e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-15149
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC.
Incorporated pursuant to the Laws of the State of DELAWARE
Internal Revenue Service Employer Identification No. 42-0991521
2140 LAKE PARK BLVD., RICHARDSON, TEXAS, 75080
(972-497-5000)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer þ
|
|
Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
Yes o No þ
As of July 22, 2010, the number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock, par
value $.01 per share, was 54,438,945.
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC.
FORM 10-Q
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
INDEX
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
61.9 |
|
|
$ |
124.3 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net of
allowances of $16.0 and $15.6 in 2010 and 2009,
respectively |
|
|
458.0 |
|
|
|
357.0 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
338.4 |
|
|
|
250.2 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
39.1 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
48.3 |
|
|
|
67.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
969.5 |
|
|
|
833.9 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net |
|
|
318.2 |
|
|
|
329.6 |
|
GOODWILL |
|
|
253.8 |
|
|
|
257.4 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
|
|
66.4 |
|
|
|
74.6 |
|
OTHER ASSETS, net |
|
|
59.3 |
|
|
|
48.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
1,667.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,543.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
314.7 |
|
|
|
238.2 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
315.4 |
|
|
|
317.9 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
643.8 |
|
|
|
593.8 |
|
LONG-TERM DEBT |
|
|
349.6 |
|
|
|
193.8 |
|
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS, OTHER THAN PENSIONS |
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
PENSIONS |
|
|
69.0 |
|
|
|
66.7 |
|
OTHER LIABILITIES |
|
|
69.0 |
|
|
|
71.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,144.6 |
|
|
|
939.5 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 25,000,000
shares authorized, no shares issued or
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 200,000,000
shares authorized, 86,026,162 shares and
85,567,485 shares issued for 2010 and 2009,
respectively |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
850.9 |
|
|
|
839.1 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
588.8 |
|
|
|
558.6 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(25.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost, 31,589,468 shares and
29,292,512 shares for 2010 and 2009,
respectively |
|
|
(892.9 |
) |
|
|
(793.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
522.6 |
|
|
|
604.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
1,667.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,543.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited, in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
NET SALES |
|
$ |
872.1 |
|
|
$ |
784.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,516.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,364.5 |
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
|
|
607.4 |
|
|
|
556.5 |
|
|
|
1,077.1 |
|
|
|
999.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
264.7 |
|
|
|
227.5 |
|
|
|
439.1 |
|
|
|
365.2 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
180.5 |
|
|
|
164.3 |
|
|
|
349.6 |
|
|
|
319.3 |
|
Losses (gains) and other expenses, net |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Restructuring charges |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
Income from equity method investments |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational income from continuing operations |
|
|
79.3 |
|
|
|
59.6 |
|
|
|
79.8 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
INTEREST EXPENSE, net |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE, net |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before
income taxes |
|
|
76.1 |
|
|
|
57.5 |
|
|
|
74.1 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
|
|
27.4 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
48.7 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
48.3 |
|
|
$ |
31.7 |
|
|
$ |
46.7 |
|
|
$ |
13.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE BASIC: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE DILUTED: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
55.1 |
|
|
|
55.4 |
|
|
|
55.6 |
|
|
|
55.3 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
56.3 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
|
|
|
56.8 |
|
|
|
55.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and the Year Ended December 31, 2009
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
at Cost |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Income |
|
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 |
|
|
84.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
805.6 |
|
|
$ |
538.8 |
|
|
$ |
(98.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(787.8 |
) |
|
$ |
458.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51.1 |
|
|
$ |
51.1 |
|
Dividends, $0.56 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59.5 |
|
|
|
59.5 |
|
Pension and postretirement liability changes, net
of tax provision of $6.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives and other, net of tax provision of $15.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
30.4 |
|
Common stock issued |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock purchases (183,484 shares at $30.55
average price per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits of stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other tax related items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
149.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
85.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
839.1 |
|
|
|
558.6 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(793.4 |
) |
|
|
604.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
$ |
46.7 |
|
Dividends, $0.30 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.7 |
) |
|
|
(18.7 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives and other, net of tax provision of $5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
Common stock issued |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock purchases (2,296,956 shares at
$43.32 average price per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99.5 |
) |
|
|
(99.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits of stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AS OF JUNE 30, 2010 |
|
|
86.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
850.9 |
|
|
$ |
588.8 |
|
|
$ |
(25.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(892.9 |
) |
|
$ |
522.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(Unaudited, in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
46.7 |
|
|
$ |
13.6 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from equity method investments |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Dividends from affiliates |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Restructuring expenses, net of cash paid |
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
2.6 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative contracts |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
Return of collateral for hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.4 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
Other items, net |
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and divestitures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
(115.4 |
) |
|
|
(60.5 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(107.8 |
) |
|
|
23.4 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
8.3 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
81.7 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
Income taxes payable and receivable |
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
(13.6 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(26.0 |
) |
|
|
82.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the disposal of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(19.7 |
) |
|
|
(21.6 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of businesses |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Acquisition of business |
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
(23.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.0 |
) |
Proceeds from sales and maturities of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(47.3 |
) |
|
|
(20.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Long-term payments |
|
|
(35.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
Issuance of senior unsecured notes |
|
|
199.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on revolving credit facility |
|
|
(44.5 |
) |
|
|
(100.8 |
) |
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Payments of deferred financing costs |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(99.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
Excess tax benefits related to share-based payments |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(16.2 |
) |
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
(117.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(62.5 |
) |
|
|
(55.0 |
) |
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
124.3 |
|
|
|
122.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
61.9 |
|
|
$ |
65.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (net of refunds) |
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
12.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. General:
References in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to we, our, us, LII or the Company
refer to Lennox International Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2010, the accompanying
unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009, the accompanying unaudited Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and the accompanying unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for
the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 should be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have
been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim
financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. The
accompanying consolidated financial statements contain all material adjustments, consisting
principally of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial
position, results of operations and cash flows. Certain information and footnote disclosures
normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to applicable rules and regulations, although we
believe that the disclosures herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.
The operating results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that
may be expected for the full year.
Our fiscal year ends on December 31 and our quarters are each comprised of 13 weeks. For
convenience, throughout these financial statements, the 13 weeks comprising each quarterly period
are denoted by the last day of the respective calendar quarter.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions about
future events. These estimates and the underlying assumptions affect the amounts of assets and
liabilities reported, disclosures about contingent assets and liabilities, and reported amounts of
revenues and expenses. Such estimates include the valuation of accounts receivable, inventories,
goodwill, intangible assets, and other long-lived assets, contingencies, guarantee obligations,
indemnifications, and assumptions used in the calculation of income taxes, pension and
postretirement medical benefits, among others. These estimates and assumptions are based on our
best estimates and judgment.
We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and
other factors, including the current economic environment. We believe these estimates and
assumptions to be reasonable under the circumstances and adjust such estimates and assumptions when
facts and circumstances dictate.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
2. Inventories:
Components of inventories are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
240.8 |
|
|
$ |
182.3 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
Raw materials and repair parts |
|
|
161.6 |
|
|
|
132.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410.5 |
|
|
|
322.2 |
|
Excess of current cost over last-in, first-out cost |
|
|
(72.1 |
) |
|
|
(72.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
338.4 |
|
|
$ |
250.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
3. Goodwill:
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2010, in
total and by segment, are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heating & |
|
|
Heating & |
|
|
Service |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cooling |
|
|
Cooling |
|
|
Experts |
|
|
Refrigeration |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of January 1, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
33.7 |
|
|
$ |
31.3 |
|
|
$ |
314.9 |
|
|
$ |
85.5 |
|
|
$ |
465.4 |
|
Accumulated impairment loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(208.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(208.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
106.9 |
|
|
|
85.5 |
|
|
|
257.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
317.4 |
|
|
|
81.8 |
|
|
|
461.8 |
|
Accumulated impairment loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(208.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(208.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33.7 |
|
|
$ |
28.9 |
|
|
$ |
109.4 |
|
|
$ |
81.8 |
|
|
$ |
253.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the second quarter of 2010, our Service Experts segment acquired a
company which resulted in additional goodwill of $3.5 million. The other changes
are related to fluctuations in foreign currency translation rates. |
4. Derivatives:
Cash Flow Hedges
We include (gains) losses in accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL) in connection with
our commodity cash flow hedges. The (gains) losses related to commodity price hedges are expected
to be reclassified into earnings within the next 18 months based on the prices of the commodities
at settlement date. Assuming that commodity prices remain constant, $0.7 million of derivative
losses are expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months. Commodity futures
contracts that are designated as cash flow hedges and are in place as of June 30, 2010 are
scheduled to mature through November 2011.
On June 12, 2009, we entered into a $100 million pay-fixed, receive-variable interest rate
swap with a financial institution at a fixed interest rate of 2.66%. The variable portion of the
interest rate swap is tied to the 1-Month LIBOR (the benchmark interest rate). The interest rates
under both the interest rate swap and the underlying debt are reset, the swap is settled with the
counterparty, and interest is paid, on a monthly basis. The interest rate swap expires October 12,
2012. We account for the interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge. The (gains) losses related to
our interest rate swap are expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next 28 months
based on the term of the swap. Assuming that the benchmark interest rate remains constant, $1.3
million of derivative losses are expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next 12
months.
We recorded the following amounts related to our cash flow hedges (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
As of |
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Commodity Price Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses (gains) included in AOCL, net of tax |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
(7.2 |
) |
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
4.1 |
|
Interest Rate Swap: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses included in AOCL, net of tax |
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
Benefit from income taxes |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
8
We had the following outstanding commodity futures contracts designated as cash flow hedges
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
As of |
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(pounds) |
|
(pounds) |
Copper |
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
Derivatives not Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
For commodity derivatives not designated as cash flow hedges, we follow the same hedging
strategy as for derivatives designated as cash flow hedges. We elect not to designate these
derivatives as cash flow hedges at the inception of the arrangement. We had the following
outstanding commodity futures contracts not designated as cash flow hedges (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
As of |
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(pounds) |
|
(pounds) |
Copper |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Aluminum |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
During the second quarter of 2010, we entered into foreign currency forward contracts with
notional amounts of $54.3 million and £6.0 million, of which $19.0 million and £1.5 million were
outstanding at June 30, 2010.
Information About the Location and Amounts of Derivative Instruments
For information on the location and amounts of derivative fair values in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets and derivative gains and losses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, see
the tabular information presented below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments |
|
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity futures contracts |
|
Other Assets (Current) |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
Other Assets (Current) |
|
$ |
11.1 |
|
Commodity futures contracts |
|
Other Assets (Non-current) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets (Non-current) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity futures contracts |
|
Other Assets (Current) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets (Current) |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Asset for Derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity futures contracts |
|
Accrued Expenses |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
Accrued Expenses |
|
$ |
|
|
Commodity futures contracts |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
Accrued Expenses |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
Accrued Expenses |
|
|
2.0 |
|
Interest rate swap |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity futures contracts |
|
Accrued Expenses |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
Accrued Expenses |
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Accrued Expenses |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
Accrued Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liability for Derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Loss or (Gain) Reclassified |
|
Amount of Loss or (Gain) Reclassified |
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow |
|
from AOCL into Income |
|
from AOCL into Income (Effective |
|
Hedging Relationships |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Portion) |
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Commodity futures contracts |
|
Cost of Goods Sold |
|
$ |
(4.8 |
) |
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
(7.6 |
) |
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
Interest rate swap |
|
Interest Expense, net |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4.2 |
) |
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
(6.4 |
) |
|
$ |
17.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of (Gain) or Loss Recognized |
|
Amount of (Gain) or Loss Recognized |
Derivatives in Cash Flow |
|
in Income on Derivatives |
|
in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective |
Hedging Relationships |
|
(Ineffective Portion) |
|
Portion) |
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Commodity futures contracts |
|
Losses (Gains) and Other Expenses, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of (Gain) or Loss |
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated |
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
Amount of (Gain) or Loss Recognized in Income on |
|
as Hedging Instruments |
|
Derivatives |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Commodity futures contracts |
|
Losses (Gains) and Other Expenses, net |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
(1.8 |
) |
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Losses (Gains) and Other Expenses, net |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For more information on the fair value of these derivative instruments, see Note 14.
