e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011.
Or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
No. 000-19028
(Commission file number)
CCFNB BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
PENNSYLVANIA
|
|
23-2254643 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
232 East Street, Bloomsburg, PA
|
|
17815 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (570) 784-4400
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o
No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of larger accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.) Yes o No þ
On May 2, 2011, there were 2,229,791 shares of the Registrants common stock outstanding, par value
$1.25.
CCFNB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Index to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page Number |
Part I Financial Information |
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010 |
|
|
3 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31,
2011 and 2010 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity (unaudited) for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
|
|
35 |
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part II Other Information |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
|
|
35 |
|
Item 1A. Risk Factors |
|
|
35 |
|
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
|
|
36 |
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
|
|
36 |
|
Item 5. Other Information |
|
|
36 |
|
Item 6. Exhibits |
|
|
36 |
|
Signatures |
|
|
37 |
|
Exhibits |
|
|
38 |
|
2
PART I Financial Information
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
CCFNB Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
6,696 |
|
|
$ |
7,263 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
|
|
24,783 |
|
|
|
18,683 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
1,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
32,951 |
|
|
|
27,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities, available for sale, at fair value |
|
|
204,238 |
|
|
|
207,173 |
|
Restricted securities, at cost |
|
|
2,863 |
|
|
|
3,012 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
343,381 |
|
|
|
340,453 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
4,858 |
|
|
|
4,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net |
|
|
338,523 |
|
|
|
335,652 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
12,043 |
|
|
|
11,992 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
1,632 |
|
Cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
12,075 |
|
|
|
11,942 |
|
Investment in limited partnerships |
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
1,607 |
|
Intangible Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit |
|
|
2,065 |
|
|
|
2,192 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
7,937 |
|
|
|
7,937 |
|
Prepaid FDIC assessment |
|
|
1,352 |
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
2,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
620,106 |
|
|
$ |
614,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
416,893 |
|
|
$ |
410,915 |
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
65,574 |
|
|
|
62,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
482,467 |
|
|
|
473,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
55,060 |
|
|
|
58,759 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
6,122 |
|
|
|
6,123 |
|
Junior subordinate debentures |
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
4,640 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
2,682 |
|
|
|
2,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
|
551,563 |
|
|
|
546,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $1.25 per share; authorized
5,000,000 shares; issued 2,290,791 shares
in 2011 and 2,286,931 shares in 2010 |
|
|
2,864 |
|
|
|
2,859 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
28,076 |
|
|
|
27,964 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
37,317 |
|
|
|
36,397 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
1,873 |
|
|
|
2,221 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 61,000 shares in 2011 and 2010 |
|
|
(1,587 |
) |
|
|
(1,587 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
68,543 |
|
|
|
67,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
620,106 |
|
|
$ |
614,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
CCFNB Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
$ |
4,448 |
|
|
$ |
4,677 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
Interest and dividends on investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
|
1,861 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
Dividend and other interest income |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Deposits in other banks |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME |
|
|
6,332 |
|
|
|
6,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
1,537 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
Junior subordinate debentures |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE |
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
4,961 |
|
|
|
5,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION
FOR LOAN LOSSES |
|
|
4,881 |
|
|
|
4,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges and fees |
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
Gain on sale of loans |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
Brokerage |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
Trust |
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
Interchange fees |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
Other |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL NON-INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
1,657 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
Employee benefits |
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
State shares tax |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
Directors fees |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
FDIC assessments |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Telecommunications |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Amortization of core deposit intangible |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
Automated teller machine and interchange |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Other |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL NON-INTEREST EXPENSE |
|
|
4,144 |
|
|
|
3,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION |
|
|
2,165 |
|
|
|
2,090 |
|
INCOME TAX PROVISION |
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
1,610 |
|
|
$ |
1,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH DIVIDENDS PER SHARE |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING |
|
|
2,226,195 |
|
|
|
2,243,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
CCFNB Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
(In Thousands Except Per Share Data) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Surplus |
|
|
Earnngs |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
2,270,850 |
|
|
$ |
2,838 |
|
|
$ |
27,539 |
|
|
$ |
32,723 |
|
|
$ |
2,523 |
|
|
$ |
(537 |
) |
|
$ |
65,086 |
|
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,540 |
|
Change in net unrealized gain on
investment securities available-for-sale,
net of reclassification adjustment and
tax effects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issuance under dividend
reinvestment and stock purchase plans |
|
|
4,140 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
Recognition of employee stock purchase
plan expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock (17,500 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(474 |
) |
|
|
(474 |
) |
Cash dividends, ($0.29 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(650 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(650 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2010 |
|
|
2,274,990 |
|
|
$ |
2,844 |
|
|
$ |
27,646 |
|
|
$ |
33,613 |
|
|
$ |
2,871 |
|
|
$ |
(1,011 |
) |
|
$ |
65,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
|
|
2,286,931 |
|
|
$ |
2,859 |
|
|
$ |
27,964 |
|
|
$ |
36,397 |
|
|
$ |
2,221 |
|
|
$ |
(1,587 |
) |
|
$ |
67,854 |
|
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
Change in net unrealized gain on
investment securities available-for-sale,
net of reclassification adjustment and
tax effects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issuance under dividend
reinvestment and stock purchase plans |
|
|
3,860 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
Recognition of employee stock purchase
plan expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Cash dividends, ($0.31 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2011 |
|
|
2,290,791 |
|
|
$ |
2,864 |
|
|
$ |
28,076 |
|
|
$ |
37,317 |
|
|
$ |
1,873 |
|
|
$ |
(1,587 |
) |
|
$ |
68,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
CCFNB Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For The Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,610 |
|
|
$ |
1,540 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
Amortization and accretion on investment securities |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
Deferred income taxes (benefit) provision |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
44 |
|
Gain on sale of loans |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(130 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans |
|
|
7,305 |
|
|
|
4,561 |
|
Originations of mortgage loans held for resale |
|
|
(8,202 |
) |
|
|
(4,815 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles and invesment in limited partnerships |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
(Increase) Decrease in accrued interest receivable |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
103 |
|
Increases in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(141 |
) |
Decrease in accrued interest payable |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(1,085 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
(20,044 |
) |
|
|
(5,118 |
) |
Proceeds from sales, maturities and redemptions |
|
|
22,048 |
|
|
|
29,102 |
|
Proceeds from redemption of restricted securities |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of restricted securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(184 |
) |
Net increase in loans |
|
|
(1,893 |
) |
|
|
(6,905 |
) |
Acquisition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
16,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits |
|
|
8,675 |
|
|
|
5,968 |
|
Net decrease in short-term borrowings |
|
|
(3,699 |
) |
|
|
(2,747 |
) |
Repayment of long-term borrowings |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(5,001 |
) |
Acquisition of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(474 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(690 |
) |
|
|
(650 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities |
|
|
4,401 |
|
|
|
(2,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
5,356 |
|
|
|
14,903 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
27,595 |
|
|
|
11,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
32,951 |
|
|
$ |
26,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
1,431 |
|
|
$ |
1,887 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
Loans transferred to other real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
6
CCFNB BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting and reporting policies of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc. (the Corporation) are in
accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and
conform to common practices within the banking industry. The more significant policies follow:
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc. and its
wholly-owned subsidiary, First Columbia Bank & Trust Co. (the Bank). Columbia Financial
Corporation (CFC), the former parent company of the Bank was acquired by CCFNB Bancorp, Inc. on
July 18, 2008 and Columbia County Farmers National Bank (CCFNB) merged with and into the Bank on
July 18, 2008. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
NATURE OF OPERATIONS
The Corporation is a financial holding company that provides full service banking, including
trust services, through the Bank, to individuals and corporate customers. The Bank has fourteen
offices covering an area of approximately 752 square miles in Northcentral Pennsylvania. The
Corporation and Bank are subject to the regulation of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking, the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
Procuring deposits and making loans are the major lines of business. The deposits are mainly
deposits of individuals and small businesses and include various types of checking accounts,
statement savings, money market accounts, interest checking accounts, individual retirement
accounts, and certificates of deposit. The Bank also offers non-insured Repo sweep accounts.
Lending products include commercial, consumer, and mortgage loans. The trust services, trading
under the name of B.B.C.T., Co. include administration of various estates, pension plans,
self-directed IRAs and other services. A third-party brokerage arrangement is also resident in
the Lightstreet branch. This investment center offers a full line of stocks, bonds and other
non-insured financial services.
SEGMENT REPORTING
The Bank acts as an independent community financial services provider, and offers traditional
banking and related financial services to individual, business and government customers. Through
its branch, remote capture, internet banking, telephone and automated teller machine network, the
Bank offers a full array of commercial and retail financial services, including the taking of time,
savings and demand deposits; the making of commercial, consumer and mortgage loans; and the
providing of other financial services. The Bank also performs personal, corporate, pension and
fiduciary services through its B.B.C.T., Co. as well as offers diverse investment products through
its investment center.
Management does not separately allocate expenses, including the cost of funding loan demand,
between the commercial, retail, trust and investment center operations of the Corporation. As
such, discrete financial information is not available and segment reporting would not be
meaningful.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of these consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ significantly from
those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant changes
include the assessment for impairment of certain investment securities, the allowance for loan
losses, deferred tax assets and liabilities, impairment of other intangible assets, and other real
estate owned. Assumptions and factors used in the estimates are evaluated on an annual basis or
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the previous assumptions and factors have
changed. The result of the analysis could result in adjustments to the estimates.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The Corporation classifies its investment securities as either held-to-maturity or
available-for-sale at the time of purchase. Debt securities are classified as held-to-maturity
when the Corporation has the ability and positive intent to hold the securities to maturity.
Investment securities held-to-maturity are carried at cost adjusted for amortization of premiums
and accretion of discounts to maturity.
Debt securities not classified as held-to-maturity and equity securities included in the
available-for-sale category are carried at fair value, and the amount of any unrealized gain or
loss net of the effect of deferred income taxes is reported as other comprehensive income in the
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity. Managements decision to sell
available-for-sale securities is based on changes in economic conditions controlling the sources
and uses of funds, terms, availability of and yield of alternative investments, interest rate risk,
and the need for liquidity.
7
The cost of debt securities classified as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale is adjusted
for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such amortization and
accretion, as well as interest and dividends, is included in interest income from investments.
Realized gains and losses are included in net investment securities gains. The cost of investment
securities sold, redeemed or matured is based on the specific identification method.
RESTRICTED SECURITIES
Restricted equity securities consist of stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh
(FHLB Pittsburgh), and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank (ACBB) and do not have a readily
determinable fair value because their ownership is restricted, and they can be sold back only to
the FHLB-Pittsburgh, ACBB or to another member institution. Therefore, these securities are
classified as restricted equity investment securities, carried at cost, and evaluated for
impairment. At March 31, 2011, the Corporation held $2,828,000 in stock of the FHLB-Pittsburgh and
$35,000 in stock of ACBB. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation held $2,977,000 in stock of
FHLB-Pittsburgh and $35,000 in stock of ACBB.
