def14a
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF
THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the
Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the
Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
o Preliminary
Proxy Statement
|
|
|
o Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
þ Definitive
Proxy Statement
|
o Definitive
Additional Materials
|
o Soliciting
Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12
|
PIPER JAFFRAY COMPANIES
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other
Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
þ |
No fee required.
|
|
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
|
|
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which
transaction applies:
|
|
|
(2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which
transaction applies:
|
|
|
(3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of
transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined):
|
|
|
(4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as
provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11( a)(2) and identify the
filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously.
Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
(2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
800 Nicollet Mall, Suite 800
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
612 303-6000
March 16, 2005
Dear Shareholders:
You are cordially invited to join us for our 2005 annual meeting
of shareholders, which will be held on Wednesday, April 27,
2005, at 3:30 p.m., Central Time, at Windows on Minnesota on the
50th Floor of the IDS Center, 80 South Eighth Street,
Minneapolis, Minnesota. For your convenience, a map showing the
location of the IDS Center is provided on the back of the
accompanying proxy statement. Holders of record of our common
stock as of March 2, 2005, are entitled to notice of and to
vote at the 2005 annual meeting.
The Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the proxy
statement that follow describe the business to be conducted at
the meeting. We also will report on matters of current interest
to our shareholders.
We hope you will be able to attend the meeting. However, even if
you plan to attend, please vote your shares promptly to ensure
they are represented at the meeting. You may submit your proxy
vote by Internet or telephone as described in the following
materials or by completing and signing the enclosed proxy card
and returning it in the envelope provided. If you decide to
attend the meeting and wish to change your proxy vote, you may
do so automatically by voting in person at the meeting.
If your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank, trust or
other nominee, you may be asked for proof of ownership to be
admitted to the meeting, as described under How can I
attend the meeting? on page 4 of the proxy statement.
We look forward to seeing you at the annual meeting.
|
|
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew S. Duff
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
800 Nicollet Mall, Suite 800
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
612 303-6000
|
|
|
|
|
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS |
|
Date and Time: |
|
Wednesday, April 27, 2005, at 3:30 p.m., Central Time |
|
Place: |
|
Windows on Minnesota
50th Floor, IDS Center
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402 |
|
Items of Business: |
|
1. The election of two directors, each for a three-year
term. |
|
|
|
2. The ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young
LLP as Piper Jaffray Companies independent auditor for the
year ending December 31, 2005. |
|
|
|
3. Any other business that may properly be considered at
the meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. |
|
Record Date: |
|
You may vote at the meeting if you were a shareholder of record
at the close of business on March 2, 2005. |
|
Voting by Proxy: |
|
Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, please
vote your shares by proxy to ensure they are represented at the
meeting. You may submit your proxy vote by Internet or
telephone, as described in the following materials, by no later
than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 26, 2005, or by
completing, signing and promptly returning the enclosed proxy
card by mail. We encourage you to vote by Internet or telephone
in order to reduce our mailing and handling expenses. If you
choose to submit your proxy by mail, we have enclosed an
envelope addressed to our transfer agent, Mellon Investor
Services, for which no postage is required if mailed in the
United States. |
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
James L. Chosy
|
|
Secretary |
March 16, 2005
PROXY STATEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
14 |
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
29 |
ii
PROXY STATEMENT
2005 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD APRIL 27, 2005
The Board of Directors of Piper Jaffray Companies is soliciting
proxies for use at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held
on April 27, 2005, and at any adjournment or postponement
of the meeting. This proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card
are first being mailed or given to shareholders on or about
March 16, 2005.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING
What is the purpose of the meeting?
At our annual meeting, shareholders will act upon the matters
outlined in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. These
include the election of directors and ratification of the
selection of our independent auditor. Also, management will
report on matters of current interest to our shareholders and
respond to questions from our shareholders.
Who is entitled to vote at the meeting?
The Board has set March 2, 2005, as the record date for the
annual meeting. If you were a shareholder of record at the close
of business on March 2, 2005, you are entitled to vote at
the meeting.
As of the record date, 20,679,957 shares of common stock were
issued and outstanding and, therefore, eligible to vote at the
meeting.
What are my voting rights?
Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share.
Therefore, a total of 20,679,957 votes are entitled to be cast
at the meeting. There is no cumulative voting.
How many shares must be present to hold the
meeting?
In accordance with our bylaws, shares equal to a majority of the
voting power of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled
to vote generally in the election of directors as of the record
date must be present at the meeting in order to hold the meeting
and conduct business. This is called a quorum. Shares are
counted as present at the meeting if:
|
|
|
|
|
you are present and vote in person at the meeting; or |
|
|
|
you have properly and timely submitted your proxy as described
below under How do I submit my proxy? |
What is a proxy?
It is your designation of another person to vote stock you own.
That other person is called a proxy. If you designate someone as
your proxy in a written document, that document also is called a
proxy or a proxy card. When you designate a proxy, you also may
direct the proxy how to vote your shares. Three executive
officers, including our chief executive officer, have been
designated as proxies for our 2005 annual meeting of
shareholders. These executive officers are Andrew S. Duff,
James L. Chosy and Sandra G. Sponem.
What is a proxy statement?
It is a document that we are required to give you, in accordance
with regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission, when we ask you to designate proxies to vote your
shares of Piper Jaffray Companies common stock at a meeting of
our shareholders. The proxy statement includes information
regarding the matters to be acted upon at the meeting and
certain other information required by regulations promulgated by
the Securities and Exchange Commission and rules of the New York
Stock Exchange.
What is the difference between a shareholder of record and
a street name holder?
If your shares are registered directly in your name, you are
considered the shareholder of record with respect to those
shares.
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a
bank, trust or other nominee, then the broker, bank, trust or
other nominee is considered to be the shareholder of record with
respect to those shares, while you are considered the beneficial
owner of those shares. In that case, your shares are said to be
held in street name. Street name holders generally
cannot vote their shares directly and must instead instruct the
broker, bank, trust or other nominee how to vote their shares
using the method described below under How do I submit my
proxy?
How do I submit my proxy?
If you are a shareholder of record, you can give a proxy to be
voted at the meeting in any of the following ways:
|
|
|
|
|
electronically, using the Internet; |
|
|
|
over the telephone by calling a toll-free number; or |
|
|
|
by completing, signing and mailing the enclosed proxy card. |
The Internet and telephone voting procedures have been set up
for your convenience. The procedures have been designed to
authenticate your identity, allow you to give voting
instructions, and confirm that those instructions have been
recorded properly. When you vote by Internet or telephone, you
reduce our mailing and handling expenses. If you are a
shareholder of record and you would like to submit your proxy by
Internet or telephone, please refer to the specific instructions
provided on the enclosed proxy card. If you wish to vote using a
paper format, please return your signed proxy card to us so that
we receive it before the annual meeting.
If you hold your shares in street name, you must vote your
shares in the manner prescribed by your broker, bank, trust or
other nominee. Your broker, bank, trust or other nominee has
enclosed or otherwise provided a voting instruction card for you
to use in directing the broker, bank, trust or other nominee how
to vote your shares. In many cases, the broker, bank, trust or
other nominee will permit you to submit your voting instructions
by Internet or telephone.
How do I vote if my shares are held in the Piper Jaffray
Companies Retirement Plan or the U.S. Bancorp 401(k) Savings
Plan?
If you hold any shares of Piper Jaffray common stock in the
Piper Jaffray Companies Retirement Plan or the U.S. Bancorp
401(k) Savings Plan, your completed proxy card or the submission
of your proxy by Internet or telephone will serve as voting
instructions to the respective plans trustee. However,
your voting instructions must be received at least five days
prior to the annual meeting in order to count. In accordance
with the terms of the Piper Jaffray Companies Retirement Plan
and the U.S. Bancorp 401(k) Savings Plan, the trustee of the
plan will vote all of the shares held in the plan in the same
proportion as the actual proxy votes submitted by plan
participants at least five days prior to the annual meeting.
2
What does it mean if I receive more than one set of proxy
materials or multiple control numbers?
If you receive more than one set of proxy materials or multiple
control numbers for use in submitting your proxy, it means that
you hold shares registered in more than one account. To ensure
that all of your shares are voted, sign and return each proxy
card or voting instruction card you receive or, if you submit
your proxy by Internet or telephone, vote once for each card or
control number you receive.
Can I vote my shares in person at the meeting?
If you are a shareholder of record, you may vote your shares in
person at the meeting by completing a ballot at the meeting.
Even if you currently plan to attend the meeting, we recommend
that you also submit your proxy as described above so that your
vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the
meeting. If you submit your vote by proxy and then decide to
vote in person at the annual meeting, the vote you submit at the
meeting will override your proxy vote.
If you are a street name holder, you may vote your shares in
person at the meeting only if you obtain and bring to the
meeting a signed letter or other proxy from your broker, bank,
trust or other nominee giving you the right to vote the shares
at the meeting.
If you are a participant in the Piper Jaffray Companies
Retirement Plan or the U.S. Bancorp 401(k) Savings Plan, you may
submit a proxy as described above, but you may not vote your
Piper Jaffray shares held in the Piper Jaffray Companies
Retirement Plan or in the U.S. Bancorp 401(k) Savings Plan in
person at the meeting.
How does the Board recommend that I vote?
The Board of Directors recommends a vote:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR both of the nominees for director; and |
|
|
|
FOR the ratification of the selection of Ernst &
Young LLP as Piper Jaffrays independent auditor for the
year ending December 31, 2005. |
What if I do not specify how I want my shares
voted?
If you submit a signed proxy card or submit your proxy by
Internet or telephone but do not specify how you want to vote
your shares, we will vote your shares:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR both of the nominees for director; and |
|
|
|
FOR the ratification of the selection of Ernst &
Young LLP as Piper Jaffrays independent auditor for the
year ending December 31, 2005. |
Our broker-dealer subsidiary, Piper Jaffray & Co., is a
member broker of the New York Stock Exchange. Under New York
Stock Exchange rules, a member broker who holds shares in street
name for customers generally may vote on certain routine items,
including the election of directors and the ratification of the
selection of an independent auditor, even if the broker has not
received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the
shares. However, because of our relationship with Piper
Jaffray & Co., the New York Stock Exchange prohibits
Piper Jaffray & Co. from exercising discretion when
voting Piper Jaffray shares held by it in street name for which
Piper Jaffray & Co. has received no voting
instructions. In this situation, Piper Jaffray & Co. is
entitled to vote these shares only in the same proportion as the
shares represented by the votes cast by all shareholders of
record with respect to each proposal.
3
Can I change my vote after submitting my proxy?
Yes. You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time
before your proxy is voted at the annual meeting, in any of the
following ways:
|
|
|
|
|
by submitting a later-dated proxy by Internet or telephone
before the deadline set forth on the enclosed proxy card; |
|
|
|
by submitting a later-dated proxy to the secretary of Piper
Jaffray Companies, which must be received by us before the time
of the annual meeting; |
|
|
|
by sending a written notice of revocation to the secretary of
Piper Jaffray Companies, which must be received by us before the
time of the annual meeting; or |
|
|
|
by voting in person at the meeting. |
What vote is required for the election of directors and
for ratification of the selection of the independent
auditor?
The two director nominees who receive the most votes cast at the
meeting in person or by proxy will be elected. The affirmative
vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
common stock present in person or represented by proxy and
entitled to vote at the annual meeting is required to ratify the
selection of our independent auditor.
How are votes counted?
You may either vote FOR or WITHHOLD
authority to vote for each nominee for the Board of Directors.
You may vote FOR, AGAINST or
ABSTAIN on the other proposal. If you properly
submit your proxy but withhold authority to vote for one or more
director nominees or abstain from voting on the proposal to
ratify the selection of our independent auditor, your shares
will be counted as present at the meeting for the purpose of
determining a quorum. Your shares also will be counted as
present at the meeting for the purpose of calculating the vote
on the particular matter with respect to which you abstained
from voting or withheld authority to vote.
If you withhold authority to vote for one or more of the
directors or you do not vote your shares on this matter (whether
by broker non-vote or otherwise), this will have no effect on
the outcome of the vote. If you abstain from voting on the
proposal to ratify the selection of our independent auditor,
your abstention has the same effect as a vote against that
proposal.
Will my vote be kept confidential?
Yes. We have procedures to ensure that, regardless of whether
shareholders vote by Internet, telephone, mail or in person,
|
|
|
|
|
all proxies, ballots and voting tabulations that identify
shareholders are kept permanently confidential, except as
disclosure may be required by federal or state law or expressly
permitted by a shareholder; and |
|
|
|
voting tabulations are performed by an independent third party. |
How can I attend the meeting?
All of our shareholders are invited to attend the annual
meeting. You may be asked to present valid picture
identification, such as a drivers license or passport,
before being admitted to the meeting. If you hold your shares in
street name, you also may be asked to present proof of ownership
to be admitted to the meeting. A recent brokerage statement or
letter from your broker, bank, trust or other nominee are
examples of proof of ownership.
