e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark one)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
October 31,
2010
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number
000-06920
Applied Materials,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-1655526
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
3050 Bowers Avenue, P.O. Box 58039
|
|
95052-8039
|
Santa Clara, California
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(408) 727-5555
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known,
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
Aggregate market value of the voting stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant as of May 2, 2010, based
upon the closing sale price reported by the NASDAQ Global Select
Market on that date: $18,484,888,271
Number of shares outstanding of the registrants Common
Stock, $.01 par value, as of November 19, 2010:
1,327,685,208
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for Applied
Materials, Inc.s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held
on March 8, 2011 are incorporated by reference into
Part III of this
Form 10-K.
Caution
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain information in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
(report or
Form 10-K)
of Applied Materials, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Applied or the
Company), including Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
in Item 7, is forward-looking in nature. All statements in
this report, including those made by the management of Applied,
other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking
statements.
Examples of forward-looking statements include statements
regarding Applieds future financial or operating results,
cash flows and cash deployment strategies, declaration of
dividends, share repurchases, business strategies, projected
costs, products, competitive positions, managements plans
and objectives for future operations, research and development,
acquisitions and joint ventures, growth opportunities,
customers, working capital, liquidity, investment portfolio and
policies, and legal proceedings and claims, as well as industry
trends and outlooks. These forward-looking statements are based
on managements estimates, projections and assumptions as
of the date hereof and include the assumptions that underlie
such statements. Forward-looking statements may contain words
such as may, will, should,
could, would, expect,
plan, anticipate, believe,
estimate, potential and
continue, the negative of these terms, or other
comparable terminology. Any expectations based on these
forward-looking statements are subject to risks and
uncertainties and other important factors, including those
discussed in Part II, Item 1A, Risk
Factors, below and elsewhere in this report. Other risks
and uncertainties may be disclosed in Applieds prior
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings. These and many
other factors could affect Applieds future financial
condition and operating results and could cause actual results
to differ materially from expectations based on forward-looking
statements made in this document or elsewhere by Applied or on
its behalf. Applied undertakes no obligation to revise or update
any forward-looking statements.
The following information should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report.
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2010
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
PART I
Incorporated in 1967, Applied, a Delaware corporation, provides
manufacturing equipment, services and software to the global
semiconductor, flat panel display, solar photovoltaic (PV) and
related industries. Applieds customers include
manufacturers of semiconductor wafers and chips, flat panel
liquid crystal displays (LCDs), solar PV cells and modules, and
other electronic devices. These customers may use what they
manufacture in their own end products or sell the items to other
companies for use in advanced electronic components. The
Companys fiscal year ends on the last Sunday in October.
Applied is the worlds largest semiconductor fabrication
equipment supplier based on revenue, with the capability to
provide global deployment and support services. Applied also is
a leading supplier of LCD fabrication equipment to the flat
panel display industry and is the leading supplier of solar PV
manufacturing systems to the solar industry, based on revenue.
Applied operates in four reportable segments: Silicon Systems
Group, Applied Global Services, Display, and Energy and
Environmental Solutions. A summary of financial information for
each reportable segment is found in Note 17 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. A discussion of factors that
could affect Applieds operations is set forth under
Risk Factors in Item 1A, which is incorporated
herein by reference.
Silicon
Systems Group Segment
Applieds Silicon Systems Group segment develops,
manufactures and sells a wide range of manufacturing equipment
used to fabricate semiconductor chips, also referred to as
integrated circuits (ICs). Most chips are built on a silicon
wafer base and include a variety of circuit components, such as
transistors and other devices, that are connected by multiple
layers of wiring (interconnects). Applied offers systems that
perform most of the primary processes used in chip fabrication
including atomic layer deposition (ALD), chemical vapor
deposition (CVD), physical vapor deposition (PVD),
electrochemical deposition (ECD) etch, rapid thermal processing
(RTP), chemical mechanical planarization (CMP), wet cleaning and
wafer metrology and inspection, as well as systems that etch,
measure and inspect circuit patterns on masks used in the
photolithography process. Applieds semiconductor
manufacturing systems are used by integrated device
manufacturers and foundries to build and package memory, logic
and other types of chips.
Most chips currently are fabricated using 65 nanometer (nm) and
larger linewidth dimensions, although Applied is also working
with customers on leading-edge technology for advanced nodes
using 45nm, 32nm and smaller dimensions. To build a chip, the
transistors, capacitors and other circuit components are first
created on the surface of the wafer by performing a series of
processes to deposit and selectively remove portions of
successive film layers. Similar processes are then used to build
the layers of wiring structures on the wafer. As the density of
the circuit components increases to enable greater computing
capability in the same or smaller physical area, the complexity
of building the chip also increases, necessitating more process
steps to form smaller structures and more intricate wiring
schemes. A typical, simplified process sequence for building the
wiring or interconnect portion of a chip involves initially
depositing a dielectric film layer onto the base layer of
circuit components using a CVD system. An etch system is then
used to create openings and patterns in the dielectric layer. To
form the metal interconnects, these openings and patterns are
subsequently filled with conducting material using PVD and ECD
technologies. A CMP step then polishes the wafer to achieve a
flat surface. Additional deposition, etch and CMP steps are then
performed to build up the layers needed to complete the
interconnection of the circuit elements. Advanced chip designs
require more than 500 steps involving these and other processes
to complete the manufacturing cycle.
While some device manufacturers are still using aluminum as the
main conducting material for building interconnect structures,
most have transitioned to copper. Copper has lower resistance
than aluminum and can carry more current in a smaller area.
Applied is the leading supplier of systems for manufacturing
copper-based chips, including equipment for depositing, etching
and planarizing copper interconnect layers. Complementing the
transition to copper to improve chip speed is the use of low
dielectric constant (low k) films to replace silicon
1
dioxide material as the insulator between the copper wiring
structures. Applied also leads the industry in providing systems
for depositing low k dielectric films.
The transistor is another key area of the chip where
semiconductor manufacturers are improving their device designs
to enhance speed. Applied has the industrys largest
portfolio of technically advanced products for building smaller
and faster transistors. One method of enhancing chip performance
is strain engineering, a technique that stretches or compresses
the space between atoms, allowing electrical current to flow
more quickly. Multiple strain films are typically used in
advanced devices since they have an additive effect on
increasing transistor speed. Applied has a comprehensive
portfolio of systems to enable these applications using CVD and
epitaxial deposition technologies.
Major chipmakers have announced that they will be integrating
new high dielectric constant (high-k) and metal materials and
processes in their transistor gate structures to increase chip
performance and reduce power consumption. Applied has a
comprehensive portfolio of fully characterized processes for
building these
high-k/metal
gates. These solutions include an integrated dielectric gate
stack tool that combines four critical processes in a single
system, a portfolio of metallization technologies using ALD and
PVD, and an innovative high temperature etch system.
As new consumer products demand higher performance in a smaller
space, a new type of chip packaging is emerging, known as
three-dimensional (3D) ICs. Providing greater functionality in a
smaller footprint, 3DICs stack multiple chips together and
electrically interconnect them using deep holes, called
through-silicon via (TSV) structures. In fiscal 2010, Applied
acquired Semitool, Inc., a leading supplier of ECD and wafer
surface preparation equipment used by chip packaging companies.
Applied now has the industrys most comprehensive line of
production-proven systems and processes required for the
majority of advanced packaging manufacturing steps, including
etch, CVD, PVD, ECD, wafer cleaning and CMP systems. Applied is
leading efforts to enable the adoption of packaging technology,
working with consortiums and other equipment suppliers to lower
customers implementation costs.
Most of Applieds semiconductor equipment products are
single-wafer systems with multiple process chambers attached to
a base platform. This enables each wafer to be processed
separately in its own environment, allowing precise process
control, while the systems multiple chambers enable
simultaneous, high productivity manufacturing. Applied sells
most of its single-wafer, multi-chamber systems on four basic
platforms: the
Centura®,
the
Endura®,
the
Producer®
and the
Vantage®.
These platforms support ALD, CVD, PVD, etch and RTP technologies.
Over time, the semiconductor industry has migrated to
increasingly larger wafers to build chips. The predominant or
common wafer size used today for volume production of advanced
chips is 300 millimeter (mm), or
12-inch,
wafers. Applied offers a comprehensive range of 300mm systems.
Applied also offers earlier-generation 200mm systems, as well as
products and services to support all of its systems, which are
reported under its Applied Global Services segment.
The following summarizes Applieds portfolio of products
and their associated process technology areas reported under its
Silicon Systems Group segment.
Deposition
Deposition is a fundamental step in fabricating a chip. During
deposition, layers of dielectric (an insulator), barrier, or
electrically conductive (typically metal) films are deposited or
grown on a wafer. Applied currently provides equipment to
perform four types of deposition: ALD, CVD, ECD and PVD. In
addition, Applieds RTP systems can be used to perform
certain types of dielectric deposition.
Atomic
Layer Deposition
ALD is an advanced technology in which atoms are deposited one
layer at a time to build chip structures. This technology
enables customers to fabricate thin films of either conducting
or insulating material with uniform coverage in
sub-nanometer
sized structures. Applied offers ALD chambers for depositing
tungsten and high-k/metal gate films. In 2010, the Company
introduced its Applied Endura iLB PVD/ALD system, an advancement
in ALD technology that
2
enables customers to shrink the contact structures to increase
signal speeds in 22nm and beyond logic and memory devices.
Chemical
Vapor Deposition
CVD is used to deposit dielectric and metal films on a wafer.
During the CVD process, gases that contain atoms of the material
to be deposited react on the wafer surface, forming a thin film
of solid material. Films deposited by CVD may be silicon oxide,
single-crystal epitaxial silicon, amorphous silicon, silicon
nitride, dielectric anti-reflective coatings, low k dielectric
(for highly efficient insulating materials), aluminum, titanium,
titanium nitride, polysilicon, tungsten, refractory metals or
silicides. Applied offers the following CVD products and
technologies:
The Applied Producer CVD platform This
high-throughput platform features
Twin-Chamber®
modules that have two single-wafer process chambers per unit. Up
to three Twin-Chamber modules can be mounted on each Producer
platform, giving it a simultaneous processing capacity of six
wafers. Many dielectric CVD processes can be performed on this
platform. The highest productivity model of this system is the
Applied Producer GT, which has achieved rapid customer
acceptance due to its fast wafer handling performance and
compact design.
Low k Dielectric Films Low k dielectric
materials are used in copper-based chip designs to further
improve interconnect speed. Using conventional CVD equipment,
the Applied Producer Black
Diamond®
family of low k systems provides customers with a proven,
cost-effective way to integrate a variety of low k films into
advanced interconnect structures. To further increase the
performance of the complete multi-layer dielectric structure,
Applied offers a line of
BLOKtm
(barrier low k) films deposited with the Producer system.
Lithography-Enabling Solutions Applied offers
several technologies on the Producer system to help chipmakers
extend their current 193nm lithography tools, including a line
of Applied
APF®
(advanced patterning film) films and Applied
DARC®
(dielectric anti-reflective coating) films. Together, they
provide a film stack with the precise dimensional control and
compatibility needed to cost-effectively pattern nano-scale
features without additional integration complexity.
Gap Fill Films There are many steps during
the chipmaking process in which very small and deep, or high
aspect ratio (HAR), structures must be filled void-free with a
dielectric film. Many of these applications include the
deposition of silicon oxides in substrate isolation structures,
contacts and interconnects. The Applied Centura Ultima
HDP-CVD®
(high-density plasma CVD) and Applied Producer
HARPtm
(high aspect ratio process) systems have been workhorses for the
industry, enabling customers to scale their devices to the 32nm
node. In 2010, the Company introduced its breakthrough Applied
Producer
Eternatm
FCVD system. Targeted for 20nm and below chips, the Eterna
system delivers a liquid-like film that flows freely into
virtually any structure to provide void-free dielectric fill.
Strain Engineering Solutions The Applied
Producer HARP system also plays a key role in enhancing
transistor performance, enabling chipmakers to boost chip speed
by depositing strain-inducing dielectric films. Offering the
industrys first integrated stress nitride deposition and
ultraviolet (UV) cure solution, the Applied Producer Celera CVD
delivers benchmark levels of high-stress tensile silicon nitride
films. The Company also offers the Applied Centura SiNgenPlus
low pressure CVD system for low temperature silicon nitride
films. Used together, and in conjunction with silicon germanium
(SiGe) films using Applieds epitaxial deposition
technologies, these systems can provide additive strain
engineering benefits.
Through-Silicon Via Films In 2010, Applied
expanded its offerings for TSV fabrication, with two new CVD
systems. The Applied Producer
InViatm
system uses a unique process to deposit the critical oxide liner
film layer in HAR TSV structures, enabling robust electrical
isolation of the TSV, which is vital for reliable device
performance. For applications where higher temperatures can
damage the manufacturing process, the Applied Producer
Avilatm
CVD system allows high quality dielectric film deposition at
stable substrate temperatures at a low cost of ownership.
Epitaxial Deposition Epitaxial silicon
(epitaxy or epi) is a layer of pure silicon grown in a uniform
crystalline structure on the wafer to form a high quality base
for the device circuitry. Epi technology is used in an
increasing number of integrated circuit devices in both the
wafer substrate and transistor areas of a chip to
3
enhance speed. The Applied Centura Epi system integrates pre-
and post-epi processes on the same system to improve film
quality and reduce production costs. This system is also used
for SiGe epi technology, which reduces power usage and increases
speed in certain types of advanced chips. For emerging
transistor designs, the Applied Centura RP Epi system offers
selective epi processes to enable faster transistor switching
through strain engineering techniques.
Polysilicon Deposition Polysilicon is a type
of silicon used to form portions of the transistor structure
within the integrated circuit device. The Applied Centura
Polygentm
LPCVD system is a single-wafer, multi-chamber product that
deposits thin polysilicon films at high temperatures to create
transistor gate structures. To address the challenging
requirements of shrinking gate dimensions, the Applied Centura
DPN Gate Stack system integrates chambers for decoupled plasma
nitridation (DPN), RTP anneal and polysilicon deposition on one
platform to enable superior film quality and material properties.
Tungsten Deposition Tungsten is used in the
contact area of a chip that connects the transistors to the
wiring circuitry. In aluminum-based devices, tungsten is also
used in the structures that connect the multiple layers of
aluminum wiring. Applied has two products for depositing
tungsten: the Applied Centura
Sprint®
Tungsten CVD system for 90nm and below devices and the Applied
Centura iSprint ALD/CVD system for more advanced applications.
The latter product combines ALD technology and CVD chambers on
the same platform.
Electrochemical
Deposition
Electrochemical deposition is a process by which metal atoms
from a chemical fluid (an electrolyte) are deposited on the
surface of an immersed object. Its main application in the
semiconductor industry is to deposit copper in interconnect
wiring structures. This process step follows the deposition of
barrier and seed layers which prevent the copper from
contaminating other areas of the device and improve the adhesion
of the copper filmenable electrodeposition to occur. As a result
of Applieds acquisition of Semitool, the Company offers
two ECD systems: the Applied Raider ECD for electroplating
advanced chip interconnect structures, and the Applied Raider S
ECD for advanced TSV packaging applications.
Physical
Vapor Deposition
PVD is a physical process in which atoms of a gas, such as
argon, are accelerated toward a metal target. The metal atoms
chip off, or sputter away, and are then deposited on the wafer.
The Applied Endura PVD system offers a broad range of advanced
metal deposition processes, including aluminum, aluminum alloys,
cobalt,
titanium/titanium
nitride, tantalum/tantalum nitride, tungsten/tungsten nitride,
nickel, vanadium and copper. In 2010, Applied celebrated the
20th year of its Applied Endura platform, the most successful
metal deposition system in the history of the semiconductor
industry.
The Applied Endura CuBS (copper barrier/seed) PVD system is
widely used by customers for fabricating copper-based chips.
Using PVD technology, the system deposits a tantalum-based
barrier film that prevents copper material from entering other
areas of the device and then a copper seed layer that primes the
structure for the subsequent deposition of bulk copper. The
Applied Endura CuBS RFX PVD system extends cost-effective CuBS
technology to the 22nm node. In 2010, Applied introduced two new
PVD systems for creating the leading-edge chips needed for the
next generation of smart devices. The Applied Endura
Avenirtm
RF PVD system sequentially deposits the multiple metal film
layers that form the heart of the industrys new, faster,
metal gate transistors. The Applied Endura iLB PVD/ALD system
advances the
state-of-the-art
in ALD technology, enabling customers to shrink their
speed-critical contact structures for 20nm and below devices.
Applieds Endura system has also been used for many years
in back-end applications to deposit metal layers before final
bump or wire bonding packaging steps are performed. The Applied
Chargertm
UBM PVD system, which is specifically designed for under-bump
metallization (UBM) and other back-end processes, features
linear architecture for reliable performance and very high
productivity at a low cost per wafer.
4
Etch
Etching is used many times throughout the integrated circuit
manufacturing process to selectively remove material from the
surface of a wafer. Before etching begins, the wafer is coated
with a light-sensitive film, called photoresist. A
photolithography process then projects the circuit pattern onto
the wafer. Etching removes material only from areas dictated by
the photoresist pattern. Applied offers a wide range of systems
for etching dielectric, metal and silicon films to meet the
requirements of
sub-100nm
processing.
Applieds Producer Etch system utilizes the Companys
Twin-Chamber Producer platform to target cost-sensitive
dielectric etch applications. To address advanced dielectric
etch applications, the Applied Centura
Enabler®
E5 Etch system enables customers to create the 40:1 HAR contact
features that are critical to the yield and performance of 32nm
and below DRAM and Flash memory chips. The Applied Centura
Carinatm
system uses innovative, high-temperature technology to deliver
the etch capability essential for scaling logic and memory
devices with high-k/metal gates at 45nm and below.
In 2010, the Company introduced its Applied Centura
AdvantEdgetm
Mesatm
silicon etch system for fabricating nano-scale circuit features
with angstrom-level precision. The system has achieved strong
acceptance by customers, providing the critical technical
capability needed for their next-generation devices. The Applied
Centura
Marianatm
Trench Etch system provides customers with the capability to
scale DRAM capacitors by enabling the etching of 80:1 aspect
ratio structures. The Applied Centura
Silviatm
system is specifically designed for etching small, deep holes
for TSV applications in 3D-ICs. For etching metals, the Applied
Opustm
AdvantEdge Metal Etch uses an optimized 5-chamber platform
configuration that enables customers to extend aluminum
interconnect technology and productivity for flash and DRAM
memory applications.
Rapid
Thermal Processing
RTP is a process in which a wafer is subjected to rapid bursts
of intense heat that can take the wafer from room temperature to
more than 1,000 degrees Celsius in less than 10 seconds. A rapid
thermal process is used mainly for annealing, which modifies the
properties of deposited films. The Applied Centura
Radiance®Plus
and Applied Vantage
RadOxtm
RTP systems feature advanced RTP technology with differing
platform designs. While the multi-chamber Centura platform
offers exceptional process flexibility, the streamlined
two-chamber Vantage platform is designed for dedicated
high-volume manufacturing. These single-wafer RTP systems are
also used for growing high quality oxide and oxynitride films,
deposition steps that traditional large batch furnaces can no
longer achieve with the necessary precision and control. With
its proprietary radical-based oxidation process, the Applied
Vantage RadOx system deposits high-performance transistor gate
oxides with high productivity and low operating cost for flash
memory applications. In 2010, the Company introduced its
laser-based Applied Vantage
Astratm
millisecond anneal system for creating the sensitive nickel
silicide transistor contact layers, enabling faster, lower
power-consumption logic chips.
Chemical
Mechanical Planarization
The CMP process removes material from a wafer to create a flat
(planarized) surface. This process allows subsequent
photolithography patterning steps to occur with greater accuracy
and enables film layers to build with minimal height variations.
Applied has led the industry with its 300mm Applied
Reflexion®
LK system, with features such as integrated cleaning, film
measurement and process control capabilities. In 2010, Applied
introduced its Applied Reflexion GT CMP system, an innovative
dual-wafer design that increases performance while lowering
system cost of ownership in fabricating copper interconnects.
Surface
Preparation
Cleaning the surface of the wafer is critical to the adhesion
and quality of films that are subsequently deposited in the chip
fabrication process. Through its acquisition of Semitool,
Applied offers several surface preparation systems. The Applied
Raider SP can incorporate several types of cleaning methods,
including spray, vapor, immersion, megasonics and anneal
technologies with automated single or dual-side wafer processing
for high volume manufacturing.
5
Metrology
and Wafer Inspection
Applied offers several products for measuring features and
inspecting defects on the wafer during various stages of the
fabrication process. These systems enable customers to
characterize and control critical dimension (CD) and defect
issues, especially at advanced generation technology nodes.
Critical
Dimension and Defect Review Scanning Electron Microscopes
(CD-SEMs and DR-SEMs)
Scanning electron microscopes (SEMs) use an electron beam to
form images of microscopic features of a patterned wafer at
extremely high magnification. Applieds SEM products
provide customers with full automation, along with the high
accuracy and sensitivity needed for measuring very small CDs.
The Applied
VeritySEM®
metrology system uses proprietary SEM imaging technology to
enable precise control of the lithography and etching processes.
The VeritySEM measures CDs at a precision of less than 0.3nm, a
requirement for 32nm and below device production and
incorporates automation and software advancements for
significantly higher throughput. Applieds OPC
Checktm
software for the VeritySEM system performs automated
qualification of OPC-based (optical proximity correction) chip
designs, significantly reducing mask (see Mask Making section
below) verification time over conventional manual methods.
DR-SEMs review defects on the wafer (such as particles,
scratches or residues) that are first located by a defect
detection system and then classify the defects to identify their
source. The high-throughput, fully automatic Applied
SEMVisiontm
Defect Analysis products enable customers to use this technology
as an integral part of their production lines to analyze defects
as small as 30nm with industry-leading throughput.
Wafer
Inspection
Using laser-based technology, defects can be detected on
patterned wafers (wafers with printed circuit images) as they
move between processing steps. Defects include particles, open
circuit lines, and shorts between lines. Incorporating key
advances in imaging technology, the Applied
ComPlustm
Inspection system, for darkfield applications, detects defects
in devices with advanced design rules with the high speed
required for customers volume production lines. The
Applied
UVision®
4 wafer Inspection system was introduced in 2010, enabling
customers to detect yield-limiting defects in the critical
patterning layers of 22nm and below logic and memory devices
using DUV laser-based imaging technology.
Mask
Making
Masks are used by photolithography systems to transfer
microscopic circuit designs onto wafers. Since an imperfection
in a mask may be replicated on the wafer, the mask must be
virtually defect-free. Applied provides systems for etching and
inspecting masks.
In 2010, the Company introduced its Applied Centura
Tetratm
X Advanced Reticle Etch system, an advanced etch tool for
fabricating leading-edge masks at 22nm and beyond.
Applieds Tetra line of systems has been used by mask
makers worldwide to etch the majority of high-end masks over the
last five years. Applied also introduced the Applied
Aera3tm
Mask Inspection system which allows customers to meet the most
critical defect detection challenges of 22nm masks. Using
sophisticated aerial imaging technology, the Aera3 allows users
to immediately see how the pattern on the mask will appear on
the wafer, revealing only the defects most likely to print and
significantly reducing inspection time.
Applied
Global Services Segment
The Applied Global Services segment encompasses products and
services designed to improve the performance and productivity,
and reduce the environmental impact of the fab operations of
semiconductor, LCD and solar PV manufacturers. The in-depth
expertise and best known methods of Applieds extensive
global support infrastructure enable Applied to continuously
support customers production requirements. Trained
customer engineers and process support engineers are deployed in
more than a dozen countries. These engineers are usually
6
located at or near customers fab sites and service over
34,000 installed Applied systems, as well as non-Applied
systems. Applied offers the following general types of services
and products:
Fab Services Applied offers a portfolio of
fab-wide operations services to maintain and optimize
customers fabrication facilities. Applied Performance
Services offers customers comprehensive equipment support with
performance-based pricing and predictable costs to enable
improved cost of ownership. Included in this program is
Applieds ExpertConnect remote diagnostic capability,
providing expert support around the clock. The Company also
offers Performance Services for solar PV manufacturing. The
first service product of its kind for the solar industry, the
program enables customers to quickly ramp to volume production
while optimizing the performance, cost and output of their
manufacturing lines.
The Company also offers Performance Spares, which are spare
parts manufactured to Applieds strict technical
specifications and quality standards. Applieds Metron
Chamber Performance Services unit provides precision cleaning,
technology-enhanced coating and refurbishment on chamber process
kits and components. The unit also has extensive analytical
testing capabilities to validate and certify performance
specifications.
In addition, Applied offers a wide range of products and
services to extend the productive life of 200mm semiconductor
fabs, including new and remanufactured 200mm equipment, system
enhancements and fab transition services. Designed to maximize
productivity and lower cost of ownership, these products also
assist customers in implementing green manufacturing solutions.
Applieds 200mm systems are available in a broad range of
production-proven technologies, including CVD, PVD, etch,
implant, RTP, CMP, epitaxy, metrology and inspection tools.
Automation Systems Applied offers automated
factory-level and tool-level control software systems for
semiconductor, LCD and solar cell manufacturing facilities.
These enterprise solutions include manufacturing execution
systems (MES) to automate the production of wafers and LCD and
solar substrates, advanced process control systems, and
scheduling and materials handling control systems. In 2010, the
Company introduced its Applied
SmartFactorytm
MES software, a factory automation solution designed to help
accelerate the production ramp of emerging technologies for
solar PV, chip-packaging, and light-emitting diode (LED)
applications.
Applied also offers computerized maintenance management systems,
performance tracking, and modeling and simulation tools for
improving asset utilization. Applieds E3 equipment
engineering system solution, for example, uniquely integrates
all critical equipment automation and process control
components. In 2010, the Company introduced its Applied
SmartSchedtm
system, the semiconductor industrys first predictive
scheduling solution for optimizing the movement of wafers during
the lithography process to reduce cycle time and increase tool
utilization.
Sub-Fab
Systems A significant component of solar PV chip
manufacturing is the ancillary equipment such as pumps and
abatement systems that are connected to the process chambers.
Located outside the clean area of the facility in the
sub-fab,
this equipment controls fab emissions to assure clean,
sustainable chip manufacturing.
Abatement Control Systems In 2010, the
Company introduced its Applied
iSYStm
platform, the industrys first fully-integrated abatement
and vacuum pumping solution for controlling emissions and
reducing energy costs in the fab. Synchronized with an Applied
process tool, the iSYS system can deliver typical annual savings
in power, water and gas consumption equivalent to 200MWh of
energy compared to currently available technologies.
Display
Segment
Applieds AKT subsidiary, reported under the Display
segment, designs, manufactures and sells equipment to fabricate
thin film transistor LCDs for televisions, computer displays and
other consumer-oriented electronic applications. While
similarities exist between the technologies utilized in
chipmaking and LCD fabrication, the most significant differences
are in the size and composition of the substrate. Substrates
used to manufacture LCD panels can be more than 70 times larger
in area than 300mm wafers and are made of glass, while wafers
are made of silicon.
Applied supplies a wide range of systems that process and test
different glass substrate sizes. For fabricating the transistor
layer of these panels, the Company offers a line of
plasma-enhanced CVD (PECVD) systems that use
7
multi-chamber platform architecture to deposit dielectric and
semiconducting films. The
AKT-PiVottm
55KV system employs high-productivity, cost-efficient PVD
technology to deposit metal and transparent conductive oxide
films on the substrate. For manufacturing the color filter of
LCD panels, Applied offers the AKT-NEW
ARISTOtm
for transparent conductive oxide film deposition.
To complement these systems, Applied also offers a line of
electron beam test (EBT) systems for testing substrates during
production for defective pixels and other imperfections.
Featuring one of the industrys fastest and most accurate
pixel test technologies with the lowest operating cost, the EBT
systems non-contact test technology enables the safe
testing of high-value LCD TV panels without damaging or
scratching the display.
To meet growing consumer demand for larger, more cost-effective
LCD TVs, LCD manufacturers have moved to increasingly
larger-sized substrates. Applieds latest generation (Gen)
10 systems can process substrates sized at approximately 2.85 x
3.05 meters, with each substrate enabling the production of up
to six
65-inch LCD
TV screens. These Gen-10 systems include the AKT-90K PECVD and
the Gen-10 AKT-90K EBT products.
Energy
and Environmental Solutions Segment
The Energy and Environmental Solutions segment includes
manufacturing solutions for the generation and conservation of
energy. To increase the conversion efficiency and yields of
solar PV devices, Applied offers manufacturing solutions for
wafer-based crystalline silicon (c-Si) and glass based thin film
applications.
Applieds portfolio of solar PV cell fabrication
technologies has made it a leading supplier of c-Si
manufacturing systems worldwide. Key benefits of these systems
are high-productivity, advanced ultra-thin wafer handling, and
extensive automation, helping customers to lower the cost per
watt of electricity from solar PVs. Applied offers a
comprehensive line of automated metallization and test systems
for c-Si cell manufacturing. The Applied Baccini systems offer
high-precision printing capability designed to increase the
efficiency of c-Si solar cells. Applied also offers systems for
slicing and squaring wafers from silicon ingots. The high
productivity and performance of the Applied HCT B5 platform have
made it the leading wire saw used by solar PV cell manufacturers
worldwide. The Company also offers the Applied HCT Diamond
Squarertm
system, which uses diamond wire technology to eliminate the need
for abrasive slurry and reduces electricity consumption.
Thin film solar technologies are ideally suited for large-scale
applications, such as utility scale solar farms and commercial
rooftops, where space is not a constraint. The Company offers
the Applied AKT PECVD system for depositing low temperature
polysilicon films for thin film applications. Applied also
offers the
ATONtm
in-line deposition system, a large-area platform for
high-quality deposition and high-throughput in both c-Si and
thin film solar PV manufacturing.
Prior to the third quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied offered its
fully-integrated
SunFabtm
production line for manufacturing large-size thin film panels.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied restructured its
Energy and Environmental Solutions segment in response to
adverse market conditions for thin film solar, including delays
in utility-scale solar adoption, solar panel manufacturers
challenges in obtaining affordable capital, changes and
uncertainty in government renewable energy policies, and
competitive pressure from c-Si solar technologies. As part of
the restructuring, Applied discontinued sales to new customers
of its fully-integrated SunFab lines, but will offer individual
tools for thin film solar manufacturing. Applied is supporting
existing SunFab line customers with services, upgrades and
capacity increases through its Applied Global Services segment
and will continue RD&E efforts to improve thin film panel
efficiency and high-productivity deposition.
Other products offered under the Energy and Environmental
Solutions segment include
roll-to-roll,
vacuum web coating systems for high-performance deposition of a
range of films on flexible substrates for functional, aesthetic
or optical properties. The Companys Applied
Topmettm
4450, is the worlds largest and fastest
roll-to-roll
machine for depositing ultra-thin aluminum films for flexible
packaging applications.
Backlog
Applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order
backlog and customer commitments. Backlog consists of:
(1) orders for which written authorizations have been
accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next
12 months, or shipment has occurred but revenue has not
been recognized; (2) contractual service
8
revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next
12 months; and (3) orders for SunFab lines that are
anticipated to be recognized as revenue within the next
12 months.
Applieds backlog increased from $2.7 billion at
October 25, 2009 to $3.2 billion at October 31,
2010. Applieds backlog on any particular date is not
necessarily indicative of actual sales for any succeeding
period. Customers may delay delivery of products or cancel
orders prior to shipment, subject to possible cancellation
penalties. Delays in delivery schedules
and/or a
reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a
material adverse effect on Applieds business and results
of operations.
Manufacturing,
Raw Materials and Supplies
Applieds manufacturing activities consist primarily of
procurement, assembly, test and integration of various
proprietary and commercial parts, components and subassemblies
(collectively, parts) that are used to manufacture systems.
Manufacturing requires raw materials, including a wide variety
of mechanical and electrical components, to be manufactured to
Applieds specifications. Applied uses numerous companies,
including contract manufacturers, to supply parts and assembly
services for the manufacture and support of its products.
Although Applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts
are available from multiple qualified suppliers, this is not
always possible. Accordingly, some key parts may be obtained
from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers.
Applied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of
production and service interruptions, as well as shortages of
key parts, by: (1) selecting and qualifying alternate
suppliers for key parts; (2) monitoring the financial
condition of key suppliers; (3) maintaining appropriate
inventories of key parts; (4) qualifying new parts on a
timely basis; and (5) locating certain manufacturing
operations in areas that are closer to suppliers and customers
Applied is implementing a more distributed manufacturing model,
which includes transitioning certain manufacturing and supply
chain activities from the United States and Europe to Singapore,
Taiwan and other countries in Asia and completing assembly of
some systems at the customer site.
Research,
Development and Engineering
Applieds long-term growth strategy requires continued
development of new products. Applieds significant
investment in research, development and engineering (RD&E)
has generally enabled it to deliver new products and
technologies before the emergence of strong demand, thus
allowing customers to incorporate these products into their
manufacturing plans at an early stage in the technology
selection cycle. Applied works closely with its global customers
to design systems and processes that meet their planned
technical and production requirements. Product development and
engineering organizations are located primarily in the United
States, as well as in Europe, Israel, Taiwan and China. In
addition, Applied outsources certain RD&E activities, some
of which are performed outside the United States, primarily in
India. Process support and customer demonstration laboratories
are located in the United States, China, Taiwan, Europe and
Israel.
Applieds investments in RD&E for product development
and engineering programs to create or improve products and
technologies over the last three years were as follows:
$1.1 billion (12 percent of net sales) in fiscal 2010,
$934 million (19 percent of net sales) in fiscal 2009
and $1.1 billion (14 percent of net sales) in fiscal
2008. Applied has spent an average of 13 percent of net
sales in RD&E over the last five years. In addition to
RD&E for specific product technologies, Applied maintains
ongoing programs for automation control systems, materials
research and environmental control that are applicable to its
products.
In fiscal 2010, Applied developed new technology to enable
next-generation 22nm and below chip designs. These systems were
designed to help customers continue their drive to pack more
transistors in the same space using using high-k/metal gate
technologies and double patterning processes. Applied also
developed technology for through-silicon vias (TSVs), an
emerging solution for interconnecting three dimensional chip
stacks to provide better device performance, lower power
consumption and the integration of heterogeneous devices. In the
solar PV area, Applied continued the development of its
precision wafering and cell manufacturing products for lowering
the cost of producing solar-generated electricity through
advanced crystalline silicon technology. RD&E also included
activities to develop products that enable lower-cost production
of solar energy, production of light emitting diode (LED)
devices for display backlighting and general lighting, and other
products to enable energy conservation.
9
In fiscal 2009, Applied focused on developing systems for
semiconductor customers new chip designs with 32nm and
below geometries, including systems to enable faster transistors
using strain engineering and
high-k/metal
gate technologies, as well as double patterning processes that
enable customers to extend their existing 193nm lithography
tools through additional technology generations. Applied also
focused on developing technology for manufacturing next
generation displays. RD&E also included activities to
develop products that enable lower-cost production of solar
energy and other products to enable energy conservation.
In fiscal 2008, Applied focused on the development of processes
and systems for the continued scaling of semiconductor devices.
Applied pioneered a self-aligned double patterning approach that
can enable 22nm and below device fabrication using conventional
optical lithography. The Company also developed technology for
the implementation of through-silicon vias. Efforts were also
focused on developing the systems and technology to reduce the
cost-per-watt
of solar electricity.
Marketing
and Sales
Net sales by geographic region, which are attributed according
to the location of customers facilities, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
1,837
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Korea
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
China
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Southeast Asia
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
7,421
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
3,295
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
5,660
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
North America(*)
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
9,549
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
5,014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
8,129
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Primarily the United States. |
Because of the highly technical nature of its products, Applied
markets and sells products worldwide through a direct sales
force. Approximately 88 percent of Applieds fiscal
2010 net sales were to regions outside of the
United States.