5. Income Taxes:
As of June 30, 2010, we had approximately $1.6 million in total gross unrecognized tax
benefits. Of this amount, $1.1 million (net of federal benefit on state issues), if recognized,
would be recorded through the Consolidated Statement of Operations. As of June 30, 2010, we had
recognized $0.1 million (net of federal tax benefits) in interest and penalties in income tax
expense.
We are currently under examination for our U.S. federal income taxes for 2010, 2009 and 2008
and are subject to examination by numerous other taxing authorities in the U.S. and in
jurisdictions such as Australia, Belgium, France, Canada, and Germany. We are generally no longer
subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by taxing authorities
for years before 2002.
Since January 1, 2010, numerous states including Colorado, Maine, Utah, the District of
Columbia and California have enacted legislation effective for tax years beginning on or after
January 1, 2010, including requirements for combined reporting and changes to apportionment
methods.
6. Commitments and Contingencies:
We are subject to contingencies that arise in the normal course of business, including product
warranties and other product related contingencies, pending litigation, environmental matters and
other guarantees or claims.
We use a combination of third-party insurance and self-insurance plans (large deductible or
captive) to provide protection against claims relating to contingencies such as workers
compensation, general liability, product liability, property damage, aviation liability, directors
and officers liability, auto liability, physical damage and other exposures. Self-insurance
expense and liabilities are actuarially determined based on our
10
historical claims information, as
well as industry factors and trends and because we have a captive insurance company, we are
required to maintain specified levels of liquid assets from which we must pay claims. The majority
of our self-insured risks (excluding auto liability and physical damage) will be paid over an
extended period of time. There have been no material changes since our latest fiscal year-end. We
also maintain third-party insurance coverage for risks not retained within our large deductible or
captive insurance plans. The self-insurance liabilities recorded in Accrued Expenses in the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets were $64.2 million and $60.4 million as of June 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Total liabilities for estimated warranty are included in the following captions on the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Accrued Expenses |
|
$ |
29.6 |
|
|
$ |
31.5 |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
75.9 |
|
|
$ |
81.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The changes in the total warranty liabilities for the first six months of 2010 were as follows
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Total warranty liability as of December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
81.5 |
|
Payments made in 2010 |
|
|
(12.9 |
) |
Changes resulting from issuance of new warranties |
|
|
14.2 |
|
Changes in estimates associated with pre-existing liabilities |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total warranty liability as of June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
75.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Accrued product quality issue (not covered under warranty) |
|
$ |
18.9 |
|
|
$ |
21.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the end of each accounting period, we evaluate our warranty liabilities and during the
second quarter of each year, we perform a complete reevaluation of our warranty liabilities. As a
result of our annual evaluation, we have recorded a reduction in warranty liabilities that is the
principal amount contained within the changes in estimates associated with pre-existing liabilities
of $6.1 million above.
We incur the risk of liability claims for the installation and service of heating and air
conditioning products, and we maintain liabilities for those claims that we self-insure. We are
involved in various claims and lawsuits related to our products. Our product liability insurance
policies have limits that, if exceeded, may result in substantial costs that could have an adverse
effect on our results of operations. In addition, warranty claims are not covered by our product
liability insurance and certain product liability claims may also not be covered by our product
liability insurance. There have been no material changes in the circumstances since our latest
fiscal year-end.
We also may incur costs related to our products that may not be covered under our warranties
and are not covered by insurance, and we may, from time to time, repair or replace installed
products experiencing quality issues in order to satisfy our customers and to protect our brand.
These product quality issues may be caused by vendor-supplied components that fail to meet required
specifications.
We have identified a product quality issue in a heating and cooling product line produced in
2006 and 2007 that we believe results from a vendor-supplied materials quality issue. We have
recorded an expense of $24.6 million in 2009 for the portion of the issue that is probable and can
be reasonably estimated based upon the current data available and $18.9 million remained accrued as
of June 30, 2010. There were no provisions to 2010. We may incur additional charges in the future
as more information becomes available. The expense for this product quality issue, and the related
liability, is not included in the tables related to our estimated warranty
11
liabilities. The
expense related to this product quality issue was classified in Cost of Goods Sold in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations and the related liability is included in Accrued Expenses in
the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We estimate the costs to settle pending litigation based on experience involving similar claims and
specific facts known. We do not believe that any current or pending or threatened litigation with
have a material adverse effect on our financial position. Litigation and arbitration, however,
involve uncertainties and it is possible that the eventual outcome of litigation could adversely
affect our results of operations for a particular period. We are the defendant in a class action
lawsuit related to certain hearth products we produced and sold that claims such products are
hazardous and that consumers were not adequately warned. We recorded charges totaling $5.6 million
related to this matter during the second quarter of 2010 and we may incur additional charges in the
future. These charges are included in Selling, General and Administrative Expenses and Losses
(Gains) and Other Expenses, Net in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Our obligations under the Lake Park Lease are secured by a pledge of our interest in the
leased property and are also guaranteed by us and certain of our subsidiaries. The Lake Park Lease,
as amended, contains restrictive covenants that are consistent with those of our domestic revolving
credit facility. We are in compliance with these financial covenants as of June 30, 2010.
7. Lines of Credit and Financing Arrangements:
Long Term Debt and Lines of Credit
The following tables summarize our outstanding debt obligations and the classification in the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description of Obligations |
|
Short-Term |
|
|
Current |
|
|
Long-Term |
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
Debt |
|
|
Maturities |
|
|
Maturities |
|
|
Total |
|
Domestic revolving credit facility |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
132.0 |
|
|
$ |
132.0 |
|
Senior unsecured notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200.0 |
|
|
|
200.0 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
Foreign obligations |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
349.6 |
|
|
$ |
356.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description of Obligations |
|
Short-Term |
|
|
Current |
|
|
Long-Term |
|
|
|
|
As of June 31, 2009 |
|
Debt |
|
|
Maturities |
|
|
Maturities |
|
|
Total |
|
Domestic promissory notes (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35.0 |
|
Domestic revolving credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176.5 |
|
|
|
176.5 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
Foreign obligations |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
35.5 |
|
|
$ |
193.8 |
|
|
$ |
231.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The domestic promissory notes that were due to mature on June 1, 2010 were
prepaid during the first quarter of 2010. |
As of June 30, 2010, we had outstanding borrowings of $132.0 million under the $650 million
domestic revolving credit facility and $72.0 million was committed to standby letters of credit.
All of the remaining $446.0 million was available for future borrowings after consideration of
covenant limitations. The facility matures in October 2012. As of June 30, 2010, we were in
compliance with all covenant requirements.
We have additional borrowing capacity through several of our foreign subsidiaries used
primarily to finance seasonal borrowing needs. We had $6.1 million and $2.5 million of obligations
outstanding through our foreign subsidiaries as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. Available borrowing capacity at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, under foreign
facilities was $11.9 million and $12.6 million, respectively.
The domestic revolving credit facility includes a subfacility for swingline loans of up to $50
million and provides for the issuance of letters of credit for the full amount of the credit
facility. Our weighted average borrowing rate on the facility was 0.95% and 0.84% as of June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Our domestic revolving credit facility contains financial covenants relating to leverage and
interest coverage.
12
Other covenants contained in the domestic revolving credit facility restrict,
among other things, mergers, asset dispositions, guarantees, debt, liens, acquisitions,
investments, affiliate transactions and our ability to make restricted payments. The financial
covenants require us to maintain defined levels of Consolidated Indebtedness to Adjusted EBITDA
Ratio and a Cash Flow (defined as EBITDA minus capital expenditures) to Net Interest Expense Ratio.
The required ratios under our domestic revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2010 are detailed
below:
|
|
|
Consolidated Indebtedness to Adjusted EBITDA Ratio no greater than
|
|
3.5 : 1.0 |
Cash Flow to Net Interest Expense Ratio no less than
|
|
3.0 : 1.0 |
Our domestic revolving credit facility contains customary events of default. These events of
default include nonpayment of principal or interest, breach of covenants or other restrictions or
requirements, default on certain other indebtedness or receivables securitizations (cross default), and
bankruptcy. A cross default under our revolving credit facility could occur if:
|
|
|
we fail to pay any principal or interest when due on any other indebtedness or
receivables securitization of at least $40.0 million; or |
|
|
|
|
we are in default in the performance of, or compliance with, any term of any other indebtedness or receivables securitization in an
aggregate principal amount of at least $40.0 million, or any other condition exists which would give the holders
the right to declare such indebtedness due and payable prior to its stated maturity. |
Each of our major debt agreements contains agreements by which
a default under one agreement causes a default in the others. If a cross default under the revolving credit facility, our senior unsecured notes, or our revolving
period asset securitization program was to occur, it could have a wider impact on our liquidity than might
otherwise occur from a default of a single debt instrument or lease commitment.
If any event of default occurs and is continuing, lenders with a majority of the aggregate
commitments may require the administrative agent to terminate our right to borrow under our
domestic revolving credit facility and accelerate amounts due under our domestic revolving credit facility (except for a bankruptcy
event of default, in which case such amounts will automatically become due and payable and the
lenders commitments will automatically terminate).
On May 6, 2010, we issued $200.0 million of senior unsecured notes due May 15, 2017 bearing
fixed interest at 4.90% as a result of a public offering of securities. We received proceeds of
$199.8 million from the offering for a yield of 4.91%. We also paid and capitalized $1.9 million
of debt issue costs related to the issuance. We will pay interest on the notes semiannually on May
15 and November 15.
The notes are guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by each of our domestic subsidiaries
that guarantee payment by us of any indebtedness under our domestic revolving credit facility. The
indenture governing the notes contains covenants that, among other things, limit our ability and
the ability of the subsidiary guarantors to: create or incur certain liens; enter into certain sale
and leaseback transactions; enter into certain mergers, consolidations and transfers of
substantially all of our assets; and transfer certain properties. The indenture also contains a
cross default provision which is triggered if we default on other debt of at least $75 million in
principal which is then accelerated, and such acceleration is not rescinded within 30 days of the
notice date.
During the first quarter of 2010, our captive insurance subsidiary entered into an agreement
in which cash was placed into a trust for the benefit of a third-party insurance provider. The
purpose of the trust is to pay Workers Compensation claims for policy years 2003 2009 until the
liabilities are fully extinguished. These policies were written by the third-party insurance
provider, and then reinsured by our captive insurance subsidiary. This transaction was classified
as restricted cash on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The balance at June 30, 2010
was $23.8 million.