4
To help us plan for the meeting, please let us know when you
submit your proxy whether you expect to attend the meeting, by
responding affirmatively when prompted during Internet or
telephone voting or by marking the attendance box on the proxy
card.
Who pays for the cost of proxy preparation and
solicitation?
Piper Jaffray pays for the cost of proxy preparation and
solicitation, including the reasonable charges and expenses of
brokerage firms, banks, trusts or other nominees for forwarding
proxy materials to street name holders. We are soliciting
proxies primarily by mail. In addition, our directors, officers
and regular employees may solicit proxies by telephone or
facsimile or personally. These individuals will receive no
additional compensation for their services other than their
regular compensation.
Can I receive future proxy statements and annual reports
electronically instead of receiving paper copies through the
mail?
Yes. If you are a shareholder of record, you may request and
consent to electronic delivery of future proxy statements and
annual reports by accessing the Web site www.melloninvestor.com
and accessing your account after clicking on Investor
ServiceDirectsm.
If you do not see a prompt regarding consent to electronic
delivery of materials, click on Consent Update under the Account
Management option and follow the instructions. If your shares
are held in street name, please contact your broker, bank, trust
or other nominee and ask about the availability of electronic
delivery.
ITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The number of directors currently serving on our Board of
Directors is seven. Our Board of Directors is divided into three
classes of approximately equal size. The members of each class
are elected to serve a three-year term with the term of office
for each class ending in consecutive years. At this years
annual meeting, the terms of our Class II directors will
expire. Michael R. Francis and Addison L. Piper, who currently
serve as Class II directors with terms expiring at the 2005
annual meeting, have been nominated for reelection to the Board
to serve until our 2008 annual meeting of shareholders or until
their successors are elected and qualified. Each of the nominees
has agreed to serve as a director if elected. The two nominees
for director receiving a plurality of the votes cast at the
meeting in person or by proxy will be elected. Proxies may not
be voted for more than two directors. If, for any reason, any
nominee becomes unable to serve before the election, the persons
named as proxies may vote your shares for a substitute nominee
selected by the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of
the two director nominees. Proxies will be voted FOR the
election of the two nominees unless otherwise specified.
The nominees for election as director and the directors whose
terms of office will continue after the meeting have provided
the following information about themselves.
CLASS II DIRECTORS NOMINEES FOR TERMS ENDING
IN 2008
MICHAEL R. FRANCIS: Age 42, director since
December 31, 2003. Since 2003, Mr. Francis has served
as executive vice president, marketing for Target Corporation.
Target Corporation operates Target-brand general merchandise
discount stores and an online business, Target.com.
Mr. Francis began his career with Marshall Fields
department stores in 1985 and has been with Target Corporation
since its acquisition of Marshall Fields in 1990. He
previously served Target Corporation as senior vice president,
marketing from 2001 to 2003 and as senior vice president,
marketing and visual presentation of the department store
division from 1995 to 2001. Prior to that, he held a variety of
positions within Target Corporations advertising division.
Mr. Francis also is a member of the board of directors of
Department 56, Inc.
5
ADDISON L. PIPER: Age 58, vice chairman since
December 31, 2003. Mr. Piper has worked for Piper
Jaffray since 1969, serving as assistant syndicate manager,
director of securities trading and director of sales and
marketing. He served as chief executive officer from 1983 to
2000 and as chairman from 1988 to 2003. Since 1998,
Mr. Piper also has had responsibility for our venture and
private capital fund activities. Mr. Piper also is a member
of the board of directors of Renaissance Learning Corporation.
CLASS III DIRECTORS TERMS ENDING IN 2006
B. KRISTINE JOHNSON: Age 53, director since
December 31, 2003. Since 2000, Ms. Johnson has been
president of Affinity Capital Management, a Minneapolis-based
venture capital firm that invests primarily in seed and
early-stage health care companies in the United States.
Ms. Johnson served as a consultant to Affinity Capital
Management in 1999. Prior to that, she was employed for
17 years at Medtronic, Inc., a manufacturer of cardiac
pacemakers, neurological and spinal devices and other medical
products, serving most recently as senior vice president and
chief administrative officer from 1998 to 1999. Her experience
at Medtronic also includes service as president of the vascular
business and president of the tachyarrhythmia management
business, among other roles. Ms. Johnson also is a member
of the board of directors of ADC Telecommunications, Inc.
RICHARD A. ZONA: Age 60, director since
December 31, 2003. Since 2000, Mr. Zona has been
chairman and chief executive officer of Zona Financial LLC, a
Minneapolis-based business that provides financial advisory
services, including strategic alternatives, capital planning and
mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Zona is the former vice
chairman, wholesale banking and wealth management of U.S.
Bancorp, a position he held from 1996 to 2000. From 1989 to
1996, Mr. Zona was chief financial officer of U.S.
Bancorps predecessor, First Bank System, Inc. Prior to
that, Mr. Zona spent 19 years with the accounting firm
of Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. Zona also serves on the
boards of directors of New Century Financial Corporation,
Polaris Industries, Inc. and Shopko Stores, Inc. as well as ING
Direct Bank FSB, a wholly owned subsidiary of ING.
CLASS I DIRECTORS TERMS ENDING IN 2007
ANDREW S. DUFF: Age 47, chairman since
December 31, 2003. Mr. Duff became chairman following
completion of our spin-off from U.S. Bancorp on
December 31, 2003. He also serves as our chief executive
officer, a position he attained in 2000. Mr. Duff served as
president of Piper Jaffray from 1996 through 2003. Prior to the
spin-off from U.S. Bancorp, Mr. Duff also was a vice
chairman of U.S. Bancorp from 1999 through 2003.
SAMUEL L. KAPLAN: Age 68, director since
December 31, 2003. Mr. Kaplan is a partner and
founding member of the law firm of Kaplan, Strangis and Kaplan,
P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, and has served as the firms
president continuously since the firm was founded in 1978.
Mr. Kaplan also is a member of the board of directors of
Vyyo Inc.
FRANK L. SIMS: Age 54, director since
December 31, 2003. Mr. Sims is corporate vice
president, transportation and product assurance for Cargill,
Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, a marketer and distributor of
agricultural and industrial products and services. Mr. Sims
joined Cargill in 1972 and served in various roles before
attaining his current position in 2001. Most recently, he was
president of Cargills North American Grain Division from
1998 to 2000. Mr. Sims also is a member of the boards of
directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and Tennant
Company.
INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
The Board of Directors conducts its business through meetings of
the Board and the following standing committees: Audit,
Compensation, and Nominating and Governance. Each of the
standing committees has adopted and operates under a written
charter, all of which are available on our Web
6
site at www.piperjaffray.com. Other corporate governance
documents available on our Web site include our Corporate
Governance Principles, Director Nominee Selection Policy,
Procedures for Contacting the Board of Directors, Code of Ethics
and Business Conduct, and Complaint Procedures Regarding
Accounting and Auditing Matters. All of these documents also are
available in print to any shareholder who requests them.
Director Independence
Under applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange, a
majority of the members of our Board of Directors must be
independent, and no director qualifies as independent unless the
Board of Directors affirmatively determines that the director
has no material relationship with Piper Jaffray. To assist the
Board with these independence determinations, the Board has
adopted categorical standards referred to as Director
Independence Standards, which are included as Appendix A to
this proxy statement. Under the Director Independence Standards,
a director will be deemed independent for purposes of service on
the Board if:
|
|
|
|
(1) |
the director does not have any relationship described in Rule
303A.02(b) of the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance
rules; |
|
|
(2) |
in the event the director has a relationship that is not of a
type described in the Director Independence Standards or that
exceeds the limits of the relationships described in the
Director Independence Standards, the Board determines in its
judgment, after broad consideration of all relevant facts and
circumstances, that the relationship is not material; and |
|
|
(3) |
the Board reviews all commercial, banking, consulting, legal,
accounting, charitable, familial and other relationships the
director has with Piper Jaffray that are not of a type described
in the Director Independence Standards and determines in its
judgment, after broad consideration of all relevant facts and
circumstances, that the relationship is not material. |
The Board has affirmatively determined, in accordance with our
Director Independence Standards, that each of our non-employee
directors (Michael R. Francis, B. Kristine Johnson,
Samuel L. Kaplan, Frank L. Sims and Richard A.
Zona) is independent as that term is defined in the
applicable New York Stock Exchange rules. None of the
non-employee directors has a relationship described in
Rule 303A.02(b) of the New York Stock Exchange rules, and
with the exception of one relationship between Piper Jaffray and
Ms. Johnson, every relationship between Piper Jaffray and
the non-employee directors is of a type described in the
Director Independence Standards and does not exceed the limits
set forth in the Director Independence Standards.
Ms. Johnsons brother, Paul V. Olson, is employed
by us as a financial advisor in the private client services
business of our broker-dealer subsidiary. The Board broadly
considered all the relevant facts and circumstances of this
relationship, including the fact that Mr. Olson is not an
executive officer of our company or of our broker-dealer
subsidiary and the Boards determination that in her role
as a director, Ms. Johnson exercises independent judgment
that is not unduly influenced by management. After this
analysis, the Board affirmatively determined in its judgment
that this relationship is not material and that Ms. Johnson
is independent.
Messrs. Duff and Piper cannot be considered independent
directors because of their employment as executive officers of
Piper Jaffray.
Meetings of the Independent Directors
At both the Board and committee levels, our independent
directors meet regularly in executive sessions in which our
employee directors (Messrs. Duff and Piper) and other
members of management do not participate. Mr. Kaplan,
chairperson of the Nominating and Governance Committee, serves
as the presiding director of executive sessions of the Board,
and the chairperson of each committee serves as the presiding
director at executive sessions of that committee.
7
Committees of the Board
|
|
|
|
Members: |
Richard A. Zona, Chairperson
B. Kristine Johnson
Frank L. Sims
|
The Audit Committees purpose is to oversee the integrity
of our financial statements, the independent auditors
qualifications and independence, the performance of our internal
audit function and independent auditor, and compliance with
legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee has sole
authority to retain and terminate the independent auditor and is
directly responsible for the compensation and oversight of the
work of the independent auditor. The Audit Committee meets with
management and the independent auditor to review and discuss the
annual audited and quarterly unaudited financial statements,
reviews the integrity of our accounting and financial reporting
processes and audits of our financial statements, and prepares
the Audit Committee Report included in the proxy statement in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The responsibilities of the Audit Committee
are more fully described in the Committees charter, which
is included as Appendix B to this proxy statement. The
Audit Committee met nine times during 2004.
The Board of Directors has determined that all members of the
Audit Committee are independent as that term is
defined in the applicable New York Stock Exchange rules and in
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that
all members are financially literate as required by rules of the
New York Stock Exchange. The Board of Directors also has
determined that all members of the Audit Committee have the
accounting or related financial expertise required by the
applicable New York Stock Exchange listing standards and that
Mr. Zona and Mr. Sims each is an audit committee
financial expert as defined by applicable regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition to his
service on our Audit Committee, Mr. Zona serves on the
audit committees of three other publicly traded companies (New
Century Financial Corporation, Polaris Industries, Inc. and
Shopko Stores, Inc.). Our Board of Directors has determined that
Mr. Zonas simultaneous service on these other audit
committees does not impair his ability to serve effectively on
our Audit Committee.
|
|
|
|
Members: |
Michael R. Francis, Chairperson
Frank L. Sims
Richard A. Zona
|
The Compensation Committee discharges the Boards
responsibilities relating to compensation of the executive
officers, oversees succession planning for the executive
officers jointly with the Nominating and Governance Committee
and ensures that our compensation and employee benefit programs
comply with our compensation and benefits philosophy. The
Committee reviews and evaluates our compensation philosophy,
goals and objectives, and it approves corporate goals related to
the compensation of the chief executive officer, evaluates the
chief executive officers performance and determines the
compensation of the chief executive officer based on this
evaluation. The Committee also reviews and approves compensation
and compensatory arrangements applicable to our other executive
officers and is responsible for recommending stock ownership
guidelines for the executive officers and directors, for
recommending the compensation and benefits to be provided to our
non-employee directors, for reviewing and recommending the
establishment of broad-based incentive compensation,
equity-based, retirement or other material employee benefit
plans, and for discharging any duties under the terms of these
plans. The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are
more fully described in the Committees charter. The
Compensation Committee met five times during 2004. The Board of
Directors has determined that all members of the Compensation
Committee are independent as that term is defined in
applicable New York Stock Exchange rules.