General economic conditions impact Applieds business and
financial results. From time to time, the markets in which
products are sold experience weak economic conditions that may
negatively impact sales. Applieds business is usually not
seasonal in nature, but it is highly cyclical, based on capital
equipment investment by major semiconductor, flat panel display,
solar PV and other manufacturers. Customers expenditures
depend on many factors, including: anticipated market demand and
pricing for semiconductors, LCDs, solar cells and modules, and
other substrates; the development of new technologies;
customers factory utilization; capital resources and
financing; and global and regional economic conditions.
Applied manages its business and reports financial results based
on the segments described above, but does not allocate certain
sales and marketing costs to the segments.
Information on net sales to unaffiliated customers and
long-lived assets attributable to Applieds geographic
regions is included in Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements. The following companies accounted
10
for at least 10 percent of Applieds net sales in
2010, 2009,
and/or 2008,
which were for products in multiple reportable segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Intel Corporation
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
*
|
|
Competition
The industries in which Applied operates are highly competitive
and characterized by rapid technological change. Applieds
ability to compete generally depends on its ability to timely
commercialize its technology, continually improve its products
and develop new products that meet constantly evolving customer
requirements. Significant competitive factors include technical
capability and differentiation, productivity and
cost-effectiveness. The importance of these factors varies
according to customers needs, including product mix and
respective product requirements, applications, and the timing
and circumstances of purchasing decisions. Substantial
competition exists in all areas of Applieds business.
Competitors range from small companies that compete with a
single product
and/or in a
single region, to global, diversified companies with a range of
products. Applieds ability to compete requires a high
level of investment in RD&E, marketing and sales and global
customer support activities. Management believes that many of
Applieds products have strong competitive positions.
The competitive environment for each segment is described below:
The semiconductor industry has been increasingly driven by
consumer demand for lower-cost electronic products with
increased capability and, to a lesser extent, by demand for
commercial applications. As a result, products within the
Silicon Systems Group segment are subject to rapid changes in
customer requirements, including transitions to smaller
dimensions, new materials and an increasing number of
applications. While certain existing technologies may be adapted
to new requirements, some applications create the need for an
entirely different technical approach. The rapid pace of
technological change can quickly diminish the value of current
technologies and products and create opportunities for existing
and new competitors. Applied offers a broad portfolio of
technically- differentiated products that must continuously
evolve to satisfy customers requirements in order to
compete effectively. Applied allocates resources among its
numerous product offerings and therefore may decide not to
invest in an individual product to the same degree as
competitors who specialize in fewer products. There are a number
of competitors serving the semiconductor manufacturing equipment
industry, with some offering a single product line and others
offering multiple product lines. These competitors range from
suppliers serving a single region to global, diversified
companies. Factors that influenced the competitive environment
for the Silicon Systems Group in fiscal 2010 included the
rebound in the semiconductor industry, driven by higher demand
for PCs and cell phones as well as the introduction of tablet
computers. Higher factory utilization rates and tight device
supply led manufacturers to increase their wafer fab equipment
(WFE) capital spending, which is the major driver for Silicon
Systems Group net sales.
Products and services within the Applied Global Services segment
are characterized by demanding worldwide service requirements
and a diverse group of numerous competitors. To compete
effectively, Applied offers products and services to reduce
costs, improve productivity, and lessen the environmental impact
of customers fab operations. Significant competitive
factors include productivity, cost-effectiveness, and the level
of technical service and support. The importance of these
factors varies according to customers needs and the type
of products or services offered. Customers with more significant
operations
and/or
expertise may require fewer service products than customers who
place greater reliance on an outsourcing model. Industry
conditions that affected Applied Global Services sales of
spares and services in fiscal 2010 were principally
semiconductor manufacturers wafer starts as well as
additions to the tool installed base.
Products in the Display segment are subject to strong
competition from a number of major competitors. Applied holds
established market positions with its technically-differentiated
thin film technology (TFT)-LCD manufacturing solutions for
PECVD, color filter PVD and TFT array testing, although its
market position could
11
change quickly due to customers evolving requirements. The
competitive environment for Applieds Display segment in
fiscal 2010 was characterized by increased capacity requirements
for larger flat panel televisions and growing global demand for
touch screen devices.
Applieds products within the Energy and Environmental
Solutions segment compete in diverse market areas, including
equipment to make solar PV cells and modules. All of these
markets are driven by extreme pressure to reduce overall
production costs and improve cell performance. In this segment,
Applied offers products primarily for c-Si wafer-based
applications. Applied competes with many other companies, some
of which have more experience with solar applications and some
of which are just entering the solar equipment business.
Patents
and Licenses
Management believes that Applieds competitive position
significantly depends upon the Companys research,
development, engineering, manufacturing and marketing
capabilities, and not just on its patent position. However,
protection of Applieds technological assets through
enforcement of its intellectual property rights, including
patents, is important. Therefore, Applieds practice is to
file patent applications in the United States and other
countries for inventions that Applied considers significant.
Applied has a substantial number of patents in the United States
and other countries, and additional applications are pending for
new inventions. Although Applied does not consider its business
materially dependent upon any one patent, the rights of Applied
and the products made and sold under its patents, taken as a
whole, are a significant element of Applieds business. In
addition to patents, Applied also possesses other intellectual
property, including trademarks, know-how, trade secrets and
copyrights.
Applied enters into patent and technology licensing agreements
with other companies when management determines that it is in
the Companys best interest to do so. Applied pays
royalties under existing patent license agreements for the use,
in several of its products, of certain patented technologies
that are licensed to Applied for the life of the patents.
Applied also receives royalties from licenses granted to third
parties. Royalties received from or paid to third parties have
not been, and are not expected to be, material to Applieds
consolidated results of operations.
In the normal course of business, Applied periodically receives
and makes inquiries regarding possible patent infringement. In
responding to such inquiries, it may become necessary or useful
for Applied to obtain or grant licenses or other rights.
However, there can be no assurance that such licenses or rights
will be available to Applied on commercially reasonable terms,
or at all. If Applied is not able to resolve or settle claims,
obtain necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms,
and/or
successfully prosecute or defend its position, Applieds
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
Environmental
Matters
Applied maintains a number of environmental, health and safety
programs that are primarily preventive in nature. As part of
these programs, Applied regularly monitors ongoing compliance
with applicable laws and regulations. In addition, Applied has
trained personnel to conduct investigations of any
environmental, health or safety incidents, including, without
limitation, spills, releases or possible contamination.
Compliance with federal, state and local environmental, health
and safety provisions, including, without limitation, those
regulating the discharge of materials into the environment,
remedial agreements and other actions relating to the
environment have not had, and are not expected to have, a
material effect on Applieds capital expenditures,
competitive position, financial condition or results of
operations.
The most recent report on Applieds environmental, health
and safety activities can be found in the Companys
Citizenship Report on its website at
http://www.appliedmaterials.com/about/environment.html
with additional information at
http://www.appliedmaterials.com/about/cr/sustainability.
The Citizenship Report is updated periodically. This website
address is intended to be an inactive textual reference only.
None of the information on Applieds website is part of
this
Form 10-K
or is incorporated by reference herein.
Employees
At October 31, 2010, Applied employed approximately 13,000
regular employees and 1,325 temporary employees. In the
high-technology industry, competition for highly-skilled
employees is intense. Applied believes
12
that its future success is highly dependent upon its continued
ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified employees.
There can be no assurance that Applied will be able to attract,
hire, assimilate, motivate and retain a sufficient number of
qualified employees.
Executive
Officers of the Registrant
The following table and notes set forth information about
Applieds executive officers as of October 31, 2010:
|
|
|
Name of Individual
|
|
Position
|
|
Michael R. Splinter(1)
|
|
Chairman of Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive
Officer
|
George S. Davis(2)
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|
Mark R. Pinto(3)
|
|
Executive Vice President, General Manager Energy and
Environmental Solutions and Display, Chief Technology Officer
|
Randhir Thakur(4)
|
|
Executive Vice President, General Manager Silicon Systems
|
Joseph Flanagan(5)
|
|
Senior Vice President, Worldwide Operations and Supply Chain
|
Manfred Kerschbaum(6)
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief of Staff
|
Joseph J. Sweeney(7)
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
|
Chris Bowers(8)
|
|
Group Vice President, Corporate Initiatives
|
Ron Kifer(9)
|
|
Group Vice President, Chief Information Officer
|
Mary Humiston(10)
|
|
Group Vice President, Global Human Resources
|
Charlie Pappis(11)
|
|
Group Vice President, General Manager Applied Global Services
|
Thomas S. Timko(12)
|
|
Corporate Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Splinter, age 60, was named President, Chief
Executive Officer and a member of Applieds Board of
Directors upon joining Applied in April 2003, and he has been
Chairman of the Board of Directors since March 2009. Prior to
joining Applied, Mr. Splinter worked for nearly
20 years at Intel Corporation (Intel), most recently as
Executive Vice President and Director of the Sales and Marketing
Group, responsible for sales and operations worldwide.
Mr. Splinter previously held various executive positions at
Intel, including Executive Vice President and General Manager of
the Technology and Manufacturing Group. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Davis, age 53, was promoted to Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer in December 2006, after being
appointed Group Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
effective November 2006. Previously, he had been Group Vice
President, General Manager, Corporate Business Development since
February 2005. From November 1999 to February 2005,
Mr. Davis served as Vice President and Corporate Treasurer,
where he managed Applieds worldwide treasury operations
and was responsible for investments, tax, financial risk
management, and trade and export matters. Mr. Davis joined
Applied in 1999. |
|
(3) |
|
Dr. Pinto, age 51, has served as Executive Vice
President since joining Applied in January 2004. His current
responsibility is General Manager, Energy and Environmental
Solutions and Display as well as corporate Chief Technology
Officer. Prior to joining Applied, Dr. Pinto spent
19 years with Bell Laboratories and the Lucent
Microelectronics Group, which later became Agere Systems Inc.,
most recently as Vice President of the Analog Products Division.
Dr. Pinto holds a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from
Stanford University. |
|
(4) |
|
Dr. Thakur, age 48, has held the position of Executive
Vice President, General Manager Silicon Systems since October
2009. Previously, he was Senior Vice President, General Manager,
Thin Film Solar and Display. He was appointed Senior Vice
President, General Manager, Strategic Operations when he
rejoined Applied in May 2008. He previously was with Applied
from 2000 to 2005 in a variety of executive roles including
Group Vice President, General Manager for Front End Products.
From September 2005 to May 2008, Dr. Thakur served as
Executive Vice President of Technology and Fab Operations at
SanDisk Corporation and as head of SanDisks worldwide
operations. Prior to joining Applied in 2000, Dr. Thakur
served in leadership roles at Steag Electronic Systems AG and
Micron Technology, Inc. |
13
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Flanagan, age 39, was appointed Senior Vice
President, Worldwide Operations and Supply Chain in February
2010. Prior to joining Applied, Mr. Flanagan held executive
positions in global operations for Nortel Networks Corporation,
including president of Nortel Business Services from August 2009
to February 2010. Previously, Mr. Flanagan held a number of
positions from 1993 to 2006 at General Electric. |
|
(6) |
|
Mr. Kerschbaum, age 56, was named Senior Vice
President, Chief of Staff in September 2009. Prior to that he
served as Senior Vice President, General Manager, Applied Global
Services from January 2005 to September 2009.
Mr. Kerschbaum was Senior Vice President, Global Operations
from July 2004 to January 2005 and from October 2002 to May
2003. From May 2003 to July 2004, he was Group Vice President,
Foundation Engineering and Operations. From January 1996 to
October 2002, he held various positions in Applied Materials
North America, most recently as Group Vice President, General
Manager, Applied Materials North America.
Mr. Kerschbaum has served in various other operations,
customer service and engineering positions since joining Applied
in 1983. |
|
(7) |
|
Mr. Sweeney, age 62, has held the position of Senior
Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of
Applied since July 2005, with responsibility for global legal
affairs, intellectual property and security. From April 2002 to
July 2005, Mr. Sweeney was Group Vice President, Legal
Affairs and Intellectual Property, and Corporate Secretary.
Mr. Sweeney joined Applied in 1993. |
|
(8) |
|
Mr. Bowers, age 50, has been Group Vice President,
Corporate Initiatives since March 2008. From March 2008 to
September 2009, he was Group Vice President and General Manager
of Corporate Services and Chief of Staff, working closely with
executives on effective business strategy execution. Prior to
joining Applied, Mr. Bowers was a partner at the Hay Group,
where he held various business leadership and consulting
positions from 1992 to 2008. Most recently, he was Director of
Client Services in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, and a
member of the Hay Group Global R&D Council. |
|
(9) |
|
Mr. Kifer, age 59, joined Applied in May 2006 as Group
Vice President and Chief Information Officer, Global Information
Services. Prior to his appointment, Mr. Kifer spent five
years with DHL in various executive management roles, most
recently as the Senior Vice President and Chief Information
Officer for North America, Asia Pacific and Emerging Markets. |
|
(10) |
|
Ms. Humiston, age 45, was named Group Vice President,
Global Human Resources, in May 2010. Prior to that, she served
as the Corporate Vice President of Human Resources for both the
Energy and Environmental Solutions and Display groups. Prior to
joining Applied, Ms. Humiston was Vice President of Human
Resources at Honeywell International Inc. from October 2002 to
June 2008, with responsibility for various corporate and
international organizations. She previously held executive
positions with PeoplePC, Gap, Inc. and General Electric. |
|
(11) |
|
Mr. Pappis, age 50, has been Group Vice President and
General Manager of Applied Global Services since September 2009.
He previously held positions in Applied Global Services as
Corporate Vice President and General Manager for the
Semiconductor Service Solutions group and as general manager for
Equipment Productivity Services. He has held various other
management positions since joining Applied in 1986. |
|
(12) |
|
Mr. Timko, age 42, joined Applied in March 2010 as
Corporate Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer. From June 2006 until March 2010,
Mr. Timko was with Delphi Automotive LLP, where he was most
recently Chief Accounting Officer and Controller. He served as
Assistant Controller for The Interpublic Group of Companies,
Inc. from December 2004 to June 2006, and previously at Dover
Corporation. Mr. Timko began his career in 1991 with
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC and is a certified public accountant. |
Available
Information
Applieds website is
http://www.appliedmaterials.com.
Applied makes available free of charge, on or through its
website, its annual, quarterly and current reports, and any
amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable
after electronically filing such reports with, or furnishing
them to, the SEC. This website address is intended to be an
inactive textual reference only. None of the information on
Applieds website is part of this
Form 10-K
or is incorporated by reference herein.
14
The following factors could materially affect Applieds
business, financial condition or results of operations and
should be carefully considered in evaluating the Company and its
business, in addition to other information presented elsewhere
in this report.
The
industries that Applied serves are volatile and difficult to
predict.
As a supplier to the global semiconductor, flat panel display,
solar and related industries, Applied is subject to business
cycles, the timing, length and volatility of which can be
difficult to predict and which vary by reportable segment. These
industries historically have been cyclical due to sudden changes
in customers manufacturing capacity and advanced
technology requirements and spending, which depend in part on
customers capacity utilization, production volumes,
end-use demand, and inventory levels relative to demand, as well
as the rate of technology transitions and customers access
to affordable capital. These changes have affected the timing
and amounts of customers purchases and investments in
technology, and continue to affect Applieds orders, net
sales, operating expenses and net income.
To meet rapidly changing demand in the industries it serves,
Applied must accurately forecast demand and effectively manage
its resources and production capacity for each of its segments
as well as across multiple segments. During periods of
increasing demand for its products, Applied must have sufficient
manufacturing capacity and inventory to meet customer demand;
effectively manage its supply chain; attract, retain and
motivate a sufficient number of qualified employees; and
continue to control costs. During periods of decreasing demand,
Applied must reduce costs and align its cost structure with
prevailing market conditions; effectively manage its supply
chain; and motivate and retain key employees. If Applied does
not accurately forecast and timely and appropriately adapt to
changes in its business environment, Applieds business,
financial condition and results of operations may be materially
and adversely affected.
Applied
is exposed to risks associated with the difficult financial
markets and uncertain global economy.
The tightening of the credit markets, disruption in the
financial markets, and global economic recession that began in
2008 contributed to significant slowdowns in the industries in
which Applied operates. Although economic and market conditions
have improved, continuing difficulties in the financial markets
and uncertainty regarding the global economic recovery are
posing challenges. The markets for semiconductors and flat panel
displays in particular depend largely on consumer spending.
Economic uncertainty exacerbates negative trends in consumer
spending and may cause certain Applied customers to push out,
cancel, or refrain from placing orders for equipment or
services, which may reduce net sales, reduce backlog, and affect
Applieds ability to convert backlog to sales. Difficulties
in obtaining capital, uncertain market conditions, or reduced
profitability may also cause some customers to scale back
operations, exit businesses, merge with other manufacturers, or
file for bankruptcy protection and potentially cease operations,
leading to customers reduced research and development
funding
and/or
capital expenditures and, in turn, lower sales
and/or
additional inventory or bad debt expense for Applied. These
conditions may also similarly affect key suppliers, which could
impair their ability to deliver parts and result in delays for
Applieds products or added costs. In addition, these
conditions may lead to strategic alliances by, or consolidation
of, other equipment manufacturers, which could adversely affect
Applieds ability to compete effectively.
Uncertainty about future economic and industry conditions also
makes it more challenging for Applied to forecast its operating
results, make business decisions, and identify the risks that
may affect its business, sources and uses of cash, financial
condition and results of operations. Applied may be required to
implement additional cost reduction efforts, including
restructuring activities,
and/or
modify its business model, which may adversely affect
Applieds ability to capitalize on opportunities in a
market recovery. In addition, Applied maintains an investment
portfolio that is subject to general credit, liquidity, foreign
exchange, market and interest rate risks. The risks to
Applieds investment portfolio may be exacerbated if
financial market conditions deteriorate and, as a result, the
value and liquidity of the investment portfolio and return on
pension assets could be negatively impacted and lead to
impairment charges. If Applied does not timely and appropriately
adapt to changes resulting from the uncertain
15
macroeconomic environment and industry conditions,
Applieds business, financial condition or results of
operations may be materially and adversely affected.
Applied
is exposed to risks as a result of ongoing changes in the
various industries in which it operates.
The global semiconductor, flat panel display, solar and related
industries in which Applied operates are characterized by
ongoing changes affecting some or all of these industries,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
increasing capital requirements for building and operating new
fabrication plants and customers ability to raise the
necessary capital, particularly in a difficult financial market;
|
|
|
|
differences in growth rates among the semiconductor, display and
solar industries;
|
|
|
|
the increasing importance of establishing, improving and
maintaining strong relationships with customers;
|
|
|
|
abrupt and unforeseen shifts in the nature and amount of
customer and end-user demand;
|
|
|
|
the increasing cost and complexity for customers to move from
product design to volume manufacturing, which may slow the
adoption rate for new manufacturing technology;
|
|
|
|
the need to reduce the total cost of manufacturing system
ownership, due in part to greater demand for lower-cost consumer
electronics as compared to business information technology
spending;
|
|
|
|
the heightened importance to customers of system reliability and
productivity and the effect on demand for fabrication systems as
a result of their increasing productivity, device yield and
reliability;
|
|
|
|
the increasing importance of, and difficulties in, developing
products with sufficient differentiation to influence
customers purchasing decisions;
|
|
|
|
requirements for shorter cycle times for the development,
manufacture and installation of manufacturing equipment;
|
|
|
|
price and performance trends for semiconductor devices, LCDs and
solar PVs, and the corresponding effect on demand for such
products;
|
|
|
|
the increasing importance of the availability of spare parts to
maximize the time that customers systems are available for
production;
|
|
|
|
the increasing role for and complexity of software in Applied
products; and
|
|
|
|
the increasing focus on reducing energy usage and improving the
environmental impact and sustainability associated with
manufacturing operations.
|
If Applied does not successfully manage the risks resulting from
the ongoing changes in the semiconductor, flat panel display,
solar and related industries, its business, financial condition
and results of operations could be materially and adversely
affected.
Applied
is exposed to risks as a result of ongoing changes specific to
the semiconductor industry.
The greatest portion of Applieds consolidated net sales
and profitability historically has been derived from sales of
manufacturing equipment by the Silicon Systems Group to the
global semiconductor industry. In addition, a majority of the
revenues of Applied Global Services is from sales of service
products to semiconductor manufacturers. The semiconductor
industry is characterized by ongoing changes particular to that
industry in addition to the general industry changes described
in the preceding risk factor, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the increasing cost of research and development due to many
factors, including: decreasing linewidths on a chip; the use of
new materials such as cobalt and yttrium; new and more complex
device structures; more applications and process steps;
increasing chip design costs; and the increasing cost and
complexity of integrated manufacturing processes;
|
|
|
|
the growing number of types and varieties of semiconductors and
number of applications across multiple substrate sizes;
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
differing market growth rates and capital requirements for
different applications, such as NAND Flash, DRAM, logic and
foundry, and the resulting effect on customers spending
patterns and on Applieds ability to compete in these
market segments;
|
|
|
|
the increasing cost and complexity for semiconductor
manufacturers to move more technically advanced capability and
smaller linewidths to volume manufacturing, and the resulting
impact on the rates of technology transition and investment in
capital equipment;
|
|
|
|
semiconductor manufacturers increasing adoption of more
productive 300mm systems in relation to 200mm system capacity,
and the resulting effect on demand for manufacturing equipment
and services;
|
|
|
|
the decreasing rate of capital expenditures as a percentage of
semiconductor manufacturers revenue;
|
|
|
|
shorter cycle times between customers order placement and
product shipment, which may lead to inventory write-offs and
manufacturing inefficiencies that decrease gross margin;
|
|
|
|
technology developments in related markets, such as lithography,
to which Applied may need to adapt;
|
|
|
|
competitive factors that make it difficult to enhance market
position;
|
|
|
|
the importance of growing market positions in larger market
segments, such as etch and inspection;
|
|
|
|
the increasing concentration of wafer starts in one country,
Korea, where Applieds service penetration and
service-revenue-per-wafer-start have been lower than in other
regions;
|
|
|
|
the increasing fragmentation of semiconductor markets, leading
certain markets to become too small to support the cost of a new
fabrication plant, while others require less technologically
advanced products; and
|
|
|
|
the cost, technical complexity and timing of a proposed
transition from 300mm to 450mm wafers.
|
If Applied does not successfully manage the risks resulting from
the ongoing changes occurring in the semiconductor industry, its
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
Applied
is exposed to risks as a result of ongoing changes specific to
the flat panel display industry.
The global flat panel display industry historically has
experienced considerable volatility in capital equipment
investment levels, due in part to the limited number of LCD
manufacturers and the concentrated nature of LCD end-use
applications. Recently, industry growth has depended to a
considerable extent on consumer demand for increasingly larger
and more advanced TVs. In addition to the general industry
changes described above in the third risk factor, the display
industry is characterized by ongoing changes particular to that
industry, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the planned expansion of manufacturing facilities in China by
Chinese display manufacturers as well as manufacturers from
other countries, and the ability of non-Chinese manufacturers to
obtain government approvals;
|
|
|
|
technical and financial difficulties associated with
transitioning to larger substrate sizes for LCDs;
|
|
|
|
the effect of a slowing rate of transition to larger substrate
sizes on capital intensity and product differentiation;
|
|
|
|
technical difficulties and costs associated with developing new
technologies for use in LCD manufacturing, such as LEDs for
backlighting;
|
|
|
|
new energy efficiency standards for large-screen LCD
TVs; and
|
|
|
|
uncertainty with respect to future LCD technology end-use
applications and growth drivers.
|
If Applied does not successfully manage the risks resulting from
the ongoing changes occurring in the display industry, its
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
17
Applied
is exposed to risks as a result of ongoing changes specific to
the solar industry.
Applied anticipates that an increasing portion of its business
will be in the emerging solar market, which, in addition to the
general industry changes described above in the third risk
factor, is characterized by ongoing changes specific to the
solar industry, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the need to continually decrease the
cost-per-watt
of electricity produced by solar PV products by, among other
things, reducing operating costs and increasing throughputs for
solar PV manufacturing, and improving the conversion efficiency
of solar PVs;
|
|
|
|
the impact on demand for solar PV products arising from the cost
of electricity generated by solar PVs compared to the cost of
electricity from the existing grid or other energy sources;
|
|
|
|
the varying energy policies of governments around the world and
their effect in influencing the rate of growth of the solar PV
market, including the availability and amount of government
incentives for solar power such as tax credits, feed-in tariffs,
rebates, renewable portfolio standards that require electricity
providers to sell a targeted amount of energy from renewable
sources, and goals for solar installations on government
facilities;
|
|
|
|
the cost of polysilicon and other materials;
|
|
|
|
changes in the nature and amount of end demand for solar PVs
that may adversely impact the sales growth rates and
profitability of Applieds products;
|
|
|
|
varying levels of infrastructure investment for smart
grid technologies to modernize and enhance the
transmission, distribution and use of electricity, which link
distributed solar PV sources to population centers, increase
transmission capability, and optimize power usage;
|
|
|
|
access to affordable financing and capital by customers and
end-users; and
|
|
|
|
the growing number of solar PV manufacturers and increasing
global production capacity for solar PVs, primarily in China as
a result of increased solar subsidies and lower manufacturing
costs, which may lead to oversupply.
|
If Applied does not successfully manage the risks resulting from
the ongoing changes occurring in the solar industry, its
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
Applied
must adapt its business and product offerings to respond to
competition and rapid technological changes.
As Applied operates in a highly competitive environment, its
future success depends on many factors, including the effective
commercialization and customer acceptance of its equipment,
services and related products. In addition, Applied must
successfully execute its growth strategy, including enhancing
market share in existing markets, expanding into related
markets, cultivating new markets and exceeding industry growth
rates, while constantly improving its operational performance.
The development, introduction and support of a broadening set of
products in more varied competitive environments have grown
increasingly complex and expensive over time. Furthermore, new
or improved products may entail higher costs and reduced
profits. Applieds performance may be adversely affected if
it does not timely, cost-effectively and successfully:
|
|
|
|
|
develop new products, improve
and/or
develop new applications for existing products, and adapt
similar products for use by customers in different applications
and/or
markets with varying technical requirements;
|
|
|
|
appropriately price and achieve market acceptance of products;
|
|
|
|
differentiate its products from those of competitors and any
disruptive technologies, meet performance specifications, and
drive efficiencies and cost reductions;
|
|
|
|
maintain operating flexibility to enable different responses to
different markets, customers and applications;
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
allocate resources, including people and R&D funding, among
Applieds products and between the development of new
products and the enhancement of existing products, as most
appropriate and effective for future growth;
|
|
|
|
reduce the cost of, and improve the productivity of capital
invested in, R&D activities;
|
|
|
|
accurately forecast demand, work with suppliers and meet
production schedules for its products;
|
|
|
|
improve its manufacturing processes and achieve cost
efficiencies across product offerings;
|
|
|
|
adapt to changes in value offered by companies in different
parts of the supply chain;
|
|
|
|
qualify products for volume manufacturing with its
customers; and
|
|
|
|
implement changes in its design engineering methodology,
including those that enable reduction of material costs and
cycle time, greater commonality of platforms and types of parts
used in different systems, greater effectiveness of product life
cycle management, and reduced energy usage and environmental
impact.
|
If Applied does not successfully manage these challenges, its
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
Operating
in multiple industries, and the entry into new markets and
industries, entail additional challenges.
As part of its growth strategy, Applied must successfully expand
into related or new markets and industries, either with its
existing products or with new products developed internally or
obtained through acquisitions. The entry into different markets
involves additional challenges, including those arising from:
|
|
|
|
|
the need to devote additional resources to develop new products
for, and operate in, new markets;
|
|
|
|
differing rates of profitability and growth among multiple
businesses;
|
|
|
|
Applieds ability to anticipate demand, capitalize on
opportunities, and avoid or minimize risks;
|
|
|
|
the complexity of managing multiple businesses with variations
in production planning, execution, supply chain management and
logistics;
|
|
|
|
the adoption of new business models;
|
|
|
|
the need to undertake activities to grow demand for end-products;
|
|
|
|
the need to develop adequate new business processes and systems;
|
|
|
|
Applieds ability to rapidly expand its operations to meet
increased demand and the associated effect on working capital;
|
|
|
|
new materials, processes and technologies;
|
|
|
|
the need to attract, motivate and retain employees with skills
and expertise in these new areas;
|
|
|
|
new and more diverse customers and suppliers, including some
with limited operating histories, uncertain
and/or
limited funding, evolving business models
and/or
locations in regions where Applied does not have existing
operations;
|
|
|
|
different customer service requirements;
|
|
|
|
new or different competitors with potentially more financial or
other resources, industry experience
and/or
established customer relationships;
|
|
|
|
entry into new industries and countries, with differing levels
of government involvement, laws and regulations, and business,
employment and safety practices;
|
|
|
|
third parties intellectual property rights; and
|
|
|
|
the need to comply with, or work to establish, industry
standards and practices.
|
19
In addition, Applied has begun applying for and receiving
funding from United States and other government agencies for
certain strategic development programs to increase its R&D
resources and address new market opportunities. As a condition
to this government funding, Applied may be subject to certain
record-keeping, audit, intellectual property rights-sharing
and/or other
obligations.
If Applied does not successfully manage the risks resulting from
its diversification and entry into new markets and industries,
its business, financial condition and results of operations
could be materially and adversely affected.
Applied
is exposed to the risks of operating a global
business.
In fiscal 2010, approximately 88 percent of Applieds
net sales were to customers in regions outside the
United States. Certain of Applieds R&D and
manufacturing facilities, as well as suppliers to Applied, are
also located outside the United States, including in Singapore,
Taiwan, China, Korea, Israel, Italy and Switzerland. Applied is
also expanding its business and operations in new countries. The
global nature of Applieds business and operations presents
challenges, including but not limited to those arising from:
|
|
|
|
|
varying regional and geopolitical business conditions and
demands;
|
|
|
|
political and social attitudes, laws, rules, regulations and
policies within countries that favor domestic companies over
non-domestic companies, including customer- or
government-supported efforts to promote the development and
growth of local competitors;
|
|
|
|
variations among, and changes in, local, regional, national or
international laws and regulations (including intellectual
property, labor, tax, and import /export laws), as well as the
interpretation and application of such laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
global trade issues, including those related to the
interpretation and application of import and export licenses;
|
|
|
|
positions taken by governmental agencies regarding possible
national commercial
and/or
security issues posed by international business operations;
|
|
|
|
fluctuating raw material, commodity and energy costs;
|
|
|
|
challenges associated with managing more geographically diverse
operations and projects ;
|
|
|
|
varying customs, practices and expectations of workers in
different regions;
|
|
|
|
variations in the ability to develop relationships with local
customers, suppliers and governments;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in interest rates and currency exchange rates,
including the relative strength or weakness of the
U.S. dollar and the euro;
|
|
|
|
the need to provide sufficient levels of technical support in
different locations;
|
|
|
|
political instability, natural disasters (such as earthquakes,
floods or storms), pandemics, terrorism or acts of war in
locations where Applied has operations, suppliers or sales;
|
|
|
|
cultural and language differences;
|
|
|
|
shipping costs
and/or
delays;
|
|
|
|
the need to continually improve the Companys operating
cost structure;
|
|
|
|
difficulties and uncertainties associated with the entry into
new countries;
|
|
|
|
uncertainties with respect to economic growth rates in various
countries; and
|
|
|
|
uncertainties with respect to growth rates for the manufacture
and sales of semiconductors, LCDs and solar PVs in the
developing economies of certain countries.
|
Many of these challenges are present in China and Korea, which
are experiencing significant growth of both suppliers and
competitors to Applied. Applied further believes that China and
Korea present large potential markets
20
for its products and opportunity for growth over the long term,
although at lower projected levels of profitability and margins
for certain products than historically have been achieved in
other regions. In addition, Applied must regularly reassess the
size, capability and location of its global infrastructure and
make appropriate changes, and must have effective change
management processes and procedures to address changes in its
business and operations. These challenges may materially and
adversely affect Applieds business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Applied
is exposed to risks associated with a highly concentrated
customer base.
Applieds semiconductor and flat panel display customer
bases historically have been, and are becoming even more, highly
concentrated as a result of economic and industry conditions.
For example, in fiscal 2010, four semiconductor manufacturers
accounted for 51 percent of Silicon Systems Group net
sales, and five LCD manufacturers accounted for 71 percent
of Display net sales.Certain customers have experienced
significant ownership or management changes, consolidated with
other manufacturers, outsourced manufacturing activities, or
engaged in collaboration or cooperation arrangements with other
manufacturers. In addition, customers have entered into
strategic alliances or industry consortia that have increased
the influence of key industry participants in technology
decisions made by their partners. Also, certain semiconductor
and display customers are making an increasingly greater
percentage of their respective industrys capital equipment
investments.
In this environment, contracts or orders from a relatively
limited number of semiconductor and display manufacturers have
accounted for, and are expected to continue to account for, a
substantial portion of Applieds business, which may result
in added complexities in managing customer relationships and
transactions. In addition, the mix and type of customers, and
sales to any single customer, may vary significantly from
quarter to quarter and from year to year. If customers do not
place orders, or they substantially reduce, delay or cancel
orders, Applied may not be able to replace the business. As
Applieds products are configured to customer
specifications, changing, rescheduling or canceling orders may
result in significant, non-recoverable costs. Major customers
may also seek, and on occasion receive, pricing, payment,
intellectual property-related, or other commercial terms that
are less favorable to Applied. These factors could have a
material adverse effect on Applieds business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Manufacturing
interruptions or delays could affect Applieds ability to
meet customer demand and lead to higher costs, while the failure
to estimate customer demand accurately could result in excess or
obsolete inventory.
Applieds business depends on its timely supply of
equipment, services and related products that meet the rapidly
changing technical and volume requirements of its customers,
which depends in part on the timely delivery of parts,
components and subassemblies (collectively, parts) from
suppliers and timely performance by contract manufacturers. Some
key parts may be subject to long lead-times
and/or
obtainable only from a single supplier or limited group of
suppliers, and some sourcing or subassembly is provided by
suppliers located in countries other than the United States,
including China and Korea. Cyclical industry conditions and the
volatility of demand for manufacturing equipment increase
capital, technical, operational and other risks for companies
throughout Applieds supply chain. Further, the adverse
conditions in the credit and financial markets and industry
slowdowns in recent periods have caused, and may continue to
cause, some suppliers to scale back operations, exit businesses,
merge with other companies, or file for bankruptcy protection
and possibly cease operations, potentially affecting
Applieds ability to obtain quality parts on a timely
basis. Applied may experience significant interruptions of its
manufacturing operations, delays in its ability to deliver
products or services, increased costs or customer order
cancellations as a result of:
|
|
|
|
|
the failure or inability of suppliers to timely deliver
sufficient quantities of quality parts on a cost-effective basis;
|
|
|
|
volatility in the availability and cost of materials;
|
|
|
|
difficulties or delays in obtaining required import or export
approvals;
|
|
|
|
information technology or infrastructure failures;
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
natural disasters (such as earthquakes, floods or
storms); or
|
|
|
|
other causes (such as regional economic downturns, pandemics,
political instability, terrorism, or acts of war) that could
result in delayed deliveries, manufacturing inefficiencies,
increased costs or order cancellations.
|
In addition, Applieds need to rapidly increase its
business and manufacturing capacity to meet increases in demand
or expedited shipment schedules may exacerbate any interruptions
in Applieds manufacturing operations and supply chain and
the associated effect on Applieds working capital.
Moreover, if actual demand for Applieds products is
different than expected, Applied may purchase more/fewer parts
than necessary or incur costs for canceling, postponing or
expediting delivery of parts. If Applied purchases inventory in
anticipation of customer demand that does not materialize, or if
customers reduce or delay orders, Applied may incur excess
inventory charges. Any or all of these factors could materially
and adversely affect Applieds business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Applied
is exposed to risks associated with acquisitions and strategic
investments.
Applied has made, and in the future intends to make,
acquisitions of, and investments in, companies, technologies or
products in existing, related or new markets for Applied.
Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including but not limited
to:
|
|
|
|
|
diversion of managements attention from other operational
matters;
|
|
|
|
inability to complete acquisitions as anticipated or at all;
|
|
|
|
inability to realize anticipated benefits;
|
|
|
|
failure to commercialize purchased technologies;
|
|
|
|
inability to capitalize on characteristics of new markets that
may be significantly different from Applieds existing
markets and where competitors may have stronger market positions
and customer relationships;
|
|
|
|
failure to attract, retain and motivate key employees from the
acquired business;
|
|
|
|
exposure to new operational risks, rules, regulations, worker
expectations, customs and practices to the extent acquired
businesses are located in countries where Applied has not
historically conducted business;
|
|
|
|
challenges associated with managing new, more diverse and more
widespread operations, projects and people;
|
|
|
|
inability to obtain and protect intellectual property rights in
key technologies;
|
|
|
|
inadequacy or ineffectiveness of an acquired companys
internal financial controls, disclosure controls and procedures,
and/or
environmental, health & safety, human resource, or
other policies or practices;
|
|
|
|
impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill as a
result of changing business conditions, technological
advancements or
worse-than-expected
performance of the segment;
|
|
|
|
the risk of litigation or disputes with customers, suppliers,
partners or stockholders of an acquisition target arising from a
proposed or completed transaction;
|
|
|
|
unknown, underestimated
and/or
undisclosed commitments or liabilities;
|
|
|
|
inappropriate scale of acquired entities critical
resources or facilities for business needs; and
|
|
|
|
ineffective integration of operations, systems, technologies,
products or employees of an acquired business.
|
Applied also makes strategic investments in other companies,
including companies formed as joint ventures, which may decline
in value
and/or not
meet desired objectives. The success of these investments
depends on various factors over which Applied may have limited
or no control and, particularly with respect to joint ventures,
requires ongoing and effective cooperation with strategic
partners. The risks to Applieds strategic investment
portfolio may be exacerbated by unfavorable financial market and
macroeconomic conditions and, as a result, the value of the
22
investment portfolio could be negatively impacted and lead to
impairment charges. Mergers and acquisitions and strategic
investments are inherently subject to significant risks, and the
inability to effectively manage these risks could materially and
adversely affect Applieds business, financial condition
and results of operations. If Applied does not successfully
manage the risks associated with acquisitions and strategic
investments, its business, financial condition and results of
operations could be materially and adversely affected.
The
ability to attract, retain and motivate key employees is vital
to Applieds success.
Applieds success and competitiveness depend in large part
on its ability to attract, retain and motivate key employees.
Achieving this objective may be difficult due to many factors,
including fluctuations in global economic and industry
conditions, changes in Applieds management or leadership,
competitors hiring practices, cost reduction activities
(including workforce reductions), and the effectiveness of
Applieds compensation and benefit programs, including its
share-based programs. Applied periodically evaluates its overall
compensation program and makes adjustments, as appropriate, to
enhance its competitiveness. If Applied does not successfully
attract, retain and motivate key employees, Applied may be
unable to capitalize on its opportunities and its operating
results may be materially and adversely affected.
The
failure to successfully implement and conduct outsourcing
activities and other operational initiatives could adversely
affect results of operations.
To better align its costs with market conditions, locate closer
to customers, enhance productivity, and improve efficiencies,
Applied conducts engineering, software development,
manufacturing, sourcing and other operations in regions outside
the United States, including India, China, and Korea. Applied is
implementing a more distributed manufacturing model, which
includes transitioning certain manufacturing and supply chain
activities from the United States and Europe to Singapore,
Taiwan and other countries in Asia and completing assembly of
some systems at the customer site. In addition, Applied
outsources certain functions to third parties, including
companies in the United States, India, China, Korea and other
countries. Outsourced functions include contract manufacturing,
engineering, customer support, software development, information
technology support, finance and administrative activities. The
expanding role of third party providers has required changes to
Applieds existing operations and the adoption of new
procedures and processes for retaining and managing these
providers, as well as redistributing responsibilities as
warranted, in order to realize the potential productivity and
operational efficiencies, assure quality and continuity of
supply, and protect Applieds intellectual property. If
Applied does not accurately forecast the amount, timing and mix
of demand for products, or if contract manufacturers or other
outsource providers fail to perform in a timely manner or at
satisfactory quality levels, Applieds ability to meet
customer requirements could suffer, particularly during a market
upturn.
In addition, Applied is implementing a comprehensive program to
better align its global organizations and processes, including
initiatives to enhance the Asia supply chain, integrate its
sales teams into the business units, and improve back office and
information technology infrastructure for more efficient
transaction processing. Applied also is implementing a
multi-year, company-wide program to transform certain business
processes, including the transition to a single enterprise
resource planning (ERP) software system to perform various
functions. The implementation of additional functionality to the
ERP system entails certain risks, including difficulties with
changes in business processes that could disrupt Applieds
operations, such as its ability to track orders and timely ship
products, project inventory requirements, manage its supply
chain and aggregate financial and operational data. The
implementation of new initiatives may not achieve the
anticipated benefits and may divert managements attention
from other operational activities, negatively affect employee
morale, or have other unintended consequences.
If Applied does not effectively develop and implement its
outsourcing and relocation strategies, if required export and
other governmental approvals are not timely obtained, if
Applieds third party providers do not perform as
anticipated, or if there are delays or difficulties in enhancing
business processes, Applied may not realize anticipated
productivity improvements or cost efficiencies, and may
experience operational difficulties, increased costs (including
energy and transportation), manufacturing interruptions or
delays, inefficiencies in the structure
and/or
operation of its supply chain, loss of its intellectual property
rights, quality issues, increased product
23
time-to-market,
and/or
inefficient allocation of human resources, any or all of which
could materially and adversely affect Applieds business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Applied
may incur impairment charges to goodwill or long-lived
assets.
Applied has a significant amount of goodwill and other acquired
intangible assets related to acquisitions. Goodwill and
purchased intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not
amortized, but are reviewed for impairment annually during the
fourth quarter of each fiscal year, and more frequently when
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
value of an asset may not be recoverable. The review compares
the fair value for each of Applieds reporting units to its
associated carrying value, including goodwill. Factors that
could lead to impairment of goodwill and intangible assets
include adverse industry or economic trends, reduced estimates
of future cash flows, declines in the market price of Applied
common stock, changes in the Companys strategies or
product portfolio, and restructuring activities. Applieds
valuation methodology for assessing impairment requires
management to make judgments and assumptions based on historical
experience and projections of future operating performance.
Applied may be required to record a charge to earnings during
the period in which an impairment of goodwill or amortizable
intangible assets is determined to exist, which could materially
and adversely affect Applieds results of operations.
Applied
is exposed to various risks related to legal proceedings or
claims and protection of intellectual property
rights.
Applied from time to time is, and in the future may be, involved
in legal proceedings or claims regarding patent infringement,
intellectual property rights, antitrust, environmental
regulations, securities, contracts, product performance, product
liability, unfair competition, misappropriation of trade
secrets, employment, workplace safety, and other matters.
Applied also on occasion receives notification from customers
who believe that Applied owes them indemnification or other
obligations related to claims made against such customers by
third parties.
In February 2010, the Seoul Prosecutors Office for the
Eastern District in Korea indicted certain employees of Applied
Materials Korea (AMK), including the former head of AMK who at
the time of indictment was a vice president of Applied
Materials, Inc., along with employees of several other
companies, alleging the improper receipt and use of the
confidential information of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
(Samsung), a major customer. Hearings on these matters are
ongoing in the Seoul Eastern District Court.. Applied and
Samsung entered into a settlement agreement effective as of
November 1, 2010, which resolves potential civil claims
related to this matter and which is separate from and does not
affect the criminal proceedings.
Legal proceedings and claims, whether with or without merit, and
associated internal investigations, may (1) be
time-consuming and expensive to prosecute, defend or conduct;
(2) divert managements attention and other Applied
resources; (3) inhibit Applieds ability to sell its
products; (4) result in adverse judgments for damages,
injunctive relief, penalties and fines;
and/or
(5) negatively affect Applieds business. There can be
no assurance regarding the outcome of current or future legal
proceedings, claims or investigations. If Applied is not able to
favorably resolve or settle legal proceedings or claims, or in
the event of any adverse findings against Applied or any of its
employees, Applieds business, financial condition and
results of operations could be materially and adversely affected
and Applied may suffer harm to its reputation.
Applieds success depends in significant part on the
protection of its intellectual property and other rights.
Infringement of Applieds rights by a third party, such as
the unauthorized manufacture or sale of equipment or spare
parts, could result in uncompensated lost market and revenue
opportunities for Applied. Applieds intellectual property
rights may not provide significant competitive advantages if
they are circumvented, invalidated, rendered obsolete by the
rapid pace of technological change, or if Applied does not
adequately protect or assert these rights. Furthermore, the laws
and practices of other countries, including China, India, Taiwan
and Korea, permit the protection and enforcement of
Applieds rights to varying extents, which may not be
sufficient to protect Applieds rights. Applied previously
entered into an arrangement with one of its competitors to
decrease the risk of patent infringement lawsuits in the future.
There can be no assurance that the intended results of this
arrangement will be achieved or that Applied will be able to
adequately protect its intellectual property rights with the
restrictions associated with the arrangement. If Applied is not
able to favorably resolve or settle claims, obtain or enforce
24
intellectual property rights, obtain necessary licenses on
commercially reasonable terms,
and/or
successfully prosecute or defend its intellectual property
position, Applieds business, financial condition and
results of operations could be materially and adversely affected
and Applied may suffer harm to its reputation. See Note 18
of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Changes
in tax rates or tax assets and liabilities could affect results
of operations.
As a global company, Applied is subject to taxation in the
United States and various other countries. Significant judgment
is required to determine and estimate worldwide tax liabilities.
Applieds future annual and quarterly tax rates could be
affected by numerous factors, including changes in the:
(1) applicable tax laws; (2) amount and composition of
pre-tax income in countries with differing tax rates; or
(3) valuation of Applieds deferred tax assets and
liabilities.
To better align with the increasingly international nature of
its business, Applied is transitioning certain manufacturing,
supply chain, and other operations into Asia, bringing these
activities closer to customers. These changes are expected to
result in a reduction of future operating costs. In Singapore,
Applied is pursuing available tax incentives that provide that
certain income earned in Singapore would be subject to tax
holidays or reduced income tax rates. To obtain these tax
benefits, Applied must meet requirements relating to various
activities. Applied is engaged in discussions with tax
authorities in Singapore and the United States concerning these
incentives. Applieds ability to realize benefits from
these initiatives could be materially affected if, among other
things, applicable requirements are not met, the incentives are
substantially modified, or if Applied incurs net losses for
which it cannot claim a deduction.
In addition, Applied is subject to regular examination by the
Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities, and from
time to time initiates amendments to previously filed tax
returns. Applied regularly assesses the likelihood of favorable
or unfavorable outcomes resulting from these examinations and
amendments to determine the adequacy of its provision for income
taxes, which requires estimates and judgments. Although Applied
believes its tax estimates are reasonable, there can be no
assurance that the tax authorities will agree with such
estimates. Applied may have to engage in litigation to achieve
the results reflected in the estimates, which may be
time-consuming and expensive. There can be no assurance that
Applied will be successful or that any final determination will
not be materially different from the treatment reflected in
Applieds historical income tax provisions and accruals,
which could materially and adversely affect Applieds
financial condition and results of operations.
Applied
is subject to risks of non-compliance with environmental and
safety regulations.
Applied is subject to environmental and safety regulations in
connection with its global business operations, including but
not limited to: regulations related to the development,
manufacture and use of its products; recycling and disposal of
materials used in its products or in producing its products; the
operation of its facilities; and the use of its real property.
The failure or inability to comply with existing or future
environmental and safety regulations, such as those related to
climate change, could result in: (1) significant
remediation liabilities; (2) the imposition of fines;
(3) the suspension or termination of the development,
manufacture, sale or use of certain of its products;
(4) limitations on the operation of its facilities or
ability to use its real property;
and/or
(5) a decrease in the value of its real property, each of
which could have a material adverse effect on Applieds
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Applied
is exposed to various risks related to the regulatory
environment.
Applied is subject to various risks related to: (1) new,
different, inconsistent or even conflicting laws, rules and
regulations that may be enacted by legislative bodies
and/or
regulatory agencies in the countries in which Applied operates;
(2) disagreements or disputes between national or regional
regulatory agencies related to international trade; and
(3) the interpretation and application of laws, rules and
regulations. For example, as a public company with global
operations, Applied is subject to the laws of multiple
jurisdictions and the rules and regulations of various governing
bodies, including those related to financial and other
disclosures, corporate governance, privacy, and anti-corruption.
Changes in laws, regulations and standards may create
uncertainty regarding compliance matters. Efforts to comply with
new and changing regulations have resulted in, and are likely to
continue to result in, increased general and administrative
expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from
revenue-
25
generating activities to compliance activities. If Applied is
found by a court or regulatory agency not to be in compliance
with applicable laws, rules or regulations, Applied could be
subject to legal or regulatory sanctions, the publics
perception of Applied could decline, and Applieds
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
|
|
Item 1B:
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
Information concerning Applieds principal properties at
October 31, 2010 is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Type
|
|
Principal Use
|
|
Footage
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Santa Clara, CA
|
|
Office, Plant & Warehouse
|
|
Headquarters; Marketing;
|
|
|
1,640,000
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing; Distribution;
|
|
|
420,000
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
|
|
Research, Development and Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Austin, TX
|
|
Office, Plant & Warehouse
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
1,458,000
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,000
|
|
|
Leased
|
Rehovot, Israel
|
|
Office, Plant & Warehouse
|
|
Manufacturing; Research, Development and Engineering
|
|
|
442,000
|
|
|
Owned
|
Alzenau, Germany
|
|
Office, Plant & Warehouse
|
|
Manufacturing; Research, Development and Engineering
|
|
|
255,000
|
|
|
Leased
|
Kalispell, MT
|
|
Office, Plant & Warehouse
|
|
Manufacturing; Research, Development and Engineering
|
|
|
252,000
|
|
|
Owned
|
Cheseaux, Switzerland
|
|
Office, Plant & Warehouse
|
|
Manufacturing; Research, Development, Engineering; Customer
Support
|
|
|
163,000
|
|
|
Leased
|
Treviso, Italy
|
|
Office, Plant & Warehouse
|
|
Manufacturing; Research, Development, Engineering; Customer
Support
|
|
|
89,000
|
|
|
Leased
|
Singapore
|
|
Office, Plant & Warehouse
|
|
Manufacturing and Customer Support
|
|
|
392,000
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
Leased
|
Tainan, Taiwan
|
|
Office, Plant & Warehouse
|
|
Manufacturing and Customer Support
|
|
|
320,000
|
|
|
Owned
|
Xian, China
|
|
Office, Plant & Warehouse
|
|
Research, Development and Engineering
|
|
|
486,000
|
|
|
Owned
|
Hsinchu, Taiwan
|
|
Office & Warehouse
|
|
Customer Support
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
Leased
|
Shanghai, China
|
|
Office & Warehouse
|
|
Customer Support
|
|
|
95,000
|
|
|
Leased
|
Because of the interrelation of Applieds operations,
properties within a country may be shared by the segments
operating within that country. Products in the Silicon Systems
Group are manufactured in Austin, Texas, Rehovot, Israel; and
Singapore. Remanufactured products in the Applied Global
Services segment are produced primarily in Austin, Texas and
Korea. Products in the Display segment are manufactured in
Santa Clara, California; Alzenau, Germany; and Tainan,
Taiwan. Products in the Energy and Environmental Solutions
segment are primarily manufactured in Alzenau, Germany;
Cheseaux, Switzerland; Treviso, Italy; and Santa Clara,
California.
26
In addition to the above properties, Applied leases office space
for marketing, sales, engineering and customer support offices
in 80 locations throughout the world: 19 in Europe, 18 in Japan,
17 in North America (principally the United States), 9 in China,
8 in Korea, 7 in Southeast Asia, and 2 in Taiwan. Applied has a
manufacturing facility of 261,000 square feet in Austin,
Texas available for sale.
In addition, Applied owns 112 acres of buildable land in
Texas that could accommodate approximately 1,708,000 square
feet of additional building space, and 43 acres in
California that could accommodate approximately
1,247,000 square feet of additional building space. Applied
also leases: 4 acres in Italy that could accommodate
approximately 180,000 square feet of additional building
space and 10 acres in Israel that could accommodate
approximately 111,000 square feet of additional building
space.
Applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as
adequate to meet its current and future requirements. Applied
regularly assesses the size, capability and location of its
global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based
on these assessments.
|
|
Item 3:
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
The information set forth under Legal Matters in
Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 4:
|
(Removed
and Reserved)
|
27
PART II
|
|
Item 5:
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Market
Information
The following table sets forth the high and low closing sale
prices for the periods presented as reported on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Range
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
13.31
|
|
|
$
|
8.14
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
11.92
|
|
|
$
|
8.34
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
13.49
|
|
|
$
|
10.50
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
14.01
|
|
|
$
|
12.66
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
14.87
|
|
|
$
|
11.89
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
14.47
|
|
|
$
|
11.80
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
14.00
|
|
|
$
|
11.78
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
12.35
|
|
|
$
|
10.37
|
|
Applieds common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global
Select Market under the symbol AMAT. As of November 19,
2010, there were 4,407 registered holders of Applied common
stock.
28
Performance
Graph
The performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total
stockholder return on Applied common stock during the period
from October 30, 2005 through October 31, 2010. This
is compared with the cumulative total return of the
Standard & Poors 500 Stock Index and the RDG
Semiconductor Composite Index over the same period. The
comparison assumes $100 was invested on October 30, 2005 in
Applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and
assumes reinvestment of dividends, if any. Dollar amounts in the
graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar. The performance
shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be
considered an indication of future performance.
Comparison
of 5 Year Cumulative Total Return*
Among
Applied Materials, Inc., The S&P 500 Index
And The RDG Semiconductor Composite Index
|
|
|
*
|
|
$100 invested on 10/30/05 in stock
or 10/31/05 in index, including reinvestment of dividends.
Indexes calculated on month-end basis.
Copyright©
2010 S&P, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All
rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/30/05
|
|
|
10/29/06
|
|
|
10/28/07
|
|
|
10/26/08
|
|
|
10/25/09
|
|
|
10/31/10
|
|
|
Applied Materials
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
106.47
|
|
|
|
117.66
|
|
|
|
72.04
|
|
|
|
83.61
|
|
|
|
81.46
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
116.34
|
|
|
|
133.28
|
|
|
|
85.17
|
|
|
|
93.52
|
|
|
|
108.97
|
|
RDG Semiconductor Composite Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
103.56
|
|
|
|
120.77
|
|
|
|
66.98
|
|
|
|
82.42
|
|
|
|
101.07
|
|
Dividends
During fiscal 2010, Applieds Board of Directors declared
three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $0.07 per share
and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $0.06 per
share. The fourth quarterly cash dividend of $0.07 per share
declared in fiscal 2010 will be paid on December 15, 2010
to stockholders of record as of November 24, 2010. During
fiscal 2009, Applieds Board of Directors declared four
quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $0.06 per share each.
Dividends declared during fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 amounted to
$361 million, $320 million and $323 million,
respectively. Applied currently anticipates that it will
continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the
future, although the declaration and amount of any future cash
dividend are at the discretion of the Board of Directors and
will depend on Applieds financial condition, results of
operations, capital requirements, business conditions and other
factors, as well as a determination that cash dividends are in
the best interests of Applieds stockholders.
29
Repurchases
of Applied Common Stock
The following table provides information as of October 31,
2010 with respect to the shares of common stock repurchased by
Applied during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Value of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
That May Yet be
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Purchased Under
|
|
Period
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Announced Program*
|
|
|
the Program*
|
|
|
|
(Shares in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Shares in thousands)
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Month #1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(August 2, 2010 to August 29, 2010)
|
|
|
2,114
|
|
|
$
|
10.97
|
|
|
|
2,114
|
|
|
$
|
1,777
|
|
Month #2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(August 30, 2010 to September 26, 2010)
|
|
|
5,472
|
|
|
$
|
10.92
|
|
|
|
5,472
|
|
|
$
|
1,717
|
|
Month #3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(September 27, 2010 to October 31, 2010)
|
|
|
5,679
|
|
|
$
|
11.81
|
|
|
|
5,679
|
|
|
$
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
13,265
|
|
|
$
|
11.31
|
|
|
|
13,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
On March 8, 2010, the Board of Directors approved a stock
repurchase program for up to $2.0 billion in repurchases
over the next three years, ending March 2013. |
30
|
|
Item 6:
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The following selected financial information has been derived
from Applieds historical audited consolidated financial
statements and should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes for
the corresponding fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year(1)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages, ratios, per share amounts
and number of employees)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
9,549
|
|
|
$
|
5,014
|
|
|
$
|
8,129
|
|
|
$
|
9,735
|
|
|
$
|
9,167
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
3,715
|
|
|
$
|
1,431
|
|
|
$
|
3,443
|
|
|
$
|
4,492
|
|
|
$
|
4,292
|
|
(% of net sales)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Research, development and engineering
|
|
$
|
1,144
|
|
|
$
|
934
|
|
|
$
|
1,104
|
|
|
$
|
1,142
|
|
|
$
|
1,152
|
|
(% of net sales)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Marketing, selling, general and administrative
|
|
$
|
942
|
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
965
|
|
|
$
|
952
|
|
|
$
|
907
|
|
(% of net sales)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,384
|
|
|
$
|
(394
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,355
|
|
|
$
|
2,372
|
|
|
$
|
2,021
|
|
(% of net sales)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
1,387
|
|
|
$
|
(486
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,409
|
|
|
$
|
2,440
|
|
|
$
|
2,167
|
|
Effective tax rate(%)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
938
|
|
|
$
|
(305
|
)
|
|
$
|
961
|
|
|
$
|
1,710
|
|
|
$
|
1,517
|
|
(% of net sales)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Earnings (loss) per diluted share
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
Weighted average common shares
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
|
|
1,333
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
|
|
1,565
|
|
New orders
|
|
$
|
10,249
|
|
|
$
|
4,097
|
|
|
$
|
9,155
|
|
|
$
|
9,677
|
|
|
$
|
9,888
|
|
Order backlog
|
|
$
|
3,244
|
|
|
$
|
2,735
|
|
|
$
|
4,848
|
|
|
$
|
3,655
|
|
|
$
|
3,398
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
3,877
|
|
|
$
|
3,749
|
|
|
$
|
3,719
|
|
|
$
|
4,226
|
|
|
$
|
3,645
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
204
|
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
|
$
|
202
|
|
|
$
|
202
|
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
7,536
|
|
|
$
|
7,095
|
|
|
$
|
7,549
|
|
|
$
|
7,821
|
|
|
$
|
6,651
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
10,943
|
|
|
$
|
9,574
|
|
|
$
|
11,006
|
|
|
$
|
10,662
|
|
|
$
|
9,481
|
|
Capital expenditures, net of loss on fixed asset retirements
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
224
|
|
|
$
|
281
|
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
Regular employees
|
|
|
13,045
|
|
|
|
12,619
|
|
|
|
14,824
|
|
|
|
14,550
|
|
|
|
14,072
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Each fiscal year ended on the last Sunday in October. |
31
|
|
Item 7:
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Introduction
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (MD&A) is intended to facilitate
an understanding of Applieds business and results of
operations. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with
Applieds Consolidated Financial Statements and the
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included
elsewhere in this
Form 10-K.
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements and
should also be read in conjunction with the cautionary statement
set forth at the beginning of this
Form 10-K.
MD&A consists of the following sections:
|
|
|
|
|
Overview: a summary of Applieds business and
measurements
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations: a discussion of operating results.
|
|
|
|
Segment Information: a discussion of segment operating
results.
|
|
|
|
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources: an
analysis of cash flows, sources and uses of cash, contractual
obligations and financial position.
|
|
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies: a discussion of critical
accounting policies that require the exercise of judgments and
estimates.
|
Overview
Applied provides manufacturing equipment, services and software
to the global semiconductor, flat panel display, solar
photovoltaic (PV) and related industries. Applieds
customers include manufacturers of semiconductor wafers and
chips, flat panel liquid crystal displays (LCDs), solar PV cells
and modules, and other electronic devices. These customers may
use what they manufacture in their own end products or sell the
items to other companies for use in advanced electronic
components. Applied operates in four reportable segments:
Silicon Systems Group, Applied Global Services, Display, and
Energy and Environmental Solutions. Product development and
manufacturing activities occur primarily in North America,
Europe, Israel and Asia. Applieds broad range of equipment
and service products are highly technical and are sold primarily
through a direct sales force.
Applieds results historically have been driven primarily
by worldwide demand for semiconductors, which in turn depends on
end-user demand for electronic products. Each of Applieds
businesses is subject to highly cyclical industry conditions, as
demand for manufacturing equipment and services can change
depending on supply and demand for chips, LCDs, solar PVs and
other electronic devices, as well as other factors, such as
global economic and market conditions, and technological
advances in fabrication processes. After a challenging year in
fiscal 2009 that was characterized by credit constraints in the
financial markets, a weak global economy and a semiconductor
industry downturn, global economic and industry conditions
affecting Applieds businesses generally improved in fiscal
2010, except for conditions in the thin film solar PV market.
The following table presents certain significant measurements
for the past three fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010 over 2009
|
|
|
2009 over 2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts and percentages)
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
$
|
10,249
|
|
|
$
|
4,097
|
|
|
$
|
9,155
|
|
|
$
|
6,152
|
|
|
$
|
(5,058)
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
9,549
|
|
|
$
|
5,014
|
|
|
$
|
8,129
|
|
|
$
|
4,535
|
|
|
$
|
(3,115)
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
3,715
|
|
|
$
|
1,431
|
|
|
$
|
3,443
|
|
|
$
|
2,284
|
|
|
$
|
(2,012)
|
|
Gross margin percent
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
10 points
|
|
|
|
(14) points
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,384
|
|
|
$
|
(394
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,355
|
|
|
$
|
1,778
|
|
|
$
|
(1,749)
|
|
Operating margin percent
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
22 points
|
|
|
|
(25) points
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
938
|
|
|
$
|
(305
|
)
|
|
$
|
961
|
|
|
$
|
1,243
|
|
|
$
|
(1,266)
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
|
$
|
(0.93)
|
|
32
Financial results for fiscal 2010 over fiscal 2009 reflected
significantly increased demand for manufacturing equipment and
services due to more favorable global economic and industry
conditions. The increase in total orders from fiscal 2009 was
primarily due to increased demand for semiconductor, display and
crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar PV products, partially offset
by decreased demand for
SunFabtm
thin film solar lines. Net sales increased during fiscal 2010
compared to fiscal 2009, due primarily to higher sales of
semiconductor and display equipment.
Also, in fiscal 2010, Applied incurred charges totaling
$84 million associated with a restructuring program to
reduce its global workforce as of October 25, 2009 by
approximately 1,000 positions over a period of 18 months.
In addition, Applied incurred charges totaling $486 million
that included a plan to restructure its Energy and Environmental
Solutions segment. This action was in response to adverse market
conditions for thin film solar, including delays in
utility-scale solar adoption, solar panel manufacturers
challenges in obtaining affordable capital, changes and
uncertainty in government renewable energy policies, and
competitive pressure from c-Si solar technologies. As part of
the restructuring, Applied discontinued sales to new customers
of its fully-integrated SunFab lines but continued to offer
individual tools for thin film solar manufacturing. Applied is
supporting existing SunFab customers with services, upgrades and
capacity increases through its Applied Global Services segment
and will continue RD&E efforts to improve thin film panel
efficiency and high-productivity deposition.
Fiscal 2009 financial results reflected significantly reduced
demand for manufacturing equipment and services due to extremely
unfavorable global economic and industry conditions,
particularly in the first half of fiscal 2009. Negative trends
in consumer spending and pervasive economic uncertainty led some
customers to dramatically reduce factory operations and to
reduce their spending. In the second half of fiscal 2009, demand
for semiconductor and display equipment increased, but was still
down significantly from fiscal 2008 levels. Fiscal 2009
financial results included charges associated with restructuring
programs.
Fiscal 2008 financial results reflected decreased demand for
semiconductor equipment and, to a lesser extent, service
products, due to unfavorable market conditions in the
semiconductor industry, partially offset by increased demand for
LCD and solar products. New orders decreased from fiscal 2007
due to lower demand for semiconductor equipment from memory,
foundry and logic chip manufacturers, partially offset by
increased demand by LCD customers and, beginning in the first
quarter of fiscal 2008, the initial recognition of orders for
Applieds SunFab thin film line for manufacturing solar
panels. Net sales decreased during fiscal 2008 compared to
fiscal 2007 due to the decline in investment from memory and
logic customers, partially offset by increased sales of c-Si
solar manufacturing products. Net income decreased in fiscal
2008 compared to fiscal 2007 due to lower net sales, offset in
part by lower operating expenses. Fiscal 2008 financial results
included charges associated with restructuring programs.
33
Results
of Operations
The following table presents certain quarterly and full fiscal
year financial information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
|
Year
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
$
|
1,965
|
|
|
$
|
2,533
|
|
|
$
|
2,725
|
|
|
$
|
3,026
|
|
|
$
|
10,249
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,849
|
|
|
$
|
2,296
|
|
|
$
|
2,518
|
|
|
$
|
2,886
|
|
|
$
|
9,549
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
711
|
|
|
$
|
927
|
|
|
$
|
860
|
|
|
$
|
1,217
|
|
|
$
|
3,715
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
699
|
|
|
$
|
1,384
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
468
|
|
|
$
|
938
|
|
Earnings per diluted share
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
$
|
903
|
|
|
$
|
649
|
|
|
$
|
1,072
|
|
|
$
|
1,473
|
|
|
$
|
4,097
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,333
|
|
|
$
|
1,020
|
|
|
$
|
1,134
|
|
|
$
|
1,526
|
|
|
$
|
5,014
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
392
|
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
325
|
|
|
$
|
559
|
|
|
$
|
1,431
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(196
|
)
|
|
$
|
(293
|
)
|
|
$
|
(77
|
)
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
$
|
(394
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(133
|
)
|
|
$
|
(255
|
)
|
|
$
|
(55
|
)
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
(305
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per diluted share
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
$
|
2,500
|
|
|
$
|
2,414
|
|
|
$
|
2,030
|
|
|
$
|
2,212
|
|
|
$
|
9,155
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,087
|
|
|
$
|
2,150
|
|
|
$
|
1,848
|
|
|
$
|
2,044
|
|
|
$
|
8,129
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
935
|
|
|
$
|
967
|
|
|
$
|
742
|
|
|
$
|
799
|
|
|
$
|
3,443
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
373
|
|
|
$
|
438
|
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
|
$
|
316
|
|
|
$
|
1,355
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
303
|
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
$
|
961
|
|
Earnings per diluted share
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
Applieds business was subject to cyclical industry
conditions in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008. As a result of these
conditions and the changing global economic environment, there
were significant fluctuations in Applieds quarterly new
orders and net sales, both within and across the three fiscal
years. Demand for manufacturing equipment has historically been
volatile as a result of sudden changes in chip, LCD and solar PV
supply and demand and other factors, including global economic
and market conditions and rapid technological advances in
fabrication processes.
34
New
Orders
New orders by geographic region, which are attributed according
to the location of customers facilities, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010 over 2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009 over 2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
2,110
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Korea
|
|
|
2,155
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
China
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
1,224
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Southeast Asia
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
544
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
8,034
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
2,711
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
6,341
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
North America(*)
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
1,680
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
1,134
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
10,249
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
4,097
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
9,155
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Primarily the United States. |
New orders more than doubled to $10.2 billion in fiscal
2010 compared to fiscal 2009. The increase was principally due
to greater demand for semiconductor equipment and services,
primarily from memory and foundry customers, as well as
increased demand for c-Si solar manufacturing products and
display equipment. The increase in new orders reflected the
general recovery in the semiconductor equipment industry and the
LCD market from the steep downturn experienced in fiscal 2009.
New orders decreased 55 percent to $4.1 billion in
fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. The decrease in new orders
was across all segments, and particularly in the semiconductor
and display businesses, reflecting the challenging economic and
industry conditions prevalent during fiscal 2009. Customer
demand for semiconductor and LCD equipment began to recover in
the second half of fiscal 2009.
New orders decreased 5 percent to $9.2 billion in
fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007, due to lower demand for
semiconductor equipment from logic, memory, and foundry chip
manufacturers, partially offset by increased demand for LCD and
solar equipment, including the initial recognition of orders for
the Applied SunFab thin film line. Demand for LCD equipment
slowed substantially in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, as
Display customers absorbed capacity following robust demand over
the preceding three quarters.
Applieds backlog as of the end of each of the last three
fiscal years was as follows: $3.2 billion at
October 31, 2010, $2.7 billion at October 25,
2009, and $4.8 billion at October 26, 2008. Backlog
increased in fiscal 2010 primarily due to an increase in new
orders for Silicon Systems Group and Applied Global Services
reflecting increased demand for semiconductor equipment. Backlog
consists of: (1) orders for which written authorizations
have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the
next 12 months, or shipment has occurred but revenue has
not been recognized; (2) contractual service revenue and
maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months;
and (3) orders for SunFab lines that are anticipated to be
recognized as revenue within the next 12 months.
Applieds backlog at any particular time is not necessarily
indicative of actual sales for any future periods, due to the
potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or
cancellation of orders. In addition, the majority of sales in
the largest business segment were from orders received and
shipped in the same quarter.
35
Net
Sales
Net sales by geographic region, which are attributed according
to the location of customers facilities, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010 over 2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009 over 2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
1,837
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Korea
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
China
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Southeast Asia
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
7,421
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
3,295
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
5,660
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
North America(*)
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
9,549
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
5,014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
8,129
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Primarily the United States. |
Net sales of $9.5 billion for fiscal 2010 increased
90 percent from fiscal 2009, primarily due to higher sales
of semiconductor equipment. Net sales decreased 38 percent
to $5.0 billion in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008, as
a result of significantly lower sales of equipment and services
to semiconductor and display customers, partially offset by
increased sales of solar manufacturing equipment. Net sales
decreased 16 percent to $8.1 billion in fiscal 2008
compared to fiscal 2007, due to decreased investment from memory
and logic chip manufacturers, partially offset by increased
demand from solar and LCD customers.
Gross
Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010 over 2009
|
|
|
2009 over 2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
3,715
|
|
|
$
|
1,431
|
|
|
$
|
3,443
|
|
|
$
|
2,284
|
|
|
$
|
(2,012)
|
|
Gross margin (% of net sales)
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
10 points
|
|
|
|
(13) points
|
|
The increase in the gross margin as a percentage of net sales in
fiscal 2010 from fiscal 2009 was principally attributable to
higher net sales, more favorable product mix, improved factory
utilization, and continued cost control measures, offset in part
by inventory-related charges of $330 million associated
with SunFab thin film solar equipment. These inventory-related
charges lowered gross margin for fiscal 2010 by approximately
3 percentage points. The decrease in the gross margin
percentage in fiscal 2009 from fiscal 2008 was due to lower net
sales, lower-margin product mix, and reduced factory absorption,
offset in part by cost control initiatives. Gross margin during
fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 included $32 million,
$28 million and $32 million, respectively, of
share-based compensation expense.
Research,
Development and Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010 over 2009
|
|
|
2009 over 2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research, development and engineering
|
|
$
|
1,144
|
|
|
$
|
934
|
|
|
$
|
1,104
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
|
$
|
(170
|
)
|
Applieds future operating results depend to a considerable
extent on its ability to maintain a competitive advantage in the
equipment and service products it provides. Applied believes
that it is critical to continue to make substantial investments
in RD&E to assure the availability of innovative technology
that meets the current and
36
projected requirements of its customers most advanced
designs. Applied historically has maintained its commitment to
investing in RD&E in order to continue to offer new
products and technologies. RD&E expenses were
$1.1 billion (12 percent of net sales) in fiscal 2010,
$934 million (19 percent of net sales) in fiscal 2009
and $1.1 billion (14 percent of net sales) in fiscal
2008. RD&E expense during fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008
included $43 million, $50 million and
$59 million, respectively, of share-based compensation
expense. Development cycles range from 12 to 36 months
depending on whether the product is an enhancement of an
existing product, which typically has a shorter development
cycle, or a new product, which typically has a longer
development cycle. Most of Applieds existing products
resulted from internal development activities and innovations
involving new technologies, materials and processes. In certain
instances, Applied acquires technologies, either in existing or
new product areas, to complement its existing technology
capabilities and to reduce time to market.