Asset Securitization
Under a revolving period asset securitization arrangement (ASA), we are eligible to sell
beneficial interests in a portion of our trade accounts receivable to participating financial
institutions for cash.
The ASA contains certain restrictive covenants relating to the quality of our
accounts receivable and cross-default provisions with our Credit Agreement. The administrative
agent under the ASA is also a participant in our Credit Agreement. The administrative agent has an
investment grade credit rating. We continue to evaluate its creditworthiness and have no reason to
believe it will not perform under the ASA. As of June 30, 2010, we were in compliance with all
covenant requirements.
13
The ASA provides for a maximum securitization amount of $100.0 million or 100% of the net pool
balance as defined by the ASA. However, eligibility for securitization is limited based on the
amount and quality of the qualifying accounts receivable and is calculated monthly. The beneficial
interest sold cannot exceed the maximum amount even if our qualifying accounts receivable is
greater than the maximum amount at any point in time. The eligible amounts available and beneficial
interests sold were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Eligible amount available under the ASA
on qualified accounts receivable |
|
$ |
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
72.5 |
|
Beneficial interest sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining amount available |
|
$ |
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
72.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the ASA, we pay certain discount fees to use the program and have the facility available
to us. These fees relate to both the used and unused portions of the securitization. The used fee
is based on the beneficial interest sold and calculated on the average floating commercial paper
rate determined by the purchaser of the beneficial interest, plus a program fee of 1.15%. The rate
was 1.58% and 1.38% as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The unused fee is
based on 102% of the maximum available amount less the beneficial interest sold and calculated at
0.5% fixed rate throughout the term of the agreement. We recorded these fees in Selling, General
and Administrative Expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The amounts
recorded were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Discount fees |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
8. Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans:
The components of net periodic benefit cost were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Benefits |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Settlements or curtailments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Benefits |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(9.7 |
) |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Settlements or curtailments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
8.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
The fair values of our pension plan assets, by asset category, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of |
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets Category: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
Commingled pools / Collective
Trusts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. equity (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.9 |
|
International equity (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.8 |
|
Fixed income (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75.2 |
|
Mutual funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. equity (4) |
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
International equity (4) |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Fixed income (5) |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Balanced pension trust (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
International equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Deposit pension fund (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
Guaranteed investment contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
51.8 |
|
|
$ |
169.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
221.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional information about assets measured at Net Asset Value per share (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frequency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(if currently |
|
Redemption |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
eligible) |
|
Notice Period |
Assets Category: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commingled pools / Collective Trusts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. equity (1) |
|
$ |
28.9 |
|
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
International equity (2) |
|
|
43.8 |
|
|
Monthly |
|
10 15 days |
Fixed income (3) |
|
|
75.2 |
|
|
Quarterly |
|
15 days |
Mutual funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. equity (4) |
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
International equity (4) |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
Fixed income (5) |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
Balanced pension trust (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. equity |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
Daily |
|
5 days |
International equity |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
Daily |
|
5 days |
Bonds |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
Daily |
|
5 days |
Deposit pension fund (7) |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
Daily |
|
7 days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
213.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This category includes investments primarily in U.S. equity
securities that include large, mid and small capitalization
companies. |
|
(2) |
|
This category includes investments primarily in non-U.S. equity
securities that include large, mid and small capitalization
companies in large developed markets as well as emerging markets
equities. |
|
(3) |
|
This category includes investments in U.S. investment grade and
high yield fixed income securities, non-U.S. fixed income
securities and emerging markets fixed income securities. |
|
(4) |
|
These funds seek capital appreciation and generally invest in
common stocks of U.S. and Non-U.S. issuers. They may invest in
growth stocks or value stocks. |
15
|
|
|
(5) |
|
This fund seeks to provide inflation protection. It currently
invests at least 80% of its assets in inflation-indexed bonds
issued by the U.S. government. It may invest in bonds of any
maturity, though the fund typically maintains a dollar-weighted
average maturity of 7 to 20 years. |
|
(6) |
|
The investment objectives of the fund are to provide long-term
capital growth and income by investing primarily in a
well-diversified, balanced portfolio of Canadian common stocks,
bonds and money market securities. The fund also holds a portion
of its assets in U.S. and non-U.S. equities. |
|
(7) |
|
This fund invests in United Kingdom money market instruments and
includes cash, bank deposits and short-term fixed interest
investments. |
9. Stock-Based Compensation:
Our 2010 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated provides for various long-term incentive
awards, which include stock options, performance share units, restricted stock units and stock
appreciation rights. Net stock-based compensation expense of $3.4 million and $3.1 million was
recognized for the second quarters of 2010 and 2009, respectively. Net stock-based compensation
expense of $7.7 million and $5.2 million was recognized for the first six months of 2010 and 2009,
respectively. These expenses are included in Selling, General and Administrative Expenses in the
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
10. Restructuring Charges:
As part of our strategic priorities of manufacturing and sourcing excellence and expense
reduction, we have initiated various manufacturing rationalization actions designed to lower our
cost structure. We also continue to reorganize our North American distribution network in order to
better serve our customers needs by deploying parts and equipment inventory closer to them. We
have also initiated a number of activities that rationalize and reorganize various support and
administrative functions to reduce ongoing selling and administrative expenses.
Information on Total Restructuring Charges and Related Reserves
Restructuring charges incurred include the following amounts (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Manufacturing rationalizations |
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
7.7 |
|
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
Reorganization of distribution network |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Reorganizations of corporate and
business unit selling and
administrative functions |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
|
$ |
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the $3.2 million of restructuring charges recorded in the second quarter of
2010 are discussed in greater detail in later sections of this footnote.
In the second quarter of 2009, restructuring charges for manufacturing rationalizations
included $0.8 million related to the consolidation of Residential Heating & Cooling manufacturing
operations from Blackville, South Carolina into our operations in Orangeburg, South Carolina and
Saltillo, Mexico. Manufacturing rationalizations recorded in the second quarter of 2009 also
included $0.3 million of charges related to the transition of production of certain Residential
Heating & Cooling products from our Marshalltown, Iowa manufacturing facility to our manufacturing
operations in Saltillo, Mexico and $0.2 million of charges related to the closure of our
Refrigeration operations in Danville, Illinois and the consolidation of Danville manufacturing,
support and warehouse functions into our Tifton, Georgia and Stone Mountain, Georgia operations.
In the second quarter of 2009, restructuring charges related to reorganizations of corporate
and business unit selling and administrative functions included $2.1 million related to the
reorganization of our Commercial Heating & Cooling business units selling and administrative
functions in Northern Europe and $0.7 million related to the reorganization of the management
structure of our Refrigeration administrative and support functions across the globe.
Restructuring charges recorded in the second quarter of 2009 also included $0.2 million related to
the centralization of certain Service Experts administrative and support functions and $0.2 million
related to the reorganization of certain corporate administrative functions.
Restructuring reserves are included in Accrued Expenses in the accompanying Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
16
The table below details activity within the restructuring reserves for the first
half of 2010 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
Charged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash |
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
to |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
Utilization |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Description of Reserves |
|
2009 |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Utilization |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
2010 |
|
Severance and related expense |
|
$ |
21.1 |
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
(15.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.8 |
) |
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
Asset write-offs and accelerated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Equipment moves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease termination |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring reserves |
|
$ |
22.2 |
|
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
|
$ |
(18.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.9 |
) |
|
$ |
9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing Rationalization Activities
Information regarding the restructuring charges related to manufacturing rationalizations is
as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
|
Incurred in |
|
|
Incurred to |
|
|
Expected to |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Date |
|
|
be Incurred |
|
Severance and related expense |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
29.7 |
|
|
$ |
29.8 |
|
Asset write-offs and accelerated depreciation |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
Equipment moves |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7.7 |
|
|
$ |
47.2 |
|
|
$ |
50.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring expense for manufacturing rationalization activities related to the following:
|
|
|
In the first quarter of 2010, we began to exit certain Refrigeration manufacturing
operations in Milperra, Australia. Total restructuring charges related to this action
recorded in the first half of 2010 were $5.2 million, which was composed of severance of
$4.0 million, asset write-offs of $1.1 million and other charges of $0.1 million.
During the second quarter of 2010 we recorded $0.1 million of restructuring charges
related to this action. This action was substantially completed during the first half
of 2010. |
|
|
|
|
In the fourth quarter of 2009, we began the consolidation of certain Refrigeration
manufacturing operations located in Parets, Spain into our existing operations in Genas,
France. During the first half of 2010 we recorded restructuring charges totaling $1.5
million related to this action, which was composed of $0.7 of asset write-offs and $0.8
million of severance. During the second quarter of 2010 we recorded $1.3 million of
restructuring charges related to this action. This action was substantially completed
during the first half of 2010. |
|
|
|
|
In the first quarter of 2009, we began the consolidation of Residential Heating &
Cooling manufacturing operations from Blackville, South Carolina into our operations in
Orangeburg, South Carolina and Saltillo, Mexico. Total restructuring charges recorded
related to this action in the first half of 2010 were $1.0 million, primarily composed
of equipment move costs, accelerated depreciation, severance and other plant closure
costs. During the second quarter of 2010 we recorded $0.6 million of restructuring
charges related to this action. The consolidation is expected to be completed during
the first quarter of 2011. |
|
|
|
|
Additionally, during the first half of 2010, we reversed $0.3 million of
restructuring severance charges related to the consolidation of certain Commercial
Heating & Cooling manufacturing operations located in Mions, France into our existing
manufacturing operations in Longvic, France to adjust estimated amounts to actual. |
Reorganization of Distribution Network
In the fourth quarter of 2008, we commenced the transition of activities currently performed
at our North American Parts Center in Des Moines, Iowa to other locations, including our North
American Distribution
17
Center in Marshalltown, Iowa. We incurred $0.2 million of restructuring
charges, which was composed of severance, during the second quarter and first half of 2010 related
to this transition. To date, we have incurred $3.2 million, which was composed primarily of
severance, and we expect the total cost to be $3.6 million related to this restructuring activity.
The total cost of this restructuring activity will be composed of severance of $2.6 million,
equipment moving costs of $0.3 million and other costs of $0.7 million. The transition is
expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2010.
