e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended July 2, 2011.
Or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 000-06217
INTEL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-1672743 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
2200 Mission College Boulevard, Santa Clara, California
|
|
95054-1549 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(408) 765-8080
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and
posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required
to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of
this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Shares outstanding of the Registrants common stock:
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding as of July 29, 2011 |
Common stock, $0.001 par value
|
|
5,251 million |
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INTEL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
(In Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
13,032 |
|
|
$ |
10,765 |
|
|
$ |
25,879 |
|
|
$ |
21,064 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
5,130 |
|
|
|
3,530 |
|
|
|
10,092 |
|
|
|
7,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
7,902 |
|
|
|
7,235 |
|
|
|
15,787 |
|
|
|
13,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
3,902 |
|
|
|
3,230 |
|
Marketing, general and administrative |
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
|
3,680 |
|
|
|
3,098 |
|
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
3,967 |
|
|
|
3,254 |
|
|
|
7,694 |
|
|
|
6,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
3,935 |
|
|
|
3,981 |
|
|
|
8,093 |
|
|
|
7,429 |
|
Gains (losses) on equity method investments, net |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
Gains (losses) on other equity investments, net |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
Interest and other, net |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
3,931 |
|
|
|
4,185 |
|
|
|
8,302 |
|
|
|
7,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for taxes |
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
2,188 |
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,954 |
|
|
$ |
2,887 |
|
|
$ |
6,114 |
|
|
$ |
5,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.3624 |
|
|
$ |
0.3150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
5,294 |
|
|
|
5,563 |
|
|
|
5,376 |
|
|
|
5,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
5,441 |
|
|
|
5,711 |
|
|
|
5,527 |
|
|
|
5,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
2
INTEL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
Dec. 25, |
|
(In Millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
4,635 |
|
|
$ |
5,498 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
3,106 |
|
|
|
11,294 |
|
Trading assets |
|
|
3,806 |
|
|
|
5,093 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
3,359 |
|
|
|
2,867 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
4,030 |
|
|
|
3,757 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
|
1,488 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
2,193 |
|
|
|
1,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
23,102 |
|
|
|
31,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated
depreciation of $34,093 ($32,582 as of December 25, 2010) |
|
|
20,778 |
|
|
|
17,899 |
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
Other long-term investments |
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
3,026 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
9,141 |
|
|
|
4,531 |
|
Identified intangible assets, net |
|
|
6,700 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
4,484 |
|
|
|
4,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
66,089 |
|
|
$ |
63,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
2,742 |
|
|
|
2,290 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
2,111 |
|
|
|
2,888 |
|
Accrued advertising |
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
Deferred income |
|
|
1,824 |
|
|
|
747 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
10,354 |
|
|
|
9,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term income taxes payable |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,090 |
|
|
|
2,077 |
|
Long-term deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
2,215 |
|
|
|
926 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
2,519 |
|
|
|
1,236 |
|
Contingencies (Note 26) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and capital in excess of par value, 5,285 shares issued and outstanding
(5,581 issued and 5,511 outstanding as of December 25, 2010) |
|
|
16,245 |
|
|
|
16,178 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
32,012 |
|
|
|
32,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
48,723 |
|
|
|
49,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
66,089 |
|
|
$ |
63,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
3
INTEL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
(In Millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
$ |
5,498 |
|
|
$ |
3,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used for) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
6,114 |
|
|
|
5,329 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
2,535 |
|
|
|
2,166 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
Net loss on retirement of assets |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment arrangements |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
(Gains) losses on equity method investments, net |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
(Gains) losses on other equity investments, net |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
(Gains) losses on divestitures |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(395 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
(832 |
) |
|
|
(513 |
) |
Income taxes payable and receivable |
|
|
(466 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Other assets and liabilities |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
2,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
7,984 |
|
|
|
7,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used for) investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(5,207 |
) |
|
|
(1,976 |
) |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(8,291 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
Purchases of available-for-sale investments |
|
|
(5,213 |
) |
|
|
(6,863 |
) |
Sales of available-for-sale investments |
|
|
8,754 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
Maturities of available-for-sale investments |
|
|
7,087 |
|
|
|
5,625 |
|
Purchases of trading assets |
|
|
(3,820 |
) |
|
|
(4,791 |
) |
Maturities and sales of trading assets |
|
|
5,258 |
|
|
|
3,571 |
|
Origination of loans receivable |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(439 |
) |
Investments in non-marketable equity investments |
|
|
(295 |
) |
|
|
(169 |
) |
Return of equity method investments |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
Proceeds from divestitures |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other investing |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(1,427 |
) |
|
|
(4,642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used for) financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in short-term debt, net |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Proceeds from government grants |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment arrangements |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Proceeds from sales of shares through employee equity incentive plans |
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(6,180 |
) |
|
|
(219 |
) |
Payment of dividends to stockholders |
|
|
(1,955 |
) |
|
|
(1,747 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing activities |
|
|
(7,433 |
) |
|
|
(1,396 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(863 |
) |
|
|
1,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
4,635 |
|
|
$ |
5,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes, net of refunds |
|
$ |
2,596 |
|
|
$ |
2,359 |
|
See accompanying notes.
4
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
Note 1: Basis of Presentation
We prepared our interim consolidated condensed financial statements that accompany these notes in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, consistent in all material respects
with those applied in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2010.
We have a 52- or 53-week fiscal year that ends on the last Saturday in December. Fiscal year 2011
is a 53-week fiscal year, and the first quarter of 2011 was a 14-week quarter. Fiscal year 2010 was
a 52-week fiscal year, and the first quarter of 2010 was a 13-week quarter.
In the first quarter of 2011, we completed the acquisition of McAfee, Inc. (for further
information, see Note 15: Acquisitions). Certain of the operations acquired from McAfee have a
functional currency other than the U.S. dollar. As a result, translation adjustments have been
recorded through accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) beginning in 2011.
We have made estimates and judgments affecting the amounts reported in our consolidated condensed
financial statements and the accompanying notes. The actual results that we experience may differ
materially from our estimates. The accounting estimates that require our most significant,
difficult, and subjective judgments include:
|
|
|
the valuation of non-marketable equity investments and the determination of
other-than-temporary impairments; |
|
|
|
|
the assessment of recoverability of long-lived assets (property, plant and
equipment; goodwill; and identified intangibles); |
|
|
|
|
the recognition and measurement of current and deferred income taxes (including
the measurement of uncertain tax positions); |
|
|
|
|
the valuation of inventory; and |
|
|
|
|
the recognition and measurement of loss contingencies. |
The interim financial information is unaudited, but reflects all normal adjustments that are, in
our opinion, necessary to provide a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented.
This interim information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2010.
Note 2: Accounting Policies
We have adopted additional revenue recognition accounting policies as they apply to the acquired
McAfee business. Revenue from license agreements with our McAfee business generally includes
service and support agreements for which the related revenue is deferred and recognized ratably
over the performance period. Revenue derived from online subscription products is deferred and
recognized ratably over the performance period. Professional services revenue is recognized as
services are performed or if required, upon customer acceptance. For arrangements with multiple
elements, including software licenses, maintenance, and/or services, revenue is allocated across
the separately identified deliverables and may be recognized or deferred. When vendor-specific
objective evidence (VSOE) does not exist for undelivered elements such as maintenance and support,
the entire arrangement fee is recognized ratably over the performance period. Direct costs, such as
costs related to revenue-sharing and royalty arrangements associated with license arrangements, as
well as component costs associated with product revenue, are deferred and amortized over the same
period that the related revenue is recognized.
Note 3: Accounting Changes
In the first quarter of 2011, we adopted new standards for revenue recognition with multiple
deliverables. These new standards change the determination of whether the individual deliverables
included in a multiple-element arrangement may be treated as separate units for accounting
purposes. Additionally, these new standards modify the method by which revenue is allocated to the
separately identified deliverables. The adoption of these new standards did not have a significant
impact on our consolidated condensed financial statements.
In the first quarter of 2011, we adopted new standards that remove certain tangible products and
associated software from the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance. The adoption of
these new standards did not have a significant impact on our consolidated condensed financial
statements.
5
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
Note 4: Recent Accounting Standards
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amended standards to achieve a
consistent definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about
fair value between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. For assets and
liabilities categorized as Level 3 and recognized at fair value, these amended standards require
disclosure of quantitative information about unobservable inputs, a description of the valuation
processes used by the entity, and a qualitative discussion about the sensitivity of the
measurements. In addition, these amended standards require that we disclose the level in the fair
value hierarchy for financial instruments disclosed at fair value but not recorded at fair value.
These new standards are effective for us beginning in the first quarter of 2012; early adoption of
these standards is prohibited. We do not expect these new standards to significantly impact our
consolidated condensed financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued amended standards to increase the prominence of items reported in
other comprehensive income. These amendments eliminate the option to present components of other
comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders equity and require that
all changes in stockholders equityexcept investments by, and distributions to, ownersbe
presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but
consecutive statements. In addition, these amendments require that we present on the face of the
financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other
comprehensive income to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the
components of other comprehensive income are presented. These new standards are effective for us
beginning in the first quarter of 2012 and are to be applied retrospectively. These amended
standards will impact the presentation of other comprehensive income but will not impact our
financial position or results of operations.
Note 5: Fair Value
Fair value is the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When
determining fair value, we consider the principal or most advantageous market in which we would
transact, and we consider assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or
liability. Our financial assets and liabilities are measured and recorded at fair value, except for
equity method investments, cost method investments, cost method loans receivable, and most of our
liabilities.
Fair Value Hierarchy
The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level 1. Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2. Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities, quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less
active markets), or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can
be derived principally from or corroborated with observable market data for substantially the full
term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs also include non-binding market consensus prices
that can be corroborated with observable market data, as well as quoted prices that were adjusted
for security-specific restrictions.
Level 3. Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement
of the fair value of assets or liabilities. Level 3 inputs also include non-binding market
consensus prices or non-binding broker quotes that we were unable to corroborate with observable
market data.
Marketable Debt Instruments
Marketable debt instruments include instruments such as commercial paper, corporate bonds,
government bonds, bank deposits, asset-backed securities, municipal bonds, and money market fund
deposits. When we use observable market prices for identical securities that are traded in less
active markets, we classify our marketable debt instruments as Level 2. When observable market
prices for identical securities are not available, we price our marketable debt instruments using
non-binding market consensus prices that are corroborated with observable market data; quoted
market prices for similar instruments; or pricing models, such as a discounted cash flow model,
with all significant inputs derived from or corroborated with observable market data. Non-binding
market consensus prices are based on the proprietary valuation models of pricing providers or
brokers. These valuation models incorporate a number of inputs, including non-binding and binding
broker quotes; observable market prices for identical or similar securities; and the internal
assumptions of pricing providers or brokers that use observable market inputs and, to a lesser
degree, unobservable market inputs. We corroborate non-binding market consensus prices with
observable market data using statistical models when observable market data exists. The discounted
cash flow model uses observable market inputs, such as LIBOR-based yield curves, currency spot and
forward rates, and credit ratings.
6
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
Our marketable debt instruments that are classified as Level 3 are classified as such due to the
lack of observable market data to corroborate either the non-binding market consensus prices or the
non-binding broker quotes. When observable market data is not available, we corroborate non-binding
market consensus prices and non-binding broker quotes using available unobservable data.
Assets/Liabilities Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis consisted of the
following types of instruments as of July 2, 2011 and December 25, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, 2011 |
|
|
December 25, 2010 |
|
|
|
Fair Value Measured and Recorded at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measured and Recorded at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting Date Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting Date Using |
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,272 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,272 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,600 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,600 |
|
Bank deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
560 |
|
Money market fund deposits |
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
Government bonds |
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
1,279 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,712 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
Government bonds |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
4,890 |
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,210 |
|
Bank deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
858 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Trading assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government bonds |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
1,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,952 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
2,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,426 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
942 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
488 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
Bank deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
Money market fund deposits |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
388 |
|
Other current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330 |
|
Loans receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
Other long-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
755 |
|
Government bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
2,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,085 |
|
Bank deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Other long-term assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
642 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured and
recorded at fair value |
|
$ |
2,637 |
|
|
$ |
10,963 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
$ |
13,899 |
|
|
$ |
8,197 |
|
|
$ |
17,885 |
|
|
$ |
339 |
|
|
$ |
26,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other accrued liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
201 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
208 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
Other long-term liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities measured and
recorded at fair value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
$ |
385 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government bonds include bonds issued or deemed to be guaranteed by government entities, such as
instruments issued by non-U.S. governments, U.S. Treasury securities, Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC)-insured corporate bonds, and U.S. agency securities.
7
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
The tables below present reconciliations for all assets and liabilities measured and recorded at
fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the six months
ended July 2, 2011 and for the twelve months ended December 25, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measured and Recorded Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Asset-Backed |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
Total Gains |
|
(In Millions) |
|
Bonds |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
Balance as of December 25, 2010 |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total gains or losses (realized and unrealized): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements and maturities |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers out of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 2, 2011 |
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
205 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in unrealized gains or losses included in
earnings related to
assets and liabilities still held
as of July 2, 2011 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measured and Recorded Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Asset-Backed |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
Total Gains |
|
(In Millions) |
|
Bonds |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
Balance as of December 26, 2009 |
|
$ |
369 |
|
|
$ |
754 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
(65 |
) |
|
$ |
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total gains or losses (realized and unrealized): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements and maturities |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(484 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers out of Level 3 |
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 25, 2010 |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in unrealized gains or losses included in
earnings related to assets and liabilities still held
as of December 25, 2010 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
For all periods presented, gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings were
primarily reported outside of operating income. During 2010, we transferred corporate bonds from
Level 3 to Level 2 due to improved availability of observable market data and non-binding market
consensus prices to value or corroborate the value of these instruments. Our policy is to reflect
transfers in and transfers out at the beginning of the quarter in which a change in circumstances
resulted in the transfer.
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets/Liabilities
We elected the fair value option for loans made to third parties when the interest rate or foreign
exchange rate risk was hedged at inception with a related derivative instrument. As of July 2,
2011, the fair value of our loans receivable for which we elected the fair value option did not
significantly differ from the contractual principal balance based on the contractual currency.
These loans receivable are classified within other long-term assets and other current assets. Fair
value is determined using a discounted cash flow model with all significant inputs derived from or
corroborated with observable market data. Gains and losses from changes in fair value on the loans
receivable and related derivative instruments, as well as interest income, are recorded in interest
and other, net. During the three and six months ended July 2, 2011, changes in the fair value of
our loans receivable were largely offset by changes in the related derivative instruments,
resulting in an insignificant net impact on our consolidated condensed statements of income. Gains
and losses attributable to changes in credit risk are determined using observable credit default
spreads for the issuer or comparable companies and were insignificant during the three and six
months ended July 2, 2011. We did not elect the fair value option for loans when the interest rate
or foreign exchange rate risk was not hedged at inception with a related derivative instrument.
8
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
We elected this fair value option for the bonds issued in 2007 by the Industrial Development
Authority of the City of Chandler, Arizona (2007 Arizona bonds). In connection with the 2007
Arizona bonds, we entered into a total return swap agreement that effectively converts the
fixed-rate obligation on the bonds to a floating U.S.-dollar LIBOR-based rate. As a result, changes
in the fair value of this debt are largely offset by changes in the fair value of the total return
swap agreement, without the need to apply hedge accounting provisions. The 2007 Arizona bonds are
included in long-term debt. As of July 2, 2011 and December 25, 2010, no other instruments were
similar to the 2007 Arizona bonds for which we elected fair value treatment.
As of July 2, 2011, the fair value of the 2007 Arizona bonds did not significantly differ from the
contractual principal balance. The fair value of the 2007 Arizona bonds was determined using inputs
that are observable in the market or that can be derived from or corroborated with observable
market data, as well as unobservable inputs that were significant to the fair value. Gains and
losses on the 2007 Arizona bonds and the related total return swap are recorded in interest and
other, net. We capitalize interest associated with the 2007 Arizona bonds. We add capitalized
interest to the cost of qualified assets and amortize it over the estimated useful lives of the
assets.
Assets Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
Our non-marketable equity investments and non-financial assets, such as intangible assets and
property, plant and equipment, are recorded at fair value only if an impairment charge is
recognized. The following table presents the financial instruments and non-financial assets that
were measured and recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the six months ended July
2, 2011, and the gains (losses) recorded during the three and six months ended July 2, 2011 on
those assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gains |
|
|
Total Gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses) for |
|
|
(Losses) for |
|
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Value as of |
|
|
Fair Value Measured and Recorded Using |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
(In Millions) |
|
July 2, 2011 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
July 2, 2011 |
|
|
July 2, 2011 |
|
Non-marketable equity investments |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) for assets held
as of July 2, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) for property, plant and
equipment
no longer held |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) for recorded
non-recurring
measurement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the financial instruments and non-financial assets that were measured
and recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the six months ended June 26, 2010, and
the gains (losses) recorded during the three and six months ended June 26, 2010 on those assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gains |
|
|
Total Gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses) for |
|
|
(Losses) for |
|
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Value as of |
|
|
Fair Value Measured and Recorded Using |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
(In Millions) |
|
June 26, 2010 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
June 26, 2010 |
|
|
June 26, 2010 |
|
Non-marketable equity investments |
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) for assets held
as of June 26, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) for property, plant and
equipment
no longer held |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) for recorded
non-recurring
measurement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(24 |
) |
|
$ |
(103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the preceding tables, the carrying value of our impaired non-marketable equity investments at
the end of the period may not equal our fair value measurement at the time of impairment due to the
subsequent recognition of equity method adjustments. In addition, the carrying value of our
impaired property, plant and equipment at the end of the period may not equal our fair value
measurement at the time of impairment due to the subsequent recognition of depreciation expense.
9
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
A portion of our non-marketable equity investments were measured and recorded at fair value in the
first half of 2011 and 2010 due to events or circumstances that significantly impacted the fair
value of those investments, resulting in other-than-temporary impairment charges. We classified
these measurements as Level 3, as we used unobservable inputs to the valuation methodologies that
were significant to the fair value measurements, and the valuations required management judgment
due to the absence of quoted market prices. We determine the fair value of our non-marketable
equity investments using the market and income approaches. The market approach includes the use of
financial metrics and ratios of comparable public companies. The selection of comparable companies
requires management judgment and is based on a number of factors, including comparable companies
sizes, growth rates, industries, development stages, and other relevant factors. The income
approach includes the use of a discounted cash flow model, which requires the following significant
estimates for the investee: revenue, based on assumed market segment size and assumed market
segment share; costs; and discount rates based on the risk profile of comparable companies.
Estimates of market segment size, market segment share, and costs are developed using historical
data and available market data. The valuation of these non-marketable equity investments also takes
into account variables such as conditions reflected in the capital markets, recent financing
activities by the investees, the investees capital structure, and the terms of the investees
issued interests.
Additionally, certain of our property, plant and equipment was measured and recorded at fair value
during the first half of 2011 and 2010 due to events or circumstances we identified that indicated
that the carrying value of the assets or the asset grouping was not recoverable, resulting in
impairment charges. Most of these asset impairments related to manufacturing assets.
Financial Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
We measure the fair value of our non-marketable equity investments, marketable equity method
investment, debt carried at amortized cost, and cost method loans receivable quarterly for
disclosure purposes; however, they are recorded at fair value only when an impairment charge is
recognized. The carrying amounts and fair values of financial instruments not recorded at fair
value on a recurring basis as of July 2, 2011 and December 25, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, 2011 |
|
|
December 25, 2010 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
(In Millions) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
Non-marketable equity investments |
|
$ |
2,713 |
|
|
$ |
5,725 |
|
|
$ |
2,633 |
|
|
$ |
5,144 |
|
Marketable equity method investment |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
Loans receivable |
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
$ |
208 |
|
|
$ |
208 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,962 |
|
|
$ |
2,204 |
|
|
$ |
1,949 |
|
|
$ |
2,283 |
|
As of July 2, 2011 and December 25, 2010, the unrealized loss position of our non-marketable equity
investments was not significant.
Our marketable equity method investment is our ownership interest in SMART Technologies, Inc. The
fair value of our ownership interest in SMART was $103 million based on the quoted closing stock
price as of July 2, 2011 ($167 million as of December 25, 2010).
The carrying amount and fair value of loans receivable exclude loans measured and recorded at a
fair value of $687 million as of July 2, 2011 ($642 million as of December 25, 2010). The carrying
amount and fair value of long-term debt exclude long-term debt measured and recorded at a fair
value of $128 million as of July 2, 2011 ($128 million as of December 25, 2010).
The fair value of our loans receivable is determined using a discounted cash flow model, with all
significant inputs derived from or corroborated with observable market data. The fair value of our
long-term debt takes into consideration variables such as credit-rating changes and interest rate
changes. The credit quality of our loans receivable remains high, with credit ratings of BBB+/A2 or
better as of July 2, 2011.
In addition to the financial instruments in the table above, we incurred a liability as result of
entering into a long-term patent cross-license agreement with NVIDIA Corporation in January 2011.
We agreed to make payments to NVIDIA over six years. For further information on the payment terms
and recognition of licensed technology intangible assets, see Note 18: Identified Intangible
Assets. As of July 2, 2011, the carrying amount of the liability arising from the agreement was
$1.1 billion and is classified within other accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities, as
applicable. The fair value of the liability arising from the NVIDIA cross-license agreement
approximates the carrying amount. The fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow model,
with all significant inputs derived from or corroborated with observable market data.
