def14a
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO.)
Filed by the Registrant R
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant £
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
£
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
£
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
R
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
£
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
£
|
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Encore
Acquisition Company
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
|
|
|
|
|
R |
|
No fee required. |
|
|
|
|
|
£ |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£ |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
|
|
£ |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ENCORE
ACQUISITION COMPANY
777 Main Street
Suite 1400
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
To the Stockholders of Encore Acquisition Company:
Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
of Encore Acquisition Company (the Company) will be
held at the Fort Worth Petroleum Club, 777 Main Street,
39th Floor, Fort Worth, Texas 76102, on Tuesday,
May 2, 2006, at 9:00 a.m., Fort Worth time. The
annual meeting is being held for the following purposes:
(1) to elect eight directors, each for a term of one year;
(2) to ratify the appointment of the independent registered
public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2006; and
(3) to transact such other business as may properly come
before the meeting.
These proposals are described in the accompanying proxy
materials. You will be able to vote at the annual meeting only
if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on
March 15, 2006.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
L. Ben Nivens
Corporate Secretary
Fort Worth, Texas
March 28, 2006
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
Please sign, date and return the enclosed proxy promptly to
ensure that your shares are voted in accordance with your wishes
and a quorum is present at the annual meeting. Instead of
returning the paper proxy, you may vote by telephone at
1-866-540-5760 or over the Internet by accessing
http://www.proxyvoting.com/eac. To do so by either method, you
will need the control numbers that are printed on your
personalized proxy card or voting instruction card.
ENCORE
ACQUISITION COMPANY
777 Main Street
Suite 1400
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
PROXY
STATEMENT
2006 ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
May 2, 2006
The Board of Directors (the Board) of Encore
Acquisition Company (the Company) is providing these
proxy materials in connection with the Companys annual
meeting of stockholders that will be held at the Fort Worth
Petroleum Club, 777 Main Street, 39th Floor,
Fort Worth, Texas 76102, on Tuesday, May 2, 2006, at
9:00 a.m., Fort Worth time. Stockholders of record as
of March 15, 2006, which is the record date established for
the annual meeting by the Board, are entitled and requested to
vote on the items of business described in this proxy statement.
Each stockholder of record is entitled to one vote for each
share registered in the stockholders name. As of the
record date, 49,766,021 shares of the Companys common
stock were entitled to be voted at the annual meeting.
This proxy statement and the accompanying notice of annual
meeting and proxy will first be sent or given to stockholders of
the Company on or about April 4, 2006.
Voting
Procedures
You may vote your shares in person at the annual meeting, by
Internet, by telephone or by mail.
Voting in Person. Shares held in your name as
the stockholder of record may be voted in person at the annual
meeting. If your shares are held in the name of a broker,
trustee or another nominee (street name), you may
vote the shares in person at the annual meeting only if you
obtain a legal proxy from the broker, trustee or nominee that
holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares.
Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting, we recommend
that you also submit your proxy or voting instructions as
described below so that your vote will be counted if you later
decide not to attend the meeting.
Voting by Internet. Stockholders of record of
the Companys common stock with Internet access may submit
proxies by following the Vote by Internet
instructions on their proxy cards. Most stockholders who hold
shares beneficially in street name may vote by accessing the
website specified on the voting instruction cards provided by
their brokers, trustee or nominees. Please check the voting
instruction card for Internet voting availability.
Voting by Telephone. Stockholders of record of
the Companys common stock may submit proxies by following
the Vote by Phone instructions on their proxy cards.
Most stockholders who hold shares beneficially in street name
may vote by phone by calling the number specified on the voting
instruction cards provided by their brokers, trustee or
nominees. Please check the voting instruction card for telephone
voting availability.
Voting by Mail. Stockholders of record of the
Companys common stock may submit proxies by completing,
signing and dating their proxy cards and mailing them in the
accompanying pre-addressed envelopes. Stockholders who hold
shares beneficially in street name may vote by mail by
completing, signing and dating the voting instruction cards
provided and mailing them in the accompanying pre-addressed
envelopes.
Changing
Your Vote
You may change your vote at any time prior to the vote at the
annual meeting, except that votes submitted through the Internet
or telephone must be received by 11:59 p.m., New York time,
on May 1, 2006. If you are the stockholder of record, you
may change your vote by granting a new proxy bearing a later
date (which automatically revokes the earlier proxy), by
providing a written notice of revocation to the Companys
Corporate Secretary prior to your shares being voted, or by
attending the annual meeting and voting in person. Attendance at
the meeting will not cause your previously granted proxy to be
revoked unless you specifically so request. For shares you hold
beneficially in street name, you may change your vote by
submitting new voting instructions to your broker, trustee
or nominee, or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from your
broker or nominee giving you the right to vote your shares, by
attending the meeting and voting in person.
Quorum
and Adjournments
The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a
majority of the votes eligible to be cast at the annual meeting
is necessary to constitute a quorum at the annual meeting. Both
abstentions and broker non-votes (described below) are counted
for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum. If a
quorum is not present, the stockholders entitled to vote who are
present in person or by proxy at the annual meeting have the
power to adjourn the annual meeting from time to time, without
notice other than an announcement at the annual meeting, until a
quorum is present. At any adjourned annual meeting at which a
quorum is present, any business may be transacted that might
have been transacted at the annual meeting as originally
notified.
Required
Vote; Effect of Broker Non-Votes and Abstentions
The nominees for election as directors at the annual meeting who
receive the highest number of FOR votes will be
elected as directors. This is called plurality voting. The
ratification of the appointment of the Companys
independent registered public accounting firm requires the
affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the annual
meeting.
In February 2006, the Board amended the Companys Corporate
Governance Guidelines to require any nominee for director who
receives a greater number of votes WITHHELD from his
election than votes FOR such election to promptly
tender his resignation from the Board following certification of
the stockholder vote. The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee shall consider the resignation and recommend to the
Board whether to accept it. The Boards decision to accept
or reject the resignation will be made within 90 days of
the certification of the stockholder vote.
In the election of directors, you may vote FOR all
or some of the nominees or your vote may be WITHHELD
with respect to one or more of the nominees. For the other items
of business, you may vote FOR, AGAINST
or ABSTAIN. If you elect to ABSTAIN, the
abstention has the same effect as a vote AGAINST. If
you provide specific instructions with regard to certain items,
your shares will be voted as you instruct on such items. If you
sign your proxy card or voting instruction card without giving
specific instructions, your shares will be voted in accordance
with the recommendations of the Board set forth below under
Board Recommendation.
Brokers holding shares must vote according to specific
instructions they receive from the beneficial owners of those
shares. If specific instructions are not received, brokers may
generally vote the shares in their discretion. However, the New
York Stock Exchange precludes brokers from exercising voting
discretion on certain proposals without specific instructions
from the beneficial owner. Under the rules of the New York Stock
Exchange, brokers will have discretion to vote on all items
scheduled to be presented at the annual meeting.
A broker non-vote has the effect of a negative vote when a
majority of the issued and outstanding shares is required for
approval of a particular proposal and has no effect when a
majority of the shares present in person or by proxy and
entitled to vote or a plurality or majority of the votes cast is
required for approval. Since directors are elected by a
plurality and the ratification of the appointment of the
independent registered public accounting firm requires the
affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast, broker
non-votes will not affect the outcome of voting on those
proposals.
Because abstentions are considered votes cast on a
proposal, abstentions will have the same effect as votes against
the ratification of the appointment of the Companys
independent registered public accounting firm.
2
Board
Recommendation
The Board recommends that you vote:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR the election of the eight persons named in this proxy
statement as nominees for election to the Board. If any nominee
becomes unable or unwilling to accept nomination or election,
the persons acting under proxy will vote for the election of a
substitute nominee that the Board recommends.
|
|
|
|
FOR the ratification of the appointment of
Ernst & Young LLP as the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm.
|
Voting on
Other Matters
If any other business properly comes before the stockholders for
a vote at the meeting, your shares will be voted in accordance
with the discretion of the proxy holders, I. Jon Brumley, Jon S.
Brumley and L. Ben Nivens. The Board knows of no matters, other
than those described above, to be presented for consideration at
the annual meeting.
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES AND BOARD MATTERS
The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
for directors, officers (including the Companys principal
executive officer, principal financial officer and principal
accounting officer) and employees. The Company also has adopted
Corporate Governance Guidelines, which, in conjunction with the
Companys certificate of incorporation, bylaws and Board
committee charters, form the framework for governance of the
Company. The Companys Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
and Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on the
Corporate Governance section of the Companys
website at www.encoreacq.com. The Company will post on its
website any amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics or waivers of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for
directors and executive officers.
Stockholders may request free printed copies of the Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics and the Corporate Governance
Guidelines from:
Encore
Acquisition Company
Attention: Corporate Secretary
777 Main Street, Suite 1400
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
(817) 877-9955
Director
Independence
The Board has determined that each director nominee is
independent, as defined for purposes of the listing standards of
the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE), other than
Mr. I. Jon Brumley, who is Chairman of the Board, and
Mr. Jon S. Brumley, who is Chief Executive Officer and
President of the Company. In making this determination, the
Board affirmatively determined that each independent director or
nominee had no material relationship with the Company (either
directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an
organization that has a relationship with the Company), and that
none of the express disqualifications contained in the NYSE
rules applied to any of them.
