e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 001-8038
KEY ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
04-2648081 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
1301 McKinney Street, Suite 1800, Houston, Texas 77010
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(713) 651-4300
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of April 30, 2009, the number of outstanding shares of common stock of the registrant was
123,587,563.
KEY ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2009
2
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
In addition to statements of historical fact, this report contains forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements that are not
historical in nature or that relate to future events and conditions are, or may be deemed to be,
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on our current
expectations, estimates and projections about Key Energy Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries, our
industry and managements beliefs and assumptions concerning future events and financial trends
affecting our financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, you can identify these
statements by terminology such as may, will, predicts, projects, potential or continue
or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. These statements are only
predictions and are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties. In evaluating those statements,
you should carefully consider the information above as well as the risks outlined in Item 1A. Risk
Factors in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008. Actual performance or results may differ materially and adversely.
We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this report except as required by law. All of our written and oral
forward-looking statements are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements and any other
cautionary statements that may accompany such forward-looking statements.
3
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Key Energy Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
174,174 |
|
|
$ |
92,691 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $12,301
and $11,468, respectively |
|
|
258,674 |
|
|
|
377,353 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
32,535 |
|
|
|
34,756 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
13,806 |
|
|
|
15,513 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
25,603 |
|
|
|
26,623 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
8,076 |
|
|
|
4,848 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
9,246 |
|
|
|
7,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
522,114 |
|
|
|
559,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, gross |
|
|
1,898,966 |
|
|
|
1,858,307 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(842,841 |
) |
|
|
(806,624 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
1,056,125 |
|
|
|
1,051,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
320,954 |
|
|
|
320,992 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
38,928 |
|
|
|
42,345 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
9,999 |
|
|
|
10,489 |
|
Notes and accounts receivable related parties |
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
Equity method investments |
|
|
22,196 |
|
|
|
24,220 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
7,849 |
|
|
|
7,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
1,978,647 |
|
|
$ |
2,016,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
36,731 |
|
|
$ |
46,185 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
168,966 |
|
|
|
197,116 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
12,758 |
|
|
|
4,368 |
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
9,134 |
|
|
|
9,386 |
|
Current portion of notes payable related parties, net of discount |
|
|
14,350 |
|
|
|
14,318 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
2,011 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
243,950 |
|
|
|
273,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations, less current portion |
|
|
12,294 |
|
|
|
13,763 |
|
Notes payable related parties, less current portion |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
613,322 |
|
|
|
613,828 |
|
Workers compensation, vehicular, health and other insurance claims |
|
|
41,216 |
|
|
|
43,151 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
187,623 |
|
|
|
188,581 |
|
Other non-current accrued liabilities |
|
|
17,379 |
|
|
|
17,495 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.10 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized, 123,478,544 and 121,305,289
shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
|
|
12,348 |
|
|
|
12,131 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
602,106 |
|
|
|
601,872 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(51,774 |
) |
|
|
(46,550 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
294,183 |
|
|
|
293,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity attributable to common stockholders |
|
|
856,863 |
|
|
|
860,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
1,978,647 |
|
|
$ |
2,016,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes which are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Key Energy Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
REVENUES |
|
$ |
331,989 |
|
|
$ |
456,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
227,227 |
|
|
|
281,641 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
44,756 |
|
|
|
39,976 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
48,706 |
|
|
|
67,732 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
9,648 |
|
|
|
10,040 |
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets, net |
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
(508 |
) |
Other expense, net |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses, net |
|
|
330,860 |
|
|
|
399,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
56,907 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
(22,457 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
34,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
|
$ |
904 |
|
|
$ |
34,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
120,665 |
|
|
|
127,966 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
121,436 |
|
|
|
129,307 |
|
See the accompanying notes which are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Key Energy Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
904 |
|
|
$ |
34,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
loss, net of tax of $471 and
$0, respectively |
|
|
(5,254 |
) |
|
|
(548 |
) |
Deferred gain (loss) from
available for sale investments,
net of tax of $0 and $0,
respectively |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(5,224 |
) |
|
|
(555 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax |
|
|
(4,320 |
) |
|
|
33,895 |
|
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(4,320 |
) |
|
$ |
33,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes which are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Key Energy Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
904 |
|
|
$ |
34,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
44,756 |
|
|
|
39,976 |
|
Accretion of asset retirement obligations |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
Loss (income) from equity method investments |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Amortization of deferred financing costs and discount |
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
Capitalized interest |
|
|
(1,945 |
) |
|
|
(1,658 |
) |
Loss (gain) on sale of assets, net |
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
Share-based compensation |
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
2,913 |
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
Changes in working capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
115,869 |
|
|
|
(13,040 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
(4,179 |
) |
Accounts payable, accrued interest and accrued expenses |
|
|
(31,471 |
) |
|
|
14,054 |
|
Share-based compensation liability awards |
|
|
(730 |
) |
|
|
(1,225 |
) |
Other assets and liabilities |
|
|
(1,274 |
) |
|
|
(1,207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
129,383 |
|
|
|
70,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(44,797 |
) |
|
|
(30,375 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets |
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
2,088 |
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(993 |
) |
Acquisition of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,086 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(44,000 |
) |
|
|
(30,366 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayments of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(2,635 |
) |
|
|
(3,006 |
) |
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(65,376 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
353 |
|
Proceeds paid for deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(314 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(3,186 |
) |
|
|
(68,235 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash |
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
81,483 |
|
|
|
(28,632 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
92,691 |
|
|
|
58,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
174,174 |
|
|
$ |
29,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes which are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
Key Energy Services, Inc., and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. GENERAL
Key Energy Services, Inc., its wholly-owned subsidiaries and its controlled subsidiaries
(collectively, Key, the Company, we, us, its, and our) provide a complete range of
services to major oil companies, foreign national oil companies and independent oil and natural gas
production companies, including rig-based services, fluid management services, pressure pumping
services, fishing services, rental services, and cased-hole electric wireline services. We operate
in most major oil and natural gas producing regions of the United States as well as internationally
in Argentina and Mexico. We also own a technology development company based in Canada and have
equity interests in oilfield service companies in Canada and the Russian Federation.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared using
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim
financial information and in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC). The condensed December 31, 2008 balance sheet was prepared from
audited financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008. Certain information relating to the Companys organization and footnote
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been
condensed or omitted in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. These unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to current period
financial statement classifications. The Company revised its reportable business segments effective
in the first quarter of 2009 and, in connection with the revision, has restated the corresponding
items of segment information for earlier periods. The new operating segments are Well Servicing and
Production Services. The Company revised its segments to reflect changes in managements resource
allocation and performance assessment in making decisions regarding the Company. Our rig services
and our fluid management services are aggregated within our Well Servicing segment. Our pressure
pumping, fishing, rental and cased-hole electric wireline operations, as well as our Canadian
technology development group, are now aggregated within our Production Services segment. These
changes reflect the Companys current operating focus in compliance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information (SFAS 131). See Note 14. Segment Information for a full description of our segment
realignment.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this report include all
normal and recurring material adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a
fair presentation of the Companys financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the
interim periods presented herein. The results of operations for the three month period ended March
31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year or any other
interim period, due to fluctuations in demand for our services, timing of maintenance and other
expenditures, and other factors.
NOTE 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to develop
estimates and to make assumptions that affect our financial position, results of operations and
cash flows. These estimates also impact the nature and extent of our disclosure, if any, of our
commitments and contingencies. Among other things, we use estimates to (i) analyze assets for
possible impairment, (ii) determine depreciable lives for our assets, (iii) assess future tax
exposure and realization of deferred tax assets, (iv) determine amounts to accrue for
contingencies, (v) value tangible and intangible assets and (vi) assess workers compensation,
vehicular liability, self-insured risk accruals and other insurance reserves. Our actual results
may differ materially from these estimates. We believe that our estimates are reasonable.
We apply Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation (FIN) No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entitiesan Interpretation of ARB No. 51 (Revised 2003)
(FIN 46(R)) when determining whether or not to consolidate a Variable Interest Entity (VIE).
FIN 46(R) requires that an equity investor in a VIE have significant equity at risk (generally a
minimum of 10%) and hold a controlling interest, evidenced by voting rights, and absorb a majority
of the entitys expected losses, receive a majority of the entitys expected returns, or both. If
the equity investor is unable to evidence these characteristics, the entity that retains these
ownership characteristics will be required to consolidate the VIE. We have determined that we do
not have an interest in a VIE and as such we are not the primary beneficiary of a variable interest
in a VIE and we are not the holder of a significant variable interest in a VIE.
8
The Company adopted SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities,
including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS 159), on January 1, 2008. SFAS 159 permits
companies to choose, at specified election dates, to measure eligible items at fair value (the
Fair Value Option). Companies choosing such an election report unrealized gains and losses on
items for which the Fair Value Option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting
period. As of March 31, 2009, we have not elected to measure any of our financial assets or
liabilities using the Fair Value Option. We will assess at each measurement date whether to use the
Fair Value Option on any future financial assets or liabilities as permitted pursuant to the
provisions of SFAS 159.
There have been no material changes or developments in the Companys evaluation of accounting
estimates and underlying assumptions or methodologies that the Company believes to be Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates, as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008.
New Accounting Standards Adopted in this Report
SFAS 141(R). In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), Business
Combinations (SFAS 141(R)). SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how an
acquirer in a business combination recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interests in the
acquiree, as well as the goodwill acquired. Significant changes from previous practice resulting
from SFAS 141(R) include the expansion of the definitions of a business and a business
combination. For all business combinations (whether partial, full or step acquisitions), the
acquirer will record 100% of all assets and liabilities of the acquired business, including
goodwill, generally at their fair values; contingent consideration will be recognized at its fair
value on the acquisition date and, for certain arrangements, changes in fair value will be
recognized in earnings until settlement; and acquisition-related transaction and restructuring
costs will be expensed rather than treated as part of the cost of the acquisition. SFAS 141(R) also
establishes disclosure requirements to enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of
the business combination. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 141(R) on January 1, 2009, but
did not consummate any business combinations during the three months ended March 31, 2009. SFAS
141(R) may have an impact on our consolidated financial statements in the future. The nature and
magnitude of the specific impact will depend upon the nature, terms, and size of any acquisitions
consummated after the effective date.
SFAS 160. In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements An amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 amends
Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to establish accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of
a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary, which is sometimes
referred to as minority interest, is a third-party ownership interest in the consolidated entity
that should be reported as a component of equity in the consolidated financial statements. Among
other requirements, SFAS 160 requires the consolidated statement of income to be reported at
amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest.
SFAS 160 also requires disclosure on the face of the consolidated statement of income of the
amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest.
We adopted the provisions of SFAS 160 on January 1, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not
have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
FSP 157-2. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) SFAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP 157-2), to partially defer SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157). FSP 157-2 deferred the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in
the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), to fiscal years, and interim
periods within those fiscal years, beginning after November 15, 2008. We adopted the provisions of
FSP SFAS 157-2 on January 1, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on
our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
SFAS 161. In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 amends and expands the disclosure
requirements of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and
requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives,
quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments,
and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. We adopted
the provisions of SFAS 161 on January 1, 2009. The Company currently has no financial instruments
that qualify as derivatives, and the adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on
the Companys financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
9
FSP 142-3. In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 142-3, Determination of Useful Life of
Intangible Assets (FSP 142-3). FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in
developing the renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142). FSP 142-3
also requires expanded disclosure regarding the determination of intangible asset useful lives. We
adopted the provisions of FSP 142-3 on January 1, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have
a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted in this Report
FSP 157-4. In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 157-4, Determining the Fair Value of a
Financial Asset When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly
Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP 157-4). FSP 157-4 clarified the
application of SFAS 157 by providing additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance
with SFAS 157, when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have significantly
decreased. FSP 157-4 also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a
transaction is not orderly. FSP 157-4 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted for periods
ending after March 15, 2009. We did not elect early adoption, and we are currently evaluating the
potential impact of the adoption of this standard.
FSP 115-2. In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP 115-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments, which amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance in GAAP
for debt securities to make the guidance more operational and to improve the presentation and
disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial
statements. FSP 115-2 does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to
other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities. FSP 115-2 is effective for interim and
annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods
ending after March 15, 2009. We did not elect early adoption and are currently evaluating the
potential impact of the adoption of this standard.
FSP 107-1. In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 107-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments, which amends SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim
reporting periods of publicly traded companies, as well as in annual financial statements. FSP
107-1 also amends Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting,
to require those disclosures in summarized financial information for interim reporting periods. FSP
107-1 is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption
permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. We did not elect early adoption and are
currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of this standard.
