e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2006
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 001-31720
PIPER JAFFRAY COMPANIES
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
30-0168701
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
800 Nicollet Mall, Suite 800
Minneapolis, Minnesota
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
55402
(Zip Code) |
(612) 303-6000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer þ Non-Accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2).
Yes o No þ
As of July 28, 2006, the registrant had 20,740,866 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
Piper Jaffray Companies
Index to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
1
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Piper Jaffray Companies
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
(Amounts in thousands, except share data) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
138,167 |
|
|
$ |
60,869 |
|
Receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers (net of allowance of $1,665 at June 30, 2006 and $1,793 at December 31, 2005) |
|
|
60,627 |
|
|
|
54,421 |
|
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations |
|
|
136,503 |
|
|
|
299,056 |
|
Deposits with clearing organizations |
|
|
58,340 |
|
|
|
64,379 |
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
243,883 |
|
|
|
222,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities owned |
|
|
615,154 |
|
|
|
517,310 |
|
Trading securities owned and pledged as collateral |
|
|
174,792 |
|
|
|
236,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading securities owned |
|
|
789,946 |
|
|
|
753,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets (net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization of $70,424 and $76,581, respectively) |
|
|
37,520 |
|
|
|
41,752 |
|
Goodwill (net of accumulated amortization of $52,531) |
|
|
317,167 |
|
|
|
317,167 |
|
Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization of $2,533 and $1,733, respectively) |
|
|
2,267 |
|
|
|
3,067 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
38,269 |
|
|
|
24,626 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
89,399 |
|
|
|
69,200 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
419,855 |
|
|
|
442,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,331,943 |
|
|
$ |
2,354,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers |
|
$ |
111,299 |
|
|
$ |
73,781 |
|
Checks and drafts |
|
|
36,141 |
|
|
|
53,304 |
|
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations |
|
|
259,816 |
|
|
|
259,597 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
198,175 |
|
|
|
245,786 |
|
Trading securities sold, but not yet purchased |
|
|
328,049 |
|
|
|
332,204 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
118,617 |
|
|
|
171,551 |
|
Other liabilities and accrued expenses |
|
|
171,602 |
|
|
|
138,122 |
|
Liabilities held for sale |
|
|
120,815 |
|
|
|
145,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,344,514 |
|
|
|
1,419,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debt |
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares authorized: 100,000,000 at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued: 19,487,319 at June 30, 2006 and 19,487,319 at December 31, 2005; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding: 18,556,143 at June 30, 2006 and 18,365,177 at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
721,660 |
|
|
|
704,005 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
118,425 |
|
|
|
90,431 |
|
Less common stock held in treasury, at cost: 931,176 shares at June 30, 2006 and 1,122,142 at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
(29,429 |
) |
|
|
(35,422 |
) |
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(3,422 |
) |
|
|
(4,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
807,429 |
|
|
|
754,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
2,331,943 |
|
|
$ |
2,354,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
Piper Jaffray Companies
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking |
|
$ |
61,236 |
|
|
$ |
47,958 |
|
|
$ |
131,000 |
|
|
$ |
96,502 |
|
Institutional brokerage |
|
|
40,898 |
|
|
|
42,401 |
|
|
|
87,172 |
|
|
|
79,223 |
|
Interest |
|
|
13,521 |
|
|
|
10,835 |
|
|
|
28,065 |
|
|
|
20,658 |
|
Other income |
|
|
(1,262 |
) |
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
11,268 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
114,393 |
|
|
|
102,141 |
|
|
|
257,505 |
|
|
|
197,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
9,143 |
|
|
|
7,909 |
|
|
|
17,296 |
|
|
|
15,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
105,250 |
|
|
|
94,232 |
|
|
|
240,209 |
|
|
|
182,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
60,653 |
|
|
|
53,998 |
|
|
|
133,577 |
|
|
|
104,613 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
6,718 |
|
|
|
7,879 |
|
|
|
14,827 |
|
|
|
15,202 |
|
Communications |
|
|
5,593 |
|
|
|
6,097 |
|
|
|
10,976 |
|
|
|
12,398 |
|
Floor brokerage and clearance |
|
|
3,373 |
|
|
|
3,963 |
|
|
|
6,048 |
|
|
|
7,449 |
|
Marketing and business development |
|
|
6,122 |
|
|
|
5,226 |
|
|
|
11,301 |
|
|
|
10,966 |
|
Outside services |
|
|
6,836 |
|
|
|
6,460 |
|
|
|
13,128 |
|
|
|
11,674 |
|
Cash award program |
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
2,161 |
|
|
|
2,197 |
|
Restructuring-related expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,595 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
2,910 |
|
|
|
2,811 |
|
|
|
7,347 |
|
|
|
6,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expenses |
|
|
93,091 |
|
|
|
96,090 |
|
|
|
199,365 |
|
|
|
179,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations before
income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
12,159 |
|
|
|
(1,858 |
) |
|
|
40,844 |
|
|
|
3,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
4,230 |
|
|
|
(750 |
) |
|
|
14,209 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
7,929 |
|
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
|
|
26,635 |
|
|
|
2,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(3,792 |
) |
|
|
2,345 |
|
|
|
1,359 |
|
|
|
6,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
4,137 |
|
|
$ |
1,237 |
|
|
$ |
27,994 |
|
|
$ |
8,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per basic common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
1.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
Income /(loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.20 |
) |
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per basic common share |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per diluted common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per diluted common share |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
18,556 |
|
|
|
19,028 |
|
|
|
18,509 |
|
|
|
19,141 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
19,669 |
|
|
|
19,195 |
|
|
|
19,408 |
|
|
|
19,297 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
Piper Jaffray Companies
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
27,994 |
|
|
$ |
8,572 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,874 |
|
|
|
8,749 |
|
Disposal of fixed assets |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(8,797 |
) |
|
|
(2,947 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
14,634 |
|
|
|
9,167 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
Forgivable loan reserve |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in operating assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers |
|
|
14,402 |
|
|
|
(39,813 |
) |
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations |
|
|
162,667 |
|
|
|
196,457 |
|
Deposits with clearing organizations |
|
|
6,039 |
|
|
|
2,750 |
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
(21,039 |
) |
|
|
(92,475 |
) |
Net trading securities owned |
|
|
(40,567 |
) |
|
|
(136,516 |
) |
Other receivables |
|
|
(12,982 |
) |
|
|
(4,466 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(11,487 |
) |
|
|
1,593 |
|
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers |
|
|
12,810 |
|
|
|
92,687 |
|
Checks and drafts |
|
|
(17,163 |
) |
|
|
(10,593 |
) |
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations |
|
|
8,455 |
|
|
|
(3,517 |
) |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
13,839 |
|
|
|
(5,009 |
) |
Accrued compensation |
|
|
(44,106 |
) |
|
|
(75,240 |
) |
Other liabilities and accrued expenses |
|
|
33,826 |
|
|
|
2,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
147,758 |
|
|
|
(47,490 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of fixed assets, net |
|
|
(5,281 |
) |
|
|
(8,526 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(5,281 |
) |
|
|
(8,526 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in securities loaned |
|
|
(4,559 |
) |
|
|
61,383 |
|
Decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
(61,450 |
) |
|
|
(48,702 |
) |
Increase in short-term bank financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,000 |
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,397 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(66,009 |
) |
|
|
27,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency adjustment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
77,298 |
|
|
|
(28,732 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
60,869 |
|
|
|
67,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
138,167 |
|
|
$ |
38,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
22,063 |
|
|
$ |
16,480 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
24,588 |
|
|
$ |
10,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash financing activities - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock for retirement plan obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,966 shares and 331,434 shares for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively |
|
$ |
9,013 |
|
|
$ |
13,187 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Background and Basis of Presentation
Background
Piper Jaffray Companies is the parent company of Piper Jaffray & Co. (Piper Jaffray), a
securities broker dealer and investment banking firm; Piper Jaffray Ltd., a firm providing
securities brokerage and investment banking services in Europe through an office located in London,
England; Piper Jaffray Financial Products Inc., an entity that facilitates customer derivative
transactions; Piper Jaffray Financial Products II Inc., an entity dealing primarily in variable
rate municipal products; and other immaterial subsidiaries. Piper Jaffray Companies and its
subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) operate as one reporting segment providing investment
banking services and institutional sales, trading and research services. As discussed more fully in
Note 13, the Company announced the sale of its Private Client Services branch network business in
the second quarter of 2006 and will exit the Private Client Services business when the sale closes,
which currently is expected to occur in the third quarter of 2006.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Piper Jaffray Companies, its
wholly owned subsidiaries and other entities in which the Company has a controlling financial
interest. All material intercompany balances have been eliminated. Certain financial information
for prior periods has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) with respect to Form 10-Q and reflect
all adjustments that in the opinion of management are normal and recurring and that are necessary
for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. In accordance with these
rules and regulations, certain disclosures that are normally included in annual financial
statements have been omitted. The consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. These principles require management to make certain estimates and
assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the
consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The nature of the Companys
business is such that the results of any interim period may not be indicative of the results to be
expected for a full year.
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Refer to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, for a
full summary of the Companys significant accounting policies. Updates to the Companys significant
accounting policies are described below.
Revenue Recognition
Investment Banking Investment banking revenues, which include underwriting fees, management
fees and advisory fees, are recorded when services for the transactions are completed under the
terms of each engagement. Expenses associated with such transactions are deferred until the
related revenue is recognized or the engagement is otherwise concluded. Investment banking
revenues are presented net of related expenses.
Institutional Brokerage Institutional brokerage revenues include (i) commissions paid by
customers for the execution of brokerage transactions in listed and overthecounter (OTC) equity,
fixed income and convertible debt securities, which are recorded on a trade date basis; (ii)
trading gains and losses which result from market making activities and from the Companys
commitment of capital to facilitate customer transactions; and (iii) fees paid to the Company for
equity research.
5
Other Assets
Other assets includes investments in partnerships, investments to fund deferred compensation
liabilities, prepaid expenses, and net deferred tax assets. In addition, other assets includes
55,440 restricted shares of NYSE Group, Inc. On March 7, 2006, upon the consummation of the merger
of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (NYSE) and Archipelago Holdings, Inc., NYSE Group, Inc.
became the parent company of New York Stock Exchange, LLC (which is the successor to the NYSE) and
Archipelago Holdings, Inc. In connection with the merger, the Company received $0.8 million in cash
and 157,202 shares of NYSE Group, Inc. common stock in exchange for the two NYSE seats owned by the
Company. The Company sold 101,762 shares of NYSE Group, Inc. common stock in a secondary offering
during the second quarter of 2006.
Note 3 Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No.
48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement 109 (FIN
48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in accordance
with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a two-step process
to recognize and measure a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The first
step is recognition, whereby a determination is made whether it is more-likely-than-not that a tax
position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position. The
second step is to measure a tax position that meets the recognition threshold to determine the
amount of benefit to recognize. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is evaluating the impact
of FIN 48 on the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
Note 4 Derivatives
Derivative contracts are financial instruments such as forwards, futures, swaps or option
contracts that derive their value from underlying assets, reference rates, indices or a combination
of these factors. A derivative contract generally represents future commitments to purchase or sell
financial instruments at specified terms on a specified date or to exchange currency or interest
payment streams based on the contract or notional amount. Derivative contracts exclude certain cash
instruments, such as mortgage-backed securities, interest-only and principal-only obligations and
indexed debt instruments that derive their values or contractually required cash flows from the
price of some other security or index.
The Company uses interest rate swaps, interest rate locks, and forward contracts to facilitate
customer transactions and as a means to manage risk in certain inventory positions. The Company
also enters into interest rate swap agreements to manage interest rate exposure associated with
holding residual interest securities from its tender option bond program. As of June 30, 2006, and
December 31, 2005, the Company was counterparty to notional/contract amounts of $5.5 billion and
$4.6 billion, respectively, of derivative instruments.
The market or fair values related to derivative contract transactions are reported in trading
securities owned and trading securities sold, but not yet purchased on the consolidated statements
of financial condition and any unrealized gain or loss resulting from changes in fair values of
derivatives is recognized in institutional brokerage on the consolidated statements of operations.
Derivatives are reported on a net-by-counterparty basis when a legal right of offset exists under a
legally enforceable master netting agreement in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 39,
Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts.