As contemplated by NYSE rules, the Board has adopted categorical
standards to assist it in making independence determinations,
under which relationships that fall within the categorical
standards are not required to be disclosed in the proxy
statement and their impact on independence need not be
separately discussed. The Board, however, considers all material
relationships with each director in making its independence
determinations. A relationship falls within the categorical
standards if it:
|
|
|
|
|
Is a type of relationship addressed in Item 404 of
Regulation S-K
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act) or Section 303A.02(b) of the NYSE Listed Company
Manual, but under those rules neither requires disclosure nor
precludes a determination of independence; or
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Consists of charitable contributions by the Company to an
organization where a director is an executive officer and does
not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of the
organizations gross revenue in any of the last
3 years.
|
None of the independent director nominees had relationships
relevant to an independence determination that were outside the
scope of the Boards categorical standards.
Board
Structure and Committee Composition
As of the date of this proxy statement, the Board has seven
directors and the following three committees: (1) Audit,
(2) Compensation, and (3) Nominating and Corporate
Governance. The committee membership and meetings during the
last fiscal year and the function of each of the committees are
described below. Each of the committees operates under a written
charter adopted by the Board. All of the committee charters are
available on the Corporate Governance section of the
Companys website at www.encoreacq.com.
Composition
of Board Committees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominating and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
Name of Director
|
|
Audit
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Governance
|
|
Martin C. Bowen
|
|
Member
|
|
|
|
|
Ted Collins, Jr.
|
|
|
|
Member
|
|
Chair
|
Ted A. Gardner
|
|
Chair
|
|
|
|
|
John V. Genova
|
|
Member
|
|
|
|
|
James A. Winne III
|
|
|
|
Chair
|
|
Member
|
The Audit Committee held eight meetings in 2005; the
Compensation Committee held three meetings and acted by
unanimous written consent on one occasion in 2005; and the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held one meeting
in 2005. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met
in February 2006 in connection with matters related to the
annual meeting.
The Board held eight meetings in fiscal 2005. Each director
attended at least 75% of all Board and applicable committee
meetings in 2005. Directors are encouraged to attend annual
meetings of the Companys stockholders. All of the
Companys directors attended the 2005 annual meeting of
stockholders.
Audit Committee. The Audit Committees
purpose is, among other things, to assist the Board in
overseeing:
|
|
|
|
|
the integrity of the Companys financial statements;
|
|
|
|
the Companys compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements;
|
|
|
|
the independence, qualifications and performance of the
Companys independent registered public accounting
firm; and
|
|
|
|
the performance of the Companys internal audit function.
|
The Board has determined that all three members of the Audit
Committee are independent under the listing standards of the
NYSE and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In
addition, the Board has determined that Mr. Gardner is an
audit committee financial expert as such term is
defined in Item 401(h) of
Regulation S-K
under the Exchange Act.
The report of the Audit Committee is included in this proxy
statement on page 23. The charter of the Audit Committee is
available on the Corporate Governance section of the
Companys website at www.encoreacq.com. A free printed copy
also is available to any stockholder who requests it from the
address on page 3.
Compensation Committee. The Compensation
Committees functions include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
review and approve corporate goals and objectives relevant to
chief executive officer compensation, evaluate the chief
executive officers performance in light of those goals and
objectives, and, either as a committee or
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
together with the other independent directors (as directed by
the Board), determine and approve the chief executive
officers compensation level based on this evaluation;
|
|
|
|
|
|
approve, or make recommendations to the Board with respect to,
the compensation of other executive officers;
|
|
|
|
from time to time consider and take action on the establishment
of and changes to incentive compensation plans and equity-based
compensation plans, including making recommendations to the
Board on plans, goals or amendments to be submitted for action
by the Companys stockholders;
|
|
|
|
administer the Companys compensation plans that it is
assigned responsibility to administer, including taking action
on grants and awards, determinations with respect to achievement
of performance goals, and other matters provided in the
respective plans;
|
|
|
|
review from time to time when and as it deems appropriate the
compensation and benefits of non-employee directors, including
compensation pursuant to equity-based plans, and approve, or
recommend to the Board for its action, any changes in such
compensation and benefits; and
|
|
|
|
produce a compensation committee report on executive
compensation as required by the Securities and Exchange
Commission to be included in the Companys annual proxy
statement or annual report on
Form 10-K.
|
The Board has determined that both members of the Compensation
Committee are independent under the listing standards of the
NYSE.
The report of the Compensation Committee is included in this
proxy statement on page 18. The charter of the Compensation
Committee is available on the Corporate Governance
section of the Companys website at www.encoreacq.com. A
free printed copy also is available to any stockholder who
requests it from the address on page 3.
Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committees functions include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
identify individuals qualified to become Board members,
consistent with criteria approved by the Board;
|
|
|
|
recommend to the Board a slate of director nominees to be
elected by the stockholders at the next annual meeting of
stockholders and, when appropriate, director appointees to take
office between annual meetings;
|
|
|
|
develop and recommend to the Board the corporate governance
guidelines applicable to the Company;
|
|
|
|
oversee the Boards annual evaluation of its performance of
the Board and management; and
|
|
|
|
recommend to the Board membership on standing Board committees.
|
The Board has determined that both members of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee are independent under the listing
standards of the NYSE.
The charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
is available on the Corporate Governance section of
the Companys website at www.encoreacq.com. A free printed
copy also is available to any stockholder who requests it from
the address on page 3.
5
Selection
of Nominees for the Board
Identifying
Candidates
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee solicits ideas
for potential Board candidates from a number of sources,
including members of the Board, executive officers of the
Company, individuals personally known to the members of the
Board and research. The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee also has sole authority to select and compensate a
third-party executive search firm to help identify candidates,
if it deems advisable. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee will consider candidates for the Board
submitted by stockholders. Any stockholder submission should
include the candidates name and qualifications for Board
membership and should be directed to:
Encore
Acquisition Company
Attention: Corporate Secretary
777 Main Street, Suite 1400
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does
not require the stockholder to submit any particular information
regarding the qualifications of the stockholders
candidate, the level of consideration that the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee will give to the
stockholders candidate will be commensurate with the
quality and quantity of information about the candidate that the
nominating stockholder makes available to the committee. The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider all
candidates identified through the processes described above, and
will evaluate each of them on the same basis.
In addition, the Companys bylaws permit stockholders to
nominate directors for election at an annual meeting of
stockholders whether or not such nominee is submitted to and
evaluated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
To nominate a director using this process, the stockholder must
follow the procedures described under Stockholder
Proposals below.
Evaluating
Candidates
Each director candidate must meet certain minimum
qualifications, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the ability to represent the interests of all stockholders of
the Company and not just one particular constituency;
|
|
|
|
independence of thought and judgment;
|
|
|
|
the ability to dedicate sufficient time, energy and attention to
the performance of his or her duties, taking into consideration
the nominees service on other public company boards;
|
|
|
|
skills and expertise complementary to the existing Board
members skills; and
|
|
|
|
a high degree of personal and professional integrity.
|
In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
considers other qualities that it may deem to be desirable from
time to time, such as the extent to which the candidate
contributes to the diversity of the Board with
diversity being construed broadly to include a variety of
perspectives, opinions, experiences and backgrounds. The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also consider
the ability of the candidate to work with the then-existing
interpersonal dynamics of the Board and his or her ability to
contribute to the collaborative culture among Board members.
Based on this initial evaluation, the Chairman of the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee may interview the candidate,
and if warranted, recommend that one or more members of the
committee, other members of the Board and executives, as
appropriate, interview the candidate in person or by telephone.
After completing this evaluation and interview process, the
committee will make a recommendation to the full Board as to the
persons who should be nominated by the Board, and the Board will
determine the nominees after considering the recommendation of
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
6
Compensation
of Directors
The following table provides information on the Companys
compensation and reimbursement practices for non-employee
directors. At a meeting in February 2006, the Board increased
director compensation to the amounts shown below under the
column headed Fiscal 2006. Neither Mr. I. Jon
Brumley nor Mr. Jon S. Brumley receive any compensation for
Board activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006
|
|
Fiscal 2005
|
|
Annual Retainer
|
|
$50,000
|
|
$40,000
|
Additional Retainer for Chair of
Audit Committee
|
|
$10,000
|
|
$10,000
|
Additional Retainer for Chair of
Compensation Committee
|
|
$10,000
|
|
$0
|
Additional Retainer for Chair of
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
|
|
$10,000
|
|
$0
|
Additional fee for attendance at
Board meetings
|
|
$2,000
|
|
$2,000
|
Additional fee for attendance at
committee meetings
|
|
$1,000
|
|
$1,000
|
Equity-based compensation
|
|
5,000 shares of restricted
stock issued upon the directors election or reelection to
the
Board(1)
|
|
4,500 shares of restricted
stock issued upon the directors election or reelection to
the Board(2)(3)
|
Reimbursement of expenses
attendant to Board membership
|
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shares of restricted stock granted in fiscal 2006 will vest in
four equal annual installments beginning on the first
anniversary of the date of grant, subject to earlier vesting in
the event of a change in control, death or disability and to
such other terms as are set forth in the award agreement. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects the Companys
three-for-two
stock split in July 2005. |
|
(3) |
|
Shares of restricted stock granted in fiscal 2005 vest in three
equal annual installments beginning three years from the date of
grant, subject to earlier vesting in the event of a change in
control, death or disability and to such other terms as are set
forth in the award agreement. |
Executive
Sessions
The Companys non-management directors include all
directors other than I. Jon Brumley and Jon S. Brumley. Each of
the non-management directors is also independent
under the listing standards of the NYSE. The non-management
directors meet in executive session without management
participation at least three times per year. These meetings are
chaired on a rotating basis by the chairmen of the Audit
Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee.
Stockholder
Communications
Individuals may communicate with the entire Board or with the
Companys non-management directors. Any such communication
should be sent via letter addressed to the member or members of
the Board to whom the communication is directed, care of the
Companys Corporate Secretary, Encore Acquisition Company,
777 Main Street, Suite 1400, Fort Worth, Texas 76102.
All such communications, other than unsolicited commercial
solicitations or communications, will be forwarded to the
appropriate director or directors for review.