Reorganizations of Corporate and Business Unit Selling and Administrative Functions
Information regarding the restructuring charges related to the reorganization of corporate and
business unit selling and administrative functions is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
|
Incurred in |
|
|
Incurred to |
|
|
Expected to |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Date |
|
|
be Incurred |
|
Employee relocation |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
Severance and related expense |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
Asset write-offs and accelerated depreciation |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Lease termination |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Other |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
26.6 |
|
|
$ |
27.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We incurred costs related to the following restructuring actions in our selling and
administrative activities:
|
|
|
In the third quarter of 2009, we initiated the relocation of Residential Heating &
Cooling factory-built fireplace headquarters from Orange, California to Nashville,
Tennessee and the consolidation of customer and technical service departments into our existing hearth products plant in
Union City, Tennessee. As a result of this action, we recorded restructuring charges of
$1.6 million during first half of 2010, which primarily consisted of employee relocation
and lease termination costs. During the second quarter of 2010 we recorded $0.2 million
of restructuring charges related to this action. Total anticipated restructuring charges
related to this action are expected to total $4.1 million and consist principally of
severance, recruiting, relocation costs and lease termination costs. We substantially
completed this action during the first half of 2010. |
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2009, we reorganized the management structure of our
Refrigeration administrative and support functions across the globe. As a result of
this action, we recorded restructuring severance charges of $0.3 million during the
first half of 2010. During the second quarter of 2010 we recorded $0.2 million of
restructuring charges related to this action. The action will be completed during the
third quarter of 2010. |
|
|
|
|
During the second quarter of 2010, we recorded restructuring charges incurred related
to the reorganization of certain administrative operations of an acquired company within
our Service Experts segment. In connection with this action, we recorded asset
write-offs totaling $0.3 million. Total anticipated restructuring costs associated with
this action are $0.8 million and will consist of primarily of asset write-offs and lease
termination costs. This action is expected to be completed by the end of the third
quarter of 2010. |
|
|
|
|
In the third quarter of 2008, our Commercial Heating & Cooling business unit began to
reorganize its selling and administrative functions in Northern Europe through a series
of restructuring actions. Total restructuring charges recorded in the second quarter and
first half of 2010 related to this action were $0.2 million. This action was completed
in the second quarter of 2010. |
11. Discontinued Operations:
Service Experts Discontinued Operations
A summary of net trade sales and operational losses classified as Discontinued Operations in the
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations are detailed below (in millions):
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net trade sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
12.6 |
|
Operational loss from
discontinued
operations(1) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in the operational loss from discontinued operations are
losses on the disposal of the assets and liabilities of the service
centers sold of $0.4 million and $0.3 million for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and gains on disposal of the
assets and liabilities of service centers sold of $1.0 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2009. Included in operational loss from
discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009, was a charge of $6.2 million for litigation related to the sale
of a service center in 2004. |
The assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations are presented as follows in the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
As of |
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Assets of discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
12. Earnings Per Share:
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing
net income by the sum of the weighted-average number of shares and the number of equivalent shares
assumed outstanding, if dilutive, under our stock-based compensation plans.
The computations of basic and diluted earnings per share for Income from Continuing Operations
were as follows (in millions, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the |
|
|
For the |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
48.3 |
|
|
$ |
31.7 |
|
|
$ |
46.7 |
|
|
$ |
13.6 |
|
Add: Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
48.7 |
|
|
$ |
35.9 |
|
|
$ |
47.4 |
|
|
$ |
18.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
55.1 |
|
|
|
55.4 |
|
|
|
55.6 |
|
|
|
55.3 |
|
Effect of diluted securities attributable
to stock-based payments |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
56.3 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
|
|
|
56.8 |
|
|
|
55.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share from continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Stock appreciation rights were outstanding, but not included in the diluted earnings per share
calculation because the assumed exercise of such rights would have been anti-dilutive. The details
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Number of shares |
|
|
546,289 |
|
|
|
625,334 |
|
Price ranges per share |
|
$ |
36.94 |
|
|
$ |
34.52 - 37.11 |
|
19
13. Reportable Business Segments:
We operate in four reportable business segments of the heating, ventilation, air conditioning
and refrigeration (HVACR) industry. Our segments are organized primarily by the nature of the
products and services provided. The table below details the nature of the operations of each
reportable segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
Product or Services |
|
Markets Served |
|
Geographic Areas |
Residential Heating & Cooling
|
|
Heating
|
|
Residential Replacement
|
|
United States |
|
|
Air Conditioning
|
|
Residential New
|
|
Canada |
|
|
Hearth Products
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Heating & Cooling
|
|
Rooftop Products
|
|
Light Commercial
|
|
United States |
|
|
Chillers
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
|
Air Handlers
|
|
|
|
Europe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service Experts
|
|
Equipment Sales
Installation
|
|
Residential
Light Commercial
|
|
United States
Canada |
|
|
Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refrigeration
|
|
Unit Coolers
|
|
Light Commercial
|
|
United States |
|
|
Condensing Units
|
|
Food Preservation and
|
|
Canada |
|
|
Other Commercial
|
|
Non-Food/Industrial
|
|
Europe |
|
|
Refrigeration Products
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
|
|
|
|
South America |
Transactions between segments, such as products sold to Service Experts by the
Residential Heating & Cooling segment, are recorded on an arms-length basis using the market price
for these products. The eliminations of these intercompany sales and any associated profit are
noted in the reconciliation of segment results to the income from continuing operations before
income taxes below.
We use segment profit or loss as the primary measure of profitability to evaluate operating
performance and to allocate capital resources.
Our corporate costs include those costs related to corporate functions such as legal, internal
audit, treasury, human resources, tax compliance and senior executive staff. Corporate costs also
include the long-term share-based incentive awards provided to employees throughout LII. We
recorded these share-based awards as Corporate costs as they are determined at the discretion of
the Board of Directors and based on the historical practice of doing so for internal reporting
purposes.
Net sales and segment profit (loss) by business segment, along with a reconciliation of
segment profit (loss) to Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes are shown below (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Heating & Cooling |
|
$ |
413.4 |
|
|
$ |
379.3 |
|
|
$ |
697.6 |
|
|
$ |
625.6 |
|
Commercial Heating & Cooling |
|
|
175.8 |
|
|
|
162.7 |
|
|
|
295.4 |
|
|
|
294.2 |
|
Service Experts |
|
|
167.6 |
|
|
|
147.2 |
|
|
|
294.7 |
|
|
|
251.6 |
|
Refrigeration |
|
|
139.8 |
|
|
|
122.1 |
|
|
|
271.2 |
|
|
|
235.8 |
|
Eliminations (1) |
|
|
(24.5 |
) |
|
|
(27.3 |
) |
|
|
(42.7 |
) |
|
|
(42.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
872.1 |
|
|
$ |
784.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,516.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,364.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Profit (Loss)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Heating & Cooling |
|
$ |
52.5 |
|
|
$ |
39.3 |
|
|
$ |
59.6 |
|
|
$ |
34.5 |
|
Commercial Heating & Cooling |
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
Service Experts |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Refrigeration |
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
|
(32.8 |
) |
|
|
(28.6 |
) |
Eliminations (1) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal that includes segment profit and eliminations |
|
|
88.5 |
|
|
|
62.3 |
|
|
|
96.3 |
|
|
|
44.7 |
|
Reconciliation to income from continuing operations before
income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items in losses (gains) and other expenses, net that are
excluded from segment profit (3) |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
Restructuring charges |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
$ |
76.1 |
|
|
$ |
57.5 |
|
|
$ |
74.1 |
|
|
$ |
29.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Eliminations consist of intercompany sales between business segments, such as products sold to Service
Experts by the Residential Heating & Cooling segment. |
|
(2) |
|
We define segment profit and loss as a segments income or loss from continuing operations before income
taxes included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of
Operations:
Excluding: |
|
o |
|
Special product quality adjustments. |
|
|
o |
|
Items within Losses (Gains) and Other Expenses, net that are noted in (3). |
|
|
o |
|
Restructuring charges. |
|
|
o |
|
Goodwill and equity method investment impairments. |
|
|
o |
|
Interest expense, net. |
|
|
o |
|
Other expense, net. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Items in Losses (Gains) and Other Expenses, net that are excluded from segment profit are net change in
unrealized gains and/or losses on open future contracts, discount fee on accounts sold, realized gains and/or losses on marketable
securities, special legal contingency charge, and other items. |
Total assets by business segment are shown below (in millions). The assets in the
Corporate segment are primarily comprised of cash and deferred tax assets. Assets recorded in the
operating segments represent those assets directly associated with those segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Total Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Heating & Cooling |
|
$ |
629.0 |
|
|
$ |
484.2 |
|
Commercial Heating & Cooling |
|
|
270.6 |
|
|
|
238.5 |
|
Service Experts |
|
|
190.1 |
|
|
|
173.1 |
|
Refrigeration |
|
|
350.5 |
|
|
|
357.5 |
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
243.4 |
|
|
|
297.3 |
|
Eliminations (1) |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,667.2 |
|
|
|
1,540.3 |
|
Discontinued operations (See Note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,667.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,543.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Eliminations consist of net intercompany receivables and intercompany
profit included in inventory from products sold between business
segments, such as products sold to Service Experts by the Residential
Heating & Cooling segment. |
14. Fair Value Measurements:
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for those assets and liabilities
measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions):
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis as of |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
for |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
Total |
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in marketable equity securities (1) |
|
$ |
9.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9.3 |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives, net (2) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis as of |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
for |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
Total |
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in marketable equity securities (1) |
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
Derivatives, net (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Investment in marketable equity securities is recorded in Other Long-term Assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
|
(2) |
|
Liability derivatives are recorded in Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities and asset derivatives are recorded in Other Assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance
Sheets. See Note 4 for more information. |
Other Fair Value Measurements
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, net,
accounts payable and other current liabilities approximate fair value due to the short maturities
of these instruments. The fair values of each of our long-term debt instruments are based on the
quoted market prices for the same issues or on the amount of future cash flows associated with each
instrument using current market rates for debt instruments of similar maturities and credit risk.
The estimated fair value of long-term debt (including our domestic revolving credit facility,
capital lease obligations, foreign obligations and any related current maturities) was $156.2
million and $242.5 million as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The estimated
fair value of our senior unsecured notes was $208.4 as of June 30, 2010. The fair values presented
are estimates and are not necessarily indicative of amounts for which we could settle such
instruments currently or indicative of our intent or ability to dispose of or liquidate them.
15. Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
The Companys senior unsecured notes are unconditionally guaranteed by certain of the
Companys subsidiaries (the Guarantor Subsidiaries) while they are not by other subsidiaries (the
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries). As results of these guarantee arrangements, we are required to
present the following condensed consolidating financial statements.
The condensed consolidating financial statements reflect the investments in subsidiaries of
the Company using the equity method of accounting. Intercompany account balances have been
included in Accounts and Notes Receivable, Other (Current) Assets, Other Assets, net, Short-Term
Debt, Accounts Payable, and Long-Term Debt line items of the Parent, Guarantor and Non-Guarantor
balance sheets. The principal elimination entries eliminate investments in subsidiaries and
intercompany balances and transactions.
