e10vkza
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K/A
AMENDMENT NO. 1
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal period ended December 31, 2004
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 000-51064
GREAT WOLF RESORTS, INC.
(Exact name of issuer as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
51-0510250 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
122 West Washington Avenue
|
|
53703 |
Madison, Wisconsin 53703
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code
608 661-4700
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Exchange on Which Registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
|
|
Nasdaq National Market |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the
Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
o No þ
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of
this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). o Yes
þ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of March 16, 2005, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting stock held by
non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $724,782,000 based on the closing price on the
Nasdaq for such shares.
The number of shares outstanding of the issuers common equity was 30,262,308 as of March 16,
2005.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated
by reference into Part III. A definitive Proxy Statement pursuant to Regulation 14A will be filed
with the Commission no later than May 2, 2005.
Great Wolf Resorts, Inc.
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
INDEX
2
EXPLANATORY NOTE
Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. (the Company) is filing this Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2004 to reflect the restatement of its consolidated
and combined financial statements, the notes
thereto, and related disclosures, for the year ended December 31, 2004.
During the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company determined that it was necessary to restate
previously issued financial statements for changes in the application of purchase accounting for
certain transactions entered into in December 2004. Due to errors in the application of purchase
accounting for those transactions, and due to other reclassifications
of assets, the Company has recorded adjustments (the Adjustments) to
restate the previously issued financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004.
The
Adjustments result primarily from the application of Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issues No.
98-3 and No. 04-1 with regard to the Companys recording of its formation transactions in December
2004. The Company recorded the formation transactions by applying the purchase method of
accounting in connection with the acquisition of seven resort-owning entities. This accounting was
presented in the Companys filings with the SEC for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the
quarters ended March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005.
The
Adjustments had the effect of decreasing the Companys cash and
cash equivalents by $2.0 million, increasing condominiums
under development by $2.4 million, increasing other current
assets by $2.0 million, increasing property and equipment by
$71.6 million, increasing other intangible assets by $19.1 million, decreasing goodwill by $63.5 million,
and increasing deferred tax liability by $29.6 million as of
December 31, 2004, and decreasing net cash provided by operating
activities by $2.4 million and decreasing net cash used in
investing activities by
$0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. The Adjustments
had no impact on net income as previously reported for the year ended December 31, 2004. The
Adjustments are described in the table in Note 15 to the consolidated
and combined financial statements.
This Form 10-K/A has not been updated except as required to reflect the effects of the
restatement. This amendment and restatement includes changes to
Part II, Items 6, 7, 8 and 9A.
Except as identified in the prior sentence, no other items included in the original Form 10-K have
been amended, and such items remain in effect as of the filing date of the original Form 10-K.
Additionally, this Form 10-K/A does not purport to provide an update or a discussion of any other
developments at the Company subsequent to the original filing.
3
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview and Development
As used herein, the terms we, our and us refer to Great Wolf Resorts, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, and its subsidiaries. All dollar amounts used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A are
in thousands, except per share amounts and operating statistics.
We are a family entertainment resort company that provides our guests with a high-quality
vacation at an affordable price. We are the largest owner, operator and developer in the United
States of drive-to family resorts featuring indoor waterparks and other family-oriented
entertainment activities, based on the number of resorts in operation. We provide a full-service
entertainment resort experience to our target customer base: families with children ranging in ages
from 2 to 14 years old that live within a convenient driving distance from our resorts. Our resorts
provide a consistent and comfortable environment throughout the year where our guests can enjoy our
various amenities and activities. We are a fully integrated resort company with in-house expertise
and resources in resort and indoor waterpark development, management, marketing and financing.
We own and operate four existing Great Wolf Lodge(R) resorts, our signature northwoods-themed
resorts, and one Blue Harbor Resort, a nautical-themed property. In addition, we own two Great Wolf
Lodge resorts that are under construction and scheduled to open for business during 2005. We are
also the licensor and manager of an additional Great Wolf Lodge resort in Niagara Falls, Ontario
that is owned and under development by an affiliate of Ripley Entertainment Inc., or Ripleys. We
are currently evaluating 12 to 14 additional markets for potential future development of Great Wolf
Lodge resorts, six of which are in active site negotiation. We anticipate that most of our future
resorts will be developed under our Great Wolf Lodge brand, but we may develop additional
nautical-themed resorts in other appropriate markets.
