UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant    þ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant    o

Check the appropriate box:

o		Preliminary Proxy Statement
o		Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ		Definitive Proxy Statement
o		Definitive Additional Materials
o		Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

þ		No fee required.
o		Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

1)     Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

2)     Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

3)     Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

4)     Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

5)     Total fee paid:

o   Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o   Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

1)     Amount Previously Paid:

2)     Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

3)     Filing Party:

4)     Date Filed:

SEC 1913 (02-02)		Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number.

 

OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held on May 17, 2011

 

To the Stockholders of
Oil States International, Inc.:

 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Oil States International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), will be held at the Hotel Granduca at 1080 Uptown Park Boulevard, Houston, Texas, 77056 on the 17th day of May, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. central time (the “Annual Meeting”), for the following purposes:

 

(1) To elect three (3) Class I members of the Board of Directors to serve until the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (see page 3);

 

(2) To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent accountants for the year ended December 31, 2011 (see page 35);

 

(3) Advisory vote on Executive Compensation (see page 38);

 

(4) Advisory vote regarding frequency of Advisory vote on Executive Compensation (see page 39); and

 

(5) To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.

 

The Company has fixed the close of business on March 31, 2011 as the record date for determining stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournments thereof. Stockholders who execute proxies solicited by the Board of Directors of the Company retain the right to revoke them at any time; unless so revoked, the shares of common stock represented by such proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the directions given therein. If a stockholder does not specify a choice on such stockholder’s proxy, the proxy will be voted “FOR” the nominees for director named in the attached Proxy Statement and “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of the independent accountants for the Company named in such Proxy Statement. The list of stockholders of record of the Company may be examined at the offices of the Company beginning on April 1, 2011 and at the Annual Meeting.

 

Further information regarding the Annual Meeting is set forth in the attached Proxy Statement.

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 17, 2011: A COPY OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT, PROXY VOTING CARD AND THE COMPANY’S 2011 ANNUAL SHAREHOLDERS’ REPORT ARE AVAILABLE AT HTTP://WWW.OILSTATESINTL.COM/PROXYMATERIALS

 

By Order of the Board of Directors

 

Sincerely,

 

 

Robert W. Hampton
Corporate Secretary

 

Houston, Texas

April 1, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

 

PROXY STATEMENT
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF

To Be Held on Thursday, May 17, 2011

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

 

Three Allen Center
333 Clay Street, Suite 4620
Houston, Texas 77002

 

 

The following information is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors of Oil States International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), to be voted at the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company (the “Annual Meeting”), which will be held at the Hotel Granduca at 1080 Uptown Park Boulevard, Houston, Texas, 77056, on the 17th day of May, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. central time, for the following purposes:

 

(1) To elect three (3) Class I members of the Board of Directors to serve until the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders;

 

(2) To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent accountants for the year ended December 31, 2011;

 

(3) Advisory vote on Executive Compensation;

 

(4) Advisory vote regarding frequency of Advisory vote on Executive Compensation; and

 

(5) To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.

 

You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised by: (1) sending a written statement revoking your proxy to Robert W. Hampton, Oil States International, Inc., Three Allen Center, 333 Clay Street, Suite 4620, Houston, Texas 77002; (2) submitting a properly signed proxy with new voting instructions with a later date; or (3) voting in person at the Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in street name and you vote by proxy, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your bank, banker or nominee in accordance with the entity’s procedures. If you return your signed proxy to us before the Annual Meeting, we will vote your shares as you direct. If you do not specify on your proxy card how you want to vote your shares, we will vote them “for” the election of all nominees for director as set forth under “Proposal 1: Election of Directors” on page 3; “for” the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent accountants as set forth under “Proposal 2: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Accountants” on page 35; “for” the approval of the “Proposal 3 — Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation” on page 38 and “for” a one year frequency as set forth under “Proposal 4 — Advisory Vote regarding Frequency of Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation” on page 39. If any other business is brought before the meeting, any unspecified proxies will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the persons voting those shares.

 

The cost of soliciting proxies will be paid by the Company. In addition to the use of the mail, proxies may be solicited by the directors, officers and employees of the Company without additional compensation, by personal interview, telephone, telegram, or other means of electronic communication. Arrangements also may be made with brokerage firms and other custodians, dealers, banks and trustees, or their nominees who hold the voting securities of record, for sending proxy materials to beneficial owners. Upon request, the Company will reimburse the brokers, custodians, dealers, banks, or their nominees for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. In addition, the Company has retained Morrow & Co., LLC to assist in the solicitation of proxies and to serve as the inspector of election for the Annual Meeting, for which the Company will pay an estimated fee of $6,500.

 

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, is being mailed with this Proxy Statement to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting but does not constitute a part of the proxy soliciting material.

 

This Proxy Statement and the enclosed form of proxy were mailed to stockholders beginning April 15, 2011.

 

Oil States International, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (“Company,” “Oil States,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Oil States International, Inc. and its subsidiaries), has one outstanding class of security that entitle holders to vote at meetings of the Company’s stockholders, it’s common stock, par value $.01 per share. Each share of common stock outstanding on the record date is entitled to one vote. Stockholders may not cumulate their votes.

 

The record date for the stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting is the close of business on March 31, 2011. At the record date 51,169,512 shares of common stock were outstanding and entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting.

 

The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the votes eligible to be cast at the Annual Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. If a quorum is not present, the stockholders entitled to vote who are present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting have the power to adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time, without notice other than an announcement at the Annual Meeting, until a quorum is present. At any adjourned Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present, any business may be transacted that might have been transacted at the Annual Meeting as originally notified.

 

Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes present and entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting. However, in accordance with the Company’s corporate governance guidelines, any director who does not receive a majority of votes cast in an uncontested election is required to tender his or her resignation for consideration of the Board of Directors. Ratification of the selection of the Company’s auditors will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present and entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting. An automated system that the Company’s transfer agent administers will tabulate the votes. Brokers who hold shares in street name for customers are required to vote shares in accordance with instructions received from the beneficial owners. Brokers are permitted to vote on discretionary items if they have not received instructions from the beneficial owners, but they are not permitted to vote (a “broker non-vote”) on non-discretionary items absent instructions from the beneficial owner. An uncontested director election, like ours in 2011, is not a “routine” discretionary matter where a broker is allowed to vote, absent instructions from beneficial owners. Abstentions and broker non-votes will count in determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting. Both abstentions and broker non-votes will not have any effect on the outcome of voting on director elections. For purposes of voting on the ratification of the selection of auditors and the advisory votes on executive compensation and regarding the frequency of advisory vote on executive compensation, broker non-votes are not counted as votes with respect to the proposal. Abstentions occur when stockholders are present at the annual meeting but choose to withhold their vote for any of the matters upon which the stockholders are voting. “Broker non-votes” occur when nominees (such as banks and brokers) that hold shares on behalf of beneficial owners do not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owners before the meeting and do not have discretionary authority to vote those shares under the applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”).

 

A proxy in the accompanying form that is properly signed and returned will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions on the proxy. Any properly executed proxy on which no contrary instructions have been indicated about a proposal will be voted as follows with respect to the proposal: FOR the election of the three persons named in this Proxy Statement as the Board of Directors’ nominees for election to the Board of Directors; FOR the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent accountants; for the approval of the advisory vote on executive compensation; for a one year frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation; and in accordance with the discretion of the holders of the Proxy with respect to any other business that properly comes before the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors knows of no matters, other than those previously stated, to be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. The persons named in the accompanying proxy may also, in their discretion, vote the proxy to adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time.

 

A copy of the list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting has been available for inspection by qualified stockholders for proper purposes at the offices of the Company during normal business hours beginning on April 1, 2011 and will be available at the Annual Meeting.

 

The Board of Directors is currently comprised of nine members. The nine members are divided into three classes having three members in Class I, Class II and Class III. Each class is elected for a term of three years, so that the term of one class of directors expires at each annual meeting of stockholders. The term of the three current Class I directors will expire at the Annual Meeting. The term of the Class II directors expires at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2012, and the term of the Class III directors expires at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 2013.