8
|
|
|
Nominating and Governance Committee |
|
|
|
|
Members: |
Samuel L. Kaplan, Chairperson
Michael R. Francis
B. Kristine Johnson
|
The Nominating and Governance Committee identifies and
recommends individuals qualified to become members of the Board
of Directors and recommends to the Board sound corporate
governance principles and practices for Piper Jaffray. In
particular, the Committee assesses the independence of all Board
members, identifies and evaluates candidates for nomination as
directors, responds to director nominations submitted by
shareholders, recommends the slate of director nominees for
election at the annual meeting of shareholders and candidates to
fill vacancies between annual meetings, recommends qualified
members of the Board for membership on committees, oversees the
director orientation and continuing education programs, reviews
the Boards committee structure, reviews and assesses the
adequacy of our Corporate Governance Principles, evaluates the
annual evaluation process for the executive officers, the Board
and Board committees, and oversees the succession planning
process for the executive officers jointly with the Compensation
Committee. The responsibilities of the Nominating and Governance
Committee are more fully described in the Committees
charter. The Nominating and Governance Committee met five times
during 2004. The Board of Directors has determined that all
members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are
independent as that term is defined in applicable
New York Stock Exchange rules.
Meeting Attendance
Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that our directors
are expected to attend meetings of the Board and of the
committees on which they serve, as well as our annual meeting of
shareholders. Our Board of Directors held eight meetings during
2004. Each of our directors attended at least 75% of the
meetings of the Board of Directors and the committees on which
he or she served during 2004. Attendance at our Board and
committee meetings during 2004 averaged 96.8% for incumbent
directors as a group, and all of our directors attended the 2004
annual meeting of shareholders.
Procedures for Contacting the Board of Directors
The Board has established a process for shareholders and other
interested parties to send written communications to the Board
or to individual directors. Such communications should be sent
by U.S. mail to the Office of the Secretary, Piper Jaffray
Companies, 800 Nicollet Mall, Suite 800, Minneapolis,
Minnesota 55402. Communications regarding accounting and
auditing matters will be handled in accordance with our
Complaint Procedures Regarding Accounting and Auditing Matters.
Other communications will be collected by the secretary of the
company and delivered, in the form received, to the presiding
director or, if so addressed, to a specified director. The
chairperson of the Nominating and Governance Committee serves as
the presiding director.
Procedures for Selecting and Nominating Director
Candidates
The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider director
candidates recommended by shareholders, and the Committee has
adopted a policy that contemplates shareholders recommending and
nominating director candidates. A shareholder who wishes to
recommend a director candidate to the Board for nomination by
the Board at the annual meeting of shareholders or for vacancies
of the Board that arise between shareholder meetings must timely
provide the Nominating and Governance Committee with sufficient
written documentation to permit a determination by the Board
whether such candidate meets the required and desired director
selection criteria set forth in our bylaws, our Corporate
Governance Principles and our Director Nominee Selection Policy
described below. Such documentation and the name of the director
candidate must be sent by U.S. mail to the Chairperson,
9
Nominating and Governance Committee, c/o the Office of the
Secretary, Piper Jaffray Companies, 800 Nicollet Mall,
Suite 800, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402.
Alternatively, shareholders may directly nominate a person for
election to our Board of Directors by complying with the
procedures set forth in Article II, Section 2.4 of our
bylaws, and with the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Under our bylaws, only persons nominated in
accordance with the procedures set forth in the bylaws will be
eligible to serve as directors. In order to nominate a candidate
for service as a director, you must be a shareholder of record
at the time you give the Board notice of your nomination, and
you must be entitled to vote for the election of directors at
the meeting at which your nominee will be considered. In
accordance with our bylaws, director nominations generally must
be made pursuant to notice delivered to or mailed and received
at our principal executive offices at the address above, not
later than the 90th day, nor earlier than the 120th day, prior
to the first anniversary of the prior years annual meeting
of shareholders. Your notice must set forth all information
relating to the nominee that is required to be disclosed in
solicitations of proxies for the election of directors in an
election contest, or is otherwise required, in each case
pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and Rule 14a-11 thereunder (including the
nominees written consent to being named in the proxy
statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected).
As required by our Corporate Governance Principles and our
Director Nominee Selection Policy, when evaluating the
appropriate characteristics of candidates for service as a
director, the Nominating and Governance Committee takes into
account many factors. At a minimum, director candidates must
demonstrate high standards of ethics, integrity and
professionalism, independence, sound judgment, community
leadership and meaningful experience in business, law or finance
or other appropriate endeavor. Candidates also must be committed
to representing the long-term interests of our shareholders. In
addition to these minimum qualifications, the Committee
considers other factors it deems appropriate based on the
current needs and desires of the Board, including specific
business and financial expertise currently desired on the Board,
experience as a director of a public company, geography, age,
gender and ethnic diversity. The Committee will reassess the
qualifications of a director, including the directors past
contributions to the Board and the directors attendance
and contributions at Board and committee meetings, prior to
recommending a director for reelection to another term.
Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors
Directors who are not Piper Jaffray employees receive an annual
cash retainer of $50,000 for service on our Board of Directors.
No separate meeting fees are paid. The chairperson of the Audit
Committee receives an additional annual cash retainer of $8,000.
The chairperson of each other standing committee receives an
additional annual cash retainer of $5,000.
In addition to the cash retainer, each non-employee director
receives a stock option with a fair market value of $20,000 on
the date of the directors initial election to the Board.
Non-employee directors who will continue their service on the
Board following an annual meeting of shareholders receive a
stock option valued at $50,000 on the date of the annual
meeting. In both cases, the number of shares underlying the
option is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model, and the option is exercisable immediately, has a 10-year
term and has an exercise price equal to the closing price of our
common stock on the date of grant. The options are granted under
our Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive
Plan. We plan to award directors who join our Board after the
first month of a calendar year with pro rata annual retainers
and equity awards based on the number of months in which they
serve as directors during the year.
Beginning with the 2005 calendar year, non-employee directors
are eligible to participate in the Piper Jaffray Companies
Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, which was
adopted by the Board in December 2004. The plan permits our
non-employee directors to defer all or a portion of the cash
fees payable to them for their service as a director of Piper
Jaffray for any
10
calendar year. Amounts deferred by a participating director are
credited to a recordkeeping account established for the director
and deemed invested in shares of our common stock as of the date
the deferred fees otherwise would have been paid to the
director. This deemed investment is measured in phantom stock,
and no shares of common stock are reserved, repurchased or
issued pursuant to the plan. The fair market value of all
phantom stock credited to a directors account will be paid
out to the director (or, in the event of the directors
death, to his or her beneficiary) in a single lump-sum cash
payment following the directors cessation of service as a
non-employee director. The amount paid out will be determined
based on the fair market value of the stock on the last day of
the year in which the directors service with us
terminates. Directors who elect to participate in the plan are
not required to pay income taxes on amounts deferred but will
instead pay income taxes on the amount of the lump-sum cash
payment paid to the director (or his or her beneficiary) at the
time of such payment. Our obligations under the plan are
unsecured general obligations to pay in the future the value of
the participants account pursuant to the terms of the plan.
Non-employee directors also may participate in our charitable
gift matching program, pursuant to which we will match an
employees or directors gifts to eligible
organizations dollar for dollar from a minimum of $50 up to an
aggregate maximum of $1,000 per year. In addition, our
non-employee directors are reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their service
on the Board and committees of the Board.
Employees of Piper Jaffray who also serve as directors receive
compensation for their services as employees, but they do not
receive any additional compensation for their service as
directors. No other compensation is paid to our Board members in
their capacity as directors. Non-employee directors do not
participate in our employee benefit plans.
Code of Ethics and Business Conduct
We have adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applicable
to all of our directors and employees, including our principal
executive officer, principal financial and accounting officer,
controller and other employees performing similar functions. A
copy of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available on
our Web site at www.piperjaffray.com and is available in
print to any shareholder who requests it.
We intend to post on our Web site any amendment to, or waiver
from, a provision of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct
that applies to our principal executive officer, principal
financial and accounting officer, controller and other persons
performing similar functions within five business days following
the date of such amendment or waiver.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Report of the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, which
consists entirely of independent directors, is responsible for
discharging the Boards responsibilities relating to
compensation of the companys executive officers,
overseeing the companys compensation plans and policies,
including administering the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and
Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan, and ensuring
that the companys compensation and benefits philosophy is
reflected in its compensation and benefits programs. The
Committees charter reflects these responsibilities.
The companys executive compensation program is designed to
attract and retain motivated individuals who will lead Piper
Jaffray to achieve long-term success, as measured by increasing
shareholder value. A substantial portion of each executive
officers total compensation is intended to be variable and
delivered on a pay-for-performance basis. Due to the intensely
competitive nature of
11
the securities industry, the executive compensation program
generally will provide compensation opportunities, contingent
upon performance, that are competitive with practices of other
similar organizations in our industry.
We are committed to utilizing the companys compensation
program to build an ownership culture among all of the
companys employees and to expand the breadth and depth of
employee ownership over time. We believe that employee ownership
directly aligns the interests of employees and shareholders and
will promote long-term shareholder value creation. This is
particularly true in a human capital business like Piper
Jaffray, where the performance of individual employees can have
a direct and meaningful effect on financial performance and on
the companys culture. This philosophy is reflected in our
compensation program for executive officers as well as for
employees generally.
|
|
|
Executive Officer Compensation Program |
In 2004, the Committee retained Watson Wyatt & Company,
a nationally recognized compensation consulting firm with
securities industry expertise, to provide the Committee with
analysis of industry practices and make recommendations to the
Committee regarding the structure of the compensation program
for the companys executive officers. The key components of
the executive compensation program are base salary, annual
incentive compensation and long-term incentive awards.
The purpose of base salary is to provide a set amount of cash
compensation for each executive officer that is not variable in
nature and is competitive with market practices. Base salaries
for the executive officers are reviewed annually by the
Compensation Committee. Adjustments are based on each executive
officers performance for the prior year, his or her
experience, expertise and position within the company, and
compensation levels for comparable positions at comparable
public companies and other companies in the securities industry
with whom the company competes, as reported in external
compensation sources. Consistent with industry practice, the
base salary for each of the companys executive officers
generally accounts for a relatively small portion of his or her
overall compensation.
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Compensation |
The annual incentive program is a key component of the
companys executive compensation strategy. The purpose of
the annual incentive program is to provide cash and equity
compensation that is variable based on the achievement of annual
performance goals. The program is administered by the
Compensation Committee under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended
and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan.
In March 2004, the Committee established the performance goals
for the 2004 annual incentive program. For 2004, each executive
officer was entitled to receive annual incentive compensation
based on the companys pre-tax operating income for the
year, as adjusted to eliminate certain compensation and benefits
expenses and certain other expenses, losses, income or gains
that are unusual in nature or infrequent in occurrence. The
specific amount paid to each executive officer was determined
based on his or her performance against individualized, weighted
performance goals relating to company-wide and business unit
operating performance and individual performance against a
personalized performance plan.
Consistent with our philosophy regarding employee ownership, the
executive officers annual incentive compensation for 2004
was paid out in a combination of cash and restricted stock, with
the restricted stock representing from 36% to 46% of the total
annual incentive payout, depending on the individuals
position. The restricted stock was granted under the 2003 Annual
and Long-Term Incentive Plan and will fully vest on
February 22, 2008.
12
For 2005, annual incentive awards for the chief executive
officer and other executive officers also will be based on the
companys pre-tax operating income, adjusted as described
above. The 2005 annual incentive award also will be paid out in
a combination of cash and equity, and the equity may include
both restricted stock and stock options.
|
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Awards |
Long-term incentives are intended to provide compensation
opportunities based on the creation of shareholder value and an
increase in the companys stock price. Both stock options
and restricted stock awards provide these opportunities. As
described above, the executive officers received awards of
restricted stock as partial payment of their 2004 annual
incentive compensation. The Committee also approved a stock
option grant to each executive officer effective on
February 22, 2005. The size of the stock option grant was
based on each executive officers past performance, future
potential, past equity grants, and his or her position within
the company. Like the restricted stock, the stock options were
granted under the 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan and
will fully vest on February 22, 2008.
Consistent with our compensation philosophy, the equity
component of each executive officers total incentive
compensation paid for 2004 represented from 40% to 50% of the
total incentive payout approved for each executive officer,
depending on the individuals position. The amount of
equity awarded as a percentage of each executive officers
total compensation for 2004 (including base salary, annual
incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation)
represented from 24% to 43% of his or her total compensation,
depending on the individuals position.
|
|
|
Executive Stock Ownership |
We have adopted stock ownership guidelines to ensure that each
executive officer maintains a meaningful equity stake in the
company. The guidelines provide for the executive officers to
increase their ownership of Piper Jaffray Companies stock to a
face value equal to seven times base salary for the chief
executive officer, and two to five times salary for the other
executive officers, depending on the individuals position,
within five years after becoming subject to the guidelines. In
addition to the ownership guidelines, we have adopted a share
retention policy requiring the executive officers to hold at
least 50% of the shares awarded to them through the
companys incentive plans, net of taxes and transaction
costs, for a period of five years.
