e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended
January 28, 2011
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
|
Commission file number: 0-17017
Dell Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
74-2487834
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
One Dell Way, Round Rock, Texas 78682
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
1-800-BUY-DELL
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(NASDAQ Global Select Market)
|
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act.
Yes o
No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer, and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o (Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Act).
Yes o
No þ
|
|
|
Approximate aggregate market value of the registrants
common stock held by non-affiliates as of July 30, 2010,
based upon the last sale price reported for such date on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market
|
|
$22.3 billion
|
Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of March 4, 2011
|
|
1,906,749,664
|
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The information required by Part III of this report, to the
extent not set forth herein, is incorporated by reference from
the registrants proxy statement relating to the annual
meeting of stockholders in 2011. Such proxy statement will be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within
120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this
report relates.
CAUTIONARY
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report includes forward-looking statements. The
words may, will, anticipate,
estimate, expect, intend,
plan, aim, seek and similar
expressions as they relate to us or our management are intended
to identify these forward-looking statements. All statements by
us regarding our expected financial position, revenues, cash
flows and other operating results, business strategy, legal
proceedings and similar matters are forward-looking statements.
Our expectations expressed or implied in these forward-looking
statements may not turn out to be correct. Our results could be
materially different from our expectations because of various
risks, including the risks discussed in this report under
Part I Item 1A Risk
Factors. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of
the date as of which such statement is made, and, except as
required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any
forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances,
including unanticipated events, after the date as of which such
statement was made.
PART I
All percentage amounts and ratios were calculated using
the underlying data in thousands. Unless otherwise noted, all
references to time periods refer to our fiscal years. Our fiscal
year is the 52 or 53 week period ending on the Friday
nearest January 31.
Unless the context indicates otherwise, references in this
report to we, us, our and
Dell mean Dell Inc. and our consolidated
subsidiaries.
General
Dell delivers innovative technology and services which customers
trust and value. As a leading technology company, we offer a
broad range of products and services that we believe create
optimal solutions for our customers that will provide them with
the power to do more.
Our company is a Delaware corporation and was founded in 1984 by
Michael Dell on a simple concept: by selling computer systems
directly to customers, we can best understand their needs and
efficiently provide the most effective computing solutions to
meet those needs. Over time we have expanded our business model
to include a broader portfolio of products and services, and we
have also added new distribution channels, such as retail,
system integrators, value-added resellers, and distributors,
which allow us to reach even more end-users around the world. We
have optimized our global supply chain to best serve our global
customer base, with a significant portion of our production
capabilities performed by contract manufacturers.
Dell Inc. is a holding company that conducts its business
worldwide through its subsidiaries. Our global corporate
headquarters is located in Round Rock, Texas. When we refer to
our company and its business in this report, we are referring to
the business and activities of our consolidated subsidiaries. We
operate principally in one industry, and we manage our business
in four global customer-oriented operating segments that we
identify as Large Enterprise, Public, Small and Medium Business,
and Consumer.
We are committed to managing and operating our business in a
responsible and sustainable manner around the globe. This
includes our commitment to environmental responsibility in all
areas of our business. See Government Regulation and
Sustainability below for additional information. This also
includes our focus on maintaining a strong control environment,
high ethical standards, and financial reporting integrity. See
Part II Item 9A Controls
and Procedures for a discussion of our internal control
over financial reporting.
Business
Strategy
Dell built its reputation as a leading technology provider
through listening to customers and developing solutions that
meet customer needs. We are focused on providing long-term value
creation through the delivery of customized solutions that make
technology more efficient, more accessible, and easier to use.
We will continue to focus on shifting our portfolio to
higher-margin and recurring revenue streams over time, improving
our core business, and maintaining a balance of liquidity,
profitability, and growth. We consistently focus on generating
strong cash flow returns, which allows us to expand our
capabilities and acquire new ones. We seek to grow revenue over
the long term while improving operating income and cash flow. In
accordance with our differentiated view of enterprise solutions,
we offer our customers open, capable, affordable, and integrated
solutions. We have three primary components to our strategy:
|
|
|
|
|
Providing Efficient Enterprise Solutions. We
are focused on expanding our enterprise solutions and services,
which include servers, networking, storage, and services. We
believe opportunities for data centers, servers and storage will
continue to expand and we are focused on providing these best
value, simplification, and more open data center solutions to
our customers. These are the kind of solutions that we believe
Dell is well positioned to provide. We believe that our
installed customer base, access to customers of all sizes, and
capabilities position us to achieve growth in our customer
solutions business. We will focus our investments to grow our
business organically as well as inorganically through alliances
and
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
strategic acquisitions. Our acquisition strategy will continue
to target opportunities that we believe will expand our business
by delivering best-value solutions for the enterprise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Creating a Flexible Value Chain and Accelerating Online
Leadership. We seek to profitably grow our
desktop and mobility business and enhance the online buying
experience for our customers. We have improved our
competitiveness through cost efficiency initiatives, which are
focused on improving design, supply chain, logistics, and
operating expenses to adjust to the changing dynamics of our
industry. We will continue our efforts to simplify our product
offerings to eliminate complexity that does not generate
customer value and focus on product leadership by developing
next generation capabilities. Additionally, we will continue to
deepen our skill sets and relationships within each of our
business units with the goal of delivering best in-class
products and services globally.
|
|
|
|
Balancing Liquidity, Profitability, and
Growth. We seek to maintain a strong balance
sheet with sufficient liquidity to provide us with the
flexibility to respond quickly to changes in our dynamic
industry. As we shift our portfolio focus more to enterprise
solutions and services, which we believe will improve our
profitability, our financial flexibility will allow us to make
longer term investments. We continue to manage all of our
businesses with the goals of delivering operating income over
the long term and balancing this profitability with an
appropriate level of long-term revenue growth.
|
By successfully executing our strategy and driving greater
efficiency and productivity in how we operate, we believe we can
help customers grow and thrive and create long-term value for
our shareholders.
Operating
Business Segments
All of our goals begin and end with the customer. Striving to
meet and exceed customer needs is at the heart of everything we
do. We believe our business segments allow us to serve our
customers with faster innovation and greater responsiveness, and
enable us to better understand and address their challenges. Our
four global business segments are:
|
|
|
|
|
Large Enterprise Our Large Enterprise
customers include large global and national corporate
businesses. We believe that a single large-enterprise unit
enhances our knowledge of our customers and improves our
advantage in delivering globally consistent and cost-effective
solutions and services to many of the worlds largest IT
users. We seek to continue improving our global leadership and
relationships with these customers. Our efforts in this segment
will be increasingly focused on delivering innovative products
and services through data center and cloud computing solutions.
|
|
|
|
Public Our Public customers, which include
educational institutions, government, health care, and law
enforcement agencies, operate in their own communities. Their
missions are aligned with their constituents needs. Our
customers measure their success against a common goal of
improving lives, and they require that their partners, vendors,
and suppliers understand their goals and help them achieve their
objectives. We intend to further our understanding of our Public
customers goals and missions and extend our leadership in
answering their urgent IT challenges. To meet our
customers goals more effectively, we are focusing on
simplifying IT, providing faster deployment of IT applications,
expanding our enterprise and services offerings, and
strengthening our partner relations to build best of breed
integrated solutions.
|
|
|
|
Small and Medium Business (SMB)
Our SMB segment is focused on helping small and medium-sized
businesses get the most out of their technology by offering
open, capable, and affordable solutions, innovative products,
and customizable services and solutions. As cloud computing and
workforce mobility become a routine part of a growing
businesss operations, server and storage virtualization
facilitate achievement of the organizations IT goals. Our
SMB segment continues to create and deliver SMB-specific
solutions so customers worldwide can take advantage of these
emerging technologies and grow their businesses.
|
|
|
|
Consumer Our Consumer segment is focused on
what customers want from the total technology experience of
entertainment, mobility, gaming, and design. Using insights from
listening to our customers around the world, we are designing
new, open, innovative products and experiences with fast
development cycles and competitive features. We will continue
our efforts to deliver high quality entertainment
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
capabilities, which represent the changing shape of computing
and next generation connectivity for the always-on
lifestyle, and innovations for a unified experience across the
entire portfolio of Dell Consumer products.
|
We also refer to our Large Enterprise, Public, and SMB segments
as Commercial. For financial information about the
results of our reportable operating segments for each of the
last three fiscal years, see Part II
Item 7 Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Results of Operations Segment
Discussion and Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements included in Part II
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.
Products
and Services
Our aim is to provide customers with integrated business
solutions. We design, develop, manufacture, market, sell, and
support a wide range of products and services that can be
customized to individual customer requirements. We also offer or
arrange various customer financial services for our business and
consumer customers in the U.S.
Enterprise
Solutions and Services
Enterprise solutions includes our servers, networking, and
storage products.
|
|
|
|
|
Servers and Networking Our standards-based
PowerEdge line of servers is designed to offer customers
affordable performance, reliability, and scalability. Options
include high performance rack, blade, and tower servers for
enterprise customers and value tower servers for small
organizations, networks, and remote offices. We also offer
customized Dell server solutions for large data center
customers. During Fiscal 2011, we expanded our PowerEdge rack
servers and PowerEdge C cloud offerings. We also expanded our
networking product offerings and introduced our PowerConnect
J-series. These products serve as part of our mission to help
companies of all sizes simplify their IT environments.
|
Storage We offer a comprehensive portfolio of
Dell-branded and third-party advanced storage solutions,
including storage area networks, network-attached storage,
direct-attached storage, disk and tape backup systems, and
removable disk backup. With our advanced storage solutions for
mainstream buyers, we offer customers functionality and value
while reducing complexity in the enterprise. Our storage systems
are easy to deploy, manage, and maintain. The flexibility and
scalability offered by our Dell PowerVault and Dell EqualLogic
(EqualLogic) storage systems help organizations
optimize storage for diverse environments with varied
requirements. During Fiscal 2011, we expanded our storage
portfolio by adding a variety of increasingly flexible new Dell
PowerVault, Dell EqualLogic, and Dell DX Object storage choices
that allow customers to grow capacity, add performance and
protect their data in a more economical manner. We are shifting
towards more Dell-branded storage offerings. In addition, our
recent acquisitions of Ocarina Networks, Inc. in Fiscal 2011 and
Compellent Technologies, Inc. in early Fiscal 2012 will enable
us to expand our storage product offerings. We believe that
along with our solid position with the EqualLogic product line,
these acquisitions allow us to expand our customer base for
mid-range and high-end storage solutions and deliver integrated
data management solutions to our customers.
Our services include a broad range of configurable IT and
business services, including infrastructure technology,
consulting and applications, and product-related support
services. Our customer engagement model groups our services with
similar demand, economic, and delivery profiles into three
categories of services: transactional; outsourcing; and
project-based.
|
|
|
|
|
Transactional We offer services that are
closely tied to the sale of our servers, storage, and client
hardware. These services include support services, managed
deployment, enterprise installation, and configuration services.
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Outsourcing Our outsourcing services business
is designed to reduce customer costs and help to increase the
efficiency and improve the quality of customer business
operations. Our outsourcing services include data center and
systems management, network management, life cycle application
development and management services, and business process
outsourcing services. A significant portion of the revenue we
derive from our outsourcing services contracts is typically
recurring in nature.
|
|
|
|
Project-based We also offer short-term
services that address a wide array of client needs, including IT
infrastructure, applications, business process, and business
consulting.
|
Software
and Peripherals
We offer Dell-branded printers and displays and a multitude of
competitively priced third-party peripheral products such as
printers, televisions, notebook accessories, mice, keyboards,
networking and wireless products, digital cameras, and other
products. We also sell a wide range of third-party software
products, including operating systems, business and office
applications, anti-virus and related security software,
entertainment software, and products in various other
categories. We operate an online software store, the Dell
Download Store, for consumers and small and medium-sized
businesses.
Client
Products
Our client products include mobility and desktop products.
We offer a variety of mobility products, including laptops,
netbooks, tablets and smartphones to our Commercial and Consumer
customers.
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Our Latitude, Vostro, and Dell
Precision lines of mobility notebooks are designed with our
Commercial customers in mind. The Latitude line is designed to
help our Commercial customers manage their total cost of
ownership through managed product lifecycles. The Vostro line is
designed to customize technology, services, and expertise to
suit the specific needs of small businesses. We also offer the
Precision line of mobile workstations for professional users who
demand exceptional performance to run sophisticated
applications. During Fiscal 2011, we introduced a new
line-up of
Latitude laptops, the new Vostro 3000 series laptop computers,
the Dell Precision M4500 mobile workstations, and made additions
to our Dell Latitude
E-family of
laptops.
|
|
|
|
Consumer For our Consumer customers, we offer
the Inspiron, XPS and Alienware lines of laptops. The Inspiron
line of notebook computers is designed for those seeking the
latest technology and high performance in a stylish and
affordable package. During Fiscal 2011, we introduced additional
models to our Inspiron family of notebooks including the
Inspiron Duo, a tablet computer that easily converts to a
laptop. Our Alienware line includes high performance gaming
systems targeted at customers seeking high-quality experiences
and cutting edge designs. In addition, during Fiscal 2011, we
introduced a new family of XPS laptops that are designed to
provide the ultimate entertainment experience in sound, graphics
and 3D-capabilities.
|
Our desktops PCs consist of the Optiplex, Precision, and Vostro
lines, which are targeted to our Commercial customers, and the
Inspiron, XPS, and Alienware lines, which are designed with our
Consumer customers in mind.
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial The OptiPlex line of desktops
allows our Commercial customers to manage their total cost of
ownership by providing them with a portfolio of secure,
manageable, and stable lifecycle products. The Vostro line is
designed to provide technology and services to suit the specific
needs of small businesses. Dell Precision desktop workstations
are intended for professional users who demand exceptional
performance from hardware platforms optimized and certified to
run sophisticated applications, such as those needed for
three-dimensional computer-aided design, digital content
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
creation, geographic information systems, computer animation,
software development, computer-aided engineering, game
development, and financial analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer The Inspiron line of desktop
computers is designed for mainstream PC users requiring the
latest features for their productivity and entertainment needs.
We target sales of the Alienware line of desktop computers to
customers seeking features ranging from multimedia capability to
high performance gaming. Our XPS desktops are designed for
customers seeking high performance for the most demanding
entertainment needs.
|
Financial
Services
We offer or arrange various customer financial services for our
business and consumer customers in the U.S. through Dell
Financial Services L.L.C. (DFS), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Dell. DFS offers a wide range of financial
services, including originating, collecting, and servicing
customer receivables related to the purchase of Dell products.
DFS offers private label credit financing programs, through an
unrelated, nationally chartered bank, to qualified consumer and
commercial customers and offers leases and fixed-term financing
to commercial customers. Financing through DFS is one of many
sources of funding that our customers may select. For additional
information about our financing arrangements, see
Part II Item 7
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Financing
Receivables and Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements included in Part II
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data. Currently, to support the financing needs of our
customers internationally, we have aligned with a select number
of third party financial services companies. These financial
services companies work directly with our customers to originate
and service financing arrangements, enabling customers to
finance and purchase Dell products and services. We are
exploring the possibility of expanding the DFS operations into
select international markets, with the expectation that we will
continue to work with third parties where appropriate.
For additional information about our products and services, see
Part II Item 7
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Results of
Operations Revenue by Product and Services
Categories, and Notes 4 and 16 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Part II Item 8 Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
Product
Development
We focus on developing modular and scalable technologies that
incorporate highly desirable features and capabilities at
competitive prices. We employ a collaborative approach to
product design and development in which our engineers, with
direct customer input, design innovative solutions and work with
a global network of technology companies to architect new system
designs, influence the direction of future development, and
integrate new technologies into our products. Through this
collaborative, customer-focused approach, we strive to deliver
new and relevant products, such as our enterprise solutions, and
services to the market quickly and efficiently. Our total
research, development, and engineering expenses were
$661 million for Fiscal 2011, $624 million for Fiscal
2010, and $665 million for Fiscal 2009.
Manufacturing
and Materials
Third parties manufacture the majority of the client products we
sell under the Dell brand. We have expanded our use of contract
manufacturers and manufacturing outsourcing relationships to
achieve our goals of generating cost efficiencies, delivering
products faster, better serving our customers, and building a
world-class supply chain. Our manufacturing facilities are
located in Austin, Texas; Penang, Malaysia; Xiamen, China;
Hortolândia, Brazil; Chennai, India; and Lodz, Poland.
Beginning in Fiscal 2009, we have reduced our fixed costs by
selling, closing and consolidating manufacturing and other
facilities, and have moved toward a more variable cost
manufacturing model. In connection with our implementation of
this model, we have announced the sale of our Poland facility,
which is expected to be finalized in the first half of Fiscal
2012. See Part I Item 2
Properties for information about our manufacturing and
distribution locations.
Our manufacturing process consists of assembly, software
installation, functional testing, and quality control. Testing
and quality control processes are also applied to components,
parts,
sub-assemblies,
and systems obtained
5
from third-party suppliers. Quality control is maintained
through the testing of components,
sub-assemblies,
and systems at various stages in the manufacturing process.
Quality control also includes a burn-in period for completed
units after assembly, ongoing production reliability audits,
failure tracking for early identification of production and
component problems, and information from customers obtained
through services and support programs. We are certified to the
ISO (International Organization for Standardization) 9001: 2008
Quality management systems standard. This certification includes
most of our global sites that design, manufacture, and service
our products.
We purchase materials, supplies, product components, and
products from a large number of vendors. In some cases, multiple
sources of supply are not available and hence we have to rely on
single-source vendors. In other cases, we may establish a
working relationship with a single source or a limited number of
sources if we believe it is advantageous to do so due to
performance, quality, support, delivery, capacity, or price
considerations. These relationships and dependencies have not
caused material supply disruptions in the past, and we believe
that any disruption that may occur because of our dependency on
single-or limited-source vendors would not disproportionately
disadvantage us relative to our competitors. See
Part I Item 1A
Risk Factors for information about the
risks associated with single- or limited-source suppliers.
Geographic
Operations
Our global corporate headquarters is located in Round Rock,
Texas. We have operations and conduct business in many countries
located in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Asia and other
geographic regions. We have invested in high growth countries
such as Brazil, Russia, India, and China, which we refer to as
BRIC, and we expect to continue our global expansion
in the years ahead. Our continued expansion outside of the
U.S. creates additional complexity in coordinating the
design, development, procurement, manufacturing, distribution,
and support of our increasingly complex product and service
offerings. For additional information on our product and service
offerings, see Products and Services
Manufacturing and Materials and
Part I Item 2
Properties. For information about percentages of revenue
we generated from our operations outside of the U.S. and
other financial information for each of the last three fiscal
years, see Part II
Item 7 Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Results of Operations and
Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
included in Part II Item 8
Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.
Competition
We operate in an industry in which there are rapid technological
advances in hardware, software, and service offerings and we
face ongoing product and price competition in all areas of our
business including both branded and generic competitors. We
compete based on our ability to offer to our customers
competitive, open, capable, affordable, and integrated solutions
that provide the most current and desired product and services
features. We believe that our strong relationships with our
customers and our distribution channels, such as retail, system
integrators, value-added resellers, distributors, and channel
partners, allow us to respond to changing customer needs faster
than many of our competitors. This connection with our customers
allows us to best meet customer needs and is one of our
competitive advantages.
Sales and
Marketing
We sell our products and services directly to customers through
our online store at www.dell.com, dedicated sales
representatives, telephone-based sales, and a variety of
indirect sales channels. Our customers include large global and
national corporate businesses, public institutions including
government, education and healthcare organizations, and law
enforcement agencies. Our customers also include small and
medium-sized businesses, and individual customers. Within each
geographic region, we have divided our sales resources among
these various customer groups. No single customer accounted for
more than 10% of our consolidated net revenue during any of the
last three fiscal years.
Our sales efforts are organized around the evolving needs of our
customers, and our marketing initiatives reflect this with our
brand, the power to do more. Our direct business
model emphasizes direct communication with our customers,
thereby allowing us to refine our products and marketing
programs for specific customer groups. Customers may offer
suggestions for current and future Dell products, services, and
operations on an interactive
6
portion of our Internet website called Dell IdeaStorm. In
addition, in order to react quickly to our customers
needs, we track our Net Promoter Score, a customer loyalty
metric that is widely used across various industries.
Increasingly, we also engage with customers through our social
media communities on Dell.com and in external social media
channels. This constant flow of communication allows us to
rapidly gauge customer satisfaction, respond to our
customers needs, and develop solutions that help them
achieve their goals.
For large business and institutional customers, we maintain a
field sales force throughout the world. Dedicated account teams,
which include field-based enterprise solution specialists, form
long-term relationships to provide our largest customers with a
single source of assistance, develop specific tailored solutions
for these customers, and provide us with customer feedback. For
large, multinational customers, we offer several programs
designed to provide single points of contact and accountability
with global account specialists, special global pricing, and
consistent global service and support programs. We also maintain
specific sales and marketing programs targeted at federal,
state, and local governmental agencies, as well as healthcare
and educational customers.
We market our products and services to small and medium-sized
businesses and consumers primarily by advertising on television
and through the Internet, advertising in a variety of print
media, and mailing or emailing a broad range of direct marketing
publications, such as promotional materials, catalogues, and
customer newsletters.
We also sell our products and services through indirect sales
channels. In the U.S., we sell products indirectly through
third-party solution providers, system integrators, and
third-party resellers. We also offer select consumer products in
retail stores in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, and
Africa, which we refer to as EMEA, and Asia-Pacific
Japan, which we refer to as APJ. Outside the U.S.,
we sell products indirectly through selected retailers to
benefit from the retailers existing end-user customer
relationships and valuable knowledge of traditional customs and
logistics in the country and to mitigate credit and country
risk, as well as because sales in some countries may be too
small to warrant a direct sales business unit. Our goal is to
have strategic relationships with a number of major retailers in
larger geographic regions. Retailers who currently sell our
products include Best Buy, Staples, Wal-Mart, DSGI, GOME, and
Carrefour, among others.
Patents,
Trademarks, and Licenses
At January 28, 2011, we held a worldwide portfolio of 2,991
patents and had an additional 1,972 patent applications pending.
We also hold licenses to use numerous third-party patents. To
replace expiring patents, we obtain new patents through our
ongoing research and development activities. The inventions
claimed in our patents and patent applications cover aspects of
our current and possible future computer system products,
manufacturing processes, and related technologies. Our product,
business method, and manufacturing process patents may establish
barriers to entry in many product lines. While we use our
patented inventions and also license them to others, we are not
substantially dependent on any single patent or group of related
patents. We have entered into a variety of intellectual property
licensing and cross-licensing agreements. We have also entered
into various software licensing agreements with other companies.
We anticipate that our worldwide patent portfolio will be of
value in negotiating intellectual property rights with others in
the industry.
We have obtained U.S. federal trademark registration for
the DELL word mark and the Dell logo mark. We own registrations
for 99 of our other trademarks in the U.S. At
January 28, 2011, we had pending applications for
registration of 15 other trademarks. We believe that
establishment of the DELL word mark and logo mark in the
U.S. is material to our operations. We have also applied
for or obtained registration of the DELL word mark and several
other marks in approximately 195 other countries.
From time to time, other companies and individuals assert
exclusive patent, copyright, trademark, or other intellectual
property rights to technologies or marks that are important to
the technology industry or our business. We evaluate each claim
relating to our products and, if appropriate, seek a license to
use the protected technology. The licensing agreements generally
do not require the licensor to assist us in duplicating its
patented technology, nor do these agreements protect us from
trade secret, copyright, or other violations by us or our
suppliers in developing or selling these products.
7
Government
Regulation and Sustainability
Our business is subject to regulation by various
U.S. federal and state governmental agencies and other
governmental agencies. Such regulation includes the radio
frequency emission regulatory activities of the
U.S. Federal Communications Commission; the anti-trust
regulatory activities of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission,
the U.S. Department of Justice, and the European Union; the
consumer protection laws and financial services regulations of
the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and various state
governmental agencies; the export regulatory activities of the
U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. Department of
Treasury; the import regulatory activities of U.S. Customs
and Border Protection; the product safety regulatory activities
of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission and the
U.S. Department of Transportation; the investor protection
and capital markets regulatory activities of the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; and the
environmental, employment and labor, and other regulatory
activities of a variety of governmental authorities in each of
the countries in which we conduct business. We were not assessed
any material environmental fines, nor did we have any material
environmental remediation or other environmental costs, during
Fiscal 2011.
Environmental stewardship and social responsibility are both
integral parts of how we manage our business, and complement our
focus on business efficiencies and customer satisfaction. We use
open dialogue with our stockholders, customers, vendors, and
other stakeholders as part of our sustainability governance
process where we take candid feedback and offer honest
discussions on the challenges we face globally. Our
environmental initiatives take many forms, including maximizing
product energy efficiency, reducing and eliminating sensitive
materials from our products, and providing responsible,
convenient computer recycling options for customers.
We are committed to reducing our greenhouse gas emissions. We
have set business requirements for our suppliers to disclose and
reduce their greenhouse gas impacts. We were the first company
in our industry to offer a free worldwide recycling program for
our consumers. We also provide consumers with no-charge
recycling of any brand of computer or printer with the purchase
of a new Dell computer or printer. We have streamlined our
transportation network to reduce transit times, minimize air
freight and reduce emissions. Our packaging is designed to
minimize box size and to increase recycled content of materials
along with recyclability. When developing and designing
products, we select materials guided by a precautionary approach
in which we seek to eliminate environmentally sensitive
substances (where reasonable alternatives exist) from our
products and work towards developing reliable, environmentally
sound, and commercially scalable solutions. We also have created
a series of tools that help customers assess their current IT
operations and uncover ways to reduce both the costs of those
operations and their impact on the environment.
Product
Backlog
We believe that product backlog is not a meaningful indicator of
net revenue that can be expected for any period. Our business
model generally gives us flexibility to manage product backlog
at any point in time by expediting shipping or prioritizing
customer orders toward products that have shorter lead times,
thereby reducing product backlog and increasing current period
revenue. Moreover, product backlog at any point in time may not
translate into net revenue in any subsequent period, as unfilled
orders can generally be canceled at any time by the customer.
Trademarks
and Service Marks
Unless otherwise noted, trademarks appearing in this report are
trademarks owned by us. We disclaim proprietary interest in the
marks and names of others. EMC is a registered trademark of EMC
Corporation. Windows 7 is a registered trademark of Microsoft
Corporation. FICO is a registered trademark of Fair Isaac and
Company. Net Promoter Score is a trademark of Satmetrix Systems,
Inc., Bain & Company, Inc., and Fred Reichheld.
8
Available
Information
The mailing address of our principal executive offices is One
Dell Way, Round Rock, Texas 78682. Our telephone number is
1-800-BUY-DELL.
We maintain an Internet website at www.dell.com. All of
our reports filed with the SEC (including annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K,
and all amendments to those reports) are accessible through the
Investor Relations section of our website at
www.dell.com/investor, free of charge, as soon as
reasonably practicable after we electronically file the reports
with the SEC. You may read and copy any materials that we file
with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You
may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference
Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy
and information statements, and other information regarding
issuers that file electronically with the SEC at
www.sec.gov. Information on our website is not
incorporated by reference into this report and does not
otherwise form a part of this report.
Employees
At the end of Fiscal 2011, we had approximately 103,300 total
employees (consisting of 100,300 regular employees and 3,000
temporary employees), compared to approximately 96,000 total
employees (consisting of 94,300 regular employees and 1,700
temporary employees) at the end of Fiscal 2010. Our acquisition
of Perot Systems Corporation in Fiscal 2010 added 23,800 regular
employees. Approximately 36,900 of the regular employees at the
end of Fiscal 2011 were located in the U.S., and approximately
63,400 regular employees were located in other countries.
Executive
Officers of Dell
The following table sets forth the name, age, and position of
each of the persons who were serving as our executive officers
as of March 4, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Title
|
|
Michael S. Dell
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
Bradley R. Anderson
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Enterprise Product Group
|
Paul D. Bell
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
President, Public and Large Enterprise
|
Jeffrey W. Clarke
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Vice Chairman, Operations and Technology
|
Stephen J. Felice
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
President, Consumer, Small and Medium Business
|
Brian T. Gladden
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
David L. Johnson
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Strategy
|
Steve H. Price
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Human Resources
|
Karen H. Quintos
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer
|
Ronald Rose
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, E-Commerce & Information Technology
|
Stephen F. Schuckenbrock
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
President, Services
|
Lawrence P. Tu
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
Our executive officers are elected annually by, and serve at the
pleasure of, our Board of Directors.
Set forth below is biographical information about each of our
executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
Michael S. Dell Mr. Dell currently
serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive
Officer. He has held the title of Chairman of the Board since he
founded Dell in 1984. Mr. Dell also served as Chief
Executive Officer of Dell from 1984 until July 2004 and resumed
that role in January 2007. He serves on the Foundation Board of
the World Economic Forum, the executive committee of the
International Business Council, and is a member of the
U.S. Business Council. He also sits on the Technology CEO
Council and the governing board of the Indian School of Business
in Hyderabad, India.
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
Bradley R. Anderson Mr. Anderson joined
us in July 2005 and has served as Senior Vice President,
Enterprise Product Group since January 2009. In this role, he is
responsible for worldwide engineering, design, development and
marketing of Dells enterprise products, including servers,
networking and storage systems. From July 2005 until January
2009, Mr. Anderson served as Senior Vice President,
Business Product Group. Prior to joining Dell, Mr. Anderson
was Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Industry
Standard Servers business at Hewlett-Packard Company
(HP), where he was responsible for HPs server
solutions. Previously, he was Vice President of Server, Storage,
and Infrastructure for HP, where he led the team responsible for
server, storage, peripheral, and infrastructure products. Before
joining HP in 1996, Mr. Anderson held top management
positions at Cray Research in executive staff, field marketing,
sales, finance, and corporate marketing. Mr. Anderson
earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering
from Texas A&M University and a Master of Business
Administration degree from Harvard University.
|
|
|
|
Paul D. Bell Mr. Bell has been with us
since 1996 and currently serves as President, Public and Large
Enterprise a position he has held since January 2011.
Mr. Bell has been responsible for the Public business since
January 2009, where he is responsible for leading the teams that
help governments, education, healthcare and other public
organizations make full use of information technology. Beginning
in January of 2011, he has also assumed the responsibilities of
the Large Enterprise business, leading the delivery of
innovative and globally consistent Dell solutions and services
to the worlds largest corporate IT users. From March 2007
until January 2009, Mr. Bell served as Senior Vice
President and President, Americas. In this role, Mr. Bell
was responsible for all sales and customer support operations
across the Americas region other than our Consumer business.
From February 2000 until March 2007, Mr. Bell served as
Senior Vice President and President, Europe, Middle East, and
Africa. Prior to service in this position, Mr. Bell served
as Senior Vice President, Home and Small Business. Prior to
joining Dell in July 1996, Mr. Bell was a management
consultant with Bain & Company for six years,
including two years as a consultant on our account.
Mr. Bell received Bachelors degrees in Fine Arts and
Business Administration from Pennsylvania State University and a
Master of Business Administration degree from the Yale School of
Organization and Management.
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey W. Clarke Mr. Clarke currently
serves as Vice Chairman, Operations and Technology. In this
role, in which he has served since January 2009, he is
responsible for worldwide engineering, design and development of
Dells business client products, including Dell OptiPlex
Desktops, Latitude Notebooks and Precision Workstations, and
production of all company products worldwide. From January 2003
until January 2009, Mr. Clarke served as Senior Vice
President, Business Product Group. In 1995, Mr. Clarke
became the director of desktop development, and from November
2001 to January 2003 he served as Vice President and General
Manager, Relationship Product Group. Mr. Clarke joined Dell
in 1987 as a quality engineer and has served in a variety of
engineering and management roles. Mr. Clarke received a
Bachelors degree in Electrical Engineering from the
University of Texas at San Antonio.
|
|
|
|
Stephen J. Felice Mr. Felice currently
serves as President, Consumer, Small and Medium Business, a
position he has held since November 2009. Mr. Felice leads
the Dell organization that creates and delivers specific
solutions and technology to small and medium-sized businesses
globally and is responsible for Dells portfolio of
consumer products, including desktops, laptops, software and
peripherals as well as product design and sales. From January
2009 until November 2009, Mr. Felice served as President,
Small and Medium Business, and from March 2007 until January
2009, as Senior Vice President and President, Asia
Pacific-Japan, after having served as Vice President, Asia
Pacific-Japan since August 2005. Mr. Felice was responsible
for our operations throughout the APJ region, including sales
and customer service centers in Penang, Malaysia, and Xiamen,
China. From February 2002 until July 2005, Mr. Felice was
Vice President, Corporate Business Group, Dell Americas.
Mr. Felice joined us in February 1999 and has held various
executive roles in our sales and consulting services
organizations. Prior to joining Dell, Mr. Felice served as
Chief Executive Officer and President of DecisionOne Corp.
Mr. Felice also served as Vice President, Planning and
Development, with Bell Atlantic Customer Services, and he spent
five years with Shell Oil in Houston. Mr. Felice holds a
Bachelors degree in Business Administration from the
University of Iowa and a Master of Business Administration
degree from the University of Houston.
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
Brian T. Gladden Mr. Gladden serves as
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(CFO). In this role, in which he has served since
June 2008, he is responsible for all aspects of Dells
finance functions, including accounting, financial planning and
analysis, tax, treasury, investor relations, and is also
responsible for our global security and facilities. Prior to
joining Dell, Mr. Gladden was President and CEO of SABIC
Innovative Plastics Holding BV from August 2007 through May
2008. Prior to this role, Mr. Gladden spent nearly
20 years with General Electric Company (GE) in
a variety of financial and management leadership roles.
Mr. Gladden serves as co-chair of the Tech CFO Leadership
Group, whose mission is to advance critical policy issues that
promote U.S. competitiveness. He is also a member of the
University of Texas McCombs School of Business Advisory Council.
Mr. Gladden earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Business
Administration and Finance from Millersville University in
Millersville, Pennsylvania.
|
|
|
|
David L. Johnson Mr. Johnson serves as
Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy and Business
Development, for Dell. He joined Dell in June of 2009 as Senior
Vice President, Corporate Strategy. In this role, he works with
Michael Dell on the development of short-and long-term strategy,
and also with leaders of the companys global business
units on their respective growth strategies. In June 2010,
Mr. Johnson assumed the responsibility for Dells
Business Development strategy, including responsibility for
Dells merger and acquisition strategy as well as other
strategic investments. Mr. Johnson previously spent
27 years at IBM in a variety of corporate-development and
finance roles, and was a member of the companys senior
leadership team. Mr. Johnson holds both an MBA and a
Bachelors degree in English from Boston College.
|
|
|
|
Steven H. Price Mr. Price currently
serves as Senior Vice President, Human Resources. In this role,
he is responsible for overall human resources (HR) strategy in
support of the purpose, values and business initiatives of Dell.
He is also responsible for developing and driving people
strategy and fostering an environment where the global Dell team
thrives. Mr. Price joined Dell in September 1997 and has
played leadership roles throughout the HR organization,
including Vice President of HR for the global Consumer business,
Global Talent Management and Americas Human Resources. From
November 2006 until June 2010, he served as Vice President,
Human Resources Dell Global Consumer Group. From January 2003
until November 2006, he served as Vice President, Human
Resources Dell Americas Business Group. From July 2001 until
January 2003, he served as Vice President, Human Resources
Global HR Operations. From May 1999 to July 2001, he served as
Vice President, Human Resources Dell EMEA. Prior to joining Dell
in 1997, Mr. Price spent 13 years with SC Johnson Wax,
based in Racine, Wisconsin. Having started his career there in
sales, he later moved into HR, where he held a variety of senior
positions. Mr. Price is a member of the Executive Advisory
Board for the Rawls College of Business at Texas Tech University
and also serves on the Executive Advisory Board for The Wharton
School at the University of Pennsylvania. He holds a
Bachelors degree in Business from Southwestern Oklahoma
State University and a Masters degree in Business
Administration from the University of Central Oklahoma.
|
|
|
|
Karen Quintos Karen Quintos is Senior Vice
President and Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) for
Dell, where she is responsible for bringing the companys
brand to life for Dell customers, team members and stakeholders
around the world. She leads brand strategy, global
communications, social media, corporate responsibility, global
research, marketing talent development and agency management.
Before becoming CMO for Dell in September 2010, Ms. Quintos
served as Vice President of Dells global Public business,
from January 2008 to September 2010, and was responsible for
driving global marketing strategies, product and pricing
programs, communications and channel plans. She has also held
various executive roles in Small and Medium Business marketing,
Dells Services and Supply Chain Management teams since
joining Dell in 2000. She came to Dell from Citigroup, where she
served as Vice President of Global Operations and Technology.
She also spent 12 years with Merck & Co., where
she held a variety of roles in marketing, planning, operations
and supply chain. Ms. Quintos holds a Masters degree
in Marketing and International Business from New York University
and a Bachelor of Science degree in Supply Chain Management from
The Pennsylvania State University State College. She has served
on multiple boards of directors and currently serves on the
Susan G. Komen for the Cure, Penn States Smeal Business
School
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
Board of Visitors, Association of National Advertisers, the Ad
Council and Dells Womens Networking Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald V. Rose Mr. Rose joined Dell in
May 2010 as Senior Vice President of Dell.com, where he oversees
global online platforms for Dell, including the companys
Web site, its customer Premier Pages and its online customer
support. He is responsible for driving the strategy, execution
and measurement for Dell.com, one of the leading ecommerce
destinations for people around the world. From 1999 until
joining Dell, Mr. Rose led technology at priceline.com. as
Chief Information Officer. He helped build its reputation for
outstanding technology execution, and was instrumental in
building and managing the IT infrastructure that provides travel
services in 90 countries around the world. Prior to joining
priceline.com in 1999, Mr. Rose was Chief Technology
Officer for Standard & Poors Retail Markets,
where he led many of the companys most advanced technology
initiatives. He has also worked as a technology management
consultant for international travel companies. A published
technology author, Mr. Rose earned a Masters degree
in Information Technology from Georgia Tech. He also holds a
Bachelors degree in Science from Tulane University and a
Bachelors degree in Science from the University of
Aberdeen, Scotland.
|
|
|
|
Stephen F. Schuckenbrock
Mr. Schuckenbrock currently serves as President,
Services. In this role, he is responsible for developing and
delivering a
best-in-class
suite of intelligent,
end-to-end
IT services and business solutions for global corporations,
government, health care, educational institutions and
medium-sized businesses in more than 180 countries around the
world. Mr. Schuckenbrock joined us in January 2007 as
Senior Vice President and President, Global Services. In
September 2007, he assumed the additional role of Chief
Information Officer, and he served in those roles until January
2009. In those roles, he was responsible for all aspects of our
services business, with worldwide responsibility for Dell
enterprise service offerings, and was also responsible for our
global information systems and technology structure. From
January 2009 until re-assuming the Services role in January
2011, Mr. Schuckenbrock was President, Large Enterprise,
leading the delivery of innovative and globally consistent Dell
solutions and services to the worlds largest corporate IT
users. Prior to joining Dell, Mr. Schuckenbrock served as
Co-Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President of
Global Sales and Services for Electronic Data Systems
Corporation (EDS). Before joining EDS in 2003, he
was Chief Operating Officer of The Feld Group, an information
technology consulting organization. Mr. Schuckenbrock
served as Global Chief Information Officer at PepsiCo from 1995
to 2000. Mr. Schuckenbrock earned a Bachelors degree
in Business Administration from Elon University.
|
|
|
|
Lawrence P. Tu Mr. Tu joined us as
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary in July
2004, and is responsible for overseeing Dells global
legal, governmental affairs, and ethics and compliance
departments. Before joining Dell, Mr. Tu served as
Executive Vice President and General Counsel at NBC Universal
for three years. Prior to his position at NBC, he was a partner
with the law firm of OMelveny & Myers LLP, where
he focused on energy, technology, Internet, and media-related
transactions. He also served five years as managing partner of
the firms Hong Kong office. Mr. Tus prior
experience also includes serving as General Counsel Asia-Pacific
for Goldman Sachs, attorney for the U.S. State Department,
and law clerk for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Thurgood
Marshall. Mr. Tu holds Juris Doctor and Bachelor of Arts
degrees from Harvard University, as well as a Masters
degree from Oxford University, where he was a Rhodes Scholar.
|
ITEM 1A
RISK FACTORS
Our business, operating results, financial condition and
prospects are subject to a variety of significant risks, many of
which are beyond our control. The following is a description of
some of the important risk factors that may cause our actual
results in future periods to differ substantially from those we
currently expect or seek.
|
|
|
|
|
We face intense competition, which may adversely affect our
industry unit share position, revenue, and profitability.
|
We operate in an industry in which there are rapid technological
advances in hardware, software, and service offerings, and we
face aggressive product and price competition from both branded
and generic competitors. We compete based on our ability to
offer to our customers competitive open, capable,
12
affordable, and integrated solutions that provide the most
current and desired product and services features. We expect
that competition will continue to be intense, and there is a
risk our competitors products may be less costly, provide
better performance or include additional features when compared
to our products. Moreover, our efforts to balance our mix of
products and services to optimize profitability, liquidity, and
growth may put pressure on our industry unit share position.