 

Nominees

 

Three directors are to be elected to serve as Class I directors at the Annual Meeting. Based on the recommendation of our Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee, the Board of Directors has nominated Christopher T. Seaver, Douglas E. Swanson and Cindy B. Taylor to fill the three expiring Class I positions on the Board of Directors, to hold office for three-year terms expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2014, and until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation or removal. All of the director nominees, Messrs. Seaver and Swanson and Mrs. Taylor, presently serve as Class I directors. Stockholder nominations will not be accepted for filling Board of Directors seats at the Annual Meeting because our bylaws require advance notice for such a nomination, the time for which has passed. Our Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Seaver and Swanson are “independent” as that term is defined by the applicable NYSE listing standards. See “— Director Independence” below for a discussion of director independence determinations. The enclosed proxy (unless otherwise directed, revoked or suspended) will be voted FOR the election of the three nominees for director.

 

A plurality of votes cast is required for the election of directors. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require any director who does not receive a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election to tender their resignation for the consideration of the Board of Directors. Each of the nominees has consented to serve as director if so elected. If any nominee should be unable to serve as a director, the shares represented by proxies will be voted for the election of a substitute nominated by the Board of Directors to replace such nominee.

 

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the election of each of the nominees.

 

Set forth below are the names of, and certain information with respect to, the Company’s executive officers and directors, including the three nominees for election to the Class I positions on the Board of Directors.

 

 

 

 

Stephen A. Wells has served as a Director of our Company since April 1996 and as Chairman since May 2006. Mr. Wells is the President of Wells Resources, Inc., a privately owned oil, gas and ranching company, and has served in that position since 1983. From October 1993 to February 1996, he was a director and Chief Executive Officer of Coastwide Energy Services, Inc., a Gulf Coast marine terminal operator. From March 1992 to September 1994, he was a director and Chief Executive Officer of Grasso Corporation, an oil and gas production management services company. Mr. Wells served as a director and a member of the audit and executive committees of Pogo Producing Company (NYSE: PPP), an oil and gas exploration and production company until it was acquired in November 2007. Mr. Wells was a director and a member of the audit committee of Crosstex Energy LP (NASDAQ: XTEX) until December 2005.

 

Cindy B. Taylor is the Chief Executive Officer and President of our Company and is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. She has held these positions since May 2007. From May 2006 until May 2007, Mrs. Taylor served as President and Chief Operating Officer of our Company. From May 2000 until May 2006, Mrs. Taylor was the Senior Vice President — Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of our Company. From August 1999 to May 2000, Mrs. Taylor was the Chief Financial Officer of L.E. Simmons & Associates, Incorporated. Mrs. Taylor served as the Vice President — Controller of Cliffs Drilling Company from July 1992 to August 1999 and held various management positions with Ernst & Young LLP, a public accounting firm, from January 1984 to July 1992. She received a B.B.A. degree from Texas A&M University and is a Certified Public Accountant. Mrs. Taylor served on the Board of Boots & Coots International Well Control, Inc., (AMEX: WEL), an oilfield services company that provided integrated pressure control and related services worldwide from March 2006 to May 2008. Mrs. Taylor was a director and served on the audit and finance committees of Global Industries LTD (NASDAQ: GLBL), a company which provides worldwide construction and support services to the offshore oil and

gas industry, from May 2006 until May 2009. She is currently a director of Tidewater Inc. (NYSE: TDW), a global provider of vessels serving the offshore energy industry. Mrs. Taylor currently serves on the audit and finance committees of Tidewater Inc.

 

Bradley J. Dodson is the Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of our Company. He has held this position since May 2010. Mr. Dodson has held several positions with our Company since joining in March 2001, most recently serving as Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from May 2006 to April 2010 and Vice President, Corporate Development from March 2003 to May 2006. From June 1998 to March 2001, Mr. Dodson served in several positions for L.E. Simmons & Associates, Incorporated, a private equity firm specializing in oilfield service investments. From July 1996 to June 1998, Mr. Dodson worked in the mergers and acquisitions group of Merrill Lynch & Co. He holds a M.B.A. degree from the University of Texas at Austin and a B.A. degree in economics from Duke University.

 

Robert W. Hampton is the Senior Vice President, Accounting and Corporate Secretary of our Company. He has held this position since May 2006. From February 2001 until May 2006, Mr. Hampton was the Vice President — Finance and Accounting and Secretary of our Company. From February 1998 to February 2001, Mr. Hampton served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of HWC Energy Services, Inc., a predecessor of our Company (“HWC”). Mr. Hampton joined HWC from Tidewater Inc., an offshore service vessel operator, where he was based in Aberdeen and was Area Manager for the North Sea Operations from March 1996 to February 1998. He served as Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Hornbeck Offshore, an offshore service vessel operator, from 1990 to March 1996, when it was acquired by Tidewater. Mr. Hampton worked at Price Waterhouse, a public accounting firm, from 1973 to 1986. Mr. Hampton is a Certified Public Accountant and received his B.S. degree from Pennsylvania State University.

 

Christopher E. Cragg is the Senior Vice President, Operations of our Company. He has held this position since May 2006. From February 2001 until May 2006, Mr. Cragg was the Vice President — Tubular Services of our Company. Mr. Cragg was Executive Vice President — Chief Financial Officer of Sooner Inc., a predecessor of our Company (“Sooner”), from December 1999 to February 2001. Mr. Cragg also served as President of Sooner from October 2003 until May 2006. From April 1994 to June 1999, he was Vice President and Controller of Ocean Energy, Inc., an independent oil and gas exploration and production company, and its predecessor companies. Mr. Cragg served as Manager — Internal Audit with Cooper Industries, a manufacturer of diversified products, from April 1993 to April 1994 and as a senior manager with Price Waterhouse, a public accounting firm, from August 1983 to April 1993. Mr. Cragg is a director and serves on the audit and compensation committees of Powell Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: POWL), a company that manufactures and services electrical energy systems. He received a B.B.A. degree from Southwestern University and is a Certified Public Accountant.

 

Lias J. Steen serves as the Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Legal for our Company since February 2011. From June 2008 to January 2011 he was the Vice President, Human Resources and Legal. A native of Cuero, Texas, Jeff Steen has been involved in the energy service business in various capacities since 1978, starting his career as a petroleum landman. Mr. Steen spent 10 years with Camco International Inc. as Assistant General Counsel and General Counsel. Following his tenure at Camco, Mr. Steen served for 5 years as the General Counsel for North America for Schlumberger, then, from December 2002 to April 2008, he served as Vice President of Legal and Human Resources at Grant Prideco. Mr. Steen is a graduate of Texas A&M University with a B.S. in Agricultural Economics and received his Juris Doctor from South Texas College of Law.

 

Charles J. Moses has been the Company’s Senior Vice President, Offshore Products business since January 1, 2010. Mr. Moses also serves as President of Oil States Industries, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Mr. Moses has served various positions during his career at the Company’s offshore products business spanning the past 38 years. He was the Senior Vice President of Oil States Industries, Inc., the Company’s offshore products subsidiary from 1996 to December 2009.

 

Ron R. Green is the Senior Vice President, Accommodations and President and Chief Executive Officer — PTI Group Inc. (“PTI”), a wholly owned subsidiary of our Company. He has held this position since April 2006. From December 2005 to March 2006 he was Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of PTI. From November 2004 to November 2005, Mr. Green served as Vice President, Premium Camp Services for PTI. Prior to joining PTI, Mr. Green served as Vice President and General Manager of ESS Remote Site Services, a division of Compass

Group PLC from October 1995 to August 2003. From 1975 to 1995, Mr. Green held various senior executive positions in the accommodations industry.