10
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
Note 6: Trading Assets
Trading assets as of July 2, 2011 and December 25, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
Dec. 25, |
|
(In Millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Marketable debt instruments |
|
$ |
3,796 |
|
|
$ |
4,705 |
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading assets |
|
$ |
3,806 |
|
|
$ |
5,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gains on marketable debt instruments classified as trading assets still held at the reporting
date were $16 million in the second quarter of 2011 and $66 million in the first half of 2011 (net
losses of $173 million in the second quarter of 2010 and $234 million in the first half of 2010).
Net losses on the related derivatives were $13 million in the second quarter of 2011 and $53
million in the first half of 2011 (net gains of $143 million in the second quarter of 2010 and $191
million in the first half of 2010).
Net losses on marketable equity securities classified as trading assets still held at the reporting
date, excluding the impacts of the related derivatives, were insignificant in the second quarter of
2011 and in the first half of 2011 (net gains of $38 million in the second quarter of 2010 and
first half of 2010).
In 2010, we sold our ownership in Numonyx B.V. to Micron Technology, Inc. The Micron common stock
we received in the transaction was classified as marketable equity securities within trading
assets. During the second quarter of 2011, we sold our remaining shares in Micron.
Note 7: Available-for-Sale Investments
Available-for-sale investments as of July 2, 2011 and December 25, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, 2011 |
|
|
December 25, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Adjusted |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(In Millions) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Commercial paper |
|
$ |
3,777 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,777 |
|
|
$ |
5,312 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,312 |
|
Government bonds |
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
10,075 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
10,079 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
1,332 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
2,255 |
|
Bank deposits |
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,551 |
|
Marketable equity
securities |
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1,008 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
67 |
|
Money market fund
deposits |
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale
investments |
|
$ |
8,609 |
|
|
$ |
582 |
|
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
9,166 |
|
|
$ |
19,677 |
|
|
$ |
648 |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
20,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the preceding table, government bonds include bonds issued or deemed to be guaranteed by
government entities, such as instruments issued by non-U.S. governments, U.S. Treasury securities,
FDIC-insured corporate bonds, and U.S. agency securities. Bank deposits were primarily issued by
institutions outside the U.S. as of July 2, 2011 and December 25, 2010.
The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale debt investments as of July 2, 2011, by
contractual maturity, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Due in 1 year or less |
|
$ |
6,726 |
|
|
$ |
6,724 |
|
Due in 12 years |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
Due in 25 years |
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
Due after 5 years |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Instruments not due at a single maturity date |
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,275 |
|
|
$ |
8,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruments not due at a single maturity date in the table above includes asset-backed securities
and money market fund deposits.
11
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
We sold available-for-sale investments for proceeds of $1.2 billion in the second quarter of 2011
and $8.8 billion in the first half of 2011 ($44 million in the second quarter of 2010 and $337
million in the first half of 2010). Substantially all of the proceeds in the first half of 2011
were from debt investments that were primarily used to fund our acquisition of McAfee. The gross
realized gains on sales of available-for-sale investments were $36 million in the second quarter of
2011 and $64 million in the first half of 2011 ($12 million in the second quarter of 2010 and $79
million in the first half of 2010) and were primarily related to our sales of marketable equity
securities. We determine the cost of an investment sold on an average cost basis at the individual
security level.
The before-tax net unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments that have
been included in other comprehensive income (loss) and the before-tax net gains (losses)
reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
(In Millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) included in
other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
Net gains (losses) reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) into earnings |
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
Note 8: Inventories
Inventories at the end of each period were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
Dec. 25, |
|
(In Millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
546 |
|
|
$ |
471 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
|
1,887 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
2,034 |
|
|
|
1,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
4,030 |
|
|
$ |
3,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9: Derivative Financial Instruments
Our primary objective for holding derivative financial instruments is to manage currency exchange
rate risk and interest rate risk, and, to a lesser extent, equity market risk and commodity price
risk. We currently do not hold derivative instruments for the purpose of managing credit risk since
we limit the amount of credit exposure to any one counterparty and generally enter into derivative
transactions with high-credit-quality counterparties. We also enter into master netting
arrangements with counterparties when possible to mitigate credit risk in derivative transactions.
A master netting arrangement may allow counterparties to net settle amounts owed to each other as a
result of multiple, separate derivative transactions. For presentation on our consolidated
condensed balance sheets, we do not offset fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments
under master netting arrangements.
Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We are exposed to currency exchange rate risk and generally hedge our exposures with currency
forward contracts, currency options, or currency interest rate swaps. Substantially all of our
revenue is transacted in U.S. dollars. However, a significant amount of our operating expenditures
and capital purchases are incurred in or exposed to other currencies, primarily the Japanese yen,
the euro, and the Israeli shekel. We have established balance sheet and forecasted transaction
currency risk management programs to protect against fluctuations in fair value and the volatility
of future cash flows caused by changes in exchange rates. Our non-U.S.-dollar-denominated
investments in debt instruments and loans receivable are generally hedged with offsetting currency
forward contracts or currency interest rate swaps. These programs reduce, but do not entirely
eliminate, the impact of currency exchange movements.
Our currency risk management programs include:
|
|
|
Currency derivatives with cash flow hedge accounting designation that utilize
currency forward contracts and currency options to hedge exposures to the variability in
the U.S.-dollar equivalent of anticipated non-U.S.-dollar-denominated cash flows. These
instruments generally mature within 12 months. All of our currency forward contracts are
settled at maturity involving one cash-payment exchange. For these derivatives, we report
the after-tax gain or loss from the effective portion of the hedge as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassify it into earnings in the same
period or periods in which the hedged transaction affects earnings, and in the same line
item on the consolidated condensed statements of income as the impact of the hedged
transaction. |
12
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
|
|
|
Currency derivatives without hedge accounting designation that utilize currency
forward contracts, or currency interest rate swaps to economically hedge the functional
currency equivalent cash flows of recognized monetary assets and liabilities,
non-U.S.-dollar-denominated debt instruments classified as trading assets, and hedges of
non-U.S.-dollar-denominated loans receivable recognized at fair value. The majority of
these instruments mature within 12 months. The currency interest rate swaps are settled at
various interest payment times involving cash payments at each interest and principal
payment date with the majority of the contracts having quarterly payments. Changes in the
U.S.-dollar-equivalent cash flows of the underlying assets and liabilities are
approximately offset by the changes in fair values of the related derivatives. We record
net gains or losses in the line item on the consolidated condensed statements of income
most closely associated with the related exposures, primarily in interest and other, net,
except for equity-related gains or losses, which we primarily record in gains (losses) on
other equity investments, net. |
Interest Rate Risk
Our primary objective for holding investments in debt instruments is to preserve principal while
maximizing yields. We generally swap the returns on our investments in fixed-rate debt instruments
with remaining maturities longer than six months into U.S.-dollar three-month LIBOR-based returns,
unless management specifically approves otherwise. These swaps are settled at various interest
payment times involving cash payments at each interest and principal payment date, with the
majority of the contracts having quarterly payments.
Our interest rate risk management programs include:
|
|
|
Interest rate derivatives with cash flow hedge accounting designation that
utilize interest rate swap agreements to modify the interest characteristics of debt
instruments. For these derivatives, we report the after-tax gain or loss from the effective
portion of the hedge as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and
reclassify it into earnings in the same period or periods in which the hedged transaction
affects earnings, and in the same line item on the consolidated condensed statements of
income as the impact of the hedged transaction. |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate derivatives without hedge accounting designation that utilize
interest rate swaps and currency interest rate swaps in economic hedging transactions,
including hedges of non-U.S.-dollar-denominated debt instruments classified as trading
assets and hedges of non-U.S.-dollar-denominated loans receivable recognized at fair value.
Floating interest rates on the swaps are reset on a monthly, quarterly, or semiannual
basis. Changes in fair value of the debt instruments classified as trading assets and
hedges of loans receivable recognized at fair value are generally offset by changes in fair
value of the related derivatives, both of which are recorded in interest and other, net. |
Equity Market Risk
Our marketable investments include marketable equity securities and equity derivative instruments.
To the extent that our marketable equity securities have strategic value, we typically do not
attempt to reduce or eliminate our equity market exposure through hedging activities. We may enter
into transactions to reduce or eliminate the equity market risks for our investments in strategic
equity derivative instruments. For securities that we no longer consider strategic, we evaluate
legal, market, and economic factors in our decision on the timing of disposal and whether it is
possible and appropriate to hedge the equity market risk. Our equity market risk management program
includes equity derivatives without hedge accounting designation that utilize warrants, equity
options, or other equity derivatives. We recognize changes in the fair value of such derivatives in
gains (losses) on other equity investments, net. We also utilize total return swaps to offset
changes in liabilities related to the equity market risks of certain deferred compensation
arrangements. Gains and losses from changes in fair value of these total return swaps are generally
offset by the gains and losses on the related liabilities, which are both recorded in cost of sales
and operating expenses.
In the second quarter of 2010, we sold our ownership interest in Numonyx to Micron for
consideration consisting of shares of Micron. We also entered into equity option transactions that
economically hedged a portion of the ownership interest in Micron that we acquired. In the second
quarter of 2011, we sold our remaining ownership interest in Micron and the related equity options
matured.
Commodity Price Risk
We operate facilities that consume commodities, and have established forecasted transaction risk
management programs to protect against fluctuations in fair value and the volatility of future cash
flows caused by changes in commodity prices, such as those for natural gas. These programs reduce,
but do not always entirely eliminate, the impact of commodity price movements.
13
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
Our commodity price risk management program includes commodity derivatives with cash flow hedge
accounting designation that utilize commodity swap contracts to hedge future cash flow exposures to
the variability in commodity prices. These instruments generally mature within 12 months. For these
derivatives, we report the after-tax gain (loss) from the effective portion of the hedge as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassify it into earnings in the
same period or periods in which the hedged transaction affects earnings, and within the same line
item on the consolidated condensed statements of income as the impact of the hedged transaction.
Volume of Derivative Activity
Total gross notional amounts for outstanding derivatives (recorded at fair value) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
Dec. 25, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
(In Millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Currency forwards |
|
$ |
8,661 |
|
|
$ |
8,502 |
|
|
$ |
6,940 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
2,055 |
|
|
|
2,166 |
|
|
|
2,156 |
|
Currency interest rate swaps |
|
|
1,713 |
|
|
|
2,259 |
|
|
|
2,287 |
|
Embedded debt derivatives |
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
3,600 |
|
Total return swaps |
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
Equity options |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
Currency options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
Other |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
16,990 |
|
|
$ |
17,810 |
|
|
$ |
16,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gross notional amounts for currency forwards, currency interest rate swaps, and currency
options (presented by currency) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
Dec. 25, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
(In Millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Euro |
|
$ |
4,289 |
|
|
$ |
4,445 |
|
|
$ |
4,371 |
|
Japanese yen |
|
|
2,935 |
|
|
|
3,440 |
|
|
|
2,412 |
|
Israeli shekel |
|
|
1,459 |
|
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
|
712 |
|
Chinese yuan |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
Malaysian ringgit |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
British pound sterling |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
Other |
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10,374 |
|
|
$ |
10,855 |
|
|
$ |
9,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit-Risk-Related Contingent Features
An insignificant amount of our derivative instruments contain credit-risk-related contingent
features, such as provisions that require our debt to maintain an investment grade credit rating
from each of the major credit rating agencies. As of July 2, 2011 and December 25, 2010, we did not
have any derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a
significant net liability position.
14
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets
The fair values of our derivative instruments as of July 2, 2011 and December 25, 2010 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, 2011 |
|
|
Dec. 25, 2010 |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
Long-Term |
|
|
Accrued |
|
|
Long-Term |
|
|
Current |
|
|
Long-Term |
|
|
Accrued |
|
|
Long-Term |
|
(In Millions) |
|
Assets |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency forwards |
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as
hedging instruments |
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as
hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency forwards |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
Currency interest rate swaps |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Embedded debt derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
Total return swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
208 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
$ |
209 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
330 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
208 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
The before-tax effects of derivative instruments in cash flow hedging relationships for the three
and six months ended July 2, 2011 and June 26, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (Losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCI on Derivatives |
|
|
Gains (Losses) Reclassified from Accumulated |
|
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
OCI Into Income by Derivative Instrument Type (Effective Portion) |
|
(In Millions) |
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
Q2 2010 |
|
|
Location |
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
Q2 2010 |
|
Currency forwards |
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
(126 |
) |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing, general and administrative |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (Losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCI on Derivatives |
|
|
Gains (Losses) Reclassified from Accumulated |
|
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
OCI into Income by Derivative Instrument Type (Effective Portion) |
|
(In Millions) |
|
YTD 2011 |
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
|
Location |
|
YTD 2011 |
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
Currency forwards |
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
(178 |
) |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing, general and administrative |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
(175 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains and losses on derivative instruments in cash flow hedging relationships related to hedge
ineffectiveness and amounts excluded from effectiveness testing were insignificant during all
periods presented in the preceding tables. We estimate that we will reclassify approximately $165
million (before taxes) of net derivative gains included in other accumulated comprehensive income
(loss) into earnings within the next 12 months. For all periods presented, there was an
insignificant impact on results of operations from discontinued cash flow hedges as a result of
forecasted transactions that did not occur.
15
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
The effects of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated
condensed statements of income were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
Location of Gains (Losses) |
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
(In Millions) |
|
Recognized in Income on Derivatives |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Currency forwards |
|
Interest and other, net |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Interest and other, net |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
Currency interest rate swaps |
|
Interest and other, net |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
226 |
|
Total return swaps |
|
Various |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Equity options |
|
Gains (losses) on other equity investments, net |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
Other |
|
Gains (losses) on other equity investments, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
$ |
(175 |
) |
|
$ |
332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10: Other Long-Term Assets
Other long-term assets at the end of each period were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
Dec. 25, |
|
(In Millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Equity method investments |
|
$ |
1,738 |
|
|
$ |
1,791 |
|
Non-marketable cost method investments |
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
Non-current deferred tax assets |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
Loans receivable |
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
741 |
|
Other |
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other long-term assets |
|
$ |
4,484 |
|
|
$ |
4,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11: Equity Method Investments
IMFT/IMFS
Micron and Intel formed IM Flash Technologies, LLC (IMFT) in January 2006 and IM Flash Singapore,
LLP (IMFS) in February 2007. We established these joint ventures to manufacture NAND flash memory
products for Micron and Intel. As of July 2, 2011, we owned a 49% interest in IMFT and a 14%
interest in IMFS. The carrying value of our investment in IMFT/IMFS was $1.3 billion as of July 2,
2011 ($1.5 billion as of December 25, 2010) and is classified within other long-term assets. The
IMFS fabrication facility began initial production in the second quarter of 2011. IMFT and IMFS are
each governed by a Board of Managers, with Micron and Intel initially appointing an equal number of
managers to each of the boards. The number of managers appointed by each party adjusts depending on
the parties ownership interests. As a result of the reduction of our ownership interest in IMFS
during 2010 and 2011, Micron now appoints the majority of the managers on the IMFS board. These
ventures are expected to operate until 2016 but are subject to earlier termination under certain
terms and conditions.
These joint ventures are variable interest entities. All costs of the joint ventures will be passed
on to Micron and Intel through our purchase agreements. IMFT and IMFS are dependent upon Micron and
Intel for any additional cash requirements. Our known maximum exposure to loss approximated the
carrying value of our investment balance in IMFT/IMFS as of July 2, 2011. As of July 2, 2011,
except for the amount due to IMFT/IMFS for product purchases and services, we did not have any
additional liabilities recognized on our consolidated condensed balance sheet in connection with
our interests in these joint ventures. In addition to the potential loss of our existing
investment, our actual losses could be higher, as Intel and Micron are liable for other future
operating costs or obligations of IMFT/IMFS. In addition, future cash calls could increase our
investment balance and the related exposure to loss. Finally, as we are currently committed to
purchasing 49% of IMFTs and 43% of IMFSs production output and production-related services, we
may be required to purchase products at a cost in excess of realizable value. Our contractual
commitment to purchase product output and fund production-related services adjusts to changes in
our ownership percentage on a one-year lag.
16
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
Our portion of IMFT/IMFS costs, primarily related to product purchases and production-related
services, was approximately $250 million during the second quarter of 2011 and approximately $470
million during the first half of 2011 (approximately $190 million during the second quarter of 2010
and approximately $380 million during the first half of 2010). The amount due to IMFT/IMFS for
product purchases and services provided was approximately $110 million as of July 2, 2011
(approximately $105 million as of December 25, 2010). During the first half of 2011, $113 million
was returned to Intel by IMFT/IMFS, which is reflected as a return of equity method investment
within investing activities on the consolidated condensed statements of cash flows ($99 million
during the first half of 2010).
Under the accounting standards for consolidating variable interest entities, the consolidating
investor is the entity with the power to direct the activities of the venture that most
significantly impact the ventures economic performance and with the obligation to absorb losses or
the right to receive benefits from the venture that could potentially be significant to the
venture. We have determined that we do not have both of these characteristics and, therefore, we
account for our interests using the equity method of accounting.
Intel-GE Care Innovations, LLC
In the first quarter of 2011, Intel and General Electric Company (GE) formed an equally owned joint
venture, Intel-GE Care Innovations, LLC (Care Innovations), in the healthcare industry that focuses
on independent living and delivery of health-related services via telecommunications. The company
was formed by combining assets of GE Healthcares Home Health division and Intels Digital Health
Group. As a result of the formation of Care Innovations, we recognized a gain of $164 million in
the first quarter of 2011 that is recorded in interest and other, net. Our investment in Care
Innovations was $159 million as of July 2, 2011 and is classified in other long-term assets.
Care Innovations is dependent upon Intel and GE for any additional cash requirements and,
therefore, is a variable interest entity. Our known maximum exposure to loss approximated the
carrying value of our investment balance in Care Innovations as of July 2, 2011. In addition to the
potential loss of our existing investment, our actual losses could be higher, as we are liable to
contribute additional future funding up to approximately $65 million if Care Innovations were to
meet established milestones.
Intel and GE share the power to direct all of Care Innovations activities that most significantly
impact its economic performance. As a result, we account for our interests in Care Innovations
under the equity method of accounting.
Note 12: Gains (Losses) on Equity Method Investments, Net
Gains (losses) on equity method investments, net included:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
(In Millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Equity method losses, net |
|
$ |
(67 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
(129 |
) |
|
$ |
(44 |
) |
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) on equity method investments, net |
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
(108 |
) |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 13: Gains (Losses) on Other Equity Investments, Net
Gains (losses) on other equity investments, net included:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
(In Millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
$ |
(53 |
) |
Gains on sales, net |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) on other equity investments, net |
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
Note 14: Interest and Other, Net
The components of interest and other, net were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
(In Millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and other, net |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the first quarter of 2011, we recognized a gain upon formation of the Intel and GE joint
venture, Care Innovations, of $164 million, included within other, net, in the table above. See
Note 11: Equity Method Investments, for further information.
Note 15: Acquisitions
McAfee, Inc.
On February 28, 2011, we completed the acquisition of McAfee by acquiring all issued and
outstanding common shares in exchange for cash. The acquired company will continue to operate as
McAfee and offer products for endpoint security, system security, consumer security,
network security, and risk and compliance. In addition to managing the existing
McAfee business, the objective of the acquisition is to accelerate and enhance the combination of
hardware and software security solutions, improving the overall security of our platforms.
Total consideration to acquire McAfee was $6.7 billion (net of $943 million of cash and cash
equivalents acquired) and comprised the following:
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
6,652 |
|
Share-based awards assumed |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
The allocation of purchase consideration to assets and liabilities is not yet finalized. The
preliminary allocation of the purchase price was based upon a preliminary valuation and our
estimates and assumptions are subject to change within the measurement period (up to one year from
the acquisition date). The primary areas of the preliminary purchase price allocation that are not
yet finalized are the determination of the tax basis of certain assets and liabilities, the
determination of certain tax carry forwards, residual goodwill, and the allocation of goodwill to
our reporting units. Reporting units are equivalent to our operating segments. The preliminary fair
values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed by major class in the acquisition of McAfee
were recognized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
|
|
|
Marketable debt securities |
|
$ |
329 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
4,295 |
|
Identified intangible assets |
|
|
3,552 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
742 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
417 |
|
Deferred income |
|
|
(1,049 |
) |
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(1,191 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
The preliminary goodwill of $4.3 billion arising from the acquisition is primarily attributed to
the assembled workforce of McAfee and synergies to enable the combination of security and hardware
from a single company to protect online devices. Substantially all of the goodwill recognized is
not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. For the information on the assignment of
preliminary goodwill for the acquisition, see Note 17: Goodwill.
18
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
The identified intangible assets assumed in the acquisition of McAfee were recognized as follows
based upon their fair values as of February 28, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Useful Life |
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
|
(In Years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed technology |
|
$ |
1,221 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identified intangible assets subject to amortization |
|
$ |
2,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
In-process research and development |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade names |
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identified intangible assets |
|
$ |
3,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired developed technology represents the fair values of McAfee products that have reached
technological feasibility and are a part of McAfees product offerings. Customer relationships
represent the fair values of the underlying relationships and agreements with McAfees customers.
In-process research and development represents the fair values of incomplete McAfee research and
development projects that had not reached technological feasibility as of the date of acquisition.
In the future, the fair value of each project at the acquisition date will be either amortized or
impaired depending on whether the project is completed or abandoned. Trade names are indefinite
lived intangible assets and represent the fair values of brand and name recognition associated with
the marketing of McAfees products and services.