In addition to competitive factors we face as a result of the
current state of our business and our industry, we confront
additional competitive challenges as our business and industry
continue to grow and evolve. As we expand globally, we may see
new and increased competition in different geographic regions.
Moreover, the generally low barriers to entry in our business
increase the potential for challenges from new industry
competitors. We may also see increased competition from new
types of products as the options for mobile and cloud computing
solutions increase. Further, as our industry evolves and our
company grows, companies with which we have strategic alliances
may become competitors in other product areas or our current
competitors may enter into new strategic relationships with new
or existing competitors, all of which may further increase the
competitive pressures we face.
|
|
|
|
|
If our cost efficiency measures are not successful, we may
become less competitive.
|
We continue to focus on minimizing our operating expenses
through cost improvements and simplifying our structure.
However, certain factors may prevent the achievement of these
goals, which may in turn negatively affect our competitive
position. For example, we may experience delays or unanticipated
costs in implementing our cost efficiency plans. As a result, we
may not achieve our expected cost efficiencies in the time
anticipated, or at all.
|
|
|
|
|
We may not successfully execute our growth strategy if we
fail to manage effectively the change involved in implementing
our strategic initiatives.
|
Our growth strategy involves reaching more customers through new
distribution channels, expanding our relationships with
resellers, and augmenting select areas of our business through
targeted acquisitions and other commercial arrangements. As we
reach more customers through new distribution channels and
expanded reseller relationships, we may fail to manage in an
effective manner the increasingly difficult tasks of inventory
management and demand forecasting. Our ability to accomplish the
goals of our growth strategy depends on our success in
transitioning our sales capabilities in accordance with our
strategy, adding to the breadth of our higher margin offerings
through selective acquisitions of other businesses, and managing
the effects of these strategic initiatives. If we are unable to
meet these challenges, our results of operations could be
unfavorably affected.
|
|
|
|
|
Our inability to manage solutions, product, and services
transitions in an effective manner could reduce the demand for
our solutions, products and services and the profitability of
our operations.
|
Continuing improvements in technology result in frequent new
solutions, product, and services introductions, short product
life cycles, and improvements in product performance
characteristics. If we cannot manage in an effective manner the
transition to new solutions offerings and these offerings
new products and services, customer demand for our solutions,
products and services could diminish and our profitability could
suffer. We are increasingly sourcing new products and
transitioning existing products through our contract
manufacturers and manufacturing outsourcing relationships in
order to generate cost efficiencies, deliver products faster,
and better serve our customers. The success of product
transitions depends on a number of factors that include the
availability of sufficient quantities of components at
attractive costs. In addition, product transitions present
execution challenges and risks, including the risk that new or
upgraded products may have quality issues or other defects.
|
|
|
|
|
Adverse global economic conditions and instability in
financial markets may harm our business and result in reduced
net revenue and profitability.
|
As a global company with customers in virtually every business
and industry, our performance depends significantly on global
economic conditions. Adverse economic conditions may negatively
affect customer demand for our products and services and result
in postponed or decreased spending amid customer
13
concerns over unemployment, reduced asset values, volatile
energy costs, geopolitical issues, the availability and cost of
credit, and the stability and solvency of financial
institutions, financial markets, businesses, local and state
governments, and sovereign nations. Weak global economic
conditions also could harm our business by contributing to
potential product shortages or delays, insolvency of key
suppliers, potential customer and counterparty insolvencies, and
increased challenges in conducting our treasury operations. All
of these possible effects of weak global economic conditions
could negatively impact our net revenue and profitability.
|
|
|
|
|
Our ability to generate substantial
non-U.S. net
revenue is subject to additional risks and uncertainties.
|
Sales outside the U.S. accounted for approximately 48% of
our consolidated net revenue for Fiscal 2011. Our future growth
rates and success are substantially dependent on continued
growth of our business outside the U.S., including in the key
emerging countries of Brazil, Russia, India, and China. Our
international operations face many risks and uncertainties,
including varied local economic and labor conditions, political
instability, changes in those regulatory environments, trade
protection measures, tax laws (including U.S. taxes on
foreign operations), copyright levies, and foreign currency
exchange rates. Any of these factors could adversely affect our
operations and profitability.
|
|
|
|
|
Weak economic conditions and additional regulation could harm
our financial services activities.
|
Our financial services activities are negatively affected by an
adverse economic environment through related loan delinquencies
and defaults. Although loan delinquencies and defaults continue
to slow from higher levels in recent periods, an increase in
defaults would result in greater net credit losses, which may
require us to increase our reserves for customer receivables in
the future. In addition, the implementation of new financial
services regulation could unfavorably impact the profitability
and cash flows of our consumer financing activities.
|
|
|
|
|
If we fail to achieve favorable pricing from our vendors, our
profitability could be adversely affected.
|
Our profitability is affected by our ability to achieve
favorable pricing from our vendors and contract manufacturers,
including through negotiations for vendor rebates, marketing
funds, and other vendor funding received in the normal course of
business. Because these supplier negotiations are continuous and
reflect the ongoing competitive environment, the variability in
timing and amount of incremental vendor discounts and rebates
can affect our profitability. These vendor programs may change
periodically, potentially resulting in adverse profitability
trends if we cannot adjust pricing or cost variables. Our
inability to establish a cost and product advantage, or
determine alternative means to deliver value to our customers,
may adversely affect our industry unit share position, revenue,
and profitability.
|
|
|
|
|
If we fail to deliver consistent quality products and
services, demand for our products and profits could be
negatively impacted.
|
In selling our extensive line of products and services, many of
which include third-party components, we must identify and
address any quality issues associated with our offerings.
Although quality testing is performed regularly to detect any
quality problems and implement required solutions, our failure
to identify and correct significant product quality issues
before sale could result in lower sales, increased warranty or
replacement expenses, and diminished customer confidence that
could harm our operating results.
|
|
|
|
|
Our reliance on vendors for products and components, many of
whom are single-source or limited source suppliers, could harm
our business by adversely affecting product availability,
delivery, reliability and cost.
|
We maintain several single-source or limited-source supplier
relationships, either because multiple sources are not readily
available or because the relationships are advantageous to us
due to performance, quality, support, delivery, capacity, or
price considerations. If the supply of a critical single- or
limited-source product or component is delayed or curtailed, we
may not be able to ship the related product in desired
quantities and in a timely manner. Even where multiple sources
of supply are available, qualification of the
14
alternative suppliers and establishment of reliable supplies
could result in delays and a possible loss of sales, which could
harm our operating results.
We obtain many of our products and all of our components from
third-party vendors, many of which are located outside of the
U.S. In addition, significant portions of the products we
sell are now assembled by contract manufacturers, primarily in
various parts of Asia. A significant concentration of this
outsourced manufacturing is currently performed by only a few of
our contract manufacturers, often in single locations. We sell
components to these contract manufacturers and generate large
non-trade accounts receivables, an arrangement that presents a
risk of uncollectibility if the financial condition of a
contract manufacturer should deteriorate.
While these relationships generate cost efficiencies, they
reduce our direct control over production. Our increasing
reliance on these vendors subjects us to a greater risk of
shortages, and reduced control over delivery schedules of
components and products, as well as a greater risk of increases
in product and component costs. Because we maintain minimal
levels of component and product inventories, a disruption in
component or product availability could harm our financial
performance and our ability to satisfy customer needs. In
addition, defective parts and products from these vendors could
reduce product reliability and harm our reputation.
|
|
|
|
|
We may not successfully implement our acquisition
strategy.
|
We acquire companies as a part of our growth strategy. These
acquisitions may involve significant new risks and uncertainties
that could adversely affect our profitability or operations,
including distraction of management attention from a focus on
our current business operations, insufficient new revenue to
offset expenses, inadequate return of capital, integration
challenges, retention of employees of acquired businesses, new
regulatory requirements, and issues not discovered in our due
diligence process. Further, our acquisitions may negatively
impact our relationships with strategic partners if these
acquisitions are seen as bringing us into competition with such
partners. In addition, if we make changes in our business
strategy or if external conditions adversely affect our business
operations, we may be required to record an impairment charge
for goodwill or intangibles, which would lead to decreased
assets and reduced net operating performance.
|
|
|
|
|
Our profitability may be adversely affected by our product,
customer, and geographic sales mix and by seasonal sales
trends.
|
Our overall profitability for any particular period may be
adversely affected by changes in the mix of products, customers,
and geographic markets reflected in our sales for that period,
as well as by seasonal trends. Our profit margins vary among
products, services, customers, and geographic markets. For
instance, our services offerings generally have a higher profit
margin than our consumer products. In addition, parts of our
business are subject to seasonal sales trends. Among the trends
with the most significant impact on our operating results, sales
to government customers (particularly the U.S. federal
government) are typically stronger in our third fiscal quarter,
sales in EMEA are often weaker in our third fiscal quarter, and
consumer sales are typically strongest during our fourth fiscal
quarter.
|
|
|
|
|
Our financial performance could suffer from any reduced
access to the capital markets by us or some of our customers.
|
We are increasingly dependent on access to debt and capital
sources to provide financing for our customers and to obtain
funds in the U.S. for general corporate purposes, including
working capital, acquisitions, capital expenditures, funding of
customer receivables, and share repurchases. In addition, we
have customer financing relationships with some companies that
rely on access to the capital markets to meet significant
funding needs. Any inability of these companies to access such
markets could compel us to self-fund transactions with them or
forego customer financing opportunities, potentially harming our
financial performance. The debt and capital markets may
experience extreme volatility and disruption from time to time
in the future, resulting in higher credit spreads in the capital
markets and higher funding costs for us. Deterioration in our
business performance, a credit rating downgrade, volatility in
the securitization markets, changes in financial services
regulation or adverse changes in the economy could lead to
15
reductions in debt availability and could limit our ability to
continue asset securitizations or other financings from debt or
capital sources, reduce the amount of financing receivables that
we originate, or negatively affect the costs or terms on which
we may be able to obtain capital. Any of these developments
could unfavorably affect our net revenue, profitability, and
cash flows.
|
|
|
|
|
Loss of government contracts could harm our business.
|
Contracts with the U.S. federal, state and local
governments and foreign governments are subject to future
funding that may affect the extension or termination of programs
and are subject to the right of the government to terminate for
convenience or non-appropriation. In addition, if we violate
legal or regulatory requirements, the applicable government
could suspend or disbar us as a contractor, which would
unfavorably affect our net revenue and profitability.
|
|
|
|
|
We are subject to the risk of temporary suspension or
debarment from contracting with U.S. federal, state and
local governments as a result of settlements of an SEC
investigation by our company and our Chairman and CEO.
|
As part of our settlements of the SEC investigation into certain
disclosure, accounting and financial reporting matters, we and
our Chairman and CEO consented, without admitting or denying the
SECs allegations, to a permanent injunction against future
violations of certain provisions of the federal securities laws.
The existence and terms of such injunctions may adversely affect
our business under contracts with U.S. federal, state and
local governments. The procurement regulations of federal
governmental agencies and many state and local governments with
which we do business generally vest those governments with broad
discretion to suspend or debar companies from product and
services contracts for periods of generally up to three years if
the governments determine that companies do not prospectively
qualify as currently responsible contracting parties. The
various levels of government could also require us to operate
under special reporting and other compliance measures, which
could increase our costs of performance under the applicable
contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
The exercise by customers of certain rights under our
services contracts, or our failure to perform as we anticipate
at the time we enter services contracts, could adversely affect
our revenue and profitability.
|
Many of our services contracts allow the customer to take the
following actions that may adversely affect our revenue and
profitability:
|
|
|
|
|
Terminate the contract if our performance does not meet
specified service levels
|
|
|
|
Look to a benchmarkers opinion of market rates in order to
request a rate reduction or alternatively terminate the contract
|
|
|
|
Reduce the customers use of our services and, as a result,
reduce our fees
|
|
|
|
Terminate the contract early upon payment of an agreed fee
|
In addition, we estimate our costs to deliver the services at
the outset of the contract. If we fail to estimate accurately,
our actual costs may significantly exceed our estimates, even
for a time and materials contract, and we may incur losses on
the services contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
Our business could suffer if we do not develop and protect
our own intellectual property or do not obtain or protect
licenses to intellectual property developed by others on
commercially reasonable and competitive terms.
|
If we or our suppliers are unable to develop or protect
desirable technology or technology licenses, we may be prevented
from marketing products, could be forced to market products
without desirable features, or could incur substantial costs to
redesign products, defend or enforce legal actions, or pay
damages. Although our suppliers might be contractually obligated
to obtain or protect such licenses and indemnify us against
related expenses, those suppliers could be unable to meet their
obligations. Similarly, we invest in research and development
and obtain additional intellectual property through
acquisitions, but these activities do not guarantee that we will
develop or obtain intellectual property necessary for profitable
16
operations. Costs involved in developing and protecting rights
in intellectual property may have a negative impact on our
business. In addition, our operating costs could increase
because of copyright levies or similar fees by rights holders
and collection agencies in European and other countries.
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure disruptions or breaches of data security could
harm our business.
|
We depend on our information technology and manufacturing
infrastructure to achieve our business objectives. If a
disruption impairs our infrastructure, such as one caused by a
computer virus, natural disaster, manufacturing failure,
telecommunications system failure, defective or improperly
installed new or upgraded business management systems, or
intentional tampering or data-breach by a third party, we may be
unable to receive or process orders, manufacture and ship
products in a timely manner, or otherwise conduct our business
in the normal course. Moreover, portions of our services
business involve the processing, storage, and transmission of
data, which would also be negatively affected by such an event.
A disruption could cause us to lose customers and revenue,
particularly during a period of disproportionately heavy demand,
and could result in the loss or unintentional disclosure of
company or customer information and could damage our reputation.
We also could incur significant expense in remediating these
problems and in addressing related data security and privacy
concerns.
|
|
|
|
|
Our performance could be adversely affected by our failure to
hedge effectively our exposure to fluctuations in foreign
currency exchange rates and interest rates.
|
We utilize derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest
rates. Some of these instruments and contracts may involve
elements of market and credit risk in excess of the amounts
recognized in our financial statements. If we are not successful
in monitoring our foreign exchange exposures and conducting an
effective hedging program, our foreign currency hedging
activities may not offset the impact of fluctuations in currency
exchange rates on our future results of operations and financial
position.
|
|
|
|
|
We are subject to counterparty default risks.
|
We have numerous arrangements with financial institutions that
include cash and investment deposits, interest rate swap
contracts, foreign currency option contracts, and forward
contracts. As a result, we are subject to the risk that the
counterparty to one or more of these arrangements will default,
either voluntarily or involuntarily, on its performance under
the terms of the arrangement. In times of market distress, a
counterparty may default rapidly and without notice to us, and
we may be unable to take action to cover our exposure, either
because we lack the contractual ability or because market
conditions make it difficult to take effective action. If one of
our counterparties becomes insolvent or files for bankruptcy,
our ability eventually to recover any losses suffered as a
result of that counterpartys default may be limited by the
liquidity of the counterparty or the applicable legal regime
governing the bankruptcy proceeding. In the event of such
default, we could incur significant losses, which could harm our
business, results of operations, and financial condition.
|
|
|
|
|
Unfavorable results of legal proceedings could harm our
business and result in substantial costs.
|
We are involved in various claims, suits, investigations, and
legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary
course of our business, including those described elsewhere in
this report. Additional legal claims or regulatory matters may
arise in the future and could involve stockholder, consumer,
government regulatory and compliance, intellectual property,
antitrust, tax, and other issues on a global basis. Litigation
is inherently unpredictable. Regardless of the merit of the
claims, litigation may be both time-consuming and disruptive to
our business. We could incur judgments or enter into settlements
of claims that could adversely affect our operating results or
cash flows in a particular period. In addition, our business,
operating results, and financial condition could be adversely
affected if any infringement or other intellectual property
claim made against us by any third party is successful, or if we
fail to develop non-infringing technology or license the
proprietary rights on commercially reasonable terms and
conditions.
17
|
|
|
|
|
The expiration of tax holidays or favorable tax rate
structures, or unfavorable outcomes in tax audits and other tax
compliance matters, could result in an increase in our current
tax expense or our effective income tax rate in the future.
|
Portions of our operations are subject to a reduced tax rate or
are free of tax under various tax holidays that expire in whole
or in part from time to time. Many of these holidays may be
extended when certain conditions are met, or terminated if
certain conditions are not met. If the tax holidays are not
extended, or if we fail to satisfy the conditions of the reduced
tax rate, then our effective tax rate would increase in the
future. Our effective tax rate could also increase if our
geographic sales mix changes. We are under audit in various tax
jurisdictions. An unfavorable outcome in certain of these
matters could result in a substantial increase to our tax
expense. In addition, changes in tax laws (including
U.S. taxes on foreign operations) could adversely affect
our operations and profitability.
|
|
|
|
|
Our success depends on our ability to attract, retain, and
motivate our key employees.
|
We rely on key personnel, including our CEO and executive
leadership team, to support anticipated continued rapid
international growth and increasingly complex product and
services offerings. We may not be able to attract, retain, and
motivate the key professional, technical, marketing, and staff
resources we need.
|
|
|
|
|
We face risks relating to any inability to maintain strong
internal controls.
|
If management is not successful in maintaining a strong internal
control environment, investors could lose confidence in our
reported financial information. This could lead to a decline in
our stock price, limit our ability to access the capital markets
in the future, and require us to incur additional costs to
improve our internal control systems and procedures.
|
|
|
|
|
Current environmental and safety laws, or laws enacted in the
future, may harm our business.
|
Our operations are subject to environmental and safety
regulation in all of the areas in which we conduct business. Our
product design and procurement operations must comply with new
and future requirements relating to climate change laws and
regulations, materials composition, sourcing, energy efficiency
and collection, recycling, treatment, transportation and
disposal of our electronics products, including restrictions on
mercury, lead, cadmium, lithium metal, lithium ion and other
substances. If we fail to comply with applicable rules and
regulations regarding the transportation, source, use and sale
of such regulated substances, we could be subject to liability.
The costs and timing of costs under environmental and safety
laws are difficult to predict, but could have an unfavorable
impact on our business.
|
|
|
|
|
Armed hostilities, terrorism, natural disasters, or public
health issues could harm our business.
|
Armed hostilities, terrorism, natural disasters, or public
health issues, whether in the U.S. or abroad, could cause
damage or disruption to us, our suppliers or customers, or could
create political or economic instability, any of which could
harm our business. These events could cause a decrease in demand
for our products, could make it difficult or impossible for us
to deliver products or for our suppliers to deliver components,
and could create delays and inefficiencies in our supply chain.
|
|
ITEM 1B
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
At January 28, 2011, we owned or leased a total of
approximately 18.1 million square feet of office,
manufacturing, and warehouse space worldwide, approximately
8.3 million square feet of which is located in the
U.S. We owned approximately 62% of this space and leased
the remaining 38%. Included in these amounts are approximately
2.1 million square feet that are either vacant or sublet.
Our principal executive offices, including global headquarters,
are located at One Dell Way, Round Rock, Texas. Our business
centers, which include facilities that contain operations for
sales, technical support, administrative,
18
and support functions, occupy 9.7 million square feet of
space, of which we own 40%. We own 2.6 million square feet
of manufacturing space. Our design centers are housed in
1.6 million square feet of space, of which we own 48%.
During Fiscal 2011, we closed a manufacturing plant in
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, consolidated space on our Austin,
Texas campus allowing us to close one building, and sold our
fulfillment center in Nashville, Tennessee. Currently, a
business center in Coimbatore, India and a data center in
Washington are under construction.
We have announced the sale of our Lodz, Poland manufacturing
facility. We may continue to sell, close, and consolidate
additional facilities depending on a number of factors,
including end-user demand and progress in our continuous
evaluation of our overall cost structure. We believe that our
existing properties are suitable and adequate for our current
needs and that we can readily meet our requirements for
additional space at competitive rates by extending expiring
leases or by finding alternative space.
As discussed in Part I
Item 1 Business, we have four operating
segments identified as Large Enterprise, Public, SMB and
Consumer. Because of the interrelation of the products and
services offered in each of these segments, we do not designate
our properties to any segment. All four segments use
substantially all of the properties at least in part, and we
retain the flexibility to make future use of each of the
properties available to each of the segments.
|
|
ITEM 3
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
The information required by this Item 3 is incorporated
herein by reference to the information set forth under the
caption Legal Matters in Note 11 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Part II Item 8 Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data and is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 4
|
(REMOVED
AND RESERVED)
|
19
PART II
ITEM 5
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market
for Common Stock
Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market of
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC under the symbol DELL. Information
regarding the high and low sales prices per share of our common
stock for Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010, as reported by the NASDAQ
Global Select Market, is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
Stock sales price per share for the fiscal year ended
January 28, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
17.52
|
|
|
$
|
16.46
|
|
|
$
|
14.89
|
|
|
$
|
14.70
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
12.92
|
|
|
$
|
11.72
|
|
|
$
|
11.34
|
|
|
$
|
13.06
|
|
Stock sales price per share for the fiscal year ended
January 29, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
12.05
|
|
|
$
|
14.24
|
|
|
$
|
17.26
|
|
|
$
|
16.10
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
7.84
|
|
|
$
|
10.39
|
|
|
$
|
13.07
|
|
|
$
|
12.74
|
|
Holders
At March 4, 2011, there were 29,320 holders of record of Dell
common stock.
Dividends
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on shares of
our common stock and currently do not anticipate paying any cash
dividends in the immediate future. Any future determination to
pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of
Directors.
Purchases
of Common Stock
We have a share repurchase program that authorizes us to
purchase shares of common stock in order to increase shareholder
value and manage dilution resulting from shares issued under our
equity compensation plans. However, we do not currently have a
policy that requires the repurchase of common stock in
conjunction with share-based payment arrangements. The following
table sets forth information regarding our repurchases or
acquisitions of common stock during the fourth quarter of Fiscal
2011 and the remaining authorized amount of future purchases
under our share repurchase program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
Dollar Value of
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
Shares that May
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Average
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
Yet Be Purchased
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
Under the Plans or
|
Period
|
|
Purchased(a)
|
|
per Share
|
|
or
Programs(b)
|
|
Programs(b)
|
|
|
(in millions, except average price paid per share)
|
Repurchases from October 30, 2010 through November 26,
2010
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
3,884
|
|
Repurchases from November 27, 2010 through
December 24, 2010
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
13.52
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
3,743
|
|
Repurchases from December 25, 2010 through January 28,
2011
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
3,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
13.58
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
All shares repurchased during the
fourth quarter of Fiscal 2011 were purchased in open market
transactions.
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
On December 4, 2007, we
publicly announced that our Board of Directors had authorized a
share repurchase program for up to $10 billion of our
common stock over an unspecified amount of time.
|
20
Stock
Performance Graph
The following graph compares the cumulative total return on
Dells common stock during the last five fiscal years with
the S&P 500 Index and the Dow Jones US Computer Hardware
Index during the same period. The graph shows the value, at the
end of each of the last five fiscal years, of $100 invested in
Dell common stock or the indices on February 3, 2006, and
assumes the reinvestment of all dividends. The graph depicts the
change in the value of our common stock relative to the indices
at the end of each fiscal year and not for any interim period.
Historical stock price performance is not necessarily indicative
of future stock price performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
Dell Inc.
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
80.38
|
|
|
$
|
69.55
|
|
|
$
|
32.47
|
|
|
$
|
44.09
|
|
|
$
|
44.94
|
|
S&P 500
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
114.51
|
|
|
$
|
111.87
|
|
|
$
|
68.66
|
|
|
$
|
91.41
|
|
|
$
|
111.69
|
|
Dow Jones US Computer Hardware
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
114.49
|
|
|
$
|
119.24
|
|
|
$
|
77.73
|
|
|
$
|
133.10
|
|
|
$
|
188.56
|
|
21
ITEM 6
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data should be read in
conjunction with Part II
Item 7 Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and Part II Item 8
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data and are
derived from our audited consolidated financial statements
included in Part II
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data or in our previously filed Annual Reports on
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
February 1,
|
|
February 2,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share data)
|
Results of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
61,494
|
|
|
$
|
52,902
|
|
|
$
|
61,101
|
|
|
$
|
61,133
|
|
|
$
|
57,420
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
11,396
|
|
|
$
|
9,261
|
|
|
$
|
10,957
|
|
|
$
|
11,671
|
|
|
$
|
9,516
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
3,433
|
|
|
$
|
2,172
|
|
|
$
|
3,190
|
|
|
$
|
3,440
|
|
|
$
|
3,070
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
$
|
3,350
|
|
|
$
|
2,024
|
|
|
$
|
3,324
|
|
|
$
|
3,827
|
|
|
$
|
3,345
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2,635
|
|
|
$
|
1,433
|
|
|
$
|
2,478
|
|
|
$
|
2,947
|
|
|
$
|
2,583
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
$
|
1.33
|
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
Number of weighted-average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,944
|
|
|
|
1,954
|
|
|
|
1,980
|
|
|
|
2,223
|
|
|
|
2,255
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
|
|
1,986
|
|
|
|
2,247
|
|
|
|
2,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
3,969
|
|
|
$
|
3,906
|
|
|
$
|
1,894
|
|
|
$
|
3,949
|
|
|
$
|
3,969
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and investments
|
|
$
|
15,069
|
|
|
$
|
11,789
|
|
|
$
|
9,546
|
|
|
$
|
9,532
|
|
|
$
|
12,445
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
38,599
|
|
|
$
|
33,652
|
|
|
$
|
26,500
|
|
|
$
|
27,561
|
|
|
$
|
25,635
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
$
|
851
|
|
|
$
|
663
|
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
5,146
|
|
|
$
|
3,417
|
|
|
$
|
1,898
|
|
|
$
|
362
|
|
|
$
|
569
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
7,766
|
|
|
$
|
5,641
|
|
|
$
|
4,271
|
|
|
$
|
3,735
|
|
|
$
|
4,328
|
|
22
ITEM 7
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This
section should be read in conjunction with
Part II Item 8 Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
OVERVIEW
We are a leading integrated technology solutions provider in the
IT industry. We built our reputation through listening to
customers and developing solutions that meet customer needs. We
are focused on providing long-term value creation through the
delivery of customized solutions that make technology more
efficient, more accessible, and easier to use. Customer needs
are increasingly being defined by how they use technology rather
than where they use it, which is why our businesses are globally
organized. Our four global business segments are Large
Enterprise, Public, Small and Medium Business (SMB),
and Consumer. We also refer to our Large Enterprise, Public, and
SMB segments as Commercial. Our globally organized
business units reflect the impact of globalization on our
customer base.
A key component of our business strategy is to continue shifting
our portfolio to products and services that provide
higher-margin and recurring revenue streams over time. As part
of this strategy, we emphasize expansion of our enterprise
solutions and services. We group our services with similar
demand, economic and delivery profiles into three categories:
transactional; outsourcing; and project-based. Our enterprise
products include servers, networking, and storage products. The
growth of our enterprise solutions and services business has
contributed to improvements in our operating margins.
We are focusing on product leadership by developing next
generation capabilities for client products, which include our
mobility and desktop PC products. We employ a collaborative
approach to product design and development in which our
engineers, with direct customer input, design innovative
solutions and work with a global network of technology companies
to architect new system designs, influence the direction of
future development, and integrate new technologies into our
products. Through this collaborative, customer-focused approach,
we strive to deliver new and relevant products and services to
the market quickly and efficiently. We have also been focusing
on improving the profitability of our client products by
improving our supply chain execution and simplifying our product
offerings. The majority of our products are now produced by
contract manufacturers.
All regions of our global business experienced revenue increases
in Fiscal 2011. Emerging countries with a vast majority of the
worlds population represent some of our most attractive
growth markets. In recent years, we have increased our
investment in Brazil, Russia, India, and China and have tailored
our products and services to meet the specific needs of
customers in these countries.
We supplement organic growth with a disciplined acquisition
program targeting businesses that will expand our portfolio of
enterprise solutions offerings. We emphasize acquisitions of
companies with portfolios that we can leverage with our global
customer base and distribution. We followed our acquisition of
Perot Systems Corporation (Perot Systems) in late
Fiscal 2010 with a number of acquisitions throughout Fiscal
2011, which extended our core capabilities in a variety of
enterprise solutions offerings, including storage, systems
management appliances, virtual infrastructure management, SaaS
application integration, and cloud-based medical records
management. The comparability of our results of operations for
Fiscal 2011 compared to Fiscal 2010 and Fiscal 2009 are affected
by these acquisitions, primarily our acquisition and ongoing
integration of Perot Systems. See our Services discussion under
Results of Operations Revenue by
Product and Services Categories below for a comparison of
Dells Services revenue for Fiscal 2011 compared to the
prior years results of Dell Services and Perot Systems.
Presentation
of Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In this managements discussion and analysis, we use
supplemental measures of our performance, which are derived from
our consolidated financial information but which are not
presented in our consolidated financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAP). These financial
measures, which are considered non-GAAP financial
measures under SEC rules, include our non-GAAP gross
margin, non-GAAP operating expenses, non-GAAP operating income,
non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP earnings per share. See
Results of Operations
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
23
below for information about our use of these non-GAAP financial
measures, including our reasons for including the measures,
material limitations with respect to the usefulness of the
measures, and a reconciliation of each non-GAAP financial
measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Consolidated
Operations
The following table summarizes our consolidated results of
operations for each of the past three fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2010
|
|
|
|
January 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Change
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Change
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts and percentages)
|
Net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
50,002
|
|
|
|
81.3%
|
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
$
|
43,697
|
|
|
|
82.6%
|
|
|
|
(17%
|
)
|
|
$
|
52,337
|
|
|
|
85.7%
|
|
Services, including software related
|
|
|
11,492
|
|
|
|
18.7%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
9,205
|
|
|
|
17.4%
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
8,764
|
|
|
|
14.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
$
|
61,494
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
|
$
|
52,902
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
(13%
|
)
|
|
$
|
61,101
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
Gross margin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
7,934
|
|
|
|
15.9%
|
|
|
|
29%
|
|
|
$
|
6,163
|
|
|
|
14.1%
|
|
|
|
(20%
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,667
|
|
|
|
14.6%
|
|
Services, including software related
|
|
|
3,462
|
|
|
|
30.1%
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
3,098
|
|
|
|
33.7%
|
|
|
|
(6%
|
)
|
|
|
3,290
|
|
|
|
37.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross margin
|
|
$
|
11,396
|
|
|
|
18.5%
|
|
|
|
23%
|
|
|
$
|
9,261
|
|
|
|
17.5%
|
|
|
|
(15%
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,957
|
|
|
|
17.9%
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
$
|
7,963
|
|
|
|
12.9%
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
$
|
7,089
|
|
|
|
13.4%
|
|
|
|
(9%
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,767
|
|
|
|
12.7%
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
3,433
|
|
|
|
5.6%
|
|
|
|
58%
|
|
|
$
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
4.1%
|
|
|
|
(32%
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,190
|
|
|
|
5.2%
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2,635
|
|
|
|
4.3%
|
|
|
|
84%
|
|
|
$
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
2.7%
|
|
|
|
(42%
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,478
|
|
|
|
4.1%
|
|
Earnings per share diluted
|
|
$
|
1.35
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
85%
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(42%
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Other Financial
Information(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP gross margin
|
|
$
|
11,731
|
|
|
|
19.1%
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
|
$
|
9,649
|
|
|
|
18.2%
|
|
|
|
(14%
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,178
|
|
|
|
18.3%
|
|
Non-GAAP operating expenses
|
|
$
|
7,582
|
|
|
|
12.3%
|
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
$
|
6,675
|
|
|
|
12.6%
|
|
|
|
(11%
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,497
|
|
|
|
12.3%
|
|
Non-GAAP operating income
|
|
$
|
4,149
|
|
|
|
6.7%
|
|
|
|
40%
|
|
|
$
|
2,974
|
|
|
|
5.6%
|
|
|
|
(19%
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,681
|
|
|
|
6.0%
|
|
Non-GAAP net income
|
|
$
|
3,106
|
|
|
|
5.1%
|
|
|
|
51%
|
|
|
$
|
2,054
|
|
|
|
3.9%
|
|
|
|
(28%
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,852
|
|
|
|
4.7%
|
|
Non-GAAP earnings per share diluted
|
|
$
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
51%
|
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(27%
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP
operating expenses, non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP net
income, and non-GAAP earnings per share are not measurements of
financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. See
Non-GAAP Financial Measures below for
information about these non-GAAP financial measures, including
our reasons for including the measures, material limitations
with respect to the usefulness of the measures, and a
reconciliation of each non-GAAP financial measure to the most
directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
|
During Fiscal 2011, our total net revenue increased 16%
year-over-year
with increases across all our Commercial segments, and a slight
increase in our Consumer segment. Commercial segments increased
20%
year-over-year,
and represented approximately 80% of our total net revenue
during Fiscal 2011. The recovery in the economy during Fiscal
2011 helped strengthen demand from our Commercial customers as
the corporate refresh cycle continued, particularly for our
Large Enterprise and SMB customers. Demand from our Consumer
customers softened during late Fiscal 2011 compared to late
Fiscal 2010 when the launch of Windows 7 increased demand for
our Consumer client products.
Our profitability has been improving sequentially for the past
four quarters, with stronger results in the latter half of
Fiscal 2011. The improving profitability was in part due to
growth in our enterprise solutions and services business. For
Fiscal 2011, enterprise solutions and services revenue,
including the contribution from Perot Systems, grew 27%
year-over-year
to $17.6 billion, and gross margins generated from this
category grew 24%
year-over-year.
We believe these solutions are customized to the needs of users,
easy to use, and affordable. We have also improved profitability
in our client product business by simplifying our product
offerings, optimizing our supply chain, and improving pricing
discipline during this period of favorable component cost
environment. We will remain focused on profitability by
continuing our efforts to provide IT solutions to our customers
in areas such as enterprise solutions and services, and will
continue to utilize our flexible supply chain to enhance the
profitability of our client products.
24
Revenue
Fiscal
2011 compared to Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
Product Revenue Product revenue
increased
year-over-year
by 14% for Fiscal 2011. Our product revenue performance was
primarily attributable to improved customer demand as a result
of increased global IT spending from our Commercial customers
across all product categories as well as a shift in mix to
higher priced products. See Revenue by Product and
Services Categories for further information regarding the
average selling prices of our products.
|
|
|
Services Revenue, including software
related Services revenue, including software
related increased
year-over-year
by 25% for Fiscal 2011. Our services revenue performance was
attributable to a 36%
year-over-year
increase in services revenue and an increase of 7% in software
related services revenue during Fiscal 2011. The increase in
services revenue was primarily due to our acquisition of Perot
Systems in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2010, which was
integrated into our Public and Large Enterprise segments.
|
During Fiscal 2011, revenue from the U.S. increased 14% to
$31.9 billion and represented 52% of total net revenue.
Revenue from outside the U.S. increased 19% to
$29.6 billion and represented 48% of total net revenue.
Revenue from Brazil, Russia, India, and China, which we refer to
as BRIC, increased 38%
year-over-year,
on a combined basis, for Fiscal 2011. Total revenue from BRIC
has been increasing sequentially since the fourth quarter of
Fiscal 2009 and represented 12.3% of our total net revenue for
Fiscal 2011 compared to 10.5% in the prior year. We are
continuing to expand into these and other emerging countries
that represent the vast majority of the worlds population,
tailor solutions to meet specific regional needs, and enhance
relationships to provide customer choice and flexibility.
We manage our business on a U.S. dollar basis and utilize a
comprehensive hedging strategy intended to mitigate the impact
of foreign currency volatility over time. As a result of our
hedging programs, the impact of currency movements was not
material to our total net revenue for Fiscal 2011, Fiscal 2010,
or Fiscal 2009.
Fiscal
2010 compared to Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
Product Revenue Product revenue and
unit shipments decreased
year-over-year
by 17% and 6%, respectively, for Fiscal 2010. Our product
revenue performance was primarily attributable to a decrease in
customer demand from our Commercial segments and lower average
selling prices in our Consumer segment.
|
|
|
Services Revenue, including software
related Services revenue, including software
related increased
year-over-year
by 5% during Fiscal 2010. The increase in services revenue was
largely due to our acquisition of Perot Systems, which
contributed $588 million in services revenue during the
fourth quarter of Fiscal 2010. Excluding the contribution by
Perot Systems, services revenue decreased 2%. Our service
offerings have traditionally been tied to the sale of hardware;
therefore, the 6% decline in hardware demand negatively impacted
our services revenue.
|
Outside the U.S., we experienced a 16%
year-over-year
revenue decline for Fiscal 2010 compared to an approximate
decline of 11% in revenue for the U.S. during the same period.
Revenue outside the U.S. represented approximately 47% of net
revenue for Fiscal 2010. At a consolidated level, BRIC revenue
increased 4% during Fiscal 2010.
Gross
Margin
Fiscal
2011 compared to Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
Products During Fiscal 2011, product
gross margins increased in absolute dollars
year-over-year
and in gross margin percentage. Product gross margin percentage
increased from 14.1% for Fiscal 2010 to 15.9% for Fiscal 2011.
Decreasing component costs, improved pricing discipline, better
sales and supply chain execution, and improved quality resulting
in favorable warranty experience contributed to the
year-over-year
increase in product gross margin percentage. We have created a
flexible supply chain that has improved our supply chain
execution and have simplified our product offerings.
Additionally, in the second half of Fiscal 2011, we began to
|
25
|
|
|
benefit from decreasing component costs, particularly for memory
and displays. We expect this favorable component cost
environment will moderate in the first half of Fiscal 2012.
|
|
|
|
Services, including software related
During Fiscal 2011, our services gross margin increased in
absolute dollars compared to the prior fiscal year, although our
gross margin percentage decreased. The decrease in gross margin
percentage for services, including software related was
primarily due to a higher mix of outsourcing and project-related
services. Our gross margin rate for services, including software
related, is driven by our transactional services, which consist
primarily of our extended warranty sales, offset by lower margin
categories such as outsourcing and project-related services. Our
extended warranty services are more profitable because we sell
extended warranty offerings directly to customers rather than
through a distribution channel.
|
Total gross margin for Fiscal 2011 increased 23% to
$11.4 billion on a GAAP basis and 22% to $11.7 billion
on a non-GAAP basis from Fiscal 2010. Gross margin on a GAAP
basis for Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010 includes the effects of
amortization of intangible assets, severance and facility action
costs, and acquisition-related charges. As set forth in the
reconciliation under Non-GAAP Financial
Measures below, these items are excluded from the
calculation of non-GAAP gross margin for Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal
2010. Amortization of intangible assets included in gross margin
increased 84% to $278 million for Fiscal 2011. The increase
in amortization of intangibles for Fiscal 2011 was primarily due
to an increase in intangible assets of $1.2 billion in
Fiscal 2010 related to our acquisition of Perot Systems.
