|
|
|
|
Attendance at and participation in board meetings of the
portfolio company; and
|
|
|
|
Review of monthly and quarterly financial statements and
financial projections for the portfolio company.
|
Investment
Valuation
Our Board of Directors has established procedures for the
valuation of our investment portfolio. These procedures are
detailed below.
Investments for which market quotations are readily available
are valued at such market quotations.
For most of our investments, market quotations are not
available. With respect to investments for which market
quotations are not readily available or when such market
quotations are deemed not to represent fair value, our Board of
Directors has approved a multi-step valuation process each
quarter, as described below:
1) each portfolio company or investment is reviewed by our
investment professionals with the independent valuation firm
engaged by our Board of Directors;
2) the independent valuation firm conducts independent
appraisals and makes their own independent assessment;
3) the audit committee of our Board of Directors reviews
and discusses the preliminary valuation of our Investment
Adviser and that of the independent valuation firm; and
4) the Board of Directors discusses the valuations and
determines the fair value of each investment in our portfolio in
good faith based on the input of our Investment Adviser, the
independent valuation firm and the audit committee.
Investments are valued utilizing a market approach, an income
approach, or both approaches, as appropriate. The market
approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by
market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or
liabilities (including a business). The income approach uses
valuation techniques to convert future amounts (for example,
cash flows or earnings) to a single present value amount
(discounted) calculated based on an appropriate discount rate.
The measurement is based on the net present value indicated by
current market expectations about those future amounts. In
following these approaches, the types of factors that we may
take into account in fair value pricing our investments include,
as relevant: available current market data, including relevant
and applicable market trading and transaction comparables,
applicable market yields and multiples, security covenants, call
protection provisions, information rights, the nature and
realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio companys
ability to make payments, its earnings and discounted cash
flows, the markets in which the portfolio company does business,
comparisons of financial ratios of peer companies that are
public, M&A comparables, the principal market and
enterprise values, among other factors.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC or Codification) 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820). ASC 820
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. We adopted ASC 820 on a prospective basis
beginning in the quarter ended September 30, 2008.
ASC 820 classifies the inputs used to measure these fair values
into the following hierarchy:
Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities, accessible by the Company
at the measurement date.
53
Level 2: Quoted prices for similar assets
or liabilities in active markets, or quoted prices for identical
or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active,
or other observable inputs other than quoted prices.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs for the
asset or liability.
In all cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which
the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been
determined based on the lowest level of input that is
significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the
significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement
in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific
to each investment.
The changes to generally accepted accounting principles from the
application of ASC 820 relate to the definition of fair value,
framework for measuring fair value, and the expanded disclosures
about fair value measurements. ASC 820 applies to fair value
measurements already required or permitted by other standards.
In accordance with ASC 820, the fair value of our investments is
defined as the price that we would receive upon selling an
investment in an orderly transaction to an independent buyer in
the principal or most advantageous market in which that
investment is transacted.
In April 2009, the FASB issued ASC
820-10-65,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity
for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly
(ASC
820-10-65).
This update provides further clarification for ASC 820 in
markets that are not active and provides additional guidance for
determining when the volume of trading level of activity for an
asset or liability has significantly decreased and for
identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not
orderly. ASC
820-10-65 is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after
June 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC
820-10-65
for the three and six months ended December 31, 2009, did
not have any effect on our net asset value, financial position
or results of operations as there was no change to the fair
value measurement principles set forth in ASC 820.
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
2010-06,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820):
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements
(ASC
2010-06).
ASU 2010-06
amends ASC
820-10 and
clarifies and provides additional disclosure requirements
related to recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements
and employers disclosures about postretirement benefit
plan assets. ASU
2010-06 is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2009. Our management does not believe
that the adoption of the amended guidance in ASC
820-10 will
have a significant effect on our financial statements.
For a discussion of the risks inherent in determining the value
of securities for which readily available market values do not
exist, see Risk Factors Risks relating to our
business Most of our portfolio investments are
recorded at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board
of Directors and, as a result, there is uncertainty as to the
value of our portfolio investments.
Valuation
of Other Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities
In February 2007, FASB issued ASC Subtopic
820-10-05-1,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (ASC
820-10-05-1).
ASC
820-10-05-1
permits an entity to elect fair value as the initial and
subsequent measurement attribute for many of assets and
liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected and
similar assets and liabilities measured using another
measurement attribute. We have adopted this statement on
July 1, 2008 and have elected not to value some assets and
liabilities at fair value as would be permitted by ASC
820-10-05-1.
The
Investment Adviser
Prospect Capital Management manages our investments as our
investment adviser. Prospect Capital Management is a Delaware
limited liability corporation that has been registered as an
investment adviser under the Advisers Act since March 31,
2004. Prospect Capital Management is led by John F.
Barry III and M. Grier Eliasek, two senior executives with
significant investment advisory and business experience. Both
Messrs. Barry and Eliasek spend a significant amount of
their time in their roles at Prospect Capital Management working
on the Companys behalf. The principal executive offices of
Prospect Capital Management are 10 East 40th Street,
54
44th Floor, New York, NY 10016. We depend on the diligence,
skill and network of business contacts of the senior management
of our Investment Adviser. We also depend, to a significant
extent, on our Investment Advisers investment
professionals and the information and deal flow generated by
those investment professionals in the course of their investment
and portfolio management activities. The Investment
Advisers senior management team evaluates, negotiates,
structures, closes, monitors and services our investments. Our
future success depends to a significant extent on the continued
service of the senior management team, particularly John F.
Barry III and M. Grier Eliasek. The departure of any of the
senior managers of our Investment Adviser could have a
materially adverse effect on our ability to achieve our
investment objective. In addition, we can offer no assurance
that Prospect Capital Management will remain our Investment
Adviser or that we will continue to have access to its
investment professionals or its information and deal flow. Under
our Investment Advisory Agreement, we pay Prospect Capital
Management investment advisory fees, which consist of an annual
base management fee based on our gross assets as well as a
two-part incentive fee based on our performance. Mr. Barry
currently controls Prospect Capital Management. See
Management Management Services
Board of Directors approval of the Investment Advisory
Agreement.
As a business development company, we offer, and must provide
upon request, managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio
companies. This assistance could involve, among other things,
monitoring the operations of our portfolio companies,
participating in board and management meetings, consulting with
and advising officers of portfolio companies and providing other
organizational and financial guidance. We may receive fees for
these services. Such fees would not qualify as good
income for purposes of the 90% income test that we must
meet each year to qualify as a RIC. Prospect Administration
provides such managerial assistance on our behalf to portfolio
companies when we are required to provide this assistance.
Staffing
Mr. John F. Barry III, our chairman and chief executive
officer, Mr. Grier Eliasek, our chief operating officer and
president, and Mr. Brian H. Oswald, our chief financial
officer, chief compliance officer, treasurer and secretary,
comprise our senior management. Over time, we expect to add
additional officers and employees. Messrs. Barry and
Eliasek each also serves as an officer of Prospect
Administration and performs his respective functions under the
terms of the Administration Agreement. Our
day-to-day
investment operations are managed by Prospect Capital
Management. In addition, we reimburse Prospect Administration
for our allocable portion of expenses incurred by it in
performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement,
including rent and our allocable portion of the costs of our
Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer,
Chief Operating Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary and their respective staffs. See
Management Management Services
Administration Agreement.
Properties
We do not own any real estate or other physical properties
materially important to our operation. Our corporate
headquarters are located at 10 East 40th Street,
44th Floor, New York, NY 10016, where we occupy an office
space pursuant to the Administration Agreement.
Legal
Proceedings
On December 6, 2004, Dallas Gas Partners, L.P.
(DGP) served us with a complaint filed
November 30, 2004 in the U.S. District for the
Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division. DGP alleges that
DGP was defrauded and that we breached our fiduciary duty to DGP
and tortiously interfered with DGPs contract to purchase
Gas Solutions, Ltd. (a subsidiary of our portfolio company,
GSHI) in connection with our alleged agreement in September 2004
to loan DGP funds with which DGP intended to buy Gas Solutions,
Ltd. for approximately $26 million. The complaint sought
relief not limited to $100 million. On November 30,
2005, U.S. Magistrate Judge John R. Froeschner of the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Galveston Division, issued a recommendation that the court grant
our Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing all claims by DGP. On
February 21, 2006, U.S. District Judge Samuel Kent of
the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Galveston Division issued an order granting our Motion for
Summary Judgment dismissing all claims by DGP, against us. On
May 16, 2007, the Court also granted us summary judgment on
DGPs liability to us on our
55
counterclaim for DGPs breach of a release and covenant not
to sue. On January 4, 2008, the Court, Judge Melinda Harmon
presiding, granted our motion to dismiss all DGPs claims
asserted against certain of our officers and affiliates. On
August 20, 2008, Judge Harmon entered a Final Judgment
dismissing all of DGPs claims. DGP appealed to the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which affirmed
the Final Judgment on June 24, 2009. DGP has moved for
rehearing. Our damage claims against DGP remain pending.
In May 2006, based in part on unfavorable due diligence and the
absence of investment committee approval, we declined to extend
a loan for $10 million to a potential borrower
(plaintiff). Plaintiff was subsequently sued by its
own attorney in a local Texas court for plaintiffs failure
to pay fees owed to its attorney. In December 2006, plaintiff
filed a cross-action against us and certain of our affiliates
(the defendants) in the same local Texas court,
alleging, among other things, tortious interference with
contract and fraud. We petitioned the United States District
Court for the Southern District of New York (the District
Court) to compel arbitration and to enjoin the Texas
action. In February 2007, our motions were granted. Plaintiff
appealed that decision. On July 24, 2008, the Second
Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the District
Court. The arbitration commenced in July 2007 and concluded in
late November 2007. Post-hearing briefings were completed in
February 2008. On April 14, 2008, the arbitrator rendered
an award in our favor, rejecting all of plaintiffs claims.
On April 18, 2008, we filed a petition before the District
Court to confirm the award. On October 8, 2008, the
District Court granted the Companys petition to confirm
the award, confirmed the awards and subsequently entered
judgment thereon in favor of the Company in the amount of
$2.3 million. After filing a defective notice of appeal to
the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on
November 5, 2008, plaintiffs counsel resubmitted a
new notice of appeal on January 9, 2009. The plaintiff
subsequently requested that the Company agree to stipulate to
the withdrawal of plaintiffs appeal to the Second Circuit.
Such a stipulation was filed with the Second Circuit on or about
April 14, 2009. Based on this stipulation, the Second
Circuit issued a mandate terminating the appeal, which was
transmitted to the District Court on April 23, 2009.
Post-judgment discovery against plaintiff is continuing and we
have filed a motion for sanctions against plaintiffs
counsel. Argument for the motion for sanctions was held on
November 19, 2009 and a decision from the court is pending.
We are involved in various investigations, claims and legal
proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business.
These matters may relate to intellectual property, employment,
tax, regulation, contract or other matters. The resolution of
such matters that may arise out of these investigations, claims
and proceedings will be subject to various uncertainties and,
even if such matters are without merit, could result in the
expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.
We are not aware of any other material pending legal proceeding,
and no such material proceedings are contemplated to which we
are a party or of which any of our property is subject.
Management
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our
Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors currently consists of
five directors, three of whom are not interested
persons of the Company as defined in Section 2(a)(19)
of the 1940 Act. We refer to these individuals as our
independent directors. Our Board of Directors elects our
officers to serve for a one-year term and until their successors
are duly elected and qualify, or until their earlier removal or
resignation.
Board Of
Directors And Executive Officers
Under our charter, our directors are divided into three classes.
Directors are elected for a staggered term of three years each,
with a term of office of one of the three classes of directors
expiring each year. At each annual meeting of our stockholders,
the successors to the class of directors whose terms expire at
such meeting are elected to hold office for a term expiring at
the annual meeting of stockholders held in the third year
following the year of their election. Each director holds office
for the term to which he or she is elected and until his or her
successor is duly elected and qualifies.
56
Directors
and Executive Officers
Our directors and executive officers and their positions are set
forth below. The address for each director and executive officer
is
c/o Prospect
Capital Corporation, 10 East 40th Street, 44th Floor,
New York, NY 10016.
Independent
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
in Fund
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Office(1) and
|
|
|
|
Complex
|
|
Directorships
|
|
|
Held with
|
|
Length of
|
|
Principal Occupation(s) During Past
|
|
Overseen by
|
|
Held by
|
Name and Age
|
|
the Company
|
|
Time Served
|
|
5 Years
|
|
Director
|
|
Director(2)
|
|
Graham D.S. Anderson, 45
|
|
Director
|
|
Class I Director since September 2008; Term expires 2011
|
|
General Partner of Euclid SR Partners from 2000 to present. From
1996 to 2000, Mr. Anderson was a General Partner of Euclid
Partners, the predecessor to Euclid SR Partners.
|
|
One
|
|
None
|
Eugene S. Stark, 52
|
|
Director
|
|
Class III Director since September 2008; Term expires 2010
|
|
Principal Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer and Vice
President Administration of General American
Investors Company, Inc. from May 2005 to present. Prior to his
role with General American Investors Company, Inc., Mr. Stark
served as the Chief Financial Officer of Prospect Capital
Corporation from January 2005 to April 2005. From May 1987 to
December 2004 Mr. Stark served as Senior
Vice President and Vice President with Prudential
Financial, Inc.
|
|
One
|
|
None
|
Andrew C. Cooper, 48
|
|
Director
|
|
Class II Director since February 2009; Term expires 2012
|
|
Mr. Cooper is an entrepreneur, who over the last 11 years
has founded, built, run and sold three companies. He is Co-Chief
Executive Officer of Unison Site Management, Inc., a specialty
finance company focusing on cell site easements, and Executive
Director of Brand Asset Digital, a digital media marketing and
distribution company. Prior to that, Mr. Cooper focused on
venture capital and investment banking for Morgan Stanley for
14 years.
|
|
One
|
|
Unison Site
Management, LLC,
Brand Asset
Digital, LLC and
Aquatic Energy, LLC
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes of
directors serving staggered three-year terms. Mr. Anderson
is a Class I director with a term that will expire in 2011,
Mr. Eliasek and Mr. Cooper are Class II directors
with terms that will expire in 2012 and Mr. Barry and
Mr. Stark are Class III directors with terms that will
expire in 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
No director otherwise serves as a director of an investment
company subject to the 1940 Act. |
57
Interested
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
Principal
|
|
in Fund
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Office(1) and
|
|
Occupation(s)
|
|
Complex
|
|
Directorships
|
|
|
Held with
|
|
Length of
|
|
During
|
|
Overseen by
|
|
Held by
|
Name and Age
|
|
the Company
|
|
Time Served
|
|
Past 5 Years
|
|
Director
|
|
Director(2)
|
|
John F. Barry III,(3) 57
|
|
Director, Chairman of the Board of Directors, and Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
Class III Director since June 2004; Term expires 2010
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company; Managing
Director and Chairman of the Investment Committee of Prospect
Capital Management and Prospect Administration since June 2004;
Managing Director of Prospect Capital Management.
|
|
One
|
|
None
|
M. Grier Eliasek,(3) 36
|
|
Director, President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
Class II Director since June 2004; Term expires 2012
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, Managing
Director of Prospect Capital Management and Prospect
Administration
|
|
One
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes of
directors serving staggered three-year terms. Mr. Anderson
is a Class I director with a term that will expire in 2011,
Mr. Eliasek and Mr. Cooper are Class II directors
with terms that will expire in 2012 and Mr. Barry and
Mr. Stark are Class III directors with terms that will
expire in 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
No director otherwise serves as a director of an investment
company subject to the 1940 Act. |
|
(3) |
|
Messrs. Barry and Eliasek are each considered an
interested person under the 1940 Act by virtue of
serving as one of our officers and having a relationship with
Prospect Capital Management. |
Information
about Executive Officers who are not Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
|
Held with
|
|
Office and Length of
|
|
Principal Occupation(s)
|
Name and Age
|
|
the Company
|
|
Time Served
|
|
During Past Five Years
|
|
Brian H. Oswald, 49
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary
|
|
November 2008 to present as Chief Financial Officer and October
2008 to present as Chief Compliance Officer
|
|
Joined Prospect Administration as Managing Director in June
2008. Previously Managing Director in Structured Finance Group
at GSC Group (2006 to 2008) and Chief Financial Officer at
Capital Trust, Inc. (2003 to 2005)
|
Independent
Directors
Graham D.S. Anderson. Mr. Anderson has
served as General Partner of Euclid SR Partners from 1996 to
present. Mr. Anderson currently serves as a member of the
Board of Directors of Acurian, Inc. (a clinical trial
recruitment company), FatWire Software Corp. (a web content
management company), iJet Risk Management (an operational risk
management information company), Plateau Systems Limited (a
human capital management software company) and SkinMedica Inc.
(a dermatology and cosmeceuticals company).
Andrew C. Cooper. Mr. Cooper has
24 years of experience in growth company management,
venture investing and investment banking. He has a wide range of
operational, marketing, technology, and debt and equity capital
raising expertise. Mr. Cooper is an entrepreneur, who over
the last 11 years has founded, built, run and sold three
companies. Prior to that, Mr. Cooper focused on venture
capital and investment banking for Morgan Stanley for
14 years. He is Co-Chief Executive Officer of Unison Site
Management, Inc., a specialty finance company focusing on cell
site easements, and Executive Director of Brand Asset Digital, a
digital media marketing and distribution company. His current
Board appointments include Unison Site Management, LLC, Brand
Asset Digital, LLC and Aquatic Energy, LLC.
58
Eugene S. Stark. Mr. Stark has served as
Principal Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer and
Vice President Administration of General
American Investors Company, Inc. from May 2005 to present. Prior
to his role with General American Investors Company, Inc.,
Mr. Stark served as the Chief Financial Officer of Prospect
Capital Corporation from January 2005 to April 2005. From May
1987 to December 2004 Mr. Stark served as Senior Vice
President (division level) and Vice President (corporate level)
with Prudential Financial, Inc. in various financial management
positions. Mr. Stark serves as a member of the Board of
Directors of Prospect Capital Funding LLC, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company, and sits on the Board of Trustees and
is a Member of the Finance Committee of Mount Saint Mary Academy.
Interested
Directors
John F. Barry III. Mr. Barry is chairman
and chief executive officer of the Company and is a control
person of Prospect Capital Management and a managing director of
Prospect Administration. Mr. Barry is chairman of
Prospects investment committee and has been an officer of
Prospect since 1990. In addition to overseeing Prospect,
Mr. Barry has served on the boards of directors of twelve
private and public Prospect portfolio companies. Mr. Barry
has served on the board of advisors of USEC Inc., a
publicly-traded energy company. Mr. Barry has served as
chairman and chief executive officer of Bondnet Trading Systems.
From 1988 to 1989, Mr. Barry managed the investment bank of
L.F. Rothschild & Company, focusing on private equity
and debt financings for energy and other companies. From 1983 to
1988, Mr. Barry was a senior investment and merchant banker
at Merrill Lynch & Co., where he was a founding member
of the project finance group, executing more than
$4 billion in energy and other financings. From 1979 to
1983, Mr. Barry was a corporate securities attorney at
Davis Polk & Wardwell, where he advised energy
companies and their commercial and investment bankers. From 1978
to 1979, Mr. Barry served as law clerk to Circuit Judge,
formerly Chief Judge, J. Edward Lumbard of the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City.
Mr. Barry is chairman of the board of directors of the
Mathematics Foundation of America, a non-profit foundation which
enhances opportunities in mathematics education for students
from diverse backgrounds. Mr. Barry received his JD cum
laude from Harvard Law School, where he was an editor of the
Harvard Law Review, and his Bachelor of Arts magna cum laude
from Princeton University, where he was a University Scholar.
M. Grier Eliasek. Mr. Eliasek is
president and chief operating officer of the Company and a
managing director of Prospect Capital Management and Prospect
Administration. At the Company, Mr. Eliasek is responsible
for various administrative and investment management functions
and leads and supervises other Prospect professionals in
origination and assessment of investments. Mr. Eliasek has
served as a senior investment professional at Prospect since
1999. Prior to joining Prospect, Mr. Eliasek assisted the
chief financial officer of Amazon.com in 1999 in corporate
strategy, customer acquisition, and new product launches. From
1995 to 1998, Mr. Eliasek served as a consultant with
Bain & Company, a global strategy consulting firm,
where he managed engagements for companies in several different
industries. At Bain, Mr. Eliasek analyzed new lines of
businesses, developed market strategies, revamped sales
organizations and improved operational performance.
Mr. Eliasek received his MBA from Harvard Business School.
Mr. Eliasek received his Bachelor of Science in Chemical
Engineering with Highest Distinction from the University of
Virginia, where he was a Jefferson Scholar and a Rodman Scholar.
Executive
Officer
Brian H. Oswald. Mr. Oswald is chief
financial officer, chief compliance officer, secretary and
treasurer of the Company. He began his career at KPMG Peat
Marwick, where he held various positions over his ten-year
tenure, finishing as a Senior Manager in the financial
institutions group. During his time at KPMG, he served as the
reviewing senior manager for several initial public offerings of
financial institutions. After KPMG, Mr. Oswald served as
the Executive Vice President and President of Gloversville
Federal Savings and Loan Association, served as the Director of
Financial Reporting and Subsidiary Accounting for River Bank
America and served as the Corporate Controller for Magic
Solutions, Inc. In each of these positions, Mr. Oswald
instituted significant operational changes and was instrumental
in raising additional equity for River Bank America. From 2003
to 2005, Mr. Oswald led Capital Trust, Inc., a self-managed
finance and investment management REIT which specializes in
credit-sensitive structured financial products, as Chief
Financial Officer. From 1997 to 2003, he served as Chief
Accounting Officer for Capital Trust. Prior to joining the
Company, Mr. Oswald spent two years with the Structured
59
Finance Division of GSC Group, serving as Managing Director of
Finance for this asset management company. At GSC,
Mr. Oswald managed the finances for a REIT, two hedge funds
and thirteen CDOs. Mr. Oswald joined the Administrator on
June 16, 2008. Mr. Oswald holds a B.A. degree in
Accounting from Moravian College. He is a licensed Certified
Public Accountant in the States of New York and Pennsylvania,
and is a Certified Management Accountant. Mr. Oswald also
serves as a board member of RMJ Laboratories, Inc.
For information on the investment professionals of Prospect
Capital Management, see Business The
Investment Adviser Staffing.
Committees
of the Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee and a
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. For the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2009, our Board of Directors held
twenty-two Board of Director meetings, eleven Audit Committee
meetings, and five Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
meeting. All directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate
number of meetings of the Board of Directors and of the
respective committees on which they served. We require each
director to make a diligent effort to attend all board and
committee meetings, as well as each annual meeting of
stockholders.
The Audit Committee. The Audit Committee
operates pursuant to a charter approved by the Board of
Directors. The charter sets forth the responsibilities of the
Audit Committee, which include selecting or retaining each year
an independent registered public accounting firm, or the
independent accountants, to audit the accounts and records of
the Company; reviewing and discussing with management and the
independent accountants the annual audited financial statements
of the Company, including disclosures made in managements
discussion and analysis, and recommending to the Board of
Directors whether the audited financial statements should be
included in the Companys annual report on
Form 10-K;
reviewing and discussing with management and the independent
accountants the Companys quarterly financial statements
prior to the filings of its quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q;
pre-approving the independent accountants engagement to
render audit
and/or
permissible non-audit services; and evaluating the
qualifications, performance and independence of the independent
accountants. The Audit Committee is presently composed of three
persons: Messrs. Anderson, Cooper and Stark, each of whom
is not an interested person as defined in the 1940
Act and is considered independent under the Marketplace Rules of
the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC. The Companys Board of
Directors has determined that Mr. Stark is an audit
committee financial expert as that term is defined under
Item 407 of
Regulation S-K
and Mr. Stark serves as the Chairman of the Audit
Committee. The Audit Committee may delegate its pre-approval
responsibilities to one or more of its members. The member(s) to
whom such responsibility is delegated must report, for
informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the
Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
Messrs. Stark, Anderson and Cooper were added to the Audit
Committee concurrent with their election to the Board of
Directors on September 4, 2008, September 15, 2008 and
February 12, 2009, respectively.
The function of the Audit Committee is oversight. Our management
is primarily responsible for maintaining appropriate systems for
accounting and financial reporting principles and policies and
internal controls and procedures that provide for compliance
with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations.
The independent accountants are primarily responsible for
planning and carrying out a proper audit of our annual financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
standards. The independent accountants are accountable to the
Board of Directors and the Audit Committee, as representatives
of our stockholders. The Board of Directors and the Audit
Committee have the ultimate authority and responsibility to
select, evaluate and, where appropriate, replace our independent
accountants (subject, if applicable, to stockholder
ratification).
In fulfilling their responsibilities, it is recognized that
members of the Audit Committee are not our full-time employees
or management and are not, and do not represent themselves to
be, accountants or auditors by profession. As such, it is not
the duty or the responsibility of the Audit Committee or its
members to conduct field work or other types of
auditing or accounting reviews or procedures, to determine that
the financial statements are complete and accurate and are in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or to
set auditor independence standards. Each member of the Audit
Committee is entitled to rely on (a) the integrity of those
persons within and outside us and management from which it
receives information; (b) the accuracy of the financial and
other information provided to the Audit Committee absent actual
knowledge to the contrary (which is required to be
60
promptly reported to the Board of Directors); and
(c) statements made by our officers and employees, our
Investment Adviser or other third parties as to any information
technology, internal audit and other non-audit services provided
by the independent accountants to us.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee, or the Nominating and Governance
Committee, is responsible for selecting qualified nominees to be
elected to the Board of Directors by stockholders; selecting
qualified nominees to fill any vacancies on the Board of
Directors or a committee thereof; developing and recommending to
the Board of Directors a set of corporate governance principles
applicable to the Company; overseeing the evaluation of the
Board of Directors and management; and undertaking such other
duties and responsibilities as may from time to time be
delegated by the Board of Directors to the Nominating and
Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee is
presently composed of three persons: Messrs. Anderson,
Cooper and Stark, each of whom is not an interested
person as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act
and Mr. Anderson serves as the Chairman of the Nominating
and Governance Committee. Messrs. Stark, Anderson and
Cooper were added to the Nominating and Governance Committee
concurrent with their election to the Board of Directors on
September 4, 2008, September 15, 2008 and
February 12, 2009, respectively.
The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider
stockholder recommendations for possible nominees for election
as directors when such recommendations are submitted in
accordance with the Companys bylaws and any applicable
law, rule or regulation regarding director nominations.
Nominations should be sent to the Corporate Secretary,
c/o Prospect
Capital Corporation, 10 East 40th Street, 44th Floor,
New York, New York 10016. When submitting a nomination to the
Company for consideration, a stockholder must provide all
information that would be required under applicable SEC rules to
be disclosed in connection with election of a director,
including the following minimum information for each director
nominee: full name, age and address; principal occupation during
the past five years; current directorships on publicly held
companies and investment companies; number of shares of our
common stock owned, if any; and, a written consent of the
individual to stand for election if nominated by the Board of
Directors and to serve if elected by the stockholders. Criteria
considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee in
evaluating the qualifications of individuals for election as
members of the Board of Directors include compliance with the
independence and other applicable requirements of the
Marketplace Rules of NASDAQ and the 1940 Act and all other
applicable laws, rules, regulations and listing standards, the
criteria, policies and principles set forth in the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, and the ability to
contribute to the effective management of the Company, taking
into account our needs and such factors as the individuals
experience, perspective, skills, expertise and knowledge of the
industries in which the Company operates, personal and
professional integrity, character, business judgment, time
availability in light of other commitments, dedication and
conflicts of interest. The Nominating and Governance Committee
also may consider such other factors as it may deem to be in our
best interests and those of our stockholders. The Board of
Directors also believes it is appropriate for certain key
members of our management to participate as members of the Board
of Directors.
Corporate
Governance
Corporate Governance Guidelines. Upon the
recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, the
Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines
on behalf of the Company. These Corporate Governance Guidelines
address, among other things, the following key corporate
governance topics: director responsibilities; the size,
composition, and membership criteria of the Board of Directors;
composition and responsibilities of directors serving on
committees of the Board of Directors; director access to
officers, employees, and independent advisors; director
orientation and continuing education; director compensation; and
an annual performance evaluation of the Board of Directors.
Code of Conduct. We have adopted a code of
conduct which applies to, among others, our senior officers,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as well as all of our employees. Our code of conduct is
an exhibit to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC, and can be accessed via the Internet site of
the SEC at
http://www.sec.gov.
We intend to disclose amendments to or waivers from a required
provision of the code of conduct on
Form 8-K.
Code of Ethics. We, Prospect Capital
Management and Prospect Administration have each adopted a code
of ethics pursuant to
Rule 17j-1
under the 1940 Act that establishes procedures for personal
investments and restricts
61
certain personal securities transactions. Personnel subject to
each code may invest in securities for their personal investment
accounts, including securities that may be purchased or held by
us, so long as such investments are made in accordance with the
codes requirements.
Internal Reporting and Whistle Blower Protection
Policy. The Companys Audit Committee has
established guidelines and procedures regarding the receipt,
retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting,
internal accounting controls or auditing matters, collectively,
Accounting Matters, and the confidential, anonymous submission
by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting
or auditing matters. Persons with complaints or concerns
regarding Accounting Matters may submit their complaints to our
Chief Compliance Officer, or CCO. Persons who are uncomfortable
submitting complaints to the CCO, including complaints involving
the CCO, may submit complaints directly to our Audit Committee
Chairman. Complaints may be submitted on an anonymous basis.
The CCO may be contacted at: Prospect Capital Corporation, Chief
Compliance Officer, 10 East 40th Street, 44th Floor,
New York, New York 10016.
The Audit Committee Chairman may be contacted at: Prospect
Capital Corporation, Audit Committee Chairman, 10 East
40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, New York 10016.
Independent
Directors
The Board of Directors, in connection with the 1940 Act and the
applicable Marketplace Rules of NASDAQ, has considered the
independence of members of the Board of Directors who are not
employed by Prospect Capital Management and has concluded that
Messrs. Anderson, Cooper and Stark are not interested
persons as defined by the 1940 Act and therefore qualify
as independent directors under the standards promulgated by the
Marketplace Rules of NASDAQ. In reaching this conclusion, the
Board of Directors concluded that Messrs. Anderson, Cooper
and Stark had no relationships with Prospect Capital Management
or any of its affiliates, other than their positions as
directors of the Company and, if applicable, investments in us
that are on the same terms as those of other stockholders.
Proxy
Voting Policies And Procedures
We have delegated our proxy voting responsibility to Prospect
Capital Management. The guidelines are reviewed periodically by
Prospect Capital Management and our non-interested directors,
and, accordingly, are subject to change. See
Regulation Proxy Voting Policies and
Procedures.
Compensation
of Directors and Officers
The following table sets forth information regarding the
compensation received by the directors and executive officers
from the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.
No compensation is paid to the interested directors by the
Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Accrued as Part of
|
|
|
Total Compensation
|
|
|
|
from the
|
|
|
the Companys
|
|
|
Paid to Director/
|
|
Name and Position
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Expenses(1)
|
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
Interested Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John F. Barry(2)
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
M. Grier Eliasek(2)
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
Independent Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graham D.S. Anderson(3)
|
|
$
|
67,750
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
67,750
|
|
Andrew C. Cooper(4)
|
|
$
|
32,381
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
32,381
|
|
Eugene S. Stark(5)
|
|
$
|
70,500
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
70,500
|
|
Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William E. Vastardis(6,7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian H. Oswald(2)
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We do not have a bonus, profit sharing or retirement plan, and
directors do not receive any pension or retirement benefits. |
62
|
|
|
(2) |
|
We have not paid, and we do not intend to pay, any annual cash
compensation to our executive officers for their services as
executive officers. Messrs. Barry and Eliasek are
compensated by Prospect Capital Management from the income
Prospect Capital Management receives under the management
agreement between Prospect Capital Management and us.
Mr. Oswald is compensated by Prospect Administration from
the income Prospect Administration receives under the
Administration Agreement. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Anderson joined our Board of Directors on
September 15, 2008. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Cooper joined our Board of Directors on
February 12, 2009. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Stark joined our Board of Directors on
September 4, 2008. |
|
(6) |
|
Mr. Vastardis is no longer employed by the Company, but
served as Chief Compliance Officer from January 4, 2005
through September 30, 2008, and served as Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer from April 30, 2005 through
November 11, 2008. Mr. Vastardis served as Secretary
from April 30, 2005 through June 6, 2008. |
|
(7) |
|
The compensation of William E. Vastardis for his service as
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company was paid by
Vastardis Fund Services LLC, formerly our
sub-administrator.
Vastardis Fund Services was in turn paid by the Company at
a monthly minimum rate of $33,333.33 or annual fees on gross
assets of 0.20% on the first $250 million, 0.15% on the
next $250 million, 0.10% on the next $250 million,
0.075% on the next $250 million and 0.05% over one billion.
The compensation of William E. Vastardis for his service as
Chief Compliance Officer of the Company was paid by Vastardis
Compliance Services LLC. Vastardis Compliance Services LLC was
in turn paid by the Company at a monthly rate of $6,250. In
addition, the Company paid Vastardis Compliance Services LLC for
certain other services at the rate of $270 per hour. Both
Vastardis Fund Services LLC and Vastardis Compliance
Services LLC determined the compensation to be paid to
Mr. Vastardis with respect to the Company based on a
case-by-case
evaluation of the time and resources that is required to fulfill
his duties to the Company. For the fiscal year ending
June 30, 2009, the Company paid Vastardis Compliance
Services LLC $25,000 for services rendered by Mr. Vastardis
as Chief Compliance Officer. For the fiscal year ending
June 30, 2009, the Company paid Vastardis
Fund Services LLC approximately $827,083 for services
required to be provided by Prospect Administration, including,
but not limited to, (a) clerical, bookkeeping and record
keeping services, (b) conducting relations with custodians,
depositories, transfer agents and other third-party service
providers and (c) furnishing reports to Prospect
Administration and the Board of Directors of the Company of its
performance of obligations. In addition, the fees paid to
Vastardis Fund Service LLC cover the services rendered by
Mr. Vastardis as our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. |
Effective July 1, 2008, the independent directors received
an annual fee of $90,000 plus reimbursement of any reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred. The chairman of the Audit Committee received
an additional annual cash retainer of $7,500 and the chairman of
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee received an
additional annual cash retainer of $5,000. Effective
September 15, 2008, the independent directors who do not
serve on any committees of the board receive an annual fee of
$11,250.
Effective October 1, 2008, the independent directors who
serve on a committee of the Board receive an annual fee of
$85,000 plus reimbursement of any reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred and committee chairmen no longer receive any
additional compensation.
Effective January 12, 2009, the independent directors who
serve on both committees of the Board receive an annual fee of
$85,000 plus reimbursement of any reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred, the independent directors who serve on one
committee of the Board receive an annual fee of $60,000 plus
reimbursement of any reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred and the independent directors who do not serve
on any committees of the board receive an annual fee of $11,250.
No compensation was paid to directors who are interested persons
of the Company as defined in 1940 Act. In addition, the Company
purchases directors and officers liability insurance
on behalf of the directors and officers. Through
December 31, 2009, each of the three independent directors
has been paid $42, 500 for the fiscal year ending June 30,
2010.
63
Management
Services
Investment
Advisory Agreement
We have entered into the Investment Advisory Agreement with
Prospect Capital Management under which the Investment Adviser,
subject to the overall supervision of our Board of Directors,
manages the
day-to-day
operations of, and provides investment advisory services to, us.
Under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, our
Investment Adviser: (i) determines the composition of our
portfolio, the nature and timing of the changes to our portfolio
and the manner of implementing such changes,
(ii) identifies, evaluates and negotiates the structure of
the investments we make (including performing due diligence on
our prospective portfolio companies); and (iii) closes and
monitors investments we make.
Prospect Capital Managements services under the Investment
Advisory Agreement are not exclusive, and it is free to furnish
similar services to other entities so long as its services to us
are not impaired. For providing these services the Investment
Adviser receives a fee from us, consisting of two components: a
base management fee and an incentive fee. The base management
fee is calculated at an annual rate of 2% on our gross assets
(including amounts borrowed). For services rendered under the
Investment Advisory Agreement, the base management fee is
payable quarterly in arrears. The base management fee is
calculated based on the average value of our gross assets at the
end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters and
appropriately adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases
during the current calendar quarter. Base management fees for
any partial month or quarter are appropriately prorated.
The incentive fee has two parts. The first part, the income
incentive fee, which is payable quarterly in arrears, will equal
20% of the excess, if any, of our pre-incentive fee net
investment income that exceeds a 1.75% quarterly (7% annualized)
hurdle rate, subject to a catch up provision
measured as of the end of each calendar quarter. In the three
months ended December 31, 2009, we paid an incentive fee of
$4.23 million (see calculation below). For this purpose,
pre-incentive fee net investment income means interest income,
dividend income and any other income (including any other fees
(other than fees for providing managerial assistance), such as
commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting
fees and other fees that we receive from portfolio companies)
accrued during the calendar quarter, minus our operating
expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee,
expenses payable under the Administration Agreement described
below, and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued
and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive
fee). Pre-incentive fee net investment income includes, in the
case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as
original issue discount, debt instruments with payment in kind
interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that we
have not yet received in cash. Pre-incentive fee net investment
income does not include any realized capital gains, realized
capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or
depreciation. Pre-incentive fee net investment income, expressed
as a rate of return on the value of our net assets at the end of
the immediately preceding calendar quarter, is compared to a
hurdle rate of 1.75% per quarter (7% annualized).
We expect the incentive fees we pay to increase to the extent we
earn greater interest and dividend income through our
investments in portfolio companies and, to a lesser extent,
realize capital gains upon the sale of warrants or other equity
investments in our portfolio companies and to decrease if our
interest and dividend income and capital gains decrease. The
catch-up
provision requires us to pay 100% of our pre-incentive fee net
investment income with respect to that portion of such income,
if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than 125% of
the quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar quarter (8.75%
annualized assuming an annualized hurdle rate of 7%). The
catch-up
provision is meant to provide Prospect Capital Management with
20% of our pre-incentive fee net investment income as if a
hurdle rate did not apply when our pre-incentive fee net
investment income exceeds 125% of the quarterly hurdle rate in
any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized assuming an annualized
hurdle rate of 7%). The income incentive fee will be computed
and paid on income that may include interest that is accrued but
not yet received in cash. If interest income is accrued but
never paid, the Board of Directors would decide to write off the
accrual in the quarter when the accrual is determined to be
uncollectible. The write off would cause a decrease in interest
income for the quarter equal to the amount of the prior accrual.
The Investment Adviser is not under any obligation to reimburse
us for any part of the incentive fee it received that was based
on accrued income that we never receive as a result of a default
by an entity on the obligation that resulted in the accrual of
such income.
64
The net investment income used to calculate this part of the
incentive fee is also included in the amount of the gross assets
used to calculate the 2% base management fee. We pay the
Investment Adviser an income incentive fee with respect to our
pre-incentive fee net investment income in each calendar quarter
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
no incentive fee in any calendar quarter in which our
pre-incentive fee net investment income does not exceed the
hurdle rate;
|
|
|
|
100.00% of our pre-incentive fee net investment income with
respect to that portion of such pre-incentive fee net investment
income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than
125.00% of the quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar quarter
(8.75% annualized assuming a 7.00% annualized hurdle
rate); and
|
|
|
|
20.00% of the amount of our pre-incentive fee net investment
income, if any, that exceeds 125.00% of the quarterly hurdle
rate in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized assuming a 7.00%
annualized hurdle rate).
|
These calculations are appropriately prorated for any period of
less than three months and adjusted for any share issuances or
repurchases during the current quarter.
The second part of the incentive fee, the capital gains
incentive fee, is determined and payable in arrears as of the
end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment
Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date), and equals 20%
of our realized capital gains for the calendar year, if any,
computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized
capital depreciation at the end of such year. In determining the
capital gains incentive fee payable to the Investment Adviser,
we calculate the aggregate realized capital gains, aggregate
realized capital losses and aggregate unrealized capital
depreciation, as applicable, with respect to each investment
that has been in our portfolio. For the purpose of this
calculation, an investment is defined as the total
of all rights and claims which may be asserted against a
portfolio company arising out of our participation in the debt,
equity, and other financial instruments issued by that company.
Aggregate realized capital gains, if any, equals the sum of the
differences between the aggregate net sales price of each
investment and the aggregate cost basis of such investment when
sold or otherwise disposed. Aggregate realized capital losses
equal the sum of the amounts by which the aggregate net sales
price of each investment is less than the aggregate cost basis
of such investment when sold or otherwise disposed. Aggregate
unrealized capital depreciation equals the sum of the
differences, if negative, between the aggregate valuation of
each investment and the aggregate cost basis of such investment
as of the applicable calendar year-end. At the end of the
applicable calendar year, the amount of capital gains that
serves as the basis for our calculation of the capital gains
incentive fee involves netting aggregate realized capital gains
against aggregate realized capital losses on a since-inception
basis and then reducing this amount by the aggregate unrealized
capital depreciation. If this number is positive, then the
capital gains incentive fee payable is equal to 20% of such
amount, less the aggregate amount of any capital gains incentive
fees paid since inception.
The following is a calculation of the most recently paid
incentive fee paid in January 2010 (for the quarter ended
December 31, 2009) (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Prior Quarter Net Asset Value (adjusted for stock offerings
during the quarter)
|
|
$
|
637,507
|
|
Quarterly Hurdle Rate
|
|
|
1.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Quarter Hurdle
|
|
$
|
11,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125% of the Quarterly Hurdle Rate
|
|
|
2.1875
|
%
|
125% of the Current Quarter Hurdle
|
|
$
|
13,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Quarter Pre Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
|
|
$
|
21,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Fee
Catch-Up
|
|
$
|
2,789
|
|
Incentive Fee 20% in excess of 125% of the Current
Quarter Hurdle
|
|
$
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Quarter Incentive Fee
|
|
$
|
4,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total base management fees earned by and paid to Prospect
Capital Management during the twelve months ended June 30,
2009, June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007 were
$11.9 million, $8.9 million and $5.4 million,
65
respectively. The total base management fees earned by and paid
to Prospect Capital Management for the six months ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009 were
$6.4 million and $5.7 million, respectively.
The income incentive fees were $14.8 million,
$11.3 million and $5.8 million for the twelve months
ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and June 30,
2007, respectively. No capital gains incentive fees were earned
for the twelve months ended June 30, 2009, June 30,
2008 and June 30, 2007. The total income incentive fees for
the six months ended December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 were $7.3 million and
$8.9 million, respectively.
The total investment advisory fees were $26.7 million,
$20.2 million and $11.2 million for the twelve months
ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and June 30,
2007, respectively. The total investment advisory fees for the
six months ended December 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008 were $13.7 million and $14.6 million,
respectively.
Because of the structure of the incentive fee, it is possible
that we may have to pay an incentive fee in a quarter where we
incur a loss. For example, if we receive pre-incentive fee net
investment income in excess of the hurdle rate for a quarter, we
will pay the applicable income incentive fee even if we have
incurred negative total return in that quarter due to realized
or unrealized losses on our investments.
Examples
of Quarterly Incentive Fee Calculation
Example 1: Income Incentive Fee(*):
Alternative 1
Assumptions
Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) =
1.25%
Hurdle rate(1) = 1.75%
Base management fee(2) = 0.50%
Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent,
etc.)(3) = 0.20%
|
|
|
(*) |
|
The hypothetical amount of pre-incentive fee net investment
income shown is based on a percentage of total net assets. |
|
(1) |
|
Represents 7% annualized hurdle rate |
|
(2) |
|
Represents 2% annualized base management fee. |
|
(3) |
|
Excludes organizational and offering expenses. |
Pre-incentive fee net investment income (investment
income (base management fee + other expenses)) =
0.55%
Pre-incentive net investment income does not exceed hurdle rate,
therefore there is no income incentive fee.