Other 2011 Acquisitions
During the first half of 2011, in addition to the McAfee acquisition, we completed seven
acquisitions qualifying as business combinations in exchange for total consideration of $1.7
billion, substantially all cash consideration. Total net cash consideration to acquire the Wireless
Solutions (WLS) business of Infineon Technologies AG, which operates as Intel Mobile Communications
(IMC), was $1.4 billion. The WLS business offers mobile phone components such as baseband
processors, radio frequency transceivers, and power management chips. In addition to managing the
existing WLS business, the objective of the acquisition is to provide solutions that enable a broad
range of computing applications to have wireless connectivity.
The allocation of purchase consideration to assets and liabilities acquired in the acquisition of
the WLS business is not yet finalized. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price was based
upon a preliminary valuation and our estimates and assumptions are subject to change within the
measurement period (up to one year from the acquisition date). The primary areas of the preliminary
purchase price allocation that are not yet finalized are the valuation of net tangible assets
acquired, residual goodwill, and the allocation of goodwill to our reporting units. The preliminary
fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed by major class in the acquisitions
completed during the first half of 2011, excluding McAfee, was allocated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
|
|
|
Fair value of net tangible assets acquired |
|
$ |
157 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
248 |
|
Identified intangible assets |
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the information on the assignment of preliminary goodwill for the acquisitions, see Note 17:
Goodwill.
The identified intangible assets assumed in the acquisitions completed during the first half of
2011, excluding McAfee, were recognized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Useful Life |
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
|
(In Years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed technology |
|
$ |
1,037 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identified intangible assets subject to amortization |
|
$ |
1,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
In-process research and development |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identified intangible assets |
|
$ |
1,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
Acquired developed technology represents the fair values of the acquirees products that have
reached technological feasibility and are a part of the acquirees product lines. Customer
relationships represent the fair values of the underlying relationships and agreements with the
acquirees customers. In-process research and development represents the fair values of incomplete
research and development projects that had not reached technological feasibility as of the date of
acquisition.
Actual and Pro Forma Results of Acquirees
Net
revenue and net income attributable to acquisitions completed during
the first half of 2011
have been included in our consolidated condensed statements of income from their respective
acquisition dates to the period ended July 2, 2011. The acquisitions completed during the first
half of 2011 were not individually significant to our consolidated condensed results of operations,
however, they were significant in the aggregate. For the three and six months ended July 2, 2011,
the results of the businesses acquired in 2011 contributed approximately $1.0 billion and $1.5
billion, respectively, to our net revenue and reduced our net income by approximately $50 million
and $120 million, respectively; substantially all of these impacts were attributable to McAfee and
Intel Mobile Communications and include the impacts of the amortization of acquired identified
intangible assets.
McAfee is a non-reportable operating segment and is aggregated with similar non-reportable
operating segments within the software and services operating segments category for segment
reporting purposes. Intel Mobile Communications is a non-reportable operating segment and is
aggregated with similar non-reportable operating segments within the other Intel architecture
operating segments category for segment reporting purposes. For further information, see Note 27:
Operating Segment Information.
The unaudited pro forma financial results for the three and six months ended July 2, 2011 and June
26, 2010 combine the historical results of Intel for the three and six months ended July 2, 2011
and June 26, 2010, respectively, along with the historical results of the businesses acquired
during the first half of 2011 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010,
respectively (due to differences in reporting periods). The results include the effects of pro
forma adjustments as if businesses acquired in the first half of 2011 were acquired on December 27,
2009. The three and six months ended June 26, 2010 pro forma results include nonrecurring
adjustments of $89 million and $202 million, respectively, which reduce net income due to the revaluation of McAfees historic
deferred revenue to fair value.
The pro forma financial results presented below do not include any anticipated synergies or other
expected benefits of the acquisitions. This is presented for informational purposes only and is not
indicative of future operations or results that would have been achieved had the acquisitions been
completed as of December 27, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
(In Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
13,100 |
|
|
$ |
11,573 |
|
|
$ |
26,527 |
|
|
$ |
22,587 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,014 |
|
|
$ |
2,778 |
|
|
$ |
6,198 |
|
|
$ |
5,082 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
Note 16: Divestitures
In the first quarter of 2011, we completed the divestiture of our Digital Health Group by entering
into an agreement with GE to form an equally owned joint venture to create a new healthcare company
focused on independent living and delivery of health-related services via telecommunications. The
new company, Care Innovations, was formed by combining assets of GE Healthcares Home Health
division and Intels Digital Health Group. During the first quarter of 2011, as a result of the
formation of Care Innovations, we recognized a gain of $164 million, within interest and other,
net. For further information, see Note 11: Equity Method Investments.
20
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
Note 17: Goodwill
Goodwill activity for the first half of 2011 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Intel |
|
|
Software and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Architecture |
|
|
Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PC Client |
|
|
Data Center |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
Group |
|
|
Group |
|
|
Segments |
|
|
Segments |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Total |
|
December 25, 2010 |
|
$ |
2,234 |
|
|
$ |
1,459 |
|
|
$ |
582 |
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,531 |
|
Additions due to McAfee acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,295 |
|
|
|
4,295 |
|
Additions due to other acquisitions |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
Transfers |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, 2011 |
|
$ |
2,153 |
|
|
$ |
1,459 |
|
|
$ |
688 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
4,565 |
|
|
$ |
9,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2011, we formed the Netbook and Tablet Group, which includes
microprocessors and related chipsets designed for the netbook and tablet market segments. Due to
the formation of this new operating segment, goodwill was transferred from our PC Client Group to
our Netbook and Tablet Group as shown in the preceding table. Our Netbook and Tablet Group is
included in the other Intel architecture operating segments category in the preceding table.
During the first quarter of 2011, we completed the acquisition of McAfee. The goodwill recognized
from this acquisition is unallocated to date. We will use information from our annual planning
process, which will be completed later this year, to measure the synergistic value that the McAfee
acquisition creates for operating segments other than McAfee. In addition to the McAfee
acquisition, we completed seven other acquisitions during the first half of 2011. The substantial
majority of the goodwill recognized from these seven other acquisitions is unallocated to date as
we continue to measure the synergistic value that the acquisitions create for our individual
operating segments. The remaining goodwill recognized from these seven other acquisitions was
allocated to Intel Mobile Communications, the Software and Services Group, and our PC Client Group.
Intel Mobile Communications is included in the other Intel architecture operating segments category
in the preceding table, while our Software and Services Group is included in the software and
services operating segments category. For further information about our acquisitions during the
first half of 2011, see Note 15: Acquisitions.
No goodwill was impaired during the first half of 2011 and 2010, and the accumulated impairment
losses as of July 2, 2011 were $713 million: $341 million associated with our PC Client Group, $279
million associated with our Data Center Group, and $93 million associated with other Intel
architecture operating segments. The accumulated impairment losses as of December 25, 2010 were
$713 million: $355 million associated with our PC Client Group, $279 million associated with our
Data Center Group, and $79 million associated with other Intel architecture operating segments.
21
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
Note 18: Identified Intangible Assets
Identified intangible assets consisted of the following as of July 2, 2011 and December 25, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
Gross Assets |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Acquisition-related developed technology |
|
$ |
2,534 |
|
|
$ |
(307 |
) |
|
$ |
2,227 |
|
Acquisition-related customer relationships |
|
|
1,710 |
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
1,593 |
|
Acquisition-related trade names |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
50 |
|
Licensed technology |
|
|
2,331 |
|
|
|
(620 |
) |
|
|
1,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identified intangible assets subject to amortization |
|
$ |
6,640 |
|
|
$ |
(1,059 |
) |
|
$ |
5,581 |
|
Acquisition-related trade names |
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
828 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identified intangible assets not subject to amortization |
|
$ |
1,119 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identified intangible assets |
|
$ |
7,759 |
|
|
$ |
(1,059 |
) |
|
$ |
6,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 25, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
Gross Assets |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Acquisition-related developed technology |
|
$ |
235 |
|
|
$ |
(97 |
) |
|
$ |
138 |
|
Acquisition-related customer relationships |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
142 |
|
Acquisition-related trade names |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
Licensed technology |
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identified intangible assets subject to amortization |
|
$ |
1,637 |
|
|
$ |
(882 |
) |
|
$ |
755 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identified intangible assets |
|
$ |
1,742 |
|
|
$ |
(882 |
) |
|
$ |
860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of our acquisition of McAfee during the first quarter of 2011, we recorded $3.6 billion
of identified intangible assets. In addition, as a result of our seven other acquisitions during
the first half of 2011, we recorded $1.3 billion of identified intangible assets, of which
substantially all was from the acquisition of the WLS business of Infineon. For further information
about identified intangible assets recorded as a result of acquisitions during the first half of
2011, see Note 15: Acquisitions.
In January 2011, we entered into a long-term patent cross-license agreement with NVIDIA. Under the
agreement, we received a license to all of NVIDIAs patents while NVIDIA products are licensed to
our patents, subject to exclusions for x86 products, certain chipsets, and certain flash memory
technology products. The agreement also included settlement of the existing litigation between the
companies as well as broad mutual general releases. We agreed to make payments totaling $1.5
billion to NVIDIA over six years ($300 million in each of January 2011, 2012, and 2013; and $200
million in each of January 2014, 2015, and 2016), which resulted in a liability totaling
approximately $1.4 billion, on a discounted basis. In the fourth quarter of 2010, we recognized an
expense of $100 million related to the litigation settlement. In the first quarter of 2011, we
recognized the remaining amount of $1.3 billion as licensed technology which will be amortized into
cost of sales over its estimated useful life of 17 years. As of July 2, 2011, the remaining
liability of $1.1 billion is classified within other accrued liabilities and other long-term
liabilities, based on the expected timing of the underlying payments.
For identified intangible assets that are subject to amortization, we recorded amortization expense
on the consolidated condensed statements of income as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
(In Millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Acquisition-related developed technology |
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
Licensed technology |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
Acquisition-related customer relationships |
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Acquisition-related trade names |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles |
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
22
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
Based on the identified intangible assets that are subject to amortization as of July 2, 2011, we
expect future amortization expense to be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
of 2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Acquisition-related developed technology |
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
$ |
522 |
|
|
$ |
506 |
|
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
$ |
208 |
|
Licensed technology |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
361 |
|
|
$ |
693 |
|
|
$ |
660 |
|
|
$ |
630 |
|
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
Acquisition-related customer relationships |
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
284 |
|
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
Acquisition-related trade names |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles |
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
$ |
274 |
|
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
259 |
|
Note 19: Deferred Income
Deferred income at the end of each period was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
Dec. 25, |
|
(In Millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Deferred income on shipments of components to distributors |
|
$ |
759 |
|
|
$ |
622 |
|
Deferred income from software and services operating segments |
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income |
|
$ |
1,824 |
|
|
$ |
747 |
|
Non-current deferred income from software and services operating segments |
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income |
|
$ |
2,185 |
|
|
$ |
768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We classify non-current deferred income from the software and services operating segments in other
long-term liabilities.
Note 20: Chipset Design Issue
In January 2011, as part of our ongoing quality assurance procedures, we identified a design issue
with the Intel® 6 Series Express Chipset family (formerly code-named Cougar Point). The
issue affected chipsets sold in the fourth quarter of 2010 and January 2011. We subsequently
implemented a silicon fix, and began shipping the updated version of the affected chipset in
February 2011. We estimate that the total cost to repair and replace affected materials and
systems, located with customers and in the market, will be $733 million. We recorded a charge of
$311 million in the fourth quarter of 2010, which comprised $67 million in product costs for the
affected chipsets and $244 million to establish a product accrual for this issue. We recognized a
charge of $343 million in the first quarter of 2011, primarily related to an additional product
accrual for the estimated costs to repair and replace affected materials and systems associated
with products sold subsequent to December 25, 2010. In the second quarter of 2011, we recognized an
additional $79 million charge as we finalized agreements with customers for reimbursement to repair
and replace affected materials and systems. Therefore, we do not expect to have any significant
future adjustments to our estimate. The charges incurred in the first half of 2011 are reflected in
the results of the PC Client Group operating segment. As of July 2, 2011, the remaining product
accrual for the chipset design issue was $346 million and is classified within other accrued
liabilities.
Note 21: Borrowings
In 2005, we issued $1.6 billion of junior subordinated convertible debentures (the 2005 debentures)
due in 2035. The conversion rate for the 2005 debentures adjusts for certain events outlined in the
indenture governing the debentures, such as quarterly dividend distributions in excess of $0.10 per
share. As of July 2, 2011, the conversion rate was 32.94 shares of common stock per $1,000
principal amount of debentures, representing an effective conversion price of approximately $30.36
per share of common stock. As of December 25, 2010, the conversion rate was 32.52 shares of common
stock per $1,000 principal amount of debentures, representing an effective conversion price of
approximately $30.75 per share of common stock.
23
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
Note 22: Employee Equity Incentive Plans
Our equity incentive plans are broad-based, long-term programs intended to attract and retain
talented employees and align stockholder and employee interests.
In connection with our completed acquisition of McAfee, we assumed their equity incentive plans and
issued replacement awards in the first quarter of 2011. The stock options and restricted stock
units issued generally retain the terms and conditions of the respective plans under which they
were originally granted. We will not grant additional shares under these plans.
In May 2011, stockholders approved an extension of the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (2006 Plan).
Stockholders approved 168 million additional shares for issuance, increasing the total shares of
common stock available for issuance as equity awards to employees and non-employee directors to 596
million shares. The approval also extended the expiration date of the 2006 Plan to June 2014. The
maximum shares to be awarded as non-vested shares (restricted stock) or non-vested share units
(restricted stock units) was increased to 394 million shares. As of July 2, 2011, 309 million
shares remained available for future grant under the 2006 Plan.
The 2006 Stock Purchase Plan allows eligible employees to purchase shares of our common stock at
85% of the value of our common stock on specific dates. Rights to purchase shares are granted
during the first and third quarters of each year. In May 2011, stockholders approved an extension
of the 2006 Stock Purchase Plan. Stockholders approved 133 million additional shares for issuance,
increasing the total shares of common stock available for issuance to 373 million shares. The
approval also extended the expiration date of the 2006 Stock Purchase Plan to August 2016. As of
July 2, 2011, 263 million shares were available for issuance under the 2006 Stock Purchase Plan.
Share-Based Compensation
We recognized $262 million of share-based compensation in the second quarter of 2011 and $562
million for the first half of 2011 ($232 million in the second quarter of 2010 and $480 million for
the first half of 2010).
We estimate the fair value of restricted stock unit awards with time-based vesting using the value
of our common stock on the date of grant, reduced by the present value of dividends expected to be
paid on our common stock prior to vesting. We estimate the fair value of market-based restricted
stock units using a Monte Carlo simulation model on the date of grant. We based the weighted
average estimated values of restricted stock unit grants, as well as the weighted average
assumptions that we used in calculating the fair value, on estimates at the date of grant, as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Estimated values |
|
$ |
19.55 |
|
|
$ |
22.56 |
|
|
$ |
19.76 |
|
|
$ |
22.71 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
Volatility |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of options granted under
our equity incentive plans and rights to acquire stock granted under our stock purchase plan. We
based the weighted average estimated values of employee stock option grants and rights granted
under the stock purchase plan, as well as the weighted average assumptions used in calculating
these values, on estimates at the date of grant, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options |
|
|
Stock Purchase Plan |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Estimated values |
|
$ |
3.89 |
|
|
$ |
4.87 |
|
|
$ |
3.89 |
|
|
$ |
4.83 |
|
|
$ |
4.41 |
|
|
$ |
4.57 |
|
Expected life (in years) |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Volatility |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
Under the stock purchase plan, rights to purchase shares are only granted during the first and
third quarters of each year.
24
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
Restricted Stock Unit Awards
Activity with respect to outstanding restricted stock units (RSUs) for the first half of 2011 was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
(In Millions, Except Per RSU Amounts) |
|
RSUs |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
December 25, 2010 |
|
|
99.8 |
|
|
$ |
18.56 |
|
Granted |
|
|
40.7 |
|
|
$ |
19.76 |
|
Assumed in acquisition |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
20.80 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(33.2 |
) |
|
$ |
18.41 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
$ |
19.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, 2011 |
|
|
110.3 |
|
|
$ |
19.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate fair value of awards that vested during the first half of 2011 was $653 million,
which represents the market value of Intel common stock on the date that the restricted stock units
vested. The grant date fair value of awards that vested during the first half of 2011 was $611
million. The number of restricted stock units vested includes shares that we withheld on behalf of
employees to satisfy the minimum statutory tax withholding requirements. As of July 2, 2011, 4
million of the outstanding restricted stock units were market-based restricted stock units.
Stock Option Awards
Activity with respect to outstanding stock options for the first half of 2011 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
(In Millions, Except Per Option Amounts) |
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
December 25, 2010 |
|
|
386.4 |
|
|
$ |
20.45 |
|
Granted |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
$ |
21.27 |
|
Assumed in acquisition |
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
$ |
15.95 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(22.0 |
) |
|
$ |
18.59 |
|
Cancelled and forfeited |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
$ |
20.03 |
|
Expired |
|
|
(16.6 |
) |
|
$ |
25.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, 2011 |
|
|
366.7 |
|
|
$ |
20.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable as of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 25, 2010 |
|
|
263.0 |
|
|
$ |
21.03 |
|
July 2, 2011 |
|
|
248.7 |
|
|
$ |
20.69 |
|
During the first half of 2011, the aggregate intrinsic value of stock option exercises was $89
million, which represents the difference between the exercise price and the value of Intel common
stock at the time of exercise.
Stock Purchase Plan
Employees purchased 10.3 million shares in the first half of 2011 (9.8 million shares in the first
half of 2010) for $181 million ($161 million in the first half of 2010) under the 2006 Stock
Purchase Plan.
Note 23: Common Stock Repurchases
Common Stock Repurchase Program
We have an ongoing authorization, since October 2005, as amended, from our Board of Directors to
repurchase up to $35 billion in shares of our common stock in open market or negotiated
transactions. As of July 2, 2011, $8.2 billion remained available for repurchase under the existing
repurchase authorization limit. During the second quarter of 2011, we repurchased 93.3 million
shares of common stock at a cost of $2.0 billion. During the first half of 2011, we repurchased
282.4 million shares of common stock at a cost of $6.0 billion. We did not make any common stock
repurchases under our authorized plan during the first half of 2010. We have repurchased 3.7
billion shares at a cost of $76 billion since the program began in 1990. Our repurchases in the
first half of 2011 were executed in privately negotiated transactions.
25
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
Restricted Stock Unit Withholdings
We issue restricted stock units as part of our equity incentive plans. For the majority of
restricted stock units granted, the number of shares issued on the date the restricted stock units
vest is net of the minimum statutory withholding requirements that we pay in cash to the
appropriate taxing authorities on behalf of our employees. During the first half of 2011, we
withheld 9.2 million shares (9.2 million shares during the first half of 2010) to satisfy $180
million ($219 million during the first half of 2010) of employees tax obligations. Although shares
withheld are not issued, they are treated as common stock repurchases in our financial statements,
as they reduce the number of shares that would have been issued upon vesting.
Note 24: Earnings Per Share
We computed our basic and diluted earnings per common share as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
(In Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
2,954 |
|
|
$ |
2,887 |
|
|
$ |
6,114 |
|
|
$ |
5,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
|
|
5,294 |
|
|
|
5,563 |
|
|
|
5,376 |
|
|
|
5,546 |
|
Dilutive effect of employee equity incentive plans |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
Dilutive effect of convertible debt |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
5,441 |
|
|
|
5,711 |
|
|
|
5,527 |
|
|
|
5,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We computed our basic earnings per common share using net income available to common stockholders
and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. We computed diluted
earnings per common share using net income available to common stockholders and the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding plus potentially dilutive common shares outstanding
during the period. Net income available to participating securities was insignificant for all
periods presented.
Potentially dilutive common shares from employee incentive plans are determined by applying the
treasury stock method to the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options, the assumed vesting of
outstanding restricted stock units, and the assumed issuance of common stock under the stock
purchase plan. Potentially dilutive common shares are determined by applying the if-converted
method for our 2005 debentures. However, as our 2009 debentures require settlement of the principal
amount of the debt in cash upon conversion, with the conversion premium paid in cash or stock at
our option, potentially dilutive common shares are determined by applying the treasury stock
method.
For the second quarter of 2011, we excluded 94 million outstanding weighted average stock options
(110 million for the first half of 2011) from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share
because the exercise prices of these stock options were greater than or equal to the average market
value of the common shares (118 million for the second quarter of 2010 and 152 million for the
first half of 2010). These options could be included in the calculation in the future if the
average market value of the common shares increases and is greater than the exercise price of these
options. We also excluded our 2009 debentures from the calculation of diluted earnings per common
share because the conversion option of the debentures was anti-dilutive. In the future, we could
have potentially dilutive shares if the average market price is above the conversion price.