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer Compensation |
In determining Mr. Duffs incentive compensation for
2004 and his base salary for 2005, the Compensation Committee
took the following steps:
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed the financial performance and the total relative
shareholder return of Piper Jaffray Companies, comparable public
companies and other companies in the securities industry with
whom Piper Jaffray competes; |
|
|
|
Analyzed data regarding the types and amount of compensation,
including incentive compensation, paid to the chief executive
officers of comparable public companies and other companies in
the securities industry with whom Piper Jaffray competes; |
|
|
|
Reviewed historical compensation information for Mr. Duff,
including past grants of equity; |
|
|
|
Considered feedback from Mr. Duff, other members of
management, and the Board of Directors regarding
Mr. Duffs performance for 2004; and |
|
|
|
Independently evaluated Mr. Duffs performance as
chief executive officer against the 2004 performance goals and
objectives established for him by the Compensation Committee. |
After completing this process, the Compensation Committee
approved compensation for Mr. Duff under the annual
incentive program in the amount of $2,497,500, consisting of
$1,350,000 in cash
13
and $1,147,500 of restricted stock (a total of
28,963 shares). We also granted Mr. Duff a stock
option with a Black-Scholes value of $202,500 (a total of
11,719 shares). Consistent with our compensation philosophy
to pay a significant portion of incentive compensation in equity
in lieu of cash, Mr. Duff received 50% of his total
incentive compensation in equity and the remaining 50% in cash.
The number of shares of restricted stock was determined based on
the closing price of the companys common stock on
February 22, 2005, and the number of shares underlying the
stock option was based on the Black-Scholes value of the option
on that date. The restricted stock and options fully vest in
February 2008.
Mr. Duffs incentive compensation reflects our view of
his and the companys performance for 2004. Mr. Duff
successfully led Piper Jaffray through its first year as an
independent public company. He effectively guided the senior
management team in establishing the companys strategic
direction, and under his leadership, the company improved key
financial metrics, including a 93% increase in earnings per
share over 2003, and an improved return on tangible
shareholders equity, which increased to 12.9% for 2004
from 8.0% for 2003. Despite these improvements, revenue growth
was slow, increasing 1.4% over 2003.
Mr. Duffs annual base salary for 2005 remains
unchanged at $380,000. We believe Mr. Duffs salary
continues to be competitive based on market data, his experience
and his prior-year performance.
|
|
|
Policy on Qualifying Compensation for Deductibility |
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits
deductions for non-performance-based annual compensation in
excess of $1.0 million paid to the companys chief
executive officer and its other four most highly paid executive
officers. Our policy is to maximize the tax deductibility of
compensation payments to our executive officers. Accordingly, in
2004 we sought and obtained shareholder approval for the Piper
Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term
Incentive Plan, under which annual cash and equity incentives
are paid. The plan is designed and administered to qualify
compensation awarded thereunder as performance-based
to ensure that the tax deduction is available to the company. We
may, however, authorize payments to executive officers that may
not be fully deductible if we believe such payments are in the
interests of shareholders.
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Piper
Jaffray Companies
Michael R. Francis, Chairperson
Frank L. Sims
Richard A. Zona
Employment Arrangement with Addison L. Piper
We have established an employment arrangement with
Mr. Piper pursuant to which Mr. Piper serves as vice
chairman and as a member of our management committee (which is
comprised of all our executive officers). The employment
arrangement provides that Mr. Piper will be a full-time
employee of our company subject to the policies generally
applicable to other executive officers and will be paid an
annual base salary of $250,000 and a minimum annual bonus of
$500,000 for serving in these positions. The bonus amount will
be paid in a combination of cash and equity of our company. The
percentage of Mr. Pipers bonus that is to be paid in
equity in any given year will be determined in the same manner
used to determine the percentage of bonus to be paid in equity
for our other executive officers in accordance with
then-applicable compensation plans and programs. This
arrangement will continue through December 31, 2006.
Employment Arrangement with Paul D. Grangaard
We have agreed to make a $300,000 payment to Paul D. Grangaard,
head of our private client services business, in recognition of
his service to Piper Jaffray during the first quarter of 2005.
We previously announced Mr. Grangaards decision to
resign from Piper Jaffray effective April 1, 2005. In
14
light of his resignation, Mr. Grangaard will not
participate in our 2005 annual incentive program and is not
eligible to receive additional bonus compensation for 2005. He
will not receive other payments in connection with his
resignation, and at the time of his resignation,
Mr. Grangaard will forfeit all of the Piper Jaffray
Companies restricted stock and stock options previously awarded
to him, which are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table
below.
Termination and Change-in-Control Arrangements
All of our executive officers participate in the Piper Jaffray
Companies Severance Plan, a broad-based plan in which all of our
full-time, U.S.-based employees generally participate. Under the
plan, employees may receive severance pay up to a maximum of
$205,000 in the event of certain involuntary terminations of
employment resulting from an employer-determined severance
event. Such events may include closure of a company facility, a
permanent reduction in our workforce or an organizational change
that results in the elimination of the employees position.
Cash Award Agreements in Connection with Our Spin-Off from
U.S. Bancorp
In connection with our spin-off from U.S. Bancorp on
December 31, 2003, we established a cash award program
pursuant to which we granted cash awards to more than 2,300 of
our employees, including all of our executive officers, who were
employees of our business on December 15, 2003. These cash
awards were designed to aid in retaining highly skilled and
motivated employees and to provide fair treatment to our
employees whose U.S. Bancorp stock option and restricted
stock awards expired or were forfeited as a result of the
spin-off. The cash awards are not a part of our regular
compensation program. The cash award program was approved by
U.S. Bancorps board of directors prior to the
spin-off, and was approved by our Board both in advance of and
following the spin-off. The allocation and specific terms and
conditions of these cash awards were approved by our
Compensation Committee following the spin-off.
Each employee who was granted a cash award, including our chief
executive officer and the other four executive officers named in
the Summary Compensation Table below, has entered into a letter
agreement with us setting forth the terms and conditions of the
award. Pursuant to these agreements, Mr. Duff was granted a
discretionary cash award of $500,000 and Messrs. Duff,
Grangaard, Nordstrand, Peterson and Schnettler were granted
other cash awards replacing the lost value of U.S. Bancorp
options and restricted stock that expired or were forfeited as a
result of the spin-off.
Mr. Duffs discretionary cash award is payable in four
equal installments on each of March 31, 2004, 2005, 2006
and 2007. Mr. Duffs other cash award totaled
$4,567,096 and relates to the lost time value of
U.S. Bancorp stock options and restricted stock that
expired or were forfeited by Mr. Duff as a result of the
spin-off. Fifty percent of this other cash award was paid on
March 31, 2004, with the remaining 50% payable in four
equal installments on each of March 31, 2005, 2006, 2007
and 2008. Messrs. Grangaard, Nordstrand, Peterson and
Schnettler also are parties to cash award agreements relating to
the lost time value of U.S. Bancorp equity awards. Their
cash award amounts are $270,585, $26,394, $559,622 and $244,185,
respectively. Fifty percent of each cash award was paid on
March 31, 2004, with the remaining 50% payable in four
equal installments on each of March 31, 2005, 2006, 2007
and 2008. In all cases, the payments are conditioned on the
award recipients continued employment with Piper Jaffray
on the payment date, except that Piper Jaffray will continue to
pay the benefits if the recipients employment is
terminated by reason of death, disability or retirement, or is
terminated without cause during the 24-month period following a
change in control of Piper Jaffray. As a result of his
resignation from Piper Jaffray, Mr. Grangaard will forfeit
his cash award payments for 2006, 2007 and 2008.
Each award recipient acknowledged in the recipients cash
award agreement that (a) for purposes of any stock option
or other equity-based compensation award of U.S. Bancorp
held by the recipient, the completion of the spin-off
constituted a termination of employment with U.S. Bancorp,
and (b) with respect to any such options and awards that
terminated within 90 days following a
15
termination of employment, the recipient had no further rights
whatsoever after the expiration of the 90-day period following
the completion of the spin-off. The recipient generally waived
any and all claims relating to any stock option or other
equity-based compensation award of U.S. Bancorp. However,
the waiver did not apply to any rights relating to the exercise
of certain options within 90 days of the completion of the
spin-off, or with respect to any options or other equity-based
compensation awards of U.S. Bancorp that continued to vest
and remain exercisable beyond 90 days following a
termination of employment.
Summary Compensation Table
The following table contains compensation information for our
chief executive officer and our four other most highly
compensated executive officers for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The information for 2003 and 2002
included in this table reflects compensation earned by the
individuals for service with us while Piper Jaffray was a
subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp and, for Mr. Duff, for his
service as a vice chairman of U.S. Bancorp, a position he
held (in addition to serving as an executive officer of our
broker-dealer subsidiary) from 1999 until our spin-off from
U.S. Bancorp on December 31, 2003.
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Compensation Awards | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards | |
|
Payouts | |
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Annual | |
|
Restricted Stock | |
|
Securities | |
|
All Other | |
Name and Principal |
|
|
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Award(3) | |
|
Underlying | |
|
Compensation(6) | |
Position |
|
Year | |
|
($) | |
|
($) | |
|
($) | |
|
($) | |
|
Options(4)(5) | |
|
($) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Andrew S. Duff
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
380,000 |
|
|
|
1,350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,147,500 |
|
|
|
11,719 |
|
|
|
6,070 |
|
|
Chairman and CEO |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
379,700 |
|
|
|
2,266,250 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
632,765 |
|
|
|
24,940 |
|
|
|
4,575,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
378,200 |
|
|
|
225,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,680 |
|
Paul D. Grangaard
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
204,700 |
|
|
|
687,500 |
|
|
|
12,903 |
(2) |
|
|
478,125 |
|
|
|
4,883 |
|
|
|
9,586 |
|
|
Head of Private Client |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
203,200 |
|
|
|
566,250 |
|
|
|
24,275 |
(2) |
|
|
202,873 |
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
286,680 |
|
|
Services |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
203,200 |
|
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
72,500 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
Barry J. Nordstrand
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
200,533 |
|
|
|
495,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344,250 |
|
|
|
3,516 |
|
|
|
9,496 |
|
|
Head of Fixed Income |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
178,200 |
|
|
|
1,278,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458,123 |
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
42,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
178,200 |
|
|
|
1,025,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
Robert W. Peterson
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
198,033 |
|
|
|
880,000 |
|
|
|
3,287 |
(2) |
|
|
612,000 |
|
|
|
6,250 |
|
|
|
9,478 |
|
|
Head of Investment |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
163,200 |
|
|
|
922,500 |
|
|
|
8,625 |
(2) |
|
|
330,498 |
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
575,717 |
|
|
Research |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
163,200 |
|
|
|
946,800 |
|
|
|
25,750 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
Thomas P. Schnettler
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
198,033 |
|
|
|
1,787,500 |
|
|
|
12,271 |
(2) |
|
|
1,243,125 |
|
|
|
12,696 |
|
|
|
9,586 |
|
|
Head of Equities and |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
163,200 |
|
|
|
1,391,250 |
|
|
|
37,225 |
(2) |
|
|
498,452 |
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
260,279 |
|
|
Investment Banking |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
163,200 |
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
72,950 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Consists of (a) a cash bonus of $1,766,250 and (b) a
discretionary cash award of $500,000 granted in connection with
our spin-off from U.S. Bancorp. The discretionary award is
payable in four equal installments on each of March 31,
2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, so long as Mr. Duff remains
employed by Piper Jaffray on each payment date. See
Cash Award Agreement in Connection with Our
Spin-Off from U.S. Bancorp above. |
|
|
(2) |
Consists of amounts paid under the U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray
Inc. Second Century Growth Deferred Compensation Plan (As
Amended and Restated Effective September 30, 1998) and the
U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc. Second Century 2000 Deferred
Compensation Plan. Certain key employees were eligible to
participate in these plans. Under the plans, participants were
granted a deferred bonus award, which was deemed invested in
certain measuring investments. Following a liquidity event (as
defined in the plans) for a particular measuring investment, the
participant receives a benefit payment based on the deemed
return to the participant with respect to the measuring
investment as well as payment of that portion of the
participants account that was deemed invested.
Participants may |
16
|
|
|
continue to receive payments under the plans until a liquidity
or bankruptcy event has occurred with respect to each measuring
investment in which deferred bonus awards are deemed to be
invested. Messrs. Grangaard, Peterson and Schnettler were
granted deferred bonus awards under these plans in 1996, 1997,
1998 and/or 2000. |
|
(3) |
The 2004 and 2003 awards of restricted stock were granted on
February 22, 2005, and February 12, 2004,
respectively, as part of each executive officers annual
incentive compensation for the year indicated. The awards will
vest 100% on February 22, 2008, and February 12, 2007,
respectively. The restricted stock is subject to forfeiture
prior to vesting in the event the officer is terminated for
cause or misappropriates confidential company information,
participates in a business similar to Piper Jaffray, accepts a
similar position with another company or solicits employees,
customers or clients of Piper Jaffray after certain terminations
of employment with Piper Jaffray. Recipients have the right to
receive dividends (if any) on and to vote the shares of Piper
Jaffray restricted stock they hold. For 2004, the number of
shares awarded to each executive officer was determined by
dividing specified dollar amounts representing a percentage of
the individuals total bonus compensation by $39.62, the
closing price of our common stock on February 22, 2005. The
number of shares awarded to each executive officer for 2003 was
determined by dividing specified dollar amounts representing a
percentage of the individuals total bonus compensation by
$47.30, the average closing price of our common stock for the
five consecutive trading days ended February 11, 2004. As
required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
the award value that is reported in the Summary Compensation
Table was determined by multiplying the closing sales price of
one share of Piper Jaffray common stock on the grant date of the
restricted stock by the number of shares awarded.