Alternative 2
Assumptions
Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) =
2.70%
Hurdle rate(1) = 1.75%
Base management fee(2) = 0.50%
Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent,
etc.)(3) = 0.20%
Pre-incentive fee net investment income (investment
income (base management fee + other expenses)) = 2%
66
Pre-incentive net investment income exceeds hurdle rate,
therefore there is an income incentive fee payable by us to our
Investment Adviser.
|
|
|
Income incentive Fee
|
|
= 100% × Catch Up + the greater of 0% AND
(20% × (pre-incentive fee net investment income −
2.1875)%
|
|
|
= (100% × (2% − 1.75%)) + 0%
|
|
|
= 100% × 0.25% + 0%
|
|
|
= 0.25%
|
Alternative 3
Assumptions
Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) =
3%
Hurdle rate(1) = 1.75%
Base management fee(2) = 0.50%
Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent,
etc.)(3) = 0.20%
Pre-incentive fee net investment income (investment
income (base management fee + other expenses)) =
2.30%
Pre-incentive net investment income exceeds hurdle rate,
therefore there is an income incentive fee payable by us to our
Investment Adviser.
|
|
|
Income incentive Fee
|
|
= 100% × Catch Up + the greater of 0% AND (20%
× (pre-incentive fee net investment income − 2.1875)%
|
|
|
= (100% × (2.1875% − 1.75%)) + the greater of 0%
AND
(20% × (2.30% − 2.1875%))
|
|
|
= (100% × 0.4375%) + (20% × 0.1125%)
|
|
|
= 0.4375% + 0.0225%
|
|
|
= 0.46%
|
Example 2: Capital Gains Incentive Fee:
Alternative 1
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: $20 million investment made
|
|
|
|
Year 2: Fair market value, or FMV of
investment determined to be $22 million
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents 7% annualized hurdle rate. |
|
(2) |
|
Re presents 2% annualized base management fee. |
|
(3) |
|
Excludes organizational and offering expenses. |
|
|
|
|
|
Year 3: FMV of investment determined to be
$17 million
|
|
|
|
Year 4: Investment sold for $21 million
|
The impact, if any, on the capital gains portion of the
incentive fee would be:
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 2: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 3: Decrease base amount on which the
second part of the incentive fee is calculated by
$3 million (unrealized capital depreciation)
|
|
|
|
Year 4: Increase base amount on which the
second part of the incentive fee is calculated by
$4 million ($1 million of realized capital gain and
$3 million reversal in unrealized capital depreciation)
|
67
Alternative 2
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: $20 million investment made
|
|
|
|
Year 2: FMV of investment determined to be
$17 million
|
|
|
|
Year 3: FMV of investment determined to be
$17 million
|
|
|
|
Year 4: FMV of investment determined to be
$21 million
|
|
|
|
Year 5: FMV of investment determined to be
$18 million
|
|
|
|
Year 6: Investment sold for $15 million
|
The impact, if any, on the capital gains portion of the
incentive fee would be:
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 2: Decrease base amount on which the
second part of the incentive fee is calculated by
$3 million (unrealized capital depreciation)
|
|
|
|
Year 3: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 4: Increase base amount on which the
second part of the incentive fee is calculated by
$3 million (reversal in unrealized capital depreciation)
|
|
|
|
Year 5: Decrease base amount on which the
second part of the incentive fee is calculated by
$2 million (unrealized capital depreciation)
|
|
|
|
Year 6: Decrease base amount on which the
second part of the incentive fee is calculated by
$3 million ($5 million of realized capital loss offset
by a $2 million reversal in unrealized capital depreciation)
|
Alternative 3
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: $20 million investment made in
company A, or Investment A, and $20 million investment made
in company B, or Investment B
|
|
|
|
Year 2: FMV of Investment A is determined to
be $21 million, and Investment B is sold for
$18 million
|
|
|
|
Year 3: Investment A is sold for
$23 million
|
The impact, if any, on the capital gains portion of the
incentive fee would be:
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 2: Decrease base amount on which the
second part of the incentive fee is calculated by
$2 million (realized capital loss on Investment B)
|
|
|
|
Year 3: Increase base amount on which the
second part of the incentive fee is calculated by
$3 million (realized capital gain on Investment A)
|
Alternative 4
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: $20 million investment made in
company A, or Investment A, and $20 million investment made
in company B, or Investment B
|
|
|
|
Year 2: FMV of Investment A is determined to
be $21 million, and FMV of Investment B is determined to be
$17 million
|
|
|
|
Year 3: FMV of Investment A is determined to
be $18 million, and FMV of Investment B is determined to be
$18 million
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
Year 4: FMV of Investment A is determined to
be $19 million, and FMV of Investment B is determined to be
$21 million
|
|
|
|
Year 5: Investment A is sold for
$17 million, and Investment B is sold for $23 million
|
The impact, if any, on the capital gains portion of the
incentive fee would be:
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 2: Decrease base amount on which the
second part of the incentive fee is calculated by
$3 million (unrealized capital depreciation on Investment B)
|
|
|
|
Year 3: Decrease base amount on which the
second part of the incentive fee is calculated by
$1 million ($2 million in unrealized capital
depreciation on Investment A and $1 million recovery in
unrealized capital depreciation on Investment B)
|
|
|
|
Year 4: Increase base amount on which the
second part of the incentive fee is calculated by
$3 million ($1 million recovery in unrealized capital
depreciation on Investment A and $2 million recovery in
unrealized capital depreciation on Investment B)
|
|
|
|
Year 5: Increase base amount on which the
second part of the incentive fee is calculated by
$1 million ($3 million realized capital gain on
Investment B offset by $3 million realized capital loss on
Investment A plus a $1 million reversal in unrealized
capital depreciation on Investment A from Year 4)
|
Payment
of our expenses
All investment professionals of the Investment Adviser and its
staff, when and to the extent engaged in providing investment
advisory and management services, and the compensation and
routine overhead expenses of such personnel allocable to such
services, will be provided and paid for by the Investment
Adviser. We bear all other costs and expenses of our operations
and transactions, including those relating to: organization and
offering; calculation of our net asset value (including the cost
and expenses of any independent valuation firm); expenses
incurred by Prospect Capital Management payable to third
parties, including agents, consultants or other advisers (such
as independent valuation firms, accountants and legal counsel),
in monitoring our financial and legal affairs and in monitoring
our investments and performing due diligence on our prospective
portfolio companies; interest payable on debt, if any, and
dividends payable on preferred stock, if any, incurred to
finance our investments; offerings of our debt, our preferred
shares, our common stock and other securities; investment
advisory fees; fees payable to third parties, including agents,
consultants or other advisors, relating to, or associated with,
evaluating and making investments; transfer agent and custodial
fees; registration fees; listing fees; taxes; independent
directors fees and expenses; costs of preparing and filing
reports or other documents with the SEC; the costs of any
reports, proxy statements or other notices to stockholders,
including printing costs; our allocable portion of the fidelity
bond, directors and officers/errors and omissions liability
insurance, and any other insurance premiums; direct costs and
expenses of administration, including auditor and legal costs;
and all other expenses incurred by us, by our Investment Adviser
or by Prospect Administration in connection with administering
our business, such as our allocable portion of overhead under
the Administration Agreement, including rent and our allocable
portion of the costs of our chief compliance officer and chief
financial officer and his staff, including the internal legal
staff.
Duration
and termination
The Investment Advisory Agreement was originally approved by our
Board of Directors on June 23, 2004 and was recently
re-approved by the Board of Directors on June 17, 2009 for
an additional one-year term expiring June 24, 2010. Unless
terminated earlier as described below, it will remain in effect
from year to year thereafter if approved annually by our Board
of Directors or by the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of our outstanding voting securities, including, in
either case, approval by a majority of our directors who are not
interested persons. The Investment Advisory Agreement will
automatically terminate in the event of its assignment. The
Investment Advisory Agreement may be terminated by either party
without penalty upon not more than 60 days
69
written notice to the other. See Risk factors
Risks Relating to Our Business We are dependent upon
Prospect Capital Managements key management personnel for
our future success.
Administration
Agreement
We have also entered into an Administration Agreement with
Prospect Administration under which Prospect Administration,
among other things, provides (or arranges for the provision of)
administrative services and facilities for us. For providing
these services, we reimburse Prospect Administration for our
allocable portion of overhead incurred by Prospect
Administration in performing its obligations under the
Administration Agreement, including rent and our allocable
portion of the costs of our chief compliance officer and chief
financial officer and his staff, including the internal legal
staff. Under this agreement, Prospect Administration furnishes
us with office facilities, equipment and clerical, bookkeeping
and record keeping services at such facilities. Prospect
Administration also performs, or oversees the performance of,
our required administrative services, which include, among other
things, being responsible for the financial records that we are
required to maintain and preparing reports to our stockholders
and reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
or the SEC. In addition, Prospect Administration assists us in
determining and publishing our net asset value, overseeing the
preparation and filing of our tax returns and the printing and
dissemination of reports to our stockholders, and generally
oversees the payment of our expenses and the performance of
administrative and professional services rendered to us by
others. Under the Administration Agreement, Prospect
Administration also provides on our behalf managerial assistance
to those portfolio companies to which we are required to provide
such assistance. The Administration Agreement may be terminated
by either party without penalty upon 60 days written
notice to the other party. Prospect Administration is a wholly
owned subsidiary of our Investment Adviser.
Prospect Administration previously engaged Vastardis
Fund Services LLC (Vastardis) to serve as our
sub-administrator
to perform certain services required of Prospect Administration.
On April 30, 2009 we gave a
60-day
notice to Vastardis of termination of our agreement for
Vastardis to provide
sub-administration
services effective June 30, 2009. We entered into a new
consulting services agreement for the period from July 1,
2009 until the filing of our
Form 10-K
for the year ended June 30, 2009. We paid Vastardis a total
of $30,000 for services rendered in conjunction with preparation
of
Form 10-K
under the new agreement. All administration services were
assumed by Prospect Administration effective September 14,
2009.
We reimbursed Prospect Administration $2.9 million,
$2.1 million and $0.5 million for the twelve months
ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and June 30,
2007, respectively, for services it provided to the Company at
cost.
Indemnification
The Investment Advisory Agreement provides that, absent willful
misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of
its duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties
and obligations, Prospect Capital Management and its officers,
managers, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and
any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to
indemnification from us for any damages, liabilities, costs and
expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees and amounts
reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of
Prospect Capital Managements services under the Investment
Advisory Agreement or otherwise as our investment adviser.
The Administration Agreement provides that, absent willful
misfeasance, bad faith or negligence in the performance of its
duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties and
obligations, Prospect Administration and its officers, managers,
partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and
any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to
indemnification from us for any damages, liabilities, costs and
expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees and amounts
reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of
Prospect Administrations services under the Administration
Agreement or otherwise as our administrator.
Under the
sub-administration
agreement (which, as described above, was terminated as of
June 30, 2009), Vastardis and its officers, partners,
agents, employees, controlling persons, members, and any other
person or entity affiliated with Vastardis, are not liable to
the Administrator or to us for any action taken or omitted to be
taken by Vastardis in connection with the performance of any of
its duties or obligations or otherwise as
sub-administrator
for the Administrator on our behalf. The agreement also provides
that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or
70
negligence in the performance of Vastardis duties or by
reason of the reckless disregard of Vastardis duties and
obligations, Vastardis and its officers, partners, agents,
employees, controlling persons, members, and any other person or
entity affiliated with Vastardis are entitled to indemnification
from the Administrator and us. All damages, liabilities, costs
and expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees and
amounts reasonably paid in settlement) incurred in or by reason
of any pending, threatened or completed action, suit,
investigation or other proceeding (including an action or suit
by or in the right of the Administrator or us or our security
holders) arising out of or otherwise based upon the performance
of any of Vastardis duties or obligations under the
agreement or otherwise as
sub-administrator
for the Administrator on our behalf.
Board
of Directors approval of the Investment Advisory
Agreement
On June 17, 2009, our Board of Directors voted unanimously
to renew the Investment Advisory Agreement for the
12-month
period ending June 24, 2010. In its consideration of the
Investment Advisory Agreement, the Board of Directors focused on
information it had received relating to, among other things:
(a) the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and
other services to be provided to us by Prospect Capital
Management; (b) comparative data with respect to advisory
fees or expense ratios paid by other business development
companies with similar investment objectives; (c) our
projected operating expenses; (d) the projected
profitability of Prospect Capital Management and any existing
and potential sources of indirect income to Prospect Capital
Management or Prospect Administration from their relationships
with us and the profitability of those relationships;
(e) information about the services to be performed and the
personnel performing such services under the Investment Advisory
Agreement; (f) the organizational capability and financial
condition of Prospect Capital Management and its affiliates and
(g) the possibility of obtaining similar services from
other third party service providers or through an internally
managed structure. In approving the renewal of the Investment
Advisory Agreement, the Board of Directors, including all of the
directors who are not interested persons, considered
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Nature, Quality and Extent of Services. The
Board of Directors considered the nature, extent and quality of
the investment selection process employed by Prospect Capital
Management. The Board of Directors also considered Prospect
Capital Managements personnel and their prior experience
in connection with the types of investments made by us. The
Board of Directors concluded that the services to be provided
under the Investment Advisory Agreement are generally the same
as those of comparable business development companies described
in the available market data.
|
|
|
|
Investment Performance. The Board of Directors
reviewed our investment performance as well as comparative data
with respect to the investment performance of other externally
managed business development companies. The Board of Directors
concluded that Prospect Capital Management was delivering
results consistent with our investment objective and that our
investment performance was satisfactory when compared to
comparable business development companies.
|
|
|
|
The reasonableness of the fees paid to Prospect Capital
Management. The Board of Directors considered
comparative data based on publicly available information on
other business development companies with respect to services
rendered and the advisory fees (including the management fees
and incentive fees) of other business development companies as
well as our projected operating expenses and expense ratio
compared to other business development companies. The Board of
Directors, on behalf of the Company, also considered the
profitability of Prospect Capital Management. Based upon its
review, the Board of Directors concluded that the fees to be
paid under the Investment Advisory Agreement are reasonable
compared to other business development companies.
|
|
|
|
Economies of Scale. The Board of Directors
considered information about the potential of Prospect Capital
Management to realize economies of scale in managing our assets,
and determined that at this time there were not economies of
scale to be realized by Prospect Capital Management.
|
Based on the information reviewed and the discussions detailed
above, the Board of Directors (including all of the directors
who are not interested persons) concluded that the
investment advisory fee rates and terms are fair and reasonable
in relation to the services provided and approved the renewal of
the Investment Advisory Agreement with Prospect Capital
Management as being in the best interests of the Company and its
stockholders.
71
Portfolio
Managers
The following individuals function as portfolio managers
primarily responsible for the
day-to-day
management of our portfolio. Our portfolio managers are not
responsible for
day-to-day
management of any other accounts. For a description of their
principal occupations for the past five years, see above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Length of Service
|
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
with Company (Years)
|
|
|
John F. Barry
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
5
|
|
M. Grier Eliasek
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
5
|
|
Mr. Eliasek receives no compensation from the Company.
Mr. Eliasek receives a salary and bonus from Prospect
Capital Management that takes into account his role as a senior
officer of the Company and of Prospect Capital Management, his
performance and the performance of each of Prospect Capital
Management and the Company. Mr. Barry receives no
compensation from the Company. Mr. Barry, as the sole
member of Prospect Capital Management, receives a salary
and/or bonus
from Prospect Capital Management and is entitled to equity
distributions after all other obligations of Prospect Capital
Management are met.
The following table sets forth the dollar range of our common
stock beneficially owned by each of the portfolio managers
described above as of June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Dollar Range of
|
|
|
Common Stock Beneficially
|
|
|
Owned by Prospect Capital
|
Name
|
|
Management
|
|
John F. Barry
|
|
Over $100,000
|
M. Grier Eliasek
|
|
Over $100,000
|
Managerial
Assistance
As a business development company, we offer, and must provide
upon request, managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio
companies. This assistance could involve, among other things,
monitoring the operations of our portfolio companies,
participating in board and management meetings, consulting with
and advising officers of portfolio companies and providing other
organizational and financial guidance. We billed $846,000,
$1,027,000, and $505,000 of managerial assistance fees for the
years ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008, and
June 30, 2007, respectively, of which $60,000 and $380,000
remains on the consolidated statement of assets and liabilities
as of June 30, 2009, and June 30, 2008, respectively.
These fees are paid to the Administrator so we simultaneously
accrue a payable to the Administrator for the same amounts,
which remain on the consolidated statements of assets and
liabilities.
License
Agreement
We entered into a license agreement with Prospect Capital
Management, pursuant to which Prospect Capital Management agreed
to grant us a nonexclusive, royalty free license to use the name
Prospect Capital. Under this agreement, we have a
right to use the Prospect Capital name, for so long as Prospect
Capital Management or one of its affiliates remains our
investment adviser. Other than with respect to this limited
license, we have no legal right to the Prospect Capital name.
This license agreement will remain in effect for so long as the
Investment Advisory Agreement with our Investment Adviser is in
effect.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS
We have entered into the Investment Advisory Agreement with
Prospect Capital Management. Our Chairman of the Board of
Directors is the sole member of and controls Prospect Capital
Management. Our senior management may in the future also serve
as principals of other investment managers affiliated with
Prospect Capital Management that may in the future manage
investment funds with investment objectives similar to ours. In
addition, our executive officers and directors and the
principals of Prospect Capital Management may serve as officers,
directors or principals of entities that operate in the same or
related lines of business as we do or of investment funds
managed by affiliates. Accordingly, we may not be given the
opportunity to participate in certain investments made by
investment funds managed by advisers affiliated with Prospect
Capital Management. However, our Investment Adviser and other
members of the affiliated present and predecessor companies of
Prospect Capital Management
72
intend to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and
equitable manner consistent with our investment objectives and
strategies so that we are not disadvantaged in relation to any
other client. See Risk Factors Risks Relating
To Our Business Potential conflicts of interest
could impact our investment returns.
In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Administration
Agreement, Prospect Administration provides, or arranges to
provide, the Company with the office facilities and
administrative services necessary to conduct our
day-to-day
operations. Prospect Capital Management is the sole member of
and controls Prospect Administration.
We have no intention of investing in any portfolio company in
which Prospect Capital Management or any affiliate currently has
an investment.
CONTROL
PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
As of February 25, 2010, there were no persons that owned
25% or more of our outstanding voting securities, and we believe
no person should be deemed to control us, as such term is
defined in the 1940 Act.
The following table sets forth, as of February 25, 2010,
certain ownership information with respect to our common stock
for those persons who directly or indirectly own, control or
hold with the power to vote, 5% or more of our outstanding
common stock and all officers and directors, as a group. Unless
otherwise indicated, we believe that the beneficial owners set
forth in the tables below have sole voting and investment power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Name and Address
|
|
Type of Ownership
|
|
Shares Owned
|
|
|
Outstanding(1)
|
|
|
Prospect Capital Management LLC(2)
|
|
Record and beneficial
|
|
|
968,251
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
%
|
All officers and directors as a group (6 persons)(3)
|
|
Record and beneficial
|
|
|
1,940,391
|
|
|
|
3.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Does not reflect shares of common stock reserved for issuance
upon any exercise of any underwriters overallotment option. |
|
(2) |
|
John F. Barry is a control person of Prospect Capital Management. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents shares of common stock held by Prospect Capital
Management. Because John F. Barry controls Prospect Capital
Management, he may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of
shares of our common stock held by Prospect Capital Management.
The address for all officers and directors is
c/o Prospect
Capital Corporation, 10 East 40th Street, 44th Floor, New York,
NY 10016. |
The following table sets forth the dollar range of our equity
securities beneficially owned by each of our directors and
officers as of December 31, 2009. We are not part of a
family of investment companies as that term is
defined in the 1940 Act.
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar Range of Equity
|
Name of Director or Officer
|
|
Securities in the Company(1)
|
|
Independent Directors
|
|
|
Graham D.S. Anderson
|
|
$50,001 $100,000
|
Andrew C. Cooper
|
|
None
|
Eugene S. Stark
|
|
$50,001 $100,000
|
Interested Directors
|
|
|
John F. Barry III(2)
|
|
Over $100,000
|
M. Grier Eliasek
|
|
Over $100,000
|
Officer
|
|
|
Brian H. Oswald
|
|
$50,001 $100,000
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dollar ranges are as follows: none, $1-$10,000, $10,001-$50,000,
$50,001-$100,000 or over $100,000. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents an indirect beneficial ownership in shares of our
common stock, that are beneficially owned directly by Prospect
Capital Management, by reason of Mr. Barrys position
as a control person of Prospect Capital Management. |
73
PORTFOLIO
COMPANIES
The following is a listing of our portfolio companies at
December 31, 2009. Values are as of December 31, 2009.
The portfolio companies are presented in three categories:
companies more than 25% owned are portfolio
companies in which Prospect directly or indirectly owns more
than 25% of the outstanding voting securities of such portfolio
company and, therefore, such portfolio company is presumed to be
controlled by us under the 1940 Act; companies owned 5% to
25% are portfolio companies where Prospect directly or
indirectly owns 5% to 25% of the outstanding voting securities
of such portfolio company
and/or holds
one or more seats on the portfolio companys Board of
Directors and, therefore, such portfolio company is deemed to be
an affiliated person with us under the 1940 Act; companies
less than 5% owned are portfolio companies where Prospect
directly or indirectly owns less than 5% of the outstanding
voting securities of such portfolio company and where it has no
other affiliations with such portfolio company. As of
December 31, 2009, Prospect owned 100.00% of the fully
diluted common equity of GSHI, 100.00% of the common equity of
CCEHI, 49.00% of the fully diluted common equity of Integrated,
79.83% of the fully diluted common equity of Iron Horse, 100.00%
of the members unit of AWCNC, LLC, 100.00% of the common equity
of Coalbed, Inc., 100.00% of the fully diluted equity of Freedom
Marine Holdings Inc., 79.40% of the fully diluted equity of
Nupla Corporation, 80.00% of the fully diluted common equity of
NRG, 40.00% of the fully diluted equity of Sidumpr Trailer
Company, Inc., 74.51% of the fully diluted equity of R-V, 78.11%
of the fully diluted common equity of Ajax and 100.00% of the
fully diluted common equity of Yatesville. Prospect makes
available significant managerial assistance to its portfolio
companies. Prospect generally requests and may receive rights to
observe the meetings of its portfolio companies Boards of
Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of its
|
|
Class of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Name of
|
|
Principal Business
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held, at
|
|
Loans, at
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
(Location)
|
|
Held
|
|
Collateral Held
|
|
Investment Structure
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Companies more than 25% owned
|
Ajax Rolled Ring and Machine
|
|
Manufacturing (South Carolina)
|
|
Senior secured debt, subordinated secured debt, preferred stock
and common equity
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares; Preferred shares; Senior secured note Tranche A,
10.50% due 4/01/2013; Subordinated secured note Tranche B,
11.50% plus 6.00% PIK due 4/01/2013; Subordinated secured note
Tranche B, 15.00% due 10/30/2010
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
AWCNC, LLC
|
|
Machinery (North Carolina)
|
|
Members Units
|
|
N/A
|
|
Members units
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
C&J Cladding LLC
|
|
Metal services (Texas)
|
|
Warrants
|
|
N/A loan repaid
|
|
Warrants, common shares, expiring 3/30/2014
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Change Clean Energy Holdings, Inc
|
|
Biomass power (Maine)
|
|
Common equity
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Coalbed, Inc./ Coalbed, LLC
|
|
Oil & Gas Production (Tennessee)
|
|
Senior secured debt and common equity
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares; Senior secured note, 14.50%, in non-accrual
status effective 10/21/2009 due 6/30/2010
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
Fischbein, LLC
|
|
Machinery (North Carolina)
|
|
Senior subordinated debt and membership interests
|
|
Second priority lien on all assets and stock
|
|
Membership interests; Senior subordinated debt, 12.00% plus
6.50% PIK due 5/01/2013
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Freedom Marine Services LLC
|
|
Shipping vessels (Louisiana)
|
|
Subordinated secured debt and net profit interest
|
|
Second priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Net profit interest, 22.50%; Subordinated secured note, 16.00%
PIK due 12/31/2011
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Gas gathering and processing (Texas)
|
|
Senior and junior secured debt and common equity
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares; Senior secured note, 18.00% due 12/22/2018;
Junior secured note, 18.00% due 12/23/2018
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of its
|
|
Class of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Name of
|
|
Principal Business
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held, at
|
|
Loans, at
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
(Location)
|
|
Held
|
|
Collateral Held
|
|
Investment Structure
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Integrated Contract Services, Inc.
|
|
Contracting (North Carolina)
|
|
Senior and junior secured debt, preferred stock and common equity
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares; Preferred shares; Senior and junior secured
notes, 7.00% plus 7.00% PIK plus 6.00% default interest, in
non-accrual
status effective 10/09/2007 past due; Senior demand note, 15.00%
due 12/31/2009
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.
|
|
Production services (Alberta, Canada)
|
|
Senior secured debt, bridge loan and common equity
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares; Bridge loan, 15.00% plus 3.00% PIK, in
non-accrual status effective 5/01/2009 due 12/31/2009; Senior
secured note, 15.00%, in non-accrual status effective 5/01/2009
due 12/31/2009
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
NRG Manufacturing, Inc.
|
|
Manufacturing (Texas)
|
|
Senior secured debt and common equity
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares; Senior secured note, 16.50% due 8/31/2011
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
Nupla Corporation
|
|
Home & Office Furnishings, Housewares & Durable
(California)
|
|
Revolving line of credit, senior secured debt, senior
subordinated debt, preferred stock and common equity
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares; Preferred shares; Revolving line of credit,
0.50%-7.25% plus 2.00% default interest due 9/04/2012; Senior
secured Term Loan A, 8.00% plus 2.00% default interest due
9/04/2012; Senior subordinated debt, 10.00% plus 5.00% PIK, in
non-accrual status effective 4/01/2009 due 3/04/2013
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
R-V Industries, Inc.
|
|
Manufacturing (Pennsylvania)
|
|
Warrants and common equity
|
|
N/A loan repaid
|
|
Common shares; Warrants, common shares, expiring 6/30/2017
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Sidumpr Trailer Company, Inc.
|
|
Automobile (Nebraska)
|
|
Revolving line of credit, senior secured debt, preferred stock
and common equity
|
|
First priority lien on all assets and stock
|
|
Common shares; Preferred shares; Revolving line of credit,
0.50%-7.25%, in non-accrual status effective 11/01/2008 due
1/10/2011; Senior secured Term Loan A, 7.25%, in non-accrual
status effective 11/01/2008 due 1/10/2011; Senior secured Term
Loan B, 8.75%, in non-accrual status effective 11/01/2008 due
1/10/2011; Senior secured Term Loan C, 16.50% PIK, in
non-accrual status effective 9/27/2008 due 7/10/2011; Senior
secured Term Loan D 7.25%, in non-accrual status effective
11/01/2008 due 7/10/2011
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Yatesville Coal Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Mining and coal production (Kentucky)
|
|
Senior and junior secured debt and common equity
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares; Senior secured note, 15.77% due 12/31/2010, in
non-accrual status effective 1/01/2009; Junior secured note,
15.77% due 12/31/2010, in
non-accrual
status effective 1/01/2009
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of its
|
|
Class of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Name of
|
|
Principal Business
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held, at
|
|
Loans, at
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
(Location)
|
|
Held
|
|
Collateral Held
|
|
Investment Structure
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Companies 5% to 25% owned
|
Appalachian Energy Holdings LLC
|
|
Construction services (West Virginia)
|
|
Senior secured debt, warrants and preferred units
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Preferred stock; Warrants, common shares, expiring 2/13/2016,
6/17/2018, 11/30/2018; Senior secured note Tranche A, 14.00%
plus 3.00% PIK plus 3.00% default interest non-accrual status
effective 11/01/2008 due 1/31/2011; Senior secured note Tranche
B, 14.00% plus 3.00% PIK 3.00% default interest non-accrual
status effective 11/01/2008, past due
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Biotronic NeuroNetwork
|
|
Healthcare (Michigan)
|
|
Senior secured debt and preferred stock
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Preferred shares; Senior secured note, 11.50% plus 1.00% PIK due
2/21/2013
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
27.0
|
|
Boxercraft Incorporated
|
|
Textiles & Leather (Georgia)
|
|
Revolving line of credit, senior secured debt, preferred stock
and common equity
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares; Preferred shares; Revolving line of credit, 0.50%
due 9/16/2013; Senior secured Term Loan A, 9.50%-10.50% due
9/16/2013; Senior secured Term Loan B, 10.00%-11.00% due
9/16/2013; Senior secured Term Loan C, 12.00% plus 6.50% PIK due
3/16/2014
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
KTPS Holdings LLC
|
|
Textiles & Leather (Colorado)
|
|
Revolving line of credit, senior secured debt and membership
interests
|
|
First priority lien on all assets and stock
|
|
Membership interests; Revolving line of credit, 0.50% due
1/31/2012; Senior secured Term Loan A, 10.50%-11.25% due
1/31/2012; Senior secured Term Loan B, 12.00% due 1/31/2012;
Senior secured Term Loan C 12.00% plus 6.00% PIK due 3/31/2012
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
Miller Petroleum, Inc.
|
|
Oil and gas production (Tennessee)
|
|
Warrants
|
|
N/A loan repaid
|
|
Warrants, expiring 5/04/2010 through 12/31/2014
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Smart, LLC
|
|
Diversified / Conglomerate Service (New York)
|
|
Membership interests
|
|
N/A
|
|
Membership interests
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Sports Helmets Holdings, LLC
|
|
Personal & Nondurable Consumer Products (New York)
|
|
Revolving line of credit, senior secured debt, senior
subordinated debt and common equity
|
|
First priority lien on all assets and stock
|
|
Common shares; Revolving line of credit, 0.50% due 12/14/2013;
Senior secured Term Loan A, 4.26%-6.00% due 12/14/2013; Senior
secured Term Loan B, 4.76%-6.50% due 12/14/2013; Senior
subordinated debt Series A, 12.00% plus 3.00% PIK due 6/14/2014;
Senior subordinated debt Series B, 10.00% plus 5.00% PIK due
6/14/2014
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
Companies less than 5% owned
|
ADAPCO, Inc.
|
|
Ecological (Florida)
|
|
Common equity
|
|
N/A
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Aircraft Fasteners International, LLC
|
|
Machinery (California)
|
|
Revolving line of credit, senior and junior secured debt and
convertible preferred stock
|
|
First priority lien on all assets and stock
|
|
Convertible preferred shares; Revolving line of credit, 0.50%
due 11/01/2012; Senior secured Term Loan, 3.92%-5.40% due
11/01/2012; Junior secured Term Loan, 12.00% plus 2.00% PIK due
5/01/2013
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
Allied Defense Group, Inc.
|
|
Aerospace & Defense (Virginia)
|
|
Common equity
|
|
N/A
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of its
|
|
Class of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Name of
|
|
Principal Business
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held, at
|
|
Loans, at
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
(Location)
|
|
Held
|
|
Collateral Held
|
|
Investment Structure
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
American Gilsonite Company
|
|
Specialty minerals (Utah)
|
|
Senior subordinated secured debt and membership interests
|
|
Second priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Membership interests; Senior subordinated secured note, 12.00%
plus 3.00% PIK due 3/14/2013
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
Arrowhead General Insurance Agency, Inc.
|
|
Insurance (California)
|
|
Junior secured debt
|
|
Second perfected priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Junior secured Term Loan, 10.25% plus 2.50% PIK due 2/08/2013
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Borga, Inc.
|
|
Mining, Steel, Iron and Non-Precious Metal and Coal Production
(California)
|
|
Revolving line of credit, senior secured debt and warrants
|
|
First priority lien on all assets and pledge of all stock
|
|
Warrants; Revolving line of credit, 0.50%-5.00% plus 3.00%
default interest due 5/06/2010; Senior secured Term Loan B,
8.50% plus 3.00% default interest due 5/06/2010; Senior secured
Term Loan C, 12.00% plus 4.00% PIK plus 3.00% default interest
due 5/06/2010
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Caleel & Hayden, LLC
|
|
Personal & Nondurable Consumer Products (Colorado)
|
|
Junior secured debt, senior subordinated debt, common equity and
options
|
|
First priority lien on all assets and stock
|
|
Options; Common shares; Junior secured Term Loan B, 9.75%-10.00%
due 11/10/2011; Senior subordinated debt, 12.00% plus 4.50% PIK
due 11/10/2012
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
Castro Cheese Company, Inc.
|
|
Food products (Texas)
|
|
Junior secured debt
|
|
Second priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Junior secured note, 11.00% plus 2.00% PIK due 2/28/2013
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
Copernicus Group
|
|
Healthcare (North Carolina)
|
|
Revolving line of credit, senior secured debt, senior
subordinated debt and preferred stock
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Preferred shares; Revolving line of credit, 0.50%-10.50% due
10/08/2013; Senior secured Term Loan A, 10.50%-11.50% due
10/08/2013; Senior subordinated debt, 12.00% plus 6.00%
PIK-10.00% plus 10.00% PIK due 4/08/2014
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
Custom Direct, Inc.
|
|
Printing & Publishing (Maryland)
|
|
Senior and junior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Senior secured Term Loan, 3.06% due 12/31/2013; Junior secured
Term Loan 6.31% due 12/31/2014
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Deb Shops, Inc.
|
|
Retail (Pennsylvania)
|
|
Second lien debt
|
|
Second priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Second lien note, 1.00% plus 13.00% PIK due 10/23/2014
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Diamondback Operating LP
|
|
Oil and gas production (Oklahoma)
|
|
Net profit interest
|
|
N/A loan repaid.
|
|
Net profit interest, 15.00%
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Dover Saddlery, Inc.
|
|
Retail (Massachusetts)
|
|
Common equity
|
|
N/A
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
EXL Acquisition Corporation
|
|
Electronics (South Carolina)
|
|
Revolving line of credit, Senior secured debt and common equity
|
|
First priority lien on all assets and stock
|
|
Common shares; Revolving line of credit, 0.50% due 3/15/2012;
Senior secured Term Loan A, 3.93%-5.50% due 3/15/2011; Senior
secured Term Loan B, 4.18%-5.75% due 3/15/2012; Senior secured
Term Loan C, 4.68%-6.25% due 3/15/2012; Senior secured Term Loan
D, 12.00% plus 3.00% PIK due 3/15/2012
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
Fairchild Industrial Products, Co.
|
|
Electronics (North Carolina)
|
|
Preferred stock and common equity
|
|
N/A
|
|
Common shares; Preferred shares
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
H&M Oil & Gas LLC
|
|
Oil and gas production (Texas)
|
|
Senior secured debt and net profit interest
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Net profit interest, 8.00%; Senior secured note, 13.00% due
6/30/2010
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
46.1
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of its
|
|
Class of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Name of
|
|
Principal Business
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held, at
|
|
Loans, at
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
(Location)
|
|
Held
|
|
Collateral Held
|
|
Investment Structure
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Hudson Products Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Mining, Steel, Iron and Non-Precious Metals and Coal Production
(Texas)
|
|
Senior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Senior secured Term Loan, 8.00% due 8/24/2015
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
IEC Systems LP/Advanced Rig Services LLC (ARS)
|
|
Oilfield fabrication (Texas)
|
|
Senior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Senior secured notes 12.00% plus 3.00% PIK due 11/20/2012
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
32.3
|
|
Impact Products, LLC
|
|
Machinery (Ohio)
|
|
Junior secured debt and senior subordinated debt
|
|
Second priority lien on all assets and stock
|
|
Junior secured Term Loan, 6.25%-8.25% due 9/09/2012; Senior
subordinated debt, 10.00% plus 5.00% PIK due 9/09/2012
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
Label Corp Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Printing & Publishing (Nebraska)
|
|
Senior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Senior secured Term Loan, 8.50% due 8/08/2014
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
LHC Holdings Corp.
|
|
Healthcare (Florida)
|
|
Revolving line of credit, senior secured debt, senior
subordinated debt and membership interests
|
|
First priority lien on all assets and stock
|
|
Membership interests; Revolving line of credit, 0.50% due
11/30/2012; Senior secured Term Loan A, 4.31%-5.75% due
11/30/2012; Senior subordinated debt, 12.00% plus 2.50% PIK due
5/31/2013
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
Mac & Massey Holdings, LLC
|
|
Food Products (Georgia)
|
|
Senior subordinated debt and common equity
|
|
Subordinated lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares; Senior subordinated debt, 10.00% plus 5.75% PIK
due 2/10/2013
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
Maverick Healthcare LLC
|
|
Healthcare (Arizona)
|
|
Second lien debt, preferred units and common units
|
|
Second priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Common units; Preferred units; Second lien debt, 12.50% plus
3.50% PIK due 4/30/2014
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
Northwestern Management Services, LLC
|
|
Healthcare (Florida)
|
|
Revolving line of credit, senior and junior secured debt and
common equity
|
|
First priority lien on all assets and stock
|
|
Common shares; Revolving line of credit, 0.50% due 12/13/2012;
Senior secured Term Loan A, 4.24%-5.75% due 12/13/2012; Senior
secured Term Loan B, 4.74%-6.25% due 12/13/2012; Junior secured
Term Loan, 12.00% plus 3.00% due 6/13/2013
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
Prince Mineral Company, Inc.
|
|
Metal Services and Minerals (New York)
|
|
Junior secured debt and senior subordinated debt
|
|
Second priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Junior secured Term Loan, 5.29%-7.00% due 12/21/2012; Senior
subordinated debt, 13.00% plus 1.00% due 7/21/2013
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
Qualitest Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
|
Pharmaceuticals (Alabama)
|
|
Second lien debt
|
|
Second priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Second lien debt, 7.78% due 4/30/2015
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
Regional Management Corp.
|
|
Financial services (South Carolina)
|
|
Second lien debt
|
|
Second priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Second lien debt, 13.00% plus 2.00% PIK due 6/29/2012
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
24.5
|
|
R-O-M Corporation
|
|
Manufacturing (Missouri)
|
|
Revolving line of credit, senior secured debt and senior
subordinated debt
|
|
First priority lien on all assets and stock
|
|
Revolving line of credit, 0.50% due 2/08/2013; Senior secured
Term Loan a, 3.00%-4.75% due 2/08/2013; Senior secured Term Loan
B, 4.50%-6.25% due 5/08/2013; Senior subordinated debt, 12.00%
plus 3.00% PIK due 8/08/2013
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
Shearers Foods, Inc.
|
|
Food products (Ohio)
|
|
Second lien debt and membership interests
|
|
Second priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Membership interests; Second lien debt, 15.00% due 10/31/2013
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of its
|
|
Class of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Name of
|
|
Principal Business
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held, at
|
|
Loans, at
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
(Location)
|
|
Held
|
|
Collateral Held
|
|
Investment Structure
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Stryker Energy LLC
|
|
Oil and gas production (Ohio)
|
|
Subordinated secured revolving credit facility and overriding
royalty interest
|
|
Second priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Overriding royalty interest; Subordinated secured revolving
credit facility, 12.00% due 12/01/2011
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
28.3
|
|
TriZetto Group
|
|
Healthcare (California)
|
|
Subordinated unsecured debt
|
|
Unsecured
|
|
Subordinated unsecured note, 12.00% plus 1.50% PIK due 10/01/2016
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
Unitek
|
|
Technical services (Pennsylvania)
|
|
Second lien debt
|
|
Second priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Second lien debt, 13.08% due 12/31/2013
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
Wind River Resources Corp. and Wind River II Corp.
|
|
Oil and gas production (Utah)
|
|
Senior secured debt and net profit interest
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Net profit interest, 5.00%; Senior secured note, 13.00% plus
3.00% default interest, in non-accrual status effective
12/01/2008 due 7/31/2010
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
DETERMINATION
OF NET ASSET VALUE
The net asset value per share of our outstanding shares of
common stock will be determined quarterly by dividing the value
of total assets minus liabilities by the total number of shares
outstanding.
In calculating the value of our total assets, we will value
investments for which market quotations are readily available at
such market quotations. Short-term investments which mature in
60 days or less, such as U.S. Treasury bills, are
valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. The
amortized cost method involves recording a security at its cost
(i.e., principal amount plus any premium and less any discount)
on the date of purchase and thereafter amortizing/accreting that
difference between the principal amount due at maturity and cost
assuming a constant yield to maturity as determined at the time
of purchase. Short-term securities which mature in more than
60 days are valued at current market quotations by an
independent pricing service or at the mean between the bid and
ask prices obtained from at least two brokers or dealers (if
available, or otherwise by a principal market maker or a primary
market dealer). Investments in money market mutual funds are
valued at their net asset value as of the close of business on
the day of valuation.
Most of the investments in our portfolio do not have market
quotations which are readily available, meaning the investments
do not have actively traded markets. Debt and equity securities
for which market quotations are not readily available are valued
with the assistance of an independent valuation service using a
documented valuation policy and a valuation process that is
consistently applied under the direction of our Board of
Directors. For a discussion of the risks inherent in determining
the value of securities for which readily available market
values do not exist, see Risk Factors Risks
Relating to Our Business Most of our portfolio
investments are recorded at fair value as determined in good
faith by our Board of Directors and, as a result, there is
uncertainty as to the value of our portfolio investments.
The factors that may be taken into account in valuing such
investments include, as relevant, the portfolio companys
ability to make payments, its estimated earnings and projected
discounted cash flows, the nature and realizable value of any
collateral, the financial environment in which the portfolio
company operates, comparisons to securities of similar publicly
traded companies, changes in interest rates for similar debt
instruments and other relevant factors. Due to the inherent
uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do
not have readily available market quotations, the fair value of
these investments may differ significantly from the values that
would have been used had such market quotations existed for such
investments, and any such differences could be material.
As part of the fair valuation process, the independent valuation
firm engaged by the Board of Directors performs a review of each
debt and equity investment and provides a range of values for
each investment, which, along with managements valuation
recommendations, is reviewed by the Audit Committee. Management
and the
79
independent valuation firm may adjust their preliminary
evaluations to reflect comments provided by the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee reviews the final valuation report and
managements valuation recommendations and makes a
recommendation to the Board of Directors based on its analysis
of the methodologies employed and the various weights that
should be accorded to each portion of the valuation as well as
factors that the independent valuation firm and management may
not have included in their evaluation processes. The Board of
Directors then evaluates the Audit Committee recommendations and
undertakes a similar analysis to determine the fair value of
each investment in the portfolio in good faith.
Determination of fair values involves subjective judgments and
estimates not susceptible to substantiation by auditing
procedures. Accordingly, under current accounting standards, the
notes to our financial statements will refer to the uncertainty
with respect to the possible effect of such valuations, and any
change in such valuations, on our financial statements.
SALES OF
COMMON STOCK BELOW NET ASSET VALUE
At our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders held on
February 12, 2009 and our 2009 annual meeting of
stockholders held on December 11, 2009, our stockholders
approved our ability to sell an unlimited number of shares of
our common stock at any level of discount from net asset value
(NAV) per share during the twelve-month period following such
approval. In order to sell shares pursuant to this authorization
a majority of our directors who have no financial interest in
the sale and a majority of our independent directors must
(a) find that the sale is in our best interests and in the
best interests of our stockholders, and (b) in consultation
with any underwriter or underwriters of the offering, make a
good faith determination as of a time either immediately prior
to the first solicitation by us or on our behalf of firm
commitments to purchase such shares, or immediately prior to the
issuance of such shares, that the price at which such shares are
to be sold is not less than a price which closely approximates
the market value of such shares, less any distributing
commission or discount. Any offering of common stock below NAV
per share will be designed to raise capital for investment in
accordance with our investment objective.
In making a determination that an offering below NAV per share
is in our and our stockholders best interests, our Board
of Directors would consider a variety of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
The effect that an offering below NAV per share would have on
our stockholders, including the potential dilution they would
experience as a result of the offering;
|
|
|
|
The amount per share by which the offering price per share and
the net proceeds per share are less than the most recently
determined NAV per share;
|
|
|
|
The relationship of recent market prices of par common stock to
NAV per share and the potential impact of the offering on the
market price per share of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
Whether the estimated offering price would closely approximate
the market value of our shares;
|
|
|
|
The potential market impact of being able to raise capital
during the current financial market difficulties;
|
|
|
|
The nature of any new investors anticipated to acquire shares in
the offering;
|
|
|
|
The anticipated rate of return on and quality, type and
availability of investments; and
|
|
|
|
The leverage available to us.
|
Our Board of Directors would also consider the fact that sales
of common stock at a discount will benefit our Advisor as the
Advisor will earn additional investment management fees on the
proceeds of such offerings, as it would from the offering of any
other securities of the Company or from the offering of common
stock at premium to NAV per share.
We will not sell shares under a prospectus supplement to the
registration statement or current post-effective amendment
thereto of which this prospectus forms a part (the current
registration statement) if the cumulative dilution to our
NAV per share from offerings under the current registration
statement exceeds 15%. This limit would be measured separately
for each offering pursuant to the current amendment by
calculating the percentage dilution
80
or accretion to aggregate NAV from that offering and then
summing the percentage from each offering. For example, if our
most recently determined NAV at the time of the first offering
is $10.06 and we have 64 million shares outstanding, sale
of 16 million shares at net proceeds to us of $5.03 per
share (a 50% discount) would produce dilution of 10.00%. If we
subsequently determined that our NAV per share increased to
$11.00 on the then 80 million shares outstanding and then
made an additional offering, we could, for example, sell
approximately an additional 8.885 million shares at net
proceeds to us of $5.50 per share, which would produce dilution
of 5.00%, before we would reach the aggregate 15% limit. If we
file a new post-effective amendment, the threshold would reset.
Sales by us of our common stock at a discount from NAV pose
potential risks for our existing stockholders whether or not
they participate in the offering, as well as for new investors
who participate in the offering.
The following three headings and accompanying tables will
explain and provide hypothetical examples on the impact of an
offering at a price less than NAV per share on three different
set of investors:
|
|
|
|
|
existing shareholders who do not purchase any shares in the
offering;
|
|
|
|
existing shareholders who purchase a relatively small amount of
shares in the offering or a relatively large amount of shares in
the offering; and
|
|
|
|
new investors who become shareholders by purchasing shares in
the offering.
|
Impact On
Existing Stockholders Who Do Not Participate in the
Offering
Our existing stockholders who do not participate in an offering
below NAV per share or who do not buy additional shares in the
secondary market at the same or lower price we obtain in the
offering (after expenses and commissions) face the greatest
potential risks. These stockholders will experience an immediate
decrease (often called dilution) in the NAV of the shares they
hold and their NAV per share. These stockholders will also
experience a disproportionately greater decrease in their
participation in our earnings and assets and their voting power
than the increase we will experience in our assets, potential
earning power and voting interests due to the offering. These
shareholders may also experience a decline in the market price
of their shares, which often reflects to some degree announced
or potential increases and decreases in NAV per share. This
decrease could be more pronounced as the size of the offering
and level of discounts increases.
The following chart illustrates the level of NAV dilution that
would be experienced by a nonparticipating stockholder in three
different hypothetical offerings of different sizes and levels
of discount from NAV per share. It is not possible to predict
the level of market price decline that may occur.