FSP 141(R)-1. In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 141(R)-1, Accounting for Assets Acquired
and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies (FSP 141(R)-1).
FSP 141(R)-1 amends and clarifies SFAS 141(R) to address application issues raised by preparers,
auditors, and members of the legal profession on initial recognition and measurement, subsequent
measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in
a business combination. FSP 141(R)-1 is effective for assets or liabilities arising from
contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning
of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We did not complete
any acquisitions during the first quarter of 2009, but this standard may impact our financial
statements in the future if we complete a business combination.
NOTE 3. ACQUISITIONS
From time to time, the Company acquires businesses or assets that are consistent with its
long-term growth strategy. Results of operations for acquisitions are included in the Companys
financial statements beginning on the date of acquisition. Acquisitions prior to January 1, 2009
are accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and the purchase price is allocated to
the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values at the date
of acquisition. The purchase price allocations related to acquisitions made after March 31, 2008
are based on preliminary information and are subject to change when final fair value determinations
are made for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Acquisitions made after January 1, 2009
are accounted for using the acquisition method pursuant to SFAS 141(R). Final valuations of assets
and liabilities are obtained and recorded as soon as practicable and within one year from the date
of the acquisition. The Company made no acquisitions during the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
10
Western Drilling, LLC
On April 3, 2008, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, purchased all of the
outstanding equity interests of Western Drilling, LLC (Western), a privately-owned company based
in California that operated twenty-two working well service rigs, three stacked well service rigs,
and equipment used in the workover and rig relocation process. The purchase price was
$51.5 million in cash and was paid on April 3, 2008. The purchase price was subject to a working
capital adjustment 45 days from the closing date of the acquisition and resulted in additional
consideration paid of $0.1 million in May 2008. The Company also incurred direct transaction costs
of approximately $0.4 million. The acquisition was funded from borrowings of $50.0 million under
the Companys Senior Secured Credit Facility (see Note 7. Long-Term Debt below) and cash on hand.
Western was incorporated into our Well Servicing segment.
The acquisition of Western was accounted for as a business combination. The total purchase
price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair
values. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired was recorded as
goodwill. During the first quarter of 2009, we adjusted the fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed by approximately $0.2 million, with a corresponding decrease to goodwill. The
purchase price allocation was finalized during the first quarter of 2009.
Hydra-Walk, Inc.
On May 30, 2008, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, purchased all of the
outstanding stock of Hydra-Walk, Inc. (Hydra-Walk) for approximately $10.3 million in cash and a
performance earn-out potential of up to $2.0 million over two years from the acquisition date, if
certain financial and operational performance measures are met. Additionally, during the third
quarter of 2008 the Company paid approximately $0.2 million in additional consideration related to
a holdback amount that was withheld from the seller pending the completion of a seller closing
requirement. The purchase price was also subject to a post-closing working capital adjustment of
less than $0.1 million that was paid during the third quarter of 2008. The Company incurred direct
transaction costs of approximately $0.1 million. The Company retained approximately $1.1 million of
Hydra-Walks net working capital as a result of the transaction and did not assume any of the debt
of Hydra-Walk. Hydra-Walk was incorporated into our Production Services segment.
The acquisition of Hydra-Walk was accounted for as a business combination and the purchase
price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair
values. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired was recorded as
goodwill. The allocation of the purchase price was based upon preliminary valuations and estimates,
and is subject to change as valuations are finalized. The primary area of the purchase price
allocation that is not yet finalized relates to pre-merger contingencies. The final valuation is
expected to be completed no later than the second quarter of 2009. During the quarter ended March
31, 2009, the Hydra-Walk operations met performance earn-out requirements that resulted in the
Company paying additional consideration of $0.3 million, which has been recorded as additional
goodwill.
Leader Energy Services, Ltd.
On July 22, 2008, the Company acquired all of the United States-based assets of Leader Energy
Services, Ltd. (Leader), a Canadian company, for consideration of $34.6 million in cash. The
assets acquired include nine coiled tubing units, seven nitrogen trucks, twelve pumping trucks and
other ancillary equipment. Additionally, the Company paid approximately $0.7 million for supplies
and inventory used in pressure pumping operations. The Company also incurred direct transaction
costs of approximately $0.1 million. The purchase price was allocated to the tangible assets
acquired. The acquisition of the Leader assets was accounted for as an asset purchase as the assets
acquired did not constitute a business and therefore did not result in the establishment of
goodwill. The Company did not identify any acquired intangible assets. The Leader assets were
incorporated into our Production Services segment.
11
NOTE 4. OTHER CURRENT AND NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
The table below presents comparative detailed information about current accrued liabilities at
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current Accrued Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued payroll, taxes and employee benefits |
|
$ |
50,132 |
|
|
$ |
67,408 |
|
Accrued operating expenditures |
|
|
44,352 |
|
|
|
50,833 |
|
Income, sales, use and other taxes |
|
|
38,957 |
|
|
|
41,003 |
|
Self-insurance reserve |
|
|
25,904 |
|
|
|
25,724 |
|
Unsettled legal claims |
|
|
4,565 |
|
|
|
4,550 |
|
Share-based compensation liability |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,796 |
|
|
|
6,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
168,966 |
|
|
$ |
197,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below presents comparative detailed information about other non-current accrued
liabilities at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31. |
|
|
|
March 31. 2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Other Non-Current Accrued Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
$ |
9,484 |
|
|
$ |
9,348 |
|
Environmental liabilities |
|
|
2,987 |
|
|
|
3,004 |
|
Accrued rent |
|
|
2,414 |
|
|
|
2,497 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
1,359 |
|
|
|
1,359 |
|
Share-based compensation liability |
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
Other |
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
17,379 |
|
|
$ |
17,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 5. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2009
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well Servicing |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
317,490 |
|
|
$ |
3,502 |
|
|
$ |
320,992 |
|
Purchase price allocation and other
adjustments, net |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
Impact of foreign currency translation |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(132 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
317,277 |
|
|
$ |
3,677 |
|
|
$ |
320,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
The components of our other intangible assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Noncompete agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying value |
|
$ |
16,207 |
|
|
$ |
16,309 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(5,534 |
) |
|
|
(4,699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying value |
|
$ |
10,673 |
|
|
$ |
11,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents, trademarks, and tradename: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying value |
|
$ |
3,628 |
|
|
$ |
4,391 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(2,511 |
) |
|
|
(3,114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying value |
|
$ |
1,117 |
|
|
$ |
1,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying value |
|
$ |
39,225 |
|
|
$ |
39,225 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(14,387 |
) |
|
|
(12,359 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying value |
|
$ |
24,838 |
|
|
$ |
26,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer backlog: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying value |
|
$ |
609 |
|
|
$ |
622 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying value |
|
$ |
368 |
|
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed technology: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying value |
|
$ |
3,546 |
|
|
$ |
3,598 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(1,614 |
) |
|
|
(1,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying value |
|
$ |
1,932 |
|
|
$ |
2,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain
of our intangible assets are denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars and, as
such, the values of these assets are subject to fluctuations associated with changes in exchange
rates. Additionally, certain of these assets are also subject to purchase accounting adjustments.
The estimated fair values of intangible assets obtained through acquisitions consummated in the
preceding twelve months are based on preliminary information which is subject to change until final
valuations are obtained. Amortization expense for our intangible assets was $3.4 million and
$3.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, respectively.
NOTE 6. EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS
IROC Energy Services Corp.
As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 we owned approximately 8.7 million shares of IROC
Energy Services Corp. (IROC), an Alberta-based oilfield services company. This represented
approximately 19.7% of IROCs outstanding common stock on March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
IROC shares trade on the Toronto Venture Stock Exchange and had a closing price of $0.60 CDN and
$0.54 CDN per share on March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. William M. Austin, our
former Chief Financial Officer, and Newton W. Wilson III, our Chief Operating Officer, serve on
the board of directors of IROC.
Through March 31, 2009, we had significant influence over the operations of IROC through our
ownership interest and representation on IROCs board of directors, but we do not control it. We
account for our investment in IROC using the equity method. Our investment in IROC totaled $3.8
million and $3.7 million as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The pro-rata
share of IROCs earnings and losses to which we are entitled is recorded in our consolidated
statements of operations as a component of other income and expense, with an offsetting increase or
decrease to the carrying value of our investment, as appropriate. Any earnings distributed back to
us from IROC in the form of dividends would result in a decrease in the carrying value of our
equity investment. In addition to our pro-rata share of IROCs net income, the value of our
investment changes based on the exchange rate between the U.S. and Canadian dollar. Changes in the
value of our investment due to fluctuations in exchange rates are offset in accumulated other
comprehensive income.
13
We recorded $0.2 million and less than $0.1 million of equity income related to our investment
in IROC for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. During those time periods, no
earnings were distributed to us by IROC. Only distributed earnings or any gains or losses arising
from the disposal of our investment are reportable for income tax purposes. As a result, the
amounts we record for our pro-rata share of IROCs earnings or losses to which we are entitled
result in a temporary difference between book and taxable income. Under the provisions of SFAS No.
109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109), we record a deferred tax asset or liability, as
appropriate, to account for these temporary differences.
Geostream Services Group
On October 31, 2008, we acquired a 26% interest in OOO Geostream Services Group (Geostream)
for $17.4 million. We incurred direct transaction costs of approximately $1.9 million associated
with the transaction. Geostream is located in the Russian Federation and provides drilling and
workover services and sub-surface engineering and modeling in the Russian Federation. In connection
with our initial investment, three officers of the Company became board members of Geostream,
representing 50% of the board membership. We can exert significant influence over the operations of
Geostream, but do not control it; therefore we account for it using the equity method.
The fair value of the amount we have invested in Geostream is in excess of the underlying book
value of our investment. We are performing a valuation to determine the components of the
difference in basis and have preliminarily allocated substantially all of the difference to
goodwill. We recognized approximately $0.6 million of net loss associated with our investment in
Geostream for the three months ended March 31, 2009. In addition to our pro-rata share of
Geostreams net income, the value of our investment changes based on the exchange rate between the
U.S. dollar and the Euro. Changes in the value of our investment due to fluctuations in exchange
rates are offset in accumulated other comprehensive income.
Under the Geostream agreement, we were originally required to purchase an additional 24% of
Geostream no later than March 31, 2009 for approximately 11.3 million (which at March 31, 2009 was
equivalent to approximately $14.9 million). However, we entered into an amendment to the agreement
on March 24, 2009 that extended this date from March 31, 2009 to June 30, 2009. For a period not to
exceed six years subsequent to October 31, 2008, we have the option to increase our ownership
percentage of Geostream to 100%. However, if we have not acquired 100% of Geostream on or before
the end of the six-year period, we will be required to arrange an initial public offering for those
shares.
Advanced Flow Technologies, Inc.
In September 2007, we completed the acquisition of Advanced Measurements, Inc. (AMI), a
privately-held Canadian company focused on oilfield technology. Prior to the acquisition, AMI owned
a portion of another Canadian company, Advanced Flow Technologies, Inc. (AFTI). As part of the
acquisition, AMI increased its ownership percentage of AFTI to 51.46%
and, as a result, we
consolidated AFTI and recorded a noncontrolling interest in our financial statements.
Our ownership of AFTI declined to 48.73% as of December 31, 2008 due to the issuance of
additional shares by AFTI. We deconsolidated AFTI results from our consolidated financial
statements at December 31, 2008 and now account for that interest under the equity method. In
addition to our pro-rata share of AFTIs net income or loss, the value of our investment changes
based on the exchange rate between the U.S. and Canadian dollar. Changes in the value of our
investment due to fluctuations in exchange rates are offset in accumulated other comprehensive
income.
14
NOTE 7. LONG-TERM DEBT
The components of our long-term debt are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
8.375% Senior Notes due 2014 |
|
$ |
425,000 |
|
|
$ |
425,000 |
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility revolving loans due 2012 |
|
|
187,813 |
|
|
|
187,813 |
|
Other long-term indebtedness |
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
3,015 |
|
Notes payable related parties, net of discount of $150 and $182,
respectively |
|
|
20,350 |
|
|
|
20,318 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
21,428 |
|
|
|
23,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
657,111 |
|
|
$ |
659,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(25,495 |
) |
|
|
(25,704 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of discount |
|
$ |
631,616 |
|
|
$ |
633,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.375% Senior Notes due 2014
On November 29, 2007, the Company issued $425.0 million aggregate principal amount of 8.375%
Senior Notes due 2014 (the Senior Notes), under an Indenture, dated as of November 29, 2007,
among us, the guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee.
The Senior Notes were priced at 100% of their face value to yield 8.375%. Net proceeds, after
deducting initial purchasers fees and offering expenses, were approximately $416.1 million. We
used approximately $394.9 million of the net proceeds to retire then-existing term loans, including
accrued and unpaid interest, with the balance used for general corporate purposes.