26
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
Note 25: Comprehensive Income
The components of total comprehensive income were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
(In Millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,954 |
|
|
$ |
2,887 |
|
|
$ |
6,114 |
|
|
$ |
5,329 |
|
Change in net unrealized holding gain (loss) on
available-for-sale investments |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
Change in deferred tax asset valuation allowance |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
Change in net unrealized holding gain (loss) on derivatives |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
Change in net prior service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
Change in actuarial loss |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Change in net foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
2,939 |
|
|
$ |
2,704 |
|
|
$ |
6,247 |
|
|
$ |
5,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, at the end of each period
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
Dec. 25, |
|
(In Millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Accumulated net unrealized holding gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments |
|
$ |
360 |
|
|
$ |
401 |
|
Accumulated net change in deferred tax asset valuation allowance |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
Accumulated net unrealized holding gain (loss) on derivatives |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
Accumulated net prior service cost |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Accumulated net actuarial loss |
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
(362 |
) |
Accumulated net foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
466 |
|
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 26: Contingencies
Legal Proceedings
We are currently a party to various legal proceedings, including those noted in this section. While
management presently believes that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings, individually and in
the aggregate, will not materially harm the companys financial position, cash flows, or overall
trends in results of operations, legal proceedings and related government investigations are
subject to inherent uncertainties, and unfavorable rulings or other events could occur. Unfavorable
resolutions could include substantial monetary damages, and in matters for which injunctive relief or
other conduct remedies are sought, an injunction or other order prohibiting us from selling one or
more products at all or in particular ways, precluding particular business practices, or requiring
other remedies such as compulsory licensing of intellectual property. Were unfavorable final
outcomes to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on our business,
results of operations, financial position, and overall trends. It is also possible that we could
conclude it is in the best interests of our stockholders, employees, and customers to settle one or
more such matters, and any such settlement could include substantial payments; however, we have not
reached this conclusion with respect to any particular matter at this time.
A number of proceedings generally have challenged and continue to challenge certain of our
competitive practices. The allegations in these proceedings vary and are described in more detail
in the following paragraphs, but in general contend that we improperly condition price rebates and
other discounts on our microprocessors on exclusive or near-exclusive dealing by some of our
customers; claim that our software compiler business unfairly prefers Intel microprocessors over
competing microprocessors and that, through the use of our compiler and other means, we have caused
inaccurate and misleading benchmark results concerning our microprocessors to be disseminated;
allege that we unfairly controlled the content and timing of release of various standard computer
interfaces developed by Intel in cooperation with other industry participants; and accuse us of
engaging in various acts of improper competitive activity in competing against what is referred to
as general-purpose graphics processing units, including certain licensing practices and our actions
in connection with developing and disclosing potentially competitive technology.
27
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
We believe that we compete lawfully and that our marketing, business, intellectual property, and
other challenged practices benefit our customers and our stockholders, and we will continue to
conduct a vigorous defense in these proceedings. While we have settled some of these matters, the
distractions caused by challenges to these practices from the remaining matters are undesirable,
and the legal and other costs associated with defending and resolving our position have been and
continue to be significant. We assume that these challenges could continue for a number of years
and may require the investment of substantial additional management time and substantial financial
resources to explain and defend our position.
Government Competition Matters and Related Consumer Class Actions
In 2001, the European Commission (EC) commenced an investigation regarding claims by Advanced Micro
Devices, Inc. (AMD) that we used unfair business practices to persuade clients to buy our
microprocessors. Since that time, we have received numerous requests for information and documents
from the EC, and we have responded to each of those requests. The EC issued a Statement of
Objections in July 2007 and held a hearing on that Statement in March 2008. The EC issued a
Supplemental Statement of Objections in July 2008.
In May 2009, the EC issued a decision finding that we had violated Article 82 of the EC Treaty and
Article 54 of the European Economic Area Agreement. In general, the EC found that we violated
Article 82 (later renumbered as Article 102 by a new treaty) by offering alleged conditional
rebates and payments that required our customers to purchase all or most of their x86
microprocessors from us. The EC also found that we violated Article 82 by making alleged payments
to prevent sales of specific rival products. The EC imposed a fine in the amount of 1.06 billion
($1.447 billion as of May 2009), which we subsequently paid during the third quarter of 2009, and
also ordered us to immediately bring to an end the infringement referred to in the EC decision.
In the second quarter of 2009, we recorded the related charge within marketing, general and
administrative. We strongly disagree with the ECs decision, and we appealed the decision to the
Court of First Instance (which has been renamed the General Court) in July 2009. The EC filed an
answer to our reply brief in November 2010. The courts decision, after oral argument, is expected
in late 2012 or early 2013.
The EC decision exceeds 500 pages and does not contain specific direction on whether or how we
should modify our business practices. Instead, the decision states that we should cease and
desist from further conduct that, in the ECs opinion, would violate applicable law. We have taken
steps, which are subject to the ECs ongoing review, to comply with that decision pending appeal.
We opened discussions with the EC to better understand the decision and to explain changes to our
business practices. Based on our current understanding and expectations, we do not believe that any
such changes will be material to our financial position, results, or cash flows.
In June 2005, we received an inquiry from the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) requesting
documents from our Korean subsidiary related to marketing and rebate programs that we entered into
with Korean PC manufacturers. In February 2006, the KFTC initiated an inspection of documents at
our offices in Korea. In September 2007, the KFTC served on us an Examination Report alleging that
sales to two customers during parts of 20022005 violated Koreas Monopoly Regulation and Fair
Trade Act. In December 2007, we submitted our written response to the KFTC. In February 2008, the
KFTCs examiner submitted a written reply to our response. In March 2008, we submitted a further
response. In April 2008, we participated in a pre-hearing conference before the KFTC, and we
participated in formal hearings in May and June 2008. In June 2008, the KFTC announced its intent
to fine us approximately $25 million for providing discounts to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
TriGem Computer Inc. In November 2008, the KFTC issued a final written decision concluding that our
discounts had violated Korean antitrust law and imposing a fine on us of approximately $20 million,
which we paid in January 2009. In December 2008, we appealed this decision by filing a lawsuit in
the Seoul High Court seeking to overturn the KFTCs decision. We expect a decision from the court
in 2011.
In November 2009, the State of New York filed a lawsuit against us in the U.S. District Court for
the District of Delaware. The lawsuit alleges that we violated federal antitrust laws; the New York
Donnelly Act, which prohibits contracts or agreements to monopolize; and the New York Executive
Law, which proscribes underlying violations of federal and state antitrust laws. The lawsuit
alleges that we engaged in a systematic worldwide campaign of illegal, exclusionary conduct to
maintain monopoly power and prices in the market for x86 microprocessors through the use of various
alleged actions, including exclusive or near-exclusive agreements from large computer makers in
exchange for loyalty payments and bribes, and other alleged threats and retaliation. The
plaintiff claims that our alleged actions harmed consumers, competition, and innovation. The
lawsuit seeks a declaration that our alleged actions have violated the federal and New York
antitrust laws and the New York Executive Law; an injunction to prevent further alleged unlawful
acts; unspecified damages in an amount to be proven at trial, trebled as provided for by law,
restitution, and disgorgement; $1 million for each violation of the Donnelly Act proven by the
plaintiff, and attorneys fees and costs. We disagree with the
State of New Yorks allegations and claims and we intend to
conduct a vigorous defense of the lawsuit. We filed our answer in
January 2010, and the court has scheduled trial to begin in this
matter in February 2012.
28
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
In
December 2010, the State of New York requested the courts permission to amend its
complaint to expand the scope of parties covered by its Donnelly
Act and Executive Law claims. We opposed that request, and in May 2011, the court denied the
State of New York permission to amend its complaint. In May 2011, we filed three motions,
the first seeking partial summary judgment on the ground that the statute of limitations is four years on
the plaintiffs federal antitrust claim and three years on its Donnelly Act and Executive Law
claims, the second seeking dismissal of all claims brought on behalf of non-State of New York
public entities on the ground that the State of New York did not obtain proper consent to
represent them, and the third seeking judgment on the pleadings on the ground that the State
of New York cannot recover damages on behalf of New York consumers for certain claims. We
anticipate filing additional motions that could impact some or all of the State of New Yorks
claims. Because fact and expert discovery are continuing and resolution of the motions may
materially impact the scope and nature of plaintiffs claims, we are unable to make a
reasonable estimate of the potential loss or range of losses, if any, arising from this
litigation.
At least 82 separate class actions have been filed in the U.S. District Courts for the Northern
District of California, Southern District of California, District of Idaho, District of Nebraska,
District of New Mexico, District of Maine, and District of Delaware, as well as in various
California, Kansas, and Tennessee state courts. These actions generally repeat the allegations made
in a now-settled lawsuit filed against Intel by AMD in June 2005 in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Delaware (AMD litigation). Like the AMD litigation, these class-action suits allege that
Intel engaged in various actions in violation of the Sherman Act and other laws by, among other
things, providing discounts and rebates to our manufacturer and distributor customers conditioned
on exclusive or near exclusive dealings that allegedly unfairly interfered with AMDs ability to
sell its microprocessors, interfering with certain AMD product launches, and interfering with AMDs
participation in certain industry standards-setting groups. The class actions allege various
consumer injuries, including that consumers in various states have been injured by paying higher
prices for computers containing our microprocessors. We dispute the
class-action claims and intend to defend the lawsuits vigorously.
All of the federal class actions and the
Kansas and Tennessee state court class actions have been transferred by the Multidistrict
Litigation Panel to the U.S. District Court in Delaware for all pretrial proceedings and
discovery (MDL proceedings). The Delaware district court has appointed a Special Master to
address issues in the MDL proceedings, as assigned by the court. In January 2010, the
plaintiffs in the Delaware action filed a motion for sanctions for our alleged failure to
preserve evidence. This motion largely copies a motion previously filed by AMD in the AMD
litigation, which has settled. The plaintiffs in the MDL proceedings also moved for certification
of a class of members who purchased certain personal computers containing products sold by Intel.
In July 2010, the Special Master issued a Report and Recommendation (Class Report) denying
the motion to certify a class. The MDL plaintiffs filed objections to the Special Masters
Class Report, and a hearing on these objections was held in March 2011. The Delaware district
court has not yet ruled on those objections. All California class actions have been consolidated
in the Superior Court of California in Santa Clara County. The plaintiffs in the California
actions have moved for class certification, which we are in the process of opposing. At our
request, the court in the California actions has agreed to delay ruling on this motion until
after the Delaware district court rules on the similar motion in the MDL proceedings. Based on
the procedural posture and the nature of the cases, including, but not limited to, the fact that
the Special Masters Class Report is on review in the Delaware district court, we are unable to
make a reasonable estimate of the potential loss or range of losses, if any, arising from these
matters.
Lehman Matter
In November 2009, representatives of the Lehman Brothers OTC Derivatives Inc. (LOTC) bankruptcy
estate advised us informally that the estate was considering a claim against us arising from a 2008
contract between Intel and LOTC. Under the terms of the 2008 contract, Intel prepaid $1.0 billion
to LOTC, in exchange for which LOTC was required to purchase and deliver to Intel the number of
shares of Intel common stock that could be purchased for $1.0 billion at the discounted
volume-weighted average price specified in the contract for the period September 2, 2008 to
September 26, 2008. LOTCs performance under the contract was secured by $1.0 billion of cash
collateral. Under the terms of the contract, LOTC was obligated to deliver approximately 50 million
shares of our common stock to us on September 29, 2008. LOTC failed to deliver any shares of our
common stock, and we exercised our right to setoff against the $1.0 billion collateral. LOTC has
not initiated any action against us to date, but in February 2010, LOTC served a subpoena on us in
connection with this transaction. In October 2010, LOTC demanded that Intel pay it at least $417
million. In September 2010, we entered into an agreement with LOTC that tolled any applicable
statutes of limitations for 90 days and precluded the parties from commencing any formal
proceedings to prosecute any claims against each other in any forum during that period. The tolling
agreement with LOTC was extended several times, but lapsed in June 2011. We continue to believe
that we acted appropriately under our agreement with LOTC, and we intend to defend any claim to the
contrary. No complaint has been filed and we are in the early stages of evaluating this dispute,
and accordingly are unable to make a reasonable estimate of the potential loss or range of losses,
if any, arising from this matter.
29
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
Frank T. Shum v. Intel Corporation, Jean-Marc Verdiell, and LightLogic, Inc.
We acquired LightLogic, Inc. in May 2001. Frank Shum subsequently sued us, LightLogic, and
LightLogics founder, Jean-Marc Verdiell, claiming that much of LightLogics intellectual property
is based on alleged inventions that Shum conceived while he and Verdiell were partners at Radiance
Design, Inc. Shum has alleged claims for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent concealment,
and breach of contract. Shum also seeks alleged correction of inventorship of seven patents
acquired by us as part of the LightLogic acquisition. In January 2005, the U.S. District Court for
the Northern District of California denied Shums inventorship claim, and thereafter granted our
motion for summary judgment on Shums remaining claims. In August 2007, the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit vacated the District Courts rulings and remanded the case for further
proceedings. In October 2008, the District Court granted our motion for summary judgment on Shums
claims for breach of fiduciary duty and fraudulent concealment, but denied our motion on Shums
remaining claims. A jury trial on Shums remaining claims took place in November and December 2008.
In pre-trial proceedings and at trial, Shum requested monetary damages against the defendants in
amounts ranging from $31 million to $931 million, and his final request to the jury was for as much
as $175 million. Following deliberations, the jury was unable to reach a verdict on most of the
claims. With respect to Shums claim that he is the proper inventor on certain LightLogic patents
now assigned to us, the jury agreed with Shum on some of those claims and was unable to reach a
verdict regarding the remaining claims. In April 2009, the court granted defendants motions for
judgment as a matter of law. Shum appealed that ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit, which heard oral arguments in August 2010 and affirmed the trial courts orders in favor
of Intel in December 2010. In January 2011, Shum petitioned the Federal Circuit for a re-hearing
and re-hearing en banc. In February 2011, the Federal Circuit denied Shums request. Shum
petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for review in May 2011, and we are preparing our response. We will
continue to defend the lawsuit vigorously.
Note 27: Operating Segment Information
Our operating segments in effect as of July 2, 2011 include:
|
|
|
PC Client Group |
|
|
|
|
Data Center Group |
|
|
|
|
Intel Mobile Communications |
|
|
|
|
Embedded and Communications Group |
|
|
|
|
Netbook and Tablet Group |
|
|
|
|
Digital Home Group |
|
|
|
Ultra-Mobility Group |
|
|
|
|
McAfee |
|
|
|
|
Wind River Software Group |
|
|
|
|
Software and Services Group |
|
|
|
|
Non-Volatile Memory Solutions Group |
In the first quarter of 2011, we formed the Netbook and Tablet Group, which includes
microprocessors and related chipsets designed for the netbook and tablet market segments, and we
divested the Digital Health Group (for further information see Note 16: Divestitures).
Prior-period amounts have been adjusted retrospectively to reflect these operating segment changes
as well as other minor reorganizations. Additionally, in the first quarter of 2011, we formed the
Intel Mobile Communications and McAfee operating segments as a result of acquisitions (for further
information see Note 15: Acquisitions).
The Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) is our President and Chief Executive Officer. The CODM
allocates resources to and assesses the performance of each operating segment using information
about its revenue and operating income (loss).
Our PC Client Group and our Data Center Group are reportable operating segments. We aggregate and
disclose the financial results of the following non-reportable operating segments within other
Intel architecture operating segments: Intel Mobile Communications, Embedded and Communications
Group, Netbook and Tablet Group, Digital Home Group, and Ultra-Mobility Group. We also aggregate
and disclose the financial results of the following non-reportable operating segments within
software and services operating segments: McAfee, Wind River Software Group, and Software and
Services Group. Each of these aggregated operating segments does not meet the quantitative
thresholds to qualify as reportable operating segments; however, we have elected to disclose the
aggregation of these non-reportable operating segments. Revenue for our reportable and aggregated
non-reportable operating segments is primarily related to the following product lines:
|
|
|
PC Client Group. Includes microprocessors and related chipsets and
motherboards designed for the notebook and desktop (including high-end enthusiast PCs)
market segments; and wireless connectivity products. |
|
|
|
|
Data Center Group. Includes microprocessors and related chipsets and
motherboards designed for the server, workstation, and storage computing market segments;
and wired network connectivity products. |
|
|
|
|
Other Intel architecture operating segments. Includes mobile phone components
such as baseband processors, radio frequency transceivers, and power management chips;
microprocessors and related chipsets designed for embedded applications; microprocessors
and related chipsets designed for the netbook and tablet market segments; products
designed for the consumer electronics market segment; and products designed for the
handheld market segment. |
|
|
|
|
Software and services operating segments. Includes software products for
endpoint security, system security, consumer security, network security, and risk and
compliance from our McAfee business; software optimized products for the embedded and
handheld market segments; and software products and services that promote
Intel® architecture as the platform of choice for software development. |
30
INTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
We have sales and marketing, manufacturing, finance, and administration groups. Expenses for these
groups are generally allocated to the operating segments, and the allocated expenses are included
in the operating results reported below.
The All other category includes revenue, expenses, and charges such as:
|
|
|
results of operations from our Non-Volatile Memory Solutions Group that
includes NAND flash memory products for use in a variety of devices; |
|
|
|
|
a portion of profit-dependent compensation and other expenses not allocated to
the operating segments; |
|
|
|
|
divested businesses for which discrete operating results are not reviewed by
our CODM; |
|
|
|
|
results of operations of seed businesses that support our initiatives; and |
|
|
|
|
acquisition-related costs, including amortization and any impairment of
acquisition-related intangibles and goodwill. |
The CODM does not evaluate operating segments using discrete asset information. Operating segments
do not record inter-segment revenue, and, accordingly, there is none to be reported. We do not
allocate gains and losses from equity investments, interest and other income, or taxes to operating
segments. Although the CODM uses operating income to evaluate the segments, operating costs
included in one segment may benefit other segments. The accounting policies for segment reporting
are the same as for Intel as a whole.
Segment information is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
(In Millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PC Client Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Microprocessor revenue |
|
$ |
6,533 |
|
|
$ |
5,902 |
|
|
$ |
13,356 |
|
|
$ |
11,594 |
|
Chipsets, motherboard, and other revenue |
|
|
1,788 |
|
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
3,586 |
|
|
|
3,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,321 |
|
|
|
7,501 |
|
|
|
16,942 |
|
|
|
14,876 |
|
Data Center Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Microprocessor revenue |
|
|
2,054 |
|
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
4,115 |
|
|
|
3,349 |
|
Chipsets, motherboard, and other revenue |
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,436 |
|
|
|
2,114 |
|
|
|
4,900 |
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
Other Intel architecture operating segments |
|
|
1,389 |
|
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
2,538 |
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
Software and services operating segments |
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
All other |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
13,032 |
|
|
$ |
10,765 |
|
|
$ |
25,879 |
|
|
$ |
21,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PC Client Group |
|
$ |
3,284 |
|
|
$ |
3,333 |
|
|
$ |
6,827 |
|
|
$ |
6,420 |
|
Data Center Group |
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
2,426 |
|
|
|
1,894 |
|
Other Intel architecture operating segments |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
102 |
|
Software and services operating segments |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
All other |
|
|
(506 |
) |
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
(1,025 |
) |
|
|
(895 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
3,935 |
|
|
$ |
3,981 |
|
|
$ |
8,093 |
|
|
$ |
7,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is
provided in addition to the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements and notes to
assist readers in understanding our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.
MD&A is organized as follows:
|
|
|
Overview. Discussion of our business and overall analysis of financial and
other highlights affecting the company in order to provide context for the remainder of
MD&A. |
|
|
|
|
Strategy. Our overall strategy. |
|
|
|
|
Critical Accounting Estimates. Accounting estimates that we believe are most
important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported
financial results and forecasts. |
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations. An analysis of our financial results comparing the three
and six months ended July 2, 2011 to the three and six months ended June 26, 2010. In the
first quarter of 2011, we formed the Netbook and Tablet Group (NTG), which includes
microprocessors and related chipsets designed for the netbook and tablet market segments.
NTG results were previously included in the results of the PC Client Group and are now
included in the other Intel architecture operating segments category. The analysis of our
operating segment results of operations reflects this reorganization and prior-period
amounts have been adjusted retrospectively. |
|
|
|
|
Business Outlook. Our expectations for selected financial items for the third
quarter of 2011 and the 2011 full year. |
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources. An analysis of changes in our balance sheets
and cash flows, and discussion of our financial condition and potential sources of
liquidity. |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. Discussion of the methodologies used in
the valuation of our financial instruments. |
The various sections of this MD&A contain a number of forward-looking statements. Words such as
expects, goals, plans, believes, continues, may, will, and variations of such words
and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. In addition, any
statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance, our anticipated growth
and trends in our businesses, and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are
forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on our current expectations and could be
affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this filing and particularly in
the Business Outlook section and in Risk Factors in Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q. Our
actual results may differ materially, and these forward-looking statements do not reflect the
potential impact of any divestitures, mergers, acquisitions, or other business combinations that
had not been completed as of August 8, 2011.
Overview
Our results of operations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
Q1 2011 |
|
|
Q2 2010 |
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
13,032 |
|
|
$ |
12,847 |
|
|
$ |
10,765 |
|
Gross margin |
|
$ |
7,902 |
|
|
$ |
7,885 |
|
|
$ |
7,235 |
|
Gross margin percentage |
|
|
60.6 |
% |
|
|
61.4 |
% |
|
|
67.2 |
% |
Operating income |
|
$ |
3,935 |
|
|
$ |
4,158 |
|
|
$ |
3,981 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,954 |
|
|
$ |
3,160 |
|
|
$ |
2,887 |
|
The second quarter of 2011 was another record quarter for revenue as the trends of strength in our
server business, increased demand from the enterprise market segment and emerging markets, offset
by weakness in the mature market consumer segment have continued throughout the first half of 2011.