The examples assume that the issuer has 64,000,000 common shares
outstanding, $700,000,000 in total assets and $56,160,000 in
total liabilities. The current NAV and NAV per share are thus
$643,840,000 and $10.06. The chart illustrates the dilutive
effect on Stockholder A of (1) an offering of
3,200,000 shares (5% of the outstanding shares) at $9.56
per share after offering expenses and commission (a 5% discount
from NAV), (2) an offering of 6,400,000 shares (10% of
the outstanding shares) at $9.05 per share after offering
expenses and commissions (a 10% discount from NAV) and
(3) an offering of 12,800,000 shares (20% of the
outstanding shares) at $8.05 per share after offering expenses
and commissions (a 20% discount from NAV). The prospectus
supplement pursuant to which any discounted offering is made
will include a chart based on the actual number of shares in
such offering and the actual discount to the most recently
determined NAV, as applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example 1
|
|
|
Example 2
|
|
|
Example 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% Offering
|
|
|
10% Offering
|
|
|
20% Offering
|
|
|
|
Prior to
|
|
|
at 5% Discount
|
|
|
at 10% Discount
|
|
|
at 20% Discount
|
|
|
|
Sale Below
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
NAV
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Offering Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per Share to Public
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds per Share to Issuer
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease to NAV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
64,000,000
|
|
|
|
67,200,000
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
70,400,000
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
76,800,000
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
%
|
NAV per Share
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
10.04
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.97
|
|
|
|
(0.91
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example 1
|
|
|
Example 2
|
|
|
Example 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% Offering
|
|
|
10% Offering
|
|
|
20% Offering
|
|
|
|
Prior to
|
|
|
at 5% Discount
|
|
|
at 10% Discount
|
|
|
at 20% Discount
|
|
|
|
Sale Below
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
NAV
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Dilution to Nonparticipating Stockholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Percentage Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
|
(4.76
|
)%
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
|
|
(9.09
|
)%
|
|
|
0.08
|
%
|
|
|
(16.67
|
)%
|
Total NAV Held by Stockholder A
|
|
$
|
643,840
|
|
|
$
|
642,307
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
$
|
637,987
|
|
|
|
(0.91
|
)%
|
|
$
|
622,379
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
Total Investment by Stockholder A (Assumed to be $10.06 per
Share)
|
|
$
|
643,840
|
|
|
$
|
643,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
643,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
643,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dilution to Stockholder A (Total NAV Less Total Investment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,553
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5,853
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(21,461
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per Share Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment per Share Held by Stockholder A (Assumed to be $10.06
per Share on Shares Held Prior to Sale)
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per Share Held by Stockholder A (NAV per Share Less
Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Dilution to Stockholder A (Dilution per Share Divided
by Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.91
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
Impact On
Existing Stockholders Who Do Participate in the
Offering
Our existing stockholders who participate in an offering below
NAV per share or who buy additional shares in the secondary
market at the same or lower price as we obtain in the offering
(after expenses and commissions) will experience the same types
of NAV dilution as the nonparticipating stockholders, albeit at
a lower level, to the extent they purchase less than the same
percentage of the discounted offering as their interest in our
shares immediately prior to the offering. The level of NAV
dilution will decrease as the number of shares such stockholders
purchase increases. Existing stockholders who buy more than such
percentage will experience NAV dilution but will, in contrast to
existing stockholders who purchase less than their proportionate
share of the offering, experience an increase (often called
accretion) in NAV per share over their investment per share and
will also experience a disproportionately greater increase in
their participation in our earnings and assets and their voting
power than our increase in assets, potential earning power and
voting interests due to the offering. The level of accretion
will increase as the excess number of shares such stockholder
purchases increases. Even a stockholder who overparticipates
will, however, be subject to the risk that we may make
additional discounted offerings in which such stockholder does
not participate, in which case such a stockholder will
experience NAV dilution as described above in such subsequent
offerings. These shareholders may also experience a decline in
the market price of their shares, which often reflects to some
degree announced or potential increases and decreases in NAV per
share. This decrease could be more pronounced as the size of the
offering and level of discounts increases.
The following chart illustrates the level of dilution and
accretion in the hypothetical 20% discount offering from the
prior chart (Example 3) for a stockholder that acquires
shares equal to (1) 50% of its proportionate share of the
offering (i.e., 6,400 shares, which is 0.05% of an offering
of 12,800,000 shares) rather than its 0.10% proportionate
share and (2) 150% of such percentage (i.e.
19,200 shares, which is 0.15% of an offering of
12,800,000 shares rather than its 0.10% proportionate
share). The prospectus supplement pursuant to which any
discounted offering is made will include a chart for these
examples based on the actual number of shares in such offering
and the actual discount from the most recently determined NAV
per share, as applicable. It is not possible to predict the
level of market price decline that may occur.
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
150%
|
|
|
|
Prior to
|
|
|
Participation
|
|
|
Participation
|
|
|
|
Sale Below
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
NAV
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Offering Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per Share to Public
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds per Share to Issuer
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease/Increase to NAV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
64,000,000
|
|
|
|
76,800,000
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
%
|
|
|
76,800,000
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
%
|
NAV per Share
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
Dilution/Accretion to Participating Stockholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
70,400
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
83,200
|
|
|
|
30.00
|
%
|
Percentage Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
|
|
(8.33
|
)%
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
|
|
8.33
|
%
|
Total NAV Held by Stockholder A
|
|
$
|
643,840
|
|
|
$
|
684,617
|
|
|
|
6.33
|
%
|
|
$
|
809,092
|
|
|
|
25.67
|
%
|
Total Investment by Stockholder A (Assumed to be $10.06 per
Share on Shares held Prior to Sale)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
698,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
806,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dilution/Accretion to Stockholder A (Total NAV Less Total
Investment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13,441
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per Share Held by Stockholder A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment per Share Held by Stockholder A (Assumed to Be $10.06
on Shares Held Prior to Sale)
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
9.91
|
|
|
|
(1.44
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.69
|
|
|
|
(3.64
|
)%
|
Dilution/Accretion per Share Held by Stockholder A (NAV per
Share Less Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Dilution/Accretion to Stockholder A
(Dilution/Accretion per Share Divided by Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.93
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
%
|
Impact On
New Investors
Investors who are not currently stockholders and who participate
in an offering below NAV but whose investment per share is
greater than the resulting NAV per share due to selling
compensation and expenses paid by the issuer will experience an
immediate decrease, albeit small, in the NAV of their shares and
their NAV per share compared to the price they pay for their
shares. Investors who are not currently stockholders and who
participate in an offering below NAV per share and whose
investment per share is also less than the resulting NAV per
share due to selling compensation and expenses paid by the
issuer being significantly less than the discount per share will
experience an immediate increase in the NAV of their shares and
their NAV per share compared to the price they pay for their
shares. These investors will experience a disproportionately
greater participation in our earnings and assets and their
voting power than our increase in assets, potential earning
power and voting interests. These investors will, however, be
subject to the risk that we may make additional discounted
offerings in which such new stockholder does not participate, in
which case such new stockholder will experience dilution as
described above in such subsequent offerings. These investors
may also experience a decline in the market price of their
shares, which often reflects to some degree announced or
potential increases and decreases in NAV per share. This
decrease could be more pronounced as the size of the offering
and level of discounts increases.
The following chart illustrates the level of dilution or
accretion for new investors that would be experienced by a new
investor in the same hypothetical 5%, 10% and 20% discounted
offerings as described in the first chart above. The
illustration is for a new investor who purchases the same
percentage (0.10%) of the shares in the offering as Stockholder
A in the prior examples held immediately prior to the offering.
The prospectus supplement pursuant to which any discounted
offering is made will include a chart for these examples based
on the actual number of shares in such offering and the actual
discount from the most recently determined NAV per share, as
applicable. It is not possible to predict the level of market
price decline that may occur.
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example 1
|
|
|
Example 2
|
|
|
Example 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% Offering
|
|
|
10% Offering
|
|
|
20% Offering
|
|
|
|
Prior to
|
|
|
at 5% Discount
|
|
|
at 10% Discount
|
|
|
at 20% Discount
|
|
|
|
Sale Below
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Following
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
NAV
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Sale
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Offering Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per Share to Public
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds per Share to Issuer
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease/Increase to NAV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
64,000,000
|
|
|
|
67,200,000
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
70,400,000
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
76,800,000
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
%
|
NAV per Share
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
10.04
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.97
|
|
|
|
(0.91
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
(3.33
|
)%
|
Dilution/Accretion to New Investor A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held by Investor A
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Held by Investor A
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Total NAV Held by Investor A
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
32,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
63,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
124,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment by Investor A (At Price to Public)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
108,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dilution/Accretion to Investor A (Total NAV Less Total
Investment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per Share Held by Investor A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment per Share Held by Investor A
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution/Accretion per Share Held by Investor A (NAV per Share
Less Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Dilution/Accretion to Investor A (Dilution/Accretion
per Share Divided by Investment per Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.79
|
%
|
DIVIDEND
REINVESTMENT PLAN
We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan that provides for
reinvestment of our distributions on behalf of our stockholders,
unless a stockholder elects to receive cash as provided below.
As a result, when our Board of Directors authorizes, and we
declare, a cash dividend, then our stockholders who have not
opted out of our dividend reinvestment plan will
have their cash dividends automatically reinvested in additional
shares of our common stock, rather than receiving the cash
dividends.
No action is required on the part of a registered stockholder to
have their cash dividend reinvested in shares of our common
stock. A registered stockholder may elect to receive an entire
dividend in cash by notifying the plan administrator and our
transfer agent and registrar, in writing so that such notice is
received by the plan administrator no later than the record date
for dividends to stockholders. The plan administrator sets up an
account for shares acquired through the plan for each
stockholder who has not elected to receive dividends in cash and
hold such shares in non-certificated form. Upon request by a
stockholder participating in the plan, the plan administrator
will, instead of crediting shares to the participants
account, issue a certificate registered in the
participants name for the number of whole shares of our
common stock and a check for any fractional share. Such request
by a stockholder must be received three days prior to the
dividend payable date in order for that dividend to be paid in
cash. If such request is received less than three days prior to
the dividend payable date, then the dividends are reinvested and
shares are repurchased for the stockholders account;
however, future dividends are paid out in cash on all balances.
Those stockholders whose shares are held by a broker or other
financial intermediary may receive dividends in cash by
notifying their broker or other financial intermediary of their
election.
84
We primarily use newly issued shares to implement the plan,
whether our shares are trading at a premium or at a discount to
net asset value. However, we reserve the right to purchase
shares in the open market in connection with our implementation
of the plan. The number of shares to be issued to a stockholder
is determined by dividing the total dollar amount of the
dividend payable to such stockholder by the market price per
share of our common stock at the close of regular trading on The
NASDAQ Global Select Market on the valuation date for such
dividend. If we use newly-issued shares to implement the plan,
the valuation date will not be earlier than the last day that
stockholders have the right to elect to receive cash in lieu of
shares. Market price per share on that date will be the closing
price for such shares on The NASDAQ Global Select Market or, if
no sale is reported for such day, at the average of their
reported bid and asked prices. The number of shares of our
common stock to be outstanding after giving effect to payment of
the dividend cannot be established until the value per share at
which additional shares will be issued has been determined and
elections of our stockholders have been tabulated. Stockholders
who do not elect to receive dividends in shares of common stock
may experience accretion to the net asset value of their shares
if our shares are trading at a premium at the time we issue new
shares under the plan and dilution if our shares are trading at
a discount. The level of accretion or discount would depend on
various factors, including the proportion of our stockholders
who participate in the plan, the level of premium or discount at
which our shares are trading and the amount of the dividend
payable to a stockholder.
There are no brokerage charges or other charges to stockholders
who participate in the plan. The plan administrators fees
under the plan are paid by us. If a participant elects by
written notice to the plan administrator to have the plan
administrator sell part or all of the shares held by the plan
administrator in the participants account and remit the
proceeds to the participant, the plan administrator is
authorized to deduct a $15 transaction fee plus a $0.10 per
share brokerage commissions from the proceeds.
Stockholders who receive dividends in the form of stock are
subject to the same U.S. Federal, state and local tax
consequences as are stockholders who elect to receive their
dividends in cash. A stockholders basis for determining
gain or loss upon the sale of stock received in a dividend from
us will be equal to the total dollar amount of the dividend
payable to the stockholder. Any stock received in a dividend
will have a new holding period for tax purposes commencing on
the day following the day on which the shares are credited to
the U.S. stockholders account.
Participants may terminate their accounts under the plan by
notifying the plan administrator via its website at
www.amstock.com or by filling out the transaction request form
located at the bottom of their statement and sending it to the
plan administrator at American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, P.O. Box 922, Wall Street Station,
New York, NY
10269-0560
or by calling the plan administrators Interactive Voice
Response System at
(888) 888-0313.
The plan may be terminated by us upon notice in writing mailed
to each participant at least 30 days prior to any payable
date for the payment of any dividend by us. All correspondence
concerning the plan should be directed to the plan administrator
by mail at American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, 59 Maiden Lane, New York, NY 10007 or by
telephone at
(718) 921-8200.
Stockholders who purchased their shares through or hold their
shares in the name of a broker or financial institution should
consult with a representative of their broker or financial
institution with respect to their participation in our dividend
reinvestment plan. Such holders of our stock may not be
identified as our registered stockholders with the plan
administrator and may not automatically have their cash dividend
reinvested in shares of our common stock by the administrator.
MATERIAL
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following discussion is a general summary of the material
U.S. Federal income tax considerations applicable to us and
to an investment in our shares. This summary does not purport to
be a complete description of the income tax considerations
applicable to us or our investors on such an investment. For
example, we have not described tax consequences that we assume
to be generally known by investors or certain considerations
that may be relevant to certain types of holders subject to
special treatment under U.S. Federal income tax laws,
including stockholders subject to the alternative minimum tax,
tax-exempt organizations, insurance companies, dealers in
securities, pension plans and trusts, financial institutions,
U.S. stockholders (as defined below) whose functional
85
currency is not the U.S. dollar, persons who
mark-to-market
our shares and persons who hold our shares as part of a
straddle, hedge or
conversion transaction. This summary assumes that
investors hold our common stock as capital assets (within the
meaning of the Code). The discussion is based upon the Code,
Treasury regulations, and administrative and judicial
interpretations, each as of the date of this prospectus and all
of which are subject to change, possibly retroactively, which
could affect the continuing validity of this discussion. We have
not sought and will not seek any ruling from the Internal
Revenue Service, or the IRS, regarding this offering. This
summary does not discuss any aspects of U.S. estate or gift
tax or foreign, state or local tax. It does not discuss the
special treatment under U.S. Federal income tax laws that
could result if we invested in tax-exempt securities or certain
other investment assets.
A U.S. stockholder is a beneficial owner of
shares of our common stock that is for U.S. Federal income
tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or individual resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation, or other entity treated as a corporation for
U.S. Federal income tax purposes, created or organized in
or under the laws of the United States or any state thereof or
the District of Columbia;
|
|
|
|
an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. Federal
income taxation regardless of its source; or
|
|
|
|
a trust if (1) a U.S. court is able to exercise
primary supervision over the administration of such trust and
one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust or (2) it has a valid
election in place to be treated as a U.S. person.
|
A
Non-U.S. stockholder
is a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock that is not
a partnership and is not a U.S. stockholder.
If a partnership (including an entity treated as a partnership
for U.S. Federal income tax purposes) holds shares of our
common stock, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership
will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the
activities of the partnership. A prospective stockholder that is
a partner of a partnership holding shares of our common stock
should consult its tax advisors with respect to the purchase,
ownership and disposition of shares of our common stock.
Tax matters are very complicated and the tax consequences to an
investor of an investment in our shares will depend on the facts
of his, her or its particular situation. We encourage investors
to consult their own tax advisors regarding the specific
consequences of such an investment, including tax reporting
requirements, the applicability of U.S. Federal, state,
local and foreign tax laws, eligibility for the benefits of any
applicable tax treaty and the effect of any possible changes in
the tax laws.
Election
To Be Taxed As A RIC
As a business development company, we have qualified and elected
to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As a RIC,
we generally are not subject to
corporate-level U.S. Federal income taxes on any
ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute to our
stockholders as dividends. To qualify as a RIC, we must, among
other things, meet certain
source-of-income
and asset diversification requirements (as described below). In
addition, to obtain RIC tax treatment, we must distribute to our
stockholders, for each taxable year, at least 90% of our
investment company taxable income, which is
generally our ordinary income plus the excess of realized net
short-term capital gains over realized net long-term capital
losses, or the Annual Distribution Requirement.
Taxation
As A RIC
Provided that we qualify as a RIC and satisfy the Annual
Distribution Requirement, we will not be subject to
U.S. Federal income tax on the portion of our investment
company taxable income and net capital gain (which we define as
net long-term capital gains in excess of net short-term capital
losses) we timely distribute to stockholders. We will be subject
to U.S. Federal income tax at the regular corporate rates
on any income or capital gain not distributed (or deemed
distributed) to our stockholders.
86
We will be subject to a 4% non-deductible U.S. Federal
excise tax on certain undistributed income of RICs unless we
distribute in a timely manner an amount at least equal to the
sum of (1) 98% of our ordinary income for each calendar
year, (2) 98% of our capital gain net income for the
one-year period ending October 31 in that calendar year and
(3) any income realized, but not distributed, in preceding
years.
In December 2008, our Board of Directors elected to retain
excess profits generated in the quarter ended September 30,
2008 and pay a 4% excise tax on such retained earnings. We paid
$533,000 for the excise tax with the filing of our tax return in
March 2009.
In order to qualify as a RIC for U.S. Federal income tax
purposes, we must, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
qualify to be treated as a business development company or be
registered as a management investment company under the 1940 Act
at all times during each taxable year;
|
|
|
|
derive in each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income
from dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain
securities loans, gains from the sale or other disposition of
stock or other securities or currencies or other income derived
with respect to our business of investing in such stock,
securities or currencies and net income derived from an interest
in a qualified publicly traded partnership (as
defined in the Code) or the 90% Income Test; and
|
|
|
|
diversify our holdings so that at the end of each quarter of the
taxable year:
|
|
|
|
at least 50% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash
equivalents, U.S. Government securities, securities of
other RICs, and other securities if such other securities of any
one issuer do not represent more than 5% of the value of our
assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of
the issuer (which for these purposes includes the equity
securities of a qualified publicly traded
partnership); and
|
|
|
|
no more than 25% of the value of our assets is invested in the
securities, other than U.S. Government securities or
securities of other RICs, (i) of one issuer (ii) of
two or more issuers that are controlled, as determined under
applicable tax rules, by us and that are engaged in the same or
similar or related trades or businesses or (iii) of one or
more qualified publicly traded partnerships, or the
diversification tests.
|
To the extent that we invest in entities treated as partnerships
for U.S. Federal income tax purposes (other than a
qualified publicly traded partnership), we generally
must include the items of gross income derived by the
partnerships for purposes of the 90% Income Test, and the income
that is derived from a partnership (other than a qualified
publicly traded partnership) will be treated as qualifying
income for purposes of the 90% Income Test only to the extent
that such income is attributable to items of income of the
partnership which would be qualifying income if realized by us
directly. In addition, we generally must take into account our
proportionate share of the assets held by partnerships (other
than a qualified publicly traded partnership) in
which we are a partner for purposes of the diversification tests.
In order to meet the 90% Income Test, we may establish one or
more special purpose corporations to hold assets from which we
do not anticipate earning dividend, interest or other qualifying
income under the 90% Income Test. Any such special purpose
corporation would generally be subject to U.S. Federal
income tax, and could result in a reduced after-tax yield on the
portion of our assets held there.
We may be required to recognize taxable income in circumstances
in which we do not receive cash. For example, if we hold debt
obligations that are treated under applicable tax rules as
having original issue discount (such as debt instruments with
payment-in-kind
interest or, in certain cases, increasing interest rates or
issued with warrants), we must include in income each year a
portion of the original issue discount that accrues over the
life of the obligation, regardless of whether cash representing
such income is received by us in the same taxable year. Because
any original issue discount accrued will be included in our
investment company taxable income for the year of accrual, we
may be required to make a distribution to our stockholders in
order to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement, even
though we will not have received any corresponding cash amount.
Gain or loss realized by us from warrants acquired by us as well
as any loss attributable to the lapse of such warrants generally
will be treated as capital gain or loss. Such gain or loss
generally will be long-term or short-term, depending on how long
we held a particular warrant.
87
Although we do not presently expect to do so, we are authorized
to borrow funds and to sell assets in order to satisfy
distribution requirements. However, under the 1940 Act, we are
not permitted to make distributions to our stockholders while
our debt obligations and other senior securities are outstanding
unless certain asset coverage tests are met. See
Regulation Senior Securities. Moreover,
our ability to dispose of assets to meet our distribution
requirements may be limited by (1) the illiquid nature of
our portfolio
and/or
(2) other requirements relating to our status as a RIC,
including the diversification tests. If we dispose of assets in
order to meet the Annual Distribution Requirement or to avoid
the excise tax, we may make such dispositions at times that,
from an investment standpoint, are not advantageous.
If we fail to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement or
otherwise fail to qualify as a RIC in any taxable year, we will
be subject to tax in that year on all of our taxable income,
regardless of whether we make any distributions to our
stockholders. In that case, all of such income will be subject
to corporate-level U.S. Federal income tax, reducing
the amount available to be distributed to our stockholders. See
Failure To Obtain RIC Tax Treatment.
As a regulated investment company, we are not allowed to carry
forward or carry back a net operating loss for purposes of
computing our investment company taxable income in other taxable
years. Certain of our investment practices may be subject to
special and complex U.S. Federal income tax provisions that
may, among other things, (i) disallow, suspend or otherwise
limit the allowance of certain losses or deductions,
(ii) convert lower taxed long-term capital gain and
qualified dividend income into higher taxed short-term capital
gain or ordinary income, (iii) convert an ordinary loss or
a deduction into a capital loss (the deductibility of which is
more limited), (iv) cause us to recognize income or gain
without a corresponding receipt of cash, (v) adversely
affect the time as to when a purchase or sale of stock or
securities is deemed to occur, (vi) adversely alter the
characterization of certain complex financial transactions, and
(vii) produce income that will not be qualifying income for
purposes of the 90% Income Test. We will monitor our
transactions and may make certain tax elections in order to
mitigate the effect of these provisions.
As described above, to the extent that we invest in equity
securities of entities that are treated as partnerships for
U.S. Federal income tax purposes, the effect of such
investments for purposes of the 90% Income Test and the
diversification tests will depend on whether or not the
partnership is a qualified publicly traded
partnership (as defined in the Code). If the partnership
is a qualified publicly traded partnership, the net
income derived from such investments will be qualifying income
for purposes of the 90% Income Test and will be
securities for purposes of the diversification
tests. If the partnership, however, is not treated as a
qualified publicly traded partnership, then the
consequences of an investment in the partnership will depend
upon the amount and type of income and assets of the partnership
allocable to us. The income derived from such investments may
not be qualifying income for purposes of the 90% Income Test
and, therefore, could adversely affect our qualification as a
RIC. We intend to monitor our investments in equity securities
of entities that are treated as partnerships for
U.S. Federal income tax purposes to prevent our
disqualification as a RIC.
We may invest in preferred securities or other securities the
U.S. Federal income tax treatment of which may not be clear
or may be subject to recharacterization by the IRS. To the
extent the tax treatment of such securities or the income from
such securities differs from the expected tax treatment, it
could affect the timing or character of income recognized,
requiring us to purchase or sell securities, or otherwise change
our portfolio, in order to comply with the tax rules applicable
to RICs under the Code.
Taxation
Of U.S. Stockholders
Distributions by us generally are taxable to
U.S. stockholders as ordinary income or capital gains.
Distributions of our investment company taxable
income (which is, generally, our ordinary income plus
realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net
long-term capital losses) will be taxable as ordinary income to
U.S. stockholders to the extent of our current or
accumulated earnings and profits, whether paid in cash or
reinvested in additional common stock. For taxable years
beginning on or before December 31, 2010, to the extent
such distributions paid by us to noncorporate stockholders
(including individuals) are attributable to dividends from
U.S. corporations and certain qualified foreign
corporations, such distributions generally will be eligible for
taxation at rates applicable to long term capital gains
(currently a maximum tax rate of 15%) provided that we
88
properly designate such distribution as derived from
qualified dividend income and certain holding period
and other requirements are satisfied. In this regard, it is not
anticipated that a significant portion of distributions paid by
us will be attributable to qualified dividends and, therefore,
generally will not qualify for the long term capital gains.
Distributions of our net capital gains (which is generally our
realized net long-term capital gains in excess of realized net
short-term capital losses) properly designated by us as
capital gain dividends will be taxable to a
U.S. stockholder as long-term capital gains (currently at a
maximum rate of 15% in the case of individuals, trusts or
estates), regardless of the U.S. stockholders holding
period for his, her or its common stock and regardless of
whether paid in cash or reinvested in additional common stock.
Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings
and profits first will reduce a U.S. stockholders
adjusted tax basis in such stockholders common stock and,
after the adjusted basis is reduced to zero, will constitute
capital gains to such U.S. stockholder.
Although we currently intend to distribute any long-term capital
gains at least annually, we may in the future decide to retain
some or all of our long-term capital gains, but designate the
retained amount as a deemed distribution. In that
case, among other consequences, we will pay tax on the retained
amount, each U.S. stockholder will be required to include
his, her or its proportionate share of the deemed distribution
in income as if it had been actually distributed to the
U.S. stockholder, and the U.S. stockholder will be
entitled to claim a credit equal to his, her or its allocable
share of the tax paid thereon by us. The amount of the deemed
distribution net of such tax will be added to the
U.S. stockholders tax basis for his, her or its
common stock. Since we expect to pay tax on any retained capital
gains at our regular corporate tax rate, and since that rate is
in excess of the maximum rate currently payable by individuals
on long-term capital gains, the amount of tax that individual
stockholders will be treated as having paid and for which they
will receive a credit will exceed the tax they owe on the
retained net capital gain. Such excess generally may be claimed
as a credit against the U.S. stockholders other
U.S. Federal income tax obligations or may be refunded to
the extent it exceeds a stockholders liability for
U.S. Federal income tax. A stockholder that is not subject
to U.S. Federal income tax or otherwise required to file a
U.S. Federal income tax return would be required to file a
U.S. Federal income tax return on the appropriate form in
order to claim a refund for the taxes we paid. In order to
utilize the deemed distribution approach, we must provide
written notice to our stockholders prior to the expiration of
60 days after the close of the relevant taxable year. We
cannot treat any of our investment company taxable income as a
deemed distribution.
For purposes of determining (1) whether the Annual
Distribution Requirement is satisfied for any year and
(2) the amount of capital gain dividends paid for that
year, we may, under certain circumstances, elect to treat a
dividend that is paid during the following taxable year as if it
had been paid during the taxable year in question. If we make
such an election, the U.S. stockholder will still be
treated as receiving the dividend in the taxable year in which
the distribution is made. However, any dividend declared by us
in October, November or December of any calendar year, payable
to stockholders of record on a specified date in any such month
and actually paid during January of the following year, will be
treated as if it had been received by our U.S. stockholders
on December 31 of the year in which the dividend was declared.
If an investor purchases shares of our common stock shortly
before the record date of a distribution, the price of the
shares will include the value of the distribution and the
investor will be subject to tax on the distribution even though
it represents a return of his, her or its investment.
A U.S. stockholder generally will recognize taxable gain or
loss if the stockholder sells or otherwise disposes of his, her
or its shares of our common stock. Any gain arising from such
sale or disposition generally will be treated as long-term
capital gain or loss if the stockholder has held his, her or its
shares for more than one year. Otherwise, it would be classified
as short-term capital gain or loss. However, any capital loss
arising from the sale or disposition of shares of our common
stock held for six months or less will be treated as long-term
capital loss to the extent of the amount of capital gain
dividends received, or undistributed capital gain deemed
received, with respect to such shares. In addition, all or a
portion of any loss recognized upon a disposition of shares of
our common stock may be disallowed if other substantially
identical shares are purchased (whether through reinvestment of
distributions or otherwise) within 30 days before or after
the disposition. The ability to otherwise deduct capital losses
may be subject to other limitations under the code.
In general, individual U.S. stockholders currently are
subject to a maximum U.S. Federal income tax rate of 15% on
their net capital gain, or the excess of realized net long-term
capital gain over realized net short-term capital
89
loss for a taxable year, including a long-term capital gain
derived from an investment in our shares. Such rate is lower
than the maximum rate on ordinary income currently payable by
individuals. Corporate U.S. stockholders currently are
subject to U.S. Federal income tax on net capital gain at
the maximum 35% rate also applied to ordinary income.
Noncorporate stockholders with net capital losses for a year
(which we define as capital losses in excess of capital gains)
generally may deduct up to $3,000 of such losses against their
ordinary income each year; any net capital losses of a
noncorporate stockholder in excess of $3,000 generally may be
carried forward and used in subsequent years as provided in the
Code. Corporate stockholders generally may not deduct any net
capital losses for a year, but may carry back such losses for
three years or carry forward such losses for five years.
We will send to each of our U.S. stockholders, as promptly
as possible after the end of each calendar year, a notice
detailing, on a per share and per distribution basis, the
amounts includible in such U.S. stockholders taxable
income for such year as ordinary income and as long-term capital
gain. In addition, the U.S. Federal tax status of each
years distributions generally will be reported to the IRS
(including the amount of dividends, if any, eligible for the 15%
maximum rate). Distributions may also be subject to additional
state, local and foreign taxes depending on a
U.S. stockholders particular situation. Dividends
distributed by us generally will not be eligible for the
dividends-received deduction or the preferential rate applicable
to qualifying dividends.
We may be required to withhold U.S. Federal income tax, or
backup withholding, currently at a rate of 28% (until
January 1, 2011 when a higher rate of 31% will apply absent
Congressional action) from all taxable distributions to any
noncorporate U.S. stockholder (1) who fails to furnish
us with a correct taxpayer identification number or a
certificate that such stockholder is exempt from backup
withholding, or (2) with respect to whom the IRS notifies
us that such stockholder has failed to properly report certain
interest and dividend income to the IRS and to respond to
notices to that effect. An individuals taxpayer
identification number is his or her social security number.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax, and any amount
withheld may be refunded or credited against the
U.S. stockholders U.S. Federal income tax
liability, provided that proper information is timely
provided to the IRS.
Taxation
Of Non-U.S.
Stockholders
Whether an investment in the shares is appropriate for a
Non-U.S. stockholder
will depend upon that persons particular circumstances. An
investment in the shares by a
Non-U.S. stockholder
may have adverse tax consequences.
Non-U.S. stockholders
should consult their tax advisers before investing in our common
stock.
Distributions of our investment company taxable
income to
Non-U.S. stockholders
that are not effectively connected with a
U.S. trade or business carried on by the
Non-U.S. stockholder,
will generally be subject to withholding of U.S. Federal
income tax at a rate of 30% (or lower rate provided by an
applicable treaty) to the extent of our current and accumulated
earnings and profits. However, effective for taxable years
beginning before January 1, 2010, we generally will not be
required to withhold any amounts with respect to distributions
of
(i) U.S.-source
interest income that would not have been subject to withholding
of U.S. Federal income tax if they had been earned directly
by a
Non-U.S. stockholder,
and (ii) net short-term capital gains in excess of net
long-term capital losses that would not have been subject to
withholding of U.S. Federal income tax if they had been
earned directly by a
Non-U.S. stockholder,
in each case only to the extent that such distributions are
properly designated by us as interest-related
dividends or short-term capital gain
dividends, as the case may be, and certain other
requirements are met.
Actual or deemed distributions of our net capital gains to a
Non-U.S. stockholder,
and gains realized by a
Non-U.S. stockholder
upon the sale of our common stock, that are not effectively
connected with a U.S. trade or business carried on by the
Non-U.S. stockholder,
will generally not be subject to U.S. Federal withholding
tax and generally will not be subject to U.S. Federal
income tax unless the
Non-U.S. stockholder
is a nonresident alien individual and is physically present in
the United States for more than 182 days during the taxable
year and meets certain other requirements. However, withholding
of U.S. Federal income tax at a rate of 30% on capital
gains of nonresident alien individuals who are physically
present in the United States for more than the 182 day
period only applies in exceptional cases because any individual
present in the United States for more than 182 days during
the taxable year is generally treated as a resident for
U.S. income tax purposes; in that case, he or she would be
subject to
90
U.S. income tax on his or her worldwide income at the
graduated rates applicable to U.S. citizens, rather than
the 30% U.S. Federal withholding tax.
If we distribute our net capital gains in the form of deemed
rather than actual distributions (which we may do in the
future), a
Non-U.S. stockholder
will be entitled to a U.S. Federal income tax credit or tax
refund equal to the stockholders allocable share of the
tax we pay on the capital gains deemed to have been distributed.
In order to obtain the refund, the
Non-U.S. stockholder
must obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number and file
a U.S.
Federal income tax return even if the
Non-U.S. stockholder
would not otherwise be required to obtain a U.S. taxpayer
identification number or file a U.S. Federal income tax
return. Accordingly, investment in the shares may not be
appropriate for a
Non-U.S. stockholder.
Distributions of our investment company taxable
income and net capital gains (including deemed
distributions) to
Non-U.S. stockholders,
and gains realized by
Non-U.S. stockholders
upon the sale of our common stock that is effectively
connected with a U.S. trade or business carried on by
the
Non-U.S. stockholder
(or if an income tax treaty applies, attributable to a
permanent establishment in the United States), will
be subject to U.S. Federal income tax at the graduated
rates applicable to U.S. citizens, residents and domestic
corporations. Corporate
Non-U.S. stockholders
may also be subject to an additional branch profits tax at a
rate of 30% imposed by the Code (or lower rate provided by an
applicable treaty). In the case of a non-corporate
Non-U.S. stockholder,
we may be required to withhold U.S. Federal income tax from
distributions that are otherwise exempt from withholding tax (or
taxable at a reduced rate) unless the
Non-U.S. stockholder
certifies his or her foreign status under penalties of perjury
or otherwise establishes an exemption.
The tax consequences to a
Non-U.S. stockholder
entitled to claim the benefits of an applicable tax treaty may
differ from those described herein.
Non-U.S. stockholders
are advised to consult their own tax advisers with respect to
the particular tax consequences to them of an investment in our
shares.
A
Non-U.S. stockholder
who is a nonresident alien individual may be subject to
information reporting and backup withholding of
U.S. Federal income tax on dividends unless the
Non-U.S. stockholder
provides us or the dividend paying agent with an IRS
Form W-8BEN
(or an acceptable substitute form) or otherwise meets
documentary evidence requirements for establishing that it is a
Non-U.S. stockholder
or otherwise establishes an exemption from backup withholding.
Non-U.S. persons
should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the
U.S. Federal income tax and withholding tax, and state,
local and foreign tax consequences of an investment in the
shares.
Failure
To Obtain RIC Tax Treatment
If we were unable to obtain tax treatment as a RIC, we would be
subject to tax on all of our taxable income at regular corporate
rates. We would not be able to deduct distributions to
stockholders, nor would they be required to be made.
Distributions would generally be taxable to our stockholders as
ordinary dividend income (currently eligible for the 15% maximum
rate) to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and
profits. Subject to certain limitations under the Code,
corporate distributees would be eligible for the
dividends-received deduction.
Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings
and profits would be treated first as a return of capital to the
extent of the stockholders tax basis, and any remaining
distributions would be treated as a capital gain.
The discussion set forth herein does not constitute tax advice,
and potential investors should consult their own tax advisors
concerning the tax considerations relevant to their particular
situation.
91
DESCRIPTION
OF OUR CAPITAL STOCK
The following description is based on relevant portions of
the Maryland General Corporation Law and on our charter and
bylaws. This summary is not necessarily complete, and we refer
you to the Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter and
bylaws for a more detailed description of the provisions
summarized below.
Capital
Stock
Our authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares
of stock, par value $0.001 per share, all of which is initially
classified as common stock. Our common stock is traded on The
NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol PSEC.
There are no outstanding options or warrants to purchase our
stock. No stock has been authorized for issuance under any
equity compensation plans. Under Maryland law, our stockholders
generally are not personally liable for our debts or obligations.
Under our charter, our Board of Directors is authorized to
classify and reclassify any unissued shares of stock into other
classes or series of stock, and to authorize the issuance of
such shares, without obtaining stockholder approval. As
permitted by the Maryland General Corporation Law, our charter
provides that the Board of Directors, without any action by our
stockholders, may amend the charter from time to time to
increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or
the number of shares of stock of any class or series that we
have authority to issue.
The below table sets forth each class of our outstanding
securities as of February 25, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Held
|
|
|
Amount Outstanding
|
|
(1)
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
by the Company
|
|
|
Exclusive of Amount
|
|
Title of Class
|
|
Amount Authorized
|
|
|
or for its Account
|
|
|
Shown Under(3)
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
63,586,731
|
|
Common
Stock
All shares of our common stock have equal rights as to earnings,
assets, dividends and voting and, when they are issued, will be
duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.
Distributions may be paid to the holders of our common stock if,
as and when authorized by our Board of Directors and declared by
us out of funds legally available therefor. Shares of our common
stock have no preemptive, conversion or redemption rights and
are freely transferable, except where their transfer is
restricted by U.S. Federal and state securities laws or by
contract. In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding
up of us, each share of our common stock would be entitled to
share ratably in all of our assets that are legally available
for distribution after we pay all debts and other liabilities
and subject to any preferential rights of holders of our
preferred stock, if any preferred stock is outstanding at such
time. Each share of our common stock is entitled to one vote on
all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, including the
election of directors. Except as provided with respect to any
other class or series of stock, the holders of our common stock
will possess exclusive voting power. There is no cumulative
voting in the election of directors, which means that prior to
the issuance of preferred stock holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of common stock will elect all of our
directors, and holders of less than a majority of such shares
will be unable to elect any director.
Preferred
Stock
Our charter authorizes our Board of Directors to classify and
reclassify any unissued shares of stock into other classes or
series of stock, including preferred stock. Prior to issuance of
shares of each class or series, the Board of Directors is
required by Maryland law and by our charter to set the terms,
preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers,
restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other
distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of
redemption for each class or series. Thus, the Board of
Directors could authorize the issuance of shares of preferred
stock with terms and conditions which could have the effect of
delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change in
control that might involve a premium price for holders of our
common stock or otherwise be in their best interest. You should
note, however, that any issuance of preferred stock must comply
with the requirements of the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act requires,
among other things, that (1) immediately after issuance and
92
before any dividend or other distribution (other than in shares
of stock) is made with respect to our common stock and before
any purchase of common stock is made, such preferred stock
together with all other senior securities must not exceed an
amount equal to 50% of our total assets after deducting the
amount of such dividend, distribution or purchase price, as the
case may be, and (2) the holders of shares of preferred
stock, if any are issued, must be entitled as a class to elect
two directors at all times and to elect a majority of the
directors if dividends on such preferred stock become in arrears
by two years or more until all arrears are cured. Certain
matters under the 1940 Act require the separate vote of the
holders of any issued and outstanding preferred stock. For
example, holders of preferred stock would vote separately from
the holders of common stock on a proposal to operate other than
as an investment company. We believe that the availability for
issuance of preferred stock will provide us with increased
flexibility in structuring future financings and acquisitions.
Limitation
On Liability Of Directors And Officers; Indemnification And
Advance Of Expenses
Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its
charter a provision limiting the liability of its directors and
officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money
damages except for liability resulting from (a) actual
receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or
services or (b) active and deliberate dishonesty
established by a final judgment as being material to the cause
of action. Our charter contains such a provision which
eliminates directors and officers liability to the
maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, subject to the
requirements of the 1940 Act.
Our charter authorizes us, to the maximum extent permitted by
Maryland law and subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, to
obligate ourselves to indemnify any present or former director
or officer or any individual who, while serving as a director or
officer and at our request, serves or has served another
corporation, real estate investment trust, partnership, joint
venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a
director, officer, partner or trustee, from and against any
claim or liability to which that person may become subject or
which that person may incur by reason of his or her service in
any such capacity and to pay or reimburse their reasonable
expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding. Our
bylaws obligate us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland
law and subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, to
indemnify any present or former director or officer or any
individual who, while serving as a director or officer and at
our request, serves or has served another corporation, real
estate investment trust, partnership, joint venture, trust,
employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a director,
officer, partner or trustee and who is made, or threatened to be
made, a party to the proceeding by reason of his or her service
in any such capacity from and against any claim or liability to
which that person may become subject or which that person may
incur by reason of his or her service in any such capacity and
to pay or reimburse their reasonable expenses in advance of
final disposition of a proceeding. The charter and bylaws also
permit us to indemnify and advance expenses to any person who
served a predecessor of us in any of the capacities described
above and any of our employees or agents or any employees or
agents of our predecessor. In accordance with the 1940 Act, we
will not indemnify any person for any liability to which such
person would be subject by reason of such persons willful
misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard
of the duties involved in the conduct of his or her office.
Maryland law requires a corporation (unless its charter provides
otherwise, which our charter does not) to indemnify a director
or officer who has been successful, on the merits or otherwise,
in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is made, or
threatened to be made, a party by reason of his or her service
in that capacity. Maryland law permits a corporation to
indemnify its present and former directors and officers, among
others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and
reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with
any proceeding to which they may be made, or threatened to be
made, a party by reason of their service in those or other
capacities unless it is established that (a) the act or
omission of the director or officer was material to the matter
giving rise to the proceeding and (1) was committed in bad
faith or (2) was the result of active and deliberate
dishonesty, (b) the director or officer actually received
an improper personal benefit in money, property or services or
(c) in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or
officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission
was unlawful. However, under Maryland law, a Maryland
corporation may not indemnify for an adverse judgment in a suit
by or in the right of the corporation or for a judgment of
liability on the basis that a personal benefit was improperly
received, unless in either case a court orders indemnification,
and then only for expenses. In addition, Maryland law permits a
corporation to advance reasonable expenses to a director or
officer upon the
93
corporations receipt of (a) a written affirmation by
the director or officer of his or her good faith belief that he
or she has met the standard of conduct necessary for
indemnification by the corporation and (b) a written
undertaking by him or her or on his or her behalf to repay the
amount paid or reimbursed by the corporation if it is ultimately
determined that the standard of conduct was not met.
Our insurance policy does not currently provide coverage for
claims, liabilities and expenses that may arise out of
activities that a present or former director or officer of us
has performed for another entity at our request. There is no
assurance that such entities will in fact carry such insurance.
However, we note that we do not expect to request our present or
former directors or officers to serve another entity as a
director, officer, partner or trustee unless we can obtain
insurance providing coverage for such persons for any claims,
liabilities or expenses that may arise out of their activities
while serving in such capacities.
Provisions
Of The Maryland General Corporation Law And Our Charter And
Bylaws
Anti-takeover
Effect
The Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter and bylaws
contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a
potential acquiror to acquire us by means of a tender offer,
proxy contest or otherwise. These provisions are expected to
discourage certain coercive takeover practices and inadequate
takeover bids and to encourage persons seeking to acquire
control of us to negotiate first with our Board of Directors.
These provisions could have the effect of depriving stockholders
of an opportunity to sell their shares at a premium over
prevailing market prices by discouraging a third party from
seeking to obtain control of us. We believe that the benefits of
these provisions outweigh the potential disadvantages of
discouraging any such acquisition proposals because, among other
things, the negotiation of such proposals may improve their
terms.
Control
Share Acquisitions
The Maryland General Corporation Law under the Control Share Act
provides that control shares of a Maryland corporation acquired
in a control share acquisition have no voting rights except to
the extent approved by a vote of two-thirds of the votes
entitled to be cast on the matter. Shares owned by the acquiror,
by officers or by directors who are employees of the corporation
are excluded from shares entitled to vote on the matter. Control
shares are voting shares of stock which, if aggregated with all
other shares of stock owned by the acquiror or in respect of
which the acquiror is able to exercise or direct the exercise of
voting power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy),
would entitle the acquiror to exercise voting power in electing
directors within one of the following ranges of voting power:
|
|
|
|
|
one-tenth or more but less than one-third,
|
|
|
|
one-third or more but less than a majority, or
|
|
|
|
a majority or more of all voting power.
|
The requisite stockholder approval must be obtained each time an
acquiror crosses one of the thresholds of voting power set forth
above. Control shares do not include shares the acquiring person
is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously
obtained stockholder approval. A control share acquisition means
the acquisition of control shares, subject to certain exceptions.
A person who has made or proposes to make a control share
acquisition may compel the Board of Directors of the corporation
to call a special meeting of stockholders to be held within
50 days of demand to consider the voting rights of the
shares. The right to compel the calling of a special meeting is
subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including an
undertaking to pay the expenses of the meeting. If no request
for a meeting is made, the corporation may itself present the
question at any stockholders meeting.
If voting rights are not approved at the meeting or if the
acquiring person does not deliver an acquiring person statement
as required by the statute, then the corporation may repurchase
for fair value any or all of the control shares, except those
for which voting rights have previously been approved. The right
of the corporation to repurchase control shares is subject to
certain conditions and limitations, including, as provided in
our bylaws, compliance with the 1940 Act. Fair value is
determined, without regard to the absence of voting rights for
the
94
control shares, as of the date of the last control share
acquisition by the acquiror or of any meeting of stockholders at
which the voting rights of the shares are considered and not
approved. If voting rights for control shares are approved at a
stockholders meeting and the acquiror becomes entitled to vote a
majority of the shares entitled to vote, all other stockholders
may exercise appraisal rights. The fair value of the shares as
determined for purposes of appraisal rights may not be less than
the highest price per share paid by the acquiror in the control
share acquisition.
The Control Share Act does not apply (a) to shares acquired
in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if the corporation
is a party to the transaction or (b) to acquisitions
approved or exempted by the charter or bylaws of the corporation.
Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the Control Share
Act any and all acquisitions by any person of our shares of
stock. There can be no assurance that such provision will not be
amended or eliminated at any time in the future. However, we
will notify the Division of Investment Management at the SEC
prior to amending our bylaws to be subject to the Control Share
Act and will make such amendment only if the Board of Directors
determines that it would be in our best interests.