7
PROPOSALS TO
BE VOTED ON
PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
There are eight nominees for election to our Board this year.
All of the nominees have served as directors since the last
annual meeting, other than Mr. John A. Bailey. Information
regarding the business experience of each nominee is provided
below. Each director is elected annually to serve until the next
annual meeting or until his successor is elected.
Mr. Bailey was recommended as a director nominee for
consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee by Mr. I. Jon Brumley, the Companys
Chairman of the Board, and Mr. Jon S. Brumley, the
Companys Chief Executive Officer and President.
If you sign your proxy or voting instruction card but do not
give instructions with respect to voting for directors, your
shares will be voted for the eight persons recommended by the
Board. If you wish to give specific instructions with respect to
voting for directors, you may do so by indicating your
instructions on your proxy or voting instruction card.
All of the nominees have indicated to the Company that they will
be available to serve as directors. In the event that any
nominee should become unavailable, however, the proxy holders,
I. Jon Brumley, Jon S. Brumley and L. Ben Nivens, will vote
for a nominee or nominees designated by the Board, unless the
Board chooses to reduce the number of directors serving on the
Board.
Required
Vote
The eight nominees for director who receive the highest number
of FOR votes cast in person or by proxy at the
annual meeting will be elected as directors.
In February 2006, the Board amended the Companys Corporate
Governance Guidelines to require any nominee for director who
receives a greater number of votes WITHHELD from his
election than votes FOR such election to promptly
tender his resignation from the Board following certification of
the stockholder vote. The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee shall consider the resignation and recommend to the
Board whether to accept it. The Boards decision to accept
or reject the resignation will be made within 90 days of
the certification of the stockholder vote.
Board
Recommendation
The Board recommends a vote FOR the election of each of
the following nominees:
|
|
|
I. Jon Brumley
Age 67
|
|
Mr. I. Jon Brumley has been
Chairman of the Board of the Company since its inception in
April 1998. He also served as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company from its inception until December 2005 and President of
the Company from its inception until August 2002. Beginning in
August 1996, Mr. Brumley served as Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of MESA Petroleum (an independent oil and gas
company) until MESAs merger in August 1997 with
Parker & Parsley to form Pioneer Natural Resources
Company (an independent oil and gas company). He served as
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Pioneer until joining
the Company in 1998. Mr. Brumley has also served as
Chairman of XTO Energy, Inc. and President and Chief Executive
Officer of Southland Royalty Company. Mr. Brumley serves as
a director of Hanover Compressor Company. Mr. Brumley
received a Bachelor of Business Administration from the
University of Texas and a Master of Business Administration from
the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School of Business. He is
the father of Jon S. Brumley.
|
8
|
|
|
Jon S. Brumley
Age 35
|
|
Mr. Jon S. Brumley has been Chief
Executive Officer of the Company since January 2006, President
of the Company since August 2002 and a director of the Company
since November 2001. He also held the positions of Executive
Vice President Business Development and
Corporate Secretary from inception in April 1998 until August
2002 and was a director of the Company from April 1999 until May
2001. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Brumley held the
position of Manager of Commodity Risk and Commercial Projects
for Pioneer Natural Resources Company. He was with Pioneer since
its creation by the merger of MESA and Parker & Parsley
in August 1997. Prior to August 1997, Mr. Brumley served as
Director Business Development for MESA. Mr.
Brumley received a Bachelor of Business Administration in
Marketing from the University of Texas. He is the son of I. Jon
Brumley.
|
John A. Bailey
Age 36
|
|
Mr. Bailey, currently a private
investor in the energy sector, is a founding director and
stockholder of CrossPoint Energy, LLC (a private oil and gas
company). Mr. Bailey was a consultant to Amaranth Group LLC
(a multi-strategy investment fund) from October 2004 until March
2005 and employed as Vice President, Energy at Amaranth Group
LLC from March 2005 until March 2006. From October 2000 until
August 2004, Mr. Bailey was an equity research analyst and
Vice President of Equity Research for Deutsche Bank Securities
with a focus on the North American exploration and production
segment of the energy industry. From May 1997 until October
2000, Mr. Bailey was part of the oil and gas equity
research group at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc.
Mr. Bailey received Bachelor of Arts degrees in Economics
and Government from Cornell University.
|
Martin C. Bowen
Age 62
|
|
Mr. Bowen has been a director of
the Company since May 2004. Since 1993, Mr. Bowen has been
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Fine Line, Inc., a
private holding company. He also serves on the Board of
Directors of AZZ, Inc. and several privately held companies. In
addition, he is a Director and Executive Committee Member of the
Southwestern Exposition and Livestock Show, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Performing Arts Fort Worth and a
Council Member of the World Wildlife Fund. Mr. Bowen
received a Bachelor of Business Administration in Finance from
Texas A&M University, a Bachelor of Foreign Trade from the
American Graduate School of International Management and a J.D.
from Baylor University School of Law.
|
Ted Collins, Jr.
Age 67
|
|
Mr. Collins has been a director of
the Company since May 2001. From 1988 to July 2000, he was a
co-founder and president of Collins & Ware, Inc. (an
independent oil and gas exploration company which was sold in
July 2000). Since that time he has engaged in private oil and
gas investments. Mr. Collins is a past President of the
Permian Basin Petroleum Association, the Permian Basin
Landmens Association, Midland Petroleum Club and serves as
Chairman of the Midland Wildcat Committee. He is a graduate of
the University of Oklahoma with a Bachelor of Science in
Geological Engineering. Mr. Collins serves on the Board of
Directors of Hanover Compressor Company and Energy Transfer
Partners, L.L.C., the general partner of the general partner of
Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. Mr. Collins in also an
active board member on the Midland Metropolitan YMCA and the
University of Texas Development Board.
|
9
|
|
|
Ted A. Gardner
Age 48
|
|
Mr. Gardner has been a director of
the Company since May 2001. Mr. Gardner has been Managing
Partner of Silverhawk Capital Partners (a private equity
investment group) since June 2005. From June 2003 to June 2005,
Mr. Gardner was an independent investor. Mr. Gardner was a
Managing Partner of Wachovia Capital Partners (a private equity
investment group) and a Senior Vice President of Wachovia
Corporation (a provider of commercial and retail banking and
trust services) from 1990 until 2003. Mr. Gardner received
a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from Duke University and
a J.D. and Masters of Business Administration from the
University of Virginia. He currently serves on the Board of
Directors of Kinder Morgan, Inc. and COMSYS IT Partners Inc.
|
John V. Genova
Age 51
|
|
Mr. Genova has been a director of
the Company since May 2004. Mr. Genova has been Vice
President of Corporate Planning for Tesoro Corporation (an
independent petroleum refiner) since March 2006. From July 2005
to March 2006, Mr. Genova was Vice President of Performance
Management for Tesoro Corporation. From January 2005 to July
2005, Mr. Genova was an independent consultant to the
energy industry. Previously, Mr. Genova was Executive Vice
President Refining and Marketing of Holly
Corporation (an independent U.S. petroleum refiner) from
January 2004 to December 2004. Prior to Holly, Mr. Genova
worked over 27 years with ExxonMobil. From January 1999 to
December 1999, he served as Vice President of the Gas Department
of Exxon Company, International. From December 1999 to March
2002, he served as Director of International Gas Marketing of
ExxonMobil International Limited in London. From April 2002
through 2003, Mr. Genova served as Executive Assistant to the
Chairman and General Manager, Corporate Planning of ExxonMobil
Corporation. Mr. Genova received a Bachelor of Science
degree in Chemical and Petroleum Refining Engineering from the
Colorado School of Mines.
|
James A. Winne III
Age 54
|
|
Mr. Winne has been a director of
the Company since May 2001. He has been President and Chief
Executive Officer of Legend Natural Gas II, L.P. (an
independent oil and gas company) since its inception in
September 2004. In addition, Mr. Winne has been President
and Chief Executive Officer of Legend Natural Gas, L.P. (an
independent oil and gas company) since its inception in
September 2001. Mr. Winne was a director of
Belden & Blake Corporation (an independent oil and gas
company) from September 2004 until August 2005 and served as
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
Belden & Blake from December 2004 until August 2005.
From March 2001 until September 2001, Mr. Winne developed
plans for a business that became Legend Natural Gas. He formerly
was employed by North Central Oil Corporation (an independent
oil and gas company) for 18 years and was President and CEO
from September 1993 until March 2001. After attending the
University of Houston, he started his career as an independent
landman and also worked at Tomlinson Interest, Inc. (an
independent oil and gas company) and Longhorn Oil and Gas (an
independent oil and gas company) before joining North
Centrals land department in January 1983. Mr. Winne is a
registered land professional with 27 years of experience in
the oil and gas industry.
|
10
PROPOSAL NO. 2
RATIFICATION
OF THE APPOINTMENT OF
THE
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee of the Board has appointed Ernst &
Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm
to audit the Companys consolidated financial statements as
of and for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 and the
Companys internal control over financial reporting. During
fiscal 2005, Ernst & Young LLP served as the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm and
also provided certain tax and other audit-related services.
Please read Principal Accountant Fees and Services
on page 25. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP
are expected to attend the annual meeting, where they will be
available to respond to appropriate questions and, if they
desire, to make a statement.
Required
Vote
Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as
the Companys independent registered public accounting firm
for fiscal 2006 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of
the votes cast on the proposal at the annual meeting. If the
appointment is not ratified, the Board will consider whether it
should select another independent registered public accounting
firm.