In the second quarter of 2011 we achieved double digit percentage revenue growth in our Data Center
Group and PC Client Group compared to the second quarter of 2010. Average selling prices for
microprocessors in our PC Client Group have increased from last year in part from the continued
successful ramp of our 2nd generation Intel® CoreTM processor products
(formerly code-named Sandy Bridge). Our second quarter results also include a full quarter of
revenue for McAfee, Inc. and the Wireless Solutions (WLS) business of Infineon Technologies AG, which we acquired
during the first quarter of 2011. We continue to believe we are on track for another year of
revenue growth over 20 percent.
32
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Gross margin in the second quarter of 2011 was slightly down from the first quarter as start-up
costs for our 22nm process technology reached an expected peak and platform (microprocessor and
chipset) unit costs were higher on the ramp of additional 32nm factories. These negative impacts to
our gross margin were mostly offset by lower charges to repair and replace materials and systems
impacted by a design issue related to our Intel® 6 Series Express Chipset family. We
expect our gross margin percentage to increase in the third quarter on seasonally higher volume,
lower start-up costs for our 22nm process technology, lack of charges related to the chipset design
issue, and lower platform unit costs.
We increased our expectation for research and development and marketing and general and
administrative expenses in 2011 from $15.7 billion to $16.2 billion, primarily on expected
investments in areas that we believe will drive future revenue growth. These investments are
focused on redefining the PC category with new form factors, such as UltrabookTM system
designs; strengthening our server product offerings; strengthening our product offerings for
tablets and smartphones; as well as extending our process technology leadership. We also increased
our expectation for capital spending this year from our previous estimate of $10.2 billion to $10.5
billion, as we expect to put capabilities in place that will allow us to re-use capital in
succeeding process technologies.
The cash generation from our business remained strong with cash from operations of $4.0 billion in
the second quarter of 2011. From a financial condition perspective, we ended the second quarter of
2011 with an investment portfolio of $11.5 billion, consisting of cash and cash equivalents,
short-term investments, and marketable debt instruments included in trading assets. During the
second quarter of 2011, we purchased $2.5 billion in capital assets, repurchased $2.0 billion of
common stock through our common stock repurchase program, and returned $1.0 billion to stockholders
through dividends. In July, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.21 per common share
for the third quarter of 2011(a per share increase of 16% from the dividend paid in the second
quarter).
Strategy
Our goal is to be the preeminent computing solutions company that powers the worldwide digital
economy. We believe that the proliferation of the Internet and cloud computing have driven
fundamental changes in the computing industry. We are transforming from a company with a primary
focus on the design and manufacture of semiconductor chips for PCs and servers to a computing
company that delivers complete solutions in the form of hardware and software platforms and
supporting services. The number and variety of devices connected to the Internet is growing, and
computing is becoming an increasingly personal experience. End users value consistency across
devices that connect seamlessly and effortlessly to the Internet and to each other. We will help to
enable this experience by innovating around three pillars of computing: energy-efficient
performance, connectivity, and security.
|
|
|
Energy-Efficient Performance. We are focusing on improved energy-efficient
performance for computing and communications systems and devices. Improved energy-efficient
performance involves balancing higher performance with lower power consumption. |
|
|
|
|
Connectivity. We are positioning our business to take advantage of the growth
in devices that compute and connect to the Internet. In the first quarter of 2011, we
acquired the WLS business of Infineon. This acquisition enables us to offer
a portfolio of products that covers a broad range of wireless connectivity options by
combining the Intel® WiFi and Intel® WiMAX technologies with WLS 2G
and 3G technologies, and creates a combined path to accelerate industry adoption of 4G LTE. |
|
|
|
|
Security. Our goal is to enhance security features through a combination of
hardware and software solutions. This may include identity protection and fraud deterrence;
detection and prevention of malware; securing data and assets; as well as system recovery
and enhanced security patching. In the first quarter of 2011, we acquired McAfee. We
believe this acquisition accelerates and enhances our hardware and software security
solutions, improving the overall security of our platforms. |
To succeed in the changing computing environment, we have the following key objectives:
|
|
|
Strive to ensure that Intel technology remains the best choice for the PC as well as
cloud computing and the data center. Our UltrabookTM system designs will enable
a new user experience by accelerating a new class of mobile computers that use low power
processors. These computers will combine the performance and capabilities of todays
laptops and tablets in a thin and light form factor that is highly responsive, secure, and
seamlessly connects to the Internet and other enabled devices. |
|
|
|
|
Expand platforms into adjacent market segments to bring compelling new solutions to the
smartphone, the tablet, the TV, the car, and the embedded world. |
|
|
|
|
Enable devices that connect to the Internet and to each other to create a continuum of
personal computing. This continuum would give consumers a set of secure, consistent, and
personalized computing experiences. |
|
|
|
|
Positively impact the world through our actions and the application of our
energy-efficient technology. |
33
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
We will use our core assets to meet these objectives. Our core assets include our silicon and
process technology, our architecture and platforms, our global presence, our strong relationships
across the industry, and our brand recognition. We believe that applying these core assets to our
key focus areas provides us with the scale, capacity, and global reach to establish new
technologies and respond to customers needs quickly. Some of our core assets and key focus areas
are:
|
|
|
Silicon and Manufacturing Technology Leadership. We have long been a leader in silicon
process technology and manufacturing, and we aim to continue our lead through investment
and innovation in this critical area. We drive a regular two-year upgrade
cycleintroducing a new microarchitecture approximately every two years and ramping the
next generation of silicon process technology in the intervening years. We refer to this as
our tick-tock technology development cadence. As we continue to drive Moores Law over
the next several years, we believe that the value of this leadership will increase.
We have accelerated the Intel® AtomTM processor-based system-on-chip roadmap
for netbooks, smartphones, tablets, and other devices, from 32nm through 22nm to 14nm
within 3 successive years. We expect that this acceleration will result in a significant reduction in transistor leakage, lower active power, and an increase of transistor density to enable more powerful smartphones, tablets, and netbooks with more features and longer battery life.
Additionally, we aim to have the best process technology, and unlike most
semiconductor companies, we primarily manufacture our products in our own facilities. This
allows us to optimize performance, reduce our time to market, and scale new products more
rapidly. |
|
|
|
|
Architecture and Platforms. We are now developing a wide range of solutions for
devices that span the computing continuum, from PCs, Ultrabook systems, tablets, and
smartphones to smart TVs and in-vehicle infotainment systems and beyond. Users want
computing experiences that are consistent and devices that are interoperable. Users and
developers value consistency of architecture, which provides a common framework that allows
for reduced time to market, with the ability to leverage technologies across multiple form
factors. We believe that we can meet the needs of both users and developers by offering
Intel® architecture-based computing solutions across the computing continuum. We
continue to invest in improving Intel architecture so that we can deliver increased value
to our customers in existing market segments and also expand the capabilities of the
architecture to meet end-user and customer needs in adjacent market segments. Increasingly,
we are delivering our architecture in the form of platforms. Platforms include not only the
microprocessor, but other critical hardware and software ingredients that are necessary to
create computing solutions. We are expanding our platform capabilities with connectivity
solutions, new types of user interfaces, new features and capabilities, and complementary
software. |
|
|
|
|
Software. We enable and advance the computing ecosystem by providing
development tools and support to help software developers create software applications and
operating systems that take advantage of our platforms. We seek to expedite growth in
various market segments, such as the embedded and handheld market segments, through our
software offerings. Additionally, we have collaborated with other companies to develop
software platforms optimized for our Intel® AtomTM processors and
that support multiple hardware architectures as well as multiple operating systems. |
|
|
|
|
Customer Orientation. Our strategy focuses on developing our next generation of
products based on the needs and expectations of our customers. In turn, our products help
enable the design and development of new form factors and usage models for businesses and
consumers. We offer platforms that incorporate various components designed and configured
to work together to provide an optimized solution compared to components that are used
separately. Additionally, we promote industry standards that we believe will yield
innovation and improved technologies for users. |
|
|
|
|
Strategic Investments. We make investments in companies around the world that
we believe will generate financial returns, further our strategic objectives, and support
our key business initiatives. Our investments, including those made through our Intel
Capital program, generally focus on investing in companies and initiatives to stimulate
growth in the digital economy, create new business opportunities for Intel, and expand
global markets for our products. |
|
|
|
|
Stewardship. We are committed to developing energy-efficient technology
solutions that can be used to address major global problems while reducing our
environmental impact. We are also committed to helping transform education globally through
our technology, program, and policy leadership, as well as funding through the Intel
Foundation. In addition, we strive to cultivate a work environment where engaged, energized
employees can thrive in their jobs and in their communities. |
Our continued investment in developing our assets and execution on key focus areas will strengthen
our competitive position as we enter and expand into new market segments. We believe that these new
market segments will result in demand that is incremental to that of microprocessors designed for
notebook and desktop computers. We also believe that increased Internet traffic and use of cloud
computing create a need for greater server infrastructure, including server products optimized for
energy-efficient performance and virtualization.
34
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Critical Accounting Estimates
The methods, estimates, and judgments that we use in applying our accounting policies have a
significant impact on the results that we report in our consolidated condensed financial
statements. Some of our accounting policies require us to make difficult and subjective judgments,
often as a result of the need to make estimates regarding matters that are inherently uncertain.
Our most critical accounting estimates include:
|
|
|
the valuation of non-marketable equity investments and the determination of
other-than-temporary impairments, which impact gains (losses) on equity method investments,
net, or gains (losses) on other equity investments, net when we record impairments; |
|
|
|
|
the assessment of recoverability of long-lived assets (property, plant and
equipment; goodwill; and identified intangibles), which impacts gross margin or operating
expenses when we record asset impairments or accelerate their depreciation or amortization; |
|
|
|
|
the recognition and measurement of current and deferred income taxes (including
the measurement of uncertain tax positions), which impact our provision for taxes; |
|
|
|
|
the valuation of inventory, which impacts gross margin; and |
|
|
|
|
the recognition and measurement of loss contingencies, which impact gross
margin or operating expenses when we recognize a loss contingency, revise the estimate for
a loss contingency, or record an asset impairment. |
Below, we discuss these policies further, as well as the estimates and judgments involved.
Non-Marketable Equity Investments
We regularly invest in non-marketable equity instruments of private companies, which range from
early-stage companies that are often still defining their strategic direction to more mature
companies with established revenue streams and business models. The carrying value of our
non-marketable equity investment portfolio, excluding equity derivatives, totaled $2.7 billion as
of July 2, 2011 ($2.6 billion as of December 25, 2010). Approximately half of this balance as of
July 2, 2011 was concentrated in companies in the flash memory market segment. Our flash memory
market segment investments include our investment in IM Flash Technologies, LLC (IMFT) and IM Flash
Singapore, LLP (IMFS) of $1.3 billion ($1.5 billion as of December 25, 2010). For further
information, see Note 11: Equity Method Investments in the Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.
Our non-marketable equity investments are recorded using the cost method or the equity method of
accounting, depending on the facts and circumstances of each investment. Our non-marketable equity
investments are classified within other long-term assets on the consolidated condensed balance
sheets.
Non-marketable equity investments are inherently risky, and their success is dependent on product
development, market acceptance, operational efficiency, the ability of the investee companies to
raise additional funds in financial markets that can be volatile, and other key business factors.
The companies could fail or not be able to raise additional funds when needed, or they may receive
lower valuations with less favorable investment terms than previous financings. These events could
cause our investments to become impaired. In addition, financial market volatility could negatively
affect our ability to realize value in our investments through liquidity events such as initial
public offerings, mergers, and private sales. For further information about our investment
portfolio risks, see Risk Factors in Part II, Item 1A of this
Form 10-Q.
We determine the fair value of our non-marketable equity investments quarterly for disclosure
purposes; however, the investments are recorded at fair value only if an impairment charge is
recognized. We determine the fair value of our non-marketable equity investments using the market
and income approaches. The market approach includes the use of financial metrics and ratios of
comparable public companies, such as projected revenues, earnings, and comparable performance
multiples. The selection of comparable companies requires management judgment and is based on a
number of factors, including comparable companies sizes, growth rates, industries, development
stages, and other relevant factors. The income approach includes the use of a discounted cash flow
model, which may include one or multiple discounted cash flow scenarios and requires the following
significant estimates for the investee: revenue, based on assumed market segment size and assumed
market segment share; expenses, capital spending, and other costs; and discount rates based on the
risk profile of comparable companies. Estimates of market segment size, market segment share,
expenses, capital spending, and other costs are developed using historical data and available
market data. The valuation of our non-marketable equity investments also takes into account
variables such as conditions reflected in the capital markets, recent financing activities by the
investees, the investees capital structures, and the terms of the investees issued interests.
35
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
For non-marketable equity investments, the measurement of fair value requires significant judgment
and includes quantitative and qualitative analysis of identified events or circumstances that
impact the fair value of the investment, such as:
|
|
|
|
the investees revenue and earnings trends relative to pre-defined milestones and overall business
prospects; |
|
|
|
the technological feasibility of the investees products and technologies; |
|
|
|
|
the general market conditions in the investees industry or geographic area,
including adverse regulatory or economic changes; |
|
|
|
|
factors related to the investees ability to remain in business, such as the
investees liquidity, debt ratios, and the rate at which the investee is using its cash;
and |
|
|
|
|
the investees receipt of additional funding at a lower valuation. |
If the fair value of an investment is below our carrying value, we determine if the investment is
other than temporarily impaired based on our quantitative and qualitative analysis, which includes
assessing the severity and duration of the impairment and the likelihood of recovery before
disposal. If the investment is considered to be other than temporarily impaired, we write down the
investment to its fair value. Impairments of non-marketable equity investments were $8 million in
the second quarter of 2011 ($22 million in the first half of 2011). Over the past 12 quarters,
including the second quarter of 2011, impairments of non-marketable equity investments ranged from
$8 million to $896 million per quarter. This range included impairments of $896 million during the
fourth quarter of 2008, primarily related to a $762 million impairment charge on our investment in
Clearwire Communications, LLC.
IMFT/IMFS
IMFT and IMFS are variable interest entities that are designed to manufacture and sell NAND
products to Intel and Micron Technology, Inc. at manufacturing cost. We determine the fair value of
our investment in IMFT/IMFS using the income approach based on a weighted average of multiple
discounted cash flow scenarios of our NAND Solutions Group business, which requires the use of
unobservable inputs. Unobservable inputs that require us to make our most difficult and subjective
judgments are the estimates for projected revenue and discount rate. Changes in management
estimates for these unobservable inputs have the most significant effect on the fair value
determination. We have not had an other-than-temporary impairment of our investment in IMFT/IMFS.
Long-Lived Assets
Property, Plant and Equipment
We assess property, plant and equipment for impairment when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of the assets or the asset grouping may not be recoverable.
Factors that we consider in deciding when to perform an impairment review include significant
under-performance of a business or product line in relation to expectations, significant negative
industry or economic trends, and significant changes or planned changes in our use of the assets.
We measure the recoverability of assets that will continue to be used in our operations by
comparing the carrying value of the asset grouping to our estimate of the related total future
undiscounted net cash flows. If an asset groupings carrying value is not recoverable through the
related undiscounted cash flows, the asset grouping is considered to be impaired. The impairment is
measured by comparing the difference between the asset groupings carrying value and its fair
value. Property, plant and equipment is considered a non-financial asset and is recorded at fair
value only if an impairment charge is recognized.
Impairments are determined for groups of assets related to the lowest level of identifiable
independent cash flows. Due to our asset usage model and the interchangeable nature of our
semiconductor manufacturing capacity, we must make subjective judgments in determining the
independent cash flows that can be related to specific asset groupings. In addition, as we make
manufacturing process conversions and other factory planning decisions, we must make subjective
judgments regarding the remaining useful lives of assets, primarily process-specific semiconductor
manufacturing tools and building improvements. When we determine that the useful lives of assets
are shorter than we had originally estimated, we accelerate the rate of depreciation over the
assets new, shorter useful lives. Over the past 12 quarters, including the second quarter of 2011,
impairments and accelerated depreciation of long-lived assets ranged from $10 million to $75
million per quarter.
Goodwill
Goodwill is recorded when the purchase price paid for an acquisition exceeds the estimated fair
value of the net identified tangible and intangible assets acquired. Goodwill is allocated to our
reporting units based on relative fair value of the future benefit of the purchased operations to
our existing business units as well as the acquired business unit.
36
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
We perform an annual review in the fourth quarter of each year, or more frequently if indicators of
potential impairment exist, to determine if the carrying value of the recorded goodwill is
impaired. Our impairment review process compares the fair value of the reporting unit in which
goodwill resides to its carrying value. Reporting units may be operating segments as a whole or an
operation one level below an operating segment, referred to as a component. Our reporting units are
consistent with the operating segments identified in Note 27: Operating Segment Information in
the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.
If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets assigned
to that unit, goodwill is not considered impaired and we are not required to perform further
testing. If the carrying value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds the fair
value of the reporting unit, then we must perform the second step of the impairment test in order
to determine the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill. If the carrying value of a
reporting units goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, we would record an impairment loss equal
to the difference.
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit involves the use of significant estimates and
assumptions. Our impairment review process uses the income method to estimate the reporting units
fair value and is based on a discounted future cash flow approach that uses the following reporting
unit estimates: revenue, based on assumed market segment growth rates and Intels assumed market
segment share; estimated costs; and appropriate discount rates based on the reporting units
weighted average cost of capital as determined by considering the observable weighted average cost
of capital of comparable companies. Our estimates of market segment growth, our market segment
share and costs are based on historical data, various internal estimates and a variety of external
sources, and are developed as part of our routine long-range planning process. The same estimates
are also used in planning for our long-term manufacturing and assembly and test capacity needs as
part of our capital budgeting process and for both long-term and short-term business planning and
forecasting. We test the reasonableness of the inputs and outcomes of our discounted cash flow
analysis against available comparable market data. In determining the carrying value of the
reporting unit, we must include an allocation of our manufacturing and assembly and test assets
because of the interchangeable nature of our manufacturing and assembly and test capacity. This
allocation is based on each reporting units relative percentage utilization of our manufacturing
and assembly and test assets.
During the fourth quarter of each of the prior two fiscal years, we completed our annual impairment
reviews and concluded that goodwill was not impaired in either of these years.
Identified Intangibles
We make judgments about the recoverability of purchased finite lived intangible assets whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that an impairment may exist. Recoverability of finite
lived intangible assets is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the future
undiscounted cash flows the asset is expected to generate. We review indefinite lived intangible
assets for impairment quarterly and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying value may not be recoverable. Recoverability of indefinite lived intangible assets is
measured by comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the future discounted cash flows the
asset is expected to generate. If it is determined that an individual asset is impaired, the amount
of any impairment is measured as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of
the impaired asset.
The assumptions and estimates used to determine future values and remaining useful lives of our
intangible and other long-lived assets are complex and subjective. They can be affected by various
factors, including external factors such as industry and economic trends, and internal factors such
as changes in our business strategy and our forecasts for specific product lines. Based on our
impairment reviews of our intangible assets, we have not recognized any impairment charges in 2011
or 2010.
Income Taxes
We must make estimates and judgments in determining the provision for taxes for financial statement
purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of tax credits, benefits, and
deductions, and in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities that arise from
differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement
purposes, as well as the interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions. Significant
changes in these estimates may result in an increase or decrease to our tax provision in a
subsequent period.
We must assess the likelihood that we will be able to recover our deferred tax assets. If recovery
is not likely, we must increase our provision for taxes by recording a valuation allowance against
the deferred tax assets that we estimate will not ultimately be recoverable. We believe that we
will ultimately recover the deferred tax assets recorded on our consolidated condensed balance
sheets. However, should there be a change in our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, our
tax provision would increase in the period in which we determined that the recovery was not likely.
Recovery of a portion of our deferred tax assets is impacted by managements plans with respect to
holding or disposing of certain investments; therefore, changes in managements plans with respect
to holding or disposing of investments could affect our future provision for taxes.
37
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of
complex tax regulations. We recognize liabilities for uncertain tax positions based on a two-step
process. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the
weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be
sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. If we
determine that a tax position will more likely than not be sustained on audit, the second step
requires us to estimate and measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50%
likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. It is inherently difficult and subjective to
estimate such amounts, as we have to determine the probability of various possible outcomes. We
re-evaluate these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors
such as changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, new audit activity, and effectively
settled issues. Determining whether an uncertain tax position is effectively settled requires
judgment. Such a change in recognition or measurement would result in the recognition of a tax
benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision.
Inventory
The valuation of inventory requires us to estimate obsolete or excess inventory as well as
inventory that is not of saleable quality. The determination of obsolete or excess inventory
requires us to estimate the future demand for our products. The estimate of future demand is
compared to work-in-process and finished goods inventory levels to determine the amount, if any, of
obsolete or excess inventory. As of July 2, 2011, we had total work-in-process inventory of $1.5
billion and total finished goods inventory of $2.0 billion. The demand forecast is included in the
development of our short-term manufacturing plans to enable consistency between inventory valuation
and build decisions. Product-specific facts and circumstances reviewed in the inventory valuation
process include a review of the customer base, the stage of the product life cycle of our products,
consumer confidence, and customer acceptance of our products, as well as an assessment of the
selling price in relation to the product cost. If our demand forecast for specific products is
greater than actual demand and we fail to reduce manufacturing output accordingly, we could be
required to write off inventory, which would negatively impact our gross margin.