Fair values for derivative contracts represent amounts estimated to be received from or paid
to a counterparty in settlement of these instruments. These derivatives are valued using quoted
market prices when available or pricing models based on the net present value of estimated future
cash flows. The valuation models used require inputs including contractual terms, market prices,
yield curves, credit curves and measures of volatility. The net fair value of derivative contracts
was approximately $28.0 million and $17.0 million as of June 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005,
respectively.
Note 5 Securitizations
In connection with its tender option bond program, as of June 30, 2006, the Company has
outstanding securitizations of $279.2 million of highly rated municipal bonds. Each municipal bond
is sold into a separate trust that is funded by the sale of variable rate certificates to
institutional customers seeking variable rate tax-free investment products. These variable rate
certificates reprice weekly. Securitization transactions meeting certain SFAS 140 criteria are
treated as sales, with the resulting gain included in institutional brokerage on the
6
consolidated statements of operations. If a securitization does
not meet the sale of asset requirements of SFAS 140, the transaction is recorded as a borrowing.
The Company retains a residual interest in each structure and accounts for the residual interest as
a trading security, which is recorded at fair value in trading securities owned on the consolidated
statements of financial condition. The fair value of retained interests was $1.3 million at June
30, 2006, with a weighted average life of 8.9 years. The fair value of retained interests is
estimated based on the present value of future cash flows using managements best estimates of the
key assumptionsexpected yield, credit losses of 0 percent and a 12 percent discount rate. The
Company receives a fee to remarket the variable rate certificates derived from the securitizations.
At June 30, 2006, the sensitivity of the current fair value of retained interests to immediate
10 percent and 20 percent adverse changes in the key economic assumptions was not material. The
sensitivity analysis does not include the offsetting benefit of financial instruments the Company
utilizes to economically hedge risks inherent in its retained interests and is hypothetical.
Changes in fair value based on a 10 percent or 20 percent variation in an assumption generally
cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the assumption to the change in
the fair value may not be linear. Also, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the
fair value of the retained interests is calculated independent of changes in any other assumption;
in practice, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which might magnify or
counteract the sensitivities. In addition, the sensitivity analysis does not consider any
corrective action that the Company might take to mitigate the impact of any adverse changes in key
assumptions.
Certain cash flow activity for the municipal bond securitizations described above during the
six months ended June 30, 2006 includes:
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from new securitizations |
|
$ |
7,578 |
|
Remarketing fees received |
|
|
68 |
|
Cash flows received on retained interests |
|
|
3,325 |
|
Three securitization transactions were designed such that they did not meet the asset sale
requirements of SFAS 140; therefore, the Company consolidated these trusts. As a result, the
Company has recorded an asset for the underlying bonds of approximately $51.0 million in trading
securities owned and a liability for the certificates sold by the trust for approximately $50.1
million in other liabilities and accrued expenses on the consolidated statement of financial
condition as of June 30, 2006. The Company has economically hedged the activities of these
securitizations with interest rate swaps, which have been recorded at fair value and resulted in an
asset of approximately $2.0 million at June 30, 2006.
The Company has contracted with a major third-party financial institution to act as the
liquidity provider for the Companys tender option bond securitized trusts. The Company has agreed
to reimburse this party for losses associated with providing liquidity to the trusts. The maximum
exposure to loss at June 30, 2006 was $251.0 million, representing the outstanding amount of all
trust certificates at that date. This exposure to loss is mitigated by the underlying municipal
bonds held in the trusts, which are either AAA or AA rated. These bonds had a market value of
approximately $256.6 million at June 30, 2006. The Company believes the likelihood it will be
required to fund the reimbursement agreement obligation under any provision of the arrangement is
remote, and accordingly, no liability for such guarantee has been recorded in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements.
7
Note 6 Trading Securities Owned and Trading Securities Sold, But Not Yet Purchased
Trading securities owned and trading securities sold, but not yet purchased were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
27,849 |
|
|
$ |
13,260 |
|
Convertible securities |
|
|
45,547 |
|
|
|
9,221 |
|
Fixed income securities |
|
|
107,005 |
|
|
|
68,017 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
278,677 |
|
|
|
329,057 |
|
U.S. government securities |
|
|
6,957 |
|
|
|
26,652 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
293,649 |
|
|
|
286,531 |
|
Other |
|
|
30,262 |
|
|
|
21,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
789,946 |
|
|
$ |
753,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold, but not yet purchased: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
44,854 |
|
|
$ |
8,367 |
|
Convertible securities |
|
|
5,040 |
|
|
|
2,572 |
|
Fixed income securities |
|
|
25,292 |
|
|
|
31,588 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
81,371 |
|
|
|
157,132 |
|
U.S. government securities |
|
|
158,119 |
|
|
|
127,833 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
10,515 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,858 |
|
|
|
4,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
328,049 |
|
|
$ |
332,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005, trading securities owned in the amount of $174.8
million and $236.6 million, respectively, have been pledged as collateral for the Companys secured
borrowings, repurchase agreements and securities loaned activities.
Trading securities sold, but not yet purchased represent obligations of the Company to deliver
the specified security at the contracted price, thereby creating a liability to purchase the
security in the market at prevailing prices. The Company is obligated to acquire the securities
sold short at prevailing market prices, which may exceed the amount reflected on the consolidated
statements of financial condition. The Company economically hedges changes in market value of its
trading securities owned utilizing trading securities sold, but not yet purchased, interest rate
swaps, futures and exchange-traded options. It is the Companys practice to economically hedge a
significant portion of its trading securities owned.
8
Note 7 Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The following table presents the changes in the carrying value of goodwill and intangible
assets for the six months ended June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing |
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Company |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
231,567 |
|
|
$ |
85,600 |
|
|
$ |
317,167 |
|
Goodwill acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
231,567 |
|
|
$ |
85,600 |
|
|
$ |
317,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
3,067 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,067 |
|
Intangible assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
(800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(800 |
) |
Impairment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
2,267 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over three years.
Note 8 Financing
The Company has uncommitted credit agreements with banks totaling $675 million at June 30,
2006, composed of $555 million in discretionary secured lines of which $0 was outstanding at June
30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and $120 million in discretionary unsecured lines of which $0 was
outstanding at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005. In addition, the Company has established
arrangements to obtain financing at the end of each business day using as collateral the Companys
securities held by its clearing bank and by another broker dealer. Repurchase agreements and
securities loaned to other broker dealers are also used as sources of funding.
Piper Jaffray has executed a $180 million subordinated loan agreement, which satisfies
provisions of Appendix D of SEC Rule 15c3-1 and has been approved by the NYSE and is therefore
allowable in Piper Jaffrays net capital computation. The entire amount of the subordinated debt
will mature in 2008. In April 2006, the Company announced its intention to repay in full the
outstanding balance of this subordinated debt following the closing of the sale of its Private
Client Services branch network, currently expected to occur in the third quarter of 2006.
The Companys subordinated debt and short-term financing bear interest at rates based on the
London Interbank Offered Rate or federal funds rate. At June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the
weighted average interest rate on borrowings was 6.33 percent and 5.55 percent, respectively. At
June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, no formal compensating balance agreements existed, and the
Company was in compliance with all debt covenants related to these facilities.
Note 9 Legal Contingencies
The Company has been the subject of customer complaints and also has been named as a defendant
in various legal proceedings arising primarily from securities brokerage and investment banking
activities, including certain class actions that primarily allege
violations of securities laws and seek unspecified damages, which could be substantial. Also,
the Company is involved from time to time in investigations and proceedings by governmental
agencies and self-regulatory organizations.
9
The Company has established reserves for potential losses that are probable and reasonably
estimable that may result from pending and potential complaints, legal actions, investigations and
proceedings. In addition to the Companys established reserves, U.S. Bancorp (USB) has agreed to
indemnify the Company in an amount up to $17.5 million for certain legal and regulatory matters.
Approximately $13.3 million of this amount remained available as of June 30, 2006.
Given uncertainties regarding the timing, scope, volume and outcome of pending and potential
litigation, arbitration and regulatory proceedings and other factors, the amounts of reserves are
difficult to determine and of necessity subject to future revision. Subject to the foregoing,
management of the Company believes, based on its current knowledge, after consultation with outside
legal counsel and after taking into account its established reserves and the USB indemnity
agreement, that pending legal actions, investigations and proceedings will be resolved with no
material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company. However, if during any period a
potential adverse contingency should become probable or resolved for an amount in excess of the
established reserves and indemnification, the results of operations in that period could be
materially adversely affected.
Note 10 Net Capital Requirements and Other Regulatory Matters
As a registered broker dealer and member firm of the NYSE, Piper Jaffray is subject to the
Uniform Net Capital Rule of the SEC and the net capital rule of the NYSE. Piper Jaffray has elected
to use the alternative method permitted by the SEC rule, which requires that it maintain minimum
net capital of the greater of $1.0 million or 2 percent of aggregate debit balances arising from
customer transactions, as such term is defined in the SEC rule. Under the NYSE rule, the NYSE may
prohibit a member firm from expanding its business or paying dividends if resulting net capital
would be less than 5 percent of aggregate debit balances. Advances to affiliates, repayment of
subordinated debt, dividend payments and other equity withdrawals by Piper Jaffray are subject to
certain notification and other provisions of the SEC and NYSE rules. In addition, Piper Jaffray is
subject to certain notification requirements related to withdrawals of excess net capital.
At June 30, 2006, net capital under the SEC rule was $335.2 million, or 63.2 percent of
aggregate debit balances, and $324.6 million in excess of the minimum net capital required under
the SEC rule.
Piper Jaffray is also registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and
therefore is subject to CFTC regulations.
Piper Jaffray Ltd., which is a registered United Kingdom broker dealer, is subject to the
capital requirements of the United Kingdom Financial Services Authority (FSA). As of June 30,
2006, Piper Jaffray Ltd. was in compliance with the capital requirements of the FSA.
Note 11 Stock-Based Compensation and Cash Award Program
The Company maintains one stock-based compensation plan, the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended
and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan. The plan permits the grant of equity awards,
including non-qualified stock options and restricted stock, to the Companys employees and
directors for up to 4.5 million shares of common stock. In 2004, 2005 and 2006, the Company has
granted shares of restricted stock and options to purchase Piper Jaffray Companies common stock to
employees and granted options to purchase Piper Jaffray Companies common stock to its non-employee
directors. The Company believes that such awards help align the interests of employees and
directors with those of shareholders and serve as an employee retention tool. The awards granted to
employees have three-year cliff vesting periods. The director awards are fully vested upon grant.
The maximum term of the stock options granted to employees and directors is ten years. The plan
provides for accelerated vesting of option and restricted stock awards if there is a change in
control of the Company (as defined in the plan), in the event of a participants death, and at the
discretion of the compensation committee of the Companys board of directors.
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation under the fair
value method of accounting as prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123,
Accounting and Disclosure of Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and
Disclosure. As such, the Company had recorded stock-based compensation expense in the consolidated
statement of operations at fair value, net of estimated forfeitures.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123(R) (SFAS 123(R)), Share-Based Payment, using the modified
prospective transition method. SFAS 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on fair
value, net of estimated forfeitures. Because the Company historically expensed all equity awards
based on the fair value method, net of estimated forfeitures, SFAS 123(R) did not have a material
effect on the Companys measurement or recognition methods for stock-based compensation.
10
Employee and director stock options granted prior to January 1, 2006, were expensed by the
Company on a straight-line basis over the option vesting period, based on the estimated fair value
of the award on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Employee and director
stock options granted after January 1, 2006, are expensed by the Company on a straight-line basis
over the required service period, based on the estimated fair value of the award on the date of
grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. At the time it adopted SFAS 123(R), the Company
changed the expensing period from the vesting period to the required service period, which
shortened the period over which options are expensed for employees who are retiree-eligible on the
date of grant or become retiree-eligible during the vesting period. The number of employees that
fell within this category at January 1, 2006 was not material. In accordance with SEC guidelines,
the Company did not alter the expense recorded in connection with prior option grants for the
change in the expensing period.
Employee restricted stock grants prior to January 1, 2006, are amortized on a straight-line
basis over the vesting period based on the market price of Piper Jaffray Companies common stock on
the date of grant. Restricted stock grants after January 1, 2006, are valued at the market price of
the Companys common stock on the date of grant and amortized on a straight-line basis over the
required service period. The majority of the Companys restricted stock grants provide for
continued vesting after termination, providing the employee does not violate non-competition and
certain other post-termination restrictions, as set forth in the award agreements. The Company
considers the required service period to be the greater of the vesting period or the
non-competition period. The Company believes that the non-competition restrictions meet the SFAS
123(R) definition of a substantive service requirement.