 

Martin A. Lambert has served as a Director of our Company since February 2001. Mr. Lambert’s principal occupation since November 1, 2008 has been as Chief Executive Officer, Swan Hills Synfuels LP, an in-situ coal gasification company. Prior thereto, Mr. Lambert served as a founder and managing director of Matco Capital Ltd., a private equity firm focused in the energy sector, since mid-2002. Mr. Lambert was a partner in the Canadian law firm Bennett Jones LLP from March 1987 to March 2007 and served as the Chief Executive Officer of that firm from 1996 to 2000. He served as a Director of Calfrac Well Services Ltd., from March 2004 to May 2010. Mr. Lambert currently is a director of Zedi, Inc. (CN: ZED), a public company involved in Canadian, U.S. and other international oilfield services. He presently serves on the compensation committee and is Chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committee of Zedi, Inc. Mr. Lambert received his LLB degree from the University of Alberta in 1979.

 

S. James Nelson has served as a Director of our Company since July 2004. In 2004, he retired, after 15 years of service, from Cal Dive International, Inc. (now known as Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.), a marine contractor and operator of offshore oil and natural gas properties and production facilities, where he was a founding shareholder, Chief Financial Officer from 1990 to 2000, and director (1990 — 2004) and director and Vice Chairman from 2000 to 2004. From 1985 to 1988, Mr. Nelson was a Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Diversified Energies, Inc., (NYSE: DEI). From 1980 to 1985, Mr. Nelson served as Chief Financial Officer of Apache Corporation (NYSE: APA), an oil and gas exploration and production company. From 1966 to 1980, Mr. Nelson was employed with Arthur Andersen L.L.P., where, from 1976 to 1980, he was a partner serving on the firm’s worldwide oil and gas industry team. He received a B.S. in Accounting from Holy Cross College and a M.B.A. degree from Harvard University. Mr. Nelson is also a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Nelson is a director and a member of the audit committee of ION Geophysical Corp. (formerly Input/Output, Inc.) (NYSE: IO), a seismic services provider; W&T Offshore, Inc. (NYSE: WTI), an oil and gas exploration and production company where he is a member of the audit and compensation committees; and Genesis Energy LP (AMEX: GEL), a U.S. based mid-stream pipeline transportation, refinery services, industrial gases and supply and logistics company where he is a member of the audit committee; and, from 2005 until the company’s sale in 2008, he was also a member of the board of directors and audit and compensation committees of Quintana Maritime Ltd. (NASDAQ: QMAR), an international provider of dry bulk cargo marine transportation services.

 

Mark G. Papa has served as a Director of our Company since February 2001. Mr. Papa has served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of EOG Resources, Inc. (NYSE: EOG), an oil and gas exploration and production company, since August 1999. From February 1994 to August 1999, he held a number of management positions with EOG Resources, Inc. He has a petroleum engineering degree from the University of Pittsburgh and a M.B.A. degree from the University of Houston.

 

Gary L. Rosenthal has served as a Director of our Company since February 2001. Mr. Rosenthal has been a partner in The Sterling Group, L.P., a private equity firm since January 2005. Mr. Rosenthal served as Chairman of the Board of Hydrochem Holdings, Inc. from May 2003 until December 2004. From August 1998 to April 2001, he served as Chief Executive Officer of AXIA Incorporated, a diversified manufacturing company. He holds J.D. and A.B. degrees from Harvard University.

 

Christopher T. Seaver has served as Director of our Company since May 2008. Mr. Seaver served as the President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of Hydril Co. (“Hydril”) from February 1997 until Hydril was acquired in May 2007 at which point he retired. From 1993 until 1997, Mr. Seaver served as President of Hydril. Mr. Seaver joined Hydril in 1985 and served as Executive Vice President in charge of Hydril’s premium connection and pressure control businesses prior to February 1993. Prior to joining Hydril, Mr. Seaver was a corporate and securities attorney for Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, and was a Foreign Service Officer in the U.S. Department of State with postings in Kinshasa, Republic of Congo and Bogota, Colombia. He holds a B.A. in economics from Yale University and M.B.A. and J.D. degrees from Stanford University. Mr. Seaver is a director and member of the audit committee and nominating and corporate governance committee of Exterran Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: EXH), a company that sells, operates and maintains compression equipment used in the oil and gas industry worldwide. Mr. Seaver is on the board of directors and is a member of the audit committee of McCoy Corporation (TSX: MCB),

a company that manufactures drilling and completion equipment and designs and manufactures heavy-duty trailers for the oil and gas sector in Canada and internationally. Mr. Seaver is on the board of directors of Innovative Wireline Solutions, a start-up wireline services business serving oil and gas operators in western Canada.

 

Douglas E. Swanson has served as a Director of our Company since February 2001 and served as our Chief Executive Officer from February 2001 until he retired in April 2007. From January 1992 to August 1999, Mr. Swanson served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Cliffs Drilling Company, a contract drilling company. He holds a B.A. degree from Cornell College and is a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Swanson was a director and member of the compensation committee of Flint Energy Services, Ltd., (Toronto: FEX: TO) a Canadian integrated midstream oil and gas production services provider from April 2000 to May 2010. He was Chairman of the Board of Directors of Boots and Coots International Well Control, Inc. (AMEX: WEL), an oilfield services company that provided integrated pressure control and related services worldwide from March 2006 to September 2010.

 

William T. Van Kleef has served as a Director of our Company since May 2006. Mr. Van Kleef has served in executive management positions at Tesoro Corporation (“Tesoro”) (NYSE: TSO) from 1993 until he retired in March 2005, most recently as Tesoro’s Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. During his tenure at Tesoro, Mr. Van Kleef held various positions, including President, Tesoro Refining and Marketing, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Before joining Tesoro, Mr. Van Kleef, a Certified Public Accountant, served in various financial and accounting positions with Damson Oil from 1982 to 1991, most recently as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Van Kleef serves on the board of directors and the audit committee of Noble Energy (NYSE: NBL), an independent oil and gas company.

 

Corporate Governance Guidelines

 

The Company has adopted corporate governance guidelines entitled “Corporate Governance Guidelines,” which are available at www.oilstatesintl.com by first clicking “Corporate Governance” and then “Corporate Governance Guidelines.” These guidelines were adopted by the Board of Directors to best ensure that the Board of Directors is independent from management, that the Board of Directors adequately performs its function as the overseer of management and to help ensure that the interests of the Board of Directors and management are aligned with the interests of the stockholders.

 

Board of Directors Leadership

 

Since the Company’s initial public offering in 2001, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer roles have been split with the Chairman of the Board role being filled by a non-executive member of the Board of Directors. We believe the separation of these two positions leads to a strong independent leadership structure.

 

Corporate Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

 

All directors, officers and employees of Oil States must act ethically at all times and in accordance with the policies comprising Oil States ethics policy entitled “Corporate Code of Business Conduct and Ethics” (“Conduct & Ethics Code”). This policy is available at the Company’s web site www.oilstatesintl.com by first clicking “Corporate Governance” and then “Corporate Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.”

 

Substantially all of our employees are required to complete online training on an annual basis which includes a review of the Conduct and Ethics Code policy and an acknowledgement that the employee has read and understands the policy. The Company has a Compliance Committee composed of key employees that meets periodically to assess efforts and processes to ensure compliance with laws and regulations to which the Company is subject.

 

Director Resignation Policy

 

If a director’s principal occupation or business association changes substantially during his or her tenure as a director, that director is required by our Corporate Governance Guidelines to inform the Chairman of the

Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee of the change and tender his or her resignation to the Committee for consideration. Such resignation shall not be effective unless and until the Board of Directors chooses to accept the resignation in accordance with the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. While not necessarily resulting in a resignation, the offer will provide the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee the opportunity to consider the appropriateness of continued Board of Directors membership and make a recommendation to the Board of Directors as to the director’s continuation. The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee will recommend to the Board of Directors the action, if any, to be taken with respect to the resignation, and the Board of Directors will consider whether the change in the director’s professional responsibilities directly or indirectly impacts that person’s ability to fulfill directorship obligations.

 

Similarly, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require a director who does not receive a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election to tender their resignation for consideration of the Company’s Board of Directors.