In order to determine what costs can be included in the valuation of inventory, we must determine
normal capacity at our manufacturing and assembly and test facilities, based on historical loadings
compared to total available capacity. If the factory loadings are below the established normal
capacity level, a portion of our manufacturing overhead costs would not be included in the cost of
inventory, and therefore would be recognized as cost of sales in that period, which would
negatively impact our gross margin. We refer to these costs as excess capacity charges. Over the
past 12 quarters, excess capacity charges ranged from zero to $680 million per quarter.
Loss Contingencies
We are subject to various legal and administrative proceedings and asserted and potential
claims, accruals related to repair or replacement of parts in connection with product errata, as
well as product warranties and potential asset impairments (loss contingencies) that arise in the
ordinary course of business. An estimated loss from such contingencies is recognized as a charge to
income if it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be
reasonably estimated based on the best information available at that time. A loss contingency is
disclosed when there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss has been incurred. The
outcomes of legal and administrative proceedings and claims, and the estimation of product
warranties and asset impairments, are subject to significant uncertainty. Significant judgment is
required in both the determination of probability and the determination as to whether a loss is
reasonably estimable. With respect to estimating the losses associated with repairing and replacing
parts in connection with product errata, we make judgments with respect to customer return rates,
costs to repair or replace parts, and where the product is in our customers manufacturing process.
At least quarterly, we review the status of each significant matter, and we may revise our
estimates as additional information becomes available. These revisions could have a material impact
on our results of operations and financial position.
Accounting Changes and Recent Accounting Standards
For a description of accounting changes see Note 3: Accounting Changes and Note 4: Recent
Accounting Standards in the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements of this Form
10-Q.
38
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Results of Operations - Second Quarter of 2011 Compared to Second Quarter of 2010
The following table sets forth certain consolidated condensed statements of operations data as a
percentage of net revenue for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
Q2 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net |
|
(Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) |
|
Dollars |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Revenue |
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
13,032 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
10,765 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
5,130 |
|
|
|
39.4 |
% |
|
|
3,530 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
7,902 |
|
|
|
60.6 |
% |
|
|
7,235 |
|
|
|
67.2 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
% |
Marketing, general and administrative |
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
% |
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
3,935 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
% |
|
|
3,981 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
% |
Gains (losses) on equity method investments, net |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Gains (losses) on other equity investments, net |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Interest and other, net |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
3,931 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
% |
|
|
4,185 |
|
|
|
38.9 |
% |
Provision for taxes |
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,954 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
$ |
2,887 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth information of geographic regions for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
Q2 2010 |
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
Revenue |
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
% of Total |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
$ |
7,391 |
|
|
|
57 |
% |
|
$ |
6,166 |
|
|
|
57 |
% |
Americas |
|
|
2,909 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
2,173 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Europe |
|
|
1,564 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Japan |
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,032 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
10,765 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our net revenue for Q2 2011 increased $2.3 billion, or 21%, compared to Q2 2010. The increase was
due to higher platform (microprocessor and chipset) average selling prices and $1.0 billion in
revenue from Intel Mobile Communications (formerly the WLS business of Infineon) and McAfee. We
acquired the WLS business of Infineon and McAfee in Q1 2011. Revenue in the Americas, Europe,
Asia-Pacific, and Japan regions increased by 34%, 21%, 20%, and 3%, respectively, compared to Q2
2010.
Our overall gross margin dollars for Q2 2011 increased $667 million, or 9%, compared to Q2 2010.
The increase was primarily due to significantly higher revenue. The increase was partially offset
by approximately $430 million of higher start-up costs compared to Q2 2010. To a lesser extent,
higher platform unit costs also offset the increase to our overall gross margin dollars. The
amortization of acquisition-related intangibles resulted in a $137 million reduction to our overall
gross margin dollars in Q2 2011, compared to $16 million in Q2 2010, primarily due to the
acquisitions of McAfee and the WLS business of Infineon.
Our overall gross margin percentage decreased to 60.6% in Q2 2011 from 67.2% in Q2 2010. The
decrease in gross margin percentage was primarily attributable to the gross margin percentage
decrease in the PC Client Group operating segment and, to a lesser extent, the gross margin
percentage decrease in the other Intel architecture operating segments. We derived a majority of
our overall gross margin dollars in Q2 2011 and a substantial majority of our overall gross margin
dollars in Q2 2010 from the sale of microprocessors in the PC Client Group and Data Center Group
operating segments. See Business Outlook for a discussion of gross margin expectations.
39
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
PC Client Group
The revenue and operating income for the PC Client Group (PCCG) operating segment for Q2 2011 and
Q2 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
Q2 2010 |
|
Microprocessor revenue |
|
$ |
6,533 |
|
|
$ |
5,902 |
|
Chipset, motherboard, and other revenue |
|
|
1,788 |
|
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
8,321 |
|
|
$ |
7,501 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
3,284 |
|
|
$ |
3,333 |
|
Net revenue for the PCCG operating segment increased by $820 million, or 11%, in Q2 2011 compared
to Q2 2010. Microprocessors and chipsets within PCCG include those designed for the notebook and
desktop computing market segments. The increase in microprocessor revenue was due to significantly
higher notebook average selling prices. To a lesser extent, higher desktop average selling prices
and slightly higher notebook unit sales also contributed to the increase. The increase in chipset,
motherboard, and other revenue was due to significantly higher chipset unit sales.
Operating income decreased by $49 million in Q2 2011 compared to Q2 2010. The decrease in operating
income was due to approximately $400 million of higher start-up costs and, to a lesser extent,
higher platform unit costs and higher inventory write-offs in Q2 2011 compared to Q2 2010. These
decreases were partially offset by higher revenue compared to Q2 2010.
Data Center Group
The revenue and operating income for the Data Center Group (DCG) operating segment for Q2 2011 and
Q2 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
Q2 2010 |
|
Microprocessor revenue |
|
$ |
2,054 |
|
|
$ |
1,797 |
|
Chipset, motherboard, and other revenue |
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
2,436 |
|
|
$ |
2,114 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
1,204 |
|
|
$ |
1,061 |
|
Net revenue for the DCG operating segment increased by $322 million, or 15%, in Q2 2011 compared to
Q2 2010. The increase in microprocessor revenue was due to significantly higher microprocessor unit
sales and, to a lesser extent, slightly higher microprocessor average selling prices. The increase
in chipset, motherboard, and other revenue was due to significantly higher revenue from the sale of
wired connectivity products, and slightly higher chipset unit sales.
Operating income increased by $143 million in Q2 2011 compared to Q2 2010. The increase in
operating income was primarily due to higher revenue, partially offset by higher operating expenses
compared to Q2 2010.
Other Intel Architecture Operating Segments
The revenue and operating income for the other Intel architecture (Other IA) operating segments,
including Intel Mobile Communications (IMC), the Embedded and Communications Group (ECG), the
Netbook and Tablet Group (NTG), the Digital Home Group (DHG), and the Ultra-Mobility Group (UMG),
for Q2 2011 and Q2 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
Q2 2010 |
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
1,389 |
|
|
$ |
755 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
$ |
76 |
|
Net revenue for the Other IA operating segments increased by $634 million, or 84%, in Q2 2011
compared to Q2 2010. The increase was primarily due to IMC revenue, an operating segment formed
from the acquisition of the WLS business of Infineon. To a lesser extent, significantly higher ECG
microprocessor unit sales and significantly higher ECG microprocessor average selling prices also
contributed to the increase. These increases were partially offset by significantly lower NTG
microprocessor unit sales.
Operating results for the Other IA operating segments decreased by $109 million, from an operating
gain of $76 million in Q2 2010 to an operating loss of $33 million in Q2 2011. The decline in
operating results was primarily due to higher operating expenses within each of the Other IA
operating segments, partially offset by higher revenue.
40
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Software and Services Operating Segments
The revenue and operating income for the Software and Services operating segments, including
McAfee, Wind River Software Group, and Software and Services Group, for Q2 2011 and Q2 2010 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
Q2 2010 |
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
511 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
Operating loss |
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
(48 |
) |
Net revenue for the Software and Services operating segments increased by $446 million in Q2 2011
compared to Q2 2010. The increase was primarily due to revenue from the acquisition of McAfee and,
to a lesser extent, significantly higher revenue from the Wind River Software Group. Due to the
revaluation of McAfees historic deferred revenue to fair value, we excluded $80 million of revenue
that would have been reported in Q2 2011 if McAfees deferred revenue had not been written down due
to the acquisition.
Operating loss for the Software and Services operating segments decreased by $34 million in Q2 2011
compared to Q2 2010, primarily due to higher revenue and operating expenses from the acquisition of
McAfee. Due to the revaluation of McAfees historic deferred revenue to fair value, we excluded
revenue and associated costs that would have created $75 million of operating income in Q2 2011.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for Q2 2011 and Q2 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
Q2 2010 |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
1,986 |
|
|
$ |
1,666 |
|
Marketing, general and administrative |
|
$ |
1,905 |
|
|
$ |
1,584 |
|
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles |
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Research and Development. R&D spending increased by $320 million, or 19%, in Q2 2011 compared to Q2
2010. This increase was primarily due to the expenses of McAfee and Intel Mobile Communications, and
higher compensation expense based on an increase in employees. These increases were partially
offset by lower process development costs as we transition from R&D to manufacturing using our 22nm
process technology.
Marketing, General and Administrative. Marketing, general and administrative expenses increased by
$321 million, or 20%, in Q2 2011 compared to Q2 2010. This increase was primarily due to the
expenses of McAfee and Intel Mobile Communications, and higher compensation expense based on an
increase in employees.
R&D, combined with marketing, general and administrative expenses, were 30% of net revenue in Q2
2011 and Q2 2010.
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles. The increase of $72 million was primarily due to
the amortization of intangibles related to the acquisitions of McAfee and the WLS business of
Infineon, both completed in the first quarter of 2011. For further information, see Note 15:
Acquisitions and Note 18: Identified Intangible Assets in the Notes to Consolidated Condensed
Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.
Gains (Losses) on Equity Method Investments, Net
Gains (losses) on equity method investments, net were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
Q2 2010 |
|
Equity method losses, net |
|
$ |
(67 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) on equity method investments, net |
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recognized lower gains on sales and higher equity method losses in Q2 2011 compared to Q2 2010.
The most significant components of our Equity method losses, net were Clearwire LLC ($46 million
loss in Q2 2011 and $18 million loss in Q2 2010) and Numonyx B.V. ($29 million gain in Q2 2010).
During Q2 2010, we recognized a gain of $91 million on the sale of our ownership interest in
Numonyx, included in Other, net.
41
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Gains (Losses) on Other Equity Investments, Net
Gains (losses) on other equity investments, net were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
Q2 2010 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
Gains on sales, net |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) on other equity investments, net |
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recognized lower gains on other equity transactions, partially offset by higher gains on sales
of other equity investments in Q2 2011 compared to Q2 2010.
Other, net for Q2 2010 was primarily related to fair value gains on the equity interest in
Micron we received from the sale of our ownership interest in Numonyx and gains on equity options
established prior to the Numonyx sale that economically hedged a portion of our Micron equity
interest. During Q2 2011, we sold our remaining ownership interest in Micron and the related equity
options matured.
Interest and Other, Net
The components of interest and other, net were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
Q2 2010 |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and other, net |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recognized lower interest income in Q2 2011 compared to Q2 2010 as a result of lower average
investment balances.
Provision for Taxes
Our provision for taxes and effective tax rate were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
Q2 2010 |
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
3,931 |
|
|
$ |
4,185 |
|
Provision for taxes |
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
24.9 |
% |
|
|
31.0 |
% |
The effective tax rate for Q2 2011 was positively impacted by a higher percentage of profits being
derived from lower tax jurisdictions, the reversal of previously accrued taxes related to the
settlement of an uncertain tax position, and higher domestic manufacturing deductions compared to
Q2 2010. Additionally, Q2 2011 included the U.S. research and development tax credit that was
reinstated in December 2010.
42
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Results
of Operations - First Half of 2011 Compared to First Half of 2010
The following table sets forth certain consolidated condensed statements of operations data as a
percentage of net revenue for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2011 |
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net |
|
(Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) |
|
Dollars |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Revenue |
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
25,879 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
21,064 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
10,092 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
% |
|
|
7,300 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
15,787 |
|
|
|
61.0 |
% |
|
|
13,764 |
|
|
|
65.3 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
3,902 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
% |
|
|
3,230 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
% |
Marketing, general and administrative |
|
|
3,680 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
|
3,098 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
% |
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
8,093 |
|
|
|
31.3 |
% |
|
|
7,429 |
|
|
|
35.3 |
% |
Gains (losses) on equity method investments, net |
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
)% |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Gains (losses) on other equity investments, net |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Interest and other, net |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
8,302 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
% |
|
|
7,631 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
% |
Provision for taxes |
|
|
2,188 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
2,302 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
6,114 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
$ |
5,329 |
|
|
|
25.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth information of geographic regions for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2011 |
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
Revenue |
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
% of Total |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
$ |
14,653 |
|
|
|
57 |
% |
|
$ |
12,054 |
|
|
|
57 |
% |
Americas |
|
|
5,624 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
4,079 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
Europe |
|
|
3,209 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
2,698 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Japan |
|
|
2,393 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
2,233 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
25,879 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
21,064 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our net revenue for the first half of 2011, which included 27 weeks, increased $4.8 billion, or
23%, compared to the first half of 2010, which included 26 weeks. The increase was primarily due to
higher platform (microprocessor and chipset) average selling prices and, to a lesser extent,
slightly higher microprocessor unit sales. Revenue from Intel Mobile Communications (formerly the
WLS business of Infineon) and McAfee contributed $1.5 billion to Q2 2011 revenue. Revenue in the
Americas, Asia-Pacific, Europe, and Japan regions increased by 38%, 22%, 19%, and 7%, respectively,
compared to the first half of 2010.
Our overall gross margin dollars increased by $2.0 billion, or 15%, compared to the first half of
2010. The increase was primarily due to significantly higher revenue. The increase was partially
offset by approximately $580 million of higher start-up costs compared to the first half of 2010.
In addition, a charge of $422 million recorded in the first half of 2011 to repair and replace
materials and systems impacted by a design issue related to our Intel® 6 Series Express
Chipset family, also offset the increase to our overall gross margin dollars. For further
information, see Note 20: Chipset Design Issue in the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial
Statements of this Form 10-Q. The amortization of acquisition-related intangibles resulted in a
$210 million reduction to our overall gross margin dollars in the first half of 2011, compared to
$32 million in the first half of 2010, primarily due to the acquisitions of McAfee and the WLS
business of Infineon.
Our overall gross margin percentage decreased to 61.0% in the first half of 2011 from 65.3% in the
first half of 2010. The decrease in gross margin percentage was primarily attributable to the gross
margin percentage decrease in the PC Client group operating segment and, to a lesser extent, the
gross margin percentage decrease in the other Intel architecture operating segments. We derived a
substantial majority of our overall gross margin dollars in the first half of 2011 and first half
of 2010 from the sale of microprocessors in the PC Client Group and Data Center Group operating
segments. See Business Outlook for a discussion of gross margin expectations.
43
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
PC Client Group
The revenue and operating income for the PC Client Group (PCCG) operating segment for the first
half of 2011 and the first half of 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
YTD 2011 |
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
Microprocessor revenue |
|
$ |
13,356 |
|
|
$ |
11,594 |
|
Chipset, motherboard, and other revenue |
|
|
3,586 |
|
|
|
3,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
16,942 |
|
|
$ |
14,876 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
6,827 |
|
|
$ |
6,420 |
|
Net revenue for the PCCG operating segment increased by $2.1 billion, or 14%, in the first half of
2011 compared to the first half of 2010. Microprocessors and chipsets within PCCG include those
designed for the notebook and desktop computing market segments. The increase in microprocessor
revenue was due to significantly higher notebook average selling prices. To a lesser extent, higher
notebook unit sales, higher desktop average selling prices, and slightly higher desktop unit sales
also contributed to the increase. The increase in chipset, motherboard, and other revenue was due
to significantly higher chipset unit sales.
Operating income increased by $407 million in the first half of 2011 compared to the first half of
2010. The increase in operating income was primarily due to higher revenue. The increase was
partially offset by approximately $580 million of higher start-up costs. In addition, a charge of
$422 million recorded in the first half of 2011 to repair and replace materials and systems
impacted by a design issue related to our Intel® 6 Series Express Chipset family also
contributed to the offset. To a lesser extent, inventory write-offs and platform unit costs were
higher compared to the first half of 2010, which also contributed to the offset.
Data Center Group
The revenue and operating income for the Data Center Group (DCG) operating segment for the first
half of 2011 and the first half of 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
YTD 2011 |
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
Microprocessor revenue |
|
$ |
4,115 |
|
|
$ |
3,349 |
|
Chipset, motherboard, and other revenue |
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
4,900 |
|
|
$ |
3,985 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
2,426 |
|
|
$ |
1,894 |
|
Net revenue for the DCG operating segment increased by $915 million, or 23%, in the first half of
2011 compared to the first half of 2010. The increase in microprocessor revenue was due to
significantly higher microprocessor unit sales and, to a lesser extent, slightly higher
microprocessor average selling prices. The increase in chipset, motherboard, and other revenue was
due to significantly higher revenue from the sale of wired connectivity products and higher chipset
unit sales.
Operating income increased by $532 million in the first half of 2011 compared to the first half of
2010. The increase in operating income was primarily due to higher revenue, partially offset by
higher operating expenses compared to the first half of 2010.
Other Intel Architecture Operating Segments
The revenue and operating income for the other Intel architecture (Other IA) operating segments,
including Intel Mobile Communications (IMC), the Embedded and Communications Group (ECG), the
Netbook and Tablet Group (NTG), the Digital Home Group (DHG), and the Ultra-Mobility Group (UMG),
for the first half of 2011 and the first half of 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
YTD 2011 |
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
2,538 |
|
|
$ |
1,429 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(69 |
) |
|
$ |
102 |
|
Net revenue for the Other IA operating segments increased by $1.1 billion, or 78%, in the first
half of 2011 compared to the first half of 2010. The increase was primarily due to IMC revenue, an
operating segment formed from the acquisition of the WLS business of Infineon. To a lesser extent,
significantly higher ECG microprocessor and chipset unit sales and significantly higher ECG
microprocessor average selling prices also contributed to the increase. These increases were
partially offset by significantly lower NTG microprocessor unit sales.
44
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Operating results for the Other IA operating segments decreased by $171 million from an operating
gain of $102 million in the first half of 2010 to an operating loss of $69 million the first half
of 2011. The decline in operating results was primarily due to higher operating expenses within
each of the Other IA operating segments, partially offset by higher revenue.
Software and Services Operating Segments
The revenue and operating income for the Software and Services operating segments, including
McAfee, Wind River Software Group, and Software and Services Group, for the first half of 2011 and
the first half of 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
YTD 2011 |
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
751 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
Operating loss |
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
|
$ |
(92 |
) |
Net revenue for the Software and Services operating segments increased by $628 million in the first
half of 2011 compared to the first half of 2010. The increase was primarily due to revenue from the
acquisition of McAfee and, to a lesser extent, significantly higher revenue from the Wind River
Software Group. Due to the revaluation of McAfees historic deferred revenue to fair value, we
excluded $110 million of revenue that would have been reported in the first half of 2011 if
McAfees deferred revenue had not been written down due to the acquisition.
Operating loss for the Software and Services operating segments decreased by $26 million in the
first half of 2011 compared to the first half of 2010. The impact of higher revenue was mostly
offset by higher operating expenses across each of the Software and Services operating segments.
Due to the revaluation of McAfees historic deferred revenue to fair value, we excluded revenue and
associated costs that would have created $103 million of operating income in the first half of
2011.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the first half of 2011 and the first half of 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
YTD 2011 |
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
3,902 |
|
|
$ |
3,230 |
|
Marketing, general and administrative |
|
$ |
3,680 |
|
|
$ |
3,098 |
|
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles |
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
Research and Development. R&D spending increased by $672 million, or 21%, in the first half of 2011
compared to the first half of 2010. This increase was primarily due to the expenses of McAfee and
Intel Mobile Communications, and higher compensation expenses based on an increase in employees, as
well as an extra work week in the first half of 2011. These increases were partially offset by
lower process development costs as we transition from R&D to manufacturing using our 22nm process
technology.
Marketing, General and Administrative. Marketing, general and administrative expenses increased by
$582 million, or 19%, in the first half of 2011 compared to the first half of 2010. This increase
was primarily due to the expenses of McAfee and Intel Mobile Communications, and higher
compensation expenses based on an increase in employees, as well as an extra work week in the first
half of 2011.
R&D, combined with marketing, general and administrative expenses, were 29% of net revenue in the
first half of 2011 (30% of net revenue in the first half of 2010).
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles. The increase of $105 million was primarily due to
the amortization of intangibles related to the acquisitions of McAfee and the WLS business of
Infineon, both completed in the first quarter of 2011. For further information, see Note 15:
Acquisitions and Note 18: Identified Intangible Assets in the Notes to Consolidated Condensed
Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.
45
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Gains (Losses) on Equity Method Investments, Net
Gains (losses) on equity method investments, net were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
YTD 2011 |
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
Equity method losses, net |
|
$ |
(129 |
) |
|
$ |
(44 |
) |
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) on equity method investments, net |
|
$ |
(108 |
) |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recognized lower gains on sales and higher equity method losses in the first half of 2011
compared to the first half of 2010.
During the first half of 2010, we recognized a gain of $91 million on the sale of our ownership
interest in Numonyx, included in Other, net.