Severance and facility action costs included in gross margin
decreased 78% to $53 million during Fiscal 2011. The
decrease in severance and facility action costs was due to a
decrease in cost reduction activities from Fiscal 2010. While we
believe that we have completed a significant portion of our
manufacturing transformation, we expect to implement additional
cost reduction measures depending on a number of factors,
including end-user demand for our products and services and the
continued simplification of our sales organizations and supply
and logistics chain. Additional cost reduction measures may
include selected headcount reductions, as well as other cost
reduction programs.
Fiscal
2010 compared to Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
Products Product gross margin
decreased in absolute dollars and in gross margin percentage
during Fiscal 2010. The decline in gross margin dollars was
attributable to softer demand, change in sales mix, and lower
average selling prices. Additionally, during Fiscal 2010, gross
margins were negatively impacted by component cost pressures.
|
|
|
Services, including software related
During Fiscal 2010, our services gross margin decreased in
absolute dollars compared to the prior fiscal year with a
corresponding decrease in gross margin percentage. Our solution
services offerings faced competitive pricing pressures,
resulting in lower gross margin percentages.
|
Total gross margin for Fiscal 2010 decreased 15% to
$9.3 billion on a GAAP basis and 14% to $9.6 billion
on a non-GAAP basis from Fiscal 2009. Gross margin on a GAAP
basis for Fiscal 2010 includes the effects of severance and
facility action costs, amortization of intangible assets, and
acquisition-related charges. Gross margin on a GAAP basis for
Fiscal 2009 includes the effects of severance and facility
action costs, amortization of intangible assets, and stock
option accelerated vesting charges. As set forth in the
reconciliation under Non-GAAP Financial
Measures below, these items are excluded from the
calculation of non-GAAP gross margin for Fiscal 2010 and Fiscal
2009. Amortization of intangible assets included in gross margin
increased 156% to $151 million for Fiscal 2010. The
increase in amortization of intangibles for Fiscal 2010 was
primarily due to an increase in intangible assets from our
acquisition of Perot Systems in Fiscal 2010 discussed above.
Severance and facility action costs included in gross margin
increased 62% to $236 million during Fiscal 2010 due to our
migration to contract manufacturers and closures of certain
manufacturing facilities. For Fiscal 2009, we incurred
$104 million in certain stock-based compensation charges
related to accelerated options that had an exercise price
greater than the current market stock price. Included in gross
margin on a GAAP basis is $16 million from these stock
option accelerated vesting charges, which are excluded from the
calculation of our non-GAAP gross margin. We did not have any
accelerated stock option expenses in Fiscal 2010.
26
Vendor
Rebate Programs
Our gross margin is affected by our ability to achieve
competitive pricing with our vendors and contract manufacturers,
including through our negotiation of a variety of vendor rebate
programs to achieve lower net costs for the various components
we include in our products. Under these programs, vendors
provide us with rebates or other discounts from the list prices
for the components, which are generally elements of their
pricing strategy. Vendor rebate programs are only one element of
the costs we negotiate for our product components. We account
for rebates and other discounts as a reduction in cost of net
revenue. Our total net cost includes supplier list prices
reduced by vendor rebates and other discounts. We manage our
costs on a total net cost basis.
The terms and conditions of our vendor rebate programs are
largely based on product volumes and are generally not long-term
in nature, but instead are typically negotiated at the beginning
of each quarter. Because of the fluid nature of these ongoing
negotiations, which reflect changes in the competitive
environment, the timing and amount of rebates and other
discounts we receive under the programs may vary from period to
period. Since we manage our component costs on a total net cost
basis, any fluctuations in the timing and amount of rebates and
other discounts we receive from vendors may not necessarily
result in material changes to our gross margin. We monitor our
component costs and seek to address the effects of any changes
to terms that might arise under our vendor rebate programs. Our
gross margins for Fiscal 2011, Fiscal 2010, and Fiscal 2009,
were not materially affected by any changes to the terms of our
vendor rebate programs, as the amounts we received under these
programs were generally stable relative to our total net cost.
We are not aware of any significant programmatic changes to
vendor pricing and rebate programs that will impact our results
in the near term.
We will continue to invest in initiatives that align our new and
existing products and services with customers needs,
particularly for enterprise products and solutions. As we shift
our focus more to enterprise solutions and services, we believe
the improved mix of higher margin sales will positively impact
our gross margins over time.
Operating
Expenses
The following table presents information regarding our operating
expenses during each of the past three fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2010
|
|
|
|
January 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Change
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Change
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative
|
|
$
|
7,302
|
|
|
|
11.9%
|
|
|
|
13%
|
|
|
$
|
6,465
|
|
|
|
12.2%
|
|
|
|
(9%
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,102
|
|
|
|
11.6%
|
|
Research, development, and engineering
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
|
|
6%
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
1.2%
|
|
|
|
(6%
|
)
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
1.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$
|
7,963
|
|
|
|
12.9%
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
$
|
7,089
|
|
|
|
13.4%
|
|
|
|
(9%
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,767
|
|
|
|
12.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP operating
expenses(a)
|
|
$
|
7,582
|
|
|
|
12.3%
|
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
$
|
6,675
|
|
|
|
12.6%
|
|
|
|
(11%
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,497
|
|
|
|
12.3%
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
For a reconciliation of non-GAAP
operating expenses to operating expenses prepared in accordance
with GAAP, see Non-GAAP Financial Measures
below.
|
Fiscal
2011 compared to Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
Selling, General, and Administrative
During Fiscal 2011, selling, general, and administrative
(SG&A) expenses increased
year-over-year,
while SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenue
decreased. The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily
attributable to increases in compensation-related expenses and
advertising and promotional expenses. Compensation-related
expenses, excluding severance-related expenses, increased
approximately $679 million due to an increase in
performance-based compensation expense, which is tied to revenue
and operating income growth, and cash flow targets, and an
increase in headcount. Our headcount increased approximately 6%
due to our acquisitions and new hires relating to our strategic
initiatives. We also experienced a
year-over-year
increase of $111 million in advertising and promotional
expenses. These increases were offset in part by decreases in
severance and facility action costs and acquisition-related
expenses discussed below.
|
27
|
|
|
Research, Development, and Engineering
During Fiscal 2011, research, development, and engineering
(RD&E) expenses remained at approximately 1% of
revenue, consistent with the prior fiscal year. We manage our
research, development, and engineering spending by targeting
those innovations and products that we believe are most valuable
to our customers and by relying upon the capabilities of our
strategic relationships. We will continue to invest in RD&E
activities to support our growth and to provide for new,
competitive products.
|
Total operating expenses for Fiscal 2011 increased 12% to
$8.0 billion on a GAAP basis and 14% to $7.6 billion
on a non-GAAP basis for Fiscal 2011 over Fiscal 2010. Operating
expenses on a GAAP basis for Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010
includes severance and facility charges, amortization of
intangible assets, and acquisition-related charges. For Fiscal
2011, operating expenses on a GAAP basis also includes
$100 million we incurred for our settlement of the SEC
investigation and a $40 million charge for a securities
litigation class action lawsuit that was filed against Dell
during Fiscal 2007. See Part II
Item 9A Controls and Procedures for
further discussion of our settlement of the SEC investigation.
As set forth in the reconciliation under
Non-GAAP Financial Measures below, non-GAAP
operating expenses for Fiscal 2011 and for Fiscal 2010 excludes
the effects of these severance and facility action costs,
amortization of intangible assets, and acquisition-related
charges, and, for Fiscal 2011, the settlements referred to
above. Severance and facility action costs included in operating
expenses decreased
year-over-year
by 69% to $76 million for Fiscal 2011. Amortization of
intangibles and acquisition-related charges included in
operating expenses increased 31% to $71 million and
decreased 18% to $94 million over Fiscal 2010,
respectively, and were primarily related to our acquisition of
Perot Systems in Fiscal 2010 as well as our Fiscal 2011
acquisitions.
We expect integration costs related to our acquisitions,
primarily of Perot Systems, to continue over the next fiscal
years. In addition, we will continue to review our costs across
all processes and organizations with the goals of reducing
complexity and eliminating redundancies. While we have made
significant progress in the transformation of our manufacturing
and logistics areas, we expect to take further actions to reduce
costs while investing in strategic growth areas.
Fiscal
2010 compared to Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
Selling, General, and Administrative
For Fiscal 2010, SG&A expenses decreased compared to
Fiscal 2009 primarily due to decreases in compensation,
advertising expenses, and improved general spending controls.
Compensation and benefits expense, excluding expenses related to
headcount reductions, decreased approximately $300 million
in Fiscal 2010 compared to Fiscal 2009. With the increase in
retail volumes, which typically incur less advertising costs,
advertising expenses decreased approximately $200 million
year-over-year
from Fiscal 2009. Due to company-wide spending control measures,
there were large decreases in most other categories of expenses,
including travel, maintenance, telecommunications, utilities,
training, and recruiting, resulting in savings of over
$340 million. These decreases were partially offset by an
increase in accounts receivable bad debt of $40 million
resulting from the challenging business environment during
Fiscal 2010.
|
|
|
Research, Development, and Engineering
For Fiscal 2010, RD&E expenses remained at
approximately 1% of revenue, consistent with prior years.
|
Total operating expenses for Fiscal 2010 decreased 9% to
$7.1 billion on a GAAP basis and 11% to $6.7 billion
on a non-GAAP basis from Fiscal 2009. Operating expenses on a
GAAP basis for Fiscal 2010 includes the effects of severance and
facility action costs, acquisition-related charges, and
amortization of intangible assets. For Fiscal 2009, operating
expenses on a GAAP basis includes the effects of severance and
facility action costs, amortization of intangible assets, and
stock option accelerated vesting charges. As set forth in the
reconciliation under Non-GAAP Financial
Measures below, these charges are excluded from operating
expenses on a non-GAAP basis. Severance and facility action
costs included in operating expenses increased 80% to
$245 million in Fiscal 2010. Acquisition-related charges
and amortization of intangibles included in operating expenses
increased from $0 to $115 million for Fiscal 2010 and 17%
to $54 million for Fiscal 2010. Operating expenses for
amortization of intangible assets and acquisition-related costs
were primarily related to our acquisition of Perot Systems in
Fiscal 2010. Non-GAAP operating expenses for Fiscal 2009
excluded $88 million in stock option accelerated vesting
charges.
28
Operating
and Net Income
Fiscal
2011 compared to Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
Operating Income During Fiscal 2011,
operating income increased 58% to $3.4 billion on a GAAP
basis and 40% to $4.1 billion on a non-GAAP basis from
Fiscal 2010. The increases were primarily attributable to
increased revenue, improved gross margins, and better operating
leverage resulting from the increase in net revenue. For Fiscal
2011, operating expenses increased 12% on a GAAP basis and 14%
on a non-GAAP basis, while operating expenses as a percentage of
revenue decreased slightly.
|
|
|
Net Income During Fiscal 2011, net
income increased 84% to $2.6 billion on a GAAP basis and
51% to $3.1 billion on a non-GAAP basis from Fiscal 2010.
Net income was positively impacted by increases in operating
income and a lower effective income tax rate. In addition, on a
GAAP basis, Interest and Other, net increased favorably by 44%
for Fiscal 2011 due primarily to a $72 million merger
termination fee we received during the third quarter of Fiscal
2011. See Income and Other Taxes and Interest
and Other, net below for discussion of our effective tax
rates and interest and other, net.
|
Fiscal
2010 compared to Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
Operating Income During Fiscal 2010,
operating income decreased 32% to $2.2 billion on a GAAP
basis and 19% to $3.0 billion on a non-GAAP basis from
Fiscal 2009. The decreases in operating income were primarily
attributable to a
year-over-year
revenue decline of 13% and a
year-over-year
decline in gross margin dollars on both a GAAP and non-GAAP
basis. A
year-over-year
reduction in operating expenses on a GAAP and non-GAAP basis
during Fiscal 2010 favorably impacted operating income, while
operating expenses as a percentage of revenue increased slightly
during the same periods.
|
|
|
Net Income Net income for Fiscal 2010
decreased by 42% to $1.4 billion on a GAAP basis and 28% to
$2.1 billion on a non-GAAP basis from Fiscal 2009. Net
income was impacted by significant declines in operating income
and an unfavorable change in interest and other, net in Fiscal
2010 compared to Fiscal 2009. During Fiscal 2010 as compared to
Fiscal 2009, our net income on a GAAP basis was negatively
impacted by an increase in our effective income tax rate to
29.2% from 25.4%. See Income and Other Taxes and
Interest and Other, net below for discussion of our
effective tax rates and interest and other, net.
|
Non-GAAP Financial
Measures
We use non-GAAP financial measures in this Report as performance
measures to supplement the financial information we present on a
GAAP basis. We believe that excluding certain items from our
GAAP results allows our management and investors to better
understand our consolidated financial performance from period to
period and in relationship to the operating results of our
segments, as our management does not believe that the excluded
items are reflective of our underlying operating performance. We
also believe that excluding certain items from our GAAP results
allows our management to better project our future consolidated
financial performance because our forecasts are developed at a
level of detail different from that used to prepare GAAP-based
financial measures. Moreover, we believe the non-GAAP financial
measures provide investors with useful information to help them
evaluate our operating results by facilitating an enhanced
understanding of our underlying operating performance and
enabling them to make more meaningful period to period
comparisons.
The non-GAAP financial measures presented in this Report include
non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating expenses, non-GAAP
operating income, non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP earnings per
share. These non-GAAP financial measures, as defined by us,
represent the comparable GAAP financial measures adjusted to
exclude primarily the following items: acquisition-related
charges; amortization of purchased intangible assets related to
acquisitions; severance and facility action costs; accelerated
stock option expenses that were incurred in Fiscal 2009, a
merger termination fee that was received during the third
quarter of Fiscal 2011; and amounts for the settlement of the
SEC investigation, as well as the settlement of a securities
litigation matter, which were incurred during the first quarter
of Fiscal 2011. We provide below more detail regarding each of
these items and our reasons for excluding the items. In future
periods, we expect that we may again exclude such items and may
incur income and expenses similar to these excluded items.
Accordingly, the exclusion of these items and other similar
items in our non-GAAP presentation should not be interpreted as
implying that the items are non-recurring, infrequent, or
unusual.
29
There are limitations to the use of the non-GAAP financial
measures presented in this Report. Our non-GAAP financial
measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of
other companies. Other companies, including companies in our
industry, may calculate the non-GAAP financial measures
differently than we do, limiting the usefulness of those
measures for comparative purposes. In addition, items such as
amortization of purchased intangible assets represent the loss
in value of intangible assets over time. The expense associated
with this loss in value is not included in the non-GAAP
financial measures and such measures, therefore, do not reflect
the full economic effect of such loss. Further, items such as
severance and facility action costs and acquisition expenses
that are excluded from the non-GAAP financial measures can have
a material impact on earnings. Our management compensates for
the foregoing limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP
results and using non-GAAP financial measures only
supplementally or for projections when comparable GAAP financial
measures are not available. The non-GAAP financial measures are
not meant to be considered as indicators of performance in
isolation from or as a substitute for gross margin, operating
expenses, operating income, net income, and earnings per share
prepared in accordance with GAAP, and should be read only in
conjunction with financial information presented on a GAAP
basis. We provide below reconciliations of each non-GAAP
financial measure to its most directly comparable GAAP financial
measure, and encourage you to review the reconciliations in
conjunction with the presentation of the non-GAAP financial
measures for each of the past three fiscal years.
The following is a summary of the costs and other items excluded
from the most comparable GAAP financial measures to calculate
the non-GAAP financial measures presented in this
managements discussion and analysis:
|
|
|
Acquisition-related Costs Acquisition-related
charges are expensed as incurred and consist primarily of
retention payments, integration costs, bankers fees, legal
fees, and consulting fees. Retention payments include
stock-based compensation and cash incentives awarded to
employees, which are recognized over the vesting period.
Integration costs include incremental business costs that are
directly attributable to the acquisition of Perot Systems during
the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2010 and are being incurred during
the integration period. These costs primarily include IT costs
related to the integration of IT systems and processes, costs
related to the integration of Perot Systems employees, costs
related to full-time employees who are working on the
integration, and consulting expenses. Acquisition-related
charges are inconsistent in amount and are significantly
impacted by the timing and nature of acquisitions. Therefore,
although we may incur these types of expenses in connection with
future acquisitions, we believe eliminating acquisition-related
charges for purposes of calculating the non-GAAP financial
measures facilitates a more meaningful evaluation of our current
operating performance and comparisons to our past operating
performance.
|
|
|
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Amortization of purchased intangible assets consists
primarily of amortization of customer relationships, customer
lists, acquired technology, trade names, and non-compete
covenants purchased in connection with business acquisitions. We
incur charges relating to the amortization of these intangibles,
and those charges are included in our consolidated financial
statements. Amortization charges for our purchased intangible
assets are inconsistent in amount from period to period and are
significantly impacted by the timing and magnitude of our
acquisitions. Consequently, we exclude these charges for
purposes of calculating the non-GAAP financial measures to
facilitate a more meaningful evaluation of our current operating
performance and comparisons to our past operating performance.
|
|
|
Severance and Facility Actions Severance and
facility action costs primarily relate to facilities charges,
including accelerated depreciation and severance and benefits
for employees terminated pursuant to actions taken as part of a
comprehensive review of costs, including certain employee cost
synergies realized through our strategic acquisitions. While we
expect to continue to incur severance and facility costs with
any new cost reduction activities, we exclude these severance
and facility action costs for purposes of calculating the
non-GAAP financial measures because we believe that these
historical costs do not reflect expected future operating
expenses and do not contribute to a meaningful evaluation of our
current operating performance or comparisons to our past
operating performance. See Note 10 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II
Item 8 Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data for additional
information on severance and facility action costs.
|
|
|
Other Fees and Settlements We also adjust our
GAAP results for certain fees and settlements. During Fiscal
2011, we received a $72 million fee in connection with the
termination of a merger agreement. We also recorded
|
30
|
|
|
a $100 million settlement amount for the SEC investigation
into certain of Dells accounting and financial matters,
which was initiated in 2005, and incurred $40 million for a
securities litigation class action lawsuit that was filed
against us during Fiscal 2007. We are excluding these fees and
settlements from the operating results of Fiscal 2011 for the
purpose of calculating the non-GAAP financial measures because
we believe these fees and settlements, while not unusual, are
outside our ordinary course of business and do not contribute to
a meaningful evaluation of our current operating performance.
|
|
|
|
Stock Option Accelerated Vesting Charges
Certain stock-based compensation charges incurred during
Fiscal 2009 related to the accelerated vesting of unvested
out-of-the-money
stock options (options that have an exercise price greater
than the current market stock price) are excluded from the
non-GAAP financial measures. Stock-based compensation costs
unrelated to the accelerated vesting of
out-of-the-money
stock options are not excluded from the non-GAAP financial
measures. We exclude charges related to the accelerated vesting
of
out-of-the-money
stock options because we believe they do not contribute to a
meaningful comparison of our past operating results to our
current operating results.
|
|
|
The aggregate adjustment for income taxes is the estimated
combined income tax effect for the adjustments mentioned above.
The tax effects are determined based on the jurisdictions where
the adjustments were incurred.
|
31
The table below presents a reconciliation of our non-GAAP
financial measures to the most comparable GAAP measure for each
of the past three fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
% Change
|
|
2010
|
|
% Change
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
GAAP gross margin
|
|
$
|
11,396
|
|
|
|
23%
|
|
|
$
|
9,261
|
|
|
|
(15%
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,957
|
|
Non-GAAP adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Severance and facility actions
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
Acquisition-related
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Stock-option accelerated vesting charges
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP gross margin
|
|
$
|
11,731
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
|
$
|
9,649
|
|
|
|
(14%
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP operating expenses
|
|
$
|
7,963
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
$
|
7,089
|
|
|
|
(9%
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,767
|
|
Non-GAAP adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Severance and facility actions
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
Acquisition-related
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Stock-option accelerated vesting charges
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
Other fees and settlements
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP operating expenses
|
|
$
|
7,582
|
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
$
|
6,675
|
|
|
|
(11%
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP operating income
|
|
$
|
3,433
|
|
|
|
58%
|
|
|
$
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
(32%
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,190
|
|
Non-GAAP adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
Severance and facility actions
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
Acquisition-related
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Stock-option accelerated vesting charges
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Other fees and settlements
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP operating income
|
|
$
|
4,149
|
|
|
|
40%
|
|
|
$
|
2,974
|
|
|
|
(19%
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP net income
|
|
$
|
2,635
|
|
|
|
84%
|
|
|
$
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
(42%
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,478
|
|
Non-GAAP adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
Severance and facility actions
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
Acquisition-related
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Stock-option accelerated vesting charges
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Other fees and settlements
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Aggregate adjustments for income taxes
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP net income
|
|
$
|
3,106
|
|
|
|
51%
|
|
|
$
|
2,054
|
|
|
|
(28%
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP earnings per share diluted
|
|
$
|
1.35
|
|
|
|
85%
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
|
(42%
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
Non-GAAP adjustments per share diluted
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP earnings per share diluted
|
|
$
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
51%
|
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
|
(27%
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Percentage of Total Net Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP gross margin
|
|
|
18.5%
|
|
|
|
17.5%
|
|
|
|
17.9%
|
|
Non-GAAP adjustments
|
|
|
0.6%
|
|
|
|
0.7%
|
|
|
|
0.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP gross margin
|
|
|
19.1%
|
|
|
|
18.2%
|
|
|
|
18.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP operating expenses
|
|
|
12.9%
|
|
|
|
13.4%
|
|
|
|
12.7%
|
|
Non-GAAP adjustments
|
|
|
(0.6%
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8%
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4%
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP operating expenses
|
|
|
12.3%
|
|
|
|
12.6%
|
|
|
|
12.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP operating income
|
|
|
5.6%
|
|
|
|
4.1%
|
|
|
|
5.2%
|
|
Non-GAAP adjustments
|
|
|
1.1%
|
|
|
|
1.5%
|
|
|
|
0.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP operating income
|
|
|
6.7%
|
|
|
|
5.6%
|
|
|
|
6.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
Discussion
Our four global business segments are Large Enterprise, Public,
Small and Medium Business, and Consumer.
Severance and facility action expenses, broad based long-term
incentive expenses, amortization of purchased intangible assets
costs, acquisition-related expenses, and charges related to our
settlement of the SEC investigation as well as a securities
litigation class action lawsuit that were incurred during Fiscal
2011, are not allocated to the reporting segments as management
does not believe that these items are reflective of the
underlying operating performance of the reporting segments.
These costs totaled $1.1 billion, $1.2 billion, and
$805 million during Fiscal 2011, Fiscal 2010, and Fiscal
2009, respectively.
See Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
included in Part II
Item 8 Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data for additional information and
reconciliation of segment revenue and operating income to
consolidated revenue and operating income.
The following table presents our net revenue and operating
income by our reportable global segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2010
|
|
|
|
January 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue(a)
|
|
Change
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue(a)
|
|
Change
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue(a)
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Large Enterprise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
17,813
|
|
|
|
29%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
$
|
14,285
|
|
|
|
27%
|
|
|
|
(21%
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,011
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
1,473
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
|
80%
|
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
|
|
6%
|
|
|
|
(29%
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,158
|
|
|
|
6%
|
|
Public
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
16,851
|
|
|
|
27%
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
|
$
|
14,484
|
|
|
|
27%
|
|
|
|
(6%
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,338
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
1,484
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
$
|
1,361
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
$
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
Small and Medium Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
14,473
|
|
|
|
24%
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
$
|
12,079
|
|
|
|
23%
|
|
|
|
(19%
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,892
|
|
|
|
24%
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
1,477
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
42%
|
|
|
$
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
(18%
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,273
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
12,357
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
3%
|
|
|
$
|
12,054
|
|
|
|
23%
|
|
|
|
(6%
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,860
|
|
|
|
21%
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
(39%
|
)
|
|
$
|
107
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
(65%
|
)
|
|
$
|
306
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Operating income percentage of
revenue is stated in relation to the respective segment.
|
33
Fiscal
2011 compared to Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
Large Enterprise The
year-over-year
increase in Large Enterprises revenue for Fiscal 2011 was
mainly attributable to improved demand due to an ongoing
hardware refresh among our Large Enterprise customers. Large
Enterprise experienced
year-over-year
increases in revenue across all product lines during Fiscal
2011, except for storage revenue, which declined 5%. The
decrease in storage revenue is primarily due to a decrease in
the sale of third-party storage products as we shift towards
more Dell-branded storage solutions. Revenue from servers and
networking and services increased 33% and 35%, respectively. The
increase in services revenue was largely due to the acquisition
of Perot Systems in Fiscal 2010. Sales of client products
generated large revenue increases with mobility and desktop PCs
revenue increasing 33% and 25%,
year-over-year,
respectively. During Fiscal 2011, Large Enterprises
revenue increased
year-over-year
across all regions.
|
During Fiscal 2011, operating income as a percentage of revenue
increased 260 basis points
year-over-year
to 8.3%. The increase was mostly driven by improvements in gross
margin due to a shift in gross margin mix to enterprise
solutions and services, improved component costs, better product
quality, and improved pricing discipline, particularly in the
latter half of Fiscal 2011 for client products. Revenue
increases and tighter spending controls on operating expenses
resulted in a decrease in operating expenses as a percentage of
net revenue.
|
|
|
Public During Fiscal 2011, Public
experienced a
year-over-year
increase in revenue across all product and service categories.
Services contributed the largest increase, with a 69% increase
in revenue over the prior year. The increase in services revenue
was primarily a result of our acquisition of Perot Systems in
Fiscal 2010. Revenue from servers and networking and storage
increased 15% and 8%
year-over-year,
respectively. Software and peripherals revenue increased 10%
year-over-year.
Revenue from mobility and desktop PCs increased 5% and 6%
year-over-year,
respectively. Publics revenue grew during Fiscal 2011
across the Americas and the Asia-Pacific region, but declined in
Europe due to budgetary constraints on public spending.
|
Publics operating income percentage declined 60 basis
points to 8.8% for Fiscal 2011 due to a
year-over-year
increase in operating expenses as a percentage of revenue,
offset in part by a slight increase in gross margin percentage.
The increase in operating expenses was a result of higher
selling and marketing costs.
|
|
|
Small and Medium Business During
Fiscal 2011, SMB experienced a
year-over-year
increase in revenue with increases across all product and
services categories. Servers and networking, and storage revenue
increased 26% and 21%
year-over-year,
respectively. Revenue from mobility and desktop PCs increased
20% and 23%
year-over-year,
respectively, while software and peripherals revenue increased
16%
year-over-year.
The improved demand environment was a major contributor to the
increase in revenue for all product categories. Services revenue
increased 6%
year-over-year.
SMB revenue experienced
year-over-year
growth across all regions during Fiscal 2011. SMB revenue from
BRIC grew 40%
year-over-year.
|
Operating income percentage increased 160 basis points to
10.2%. The increase in operating income percentage was
attributable to improved gross margins as a result of lower
component costs and an improved pricing environment, as well as
to a decrease in operating expenses as a percentage of revenue
due to tighter spending controls.
|
|
|
Consumer Consumers revenue
increased 3%
year-over-year
during Fiscal 201l. Revenue from all product and services
categories decreased
year-over-year
for Fiscal 2011, except mobility. Consumer mobility revenue
increased by 8%
year-over-year,
due to increase of 8% in mobility units sold, while revenue from
desktops PCs decreased by 1% due to a decline in desktop PC
units of 2%. Average selling prices for Consumer mobility and
desktop PCs were relatively flat
year-over-year
during Fiscal 2011. The increase in mobility revenue was due to
improved unit demand for Consumer mobility products. Consumer
services decreased 11%
year-over-year
and software and peripherals revenue decreased 10% for the same
period. We continue to see a shift in sales mix from direct to
retail sales. which typically has lower attach rates for
services and software and peripherals. At a country level, our
U.S. Consumer revenue decreased 9%
year-over-year
due to softer demand, while our
non-U.S. regions
experienced 16% revenue growth. Revenue from BRIC grew 46%
year-over-year
for Fiscal 2011.
|
34
For Fiscal 2011, Consumers operating income percentage
decreased 40 basis points
year-over-year
to 0.5%. The decrease in operating income percentage was largely
attributable to a decrease in gross margin percentage. Consumer
gross margin decreased due to the shift in sales mix from direct
to indirect sales, which generally carry lower gross margin,
which was not entirely offset by decreases in operating expenses
as a percentage of revenue. Operating expenses as a percentage
of revenue remained relatively flat
year-over-year.
In the second half of Fiscal 2011, Dell Financial Services,
which provides financing to our customers, experienced improved
delinquency and charge-off rates that partially offset the
decrease in Consumers operating income percentage. During
the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, we combined Consumer and SMB
under a single leadership team to reduce overall costs, though
we are continuing to manage and report the two segments
separately. From time to time, we monetize aspects of the
Consumer business model with arrangements with vendors and
suppliers, such as revenue sharing arrangements, which we
believe will continue to contribute to and improve
Consumers operating income over time. The impact of our
vendor and supplier arrangements was not material to our Fiscal
2011 results as compared to Fiscal 2010.
We expect to see the broad corporate refresh to continue for our
Large Enterprise and SMB customers, with a favorable component
cost environment that will continue through the first half of
Fiscal 2012. We believe that, with the appropriate pricing
strategy, we will continue to have opportunities to deliver
strong
year-over-year
growth for our Large Enterprise and SMB segments. We expect that
the Public segment will see growth, but that certain regions
will continue to be impacted by budgetary constraints given the
current economic environment. For our Consumer segment, we will
continue to develop new products to move back to a mix of higher
price band offerings, improve our supply chain, and focus on
delivering a superior customer service experience to position
our Consumer business for sustained profitable growth.
Fiscal
2010 compared to Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
Large Enterprise The decrease in Large
Enterprise revenue during Fiscal 2010 was mainly due to the
global economic downturn that began in the second half of Fiscal
2009. During Fiscal 2010, revenue from desktop PCs, mobility
products, and storage items all declined approximately 30%
year-over-year,
and software and peripherals and servers and networking declined
19% and 4%, respectively. Services revenue increased
year-over-year
by 2%, which was largely due to the 48% increase in fourth
quarter revenue, 36% of which was contributed by the acquisition
of Perot Systems. Large Enterprise revenue decreased
significantly
year-over-year
across most countries.
|
During Fiscal 2010, operating income percentage decreased
70 basis points
year-over-year
to 5.7%. Operating income deteriorated as revenue decreased
year-over-year
due to lower demand. Additionally, operating expenses as a
percentage of revenue increased
year-over-year
even though operating expense dollars decreased 17%.
|
|
|
Public Public experienced a
year-over-year
decline in revenue during Fiscal 2010 due to the soft demand in
the global economy. During Fiscal 2010, Publics revenue
declined across all product categories except for services, and
software and peripherals revenue, which grew
year-over-year
by 28% and 5%, respectively. The growth in services revenue was
largely due to the acquisition of Perot Systems, which
contributed $418 million to Publics Fiscal 2010
services revenue. Without the contribution by Perot Systems,
Publics services revenue would have remained relatively
flat with the prior year. The product revenue decline was led by
lower revenue from sales of desktop PCs, which decreased
year-over-year
by 20%.
|
During Fiscal 2010, operating income percentage increased
120 basis points
year-over-year
to 9.4%. Operating income was positively impacted by a
year-over-year
improvement in gross margin percentage during Fiscal 2010 as we
continued to optimize our pricing and cost structure and sell
higher value solutions to our customers. The addition of Perot
Systems contributed 3% to the growth in operating income. Also
favorably impacting operating income was a 5%
year-over-year
decrease in operating expenses during Fiscal 2010, driven by
cost savings related to headcount reductions and improved
spending controls on SG&A and RD&E expenditures.
|
|
|
Small and Medium Business During
Fiscal 2010, SMB experienced a 19%
year-over-year
decline in revenue due to double digit revenue declines across
all product lines except storage and services. The revenue
declines were led by a 28% and 18% decline in desktop PC and
mobility revenue, respectively. We limited our
|
35
|
|
|
participation in certain lower priced but higher demand bands in
an effort to protect profitability. Storage and services had 9%
and 8%
year-over-year
decreases, respectively. Consistent with our other Commercial
segments performance, the contraction of the global
economy during the first half of Fiscal 2010 and competitive
pressures were significant contributors to SMBs
year-over-year
revenue declines. From a country perspective, SMB had
year-over-year
revenue declines in most countries except the BRIC countries, in
which the combined revenue grew 24%.
|
Operating income percentage increased 10 basis points
year-over-year
to 8.6% during Fiscal 2010. Operating income dollars decreased
18% as revenue and unit shipments decreased significantly for
both periods. Also impacting operating income was a slight
increase in gross margin percentage during Fiscal 2010. We were
also able to reduce operating expenses during Fiscal 2010,
mainly due to tighter spending controls on SG&A and
RD&E expenses.
|
|
|
Consumer During Fiscal 2010,
Consumers revenue declined 6%
year-over-year,
on unit growth of 19%. Even though unit shipments grew, our
Consumer revenue decreased mainly due to the effects of our
growth in retail, which tends to have lower average selling
prices, combined with a shift in product mix and competitive
pricing pressures. As a result, our average selling prices
declined 21%
year-over-year
during Fiscal 2010. From a product perspective, Consumers
desktop PC revenue declined 24% during Fiscal 2010 as compared
to Fiscal 2009 on a unit shipment decline of 10%. Mobility
revenue increased 4% during Fiscal 2010. During the same period,
mobility units shipped increased
year-over-year
by 32%; however, the positive impact of increased shipments was
offset by an average selling price per unit decline of 21%. The
continued shift in consumer preference from desktops to
notebooks has contributed to our mobility unit growth. The
reduction in mobility average selling prices was mainly
attributable to our expansion into retail coupled with a demand
shift from higher to lower priced notebooks and the growing
popularity of netbooks. Software and peripherals and services
revenue also declined 12% and 16%
year-over-year,
respectively, during Fiscal 2010. At a country level, our
targeted BRIC revenue grew 46% during Fiscal 2010.
|
Consumers operating income percentage declined
approximately 150 basis points
year-over-year
to 0.9%. Consumers operating performance was affected by a
year-over-year
decline in gross margin during Fiscal 2010 mainly due to the
previously mentioned revenue declines and to component cost
pressures. Even though operating expenses decreased
year-over-year,
operating expenses as a percentage of revenue remained
relatively flat during Fiscal 2010 as compared to Fiscal 2009.
During Fiscal 2010, Consumers revenue and operating income
was favorably impacted by a second quarter $53 million
transaction, in which a vendor purchased our contractual right
to share in future revenues from product renewals sold by the
vendor. Excluding this transaction, Consumers Fiscal 2010
operating income percentage would have been 0.4% instead of 0.9%.
Revenue
by Product and Services Categories
We design, develop, manufacture, market, sell, and support a
wide range of products that in many cases are customized to
individual customer requirements. Our products are organized
between enterprise and client categories. Our enterprise
products include servers and networking, and storage products.
Client products include mobility and desktop PC products. Our
services include a broad range of configurable IT and business
services, including infrastructure technology, consulting and
applications, and product-related support services. We also
offer software and peripheral products.
36
The following table summarizes our net revenue by product and
services categories for each of the past three fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2010
|
|
|
|
January 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Change
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Change
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise solutions and services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise solutions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servers and networking
|
|
$
|
7,609
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
26%
|
|
|
$
|
6,032
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
|
(7%
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,512
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
Storage
|
|
|
2,295
|
|
|
|
4%
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
2,192
|
|
|
|
4%
|
|
|
|
(18%
|
)
|
|
|
2,667
|
|
|
|
4%
|
|
Services
|
|
|
7,673
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
36%
|
|
|
|
5,622
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
5,351
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
Software and peripherals
|
|
|
10,261
|
|
|
|
17%
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
|
9,499
|
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
(10%
|
)
|
|
|
10,603
|
|
|
|
17%
|
|
Client:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobility
|
|
|
18,971
|
|
|
|
31%
|
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
|
16,610
|
|
|
|
31%
|
|
|
|
(11%
|
)
|
|
|
18,604
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
Desktop PCs
|
|
|
14,685
|
|
|
|
24%
|
|
|
|
13%
|
|
|
|
12,947
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
(25%
|
)
|
|
|
17,364
|
|
|
|
29%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
$
|
61,494
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
|
$
|
52,902
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
(13%
|
)
|
|
$
|
61,101
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2011 compared to Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
Enterprise Solutions and Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servers and Networking The increase in our
servers and networking revenue for Fiscal 2011 as compared to
the same periods of Fiscal 2010 was due to demand improvements
across all Commercial segments. During Fiscal 2011, unit
shipments increased 13%
year-over-year,
and average selling prices increased 12%, driven by improved
product mix toward our new product lines.
|
|
|
|
Storage Storage revenue increased 5% for
Fiscal 2011. The increase in Storage revenue was primarily
driven by our SMB segment with a 21% increase
year-over-year.
Dell EqualLogic continued to perform strongly, with
year-over-year
revenue growth of 62%. We believe we will generate higher
margins as we shift towards more Dell-branded storage offerings,
which generally can be sold with service solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services Services revenue increased
$2.1 billion from $5.6 billion during Fiscal 2010 to
$7.7 billion during Fiscal 2011, with revenue from Perot
Systems contributing a large proportion of the increase. As
Perot Systems was acquired on November 3, 2009, our
services results for Fiscal 2010 include contributions from
Perot Systems for one fiscal quarter. Perot Systems reported
revenue of $1.9 billion for the three quarters ended
September 30, 2009. Perot Systems results for the
three quarters ended September 30, 2009, are presented for
informational purposes only and are not indicative of the
results that actually would have occurred if the acquisition had
been completed at the beginning of Fiscal 2010, nor are they
indicative of future results. Combining the results of Perot
Systems revenue for the three quarters ended
September 30, 2009, with Dell Services revenue for the
Fiscal 2010, does not take into consideration intercompany
charges, synergies, or other effects of the integration of Perot
Systems.
|
The integration of Perot Systems primarily impacted our Public
and Large Enterprise segments. We continue to view services as a
strategic growth opportunity and will continue to invest in our
offerings and resources to focus on increasing our solutions
sales. With the ongoing integration of Perot Systems, we have
simplified the way we view our services business by grouping
offerings with similar demand, economic and delivery profiles
into three categories of services: transactional; outsourcing;
and project-based.
During Fiscal 2011, we experienced increases in our outsourcing
and project-based revenues, due to our acquisition of Perot
Systems, while transactional revenues remained relatively flat.