We were formed in May 2004 to succeed to the family entertainment resort business of our
predecessor companies, The Great Lakes Companies, Inc., and a number of its related entities. We
refer to these entities collectively as Great Lakes. Great Lakes developed and operated hotels
between 1995 and December 2004. In 1999, Great Lakes began its resort operations by purchasing
Great Wolf Lodge in Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin and developing the Great Wolf Lodge in Sandusky,
Ohio, which opened in 2001. In 2003, Great Lakes opened two additional Great Wolf Lodge resorts,
one in Traverse City, Michigan and the other in Kansas City, Kansas. In June 2004, Great Lakes
opened the Blue Harbor Resort in Sheboygan, Wisconsin. Immediately prior to the closing of our
initial public offering of common stock, which we refer to in this Form 10-K/A report as the IPO,
Great Lakes had two additional Great Wolf Lodge resorts under construction, one in Williamsburg,
Virginia and the other in the Pocono Mountains region of Pennsylvania. These resorts are scheduled
to open in late March and October of 2005, respectively.
On December 20, 2004, in connection with the closing of the IPO, we acquired each of these
resorts and the resorts currently under construction, as well as certain resort development and
management operations, in exchange for an aggregate of 14,032,896 shares of our common stock and
$97,600, in a series of transactions we refer to in this Form 10-K/A report as the formation
transactions. We also realized net proceeds of $248,700 from the sale of 16,100,000 shares of our
common stock in the IPO.
4
Properties Overview
We have five family entertainment resorts that are currently operating and two additional
resorts that are under construction, and we will manage one resort under construction that is owned
by a third-party licensee. We also have identified additional target markets for future resort
development and are in negotiations with respect to sites in six of these markets. The following
table presents an overview of our existing portfolio of resorts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indoor |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Revenue per |
|
Revenue per |
|
Revenue per |
|
|
Opened/Target |
|
|
|
|
|
Entertainment |
|
|
|
|
|
Daily |
|
Available |
|
Occupied |
|
Occupied |
Location |
|
Opening |
|
Rooms |
|
Area(2) |
|
Occupancy |
|
Rate |
|
Room(3) |
|
Room |
|
Room(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Approx. ft(2)) |
|
(%) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
Existing
Resorts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin Dells, WI |
|
May 1997(5) |
|
|
309 |
(6) |
|
|
64,000 |
|
|
|
62.2 |
|
|
|
188.76 |
|
|
|
117.47 |
|
|
|
78.44 |
|
|
|
267.20 |
|
Sandusky, OH(7) |
|
March 2001 |
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
41,000 |
|
|
|
68.0 |
|
|
|
231.45 |
|
|
|
157.50 |
|
|
|
94.33 |
|
|
|
325.78 |
|
Traverse City, MI |
|
March 2003 |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
|
69.4 |
|
|
|
223.43 |
|
|
|
155.04 |
|
|
|
97.25 |
|
|
|
320.68 |
|
Kansas City, KS |
|
May 2003 |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
49,000 |
|
|
|
64.4 |
|
|
|
196.18 |
|
|
|
126.31 |
|
|
|
89.67 |
|
|
|
285.85 |
|
Sheboygan, WI(8) |
|
June 2004 |
|
|
183 |
(9) |
|
|
54,000 |
|
|
|
58.3 |
|
|
|
190.35 |
|
|
|
110.93 |
|
|
|
161.26 |
|
|
|
351.61 |
|
Resorts Under
Construction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Williamsburg, VA |
|
March 2005 |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
66,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pocono Mountains, PA |
|
Fall 2005 |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
91,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Niagara Falls,
ONT(10) |
|
Spring 2006 |
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
94,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Information for our Sheboygan resort reflects operating results from the resorts opening in
June 2004 through December 31, 2004. |
|
(2) |
|
Our indoor entertainment areas generally include our indoor waterpark, game arcade,
childrens activity room and fitness room, as well as our Aveda concept spa, 3D virtual
reality theater, Wileys Woods and party room in the resorts that have such amenities. |
|
(3) |
|
Revenue per available room represents the total room revenue per total available rooms for
the year ended December 31, 2004, calculated by multiplying the occupancy by the average daily
rate. |
|
(4) |
|
Total revenue per occupied room is calculated by adding the average daily rate and other
revenue per occupied room. |
|
(5) |
|
Great Lakes purchased this property in November 1999. |
|
(6) |
|
Our Wisconsin Dells property also features 77 condominium units currently under construction. |
|
(7) |
|
Prior to May 2004, we operated this resort as a Great Bear Lodge. |
|
(8) |
|
Our Sheboygan property is branded as a Blue Harbor Resort. This resort is subject to a
98-year and 11-month ground lease with the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Sheboygan. |
|
(9) |
|
Our Blue Harbor Resort also features 64 individually owned two and four bedroom condominium
units. |
|
(10) |
|
An affiliate of Ripley Entertainment, Inc., our licensee, which we refer to as Ripleys, owns
this resort. We are assisting Ripleys with construction management and other pre-opening
matters related to the Great Wolf Lodge in Niagara Falls. We have granted Ripleys a license
to use the Great Wolf Lodge name for this resort for ten years after opening. We have agreed
to enter into a |
5
|
|
|
|
|
management agreement, pursuant to which we expect to operate the resort on behalf of Ripleys
for five years, and a central reservation services agreement. In conjunction with this project,
we expect to receive a one-time construction fee and ongoing license, central reservation
services and management fees. |
Northwoods Lodge Theme. Each of our Great Wolf Lodge resorts has a northwoods lodge theme,
with a rustic log exterior and cultured stone veneer that provides a dramatic and authentic log
cabin appearance. Our three-story, approximately 5,000 to 7,800 square-foot atrium lobbies are
designed in a northwoods cabin motif with exposed timber beams, massive stone fireplaces, mounted
wolves and other northwoods creatures, Native American art and an animated two-story clocktower
that provides theatrical entertainment for our younger guests. Throughout the common areas and in
each guest suite, we use sturdy, rustic furniture that complements the northwoods theme. We believe
that this consistent theme throughout our resorts creates a comfortable and relaxing environment
and provides a sense of adventure and exploration that the entire family can enjoy.
