e10vq
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR
THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR
THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ___TO ___. |
Commission File No. 1-13071
Hanover Compressor Company
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
76-0625124 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
12001 North Houston Rosslyn, Houston, Texas
|
|
77086 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(281) 447-8787
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares of the Common Stock of the registrant outstanding as of April 26, 2006:
102,243,625 shares.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
HANOVER COMPRESSOR COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands of dollars, except for par value and share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
49,157 |
|
|
$ |
48,233 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $4,874 and $4,751 |
|
|
275,890 |
|
|
|
243,672 |
|
Inventory, net |
|
|
269,312 |
|
|
|
251,069 |
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts |
|
|
99,881 |
|
|
|
99,166 |
|
Prepaid taxes |
|
|
9,866 |
|
|
|
8,194 |
|
Current deferred income taxes |
|
|
16,729 |
|
|
|
13,842 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
2,020 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
46,136 |
|
|
|
38,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
770,956 |
|
|
|
704,385 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1,816,690 |
|
|
|
1,823,100 |
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
181,226 |
|
|
|
184,364 |
|
Intangible and other assets |
|
|
63,550 |
|
|
|
60,406 |
|
Investments in non-consolidated affiliates |
|
|
92,589 |
|
|
|
90,741 |
|
Assets held for sale, non-current |
|
|
5,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,930,496 |
|
|
$ |
2,862,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND COMMON STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
4,229 |
|
|
$ |
4,080 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
1,364 |
|
|
|
1,309 |
|
Accounts payable, trade |
|
|
98,412 |
|
|
|
92,980 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
122,901 |
|
|
|
128,805 |
|
Advance billings |
|
|
124,433 |
|
|
|
89,513 |
|
Liabilities held for sale |
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
Billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of costs and estimated earnings |
|
|
31,936 |
|
|
|
35,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
384,153 |
|
|
|
352,691 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,472,849 |
|
|
|
1,473,559 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
45,432 |
|
|
|
38,976 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
80,081 |
|
|
|
76,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,982,515 |
|
|
|
1,941,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
11,991 |
|
|
|
11,873 |
|
Common stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 102,455,513
and 102,392,918 shares issued, respectively |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,087,966 |
|
|
|
1,097,766 |
|
Deferred
employee compensation restricted stock grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,249 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
15,561 |
|
|
|
15,214 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(163,669 |
) |
|
|
(186,088 |
) |
Treasury stock303,397 and 366,091 common shares, at cost, respectively |
|
|
(3,970 |
) |
|
|
(3,963 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stockholders equity |
|
|
935,990 |
|
|
|
909,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and common stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,930,496 |
|
|
$ |
2,862,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
HANOVER COMPRESSOR COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues and other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. rentals |
|
$ |
91,643 |
|
|
$ |
87,154 |
|
International rentals |
|
|
62,506 |
|
|
|
53,915 |
|
Parts, service and used equipment |
|
|
49,271 |
|
|
|
33,437 |
|
Compressor and accessory fabrication |
|
|
54,691 |
|
|
|
32,524 |
|
Production and processing equipment fabrication |
|
|
78,619 |
|
|
|
89,571 |
|
Equity in income of non-consolidated affiliates |
|
|
5,848 |
|
|
|
4,574 |
|
Gain on sale
of business and other income |
|
|
30,219 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372,797 |
|
|
|
301,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. rentals |
|
|
38,091 |
|
|
|
34,076 |
|
International rentals |
|
|
21,332 |
|
|
|
17,502 |
|
Parts, service and used equipment |
|
|
41,062 |
|
|
|
25,060 |
|
Compressor and accessory fabrication |
|
|
46,693 |
|
|
|
29,617 |
|
Production and processing equipment fabrication |
|
|
68,963 |
|
|
|
79,125 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
48,055 |
|
|
|
42,158 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(1,497 |
) |
|
|
271 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
|
Debt extinguishment costs |
|
|
5,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
41,968 |
|
|
|
45,453 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
31,640 |
|
|
|
35,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342,209 |
|
|
|
309,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
30,588 |
|
|
|
(7,695 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
8,447 |
|
|
|
4,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
22,141 |
|
|
|
(12,236 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(271 |
) |
Gain from sales of discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting changes |
|
|
22,049 |
|
|
|
(12,464 |
) |
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax |
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
22,419 |
|
|
$ |
(12,464 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and equivalent shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
100,759 |
|
|
|
85,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
111,428 |
|
|
|
85,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
HANOVER COMPRESSOR COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands of dollars)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
22,419 |
|
|
$ |
(12,464 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
608 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
(2,962 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
22,766 |
|
|
$ |
(14,818 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
HANOVER COMPRESSOR COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands of dollars)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
22,419 |
|
|
$ |
(12,464 |
) |
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
41,968 |
|
|
|
45,453 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Bad debt expense |
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(698 |
) |
|
|
(375 |
) |
Equity in income of non-consolidated affiliates, net of dividends received |
|
|
(1,848 |
) |
|
|
7,675 |
|
Loss on derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
416 |
|
Net realized gain on trading securities |
|
|
(534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Zero coupon
subordinated notes accreted interest paid by refinancing |
|
|
(86,084 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on remeasurement of intercompany balances |
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
(3,518 |
) |
Gain on sale of business |
|
|
(28,368 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
2,003 |
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
Pay-in-kind
interest accreted on zero coupon subordinated notes |
|
|
6,282 |
|
|
|
5,526 |
|
Sales of (purchases of) trading securities, net |
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,105 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, excluding business combinations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and notes |
|
|
(31,155 |
) |
|
|
(3,753 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
(20,188 |
) |
|
|
(13,510 |
) |
Costs and estimated earnings versus billings on uncompleted contracts |
|
|
(3,421 |
) |
|
|
(7,429 |
) |
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
(9,363 |
) |
|
|
(2,528 |
) |
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
(3,614 |
) |
|
|
(18,279 |
) |
Advance billings |
|
|
34,605 |
|
|
|
3,972 |
|
Other |
|
|
(2,832 |
) |
|
|
1,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) continuing operations |
|
|
(77,416 |
) |
|
|
4,977 |
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
(77,508 |
) |
|
|
4,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(57,765 |
) |
|
|
(26,222 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
4,950 |
|
|
|
2,153 |
|
Proceeds from sale of business |
|
|
51,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in continuing operations |
|
|
(1,315 |
) |
|
|
(24,069 |
) |
Net cash provided by discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,315 |
) |
|
|
(24,019 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on revolving credit facilities |
|
|
110,500 |
|
|
|
85,500 |
|
Repayments on revolving credit facilities |
|
|
(29,000 |
) |
|
|
(8,500 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for debt issue costs |
|
|
(3,906 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds (repayments) of other debt, net |
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of
zero coupon subordinated notes principal |
|
|
(150,000 |
) |
|
|
(683 |
) |
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
548 |
|
Payments of 2000B equipment lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57,589 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing operations |
|
|
79,767 |
|
|
|
19,276 |
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
79,767 |
|
|
|
19,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(610 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
(489 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
48,233 |
|
|
|
38,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
49,157 |
|
|
$ |
37,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
HANOVER COMPRESSOR COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Hanover Compressor
Company (Hanover, we, us, our or the Company) included herein have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for
interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America are not required in these interim financial statements and have been condensed or omitted.
It is the opinion of our management that the information furnished includes all adjustments,
consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary to present fairly the
financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of Hanover for the periods indicated. The
financial statement information included herein should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2005. These interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full
year.
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted income
(loss) per common share is computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding
adjusted for the incremental common stock equivalents attributed to outstanding options and
warrants to purchase common stock, restricted stock, convertible senior notes and convertible
subordinated notes, unless their effect would be anti-dilutive.
The table below indicates the potential shares of common stock that were included in computing the
dilutive potential shares of common stock used in diluted income (loss) per common share (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstandingused in
basic income (loss) per common share |
|
|
100,759 |
|
|
|
85,691 |
|
Net dilutive potential common stock issuable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On exercise of options and vesting of restricted stock |
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
** |
|
On exercise of warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
** |
|
On conversion of convertible subordinated notes due 2029 |
|
|
** |
|
|
|
** |
|
On conversion of convertible senior notes due 2008 |
|
|
** |
|
|
|
** |
|
On conversion of convertible senior notes due 2014 |
|
|
9,583 |
|
|
|
** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares and dilutive potential
common shares used in dilutive income (loss) per
common share |
|
|
111,428 |
|
|
|
85,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** |
|
Excluded from diluted income (loss) per common share as the effect would have been anti-dilutive. |
Net income for the diluted earnings per share calculation for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 is
adjusted to add back interest expense and amortization of financing costs, net of tax, relating to
the Companys convertible senior notes due 2014 totaling $1.8 million.
The table below indicates the potential shares of common stock issuable which were excluded from
net dilutive potential shares of common stock issuable as their effect would be anti-dilutive (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net dilutive potential common shares issuable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On exercise of options and vesting of restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,977 |
|
On exercise of options-exercise price greater than average market value at end of period |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
771 |
|
On exercise of warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
On conversion of convertible subordinated notes due 2029 |
|
|
4,825 |
|
|
|
4,825 |
|
On conversion of convertible senior notes due 2008 |
|
|
4,370 |
|
|
|
4,370 |
|
On conversion of convertible senior notes due 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,329 |
|
|
|
22,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the prior periods financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the
2006 financial statement classification. These reclassifications have no impact on our consolidated
results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
7
2. STOCK OPTIONS AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS
123(R)). This standard addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in which an
enterprise receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the enterprise or
(b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprises equity instruments or that may
be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. SFAS 123(R) eliminates the ability to
account for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic value method under Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB No. 25), and
generally requires instead that such transactions be accounted for using a fair value based method.
SFAS 123(R) is effective as of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June
15, 2005. However, on April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that the
effective date of SFAS 123(R) would be changed to the first annual reporting period that begins
after June 15, 2005. We adopted the provisions of SFAS 123(R) on January 1, 2006.