The Company recorded compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, of $8.0 million and
$5.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $14.6 million and
$9.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, related to employee
stock option and restricted stock grants. The tax benefit recognized related to the total
compensation cost for stock-based compensation arrangements totaled $3.1 million and $2.1 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $5.6 million and $3.5 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model using assumptions such as the risk-free interest rate, the dividend yield, the
expected volatility and the expected life of the option. The risk-free interest rate assumption is
based on the U.S. treasury bill rate with a maturity equal to the expected life of the option. The
dividend yield assumption is based on the assumed dividend payout over the expected life of the
option. The expected volatility assumption is based on industry comparisons. The Company has only
been a publicly traded company for approximately 30 months; therefore, it does not have sufficient
historical data to determine an appropriate expected volatility. The expected life assumption is
based on an average of the following two factors: 1) industry comparisons; and 2) the guidance
provided by the SEC in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107). SAB 107 allows the use of an
acceptable methodology under which the Company can take the midpoint of the vesting date and the
full contractual term. The following table provides a summary of the valuation assumptions used by
the Company to determine the estimated value of stock option grants in Piper Jaffray Companies
common stock for the six months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average assumptions in option valuation |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Risk-free interest rates |
|
|
4.55 |
% |
|
|
3.77 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Stock volatility factor |
|
|
40.08 |
% |
|
|
38.11 |
% |
Expected life of options (in years) |
|
|
5.53 |
|
|
|
5.86 |
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted |
|
$ |
22.14 |
|
|
$ |
16.66 |
|
11
The following table summarizes the Companys stock options outstanding for the six months
ended June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Term (Years) |
|
|
Value |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
643,032 |
|
|
$ |
42.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
50,560 |
|
|
|
53.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled |
|
|
(56,127 |
) |
|
|
42.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
637,465 |
|
|
$ |
43.15 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
$ |
11,511,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
65,947 |
|
|
$ |
43.16 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,190,263 |
|
As of June 30, 2006, there was $4.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
stock options expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years.
The following table summarizes the Companys nonvested restricted stock for the six months
ended June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Nonvested |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
1,417,444 |
|
|
$ |
41.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
823,334 |
|
|
|
48.00 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(1,080 |
) |
|
|
45.24 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(56,055 |
) |
|
|
44.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
2,183,643 |
|
|
$ |
43.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006, there was $58.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to restricted stock expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.0 years.
Approximately $12.3 million of this unrecognized compensation is expected to be forfeited at the close of the
PCS sale to UBS.
In connection with the Companys spin-off from USB, it established a cash award program
pursuant to which it granted cash awards to a broad-based group of employees. The cash award
program was intended to aid in retention of employees and to compensate employees for the value of
USB stock options and restricted stock lost by employees. The cash awards are being expensed over a
four-year period ending December 31, 2007. Participants must be employed on the date of payment to
receive the award. Expense related to the cash award program is included as a separate line item on the Companys
consolidated statements of operations.
Note 12 Shareholders Equity
Issuance of Shares
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company reissued 190,966 common shares out of
treasury in fulfillment of $9.0 million in obligations under the Piper Jaffray Companies Retirement
Plan.
12
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated
by adjusting the weighted average outstanding shares to assume conversion of all potentially
dilutive restricted stock and stock options. The computation of earnings per share is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Net income |
|
$ |
4,137 |
|
|
$ |
1,237 |
|
|
$ |
27,994 |
|
|
$ |
8,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares for basic and diluted calculations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares used in basic computation |
|
|
18,556 |
|
|
|
19,028 |
|
|
|
18,509 |
|
|
|
19,141 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock |
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
Average shares used in diluted computation |
|
|
19,669 |
|
|
|
19,195 |
|
|
|
19,408 |
|
|
|
19,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
Note 13 Discontinued Operations
On April 10, 2006, the Company and UBS Financial Services Inc., a subsidiary of UBS AG,
entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the Agreement) pursuant to which UBS has agreed to
purchase the branch network of the Private Client Services (PCS) business and certain assets of
that business consisting primarily of customer collateralized margin loans (as disclosed in the
Companys Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 11, 2006). The Companys board of directors and
management completed an analysis of the long-term prospects of the PCS business and concluded that
the sale of PCS was in the best interest of shareholders and PCS clients. The Company intends to
use the sale proceeds to grow and enhance its existing capital markets business, expand into new
businesses that support the Companys strategic priorities, and to pay down debt and repurchase
common stock. The purchase price under the Agreement is $800 million, which includes $500 million
for the branch network and approximately $300 million for the net assets of the branch network. In
addition, the agreement provides for additional cash consideration of up to $75 million dependent
on post-closing performance of the transferred business; at present, however, the Company
anticipates realizing only a portion, if any, of such additional cash consideration. The Company
currently expects the transaction covered by the agreement to close in the third quarter of 2006,
subject to certain regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions.
In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144,) the results of PCS
operations, as summarized below, have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods
presented and the related assets and liabilities included in the sale as held for sale. In
connection with the sale of the Companys PCS business the Company has approved a plan to
significantly restructure the Companys support infrastructure. As described more fully in Note
14, the Company incurred $16.2 million in costs related to the restructuring plan in the three
months ended June 30, 2006. In addition, the Company incurred $1.0 million of transaction costs
related to the sale of the PCS business for the three months ended June 30, 2006. These
restructuring and transaction costs are included within discontinued operations in accordance with
SFAS 144.
13
Results from discontinued operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
PCS net revenues |
|
$ |
89,195 |
|
|
$ |
85,433 |
|
|
$ |
181,790 |
|
|
$ |
176,164 |
|
PCS operating expenses |
|
|
77,511 |
|
|
|
81,983 |
|
|
|
161,910 |
|
|
|
166,371 |
|
Restructuring costs |
|
|
16,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction costs |
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
(5,464 |
) |
|
|
3,450 |
|
|
|
2,732 |
|
|
|
9,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
(1,672 |
) |
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
3,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
(3,792 |
) |
|
$ |
2,345 |
|
|
$ |
1,359 |
|
|
$ |
6,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has included the following assets and liabilities as held for sale in
connection with the sale of the PCS branch network to UBS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer receivables |
|
$ |
394,899 |
|
|
$ |
418,566 |
|
Fixed assets (net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization of $23,114 and $22,371, respectively) |
|
|
14,842 |
|
|
|
13,372 |
|
Employee forgiveable loans |
|
|
8,704 |
|
|
|
9,984 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
1,410 |
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets held for sale |
|
$ |
419,855 |
|
|
$ |
442,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Liabilities held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer payables |
|
$ |
118,193 |
|
|
$ |
142,871 |
|
Other payables |
|
|
2,622 |
|
|
|
2,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities held for sale |
|
$ |
120,815 |
|
|
$ |
145,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 14 Restructuring
The Company incurred pre-tax restructuring costs of $16.2 million in the second quarter of
2006 in connection with the pending sale of the Companys PCS branch network to a subsidiary of UBS
AG. The expense was incurred upon implementation of a specific restructuring plan to reorganize
the Companys support infrastructure.
The restructuring charge incurred to date includes the cost of severance, other benefits and
outplacement costs associated with the termination of employees. The severance amounts were
determined based on a one-time severance benefit enhancement to the
Companys existing severance pay program in place at the time of termination notification and
will be paid out over a benefit period of up to one year from the time of termination.
Approximately 315 employees will receive severance. The following table presents a summary of
activity with respect to the restructuring-related liability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
|
|
Provision charged to operating expense |
|
|
16,191 |
|
Cash outlays |
|
|
|
|
Noncash write-downs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
16,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company anticipates recording additional restructuring charges in the second half of 2006
of approximately $44 million, the majority of which will be in the third quarter of 2006.
14
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following information should be read in conjunction with the accompanying
consolidated financial statements and related notes and exhibits included elsewhere in this report.
Certain statements in this report may be considered forward-looking. Statements that are not
historical or current facts, including statements about beliefs and expectations, are
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements cover, among other things, the future
prospects of Piper Jaffray Companies. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and
uncertainties, and important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those
anticipated, including those factors discussed below under External Factors Impacting Our
Business as well as under Risk Factors in Part 1, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2005, as updated in our subsequent reports filed with the SEC,
including the updates found in Part II, Item 1A of this report on Form 10-Q. These reports are
available at our Web site at www.piperjaffray.com and at the SEC Web site at www.sec.gov.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation
to update them in light of new information or future events.
Executive Overview
Our continuing operations are principally engaged in providing investment banking,
institutional brokerage and related financial services to corporations and public sector and
non-profit entities in the United States, with some activity in Europe. Revenues are generated
primarily through advisory and financing fees earned on investment banking and public finance
activities, commissions and sales credits earned on equity and fixed income transactions, and net
interest earned on securities inventories. While we maintain securities inventories primarily to
facilitate customer transactions, our capital markets business also realizes profits and losses
from trading activities related to these securities inventories.
The securities business is a human capital business; accordingly, compensation and benefits
comprise the largest component of our expenses, and our performance is dependent upon our ability
to attract, develop and retain highly skilled employees who are motivated to serve the best
interests of our clients, thereby serving the best interests of our company.
Our discontinued operations consist of our retail brokerage business, which provides financial
advice and a wide range of financial products and services to individual investors through our
network of branch offices. Revenues are generated primarily through commissions earned on equity
and fixed income transactions and for distribution of mutual funds and annuities, fees earned on
fee-based client accounts and net interest from customers margin loan balances.
On April 10, 2006, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell 100 percent of our Private
Client Services (PCS) branch network to a subsidiary of UBS AG. The purchase price under the
agreement is $800 million, which includes $500 million for the branch network and approximately
$300 million for the net assets of the branch network. In addition, the agreement provides for
additional cash consideration of up to $75 million depending on post-closing performance of the
transferred business; at present, however, we anticipate realizing only a portion, if any, of such
additional cash consideration. Excluding the potential additional consideration of up to $75
million, we currently expect the sale to result in after-tax proceeds of approximately $510 million
and an after-tax book gain of approximately $170 million, net of approximately $60 million in
restructuring charges. The sale is expected to close in the third quarter of 2006.
In light of the pending sale of our PCS branch network, the PCS results of operations are
accounted for as discontinued operations. We now operate through a single reporting segment
representing our capital markets focused business. See Notes 13 and 14 to our unaudited financial
statements for a further discussion of our discontinued operations and restructuring.
We anticipate utilizing the after-tax proceeds from the sale to accelerate the growth of our
existing capital markets business and to enter new businesses to support our strategic priorities.
In addition, we expect to significantly change our capitalization structure by repaying $180
million in subordinated debt and repurchasing up to $180 in common stock, to be effected through a
combination of an accelerated share repurchase and open market purchases.
Our divestiture of the PCS branch network will have a material impact on our results of
operations and financial condition. We anticipate the most material of the changes to our
statement of financial condition to be as follows: most of our customer receivables and payables
will be eliminated, goodwill related to PCS of $85.6 million will be written-off, and our
subordinated debt will be repaid. Our results of operations have been reclassified to present PCS
results within discontinued operations. In the near term, we expect continuing operations to have
an increase in net interest income as we invest the excess cash proceeds from the sale prior to
making any business investments and due to the
15
elimination of our subordinated debt. We also expect
to use up to $180 million of the sale proceeds to repurchase common stock. In addition, certain
equity awards granted to PCS employees will be forfeited upon their transfer to UBS, and other
awards will become vested.
RESULTS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
For the three months ended June 30, 2006, our net income, which includes both continuing and
discontinued operations, was $4.1 million, or $0.21 per diluted share, up from net income of $1.2
million, or $0.06 per diluted share, for the year-ago period. The second quarter of 2006 included
a restructuring charge and transaction costs related to the pending sale of the PCS branch network;
the restructuring charge and transaction costs reduced net income by $10.6 million after tax, or
$0.54 per diluted share. The second quarter of 2005 results included a pre-tax restructuring
charge of $8.6 million, or $0.29 per diluted share after tax, related to implementing certain
expense reduction measures. For the quarter ended June 30, 2006, net income from continuing
operations totaled $7.9 million, up from a net loss of $1.1 million in the year-ago period, on net
revenues of $105.3 million, up 11.7 percent from $94.2 million for the same quarter last year.