In fiscal 2010, Applied developed new technology to enable
next-generation 22nm and below chip designs. These systems were
designed to help customers continue their drive to pack more
transistors in the same space using using high-k/metal gate
technologies and double patterning processes. Applied also
developed technology for through-silicon vias (TSVs), an
emerging solution for interconnecting three dimensional chip
stacks to provide better device performance, lower power
consumption and the integration of heterogeneous devices. In the
solar PV area, Applied continued the development of its
precision wafering and cell manufacturing products for lowering
the cost of producing solar-generated electricity through
advanced crystalline silicon technology.
In fiscal 2009, Applied focused on developing systems for
semiconductor customers new chip designs with 32nm and
below geometries, including systems to enable faster transistors
using strain engineering and high-k/metal gate technologies, as
well as double patterning processes that enable customers to
extend their existing 193nm lithography tools through additional
technology generations. Applied also focused on developing
technology for manufacturing next generation displays. RD&E
also included activities to develop products that enable
lower-cost production of solar energy and other products to
enable energy conservation.
In fiscal 2008, Applied focused on the development of processes
and systems for the continued scaling of semiconductor devices.
Applied pioneered a self-aligned double patterning approach that
can enable 22nm and below device fabrication using conventional
optical lithography. The Company also developed technology for
the implementation of through-silicon vias. Efforts were also
focused on developing the systems and technology to reduce the
cost-per-watt
of solar electricity.
Marketing,
Selling, General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010 over 2009
|
|
|
2009 over 2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing, selling, general and administrative
|
|
$
|
942
|
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
965
|
|
|
$
|
207
|
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
The increase in marketing, selling, general and administrative
expenses in fiscal 2010 from fiscal 2009 reflected the
elimination of temporary salary reductions and shutdowns, and
the resumption of variable compensation programs. The decrease
in marketing, selling, general and administrative expenses in
fiscal 2009 from fiscal 2008 was primarily due to cost control
initiatives. Marketing, selling, general and administrative
expenses were 10 percent of net sales in fiscal 2010,
15 percent of net sales in fiscal 2009, and 12 percent
of net sales in fiscal 2008. Marketing, selling and general and
administrative expenses during fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008
included $51 million, $69 million and
$88 million, respectively, of share-based compensation
expense.
Restructuring
and Asset Impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010 over 2009
|
|
|
2009 over 2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and asset impairments
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied announced a
plan to restructure its Energy and Environmental Solutions
segment. The action, which was expected to impact between 400 to
500 positions globally, was in response to adverse market
conditions for thin film solar, including delays in
utility-scale solar adoption, solar panel
37
manufacturers challenges in obtaining affordable capital,
changes and uncertainty in government renewable energy polices,
and competitive pressure from c-Si solar technologies. During
fiscal 2010, Applied recorded charges related to this plan
totaling $403 million, which included inventory-related
charges of $247 million related to SunFab thin film solar
equipment, asset impairment charges of $108 million,
employee severance charges of $45 million, and other costs
of $3 million.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied announced a
restructuring program to reduce its global workforce as of
October 25, 2009 by approximately 1,300 to 1,500 positions,
or 10 to 12 percent, over a period of 18 months.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied recorded
restructuring charges of $104 million associated with this
program. During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, as a result of
changes in business requirements, Applied revised its global
workforce reduction to approximately 1,000 positions and
recorded a favorable adjustment of $20 million.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, Applied announced a
restructuring program to reduce its global workforce by
approximately 1,800 positions. During the second quarter of
fiscal 2009, Applied expanded the scope of the restructuring
program by approximately 200 positions. During fiscal 2009,
Applied recorded restructuring charges of $143 million
associated with this program. The restructuring charges
consisted of employee-related costs to reduce the Companys
workforce through a combination of attrition, voluntary
separation and other workforce reduction programs. In addition,
Applied determined that the carrying value of certain fixed
assets to be sold exceeded the estimated fair value and, as a
result, recorded a $15 million impairment charge.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, Applied announced a
global cost reduction plan that primarily affected its Silicon
Systems Group and Applied Global Services segments and related
support organizations. As part of this plan, Applied reduced its
global workforce through a combination of job elimination and
attrition. For fiscal 2008, Applied recorded restructuring
charges of $29 million relating to this plan, consisting
primarily of employee related costs to reduce its workforce. The
affected employees were based in North America, Europe and Asia,
and represented multiple functions.
For further details, see Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Net
Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010 over 2009
|
|
|
2009 over 2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(62
|
)
|
The decrease in net interest income in fiscal 2010 from fiscal
2009 was primarily due to a decrease in interest rates. The
decrease in net interest income in fiscal 2009 from fiscal 2008
was primarily due to a decrease in interest rates. The decrease
in net interest income in fiscal 2008 from fiscal 2007 was
primarily due to a reduction in investments and a decrease in
interest rates, offset by a decrease in interest expense
associated with scheduled debt maturities that occurred in
September 2007.
Income
Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010 over 2009
|
|
|
2009 over 2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
|
$
|
(180
|
)
|
|
$
|
448
|
|
|
$
|
629
|
|
|
$
|
(628)
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
(37
|
)%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
69 points
|
|
|
|
(69) points
|
|
The change in the fiscal 2010 tax rate from the fiscal 2009 rate
was principally attributable to the income before taxes for
fiscal 2010 as opposed to the net loss before taxes incurred in
fiscal 2009. The effective income tax rate for fiscal 2010 did
not include the impact of the U.S. R&D tax credit from
the time it expired in December 2009. In the event the
U.S. R&D tax credit is enacted on a retroactive basis,
there would be a favorable impact to Applieds effective
income tax rate in the period enacted. The change in the fiscal
2009 tax rate from the fiscal 2008 rate was
38
principally attributable to the net loss before taxes incurred
in fiscal 2009. Applieds effective income tax rate depends
on various factors, such as tax legislation, and the geographic
composition of Applieds pre-tax income.
Segment
Information
Applied reports financial results in four segments: Silicon
Systems Group, Applied Global Services, Display, and Energy and
Environmental Solutions. A description of the products and
services, as well as financial data, for each reportable segment
can be found in Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed
Financial Statements. Applied does not allocate to its
reportable segments certain operating expenses that it manages
separately at the corporate level. These unallocated costs
include costs for share-based compensation; certain management,
finance, legal, human resources, and RD&E functions
provided at the corporate level; and unabsorbed information
technology and occupancy. In addition, Applied does not allocate
to its reportable segments restructuring and asset impairment
charges and any associated adjustments related to restructuring
actions, unless these charges or adjustments pertain to a
specific reportable segment.
Effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied changed
its methodology for allocating certain expenses to its
reportable segments, such as components of variable compensation
and operating expenses associated with the global sales
organization. Applied has reclassified segment operating results
for fiscal 2009 and 2008 to conform to the fiscal 2010
presentation.
The results for each reportable segment are discussed below.
Silicon
Systems Group Segment
The Silicon Systems Group segment includes semiconductor capital
equipment for deposition, etch, rapid thermal processing,
chemical mechanical planarization, metrology and inspection, and
wafer packaging. Development efforts are focused on solving
customers key technical challenges, including transistor
performance and nanoscale patterning, and improving chip
manufacturing productivity to reduce costs.
Certain significant measures for the past three fiscal years
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010 over 2009
|
|
|
2009 over 2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
$
|
5,759
|
|
|
$
|
1,677
|
|
|
$
|
4,092
|
|
|
$
|
4,082
|
|
|
|
243
|
%
|
|
$
|
(2,415
|
)
|
|
|
(59)
|
%
|
Net sales
|
|
|
5,304
|
|
|
|
1,960
|
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
|
|
3,344
|
|
|
|
171
|
%
|
|
|
(2,045
|
)
|
|
|
(51)
|
%
|
Operating income
|
|
|
1,892
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
1,229
|
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
|
|
841
|
%
|
|
|
(1,028
|
)
|
|
|
(84)
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 points
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21) points
|
|
Fiscal 2010 financial results reflected increased demand for
manufacturing equipment over fiscal 2009 due to improved global
economic and industry conditions. New orders increased by
$4.1 billion to $5.8 billion for fiscal 2010 compared
to fiscal 2009. The significant increase in new orders was
primarily from memory and foundry customers and to a lesser
extent logic customers, which reflected the general recovery in
the semiconductor equipment industry. The majority of fiscal
2010 new orders were for customers capacity expansions,
while fiscal 2009 orders were primarily for customers new
technology investments. Net sales increased by $3.3 billion
to $5.3 billion for fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009.
The increase in net sales was primarily due to increased
investment by memory and foundry customers. Four customers
accounted for 51 percent of net sales in this segment in
fiscal 2010. Approximately 61 percent of net sales in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 were for orders received and
shipped within the quarter. The book to bill ratio (new orders
divided by net sales) increased to 1.1 for fiscal 2010,
reflecting increased demand, compared to 0.9 for fiscal 2009.
Operating income increased by $1.7 billion to
$1.9 billion for fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009. The
increase in operating income for fiscal 2010 was due to
considerably higher revenue from semiconductor equipment sales
and reflected the general recovery in the semiconductor
equipment industry during fiscal 2010. Results for fiscal 2010
included Semitool, which was acquired by Applied during the
first quarter of fiscal 2010. In 2010, Applied introduced its
Applied Reflexion GT CMP system, for fabricating copper
interconnects and its Applied Centura
AdvantEdgetm
Mesatm
silicon etch system for fabricating nano-scale circuit features
with angstrom-level precision. The Applied Producer
Eternatm
39
FCVD system, which is targeted for 20nm and below chips,
delivers a liquid-like film that flows freely into virtually any
structure to provide void-free dielectric fill.
Fiscal 2009 financial results reflected significantly reduced
demand for manufacturing equipment due to extremely unfavorable
global economic and industry conditions. Silicon Systems Group
new orders decreased 59 percent to $1.7 billion in
fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. The decrease in new orders
reflected significantly lower demand, primarily from memory and
logic customers. Net sales decreased 51 percent to
$2.0 billion in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. The
decrease in net sales was due to decreased capital investments,
primarily by memory customers. The book to bill ratio decreased
to 0.9 for fiscal 2009, reflecting significantly decreased
demand, compared to 1.0 for fiscal 2008. Operating income
decreased 84 percent to $201 million in fiscal 2009
compared to fiscal 2008. The decrease in operating income was
due to significantly lower sales resulting in lower factory
absorption, partially offset by lower operating expenses from
cost control initiatives. Operating income for fiscal 2009 also
reflected an increase in bad debt expense. After an operating
loss in the first half of fiscal 2009, the Silicon Systems Group
returned to operating profitability during the second half of
the year, which was primarily driven by sales to foundry
customers. During the year, the Company introduced a new
platform specifically designed for under-bump metallization
(UBM) and other back-end processes, the Applied Charger UBM PVD
system.
Fiscal 2008 financial results reflected reduced demand for
manufacturing equipment due to less favorable industry
conditions. Fiscal 2008 Silicon Systems Group new orders
decreased 38 percent to $4.1 billion compared to
fiscal 2007. The decrease in new orders was due to reduced
demand for equipment from logic, memory and foundry customers.
Net sales decreased 38 percent to $4.0 billion in
fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007. The decrease in net sales
was due to decreased investment by logic and memory customers.
Operating income decreased 48 percent to $1.2 billion
in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007. The decrease in
operating income was due to significantly lower revenue levels
from the slowdown in the semiconductor equipment industry,
partially offset by lower operating expenses attributable to
continued focus on cost controls and improvement in
manufacturing activities. In fiscal 2008, the Company launched
two products for photomask applications: the Applied Aera2 Mask
Inspection system, which detects critical defects on a
photomask, and the Applied Tetra Reticle Clean system, which
cleans 32nm and below photomasks using wet clean chemistry. The
Company also introduced the Applied Producer eHARP system for
depositing films in high aspect ratio device structures.
Applied
Global Services Segment
The Applied Global Services segment encompasses technically
differentiated products, including spares, services, certain
earlier generation equipment products, and remanufactured
equipment, to improve operating efficiency, reduce operating
costs, and lessen the environmental impact of semiconductor,
display and solar customers factories. Customer demand for
products and services is fulfilled through a global distribution
system with trained service engineers located in close proximity
to customer sites.
Certain significant measures for the past three fiscal years
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010 over 2009
|
|
|
2009 over 2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
$
|
2,183
|
|
|
$
|
1,179
|
|
|
$
|
2,249
|
|
|
$
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
|
$
|
(1,070
|
)
|
|
|
(48)
|
%
|
Net sales
|
|
|
1,865
|
|
|
|
1,397
|
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
(932
|
)
|
|
|
(40)
|
%
|
Operating income
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
193
|
%
|
|
|
(430
|
)
|
|
|
(79)
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 points
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15) points
|
|
Fiscal 2010 financial results reflected increased demand for
manufacturing services over fiscal 2009 due to improved global
economic and industry conditions. New orders increased by
$1.0 billion to $2.2 billion for fiscal 2010 compared
to fiscal 2009. The increase in new orders was due primarily to
higher demand for spare parts and refurbished equipment,
reflecting customers higher factory utilization rates. Net
sales increased by $468 million to $1.9 billion for
fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009. The increase in net sales
was primarily due to higher sales in spare parts. The book to
bill ratio increased to 1.2 for fiscal 2010, reflecting
increased demand, compared to 0.8 for
40
fiscal 2009. Operating income increased by $222 million to
$337 million for fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009. The
increase in operating income for fiscal 2010 primarily reflected
increased sales of spare parts.
Fiscal 2009 financial results reflected significantly reduced
demand for manufacturing services due to extremely unfavorable
global economic and industry conditions, as well as a
significant reduction in the installed base of 200mm systems.
New orders decreased 48 percent to $1.2 billion in
fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008, due primarily to decreased
demand for spares and refurbished equipment arising from
semiconductor manufacturers low wafer production volumes.
Net sales decreased 40 percent to $1.4 billion in
fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008, reflecting lower sales of
spares and refurbished equipment. Operating income decreased
79 percent to $115 million in fiscal 2009 compared to
fiscal 2008 as a result of lower sales volumes, which led to
lower infrastructure cost absorption, partially offset by lower
operating expenses from cost control initiatives. Operating
income for fiscal 2009 also included an increase in bad debt
expense. In the second half of fiscal 2009, the Applied Global
Services segment returned to operating profitability as sales of
spares improved. The book to bill ratio decreased to 0.8 for
fiscal 2009, reflecting significantly decreased demand, compared
to 1.0 for fiscal 2008.
Fiscal 2008 financial results reflected reduced demand for
manufacturing services due to less favorable industry
conditions. Fiscal 2008 results were impacted by lower levels of
semiconductor and display customers factory utilization.
New orders decreased 10 percent to $2.2 billion in
fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007, due to lower orders for
spares, fab-wide services, and refurbished equipment, partially
offset by increased orders for service and system enhancements.
Net sales decreased 1 percent to $2.3 billion in
fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007. The net sales decrease
reflected lower sales of fab-wide services and spares, offset by
increased sales in services and system enhancements. Operating
income decreased 9 percent to $545 million in fiscal
2008 compared to fiscal 2007 due to higher operating expenses in
fiscal 2008.
Display
Segment
The Display segment encompasses products for manufacturing LCDs
for TVs, personal computers and other video-enabled devices. The
business is focused on expanding market share by differentiation
with larger-scale substrates, entry into new markets, and
development of products to enable cost reductions through
productivity and uniformity.
Certain significant measures for the past three fiscal years
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010 over 2009
|
|
|
2009 over 2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
$
|
799
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
1,486
|
|
|
$
|
512
|
|
|
|
179
|
%
|
|
$
|
(1,199
|
)
|
|
|
(81)
|
%
|
Net sales
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
79
|
%
|
|
|
(474
|
)
|
|
|
(49)
|
%
|
Operating income
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
424
|
%
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
(83)
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 points
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21) points
|
|
Fiscal 2010 operating financial results reflected increased
demand for LCD equipment over fiscal 2009 due to improved global
economic and industry conditions. New orders increased by
$512 million to $799 million for fiscal 2010 compared
to fiscal 2009. The increase in new orders reflected the general
recovery in the LCD market, as customers increased production
levels in response to strong end-demand for flat panel TVs and
notebook computers. Net sales increased by $397 million to
$899 million for fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009. The
increase in net sales reflected strong market demand for LCD
products. Five customers accounted for 71 percent of net
sales for the Display segment in fiscal 2010. The book to bill
ratio increased to 0.9 for fiscal 2010, reflecting increased
demand, compared to 0.6 for fiscal 2009. Operating income
increased by $216 million to $267 million for fiscal
2010 compared to fiscal 2009. The increase in operating income
was due to a significant increase in net sales and improved
gross margin driven by an increase in volume.
Fiscal 2009 financial results reflected significantly reduced
demand for LCD equipment due to extremely unfavorable global
economic and industry conditions. New orders decreased
significantly to $287 million in fiscal 2009 compared to
$1.5 billion in fiscal 2008, which reflected the slowdown
in the display industry from fiscal 2008 when display
manufacturers added capacity. Net sales decreased
49 percent to $502 million in fiscal 2009 compared
41
to fiscal 2008 as a result of significantly lower orders.
Operating income decreased to $51 million in fiscal 2009
from $301 million in fiscal 2008. Operating income
decreased due to significantly lower revenue, partially offset
by lower operating expenses due to cost control initiatives. The
book to bill ratio decreased to 0.6 for fiscal 2009, reflecting
significantly decreased demand, compared to 1.5 for fiscal 2008.
Fiscal 2008 financial results reflected increased demand for LCD
equipment over fiscal 2007. In fiscal 2008, new orders increased
significantly to $1.5 billion compared to $273 million
in fiscal 2007. Increased orders were due to substantial
increases in demand by Display customers in response to strong
end-product demand. This demand for LCD equipment reached an
inflection point in the third quarter of fiscal 2008 and
decreased significantly in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008,
reflecting the volatility of the display industry. Net sales
increased 38 percent to $976 million in fiscal 2008
compared to fiscal 2007, primarily due to customers
investment in Gen-8 products. Operating income increased to
$301 million in fiscal 2008 from $159 million in
fiscal 2007. Operating income increased due to higher revenue
levels, product mix and lower operating costs. In fiscal 2008,
the Company introduced its Gen-10 systems that can process
substrates sized at approximately 2.85 x 3.05 meters. These
systems include the AKT-90K PECVD and AKT-90K EBT products.
Energy
and Environmental Solutions Segment
The Energy and Environmental Solutions segment includes products
for fabricating thin film and c Si solar PVs, high
throughput
roll-to-roll
coating systems for flexible electronics and web products, and
systems used in the manufacture of energy-efficient glass. This
business is focused on delivering solutions to generate and
conserve energy, with an emphasis on lowering the cost to
produce solar power by providing equipment to enhance
manufacturing scale and efficiency.
In fiscal 2010, Applied incurred charges of $486 million
that included a plan to restructure its Energy and Environmental
Solutions segment as described above and consisted of
inventory-related charges of $330 million related to SunFab
thin film solar equipment, asset impairment charges of
$108 million, employee severance charges of
$45 million, and other costs of $3 million.
Certain significant measures for the past three fiscal years
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010 over 2009
|
|
|
2009 over 2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
$
|
1,508
|
|
|
$
|
955
|
|
|
$
|
1,329
|
|
|
$
|
553
|
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
$
|
(374
|
)
|
|
|
(28)
|
%
|
Net sales
|
|
|
1,481
|
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
Operating income
|
|
|
(466
|
)
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
(99)
|
%
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(14)
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
(31
|
)%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(25
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11) points
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 points
|
|
Fiscal 2010 financial results reflected increased demand for
c-Si products, offset by reduced demand for SunFab thin film
solar manufacturing lines due to the challenging market
conditions for utility-scale solar. New orders increased
58 percent to $1.5 billion for fiscal 2010 compared to
fiscal 2009. The increase in orders reflected increased demand
for c-Si products, particularly wafering and metallization
products, offset by reduced demand for SunFab lines. Net sales
increased 28 percent to $1.5 billion for fiscal 2010
compared to fiscal 2009. Net sales for fiscal 2010 primarily
reflected higher sales to c-Si customers than in fiscal 2009.
The relative share of the segments net sales attributable
to SunFab customers decreased to 36 percent in fiscal 2010 from
44 percent in fiscal 2009. The book to bill ratio increased to
1.0 for fiscal 2010 compared to 0.8 for fiscal 2009. The
operating loss in the Energy and Environmental Solutions segment
increased by $232 million to $466 million for fiscal
2010 compared to fiscal 2009. The increase in operating loss was
primarily due to restructuring, asset impairment and
inventory-related charges of $486 million recognized in the
second and third quarters of fiscal 2010, and lower net sales to
SunFab customers, partially offset by increased sales of c-Si
products and cost control initiatives. Results for the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2010 reflected customer final acceptance of
two SunFab lines.
Fiscal 2009 financial results reflected reduced demand for c-Si
products over fiscal 2008 offset in part by higher demand for
SunFab lines. New orders of $955 million in fiscal 2009
decreased from $1.3 billion in fiscal 2008. The decrease in
new orders was primarily due to decreased demand from c-Si
customers and reflected the
42
challenging global economic environment, solar
manufacturers difficulties in obtaining cost-effective
capital, and a decrease in end demand. Net sales of
$1.2 billion in fiscal 2009 increased from
$819 million in fiscal 2008 due to an increase in sales for
SunFab lines. The operating loss of $234 million in fiscal
2009 increased from $206 million in fiscal 2008 due to an
increase in RD&E expenses and unfavorable gross margins
associated with initial SunFab line
start-ups,
offset in part by cost control initiatives. In 2009, the Company
introduced its Baccini Esatto Technology, a high precision,
multi-step printing capability designed to increase the
efficiency of c-Si solar cells. The book to bill ratio decreased
to 0.8 for fiscal 2009, reflecting significantly decreased
demand, compared to 1.6 for fiscal 2008.
Fiscal 2008 financial results reflected increased demand for
c-Si products over fiscal 2007 and the recognition of orders for
the SunFab line beginning in fiscal 2008. New orders of
$1.3 billion in fiscal 2008 increased from
$245 million in fiscal 2007. The increase in new orders was
primarily due to the recognition of orders for the SunFab line
beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2008, as well as growth
in orders for c-Si products. Net sales of $819 million in
fiscal 2008 increased from $165 million in fiscal 2007 due
to customers investment in c-Si products from the
acquisitions of HCT and Baccini, in addition to increased sales
across all other products in the segment. The increase in net
sales for fiscal 2008 included the first revenue recognition of
a SunFab line. The operating loss of $206 million in fiscal
2008 increased from $89 million in fiscal 2007. The
increase in operating loss reflected increased RD&E
spending to develop products that enable lower-cost production
of solar energy, increased operating costs, amortization of
acquisition-related costs, and costs related to expansion of
solar marketing efforts, partially offset by higher revenues.
Subsequent
Event
On November 29, 2010, Applied entered into a Settlement
Agreement (the Agreement) with Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
(Samsung). The Agreement resolved potential civil claims and
removed the risk of civil litigation between the parties
relating to the alleged acquisition, misappropriation and misuse
of Samsung confidential semiconductor information in Korea that
is the subject of criminal proceedings pending against employees
of several companies, including current and former Applied
Materials Korea employees, in the Seoul Eastern District Court
of the Republic of Korea (the Korea proceedings). Neither
Applied nor any of its subsidiaries is a defendant in the Korea
proceedings. The settlement terms of the Agreement pertain to
potential civil claims between the parties and are separate from
and do not affect criminal proceedings against individual
defendants, including but not limited to the individuals charged
in the Korea proceedings.
Under the Agreement, which is generally effective for a
three-year period starting November 1, 2010, Applied will
provide volume-based rebates on purchases of semiconductor
products by Samsung and its affiliated companies. Applied also
will provide volume-based incentives related to Samsungs
use of Applied systems (i) for production of semiconductor
devices in applications for which Samsung has not previously
used Applied systems, and (ii) for joint development
activities. In addition, the Agreement includes volume-based
credits for certain upgrades, engineering services and spare
parts. The financial impact of the above rebates and incentives
on Applieds consolidated results of operations and
financial position will depend on the volume of purchases by
Samsung after the effective date of the Agreement.
Business
Combinations
On December 21, 2009, Applied acquired Semitool, Inc., a
public company based in the state of Montana, for a purchase
price of $323 million in cash, net of cash acquired,
pursuant to a tender offer and subsequent short-form merger. The
acquired business is a leading supplier of electrochemical
plating and wafer surface preparation equipment used by
semiconductor packaging and manufacturing companies globally.
Applieds primary reasons for this acquisition were to
complement its existing product offerings and to provide
opportunities for future growth. The acquired business is
included in results for the Silicon Systems Group segment.
In November 2009, Applied acquired substantially all the assets,
including the intellectual property, of Advent Solar, a
developer of advanced technology for c-Si solar photovoltaic
cells and modules (PVs), for a purchase price of
$14 million. This acquisition complemented Applieds
portfolio of solar PV technologies and enhanced
43
Applieds opportunities in the c-Si equipment market. The
acquisition is included in results for the Energy and
Environmental Solutions segment.
On January 31, 2008, Applied acquired all of the
outstanding shares of Baccini S.p.A., a privately-held company
based in Italy, for a purchase price of $215 million in
cash, net of cash and marketable securities acquired. The
acquired business is a leading supplier of automated
metallization and test systems for manufacturing c-Si
photovoltaic cells.
On November 9, 2007, Applied purchased from Edwards Vacuum,
Inc. certain assets of its Kachina semiconductor equipment parts
cleaning and refurbishment business for $19 million.
For further details, see Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2010, the FASB issued updated authoritative guidance
that amends the requirements for evaluating whether a decision
maker or service provider has a variable interest entity and
clarified that a quantitative approach should not be the sole
consideration in assessing the criteria for variable interest
entity determination. The guidance also clarifies that related
parties should be considered in applying all of the decision
maker and service provider criteria. This is in addition to the
authoritative guidance the FASB issued in June 2009 that applies
to determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity
and requiring an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine
whether the enterprises variable interest or interests
give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest
entity. Under this guidance, an enterprise has a controlling
financial interest when it has (1) the power to direct the
activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly
impact the entitys economic performance and (2) the
obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to
receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be
significant to the variable interest entity. The guidance also
requires an enterprise to assess whether it has an implicit
financial responsibility to ensure that a variable interest
entity operates as designed when determining whether it has
power to direct the activities of the variable interest entity
that most significantly impact the entitys economic
performance. The guidance also requires ongoing assessments of
whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity, requires enhanced disclosures, and eliminates
the scope exclusion for qualifying special-purpose entities.
This authoritative guidance is effective for Applied beginning
in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The implementation of this
authoritative guidance is not expected to have a material impact
on Applieds financial position or results of operations.
In January 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for fair
value measurements, which requires additional disclosures and
clarifications to existing disclosures. This authoritative
guidance requires a reporting entity to disclose separately the
amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and
Level 2 fair value measurements and also to describe the
reasons for these transfers. This authoritative guidance also
requires enhanced disclosure of activity in Level 3 fair
value measurements. The new disclosures and clarifications of
existing disclosures for Level 1 and Level 2 fair
value measurements became effective for Applied in the second
quarter of fiscal 2010. Disclosures regarding activity within
Level 3 fair value measurements become effective the first
interim reporting period after December 15, 2010 and will
be effective for Applied in the second quarter of fiscal 2011.
Applied is evaluating the potential impact of the implementation
of this authoritative guidance on its consolidated financial
statements. See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for information and related disclosures regarding
Applieds fair value measurements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on variable
interest entities, which requires revised evaluations of whether
entities represent variable interest entities, ongoing
assessments of control over such entities, and additional
disclosures for variable interests. In December 2009, the FASB
issued authoritative guidance on the financial reporting by
entities involved with variable interest entities which amends
previously issued guidance on variable interest entities. The
amendments in this authoritative guidance replace the
quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining
which reporting entity, if any, has a controlling financial
interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused
on identifying which reporting entity has the power to direct
the activities of a variable interest entity that most
significantly impact the entitys economic performance and
(1) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or
(2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. This
authoritative guidance becomes
44
effective for Applied in fiscal 2011. The implementation of this
authoritative guidance is not expected to have a material impact
on Applieds financial position or results of operations.
Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Applieds cash, cash equivalents and investments increased
to $3.9 billion at October 31, 2010 from
$3.3 billion at October 25, 2009, due primarily to an
increase in cash generated from operating activities. Applied
has not undertaken any significant external financing activities
for several years.
Cash, cash equivalents and investments consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
October 25,
|
|
|
October 26,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,858
|
|
|
$
|
1,577
|
|
|
$
|
1,412
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
|
|
1,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash, cash-equivalents and investments
|
|
$
|
3,892
|
|
|
$
|
3,267
|
|
|
$
|
3,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of cash provided by (used in) operating, investing,
and financing activities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
1,723
|
|
|
$
|
333
|
|
|
$
|
1,710
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
$
|
(862
|
)
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
|
$
|
(76
|
)
|
Cash used in financing activities
|
|
$
|
(576
|
)
|
|
$
|
(281
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,426
|
)
|
Applied generated cash from operating activities of
$1.7 billion in fiscal 2010, $333 million in fiscal
2009, and $1.7 billion in fiscal 2008. The primary sources
of cash from operating activities for fiscal 2010 were net
income, as adjusted to exclude the effect of non-cash charges
including, depreciation, amortization, restructuring and asset
impairments, share-based compensation, and changes in components
of working capital. Changes in working capital included thin
film solar inventory-related charges of $330 million.
Applied utilized programs to discount letters of credit issued
by customers of $230 million in fiscal 2010 and
$299 million in fiscal 2009, and $167 million in
fiscal 2008. Discounting of letters of credit depends on many
factors, including the willingness of financial institutions to
discount the letters of credit and the cost of such
arrangements. For fiscal 2010, Applied factored accounts
receivable of $153 million and discounted promissory notes
of $3 million. For fiscal 2009, Applied factored accounts
receivable of $39 million and discounted promissory notes
of $4 million. For fiscal 2008, Applied factored accounts
receivable of $133 million and discounted promissory notes
of $6 million. Days sales outstanding were 58 at the end of
fiscal 2010, 75 days at the end of fiscal 2009, and
79 days at the end of fiscal 2008. The 2010 reduction in
the days sales outstanding from the prior year was attributable
to higher net sales and improved working capital management.
Applieds working capital was $3.9 billion at
October 31, 2010 and $3.7 billion at both
October 25, 2009 and October 26, 2008. During fiscal
2010, Applied received a U.S. federal income tax refund of
approximately $130 million for the carryback of
Applieds net operating loss from fiscal 2009 to fiscal
2005.
Applied used $862 million of cash for investing activities
in fiscal 2010. Applied generated $113 million of cash from
investing activities in fiscal 2009 and used $76 million in
fiscal 2008. Purchases of investments, net of proceeds from
sales and maturities of investments, totaled $370 million
in fiscal 2010. Proceeds from sales and maturities of
investments, net of purchases of investments, totaled
$361 million in fiscal 2009 and $405 million in fiscal
2008. Capital expenditures were $169 million in fiscal
2010, $248 million in fiscal 2009, and $288 million in
fiscal 2008. These expenditures were primarily for the
implementation of an enterprise resource planning software
system and the construction of a solar R&D/demonstration
center in Xian, China. Capital expenditures for fiscal
2010 and fiscal 2009 also included investment to construct a
facility in Singapore.
Investing activities also included investments in technology and
acquisitions of companies to allow Applied to access new market
opportunities or emerging technologies. In fiscal 2010, Applied
acquired Semitool, a public company based in the state of
Montana, for $323 million, net of cash acquired. During
fiscal 2008, Applied acquired
45
all of the outstanding shares of Baccini, a privately-held
company based in Italy, for a purchase price of
$215 million in cash, net of cash and marketable securities
acquired. Also in fiscal 2008, Applied purchased certain assets
from Edwards Vacuum, Inc. consisting of its Kachina
semiconductor equipment parts cleaning and refurbishment
business for $19 million. See Note 9 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
Applied used cash for financing activities in the amount of
$576 million for fiscal 2010, $281 million for fiscal
2009, and $1.4 billion for fiscal 2008. Financing
activities included payment of cash dividends to stockholders
and issuances and repurchases of common stock. Cash used to
repurchase shares totaled $350 million in fiscal 2010,
$23 million in fiscal 2009, and $1.5 billion in fiscal
2008. In March 2010, Applieds Board of Directors approved
a new stock repurchase program authorizing up to
$2.0 billion in repurchases over the next three years
ending in March 2013. Proceeds from stock issuances related
to equity compensation awards were $129 million in fiscal
2010, $62 million in fiscal 2009, and $401 million in
fiscal 2008.
During fiscal 2010, Applieds Board of Directors declared
three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $0.07 per share
each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $0.06 per
share. The fourth quarterly cash dividend of $0.07 per share
declared in fiscal 2010 will be paid on December 15, 2010
to stockholders of record as of November 24, 2010. During
fiscal 2009, Applieds Board of Directors declared four
quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $0.06 per share each
quarter. During fiscal 2008, Applieds Board of Directors
declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $0.06
per share each. Cash paid in dividends during fiscal 2010, 2009
and 2008 amounted to $349 million, $320 million and
$325 million, respectively. Applied currently anticipates
that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis
in the future, although the declaration and amount of any future
cash dividend are at the discretion of the Board of Directors
and will depend on Applieds financial condition, results
of operations, capital requirements, business conditions and
other factors, as well as a determination that cash dividends
are in the best interest of Applieds stockholders.
Applied has credit facilities for unsecured borrowings in
various currencies of up to $1.1 billion, of which
$1.0 billion is comprised of a
5-year
revolving credit agreement with a group of banks that is
scheduled to expire in January 2012. This agreement provides for
borrowings in United States dollars at interest rates keyed to
one of the two rates selected by Applied for each advance, and
includes financial and other covenants with which Applied was in
compliance at October 31, 2010. Remaining credit facilities
in the amount of approximately $98 million are with
Japanese banks. Applieds ability to borrow under these
facilities is subject to bank approval at the time of the
borrowing request, and any advances will be at rates indexed to
the banks prime reference rate denominated in Japanese
yen. No amounts were outstanding under any of the above credit
facilities at October 31, 2010.
In the ordinary course of business, Applied provides standby
letters of credit or other guarantee instruments to third
parties as required for certain transactions initiated by either
Applied or its subsidiaries. As of October 31, 2010, the
maximum potential amount of future payments that Applied could
be required to make under these guarantee agreements was
$54 million. Applied has not recorded any liability in
connection with these guarantee agreements beyond that required
to appropriately account for the underlying transaction being
guaranteed. Applied does not believe, based on historical
experience and information currently available, that it is
probable that any amounts will be required to be paid under
these guarantee agreements.
Applieds investment portfolio consists principally of
investment grade money market mutual funds, U.S. Treasury
and agency securities, municipal bonds, corporate bonds and
mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, as well as equity
securities. Applied regularly monitors the credit risk in its
investment portfolio and takes appropriate measures, which may
include the sale of certain securities, to manage such risks
prudently in accordance with its investment policies.
In fiscal 2010, as part of its regular investment review
process, Applied recorded impairment charges of $13 million
associated with equity investments in privately-held companies.
At October 31, 2010, Applied had a gross unrealized loss in
its investment portfolio of $1 million due to a decrease in
the fair value of certain fixed income securities. Applied
regularly reviews its investment portfolio to identify and
evaluate investments that have indications of possible
impairment. Factors considered in determining whether a loss is
temporary include: the length of time and extent to which fair
value has been lower than the cost basis; the financial
condition, credit quality and near-term prospects of the
investee; and whether it is more
likely-than-not
that Applied will be required to sell the security prior to any
anticipated recovery in fair value. Generally, the contractual
terms of the investments
46
do not permit settlement at prices less than the amortized cost
of the investments. While Applied cannot predict future market
conditions or market liquidity, Applied believes that its
investment policies provide an appropriate means to manage the
risks in its investment portfolio.
During fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, Applied recorded bad debt
provisions, net of recoveries, of $10 million and
$62 million, respectively, as a result of certain
customers deteriorating financial condition. While Applied
believes that its allowance for doubtful accounts at
October 31, 2010 is adequate, it will continue to closely
monitor customer liquidity and economic conditions.
Although cash requirements will fluctuate based on the timing
and extent of factors such as those discussed above,
Applieds management believes that cash generated from
operations, together with the liquidity provided by existing
cash balances and borrowing capability, will be sufficient to
satisfy Applieds liquidity requirements for the next
12 months. For further details regarding Applieds
operating, investing and financing activities, see the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in this report.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
During the ordinary course of business, Applied provides standby
letters of credit or other guarantee instruments to third
parties as required for certain transactions initiated either by
Applied or its subsidiaries. As of October 31, 2010, the
maximum potential amount of future payments that Applied could
be required to make under these guarantee agreements was
$54 million. Applied has not recorded any liability in
connection with these guarantee agreements beyond that required
to appropriately account for the underlying transaction being
guaranteed. Applied does not believe, based on historical
experience and information currently available, that it is
probable that any amounts will be required to be paid under
these guarantee agreements.
Applied also has operating leases for various facilities. Total
rental expense for operating leases was $52 million for
fiscal 2010, $64 million for fiscal 2009, and
$68 million for fiscal 2008.
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes Applieds contractual
obligations as of October 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Long-term debt obligations
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
Interest expense associated with long-term debt obligations
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Purchase obligations*
|
|
|
2,055
|
|
|
|
2,053
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,743
|
|
|
$
|
2,131
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents Applieds agreements to purchase goods and
services consisting of Applieds (a) outstanding
purchase orders for goods and services; and (b) contractual
requirements to make specified minimum payments even if Applied
does not take delivery of the contracted goods. |
In addition to the contractual obligations disclosed above, the
Company has certain tax obligations. Gross interest and
penalties and unrecognized tax benefits that are not expected to
result in payment or receipt of cash within one year have been
reported as non-current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance
Sheet. As of October 31, 2010, the gross liability for
unrecognized tax benefits was $328 million, exclusive of
interest and penalties. Increases or decreases to interest and
penalties on uncertain tax positions are included in provision
for income taxes in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions were
$6 million as of October 31, 2010 and $5 million
as of October 25, 2009. All $6 million in interest and
penalties is classified as long-term payable in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. At this time, the Company is unable to make a
47
reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of payments in
individual years due to uncertainties in the timing of tax audit
outcomes and, accordingly, such amounts are not included in the
above contractual obligation table.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the
amounts reported. Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements describes the significant accounting policies used in
the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
Certain of these significant accounting policies are considered
to be critical accounting policies.
A critical accounting policy is defined as one that is both
material to the presentation of Applieds consolidated
financial statements and that requires management to make
difficult, subjective or complex judgments that could have a
material effect on Applieds financial condition or results
of operations. Specifically, these policies have the following
attributes: (1) Applied is required to make assumptions
about matters that are highly uncertain at the time of the
estimate; and (2) different estimates Applied could
reasonably have used, or changes in the estimate that are
reasonably likely to occur, would have a material effect on
Applieds financial condition or results of operations.
Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects
cannot be determined with certainty. Applied bases its estimates
on historical experience and on various other assumptions
believed to be applicable and reasonable under the
circumstances. These estimates may change as new events occur,
as additional information is obtained and as Applieds
operating environment changes. These changes have historically
been minor and have been included in the consolidated financial
statements as soon as they became known. In addition, management
is periodically faced with uncertainties, the outcomes of which
are not within its control and will not be known for prolonged
periods of time. These uncertainties include those discussed in
Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors. Based on a
critical assessment of its accounting policies and the
underlying judgments and uncertainties affecting the application
of those policies, management believes that Applieds
consolidated financial statements are fairly stated in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, and provide a meaningful presentation
of Applieds financial condition and results of operations.
Management believes that the following are critical accounting
policies:
Revenue
Recognition
Applied recognizes revenue when all four revenue recognition
criteria have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;
sellers price to buyer is fixed or determinable; and
collectability is probable. Each sale arrangement may contain
commercial terms that differ from other arrangements. In
addition, Applied frequently enters into contracts that contain
multiple deliverables. Judgment is required to properly identify
the accounting units of the multiple deliverable transactions
and to determine the manner in which revenue should be allocated
among the accounting units. Moreover, judgment is used in
interpreting the commercial terms and determining when all
criteria of revenue recognition have been met in order for
revenue recognition to occur in the appropriate accounting
period. While changes in the allocation of the estimated sales
price between the units of accounting will not affect the amount
of total revenue recognized for a particular sales arrangement,
any material changes in these allocations could impact the
timing of revenue recognition, which could have a material
effect on Applieds financial condition and results of
operations.
In 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued amended
revenue recognition guidance for arrangements with multiple
deliverables and certain software sold with tangible products.
This new guidance eliminates the residual method of revenue
recognition and allows the use of managements best
estimate of selling price for individual elements of an
arrangement when vendor specific evidence or third party
evidence is unavailable. Applied implemented this guidance
prospectively beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 for
transactions that were initiated or materially modified during
fiscal 2010. The implementation of the new guidance had an
insignificant impact on reported net sales as compared to net
sales under previous guidance, as the new guidance did not
change the units of accounting within sales arrangements and the
elimination of the residual method for the allocation of
arrangement consideration had an inconsequential impact on the
amount and timing of reported net sales.
48
Warranty
Costs
Applied provides for the estimated cost of warranty when revenue
is recognized. Estimated warranty costs are determined by
analyzing specific product, current and historical configuration
statistics and regional warranty support costs. Applieds
warranty obligation is affected by product and component failure
rates, material usage and labor costs incurred in correcting
product failures during the warranty period. As Applieds
customer engineers and process support engineers are highly
trained and deployed globally, labor availability is a
significant factor in determining labor costs. The quantity and
availability of critical replacement parts is another
significant factor in estimating warranty costs. Unforeseen
component failures or exceptional component performance can also
result in changes to warranty costs. If actual warranty costs
differ substantially from Applieds estimates, revisions to
the estimated warranty liability would be required, which could
have a material adverse effect on Applieds business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
Applied maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for
estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers
to make required payments. This allowance is based on historical
experience, credit evaluations, specific customer collection
history and any customer-specific issues Applied has identified.
Changes in circumstances, such as an unexpected material adverse
change in a major customers ability to meet its financial
obligation to Applied or its payment trends, may require Applied
to further adjust its estimates of the recoverability of amounts
due to Applied, which could have a material adverse effect on
Applieds business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Inventory
Valuation
Inventories are generally stated at the lower of cost or market,
with cost determined on a
first-in,
first-out basis. The carrying value of inventory is reduced for
estimated obsolescence by the difference between its cost and
the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future
demand. Applied evaluates the inventory carrying value for
potential excess and obsolete inventory exposures by analyzing
historical and anticipated demand. In addition, inventories are
evaluated for potential obsolescence due to the effect of known
and anticipated engineering change orders and new products. If
actual demand were to be substantially lower than estimated,
additional adjustments for excess or obsolete inventory may be
required, which could have a material adverse effect on
Applieds business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
Applied reviews goodwill and intangible assets for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable, and also
annually reviews goodwill and intangibles with indefinite lives
for impairment. Intangible assets, such as purchased technology,
are generally recorded in connection with a business
acquisition. The value assigned to intangible assets is usually
based on estimates and judgments regarding expectations for the
success and life cycle of products and technology acquired. If
actual product acceptance differs significantly from the
estimates, Applied may be required to record an impairment
charge to reduce the carrying value of the reporting unit to its
realizable value. The fair value of a reporting unit is
estimated using both the income approach and the market approach
taking into account such factors as future anticipated operating
results and estimated cost of capital. Management uses
significant judgment when assessing goodwill for potential
impairment, especially in emerging markets. A severe decline in
market value could result in an unexpected impairment charge for
impaired goodwill, which could have a material adverse effect on
Applieds business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Income
Taxes
The effective tax rate is highly dependent upon the geographic
composition of worldwide earnings, tax regulations governing
each region, non-tax deductible expenses incurred in connection
with acquisitions and availability of tax credits. Management
carefully monitors the changes in many factors and adjusts the
effective income tax rate as required. If actual results differ
from these estimates, Applied could be required to record a
49
valuation allowance on deferred tax assets or adjust its
effective income tax rate, which could have a material adverse
effect on Applieds business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Applied accounts for income taxes by recognizing deferred tax
assets and liabilities using statutory tax rates for the effect
of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of
recorded assets and liabilities, net operating losses and tax
credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are also reduced by a
valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that a portion
of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Management has
determined that it is more likely than not that Applieds
future taxable income will be sufficient to realize its deferred
tax assets.
The calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment
in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the application of
complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner
inconsistent with Applieds expectations could have a
material impact on Applieds results of operations and
financial condition.
|
|
Item 7A:
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Applieds investment portfolio includes fixed-income
securities with a fair value of approximately $2.0 billion
at October 31, 2010. These securities are subject to
interest rate risk and will decline in value if interest rates
increase. Based on Applieds investment portfolio at
October 31, 2010, an immediate 100 basis point
increase in interest rates would result in a decrease in the
fair value of the portfolio of approximately $25 million.
While an increase in interest rates reduces the fair value of
the investment portfolio, Applied will not realize the losses in
the consolidated condensed statement of operations unless the
individual fixed-income securities are sold prior to recovery or
the loss is determined to be
other-than-temporary.
Certain operations of Applied are conducted in foreign
currencies, such as Japanese yen, euro, Israeli shekel,
Taiwanese dollar and Swiss franc. Applied enters into currency
forward exchange and option contracts to hedge a portion of, but
not all, existing and anticipated foreign currency denominated
transactions expected to occur within 24 months. Gains and
losses on these contracts are generally recognized in income at
the time that the related transactions being hedged are
recognized. Because the effect of movements in currency exchange
rates on currency forward exchange and option contracts
generally offsets the related effect on the underlying items
being hedged, these financial instruments are not expected to
subject Applied to risks that would otherwise result from
changes in currency exchange rates. Applied does not use
derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative
purposes. Net foreign currency gains and losses were not
material for fiscal 2010.
|
|
Item 8:
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
The consolidated financial statements required by this Item are
set forth on the pages indicated at Item 15(a).
|
|
Item 9:
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A:
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, management
of Applied conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and
with the participation of Applieds Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design
and operation of Applieds disclosure controls and
procedures, as such term is defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Based
upon that evaluation, Applieds Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that Applieds disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the
period covered by this report in ensuring that information
required to be disclosed was recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms, and to provide reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed by Applied in such reports
is accumulated and communicated to the Companys
management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
50
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Applieds management is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting,
as such term is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
of the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the
participation of Applieds Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, management of Applied conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of Applieds internal
control over financial reporting based upon the framework in
Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. Based on that evaluation, Applieds
management concluded that Applieds internal control over
financial reporting was effective as of October 31, 2010.
KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
audited the consolidated financial statements included in this
Form 10-K
and, as part of the audit, has issued a report, included herein,
on the effectiveness of Applieds internal control over
financial reporting as of October 31, 2010.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, there were no changes
in the internal control over financial reporting that materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
Applieds internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent
Limitations of Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal
Control over Financial Reporting
It should be noted that any system of controls, however well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system will be
met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in
part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future
events.
|
|
Item 9B:
|
Other
Information
|
None
51
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Applied Materials, Inc.:
We have audited Applied Materials, Inc.s (the Company)
internal control over financial reporting as of October 31,
2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control -
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The
Companys management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting in Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Companys internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Applied Materials, Inc. maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of October 31, 2010, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Applied Materials Inc. and
subsidiaries as of October 31, 2010 and October 25,
2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity and comprehensive income (loss), and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
October 31, 2010. In connection with our audits of the
consolidated financial statements, we have also audited the
financial statement schedule II. Our report dated
December 10, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule.
KPMG LLP
Mountain View, California
December 10, 2010
52
PART III
Pursuant to Paragraph G(3) of the General Instructions to
Form 10-K,
portions of the information required by Part III of
Form 10-K
are incorporated by reference from Applieds Proxy
Statement to be filed with the SEC in connection with the 2011
Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Proxy Statement).
|
|
Item 10:
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
(1) Information regarding directors, including director
nominations, and Applieds audit committee and audit
committee financial expert, appears in the Proxy Statement under
Election of Directors, and is incorporated herein by
reference.
(2) For information with respect to Executive Officers, see
Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
under Executive Officers of the Registrant.
(3) Information regarding Section 16(a) beneficial
ownership reporting compliance appears in the Proxy Statement
under Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Applied has implemented the Standards of Business Conduct, a
code of ethics with which every person who works for Applied and
every member of the Board of Directors is expected to comply. If
any substantive amendments are made to the Standards of Business
Conduct or any waiver is granted, including any implicit waiver,
from a provision of the code to Applieds Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer or Chief Accounting Officer,
Applied will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on
its website or in a report on
Form 8-K.
The above information, including the Standards of Business
Conduct, is available on Applieds website under the
Investors section at
http://investors.appliedmaterials.com.
This website address is intended to be an inactive, textual
reference only. None of the material on this website is part of
this report or is incorporated by reference herein.
|
|
Item 11:
|
Executive
Compensation
|
Information regarding executive compensation appears in the
Proxy Statement under Executive Compensation and Related
Information and is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding compensation committee interlocks and
insider participation appears in the Proxy Statement under
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation and is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding the compensation committee report appears
in the Proxy Statement under Human Resources and
Compensation Committee Report and is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
Item 12:
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
Information regarding the security ownership of certain
beneficial owners and management appears in the Proxy Statement,
under Principal Stockholders, and is incorporated
herein by reference.
53
The following table summarizes information with respect to
options and other equity awards under Applieds equity
compensation plans as of October 31, 2010:
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
Available for Future
|
|
|
|
Securities to be
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Issuance Under Equity
|
|
|
|
Issued Upon Exercise
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
of Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
|
|
Warrants and
|
|
|
Warrants and
|
|
|
Reflected in
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
Rights(1)
|
|
|
Rights(2)
|
|
|
Column(a))
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except prices)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
45,105
|
|
|
$
|
11.55
|
|
|
|
152,373
|
(3)
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
24,206
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
18.93
|
|
|
|
62,715
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
69,311
|
|
|
$
|
15.04
|
|
|
|
215,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes only options and restricted stock units (also referred
to as performance shares under the Applied
Materials, Inc. Employee Stock Incentive Plan) outstanding under
Applieds equity compensation plans, as no stock warrants
or other rights were outstanding as of October 31, 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
The weighted average exercise price calculation does not take
into account any restricted stock units as they have a de
minimis purchase price. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 54,071 thousand shares of Applied common stock
available for future issuance under the Applied Materials, Inc.
Employees Stock Purchase Plan. Of these
54,071 thousand shares, 1,932 thousand are subject to
purchase during the purchase period in effect as of
October 31, 2010. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes options to purchase 1,306 thousand shares of
Applied common stock assumed through various mergers and
acquisitions, after giving effect to the applicable exchange
ratios. The assumed options had a weighted average exercise
price of $13.80 per share. No further shares are available for
issuance under the plans under which these assumed awards were
granted. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes 5,315 thousand shares of Applied common stock
available for future issuance under the Applied Materials, Inc.
Stock Purchase Plan for Offshore Employees. Of these
5,315 thousand shares, 928 thousand are subject to
purchase during the purchase period in effect as of
October 31, 2010. |
Applied has the following equity compensation plans that have
not been approved by stockholders:
2000 Global Equity Incentive Plan The 2000 Global Equity
Incentive Plan (the 2000 Plan) was adopted effective as of
June 21, 2000. The 2000 Plan provides for the grant of
non-qualified stock options to employees other than officers and
directors. The administrator of the 2000 Plan (either the Board
of Directors of Applied or a committee appointed by the Board)
determines the terms and conditions of all stock options
granted; provided, however, that (1) the exercise price
generally may not be less than 100 percent of the fair
market value (on the date of grant) of the stock covered by the
option, and (2) the term of options can be no longer than
10 years (or 13 years in the event of death). A total
of 147,000,000 shares have been authorized for issuance
under the 2000 Plan, and 57,201,000 shares remain available
for issuance as of October 31, 2010.
Stock Purchase Plan for Offshore Employees The Stock
Purchase Plan for Offshore Employees (the Offshore ESPP) was
adopted effective as of October 16, 1995 for the benefit of
employees of Applieds participating affiliates (other than
United States citizens or residents). The Offshore ESPP provides
for the grant of options to purchase shares of Applied common
stock through payroll deductions pursuant to one or more
offerings. The administrator of the Offshore ESPP (the Board of
Directors of Applied or a committee appointed by the Board)
determines the terms and conditions of all options prior to the
start of an offering, including the purchase price of shares,
the number of shares covered by the option and when the option
may be exercised. All options granted as part of an offering
must be granted on the same date. Prior to December 7,
54
2009, a total of 15,800,000 shares had been authorized for
issuance under the Offshore ESPP. Effective December 7,
2009, Applied amended the Offshore ESPP to increase the number
of shares available for issuance under such plan by
5,000,000 shares and correspondingly amended the
stockholder-approved Applied Materials, Inc. Employees
Stock Purchase Plan (the U.S. ESPP) to reduce the number of
shares available for issuance under such plan by
5,000,000 shares. Accordingly, as of October 31, 2010
a total of 20,800,000 shares have been authorized for
issuance under the Offshore ESPP, and 5,315,000 shares
remain available for issuance. These plan amendments did not
result in any increase in the total aggregate number of shares
authorized for issuance under the Offshore ESPP and the
U.S. ESPP.
Nonemployee Director Share Purchase Plan The Applied
Materials, Inc. Nonemployee Director Share Purchase Plan was
adopted effective March 22, 2005. The Nonemployee Director
Share Purchase Plan provides a method by which non-employee
directors may purchase Applied common stock at 100% of fair
market value on the purchase date by foregoing cash they have
earned as retainer fees or meeting fees. The shares generally
are purchased at the same time the directors otherwise would
have been paid the fees in cash. Since the directors pay full
fair market value for the shares, there is no reserved amount of
shares under this plan and, accordingly, the table above does
not include any set number of shares available for future
issuance under the plan.
Applied Materials Profit Sharing Scheme The Applied
Materials Profit Sharing Scheme was adopted effective
July 3, 1996 to enable employees of Applied Materials
Ireland Limited and its participating subsidiaries to purchase
Applied common stock at 100% of fair market value on the
purchase date. Under this plan, eligible employees may elect to
forego a certain portion of their base salary and certain
bonuses they have earned and that otherwise would be payable in
cash to purchase shares of Applied common stock at full fair
market value. Since the eligible employees pay full fair market
value for the shares, there is no reserved amount of shares
under this plan and, accordingly, the table above does not
include any set number of shares available for future issuance
under the plan.
|
|
Item 13:
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
The information appearing in the Proxy Statement under the
heading Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions is incorporated herein by reference.
The information appearing in the Proxy Statement under the
heading Director Independence is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
Item 14:
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
Information regarding principal accounting fees and services and
the audit committees preapproval policies and procedures
appears in the Proxy Statement under the headings Fees
Paid to KPMG LLP and Policy on Audit
Committees Pre-Approval of Audit and Permisssible
Non-audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm, is incorporated herein by reference.
55
PART IV
|
|
Item 15:
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K:
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable
or the required information is shown in the Consolidated
Financial Statements or Notes thereto.
56
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
9,548,667
|
|
|
$
|
5,013,607
|
|
|
$
|
8,129,240
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
5,833,665
|
|
|
|
3,582,802
|
|
|
|
4,686,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
3,715,002
|
|
|
|
1,430,805
|
|
|
|
3,442,828
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research, development and engineering
|
|
|
1,143,521
|
|
|
|
934,115
|
|
|
|
1,104,122
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
535,820
|
|
|
|
406,946
|
|
|
|
505,762
|
|
Marketing and selling
|
|
|
406,028
|
|
|
|
327,572
|
|
|
|
459,402
|
|
Restructuring charges and asset impairments (Note 12)
|
|
|
245,925
|
|
|
|
155,788
|
|
|
|
39,948
|
|
Gain on sale of facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
2,331,294
|
|
|
|
1,824,421
|
|
|
|
2,087,397
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
1,383,708
|
|
|
|
(393,616
|
)
|
|
|
1,355,431
|
|
Pre-tax loss of equity-method investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,983
|
|
|
|
35,527
|
|
Impairments of investments and strategic investments
(Note 3)
|
|
|
12,665
|
|
|
|
84,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
21,507
|
|
|
|
21,304
|
|
|
|
20,506
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
37,430
|
|
|
|
48,580
|
|
|
|
109,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
1,386,966
|
|
|
|
(485,803
|
)
|
|
|
1,408,718
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
449,100
|
|
|
|
(180,476
|
)
|
|
|
447,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
937,866
|
|
|
$
|
(305,327
|
)
|
|
$
|
960,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
Weighted average number of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,339,949
|
|
|
|
1,333,091
|
|
|
|
1,354,176
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,348,804
|
|
|
|
1,333,091
|
|
|
|
1,374,507
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
57
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
October 25,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 3)
|
|
$
|
1,857,664
|
|
|
$
|
1,576,381
|
|
Short-term investments (Note 3)
|
|
|
726,918
|
|
|
|
638,349
|
|
Accounts receivable, net (Note 6)
|
|
|
1,831,006
|
|
|
|
1,041,495
|
|
Inventories (Note 7)
|
|
|
1,547,378
|
|
|
|
1,627,457
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net (Note 15)
|
|
|
512,944
|
|
|
|
356,336
|
|
Income taxes receivable (Note 15)
|
|
|
857
|
|
|
|
184,760
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
288,548
|
|
|
|
264,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
6,765,315
|
|
|
|
5,688,947
|
|
Long-term investments (Note 3)
|
|
|
1,307,283
|
|
|
|
1,052,165
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 7)
|
|
|
963,004
|
|
|
|
1,090,433
|
|
Goodwill, net (Note 8)
|
|
|
1,336,426
|
|
|
|
1,170,932
|
|
Purchased technology and other intangible assets, net
(Note 8)
|
|
|
286,821
|
|
|
|
306,416
|
|
Deferred income taxes and other assets (Note 15)
|
|
|
284,496
|
|
|
|
265,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
10,943,345
|
|
|
$
|
9,574,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,258
|
|
|
$
|
1,240
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (Note 7)
|
|
|
1,765,966
|
|
|
|
1,061,502
|
|
Customer deposits and deferred revenue (Note 7)
|
|
|
847,231
|
|
|
|
864,280
|
|
Income taxes payable (Note 15)
|
|
|
273,421
|
|
|
|
12,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,887,876
|
|
|
|
1,939,457
|
|
Long-term debt (Note 11)
|
|
|
204,271
|
|
|
|
200,654
|
|
Employee benefits and other liabilities (Note 14)
|
|
|
315,085
|
|
|
|
339,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,407,232
|
|
|
|
2,479,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity (Note 13):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock: $.01 par value per share;
1,000 shares authorized; no shares issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: $.01 par value per share;
2,500,000 shares authorized; 1,327,998 and
1,340,917 shares outstanding at 2010 and 2009, respectively
|
|
|
13,280
|
|
|
|
13,409
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
5,406,598
|
|
|
|
5,195,437
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
11,510,843
|
|
|
|
10,934,004
|
|
Treasury stock: 537,056 and 508,254 shares at 2010 and
2009, respectively, net
|
|
|
(9,396,274
|
)
|
|
|
(9,046,562
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
1,666
|
|
|
|
(1,680
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
7,536,113
|
|
|
|
7,094,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
10,943,345
|
|
|
$
|
9,574,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
58
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at October 28, 2007
|
|
|
1,385,711
|
|
|
$
|
13,857
|
|
|
$
|
4,658,832
|
|
|
$
|
10,863,291
|
|
|
|
434,686
|
|
|
$
|
(7,725,924
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,353
|
|
|
$
|
7,821,409
|
|
Components of comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
960,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
960,746
|
|
Change in unrealized net loss on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,739
|
)
|
|
|
(41,739
|
)
|
Change in unrealized net gain on derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,448
|
|
|
|
9,448
|
|
Change in defined benefit plan liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,440
|
)
|
|
|
(7,440
|
)
|
Change in retiree medical benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,866
|
|
|
|
1,866
|
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
922,823
|
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of interpretative tax guidance on
uncertainties in income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(322,749
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(322,749
|
)
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178,943
|
|
Issuance under stock plans, net of a tax detriment of $11,519
and other
|
|
|
28,213
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
258,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,617
|
)
|
|
|
90,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348,516
|
|
Common stock repurchases
|
|
|
(83,163
|
)
|
|
|
(832
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,163
|
|
|
|
(1,499,152
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,499,984
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 26, 2008
|
|
|
1,330,761
|
|
|
$
|
13,308
|
|
|
$
|
5,095,894
|
|
|
$
|
11,601,288
|
|
|
|
513,232
|
|
|
$
|
(9,134,962
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,570
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,548,958
|
|
Components of comprehensive loss, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(305,327
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(305,327
|
)
|
Change in unrealized net gain on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,956
|
|
|
|
44,956
|
|
Change in unrealized net gain on derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,729
|
)
|
|
|
(7,729
|
)
|
Change in defined benefit plan liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,492
|
)
|
|
|
(12,492
|
)
|
Change in retiree medical benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(719
|
)
|
|
|
(719
|
)
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(280,437
|
)
|
Change in measurement date to apply authoritative guidance on
defined benefit plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,942
|
)
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(320,117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(320,117
|
)
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,160
|
|
Issuance under stock plans, net of a tax detriment of $13,409
and other
|
|
|
12,098
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
(47,617
|
)
|
|
|
(39,898
|
)
|
|
|
(6,920
|
)
|
|
|
111,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,892
|
|
Common stock repurchases
|
|
|
(1,942
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,942
|
|
|
|
(22,886
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,906
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 25, 2009
|
|
|
1,340,917
|
|
|
$
|
13,409
|
|
|
$
|
5,195,437
|
|
|
$
|
10,934,004
|
|
|
|
508,254
|
|
|
$
|
(9,046,562
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,680
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,094,608
|
|
Components of comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
937,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
937,866
|
|
Change in unrealized net gain on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,410
|
|
|
|
4,410
|
|
Change in unrealized net gain on derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Change in defined benefit plan liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,698
|
)
|
|
|
(6,698
|
)
|
Change in retiree medical benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(284
|
)
|
|
|
(284
|
)
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,918
|
|
|
|
1,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
941,212
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(361,027
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(361,027
|
)
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,070
|
|
Issuance under stock plans, net of a tax detriment of $27,678
and other
|
|
|
15,883
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
85,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,250
|
|
Common stock repurchases
|
|
|
(28,802
|
)
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,802
|
|
|
|
(349,712
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(350,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,327,998
|
|
|
$
|
13,280
|
|
|
$
|
5,406,598
|
|
|
$
|
11,510,843
|
|
|
|
537,056
|
|
|
$
|
(9,396,274
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,666
|
|
|
$
|
7,536,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
59
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
937,866
|
|
|
$
|
(305,327
|
)
|
|
$
|
960,746
|
|
Adjustments required to reconcile net income (loss) to cash
provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
304,515
|
|
|
|
291,203
|
|
|
|
320,051
|
|
Loss on fixed asset retirements
|
|
|
20,034
|
|
|
|
24,017
|
|
|
|
6,826
|
|
Provision for bad debts
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
62,539
|
|
|
|
2,456
|
|
Restructuring charges and asset impairments
|
|
|
245,925
|
|
|
|
155,788
|
|
|
|
39,948
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(186,057
|
)
|
|
|
18,863
|
|
|
|
(58,259
|
)
|
Net recognized loss on investments
|
|
|
20,473
|
|
|
|
10,231
|
|
|
|
4,392
|
|
Pre-tax loss of equity method investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,983
|
|
|
|
35,527
|
|
Impairments of investments
|
|
|
12,665
|
|
|
|
84,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,491
|
)
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
126,070
|
|
|
|
147,160
|
|
|
|
178,943
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of amounts
acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(766,937
|
)
|
|
|
586,993
|
|
|
|
421,834
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
144,626
|
|
|
|
359,560
|
|
|
|
(638,256
|
)
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
183,903
|
|
|
|
(59,155
|
)
|
|
|
(125,605
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(4,590
|
)
|
|
|
94,740
|
|
|
|
94,247
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(6,690
|
)
|
|
|
(6,530
|
)
|
|
|
(394
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
469,049
|
|
|
|
(660,006
|
)
|
|
|
(260,041
|
)
|
Customer deposits and deferred revenue
|
|
|
(22,908
|
)
|
|
|
(361,455
|
)
|
|
|
622,645
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
261,909
|
|
|
|
(229,128
|
)
|
|
|
133,731
|
|
Employee benefits and other liabilities
|
|
|
(34,000
|
)
|
|
|
83,709
|
|
|
|
(20,832
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
1,722,853
|
|
|
|
332,665
|
|
|
|
1,710,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(169,081
|
)
|
|
|
(248,427
|
)
|
|
|
(287,906
|
)
|
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(322,599
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(235,324
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,210
|
|
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments
|
|
|
1,407,804
|
|
|
|
1,317,365
|
|
|
|
5,939,509
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(1,777,736
|
)
|
|
|
(956,249
|
)
|
|
|
(5,534,475
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(861,612
|
)
|
|
|
112,689
|
|
|
|
(75,986
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used for financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt repayments, net
|
|
|
(6,441
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(2,117
|
)
|
Proceeds from common stock issuances
|
|
|
128,832
|
|
|
|
61,824
|
|
|
|
393,978
|
|
Common stock repurchases
|
|
|
(350,000
|
)
|
|
|
(22,906
|
)
|
|
|
(1,499,984
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,491
|
|
Payments of dividends to stockholders
|
|
|
(348,522
|
)
|
|
|
(319,507
|
)
|
|
|
(325,405
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(576,131
|
)
|
|
|
(281,339
|
)
|
|
|
(1,426,037
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(3,827
|
)
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
281,283
|
|
|
|
164,757
|
|
|
|
208,902
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year
|
|
|
1,576,381
|
|
|
|
1,411,624
|
|
|
|
1,202,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of year
|
|
$
|
1,857,664
|
|
|
$
|
1,576,381
|
|
|
$
|
1,411,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments for income taxes
|
|
$
|
388,144
|
|
|
$
|
206,537
|
|
|
$
|
490,826
|
|
Cash refunds for income taxes
|
|
$
|
200,660
|
|
|
$
|
72,297
|
|
|
$
|
122,367
|
|
Cash payments for interest
|
|
$
|
14,485
|
|
|
$
|
14,372
|
|
|
$
|
14,580
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
60
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Note 1
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Principles
of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Applied Materials, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Applied or the
Company) after elimination of intercompany balances and
transactions. All references to a fiscal year apply to
Applieds fiscal year which ends on the last Sunday in
October. Fiscal 2010 contained 53 weeks, while fiscal 2009
and 2008 contained 52 weeks each. The first quarter of
fiscal 2010 contained 14 weeks, while the second, third,
and fourth quarters of fiscal 2010 contained 13 weeks. Each
fiscal quarter of 2009 and 2008 contained 13 weeks.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make judgments, estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ
materially from those estimates. On an ongoing basis, Applied
evaluates its estimates, including those related to accounts
receivable and sales allowances, fair values of financial
instruments, inventories, intangible assets and goodwill, useful
lives of intangible assets and property and equipment, fair
values of share-based awards, and income taxes, among others.
Applied bases its estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable,
the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities.
Cash
Equivalents
All highly-liquid investments with a remaining maturity of three
months or less at the time of purchase are considered to be cash
equivalents. Cash equivalents consists primarily of investments
in institutional money market funds.
Investments
All of Applieds investments are classified as
available-for-sale
at the respective balance sheet dates. Investments classified as
available-for-sale
are recorded at fair value based upon quoted market prices, and
any temporary difference between the cost and fair value of an
investment is presented as a separate component of accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss). The specific identification
method is used to determine the gains and losses on investments.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost
determined on a
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) basis. Applied adjusts inventory carrying value
for estimated obsolescence equal to the difference between the
cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon
assumptions about future demand and market conditions. Applied
fully reserves for inventories and noncancelable purchase orders
for inventory deemed obsolete. Applied performs periodic reviews
of inventory items to identify excess inventories on hand by
comparing on-hand balances to anticipated usage using recent
historical activity as well as anticipated or forecasted demand.
If estimates of customer demand diminish further or market
conditions become less favorable than those projected by
Applied, additional inventory adjustments may be required.
During fiscal 2010, Applied incurred inventory-related charges,
including $330 million associated with SunFab thin film
solar equipment.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is
provided over the estimated useful lives of the assets using the
straight-line method. Estimated useful lives for financial
reporting purposes are as follows:
61
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
buildings and improvements, 3 to 30 years; demonstration
and manufacturing equipment, 3 to 5 years; software, 3 to
5 years; and furniture, fixtures and other equipment, 3 to
15 years. Land improvements are amortized over the shorter
of 15 years or the estimated useful life. Leasehold
improvements are amortized over the shorter of five years or the
lease term.
Intangible
Assets
Goodwill and indefinite-lived assets are not amortized, but are
reviewed for impairment annually during the fourth quarter of
each fiscal year. Purchased technology and other intangible
assets are presented at cost, net of accumulated amortization,
and are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 1 to
15 years using the straight-line method.
Long-Lived
Assets
Applied reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
these assets may not be recoverable. Applied assesses these
assets for impairment based on estimated future cash flows from
these assets.
Business
Combinations
Effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied adopted
revised authoritative guidance on business combinations that
covers the measurement of acquirer shares issued as
consideration for a business combination, the recognition of
contingent consideration, the accounting for preacquisition gain
and loss contingencies, the recognition of capitalized
in-process research and development, the accounting for
acquisition-related restructuring cost accruals, the treatment
of acquisition-related transaction costs, and the recognition of
changes in the acquirers income tax valuation allowance.
This authoritative guidance also revised the accounting for both
increases and decreases in a parents controlling ownership
interest.
Research,
Development and Engineering Costs
Research, development and engineering costs are expensed as
incurred.
Sales and
Value Added Taxes
Taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental
authorities are presented on a net basis in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Income
Taxes
Income tax expense is based on pretax earnings. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected tax
consequences of temporary differences between the book and tax
bases of recorded assets and liabilities, net operating losses
and tax credit carryforwards.
Revenue
Recognition
Applied recognizes revenue when all four revenue recognition
criteria have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;
sellers price to buyer is fixed or determinable; and
collectability is probable. Applieds shipping terms are
customarily FOB Applied shipping point or equivalent terms.
Applieds revenue recognition policy generally results in
revenue recognition at the following points: (1) for all
transactions where legal title passes to the customer upon
shipment, Applied recognizes revenue upon shipment for all
products that have been demonstrated to meet product
specifications prior to shipment; the portion of revenue
associated with certain installation-related tasks is deferred,
and that revenue is recognized upon completion of the
installation-related tasks; (2) for products that have not
been demonstrated to meet product
62
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
specifications prior to shipment, revenue is recognized at
customer technical acceptance; (3) for transactions where
legal title does not pass at shipment, revenue is recognized
when legal title passes to the customer, which is generally at
customer technical acceptance; (4) for arrangements
initiated prior to fiscal 2010 containing multiple elements, the
revenue relating to the undelivered elements is deferred at
their estimated relative fair values until delivery of the
deferred elements; and (5) for arrangements initiated or
materially modified during fiscal 2010 containing multiple
elements, the revenue relating to the undelivered elements is
deferred using the relative selling price method utilizing
estimated sales prices until delivery of the deferred elements.