Prior to
January 1, 2006, we measured compensation expense for our stock-based employee
compensation plans using the intrinsic value method, which follows the recognition and measurement
principles of APB No. 25, as permitted by FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123).
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123(R) using
the modified prospective transition method. Under that transition method, compensation cost
recognized in the first quarter of 2006 includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based
payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair
value, and (b) compensation cost for any share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1,
2006, based on the grant-date fair value. In accordance with the modified prospective transition
method, results for prior periods have not been restated. For the quarter ended March 31, 2006 and
2005, stock-based compensation expense of $2.0 million and $1.1 million, respectively, was
recognized and included in the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The total income tax benefit recognized for share-based compensation arrangements was
zero for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
On January 1, 2006, we recorded the cumulative effect of the change in accounting related to our
adoption of SFAS 123(R) of $0.4 million (net of tax of $0) which relates to the requirement to
estimate forfeitures on restricted stock awards.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), we recorded deferred compensation in equity when restricted
stock was granted. Due to the adoption of SFAS 123(R) on January 1, 2006, we reversed $13.2 million
from deferred compensation to additional paid-in-capital.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), we presented all tax benefits of deductions resulting from
the exercise of stock options as operating cash flows in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
SFAS 123(R) requires the cash flows from the tax benefits of tax deductions in excess of the
compensation cost recognized for those options (excess tax benefits) to be classified as financing
cash flows. There were no excess tax benefits classified as a financing cash inflow in the
accompanying Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows as of March 31, 2006 that would have been
classified as an operating cash inflow before we had adopted SFAS 123(R).
As of January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS 123(R) thereby
eliminating pro forma disclosure for periods following such adoption. For purposes of this pro
forma disclosure, the value of the options is estimated using a Black-Scholes option valuation
model and amortized to expense over the options vesting
periods. Had we used the fair value based accounting method for stock-based compensation expense described
by SFAS 123(R) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, our diluted net loss per common and equivalent
share for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 would have been as set forth in the table below ($ in
thousands, except per share data).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
Net loss, before stock-based compensation for employees, prior period |
|
$ |
(12,464 |
) |
Add: Stock-based compensation expense for employees previously
determined under intrinsic value method, net of tax effect |
|
|
1,055 |
|
Deduct: Stock-based compensation expense for employees determined
under the fair value based method, net of tax effect |
|
|
(1,696 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net loss, after effect of stock-based compensation for employees |
|
$ |
(13,105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
Basic and
Diluted as reported for prior period |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted after effect of stock-based compensation for employees |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
8
Incentive Plans
Hanover has employee stock incentive plans that provide for the granting of restricted stock and
options to purchase common shares. At March 31, 2006, approximately 1.3 million shares were
available for grant in future periods under our employee stock
incentive plans. The stock incentive plans provide for various long-term incentive awards, which include stock options,
performance shares and restricted stock awards. A description of these long-term stock-based
incentive awards and related activity within each is provided below.
Stock Options
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), and in accordance with APB No. 25, no stock-based
compensation cost was reflected in net income for grants of stock options to employees because we
grant stock options with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the stock on the date
of grant. Options granted typically vest over a three to four year period and are exercisable over
a ten-year period. For footnote disclosures under SFAS 123, the fair value of each option award was
estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model. Estimates of fair value are not intended to predict actual future events
or the value ultimately realized by employees who receive equity awards.
No stock options were granted after January 1, 2006 following the adoption of SFAS 123(R). For
future stock option grants, the fair value of each stock option award will be estimated using the
Black-Scholes valuation model and will follow the provisions of SFAS 123(R). The Company will use
historical data and other pertinent information to estimate the expected volatility for the term of
new options and the outstanding period of the option. The risk free interest rate will be based on
the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
Prior to
the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the fair value of an option was amortized to expense in pro-forma
footnote disclosures. Upon the adoption of SFAS 123(R), unvested options granted prior to the
date of adoption will be amortized to expense ratably over the remaining vesting period. For
options granted after the date of adoption, the fair value will be amortized to expense ratably
over the vesting period.
The following is a summary of stock option activity for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (in
thousands, except per share data and years):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price per Share |
|
|
Life
(in years) |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
3,021 |
|
|
$ |
11.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
$ |
9.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
$ |
11.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
2,780 |
|
|
$ |
11.92 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
18,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,907 |
|
|
$ |
11.83 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
12,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
The following table summarizes significant ranges of stock options outstanding and exercisable as
March 31, 2006 (in thousands, except per share data and years):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Range of exercise prices |
|
Shares |
|
|
Life
(in years) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
$5.01-7.50 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
5.70 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
$ |
5.70 |
|
$7.51-10.00 |
|
|
1,032 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
9.76 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
$ |
9.76 |
|
$10.01-12.50 |
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
$ |
11.75 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
$ |
11.71 |
|
$12.51-15.00 |
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
14.45 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
$ |
14.45 |
|
$15.01-17.50 |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
17.25 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
$ |
17.25 |
|
$17.51-20.00 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
18.95 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
$ |
18.95 |
|
$22.51-25.00 |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary
of the status of the Companys unvested stock options as of March 31, 2006 and
changes during the quarter ended March 31, 2006 is presented below (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
Unvested stock options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
914 |
|
|
$ |
5.31 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
5.45 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
$ |
5.27 |
|
Unvested at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
873 |
|
|
$ |
5.31 |
|
As of March 31, 2006, there was approximately $2.6 million of unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested options. Such cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period
of 1.6 years. Total compensation expense for stock options was $0.6 million for the quarter ended
March 31, 2006. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the quarter ended March 31, 2006 was $1.3
million.
Restricted Stock Awards
For grants
of restricted stock, we recognize compensation expense over the
vesting period equal to the fair value of the restricted stock at the date of
grant. No restricted stock awards were granted in the quarter ended March
31, 2006. The weighted-average fair value of restricted stock awards granted during the quarter
ended March 31, 2005 was $12.92.
For restricted stock that vests based on performance, we record an estimate of the compensation
expense to be expensed over three years related to these restricted stock grants. The compensation
expense recognized in our statements of operations is adjusted for changes in our estimate of the
number of performance stock that will vest. After the adoption of SFAS 123(R), performance stock awards will be expensed based on the original grant date value of
the awards. No performance stock awards were granted during the quarter ended March 31, 2006 or
2005.
10
A summary
of the status of the Companys unvested restricted stock awards (including performance
stock) as of March 31, 2006 and changes during the quarter ended March 31, 2006 are presented below
(shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
Unvested restricted stock awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
$ |
11.80 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
12.74 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
$ |
11.60 |
|
Change in expected vesting of performance awards |
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
11.39 |
|
Unvested at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
$ |
11.81 |
|
As of March 31, 2006, there was approximately $9.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested restricted stock awards (including performance shares). Such cost is expected
to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.7 years. Total compensation expense for
restricted stock awards was $1.4 million and $1.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 and
2005, respectively. The total fair value of restricted stock awards vested in the first quarter of 2006 was $0.1
million.
3. INVENTORY
Inventory, net of reserves, consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Parts and supplies |
|
$ |
139,850 |
|
|
$ |
135,310 |
|
Work in progress |
|
|
118,808 |
|
|
|
105,405 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
10,654 |
|
|
|
10,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
269,312 |
|
|
$ |
251,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 we had inventory reserves of approximately $12.0 million
and $11.8 million, respectively.
4. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Compression equipment, facilities and other rental assets |
|
$ |
2,457,864 |
|
|
$ |
2,441,119 |
|
Land and buildings |
|
|
87,861 |
|
|
|
87,604 |
|
Transportation and shop equipment |
|
|
74,236 |
|
|
|
77,507 |
|
Other |
|
|
53,042 |
|
|
|
53,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,673,003 |
|
|
|
2,660,054 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(856,313 |
) |
|
|
(836,954 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,816,690 |
|
|
$ |
1,823,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2006, the compression assets owned by entities that lease equipment to us but,
pursuant to our adoption of FIN 46, are included in property, plant and equipment in our
consolidated financial statements had a net book value of approximately $346.7 million, including
improvements made to these assets after the sale leaseback transactions.
11
5. INVESTMENTS IN NON-CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES
Investments in affiliates that are not controlled by Hanover but where we have the ability to
exercise significant influence over the operations are accounted for using the equity method. Our
share of net income or losses of these affiliates is reflected in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations as Equity in income of non-consolidated affiliates. Our primary equity method
investments are comprised of entities that own, operate, service and maintain compression and other
related facilities.
Our ownership interest and location of each equity method investee at March 31, 2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Location |
|
Type of Business |
PIGAP II |
|
30.0% |
|
Venezuela |
|
Gas Compression Plant |
El Furrial |
|
33.3% |
|
Venezuela |
|
Gas Compression Plant |
Simco/Harwat Consortium |
|
35.5% |
|
Venezuela |
|
Water Injection Plant |
Summarized earnings information for these entities for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
follows (on a 100% basis, in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
48,580 |
|
|
$ |
45,547 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
25,549 |
|
|
|
21,958 |
|
Net income |
|
|
19,209 |
|
|
|
14,886 |
|
12
6. DEBT
Short-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Bellelifactored receivables |
|
$ |
1,331 |
|
|
$ |
1,129 |
|
Bellelirevolving credit facility |
|
|
2,898 |
|
|
|
2,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
4,229 |
|
|
$ |
4,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bellelis factoring arrangements are typically short term in nature and bore interest at a weighted
average rate of 3.0% at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. Bellelis revolving
credit facilities bore interest at a weighted average rate of 4.0% and 3.9% at March 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005, respectively. These revolving credit facilities are callable during 2006.