Our equity method losses were primarily related to Clearwire LLC ($95 million loss in the first
half of 2011 and $47 million loss in the first half of 2010) and Numonyx ($42 million gain in the
first half of 2010).
Gains (Losses) on Other Equity Investments, Net
Gains (losses) on other equity investments, net were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
YTD 2011 |
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
$ |
(53 |
) |
Gains on sales, net |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) on other equity investments, net |
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recognized lower gains from other equity transactions and lower gains on sales of other equity
investments, partially offset by lower impairment charges in the first half of 2011 compared to the
first half of 2010. Gains on sales of equity investments in the first half of 2010 included a gain
of $67 million on the sale of shares in Micron.
Other, net in the first half of 2011 primarily related to gains in our Micron equity interest
acquired in the sale of Numonyx in Q2 2010, partially offset by the change in fair value of Micron
equity options that economically hedged our equity interest. Other, net in the first half of 2010
primarily related to fair value gains on our equity interest in Micron. During Q2 2011, we sold our
remaining ownership interest in Micron, and the related equity options matured.
Interest and Other, Net
The components of interest and other, net were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
YTD 2011 |
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and other, net |
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other, net increased in the first half of 2011 compared to the first half of 2010,
primarily due to a $164 million gain recognized upon formation of the Intel-GE Care Innovations,
LLC joint venture during Q1 2011. For further information, see Note 11: Equity Method Investments, in the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.
Provision for Taxes
Our provision for taxes and effective tax rate were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
YTD 2011 |
|
|
YTD 2010 |
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
8,302 |
|
|
$ |
7,631 |
|
Provision for taxes |
|
|
2,188 |
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
26.4 |
% |
|
|
30.2 |
% |
46
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
The effective tax rate for the first half of 2011 was positively impacted by a higher percentage of
profits being derived from lower tax jurisdictions compared to the first half of 2010, as well as
the reversal of previously accrued taxes in the first half of 2011 related to the settlement of an
uncertain tax position. The effective tax rate for the first half of 2011 also included the U.S.
research and development tax credit that was reinstated in December 2010.
Business Outlook
Our future results of operations and the topics of other forward-looking statements contained in
this Form 10-Q, including this MD&A, involve a number of risks and uncertaintiesin particular:
|
|
|
changes in business and economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
revenue and pricing; |
|
|
|
|
gross margin and costs; |
|
|
|
|
pending legal proceedings; |
|
|
|
|
our effective tax rate; |
|
|
|
|
marketing, general and administrative expenses; |
|
|
|
|
our goals and strategies; |
|
|
|
|
new product introductions, and product defects and errata; |
|
|
|
plans to cultivate new businesses; |
|
|
|
|
R&D expenses; |
|
|
|
|
divestitures, acquisitions, or similar transactions; |
|
|
|
|
net gains (losses) from equity investments; |
|
|
|
|
interest and other, net; |
|
|
|
|
capital spending; |
|
|
|
|
depreciation; and |
|
|
|
|
impairment of investments. |
In addition to the various important factors discussed above, a number of other important factors
could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. See the risks described in
Risk Factors in Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q.
Our expectations for the remainder of 2011 are as follows:
Q3 2011
|
|
|
Revenue. $14.0 billion, plus or minus $500 million. |
|
|
|
|
Gross margin percentage. 64% plus or minus a couple percentage points. |
|
|
|
|
Total spending. We expect spending on R&D, plus marketing, general and
administrative expenses to be approximately $4.3 billion. |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation. Approximately $1.3 billion. |
Full Year 2011
|
|
|
Gross margin percentage. 63%, plus or minus a couple percentage points. |
|
|
|
|
Total Spending. We expect spending on R&D, plus marketing, general and
administrative expenses to be $16.2 billion, plus or minus $200 million. |
|
|
|
|
Capital spending. $10.5 billion, plus or minus $400 million. |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation. $5.2 billion, plus or minus $100 million. |
|
|
|
|
2011 will have 53 weeks of business versus the typical 52 weeks. |
Status of Business Outlook
We expect that our corporate representatives will, from time to time, meet publicly or privately
with investors and others, and may reiterate the forward-looking statements contained in the
Business Outlook section and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, including any such statements that are
incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q. At the same time, we will keep this Form 10-Q and our
most current business outlook publicly available on our Investor Relations web site at
www.intc.com. The public can continue to rely on the business outlook published on the web site as
representing our current expectations on matters covered, unless we publish a notice stating
otherwise. The statements in the Business Outlook section and other forward-looking statements in
this Form 10-Q are subject to revision during the course of the year in our quarterly earnings
releases and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings and at other times.
The forward-looking statements in the Business Outlook section will be effective through the
close of business September 16, 2011 unless earlier updated. From the close of business on
September 16, 2011 until our quarterly earnings release is published, presently scheduled for
October 18, 2011, we will observe a quiet period. During the quiet period, the Business Outlook
section and other forward-looking statements first published in our Form 8-K filed on July 20,
2011, as reiterated or updated as applicable in this Form 10-Q, should be considered historical,
speaking as of prior to the quiet period only and not subject to update. During the quiet period,
our representatives will not comment on our business outlook or our financial results or
expectations. The exact timing and duration of the routine quiet period, and any others that we
utilize from time to time, may vary at our discretion.
47
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
Dec. 25, |
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and
marketable debt instruments included in trading assets |
|
$ |
11,537 |
|
|
$ |
21,497 |
|
Loans receivable and other long-term investments |
|
$ |
1,909 |
|
|
$ |
3,876 |
|
Short-term and long-term debt |
|
$ |
2,161 |
|
|
$ |
2,115 |
|
Debt as % of stockholders equity |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
In summary, our cash flows were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
June 26, |
|
(In Millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
7,984 |
|
|
$ |
7,565 |
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(1,427 |
) |
|
|
(4,642 |
) |
Net cash used for financing activities |
|
|
(7,433 |
) |
|
|
(1,396 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(863 |
) |
|
$ |
1,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes
in assets and liabilities.
Cash from operations for the first half of 2011 was $8.0 billion, an increase of $419 million
compared to the first half of 2010 due to adjustments for non-cash items, primarily depreciation
and amortization of intangibles, and higher net income, partially offset by changes in our working
capital.
Changes in assets and liabilities as of July 2, 2011 compared to December 25, 2010 included the
following:
|
|
|
Accrued compensation and benefits decreased due to payout of 2010
profit-dependent compensation. |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes receivable increased due to an increase in income tax prepayments. |
For the first half of 2011, our two largest customers accounted for 35% of net revenue (38% for the
first half of 2010) with one of those customers accounting for 19% of our net revenue, and another
customer accounting for 16% of our net revenue. These two largest customers accounted for 30% of
net accounts receivable at July 2, 2011 (44% at December 25, 2010).
Investing Activities
Cash used for investing activities decreased in the first half of 2011, compared to the first half
of 2010, primarily due to net sales and maturities of available-for-sale investments and trading
assets during the first half of 2011 as compared to net purchases of available-for-sale investments
and trading assets during the first half of 2010, partially offset by higher cash paid for
acquisitions and, to a lesser extent, an increase in capital expenditures as we build and equip our
22nm process technology manufacturing capacity.
Financing Activities
The increase in cash used for financing activities in the first half of 2011, compared to the first
half of 2010, was primarily due to repurchases of common stock under our authorized common stock
repurchase program during the first half of 2011.
Liquidity
Cash generated by operations is our primary source of liquidity. As of July 2, 2011, cash and cash
equivalents, short-term investments, and marketable debt instruments included in trading assets
totaled $11.5 billion ($21.5 billion as of December 25, 2010). The majority of the decrease from
the fourth quarter of 2010 is due to the cash required to fund our acquisition of McAfee in the
first quarter of 2011. In addition to the $11.5 billion, we have $1.9 billion in loans receivable and other
long-term investments that we include when assessing our investment portfolio. Substantially all of
our investments in debt instruments are with A/A2 or better rated issuers, and a substantial
majority of the issuers are rated AA-/Aa3 or better.
48
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Our commercial paper program provides another potential source of liquidity. We have an ongoing
authorization from our Board of Directors to borrow up to $3.0 billion, including through the
issuance of commercial paper. Maximum borrowings under our commercial paper program during the
first half of 2011 were $200 million, although no commercial paper remained outstanding as of July
2, 2011. Our commercial paper was rated A-1+ by Standard & Poors and P-1 by Moodys as of July 2,
2011. We also have an automatic shelf registration statement on file with the SEC pursuant to which
we may offer an unspecified amount of debt, equity, and other securities.
We believe that we have the financial resources needed to meet business requirements for the next
12 months, including capital expenditures for worldwide manufacturing and assembly and test,
working capital requirements, and potential dividends, common stock repurchases, and acquisitions
or strategic investments.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
When determining fair value, we consider the principal or most advantageous market in which we
would transact, and we consider assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the
asset or liability. See Note 5: Fair Value in the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial
Statements of this Form 10-Q.
Credit risk is factored into the valuation of financial instruments that we measure and record at
fair value on a recurring basis. When fair value is determined using pricing models, such as a
discounted cash flow model, the issuers credit risk or Intels credit risk is factored into the
calculation of the fair value, as appropriate.
Marketable Debt Instruments
As of July 2, 2011, our assets measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis included
$12.1 billion of marketable debt instruments. Of these instruments, $1.8 billion was classified as
Level 1, $10.0 billion as Level 2, and $270 million as Level 3.
Our balance of marketable debt instruments that are measured and recorded at fair value on a
recurring basis and classified as Level 1 was classified as such due to the use of observable
market prices for identical securities that are traded in active markets. Management judgment was
required to determine the levels for the frequency of transactions that should be met for a market
to be considered active. Our assessment of an active market for our marketable debt instruments
generally takes into consideration the number of days each individual instrument trades over a
specified period.
Of the $10.0 billion balance of marketable debt instruments measured and recorded at fair value on
a recurring basis and classified as Level 2, approximately 55% of the balance was classified as
Level 2 due to the use of a discounted cash flow model and approximately 45% due to the use of
non-binding market consensus prices that are corroborated with observable market data.
Our marketable debt instruments that are measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis
and classified as Level 3 were classified as such due to the lack of observable market data to
corroborate either the non-binding market consensus prices or the non-binding broker quotes. When
observable market data is not available, we corroborate the non-binding market consensus prices and
non-binding broker quotes using available unobservable data.
Equity Securities
As of July 2, 2011, our portfolio of assets measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring
basis included $902 million of marketable equity securities. Most of these securities were
classified as Level 1 because the valuations were based on quoted prices for identical securities
in active markets. Our assessment of an active market for our marketable equity securities
generally takes into consideration the number of days that each individual equity security trades
over a specified period.
49
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
The information in this section should be read in connection with the information on financial
market risk related to changes in non-U.S. currency exchange rates and changes in interest rates in
Part II, Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2010. All of the potential changes noted below are
based on sensitivity analyses performed on our financial positions as of July 2, 2011 and December
25, 2010. Actual results may differ materially.
Equity Prices
Our marketable equity investments include marketable equity securities and equity derivative
instruments such as warrants and options. To the extent that our marketable equity securities have
strategic value, we typically do not attempt to reduce or eliminate our equity market exposure
through hedging activities; however, for our investments in strategic equity derivative
instruments, we may enter into transactions to reduce or eliminate the equity market risks. For
securities that we no longer consider strategic, we evaluate legal, market, and economic factors in
our decision on the timing of disposal, and whether it is possible and appropriate to hedge the
equity market risk.
We hold derivative instruments that seek to offset changes in liabilities related to the equity
market risks of certain deferred compensation arrangements. The gains and losses from changes in
fair value of these derivatives are designed to offset the gains and losses on the related
liabilities, resulting in an insignificant net exposure to loss.
As of July 2, 2011, the fair value of our marketable equity investments and our equity derivative
instruments, including hedging positions, was $919 million ($1.5 billion as of December 25, 2010).
Our marketable equity investments in Imagination Technologies Group PLC, VMware Inc., and Clearwire
Corporation were carried at a total fair market value of $591 million, or 64% of our marketable
equity portfolio, as of July 2, 2011. Our marketable equity method investment in SMART Technologies
Inc. is excluded from our analysis, as the carrying value does not fluctuate based on market price
changes unless an other-than-temporary impairment is deemed necessary. To determine reasonably
possible decreases in the market value of our marketable equity investments, we analyzed the
expected market price sensitivity of our marketable equity investment portfolio. Assuming a loss of
40% in market prices, and after reflecting the impact of hedges and offsetting positions, the
aggregate value of our marketable equity investments could decrease by approximately $370 million,
based on the value as of July 2, 2011 (a decrease in value of approximately $365 million, based on
the value as of December 25, 2010 using an assumed loss of 40%).
Many of the same factors that could result in an adverse movement of equity market prices affect
our non-marketable equity investments, although we cannot always quantify the impact directly.
Financial markets are volatile, which could negatively affect the prospects of the companies we
invest in, their ability to raise additional capital, and the likelihood of our being able to
realize value in our investments through liquidity events such as initial public offerings,
mergers, and private sales. These types of investments involve a great deal of risk, and there can
be no assurance that any specific company will grow or become successful; consequently, we could
lose all or part of our investment. Our non-marketable equity investments, excluding investments
accounted for under the equity method, had a carrying amount of $1.0 billion as of July 2, 2011
($872 million as of December 25, 2010). As of July 2, 2011, the carrying amount of our
non-marketable equity method investments was $1.7 billion ($1.8 billion as of December 25, 2010). A
substantial majority of this balance as of July 2, 2011 was concentrated in our IMFT/IMFS
investment of $1.3 billion ($1.5 billion as of December 25, 2010).
50
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Based on managements evaluation (with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and
Chief Financial Officer (CFO)), as of the end of the period covered by this report, our CEO and CFO
have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)), are effective
to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we
file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the
time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to management,
including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes to our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this
report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls or our
internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control
system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute,
assurance that the control systems objectives will be met. The design of a control system must
reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be
considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control
systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error
or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been
detected. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of
the effectiveness of controls to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance
with policies or procedures.
51
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For a discussion of legal proceedings, see Note 26: Contingencies in Part I, Item 1 of this Form
10-Q.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
We describe our business risk factors below. This description includes any material changes to and
supersedes the description of the risk factors associated with our business previously disclosed in
Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2010.
Fluctuations in demand for our products may harm our financial results and are difficult to forecast.
If demand for our products fluctuates, our revenue and profitability could be harmed. Important
factors that could cause demand for our products to fluctuate include:
|
|
|
changes in business and economic conditions, including downturns in the
computing industry and the overall economy; |
|
|
|
|
changes in consumer confidence or disposable income caused by changes in market conditions,
including changes in government borrowing, taxation, or spending policies; the credit market; expectations for inflation, unemployment levels,
and energy or other commodity prices; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the level of customers components inventories; |
|
|
|
|
competitive pressures, including pricing pressures, from companies that have
competing products, chip architectures, manufacturing technologies, and marketing programs; |
|
|
|
|
changes in customer product needs; |
|
|
|
|
strategic actions taken by our competitors; |
|
|
|
|
market acceptance of our products; and |
|
|
|
|
potential disruptions in the high technology supply chain. |
If product demand decreases or we fail to forecast demand accurately, we could be required to write
off inventory or record excess capacity charges, which would have a negative impact on our gross
margin. In addition, if product demand decreases, our manufacturing or assembly and test capacity
could be underutilized, and we may be required to record an impairment on our long-lived assets,
including facilities and equipment as well as intangible assets, which would increase our expenses.
Factory-planning decisions may shorten the useful lives of long-lived assets, including facilities
and equipment, and cause us to accelerate depreciation. In the long term, if product demand
increases, we may not be able to add manufacturing or assembly and test capacity fast enough to
meet market demand. These changes in demand for our products, and changes in our customers product
needs, could have a variety of negative effects on our competitive position and our financial
results, and, in certain cases, may reduce our revenue, increase our costs, lower our gross margin
percentage, or require us to recognize impairments of our assets.
The semiconductor industry and our operations are characterized by a high percentage of costs that
are fixed or difficult to reduce in the short term, and by product demand that is highly variable
and subject to significant downturns that may harm our business, results of operations, and
financial condition.
The semiconductor industry and our operations are characterized by high costs, such as those
related to facility construction and equipment, R&D, and employment and training of a highly
skilled workforce, that are either fixed or difficult to reduce in the short term. At the same
time, demand for our products is highly variable and there have been downturns, often in connection
with maturing product cycles and general economic market conditions. These downturns have been
characterized by reduced product demand, manufacturing overcapacity and resulting excess capacity
charges, high inventory levels, and lower average selling prices. The combination of these factors
may cause our revenue, gross margin, cash flow, and profitability to vary significantly in both the
short and long term.
We operate in intensely competitive industries, and our failure to respond quickly to technological
developments and incorporate new features into our products could harm our ability to compete.
We operate in intensely competitive industries that experience rapid technological developments,
changes in industry standards, changes in customer requirements, and frequent new product
introductions and improvements. If we are unable to respond quickly and successfully to these
developments, we may lose our competitive position, and our products or technologies may become
uncompetitive or obsolete. As new computing market segments emerge, such as netbooks, handhelds,
tablets, and consumer electronics devices, we face new sources of competition, and customers that
have different requirements than customers in our traditional PC business. To be successful, we
need to cultivate new industry relationships in these market segments. As the number and variety of
Internet-connected devices increase, we need to improve the cost, energy efficiency, and security
functionality of our microprocessors to succeed in these new market segments. In addition, we need
to focus on the acquisition and development of our software capabilities in order to provide
customers with complete computing solutions.
52
To compete successfully, we must maintain a successful R&D effort, develop new products and
production processes, and improve our existing products and processes at the same pace or ahead of
our competitors. Our R&D efforts are aimed at solving increasingly complex problems, and we do not
expect that all of our projects will be successful. If our R&D efforts are unsuccessful, our future
results of operations could be materially harmed. We may not be able to develop and market these
new products successfully, the products we invest in and develop may not be well received by
customers, and products developed and new technologies offered by others may affect demand for our
products. These types of events could have a variety of negative effects on our competitive
position and our financial results, such as reducing our revenue, increasing our costs, lowering
our gross margin percentage, and requiring us to recognize impairments on our assets.
Litigation or regulatory proceedings could harm our business.
We may be subject to legal claims or regulatory matters involving stockholder, consumer,
competition, and other issues on a global basis. As described in Note 26: Contingencies in Part
I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q, we are currently engaged in a number of litigation and regulatory
matters. Litigation and regulatory proceedings are subject to inherent uncertainties, and
unfavorable rulings could occur. An unfavorable ruling could include monetary damages or, in cases
for which injunctive relief is sought, an injunction prohibiting us from manufacturing or selling
one or more products, precluding particular business practices, or requiring other remedies, such
as compulsory licensing of intellectual property. If we were to receive an unfavorable ruling in a
matter, our business and results of operations could be materially harmed.
Fluctuations in the mix of products sold may harm our financial results.
Because of the wide price differences among and within notebook, netbook, tablet, desktop, and
server microprocessors, the mix and types of performance capabilities of microprocessors sold
affect the average selling prices of our products and have a substantial impact on our revenue and
gross margin. Our financial results also depend in part on the mix of other products that we sell,
such as chipsets, flash memory, and other semiconductor products. In addition, more recently
introduced products tend to have higher associated costs because of initial overall development and
production ramp. Fluctuations in the mix and types of our products may also affect the extent to
which we are able to recover the fixed costs and investments associated with a particular product,
and as a result can harm our financial results.
Our global operations subject us to risks that may harm our results of operations and financial condition.
We have sales offices, R&D, manufacturing, assembly and test facilities, and other facilities in
many countries, and some business activities may be concentrated in one or more geographic areas.
As a result, we are subject to risks that may limit our ability to manufacture, assemble and test,
design, develop, or sell products in particular countries or on a geographic basis, which could
harm our results of operations and financial condition, including:
|
|
|
security concerns, such as armed conflict and civil or military unrest, crime,
political instability, and terrorist activity; |
|
|
|
|
health concerns; |
|
|
|
|
natural disasters; |
|
|
|
|
inefficient and limited infrastructure and disruptions, such as large-scale
outages or interruptions of service from utilities, transportation, or telecommunications
providers and supply chain interruptions; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on our operations by governments seeking to support local
industries, nationalization of our operations, and restrictions on our ability to
repatriate earnings; |
|
|
|
|
differing employment practices and labor issues; |
|
|
|
|
local business and cultural factors that differ from our normal standards and
practices, including business practices that we are prohibited from engaging in by the
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and other anti-corruption laws and regulations; and |
|
|
|
|
regulatory requirements and prohibitions that differ among jurisdictions. |
Violations of these laws and regulations could result in fines; criminal sanctions against us, our
officers, or our employees; prohibitions on the conduct of our business; and damage to our
reputation. Although we have implemented policies, controls, and procedures designed to ensure
compliance with these laws, our employees, contractors, or agents may violate our policies.
In addition, although substantially all of our revenue is transacted in U.S. dollars, we incur a
significant amount of certain types of expenses, such as payroll, utilities, tax, and marketing
expenses, as well as conduct certain investing and financing activities, in local currencies. Our
hedging programs reduce, but do not entirely eliminate, the impact of currency exchange rate
movements; therefore, fluctuations in exchange rates could harm our results and financial
condition. In addition, changes in tariff and import regulations and in U.S. and non-U.S. monetary
policies may harm our results and financial condition by increasing our expenses and reducing our
revenue. Varying tax rates in different jurisdictions could harm our results of operations and
financial condition by increasing our overall tax rate.