The Corporation evaluated its holding of restricted stock for impairment and deemed the stock
to not be impaired due to the expected recoverability of par value, which equals the value
reflected within the Corporations financial statements. The decision was based on several items
ranging from the estimated true economic losses embedded within FHLBs mortgage portfolio to the
FHLBs liquidity position and credit rating. The Corporation utilizes the impairment framework
outlined in GAAP to evaluate stock for impairment. The following factors were evaluated to
determine the ultimate recoverability of the par value of the Corporations restricted stock
holdings; (i) the significance of the decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the capital
stock amount for the FHLB and the length of time this situation has persisted; (ii) commitments by
the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation
to the operating performance of the FHLB; (iii) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on
the institutions and, accordingly, on the customer base of the FHLB; (iv) the liquidity position of
the FHLB; and (v) whether a decline is temporary or whether it affects the ultimate recoverability
of the FHLB stock based on (a) the materiality of the carrying amount to the member institution and
(b) whether an assessment of the institutions operational needs for the foreseeable future allow
management to dispose of the stock. Based on the analysis of these factors, the Corporation
determined that its holding of restricted stock was not impaired at March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010.
LOANS
Loans are stated at their outstanding principal balances, net of deferred fees or costs,
unearned income, and the allowance for loan losses. Interest on loans is accrued on the principal
amount outstanding, primarily on an actual day basis. Non-refundable loan fees and certain direct
costs are deferred and amortized over the life of the loans using the interest method. The
amortization is reflected as an interest yield adjustment, and the deferred portion of the net fees
and costs is reflected as a part of the loan balance.
Real estate mortgage loans held for resale are carried at the lower of cost or market on an
aggregate basis. A portion of these loans are sold with limited recourse by the Corporation.
Generally, a loan is classified as non-accrual, with the accrual of interest on such a loan
discontinued when the contractual payment of principal or interest has become 90-days past due or
management has serious doubts about further collectibility of principal or interest, even though
the loan may be currently performing. A loan may remain on accrual status if it is in the process
of collection and is either guaranteed or well-secured. When a loan is placed on non-accrual
status, unpaid interest credited to income in the current year is reversed, and unpaid interest
accrued in prior years is charged against the allowance for loan losses. Certain non-accrual loans
may continue to perform wherein payments are still being received with those payments generally
applied to principal. Non-accrual loans remain under constant scrutiny and if performance
continues, interest income may be recorded on a cash basis based on managements judgment as to
collectibility of principal.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable
that the Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms
of the loan agreement. Under current accounting standards, the allowance for loan losses related
to impaired loans is based on discounted cash flows using the loans effective interest rate or the
fair value of the collateral for certain collateral dependent loans. The recognition of interest
income on impaired loans is the same as for non-accrual loans discussed above.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The allowance for loan losses is established through provisions for loan losses charged
against income. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan
losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level established by management to be
adequate to absorb estimated potential loan losses. Managements periodic evaluation of the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based on the Corporations past loan loss experience,
known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers
ability to repay (including the timing of future payments), the estimated value of any underlying
collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions, and other relevant
factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates, including the
amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans that may be
susceptible to significant change.
In addition, the Bank is subject to periodic examination by its federal and state examiners,
and may be required by such regulators to recognize additions to the allowance for loan losses
based on their assessment of credit information available to them at the time of their
examinations.
In addition, an allowance is provided for possible credit losses on off-balance sheet credit
exposures. The allowance is estimated by management and is classified in other liabilities.
8
The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to
loans that are individually classified as impaired. At the present time, select loans are not
aggregated for collective impairment evaluation, as such; all loans are subject to individual
impairment evaluation should the facts and circumstances pertinent to a particular loan suggest
that such evaluation is necessary. Factors considered by management in determining impairment
include payment status and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments
when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are
not classified as impaired. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and
events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal
or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Management
determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis,
taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including
the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrowers prior payment record, and the
amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. If a loan is impaired, a
portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of
estimated future cash flows using the loans existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if
repayment is expected solely from collateral. Troubled debt restructurings are separately
identified for impairment disclosures and are measured at the present value of estimated future
cash flows using the loans effective rate at inception. If a trouble debt restructuring is
considered to be a collateral dependent loan, the loan is reported, net, at the fair value of the
collateral. For troubled debt restructurings that subsequently default, the Bank determines the
amount of reserve in accordance with the accounting policy for the allowance for loan losses.
The general component covers all other loans not identified as impaired and is based on
historical losses adjusted for current factors. The historical loss component of the allowance is
determined by losses recognized by portfolio segment over the preceding two years. In calculating
the historical component of our allowance, we aggregate our loans into one of four portfolio
segments: Commercial, Financial & Agriculture, Commercial Real Estate, Consumer Real Estate, and
Installment Loans to Individuals. Risk factors impacting loans in each of the portfolio segments
include broad deterioration of property values, reduced consumer and business spending as a result
continued high unemployment and reduced credit availability and lack of confidence in a sustainable
recovery. Actual loss experience is supplemented with other economic factors based on the risks
present for each portfolio segment. These economic factors include consideration of the following:
the concentration of watch and substandard loans as a percentage of total loans, levels of loan
concentration within the portfolio segment or division of a portfolio segment and broad economic
conditions.
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation computed principally
on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Maintenance and minor
repairs are charged to operations as incurred. The cost and accumulated depreciation of the
premises and equipment retired or sold are eliminated from the property accounts at the time of
retirement or sale, and the resulting gain or loss is reflected in current operations.
MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS
The Bank originates and sells real estate loans to investors in the secondary mortgage market.
After the sale, the Bank retains the right to service most of these loans. When originated
mortgage loans are sold and servicing is retained, a servicing asset is capitalized based on
relative fair value at the date of sale. Servicing assets are amortized as an offset to other fees
in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing income. The unamortized cost is
included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The servicing rights are
periodically evaluated for impairment based on their relative fair value.
JUNIOR SUBORDINATE DEBENTURES
During 2006, CFC issued $4,640,000 in junior debentures due December 15, 2036 to Columbia
Financial Statutory Trust I (Trust). On July 18, 2008, the Corporation became the successor to CFC
and to this Trust, respectively. The Corporation owns all of the $140,000 in common equity of the
Trust and the debentures are the sole asset of the Trust. The Trust, a wholly-owned unconsolidated
subsidiary of the Corporation, issued $4,500,000 of floating-rate trust capital securities in a
non-public offering in reliance on Section 4 (2) of the Securities Act of 1933. The floating-rate
capital securities provide for quarterly distributions at a variable annual coupon rate, reset
quarterly, based on the 3-month LIBOR plus 1.75%. The coupon rate was 2.06% at March 31, 2011.
The securities are callable by the Corporation, subject to any required regulatory approval, at
par, after five years. The Corporation unconditionally guarantees the trust capital securities.
The terms of the junior subordinated debentures and the common equity of the trust mirror the terms
of the trust capital securities issued by the Trust.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS GOODWILL
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair market value of net assets
acquired. The Corporation has recorded net goodwill of $7,937,000 at March 31, 2011 and December
31, 2010 related to the 2008 acquisition of Columbia Financial Corporation and its subsidiary,
First Columbia Bank & Trust Co. In accordance with current accounting standards, goodwill is not
amortized. Management performs an annual evaluation for impairment. Any impairment of goodwill
results in a charge to income. The Corporation periodically assesses whether events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of goodwill and other intangible assets may be
impaired. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level and an impairment loss is
recorded to the extent that the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. The
Company employs general industry
practices in evaluating the impairment of its goodwill and other intangible assets. The Company
calculates the value of goodwill using a combination of the following valuation methods: dividend
discount analysis under the income approach, which calculates the present value of all excess cash
flows plus the present value of a terminal value, the price/earnings multiple under the market
approach and the
9
change in control premium to market price approach. Based upon these reviews,
management determined there was no impairment of goodwill during 2011 or 2010. No assurance can be
given that future impairment tests will not result in a charge to earnings.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS CORE DEPOSIT
The Corporation has an amortizable intangible asset related to the deposit premium paid for
the acquisition of Columbia Financial Corporations subsidiary, First Columbia Bank & Trust Co.
This intangible asset is being amortized on a sum of the years digits method over 10 years and has
a carrying value of $2,065,000 as of March 31, 2011. At December 31, 2010, the intangible asset had
a carrying value of $2,192,000. The recoverability of the carrying value is evaluated on an
ongoing basis, and permanent declines in value, if any, are charged to expense. Amortization of
the core deposit intangible amounted to $127,000 and $151,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2011 and 2010, respectively.
The estimated amortization expense of the core deposit intangible over its remaining life is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended: |
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2011 |
|
$ |
382,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
442,000 |
|
2013 |
|
|
374,000 |
|
2014 |
|
|
308,000 |
|
2015 |
|
|
240,000 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
319,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,065,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED
Real estate properties acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and
are initially recorded at fair value on the date of foreclosure establishing a new cost basis.
After foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the real estate is
carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell and is included in other
assets. Revenues derived from and costs to maintain the assets and subsequent gains and losses on
sales are included in other non-interest income and expense. There was no other real estate owned
as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
BANK OWNED LIFE INSURANCE
The Corporation invests in Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI). Purchase of BOLI provides life
insurance coverage on certain present and retired employees and Directors with the Corporation
being owner and primary beneficiary of the policies.
INVESTMENTS IN LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS
The Corporation is a limited partner in four partnerships at March 31, 2011 that provide low
income housing in the Corporations geographic market area. The investments are accounted for
under the effective yield method. Under the effective yield method, the Corporation recognizes tax
credits as they are allocated and amortizes the initial cost of the investment to provide a
constant effective yield over the period that the tax credits are allocated to the Corporation.
Under this method, the tax credits allocated, net of any amortization of the investment in the
limited partnerships, are recognized in the consolidated statements of income as a component of
income tax expense. The amount of tax credits allocated to the Corporation was $158,000 and the
amortization of the investments in limited partnerships was $38,000 and $41,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The carrying value of the Corporations
investments in limited partnerships was $1,568,000 at March 31, 2011 and $1,607,000 at December 31,
2010.
INVESTMENT IN INSURANCE AGENCY
The Corporation owns a 50 percent interest in a local insurance agency, a corporation
organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The income or loss from this
investment is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The carrying value of this
investment as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $232,000, and is included in other assets
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes is based on the results of operations, adjusted primarily for
tax-exempt income. Certain items of income and expense are reported in different periods for
financial reporting and tax return purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined
based on the differences between the consolidated financial statement and income tax basis of
assets and liabilities measured by using the enacted tax rates and laws expected to be in effect
when the timing differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax expense or benefit is based on
the difference between deferred tax asset or liability from period to period.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The
ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable
income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management
considers the
10
scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, the projected future taxable income
and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces
deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is more likely than not that the tax
position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur.
The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being
realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the more likely than not test, no tax
benefit is recorded.