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations were $0.40, up from a loss of $0.06 per share
in the prior-year quarter.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, our net income increased to $28.0 million from $8.6
million for the corresponding period in the prior year, resulting in diluted earnings per share of
$1.44 and $0.44, respectively. Net revenues from continuing operations for the first six months of
2006 increased 31.6 percent to $240.2 million, compared to $182.6 million for the first six months
of 2005. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, net income from continuing operations increased
to $26.6 million from $2.3 million for the corresponding period in the prior year, resulting in
diluted earnings per share of $1.37 and $0.12, respectively.
EXTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING OUR BUSINESS
Performance in the financial services industry in which we operate is highly correlated to the
overall strength of economic conditions and financial market activity. Overall market conditions
are a product of many factors, which are mostly unpredictable and beyond our control. These factors
may affect the financial decisions made by investors, including their level of participation in the
financial markets. In turn, these decisions may affect our business results. With respect to
financial market activity, our profitability is sensitive to a variety of factors, including the
volume and value of trading in securities, the volatility of the equity and fixed income markets,
the commission charged for trade execution, the level and shape of various yield curves and the
demand for investment banking services as reflected by the number and size of public offerings and
merger and acquisition transactions.
Factors that differentiate our business within the financial services industry also may affect
our financial results. For example, our business focuses primarily on specific sectors such as the
consumer, financial institutions, health care and technology industries within the corporate sector
and on health care, higher education, housing, and state and local government entities within the
government/non-profit sector. These sectors may experience growth or downturns independently of
general economic and market conditions, or may face market conditions that are disproportionately
better or worse than those impacting the economy and markets generally. In either case, our
business could be affected differently than overall market trends. Given the variability of the
capital markets and securities businesses, our earnings may fluctuate significantly from period to
period, and results of any individual period should not be considered indicative of future results.
16
Results of Operations
FINANCIAL SUMMARY FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005
The following table provides a summary of the results of our operations and the results of our
operations as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as a Percentage of Net |
|
|
|
Results of Operations |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
v2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking |
|
$ |
61,236 |
|
|
$ |
47,958 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
% |
|
|
58.2 |
% |
|
|
50.9 |
% |
Institutional brokerage |
|
|
40,898 |
|
|
|
42,401 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
Interest |
|
|
13,521 |
|
|
|
10,835 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
Other income |
|
|
(1,262 |
) |
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
114,393 |
|
|
|
102,141 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
108.7 |
|
|
|
108.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
9,143 |
|
|
|
7,909 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
105,250 |
|
|
|
94,232 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
60,653 |
|
|
|
53,998 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
57.6 |
|
|
|
57.3 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
6,718 |
|
|
|
7,879 |
|
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
Communications |
|
|
5,593 |
|
|
|
6,097 |
|
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
Floor brokerage and clearance |
|
|
3,373 |
|
|
|
3,963 |
|
|
|
(14.9 |
) |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Marketing and business development |
|
|
6,122 |
|
|
|
5,226 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Outside services |
|
|
6,836 |
|
|
|
6,460 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
Cash award program |
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Restructuring expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,595 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
2,910 |
|
|
|
2,811 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expenses |
|
|
93,091 |
|
|
|
96,090 |
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
88.4 |
|
|
|
102.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations before tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
12,159 |
|
|
|
(1,858 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
4,230 |
|
|
|
(750 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
7,929 |
|
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(3,792 |
) |
|
|
2,345 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,137 |
|
|
$ |
1,237 |
|
|
|
234.4 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was significantly impacted by $17.1
million of pre-tax restructuring and transaction costs included within discontinued operations
related to the pending sale of the PCS branch network. Net income for the year-ago period was
impacted by $8.6 million of pre-tax restructuring-related expenses incurred in that quarter to
implement certain expense reduction measures. For the three months ended June 30, 2006, investment
banking revenues increased 27.7 percent to $61.2 million, compared with revenues of $48.0 million
in the prior-year period; the increase in revenues was due to an increase in equity underwriting and advisory services activity.
17
Institutional brokerage revenues decreased 3.5 percent from the
prior-year period to $40.9 million as a result of decreased equity commissions. For the second
quarter of 2006, net interest income increased to $4.4 million, up from $2.9 million for the second
quarter of 2005. This increase was due to the impact of rising short-term interest rates on net
inventories and other net earning assets, and the growth in sales of interest-rate products. Other
income for the three months ended June 30, 2006 reflects a loss of $1.3 million, primarily
resulting from losses we recognized due to a decrease in the market value of NYSE Group, Inc.
restricted shares held by us, approximately two-thirds of which we sold during the quarter in a
NYSE Group, Inc. secondary offering. For the three months ended June 30, 2006, non-interest
expenses from continuing operations were $93.1 million, down 3.1 percent from $96.1 million for the
year-ago period. This decrease was principally the result of the $8.6 million restructuring charge
taken in the second quarter of 2005, offset in part by increased variable compensation and benefits
expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2006, due to higher revenues and profitability.
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
Compensation and Benefits
Compensation and benefits expenses, which are the largest component of our expenses, include
salaries, commissions, bonuses, benefits, employment taxes and other employee costs. A substantial
portion of compensation expense is comprised of variable incentive arrangements, including
discretionary bonuses, the amount of which fluctuates in proportion to the level of business
activity, increasing with higher revenues and operating profits. Other compensation costs,
primarily base salaries and benefits, are more fixed in nature.
For the three months ended June 30, 2006, compensation and benefits expenses increased 12.3
percent to $60.7 million, from $54.0 million for the prior-year period due primarily to higher
variable compensation resulting from increased net revenues and profitability. Compensation and
benefits expenses as a percentage of net revenues increased slightly to 57.6 percent, compared to
57.3 percent for the second quarter of 2005.
Occupancy and Equipment
For the three months ended June 30, 2006, occupancy and equipment expenses were $6.7 million,
compared with $7.9 million in the prior-year period. The decrease was attributable to prior
investments in technology becoming fully depreciated in the first quarter of 2006. In the fourth
quarter of 2006, we will be entering into a new lease contract related to our London office and
exiting our current lease contract. As a result, we will incur expense of approximately $1.5
million related to payment of the remaining 2006 lease payments, early exit penalties and leasehold
write-offs.
Communications
Communication expenses include costs for telecommunication and data communication, primarily
consisting of expense for obtaining third-party market data information. For the second quarter of
2006, communication expenses were $5.6 million, down 8.3 percent from the corresponding period in
the prior year. The decrease was due to costs savings associated with a change in vendors related
to our equity trading system and a portion of these costs now being recorded within outside
services.
Floor Brokerage and Clearance
For the three months ended June 30, 2006, floor brokerage and clearance expenses declined 14.9
percent to $3.4 million from the same period last year as a result of our continued efforts to
reduce expenses associated with accessing electronic communication networks.
Marketing and Business Development
Marketing and business development expenses include travel and entertainment, postage,
supplies and promotional and advertising costs. For the second quarter of 2006, marketing and
business development expenses increased 17.1 percent to $6.1 million, compared
with $5.2 million for the second quarter of 2005. This increase was driven by deal-related
travel and entertainment expense from higher equity underwriting and advisory services activity in
the second quarter of 2006.
18
Outside Services
Outside services expenses include securities processing expenses, outsourced technology and
operations functions, outside legal fees and other professional fees. For the three months ended
June 30, 2006, outside services expenses increased modestly to $6.8 million, compared with $6.5
million in the prior-year period due to services associated with our equity trading system being
bundled and provided by a single vendor. Previously, these services were provided by multiple
vendors and were recorded in communications and floor brokerage and clearing expenses, as well as
outside services.
Cash Award Program
In connection with our spin-off from U.S. Bancorp, we established a cash award program
pursuant to which we granted cash awards to a broad-based group of our employees. The award program
was designed to aid in retention of employees and to compensate for the value of U.S. Bancorp stock
options and restricted stock lost by our employees as a result of the spin-off. The cash awards are
being expensed over a four-year period ending December 31, 2007. The sale of the PCS branch
network will result in the forfeiture and accelerated vesting of a significant number of cash
awards, resulting in a decrease to our ongoing cash award expense. We anticipate incurring
approximately $0.8 million and $0.6 million of cash award expense within continuing operations in
the third and fourth quarters of 2006, respectively. We anticipate incurring approximately $2.0
million of cash awards expense in 2007.
Restructuring-Related Expense
In the second quarter of 2005, we implemented certain expense reduction measures as a means to
better align our cost infrastructure with our revenues. This resulted in a pre-tax restructuring
charge of $8.6 million, consisting of $4.9 million in severance benefits and $3.7 million related
to the reduction of office space.
Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expenses include insurance costs, license and registration fees, expenses
related to our charitable giving program, amortization on intangible assets and litigation-related
expenses, which consist of the amounts we reserve and/or pay out related to legal and regulatory
matters. For the three months ended June 30, 2006, other operating expenses were essentially flat
at $2.9 million, compared with the prior-year period.
Income Taxes
For the three months ended June 30, 2006, income taxes from continuing operations were $4.2
million, an effective tax rate of 34.8 percent, compared with an income tax benefit of $0.8 million
and an effective tax rate of 40.4 percent, for the corresponding period in 2005. The 40.4 percent
effective tax rate for the year-ago period was not reflective of our 2005 annual effective tax rate
and was higher as the result of the loss in the year-ago period.
19
NET REVENUES FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS (DETAIL)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
v2005 |
|
Net revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional sales and trading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income |
|
$ |
16,621 |
|
|
$ |
17,391 |
|
|
|
(4.4 |
)% |
Equities |
|
|
31,530 |
|
|
|
30,029 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total institutional sales and trading |
|
|
48,151 |
|
|
|
47,420 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Investment banking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income |
|
|
15,675 |
|
|
|
19,758 |
|
|
|
(20.7 |
) |
Equities |
|
|
25,648 |
|
|
|
16,960 |
|
|
|
51.2 |
|
Advisory services |
|
|
19,913 |
|
|
|
11,240 |
|
|
|
77.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment banking |
|
|
61,236 |
|
|
|
47,958 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
Subordinated debt interest expense |
|
|
(2,875 |
) |
|
|
(2,093 |
) |
|
|
37.4 |
|
Other income |
|
|
(1,262 |
) |
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues |
|
$ |
105,250 |
|
|
$ |
94,232 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2006, net revenues were $105.3 million, up 11.7 percent
compared with the prior-year period.
Institutional sales and trading revenues comprise all the revenues generated through trading
activities, primarily the facilitation of customer trades. To assess the profitability of
institutional sales and trading activities, we aggregate institutional brokerage revenues with the
net interest income or expense associated with financing, economically hedging and holding long or
short inventory positions. Our results in the sales and trading area vary from quarter to quarter
with changes in trading margins, trading volumes and the timing of transactions as a result of
market opportunities. Increased price transparency in the fixed income market, pressure from
institutional clients in the equity market to reduce commissions and the use of alternative trading
systems in the equity market have put pressure on trading margins. We expect this pressure to
continue.
For the three months ended June 30, 2006, institutional sales and trading revenues were $48.2
million, a slight increase compared with $47.4 million recorded in the prior-year period as
increased equity sales and trading revenues were partially offset by a decline in fixed income
sales and trading. Fixed income institutional sales and trading revenues decreased 4.4 percent to
$16.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared with $17.4 million for the
corresponding period in 2005. This decrease was due primarily to a decline in sales of interest
rate products. Equity institutional sales and trading revenue increased 5.0 percent for the three
months ended June 30, 2006, to $31.5 million. We improved year-over-year performance through higher
convertible net revenues and incremental sales and trading revenue related to our European
expansion.
In the second quarter of 2006, investment banking revenues increased 27.7 percent to $61.2
million, compared with $48.0 million in the second quarter of 2005. This increase was driven by
strong demand for equity underwriting and advisory services. Equity underwriting revenues increased
51.2 percent to $25.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006. This increase was due to a
large convertible transaction and an increased volume of completed equity transactions. During the
three months ended June 30, 2006, we completed 20 equity offerings (10 lead-managed), raising $2.9
billion in capital for our clients, compared with 14 equity offerings (6 lead-managed), raising
$2.5 billion in capital, during the three months ended June 30, 2005. Advisory services revenues
increased 77.2 percent to $19.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 as merger and
acquisition activity remained strong. In the second quarter of 2006, we completed 9 mergers and
acquisitions transactions valued at $1.7 billion, compared with 6 deals valued at $0.6 billion in
the second quarter of 2005. Partially offsetting these increases was a decline in fixed income
underwriting revenues of 20.7 percent, compared to the record second quarter of 2005, due to fewer
municipal refinancing transactions.