Applied limits the amount of revenue recognition for delivered
elements to the amount that is not contingent on the future
delivery of products or services, future performance obligations
or subject to customer-specified return or adjustment. In cases
where Applied has sold products that have been demonstrated to
meet product specifications prior to shipment, Applied believes
that at the time of delivery, it has an enforceable claim to
amounts recognized as revenue. The completed contract method is
used for
SunFabtm
thin film lines. Certain SunFab thin film contracts have
provisions for additional amounts to become due to Applied if
the line achieves certain output criteria subsequent to factory
acceptance. Any additional amounts earned under these contracts
are recognized upon achievement of such criteria. Spare parts
revenue is generally recognized upon shipment, and services
revenue is generally recognized over the period that the
services are provided.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied elected to early
adopt amended accounting standards issued by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) for multiple deliverable
revenue arrangements on a prospective basis for applicable
transactions originating or materially modified after
October 25, 2009. The new standard changes the requirements
for establishing separate units of accounting in a multiple
element arrangement and requires the allocation of arrangement
consideration to each deliverable to be based on the relative
selling price. The FASB also amended the accounting standards
for revenue recognition to exclude software that is contained in
a tangible product from the scope of software revenue guidance
when the software is essential to the tangible products
functionality. Implementation of this new authoritative guidance
had an insignificant impact on reported net sales as compared to
net sales under previous guidance, as the new guidance did not
change the units of accounting within sales arrangements and the
elimination of the residual method for the allocation of
arrangement consideration had an inconsequential impact on the
amount and timing of reported net sales.
For fiscal 2010 and future periods, when a sales arrangement
contains multiple elements, such as hardware and services
and/or
software products, Applied allocates revenue to each element
based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a
deliverable is based on its vendor specific objective evidence
(VSOE) if available, third party evidence (TPE) if VSOE is not
available, or estimated selling price (ESP) if neither VSOE nor
TPE is available. Applied generally utilizes the ESP due to the
nature of its products. In multiple element arrangements where
more-than-incidental
software deliverables are included, revenue is allocated to each
separate unit of accounting for each of the non-software
deliverables and to the software deliverables as a group using
the relative selling prices of each of the deliverables in the
arrangement based on the aforementioned selling price hierarchy.
If the arrangement contains more than one software deliverable,
the arrangement consideration allocated to the software
deliverables as a group is then allocated to each software
deliverable using the guidance for recognizing software revenue,
as amended.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
Applied uses financial instruments, such as forward exchange and
currency option contracts, to hedge a portion of, but not all,
existing and anticipated foreign currency denominated
transactions typically expected to occur within 24 months.
The terms of currency instruments used for hedging purposes are
generally consistent with the timing of the transactions being
hedged. The purpose of Applieds foreign currency
management is to mitigate the effect of exchange rate
fluctuations on certain foreign currency denominated revenues,
costs and eventual cash flows. All of Applieds derivative
financial instruments are recorded at fair value based upon
quoted market prices for comparable instruments. For derivative
instruments designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges of
63
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
anticipated foreign currency denominated transactions, the
effective portion of the gain or loss on these hedges is
reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) in stockholders equity, and is reclassified
into earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings. If
the transaction being hedged fails to occur, or if a portion of
any derivative is ineffective, the gain or loss on the
associated financial instrument is recorded promptly in
earnings. For derivative instruments used to hedge existing
foreign currency denominated assets or liabilities, the gain or
loss on these hedges is recorded promptly in earnings to offset
the changes in the fair value of the assets or liabilities being
hedged. Applied does not use derivative financial instruments
for trading or speculative purposes.
Foreign
Currency Translation
As of October 31, 2010, primarily all of Applieds
subsidiaries use the United States dollar as their functional
currency. Accordingly, assets and liabilities of these
subsidiaries are translated using exchange rates in effect at
the end of the period, except for non-monetary assets, such as
inventories and property, plant and equipment, which are
translated using historical exchange rates. Revenues and costs
are translated using average exchange rates for the period,
except for costs related to those balance sheet items that are
translated using historical exchange rates. The resulting
translation gains and losses are included in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations as incurred.
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject Applied to
significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of
cash equivalents, investments, trade accounts receivable and
derivative financial instruments used in hedging activities.
Applied invests in a variety of financial instruments, such as,
but not limited to, certificates of deposit, corporate and
municipal bonds, United States Treasury and agency securities,
and asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, and, by policy,
limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial
institution or commercial issuer. Applied performs ongoing
credit evaluations of its customers financial condition
and generally requires no collateral to secure accounts
receivable. Applied maintains an allowance reserve for
potentially uncollectible accounts receivable based on its
assessment of the collectibility of accounts receivable. Applied
regularly reviews the allowance by considering factors such as
historical experience, credit quality, age of the accounts
receivable balances, and current economic conditions that may
affect a customers ability to pay. In addition, Applied
utilizes letters of credit to mitigate credit risk when
considered appropriate. Applied is exposed to credit-related
losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to
derivative financial instruments, but does not expect any
counterparties to fail to meet their obligations.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2010, the FASB issued updated authoritative guidance
that amends the requirements for evaluating whether a decision
maker or service provider has a variable interest entity and
clarified that a quantitative approach should not be the sole
consideration in assessing the criteria for variable interest
entity determination. The guidance also clarifies that related
parties should be considered in applying all of the decision
maker and service provider criteria. This is in addition to the
authoritative guidance the FASB issued in June 2009 that applies
to determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity
and requiring an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine
whether the enterprises variable interest or interests
give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest
entity. Under this guidance, an enterprise has a controlling
financial interest when it has (1) the power to direct the
activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly
impact the entitys economic performance and (2) the
obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to
receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be
significant to the variable interest entity. The guidance also
requires an enterprise to assess whether it has an implicit
financial responsibility to ensure that a variable interest
entity operates as designed when determining whether it has
power to direct the activities of the variable interest entity
that most significantly impact the entitys economic
performance. The guidance also requires ongoing assessments of
whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity, requires enhanced disclosures, and eliminates
the scope exclusion for qualifying special-purpose
64
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
entities. This guidance is effective for Applied beginning in
the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The implementation of this
authoritative guidance is not expected to have a material impact
on Applieds financial position or results of operations.
In January 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for fair
value measurements, which requires additional disclosures and
clarifications to existing disclosures. This authoritative
guidance requires a reporting entity to disclose separately the
amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and
Level 2 fair value measurements and also to describe the
reasons for these transfers. This authoritative guidance also
requires enhanced disclosure of activity in Level 3 fair
value measurements. The new disclosures and clarifications of
existing disclosures for Level 1 and Level 2 fair
value measurements became effective for Applied in the second
quarter of fiscal 2010. Disclosures regarding activity within
Level 3 fair value measurements become effective the first
interim reporting period after December 15, 2010 and will
be effective for Applied in the second quarter of fiscal 2011.
Applied is evaluating the potential impact of the implementation
of this authoritative guidance on its consolidated financial
statements. See Note 4 for information and related
disclosures regarding Applieds fair value measurements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on variable
interest entities, which requires revised evaluations of whether
entities represent variable interest entities, ongoing
assessments of control over such entities, and additional
disclosures for variable interests. In December 2009, the FASB
issued authoritative guidance on the financial reporting by
entities involved with variable interest entities which amends
previously issued guidance on variable interest entities. The
amendments in this authoritative guidance replace the
quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining
which reporting entity, if any, has a controlling financial
interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused
on identifying which reporting entity has the power to direct
the activities of a variable interest entity that most
significantly impact the entitys economic performance and
(1) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or
(2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. This
authoritative guidance becomes effective for Applied in fiscal
2011. The implementation of this authoritative guidance is not
expected to have a material impact on Applieds financial
position or results of operations.
|
|
Note 2
|
Earnings
(Loss) Per Share
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share is determined using the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted earnings per share is determined using the weighted
average number of common shares and potential common shares
(representing the dilutive effect of stock options, restricted
stock units, and employee stock purchase plans shares)
outstanding during the period. Applieds net income (loss)
has not been adjusted for any period presented for purposes of
computing basic or diluted earnings (loss) per share due to the
Companys non-complex capital structure. For purposes of
computing diluted earnings per share, weighted average potential
common shares do not include stock options with an exercise
price greater than the average fair market value of Applied
common stock for the period as the effect would be
anti-dilutive. Potential common shares have not been included in
the calculation of diluted net loss per share for the fiscal
year ended October 25, 2009 as
65
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the effect would be anti-dilutive. As such, the numerator and
the denominator used in computing both basic and diluted net
loss per share for the fiscal year ended October 25, 2009
are the same.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
937,866
|
|
|
$
|
(305,327
|
)
|
|
$
|
960,746
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,339,949
|
|
|
|
1,333,091
|
|
|
|
1,354,176
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options, restricted stock units and
employee stock purchase plans shares
|
|
|
8,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
1,348,804
|
|
|
|
1,333,091
|
|
|
|
1,374,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
Potentially dilutive securities
|
|
|
33,706
|
|
|
|
85,049
|
|
|
|
36,423
|
|
|
|
Note 3
|
Cash,
Cash Equivalents and Investments
|
Summary
of Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments
The following tables summarizes Applieds cash, cash
equivalents and investments by security type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
October 31, 2010
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
700,467
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
700,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
1,138,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,138,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
18,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,157,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,157,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash and Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,857,664
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,857,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term and long-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
|
|
$
|
664,573
|
|
|
$
|
8,697
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
673,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
500,392
|
|
|
|
5,039
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
505,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes
|
|
|
501,686
|
|
|
|
6,611
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
508,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt securities*
|
|
|
261,335
|
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
263,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities
|
|
|
1,927,986
|
|
|
|
22,664
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
1,950,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publicly traded equity securities
|
|
|
9,119
|
|
|
|
16,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments in privately-held companies
|
|
|
58,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term and long-term investments
|
|
$
|
1,995,998
|
|
|
$
|
38,731
|
|
|
$
|
528
|
|
|
$
|
2,034,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash, Cash equivalents and Investments
|
|
$
|
3,853,662
|
|
|
$
|
38,731
|
|
|
$
|
528
|
|
|
$
|
3,891,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
October 25, 2009
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
341,127
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
341,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
1,235,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,235,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,235,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,235,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash and Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,576,381
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,576,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term and long-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
|
|
$
|
653,627
|
|
|
$
|
8,013
|
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
661,470
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
419,640
|
|
|
|
7,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427,237
|
|
U.S. commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes
|
|
|
382,550
|
|
|
|
5,676
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
387,945
|
|
Other debt securities*
|
|
|
103,193
|
|
|
|
1,430
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
104,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities
|
|
|
1,559,010
|
|
|
|
22,716
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
1,580,884
|
|
Publicly traded equity securities
|
|
|
9,572
|
|
|
|
9,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,011
|
|
Equity investments in privately-held companies
|
|
|
90,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term and long-term investments
|
|
$
|
1,659,201
|
|
|
$
|
32,155
|
|
|
$
|
842
|
|
|
$
|
1,690,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash, Cash equivalents and Investments
|
|
$
|
3,235,582
|
|
|
$
|
32,155
|
|
|
$
|
842
|
|
|
$
|
3,266,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Other debt securities consist primarily of investment grade
asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities. |
Maturities
of Investments
The following table summarizes the contractual maturities of
Applieds investments at October 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
699,095
|
|
|
$
|
701,494
|
|
Due after one through five years
|
|
|
964,098
|
|
|
|
981,459
|
|
Due after five years
|
|
|
3,457
|
|
|
|
3,899
|
|
No single maturity date**
|
|
|
329,348
|
|
|
|
347,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,995,998
|
|
|
$
|
2,034,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** |
|
Securities with no single maturity date include publicly-traded
and privately-held equity securities, and asset-backed and
mortgage-backed securities. |
67
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Gains and
Losses on Investments
Gross realized gains and losses on sales of investments during
fiscal 2010, 2009, and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Gross realized gains
|
|
$
|
6,184
|
|
|
$
|
8,666
|
|
|
$
|
13,483
|
|
Gross realized losses
|
|
$
|
1,622
|
|
|
$
|
10,486
|
|
|
$
|
14,690
|
|
At October 31, 2010, Applied had a gross unrealized loss of
$1 million due to a decrease in the fair value of certain
fixed income securities. Applied regularly reviews its
investment portfolio to identify and evaluate investments that
have indications of possible impairment. Factors considered in
determining whether an unrealized loss is temporary, or
other-than-temporary
and therefore impaired, include: the length of time and extent
to which fair value has been lower than the cost basis; the
financial condition, credit quality and near-term prospects of
the investee; and whether it is more likely than not that
Applied will be required to sell the security prior to recovery.
Generally, the contractual terms of investments in marketable
securities do not permit settlement at prices less than the
amortized cost of the investments. Applied has determined that
the gross unrealized losses on its marketable securities at
October 31, 2010 are temporary in nature and therefore it
did not recognize any impairment of its marketable securities
for fiscal 2010. During fiscal 2010, Applied determined that
certain of its equity investments in privately-held companies
were
other-than-temporarily
impaired and, accordingly, recognized impairment charges in the
amounts of $13 million. Impairment charges associated with
financial assets for fiscal 2009 totaled $84 million,
consisting of the following: equity method investment,
$45 million; publicly-traded equity securities,
$20 million; equity investments in privately-held
companies, $17 million; and marketable securities
$2 million. Applied did not recognize any impairment of its
financial assets for fiscal 2008.
The following table provides the fair market value of
Applieds investments with unrealized losses that are not
deemed to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired as of October 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Loss Position for
|
|
|
In Loss Position for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or Greater
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
|
|
$
|
37,742
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
7,543
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
45,285
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
66,024
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,024
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
U.S. commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes
|
|
|
54,127
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,127
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Other debt securities
|
|
|
56,113
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
1,624
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
57,737
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
214,006
|
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
|
$
|
9,167
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
223,173
|
|
|
$
|
528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains and temporary losses on investments classified
as
available-for-sale
are included within accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss), net of any related tax effect. Upon realization, those
amounts are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) to results of operations.
|
|
Note 4
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
Applieds financial assets are measured and recorded at
fair value, except for equity investments held in privately-held
companies. These equity investments are generally accounted for
under the cost method of accounting and are periodically
assessed for
other-than-temporary
impairment when events or circumstances indicate that an
other-than-temporary
decline in value may have occurred. Applieds nonfinancial
assets, such as
68
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
goodwill, intangible assets, and property, plant and equipment,
are recorded at cost and are assessed for impairment when events
or circumstances indicate that an
other-than-temporary
decline in value may have occurred.
Fair
Value Hierarchy
Applied uses the following fair value hierarchy, which
prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure
fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within
the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available
and significant to the fair value measurement:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities;
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Observable inputs other than
Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly,
such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted
prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are
observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities; and
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported
by little or no market activity and that are significant to the
fair value of the assets or liabilities.
|
Applieds investments are comprised primarily of debt
securities that are classified as
available-for-sale
and recorded at their fair values. In determining the fair value
of investments, Applied uses pricing information from pricing
services that value securities based on quoted market prices and
models that utilize observable market inputs. In the event a
fair value estimate is unavailable from a pricing service,
Applied generally obtains non-binding price quotes from brokers.
Applied then reviews the information provided by the pricing
services or brokers to determine the fair value of its
short-term and long-term investments. In addition, to validate
pricing information obtained from pricing services, Applied
periodically performs supplemental analysis on a sample of
securities. Applied reviews any significant unanticipated
differences identified through this analysis to determine the
appropriate fair value.
Investments with remaining effective maturities of
12 months or less from the balance sheet date are
classified as short-term investments. Investments with remaining
effective maturities of more than 12 months from the
balance sheet date are classified as long-term investments. As
of October 31, 2010, substantially all of Applieds
available-for-sale,
short-term and long-term investments were recognized at fair
value that was determined based upon observable inputs.
69
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Assets
and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring
Basis
Financial assets and liabilities (excluding cash balances)
measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below
as of October 31, 2010 and October 25, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2010
|
|
|
October 25, 2009
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
$
|
1,138,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,138,770
|
|
|
$
|
1,235,254
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,235,254
|
|
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
|
|
|
153,426
|
|
|
|
519,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
673,229
|
|
|
|
145,166
|
|
|
|
516,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
661,470
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
523,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
523,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427,237
|
|
U.S. commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387,945
|
|
Other debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,232
|
|
Publicly traded equity securities
|
|
|
25,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,186
|
|
|
|
19,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,011
|
|
Foreign exchange derivative assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,317,382
|
|
|
$
|
1,821,106
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,138,488
|
|
|
$
|
1,399,431
|
|
|
$
|
1,437,891
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,837,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,265
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,265
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,678
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,678
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,265
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,265
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,678
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,678
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no significant transfers in and out of Level 1
and Level 2 fair value measurements during the fiscal year
ended October 31, 2010. During the fiscal year ended
October 25, 2009, Level 3 assets consisted of
asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, the values of which
were based on non-binding, broker-provided price quotes and may
not have been corroborated by observable market data. The
following table presents the activity in Level 3
instruments during fiscal 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,100
|
|
Total realized and unrealized losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,856
|
)
|
Included in other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,152
|
)
|
Purchases, sales, and maturities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,606
|
)
|
Transfers out of Level 3, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(486
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring
Basis
Equity investments in privately-held companies are generally
accounted for under the cost method of accounting and are
periodically assessed for
other-than-temporary
impairment when an event or circumstance
70
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
indicates that an
other-than-temporary
decline in value may have occurred. If Applied determines that
an
other-than-temporary
impairment has occurred, the investment will be written down to
its estimated fair value based on available information, such as
pricing in recent rounds of financing, current cash positions,
earnings and cash flow forecasts, recent operational performance
and any other readily available market data. Equity investments
in privately-held companies totaled $59 million at
October 31, 2010, of which $40 million of investments
were accounted for under the cost method of accounting and
$19 million of investments had been measured at fair value
on a non-recurring basis due to an
other-than-temporary
decline in value. At October 25, 2009, equity investments
in privately-held companies totaled $91 million, of which
$52 million of investments were accounted for under the
cost method of accounting and $39 million of investments
had been measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis due to
an
other-than-temporary
decline in value.
The following tables present the balances of equity securities
at October 31, 2010 and October 25, 2009 that had been
measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, using the
process described above, and the impairment charges recorded
during the fiscal year then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Privately-Held
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments in privately-held companies measured at fair
value on a non-recurring basis during fiscal 2010
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,781
|
|
|
$
|
12,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Privately-Held
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments in privately-held companies measured at fair
value on a non-recurring basis during fiscal 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
39,250
|
|
|
$
|
17,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
The carrying amounts of Applieds financial instruments,
including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes
payable, and accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate
fair value due to the short maturities of these financial
instruments. At October 31, 2010, the carrying amount of
long-term debt was $206 million and the estimated fair
value was $238 million. At October 25, 2009, the
carrying amount of long-term debt was $202 million and the
estimated fair value was $216 million. The estimated fair
value of long-term debt is determined by Level 2 inputs and
is based primarily on quoted market prices for the same or
similar issues.
|
|
Note 5
|
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
|
Derivative
Financial Instruments
Applied conducts business in a number of foreign countries, with
certain transactions denominated in local currencies, such as
Japanese yen, euro, Israeli shekel, Taiwanese dollar and Swiss
franc. Applied uses derivative financial instruments, such as
forward exchange contracts and currency option contracts, to
hedge certain forecasted foreign currency denominated
transactions expected to occur typically within the next
24 months. The purpose of Applieds foreign currency
management is to mitigate the effect of exchange rate
fluctuations on certain foreign currency denominated revenues,
costs and eventual cash flows. The terms of currency instruments
used for hedging purposes are generally consistent with the
timing of the transactions being hedged. Applied does not use
derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative
purposes.
71
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Derivative instruments and hedging activities, including foreign
currency exchange contracts, are recognized on the balance sheet
at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that do
not qualify for hedge treatment, as well as the ineffective
portion of any hedges, are recognized currently in earnings. All
of Applieds derivative financial instruments are recorded
at their fair value in other current assets or in accounts
payable and accrued expenses.
Hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and
documented at the inception of the hedge as cash flow hedges and
are typically entered into once per month. Cash flow hedges are
evaluated for effectiveness quarterly. The effective portion of
the gain or loss on these hedges is reported as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income or loss (AOCI) in
stockholders equity and is reclassified into earnings when
the hedged transaction affects earnings. The majority of the
after-tax net income or loss related to derivative instruments
included in AOCI at October 31, 2010 is expected to be
reclassified into earnings within 12 months. Changes in the
fair value of currency forward exchange and option contracts due
to changes in time value are excluded from the assessment of
effectiveness. Both ineffective hedge amounts and hedge
components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are
recognized promptly in earnings. If the transaction being hedged
is no longer probable to occur, or if a portion of any
derivative is deemed to be ineffective, Applied promptly
recognizes the gain or loss on the associated financial
instrument in general and administrative expenses. The amount
recognized due to discontinuance of cash flow hedges that were
probable not to occur by the end of the originally specified
time period was not significant for fiscal 2010 or 2008. The
amount recognized due to discontinuance of cash flow hedges that
were probable not to occur by the end of the originally
specified time period was $25 million for fiscal 2009.
Additionally, forward exchange contracts are generally used to
hedge certain foreign currency denominated assets or
liabilities. These derivatives are typically entered into once
per month and are not designated for hedge accounting treatment.
Accordingly, changes in the fair value of these hedges are
recorded promptly in earnings to offset the changes in the fair
value of the assets or liabilities being hedged.
Fair values of derivative instruments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
October 25,
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
October 25,
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Location
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other current
assets
|
|
$
|
4,547
|
|
|
$
|
1,811
|
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
$
|
1,042
|
|
|
$
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other current
assets
|
|
$
|
1,436
|
|
|
$
|
362
|
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,983
|
|
|
$
|
2,173
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,265
|
|
|
$
|
1,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated
Condensed Statement of Operations for fiscal years ended
October 31, 2010 and October 25, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ineffective Portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ineffective Portion
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Amount Excluded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Amount Excluded
|
|
|
|
or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from Effectiveness
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from Effectiveness
|
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
Effective Portion
|
|
|
Testing
|
|
|
Effective Portion
|
|
|
Testing
|
|
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
or Recognized in
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
AOCI
|
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
in AOCI
|
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Cost of products
sold
|
|
$
|
616
|
|
|
$
|
(4,317
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,420
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,467
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,676
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,352
|
)
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
General and
administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,003
|
)
|
|
|
(1,686
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,511
|
)
|
|
|
23,582
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Research,
development and
engineering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
616
|
|
|
$
|
(5,647
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,106
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,467
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,514
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain or
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
in Income
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as
Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
General and
administrative
|
|
$
|
(19,590
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
(19,590
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative-related activity in accumulated other comprehensive
loss, net of taxes, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
310
|
|
|
$
|
8,039
|
|
Increase (decrease) in fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
1,849
|
|
|
|
(10,591
|
)
|
Loss reclassified into earnings, net
|
|
|
2,151
|
|
|
|
2,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain, net, on derivative instruments at end of year
|
|
$
|
4,310
|
|
|
$
|
310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
Risk Contingent Features
If Applieds credit rating were to fall below investment
grade, it would be in violation of credit risk contingent
provisions of the derivative instruments discussed above, and
certain counterparties to the derivative instruments could
request immediate payment on derivative instruments in net
liability positions. The aggregate fair value of all derivative
instruments with credit-risk related contingent features that
were in a net liability position was immaterial as of
October 31, 2010.
Entering into foreign exchange contracts with banks exposes
Applied to credit-related losses in the event of the banks
nonperformance. However, Applieds exposure is not
considered significant.
73
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 6
|
Accounts
Receivable, Net
|
Applied has agreements with various financial institutions to
sell accounts receivable and discount promissory notes from
selected customers. Applied also discounts letters of credit
through various financial institutions. Applied sells its
accounts receivable without recourse. Details of discounted
letters of credit, factored accounts receivable and discounted
promissory notes for fiscal years ended October 31, 2010,
October 25, 2009 and October 26, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Discounted letters of credit
|
|
$
|
229,803
|
|
|
$
|
299,401
|
|
|
$
|
167,110
|
|
Factored accounts receivable
|
|
|
153,079
|
|
|
|
38,868
|
|
|
|
132,788
|
|
Discounted promissory notes
|
|
|
3,458
|
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
|
|
5,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
386,340
|
|
|
$
|
341,819
|
|
|
$
|
305,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing charges on the sale of receivables and discounting of
letters of credit are included in interest expense in the
accompanying Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations and
were not material for all years presented.
Accounts receivable are presented net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $74 million at October 31, 2010 and
$67 million at October 25, 2009. Applied sells
principally to manufacturers within the semiconductor, display
and solar industries. As a result of challenging economic and
industry conditions, certain of these manufacturers may
experience difficulties in meeting their obligations in a timely
manner. While Applied believes that its allowance for doubtful
accounts is adequate and represents Applieds best estimate
at October 31, 2010, Applied will continue to closely
monitor customer liquidity and other economic conditions, which
may result in changes to Applieds estimates regarding
collectability.
|
|
Note 7
|
Balance
Sheet Detail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
October 25,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer service spares
|
|
$
|
323,693
|
|
|
$
|
263,688
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
260,591
|
|
|
|
351,824
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
499,931
|
|
|
|
667,484
|
|
Finished goods*
|
|
|
463,163
|
|
|
|
344,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,547,378
|
|
|
$
|
1,627,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Included in finished goods inventory is $148 million at
October 31, 2010, and $133 million at October 25,
2009, of newly-introduced systems at customer locations where
the sales transaction did not meet Applieds revenue
recognition criteria as set forth in Note 1. |
74
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
October 25,
|
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and improvements
|
|
|
|
$
|
227,202
|
|
|
$
|
228,057
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
3-30
|
|
|
1,233,850
|
|
|
|
1,164,384
|
|
Demonstration and manufacturing equipment
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
669,473
|
|
|
|
654,779
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and other equipment
|
|
3-15
|
|
|
719,119
|
|
|
|
713,505
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
|
|
19,144
|
|
|
|
146,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
2,868,788
|
|
|
|
2,906,957
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
(1,905,784
|
)
|
|
|
(1,816,524
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
963,004
|
|
|
$
|
1,090,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
$
|
657,971
|
|
|
$
|
477,148
|
|
Compensation and employee benefits
|
|
|
|
|
435,021
|
|
|
|
134,949
|
|
Warranty
|
|
|
|
|
155,242
|
|
|
|
117,537
|
|
Restructuring reserve
|
|
|
|
|
104,229
|
|
|
|
31,581
|
|
Other accrued taxes
|
|
|
|
|
98,634
|
|
|
|
36,954
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
|
|
92,960
|
|
|
|
80,455
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
221,909
|
|
|
|
182,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,765,966
|
|
|
$
|
1,061,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Deposits and Deferred Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
|
$
|
407,115
|
|
|
$
|
564,412
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
|
440,116
|
|
|
|
299,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
847,231
|
|
|
$
|
864,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2010, Applied incurred asset impairment charges of
$117 million primarily related to the restructuring of its
Energy and Environmental Solutions segment. As of
October 31, 2010, other accrued expenses included
$40 million in contractual termination obligation charges.
|
|
Note 8
|
Goodwill,
Purchased Technology and Other Intangible Assets
|
Goodwill
and Purchased Intangible Assets
Applieds methodology for allocating the purchase price
relating to purchase acquisitions is determined through
established and generally accepted valuation techniques.
Goodwill is measured as the excess of the cost of the
acquisition over the sum of the amounts assigned to tangible and
identifiable intangible assets acquired less liabilities
assumed. Applied assigns assets acquired (including goodwill)
and liabilities assumed to one or more reporting units as of the
date of acquisition. Typically, acquisitions relate to a single
reporting unit and thus do not require the allocation of
goodwill to multiple reporting units. If the products obtained
in an acquisition are assigned to multiple reporting units, the
goodwill is distributed to the respective reporting units as
part of the purchase price allocation process.
Goodwill and purchased intangible assets with indefinite useful
lives are not amortized, but are reviewed for impairment
annually during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. The process
of evaluating the potential
75
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
impairment of goodwill and intangible assets requires
significant judgment, especially in emerging markets. Applied
regularly monitors current business conditions and other factors
including, but not limited to, adverse industry or economic
trends, restructuring actions and lower projections of
profitability that may impact future operating results. For
goodwill, Applied performs a two-step impairment test. In the
first step, Applied compares the estimated fair value of each
reporting unit to its carrying value. Applieds reporting
units are consistent with the reportable segments identified in
Note 17, based on the manner in which Applied operates its
business and the nature of those operations. Applied determines
the fair value of each of its reporting units based on a
weighting of income and market approaches. Under the income
approach, Applied calculates the fair value of a reporting unit
based on the present value of estimated future cash flows.
Estimated future cash flows will be impacted by a number of
factors including anticipated future operating results,
estimated cost of capital
and/or
discount rates. Under the market approach, Applied estimates the
fair value based on market multiples of revenue or earnings for
comparable companies, as appropriate. If the fair value of the
reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets
assigned to that unit, goodwill is not impaired and no further
testing is performed. If the carrying value of the net assets
assigned to the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the
reporting unit, then Applied would perform the second step of
the impairment test in order to determine the implied fair value
of the reporting units goodwill. Applied would then
allocate the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the
assets and liabilities of that unit, as if Applied had acquired
the reporting unit in a business combination, with the fair
value of the reporting unit being the purchase
price. The excess of the purchase price over
the carrying amounts assigned to assets and liabilities
represents the implied fair value of goodwill. If Applied
determined that the carrying value of a reporting units
goodwill exceeded its implied fair value, Applied would record
an impairment equal to the difference.
Applied conducted impairment tests in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2010, and the results of the first step of the impairment
test indicated that Applieds goodwill and purchased
intangible assets with indefinite useful lives for each of its
reporting units were not impaired.
Details of indefinite-lived intangible assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2010
|
|
|
October 25, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silicon Systems Group
|
|
$
|
381,305
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
381,305
|
|
|
$
|
223,584
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
223,584
|
|
Applied Global Services
|
|
|
177,184
|
|
|
|
17,400
|
|
|
|
194,584
|
|
|
|
177,184
|
|
|
|
17,860
|
|
|
|
195,044
|
|
Display
|
|
|
115,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,908
|
|
|
|
115,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,908
|
|
Energy and Environmental Solutions
|
|
|
662,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
662,029
|
|
|
|
654,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
654,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount
|
|
$
|
1,336,426
|
|
|
$
|
17,400
|
|
|
$
|
1,353,826
|
|
|
$
|
1,170,932
|
|
|
$
|
17,860
|
|
|
$
|
1,188,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From October 25, 2009 to October 31, 2010, goodwill
increased by $158 million due to the acquisition of
Semitool, Inc. (Semitool), and by $7 million due to an
asset purchase from Advent Solar, Inc. (Advent Solar), both
during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 (see Note 9). Other
intangible assets that are not subject to amortization consist
primarily of a trade name.
Finite-Lived
Purchased Intangible Assets
Applied amortizes purchased intangible assets with finite lives
using the straight-line method over the estimated economic lives
of the assets, ranging from 1 to 15 years.
Applied evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value
of an asset group may not be recoverable. Applied assesses the
fair value of the assets based on the amount of the undiscounted
future cash flow that the assets are expected to generate and
recognizes an impairment
76
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
loss when estimated undiscounted future cash flow expected to
result from the use of the asset, plus net proceeds expected
from disposition of the asset, if any, are less than the
carrying value of the asset. When Applied identifies an
impairment, Applied reduces the carrying value of the group of
assets to comparable market values, when available and
appropriate, or to its estimated fair value based on a
discounted cash flow approach.
Intangible assets, such as purchased technology, are generally
recorded in connection with a business acquisition. The value
assigned to intangible assets is usually based on estimates and
judgments regarding expectations for the success and life cycle
of products and technology acquired. Applied evaluates the
useful lives of its intangible assets each reporting period to
determine whether events and circumstances require revising the
remaining period of amortization. In addition, Applied reviews
intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in
circumstances indicate their carrying value may not be
recoverable. Management considers such indicators as significant
differences in actual product acceptance from the estimates,
changes in the competitive and economic environment,
technological advances, and changes in cost structure.
Details of amortized intangible assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2010
|
|
|
October 25, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Silicon Systems Group
|
|
$
|
310,259
|
|
|
$
|
19,800
|
|
|
$
|
330,059
|
|
|
$
|
244,558
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
244,558
|
|
Applied Global Services
|
|
|
32,089
|
|
|
|
60,564
|
|
|
|
92,653
|
|
|
|
39,729
|
|
|
|
60,564
|
|
|
|
100,293
|
|
Display
|
|
|
109,828
|
|
|
|
33,500
|
|
|
|
143,328
|
|
|
|
109,828
|
|
|
|
33,500
|
|
|
|
143,328
|
|
Energy and Environmental Solutions
|
|
|
105,305
|
|
|
|
231,667
|
|
|
|
336,972
|
|
|
|
160,805
|
|
|
|
235,565
|
|
|
|
396,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount
|
|
$
|
557,481
|
|
|
$
|
345,531
|
|
|
$
|
903,012
|
|
|
$
|
554,920
|
|
|
$
|
329,629
|
|
|
$
|
884,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silicon Systems Group
|
|
$
|
(247,115
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,578
|
)
|
|
$
|
(252,693
|
)
|
|
$
|
(238,628
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(238,628
|
)
|
Applied Global Services
|
|
|
(19,022
|
)
|
|
|
(43,279
|
)
|
|
|
(62,301
|
)
|
|
|
(19,974
|
)
|
|
|
(38,635
|
)
|
|
|
(58,609
|
)
|
Display
|
|
|
(96,429
|
)
|
|
|
(22,258
|
)
|
|
|
(118,687
|
)
|
|
|
(91,364
|
)
|
|
|
(19,602
|
)
|
|
|
(110,966
|
)
|
Energy and Environmental Solutions
|
|
|
(36,690
|
)
|
|
|
(163,220
|
)
|
|
|
(199,910
|
)
|
|
|
(50,127
|
)
|
|
|
(137,663
|
)
|
|
|
(187,790
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
$
|
(399,256
|
)
|
|
$
|
(234,335
|
)
|
|
$
|
(633,591
|
)
|
|
$
|
(400,093
|
)
|
|
$
|
(195,900
|
)
|
|
$
|
(595,993
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount
|
|
$
|
158,225
|
|
|
$
|
111,196
|
|
|
$
|
269,421
|
|
|
$
|
154,827
|
|
|
$
|
133,729
|
|
|
$
|
288,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From October 25, 2009 to October 31, 2010, the change
in gross carrying amount of the amortized intangible assets was
approximately $18 million, primarily due the acquisition of
Semitool during the first quarter of fiscal 2010, offset by
impairment of intangible assets in connection with restructuring
of the Energy and Environmental Solutions segment in the third
quarter of fiscal 2010. Aggregate amortization expense was
$113 million, $89 million and $121 million for
fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
77
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of October 31, 2010, future estimated amortization
expense is expected to be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
52,787
|
|
2012
|
|
|
51,342
|
|
2013
|
|
|
48,633
|
|
2014
|
|
|
40,986
|
|
2015
|
|
|
24,897
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
50,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
269,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9
|
Business
Combinations
|
On December 21, 2009, Applied acquired Semitool, a public
company based in the state of Montana, for a purchase price of
$323 million in cash, net of cash acquired, pursuant to a
tender offer and subsequent short-form merger. The acquired
business is a leading supplier of electrochemical plating and
wafer surface preparation equipment used by semiconductor
packaging and manufacturing companies globally. Applieds
primary reasons for this acquisition were to complement its
existing product offerings and to provide opportunities for
future growth. The acquired business is included in results for
the Silicon Systems Group segment.
In November 2009, Applied acquired substantially all the assets,
including the intellectual property, of Advent Solar, a
developer of advanced technology for c-Si solar photovoltaic
cells and modules (PVs), for a purchase price of
$14 million. This acquisition complemented Applieds
portfolio of solar PV technologies and enhanced Applieds
opportunities in the c-Si equipment market. The acquisition is
included in results for the Energy and Environmental Solutions
segment.