The Senior Notes are general unsecured senior obligations of the Company. Accordingly, they
rank effectively subordinate to all of our existing and future secured indebtedness. The Senior
Notes are or will be jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by certain of our
existing and future domestic subsidiaries. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable on June 1 and
December 1 of each year. The Senior Notes mature on December 1, 2014.
Senior Secured Credit Facility
The Company maintains a revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of banks of which Bank of
America Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. are the Administrative Agents (Senior Secured
Credit Facility). The Senior Secured Credit Facility consists of a revolving credit facility,
letter of credit sub-facility and swing line facility of up to an aggregate principal amount of
$400.0 million, all of which will mature no later than November 29, 2012. There were borrowings of
$187.8 million and letters of credit of $53.6 million outstanding under the Senior Secured Credit
Facility at March 31, 2009. The weighted-average interest rate on the outstanding borrowings of the
Senior Secured Credit Facility was 2.03% at March 31, 2009. The Senior Secured Credit Facility
requires the Company to maintain a consolidated interest coverage ratio of at least 3.0 to 1.0,
maintain a consolidated leverage ratio of not more than 3.5 to 1.0, and to not exceed capital
expenditures of $250.0 million in any fiscal year. The Company was in compliance with these
covenants at March 31, 2009.
On September 15, 2008, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (Lehman) filed for bankruptcy
protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Lehman Commercial Paper, Inc.
(LCPI), a subsidiary of Lehman, was part of the syndicate of banks participating in our Senior
Secured Credit Facility. LCPIs commitment was approximately 11% of the Companys total facility.
As of March 31, 2009, the Company had approximately $139.3 million available under its Senior
Secured Credit Facility. This availability does not include approximately $19.3 million of unfunded
commitments by LCPI. Under the terms of the Senior Secured Credit Facility, committed letters of
credit count against the Companys borrowing capacity.
All obligations under the Senior Secured Credit Facility are guaranteed by most of our
subsidiaries and are secured by most of our assets, including our accounts receivable, inventory
and equipment.
Seller Financing Arrangement in Moncla Purchase
In connection with our acquisition of Moncla Well Service, Inc. and related entities
(collectively, Moncla) on October 25, 2007, the Company entered into two promissory notes with
the sellers. The first is an unsecured note in the
15
amount of $12.5 million, which is due and
payable in lump-sum, together with accrued interest, on October 25, 2009. The second unsecured note
in the amount of $10.0 million is payable in annual installments of $2.0 million, plus accrued
interest, on each anniversary date through October 2012. Each of the notes bears interest at the
Federal Funds rate, adjusted annually on the anniversary of the closing date. As of March 31, 2009,
the interest rate on these notes was 1.5%.
NOTE 8. INCOME TAXES
The Companys effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was 19.9%
and 39.5%, respectively. The primary difference between the statutory rate of 35% and our effective
tax rate relates to our projections of our full-year taxable income for 2009 and certain discrete
items related to the release of prior reserves we recorded pursuant to
FIN No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48).
As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had approximately $5.0 million and
$5.6 million, respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits, net of federal tax benefit, which, if
recognized, would impact our effective tax rate. We recognized tax benefits of $0.7 million and
zero due to statute expirations for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008
respectively. We are subject to U.S. Federal Income Tax as well as income taxes in multiple state
and foreign jurisdictions. We have substantially concluded all U.S. federal and state tax matters
through the year ended December 31, 2004.
We record expense and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. We
have accrued a liability of approximately $1.6 million and $2.1 million for the payment of interest
and penalties as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. We believe that it is
reasonably possible that approximately $2.1 million of our currently remaining unrecognized tax
positions, each of which are individually insignificant, may be recognized in the next twelve
months as a result of a lapse of statute of limitations.
No release of our deferred tax asset valuation allowance was made during the quarter ended
March 31, 2009.
NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
Various suits and claims arising in the ordinary course of business are pending against us.
Due in part to the locations where we conduct business in the continental United States, we are
often subject to jury verdicts and arbitration hearings that result in outcomes in favor of the
plaintiffs. We continually assess our contingent liabilities, including potential litigation
liabilities, as well as the adequacy of our accruals and our need for the disclosure of these
items. In accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, we establish a provision for a
contingent liability when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount is
reasonably estimable. As of March 31, 2009, the aggregate amount of our provisions for losses
related to litigation that are deemed probable and reasonably estimable is approximately $4.6
million. We do not believe that the disposition of any of these matters will result in an
additional loss materially in excess of amounts that have been recorded. During the first quarter
of 2009, we recorded a net increase in our reserves of less than $0.1 million related to the
settlement of ongoing legal matters and the continued refinement of liabilities recognized for
litigation deemed probable and estimable.
Gonzales Matter
In September 2005, a class action lawsuit, Gonzales v. Key Energy Services, Inc., was filed in
Ventura County, California, Superior Court, alleging that Key did not pay its hourly employees for
travel time between the yard and the wellhead and that certain employees were denied meal and rest
periods. On September 17, 2008, we reached an agreement in principle, subject to court approval, to
settle all claims related to this matter for $1.2 million. We anticipate receiving final approval
of this settlement in the second quarter of 2009. In 2005, we recorded a liability for this
lawsuit, and do not believe that the ultimate resolution of this matter will have a material impact
on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Litigation with Former Officers and Employees
We were named in a lawsuit by our former general counsel, Jack D. Loftis, Jr., filed in the
U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey on April 21, 2006, in which he alleges a
whistle-blower claim under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, breach of contract, breach of duties of good
faith and fair dealing, breach of fiduciary duty and wrongful termination. On August 17, 2007, the
Company filed counterclaims against Mr. Loftis alleging attorney malpractice, breach of contract
and
16
breach of fiduciary duties. In its counterclaims, the Company seeks repayment of all severance
paid to Mr. Loftis to date (approximately $0.8 million) plus benefits paid during the period
July 8, 2004 to September 21, 2004, and damages relating to the allegations of malpractice and
breach of fiduciary duties. The case was transferred to and is now pending in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and is currently set for trial in the fourth quarter
of 2009. We recorded a liability for this matter in the fourth quarter of 2008 and do not believe
that the conclusion of this matter will have a material impact on our financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.
On October 17, 2006, Jane John, the ex-wife of our former chief executive officer, Francis
John, filed a complaint in Bucks County, Pennsylvania against her ex-husband and the Company.
Ms. John alleges breach of marital agreement, breach of options agreements, civil conspiracy and
fraud. She alleges that Mr. John and the Company defrauded her with regard to Mr. Johns
compensation, as well as in the disclosures of marital property. By virtue of assignments, Ms. John
holds 375,000 stock options which expired unexercised during a period in which the Company was not
current in its financial statements, when such options could not be exercised. In resolving a
separate lawsuit between the Company and Mr. John, Mr. John agreed to indemnify the Company with
respect to damages attributable to any and all of Ms. Johns claims, other than damages
attributable to any alleged breach of Ms. Johns stock option agreements, for which the Company
agreed to indemnify Mr. John. Discovery in the case remains ongoing, and there is currently not a
trial setting. We initially recorded a liability for this matter for the third quarter of 2008, and
do not believe that the ultimate conclusion of this matter will have a material impact on our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
On September 3, 2006, our former controller and former assistant controller filed a joint
complaint against the Company in the 133rd District Court, Harris County, Texas, alleging
constructive termination and breach of contract. Additionally, on January 11, 2008, our former
chief operating officer, James Byerlotzer, filed a lawsuit in the 55th District Court, Harris
County, Texas, alleging breach of contract based on his inability to exercise his stock options
during the period that we were not current in our SEC filings, and based on our failure to provide
him shares of restricted stock. We have not recorded a liability for these matters and do not
believe that the conclusion of these matters will have a material impact on
our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Self-Insurance Reserves
We maintain reserves for workers compensation and vehicle liability on our balance sheet
based on our judgment and estimates using an actuarial method based on claims incurred. We estimate
general liability claims on a case-by-case basis. We maintain insurance policies for workers
compensation, vehicle liability and general liability claims. These insurance policies carry
self-insured retention limits or deductibles on a per occurrence basis. The retention limits or
deductibles are accounted for in our accrual process for all workers compensation, vehicular
liability and general liability claims. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we have
recorded $67.1 million and $68.9 million, respectively, of self-insurance reserves related to
workers compensation, vehicular liabilities and general liability claims. Partially offsetting
these liabilities, we had approximately $10.8 million of insurance receivables as of March 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008 respectively. We feel that the liabilities we have recorded are appropriate
based on the known facts and circumstances and do not expect further losses materially in excess of
the amounts already accrued for existing claims.
Environmental Remediation Liabilities
For environmental reserve matters, including remediation efforts for current locations and
those relating to previously-disposed properties, we record liabilities when our remediation
efforts are probable and the costs to conduct such remediation efforts can be reasonably estimated.
While our litigation reserves reflect the application of our insurance coverage, our environmental
reserves do not reflect managements assessment of the insurance coverage that may apply to the
matters at issue. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we have recorded approximately $3.0
million for our environmental remediation liabilities. We feel that the liabilities we have
recorded are appropriate based on the known facts and circumstances and do not expect further
losses materially in excess of the amounts already accrued.
We provide performance bonds to provide financial surety assurances for the remediation and
maintenance of our saltwater disposal (SWD) properties, in order to comply with environmental
protection standards. Costs for SWD properties may be mandatory (to comply with applicable laws and
regulations), in the future (required to divest or cease operations), or for optimization (to
improve operations, but not for safety or regulatory compliance).
NOTE 10. SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM
On October 26, 2007, the Companys board of directors authorized a share repurchase program,
in which the Company could spend up to $300.0 million to repurchase shares of its common stock on
the open market. During the first
17
three months of 2009, the Company did not repurchase shares on
the open market. Over the course of the program from November 2007 through March 31, 2009, the
Company repurchased an aggregate of approximately 13.4 million shares for a total cost of
approximately $167.3 million. The programs authorization expired on March 31, 2009.
NOTE 11. EARNINGS PER SHARE
We present earnings per share information in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 128,
Earnings Per Share (SFAS 128). Under SFAS 128, basic earnings per common share is determined by
dividing net earnings applicable to common stock by the weighted average number of common shares
actually outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is based on the increased
number of shares that would be outstanding assuming conversion of potentially dilutive outstanding
securities using the treasury stock and as if converted methods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Basic EPS Computation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
904 |
|
|
$ |
34,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
120,665 |
|
|
|
127,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS Computation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
904 |
|
|
$ |
34,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
120,665 |
|
|
|
127,966 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,436 |
|
|
|
129,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
The diluted earnings per share calculation for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
exclude the potential exercise of 4.5 million and 1.9 million stock options, respectively, because
the effects of such exercises on earnings per share in those periods would be anti-dilutive. The
diluted earnings per share calculation for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 exclude the potential
exercise of 0.6 million stock appreciation rights (SARs) because the effects of such exercise on
earnings per share in this period would be anti-dilutive. These options and SARs would be
anti-dilutive because the exercise prices for those awards exceeded the average stock price for the
Company during the respective periods. None of our SARs were anti-dilutive for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008.
NOTE 12. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company recognized employee share-based compensation expense of $0.3 million and $3.7
million during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The related income tax
benefit recognized for employee share-based compensation was $0.1 million and $1.0 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company did not capitalize any
share-based compensation during the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
18
During March 2009, we issued a total of approximately 2.3 million shares of restricted common
stock to certain of our employees and officers, which vest in equal installments over the next
three to four years depending on the terms of the award. These shares had a weighted-average
issuance price of $2.76 per share. The unrecognized compensation cost related to the Companys
unvested stock options, restricted shares and phantom shares as of March 31, 2009 was $0.1 million,
$10.2 million and $0.7 million, respectively and is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 2.2 years, 1.8 years and 1.4 years, respectively.
NOTE 13. TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES
Transactions with Employees
In connection with our acquisition of Western, the former owner of Western became an employee
of the Company. At the time of and subsequent to the acquisition, the employee also owns an
exploration and production company, Holmes Western Oil Corporation (HWOC), which was a customer
of Western. Subsequent to the acquisition, the Company continued to provide services to HWOC. The
prices charged for these services are at rates that are an average of the prices charged to our
other customers in the California market. As of March 31, 2009, our receivables with HWOC totaled
approximately $0.3 million and for the three months ended March 31, 2009, revenues from HWOC
totaled approximately $1.8 million.
Board of Director Relationship with Customer
In October 2007, we added a member to the Companys Board of Directors who is the Senior Vice
President, General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
(Anadarko), which is one of our customers. Sales to Anadarko comprised less than 2% of our total
revenues for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Transactions with Anadarko
for our services are made at market prices.