 

Director Independence

 

To qualify as “independent” under the NYSE listing standards, a director must meet objective criteria set forth in the NYSE listing standards, and the Board of Directors must affirmatively determine that the director has no material relationship with us (either directly or as a stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us) that would interfere with his or her exercise of independent judgment in carrying out his or her responsibilities as a director.

 

The Board of Directors reviews all direct or indirect business relationships between each director (including his or her immediate family) and our Company, as well as each director’s relationships with charitable organizations, to assess director independence as defined in the listing standards of the NYSE. The NYSE listing standards include a series of objective tests, such as that the director is not an employee of our Company and has not engaged in various types of business dealings with our Company. In addition, as further required by the NYSE, the Board of Directors has made a subjective determination as to each independent director that no material relationships exist which, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of his or her independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. When assessing the materiality of a director’s relationship with us, the Board of Directors considers the issue not merely from the standpoint of the director, but also from the standpoint of the persons or organizations with which the director has an affiliation. The Board of Directors has determined that all of our directors, except for Cindy Taylor, our current President and Chief Executive Officer, qualify as “independent” in accordance with NYSE listing standards.

 

In particular, in 2011, the Board of Directors evaluated Mark Papa’s position as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of EOG Resources, Inc. (“EOG”), even though EOG only purchased products and services from us in 2010 in an amount equal to less than 1% of EOG’s 2010 revenues. Our Board of Directors has determined that our relationship with EOG is not material to the independence of Mr. Papa.

 

Policies and Procedures with Respect to Related Party Transactions and Conflicts of Interest

 

We review all relationships and transactions in which we and our directors and executive officers or their immediate family members are participants to determine whether such persons have a direct or indirect material interest. Our Corporate Secretary’s office is primarily responsible for the development and implementation of processes and controls to obtain information from the directors and executive officers with respect to related person transactions and for then determining, based on the facts and circumstances, whether we or a related person has a direct or indirect material interest in the transaction. As required under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), transactions that are determined to be directly or indirectly material to us or a related person are filed with the SEC when required, and disclosed in our proxy statement.

 

Our Conduct and Ethics Code prohibits conflicts of interest. Any waivers of these guidelines must be approved by the Board of Directors. Under the Conduct & Ethics Code, conflicts of interest occur when private or family interests interfere in any way, or even appear to interfere, with the interests of our Company. Our prohibition on conflicts of interest under the Conduct & Ethics Code includes related person transactions.

We have multiple processes for reporting conflicts of interests, including related person transactions. Under the Conduct & Ethics Code, all directors and employees are required to report any actual or apparent conflict of interest, or potential conflict of interest, to their supervisors. Any transaction involving related persons must be reported in writing by our division executives as part of their quarterly representation letter. This information is then reviewed by disinterested members of our Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee, our Board of Directors or our independent registered public accounting firm, as deemed appropriate, and discussed with management. As part of this review, the following factors are generally considered:

 

 

Ultimately, all material related party transactions must be approved or ratified by the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee of our Board of Directors. Any member of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee who is a related person with respect to a transaction is recused from the review of the transaction.

 

In addition, we annually distribute a questionnaire to our executive officers and members of our Board of Directors requesting certain information regarding, among other things, their immediate family members, employment and beneficial ownership interests. This information is then reviewed for any conflicts of interest under the Conduct & Ethics Code.

 

We also have other policies and procedures to prevent conflicts of interest, including related person transactions. For example, the charter of our Nominating & Governance Committee requires that the members of such committee assess the independence of the non-management directors at least annually, including a requirement that it determine whether or not any such directors have a material relationship with us, either directly or indirectly, as defined therein and as further described above under “— Director Independence.”

 

To establish restrictions with regard to corporate participation in the political system as imposed by law, the following guidelines are contained in our Conduct and Ethics Code:

 

 

The Board of Directors has established three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee.

Audit Committee

 

The Company’s Audit Committee presently consists of Messrs. Van Kleef, Nelson, Rosenthal and Seaver each of whom is independent, as such term is defined in Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and in the applicable NYSE listing standards. Mr. Rosenthal will be resigning from this committee and Mr. Swanson will become a member of the Audit Committee effective April 27, 2011. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter as amended and restated by the Board of Directors effective as of May 15, 2008. A copy of the charter is available on our website, www.oilstatesintl.com, by first clicking “Corporate Governance” and then “Audit Committee” under the Committee Charters heading on the right side of the page. The Audit Committee, which is chaired by Mr. Van Kleef, meets separately with representatives of the Company’s independent auditors, the Company’s internal audit personnel and with representatives of senior management in performing its functions. The Audit Committee reviews the general scope of audit coverages, the fees charged by the independent auditors, matters relating to internal control systems and other matters related to accounting and reporting functions. The Board of Directors has determined that all of the present members of the Audit Committee and Mr. Swanson are financially literate and that Messrs. Van Kleef, Nelson, Seaver and Swanson have accounting or related financial management expertise, each as required by the applicable NYSE listing standards. The Board of Directors has also determined that Messrs. Van Kleef, Nelson, Seaver and Swanson qualify as audit committee financial experts under the applicable rules of the Exchange Act.

 

In addition to serving on the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, Mr. Nelson also serves on the audit committees of Input/Output, Inc., W&T Offshore, Inc. and Genesis Energy LP. The charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors provides that no member of the Audit Committee may simultaneously serve on the audit committees of more than two other public companies. The Board of Directors has waived this limitation with respect to Mr. Nelson’s service on more than two other public company audit committees. Prior to granting this waiver, the Board of Directors considered the incremental time and responsibilities that such additional service would require of Mr. Nelson. Based upon a consideration of the facts and circumstances related to Mr. Nelson’s commitments and the entities on whose boards he serves, and including the fact that he is not currently serving in a full time executive role, the Board of Directors has determined that such additional service would not impair Mr. Nelson’s ability to effectively serve on the Company’s Audit Committee.

 

Compensation Committee

 

The Company’s Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. Rosenthal, Papa and Wells, each of whom is independent, as defined in the applicable NYSE listing standards, and is a non-employee director. The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter approved by the Board of Directors as amended and restated on May 15, 2008. A copy of the charter is available on our website, www.oilstatesintl.com, by first clicking “Corporate Governance” and then “Compensation Committee” under the Committee Charters heading on the right side of the page. The Compensation Committee, which is chaired by Mr. Rosenthal, administers the Oil States International, Inc. 2001 Equity Participation Plan (the “2001 Equity Participation Plan”), and in this capacity makes a recommendation to the full Board of Directors concerning all option grants or stock awards to employees, including executive officers, under the plan. In addition, the Compensation Committee is responsible for (i) making recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to the compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its other executive officers, (ii) establishing compensation and employee benefit policies and (iii) reviewing and discussing with our management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and related disclosure included in our annual proxy statement.

 

Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee

 

Our Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee consists of Messrs. Lambert, Papa and Wells, each of whom is independent, as such term is defined in the applicable NYSE listing standards. The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors as amended and restated as of May 15, 2008. A copy of the charter is available on our website, www.oilstatesintl.com, by first clicking “Corporate Governance” and then “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee” under the Committee Charters heading on the right side of the page. The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee, which is chaired by Mr. Papa, makes proposals to the Board of Directors for candidates to be nominated by the

Board of Directors to fill vacancies or for new directorship positions, if any, which may be created from time to time. The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee will consider suggestions from any source, particularly from stockholders, regarding possible candidates for director. To submit a recommendation to the committee, a stockholder should send a written request to the attention of the Company’s Secretary at Oil States International, Inc., Three Allen Center, 333 Clay Street, Suite 4620, Houston, Texas 77002. The written request must include the nominee’s name, contact information, biographical information and qualifications, as well as the nominee’s written consent to serve if elected. The request must also disclose the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by the person or group making the request, the period of time such person or group has owned those shares and the nature of any arrangement or agreement between the stockholder making a nomination and other parties with respect to the nomination. The request must be received by the Company no later than the 120th day before the anniversary of the date of the mailing of the prior year’s proxy, or December 17, 2011, for the 2012 Annual Shareholder’s Meeting. These procedures do not preclude a stockholder from making nominations in accordance with the process described below under “Stockholder Proposals.”