Applied allocated the purchase price of each of these
acquisitions to tangible assets, liabilities and identifiable
intangible assets acquired, based on their estimated fair
values. The excess of purchase price over the aggregate fair
values was recorded as goodwill. The fair value assigned to
identifiable intangible assets acquired was based on estimates
and assumptions made by management. These estimates were
determined through established and generally accepted
calculation techniques. Applied calculated the fair value of the
tangible and intangible assets
78
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
acquired to allocate the purchase prices at the respective
acquisition dates. Based upon these calculations, the purchase
prices for the above acquisitions were allocated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
Fair Market Values
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
38,744
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
37,961
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
61,838
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
3,837
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
45,578
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
165,495
|
|
Purchased intangible assets
|
|
|
93,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
446,829
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(46,246
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(25,240
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(71,486
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price allocated
|
|
$
|
375,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
|
Useful
|
|
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
Life
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Developed technology
|
|
6 - 10
|
|
$
|
65,700
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
8
|
|
|
10,900
|
|
Trade names
|
|
3 - 10
|
|
|
5,700
|
|
Patents and trademarks
|
|
7 - 10
|
|
|
5,462
|
|
Backlog
|
|
1
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
Other
|
|
5
|
|
|
1,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchased intangible assets
|
|
|
|
$
|
93,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On January 31, 2008, Applied acquired all of the
outstanding shares of Baccini, a privately-held company based in
Italy, for a purchase price of $215 million in cash, net of
cash and marketable securities acquired. The acquired business
is a leading supplier of automated metallization and test
systems for manufacturing c-Si photovoltaic cells. In connection
with this acquisition, Applied recorded goodwill of
$158 million and intangible assets of $130 million. Of
the $130 million of acquired intangible assets,
$61 million was assigned to acquired backlog (to be
amortized over 2 years), $34 million was assigned to
customer relationships (to be amortized over 9 years),
$27 million was assigned to purchased technology (to be
amortized over 7 years), $6 million was assigned to
covenants not to compete (to be amortized over 2 years),
and $3 million was assigned to trademarks and tradenames
(to be amortized over 7 years). The allocation of the
purchase price was based on estimates of the fair value of the
assets acquired. The acquired business is reported under the
Energy and Environmental Solutions segment.
On November 9, 2007, Applied purchased from Edwards Vacuum,
Inc. certain assets of its Kachina semiconductor equipment parts
cleaning and refurbishment business for $19 million. The
acquisition expanded Applieds existing Chamber Performance
Services network of facilities that provide customers worldwide
with technology and support for maintaining their chamber
components. In connection with this acquisition, Applied
79
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
recorded goodwill of $13 million and an intangible asset of
$3 million (customer relationships, to be amortized over
13 years). The acquired business is reported under the
Applied Global Services segment.
For all of the purchase business combinations discussed above,
the results of operations prior to the acquisition dates were
not material in relation to those of Applied for any of the
periods presented herein. Goodwill is not amortized but is
reviewed periodically for impairment and purchased technology is
amortized over its useful life of 1 to 15 years.
|
|
Note 10
|
Borrowing
Facilities
|
Applied has credit facilities for unsecured borrowings in
various currencies of up to $1.1 billion, of which
$1.0 billion is comprised of a
5-year
revolving credit agreement with a group of banks that is
scheduled to expire in January 2012. This agreement provides for
borrowings in United States dollars at interest rates keyed to
one of the two rates selected by Applied for each advance and
includes financial and other covenants with which Applied was in
compliance at October 31, 2010. Remaining credit facilities
in the amount of approximately $98 million are with
Japanese banks. Applieds ability to borrow under these
facilities is subject to bank approval at the time of the
borrowing request, and any advances will be at rates indexed to
the banks prime reference rate denominated in Japanese
yen. No amounts were outstanding under any of these facilities
at October 31, 2010.
Long-term debt outstanding as of October 31, 2010 and
October 25, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
October 25,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
7.125% unsecured senior notes due 2017, interest payable April
15 and October 15
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
Other debt
|
|
|
5,529
|
|
|
|
1,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,529
|
|
|
|
201,894
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
(1,258
|
)
|
|
|
(1,240
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
204,271
|
|
|
$
|
200,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applied has debt agreements that contain financial and other
covenants. These covenants require Applied to maintain certain
minimum financial ratios. At October 31, 2010, Applied was
in compliance with all such covenants. Aggregate debt maturities
at October 31, 2010 were: $1 million in fiscal 2011,
$1 million in fiscal 2012, $1 million in fiscal 2013,
$1 million in fiscal 2014, and $201 million thereafter.
|
|
Note 12
|
Restructuring
Charges and Asset Impairments
|
The following table summarizes major components of the
restructuring and asset impairment charges during fiscal 2010,
2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Provision for restructuring reserves, severance
|
|
$
|
128,857
|
|
|
$
|
142,098
|
|
|
$
|
28,549
|
|
Provision for restructuring reserves, facilities
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(3,355
|
)
|
|
|
11,399
|
|
Asset impairments
|
|
|
116,990
|
|
|
|
17,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
245,925
|
|
|
$
|
155,788
|
|
|
$
|
39,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On July 21, 2010, Applied announced a plan to restructure
its Energy and Environmental Solutions segment, which is
expected to impact between 400 to 500 positions globally. The
plan was in response to adverse market
80
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
conditions for thin film solar, including delays in
utility-scale solar adoption, solar panel manufacturers
challenges in obtaining affordable capital, changes and
uncertainty in government renewable energy polices, and
competitive pressure from crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar
technologies. Under this plan, Applied incurred charges totaling
$403 million, which included inventory-related charges
included in cost of products sold of $247 million related
to SunFab thin film solar equipment, asset impairment charges of
$108 million, employee severance charges of
$45 million, and other costs of $3 million.
On November 11, 2009, Applied announced a restructuring
program to reduce its global workforce as of October 25,
2009 by approximately 1,300 to 1,500 positions, or 10 to
12 percent, over a period of 18 months. During the
first quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied recorded restructuring
charges of $104 million associated with this program.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, as a result of changes
in business requirements, Applied revised its global workforce
reduction to approximately 1,000 positions and recorded a
favorable adjustment of $20 million.
Changes in severance accruals associated with restructuring
reserves related to the programs described above for fiscal 2010
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Provision for restructuring reserves
|
|
$
|
148,855
|
|
Consumption of reserves
|
|
|
(35,655
|
)
|
Adjustment of restructuring reserves
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, October 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
93,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal 2009, Applied initiated a restructuring program to
reduce its global workforce by approximately 2,000 positions.
During fiscal 2009, Applied recognized restructuring and asset
impairment charges of $156 million, primarily consisting of
$143 million in restructuring charges associated with this
program and $15 million in asset impairments. The
restructuring charges consisted of employee-related costs to
reduce the Companys workforce through a combination of
attrition, voluntary separation and other workforce reduction
programs. During fiscal 2008, Applied recognized restructuring
charges of $40 million, of which $29 million was
associated with a global cost reduction plan announced in fiscal
2008, and $11 million with a plan announced in fiscal 2007.
81
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Changes in restructuring reserves for fiscal 2010, 2009, and
2008 related to other restructuring plans and facilities
realignment programs initiated in prior periods were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, October 28, 2007
|
|
$
|
9,739
|
|
|
|
13,454
|
|
|
$
|
23,193
|
|
Provision for restructuring reserves
|
|
|
38,670
|
|
|
|
11,399
|
|
|
|
50,069
|
|
Consumption of reserves
|
|
|
(32,174
|
)
|
|
|
(8,428
|
)
|
|
|
(40,602
|
)
|
Adjustment of restructuring reserves
|
|
|
(10,121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,121
|
)
|
Foreign currency changes
|
|
|
(412
|
)
|
|
|
(1,680
|
)
|
|
|
(2,092
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, October 26, 2008
|
|
|
5,702
|
|
|
|
14,745
|
|
|
|
20,447
|
|
Provision for restructuring reserves
|
|
|
144,901
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
145,015
|
|
Consumption of reserves
|
|
|
(121,265
|
)
|
|
|
(6,074
|
)
|
|
|
(127,339
|
)
|
Adjustment of restructuring reserves
|
|
|
(2,803
|
)
|
|
|
(3,469
|
)
|
|
|
(6,272
|
)
|
Foreign currency changes
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, October 25, 2009
|
|
|
26,353
|
|
|
|
5,228
|
|
|
|
31,581
|
|
Provision for restructuring reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
Consumption of reserves
|
|
|
(19,882
|
)
|
|
|
(459
|
)
|
|
|
(20,341
|
)
|
Adjustment of restructuring reserves
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
Foreign currency changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, October 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
6,473
|
|
|
$
|
4,556
|
|
|
$
|
11,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2010, Applied recorded asset impairment charges of
$108 million related to the restructuring of its Energy and
Environmental Solutions segment and of $9 million to write
down a facility to its estimated fair value based on prices for
comparable local properties. The facility was reclassified as an
asset held for sale within other current assets.
|
|
Note 13
|
Stockholders
Equity, Comprehensive Income and Share-Based
Compensation
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), on
an after-tax basis where applicable, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
October 25,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Pension liability
|
|
$
|
(38,862
|
)
|
|
$
|
(32,164
|
)
|
Retiree medical benefits
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
Unrealized gain on investments, net
|
|
|
24,382
|
|
|
|
19,972
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments qualifying as cash
flow hedges
|
|
|
4,310
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
|
12,105
|
|
|
|
10,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,666
|
|
|
$
|
(1,680
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For further details on derivative instruments, see Note 5
of the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
82
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock
Repurchase Program
On March 8, 2010, Applieds Board of Directors
approved a new stock repurchase program authorizing up to
$2.0 billion in repurchases over the next three years
ending in March 2013. Under this authorization, Applied renewed
its systematic stock repurchase program and may also make
supplemental stock repurchases from time to time, depending on
market conditions, stock price and other factors. In fiscal
2010, Applied repurchased 28,802,000 shares of its common
stock at an average price of $12.15 per share for a total cash
outlay of $350 million. In fiscal 2009, Applied repurchased
1,942,000 shares of its common stock at an average price of
$11.80 per share for a total cash outlay of $23 million. In
fiscal 2008, Applied repurchased 83,163,000 shares of its
common stock at an average price of $18.04 per share for a total
cash outlay of $1.5 billion.
Applied records treasury stock purchases under the cost method
using the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method. Upon reissuance of treasury stock,
amounts in excess of the acquisition cost are credited to
additional paid in capital. If Applied reissues treasury stock
at an amount below its acquisition cost and additional paid in
capital associated with prior treasury stock transactions is
insufficient to cover the difference between the acquisition
cost and the reissue price, this difference is recorded against
retained earnings. During fiscal 2009, shares of treasury stock
were issued in connection with Applieds ESPP at an
aggregate value that was less than the treasury stocks
acquisition price, resulting in $40 million being recorded
against retained earnings.
Dividends
During fiscal 2010, Applieds Board of Directors declared
three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $0.07 per share
and one quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $0.06 per
share. The fourth quarterly cash dividend of $0.07 per share
declared in fiscal 2010 will be paid on December 15, 2010
to stockholders of record as of November 24, 2010. During
fiscal 2009, Applieds Board of Directors declared four
quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $0.06 per share each.
During fiscal 2008, Applieds Board of Directors declared
four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $0.06 per share
each. Dividends declared during fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008
amounted to $361 million, $320 million and
$323 million, respectively. Applied currently anticipates
that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis
in the future, although the declaration and amount of any future
cash dividend are at the discretion of the Board of Directors
and will depend on Applieds financial condition, results
of operations, capital requirements, business conditions and
other factors, as well as a determination that cash dividends
are in the best interest of Applieds stockholders.
Share-Based
Compensation
Applied has adopted stock plans that permit grants to employees
of share-based awards, including stock options, restricted stock
and restricted stock units (also referred to as
performance shares under Applieds principal
equity compensation plan, the Employee Stock Incentive Plan). In
addition, the Employee Stock Incentive Plan provides for the
automatic grant of restricted stock units to non-employee
directors and permits the grant of equity-based awards to
consultants. Applied also has two Employee Stock Purchase Plans,
one for United States employees and a second for international
employees (collectively, ESPP), which enable eligible employees
to purchase Applied common stock.
During fiscal 2010, 2009, and 2008, Applied recognized
share-based compensation expense related to stock options, ESPP
shares, restricted stock units and restricted stock. Total
share-based compensation and related tax benefits were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
$
|
126,070
|
|
|
$
|
147,160
|
|
|
$
|
178,943
|
|
Tax benefit recognized
|
|
$
|
38,035
|
|
|
$
|
41,205
|
|
|
$
|
50,104
|
|
83
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The cost associated with equity awards that are subject solely
to time-based vesting requirements, less expected forfeitures,
is recognized over the awards service period for the
entire award on a straight-line basis. The cost associated with
performance-based equity awards is recognized for each tranche
over the service period, based on an assessment of the
achievement of performance goals.
At October 31, 2010, Applied had $180 million in total
unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures,
related to stock option, restricted stock unit and restricted
stock grants, which will be recognized over a weighted average
period of 2.4 years. Under the stock plans, there were
155,617,000 shares available for grant at October 31,
2010, 151,809,000 shares available for grant at
October 25, 2009, and 167,289,000 shares available for
grant at October 26, 2008.
Stock
Options
Applied grants options to purchase shares of its common stock to
employees and consultants, at future dates, at the fair market
value on the date of grant. Most options are scheduled to vest
over four years, and expire no later than seven years from the
grant date. The exercise price of each stock option equals the
fair market value of Applied common stock on the date of grant.
Most options are scheduled to vest over four years and expire no
later than seven years from the grant date. The fair value of
each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. This model was developed for
use in estimating the value of publicly traded options that have
no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable.
Applieds employee stock options have characteristics
significantly different from those of publicly traded options.
There were no stock options granted during fiscal 2010. The
weighted average assumptions used in the model for fiscal 2009
and 2008 are outlined in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Stock Options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
1.24
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
49.9
|
%
|
|
|
32.1
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.26
|
%
|
|
|
2.92
|
%
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
The computation of the expected volatility assumption used in
the Black-Scholes calculations for new grants is based on a
combination of historical and implied volatilities. When
establishing the expected life assumption, Applied periodically
reviews historical employee exercise behavior with respect to
option grants.
The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted
during fiscal 2009 and 2008 was $2.52 and $5.05, respectively.
Options outstanding had an aggregate intrinsic value of
$73 million, $109 million and $1 million at
October 31, 2010, October 25, 2009 and
October 26, 2008, respectively. The total grant date fair
value of options granted during fiscal 2009 and 2008 was
$62 million and $34,000, respectively. The total intrinsic
value of options exercised during fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 was
$15 million, $1 million and $54 million,
respectively. The total fair value of options that vested during
fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $21 million,
$14 million and $55 million, respectively. Cash
received from stock option exercises was $78 million,
$9 million and $328 million, respectively, during
fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008. The actual tax benefit realized for
the tax deductions from options exercised for fiscal 2010, 2009
and 2008 totaled $26 million, $22 million and
$57 million, respectively.
84
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock option activity for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, beginning of year
|
|
|
73,101
|
|
|
$
|
14.72
|
|
|
|
60,757
|
|
|
$
|
17.71
|
|
|
|
94,901
|
|
|
$
|
17.81
|
|
Granted and assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
24,514
|
|
|
$
|
8.58
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
19.38
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(7,149
|
)
|
|
$
|
10.88
|
|
|
|
(797
|
)
|
|
$
|
11.44
|
|
|
|
(19,004
|
)
|
|
$
|
17.27
|
|
Canceled and forfeited
|
|
|
(14,838
|
)
|
|
$
|
15.64
|
|
|
|
(11,373
|
)
|
|
$
|
17.73
|
|
|
|
(15,147
|
)
|
|
$
|
18.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of year
|
|
|
51,114
|
|
|
$
|
15.04
|
|
|
|
73,101
|
|
|
$
|
14.72
|
|
|
|
60,757
|
|
|
$
|
17.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, end of year
|
|
|
37,476
|
|
|
$
|
17.39
|
|
|
|
49,727
|
|
|
$
|
17.53
|
|
|
|
57,671
|
|
|
$
|
17.73
|
|
The following table summarizes information with respect to
options outstanding and exercisable at
October 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Range of
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
Exercise Prices
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
$0.01 $9.99
|
|
|
19,133
|
|
|
$
|
8.58
|
|
|
|
3.35
|
|
|
$
|
72,171
|
|
|
|
5,524
|
|
|
$
|
8.57
|
|
|
$
|
20,877
|
|
$10.00 $19.99
|
|
|
19,459
|
|
|
$
|
16.99
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
19,429
|
|
|
$
|
16.99
|
|
|
|
541
|
|
$20.00 $29.99
|
|
|
12,522
|
|
|
$
|
21.89
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,522
|
|
|
$
|
21.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,114
|
|
|
$
|
15.04
|
|
|
|
1.94
|
|
|
$
|
72,726
|
|
|
|
37,475
|
|
|
$
|
17.39
|
|
|
$
|
21,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable and expected to become exercisable
|
|
|
50,402
|
|
|
$
|
15.13
|
|
|
|
1.92
|
|
|
$
|
70,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
Stock Units and Restricted Stock
Restricted stock units are converted into shares of Applied
common stock upon vesting on a
one-for-one
basis. Restricted stock has the same rights as other issued and
outstanding shares of Applied common stock except these shares
have no right to dividends and are held in escrow until the
award vests. Restricted stock units and awards of restricted
stock typically vest over three to four years. Vesting of
restricted stock units and restricted stock usually is subject
to the grantees continued service with Applied and, in
some cases, achievement of specified performance goals. The
compensation expense related to these awards is determined using
the fair market value of Applied common stock on the date of the
grant, and the compensation expense is recognized over the
vesting period. Beginning in fiscal 2007, Applied initiated a
performance-based equity award program for named executive
officers and other key employees. Awards of restricted stock
units or restricted stock granted under this program vest only
if specific performance goals set by the Human Resources and
Compensation Committee of Applieds Board of Directors (the
Committee) are achieved and if the grantee remains employed by
Applied through the applicable vesting date. The performance
goals require the achievement of targeted relative annual
operating profit margin levels as compared to Applieds
peer companies in at least one of the four fiscal years
beginning with the fiscal year of the grant. The fair value of
these performance-based awards is estimated using the fair
market value of Applied common stock on the date of the grant
and assumes that the specified performance goals will be
achieved. If achieved, these awards vest over a specified
remaining service period. If the performance goals are not met,
no compensation expense is recognized and any previously
recognized compensation expense is reversed. The
85
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
expected cost of each award is reflected over the service period
and is reduced for estimated forfeitures. The Committee approved
the grant of 1,825,000 performance-based restricted stock units
and 50,000 performance-based shares of restricted stock under
this program for fiscal 2010. There were no performance-based
awards granted for fiscal 2009. The Committee approved the grant
of 1,565,000 performance-based restricted stock units and
100,000 performance-based shares of restricted stock under this
program for fiscal 2008. With respect to the performance-based
awards granted in fiscal 2010, as of October 31, 2010,
40 percent of the performance goals associated with these
awards had been achieved. The performance goals associated with
the remaining 60 percent may still be achieved during the
next three fiscal years. With respect to the performance-based
awards granted in fiscal 2008, as of October 31, 2010,
78 percent of the performance goals associated with these
awards had been achieved. The performance goals associated with
the remaining 22 percent may still be achieved during
fiscal 2011.
A summary of the changes in restricted stock units outstanding
under Applieds equity compensation plans during fiscal
2010, 2009 and 2008 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Non-vested restricted stock units and restricted stock at
October 25, 2009
|
|
|
12,105
|
|
|
$
|
16.16
|
|
|
|
2.4 Years
|
|
|
$
|
156,762
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
12,779
|
|
|
|
12.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(4,760
|
)
|
|
|
17.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(1,774
|
)
|
|
|
15.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested restricted stock units and restricted stock at
October 31, 2010
|
|
|
18,350
|
|
|
|
13.33
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
226,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested restricted stock units and restricted stock expected
to vest
|
|
|
16,143
|
|
|
|
13.42
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
199,364
|
|
Employee
Stock Purchase Plans
Under the ESPP, substantially all employees may purchase Applied
common stock through payroll deductions at a price equal to
85 percent of the lower of the fair market value of Applied
common stock at the beginning or end of each
6-month
purchase period, subject to certain limits. The number of shares
issued under the ESPP during fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 was
5,436,000 shares, 6,920,000 shares and
4,617,000 shares, respectively. At October 31, 2010,
there were 59,386,000 shares available for future issuance
under the ESPP. Based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model,
the weighted average estimated fair value of purchase rights
under the ESPP was $2.76 per share for the year ended
October 31, 2010, $3.19 per share for the year ended
October 25, 2009 and $4.97 per share for the year ended
October 26, 2008. Compensation expense is calculated using
the fair value of the employees purchase rights under the
Black-Scholes model. Underlying assumptions used in the model
for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 are outlined in the following
table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
ESPP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
2.44
|
%
|
|
|
2.37
|
%
|
|
|
1.21
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
33.3
|
%
|
|
|
58.8
|
%
|
|
|
29.9
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
|
|
0.33
|
%
|
|
|
4.16
|
%
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
86
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 14
|
Employee
Benefits Plans
|
Employee
Bonus Plans
Applied has various employee bonus plans. A discretionary bonus
plan provides for the distribution of a percentage of pre-tax
profits to Applied employees who are not eligible for other
performance-based incentive plans, up to a maximum percentage of
eligible compensation. Other plans provide for bonuses to
Applieds executives and other key contributors based on
the achievement of profitability
and/or other
specified performance criteria. Charges under these plans were
$320 million for fiscal 2010, no charges for fiscal 2009,
and $150 million for fiscal 2008.
Employee
Savings and Retirement Plan
Applieds Employee Savings and Retirement Plan (401(k)
Plan) is qualified under Sections 401(a) and (k) of
the Internal Revenue Code. Eligible employees may make salary
deferral and
catch-up
contributions under the 401(k) Plan on a pre-tax basis. Applied
matches a percentage of each participants salary deferral
contributions with cash contributions. Plan participants who
were employed by Applied or any of its affiliates on or after
January 1, 2010 became 100% vested in their Applied
matching contribution account balances. Participants may direct
that funds held in their 401(k) Plan accounts, including any
Applied matching contributions, be invested in any of the
diversified investment funds available under the 401(k) Plan or
within certain limits in the Applied Materials, Inc. Common
Stock Fund (Stock Fund), which invests solely in shares of
Applied common stock. The Stock Fund is a non-leveraged employee
stock ownership plan (within the meaning of
Section 4975(e)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code) and, as a
result, participants have the option of specifying that any
future cash dividends paid on shares held in the Stock Fund be
either reinvested in the Stock Fund or distributed directly to
them in cash no later than 90 days after the calendar year
for which the dividends were paid. Applieds matching
contributions under this plan were approximately
$25 million, net of $1 million in forfeitures, for
fiscal 2010; $24 million, net of $1 million in
forfeitures, for fiscal 2009; and $29 million, net of
$2 million in forfeitures, for fiscal 2008.
Defined
Benefit Pension Plans of Foreign Subsidiaries and Other
Post-Retirement Benefits
Several of Applieds foreign subsidiaries have defined
benefit pension plans covering substantially all of their
eligible employees. Benefits under these plans are typically
based on years of service and final average compensation levels.
The plans are managed in accordance with applicable local
statutes and practices. Applied deposits funds for certain of
these plans with insurance companies, pension trustees,
government-managed accounts,
and/or
accrues the expense for the unfunded portion of the benefit
obligation on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
Applieds practice is to fund the various pension plans in
amounts sufficient to meet the minimum requirements as
established by applicable local governmental oversight and
taxing authorities. Depending on the design of the plan, local
custom and market circumstances, the liabilities of a plan may
exceed qualified plan assets. The differences between the
aggregate projected benefit obligations and aggregate plan
assets of these plans have been recorded as liabilities by
Applied and are included in employee benefits and accrued
expenses in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In fiscal 2009,
Applied changed the measurement date for its defined and
postretirement benefit plan assets and obligations from an
interim date to Applieds fiscal year end.
Applied also has a post-retirement plan that provides certain
medical and vision benefits to eligible retirees who are at
least age 55 and who have at least 10 years of service
at their date of retirement. An eligible retiree also may elect
coverage for an eligible spouse or domestic partner who is not
eligible for Medicare. Coverage under the plan generally ends
for both the retiree and spouse or domestic partner upon
becoming eligible for Medicare. Applieds liability under
this post-retirement plan, which was included in other long-term
liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, was
$12 million at October 31, 2010 and $11 million
at October 25, 2009.
87
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of the changes in benefit obligations and plan assets,
which includes post-retirement benefits, for fiscal 2010 and
2009 is presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Change in projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
279,394
|
|
|
$
|
230,754
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
12,975
|
|
|
|
13,604
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
12,915
|
|
|
|
12,095
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
1,088
|
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
24,765
|
|
|
|
11,316
|
|
Curtailments, settlements and special termination benefits
|
|
|
(9,156
|
)
|
|
|
(5,842
|
)
|
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(6,588
|
)
|
|
|
21,789
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(6,050
|
)
|
|
|
(5,496
|
)
|
Plan amendments and business combinations
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
309,120
|
|
|
$
|
279,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
279,075
|
|
|
$
|
253,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of assumptions to determine benefit obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
1.5% - 5.6%
|
|
|
|
2.0% - 6.7%
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
2.0% - 5.0%
|
|
|
|
2.0% - 6.0%
|
|
Change in plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
109,607
|
|
|
$
|
97,578
|
|
Return on plan assets
|
|
|
7,569
|
|
|
|
2,608
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
60,798
|
|
|
|
14,996
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
1,088
|
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(2,864
|
)
|
|
|
5,642
|
|
Divestitures, settlements and business combinations
|
|
|
(7,967
|
)
|
|
|
(6,895
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(6,050
|
)
|
|
|
(5,496
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
162,181
|
|
|
$
|
109,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
$
|
(146,939
|
)
|
|
$
|
(169,787
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent asset
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
Current liability
|
|
|
(2,616
|
)
|
|
|
(2,048
|
)
|
Noncurrent liability
|
|
|
(144,323
|
)
|
|
|
(167,769
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(146,939
|
)
|
|
$
|
(169,787
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated amortization from accumulated other comprehensive
loss into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
2,119
|
|
|
$
|
1,145
|
|
Prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
Transition obligation
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,667
|
|
|
$
|
948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
47,996
|
|
|
$
|
27,580
|
|
Prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
(3,966
|
)
|
|
|
(1,943
|
)
|
Transition obligation
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
44,139
|
|
|
$
|
25,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
309,120
|
|
|
$
|
270,425
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
162,181
|
|
|
$
|
100,608
|
|
Plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
225,308
|
|
|
$
|
237,174
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
105,823
|
|
|
$
|
89,443
|
|
88
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Plan assets allocation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
The following table presents a summary of the ending fair value
of the plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
$
|
61,905
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
61,905
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
45,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,993
|
|
Insurance contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,077
|
|
|
|
44,077
|
|
Commingled funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,795
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
108,156
|
|
|
$
|
9,795
|
|
|
$
|
44,230
|
|
|
$
|
162,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the activity in Level 3
instruments during fiscal 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
11,308
|
|
Actual return on plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Relating to assets still held at reporting date
|
|
|
380
|
|
Purchases, sales, settlements, net
|
|
|
31,745
|
|
Actual return on transfers in and/or out of Level 3, net
|
|
|
|
|
Currency impact
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
$
|
44,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applieds investment strategy for its defined benefit plans
is to invest plan assets in a prudent manner, maintaining
well-diversified portfolios with the long-term objective of
meeting the obligations of the plans as they come due. Asset
allocation decisions are typically made by plan fiduciaries with
input from Applieds international pension oversight
committee. Applieds asset allocation strategy incorporates
a sufficient equity exposure in order for the plans to benefit
from the expected long-term outperformance of equities relative
to the plans liabilities. Applied retains investment
managers, where appropriate, to manage the assets of the plans.
Performance of investment managers is monitored by plan
fiduciaries with the assistance of local investment consultants.
The investment managers make investment decisions within the
guidelines set forth by plan fiduciaries. Risk management
practices include diversification across asset classes and
investment styles, and periodic rebalancing toward target asset
allocation ranges. Investment managers may use derivative
instruments for efficient portfolio management purposes. Plan
assets do not include any of Applieds own equity or debt
securities.
89
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of the components of net periodic benefit costs and
the weighted average assumptions used for net periodic benefit
cost and benefit obligation calculations for fiscal 2010, 2009
and 2008 is presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
12,975
|
|
|
$
|
13,604
|
|
|
$
|
15,546
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
12,915
|
|
|
|
12,095
|
|
|
|
13,409
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(7,181
|
)
|
|
|
(7,187
|
)
|
|
|
(8,583
|
)
|
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
Amortization of prior service costs (credit)
|
|
|
(303
|
)
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
231
|
|
Amortization of transition obligation
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
Settlement loss
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Curtailment gain
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(1,379
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
20,674
|
|
|
$
|
18,356
|
|
|
$
|
21,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
4.76%
|
|
|
|
5.00%
|
|
|
|
4.81%
|
|
Expected long-term return on assets
|
|
|
6.92%
|
|
|
|
7.43%
|
|
|
|
7.41%
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
3.30%
|
|
|
|
3.67%
|
|
|
|
3.31%
|
|
Asset return assumptions are derived based on actuarial and
statistical methodologies, from analysis of long-term historical
data relevant to the country in which each plan is in effect and
the investments applicable to the corresponding plan. The
discount rate for each plan was derived by reference to
appropriate benchmark yields on high quality corporate bonds,
allowing for the approximate duration of both plan obligations
and the relevant benchmark yields.
Future expected benefit payments for the pension plans and the
post-retirement plan over the next ten fiscal years are:
$10 million in fiscal 2011, $11 million in fiscal
2012, $11 million in fiscal 2013, $16 million in
fiscal 2014, $16 million in fiscal 2015, and
$94 million collectively for fiscal years 2016 through
2020. Company contributions to these plans for fiscal 2011 are
expected to be approximately $18 million.
Executive
Deferred Compensation Plans
Applied sponsors two unfunded deferred compensation plans, the
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (Predecessor EDCP) and the
2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (2005 EDCP), under
which certain employees may elect to defer a portion of their
following years eligible earnings. The Predecessor EDCP
was frozen as of December 31, 2004 such that no new
deferrals could be made under the plan after that date and the
plan would qualify for grandfather relief under
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The Predecessor
EDCP participant accounts continue to be maintained under the
plan and credited with deemed interest. The 2005 EDCP was
implemented by Applied effective as of January 1, 2005 and
is intended to comply with the requirements of Section 409A
of the Internal Revenue Code. Amounts payable, including accrued
deemed interest, totaled $66 million at October 31,
2010 and $77 million at October 25, 2009, which were
included in other long-term liabilities in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
90
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of income (loss) from operations before income
taxes for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
$
|
786,675
|
|
|
$
|
(555,456
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,021,961
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
600,291
|
|
|
|
69,653
|
|
|
|
386,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,386,966
|
|
|
$
|
(485,803
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,408,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes for
fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
$
|
463,119
|
|
|
$
|
(196,643
|
)
|
|
$
|
248,308
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
133,745
|
|
|
|
22,858
|
|
|
|
182,803
|
|
State
|
|
|
33,796
|
|
|
|
(36,683
|
)
|
|
|
5,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
630,660
|
|
|
|
(210,468
|
)
|
|
|
436,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
(160,396
|
)
|
|
|
25,351
|
|
|
|
61,469
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
4,537
|
|
|
|
10,347
|
|
|
|
(43,505
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
(25,701
|
)
|
|
|
(5,706
|
)
|
|
|
(6,417
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(181,560
|
)
|
|
|
29,992
|
|
|
|
11,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
449,100
|
|
|
$
|
(180,476
|
)
|
|
$
|
447,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation between the statutory U.S. federal income
tax rate of 35 percent and Applieds actual effective
income tax rate for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 is presented
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Tax provision (benefit) at U.S. statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Favorable resolutions from audits of prior years income
tax filings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign operations taxed at various rates
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Research and other tax credits
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
Export sales/production benefit
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
Equity method investment loss/impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.4
|
%
|
|
|
(37.2
|
)%
|
|
|
31.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. The components of deferred income
tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
October 25,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory reserves and basis difference
|
|
$
|
156,226
|
|
|
$
|
102,180
|
|
Installation and warranty reserves
|
|
|
38,832
|
|
|
|
44,802
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
307,289
|
|
|
|
178,414
|
|
Restructuring reserves
|
|
|
40,024
|
|
|
|
16,510
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
47,308
|
|
|
|
24,631
|
|
Capital loss carryforward
|
|
|
17,629
|
|
|
|
11,049
|
|
Tax credits and net operating losses
|
|
|
65,017
|
|
|
|
84,075
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
25,624
|
|
|
|
29,041
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
46,346
|
|
|
|
63,791
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
22,020
|
|
|
|
28,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
766,315
|
|
|
|
582,908
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(12,949
|
)
|
|
|
(11,049
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
753,366
|
|
|
|
571,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(43,064
|
)
|
|
|
(56,927
|
)
|
Purchased technology
|
|
|
(113,462
|
)
|
|
|
(98,717
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(48,984
|
)
|
|
|
(33,807
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(205,510
|
)
|
|
|
(189,451
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
547,856
|
|
|
$
|
382,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the breakdown between current and
non-current net deferred tax assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
October 25,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Current deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
512,944
|
|
|
$
|
356,336
|
|
Non-current deferred tax asset
|
|
|
112,147
|
|
|
|
98,271
|
|
Current deferred tax liability
|
|
|
(2,534
|
)
|
|
|
(3,487
|
)
|
Non-current deferred tax liability
|
|
|
(74,701
|
)
|
|
|
(68,712
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
547,856
|
|
|
$
|
382,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax liabilities are included in accounts
payable and accrued expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheets
and non-current deferred tax liabilities are included in
employee benefits and other liabilities on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
A valuation allowance is recorded to reflect the estimated
amount of deferred tax assets that may not be realized. The
valuation allowance has been established against capital loss
carryforwards where it is believed that it is not more likely
than not that sufficient capital gains will be realized within
the remaining carryforward period.
92
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
For fiscal 2010, U.S. income taxes have not been provided
for approximately $652 million of cumulative undistributed
earnings of several
non-U.S. subsidiaries.
Applied intends to reinvest these earnings indefinitely in
operations outside of the U.S. If these earnings were
distributed to the United States in the form of dividends or
otherwise, or if the shares of the relevant foreign subsidiaries
were sold or otherwise transferred, the Company would be subject
to additional U.S. income taxes (subject to an adjustment
for foreign tax credits) and foreign withholding taxes.
Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred income tax
liability related to these earnings is not practicable.
At October 31, 2010, Applieds state net operating
loss carryforwards were $55 million. The carryforwards
expire between fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2031. Applied has a
California research and development tax credit carryforward of
$31 million which has an unlimited life. Applied also has
net operating loss carryforwards in foreign jurisdictions of
$105 million. The carryforwards have lives ranging from
five years to indefinite. Management believes it is more likely
than not that all loss and tax credit carryforwards at
October 31, 2010 will be utilized in future periods.
Applieds income taxes payable have been reduced by the tax
benefits associated with employee stock option transactions.
These benefits, credited directly to stockholders equity,
amounted to $2 million for fiscal 2010, $1 million for
fiscal 2009, and $7 million for fiscal 2008 with a
corresponding reduction to taxes payable of $2 million in
fiscal 2010, $1 million in fiscal 2009, and $7 million
for fiscal 2008.
Applied maintains liabilities for uncertain tax positions. These
liabilities involve considerable judgment and estimation and are
continuously monitored by management based on the best
information available. A reconciliation of the beginning and
ending balances of the total amounts of gross unrecognized tax
benefits is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
$
|
325,300
|
|
|
$
|
363,400
|
|
Settlements with tax authorities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,400
|
)
|
Increases in tax positions for prior years
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Decreases in tax positions for prior years
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
(1,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
$
|
328,000
|
|
|
$
|
325,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31, 2010, Applied had unrecognized tax
benefits, net of federal deduction for state tax, of
$324 million, all of which, if recognized, would result in
a reduction of Applieds effective tax rate.