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Bank credit facility due November 2010 |
|
$ |
129,500 |
|
|
$ |
48,000 |
|
4.75% convertible senior notes due 2008* |
|
|
192,000 |
|
|
|
192,000 |
|
4.75% convertible senior notes due 2014* |
|
|
143,750 |
|
|
|
143,750 |
|
8.625% senior notes due 2010** |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
7 1/2% senior notes due 2013** |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.0% senior notes due 2014** |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
2001A equipment lease notes, interest at 8.5%, due September 2008 |
|
|
133,000 |
|
|
|
133,000 |
|
2001B equipment lease notes, interest at 8.75%, due September 2011 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
Zero coupon subordinated notes, interest at 11.0%, due March 2007* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
229,803 |
|
7.25% convertible subordinated notes due 2029* |
|
|
86,250 |
|
|
|
86,250 |
|
Fair value adjustment fixed to floating interest rate swaps |
|
|
(12,369 |
) |
|
|
(9,686 |
) |
Other, interest at various rates, collateralized by equipment and
other assets, net of unamortized discount |
|
|
2,082 |
|
|
|
1,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,474,213 |
|
|
|
1,474,868 |
|
Lesscurrent maturities |
|
|
(1,364 |
) |
|
|
(1,309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,472,849 |
|
|
$ |
1,473,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Securities issued by Hanover (parent company). |
|
** |
|
Securities issued by Hanover (parent company) and guaranteed
by Hanover Compression Limited Partnership (HCLP). |
As of March 31, 2006, we had $129.5 million in outstanding borrowings under our bank credit
facility. Outstanding amounts under our bank credit facilities bore interest at a weighted average
rate of 6.6% and 6.1% at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. As of March 31, 2006,
we also had approximately $132.8 million in letters of credit outstanding under our bank credit
facility. Our bank credit facility permits us to incur indebtedness, subject to covenant
limitations, up to a $450 million credit limit, plus, in addition to certain other indebtedness, an
additional (a) $50 million in unsecured indebtedness, (b) $100 million of indebtedness of
international subsidiaries and (c) $35 million of secured purchase money indebtedness. Additional
borrowings of up to $187.7 million were available under that facility as of March 31, 2006.
As of March 31, 2006, we were in compliance with all covenants and other requirements set forth in
our bank credit facility, the indentures and agreements related to our compression equipment lease
obligations and the indentures and agreements relating to our other long-term debt. A default under
our bank credit facility or a default under certain of the various indentures and agreements would
in some situations trigger cross-default provisions under our bank
credit facility or the
indentures and agreements relating to certain of our other debt obligations. Such defaults would
have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial position and operations.
While all
of the agreements related to our long-term debt do not contain the
same financial covenants, the indentures and the agreements related to
our compression equipment lease obligations for our 2001A and 2001B sale leaseback transactions,
our 8.625% Senior Notes due 2010, our 7 1/2% Senior Notes due 2013 and our 9% Senior Notes due 2014
permit us at a minimum, (1) to incur indebtedness, at any time, of up to $400 million under our
bank credit facility, plus an additional $75 million in unsecured indebtedness, (2) to incur
additional indebtedness so long as, after incurring such indebtedness, our ratio of the sum of
consolidated net income
13
before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation expense, amortization of intangibles, certain
other non-cash charges and rental expense to total fixed charges (all as defined and adjusted by
the agreements governing such obligations), or our coverage ratio, is greater than 2.25 to 1.0,
and no default or event of default has occurred or would occur as a consequence of incurring such
additional indebtedness and the application of the proceeds thereof and (3) to incur certain
purchase money and similar obligations. The indentures and agreements for our 2001A and 2001B
compression equipment lease obligations, our 8.625% Senior Notes due 2010, our 7 1/2% Senior Notes
due 2013 and our 9% Senior Notes due 2014 define indebtedness to include the present value of our
rental obligations under sale leaseback transactions and under facilities similar to our
compression equipment operating leases. As of March 31, 2006, Hanovers coverage ratio exceeded
2.25 to 1.0, and therefore as of such date it would allow us to incur a limited amount of
indebtedness in addition to our bank credit facility and the additional $75 million in unsecured
indebtedness and certain other permitted indebtedness, including certain refinancing of
indebtedness allowed by such bank credit facility.
7 1/2% Senior Notes due 2013
In March 2006, we completed a public offering of $150 million aggregate principal amount of 71/2%
Senior Notes due 2013. We used the net proceeds from the offering of $146.6 million, together with
borrowings under our bank credit facility, to redeem our 11% Zero Coupon Subordinated Notes due March
31, 2007. In connection with the redemption, we expensed $5.9 million related to the call premium.
We paid approximately $242 million to redeem our 11% Zero Coupon
Subordinated Notes, including the call premium. The offering and sale
of the 2013 Senior Notes were made pursuant to an automatic shelf registration
statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We may redeem up to 35% of
the 2013 Senior Notes using the proceeds of certain equity offerings completed before April 15,
2009 at a redemption price of 107.5% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to
the redemption date. In addition, we may redeem some or all of the 2013 Senior Notes at any time on
or after April 15, 2010 at certain redemption prices together with accrued interest, if any, to the
date of redemption.
The 2013 Senior Notes are our general unsecured senior obligations and rank equally in right of
payment with all of our other senior debt. The 2013 Senior Notes are effectively subordinated to
all existing and future liabilities of our subsidiaries that do not
guarantee the 2013 Senior Notes. The
2013 Senior Notes are guaranteed on a senior subordinated basis by HCLP. The 2013 Senior Notes rank
equally in right of payment with our 2010 Senior Notes and 2014 Senior Notes and the guarantee of
the 2013 Senior Notes by HCLP ranks equally in right of payment with the guarantee of the 2010
Senior Notes and 2014 Senior Notes by HCLP. The indenture under which the 2013 Senior Notes were
issued contains various financial covenants which limit, among other things, our ability to incur
additional indebtedness or sell assets.
7. ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVES
We use derivative financial instruments to minimize the risks and/or costs associated with
financial activities by managing our exposure to interest rate fluctuations on a portion of our
debt and leasing obligations. Our primary objective is to reduce our overall cost of borrowing by
managing the fixed and floating interest rate mix of our debt portfolio. We do not use derivative
financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. Cash flow from hedges are
classified in our consolidated statements of cash flows under the same category as the cash flows
from the underlying assets, liabilities or anticipated transactions.
In March 2004, we entered into two interest rate swaps, which we designated as fair value hedges,
to hedge the risk of changes in fair value of our 8.625% Senior Notes due 2010 resulting from
changes in interest rates. These interest rate swaps, under which we receive fixed payments and
make floating payments, result in the conversion of the hedged obligation into floating rate debt.
For derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges, the gain or loss is recognized in
earnings in the period of change together with the gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to
the risk being hedged.
The following table summarizes, by individual hedge instrument, these interest rate swaps as of
March 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swap at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate to |
|
Notional |
|
March 31, |
Floating Rate to be Paid |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Received |
|
Amount |
|
2006 |
Six Month LIBOR +4.72% |
|
December 15, 2010 |
|
|
8.625 |
% |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
(6,306 |
) |
Six Month LIBOR +4.64% |
|
December 15, 2010 |
|
|
8.625 |
% |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
(6,063 |
) |
As of March 31, 2006, a total of approximately $2.0 million in accrued liabilities, $10.4 million
in long-term liabilities and a $12.4 million reduction of long-term debt was recorded with respect
to the fair value adjustment related to these two swaps. We estimate the effective floating rate,
which is determined in arrears pursuant to the terms of the swap, to be paid at the time of
settlement. As of March 31, 2006, we estimated that the effective rate for the six-month period
ending in June 2006 would be approximately 10.0%.
14
The counterparties to our interest rate swap agreements are major international financial
institutions. We monitor the credit quality of these financial institutions and do not expect
non-performance by any counterparty, although such financial institutions non-performance, if it
occurred, could have a material adverse effect on us.
8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Hanover has issued the following guarantees that are not recorded on our accompanying balance sheet
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undiscounted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments as of |
|
|
|
Term |
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
Indebtedness of non-consolidated affiliates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simco/Harwat Consortium (1) |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
7,571 |
|
El Furrial (1) |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
31,001 |
|
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance guarantees through letters of credit (2) |
|
|
2006-2010 |
|
|
|
122,872 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
2006-2007 |
|
|
|
20,350 |
|
Commercial letters of credit |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2,269 |
|
Bid bonds and performance bonds (2) |
|
|
2006-2011 |
|
|
|
124,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
308,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We have guaranteed the amount included above, which is a
percentage of the total debt of this non-consolidated affiliate
equal to our ownership percentage in such affiliate. |
|
(2) |
|
We have issued guarantees to third parties to ensure performance of
our obligations, some of which may be fulfilled by third parties. |
As part of
our acquisition of Production Operators Corporations
(POC) in 2001, Hanover may be
required to make a contingent payment to Schlumberger based on the realization of certain tax
benefits by Hanover through 2016. To date we have not realized any of such tax benefits or made any
payments to Schlumberger in connection with them.
We are substantially self-insured for workers compensation, employers liability, auto liability,
general liability, property damage/loss, and employee group health claims in view of the relatively
high per-incident deductibles we absorb under our insurance arrangements for these risks. Losses
are estimated and accrued based upon known facts, historical trends and industry averages.
We are involved in a project called the Cawthorne Channel Project in which we operate barge-mounted
gas compression and gas processing facilities stationed in a Nigerian coastal waterway as part of
the performance of a contract between an affiliate of The Royal/ Dutch Group (Shell) and Global
Gas and Refining Ltd., a Nigerian entity, (Global). We completed the building of the
required barge-mounted facilities and the project was declared commercial on November 15, 2005. The
contract runs for a ten-year period which commenced when the project was declared commercial,
subject to a purchase option that is exercisable for the remainder of the term of the contract.
Under the terms of a series of contracts between Global and Hanover, Shell, and several other
counterparties, respectively, Global is responsible for the overall project.