Subordinated debt interest expense increased 37.4 percent from the year-ago period to $2.9
million due to increased short-term interest rates.
For the three months ended June 30, 2006, other income was a $1.3 million loss primarily
resulting from losses we recognized due to a decline in the market value of restricted NYSE Group,
Inc. shares held by us, approximately two-thirds of which we sold during the quarter.
20
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Discontinued operations include the operating results of our PCS business. On April 10, 2006,
we signed a definitive agreement to sell our PCS branch network and certain other assets of that
business to a subsidiary of UBS AG. We expect the transaction to close in the third quarter of
2006. In addition, discontinued operations include restructuring and transactions costs incurred
in connection with this pending sale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2006 vs. |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
PCS revenues |
|
$ |
89,195 |
|
|
$ |
85,433 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
PCS operating expenses |
|
|
77,511 |
|
|
|
81,983 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
Restructuring costs |
|
|
16,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M |
|
Transaction costs |
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
(5,464 |
) |
|
|
3,450 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
(1,672 |
) |
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
(3,792 |
) |
|
$ |
2,345 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of PCS financial advisors |
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
(14.7 |
)% |
(period end) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2006, PCS recorded pre-tax operating income before
restructuring and transaction costs of $11.7 million, compared with $3.5 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2005. PCS net revenues improved from the year-ago period due to increases in
fee-based revenues and increased net interest income due to increased short-term interest rates.
These increases were partially offset by reduced revenues from 14.7 percent fewer financial
advisors. A large portion of the decline in financial advisors is attributable to the pending sale
of the PCS branch network. PCS operating expenses declined 5.5 percent from the year-ago period
due to the cancellation of various PCS initiatives and the discontinuation of depreciation in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. See Note 13 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements
for further discussion.
In connection with the sale of our PCS branch network, we recorded $17.1 million in pre-tax
restructuring and transactions costs during the second quarter of 2006. See Note 14 to our
unaudited consolidated financial statements for further discussion of these costs.
21
FINANCIAL SUMMARY FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005
The following table provides a summary of the results of our operations and the results of our
operations as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations as a Percentage of Net |
|
|
|
Results of Operations |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
v2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking |
|
$ |
131,000 |
|
|
$ |
96,502 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
% |
|
|
54.5 |
% |
|
|
52.9 |
% |
Insititutional brokerage |
|
|
87,172 |
|
|
|
79,223 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
|
Interest |
|
|
28,065 |
|
|
|
20,658 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
Other income |
|
|
11,268 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
675.0 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
257,505 |
|
|
|
197,837 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
|
107.2 |
|
|
|
108.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
17,296 |
|
|
|
15,268 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
240,209 |
|
|
|
182,569 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
133,577 |
|
|
|
104,613 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
|
55.6 |
|
|
|
57.3 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
14,827 |
|
|
|
15,202 |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
Communications |
|
|
10,976 |
|
|
|
12,398 |
|
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
Floor brokerage and clearance |
|
|
6,048 |
|
|
|
7,449 |
|
|
|
(18.8 |
) |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Marketing and business development |
|
|
11,301 |
|
|
|
10,966 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Outside services |
|
|
13,128 |
|
|
|
11,674 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
Cash award program |
|
|
2,161 |
|
|
|
2,197 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Restructuring expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,595 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
7,347 |
|
|
|
6,197 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expenses |
|
|
199,365 |
|
|
|
179,291 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
83.0 |
|
|
|
98.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before tax expense |
|
|
40,844 |
|
|
|
3,278 |
|
|
|
1,146.0 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
14,209 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
1,345.5 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
|
26,635 |
|
|
|
2,295 |
|
|
|
1,060.6 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
1,359 |
|
|
|
6,277 |
|
|
|
(78.3 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
27,994 |
|
|
$ |
8,572 |
|
|
|
226.6 |
% |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Except as discussed below, the underlying reasons for variances to prior year are
substantially the same as the comparative quarterly discussion, and the statements in the foregoing
discussion also apply.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, net income, which includes both continuing and
discontinued operations, totaled $28.0 million, a 226.6 percent increase from the year-ago period
due to higher net revenues and reduced non-compensation expenses. Net revenues from continuing
operations increased to $240.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of 31.6
percent from the corresponding period in the prior year. Investment banking revenues increased 35.7
percent to $131.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with revenues of $96.5
million in the prior-year period. This increase was attributable to higher equity underwriting and
advisory services activity. Institutional brokerage revenues increased 10.0 percent over the
prior-year period to $87.2 million as a result of increased
22
equity commissions and increased
revenues related to our high-yield and structured products. Net interest income for the first six
months of 2006 increased to $10.8 million, up from $5.4 million for the first six months of 2005.
This increase was due to the impact of rising short-term interest rates on net inventories and the
growth in sales of interest-rate products. Other income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was
$11.3 million, compared with $1.5 million for the corresponding period in the prior year. The
increase was primarily due to a $9.1 million gain related to our ownership of two seats on the New
York Stock Exchange, which were exchanged for cash and restricted shares of the NYSE Group, Inc.
We sold approximately 65 percent of our NYSE Group, Inc. restricted shares in a secondary offering
during the second quarter of 2006. Non-interest expenses increased to $199.4 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006, from $179.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This
increase was attributable to increased variable compensation and benefits expenses due to higher
revenues and profitability, offset in part by an $8.6 million restructure charge taken in the
second quarter of 2005.
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
Occupancy and Equipment
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, occupancy and equipment decreased to $14.8 million,
compared with $15.2 million for the prior-year period. The decrease was primarily a result of a
reduction in office space, offset in part by a $0.4 million write-off of fixed assets in the first
quarter of 2006 in connection with modifications to our fixed income trading system.
Marketing and Business Development
Marketing and business development expenses include travel and entertainment, postage,
supplies and promotional and advertising costs. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, marketing
and business development expenses increased 3.1 percent to $11.3 million, compared with $11.0
million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This increase was due to increased travel and
entertainment expenses due to higher levels of equity underwriting and advisory service activity in
the first six months of 2006, partially offset by a $0.5 million sales and use tax refund received
in the first quarter of 2006 related to a favorable sales and use tax ruling.
Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expenses include insurance costs, license and registration fees, expenses
related to our charitable giving program, amortization on intangible assets and litigation-related
expenses, which consist of the amounts we reserve and/or pay out related to legal and regulatory
matters. For the second quarter of 2006, other operating expenses increased to $7.3 million,
compared with $6.2 million for the year-ago period. The 18.6 percent increase was primarily a
result of increased charitable giving expenses.
Income Taxes
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, income taxes from continuing operations were $14.2
million, an effective tax rate of 34.8 percent, compared with $1.0 million of income taxes and an
effective tax rate of 30.0 percent, for the corresponding period in 2005. The increased effective
tax rate is attributable to a decrease in the ratio of municipal interest income, which is
non-taxable, to total taxable income.
23
NET REVENUES FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS (DETAIL)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
v2005 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional sales and trading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income |
|
$ |
39,236 |
|
|
$ |
31,659 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
% |
Equities |
|
|
64,289 |
|
|
|
56,867 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total institutional sales and trading |
|
|
103,525 |
|
|
|
88,526 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
Investment banking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income |
|
|
31,427 |
|
|
|
31,390 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Equities |
|
|
55,691 |
|
|
|
37,298 |
|
|
|
49.3 |
|
Advisory services |
|
|
43,882 |
|
|
|
27,814 |
|
|
|
57.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment banking |
|
|
131,000 |
|
|
|
96,502 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
|
Subordinated debt interest expense |
|
|
(5,584 |
) |
|
|
(3,913 |
) |
|
|
42.7 |
|
Other income |
|
|
11,268 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
675.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues |
|
$ |
240,209 |
|
|
$ |
182,569 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, net revenues were $240.2 million, up 31.6 percent
compared with the corresponding period in the prior year.
Institutional sales and trading revenues comprise all the revenues generated through trading
activities, primarily the facilitation of customer trades. To assess the profitability of
institutional sales and trading activities, we aggregate institutional brokerage revenues with the
net interest income or expense associated with financing, economically hedging and holding long or
short inventory positions. Our results in the sales and trading area vary from quarter to quarter
with changes in trading margins, trading volumes and the timing of transactions as a result of
market opportunities. Increased price transparency in the fixed income market, pressure from
institutional clients in the equity market to reduce commissions and the use of alternative trading
systems in the equity market have put pressure on trading margins. We expect this pressure to
continue.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, institutional sales and trading revenues increased
16.9 percent to $103.5 million, compared with $88.5 million for the prior-year period. Fixed income
institutional sales and trading revenues increased 23.9 percent to $39.2 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2006, compared with $31.7 million for the corresponding period in 2005. We were able
to improve year-over-year performance through increased high-yield and structured product revenues.
Equity institutional sales and trading revenue increased 13.1 percent for the six months ended
June 30, 2006, to $64.3 million. This increase is attributed to higher convertible net revenues and
incremental sales and trading revenue related to our European expansion.
For the first six months of 2006, investment banking revenues increased 35.7 percent to $131.0
million, compared with $96.5 million in the first six months of 2005. This increase was driven by
strong increases in equity underwriting and advisory services. Equity underwriting revenues
increased 49.3 percent to $55.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. This increase was
due to an increased number of completed transactions. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, we
completed 45 equity offerings, raising $6.9 billion in capital for our clients, compared with 33
equity offerings, raising $4.7 billion in capital, during the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Advisory services revenues increased 57.8 percent to $43.9 million for the six months ended June
30, 2006 due to a strong market for merger and acquisition activity in the first half of 2006. We
completed 23 mergers and acquisitions transactions valued at $3.9 billion for the first six months
of 2006, compared with 15 deals valued at $2.0 billion for the first six months of 2005. Fixed
income underwriting revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006 were essentially flat to the
year-ago period. We have increased our market share of negotiated municipal underwriting during
2006, however, the overall par value of municipal offerings has declined during 2006.
24
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2006 vs. |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
PCS revenues |
|
$ |
181,790 |
|
|
$ |
176,164 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
PCS operating expenses |
|
|
161,910 |
|
|
|
166,371 |
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
Restructuring costs |
|
|
16,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M |
|
Transaction costs |
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before tax expense |
|
|
2,732 |
|
|
|
9,793 |
|
|
|
(72.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
3,516 |
|
|
|
(60.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
1,359 |
|
|
$ |
6,277 |
|
|
|
(78.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underlying reasons for fluctuations in PCS revenues and PCS operating expenses
between the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 are substantially the same as those described
in the comparative discussion for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recent accounting pronouncements are set forth in Note 3 to our unaudited consolidated
financial statements and are incorporated herein by reference.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our accounting and reporting policies comply with GAAP and conform to practices within
the securities industry. The preparation of financial statements in compliance with GAAP and
industry practices requires us to make estimates and assumptions that could materially affect
amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements. Critical accounting policies are those
policies that we believe to be the most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and
results of operations and that require us to make estimates that are difficult, subjective or
complex. Most accounting policies are not considered by us to be critical accounting policies.
Several factors are considered in determining whether or not a policy is critical, including, among
others, whether the estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements taken as a
whole, the nature of the estimates, the ability to readily validate the estimates with other
information, including third-party or independent sources, the sensitivity of the estimates to
changes in economic conditions and whether alternative accounting methods may be used under GAAP.
For a full description of our significant accounting policies, see Note 2 to our consolidated
financial statements included in our Annual Report to Shareholders on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005. We believe that of our significant accounting policies, the following are our
critical accounting policies:
VALUATION OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Trading securities owned, trading securities owned and pledged as collateral, and trading
securities sold, but not yet purchased on our consolidated statements of financial condition
consist of financial instruments recorded at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses related to
these financial instruments are reflected on our consolidated statements of operations.
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be
exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation
sale. When available, we use observable market prices, observable market parameters, or broker or
dealer prices (bid and ask prices) to derive the fair value of the instrument. In the case of
financial instruments transacted on recognized
25
exchanges, the observable market prices represent
quotations for completed transactions from the exchange on which the financial instrument is
principally traded. Bid prices represent the highest price a buyer is willing to pay for a
financial instrument at a particular time. Ask prices represent the lowest price a seller is
willing to accept for a financial instrument at a particular time.
A substantial percentage of the fair value of our trading securities owned, trading securities
owned and pledged as collateral, and trading securities sold, but not yet purchased are based on
observable market prices, observable market parameters, or derived from broker or dealer prices.