Mr. Grangaard will forfeit his restricted stock awards for
2004 and 2003 at the time of his resignation. |
|
|
|
The value of each officers aggregate restricted stock
holdings at December 31, 2004, as determined based on a closing
price of $47.95 for our common stock on December 31, 2004,
and the number of restricted shares held as of December 31,
2004 were: for Mr. Duff, $596,882 and 12,448 shares; for
Mr. Grangaard, $191,368 and 3,991 shares; for
Mr. Nordstrand, $432,125 and 9,012 shares; for
Mr. Peterson, $311,771 and 6,502 shares; and for
Mr. Schnettler, $470,150 and 9,805 shares.
|
|
|
(4) |
The 2004 and 2003 entries for the number of securities
underlying options reflect stock option awards granted to the
executive officers on February 22, 2005 and February 12,
2004, respectively. These awards were not part of the annual
incentive compensation paid to the executive officers for 2004
and 2003, but were granted at the same time the annual incentive
compensation was awarded. Mr. Grangaard will forfeit his
stock option awards at the time of his resignation. |
|
|
(5) |
The table excludes U.S. Bancorp equity awards granted to the
named executive officers in 2003 and 2002 while Piper Jaffray
was a subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. No U.S. Bancorp restricted
stock awards were granted to the named executive officers as
part of their annual incentive compensation for 2003 or 2002. In
2002, options to purchase U.S. Bancorp common stock were awarded
to all of the named executive officers except Mr. Duff. The
number of shares underlying U.S. Bancorp stock options awarded
in 2002 that remained outstanding on December 31, 2003,
were adjusted on that date to maintain the economic value of the
awards in connection with the special stock dividend paid to
U.S. Bancorp shareholders to effect our spin-off from U.S.
Bancorp on that date. This adjustment was effected by
multiplying the number of shares underlying the option by
1.0068. The adjusted number of shares of U.S. Bancorp common
stock underlying U.S. Bancorp stock options granted to the named
executive officers in 2002 are as follows: Mr. Duff, 0
shares; Mr. Grangaard, 12,912 shares; Mr. Nordstrand,
24,651 shares; Mr. Peterson, 12,428 shares; and
Mr. Schnettler, 12,428 shares. |
17
|
|
(6) |
All other compensation consists of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew S. | |
|
Paul D. | |
|
Barry J. | |
|
Robert W. | |
|
Thomas P. | |
Form of All Other Compensation |
|
Year |
|
Duff | |
|
Grangaard | |
|
Nordstrand | |
|
Peterson | |
|
Schnettler | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash award replacing value lost as
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a result of the expiration or
|
|
2003 |
|
$ |
4,567,096 |
|
|
$ |
270,585 |
|
|
$ |
26,394 |
|
|
$ |
559,622 |
|
|
$ |
244,184 |
|
forfeiture of U.S. Bancorp stock
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
options and/or restricted stock in connection with
our spin-off |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matching contributions made
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,516 |
|
|
$ |
3,516 |
|
|
$ |
3,516 |
|
|
$ |
3,516 |
|
under the 401(k) component of
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
the Piper Jaffray Companies
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
Retirement Plan (for 2004) or the U.S. Bancorp
401(k) Savings Plan (for 2003 and 2002) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit-sharing contribution made
|
|
2004 |
|
$ |
5,125 |
|
|
$ |
5,125 |
|
|
$ |
5,125 |
|
|
$ |
5,125 |
|
|
$ |
5,125 |
|
under the Piper Jaffray Companies
|
|
2003 |
|
$ |
7,825 |
|
|
$ |
7,825 |
|
|
$ |
7,825 |
|
|
$ |
7,825 |
|
|
$ |
7,825 |
|
Retirement Plan
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance Allowance
|
|
2004 |
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
$ |
3,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Disability Insurance
|
|
2004 |
|
$ |
675 |
|
|
$ |
675 |
|
|
$ |
675 |
|
|
$ |
675 |
|
|
$ |
675 |
|
Allowance
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance Premium Rebate
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
$ |
429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For detail regarding payment of the cash awards, see
Cash Award Agreement in Connection with Our
Spin-Off from U.S. Bancorp above. |
Perquisites
The Summary Compensation Table does not include perquisites and
other personal benefits, securities or property received by the
executive officers because the aggregate amount of this
compensation for each of the executive officers named in the
table is the lesser of either $50,000 or 10% of the total annual
salary and bonus reported for each such officer, and therefore
is not required to be included under regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The perquisites received in
2004 by our executive officers named in the Summary Compensation
Table consist of reimbursement for the cost of a parking space
and, for some of our executive officers, reimbursement for a
portion of the dues paid by them for business-related club
membership. The Companys cost for these perquisites in
2004 did not exceed $7,000 for any individual executive officer.
All of our executive officers are eligible to participate in our
charitable gift matching program, which is open to all of our
employees and directors. Pursuant to this program, we will match
an employees or directors gifts to eligible
organizations dollar for dollar from a minimum of $50 up to an
aggregate maximum of $1,000 per year.
18
Option Grants
The following table provides information about options to
purchase shares of our common stock that were granted to our
chief executive officer and the other executive officers named
in the Summary Compensation Table on February 22, 2005, and
February 12, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Total Options | |
|
|
|
Closing Market | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities | |
|
Granted to | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Price on Date | |
|
|
|
Grant Date | |
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Employees in | |
|
per Share | |
|
of Grant | |
|
|
|
Present Value | |
Name |
|
Options Granted | |
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
($) | |
|
($) | |
|
Expiration Date | |
|
($) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Andrew S. Duff
|
|
|
11,719 |
|
|
|
2.98 |
(1) |
|
|
39.62 |
(3) |
|
|
39.62 |
|
|
|
February 22, 2015 |
|
|
|
202,504 |
(5) |
|
|
|
24,940 |
|
|
|
8.29 |
(2) |
|
|
47.30 |
(4) |
|
|
51.05 |
|
|
|
February 12, 2014 |
|
|
|
542,694 |
(6) |
Paul D. Grangaard
|
|
|
4,883 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
(1) |
|
|
39.62 |
(3) |
|
|
39.62 |
|
|
|
February 22, 2015 |
|
|
|
84,378 |
(5) |
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
(2) |
|
|
47.30 |
(4) |
|
|
51.05 |
|
|
|
February 12, 2014 |
|
|
|
42,171 |
(6) |
Barry J. Nordstrand
|
|
|
3,516 |
|
|
|
0.89 |
(1) |
|
|
39.62 |
(3) |
|
|
39.62 |
|
|
|
February 22, 2015 |
|
|
|
60,756 |
(5) |
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
(2) |
|
|
47.30 |
(4) |
|
|
51.05 |
|
|
|
February 12, 2014 |
|
|
|
42,171 |
(6) |
Robert W. Peterson
|
|
|
6,250 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
(1) |
|
|
39.62 |
(3) |
|
|
39.62 |
|
|
|
February 22, 2015 |
|
|
|
108,000 |
(5) |
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
(2) |
|
|
47.30 |
(4) |
|
|
51.05 |
|
|
|
February 12, 2014 |
|
|
|
42,171 |
(6) |
Thomas P. Schnettler
|
|
|
12,696 |
|
|
|
3.22 |
(1) |
|
|
39.62 |
(3) |
|
|
39.62 |
|
|
|
February 22, 2015 |
|
|
|
219,387 |
(5) |
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
(2) |
|
|
47.30 |
(4) |
|
|
51.05 |
|
|
|
February 12, 2014 |
|
|
|
42,171 |
(6) |
|
|
(1) |
Based on options granted to employees during 2005 through
March 2, 2005, to purchase a total of 393,786 shares of our
common stock. |
|
|
(2) |
Based on options granted to employees during 2004 to purchase a
total of 300,980 shares of our common stock. |
|
(3) |
The exercise price is the closing price of our common stock on
February 22, 2005. |
|
(4) |
The exercise price is the average closing price of our common
stock for the five consecutive trading days ended
February 11, 2004. |
|
|
(5) |
The options to purchase shares of Piper Jaffray Companies common
stock granted on February 22, 2005, were valued using a
Black-Scholes option pricing method that assumed a risk-free
interest rate of 3.76%, a dividend yield of zero, a stock
volatility factor of 38.57% and an expected life of the options
of six years, resulting in an option value of $17.28. |
|
|
(6) |
The options to purchase shares of Piper Jaffray Companies common
stock granted on February 12, 2004, were valued using a
Black-Scholes option pricing method that assumed a risk-free
interest rate of 3.25%, a dividend yield of zero, a stock
volatility factor of 39.92% and an expected life of the options
of six years, resulting in an option value of $21.76. |
19
Year-End Option Values
The following table provides information about unexercised
options to purchase shares of Piper Jaffray Companies common
stock held by our chief executive officer and the other
executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table as of
December 31, 2004. In 2004, options were granted on
February 12, 2004. The options that were granted on
February 22, 2005 and included in the Summary Compensation
Table are not included in the following table. Neither our chief
executive officer nor any other officer named in the Summary
Compensation Table held options to purchase shares of Piper
Jaffray Companies common stock that were exercisable as of
December 31, 2004, and, as a result, no options had been
exercised as of December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
Underlying Unexercised | |
|
In-the-Money Options | |
|
|
Options at Fiscal Year-End | |
|
at Fiscal Year-End(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Andrew S. Duff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,211 |
|
Paul D. Grangaard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,260 |
|
Barry J. Nordstrand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,260 |
|
Robert W. Peterson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,260 |
|
Thomas P. Schnettler
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,260 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The value of unexercised in-the-money options at fiscal year-end
was calculated based on the difference between the closing price
of our common stock on December 31, 2004 of $47.95, and the
option exercise price of $47.30, multiplied by the number of
shares underlying each option. |
Outstanding Equity Awards
The only equity plan we have established is our Amended and
Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan. The following
table summarizes, as of December 31, 2004, the number of
shares of our common stock to be issued upon exercise of
outstanding options granted under the plan, the weighted-average
exercise price of such options, and the number of shares
remaining available for future issuance under the plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining for | |
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
|
Future Issuance | |
|
|
to Be Issued Upon | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Under Equity | |
|
|
Exercise of | |
|
Exercise Price of | |
|
Compensation | |
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
Outstanding Options, | |
|
Plans (Excluding | |
|
|
Options, Warrants | |
|
Warrants and | |
|
Shares in First | |
Plan Category |
|
and Rights (#) | |
|
Rights ($) | |
|
Column) (#) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders
|
|
|
295,683 |
|
|
$ |
47.50 |
|
|
|
3,272,432 |
(1) |
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(1) |
A total of 4,100,000 shares currently are authorized for
issuance under the plan. In addition to the 295,683 shares to be
issued upon the exercise of outstanding options to purchase our
common stock, 531,885 shares of restricted stock that have been
issued under the plan were outstanding as of December 31,
2004. All of the 3,272,432 shares available for future issuance
under the plan as of December 31, 2004, may be granted in
the form of restricted stock, restricted stock units, options or
another equity-based award authorized under the plan. |
20
Retirement Plans
We maintain the Piper Jaffray Companies Retirement Plan, which
consists of a 401(k) component and a non-contributory
profit-sharing component. We match 100% of each participating
employees 401(k) contributions up to a maximum of 4% of
the employees total pay up to the social security taxable
wage base. In addition, under the profit-sharing component, we
have discretion to make contributions on behalf of all of our
employees on an annual basis. These contributions are based on
our financial performance.
Prior to 2002, our employees participated in the U.S. Bancorp
Cash Balance Pension Plan. The cash balance pension plan
consisted of a career average pay plan and a defined benefit
excess plan. Essentially all full-time employees of U.S. Bancorp
and its subsidiaries were eligible to participate in the career
average pay plan. Under the terms of the career average pay
plan, a notional account balance was maintained for each
participating employee. The defined benefit excess plan provided
retirement benefits that would have been provided under the
career average pay plan but for certain provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code that limit deferral of compensation. In
2002, upon establishing our non-contributory profit-sharing plan
(now included in the Piper Jaffray Companies Retirement Plan),
Piper Jaffray withdrew as a participating employer in the U.S.