In the first quarter of 2006, violence and local unrest significantly increased in Nigeria. We were
notified on February 24, 2006 that as a result of the recent events, Global declared Force Majeure
with respect to the Cawthorne Channel Project. We have notified Global that we dispute their
declaration of Force Majeure and that we believe it does not relieve Globals obligations to make
monthly rental payments or monthly operations and maintenance fee payments to Hanover under the
contract. Due to the uncertainty about the
ultimate collection, we did not recognize approximately $1.2
million in revenues for March 2006 rents. We are in the process
of bringing the Cawthorne Channel Project back online. In light of this
notification by Global, as well as the political environment in Nigeria, Globals capitalization
level, inexperience with projects of a similar nature and lack of a successful track record with
respect to this project and other factors, there is no assurance that Global will comply with its
obligations under these contracts.
This project and our other projects in Nigeria are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties
associated with operating in Nigeria. Such risks include, among other things, political, social and
economic instability, civil uprisings, riots, terrorism,
15
kidnapping, the taking of property without fair compensation and governmental actions that may
restrict payments or the movement of funds or result in the deprivation of contract rights. Any of
these risks including risks arising from the recent increase in violence and local unrest could
adversely impact any of our operations in Nigeria, and could affect the timing and decrease the
amount of revenue we may realize from our investments in Nigeria. If Shell were to terminate its
contract with Global for any reason or if we were to terminate our involvement in the project, we would be required to find an alternative use
for the barge facility which could result in a write-down of our investment. At March 31, 2006, we
had an investment of approximately $69.7 million in projects in Nigeria, a substantial majority of
which related to the Cawthorne Channel Project (including $11.1 million in advances to and
receivables from Global).
In the ordinary course of business we are involved in various other pending or threatened legal
actions, including environmental matters. While management is unable to predict the ultimate
outcome of these actions, it believes that any ultimate liability arising from these actions will
not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
9. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity (SFAS 150). SFAS 150 changes the accounting for
certain financial instruments that, under previous guidance, issuers could account for as equity.
SFAS 150 requires that those instruments be classified as liabilities in statements of financial
position. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31,
2003, and otherwise is effective for interim periods beginning after June 15, 2004. On November 7,
2003, the FASB issued Staff Position 150-3 that delayed the effective date for certain types of
financial instruments. We do not believe the adoption of the guidance currently provided in SFAS
150 will have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations or cash flow. However, we
may be required to classify as debt approximately $11.9 million in sale leaseback obligations that,
as of March 31, 2006, were reported as Minority interest on our consolidated balance sheet
pursuant to FIN 46.
These minority interest obligations represent the equity of the entities that lease compression
equipment to us. In accordance with the provisions of our compression equipment lease obligations,
the equity certificate holders are entitled to quarterly or semi-annual yield payments on the
aggregate outstanding equity certificates. As of March 31, 2006, the yield rates on the outstanding
equity certificates ranged from 12.8% to 13.2%. Equity certificate holders may receive a return of
capital payment upon termination of the lease or our purchase of the leased compression equipment
after full payment of all debt obligations of the entities that lease compression equipment to us.
At December 31, 2005, the carrying value of the minority interest obligations approximated the fair
market value of assets that would be required to be transferred to redeem the minority interest
obligations.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs an Amendment of ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4 (SFAS 151). This standard provides clarification that abnormal amounts of idle
facility expense, freight, handling costs, and spoilage should be recognized as current-period
charges. Additionally, this standard requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the
costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The provisions of
this standard are effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June
15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS 151 did not have a material effect on our consolidated results of
operations, cash flows or financial position.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS
123(R)). This standard addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in which an
enterprise receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the enterprise or
(b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprises equity instruments or that may
be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. SFAS 123(R) eliminates the ability to
account for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic value method under Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and generally
requires instead that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method. SFAS
123(R) is effective as of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15,
2005. However, on April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that the
effective date of SFAS 123(R) would be changed to the first annual reporting period that begins
after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS 123(R) did not have a material impact on our financial
position or cash flows, but impacted our results of operations. See Note 2 for a discussion of the
impact of the adoption of SFAS 123(R).
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 153, Exchange of
Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29 (SFAS 153). SFAS 153 is based on the
principle that exchange of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair market value of
the assets exchanged. SFAS 153 eliminates the exception of nonmonetary exchanges of similar
productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that
do not have commercial substance. SFAS 153 is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges in fiscal
periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS 153 did not have a material impact on
our consolidated
16
results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154, Accounting
Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3 (SFAS
154). SFAS 154 requires retrospective application for reporting a change in accounting principle
in the absence of explicit transition requirements specific to newly adopted accounting principles,
unless impracticable. Corrections of errors will continue to be reported under SFAS 154 by
restating prior periods as of the beginning of the first period presented. SFAS 154 is effective
for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2005. The adoption of SFAS 154 did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of
operations, cash flows or financial position.
In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155, Accounting
for Certain Hybrid Instruments an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140 (SFAS 155).
SFAS 155 (a) permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an
embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation, (b) clarifies which interest-only
strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of FASB No. 133, (c)
establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify
interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain
an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation, (d) clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in
the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives, and (e) amends SFAS No. 140 to eliminate
the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative instrument that
pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial instrument. SFAS 155 is
effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entitys first
fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. We are currently evaluation the provisions of
SFAS 155 and do not believe that our adoption will have a material impact on our consolidated
results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Ted Collins, Jr., a Director of the Company, owns 100% of Azalea Partners, which owns approximately
15% of Energy Transfer Group, LLC (ETG). In the first quarter of 2006, we entered into an agreement
to be ETGs exclusive manufacturer of Dual Drive compressors and to provide marketing services for
ETG. For the quarter ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, we
recorded revenue of approximately $11.4 million and
$2.2 million, respectively, related to sales to ETG. As of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we had receivable balances due
from ETG of $5.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively. In addition, Hanover and ETG are co-owners
of a power generation facility in Venezuela. Under the agreement of co-ownership each party is
responsible for its obligations as a co-owner. In addition, Hanover is the designated manager of
the facility. As manager, Hanover received revenues related to the facility and distributed to ETG
its net share of the operating cash flow of $0.5 million, and $0.3 million for the quarter ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
11. REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
We manage our business segments primarily based upon the type of product or service provided. We
have six principal industry segments: U.S. Rentals; International Rentals; Parts, Service and Used
Equipment; Compressor and Accessory Fabrication; Production and Processing Belleli; and
Production and Processing Surface Equipment Fabrication. The U.S. and International Rentals
segments primarily provide natural gas compression and production and processing equipment rental
and maintenance services to meet specific customer requirements on Hanover-owned assets. The Parts,
Service and Used Equipment segment provides a full range of services to support the surface
production needs of customers from installation and normal maintenance and services to full
operation of a customers owned assets and surface equipment as well as sales of used equipment.
The Compressor and Accessory Fabrication Segment involves the design, fabrication and sale of
natural gas compression units and accessories to meet unique customer specifications. The
Production and Processing Surface Equipment Fabrication segment designs, fabricates and sells
equipment used in the production and treating of crude oil and natural gas. Production and
Processing Belleli provides engineering, procurement and construction services primarily related
to the manufacturing of heavy wall reactors for refineries and construction of desalinization
plants and tank farms. During 2005, we determined that Production and
Processing Belleli should become a
separate reportable segment from our Production and Processing Surface Equipment Fabrication
reportable segment due to differing long term economic characteristics. We have adjusted prior
periods to conform to the current presentation.
We evaluate the performance of our segments based on segment gross profit. Segment gross profit for
each segment includes direct revenues and operating expenses. Costs excluded from segment gross
profit include selling, general and administrative, depreciation and amortization, interest,
foreign currency translation, provision for cost of litigation settlement, goodwill impairment,
other expenses and income taxes. Amounts defined as Other income include equity in income of
non-consolidated affiliates, gain on sales of a business and corporate related items primarily
related to cash management activities. Revenues include sales to external customers. We do not
include intersegment sales when we evaluate the performance of our segments. Our chief executive
officer does not review asset information by segment.
17
The following tables present sales and other financial information by industry segment for the
three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part, |
|
Compressor |
|
Processing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
service and |
|
and |
|
Surface |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
International |
|
used |
|
accessory |
|
equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Rental |
|
rentals |
|
equipment |
|
fabrication |
|
fabrication |
|
Belleli |
|
income |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
March 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from
external customers |
|
$ |
91,643 |
|
|
$ |
62,506 |
|
|
$ |
49,271 |
|
|
$ |
54,691 |
|
|
$ |
36,348 |
|
|
$ |
42,271 |
|
|
$ |
36,067 |
|
|
$ |
372,797 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
53,552 |
|
|
|
41,174 |
|
|
|
8,209 |
|
|
|
7,998 |
|
|
|
5,884 |
|
|
|
3,772 |
|
|
|
36,067 |
|
|
|
156,656 |
|
March 31, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from
external
customers |
|
$ |
87,154 |
|
|
$ |
53,915 |
|
|
$ |
33,437 |
|
|
$ |
32,524 |
|
|
$ |
45,136 |
|
|
$ |
44,435 |
|
|
$ |
5,025 |
|
|
$ |
301,626 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
53,078 |
|
|
|
36,413 |
|
|
|
8,377 |
|
|
|
2,907 |
|
|
|
6,673 |
|
|
|
3,773 |
|
|
|
5,025 |
|
|
|
116,246 |
|
12. ASSETS HELD FOR SALE AND DISPOSITIONS
In February 2006, we sold our U.S. amine treating rental assets to Crosstex Energy Services L.P.
(Crosstex) for approximately $51.5 million and recorded a gain of $28.4 million. Our U.S. amine
treating rental assets had revenues of approximately $7.6 million in 2005. Because Hanover leased
back from Crosstex one of the facilities sold in this transaction, approximately $3.3 million of
additional gain has been deferred into future periods. We also entered into a three-year strategic
alliance with Crosstex. The disposal of these assets did not meet the criteria established for
recognition as discontinued operations under SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal
of Long-Lived Assets, (SFAS 144).