We maintain a program of insurance coverage for various types of property, casualty, and other
risks. We place our insurance coverage with various carriers in numerous jurisdictions. However,
there is a risk that one or more of our insurance providers may be unable or unwilling to pay a
claim. The types and amounts of insurance that we obtain vary from time to time and from location
to location, depending on availability, cost, and our decisions with respect to risk retention. The
policies are subject to deductibles and exclusions that result in our retention of a level of risk
on a self-insurance basis. Losses not covered by insurance may be substantial, which could harm our
results of operations and financial condition.
53
Failure to meet our production targets, resulting in undersupply or oversupply of products,
may harm our business and results of operations.
Production of integrated circuits is a complex process. Disruptions in this process can result from
interruptions in our processes, errors, and difficulties in our development and implementation of
new processes; defects in materials; disruptions in our supply of materials or resources; and
disruptions at our fabrication and assembly and test facilities due to, for example, accidents,
maintenance issues, or unsafe working conditionsall of which could affect the timing of
production ramps and yields. We may not be successful or efficient in developing or implementing
new production processes. The occurrence of any of the foregoing may result in our failure to meet
or increase production as desired, resulting in higher costs or substantial decreases in yields,
which could affect our ability to produce sufficient volume to meet specific product demand. The
unavailability or reduced availability of certain products could make it more difficult to deliver
computing platforms. The occurrence of any of these events could harm our business and results of
operations.
We may have difficulties obtaining the resources or products we need for manufacturing, assembling
and testing our products, or operating other aspects of our business, which could harm our ability
to meet demand for our products and may increase our costs.
We have thousands of suppliers providing various materials that we use in the production of our
products and other aspects of our business, and we seek, where possible, to have several sources of
supply for all of those materials. However, we may rely on a single or a limited number of
suppliers, or upon suppliers in a single location, for these materials. The inability of such
suppliers to deliver adequate supplies of production materials or other supplies could disrupt our
production processes or could make it more difficult for us to implement our business strategy. In
addition, production could be disrupted by the unavailability of the resources used in production,
such as water, silicon, electricity, gases, and other materials. Future environmental regulations
could restrict the supply or increase the cost of certain of the materials that we currently use in
our business. Environmental regulations also may make it more difficult to obtain permits to build
or modify additional manufacturing capacity to meet demand. The unavailability or reduced
availability of the materials or resources that we use in our business may require us to reduce
production of products or may require us to incur additional costs in order to obtain an adequate
supply of those materials or resources. The occurrence of any of these events could harm our
business and results of operations.
Costs related to product defects and errata may harm our results of operations and business.
Costs associated with unexpected product defects and errata (deviations from published
specifications) due to, for example, unanticipated problems in our design and manufacturing
processes, could include:
|
|
|
writing off the value of inventory of such products; |
|
|
|
|
disposing of products that cannot be fixed; |
|
|
|
|
recalling such products that have been shipped to customers; |
|
|
|
|
providing product replacements for, or modifications to, such products; and |
|
|
|
|
defending against litigation related to such products. |
These costs could be substantial and may therefore increase our expenses and lower our gross
margin. In addition, our reputation with our customers or users of our products could be damaged as
a result of such product defects and errata, and the demand for our products could be reduced. The
announcement of product defects and errata could cause customers to purchase products from our
competitors as a result of anticipated shortages of Intel components or for other reasons. These
factors could harm our financial results and the prospects for our business.
We may be subject to claims of infringement of third-party intellectual property rights, which
could harm our business.
Third parties may assert against us or our customers alleged patent, copyright, trademark, or other
intellectual property rights to technologies that are important to our business. We are currently
engaged in a number of litigation matters involving intellectual property rights. We may be subject
to intellectual property infringement claims from certain individuals and companies, including
those who have acquired patent portfolios for the sole purpose of asserting such claims against
other companies. Any claims that our products or processes infringe the intellectual property
rights of others, regardless of the merit or resolution of such claims, could cause us to incur
significant costs in responding to, defending, and resolving such claims, and may divert the
efforts and attention of our management and technical personnel from our business. As a result of
such intellectual property infringement claims, we could be required or otherwise decide that it is
appropriate to:
|
|
|
pay third-party infringement claims; |
|
|
|
|
discontinue manufacturing, using, or selling particular products subject to
infringement claims; |
|
|
|
|
discontinue using the technology or processes subject to infringement claims; |
|
|
|
|
develop other technology not subject to infringement claims, which could be
time-consuming and costly or may not be possible; or |
|
|
|
|
license technology from the third party claiming infringement, which license
may not be available on commercially reasonable terms. |
The occurrence of any of the foregoing could result in unexpected expenses or require us to
recognize an impairment of our assets, which would reduce the value of our assets and increase
expenses. In addition, if we alter or discontinue our production of affected items, our revenue
could be harmed.
54
We may not be able to enforce or protect our intellectual property rights, which may harm our
ability to compete and harm our business.
Our ability to enforce our patents, copyrights, software licenses, and other intellectual property
rights is subject to general litigation risks, as well as uncertainty as to the enforceability of
our intellectual property rights in various countries. When we seek to enforce our rights, we are
often subject to claims that the intellectual property right is invalid, is otherwise not
enforceable, or is licensed to the party against whom we are asserting a claim. In addition, our
assertion of intellectual property rights often results in the other party seeking to assert
alleged intellectual property rights of its own or assert other claims against us, which could harm
our business. If we are not ultimately successful in defending ourselves against these claims in
litigation, we may not be able to sell a particular product or family of products due to an
injunction, or we may have to license the technology or pay damages that could, in turn, harm our
results of operations. In addition, governments may adopt regulations, and governments or courts
may render decisions, requiring compulsory licensing of intellectual property to others, or
governments may require that products meet specified standards that serve to favor local companies.
Our inability to enforce our intellectual property rights under these circumstances may harm our
competitive position and our business.
We may be subject to intellectual property theft or misuse, which could result in third-party
claims and harm our business and results of operations.
We regularly face attempts by others to gain unauthorized access through the Internet to our
information technology systems, such as when they masquerade as authorized users or surreptitiously
introduce software. These attempts, which might be the result of industrial or other espionage, or
actions by hackers seeking to harm the company, its products, or end users, are sometimes
successful. In part because of the high profile of our McAfee subsidiary in the network and system
protection business, we might become a target of computer hackers who create viruses to sabotage or
otherwise attack our products and services. Hackers might attempt to penetrate our network security
and gain access to our network and our data centers, misappropriate our or our customers
proprietary information, including personally identifiable information, or cause interruptions of
our internal systems and services. We seek to detect and investigate these security incidents and
to prevent their recurrence, but in some cases we might be unaware of an incident or its magnitude
and effects. The theft or unauthorized use or publication of our trade secrets and other
confidential business information as a result of such an incident could adversely affect our
competitive position and reduce marketplace acceptance of our products; the value of our investment
in R&D, product development, and marketing could be reduced; and third parties might assert against
us or our customers claims related to resulting losses of confidential or proprietary information
or end-user data, or system reliability. Our business could be subject to significant disruption,
and we could suffer monetary and other losses, including the cost of product recalls and returns
and reputational harm, in the event of such incidents and claims.
Our licenses with other companies and our participation in industry initiatives may allow other
companies, including our competitors, to use our patent rights.
Companies in the computing industry often rely on the ability to license patents from each other in
order to compete. Many of our competitors have broad licenses or cross-licenses with us, and under
current case law, some of the licenses may permit these competitors to pass our patent rights on to
others. If one of these licensees becomes a foundry, our competitors might be able to avoid our
patent rights in manufacturing competing products. In addition, our participation in industry
initiatives may require us to license our patents to other companies that adopt certain industry
standards or specifications, even when such organizations do not adopt standards or specifications
proposed by us. As a result, our patents implicated by our participation in industry initiatives
might not be available for us to enforce against others who might otherwise be deemed to be
infringing those patents, our costs of enforcing our licenses or protecting our patents may
increase, and the value of our intellectual property may be impaired.
We face risks related to our product sales through distributors and other third parties.
We sell a portion of our products through third parties such as distributors, value-added
resellers, original equipment manufacturers, internet service
providers, and channel partners (collectively referred to as distributors). Using third
parties for distribution exposes us to numerous risks, including competitive pressure,
concentration, credit risk, and compliance risks. Our distributors may sell other companies
products that compete with our products, and we may need to provide financial and other incentives
to focus distributors on the sale of our products. We may rely on one or more key distributors for
a particular product, and the loss of these distributors could adversely impact our revenue. Our
distributors may face financial difficulties, including bankruptcy, which could adversely impact
our collection of accounts receivable and negatively affect our financial results. Violations of
FCPA or similar laws by distributors or other third party intermediaries could have a material
impact on our business. If we fail to manage these or other risks related to our use of
distributors successfully, our sales may be reduced, our expenses may be increased, and our
competitive position may be weakened.
We face risks related to our sales to government entities.
We derive a portion of our revenues from sales to U.S. and foreign federal, state, and local
governments and their respective agencies. Government demand and payment for our products may be
affected by public sector budgetary cycles and funding authorizations, and funding reductions or
delays could negatively impact demand for our products and services. Additionally, government
contracts are subject to government oversight on matters such as special rules on accounting,
expenses, reviews and security, and our failure to comply with such special rules could result in
civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanction, including termination of contracts, fines
and suspensions, or debarment from future government business.
55
We invest in companies for strategic reasons and may not realize a return on our investments.
We make investments in companies around the world to further our strategic objectives and support
our key business initiatives. Such investments include equity or debt instruments of public or
private companies, and many of these instruments are non-marketable at the time of our initial
investment. These companies range from early-stage companies that are often still defining their
strategic direction to more mature companies with established revenue streams and business models.
The success of these companies is dependent on product development, market acceptance, operational
efficiency, and other key business factors. The companies in which we invest may fail because they
may not be able to secure additional funding, obtain favorable investment terms for future
financings, or participate in liquidity events such as public offerings, mergers, and private
sales. If any of these private companies fail, we could lose all or part of our investment in that
company. If we determine that an other-than-temporary decline in the fair value exists for an
equity or debt investment in a public or private company in which we have invested, we write down
the investment to its fair value and recognize the related write-down as an investment loss. We
also have significant investments in companies in the flash memory market segment, and declines in
this market segment or changes in managements plans with respect to our investments in this market
segment could result in significant impairment charges, impacting gains (losses) on equity method
investments, net and gains (losses) on other equity investments, net.
When the strategic objectives of an investment have been achieved, or if the investment or business
diverges from our strategic objectives, we may decide to dispose of the investment. We may incur
losses on the disposal of our non-marketable investments. Additionally, for cases in which we are
required under equity method accounting to recognize a proportionate share of another companys
income or loss, such income or loss may impact our earnings. Gains or losses from equity securities
could vary from expectations depending on gains or losses realized on the sale or exchange of
securities, gains or losses from equity method investments, and impairment charges for equity and
other investments.
Our results of operations could vary as a result of the methods, estimates, and judgments that we
use in applying our accounting policies.
The methods, estimates, and judgments that we use in applying our accounting policies have a
significant impact on our results of operations (see Critical Accounting Estimates in Part I,
Item 2 of this Form 10-Q). Such methods, estimates, and judgments are, by their nature, subject to
substantial risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, and factors may arise over time that lead us to
change our methods, estimates, and judgments. Changes in those methods, estimates, and judgments
could significantly affect our results of operations.
Changes in our effective tax rate may harm our results of operations.
A number of factors may increase our future effective tax rates, including:
|
|
|
the jurisdictions in which profits are determined to be earned and taxed; |
|
|
|
|
the resolution of issues arising from tax audits with various tax authorities; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, and
changes in deferred tax valuation allowances; |
|
|
|
|
adjustments to income taxes upon finalization of various tax returns; |
|
|
|
|
increases in expenses not deductible for tax purposes, including write-offs of
acquired in-process research and development and impairments of goodwill in connection with
acquisitions; |
|
|
|
|
changes in available tax credits; |
|
|
|
|
changes in tax laws or the interpretation of such tax laws, including changes
in the U.S. to the taxation of foreign income and expenses; |
|
|
|
|
changes in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; and |
|
|
|
|
our decision to repatriate non-U.S. earnings for which we have not previously
provided for U.S. taxes. |
Any significant increase in our future effective tax rates could reduce net income for future
periods.
Decisions about the scope of operations of our business could affect our results of operations and
financial condition.
Changes in the business environment could lead to changes in our decisions about the scope of
operations of our business, and these changes could result in restructuring and asset impairment
charges. Factors that could affect our results of operations and financial condition with regard to
changing the scope of our operations include:
|
|
|
timing and execution of plans and programs that may be subject to local labor
law requirements, including consultation with appropriate work councils; |
|
|
|
|
changes in assumptions related to severance and postretirement costs; |
|
|
|
|
future divestitures; |
|
|
|
|
new business initiatives and changes in product roadmap, development, and
manufacturing; |
|
|
|
|
changes in employment levels and turnover rates; |
|
|
|
|
changes in product demand and the business environment; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in the fair value of certain long-lived assets. |
56
Our acquisitions, divestitures, and other transactions could disrupt our ongoing business and harm
our results of operations.
In pursuing our business strategy, we routinely conduct discussions, evaluate opportunities, and
enter into agreements regarding possible investments, acquisitions, divestitures, and other
transactions, such as joint ventures. Acquisitions and other transactions involve significant
challenges and risks, including risks that:
|
|
|
we may not be able to identify suitable opportunities on terms acceptable to
us; |
|
|
|
|
the transaction may not advance our business strategy; |
|
|
|
|
we may not realize a satisfactory return on the investment we make; |
|
|
|
|
we may not be able to retain key personnel of the acquired business; |
|
|
|
|
we may experience difficulty in integrating new employees, business systems,
and technology; |
|
|
|
|
acquired businesses may not have adequate controls, processes, and procedures
to ensure compliance with laws and regulations globally, and our due diligence process may
not identify compliance issues or other liabilities that are in existence at the time of
our acquisition; |
|
|
|
|
we may have difficulty entering into new market segments in which we are not
experienced; or |
|
|
|
|
we may be unable to retain the customers and partners of acquired businesses
following the acquisition. |
When we decide to sell assets or a business, we may encounter difficulty in finding or completing
divestiture opportunities or alternative exit strategies on acceptable terms in a timely manner,
and the agreed terms and financing arrangements could be renegotiated due to changes in business or
market conditions. These circumstances could delay the accomplishment of our strategic objectives
or cause us to incur additional expenses with respect to businesses that we want to dispose of, or
we may dispose of a business at a price or on terms that are less favorable than we had
anticipated, resulting in a loss on the transaction.
If we do enter into agreements with respect to acquisitions, divestitures, or other transactions,
we may fail to complete them due to factors such as:
|
|
|
failure to obtain required regulatory or other approvals; |
|
|
|
|
intellectual property or other litigation; or |
|
|
|
|
difficulties that we or other parties may encounter in obtaining financing for
the transaction. |
In order to compete, we must attract, retain, and motivate key employees, and our failure to do so
could harm our results of operations.
In order to compete, we must attract, retain, and motivate executives and other key employees.
Hiring and retaining qualified executives, scientists, engineers, technical staff, and sales
representatives are critical to our business, and competition for experienced employees in the
computing industry can be intense. To help attract, retain, and motivate qualified employees, we
use share-based incentive awards such as non-vested share units (restricted stock units) and
employee stock options. If the value of such stock awards does not appreciate as measured by the
performance of the price of our common stock, or if our share-based compensation otherwise ceases
to be viewed as a valuable benefit, our ability to attract, retain, and motivate employees could be
weakened, which could harm our results of operations.
Our failure to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations worldwide could harm our
business and results of operations.
The manufacturing and assembling and testing of our products require the use of hazardous materials
that are subject to a broad array of EHS laws and regulations. Our failure to comply with any of
those applicable laws or regulations could result in:
|
|
|
regulatory penalties, fines, and legal liabilities; |
|
|
|
|
suspension of production; |
|
|
|
|
alteration of our fabrication and assembly and test processes; and |
|
|
|
|
curtailment of our operations or sales. |
In addition, our failure to manage the use, transportation, emissions, discharge, storage,
recycling, or disposal of hazardous materials could subject us to increased costs or future
liabilities. Existing and future environmental laws and regulations could also require us to
acquire pollution abatement or remediation equipment, modify our product designs, or incur other
expenses associated with such laws and regulations. Many new materials that we are evaluating for
use in our operations may be subject to regulation under existing or future environmental laws and
regulations that may restrict our use of one or more of such materials in our manufacturing,
assembly and test processes, or products. Any of these restrictions could harm our business and
results of operations by increasing our expenses or requiring us to alter our manufacturing and
assembly and test processes.
57
Climate change poses both regulatory and physical risks that could harm our results of operations
or affect the way we conduct our business.
In addition to the possible direct economic impact that climate change could have on us, climate
change mitigation programs and regulations can increase our costs. For example, the cost of
perfluorocompounds (PFCs), a gas that we use in manufacturing, could increase over time under some
climate-change-focused emissions trading programs that may be imposed by government regulation. If
the use of PFCs is prohibited, we would need to obtain substitute materials that may cost more or
be less available for our manufacturing operations. In addition, air quality permit requirements
for our manufacturing operations could become more burdensome and cause delays in our ability to
modify or build additional manufacturing capacity. Under recently adopted greenhouse gas
regulations in the U.S., many of our manufacturing facilities have become major sources under the
Clean Air Act. At a minimum, this change in status will result in some uncertainty as the EPA
adopts guidance on implementation of its greenhouse gas regulations. Due to the dynamic nature of
our semiconductor manufacturing operations, it is likely these new regulations will result in
increased costs for our U.S. operations. These cost increases could be associated with new air
pollution control requirements, and increased or new monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting of
greenhouse gas emissions. We also see the potential for higher energy costs driven by climate
change regulations. Our costs could increase if utility companies pass on their costs, such as
those associated with carbon taxes, emission cap and trade programs, or renewable portfolio
standards. While we maintain business recovery plans that are intended to allow us to recover from
natural disasters or other events that can be disruptive to our business, we cannot be sure that
our plans will fully protect us from all such disasters or events. Many of our operations are
located in semi-arid regions, such as Israel and the southwestern U.S. Some scenarios predict that
these regions may become even more vulnerable to prolonged droughts due to climate change.
Interest and other, net could be impacted by macroeconomic and other factors, harming our results
of operations.
Factors that could cause interest and other, net in our consolidated condensed statements of income
to fluctuate include:
|
|
|
fixed-income, equity, and credit market volatility; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in interest rates; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the credit standing of financial instrument counterparties; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in our cash and investment balances. |
58
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
We have an ongoing authorization, since October 2005, as amended, from our Board of Directors to
repurchase up to $35 billion in shares of our common stock in open market or negotiated
transactions. As of July 2, 2011, $8.2 billion remained available for repurchase under the existing
repurchase authorization limit.
Common stock repurchase activity under our authorized plan during the second quarter of 2011 was as
follows (in millions, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Dollar Value of |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Shares that May |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Under the Plans |
|
April 3, 2011-April 30, 2011 |
|
|
54.6 |
|
|
$ |
20.16 |
|
|
|
54.6 |
|
|
$ |
9,131 |
|
May 1, 2011-May 28, 2011 |
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
$ |
23.25 |
|
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
$ |
8,231 |
|
May 29, 2011-July 2, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
93.3 |
|
|
$ |
21.45 |
|
|
|
93.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our repurchases during the second quarter of 2011 were executed in privately negotiated
transactions.
For the majority of restricted stock units granted, the number of shares issued on the date the
restricted stock units vest is net of the minimum statutory withholding requirements that we pay in
cash to the appropriate taxing authorities on behalf of our
employees. Although these withheld shares are not issued or considered common stock repurchases under our
authorized plan and are not included in the common stock repurchase totals in the preceding table,
they are treated as common stock repurchases in our financial statements, as they reduce the number
of shares that would have been issued upon vesting.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Disclosure Regarding Frequency of Stockholder Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 19, 2011, a majority of our stockholders voted in
favor of holding an advisory vote to approve executive compensation every year. The Board of
Directors has carefully considered the voting results on that proposal and determined to adopt a
policy providing for an annual advisory stockholder vote on executive compensation.
59
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing |
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File Number |
|
Exhibit |
|
Date |
|
Herewith |
|
3.1 |
|
|
Intel Corporation Third Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of Intel
Corporation dated May 17, 2006 |
|
8-K |
|
000-06217 |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
5/22/2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Intel Corporation Bylaws, as amended and
restated on July 26, 2011 |
|
8-K |
|
000-06217 |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
7/27/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
** |
|
Intel Corporation 2006 Equity Incentive Plan
as Amended and Restated Effective May 19, 2011 |
|
S-8 |
|
333-175123 |
|
|
99.1 |
|
|
6/24/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
** |
|
Intel Corporation 2006 Stock Purchase Plan |
|
S-8 |
|
333-175123 |
|
|
99.2 |
|
|
6/24/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
** |
|
Intel Corporation 2006 Stock Purchase Plan as
Amended and Restated Effective July 19, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
Statement Setting Forth the Computation of
Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)
of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS |
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Intel, Intel logo, Intel Atom, and Ultrabook are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries. |
|
* |
|
Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. |
|
** |
|
Management contracts or compensation plans or arrangements in which directors or executive
officers are eligible to participate. |
60
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEL CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: August 8, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Stacy J. Smith
|
|
|
|
Stacy J. Smith |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and
Principal Accounting Officer |
|
|
61