Guest Suites. All of our guest suites are themed luxury suites ranging in size from
approximately 385 square feet to 1,900 square feet. Substantially all of our rooms also include a
private deck or patio. Our resorts offer up to nine room styles to meet the needs and preferences
of our guests, including a selection of rooms with lofts, jacuzzis and fireplaces. Our standard
rooms include two queen beds and a third queen bed in the sleeper sofa, a wet bar, microwave oven,
refrigerator and dining and sitting area, and can accommodate up to six people. Our specialty rooms
can accommodate up to seven people and provide a separate area for children, including our KidCabin
Suites that feature a log cabin bunk bed room, our Wolf Den Suites that feature a themed den
enclosure with bunk beds and our KidKamp Suites that feature bunk beds in a themed tent enclosure.
We also offer larger rooms, such as our Majestic Bear Suite, which has a separate bedroom with a
king bed, a large dining and living area and can accommodate up to eight people. Our guest suites
have wallpaper, artwork and linens that continue the northwoods theme and provide for full room
service, pay-per-view movies and pay-per-play video games.
Indoor Waterparks. Our existing Great Wolf Lodge indoor waterparks are maintained at a warm
and comfortable temperature, range in size from approximately 34,000 to 43,000 square feet and have
a northwoods, totemic theme, including four-story totem poles, decorative rockwork and plantings,
all of which is contained in a five-story wooden beam structure. The focus of each Great Wolf Lodge
waterpark is our signature 12-level treehouse water fort. The fort is an interactive water
experience for the entire family that features over 60 water effects, including spray guns,
fountains, valves and hoses, has cargo netting and suspension bridges and is capped by an oversized
bucket that dumps between 700 and 1,000 gallons of water every five minutes. Our Blue Harbor Resort
has a 43,000 square-foot Breaker Bay waterpark including our 12-level Lighthouse Pier water fort
featuring a 1,000 gallon tipping ship. Our waterparks also feature high-speed body slides and inner
tube waterslides that wind in and out of the building into a splash-down pool, smaller slides for
younger children, zero-depth water activity pools for small children with geysers, a water curtain,
fountains and tumble buckets, a lazy river, additional activity pools for basketball, open swimming
and other water activities and two large free-form hot tubs, one of which is for adults-only. Each
waterpark is constructed with a special nonslip floor surface for maximum traction and has ample
deck space and good sight lines to enhance parental oversight. Our resorts under construction will
have indoor waterparks ranging in size from approximately 55,000 to 82,000 square feet with
additional attractions such as wave pools and water rollercoasters.
Approximately one million gallons of water are cycled through each of our waterparks every
hour in order to ensure cleanliness. Our primary operating equipment includes standard water pumps,
tanks and filters, located in separate spaces to allow for quick repairs or replacement. The water
and air quality of our waterparks is continuously monitored by computerized water and air treatment
systems and highly trained technicians in order to ensure a clean and safe environment. We seek to
minimize the use of chlorine. Most of the water purification is performed by an advanced ozone
water treatment system, which ensures the highest water quality and an absence of the typical
chlorine odor found in indoor pools. In addition, the water within each area circulates every hour
to maximize hygiene. Each waterpark area has its own water system so that a problem with any one
area can be quickly contained and does not affect the operations of the rest of the waterpark.
We expect recurring annual capital expenditures for each resort to be approximately 3-4% of
the resorts revenues, including the repair and maintenance of our waterpark equipment. As much of
the equipment used in our waterparks is designed for outdoor application and capable of
withstanding intense physical use and the elements year-round, wear and tear is minimal and we
believe our equipment has a long useful life. In addition, our water purification system minimizes
airborne chemicals and their potentially corrosive effects on materials and equipment and helps
extend the life of our equipment.