During the first quarter of 2006, Hanovers Board of Directors approved managements plan to
dispose of the assets used in our manufacturing plant in Canada, which was part of our production
and processing- surface equipment fabrication segment. These assets are being disposed of as part
of managements plan to improve overall operating efficiency in this line of business. The assets
to be disposed of are classified as assets held for sale as of
March 31, 2006. The planned disposal of
these assets does not meet the criteria established for recognition as discontinued operations under
SFAS 144.
During the fourth quarter of 2002, Hanovers Board of Directors approved managements plan to
dispose of our non-oilfield power generation projects, which were part of our U.S. rental business,
and certain used equipment businesses, which were part of our parts and service business. These
disposals meet the criteria established for recognition as discontinued operations under SFAS 144.
SFAS 144 specifically requires that such amounts must represent a component of a business comprised
of operations and cash flows that can be clearly distinguished, operationally and for financial
reporting purposes, from the rest of the entity. These businesses are reflected as discontinued
operations in our consolidated statements of operations.
Due to changes in market conditions, we have made valuation adjustments and the disposal plan for a
small piece of our original non-oilfield power generation business was not completed as of March
31, 2006. We are continuing to actively market these assets. As a result of our consolidation efforts during 2003,
we reclassified certain closed facilities to assets held for sale. The remaining assets are
expected to be sold within the next three to six months and the assets and liabilities are
reflected as held-for-sale on our condensed consolidated balance sheet.
18
Summary of operating results of the discontinued operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues and other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. rentals |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. rentals |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(271 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(139 |
) |
|
$ |
(271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary balance sheet data for assets held for sale as of March 31, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
& Processing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oilfield |
|
|
Surface |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power |
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generation |
|
|
Fabrication |
|
|
Total |
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
2,020 |
|
|
$ |
1,965 |
|
|
$ |
3,985 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,485 |
|
|
|
5,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
2,020 |
|
|
|
7,450 |
|
|
|
9,470 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities held for sale |
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets held for sale |
|
$ |
1,142 |
|
|
$ |
7,450 |
|
|
$ |
8,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary balance sheet data for assets held for sale as of December 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
& Processing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oilfield |
|
|
Surface |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power |
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generation |
|
|
Fabrication |
|
|
Total |
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
2,020 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,020 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
2,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,020 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities held for sale |
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets held for sale |
|
$ |
1,142 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
13. INCOME TAXES
During the first quarter 2006, we recorded a net tax provision of $8.4 million compared to $4.5
million for the first quarter 2005. Our effective tax rate for the first quarter 2006 was 28%,
compared to (59)% for the first quarter 2005. The change in the effective tax rate was primarily
due to our current U.S. tax position and the change in the weight of
our U.S. income (loss), including the gain on the sale of our U.S. amine
treating business that was recorded in the first quarter of 2006,
compared to total income (loss).
As a
result of prior operating losses, we are in a net deferred tax asset position for U.S.
income tax purposes. Due to our cumulative U.S. tax losses, we cannot reach the conclusion that it is
more likely than not that certain of our U.S. deferred
tax assets will be realized in the future and we have recorded a valuation allowance
on our net U.S. deferred tax asset position.
We will be required to record additional valuation allowances if our U.S. deferred tax asset
position is increased and the more likely than not criteria of SFAS 109 is not met. In addition,
we have recorded valuation allowances for certain international jurisdictions. If we are required
to record additional valuation allowances in the United States or any other jurisdictions, our
effective tax rate will be impacted, perhaps substantially, compared to the statutory rate.
20
Item
2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain matters discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements
intended to qualify for the safe harbors from liability established by the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
These forward-looking statements can generally be identified as such because the context of the
statement will include words such as we believe, anticipate, expect, estimate or words of
similar import. Similarly, statements that describe our future plans, objectives or goals or future
revenues or other financial metrics are also forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking
statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to
differ materially from those anticipated as of the date of this report. These risks and
uncertainties include:
|
|
|
our inability to renew our short-term leases of equipment with our customers so as to fully recoup our cost of the equipment; |
|
|
|
|
a prolonged substantial reduction in oil and natural gas prices, which could cause a decline in the demand for our compression and oil and natural gas production and
processing equipment; |
|
|
|
|
reduced profit margins or the loss of market share resulting from competition or the introduction of competing technologies by other companies; |
|
|
|
|
changes in economic or political conditions in the countries in which we do business, including civil uprisings, riots, terrorism, kidnappings, the taking of property
without fair compensation and legislative changes; |
|
|
|
|
changes in currency exchange rates; |
|
|
|
|
the inherent risks associated with our operations, such as equipment defects, malfunctions and natural disasters; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to implement certain business objectives, such as: |
|
|
|
international expansion including our ability to timely and cost-effectively
execute projects in new international operating environments, |
|
|
|
|
integrating acquired businesses, |
|
|
|
|
generating sufficient cash, |
|
|
|
|
accessing the capital markets, and |
|
|
|
|
refinancing existing or incurring additional indebtedness to fund our business; |
|
|
|
risks associated with any significant failure or malfunction of our enterprise resource planning system; |
|
|
|
|
governmental safety, health, environmental and other regulations, which could require us to make significant expenditures; and |
|
|
|
|
our inability to comply with covenants in our debt agreements and the decreased financial flexibility associated with our substantial debt. |
Other factors in addition to those described in this Form 10-Q could also affect our actual
results. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described above and those
described in this Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations in evaluating our forward-looking statements.
You should not unduly rely on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of
this Form 10-Q. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly revise any
forward-looking statement to reflect circumstances or events after the date of this Form 10-Q or to
reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. You should, however, review the factors and risks
we describe in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and the reports
we file from time to time with the SEC after the date of this Form 10-Q. All forward-looking
statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary
statement.
21
GENERAL
Hanover Compressor Company, together with its subsidiaries (we, us, our, Hanover, or the
Company), is a global market leader in the full service natural gas compression business and is
also a leading provider of service, fabrication and equipment for oil and natural gas production,
processing and transportation applications. We sell and rent this equipment and provide complete
operation and maintenance services, including run-time guarantees, for both customer-owned
equipment and our fleet of rental equipment. Hanover was founded as a Delaware corporation in 1990,
and has been a public company since 1997. Our customers include both major and independent oil and
gas producers and distributors as well as national oil and gas companies in the countries in which
we operate. Our maintenance business, together with our parts and service business, provides
solutions to customers that own their own compression and surface production and processing
equipment, but want to outsource their operations. We also fabricate compressor and oil and gas
production and processing equipment and provide gas processing and treating, and oilfield power
generation services, primarily to our U.S. and international customers as a complement to our
compression services. In addition, through our subsidiary, Belleli Energy S.r.l. (Belleli), we
provide engineering, procurement and construction services primarily related to the manufacturing
of heavy wall reactors for refineries and construction of desalinization plants and tank farms,
primarily for use in Europe and the Middle East.
Substantially all of our assets are owned and our operations are conducted by our wholly-owned
subsidiary, Hanover Compression Limited Partnership (HCLP).
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2006 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2005
Overview
Our
revenue and other income in the first quarter 2006 was
$372.8 million compared to first quarter of
2005 revenue and other income of $301.6 million. Net income for
the first quarter of 2006 was $22.4
million, or $0.22 per diluted share, compared with a net loss of $12.5 million, or $0.15 per
diluted share, in the first quarter of 2005.
In February 2006, we sold our U.S. amine treating rental assets to Crosstex Energy Services L.P.
(Crosstex) for approximately $51.5 million and recorded a gain of $28.4 million. Our U.S. amine
treating rental assets had revenues of approximately $7.6 million in 2005. Because Hanover leased
back from Crosstex one of the facilities sold in this transaction, approximately $3.3 million of
additional gain has been deferred into future periods. We also entered into a three-year strategic
alliance with Crosstex.
Total compression horsepower at March 31, 2006 was approximately 3,311,000, consisting of
approximately 2,423,000 horsepower in the United States and approximately 888,000 horsepower
internationally.
At March 31, 2006, Hanovers total third-party fabrication backlog was approximately $660.4 million
compared to approximately $373.1 million at December 31, 2005 and $270.5 million at March 31, 2005.
The compressor and accessory fabrication backlog was approximately $200.5 million at March 31,
2006, compared to approximately $85.4 million at December 31, 2005, and $63.9 million at March 31,
2005. The backlog for production and processing equipment fabrication was approximately $459.9
million at March 31, 2006 compared to approximately $287.7 million at December 31, 2005, and $206.6
million at March 31, 2005.
Industry Conditions
The North American rig count increased by 26% to 2,171 at March 31, 2006 from 1,726 at March 31,
2005, and the twelve-month rolling average North American rig count increased by 21% to 1,934 at
March 31, 2006 from 1,597 at March 31, 2005. In addition, the twelve-month rolling average New York
Mercantile Exchange wellhead natural gas price increased to $9.29 per MMBtu at March 31, 2006 from
$6.28 per MMBtu at March 31, 2005. Despite the increase in natural gas prices and the recent
increase in the rig count, U.S. natural gas production levels have not significantly changed.
Recently, we have not experienced any significant growth in U.S. rentals of equipment, which we
believe is primarily the result of (i) the lack of immediate availability of compression equipment
in the configuration currently in demand by our customers, (ii) increases in purchases of
compression equipment by oil and gas companies that have available capital and (iii) the lack of a
significant increase in U.S. natural gas production levels. However, improved market conditions
have led to improved pricing and demand for equipment in the U.S. market.
Tax Position
As a
result of prior operating losses, we are in a net deferred tax asset position for U.S.
income tax purposes. Due to our cumulative U.S. losses, we cannot reach the conclusion that it is
more likely than not that certain of our U.S. deferred tax assets will be realized in the future.
We will be required to record additional valuation allowances if our U.S. deferred
22
tax asset position is increased and the more likely than not criteria of SFAS 109 is not met. In
addition, we have recorded valuation allowances for certain international jurisdictions. If we are
required to record additional valuation allowances in the United States or any other jurisdictions,
our effective tax rate will be impacted, perhaps substantially, compared to the statutory rate.