Our estimated services
37
backlog as of January 28, 2011 and January 29, 2010,
was $13.9 billion and $12.8 billion, respectively. We
provide information regarding services backlog because we
believe it provides useful trend information regarding changes
in the size of our services business over time. Services
backlog, as defined by us, includes deferred services revenue
and contracted services backlog. Deferred services revenue,
which consists primarily of our extended warranties, was
$6.7 billion and $6.1 billion as of January 28,
2011 and January 29, 2010, respectively. Estimated
contracted services backlog, which is primarily related to our
outsourcing services business, was $7.2 billion and
$6.7 billion, as of January 28, 2011 and
January 29, 2010, respectively. While there are no
third-party standards or requirements governing the calculation
of contracted services backlog, our estimated contracted
services backlog represents signed contracts initially exceeding
$2 million in total expected revenue and having an initial
contract term exceeding 18 months. The terms of the signed
services contracts included in our calculation of services
backlog are subject to change and are affected by terminations,
changes in the scope of services, and changes to other factors
that could impact the value of the contract. For these and other
reasons, it is not reasonably practicable to estimate the
portions for these backlog amounts that will ultimately be
recognized as revenue when performance on the contracts is
completed.
|
|
|
Software and Peripherals Revenue from
sales of software and peripherals (S&P) is
derived from sales of Dell-branded printers, monitors (not sold
with systems), projectors, keyboards, mice, docking stations,
and a multitude of third-party peripherals, including
televisions, cameras, stand-alone software sales and related
support services, and other products. The 8% increase in
S&P revenue for Fiscal 2011 was driven by overall customer
unit shipment increases due to sales of displays and electronics
and peripherals, which experienced a combined
year-over-year
revenue increase of 15% for Fiscal 2011, while revenue from
imaging products decreased by 6%.
|
Software revenue from our S&P line of business, which
includes stand alone sales of software license fees and related
post-contract customer support, is reported in services revenue,
including software related on our Consolidated Statements of
Income. Software and related support services revenue
represented 33% and 39% of services revenue, including software
related for Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
Mobility Revenue from mobility products
(which include notebook computers, mobile workstations, and
smartphones) increased 14% during Fiscal 2011 across all
operating segments due to demand improvements. Mobility units
increased 14%, while average selling prices remained flat during
Fiscal 2011. During Fiscal 2011, overall Commercial mobility
revenue increased 19%
year-over-year,
and revenue from Consumer mobility increased 8%. The increase in
Commercial mobility was driven by increases in demand for our
Latitude notebooks. We believe the on-going demand trend towards
mobility products will continue, and we plan to address this
demand by expanding our product platforms to cover broader
feature sets and price bands.
|
|
|
|
Desktop PCs During Fiscal 2011, revenue from
desktop PCs (which include desktop computer systems and fixed
workstations) increased as unit demand for desktop PCs increased
by 10%. The average selling price for our desktop computers
increased by 3%
year-over-year
due to a slight shift in product mix to higher priced units. The
increase in unit demand was driven by our Large Enterprise and
SMB customers, generating 25% and 23%, respectively, increases
in revenue
year-over-year
for Fiscal 2011. These increases were driven primarily by the
stronger demand for our Optiplex desktop PCs and fixed work
stations. In the consumer marketplace, we are continuing to see
rising end-user demand for mobility products, which moderates
the demand for desktop PCs.
|
Fiscal
2010 compared to Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
Enterprise Solutions and Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servers and Networking The decline in our
servers and networking revenue during Fiscal 2010 was due to
demand challenges across all Commercial segments and regions.
Unit shipments decreased 12%
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
year-over-year,
though average selling prices increased 6%
year-over-year,
driven by improved product mix toward our new product lines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage All Commercial segments contributed
to the
year-over-year
decrease in storage revenue during Fiscal 2010. Dell EqualLogic
performed strongly with
year-over-year
revenue growth of 45%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services Services revenue increased
year-over-year
during Fiscal 2010 with revenue from Perot Systems contributing
$588 million of the increase. Without the contribution by
Perot Systems, services revenue would have decreased 6%. A
significant portion of Dells services is made up of
support services, which tend to correlate with hardware unit
growth. Therefore, excluding the impact of Perot Systems, our
declines in unit shipments contributed to the
year-over-year
services revenue decline. Perot Systems primarily impacted our
Public and Large Enterprise segments, with $418 million and
$160 million in services revenue, respectively. Our
deferred services revenue balance increased 6.5%
year-over-year
to $6.1 billion at January 29, 2010.
|
|
|
|
Software and Peripherals The decline in
S&P revenue was driven by overall customer unit shipment
declines and demand softness in displays, imaging products, and
electronics, which experienced
year-over-year
revenue decreases of 27%,20%, and 9%, respectively, for Fiscal
2010 . We saw growth in software licensing, with revenue
improvement of 5% during Fiscal 2010. All segments experienced
year-over-year
revenue declines during Fiscal 2010, except for Public, which
experienced
year-over-year
S&P revenue growth of 5%.
|
|
|
Client
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobility Revenue from mobility products
declined during Fiscal 2010 even though unit shipments increased
7% over Fiscal 2009 due to an industry mix shift to lower priced
mobility product offerings. The unit increase was primarily
driven by a 32%
year-over-year
increase in Consumer units, while Commercial units declined 12%
for the same period. Overall, Consumer mobility revenue
increased 4%
year-over-year,
while Commercial declined 20%.
|
|
|
|
Desktop PCs During Fiscal 2010, revenue from
desktop PCs decreased on unit declines of 17%. In the
marketplace, we saw rising end-user demand for mobility
products, which contributed to further slowing demand for
desktop PCs. The decline in desktop PC revenue was also due to
the on-going competitive pricing pressure for lower priced
desktops and the slowdown in global IT end-user demand during
Fiscal 2010. Consequently, our average selling price for
desktops decreased 11%
year-over-year
as we aligned our prices and product offerings with the
marketplace. During Fiscal 2010, desktop revenue decreased
across all segments.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
We use our 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan, amended in
December 2007, for stock-based incentive awards. These
awards can be in the form of stock options, stock appreciation
rights, stock bonuses, restricted stock, restricted stock units,
performance units, or performance shares. Stock-based
compensation expense totaled $332 million for Fiscal 2011,
compared to $312 million and $418 million for Fiscal
2010 and Fiscal 2009, respectively. Stock-based compensation
expense for Fiscal 2009 included $104 million of expense
for accelerated options. For further discussion on stock-based
compensation, see Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements included in Part II
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.
39
Interest
and Other, net
The following table provides a detailed presentation of interest
and other, net for Fiscal 2011, 2010, and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Interest and other, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income, primarily interest
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
Gains (losses) on investments, net
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
115
|
|
Other
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other, net
|
|
$
|
(83
|
)
|
|
$
|
(148
|
)
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2011 compared to Fiscal 2010
We continued to maintain a portfolio of instruments with shorter
maturities, which typically carry lower market yields. During
Fiscal 2011, our investment income declined slightly, even with
higher average balances, primarily due to a continued declined
in market yields. Overall investment yield in Fiscal 2011
declined from approximately 48 basis points during Fiscal 2010
to approximately 35 basis points.
The
year-over-year
increase in interest expense for Fiscal 2011 was due to higher
debt levels, which increased to $6.0 billion as of
January 28, 2011, from $4.1 billion as of
January 29, 2010.
The
year-over-year
change in foreign exchange for Fiscal 2011 was primarily due to
gains from revaluation of certain un-hedged foreign currency
balances, partially offset by increases in the costs associated
with the hedge program.
Other includes a $72 million merger termination fee
received during Fiscal 2011.
Fiscal
2010 compared to Fiscal 2009
During Fiscal 2010, our investment income declined, even with
higher average balances, primarily due to a decrease in market
yields. Increased long-term and short-term debt during Fiscal
2010 resulted in increased interest expense.
Other, in the table above, primarily reflects the fair market
value adjustments related to our deferred compensation plan
investments. We recognized a $24 million increase and a
$35 million decline in the fair market values of our
deferred compensation plan investments during Fiscal 2010 and
Fiscal 2009, respectively.
The
year-over-year
decrease in foreign exchange for Fiscal 2010, as compared to
Fiscal 2009, was primarily due to increased costs on our hedge
program, as well as revaluation on balances in un-hedged
currencies, as most foreign currencies strengthened relative to
the U.S. Dollar during Fiscal 2010. In addition, for Fiscal
2009, a $42 million gain resulted from the correction of
errors in the remeasurement of certain local currency balances
to the functional currency in prior periods.
Income
and Other Taxes
Our effective tax rate was 21.3%, 29.2%, and 25.4% for Fiscal
2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. The decrease in our
effective income tax rate for Fiscal 2011 as compared to Fiscal
2010, was primarily due to an increase in the proportion of
taxable income attributable to lower tax jurisdictions during
Fiscal 2011. The differences between our effective tax rate and
the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% principally resulted from
our geographical distribution of taxable income and permanent
differences between the book and tax treatment of certain items.
The increase in our effective income tax rate for Fiscal 2010
from Fiscal 2009 was primarily due to an increased mix of
profits in
40
higher tax rate jurisdictions. Our foreign earnings are
generally taxed at lower rates than in the United States. We
continue to assess our business model and its impact in various
tax jurisdictions.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated tax impact
of temporary differences between the tax and book basis of
assets and liabilities are recognized based on the enacted
statutory tax rates for the year in which we expect the
differences to reverse. A valuation allowance is established
against a deferred tax asset when it is more likely than not
that the asset or any portion thereof will not be realized.
Based upon all the available evidence, including expectation of
future taxable income, we have determined that we will be able
to realize all of our deferred tax assets, net of valuation
allowances.
We are currently under income tax audits in various
jurisdictions, including the United States. As a result of these
audits, we maintain ongoing discussions and negotiations
relating to tax matters with the taxing authorities in these
various jurisdictions. The Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) issued a Revenue Agents Report for
fiscal years 2004 through 2006 proposing certain assessments
primarily related to transfer pricing matters. We disagree with
certain of the proposed assessments and have contested them
through the IRS administrative appeals procedures. The IRS has
recently remanded the audit for fiscal years 2004 through 2006
back to examination for further review. We continue to believe
that adequate reserves have been provided relating to all
matters contained in tax periods open to examination. However,
should we experience an unfavorable outcome in the matter before
the IRS Appeals Division, such an outcome could have a material
impact on our financial statements.
We take certain non-income tax positions in the jurisdictions in
which we operate and have received certain non-income tax
assessments from some of these jurisdictions. These
jurisdictions include Brazil, where we have been in litigation
with a state government over the proper application of
transactional taxes to warranties and software related to the
sale of computers, as well as over the appropriate use of state
statutory incentives to reduce the transactional taxes. We have
also negotiated certain tax incentives with the state that can
be used to offset potential tax liabilities should the courts
rule against us. Recently, we settled two cases related to
warranties and software under a taxpayer amnesty program
utilizing the incentive credits instead of cash to minimize the
impact to our consolidated financial statements. The third
outstanding case, which is on appeal and for which we have
pledged our manufacturing facility in Hortolandia, Brazil to the
government, remains pending. We do not expect the outcome of
this case to have a material impact to our financial statements.
In the normal course of business, our positions and conclusions
related to our non-income taxes could be challenged and
assessments may be made. To the extent new information is
obtained and our views on our positions, probable outcomes of
assessments, or litigation change, changes in estimates to our
accrued liabilities would be recorded in the period in which the
determination is made.
For a further discussion of the impact of uncertain tax
positions, see Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Part II
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.
ACCOUNTS
RECEIVABLE
We sell products and services directly to customers and through
a variety of sales channels, including retail distribution. At
January 28, 2011, our accounts receivable, net was
$6.5 billion, a 11% increase from our balance at
January 29, 2010. This increase in accounts receivable was
primarily due to growth in our Commercial business, which
typically has longer payment terms, and an increase in fourth
quarter revenue as compared to Fiscal 2010. We maintain an
allowance for doubtful accounts to cover receivables that may be
deemed uncollectible. The allowance for losses is based on
specific identifiable customer accounts that are deemed at risk
and a general provision based on historical bad debt experience.
As of January 28, 2011 and January 29, 2010, the
allowance for doubtful accounts was $96 million and
$115 million, respectively. Based on our assessment, we
believe we are adequately reserved for expected credit losses.
We monitor the aging of our accounts receivable and continue to
take actions to reduce our exposure to credit losses.
DELL
FINANCIAL SERVICES AND FINANCING RECEIVABLES
DFS offers a wide range of financial services in the U.S.,
including originating, collecting, and servicing customer
receivables related to the purchase of Dell products. To support
the financing needs of our customers internationally,
41
we have aligned with a select number of third party financial
services companies. We are exploring the possibility of
expanding DFS operations into select international markets.
The results of DFS are included in the business segment where
the customer receivable was originated. DFS has contributed to
the growth in profitability for all of our business segments in
recent periods.
At January 28, 2011 and January 29, 2010, our net
financing receivables balances were $4.4 billion and
$3.0 billion, respectively. The increase was primarily the
result of the consolidation of two previously nonconsolidated
qualifying special purpose entities (SPEs) and a
purchase of revolving customer receivables from CIT Group Inc.
(CIT) as discussed below. To manage the expected
growth in financing receivables, we will continue to balance the
use of our own working capital and other sources of liquidity,
including securitization programs. Beginning in the first
quarter of Fiscal 2011, CIT, formerly a joint venture partner of
Dell Financial Services L.L.C. (DFS), our
wholly-owned subsidiary, is no longer funding DFS financing
receivables.
During Fiscal 2011, we continued to transfer certain customer
financing receivables to SPEs in securitization transactions.
The purpose of the SPEs is to facilitate the funding of customer
receivables through financing arrangements with multi-seller
conduits that issue asset-backed debt securities in the capital
markets. We transferred $1.9 billion, $0.8 billion,
and $1.4 billion to these SPEs during Fiscal 2011, Fiscal
2010, and Fiscal 2009, respectively. Our risk of loss related to
these securitized receivables is limited to the amount of our
over-collateralization in the transferred pool of receivables.
We have a securitization program to fund revolving loans through
a consolidated SPE, which we account for as a secured borrowing.
Additionally, as of January 29, 2010, the two SPEs that
funded fixed-term leases and loans were not consolidated. As of
the beginning of the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, we adopted
the new accounting guidance that requires us to apply variable
interest entity accounting to these special purpose entities and
therefore consolidated the two remaining nonconsolidated SPEs.
The impact of the adoption resulted in a $1 million
decrease to beginning retained earnings for Fiscal 2011 and did
not impact our results of operations or our cash flows. Starting
in the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, we account for these
fixed-term securitization programs as secured borrowings. At
January 28, 2011 and January 29, 2010, the structured
financing debt related to all of our secured borrowing
securitization programs was $1.0 billion and
$164 million, respectively, and the carrying amount of the
corresponding financing receivables was $1.3 billion and
$0.3 billion, respectively.
During Fiscal 2011, we purchased a portfolio of revolving
receivables from CIT that consisted of revolving Dell customer
account balances. These receivables, which are considered credit
impaired loans, were purchased for $430 million and had a
principal and accrued interest balance of $570 million at
the date of purchase. All of the receivables have been serviced
by DFS since their inception. In connection with the
acquisition, we ended our servicing relationship with CIT for
these assets. See the Restricted Cash discussion for
additional information on the termination of our agreement with
CIT. We believe the overall economics generated by these assets
will be accretive to our results and will provide an acceptable
return on capital.
We maintain an allowance to cover expected financing receivable
credit losses and evaluate credit loss expectations based on our
total portfolio. For Fiscal 2011, Fiscal 2010, and Fiscal 2009,
the principal charge-off rate for our total portfolio, excluding
the effect of the receivables purchased from CIT during Fiscal
2011, was 6.6%, 8.0%, and 7.0%, respectively. If the receivables
purchased from CIT had been included in our portfolio for all of
Fiscal 2011, the rate would have been 7.5%. Principal
charge-offs for the purchased receivables do not impact our
allowance for losses as they were contemplated in the purchase
price and are reflected in the yield recognized as interest
income. The allowance for losses is determined based on various
factors, including historical and anticipated experience, past
due receivables, receivable type, and customer risk profile. At
January 28, 2011 and January 29, 2010, the allowance
for financing receivable losses was $241 million and
$237 million, respectively. In general, we are seeing
improving loss rates associated with our financing receivables
as the economy has stabilized. We have an extensive process to
manage our exposure to customer risk, including active
management of credit lines and our collection activities. The
credit quality mix of our financing receivables has improved in
recent years due to our underwriting actions and as the mix of
high quality commercial accounts in our portfolio has increased.
Based on our assessment of the customer financing receivables,
we believe that we are adequately reserved.
The Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure
Act of 2009 was signed into U.S. law on May 22, 2009, and
has affected the consumer financing provided by DFS. Commercial
credit is unaffected by the changes in law. All provisions of
the law are now in effect. This Act imposed new restrictions on
credit card companies in the
42
areas of marketing, servicing, and pricing of consumer credit
accounts. The changes have not substantially altered how
consumer credit is offered to our customers or how their
accounts are serviced. We do not believe that the impact of
these changes is material to our financial results.
See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
included in Part II
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data for additional information about our financing
receivables and the associated allowance.
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
With the consolidation of our previously nonconsolidated special
purpose entities, we no longer have off-balance sheet financing
arrangements.
MARKET
RISK
We are exposed to a variety of risks, including foreign currency
exchange rate fluctuations and changes in the market value of
our investments. In the normal course of business, we employ
established policies and procedures to manage these risks.
Foreign
Currency Hedging Activities
During Fiscal 2011, the principal foreign currencies in which we
transacted business were the Euro, Chinese Renminbi, British
Pound, Japanese Yen, Canadian Dollar, and Australian Dollar. Our
objective in managing our exposures to foreign currency exchange
rate fluctuations is to reduce the impact of adverse
fluctuations associated with foreign currency exchange rate
changes on our earnings and cash flows. Accordingly, we utilize
foreign currency option contracts and forward contracts to hedge
our exposure on forecasted transactions and firm commitments for
certain currencies. During Fiscal 2011, we hedged our exposures
on more than 20 currencies. We monitor our foreign currency
exchange exposures to ensure the overall effectiveness of our
foreign currency hedge positions. However, there can be no
assurance that our foreign currency hedging activities will
continue to substantially offset the impact of fluctuations in
currency exchange rates on our results of operations and
financial position in the future.
Based on our foreign currency cash flow hedge instruments
outstanding at January 28, 2011 and January 29, 2010,
we estimate a maximum potential
one-day loss
in fair value of approximately $65 million and
$86 million, respectively, using a
Value-at-Risk
(VAR) model. By using market implied rates and
incorporating volatility and correlation among the currencies of
a portfolio, the VAR model simulates 3,000 randomly generated
market prices and calculates the difference between the fifth
percentile and the average as the
Value-at-Risk.
The VAR model is a risk estimation tool and is not intended to
represent actual losses in fair value that will be incurred.
Additionally, as we utilize foreign currency instruments for
hedging forecasted and firmly committed transactions, a loss in
fair value for those instruments is generally offset by
increases in the value of the underlying exposure.
Cash and
Investments
At January 28, 2011, we had $15.1 billion of total
cash, cash equivalents, and investments. The objective of our
investment policy and strategy is to manage our total cash and
investments balances to preserve principal and maintain
liquidity while maximizing the return on the investment
portfolio through the full investment of available funds. We
diversify our investment portfolio by investing in multiple
types of investment-grade securities and through the use of
third-party investment managers.
43
The following table summarizes our ending cash, cash
equivalents, and investments balances for the respective periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Cash, cash equivalents, and investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
13,913
|
|
|
$
|
10,635
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
Equity and other securities
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents, and investments
|
|
$
|
15,069
|
|
|
$
|
11,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the $15.1 billion of cash, cash equivalents, and
investments, $13.9 billion is classified as cash and cash
equivalents. Our cash equivalents primarily consist of money
market funds and commercial paper. Due to the nature of these
investments, we consider it reasonable to expect that they will
not be significantly impacted by a change in interest rates, and
that these investments can be liquidated for cash at short
notice. Our cash equivalents are recorded at fair value.
The remaining $1.2 billion of cash, cash equivalents, and
investments is primarily invested in fixed income securities,
including government, agency and corporate debt securities of
varying maturities at the date of acquisition. The fair value of
our portfolio is affected primarily by interest rates more than
by credit and liquidity risks. We attempt to mitigate these
risks by investing primarily in high credit quality securities,
limiting the amount that can be invested in any single issuer,
and investing in short -to intermediate-term investments whose
market value is less sensitive to interest rate changes. Based
on our investment portfolio and interest rates at
January 28, 2011, a 100 basis point increase or decrease in
interest rates would result in a decrease or increase of
approximately $4 million in the fair value of the
investment portfolio.
We periodically review our investment portfolio to determine if
any investment is
other-than-temporarily
impaired due to changes in credit risk or other potential
valuation concerns. At January 28, 2011, our portfolio
included securities with unrealized losses totaling
$1 million, which have been recorded in other comprehensive
income (loss), as we believe the investments are not
other-than-temporarily
impaired. While these
available-for-sale
securities have market values below cost, we believe it is
probable that the principal and interest will be collected in
accordance with the contractual terms, and that the decline in
the market value is primarily due to changes in interest rates
and not increased credit risk.
The fair value of our portfolio is based on prices provided from
national pricing services, which we currently believe are
indicative of fair value, as our assessment is that the inputs
are market observable. We will continue to evaluate whether the
inputs are market observable in accordance with the accounting
guidance on fair value measurements. We conduct reviews
on a quarterly basis to verify pricing, assess liquidity, and
determine if significant inputs have changed that would impact
our fair value disclosures.
LIQUIDITY,
CAPITAL COMMITMENTS, AND CONTRACTUAL CASH OBLIGATIONS
Current
Market Conditions
We regularly monitor economic conditions and associated impacts
on the financial markets and our business. Though there was
improvement in the global economic environment during Fiscal
2011, we continue to be cautious given the volatility associated
with currency markets, international sovereign economies, and
other economic indicators. We continue to evaluate the financial
health of our supplier base, carefully manage customer credit,
diversify counterparty risk, and monitor the concentration risk
of our cash and cash equivalents balances globally.
We monitor credit risk associated with our financial
counterparties using various market credit risk indicators such
as credit ratings issued by nationally recognized rating
agencies and changes in market credit default swap levels. We
perform periodic evaluations of our positions with these
counterparties and may limit exposure to any one
44
counterparty in accordance with our policies. We monitor and
manage these activities depending on current and expected market
developments.
See Part I Item 1A Risk
Factors for further discussion of risks associated with
our use of counterparties. The impact on our Consolidated
Financial Statements of any credit adjustments related to these
counterparties has been immaterial.
Liquidity
Cash generated from operations is our primary source of
operating liquidity and we believe that internally generated
cash flows are sufficient to support
day-to-day
business operations. Our working capital management team
actively monitors the efficiency of our balance sheet under
various macroeconomic and competitive scenarios. These scenarios
quantify risks to the financial statements and provide a basis
for actions necessary to ensure adequate liquidity, both
domestically and internationally, to support our acquisition and
investment strategy, share repurchase activity and other
corporate needs. We utilize external capital sources, such as
long-term notes and structured financing arrangements, and
short-term borrowings, consisting primarily of commercial paper,
to supplement our internally generated sources of liquidity as
necessary. We have a currently effective shelf registration
statement filed with the SEC for the issuance of debt
securities. The current shelf registration will terminate during
the first quarter of Fiscal 2012 and we intend to replace the
shelf registration prior to its termination to allow us to
continue to issue debt securities. We anticipate we will enter
the debt capital markets in the near term; however, it will
depend on the favorability of market conditions. We intend to
maintain appropriate debt levels based upon cash flow
expectations, the overall cost of capital, cash requirements for
operations, and discretionary spending, including for
acquisitions and share repurchases. Due to the overall strength
of our financial position, we believe that we will have adequate
access to capital markets. Any future disruptions, uncertainty
or volatility in those markets may result in higher funding
costs for us and adversely affect our ability to obtain funds.
Our cash balances are held in numerous locations throughout the
world, most of which are outside of the U.S. While our U.S. cash
balances do fluctuate, we typically operate with
10-20% of
our cash balances held domestically. Demand on our domestic cash
has increased as a result of our strategic initiatives. We fund
these initiatives through a balance of internally generated
cash, external sources of capital, which includes our
$2 billion commercial paper program, and, when
advantageous, access to foreign cash in a tax efficient manner.
Where local regulations limit an efficient intercompany transfer
of amounts held outside of the U.S., we will continue to utilize
these funds for local liquidity needs. Under current law,
balances available to be repatriated to the U.S. would be
subject to U.S. federal income taxes, less applicable foreign
tax credits. We have provided for the U.S. federal tax liability
on these amounts for financial statement purposes, except for
foreign earnings that are considered permanently reinvested
outside of the U.S. We utilize a variety of tax planning and
financing strategies with the objective of having our worldwide
cash available in the locations where it is needed. Our
non-U.S.
domiciled cash and investments are generally denominated in the
U.S. Dollar.
The following table contains a summary of our Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the past three fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Net change in cash from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
3,969
|
|
|
$
|
3,906
|
|
|
$
|
1,894
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(1,165
|
)
|
|
|
(3,809
|
)
|
|
|
177
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
2,012
|
|
|
|
(1,406
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3,278
|
|
|
$
|
2,283
|
|
|
$
|
588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
Operating Activities Operating cash
flows for Fiscal 2011 increased slightly compared to the prior
fiscal year. Fiscal 2011 net income and deferred revenue
increased
year-over-year,
but were offset by less favorable changes in working capital.
For Fiscal 2010 compared to Fiscal 2009, the increase in
operating cash flows was primarily attributable to the
improvement of our cash conversion cycle, as a result of
operational improvements related to our vendor programs, the
effects of which were partially offset by the decrease in net
income and growth in financing receivables. Our negative cash
conversion cycle combined with revenue growth typically results
in operating cash generation in excess of net income. See
Key Performance Metrics below for additional
discussion of our cash conversion cycle.
Investing Activities Investing
activities consist of the net of maturities and sales and
purchases of investments; net capital expenditures for property,
plant, and equipment; principal cash flows related to purchased
financing receivables; and net cash used to fund strategic
acquisitions. Cash used in investing activities during Fiscal
2011 was $1.2 billion compared to cash used of
$3.8 billion and cash provided of $177 million during
Fiscal 2010 and Fiscal 2009, respectively. The
year-over-year
decrease in cash used in investing activities for Fiscal 2011
was mainly due to lower acquisition spending, partially offset
by a $430 million purchase of financing receivables from
CIT. The purchase of these financing receivables has allowed us
to substantially end our servicing relationship with CIT related
to the previous joint venture in the U.S. Additionally, we
believe that the return on capital generated by these assets
will be equal to or higher than that achieved by other financing
activities. Cash used to fund strategic acquisitions, net of
cash acquired, was approximately $376 million during Fiscal
2011 compared to $3.6 billion and $176 million during
Fiscal 2010 and Fiscal 2009, respectively. Our Fiscal 2011
acquisitions consisted of Kace Networks, Inc., Ocarina Networks
Inc., Scalent Systems, Inc., Boomi, Inc., and InSite One, Inc..
Our principal acquisition in Fiscal 2010 was Perot Systems.
Financing Activities Financing
activities primarily consist of proceeds and repayments from
borrowings and the repurchase of our common stock. The
year-over-year
decrease in cash provided by financing activities for Fiscal
2011 was mainly due to the repurchase of our common stock and
repayment of commercial paper. We repurchased 57 million
shares of common stock for $800 million during Fiscal 2011.
The amount of shares we purchased during Fiscal 2010 was
immaterial to financing activities compared to approximately
134 million shares repurchased at an aggregate cost of
$2.9 billion during Fiscal 2009. During Fiscal 2011, net
cash used for repayment of commercial paper with maturities of
both greater than and less than 90 days was
$496 million, which was partially offset by
$305 million in net proceeds from structured financing
programs. We had net proceeds of $396 million and
$100 million from commercial paper sales during Fiscal 2010
and Fiscal 2009, respectively. During both Fiscal 2011 and
Fiscal 2010, we had net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
of $1.5 billion. We had $4.8 billion principal amount
of long-term notes outstanding as of January 28, 2011
compared to $3.3 billion and $1.8 billion at
January 29, 2010 and January 30, 2009, respectively.
During Fiscal 2011, we entered into a new agreement to expand
our commercial paper program to $2 billion. We have
$2 billion of senior unsecured revolving credit facilities
supporting the commercial paper program. Our $2 billion of
credit facilities consist of two agreements, with
$1 billion expiring on June 1, 2011, and the remaining
$1 billion expiring on April 2, 2013. We intend to
enter into a new senior unsecured revolving credit facility for
a minimum of $1 billion prior to the expiration of the
current facility in Fiscal 2012.
During Fiscal 2011, we issued commercial paper with original
maturities of less than 90 days. As of January 28,
2011, we did not have any amounts outstanding under the
commercial paper program compared to $496 million as of
January 29, 2010, and $100 million as of
January 30, 2009.
We issued structured financing-related debt to fund our
financing receivables as previously discussed in the
Financing Receivables section above. The total debt
capacity of our securitization programs is $1.4 billion,
and we had $1.0 billion in outstanding structured financing
securitization debt as of January 28, 2011. During Fiscal
2011, we renewed one of our fixed-term securitization programs
and increased the debt capacity by $100 million. We
replaced the other fixed-term securitization program with no
change in debt capacity. In addition, we expanded our existing
revolving loan securitization program with a new program that
increased debt capacity levels by $150 million.
See Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements under Part II
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data for further discussion of our debt.
46
Key Performance Metrics Our cash
conversion cycle for the fiscal quarter ended January 28,
2011 deteriorated from the fiscal quarter ended January 29,
2010 and improved from the fiscal quarter ended January 30,
2009. Our business model allows us to maintain an efficient cash
conversion cycle, which compares favorably with that of others
in our industry.
The following table presents the components of our cash
conversion cycle for the fourth quarter of each of the past
three fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Days of sales
outstanding(a)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Days of supply in
inventory(b)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Days in accounts
payable(c)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash conversion cycle
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Days of sales outstanding
(DSO) calculates the average collection period of
our receivables. DSO is based on the ending net trade
receivables and the most recent quarterly revenue for each
period. DSO also includes the effect of product costs related to
customer shipments not yet recognized as revenue that are
classified in other current assets. DSO is calculated by adding
accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, and
customer shipments in transit and dividing that sum by average
net revenue per day for the current quarter (90 days). At
January 28, 2011, January 29, 2010 and
January 30, 2009, DSO and days of customer shipments not
yet recognized were 37 and 3 days, 35 and 3 days, and
31 and 4 days, respectively.
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Days of supply in inventory
(DSI) measures the average number of days from
procurement to sale of our product. DSI is based on ending
inventory and most recent quarterly cost of sales for each
period. DSI is calculated by dividing inventory by average cost
of goods sold per day for the current quarter (90 days).
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
Days in accounts payable
(DPO) calculates the average number of days our
payables remain outstanding before payment. DPO is based on
ending accounts payable and most recent quarterly cost of sales
for each period. DPO is calculated by dividing accounts payable
by average cost of goods sold per day for the current quarter
(90 days).
|
Our cash conversion cycle decreased three days at
January 28, 2011, from January 29, 2010, driven by a
two day increase in DSO and a one day increase in DSI. DPO was
flat
year-over-year.
The increase in DSO from January 29, 2010, was due to
growth in our commercial business, which typically has longer
payment terms. The slight increase in DSI from January 29,
2010, was primarily attributable to the optimization of our
supply chain requiring an increase in strategic purchases of
materials and finished goods inventory.
Our cash conversion cycle improved by 11 days at
January 29, 2010, from January 30, 2009, driven by a
15 day improvement in DPO, the effect of which was
partially offset by a three day increase in DSO and one day
increase in DSI. The improvement in DPO from January 30,
2009, was attributable to our ongoing transition to contract
manufacturing, further standardization of vendor agreements, and
the timing of supplier purchases and payments during Fiscal 2010
as compared to Fiscal 2009. The increase in DSO from
January 30, 2009, was primarily attributable to our growth
in consumer retail, whose customers typically have longer
payment terms, and to foreign currency movements due to the
slight weakening of the U.S. Dollar, the effects of which were
partially offset by a reduction in past-due receivables. The
deterioration in DSI from January 30, 2009, was primarily
attributable to an increase in finished goods inventory and
strategic materials purchases.
We defer the cost of revenue associated with customer shipments
not yet recognized as revenue until these shipments are
delivered. These deferred costs are included in our reported DSO
because we believe this reporting results in a more accurate
presentation of our DSO and cash conversion cycle. These
deferred costs are recorded in other current assets in our
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position and totaled
$541 million, $523 million, and $556 million, at
January 28, 2011, January 29, 2010, and
January 30, 2009, respectively.
We believe that we can generate cash flow from operations in
excess of net income over the long term and can operate our cash
conversion cycle at mid negative 30 days or better.
47
Capital
Commitments
Share Repurchase Program We have a
share repurchase program that authorizes us to purchase shares
of our common stock through a systematic program of open market
purchases in order to increase shareholder value and manage
dilution resulting from shares issued under our equity
compensation plans. However, we do not currently have a policy
that requires the repurchase of common stock to offset
share-based compensation arrangements. For more information
regarding share repurchases, see Part II
Item 5 Market for Registrants Common
Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities.
Capital Expenditures During Fiscal
2011 and Fiscal 2010, we spent $444 million and
$367 million, respectively, on property, plant, and
equipment primarily in connection with our global expansion
efforts and infrastructure investments made to support future
growth. Product demand, product mix, and the increased use of
contract manufacturers, as well as ongoing investments in
operating and information technology infrastructure, influence
the level and prioritization of our capital expenditures.
Aggregate capital expenditures for Fiscal 2012, which will be
primarily related to infrastructure investments and strategic
initiatives, are currently expected to total approximately
$700 million to $750 million. These expenditures will
be primarily funded from our cash flows from operating
activities.
Restricted Cash As of January 28,
2011 and January 29, 2010, we had restricted cash in the
amounts of $25 million and $147 million, respectively.
The balance at January 29, 2010 was primarily related to an
agreement between DFS and CIT which required us to maintain an
escrow cash account that was held as recourse reserves for
credit losses, performance fee deposits related to our private
label credit card, as well as amounts maintained in escrow
accounts related to our recent acquisitions. During Fiscal 2011,
the agreement between DFS and CIT was terminated and the
restricted cash that was held on deposit was returned to CIT.
The balance at January 28, 2011 was primarily related to
various escrow accounts in connection with our acquisitions.
Contractual
Cash Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual cash obligations
at January 28, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
2012
|
|
2013-2014
|
|
2015-2016
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Contractual cash obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on long term debt
|
|
$
|
5,050
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,750
|
|
|
$
|
1,200
|
|
|
$
|
2,100
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
2,356
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
Current portion of uncertain tax
positions(a)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual cash obligations
|
|
$
|
8,146
|
|
|
$
|
619
|
|
|
$
|
2,347
|
|
|
$
|
1,570
|
|
|
$
|
3,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
We had approximately
$2.3 billion in additional liabilities associated with
uncertain tax positions that are not expected to be liquidated
in Fiscal 2012. We are unable to reliably estimate the expected
payment dates for these additional non-current liabilities.
|
Principal Payments on Long Term Debt
Our expected principal cash payments related to long term debt
are exclusive of hedge accounting adjustments or discounts and
premiums. We have outstanding long-term unsecured notes with
varying maturities. For additional information, see Note 5
of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under
Part II Item 8 Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
Operating Leases We lease property and
equipment, manufacturing facilities, and office space under
non-cancellable leases. Certain of these leases obligate us to
pay taxes, maintenance, and repair costs.
Purchase Obligations Purchase
obligations are defined as contractual obligations to purchase
goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding on
us. These obligations specify all significant terms, including
fixed or
48
minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum, or variable
price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction.
Purchase obligations do not include contracts that may be
canceled without penalty.
We utilize several suppliers to manufacture
sub-assemblies
for our products. Our efficient supply chain management allows
us to enter into flexible and mutually beneficial purchase
arrangements with our suppliers in order to minimize inventory
risk. Consistent with industry practice, we acquire raw
materials or other goods and services, including product
components, by issuing to suppliers authorizations to purchase
based on our projected demand and manufacturing needs. These
purchase orders are typically fulfilled within 30 days and
are entered into during the ordinary course of business in order
to establish best pricing and continuity of supply for our
production. Purchase orders are not included in the table above
as they typically represent our authorization to purchase rather
than binding purchase obligations.
Purchase obligations decreased approximately $18 million
from January 29, 2010, to $365 million at
January 28, 2011. The decrease was primarily due to the
fulfillment of commitments to purchase key components and
services, partially offset by the renewal of or entry into new
purchase contracts.
Interest See Note 5 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Part II Item 8 Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data for further discussion
of our debt and related interest expense.
49
Risk
Factors Affecting Our Business and Prospects
There are numerous significant risks that affect our business,
operating results, financial condition, and prospects. Many of
these risks are beyond our control. These risks include those
relating to:
|
|
|
intense competition;
|
|
our cost efficiency measures;
|
|
our ability to manage effectively the change involved in
implementing our strategic initiatives;
|
|
our ability to manage solutions, product, and services
transitions in an effective manner;
|
|
adverse global economic conditions and instability in financial
markets;
|
|
our ability to generate substantial
non-U.S. net
revenue;
|
|
weak economic conditions and additional regulation affecting our
financial services activities;
|
|
our ability to achieve favorable pricing from our vendors;
|
|
our ability to deliver quality products and services;
|
|
our reliance on vendors for products and components, including
reliance on several single-sourced or limited-source suppliers;
|
|
successful implementation of our acquisition strategy;
|
|
our product, customer, and geographic sales mix, or seasonal
sales trends;
|
|
access to the capital markets by us and some of our customers;
|
|
loss of government contracts;
|
|
temporary suspension or debarment from contracting with U.S.
federal, state, and local governments as a result of our
settlement of the SEC investigation;
|
|
customer terminations, of or pricing changes in, services
contracts, or our failure to perform as we anticipate at the
time we enter into services contracts;
|
|
our ability to develop, obtain or protect licenses to
intellectual property developed by us or by others on
commercially reasonable and competitive terms;
|
|
information technology and manufacturing infrastructure
disruptions or breaches of data security;
|
|
our ability to hedge effectively our exposure to fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates;
|
|
counterparty default;
|
|
unfavorable results of legal proceedings;
|
|
expiration of tax holidays or favorable tax rate structures, or
unfavorable outcomes in tax audits and other tax compliance
matters;
|
|
our ability to attract, retain, and motivate key personnel;
|
|
our ability to maintain strong internal controls;
|
|
our compliance with current and changing environmental and
safety laws; and
|
|
the effect of armed hostilities, terrorism, natural disasters,
and public health issues.
|
For a discussion of these risk factors affecting our business,
operating results, financial conditions, and prospects, see
Part I Item 1A Risk
Factors.
50
Critical
Accounting Policies
We prepare our financial statements in conformity with GAAP. The
preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP
requires certain estimates, assumptions, and judgments to be
made that may affect our Consolidated Statements of Financial
Position and Consolidated Statement of Income. We believe our
most critical accounting policies relate to revenue recognition,
business combinations, warranty liabilities, income taxes, and
loss contingencies. We have discussed the development,
selection, and disclosure of our critical accounting policies
with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. These
critical accounting policies and our other accounting policies
are also described in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements included in Part II
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.
Revenue Recognition and Related Allowances We
enter into contracts to sell our products, software and services
and frequently enter into sales arrangements with customers that
contain multiple elements or deliverables such as hardware,
software, peripherals, and services. We use general revenue
recognition accounting guidance for hardware, software bundled
with hardware that is essential to the functionality of the
hardware, peripherals, and certain services. We recognize
revenue for these products when it is realized or realizable and
earned. Revenue is considered realized and earned when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has
occurred or services have been rendered; Dells fee to its
customer is fixed and determinable; and collection of the
resulting receivable is reasonably assured. We recognize revenue
in accordance with industry specific software accounting
guidance for all software that is not essential to the
functionality to the hardware. Judgments and estimates are
necessary to ensure compliance with GAAP. These judgments
include the allocation of the proceeds received from an
arrangement to the multiple elements, and the appropriate timing
of revenue recognition. Most of our products and services
qualify as separate units of accounting. We allocate revenue to
all deliverables based on their relative selling prices. GAAP
requires a hierarchy to be used to determine the selling price
for allocating revenue to deliverables; (1) vendor-specific
objective evidence (VSOE); (ii) third-party
evidence of selling price (TPE); and (iii) best
estimate of the selling price (ESP). A majority of
our product and service offerings are sold on a standalone
basis. Because selling price is generally available based on
standalone sales, we have limited application of TPE, as
determined by comparison of pricing for products and services to
the pricing of similar products and services as offered by Dell
or its competitors in standalone sales to similarly situated
customers.
We offer extended warranty and service contracts to customers
that extend
and/or
enhance the technical support, parts, and labor coverage offered
as part of the base warranty included with the product. Revenue
from extended warranty and service contracts, for which we are
obligated to perform, is recorded as deferred revenue and
subsequently recognized on a straight-line basis over the term
of the contract or when the service is completed. Revenue from
sales of third-party extended warranty and service contracts,
which we are not obligated to perform, is recognized on a net
basis at the time of sale. All other revenue is recognized on a
gross basis.