The Corporation and the Bank are subject to U.S. federal income tax and Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania tax. The Corporation is no longer subject to examination by Federal or State taxing
authorities for the years before 2007. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 the Corporation did
not have any unrecognized tax benefits. The Corporation does not expect the amount of any
unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase in the next twelve months. The Corporation
recognizes interest related to income tax matters as interest expense and penalties related to
income tax matters as other noninterest expense. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the
Corporation does not have any amounts accrued for interest and/or penalties.
PER SHARE DATA
Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number
of shares of common stock outstanding at the end of each period. Diluted earnings per share are
calculated by increasing the denominator for the assumed conversion of all potentially dilutive
securities. The Corporation does not have any securities which have or will have a dilutive
effect, so accordingly, basic and diluted per share data are the same.
CASH FLOW INFORMATION
For purposes of reporting consolidated cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on
hand and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in other banks and federal funds sold. The
Corporation considers cash classified as interest-bearing deposits with other banks as a cash
equivalent because they are represented by cash accounts essentially on a demand basis. Federal
funds are also included as a cash equivalent because they are generally purchased and sold for
one-day periods.
TREASURY STOCK
The purchase of the Corporations common stock is recorded at cost. At the date of subsequent
reissue, the treasury stock account is reduced by the cost of such stock on a last-in first-out
basis.
TRUST ASSETS AND INCOME
Property held by the Corporation in a fiduciary or agency capacity for its customers is not
included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements because such items are not assets of
the Corporation and the Bank. Trust Department income is generally recognized on a cash basis and
is not materially different than if it was reported on an accrual basis.
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The Corporation is required to present accumulated other comprehensive income in a full set of
general-purpose financial statements for all periods presented. Accumulated other comprehensive
income is comprised of net unrealized holding gains on the available for sale investment securities
portfolio. The Corporation has elected to report the effects of other comprehensive income as part
of the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity.
ADVERTISING COSTS
It is the Corporations policy to expense advertising costs in the period in which they are
incurred. Advertising expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was approximately
$45,000 and $46,000, respectively.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
FASB ASU 2010-20, Receivable (Topic 310), Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing
Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses ASU 2010-20 requires new and enhanced
disclosures about the credit quality of an entitys financing receivables and its allowance for
credit losses. The new and amended disclosure requirements focus on such areas as nonaccrual and
past due financing receivables, allowance for credit losses related to financing receivables,
impaired loans, credit quality information and modifications. The ASU requires an entity to
disaggregate new and existing disclosures based on how it develops its allowance for credit losses
and how it manages credit exposures. For public entities, the disclosures as of the end of a
reporting period were effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after
December 15, 2010. The disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period were
effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. See
Note 3.
FASB ASU 2010-09 Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and
Disclosure requirements.
This accounting standard update modifies the requirement to disclose the date that subsequent
events are considered through for SEC filers. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to
disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change alleviates
potential conflicts between Subtopic 855-10 and the SECs requirements.
FASB ASC 860 In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance impacting FASB ASC 860, Transfers
and servicing (Statement No. 166 Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 140). The new guidance
11
removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose
entity and limits the circumstances in which a financial asset, or portion of a financial asset,
should be derecognized when the transferor has not transferred the entire financial asset to an
entity that is not consolidated with the transferor in the financial statements being presented
and/or when the transferor has continuing involvement with the transferred financial asset. The
new guidance became effective for the Corporation on January 1, 2010. The implementation of this
new guidance did not have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
FASB ASC 820-10 In January 2010, the FASB issued an update (ASC No. 2010-06, Improving
Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements) impacting FASB ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures. The amendments in this update require new disclosures about significant transfers in
and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The amendments also require a reporting
entity to provide information about activity for purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in
Level 3 fair value measurements and clarify disclosures about the Level of disaggregation and
disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. This update became effective for the
Corporation on January 1, 2010. The implementation of this new guidance did not have a material
impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements of the prior periods have been
reclassified to conform to presentations used in the 2011 consolidated financial statements. Such
reclassifications had no effect on the Corporations consolidated financial condition or net
income.
2. INVESTMENT SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE
The amortized cost, related estimated fair value, and unrealized gains and losses for
investment securities were as follows at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Obligation of U.S.Government Corporations
and Agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
$ |
118,316 |
|
|
$ |
3,262 |
|
|
$ |
(299 |
) |
|
$ |
121,279 |
|
Other |
|
|
65,538 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
(414 |
) |
|
|
65,308 |
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
|
|
15,417 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
15,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
|
199,271 |
|
|
|
3,590 |
|
|
|
(747 |
) |
|
|
202,114 |
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
2,130 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities AFS |
|
$ |
201,401 |
|
|
$ |
3,773 |
|
|
$ |
(936 |
) |
|
$ |
204,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Obligation of U.S. Government Corporations
and Agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
$ |
129,008 |
|
|
$ |
3,794 |
|
|
$ |
(287 |
) |
|
$ |
132,515 |
|
Other |
|
|
59,046 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
58,903 |
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
|
|
13,625 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
13,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
|
201,679 |
|
|
|
4,188 |
|
|
|
(778 |
) |
|
|
205,089 |
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
2,130 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities AFS |
|
$ |
203,809 |
|
|
$ |
4,336 |
|
|
$ |
(972 |
) |
|
$ |
207,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale with an aggregate fair value of $105,508,000 and $94,979,000 at
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, were pledged to secure public funds, trust
funds, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other balances of $69,436,000 and
$70,861,000 at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, as required by law.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities, by expected maturity,
are shown below at March 31, 2011. Expected maturities on debt securities will differ from
contractual maturities, because some borrowers may have the right to call
12
or prepay obligations
with or without call or prepayment penalties. Other securities and marketable equity securities
are not considered to have defined maturities and are included in the Due after ten years
category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Average |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
2,320 |
|
|
$ |
2,339 |
|
|
|
3.55 |
% |
Due after one year to five years |
|
|
47,391 |
|
|
|
47,301 |
|
|
|
1.88 |
% |
Due after five years to ten years |
|
|
35,487 |
|
|
|
35,821 |
|
|
|
3.31 |
% |
Due after ten years |
|
|
116,203 |
|
|
|
118,777 |
|
|
|
3.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
201,401 |
|
|
$ |
204,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no aggregate investments with a single issuer (excluding the U. S. Government and
its Agencies) which exceeded ten percent of consolidated stockholders equity at March 31, 2011 or
December 31, 2010. The quality rating of all obligations of state and political subdivisions were
A or higher, as rated by Moodys or Standard and Poors. The only exceptions were local issues
which were not rated, but were secured by the full faith and credit obligations of the communities
that issued these securities. All of the state and political subdivision investments were actively
traded in a liquid market.
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) at least on a
quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation.
Investment securities classified as available for sale or held-to-maturity are generally evaluated
for OTTI under FASB ASC 320 (SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities). In determining OTTI under the FASB ASC 320 (SFAS No. 115) model, management considers
many factors, including (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less
than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the
market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions, and (4) whether the entity has the intent
to sell the debt security or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before
its anticipated recovery. The assessment of whether an other-than-temporary decline exists
involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to
management at a point in time.
When other-than-temporary-impairment occurs, the amount of the other-than-temporary-impairment
recognized in earnings depends on whether an entity intends to sell the security or more likely
than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any
current-period credit loss. If an entity intends to sell or more likely than not will be required
to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit
loss, the other-than-temporary impairment shall be recognized in earnings equal to the entire
difference between the investments amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet
date. If an entity does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that
the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less
any current-period loss, the other-than-temporary impairment shall be separated into the amount
representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of the total
other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value
of cash flows expected to be collected and is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total
other-than-temporary- impairment related to the other factors shall be recognized in other
comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. The previous amortized cost basis less the
other-than-temporary-impairment recognized in earnings shall become the new amortized cost basis of
the investment.
The following summary shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by
investment category of those individual securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position for less than or more than 12 months as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
Less than Twelve Months |
|
|
Twelve Months or Greater |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government Corporations
and Agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
$ |
27,570 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,570 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
Other |
|
|
36,587 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,587 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
|
|
2,917 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,917 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
|
67,074 |
|
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,074 |
|
|
|
747 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
922 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
67,119 |
|
|
$ |
750 |
|
|
$ |
922 |
|
|
$ |
186 |
|
|
$ |
68,041 |
|
|
$ |
936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Less than Twelve Months |
|
|
Twelve Months or Greater |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government Corporations
and Agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
$ |
33,482 |
|
|
$ |
287 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33,482 |
|
|
$ |
287 |
|
Other |
|
|
29,578 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,578 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
|
|
3,849 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,849 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
|
66,909 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
66,909 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
66,954 |
|
|
$ |
781 |
|
|
$ |
1,005 |
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
$ |
67,959 |
|
|
$ |
972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011, the Corporation had a total of 277 individual debt securities and 45
individual equity security positions. At March 31, 2011, there were a total of 43 individual debt
securities and 13 individual equity securities that were in a continuous unrealized loss position
for less than twelve months. At March 31, 2011, there were no debt securities and a total of 10
individual equity securities in a continuous loss position for greater than twelve months.
The Corporation invests in various forms of agency debt including mortgage-backed securities
and callable agency debt. The fair market value of these securities is influenced by market
interest rates, prepayment speeds on mortgage securities, bid to offer spreads in the market place
and credit premiums for various types of agency debt. These factors change continuously and
therefore the market value of these securities may be higher or lower than the Corporations
carrying value at any measurement date. The Corporation does not consider the debt securities
contained in the previous table to be other-than-temporarily impaired since it has both the intent
and ability to hold the securities until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity.
The Corporations marketable equity securities consist of common stock positions in various
Commercial Banks, Savings and Loans/Thrifts, and Diversified Financial Service Corporations varying
in asset size and geographic region. The Corporations equity securities represent less than 1
percent of the total available for sale investments as of March 31, 2011. The following tables
display the Corporations holdings of these securities by asset size and geographic region as of
March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
Estimated |
(In Thousands) |
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
Asset size($) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Under $1 Billion |
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
(24 |
) |
|
$ |
495 |
|
$1 to $5 Billion |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
216 |
|
$6 to $100 Billion |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
680 |
|
Over $100 Billion |
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,130 |
|
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
(189 |
) |
|
$ |
2,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
Estimated |
(In Thousands) |
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
Geographic Region |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Eastern U.S. |
|
$ |
1,040 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
(97 |
) |
|
$ |
1,046 |
|
Southeastern U.S. |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
109 |
|
Western U.S. |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
50 |
|
National |
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,130 |
|
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
(189 |
) |
|
$ |
2,124 |
|
|
|
|
The fair market value of the equity securities tends to fluctuate with the overall equity
markets as well as the trends specific to each institution. The equity securities portfolio is
reviewed in a similar manner as that of the debt securities with greater emphasis placed on the
length of time the market value has been less than the carrying value and the financial sector
outlook. The Corporation also reviews dividend payment activities, levels of non performing assets
and loan loss reserves, and whether or not the issuer is participating in the TARP Capital Purchase
Program. The starting point for the equity analysis is the length and severity of market value
decline. The Corporation and an independent consultant monitor the entire portfolio monthly with
particular attention given to securities in a continuous loss position of at least ten percent for
over twelve months. During 2010, impairment was recognized on a
14
few securities which management
believed that a sufficient amount of credit damage had occurred relative to the issuers capital
position to render the security unlikely to recover to our cost within the near term. For the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 the Corporation did not record an other-than-temporary
impairment related to the investment in these equity securities. Securities with an unrealized
loss that were determined to be other-than-temporary were written down to fair value, with the
write-down recorded as a realized loss included in security (losses) gains. The Corporation
evaluated the near-term prospects of the issuer in relation the severity and duration of the market
value decline as well as the other attributes listed above. Based on that evaluation and the
Corporations ability and intent to hold these equity securities for a reasonable period of time
sufficient for a forecasted recovery of fair value, the Corporation does not consider these equity
securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2011.