The availability of observable market prices and pricing parameters can vary from product to
product. Where available, observable market prices and pricing or market parameters in a product
may be used to derive a price without requiring significant judgment. In certain markets,
observable market prices or market parameters are not available for all products, and fair value is
determined using techniques appropriate for each particular product. These techniques involve some
degree of judgment.
For investments in illiquid or privately held securities that do not have readily determinable
fair values, the determination of fair value requires us to estimate the value of the securities
using the best information available. Among the factors considered by us in determining the fair
value of financial instruments are the cost, terms and liquidity of the investment, the financial
condition and operating results of the issuer, the quoted market price of publicly traded
securities with similar quality and yield, and other factors generally pertinent to the valuation
of investments. In instances where a security is subject to transfer restrictions, the value of the
security is based primarily on the quoted price of a similar security without restriction but may
be reduced by an amount estimated to reflect such restrictions. In addition, even where the value
of a security is derived from an independent source, certain assumptions may be required to
determine the securitys fair value. For instance, we assume that the size of positions in
securities that we hold would not be large enough to affect the quoted price of the securities if
we sell them, and that any such sale would happen in an orderly manner. The actual value realized
upon disposition could be different from the currently estimated fair value.
Fair values for derivative contracts represent amounts estimated to be received from or paid
to a third party in settlement of these instruments. These derivatives are valued using quoted
market prices when available or pricing models based on the net present value of estimated future
cash flows. Management deemed the net present value of estimated future cash flows model to be the
best estimate of fair value as most of our derivative products are interest rate products. The
valuation models used require inputs including contractual terms, market prices, yield curves,
credit curves and measures of volatility. The valuation models are monitored over the life of the
derivative product. If there are any changes in the underlying inputs, the model is updated for
those new inputs.
The following table presents the carrying value of our trading securities owned, trading
securities owned and pledged as collateral and trading securities sold, but not yet purchased for
which fair value is measured based on quoted prices or other independent sources versus those for
which fair value is determined by management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading |
|
|
|
Trading |
|
|
Securities Sold, |
|
|
|
Securities Owned |
|
|
But Not Yet |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
or Pledged |
|
|
Purchased |
|
Fair value of securities excluding derivatives, based on quoted prices and independent sources |
|
$ |
753,401 |
|
|
$ |
325,191 |
|
Fair value of securities excluding derivatives, as determined by management |
|
|
8,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of derivatives as determined by management |
|
|
28,438 |
|
|
|
2,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
789,946 |
|
|
$ |
328,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments carried at contract amounts that approximate fair value have short-term
maturities (one year or less), are repriced frequently or bear market interest rates and,
accordingly, are carried at amounts approximating fair value. Financial instruments carried at
contract amount on our consolidated statements of financial condition include receivables from and
payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations, securities purchased under agreements to
resell, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, receivables from and payables to customers,
short-term financing and subordinated debt.
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
We record all assets and liabilities acquired in purchase acquisitions, including goodwill, at
fair value as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business
Combinations. Determining the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired
requires certain management estimates. At June 30, 2006, we had goodwill of $317.2 million,
principally as a result of the 1998 acquisition of our predecessor, Piper Jaffray Companies Inc.,
and its subsidiaries by U.S. Bancorp.
26
Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, we are required to perform impairment tests of our goodwill and intangible assets annually
and more frequently in certain circumstances. We have elected to test for goodwill impairment in
the fourth quarter of each calendar year. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process, which
requires management to make judgments in determining what assumptions to use in the calculation.
The first step of the process consists of estimating the fair value of each operating segment based
on a discounted cash flow model using revenue and profit forecasts and comparing those estimated
fair values with carrying values, which includes the allocated goodwill. If the estimated fair
value is less than the carrying values, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the
impairment by determining an implied fair value of goodwill. The determination of a reporting
units implied fair value of goodwill requires us to allocate the estimated fair value of the
reporting unit to the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit. Any unallocated fair value
represents the implied fair value of goodwill, which is compared to its corresponding carrying
value. We completed our last goodwill impairment test as of October 31, 2005, and no impairment was
identified.
As noted above, the initial recognition of goodwill and other intangible assets and the
subsequent impairment analysis requires management to make subjective judgments concerning
estimates of how the acquired assets or businesses will perform in the future using valuation
methods including discounted cash flow analysis. Events and factors that may significantly affect
the estimates include, among others, competitive forces and changes in revenue growth trends, cost
structures, technology, discount rates and market conditions. Additionally, estimated cash flows
may extend beyond ten years and, by their nature, are difficult to determine over an extended time
period. To assess the reasonableness of cash flow estimates and validate assumptions used in our
estimates, we review historical performance of the underlying assets or similar assets.
In assessing the fair value of our operating segments, the volatile nature of the securities
markets and our industry requires us to consider the business and market cycle and assess the stage
of the cycle in estimating the timing and extent of future cash flows. In addition to estimating
the fair value of an operating segment based on discounted cash flows, we consider other
information to validate the reasonableness of our valuations, including public market comparables,
multiples of recent mergers and acquisitions of similar businesses and third-party assessments.
Valuation multiples may be based on revenues, price-to-earnings and tangible capital ratios of
comparable public companies and business segments. These multiples may be adjusted to consider
competitive differences including size, operating leverage and other factors. We determine the
carrying amount of an operating segment based on the capital required to support the segments
activities, including its tangible and intangible assets. The determination of a segments capital
allocation requires management judgment and considers many factors, including the regulatory
capital requirements and tangible capital ratios of comparable public companies in relevant
industry sectors. In certain circumstances, we may engage a third party to validate independently
our assessment of the fair value of our operating segments. If during any future period it is
determined that an impairment exists, the results of operations in that period could be materially
adversely affected.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
As part of our compensation to employees and directors, we use stock-based compensation,
including stock options and restricted stock. Effective January 1, 2004, we elected to account for
stock-based employee compensation on a prospective basis under the fair value method, as prescribed
by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting and Disclosure of Stock-Based
Compensation, and as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure. The fair value method requires stock
based compensation to be expensed in the consolidated statement of operations at their fair value.
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123(R) (SFAS 123(R)), Share-Based Payment, using the modified prospective
transition method. SFAS 123(R) requires all stock-based compensation to be expensed in the
consolidated statement of operations at fair value, net of estimated forfeitures. Because we have
expensed all equity awards based on the fair value method, net of estimated forfeitures, SFAS
123(R) did not have a material effect on our measurement or recognition methods for stock-based
compensation.
Compensation paid to employees in the form of stock options or restricted stock is generally
amortized on a straight-line basis over the required service period of the award, which is
typically three years, and is included in our results of operations as compensation expense, net of
estimated forfeitures. The majority of our restricted stock grants provide for continued vesting
after termination, providing the employee does not violate non-competition and certain other
post-termination restrictions, as set forth in the award
agreements. We consider the required service period to be the greater of the vesting period or
the non-competition period. We believe that our non-competition restrictions meet the SFAS 123(R)
definition of a substantive service requirement.
27
Stock-based compensation granted to our non-employee directors is in the form of stock
options. Stock-based compensation paid to directors is immediately vested (i.e., there is no
continuing service requirement) and is included in our results of operations as outside services
expense as of the date of grant.
In determining the estimated fair value of stock options, we use the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. This model requires management to exercise judgment with respect to certain
assumptions, including the expected dividend yield, the expected volatility, and the expected life
of the options. The expected dividend yield assumption is based on the assumed dividend payout over
the expected life of the option. The expected volatility assumption is based on industry
comparisons, as we have limited information on which to base our volatility estimates because we
have only been a public company since the beginning of 2004. The expected life of options
assumption is based on the average of the following two factors: 1) industry comparisons; and 2)
the guidance provided by the SEC in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107). SAB 107 allowed
the use of an acceptable methodology under which we can take the midpoint of the vesting date and
the full contractual term. We believe our approach for calculating an expected life to be an
appropriate method in light of the lack of any historical data regarding employee exercise behavior
or employee post-termination behavior. Additional information regarding assumptions used in the
Black-Scholes pricing model can be found in Note 11 to our unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
CONTINGENCIES
We are involved in various pending and potential legal proceedings related to our business,
including litigation, arbitration and regulatory proceedings. Some of these matters involve claims
for substantial amounts, including claims for punitive and other special damages. The number of
these legal proceedings has increased in recent years. We have, after consultation with outside
legal counsel and consideration of facts currently known by management, recorded estimated losses
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, to the extent that claims are probable of loss and the amount of the loss can be
reasonably estimated. The determination of these reserve amounts requires significant judgment on
the part of management. In making these determinations, we consider many factors, including, but
not limited to, the loss and damages sought by the plaintiff or claimant, the basis and validity of
the claim, the likelihood of a successful defense against the claim, and the potential for, and
magnitude of, damages or settlements from such pending and potential litigation and arbitration
proceedings, and fines and penalties or orders from regulatory agencies.
Under the terms of our separation and distribution agreement with U.S. Bancorp and ancillary
agreements entered into in connection with the spin-off, we generally are responsible for all
liabilities relating to our business, including those liabilities relating to our business while it
was operated as a segment of U.S. Bancorp under the supervision of its management and board of
directors and while our employees were employees of U.S. Bancorp servicing our business. Similarly,
U.S. Bancorp generally is responsible for all liabilities relating to the businesses U.S. Bancorp
retained. However, in addition to our established reserves, U.S. Bancorp agreed to indemnify us in
an amount up to $17.5 million for losses that result from certain matters, primarily third-party
claims relating to research analyst independence. U.S. Bancorp has the right to terminate this
indemnification obligation in the event of a change in control of our company. As of June 30, 2006,
approximately $13.3 million of the indemnification remained available.
Under the terms of our asset purchase agreement with UBS Financial Services, Inc., a
subsidiary of UBS AG, (UBS), pursuant to which UBS will acquire our PCS branch network, UBS
agreed to assume certain liabilities of the PCS business, including certain liabilities and
obligations arising from litigation, arbitration, customer complaints and other claims related to
the PCS business, as described in the asset purchase agreement.
Subject to the foregoing, we believe, based on our current knowledge, after appropriate
consultation with outside legal counsel and after taking into account our established reserves and
the U.S. Bancorp indemnity agreement, that pending litigation, arbitration and regulatory
proceedings will be resolved with no material adverse effect on our financial condition. However,
if, during any period, a potential adverse contingency should become probable or resolved for an
amount in excess of the established reserves and indemnification, the results of operations in that
period could be materially adversely affected.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is of critical importance to us given the nature of our business. Insufficient
liquidity resulting from adverse circumstances contributes to, and may be the cause of, financial
institution failure. Accordingly, we regularly monitor our liquidity
position, including our cash and net capital positions, and we have implemented a liquidity
strategy designed to enable our business to continue to operate even under adverse circumstances,
although there can be no assurance that our strategy will be successful under all circumstances.
28
We have a liquid balance sheet. Most of our assets consist of cash and assets readily
convertible into cash. Securities inventories are stated at fair value and are generally readily
marketable. Customers margin loans are collateralized by securities and have floating interest
rates. Other receivables and payables with customers and other brokers and dealers usually settle
within a few days. As part of our liquidity strategy, we emphasize diversification of funding
sources. We utilize a mix of funding sources and, to the extent possible, maximize our lower-cost
financing associated with securities lending and repurchase agreements. Our assets are financed by
our cash flows from operations, equity capital, subordinated debt, bank lines of credit and
proceeds from securities lending and securities sold under agreements to repurchase. The
fluctuations in cash flows from financing activities are directly related to daily operating
activities from our various businesses.
A significant component of our employees compensation is paid in an annual bonus. The timing
of these bonus payments, which generally occurs in February, have a significant impact on our cash
position and liquidity when paid.
We currently do not pay cash dividends on our common stock.
In the third quarter of 2006, we expect to receive after-tax proceeds of approximately $510
million, which excludes the potential additional cash consideration of up to $75 million, for the
sale of our PCS branch network and certain other assets consisting primarily of customer margin
loans to UBS. It is our intention to utilize the sale proceeds in the following manner:
|
|
|
for the expansion of our existing capital markets business and the investment of capital in new businesses; |
|
|
|
|
for the repayment of all $180 million in subordinated debt currently outstanding; and |
|
|
|
|
to repurchase up to $180 million in common stock. |
FUNDING SOURCES
We have available discretionary short-term financing on both a secured and unsecured basis.