We record reductions to revenue for estimated customer sales
returns, rebates, and certain other customer incentive programs.
These reductions to revenue are made based upon reasonable and
reliable estimates that are determined by historical experience,
contractual terms, and current conditions. The primary factors
affecting our accrual for estimated customer returns include
estimated return rates as well as the number of units shipped
that have a right of return that has not expired as of the
balance sheet date. If returns cannot be reliably estimated,
revenue is not recognized until a reliable estimate can be made
or the return right lapses. Each quarter, we reevaluate our
estimates to assess the adequacy of our recorded accruals for
customer returns and allowance for doubtful accounts, and adjust
the amounts as necessary.
We sell our products directly to customers as well as through
indirect channels, including retailers. Sales through our
indirect channels are primarily made under agreements allowing
for limited rights of return, price protection, rebates, and
marketing development funds. We have generally limited the
return rights through contractual caps. Our policy for sales to
indirect channels is to defer, until the return period is over,
the full amount of revenue relative to sales for which the
rights of return apply unless there is sufficient historical
data to establish reasonable and reliable estimates of returns.
To the extent price protection or return rights are not limited
and a reliable estimate cannot be made, all of the revenue and
related cost are deferred until the product has been sold to the
end-user or the rights expire. We record estimated reductions to
revenue or an expense for indirect channel programs at the later
of the offer or the time revenue is recognized.
51
We report revenue net of any revenue-based taxes assessed by
governmental authorities that are imposed on and concurrent with
specific revenue-producing transactions.
Business Combinations and Intangible Assets Including
Goodwill We account for business combinations
using the acquisition method of accounting and accordingly, the
assets and liabilities of the acquired business are recorded at
their fair values at the date of acquisition. The excess of the
purchase price over the estimated fair values is recorded as
goodwill. Any changes in the estimated fair values of the net
assets recorded for acquisitions prior to the finalization of
more detailed analysis, but not to exceed one year from the date
of acquisition, will change the amount of the purchase prices
allocable to goodwill. All acquisition costs are expensed as
incurred and in-process research and development costs are
recorded at fair value as an indefinite-lived intangible asset
and assessed for impairment thereafter until completion, at
which point the asset is amortized over its expected useful
life. Any restructuring charges associated with a business
combination are expensed subsequent to the acquisition date. The
application of business combination and impairment accounting
requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions.
The results of operations of acquired businesses are included in
our Consolidated Financial Statements from the acquisition date.
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for
impairment on an annual basis in the second fiscal quarter, or
sooner if an indicator of impairment occurs. To determine
whether goodwill is impaired, we determine the fair values of
each of our reportable business units using a discounted cash
flow methodology and then compare the fair values to the
carrying values of each reportable business unit. We concluded
that there were no impairment triggering events during Fiscal
2011. At the end of the second quarter of Fiscal 2011, the
annual testing period, our market capitalization, including
common stock held by affiliates, was $25.7 billion compared
to stockholders equity of $6.2 billion. We have
determined that a 10% decrease in the fair value of any one of
our reporting units as of January 28, 2011 would have no
impact on the carrying value of our goodwill. Though we believe
our estimates are reasonable, these fair values require the use
of managements assumptions, which would not reflect
unanticipated events and circumstances that may occur.
Warranty Liabilities We record warranty
liabilities at the time of sale for the estimated costs that may
be incurred under the terms of the limited warranty. The
specific warranty terms and conditions vary depending upon the
product sold and the country in which we do business, but
generally include technical support, parts, and labor over a
period ranging from one to three years. Factors that affect our
warranty liability include the number of installed units
currently under warranty, historical and anticipated rates of
warranty claims on those units, and cost per claim to satisfy
our warranty obligation. The anticipated rate of warranty claims
is the primary factor impacting our estimated warranty
obligation. The other factors are less significant due to the
fact that the average remaining aggregate warranty period of the
covered installed base is approximately 15 months, repair
parts are generally already in stock or available at
pre-determined prices, and labor rates are generally arranged at
pre-established amounts with service providers. Warranty claims
are reasonably predictable based on historical experience of
failure rates. If actual results differ from our estimates, we
revise our estimated warranty liability to reflect such changes.
Each quarter, we reevaluate our estimates to assess the adequacy
of the recorded warranty liabilities and adjust the amounts as
necessary.
Income Taxes We calculate a provision for
income taxes using the asset and liability method, under which
deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized by
identifying the temporary differences arising from the different
treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. We provide
related valuation allowances for deferred tax assets, where
appropriate. In determining the future tax consequences of
events that have been recognized in our financial statements or
tax returns, judgment is required. Differences between the
anticipated and actual outcomes of these future tax consequences
could have a material impact on our consolidated results of
operations or financial position. Additionally, we use tax
planning strategies as a part of our global tax compliance
program. Judgments and interpretation of statutes are inherent
in this process.
While we believe our tax return positions are sustainable, we
recognize tax benefits from uncertain tax positions in the
financial statements only when it is more likely than not that
the positions will be sustained upon examination, including
resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based
on the technical merits and a consideration of the relevant
taxing authoritys administrative practices and precedents.
The determination of income tax expense
52
related to these positions requires management judgment as well
as use of estimates. We believe we have provided adequate
reserves for all uncertain tax positions.
Loss Contingencies We are subject to the
possibility of various losses arising in the ordinary course of
business. We consider the likelihood of loss or impairment of an
asset or the incurrence of a liability, as well as our ability
to reasonably estimate the amount of loss, in determining loss
contingencies. An estimated loss contingency is accrued when it
is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has
been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably
estimated. We regularly evaluate current information available
to us to determine whether such accruals should be adjusted and
whether new accruals are required. Third parties have in the
past and may in the future assert claims or initiate litigation
related to exclusive patent, copyright, and other intellectual
property rights to technologies and related standards that are
relevant to us. If any infringement or other intellectual
property claim made against us by any third party is successful,
or if we fail to develop non-infringing technology or license
the proprietary rights on commercially reasonable terms and
conditions, our business, operating results, and financial
condition could be materially and adversely affected.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Elements and Revenue
Arrangements with Software Elements In
September 2009, the Emerging Issues Task Force of the FASB
reached a consensus on two issues which affects the timing of
revenue recognition. The first consensus changes the level of
evidence of standalone selling price required to separate
deliverables in a multiple deliverable revenue arrangement by
allowing a company to make its best estimate of the selling
price of deliverables when more objective evidence of selling
price is not available and eliminates the residual method. The
consensus applies to multiple deliverable revenue arrangements
that are not accounted for under other accounting pronouncements
and retains the use of VSOE if available and third-party
evidence of selling price or estimated selling price when VSOE
is unavailable. The second consensus excludes sales of tangible
products that contain essential software elements, that is,
software enabled devices, from the scope of revenue recognition
requirements for software arrangements. We elected to early
adopt this accounting guidance at the beginning of the first
quarter of Fiscal 2011 on a prospective basis for applicable
transactions originating or materially modified after
January 29, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not
have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
Variable Interest Entities and Transfers of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities In
June 2009, the FASB issued a new pronouncement on transfers
of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities, which
removes the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity and
removes the exception from applying variable interest entity
accounting to qualifying special-purpose entities. The
pronouncement on variable interest entities requires an entity
to perform an ongoing analysis to determine whether the
entitys variable interest or interests give it a
controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity.
The pronouncements were effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2009. We adopted the pronouncements at
the beginning of the first quarter of Fiscal 2011. The adoption
of these two pronouncements resulted in the consolidation of our
two qualifying special purpose entities. See Note 4 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Part II Item 8 Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data for additional
information on the impact of consolidation to our financial
position, net income, and cash flows.
Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for
Credit Losses In July 2010, FASB issued an
accounting pronouncement that requires enhanced disclosures
regarding the nature of credit risk inherent in an entitys
portfolio of financing receivables, how that risk is analyzed,
and the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance
for credit losses. The new disclosures require information for
both the financing receivables and the related allowance for
credit losses at more disaggregated levels. Disclosures related
to information as of the end of a reporting period became
effective for us in Fiscal 2011. Specific disclosures regarding
activities that occur during a reporting period will be required
for us beginning in the first quarter of Fiscal 2012. As these
changes only relate to disclosures, they will not have an impact
on our consolidated financial results.
53
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and
Shareholders of Dell Inc.:
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in
the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Dell Inc. and its subsidiaries (the
Company) at January 28, 2011 and
January 29, 2010, and the results of their operations and
their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
January 28, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our
opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
January 28, 2011, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible
for these financial statements, for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, included in Managements Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A.
Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial
statements, and on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted
our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement and whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
As described in Note 1, in Fiscal 2011, the Company changed
the manner in which it accounts for variable interest entities
and transfers of financial assets and extinguishments of
liabilities; and, in Fiscal 2010, the Company changed the manner
in which it accounts for business combinations.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Austin, Texas
March 15, 2011
56
DELL
INC.
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
13,913
|
|
|
$
|
10,635
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
6,493
|
|
|
|
5,837
|
|
Financing receivables, net
|
|
|
3,643
|
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
3,219
|
|
|
|
3,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
29,021
|
|
|
|
24,245
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,953
|
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
781
|
|
Long-term financing receivables, net
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
4,365
|
|
|
|
4,074
|
|
Purchased intangible assets, net
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
|
|
1,694
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
38,599
|
|
|
$
|
33,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
$
|
851
|
|
|
$
|
663
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
11,293
|
|
|
|
11,373
|
|
Accrued and other
|
|
|
4,181
|
|
|
|
3,884
|
|
Short-term deferred services revenue
|
|
|
3,158
|
|
|
|
3,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
19,483
|
|
|
|
18,960
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
5,146
|
|
|
|
3,417
|
|
Long-term deferred services revenue
|
|
|
3,518
|
|
|
|
3,029
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
2,686
|
|
|
|
2,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
30,833
|
|
|
|
28,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and capital in excess of $.01 par value; shares
authorized: 7,000; shares issued: 3,369 and 3,351, respectively;
shares outstanding: 1,918 and 1,957, respectively
|
|
|
11,797
|
|
|
|
11,472
|
|
Treasury stock at cost: 976 and 919 shares, respectively
|
|
|
(28,704
|
)
|
|
|
(27,904
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
24,744
|
|
|
|
22,110
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
7,766
|
|
|
|
5,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
38,599
|
|
|
$
|
33,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
57
DELL
INC.
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
$
|
50,002
|
|
|
$
|
43,697
|
|
|
$
|
52,337
|
|
Services, including software related
|
|
|
11,492
|
|
|
|
9,205
|
|
|
|
8,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
|
61,494
|
|
|
|
52,902
|
|
|
|
61,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
42,068
|
|
|
|
37,534
|
|
|
|
44,670
|
|
Services, including software related
|
|
|
8,030
|
|
|
|
6,107
|
|
|
|
5,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of net revenue
|
|
|
50,098
|
|
|
|
43,641
|
|
|
|
50,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
11,396
|
|
|
|
9,261
|
|
|
|
10,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative
|
|
|
7,302
|
|
|
|
6,465
|
|
|
|
7,102
|
|
Research, development, and engineering
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
7,963
|
|
|
|
7,089
|
|
|
|
7,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
3,433
|
|
|
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
3,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other, net
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
3,350
|
|
|
|
2,024
|
|
|
|
3,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2,635
|
|
|
$
|
1,433
|
|
|
$
|
2,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,944
|
|
|
|
1,954
|
|
|
|
1,980
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
|
|
1,986
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
58
DELL
INC.
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2,635
|
|
|
$
|
1,433
|
|
|
$
|
2,478
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
769
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on monetary assets and
liabilities
denominated in foreign currencies
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
86
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts including financing
receivables
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
Other
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(707
|
)
|
|
|
(660
|
)
|
|
|
480
|
|
Financing receivables
|
|
|
(709
|
)
|
|
|
(1,085
|
)
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|
|
309
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
2,833
|
|
|
|
(3,117
|
)
|
Deferred services revenue
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
Accrued and other liabilities
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash from operating activities
|
|
|
3,969
|
|
|
|
3,906
|
|
|
|
1,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
(1,360
|
)
|
|
|
(1,383
|
)
|
|
|
(1,584
|
)
|
Maturities and sales
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(444
|
)
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
|
(440
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of facility and land
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Purchase of financing receivables
|
|
|
(430
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Collections on purchased financing receivables
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Acquisition of business, net of cash received
|
|
|
(376
|
)
|
|
|
(3,613
|
)
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash from investing activities
|
|
|
(1,165
|
)
|
|
|
(3,809
|
)
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(800
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,867
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock under employee plans
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Issuance (repayment) of commercial paper (maturity 90 days
or less), net
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Proceeds from debt
|
|
|
3,069
|
|
|
|
2,058
|
|
|
|
1,519
|
|
Repayments of debt
|
|
|
(1,630
|
)
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash from financing activities
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
2,012
|
|
|
|
(1,406
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
3,278
|
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
|
|
|
10,635
|
|
|
|
8,352
|
|
|
|
7,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period
|
|
$
|
13,913
|
|
|
$
|
10,635
|
|
|
$
|
8,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax paid
|
|
$
|
435
|
|
|
$
|
434
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
59
DELL
INC.
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Excess
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
of Par Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
Retained
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Income/(Loss)
|
|
Total
|
Balances at February 1, 2008
|
|
|
3,320
|
|
|
$
|
10,589
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
$
|
(25,037
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,199
|
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,735
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,478
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,478
|
|
Change in net unrealized gain or loss on investments, net of
taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Change in net unrealized gain or loss on derivative instruments,
net of taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,803
|
|
Stock issuances under employee plans and
other(a)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
(2,867
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,867
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
Net tax benefit from employee stock plans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at January 30, 2009
|
|
|
3,338
|
|
|
|
11,189
|
|
|
|
919
|
|
|
|
(27,904
|
)
|
|
|
20,677
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
4,271
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
Change in net unrealized gain or loss on investments, net of
taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Change in net unrealized gain or loss on derivative instruments,
net of taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
Stock issuances under employee plans and
other(a)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
Net tax shortfall from employee stock plans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at January 29, 2010
|
|
|
3,351
|
|
|
|
11,472
|
|
|
|
919
|
|
|
|
(27,904
|
)
|
|
|
22,110
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
5,641
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,635
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,635
|
|
Adjustment to consolidate variable interest entities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Change in net unrealized gain or loss on investments, net of
taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Change in net unrealized gain or loss on derivative instruments,
net of taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
Stock issuances under employee plans and
other(a)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(800
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(800
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
Net tax shortfall from employee stock plans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at January 28, 2011
|
|
|
3,369
|
|
|
$
|
11,797
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
$
|
(28,704
|
)
|
|
$
|
24,744
|
|
|
$
|
(71
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Stock issuance under employee plans
is net of shares held for employee taxes.
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
60
DELL
INC.
NOTE 1
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Description of Business Dell Inc., a Delaware
corporation (both individually and together with its
consolidated subsidiaries, Dell), offers a broad
range of technology product categories, including mobility
products, desktop PCs, software and peripherals, servers and
networking products, storage, and services. Dell sells its
products and services directly to customers through dedicated
sales representatives, telephone-based sales, and online at
www.dell.com, and through a variety of indirect sales
channels. Dells business segments are Large Enterprise,
Public, Small and Medium Business and Consumer. References to
Commercial business refer to Large Enterprise, Public, and Small
and Medium Business.
Fiscal Year Dells fiscal year is the 52
or 53 week period ending on the Friday nearest
January 31. The fiscal years ended January 28, 2011,
January 29, 2010, and January 30, 2009, included
52 weeks.
Principles of Consolidation The accompanying
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Dell
Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAP). All significant
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial
statements in accordance with GAAP requires the use of
managements estimates. These estimates are subjective in
nature and involve judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at fiscal year-end, and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the fiscal year. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents All highly liquid
investments, including credit card receivables due from banks,
with original maturities of three months or less at date of
purchase, are reported at fair value and are considered to be
cash equivalents. All other investments not considered to be
cash equivalents are separately categorized as investments.
Investments Dells investments are
primarily in debt securities, which are classified as
available-for-sale
and are reported at fair value (based primarily on quoted prices
and market observable inputs) using the specific identification
method. Unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, are reported
as a component of stockholders equity. Realized gains and
losses on investments are included in interest and other, net.
An impairment loss will be recognized and will reduce an
investments carrying amount to its fair market value when
a decline in the fair market value of an individual security
below its cost or carrying value is determined to be other than
temporary.
Dell reviews its investment portfolio quarterly to determine if
any investment is other than temporarily impaired. Dell
determines an impairment is other than temporary when there is
intent to sell the security, it is more likely than not that the
security will be required to be sold before recovery in value or
it is not expected to recover its entire amortized cost basis
(credit related loss). However, if Dell does not
expect to sell a debt security, it still evaluates expected cash
flows to be received and determines if a credit-related loss
exists. In the event of a credit-related loss, only the amount
of impairment associated with the credit-related loss is
recognized in earnings. Amounts relating to factors other than
credit-related losses are recorded in other comprehensive
income. See Note 3 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information.
Financing Receivables Financing receivables
consist of customer receivables, residual interest and retained
interest in securitized receivables. Customer receivables
include revolving loans and fixed-term leases and loans
resulting from the sale of Dell products and services. Based on
how Dell assesses risk and determines the appropriate allowance
levels, Dell has two portfolio segments, (1) fixed-term
leases and loans and (2) revolving loans. Portfolio
segments are further segregated into classes based on operating
segment and whether the receivable was owned by Dell since its
inception or was purchased subsequent to its inception.
Financing receivables are presented net of the allowance for
losses. See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information.
61
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Asset Securitization Dell enters into
securitization transactions to transfer certain financing
receivables for fixed-term leases and loans to special purpose
entities. During Fiscal 2011, Dell adopted the new accounting
guidance that removes the concept of a qualifying special
purpose entity and removes the exception from applying variable
interest entity accounting. The adoption of the new guidance
requires an entity to perform an ongoing analysis to determine
whether the entitys variable interest or interests give it
a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity.
The adoption of the new guidance resulted in Dells
consolidation of its two qualifying special purpose entities
with asset securitizations now being accounted for as secured
borrowings. See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information on the impact of the
consolidation.
Prior to Fiscal 2011, these receivables were removed from the
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position at the time they
were sold. Receivables were considered sold when the receivables
were transferred beyond the reach of Dells creditors, the
transferee had the right to pledge or exchange the assets, and
Dell had surrendered control over the rights and obligations of
the receivables. Gains and losses from the sale of fixed-term
leases and loans were recognized in the period the sale
occurred, based upon the relative fair value of the assets sold
and the remaining retained interest. Retained interest was
recognized at fair value with any changes in fair value recorded
in earnings. In estimating the value of retained interest, Dell
made a variety of financial assumptions, including pool credit
losses, payment rates, and discount rates. These assumptions
were supported by both Dells historical experience and
anticipated trends relative to the particular receivable pool.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Dell
recognizes an allowance for losses on accounts receivable in an
amount equal to the estimated probable losses net of recoveries.
The allowance is based on an analysis of historical bad debt
experience, current receivables aging, and expected future
write-offs, as well as an assessment of specific identifiable
customer accounts considered at risk or uncollectible. The
expense associated with the allowance for doubtful accounts is
recognized as selling, general, and administrative expense.
Allowance for Financing Receivables Losses
Dell recognizes an allowance for losses on financing receivables
in an amount equal to the probable losses net of recoveries. The
allowance for losses is generally determined at the aggregate
portfolio level based on a variety of factors, including
historical and anticipated experience, past due receivables,
receivable type, and customer risk profile. Customer account
principal and interest are charged to the allowance for losses
when an account is deemed to be uncollectible or when the
account is 180 days delinquent. While Dell does not place
financing receivables on non-accrual status during the
delinquency period, accrued interest is included in the
allowance for loss calculation and Dell is therefore adequately
reserved in the event of charge off. Recoveries on receivables
previously charged off as uncollectible are recorded to the
allowance for financing receivables losses. The expense
associated with the allowance for financing receivables losses
is recognized as cost of net revenue. Both fixed and revolving
receivable loss rates are affected by macro-economic conditions
including the level of GDP growth, unemployment rates, the level
of commercial capital equipment investment, and the credit
quality of the borrower. See Note 4 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Inventories Inventories are stated at the
lower of cost or market with cost being determined on a
first-in,
first-out basis.
Property, Plant, and Equipment Property,
plant, and equipment are carried at depreciated cost.
Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the
estimated economic lives of the assets, which range from ten to
thirty years for buildings and two to five years for all other
assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of
five years or the lease term. Gains or losses related to
retirements or disposition of fixed assets are recognized in the
period incurred. Dell capitalizes eligible internal-use software
development costs incurred subsequent to the completion of the
preliminary project stage. Development costs are amortized over
the shorter of the expected useful life of the software or five
years.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Dell reviews
long-lived assets for impairment when circumstances indicate the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable based on the
undiscounted future cash flows of the asset. If the carrying
amount of the asset is determined not to be recoverable, a
write-down to fair value is recorded. Fair values
62
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
are determined based on quoted market values, discounted cash
flows, or external appraisals, as applicable. Dell reviews
long-lived assets for impairment at the individual asset or the
asset group level for which the lowest level of independent cash
flows can be identified.
Business Combinations and Intangible Assets Including
Goodwill During Fiscal 2010, Dell adopted the
new guidance from the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) on business combinations and non-controlling
interests. Dell accounts for business combinations using the
acquisition method of accounting and accordingly, the assets and
liabilities of the acquired business are recorded at their fair
values at the date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase
price over the estimated fair values is recorded as goodwill.
Any changes in the estimated fair values of the net assets
recorded for acquisitions prior to the finalization of more
detailed analysis, but not to exceed one year from the date of
acquisition, will change the amount of the purchase prices
allocable to goodwill. All acquisition costs are expensed as
incurred and in-process research and development costs are
recorded at fair value as an indefinite-lived intangible asset
and assessed for impairment thereafter until completion, at
which point the asset is amortized over its expected useful
life. Any restructuring charges associated with a business
combination are expensed subsequent to the acquisition date. The
results of operations of acquired businesses are included in the
Consolidated Financial Statements from the acquisition date.
Identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are amortized
over their estimated useful lives. They are generally amortized
on a non-straight line approach based on the associated
projected cash flows in order to match the amortization pattern
to the pattern in which the economic benefits of the assets are
expected to be consumed. Intangible assets are reviewed for
impairment if indicators of potential impairment exist. Goodwill
and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment
on an annual basis in the second fiscal quarter, or sooner if an
indicator of impairment occurs.
Foreign Currency Translation The majority of
Dells international sales are made by international
subsidiaries, most of which have the U.S. dollar as their
functional currency. Dells subsidiaries that do not have
the U.S. dollar as their functional currency translate assets
and liabilities at current rates of exchange in effect at the
balance sheet date. Revenue and expenses from these
international subsidiaries are translated using the monthly
average exchange rates in effect for the period in which the
items occur.
Local currency transactions of international subsidiaries that
have the U.S. dollar as the functional currency are remeasured
into U.S. dollars using current rates of exchange for monetary
assets and liabilities and historical rates of exchange for
non-monetary assets and liabilities. Gains and losses from
remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities are included in
interest and other, net. See Note 6 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Hedging Instruments Dell uses derivative
financial instruments, primarily forwards, options, and swaps,
to hedge certain foreign currency and interest rate exposures.
The relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items
are formally documented, as well as the risk management
objectives and strategies for undertaking hedge transactions.
Dell does not use derivatives for speculative purposes.
All derivative instruments are recognized as either assets or
liabilities on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
and are measured at fair value. Hedge accounting is applied
based upon the criteria established by accounting guidance for
derivative instruments and hedging activities. Derivatives are
assessed for hedge effectiveness both at the onset of the hedge
and at regular intervals throughout the life of the derivative.
Any hedge ineffectiveness is recognized currently in earnings as
a component of interest and other, net. Dells hedge
portfolio includes derivatives designated as both cash flow and
fair value hedges.
For derivative instruments that are designated as cash flow
hedges, hedge ineffectiveness is measured by comparing the
cumulative change in the fair value of the hedge contract with
the cumulative change in the fair value of the hedged item, both
of which are based on forward rates. Dell records the effective
portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (OCI),
as a separate component of
63
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
stockholders equity and reclassifies the gain or loss into
earnings in the period during which the hedged transaction is
recognized in earnings.
For derivatives that are designated as fair value hedges, hedge
ineffectiveness is measured by calculating the periodic change
in the fair value of the hedge contract and the periodic change
in the fair value of the hedged item. To the extent that these
fair value changes do not fully offset each other, the
difference is recorded as ineffectiveness in earnings as a
component of interest and other, net.
For derivatives that are not designated as hedges or do not
qualify for hedge accounting treatment, Dell recognizes the
change in the instruments fair value currently in earnings
as a component of interest and other, net.
Cash flows from derivative instruments are presented in the same
category on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as the
cash flows from the underlying hedged items. See Note 6 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a full
description of Dells derivative financial instrument
activities.
Treasury Stock Dell accounts for treasury
stock under the cost method and includes treasury stock as a
component of stockholders equity.
Revenue Recognition Net revenues include
sales of hardware, software and peripherals, and services. Dell
recognizes revenue for these products when it is realized or
realizable and earned. Revenue is considered realized and earned
when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has
occurred or services have been rendered; Dells fee to its
customer is fixed and determinable; and collection of the
resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Dell classifies
revenue and cost of revenue related to standalone software sold
with Post Contract Support (PCS) in the same line
item as services on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Services revenue and cost of services revenue captions on the
Consolidated Statements of Income include Dells services
and software from Dells software and peripherals product
category. This software revenue and related costs include
software license fees and related PCS that is sold separately
from computer systems through Dells software and
peripherals product category.
Products
Revenue from the sale of products is recognized when title and
risk of loss passes to the customer. Delivery is considered
complete when products have been shipped to Dells
customer, title and risk of loss has transferred to the
customer, and customer acceptance has been satisfied. Customer
acceptance is satisfied through obtaining acceptance from the
customer, the acceptance provision lapses, or Dell has evidence
that the acceptance provisions have been satisfied.
Dell records reductions to revenue for estimated customer sales
returns, rebates, and certain other customer incentive programs.
These reductions to revenue are made based upon reasonable and
reliable estimates that are determined by historical experience,
contractual terms, and current conditions. The primary factors
affecting Dells accrual for estimated customer returns
include estimated return rates as well as the number of units
shipped that have a right of return that has not expired as of
the balance sheet date. If returns cannot be reliably estimated,
revenue is not recognized until a reliable estimate can be made
or the return right lapses.
Dell sells its products directly to customers as well as through
indirect channels, including retailers. Sales through
Dells indirect channels are primarily made under
agreements allowing for limited rights of return, price
protection, rebates, and marketing development funds. Dell has
generally limited the return rights through contractual caps.
Dells policy for sales through indirect channels is to
defer the full amount of revenue relative to sales for which the
rights of return apply unless there is sufficient historical
data to establish reasonable and reliable estimates of returns.
To the extent price protection or return rights are not limited
and a reliable estimate cannot be made, all of the revenue and
related costs are deferred until the product has been sold to
the end-user or the rights expire. Dell records estimated
reductions to
64
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
revenue or an expense for indirect channel programs at the later
of the offer or the time revenue is recognized.
Dell defers the cost of shipped products awaiting revenue
recognition until revenue is recognized.
Services
Services include transactional, outsourcing and project-based
offerings. Revenue is recognized for services contracts as
earned, which is generally on a straight line basis over the
term of the contract or on a proportional performance basis as
the services are rendered and Dells obligations are
fulfilled. Revenue from time and materials or cost-plus
contracts is recognized as the services are performed. Revenue
from fixed price contracts is recognized on a straight line
basis, unless revenues is earned and obligations are fulfilled
in a different pattern. These service contracts may include
provisions for cancellation, termination, refunds, or service
level adjustments. These contract provisions would not have a
significant impact on recognized revenue as Dell generally
recognizes revenue for these contracts as the services are
performed.
For sales of extended warranties with a separate contract price,
Dell defers revenue equal to the separately stated price.
Revenue associated with undelivered elements is deferred and
recorded when delivery occurs or services are provided. Revenue
from extended warranty and service contracts, for which Dell is
obligated to perform, is recorded as deferred revenue and
subsequently recognized over the term of the contract on a
straight-line basis.
Revenue from sales of third-party extended warranty and service
contracts or software PCS, for which Dell is not obligated to
perform, and for which Dell does not meet the criteria for gross
revenue recognition under the guidance of the FASB , is
recognized on a net basis. All other revenue is recognized on a
gross basis.
Software
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with industry
specific software accounting guidance for all software and PCS
that are not essential to the functionality of the hardware.
Accounting for software that is essential to the functionality
of the hardware is accounted for as specified below in
Multiple Deliverables. Dell has established vendor
specific objective evidence (VSOE) on a limited
basis for certain software offerings. When Dell has not
established VSOE to support a separation of the software license
and PCS elements, the revenue and related costs are generally
recognized over the term of the agreement.
As more fully explained in Recently Issued and Adopted
Accounting Pronouncements below, effective with the first
quarter of Fiscal 2011, certain Dell storage products are no
longer included in the scope of the software revenue recognition
guidance. Prior to the new guidance, Dell established fair value
for PCS for these products based on VSOE and used the residual
method to allocate revenue to the delivered elements. Under the
new guidance, the revenue for what was previously deemed PCS is
now considered part of a multiple deliverable arrangement. As
such, any discount is allocated to all elements based on the
relative selling price of both delivered and undelivered
elements. The impact of applying this new guidance was not
material to Dells Consolidated Financial Statements for
Fiscal 2011 or 2010.
Multiple Deliverables
Dells multiple deliverable arrangements generally include
hardware products that are sold with essential software or
services such as extended warranty, installation, maintenance,
and other services contracts. The nature and terms of these
multiple deliverable arrangements will vary based on the
customized needs of Dells customers. Each of these
deliverables in an arrangement typically represents a separate
unit of accounting. Dells service contracts may include a
combination of services arrangements including
65
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
deployment, asset recovery, recycling, IT outsourcing,
consulting, applications development, applications maintenance,
and business process services. As more fully explained in
Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
below, effective with the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, Dell
allocated revenue to all deliverables based on their relative
selling prices. The new guidance permits a company to make its
best estimate of the selling price of deliverables when more
objective evidence of selling price is not available. The
hierarchy to be used to determine the selling price to be used
for allocating revenue to deliverables is: (1) VSOE,
(2) third-party evidence of selling price
(TPE), and (3) best estimate of the selling
price (ESP). A majority of Dell product and service
offerings are sold on a standalone basis. Because selling price
is generally available based on standalone sales, Dell has
limited application of TPE, as determined by comparison of
pricing for products and services to the pricing of similar
products and services as offered by Dell or its competitors in
standalone sales to similarly situated customers. As new
products are introduced in future periods, Dell may be required
to use TPE or ESP, depending on the specific facts at the time.
For Fiscal 2010 and Fiscal 2009, pursuant to the previous
guidance for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple
Deliverables, Dell allocated revenue from multiple element
arrangements to the elements based on the relative fair value of
each element, which was generally based on the relative sales
price of each element when sold separately. The adoption of the
new guidance in the first quarter of Fiscal 2011 did not change
the manner in which Dell accounts for its multiple deliverable
arrangements as Dell did not use the residual method for the
majority of its offerings and its services offerings are
generally sold on a standalone basis where evidence of selling
price is available.
Other
Dell records revenue from the sale of equipment under sales-type
leases as product revenue at the inception of the lease.
Sales-type leases also produce financing income, which is
included in net revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Income
and is recognized at consistent rates of return over the lease
term. Customer revolving loan financing income is also included
in net revenue and recognized on an accrual basis.
Dell reports revenue net of any revenue-based taxes assessed by
governmental authorities that are imposed on and concurrent with
specific revenue-producing transactions.
Warranty Liabilities Dell records warranty
liabilities for its standard limited warranty at the time of
sale for the estimated costs that may be incurred under its
limited warranty. The specific warranty terms and conditions
vary depending upon the product sold and the country in which
Dell does business, but generally includes technical support,
parts, and labor over a period ranging from one to three years.
Factors that affect Dells warranty liability include the
number of installed units currently under warranty, historical
and anticipated rates of warranty claims on those units, and
cost per claim to satisfy Dells warranty obligation. The
anticipated rate of warranty claims is the primary factor
impacting the estimated warranty obligation. The other factors
are less significant due to the fact that the average remaining
aggregate warranty period of the covered installed base is
approximately 15 months, repair parts are generally already
in stock or available at pre-determined prices, and labor rates
are generally arranged at pre-established amounts with service
providers. Warranty claims are relatively predictable based on
historical experience of failure rates. If actual results differ
from the estimates, Dell revises its estimated warranty
liability. Each quarter, Dell reevaluates its estimates to
assess the adequacy of its recorded warranty liabilities and
adjusts the amounts as necessary.
Vendor Rebates Dell may receive consideration
from vendors in the normal course of business. Certain of these
funds are rebates of purchase price paid and others are related
to reimbursement of costs incurred by Dell to sell the
vendors products. Dell recognizes a reduction of cost of
goods sold and inventory if the funds are a reduction of the
price of the vendors products. If the consideration is a
reimbursement of costs incurred by Dell to sell or develop the
vendors products, then the consideration is classified as
a reduction of that cost in the Consolidated Statements of
66
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Income, most often operating expenses. In order to be recognized
as a reduction of operating expenses, the reimbursement must be
for a specific, incremental, identifiable cost incurred by Dell
in selling the vendors products or services.
Loss Contingencies Dell is subject to the
possibility of various losses arising in the ordinary course of
business. Dell considers the likelihood of loss or impairment of
an asset or the incurrence of a liability, as well as
Dells ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss,
in determining loss contingencies. An estimated loss contingency
is accrued when it is probable that an asset has been impaired
or a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be
reasonably estimated. Dell regularly evaluates current
information available to determine whether such accruals should
be adjusted and whether new accruals are required.
Shipping Costs Dells shipping and
handling costs are included in cost of sales in the Consolidated
Statements of Income.
Selling, General, and Administrative Selling
expenses include items such as sales salaries and commissions,
marketing and advertising costs, and contractor services. Dell
expenses advertising costs as incurred. General and
administrative expenses include items for Dells
administrative functions, such as Finance, Legal, Human
Resources, and Information Technology support. These functions
include costs for items such as salaries, maintenance and
supplies, insurance, depreciation expense, and allowance for
doubtful accounts.
Research, Development, and Engineering Costs
Research, development, and engineering costs are expensed as
incurred. Research, development, and engineering expenses
primarily include payroll and headcount related costs,
contractor fees, infrastructure costs, and administrative
expenses directly related to research and development support.
Website Development Costs Dell expenses, as
incurred, the costs of maintenance and minor enhancements to the
features and functionality of its websites.
Income Taxes Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recorded based on the difference between the
financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities
using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. Dell calculates a provision
for income taxes using the asset and liability method, under
which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized by
identifying the temporary differences arising from the different
treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. In
determining the future tax consequences of events that have been
recognized in the financial statements or tax returns, judgment
and interpretation of statutes are required. Additionally, Dell
uses tax planning strategies as a part of its global tax
compliance program. Judgments and interpretation of statutes are
inherent in this process.
The accounting guidance for uncertainties in income tax
prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement
recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of
uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income
tax returns. Dell recognizes a tax benefit from an uncertain tax
position in the financial statements only when it is more likely
than not that the position will be sustained upon examination,
including resolution of any related appeals or litigation
processes, based on the technical merits and a consideration of
the relevant taxing authoritys administrative practices
and precedents.
Comprehensive Income Dells
comprehensive income is comprised of net income, unrealized
gains and losses on marketable securities classified as
available-for-sale,
foreign currency translation adjustments, and unrealized gains
and losses on derivative financial instruments related to
foreign currency hedging.
Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share
is based on the weighted-average effect of all common shares
issued and outstanding, and is calculated by dividing net income
by the weighted-average shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income
by the weighted-average number of common shares used in the
basic earnings per share calculation plus the number of common
shares that would be issued assuming exercise or conversion of
all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding. Dell
excludes equity
67
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
instruments from the calculation of diluted earnings per share
if the effect of including such instruments is anti-dilutive.
See Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
for further information on earnings per share.
Stock-Based Compensation Dell measures
stock-based compensation expense for all share-based awards
granted based on the estimated fair value of those awards at
grant-date. The cost of restricted stock units and
performance-based restricted stock units are determined using
the fair market value of Dells common stock on the date of
grant. Dell also has a limited number of performance-based units
that include a market-based condition. The fair value of the
market-condition and performance-condition portion of the award
is estimated using the Monte Carlo simulation valuation model.
The expense recognized for these market-condition and
performance-condition based awards were not material for Fiscal
2011. The fair values of stock option awards are estimated using
a Black-Scholes valuation model. The compensation costs of stock
options, restricted stock units, and awards with a cliff vesting
feature are recognized net of any estimated forfeitures on a
straight-line basis over the employee requisite service period.
Compensation cost for performance based awards is recognized on
a graded accelerated basis net of estimated forfeitures over the
requisite service period. Forfeiture rates are estimated at
grant date based on historical experience and adjusted in
subsequent periods for differences in actual forfeitures from
those estimates. See Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements included for further discussion of
stock-based compensation.
Recently
Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Elements and Revenue
Arrangements with Software Elements In
September 2009, the Emerging Issues Task Force of the FASB
reached a consensus on two issues which affects the timing of
revenue recognition. The first consensus changes the level of
evidence of standalone selling price required to separate
deliverables in a multiple deliverable revenue arrangement by
allowing a company to make its best estimate of the selling
price of deliverables when more objective evidence of selling
price is not available and eliminates the residual method. The
consensus applies to multiple deliverable revenue arrangements
that are not accounted for under other accounting pronouncements
and retains the use of VSOE if available and third-party
evidence of selling price when VSOE is unavailable. The second
consensus excludes sales of tangible products that contain
essential software elements, that is, software enabled devices,
from the scope of revenue recognition requirements for software
arrangements. Dell elected to early adopt this accounting
guidance at the beginning of the first quarter of Fiscal 2011 on
a prospective basis for applicable transactions originating or
materially modified after January 29, 2010. The adoption of
this guidance did not have a material impact to Dells
consolidated financial statements.
Variable Interest Entities and Transfers of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities In
June 2009, the FASB issued a new pronouncement on transfers
of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities which
removes the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity and
removes the exception from applying variable interest entity
accounting to qualifying special purpose entities. See
Asset Securitization above for more information.
Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for
Credit Losses In July 2010, FASB issued a
new pronouncement that requires enhanced disclosures regarding
the nature of credit risk inherent in an entitys portfolio
of financing receivables, how that risk is analyzed, and the
changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for
credit losses. The new disclosures require information for both
the financing receivables and the related allowance for credit
losses at more disaggregated levels. Disclosures related to
information as of the end of a reporting period became effective
for Dell in Fiscal 2011. Specific disclosures regarding
activities that occur during a reporting period will be required
for Dell beginning in the first quarter of Fiscal 2012. As these
changes relate only to disclosures, they will not have an impact
on Dells consolidated financial results.