3. LOANS
Major classifications of loans at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
$ |
35,836 |
|
|
$ |
33,819 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
27,194 |
|
|
|
25,180 |
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgages |
|
|
92,737 |
|
|
|
95,688 |
|
Other construction and land development loans |
|
|
7,155 |
|
|
|
6,284 |
|
Secured by farmland |
|
|
5,635 |
|
|
|
5,697 |
|
Consumer real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
20,494 |
|
|
|
21,687 |
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
17,778 |
|
|
|
17,802 |
|
1-4 family residential mortgages |
|
|
124,011 |
|
|
|
121,665 |
|
Construction |
|
|
5,556 |
|
|
|
5,405 |
|
Installment loans to individuals |
|
|
6,990 |
|
|
|
7,232 |
|
Unearned discount |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans |
|
$ |
343,381 |
|
|
$ |
340,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Origination and Risk Management
The Corporation has certain lending policies and procedures in place that are designed to
maximize loan income within an acceptable level of risk. Management reviews and the Board of
Directors approve these policies and procedures on a regular basis. A reporting system supplements
the review process by providing management with frequent reports related to loan production, loan
quality, concentrations of credit, loan delinquencies and non-performing and potential problem
loans. Diversification in the loan portfolio is a means of managing risk associated with
fluctuations in economic conditions.
Commercial, financial, and agricultural loans are underwritten after evaluating and
understanding the borrowers ability to operate profitably and prudently expand its business.
Underwriting standards are designed to promote relationship banking rather than transactional
banking. Once it is determined that the borrowers management possesses sound ethics and solid
business acumen, the Corporations management examines current and projected cash flows to
determine the ability of the borrower to repay their obligations as agreed. Commercial, financial,
and agricultural loans are primarily made based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and
secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The cash flows of borrowers,
however, may not be as expected and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value.
Most commercial, financial, and agricultural loans are secured by the assets being financed or
other business assets such as accounts receivable or inventory and may incorporate a personal
guarantee; however, some short-term loans may be made on an unsecured basis. In the case of
loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans
may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its
customers.
Commercial real estate loans are subject to underwriting standards and processes similar to
commercial, financial, and agricultural loans, in addition to those of real estate loans. These
loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate.
Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment
of these loans is generally largely dependent on the successful operation of the property securing
the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan. Commercial real estate loans
may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy.
The properties securing the Corporations commercial real estate portfolio are diverse in terms of
type and geographic locations served by the Corporation. This diversity helps reduce the
Corporations exposure to adverse economic events that affect any single market or industry.
Management monitors and evaluates commercial real estate loans based on collateral. As a general
rule the Corporation avoids financing single-purpose projects unless other underwriting factors are
present to help mitigate risk.
The Corporation originates consumer loans using a credit scoring system to supplement the
underwriting process. To monitor and manage consumer loan risk, polices and procedures are
reviewed and modified on a regular basis. In addition, risk is reduced by keeping the loan amounts
relatively small and spread across many individual borrowers. Additionally, trend reports are
reviewed regularly by management. Underwriting standards for home equity loans are influenced by
statutory requirements, which include such
15
controls as maximum loan-to-value percentages,
collection remedies, documentation requirements, and limits on the number of loans an individual
can have at one time.
The Corporation contracts an independent third party consultant that reviews and validates the
credit risk program on an annual basis. Results of theses reviews are presented to management.
The loan review process complements and reinforces the risk identification and assessment decisions
made by lenders and credit personnel, as well as the Corporations loan policies and procedures.
Real estate loans held-for-sale in the amount of $3,063,000 at March 31, 2011 and $2,005,000
at December 31, 2010 are included in consumer real estate loans above and are carried at the lower
of cost or market.
The aggregate amount of demand deposits that have been reclassified as consumer loan balances
at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are $189,000 and $137,000, respectively.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Most of the Corporations lending activity occurs within the Banks primary market area which
encompasses Columbia County, a 484 square mile area located in North central Pennsylvania. The
majority of the Corporations loan portfolio consists of commercial real estate and consumer real
estate loans. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were no concentrations of loans
related to any single industry in excess of 10% of total loans.
Non-Accrual and Past Due Loans
Generally, a loan is classified as non-accrual; with the accrual of interest on such a loan
discontinued when the contractual payment of principal or interest has become 90-days past due or
management has serious doubts about further collectability of principal or interest, even though
the loan may be currently performing. A loan may remain on accrual status if it is in the process
of collection and is either guaranteed or well-secured. When a loan is placed on non-accrual
status, unpaid interest credited to income in the current year is reversed, and unpaid interest
accrued in prior years is charged against the allowance for loan losses. Certain non-accrual loans
may continue to perform wherein payments are still being received with those payments generally
applied to principal. Non-accrual loans remain under constant scrutiny and if performance
continues, interest income may be recorded on a cash basis based on managements judgment as to
collectability of principal.
Non-accrual loans, segregated by class of loans, were as follows as of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
$ |
338 |
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgages |
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
2,166 |
|
Other construction and land development loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by farmland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 family residential mortgages |
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
1,141 |
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment loans to individuals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,117 |
|
|
$ |
3,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were no significant commitments to lend
additional funds with respect to non-accrual and restructured loans.
Generally, a loan is considered past due when a payment is in arrears for a period of 10 or 15
days, depending on the type of loan. Delinquent notices are issued at this point and collection
efforts will continue on loans past due beyond 60 days which have not been satisfied. Past due
loans are continually evaluated with determination for charge-off being made when no reasonable
chance remains that the status of the loan can be improved.
An age analysis of past due loans, segregated by class of loans, as of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 were as follows:
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
Loans |
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing Loans |
|
|
30-89 Days |
|
90 or more days |
|
Total Past |
|
Current |
|
Total |
|
90 or more |
(In Thousands) |
|
Past Due |
|
Past Due |
|
Due Loans |
|
Loans |
|
Loans |
|
Days Past Due |
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
$ |
338 |
|
|
$ |
647 |
|
|
$ |
35,189 |
|
|
$ |
35,836 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,194 |
|
|
|
27,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgages |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
1,287 |
|
|
|
91,450 |
|
|
|
92,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other construction and land development loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,155 |
|
|
|
7,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by farmland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,635 |
|
|
|
5,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
19,897 |
|
|
|
20,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
17,738 |
|
|
|
17,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 family residential mortgages |
|
|
1,954 |
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
3,277 |
|
|
|
120,734 |
|
|
|
124,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,556 |
|
|
|
5,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
Installment loans to individuals |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
6,953 |
|
|
|
6,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans |
|
$ |
2,768 |
|
|
$ |
3,117 |
|
|
$ |
5,885 |
|
|
$ |
337,496 |
|
|
$ |
343,381 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Loans |
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing Loans |
|
|
30-89 Days |
|
90 or more days |
|
Total Past |
|
Current |
|
Total |
|
90 or more |
(In Thousands) |
|
Past Due |
|
Past Due |
|
Due Loans |
|
Loans |
|
Loans |
|
Days Past Due |
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
468 |
|
|
$ |
33,351 |
|
|
$ |
33,819 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,180 |
|
|
|
25,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgages |
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
2,166 |
|
|
|
2,677 |
|
|
|
93,011 |
|
|
|
95,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other construction and land development loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,284 |
|
|
|
6,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by farmland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,697 |
|
|
|
5,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
21,254 |
|
|
|
21,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,802 |
|
|
|
17,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 family residential mortgages |
|
|
2,233 |
|
|
|
1,141 |
|
|
|
3,374 |
|
|
|
118,291 |
|
|
|
121,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,405 |
|
|
|
5,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
Installment loans to individuals |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
7,200 |
|
|
|
7,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans |
|
$ |
3,156 |
|
|
$ |
3,828 |
|
|
$ |
6,984 |
|
|
$ |
333,469 |
|
|
$ |
340,453 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
There were no loans past due 90 days and still accruing interest at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010.
Impaired Loans
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable
the Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the original
contractual terms of the loan agreement, including scheduled principal and interest payments.
Impairment is evaluated in smaller-balance loans of a similar nature and on an individual basis for
other loans. If a loan is impaired, a specific allowance is allocated, if necessary, so that the
loan is reported net, at the present value of estimated cash flows using the loans existing rate
or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. The
recognition of interest income on impaired loans is the same as for non-accrual loans discussed
above.
No additional charge to operations was required to provide for these impaired loans as the
specifically allocated allowance of $790,000 at March 31, 2011, is estimated by management to be
adequate to provide for the loan loss allowance associated with these impaired loans.
Impaired loans are set forth in the following table as of March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010:
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
Unpaid |
|
Recorded |
|
Recorded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual |
|
Investment |
|
Investment |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
With No |
|
With |
|
Recorded |
|
Related |
(In Thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
Allowance |
|
Allowance |
|
Investment |
|
Allowance |
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
$ |
612 |
|
|
$ |
448 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
$ |
612 |
|
|
$ |
133 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgages |
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
Other construction and land development loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by farmland |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 family residential mortgages |
|
|
1,293 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
1,293 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment loans to individuals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans |
|
$ |
3,934 |
|
|
$ |
1,924 |
|
|
$ |
2,010 |
|
|
$ |
3,934 |
|
|
$ |
790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Unpaid |
|
Recorded |
|
Recorded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual |
|
Investment |
|
Investment |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
With No |
|
With |
|
Recorded |
|
Related |
(In Thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
Allowance |
|
Allowance |
|
Investment |
|
Allowance |
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
$ |
498 |
|
|
$ |
463 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
498 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgages |
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
1,841 |
|
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
Other construction and land development loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by farmland |
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 family residential mortgages |
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment loans to individuals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans |
|
$ |
4,764 |
|
|
$ |
2,094 |
|
|
$ |
2,670 |
|
|
$ |
4,764 |
|
|
$ |
813 |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Possible Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is established through provisions for loan losses charged
against income. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan
losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. The allowance for loan
losses is maintained at a level established by management to be adequate to absorb estimated
potential loan losses. Managements periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan
losses is based on the Corporations past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the
portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay (including the timing
of future payments), the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan
portfolio, current economic conditions, and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently
subjective as it requires material estimates, including the amounts and timing of future cash flows
expected to be received on impaired loans that may be susceptible to significant change.