As of October 31, 2010, the gross liability for
unrecognized tax benefits was $328 million, exclusive of
interest and penalties. Increases or decreases to interest and
penalties on uncertain tax positions are included in provision
for income taxes in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions were
$6 million as of October 31, 2010 and $5 million
as of October 25, 2009. All $6 million in interest and
penalties is classified as a long-term liability in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. Long term income taxes payable has
been reduced by certain unrecognized tax benefits.
During fiscal 2010, Applied received a refund of
U.S. federal taxes of approximately $130 million due
to the carryback of the fiscal year 2009 net operating loss
to fiscal year 2005.
During fiscal 2009, the Internal Revenue Service began an
examination of Applieds federal income tax returns for
fiscal years 2007 and 2006. Applied believes it has adequately
reserved for any income tax uncertainties that may arise as a
result of this examination.
A number of Applieds tax returns remain subject to
examination by taxing authorities. These include
U.S. federal returns for fiscal 2004 and later years,
California returns for fiscal 2006 and later years, tax returns
for
93
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
certain other states for fiscal 2005 and later years, and tax
returns in certain jurisdictions outside of the United States
for fiscal 2003 and later years.
The timing of the resolution of income tax examinations, as well
as the amounts and timing of various tax payments that may be
part of the settlement process, is highly uncertain. This could
cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of
current assets and non-current assets and liabilities. Applied
does not expect a material change in unrecognized tax benefits
in the next 12 months.
|
|
Note 16
|
Warranty,
Guarantees and Contingencies
|
Leases
Applied leases some of its facilities and equipment under
non-cancelable operating leases and has options to renew most
leases, with rentals to be negotiated. Total rent expense was
$52 million for fiscal 2010, $64 million for fiscal
2009, and $68 million for fiscal 2008.
As of October 31, 2010, future minimum lease payments is
expected to be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease Payments
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
41,765
|
|
2012
|
|
|
28,924
|
|
2013
|
|
|
16,100
|
|
2014
|
|
|
14,211
|
|
2015
|
|
|
12,114
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
30,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
143,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty
Changes in the warranty reserves during fiscal 2010 and 2009
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
117,537
|
|
|
$
|
142,846
|
|
Provisions for warranty
|
|
|
151,915
|
|
|
|
92,976
|
|
Consumption of reserves
|
|
|
(114,210
|
)
|
|
|
(118,285
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
155,242
|
|
|
$
|
117,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applied products are generally sold with a
12-month
warranty period following installation. The provision for the
estimated cost of warranty is recorded when revenue is
recognized. Parts and labor are covered under the terms of the
warranty agreement. The warranty provision is based on
historical experience by product, configuration and geographic
region. Accordingly, current warranty provisions are related to
the current years net sales, and warranty consumption is
associated with current and prior years net sales.
Guarantees
During the ordinary course of business, Applied provides standby
letters of credit or other guarantee instruments to certain
parties as required for certain transactions initiated by either
Applied or its subsidiaries. As of October 31, 2010, the
maximum potential amount of future payments that Applied could
be required to make under these guarantee agreements was
approximately $54 million. Applied has not recorded any
liability in connection with these guarantee agreements below
that required to appropriately account for the underlying
94
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
transaction being guaranteed. Applied does not believe, based on
historical experience and information currently available, that
it is probable that any amounts will be required to be paid
under these guarantee agreements.
Applied also has agreements with various banks to facilitate
subsidiary banking operations worldwide, including overdraft
arrangements, issuance of bank guarantees, and letters of
credit. As of October 31, 2010, Applied Materials Inc. has
provided parent guarantees to banks for approximately
$181 million to cover these services.
Legal
Matters
Semitool
Shareholder Litigation
On November 17, 2009, Applied announced that it was making
a tender offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares of
Semitool in accordance with an Agreement and Plan of Merger
entered into with Semitool. Following this announcement, three
lawsuits were filed by Semitool shareholders in the District
Court of the Eleventh Judicial District Court for the State of
Montana, County of Flathead, against Semitool, Semitools
directors, Applied Materials, Inc. and Applieds
acquisition subsidiary. The actions sought certification of a
class of all holders of Semitool common stock, except the
defendants and their affiliates. The complaints alleged that
Semitools directors breached their fiduciary duties by,
among other things, failing to maximize shareholder value and
failing to disclose material information, and that Applied aided
and abetted such alleged breaches. The actions sought injunctive
relief, damages and attorneys fees.
On December 14, 2009, all parties in these cases reached an
agreement in principle to settle the matters and the plaintiffs
withdrew their motion to enjoin consummation of the transaction.
Without admitting any wrongdoing or fault, Semitool disclosed
certain additional information in its
Schedule 14D-9
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 14, 2009. Following the tender of shares
representing over 95 percent of the outstanding shares of
Semitool common stock, the merger of Semitool into
Applieds acquisition subsidiary was completed on
December 21, 2009. Pursuant to a memorandum of
understanding between the parties, plaintiffs conducted
discovery to confirm the fairness and reasonableness of the
settlement and defendants agreed not to object to an application
by plaintiffs counsel for an award of attorneys fees
and expenses in an amount up to $200,000. A class of
Semitools public shareholders is expected to be certified
solely for purposes of settlement, which, if approved by the
Court, will result in a complete and final discharge of all
claims on behalf of the class.
Jusung
Applied has been engaged in several lawsuits and patent and
administrative proceedings with Jusung Engineering Co., Ltd.
and/or
Jusung Pacific Co., Ltd. (Jusung) in Taiwan and South Korea
since 2003, and more recently in China, involving technology
used in manufacturing LCDs. Applied believes that it has
meritorious claims and defenses against Jusung that it intends
to pursue vigorously.
In 2004, Applied filed a complaint for patent infringement
against Jusung in the Hsinchu District Court in Taiwan seeking
damages and a permanent injunction for infringement of a patent
related to chemical vapor deposition (CVD) equipment, and
this case remains pending. Jusung unsuccessfully sought
invalidation of Applieds CVD patent in the Taiwanese
Intellectual Property Office (TIPO). In September 2010, the
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed Jusungs appeal of
the TIPOs decision. In 2009, Jusung filed a second action
with the TIPO seeking invalidation of Applieds CVD patent,
which remains pending.
In 2006, Applied filed an action in the TIPO challenging the
validity of a Jusung patent related to severability of the
transfer chamber on a CVD tool. Jusung sued Applied and AKT
America in Hsinchu District Court in Taiwan alleging
infringement of the same patent. In March 2009, the Hsinchu
District Court dismissed Jusungs lawsuit, and in October,
2010, the Taiwan Intellectual Property Court dismissed
Jusungs appeal. Separately, the TIPO granted
Applieds request for invalidation and also revoked
Jusungs patent. . In January 2010, the Taiwan Intellectual
Property Court granted Jusungs appeal of the TIPO decision
revoking its patent and remanded the
95
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
matter to the TIPO for reconsideration of validity. In November
2009, Applied filed an action in China with the Patent
Reexamination Board of the State Intellectual Property Office
seeking to invalidate this patent. On June 18, 2010, the
Patent Reexamination Board issued a decision invalidating
Jusungs patent in China. Jusung has appealed this decision.
In 2006, Jusung filed a complaint of private prosecution in the
Taipei District Court of Taiwan alleging that Applieds
outside counsel received from the Court and used a copy of an
expert report that Jusung had filed in the ongoing patent
infringement lawsuits that Jusung had intended to remain
confidential. The complaint names as defendants Applieds
outside counsel in Taiwan, as well as Michael R. Splinter,
Applieds Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer,
as the statutory representative of Applied. The Taipei District
Court dismissed the private prosecution complaint, and the
matter was transferred to the Taipei District Attorneys
Office. The Taipei District Attorneys Office issued four
successive rulings not to prosecute, each of which Jusung
appealed. In each instance, the Taiwan High Court District
Attorney returned the matter to the Taipei District
Attorneys Office for further consideration. In October
2010, the Taipei District Attorneys Office issued its
fifth ruling not to prosecute.
Korea
Criminal Proceedings
In February 2010, the Seoul Prosecutors Office for the
Eastern District of Korea (the Prosecutors Office)
indicted employees of several companies for the alleged improper
receipt and use of confidential information belonging to Samsung
Electronics Co., Ltd. (Samsung), a major Applied customer based
in Korea. The Prosecutors Office did not name Applied or
any of its subsidiaries as a party to the criminal action. The
individuals charged included the former head of Applied
Materials Korea (AMK), who at the time of the indictment was a
vice president of Applied Materials, Inc., and certain other AMK
employees. Hearings on these matters are ongoing in the Seoul
Eastern District Court. Applied and Samsung entered into a
settlement agreement effective as of November 1, 2010,
which resolves potential civil claims related to this matter and
which is separate from and does not affect the criminal
proceedings.
From time to time, Applied receives notification from third
parties, including customers and suppliers, seeking
indemnification, litigation support, payment of money or other
actions by Applied in connection with claims made against them.
In addition, from time to time, Applied receives notification
from third parties claiming that Applied may be or is infringing
or misusing their intellectual property or other rights. Applied
also is subject to various other legal proceedings and claims,
both asserted and unasserted, that arise in the ordinary course
of business.
Although the outcome of the above-described matters or these
claims and proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty,
Applied does not believe that any of these proceedings or other
claims will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated
financial condition or results of operations.
|
|
Note 17
|
Industry
Segment Operations
|
Applieds four reportable segments are: Silicon Systems
Group, Applied Global Services, Display, and Energy and
Environmental Solutions. Applieds chief operating
decision-maker has been identified as the President and Chief
Executive Officer, who reviews operating results to make
decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance
for the entire Company. Segment information is presented based
upon Applieds management organization structure as of
October 31, 2010 and the distinctive nature of each
segment. Future changes to this internal financial structure may
result in changes to the Companys reportable segments.
Each reportable segment is separately managed and has separate
financial results that are reviewed by Applieds chief
operating decision-maker. Each reportable segment contains
closely related products that are unique to the particular
segment. Segment operating income is determined based upon
internal performance measures used by Applieds chief
operating decision-maker.
Applied derives the segment results directly from its internal
management reporting system. The accounting policies Applied
uses to derive reportable segment results are substantially the
same as those used for external
96
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
reporting purposes. Effective in the first quarter of fiscal
2010, Applied changed its methodology for allocating certain
expenses to its reportable segments, such as components of
variable compensation and operating expenses associated with the
global sales organization. Applied has reclassified segment
operating results for fiscal 2009 and 2008 to conform to the
fiscal 2010 presentation. Management measures the performance of
each reportable segment based upon several metrics including
orders, net sales and operating income. Management uses these
results to evaluate the performance of, and to assign resources
to, each of the reportable segments. Applied does not allocate
to its reportable segments certain operating expenses that it
manages separately at the corporate level, which include costs
related to share-based compensation; certain management,
finance, legal, human resources, and research, development and
engineering functions provided at the corporate level; and
unabsorbed information technology and occupancy. In addition,
Applied does not allocate to its reportable segments
restructuring and asset impairment charges and any associated
adjustments related to restructuring actions, unless these
charges or adjustments pertain to a specific reportable segment.
Segment operating income excludes interest income/expense and
other financial charges and income taxes according to how a
particular reportable segments management is measured.
Management does not consider the unallocated costs in measuring
the performance of the reportable segments.
The Silicon Systems Group segment includes semiconductor capital
equipment for etch, rapid thermal processing, deposition,
chemical mechanical planarization, metrology and inspection, and
wafer packaging.
The Applied Global Services segment includes technically
differentiated products and services to improve operating
efficiency, reduce operating costs and lessen the environmental
impact of semiconductor, display and solar customers
factories. Applied Global Services products consist of
spares, services, certain earlier generation products, and
remanufactured equipment. Customer demand for these products and
services is fulfilled through a global distribution system with
trained service engineers located in close proximity to customer
sites.
The Display segment includes products for manufacturing LCDs for
TVs, personal computers and other video-enabled devices.
The Energy and Environmental Solutions segment includes products
for fabricating solar photovoltaic cells and modules, high
throughput
roll-to-roll
coating systems for flexible electronics and web products, and
systems used in the manufacture of energy-efficient glass.
97
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Information for each reportable segment as of October 31,
2010, October 25, 2009 and October 26, 2008 and for
the fiscal years then ended, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Depreciation/
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Expenditures
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silicon Systems Group
|
|
$
|
5,304,028
|
|
|
$
|
1,892,307
|
|
|
$
|
66,465
|
|
|
$
|
38,514
|
|
|
$
|
2,317,023
|
|
Applied Global Services
|
|
|
1,864,938
|
|
|
|
337,386
|
|
|
|
25,306
|
|
|
|
5,453
|
|
|
|
1,285,405
|
|
Display
|
|
|
898,998
|
|
|
|
267,495
|
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
|
|
4,534
|
|
|
|
418,874
|
|
Energy and Environmental Solutions
|
|
|
1,480,703
|
|
|
|
(466,124
|
)
|
|
|
56,717
|
|
|
|
41,412
|
|
|
|
1,401,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Segment
|
|
$
|
9,548,667
|
|
|
$
|
2,031,064
|
|
|
$
|
156,308
|
|
|
$
|
89,913
|
|
|
$
|
5,422,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silicon Systems Group
|
|
$
|
1,960,225
|
|
|
$
|
200,829
|
|
|
$
|
53,504
|
|
|
$
|
23,167
|
|
|
$
|
1,194,929
|
|
Applied Global Services
|
|
|
1,396,643
|
|
|
|
115,170
|
|
|
|
33,641
|
|
|
|
14,952
|
|
|
|
1,043,022
|
|
Display
|
|
|
501,692
|
|
|
|
51,226
|
|
|
|
11,924
|
|
|
|
14,428
|
|
|
|
444,619
|
|
Energy and Environmental Solutions
|
|
|
1,155,047
|
|
|
|
(234,259
|
)
|
|
|
80,095
|
|
|
|
51,320
|
|
|
|
1,853,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Segment
|
|
$
|
5,013,607
|
|
|
$
|
132,966
|
|
|
$
|
179,164
|
|
|
$
|
103,867
|
|
|
$
|
4,535,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silicon Systems Group
|
|
$
|
4,005,141
|
|
|
$
|
1,229,432
|
|
|
$
|
104,130
|
|
|
$
|
61,518
|
|
|
$
|
1,773,348
|
|
Applied Global Services
|
|
|
2,328,930
|
|
|
|
545,065
|
|
|
|
34,831
|
|
|
|
19,694
|
|
|
|
1,306,158
|
|
Display
|
|
|
975,582
|
|
|
|
300,607
|
|
|
|
8,397
|
|
|
|
11,478
|
|
|
|
658,744
|
|
Energy and Environmental Solutions
|
|
|
819,587
|
|
|
|
(206,211
|
)
|
|
|
106,663
|
|
|
|
7,544
|
|
|
|
2,075,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Segment
|
|
$
|
8,129,240
|
|
|
$
|
1,868,893
|
|
|
$
|
254,021
|
|
|
$
|
100,234
|
|
|
$
|
5,813,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliations of segment operating results to Applied
consolidated totals for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Total segment operating income
|
|
$
|
2,031,064
|
|
|
$
|
132,966
|
|
|
$
|
1,868,893
|
|
Corporate and unallocated costs
|
|
|
(554,427
|
)
|
|
|
(370,794
|
)
|
|
|
(495,351
|
)
|
Restructuring and asset impairment charges
|
|
|
(92,929
|
)
|
|
|
(155,788
|
)
|
|
|
(39,948
|
)
|
Gain on sale of facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
1,383,708
|
|
|
$
|
(393,616
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,355,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliations of depreciation and amortization expense to
Applied consolidated totals for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Total segment depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
156,308
|
|
|
$
|
179,164
|
|
|
$
|
254,021
|
|
Depreciation on shared facilities and information technology
assets
|
|
|
148,207
|
|
|
|
112,039
|
|
|
|
66,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
304,515
|
|
|
$
|
291,203
|
|
|
$
|
320,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Reconciliations of capital expenditures to Applied consolidated
totals for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Total segment capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
89,913
|
|
|
$
|
103,867
|
|
|
$
|
100,234
|
|
Shared facilities and information technology assets
|
|
|
79,168
|
|
|
|
144,560
|
|
|
|
187,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
169,081
|
|
|
$
|
248,427
|
|
|
$
|
287,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliations of segment assets to Applied consolidated totals
as of October 31, 2010, October 25, 2009 and
October 26, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
October 25,
|
|
|
October 26,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Total segment assets
|
|
$
|
5,422,936
|
|
|
$
|
4,535,853
|
|
|
$
|
5,813,766
|
|
Cash and investments
|
|
|
3,891,865
|
|
|
|
3,266,895
|
|
|
|
3,467,724
|
|
Allowance for bad debts
|
|
|
(73,940
|
)
|
|
|
(67,313
|
)
|
|
|
(5,275
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
625,091
|
|
|
|
454,607
|
|
|
|
502,534
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
92,736
|
|
|
|
337,015
|
|
|
|
382,912
|
|
Common property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
740,087
|
|
|
|
820,959
|
|
|
|
644,578
|
|
Equity-method investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,533
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
244,570
|
|
|
|
226,227
|
|
|
|
120,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets
|
|
$
|
10,943,345
|
|
|
$
|
9,574,243
|
|
|
$
|
11,006,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
For geographical reporting, revenue is attributed to the
geographic location in which the customers facilities are
located. Long-lived assets consist primarily of property, plant
and equipment and equity-method investments, and are attributed
to the geographic location in which they are located. Net sales
and long-lived assets by geographic region were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America(1)
|
|
$
|
1,147,186
|
|
|
$
|
714,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
2,749,448
|
|
|
|
32,200
|
|
Korea
|
|
|
1,767,860
|
|
|
|
4,747
|
|
China
|
|
|
1,556,900
|
|
|
|
77,813
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
981,396
|
|
|
|
94,792
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
767,503
|
|
|
|
5,494
|
|
Southeast Asia
|
|
|
578,374
|
|
|
|
65,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total outside North America
|
|
|
8,401,481
|
|
|
|
280,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total
|
|
$
|
9,548,667
|
|
|
$
|
994,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America(1)
|
|
$
|
965,603
|
|
|
$
|
803,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
1,025,823
|
|
|
|
32,939
|
|
Korea
|
|
|
663,813
|
|
|
|
4,624
|
|
China
|
|
|
635,371
|
|
|
|
97,707
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
752,635
|
|
|
|
115,280
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
718,573
|
|
|
|
7,611
|
|
Southeast Asia
|
|
|
251,789
|
|
|
|
57,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total outside North America
|
|
|
4,048,004
|
|
|
|
315,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total
|
|
$
|
5,013,607
|
|
|
$
|
1,118,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America(1)
|
|
$
|
1,519,898
|
|
|
$
|
895,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
1,837,097
|
|
|
|
43,169
|
|
Korea
|
|
|
1,309,490
|
|
|
|
6,258
|
|
China
|
|
|
779,853
|
|
|
|
37,166
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
949,105
|
|
|
|
109,224
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
1,217,635
|
|
|
|
89,782
|
|
Southeast Asia
|
|
|
516,162
|
|
|
|
16,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total outside North America
|
|
|
6,609,342
|
|
|
|
302,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total
|
|
$
|
8,129,240
|
|
|
$
|
1,198,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Primarily the United States. |
100
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following companies accounted for at least 10 percent
of Applieds net sales in fiscal 2010, 2009,
and/or 2008,
which were for products in multiple reportable segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Intel Corporation
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
*
|
|
As of October 31, 2010, accounts receivable for those
customers that accounted for at least 10% of Applieds net
sales in fiscal 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
On November 29, 2010, Applied entered into a Settlement
Agreement (the Agreement) with Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
(Samsung). The Agreement resolved potential civil claims and
removed the risk of civil litigation between the parties
relating to the alleged acquisition, misappropriation and misuse
of Samsung confidential semiconductor information in Korea that
is the subject of criminal proceedings pending against employees
of several companies, including current and former Applied
Materials Korea employees, in the Seoul Eastern District Court
of the Republic of Korea (the Korea proceedings). Neither
Applied nor any of its subsidiaries is a defendant in the Korea
proceedings. The settlement terms of the Agreement pertain to
potential civil claims between the parties and are separate from
and do not affect criminal proceedings against individual
defendants, including but not limited to the individuals charged
in the Korea proceedings.
Under the Agreement, which is generally effective for a
three-year period starting November 1, 2010, Applied will
provide volume-based rebates on purchases of semiconductor
products by Samsung and its affiliated companies. Applied also
will provide volume-based incentives related to Samsungs
use of Applied systems (i) for production of semiconductor
devices in applications for which Samsung has not previously
used Applied systems, and (ii) for joint development
activities. In addition, the Agreement includes volume-based
credits for certain upgrades, engineering services and spare
parts. The financial impact of the above rebates and incentives
on Applieds consolidated results of operations and
financial position will depend on the volume of purchases by
Samsung after the effective date of the Agreement.
101
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 19
|
Unaudited
Quarterly Consolidated Financial Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,848,902
|
|
|
$
|
2,295,540
|
|
|
$
|
2,517,790
|
|
|
$
|
2,886,435
|
|
|
$
|
9,548,667
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
711,184
|
|
|
$
|
926,892
|
|
|
$
|
860,128
|
|
|
$
|
1,216,798
|
|
|
$
|
3,715,002
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
82,751
|
|
|
$
|
264,004
|
|
|
$
|
123,096
|
|
|
$
|
468,015
|
|
|
$
|
937,866
|
|
Earnings per diluted share
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,333,396
|
|
|
$
|
1,020,077
|
|
|
$
|
1,133,740
|
|
|
$
|
1,526,394
|
|
|
$
|
5,013,607
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
391,576
|
|
|
$
|
155,519
|
|
|
$
|
324,874
|
|
|
$
|
558,836
|
|
|
$
|
1,430,805
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(132,934
|
)
|
|
$
|
(255,390
|
)
|
|
$
|
(54,865
|
)
|
|
$
|
137,862
|
|
|
$
|
(305,327
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per diluted share
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
102
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Applied Materials, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Applied Materials, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
October 31, 2010 and October 25, 2009, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity
and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended October 31, 2010. In
connection with our audits of the consolidated financial
statements, we also have audited the financial statement
schedule II. These consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Applied Materials, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
October 31, 2010 and October 25, 2009, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended October 31, 2010, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company adopted Accounting Standards
Topic 805, Business Combinations, during the year
ended October 31, 2010.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Applied Materials, Inc.s internal control over financial
reporting as of October 31, 2010, based on criteria
established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO), and our report dated December 10, 2010
expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
KPMG LLP
Mountain View, California
December 10, 2010
103
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
These Exhibits are numbered in accordance with the
Exhibit Table of Item 601 of
Regulation S-K:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated November 16, 2009,
among Applied Materials, Inc., Semitool Inc. and Jupiter
Acquisition Sub, Inc., incorporated by reference to
Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended January 31, 2010 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed March 9, 2010.
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Applied Materials, Inc., as
amended and restated through March 10, 2009, incorporated
by reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended April 26, 2009
(file no. 000-06920)
filed June 3, 2009.
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of the Terms
of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock dated
as of July 9, 1999, incorporated by reference to
Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended August 1, 1999 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed September 14, 1999.
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Bylaws of Applied Materials, Inc., as amended and restated
through December 8, 2008, incorporated by reference to
Applieds
Form 8-K
(file
no. 000-06920)
filed December 10, 2008.
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Form of Indenture (including form of debt security) between
Applied Materials, Inc. and Harris Trust Company of
California, as Trustee, incorporated by reference to
Applieds
Form 8-K
(file no. 000-06920)
filed August 17, 1994.
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
License Agreement dated January 1, 1992, between Applied
Materials and Varian Associates, Inc., incorporated by reference
to Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 1992 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed December 16, 1992.
|
|
10
|
.2*
|
|
Applied Materials, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as
amended and restated on April 1, 1995, incorporated by
reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended April 30, 1995
(file no. 000-06920)
filed June 7, 1995.
|
|
10
|
.3*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Applied Materials, Inc. Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to
Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended July 26, 1998 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed September 9, 1998.
|
|
10
|
.4*
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Applied Materials, Inc. Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to
Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended July 26, 1998 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed September 9, 1998.
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between Applied Materials,
Inc. and Non-Employee Directors, dated June 11, 1999,
incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 1999
(file no. 333-88777)
filed January 31, 2000.
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between Applied Materials,
Inc. and James C. Morgan and Dan Maydan, dated June 11,
1999, incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 1999 (file
no. 333-88777)
filed January 31, 2000.
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between Applied Materials,
Inc. and certain of its officers, incorporated by reference to
Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 1999 (file
no. 333-88777)
filed January 31, 2000.
|
|
10
|
.8*
|
|
Applied Materials, Inc. amended and restated 2000 Global Equity
Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2002 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed January 23, 2003.
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Applied Materials Profit Sharing Scheme, incorporated by
reference to Applieds
S-8
(file no. 333-45011)
filed January 27, 1998.
|
|
10
|
.10*
|
|
Term Sheet for employment of Michael R. Splinter, as amended and
restated December 8, 2008, incorporated by reference to
Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended January 25, 2009
(file no. 000-06920)
filed March 3, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Binding Memorandum of Understanding between Applied Materials,
Inc. and Novellus Systems, Inc. dated September 20, 2004,
incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 8-K
(file
no. 000-06920)
filed September 24, 2004. (Confidential treatment has been
granted for the redacted portions of the agreement.)
|
|
10
|
.12*
|
|
Applied Materials, Inc. Nonemployee Director Share Purchase
Plan, incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended May 1, 2005 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed May 31, 2005.
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.13*
|
|
Election Form to Receive Shares in lieu of Retainer and/or
Meeting Fees for use under the Applied Materials, Inc.
Nonemployee Director Share Purchase Plan, incorporated by
reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended May 1, 2005 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed May 31, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.14*
|
|
Applied Materials, Inc. amended and restated Relocation Policy,
incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 8-K
(file
no. 000-06920)
filed October 31, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.15*
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for use under the Applied
Materials, Inc. Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as amended,
incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2005
(file no. 000-06920)
filed December 14, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.16*
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Applied Materials, Inc. Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to
Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2005 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed December 14, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.17*
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to the Applied Materials, Inc. Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to
Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2005 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed December 14, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.18*
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Grant Agreement for use under
the Applied Materials Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as amended,
incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended July 30, 2006 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed August 31, 2006.
|
|
10
|
.19*
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Grant Agreement for use under
the Applied Materials, Inc. 2000 Global Equity Incentive Plan,
as amended, incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended July 30, 2006 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed August 31, 2006.
|
|
10
|
.20*
|
|
Form of Performance Shares Agreement for use under the
Applied Materials, Inc. Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as
amended, incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended July 30, 2006 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed August 31, 2006.
|
|
10
|
.21*
|
|
Applied Materials, Inc. amended and restated Employee Financial
Assistance Plan (as of December 18, 2008), incorporated by
reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended January 25, 2009
(file no. 000-06920)
filed March 3, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Master Confirmation dated September 18, 2006 between
Goldman, Sachs & Co. and Applied Materials, Inc.,
incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2006
(file no. 000-06920)
filed December 14, 2006. (Confidential treatment has been
granted for redacted portions of the agreement.)
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Supplemental Confirmation dated September 18, 2006 between
Goldman, Sachs & Co. and Applied Materials, Inc.,
incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2006 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed December 14, 2006. (Confidential treatment has been
granted for redacted portions of the agreement.)
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
$1,000,000,000 Credit Agreement dated as of January 26,
2007 among Applied Materials, Inc., as borrower, several lenders
named therein and Citicorp USA, Inc., as agent for the lenders,
incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended January 28, 2007 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed February 28, 2007. (Confidential treatment has been
granted for redacted portions of the agreement.)**
|
|
10
|
.25*
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Grant Agreement for use under
the Applied Materials, Inc. Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as
amended, incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended April 29, 2007 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed May 30, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.26*
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Grant Agreement for use under
the Applied Materials, Inc. 2000 Global Equity Incentive Plan,
as amended, incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended April 29, 2007 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed May 30, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.27*
|
|
Form of Performance Share Agreement for use under the Applied
Materials, Inc. Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as amended,
incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended April 29, 2007 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed May 30, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.28*
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for use under the Applied
Materials, Inc. Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as amended,
incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended April 29, 2007 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed May 30, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.29*
|
|
Applied Materials, Inc. amended and restated 2005 Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to
Applieds
Form 8-K
(file
no. 000-06920)
filed July 13, 2007.
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Share Purchase Agreement among Applied Materials, Inc., the
Shareholders of HCT Shaping Systems SA and Sellers
Representative dated June 25, 2007, incorporated by
reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended July 29, 2007 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed August 30, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.31*
|
|
Form of Performance Shares Agreement for use under the
Applied Materials, Inc. Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as
amended, incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2007
(file no. 000-06920)
filed December 14, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.32*
|
|
Form of Performance Shares Agreement for Nonemployee
Directors for use under the Applied Materials, Inc. Employee
Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to
Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2007 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed December 14, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.33*
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Grant Agreement for use under
the Applied Materials, Inc. Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as
amended, incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2007 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed December 14, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.34*
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for use under the Applied
Materials, Inc. Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as amended,
incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2007
(file no. 000-06920)
filed December 14, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.35*
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Grant Agreement for use under
the Applied Materials, Inc. 2000 Global Equity Incentive Plan,
as amended, incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2007 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed December 14, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
Share Purchase Agreement among Applied Materials, Inc. and the
Shareholders of Baccini S.p.A. dated November 18, 2007,
incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended January 27, 2008 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed March 3, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.37*
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for use under the Applied
Materials, Inc. Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as amended,
incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended July 27, 2008 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed August 29, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.38
|
|
Deed of Amendment to Applied Materials Profit Sharing Scheme,
dated February 7, 2006, to amend Clause 20 of the
Trust Deed thereunder, incorporated by reference to
Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2008 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed December 12, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.39
|
|
Deed of Amendment to Applied Materials Profit Sharing Scheme,
dated February 7, 2006, to amend the definition of Eligible
Employee in the First Schedule to the Trust Deed
thereunder, incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2008 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed December 12, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.40*
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to the Applied Materials, Inc. Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to
Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2008 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed December 12, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.41*
|
|
Amendment No. 6 to the Applied Materials, Inc. Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to
Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended January 25, 2009 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed March 3, 2009, incorporated by reference to
Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2008
(file no. 000-06920)
filed December 12, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.42*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Applied Materials, Inc. 2005
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference
to Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2008 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed December 12, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.43*
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Applied Materials, Inc. 2005
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference
to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended January 25, 2009
(file no. 000-06920)
filed March 3, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.44*
|
|
Applied Materials, Inc. amended and restated Employee Stock
Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2008 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed December 12, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.45*
|
|
Form of Performance Shares Agreement for use under the
Applied Materials, Inc. Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as
amended, incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2008
(file no. 000-06920)
filed December 12, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.46
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the U.S. $1,000,000,000 Credit Agreement
dated as of May 22, 2009 among Applied Materials, Inc., as
borrower, several lenders named therein and Citicorp USA, Inc.,
as agent for the lenders, incorporated by reference to
Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended July 26, 2009. (Confidential
treatment has been granted for redacted portions of the
agreement.)
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.47*
|
|
Form of Performance Shares Agreement for Nonemployee
Directors for use under the Applied Materials, Inc. Employee
Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to
Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended January 25, 2009 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed March 3, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.48*
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Employees for
use under the Applied Materials, Inc. Employee Stock Incentive
Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended January 25, 2009 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed March 3, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.49*
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for use under the
Applied Materials, Inc. 2000 Global Equity Incentive Plan, as
amended, incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended January 25, 2009 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed March 3, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.50*
|
|
Separation Agreement and Release between Applied Materials, Inc.
and Thomas M. St. Dennis dated October 5, 2009.,
incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2009
(file no. 000-06920)
file December 11, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.51*
|
|
Applied Materials, Inc. Stock Purchase Plan for Offshore
Employees, amended and restated effective December 7, 2009,
incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form S-8
(file
no. 333-165035)
filed February 23, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.52*
|
|
Applied Materials, Inc. Employees Stock Purchase Plan,
amended and restated effective February 23, 2010,
incorporated by reference to Applieds Post-Effective
Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on
Form S-8
(file
no. 333-143377)
filed February 23, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.53*
|
|
Amendment No. 7 to the Applied Materials, Inc. Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to
Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended May 2, 2010 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed June 9, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.54*
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Applied Materials, Inc. 2005
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference
to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended May 2, 2010
(file no. 000-06920)
filed June 9, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.55*
|
|
Amended and Restated Applied Materials, Inc. Senior Executive
Bonus Plan, incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended May 2, 2010 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed June 9, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.56*
|
|
Form of Performance Share Agreement for use under the Applied
Materials, Inc. Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as amended,
incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended May 2, 2010 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed June 9, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.57*
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for use under the Applied
Materials, Inc. Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as amended,
incorporated by reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended May 2, 2010 (file
no. 000-06920)
filed June 9, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.58*
|
|
Retirement Agreement and Release between Applied Materials, Inc.
and Franz Janker dated July 10, 2010, incorporated by
reference to Applieds
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended August 1, 2010
(file no. 000-06920)
filed September 3, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.59*
|
|
Amended and Restated Applied Materials, Inc. Applied Incentive
Plan.
|
|
21
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Applied Materials, Inc.
|
|
23
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, KPMG
LLP.
|
|
24
|
|
|
Power of Attorney.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
101
|
.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
101
|
.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
101
|
.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
101
|
.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or
arrangement, as required by Item 15(a)3. |
|
** |
|
Certain schedules and exhibits to this agreement, as set forth
in the Table of Contents of the agreement, have been omitted.
Applied Materials, Inc. hereby undertakes to furnish
supplementally copies of any of the omitted schedules and
exhibits upon request by the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
108
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ MICHAEL
R. SPLINTER
|
Michael R. Splinter
President, Chief Executive Officer
Dated: December 10, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MICHAEL
R. SPLINTER
Michael
R. Splinter
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
December 10, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ GEORGE
S. DAVIS
George
S. Davis
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
December 10, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ THOMAS
S. TIMKO
Thomas
S. Timko
|
|
Corporate Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
December 10, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Michael
R. Splinter
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
December 10, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Aart
J. de Geus
|
|
Director
|
|
December 10, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Stephen
R. Forrest
|
|
Director
|
|
December 10, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Thomas
J. Iannotti
|
|
Director
|
|
December 10, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan
M. James
|
|
Director
|
|
December 10, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Alexander
A. Karsner
|
|
Director
|
|
December 10, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Gerhard
H. Parker
|
|
Director
|
|
December 10, 2010
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Dennis
D. Powell
|
|
Director
|
|
December 10, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Willem
P. Roelandts
|
|
Director
|
|
December 10, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
James
E. Rogers
|
|
Director
|
|
December 10, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Robert
H. Swan
|
|
Director
|
|
December 10, 2010
|
Representing a majority of the members of the Board of
Directors.
|
|
|
* By
|
/s/
MICHAEL R. SPLINTER
|
|
Michael R. Splinter
Attorney-in-Fact**
|
|
|
** |
|
By authority of the power of attorney filed herewith. |
110
Schedule Of Valuation And Qualifying Accounts
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION
AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
ALLOWANCE
FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
Beginning of
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
Not Charged to
|
|
|
End of
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Combinations
|
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
67,313
|
|
|
$
|
17,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(7,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,873
|
)
|
|
$
|
73,940
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
5,275
|
|
|
$
|
62,539
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(501
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
67,313
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
4,136
|
|
|
$
|
2,456
|
|
|
$
|
501
|
|
|
$
|
(1,818
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,275
|
|
111