NOTE 14. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company revised its reportable business segments effective in the first quarter of 2009.
The new operating segments are Well Servicing and Production Services. Financial results as of and
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 have been restated to reflect the change in operating
segments. The company revised its segments to reflect changes in managements resource allocation
and performance assessment in making decisions regarding the Company. Our rig services and fluid
management operations are aggregated within our Well Servicing segment. Our pressure pumping,
fishing, rental and cased-hole electric wireline operations, as well as our technology development
group in Canada, are now aggregated within our Production Services segment. These changes reflect
the Companys current operating focus in compliance with SFAS 131. We aggregate services that
create our reportable segments in accordance with SFAS 131, and the accounting policies for our
segments are the same as those described in Note 1. Organization and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008 and filed with the SEC on February 27, 2009. We evaluate the performance of our operating
segments based on revenue and Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization
(EBITDA), which is a non-GAAP measure and is not disclosed below. All inter-segment sales pricing
is based on current market conditions. The following is a description of the segments:
Well Servicing
Rig Services
This segment includes the maintenance of existing wells, workover of existing wells,
completion of newly drilled wells, drilling of horizontal wells, recompletion of existing wells
(re-entering a well to complete the well in a new geologic zone or formation) and plugging and
abandonment of wells at the end of their useful lives.
Workover services are performed to enhance the production of existing wells. Such services
include extensions of existing wells to drain new formations either by deepening wellbores to new
zones or by drilling horizontal or lateral wellbores to improve reservoir drainage. In less
extensive workovers, our rigs are used to seal off depleted zones in existing wellbores or to
access a previously bypassed productive zone.
Our completion services prepare a newly drilled oil or natural gas well for production. We
typically provide a well service rig and may also provide other equipment such as a workover
package to assist in the completion process.
19
Fluid Management Services
This segment also provides fluid management services, including oilfield transportation and
produced-water disposal services. Our oilfield transportation and produced-water disposal services
include vacuum truck services, fluid transportation services and disposal services for operators
whose oil or natural gas wells produce saltwater and other fluids. In addition, we are a supplier
of frac tanks which are used for temporary storage of fluids in conjunction with the fluid hauling
operations. Our fluid management services will collect, transport and dispose of the saltwater.
These fluids are removed from the well site and transported for disposal in a SWD well.
Production Services
This segment provides multiple services as described below:
Pressure Pumping Services
We provide well stimulation and cementing services to oil and natural gas producers. Well
stimulation services include fracturing, nitrogen, coiled tubing and acidizing services. These
services (which may be completion or workover services) are provided to oil and natural gas
producers and are used to enhance the production of oil and natural gas wells from formations which
exhibit restricted flow of oil and natural gas. In the fracturing process, we typically pump fluid
and sized sand, or proppants, into a well at high pressure in order to fracture the formation and
thereby increase the flow of oil and natural gas. With our cementing services, we pump cement into
a well between the casing and the wellbore.
Fishing Services
We provide fishing services to major and independent oil and natural gas production companies
in the Gulf Coast,
Central and Permian Basin marketplaces, as well as in California. We also provided limited
services offshore in the Gulf of Mexico. Fishing services involve recovering lost or stuck
equipment in the wellbore utilizing a fishing tool.
Rental Services
We provide rental services to major and independent oil and natural gas production companies
in the Gulf Coast, Central and Permian Basin marketplaces, as well as in California. We offer a
full line of services and rental equipment designed for use both onshore and offshore for drilling
and workover services. Our rental tool inventory consists of drill pipe, tubulars, handling tools
(including our patented Hydra-Walk® pipe-handling units and services), pressure-control
equipment, power swivels and foam air units.
Cased-hole Electric Wireline Services
We perform activities at various times throughout the life of the well including perforating,
completion logging, production logging and casing integrity services. After the wellbore is cased
and cemented, we can provide a number of services. Perforating creates the flow path between the
reservoir and the wellbore. Production logging can be performed throughout the life of the well to
measure temperature, fluid type, flow rate, pressure and other reservoir characteristics. This
service helps the operator analyze and monitor well performance and determine when a well may need
a workover or further stimulation.
Functional Support
We have aggregated all of our operating segments that do not meet the aggregation criteria
established in SFAS 131 to form a Functional Support segment. Functional Support expenses include
expenses associated with managing all of our reportable operating segments. Functional Support
assets consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable and
investments in subsidiaries, our equity method investments in IROC and Geostream, and deferred
income tax assets.
20
The following tables set forth our segment information as of and for the three month periods
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
As of and for the three months ended March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
Functional |
|
Reconciling |
|
|
|
|
Well Servicing |
|
Services |
|
Support |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
256,261 |
|
|
$ |
75,728 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
331,989 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,488 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
215,246 |
|
|
|
79,288 |
|
|
|
26,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320,689 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
41,015 |
|
|
|
(3,560 |
) |
|
|
(26,155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,300 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(556 |
) |
|
|
(618 |
) |
|
|
10,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,648 |
|
Income (loss) before taxes |
|
|
41,414 |
|
|
|
(3,851 |
) |
|
|
(36,434 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,579,905 |
|
|
|
368,854 |
|
|
|
2,125,948 |
|
|
|
(2,096,060 |
) |
|
|
1,978,647 |
|
Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions |
|
|
24,200 |
|
|
|
17,789 |
|
|
|
2,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,797 |
|
As of and for the three months ended March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
Functional |
|
Reconciling |
|
|
|
|
Well Servicing |
|
Services |
|
Support |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
338,513 |
|
|
$ |
117,886 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
456,399 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(540 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
253,058 |
|
|
|
92,973 |
|
|
|
43,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
389,349 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
85,455 |
|
|
|
24,913 |
|
|
|
(43,318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,050 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(590 |
) |
|
|
(505 |
) |
|
|
11,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,040 |
|
Income (loss) before taxes |
|
|
85,142 |
|
|
|
25,537 |
|
|
|
(53,772 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,496,476 |
|
|
|
404,080 |
|
|
|
515,533 |
|
|
|
(589,283 |
) |
|
|
1,826,806 |
|
Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions |
|
|
25,513 |
|
|
|
3,687 |
|
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,375 |
|
The following tables present information related to our operations on a geographical basis as
of and for the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
Argentina |
|
Mexico |
|
Canada |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
As of and for the three months
ended March 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
$ |
284,743 |
|
|
$ |
19,336 |
|
|
$ |
27,696 |
|
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
331,989 |
|
Long-lived assets |
|
|
2,243,792 |
|
|
|
24,434 |
|
|
|
56,568 |
|
|
|
7,184 |
|
|
|
(875,445 |
) |
|
|
1,456,533 |
|
Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions |
|
|
31,028 |
|
|
|
1,566 |
|
|
|
12,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the three months
ended March 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
$ |
420,494 |
|
|
$ |
26,866 |
|
|
$ |
5,701 |
|
|
$ |
3,338 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
456,399 |
|
Long-lived assets |
|
|
1,460,705 |
|
|
|
28,880 |
|
|
|
18,449 |
|
|
|
10,773 |
|
|
|
(152,791 |
) |
|
|
1,366,016 |
|
Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions |
|
|
23,528 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
6,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,375 |
|
21
NOTE 15. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
During the fourth quarter of 2007, we issued the Senior Notes, which are guaranteed by
virtually all of our domestic subsidiaries, all of which are wholly-owned. These guarantees are
joint and several, full, complete and unconditional. There are no restrictions on the ability of
subsidiary guarantors to transfer funds to the parent company.
As a result of these guarantee arrangements, we are required to present the following
condensed consolidating financial information pursuant to SEC Regulation S-X Rule 3-10, Financial
Statements of Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities Registered or Being Registered.
22
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
32,920 |
|
|
$ |
395,641 |
|
|
$ |
93,951 |
|
|
$ |
(398 |
) |
|
$ |
522,114 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,029,894 |
|
|
|
26,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,056,125 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
316,764 |
|
|
|
4,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320,954 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
9,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,999 |
|
Intercompany notes and accounts receivable
and investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
1,926,575 |
|
|
|
433,098 |
|
|
|
1,382 |
|
|
|
(2,361,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
20,956 |
|
|
|
44,924 |
|
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
1,990,450 |
|
|
$ |
2,220,321 |
|
|
$ |
129,329 |
|
|
$ |
(2,361,453 |
) |
|
$ |
1,978,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
21,207 |
|
|
$ |
194,733 |
|
|
$ |
27,770 |
|
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
243,950 |
|
Capital lease obligations, less current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,261 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,294 |
|
Notes payable related parties, less current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
612,812 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
613,322 |
|
Intercompany notes and accounts payable |
|
|
309,997 |
|
|
|
1,628,577 |
|
|
|
74,860 |
|
|
|
(2,013,434 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
188,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,623 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
56,986 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,595 |
|
Stockholders and members equity |
|
|
856,863 |
|
|
|
321,254 |
|
|
|
27,005 |
|
|
|
(348,259 |
) |
|
|
856,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
1,990,450 |
|
|
$ |
2,220,321 |
|
|
$ |
129,329 |
|
|
$ |
(2,361,453 |
) |
|
$ |
1,978,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
29,673 |
|
|
$ |
440,758 |
|
|
$ |
88,534 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
559,122 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,025,007 |
|
|
|
26,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,051,683 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
316,669 |
|
|
|
4,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320,992 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
10,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,489 |
|
Intercompany notes and accounts receivable
and investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
1,917,522 |
|
|
|
419,554 |
|
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
(2,338,851 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
22,597 |
|
|
|
48,237 |
|
|
|
3,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
1,980,281 |
|
|
$ |
2,250,225 |
|
|
$ |
125,111 |
|
|
$ |
(2,338,694 |
) |
|
$ |
2,016,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
13,792 |
|
|
$ |
231,528 |
|
|
$ |
28,054 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
273,373 |
|
Capital lease obligations, less current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,714 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,763 |
|
Notes payable related parties, less current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
612,813 |
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
613,828 |
|
Intercompany notes and accounts payable |
|
|
305,348 |
|
|
|
1,624,932 |
|
|
|
69,204 |
|
|
|
(1,999,484 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
187,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,581 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,386 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,646 |
|
Stockholders and members equity |
|
|
860,732 |
|
|
|
312,650 |
|
|
|
26,559 |
|
|
|
(339,209 |
) |
|
|
860,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
1,980,281 |
|
|
$ |
2,250,225 |
|
|
$ |
125,111 |
|
|
$ |
(2,338,694 |
) |
|
$ |
2,016,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
294,273 |
|
|
$ |
48,203 |
|
|
$ |
(10,487 |
) |
|
$ |
331,989 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
201,641 |
|
|
|
32,983 |
|
|
|
(7,397 |
) |
|
|
227,227 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,256 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,756 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
44,226 |
|
|
|
4,267 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
48,706 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
11,132 |
|
|
|
(1,556 |
) |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,648 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
(395 |
) |
|
|
3,011 |
|
|
|
(2,460 |
) |
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses, net |
|
|
11,684 |
|
|
|
287,172 |
|
|
|
41,833 |
|
|
|
(9,829 |
) |
|
|
330,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(11,684 |
) |
|
|
7,101 |
|
|
|
6,370 |
|
|
|
(658 |
) |
|
|
1,129 |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (LOSS) INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON
STOCKHOLDERS |
|
$ |
(10,209 |
) |
|
$ |
7,101 |
|
|
$ |
4,670 |
|
|
$ |
(658 |
) |
|
$ |
904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
422,621 |
|
|
$ |
36,457 |
|
|
$ |
(2,679 |
) |
|
$ |
456,399 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
257,771 |
|
|
|
25,666 |
|
|
|
(1,796 |
) |
|
|
281,641 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,051 |
|
|
|
1,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,976 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
62,874 |
|
|
|
4,782 |
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
67,732 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
10,756 |
|
|
|
(1,007 |
) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
10,040 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(664 |
) |
|
|
1,497 |
|
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses, net |
|
|
10,976 |
|
|
|
357,025 |
|
|
|
33,913 |
|
|
|
(2,422 |
) |
|
|
399,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(10,976 |
) |
|
|
65,596 |
|
|
|
2,544 |
|
|
|
(257 |
) |
|
|
56,907 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(20,484 |
) |
|
|
(561 |
) |
|
|
(1,412 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,457 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (LOSS) INCOME |
|
|
(31,460 |
) |
|
|
65,035 |
|
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
(257 |
) |
|
|
34,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (LOSS) INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON
STOCKHOLDERS |
|
$ |
(31,460 |
) |
|
$ |
65,035 |
|
|
$ |
1,166 |
|
|
$ |
(257 |
) |
|
$ |
34,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating
activities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
132,499 |
|
|
$ |
(3,116 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
129,383 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,231 |
) |
|
|
(1,566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,797 |
) |
Intercompany notes and accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,679 |
) |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
7,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other investing activities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,113 |
) |
|
|
(1,173 |
) |
|
|
7,286 |
|
|
|
(44,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on long-term debt |
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(513 |
) |
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
Intercompany notes and accounts |
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
7,128 |
|
|
|
(7,286 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other financing activities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,635 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,635 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,028 |
) |
|
|
7,128 |
|
|
|
(7,286 |
) |
|
|
(3,186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,358 |
|
|
|
2,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,848 |
|
|
|
16,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
155,206 |
|
|
$ |
18,968 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
174,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Parent |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating
activities |
|
$ |
(108 |
) |
|
$ |
67,550 |
|
|
$ |
2,869 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
70,311 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,375 |
) |
Intercompany notes and accounts |
|
|
(1,644 |
) |
|
|
(66,981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other investing activities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing
activities |
|
|
(1,644 |
) |
|
|
(97,347 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,625 |
|
|
|
(30,366 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(65,376 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65,376 |
) |
Intercompany notes and accounts |
|
|
67,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
(68,625 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other financing activities, net |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
(2,967 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,859 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities |
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
(2,967 |
) |
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
(68,625 |
) |
|
|
(68,235 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,764 |
) |
|
|
4,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,632 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning
of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,358 |
|
|
|
12,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,594 |
|
|
$ |
16,277 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
29,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Key Energy Services, Inc., its wholly-owned subsidiaries and its controlled subsidiaries
(collectively, Key, the Company, we, us, its, and our) provide a complete range of
services to major oil companies, foreign national oil companies and independent oil and natural gas
production companies, including rig-based services, fluid management services, pressure pumping
services, fishing services, rental services, and cased-hole electric wireline services. We operate
in most major oil and natural gas producing regions of the United States as well as internationally
in Argentina and Mexico. We also own a technology development company based in Canada and have
equity interests in oilfield service companies in Canada and the Russian Federation.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes as of March 31, 2009 and
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, included elsewhere herein, and the audited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we operated in two business segments, Well Servicing
and Production Services. We also have a Functional Support segment associated with managing all
of our reportable operating segments. A description of our Well Servicing and Production Services
business segments is outlined below:
Well Servicing
Rig Services
This segment includes the maintenance of existing wells, workover of existing wells,
completion of newly drilled wells, drilling of horizontal wells, recompletion of existing wells
(re-entering a well to complete the well in a new geologic zone or formation) and plugging and
abandonment of wells at the end of their useful lives.