The following table details activity in the allowance for possible loan losses by portfolio
segment for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. Allocation of a portion of the
allowance to one category of loans does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other
categories.
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Commercial |
|
Consumer |
|
Installment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial & |
|
Real |
|
Real |
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Agricultural |
|
Estate |
|
Estate |
|
Individuals |
|
Unallocated |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
752 |
|
|
$ |
2,286 |
|
|
$ |
1,243 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
414 |
|
|
$ |
4,801 |
|
Provision charged to operations |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
80 |
|
Loans charged off |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
919 |
|
|
$ |
2,160 |
|
|
$ |
1,301 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
|
4,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance individually
evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
$ |
567 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance collectively
evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
786 |
|
|
$ |
1,593 |
|
|
$ |
1,225 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
$ |
4,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Commercial |
|
Consumer |
|
Installment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial & |
|
Real |
|
Real |
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Agricultural |
|
Estate |
|
Estate |
|
Individuals |
|
Unallocated |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
567 |
|
|
$ |
1,793 |
|
|
$ |
1,339 |
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
362 |
|
|
$ |
4,210 |
|
Provision charged to operations |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
310 |
|
Loans charged off |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(518 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(540 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
605 |
|
|
$ |
1,852 |
|
|
$ |
1,301 |
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
|
3,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance individually
evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
411 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance collectively
evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
605 |
|
|
$ |
1,441 |
|
|
$ |
1,215 |
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
3,489 |
|
|
|
|
The Corporations recorded investment in loans as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010
related to each balance in the allowance for possible loan losses by portfolio segment and
disaggregated on the basis of the Corporations impairment methodology was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Commercial |
|
Consumer |
|
Installment |
|
|
|
|
Financial & |
|
Real |
|
Real |
|
Loans |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Agricultural |
|
Estate |
|
Estate |
|
Individuals |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Ending balance individually
evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
612 |
|
|
$ |
1,581 |
|
|
$ |
1,741 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance collectively
evaluated for impairment |
|
|
62,418 |
|
|
|
103,946 |
|
|
|
166,098 |
|
|
|
6,985 |
|
|
|
339,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
63,030 |
|
|
$ |
105,527 |
|
|
$ |
167,839 |
|
|
$ |
6,985 |
|
|
$ |
343,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Commercial |
|
Consumer |
|
Installment |
|
|
|
|
Financial & |
|
Real |
|
Real |
|
Loans |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Agricultural |
|
Estate |
|
Estate |
|
Individuals |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Ending balance individually
evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
498 |
|
|
$ |
2,644 |
|
|
$ |
1,622 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance collectively
evaluated for impairment |
|
|
58,501 |
|
|
|
105,025 |
|
|
|
164,937 |
|
|
|
7,226 |
|
|
|
335,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
58,999 |
|
|
$ |
107,669 |
|
|
$ |
166,559 |
|
|
$ |
7,226 |
|
|
$ |
340,453 |
|
|
|
|
19
Loan Modifications
From time to time, the Bank may agree to modify the contractual terms of a borrowers loan.
In cases where such modifications represent a concession to a borrower experiencing financial
difficulty, the modification is considered a troubled debt restructuring. Loans modified in a
troubled debt restructuring are placed on nonaccrual status until the Bank determines the future
collection of principal and interest is reasonably assured, which generally requires that the
borrower demonstrate a period of performance according to the restructured terms of six months. At
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were no significant loans modified in troubled debt
restructurings.
4. SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and Federal Home Loan Bank advances generally
represented overnight or less than 30-day borrowings. U.S. Treasury tax and loan notes for
collections made by the Bank were payable on demand.
5. LONG-TERM BORROWINGS
Long-term borrowings consist of advances due to the FHLB Pittsburgh.
6. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS
The Bank has entered into certain non-qualified deferred compensation agreements with certain
present and retired executive officers and directors. Expenses related to these non-qualified
deferred compensation plans amounted to $42,000 and $34,000 for the three month periods ended March
31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
7. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK AND CONCENTRATIONS OF
CREDIT RISK
The Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal
course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments
include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit.
Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess
of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The contract or notional amounts of
those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Corporation has in particular classes of
financial instruments. The Corporation does not engage in trading activities with respect to any
of its financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk.
The Corporation may require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with
off-balance sheet credit risk. The contract or notional amounts at March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$ |
65,357 |
|
|
$ |
65,926 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
5,135 |
|
|
|
2,674 |
|
Dealer floor plans |
|
|
1,926 |
|
|
|
966 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
3,063 |
|
|
|
2,005 |
|
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no
violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Because many of
the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do
not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Corporation evaluates each customers
creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary
by the Corporation upon extension of credit, is based on managements credit evaluation of the
counter-party. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property,
plant, equipment and income-producing commercial properties.
Standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued
by the Corporation to guarantee payment to a third party when a customer either fails to repay an
obligation or fails to perform some non-financial obligation. The credit risk involved in issuing
letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to
customers. The Corporation holds collateral supporting those commitments for which collateral is
deemed necessary.
The Corporations exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to
the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and letters of credit is represented by
the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit
policies in making commitments and conditional obligations, as it does for on-balance sheet
instruments.
The Corporation granted commercial, consumer and residential loans to customers primarily
within Pennsylvania. Of the total loan portfolio, 79.6% was for real estate loans, principally
residential. It is the opinion of management that this high concentration did not pose an adverse
credit risk. Further, it is managements opinion that the remainder of the loan portfolio is
balanced and diversified to the extent necessary to avoid any significant concentration of credit.
20
8. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Effective January 1, 2008, the Corporation adopted FASB ASC 820-10 (SFAS No. 157), which,
among other things, requires enhanced disclosures about assets and liabilities carried at fair
value. FASB ASC 820-10 establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework associated with the level of
pricing observability utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value. The standard
describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:
|
|
|
Level I:
|
|
Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of
the reported date. |
|
|
|
Level II:
|
|
Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either
directly or indirectly
observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities include
items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently, and items that are
fair valued using other financial instruments of which can be directly observed. |
|
|
|
Level III:
|
|
Assets and liabilities that have little or no pricing observability as of the
reported date. These items do not have two-way markets and are measured using
managements best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into determination of fair
value require significant management judgment or estimation. |
The following table presents the assets reported on the consolidated statements of financial
condition at their fair value as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 by level within the fair
value hierarchy. As required by FASB ASC 820-10, financial assets and liabilities are classified
in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
(In Thousands) |
|
Level I |
|
Level II |
|
Level III |
|
Total |
Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Securities, available-for-sale |
|
$ |
2,124 |
|
|
$ |
202,114 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
204,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
(In Thousands) |
|
Level I |
|
Level II |
|
Level III |
|
Total |
Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Securities, available-for-sale |
|
$ |
2,084 |
|
|
$ |
205,089 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
207,173 |
|
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, investments measured at fair value on a recurring
basis and the valuation methods used are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Level I |
|
|
Level II |
|
|
Level III |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation of US Government Agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
121,280 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
121,280 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,308 |
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,526 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,124 |
|
|
$ |
202,114 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
204,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Level I |
|
|
Level II |
|
|
Level III |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation of US Government Agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
132,515 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
132,515 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,903 |
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,671 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,084 |
|
|
$ |
205,089 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
207,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
The estimated fair values of equity securities classified as Level I are derived from quoted
market prices in active markets; these assets consists mainly of stocks held in other banks. The
estimated fair values of all debt securities classified as Level II are obtained from
nationally-recognized third-party pricing agencies. The estimated fair values are derived
primarily from cash flow models, which include assumptions for interest rates, credit losses, and
prepayment speeds. The significant inputs utilized in the cash flow models are based on market
data obtained from sources independent of the Corporation (observable inputs), and are therefore
classified as Level II within the fair value hierarchy.
The following table presents the assets reported on the consolidated statements of financial
condition at their fair value on a non-recurring basis as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010
by level within the fair value hierarchy. As required by FASB ASC 820-10, financial assets and
liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant
to the fair value measurement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Level I |
|
|
Level II |
|
|
Level III |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Measured on a Non-recurring Basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,934 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,934 |
|
Loans Held for Sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,063 |
|
Mortgage Servicing Rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,525 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Level I |
|
|
Level II |
|
|
Level III |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Measured on a Non-recurring Basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,764 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,764 |
|
Loans Held for Sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,005 |
|
Mortgage Servicing Rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,260 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. ESTIMATED FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Corporation is required to disclose estimated fair values for its financial instruments.
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and
information about the financial instrument. In cases where quoted market prices are not available,
fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. These
techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and
estimates of future cash flows. Fair value estimates derived through these techniques cannot be
substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in
immediate settlement of the instrument. FASB ASC 825-10 excludes certain financial instruments and
all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair
value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Corporation.
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying values and estimated fair values of
financial instruments are presented in the table below:
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
(In Thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Financial Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and short-term instruments |
|
$ |
32,951 |
|
|
$ |
32,951 |
|
|
$ |
27,595 |
|
|
$ |
27,595 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
204,238 |
|
|
|
204,238 |
|
|
|
207,173 |
|
|
|
207,173 |
|
Restricted securities |
|
|
2,863 |
|
|
|
2,863 |
|
|
|
3,012 |
|
|
|
3,012 |
|
Loans, net |
|
|
338,523 |
|
|
|
345,485 |
|
|
|
335,652 |
|
|
|
341,814 |
|
Cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance |
|
|
12,075 |
|
|
|
12,075 |
|
|
|
11,942 |
|
|
|
11,942 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
1,632 |
|
|
|
1,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
416,893 |
|
|
|
420,049 |
|
|
|
410,915 |
|
|
|
414,706 |
|
Noninterest- bearing deposits |
|
|
65,574 |
|
|
|
65,574 |
|
|
|
62,877 |
|
|
|
62,877 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
55,060 |
|
|
|
55,060 |
|
|
|
58,759 |
|
|
|
58,759 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
6,122 |
|
|
|
6,289 |
|
|
|
6,123 |
|
|
|
6,303 |
|
Junior subordinate debentures |
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
4,640 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet Assets (Liabilities): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
65,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
65,926 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,674 |
|
Dealer floor plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
966 |
|
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Corporation in estimating its fair
value disclosures for financial instruments:
CASH AND OTHER SHORT-TERM INSTRUMENTS
Cash and due from banks, interest bearing deposits with other banks, and Federal Funds
sold had carrying values which were a reasonable estimate of fair value. Accordingly, fair
values regarding these instruments were provided by reference to carrying values reflected on
the consolidated balance sheets.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The fair value of investment securities which included mortgage backed securities were
estimated based on bid prices published in financial newspapers or bid quotations received
from securities dealers.
RESTRICTED SECURITIES
The carrying value of regulatory stock approximates fair value based on applicable
redemption provisions.