Business
Combinations
Under Maryland law, business combinations between a
Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder or an
affiliate of an interested stockholder are prohibited for five
years after the most recent date on which the interested
stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. These business
combinations include a merger, consolidation, share exchange or,
in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or
issuance or reclassification of equity securities. An interested
stockholder is defined as:
|
|
|
|
|
any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power
of the corporations shares; or
|
|
|
|
an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time
within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was
the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the
then outstanding voting stock of the corporation.
|
A person is not an interested stockholder under this statute if
the Board of Directors approved in advance the transaction by
which he otherwise would have become an interested stockholder.
However, in approving a transaction, the Board of Directors may
provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after
the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined
by the Board of Directors.
After the five-year prohibition, any business combination
between the Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder
generally must be recommended by the Board of Directors of the
corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least:
|
|
|
|
|
80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding
shares of voting stock of the corporation; and
|
|
|
|
two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting
stock of the corporation other than shares held by the
interested stockholder with whom or with whose affiliate the
business combination is to be effected or held by an affiliate
or associate of the interested stockholder.
|
These super-majority vote requirements do not apply if the
corporations common stockholders receive a minimum price,
as defined under Maryland law, for their shares in the form of
cash or other consideration in the same form as previously paid
by the interested stockholder for its shares.
The statute permits various exemptions from its provisions,
including business combinations that are exempted by the Board
of Directors before the time that the interested stockholder
becomes an interested stockholder. Our Board of Directors has
adopted a resolution that any business combination between us
and any other person is exempted from the provisions of the
Business Combination Act, provided that the business
combination is first approved by the Board of Directors,
including a majority of the directors who are not interested
persons as defined in the 1940 Act. This resolution, however,
may be altered or repealed in whole or in part at any time. If
this resolution is repealed, or the Board of Directors does not
otherwise approve a business combination, the statute may
discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and
increase the difficulty of consummating any offer.
95
Conflict
with 1940 Act
Our bylaws provide that, if and to the extent that any provision
of the Maryland General Corporation Law, including the Control
Share Act (if we amend our bylaws to be subject to such Act) and
the Business Combination Act, or any provision of our charter or
bylaws conflicts with any provision of the 1940 Act, the
applicable provision of the 1940 Act will control.
Classified
Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes of
directors serving staggered three-year terms. The current terms
of the first, second and third classes will expire in 2011, 2012
and 2010 respectively, and in each case, until their successors
are duly elected and qualify. Each year one class of directors
will be elected to the Board of Directors by the stockholders. A
classified board may render a change in control of us or removal
of our incumbent management more difficult. We believe, however,
that the longer time required to elect a majority of a
classified Board of Directors will help to ensure the continuity
and stability of our management and policies.
Election
of Directors
Our charter and bylaws provide that the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of stock
entitled to vote in the election of directors will be required
to elect a director. Under the charter, our Board of Directors
may amend the bylaws to alter the vote required to elect
directors.
Number
of Directors; Vacancies; Removal
Our charter provides that the number of directors will be set
only by the Board of Directors in accordance with our bylaws.
Our bylaws provide that a majority of our entire Board of
Directors may at any time increase or decrease the number of
directors. However, unless our bylaws are amended, the number of
directors may never be less than three nor more than eight. Our
charter provides that, at such time as we have three independent
directors and our common stock is registered under the Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, we elect to be
subject to the provision of Subtitle 8 of Title 3 of the
Maryland General Corporation Law regarding the filling of
vacancies on the Board of Directors. Accordingly, at such time,
except as may be provided by the Board of Directors in setting
the terms of any class or series of preferred stock, any and all
vacancies on the Board of Directors may be filled only by the
affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors in
office, even if the remaining directors do not constitute a
quorum, and any director elected to fill a vacancy will serve
for the remainder of the full term of the directorship in which
the vacancy occurred and until a successor is elected and
qualifies, subject to any applicable requirements of the 1940
Act.
Our charter provides that a director may be removed only for
cause, as defined in our charter, and then only by the
affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to
be cast in the election of directors.
Action
by Stockholders
The Maryland General Corporation Law provides that stockholder
action can be taken only at an annual or special meeting of
stockholders or (unless the charter provides for stockholder
action by less than unanimous written consent, which our charter
does not) by unanimous written consent in lieu of a meeting.
These provisions, combined with the requirements of our bylaws
regarding the calling of a stockholder-requested special meeting
of stockholders discussed below, may have the effect of delaying
consideration of a stockholder proposal until the next annual
meeting.
Advance
Notice Provisions for Stockholder Nominations and Stockholder
Proposals
Our bylaws provide that with respect to an annual meeting of
stockholders, nominations of persons for election to the Board
of Directors and the proposal of business to be considered by
stockholders may be made only (1) pursuant to our notice of
the meeting, (2) by the Board of Directors or (3) by a
stockholder who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has
complied with the advance notice procedures of the bylaws. With
respect to special meetings of stockholders, only the business
specified in our notice of the meeting may be brought before the
96
meeting. Nominations of persons for election to the Board of
Directors at a special meeting may be made only
(1) pursuant to our notice of the meeting, (2) by the
Board of Directors or (3) provided that the Board of
Directors has determined that directors will be elected at the
meeting, by a stockholder who is entitled to vote at the meeting
and who has complied with the advance notice provisions of the
bylaws.
The purpose of requiring stockholders to give us advance notice
of nominations and other business is to afford our Board of
Directors a meaningful opportunity to consider the
qualifications of the proposed nominees and the advisability of
any other proposed business and, to the extent deemed necessary
or desirable by our Board of Directors, to inform stockholders
and make recommendations about such qualifications or business,
as well as to provide a more orderly procedure for conducting
meetings of stockholders. Although our bylaws do not give our
Board of Directors any power to disapprove stockholder
nominations for the election of directors or proposals
recommending certain action, they may have the effect of
precluding a contest for the election of directors or the
consideration of stockholder proposals if proper procedures are
not followed and of discouraging or deterring a third party from
conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect its own slate of
directors or to approve its own proposal without regard to
whether consideration of such nominees or proposals might be
harmful or beneficial to us and our stockholders.
Calling
of Special Meetings of Stockholders
Our bylaws provide that special meetings of stockholders may be
called by our Board of Directors and certain of our officers.
Additionally, our bylaws provide that, subject to the
satisfaction of certain procedural and informational
requirements by the stockholders requesting the meeting, a
special meeting of stockholders will be called by the secretary
of the corporation upon the written request of stockholders
entitled to cast not less than a majority of all the votes
entitled to be cast at such meeting.
Approval
of Extraordinary Corporate Action; Amendment of Charter and
Bylaws
Under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation generally cannot
dissolve, amend its charter, merge, sell all or substantially
all of its assets, engage in a share exchange or engage in
similar transactions outside the ordinary course of business,
unless approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled
to cast at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on
the matter. However, a Maryland corporation may provide in its
charter for approval of these matters by a lesser percentage,
but not less than a majority of all of the votes entitled to be
cast on the matter. Our charter generally provides for approval
of charter amendments and extraordinary transactions by the
stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes
entitled to be cast on the matter.
Our charter also provides that certain charter amendments and
any proposal for our conversion, whether by merger or otherwise,
from a closed-end company to an open-end company or any proposal
for our liquidation or dissolution requires the approval of the
stockholders entitled to cast at least 80 percent of the
votes entitled to be cast on such matter. However, if such
amendment or proposal is approved by at least two-thirds of our
continuing directors (in addition to approval by our Board of
Directors), such amendment or proposal may be approved by a
majority of the votes entitled to be cast on such a matter. The
continuing directors are defined in our charter as
our current directors as well as those directors whose
nomination for election by the stockholders or whose election by
the directors to fill vacancies is approved by a majority of the
continuing directors then on the Board of Directors.
Our charter and bylaws provide that the Board of Directors will
have the exclusive power to make, alter, amend or repeal any
provision of our bylaws.
No
Appraisal Rights
Except with respect to appraisal rights arising in connection
with the Control Share Act discussed above, as permitted by the
Maryland General Corporation Law, our charter provides that
stockholders will not be entitled to exercise appraisal rights.
97
DESCRIPTION
OF OUR PREFERRED STOCK
In addition to shares of common stock, our charter authorizes
the issuance of preferred stock. If we offer preferred stock
under this prospectus, we will issue an appropriate prospectus
supplement. We may issue preferred stock from time to time in
one or more series, without stockholder approval. Our Board of
Directors is authorized to fix for any series of preferred stock
the number of shares of such series and the designation,
relative powers, preferences and rights, and the qualifications,
limitations or restrictions of such series; except that, such an
issuance must adhere to the requirements of the 1940 Act,
Maryland law and any other limitations imposed by law.
The 1940 Act requires, among other things, that
(1) immediately after issuance and before any distribution
is made with respect to common stock, the liquidation preference
of the preferred stock, together with all other senior
securities, must not exceed an amount equal to 50% of our total
assets (taking into account such distribution) and (2) the
holders of shares of preferred stock, if any are issued, must be
entitled as a class to elect two directors at all times and to
elect a majority of the directors if dividends on the preferred
stock are in arrears by two years or more.
For any series of preferred stock that we may issue, our Board
of Directors will determine and the prospectus supplement
relating to such series will describe:
|
|
|
|
|
the designation and number of shares of such series;
|
|
|
|
the rate and time at which, and the preferences and conditions
under which, any dividends will be paid on shares of such
series, the cumulative nature of such dividends and whether such
dividends have any participating feature;
|
|
|
|
any provisions relating to convertibility or exchangeability of
the shares of such series;
|
|
|
|
the rights and preferences, if any, of holders of shares of such
series upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our
affairs;
|
|
|
|
the voting powers of the holders of shares of such series;
|
|
|
|
any provisions relating to the redemption of the shares of such
series;
|
|
|
|
any limitations on our ability to pay dividends or make
distributions on, or acquire or redeem, other securities while
shares of such series are outstanding;
|
|
|
|
any conditions or restrictions on our ability to issue
additional shares of such series or other securities;
|
|
|
|
if applicable, a discussion of certain U.S. Federal income
tax considerations; and
|
|
|
|
any other relative power, preferences and participating,
optional or special rights of shares of such series, and the
qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof.
|
All shares of preferred stock that we may issue will be
identical and of equal rank except as to the particular terms
thereof that may be fixed by our Board of Directors, and all
shares of each series of preferred stock will be identical and
of equal rank except as to the dates from which cumulative
dividends thereon will be cumulative.
DESCRIPTION
OF OUR DEBT SECURITIES
We may issue debt securities in one or more series which, if
publicly offered, will be under an indenture to be entered into
between us and a trustee. The specific terms of each series of
debt securities we publicly offer will be described in the
particular prospectus supplement relating to that series. For a
complete description of the terms of a particular series of debt
securities, you should read both this prospectus and the
prospectus supplement relating to that particular series.
The prospectus supplement, which will accompany this prospectus,
will describe the particular series of debt securities being
offered by including:
|
|
|
|
|
the designation or title of the series of debt securities;
|
|
|
|
the total principal amount of the series of debt securities;
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
the percentage of the principal amount at which the series of
debt securities will be offered;
|
|
|
|
the date or dates on which principal will be payable;
|
|
|
|
the rate or rates (which may be either fixed or variable)
and/or the
method of determining such rate or rates of interest, if any;
|
|
|
|
the date or dates from which any interest will accrue, or the
method of determining such date or dates, and the date or dates
on which any interest will be payable;
|
|
|
|
the terms for redemption, extension or early repayment, if any;
|
|
|
|
the currencies in which the series of debt securities are issued
and payable;
|
|
|
|
the provision for any sinking fund;
|
|
|
|
any restrictive covenants;
|
|
|
|
any events of default;
|
|
|
|
whether the series of debt securities are issuable in
certificated form;
|
|
|
|
any provisions for defeasance or covenant defeasance;
|
|
|
|
any special U.S. Federal income tax implications,
including, if applicable, U.S. Federal income tax
considerations relating to original issue discount;
|
|
|
|
any provisions for convertibility or exchangeability of the debt
securities into or for any other securities;
|
|
|
|
whether the debt securities are subject to subordination and the
terms of such subordination;
|
|
|
|
the listing, if any, on a securities exchange;
|
|
|
|
the name and address of the trustee; and
|
|
|
|
any other terms.
|
The debt securities may be secured or unsecured obligations.
Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a
business development company, to issue debt only in amounts such
that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at
least 200% after each issuance of debt. Unless the prospectus
supplement states otherwise, principal (and premium, if any) and
interest, if any, will be paid by us in immediately available
funds.
DESCRIPTION
OF OUR WARRANTS
We may issue warrants to purchase shares of our common stock,
preferred stock or debt securities from time to time. Such
warrants may be issued independently or together with one of our
Securities and may be attached or separate from such securities.
We will issue each series of warrants under a separate warrant
agreement to be entered into between us and a warrant agent. The
warrant agent will act solely as our agent and will not assume
any obligation or relationship of agency for or with holders or
beneficial owners of warrants.
A prospectus supplement will describe the particular terms of
any series of warrants we may issue, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the title of such warrants;
|
|
|
|
the aggregate number of such warrants;
|
|
|
|
the price or prices at which such warrants will be issued;
|
|
|
|
the currency or currencies, including composite currencies, in
which the price of such warrants may be payable;
|
|
|
|
the number of shares of common stock, preferred stock or debt
securities issuable upon exercise of such warrants;
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
the price at which and the currency or currencies, including
composite currencies, in which the shares of common stock,
preferred stock or debt securities purchasable upon exercise of
such warrants may be purchased;
|
|
|
|
the date on which the right to exercise such warrants will
commence and the date on which such right will expire;
|
|
|
|
whether such warrants will be issued in registered form or
bearer form;
|
|
|
|
if applicable, the minimum or maximum amount of such warrants
which may be exercised at any one time;
|
|
|
|
if applicable, the number of such warrants issued with each
share of common stock, preferred stock or debt securities;
|
|
|
|
if applicable, the date on and after which such warrants and the
related shares of common stock, preferred stock or debt
securities will be separately transferable;
|
|
|
|
information with respect to book-entry procedures, if any;
|
|
|
|
if applicable, a discussion of certain U.S. Federal income
tax considerations; and
|
|
|
|
any other terms of such warrants, including terms, procedures
and limitations relating to the exchange and exercise of such
warrants.
|
We and the warrant agent may amend or supplement the warrant
agreement for a series of warrants without the consent of the
holders of the warrants issued thereunder to effect changes that
are not inconsistent with the provisions of the warrants and
that do not materially and adversely affect the interests of the
holders of the warrants.
Under the 1940 Act, we may generally only offer warrants
provided that (1) the warrants expire by their terms
within ten years; (2) the exercise or conversion price is
not less than the current market value at the date of issuance;
(3) our stockholders authorize the proposal to issue such
warrants, and our Board of Directors approves such issuance on
the basis that the issuance is in our best interests and the
best interest of our stockholders; and (4) if the warrants
are accompanied by other securities, the warrants are not
separately transferable unless no class of such warrants and the
securities accompanying them has been publicly distributed. The
1940 Act also provides that the amount of our voting securities
that would result from the exercise of all outstanding warrants
at the time of issuance may not exceed 25% of our outstanding
voting securities.
REGULATION
We are a closed-end, non-diversified investment company that has
filed an election to be treated as a business development
company under the 1940 Act and has elected to be treated as a
RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. The 1940 Act contains
prohibitions and restrictions relating to transactions between
business development companies and their affiliates (including
any investment advisers or
sub-advisers),
principal underwriters and affiliates of those affiliates or
underwriters and requires that a majority of the directors be
persons other than interested persons, as that term
is defined in the 1940 Act. In addition, the 1940 Act provides
that we may not change the nature of our business so as to cease
to be, or to withdraw our election as, a business development
company unless approved by a majority of our outstanding voting
securities.
We may invest up to 100% of our assets in securities acquired
directly from issuers in privately negotiated transactions. With
respect to such securities, we may, for the purpose of public
resale, be deemed an underwriter as that term is
defined in the Securities Act. Our intention is to not write
(sell) or buy put or call options to manage risks associated
with the publicly-traded securities of our portfolio companies,
except that we may enter into hedging transactions to manage the
risks associated with interest rate and other market
fluctuations. However, in connection with an investment or
acquisition financing of a portfolio company, we may purchase or
otherwise receive warrants to purchase the common stock of the
portfolio company. Similarly, in connection with an acquisition,
we may acquire rights to require the issuers of acquired
securities or their affiliates to repurchase them under certain
circumstances. We also do not intend to acquire securities
issued by any investment company that exceed the limits imposed
by the 1940 Act. Under these limits, except with respect to
money market funds we
100
generally cannot acquire more than 3% of the voting stock of any
registered investment company, invest more than 5% of the value
of our total assets in the securities of one investment company
or invest more than 10% of the value of our total assets in the
securities of more than one investment company. With regard to
that portion of our portfolio invested in securities issued by
investment companies, it should be noted that such investments
subject our stockholders indirectly to additional expenses. None
of these policies are fundamental and may be changed without
stockholder approval.
Qualifying
Assets
Under the 1940 Act, a business development company may not
acquire any asset other than assets of the type listed in
Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, which are referred to as
qualifying assets, unless, at the time the acquisition is made,
qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the companys
total assets. The principal categories of qualifying assets
relevant to our business are the following:
(1) Securities purchased in transactions not involving any
public offering from the issuer of such securities, which issuer
(subject to certain limited exceptions) is an eligible portfolio
company, or from any person who is, or has been during the
preceding 13 months, an affiliated person of an eligible
portfolio company, or from any other person, subject to such
rules as may be prescribed by the SEC. An eligible
portfolio company is defined in the 1940 Act and rules
adopted pursuant thereto as any issuer which:
(a) is organized under the laws of, and has its principal
place of business in, the United States;
(b) is not an investment company (other than a small
business investment company wholly owned by the business
development company) or a company that would be an investment
company but for exclusions under the 1940 Act for certain
financial companies such as banks, brokers, commercial finance
companies, mortgage companies and insurance companies; and
(c) satisfies any of the following:
1. does not have any class of securities with respect to
which a broker or dealer may extend margin credit;
2. is controlled by a business development company or a
group of companies including a business development company and
the business development company has an affiliated person who is
a director of the eligible portfolio company;
3. is a small and solvent company having total assets of
not more than $4 million and capital and surplus of not
less than $2 million;
4. does not have any class of securities listed on a
national securities exchange; or
5. has a class of securities listed on a national
securities exchange, but has an aggregate market value of
outstanding voting and non-voting common equity of less than
$250 million.
(2) Securities in companies that were eligible portfolio
companies when we made our initial investment if certain other
requirements are satisfied.
(3) Securities of any eligible portfolio company which we
control.
(4) Securities purchased in a private transaction from a
U.S. issuer that is not an investment company or from an
affiliated person of the issuer, or in transactions incident
thereto, if the issuer is in bankruptcy and subject to
reorganization or if the issuer, immediately prior to the
purchase of its securities was unable to meet its obligations as
they came due without material assistance other than
conventional lending or financing agreements.
(5) Securities of an eligible portfolio company purchased
from any person in a private transaction if there is no ready
market for such securities and we already own 60% of the
outstanding equity of the eligible portfolio company.
101
(6) Securities received in exchange for or distributed on
or with respect to securities described in (1) through
(4) above, or pursuant to the exercise of warrants or
rights relating to such securities.
(7) Cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities
or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less
from the time of investment.
In addition, a business development company must have been
organized and have its principal place of business in the United
States and must be operated for the purpose of making
investments in the types of securities described in (1), (2),
(3) or (4) above.
Managerial
Assistance to Portfolio Companies
In order to count portfolio securities as qualifying assets for
the purpose of the 70% test, the business development company
must either control the issuer of the securities or must offer
to make available to the issuer of the securities (other than
small and solvent companies described above) significant
managerial assistance; except that, where the business
development company purchases such securities in conjunction
with one or more other persons acting together, one of the other
persons in the group may make available such managerial
assistance. Making available significant managerial assistance
means, among other things, any arrangement whereby the business
development company, through its directors, officers or
employees, offers to provide, and, if accepted, does so provide,
significant guidance and counsel concerning the management,
operations or business objectives and policies of a portfolio
company.
Temporary
Investments
Pending investment in other types of qualifying
assets, as described above, our investments may consist of
cash, cash equivalents, including money market funds,
U.S. government securities or high quality debt securities
maturing in one year or less from the time of investment, which
we refer to, collectively, as temporary investments, so that 70%
of our assets are qualifying assets. Typically, we will invest
in money market funds, U.S. treasury bills or in repurchase
agreements that are fully collateralized by cash or securities
issued by the U.S. government or its agencies. A repurchase
agreement involves the purchase by an investor, such as us, of a
specified security and the simultaneous agreement by the seller
to repurchase it at an agreed upon future date and at a price
which is greater than the purchase price by an amount that
reflects an
agreed-upon
interest rate. There is no percentage restriction on the
proportion of our assets that may be invested in such repurchase
agreements. However, if more than 25% of our total assets
constitute repurchase agreements from a single counterparty, we
would not meet the diversification tests in order to qualify as
a RIC for U.S. Federal income tax purposes. Thus, we do not
intend to enter into repurchase agreements with a single
counterparty in excess of this limit. Our Investment Adviser
will monitor the creditworthiness of the counterparties with
which we enter into repurchase agreement transactions.
Senior
Securities
We are permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple
classes of indebtedness and one class of stock senior to our
common stock if our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act,
is at least equal to 200% immediately after each such issuance.
In addition, while any preferred stock or public debt securities
remain outstanding, we must make provisions to prohibit any
distribution to our stockholders or the repurchase of such
securities or shares unless we meet the applicable asset
coverage ratios after giving effect to such distribution or
repurchase. We may also borrow amounts up to 5% of the value of
our total assets for temporary or emergency purposes without
regard to asset coverage. For a discussion of the risks
associated with leverage, see Risk Factors.
Code of
Ethics
We, Prospect Capital Management and Prospect Administration have
each adopted a code of ethics pursuant to
Rule 17j-1
under the 1940 Act that establishes procedures for personal
investments and restricts certain personal securities
transactions. Personnel subject to each code may invest in
securities for their personal investment accounts, including
securities that may be purchased or held by us, so long as such
investments are made in accordance with the codes
requirements. For information on how to obtain a copy of each
code of ethics, see Available Information.
102
Investment
Concentration
Our investment objective is to generate both current income and
long-term capital appreciation through debt and equity
investments. While we are diversifying the portfolio, many of
our existing investments are in the energy and energy related
industries.
Compliance
Policies and Procedures
We and our Investment Adviser have adopted and implemented
written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent
violation of the U.S. Federal securities laws, and are
required to review these compliance policies and procedures
annually for their adequacy and the effectiveness of their
implementation, and to designate a Chief Compliance Officer to
be responsible for administering the policies and procedures.
Brian H. Oswald serves as our Chief Compliance Officer.
Proxy
Voting Policies and Procedures
We have delegated our proxy voting responsibility to Prospect
Capital Management. The Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures of
Prospect Capital Management are set forth below. The guidelines
are reviewed periodically by Prospect Capital Management and our
independent directors, and, accordingly, are subject to change.
Introduction. As an investment adviser
registered under the Advisers Act, Prospect Capital Management
has a fiduciary duty to act solely in the best interests of its
clients. As part of this duty, Prospect Capital Management
recognizes that it must vote client securities in a timely
manner free of conflicts of interest and in the best interests
of its clients.
These policies and procedures for voting proxies for Prospect
Capital Managements Investment Advisory clients are
intended to comply with Section 206 of, and
Rule 206(4)-6
under, the Advisers Act.
Proxy policies. These policies are designed to
be responsive to the wide range of subjects that may be the
subject of a proxy vote. These policies are not exhaustive due
to the variety of proxy voting issues that Prospect Capital
Management may be required to consider. In general, Prospect
Capital Management will vote proxies in accordance with these
guidelines unless: (1) Prospect Capital Management has
determined to consider the matter on a
case-by-case
basis (as is stated in these guidelines), (2) the subject
matter of the vote is not covered by these guidelines,
(3) a material conflict of interest is present, or
(4) Prospect Capital Management might find it necessary to
vote contrary to its general guidelines to maximize stockholder
value and vote in its clients best interests. In such
cases, a decision on how to vote will be made by the Proxy
Voting Committee (as described below). In reviewing proxy
issues, Prospect Capital Management will apply the following
general policies:
Elections of directors. In general, Prospect
Capital Management will vote in favor of the management-proposed
slate of directors. If there is a proxy fight for seats on the
Board of Directors or Prospect Capital Management determines
that there are other compelling reasons for withholding votes
for directors, the Proxy Voting Committee will determine the
appropriate vote on the matter. Prospect Capital Management
believes that directors have a duty to respond to stockholder
actions that have received significant stockholder support.
Prospect Capital Management may withhold votes for directors
that fail to act on key issues such as failure to implement
proposals to declassify boards, failure to implement a majority
vote requirement, failure to submit a rights plan to a
stockholder vote and failure to act on tender offers where a
majority of stockholders have tendered their shares. Finally,
Prospect Capital Management may withhold votes for directors of
non-U.S. issuers
where there is insufficient information about the nominees
disclosed in the proxy statement.
Appointment of auditors. Prospect Capital
Management believes that the Company remains in the best
position to choose the auditors and will generally support
managements recommendation.
Changes in capital structure. Changes in a
companys charter, articles of incorporation or by-laws may
be required by state or U.S. Federal regulation. In
general, Prospect Capital Management will cast its votes in
103
accordance with the Companys management on such proposal.
However, the Proxy Voting Committee will review and analyze on a
case-by-case
basis any proposals regarding changes in corporate structure
that are not required by state or U.S. Federal regulation.
Corporate restructurings, mergers and
acquisitions. Prospect Capital Management
believes proxy votes dealing with corporate reorganizations are
an extension of the investment decision. Accordingly, the Proxy
Voting Committee will analyze such proposals on a
case-by-case
basis.
Proposals affecting the rights of
stockholders. Prospect Capital Management will
generally vote in favor of proposals that give stockholders a
greater voice in the affairs of the Company and oppose any
measure that seeks to limit those rights. However, when
analyzing such proposals, Prospect Capital Management will weigh
the financial impact of the proposal against the impairment of
the rights of stockholders.
Corporate governance. Prospect Capital
Management recognizes the importance of good corporate
governance in ensuring that management and the Board of
Directors fulfill their obligations to the stockholders.
Prospect Capital Management favors proposals promoting
transparency and accountability within a company.
Anti-takeover measures. The Proxy Voting
Committee will evaluate, on a
case-by-case
basis, proposals regarding anti-takeover measures to determine
the measures likely effect on stockholder value dilution.
Stock splits. Prospect Capital Management will
generally vote with the management of the Company on stock split
matters.
Limited liability of directors. Prospect
Capital Management will generally vote with management on
matters that would affect the limited liability of directors.
Social and corporate responsibility. The Proxy
Voting Committee may review and analyze on a
case-by-case
basis proposals relating to social, political and environmental
issues to determine whether they will have a financial impact on
stockholder value. Prospect Capital Management may abstain from
voting on social proposals that do not have a readily
determinable financial impact on stockholder value.
Proxy voting procedures. Prospect Capital
Management will generally vote proxies in accordance with these
guidelines. In circumstances in which (1) Prospect Capital
Management has determined to consider the matter on a
case-by-case
basis (as is stated in these guidelines), (2) the subject
matter of the vote is not covered by these guidelines,
(3) a material conflict of interest is present, or
(4) Prospect Capital Management might find it necessary to
vote contrary to its general guidelines to maximize stockholder
value and vote in its clients best interests, the Proxy
Voting Committee will vote the proxy.
Proxy voting committee. Prospect Capital
Management has formed a proxy voting committee to establish
general proxy policies and consider specific proxy voting
matters as necessary. In addition, members of the committee may
contact the management of the Company and interested stockholder
groups as necessary to discuss proxy issues. Members of the
committee will include relevant senior personnel. The committee
may also evaluate proxies where we face a potential conflict of
interest (as discussed below). Finally, the committee monitors
adherence to guidelines, and reviews the policies contained in
this statement from time to time.
Conflicts of interest. Prospect Capital
Management recognizes that there may be a potential conflict of
interest when it votes a proxy solicited by an issuer that is
its advisory client or a client or customer of one of our
affiliates or with whom it has another business or personal
relationship that may affect how it votes on the issuers
proxy. Prospect Capital Management believes that adherence to
these policies and procedures ensures that proxies are voted
with only its clients best interests in mind. To ensure
that its votes are not the product of a conflict of interests,
Prospect Capital Management requires that: (i) anyone
involved in the decision making process (including members of
the Proxy Voting Committee) disclose to the chairman of the
Proxy Voting Committee any potential conflict that he or she is
aware of and any contact that he or she has had with any
interested party regarding a proxy vote; and (ii) employees
involved in the decision making process or vote
104
administration are prohibited from revealing how Prospect
Capital Management intends to vote on a proposal in order to
reduce any attempted influence from interested parties.
Proxy voting. Each accounts custodian
will forward all relevant proxy materials to Prospect Capital
Management, either electronically or in physical form to the
address of record that Prospect Capital Management has provided
to the custodian.
Proxy recordkeeping. Prospect Capital
Management must retain the following documents pertaining to
proxy voting:
|
|
|
|
|
copies of its proxy voting polices and procedures;
|
|
|
|
copies of all proxy statements;
|
|
|
|
records of all votes cast by Prospect Capital Management;
|
|
|
|
copies of all documents created by Prospect Capital Management
that were material to making a decision how to vote proxies or
that memorializes the basis for that decision; and
|
|
|
|
copies of all written client requests for information with
regard to how Prospect Capital Management voted proxies on
behalf of the client as well as any written responses provided.
|
All of the above-referenced records will be maintained and
preserved for a period of not less than five years from the end
of the fiscal year during which the last entry was made. The
first two years of records must be maintained at our office.
Proxy voting records. Clients may obtain
information about how Prospect Capital Management voted proxies
on their behalf by making a written request for proxy voting
information to: Compliance Officer, Prospect Capital Management
LLC, 10 East 40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, NY
10016.
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 imposes a variety of regulatory
requirements on publicly-held companies. In addition to our
Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers required
certifications as to the accuracy of our financial reporting, we
are also required to disclose the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures as well as report on our
assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting,
the latter of which must be audited by our independent
registered public accounting firm.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act also requires us to continually review
our policies and procedures to ensure that we remain in
compliance with all rules promulgated under the Act.
CUSTODIAN,
TRANSFER AND DIVIDEND PAYING AGENT AND REGISTRAR
Our Securities are held under a custody agreement by
U.S. Bank National Association. The address of the
custodian is: 1555 North Rivercenter Drive, MK-WI-5302,
Milwaukee, WI 53212, Attention: Mutual Fund Custody Account
Administrator, facsimile:
(866) 350-1430.
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company acts as
our transfer agent, dividend paying agent and registrar. The
principal business address of American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company is 59 Maiden Lane, New
York, NY 10007, telephone number:
(718) 921-8200.
BROKERAGE
ALLOCATION AND OTHER PRACTICES
Since we generally acquire and dispose of our investments in
privately negotiated transactions, we infrequently use brokers
in the normal course of our business. The aggregate amount of
brokerage commissions paid by us during the three most recent
fiscal years is $105,613. Subject to policies established by our
Board of Directors,
105
Prospect Capital Management is primarily responsible for the
execution of the publicly-traded securities portion of our
portfolio transactions and the allocation of brokerage
commissions.
Prospect Capital Management does not expect to execute
transactions through any particular broker or dealer, but seeks
to obtain the best net results for the Company, taking into
account such factors as price (including the applicable
brokerage commission or dealer spread), size of order,
difficulty of execution, and operational facilities of the firm
and the firms risk and skill in positioning blocks of
securities. While Prospect Capital Management generally seeks
reasonably competitive trade execution costs, the Company will
not necessarily pay the lowest spread or commission available.
Subject to applicable legal requirements, Prospect Capital
Management may select a broker based partly upon brokerage or
research services provided to it and the Company and any other
clients. In return for such services, we may pay a higher
commission than other brokers would charge if Prospect Capital
Management determines in good faith that such commission is
reasonable in relation to the services provided.
PLAN OF
DISTRIBUTION
We may sell the Securities pursuant to this prospectus and a
prospectus supplement in any of four ways (or in any
combination): (a) through underwriters or dealers;
(b) directly to a limited number of purchasers or to a
single purchaser, including existing stockholders in a rights
offering; (c) through agents; or (d) directly to our
stockholders and others through the issuance of transferable or
non-transferable rights to our stockholders. In the case of a
rights offering, the applicable prospectus supplement will set
forth the number of shares of our common stock issuable upon the
exercise of each right and the other terms of such rights
offering. We will not sell shares of common stock in a rights
offering to our stockholder at a price below NAV per share under
this prospectus. Any underwriter or agent involved in the offer
and sale of the Securities will also be named in the applicable
prospectus supplement. The Securities may be sold
at-the-market
to or through a market maker or into an existing trading market
for the securities, on an exchange or otherwise. The prospectus
supplement will set forth the terms of the offering of such
securities, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the name or names of any underwriters or agents and the amounts
of Securities underwritten or placed by each of them;
|
|
|
|
the offering price of the Securities and the proceeds to us and
any discounts, commissions or concessions allowed or reallowed
or paid to underwriters or agents; and
|
|
|
|
any securities exchanges on which the Securities may be listed.
|
In addition, pursuant to the terms of certain applicable
registration rights agreements entered into by us or that we may
enter into in the future, certain of our stockholders may resell
shares of our common stock under this prospectus and as
described in any related prospectus supplement.
We may use Securities to acquire investments in companies, the
terms of which will be further disclosed in a prospectus
supplement if such stock is issued in an offering hereunder.
Any offering price and any discounts or concessions allowed or
reallowed or paid to underwriters or agents may be changed from
time to time.
We may sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to
acquire our common stock, at a price below the current net asset
value of our common stock in certain circumstances, including if
(i)(1) the holders of a majority of our shares (or, if less, at
least 67% of a quorum consisting of a majority of our shares)
and a similar majority of the holders of our shares who are not
affiliated persons of us approve the sale of our common stock at
a price that is less than the current net asset value, and
(2) a majority of our Directors who have no financial
interest in the transaction and a majority of our independent
Directors (a) determine that such sale is in our and our
stockholders best interests and (b) in consultation
with any underwriter or underwriters of the offering, make a
good faith determination as of a time either immediately prior
to the first solicitation by us or on our behalf of firm
commitments to purchase such shares, or immediately prior to the
issuance of such shares, that the price at which such shares are
to be sold is not less than a price which closely approximates
the market value of such shares, less any distributing
commission or
106
discount or if (ii) a majority of the number of the
beneficial holders of our common stock entitled to vote at the
annual meeting, without regard to whether a majority of such
shares are voted in favor of the proposal, approve the sale of
our common stock at a price that is less than the current net
asset value per share. As stated above, we will not use this
prospectus to sell our common stock to our shareholders in a
rights offering at a price below current net asset value.
If underwriters are used in the sale of any Securities,
Securities acquired by the underwriters for their own account
may be resold from time to time in one or more transactions,
including negotiated transactions, at a fixed public offering
price or at varying prices determined at the time of sale. The
Securities may be either offered to the public through
underwriting syndicates represented by managing underwriters, or
directly by underwriters. Generally, any obligations by the
underwriters to purchase the Securities will be subject to
certain conditions precedent.
The maximum commission or discount to be received by any FINRA
member or independent broker-dealer will not exceed 8%. In
connection with any rights offering to our stockholders, we may
also enter into a standby underwriting arrangement with one or
more underwriters pursuant to which the underwriter(s) will
purchase our common stock remaining unsubscribed for after the
rights offering.
We may sell the Securities through agents from time to time. The
prospectus supplement will name any agent involved in the offer
or sale of the Securities and any commissions we pay to them.
Generally, any agent will be acting on a best efforts basis for
the period of its appointment.
Agents, dealers and underwriters may be entitled to
indemnification by us against certain civil liabilities,
including liabilities under the Securities Act or to
contribution with respect to payments which the agents or
underwriters may be required to make in respect thereof. Agents,
dealers and underwriters may be customers of, engage in
transactions with, or perform services for us in the ordinary
course of business.
We may enter into derivative transactions with third parties, or
sell Securities outside of this prospectus to third parties in
privately negotiated transactions. If the applicable prospectus
supplement indicates, in connection with those derivatives, the
third parties may sell Securities covered by this prospectus and
the applicable prospectus supplement, including in short sale
transactions. If so, the third party may use Securities pledged
by us or borrowed from us or others to settle those sales or to
close out any related open borrowings of stock, and may use
securities received from us in settlement of those derivatives
to close out any related open borrowings of stock. The third
party in such sale transactions will be an underwriter and, if
not identified in this prospectus, will be identified in the
applicable prospectus supplement (or a post-effective
amendment). We or one of our affiliates may loan or pledge
Securities to a financial institution or other third party that
in turn may sell the securities using this prospectus. Such
financial institution or third party may transfer its short
position to investors in our Securities or in connection with a
simultaneous offering of other Securities offered by this
prospectus or otherwise.
Any of our common stock sold pursuant to a prospectus supplement
will be listed on The NASDAQ Global Select Market, or another
exchange on which our common stock is traded.
In order to comply with the securities laws of certain states,
if applicable, the Securities offered hereby will be sold in
such jurisdictions only through registered or licensed brokers
or dealers. In addition, in certain states, the Securities may
not be sold unless they have been registered or qualified for
sale in the applicable state or an exemption from the
registration or qualification requirements is available and is
complied with.
LEGAL
MATTERS
Certain legal matters regarding the securities offered by this
prospectus will be passed upon for the Company by Skadden, Arps,
Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, NY, and Venable
LLP as special Maryland counsel.
107
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM
BDO Seidman, LLP is the independent registered public accounting
firm of the Company.
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form N-2,
together with all amendments and related exhibits, under the
Securities Act, with respect to our Securities offered by this
prospectus. The registration statement contains additional
information about us and the Securities being registered by this
prospectus. We file with or submit to the SEC annual, quarterly
and current periodic reports, proxy statements and other
information meeting the informational requirements of the
Exchange Act. This information and the information specifically
regarding how we voted proxies relating to portfolio securities
for the period ended June 30, 2009, are available free of
charge by contacting us at 10 East 40th Street,
44th floor, New York, NY 10016 or by telephone at toll-free
(888) 748-0702.
You may inspect and copy these reports, proxy statements and
other information, as well as the registration statement and
related exhibits and schedules, at the Public Reference Room of
the SEC at 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C.
20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public
Reference Room by calling the SEC at
(202) 551-8090
or by calling
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy
and information statements and other information filed
electronically by us with the SEC which are available on the
SECs Internet site at
http://www.sec.gov.
Copies of these reports, proxy and information statements and
other information may be obtained, after paying a duplicating
fee, by electronic request at the following
E-mail
address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SECs Public
Reference Section,
Washington, D.C. 20549-0102.
108
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
|
|
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
|
|
|
|
|
F-43
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
|
|
|
|
|
F-45
|
|
|
|
|
F-46
|
|
|
|
|
F-47
|
|
|
|
|
F-59
|
|
F-1
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Audited)
|
|
|
Assets (Note 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments at fair value (cost of $633,636 and $531,424,
respectively, Note 3) Control investments (cost of
$165,867 and $187,105, respectively)
|
|
$
|
191,898
|
|
|
$
|
206,332
|
|
Affiliate investments (cost of $68,052 and $33,544, respectively)
|
|
|
66,479
|
|
|
|
32,254
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments (cost of $399,717 and
$310,775, respectively)
|
|
|
389,758
|
|
|
|
308,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments at fair value
|
|
|
648,135
|
|
|
|
547,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in money market funds
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
3,844
|
|
|
|
9,942
|
|
Receivables for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net
|
|
|
5,723
|
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Other
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Due from Prospect Administration (Note 8)
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs, net
|
|
|
5,891
|
|
|
|
6,951
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
689,080
|
|
|
|
667,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility payable (Note 10)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
124,800
|
|
Dividend payable
|
|
|
25,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to Prospect Administration (Note 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
Due to Prospect Capital Management (Note 8)
|
|
|
7,412
|
|
|
|
5,871
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
8,039
|
|
|
|
2,381
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
51,603
|
|
|
|
134,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
$
|
637,477
|
|
|
$
|
532,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share (100,000,000 and
100,000,000 common shares authorized, respectively; 63,349,746
and 42,943,084 issued and outstanding, respectively)
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
Paid-in capital in excess of par
|
|
|
741,520
|
|
|
|
545,707
|
|
Under/(over) distributed net investment income
|
|
|
(14,326
|
)
|
|
|
24,152
|
|
Accumulated realized losses on investments
|
|
|
(104,279
|
)
|
|
|
(53,050
|
)
|
Unrealized appreciation on investments
|
|
|
14,499
|
|
|
|
15,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
$
|
637,477
|
|
|
$
|
532,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value Per Share
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
12.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Investment Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments (Net of foreign withholding tax of ($52),
$62, ($19), and $109, respectively)
|
|
$
|
5,052
|
|
|
$
|
5,075
|
|
|
$
|
9,643
|
|
|
$
|
11,797
|
|
Affiliate investments (Net of foreign withholding tax of $0, $0,
$0, and $0, respectively)
|
|
|
1,539
|
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
2,388
|
|
|
|
1,635
|
|
Non-control/non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
11,948
|
|
|
|
11,091
|
|
|
|
21,343
|
|
|
|
21,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
18,539
|
|
|
|
17,241
|
|
|
|
33,374
|
|
|
|
34,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
4,160
|
|
|
|
4,584
|
|
|
|
10,360
|
|
|
|
9,168
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividend income
|
|
|
4,170
|
|
|
|
4,665
|
|
|
|
10,388
|
|
|
|
9,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income: (Note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control/affiliate investments
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
Gain on Patriot acquisition (Note 2)
|
|
|
5,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
12,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income
|
|
|
6,174
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
6,638
|
|
|
|
13,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Income
|
|
|
28,883
|
|
|
|
22,213
|
|
|
|
50,400
|
|
|
|
58,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base management fee (Note 8)
|
|
|
3,176
|
|
|
|
2,940
|
|
|
|
6,385
|
|
|
|
5,763
|
|
Income incentive fee (Note 8)
|
|
|
4,231
|
|
|
|
2,990
|
|
|
|
7,311
|
|
|
|
8,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment advisory fees
|
|
|
7,407
|
|
|
|
5,930
|
|
|
|
13,696
|
|
|
|
14,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and credit facility expenses
|
|
|
1,995
|
|
|
|
1,965
|
|
|
|
3,369
|
|
|
|
3,483
|
|
Sub-administration fees (Including former Chief Financial
Officer and Chief Compliance Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
Legal fees
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
Valuation services
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
Audit, compliance and tax related fees
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
629
|
|
Allocation of overhead from Prospect Administration (Note 8)
|
|
|
840
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
1,680
|
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
Insurance expense
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
Directors fees
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Other general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
|
462
|
|
Tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
11,958
|
|
|
|
10,253
|
|
|
|
21,157
|
|
|
|
22,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
16,925
|
|
|
|
11,960
|
|
|
|
29,243
|
|
|
|
35,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized (loss) gain on investments
|
|
|
(51,229
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(51,229
|
)
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments
|
|
|
17,451
|
|
|
|
(5,452
|
)
|
|
|
(1,245
|
)
|
|
|
(16,601
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Decrease) Increase in Net Assets Resulting from
Operations
|
|
$
|
(16,853
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,524
|
|
|
$
|
(23,231
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations
per share: (Note 7)
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends/distributions declared per share:
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
For The
Six Months Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease) Increase in Net Assets from Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
29,243
|
|
|
$
|
35,462
|
|
Net realized (loss) gain on investments
|
|
|
(51,229
|
)
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
Net change in unrealized depreciation on investments
|
|
|
(1,245
|
)
|
|
|
(16,601
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Decrease) Increase in Net Assets Resulting from
Operations
|
|
|
(23,231
|
)
|
|
|
20,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends/Distributions to Shareholders:
|
|
|
(67,721
|
)
|
|
|
(23,848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Share Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from capital shares sold
|
|
|
98,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Offering costs of public share offerings
|
|
|
(1,158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of equity issued in conjunction with Patriot
acquisition
|
|
|
92,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinvestment of dividends/distributions
|
|
|
5,358
|
|
|
|
1,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share
Transactions
|
|
|
195,833
|
|
|
|
1,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Increase in Net Assets:
|
|
|
104,881
|
|
|
|
(1,820
|
)
|
Net assets at beginning of period
|
|
|
532,596
|
|
|
|
429,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets at End of Period
|
|
$
|
637,477
|
|
|
$
|
427,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Share Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares sold
|
|
|
11,431,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for Patriot acquisition
|
|
|
8,444,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued through reinvestment of dividends/distributions
|
|
|
530,797
|
|
|
|
117,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in capital share activity
|
|
|
20,406,662
|
|
|
|
117,549
|
|
Shares outstanding at beginning of period
|
|
|
42,943,084
|
|
|
|
29,520,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Outstanding at End of Period
|
|
|
63,349,746
|
|
|
|
29,637,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
(23,231
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,522
|
|
Net realized loss (gain) on investments
|
|
|
51,229
|
|
|
|
(1,661
|
)
|
Net change in unrealized depreciation on investments
|
|
|
1,245
|
|
|
|
16,601
|
|
Accretion of original issue discount on investments
|
|
|
(6,670
|
)
|
|
|
(2,128
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
Gain on settlement of net profits interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,576
|
)
|
Gain on Patriot acquisition
|
|
|
(5,714
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for purchases of investments
|
|
|
(7,321
|
)
|
|
|
(70,513
|
)
|
Payment-in-kind
interest
|
|
|
(2,059
|
)
|
|
|
(931
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of investments and collection of investment
principal
|
|
|
69,735
|
|
|
|
13,077
|
|
Purchases of cash equivalents
|
|
|
(199,997
|
)
|
|
|
(19,999
|
)
|
Sales of cash equivalents
|
|
|
199,997
|
|
|
|
19,999
|
|
Net decrease investments in money market funds
|
|
|
75,317
|
|
|
|
10,394
|
|
Decrease (increase) in interest receivable
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
(336
|
)
|
Decrease in dividends receivable
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
4,229
|
|
Decrease in loan principal receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Increase in receivable for managerial assistance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Increase in receivable for potential deal expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in other receivables
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Increase in prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(505
|
)
|
Decrease in due from Prospect Administration
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in other assets
|
|
|
(535
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in due to Prospect Administration
|
|
|
(842
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in due to Prospect Capital Management
|
|
|
1,541
|
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
997
|
|
Decrease in other liabilities
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities:
|
|
|
155,128
|
|
|
|
(23,126
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Patriot, net of cash acquired (Note 2)
|
|
|
(106,586
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities:
|
|
|
(106,586
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under credit facility
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
54,500
|
|
Payments under credit facility
|
|
|
(174,800
|
)
|
|
|
(7,000
|
)
|
Financing costs paid and deferred
|
|
|
(1,046
|
)
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
98,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering costs from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
(1,158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends/distributions paid
|
|
|
(36,469
|
)
|
|
|
(22,221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities:
|
|
|
54,640
|
|
|
|
25,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (Decrease) Increase in Cash
|
|
|
(6,098
|
)
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
Cash balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
9,942
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Balance at End of Period
|
|
$
|
3,844
|
|
|
$
|
2,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Paid For Interest
|
|
$
|
496
|
|
|
$
|
2,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Financing Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of shares issued in connection with Patriot
acquisition
|
|
$
|
92,800
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of shares issued in connection with dividend
reinvestment plan
|
|
$
|
5,358
|
|
|
$
|
2,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Locale / Industry
|
|
Investments(1)
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
LEVEL 3 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control Investments (25.00% or greater of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ajax Rolled Ring & Machine, Inc.