68
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 2
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following table presents Dells hierarchy for its
assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis as of January 28, 2011, and January 29, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, 2011
|
|
January 29, 2010
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
Other
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
Other
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
$
|
6,261
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
6,261
|
|
|
$
|
7,729
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
7,729
|
|
Commercial Paper
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,945
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,945
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
U.S. government and agencies
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,699
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,699
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Debt Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agencies
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
U.S. corporate
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
583
|
|
International corporate
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
State and municipal governments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Equity and other securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Retained interest
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
6,261
|
|
|
$
|
5,780
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
12,073
|
|
|
$
|
7,729
|
|
|
$
|
1,395
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
9,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following section describes the valuation methodologies Dell
uses to measure financial instruments at fair value:
Cash Equivalents The majority of
Dells cash equivalents in the above table consists of
money market funds, commercial paper, including corporate and
asset-backed commercial paper, and U.S. government and agencies,
all with original maturities of less than ninety days and are
valued at fair value which approximates cost. The valuations of
these securities are based on quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets, when available, or pricing models whereby
all significant inputs are observable or can be derived from or
corroborated by observable market data. When quoted prices are
not available, Dell utilizes a pricing service to assist in
obtaining fair value pricing. Dell conducts reviews on a
quarterly basis to verify pricing, assess liquidity, and
determine if significant inputs have changed that would impact
the fair value hierarchy disclosure.
Debt Securities The majority of
Dells debt securities consists of various fixed income
securities such as U.S. government and agencies, U.S. and
international corporate, and state and municipal bonds. Dell
utilizes a pricing service to assist management in measuring
fair value pricing for the majority of this investment
portfolio. Valuation is based on pricing models whereby all
significant inputs, including benchmark yields, reported trades,
broker-dealer quotes, issue spreads, benchmark securities, bids,
offers and other market related data, are observable or can be
derived from or corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the asset. Inputs are documented
in accordance with the fair value measurements hierarchy. Dell
conducts reviews on a quarterly basis to
69
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
verify pricing, assess liquidity, and determine if significant
valuation inputs have changed that would impact the fair value
hierarchy disclosure. The Level 3 position as of
January 28, 2011, and January 29, 2010, represents a
convertible debt security that Dell was unable to corroborate
with observable market data. The investment is valued at cost
plus accrued interest as this is managements best estimate
of fair value.
Equity and Other Securities The
majority of Dells investments in equity and other
securities consists of various mutual funds held in Dells
Deferred Compensation Plan. The valuation of these securities is
based on pricing models whereby all significant inputs are
observable or can be derived from or corroborated by observable
market data.
Retained Interest The fair value of
the retained interest was determined using a discounted cash
flow model. Significant assumptions to the model included pool
credit losses, payment rates, and discount rates. These
assumptions were supported by both historical experience and
anticipated trends relative to the particular receivable pool.
Retained interest in securitized receivables was included in
financing receivables, short-term and long-term, on the
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. During the first
quarter of Fiscal 2011, Dell consolidated its previously
unconsolidated special purpose entities and as a result, the
retained interest as of January 29, 2010, was eliminated.
See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
for additional information about the consolidation of
Dells previously unconsolidated special purpose entities.
Derivative Instruments Dells
derivative financial instruments consist primarily of foreign
currency forward and purchased option contracts, and interest
rate swaps. The fair value of the portfolio is determined using
valuation models based on market observable inputs, including
interest rate curves, forward and spot prices for currencies,
and implied volatilities. Credit risk is factored into
the fair value calculation of Dells derivative instrument
portfolio. For interest rate derivative instruments, credit risk
is determined at the contract level with the use of credit
default spreads of either Dell, when in a net liability
position, or the relevant counterparty, when in a net asset
position. For foreign exchange derivative instruments, credit
risk is determined in a similar manner, except that the credit
default spread is applied based on the net position of each
counterparty with the use of the appropriate credit default
spreads.
The following table shows a reconciliation of the beginning and
ending balances for fair value measurements using significant
unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the respective
periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28, 2011
|
|
January 29, 2010
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Total
|
|
Interest
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
396
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
423
|
|
Net unrealized gains included in
earnings(a)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Issuances and settlements
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
Transfers out of
Level 3(b)
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
(502
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(502
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
The unrealized gains on U.S.
Corporate represents accrued interest for assets that are still
held at January 28, 2011 and January 29, 2010.
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
See Note 4 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information
about the impact of the special purpose entity consolidation.
|
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a
Nonrecurring Basis Certain assets are
measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and therefore are
not included in the recurring fair value table above. The assets
consist primarily of investments accounted for under the cost
method and non-financial assets such as goodwill and intangible
assets. Investments accounted for under the cost method included
in equity and other securities, approximate $15 million and
$22 million, on January 28, 2011, and January 29,
2010, respectively. Goodwill and intangible assets are measured
at fair value initially and subsequently when there is an
indicator of impairment and
70
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the impairment is recognized. No impairment charges of goodwill
and intangible assets were recorded for the fiscal year ended
January 28, 2011. See Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information about goodwill
and intangible assets.
NOTE 3
INVESTMENTS
The following table summarizes, by major security type, the fair
value and amortized cost of Dells investments. All debt
security investments with remaining maturities in excess of one
year and substantially all equity and other securities are
recorded as long-term investments in the Consolidated Statements
of Financial Position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, 2011
|
|
January 29, 2010
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Cost
|
|
Gain
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
Value
|
|
Cost
|
|
Gain
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agencies
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
U.S. corporate
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
International corporate
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agencies
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
U.S. corporate
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
International corporate
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
State and municipal governments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Equity and other securities
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term investments
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
$
|
1,156
|
|
|
$
|
1,155
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,154
|
|
|
$
|
1,152
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dells investments in debt securities are classified as
available-for-sale.
Equity and other securities primarily relate to investments held
in Dells Deferred Compensation Plan, which are classified
as trading securities. Both of these classes of securities are
reported at fair value using the specific identification method.
All other investments are initially recorded at cost and reduced
for any impairment losses. The fair value of Dells
portfolio is affected primarily by interest rate movements
rather than credit and liquidity risks. Most of Dells
investments in debt securities have contractual maturities of
less than five years.
At January 28, 2011, Dell had 68 debt securities that were
in a loss position with total unrealized losses of
$1 million and a corresponding fair value of
$335 million. As of January 28, 2011, Dell evaluated
debt securities classified as
available-for-sale
for
other-than-temporary-impairment
and the existence of credit losses and concluded no such losses
should be recognized for the fiscal year ended January 28,
2011.
During Fiscal 2011, Fiscal 2010, and Fiscal 2009, gross realized
gains recognized in interest and other, net were
$7 million, $6 million, and $14 million,
respectively. Dell recognized gross realized losses of
$1 million, $4 million, and $24 million,
respectively, during the same periods.
71
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 4
FINANCIAL SERVICES
Dell
Financial Services L.L.C.
Dell offers or arranges various financing options and services
for its business and consumer customers in the U.S. through Dell
Financial Services L.L.C. (DFS), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Dell. DFSs key activities include the
origination, collection, and servicing of customer receivables
related to the purchase of Dell products and services. New
financing originations, which represent the amounts of financing
provided to customers for equipment and related software and
services through DFS, were approximately $3.7 billion, for
both fiscal years ended January 28, 2011, and
January 29, 2010, and $4.5 billion during the fiscal
year ended January 30, 2009.
Dell transfers certain customer financing receivables to special
purpose entities (SPEs). The SPEs are bankruptcy
remote legal entities with separate assets and liabilities. The
purpose of the SPEs is to facilitate the funding of customer
receivables in the capital markets. These SPEs have entered into
financing arrangements with multi-seller conduits that, in turn,
issue asset-backed debt securities in the capital markets.
Dells risk of loss related to securitized receivables is
limited to the amount of Dells right to receive
collections for assets securitized exceeding the amount required
to pay interest, principal, and other fees and expenses related
to the asset-backed securities. Dell provides credit enhancement
to the securitization in the form of over-collateralization.
Prior to Fiscal 2011, the SPE that funds revolving loans was
consolidated, and the two SPEs that fund fixed-term leases and
loans were not consolidated. In accordance with the new
accounting guidance on variable interest entities
(VIEs), and transfers of financial assets and
extinguishment of financial liabilities, Dell determined that
these two SPEs would be consolidated as of the beginning of
Fiscal 2011. The primary factors in this determination were the
obligation to absorb losses due to the interest Dell retains in
the assets transferred to the SPEs in the form of
over-collateralization, and the power to direct activities
through the servicing role performed by Dell. Dell recorded the
assets and liabilities at their carrying amount as of the
beginning of Fiscal 2011, with a $1 million cumulative
effect adjustment decrease to the opening balance of retained
earnings in Fiscal 2011.
Dells securitization programs contain standard structural
features related to the performance of the securitized
receivables. These structural features include defined credit
losses, delinquencies, average credit scores, and excess
collections above or below specified levels. In the event one or
more of these criteria are not met and Dell is unable to
restructure the program, no further funding of receivables will
be permitted and the timing of Dells expected cash flows
from over-collateralization will be delayed. At January 28,
2011, these criteria were met.
Financing
Receivables
The following table summarizes the components of Dells
financing receivables segregated by portfolio segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, 2011
|
|
January 29, 2010
|
|
|
Revolving
|
|
Fixed-term
|
|
Total
|
|
Revolving
|
|
Fixed-term
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Financing Receivables, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer receivables, gross
|
|
$
|
2,396
|
|
|
$
|
1,992
|
|
|
$
|
4,388
|
|
|
$
|
2,046
|
|
|
$
|
824
|
|
|
$
|
2,870
|
|
Allowances for losses
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer receivables, net
|
|
|
2,182
|
|
|
|
1,965
|
|
|
|
4,147
|
|
|
|
1,822
|
|
|
|
811
|
|
|
|
2,633
|
|
Residual interest
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
Retained interest
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing receivables, net
|
|
$
|
2,182
|
|
|
$
|
2,260
|
|
|
$
|
4,442
|
|
|
$
|
1,822
|
|
|
$
|
1,216
|
|
|
$
|
3,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
$
|
2,182
|
|
|
$
|
1,461
|
|
|
$
|
3,643
|
|
|
$
|
1,822
|
|
|
$
|
884
|
|
|
$
|
2,706
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing receivables, net
|
|
$
|
2,182
|
|
|
$
|
2,260
|
|
|
$
|
4,442
|
|
|
$
|
1,822
|
|
|
$
|
1,216
|
|
|
$
|
3,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Prior to the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, customer receivables
were either included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or
held by nonconsolidated securitization SPEs. In prior periods,
Dell had a retained interest in the customer receivables held in
nonconsolidated securitization SPEs. The pro forma table below
shows what customer receivables would have been if the
nonconsolidated securitization SPEs were consolidated as of
January 29, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
(Pro forma)
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Customer receivables, gross:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated receivables
|
|
$
|
4,388
|
|
|
$
|
2,870
|
|
Receivables in previously nonconsolidated SPEs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer receivables, gross
|
|
$
|
4,388
|
|
|
$
|
3,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in financing receivables, net, are receivables that are
held by consolidated VIEs as shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Financing receivables held by consolidated VIEs, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term, net
|
|
$
|
1,087
|
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
Long-term, net
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing receivables held by consolidated VIEs, net
|
|
$
|
1,349
|
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the changes in the allowance for
financing receivable losses for the respective periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 28, 2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Revolving
|
|
Fixed-term
|
|
Total
|
|
Total
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Allowance for financing receivable losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the beginning of period
|
|
$
|
224
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
Incremental allowance due to VIE consolidation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Principal charge-offs
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
Interest charge-offs
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Provision charged to income statement
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the aging of Dells customer
receivables, gross, including accrued interest, as of
January 28, 2011 segregated by class:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Past Due
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 90
|
|
Past Due
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
Days
|
|
> 90 Days
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Revolving Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned since inception
|
|
$
|
1,302
|
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
1,503
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
Revolving SMB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned since inception
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Fixed Large Enterprise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned since inception
|
|
|
1,077
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
Fixed Public
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned since inception
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
Fixed SMB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned since inception
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total customer receivables, gross
|
|
$
|
3,940
|
|
|
$
|
346
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
$
|
4,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables summarize customer receivables, gross,
including accrued interest by credit quality indicator
segregated by class as of January 28, 2011. For revolving
loans to consumers, Dell makes credit decisions based on
propriety scorecards which include the customers credit
history, payment history, credit usage, and other FICO-related
elements. For Commercial customers, an internal grading system
is utilized that assigns a credit level score based on a number
of considerations including liquidity, operating performance and
industry outlook. These credit level scores range from one to
sixteen for Public and Large Enterprise customers, and from one
to six for SMB customers. The categories shown in the tables
below segregate between the relative degrees of credit risk
within that segment and product set. As loss experience varies
substantially between financial products and customer segments,
the credit quality categories cannot be compared between the
different classes. The credit quality indicators for Consumer
accounts are as of January 28, 2011. Commercial accounts
are generally updated on a periodic basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, 2011
|
|
|
FICO 720+
|
|
FICO 660 to 719
|
|
FICO < 660
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Revolving Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned since inception
|
|
$
|
251
|
|
|
$
|
415
|
|
|
$
|
837
|
|
|
$
|
1,503
|
|
Purchased
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
For the revolving consumer receivables in the above table, the
FICO 720+ category includes prime accounts which are generally
higher credit quality, FICO 660 to 719 includes near-prime
accounts and represents the mid-tier accounts, and FICO scores
below 660 are generally
sub-prime
and represent lower credit quality accounts.
74
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, 2011
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
Non-Investment
|
|
Sub-Standard
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Fixed Large Enterprise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned since inception
|
|
$
|
806
|
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
|
$
|
159
|
|
|
$
|
1,131
|
|
Fixed Public
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned since inception
|
|
$
|
438
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
476
|
|
For the Large Enterprise and Public commercial receivables shown
above, Dells internal credit level scoring has been
aggregated to their most comparable external commercial rating
agency equivalents. Investment grade accounts are generally of
the highest credit quality, non-investment grade represents
middle quality accounts, and
sub-standard
represents the lowest quality accounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, 2011
|
|
|
Higher
|
|
Mid
|
|
Lower
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Revolving SMB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned since inception
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
Purchased
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
Fixed SMB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned since inception
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
|
$
|
385
|
|
For SMB receivables in the above table, the Higher category
includes Dells top two internal credit levels, which
generally have the lowest loss experience, Mid includes credit
levels three and four, and Lower includes Dells bottom two
credit levels, which experience higher loss rates. For the SMB
classes, fixed and revolving products are typically sold to
different types of customers. The revolving product is sold
primarily to small business customers and the fixed products are
more weighted toward medium-sized businesses. Although both
fixed and revolving products rely on a six-level internal rating
system, the grading criteria and classifications are different
as the loss performance varies between these products and
customer sets. Therefore, the credit levels are not comparable
between the SMB fixed and revolving classes.
Customer Receivables
The following is the description of the components of
Dells customer receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving loans Revolving loans offered under
private label credit financing programs provide qualified
customers with a revolving credit line for the purchase of
products and services offered by Dell. Revolving loans bear
interest at a variable annual percentage rate that is tied to
the prime rate. Based on historical payment patterns, revolving
loan transactions are typically repaid within 12 months on
average. Revolving loans are included in short-term financing
receivables. From time to time, account holders may have the
opportunity to finance their Dell purchases with special
programs during which, if the outstanding balance is paid in
full by a specific date, no interest is charged. These special
programs generally range from 6 to 12 months. At
January 28, 2011, and January 29, 2010, receivables
under these special programs were $398 million and
$442 million, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Sales-type leases Dell enters into sales-type
lease arrangements with customers who desire lease financing.
Leases with business customers have fixed terms of generally two
to four years. Future maturities of minimum lease payments at
January 28, 2011 for Dell were as follows: Fiscal
2012 $993 million; Fiscal 2013
$638 million; Fiscal 2014 $245 million;
Fiscal 2015 and beyond $30 million. Fixed-term
loans are offered to qualified small businesses, large
commercial accounts, governmental organizations, and educational
entities.
|
75
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Purchased
Credit-Impaired
Loans
Purchased Credit-Impaired (PCI) loans are acquired
loans for which it is probable that Dell will not collect all
contractually required principal and interest payments. During
Fiscal 2011, Dell purchased a portfolio of revolving loan
receivables from CIT Group Inc. (CIT) that consisted
of revolving Dell customer account balances that met the
definition of PCI loans, as Dell does not expect to collect all
contractually required principal and interest payments. These
receivables were purchased for $430 million and had a
principal and accrued interest balance of $570 million at
the date of purchase. Dell expects to collect total cash flows
of approximately $596 million over the term of the
receivables, including future interest billings. At
January 28, 2011, the outstanding balance of these
receivables, including principal and accrued interest, was
$528 million and the carrying amount was $361 million.
Additionally, as part of the purchase of this portfolio, Dell
acquired the rights to future recoveries on previously CIT-owned
Dell revolving accounts that had been charged off as
uncollectible by CIT. Dell does not expect future recoveries
under these rights to be significant.
The excess of cash flows expected to be collected over the
carrying value of PCI loans is referred to as the accretable
yield and is accreted into interest income using the effective
yield method based on the expected future cash flows over the
estimated lives of the PCI loans.
The following table shows activity for the accretable yield on
the PCI loans for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28, 2011
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Accretable Yield:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Additions/ Purchases
|
|
|
166
|
|
Accretion
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, contractually required payments on the PCI loans
were estimated to be approximately $928 million, as of the
date of purchase. The contractually required payments assume all
principal and interest payments are received on all revolving
accounts and no accounts are charged off. Contractual payments
include future interest that would have continued to accrue on
the customer account post charge-off. Due to the nature of these
accounts, both contractual and expected collections were
estimated using consistent expectations of customer payment
behavior that were based on Dells past experience with
this and similar portfolios.
Residual
Interest
Dell retains a residual interest in equipment leased under its
fixed-term lease programs. The amount of the residual interest
is established at the inception of the lease based upon
estimates of the value of the equipment at the end of the lease
term using historical studies, industry data, and future
value-at-risk
demand valuation methods. On a quarterly basis, Dell assesses
the carrying amount of its recorded residual values for
impairment. Anticipated declines in specific future residual
values that are considered to be
other-than-temporary
are recorded currently in earnings.
Asset
Securitizations
|
|
|
|
|
The gross balance of securitized receivables reported
off-balance sheet as of January 29, 2010, was
$774 million, and the associated debt was
$624 million. As discussed above, as of the beginning of
Fiscal 2011, all previously nonconsolidated SPEs were
consolidated. Upon consolidation of these customer receivables
and associated debt at the beginning of Fiscal 2011, Dells
retained interest in securitized
|
76
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
receivables of $151 million at January 29, 2010, was
eliminated. A $1 million decrease to beginning retained
earnings for Fiscal 2011 was recorded as a cumulative effect
adjustment due to adoption of the new accounting guidance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
During Fiscal 2011, Fiscal 2010, and Fiscal 2009,
$1.9 billion, $0.8 billion, and $1.4 billion of
customer receivables, respectively, were funded via
securitization through SPEs. The programs are effective for
12 month periods and subject to an annual renewal process.
During Fiscal 2011, Dell expanded its revolving loan
securitization program with a new program that increased debt
capacity levels. Dell also renewed and expanded one of its
fixed-term lease and loan programs with increased debt capacity
levels, and replaced the other program during Fiscal 2011 with a
new program.
|
|
|
|
The structured financing debt related to the fixed-term lease
and loan, and revolving loan securitization programs was
$1 billion and $788 million as of January 28,
2011, and January 29, 2010, respectively. This debt
included $624 million at January 29, 2010, held by
nonconsolidated SPEs. The debt is collateralized solely by the
financing receivables in the programs. The debt has a variable
interest rate and an average duration of 12 to 36 months
based on the terms of the underlying financing receivables. The
maximum debt capacity related to the securitization programs was
increased to $1.4 billion during Fiscal 2011. See
Note 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information regarding the structured
financing debt.
|
|
|
|
During Fiscal 2011, Dell entered into interest rate swap
agreements to effectively convert a portion of the structured
financing debt from a floating rate to a fixed rate. The
interest rate swaps qualified for hedge accounting treatment as
cash flow hedges. See Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information about interest
rate swaps.
|
Retained
Interest
Prior to adopting the new accounting guidance on VIEs and
transfers of financial assets and extinguishment of financial
liabilities, certain transfers of financial assets to
nonconsolidated qualified SPEs were accounted for as a sale.
Upon the sale of the customer receivables to the SPEs, Dell
recognized a gain on the sale and retained a residual beneficial
interest in the pool of assets sold, referred to as retained
interest. The retained interest represented Dells right to
receive collections for securitized assets that exceed the
amount required to pay interest, principal, and other fees and
expenses.
Retained interest was stated at the present value of the
estimated net beneficial cash flows after payment of all senior
interests. Dell valued the retained interest at the time of each
receivable transfer and at the end of each reporting period. The
fair value of the retained interest was determined using a
discounted cash flow model with various key assumptions,
including payment rates, credit losses, discount rates, and the
remaining life of the receivables sold. These assumptions were
supported by both Dells historical experience and
anticipated trends relative to the particular receivable pool.
The key valuation assumptions for retained interest could have
been affected by many factors, including repayment terms and the
credit quality of receivables securitized.
77
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the activity in retained interest
balances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Retained interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained interest at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
396
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
Issuances
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
Distributions from conduits
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
Net accretion
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Change in fair value for the period
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Impact of special purpose entity consolidation
|
|
|
(502
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained interest at end of the period
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the key assumptions used to
measure the fair value of the retained interest of the fixed
term leases and loans at time of transfer within the fiscal year
ended January 29, 2010 :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Key Assumptions
|
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment
|
|
Credit
|
|
Discount
|
|
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
Losses
|
|
Rates
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
(lifetime)
|
|
(annualized)
|
|
(months)
|
Time of transfer valuation of retained interest
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Net principal charge-offs for securitized leases and loans held
by formerly nonconsolidated special purpose entities were
$70.4 million for Fiscal 2010, which was 6.5% of the
average outstanding securitized financing receivable balance for
the period.
78
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 5
BORROWINGS
The following table summarizes Dells outstanding debt at
the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$400 million issued on June 10, 2009, at 3.375% due
June 2012 (2012 Notes) with interest payable
June 15 and December 15 (includes impact of interest
rate swap terminations)
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
$600 million issued on April 17, 2008, at 4.70% due
April 2013 (2013A Notes) with interest payable
April 15 and October 15 (includes impact of interest
rate swap terminations)
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
$500 million issued on September 7, 2010, at 1.40% due
September 2013 (2013B Notes) with interest
payable March 10 and September 10
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
$500 million issued on April 1, 2009, at 5.625% due
April 2014 (2014 Notes) with interest payable
April 15 and October 15
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
$700 million issued on September 7, 2010, at 2.30% due
September 2015 (2015 Notes) with interest
payable March 10 and September 10
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
$500 million issued on April 17, 2008, at 5.65% due
April 2018 (2018 Notes) with interest payable
April 15 and October 15
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
$600 million issued on June 10, 2009, at 5.875% due
June 2019 (2019 Notes) with interest payable
June 15 and December 15
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
$400 million issued on April 17, 2008, at 6.50% due
April 2038 (2038 Notes) with interest payable
April 15 and October 15
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
$300 million issued on September 7, 2010, at 5.40% due
September 2040 (2040 Notes) with interest
payable March 10 and September 10
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$300 million issued on April 3, 1998 at 7.10% due
April 2028 with interest payable April 15 and
October 15 (includes the impact of interest rate swap
terminations)
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
India term loan: entered into on October 15, 2009 at 8.9%
due October 2011 with interest payable monthly
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Structured financing debt
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
5,146
|
|
|
|
3,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
Structured financing debt
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term debt
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
5,997
|
|
|
$
|
4,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During Fiscal 2011, Dell issued the 2013B Notes, the 2015 Notes,
and the 2040 Notes (collectively, the Fiscal 2011
Notes) under an automatic shelf registration statement
that was filed in November 2008. The net proceeds from the
Fiscal 2011 Notes, after payment of expenses, were approximately
$1.5 billion. The Fiscal 2011 Notes are unsecured
obligations and rank equally in right of payment with
Dells existing and future unsecured senior indebtness. The
Fiscal 2011 Notes effectively rank junior to all indebtness and
other liabilities, including trade payables, of Dells
subsidiaries. The Fiscal 2011 Notes were issued pursuant to a
Supplemental Indenture dated September 10, 2010, between
Dell and a trustee, with terms and conditions substantially the
same as those governing the Notes outstanding as of
January 29, 2010 (such outstanding Notes, together with the
Fiscal 2011 Notes, the Notes).
The estimated fair value of total debt at January 28, 2011,
was approximately $6.1 billion. The fair values of the
structured financing debt, commercial paper, and other
short-term debt approximate their carrying values as their
interest rates vary with the market.
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2011 and fourth quarter of
Fiscal 2010, Dell entered into interest rate swap agreements to
effectively convert the fixed rates of the 2012 Notes and 2013A
Notes to floating rates. The floating rates are based on
six-month or three-month LIBOR plus a fixed rate. In
January 2011, Dell terminated the interest rate swap
agreements with notional amounts totaling $1 billion. The
interest rate swaps qualified for hedge accounting treatment as
fair value hedges at the time they were designated. As a result
of the termination, the fair value adjustment to the carrying
value of the 2012 Notes and 2013A Notes will be amortized to
earnings as a reduction of interest expense over the remaining
life of the debt. The carrying value of the senior debentures,
the 2012 Notes, and the 2013A Notes includes an unamortized
amount related to the termination of interest rate swap
agreements, which were previously designated as hedges of the
debt. See Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information about interest rate swaps.
The indentures governing the Notes, the senior debentures, and
the structured financing debt contain customary events of
default, including failure to make required payments, failure to
comply with certain agreements or covenants, and certain events
of bankruptcy and insolvency. The indentures also contain
covenants limiting Dells ability to create certain liens;
enter into
sale-and-lease
back transactions; and consolidate or merge with, or convey,
transfer or lease all or substantially all of its assets to,
another person. As of January 28, 2011, there were no
events of default with respect to the Notes, the Senior
Debentures, or the structured financing debt.
Aggregate future maturities of long-term debt at face value were
as follows at January 28, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities by Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Aggregate future maturities of long-term debt outstanding
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
595
|
|
|
$
|
1,155
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
700
|
|
|
$
|
2,100
|
|
|
$
|
5,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structured Financing Debt As of
January 28, 2011, Dell had $1.1 billion outstanding in
structured financing related debt primarily through the fixed
term lease and loan and revolving loan securitization programs.
The weighted average interest rate for short-term structured
financing debt for Fiscal 2011 was 0.44%. See Note 4 and
Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
for further discussion on structured financing debt and interest
rate swap agreements that hedge a portion of that debt.
Commercial Paper As of
January 28, 2011, there was no outstanding commercial
paper. As of January 29, 2010, there was $496 million
outstanding under the commercial paper program. The
weighted-average interest rate on the outstanding commercial
paper for Fiscal 2010 was 0.24%.
Dells commercial paper program is $2 billion with
corresponding revolving credit facilities of $2 billion.
Dells credit facilities consist of two agreements, with
$1 billion expiring on June 1, 2011 and the remaining
$1 billion expiring on April 2, 2013. The credit
facilities require compliance with conditions that must be
satisfied prior to any
80
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
borrowing, as well as ongoing compliance with specified
affirmative and negative covenants, including maintenance of a
minimum interest coverage ratio. Dell was in compliance with the
financial covenant as of January 28, 2011. There were no
outstanding advances under the revolving credit facilities as of
January 28, 2011.
NOTE 6
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
Derivative
Instruments
As part of its risk management strategy, Dell uses derivative
instruments, primarily forward contracts and purchased options,
to hedge certain foreign currency exposures and interest rate
swaps to manage the exposure of its debt portfolio to interest
rate risk, as Dell issues long-term debt based on market
conditions at the time of financing. Dells objective is to
offset gains and losses resulting from these exposures with
gains and losses on the derivative contracts used to hedge the
exposures, thereby reducing volatility of earnings and
protecting fair values of assets and liabilities. Dell assesses
hedge effectiveness both at the onset of the hedge and at
regular intervals throughout the life of the derivative and
recognizes any ineffective portion of the hedge, as well as
amounts not included in the assessment of effectiveness, in
earnings as a component of interest and other, net.
Foreign
Exchange Risk
Dell uses a combination of forward contracts and purchased
options designated as cash flow hedges to protect against the
foreign currency exchange rate risks inherent in its forecasted
transactions denominated in currencies other than the U.S.
dollar. The risk of loss associated with purchased options is
limited to premium amounts paid for the option contracts. The
risk of loss associated with forward contracts is equal to the
exchange rate differential from the time the contract is entered
into until the time it is settled. The majority of these
contracts typically expire in 12 months or less. As of
January 28, 2011, and January 29, 2010, the total
notional amount of foreign currency option and forward contracts
designated as cash flow hedges was $5.4 billion and
$4.2 billion, respectively.
Dell assessed hedge ineffectiveness for cash flow hedges for the
fiscal year ended January 28, 2011 and determined that it
was not material. During the fiscal year ended January 28,
2011, Dell did not discontinue any cash flow hedges that had a
material impact on Dells results of operations, as
substantially all forecasted foreign currency transactions were
realized in Dells actual results.
In addition, Dell uses forward contracts to hedge monetary
assets and liabilities, primarily receivables and payables,
denominated in a foreign currency. These contracts generally
expire in three months or less, are considered economic hedges
and are not designated. The change in the fair value of these
instruments represents a natural hedge as their gains and losses
offset the changes in the underlying fair value of the monetary
assets and liabilities due to movements in currency exchange
rates. Dell recognized gains of $59 million during Fiscal
2011, losses of $85 million during Fiscal 2010, and gains
of $189 million during Fiscal 2009, for the change in fair
value of these foreign currency forward contracts. As of
January 28, 2011, and January 29, 2010, the total
notional amount of other foreign currency forward contracts not
designated as hedges was $250 million and $20 million,
respectively.
Interest
Rate Risk
Dell uses interest rate swaps to hedge the variability in cash
flows related to the interest rate payments on structured
financing debt. The interest rate swaps economically convert the
variable rate on the structured financing debt to a fixed
interest rate to match the underlying fixed rate being received
on fixed term customer leases and loans. The duration of these
contracts typically ranges from 30 to 42 months. Certain of
these swaps are designated as cash flow hedges. As of
January 28, 2011, the total notional amount of interest
rate swaps associated with structured financing debt was
$770 million, of which the notional amount designated as
cash flows hedges was $625 million. Hedge ineffectiveness
for interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges was not
material for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2011.
81
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of January 28, 2011, the notional amount of interest
rate swaps associated with structured financing debt not
designated as cash flow hedges was $145 million. The amount
of change in fair value recognized in interest and other, net,
for these interest rate hedges was a $3 million gain for
the fiscal year ended January 28, 2011. Dell did not have
any interest rate swaps associated with structured financing
debt as of January 29, 2010.
Dell also uses interest rate swaps designated as fair value
hedges to modify the market risk exposures in connection with
long-term debt to achieve primarily LIBOR-based floating
interest expense. In January 2011, Dell terminated its fair
value interest rate swap agreements with notional amounts
totaling $1 billion. Dell received $22 million in cash
proceeds from the swap terminations, which included
$3 million in accrued interest. The cash flows from the
terminated swap contracts are reported as operating activities
in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
Hedge ineffectiveness for interest rate swaps designated as fair
value hedges was not material for the fiscal years ended
January 28, 2011 and January 29, 2010.
As of January 29, 2010, the notional amount of interest
rate swaps associated with debt instruments was
$200 million. As a result of the terminations in
January 2011, Dell did not have any interest rate contracts
designated as fair value hedges as of January 28, 2011.
Derivative
Instruments Additional Information
The aggregate unrealized net gain or loss for interest rate
swaps and foreign currency exchange contracts, recorded as a
component of comprehensive income, for the fiscal years ended
January 28, 2011 and January 29, 2010, was a loss of
$111 million and a $1 million gain, respectively.
Dell has reviewed the existence and nature of
credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative trading
agreements with its counterparties. Certain agreements contain
clauses whereby if Dells credit ratings were to fall below
investment grade upon a change of control of Dell,
counterparties would have the right to terminate those
derivative contracts under which Dell is in a net liability
position. As of January 28, 2011, there had been no such
triggering events.
Effect
of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statements of
Financial Position and the Consolidated Statements of
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
|
Reclassified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
OCI, Net
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
Recognized in
|
Derivatives in
|
|
of Tax, on
|
|
(Loss) Reclassified
|
|
OCI into
|
|
(Loss) Recognized
|
|
Income on
|
Cash Flow
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
from Accumulated
|
|
Income
|
|
in Income
|
|
Derivative
|
Hedging
|
|
(Effective
|
|
OCI into Incom
|
|
(Effective
|
|
on Derivative
|
|
(Ineffective
|
Relationships
|
|
Portion)
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
Portion)
|
|
(Ineffective Portion)
|
|
Portion)
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
For the fiscal year ended January 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
$
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
(265
|
)
|
|
Total cost of net revenue
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Interest and other, net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Interest and other, net
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended January 29, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
$
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
(506
|
)
|
|
Total cost of net revenue
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
Interest and other, net
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(506
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair
Value of Derivative Instruments in the Consolidated Statements
of Financial Position
Dell presents its foreign exchange derivative instruments on a
net basis in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
due to the right of offset by its counterparties under master
netting arrangements. The fair value of those derivative
instruments presented on a gross basis for the period is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
Non-
|
|
Other
|
|
Non-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Current
|
|
Current
|
|
Current
|
|
Current
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Value
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
Interest rate contracts in a liability position
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset (liability)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Interest rate contracts in a liability position
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset (liability)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives at fair value
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
(25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
Non-
|
|
Other
|
|
Non-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Current
|
|
Current
|
|
Current
|
|
Current
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Value
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
Interest rate contracts in an asset position
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset (liability)
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset (liability)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives at fair value
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 7
ACQUISITIONS
Fiscal
2011 Acquisitions
Dell completed five acquisitions during Fiscal 2011, Kace
Networks, Inc. (KACE), Ocarina Networks Inc.
(Ocarina), Scalent Systems Inc.
(Scalent), Boomi, Inc. (Boomi), and
InSite One, Inc., (InSite), for a total purchase
consideration of approximately $413 million. KACE is a
systems management appliance company with
83
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
solutions tailored to the requirements of mid-sized businesses.
KACE is being integrated primarily into Dells Small and
Medium Business and Public segments. Ocarina is a provider of
de-duplication solutions and content-aware compression across
storage product lines. Scalent is a provider of scalable and
efficient data center infrastructure software. Boomi is a
provider of on-demand integration technology. Ocarina, Scalent,
and Boomi will be integrated into all of Dells Commercial
segments. InSite provides cloud-based medical data archiving,
storage, and disaster-recovery solutions to the health care
industry. InSite will be integrated into Dells Public
segment.
Dell has recorded these acquisitions using the acquisition
method of accounting and recorded their respective assets and
liabilities at fair value at the date of acquisition. The excess
of the purchase prices over the estimated fair values were
recorded as goodwill. Any changes in the estimated fair values
of the net assets recorded for these acquisitions prior to the
finalization of more detailed analyses, but not to exceed one
year from the date of acquisition, will change the amount of the
purchase prices allocable to goodwill. Any subsequent changes to
the purchase price allocations that are material to Dells
consolidated financial results will be adjusted retroactively.
Dell recorded approximately $284 million in goodwill and
$141 million in intangible assets related to these
acquisitions. The goodwill related to these acquisitions is not
deductible for tax purposes. In conjunction with these
acquisitions, Dell will incur $56 million in
compensation-related expenses that will be expensed over a
period of one to three years. There was no contingent
consideration related to these acquisitions.
Dell has not presented pro forma results of operations for the
Fiscal 2011 acquisitions because these acquisitions are not
material to Dells consolidated results of operations,
financial position, or cash flows on either an individual or an
aggregate basis.
Fiscal
2010 Acquisitions
On November 3, 2009, Dell completed its acquisition of all
the outstanding shares of the Class A common stock of Perot
Systems, a worldwide provider of information technology and
business solutions, for $3.9 billion in cash. This
acquisition is expected to provide customers a broader range of
IT services and solutions and better position Dell for its own
immediate and long-term growth and efficiency. Perot Systems was
primarily integrated into the Large Enterprise and Public
segments for reporting purposes. Perot Systems results of
operations were included in Dells results beginning
November 3, 2009.
The following table summarizes the consideration paid for Perot
Systems and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed recognized at the acquisition date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
410
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
58
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment
|
|
|
323
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
Deferred tax liability,
net(a)
|
|
|
(424
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identifiable net assets
|
|
|
1,551
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
3,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
The deferred tax liability, net
primarily relates to purchased identifiable intangible assets
and property, plant, and equipment and is shown net of
associated deferred tax assets.
|
84
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The goodwill of $2.3 billion represents the value from
combining Perot Systems with Dell to provide customers with a
broader range of IT services and solutions as well as optimizing
how these solutions are delivered. The acquisition has enabled
Dell to supply even more Perot Systems customers with Dell
products and extended the reach of Perot Systems
capabilities to Dell customers around the world. Goodwill of
$679 million, $1,613 million, and $35 million was
assigned to the Large Enterprise, Public, and SMB segments,
respectively.
Identifiable intangible assets included customer relationships,
internally developed software, non-compete agreements, and trade
names and other assets. These intangible assets are being
amortized over their estimated useful lives based on the pattern
of expected future economic benefit, which is generally on a
non-straight-line basis based upon their expected future cash
flows.
The following table summarizes the cost of amortizable
intangible assets related to the acquisition of Perot Systems:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
(years)
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortizable intangible assets
|
|
$
|
1,174
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable was comprised primarily of customer trade
receivables. As such, the fair value of accounts receivable
approximates its carrying value of $410 million. The gross
amount due is $423 million, of which $13 million was
expected to be uncollectible.
In conjunction with the acquisition, Dell incurred
$93 million in cash compensation payments made to former
Perot Systems employees who accepted positions with Dell related
to the acceleration of Perot Systems unvested stock options and
other cash compensation payments. These cash compensation
payments were expensed as incurred and are recorded in selling,
general, and administrative expenses in the Consolidated
Statements of Income for Fiscal 2010. During Fiscal 2010, Dell
incurred $116 million in acquisition-related costs for
Perot Systems, including the payments above, and an additional
$23 million in other acquisition-related costs such as
bankers fees, consulting fees, other employee-related
charges, and integration costs.
There was no contingent consideration related to the acquisition.
The following table provides unaudited pro forma results of
operations for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2010, and
January 30, 2009, as if Perot Systems had been acquired at
the beginning of the fiscal year ended January 30, 2009.
Due to the different fiscal period ends, the pro forma results
for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2010, and
January 30, 2009, are combined with the results of Perot
Systems for the twelve months ended January 29, 2010, and
December 31, 2008, respectively. The pro forma results are
adjusted for intercompany charges, but do not include any
anticipated cost synergies or other effects of the planned
integration of Perot Systems. Accordingly, such pro forma
results are not necessarily indicative of the results that
actually would have occurred had the
85
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
acquisition been completed on the dates indicated, nor are they
indicative of the future operating results of the combined
company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share data, unaudited)
|
Pro forma net sales
|
|
$
|
54,739
|
|
|
$
|
63,835
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$
|
1,422
|
|
|
$
|
2,398
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
Fiscal
2009 Acquisitions
Dell completed three acquisitions in Fiscal 2009, including The
Networked Storage Company, MessageOne, Inc.
(MessageOne), and Allin Corporation
(Allin), for approximately $197 million in
cash. Dell recorded approximately $136 million of goodwill
and approximately $64 million of purchased intangible
assets related to these acquisitions. Dell also expensed
approximately $2 million of in-process research and
development (IPR&D) related to these
acquisitions in Fiscal 2009. The largest of these transactions
was the purchase of MessageOne for approximately
$164 million in cash plus an additional $10 million to
be used for management retention. MessageOne, Allin, and The
Networked Storage Company have been integrated into Dells
Commercial segments.
The acquisition of MessageOne was identified and acknowledged by
Dells Board of Directors as a related party transaction
because Michael Dell and his family held indirect ownership
interests in MessageOne. Consequently, Dells Board of
Directors directed management to implement a series of measures
designed to ensure that the transaction was considered,
analyzed, negotiated, and approved objectively and independent
of any control or influence from the related parties.