Workover services are performed to enhance the production of existing wells. Such services
include extensions of existing wells to drain new formations either by deepening wellbores to new
zones or by drilling horizontal or lateral wellbores to improve reservoir drainage. In less
extensive workovers, our rigs are used to seal off depleted zones in existing wellbores and access
previously bypassed productive zones.
Our completion services prepare a newly drilled oil or natural gas well for production. We
typically provide a well service rig and may also provide other equipment such as a workover
package to assist in the completion process.
Fluid Management Services
This segment also provides fluid management services, including oilfield transportation and
produced-water disposal services. Our oilfield transportation and produced-water disposal services
include vacuum truck services, fluid transportation services and disposal services for operators
whose oil or natural gas wells produce saltwater and other fluids. In addition, we are a supplier
of frac tanks which are used for temporary storage of fluids in conjunction with the fluid hauling
operations. Our fluid management services will collect, transport and dispose of the saltwater.
These fluids are removed from the well site and transported for disposal in a saltwater disposal
(SWD) well.
Production Services
This segment provides multiple services as described below:
Pressure Pumping Services
We provide well stimulation and cementing services to oil and natural gas producers. Well
stimulation services include fracturing, nitrogen, coiled tubing and acidizing services. These
services (which may be completion or workover services) are provided to oil and natural gas
producers and are used to enhance the production of oil and natural gas wells from formations which
exhibit restricted flow of oil and natural gas. In the fracturing process, we typically pump fluid
and sized sand, or proppants, into a well at high pressure in order to fracture the formation and
thereby increase the flow of oil and natural gas. With our cementing services, we pump cement into
a well between the casing and the wellbore.
27
Fishing Services
We provide fishing services to major and independent oil and natural gas production companies
in the Gulf Coast, Central and Permian Basin marketplaces, as well as in California. We also
provided limited services offshore in the Gulf of Mexico. Fishing services involve recovering lost
or stuck equipment in the wellbore utilizing a fishing tool.
Rental Services
We provide rental services to major and independent oil and natural gas production companies
in the Gulf Coast, Central and Permian Basin marketplaces, as well as in California. We offer a
full line of services and rental equipment designed for use both onshore and offshore for drilling
and workover services. Our rental tool inventory consists of drill pipe, tubulars, handling tools
(including our patented
Hydra-Walk® pipe-handling units and services), pressure-control
equipment, power swivels and foam air units.
Cased-hole Electric Wireline Services
We perform activities at various times throughout the life of the well including perforating,
completion logging, production logging and casing integrity services. After the wellbore is cased
and cemented, we can provide a number of services. Perforating creates the flow path between the
reservoir and the wellbore. Production logging can be performed throughout the life of the well to
measure temperature, fluid type, flow rate, pressure and other reservoir characteristics. This
service helps the operator analyze and monitor well performance and determine when a well may need
a workover or further stimulation.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
In determining the overall health of the oilfield service industry, we believe the Baker
Hughes U.S. land drilling rig count is the best barometer of capital spending and activity levels,
since this data is made publicly available on a weekly basis. Historically, our activity levels
have correlated well with capital spending by oil and natural gas producers. When commodity prices
are strong, capital spending by our customers tends to be high, as illustrated by the Baker Hughes
U.S. land drilling rig count. As the following table indicates, the land drilling rig count has
fallen dramatically since the fourth quarter of 2008 and prices for both oil and natural gas have
also declined.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Baker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYMEX Henry |
|
Hughes U.S. |
|
|
WTI Cushing Oil |
|
Hub Natural Gas |
|
Land Drilling |
|
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
Rigs (2) |
2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
43.18 |
|
|
$ |
4.56 |
|
|
|
1,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
97.94 |
|
|
$ |
8.74 |
|
|
|
1,712 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ |
123.95 |
|
|
$ |
11.47 |
|
|
|
1,797 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ |
118.05 |
|
|
$ |
8.99 |
|
|
|
1,910 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
59.06 |
|
|
$ |
6.42 |
|
|
|
1,836 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the average price for the periods presented. Source: EIA / Bloomberg
|
|
(2) |
|
Source: www.bakerhughes.com |
Internally, we measure activity levels in our Well Servicing segment primarily through our rig
and trucking hours. As capital spending by our customer base increases, demand for our services
generally rises, resulting in increased rig and trucking services and more hours worked.
Conversely, when activity levels decline due to lower spending by our customer base, we generally
provide fewer services, which results in lower hours worked. The number of rig and trucking hours,
as
well as pricing, may also be affected by increases in industry capacity. We publicly release
our monthly rig and trucking
28
hours. The following table presents our quarterly rig and trucking
hours from the first quarter of 2008 through the first quarter of 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rig Hours |
|
Trucking Hours |
2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
489,819 |
|
|
|
499,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
659,462 |
|
|
|
585,040 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
701,286 |
|
|
|
603,632 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
721,285 |
|
|
|
620,885 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
634,772 |
|
|
|
607,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total 2008 |
|
|
2,716,805 |
|
|
|
2,416,561 |
|
MARKET CONDITIONS AND OUTLOOK
Market Conditions Quarter Ended March 31, 2009
Market conditions during the first quarter of 2009 continued the downward trend that began in
the latter part of 2008. Overall demand for our services has continued to decline in response to
the rapid decline in commodity prices for oil and natural gas since the third quarter of 2008,
which has caused many of our customers projects to become economically unviable. The global
financial crisis, which has reduced the availability of credit financing to many of our customers,
has also affected demand. Our activity levels during the first quarter of 2009 declined
significantly relative to prior periods, even when taking into account the expansion of our
operations over the prior twelve months. As industry-wide activity levels have fallen, pricing
pressures have increased, resulting in lower pricing for our services over the same time period.
The average Baker Hughes U.S. land drilling rig count for the first quarter of 2009 was 1,287, a
decline of 29.9% from December 31, 2008 and a decline of 24.8% since the end of the first quarter
of 2008. The activity decline portrayed by the Baker Hughes U.S. land drilling rig count over the
past three months represents the steepest decline in a three month period since that data began to
be captured and reported. Commodity prices have seen a similar decline; spot prices for West Texas
Intermediate at Cushing, Oklahoma have declined approximately 51.1% since the end of the first
quarter of 2008, and natural gas at the Henry Hub has declined approximately 63.5% over the same
period. All of our operating units have seen reductions in activity and pricing pressure as the
remaining service providers attempt to retain their market share; those that have been hardest hit
are those that are more closely tied to natural gas drilling activity, including our pressure
pumping, fishing, rental and cased-hole electric wireline operations.
In anticipation of the slowdown in activity, we implemented several cost reduction strategies
during the late third and early fourth quarters of 2008, and those efforts continued and expanded
during the first quarter of 2009. These strategies included pay rate and benefits reductions for
our personnel, aggressive management of our supply chain in an effort to reduce our operating
costs, and certain targeted workforce reductions. All of these efforts have helped to preserve some
of our operating margins, but the decline in activity and pricing levels has been so rapid that our
margins have suffered.
In early 2009 we reorganized our internal operating structure around six major lines of
business Rig Services, Fluid Management Services, Pressure Pumping Services, Fishing Services,
Rental Services, and Electric Wireline Services and organized our operations in the continental
United States around six major geographical regions. We believe that this shift in organizational
makeup will help us become more competitive in all of the markets in which we operate and allow us
to better capture synergies associated with our size and implement more rapid and consistent
decision making. We also believe that our new organizational structure will position us well, when
the business cycle turns, to more effectively capture the incremental margins resulting from an
increase in activity.
Market Outlook for the Remainder of 2009
We believe that the remainder of 2009 will continue to be difficult for our industry. Because
commodity prices continue to be depressed and our customers access to credit remains restricted,
we believe it is probable that activity levels and pricing will not see much improvement for the
remainder of 2009. In certain markets and lines of business, we have
29
begun to see the rates of
decline in activity and pricing decrease, but we are not yet able to predict where or when the
bottom of the market will occur. This is supported by the April 30, 2009 U.S. land rig count, which
stood at 889, which is approximately 30.9% lower than the March 31, 2009 rig count. At current
commodity price levels, many of our customers are still reluctant to spend funds, given the
uncertainty over the near- and mid-term outlook for prices as a result of economic conditions, and
we cannot be certain that the recent volatility in commodity prices has abated.
For the remainder of 2009, we expect that our lines of business will continue to see low
levels of activity and pricing relative to prior years. If commodity prices begin to stabilize, we
anticipate that our Well Servicing businesses will be the first to level out, as our customers will
first spend to maintain or increase their existing production. Less uncertainty over near- and
mid-term oil and natural gas pricing, coupled with price reductions for our services, should
encourage our customers to pursue maintenance activity on existing production. If commodity prices
begin to recover, we feel that our Well Servicing segment will be the first to see the benefits in
activity as our customers require workovers and other maintenance to bring wells that had
previously been shut in back into production.
Internationally, we are experiencing significant labor-related issues related to our
operations in Argentina, primarily related to not being able to terminate the employment of field
and office personnel due to the significant pressure and influence of employees and labor
organizations. During the first quarter of 2009, we took appropriate legal actions to seek relief
from the Argentine government to enable us to downsize our workforce and, in the near future, we
may choose to terminate a significant portion of our Argentine employee base. We are also
considering other alternatives for administrative relief with respect to our business and
operations in Argentina. The ultimate outcome of our actions is impossible to determine at this
time, but we are prepared to downsize our local operations or exit the region entirely. For the
year ended December 31, 2008, our operations in Argentina represented less than 6% of our
consolidated revenues.
Because of our size, geographical diversity, and new organizational structure, we believe that
we are well equipped to weather the downturn until commodity prices recover, leading our customers
to spend more capital for production enhancement or maintenance needs and thereby increasing
broader demand for our services. Until that time, management will continue to aggressively monitor
and manage the Companys cost structure, and we will continue to focus on maintaining a strong
balance sheet with acceptable leverage ratios and good liquidity. Management will also continue to
explore opportunities for expanding our service footprint into new markets or new lines of business
as those opportunities present themselves in the current market.