Bancorp Cash Balance Pension Plan. Following our spin-off from
U.S. Bancorp, our employees with vested benefits in the career
average pay plan may withdraw those benefits at the
employees request. The liability for any benefits payable
to our employees under the career average pay plan remains with
U.S. Bancorp. In 2004, our chief executive officer and our other
officers named in the Summary Compensation Table withdrew their
vested balances as follows: Mr. Duff, $31,981;
Mr. Grangaard, $33,217; Mr. Nordstrand, $31,981;
Mr. Peterson, $31,981; and Mr. Schnettler, $32,734.
Following the spin-off, we assumed U.S. Bancorps liability
for the non-qualified benefits accrued to our employees under
the defined benefit excess plan. In 2004, we established the
Piper Jaffray Companies Non-Qualified Retirement Plan to
maintain and administer these benefits, which were transferred
to our Non-Qualified Retirement Plan following the spin-off.
Following the transfer, participation in our Non-Qualified
Retirement Plan was frozen and no new benefits may be earned by
participants in this plan. However, participating employees will
continue to receive investment credits on their transferred plan
balances in accordance with the terms of our plan. Each
employees plan balance will be payable by us upon the
employees retirement or termination of employment. The
account balances for our named executive officers as of
December 31, 2004, under our Non-Qualified Retirement Plan
were as follows: Mr. Duff, $380,412; Mr. Grangaard,
$921,111; Mr. Nordstrand, $89,260; Mr. Peterson,
$357,212; and Mr. Schnettler, $647,115.
21
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares the performance of an investment in
our common stock from January 2, 2004, the date our common
stock began regular-way trading on the New York Stock
Exchange following our spin-off from U.S. Bancorp, with the
S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Diversified
Financials Index. The graph assumes $100 was invested on
January 2, 2004, in each of our common stock, the
S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Diversified
Financial Index and that all dividends were reinvested on the
date of payment without payment of any commissions. Dollar
amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar.
Based on these assumptions, the cumulative total return would
have been $111.51 for our common stock, $111.23 for the
S&P 500 Index and $108.59 for the S&P 500
Diversified Financials Index. The performance shown in the graph
represents past performance and should not be considered an
indication of future performance.
CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN FOR PIPER JAFFRAY COMMON STOCK, THE
S&P 500
INDEX AND THE S&P 500 DIVERSIFIED FINANCIALS INDEX
22
SECURITY OWNERSHIP
Stock Ownership Guidelines
We believe it is important for our directors and executive
officers to have a meaningful equity interest in our company, to
ensure that their interests are aligned with the interests of
our shareholders. Our Board of Directors has adopted stock
ownership guidelines to establish its minimum expectations for
our directors and executive officers with respect to their
equity stake in our company.
Our stock ownership guidelines provide for equity ownership by
our executive officers in an amount having a market value
ranging from two to seven times the individuals annual
base salary, depending upon the individuals position, to
be achieved within five years of the date the individual became
subject to the guidelines. Both common stock and restricted
stock count towards these ownership guidelines. Each of our
current executive officers became subject to these ownership
guidelines in 2004, the year in which the guidelines were
initially adopted. The table below under Beneficial
Ownership of Directors, Nominees and Executive Officers
shows how many shares of stock were owned as of March 2,
2005, by each of our executive officers named in the Summary
Compensation Table for purposes of measuring compliance with the
guidelines.
In addition to the ownership guidelines, our executive officers
are subject to retention guidelines providing that each
executive officer must retain for five years at least 50% of all
shares received by the officer upon vesting of a restricted
stock award and upon exercise of a stock option award.
Our stock ownership guidelines provide for equity ownership by
our non-employee directors in an amount equal to two times the
directors annual cash retainer, to be achieved within
three years after the directors initial election to the
Board. Both common stock and phantom stock (acquired under our
Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors) are
counted towards these ownership guidelines. The table below
under Beneficial Ownership of Directors, Nominees and
Executive Officers includes the number of shares of our
common stock and phantom stock that were deemed owned as of
March 2, 2005, by each of our non-employee directors for
purposes of measuring compliance with the guidelines.
23
Beneficial Ownership of Directors, Nominees and Executive
Officers
The following table shows how many shares of our common stock
were beneficially owned as of March 2, 2005, by each of our
directors, director nominees and executive officers named in the
Summary Compensation Table contained in this proxy statement,
and by all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
Unless otherwise noted, the shareholders listed in the table
have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares
of common stock owned by them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phantom Shares | |
|
|
Shares of | |
|
Counted Towards | |
|
|
Piper Jaffray | |
|
Director Stock | |
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Common Stock* | |
|
Ownership Guidelines** | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Andrew S. Duff
|
|
|
47,267 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
Michael R. Francis
|
|
|
4,205 |
(2) |
|
|
584 |
|
Paul D. Grangaard
|
|
|
16,415 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
B. Kristine Johnson
|
|
|
4,705 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
Samuel L. Kaplan
|
|
|
10,248 |
(5) |
|
|
1,168 |
|
Barry J. Nordstrand
|
|
|
17,947 |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
Robert W. Peterson
|
|
|
22,228 |
(7) |
|
|
|
|
Addison L. Piper
|
|
|
8,666 |
(8) |
|
|
|
|
Thomas P. Schnettler
|
|
|
41,416 |
(9) |
|
|
|
|
Frank L. Sims
|
|
|
6,705 |
(10) |
|
|
|
|
Richard A. Zona
|
|
|
6,794 |
(11) |
|
|
1,231 |
|
All directors, director nominees and executive officers as a
group (14 persons)
|
|
|
202,321 |
(12) |
|
|
2,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
The beneficial owners identified in this table do not own more
than 1% of outstanding Piper Jaffray common stock either
individually or as a group. The holders of restricted stock
identified in the footnotes below have no investment power with
respect to the restricted stock. |
|
|
|
|
** |
The shares of phantom stock may be settled solely in cash based
on the fair market value of our common stock on the last day of
the year in which the directors service as a director
terminates. The directors have no voting or investment power
with respect to the phantom stock. |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes 12,448 shares of restricted stock that vest in full on
February 12, 2007, 28,963 shares of restricted stock that
vest in full on February 22, 2008, 5,349 shares of common
stock held directly and 507 shares of common stock held in
the Piper Jaffray Companies Retirement Plan. |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Consists of shares of common stock covered by options that are
currently exercisable. |
|
|
(3) |
Includes 3,991 shares of restricted stock that vest in full on
February 12, 2007, 12,068 shares of restricted stock that
vest in full on February 22, 2008, 277 shares of
common stock held directly, 68 shares of common stock held
in the Piper Jaffray Companies Retirement Plan and
11 shares of common stock held in an individual retirement
account. |
|
|
(4) |
Includes 500 shares of common stock held in an individual
retirement account and 4,205 shares of common stock covered by
options that are currently exercisable. |
|
|
|
|
(5) |
Includes 6,043 shares of common stock held in the Kaplan,
Strangis & Kaplan profit-sharing trust for the benefit
of Mr. Kaplan and 4,205 shares of common stock covered
by options that are currently exercisable. |
|
|
|
|
(6) |
Includes 9,012 shares of restricted stock that vest in full on
February 12, 2007, 8,689 shares of restricted stock that
vest in full on February 22, 2008, 68 shares of common
stock held in the Piper Jaffray Companies Retirement Plan and
178 shares held in an individual retirement account. |
|
|
(7) |
Includes 6,502 shares of restricted stock that vest in full on
February 12, 2007, 15,447 shares of restricted stock that
vest in full on February 22, 2008, 197 shares of common
stock held directly, 68 |
24
|
|
|
|
|
shares of common stock held in the Piper Jaffray Companies
Retirement Plan and 14 shares of common stock held in an
individual retirement account. |
|
|
(8) |
Includes 1,798 shares of restricted stock that vest in full on
February 12, 2007, 5,364 shares of restricted stock that
vest in full on February 22, 2008, 502 shares of common
stock held directly, 1,000 shares of common stock held in an
individual retirement account and 2 shares of common stock held
by Mr. Pipers spouse. |
|
|
(9) |
Includes 9,805 shares of restricted stock that vest in full on
February 12, 2007, 31,377 shares of restricted stock that
vest in full on February 22, 2008, 166 shares of common
stock held directly and 68 shares of common stock held in the
Piper Jaffray Companies Retirement Plan. |
|
|
(10) |
Includes 2,500 shares of common stock held directly and 4,205
shares of common stock covered by options that are currently
exercisable. |
|
|
(11) |
Includes 2,589 shares of common stock held directly and 4,205
shares of common stock covered by options that are currently
exercisable. |
|
(12) |
Includes 48,182 shares of restricted stock that vest in full on
February 12, 2007, 112,593 shares of restricted stock that vest
in full on February 22, 2008, 983 shares of common stock held in
the Piper Jaffray Companies Retirement Plan, 7,756 shares held
in a retirement or profit-sharing plan or account (other than
the Piper Jaffray Companies Retirement Plan), 11,783 shares of
common stock held directly or by family members, and 21,025
shares covered by options that are currently exercisable. |
Beneficial Owners of More than Five Percent of Our Common
Stock
Based on filings made under Section 13(d) and
Section 13(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
our knowledge, as of March 2, 2005, the only persons known
by us to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of our common
stock were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of | |
|
|
|
|
Piper Jaffray | |
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Common Stock | |
|
Percent of Class | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
|
|
|
1,377,578 |
(1) |
|
|
6.66% |
|
|
100 E. Pratt Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
This information is based on a Schedule 13G filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2005, by
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
reported that it has sole voting power as to 208,700 shares of
common stock and shared investment power as to 1,377,578 shares
of common stock. |
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING
COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
requires our executive officers and directors to file initial
reports of ownership of our securities and reports of changes in
ownership of our securities with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Based on our knowledge and on written
representations from our executive officers and directors, we
believe that all Section 16(a) filing and disclosure
requirements applicable to our executive officers and directors
for 2004 have been satisfied.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
The Compensation Committee, comprised entirely of independent,
non-employee directors, is responsible for establishing and
administering our policies involving the compensation of our
executive officers. No employee of the company serves on the
Compensation Committee. The Committee members have no
interlocking relationships as defined by the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
25
Related Transactions Involving Our Directors and Executive
Officers
Tad W. Piper is the son of Addison L. Piper, one of our
executive officers and a director, and is employed by us as a
senior research analyst and was paid compensation in excess of
$60,000 for such services in 2004.
Paul V. Olson is the brother of B. Kristine Johnson, one of our
directors, and is employed by us as a financial advisor in our
private client services business and was paid compensation in
excess of $60,000 for such services in 2004.
During 2004, we paid approximately $1.1 million in legal
fees to Faegre & Benson LLP for legal services provided to
us and our subsidiaries. The spouse of James L. Chosy, general
counsel and secretary of the company, is a partner with Faegre
& Benson. Mr. Chosys spouse has not personally
provided legal services to us or our subsidiaries.
In the ordinary course of business, Piper Jaffray, through our
subsidiaries, from time to time engages in transactions with
other corporations or entities whose executive officers or
directors also are directors or executive officers of Piper
Jaffray or have an affiliation with our directors or executive
officers. Such transactions are conducted on an
arms-length basis and may not come to the attention of our
directors or executive officers or those of the other
corporations or entities involved. In addition, from time to
time our executive officers and directors and their affiliates
may engage in transactions in the ordinary course of business
involving goods and services provided by Piper Jaffray, such as
investment and financial advisory services. With respect to our
executive officers, such goods and services are provided on
terms comparable to those extended to employees of our company
generally. With respect to our non-employee directors and their
affiliates, such services are provided on substantially the same
terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable
transactions with non-employees.
From time to time, certain of our directors, executive officers
and other employees who are accredited investors may invest
their personal funds directly in funds managed by Piper Jaffray,
through our subsidiaries, on the same terms and with the same
conditions as the other investors in these funds, who may not be
our directors, executive officers or employees. In 2004 certain
of our executive officers received aggregate distributions
exceeding $60,000 from these funds, as follows: Mr. Duff,
$156,291; Mr. Grangaard, $266,960; Mr. Peterson,
$181,290; Mr. Piper, $376,013; and Mr. Schnettler,
$292,056. In addition, Mr. Piper and Ms. Johnson each
invested $250,000 in one such fund in 2004.
To the extent permitted by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, our
directors and executive officers and their affiliates from time
to time may be or may have been indebted to Piper Jaffray or our
subsidiaries in connection with margin account loans. Such
indebtedness is in the ordinary course of business, is on
substantially the same terms, including interest rates and
collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable
transactions with other persons and does not involve more than a
normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable
features.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT AND PAYMENT OF FEES TO OUR INDEPENDENT
AUDITOR
Audit Committee Report
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for
assisting the Board in overseeing the integrity of the financial
statements of Piper Jaffray Companies, compliance by Piper
Jaffray Companies with legal and regulatory requirements, and
the independence and performance of Piper Jaffray
Companies internal and external auditors.