LOANS
Fair values were estimated for categories of loans with similar financial
characteristics. Loans were segregated by type such as commercial, tax-exempt, real estate
mortgages and consumer. For estimation purposes, each loan category was further segmented
into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and also into performing and non-performing
classifications.
The fair value of each category of performing loans was calculated by discounting future
cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with
similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.
Fair value for non-performing loans was based on managements estimate of future cash
flows discounted using a rate commensurate with the risk associated with the estimated future
cash flows. The assumptions used by management were judgmentally determined using specific
borrower information.
CASH SURRENDER VALUE OF BANK OWNED LIFE INSURANCE
The fair values are equal to the current carrying value.
ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE AND PAYABLE
The fair values are equal to the current carrying value.
DEPOSITS
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as Demand Deposits, Savings
Accounts, and Money Market Accounts, was equal to the amount payable on demand at March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010.
Fair values for fixed rate Certificates of Deposit were estimated using a discounted
cash flow calculation that applied interest rates currently being offered on certificates to
a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.
SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
23
The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to
repurchase and other short-term borrowings approximated their fair values.
LONG-TERM BORROWINGS
The fair values of long-term borrowings, other than capitalized leases, are estimated
using discounted cash flow analyses based on the Corporations incremental borrowing rate for
similar instruments. The carrying amounts of capitalized leases approximated their fair
values, because the incremental borrowing rate used in the carrying amount calculation was at
the market rate.
COMMITMENTS TO EXTEND CREDIT AND STANDBY LETTERS OF CREDIT
Management estimated that there were no material differences between the notional amount
and the estimated fair value of those off-balance sheet items, because they were primarily
composed of unfunded loan commitments which were generally priced at market value at the time
of funding.
10. MANAGEMENTS ASSERTIONS AND COMMENTS REQUIRED TO BE PROVIDED WITH FORM 10-Q
FILING
In managements opinion, the consolidated interim financial statements reflect fair
presentation of the consolidated financial position of the Corporation, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for the interim periods presented. Further, the consolidated interim
financial statements are unaudited, however they reflect all adjustments, which are in the opinion
of management, necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial condition and consolidated
results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented and that all such
adjustments to the consolidated financial statements are of a normal recurring nature.
These consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
requirements of Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all disclosures normally required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to financial
institutions as included with consolidated financial statements included in the Corporations
annual Form 10-K filing. The reader of these consolidated interim financial statements may wish to
refer to the Corporations annual report or Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc.:
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc. and
Subsidiary as of March 31, 2011, the related consolidated statements of income for the three month
periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 and changes in stockholders equity and cash flows for the
three month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. These consolidated interim financial statements
are the responsibility of the management of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to
the consolidated interim financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc.
and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes
in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our
report dated March 8, 2011, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2010, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the
consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ J. H. Williams & Co., LLP
J.H. Williams & Co., LLP
Kingston, Pennsylvania
May 10, 2011
24
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
Certain statements in this section and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-Q,
other periodic reports filed by us under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any
other written or oral statements made by or on behalf of us may include forward looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 which
reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Such forward
looking statements are based on general assumptions and are subject to various risks,
uncertainties, and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from the views,
beliefs and projections expressed in such statements. These risks, uncertainties and other factors
include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
Our business and financial results are affected by business and economic
conditions, both generally and specifically in the Northcentral Pennsylvania market
in which we operate. |
|
|
|
|
Changes in interest rates and valuations in the debt, equity and other financial
markets. |
|
|
|
|
Disruptions in the liquidity and other functioning of financial markets,
including such disruptions in the market for real estate and other assets commonly
securing financial products. |
|
|
|
|
Actions by the Federal Reserve Board and other government agencies, including
those that impact money supply and market interest rates. |
|
|
|
|
Changes in our customers and suppliers performance in general and their
creditworthiness in particular. |
|
|
|
|
Changes in customer preferences and behavior, whether as a result of changing
business and economic conditions or other factors. |
|
|
|
|
Changes resulting from the newly enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act. |
|
|
|
|
A continuation of recent turbulence in significant segments of the United States
and global financial markets, particularly if it worsens, could impact our
performance, both directly by affecting our revenues and the value of our assets and
liabilities and indirectly by affecting our customers and suppliers and the economy
generally. |
|
|
|
|
Our business and financial performance could be impacted as the financial
industry restructures in the current environment by changes in the competitive
landscape. |
|
|
|
|
Given current economic and financial market conditions, our forward-looking
statements are subject to the risk that these conditions will be substantially
different than we are currently expecting. These statements are based on our
current expectations that interest rates will remain low throughout most of 2011
with consistent credit spreads and our view that national economic trends currently
point to improving economic conditions into 2011 and a subdued recovery. |
|
|
|
|
Legal and regulatory developments could have an impact on our ability to operate
our businesses or our financial condition or results of operations or our
competitive position or reputation. Reputational impacts, in turn, could affect
matters such as business generation and retention, our ability to attract and retain
management, liquidity and funding. These legal and regulatory developments could
include: (a) the unfavorable resolution of legal proceedings or regulatory and other
governmental inquiries; (b) increased litigation risk from recent regulatory and
other governmental developments; (c) the results of the regulatory examination
process, and regulators future use of supervisory and enforcement tools; (d)
legislative and regulatory reforms, including changes to laws and regulations
involving tax, pension, education and mortgage lending, the protection of
confidential customer information, and other aspects of the financial institution
industry; and (e) changes in accounting policies and principles. |
|
|
|
|
Our business and operating results are affected by our ability to identify and
effectively manage risks inherent in our businesses, including, where appropriate,
through the effective use of third-party insurance and capital management
techniques. |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to anticipate and respond to technological changes can have an impact
on our ability to respond to customer needs and to meet competitive demands. |
25
|
|
|
Our ability to implement our business initiatives and strategies could affect our financial performance over the next several years. |
|
|
|
|
Competition can have an impact on customer acquisition, growth and retention, as well
as on our credit spreads and product pricing, which can affect market share, deposits and revenues. |
|
|
|
|
Our business and operating results can also be affected by widespread natural disasters,
terrorist activities or international hostilities, either as a result of the impact on the economy
and capital and other financial markets generally or on us or on our customers and suppliers. |
|
|
|
|
The words believe, expect, anticipate, project and similar expressions signify forward
looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward looking
statements made by or on behalf of us. Any such statement speaks only as of the date the statement
was made. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward looking statements.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the detailed
information and consolidated financial statements, including notes thereto, included elsewhere in
this Annual Report. Our consolidated financial condition and results of operations are essentially
those of our subsidiary, the Bank. Therefore, the analysis that follows is directed to the
performance of the Bank.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
NET INTEREST INCOME
2011 vs. 2010
Tax-equivalent net interest income, as reflected in the following tables, decreased $70
thousand to $5.2 million at March 31, 2011 when compared to the same 2010 time period. Reported
tax-equivalent interest income decreased $490 thousand to $6.5 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 when compared to the same 2010 time period. The decrease to interest income was
primarily rate driven as maturing and called investment securities re-priced throughout the past
year. Investment security tax-equivalent interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2011
decreased $371 thousand when compared to 2010 results. Reported interest expense decreased $420
thousand to $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 when compared to the same 2010
time period. The decrease was primarily rate driven as maturing time deposits re-priced during the
year lowering the average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits to 1.19 percent for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 from 1.53 percent at March 31, 2010.
Net interest margin decreased to 3.68 percent at March 31, 2011 from 3.80 percent at March 31,
2010. The overall net decrease in margin resulted from the yield on investment securities
decreasing 60 basis points to 3.17 percent and the yield on loans decreasing 30 basis points to
5.76 percent at March 31, 2011. As discussed above, the decrease in loan and investment security
yields were partially offset by a 34 basis point decrease in deposit yields and a 59 basis point
decrease in other borrowings. The 170 basis point yield decrease on long-term borrowings reflects
the maturity and repayment of several FHLB borrowings totaling $9.0 million during 2010. The FHLB
borrowings carried approximate annual percentage rates of 6.0.
The following Average Balance Sheet and Rate Analysis table presents the average assets,
actual income or expense and the average yield on assets, liabilities and stockholders equity for
the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
26
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET AND RATE ANALYSIS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Average Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average Rate |
|
|
Average Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average Rate |
|
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt loans |
|
$ |
27,442 |
|
|
$ |
425 |
|
|
|
6.28 |
% |
|
$ |
20,251 |
|
|
$ |
321 |
|
|
|
6.43 |
% |
All other loans |
|
|
315,552 |
|
|
|
4,448 |
|
|
|
5.72 |
% |
|
|
314,504 |
|
|
|
4,678 |
|
|
|
6.03 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans (2)(3)(4) |
|
|
342,994 |
|
|
|
4,873 |
|
|
|
5.76 |
% |
|
|
334,755 |
|
|
|
4,999 |
|
|
|
6.06 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable securities |
|
|
195,024 |
|
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
3.01 |
% |
|
|
204,375 |
|
|
|
1,871 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
% |
Tax-exempt securitites (3) |
|
|
14,199 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
5.38 |
% |
|
|
10,965 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities |
|
|
209,223 |
|
|
|
1,659 |
|
|
|
3.17 |
% |
|
|
215,340 |
|
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
% |
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
13,750 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
% |
|
|
5,799 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
567,557 |
|
|
|
6,541 |
|
|
|
4.66 |
% |
|
|
556,751 |
|
|
|
7,031 |
|
|
|
5.10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
49,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
617,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
602,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings |
|
$ |
66,645 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
% |
|
$ |
58,920 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
% |
Now deposits |
|
|
73,843 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
% |
|
|
72,100 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
% |
Money market deposits |
|
|
45,533 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
% |
|
|
42,609 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
0.77 |
% |
Time deposits |
|
|
229,899 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
1.90 |
% |
|
|
234,970 |
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
2.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
415,920 |
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
% |
|
|
408,599 |
|
|
|
1,537 |
|
|
|
1.53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
55,280 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
52,727 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
0.82 |
% |
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
6,122 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
2.58 |
% |
|
|
11,850 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
4.28 |
% |
Junior subordinate debentures |
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
2.10 |
% |
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings |
|
|
66,042 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
% |
|
|
69,217 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
1.49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
481,962 |
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
% |
|
|
477,816 |
|
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
1.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
|
64,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
2,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
68,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
617,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
602,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/margin (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,170 |
|
|
|
3.68 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,240 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average volume information was compared using daily (or monthly) averages for interest-earning
and bearing accounts.