30
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Consolidated Results of Operations
The following table shows our consolidated results of operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
REVENUES |
|
$ |
331,989 |
|
|
$ |
456,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
227,227 |
|
|
|
281,641 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
44,756 |
|
|
|
39,976 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
48,706 |
|
|
|
67,732 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
9,648 |
|
|
|
10,040 |
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets, net |
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
(508 |
) |
Other expense, net |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses, net |
|
|
330,860 |
|
|
|
399,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
56,907 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
(22,457 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
34,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
|
$ |
904 |
|
|
$ |
34,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
120,665 |
|
|
|
127,966 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
121,436 |
|
|
|
129,307 |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, our net income was $0.9 million, compared to net
income of $34.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Our earnings per diluted share
for the period was $0.01 per share compared to $0.27 per share for the same period in 2008. The
decrease in net income and earnings per share was primarily attributable to a decline in revenues
associated with the severe downturn in market conditions, partially offset by decreases in our
expenses, an increase in earnings from our operations in Mexico, and contributions from the
acquisitions we made during the last twelve months.
A detailed review of our operations, including a review of our segments, for the first quarter
of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, is provided below.
Revenues
Our consolidated revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2009 decreased $124.4 million,
or 27.3%, to $332.0 million from $456.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The
decrease in revenue is primarily attributable to the severe downturn in market conditions beginning
in the late fourth quarter of 2008 and continuing through the first quarter of 2009. As a result of
the changes in the marketplace, we experienced a significant decline in our activity and pricing
for our services. Partially offsetting these declines was revenue attributable to acquisitions made
during the previous twelve months and the expansion of our operations in Mexico.
Direct Operating Expenses
Our consolidated direct operating expenses decreased $54.4 million, or 19.3%, to
$227.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $281.6 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2008. These costs were 68.4% of revenue during the first quarter of 2009,
compared to 61.7% during the same period in 2008. The decline in direct operating expenses during
the first quarter of 2009 was attributable to lower direct employee compensation, lower repairs and
maintenance expenses, lower fuel costs and a decline in our costs for frac sand. These costs
declined due to our lower activity levels associated with the lower demand for our services in the
first quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, lower fuel prices, and cost control
measures we put in place beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 in response to the downturn in
demand for our services. Partially offsetting these declines were higher direct operating expenses
during the first quarter of 2009 associated with the acquisitions we made in the last twelve
months.
31
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense increased approximately $4.8 million, or 12.0%, to $44.8
million during the first quarter of 2009 compared to $40.0 million for the first quarter of 2008.
The increase in our depreciation and amortization expense is primarily attributable to acquisitions
we have completed in the last twelve months, the expansion of our operations in Mexico, and charges
for assets that we took out of service during the first quarter of 2009 in response to the downturn
in market conditions.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses decreased approximately $19.0 million, or 28.1%, to
$48.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to $67.7 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2008. General and administrative expense was 14.7% of revenue for the first
quarter of 2009, compared to 14.8% of revenue for the same period in 2008. Our general and
administrative expenses declined as a result of lower professional fees due to the continuing
resolution of items arising from our previously delayed financial reporting process and
improvements in our internal control environment and as a result of lower employee compensation
attributable to headcount, wage rate and benefits reductions that we put in place in late 2008 and
early 2009 in anticipation of and in response to the downturn in activity levels. Equity-based
compensation was also lower in the first quarter of 2009 as a result of our having accelerated the
vesting period on the majority of our stock option awards that were out of the money during the
fourth quarter of 2008. As a result, no expense was recognized on these awards during the first
quarter of 2009.
Interest Expense, net of amounts capitalized
Interest expense decreased approximately $0.4 million, or 3.9%, for the three months ended
March 31, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008. The decline in interest expense is primarily
attributable to lower interest rates on our variable-rate debt instruments, partially offset by
higher overall debt levels.
Loss (gain) on sale of assets, net
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recognized a net loss on asset sales of
approximately $0.7 million, compared to a net gain of approximately $0.3 million during the first
quarter of 2008. From time to time and in the normal course of business, we sell assets that are
either in scrap condition or are no longer being used, and recognize gains or losses, as
appropriate, based on the difference between the proceeds received from the sale and the carrying
value of the asset prior to disposition.
Interest Income
Interest income decreased approximately $0.3 million to $0.2 million for the first quarter of
2009 compared to $0.5 million for the first quarter of 2008. The decrease in interest income is
primarily attributable to declines in interest rates during the latter part of 2008, partially
offset by our increased cash and cash equivalents.
Other Expense, net
Other expense, net decreased approximately $0.8 million to less than $0.1 million during the
first quarter of 2009 compared to $0.9 million in the first quarter of 2008. Other expense, net is
primarily attributable to our pro-rata share of the income or loss from our equity-method
investments in IROC, AFTI and Geostream and foreign currency transaction gains and losses from our
international operations.
Income Tax Expense
Our income tax expense decreased $22.2 million to $0.2 million for the first quarter of 2009
from $22.5 million for the first quarter of 2008. The decrease in income tax expense during the
first quarter of 2009 is primarily attributable to decreased taxable income for the period.
Additionally, our effective tax rate was 19.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared
to 39.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2008, and decreased during the first quarter of 2009
as a result of our projections of our full-year taxable income for 2009 and certain discrete items
related to the release of prior reserves we recorded pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48).
32
Segment Operating Results
The following table shows operating results for each of our segments, net of intersegment
eliminations, for the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively (in
thousands, except for percentages):
For the three months ended March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
Functional |
|
|
Well Servicing |
|
Services |
|
Support |
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
256,261 |
|
|
$ |
75,728 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating expenses, net of intersegment eliminations |
|
|
215,246 |
|
|
|
79,288 |
|
|
|
26,155 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
41,015 |
|
|
|
(3,560 |
) |
|
|
(26,155 |
) |
Operating income (loss) as a percentage of revenue |
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
-4.7 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
Functional |
|
|
Well Servicing |
|
Services |
|
Support |
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
338,513 |
|
|
$ |
117,886 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating expenses, net of intersegment eliminations |
|
|
253,058 |
|
|
|
92,973 |
|
|
|
43,318 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
85,455 |
|
|
|
24,913 |
|
|
|
(43,318 |
) |
Operating income (loss) as a percentage of revenue |
|
|
25.2 |
% |
|
|
21.1 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
Well Servicing
Revenues from external customers for our Well Servicing segment decreased $82.3 million, or
24.3%, to $256.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to $338.5 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2008. The primary reason for the decline in revenues for this
segment was the overall downturn in the market for our services, resulting in lower activity levels
and pricing during the first quarter of 2009. Partially offsetting these declines were revenues
attributable to acquisitions we completed during the previous twelve months and the expansion of
our operations in Mexico. Rig hours for the first quarter of 2009 totaled 489,819, a decrease of
approximately 25.7% from 659,462 hours during the first quarter of 2008. Trucking hours for the
first quarter of 2009 totaled 499,247, a decline of approximately 14.7% from 585,040 hours during
the first quarter of 2008.
Operating expenses, net of intersegment eliminations, for our Well Servicing segment were
$215.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009, which represented a decrease of $37.8
million, or 14.9%, compared to $253.1 million for the same period in 2008. Operating income for the
Well Servicing segment was 16.0% of revenue for the first quarter of 2009 and 25.2% of revenue for
the same period in 2008. The decline in operating expenses during the first quarter of 2009 was
attributable to lower employee compensation, lower repairs and maintenance expenses, and lower fuel
costs. These costs declined due to our lower activity levels associated with the lower demand for
our services in the first quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, lower fuel prices,
and cost control measures we put in place beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 in response to
the downturn in demand for our services. Partially offsetting these declines were higher expenses
during the first quarter of 2009 associated with the acquisitions we made in the last twelve months
and the expansion of our operations in Mexico, as well as higher depreciation expense associated
with our acquisitions and larger fixed asset base.
Production Services
Revenues from external customers for our Production Services segment, which includes our
pressure pumping, fishing, rental, and electric wireline lines of business and our technology
development group based in Canada, decreased $42.2 million, or 35.8%, to $75.7 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $117.9 million for the same period in 2008. The
overall decline in revenue for this segment is primarily attributable to lower asset utilization
resulting from the decline in land drilling activity in the continental United States, and the
resulting pressure on pricing as service providers attempt to maintain market share. Partially
offsetting the decline in revenues are incremental revenues associated with the acquisitions we
have made during the last twelve months.
33
Operating expenses, net of intersegment eliminations, for our Production Services segment
decreased $13.7 million, or 14.7%, to $79.3 million for the first quarter of 2009 compared to
$93.0 million for the first quarter of 2008. Operating income declined due to our lower activity
levels associated with the lower demand for our services in the first quarter of 2009 compared to
the same period in 2008. Partially offsetting the lower operating income were declines in operating
expenses associated with reductions in activity, lower fuel prices, lower expenses for frac sand,
and cost control measures we put in place beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 in response to
the downturn in demand for our services. Partially offsetting these declines were higher operating
expenses during the first quarter of 2009 associated with the acquisitions we have made in the last
twelve months and higher depreciation expense associated with our larger fixed asset base.
Functional Support
Operating expenses for Functional Support, which represent expenses associated with managing
our other reportable operating segments, declined approximately $17.2 million, or 39.6%, to $26.2
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $43.3 million for the same period in
2008. The primary reason for the decline in Functional Support costs is lower general and
administrative employee compensation associated with headcount, wage rate and benefits reductions
we put into place during the fourth quarter of 2008 and continuing into the first quarter of 2009
in anticipation of and in response to the downturn in demand for our services. Also contributing to
the decrease were lower professional fees (approximately $7.5 million) associated with the
continuing resolution of items arising from our previously delayed financial reporting process and
improvements in our internal controls environment, and lower equity-based compensation expenses.
During the fourth quarter of 2008 we accelerated the vesting period on the majority of our out of
the money stock option awards. As a result, no expense was recognized on those awards during the
first quarter of 2009, leading to a decline in equity-based compensation costs of approximately
$3.4 million.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Current Financial Condition and Liquidity
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the three month periods ended March 31, 2009
and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March |
|
|
|
31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
129,383 |
|
|
$ |
70,311 |
|
Cash paid for capital expenditures |
|
|
(44,797 |
) |
|
|
(30,375 |
) |
Other investing activities, net |
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Repayments of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(2,635 |
) |
|
|
(3,006 |
) |
Repayments on long-term debt |
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(65,376 |
) |
Other financing activities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
147 |
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash |
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
81,483 |
|
|
$ |
(28,632 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from operating activities increased approximately $59.1 million, which was primarily
the result of increased collections of accounts receivable, partially offset by lower net income
and higher cash paid against our accounts payable balances.
Cash flow used in investing activities increased approximately $13.6 million during the first
quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The increase in cash used in investing
activities was primarily the result of higher capital expenditures during the first quarter of 2009
compared to the same period in 2008.
Cash flow used in financing activities decreased approximately $65.0 million during the first
quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, primarily because the Company did not make any
purchases of its common stock under its share repurchase program during the first quarter of 2009.
34
As of March 31, 2009, we had net working capital (excluding the current portion of long-term
debt, notes payable to related parties, and capital lease obligations of $25.5 million) of
$303.7 million. Net working capital at December 31, 2008 (excluding the current portion of
long-term debt, notes payable to related parties, and capital lease obligations of $25.7 million)
was $311.5 million. Our working capital at March 31, 2009 decreased from December 31, 2008
primarily as a result of increased accrued interest expense and lower accounts receivable,
partially offset by the increase in our cash and cash equivalents.
As of April 30, 2009, we had $185.2 million of cash and cash equivalents. Of this amount, our
accounts were guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), including under the
FDICs Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, up to $3.8 million. In addition, $39.8 million of our
cash held in money market accounts as of April 30,
2009 was guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury Departments Temporary Guarantee Program for Money
Market Funds. The Companys cash deposits in excess of these amounts were not insured or
guaranteed.
We believe that despite the current market downturn, our current and near-term financial
condition is strong. As of March 31, 2009, we had $174.2 million in cash and cash equivalents, and
net working capital excluding the current portion of long-term debt, notes payable to related
parties and capital lease obligations of $303.7 million. As of March 31, 2009, $187.8 million of
borrowings were outstanding under our revolving credit facility and $53.6 million of letters of
credit issued under the letter of credit sub-facility, which also reduce the total borrowing
capacity under the Senior Secured Credit Facility were also outstanding. As of March 31, 2009, we
had $139.3 million of availability under our Senior Secured Credit Facility. Our borrowing level at
March 31, 2009 represents the highest amount of outstanding borrowings incurred by us during 2009.