Summary of Business Line Results
U.S. Rentals
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
91,643 |
|
|
$ |
87,154 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Operating expense |
|
|
38,091 |
|
|
|
34,076 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
53,552 |
|
|
$ |
53,078 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
U.S. rental revenue increased during the quarter ended March 31, 2006, compared to the quarter
ended March 31, 2005, due primarily to improvement in market conditions that has led to an
improvement in pricing. Gross margin for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 decreased compared to
quarter ended March 31, 2005, primarily due to price increases that were partially offset by
expenses of approximately $1.4 million related to our program to refurbish approximately 200,000
horsepower of idle U.S. compression equipment and the impact of
recording increased incentive compensation
expenses of approximately $0.7 million related to the adoption of SFAS 123(R).
International Rentals
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
62,506 |
|
|
$ |
53,915 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Operating expense |
|
|
21,332 |
|
|
|
17,502 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
41,174 |
|
|
$ |
36,413 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
During the first quarter of 2006, international rental revenue and gross profit increased, compared
to the first quarter of 2005, primarily due to increased rental activity in Venezuela, Mexico and
Nigeria. Gross margin decreased primarily due to increased labor costs in Argentina and the
interruption of operations in Nigeria. In the first quarter of 2006, violence and local unrest
significantly increased in Nigeria. Because of these events, we are negotiating with our customer
regarding the requirement to pay rent during this period and therefore did not recognize approximately $1.2
million in revenues from March 2006 rents.
Parts, Service and Used Equipment
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
49,271 |
|
|
$ |
33,437 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
Operating expense |
|
|
41,062 |
|
|
|
25,060 |
|
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
8,209 |
|
|
$ |
8,377 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Gross margin |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
(8 |
)% |
Parts, service and used equipment revenue for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 were higher than the
quarter ended March 31, 2005 primarily due to an increase in parts and service revenues in the U.S.
Gross profit and gross margin were lower in the first quarter of 2006 primarily due to reduced
margins on installations sales. Parts, service and used equipment revenue includes two business
components: (1) parts and service and (2) used rental equipment and installation sales. For the
quarter ended March 31, 2006, parts and service revenue was $42.9 million with a gross margin of
26%, compared to $31.2 million and 26%, respectively, for the quarter ended March 31, 2005. Used
rental equipment and installation sales
23
revenue for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 was $6.4 million with a gross margin of (44%),
compared to $2.3 million with a 7% gross margin for the quarter ended March 31, 2005. The decrease
in margins on used rental equipment and installation sales revenue was primarily due to $3.0
million of cost overuns on installation jobs. Our used rental equipment and installation sales
revenue and gross margins vary significantly from period to period and are dependent on the
exercise of purchase options on rental equipment by customers and
timing of the start-up of new projects by
customers.
Compression and Accessory Fabrication
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
54,691 |
|
|
$ |
32,524 |
|
|
|
68 |
% |
Operating expense |
|
|
46,693 |
|
|
|
29,617 |
|
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
7,998 |
|
|
$ |
2,907 |
|
|
|
175 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
For the quarter ended March 31, 2006, compression and accessory fabrication revenue, gross profit
and gross margin increased primarily due to improved market
conditions that also led to improved pricing
and an improvement in operational efficiencies. As of March 31, 2006, we had compression
fabrication backlog of $200.5 million compared to $63.9 million at March 31, 2005.
Production and Processing Equipment Fabrication
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
78,619 |
|
|
$ |
89,571 |
|
|
|
(12 |
)% |
Operating expense |
|
|
68,963 |
|
|
|
79,125 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
9,656 |
|
|
$ |
10,446 |
|
|
|
(8 |
)% |
Gross margin |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Production and processing equipment fabrication revenue for the quarter ended March 31, 2006
decreased over the quarter ended March 31, 2005, primarily due to the timing of projects awarded.
The Company has increased its production and processing equipment backlog and expects to see
improvement in revenue during the future quarters. As of March 31, 2006, we had a production and
processing equipment fabrication backlog of $459.9 million compared to $206.6 million at March 31,
2005, including Bellelis backlog of $388.2 million and $133.3 million at March 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
Gain
on Sale of business and other income
Gain on sale of business and other income for the first quarter 2006 increased to $30.2 million, compared to $0.5 million in the
first quarter 2005. The increase was primarily due to a gain of $28.4 million on
the sale of our U.S. amine treating business in the first quarter of 2006.
Expenses
Selling,
general, and administrative expense (SG&A) for the
first quarter of 2006 was $48.1 million,
compared to $42.2 million in the first quarter of 2005. The increase in SG&A expense is primarily due
to increased compensation expenses, partially as a result of our
adoption of SFAS 123(R), and other costs associated with
the increase in business activity. As a
percentage of revenue, SG&A expense was 13% for the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to
14% for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
Depreciation and amortization expense for the first quarter 2006 decreased to $42.0 million,
compared to $45.5 million for the same period a year ago. First quarter 2006 depreciation and
amortization expense decreased primarily due to reduced amortization of deferred financing costs,
reduced net property, plant and equipment depreciation due to
dispositions and reduced amortization related
to installation costs that were fully amortized.
Debt
extinguishment costs of $5.9 million relate to the call premium
to repay our 11% Zero Coupon
Subordinated Notes due March 31, 2007 in the first quarter of 2006.
The
decrease in our interest expense during the
quarter ended March 31, 2006 compared to the quarter ended March 31,
2005, was primarily due to debt repayments since March 31, 2005.
24
Foreign currency translation for the first quarter 2006 was a gain of $1.5 million, compared to a
loss of $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. The increase in foreign exchange
gain is primarily due to the strengthening of the Euro against
the U.S. Dollar for the first quarter ended March 31, 2006 as compared
to the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar against the Euro for the quarter ended March 31, 2005. During the three months
ended March 31, 2005, we recorded the impact of the change in the
fixed exchange rate made by the Venezuelan government.
The following table summarizes the exchange gains and losses we recorded for assets exposed to
currency translation (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Argentina |
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
(396 |
) |
Italy |
|
|
(1,118 |
) |
|
|
3,195 |
|
Venezuela |
|
|
(280 |
) |
|
|
(3,009 |
) |
All other countries |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange (gain) loss |
|
$ |
(1,497 |
) |
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impact
of foreign exchange on our statements of operations will depend
on the amount of our net
asset and liability positions exposed to currency fluctuations in future periods.
Income Taxes
During the first quarter 2006, we recorded a net tax provision of $8.4 million compared to $4.5
million for the first quarter 2005. Our effective tax rate for the first quarter 2006 was 28%,
compared to (59)% for the first quarter 2005. The change in the effective tax rate was primarily
due to our current U.S. tax position and the change in the weight of
our U.S. income (loss), including the gain on the sale of our U.S. amine treating business
that was recorded in the first quarter of 2006, compared to total
income (loss).
As a
result of prior operating losses, we are in a net deferred tax asset position for U.S.
income tax purposes. Due to our cumulative U.S. tax losses, we cannot reach the conclusion that it
is more likely than not that certain of our U.S. deferred tax assets will be realized in the
future and we have recorded a valuation allowance on our net U.S. deferred tax asset position. We
will be required to record additional valuation allowances if our U.S. deferred tax asset position
is increased and the more likely than not criteria of SFAS 109 is not met. In addition, we have
provided valuation allowances for certain international jurisdictions. If we are required to record
additional valuation allowances in the United States or any other jurisdictions, our effective tax
rate will be impacted, perhaps substantially compared to the statutory rate.
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change, Net of Tax
On January 1, 2006, we recorded the cumulative effect of change in accounting related to our
adoption of SFAS 123(R) of $0.4 million (net of tax of $0) which relates to the requirement to
estimate forfeitures on restricted stock awards.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our unrestricted cash balance was $49.2 million at March 31, 2006 compared to $48.2 million at
December 31, 2005. Working capital increased to $386.8 million at March 31, 2006 from $351.7
million at December 31, 2005. The increase in working capital was primarily attributable to an
increase in accounts receivable and inventory, partially offset by an increase in advanced
billings.
25
Our cash flow from operating, investing and financing activities, as reflected in the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows, are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
(77,416 |
) |
|
$ |
4,977 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(1,315 |
) |
|
|
(24,069 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
79,767 |
|
|
|
19,276 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(610 |
) |
Net cash (used in) provided by discontinued operations |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
$ |
(489 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in cash provided by operating activities for the first quarter 2006 as compared to the
first quarter 2005 was primarily due to the payment of accreted
interest from August 31, 2001 to March 31, 2006 on our 11%
Zero Coupon Subordinated Notes. The accreted interest has previously
been included in the outstanding balance of our 11% Zero Coupon
Subordinated Notes.
The decrease in cash used in investing activities during the first quarter 2006 as compared to the
first quarter 2005 was primarily attributable to proceeds received from the sale of our amine
treating business in the first quarter 2006, which was partially offset by an increase in capital
expenditures during the first quarter 2006.
Cash
provided by financing activities increased for the quarter ended 2006 as compared to the
quarter ended 2005 primarily due to the use of our bank credit
facility for a portion of the redemption of our 11% Zero Coupon
Subordinated Notes including the payment of accreted interest.
We may carry out new customer projects through rental fleet additions and other related capital
expenditures. We generally invest funds necessary to make these rental fleet additions when our
idle equipment cannot economically fulfill a projects requirements and the new equipment
expenditure is matched with long-term contracts whose expected economic terms exceed our return on
capital targets. We currently plan to spend approximately $175 million to $225 million on net
capital expenditures during 2006 including (1) rental equipment fleet additions and (2)
approximately $60 million to $70 million on equipment maintenance capital. Projected maintenance
capital for 2006 includes the cost of our program to refurbish approximately 200,000 horsepower of
idle U.S. compression equipment. Subsequent to December 31, 2005, there have been no other
significant changes to our obligations to make future payments under existing contracts.