Dell has not presented pro forma results of operations for the
Fiscal 2009 acquisitions because these acquisitions were not
material to Dells consolidated results of operations,
financial position, or cash flows on either an individual or an
aggregate basis.
NOTE 8
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
Goodwill allocated to Dells business segments as of
January 28, 2011, and January 29, 2010, and changes in
the carrying amount of goodwill for the respective periods, were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
January 28, 2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Small and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large
|
|
|
|
Medium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise
|
|
Public
|
|
Business
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Total
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
1,361
|
|
|
$
|
2,026
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
298
|
|
|
$
|
4,074
|
|
|
$
|
1,737
|
|
Goodwill acquired during the period
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
2,327
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,424
|
|
|
$
|
2,164
|
|
|
$
|
476
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
$
|
4,365
|
|
|
$
|
4,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill is tested annually during the second fiscal quarter and
whenever events or circumstances indicate an impairment may have
occurred. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its fair
value, estimated based on
86
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
discounted cash flow analyses, an impairment charge would be
recorded. Based on the results of the annual impairment tests,
no impairment of goodwill existed at July 30, 2010.
Further, no triggering events have transpired since
July 30, 2010, that would indicate a potential impairment
of goodwill as of January 28, 2011. Dell does not have any
accumulated goodwill impairment charges as of January 28,
2011. The goodwill adjustments are primarily the result of
contingent purchase price considerations related to prior period
acquisitions and the effects of foreign currency fluctuations.
Intangible
Assets
Dells intangible assets associated with completed
acquisitions at January 28, 2011 and January 29, 2010,
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, 2011
|
|
January 29, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
Amortization
|
|
Net
|
|
Gross
|
|
Amortization
|
|
Net
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
1,363
|
|
|
$
|
(309
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,054
|
|
|
$
|
1,324
|
|
|
$
|
(117
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,207
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
372
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
56
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortizable intangible assets
|
|
|
2,132
|
|
|
|
(688
|
)
|
|
|
1,444
|
|
|
|
2,007
|
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
1,669
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Indefinite lived intangible assets
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
$
|
2,183
|
|
|
$
|
(688
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,495
|
|
|
$
|
2,032
|
|
|
$
|
(338
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During Fiscal 2011, Dell recorded additions to intangible assets
and in-process research and development of $126 million and
$26 million, respectively, which were primarily related to
Dells Fiscal 2011 business acquisitions. During Fiscal
2010, Dell recorded additions to intangible assets of
$1.2 billion, which were related to Dells acquisition
of Perot Systems.
Amortization expense related to finite-lived intangible assets
was approximately $350 million and $205 million in
Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010, respectively. During the fiscal
years ended January 28, 2011, and January 29, 2010,
Dell did not record any impairment charges as a result of its
analysis of its intangible assets.
Estimated future annual pre-tax amortization expense of
finite-lived intangible assets as of January 28, 2011, over
the next five fiscal years and thereafter is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years
|
|
(in millions)
|
2012
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
2013
|
|
|
279
|
|
2014
|
|
|
240
|
|
2015
|
|
|
147
|
|
2016
|
|
|
117
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 9
WARRANTY AND DEFERRED EXTENDED WARRANTY REVENUE
Dell records liabilities for its standard limited warranties at
the time of sale for the estimated costs that may be incurred.
The liability for standard warranties is included in accrued and
other current and other non-current liabilities on the
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Revenue from the
sale of extended warranties is recognized over the term of the
contract or when the service is completed, and the costs
associated with these contracts are recognized as incurred.
Deferred extended warranty revenue is included in deferred
services revenue on the Consolidated Statements of Financial
Position. Changes in Dells liabilities for standard
limited warranties and deferred services revenue related to
extended warranties are presented in the following tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Warranty liability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty liability at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
912
|
|
|
$
|
1,035
|
|
|
$
|
929
|
|
Costs accrued for new warranty contracts and changes in
estimates for pre-existing
warranties(a)(b)
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
Service obligations honored
|
|
|
(1,063
|
)
|
|
|
(1,110
|
)
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty liability at end of period
|
|
$
|
895
|
|
|
$
|
912
|
|
|
$
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
|
$
|
593
|
|
|
$
|
721
|
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty liability at end of period
|
|
$
|
895
|
|
|
$
|
912
|
|
|
$
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Deferred extended warranty revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred extended warranty revenue at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
5,910
|
|
|
$
|
5,587
|
|
|
$
|
5,233
|
|
Revenue deferred for new extended
warranties(b)
|
|
|
3,877
|
|
|
|
3,481
|
|
|
|
3,470
|
|
Revenue recognized
|
|
|
(3,371
|
)
|
|
|
(3,158
|
)
|
|
|
(3,116
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred extended warranty revenue at end of period
|
|
$
|
6,416
|
|
|
$
|
5,910
|
|
|
$
|
5,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
$
|
2,959
|
|
|
$
|
2,906
|
|
|
$
|
2,601
|
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
3,457
|
|
|
|
3,004
|
|
|
|
2,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred extended warranty revenue at end of period
|
|
$
|
6,416
|
|
|
$
|
5,910
|
|
|
$
|
5,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Changes in cost estimates related
to pre-existing warranties are aggregated with accruals for new
standard warranty contracts. Dells warranty liability
process does not differentiate between estimates made for
pre-existing warranties and new warranty obligations.
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Includes the impact of foreign
currency exchange rate fluctuations.
|
88
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 10
SEVERANCE AND FACILITY ACTIONS
During Fiscal 2010 and Fiscal 2009, Dell completed a series of
individual cost reduction and facility exit activities designed
to enhance operating efficiency and to reduce costs. Dell
continued to incur costs related to these activities during
Fiscal 2011. The accruals related to these various cost
reductions and efficiency actions are included in accrued and
other liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Financial
Position.
The following table sets forth the activity related to
Dells severance and facility actions liability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
Actions
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Balance as of February 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
Severance and facility charges to provision
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
Other
adjustments(a)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 30, 2009
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Severance and facility charges to provision
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(333
|
)
|
Other
adjustments(a)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 29, 2010
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
Severance and facility charges to provision
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
Other
adjustments(a)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 28, 2011
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Other adjustments relate primarily
to foreign currency translation adjustments.
|
Severance and facility action charges are composed of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Severance and facility actions
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
336
|
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
Accelerated depreciation and other facility charges
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total severance and facility action costs
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
|
$
|
282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Severance and facility action charges are included in cost of
net revenue, selling, general and administrative expenses, and
research, development, and engineering in the Consolidated
Statement of Income as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Severance and facility action costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of net revenue
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
236
|
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
Research, development, and engineering
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
|
$
|
282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 11
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Lease Commitments Dell leases property
and equipment, manufacturing facilities, and office space under
non-cancelable leases. Certain of these leases obligate Dell to
pay taxes, maintenance, and repair costs. At January 28,
2011, future minimum lease payments under these non-cancelable
leases are as follows: $106 million in Fiscal 2012;
$71 million in Fiscal 2013; $53 million in Fiscal
2014; $44 million in Fiscal 2015; $33 million in
Fiscal 2016; and $68 million thereafter.
Rent expense under all leases totaled $87 million,
$93 million, and $116 million for Fiscal 2011, Fiscal
2010, and Fiscal 2009, respectively.
Purchase Obligations Dell has
contractual obligations to purchase goods or services, which
specify significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities
to be purchased; fixed, minimum, or variable price provisions;
and the approximate timing of the transaction. As of
January 28, 2011, Dell has $293 million,
$43 million, and $29 million in purchase obligations
for Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2013, and Fiscal 2014 and thereafter,
respectively.
Restricted Cash As of January 28,
2011, and January 29, 2010, Dell had restricted cash in the
amounts of $25 million and $147 million, respectively,
included in other current assets on the Consolidated Statements
of Financial Position. The balance at January 29, 2010, was
primarily related to an agreement between DFS and CIT, which
required Dell to maintain an escrow cash account that was held
as recourse reserves for credit losses, performance fee deposits
related to Dells private label credit card, as well as
amounts maintained in escrow accounts related to Dells
acquisitions. In the third quarter of Fiscal 2011, the agreement
between DFS and CIT was terminated and the restricted cash that
was held on deposit was returned to CIT. The balance at
January 28, 2011, primarily relates to various escrow
accounts in connection with Dells acquisitions.
Legal Matters Dell is involved in
various claims, suits, assessments, investigations, and legal
proceedings that arise from
time-to-time
in the ordinary course of its business, including those
identified below, consisting of matters involving consumer,
antitrust, tax, intellectual property, and other issues on a
global basis.
The following is a discussion of Dells significant
on-going legal matters and other proceedings:
SEC Investigation and Related Settlements In
August 2005, the SEC initiated an inquiry into certain of
Dells accounting and financial reporting matters and
requested that Dell provide certain documents. The SEC expanded
that inquiry in June 2006 and entered a formal order of
investigation in October 2006. In August 2006, because
of potential issues identified in the course of responding to
the SECs requests for information, Dells Audit
Committee, on the recommendation of management and in
consultation with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Dells
independent registered public accounting firm, initiated an
independent investigation into certain accounting and financial
reporting matters, which was completed in the third quarter
90
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
of Fiscal 2008. Dell subsequently restated its annual and
interim financial statements for Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2004,
Fiscal 2005, Fiscal 2006, and the first quarter of Fiscal 2007.
On July 22, 2010, Dell reached a settlement with the SEC
resolving the SECs investigation into Dells
disclosures and alleged omissions prior to Fiscal 2008 regarding
certain aspects of its commercial relationship with Intel
Corporation (Intel) and into separate accounting and
financial reporting matters. The SEC agreed to settlements with
both the company and Michael Dell, who serves as the
companys Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The company
and Mr. Dell entered into the settlements without admitting
or denying the allegations in the SECs complaint, as is
consistent with common SEC practice.
Under its settlement, the company consented to a permanent
injunction against future violations of antifraud provisions,
non-scienter (negligence) based fraud provisions and other
non-fraud based provisions related to reporting, the maintenance
of accurate books and records, and internal accounting controls
under Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the
Securities Act), Sections 10(b), 13(a),
13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the Exchange Act) and
Rules 10b-5,
12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 under the Exchange Act. The company
also agreed to perform, and has initiated, certain undertakings,
including retaining and working with an independent consultant,
to enhance its disclosure processes, practices and controls.
Pursuant to the settlement terms, the company expects to have
completed or implemented these undertakings within
36 months after court approval of the settlement on
October 13, 2010. In addition, the company paid into an
escrow account a civil monetary penalty of $100 million and
discharged the liability during the second quarter of Fiscal
2011.
The SECs allegations with respect to Mr. Dell and his
settlement were limited to the alleged failure to provide
adequate disclosures with respect to the companys
commercial relationship with Intel prior to Fiscal 2008.
Mr. Dells settlement did not involve any of the
separate accounting fraud charges that were settled by the
company. Moreover, Mr. Dells settlement was limited
to claims in which only negligence, and not fraudulent intent,
is required to establish liability, as well as secondary
liability claims for other non-fraud charges. Under his
settlement, Mr. Dell consented to a permanent injunction
against future violations of these negligence-based provisions
and other non-fraud based provisions related to periodic
reporting. Specifically, Mr. Dell consented to be enjoined
from violating Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) of the
Securities Act and
Rule 13a-14
under the Exchange Act and from aiding and abetting violations
of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and
Rules 12b-20,
13a-1 and 13a-13 under the Exchange Act. In addition,
Mr. Dell agreed to a civil monetary penalty of
$4 million. The settlement does not include any
restrictions on Mr. Dells continued service as an
officer or director of the company.
The independent directors of the Board of Directors unanimously
determined that it is in the best interests of Dell and its
stockholders that Mr. Dell continue to serve as the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the company.
The settlements with the company and Mr. Dell were approved
by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on
October 13, 2010.
Securities Litigation Four putative
securities class actions filed between September 13, 2006,
and January 31, 2007, in the U.S. District Court for the
Western District of Texas, Austin Division, against Dell and
certain of its current and former directors and officers were
consolidated as In re Dell Securities Litigation, and a lead
plaintiff was appointed by the court. The lead plaintiff
asserted claims under Sections 10(b), 20(a), and 20A of the
Exchange Act based on alleged false and misleading disclosures
or omissions regarding Dells financial statements,
governmental investigations, internal controls, known battery
problems and business model, and based on insiders sales
of Dell securities. This action also included Dells
independent registered public accounting firm,
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, as a defendant. On October 6,
2008, the court dismissed all of the plaintiffs claims
with prejudice and without leave to amend. On November 3,
2008, the plaintiff appealed the dismissal of Dell and the
officer defendants to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. The
appeal was
91
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
fully briefed, and oral argument on the appeal was heard by the
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on September 1, 2009. On
November 20, 2009, the parties to the appeal entered into a
written settlement agreement whereby Dell would pay
$40 million to the proposed class and the plaintiff would
dismiss the pending litigation. The settlement was preliminarily
approved by the District Court on December 21, 2009. The
settlement was subject to certain conditions, including opt-outs
from the proposed class not exceeding a specified percentage and
final approval by the District Court. During the first quarter
of Fiscal 2011, the original opt-out period in the notice
approved by the District Court expired without the specified
percentage being exceeded. The District Court subsequently
granted final approval for the settlement and entered a final
judgment on July 20, 2010. Dell paid $40 million into
an escrow account to satisfy this settlement and discharged the
liability during the second quarter of Fiscal 2011. Certain
objectors to the settlement have filed notices of appeal to the
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals with regard to approval of the
settlement. While there can be no assurances with respect to
litigation, we believe it is unlikely that the settlement will
be overturned on appeal.
Copyright Levies In many European Union
(EU) member countries, there are requirements to
collect and remit levies to collecting societies based on sales
of certain devices. These levies apply to Dell and others in the
industry. The amount of levies is generally based upon the
number of products sold and the per-product amounts of the
levies. Levies are intended to compensate copyright holders for
fair use copying of copyrighted materials. The
collecting societies then distribute the levies to copyright
holders. Some EU member countries that do not yet have levies on
digital devices are expected to implement similar legislation to
enable them to extend existing levy schemes, while some other EU
member countries are expected to limit the scope of levy schemes
and their applicability in the digital hardware environment.
Dell, other companies and various industry associations have
opposed the extension of levies to the digital environment and
have advocated alternative models of compensation to rights
holders. As described below, there are multiple proceedings
involving Dell or its competitors in certain EU member
countries, where plaintiffs are seeking to impose or modify
levies upon equipment (such as multifunction devices, phones,
personal computers (PCs) and printers), alleging
that these devices enable copying of copyrighted materials. Even
if Dell is not a party to all these proceedings, however, the
decisions could impact Dells business and the amount of
copyright levies Dell may be required to collect. These various
proceeding also challenge whether the levy schemes in those
countries comply with EU law.
There are multiple proceedings in Germany that could impact
Dells obligation to collect and remit levies in Germany.
In July 2004, VG Wort, a German collecting society, filed a
lawsuit against Hewlett-Packard Company (HP) in the
Stuttgart Civil Court seeking copyright levies on printers. On
December 22, 2004, the court held that HP was liable for
payments regarding all printers using ASCII code sold in
Germany. HP appealed the decision and after an intermediary
ruling upholding the trial courts decision, the German
Federal Supreme Court (GFSC) in December 2007
issued a judgment that printers are not subject to levies under
the German copyright law that was in effect until
December 31, 2007. Based upon the GFSCs ruling, Dell
concluded there was no obligation for Dell to collect or accrue
levies for printers sold by it prior to December 31, 2007.
VG Wort filed a claim with the German Constitutional Court
(GCC) challenging the GFSCs ruling that
printers are not subject to levies. On September 21, 2010,
the GCC revoked the GFSC decision and referred the case back to
the GFSC to determine if the ruling gave due credit to the
copyright owners property rights under the German
Constitution and whether the GFSC should have referred the case
to the European Court of Justice (ECJ). The GFSC has
set a hearing date of March 24, 2011. Dell believes that
the GFSC can decide to refer the case to the ECJ, confirm its
prior decision, or conclude that printers are subject to levies
under German law. Dell has not accrued any liability in this
matter, as Dell does not believe there is a probable and
estimable claim.
In a separate matter, on December 29, 2005, Zentralstelle
Für private Überspielungrechte (ZPÜ),
a joint association of various German collecting societies,
instituted arbitration proceedings against Dells German
subsidiary before the Board of Arbitration at the German Patent
and Trademark Office (Arbitration Body) in Munich.
ZPÜ claimed an audio-video levy of 18.42 for each PC
sold by Dell in Germany from January 1,
92
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2002, through December 31, 2005. On July 31, 2007, the
Arbitration Body recommended a levy of 15 on each PC sold
by Dell during that period for audio and visual copying
capabilities. Dell and ZPÜ rejected the recommendation, and
on February 21, 2008, ZPÜ filed a lawsuit in the
German Regional Court in Munich with respect to levies to be
paid through the end of calendar year 2007. On December 23,
2009, ZPÜ and the German industry association, BCH, reached
a settlement regarding audio-video copyright levy litigation.
The settlement provided for payment of levies in the amount of
3.15 for calendar years 2002 and 2003, 6.30 for
calendar years 2004 through 2007, and 12.15 (for units
excluding a burner) and 13.65 (for units including a
burner) for calendar years 2008 through 2010. Dell joined this
settlement on February 23, 2010 and has paid the amounts
due thereunder. Because the settlement agreement expired on
December 31, 2010, the amount of levies payable after
calendar year 2010, as well as Dells ability to recover
such amounts through increased prices, remains uncertain.
Additionally, there are proceedings in Spain to which Dell is
not a party, but that could impact Dells obligation to
collect and remit levies across the EU. In March 2006,
Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de Espana
(SGAE), a Spanish collecting society, sued Padawan
SL, a company unaffiliated with Dell, in the Commercial Court
number four of Barcelona in Spain claiming that Padawan owed
levies on the CD-Rs, CD-RWs, DVD-Rs, and MP3 players sold by
Padawan. In June 2007, the trial court upheld SGAEs
claim and ordered Padawan to pay specified levies. Padawan
appealed the decision to the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona,
which stayed the proceedings in order to refer the case to the
ECJ. The ECJ considered the interpretation of the term
fair compensation under the European Copyright
Directive (Directive). On October 21, 2010, the
ECJ issued its decision and outlined how fair compensation
should be considered under the Directive by the EU member
states. The ECJ stated that fair compensation must be calculated
based on the harm caused to the authors of protected works by
private copying. The ECJ also stated that the indiscriminate
application of the private copying levy to devices not made
available to private users and clearly reserved for uses other
than private copying is incompatible with the Directive. The
matter has been referred back to the Spanish court to determine
whether the Spanish copyright levy scheme is compatible with the
Directive based on the guidance provided by the ECJ. It is
unclear at this time what the effect of this decision will be on
copyright levies in Spain and the other EU member states. Dell
continues to collect and remit levies in Spain and other EU
countries where it has determined that based on local law it is
probable that Dell has an obligation.
The ultimate resolution of these matters and the associated
financial impact to Dell, if any, including the number of units
potentially affected, the amount of levies imposed, and the
ability of Dell to recover such amounts remains uncertain at
this time. Should the courts determine there is liability for
previous units shipped beyond what Dell has collected or
accrued, Dell would be liable for such incremental amounts.
Recovery would only be possible on future collections related to
future shipments.
Sharp Corporation v Dell Inc. Sharp
Corporation (Sharp) filed a suit against Dell in
October 2008 for trademark infringement, unfair competition
and dilution in the U.S. District Court in the State of New
Jersey. Sharp alleges that it is the owner of the
SHARP mark and that this mark and related marks are
used in connection with Sharps sale of a wide variety of
electrical and consumer electronic products. Sharp alleges that
Dell has infringed the SHARP mark by using the
UltraSharp and Dell UltraSharp marks to
promote, advertise and sell computer monitors and notebook
computers, from 2002 to the present. Sharp alleges that
Dells use of UltraSharp has and will continue
to cause actual consumer confusion regarding the source of
UltraSharp. In addition, Sharp has asserted a claim
for dilution of its SHARP marks on the alleged ground that
Dells use of DELL UltraSharp and UltraSharp has weakened
the distinctive value of its marks. Sharp seeks damages measured
by Dells profits made from the sale of DELL UltraSharp
products, treble damages, punitive damages, costs and
attorneys fees. Sharp also seeks a permanent injunction
precluding the use of Dells allegedly infringing
UltraSharp mark. Dell disputes the claims and is
vigorously defending the case. Trial in this matter is currently
scheduled for June 2011. The ultimate resolution of this
matter and the associated financial impact to Dell, if any,
remains uncertain at this time.
93
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Chad Brazil and Steven Seick v Dell Inc. Chad
Brazil and Steven Seick filed a class action suit against Dell
in March 2007 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of California. The plaintiffs allege that Dell
advertised discounts on its products from false
regular prices, in violation of California law. The
plaintiffs seek compensatory damages, disgorgement of profits
from the alleged false advertising, injunctive relief, punitive
damages and attorneys fees. In December 2010, the
District Court certified a class consisting of all California
residents who had purchased certain products advertised with a
former sales price on the consumer segment of Dells
website during an approximately four year period between
March 2003 and June 2007. The Court of Appeals is
currently considering Dells request for an interlocutory
appeal of the certification order. Dell disputes the claims and
is vigorously defending the case. The ultimate resolution of
this matter and the associated financial impact to Dell, if any,
remain uncertain at this time.
Other Litigation The various legal
proceedings in which Dell is involved include commercial
litigation and a variety of patent suits. In some of these
cases, Dell is the sole defendant. More often, particularly in
the patent suits, Dell is one of a number of defendants in the
electronics and technology industries. Dell is actively
defending a number of patent infringement suits, and several
pending claims are in various stages of evaluations. While the
number of patent cases has grown over time, Dell does not
currently anticipate that any of these matters will have a
material impact on Dells financial condition , results of
operations, or cash flows.
Other Matters In the second quarter of Fiscal
2011, Dell became aware of instances in which certain peripheral
product sales made to U.S. federal government customers under
Dells General Services Administration (GSA)
Schedule 70 Contract were not compliant with contract
requirements implementing the Trade Agreements Act. Dell
self-reported the discovery to the GSAs Office of the
Inspector General and has presented a report of its findings
which conclude that less than $1 million of non-compliant
products may have been sold. Dell continues to work with the
GSAs Office of the Inspector General to reach final
resolution of this matter with that office .
While Dell does not expect that the ultimate outcomes in these
proceedings or matters, individually or collectively, will have
a material adverse effect on its business, financial position,
results of operations, or cash flows, the results and timing of
the ultimate resolutions of these various proceedings and
matters are inherently unpredictable. Whether the outcome of any
claim, suit, assessment, investigation, or legal proceeding,
individually or collectively, could have a material effect on
Dells business, financial condition, results of
operations, or cash flows will depend on a number of variables,
including the nature, timing, and amount of any associated
expenses, amounts paid in settlement, damages or other remedies
or consequences. Dell accrues a liability when it believes that
it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and that
it can reasonably estimate the amount of the loss. Dell reviews
these accruals at least quarterly and adjusts them to reflect
ongoing negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal
counsel, and other relevant information. To the extent new
information is obtained and Dells views on the probable
outcomes of claims, suits, assessments, investigations, or legal
proceedings change, changes in Dells accrued liabilities
would be recorded in the period in which such determination is
made.
Certain Concentrations Dells
counterparties to its financial instruments consist of a number
of major financial institutions with credit ratings of AA and A
by major credit rating agencies. In addition to limiting the
amount of agreements and contracts it enters into with any one
party, Dell monitors its positions with, and the credit quality
of the counterparties to, these financial instruments. Dell does
not anticipate nonperformance by any of the counterparties.
Dells investments in debt securities are in high quality
financial institutions and companies. As part of its cash and
risk management processes, Dell performs periodic evaluations of
the credit standing of the institutions in accordance with its
investment policy. Dells investments in debt securities
have effective maturities of less than five years. Management
believes that no significant concentration of credit risk for
investments exists for Dell.
94
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of January 28, 2011, Dell does not have significant
concentrations of cash and cash equivalent deposits with its
financial institutions.
Dell markets and sells its products and services to large
corporate clients, governments, health care and education
accounts, as well as small and medium-sized businesses and
individuals. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of
Dells consolidated net revenue during Fiscal 2011, Fiscal
2010, or Fiscal 2009.
Dell purchases a number of components from single or limited
sources. In some cases, alternative sources of supply are not
available. In other cases, Dell may establish a working
relationship with a single source or a limited number of sources
if Dell believes it is advantageous to do so based on
performance, quality, support, delivery, capacity, or price
considerations.
Dell also sells components to certain contract manufacturers who
assemble final products for Dell. Dell does not recognize the
sale of these components in net sales and does not recognize the
related profits until the final products are sold by Dell to end
users. Profits from the sale of these parts are recognized as a
reduction of cost of sales at the time of sale. Dell has net
settlement agreements with the majority of these contract
manufacturers that allow Dell to offset the accounts payable to
the contract manufacturers from the amounts receivable from
them. The net balances that are receivables for Dell are
included in other current assets or accounts payable if Dell is
in a net payable position. Non-trade receivables from four of
these contract manufacturers accounted for the majority of gross
non-trade receivables of $2.7 billion and $2.5 billion
as of January 28, 2011 and January 29, 2010,
respectively. As of January 28, 2011, and January 29,
2010, these four contract manufacturers were in net payable
positions.
NOTE 12
INCOME AND OTHER TAXES
The provision for income taxes consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
597
|
|
|
$
|
491
|
|
|
$
|
446
|
|
State/Local
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
State/Local
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
715
|
|
|
$
|
591
|
|
|
$
|
846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes included approximately
$2.8 billion, $1.8 billion, and $2.7 billion
related to foreign operations in Fiscal 2011, Fiscal 2010, and
Fiscal 2009, respectively.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated tax impact
of temporary differences between the tax and book basis of
assets and liabilities are recognized based on the enacted
statutory tax rates for the year in which Dell expects the
differences to reverse. A valuation allowance is established
against a deferred tax asset when it is more likely than not
that the asset or any portion thereof will not be realized.
Based upon all the available evidence,
95
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
including expectation of future taxable income, Dell has
provided a valuation allowance of $48 million and
$41 million for Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010, respectively,
related to state income credit carryforwards. Dell has provided
a valuation allowance of $20 million and $22 million
related to net operating losses for Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010,
respectively. Additionally, for Fiscal 2011, a $4 million
valuation allowance has been provided against other deferred tax
assets. Dell has determined that it will be able to realize the
remainder of its deferred tax assets.
The components of Dells net deferred tax assets are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
$
|
369
|
|
|
$
|
499
|
|
Warranty provisions
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
Provisions for product returns and doubtful accounts
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Leasing and financing
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
Credit carryforwards
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Loss carryforwards
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Stock-based and deferred compensation
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
Operating and compensation related accruals
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Capitalized intangible assets
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Other
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
|
|
|
1,304
|
|
|
|
1,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
Acquired intangibles
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
|
|
(534
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(671
|
)
|
|
|
(741
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
633
|
|
|
$
|
681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion (included in other current assets)
|
|
$
|
558
|
|
|
$
|
444
|
|
Non-current portion (included in other non-current assets)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
633
|
|
|
$
|
681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During Fiscal 2011, Dell recorded $41 million of deferred
tax assets related to net operating loss and credit
carryforwards acquired during the year, all of which was offset
to goodwill. During Fiscal 2010, Dell recorded $26 million
of deferred tax assets related to acquired net operating loss
and credit carryforwards, net of valuation allowances of
$17 million. The offset for recording the acquired net
operating loss and credit carryforwards was $9 million to
goodwill. During Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010, $21 million
and $20 million, respectively, were recorded to additional
paid in capital related to the utilization of acquired net
operating losses as a result of employee stock option activity,
and is included in net tax shortfall from employee stock plans
on the Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity.
Utilization of the acquired carryforwards is subject to
limitations due to ownership changes that may delay the
utilization of a portion of the acquired carryforwards. No
additional valuation
96
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
allowances have been placed on the acquired net operating loss
and credit carryforwards. The carryforwards for significant
taxing jurisdictions expire beginning in Fiscal 2014.
Deferred taxes have not been recorded on the excess book basis
in the shares of certain foreign subsidiaries because these
basis differences are not expected to reverse in the foreseeable
future and are expected to be permanent in duration. These basis
differences in the amount of approximately $12.3 billion
arose primarily from the undistributed book earnings of
substantially all of the subsidiaries in which Dell intends to
reinvest indefinitely. The basis differences could reverse
through a sale of the subsidiaries or the receipt of dividends
from the subsidiaries, as well as various other events. Net of
available foreign tax credits, residual income tax of
approximately $3.9 billion would be due upon reversal of
this excess book basis as of January 28, 2011.
A portion of Dells operations is subject to a reduced tax
rate or is free of tax under various tax holidays that expire in
whole or in part during Fiscal 2012 through Fiscal 2019. Many of
these tax holidays and reduced tax rates may be extended when
certain conditions are met or may be terminated early if certain
conditions are not met. The income tax benefits attributable to
the tax status of these subsidiaries were estimated to be
approximately $321 million ($.17 per share) in Fiscal 2011,
$149 million ($.08 per share) in Fiscal 2010, and
$338 million ($.17 per share) in Fiscal 2009.
The effective tax rate differed from the statutory U.S. federal
income tax rate as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
U.S. federal statutory rate
|
|
|
35
|
.0%
|
|
|
35
|
.0%
|
|
|
35
|
.0%
|
Foreign income taxed at different rates
|
|
|
(14
|
.7)
|
|
|
(7
|
.6)
|
|
|
(9
|
.7)
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit
|
|
|
1
|
.4
|
|
|
1
|
.4
|
|
|
(0
|
.2)
|
Regulatory settlement
|
|
|
1
|
.0
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(1
|
.4)
|
|
|
0
|
.4
|
|
|
0
|
.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
21
|
.3%
|
|
|
29
|
.2%
|
|
|
25
|
.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Balance at February 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,483
|
|
Increases related to tax positions of the current year
|
|
|
298
|
|
Increases related to tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
19
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
Lapse of statute of limitations
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Audit settlements
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 30, 2009
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
Increases related to tax positions of the current year
|
|
|
298
|
|
Increases related to tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
32
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
Lapse of statute of limitations
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Audit settlements
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 29, 2010
|
|
|
1,793
|
|
Increases related to tax positions of the current year
|
|
|
262
|
|
Increases related to tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
22
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Lapse of statute of limitations
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
Audit settlements
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 28, 2011
|
|
$
|
1,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 reductions for tax positions of prior years in the
table above include $163 million of items that did not
impact Dells effective tax rate for Fiscal 2009. These
items include foreign currency translation, withdrawal of
positions expected to be taken for prior year tax filings, and a
reduction that is included in the deferred tax asset valuation
allowance at January 30, 2009. There were no significant
items of a similar nature in Fiscal 2010 or Fiscal 2011.
The unrecognized tax benefits in the table above do not include
accrued interest and penalties of $552 million,
$507 million, and $400 million as of January 28,
2011, January 29, 2010, and January 30, 2009,
respectively. The interest and penalties are offset by tax
benefits from transfer pricing, interest deductions, and state
income tax, which are also not included in the table above.
These benefits were $242 million, $209 million and
$166 million as of January 28, 2011, January 29,
2010, and January 30, 2009, respectively. The net amount of
$2.3 billion as of January 28, 2011 if recognized,
would favorably affect Dells effective tax rate.
Interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities are
included in income tax expense. Dell recorded $45 million,
$107 million, and $112 million related to interest and
penalties, which were included in income tax expense for Fiscal
2011, Fiscal 2010, and Fiscal 2009, respectively.
Dell is currently under income tax audits in various
jurisdictions, including the United States. The tax periods open
to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which Dell
is subject include fiscal years 1997 through 2011. As a result
of these audits, Dell maintains ongoing discussions and
negotiations relating to tax matters with the taxing authorities
in these various jurisdictions. Dells U.S. federal income
tax returns for fiscal years 2007 through 2009 are currently
under examination by the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS). The IRS issued a Revenue Agents Report
(RAR) for fiscal years 2004 through 2006 proposing
certain assessments primarily related to transfer pricing
matters. Dell disagrees with certain of the proposed assessments
and has contested them through the IRS
98
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
administrative appeals procedures. The IRS has recently remanded
the audit for tax years 2004 through 2006 back to examination
for further review. Dell believes that it has provided adequate
reserves related to all matters contained in tax periods open to
examination. However, should Dell experience an unfavorable
outcome in the IRS matter, such an outcome could have a material
impact on its results of operations, financial position, and
cash flows. Although the timing of income tax audit resolutions
and negotiations with taxing authorities is highly uncertain,
Dell does not anticipate a significant change to the total
amount of unrecognized income tax benefits within the next
12 months.
Dell takes certain non-income tax positions in the jurisdictions
in which it operates and has received certain non-income tax
assessments from various jurisdictions. These jurisdictions
include Brazil, where Dell has been in litigation with a state
government over the proper application of transactional taxes to
warranties and software related to the sale of computers, as
well as over the appropriate use of state statutory incentives
to reduce the transactional taxes. Dell has also negotiated
certain tax incentives with the state that can be used to offset
potential tax liabilities should the courts rule against it. The
incentives are based upon the number of jobs Dell maintains
within the state. Recently, Dell settled two cases related to
warranties and software under a taxpayer amnesty program
utilizing the incentive credits instead of cash to minimize the
impact to its consolidated financial statements. The third
outstanding case, which is on appeal and for which Dell has
pledged its manufacturing facility in Hortolandia, Brazil to the
government, remains pending. Dell does not expect the outcome of
this case to have a material impact to its consolidated
financial statements.
Dell believes its positions in these non-income tax litigation
matters are supportable, that a liability is not probable, and
that it will ultimately prevail. In the normal course of
business, Dells positions and conclusions related to its
non-income taxes could be challenged and assessments may be
made. To the extent new information is obtained and Dells
views on its positions, probable outcomes of assessments, or
litigation change, changes in estimates to Dells accrued
liabilities would be recorded in the period in which such
determination is made.
NOTE 13
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted-average effect
of all common shares issued and outstanding and is calculated by
dividing net income by the weighted-average shares outstanding
during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by
dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common
shares used in the basic earnings per share calculation plus the
number of common shares that would be issued assuming exercise
or conversion of all potentially dilutive common shares
outstanding. Dell excludes equity instruments from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share if the effect of
including such instruments is anti-dilutive. Accordingly,
certain stock-based incentive awards have been excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share totaling
179 million, 220 million, and 252 million shares
for Fiscal 2011, Fiscal 2010, and Fiscal 2009, respectively.
99
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted earnings per share for each of the past three fiscal
years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2,635
|
|
|
$
|
1,433
|
|
|
$
|
2,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,944
|
|
|
|
1,954
|
|
|
|
1,980
|
|
Effect of dilutive options, restricted stock units, restricted
stock, and other
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
|
|
1,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
NOTE 14
CAPITALIZATION
Preferred
Stock
Authorized Shares Dell has the authority to
issue 5 million shares of preferred stock, par value $.01
per share. At January 28, 2011, and January 29, 2010,
no shares of preferred stock were issued or outstanding.
Common
Stock
Authorized Shares At January 28, 2011,
Dell was authorized to issue 7 billion shares of common
stock, par value $.01 per share.
Share Repurchase Program Dell has a share
repurchase program that authorizes it to purchase shares of
common stock in order to increase shareholder value and manage
dilution resulting from shares issued under Dells equity
compensation plans. However, Dell does not currently have a
policy that requires the repurchase of common stock in
conjunction with stock-based payment arrangements. During Fiscal
2011, the amount of shares repurchased was $800 million. At
January 28, 2011, Dells remaining authorized amount
for share repurchases was $3.7 billion.
NOTE 15
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION AND BENEFIT PLANS
Stock-based
Compensation
Description
of the Plans
Employee Stock Plans Dell is currently
issuing stock grants under the Dell Amended and Restated 2002
Long-Term Incentive Plan (the 2002 Incentive Plan),
which was approved by shareholders on December 4, 2007.
There are previous plans that have been terminated, except for
options previously granted under those plans which remain
outstanding. The 2002 Incentive Plan and the previous plans are
all collectively referred to as the Stock Plans.
The 2002 Incentive Plan provides for the granting of stock-based
incentive awards to Dells employees and non-employee
directors. Awards may be incentive stock options within the
meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code,
non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, or restricted
stock units. There were approximately
100
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
344 million, 320 million, and 313 million shares
of Dells common stock available for future grants under
the Stock Plans at January 28, 2011, January 29, 2010,
and January 30, 2009, respectively. To satisfy stock option
exercises and vested restricted stock awards, Dell has a policy
of issuing new shares as opposed to repurchasing shares on the
open market.
Stock Option Agreements The right to purchase
shares pursuant to existing stock option agreements typically
vests pro-rata at each option anniversary date over a three- to
five-year period. The options, which are granted with option
exercise prices equal to the fair market value of Dells
common stock on the date of grant, generally expire within ten
to twelve years from the date of grant. Compensation expense for
stock options is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
requisite services period.
Restricted Stock Awards Awards of restricted
stock may be either grants of restricted stock, restricted stock
units, or performance-based stock units that are issued at no
cost to the recipient. For restricted stock grants, at the date
of grant, the recipient has all rights of a stockholder, subject
to certain restrictions on transferability and a risk of
forfeiture. Restricted stock grants typically vest over a three-
to seven-year period beginning on the date of the grant. For
restricted stock units, legal ownership of the shares is not
transferred to the employee until the unit vests, which is
generally over a three- to five-year period. Dell also grants
performance-based restricted stock units as a long-term
incentive in which an award recipient receives shares contingent
upon Dell achieving performance objectives and the
employees continuing employment through the vesting
period, which is generally over a three- to five-year period.
Compensation costs recorded in connection with these
performance-based restricted stock units are based on
Dells best estimate of the number of shares that will
eventually be issued upon achievement of the specified
performance criteria and when it becomes probable that certain
performance goals will be achieved. The cost of these awards is
determined using the fair market value of Dells common
stock on the date of the grant.
Compensation costs for restricted stock awards with a service
condition is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period. Compensation costs for
performance-based restricted stock awards is recognized on an
accelerated multiple-award approach based on the most probable
outcome of the performance condition.
Acceleration of Vesting of Options On
January 23, 2009, Dells Board of Directors approved
the acceleration of the vesting of unvested
out-of-the-money
stock options (options that have an exercise price greater than
the current market stock price) with exercise prices equal to or
greater than $10.14 per share for approximately 2,800 employees
holding options to purchase approximately 21 million shares
of common stock. Dell concluded the modification to the stated
vesting provisions was substantive after Dell considered the
volatility of its share price and the exercise price of the
amended options in relation to recent share values. Because the
modification was considered substantive, the remaining unearned
compensation expense of $104 million was recorded as an
expense in Fiscal 2009. The weighted-average exercise price of
the options that were accelerated was $21.90.
101
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock
Option Activity
The following table summarizes stock option activity for the
Stock Plans during Fiscal 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Average
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
of
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Price
|
|
Term
|
|
Value
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
(per share)
|
|
(in years)
|
|
(in millions)
|
Options outstanding January 29, 2010
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
30.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
14.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
9.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
13.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/expired
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
36.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding January 28, 2011
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
$
|
26.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest (net of estimated
forfeitures) January 28,
2011(a)
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
$
|
26.73
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
Exercisable January 28,
2011(a)
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
$
|
28.61
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
For options vested and expected to
vest and options exercisable, the aggregate intrinsic value in
the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value
(the difference between Dells closing stock price on
January 28, 2011, and the exercise price multiplied by the
number of
in-the-money
options) that would have been received by the option holders had
the holders exercised their options on January 28, 2011.