Board
Recommendation
Our Board recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the
appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Companys
independent registered public accounting firm for the 2006
fiscal year.
11
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information as of
March 15, 2006, regarding the ownership of the
Companys common stock by:
|
|
|
|
|
all persons known by the Company to be beneficial owners of more
than five percent of the Companys stock;
|
|
|
|
each director nominee;
|
|
|
|
each of the Companys named executive officers; and
|
|
|
|
all directors and named executive officers of the Company as a
group.
|
Unless otherwise noted, the persons named below have sole voting
and investment power with respect to such shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial
Owner
|
|
Owned(1)(2)
|
|
|
Class
|
|
|
FMR Corp.(3)
|
|
|
6,070,508
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neuberger Berman Inc.(4)
|
|
|
5,227,979
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
605 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baron Capital Group, Inc.(5)
|
|
|
4,885,727
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
767 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(6)
|
|
|
4,744,100
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
100 East Pratt Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wellington Management Company,
LLP(7)
|
|
|
3,835,850
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
75 State Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Jon Brumley(8)
|
|
|
3,097,810
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
Jon S. Brumley
|
|
|
791,539
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
Thomas H. Olle
|
|
|
87,548
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert S. Jacobs
|
|
|
168,597
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Donald P. Gann, Jr.
|
|
|
162,099
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Roy W. Jageman
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
John A. Bailey
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Martin C. Bowen
|
|
|
9,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Ted Collins, Jr.
|
|
|
121,250
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Ted A. Gardner
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
John V. Genova
|
|
|
9,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
James A. Winne III
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Ronald Baron(5)
|
|
|
4,885,727
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
All directors and named executive
officers as a group (12 persons)
|
|
|
4,487,843
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1%. |
|
(1) |
|
Reflects the Companys
three-for-two
stock split effected in the form of a stock dividend in July
2005. Includes common stock for which the indicated owner has
sole or shared voting or investment power. |
12
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Includes options that are or become exercisable within
60 days of March 15, 2006 as follows: Mr. I. Jon
Brumley (297,242), Mr. Jon S. Brumley (250,299),
Mr. Olle (54,580), Mr. Jacobs (45,866), Mr. Gann
(98,751), Mr. Bowen (5,000), Mr. Collins (15,500), Mr.
Gardner (12,500), Mr. Genova (5,000) and Mr. Winne
(15,500), and all directors and named executive officers as a
group (800,238) upon the exercise of stock options granted
pursuant to the Companys 2000 Incentive Stock Plan. |
|
(3) |
|
Based on an amendment to Schedule 13G filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2006 by
FMR Corp. and Edward C. Johnson 3d, chairman of FMR Corp. Such
filing indicates that FMR Corp. has sole voting power with
respect to 881,450 shares and sole dispositive power with
respect to 6,070,508 shares. Fidelity Management &
Research Company (Fidelity), an investment advisor
and wholly owned subsidiary of FMR Corp., is the beneficial
owner of 5,424,108 shares as a result of acting as
investment adviser to various investment companies. Edward C.
Johnson 3d and FMR Corp., through its control of Fidelity and
the funds, each has sole power to dispose of
5,424,108 shares. Fidelity Management Trust Company
(Fidelity Management), a wholly owned subsidiary of
FMR Corp., is the beneficial owner of 646,400 shares as a
result of its serving as investment manager of the institutional
account(s). Edward C. Johnson 3d and FMR Corp., through its
control of Fidelity Management, each has sole voting and
dispositive power over 646,400 shares. |
|
(4) |
|
Based on an amendment to Schedule 13G filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 21, 2006 by
Neuberger Berman Inc. (Neuberger Inc.), Neuberger
Berman, LLC (Neuberger LLC), Neuberger Berman
Management Inc. (Neuberger Management) and Neuberger
Berman Equity Funds (Neuberger Funds). Such filing
indicates that (a) Neuberger Inc. has sole voting power
with respect to 39,900 shares, shared voting power with
respect to 4,114,950 shares and shared dispositive power
with respect to 5,227,979 shares, (b) Neuberger LLC
has sole voting power with respect to 39,900 shares, shared
voting power with respect to 4,114,950 shares and shared
dispositive power with respect to 5,227,979 shares,
(c) Neuberger Management has shared voting and dispositive
power with respect to 4,114,950 shares, and
(d) Neuberger Funds has shared voting and dispositive power
with respect to 3,994,500 shares (which are beneficially
owned by Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Portfolio
(Neuberger Portfolio), a series of Neuberger Funds).
Neuberger LLC and Neuberger Management serve as a sub-advisor
and investment manager, respectively, of Neuberger Portfolio,
and may be deemed to beneficially own shares held in Neuberger
Portfolio. |
|
(5) |
|
Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on February 13, 2006 by Baron Capital
Group, Inc. (BCG), BAMCO, Inc., an investment
advisor (BAMCO), Baron Capital Management, Inc., an
investment advisor (BCM), Baron Growth Fund, a
registered investment company (BGF), and Ronald
Baron. Such filing indicates that (a) BCG has shared voting
power with respect to 4,255,827 shares and shared voting
power with respect to 4,885,727 shares, (b) BAMCO has
shared voting power with respect to 3,992,950 shares and
shared dispositive power with respect to 4,597,350 shares,
(c) BCM has shared voting power with respect to
262,877 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to
288,377 shares, (d) BGF has shared voting and
dispositive power with respect to 3,700,000 shares, and
(e) Ronald Baron has shared voting power with respect to
4,255,827 shares and shared dispositive power with respect
to 4,885,727 shares. BAMCO and BCM are subsidiaries of BCG.
BGF is an advisory client of BAMCO. Ronald Baron owns a
controlling interest in BCG. By virtue of investment advisory
agreements with their respective clients, BAMCO and BCM have
been given the discretion to dispose or to direct the
disposition of the securities in the advisory accounts. BCG and
Ronald Baron disclaim beneficial ownership of shares held by
their controlled entities (or the investment advisory clients
thereof) to the extent such shares are held by persons other
than BCG and Ronald Baron. BAMCO and BCM disclaim beneficial
ownership of shares held by their investment advisory clients to
the extent such shares are held by persons other than BAMCO, BCM
and their affiliates. |
|
(6) |
|
Based on an amendment to Schedule 13G filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2006 by
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Price Associates).
Such filing indicates that Price Associates has sole voting
power with respect to 1,001,450 shares and sole dispositive
power with respect to 4,744,100 shares. These securities
are owned by various individual and institutional investors,
which Price Associates serves as investment advisor with power
to direct investments
and/or sole
power to vote the securities. For purposes of the reporting
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Price
Associates is deemed to be a beneficial |
13
|
|
|
|
|
owner of such securities; however, Price Associates expressly
disclaims that it is, in fact, the beneficial owner of such
securities. |
|
(7) |
|
Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on February 14, 2006 by Wellington
Management Company, LLP, an investment advisor
(WMC). Such filing indicates that WMC has shared
voting power with respect to 3,199,150 shares and shared
dispositive power with respect to 3,821,150 shares. WMC, in
its capacity as investment advisor, may be deemed to
beneficially own 3,835,850 shares which are held of record
by clients of WMC. Those clients have the right to receive, or
the power to direct the receipt of, dividends from, or the
proceeds from the sale of, such securities. |
|
(8) |
|
Mr. Brumley directly owns 40,877 shares. Two limited
partnerships own a total of 2,546,871 shares.
Mr. Brumley is the sole officer, director and shareholder
of the corporation that is the sole general partner of each of
the partnerships. Accordingly, Mr. Brumley has sole voting
and dispositive power with respect to the shares owned by these
partnerships. Furthermore, Mr. Brumley has the power to
vote or to direct the vote of 212,820 shares of restricted
common stock. Mr. Brumley is also deemed to beneficially
own 297,242 shares of common stock that may be acquired
upon the exercise of options that were or would have become
exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2006. |
SECTION 16(a)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, requires our directors, executive officers and holders
of more than 10% of the Companys common stock to file with
the Securities and Exchange Commission reports regarding their
ownership and changes in ownership of our securities. The
Company believes that, during fiscal 2005, its directors,
executive officers and 10% stockholders complied with all
Section 16(a) filing requirements. In making these
statements, the Company has relied upon examination of the
copies of Forms 3, 4 and 5, and amendments thereto,
provided to the Company and the written representations of its
directors and executive officers.
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
The Companys executive officers serve at the discretion of
the Board. Information regarding the business experience of each
of the Companys executive officers is provided below.
|
|
I.
|
Jon
Brumley, age 67, Chairman of the Board
|
Please read page 8 for information regarding Mr. I.
Jon Brumleys business experience.
Jon S.
Brumley, age 35, Chief Executive Officer and
President
Please read page 9 for information regarding Mr. Jon
S. Brumleys business experience.
L. Ben
Nivens, age 45, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary
Mr. Nivens has been Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary of the Company since
November 2005. Mr. Nivens served as Vice President of Corporate
Strategy and Treasurer of the Company from June 2005 until
October 2005. From April 2002 to June 2005, Mr. Nivens served as
an engineering manager of the Company. Prior to joining the
Company, he worked as a reservoir engineer for Prize Energy from
1999 to 2002. From 1990 to 1999, Mr. Nivens worked in the
corporate planning group at Union Pacific Resources and also
served as a reservoir engineer. In addition, he worked as a
reservoir engineer for Compass Bank in 1999. Mr. Nivens
received a Bachelor of Science in Petroleum Engineering from
Texas Tech University and a Masters of Business Administration
from Southern Methodist University.
Thomas H.
Olle, age 51, Senior Vice President Asset
Management
Mr. Olle has been Senior Vice
President Asset Management since February 2005.