35
At March 31, 2009, our annual debt maturities for our Senior Notes, borrowings under our
Senior Secured Credit Facility, notes payable to related parties and other indebtedness were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Payments |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
16,500 |
|
2010 |
|
|
3,015 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
189,813 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal payments |
|
|
636,328 |
|
At March 31, 2009, the Company is in compliance with all the covenants required under our
Senior Notes and the Senior Secured Credit Facility. See Sources of Liquidity and Capital
Resources and Liquidity Outlook and Future Capital Requirements below for further discussion of
the Senior Notes and the Senior Secured Credit Facility.
Sources of Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Companys sources of liquidity include our current cash and cash equivalents, availability
under our Senior Secured Credit Facility (defined below), and internally generated cash flows from
operations. During the fourth quarter of 2007, we refinanced our indebtedness and issued the Senior
Notes (defined below), using the proceeds from that issuance to retire our then-existing senior
credit facility. We also entered into our current Senior Secured Credit Facility during the fourth
quarter of 2007. See Note 7. Long-Term Debt under Item 1. Financial Statements above for
further detail.
8.375% Senior Notes
On November 29, 2007, we issued 8.375% senior notes (the Senior Notes). The Senior Notes
were priced at 100% of their face value to yield 8.375%. Net proceeds, after deducting initial
purchasers fees and offering expenses, were approximately $416.1 million. We used approximately
$394.9 million of the net proceeds to retire our term loans, including accrued and unpaid interest,
under our then-existing senior credit facility.
The Senior Notes are general unsecured senior obligations of the Company. Accordingly, they
rank effectively subordinate to all of our existing and future secured indebtedness. The Senior
Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by certain of our existing
and future domestic subsidiaries. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable on June 1 and December 1
of each year. The Senior Notes mature on December 1, 2014.
On or after December 1, 2011, the Senior Notes will be subject to redemption at any time and
from time to time at our option, in whole or in part, upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days
notice, at the redemption prices (expressed as percentages of the principal amount redeemed) set
forth below, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the applicable redemption date, if
redeemed during the twelve-month period beginning on December 1 of the years indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Percentage |
|
2011 |
|
|
104.19 |
% |
2012 |
|
|
102.09 |
% |
2013 |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time and from time to time before December 1, 2010, we
may, on any one or more occasions, redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the
outstanding Senior Notes at a redemption price of 108.375% of the principal amount thereof, plus
accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date, with the net cash proceeds of any one
or more equity offerings; provided that at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of the
Senior Notes issued under the indenture remains outstanding immediately after each such redemption;
and provided, further, that each such redemption shall occur within 180 days of the date of the
closing of such equity offering.
In addition, at any time and from time to time prior to December 1, 2011, we may, at our
option, redeem all or a portion of the Senior Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the
principal amount thereof plus the applicable premium (as defined in the Indenture) with respect to
the Senior Notes and plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date. If we
experience a change of control, subject to certain exceptions, we must give holders of the Senior
Notes the opportunity to sell to us their Senior Notes, in whole or in part, at a purchase price
equal to 101% of the aggregate principal
amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the date of purchase.
36
We are subject to certain negative covenants under the indenture governing the Senior Notes.
The indenture limits our ability to, among other things:
|
|
|
sell assets; |
|
|
|
|
pay dividends or make other distributions on capital stock or subordinated indebtedness; |
|
|
|
|
make investments; |
|
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock; |
|
|
|
|
create certain liens; |
|
|
|
|
enter into agreements that restrict dividends or other payments from our subsidiaries to us; |
|
|
|
|
consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of our assets; |
|
|
|
|
engage in transactions with affiliates; and |
|
|
|
|
create unrestricted subsidiaries. |
These covenants are subject to certain exceptions and qualifications, and contain
cross-default provisions in connection with the covenants of our Senior Secured Credit Facility. In
addition, substantially all of the covenants will terminate before the Senior Notes mature if one
of two specified ratings agencies assigns the Senior Notes an investment grade rating in the future
and no events of default exist under the Indenture. Any covenants that cease to apply to us as a
result of achieving an investment grade rating will not be restored, even if the credit rating
assigned to the Senior Notes later falls below an investment grade rating.
In accordance with a registration rights agreement, the Company filed an exchange offer
registration statement with the SEC, which became effective on August 22, 2008, and offered to
exchange an aggregate principal amount of $425.0 million of registered 8.375% Senior Notes due
2014, which the Company refers to as the exchange notes, for any and all of our original
unregistered 8.375% Senior Notes due 2014 that were issued in a private offering on November 29,
2007. The terms of the exchange notes were substantially identical to those terms of the original
notes, except that transfer restrictions, registration rights and additional interest provisions
relating to the originally issued notes did not apply to the exchange notes. References to the
Senior Notes herein includes exchange notes issued in the exchange offer.
Senior Secured Credit Facility
Simultaneously with the closing of the offering of the Senior Notes, the Company entered into
a new credit agreement with several lenders that provides for a senior secured credit facility (the
Senior Secured Credit Facility) consisting of a revolving credit facility, letter of credit
sub-facility and swing line facility of up to an aggregate principal amount of $400.0 million, all
of which will mature no later than November 29, 2012. All obligations under the Senior Secured
Credit Facility are guaranteed by most of our subsidiaries and are secured by most of our assets,
including our accounts receivable, inventory and equipment. The Senior Secured Credit Facility and
the obligations thereunder are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and are or
will be guaranteed by certain of the Companys existing and future domestic subsidiaries. The
Senior Secured Credit Facility replaced the Companys previous senior credit facility, which was
terminated in connection with the closing of the offering of the Senior Notes.
The interest rate per annum applicable to amounts borrowed under the Senior Secured Credit
Facility are, at the Companys option, (i) LIBOR plus the applicable margin or (ii) the higher of
(x) Bank of Americas prime rate and (y) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.5%, plus the applicable
margin. The applicable margin for LIBOR loans ranges from 150 to 200 basis points, and the
applicable margin for all other loans ranges from 50 to 100 basis points, both of which depend upon
the Companys consolidated leverage ratio. The one-month LIBOR rate at March 31, 2009 was 0.5% and
our borrowing rate was 150 basis points over LIBOR.
The Senior Secured Credit Facility contains certain financial covenants, which, among other
things, require the maintenance of a consolidated leverage ratio not to exceed 3.50 to 1.00 and a
consolidated interest coverage ratio of not less than 3.00 to 1.00, and limit the Companys capital
expenditures to $250.0 million per fiscal year, up to 50% of which amount
37
may be carried over for expenditure in the following fiscal year. Each of the ratios referred
to above will be calculated quarterly on a consolidated basis for each trailing four fiscal quarter
period. In addition, the Senior Secured Credit Facility contains certain affirmative and negative
covenants, including, without limitation, restrictions on (i) liens; (ii) debt, guarantees and
other contingent obligations; (iii) mergers and consolidations; (iv) sales, transfers and other
dispositions of property or assets; (v) loans, acquisitions, joint ventures and other investments
(with acquisitions permitted so long as, after giving pro forma effect thereto, no default or event
of default exists under the Senior Secured Credit Facility, the consolidated leverage ratio does
not exceed 2.75 to 1.00, the Company is in compliance with the consolidated interest coverage ratio
and the Company has at least $25 million of availability under the Senior Secured Credit Facility);
(vi) dividends and other distributions to, and redemptions and repurchases from, equity holders;
(vii) prepaying, redeeming or repurchasing subordinated (contractually or structurally) debt;
(viii) granting negative pledges other than to the lenders; (ix) changes in the nature of the
Companys business; (x) amending organizational documents, or amending or otherwise modifying any
debt, any related document or any other material agreement if such amendment or modification would
have a material adverse effect; and (xi) changes in accounting policies or reporting practices; in
each of the foregoing cases, with certain exceptions. The Senior Secured Credit Facility also
contains cross-default provisions in connection with the covenants of the Senior Notes. Further,
the Senior Secured Credit Facility permits share repurchases up to $200.0 million and provides that
share repurchases in excess of $200.0 million can be made only if our debt to capitalization ratio
is below 50%.
The Company may prepay the Senior Secured Credit Facility in whole or in part at any time
without premium or penalty, subject to certain reimbursements to the lenders for breakage and
redeployment costs.
On September 15, 2008, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (Lehman) filed for bankruptcy
protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. A subsidiary of Lehman, Lehman
Commercial Paper, Inc. (LCPI), was a member of the syndicate of banks participating in our Senior
Secured Credit Facility. LCPIs commitment was approximately 11% of the Companys total facility.
As of March 31, 2009, the Company had approximately $139.3 million available under its Senior
Secured Credit Facility. This availability does not include approximately $19.3 million of unfunded
commitments by LCPI. The Company also had $53.6 million in committed letters of credit under the
Senior Secured Credit Facility. Under the terms of the Senior Secured Credit Facility, committed
letters of credit count against the Companys borrowing capacity.
Moncla Notes Payable
In connection with the acquisition of Moncla Well Service, Inc. and related entities
(collectively, Moncla), we entered into two notes payable with its former owners (each, a Moncla
Note and, collectively, the Moncla Notes). The first Moncla Note is an unsecured note in the
amount of $12.5 million, which is due and payable in a lump-sum, together with accrued interest, on
October 25, 2009. The second Moncla Note is an unsecured note in the amount of $10.0 million and
is payable in annual installments of $2.0 million, plus accrued interest, beginning October 25,
2008 through 2012. Each of the Moncla Notes bears interest at the Federal Funds rate adjusted
annually on the anniversary of the closing date of the Moncla acquisition.
Capital Lease Agreements
We lease equipment, such as vehicles, tractors, trailers, frac tanks and forklifts, from
financial institutions under master lease agreements. As of March 31, 2009, there was approximately
$21.4 million outstanding under such equipment leases.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At March 31, 2009 we did not, and we currently do not, have any off-balance sheet arrangements
that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial
condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital
resources.
Liquidity Outlook and Future Capital Requirements
We believe that our internally generated cash flow from operations and current reserves of
cash and cash equivalents are sufficient to finance the majority of our cash requirements for
current and future operations, budgeted capital expenditures and debt service for the remainder of
2009. As we have historically done, the Company may, from time to time, access available funds
under its Senior Secured Credit Facility to supplement its liquidity to meet its cash requirements
for day to day operations and times of peak needs throughout the year. Our planned capital
expenditures, as well as any acquisitions we choose to pursue, could be financed through a
combination of cash on hand, cash flow from operations, borrowings under our Senior Secured Credit
Facility and, in the case of acquisitions, equity.
38
As of April 30, 2009, we had $53.6 million of letters of credit issued under the letter of
credit sub-facility and approximately $657.1 million of total debt, notes payable and capital
leases. As of April 30, 2009, we had cash on hand of $185.2 million and available borrowing
capacity of $139.3 million under our Senior Secured Credit Facility. As of April 30, 2009,
approximately $18.0 million of our cash and cash equivalents was held in the bank accounts of our
foreign subsidiaries, with $3.8 million of that amount being held in U.S. bank accounts and
denominated in U.S. dollars. We believe that these balances could be repatriated for general
corporate use without material withholdings.
Our Senior Secured Credit Facility and Senior Notes contain numerous covenants that govern our
ability to make domestic and international investments and to repurchase our stock. Even if we
experience a more severe downturn in our business, we believe that the covenants related to our
capital spending and our investments in our foreign subsidiaries are within our control. Therefore,
we believe we can avoid a default of these covenants.
Our Senior Secured Credit Facility also requires us to maintain certain financial performance
levels. The financial covenants are as follows:
|
|
|
Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio As calculated pursuant to the terms of the Senior
Secured Credit Facility, we are required to maintain a ratio of trailing four quarters
earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) to interest expense
of at least 3.0 to 1.0. At March 31, 2009, the calculated consolidated interest coverage
ratio was 10.59 to 1.0. |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Leverage Ratio As calculated pursuant to the terms of the Senior Secured
Credit Facility, we are required to maintain a ratio of total debt to trailing four quarters
EBITDA of no greater than 3.5 to 1.0. At March 31, 2009, the calculated consolidated
leverage ratio was 1.52 to 1.0. With total qualifying debt of $657.1 million at March 31,
2009, this covenant requires that our trailing four quarters EBITDA meet a minimum threshold
of $187.7 million. Prior to the first quarter of 2009, we included outstanding letters of
credit (currently $53.6 million) with funded debt when calculating this ratio. We recently
determined that outstanding letters of credit are not defined as funded indebtedness under
our Senior Secured Credit Facility, and therefore they have been excluded from this
calculation. |
Management believes that the Company will remain in compliance with these covenants, ratios
and tests through at least the end of 2009. Should the trailing four quarter EBITDA fall below the
required threshold in the future, management may also utilize cash on hand to reduce debt
outstanding to maintain compliance with this covenant. A breach of any of these covenants, ratios
or tests could result in a default under our indebtedness. See Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the SEC on February 27, 2009.