Condensed consolidating financial statements of the Company, its Guarantor Subsidiaries and
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are shown below:
22
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
As of June 30, 2010
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
19.3 |
|
|
$ |
41.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
61.9 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable,
net |
|
|
(955.0 |
) |
|
|
771.3 |
|
|
|
645.4 |
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
458.0 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
222.9 |
|
|
|
118.4 |
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
338.4 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
39.1 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
94.3 |
|
|
|
(66.6 |
) |
|
|
48.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
(948.0 |
) |
|
|
1,058.9 |
|
|
|
938.1 |
|
|
|
(79.5 |
) |
|
|
969.5 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT,
net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
205.8 |
|
|
|
112.5 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
318.2 |
|
GOODWILL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.3 |
|
|
|
208.3 |
|
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
253.8 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
65.9 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
(14.0 |
) |
|
|
66.4 |
|
OTHER ASSETS, net |
|
|
1,970.3 |
|
|
|
438.3 |
|
|
|
49.5 |
|
|
|
(2,398.8 |
) |
|
|
59.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
1,019.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,819.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,326.0 |
|
|
$ |
(2,497.2 |
) |
|
$ |
1,667.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
24.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
|
$ |
(24.4 |
) |
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
Current maturities of long-term
debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
186.5 |
|
|
|
130.1 |
|
|
|
(10.1 |
) |
|
|
314.7 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
229.3 |
|
|
|
120.8 |
|
|
|
(43.3 |
) |
|
|
315.4 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
418.4 |
|
|
|
272.4 |
|
|
|
(83.6 |
) |
|
|
643.8 |
|
LONG-TERM DEBT |
|
|
332.0 |
|
|
|
104.2 |
|
|
|
122.6 |
|
|
|
(209.2 |
) |
|
|
349.6 |
|
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS, OTHER
THAN PENSIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
PENSIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59.8 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69.0 |
|
OTHER LIABILITIES |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
49.5 |
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
69.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
373.7 |
|
|
|
645.1 |
|
|
|
433.4 |
|
|
|
(307.6 |
) |
|
|
1,144.6 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
645.5 |
|
|
|
1,174.1 |
|
|
|
892.6 |
|
|
|
(2,189.6 |
) |
|
|
522.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
1,019.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,819.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,326.0 |
|
|
$ |
(2,497.2 |
) |
|
$ |
1,667.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
NET SALES |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
614.3 |
|
|
$ |
329.9 |
|
|
$ |
(72.1 |
) |
|
$ |
872.1 |
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
434.8 |
|
|
|
244.6 |
|
|
|
(72.1 |
) |
|
|
607.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
179.5 |
|
|
|
85.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264.7 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
130.9 |
|
|
|
49.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180.5 |
|
Losses (gains) and
other expenses, net |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
3.2 |
|
Loss (income) from
equity method
investments |
|
|
(56.0 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
62.4 |
|
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational
income (loss)
from continuing
operations |
|
|
54.3 |
|
|
|
49.2 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
|
|
|
(62.4 |
) |
|
|
79.3 |
|
INTEREST EXPENSE, net |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss)
from continuing
operations
before income
taxes |
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
47.3 |
|
|
|
37.2 |
|
|
|
(62.4 |
) |
|
|
76.1 |
|
(BENEFIT FROM)
PROVISIONS FOR INCOME
TAXES |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss)
from continuing
operations |
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
|
(62.5 |
) |
|
|
48.7 |
|
Loss from discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
54.8 |
|
|
$ |
32.2 |
|
|
$ |
23.8 |
|
|
$ |
(62.5 |
) |
|
$ |
48.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
NET SALES |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,043.7 |
|
|
$ |
604.1 |
|
|
$ |
(131.6 |
) |
|
$ |
1,516.2 |
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
757.5 |
|
|
|
451.1 |
|
|
|
(131.6 |
) |
|
|
1,077.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
286.2 |
|
|
|
153.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439.1 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
247.3 |
|
|
|
102.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
349.6 |
|
Losses (gains) and
other expenses, net |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
10.3 |
|
(Income) loss from
equity method
investments |
|
|
(51.2 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
54.7 |
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational
income (loss)
from continuing
operations |
|
|
49.7 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
|
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
(54.8 |
) |
|
|
79.8 |
|
INTEREST EXPENSE, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss)
from continuing
operations
before income
taxes |
|
|
49.7 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
48.3 |
|
|
|
(54.8 |
) |
|
|
74.1 |
|
(BENEFIT FROM)
PROVISIONS FOR INCOME
TAXES |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss)
from continuing
operations |
|
|
50.3 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
(54.9 |
) |
|
|
47.4 |
|
Loss from discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
50.3 |
|
|
$ |
20.8 |
|
|
$ |
30.5 |
|
|
$ |
(54.9 |
) |
|
$ |
46.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
As of December 31, 2009
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
116.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
124.3 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable,
net |
|
|
(975.0 |
) |
|
|
775.1 |
|
|
|
558.3 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
357.0 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
139.4 |
|
|
|
113.7 |
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
250.2 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
34.9 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
93.0 |
|
|
|
(56.8 |
) |
|
|
67.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
(962.0 |
) |
|
|
965.6 |
|
|
|
897.7 |
|
|
|
(67.4 |
) |
|
|
833.9 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT,
net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
207.8 |
|
|
|
121.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329.6 |
|
GOODWILL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
215.4 |
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
257.4 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67.3 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
74.6 |
|
OTHER ASSETS, net |
|
|
1,905.1 |
|
|
|
371.4 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
(2,269.6 |
) |
|
|
48.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
943.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,658.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,297.6 |
|
|
$ |
(2,355.6 |
) |
|
$ |
1,543.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
25.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
(25.4 |
) |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
Current maturities of long-term
debt |
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
115.4 |
|
|
|
122.7 |
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
238.2 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
192.5 |
|
|
|
154.3 |
|
|
|
(34.0 |
) |
|
|
317.9 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(17.5 |
) |
|
|
(21.6 |
) |
|
|
43.2 |
|
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
55.6 |
|
|
|
286.3 |
|
|
|
323.2 |
|
|
|
(71.3 |
) |
|
|
593.8 |
|
LONG-TERM DEBT |
|
|
176.5 |
|
|
|
98.8 |
|
|
|
117.4 |
|
|
|
(198.9 |
) |
|
|
193.8 |
|
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS, OTHER
THAN PENSIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
PENSIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
56.3 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
66.7 |
|
OTHER LIABILITIES |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
50.9 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
|
(14.6 |
) |
|
|
71.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
234.7 |
|
|
|
505.7 |
|
|
|
484.0 |
|
|
|
(284.9 |
) |
|
|
939.5 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
708.4 |
|
|
|
1,153.1 |
|
|
|
813.6 |
|
|
|
(2,070.7 |
) |
|
|
604.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
943.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,658.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,297.6 |
|
|
$ |
(2,355.6 |
) |
|
$ |
1,543.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
NET SALES |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
563.7 |
|
|
$ |
286.0 |
|
|
$ |
(65.7 |
) |
|
$ |
784.0 |
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
403.6 |
|
|
|
218.2 |
|
|
|
(65.4 |
) |
|
|
556.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
160.1 |
|
|
|
67.8 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
227.5 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
117.0 |
|
|
|
47.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164.3 |
|
(Gains) losses and
other expenses, net |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
(Income) loss from
equity method
investments |
|
|
(30.3 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational
income (loss)
from continuing
operations |
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
|
40.8 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
(30.3 |
) |
|
|
59.6 |
|
INTEREST (INCOME) EXPENSE, net |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss)
from continuing
operations
before income
taxes |
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
(30.4 |
) |
|
|
57.5 |
|
PROVISIONS FOR INCOME
TAXES |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss)
from continuing
operations |
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
(30.4 |
) |
|
|
35.9 |
|
Loss from discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
31.7 |
|
|
$ |
24.1 |
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
$ |
(30.4 |
) |
|
$ |
31.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
NET SALES |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
963.4 |
|
|
$ |
517.8 |
|
|
$ |
(116.7 |
) |
|
$ |
1,364.5 |
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
713.0 |
|
|
|
402.9 |
|
|
|
(116.7 |
) |
|
|
999.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
250.4 |
|
|
|
114.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
365.2 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
228.3 |
|
|
|
91.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
319.3 |
|
(Gains) losses and
other expenses, net |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
(Income) loss from
equity method
investments |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational
income from
continuing
operations |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
INTEREST (INCOME) EXPENSE, net |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss)
from continuing
operations
before income
taxes |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
|
PROVISIONS FOR INCOME
TAXES |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss)
from continuing
operations |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
Loss from discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
(4.8 |
) |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
10.0 |
|
|
$ |
13.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities |
|
$ |
26.9 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
(55.6 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(26.0 |
) |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the disposal of
property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Purchases of property, plant
and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.7 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19.7 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Acquisition of business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in
investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22.0 |
) |
|
|
(25.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47.3 |
) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Long-term payments |
|
|
(35.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35.3 |
) |
Issuance of senior unsecured
notes |
|
|
199.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199.8 |
|
Revolver long-term borrowings,
net |
|
|
(44.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44.5 |
) |
Proceeds from stock option
exercises |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Payments of deferred financing
costs |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(99.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99.5 |
) |
Excess tax benefits related to
share-based payments |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Intercompany debt |
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany financing activity |
|
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany investments |
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany dividends |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(16.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in)
provided by financing
activities |
|
|
(26.4 |
) |
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
(75.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62.5 |
) |
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
beginning of year |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
116.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end
of year |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
19.3 |
|
|
$ |
41.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
61.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities |
|
$ |
60.9 |
|
|
$ |
(2.9 |
) |
|
$ |
24.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
82.7 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the disposal of
property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Purchases of property, plant
and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.6 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Return on investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Purchases of short-term
investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.0 |
) |
Proceeds from sales and
maturities of short-term
investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in
investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.6 |
) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Long-term payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
Revolver long-term payments, net |
|
|
(100.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100.8 |
) |
Proceeds from stock option
exercises |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
Excess tax benefits related to
share-based payments |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Intercompany debt |
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(23.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany financing activity |
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
(64.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany dividends |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in)
provided by financing
activities |
|
|
(60.4 |
) |
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
|
(92.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117.1 |
) |
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
(71.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55.0 |
) |
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
119.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end
of year |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
18.6 |
|
|
$ |
46.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
65.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, that are based on information currently available to management as well as
managements assumptions and beliefs. All statements, other than statements of historical fact,
included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including but not limited to
statements identified by the words may, will, should, plan, predict, anticipate,
believe, intend, estimate and expect and similar expressions. Such statements reflect our
current views with respect to future events, based on what we believe are reasonable assumptions;
however, such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. In addition to the
specific uncertainties discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the risk factors
set forth in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009, and those set forth in Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors of this report, if any,
may affect our performance and results of operations. Should one or more of these risks or
uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may
differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. We disclaim any intention or
obligation to update or review any forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise.
Overview
We operate in four reportable business segments of the heating, ventilation, air conditioning
and refrigeration, (HVACR) industry. Our reportable segments are Residential Heating & Cooling,
Commercial Heating & Cooling, Service Experts and Refrigeration. For more detailed information
regarding our reportable segments, see Note 13 in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Our products and services are sold through a combination of distributors, independent and
company-owned dealer service centers, other installing contractors, wholesalers, manufacturers
representatives, original equipment manufacturers and to national accounts. The demand for our
products and services is seasonal and dependent on the weather. Warmer than normal summer
temperatures generate strong demand for replacement air conditioning and refrigeration products and
services and colder than normal winter temperatures have the same effect on heating products and
services. Conversely, cooler than normal summers and warmer than normal winters depress HVACR
sales and services. In addition to weather, demand for our products and services is influenced by
national and regional economic and demographic factors, such as interest rates, the availability of
financing, regional population and employment trends, new construction, general economic conditions
and consumer spending habits and confidence. A substantial portion of the sales in each of our
business segments is attributable to replacement business, with the balance comprised of new
construction business.
The principal elements of cost of goods sold in our manufacturing operations are components,
raw materials, factory overhead, labor and estimated costs of warranty expense. In our Service
Experts segment, the principal components of cost of goods sold are equipment, parts and supplies
and labor. The principal raw materials used in our manufacturing processes are steel, copper and
aluminum. In recent years, the volatility of commodity prices and related components has impacted
us and the HVACR industry in general. We partially mitigate the impact of higher commodity prices
through a combination of price increases, commodity contracts, improved production efficiency and
cost reduction initiatives. We also partially mitigate volatility in the prices of these
commodities by entering into futures contracts and fixed forward contracts.