Certain balance sheet items utilized quarter-end balances for averages. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest on loans
includes fee income. |
|
(3) |
|
Tax exempt interest revenue is shown on a tax-equivalent basis using a
statutory federal income tax rate of 34 percent for 2011 and 2010. |
|
(4) |
|
Nonaccrual loans have been
included with loans for the purpose of analyzing net interest earnings. |
|
(5) |
|
Net interest margin is computed by dividing annualized net interest income by total interest
earning assets. |
|
(6) |
|
Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average rate earned
on interest-earning assets and the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. |
27
Reconcilement of Taxable Equivalent Net Interest Income
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
6,332 |
|
|
$ |
6,868 |
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
4,961 |
|
|
|
5,077 |
|
Tax equivalent adjustment |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
(fully taxable equivalent) |
|
$ |
5,170 |
|
|
$ |
5,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate/Volume Analysis
To enhance the understanding of the effects of volumes (the average balance of earning assets
and costing liabilities) and average interest rate fluctuations on the consolidated balance sheet
as it pertains to net interest income, the table below reflects these changes for 2011 versus 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 vs 2010 |
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
Due to |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Net |
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, tax-exempt |
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
104 |
|
Loans |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
(230 |
) |
Taxable investment securities |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
(403 |
) |
Tax-exempt investment securities |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
(596 |
) |
|
|
(490 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
NOW deposits |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Money market deposits |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Time deposits |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
(293 |
) |
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Long-term borrowings, FHLB |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
Junior subordinate debentures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(376 |
) |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net interest income |
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
(220 |
) |
|
$ |
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
2011 vs. 2010
The provision for loan losses is based upon managements quarterly review of the loan
portfolio. The purpose of the review is to assess loan quality, identify impaired loans, analyze
delinquencies, evaluate potential charge-offs and recoveries, and assess the general conditions in
the markets served. Management remains committed to an aggressive and thorough program of problem
loan identification and resolution. Annually, an independent loan review is performed for the
Bank. The allowance for loan losses is evaluated quarterly and is calculated by applying historic
loss factors to the various outstanding loans types while excluding loans for which a specific
allowance has already been determined. Loss factors are based on managements consideration of the
nature of the portfolio segments, historical loan loss experience, industry standards and trends
with respect to nonperforming loans, and its core knowledge and experience with specific loan
segments.
28
Although management believes that it uses the best information available to make such
determinations and that the allowance for loan losses is adequate at March 31, 2011, future
adjustments could be necessary if circumstances or economic conditions differ substantially from
the assumptions used in making the initial determinations. A downturn in the local economy or
employment and delays in receiving financial information from borrowers could result in increased
levels of nonperforming assets and charge-offs, increased loan loss provisions and reductions in
interest income. Also, as part of the examination process, bank regulatory agencies periodically
review the Banks loan loss allowance. The bank regulators could require the recognition of
additions to the loan loss allowance based on their judgment of information available to them at
the time of their examination.
The provision for loan losses amounted to $80,000 and $310,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Management concluded the 2011 and 2010 increases of the
provision were appropriate considering the gross loan growth experience, the level of nonperforming
assets and the general condition of the national economy. Utilizing the resources noted above,
management concluded that the allowance for loan losses remains at a level adequate to provide for
probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio.
NON-INTEREST INCOME
2011 vs. 2010
Total non-interest income increased $130,000 or 10.0 percent to $1.4 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2011. The service charges and fees decreased $12,000 or 2.8 percent to $414
thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2011. Gain on sale of loans increased $31,000 or
23.8 percent from $130,000 in 2010 to $161,000 in 2011. Brokerage income decreased $29,000 or 32.6
percent from $89,000 in 2010 to $60,000 in 2011. Trust income increased $45,000 or 26.3 percent
from $171,000 in 2010 to $216,000 in 2011. Interchange fees increased $24,000 or 12.3 percent from
$195,000 in 2010 to $219,000 in 2011. Other non-interest income increased $79,000 or 46.2 percent
from $171,000 in 2010. The increase primarily resulted from increased servicing fees on several
participated commercial loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For The Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Change |
(In Thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
% Total |
|
Amount |
|
% Total |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges and fees |
|
$ |
414 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
% |
|
$ |
426 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
% |
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
)% |
Gain on sale of loans |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
Brokerage |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(32.6 |
) |
Trust |
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
Interchange fees |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
1,428 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
2011 vs. 2010
Total non-interest expense increased $169,000 thousand or 4.3 percent from $4.0 million in
2010. The net increase primarily resulted from higher employee benefits offset by lower
amortization of core deposit intangible. Employee benefits increased $114,000 or 24.2 percent for
the three months ended March 31, 2011 as a result of higher premiums.
One standard to measure non-interest expense is to express annualized non-interest expense as
a percentage of average total assets. As of March 31, 2011 this percentage was 2.68 percent
compared to 2.64 percent in 2010.
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For The Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Change |
(In Thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
% Total |
|
Amount |
|
% Total |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
$ |
1,657 |
|
|
|
39.9 |
% |
|
$ |
1,576 |
|
|
|
39.7 |
% |
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
Employee benefits |
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
State shares tax |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Directors fees |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
FDIC assessments |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Telecommunications |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(13.5 |
) |
Amortization of core deposit intangible |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(15.9 |
) |
Automated teller machine and interchange |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
Other |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
$ |
4,144 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
3,975 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
169 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Consolidated assets at March 31, 2011 were $620.1 million which represented an increase of
$5.8 million from $614.3 million at December 31, 2010.
Gross loans increased 0.9 percent from $340.5 million at December 31, 2010 to $343.4 million
at March 31, 2011.
The loan-to-deposit ratio is a key measurement of liquidity. Our loan-to-deposit ratio
decreased during 2011 to 71.2 percent compared to 71.9 percent at December 31, 2010.
INVESTMENTS
All of our securities are available-for-sale and are carried at estimated fair value.
Available-for-sale securities are reported on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value with an
offsetting adjustment to deferred taxes. The possibility of material price volatility in a changing
interest rate environment is offset by the availability to the Corporation of restructuring the
portfolio for gap positioning at any time through the securities classified as available-for-sale.
As reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity, the impact of the
fair value accounting was an unrealized gain, net of tax, on March 31, 2011 of $1,873,000 compared
to an unrealized gain, net of tax, on December 31, 2010 of $2,221,000, which represents an
unrealized loss, net of tax, of $348,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The following
table shows the amortized cost and estimated fair value of the investment securities as of the
dates shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Obligation of U.S.Government Corporations
and Agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
$ |
118,316 |
|
|
$ |
121,279 |
|
Other |
|
|
65,538 |
|
|
|
65,308 |
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
|
|
15,417 |
|
|
|
15,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
|
199,271 |
|
|
|
202,114 |
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
2,130 |
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities AFS |
|
$ |
201,401 |
|
|
$ |
204,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Obligation of U.S.Government Corporations
and Agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
$ |
129,008 |
|
|
$ |
132,515 |
|
Other |
|
|
59,046 |
|
|
|
58,903 |
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
|
|
13,625 |
|
|
|
13,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
|
201,679 |
|
|
|
205,089 |
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
2,130 |
|
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities AFS |
|
$ |
203,809 |
|
|
$ |
207,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOANS
The loan portfolio increased 0.9 percent from $340.5 million at December 31, 2010 to $343.4
million at March 31, 2011. The percentage distribution in the loan portfolio was 79.7 percent in
real estate loans at $273.2 million; 10.4 percent in commercial loans at $35.8 million; 2.0 percent
in consumer loans at $7.2 million; and 7.9 percent in tax exempt loans at $27.2 million.
The following table presents the breakdown of loans by type as of the date indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
(In Thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
$ |
35,836 |
|
|
$ |
33,819 |
|
|
$ |
2,017 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Tax-exempt |
|
|
27,194 |
|
|
|
25,180 |
|
|
|
2,014 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
254,835 |
|
|
|
262,355 |
|
|
|
(7,520 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
Real estate construction |
|
|
18,346 |
|
|
|
11,689 |
|
|
|
6,657 |
|
|
|
57.0 |
|
Installment loans to individuals |
|
|
6,990 |
|
|
|
7,232 |
|
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
Add (deduct): Unearned discount |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(16.7 |
) |
Unamortized loan costs, net of fees |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans |
|
$ |
343,381 |
|
|
$ |
340,453 |
|
|
$ |
2,928 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the percentage distribution of loans by category as of the date
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
9.9 |
% |
Tax-exempt |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
74.4 |
|
|
|
77.2 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Installment loans to individuals |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The allowance for loan losses was $4.9 million at March 31, 2011, compared to $4.0 million at
March 31, 2010. This allowance equaled 1.42 percent and 1.19 percent of total loans, net of
unearned income, as of March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The loan loss reserve is analyzed
quarterly and reviewed by the Banks Board of Directors. No concentration or apparent
deterioration in classes of loans or pledged collateral was evident. Regular meetings with the
Banks Director Loan Committee reviewed new loans. Delinquent loans, loan exceptions and certain
large loans are addressed by the full Board no less than monthly to determine compliance with
policies. Allowance for loan losses was considered adequate based on delinquency trends and actual
loans written.
The following table presents a summary of the Banks loan loss experience as of the dates
indicated:
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
(In Thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Average Loans Outstanding during
the period |
|
$ |
342,994 |
|
|
$ |
334,755 |
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
4,801 |
|
|
$ |
4,210 |
|
Provision charged to operations |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged off: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate mortgages |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(536 |
) |
Installment loans to indiviuals |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Real estate mortgages |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Installment loans to indiviuals |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
4,858 |
|
|
$ |
3,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans
outstanding during the period |
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
|
0.16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-PERFORMING LOANS
As of March 31, 2011, loans 30 to 89 days past due totaled $2.8 million compared to $3.2
million at December 31, 2010. Non-accrual loans totaled $3.1 million at March 31, 2011 and $3.8
million at December 31, 2010.
The following table presents past due and non-accrual loans by loan type and in summary as of
the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days 30-89 |
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
Days 90 plus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual |
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days 30-89 |
|
|
2,422 |
|
|
|
2,880 |
|
Days 90 plus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual |
|
|
2,779 |
|
|
|
3,604 |
|
Installment loans to individuals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days 30-89 |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Days 90 plus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,885 |
|
|
$ |
6,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days 30-89 |
|
$ |
2,768 |
|
|
$ |
3,156 |
|
Days 90 plus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual |
|
|
3,117 |
|
|
|
3,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,885 |
|
|
$ |
6,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructured loans still accruing |
|
$ |
318 |
|
|
$ |
319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEPOSITS
Total average deposits increased by 2.0 percent from $470.1 million at December 31, 2010 to
$480.5 million at March 31, 2011. Average savings deposits increased 5.4 percent to $66.7 million
at March 31, 2011 from $63.2 million at December 31, 2010. Average money market deposits increased
7.2 percent to $45.5 million as of March 31, 2011 from $42.5 million as of December 31, 2010.
Average interest bearing NOW accounts increased 3.5 percent from $71.4 million at December 31, 2010
to $73.8 million at March 31, 2011.