The safety of our guests is a primary focus in our waterparks. Our lifeguards receive one of
the highest levels of training and certification in the industry, provided by Jeff Ellis &
Associates, Inc., an international aquatic safety consulting company. Ellis & Associates conducts
quarterly unannounced safety inspections at each of our resorts to ensure that proper safety
measures and
6
procedures are maintained. All of our on duty lifeguards perform daily training exercises
under the supervision of a certified instructor. We also encourage our lifeguards to obtain EMT
certification, and we reimburse them for the costs of the training.
Our indoor waterparks are open from 8:30 a.m. until 10:00 p.m. seven days a week and admission
is generally only available to resort guests. Our general guests-only policy, at all of our resorts
other than our Sheboygan resort, allows our guests to avoid the long lines and other inconveniences
of daily admission-based waterparks.
Amenities. Each of our existing resorts features, and each of our resorts under construction
will feature, a combination of the following amenities. Our Blue Harbor resort amenities have
similar appropriate nautical- themed names.
|
|
|
Themed Restaurants. Our resorts feature one or more full-service, themed restaurants and
a themed bar and grille that serves alcoholic beverages and sandwiches. Our themed
restaurants include the Gitchigoomie Grill, with a life-sized sea plane suspended over the
dining area, Lumber Jacks Cook Shanty, the Loose Moose Bar & Grill, and the Camp Critter
Bar & Grille, which features a two-story realistic tree with a canopy of leaves and
canvas-topped booths with hanging lanterns, giving guests the impression that they are
dining in a northwoods forest campsite. Our Blue Harbor Resort features our On the Rocks Bar
& Grille and Rusty Anchor Buffet. |
|
|
|
|
Ice Cream Shop and Confectionery. Each of our Great Wolf Lodge resorts, with the
exception of our Sandusky resort, has a Bear Claw Café ice cream shop and confectionery that
provides sandwiches, Starbucks(R) coffee, pastries, ice cream, candies, home-made fudge and
other snacks that families can share together. Our Blue Harbor Resort has a Sweetshop
Landing confectionery. |
|
|
|
|
Snack Bar. Each of our waterparks has a snack bar that offers a variety of sandwiches,
pizzas and similar foods with ample seating so that our guests do not have to leave the
warmth and comfort of the waterparks. |
|
|
|
|
Gift Shop. Each of our resorts has a Buckhorn Exchange or Precious Cargo gift shop that
provides unique themed gifts, including Great Wolf Lodge logo merchandise, souvenirs,
collectibles and stuffed animals. The gift shop also offers resort toys, swimwear and
personal necessities. |
|
|
|
|
Full-Service Spa. Each of our resorts, with the exception of our Sandusky resort, has an
Aveda concept or Cameo spa that provides a relaxing get-a-way with a full complement of
massages, facials, manicures, pedicures and other spa treatments, as well as yoga classes
and a wide selection of Aveda products. We intend to add an Aveda concept spa to our
Sandusky Great Wolf Lodge resort. |
|
|
|
|
Game Arcade. Our Youkon Jacks or Northern Lights game arcades range in size from
approximately 3,900 to 7,000 square feet, have over 70 games of skill and are divided into
distinct areas with video and skill games that appeal to children of different ages. Tickets
won from the games may be exchanged for a wide selection of merchandise that appeals to our
younger guests. |
|
|
|
|
Cub Club. Our Cub Club rooms are professionally staffed childrens activity rooms with
programmed activities, including arts and crafts, games and nature hikes. Cub Club is a
frequent guest program for our younger guests. Cub Club membership is open to all children
who have stayed at one of our resorts and includes a periodic newsletter, exclusive offers,
rewards for each stay and a free meal and dessert when members visit during their birthday
month. We currently have more than 10,000 Cub Club members. Our Blue Harbor Resort features
a Crew Club frequent guest program and activities that are similar to our Cub Club. |
|
|
|
|
Animated Clocktower. Each of our Great Wolf Lodge resorts, with the exception of our
Sandusky resort, has a two-story animated clocktower located in the resorts main atrium
lobby. The clocktower provides daily theatrical entertainment through talking and singing
trees, animals and northwoods figures. Our Blue Harbor Resort features a 2,000 gallon water
fountain featuring a hand-blown glass sculpture and a music and light show located in its
main atrium lobby. |
|
|
|
|
Outdoor Water Amenities. Outdoor water amenities complement our indoor waterpark
facilities and allow our guests to take advantage of favorable weather conditions. Our
outdoor water amenities include activity pools and a large deck or patio area and are
generally open from May until September. Our Wisconsin Dells resort also has outdoor
waterslides. |
7
|
|
|
Fitness Room. Our fitness rooms contain aerobic exercise equipment and weight-lifting
machines with numerous televisions for active viewing. |
|
|
|
|
Meeting Space. Our resorts offer meeting rooms ranging from approximately 3,000 to over
7,000 square feet that are available for guest meetings, including a 99-seat,
state-of-the-art, symposium-style room at our Traverse City resort. |
|
|
|
|
Conference Facility. Our Blue Harbor Resort features an approximately 21,000 square-foot
attached conference facility that provides spaces ranging from approximately 1,000 square
feet to 10,000 square feet for a number of different types of conferences and conventions. |
|
|
|
|
Bikos 3D Theatre. Our 3D theatres, located at our Wisconsin Dells and Traverse City
resorts, provide a 12-minute virtual reality adventure for children and their parents. |
|
|
|
|
Wileys Woods. Wileys Woods is an interactive indoor live video game in a four-story,
approximately 16,000 square-foot structure located at our Wisconsin Dells resort. Children
ages three and older wear electronic wrist bands and gain points by navigating slides,
bridges, nets and mazes and performing a variety of tasks on over 60 machines and gadgets.