Our fiscal year ends on December 31 and our interim fiscal quarters are each comprised of 13
weeks. For convenience, throughout this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, the 13-week periods comprising each fiscal quarter are denoted
by the last day of the calendar quarter.
The second quarter of each fiscal year is the beginning of the summer and our most profitable
season. End markets in the Residential Heating & Cooling and Service Experts businesses continued
to show stronger growth for the second quarter of 2010 as compared to the second quarter of 2009
and sales improved in our Commercial Heating & Cooling and Refrigeration businesses as compared to
the second quarter of 2009. While our end markets continue to recover, we remain cautious
regarding overall economic conditions in the near term.
We will continue to execute on our strategic priorities to win new business and capture
opportunities
through innovative product and system solutions and lower our cost structure through
manufacturing and
31
sourcing excellence and expense reduction efforts. We believe that our results
will continue to benefit from the recovery of the residential new construction end market,
worldwide sourcing savings and restructuring savings. Commodity costs and incentive compensation
will put pressure on our earnings. We believe that as end markets recover, we are well-positioned
to drive increased earnings leverage.
Company Highlights
|
|
|
Net sales for the second quarter of 2010 were $872.1 million, compared to $784.0 million
in 2009 and were favorably impacted by higher volumes across all segments. |
|
|
|
|
Operational income from continuing operations for the second quarter of 2010 was $79.3
million compared to $59.6 million for the second quarter of 2009. The improvement to
operational income was primarily due to higher sales volumes, lower material costs and
savings from productivity initiatives. |
|
|
|
|
Net income for the second quarter of 2010 was $48.3 million compared to $31.7 million in
the same period in 2009. Diluted earnings per share was $0.86 per share in the second
quarter 2010 compared to $0.56 per share in the second quarter of 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Cash of $26.0 million was used in operating activities for first half of 2010 compared
to cash provided by operating activities of $82.7 million in the first half of 2009. Cash
provided by operating activities was lower primarily due to increased working capital
requirements including the increased build of inventory levels in the first half of 2010 in
order to support increased production volumes for the peak sales season and new product
introductions. Also, first half of 2009 cash flows from operating activities were
favorably impacted by the return of $37.4 million of collateral posted related to commodity
hedges. |
|
|
|
|
During the first half of 2010, we returned $94.4 million to shareholders through share
repurchases. |
Results of Operations
The following table presents certain information concerning our financial results, including
information presented as a percentage of net sales (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Percent |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
872.1 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
784.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,516.2 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,364.5 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
607.4 |
|
|
|
69.6 |
|
|
|
556.5 |
|
|
|
71.0 |
|
|
|
1,077.1 |
|
|
|
71.0 |
|
|
|
999.3 |
|
|
|
73.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
264.7 |
|
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
227.5 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
439.1 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
365.2 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
Selling, general
and administrative
expenses |
|
|
180.5 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
164.3 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
349.6 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
319.3 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
Losses (Gains) and
other expenses, net |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
charges |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Income from equity
method investments |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational
income |
|
$ |
79.3 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
$ |
59.6 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
$ |
79.8 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
$ |
33.4 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
48.3 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
$ |
31.7 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
46.7 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
$ |
13.6 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter of 2010 Compared to Second Quarter of 2009 Consolidated Results
Net Sales
Net sales increased 11.2% for the second quarter of 2010 as compared to 2009 primarily due to
increased sales volumes of 10% driven by strength across all four business segments. These
increases in net sales were partially offset by lower price and mix of approximately 1%. Changes in
foreign currency exchange rates favorably impacted net sales by 1%.
32
Gross Profit
Gross profit margins improved approximately 140 basis points to 30.4% for the second quarter
of 2010, compared to gross profit margins of 29.0% in 2009. This improvement was primarily driven
by lower product costs from material savings and manufacturing efficiencies of approximately 210
basis points. Partially offsetting these positive impacts to gross profit margins was a less
favorable comparison related to the net incremental effect of warranty adjustments of approximately
50 basis points. Other items and changes in foreign currency exchange rates also had an
approximate 20 basis point negative impact on our gross profit margins.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses increased by $16.2 million in the second
quarter of 2010 as compared to 2009 and as a percentage of total net sales, SG&A expenses were
20.7% for 2010 and 21.0% for 2009. SG&A expenses increased $8 million primarily due to increased
variable incentive compensation driven by improved financial performance, and costs associated with
new product launches and increased variable selling expenses of $7 million in support of our sales
growth.
Losses and Other Expenses, Net
Losses and other expenses, net for the second quarters of 2010 and 2009 included the
following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Realized (gains) losses on settled futures contracts |
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
Unrealized losses (gains) on unsettled futures contracts |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
Special legal contingency charge |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange losses |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Other items, net |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and other expenses, net |
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in gains and losses on futures contracts was primarily due to increases in
commodity prices relative to the futures contract prices during 2010 as compared to 2009 for the
contracts that settled during the quarter. Conversely, the change in unrealized losses (gains)
related to unsettled futures contracts not designated as cash flow hedges was primarily due to
lower commodity prices relative to the futures contract prices for those contracts. For more
information, see Note 4 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For more
information regarding the special legal contingency charge, see Note 6 in the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Restructuring Charges
We anticipate incurring approximately $4.8 million of future restructuring charges relating to
projects that were in process during the second quarter of 2010. Of that amount, about $0.5
million are anticipated to be non-cash charges for accelerated depreciation. Future cash outlays
for restructuring activities that are currently in progress are estimated to be $14.8 million.
These restructuring charges and cash outlays are expected to be incurred generally within the next
two years.
Total cash paid for restructuring activities during the first half of 2010 was $18.2 million,
an increase of $10.5 million from the same period in 2009. A significant portion of this amount
related to an increase in restructuring activities related to manufacturing rationalization and was
primarily composed of severance payments related to our various restructuring projects. We use
operating cash as the funding source for restructuring activities.
We expect to realize $15 million of incremental expense savings for the 2010.
For a detail discussion regarding restructuring activities for the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2010, see Note 10 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
33
Income from Equity Method Investments
Investments over which we do not exercise control but have significant influence are accounted
for using the equity method of accounting. Income from equity method investments increased to $4.1
million in the second quarter of 2010 compared to $1.8 million during the same period in 2009
primarily due to the improved performance of our U.S. joint venture in compressor manufacturing,
which experienced increased sales and profitability.
Interest Expense, net
Interest expense, net, increased to $3.1 million in the second quarter of 2010 from $2.0
million during the same period in 2009. The increase in interest expense was primarily
attributable to an increase in the interest rate paid, including the effects of our interest rate
swap, on variable rate debt and the issuance of $200 million of our senior unsecured notes at
4.91%.
Income Taxes
The income tax provision was $27.4 million in the second quarter of 2010 compared to $21.6
million during the same period in 2009. The effective tax rate was 36.0% for the second quarter of
2010 as compared to 37.6% for the same period in 2009. Our effective rates differ from the
statutory federal rate of 35% for certain items, such as state and local taxes, non-deductible
expenses, foreign operating losses for which no tax benefits have been recognized and foreign taxes
at rates other than 35%.
Discontinued Operations
Near the end of 2008, we announced plans to sell seven unprofitable service centers. We sold
all of these service centers during 2009. Also, during the third quarter of 2009, we announced
plans to sell an additional five service centers. We have sold all of these service centers as of
the end of the first quarter of 2010.
We have recorded an operational loss of $0.4 million related to these service centers in
second quarter of 2010 as discontinued operations as compared to an operational loss of $6.8
million during the same period of 2009. The operational loss from discontinued operations for the
second quarter of 2010 was composed of a loss on disposal of service center assets and liabilities.
The loss from discontinued operations for the second quarter of 2009 included a provision of $6.2
million for an unfavorable judgment in litigation related to the sale of a service center in 2004
that was included in discontinued operations.
Second Quarter of 2010 Compared to Second Quarter of 2009 Results by Segment
Residential Heating & Cooling
The following table details our Residential Heating & Cooling segments net sales and profit
for the second quarters of 2010 and 2009 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Difference |
|
% Change |
Net sales |
|
$ |
413.4 |
|
|
$ |
379.3 |
|
|
$ |
34.1 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
Profit |
|
|
52.5 |
|
|
|
39.3 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
33.6 |
|
% of net sales |
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in sales was due to the growth of the U.S. residential new construction and
replacement markets. Sales volumes increased net sales by nearly 10% in 2010 as compared to 2009.
The positive impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates also increased sales by 1%.
These increases in sales were partially offset by lower price and mix of 2% due to the mix of
indoor coils and air handlers and the effects of consumers buying
minimum efficiency products that qualify for energy-efficiency tax credits.
Segment profit increased $13.2 million, including $8 million due to the increase in net sales
and $12 million due to material savings and manufacturing efficiencies. Comparisons were adversely
affected by a less favorable warranty adjustment in 2010 versus the prior year of $4 million.
These were partially offset by higher SG&A expenses of $3 million and consisted primarily of
increased advertising associated with new product introductions.
34
Commercial Heating & Cooling
The following table details our Commercial Heating & Cooling segments net sales and profit
for the second quarters of 2010 and 2009 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Difference |
|
% Change |
Net sales |
|
$ |
175.8 |
|
|
$ |
162.7 |
|
|
$ |
13.1 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
% |
Profit |
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
44.0 |
|
% of net sales |
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Commercial Heating & Cooling business experienced higher sales volumes of almost 7% in the
second quarter of 2010 as compared to 2009 primarily due to introductions of energy efficient
products and planned replacement business at national retail accounts. Price and mix also were
favorable by 2%. Foreign currency exchange rates decreased net sales by 1%.
Segment profit increased $8.5 million, including $7 million due to the increase in net sales.
Reductions in other product costs of $2 million favorably impacted segment profit as non-commodity
material cost savings were partially offset by higher freight and distribution costs. SG&A expenses
increased by just under $1 million for the second quarter 2010 as compared to 2009 as higher variable
selling expenses and new product introduction costs more than offset headcount savings.
Service Experts
The following table details our Service Experts segments net sales and profit for the second
quarters of 2010 and 2009 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Difference |
|
% Change |
Net sales |
|
$ |
167.6 |
|
|
$ |
147.2 |
|
|
$ |
20.4 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
% |
Profit |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
45.5 |
|
% of net sales |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales increased primarily due to the improvements in the residential service
replacement and commercial end markets. The sales increase was primarily due to an increase in
sales volumes of 7%. Price and mix increased by 5%. Foreign currency exchange rates increased net
sales by 2%.
Segment profit increased $4 million primarily due to the increase in net sales.
Refrigeration
The following table details our Refrigeration segments net sales and profit for the second
quarters of 2010 and 2009 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Difference |
|
% Change |
Net sales |
|
$ |
139.8 |
|
|
$ |
122.1 |
|
|
$ |
17.7 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
% |
Profit |
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
59.4 |
|
% of net sales |
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales increased due to higher sales volumes of about 9% and the favorable impact of
changes in foreign currency exchange rates of 4%. Price and mix also increased sales by
approximately 2%.
Segment profit increased $5.7 million, including $5 million due to the increase in net sales
and $1 million in improved material savings and manufacturing efficiencies which more than offset
commodity price pressures. Offsetting these increases to segment profit were increases in SG&A
expenses of $1 million.