The consolidated financial statements of Piper Jaffray for the
year ended December 31, 2004, were audited by Ernst &
Young LLP, independent auditor for Piper Jaffray.
26
As part of its activities, the Committee has:
|
|
|
|
1. |
Reviewed and discussed with management and the independent
auditor the audited financial statements of Piper Jaffray
Companies; |
|
|
2. |
Discussed with the independent auditor the matters required to
be communicated under Statement on Auditing Standards
No. 61 (Communications with Audit Committees); |
|
|
3. |
Received the written disclosures and letter from the independent
auditor required by Independence Standards Board Standard
No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees);
and |
|
|
4. |
Discussed with the independent auditor its independence. |
Management is responsible for Piper Jaffrays system of
internal controls and the financial reporting process. Ernst
& Young LLP is responsible for performing an independent
audit of the consolidated financial statements in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board and issuing a report thereon. Our Committees
responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.
Based on the foregoing review and discussions and a review of
the report of Ernst & Young LLP with respect to the
consolidated financial statements, and relying thereon, we have
recommended to the Board of Directors of Piper Jaffray Companies
the inclusion of the audited consolidated financial statements
in Piper Jaffrays Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004, for filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Piper Jaffray
Companies
Richard A. Zona, Chairperson
B. Kristine Johnson
Frank L. Sims
Auditor Fees
Ernst & Young LLP served as our independent auditor for
2004. The following table presents fees for professional audit
services for the audit of our annual consolidated financial
statements for 2004 and 2003 as well as fees for the review of
our interim consolidated financial statements for each quarter
in 2004 and 2003 and for all other services performed for 2004
and 2003 by Ernst & Young LLP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Audit Fees
|
|
$ |
753,215 |
|
|
$ |
494,990 |
|
Audit-Related
Fees(1)
|
|
$ |
51,000 |
|
|
|
66,950 |
|
Tax
Fees(2)
|
|
$ |
386,000 |
|
|
|
162,528 |
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,190,315 |
|
|
$ |
724,468 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Audit-related services for 2004 primarily include services
relating to IRA Keogh agreed-upon procedures and employee
benefit plan audits. Audit-related services for 2003 primarily
include services relating to agency selling group and IRA Keogh
agreed-upon procedures. |
|
|
(2) |
Tax fees consist of tax compliance fees and tax consultation
fees. Tax compliance fees totaled $288,000 in 2004 and $139,952
in 2003. Tax compliance services in 2004 consisted of services
relating to federal, state and local estimated tax calculations,
federal and state partnership tax returns, and foreign tax
services performed for our U.K. subsidiary Piper Jaffray Ltd.
Tax compliance services in 2003 consisted of services relating
to our partnership tax returns and foreign tax services
performed for our subsidiary Piper Jaffray Ltd. Tax consultation
services in 2004 totaled $98,000 in 2004 and $22,576 in 2003.
Tax consultation services consisted of state value analysis,
acquisition due diligence and transfer |
27
|
|
|
pricing consultation and in 2003 consisted of sales and use tax
review. For 2005, we have hired KPMG LLP to provide tax
services, including tax compliance services and tax consultation
services. As a result, we do not expect to incur tax fees from
services provided by Ernst & Young LLP for 2005. |
Auditor Services Pre-Approval Policy
The Audit Committee has adopted an auditor services pre-approval
policy applicable to services performed for us by our
independent auditor. In accordance with this policy, the Audit
Committees practice is to approve annually all audit
services and, on a case-by-case basis, recurring permissible
non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditor
during the year. The Audit Committee reviews each non-audit
service to be provided and assesses the impact of the service on
the auditors independence. In addition, the Audit
Committee may pre-approve other non-audit services during the
year on a case-by-case basis, and has delegated authority to
grant such pre-approvals during the year to the chairperson of
the Audit Committee. Any pre-approvals granted pursuant to this
delegated authority are reported to the Audit Committee at its
next regular meeting.
Prior to completion of our spin-off from U.S. Bancorp on
December 31, 2003, Piper Jaffray was not an independent
company and did not have an audit committee. However, the audit
committee of U.S. Bancorp did pre-approve all non-audit services
provided to U.S. Bancorp and its subsidiaries by its independent
auditor. Our Audit Committee has determined that the provision
of the non-audit services described in the table above was
compatible with maintaining the independence of our independent
auditor. On February 22, 2005, the Audit Committee
pre-approved certain services to be provided by our independent
auditor relating to engagements occurring on or after
February 22, 2005.
ITEM 2 RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT
AUDITOR
The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has selected
Ernst & Young LLP to continue to serve as our
independent auditor for the year ending December 31, 2005.
While it is not required to do so, our Board of Directors is
submitting the selection of Ernst & Young LLP for
ratification in order to ascertain the views of our shareholders
with respect to Ernst & Young LLP. If the selection is not
ratified, our Audit Committee will reconsider its selection.
Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be
present at the annual meeting, will be available to answer
shareholder questions and will have the opportunity to make a
statement if they desire to do so.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR
ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as
the independent auditor of Piper Jaffray Companies and our
subsidiaries for the year ending December 31, 2005. Proxies
will be voted FOR ratifying this selection unless otherwise
specified.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2006 ANNUAL MEETING
In order for a shareholder proposal, including a director
nomination, to be considered for inclusion in our proxy
statement for the 2006 annual meeting of shareholders, the
written proposal must be received at our principal executive
offices at 800 Nicollet Mall, Suite 800, Minneapolis,
Minnesota 55402, Attention: Office of the Secretary, on or
before November 16, 2005. The proposal must comply with
Securities and Exchange Commission regulations regarding the
inclusion of shareholder proposals in company-sponsored proxy
materials.
In accordance with our bylaws, in order to be properly brought
before the 2006 annual meeting, a shareholders notice of
the matter the shareholder wishes to present must be delivered
to the Office of the Secretary of Piper Jaffray at our principal
executive offices in Minneapolis, Minnesota, at the address
identified in the preceding paragraph, not less than 90 nor more
than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of
this years annual meeting. As a result, any notice given
by or on behalf
28
of a shareholder pursuant to these provisions of our bylaws (and
not pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Securities and Exchange
Commission) must be received no earlier than December 28,
2005, and no later than January 27, 2006.
ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS AND FORM 10-K
Our 2004 Annual Report to Shareholders, including financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2004,
accompanies this proxy statement. Shareholders who wish to
obtain an additional copy of our Annual Report and/or a copy of
the Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission for the year ended December 31, 2004, may do so
without charge by viewing these documents on our Web site at
www.piperjaffray.com or by writing to Piper Jaffray Companies,
Attention: Investor Relations, 800 Nicollet Mall,
Suite 800, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402.
OTHER MATTERS
We do not know of any other matters that may be presented for
consideration at the annual meeting. If any other business does
properly come before the annual meeting, the persons named as
proxies on the enclosed proxy card will vote as they deem in the
best interests of Piper Jaffray.
|
|
|
|
|
|
James L. Chosy
|
|
Secretary |
Dated: March 16, 2005
29
APPENDIX A
PIPER JAFFRAY COMPANIES
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE STANDARDS
As Adopted by the Board of Directors
on December 9, 2004
The Board of Directors of Piper Jaffray Companies has adopted
these Director Independence Standards to assist the Board in
making determinations of director independence in accordance
with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.
The Board will assess the independence of each director on an
annual basis prior to approving director nominees for inclusion
in the proxy statement for the Companys annual meeting of
shareholders. If a director is appointed to the Board between
annual meetings, the Board will assess the directors
independence at the time of such appointment. Directors must
notify the Board promptly of any change in circumstances that
might be perceived as putting the directors independence
at issue. If so notified, the Board will reevaluate the
directors independence as soon as practicable.
Under these standards, a director will be deemed independent for
purposes of service on the Board only if:
|
|
|
(1) the director does not have any relationship described
in NYSE Rule 303A.02(b); |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
in the event the director has a relationship that exceeds the
limits described below, the Board determines in its judgment,
after broad consideration of all relevant facts and
circumstances, that the relationship is not material; and |
|
|
(3) |
the Board reviews all commercial, banking, consulting, legal,
accounting, charitable, familial and other relationships the
director has with the Company that are not of a type described
below, and determines in its judgment, after broad consideration
of all relevant facts and circumstances, that the relationship
is not material. |
The fact that a particular relationship or transaction is
required to be disclosed in the annual proxy statement under SEC
rules will not be dispositive for purposes of determining
whether the relationship or transaction is material. If the
Board determines that a relationship described in (2) or
(3) above is not material, the basis for that determination
will be explained in the Companys annual proxy statement,
as required by NYSE Rule 303A.02(a)(2).
The following relationships will not be deemed to be
material relationships that would cause a director not to be
independent:
(a) the Company has made payments for goods or services to,
or has received payments for goods or services from, the primary
business affiliation(1) of the director or an immediate family
member(2) of the director in an aggregate amount during a fiscal
year that does not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2%
of such other companys consolidated gross revenues for
that fiscal year;
(1) For purposes of these standards, a directors
primary business affiliation means an entity of
which the director is an executive officer, partner or employee
or owns directly or indirectly at least a 10% equity interest,
and an immediate family members primary business
affiliation means an entity of which the immediate family
member is an executive officer, general partner or owns directly
or indirectly at least a 10% equity interest.
(2) For purposes of these standards, an immediate
family member includes a persons spouse, parents,
children, siblings, mothers- and fathers-in-law, sons- and
daughters-in-law, brothers- and sisters-in-law, and anyone
(other than domestic employees) who shares such persons
home.
A-1
(b) lending relationships, deposit relationships, or other
banking relationships between the Company, on one hand, and a
directors or immediate family members primary
business affiliation, on the other hand, if the relationship is
in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same
terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable
transactions with similarly situated non-affiliates;
(c) the director or an immediate family member, or their
primary business affiliation, maintains a brokerage, margin or
similar account with, or has purchased investment services,
investment products, securities or similar products and services
from the Company, including ownership of interests in
partnerships or funds sponsored or managed by the Company, if
the relationship is on substantially the same terms as those
prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with
similarly situated non-affiliates;
(d) the director or an immediate family member is a partner
or associate of, or of counsel to, a law firm providing services
to the Company if (i) such person has not personally
provided legal services to the Company, and (ii) the
aggregate payments received by the law firm from the Company in
any fiscal year do not exceed the greater of $1 million or
2% of the law firms consolidated gross revenues for that
fiscal year;
(e) a relationship arising solely from a directors or
an immediate family members ownership of an equity or
limited partnership interest in an entity that engages in a
transaction with the Company, if the directors or
immediate family members ownership interest does not
exceed 5% of the total equity or partnership interests in that
other entity;
(f) a relationship arising solely from a directors
position as a director of another company that provides services
to, or is provided services by, the Company;
(g) a relationship arising solely because an immediate
family member of the director is a director or employee of
another company that provides services to, or is provided
services by, the Company;
(h) the director or an immediate family member has received
personal loans from the Company that are specifically permitted
under Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and any
regulations adopted thereunder; and
(i) the director or an immediate family member is a
director, trustee or executive officer of a foundation,
university or other non-profit organization that receives from
the Company or the Piper Jaffray Foundation charitable
contributions in an amount that does not exceed the greater of
$100,000 or 5% of the organizations aggregate annual
charitable receipts during its preceding fiscal year.
A-2
APPENDIX B
PIPER JAFFRAY COMPANIES
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
As Amended by the Board of Directors
on December 9, 2004
The Audit Committee (the Committee) is established
pursuant to the Bylaws of Piper Jaffray Companies (the
Company). The purpose of the Committee is to oversee
(1) the independent auditors qualifications and
independence, (2) the integrity of the Companys
financial statements, (3) the performance of the
Companys internal audit function and independent auditor
and (4) the Companys compliance with legal and
regulatory requirements, and to prepare an audit committee
report for inclusion in the Companys proxy statement for
its annual shareholders meeting.
The Committee shall consist of three or more members of the
Board appointed from time to time by the Board. All of the
members of the Committee shall be non-employee directors who
meet the independence and experience requirements of the New
York Stock Exchange (NYSE), Section 10A(m)(3)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC). Each of the members
of the Committee shall be financially literate or shall become
so within a reasonable period of time after his or her
appointment to the Committee. At least one member of the
Committee shall be an audit committee financial
expert as defined by SEC rules. The Committee Chairperson
shall be appointed by the Board. The Committee may appoint a
Secretary, who need not be a director. Committee members are
subject to removal at any time by a majority of the Board. Any
resulting vacancy may be filled by the Board.