 

Committee Composition

 

Below is a summary of our committee structure and membership information.

 

 

 

Board of Directors and Committee Meetings

 

During 2010, the entire Board of Directors held nine meetings, the Audit Committee held six meetings, the Compensation Committee held five meetings and the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee held two meetings. Each of the directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board of Directors and the committees of the Board of Directors on which they served. All of our directors attended last year’s annual meeting. While we understand that scheduling conflicts may arise, we expect directors to make reasonable efforts to attend the annual meeting of stockholders and meetings of the Board of Directors and the committees on which they serve.

 

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that our non-employee directors shall meet separately in executive session at least annually. The director who presides at these sessions is the Chairman of the Board, assuming such person is a non-management director. Otherwise, the presiding director will be chosen by a vote of the non-management directors. In addition to the executive sessions of our non-management directors, our independent directors (as defined in the applicable NYSE listing standards) are required to meet in executive session at least annually. In the past year, our independent directors met in executive session several times. Our Chairman of the Board presided at these sessions.

Board of Directors Oversight of Enterprise Risk

 

The Board of Directors utilizes our Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) process to assist in fulfilling its oversight of our risks. Management, which is responsible for day-to-day risk management, conducts a risk assessment of Oil States’ business annually. The risk assessment process is global in nature and has been developed to identify and assess the Company’s risks, including the nature, materiality and velocity of the risk, as well as to identify steps to mitigate and manage each risk. Our key business leaders, functional heads and other managers are surveyed and/or interviewed to develop this information.

 

Risk oversight is a responsibility of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has delegated responsibility for monitoring certain enterprise risks to its standing committees.

 

The results of the risk assessment are reviewed with the full Board of Directors. The centerpiece of the assessment is the discussion of the key risks of Oil States, which includes the potential magnitude, likelihood of each risk and the speed with which the risk could impact the Company. As part of the process for each risk, management identifies the senior executive responsible for managing the risk, the potential impact and management’s initiatives to manage the risk.

 

The results of the risk assessment are considered in the Board of Directors’ processes. Risk discussions are integral to the Board of Directors and its committees’ deliberations.

 

Qualifications of Directors

 

When identifying director nominees, the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee will consider the following:

 

 

The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Directors believe the above mentioned attributes, along with the leadership skills and other experience of its Board of Directors members described below, provide the Company with the perspectives and judgment necessary to guide the Company’s strategies and monitor their execution.

 

The following table notes the breadth and variety of business experience that each of our directors brings to the Company.

 

In selecting nominees for the Board of Directors, the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee considers, among other things, the diversity of the Board of Directors in terms of educational background, business industry experience and knowledge of different geographic markets and oilfield services and products. In the case of current directors being considered for renomination, the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee will also take into account the director’s history of attendance at Board of Directors and committee meetings, the director’s tenure as a member of the Board of Directors and the director’s preparation for and participation in such meetings.

 

Director Nomination Process

 

Our director nomination process for new Board of Directors members is as follows:

 

 

The final candidate(s) are nominated by the Board of Directors or elected to fill a vacancy.

 

Communications with Directors

 

Stockholders or other interested parties may send communications, directly and confidentially, to the Board of Directors, to any committee of the Board of Directors, to non-management directors or any director in particular, by sending an envelope marked “confidential” to such person or persons c/o Oil Sates International, Inc., Three Allen Center, 333 Clay Street, Suite 4620, Houston, Texas 77002. Any such correspondence will be forwarded by the Secretary of the Company to the addressee without review by management.

 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 

During 2010, the Company’s Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. Rosenthal, Papa and Wells, each of whom is an independent, non-employee director. There were no compensation committee interlock relationships nor any insider participation in compensation arrangements for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors provides overall guidance to the Company’s executive compensation program and administers incentive compensation plans.

 

The executive compensation program includes three primary elements which are generally performance oriented and, taken together, constitute a flexible and balanced method of establishing total compensation for the Company’s executive officers. The three major elements consist of a) base salary, b) annual incentive plan awards, and c) long-term incentive awards. The design of this compensation program supports the Company’s executive total compensation philosophy.

 

Executive Total Compensation Philosophy

 

The Company’s philosophy regarding the executive compensation program for our named executive officers and other senior managers has been to design a compensation package that provides competitive base salary levels and compensation incentives that (i) attract and retain individuals of outstanding ability in these key positions, (ii) recognize corporate performance relative to established goals and the performance of the Company relative to the performance of other companies of comparable size, complexity and quality and against budget goals, and (iii) support both the short-term and long-term strategic goals of the Company. The Committee believes this approach closely links the compensation of the Company’s executives to the execution of the Company’s strategy and the accomplishment of Company goals that coincide with stockholder objectives.

 

Compensation Program Objectives:

 

 

The compensation program is designed to reward executives for long-term strategic management and the enhancement of stockholder value. We believe that the compensation program design and policies contribute to achievement of the Company’s objectives.

 

Compensation Benchmarking Relative to Market

 

The Compensation Committee establishes executive compensation primarily based on a review of the executive’s performance and compensation history and takes into account corporate performance. In the exercise of its duties, the Compensation Committee periodically benchmarks the Company’s executive compensation against that of comparable companies. The Compensation Committee considers the market to consist of both the oilfield services industry and geographic markets in which the Company competes for executive talent. Benchmark data is periodically obtained for a selected peer group approved by the Compensation Committee as well as for industry companies of comparable size. The Company currently uses the following benchmark companies: Complete Production Services, Inc., Core Laboratories N.V., Dril-Quip, Inc., Exterran Holdings, Inc., Global Industries Ltd., Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., Key Energy Services, Inc., Oceaneering International, Inc., Superior Energy Services, Inc. and Tidewater, Inc. Each of the benchmark companies at the time of selection had a market capitalization of between $1.5 and $4.5 billion, and each participates in the oilfield services industry with the Company.

 

The Compensation Committee reviews the compensation programs for comparable positions at similar corporations with which the Company competes for executive talent, and also considers relative internal equity within the executive pay structure. This approach allows the Compensation Committee to respond to changing business conditions, manage salaries and incentives more evenly over an individual’s career as well as minimize the

potential for automatic ratcheting-up of salaries and incentives that could occur with an inflexible and more narrowly defined approach.

 

In evaluating the comparison group data for compensation purposes, the Compensation Committee neither bases its decisions on quantitative relative weights of various factors, nor follows mathematical formulas. Rather, the Compensation Committee exercises its discretion and makes its judgment after considering the factors it deems relevant.

 

Elements of Compensation:

 

 

Mrs. Taylor provides the Compensation Committee with input regarding the performance of other Company executives and makes compensation recommendations with respect to these individuals. However, the Committee makes an independent judgment with respect to compensation levels for each of Mrs. Taylor’s direct reports.

 

 

 

The plan is flexible and provides the Compensation Committee the discretion to set goals and objectives with input from management that it believes are consistent with creating stockholder value and include financial measures, growth objectives, operating objectives, safety goals and other measures. Under the AICP, an incentive target percentage is established for each executive officer based upon, among other factors, the Compensation Committee’s review of publically available competitive compensation data for that position, level of responsibility and ability to impact the Company’s success. The AICP recognizes market differences in incentive award opportunities between organizational levels. Achieving results which exceed a minimum, or threshold, level of performance triggers an AICP payout. Performance results at or below the threshold (i.e. achieving a percentage

ranging from 75% to 85% of the related AICP performance objective or less) will result in no AICP award. The target represents achieving 100% of an executive officer’s AICP performance objective(s) as well as the targeted payout. Overachievement (i.e. achieving a percentage ranging from 120% to 125% of the related AICP performance objective) is the performance level at which incentive compensation is maximized. The 2010 award opportunities, expressed as a percentage of eligible AICP earnings, for the Named Executive Officers are outlined below:

 

 

As shown in the table above, the maximum AICP overachievement percentage is limited to twice the target level percentage which helps mitigate the potential for excessive risk taking. In addition, targets and goals are adjusted to incorporate acquisitions and major capital expenditures which also limits excessive risk taking.