35
Corporate and Other
Corporate and other expenses were $19.6 million in the second quarter of 2010, up from
$14.7 million in 2009. The increase was primarily driven by increases in stock-based and incentive
compensation expenses of approximately $5 million that resulted from improved financial
performance.
Year-to-Date Through June 30, 2010 Compared to Year-to-Date Through June 30, 2009 Consolidated
Results
Net Sales
Net sales increased 11.1% for the first half of 2010 as compared to 2009 due to increased
sales volumes of almost 9% primarily driven by strength in the Residential Heating & Cooling and
Service Experts segments. The Refrigeration segment also showed growth as compared to a year ago.
Sales volumes in Commercial Heating & Cooling segment were slightly lower in the first half of 2010
as compared to 2009, due to market pressures in the first quarter of 2010, which were substantially
offset with strong growth in the second quarter of 2010. These increases in net sales were
partially offset by lower price and mix of approximately 1%. Changes in foreign currency exchange
rates favorably impacted net sales by 3%.
Gross Profit
Gross profit margins improved approximately 220 basis points to 29.0% for the first half of
2010, compared to gross profit margins of 26.8% in 2009. This improvement was primarily driven by
lower product costs from material savings and manufacturing efficiencies of approximately 295 basis
points. Partially offsetting these positive impacts to gross profit margins was price and mix in
the Residential Heating & Cooling segment that decreased gross profit margins by approximately 50
basis points and an unfavorable comparison related to the net incremental effect of warranty
adjustments of approximately 25 basis points.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
As a percentage of total net sales, SG&A expenses were 23.1% for 2010 and 23.4% for 2009.
SG&A expenses for the first half increased by $30.3 million in 2010 as compared to the same period
in 2009. Selling and administrative expenses increased generally due to increased incentive
compensation of $13 million driven by increased sales and improved financial performance, and
increased advertising associated with new product introductions and increased variable selling
expenses of $12 million in support of our sales growth. The impact of changes in foreign exchange
rates increased SG&A expenses by $10 million. Partially offsetting these increases were cost
reductions, including headcount savings, of $5 million.
Losses (Gains) and Other Expenses, Net
Losses (gains) and other expenses, net for the first half of 2010 and 2009 included the
following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Realized (gains) losses on settled futures contracts |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
Unrealized losses (gains) on unsettled futures contracts |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
Special legal contingency charge |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Other items, net |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses (gains) and other expenses, net |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in gains and losses on futures contracts was primarily due to increases in
commodity prices relative to the futures contract prices during 2010 as compared to 2009 for the
contracts that settled during the period. Conversely, the change in unrealized losses (gains)
related to unsettled futures contracts not designated as cash flow hedges was primarily due to
lower commodity prices relative to the futures contract prices for those contracts. For more
information, see Note 4 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For more
information regarding the special legal contingency charge, see Note 6 in the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
36
Income from Equity Method Investments
Investments over which we do not exercise control but have significant influence are accounted
for using the equity method of accounting. Income from equity method investments increased to $6.1
million in the first half of 2010 compared to $3.2 million during the same period in 2009 primarily
due primarily due to the improved performance of our U.S. joint venture in compressor
manufacturing, which experienced increased sales and profitability.
Interest Expense, net
Interest expense, net increased to $5.6 million during the first half of 2010 from $3.9
million during the same period in 2009. The increase in interest expense was primarily
attributable to an increase in the interest rate paid, including the effects of our interest rate
swap, on variable rate debt and the issuance of $200 million of our senior unsecured notes at
4.91%.
Income Taxes
The income tax provision was $26.7 million in the first half of 2010 compared to $11.2 million
during the same period in 2009. The effective tax rate was 36.0% for the first half of 2010 as
compared to 38.1% for the same period in 2009. Our effective rates differ from the statutory
federal rate of 35% for certain items, such as state and local taxes, non-deductible expenses,
foreign operating losses for which no tax benefits have been recognized and foreign taxes at rates
other than 35%.
Discontinued Operations
Included in the operational loss from discontinued operations are losses on the disposal of
the assets and liabilities of the service centers sold of $0.3 million for the first half of 2010,
and gains on disposal of the assets and liabilities of service centers sold of $1.0 million for the
first half of 2009. The loss from discontinued operations for the first half of 2009 included a
provision of $6.2 million for an unfavorable judgment in litigation related to the sale of a
service center in 2004 that was included in discontinued operations.
Year-to-Date Through June 30, 2010 Compared to Year-to-Date Through June 30, 2009 Results by
Segment
Residential Heating & Cooling
The following table details our Residential Heating & Cooling segments net sales and profit
for the first half of 2010 and 2009 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Difference |
|
% Change |
Net sales |
|
$ |
697.6 |
|
|
$ |
625.6 |
|
|
$ |
72.0 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
Profit |
|
|
59.6 |
|
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
72.8 |
|
% of net sales |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in sales was due to the growth of the U.S. residential new construction and
replacement markets. Sales volumes increased net sales by over 12% in 2010 as compared to 2009.
The positive impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates also increased sales by almost
2%. These increases in sales were partially offset by lower price and mix of almost 3%.
Segment profit increased $25.1 million, including almost $21 million due to material savings
and
manufacturing efficiencies and nearly $9 million due to the increase in net sales. These were
partially offset by higher SG&A expenses of $8 million and consisted primarily of increased
advertising expenses and incentive compensation.
Commercial Heating & Cooling
The following table details our Commercial Heating & Cooling segments net sales and profit
for the first half of 2010 and 2009 (dollars in millions):
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Difference |
|
% Change |
Net sales |
|
$ |
295.4 |
|
|
$ |
294.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Profit |
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
46.9 |
|
% of net sales |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Commercial Heating & Cooling business experienced lower sales volumes of 1% during the
first half of 2010 primarily due to overall market weakness experience during the first half of
2010. Price and mix were favorable by 1%. Foreign currency exchange
rates increased net sales by
1%.
Segment profit increased $10.0 million, including nearly $4 million due to the increase in net
sales and $4 million due to material savings and other cost adjustments.
Service Experts
The following table details our Service Experts segments net sales and profit for the first
half of 2010 and 2009 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Difference |
|
% Change |
Net sales |
|
$ |
294.7 |
|
|
$ |
251.6 |
|
|
$ |
43.1 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
% |
Profit |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
382.4 |
|
% of net sales |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales increased primarily due to the significant improvements in the residential service
and replacement end markets. The sales increase was primarily due to an increase in sales volumes
of 11%. Price and mix increased sales by 3%. Foreign currency exchange rates increased sales by
3%.
Segment profit increased $6.5 million, including nearly $9 million due to the increase in net
sales. Offsetting this was an SG&A expense increase of $3 million as higher variable selling
expenses more than offset headcount savings.
Refrigeration
The following table details our Refrigeration segments net sales and profit for the first
half of 2010 and 2009 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Difference |
|
% Change |
Net sales |
|
$ |
271.2 |
|
|
$ |
235.8 |
|
|
$ |
35.4 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
% |
Profit |
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
87.6 |
|
% of net sales |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales increased due to higher sales volumes of about 4% and the favorable impact of
changes in foreign currency exchange rates of over 9%. Price and mix also increased sales by
approximately 2%.
Segment profit increased $14.1 million, including $8 million due to the increase in net sales
and almost $6 million in improved material savings and manufacturing efficiencies as those factors
more than offset
commodity price pressures.
Corporate and Other
Corporate
and other expenses were $32.8 million in the first half of 2010, up from
$28.6 million during the same period in 2009. The increase was primarily driven by increases in
stock-based and incentive compensation expenses of approximately $8 million partially offset by the
improved financial performance of our U.S. joint venture.
38
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our working capital and capital expenditure requirements are generally met through internally
generated funds, our domestic revolving credit facility and our revolving period asset
securitization arrangement. Working capital needs are generally greater in the first and second
quarters due to the seasonal nature of our business cycle.
Statement of Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash activity for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
(26.0 |
) |
|
$ |
82.7 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(47.3 |
) |
|
|
(20.6 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
(117.1 |
) |
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Operating Activities
The cash usage experienced during the first two quarters of 2010 in operating activities was
primarily due to increased working capital requirements related to higher revenues. Accounts
receivable increased by $115.4 million during the first six months of 2010, compared to an increase
of $60.5 million a year ago, reflecting higher sales. In addition, inventories increased during
the period by $107.8 million, compared to a decrease of $23.4 million for the same period in 2009.
These impacts were partially offset by higher earnings for the first six months of 2010 of $46.7
million versus $13.6 million in 2009 and higher accounts payable of $81.7 million versus 27.1
million for the first six months of 2009.
There were several other factors that impacted the year-over-year comparisons of our cash
flows from operations during the first half of 2010 and 2009. In 2009, we had $37.4 million source
of cash from the return of collateral posted for hedge losses, In addition, net income taxes
payable increased by $14.3 million in 2010 compared to a decrease of $13.6 million for the same
period in 2009.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
Capital expenditures in the first two quarters of 2010 were $19.7 million, which was slightly
less than the $21.6 million incurred in the first two quarters of 2009. Capital expenditures for
the first two quarters of 2010 were principally driven by:
|
|
|
Purchases of production equipment in our Residential Heating & Cooling and Commercial
Heating & Cooling segments, and |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of systems and software to support our regional distribution center
initiative as well as the overall enterprise. |
Other factors impacting net cash from investing activities for the first six months of 2010
included $23.8 million of restricted cash representing amounts placed into a trust by our captive
insurance subsidiary for the benefit of a third-party insurance provider to pay workers
compensation claims, and net use for acquisitions of $7.4 million offset by sale of businesses of
$3.5 million.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
To support working capital needs and share repurchases, we had net borrowings of $124.2
million during the
first six months of 2010 as compared to a net reduction of $101.0 million for the same period
in 2009, driven largely by working capital requirements. We also repurchased common shares of
$94.5 million in the first six months of 2010 under the current share repurchase program. We paid
a total of $16.2 million and $15.5 million in dividends on our common stock in the first six months
of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
39
Debt Position and Financial Leverage
Our debt-to-capital ratio increased to 41% as of June 30, 2010 from 28% as of December 31,
2009 due to increased debt balances. For a detailed description regarding our debt including our debt covenants, see Note 7 in
the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
As of June 30, 2010, we had outstanding borrowings of $132.0 million under the $650.0 million
domestic revolving credit facility and $72.0 million was committed to standby letters of credit.
All of the remaining $446.0 million was available for future borrowings after consideration of
covenant limitations. The facility matures in October 2012. As of June 30, 2010, we were in
compliance with all covenant requirements. Our domestic revolving credit facility is guaranteed by
our material subsidiaries.
We have additional borrowing capacity through several foreign facilities governed by
agreements between us and various banks. These borrowings are used primarily to finance seasonal
borrowing needs of our foreign subsidiaries. We had $6.1 million and $2.5 million of obligations
outstanding through our foreign subsidiaries as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. Available borrowing capacity at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, on foreign
facilities was $11.9 million and $12.6 million, respectively.
The domestic revolving credit facility includes a subfacility for swingline loans of up to $50
million and provides for the issuance of letters of credit for the full amount of the credit
facility. Our weighted average borrowing rate on the facility was 0.95% and 0.84% as of June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
On May 6, 2010, we issued $200.0 million of senior unsecured notes due May 15, 2017 bearing
fixed interest at 4.90% as a result of a public offering of securities. The purpose of the debt
issuance was to extend our debt maturities and diversify our funding sources. Additionally, we
were able to take advantage of liquid capital markets and historically low interest rates.