Admission to Wileys Woods is free for all resort guests and is open to the public for a fee
of $6 for children and $9 for adults, with free admission for children under the age of
three. |
Operating Properties
Our operating resorts are currently located in Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin; Sandusky, Ohio;
Traverse City, Michigan; Kansas City, Kansas; and Sheboygan, Wisconsin.
Great Wolf Lodge of Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin
Our Great Wolf Lodge, located on 25 acres in Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin, was originally
constructed in 1997 and acquired by Great Lakes in 1999.
Wisconsin Dells is a renowned family vacation destination that features a number of
entertainment options, including amusement parks, museums, live entertainment and other indoor
waterparks. According to its Visitor and Convention Bureau, the Wisconsin Dells area attracts over
two and a half million visitors each year and in 2003 attracted over $840,000 of vacation-related
expenditures. Wisconsin Dells is within a one-hour drive from Madison, Wisconsin; a two-hour drive
from Milwaukee, Wisconsin; and a three and one-half hour drive from Chicago, Illinois. According to
Third Wave Research, there are approximately 16.0 million people who live within 180 miles of the
resort.
Great Wolf Lodge of Wisconsin Dells has 309 guest suites and an approximately 38,000
square-foot indoor waterpark that includes our signature treehouse water fort. The resort offers a
number of revenue-enhancing amenities, including a themed restaurant, Loose Moose Bar & Grill, Bear
Claw Café ice cream shop and confectionery, Youkon Jacks game arcade, Buckhorn Exchange gift shop,
full-service Aveda concept spa, Wileys Woods, Bikos 3-D virtual reality adventure theater and
meeting rooms. The resort also includes non- revenue-generating amenities, such as an animated
two-story clocktower, Cub Club room and Iron Horse fitness center. In September 2004, we began
construction of 77 condominium units. In connection with this project, we intend to expand our
indoor waterpark accordingly, which we expect would be complete in 2005. In Summer 2005, we expect
to begin construction on enhancements to our indoor waterpark at this resort to add a wave pool and
other new attractions.
Great Wolf Lodge of Sandusky, Ohio
In March 2001, we opened our Great Bear Lodge in Sandusky, Ohio, which has the same theming as
each of our Great Wolf Lodge resorts and was re-named the Great Wolf Lodge of Sandusky in May 2004.
Sandusky is a family destination near Cleveland, Ohio that is well known for its amusement parks.
According to the Sandusky/FIB Erie County Visitors and Convention Bureau, Sandusky attracts
approximately seven million visitors each year. Sandusky is within a one-hour drive from Cleveland,
Ohio; a two-hour drive from Detroit, Michigan; a two and one-half-hour drive from Columbus, Ohio;
and a three-hour drive from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. According to Third Wave Research, there are
approximately 23.7 million people who live within 180 miles of the resort.
8
Great Wolf Lodge of Sandusky is located on approximately 15 acres and has 271 guest suites and
an approximately 34,000 square-foot indoor waterpark that includes our signature treehouse water
fort, tube slides, body slides, hot tubs and a lazy river. The resort offers a number of
revenue-enhancing amenities, including our Gitchigoomie Grill and Lumber Jacks Cook Shanty themed
restaurants, Northern Lights game arcade, Buckhorn Exchange gift shop and meeting rooms. The resort
also includes non-revenue-generating amenities such as our Cub Club room and Iron Horse fitness
center.
Great Wolf Lodge of Traverse City, Michigan
In March 2003, we opened our Great Wolf Lodge in Traverse City, Michigan. Traverse City is a
traditional family vacation destination with skiing and lake activities. According to the Traverse
City Convention and Visitors Bureau, Traverse City attracts approximately two million visitors each
year. Traverse City is within a three-hour drive from Grand Rapids, Michigan and the Saginaw/Flint,
Michigan area and a four-hour drive from Detroit, Michigan. This resort also draws guests from
Northern Indiana and Ohio. According to Third Wave Research, there are approximately 7.6 million
people who live within 180 miles of the resort.