Mr. Olle served as Senior Vice President, Asset Management
of the Cedar Creek Anticline from April 2003 to February 2005.
Mr. Olle joined
14
the Company in March 2002 as Vice President of Engineering.
Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Olle served as Senior
Engineering Advisor of Burlington Resources, Inc. (an
independent oil and gas company) from September 1999 to March
2002. From July 1986 to September 1999, he served as a Regional
Engineer of Burlington Resources. Mr. Olle received a
Bachelor of Science degree with Highest Honors in Mechanical
Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin.
Robert S.
Jacobs, age 44, Senior Vice
President Administration
Mr. Jacobs has been the Senior Vice
President Administration of the Company since
June 2005. Mr. Jacobs was Senior Vice
President Business Development and Planning of
the Company from April 2003 until June 2005. Mr. Jacobs was a
Senior Geologist at the Company from July 1998 until August
1999, Vice President Geology of the Company
from August 1999 until September 2001 and Senior Vice
President Asset Management of the Company from
September 2001 until April 2003. Mr. Jacobs worked as an
exploration and development geologist for Bass Enterprises
Production Company (an independent oil and gas company) from
1986 until joining the Company in 1998. He received his Bachelor
of Science in Geology from Duke University and his Master of
Science in Geology from North Carolina State University.
Mr. Jacobs is a Certified Petroleum Geologist.
Donald P.
Gann, Jr., age 44, Senior Vice
President North Region and Drilling
Mr. Gann has been the Senior Vice
President North Region and Drilling of the
Company since October 2005. Mr. Gann served as Senior Vice
President Operations of the Company from April
2003 until October 2005. Mr. Gann was a Senior Engineer at
the Company from August 1998 until June 1999, a Production
Manager at the Company from June 1999 until January 2001, Vice
President Production of the Company from
January 2001 until February 2002 and Senior Vice
President Production of the Company from
February 2002 to April 2003. Prior to joining the Company,
Mr. Gann was a Senior Engineer at Mitchell Energy
Corporation (an independent oil and gas company) from July 1984
until August 1998. Mr. Gann received a Bachelor of Science
in Petroleum Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin
and is a Registered Professional Engineer.
Robert C.
Reeves, age 36, Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting
Officer, Controller and Assistant Corporate Secretary
Robert C. Reeves has served as Senior Vice President, Chief
Accounting Officer, Controller and Assistant Corporate Secretary
since November 2005. He served as the Companys Vice
President, Controller and Assistant Corporate Secretary from
August 2000 until October 2005. He served the Company as
Assistant Controller from April 1999 until August 2000. Prior to
joining the Company, Mr. Reeves was Assistant Controller
for Bristol Resources Corporation from 1998 until 1999. Prior to
1998, Mr. Reeves served as Assistant Controller for Hugoton
Energy Corporation. Mr. Reeves received his Bachelor of
Science degree in Accounting from the University of Kansas. He
is a Certified Public Accountant.
John W.
Arms, age 38, Vice President of Business
Development
John W. Arms has served as Vice President of Business
Development since September 2001. From November 1998 until
September 2001, Mr. Arms served in various petroleum
engineering positions for the Company. Prior to joining the
Company in November 1998, Mr. Arms was a Senior Reservoir
Engineer for Union Pacific Resources and an Engineer at XTO
Energy, Inc. Mr. Arms received a Bachelor of Science in
Petroleum Engineering from the Colorado School of Mines.
15
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The following table summarizes the total compensation awarded
to, earned by, or paid to the chief executive officer and to the
Companys other named executive officers for the periods
indicated:
Summary
Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Name and Principal
Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary ($)
|
|
|
Bonus ($)
|
|
|
($)(a)
|
|
|
(#)(b)(c)
|
|
|
($)(d)
|
|
|
I. Jon Brumley
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
487,500
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
2,100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,063
|
(e)
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
421,875
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
2,100,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
728,500
|
|
|
|
93,361
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
Jon S. Brumley
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
364,167
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
1,050,000
|
|
|
|
29,949
|
|
|
|
12,600
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and
President
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
306,875
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
899,932
|
|
|
|
30,269
|
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
285,000
|
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
|
267,100
|
|
|
|
68,464
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
Thomas H. Olle
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
230,000
|
|
|
|
160,000
|
|
|
|
320,000
|
|
|
|
9,127
|
|
|
|
12,600
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
203,125
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
300,641
|
|
|
|
10,050
|
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
Asset Management
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
181,250
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
121,400
|
|
|
|
31,120
|
|
|
|
10,875
|
|
Donald P. Gann, Jr.
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
211,667
|
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
270,000
|
|
|
|
7,701
|
|
|
|
12,600
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
194,375
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
250,070
|
|
|
|
8,400
|
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
North Region and Drilling
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
183,750
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
97,100
|
|
|
|
24,897
|
|
|
|
11,025
|
|
Robert S. Jacobs
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
213,333
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
7,131
|
|
|
|
12,600
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
204,375
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
250,070
|
|
|
|
8,400
|
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
Administration
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
192,500
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
116,600
|
|
|
|
29,875
|
|
|
|
11,550
|
|
Roy W. Jageman
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
207,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
601,438
|
(f)
|
Former Executive Vice President,
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
244,375
|
|
|
|
160,000
|
|
|
|
318,560
|
|
|
|
10,762
|
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
Chief Financial Officer,
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
155,410
|
|
|
|
66,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasurer and Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The value of the restricted stock awards is based on the price
of the common stock as of the date of grant. At
December 31, 2005, Mr. I. Jon Brumley held
145,296 shares of restricted stock with a value of
$4,655,284; Mr. Jon S. Brumley held 60,169 shares of
restricted stock with a value of $1,927,815; Mr. Olle held
21,250 shares of restricted stock with a value of $680,850;
Mr. Gann held 18,646 shares of restricted stock with a
value of $597,418; Mr. Jacobs held 20,491 shares of
restricted stock with a value of $656,532; and Mr. Jageman
held no shares of restricted stock. Restricted stock awards
granted for fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003 vest in three equal
annual installments beginning on the third anniversary of the
date of grant. Restricted stock awards granted for fiscal 2005
vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the first
anniversary of the date of grant. All restricted stock awards
are subject to forfeiture if certain performance objectives are
not satisfied and to accelerated vesting on a change in control
or the termination of the employees employment due to
death or disability and to such other terms as are set forth in
the award agreement. Holders of restricted stock have the right
to vote and to receive dividends paid with respect to shares of
restricted stock. |
|
(b) |
|
Securities Underlying Options represent options to purchase
shares of the Companys common stock. The 2000 Incentive
Stock Plan provides for employee and non-employee director
awards in the form of stock options and restricted stock. |
|
(c) |
|
Stock option awards listed for each year were granted in
February of each subsequent year. The options were granted at an
exercise price equal to the fair market value of the
Companys common stock on the date of grant. |
|
(d) |
|
Represents contributions to the Companys 401(k) Plan for
each named officer in 2005, 2004 and 2003. |
|
(e) |
|
Includes $25,463 related to use of the Companys aircraft
for travel to and from Houston, Texas in connection with medical
treatments for Mr. Brumleys wife at MD Anderson Cancer
Center. |
|
(f) |
|
Mr. Jageman resigned from the Company in November 2005. The
column entitled All Other Compensation includes
$590,000 of compensation payable to Mr. Jageman in
connection with his resignation. |
16
The following table contains information with respect to the
grant of stock options under the Companys 2000 Incentive
Stock Plan to the named executive officers in 2005:
Option/SAR
Grants in Last Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Percent of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Options/SARs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Realized Value at
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Granted to
|
|
|
Exercise or
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed Annual Rates of
|
|
|
|
Options/SARs
|
|
|
Employees in
|
|
|
Base Price
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
Stock Price Appreciation for
Option Term
|
|
Name
|
|
Granted (#)(a)
|
|
|
Fiscal Year (%)
|
|
|
($/Share)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
5% ($)
|
|
|
10% ($)
|
|
|
I. Jon Brumley
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jon S. Brumley
|
|
|
30,269
|
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
26.55
|
|
|
|
02/14/2015
|
|
|
|
505,343
|
|
|
|
1,280,639
|
|
Thomas H. Olle
|
|
|
10,050
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
26.55
|
|
|
|
02/14/2015
|
|
|
|
167,786
|
|
|
|
425,201
|
|
Donald P. Gann, Jr.
|
|
|
8,400
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
26.55
|
|
|
|
02/14/2015
|
|
|
|
140,239
|
|
|
|
355,392
|
|
Robert S. Jacobs
|
|
|
8,400
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
26.55
|
|
|
|
02/14/2015
|
|
|
|
140,239
|
|
|
|
355,392
|
|
Roy W. Jageman
|
|
|
10,762
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
26.55
|
|
|
|
02/14/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The options vest and become exercisable in three equal annual
installments beginning on February 14, 2006. |
Aggregated
Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year
and Fiscal Year End Option Values
The following table sets forth information concerning the
exercise of stock options during 2005 by each named executive
officer and the value of unexercised stock options as of
December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Underlying
|
|
|
Value of Unexercised
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised Stock
|
|
|
In-the-Money
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Options at 12/31/05
(#)
|
|
|
Options at 12/31/05
($)(a)
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Realized ($)
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
I. Jon Brumley
|
|
|
14,143
|
|
|
|
197,248
|
|
|
|
266,122
|
|
|
|
62,240
|
|
|
|
5,454,116
|
|
|
|
925,303
|
|
Jon S. Brumley
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,387
|
|
|
|
75,911
|
|
|
|
4,635,147
|
|
|
|
844,823
|
|
Thomas H. Olle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,857
|
|
|
|
30,796
|
|
|
|
798,513
|
|
|
|
363,632
|
|
Donald P. Gann, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,652
|
|
|
|
24,998
|
|
|
|
1,893,869
|
|
|
|
292,901
|
|
Robert S. Jacobs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,108
|
|
|
|
28,316
|
|
|
|
602,704
|
|
|
|
342,229
|
|
Roy W. Jageman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Computed based on the difference between the option exercise
price and $32.04 (the closing price of the common stock at
December 30, 2005). |
Change in
Control Arrangements
On February 11, 2003, the Board adopted the Employee
Severance Protection Plan, which provides employees of the
Company with severance payments and benefits upon certain
terminations of employment occurring from 90 days prior to
until two years following a Change in Control (as described
below) of the Company. If during such time period, a named
executive officer is involuntarily terminated by the Company
other than for cause or he resigns for Good Reason (as described
below), the officer will receive a cash amount equal to twice
his annual salary and bonus, continued insurance coverage for up
to 36 months, and the automatic vesting of all his stock
options and restricted stock. The Company would also be
obligated to pay an additional amount to gross up
the amount, if any, of excise and related income tax payable by
the officer under the golden parachute provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code in order for the officer to be able to
retain the full amount due under the severance plan.