We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since our formation and do not anticipate
paying such dividends in the foreseeable future. The Board of Directors anticipates that all cash
flow generated from operations in the foreseeable future will be retained and used to pay down debt
or develop and expand our business. Any future determinations to pay cash dividends on our common
stock will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent upon our results of
operations and financial condition, credit and loan agreements in effect at that time and other
factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors. Our bank credit facility, with JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A. as agent, prohibits us (without the lenders prior approval) from declaring or paying
any dividend (other than dividends payable solely in our common stock or in options, warrants or
rights to purchase such common stock) on, or making similar payments with respect to, our capital
stock.
Historically, we have funded our capital requirements with a combination of internally generated
cash flow, borrowings under a bank credit facility, sale leaseback transactions, raising additional
equity and issuing long-term debt.
As part of our business, we are a party to various financial guarantees, performance guarantees and
other contractual commitments to extend guarantees of credit and other assistance to various
subsidiaries, investees and other third parties. To varying degrees, these guarantees involve
elements of performance and credit risk, which are not included on our consolidated balance sheet.
The possibility of our having to honor our contingencies is largely dependent upon future
operations of various subsidiaries, investees and other third parties, or the occurrence of certain
future events. We would record a reserve for these guarantees if events occurred that required that
one be established.
In
March 2006, we completed a public offering of $150 million aggregate principal amount of 71/2%
Senior Notes due 2013. We used the net proceeds from the offering of $146.6 million, together with
borrowings under our bank credit facility, to redeem our 11% Zero Coupon Subordinated Notes due March
31, 2007. In connection with the redemption, we expensed
$5.9 million related to call premium. We paid approximately $242
million to redeem our 11% Zero Coupon Subordinated Notes, including
the call premium. The
offering and sale of the Senior Notes were made pursuant to an automatic shelf registration
statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We may redeem up to 35% of
the 2013 Senior Notes using the proceeds of certain equity offerings completed before April 15,
2009 at a redemption price of 107.5% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to
the redemption date. In addition, we may redeem some or all of the 2013 Senior Notes at any time on
or after April 15, 2010 at certain redemption prices
26
together with accrued interest, if any, to the date of redemption.
Our bank credit facility provides for a $450 million revolving credit in which U.S.
dollar-denominated advances bear interest at our option, at (a) the greater of the Administrative
Agents prime rate or the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50% (ABR), or (b) the eurodollar
rate (LIBOR), in each case plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.375% to 1.5%, with respect to
ABR loans, and 1.375% to 2.5%, with respect to LIBOR loans, in each case depending on our
consolidated leverage ratio. Euro-denominated advances bear interest at the eurocurrency rate, plus
an applicable margin ranging from 1.375% to 2.5%, depending on our consolidated leverage ratio. A
commitment fee ranging from 0.375% to 0.5%, depending on our consolidated leverage ratio, times the
average daily amount of the available commitment under the bank credit facility is payable
quarterly to the lenders participating in the bank credit facility.
As of March 31, 2006, we were in compliance with all covenants and other requirements set forth in
our bank credit facility, the indentures and agreements related to our compression equipment lease
obligations and the indentures and agreements relating to our other long-term debt. While there is
no assurance, we believe based on our current projections for 2006 that we will be in compliance
with the financial covenants in these agreements. A default under our bank credit facility or a
default under certain of the various indentures and agreements would in some situations trigger
cross-default provisions under our bank credit facilities or the indentures and agreements relating
to certain of our other debt obligations. Such defaults would have a material adverse effect on our
liquidity, financial position and operations.
As of March 31, 2006, we had $129.5 million of outstanding borrowings and $132.8 million of
outstanding letters of credit under our bank credit facility, resulting in $187.7 million of
additional capacity under such bank credit facility at March 31,
2006. We expect that our bank credit facility and cash flow from operations will provide us adequate
capital resources to fund our estimated level of capital expenditures for the short term. Our new
bank credit facility permits us to incur indebtedness, subject to covenant limitations, up to a
$450 million credit limit, plus, in addition to certain other indebtedness, an additional (a) $50
million in unsecured indebtedness, (b) $100 million of indebtedness of international subsidiaries
and (c) $35 million of secured purchase money indebtedness.
While all
of the agreements related to our long-term debt do not contain the
same financial covenants, the indentures and the agreements related to
our compression equipment lease obligations for our 2001A and 2001B sale leaseback transactions,
our 8.625% Senior Notes due 2010, our 7 1/2% Senior Notes due 2013 and our 9% Senior Notes due 2014
permit us at a minimum (1) to incur indebtedness, at any time, of up to $400 million under our bank
credit facility, plus an additional $75 million in unsecured indebtedness, (2) to incur additional
indebtedness, including further secured debt under our bank credit facility, so long as, after
incurring such indebtedness, our ratio of the sum of consolidated net income before interest
expense, income taxes, depreciation expense, amortization of intangibles, certain other non-cash
charges and rental expense to total fixed charges (all as defined and adjusted by the agreements
governing such obligations), or our coverage ratio, is greater than 2.25 to 1.0, and no default
or event of default has occurred or would occur as a consequence of incurring such additional
indebtedness and the application of the proceeds thereof and (3) to incur certain purchase money
and similar obligations. The indentures and agreements for our 2001A and 2001B compression
equipment lease obligations, our 8.625% Senior Notes due 2010, our 7 1/2% Senior Notes due 2013 and
our 9% Senior Notes due 2014 define indebtedness to include the present value of our rental
obligations under sale leaseback transactions and under facilities similar to our compression
equipment operating leases. As of March 31, 2006, Hanovers coverage ratio exceeded 2.25 to 1.0
and therefore as of such date it would allow us to incur a limited amount of
indebtedness in addition to our bank credit facility and the additional $75 million in unsecured
indebtedness and certain other permitted indebtedness, including certain refinancing of
indebtedness allowed by such bank credit facility.
As of March 31, 2006, our credit ratings as assigned by Moodys Investors Service, Inc. (Moodys)
and Standard & Poors Ratings Services (Standard & Poors) were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard |
|
|
Moodys |
|
& Poors |
Outlook |
|
Positive |
|
Stable |
Senior implied rating |
|
B1 |
|
BB- |
Liquidity rating |
|
SGL-3 |
|
|
2001A equipment lease notes, interest at 8.5%, due September 2008 |
|
B2 |
|
B+ |
2001B equipment lease notes, interest at 8.8%, due September 2011 |
|
B2 |
|
B+ |
4.75% convertible senior notes due 2008 |
|
B3 |
|
B |
4.75% convertible senior notes due 2014 |
|
B3 |
|
B |
8.625% senior notes due 2010 |
|
B3 |
|
B |
9.0% senior notes due 2014 |
|
B3 |
|
B |
7 1/2% senior notes due 2013 |
|
B3 |
|
B |
7.25% convertible subordinated notes due 2029* |
|
Caa1 |
|
B- |
27
|
|
|
* |
|
Rating is on the Mandatorily Redeemable Convertible Preferred
Securities issued by Hanover Compressor Capital Trust, a trust that we
sponsored. Prior to adoption of FIN 46 in 2003, these securities were
reported on our balance sheet as mandatorily redeemable convertible
preferred securities. Because we only have a limited ability to make
decisions about its activities and we are not the primary beneficiary
of the trust, the trust is a VIE under FIN 46. As such, the
Mandatorily Redeemable Convertible Preferred Securities issued by the
trust are no longer reported on our balance sheet. Instead, we now
report our subordinated notes payable to the trust as a debt. These
notes have previously been eliminated in our consolidated financial
statements. The changes related to our Mandatorily Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Securities for our balance sheet are
reclassifications and had no impact on our consolidated results of
operations or cash flow. |
We do not have any credit rating downgrade provisions in our debt agreements or the agreements
related to our compression equipment lease obligations that would accelerate their maturity dates.
However, a downgrade in our credit rating could materially and adversely affect our ability to
renew existing, or obtain access to new, credit facilities in the future and could increase the
cost of such facilities. Should this occur, we might seek alternative sources of funding. In
addition, our significant leverage puts us at greater risk of default under one or more of our
existing debt agreements if we experience an adverse change to our financial condition or results
of operations. Our ability to reduce our leverage depends upon market and economic conditions, as
well as our ability to execute liquidity-enhancing transactions such as sales of non-core assets or
our equity securities.
Derivative Financial Instruments. We use derivative financial instruments to minimize the risks
and/or costs associated with financial activities by managing our exposure to interest rate
fluctuations on a portion of our debt and leasing obligations. Our primary objective is to reduce
our overall cost of borrowing by managing the fixed and floating interest rate mix of our debt
portfolio. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative
purposes. The cash flow from hedges is classified in our consolidated statements of cash flows
under the same category as the cash flows from the underlying assets, liabilities or anticipated
transactions.
In March 2004, we entered into two interest rate swaps, which we designated as fair value hedges,
to hedge the risk of changes in fair value of our 8.625% Senior Notes due 2010 resulting from
changes in interest rates. These interest rate swaps, under which we receive fixed payments and
make floating payments, result in the conversion of the hedged obligation into floating rate debt.
For derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges, the gain or loss is recognized in
earnings in the period of change together with the gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to
the risk being hedged. The following table summarizes, by individual hedge instrument, these
interest rate swaps as of March 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swap at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate to be |
|
Notional |
|
March 31, |
Floating Rate to be Paid |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Received |
|
Amount |
|
2006 |
Six Month LIBOR +4.72% |
|
December 15, 2010 |
|
|
8.625 |
% |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
(6,306 |
) |
Six Month LIBOR +4.64% |
|
December 15, 2010 |
|
|
8.625 |
% |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
(6,063 |
) |
As of March 31, 2006, a total of approximately $2.0 million in accrued liabilities, $10.4 million
in long-term liabilities and a $12.4 million reduction of long-term debt was recorded with respect
to the fair value adjustment related to these two swaps. We estimate the effective floating rate,
which is determined in arrears pursuant to the terms of the swap, to be paid at the time of
settlement. As of March 31, 2006, we estimated that the effective rate for the six-month period
ending in June 2006 would be approximately 10.0%.