Great Wolf Lodge of Traverse City is located on approximately 48 acres and has 281 guest
suites and an approximately 40,000 square-foot indoor waterpark that includes our signature
treehouse fort and Howling Wolf family raft. The resort offers a number of revenue-enhancing
amenities, including our Camp Critter Bar & Grille and Loose Moose Cottage themed restaurants,
Northern Lights game arcade, full-service Aveda concept spa, Bear Claw Café ice cream shop and
confectionery, Bikos 3D virtual reality adventure theater, Buckhorn Exchange gift shop and meeting
rooms. The resort also includes non-revenue-generating amenities such as our animated two-story
clocktower, Cub Club room and Iron Horse fitness center.
Great Wolf Lodge of Kansas City, Kansas
In May 2003, we opened our Great Wolf Lodge in Kansas City, Kansas as part of the Village West
tourist district that includes a Cabelas superstore, Nebraska Furniture Mart and the Kansas Nascar
Speedway. According to the Kansas City Convention and Visitors Bureau, Kansas City attracts
approximately five million visitors each year. Kansas City is within a one-hour drive from Topeka,
Kansas; a two and one-half hour drive from Jefferson City, Missouri; and a three-hour drive from
Lincoln, Nebraska. According to Third Wave Research, there are approximately 7.0 million people who
live within 180 miles of the resort.
Great Wolf Lodge of Kansas City is located on approximately 17 acres and has 281 guest suites
and an approximately 40,000 square-foot indoor waterpark that includes our signature treehouse
water fort. The resort offers a number of revenue-enhancing amenities, including our Camp Critter
Bar & Grille themed restaurant, Bear Claw Café ice cream shop and confectionery, full-service Aveda
concept spa, Northern Lights game arcade, Buckhorn Exchange gift shop and meeting rooms. The resort
also includes non-revenue-generating amenities such as our animated two-story clocktower, Cub Club
room and Iron Horse fitness center.
Blue Harbor Resort of Sheboygan, Wisconsin
In June 2004, we opened our Blue Harbor Resort on an approximately 12-acre property on the
shores of Lake Michigan in Sheboygan, Wisconsin. Sheboygan is a traditional family vacation
destination featuring lake activities and golf. Due to the nature of Sheboygan as a family vacation
destination on the water, we decided that a nautical theme would be more appropriate than our
typical northwoods lodge theme. This resort is modeled after a grand beach resort and decorated in
a manner consistent with that theme, including a nautical themed lobby and specialty rooms such as
the KidAquarium Suite with bunk beds surrounded by walls of deep blue sea and schools of fish and
the Boathouse Suite with rowboat bunk beds. According to the Sheboygan Convention and Visitors
Bureau, visitors to Sheboygan spent approximately $260,000 in 2002. Sheboygan is within a one-hour
drive from Milwaukee and Green Bay, Wisconsin; a two-hour drive from Madison, Wisconsin; a
three-hour drive from Chicago, Illinois; and a four-hour drive from Dubuque, Iowa. According to
Third Wave Research, there are approximately 18.4 million people who live within 180 miles of the
resort.
Blue Harbor Resort has 183 guest suites, with an additional 64 individually-owned, two and
four bedroom condominium units located adjacent to the resort, and an approximately 43,000
square-foot Breaker Bay indoor waterpark with a 12-level Lighthouse Pier water fort. The resort
offers a number of revenue-enhancing amenities, including our nautical-themed On the Rocks Bar &
Grille and Rusty Anchor Buffet restaurants, Sweetshop Landing ice cream shop and confectionery,
full-service Aveda concept spa, Northern Lights game arcade and Precious Cargo gift shop. This
resort also has an approximately 21,000 square-foot attached conference facility capable of seating
1,000 people. The resort offers non-revenue-generating amenities such as our 2,000 gallon
hand-blown glass water fountain featuring a music and light show, Crew Club for kids and Ship Shape
Place fitness center. Admission to the indoor waterpark is available to residents of Sheboygan
County for a fee. We currently manage the rental of substantially all of the
9
condominium units at this resort. We receive a rental management fee of approximately 40% of
net room revenue after the deduction of certain expenses. In addition, we receive reimbursement of
certain waterpark expenses through the condominium association.
Properties Under Construction
Great Wolf Lodge of Williamsburg, Virginia
In December 2003, we began construction of our Great Wolf Lodge in Williamsburg, Virginia on a
83-acre site. Williamsburg is a popular family vacation destination with amusement parks and
waterparks and other entertainment attractions. Williamsburg is a one-hour drive from Richmond,
Virginia; a two and one-half-hour drive from Washington, D.C.; a three-hour drive from Baltimore,
Maryland and a three and one-half-hour drive from Raleigh, North Carolina. According to Third Wave
Research, there are approximately 16.7 million people who live within 180 miles of the resort.