Generally, a Change in Control occurs upon (1) the
acquisition by a party of 40% or more of the voting securities
of the Company unless the party owned 20% prior to
February 11, 2003; (2) a majority of the Board no
longer consists of persons who were Board members on
February 11, 2002 or persons appointed to the Board by
17
those members; (3) approval by the stockholders of the
Company of a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company;
or (4) approval by the stockholders of the Company of a
reorganization, merger, share exchange, consolidation or a sale
of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, unless
more than 60% of the voting securities of the new entity are
held by persons who were stockholders of the Company.
A resignation for Good Reason occurs when an officer resigns as
a result of a reduction in his titles, duties, responsibilities,
compensation level or the relocation of his place of employment.
Retirement
Plan
The Company makes contributions to the Encore Acquisition
Company 401(k) Plan, which is a voluntary and contributory plan
for eligible employees. The Companys contributions, which
are based on a percentage of matching employee contributions,
totaled approximately $0.8 million in 2005,
$0.6 million in 2004 and $0.5 million in 2003.
Compensation
Committee Report on Executive Compensation
The Companys executive compensation program is
administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board (the
Compensation Committee). The Compensation Committee
is composed entirely of independent directors. The specific
duties and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are
described above under Board Structure and Committee
Composition Compensation Committee and in
the charter of the Compensation Committee, which is available on
the Corporate Governance section of the
Companys website at www.encoreacq.com.
The Compensation Committee meets each February to establish base
salaries for the then-current fiscal year, to set cash bonuses
and award equity-based compensation in respect of Company and
executive performance during the preceding fiscal year and to
review and, as appropriate, make changes to the Companys
executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee also
meets at other times during the year and acts by written consent
when necessary and appropriate. For the past three years, the
Compensation Committee has engaged an outside compensation
consulting firm to assist the Compensation Committee in its
review of the compensation for the executive officers.
The Compensation Committee has furnished the following report on
executive compensation for fiscal 2005.
Executive
Compensation Philosophy
In establishing executive compensation, the Company believes
that:
|
|
|
|
|
base salaries should be at levels competitive with peer group
companies that compete with the Company for business
opportunities and executive talent;
|
|
|
|
annual cash bonuses, stock option awards and restricted stock
awards should reflect progress toward the Companys goals
and individual performance; and
|
|
|
|
the Company should encourage significant executive stock
ownership through stock options and restricted stock awards.
|
Purpose
of the Executive Compensation Program
The Companys executive compensation program has been
designed to accomplish the following long-term objectives:
|
|
|
|
|
create a proper balance between building stockholder wealth and
executive wealth while maintaining good corporate governance;
|
|
|
|
produce long-term, positive results for the Companys
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
align executive compensation with Company performance and
appropriate peer group comparisons;
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
provide market-competitive compensation and benefits that will
enable the Company to attract, motivate and retain a talented
workforce; and
|
|
|
|
prevent short-term inappropriate manipulation to increase
compensation.
|
Elements
of Compensation
The Companys executive compensation program generally
consists of (1) base salaries, (2) annual incentive
compensation consisting of cash bonuses, stock option awards and
restricted stock awards and (3) contributions to the
Companys 401(k) retirement plan. In setting executive
compensation, the Compensation Committee considers the aggregate
compensation payable to an executive and the form of the
compensation. The Compensation Committee pays base salaries at
levels it believes are competitive with peer group companies
(described below). In general, an executives annual
incentive compensation consists of approximately 25% cash (in
the form of an annual cash bonus), 50% restricted stock and 25%
stock options, although the mix of restricted stock and stock
options may vary. The Compensation Committee believes that
making approximately 75% of an executives annual incentive
compensation contingent on long-term stock price performance
more closely aligns the executives interests with those of
the Companys stockholders.
The Compensation Committee evaluates the executive compensation
programs and practices for the Companys executive officers
against an industry peer group in order to achieve a competitive
level of compensation. Overall, the Company targets total
compensation for its executive officers at between the
50th and 75th percentiles of total compensation for
similar positions in the peer group, although actual total
compensation may be lower than the 50th percentile or
higher than the 75th percentile based on individual
performance and experience and Company performance and other
factors. The companies chosen by the Compensation Committee for
the peer group generally are not the same companies that
comprise the Independent Oil and Gas Index shown in the Stock
Performance Graph included in this proxy statement. The peer
group companies for executive compensation purposes represent
oil and gas companies of comparable size to the Company,
including companies that compete with the Company both for
business opportunities and for executive talent, while the
Independent Oil and Gas Index is an amalgamation of many
companies designed simply to provide a market barometer for an
entire sectors performance.
The Companys executive compensation program contains
performance-based goals relating to, among other things, the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
budgeted oil and natural gas production;
|
|
|
|
rates of return on invested capital;
|
|
|
|
finding and development costs;
|
|
|
|
efficiency ratios (defined as EBITDA divided by three year
finding and development costs); and
|
|
|
|
reserve replacement (defined as the ratio of reserves added
through acquisitions and internal growth to production).
|
For 2005, the Company met or exceeded the performance-based
goals. In addition to specific performance-based goals, the
Company also considered the following factors, among others,
when establishing 2005 compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
the Companys financial condition and results of operations;
|
|
|
|
implementation of the Companys development program,
including results of the Companys high-pressure air
injection project;
|
|
|
|
the Companys success in integrating acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
the status of the Companys high pressure air injection
program;
|
|
|
|
the Companys safety record;
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
accomplishments of the Companys technical, business
development, land, finance, accounting and marketing
groups; and
|
|
|
|
the Companys compliance with Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
The Compensation Committee evaluates Company performance in
light of oil and natural gas industry fundamentals and assesses
how effectively management adapts to changing industry
conditions and opportunities during the year in preparing itself
to capitalize on opportunities in the future.
Base Salaries. An executives base salary
is viewed as a component of total compensation that should be
competitive with base salaries of the peer group. The
Compensation Committee evaluates the base salaries of the
Companys executive officers on the basis of competitive
base salary data and consideration of each officers duties
and responsibilities. The Compensation Committee views the named
executive officers that report to the CEO as a team with diverse
duties, but shared corporate results and goals.
Annual Cash Bonuses. An executives
annual cash bonus is set at a level intended to result in
approximately 25% of the executives total annual incentive
compensation being paid in cash. Annual cash bonuses reflect
progress toward the Companys goals and individual
performance.
Stock Option Awards and Restricted Stock
Awards. The Compensation Committee makes stock
option and restricted stock awards in amounts intended to result
in approximately 75% of the executives total annual
incentive compensation being paid in stock. The Compensation
Committee believes that making approximately 75% of an
executives compensation contingent on long-term stock
price performance more closely aligns the executives
interests with those of the Companys stockholders. Like
cash bonuses, stock options and restricted stock awards reflect
progress toward the Companys goals and individual
performance.
Stock options vest in three equal annual installments beginning
on the first anniversary of the date of grant, subject to
earlier vesting on a change in control or the termination of an
employees employment due to death or disability and to
such other terms as are set forth in the award agreement.
Restricted stock awards granted to the Companys executive
officers (and certain other members of management) with respect
to fiscal 2005 vest in four equal annual installments beginning
on the first anniversary of the date of grant, subject to the
achievement of performance objectives (achievement of reserve
replacement or finding and development cost goals) and to
earlier vesting on a change in control or the termination of an
employees employment due to death or disability and to
such other terms as are set forth in the award agreement. For
prior fiscal years, restricted stock awards vested in three
equal annual installments beginning on the third anniversary of
the date grant. In changing the vesting schedule for fiscal 2005
grants, the Compensation Committee considered the increasingly
competitive environment for executive talent in the oil and
natural gas industry, and the Companys desire to retain
existing management personnel.
Chief
Executive Officer Compensation
Mr. I. Jon Brumley was the Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company during 2005. Beginning
January 1, 2006, Mr. Brumley stepped down as Chief
Executive Officer, and Mr. Jon S. Brumley assumed that
position. The compensation for Mr. I. Jon Brumley and
Mr. Jon S. Brumley was determined in the same manner as set
forth above with regard to executive officers generally. The
Compensation Committee has retained an outside compensation
consulting firm to assist the Compensation Committee in
developing its compensation program and reviewing compensation
in the marketplace.
In February 2006, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. I.