|
|
South Carolina/Manufacturing
|
|
Senior Secured Note Tranche A (10.50%, due
4/01/2013)(3),(4)
|
|
$
|
21,266
|
|
|
$
|
21,266
|
|
|
$
|
21,266
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Secured Note Tranche B (11.50%
plus 6.00% PIK,
due 4/01/2013)(3),(4)
|
|
|
12,038
|
|
|
|
12,038
|
|
|
|
4,536
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Secured Note Tranche B (15.00%,
due 10/30/2010)
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Preferred Stock Series A
(6,143 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted Common Stock (6 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,861
|
|
|
|
25,802
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AWCNC, LLC(20)
|
|
North Carolina/Machinery
|
|
Members Units Class A (1,800,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Members Units
Class B-1
(1 unit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Members Units
Class B-2
(7,999,999 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C&J Cladding LLC
|
|
Texas/Metal Services and Minerals
|
|
Warrants (400 warrants, expiring 3/30/2014)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
3,095
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
3,095
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. (CCEHI)(5)
|
|
Maine/Biomass Power
|
|
Common Stock (1,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,825
|
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,825
|
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coalbed, Inc./Coalbed, LLC(6)
|
|
Tennessee/Oil & Gas Production
|
|
Senior Secured Note (14.50%, in non-accrual status effective
10/21/2009, due 6/30/2010)
|
|
|
10,441
|
|
|
|
10,441
|
|
|
|
3,686
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (1,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,441
|
|
|
|
3,686
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fischbein, LLC
|
|
North Carolina/Machinery
|
|
Senior Subordinated Debt (12.00% plus 6.50% PIK, due 5/01/2013)
|
|
|
3,707
|
|
|
|
3,508
|
|
|
|
3,515
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Membership Interest Class A
(2,800,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,877
|
|
|
|
1,876
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,385
|
|
|
|
5,391
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freedom Marine Services LLC
|
|
Louisiana/Shipping Vessels
|
|
Subordinated Secured Note (16.00% PIK, due 12/31/2011)(3)
|
|
|
7,960
|
|
|
|
7,899
|
|
|
|
6,181
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Net Profits Interest (22.50% payable on Equity
distributions)(3),(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,899
|
|
|
|
6,181
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.(8)
|
|
Texas/Gas Gathering and Processing
|
|
Senior Secured Note (18.00%, due 12/22/2018)(3)
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Secured Note (18.00%, due 12/23/2018)(3)
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (100 shares)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,003
|
|
|
|
55,187
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,003
|
|
|
|
85,187
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated Contract Services, Inc.(9)
|
|
North Carolina/Contracting
|
|
Senior Demand Note (15.00%, due 12/31/2009)(10)
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Note (7.00% plus 7.00% PIK plus 6.00% default
interest, in non-accrual status effective 10/09/2007, past due)
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Secured Note (7.00% plus 7.00% PIK plus 6.00% default
interest, in non-accrual status effective 10/09/2007, past due)
|
|
|
14,003
|
|
|
|
14,003
|
|
|
|
3,177
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock Series A (10 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (49 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,652
|
|
|
|
5,275
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share data)
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Locale / Industry
|
|
Investments(1)
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
LEVEL 3 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control Investments (25.00% or greater of voting control)
|
Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.
|
|
Alberta, Canada/Production Services
|
|
Bridge Loan (15.00% plus 3.00% PIK, in non-accrual status
effective 5/01/2009, due 12/31/2009)
|
|
$
|
11,418
|
|
|
$
|
11,199
|
|
|
$
|
10,440
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Note (15.00%, in non-accrual status effective
5/01/2009, due 12/31/2009)
|
|
|
9,250
|
|
|
|
9,250
|
|
|
|
1,878
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (1,781 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,717
|
|
|
|
12,318
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRG Manufacturing, Inc.
|
|
Texas/Manufacturing
|
|
Senior Secured Note (16.50%, due 8/31/2011)(3),(4)
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (800 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
|
|
13,610
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,397
|
|
|
|
26,690
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nupla Corporation
|
|
California/Home & Office Furnishings, Housewares &
Durable
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit (0.50% 7.25% plus 2.00%
default interest, due 9/04/2012)(4)
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
933
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan A (8.00% plus 2.00% default interest,
due 9/04/2012)(4)
|
|
|
5,139
|
|
|
|
1,503
|
|
|
|
1,503
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Debt (10.00% plus 5.00% PIK, in non-accrual
status effective 4/01/2009, due 3/04/2013)
|
|
|
3,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock Class A (475 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock Class B (1,045 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (1,140,584 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,436
|
|
|
|
2,432
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R-V Industries, Inc.
|
|
Pennsylvania/Manufacturing
|
|
Warrants (200,000 warrants, expiring 6/30/2017)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
3,211
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (545,107 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,086
|
|
|
|
8,751
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,768
|
|
|
|
11,962
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sidumpr Trailer Company, Inc.
|
|
Nebraska/Automobile
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit (0.50% 7.25%, in
non-accrual status effective 11/01/2008, due 1/10/2011)(4)
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan A (7.25%, in non-accrual status
effective 11/01/2008, due 1/10/2011)(4)
|
|
|
2,048
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan B (8.75%, in-non-accrual status
effective 11/01/2008, due 1/10/2011)(4)
|
|
|
2,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan C (16.50% PIK, in non-accrual status
effective 9/27/2008, due 7/10/2011)
|
|
|
2,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan D (7.25%, in non-accrual status
effective 11/01/2008, due 7/10/2011)(4)
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (49,635 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (64,050 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yatesville Coal Holdings, Inc.(11)
|
|
Kentucky/Mining, Steel, Iron and Non- Precious Metals and Coal
Production
|
|
Senior Secured Note (15.77%, in non-accrual status effective
1/01/2009, due 12/31/2010)(4)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Secured Note (15.77%, in non-accrual status effective
1/01/2009, due 12/31/2010)(4)
|
|
|
41,836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (1,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Control Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,867
|
|
|
|
191,898
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share data)
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Locale / Industry
|
|
Investments(1)
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
LEVEL 3 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate Investments (5.00% to 24.99% voting control)
|
Appalachian Energy Holdings LLC(12)
|
|
West Virginia/Construction Services
|
|
Senior Secured Debt Tranche A (14.00% plus
3.00% PIK plus 3.00% default interest, in non-accrual status
effective 11/01/2008, due 1/31/2011)
|
|
$
|
2,066
|
|
|
$
|
1,897
|
|
|
$
|
1,165
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Debt Tranche B (14.00% plus
3.00% PIK plus 3.00% default interest, in non-accrual status
effective 11/01/2008, past due)
|
|
|
2,120
|
|
|
|
1,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock Series A (200 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock Series B (241 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock Series C (500 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants (6,065 warrants, expiring 2/13/2016)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants (6,025 warrants, expiring 6/17/2018)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants (25,000 warrants, expiring 11/30/2018)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,028
|
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biotronic NeuroNetwork(17)
|
|
Michigan/Healthcare
|
|
Senior Secured Note (11.50% plus 1.00% PIK, due 2/21/2013)(3),(4)
|
|
|
26,227
|
|
|
|
26,227
|
|
|
|
27,014
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (9,925 shares)(13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,527
|
|
|
|
30,511
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boxercraft Incorporated
|
|
Georgia/Textiles & Leather
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit (0.50%, due 9/16/2013)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan A (9.50% 10.50%, due
9/16/2013)(4)
|
|
|
4,049
|
|
|
|
3,412
|
|
|
|
3,140
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan B (10.00% 11.00%, due
9/16/2013)(4)
|
|
|
4,835
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
3,788
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan C (12.00% plus 6.50% PIK, due 3/16/2014)
|
|
|
7,003
|
|
|
|
5,468
|
|
|
|
5,467
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (1,000,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (10,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,630
|
|
|
|
12,395
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KTPS Holdings, LLC
|
|
Colorado/Textiles & Leather
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit (0.50%, due 1/31/2012)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan A (10.50% 11.25%, due
1/31/2012)(4)
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
|
|
3,142
|
|
|
|
2,840
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan B (12.00%, due 1/31/2012)
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan C (12.00% plus 6.00% PIK, due 3/31/2012)
|
|
|
4,725
|
|
|
|
4,027
|
|
|
|
3,959
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Membership Interest Class A (730 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Membership Interest Common (199,795 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,541
|
|
|
|
7,171
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miller Petroleum, Inc.
|
|
Tennessee/Oil & Gas Production
|
|
Warrants, Common Stock (2,117,689 warrants, expiring 5/04/2010
to 12/31/2014)(14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
937
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
937
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smart, LLC(15)
|
|
New York/Diversified/Conglomerate Service
|
|
Membership Interest Class B (1,218 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Membership Interest Class D (1 unit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-8
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share data)
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Locale / Industry
|
|
Investments(1)
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
LEVEL 3 INVESTMENTS:
|
Affiliate Investments (5.00% to 24.99% voting control)
|
Sport Helmets Holdings, LLC(15)
|
|
New York/Personal & Nondurable Consumer Products
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit (0.50%, due 12/14/2013)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan A (4.26% 6.00%, due
12/14/2013)(4)
|
|
$
|
3,975
|
|
|
|
2,302
|
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan B (4.76% 6.50%, due
12/14/2013)(4)
|
|
|
7,425
|
|
|
|
4,963
|
|
|
|
5,072
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Debt Series A (12.00% plus
3.00% PIK, due 6/14/2014)
|
|
|
7,215
|
|
|
|
5,655
|
|
|
|
5,646
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Debt Series B (10.00% plus
5.00% PIK, due 6/14/2014)
|
|
|
1,324
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (20,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,176
|
|
|
|
14,300
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,052
|
|
|
|
66,479
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non- affiliate Investments (less than 5.00% of
voting control)
|
ADAPCO, Inc.
|
|
Florida/Ecological
|
|
Common Stock (5,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft Fasteners International, LLC
|
|
California/Machinery
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit (0.50%, due 11/01/2012)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan (3.92% 5.40%, due
11/01/2012)(4)
|
|
|
5,188
|
|
|
|
3,653
|
|
|
|
3,675
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Secured Term Loan (12.00% plus 2.00% PIK, due 5/01/2013)
|
|
|
5,433
|
|
|
|
4,555
|
|
|
|
4,613
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Preferred Stock (32,500 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,604
|
|
|
|
8,684
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Gilsonite Company
|
|
Utah/Specialty Minerals
|
|
Senior Subordinated Note (12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, due
3/14/2013)(3)
|
|
|
14,783
|
|
|
|
14,783
|
|
|
|
15,078
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Membership Interest Units in AGC/PEP, LLC (99.9999%)(16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
2,728
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,814
|
|
|
|
17,806
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arrowhead General Insurance Agency, Inc.(17)
|
|
California/Insurance
|
|
Junior Secured Term Loan (10.25% plus 2.50% PIK, due 2/8/2013)
|
|
|
5,085
|
|
|
|
3,873
|
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,873
|
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borga, Inc.
|
|
California/Mining, Steel, Iron and Non-Precious Metals and Coal
Production
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit (0.50% 5.00% plus 3.00%
default interest, due 5/06/2010)(4)
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan B (8.50% plus 3.00% default interest,
due 5/6/2010)(4)
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
|
|
1,411
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan C (12.00% plus 4.00% PIK plus 3.00%
default interest, due 5/06/2010)
|
|
|
8,453
|
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants (33,750 warrants)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,763
|
|
|
|
2,677
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-9
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share data)
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Locale / Industry
|
|
Investments(1)
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
LEVEL 3 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non- affiliate Investments (less than 5.00% of
voting control)
|
Caleel + Hayden, LLC (15)
|
|
Colorado/Personal & Nondurable
|
|
Junior Secured Term Loan B (9.75% 10.00%, due
11/10/2011)(4)
|
|
$
|
8,425
|
|
|
$
|
8,399
|
|
|
$
|
8,416
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
Consumer Products
|
|
Senior Subordinated Debt (12.00% plus 4.50% PIK, due 11/10/2012)
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
5,779
|
|
|
|
5,778
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (7,500 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Options in Mineral Fusion Natural Brands, LLC (11,662 options)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,529
|
|
|
|
14,545
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Castro Cheese Company, Inc.
|
|
Texas/Food Products
|
|
Junior Secured Note (11.00% plus 2.00% PIK, due 2/28/2013)(3)
|
|
|
7,615
|
|
|
|
7,505
|
|
|
|
7,655
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,505
|
|
|
|
7,655
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copernicus Group
|
|
North Carolina/Healthcare
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit (0.50% 10.50%, due
10/08/2013)(4)
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan A (10.50% 11.50%, due
10/08/2013)(4)
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
5,272
|
|
|
|
5,205
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Debt (12.00% plus 6.00% PIK
10.00% plus 10.00% PIK, due 4/08/2014)
|
|
|
12,741
|
|
|
|
10,661
|
|
|
|
11,948
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock Series A (1,000,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock Series C (212,121 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,215
|
|
|
|
17,293
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custom Direct, Inc.(17)
|
|
Maryland/Printing & Publishing
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan (3.06%, due 12/31/2013)(4)
|
|
|
1,651
|
|
|
|
1,204
|
|
|
|
1,219
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Secured Term Loan (6.31%, due 12/31/2014)(4)
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,447
|
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deb Shops, Inc.(17)
|
|
Pennsylvania/Retail
|
|
Second Lien Debt (1.00% plus 13.00% PIK, in non-accrual status
effective 2/24/2009, due 10/23/2014)
|
|
|
16,378
|
|
|
|
14,607
|
|
|
|
2,318
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,607
|
|
|
|
2,318
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diamondback Operating, LP
|
|
Oklahoma/Oil & Gas Production
|
|
Net Profits Interest (15.00% payable on Equity distributions)(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXL Acquisition Corp.
|
|
South Carolina/Electronics
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit (0.50%, due 3/15/2012)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan A (3.93% 5.50%, due
3/15/2011)(4)
|
|
|
1,790
|
|
|
|
1,494
|
|
|
|
1,473
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan B (4.18% 5.75%, due
3/15/2012)(4)
|
|
|
4,053
|
|
|
|
3,680
|
|
|
|
3,714
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan C (4.68% 6.25%, due
3/15/2012)(4)
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,294
|
|
|
|
2,316
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan D (12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, due 3/15/2012)
|
|
|
5,967
|
|
|
|
6,039
|
|
|
|
6,085
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Class A (2,475 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Class B (25 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,322
|
|
|
|
14,403
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fairchild Industrial Products, Co.(2)
|
|
North Carolina/Electronics
|
|
Preferred Stock Class A (378 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Class B (28 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H&M Oil & Gas, LLC
|
|
Texas/Oil & Gas Production
|
|
Senior Secured Note (13.00%, due 6/30/2010)
|
|
|
49,661
|
|
|
|
49,661
|
|
|
|
46,081
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Net Profits Interest (8.00% payable on Equity distributions)(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,661
|
|
|
|
47,128
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-10
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share data)
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Locale / Industry
|
|
Investments(1)
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
LEVEL 3 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non- affiliate Investments (less than 5.00% of
voting control)
|
Hudson Products Holdings, Inc.(17)
|
|
Texas/Mining, Steel, Iron and Non-Precious Metals and Coal
Production
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan (8.00%, due 8/24/2015)(4)
|
|
$
|
7,406
|
|
|
$
|
6,729
|
|
|
$
|
6,993
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,729
|
|
|
|
6,993
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IEC Systems LP (IEC)/Advanced Rig
|
|
Texas/Oilfield Fabrication
|
|
IEC Senior Secured Note (12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, due
11/20/2012)(3),(4)
|
|
|
20,209
|
|
|
|
20,209
|
|
|
|
20,209
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
Services LLC (ARS)
|
|
|
|
ARS Senior Secured Note (12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, due
11/20/2012)(3),(4)
|
|
|
12,128
|
|
|
|
12,128
|
|
|
|
12,128
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,337
|
|
|
|
32,337
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact Products, LLC
|
|
Ohio/Machinery
|
|
Junior Secured Term Loan (6.25% 8.25%, due
9/09/2012)(4)
|
|
|
8,835
|
|
|
|
7,704
|
|
|
|
7,753
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Debt (10.00% plus 5.00%, due 9/09/2012)
|
|
|
5,548
|
|
|
|
5,259
|
|
|
|
5,260
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,963
|
|
|
|
13,013
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Label Corp Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Nebraska/Printing & Publishing
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan (8.50%, due 8/08/2014)(4)
|
|
|
5,823
|
|
|
|
5,193
|
|
|
|
5,306
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,193
|
|
|
|
5,306
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LHC Holdings Corp.(17)
|
|
Florida/Healthcare
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit (0.50%, due 11/30/2012)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan A (4.31% 5.75%, due
11/30/2012)(4)
|
|
|
2,918
|
|
|
|
2,114
|
|
|
|
2,177
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Debt (12.00% plus 2.50% PIK, due 5/31/2013)
|
|
|
4,565
|
|
|
|
4,157
|
|
|
|
4,156
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Membership Interest (125 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,487
|
|
|
|
6,549
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac & Massey Holdings, LLC
|
|
Georgia/Food Products
|
|
Senior Subordinated Debt (10.00% plus 5.75% PIK, due 2/10/2013)
|
|
|
8,426
|
|
|
|
6,960
|
|
|
|
6,940
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (250 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,129
|
|
|
|
7,110
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maverick Healthcare, LLC
|
|
Arizona/Healthcare
|
|
Second Lien Debt (12.50% plus 3.50% PIK, due 4/30/2014)(3)
|
|
|
12,894
|
|
|
|
12,894
|
|
|
|
12,894
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Units (1,250,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
1,693
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Units (1,250,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,146
|
|
|
|
14,587
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northwestern Management Services, LLC
|
|
Florida/Healthcare
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit (0.50%, due 12/13/2012)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan A (4.24% 5.75%, due
12/13/2012)(4)
|
|
|
5,050
|
|
|
|
4,050
|
|
|
|
3,936
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan B (4.74% 6.25%, due
12/13/2012)(4)
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Secured Term Loan (12.00% plus 3.00%, due 6/13/2013)
|
|
|
2,927
|
|
|
|
2,372
|
|
|
|
2,370
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (50 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,657
|
|
|
|
7,542
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-11
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share data)
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Locale / Industry
|
|
Investments(1)
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
LEVEL 3 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non- affiliate Investments (less than 5.00% of
voting control)
|
Prince Mineral Company, Inc.
|
|
New York/Metal Services and Minerals
|
|
Junior Secured Term Loan
(5.29% 7.00%, due 12/21/2012)(4)
|
|
$
|
11,175
|
|
|
$
|
7,633
|
|
|
$
|
7,816
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Debt (13.00% plus 1.00%, due 7/21/2013)
|
|
|
12,168
|
|
|
|
1,279
|
|
|
|
1,269
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,912
|
|
|
|
9,085
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualitest Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(17)
|
|
Alabama/Pharmaceuticals
|
|
Second Lien Debt (7.78%, due 4/30/2015)(3),(4)
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
11,952
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,952
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Management Corp.
|
|
South Carolina/Financial Services
|
|
Second Lien Debt (13.00% plus 2.00% PIK, due 6/29/2012)(3)
|
|
|
25,685
|
|
|
|
25,685
|
|
|
|
24,511
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,685
|
|
|
|
24,511
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R-O-M Corporation
|
|
Missouri/Manufacturing
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit (0.50%, due 2/08/2013)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan A (3.00% 4.75%, due
2/08/2013)(4)
|
|
|
5,440
|
|
|
|
4,600
|
|
|
|
4,456
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Term Loan B (4.50% 6.25%, due
5/08/2013)(4)
|
|
|
8,294
|
|
|
|
7,035
|
|
|
|
7,263
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Debt (12.00% plus 3.00% due 8/08/2013)
|
|
|
7,282
|
|
|
|
6,929
|
|
|
|
6,939
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,564
|
|
|
|
18,658
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shearers Foods, Inc.
|
|
Ohio/Food Products
|
|
Second Lien Debt (15.00%, due 10/31/2013)(3)
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
18,180
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Membership Interest Units in Mistral Chip Holdings, LLC
(2,000 units)(18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
4,467
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
22,647
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stryker Energy, LLC
|
|
Ohio/Oil & Gas Production
|
|
Subordinated Secured Revolving Credit Facility (12.00%, due
12/01/2011)(3),(4)
|
|
|
29,500
|
|
|
|
29,217
|
|
|
|
28,360
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Overriding Royalty Interests(19)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,762
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,217
|
|
|
|
31,122
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TriZetto Group(17)
|
|
California/Healthcare
|
|
Subordinated Unsecured Note (12.00% plus 1.50% PIK, due
10/01/2016)(3)
|
|
|
15,319
|
|
|
|
15,185
|
|
|
|
15,771
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,181
|
|
|
|
15,771
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unitek(17)
|
|
Pennsylvania/Technical Services
|
|
Second Lien Debt (13.08%, due 12/31/2013)(3),(4)
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
11,373
|
|
|
|
11,615
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,373
|
|
|
|
11,615
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wind River Resources Corp. and Wind River II Corp.
|
|
Utah/Oil & Gas Production
|
|
Senior Secured Note (13.00% plus 3.00% default interest, in
non-accrual status effective 12/01/2008, due 7/31/2010)(4)
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,627
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Net Profits Interest (5.00% payable on Equity distributions)(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
10,627
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments (Level 3
Investments)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399,598
|
|
|
|
389,640
|
|
|
|
61.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Level 3 Portfolio Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
633,517
|
|
|
|
648,017
|
|
|
|
101.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-12
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share data)
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Locale / Industry
|
|
Investments(1)
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
LEVEL 1 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non- affiliate Investments (less than 5.00% of
voting control)
|
Allied Defense Group, Inc.
|
|
Virginia/Aerospace
& Defense
|
|
Common Stock (10,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dover Saddlery, Inc.
|
|
Massachusetts/Retail
|
|
Common Stock (30,974 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate
Investments (Level 1 Investments)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
101.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
633,636
|
|
|
|
648,135
|
|
|
|
101.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVEL 2 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market Funds
|
Fidelity Institutional Money Market Funds Government
Portfolio (Class I)
|
|
|
16,070
|
|
|
|
16,070
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
Fidelity Institutional Money Market Funds Government
Portfolio (Class I)(3)
|
|
|
3,347
|
|
|
|
3,347
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Victory Government Money Market Funds
|
|
|
4,001
|
|
|
|
4,001
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Money Market Funds (Level 2 Investments)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657,054
|
|
|
|
671,553
|
|
|
|
105.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-13
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share data)
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Locale / Industry
|
|
Investments(1)
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
LEVEL 3 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control Investments (25.00% or greater of voting control)
|
Ajax Rolled Ring & Machine, Inc.
|
|
South Carolina/Manufacturing
|
|
Senior Secured Note Tranche A (10.50%, due
4/01/2013)(3),(4)
|
|
$
|
21,487
|
|
|
$
|
21,487
|
|
|
$
|
21,487
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Secured Note Tranche B (11.50%
plus 6.00% PIK, due 4/01/2013)(3),(4)
|
|
|
11,675
|
|
|
|
11,675
|
|
|
|
10,151
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Preferred Stock Series A
(6,143 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted Common Stock (6 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,219
|
|
|
|
31,638
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C&J Cladding LLC
|
|
Texas/Metal Services and Minerals
|
|
Senior Secured Note (14.00%, due 3/30/2012)(3),(4)
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
3,308
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants (400 warrants, expiring 3/30/2014)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
3,825
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,302
|
|
|
|
7,133
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change Clean Energy Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Maine/Biomass Power
|
|
Common Stock (1,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.(8)
|
|
Texas/Gas Gathering and Processing
|
|
Senior Secured Note (18.00%, due 12/22/2018)(3)
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Secured Note (18.00%, due 12/23/2018)(3)
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (100 shares)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,003
|
|
|
|
55,187
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,003
|
|
|
|
85,187
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated Contract Services, Inc.(9)
|
|
North Carolina/Contracting
|
|
Senior Demand Note (15.00%, due 6/30/2009)(10)
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Note (7.00% plus 7.00% PIK plus 6.00% default
interest, in non-accrual status effective 10/09/2007, past due)
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Secured Note (7.00% plus 7.00% PIK plus 6.00% default
interest, in non-accrual status effective 10/09/2007, past due)
|
|
|
14,003
|
|
|
|
14,003
|
|
|
|
3,030
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock Series A (10 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (49 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,652
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.
|
|
Alberta, Canada/Production Services
|
|
Bridge Loan (15.00% plus 3.00% PIK, due 12/31/2009)
|
|
|
9,826
|
|
|
|
9,826
|
|
|
|
9,602
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Note (15.00%, due 12/31/2009)
|
|
|
9,250
|
|
|
|
9,250
|
|
|
|
3,004
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (1,781 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,344
|
|
|
|
12,606
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRG Manufacturing, Inc.
|
|
Texas/Manufacturing
|
|
Senior Secured Note (16.50%, due 8/31/2011)(3),(4)
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (800 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
|
|
19,294
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,397
|
|
|
|
32,374
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R-V Industries, Inc.
|
|
Pennsylvania/Manufacturing
|
|
Warrants (200,000 warrants, expiring 6/30/2017)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (545,107 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,086
|
|
|
|
12,267
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.768
|
|
|
|
16,767
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-14
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share data)
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Locale / Industry
|
|
Investments(1)
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Yatesville Coal Holdings, Inc.(11)
|
|
Kentucky/Mining, Steel, Iron and Non- Precious Metals and Coal
Production
|
|
Senior Secured Note (15.72%, in non-accrual status effective
1/01/2009, due 12/31/2010)(4)
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Secured Note (15.72%, in non-accrual status effective
1/01/2009, due 12/31/2010)(4)
|
|
|
38,463
|
|
|
|
38,463
|
|
|
|
3,097
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (1,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,890
|
|
|
|
13,097
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Control Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,105
|
|
|
|
206,332
|
|
|
|
38.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVEL 3 INVESTMENTS:
|
Affiliate Investments (5.00% to 24.99% voting control)
|
Appalachian Energy Holdings LLC(12)
|
|
West Virginia/Construction Services
|
|
Senior Secured Debt Tranche A (14.00% plus
3.00% PIK plus 3.00% default interest, in non-accrual status
effective 11/01/2008, due 1/31/2011)
|
|
|
1,997
|
|
|
|
1,891
|
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Debt Tranche B (14.00% plus
3.00% PIK plus 3.00% default interest, in non-accrual status
effective 11/01/2008, past due)
|
|
|
2,050
|
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock Series A (200 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock Series B (241 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock Series C (500 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants (6,065 warrants, expiring 2/13/2016)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants (6,025 warrants, expiring 6/17/2018)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants (25,000 warrants, expiring 11/30/2018)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,017
|
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biotronic NeuroNetwork(17)
|
|
Michigan/Healthcare
|
|
Senior Secured Note (11.50% plus 1.00% PIK, due 2/21/2013)(3),(4)
|
|
|
26,227
|
|
|
|
26,227
|
|
|
|
27,007
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (9,925 shares)(13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
2,839
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,527
|
|
|
|
29,846
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,544
|
|
|
|
32,254
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate Investments (less than 5.00% of
voting control)
|
American Gilsonite Company
|
|
Utah/Specialty Minerals
|
|
Senior Subordinated Note (12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, due
3/14/2013)(3)
|
|
|
14,783
|
|
|
|
14,783
|
|
|
|
15,073
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Membership Interest Units in AGC/PEP, LLC (99.9999%)(16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
3,851
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,814
|
|
|
|
18,924
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Castro Cheese Company, Inc.
|
|
Texas/Food Products
|
|
Junior Secured Note (11.00% plus 2.00% PIK, due 2/28/2013)(3)
|
|
|
7,538
|
|
|
|
7,413
|
|
|
|
7,637
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,413
|
|
|
|
7,637
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conquest Cherokee, LLC(6)
|
|
Tennessee/Oil & Gas Production
|
|
Senior Secured Note (13.00% plus 4.00% default interest, in
non-accrual status effective 4/01/2009, past due)(4)
|
|
|
10,200
|
|
|
|
10,191
|
|
|
|
6,855
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Overriding Royalty Interests(19)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,191
|
|
|
|
7,420
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-15
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share data)
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Locale / Industry
|
|
Investments(1)
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Deb Shops, Inc.(17)
|
|
Pennsylvania/Retail
|
|
Second Lien Debt (8.67%, due 10/23/2014)
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
14,623
|
|
|
$
|
6,272
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,623
|
|
|
|
6,272
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diamondback Operating, LP
|
|
Oklahoma/Oil & Gas Production
|
|
Net Profits Interest (15.00% payable on Equity distributions)(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freedom Marine Services LLC
|
|
Louisiana/Shipping Vessels
|
|
Subordinated Secured Note (12.00% plus 4.00% PIK, due
12/31/2011)(3)
|
|
|
7,234
|
|
|
|
7,160
|
|
|
|
7,152
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Net Profits Interest (22.50% payable on Equity
distributions)(3),(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,160
|
|
|
|
7,381
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVEL 3 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate Investments (less than 5.00% of
voting control)
|
H&M Oil & Gas, LLC(3)
|
|
Texas/Oil & Gas Production
|
|
Senior Secured Note (13.00%, due 6/30/2010)(3)
|
|
|
49,688
|
|
|
|
49,688
|
|
|
|
49,697
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Net Profits Interest (8.00% payable on Equity
distributions)(3),(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,688
|
|
|
|
51,379
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IEC Systems LP (IEC) /Advanced Rig Services LLC
(ARS)
|
|
Texas/Oilfield Fabrication
|
|
IEC Senior Secured Note (12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, due
11/20/2012)(3),(4)
|
|
|
21,411
|
|
|
|
21,411
|
|
|
|
21,839
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
ARS Senior Secured Note (12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, due
11/20/2012)(3),(4)
|
|
|
12,836
|
|
|
|
12,836
|
|
|
|
13,092
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,247
|
|
|
|
34,931
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maverick Healthcare, LLC
|
|
Arizona/Healthcare
|
|
Second Lien Debt (12.00% plus 1.50% PIK, due 4/30/2014)(3)
|
|
|
12,691
|
|
|
|
12,691
|
|
|
|
12,816
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Units (1,250,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Common Units (1,250,000 units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,943
|
|
|
|
14,116
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miller Petroleum, Inc.
|
|
Tennessee/Oil & Gas Production
|
|
Warrants, Common Stock (1,935,523 warrants, expiring 5/04/2010
to 6/30/2014)(14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peerless Manufacturing
|
|
Texas/Manufacturing
|
|
Subordinated Secured Note (11.50% plus 3.50% PIK, due
4/29/2013)(3)
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,400
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,400
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualitest Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(17)
|
|
Alabama/Pharmaceuticals
|
|
Second Lien Debt (8.10%, due 4/30/2015)(3),(4)
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
11,949
|
|
|
|
11,452
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,949
|
|
|
|
11,452
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Management Corp.
|
|
South Carolina/Financial Services
|
|
Second Lien Debt (12.00% plus 2.00% PIK, due 6/29/2012)(3)
|
|
|
25,424
|
|
|
|
25,424
|
|
|
|
23,073
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,424
|
|
|
|
23,073
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resco Products, Inc.
|
|
Pennsylvania/Manufacturing
|
|
Second Lien Debt (8.67%, due 6/22/2014)(3),(4)
|
|
|
9,750
|
|
|
|
9,594
|
|
|
|
9,750
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,594
|
|
|
|
9,750
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-16
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share data)
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Locale / Industry
|
|
Investments(1)
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Shearers Foods, Inc.
|
|
Ohio/Food Products
|
|
Second Lien Debt (14.00%, due 10/31/2013)(3)
|
|
$
|
18,000
|
|
|
$
|
18,000
|
|
|
$
|
18,360
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Membership Interest Units in Mistral Chip Holdings, LLC
(2,000 units)(18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
3,419
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
21,779
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stryker Energy, LLC
|
|
Ohio/Oil & Gas Production
|
|
Subordinated Secured Revolving Credit Facility (12.00%, due
12/01/2011)(3),(4)
|
|
|
29,500
|
|
|
|
29,154
|
|
|
|
29,554
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Overriding Royalty Interests(19)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,918
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,154
|
|
|
|
32,472
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TriZetto Group(17)
|
|
California/Healthcare
|
|
Subordinated Unsecured Note (12.00% plus 1.50% PIK, due
10/01/2016)(3)
|
|
|
15,205
|
|
|
|
15,065
|
|
|
|
16,331
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,065
|
|
|
|
16,331
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unitek(17)
|
|
Pennsylvania/Technical Services
|
|
Second Lien Debt (13.08%, due 12/31/2013)(3),(4)
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
11,360
|
|
|
|
11,730
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,360
|
|
|
|
11,730
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVEL 3 INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate Investments (less than 5.00% of
voting control)
|
Wind River Resources Corp. and Wind River II Corp.
|
|
Utah/Oil & Gas Production
|
|
Senior Secured Note (13.00% plus 3.00% default interest, in
non-accrual status effective 12/01/2008, due 7/31/2010)(4)
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
12,644
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Net Profits Interest (5.00% payable on Equity distributions)(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
12,836
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310,775
|
|
|
|
308,582
|
|
|
|
57.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Level 3 Portfolio Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
531,424
|
|
|
|
547,168
|
|
|
|
102.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVEL 2 INVESTMENTS:
|
Money Market Funds
|
Fidelity Institutional Money Market Funds Government
Portfolio (Class I)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,753
|
|
|
|
94,753
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
Fidelity Institutional Money Market Funds Government
Portfolio (Class I)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,982
|
|
|
|
3,982
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Money Market Funds (Level 2 Investments)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
630,159
|
|
|
|
645,903
|
|
|
|
121.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-17
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share data)
(Continued)
Endnote Explanations for the Consolidated Schedule of
Investments as of December 31, 2009 and June 30,
2009
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The securities in which Prospect Capital Corporation
(we, us or our) has invested
were acquired in transactions that were exempt from registration
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Act. These securities may be resold only
in transactions that are exempt from registration under the
Securities Act. |
|
(2) |
|
Fair value is determined by or under the direction of our Board
of Directors. As of December 31, 2009, two of our portfolio
investments, Allied Defense Group, Inc. and Dover Saddlery,
Inc., were publically traded and classified as Level 1
within the valuation hierarchy established by Accounting
Standards Codification 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (ASC 820). As of December 31, 2009
and June 30, 2009, the fair value of our remaining
portfolio investments was determined using significant
unobservable inputs. ASC 820 classifies such inputs used to
measure fair value as Level 3 within the valuation
hierarchy. Our investments in money market funds are classified
as Level 2. See Note 3 and Note 4 within the
accompanying consolidated financial statements for further
discussion. |
|
(3) |
|
Security, or portion thereof, is held as collateral for the
revolving credit facility (see Note 10). The market values
of these investments at December 31, 2009 and June 30,
2009 were $339,012 and $434,069, respectively; they represent
50.5% and 67.2% of total investments at fair value, respectively. |
|
(4) |
|
Floating rate loan. Stated interest rate was in effect at
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009. |
|
(5) |
|
There are several entities involved in the Biomass investment.
We own 100 shares of common stock in Worcester Energy
Holdings, Inc. (WEHI), representing 100% of the
issued and outstanding common stock. WEHI, in turn, owns 51
membership certificates in Biochips LLC (Biochips),
which represents a 51% ownership stake. |
|
|
|
We own 282 shares of common stock in Worcester Energy Co.,
Inc. (WECO), which represents 51% of the issued and
outstanding common stock. We own directly 1,665 shares of
common stock in Change Clean Energy Inc. (CCEI),
f/k/a Worcester Energy Partners, Inc., which represents 51% of
the issued and outstanding common stock and the remaining 49% is
owned by WECO. CCEI owns 100 shares of common stock in
Precision Logging and Landclearing, Inc.
(Precision), which represents 100% of the issued and
outstanding common stock. |
|
|
|
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we created two new
entities in anticipation of the foreclosure proceedings against
the co-borrowers (WECO, CCEI and Biochips) Change Clean Energy
Holdings, Inc. (CCEHI) and DownEast Power Company,
LLC (DEPC). We own 1,000 shares of CCEHI,
representing 100% of the issued and outstanding stock, which in
turn, owns a 100% of the membership interests in DEPC. |
|
|
|
On March 11, 2009, we foreclosed on the assets formerly
held by CCEI and Biochips with a successful credit bid of $6,000
to acquire the assets. The assets were subsequently assigned to
DEPC. WECO, CCEI and Biochips are joint borrowers on the term
note issued to Prospect Capital. Effective July 1, 2008,
this loan was placed on non-accrual status. |
|
|
|
Biochips, WECO, CCEI, Precision and WEHI currently have no
material operations and no significant assets. As of
June 30, 2009, our Board of Directors assessed a fair value
of $0 for all of these equity positions and the loan position.
We determined that the impairment of both CCEI and CCEHI as of
June 30, 2009 was other than temporary and recorded a
realized loss for the amount that the amortized cost exceeds the
fair value at June 30, 2009. Our Board of Directors set the
value of the remaining CCEHI investment at $1,976 and $2,530 as
of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively. |
|
(6) |
|
During the three months ended December 31, 2009, we created
two new entities, Coalbed Inc. and Coalbed LLC, to foreclose on
the outstanding senior secured loan and assigned rights and
interests of Conquest |
F-18
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share data)
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Cherokee, LLC (Conquest), as a result of the
deterioration of Conquests financial performance and
inability to service debt payments. We own 1,000 shares of
common stock in Coalbed Inc., representing 100% of the issued
and outstanding common stock. Coalbed Inc., in turn owns 100% of
the membership interest in Coalbed LLC. |
|
|
|
On October 21, 2009, Coalbed LLC foreclosed on the loan
formerly made to Conquest. As of December 31, 2009, our
Board of Directors assessed a fair value of $3,686 for the
equity and the loan position in Coalbed LLC. |
|
(7) |
|
In addition to the stated returns, the net profits interest held
will be realized upon sale of the borrower or a sale of the
interests. |
|
(8) |
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc. is a wholly-owned investment of us. |
|
(9) |
|
Entity was formed as a result of the debt restructuring of ESA
Environmental Specialist, Inc. In early 2009, we foreclosed on
the two loans on non-accrual status and purchased the underlying
personal and real property. We own 1,000 shares of common
stock in The Healing Staff (THS), f/k/a Lisamarie
Fallon, Inc. representing 100% ownership. We own
1,500 shares of Vets Securing America, Inc.
(VSA), representing 100% ownership. VSA is a holding
company for the real property of Integrated Contract Services,
Inc. (ICS) purchased during the foreclosure process. |
|
(10) |
|
Loan is with THS an affiliate of ICS. |
|
(11) |
|
On June 30, 2008, we consolidated our holdings in four coal
companies into Yatesville Coal Holdings, Inc.
(Yatesville), and consolidated the operations under
one management team. As part of the transaction, the debt that
we held of C&A Construction, Inc. (C&A),
Genesis Coal Corp. (Genesis), North Fork Collieries
LLC (North Fork) and Unity Virginia Holdings LLC
(Unity) were exchanged for newly issued debt from
Yatesville, and our ownership interests in C&A, E&L
Construction, Inc. (E&L), Whymore Coal Company
Inc. (Whymore), Genesis and North Fork were
exchanged for 100% of the equity of Yatesville. This
reorganization allows for a better utilization of the assets in
the consolidated group. Genesis Coal Corp.
(Genesis), was not part of the transaction. |
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 and at June 30, 2009, Yatesville
owned 100% of the membership interest of North Fork. In
addition, Yatesville held a $9,325 and $8,062, respectively,
note receivable from North Fork as of those two respective dates. |
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 and at June 30, 2009, Yatesville
owned 90% and 87%, respectively, of the common stock of Genesis
and held a note receivable of $20,897 and $20,802, respectively,
as of those two respective dates. |
|
|
|
Yatesville held a note receivable of $4,261 from Unity at
December 31, 2009 and at June 30, 2009. |
|
|
|
There are several entities involved in Yatesvilles
investment in Whymore at June 30, 2009. As of June 30,
2009, Yatesville owned 10,000 shares of common stock or
100% of the equity and held a $14,973 senior secured debt
receivable from C&A, which owns the equipment. Yatesville
owned 10,000 shares of common stock or 100% of the equity
of E&L, which leases the equipment from C&A, employs
the workers, is listed as the operator with the Commonwealth of
Kentucky, mines the coal, receives revenues and pays all
operating expenses. Yatesville owned 4,900 shares of common
stock or 49% of the equity of Whymore, which applies for and
holds permits on behalf of E&L. Yatesville also owned 4,285
Series A convertible preferred shares in each of C&A,
E&L and Whymore. Whymore and E&L are guarantors under
the C&A credit agreement with Yatesville. |
|
|
|
In August 2009, Yatesville sold its 49% ownership interest in
the common shares of Whymore to the 51% holder of the Whymore
common shares (Whymore Purchaser). All reclamation
liability was transferred to the Whymore Purchaser. In September
2009, Yatesville completed an auction for all of its equipment. |
F-19
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share data)
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Yatesville currently has no material operations. As of
December 31, 2009, our Board of Directors determined that
the impairment of Yatesville was other than temporary and we
recorded a realized loss for the amount that the amortized cost
exceeds the fair value. Our Board of Directors set the value of
the remaining Yatesville investment at $1,035 as of
December 31, 2009. |
|
(12) |
|
There are several entities involved in the Appalachian Energy
Holdings LLC (AEH) investment. We own warrants, the
exercise of which will permit us to purchase 37,090 Class A
common units of AEH at a nominal cost and in near-immediate
fashion. We own 200 units of Series A preferred
equity, 241 units of Series B preferred equity, and
500 units of Series C preferred equity of AEH. The
senior secured notes are with C&S Operating LLC and East
Cumberland L.L.C., both operating companies owned by AEH. |
|
(13) |
|
On a fully diluted basis represents, 11.677% of voting common
shares. |
|
(14) |
|
Total common shares outstanding of 19,310,956 as of
December 9, 2009 from Miller Petroleum, Inc.s
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on December 21, 2009 as applicable to our
December 31, 2009 reporting date. Total common shares
outstanding of 15,811,856 as of March 11, 2009 from
Millers Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on March 16, 2009. |
|
(15) |
|
A portion of the positions listed were issued by an affiliate of
the portfolio company. |
|
(16) |
|
We own 99.9999% of AGC/PEP, LLC. AGC/PEP, LLC owns 2,038 out of
a total of 83,639 shares (including 4,932 vested an
unvested management options) of American Gilsonite Holding
Company which owns 100% of American Gilsonite Company. |
|
(17) |
|
Syndicated investment which had been originated by another
financial institution and broadly distributed. |
|
(18) |
|
Mistral Chip Holdings, LLC owns 44,800 shares out of 50,650
total shares outstanding of Chip Holdings, Inc., the parent
company of Shearers Foods, Inc., before adjusting for
management options. |
|
(19) |
|
The overriding royalty interests held receive payments at the
stated rates based upon operations of the borrower. |
|
(20) |
|
On December 31, 2009, we sold our investment in Aylward
Enterprises, LLC. AWCNC, LLC is the remaining holding company
with zero assets and our remaining outstanding debt has no value
of December 31, 2009. |
F-20
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
References herein to we, us or
our refer to Prospect Capital Corporation
(Prospect) and its subsidiary unless the context
specifically requires otherwise.
We were formerly known as Prospect Energy Corporation, a
Maryland corporation. We were organized on April 13, 2004
and were funded in an initial public offering (IPO),
completed on July 27, 2004. We are a closed-end investment
company that has filed an election to be treated as a Business
Development Company (BDC), under the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). As a BDC, we
have qualified and have elected to be treated as a regulated
investment company (RIC), under Subchapter M of the
Internal Revenue Code. We invest primarily in senior and
subordinated debt and equity of companies in need of capital for
acquisitions, divestitures, growth, development, project
financings, recapitalizations, and other purposes.