The resort will occupy approximately 36 acres of the site. We may sell up to 11 acres of the
excess land as out-lots and plan to retain the remaining acreage to support future expansion of the
resort.
Upon completion, Great Wolf Lodge of Williamsburg will have 301 guest suites and an
approximately 55,000 square-foot indoor waterpark that includes our signature treehouse water fort.
We are constructing a relatively large indoor waterpark in Williamsburg because we believe that the
demand for this resort will support an expansion, including an additional number of rooms, over the
next several years. The resort will offer a number of revenue-enhancing amenities, including themed
restaurants, a full-service Aveda concept spa, game arcade, Bear Claw Café ice cream shop and
confectionery, gift shop and approximately 7,000 square feet of meeting rooms. The resort will also
include non-revenue-generating amenities such as a two-story animated clocktower, Cub Club room and
fitness center. We anticipate that this resort will open in late March 2005.
Great Wolf Lodge of the Pocono Mountains
In April 2004, we began construction of a Great Wolf Lodge in the Pocono Mountains on a
95-acre site near Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania. The Pocono Mountains area is a popular family vacation
destination featuring family-oriented attractions and recreational activities. According to the
Official Convention and Visitors Bureau of Pennsylvanias Pocono Mountains, the Pocono Mountains
region attracts approximately three million visitors each year. The resort will be located within a
one and one-half-hour drive from New York, New York; a two-hour drive from Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania; a three and one-half hour drive from Baltimore, Maryland and a four-hour drive from
Washington, D.C. According to Third Wave Research, there are approximately 43.6 million people who
live within 180 miles of the resort.
Upon completion, Great Wolf Lodge of the Pocono Mountains will have 400 guest suites and an
approximately 78,000 square-foot indoor waterpark that includes our signature treehouse water fort.
The resort will offer a number of revenue-enhancing amenities, including a themed restaurant and
bar and grille, full-service Aveda concept spa, game arcade, gift shop and approximately 7,900
square feet of meeting rooms. The resort will also include non-revenue-generating amenities such as
a two-story animated clocktower, Cub Club room and fitness center. We anticipate that this resort
will open in the fall of 2005.
Great Wolf Lodge of Niagara Falls, Ontario
In January 2004, Great Lakes entered into a license agreement with Ripleys that authorizes
Ripleys to develop and operate a Great Wolf Lodge resort in Niagara Falls, Ontario. In addition,
the agreement allows Ripleys to use certain licensed trademarks, such as Cub Club, KidCabin,
Wileys Woods and Great Wolf Lodge. The term of the license agreement is ten years, with the
possibility of up to four successive five-year automatic renewals. Under the license agreement,
Ripleys is required to pay a monthly license fee, a brand marketing fee that we are obligated to
contribute to a marketing program and a fee related to furniture, fixtures and equipment start-up
costs. We may terminate the license agreement at any time, upon notice, if Ripleys fails to meet
its material obligations under the agreement. These obligations require Ripleys to meet payment
obligations in a timely manner, maintain and operate the resort in a manner consistent with our
operating standards and obtain our approval prior to the use of any of our licensed trademarks. In
addition, these material obligations restrict Ripleys to selling only products, goods and services
that we approve and from developing or managing a hotel with an indoor waterpark within the United
States until, at the earliest, January 2016.
We have also entered into a construction consulting agreement in connection with Ripleys
construction of the resort. Under the agreement, we are providing construction management and
consulting services for a fee. In addition, we are currently negotiating a
10
management services agreement and a reservation system agreement for this resort under which
we will manage the resort and provide central reservation systems services.
Ripleys began construction of the Niagara Falls resort in September 2004. Niagara Falls is a
popular family vacation destination. According to the City of Niagara Falls, Ontario website,
Niagara Falls attracts over 14 million visitors each year. Niagara Falls is less than a one hour
drive from Buffalo, New York; a one and one-half-hour drive from Toronto, Ontario; and a two and
one-half-hour drive from Syracuse, New York. Pursuant to the management services agreement, we will
operate the resort once it is completed.
Upon completion, Great Wolf Lodge of Niagara Falls will have 404 guest suites with an
approximately 82,000 square-foot indoor waterpark. The resort will offer a number of
revenue-enhancing amenities, including themed restaurants, ice cream shop and confectionery,
full-service Aveda concept spa, game arcade, gift shop and meeting space. The resort will also
include non-revenue-generating amenities such as a two-story animated clocktower, Cub Club room and
fitness center. We anticipate that this resort will open in the Spring of 2006.