Jon Brumley an annual cash bonus of $700,000 and
67,524 shares of restricted stock (with a value of
approximately $2.1 million on the date of grant). In making
its decision, the Compensation Committee considered Company and
personal performance for fiscal 2005 and competitive market
data. In light of his changed responsibilities, however, the
Compensation Committee reduced Mr. I. Jon Brumleys
annual base salary from $500,000 to $350,000 effective as of
March 1, 2006 (which is the effective date for base salary
changes for employees generally). The Compensation Committee
also considered and approved in advance Mr. I. Jon
Brumleys personal use of the Companys aircraft for
travel to and from Houston, Texas in connection with medical
treatments for Mr. Brumleys wife at MD Anderson Cancer
Center. The aggregate incremental cost for personal use of the
Companys aircraft by Mr. and Mrs. Brumley was
$25,463 in fiscal 2005.
20
Also in February 2006, the Compensation Committee increased
Mr. Jon S. Brumleys annual base salary from $375,000
to $475,000 (effective March 1, 2006) after
consideration of historical and expected future performance and
competitive market data. With respect to Mr. Brumleys
annual incentive compensation for 2005, the Compensation
Committee evaluated the factors described above and granted
Mr. Brumley an annual cash bonus of $525,000, 29,949 stock
options (with a value of approximately $0.5 million on the
date of grant), and 33,762 shares of restricted stock (with
a value of approximately $1.1 million on the date of grant).
Stock
Ownership Guidelines
In February 2005, the Compensation Committee adopted stock
ownership guidelines that require each executive officer (and
certain other members of management) to own shares of the
Companys common stock with a value at least equal to such
persons base salary. Until this guideline is achieved, the
executive officer (or other member of management) will be
required to retain at least 25% of his or her restricted stock
for a period of two years after vesting. The Companys
stock ownership guidelines are designed to increase
executives equity stakes in the Company and to align
executives interests more closely with those of the
Companys stockholders.
Corporate
Tax Deduction on Compensation In Excess of $1 Million a
Year
Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the Code), generally disallows a
tax deduction to public companies for compensation in excess of
$1 million paid to the CEO or any of the four other most
highly compensated officers. Performance-based compensation
arrangements may qualify for an exemption from the deduction
limit if they satisfy various requirements under
Section 162(m). Although the Company considers the impact
of this rule when developing and implementing the Companys
executive compensation program, the Company believes that it is
important to preserve flexibility in designing compensation
programs. Accordingly, the Company has not adopted a policy that
all compensation must qualify as deductible under
Section 162(m). While the Companys restricted stock
and stock option awards are intended to qualify as
performance-based (as defined in the Code), amounts
paid under the Companys other compensation programs may
not qualify.
Compensation Committee of the Board
James A. Winne III, Chairman
Ted Collins, Jr.
21
STOCK
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares the Companys cumulative total
stockholder return during the period from March 9, 2001
(the date of the Companys initial public offering) to
December 31, 2005 with total stockholder return during the
same period for the Independent Oil and Gas Index and the
Standard & Poors 500 Index. The graph assumes
that $100 was invested in the Companys common stock and
each index on March 9, 2001 and that all dividends were
reinvested.
Comparison
of Total Return Since March 9, 2001 Among
Encore Acquisition Company, the Standard & Poors
500 Index,
and the Independent Oil and Gas Index
22
AUDIT
COMMITTEE REPORT
The Companys Audit Committee is composed solely of
independent directors, as defined in the New York Stock
Exchanges current listing standards and
Section 10A(m)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the Exchange Act), and it operates under a written
charter adopted by the Board of Directors. Committee members may
not simultaneously serve on the audit committee of more than two
other public companies unless such service is approved by the
Board. The composition of the Audit Committee, the attributes of
its members and its responsibilities, as reflected in its
charter, are intended to be in accordance with applicable
requirements for corporate audit committees.
During fiscal year 2005, the Audit Committee was composed of
three directors: Messrs. Gardner (Chairman), Bowen and
Genova. Each member of the Audit Committee is financially
literate and Mr. Gardner meets the definition of an audit
committee financial expert as promulgated by the SEC.
As described more fully in its charter, The Audit Committee
assists the Board in overseeing (1) the integrity of the
Companys financial statements; (2) the Companys
compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (3) the
independence, qualifications and performance of the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm;
and (4) the Companys performance of its internal
audit function. Management is responsible for the preparation,
presentation and integrity of the Companys financial
statements, accounting and financial reporting principles,
internal controls and procedures designed to ensure compliance
with accounting standards, applicable laws and regulations.
The Company has retained Weaver Tidwell LLP to perform internal
audit functions. Weaver Tidwell LLP reports to the Audit
Committee and to management. This firm is responsible for
objectively reviewing and evaluating compliance with the
Companys policies and procedures.
Ernst & Young LLP, the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm, is responsible for performing
an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). In accordance with the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Audit Committee has ultimate
authority and responsibility to select, compensate, evaluate
and, when appropriate, replace the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm.
The Audit Committee members are not professional accountants or
auditors, and their functions are not intended to duplicate or
to certify the activities of management and the independent
registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee serves a
board-level oversight role, in which it provides advice, counsel
and direction to management and the auditors on the basis of the
information it receives, discussions with management and the
auditors, and the experience of the Audit Committees
members in business, financial and accounting matters. The Audit
Committee has the authority to engage its own outside advisers,
including experts in particular areas of accounting, as it
determines appropriate, apart from counsel or advisers hired by
management.
During 2005, the Audit Committee met eight times, including
telephone meetings, to discuss relevant accounting, auditing,
internal control and disclosure matters. Meetings were also held
to discuss the interim financial information of the Company
prior to its release to the public and, accordingly, included a
discussion of the results of the Statement on Auditing Standards
(SAS) No. 100 reviews performed by the
Companys independent registered public accountants. The
Audit Committees meetings were conducted with members of
management, representatives of the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm and, in certain instances, the
Companys internal auditors. During these meetings, the
Audit Committee discussed with the Companys internal
auditors and independent registered public accounting firm the
overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Audit
Committee reviewed the results of their examinations and their
evaluation of the Companys internal controls, with certain
matters discussed in the absence of Company management. During
the year, the Audit Committee also discussed with the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm all
matters required by the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), including those
described in SAS No. 61, as amended, Communication
with Audit Committees.
The Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the
letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by Independence
Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence
Discussions with Audit Committees disclosing that they are
independent with respect to the Company within the meaning of
the Securities Act as administered by
23
the SEC and the requirements of the Independence Standards
Board. The Audit Committee discussed with Ernst & Young
LLP any relationships that may have an impact on their
objectivity and independence and satisfied itself as to
Ernst & Youngs independence. The Audit Committee
also considered whether certain non-audit services provided by
Ernst & Young LLP were compatible with maintaining
Ernst & Young LLPs independence. The Audit
Committee approved, among other things, the amount of fees to be
paid to Ernst & Young LLP for audit and non-audit
services.
In accordance with existing Audit Committee policy and the more
recent requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, all services to
be provided by Ernst & Young LLP are subject to
pre-approval by the Audit Committee. The Chairman of the Audit
Committee has been delegated the authority to pre-approve audit
and non-audit services, with such pre-approvals subsequently
reported to the full Audit Committee. Typically, however, the
Audit Committee itself reviews the matters to be approved. The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 prohibits an issuer from obtaining
certain non-audit services from its independent registered
public accounting firm so as to avoid certain potential
conflicts of interest. The Company has not obtained any of these
services from Ernst & Young LLP, and the Company is
able to obtain such services from other service providers at
competitive rates. See Proposal 2: Ratification of
Ernst & Young LLP as Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm for more information regarding fees paid
to Ernst & Young LLP for services in fiscal years 2005
and 2004.
The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audits of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting and its
consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2005 with management and the independent
registered public accounting firm. Based on the above-mentioned
review and discussions, and subject to the limitations on the
Audit Committees role and responsibilities described above
and in the Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee
recommended to the Board of Directors that the Companys
audited consolidated financial statements be included in its
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 for filing with
the SEC.
Audit Committee of the Board
Ted A. Gardner, Chairman
Martin C. Bowen
John V. Genova
24
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as
the Companys independent registered public accounting firm
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. Stockholders
are being asked to ratify the appointment of Ernst &
Young LLP at the annual meeting pursuant to
Proposal No. 2. Representatives of Ernst &
Young LLP are expected to be present at the annual meeting, will
have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so
and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate
questions.
Fees
Incurred by the Company for Services Provided by
Ernst & Young LLP
The following table shows the fees paid or accrued by the
Company for the audit and other services provided by
Ernst & Young LLP for fiscal 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Audit Fees(1)
|
|
$
|
441,210
|
|
|
$
|
413,266
|
|
Audit-Related Fees(2)
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
55,528
|
|
Tax Fees(3)
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
|
200,465
|
|
All Other Fees(4)
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
494,646
|
|
|
$
|
671,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Audit fees represent fees for professional services provided in
connection with the audit of our consolidated financial
statements and review of our quarterly consolidated financial
statements and audit services provided in connection with
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including
comfort letters, consents and comment letters. |
|
(2) |
|
Audit-related fees consisted of services related to business
acquisitions. |
|
(3) |
|
For fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively, tax fees included tax
compliance fees of $936 and $120,000, and tax advice and tax
planning fees of $0 and $80,465. |
|
(4) |
|
All other fees consisted of fees for access to EY Online, an
Internet-based resource for accounting and auditing matters. |
Audit
Committees Pre-Approval Policy and Procedures
The Audit Committees policy is to pre-approve all audit
and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent
registered public accounting firm. These services may include
audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other
services. Pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service
or category of service and is subject to a specific approval.
The Audit Committee requires the independent registered public
accounting firm and management to report on the actual fees
charged for each category of service at Audit Committee meetings
throughout the year.