On May 15, 2007, we formed a wholly-owned subsidiary,
Prospect Capital Funding, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company, for the purpose of holding certain of our loan
investments in the portfolio which are used as collateral for
our credit facility.
|
|
Note 2.
|
Patriot
Acquisition
|
On December 2, 2009, we acquired the outstanding shares of
Patriot Capital Funding, Inc. (Patriot) common stock
for $201,083. Under the terms of the merger agreement, Patriot
common shareholders received 0.363992 shares of our common
stock for each share of Patriot common stock, resulting in
8,444,068 shares of common stock being issued by us. In
connection with the transaction, we repaid all the outstanding
borrowings of Patriot, in compliance with the merger agreement.
On December 2, 2009, Patriot made a final dividend payment
equal to its undistributed net ordinary income and capital gains
of $0.38 per share. In accordance with a recent IRS revenue
procedure, the dividend was paid 10% in cash and 90% in newly
issued shares of Patriots common stock. The exchange ratio
was adjusted to give effect to the final income distribution.
The merger has been accounted for as an acquisition of Patriot
by Prospect in accordance with acquisition method of accounting
as detailed in ASC 805, Business Combinations (ASC
805). The fair value of the consideration paid was
allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based
on their fair values as of the date of acquisition. As described
in more detail in ASC 805, goodwill, if any, would have been
recognized as of the acquisition date, if the consideration
transferred exceeded the fair value of identifiable net assets
acquired. As of the acquisition date, the fair value of the
identifiable net assets acquired exceeded the fair value of the
consideration transferred, and we recognized the excess as a
gain. A gain of $5,714 was recorded by Prospect in the quarter
ended December 31, 2009 related to the acquisition of
Patriot. The acquisition of Patriot was negotiated in July 2009
with the purchase agreement being signed on August 3, 2009.
Between July 2009 and December 2, 2009, our valuation of
certain of the investments acquired from Patriot increased due
to market improvement, which resulted in the recognition of the
gain at closing.
F-21
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
Preliminary
Purchase Price Allocation
The purchase price has been allocated to the assets acquired and
the liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as
summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (to repay Patriot debt)
|
|
$
|
107,313
|
|
Cash (to fund purchase of restricted stock from former Patriot
employees)
|
|
|
970
|
|
Common stock issued(1)
|
|
|
92,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
|
201,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
Investments(2)
|
|
|
207,126
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,697
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired
|
|
|
212,682
|
|
Other liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(5,885
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
|
206,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary gain on Patriot acquisition(3)
|
|
$
|
5,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The value of the shares of common stock exchanged with the
Patriot common shareholders was based upon the closing price of
our common stock on December 2, 2009, the price immediately
prior to the closing of the transaction. |
|
(2) |
|
The fair value of Patriots investments were determined by
the Board of Directors in conjunction with an independent
valuation agent. This valuation resulted in a purchase price
which was $98,150 below the amortized cost of such investments.
For those assets which are performing, Prospect will record the
accretion to par value in interest income over the remaining
term of the investment. |
|
(3) |
|
The preliminary gain has been determined based upon the
estimated value of certain liabilities which are not yet
settled. Any changes to such accruals will be recoded in future
periods as an adjustment to such gain. We do not believe such
adjustments will be material. |
Preliminary
Condensed Statement of Net Assets Acquired
The following condensed statement of net assets acquired
reflects the preliminary values assigned to Patriots net
assets as of the acquisition date, December 2, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
$
|
207,126
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,697
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
212,682
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(5,885
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary fair value of net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
206,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
information does not purport to be indicative of actual
financial position or results of our operations had the Patriot
acquisition actually been
F-22
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
consummated at the beginning of each period presented. Certain
one-time charges have been eliminated. The pro forma adjustments
reflecting the allocation of the purchase price of Patriot and
the gain of $5,714 recognized on the Patriot Acquisition have
been eliminated from all periods presented. Management expects
to realize net operating synergies from this transaction. The
pro forma condensed combined financial information does not
reflect the potential impact of these synergies and does not
reflect any impact of additional accretion which would have been
recognized on the transaction, except for that which was
recorded after the transaction was consummated on
December 2, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Total Investment Income
|
|
$
|
30,730
|
|
|
$
|
32,384
|
|
|
$
|
60,298
|
|
|
$
|
78,412
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
18,098
|
|
|
|
16,392
|
|
|
|
31,812
|
|
|
|
44,953
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
|
|
|
(15,901
|
)
|
|
|
(11,944
|
)
|
|
|
(26,766
|
)
|
|
|
239
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
per share
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
(0.44
|
)
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
Note 3.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
The following are significant accounting policies consistently
applied by us:
Basis
of Presentation
The accompanying interim financial statements, which are not
audited, have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(GAAP) for interim financial information and
pursuant to the requirements for reporting on
Form 10-Q
and Article 6 and 10 of
Regulation S-X,
as appropriate.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of GAAP financial statements requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements
and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the
reported period. Changes in the economic environment, financial
markets, creditworthiness of our portfolio companies and any
other parameters used in determining these estimates could cause
actual results to differ, and these differences could be
material.
Basis
of Consolidation
Under the 1940 Act rules, the regulations pursuant to
Article 6 of
Regulation S-X
and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies, we are
precluded from consolidating any entity other than another
investment company or an operating company which provides
substantially all of its services and benefits to us. Our
financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of
Prospect Capital Funding, LLC, our only wholly-owned,
closely-managed subsidiary that is also an investment company.
All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated
in consolidation.
F-23
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
Investment
Classification
We are a non-diversified company within the meaning of the 1940
Act. We classify our investments by level of control. As defined
in the 1940 Act, control investments are those where there is
the ability or power to exercise a controlling influence over
the management or policies of a company. Control is generally
deemed to exist when a company or individual possesses or has
the right to acquire within 60 days or less, a beneficial
ownership of 25% or more of the voting securities of an investee
company. Affiliated investments and affiliated companies are
defined by a lesser degree of influence and are deemed to exist
through the possession outright or via the right to acquire
within 60 days or less, beneficial ownership of 5% or more
of the outstanding voting securities of another person.
Investments are recognized when we assume an obligation to
acquire a financial instrument and assume the risks for gains or
losses related to that instrument. Investments are derecognized
when we assume an obligation to sell a financial instrument and
forego the risks for gains or losses related to that instrument.
Specifically, we record all security transactions on a trade
date basis. Investments in other, non-security financial
instruments are recorded on the basis of subscription date or
redemption date, as applicable. Amounts for investments
recognized or derecognized but not yet settled are reported as
receivables for investments sold and payables for investments
purchased, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements of
Assets and Liabilities.
Investment
Risks
The Companys investments are subject to a variety of
risks. Those risks include the following:
Market
Risk
Market risk represents the potential loss that can be caused by
a change in the fair value of the financial instrument.
Credit
Risk
Credit risk represents the risk that the Partnership would incur
if the counterparties failed to perform pursuant to the terms of
their agreements with the Partnership.
Liquidity
Risk
Liquidity risk represents the possibility that the Partnership
may not be able to rapidly adjust the size of its positions in
times of high volatility and financial stress at a reasonable
price.
Interest
Rate Risk
Interest rate risk represents a change in interest rates, which
could result in an adverse change in the fair value of an
interest-bearing financial instrument.
Prepayment
Risk
Most of the Companys debt investments allow for prepayment
of principal without penalty. Downward changes in interest rates
may cause prepayments to occur at a faster than expected rate,
thereby effectively shortening the maturity of the security and
making the security less likely to be an income producing
instrument.
F-24
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
Investment
Valuation
Our Board of Directors has established procedures for the
valuation of our investment portfolio. These procedures are
detailed below. Investments for which market quotations are
readily available are valued at such market quotations.
For most of our investments, market quotations are not
available. With respect to investments for which market
quotations are not readily available or when such market
quotations are deemed not to represent fair value, our Board of
Directors has approved a multi-step valuation process each
quarter, as described below:
(1) Each portfolio company or investment is reviewed by our
investment professionals with the independent valuation firm;
(2) the independent valuation firm engaged by our Board of
Directors conducts independent appraisals and makes their own
independent assessment;
(3) the audit committee of our Board of Directors reviews
and discusses the preliminary valuation of our Investment
Adviser and that of the independent valuation firm; and
(4) the Board of Directors discusses valuations and
determines the fair value of each investment in our portfolio in
good faith based on the input of our Investment Adviser, the
respective independent valuation firm and the audit committee.
Investments are valued utilizing a market approach, an income
approach, or both approaches, as appropriate. The market
approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by
market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or
liabilities (including a business). The income approach uses
valuation techniques to convert future amounts (for example,
cash flows or earnings) to a single present value amount
(discounted) calculated based on an appropriate discount rate.
The measurement is based on the net present value indicated by
current market expectations about those future amounts. In
following these approaches, the types of factors that we may
take into account in fair value pricing our investments include,
as relevant: available current market data, including relevant
and applicable market trading and transaction comparables,
applicable market yields and multiples, security covenants, call
protection provisions, information rights, the nature and
realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio companys
ability to make payments, its earnings and discounted cash
flows, the markets in which the portfolio company does business,
comparisons of financial ratios of peer companies that are
public, M&A comparables, the principal market and
enterprise values, among other factors.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (ASC 820). ASC 820 defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP,
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. We
adopted ASC 820 on a prospective basis beginning in the quarter
ended September 30, 2008.
ASC 820 classifies the inputs used to measure these fair values
into the following hierarchy:
Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities, accessible by us at the
measurement date.
Level 2: Quoted prices for similar assets
or liabilities in active markets, or quoted prices for identical
or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active,
or other observable inputs other than quoted prices.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs for the
asset or liability.
In all cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which
the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been
determined based on the lowest level of input that is
significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment
F-25
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
of the significance of a particular input to the fair value
measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers
factors specific to each investment. The changes to GAAP from
the application of ASC 820 relate to the definition of fair
value, framework for measuring fair value, and the expanded
disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 applies to
fair value measurements already required or permitted by other
standards. In accordance with ASC 820, the fair value of our
investments is defined as the price that we would receive upon
selling an investment in an orderly transaction to an
independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market
in which that investment is transacted.
In April 2009, the FASB issued ASC Subtopic
820-10-65,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity
for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly
(ASC
820-10).
This update provides further clarification for ASC 820 in
markets that are not active and provides additional guidance for
determining when the volume of trading level of activity for an
asset or liability has significantly decreased and for
identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not
orderly. ASC
820-10-65 is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after
June 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC
820-10-65
for the three and six months ended December 31, 2009, did
not have any effect on our net asset value, financial position
or results of operations as there was no change to the fair
value measurement principles set forth in ASC 820.
Valuation
of Other Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities
In February 2007, FASB issued ASC Subtopic
820-10-05-1,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (ASC
820-10-05-1).
ASC
820-10-05-1
permits an entity to elect fair value as the initial and
subsequent measurement attribute for many of assets and
liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected and
similar assets and liabilities measured using another
measurement attribute. We adopted this statement on July 1,
2008 and have elected not to value other assets and liabilities
at fair value as would be permitted by ASC
820-10-05-1.
Revenue
Recognition
Realized gains or losses on the sale of investments are
calculated using the specific identification method.
Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and
accretion of discount, is recorded on an accrual basis.
Origination, closing
and/or
commitment fees associated with investments in portfolio
companies are accreted into interest income over the respective
terms of the applicable loans. Accretion of such purchase
discounts or premiums is calculated by the effective interest
method as of the purchase date and adjusted only for material
amendments or prepayments. Upon the prepayment of a loan or debt
security, any prepayment penalties and unamortized loan
origination, closing and commitment fees are recorded as
interest income. The purchase discount for portfolio investments
acquired from Patriot was determined based on the difference
between par value and fair market value as of December 2,
2009, and will continue to accrete until maturity or repayment
of the respective loans.
Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.
Structuring fees and similar fees are recognized as income as
earned, usually when paid. Structuring fees, excess deal
deposits, net profits interests and overriding royalty interests
are included in other income.
Loans are placed on non-accrual status when principal or
interest payments are past due 90 days or more or when
there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be
collected. Accrued interest is generally reversed when a loan is
placed on non-accrual status. Interest payments received on
non-accrual loans may be recognized as income or applied to
principal depending upon managements judgment. Non-accrual
loans are restored to accrual status when past due principal and
interest is paid and in managements judgment, are likely
to remain current.
F-26
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
Federal
and State Income Taxes
We have elected to be treated as a regulated investment company
and intend to continue to comply with the requirements of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code), applicable
to regulated investment companies. We are required to distribute
at least 90% of our investment company taxable income and intend
to distribute (or retain through a deemed distribution) all of
our investment company taxable income and net capital gain to
stockholders; therefore, we have made no provision for income
taxes. The character of income and gains that we will distribute
is determined in accordance with income tax regulations that may
differ from GAAP. Book and tax basis differences relating to
stockholder dividends and distributions and other permanent book
and tax differences are reclassified to paid-in capital.
If we do not distribute (or are not deemed to have distributed)
at least 98% of our annual taxable income in the calendar year
it is earned, we will generally be required to pay an excise tax
equal to 4% of the amount by which 98% of our annual taxable
income exceeds the distributions from such taxable income for
the year. To the extent that we determine that our estimated
current year annual taxable income will be in excess of
estimated current year dividend distributions from such taxable
income, we accrue excise taxes, if any, on estimated excess
taxable income as taxable income is earned using an annual
effective excise tax rate. The annual effective excise tax rate
is determined by dividing the estimated annual excise tax by the
estimated annual taxable income.
We adopted FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes (ASC
740). ASC 740 provides guidance for how uncertain tax
positions should be recognized, measured, presented, and
disclosed in the financial statements. ASC 740 requires the
evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the
course of preparing our tax returns to determine whether the tax
positions are more-likely-than-not of being
sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not
deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are recorded
as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Adoption of ASC
740 was applied to all open tax years as of July 1, 2007.
The adoption of ASC 740 did not have an effect on our net asset
value, financial condition or results of operations as there was
no liability for unrecognized tax benefits and no change to our
beginning net asset value. As of December 31, 2009 and for
the three and six months then ended, we did not have a liability
for any unrecognized tax benefits. Managements
determinations regarding ASC 740 may be subject to review
and adjustment at a later date based upon factors including, but
not limited to, an on-going analysis of tax laws, regulations
and interpretations thereof.
Dividends
and Distributions
Dividends and distributions to common stockholders are recorded
on the ex-dividend date. The amount, if any, to be paid as a
dividend or distribution is approved by our Board of Directors
each quarter and is generally based upon our managements
estimate of our earnings for the quarter. Net realized capital
gains, if any, are distributed at least annually.
Financing
Costs
We record origination expenses related to our credit facility as
deferred financing costs. These expenses are deferred and
amortized as part of interest expense using the effective
interest method over the stated life of the facility.
We record registration expenses related to shelf filings as
prepaid assets. These expenses consist principally of Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) registration fees,
legal fees and accounting fees incurred. These prepaid assets
will be charged to capital upon the receipt of an equity
offering proceeds or charged to expense if no offering completed.
F-27
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
Guarantees
and Indemnification Agreements
We follow FASB ASC 460, Guarantees (ASC
460). ASC 460 elaborates on the disclosure
requirements of a guarantor in its interim and annual financial
statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that
it has issued. It also requires a guarantor to recognize, at the
inception of a guarantee, for those guarantees that are covered
by ASC 460, the fair value of the obligation undertaken in
issuing certain guarantees. ASC 460 did not have a material
effect on the financial statements. Refer to Note 4,
Note 8 and Note 11 for further discussion of
guarantees and indemnification agreements.
Per
Share Information
Net increase or decrease in net assets resulting from operations
per common share are calculated using the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding for the period presented.
Diluted net increase or decrease in net assets resulting from
operations per share are not presented as there are no
potentially dilutive securities outstanding.
Subsequent
Events
In May 2009, the FASB issued ASC 855, Subsequent Events
(ASC 855). ASC 855 establishes general standards
of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or
are available to be issued. The standard, which includes a new
required disclosure of the date through which an entity has
evaluated subsequent events, is effective for interim or annual
periods ending after June 15, 2009. We evaluated all events
or transactions that occurred after December 31, 2009 up
through February 26, 2010, the date we issued the
accompanying financial statements. During this period, we did
not have any material recognizable subsequent events other than
those disclosed in our financial statements.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 105, Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (ASC 105), which
establishes the FASB Codification which supersedes all existing
accounting standard documents and will become the single source
of authoritative non-governmental U.S. GAAP. All other
accounting literature not included in the Codification will be
considered non-authoritative. The Codification did not change
GAAP but reorganizes the literature. ASC 105 is effective for
interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.
We have conformed our financial statements and related Notes to
the new Codification for the quarter ended December 31,
2009.
In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 860, Accounting for
Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment to
FAS 140 (ASC 860). ASC 860 improves the
relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of
the information that a reporting entity provides in its
financial statements about a transfer of financial assets: the
effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows: and a transferors continuing
involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. ASC 860 is
effective as of the beginning of each reporting entitys
first annual reporting period that begins after
November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first
annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting
periods thereafter. Our management does not believe that the
adoption of the amended guidance in ASC 860 will have a
significant effect on our financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 810, Amendments to FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R) (ASC 810). ASC 810
is intended to (1) address the effects on certain
provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December
2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, as a result
of the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity
concept in ASC 860, and (2) constituent concerns about the
application of certain key provisions of Interpretation 46(R),
including those in which the accounting and disclosures under
the Interpretation do not always
F-28
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
provided timely and useful information about an
enterprises involvement in a variable interest entity. ASC
810 is effective as of the beginning of our first annual
reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009. Our
management does not believe that the adoption of the amended
guidance in ASC 860 will have a significant effect on our
financial statements.
In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU)
2009-05,
Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value, to amend FASB Accounting
Standards Codification ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (ASC 820), to clarify how entities
should estimate the fair value of liabilities. ASC 820, as
amended, includes clarifying guidance for circumstances in which
a quoted price in an active market is not available, the effect
of the existence of liability transfer restrictions, and the
effect of quoted prices for the identical liability, including
when the identical liability is traded as an asset. We adopted
ASU 2009-05
effective October 1, 2009. The amended guidance in ASC 820
does not have a significant effect on our financial statements
for the quarter ended December 31, 2009.
In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU
2009-12,
Measuring Fair Value of Certain Investments (ASU
2009-12).
This update provides further amendments to ASC 820 to offer
investors a practical expedient for measuring the fair value of
investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value
per share. Specifically, measurement using net asset value per
share is reasonable for investments within the scope of ASU
2009-12. We
adopted ASU
2009-12
effective October 1, 2009. The amended guidance in ASC 820
does not have a significant effect on our financial statements
for the quarter ended December 31, 2009.
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
2010-06,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820):
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements
(ASC
2010-06).
ASU 2010-06
amends ASC
820-10 and
clarifies and provides additional disclosure requirements
related to recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements
and employers disclosures about postretirement benefit
plan assets. ASU
2010-06 is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2009. Our management does not believe
that the adoption of the amended guidance in ASC
820-10 will
have a significant effect on our financial statements.
|
|
Note 4.
|
Portfolio
Investments
|
At December 31, 2009, we had invested in 55 long-term
portfolio investments, which had an amortized cost of $633,636
and a fair value of $648,135. At June 30, 2009, we had
invested in 30 long-term portfolio investments, which had an
amortized cost of $531,424 and a fair value of $547,168.
As of December 31, 2009, we own controlling interests in
Ajax Rolled Ring & Machine (Ajax), AWCNC,
LLC, C&J Cladding, LLC (C&J), Change Clean
Energy Holdings, Inc. (CCEHI), Coalbed,
Inc./Coalbed, LLC (formerly Conquest Cherokee, LLC)
(Coalbed), Fischbein, LLC (Fischbein),
Freedom Marine Services LLC (Freedom Marine), Gas
Solutions Holdings, Inc. (GSHI), Integrated Contract
Services, Inc. (ICS), Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.
(Iron Horse), NRG Manufacturing, Inc.
(NRG), Nupla Corporation (Nupla), R-V
Industries, Inc. (R-V), Sidumpr Trailer
Company, Inc. (Sidumpr) and Yatesville Coal
Holdings, Inc. (Yatesville). We also own an
affiliated interest in Appalachian Energy Holdings, LLC
(AEH), Biotronic NeuroNetwork
(Biotronic), Boxercraft Incorporated
(Boxercraft), KTPS Holdings, LLC (KTPS),
Miller Petroleum, Inc. (Miller), Smart, LLC
(Smart) and Sport Helmets Holdings, LLC (Sport
Helmets).
F-29
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
The fair values of our portfolio investments as of
December 31, 2009 disaggregated into the three levels of
the ASC 820 valuation hierarchy are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Investments at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
191,898
|
|
|
$
|
191,898
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,479
|
|
|
|
66,479
|
|
Non-control/non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
389,640
|
|
|
|
389,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
648,017
|
|
|
|
648,135
|
|
Investments in money market funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets reported at fair value
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
23,418
|
|
|
$
|
648,017
|
|
|
$
|
671,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate values of Level 3 portfolio investments
changed during the six months ended December 31, 2009 as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using Unobservable Inputs (Level
3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
Affiliate
|
|
|
Non-Affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair value as of June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
206,332
|
|
|
$
|
32,254
|
|
|
$
|
308,582
|
|
|
$
|
547,168
|
|
Total realized losses
|
|
|
(51,229
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,229
|
)
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
7,390
|
|
|
|
(283
|
)
|
|
|
(7,209
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)(1)
|
Assets acquired in the Patriot acquisition
|
|
|
10,534
|
|
|
|
36,400
|
|
|
|
160,073
|
|
|
|
207,007
|
|
Purchases of portfolio investments
|
|
|
5,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,467
|
|
|
|
7,321
|
|
Payment-in-kind
interest
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
Accretion of original issue discount
|
|
|
3,343
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
3,046
|
|
|
|
6,670
|
|
Dispositions of portfolio investments
|
|
|
(8,733
|
)
|
|
|
(2,516
|
)
|
|
|
(59,628
|
)
|
|
|
(70,877
|
)
|
Transfers within Level 3
|
|
|
17,682
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
(17,832
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers in (out) of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
191,898
|
|
|
$
|
66,479
|
|
|
$
|
389,640
|
|
|
$
|
648,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Relates to assets held at December 31, 2009. |
As of December 31, 2009, the valuation methodology for Ajax
changed from a discounted cash flow analysis to an enterprise
and equity valuation. The independent valuation agent proposed
this adjustment due to our controlling equity interest in Ajax.
As a result, and combined with declining financial results, the
fair market value of Ajax decreased from $31,638 to $25,802 as
of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
There were no other material changes to our valuation
methodology.
At December 31, 2009, nine loan investments were on
non-accrual status: AEH, Coalbed, Deb Shops, ICS, Iron Horse,
Nupla, Sidumpr, Wind River Resources Corp. and Wind
River II Corp. (Wind River), and Yatesville.
F-30
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
At June 30, 2009, five loan investments were on non-accrual
status: AEH, Coalbed, ICS, Wind River and Yatesville. The loan
principal of these loans amounted to $146,376 and $92,513 as of
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively. The
fair values of these investments represent approximately 5.7%
and 7.3% of our net assets as of December 31, 2009 and
June 30, 2009, respectively. For the three months ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the income
foregone as a result of not accruing interest on non-accrual
debt investments amounted to $8,052 and $2,528, respectively.
For the six months ended December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, the income foregone as a result of not
accruing interest on non-accrual debt investments amounted to
$12,510 and $4,983, respectively. At December 31, 2009, we
held one asset on which payment of interest was past-due more
than 90 days for which we continue to accrue interest,
H&M Oil and Gas, LLC. The principal balance of this loan is
$49,661 and the accrued interest receivable is $2,744 at
December 31, 2009. We expect full repayment of principal
and interest on this loan.
During the three months ended December 31, 2009, we
discontinued operations at Yatesville. As of December 31,
2009, consistent with the decision to discontinue operations, we
determined that the impairment of Yatesville was
other-than-temporary
and recorded a realized loss of $51,228 for the amount that the
amortized cost exceeded the fair market value. As of
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, Yatesville is
valued at $1,035 and $13,097, respectively.
GSHI has indemnified us against any legal action arising from
its investment in Gas Solutions, LP. We have incurred
approximately $2,093 from the inception of the investment in
GSHI through December 31, 2009 for fees associated with a
legal action, and GSHI has reimbursed us for the entire amount.
Of the $2,093 reimbursement, $41 and $182 was reflected as
dividend income: control investments in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended
December 31, 2008, respectively. There were no such legal
fees incurred or reimbursed for the three and six months ended
December 31, 2009. Additionally, certain other expenses
incurred by us which are attributable to GSHI have been
reimbursed by GSHI and are reflected as dividend income: control
investments in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. For
the three months ended December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, such reimbursements totaled as $800 and
$1,895, respectively. For the six months ended December 31,
2009 and December 31, 2008, such reimbursements totaled as
$2,031 and $3,515, respectively.
The original cost basis of debt placements and equity securities
acquired (including purchases of portfolio investments,
follow-on investments and
payment-in-kind
interest) totaled to approximately $210,438 and $13,564 during
the three months ended December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. These placements and
acquisitions totaled to approximately $216,506 and $84,020
during the six months ended December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. The $210,438 and $216,506
for the three and six months ended December 31, 2009,
respectively, include $207,126 of portfolio investments acquired
from Patriot. Debt repayments and sales of equity securities
with a cost basis of approximately $45,494 and $2,112 were
received during the three months ended December 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively. These repayments and
sales amounted to $69,735 and $11,416 during the six months
ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively.
|
|
Note 5.
|
Other
Investment Income
|
Other investment income consists of the gain on our acquisition
of Patriot, structuring and amendment fees, overriding royalty
interests, settlement of net profit interests, deal deposits,
administrative agent fee, and other
F-31
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
miscellaneous and sundry cash receipts. Income from such sources
for the three and six months ended December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Months Ended December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Income Source
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Gain on Patriot acquisition
|
|
$
|
5,714
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,714
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Structuring and amendment fees
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
Overriding royalty interests
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
Settlement of net profits interests
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
12,576
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Investment Income
|
|
$
|
6,174
|
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
6,638
|
|
|
$
|
13,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6.
|
Equity
Offerings and Related Expenses
|
We issued 11,437,797 shares of our common stock in public
and private offerings during the six months ended December,
2009. We did not issue any common stock during the six months
ended December 31, 2008. The proceeds raised, the related
underwriting fees, the offering expenses and the prices at which
these shares were issued are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Proceeds
|
|
|
Underwriting
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
Issuances of Common Stock
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Raised
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
July 7, 2009
|
|
|
5,175,000
|
|
|
$
|
9.000
|
|
|
$
|
46,575
|
|
|
$
|
2,329
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
August 20, 2009(1)
|
|
|
3,449,686
|
|
|
$
|
8.500
|
|
|
$
|
29,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
September 24, 2009(1)
|
|
|
2,807,111
|
|
|
$
|
9.000
|
|
|
$
|
25,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
840
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Concurrent with the sale of these shares, we entered into a
registration rights agreement in which we granted the purchasers
certain registration rights with respect to the shares. We have
filed with the SEC a post-effective amendment to the
registration statement on
Form N-2
which has been declared effective by the SEC. |
Our shareholders equity accounts at December 31, 2009
and June 30, 2009 reflect cumulative shares issued as of
those respective dates. Our common stock has been issued through
public offerings, a registered direct offering, private
offerings, the exercise of over-allotment options on the part of
the underwriters, our dividend reinvestment plan and business
combinations. When our common stock is issued, the related
offering expenses have been charged against paid-in capital in
excess of par. All underwriting fees and offering expenses were
borne by us.
On December 2, 2009, we issued 8,444,068 shares of
common stock to acquire Patriot. This transaction is described
in further detail in Note 2.
On July 20, 2009 and October 19, 2009, we issued
shares of our common stock in connection with the dividend
reinvestment plan of 297,274 and 233,523, respectively.
On October 9, 2008, our Board of Directors approved a share
repurchase plan under which we may repurchase up to $20,000 of
our common stock at prices below our net asset value as reported
in our financial statements published for the year ended
June 30, 2008. We have not made any purchases of our common
stock during the period from October 9, 2008 to
December 31, 2009 pursuant to this plan.
F-32
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
|
|
Note 7.
|
Net
Decrease (Increase) in Net Assets per Common Share
|
The following information sets forth the computation of net
(decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations per
common share for the three and six months ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
(16,853
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,524
|
|
|
$
|
(23,231
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,522
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
57,613,489
|
|
|
|
29,618,762
|
|
|
|
53,709,197
|
|
|
|
29,569,571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations
per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8.
|
Related
Party Agreements and Transactions
|
Investment
Advisory Agreement
We have entered into an investment advisory and management
agreement with Prospect Capital Management (the Investment
Advisory Agreement) under which the Investment Adviser,
subject to the overall supervision of our Board of Directors,
manages the
day-to-day
operations of, and provides investment advisory services to us.
Under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, our
Investment Adviser: (i) determines the composition of our
portfolio, the nature and timing of the changes to our portfolio
and the manner of implementing such changes,
(ii) identifies, evaluates and negotiates the structure of
the investments we make (including performing due diligence on
our prospective portfolio companies); and (iii) closes and
monitors investments we make.
Prospect Capital Managements services under the Investment
Advisory Agreement are not exclusive, and it is free to furnish
similar services to other entities so long as its services to us
are not impaired. For providing these services the Investment
Adviser receives a fee from us, consisting of two components: a
base management fee and an incentive fee. The base management
fee is calculated at an annual rate of 2.00% on our gross assets
(including amounts borrowed). For services currently rendered
under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the base management fee
is payable quarterly in arrears. The base management fee is
calculated based on the average value of our gross assets at the
end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters and
appropriately adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases
during the current calendar quarter.
The total base management fees incurred to the favor of the
Investment Adviser for the three months ended December 31,
2009 and December 31, 2008 were $3,176, and $2,940,
respectively. The fees incurred for the six months ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were $6,385,
and $5,763, respectively.
The incentive fee has two parts. The first part, the income
incentive fee, is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears
based on our pre-incentive fee net investment income for the
immediately preceding calendar quarter. For this purpose,
pre-incentive fee net investment income means interest income,
dividend income and any other income (including any other fees
(other than fees for providing managerial assistance), such as
commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting
fees and other fees that we receive from portfolio companies)
accrued during the calendar quarter, minus our operating
expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee,
expenses payable under the Administration Agreement described
below, and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued
and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive
fee). Pre-incentive
F-33
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
fee net investment income includes, in the case of investments
with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue
discount, debt instruments with payment in kind interest and
zero coupon securities), accrued income that we have not yet
received in cash. Pre-incentive fee net investment income does
not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses
or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation.
Pre-incentive fee net investment income, expressed as a rate of
return on the value of our net assets at the end of the
immediately preceding calendar quarter, is compared to a
hurdle rate of 1.75% per quarter (7.00% annualized).
The net investment income used to calculate this part of the
incentive fee is also included in the amount of the gross assets
used to calculate the 2.00% base management fee. We pay the
Investment Adviser an income incentive fee with respect to our
pre-incentive fee net investment income in each calendar quarter
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
no incentive fee in any calendar quarter in which our
pre-incentive fee net investment income does not exceed the
hurdle rate;
|
|
|
|
100.00% of our pre-incentive fee net investment income with
respect to that portion of such pre-incentive fee net investment
income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than
125.00% of the quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar quarter
(8.75% annualized assuming a 7.00% annualized hurdle
rate); and
|
|
|
|
20.00% of the amount of our pre-incentive fee net investment
income, if any, that exceeds 125.00% of the quarterly hurdle
rate in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized assuming a 7.00%
annualized hurdle rate).
|
These calculations are appropriately prorated for any period of
less than three months and adjusted for any share issuances or
repurchases during the current quarter.
The second part of the incentive fee, the capital gains
incentive fee, is determined and payable in arrears as of the
end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment
Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date), and equals
20.00% of our realized capital gains for the calendar year, if
any, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized
capital depreciation at the end of such year. In determining the
capital gains incentive fee payable to the Investment Adviser,
we calculate the aggregate realized capital gains, aggregate
realized capital losses and aggregate unrealized capital
depreciation, as applicable, with respect to each investment
that has been in its portfolio. For the purpose of this
calculation, an investment is defined as the total
of all rights and claims which maybe asserted against a
portfolio company arising from our participation in the debt,
equity, and other financial instruments issued by that company.
Aggregate realized capital gains, if any, equals the sum of the
differences between the aggregate net sales price of each
investment and the aggregate cost basis of such investment when
sold or otherwise disposed. Aggregate realized capital losses
equal the sum of the amounts by which the aggregate net sales
price of each investment is less than the aggregate cost basis
of such investment when sold or otherwise disposed. Aggregate
unrealized capital depreciation equals the sum of the
differences, if negative, between the aggregate valuation of
each investment and the aggregate cost basis of such investment
as of the applicable calendar year-end . At the end of the
applicable calendar year, the amount of capital gains that
serves as the basis for our calculation of the capital gains
incentive fee involves netting aggregate realized capital gains
against aggregate realized capital losses on a since-inception
basis and then reducing this amount by the aggregate unrealized
capital depreciation. If this number is positive, then the
capital gains incentive fee payable is equal to 20.00% of such
amount, less the aggregate amount of any capital gains incentive
fees paid since inception.
For the three months ended December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, income incentive fees of $4,231 and
$2,990, respectively, were incurred. For the six months ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, income
incentive fees of $7,311 and $8,865, respectively, were
incurred. No capital gains incentive fees were incurred for the
three or six months ended December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008.
F-34
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
Administration
Agreement
We have also entered into an Administration Agreement with
Prospect Administration, LLC (Prospect
Administration) under which Prospect Administration, among
other things, provides (or arranges for the provision of)
administrative services and facilities for us. For providing
these services, we reimburse Prospect Administration for our
allocable portion of overhead incurred by Prospect
Administration in performing its obligations under the
Administration Agreement, including rent and our allocable
portion of the costs of our chief compliance officer and chief
financial officer and their respective staffs. For the three
months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the reimbursement
was approximately $840 and $588, respectively. For the six
months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the reimbursement
was approximately $1,680 and $1,176, respectively. Under this
agreement, Prospect Administration furnishes us with office
facilities, equipment and clerical, bookkeeping and record
keeping services at such facilities. Prospect Administration
also performs, or oversees the performance of, our required
administrative services, which include, among other things,
being responsible for the financial records that we are required
to maintain and preparing reports to our stockholders and
reports filed with the SEC. In addition, Prospect Administration
assists us in determining and publishing our net asset value,
overseeing the preparation and filing of our tax returns and the
printing and dissemination of reports to our stockholders, and
generally oversees the payment of our expenses and the
performance of administrative and professional services rendered
to us by others. Under the Administration Agreement, Prospect
Administration also provides on our behalf managerial assistance
to those portfolio companies to which we are required to provide
such assistance. The Administration Agreement may be terminated
by either party without penalty upon 60 days written
notice to the other party. Prospect Administration is a wholly
owned subsidiary of our Investment Adviser.
The Administration Agreement provides that, absent willful
misfeasance, bad faith or negligence in the performance of its
duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties and
obligations, Prospect Administration and its officers, managers,
partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and
any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to
indemnification from us for any damages, liabilities, costs and
expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees and amounts
reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of
Prospect Administrations services under the Administration
Agreement or otherwise as administrator for us.
Prospect Administration, pursuant to the approval of our Board
of Directors, engaged Vastardis Fund Services LLC
(Vastardis) to serve as our
sub-administrator
to perform certain services required of Prospect Administration.
Under the
sub-administration
agreement, Vastardis provided us with office facilities,
equipment, clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping services at
such facilities. Vastardis also conducted relations with
custodians, depositories, transfer agents, dividend disbursing
agents, other stockholder servicing agents, accountants,
attorneys, underwriters, brokers and dealers, corporate
fiduciaries, insurers, banks and such other persons in any such
other capacity deemed to be necessary or desirable. Vastardis
provided reports to the Administrator and the Directors of its
performance of obligations and furnished advice and
recommendations with respect to such other aspects of our
business and affairs as it shall determine to be desirable.
Under the
sub-administration
agreement, Vastardis also provided the service of William E.
Vastardis as our Chief Financial Officer (CFO). We
compensated Vastardis for providing us these services by the
payment of an asset-based fee with a $400 annual minimum,
payable monthly. Our service agreement was amended on
September 28, 2008 so that Mr. Vastardis no longer
served as our CFO effective as of November 11, 2008. At
that time, Brian H. Oswald, a managing director at Prospect
Administration, assumed the role of CFO.
We terminated our agreement with Vastardis to provide
sub-administration
services effective June 30, 2009. We entered into a new
consulting services agreement for the period from July 1,
2009 until the filing of our
Form 10-K
for the year ended June 30, 2009. We paid Vastardis a total
of $30 for services rendered in conjunction with preparation of
Form 10-K
under the new agreement. All services previously provided by
Vastardis were
F-35
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
assumed by Prospect Administration beginning on July 1,
2009 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010 and
thereafter.
Managerial
Assistance
As a business development company, we offer, and must provide
upon request, managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio
companies. This assistance could involve, among other things,
monitoring the operations of our portfolio companies,
participating in board and management meetings, consulting with
and advising officers of portfolio companies and providing other
organizational and financial guidance. We billed $260 and $215
of managerial assistance fees for the three months ended
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively, of
which $135 and $60 remains on the consolidated statement of
assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2009, and
June 30, 2009, respectively. We billed $461 and $431 of
managerial assistance fees for the six months ended
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively.
These fees are paid to the Administrator when received. We
simultaneously accrue a payable to the Administrator for the
same amounts, which remain on the consolidated statements of
assets and liabilities.
|
|
Note 9.
|
Financial
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Per Share Data(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
11.11
|
|
|
$
|
14.63
|
|
|
$
|
12.40
|
|
|
$
|
14.55
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
Net realized gain (loss)
|
|
|
(0.89
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.95
|
)
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.56
|
)
|
Net decrease in net assets as a result of public offerings and
DRIP issuance
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets as a result of shares issued for
Patriot acquisition
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
(0.82
|
)
|
|
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
|
(1.26
|
)
|
|
|
(0.82
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at end of period
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
14.43
|
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
$
|
14.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share market value at end of period
|
|
$
|
11.81
|
|
|
$
|
11.97
|
|
|
$
|
11.81
|
|
|
$
|
11.97
|
|
Total return based on market value(2)
|
|
|
14.09
|
%
|
|
|
(3.41
|
)%
|
|
|
37.87
|
%
|
|
|
(3.17
|
)%
|
Total return based on net asset value(2)
|
|
|
(6.32
|
)%
|
|
|
1.96
|
%
|
|
|
(12.87
|
)%
|
|
|
5.74
|
%
|
Shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
63,349,746
|
|
|
|
29,637,928
|
|
|
|
63,349,746
|
|
|
|
29,637,928
|
|
Average weighted shares outstanding for period
|
|
|
57,613,489
|
|
|
|
29,618,762
|
|
|
|
53,709,197
|
|
|
|
29,569,571
|
|
Ratio/Supplemental Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets at end of period (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
637,477
|
|
|
$
|
427,803
|
|
|
$
|
637,477
|
|
|
$
|
427,803
|
|
Annualized ratio of operating expenses to average net assets
|
|
|
7.65
|
%
|
|
|
9.34
|
%
|
|
|
7.24
|
%
|
|
|
10.14
|
%
|
Annualized ratio of net operating income to average net assets
|
|
|
10.91
|
%
|
|
|
11.33
|
%
|
|
|
9.77
|
%
|
|
|
16.86
|
%
|
F-36
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
|
|
Note 9:
|
Financial
Highlights (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
Per Share Data(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
14.55
|
|
|
$
|
15.04
|
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
Costs related to the initial public offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.21
|
)
|
Costs related to the secondary public offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
1.87
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
Realized (loss) gain
|
|
|
(1.24
|
)
|
|
|
(0.69
|
)
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
(0.52
|
)
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in net assets as a result of public
offering
|
|
|
(2.11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.95
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
(1.15
|
)
|
|
|
(1.59
|
)
|
|
|
(1.54
|
)
|
|
|
(1.12
|
)
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at end of period
|
|
$
|
12.40
|
|
|
$
|
14.55
|
|
|
|
15.04
|
|
|
|
15.31
|
|
|
|
14.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share market value at end of period
|
|
$
|
9.20
|
|
|
$
|
13.18
|
|
|
$
|
17.47
|
|
|
$
|
16.99
|
|
|
$
|
12.60
|
|
Total return based on market value(2)
|
|
|
(22.04
|
)%
|
|
|
(15.90
|
)%
|
|
|
12.65
|
%
|
|
|
44.90
|
%
|
|
|
(13.46
|
)%
|
Total return based on net asset value(2)
|
|
|
(4.81
|
)%
|
|
|
7.84
|
%
|
|
|
7.62
|
%
|
|
|
12.76
|
%
|
|
|
7.40
|
%
|
Shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
42,943,084
|
|
|
|
29,520,379
|
|
|
|
19,949,065
|
|
|
|
7,069,873
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
Average weighted shares outstanding for period
|
|
|
31,559,905
|
|
|
|
23,626,642
|
|
|
|
15,724,095
|
|
|
|
7,056,846
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
Ratio/Supplemental Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets at end of period
|
|
$
|
532,596
|
|
|
$
|
429,623
|
|
|
$
|
300,048
|
|
|
$
|
108,270
|
|
|
$
|
102,967
|
|
Annualized ratio of operating expenses to average net assets
|
|
|
9.03
|
%
|
|
|
9.62
|
%
|
|
|
7.36
|
%
|
|
|
8.19
|
%
|
|
|
5.52
|
%
|
Annualized ratio of net investment income to average net assets
|
|
|
13.14
|
%
|
|
|
12.66
|
%
|
|
|
9.71
|
%
|
|
|
7.90
|
%
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Financial highlights are based on weighted average shares. |
|
(2) |
|
Total return based on market value is based on the change in
market price per share between the opening and ending market
prices per share in each period and assumes that dividends are
reinvested in accordance with our dividend reinvestment plan.
Total return based on net asset value is based upon the change
in net asset value per share between the opening and ending net
asset values per share in each period and assumes that dividends
are reinvested in accordance with our dividend reinvestment plan. |
F-37
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
|
|
Note 10.
|
Revolving
Credit Agreements
|
On June 6, 2007, we closed on a $200,000 three-year
revolving credit facility (as amended on December 31,
2007) with Rabobank Nederland (Rabobank) as
administrative agent and sole lead arranger (the Rabobank
Facility). Until November 14, 2008, interest on the
Rabobank Facility was charged at LIBOR plus 175 basis
points; thereafter, under the terms of a commitment letter with
Rabobank to arrange and structure a new rated credit facility,
we agreed to an immediate increase in the current borrowing rate
on the Rabobank Facility to LIBOR plus 250 basis points.
Additionally, Rabobank charged a fee on the unused portion of
the facility. This fee is assessed at the rate of
37.5 basis points per annum of the amount of that unused
portion.
On June 25, 2009, we completed a first closing on an
expanded $250,000 revolving credit facility (the
Syndicated Facility). The new Syndicated Facility,
which had $195,000 and $175,000 total commitments as of
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively,
includes an accordion feature which allows the Syndicated
Facility to accept up to an aggregate total of $250,000 of
commitments for which we continue to solicit additional
commitments from other lenders for the additional $55,000 as of
December 31, 2009. The revolving period extends through
June 24, 2010. If not renewed or extended by the
participant banks, a one year amortization period would commence
whereby we may not borrow additional funds. Thereafter for ten
years, all principal, interest and fee payments received in
conjunction with collateral pledged to the Syndicated Facility,
less a monthly servicing fee payable to us, are required to be
used to repay outstanding borrowings under the Syndicated
Facility. Any remaining outstanding borrowings would be due and
payable on the commitment termination date, which is currently
June 24, 2011.
The Syndicated Facility contains restrictions pertaining to the
geographic and industry concentrations of funded loans, maximum
size of funded loans, interest rate payment frequency of funded
loans, maturity dates of funded loans and minimum equity
requirements. The Syndicated Facility also contains certain
requirements relating to portfolio performance, including
required minimum portfolio yield and limitations on
delinquencies and charge-offs, violation of which could result
in the early termination of the Syndicated Facility. The
Syndicated Facility also requires the maintenance of a minimum
liquidity requirement. At December 31, 2009 and
June 30, 2009, we were in compliance with the applicable
covenants.
Interest on borrowings under the credit facility is one-month
LIBOR plus 400 basis points, subject to a minimum Libor
floor of 200 basis points. Additionally, the banks charge a
fee on the unused portion of the credit facility equal to
100 basis points. As of December 31, 2009 and
June 30, 2009, we had $10,000 and $124,800 outstanding
under our credit facility, respectively. As of December 31,
2009 and June 30, 2009, $62,914 and $946 was available to
us for additional borrowing under our credit facility,
respectively. As we make additional investments which are
eligible to be pledged under the credit facility, we will
generate additional availability to the extent such investments
are eligible to be placed into the borrowing base. At
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, the investments
used as collateral for the Syndicated Facility had an aggregate
market value of $339,012 and $434,069, which represents 53.2%
and 81.5% of net assets, respectively.
In connection with the origination and amendment of the
Syndicated Facility, we incurred approximately $9,472 of fees
which are being amortized over the term of the facility.
|
|
Note 11.
|
Commitments
and Off-Balance Sheet Risks
|
From time to time, we provide guarantees for portfolio companies
for payments to counterparties, usually as an alternative to
investing additional capital. We provide indemnifications to
Prospect Administration in accordance with our respective
agreements with that service provider. These indemnifications
are described in further detail in Note 8. As of
December 31, 2009, no other material contingency agreements
exist.