The intrinsic value changes based on changes in the fair market
value of Dells common stock.
|
The following table summarizes stock option activity for the
Stock Plans during Fiscal 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Average
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
of
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Price
|
|
Term
|
|
Value
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
(per share)
|
|
(in years)
|
|
(in millions)
|
Options outstanding January 30, 2009
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
$
|
31.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
9.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
14.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/expired
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
35.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding January 29, 2010
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
30.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest (net of estimated
forfeitures) January 29,
2010(a)
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
$
|
30.15
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
Exercisable January 29,
2010(a)
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
$
|
31.16
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
For options vested and expected to
vest and options exercisable, the aggregate intrinsic value in
the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value
(the difference between Dells closing stock price on
January 29, 2010, and the exercise price multiplied by the
number of
in-the-money
options) that would have been received by the option holders had
the holders exercised their options on January 29, 2010.
The intrinsic value changes based on changes in the fair market
value of Dells common stock.
|
102
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes stock option activity for the
Stock Plans during Fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Average
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
of
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Price
|
|
Term
|
|
Value
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
(per share)
|
|
(in years)
|
|
(in millions)
|
Options outstanding February 1, 2008
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
32.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
19.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
19.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
23.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/expired
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
33.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding January 30, 2009
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
$
|
31.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest (net of estimated
forfeitures) January 30,
2009(a)(b)
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
$
|
31.86
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Exercisable January 30,
2009(a)(b)
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
$
|
31.86
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
For options vested and expected to
vest and options exercisable, the aggregate intrinsic value in
the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value
(the difference between Dells closing stock price on
January 30, 2009, and the exercise price multiplied by the
number of
in-the-money
options) that would have been received by the option holders had
the holders exercised their options on January 30, 2009.
The intrinsic value changes based on changes in the fair market
value of Dells common stock.
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
No options were
in-the-money
at January 30, 2009
|
Other information pertaining to stock options for the Stock
Plans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions, except per option data)
|
Weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options
granted per option
|
|
$
|
5.01
|
|
|
$
|
3.71
|
|
|
$
|
5.87
|
|
Total fair value of options
vested(a)
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
Total intrinsic value of options
exercised(b)
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Includes the $104 million of
charges for accelerated options in Fiscal 2009.
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
The total intrinsic value of
options exercised represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value
(the difference between the stock price at exercise and the
exercise price multiplied by the number of options exercised)
that was received by the option holders who exercised their
options during the fiscal year.
|
At January 28, 2011, January 29, 2010, and
January 30, 2009, there was $65 million,
$28 million, and $1 million of total unrecognized
stock-based compensation expense related to stock options
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
2.0 years, 2.2 years, and 2.3 years, respectively.
Valuation
of Stock Options
Dell uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the
fair value of stock options at grant date. The estimated fair
values incorporate various assumptions, including volatility,
expected term, and risk-free interest rates. Expected volatility
is based on a blend of implied and historical volatility of
Dells common stock over the most recent period
commensurate with the estimated expected term of Dells
stock options. Dell uses this blend of implied and historical
volatility, as well as other economic data, because management
believes such volatility is more representative of prospective
trends. The expected term of an award is based on historical
experience and on
103
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the terms and conditions of the stock awards granted to
employees. The dividend yield of zero is based on the fact that
Dell has never paid cash dividends and has no present intention
to pay cash dividends.
The weighted-average fair value of stock options was determined
based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model weighted for all
grants utilizing the assumptions in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Risk-free interest rate (U.S. Government Treasury Note)
|
|
|
2.2%
|
|
|
|
1.8%
|
|
|
|
2.3%
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
37%
|
|
|
|
44%
|
|
|
|
37%
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
-%
|
|
|
|
-%
|
|
|
|
-%
|
|
Restricted
Stock Awards
Non-vested restricted stock awards and activities were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Average
|
|
Number
|
|
Average
|
|
Number
|
|
Average
|
|
|
of
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
of
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
of
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Shares
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Shares
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
(per share)
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
(per share)
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
(per share)
|
Non-vested restricted stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
16.84
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
22.45
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
24.90
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
14.53
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
11.39
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
19.11
|
|
Vested(a)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
19.10
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
22.78
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
24.64
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
15.21
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
18.23
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
23.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested restricted stock ending balance
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
14.71
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
16.84
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
22.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Upon vesting, restricted stock
units are generally sold to cover the required withholding
taxes. However, select participants may choose the net shares
settlement method to cover withholding tax requirements. Total
shares withheld were approximately 354,000, 157,000, and 48,000
for Fiscal 2011, Fiscal 2010, and Fiscal 2009, respectively.
Total payments for the employees tax obligations to the
taxing authorities were $5 million, $2 million, and
$1 million in Fiscal 2011, Fiscal 2010, and Fiscal 2009,
respectively, and are reflected as a financing activity within
the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
|
For the Fiscal 2011, Fiscal 2010, and Fiscal 2009, total
estimated vest date fair value of restricted stock awards was
$250 million, $134 million, and $197 million.
At January 28, 2011, January 29, 2010, and
January 30, 2009, there was $341 million,
$393 million, and $507 million, respectively, of
unrecognized stock-based compensation expense, net of estimated
forfeitures, related to non-vested restricted stock awards.
These awards are expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of approximately 1.9, 1.8, and
2.0 years, respectively.
104
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock-based
Compensation Expense
Stock-based compensation expense was allocated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Stock-based compensation expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of net revenue
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense before taxes
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
235
|
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation in the table above includes
$104 million of expense for accelerated options and a
reduction of $1 million for the release of the accrual for
expired stock options in Fiscal 2009, as previously discussed.
Employee
Benefit Plans
401(k) Plan Dell has a defined contribution
retirement plan (the 401(k) Plan) that complies with
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Substantially
all employees in the U.S. are eligible to participate in the
401(k) Plan. Effective January 1, 2008, Dell matches 100%
of each participants voluntary contributions, subject to a
maximum contribution of 5% of the participants
compensation, and participants vest immediately in all Dell
contributions to the 401(k) Plan. Dells contributions
during Fiscal 2011, Fiscal 2010, and Fiscal 2009 were
$132 million, $91 million, and $93 million,
respectively. Dells contributions are invested according
to each participants elections in the investment options
provided under the Plan. Investment options include Dell common
stock, but neither participant nor Dell contributions are
required to be invested in Dell common stock. During Fiscal
2010, Dell also contributed $4.2 million to Perot
Systems 401(k) Plan (the Perot Plan) after the
acquisition of the company on November 3, 2009. The Perot
Plan was merged into the 401(k) Plan during Fiscal 2011.
Deferred Compensation Plan Dell has a
non-qualified deferred compensation plan (the Deferred
Compensation Plan) for the benefit of certain management
employees and non-employee directors. The Deferred Compensation
Plan permits the deferral of base salary and annual incentive
bonus. The deferrals are held in a separate trust, which has
been established by Dell to administer the Plan. The assets of
the trust are subject to the claims of Dells creditors in
the event that Dell becomes insolvent. Consequently, the trust
qualifies as a grantor trust for income tax purposes (known as a
Rabbi Trust). In accordance with the accounting
provisions for deferred compensation arrangements where amounts
earned are held in a Rabbi Trust and invested, the assets and
liabilities of the Deferred Compensation Plan are presented in
long-term investments and accrued and other liabilities in the
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, respectively. The
assets held by the trust are classified as trading securities
with changes recorded to interest and other, net. These assets
were valued at $99 million at January 28, 2011, and
are disclosed in Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements. Changes in the deferred compensation liability are
recorded to compensation expense.
NOTE 16
SEGMENT INFORMATION
Dells four global business segments are Large Enterprise,
Public, Small and Medium Business (SMB), and
Consumer. Large Enterprise includes sales of IT infrastructure
and service solutions to large global and national corporate
customers. Public includes sales to educational institutions,
governments, health care organizations, and
105
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
law enforcement agencies, among others. SMB includes sales of
complete IT solutions to small and medium-sized businesses.
Consumer includes sales to individual consumers and retailers
around the world.
The business segments disclosed in the accompanying Consolidated
Financial Statements are based on this organizational structure
and information reviewed by Dells management to evaluate
the business segment results. Dells measure of segment
operating income for management reporting purposes excludes
severance and facility closure expenses, broad based long-term
incentives, acquisition-related charges, and amortization of
intangibles.
The following table presents net revenue by Dells
reportable global segments as well as a reconciliation of
consolidated segment operating income to Dells
consolidated operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Enterprise
|
|
$
|
17,813
|
|
|
$
|
14,285
|
|
|
$
|
18,011
|
|
Public
|
|
|
16,851
|
|
|
|
14,484
|
|
|
|
15,338
|
|
Small and Medium Business
|
|
|
14,473
|
|
|
|
12,079
|
|
|
|
14,892
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
12,357
|
|
|
|
12,054
|
|
|
|
12,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
61,494
|
|
|
$
|
52,902
|
|
|
$
|
61,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Enterprise
|
|
$
|
1,473
|
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
|
$
|
1,158
|
|
Public
|
|
|
1,484
|
|
|
|
1,361
|
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
Small and Medium Business
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated segment operating income
|
|
|
4,499
|
|
|
|
3,327
|
|
|
|
3,995
|
|
Severance and facility actions
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
(282
|
)
|
Broad based long-term
incentives(a)
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
|
|
(418
|
)
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
Acquisition-related
costs(a)(b)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other(c)
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,433
|
|
|
$
|
2,172
|
|
|
$
|
3,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Broad based long-term incentives
includes stock-based compensation, but excludes stock-based
compensation related to acquisitions, which are included in
acquisition-related costs. Stock-based expense for Fiscal 2009
also includes $104 million of expense for accelerated
options. See Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information.
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Acquisition-related costs consist
primarily of retention payments, integration costs, and
consulting fees.
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
Other includes the
$100 million settlement for the SEC investigation and a
$40 million settlement for a securities litigation lawsuit
that were both incurred in the first quarter of Fiscal 2011.
|
106
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents assets by Dells reportable
global segments. Segment assets primarily consist of accounts
receivable and inventories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Total assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
$
|
30,264
|
|
|
$
|
26,240
|
|
Large Enterprise
|
|
|
2,934
|
|
|
|
2,604
|
|
Public
|
|
|
2,545
|
|
|
|
2,464
|
|
Small and Medium Business
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
1,458
|
|
|
|
1,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
38,599
|
|
|
$
|
33,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents depreciation expense by Dells
reportable business segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Depreciation expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Enterprise
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
Public
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
Small and Medium Business
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
621
|
|
|
$
|
647
|
|
|
$
|
666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables present net revenue and long-lived asset
information allocated between the U.S. and foreign countries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
31,912
|
|
|
$
|
28,053
|
|
|
$
|
31,569
|
|
Foreign countries
|
|
|
29,582
|
|
|
|
24,849
|
|
|
|
29,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
61,494
|
|
|
$
|
52,902
|
|
|
$
|
61,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Long-lived assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
1,419
|
|
|
$
|
1,536
|
|
Foreign countries
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,953
|
|
|
$
|
2,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The allocation between domestic and foreign net revenue is based
on the location of the customers. Net revenue and long-lived
assets from any single foreign country did not constitute more
than 10% of Dells consolidated net revenues or long-lived
assets during Fiscal 2011, Fiscal 2010, or Fiscal 2009. No
single customer accounted for more than 10% of Dells
consolidated net revenue during Fiscal 2011, Fiscal 2010, or
Fiscal 2009.
The following table presents net revenue by product and services
categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Solutions and Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Solutions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servers and networking
|
|
$
|
7,609
|
|
|
$
|
6,032
|
|
|
$
|
6,512
|
|
Storage
|
|
|
2,295
|
|
|
|
2,192
|
|
|
|
2,667
|
|
Services
|
|
|
7,673
|
|
|
|
5,622
|
|
|
|
5,351
|
|
Software and peripherals
|
|
|
10,261
|
|
|
|
9,499
|
|
|
|
10,603
|
|
Client:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobility
|
|
|
18,971
|
|
|
|
16,610
|
|
|
|
18,604
|
|
Desktop PCs
|
|
|
14,685
|
|
|
|
12,947
|
|
|
|
17,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
61,494
|
|
|
$
|
52,902
|
|
|
$
|
61,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 17
SUPPLEMENTAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Supplemental
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
Information
The following table provides information on amounts included in
accounts receivable, net, and inventories, net , property,
plant, and equipment, net , accrued and other liabilities, and
other non-current liabilities, as well as prepaid expenses as of
January 28, 2011 and January 29, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Accounts receivable, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
6,589
|
|
|
$
|
5,952
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,493
|
|
|
$
|
5,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production materials
|
|
$
|
593
|
|
|
$
|
487
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,301
|
|
|
$
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid
expenses(a)
|
|
$
|
374
|
|
|
$
|
539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
$
|
2,275
|
|
|
$
|
2,118
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
1,674
|
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
Machinery and other equipment
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant, and equipment
|
|
|
4,729
|
|
|
|
4,652
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(2,776
|
)
|
|
|
(2,471
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,953
|
|
|
$
|
2,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Prepaid expenses are included in
other current assets in the Consolidated Statements of Financial
Position.
|
109
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Supplemental Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
Information (cont.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Accrued and other current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
$
|
1,550
|
|
|
$
|
1,112
|
|
Warranty liability
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
Income and other taxes
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,527
|
|
|
|
1,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,181
|
|
|
$
|
3,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty liability
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
|
$
|
319
|
|
Income and other taxes
|
|
|
2,293
|
|
|
|
2,085
|
|
Other
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,686
|
|
|
$
|
2,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Consolidated Statements of Income
The table below provides advertising costs for Fiscal 2011,
Fiscal 2010, and Fiscal 2009. Advertising costs are included in
selling, general, and administrative in the Consolidated
Statements of Income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Advertising costs
|
|
$
|
730
|
|
|
$
|
619
|
|
|
$
|
811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below provides details of interest and other, net for
Fiscal 2011, Fiscal 2010, and Fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Interest and other, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income, primarily interest
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
Gains (losses) on investments, net
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
115
|
|
Other
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other, net
|
|
$
|
(83
|
)
|
|
$
|
(148
|
)
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Supplemental
Statement of Stockholders Equity
The table below provides the cumulative balance for foreign
currency translation adjustments as of January 28, 2011,
January 29, 2010, and January 30, 2009. Cumulative
foreign currency translation adjustments are included as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in
stockholders equity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Cumulative income (loss) for foreign currency translation
adjustments
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation
and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
Income
|
|
Charged to
|
|
at End of
|
Year
|
|
Description
|
|
of Period
|
|
Statement
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Period
|
Trade Receivables:
|
2011
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
2010
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
185
|
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
2009
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
Customer Financing
Receivables(a):
|
2011
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
|
$
|
258
|
|
|
$
|
254
|
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
2010
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
244
|
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
2009
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
159
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
Trade Receivables:
|
2011
|
|
Allowance for customer returns
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
581
|
|
|
$
|
558
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
2010
|
|
Allowance for customer returns
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
541
|
|
|
$
|
531
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
2009
|
|
Allowance for customer returns
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
423
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Charge-offs to the allowance for
financing receivable losses for customer financing receivables
includes principal and interest.
|
111
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 18
UNAUDITED QUARTERLY RESULTS
The following tables present selected unaudited Consolidated
Statements of Income for each quarter of Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2011
|
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share data)
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
14,874
|
|
|
$
|
15,534
|
|
|
$
|
15,394
|
|
|
$
|
15,692
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
2,516
|
|
|
$
|
2,586
|
|
|
$
|
3,003
|
|
|
$
|
3,291
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
$
|
545
|
|
|
$
|
822
|
|
|
$
|
927
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,961
|
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
|
|
1,939
|
|
|
|
1,924
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,973
|
|
|
|
1,960
|
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2010
|
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share data)
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
12,342
|
|
|
$
|
12,764
|
|
|
$
|
12,896
|
|
|
$
|
14,900
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
2,168
|
|
|
$
|
2,391
|
|
|
$
|
2,233
|
|
|
$
|
2,469
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
290
|
|
|
$
|
472
|
|
|
$
|
337
|
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
|
1,956
|
|
|
|
1,957
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
|
|
1,960
|
|
|
|
1,966
|
|
|
|
1,971
|
|
NOTE 19
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In February, 2011, Dell completed its acquisitions of Compellent
Technologies, Inc. (Compellent), a provider of
virtual storage solutions for enterprise and cloud computing
environments, and SecureWorks Inc. (SecureWorks), a
global provider of information security service, for
approximately $938 million and $612 million,
respectively. Both Compellent and SecureWorks will be integrated
into Dells Commercial segments. Because the acquisitions
have recently closed, Dell has not completed the purchase
accounting and initial purchase price allocation for these
acquisitions. Dell expects to complete the purchase accounting
and initial purchase price allocations in the first quarter of
Fiscal 2012.
112
ITEM 9
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Report include the
certifications of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer required by
Rule 13a-14
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act). This Item 9A includes information concerning
the controls and control evaluations referred to in those
certifications.
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management, under the supervision of the Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting. Internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15d(f) under the Exchange Act) is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Internal control
over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures
which (a) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of assets, (b) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary
to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
GAAP, (c) provide reasonable assurance that receipts and
expenditures are being made only in accordance with appropriate
authorization of management and the board of directors, and
(d) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
In connection with the preparation of this Report, our
management, under the supervision and with the participation of
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of January 28, 2011
based on the criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. As a result of that evaluation, management has
concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of January 28, 2011. The effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of January 28,
2011 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their report, which is included in
Part II Item 8 Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Dells management, with the participation of Dells
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has
evaluated whether any change in Dells internal control
over financial reporting occurred during the fourth quarter of
Fiscal 2011. Based on their evaluation, management concluded
that there has been no change in Dells internal control
over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of Fiscal
2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, Dells internal control over financial
reporting.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or
submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in
SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosures.
In connection with the preparation of this report, our
management, under the supervision and with the participation of
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of
January 28, 2011. Based on that evaluation, our management
has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of January 28, 2011.
113
As part of our settlement of an SEC investigation into certain
disclosure, accounting and financial reporting matters described
under the caption Legal Matters in Note 11 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Part II Item 8 Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data, we consented on
October 13, 2010 to perform the following undertakings
related to our disclosure processes, practices and controls:
|
|
|
For a minimum period of three years, enhance our disclosure
review committee (DRC) processes by having qualified
outside securities counsel attend all Dell meetings and review
all of our SEC periodic filings prior to filing.
|
|
|
Retain an independent consultant not unacceptable to the SEC
staff to review and evaluate our disclosure processes, practices
and controls and to recommend changes designed to improve those
processes, practices and controls, and, within 90 days
after issuance of the independent consultants report
containing such review, evaluation and recommendations, which
will be issued in March 2011, adopt and implement all
recommendations contained in the report.
|
|
|
For a minimum period of three years, provide annual training
reasonably designed to minimize the possibility of future
violations of the disclosure requirements of the federal
securities laws, with a focus on disclosures required in
managements discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations, for (1) members of the Audit
Committee of our Board of Directors; (2) members of the
DRC; (3) our senior officers; (4) our internal
disclosure counsel; (5) personnel in our internal audit
department who perform assurance services; (6) all persons
required to certify in our filings with the SEC that such
filings make adequate disclosure under federal securities laws;
and (7) all other persons employed by us who have
responsibility for the review of our filings with the SEC.
|
We will be required to certify to the SEC staff that we have
complied with the foregoing undertakings. We have initiated
actions to perform each of the undertakings.
Inherent
Limitations in Internal Controls
Our system of controls is designed to provide reasonable, not
absolute, assurance regarding the reliability and integrity of
accounting and financial reporting. Management does not expect
that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal
control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all
errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system
will be met. These inherent limitations include the following:
|
|
|
Judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and control and
process breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or
mistakes.
|
|
|
Controls can be circumvented by individuals, acting alone or in
collusion with each other, or by management override.
|
|
|
The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can
be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its
stated goals under all potential future conditions.
|
|
|
Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with
associated policies or procedures.
|
|
|
The design of a control system must reflect the fact that
resources are constrained, and the benefits of controls must be
considered relative to their costs.
|
ITEM 9B
OTHER INFORMATION
None.
114
PART III
ITEM 10
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Set forth below is the name and age of, and biographical
information about, each member of our board of directors, other
than Michael Dell, as of March 4, 2011. See
Part I Item 1
Business Executive Officers of Dell for
information about Michael Dell.
|
|
|
|
|
James W. Breyer (Age 49) Mr. Breyer
joined Accel Partners (an investment firm) in Palo Alto,
California in 1985 and is currently a Partner. Mr. Breyer
has been an investor in over 30 consumer Internet, media, and
technology companies that have completed public offerings or
successful mergers. Mr. Breyer is currently on the board of
directors of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., where he is the presiding
director. From June 2006 to December 2009, he was on
the board of Marvel Entertainment Inc. and from
October 1995 until June 2008, he served on the board
of Real Networks Inc. Mr. Breyer also serves on the boards
of directors of several private companies.
|
|
|
|
Donald J. Carty (Age 64) Mr. Carty
is the former Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of Dell,
having held that office from January 2007 until
June 2008. In that role, he was responsible for all finance
functions, including controller, corporate planning, tax,
treasury operations, investor relations, corporate development,
risk management, and corporate audit. Mr. Carty was the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of AMR Corporation and
American Airlines from 1998 until his retirement in 2003. He
served in a variety of executive positions with AMR Corporation,
AMR Airline Group and American Airlines from 1978 to 1985 and
from 1987 to 1999, including Chief Financial Officer of AMR
Corporation and American Airlines Inc. from October 1989
until March 1995. Mr. Carty was President and Chief
Executive Officer of Canadian Pacific Air Lines, known as CP
Air, in Canada from 1985 to 1987. After his retirement from AMR
and American Airlines Inc. in 2003, Mr. Carty was engaged
in numerous business and private investment activities with a
variety of companies. Mr. Carty is also a director of
Barrick Gold Corporation, Hawaiian Holdings Inc., Gluskin Sheff
and Associates, Talisman Energy Inc. and Canadian National
Railway Company. Additionally, Mr. Carty was a member of
the board of directors of CHC Helicopter Corp. from
November 2004 until September 2008, of Solution Inc.,
Ltd. from July 2004 until January 2007, of Sears
Holding Corp. from May 2001 until May 2007 and of
Placer Dome Inc. from April 2005 until March 2006.
|
|
|
|
William H. Gray, III (Age 69)
Mr. Gray is co-Chairman of GrayLoeffler L.L.C. (a
consulting and advisory firm), a position he has held since
August 2004. Mr. Gray was President and Chief
Executive Officer of The College Fund/UNCF (educational
assistance) from 1991 until he retired in June 2004. He was
a member of the United States House of Representatives from 1979
to 1991. During his tenure, he was Chairman of the House Budget
Committee, a member of the Appropriations Committee and Chairman
of the House Democratic Caucus and Majority Whip. He is an
ordained Baptist Minister and last pastored at Bright Hope
Baptist Church of Philadelphia from 1972 until 2007.
Mr. Gray is also a director of J.P. Morgan
Chase & Co., Prudential Financial Inc., and Pfizer
Inc. Additionally, from June 2000 to January 2010,
Mr. Gray was a director of Visteon Corporation.
|
|
|
|
Gerard J. Kleisterlee (Age 64)
Mr. Kleisterlee is President and Chief Executive Officer of
Royal Philips Electronics. Prior to his appointment as President
and Chief Executive Officer in April 2001,
Mr. Kleisterlee was President and Chief Operations Officer
of Philips. Previously, he held key positions within Royal
Philips Electronics, including member of the Board of Management
since April 2000, member of the Group Management Committee
since January 1999, Chief Executive Officer of
Philips Components division, President of Philips Taiwan,
Regional Manager for Philips Components in Asia-Pacific,
Managing Director of Philips Display Components worldwide,
General Manager of Philips Professional Audio Product
Group and various manufacturing management positions within
Philips Medical Systems division starting in 1974.
Mr. Kleisterlee also serves on the supervisory board of the
Dutch Central Bank , is chairman of the Foundation of the Cancer
Center Amsterdam of the Vu Medical Center and is a member of the
boards of directors of Daimler AG and Royal Dutch Shell.
|
|
|
|
Judy C. Lewent (Age 62) Until
September 2007, Ms. Lewent served as the Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Merck &
Co., Inc., a health care company. She served as Chief Financial
Officer
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
of Merck starting in 1990 and also held various other financial
and management positions after joining Merck in 1980.
Ms. Lewent is also a director of Thermo Fisher Scientific
Inc. and Motorola Solutions Inc. Additionally Ms. Lewent
served on the board of Motorola Inc. from 1995 until
May 2010. Ms. Lewent is a trustee and the chairperson
of the audit committee of the Rockefeller Family Trust, a life
member of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Corporation
and a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas W. Luce, III (Age 70)
Mr. Luce currently serves as President, Chief Executive
Officer, and Director of the National Math and Science
Initiative, a
not-for-profit
organization dedicated to expanding programs that have a proven
positive impact on math and science education. He served as
United States Assistant Secretary of Education for Planning,
Evaluation and Policy Development from July 1, 2005, until
his resignation on September 1, 2006. From 1997 until 2005,
Mr. Luce was a partner of the business advisory firm
Luce & Williams, Ltd. Mr. Luce was a founding
partner and managing partner of the law firm of
Hughes & Luce, LLP from 1973 until his retirement from
the firm in 1997, and was Of Counsel with that law firm until
December 2003.
|
|
|
|
Klaus S. Luft (Age 69) Mr. Luft is
the founder and Chairman of the supervisory board of Artedona
AG, a privately held mail order
e-commerce
company established in 1999 and headquartered in Munich,
Germany. He is also owner and President of Munich-based
MATCH Market Access Services GmbH & Co.,
KG. From 1990 until 2010, Mr. Luft served as Vice Chairman
and International Advisor to Goldman Sachs Europe Limited. From
March 1986 to November 1989, he was Chief Executive
Officer of Nixdorf Computer AG, where he served for more than
17 years in a variety of executive positions in marketing,
manufacturing, and finance. From May 2006 to
July 2007, Mr. Luft served on the board of Assurances
Generales de France, known as AGF, a French insurance company.
Mr. Luft is the Honorary Consul of the Republic of Estonia
in the State of Bavaria.
|
|
|
|
Alex J. Mandl (Age 67) Mr. Mandl is
currently the non-Executive Chairman of Gemalto N.V., a digital
security company resulting from the merger of Axalto Holding
N.V. and Gemplus International S.A. From June 2006 until
December 2007, Mr. Mandl served as Executive Chairman
of Gemalto. Before June 2006, Mr. Mandl was President,
Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board of Gemplus,
positions he held since August 2002. He has served as
Principal of ASM Investments, a company focusing on early stage
funding in the technology sector, since April 2001. From
1996 to March 2001, Mr. Mandl was Chairman and CEO of
Teligent, Inc., which offered business customers an alternative
to the Bell Companies for local, long distance and data
communication services. Mr. Mandl was AT&Ts
President and Chief Operating Officer from 1994 to 1996, and its
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 1991
to 1993. From 1988 to 1991, Mr. Mandl was Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer of
Sea-Land
Services Inc. Mr. Mandl served from May 2007 to
October 2010 as a director of Hewitt Associates, Inc. and
from March 2008 to October 2010 as a director of
Visteon Corporation. Mr. Mandl has been a member of the
board of directors of Horizon Lines, Inc. since January of 2007
and became the Chairman in February 2011.
|
|
|
|
Shantanu Narayen (Age 47)
Mr. Narayen is President and Chief Executive Officer of
Adobe Systems Incorporated, a software company. From
January 2005 until December 2007, Mr. Narayen was
Adobes President and Chief Operating Officer. Previously,
he held key product research and development positions within
Adobe, including Executive Vice President of Worldwide Products,
Senior Vice President of Worldwide Product Development, and Vice
President and General Manager of the Engineering Technology
Group. Before joining Adobe in 1998, he was a co-founder of
Pictra, Inc., an early pioneer of digital photo sharing over the
Internet. Prior to his service in that position, he served as
director of desktop and collaboration products at Silicon
Graphics, Inc. and held various senior management positions at
Apple Computer, Inc. Mr. Narayen also serves on the
advisory board of the Haas School of Business of the University
of California, Berkley and is president of the board of
directors of the Adobe Foundation, which funds philanthropic
initiatives around the world.
|
|
|
|
Sam Nunn (Age 72) Mr. Nunn is
Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Nuclear Threat
Initiative (NTI), a charitable organization working to reduce
the global threats from nuclear, biological and
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
chemical weapons. He was a senior partner at the law firm of
King & Spalding, Atlanta, Georgia, from 1997 until
2003. From 1972 through 1996, he served as a United States
Senator from Georgia. During his tenure as Senator, he served as
Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee and the
Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. He also served on the
Intelligence and Small Business Committees. Mr. Nunn also
serves as a director of Chevron Corporation, The
Coca-Cola
Company and General Electric Company and is a Director Emeritus
of Total Systems Inc. From October 1999 to October 20,
2006, Mr. Nunn served on the board of directors of Internet
Security Systems, Inc. and from February 1997 to
February 2006, served on the board of directors of
Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Ross Perot Jr. (Age 52)
Mr. Perot is currently chairman of Hillwood Development
Company, a real estate development company, which he founded in
1988. Mr. Perot served as the Chairman of the Board of
Perot Systems Corporation from September 2004 until its
acquisition by Dell on November 3, 2009. Mr. Perot
also served as a director of Perot Systems from June 1988
until November 3, 2009, and as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Perot Systems from September 2000
until September 2004. Mr. Perot served in the United
States Air Force for eight and a half years. He currently serves
on the board of directors of the EastWest Institute and the
Dallas Committee of Foreign Relations.
|
We have adopted a code of ethics applicable to our principal
executive officer and other senior financial officers, who
include our principal financial officer, principal accounting
officer or controller, and persons performing similar functions.
The code of ethics, which we refer to as our Code of Conduct, is
available on our Internet website at www.dell.com. To the
extent required by SEC rules, we intend to disclose any
amendments to this code and any waiver of a provision of the
code for the benefit of our principal executive officer,
principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or
controller, or persons performing similar functions, on our
website within four business days following any such amendment
or waiver, or within any other period that may be required under
SEC rules from time to time.
See Part I Item 1
Business Executive Officers of Dell for
information about our executive officers, which is incorporated
by reference in this Item 10. Other information required by
this Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference to our
definitive proxy statement for our 2011 annual meeting of
stockholders, referred to as the 2011 proxy
statement, which we will file with the SEC on or before
120 days after our 2011 fiscal year-end, and which will
appear in the 2011 proxy statement under the captions
Proposal 1 Election of Directors
and Additional Information Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.
ITEM 11
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information required by this Item 11 is incorporated herein
by reference to the 2011 proxy statement, including the
information in the 2011 proxy statement appearing under the
captions Proposal 1 Election of
Directors Director Compensation and
Executive Compensation.
ITEM 12
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information required by this Item 12 is incorporated herein
by reference to the 2011 proxy statement, including the
information in the 2011 proxy statement appearing under the
captions Stock Ownership and Executive
Compensation Equity Compensation Plans.
117
ITEM 13
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
Information required by this Item 13 is incorporated herein
by reference to the 2011 proxy statement, including the
information in the 2011 proxy statement appearing under the
captions Proposal 1 Elections of
Directors and Additional Information
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
ITEM 14
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Information required by this Item 14 is incorporated herein
by reference to the 2011 proxy statement, including the
information in the 2011 proxy statement appearing under the
caption Proposal 2 Ratification of
Independent Auditor.
118
PART IV
ITEM 15
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Financial
Statements
The following financial statements are filed as a part of this
report under Part II
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position at
January 28, 2011, and January 29, 2010
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended
January 28, 2011, January 29, 2010, and
January 30, 2009
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended
January 28, 2011, January 29, 2010, and
January 30, 2009
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the
fiscal years ended January 28, 2011, January 29, 2010,
and January 30, 2009
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
61
|
|
A list of the exhibits filed or furnished with this report (or
incorporated by reference to exhibits previously filed or
furnished) is provided in the Exhibit index on page 123 of
this report.
119
Financial
Statement Schedule
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
for the three fiscal years ended January 28, 2011,
January 29, 2010, and January 30, 2009 is included in
Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
included in Part II
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data. All other schedules called for by
Form 10-K
are omitted because they are inapplicable or the required
information is shown in the consolidated financial statements,
or notes thereto, included herein.
120
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
DELL INC.
Michael S. Dell
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Duly authorized officer)
Date: March 15, 2011
121
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and as of the
date indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/
MICHAEL S. DELL
Michael
S. Dell
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer)
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
JAMES W. BREYER
James
W. Breyer
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
DONALD J. CARTY
Donald
J. Carty
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
WILLIAM H. GRAY, III
William
H. Gray, III
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
GERARD J. KLEISTERLEE
Gerard
J. Kleisterlee
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
JUDY C. LEWENT
Judy
C. Lewent
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
THOMAS W. LUCE, III
Thomas
W. Luce III
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
KLAUS S. LUFT
Klaus
S. Luft
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
ALEX J. MANDL
Alex
J. Mandl
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
SHANTANU NARAYEN
Shantanu
Narayen
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
SAMUEL A. NUNN, JR.
Samuel
A. Nunn, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
H. ROSS PEROT, JR.
H.
Ross Perot, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
BRIAN T. GLADDEN
Brian
T. Gladden
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal
financial officer)
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
THOMAS W. SWEET
Thomas
W. Sweet
|
|
Vice President, Corporate Finance and Chief Accounting Officer
(principal accounting officer)
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
122
Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
of Dell Inc. (Dell) for the fiscal quarter ended
July 30, 2010, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Restated Bylaws, as amended and effective as of August 16,
2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of
Dells Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended July 30, 2010, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of April 27, 1998, between Dell
Computer Corporation (Dell) and Chase Bank of Texas,
National Association (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.2 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed April 28, 1998, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Officers Certificate pursuant to Section 301 of the
Indenture establishing the terms of Dells 7.10% Senior
Debentures Due 2028 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.4 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed April 28, 1998, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Form of Dells 7.10% Senior Debentures Due 2028
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.6 of Dells
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed April 28, 1998, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of April 17, 2008, between Dell and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (formerly The
Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.), as trustee
(including the form of notes) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed April 17, 2008, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of April 6, 2009, between Dell and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Dells
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed April 6, 2009, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated April 6, 2009, between
Dell and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.,
as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of
Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed April 6, 2009, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
|
|
Form of 5.625% Notes due 2014 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed April 6, 2009, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated June 15, 2009, between
Dell and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.,
as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of
Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed June 15, 2009, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.9
|
|
|
|
Form of 3.375% Notes due 2012 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed June 15, 2009, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.10
|
|
|
|
Form of 5.875% Notes due 2019 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed June 15, 2009, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.11
|
|
|
|
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated September 10, 2010,
between Dell and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1
of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed September 10, 2010, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.12
|
|
|
|
Form of 1.40% Notes due 2013 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed September 10, 2010, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.13
|
|
|
|
Form of 2.30% Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed September 10, 2010, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.14
|
|
|
|
Form of 5.40% Notes due 2040 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.4 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed September 10, 2010, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.1*
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Dell Computer Corporation 1994 Incentive
Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 of
Dells Registration Statement on
Form S-8
filed October 31, 2000, Registration
No. 333-49014)
|
|
10
|
.2*
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Dell Computer Corporation 1998 Broad-Based
Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99
of Dells Registration Statement on
Form S-8
filed October 31, 2000, Registration
No. 333-49016)
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
10
|
.3*
|
|
|
|
Dell Computer Corporation 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Dells
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended August 2, 2002, Commission
File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.4*
|
|
|
|
Dell Inc. Amended and Restated 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Appendix A of Dells
2007 proxy statement filed October 31, 2007, Commission
File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.5*
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Dell Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan
effective as of January 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.7 of Dells Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2009, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.6*
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Dell Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for
Non-Employee Directors effective as of January 1, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Dells
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2009, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.7*
|
|
|
|
Executive Annual Incentive Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference
to Appendix A of Dells 2008 proxy statement filed
June 2, 2008, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.8*
|
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Non-Employee Directors
under the 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed July 27, 2006, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.9*
|
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Non-Employee
Directors under the 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Dells Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed July 27, 2006, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.10*
|
|
|
|
Form of Stock Unit Agreement for grant to Donald J. Carty under
the 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.2 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed December 20, 2006, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.11*
|
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Non-Employee
Directors under the Amended and Restated 2002 Long-Term
Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10
of Dells Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended May 4, 2007, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.12*
|
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Non-Employee
Directors under the Amended and Restated 2002 Long-Term
Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.13*
|
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Executive Officers
under the Amended and Restated 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of Dells
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2009, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.14*
|
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Executive Officers
under the Amended and Restated 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Dells
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2010, Commission
File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.15*
|
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for New Hire Senior
Executive Officers under the Amended and Restated 2002 Long-Term
Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5
of Dells Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2010, Commission
File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.16*
|
|
|
|
Form of Performance Based Stock Unit Agreement for employees
under the 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed March 14, 2006, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.17*
|
|
|
|
Form of Performance Based Stock Unit Agreement for Executive
Officers under the Amended and Restated 2002 Long-Term Incentive
Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of
Dells Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2008, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.18*
|
|
|
|
Form of Performance Based Stock Unit Agreement for Executive
Officers under the Amended and Restated 2002 Long-Term Incentive
Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of
Dells Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2009, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
10
|
.19*
|
|
|
|
Form of Performance Based Stock Unit Agreement for Key Vice
Presidents under the Amended and Restated 2002 Long-Term
Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
of Dells Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2010, Commission
File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.20*
|
|
|
|
Form of Performance Based Stock Unit Agreement for
Communications Solutions Executive Officers under the Amended
and Restated 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Dells Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2010, Commission
File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.21*
|
|
|
|
Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee
Directors under the 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of Dells Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed July 27, 2006, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.22*
|
|
|
|
Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement for grant to Donald
J. Carty under the 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Dells Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed December 20, 2006, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.23*
|
|
|
|
Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee
Directors under the Amended and Restated 2002 Long-Term
Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11
of Dells Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended May 4, 2007, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.24*
|
|
|
|
Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement for Executive
Officers under the Amended and Restated 2002 Long-Term Incentive
Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of
Dells Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2009, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.25*
|
|
|
|
Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement for Executive
Officers under the Amended and Restated 2002 Long-Term Incentive
Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of
Dells Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2010, Commission
File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.26*
|
|
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between Dell and each
Non-Employee Director of Dell (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.11 to Dells Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2003, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.27*
|
|
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between Dell and each
Executive Officer of Dell
|
|
10
|
.28*
|
|
|
|
Form of Protection of Sensitive Information, Noncompetition and
Nonsolicitation Agreement (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.3 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed February 21, 2007, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.29*
|
|
|
|
Form of Protection of Sensitive Information, Noncompetition and
Nonsolicitation Agreement for Executive Officers (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Dells Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed July 16, 2007, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.30*
|
|
|
|
Form of Protection of Sensitive Information, Noncompetition and
Nonsolicitation Agreement for Executive Officers (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Dells Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed September 12, 2007, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.31*
|
|
|
|
Retention Bonus, Merger and Modification Agreement between Dell
and Ronald G. Garriques (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.1 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed March 9, 2009, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.32*
|
|
|
|
Separation Agreement and Release between Ronald G. Garriques and
Dell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of
Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed November 17, 2010, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
10
|
.33*
|
|
|
|
Separation Agreement and Release between Dell and Peter Altabef
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Dells
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed January 13, 2011, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
12
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Dell
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Michael S. Dell, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Brian T. Gladden, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certifications of Michael S. Dell, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, and Brian T. Gladden, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
|
101
|
.INS§
|
|
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
101
|
.SCH§
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
101
|
.CAL§
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.LAB§
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.PRE§
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.DEF§
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Identifies Exhibit that consists of or includes a management
contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|
|
|
Filed with this report. |
|
|
|
Furnished with this report. |
|
§ |
|
Furnished with this report. In accordance with Rule 406T of
Regulation S-T,
the information in these exhibits shall not be deemed to be
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to liability under that section, and shall not be
incorporated by reference into any registration statement or
other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as §
amended, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in
such filing. |
126