Secured financing is obtained through the use of securities lending agreements, repurchase
agreements and secured bank loans. Securities lending agreements are primarily secured by client
collateral pledged for margin loans while bank loans and repurchase agreements are typically
collateralized by the firms securities inventory. Short-term funding is generally obtained at
rates based upon the federal funds rate.
To finance customer receivables we utilized an average of $35 million in short-term bank loans
and an average of $224 million in securities lending arrangements in the second quarter of 2006.
This compares to an average of $69 million in short-term bank loans and $257 million in average
securities lending arrangements in the second quarter of 2005. Average net repurchase agreements
(excluding economic hedges) of $120 million and $163 million in the second quarter of 2006 and the
second quarter of 2005, respectively, were primarily used to finance inventory. Growth in margin
loans to customers is generally financed through increases in securities lending to third parties
while growth in our securities inventory is generally financed through repurchase agreements or
securities lending. Bank financing supplements these sources as necessary. On June 30, 2006, we had
no outstanding short-term bank financing.
As of June 30, 2006, we had uncommitted credit agreements with banks totaling $675 million,
comprising $555 million in discretionary secured lines and $120 million in discretionary unsecured
lines. We have been able to obtain necessary short-term borrowings in the past and believe we will
continue to be able to do so in the future. We have also established arrangements to obtain
financing using as collateral our securities held by our clearing bank or by another broker dealer
at the end of each business day.
In addition to the $675 million of credit agreements described above, our broker dealer
subsidiary is party to a $180 million subordinated loan agreement with an affiliate of U.S.
Bancorp, which has been approved by the NYSE for regulatory net capital purposes as allowable in
our broker dealer subsidiarys net capital computation. The interest on the $180 million
subordinated loan agreement is based on the three-month London Interbank Offer Rate. The entire
amount outstanding matures October 31, 2008. As previously noted, we intend to repay the $180
million in subordinated debt following receipt of the proceeds from the sale of our PCS branch
network to UBS.
29
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
Our contractual obligations have not materially changed from those reported in our Annual
Report to Shareholders on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
As a registered broker dealer and member firm of the NYSE, our broker dealer subsidiary is
subject to the uniform net capital rule of the SEC and the net capital rule of the NYSE. We have
elected to use the alternative method permitted by the uniform net capital rule, which requires
that we maintain minimum net capital of the greater of $1.0 million or 2 percent of aggregate debit
balances arising from customer transactions, as this is defined in the rule. The NYSE may prohibit
a member firm from expanding its business or paying dividends if resulting net capital would be
less than 5 percent of aggregate debit balances. Advances to affiliates, repayment of subordinated
liabilities, dividend payments and other equity withdrawals are subject to certain notification and
other provisions of the uniform net capital rule and the net capital rule of the NYSE. We expect
these provisions will not impact our ability to meet current and future obligations. In addition,
we are subject to certain notification requirements related to withdrawals of excess net capital
from our broker dealer subsidiary. Our broker dealer subsidiary is also registered with the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and therefore is subject to CFTC regulations. Piper
Jaffray Ltd., our registered United Kingdom broker dealer subsidiary, is subject to the capital
requirements of the U.K. Financial Services Authority.
At June 30, 2006, net capital under the SECs Uniform Net Capital Rule was $335.2 million or
63.2 percent of aggregate debit balances, and $324.6 million in excess of the minimum required net
capital.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We enter into various types of off-balance sheet arrangements in the ordinary course of
business. We hold retained interests in nonconsolidated entities, incur obligations to commit
capital to nonconsolidated entities, enter into derivative transactions, enter into non-derivative
guarantees and enter into other off-balance sheet arrangements.
We enter into arrangements with special-purpose entities (SPEs), also known as variable
interest entities. SPEs are corporations, trusts or partnerships that are established for a limited
purpose. SPEs, by their nature, generally are not controlled by their equity owners, as the
establishing documents govern all material decisions. Our primary involvement with SPEs relates to
securitization transactions in which highly rated fixed rate municipal bonds are sold to an SPE. We
follow Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140 (SFAS 140), Accounting for Transfers
and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities a Replacement of FASB
Statement No. 125, to account for securitizations and other transfers of financial assets.
Therefore, we derecognize financial assets transferred in securitizations provided that such
transfer meets all of the SFAS 140 criteria. See Note 5, Securitizations, in the notes to our
unaudited consolidated financial statements for a complete discussion of our securitization
activities.
We have investments in various entities, typically partnerships or limited liability
companies, established for the purpose of investing in emerging growth companies or other private
or public equity. We commit capital or act as the managing partner or member of these entities.
These entities are reviewed under variable interest entity and voting interest entity standards. If
we determine that an entity should not be consolidated, we record these investments on the equity
method of accounting. The lower of cost or market method of accounting is applied to investments
where we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operations of an
entity. For a complete discussion of our activities related to these types of partnerships, see
Note 6, Variable Interest Entities, to our consolidated financial statements included in our
Annual Report to Shareholders on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
We enter into derivative contracts in a principal capacity as a dealer to satisfy the
financial needs of clients. We also use derivative products to manage the interest rate and market
value risks associated with our security positions. For a complete discussion of our activities
related to derivative products, see Note 4, Derivatives, in the notes to our unaudited
consolidated financial statements.
Our other types of off-balance-sheet arrangements include contractual commitments and
guarantees. For a discussion of our activities related to these off-balance sheet arrangements, see
Note 14, Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees, to our
consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report to Shareholders on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
30
Enterprise Risk Management
Risk is an inherent part of our business. In the course of conducting business
operations, we are exposed to a variety of risks. Market risk, credit risk, liquidity risk,
operational risk, and legal, regulatory and compliance risk are the principal risks we face in
operating our business. We seek to identify, assess and monitor each risk in accordance with
defined policies and procedures. The extent to which we properly identify and effectively manage
each of these risks is critical to our financial condition and profitability. For a full
description of our risk management framework, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
VALUE-AT-RISK
Value-at-Risk (VaR) is the potential loss in value of our trading positions due to adverse
market movements over a defined time horizon with a specified confidence level. We perform a daily
historical simulated VaR analysis on substantially all of our trading positions, including fixed
income, equities, convertible bonds and all associated economic hedges. We use a VaR model because
it provides a common metric for assessing market risk across business lines and products. The
modeling of the market risk characteristics of our trading positions involves a number of
assumptions and approximations. While we believe that these assumptions and approximations are
reasonable, different assumptions and approximations could produce materially different VaR
estimates. For example, we include the risk-reducing diversification benefit between various
securities because it is highly unlikely that all securities would have an equally adverse move on
a typical trading day.
We report an empirical VaR based on net realized trading revenue volatility. Empirical VaR
presents an inclusive measure of our historical risk exposure, as it incorporates virtually all
trading activities and types of risk including market, credit, liquidity and operational risk. The
exhibit below presents VaR using the past 250 days of net trading revenue. Consistent with
industry practice, when calculating VaR we use a 95 percent confidence level and a one-day time
horizon for calculating both empirical and simulated VaR. This means there is a 1 in 20 chance that
daily trading net revenues will fall below the expected daily trading net revenues by an amount at
least as large as the reported VaR. As a result, shortfalls from expected trading net revenues on
a single trading day that are greater than the reported VaR would be anticipated to occur, on
average, about once a month.
The following table quantifies the empirical VaR for each component of market risk for the
periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Interest Rate Risk |
|
$ |
319 |
|
|
$ |
324 |
|
Equity Price Risk |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Undiversified Risk |
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
Diversification Benefit |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Diversified Value-at-Risk |
|
$ |
491 |
|
|
$ |
536 |
|
The table below illustrates the daily high, low and average value-at-risk calculated for each
component of market risk during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and the year ended December 31,
2005, respectively.
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Average |
Interest Rate Risk |
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
$ |
310 |
|
|
$ |
333 |
|
Equity Price Risk |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
Aggregate Undiversified Risk |
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
Aggregate Diversified Value-at-Risk |
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Average |
Interest Rate Risk |
|
$ |
1,436 |
|
|
$ |
324 |
|
|
$ |
538 |
|
Equity Price Risk |
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
Aggregate Undiversified Risk |
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
Aggregate Diversified Value-at-Risk |
|
|
1,558 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
31
Model-based VaR derived from simulation has inherent limitations, including reliance on
historical data to predict future market risk and the parameters established in creating the models
that limit quantitative risk information outputs. There can be no assurance that actual losses
occurring on any given day arising from changes in market conditions will not exceed the VaR
amounts shown below or that such losses will not occur more than once in a 20-day trading period.
In addition, different VaR methodologies and distribution assumptions could produce materially
different VaR numbers. Changes in VaR between reporting periods are generally due to changes in
levels of risk exposure, volatilities and/or correlations among asset classes.
The following table quantifies the simulated VaR for each component of market risk for the
periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Interest Rate Risk |
|
$ |
404 |
|
|
$ |
309 |
|
Equity Price Risk |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Undiversified Risk |
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
Diversification Benefit |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Diversified Value-at-Risk |
|
$ |
511 |
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
In addition to daily VaR estimates, we calculate the potential market risk to our trading
positions under selected stress scenarios. We calculate the daily 99.9 percent VaR estimates both
with and without diversification benefits for each risk category and firmwide. These stress tests
allow us to measure the potential effects on net revenue from adverse changes in market
volatilities, correlations and trading liquidity. Supplementary measures employed by Piper Jaffray
to monitor and manage market risk exposure include the following: net market position and basis
point values, option sensitivities, and inventory turnover. All metrics are aggregated by asset
concentration and are used for monitoring limits, exception approvals and strategic control.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information under the caption Enterprise Risk Management in Item 2, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in this Form 10-Q is
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are
effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or
submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. During the second quarter
of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, there was no change in our system of internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Due to the nature of our business, we are involved in a variety of legal proceedings.
These proceedings include litigation, arbitration and regulatory proceedings, which may arise from,
among other things, client account activity, underwriting or other transactional activity,
employment matters, regulatory examinations of our businesses and investigations of securities
industry practices by governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations. The securities
industry is highly regulated, and the regulatory scrutiny applied to securities firms has increased
dramatically in recent years, resulting in a higher number of regulatory investigations and
enforcement actions and significantly greater uncertainty regarding the likely outcome of these
matters. The number of litigation
and arbitration proceedings also has increased in recent years. Accordingly, in recent years
we have incurred, and may incur in the future, higher expenses for legal proceedings than
previously.
32
At the time of our spin-off from U.S. Bancorp, we assumed liability for certain legal
proceedings that named U.S. Bancorp as a defendant but related to the business we managed when
Piper Jaffray was a subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. In those situations, we generally have agreed with
U.S. Bancorp that we will manage the proceedings and indemnify U.S. Bancorp for the related
expenses, including the amount of any judgment. In turn, U.S. Bancorp agreed to indemnify us for
certain legal proceedings relating to our business prior to the spin-off (as described in Note 9 to
our unaudited consolidated financial statements).
Under the terms of our asset purchase agreement with UBS Financial Services Inc., a subsidiary
of UBS AG, pursuant to which UBS will acquire our PCS branch network, UBS agreed to assume certain
liabilities of the PCS business, including certain liabilities and obligations arising from
litigation, arbitration, customer complaints and other claims related to the PCS business, as
described in the asset purchase agreement.
Litigation-related expenses include amounts we reserve and/or pay out as legal and regulatory
settlements, awards or judgments, and fines. Parties who initiate litigation and arbitration
proceedings against us may seek substantial or indeterminate damages, and regulatory investigations
can result in substantial fines being imposed on us. We reserve for contingencies related to legal
proceedings at the time and to the extent we determine the amount to be probable and reasonably
estimable. However, it is inherently difficult to predict accurately the timing and outcome of
legal proceedings, including the amounts of any settlements, judgments or fines. We assess each
proceeding based on its particular facts, our outside advisors and our past experience with
similar matters, and expectations regarding the current legal and regulatory environment and other
external developments that might affect the outcome of a particular proceeding or type of
proceeding. We believe, based on our current knowledge, after appropriate consultation with outside
legal counsel, in light of our established reserves and the indemnification available from U.S.
Bancorp, that pending litigation, arbitration and regulatory proceedings, including those described
below, will be resolved with no material adverse effect on our financial condition. Of course,
there can be no assurance that our assessments will reflect the ultimate outcome of pending
proceedings, and the outcome of any particular matter may be material to our operating results for
any particular period, depending, in part, on the operating results for that period and the amount
of established reserves and indemnification. We generally have denied, or believe that we have
meritorious defenses and will deny, liability in all significant litigation and arbitration
proceedings currently pending against us, and we intend to vigorously defend such actions.