F-38
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
From time to time, we may become involved in various
investigations, claims and legal proceedings that arise in the
ordinary course of our business. These matters may relate to
intellectual property, employment, tax, regulation, contract or
other matters. The resolution of these matters as they arise
will be subject to various uncertainties and, even if such
claims are without merit, could result in the expenditure of
significant financial and managerial resources.
On December 6, 2004, Dallas Gas Partners, L.P.
(DGP) served us with a complaint filed
November 30, 2004 in the U.S. District for the
Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division. DGP alleges that
DGP was defrauded and that we breached our fiduciary duty to DGP
and tortiously interfered with DGPs contract to purchase
Gas Solutions, Ltd. (a subsidiary of our portfolio company,
GSHI) in connection with our alleged agreement in September 2004
to loan DGP funds with which DGP intended to buy Gas Solutions,
Ltd. for approximately $26,000. The complaint sought relief not
limited to $100,000. On November 30, 2005,
U.S. Magistrate Judge John R. Froeschner of the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Galveston Division, issued a recommendation that the court grant
our Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing all claims by DGP. On
February 21, 2006, U.S. District Judge Samuel Kent of
the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Galveston Division issued an order granting our Motion for
Summary Judgment dismissing all claims by DGP, against us. On
May 16, 2007, the Court also granted us summary judgment on
DGPs liability to us on our counterclaim for DGPs
breach of a release and covenant not to sue. On January 4,
2008, the Court, Judge Melinda Harmon presiding, granted our
motion to dismiss all DGPs claims asserted against certain
of our officers and affiliates. On August 20, 2008, Judge
Harmon entered a Final Judgment dismissing all of DGPs
claims. DGP appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Fifth Circuit, which affirmed the Final Judgment on
June 24, 2009. DGP then moved for rehearing on July 8,
2009, which the Fifth Circuit denied on August 6, 2009. Our
damage claims against DGP remain pending.
In May 2006, based in part on unfavorable due diligence and the
absence of investment committee approval, we declined to extend
a loan for $10,000 to a potential borrower
(plaintiff). Plaintiff was subsequently sued by its
own attorney in a local Texas court for plaintiffs failure
to pay fees owed to its attorney. In December 2006, plaintiff
filed a cross-action against us and certain affiliates (the
defendants) in the same local Texas court, alleging,
among other things, tortuous interference with contract and
fraud. We petitioned the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York (the District Court)
to compel arbitration and to enjoin the Texas action. In
February 2007, our motions were granted. Plaintiff appealed that
decision. On July 24, 2008, the Second Circuit Court of
Appeals affirmed the judgment of the District Court. The
arbitration commenced in July 2007 and concluded in late
November 2007. Post-hearing briefings were completed in February
2008. On April 14, 2008, the arbitrator rendered an award
in our favor, rejecting all of plaintiffs claims. On
April 18, 2008, we filed a petition before the District
Court to confirm the award. On October 8, 2008, the
District Court granted the Companys petition to confirm
the award, confirmed the awards and subsequently entered
judgment thereon in favor of the Company in the amount of
$2,288. After filing a defective notice of appeal to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on
November 5, 2008, plaintiffs counsel resubmitted a
new notice of appeal on January 9, 2009. The plaintiff
subsequently requested that the Company agree to stipulate to
the withdrawal of plaintiffs appeal to the Second Circuit.
Such a stipulation was filed with the Second Circuit on or about
April 14, 2009. Based on this stipulation, the Second
Circuit issued a mandate terminating the appeal, which was
transmitted to the District Court on April 23, 2009.
Post-judgment discovery against plaintiff is continuing and we
have filed a motion for sanctions against plaintiffs
counsel. Argument for the motion for sanctions was held on
November 19, 2009 and a decision from the court is pending.
F-39
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
|
|
Note 13.
|
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
|
Investment Income
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
in Net Assets from Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Share(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Share(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Share(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Share(1)
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
6,432
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
$
|
3,274
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
690
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
3,964
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
8,171
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
4,493
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
(1,553
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
2,940
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
12,069
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
7,015
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
(2,039
|
)
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
4,976
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
14,009
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
8,349
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
(3,501
|
)
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
4,848
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
15,391
|
|
|
|
0.77
|
|
|
|
7,865
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
8,550
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
18,563
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
10,660
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
(14,346
|
)
|
|
|
(0.62
|
)
|
|
|
(3,686
|
)
|
|
|
(0.16
|
)
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
|
|
12,919
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
(14,178
|
)
|
|
|
(0.59
|
)
|
|
|
(1,259
|
)
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
23,448
|
|
|
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
13,669
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
10,317
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
23,986
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
September 30, 2008(2)
|
|
|
35,799
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
23,502
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
(9,504
|
)
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
13,998
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
22,213
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
11,960
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
(5,436
|
)
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
6,524
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
20,669
|
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
11,720
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
3,611
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
15,331
|
|
|
|
0.51
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
21,800
|
|
|
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
11,981
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
(12,730
|
)
|
|
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
|
(749
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
21,517
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
12,318
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
(18,696
|
)
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
|
(6,378
|
)
|
|
|
(0.13
|
)
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
28,883
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
16,925
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
(33,778
|
)
|
|
|
(0.59
|
)
|
|
|
(16,853
|
)
|
|
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Per share amounts are calculated using weighted average shares
during period. |
|
(2) |
|
Additional income for this quarter was driven by other
investment income from the settlement of net profits interests
on IEC Systems LP and Advanced Rig Services LLC. |
|
|
Note 14.
|
Subsequent
Events
|
On January 25, 2010, we issued 236,985 shares of our
common stock in connection with the dividend reinvestment plan.
On January 4, 2010, we completed a closing for an
additional $15,000 commitment to the Syndicated Facility,
increasing total commitments to $210,000.
Merger
Discussions with Allied Capital Corporation
On January 14, 2010, Prospect Capital delivered a proposal
letter to the Allied Capital Board (the First Prospect
Capital Merger Offer Letter) containing an offer to
acquire each outstanding Allied Capital Corporation
(Allied Capital) Share in exchange for 0.385 of a
share of Prospect Capital Common Stock (the First Prospect
Capital Merger Offer).
On January 19, 2010, Allied Capital filed a
Form 8-K
stating that the Allied Capital Board determined that the First
Prospect Capital Merger Offer did not constitute a
Superior Proposal as such term is defined in the
Ares Capital Merger Agreement.
On January 20, 2010, Prospect Capital issued a press
release containing a copy of a letter it subsequently sent to
the Allied Capital Board in connection with the First Prospect
Capital Merger Offer.
F-40
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
On January 26, 2010, Prospect Capital announced that it
delivered another letter to the Allied Capital Board, raising
its offer to acquire Allied Capital (the Second Prospect
Capital Merger Offer Letter).
On February 3, 2010, Allied Capital informed us and filed a
Form 8-K
stating that the Allied Capital Board determined that the Second
Prospect Capital Merger Offer did not constitute a
Superior Proposal as such term is defined in the
Ares Capital Merger Agreement.
On February 9, 2010, Prospect Capital announced that it
delivered another letter to the Allied Capital Board, raising
its offer to acquire Allied Capital (the Third Prospect
Capital Merger Offer Letter).
On February 11, 2010, Allied Capital informed us and filed
a
Form 8-K
stating that the Allied Capital Board determined that the Third
Prospect Capital Merger Offer did not constitute a
Superior Proposal as such term is defined in the
Ares Capital Merger Agreement. Prospect Capital has filed proxy
materials to solicit Allied Shareholders to vote against
Allieds proposed merger with Ares Capital Corporation.
F-41
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Prospect Capital Corporation
New York, New York
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of
assets and liabilities of Prospect Capital Corporation,
including the schedule of investments, as of June 30, 2009
and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
changes in net assets, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended June 30, 2009, and the financial
highlights for each of the periods presented. These financial
statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of
the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements and financial
highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and
financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit
also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements and
financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Prospect Capital
Corporation at June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended June 30, 2009, and the financial
highlights for each of the periods presented in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Prospect Capital Corporations internal control over
financial reporting as of June 30, 2009, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated
September 11, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
New York, New York
September 11, 2009
F-42
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS (NOTE 10)
|
Investments at fair value (net cost of $531,424 and $496,805,
respectively, Note 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments (net cost of $187,105 and $203,661,
respectively)
|
|
$
|
206,332
|
|
|
$
|
205,827
|
|
Affiliate investments (net cost of $33,544 and $5,609,
respectively)
|
|
|
32,254
|
|
|
|
6,043
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments (net cost of $310,775 and
$287,535,respectively)
|
|
|
308,582
|
|
|
|
285,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments at fair value
|
|
|
547,168
|
|
|
|
497,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in money market funds
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
9,942
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
Receivables for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
|
|
4,094
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
4,248
|
|
Loan principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Other
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
6,951
|
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
667,025
|
|
|
|
541,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
Credit facility payable (Note 10)
|
|
|
124,800
|
|
|
|
91,167
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,845
|
|
Due to Prospect Administration (Note 7)
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
695
|
|
Due to Prospect Capital Management (Note 7)
|
|
|
5,871
|
|
|
|
5,946
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
2,381
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
134,429
|
|
|
|
112,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
$
|
532,596
|
|
|
$
|
429,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share (100,000,000 and
100,000,000 common shares authorized, respectively; 42,943,084
and 29,520,379 issued and outstanding, respectively)
(Note 5)
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
Paid-in capital in excess of par
|
|
|
545,707
|
|
|
|
441,332
|
|
Undistributed net investment income
|
|
|
24,152
|
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
Accumulated realized losses on investments
|
|
|
(53,050
|
)
|
|
|
(13,972
|
)
|
Unrealized appreciation on investments
|
|
|
15,744
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
$
|
532,596
|
|
|
$
|
429,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value Per Share
|
|
$
|
12.40
|
|
|
$
|
14.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-43
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
Investment Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments (Net of foreign withholding tax of $166,
$230, and $178, respectively)
|
|
$
|
19,281
|
|
|
$
|
21,709
|
|
|
$
|
13,500
|
|
Affiliate investments (Net of foreign withholding tax of
$ , $70, and $237, respectively)
|
|
|
3,039
|
|
|
|
1,858
|
|
|
|
3,489
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
40,606
|
|
|
|
35,466
|
|
|
|
13,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
62,926
|
|
|
|
59,033
|
|
|
|
30,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
22,468
|
|
|
|
11,327
|
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
2,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividend income
|
|
|
22,793
|
|
|
|
12,033
|
|
|
|
6,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income: (Note 4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control/affiliate investments
|
|
|
1,249
|
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
13,513
|
|
|
|
7,213
|
|
|
|
4,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income
|
|
|
14,762
|
|
|
|
8,336
|
|
|
|
4,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Income
|
|
|
100,481
|
|
|
|
79,402
|
|
|
|
40,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base management fee (Note 7)
|
|
|
11,915
|
|
|
|
8,921
|
|
|
|
5,445
|
|
Income incentive fee (Note 7)
|
|
|
14,790
|
|
|
|
11,278
|
|
|
|
5,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment advisory fees
|
|
|
26,705
|
|
|
|
20,199
|
|
|
|
11,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and credit facility expenses
|
|
|
6,161
|
|
|
|
6,318
|
|
|
|
1,903
|
|
Sub-administration
fees (including former Chief Financial Officer and Chief
Compliance Officer)
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
859
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
Legal fees
|
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
2,503
|
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
Valuation services
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
Audit, compliance and tax related fees
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
Allocation of overhead from Prospect Administration (Note 7)
|
|
|
2,856
|
|
|
|
2,139
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
Insurance expense
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
Directors fees
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
Other general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
Excise taxes
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
41,318
|
|
|
|
34,289
|
|
|
|
17,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
59,163
|
|
|
|
45,113
|
|
|
|
23,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized (loss) gain on investments
|
|
|
(39,078
|
)
|
|
|
(16,222
|
)
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
investments
|
|
|
15,019
|
|
|
|
(1,300
|
)
|
|
|
(8,352
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
|
|
$
|
35,104
|
|
|
$
|
27,591
|
|
|
$
|
16,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations per share:
(Note 6 and Note 8)
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding:
|
|
|
31,559,905
|
|
|
|
23,626,642
|
|
|
|
15,724,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-44
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
(In
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Increase in Net Assets from Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
59,163
|
|
|
$
|
45,113
|
|
|
$
|
23,131
|
|
Net realized (loss) gain on investments
|
|
|
(39,078
|
)
|
|
|
(16,222
|
)
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
investments
|
|
|
15,019
|
|
|
|
(1,300
|
)
|
|
|
(8,352
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
|
|
|
35,104
|
|
|
|
27,591
|
|
|
|
16,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to Shareholders
|
|
|
(36,519
|
)
|
|
|
(39,513
|
)
|
|
|
(27,542
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Share Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from capital shares sold
|
|
|
100,304
|
|
|
|
140,249
|
|
|
|
197,558
|
|
Less: Offering costs of public share offerings
|
|
|
(1,023
|
)
|
|
|
(1,505
|
)
|
|
|
(874
|
)
|
Reinvestment of dividends
|
|
|
5,107
|
|
|
|
2,753
|
|
|
|
5,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Capital
ShareTransactions
|
|
|
104,388
|
|
|
|
141,497
|
|
|
|
202,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Increase in Net Assets:
|
|
|
102,973
|
|
|
|
129,575
|
|
|
|
191,778
|
|
Net assets at beginning of year
|
|
|
429,623
|
|
|
|
300,048
|
|
|
|
108,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets at End of Year
|
|
$
|
532,596
|
|
|
$
|
429,623
|
|
|
$
|
300,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Share Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares sold
|
|
|
12,942,500
|
|
|
|
9,400,000
|
|
|
|
12,526,650
|
|
Shares issued through reinvestment of dividends
|
|
|
480,205
|
|
|
|
171,314
|
|
|
|
352,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in capital share activity
|
|
|
13,422,705
|
|
|
|
9,571,314
|
|
|
|
12,879,192
|
|
Shares outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
29,520,379
|
|
|
|
19,949,065
|
|
|
|
7,069,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Outstanding at End of Year
|
|
|
42,943,084
|
|
|
|
29,520,379
|
|
|
|
19,949,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-45
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
(In
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
35,104
|
|
|
$
|
27,591
|
|
|
$
|
16,728
|
|
Net realized loss (gain) on investments
|
|
|
39,078
|
|
|
|
16,239
|
|
|
|
(1,947
|
)
|
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on
investments
|
|
|
(15,019
|
)
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
8,352
|
|
Accretion of original issue discount on investments
|
|
|
(2,399
|
)
|
|
|
(2,095
|
)
|
|
|
(1,808
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
Change in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for purchases of investments
|
|
|
(98,305
|
)
|
|
|
(311,947
|
)
|
|
|
(167,255
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of investments and collection of investment
principal
|
|
|
27,007
|
|
|
|
127,212
|
|
|
|
38,407
|
|
Purchases of cash equivalents
|
|
|
(39,999
|
)
|
|
|
(274,949
|
)
|
|
|
(259,887
|
)
|
Sales of cash equivalents
|
|
|
39,999
|
|
|
|
274,932
|
|
|
|
259,885
|
|
Net (increase) decrease investments in money market funds
|
|
|
(65,735
|
)
|
|
|
8,760
|
|
|
|
(40,152
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in interest receivable, net
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
(1,955
|
)
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in dividends receivable
|
|
|
4,220
|
|
|
|
(3,985
|
)
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in loan principal receivable
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
385
|
|
Decrease in receivable for securities sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
Decrease in receivable for structuring fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in due from Prospect Administration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Decrease in due from Prospect Capital Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Increase in other receivables
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
(1,896
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
(394
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in payables for securities purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,000
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
Increase in due to Prospect Administration
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
(Decrease) increase in due to Prospect Capital Management
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
1,438
|
|
|
|
3,763
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,277
|
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
|
469
|
|
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities
|
|
|
(863
|
)
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities:
|
|
|
(74,000
|
)
|
|
|
(204,025
|
)
|
|
|
(143,890
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under credit facility
|
|
|
100,157
|
|
|
|
238,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments under credit facility
|
|
|
(66,524
|
)
|
|
|
(147,325
|
)
|
|
|
(28,500
|
)
|
Financing costs paid and deferred
|
|
|
(6,270
|
)
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
|
|
(2,660
|
)
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
100,304
|
|
|
|
140,249
|
|
|
|
197,558
|
|
Offering costs from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
(1,023
|
)
|
|
|
(1,505
|
)
|
|
|
(874
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(43,257
|
)
|
|
|
(24,915
|
)
|
|
|
(21,634
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities:
|
|
|
83,387
|
|
|
|
204,580
|
|
|
|
143,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Increase in Cash
|
|
|
9,387
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Balance at End of Year
|
|
$
|
9,942
|
|
|
$
|
555
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Paid For Interest
|
|
$
|
5,014
|
|
|
$
|
4,942
|
|
|
$
|
639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Financing Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of shares issued in connection with dividend reinvestment
plan
|
|
$
|
5,107
|
|
|
$
|
2,753
|
|
|
$
|
5,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-46
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
June 30,
2009 and June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Ownership%
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Control Investments (25.00% or greater of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ajax Rolled Ring & Machine
|
|
South Carolina/
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted common shares (7 total unrestricted common shares
issued and outstanding and 681.85 restricted common shares
issued and outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Series A convertible preferred shares (7,192.6 total
preferred shares issued and outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
6,142.6
|
|
|
|
6,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Subordinated secured note Tranche B,11.50% plus
6.00% PIK, 4/01/2013(3),(4)
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,675
|
|
|
|
11,675
|
|
|
|
10,151
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
Senior secured note Tranche A, 10.50%,
4/01/2013(3),(5)
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,487
|
|
|
|
21,487
|
|
|
|
21,487
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,219
|
|
|
|
31,638
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C&J Cladding LLC
|
|
Texas/Metal
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant, common units, expiring 3/30/2014 (1,000 total company
units outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
3,825
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 14.00%, 3/30/2012(3),(6)
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
3,308
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,302
|
|
|
|
7,133
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. (CCEHI)(7)
|
|
Maine/Biomass
Power
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCEHI common shares (1,000 total common shares issued and
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.(3),(8)
|
|
Texas/Gas
Gathering and
Processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares (100 total common shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
5,003
|
|
|
|
55,187
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
Junior secured note, 18.00%, 12/23/2018
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 18.00%, 12/22/2018
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,003
|
|
|
|
85,187
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated Contract Services, Inc.(9)
|
|
North Carolina/
Contracting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock (100 total common shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Series A preferred shares (10 total Series A preferred
shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Junior secured note, stated rate 7.00% plus 7.00% PIK plus 6.00%
default interest, in non-accrual status effective 10/09/2007,
past due
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,003
|
|
|
|
14,003
|
|
|
|
3,030
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Senior secured note, stated rate 7.00% plus 7.00% PIK plus 6.00%
default interest, in non-accrual status effective 10/09/2007,
past due
|
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Senior demand note, 15.00%, 6/30/2009(10)
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,652
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.
|
|
Alberta, Canada/
Production
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares (2,231 total class A common shares
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
1,781
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
F-47
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
June 30,
2009 and June 30,
2008 (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Ownership%
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Senior secured note, 15.00%, 12/31/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,250
|
|
|
$
|
9,250
|
|
|
$
|
3,004
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Bridge loan, 15.00% plus 3.00% PIK, 12/31/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,826
|
|
|
$
|
9,826
|
|
|
$
|
9,602
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,344
|
|
|
|
12,606
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRG Manufacturing, Inc.
|
|
Texas/
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares (1,000 total common shares issued and outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
|
|
19,294
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 16.50%, 8/31/2011(3),(11)
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,397
|
|
|
|
32,374
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R-V Industries, Inc.
|
|
Pennsylvania/
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares (750,000 total common shares issued and
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
545,107
|
|
|
|
5,086
|
|
|
|
12,267
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
Warrants, common shares, expiring 6/30/2017 (200,000 total
common shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,768
|
|
|
|
16,767
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
Yatesville Coal Holdings, Inc.(12)
|
|
Kentucky/ Mining
and Coal
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock (1,000 total common shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Junior secured note, 15.72%, in non-accrual status effective
1/01/2009, matures 12/31/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
38,463
|
|
|
|
38,463
|
|
|
|
3,097
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 15.72%, in non-accrual status effective
1/01/2009, matures 12/31/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,890
|
|
|
|
13,097
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Control Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,105
|
|
|
|
206,332
|
|
|
|
38.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate Investments (5.00% to 24.99% of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appalachian Energy Holdings LLC(13)
|
|
West Virginia/
Construction
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants Class A common units, expiring
2/13/2016 (86,843 total fully-diluted class A common units
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
6,065
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Warrants Class A common units, expiring
6/17/2018 (86,843 total fully-diluted class A common units
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
6,025
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Warrants Class A common units, expiring
11/30/2018 (86,843 total fully-diluted class A common units
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Series A preferred equity (1,075 total series A
preferred equity units outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Series B preferred equity (794 total series B
preferred equity units outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Series C preferred equity (500 total series C
preferred equity units outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior Secured Debt Tranche B, 14.00% plus 3.00% PIK plus
3.00% default interest, non-accrual status effective 11/01/2008,
past due
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,050
|
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
F-48
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
June 30,
2009 and June 30,
2008 (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Ownership%
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Senior Secured Debt Tranche A, 14.00% plus 3.00% PIK plus
3.00% default interest, non-accrual status effective 11/01/2008,
matures 1/31/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,997
|
|
|
$
|
1,891
|
|
|
$
|
2,052
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,017
|
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biotronic Neuro Network
|
|
Michigan/
Healthcare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares (85,000 total preferred shares outstanding)(14)
|
|
|
|
|
9,925.455
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
2,839
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 11.50% plus 1.00% PIK, 2/21/2013(3),(15)
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,227
|
|
|
|
26,227
|
|
|
|
27,007
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,527
|
|
|
|
29,846
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,544
|
|
|
|
32,254
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate Investments (less than 5.00% of
voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Gilsonite Company
|
|
Utah/Specialty
Minerals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership interest units in AGC PEP, LLC(16)
|
|
|
|
|
99.9999
|
%
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
3,851
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
Senior subordinated note, 12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, 3/14/2013(3)
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,783
|
|
|
|
14,783
|
|
|
|
15,073
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,814
|
|
|
|
18,924
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Castro Cheese Company, Inc.(3)
|
|
Texas/Food
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior secured note, 11.00% plus 2.00% PIK, 2/28/2013
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,538
|
|
|
|
7,413
|
|
|
|
7,637
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conquest Cherokee, LLC(17)
|
|
Tennessee/Oil and
Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overriding Royalty Interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 13.00%, in non-accrual status effective
4/01/2009 plus 4.00% default interest, past due(18)
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,200
|
|
|
|
10,191
|
|
|
|
6,855
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,191
|
|
|
|
7,420
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deb Shops, Inc.(19)
|
|
Pennsylvania/
Retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second lien debt, 8.67%, 10/23/2014
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
14,623
|
|
|
$
|
6,272
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diamondback Operating, LP
|
|
Oklahoma/Oil and
Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net profits interest, 15.00% payable on equity distributions(20)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freedom Marine Services LLC(3),(21)
|
|
Louisiana/
Shipping Vessels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net profits interest, 22.50% payable on equity distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated secured note, 12.00% plus 4.00% PIK, 12/31/2011(22)
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,234
|
|
|
|
7,160
|
|
|
|
7,152
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,160
|
|
|
|
7,381
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H&M Oil & Gas, LLC(3),(21)
|
|
Texas/Oil and Gas
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-49
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
June 30,
2009 and June 30,
2008 (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Ownership%
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Net profits interest, 8.00% payable on equity distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 13.00%, 6/30/2010(23)
|
|
|
|
$
|
49,688
|
|
|
$
|
49,688
|
|
|
$
|
49,697
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,688
|
|
|
|
51,379
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IEC Systems LP (IEC) /Advanced Rig Services LLC
(ARS)(3),(24)
|
|
Texas/Oilfield
Fabrication
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IEC senior secured note, 12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, 11/20/2012
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,411
|
|
|
|
21,411
|
|
|
|
21,839
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
ARS senior secured note, 12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, 11/20/2012
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,836
|
|
|
|
12,836
|
|
|
|
13,092
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,247
|
|
|
|
34,931
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maverick Healthcare, LLC
|
|
Arizona/
Healthcare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units (79,000,000 total class A common units
outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Preferred units (79,000,000 total preferred units outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Second lien debt, 12.00% plus 1.50% PIK, 4/30/2014(3)
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,691
|
|
|
|
12,691
|
|
|
|
12,816
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,943
|
|
|
|
14,116
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miller Petroleum, Inc.(25)
|
|
Tennessee/Oil and
Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, common shares, expiring 5/04/2010 to 6/30/2014
(15,811,856 total common shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
1,935,523
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peerless Manufacturing Co.(3)
|
|
Texas/
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated secured note, 11.50% plus 3.50%PIK, 4/29/2013
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,400
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualitest Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(3),(26)
|
|
Alabama/
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second lien debt, 8.10%, 4/30/2015
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
11,949
|
|
|
|
11,452
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Management Corp.(3)
|
|
South Carolina/
Financial Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second lien debt, 12.00% plus 2.00% PIK, 6/29/2012
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,424
|
|
|
|
25,424
|
|
|
|
23,073
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resco Products, Inc.(3),(27)
|
|
Pennsylvania/
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second lien debt, 8.67%, 6/22/2014
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,750
|
|
|
|
9,594
|
|
|
|
9,750
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shearers Foods, Inc.
|
|
Ohio/Food
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership interest units in Mistral Chip Holdings, LLC (45,300
total membership units outstanding)(28)
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
3,419
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Second lien debt, 14.00%, 10/31/2013(3)
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
18,360
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
21,779
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stryker Energy, LLC(29)
|
|
Ohio/Oil and Gas
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overriding Royalty Interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,918
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
F-50
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
June 30,
2009 and June 30,
2008 (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Ownership%
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Subordinated secured revolving credit facility, 12.00%,
12/01/2011(3),(30)
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,500
|
|
|
$
|
29,154
|
|
|
$
|
29,554
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,154
|
|
|
|
32,472
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TriZetto Group(3)
|
|
California/
Healthcare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated unsecured note, 12.00% plus 1.50% PIK, 10/01/2016
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,205
|
|
|
|
15,065
|
|
|
|
16,331
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unitek(3),(31)
|
|
Pennsylvania/
Technical Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second lien debt, 13.08%, 12/31/2013
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
11,360
|
|
|
|
11,730
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wind River Resources Corp. and Wind River II Corp.(21)
|
|
Utah/Oil and Gas
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net profits interest, 5.00% payable on equity distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note, stated rate 13.00% plus 3.00% default
interest, in non-accrual status effective 12/01/2008, matures
7/31/2010(32)
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
12,644
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
12,836
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-control/Non-affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310,775
|
|
|
|
308,582
|
|
|
|
57.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
531,424
|
|
|
|
547,168
|
|
|
|
102.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fidelity Institutional Money Market Funds -Government Portfolio
(Class I)
|
|
|
|
|
94,752,972
|
|
|
|
94,753
|
|
|
|
94,753
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fidelity Institutional Money Market Funds -Government Portfolio
(Class I)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
3,982,278
|
|
|
|
3,982
|
|
|
|
3,982
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Money Market Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
630,159
|
|
|
$
|
645,903
|
|
|
|
121.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control Investments (25.00% or greater of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ajax Rolled Ring & Machine
|
|
South Carolina/
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted common shares (7 total unrestricted common shares
issued and outstanding and 803.18 restricted common shares
issued and outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Series A convertible preferred shares (7,222.6 total
preferred shares issued and outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
6,142.6
|
|
|
|
6,293
|
|
|
|
6,293
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
Subordinated secured note Tranche B,11.50% plus
6.00% PIK, 4/01/2013(3),(4)
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
Senior secured note Tranche A, 10.50%,
4/01/2013(3),(5)
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,890
|
|
|
|
21,890
|
|
|
|
21,890
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,683
|
|
|
|
39,683
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C&J Cladding LLC(3)
|
|
Texas/Metal
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant, common units, expiring 3/30/2014 (600 total company
units outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
2,222
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 14.00%, 3/30/2012(6)
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,800
|
|
|
|
4,085
|
|
|
|
4,607
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-51
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
June 30,
2009 and June 30,
2008 (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Ownership%
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,665
|
|
|
|
6,829
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.(8)
|
|
Texas/Gas
Gathering and
Processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares (100 total common shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
5,221
|
|
|
|
41,542
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
Subordinated secured note, 18.00%, 12/22/2009(3)
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,221
|
|
|
|
61,542
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated Contract Services, Inc.(9)
|
|
North Carolina/
Contracting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock (100 total common shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Series A preferred shares (10 total Series A preferred
shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Junior secured note, 14.00%, 9/30/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,003
|
|
|
|
14,003
|
|
|
|
3,030
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 14.00%, 9/30/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Senior demand note, 15.00%, 6/30/2009(10)
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,464
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.
|
|
Alberta,
Canada/
Production
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares (1,093 total common shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Warrants for common shares(33)
|
|
|
|
|
1,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 15.00%, 4/19/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,250
|
|
|
|
9,094
|
|
|
|
9,073
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
Bridge loan, 15.00% plus 3.00% PIK, 12/11/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,465
|
|
|
|
11,182
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRG Manufacturing, Inc.
|
|
Texas/
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares (1,000 total common shares issued and outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
|
|
8,656
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 16.50%, 8/31/2011(3),(11)
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,397
|
|
|
|
21,736
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R-V Industries, Inc.
|
|
Pennsylvania/
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares (800,000 total common shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
545,107
|
|
|
|
5,031
|
|
|
|
8,064
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
Warrants, common shares, expiring 6/30/2017
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
2,959
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 15.00%, 6/30/2017(3)
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,526
|
|
|
|
5,912
|
|
|
|
7,526
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,625
|
|
|
|
18,549
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worcester Energy Partners, Inc.(7)
|
|
Maine/
Biomass Power
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 12.50%, 12/31/2012
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,388
|
|
|
|
37,264
|
|
|
|
15,579
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,721
|
|
|
|
15,580
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yatesville Coal Holdings, Inc.(12)
|
|
Kentucky/
Mining and Coal
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-52
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
June 30,
2009 and June 30,
2008 (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Ownership%
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Common stock (1,000 total common shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
284
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Junior secured note, 12.50%, 12/31/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,136
|
|
|
|
30,136
|
|
|
|
15,726
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 12.50%, 12/31/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,420
|
|
|
|
25,726
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Control Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,661
|
|
|
|
205,827
|
|
|
|
48.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate Investments (5.00% to 24.99% of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appalachian Energy Holdings LLC(3),(13)
|
|
West Virginia/
Construction
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants Class A common units, expiring
2/13/2016 (49,753 total class A common units outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
12,090
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Series A preferred equity (16,125 total series A
preferred equity units outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Series B preferred equity (794 total series B
preferred equity units outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior Secured Debt Tranche A, 14.00% plus 3.00% PIK,
1/31/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,003
|
|
|
|
3,003
|
|
|
|
3,003
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
Senior Secured Debt Tranche B, 14.00% plus 3.00% PIK,
05/01/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,945
|
|
|
|
1,945
|
|
|
|
2,084
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,609
|
|
|
|
6,043
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,609
|
|
|
|
6,043
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate Investments (less than 5.00% of voting
control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Gilsonite Company
|
|
Utah/Specialty
Minerals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership interest units in AGC/PEP, LLC(16)
|
|
|
|
|
99.9999
|
%
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Senior subordinated note, 12.00% plus 3.00%, 3/14/2013(3)
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,632
|
|
|
|
14,632
|
|
|
|
14,632
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,632
|
|
|
|
15,632
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conquest Cherokee, LLC(3), (17),(18)
|
|
Tennessee/Oil
and Gas
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note, 13.00%, 5/05/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,200
|
|
|
|
10,125
|
|
|
|
9,923
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deb Shops, Inc.(3),(19)
|
|
Pennsylvania/
Retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second lien debt, 10.69%, 10/23/2014
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
14,577
|
|
|
|
13,428
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deep Down, Inc.(3)
|
|
Texas/
Production
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant, common shares, expiring 8/06/2012(174,732,501 total
common shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
4,960,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,856
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diamondback Operating, LP(3),(21)
|
|
Oklahoma/
Oil and Gas
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-53
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
June 30,
2009 and June 30,
2008 (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Ownership%
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Senior secured note, 12.00% plus 2.00% PIK, 8/28/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,200
|
|
|
$
|
9,200
|
|
|
$
|
9,108
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freedom Marine Services LLC(3), (21),(22)
|
|
Louisiana/
Shipping Vessels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated secured note, 12.00% plus 4.00% PIK, 12/31/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,948
|
|
|
|
6,850
|
|
|
|
6,805
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H&M Oil & Gas, LLC(3), (21),(23)
|
|
Texas/Oil
and Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note, 13.00%, 6/30/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
50,500
|
|
|
|
50,500
|
|
|
|
50,500
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IEC Systems LP (IEC)/Advanced Rig Services LLC
(ARS)(3),(24)
|
|
Texas/Oilfield
Fabrication
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IEC senior secured note, 12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, 11/20/2012
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,028
|
|
|
|
19,028
|
|
|
|
19,028
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
ARS senior secured note, 12.00% plus 3.00% PIK, 11/20/2012
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,825
|
|
|
|
5,825
|
|
|
|
5,825
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,853
|
|
|
|
24,853
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maverick Healthcare, LLC(3)
|
|
Arizona/
Healthcare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units (78,100,000 total common units outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Preferred units (78,100,000 total preferred units outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 12.00% plus 1.50% PIK, 10/13/2014
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,752
|
|
|
|
13,752
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miller Petroleum, Inc.
|
|
Tennessee/
Oil and Gas
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, common shares, expiring 5/04/2010 to 3/31/2013
(14,566,856 total common shares outstanding)
|
|
|
|
|
1,571,191
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peerless Manufacturing Co.(3)
|
|
Texas/
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated secured note, 11.50% plus 3.50% PIK, 4/30/2013
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualitest Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(3),(26)
|
|
Alabama/
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second lien debt, 12.45%, 4/30/2015
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
11,944
|
|
|
|
11,523
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Management Corp.(3)
|
|
South Carolina/
Financial
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated secured note, 12.00% plus 2.00% PIK, 6/29/2012
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
23,699
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resco Products, Inc.(3),(27)
|
|
Pennsylvania/
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second lien debt, 11.06%, 6/24/2014
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,750
|
|
|
|
9,574
|
|
|
|
9,574
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shearers Foods, Inc.
|
|
Ohio/Food
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-54
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
June 30,
2009 and June 30,
2008 (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Ownership%
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Mistral Chip Holdings, LLC membership unit (45,300 total
membership units outstanding)(28)
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Second lien debt, 14.00%, 10/31/2013(3)
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
17,351
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
19,351
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stryker Energy, LLC(3), (29),(30)
|
|
Ohio/Oil
and Gas
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated revolving credit facility, 12.00%, 11/30/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,500
|
|
|
|
29,041
|
|
|
|
28,518
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unitek(3),(31)
|
|
Pennsylvania/
Technical Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second lien debt, 12.75%, 12/27/2012
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
11,337
|
|
|
|
11,337
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wind River Resources Corp. and Wind River II Corp.(3),
(21),(32)
|
|
Utah/Oil
and Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note, 13.00%, 7/31/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
14,690
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-control/Non-affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,535
|
|
|
|
285,660
|
|
|
|
66.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496,805
|
|
|
|
497,530
|
|
|
|
115.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fidelity Institutional Money Market Funds -Government Portfolio
(Class I)
|
|
|
|
|
25,954,531
|
|
|
|
25,954
|
|
|
|
25,954
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First American Funds, Inc. Prime Obligations Fund
(Class A)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
7,045,610
|
|
|
|
7,046
|
|
|
|
7,046
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Money Market Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
529,805
|
|
|
$
|
530,530
|
|
|
|
123.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-55
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
June 30,
2009 and June 30,
2008 (Continued)
Endnote
Explanations for the Consolidated Schedules of Investments as of
June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The securities in which Prospect Capital Corporation
(we, us or our) has invested
were acquired in transactions that were exempt from registration
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Act. These securities may be resold only
in transactions that are exempt from registration under the
Securities Act. |
|
(2) |
|
Fair value is determined by or under the direction of our Board
of Directors (see Note 2). |
|
(3) |
|
Security, or portion thereof, is held as collateral for the
credit facility with Rabobank Nederland (see Note 11). The
market values of these investments at June 30, 2009 and
June 30, 2008 were $434,069 and $376,463, respectively;
they represent 67.2% and 71.0% of total investments at fair
value, respectively. |
|
(4) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 11.5% or
3-month
LIBOR plus 8.5%; rate reflected is as of the reporting
date June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable. |
|
(5) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 10.5% or
3-month
LIBOR plus 7.5%; rate reflected is as of the reporting
date June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable. |
|
(6) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 14.0% or
12-Month
LIBOR plus 7.5%; rate reflected is as of the reporting
date June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable. |
|
(7) |
|
There are several entities involved in the Biomass investment.
We own 100 shares of common stock in Worcester Energy
Holdings, Inc. (WEHI), representing 100% of the
issued and outstanding common stock. WEHI, in turn, owns 51
membership certificates in Biochips LLC (Biochips),
which represents a 51% ownership stake. |
|
|
|
We own 282 shares of common stock in Worcester Energy Co.,
Inc. (WECO), which represents 51% of the issued and
outstanding common stock. We own directly 1,665 shares of
common stock in Change Clean Energy Inc. (CCEI),
f/k/a Worcester Energy Partners, Inc., which represents 51% of
the issued and outstanding common stock and the remaining 49% is
owned by WECO. CCEI owns 100 shares of common stock in
Precision Logging and Landclearing, Inc.
(Precision), which represents 100% of the issued and
outstanding common stock. |
|
|
|
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we created two new
entities in anticipation of the foreclosure proceedings against
the co-borrowers (WECO, CCEI and Biochips) Change Clean Energy
Holdings, Inc. (CCEHI) and DownEast Power Company,
LLC (DEPC). We own 1,000 shares of CCEHI,
representing 100% of the issued and outstanding stock, which in
turn, owns a 100% of the membership interests in DEPC. |
|
|
|
On March 11, 2009, we foreclosed on the assets formerly
held by CCEI and Biochips with a successful credit bid of $6,000
to acquire the assets. The assets were subsequently assigned to
DEPC. |
|
|
|
WECO, CCEI and Biochips are joint borrowers on the term note
issued to Prospect Capital. Effective July 1, 2008, this
loan was placed on non-accrual status. |
|
|
|
Biochips, WECO, CCEI, Precision and WEHI currently have no
material operations and no significant assets. As of
June 30, 2009, our Board of Directors assessed a fair value
of $0 for all of these equity positions and the loan position.
We have determined that the impairment of both CCEI and CCEHI as
of June 30, 2009 is other than temporary and have recorded
a realized loss for the amount that the amortized cost exceeds
the fair value at June 30, 2009. Our Board of Directors set
the value of the remaining CCEHI investment at $2,530 at
June 30, 2009. |
|
(8) |
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc. is a wholly-owned investment of us. |
|
(9) |
|
Entity was formed as a result of the debt restructuring of ESA
Environmental Specialist, Inc. In early 2009, we foreclosed on
the two loans on non-accrual status and purchased the underlying
personal and real property. We own 1,000 shares of common
stock in The Healing Staff (THS), f/k/a Lisamarie
Fallon, Inc. representing |
F-56
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
June 30,
2009 and June 30,
2008 (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
100% ownership. We own 1,500 shares of Vets Securing
America, Inc. (VSA), representing 100% ownership.
VSA is a holding company for the real property of Integrated
Contract Services, Inc. (ICS) purchased during the
foreclosure process. |
|
(10) |
|
Loan is with THS an affiliate of ICS. |
|
(11) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 16.5% or
12-Month
LIBOR plus 11.0%; rate reflected is as of the reporting
date June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable. |
|
(12) |
|
On June 30, 2008, we consolidated our holdings in four coal
companies into Yatesville Coal Holdings, Inc.
(Yatesville), and consolidated the operations under
one management team. In the transaction, the debt that we held
of C&A Construction, Inc. (C&A), Genesis
Coal Corp. (Genesis), North Fork Collieries LLC
(North Fork) and Unity Virginia Holdings LLC
(Unity) were exchanged for newly issued debt from
Yatesville, and our ownership interests in C&A, E&L
Construction, Inc. (E&L), Whymore Coal Company
Inc. (Whymore), Genesis and North Fork were
exchanged for 100% of the equity of Yatesville. This
reorganization allows for a better utilization of the assets in
the consolidated group. |
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009 and at June 30, 2008, Yatesville
owned 100% of the membership interest of North Fork. In
addition, Yatesville held a $8,062 and $5,721, respectively,
note receivable from North Fork as of those two respective dates. |
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009 and at June 30, 2008, Yatesville
owned 87% and 75%, respectively, of the common stock of Genesis
and held a note receivable of $20,802 and $17,692, respectively,
as of those two respective dates. |
|
|
|
Yatesville held a note receivable of $4,261 and $3,902,
respectively, from Unity at June 30, 2009 and at
June 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
There are several entities involved in Yatesvilles
investment in Whymore at June 30, 2009 and at June 30,
2008. As of those two respective dates, Yatesville owned
10,000 shares of common stock or 100% of the equity and
held a $14,973 and $12,822, respectively, senior secured debt
receivable from C&A, which owns the equipment. Yatesville
owned 10,000 shares of common stock or 100% of the equity
of E&L, which leases the equipment from C&A, employs
the workers, is listed as the operator with the Commonwealth of
Kentucky, mines the coal, receives revenues and pays all
operating expenses. Yatesville owns 4,900 shares of common
stock or 49% of the equity of Whymore, which applies for and
holds permits on behalf of E&L. Yatesville also owned 4,285
Series A convertible preferred shares in each of C&A,
E&L and Whymore. Additionally, Yatesville retains an option
to purchase the remaining 51% of Whymore. Whymore and E&L
are guarantors under the C&A credit agreement with
Yatesville. |
|
(13) |
|
There are several entities involved in the Appalachian Energy
Holdings LLC (AEH) investment. We own warrants, the
exercise of which will permit us to purchase 15,215 units
of Class A common units of AEH at a nominal cost and in
near-immediate fashion. We own 200 units of Series A
preferred equity, 241 units of Series B preferred
equity, and 62.5 units of Series C preferred equity of AEH.
The senior secured notes are with C&S Operating LLC and
East Cumberland L.L.C., both operating companies owned by AEH. |
|
(14) |
|
On a fully diluted basis represents, 11.677% of voting common
shares. |
|
(15) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 11.5% or
6-month
LIBOR plus 7.0%; rate reflected is as of the reporting
date June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable. |
|
(16) |
|
We own 99.9999% of AGC/PEP, LLC. AGC/PEP, LLC owns 2,038 out of
a total of 65,232 shares of American Gilsonite Holding
Company which owns 100% of American Gilsonite Company. |
|
(17) |
|
In addition to the stated returns, we also hold overriding
royalty interests on which we receive payment based upon
operations of the borrower and net profits interest of 10.00% on
equity distributions which will be realized upon sale of the
borrower or a sale of the interests. |
|
(18) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 13.0% or
12-Month
LIBOR plus 7.5% not to exceed 14.50%; rate reflected is as of
the reporting date June 30, 2009 or
June 30, 2008, as applicable. |
F-57
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
June 30,
2009 and June 30,
2008 (Continued)
|
|
|
(19) |
|
Interest rate is
3-Month
LIBOR plus 8.0%; rate reflected is as of the reporting
date June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable. |
|
(20) |
|
In January 2009, our loan was repaid in full and we retained a
15.0% net profits interest payable on equity distributions. |
|
(21) |
|
In addition to the stated returns, we also hold net profits
interest which will be realized upon sale of the borrower or a
sale of the interests. |
|
(22) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 12.0% or
3-Month
LIBOR plus 6.11%; rate reflected is as of the reporting
date June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable. |
|
(23) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 13.0% or
12-Month
LIBOR plus 7.5%; rate reflected is as of the reporting
date June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable. |
|
(24) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 12.0% or
12-month
LIBOR plus 6.0%; rate reflected is as of the reporting
date June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable. |
|
(25) |
|
Total common shares outstanding of 15,811,856 as of
March 11, 2009 from Miller Petroleum, Inc.s Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on March 16, 2009. |
|
(26) |
|
Interest rate is
3-Month
LIBOR plus 7.5%; rate reflected is as of the reporting
date June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable. |
|
(27) |
|
Interest rate is
3-Month
LIBOR plus 8.0%; rate reflected is as of the reporting
date June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable. |
|
(28) |
|
Mistral Chip Holdings, LLC owns 45,300 shares out of 50,500
total shares outstanding of Chip Holdings, Inc., the parent
company of Shearers Foods, Inc. |
|
(29) |
|
In addition to the stated returns, we also hold overriding
royalty interests on which we receive payment based upon
operations of the borrower. |
|
(30) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 12.0% or
12-Month
LIBOR plus 7.0%; rate reflected is as of the reporting
date June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable. |
|
(31) |
|
As of June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, interest rate
is the greater of 13.08% and 12.75%, respectively, or
3-Month
LIBOR plus 7.25%; rate reflected is as of the reporting
date June 30, 2009 or June 30, 2008, as
applicable. |
|
(32) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 13.0% or
12-month
LIBOR plus 7.5% not to exceed 14.0%; rate reflected is as of the
reporting date June 30, 2009 or June 30,
2008, as applicable. |
|
(33) |
|
The number of these warrants which are exercisable is contingent
upon the length of time that passes before the bridge loan is
repaid, 224 shares on August 11, 2008, 340 additional
shares on October 11, 2008 and 574 additional shares on
December 11, 2008. |
F-58
References herein to we, us or
our refer to Prospect Capital Corporation and its
subsidiary unless the context specifically requires otherwise.