The counterparties to our interest rate swap agreements are major international financial
institutions. We monitor the credit quality of these financial institutions and do not expect
non-performance by any counterparty, although such financial institutions non-performance, if it
occurred, could have a material adverse effect on us.
International Operations. We have significant operations that expose us to currency risk in
Argentina and Venezuela. As a result, adverse political conditions and fluctuations in currency
exchange rates could materially and adversely affect our business. To mitigate that risk, the
majority of our existing contracts provide that we receive payment in, or based on, U.S. dollars
rather than Argentine pesos and Venezuelan bolivars, thus reducing our exposure to fluctuations in
their value.
In February 2003, the Venezuelan government fixed the exchange rate to 1,600 bolivars for each U.S.
dollar. In February 2004 and March 2005, the Venezuelan government devalued the currency to 1,920
bolivars and 2,148 bolivars, respectively, for each U.S. dollar. The impact of the devaluation on
our results will depend upon the amount of our assets (primarily working capital) exposed to
currency fluctuation in Venezuela in future periods.
28
For the quarter ended March 31, 2006, our Argentine operations represented approximately 4% of our
revenue and 6% of our gross profit. For the quarter ended March 31, 2006, our Venezuelan operations
represented approximately 9% of our revenue and 15% of our gross profit. At March 31, 2006, we had
approximately $14.5 million and $24.9 million in accounts receivable related to our Argentine and
Venezuelan operations, respectively.
The economic situation in Argentina and Venezuela is subject to change. To the extent that the
situation deteriorates, exchange controls continue in place and the value of the peso and bolivar
against the dollar is reduced further, our results of operations in Argentina and Venezuela could
be materially and adversely affected which could result in reductions in our net income.
Foreign currency translation for the first quarter 2006 was a gain of $1.5 million, compared to a
loss of $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. The increase in foreign exchange
gain is primarily due to the strengthening of the Euro against
the U.S. Dollar for the first quarter ended March 31, 2006 as compared
to the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar against the Euro for the quarter ended March 31, 2005. During the three months
ended March 31, 2005, we recorded the impact of the change in the
fixed exchange rate made by the Venezuelan government.
The following table summarizes the exchange gains and losses we recorded for assets exposed to
currency translation (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Argentina |
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
(396 |
) |
Italy |
|
|
(1,118 |
) |
|
|
3,195 |
|
Venezuela |
|
|
(280 |
) |
|
|
(3,009 |
) |
All other countries |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange (gain) loss |
|
$ |
(1,497 |
) |
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impact
of foreign exchange on our statements of operations will depend on
the amount of our net
asset and liability positions exposed to currency fluctuations in future periods.
We are involved in a project called the Cawthorne Channel Project in which we operate barge-mounted
gas compression and gas processing facilities stationed in a Nigerian coastal waterway as part of
the performance of a contract between an affiliate of The Royal/ Dutch Group (Shell) and Global
Gas and Refining Ltd., a Nigerian entity, (Global). We completed the building of the
required barge-mounted facilities and the project was declared commercial on November 15, 2005. The
contract runs for a ten-year period which commenced when the project was declared commercial,
subject to a purchase option that is exercisable for the remainder of the term of the contract.
Under the terms of a series of contracts between Global and Hanover, Shell, and several other
counterparties, respectively, Global is responsible for the overall project.
In the first quarter of 2006, violence and local unrest significantly increased in Nigeria. We were
notified on February 24, 2006 that as a result of the recent events, Global declared Force Majeure
with respect to the Cawthorne Channel Project. We have notified Global that we dispute their
declaration of Force Majeure and that we believe it does not relieve Globals obligations to make
monthly rental payments or monthly operations and maintenance fee payments to Hanover under the
contract. Due to the uncertainty about the
ultimate collection, we did not recognize approximately $1.2
million in revenues for March 2006 rents. We are in the process
of bringing the Cawthorne Channel Project back online. In light of this
notification by Global, as well as the political environment in Nigeria, Globals capitalization
level, inexperience with projects of a similar nature and lack of a successful track record with
respect to this project and other factors, there is no assurance that Global will comply with its
obligations under these contracts.
This project and our other projects in Nigeria are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties
associated with operating in Nigeria. Such risks include, among other things, political, social and
economic instability, civil uprisings, riots, terrorism,
kidnapping, the taking of property without fair compensation and governmental actions that may
restrict payments or the movement of funds or result in the deprivation of contract rights. Any of
these risks including risks arising from the recent increase in violence and local unrest could
adversely impact any of our operations in Nigeria, and could affect the timing and decrease the
amount of revenue we may realize from our investments in Nigeria. If Shell were to terminate its
contract with Global for any reason or if we were to terminate our involvement in the project, we would be required to find an alternative use
for the barge facility which could result in a write-down of our investment. At March 31, 2006, we
had an investment of approximately $69.7 million in projects in Nigeria, a substantial majority of
which related to the Cawthorne Channel Project (including $11.1 million in advances to and
receivables from Global).
29
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity (SFAS 150). SFAS 150 changes the accounting for
certain financial instruments that, under previous guidance, issuers could account for as equity.
SFAS 150 requires that those instruments be classified as liabilities in statements of financial
position. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31,
2003, and otherwise is effective for interim periods beginning after June 15, 2004. On November 7,
2003, the FASB issued Staff Position 150-3 that delayed the effective date for certain types of
financial instruments. We do not believe the adoption of the guidance currently provided in SFAS
150 will have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations or cash flow. However, we
may be required to classify as debt approximately $11.9 million in sale leaseback obligations that,
as of March 31, 2006, were reported as Minority interest on our consolidated balance sheet
pursuant to FIN 46.
These minority interest obligations represent the equity of the entities that lease compression
equipment to us. In accordance with the provisions of our compression equipment lease obligations,
the equity certificate holders are entitled to quarterly or semi-annual yield payments on the
aggregate outstanding equity certificates. As of March 31, 2006, the yield rates on the outstanding
equity certificates ranged from 12.8% to 13.2%. Equity certificate holders may receive a return of
capital payment upon termination of the lease or our purchase of the leased compression equipment
after full payment of all debt obligations of the entities that lease compression equipment to us.
At December 31, 2005, the carrying value of the minority interest obligations approximated the fair
market value of assets that would be required to be transferred to redeem the minority interest
obligations.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs an Amendment of ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4 (SFAS 151). This standard provides clarification that abnormal amounts of idle
facility expense, freight, handling costs, and spoilage should be recognized as current-period
charges. Additionally, this standard requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the
costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The provisions of
this standard are effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June
15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS 151 did not have a material effect on our consolidated results of
operations, cash flows or financial position.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS
123(R)). This standard addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in which an
enterprise receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the enterprise or
(b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprises equity instruments or that may
be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. SFAS 123(R) eliminates the ability to
account for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic value method under Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and generally
requires instead that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method. SFAS
123(R) is effective as of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15,
2005. However, on April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that the
effective date of SFAS 123(R) would be changed to the first annual reporting period that begins
after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS 123(R) did not have a material impact on our financial
position or cash flows, but impacted our results of operations. See Note 2 for a discussion of the
impact of the adoption of SFAS 123(R).
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 153, Exchange of
Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29 (SFAS 153). SFAS 153 is based on the
principle that exchange of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair market value of
the assets exchanged. SFAS 153 eliminates the exception of nonmonetary exchanges of similar
productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that
do not have commercial substance. SFAS 153 is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges in fiscal
periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS 153 did not have a material impact on
our consolidated
results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154, Accounting
Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3 (SFAS
154). SFAS 154 requires retrospective application for reporting a change in accounting principle
in the absence of explicit transition requirements specific to newly adopted accounting principles,
unless impracticable. Corrections of errors will continue to be reported under SFAS 154 by
restating prior periods as of the beginning of the first period presented. SFAS 154 is effective
for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2005. The adoption of SFAS 154 did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of
operations, cash flows or financial position.
In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155, Accounting
for Certain Hybrid Instruments an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140 (SFAS 155).
SFAS 155 (a) permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an
embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation, (b) clarifies which interest-only
strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of FASB No. 133, (c)
establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify
interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain
an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation, (d) clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in
the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives, and (e) amends SFAS No. 140 to eliminate
the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative instrument that
pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial instrument. SFAS 155 is
effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entitys first
fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. We are currently evaluation the provisions of
SFAS 155 and do not believe that our adoption will have a material impact on our consolidated
results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
30
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
For quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk affecting Hanover, see Item 7A,
Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005. Hanovers exposure to market risk has not changed materially since December 31,
2005.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934) as of March 31, 2006. Based on the evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer believe that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that
material information was accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to assure that the information
has been properly recorded, processed, summarized and reported and to allow timely decisions
regarding disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our first quarter of
fiscal 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of business we are involved in various pending or threatened legal actions,
including environmental matters. While management is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of
these actions, it believes that any ultimate liability arising from these actions will not have a
material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in our risk factors that were previously disclosed in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Item 6: Exhibits
|
4.1 |
|
Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 31, 2006,
among Hanover Compressor Company, Hanover Compression Limited
Partnership and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K filed by
Hanover Compressor Company on March 31, 2006). |
|
|
4.2 |
|
Form of Note for the 7 1/2% Senior Notes due 2013 (included
in Exhibit 4.1). |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ** |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ** |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith. |
31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
HANOVER COMPRESSOR COMPANY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 3, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ JOHN E. JACKSON |
|
|
|
|
John E. Jackson
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 3, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ LEE E. BECKELMAN |
|
|
|
|
Lee E. Beckelman
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
32
EXHIBIT INDEX
4.1 |
|
Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 31, 2006,
among Hanover Compressor Company, Hanover Compression Limited
Partnership and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K filed by
Hanover Compressor Company on March 31, 2006). |
|
|
4.2 |
|
Form of Note for the 7 1/2% Senior Notes due 2013 (included
in Exhibit 4.1). |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ** |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ** |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith. |
33