The Committee shall meet as often as it determines, but not less
frequently than quarterly. The Committee may request any officer
or employee of the Company or external legal, accounting or
other advisors to attend a meeting of the Committee or to meet
with any members of, or consultants to, the Committee. In
addition, the Committee shall have such other direct and
independent interaction with management, the internal auditor
and the independent auditor from time to time as the members of
the Committee deem appropriate.
|
|
IV. |
Resources and Authority |
The Committee shall have the resources and authority appropriate
to discharge its responsibilities, including the authority to
use internal personnel and to obtain advice and assistance from
internal or external legal, accounting, tax or other advisors
and the funding to compensate any such external advisors. In
addition, the Committee shall have sole authority to retain and
terminate the independent auditor (subject to shareholder
ratification, if such ratification is required or sought) and to
approve the fees and other retention terms related to the
appointment of the independent auditor, who shall report
directly to the Committee. It is the sense of the Committee that
the Committee generally will recommend to the Board that the
selection of the independent auditor be submitted to
shareholders for ratification at the annual meeting of
shareholders.
The Committee may delegate its authority to subcommittees
established from time to time by the Committee, which
subcommittees shall consist of one or more members of the
Committee and shall report to the Committee; provided, however,
that in the event the Committee delegates to a subcommittee its
authority to pre-approve audit and permitted non-audit services,
any determination
B-1
by the subcommittee to grant such pre-approvals shall be
presented to the full Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
|
|
V. |
Duties and Responsibilities |
The Committee shall:
|
|
|
Oversee the Relationship with the Independent Auditor |
|
|
|
|
1. |
Appoint, determine the compensation and retention terms for, and
oversee the work of any independent auditor engaged for the
purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing
other audit, review or attest services for the Company. |
|
|
2. |
Resolve disagreements between management and the independent
auditor regarding financial reporting. |
|
|
3. |
At least annually, obtain and review a report by the independent
auditor describing (a) its internal quality-control
procedures, (b) any material issues raised by the most
recent internal quality-control review, or peer review, of the
firm, or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or
professional authorities, within the preceding five years,
respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the
firm, and any steps taken to deal with any such issues, and
(c) all relationships between the independent auditor and
the Company, in order to assess the auditors independence. |
|
|
4. |
Annually receive written notice from the independent auditor
regarding its independence as required in Independence Standards
Board Standard No. 1 and discuss with the independent
auditor its independence. |
|
|
5. |
At least annually, evaluate the qualifications, performance and
independence of the independent auditor, considering
(a) whether the auditors quality controls are
adequate, (b) whether the provision of permitted non-audit
services is compatible with maintaining the auditors
independence, and (c) the opinions of the Companys
management and its internal auditor. The Committee shall present
its conclusions with respect to the independent auditor to the
Board. |
|
|
6. |
Review and evaluate the lead partner of the independent auditor
team. |
|
|
7. |
Ensure the regular rotation of the lead audit partner having
primary responsibility for the audit and the audit partner
responsible for reviewing the audit, as required by law. |
|
|
8. |
Review the Companys hiring policies with respect to
employees and former employees of the independent auditor who
participated in any capacity in the audit of the Company to
ensure such hiring policies do not compromise the independence
of the independent auditor. |
|
|
9. |
Confirm that none of the independent auditors audit
partners earn or receive compensation based on procuring
engagements with the Company for providing products or services,
other than audit review or attest services. |
|
|
|
|
10. |
Meet with the independent auditor prior to the audit to discuss
the planning and staffing of the audit. |
|
|
11. |
Pre-approve all audit and permitted non-audit services
(including the fees and terms thereof) to be performed for the
Company by the independent auditor, subject to the de minimis
exceptions for non-audit services described in
Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Exchange Act that are approved
by the Committee prior to the completion of the audit,
considering whether the provision of any non-audit services is
compatible with maintaining the independent auditors
independence. |
|
|
12. |
Discuss with the independent auditor issues on which the
national office was consulted by the Companys audit team
and matters of audit quality and consistency. |
B-2
|
|
|
Oversee the Integrity of the Companys Financial
Statements and Disclosures |
|
|
|
|
13. |
Meet to review and discuss with management and the independent
auditor the Companys annual audited financial statements,
including reviewing the Companys specific disclosures
under Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and
recommend to the Board whether the annual audited financial
statements should be included in the Companys
Form 10-K. |
|
|
14. |
Meet to review and discuss with management and the independent
auditor the Companys quarterly financial statements,
including reviewing the Companys specific disclosures
under Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, prior to
the filing of the Companys Form 10-Q. |
|
|
15. |
Discuss with management and the independent auditor significant
financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with
the preparation of the Companys financial statements,
including any significant changes in the Companys
selection or application of accounting principles. |
|
|
16. |
Review and discuss with management and the independent auditor
any major issues as to the adequacy of the Companys
internal controls, any special steps adopted in light of
material control deficiencies and the adequacy of disclosures
about changes in internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
17. |
Review and discuss with management (including the senior
internal audit executive) and the independent auditor the
Companys internal controls report and the independent
auditors attestation of the report, prior to the filing of
the Companys Form 10-K. |
|
|
18. |
Review and discuss with the independent auditor (a) all
critical accounting policies and practices to be used;
(b) all alternative treatments of financial information
within generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) that have been discussed with management,
ramifications of the use of such alternative disclosures and
treatments, and the treatment preferred by the independent
auditor; and (c) other material written communications
between the independent auditor and management, such as any
management letter or schedule of unadjusted differences. |
|
|
19. |
Discuss generally with management the types of information to be
disclosed and the types of presentations to be made with respect
to the Companys earnings press releases, including the use
of pro forma or adjusted non-GAAP
information, and any financial information and earnings guidance
provided to analysts and rating agencies. |
|
|
20. |
Discuss with management and the independent auditor the effect
of regulatory and accounting initiatives, as well as off-balance
sheet structures, on the Companys financial statements. |
|
|
21. |
Review disclosures made to the Committee by the Companys
chief executive officer and chief financial officer during their
certification process for the Form 10-K and Forms 10-Q
about any significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls or material weaknesses therein and any fraud
involving management or other employees who play a significant
role in the Companys internal controls. |
|
|
22. |
Discuss with the independent auditor the matters required to be
discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61
relating to the conduct of the audit, and review with the
independent auditor any difficulties encountered in the course
of the audit work, including any restrictions on the scope of
the independent auditors activities or on its access to
requested information, and any significant disagreements with
management, and managements response to such problems or
difficulties. |
B-3
|
|
|
Oversee the Companys Internal Audit Function |
|
|
|
|
23. |
Review the appointment and replacement of the senior internal
audit executive. |
|
|
24. |
Review the significant reports to management prepared by the
internal auditor and managements responses. |
|
|
25. |
Discuss with the independent auditor and management the
responsibilities, budget and staffing of the Companys
internal audit function and the planned scope of the internal
audit. |
|
|
|
Oversee the Companys Compliance with Legal and
Regulatory Requirements |
|
|
|
|
26. |
Obtain from the independent auditor assurance that Section
10A(b) of the Exchange Act has not been implicated. |
|
|
27. |
Annually review the responsibilities, budget and staffing of the
Companys compliance department. |
|
|
28. |
Review the Companys annual report to management regarding
supervisory systems and procedures required by the NYSE. |
|
|
29. |
Annually review the budgeting and expense allocation process
with respect to the Companys investment research
operations to ensure that such budgeting and expense allocation
are performed by senior management of the Company without input
from the Companys investment banking professionals and
without regard to specific revenues or results derived from the
Companys investment banking operations, though revenues
and results of the Company as a whole may be considered in
determining the investment research budget and allocation of
investment research expenses. |
|
|
30. |
Oversee administration of the Companys Code of Ethics and
Business Conduct and, as appropriate, consider and approve any
amendments to, or waivers granted to the Companys
executive officers under, provisions of such Code. |
|
|
31. |
Establish procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of
complaints regarding the Companys accounting, internal
accounting controls or auditing matters, and the confidential,
anonymous submission by Company employees of concerns regarding
questionable accounting or auditing matters. |
|
|
32. |
Discuss with management and the independent auditor any
correspondence with regulators or governmental agencies and any
published reports that raise material issues regarding the
Companys financial statements or accounting policies. |
|
|
33. |
Discuss with the Companys General Counsel legal matters
that may have a material impact on the financial statements or
the Companys compliance with legal or regulatory
requirements. |
|
|
34. |
Produce an annual report for inclusion in the Companys
proxy statement for its annual shareholders meeting, in
accordance with applicable rules and regulations. |
|
|
|
Other Duties and Responsibilities |
|
|
|
|
35. |
Regularly discuss the Companys major financial risk
exposures, the steps management has taken to monitor and control
such exposures, and guidelines and policies to govern the
Companys risk assessment and risk management processes. |
|
|
36. |
Regularly meet with management (including the chief financial
and accounting officer), the internal auditor and the
independent auditor in separate executive sessions. |
|
|
37. |
Annually review and reassess the adequacy of this Charter and
recommend to the Board any proposed changes to this Charter. |
|
|
38. |
Annually review and evaluate the Committees own
performance. |
B-4
|
|
|
|
39. |
Report regularly to the Board on the Committees
activities, specifically including a review of any issues that
arise with respect to the quality or integrity of the
Companys financial statements, the Companys
compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, the
performance and independence of the Companys independent
auditor, or the performance of the Companys internal audit
function. |
VI. Limitation of
Committees Role
The Committee is not responsible for preparing financial
statements, planning or conducting audits, or determining that
the Companys financial statements and disclosures are
complete and accurate and are in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles and applicable legal and other
requirements. These are the responsibilities of management and
the independent auditor.
B-5
LOCATION OF PIPER JAFFRAY COMPANIES ANNUAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS
Wednesday, April 27, 2005, at 3:30 p.m.
Windows on Minnesota
50th Floor, IDS Center
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Beneficial owners of common stock held in street name by a
broker, bank, trust or other nominee may need proof of ownership
to be admitted to the meeting. A recent brokerage statement or
letter from the broker, bank, trust or other nominee are
examples of proof of ownership.
PROXY
SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FOR THE 2005 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
|
The undersigned, having received the Notice of Annual Meeting of
Shareholders and Proxy Statement, revoking any proxy previously given, hereby
appoint(s) Andrew S. Duff, James L. Chosy and Sandra G. Sponem, and any of
them, as proxies to vote as directed all shares the undersigned is (are)
entitled to vote at the Piper Jaffray Companies 2005 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders and authorize(s) each to vote in his or her discretion upon other
business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or
postponement thereof. If this signed proxy card contains no specific voting
instructions, my (our) shares will be voted FOR both nominees for director,
FOR Item 2, and in the discretion of the named proxies on all other matters. |
|
IF YOU DO NOT VOTE BY TOUCH-TONE TELEPHONE OR INTERNET, PLEASE MARK, SIGN
AND DATE THIS PROXY CARD ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND RETURN IT IN THE ENCLOSED
ENVELOPE. |
(Continued on reverse side)
Address Change/Comments (Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side)
|
|
|
/\ FOLD AND DETACH HERE
/\ |
You can now access your Piper Jaffray Companies account online.
Access your Piper Jaffray Companies shareholder account online via Investor ServiceDirect® (ISD).
Mellon Investor Services LLC, transfer agent for Piper Jaffray Companies, now makes it easy and
convenient to get current information on your shareholder account.
|
|
|
|
|
|
View account status
|
|
View payment history for dividends |
|
|
View certificate history
|
|
Make address changes |
|
|
View book-entry information
|
|
Obtain a duplicate 1099 tax return |
|
|
|
|
Establish/change your PIN |
|
Visit us on the Web at http://www.melloninvestor.com
For technical information call 1-877-978-7778 between 9am-7pm
Monday-Friday Eastern Time
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Items 1 and 2. |
|
Please
Mark Here for Address Change or Comments SEE REVERSE SIDE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR ALL
|
|
WITHHOLD |
ITEM 1.
|
|
Election of Class II Directors to serve until the
annual meeting in 2008.
|
|
(except as
specified below
|
|
AUTHORITY
to vote for all |
|
|
|
Nominees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
01 Michael R. Francis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02 Addison L. Piper
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To withhold authority to vote for either nominee, write the
number of the nominee in the space provided below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAIN |
ITEM 2. |
|
Ratify selection of Ernst & Young LLP
as independent auditor for 2005.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING |
o |
Choose MLinksm for fast, easy and secure 24/7 online access to your
future proxy materials, investment plan statements, tax documents and more. Simply log on to
Investor ServiceDirect® at www.melloninvestor.com/isd where step-by step instructions will
prompt you through enrollment.
NOTE: Please sign as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as
attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, or on behalf of a corporation or
partnership as an authorized officer, please give full title as such.
|
/\
FOLD AND DETACH HERE /\ |
Vote by Internet or Telephone or Mail
24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week
Internet and telephone voting is available through 11:59 PM Eastern Time
the day prior to annual meeting day.
Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner
as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.
Internet
http://www.proxyvoting.com/pjc
Use the Internet to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you access
the Web site. |
OR |
|
Telephone1-866-540-5760
Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you call. |
|
OR |
Mail
Mark, sign and date your proxy
card and return it in the
enclosed postage-paid
envelope. |
If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone,
you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.
You can view the Annual Report and Proxy Statement
on the Internet at www.piperjaffray.com