We were formerly known as Prospect Energy Corporation, a
Maryland corporation. We were organized on April 13, 2004
and were funded in an initial public offering (IPO),
completed on July 27, 2004. We are a closed-end investment
company that has filed an election to be treated as a Business
Development Company (BDC), under the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). As a BDC, we
have qualified and have elected to be treated as a regulated
investment company (RIC), under Subchapter M of the
Internal Revenue Code. We invest primarily in senior and
subordinated debt and equity of companies in need of capital for
acquisitions, divestitures, growth, development, project
financings, recapitalizations, and other purposes.
On May 15, 2007, we formed a wholly-owned subsidiary,
Prospect Capital Funding, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company, for the purpose of holding certain of our loan
investments in the portfolio which are used as collateral for
our credit facility.
|
|
Note 2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
The following are significant accounting policies consistently
applied by us:
Basis
of Presentation
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAP) and pursuant to the
requirements for reporting on
Form 10-K
and
Regulation S-X.
The financial results of our portfolio investments are not
consolidated in the financial statements.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of GAAP financial statements requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements
and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the
reported period. Changes in the economic environment, financial
markets, creditworthiness of our portfolio companies and any
other parameters used in determining these estimates could cause
actual results to differ, and these differences could be
material.
Basis
of Consolidation
Under the 1940 Act rules, the regulations pursuant to
Article 6 of
Regulation S-X
and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies, we are
precluded from consolidating any entity other than another
investment company or an operating company which provides
substantially all of its services and benefits to us. Our
financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of
Prospect Capital Funding, LLC, our only wholly-owned,
closely-managed subsidiary that is also an investment company.
All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated
in consolidation.
Investment
Classification
We are a non-diversified company within the meaning of the 1940
Act. We classify our investments by level of control. As defined
in the 1940 Act, control investments are those where there is
the ability or power to exercise a controlling influence over
the management or policies of a company. Control is generally
deemed to exist when a company or individual possesses or has
the right to acquire within 60 days or less, a beneficial
ownership of 25% or more of the voting securities of an investee
company. Affiliated investments and affiliated companies are
defined by a lesser degree of influence and are deemed to exist
through the possession outright or via the right to acquire
within 60 days or less, beneficial ownership of 5% or more
of the outstanding voting securities of another person.
F-59
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
Investments are recognized when we assume an obligation to
acquire a financial instrument and assume the risks for gains or
losses related to that instrument. Investments are derecognized
when we assume an obligation to sell a financial instrument and
forego the risks for gains or losses related to that instrument.
Specifically, we record all security transactions on a trade
date basis. Investments in other, non-security financial
instruments are recorded on the basis of subscription date or
redemption date, as applicable. Amounts for investments
recognized or derecognized but not yet settled are reported as
receivables for investments sold and payables for investments
purchased, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements of
Assets and Liabilities.
Investment
Valuation
Our Board of Directors has established procedures for the
valuation of our investment portfolio. These procedures are
detailed below.
Investments for which market quotations are readily available
are valued at such market quotations.
For most of our investments, market quotations are not
available. With respect to investments for which market
quotations are not readily available or when such market
quotations are deemed not to represent fair value, our Board of
Directors has approved a multi-step valuation process each
quarter, as described below:
(1) Each portfolio company or investment is reviewed by our
investment professionals with the independent valuation firm
engaged by our Board of Directors;
(2) the independent valuation firm conducts independent
appraisals and makes their own independent assessment;
(3) the audit committee of our Board of Directors reviews
and discusses the preliminary valuation of our Investment
Adviser and that of the independent valuation firm; and
(4) the Board of Directors discusses valuations and
determines the fair value of each investment in our portfolio in
good faith based on the input of our Investment Adviser, the
respective independent valuation firm and the audit committee.
Investments are valued utilizing a market approach, an income
approach, or both approaches, as appropriate. The market
approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by
market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or
liabilities (including a business). The income approach uses
valuation techniques to convert future amounts (for example,
cash flows or earnings) to a single present value amount
(discounted) calculated based on an appropriate discount rate.
The measurement is based on the net present value indicated by
current market expectations about those future amounts. In
following these approaches, the types of factors that we may
take into account in fair value pricing our investments include,
as relevant: available current market data, including relevant
and applicable market trading and transaction comparables,
applicable market yields and multiples, security covenants, call
protection provisions, information rights, the nature and
realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio companys
ability to make payments, its earnings and discounted cash
flows, the markets in which the portfolio company does business,
comparisons of financial ratios of peer companies that are
public, M&A comparables, the principal market and
enterprise values, among other factors.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(FAS 157). FAS 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This
statement is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim
periods within those years. We have adopted this statement on a
prospective basis beginning in the quarter ended
September 30, 2008. Adoption of this statement did not have
a material impact on our financial statements for the year ended
June 30, 2009.
F-60
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
FAS 157 classifies the inputs used to measure these fair
values into the following hierarchy:
Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities, accessible by us at the
measurement date.
Level 2: Quoted prices for similar assets
or liabilities in active markets, or quoted prices for identical
or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active,
or other observable inputs other than quoted prices.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs for the
asset or liability.
In all cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which
the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been
determined based on the lowest level of input that is
significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the
significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement
in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific
to each investment. The changes to GAAP from the application of
FAS 157 relate to the definition of fair value, framework
for measuring fair value, and the expanded disclosures about
fair value measurements. FAS 157 applies to fair value
measurements already required or permitted by other standards.
In accordance with FAS 157, the fair value of our
investments is defined as the price that we would receive upon
selling an investment in an orderly transaction to an
independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market
in which that investment is transacted.
In April 2009, FASB issued Staff Position
No. 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased
and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly
(FSP
FAS 157-4).
FSP
FAS 157-4
provides further clarification for the application of
FAS 157 in markets that are not active and provides
additional guidance for determining when the volume of trading
level of activity for an asset or liability has significantly
decreased and for identifying circumstances that indicate a
transaction is not orderly. FSP
FAS 157-4
is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP
FAS 157-4
for the year ended June 30, 2009, did not have any effect
on our net asset value, financial position or results of
operations as there was no change to the fair value measurement
principles set forth in FAS 157.
Valuation
of Other Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities
In February 2007, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities including
an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115
(FAS 159). FAS 159 permits an entity to
elect fair value as the initial and subsequent measurement
attribute for many of assets and liabilities for which the fair
value option has been elected and similar assets and liabilities
measured using another measurement attribute. This statement is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods
within those years. We have adopted this statement on
July 1, 2008 and have elected not to value some assets and
liabilities at fair value as would be permitted by FAS 159.
Revenue
Recognition
Realized gains or losses on the sale of investments are
calculated using the specific identification method.
Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and
accretion of discount, is recorded on an accrual basis.
Origination, closing
and/or
commitment fees associated with investments in portfolio
companies are accreted into interest income over the respective
terms of the applicable loans. Upon the prepayment of a loan or
debt security, any prepayment penalties and unamortized loan
origination, closing and commitment fees are recorded as
interest income.
Loans are placed on non-accrual status when principal or
interest payments are past due 90 days or more or when
there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be
collected. Unpaid accrued interest is generally reversed when a
loan is placed on non-accrual status. Interest payments received
on non-accrual loans may be
F-61
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
recognized as income or applied to principal depending upon
managements judgment. Non-accrual loans are restored to
accrual status when past due principal and interest is paid and
in managements judgment, are likely to remain current.
Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.
Structuring fees and similar fees are recognized as income as
earned, usually when paid. Structuring fees, excess deal
deposits, net profits interests and overriding royalty interests
are included in other income.
Federal
and State Income Taxes
We have elected to be treated as a regulated investment company
and intend to continue to comply with the requirements of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code), applicable
to regulated investment companies. We are required to distribute
at least 90% of our investment company taxable income and intend
to distribute (or retain through a deemed distribution) all of
our investment company taxable income and net capital gain to
stockholders; therefore, we have made no provision for income
taxes. The character of income and gains that we will distribute
is determined in accordance with income tax regulations that may
differ from GAAP. Book and tax basis differences relating to
stockholder dividends and distributions and other permanent book
and tax differences are reclassified to paid-in capital.
If we do not distribute (or are not deemed to have distributed)
at least 98% of our annual taxable income in the calendar year
earned, we will generally be required to pay an excise tax equal
to 4% of the amount by which 98% of our annual taxable income
exceeds the distributions from such taxable income for the year.
To the extent that we determine that our estimated current year
annual taxable income will be in excess of estimated current
year dividend distributions from such taxable income, we accrue
excise taxes, if any, on estimated excess taxable income as
taxable income is earned using an annual effective excise tax
rate. The annual effective excise tax rate is determined by
dividing the estimated annual excise tax by the estimated annual
taxable income. During the quarter ended December 31, 2008,
we elected to retain a portion of our annual taxable income and
paid $533 for the excise tax with the filing of the return in
March 2009.
We adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48).
FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions
should be recognized, measured, presented, and disclosed in the
financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax
positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of
preparing our tax returns to determine whether the tax positions
are more-likely-than-not of being sustained by the
applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the
more-likely-than-not threshold are recorded as a tax benefit or
expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 was applied
to all open tax years as of July 1, 2007. The adoption of
FIN 48 did not have an effect on our net asset value,
financial condition or results of operations as there was no
liability for unrecognized tax benefits and no change to our
beginning net asset value. As of June 30, 2009 and for the
twelve months then ended, we did not have a liability for any
unrecognized tax benefits. Managements determinations
regarding FIN 48 may be subject to review and adjustment at
a later date based upon factors including, but not limited to,
an on-going analysis of tax laws, regulations and
interpretations thereof.
Dividends
and Distributions
Dividends and distributions to common stockholders are recorded
on the ex-dividend date. The amount, if any, to be paid as a
dividend is approved by our Board of Directors each quarter and
is generally based upon our managements estimate of our
earnings for the quarter. Net realized capital gains, if any,
are distributed at least annually.
Financing
Costs
We record origination expenses related to our credit facility as
deferred financing costs. These expenses are deferred and
amortized as part of interest expense using a method that
appropriates the effective interest method.
F-62
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
We record registration expenses related to shelf filings as
prepaid assets. These expenses consist principally of Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) registration, legal
and accounting fees incurred through June 30, 2009 that are
related to the shelf filings that will be charged to capital
upon the receipt of the capital or charged to expense if not
completed.
Guarantees
and Indemnification Agreements
We follow FASB Interpretation Number 45, Guarantors
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others
(FIN 45). FIN 45 elaborates on the
disclosure requirements of a guarantor in its interim and annual
financial statements about its obligations under certain
guarantees that it has issued. It also requires a guarantor to
recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, for those guarantees
that are covered by FIN 45, the fair value of the
obligation undertaken in issuing certain guarantees. FIN 45
did not have a material effect on the financial statements.
Refer to Note 3, Note 7 and Note 10 for further
discussion of guarantees and indemnification agreements.
Per
Share Information
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common
share are calculated using the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding for the period presented. Diluted net
increase in net assets resulting from operations per share are
not presented as there are no potentially dilutive securities
outstanding.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made in the presentation of
prior consolidated financial statements to conform to the
presentation as of and for the twelve months ended June 30,
2009.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 141(R) , Business
Combinations (FAS 141(R)).
FAS 141(R) establishes accounting principles and disclosure
requirements for all transactions in which a company obtains
control over another business. The standard is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Our
management does not believe that the adoption of FAS 141(R)
will have a material impact on our financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 133 (FAS 161).
FAS 161 is intended to improve financial reporting for
derivative instruments by requiring enhanced disclosure that
enables investors to understand how and why the entity uses
derivatives, how derivatives are accounted for, and how
derivatives affect an entitys results of operations,
financial position, and cash flows. FAS 161 becomes
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2008; therefore, is applicable for our fiscal year beginning
July 1, 2009. Our management does not believe that the
adoption of FAS 161 will have a material impact on our
financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles (FAS 162).
FAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and
the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the
preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities
that are presented in conformity with GAAP. This statement is
effective 60 days following the SECs approval of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU
Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity
With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Our management
does not believe that the adoption of FAS 162 will have a
material impact on our financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 165, Subsequent Events
(FAS 165). FAS 165 establishes general
standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur
after the
F-63
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or
are available to be issued. The standard, which includes a new
required disclosure of the date through which an entity has
evaluated subsequent events, is effective for interim or annual
periods ending after June 15, 2009. We evaluated all events
or transactions that occurred after June 30, 2009 up
through September 11, 2009, the date we issued these
financial statements. Management has also evaluated all events
or transactions from September 12, 2009 through
November 6, 2009, and has updated Note 12 for any
additional transactions which have occurred, which are
unaudited. During these periods, we did not have any material
recognizable subsequent events other than those disclosed in
Note 12.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles a replacement of FASB Statement
No. 162 (FAS 168). FAS 168
provides for the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the
Codification) to become the single official source
of authoritative, nongovernmental GAAP. The Codification did not
change GAAP but reorganizes the literature. FAS 168 is
effective for interim and annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009. Our management does not believe that
the adoption of FAS 168 will have a material impact on our
financial statements.
|
|
Note 3.
|
Portfolio
Investments
|
At June 30, 2009, we had invested in 30 long-term portfolio
investments, which had an amortized cost of $531,424 and a fair
value of $547,168 and at June 30, 2008, we had invested in
29 long-term portfolio investments (including a net profits
interest in Charlevoix Energy Trading LLC), which had an
amortized cost of $496,805 and a fair value of $497,530.
As of June 30, 2009, we own controlling interests in Ajax
Rolled Ring & Machine (Ajax), C&J
Cladding, LLC (C&J), Change Clean Energy
Holdings, Inc. (CCEHI), Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(GSHI), Integrated Contract Services, Inc.
(ICS), Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc. (Iron
Horse), NRG Manufacturing, Inc. (NRG), R-V
Industries, Inc. (R-V), and Yatesville Coal
Holdings, Inc. (Yatesville). We also own an
affiliated interest in Appalachian Energy Holdings, LLC
(AEH) and Biotronic NeuroNetwork
(Biotronic).
The fair values of our portfolio investments as of June 30,
2009 disaggregated into the three levels of the FAS 157
valuation hierarchy are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Investments at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
206,332
|
|
|
$
|
206,332
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,254
|
|
|
|
32,254
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,582
|
|
|
|
308,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
547,168
|
|
|
|
547,168
|
|
Investments in money market funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets reported at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
98,735
|
|
|
$
|
547,168
|
|
|
$
|
645,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-64
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
The aggregate values of Level 3 portfolio investments
changed during the twelve months ended June 30, 2009 as
follows:
Change in Portfolio Valuations using Significant Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
497,530
|
|
Total gains (losses) reported in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
Included in net investment income
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income accretion of original issue discount
on investments
|
|
|
2,399
|
|
Included in realized (loss) gain on investments
|
|
|
(39,078
|
)
|
Included in net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
on investments
|
|
|
15,019
|
|
Payments for purchases of investments,
payment-in-kind
interest, and net profits interests
|
|
|
98,305
|
|
Proceeds from sale of investments and collection of investment
principal
|
|
|
(27,007
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
547,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of net unrealized gain included in the results of
operations attributable to Level 3 assets still held at
June 30, 2009 and reported within the caption Net change in
unrealized appreciation/depreciation in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations:
|
|
$
|
19,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009, we determined that one of our
investments, Change Clean Energy Inc. (CCEI), was
other than temporarily impaired and recorded a realized loss
representing the amount by which the amortized cost exceeded the
fair value. At June 30, 2009, five loan investments were on
non-accrual status: AEH, Conquest Cherokee, LLC
(Conquest), ICS, Wind River Resources Corp. and Wind
River II Corp. (Wind River), and Yatesville. At
June 30, 2008, the loans extended to ICS were on
non-accrual status. The loan principal of these loans amounted
to $92,513 and $14,803 as of June 30, 2009, and
June 30, 2008, respectively. The fair values of these
investments represent approximately 7.3% and 0.9% of our net
assets as of June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008,
respectively. For the years ended June 30, 2009,
June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, the income foregone
as a result of not accruing interest on non-accrual debt
investments amounted to $18,746, $3,449 and $1,270, respectively.
GSHI has indemnified us against any legal action arising from
its investment in Gas Solutions, LP. We have incurred
approximately $2,093 from the inception of the investment in
GSHI through June 30, 2009 for fees associated with a legal
action, and GSHI has reimbursed us for the entire amount. The
$2,093 reimbursement is reflected as dividend income: control
investments in the Consolidated Statements of Operations with
$179, $118 and $178 reflected for the year ended June 30,
2009, June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, respectively,
and the remainder reflected in prior periods. Additionally,
certain other expenses incurred by us which are attributable to
GSHI have been reimbursed by GSHI and are reflected as dividend
income: control investments in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. For the years ended June 30, 2009,
June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, such reimbursements
totaled as $4,422, $4,589 and $2,578, respectively.
The original cost basis of debt placements and equity securities
acquired, including follow-on investments for existing portfolio
companies, totaled $98,305, $311,947 and $167,255 during the
year ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and
June 30, 2007, respectively. Debt repayments and sales of
equity securities with a cost basis of approximately $66,084,
$143,434 and $36,458 were received during the year ended
June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007,
respectively.
F-65
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
|
|
Note 4.
|
Other
Investment Income
|
Other investment income consists of structuring fees, overriding
royalty interests, prepayment penalty on net profits interests,
settlement of net profits interests, deal deposits,
administrative agent fee, and other miscellaneous and sundry
cash receipts. Income from such sources was $14,762, $8,336 and
$4,444 for the years ended June 30, 2009, June 30,
2008 and June 30, 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended June 30,
|
|
Income Source
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Structuring fees
|
|
$
|
1,274
|
|
|
$
|
4,751
|
|
|
$
|
2,574
|
|
Overriding royalty interests
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
1,819
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
Prepayment penalty on net profits interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,659
|
|
|
|
986
|
|
Settlement of net profits interests
|
|
|
12,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deal deposit
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
Administrative agent fee
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Investment Income
|
|
$
|
14,762
|
|
|
$
|
8,336
|
|
|
$
|
4,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5.
|
Equity
Offerings and Related Expenses
|
During the year ended June 30, 2009, we issued
12,942,500 shares of our common stock through public
offerings, a registered direct offering, and through the
exercise of over-allotment options on the part of the
underwriters. Offering expenses were charged against paid-in
capital in excess of par. All underwriting fees and offering
expenses were borne by us. The proceeds raised, the related
underwriting fees, the offering expenses, and the prices at
which common stocks were issued since inception are detailed in
the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Proceeds
|
|
|
Underwriting
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
Issuances of Common Stock
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Raised
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
May 26, 2009 over-allotment
|
|
|
1,012,500
|
|
|
$
|
8,353
|
|
|
$
|
418
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.250
|
|
May 26, 2009
|
|
|
6,750,000
|
|
|
|
55,687
|
|
|
|
2,784
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
8.250
|
|
April 27, 2009 over-allotment
|
|
|
480,000
|
|
|
|
3,720
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.750
|
|
April 27, 2009
|
|
|
3,200,000
|
|
|
|
24,800
|
|
|
|
1,177
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
7.750
|
|
March 19, 2009
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
8.200
|
|
June 2, 2008
|
|
|
3,250,000
|
|
|
|
48,425
|
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
14.900
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,150,000
|
|
|
|
17,768
|
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
15.450
|
|
March 28, 2008
|
|
|
1,300,000
|
|
|
|
19,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
15.220
|
|
November 13, 2007 over-allotment
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
3,268
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.340
|
|
October 17, 2007
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
|
57,190
|
|
|
|
2,860
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
16.340
|
|
January 11, 2007 over-allotment
|
|
|
810,000
|
|
|
|
14,026
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.315
|
(1)
|
December 13, 2006
|
|
|
6,000,000
|
|
|
|
106,200
|
|
|
|
5,100
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
17.700
|
|
August 28, 2006 over-allotment
|
|
|
745,650
|
|
|
|
11,408
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.300
|
|
August 10, 2006
|
|
|
4,971,000
|
|
|
|
76,056
|
|
|
|
3,778
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
15.300
|
|
August 27, 2004 over-allotment
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
15.000
|
|
July 27, 2004
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
7,350
|
|
|
|
1,385
|
|
|
|
15.000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We declared a dividend of $0.385 per share between offering and
over allotment dates. |
F-66
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
Our shareholders equity accounts at June 30, 2009 and
June 30, 2008 reflect cumulative shares issued as of those
respective dates. Our common stock has been issued through
public offerings, a registered direct offering, the exercise of
over-allotment options on the part of the underwriters and our
dividend reinvestment plan. When our common stock is issued, the
related offering expenses have been charged against paid-in
capital in excess of par. All underwriting fees and offering
expenses were borne by us.
On October 9, 2008, our Board of Directors approved a share
repurchase plan under which we may repurchase up to $20,000 of
our common stock at prices below our net asset value as reported
in our financial statements published for the year ended
June 30, 2008. We have not made any purchases of our common
stock during the period from October 9, 2008 to
June 30, 2009 pursuant to this plan.
|
|
Note 6.
|
Net
Increase in Net Assets per Common Share
|
The following information sets forth the computation of net
increase in net assets resulting from operations per common
share for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
35,104
|
|
|
$
|
27,591
|
|
|
$
|
16,728
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
31,559,905
|
|
|
|
23,626,642
|
|
|
|
15,724,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common
share
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7.
|
Related
Party Agreements and Transactions
|
Investment
Advisory Agreement
We have entered into an investment advisory and management
agreement with Prospect Capital Management (the Investment
Advisory Agreement) under which the Investment Adviser,
subject to the overall supervision of our Board of Directors,
manages the
day-to-day
operations of, and provides investment advisory services to, us.
Under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, our
Investment Adviser: (i) determines the composition of our
portfolio, the nature and timing of the changes to our portfolio
and the manner of implementing such changes,
(ii) identifies, evaluates and negotiates the structure of
the investments we make (including performing due diligence on
our prospective portfolio companies); and (iii) closes and
monitors investments we make.
Prospect Capital Managements services under the Investment
Advisory Agreement are not exclusive, and it is free to furnish
similar services to other entities so long as its services to us
are not impaired. For providing these services the Investment
Adviser receives a fee from us, consisting of two components: a
base management fee and an incentive fee. The base management
fee is calculated at an annual rate of 2.00% on our gross assets
(including amounts borrowed). For services currently rendered
under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the base management fee
is payable quarterly in arrears. The base management fee is
calculated based on the average value of our gross assets at the
end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters and
appropriately adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases
during the current calendar quarter.
The Investment Adviser had previously voluntarily agreed to
waive 0.5% of the base management fee if in the future the
average amount of our gross assets for each of the two most
recently completed calendar quarters at that time, appropriately
adjusted for any share issuances, repurchases or other
transactions during such quarters, exceeds $750,000, for that
portion of the average amount of our gross assets that exceeds
$750,000. The voluntary agreement by the Investment Adviser for
such waiver for each fiscal quarter after December 31, 2007
has been terminated by the Investment Adviser.
F-67
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
The total base management fees earned by and paid to Prospect
Capital Management for the years ended June 30, 2009,
June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007 were $11,915, $8,921
and $5,445, respectively.
The incentive fee has two parts. The first part, the income
incentive fee, is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears
based on our pre-incentive fee net investment income for the
immediately preceding calendar quarter. For this purpose,
pre-incentive fee net investment income means interest income,
dividend income and any other income (including any other fees
(other than fees for providing managerial assistance), such as
commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting
fees and other fees that we receive from portfolio companies)
accrued during the calendar quarter, minus our operating
expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee,
expenses payable under the Administration Agreement described
below, and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued
and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive
fee). Pre-incentive fee net investment income includes, in the
case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as
original issue discount, debt instruments with payment in kind
interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that we
have not yet received in cash. Pre-incentive fee net investment
income does not include any realized capital gains, realized
capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or
depreciation. Pre-incentive fee net investment income, expressed
as a rate of return on the value of our net assets at the end of
the immediately preceding calendar quarter, is compared to a
hurdle rate of 1.75% per quarter (7.00% annualized).
Previously, our Investment Adviser had voluntarily agreed that
for each fiscal quarter from January 1, 2005 to
March 31, 2007, the quarterly hurdle rate was to be equal
to the greater of (a) 1.75% and (b) a percentage equal
to the sum of 25.0% of the daily average of the quoted
treasury rate for each month in the immediately preceding
two quarters plus 0.50%. Quoted treasury rate means
the yield to maturity (calculated on a semi-annual bond
equivalent basis) at the time of computation for Five Year
U.S. Treasury notes with a constant maturity (as compiled
and published in the most recent Federal Reserve Statistical
Release H). These calculations were to be appropriately prorated
for any period of less than three months and adjusted for any
share issuances or repurchases during the current quarter. The
voluntary agreement by the Investment Adviser that the hurdle
rate be fluctuating for each fiscal quarter after
January 1, 2005 (as discussed above) was terminated by the
Investment Adviser as of the June 30, 2007 quarter. The
investment adviser had also voluntarily agreed that, in the
event it is paid an incentive fee at a time when our common
stock is trading at a price below $15 per share for the
immediately preceding 30 days (as adjusted for stock
splits, recapitalizations and other transactions), it will cause
the amount of such incentive fee payment to be held in an escrow
account by an independent third party, subject to applicable
regulations. The Investment Adviser had further agreed that this
amount may not be drawn upon by the Investment Adviser or any
affiliate or any other third party until such time as the price
of our common stock achieves an average 30 day closing
price of at least $15 per share. The Investment Adviser also had
voluntarily agreed to cause 30% of any incentive fee that it is
paid and that is not otherwise held in escrow to be invested in
shares of our common stock through an independent trustee. Any
sales of such stock were to comply with any applicable six month
holding period under Section 16(b) of the Securities Act
and all other restrictions contained in any law or regulation,
to the fullest extent applicable to any such sale. These two
voluntary agreements by the Investment Adviser have been
terminated by the Investment Adviser for all incentive fees
after December 31, 2007.
The net investment income used to calculate this part of the
incentive fee is also included in the amount of the gross assets
used to calculate the 2.00% base management fee. We pay the
Investment Adviser an income incentive fee with respect to our
pre-incentive fee net investment income in each calendar quarter
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
no incentive fee in any calendar quarter in which our
pre-incentive fee net investment income does not exceed the
hurdle rate;
|
F-68
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
100.00% of our pre-incentive fee net investment income with
respect to that portion of such pre-incentive fee net investment
income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than
125.00% of the quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar quarter
(8.75% annualized assuming a 7.00% annualized hurdle
rate); and
|
|
|
|
20.00% of the amount of our pre-incentive fee net investment
income, if any, that exceeds 125.00% of the quarterly hurdle
rate in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized assuming a 7.00%
annualized hurdle rate).
|
These calculations are appropriately prorated for any period of
less than three months and adjusted for any share issuances or
repurchases during the current quarter.
The second part of the incentive fee, the capital gains
incentive fee, is determined and payable in arrears as of the
end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment
Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date), and equals
20.00% of our realized capital gains for the calendar year, if
any, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized
capital depreciation at the end of such year. In determining the
capital gains incentive fee payable to the Investment Adviser,
we calculate the aggregate realized capital gains, aggregate
realized capital losses and aggregate unrealized capital
depreciation, as applicable, with respect to each investment
that has been in its portfolio. For the purpose of this
calculation, an investment is defined as the total
of all rights and claims which maybe asserted against a
portfolio company arising from our participation in the debt,
equity, and other financial instruments issued by that company.
Aggregate realized capital gains, if any, equals the sum of the
differences between the aggregate net sales price of each
investment and the aggregate cost basis of such investment when
sold or otherwise disposed. Aggregate realized capital losses
equal the sum of the amounts by which the aggregate net sales
price of each investment is less than the aggregate cost basis
of such investment when sold or otherwise disposed. Aggregate
unrealized capital depreciation equals the sum of the
differences, if negative, between the aggregate valuation of
each investment and the aggregate cost basis of such investment
as of the applicable calendar year-end . At the end of the
applicable calendar year, the amount of capital gains that
serves as the basis for our calculation of the capital gains
incentive fee involves netting aggregate realized capital gains
against aggregate realized capital losses on a since-inception
basis and then reducing this amount by the aggregate unrealized
capital depreciation. If this number is positive, then the
capital gains incentive fee payable is equal to 20.00% of such
amount, less the aggregate amount of any capital gains incentive
fees paid since inception.
Income incentive fees totaling $14,790, $11,278 and $5,781 were
earned for the years ended June 30, 2009, June 30,
2008 and June 30, 2007, respectively. No capital gains
incentive fees were earned for years ended June 30, 2009,
June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007.
Administration
Agreement
We have also entered into an Administration Agreement with
Prospect Administration, LLC (Prospect
Administration) under which Prospect Administration, among
other things, provides (or arranges for the provision of)
administrative services and facilities for us. For providing
these services, we reimburse Prospect Administration for our
allocable portion of overhead incurred by Prospect
Administration in performing its obligations under the
Administration Agreement, including rent and our allocable
portion of the costs of our chief compliance officer and chief
financial officer and their respective staffs. For the years
ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the reimbursement was
approximately $2,856, $2,139 and $532, respectively. Under this
agreement, Prospect Administration furnishes us with office
facilities, equipment and clerical, bookkeeping and record
keeping services at such facilities. Prospect Administration
also performs, or oversees the performance of, our required
administrative services, which include, among other things,
being responsible for the financial records that we are required
to maintain and preparing reports to our stockholders and
reports filed with the SEC. In addition, Prospect Administration
assists us in determining and publishing our net asset value,
overseeing the preparation and filing of our tax returns and the
printing and dissemination of reports to our stockholders, and
generally oversees the
F-69
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
payment of our expenses and the performance of administrative
and professional services rendered to us by others. Under the
Administration Agreement, Prospect Administration also provides
on our behalf managerial assistance to those portfolio companies
to which we are required to provide such assistance. The
Administration Agreement may be terminated by either party
without penalty upon 60 days written notice to the
other party. Prospect Administration is a wholly owned
subsidiary of our Investment Adviser.
The Administration Agreement provides that, absent willful
misfeasance, bad faith or negligence in the performance of its
duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties and
obligations, Prospect Administration and its officers, managers,
partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and
any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to
indemnification from us for any damages, liabilities, costs and
expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees and amounts
reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of
Prospect Administrations services under the Administration
Agreement or otherwise as administrator for us.
Prospect Administration previously engaged Vastardis
Fund Services LLC (Vastardis) to serve as our
sub-administrator
to perform certain services required of Prospect Administration.
On April 30, 2009 we gave a
60-day
notice to Vastardis of termination of our agreement to provide
sub-administration
services effective June 30, 2009. We entered into a new
consulting services agreement for the period from July 1,
2009 until the filing of our
Form 10-K
for the year ended June 30, 2009. We paid Vastardis a total
of $30 for services rendered in conjunction with preparation of
Form 10-K
under the new agreement. All administration services were
assumed by Prospect Administration effective September 14,
2009.
Managerial
Assistance
As a business development company, we offer, and must provide
upon request, managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio
companies. This assistance could involve, among other things,
monitoring the operations of our portfolio companies,
participating in board and management meetings, consulting with
and advising officers of portfolio companies and providing other
organizational and financial guidance. We billed $846, $1,027,
and $505 of managerial assistance fees for the years ended
June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008, and June 30, 2007,
respectively, of which $60 and $380 remains on the consolidated
statement of assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2009,
and June 30, 2008, respectively. These fees are paid to the
Administrator so we simultaneously accrue a payable to the
Administrator for the same amounts, which remain on the
consolidated statements of assets and liabilities.
F-70
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
|
|
Note 8.
|
Financial
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Per Share Data(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
14.55
|
|
|
$
|
15.04
|
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
Costs related to the initial public offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.21
|
)
|
Costs related to the secondary public offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
1.87
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
Realized (loss) gain
|
|
|
(1.24
|
)
|
|
|
(0.69
|
)
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
(0.52
|
)
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in net assets as a result of public
offering
|
|
|
(2.11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.95
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
(1.15
|
)
|
|
|
(1.59
|
)
|
|
|
(1.54
|
)
|
|
|
(1.12
|
)
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at end of period
|
|
$
|
12.40
|
|
|
$
|
14.55
|
|
|
$
|
15.04
|
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share market value at end of period
|
|
$
|
9.20
|
|
|
$
|
13.18
|
|
|
$
|
17.47
|
|
|
$
|
16.99
|
|
|
$
|
12.60
|
|
Total return based on market value(2)
|
|
|
(22.04
|
)%
|
|
|
(15.90
|
)%
|
|
|
12.65
|
%
|
|
|
44.90
|
%
|
|
|
(13.46
|
)%
|
Total return based on net asset value(2)
|
|
|
(4.81
|
)%
|
|
|
7.84
|
%
|
|
|
7.62
|
%
|
|
|
12.76
|
%
|
|
|
7.40
|
%
|
Shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
42,943,084
|
|
|
|
29,520,379
|
|
|
|
19,949,065
|
|
|
|
7,069,873
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
Average weighted shares outstanding for period
|
|
|
31,559,905
|
|
|
|
23,626,642
|
|
|
|
15,724,095
|
|
|
|
7,056,846
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
Ratio/Supplemental Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets at end of period (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
532,596
|
|
|
$
|
429,623
|
|
|
$
|
300,048
|
|
|
$
|
108,270
|
|
|
$
|
102,967
|
|
Annualized ratio of operating expenses to average net assets
|
|
|
9.03
|
%
|
|
|
9.62
|
%
|
|
|
7.36
|
%
|
|
|
8.19
|
%
|
|
|
5.52
|
%
|
Annualized ratio of net investment income to average net assets
|
|
|
13.14
|
%
|
|
|
12.66
|
%
|
|
|
9.71
|
%
|
|
|
7.90
|
%
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Financial highlights are based on weighted average shares. |
|
(2) |
|
Total return based on market value is based on the change in
market price per share between the opening and ending market
prices per share in each period and assumes that dividends are
reinvested in accordance with our dividend reinvestment plan.
Total return based on net asset value is based upon the change
in net asset value per share between the opening and ending net
asset values per share in each period and assumes that dividends
are reinvested in accordance with our dividend reinvestment plan. |
F-71
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
From time to time, we may become involved in various
investigations, claims and legal proceedings that arise in the
ordinary course of our business. These matters may relate to
intellectual property, employment, tax, regulation, contract or
other matters. The resolution of these matters as they arise
will be subject to various uncertainties and, even if such
claims are without merit, could result in the expenditure of
significant financial and managerial resources.
On December 6, 2004, Dallas Gas Partners, L.P.
(DGP) served us with a complaint filed
November 30, 2004 in the U.S. District for the
Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division. DGP alleges that
DGP was defrauded and that we breached our fiduciary duty to DGP
and tortiously interfered with DGPs contract to purchase
Gas Solutions, Ltd. (a subsidiary of our portfolio company,
GSHI) in connection with our alleged agreement in September 2004
to loan DGP funds with which DGP intended to buy Gas Solutions,
Ltd. for approximately $26,000. The complaint sought relief not
limited to $100,000. On November 30, 2005,
U.S. Magistrate Judge John R. Froeschner of the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Galveston Division, issued a recommendation that the court grant
our Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing all claims by DGP. On
February 21, 2006, U.S. District Judge Samuel Kent of
the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Galveston Division issued an order granting our Motion for
Summary Judgment dismissing all claims by DGP, against us. On
May 16, 2007, the Court also granted us summary judgment on
DGPs liability to us on our counterclaim for DGPs
breach of a release and covenant not to sue. On January 4,
2008, the Court, Judge Melinda Harmon presiding, granted our
motion to dismiss all DGPs claims asserted against certain
of our officers and affiliates. On August 20, 2008, Judge
Harmon entered a Final Judgment dismissing all of DGPs
claims. DGP appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Fifth Circuit, which affirmed the Final Judgment on
June 24, 2009. DGP has moved for rehearing. Our damage
claims against DGP remain pending.
In May 2006, based in part on unfavorable due diligence and the
absence of investment committee approval, we declined to extend
a loan for $10,000 to a potential borrower
(plaintiff). Plaintiff was subsequently sued by its
own attorney in a local Texas court for plaintiffs failure
to pay fees owed to its attorney. In December 2006, plaintiff
filed a cross-action against us and certain affiliates (the
defendants) in the same local Texas court, alleging,
among other things, tortuous interference with contract and
fraud. We petitioned the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York (the District Court)
to compel arbitration and to enjoin the Texas action. In
February 2007, our motions were granted. Plaintiff appealed that
decision. On July 24, 2008, the Second Circuit Court of
Appeals affirmed the judgment of the District Court. The
arbitration commenced in July 2007 and concluded in late
November 2007. Post-hearing briefings were completed in February
2008. On April 14, 2008, the arbitrator rendered an award
in our favor, rejecting all of plaintiffs claims. On
April 18, 2008, we filed a petition before the District
Court to confirm the award. On October 8, 2008, the
District Court granted the Companys petition to confirm
the award, confirmed the awards and subsequently entered
judgment thereon in favor of the Company in the amount of
$2,288. After filing a defective notice of appeal to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on
November 5, 2008, plaintiffs counsel resubmitted a
new notice of appeal on January 9, 2009. The plaintiff
subsequently requested that the Company agree to stipulate to
the withdrawal of plaintiffs appeal to the Second Circuit.
Such a stipulation was filed with the Second Circuit on or about
April 14, 2009. Based on this stipulation, the Second
Circuit issued a mandate terminating the appeal, which was
transmitted to the District Court on April 23, 2009.
Post-judgment discovery against plaintiff is continuing and we
have filed a motion for sanctions against plaintiffs
counsel which is scheduled for argument on October 5, 2009.
F-72
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
|
|
Note 10.
|
Revolving
Credit Agreements
|
On June 6, 2007, we closed on a $200,000 three-year
revolving credit facility (as amended on December 31,
2007) with Rabobank Nederland (Rabobank) as
administrative agent and sole lead arranger (the Rabobank
Facility). Until November 14, 2008, interest on the
Rabobank Facility was charged at LIBOR plus 175 basis
points; thereafter, under the terms of a commitment letter with
Rabobank to arrange and structure a new rated credit facility,
we agreed to an immediate increase in the current borrowing rate
on the Rabobank Facility to LIBOR plus 250 basis points.
Additionally, Rabobank charged a fee on the unused portion of
the facility. This fee is assessed at the rate of
37.5 basis points per annum of the amount of that unused
portion.
On June 25, 2009, we completed a first closing on an
expanded $250,000 revolving credit facility (the
Syndicated Facility). The new Syndicated Facility,
which had $175,000 total commitments as of June 30, 2009,
includes an accordion feature which allows the Syndicated
Facility to accept up to an aggregate total of $250,000 of
commitments for which we continue to solicit additional
commitments from other lenders for the additional $75,000. The
revolving period extends through June 24, 2010, with an
additional one year amortization period thereafter whereby all
principal, interest and fee payments received in conjunction
with collateral pledged to the Syndicated Facility, less a
monthly servicing fee payable to us, are required to be used to
repay outstanding borrowings under the Syndicated Facility. Any
remaining outstanding borrowings would be due and payable on the
commitment termination date, which is currently June 24,
2011.
The Syndicated Facility contains restrictions pertaining to the
geographic and industry concentrations of funded loans, maximum
size of funded loans, interest rate payment frequency of funded
loans, maturity dates of funded loans and minimum equity
requirements. The Syndicated Facility also contains certain
requirements relating to portfolio performance, including
required minimum portfolio yield and limitations on
delinquencies and charge-offs, violation of which could result
in the early termination of the Syndicated Facility. The
Syndicated Facility also requires the maintenance of a minimum
liquidity requirement. At June 30, 2009, we were in
compliance with the applicable covenants.
Interest on borrowings under the credit facility is one-month
LIBOR plus 400 basis points, subject to a minimum Libor
floor of 200 basis points. Additionally, the banks charge a
fee on the unused portion of the credit facility equal to
100 basis points. As of June 30, 2009, we had $124,800
outstanding under our credit facility. As of June 30, 2009,
$946 was available to us for borrowing under our credit
facility. As we make additional investments which are eligible
to be pledged under the credit facility, we will generate
additional availability to the extent such investments are
eligible to be placed into the borrowing base. At June 30,
2009, the investments used as collateral for the Syndicated
Facility had an aggregate market value of $434,069, which
represents 81.5% of net assets.
In connection with the origination and amendment of the
Syndicated Facility, we incurred approximately $6.3 million
of fees which are being amortized over the term of the facility.
F-73
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
|
|
Note 11.
|
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized and
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains
|
|
|
in Net Assets from
|
|
|
|
Investment Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Share(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Share(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Share(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Share(1)
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
6,432
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
$
|
3,274
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
690
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
3,964
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
8,171
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
4,493
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
(1,553
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
2,940
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
12,069
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
7,015
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
(2,039
|
)
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
4,976
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
14,009
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
8,349
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
(3,501
|
)
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
4,848
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
15,391
|
|
|
|
0.77
|
|
|
|
7,865
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
8,550
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
18,563
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
10,660
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
(14,346
|
)
|
|
|
(0.62
|
)
|
|
|
(3,686
|
)
|
|
|
(0.16
|
)
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
|
|
12,919
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
(14,178
|
)
|
|
|
(0.59
|
)
|
|
|
(1,259
|
)
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
23,448
|
|
|
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
13,669
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
10,317
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
23,986
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
September 30, 2008(2)
|
|
|
35,799
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
23,502
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
(9,504
|
)
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
13,998
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
22,213
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
11,960
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
(5,436
|
)
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
6,524
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
20,669
|
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
11,720
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
3,611
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
15,331
|
|
|
|
0.51
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
21,800
|
|
|
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
11,981
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
(12,730
|
)
|
|
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
|
(749
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Per share amounts are calculated using weighted average shares
during period. |
|
(2) |
|
Additional income for this quarter was driven by other
investment income from the settlement of net profits interests
on IEC Systems LP and Advanced Rig Services LLC. See Note 4. |
|
|
Note 12.
|
Subsequent
Events
|
On July 6, 2009, and July 8, 2009, we paid down
$50,500 and $74,300 of our revolving credit facility,
respectively, reducing our outstanding borrowing to zero.
On July 7, 2009, we closed a public offering of
5,175,000 shares of our common stock (including the
exercise of over-allotment options of our underwriters). The net
proceeds to us were approximately $44,046 after deducting
estimated offering expenses.
On July 20, 2009, we purchased 297,274 shares of our
common stock in connection with the dividend reinvestment plan.
On August 3, 2009, we announced that we had entered into a
definitive agreement to acquire Patriot Capital Funding, Inc.
(NASDAQ: PCAP) (Patriot) for approximately $197,000
comprised of our common stock and cash to repay all Patriot
debt, anticipated to be $110,500. when the acquisition closes.
Our common shares will be exchanged at a ratio of approximately
0.3992 for each Patriot share, or 8,616,467 shares of our
common stock for 21,584,251 Patriot shares, with such exchange
ratio decreased for any tax distributions Patriot may declare
before closing. In return, we will acquire assets with an
amortized cost of approximately $311,000 for approximately
$196,000, based on an estimate of our common stock price of $10
per share and the anticipated debt outstanding at the closing,
the value of either may change prior to the closing. We, in
conjunction with an independent valuation agent, have determined
that the fair value of the assets is approximate to the
anticipated purchase price and do not anticipate recording any
material gain on the consummation of the transaction.
On August 20, 2009, we issued 3,449,686 shares at
$8.50 per share in a private stock offering. The net proceeds to
us were approximately $29,205 after deducting legal and advisory
fees. Concurrent with the sale of these shares,
F-74
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2009
(In thousands, except share and per share
data) (Continued)
we entered into a registration rights agreement in which we
granted the purchasers certain registration rights with respect
to the Shares. Under the terms and conditions of the
registration rights agreement, we will use our reasonable best
efforts to file with the SEC within sixty (60) days a
post-effective amendment to the registration statement on
Form N-2
and will also use our reasonable best efforts to cause such
post-effective amendment to be declared effective by the SEC
within one hundred twenty (120) days. Under the
registration rights agreement, the Corporation may be obligated
to make liquidated damages payments to holders upon certain
events.
On August 31, 2009, C&J repaid the $3,150 loan
receivable to us and we received an additional 5% prepayment
penalty totaling $158. We continue to hold warrants for common
units in this investment.
On September 4, 2009, Peerless Manufacturing Co. repaid the
$20,000 loan receivable to us.
On September 24, 2009, we issued 2,807,111 shares at
$9.00 per share in a private stock offering. The net proceeds to
us were approximately $24,423 after deducting estimated legal
and advisory fees. Concurrent with the sale of these shares, we
entered into a registration rights agreement in which we granted
the purchasers certain registration rights with respect to the
Shares. Under the terms and conditions of the registration
rights agreement, we will use our reasonable best efforts to
file with the SEC within sixty (60) days a post-effective
amendment to the registration statement on
Form N-2
and will also use our reasonable best efforts to cause such
post-effective amendment to be declared effective by the SEC
within one hundred twenty (120) days. Under the
registration rights agreement, the Corporation may be obligated
to make liquidated damages payments to holders upon certain
events.
On September 28, 2009, we announced the declaration of a
cash distribution of $0.4075 per share to holders of record on
October 8, 2009 to be paid on October 19, 2009.
On September 29, 2009, we announced a $20,000 increase in
total commitments on our revolving credit facility, increasing
the facility size from $175,000 to $195,000.
On October 19, 2009, we issued 233,523 shares of our
common stock in connection with the dividend reinvestment plan.
F-75
2,092,022 Shares
Prospect Capital
Corporation
Common Stock
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
March 8, 2010