During the year, circumstances may arise when it may become
necessary to engage the independent registered public accounting
firm for additional services not contemplated in the original
pre-approval. In those instances, the Audit Committee requires
specific pre-approval before engaging the independent registered
public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has delegated
pre-approval authority to the Chairman of the Audit Committee
for those instances when pre-approval is needed prior to a
scheduled Audit Committee meeting. The Chairman of the Audit
Committee must report on such approvals at the next scheduled
Audit Committee meeting.
All fiscal year 2005 audit and non-audit services provided by
the independent registered public accounting firm were
pre-approved.
25
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
In October 2004, the Board approved indemnity agreements between
the Company and each of its officers and directors. The
indemnity agreements provide for indemnification by the Company
of each indemnitee to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware
law for claims relating to the indemnitees service as an
officer or director, excluding any claim in which a judgment
determines that the indemnitee personally gained financial
profit or other advantage to which he was not legally entitled
and acted in bad faith or was deliberately dishonest in a manner
that was material to the claim. The agreements also provide for
advancement of expenses relating to the indemnification
obligations and obligate the Company to purchase and maintain
liability insurance for each indemnitees acts as an
officer or director.
The Company and Mr. I. Jon Brumley and Mr. Jon S.
Brumley (collectively, the rights holders) are
parties to a registration rights agreement dated as of
August 18, 1998 that provides the rights holders with
registration rights with respect to shares of the Companys
common stock held by them. To date, none of the rights holders
has effected a registration of securities. The Company is
required under the registration rights agreement to pay for the
offering costs for the registrations.
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS
Advance
Notice Procedures for Director Nominees
For director nominations by a stockholder to be properly made at
the Companys annual meeting of stockholders, stockholders
must also comply with Section 2.14 of the Companys
Second Amended and Restated By-Laws. Under Section 2.14, a
stockholder must submit to the Company, on a timely basis, a
written notice setting forth:
|
|
|
|
|
as to each person whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for
election or reelection as a director all information relating to
such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of
proxies for election of directors in an election contest, or is
otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Schedule 14A
under the Exchange Act and
Rule 14a-11
thereunder (including such persons written consent to
being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving
as a director if elected), and
|
|
|
|
as to the stockholder giving the notice and the beneficial
owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination is made
(1) the name and address of such stockholder, as they
appear on the Companys books, and of such beneficial owner
and (2) the class or series and number of shares of the
Company which are owned beneficially and of record by such
stockholder and such beneficial owner.
|
For nominations to be properly made at an annual meeting by a
stockholder, the stockholder must have given timely notice
thereof in writing to the Corporate Secretary of the Company at
the Companys principal executive offices not more than
120 days and not less than 90 days prior to the first
anniversary of the preceding years annual meeting.
However, if the date of the annual meeting is more than
30 days before or more than 90 days after the
anniversary date of the preceding years annual meeting,
then to be timely the notice by the stockholder must be
delivered not more than 120 days and not less than
90 days prior to the annual meeting or the 10th day on
following the day on which public announcement of the date of
the annual meeting is first made by the Company. These
requirements are separate from and in addition to the SECs
requirements that a stockholder must meet in order to have a
stockholder proposal included in the Companys proxy
statement.
With respect to the 2007 annual meeting, a stockholders
written notice must be received by the Company not earlier than
January 2, 2007 and not later than February 1, 2007.
Director nominations should be sent to Corporate Secretary,
Encore Acquisition Company, 777 Main Street, Suite 1400,
Fort Worth, Texas 76102. The Company recommends that any
such proposal be sent by certified mail with return receipt
requested.
Rule 14a-8
Stockholder Proposals
Any stockholder of the Company who desires to submit a proposal
for inclusion in the Companys proxy statement for the
annual meeting of stockholders in 2007 may do so by following
the procedures prescribed in
26
Rule 14a-8
under the Exchange Act. To be eligible for inclusion,
stockholder proposals must be received by the Companys
Corporate Secretary no later than November 21, 2006.
Proposals should be sent to Corporate Secretary, Encore
Acquisition Company, 777 Main Street, Suite 1400,
Fort Worth, Texas 76102. The Company recommends that any
such proposal be sent by certified mail with return receipt
requested.
Non-Rule 14a-8
Stockholder Proposals
If a stockholder notifies the Company after February 11,
2007 of an intent to present a proposal at the annual meeting of
stockholders in 2007, the Company will have the right to
exercise its discretionary voting authority with respect to such
proposal without including information regarding such proposal
in its proxy materials. Discretionary voting
authority is the ability to vote proxies that stockholders
have executed and returned to the Company, on matters not
specifically reflected in the Companys proxy materials,
and on which stockholders have not had an opportunity to vote by
proxy. Proposals should be sent to Corporate Secretary, Encore
Acquisition Company, 777 Main Street, Suite 1400,
Fort Worth, Texas 76102. The Company recommends that any
such proposal be sent by certified mail with return receipt
requested.
SOLICITATION
OF PROXIES
Solicitation of proxies may be made by mail, personal interview,
telephone or other means by officers, directors and regular
employees of the Company for which they shall receive no
compensation in addition to their normal compensation. The
Company may also request banking institutions, brokerage firms,
custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward solicitation
material to the beneficial owners of the common stock that those
companies or persons hold of record. The Company will reimburse
the forwarding expenses of any institution that performs this
service. The Company has engaged its transfer agent, Mellon
Investor Services, to assist it in the production of proxy cards
and envelopes, the mailing of proxy materials and the tabulation
of proxy votes. The Company will reimburse Mellon Investor
Services for its costs, which are not expected to exceed $10,000.
STOCKHOLDER
LIST
The Company will maintain at its corporate offices in
Fort Worth, Texas a list of the stockholders entitled to
vote at the annual meeting. During the ten days before the
annual meeting, any stockholder may examine the list at the
Fort Worth office during normal business hours.
ANNUAL
REPORT
The Companys Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2005 is being mailed to
stockholders concurrently with this proxy statement. A copy of
the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, will be sent to any
stockholder without charge upon request. Forward written
requests to Investor Relations, Encore Acquisition Company, 777
Main Street, Suite 1400, Fort Worth, Texas 76102. Oral
requests may be requested at telephone number
(817) 877-9955.
The Annual Report on
Form 10-K
is also available on the SECs website (www.sec.gov) and
the Companys website (www.encoreacq.com).
HOUSEHOLDING
The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted rules that
permit companies and intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy
delivery requirements for proxy statements with respect to two
or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a
single proxy statement addressed to those shareholders. This
process, which is commonly referred to as
householding, potentially provides extra convenience
for stockholders and cost savings for companies. Some brokers
household proxy materials, delivering a single proxy statement
to multiple shareholders sharing an address unless contrary
instructions have been received from the affected shareholders.
Once you have received notice from your broker that they will be
householding materials to your address, householding will
continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke
your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to
27
participate in householding and would prefer to receive a
separate proxy statement, or if you are receiving multiple
copies of the proxy statement and wish to receive only one,
please notify your broker.
* * * * *
IT IS IMPORTANT THAT PROXIES BE RETURNED PROMPTLY. WHETHER OR
NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON, YOU ARE URGED TO
COMPLETE, SIGN, AND RETURN THE PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED
POSTAGE-PAID, ADDRESSED ENVELOPE OR TO VOTE THROUGH THE INTERNET
OR TELEPHONE.
By Order of the Board of Directors
L. Ben Nivens
Corporate Secretary
Fort Worth, Texas
March 28, 2006
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
APPENDIX |
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED, OR IF NO
|
|
Please mark here
|
|
Please mark |
|
|
DIRECTION IS INDICATED, WILL BE
|
|
for address change
|
|
your votes as |
|
|
VOTED FOR PROPOSALS 1 and 2.
|
|
or comments o
|
|
indicated in
|
|
R |
|
|
SEE REVERSE SIDE
|
|
this example |
|
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS.
1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WITHHELD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominees:
|
|
FOR ALL
|
|
FOR ALL |
|
|
|
01 |
|
|
I. Jon Brumley
|
|
£
|
|
£ |
|
|
|
02 |
|
|
Jon S. Brumley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
03 |
|
|
John A. Bailey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04 |
|
|
Martin C. Bowen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05 |
|
|
Ted Collins, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
06 |
|
|
Ted A. Gardner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07 |
|
|
John V. Genova |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08 |
|
|
James A. Winne III |
|
|
|
|
FOR ALL, except the nominees you list below: (Write that nominees name in the space provided
below.)
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.
2. RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM -
To ratify the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAIN |
|
|
£
|
|
£
|
|
£ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign as name appears hereon. Joint
|
|
|
|
|
owners should each sign. When signing as |
|
|
|
|
attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or |
|
|
|
|
guardian, please give full title as such. |
|
|
|
|
Dated: , 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature if held jointly |
|
|
Vote by Internet or Telephone or Mail
24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week
Internet and telephone voting is available through 11:59 PM Eastern Time the business day prior to annual meeting day.
Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.
VOTE BY INTERNET
http://www.proxyvoting.com/eac
Use the Internet to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site.
OR
VOTE BY TELEPHONE
1-866-540-5760
Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you call.
OR
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope
If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone,
you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.
PROXY
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
The undersigned hereby appoints I. Jon Brumley, Jon S. Brumley and L. Ben Nivens, and each of them,
with power to act without the other and with power of substitution, as proxies and
attorneys-in-fact and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as provided on the other side,
all the shares of Encore Acquisition Company Common Stock which the undersigned is entitled to
vote, and, in their discretion, to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held May 2, 2006 or any adjournment thereof,
with all powers which the undersigned would possess if present at the Annual Meeting.
(CONTINUED, AND TO BE MARKED, DATED AND SIGNED, ON THE OTHER SIDE)
FOLD AND DETACH HERE