Initial Public Offering Allocation Litigation
We have been named, along with other leading securities firms, as a defendant in many putative
class actions filed in 2001 and 2002 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New
York involving the allocation of securities in certain initial public offerings. The courts order,
dated August 8, 2001, transferred all related class action complaints for coordination and pretrial
purposes as In re Initial Public Offering Allocation Securities Litigation, Master File No. 21 MC
92 (SAS). These complaints assert claims pursuant to Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The
claims are based, in part, upon allegations that between 1998 and 2000, in connection with acting
as an underwriter of certain initial public offerings of technology and Internet-related companies,
we obtained excessive compensation by allocating shares in these initial public offerings to
preferred customers who, in return, purportedly agreed to pay additional compensation to us in the
form of excess commissions that we failed to disclose. The complaints also allege that our
customers who received favorable allocations of shares in initial public offerings agreed to
purchase additional shares of the same issuer in the secondary market at pre-determined prices.
These complaints seek unspecified damages. The defendants motions to dismiss the complaints were
filed on July 1, 2002, and oral argument on the motions to dismiss was heard on November 14, 2002.
The court entered its order largely denying the motions to dismiss on February 19, 2003. A status
conference was held with the court on July 11, 2003, for purposes of establishing a case management
plan setting forth discovery deadlines, selecting focus cases and briefing class certification.
Seventeen focus cases were selected, including eleven cases for purposes of merits discovery and
six cases for purposes of class certification. We are named defendants in two of the merits focus
cases and none of the class certification focus cases. On October 13, 2004, the court issued an
opinion largely granting plaintiffs motions for class certification in the six class certification
focus cases. Defendants filed a petition seeking leave to appeal the class certification ruling on
October 27, 2004. Plaintiffs filed their opposition to the petition on November 8, 2004, and
defendants filed their reply in further support of the petition on November 15, 2004. The United
States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted the defendants petition on June 30, 2005.
Defendants filed their brief on October 3, 2005. Plaintiffs response was filed on December 19,
2005, and defendants filed their reply on January 27, 2006. Oral argument on the class
certification appeal was heard on June 6, 2006. A decision on the appeal is currently pending.
Discovery is proceeding at this time with respect to the remaining eleven focus cases selected for
merits discovery.
33
Initial Public Offering Fee Antitrust Litigation
We have been named, along with other leading securities firms, as a defendant in several
putative class actions filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in
1998. The courts order, dated February 11, 1999, consolidated these purported class actions for
all purposes as In re Public Offering Fee Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 98 CV 7890 (LMM). The
consolidated amended complaint seeks unspecified compensatory damages, treble damages and
injunctive relief. The consolidated amended complaint was filed on behalf of purchasers of shares
issued in certain initial public offerings for U.S. companies and alleges that defendants conspired
in offerings of an amount between $20 million and $80 million to fix the underwriters discount at
7.0 percent of the offering amount in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. The court
dismissed this consolidated action with prejudice and denied plaintiffs motion to amend the
complaint and include an issuer plaintiff. The court stated that its decision did not affect any
class actions filed on behalf of issuer plaintiffs. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed
the district courts decision on December 13, 2002 and remanded the action to the district court. A
motion to dismiss was filed with the district court on March 26, 2003 seeking dismissal of this
action and the issuer plaintiff action described below in their entirety, based upon the argument
that the determination of underwriting fees is implicitly immune from the antitrust laws because of
the extensive federal regulation of the securities markets. Plaintiffs filed their opposition to
the motion to dismiss on April 25, 2003. The underwriter defendants filed a motion for leave to
file a supplemental memorandum of law in further support of their motion to dismiss on June 10,
2003. The court denied the motion to dismiss based upon implied immunity in its memorandum and
order dated June 26, 2003. A supplemental memorandum in support of the motion to dismiss,
applicable only to this action because the purported class consists of indirect purchasers, was
filed on June 24, 2003 and sought dismissal based upon the argument that the proposed class members
cannot state claims upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiffs filed a supplemental memorandum in
opposition to defendants motion to dismiss on July 9, 2003, and defendants filed a reply in
further support of the motion to dismiss on July 25, 2003. The court entered its memorandum and
order granting in part and denying in part the motion to dismiss on February 24, 2004. Plaintiffs
damage claims were dismissed because they were indirect purchasers, but the motion to dismiss was
denied with respect to plaintiffs claims for injunctive relief. We filed our answer to the
consolidated amended complaint on April 22, 2004. Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification
and supporting memorandum of law on September 16, 2004. Class discovery concluded on April 11,
2005, and defendants filed their brief in opposition to plaintiffs motion for class certification
on May 25, 2005. Plaintiffs reply brief in support of their motion for class certification was
filed on October 20, 2005, and defendants filed a surreply brief in opposition to class
certification on November 15, 2005. Plaintiffs filed a summary judgment motion on liability on
October 25, 2005. The Court denied class certification of an issuer class in its Memorandum and
Order dated April 18, 2006. The Order further requires the purchaser plaintiffs to notify the Court
within 14 days as to their intention of pursuing class certification of purchaser class to pursue
injunctive relief without the prospect of recovery of money damages. Plaintiffs filed a Rule 23(f)
application with respect to the denial of class certification on May 1, 2006. The Court granted
their request that the response to Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment be adjourned until 30
days after a ruling on the 23(f) application or the Second Circuit rules on the appeal, whichever
is later.
Similar purported class actions also have been filed against us in the U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of New York on behalf of issuer plaintiffs asserting substantially similar
antitrust claims based upon allegations that 7.0 percent underwriters discounts violate the
Sherman Act. These purported class actions were consolidated by the district court as In re Issuer
Plaintiff Initial Public Offering Fee Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 00 CV 7804 (LMM), on May 23,
2001. These complaints also seek unspecified compensatory damages, treble damages and injunctive
relief. Plaintiffs filed a consolidated class action complaint on July 6, 2001. The district court
denied defendants motion to dismiss the complaint on September 30, 2002. Defendants filed a motion
to certify the order for interlocutory appeal on October 15, 2002. On March 26, 2003, a motion to
dismiss based upon implied immunity was also filed in connection with this action. The court denied
the motion to dismiss on June 26, 2003. Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification and
supporting memorandum of law on September 16, 2004. Class discovery concluded on April 11, 2005.
Defendants filed their brief in opposition to plaintiffs motion for class certification on May 25,
2005, and plaintiffs reply brief in support of their motion for class certification was filed on
October 20, 2005. Defendants filed a surreply brief in opposition to class certification on
November 15, 2005. Plaintiffs filed a summary judgment motion on liability on October 25, 2005.
The Court denied class certification of an issuer class in its Memorandum and Order dated April 18,
2006. The Order further requires the purchaser plaintiffs to notify the Court within 14 days as to
their intention of pursuing class certification of purchaser class to pursue injunctive relief
without the prospect of recovery of money damages. Plaintiffs filed a Rule 23(f) application with
respect to the denial of class certification on May 1, 2006. The Court granted their request that
the response to Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment be adjourned until 30 days after a ruling
on the 23(f) application or the Second Circuit rules on the appeal, whichever is later.
34
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The discussion of our business and operations should be read together with the risk
factors contained in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2005 filed with the SEC, as updated in our subsequent reports on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC.
These risk factors describe various risks and uncertainties to which we are or may become subject.
These risks and uncertainties have the potential to affect our business, financial condition,
results of operations, cash flows, strategies or prospects in a material and adverse manner. The
following information updates the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and
subsequent Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q:
There are risks associated with the sale of the Private Client Services branch network.
On April 11, 2006, we announced the signing of a definitive agreement to sell 100 percent of
our Private Client Services branch network to UBS AG. There are certain risks associated with this
transaction, including the following:
|
|
|
The transaction announced may not be completed, or completed within the
expected timeframe. |
|
|
|
|
We currently expect to realize only a portion, if any, of the up to $75 million
in additional cash consideration provided for in the definitive agreement dependent on
business performance. |
|
|
|
|
Unforeseen difficulties associated with the transaction, including business
disruption and loss of personnel, could delay completion of the transaction and/or cause it
to be more expensive than anticipated and adversely affect our results of operations and
financial condition. |
|
|
|
|
The expected benefits of the transaction, including the growth of our Capital
Markets business, increased profitability and shareholder returns, may take longer than
anticipated to achieve and may not be achieved in their entirety or at all. |
|
|
|
|
Strategies with respect to the redeployment of transaction proceeds may take
longer than anticipated to be realized or may not be achieved in their entirety or at all. |
|
|
|
|
Following consummation of the transaction we may be subject to increased
competitive pressures and experience increased volatility in our financial results. |
The volume of anticipated investment banking transactions may differ from actual results.
The completion of anticipated investment banking transactions is uncertain and beyond our
control, and our investment banking revenue is typically earned upon the successful completion of a
transaction. In most cases we receive little or no payment for investment banking engagements that
do not result in the successful completion of a transaction. For example, a clients acquisition
transaction may be delayed or terminated because of a failure to agree upon final terms with the
counterparty, failure to obtain necessary regulatory consents or board or stockholder approvals,
failure to secure necessary financing, adverse market conditions or unexpected financial or other
problems in the clients or counterpartys business. If the parties fail to complete a transaction
on which we are advising or an offering in which we are participating, we will earn little or no
revenue from the transaction. Accordingly, our business is highly dependent on market conditions
as well as the decisions and actions of our clients and interested third parties, and the number of
engagements we have at any given time is subject to change and may not necessarily result in future
revenues.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
A third-party trustee makes open-market purchases of our common stock from time to
time pursuant to the Piper Jaffray Companies Retirement Plan, under which participating employees
may allocate assets to a company stock fund.
35
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
(a) |
|
The Companys 2006 annual meeting of shareholders was held on May 2, 2006. The holders of
17,146,156 shares of common stock, 82 percent of the outstanding shares entitled to vote as of
the record date, were represented at the meeting in person or by proxy. |
|
(c) |
|
At the annual meeting, B. Kristine Johnson, Jean M. Taylor and Richard A. Zona were elected
as Class III directors to serve three-year terms expiring at the annual meeting of
shareholders in 2009. The following table shows the vote totals for each of these
individuals: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Votes For |
|
Authority Withheld |
B. Kristine Johnson |
|
|
10,024,170 |
|
|
|
7,121,055 |
|
Jean M. Taylor |
|
|
15,632,145 |
|
|
|
1,514,080 |
|
Richard A. Zona |
|
|
15,037,844 |
|
|
|
2,108,381 |
|
At the annual meeting, our shareholders also approved the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and
Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan, ratified the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as
the Companys independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2006, and approved a
shareholder proposal requesting declassification of the Board and annual election of all directors.
The following table indicates the specific voting results for each of these items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal |
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Abstentions |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
Approval of the
Piper Jaffray
Companies Amended
and Restated 2003
Annual and
Long-Term Incentive
Plan |
|
|
10,264,206 |
|
|
|
4,506,786 |
|
|
|
83,970 |
|
|
|
2,291,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratification of the
selection of Ernst
& Young LLP as the
independent auditor
for the year ended
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
17,042,800 |
|
|
|
62,397 |
|
|
|
41,027 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder
proposal requesting
declassification of
the board of
directors and
annual election of
all directors |
|
|
10,731,171 |
|
|
|
3,983,026 |
|
|
|
143,392 |
|
|
|
2,288,635 |
|
36
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Method of |
Number |
|
Description |
|
Filing |
2.1
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated April 10, 2006 among Piper Jaffray Companies, Piper
Jaffray & Co. and UBS Financial Services Inc. (excluding schedules and exhibits,
which the Company agrees to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request).
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan
|
|
Filed herewith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
Filed herewith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
Filed herewith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certifications furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
Filed herewith
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Companys Form 8-K, filed with
the Commission on April 11, 2006. |
37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on
August 4, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIPER JAFFRAY COMPANIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Andrew S. Duff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Its
|
|
Chairman and CEO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Sandra G. Sponem |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Its
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
38
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Method of |
Number |
|
Description |
|
Filing |
2.1
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated April 10, 2006 among Piper Jaffray Companies, Piper
Jaffray & Co. and UBS Financial Services Inc. (excluding schedules and exhibits,
which the Company agrees to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request).
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan
|
|
Filed herewith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
Filed herewith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
Filed herewith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certifications furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
Filed herewith
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Companys Form 8-K, filed with
the Commission on April 11, 2006. |
39