The proceeds from the issuance were used to repay outstanding indebtedness under our domestic
revolving credit facility. They will also be used for working capital and other general corporate
purposes, including repurchases of shares of our common stock pursuant to our previously announced
share repurchase plans.
Upon a change of control, holders of our notes will have the right to require us to repurchase
all or a portion of the senior unsecured notes at a repurchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the notes repurchased,
plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
The indenture also contains a
cross default provision which is triggered if we default on other debt of at least $75 million in
principal which is then accelerated, and such acceleration is not rescinded within 30 days of the
notice date.
Under a revolving period asset securitization arrangement (ASA), we are eligible to transfer
beneficial interests in a portion of our trade accounts receivable to third parties in exchange for
cash. Our continued involvement in the transferred assets includes servicing, collection and
administration of the transferred beneficial interests. The sale of the beneficial interests in our
trade accounts receivable are reflected as secured borrowings. The fair values assigned to the
retained and transferred interests are based primarily on the receivables carrying value given the
short term to maturity and low credit risk. The ASA provides for a maximum securitization amount of
$100 million or 100% of the net pool balance as defined by the ASA. However, eligibility for
securitization is limited based on the amount and quality of the qualifying accounts receivable and
is calculated monthly. The beneficial interest sold cannot exceed the maximum amount even if our
qualifying accounts receivable is greater than the maximum amount at any point in time. The
eligible amounts available and beneficial interests sold were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Eligible amount available under the ASA on
qualified accounts receivable |
|
$ |
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
72.5 |
|
Beneficial interest sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining amount available |
|
$ |
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
72.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010, $23.8 million of cash and cash equivalents were restricted and held in a
trust for our captive insurance subsidiary. By placing these funds in the trust, we reduced the
requirement for letters of credit related to our captive insurance subsidiary by approximately $25
million subsequent to the end of the first quarter of 2010.
We periodically review our capital structure, including our primary bank facility, to ensure
that it has adequate liquidity. We believe that cash flows from operations, as well as available
borrowings under our revolving credit facility and other existing sources of funding, will be
sufficient to fund our operations for the foreseeable future and share repurchases under the terms
of our 2008 Share Repurchase Plan.
40
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In addition to the credit facilities and senior unsecured notes described above, we also lease
real estate and machinery and equipment pursuant to operating leases that are not capitalized on
the balance sheet, including high-turnover equipment such as autos and service vehicles and
short-lived equipment such as personal computers.
Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees
For a detailed discussion of commitments, contingencies and guarantees, see Note 6 in the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The estimate of our liability for future warranty costs requires us to make
significant assumptions about the amount, timing and nature of the costs we will incur in the
future. We review the assumptions used to determine the liability periodically and we adjust our
assumptions based upon factors such as actual failure rates and cost experience. Numerous factors
could affect actual failure rates and cost experience, including the amount and timing of new
product introductions, changes in manufacturing techniques or locations, components or suppliers
used. In recent years, changes in the warranty liability as the result of the issuance of new
warranties and the payments made have remained relatively stable. Should actual warranty costs
differ from our estimates, we may be required to record adjustments to accruals and expense in the
future. At the end of each accounting period, we evaluate our warranty liabilities and during the
second quarter of each year, we perform a complete reevaluation of our warranty liabilities. As a
result of our annual evaluation, we have recorded a reduction to the warranty liability that is the
principal amount contained within changes in estimates associated with pre-existing liabilities of
$6.3 million. The reduction to our warranty liabilities was principally caused by lower than
expected failure rates, reductions to future cost estimates, and new experience data.
We also may incur costs related to our products that may not be covered under our warranties
and are not covered by insurance, and we may, from time to time, repair or replace installed
products experiencing quality issues in order to satisfy our customers and to protect our brand.
These product quality issues may be caused by vendor-supplied components that fail to meet required
specifications. We have identified a product quality issue in a heating and cooling product line
produced in 2006 and 2007 period that we believe results from a vendor-supplied materials quality
issue. In 2009, we recorded an expense of $24.6 million for the portion of the issue that is
probable and can be reasonably estimated based upon the current data available and $18.9 million
remained accrued as of June 30, 2010. We may incur additional charges in the future as more
information becomes available.
We estimate the costs to settle pending litigation based on experience involving similar
claims and specific facts known. We do not believe that any current or pending or threatened
litigation with have a material adverse effect on our financial position. Litigation and
arbitration, however, involve uncertainties and it is possible that the eventual outcome of
litigation could adversely affect our results of operations for a particular period. We are the
defendant in a class action lawsuit related to certain hearth products we produced and sold that
claims such products are hazardous and that consumers were not adequately warned. We recorded
charges totaling $5.6 million related to this matter during the second quarter of 2010 and we may
incur additional charges in the future.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
Commodity Price Risk
We enter into commodity futures contracts to stabilize prices expected to be paid for raw
materials and parts containing high copper and aluminum content. These contracts are for quantities
equal to or less than quantities expected to be consumed in future production.
Fluctuations in metal commodity prices impact the value of the derivative instruments that we
hold. When metal commodity prices rise, the fair value of our futures contracts increases and
conversely, when commodity prices fall, the fair value of our futures contracts decreases.
Information about our exposure to market risks related to metal commodity prices and a
sensitivity analysis related to our metal commodity hedges is presented below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount (pounds) |
|
|
23.0 |
|
Carrying amount and fair value of liability |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
Change in fair value from 10% change in forward prices |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
41
Interest Rate Risk
Our results of operations can be affected by changes in interest rates due to variable rates
of interest on our revolving credit facilities, cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments.
In order to partially mitigate interest rate risk, we use a hedging strategy to eliminate the
variability of cash flows in the interest payments for the first $100 million of the total
variable-rate debt outstanding under the domestic revolving credit facility that is solely due to
changes in the benchmark interest rate. This strategy allows us to fix a portion of our interest
payments while also taking advantage of historically low interest rates.
On June 12, 2009, we entered into a $100 million pay-fixed, receive-variable interest rate
swap with a large financial institution at a fixed interest rate of 2.66%. The variable portion of
the interest rate swap is tied to 1-Month LIBOR (the benchmark interest rate). The interest rates
under both the interest rate swap and the underlying debt are reset, the swap is settled with the
counterparty, and interest is paid, on a monthly basis. The interest rate swap expires October 12,
2012. We account for the interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge.
Information about our exposure to interest rate risk and a sensitivity analysis related to our
interest rate swap is presented below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount |
|
$ |
100.0 |
|
Impact of a 100 basis point change in the benchmark interest rate: |
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount and fair value of liability |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
Our results of operations can be affected by changes in exchange rates. Net sales and
expenses in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes
based on the average exchange rate for the period. For the three months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, net sales from outside the U.S. represented 24.6% and 25.0%, respectively, of our total net
sales. Historically, foreign currency transaction gains (losses) have not had a material effect on
our overall operations. As of June 30, 2010, the impact to net income of a 10% change in exchange
rates is estimated to be approximately $2.2 million.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures. |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our current management, including
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. There are inherent
limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the
possibility of human error and circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures.
Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable
assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by
this report (June 30, 2010), our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide
reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or
submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported,
within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, there were no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
42
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings. |
On February 6, 2008, a class action lawsuit was filed against us in the U.S. District Court
for the Northern District of California styled Keilholtz v. Lennox Hearth Products, Lennox
Industries and Lennox International, Inc. The lawsuit, which involves no personal injury claims,
alleges that certain of our single-pane, glass-front, gas fireplaces are hazardous and that
consumers were not adequately warned, and seeks economic damages. On February 16, 2010, the court
issued an order certifying a nationwide class of plaintiffs.
The Company denies all liability and is vigorously defending this lawsuit. Litigation is
inherently uncertain and, at this time, we cannot accurately predict the outcome of this case or
the amount of any potential loss that we may incur in the future.
Other than the lawsuit described above, there have been no significant changes concerning our
legal proceedings since December 31, 2009. See Note 6 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements set forth in Part I, Item 1, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional
discussion regarding legal proceedings.
There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our 2009
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
In June 2008 our Board of Directors approved a new share repurchase plan for $300 million,
pursuant to which we are authorized to repurchase shares of our common stock through open market
purchases (the 2008 Share Repurchase Plan). The 2008 Share Repurchase Plan has no stated
expiration date. In the second quarter of 2010, we repurchased shares of our common stock as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price |
|
Total Number of |
|
may yet be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid per |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Total Number |
|
Share |
|
As Part of Publicly |
|
Under the Plans or |
|
|
of Shares |
|
(including |
|
Announced Plans |
|
Programs |
Period |
|
Purchased(1) |
|
fees) |
|
or Programs |
|
(in millions) |
April 1 through April 30 |
|
|
2,953 |
|
|
$ |
48.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
250.6 |
|
May 1 through May 31 |
|
|
1,156,609 |
|
|
$ |
43.64 |
|
|
|
1,152,300 |
|
|
$ |
200.3 |
|
June 1 through June 30 |
|
|
213,082 |
|
|
$ |
44.77 |
|
|
|
212,542 |
|
|
$ |
190.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,372,644 |
|
|
$ |
43.82 |
|
|
|
1,364,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This column reflects the repurchases of 1,364,842 shares under the
2008 Share Repurchase Plan and the surrender to LII of 7,802 shares of
common stock to satisfy tax-withholding obligations in connection with
the vesting of restricted stock and performance share units. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Lennox International Inc. (LII) (filed as
Exhibit 3.1 to LIIs Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration Statement No.
333-75725) filed on April 6, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of LII (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to LIIs Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on March 15, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference). |
43
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate for the Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of LII
(filed as Exhibit 4.1 to LIIs Amendment to Registration Statement on Form S-1/A
(Registration No. 333-75725) filed on June 16, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of July 27, 2000, between LII and ChaseMellon Shareholder
Services, L.L.C., as Rights Agent, which includes as Exhibit A the form of Certificate of
Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock setting forth the terms of the
Preferred Stock, as Exhibit B the form of Rights Certificate and as Exhibit C the Summary of
Rights to Purchase Preferred Stock (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to LIIs Current Report on Form 8-K
(File No. 001-15149) filed on July 28, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LII is a party to a long-term debt instrument under which the total amount of
securities authorized under such instrument does not exceed 10% of the total
assets of LII and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Pursuant to
paragraph 4(iii)(A) of Item 601(b) of Regulation S-K, LII agrees to furnish a
copy of such instrument to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of May 3, 2010, between the Company and U.S. Bank National
Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on S-3 (Registration No.
333-155796)). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
Form of First Supplemental Indenture among the Company, the guarantors party thereto
and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to
the Companys Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on S-3 (Registration
No. 333-155796)). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
Lennox International Inc. 2010 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to LIIs Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-15149) filed on May 19, 2010
and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
Underwriting Agreement, dated May 3, 2010, among the Company, the guarantors party
thereto and the underwriters named therein (filed as Exhibit 1.1 to LIIs Current Report on
Form 8-K (File No. 001-15149) filed on May 6, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of the principal executive officer (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of the principal financial officer (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (filed herewith). |
44
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: July 27, 2010 |
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC.
|
|
|
/s/ Robert W. Hau
|
|
|
Robert W. Hau |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(on behalf of registrant and as principal
financial officer) |
|
|
45