32
The average balances and average rate paid on deposits are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Change |
(In Thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Rate |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
64,534 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
59,013 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
5,521 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
Savings |
|
|
66,645 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
63,223 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
3,422 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Now deposits |
|
|
73,843 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
71,374 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
2,469 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Money market deposits |
|
|
45,533 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
|
42,460 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
3,073 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
229,899 |
|
|
|
1.90 |
|
|
|
234,812 |
|
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
(4,913 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
480,454 |
|
|
|
1.03 |
% |
|
$ |
470,882 |
|
|
|
1.23 |
% |
|
$ |
9,572 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BORROWED FUNDS
Average short-term borrowings, including securities sold under agreements to repurchase and
day-to-day FHLB Pittsburgh borrowings increased 3.0 percent from $53.7 million at December 31,
2010 to $55.3 million at March 31, 2011. Average long-term borrowings decreased $3.1 million from
$13.9 million at December 31, 2010 to $10.8 million at March 31, 2011.
The average balances are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Change |
(In Thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
% Total |
|
Amount |
|
% Total |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase |
|
$ |
54,610 |
|
|
|
82.7 |
% |
|
$ |
52,315 |
|
|
|
77.4 |
% |
|
$ |
2,295 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
Short-term borrowings, FHLB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
U.S. Treasury tax and loan notes |
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(13.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term borrowings |
|
|
55,280 |
|
|
|
83.7 |
% |
|
|
53,691 |
|
|
|
79.4 |
% |
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Long-term borrowings, FHLB |
|
|
6,122 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
9,252 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
(3,130 |
) |
|
|
(33.8 |
) |
Junior subordinate debentures |
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowed funds |
|
$ |
66,042 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
67,583 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
(1,541 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings consisted of the following at March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
Ending |
|
Average |
|
Month End |
|
Average |
(In Thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
Balance |
|
Balance |
|
Rate |
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements
to repurchase |
|
$ |
54,195 |
|
|
$ |
54,610 |
|
|
$ |
56,844 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
% |
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
U.S. Treasury tax and loan notes |
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
55,060 |
|
|
$ |
55,280 |
|
|
$ |
57,844 |
|
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
Ending |
|
Average |
|
Month End |
|
Average |
(In Thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
Balance |
|
Balance |
|
Rate |
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to repurchase |
|
$ |
48,681 |
|
|
$ |
49,042 |
|
|
$ |
50,832 |
|
|
|
0.83 |
% |
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,135 |
|
|
|
4,075 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
% |
U.S. Treasury tax and loan notes |
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
49,250 |
|
|
$ |
52,727 |
|
|
$ |
55,476 |
|
|
|
0.82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIQUIDITY
Liquidity management is required to ensure that adequate funds will be available to meet
anticipated and unanticipated deposit withdrawals, debt service payments, investment commitments,
commercial and consumer loan demand, and ongoing operating expenses. Funding sources include
principal repayments on loans, sale of assets, growth in time and core deposits, short and
long-term
33
borrowings, investment securities coming due, loan prepayments and repurchase agreements.
Regular loan payments are a dependable source of funds, while the sale of investment securities,
deposit growth and loan prepayments are significantly influenced by general economic conditions and
the level of interest rates.
We manage liquidity on a daily basis. We believe that our liquidity is sufficient to meet
present and future financial obligations and commitments on a timely basis. However, see potential
liquidity risk factors at Item 1A Risk Factors and refer to Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows in this Form 10-Q.
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Capital continues to be a strength for the Bank. Capital is critical as it must provide
growth, payment to shareholders, and absorption of unforeseen losses. The federal regulators
provide standards that must be met.
As of March 31, 2011, the Bank was categorized as well-capitalized under the regulatory
framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well-capitalized, the Bank must
maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios.
Our actual consolidated capital amounts and ratios as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010
are in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
(In Thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
Total Capital
(to Risk-weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
$ |
65,705 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
$ |
64,476 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
% |
For Capital Adequacy Purposes |
|
|
28,168 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
27,884 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
To Be Well-Capitalized |
|
|
35,210 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
34,855 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I Capital
(to Risk-weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
$ |
61,303 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
$ |
60,114 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
% |
For Capital Adequacy Purposes |
|
|
14,084 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
13,942 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
To Be Well-Capitalized |
|
|
21,126 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
20,913 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I Capital
(to Average Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
$ |
61,303 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
$ |
60,114 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
For Capital Adequacy Purposes |
|
|
24,299 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
24,034 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
To Be Well-Capitalized |
|
|
30,374 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
30,043 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Our capital ratios are not materially different from those of the Bank.
INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT
Interest rate risk management involves managing the extent to which interest-sensitive assets
and interest-sensitive liabilities are matched. Interest rate sensitivity is the relationship
between market interest rates and earnings volatility due to the repricing characteristics of
assets and liabilities. The Banks net interest income is affected by changes in the level of
market interest rates. In order to maintain consistent earnings performance, the Bank seeks to
manage, to the extent possible, the repricing characteristics of its assets and liabilities.
One major objective of the Bank when managing the rate sensitivity of its assets and
liabilities is to stabilize net interest income. The management of and authority to assume
interest rate risk is the responsibility of the Banks Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO), which is
comprised of senior management and Board members. ALCO meets quarterly to monitor the ratio of
interest sensitive assets to interest sensitive liabilities. The process to review interest rate
risk management is a regular part of management of the Bank. Consistent policies and practices of
measuring and reporting interest rate risk exposure, particularly regarding the treatment of
noncontractual assets and liabilities, are in effect. In addition, there is an annual process to
review the interest rate risk policy with the Board of Directors which includes limits on the
impact to earnings from shifts in interest rates.
The ratio between assets and liabilities repricing in specific time intervals is referred to
as an interest rate sensitivity gap. Interest rate sensitivity gaps can be managed to take
advantage of the slope of the yield curve as well as forecasted changes in the level of interest
rate changes.
To manage the interest sensitivity position, an asset/liability model called gap analysis is
used to monitor the difference in the volume of the Banks interest sensitive assets and
liabilities that mature or reprice within given periods. A positive gap (asset sensitive)
indicates that more assets reprice during a given period compared to liabilities, while a negative
gap (liability sensitive) has the opposite effect. The Bank employs computerized net interest
income simulation modeling to assist in quantifying interest rate risk exposure. This process
measures and quantifies the impact on net interest income through varying interest rate changes and
balance
34
sheet compositions. The use of this model assists the ALCO to gauge the effects of the
interest rate changes on interest sensitive assets and liabilities in order to determine what
impact these rate changes will have upon our net interest spread.
At March 31, 2011, our cumulative gap positions and the potential earnings change resulting
from a 300 basis point change in rates were both within the internal risk management guidelines.
In addition to gap analysis, the Bank uses earnings simulation to assist in measuring and
controlling interest rate risk. The Bank also simulates the impact on net interest income of plus
and minus 100, 200 and 300 basis point rate shocks. The results of these theoretical rate shocks
provide an additional tool to help manage the Banks interest rate risk.
It is our opinion that the asset/liability mix and the interest rate risk associated with the
balance sheet is within manageable parameters. Additionally, the Banks Asset/Liability Committee
meets quarterly with an investment consultant.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
In the normal course of conducting business activities, the Corporation is exposed to market
risk, principally interest rate risk, through the operations of its banking subsidiary. Interest
rate risk arises from market driven fluctuations in interest rates that affect cash flows, income,
expense and values of financial instruments and was discussed previously in this Form 10-Q.
No material changes in market risk occurred during the current period. A detailed discussion
of market risk is provided in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2010.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a 15(e) and 15d 15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), based on their evaluation of these controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Report, were effective as of such date at
the reasonable assurance level as discussed below to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports we file under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and
forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls and
internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of
the system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of
controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any,
within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that
judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error
or mistake. In addition, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by
collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls.
The CEO and CFO have evaluated the changes to our internal controls over financial reporting
that occurred during our fiscal Quarter Ended March 31, 2011, as required by paragraph (d) Rules
13a 15 and 15d 15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and have concluded
that there were no changes that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Management and the Corporations legal counsel are not aware of any litigation that would have
a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position of the Corporation. There are no
proceedings pending other than the ordinary routine litigation incident to the business of the
Corporation and its subsidiary, First Columbia Bank & Trust Co. In addition, no material
proceedings are pending or are known to be threatened or contemplated against the Corporation and
the Bank by government authorities.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1.A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2010, which could materially affect our business, financial condition
or future results. At March 31, 2011 the risk factors of the Corporation have not changed
materially from those in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, except as set forth below. The risks
described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks that we face. Additional risks
and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may
materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act may affect our financial
condition, results of operations, liquidity and stock price.
On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or the
Dodd-Frank Act, was signed into law. The Dodd-Frank Act includes provisions affecting large and
small financial institutions, including several provisions that will profoundly affect how
community banks and bank holding companies will be regulated in the future. Among other things,
these provisions relax rules regarding interstate branching, allow financial institutions to pay
interest on business checking accounts, change the scope of federal deposit insurance coverage, and
impose new capital requirements on bank holding companies. In addition, there
is
35
significant uncertainty about the full impact of the Dodd-Frank Act because many of its
provisions require subsequent regulatory rule making.
The Dodd-Frank Act establishes the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection as an independent
entity within the Federal Reserve, which will be given authority to promulgate consumer protection
regulations applicable to all entities offering financial services or products, including banks.
Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act includes a series of provisions covering mortgage loan origination
standards affecting, among other things, originator compensation, minimum repayment standards, and
pre-payments.
The Dodd-Frank Act contains numerous other provisions affecting financial institutions of all
types, many of which may have an impact on the companys operating environment in substantial and
unpredictable ways. Consequently, the Dodd-Frank Act is likely to affect our cost of doing
business, it may limit or expand the activities in which the Company permissibly may engage, and it
may affect the competitive balance within the companys industry and market areas.
The Dodd-Frank Act and the regulations to be adopted thereunder are expected to subject the
company and other financial institutions to additional restrictions, oversight and costs that may
have an adverse impact on its business, financial condition, results of operations or the price of
the Companys common stock and the Companys ability to continue to conduct business consistent
with historical practices.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Average |
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
Number of |
|
Price Paid |
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
Approximate Dollar Value) |
|
|
Shares (or |
|
per Share |
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
of Shares (or Units) that |
|
|
Units) |
|
(or Units) |
|
Publicly Announced |
|
May Yet Be Purchased |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Purchased |
|
Plans or Programs (1) |
|
Under the Plans or Programs |
Month #1 (January 1 January 31, 2011) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month #2 (February 1 February 28, 2011) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month #3 (March 1 March 31, 2011) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,000 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This program was announced in 2009 and represents the third buy-back program. The
Board of Directors approved the purchase of 200,000 shares. There was no expiration date
associated with this program. |
|
|
The Corporation did not sell any unregistered securities during the quarter ended March 31,
2011. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
3.1.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation-incorporated by reference to Registrants
Current Report on Form 10-K, dated May 9, 2005, filed with the Commission on May 10, 2005. |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended Bylaws-incorporated by reference to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed
with the commission on March 26, 2010. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer |
36
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCFNB BANCORP, INC. |
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By |
|
/s/ Lance O. Diehl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lance O. Diehl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and CEO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
Date: May 10, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By |
|
/s/ Jeffrey T. Arnold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey T. Arnold, CPA, CIA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
Date: May 10, 2011 |
|
|
37