Although continued deterioration of market conditions could lead to a downgrade in the credit
ratings of companies in our industry, a downgrade of Keys credit rating would not have an effect
on our outstanding debt under either the Senior Secured Credit Facility or the Senior Notes, but
would potentially impact our ability to obtain additional external financing, if it was required.
Capital Expenditures
During 2009, management plans to continue to invest in our business through capital
expenditures, albeit at levels lower than in prior years. Our capital expenditure program for 2009
is expected to total approximately $100 million. As of March 31, 2009, we had approved remaining
projects totaling approximately $22.4 million. However, our capital expenditure program is subject
to market conditions, including activity levels, commodity prices and industry capacity. Our focus
for the remainder of 2009 will be maximizing the utilization of our current equipment; however, we
may seek to increase our 2009 capital expenditure budget in the event international expansion
opportunities develop. We currently plan to fund these expenditures through a combination of cash
on hand, operating cash flows and borrowings under our Senior Secured Credit Facility. Should our
operating cash flows prove to be insufficient to fund these expenditures, management expects it
will adjust capital spending plans accordingly.
Debt Service
In the fourth quarter of 2009, we are required to make principal payments totaling
$14.5 million, plus accrued interest, related to the Moncla Notes. These payments represent a lump
sum payment of one Moncla Note totaling $12.5 million and a $2.0 million annual installment payment
on the second Moncla Note. We expect to fund our obligations under the Moncla Notes through cash on
hand generated by operating activities or borrowings under our Senior Secured Credit Facility.
39
Additionally, interest on our Senior Notes is due on June 1 and December 1 of each year.
Interest on the Senior Notes will be approximately $35.6 million for 2009. We expect to fund
interest payments from cash generated by operations.
Geostream Investment
On October 31, 2008, we acquired a 26% interest in Geostream for $17.4 million. Geostream is
based in the Russian Federation and provides drilling and workover services and sub-surface
engineering and modeling in the Russian Federation. Under the Geostream agreement, we were
originally required to purchase an additional 24% of Geostream no later than March 31, 2009 for
approximately 11.3 million (which at March 31, 2009 was equivalent to $14.9 million). However, we
entered into an amendment to the agreement on March 24, 2009 that extended this date from March 31,
2009 to June 30, 2009. For a period not to exceed six years subsequent to October 31, 2008, we have
the option to increase our ownership percentage of Geostream to 100%. However, if we have not
acquired 100% of Geostream on or before the end of the six-year period, we will be required to
arrange an initial public offering for those shares. We expect to satisfy our obligation to
Geostream through cash on hand generated by our operations or borrowings under our Senior Secured
Credit Facility.
While management continues to anticipate that 2009 will continue to be a period of lower
demand and prices for our services, we believe that our operating cash flow, cash on hand and
available borrowings, coupled with our ability to control our capital expenditures, will be
sufficient to maintain adequate liquidity throughout the remainder of 2009.
Share Repurchase Plan
In October 2007, our board of directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to
$300.0 million. From the inception of the program in November 2007 through March 31, 2009, we
repurchased approximately 13.4 million shares of our common stock through open market transactions
for an aggregate cost of approximately $167.3 million. We did not make any share repurchases under
the program during the first quarter of 2009. The share repurchase program expired per its terms on
March 31, 2009 and was not extended.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There have been no material changes in our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about
market risk from those disclosed in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. More detailed information
concerning market risk can be found in Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about
Market Risk in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K dated as of, and filed with the SEC on,
February 27, 2009.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, management
performed, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer,
an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).
Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure
controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designated to ensure
that information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Based on this evaluation, management concluded that due to the identification of a material
weakness in our payroll process as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and discussed below, as of March 31, 2009, the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures remained ineffective.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In February 2009, we filed our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008
in which we described ineffective control activities surrounding our payroll process that
constituted a material weakness in our system of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008. Specifically, these control activities pertained to documentation and approvals
of employee master file data, proper evidence concerning approval of hours worked or rate changes
and deficiencies with reconciliations where payroll data was a major component. In 2008, we worked
to improve our
40
payroll process including data quality and internal controls. During the middle of 2008, we began
to relocate the payroll function from a shared services location in Midland, Texas to our corporate
offices in Houston, Texas. During this transition, the payroll department lost a significant
percentage of its staff which required their replacement with new personnel. We also increased the
overall size of the payroll department upon its relocation to Houston. With this change, we also
added new payroll practices and procedures. Additionally, throughout 2008, we worked on the
replacement of our existing payroll system with a new human resource information system, which
included a payroll system, that was initiated in late 2007. However, due to the nature and
functionality of the payroll system that was in place during 2008, our conversion to a new system
was delayed until January 2009. The implementation of a new human resource information system in
January 2009 allows for automated workflow and approval of information, including, among other
things, employee master file data, hours worked and rate changes. We believe that as the new
payroll department employees receive the proper training and with the implementation of the new
human resource and payroll system that was completed in January 2009, we will further strengthen
our control structure, increase our efficiency in processing payroll and provide transparency of
payroll related data, allowing for the remediation of this material weakness. We will begin our
process for evaluating the operating effectiveness of these controls during the second quarter of
2009. We anticipate that this evaluation process will be largely completed in the fourth quarter of
2009. Until this process is completed, we cannot conclude that this material weakness has been
remediated.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Except for the implementation of a new human resource information system described above,
there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the most
recently completed fiscal quarter, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
41
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In addition to various suits and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business,
we continue to be involved in litigation with some of our former executive officers. We do not
believe that the disposition of any of these items, including litigation with former management,
will result in a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows. For additional information on legal proceedings, see Note 9. Commitments
and Contingencies in Item 1. Financial Statements above.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes in our risk factors disclosed in our 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K dated as of, and filed with the SEC on, February 27, 2009. For a discussion of these risk
factors, see Item 1A. Risk Factors in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
However, we have identified the following additional risk factor:
In addition to the general economic, political and social instability risks of doing business
in certain foreign countries disclosed in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the operations and
financial condition of our business could be affected by union activity and general labor unrest in
Argentina. The labor expenses of our business in Argentina have increased, and could continue to
increase, as a result of the significant political influence of labor organizations and our
resulting inability to terminate employees and reduce wages in order to lower our cost structure.
Significant labor-related issues in Argentina, primarily related to not being able to
terminate the employment of field and office personnel due to the significant pressure and
influence of employees and labor organizations, have been exacerbated by the severe global economic
downturn and declining activity levels. In Argentina, labor organizations have substantial support
and have considerable political influence.
During the first quarter of 2009, we took appropriate legal actions to seek relief from the
Argentine government, enabling us to downsize our workforce and, in the near future, we may choose
to terminate a significant portion of our Argentine employee base. However, it is possible that the
government will adopt further measures that could increase salaries, require us to provide
additional benefits and severance payments, and other similar restrictive measures, all of which
would increase our costs and potentially further reduce the profitability, cash flow and liquidity
of our Argentine operations.
Any termination of employees in Argentina could result in increased pressure from the local
labor unions, labor disputes, seizure of our equipment, civil unrest at our facilities, and similar
developments that would be materially disruptive to our continuing operations in the country and
could have a negative effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. We
are also considering other alternatives for administrative relief with respect to our business and
operations in Argentina. The ultimate outcome of our actions is impossible to determine at this
time, but we are prepared to downsize our local operations or exit the region entirely.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
In October 2007, our board of directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $300.0
million which was effective through March 31, 2009. From the inception of the program in November
2007 through March 31, 2009, we repurchased approximately 13.4 million shares of our common stock
through open market transactions for an aggregate cost of approximately $167.3 million. The share
repurchase program expired per its terms on March 31, 2009 and was not extended.
42
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Although the Company did not repurchase any shares of common stock during the three months
ended March 31, 2009 under the share repurchase program described above, the Company did repurchase
the shares shown in the table below to satisfy tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of
restricted stock awarded to certain of our employees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Dollar Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Shares that may |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
|
yet be Purchased |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Under the Plans |
|
Period |
|
Shares Purchased (1) |
|
|
Paid per Share (2) |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
or Programs (3) |
|
January 1, 2009 to
January 31, 2009 |
|
|
7,557 |
|
|
$ |
4.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
132,667,925 |
|
February 1, 2009 to
February 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,667,925 |
|
March 1, 2009 to
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
7,557 |
|
|
$ |
4.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents shares repurchased to satisfy tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of
restricted stock awards. |
|
(2) |
|
The price paid per share on the vesting date with respect to the tax withholding repurchases
was determined using the closing price as quoted on the NYSE on the vesting date for awards
granted under the Key Energy Services, Inc. 2007 Equity and Cash Incentive Plan and the
previous business day for awards granted under the Key Energy Group, Inc. 1997 Incentive Plan. |
|
(3) |
|
Our publicly-announced share repurchase plan expired per its terms on March 31, 2009 and was
not extended. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITIES HOLDERS
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Restatement of Key Energy Services, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, File
No. 001-08038.) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Unanimous consent of the Board of Directors of Key Energy Services, Inc. dated January 11, 2000,
limiting the designation of the additional authorized shares to common stock. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2000, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Second Amended and Restated By-laws of Key Energy Services, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed on September 22, 2006, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Amendment to Second Amended and Restated By-laws of Key Energy Services, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed on November 2, 2007, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Amendments to Second Amended and Restated By-laws of Key Energy Services, Inc. adopted April 4,
2008. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed on April 9, 2008,
File No. 001-08038.) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Indenture, dated as of November 29, 2007, among Key Energy Services, Inc., the guarantors party
thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2007, File No. 001-08038.) |
43
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 29, 2007, among Key Energy Services, Inc., the
subsidiary guarantors of the Company party thereto, and Lehman Brothers Inc., Banc of America
Securities LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, as representatives of the several initial
purchasers named therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Companys Form 8-K
filed on November 30, 2007, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 22, 2008, among Key Marine Services, LLC, the
existing guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2008, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 13, 2009, among Key Energy Mexico, LLC, the
existing Guarantors and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.6 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
Letter Agreement, between Key
Energy Services, Inc. and William M. Austin, dated February 5, 2009. |
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Separation and Release Agreement,
by and between Key Energy Shared Services, LLC, Key Energy Services, Inc. and William M. Austin, dated February
11, 2009. |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of March 26, 2009, by and between Trey Whichard and Key Energy
Shared Services, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed on March 26, 2009, File No. 001-008038.) |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Amendment to Master Agreement, dated March 11, 2009, by and among Key Energy Services, Inc., Key
Energy services Cyprus Ltd., OOO Geostream Assets Management and L-Group. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 25, 2009,
File No. 001-08038.) |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement in which any
director or any executive officer participates. |
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
44
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
KEY ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Richard J. Alario
|
|
|
|
Richard J. Alario |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
Date: May 8, 2009
45
EXHIBITS INDEX
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Restatement of Key Energy Services, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, File
No. 001-08038.) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Unanimous consent of the Board of Directors of Key Energy Services, Inc. dated January 11, 2000,
limiting the designation of the additional authorized shares to common stock. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2000, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Second Amended and Restated By-laws of Key Energy Services, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed on September 22, 2006, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Amendment to Second Amended and Restated By-laws of Key Energy Services, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed on November 2, 2007, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Amendments to Second Amended and Restated By-laws of Key Energy Services, Inc. adopted April 4,
2008. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed on April 9, 2008,
File No. 001-08038.) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Indenture, dated as of November 29, 2007, among Key Energy Services, Inc., the guarantors party
thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2007, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 29, 2007, among Key Energy Services, Inc., the
subsidiary guarantors of the Company party thereto, and Lehman Brothers Inc., Banc of America
Securities LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, as representatives of the several initial
purchasers named therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Companys Form 8-K filed
on November 30, 2007, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 22, 2008, among Key Marine Services, LLC, the
existing guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2008, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 13, 2009, among Key Energy Mexico, LLC, the
existing Guarantors and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.6 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, File No. 001-08038.) |
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
Letter Agreement, between Key Energy Services, Inc. and William M. Austin, dated February 5, 2009. |
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Separation and Release Agreement, between Key Energy Shared Services, LLC, Key Energy Services, Inc. and William M. Austin, dated February 11, 2009. |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of March 26, 2009, by and between Trey Whichard and Key Energy Shared
Services, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Form
8-K filed on March 26, 2009, File No. 001-008038.) |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Amendment to Master Agreement, dated March 11, 2009, by and among Key Energy Services, Inc., Key
Energy services Cyprus Ltd., OOO Geostream Assets Management and L-Group. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 25, 2009, File
No. 001-08038.) |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement in which any
director or any executive officer participates. |
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |