e8vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 28, 2010
McKesson Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
1-13252
|
|
94-3207296 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation)
|
|
(Commission File Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
McKesson Plaza, One Post Street, San Francisco, California
|
|
94104 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (415) 983-8300
Not Applicable
(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy
the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
|
|
|
o |
|
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
|
|
|
|
Item 5.02 |
|
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of
Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. |
On July 28, 2010, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the 2010 Annual Meeting) of
McKesson Corporation (the Company), stockholders approved an amendment to the Companys 2005
Stock Plan (the Stock Plan) and 2005 Management Incentive Plan (the MIP) for the purpose of
adding seven new performance measures. The amendment to add seven new performance measures to the
Companys Stock Plan and MIP had been previously approved by the Board of Directors at its April
21, 2010 meeting, subject to stockholder approval. The added performance measures approved by the
Companys stockholders at the 2010 Annual Meeting are as follows: average invested capital; credit
rating; gross margin; improvement in workforce diversity; operating expenses; operating expenses as
a percentage of revenue; and succession plan development and implementation. A summary of the
material terms of the Companys Stock Plan and MIP is set forth in the Companys definitive proxy
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 21, 2010 (the Definitive Proxy
Statement), which is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
Item 5.07 |
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
The following six items were voted upon at the Companys 2010 Annual Meeting, and the
stockholder votes on each such matter as certified by the Inspector of Election, are briefly
described below.
Item 1. The Board of Directors nominees for directors as listed in the Definitive
Proxy Statement were each elected to serve a one-year term. The votes were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director Nominee |
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Votes Abstained |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
Andy D. Bryant |
|
|
205,018,244 |
|
|
|
819,904 |
|
|
|
3,641,525 |
|
|
|
17,630,582 |
|
Wayne A. Budd |
|
|
204,958,917 |
|
|
|
916,597 |
|
|
|
3,604,159 |
|
|
|
17,630,582 |
|
John H. Hammergren |
|
|
199,399,785 |
|
|
|
6,562,815 |
|
|
|
3,517,073 |
|
|
|
17,630,582 |
|
Alton F. Irby III |
|
|
108,171,100 |
|
|
|
97,664,722 |
|
|
|
3,643,851 |
|
|
|
17,630,582 |
|
M. Christine Jacobs |
|
|
118,126,522 |
|
|
|
87,782,439 |
|
|
|
3,570,712 |
|
|
|
17,630,582 |
|
Marie L. Knowles |
|
|
205,016,534 |
|
|
|
879,572 |
|
|
|
3,583,567 |
|
|
|
17,630,582 |
|
David M. Lawrence M.D. |
|
|
118,237,531 |
|
|
|
87,684,000 |
|
|
|
3,558,142 |
|
|
|
17,630,582 |
|
Edward A. Mueller |
|
|
116,485,117 |
|
|
|
89,294,708 |
|
|
|
3,699,848 |
|
|
|
17,630,582 |
|
Jane E. Shaw, Ph.D. |
|
|
201,928,428 |
|
|
|
3,959,262 |
|
|
|
3,591,983 |
|
|
|
17,630,582 |
|
Item 2. The proposal to reapprove the performance measures available for
performance-based awards under the Companys amended and restated Stock Plan in order to preserve
the deductibility of such awards under the Federal tax rules was approved, having received the
following votes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Votes Abstained |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
208,551,310
|
|
14,333,121
|
|
4,225,824
|
|
-0- |
Item 3. The proposal to reapprove the performance measures available for
performance-based awards under the Companys amended and restated MIP in order to preserve the
deductibility of such awards under the Federal tax rules was approved, having received the
following votes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Votes Abstained |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
201,884,676
|
|
21,222,235
|
|
4,003,344
|
|
-0- |
Item 4. The appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm for the year ending March 31, 2011 was ratified, having received
the following votes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Votes Abstained |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
217,913,589
|
|
5,456,469
|
|
3,740,197
|
|
-0- |
As shown above, there were no broker non-votes with respect to items two, three and four.
Item 5. The stockholder-submitted proposal on significant executive stock retention
for two years beyond retirement was not approved, having received the following votes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Votes Abstained |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
59,171,002
|
|
146,051,046
|
|
4,257,625
|
|
17,630,582 |
Item 6. The stockholder-submitted proposal on preparing a pay differential
report was not approved, having received the following votes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Votes Abstained |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
14,053,082
|
|
183,006,042
|
|
12,420,549
|
|
17,630,582 |
Each item considered at the 2010 Annual Meeting is described in further detail in the
Companys Definitive Proxy Statement. Other than the six items addressed above and described in
the Definitive Proxy Statement, no other item was submitted at the 2010 Annual Meeting for
stockholder action.
|
|
|
|
|
Under the Companys majority voting standard, the election of a nominee required that the
nominee receive a majority of the votes cast (that is, the number of votes cast for each
nominee had to exceed the number of votes cast against such nominee). Therefore, broker
non-votes and abstentions were required to be disregarded and had no effect on the vote
results. |
|
|
|
Approval of this proposal required the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present,
in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal at the meeting. Therefore,
abstentions, which represented shares present and entitled to vote, had the same effect as a
vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes, if any, were required to be disregarded and had
no effect on the vote results. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
Date: August 3, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
McKesson Corporation
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Laureen E. Seeger
|
|
|
|
Laureen E. Seeger |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel
and Chief Compliance Officer |
|
|