 

At the beginning of each year, the Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing the AICP performance objectives based on recommendations by the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee sets performance goals that are both measurable and achievable. At the end of each year, the Compensation Committee reviews the performance results of the Company and the incentive awards to be paid to each executive officer and to all participants in the AICP. In its discretion, the Compensation Committee will interpret the plan and has authority to make adjustments in individual, business unit or Company-wide results in its discretion. The Compensation Committee did not make any discretionary changes to the 2010 incentive payouts to the Named Executive Officers.

 

Performance measures are selected and weighted by management and the Compensation Committee annually to give emphasis to performance for which participants have influence. The Compensation Committee has established “earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization” (“EBITDA”) as the primary corporate financial performance objective for each executive officer. In addition, a portion of the incentive potential for certain participants was based on return on investment (“ROI”) and, for certain of the executives other strategic goals as determined appropriate for the executives’ areas of responsibilities. Other strategic goals and objectives varied and included measures such as safety performance. Performance goals may be similar for all executives or may be different to reflect more appropriate measures of corporate and business unit performance. The EBITDA and ROI targets are generally set based on the Company or business unit annual budgeted financial statements which are approved by the Board of Directors. The relative percentages of EBITDA and ROI used to evaluate our executives are based upon the nature of each executive’s role in the Company and how that role relates to overall goals and performance of the Company. For example, for those divisions which have ROI criteria, executives responsible for the operation of those specific divisions or who have a significant impact over investment decisions with respect to such businesses have business-based or Company ROI as part of their performance measure if achievement of such measure is material to the Company’s performance. Executives who have less control over segment-based or Company ROI, have performance measures more heavily weighted towards EBITDA. We believe the use of tailored performance goals, which are closely aligned with drivers of the Company’s business, furthers our compensation objective of reinforcing the relationship between strong individual performance of executives and overall business performance. Individual objectives are tailored to match areas of direct responsibility and impact on outcome.

 

For 2010, Mr. Dodson and Mrs. Taylor had 90% of their incentive compensation based on the Company’s EBITDA and 10% of their incentive compensation based on the Company’s ROI. Mr. Moses’ incentive compensation was based 80% on Offshore Products’ EBITDA, 10% on Offshore Products’ ROI and 10% on the Company’s EBITDA. Mr. Green’s incentive compensation was based 10% on the Company’s EBITDA and the following PTI Group, Inc. metrics: 80% EBITDA and 10% ROI. Mr. Cragg’s incentive compensation was based on 40% on the Company’s EBITDA and 60% on the total of Tubular Services and Well Site Services EBITDA.

At the end of each year, the Compensation Committee reviews the performance results of the Company and the total incentive awards to be paid to each executive officer based on such officer’s success in achieving his AICP performance objectives.

 

All executive officers, including Mrs. Taylor, received incentive plan payments for 2010 performance, reflecting, in large part, the Company’s and most of its businesses’ strong overall performance versus budget. These incentive plan payments varied based upon Company and business unit achievement of the related goals and objectives. Twelve of fourteen business groupings of the Company, for AICP calculation purposes, including the consolidated group, exceeded their 2010 EBITDA objectives, and all of the Company’s executive officers received bonuses for 2010 in excess of target. On a consolidated basis, the Company overachieved its targets for 2010. Each of the Named Executive Officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, received the following payments in February 2011 under the AICP for fiscal 2010 performance.

 

 

Long-term Incentives — The Company makes certain stock-based awards under the 2001 Equity Participation Plan, which has been approved by stockholders, to better align the interests of executive officers with those of stockholders and to provide retention incentives. Specifically, the plan’s purposes are to:

 

 

The 2001 Equity Participation Plan provides for the grant of any combination of:

 

 

In determining appropriate awards, the Compensation Committee annually reviews each executive’s past performance, his or her ability to contribute to the future success and growth of the Company, time in the current job and competitive market data. The Compensation Committee also takes into account the risk of losing the executive to other employment opportunities and the value and potential for appreciation in the Company’s stock. The Compensation Committee believes that stock options and restricted stock grants, along with significant vesting requirements, are an effective method of reinforcing the long-term nature of the Company’s business and creating retention incentives. In addition, grants of stock options and/or restricted stock reinforce alignment with stockholder interests. The Compensation Committee considers the foregoing factors and any other relevant factors and makes a subjective determination with respect to awarding equity based compensation to its executive officers.

 

Under the 2001 Equity Participation Plan (“Plan”) the Company has only granted nonqualified stock options and time-vested restricted stock awards. The Company amended the Plan on March 31, 2009, to provide for

minimum vesting periods on restricted stocks and similar awards of one year for performance-based awards and three years for tenure based awards, except for a small percentage of the authorized shares under the Plan. As a result of this amendment, vesting may occur earlier than the minimum vesting periods with respect to no more than 10% of shares cumulatively authorized under the Plan. In excess of 99% of the options granted by the Compensation Committee vest at a rate of 25% per year over the first four years. Option lives range from six to ten years. Options are awarded at the NYSE’s closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant, or the last trading day if the award date is a date when markets are closed (“NYSE Closing Price”). The Compensation Committee has never granted options with an exercise price that is less than the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. The Compensation Committee has never repriced outstanding options. Any repricing of options under our Equity Participation Plan would require shareholder approval. Restricted stock awards, which are valued at the NYSE Closing Price, generally vest over a four year period at a rate of 25% per year; however, in special situations the Compensation Committee has approved awards with shorter vesting periods.

 

Higher-level positions will generally have a greater percentage of their total compensation based on longer-term incentives. The size of long-term incentive grants will vary from year to year and reflects a variety of factors including, among others, competitive market practices, retention priorities, total previous grants, current stock valuation, estimated future charges to earnings, and individual, business unit and company wide performance. The Compensation Committee determines the award level for executives, if any, on an annual basis usually at its February meeting each year.

 

The Company continues to incorporate a combination of both nonqualified stock options and restricted stock awards as the primary executive long-term incentive and retention tool. Awards are based on a number of factors, including, among others, the participant’s position, experience, base compensation, stock price and opportunity for advancement as well as any retention issues. Restricted stock awards offers the additional advantages of potentially reducing overall Company stock dilution, while improving the Company’s executive retention prospects in a very competitive labor market. We recognize that options alone may not have adequate retention value in an industry that has historically been cyclical in nature. The Compensation Committee weighs the cost of these grants with their potential benefit as an incentive, retention and compensation tool.

 

Restricted stock awards were made to Mrs. Taylor and Messrs. Dodson, Moses and Cragg on February 19, 2010 at the then fair market value of $37.67 per restricted share. Stock option awards were made to Mrs. Taylor and Messrs. Dodson, Moses, Green and Cragg on February 19, 2010 that had an exercise price of $37.67 per share based on the NYSE Closing Price and that had a Black Scholes fair market value on the date of grant of $17.12 per option award.

 

Other than Mr. Green, who only received a grant of stock options, each of the Named Executive Officers received both grants of stock options and restricted stock awards. During 2010, a total of 112,500 stock options and 43,500 shares of restricted stock awards were granted to the Named Executive Officers.

 

In administering the long-term incentive plan, the Compensation Committee is sensitive to the potential for dilution of future earnings per share. For this reason and because of other compensation design considerations, the Compensation Committee does not administer a broad-based stock program. Instead, the Compensation Committee focuses the long-term incentive plan on employees who will have the greatest impact on the strategic direction and long-term results of the Company by virtue of their senior roles and responsibilities.

 

Stock option grants and restricted stock awards are expensed to comply with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R — Share Based Payments (“FASB 123R”). There is no program, plan or practice to time the grant of stock options and award restricted stock to executives in coordination with material non-public information. Except in special circumstances, equity grants are made to employees annually at the time of the Board of Directors’ February meeting. Executive officers are prohibited from trading options or any derivative type of contract related to the Company’s stock.

Benefits

 

Employee benefits are designed to be broad based, competitive and to attract and retain employees. From time to time the Compensation Committee reviews plan updates and recommends that the Company implement certain changes to existing plans or adopt new benefit plans.

 

Health and Welfare Benefits

 

The Company offers a standard range of health and welfare benefits to all employees including executives. These benefits include: medical, prescription drug, vision and dental coverages, life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment, long-term disability insurance, flexible spending accounts, employee assistance, business travel accident insurance and 529 college savings plans. Executive officers make the same contributions for the same type of coverage and receive the same level of benefit as any other employee for each form of coverage / benefit.

 

Retirement Plans

 

The Company does not offer a defined benefit retirement plan. The Company does offer a defined contribution 401(k) retirement plan to substantially all of its U.S. employees. Participants may contribute from 1% to 50% of their base and cash incentive compensation (subject to IRS limitations), and the Company makes matching contributions under this plan on the first 6% of the participant’s compensation (100% match of the first 4% employee contribution and 50% match on the next 2% contribution). Company matching contributions vest at a rate of 20% per year for each of the employee’s first five years of service and then are immediately vested thereafter. A similar defined contribution retirement plan is in place and available to our Canadian employees, including Ron Green.

 

Deferred Compensation Plan

 

The Company maintains a nonqualified deferred compensation plan that permits eligible employees and directors to elect to defer all or a part of their cash compensation (base and/or incentives) from the Company until the termination of their status as an employee or director. A deferral election may provide for deferring different forms of compensation (base salary and/or incentive compensation) during the year. The Compensation Committee administers the plan. Participating employees are eligible to receive from the Company a matching deferral under the nonqualified deferred compensation plan that is intended to compensate them for contributions they could not receive from the Company under the 401(k) plan due to the various limits imposed on 401(k) plans by U.S. federal income tax laws. Directors who elect to participate in the nonqualified deferred compensation plan do not receive any matching contributions.

 

Participants in the nonqualified deferred compensation plan are able to invest contributions made to the nonqualified deferred compensation plan in investment funds selected by a Retirement Plan Compensation Committee which also mirrors the 401(k) plan investment funds. The Retirement Plan Compensation Committee is composed of employees. The Compensation Committee has established a grantor trust to hold the amounts deferred under the plan by the Company’s officers and directors. All amounts deferred under the plan remain subject to the claims of the Company’s creditors.

 

Allocation of net income (or net loss) in each participant’s account is divided into sub accounts to reflect each participant’s deemed investment designation in a particular fund(s). As of each valuation date, the net income (or net loss) of each fund is allocated among the corresponding sub accounts of the participants. Each sub account is credited with (or debited for) that portion of such net income (or net loss) due to the change in the value of each corresponding sub account from the prior valuation date.

 

Generally, each participant in the Deferred Compensation Plan will receive, at the participant’s election, a lump sum distribution or installment payments only upon termination of the participant’s service with the Company and its affiliates. For “Key Employees,” as defined in IRS regulations, distributions of deferrals made after 2004 are delayed at least six months. Any other withdrawals by the participant will be made in compliance with 409A limitations.

Canadian Retirement Savings Plan

 

In Canada, the Company contributes, on a matched basis, an amount up to 5% of each Canadian based, salaried employee’s (including the Canadian based NEO) base salary to the legislated maximum to a Defined Contribution Registered Pension Plan (“Retirement Savings Plan”) for the sole benefit of that employee. Contributions to the Retirement Savings Plan for the Canadian based NEO (as with all of the Canadian based salaried employees) is subject to the annual maximum Retirement Savings Plan contribution limit ($22,000 in 2010) set out in the Canadian Income Tax Act. Enrollment in the plan begins upon commencement of employment and contributions vest after two years of continuous service with the Company. Funds are paid by the Company to the third party Retirement Savings Plan administrator, Great West Life Assurance Company (“Great West Life”), and the funds are invested by Great West Life on behalf of the employee from within a broad range of investment options based on the instructions of each individual employee. Apart from the annual contributions, any growth in an individual’s Retirement Savings Plan is dependent upon the investment decisions made by that individual. The Company makes no investment decisions on behalf of the employee and has no obligations under the Retirement Savings Plan other than, in each year, to remit the defined contributions into each employee’s Retirement Savings Plan (including the Canadian based NEO’s Retirement Savings Plan) on that individuals behalf.

 

Other Perquisites and Personal Benefits

 

The Company does not offer any perquisites or other personal benefits to any executive with a value over $10,000 beyond those discussed above. Some executives do have Company paid club memberships, which are used for business purposes.

 

Compensation Consultant

 

The Committee, from time to time, utilizes consultants to provide independent advice on executive compensation matters and to perform specific project-related work. The consultants report directly to the Committee, which pre-approves the scope of the work and the fees charged. The Committee indicates to the consultants the role that management has in the analysis of executive compensation. In the past, consultants utilized by the Company have worked exclusively for the Committee on executive compensation projects and performed no other service for the Company. Fees paid to compensation consultants have never exceeded $120,000 per year.

 

Executive Compensation Policies

 

 

The Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines are calculated based on a multiple of the executive’s base salary, which is then converted to a fixed number of shares. Once the ownership guideline is established for an executive and communicated, the executive has four years to attain the targeted level of ownership. An executive’s ownership guideline does not automatically change as a result of changes in his or her base salary or fluctuations in Oil States common stock price. However, the Committee may, from time to time, reevaluate and revise participants’ guidelines to incorporate these types of events. An executive’s stock ownership guideline may also increase because of a change in title. The ownership guidelines for the senior executives are as follows:

 

Stock Ownership Level

 

 

Stock that counts toward satisfaction of the Company’s Stock Ownership Guidelines includes:

 

 

Covered executives are required to achieve their Stock Ownership Guideline within four years from inclusion in the program. All covered executives have achieved designated ownership requirements except for Mr. Green for whom the deadline has been extended due to the tax inefficiencies of issuing restricted stock in Canada. Once achieved, ownership of the guideline amount must be maintained for as long as the individual is subject to Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines.

 

Executive and Change of Control Agreements

 

The Company maintains Executive Agreements with seven executive officers subject to Section 16 of the Securities and Exchange Commission regulations. The Executive Agreements are not considered employment agreements and the executives are employed “at will” by the Company. These agreements provide protection in the event of (i) a qualified termination, which is defined as an involuntary termination of the executive officer by the Company other than for “Cause” or (ii) either an involuntary termination or a voluntary termination by the executive for “Good Reason” after a corporate “Change of Control” (as defined in each Executive Agreement) of the Company. The triggering events were selected due to the executive not having complete control of their circumstances. Executives are exercising control over their circumstances when they resign voluntarily without Good Reason or are terminated for Cause. As a result, these events do not trigger any payments.

 

If a qualified termination occurs other than during the 24-month period following a corporate Change of Control, the Executive Agreements provide for payments based on the executive officer’s base salary and target annual bonus amount, that all restrictions on restricted stock awards will lapse and for continued health benefits for 24 months. Any vested, non-qualified stock options would expire after 3 months of the date of termination if not exercised prior to their expiration.

 

The Change of Control provision in the Executive Agreement is intended to encourage continued employment by the Company of its executive officers and to allow such executive to be in a position to provide assessment and

advice to the Board of Directors regarding any proposed Change of Control without concern that such executive might be unduly distracted by the uncertainties and risks created by a proposed Change of Control. Unlike “single trigger” plans that pay out immediately upon a change of control, the Company’s agreement requires a “double trigger” (i.e. a change of control along with an involuntary loss of employment). If the qualified termination occurs during the 24-month period following a corporate Change of Control, the agreements provide for a lump sum payment to the executive officer based on the executive officer’s base salary and target annual incentive amount. In addition, with respect to such a qualified termination, the agreements provide that all restricted stock awards will become vested, that all restrictions on such awards will lapse and that outstanding stock options will vest and, will remain exercisable for the remainder of their terms. The executive officer will also be entitled to health benefits for 36 months, vesting of all deferred compensation amounts and outplacement services. Executive agreements entered into prior to 2010 entitle the executive to be made whole for any excise taxes incurred with respect to severance payments that are in excess of the limits set forth under the Internal Revenue Code. Executive agreements entered into subsequent to 2009 do not contain excise tax gross up protection. See “Potential Payments Under Termination or Change of Control” in this Proxy Statement for additional disclosures of severance and Change of Control payments for Named Executive Officers.

 

The Executive Agreements have a term of three years and are extended automatically for one additional day on a daily basis for a period of three years, unless notice of non-extension is given by the Board of Directors of the Company, in which case the agreement will terminate on the third anniversary of the date notice is given. To receive benefits under the Executive Agreement, the executive officer will be required to execute a release of all claims against the Company. Certain terms of the Executive Agreements are summarized below.

 

Cindy B. Taylor.  Under the terms of Mrs. Taylor’s Executive Agreement, she will be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to two and a half times her base salary and target annual incentive amount if a qualified termination occurs during the 24-month period following a corporate Change of Control. If a qualified termination occurs other than during the 24-month period following a corporate Change of Control, Mrs. Taylor will be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to one and a half times her base salary and target annual incentive amount.

 

All Other Section 16 Executive Officers.  Under the terms of each of their Executive Agreements, the executive officer will be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to two times his base salary and target annual incentive amount if a qualified termination occurs during the 24-month period following a corporate Change of Control. If a qualified termination occurs other than during the 24-month period following a Change of Control, the executive officer will be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to his base salary and target annual incentive amount.

 

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis filed in this document. The Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Proxy Statement and annual report.

 

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

 

Gary L. Rosenthal, Chairman
Mark G. Papa
Stephen A. Wells

 

The table below summarizes the total compensation paid or earned by the Named Executive Officers for each fiscal year in the three year period ended December 31, 2010. The Company has not entered into any employment agreements with any of the Named Executive Officers. When setting total compensation for each of the Named Executive Officers, the Committee reviews tally sheets which show the executive’s current compensation, including equity and non-equity based compensation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Each of the Named Executive Officers is party to an Executive Agreement, which are not considered employment agreements. For a description of these agreements, please see “Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive and Change of Control Agreements.” The compensation amounts described in the preceding tables were determined as described under “Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation.”

 

The following table provides information about equity and non-equity awards granted to Named Executive Officers in 2010: (1) the grant date; (2) the estimated future payouts under the non-equity incentive plan, which is discussed in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Annual Cash Incentive Compensation”, included herein; (3) the number of restricted stock awards pursuant to the Company’s 2001 Equity Participation Plan; (4) the number of stock option awards, which consist of the number of shares underlying stock options awarded, pursuant to the Company’s 2001 Equity Participation Plan; (5) the exercise price of the stock option awards, which reflects the NYSE Closing Price on grant date; and (6) the fair value of each equity award computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Codification Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation as of the grant date.

 

 

 

 

The following table provides information on the holdings of stock options and stock awards by the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2010. This table includes unexercised and unvested option awards and unvested stock awards. Each equity grant is shown separately for each Named Executive Officer. The vesting schedule for each grant is shown following this table, based on the option or stock award grant date or other factors, as discussed. The market value of the stock awards is based on the closing market price of the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2010, which was $64.09. For additional information about the option awards and stock awards, see the description of equity incentive compensation in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”, included herein.

 

 

 

The following table provides information for the Named Executive Officers on (1) stock option exercises during 2010, including the number of shares acquired upon exercise and the value realized and (2) the number of shares acquired upon the vesting of stock awards and the value realized, each before payment of any applicable withholding tax.

 

 

 

 

The table below provides information relating to our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2010:

 

 

Our 2001 Equity Participation Plan has been approved by our stockholders.

 

Deferred Compensation Plan and Canadian Deferred Retirement Savings Plan

 

The Company maintains a nonqualified deferred compensation plan for U.S. citizens that permits our directors and eligible employees to elect to defer all or a part of their cash compensation (base and/or incentive pay) from us until the termination of their status as a director or employee. In Canada, the Company maintains a similar plan in which Mr. Green is a participant. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Deferred Compensation Plan”, included herein, for details about the plans.

 

The investment options currently available to an executive under the Deferred Compensation Plan are the same mutual funds available to all employees under the Company’s 401(K) Retirement Plan.

 

Detailed below is activity in the Deferred Compensation Plan for each Named Executive Officer. Mr. Green is a Canadian citizen based in Edmonton, Canada and is not eligible to participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan; however, he does participate in a similar Canadian Deferred Retirement Savings Plan.

 

 

 

 

The table below reflects the amount of compensation to each of the Named Executive Officers of the Company in the event of either (i) an involuntary, not for Cause termination of such executive’s employment or (ii) a termination following a change of control (see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive and Change of Control Agreements” herein; such Executive and Change of Control Agreements are referred to herein as “Executive Agreements”). The scope and terms of compensation due to each Named Executive Officer upon voluntary terminations, early retirement, retirement, for cause termination and in the event of disability or death of the executive are the same as for all salaried employees. The amounts shown in the table assume that such termination was effective as of December 31, 2010 and, therefore, include compensation earned through such time and are estimates of the amounts which would be paid out to the executives upon their terminations. The actual amounts to be paid can only be determined at the time of such executive’s separation from the Company.

 

The following table shows the potential payments upon termination or a “Change of Control” of the Company, as defined in her Executive Agreement, for Cindy B. Taylor, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. Per Mrs. Taylor’s Executive Agreement, if Mrs. Taylor is terminated following a Change of Control (other than termination by the Company for Cause, as defined in the agreement, or by reason of death or disability), or if Mrs. Taylor voluntarily terminates her employment for “Good Reason”, as defined in the agreement, during the 24-month period following a corporate Change of Control, she is entitled to receive a lump sum severance payment of two and one half times the sum of her base salary and the target annual bonus earned by her pursuant to the annual incentive compensation plan. If Mrs. Taylor is terminated by the Company not for Cause without a Change of Control, she is entitled to receive a lump sum severance payment of one and a half times the sum of her base salary and the target annual bonus earned by her pursuant to the annual incentive compensation plan.

 

Pursuant to the other Named Executive Officers’ Executive Agreements, if any of them is terminated following a Change of Control (other than termination by the Company for Cause, as defined in the agreement, or by reason of death or disability), or if any of them voluntarily terminate their employment for “Good Reason”, as defined in the agreement, during the 24-month period following a corporate Change of Control, then the affected Named Executive Officer is entitled to receive a lump sum severance payment of two times the sum of his base salary and the target annual bonus earned by him pursuant to the annual incentive compensation plan. If any of them are terminated by the Company not for Cause without a Change of Control, he is entitled to receive a lump sum severance payment of one times the sum of his base salary and the target annual bonus earned by him pursuant to the annual incentive compensation plan.

 

Generally, each participant in the Deferred Compensation Plan will receive, at the participant’s election, a lump sum distribution or installment payments only upon termination of the participant’s service with the Company and its affiliates. For “Key Employees,” as defined in IRS regulations, distributions of deferrals made after 2004 are delayed at least six months. Any other withdrawals by the participant will be made in good faith compliance with 409A limitations.

 

Shown in the table below are potential payments upon the assumed involuntary not for Cause termination of the named executive officers and upon an involuntary not for Cause termination following a Change of Control of the Company as of December 31, 2010. Only one of the named executive officers’ potential payments as of

December 31, 2010 would trigger a gross up payment for excise taxes that would be reimbursed under their Executive Agreement.