Business and Growth Strategies
Our primary business objective is to increase long-term stockholder value by executing our
internal and external growth strategies. Our primary internal growth strategies are to:
|
|
|
Increase Total Resort Revenue. We intend to increase total resort revenue by increasing: |
|
|
|
Average Room Rate: We plan to increase our average room rate over time by driving
demand for our resorts and focusing on yield management techniques. We intend to increase
demand through aggressive sales and marketing and increased visibility and by enhancing
our brand image. We plan to employ our yield management techniques to project demand in
order to effectively direct our sales and marketing efforts and selectively increase room
rates. We believe that our focus on optimizing the relationship between room rates and
occupancies will allow us to maximize profitability. |
|
|
|
|
Average Occupancy: We intend to maintain high occupancy levels during peak times
and will focus on increasing our off-peak occupancies. Our off-peak occupancy levels
generally occur in May, September and during the middle of the week. Our occupancy levels
are affected by school calendars, with the summer months, spring break period and other
school holidays achieving the highest occupancy levels. We will continue to seek to
improve off-peak occupancy levels by holding special events and targeting group sales and
conferences. |
|
|
|
|
Other Revenue: We provide our guests with a self-contained vacation experience and
attempt to capture a significant portion of their spending on food and beverage,
entertainment and merchandise. Each Great Wolf Lodge generally contains at least one
themed restaurant, an ice cream shop and confectionery, snack shop, an Aveda concept spa,
gift shop and game arcade. The average non-room revenue, including the revenue from these
amenities, was approximately $95 per occupied room night for the year ended December 31,
2004. By providing these additional revenue-generating amenities, we seek to maximize the
amount of time and money spent on-site by our guests. We have also entered into a number
of co-marketing agreements with strategic partners and will enter into additional
co-marketing agreements in the future in order to increase other revenue. |
|
|
|
Leverage Our Economies of Scale. We will take advantage of the following economies of
scale: |
|
|
|
Increased Purchasing Power: We intend to capitalize on our increased purchasing
power with respect to operating supplies, food and beverage, insurance and employee
benefits. As the number of resorts we own and operate increases, we expect to be able to
leverage our increased buying volume and power to obtain more advantageous and
predictable pricing on commodity goods and services. In addition, we intend to manage
increases and fluctuations in the cost of electricity, water and natural gas for each of
our resorts by entering into volume-based contracts. |
|
|
|
|
Centralized Services: By centralizing certain of our services, we will focus on
decreasing our per unit costs, increasing our control over those services and be in a
position to deliver a greater quality of service to our customers. For example, our
central reservations call center operates every day of the year, has approximately 75
full and part-time employees and accepts reservations for all of our resorts. The call
center also has the capacity to efficiently handle high call volumes and will require
only limited additional incremental costs over the next several years as we increase our
portfolio of resorts. |
11
|
|
|
Build Upon Our Existing Brand Awareness and Loyalty. Our Great Wolf Lodge brand is
symbolized by our distinctive and easily identifiable theming, from our captivating
northwoods log cabin exterior, to our Native American totemic waterpark theme and signature
treehouse water fort, to our mascots and recognizable logos and merchandise. We believe we
have fostered strong customer and brand loyalty, which is evidenced by our high levels of
repeat and referral guests. We will continue to focus on ensuring that each of our guests
associates the Great Wolf Lodge brand with a memorable and consistent family vacation
experience. |
Our primary external growth strategies are to:
|
|
|
Capitalize on First-Mover Advantage. We intend to be the first to develop and operate
family entertainment resorts featuring indoor waterparks in our selected target markets. We
intend to continue to leverage our development expertise, existing platform and model and
our access to capital to take advantage of the significant barriers to entry associated with
the development of large family entertainment resorts with indoor waterparks like our Great
Wolf Lodge resorts. We will seek to set the standard for quality, build on visible sites and
capitalize on the opportunity to be located near other popular local attractions that draw
our target customers. We believe that the combination of our first mover advantage and the
significant barriers to entry in our target markets provide us with a competitive advantage. |
|
|
|
|
Focus on Development and Strategic Growth Opportunities. Family entertainment resorts
featuring indoor waterparks are a relatively new concept and a growing segment of the resort
and entertainment industries. We intend to focus on this growth opportunity by: |
|
|
|
Building in Target Markets: We intend to develop and open at least two new owned
resorts each year for the next several years. We have already identified potential
development locations in 12 to 14 of these target markets that meet our other criteria
for successful development. We are in negotiations for sites in six of these markets
that, if appropriate, will provide ample land for us to expand or sell out-lots in the
future for complementary uses. A new resort, from market selection to opening, can take
over four years to develop and build. We believe that our experience will enable us to
more efficiently develop and build new resorts in our target markets. |
|
|
|
|
Licensing Our Resort Concept Internationally: We plan to selectively seek
licensing and management opportunities internationally. Similar to our arrangement with
Ripleys in Niagara Falls, Ontario, we intend to enter into license and management
agreements with reputable companies that have local market knowledge in order to increase
revenues and expand the reach of our Great Wolf Lodge brand. |
|
|
|
|
Forming Strategic Partnerships: We will consider strategic partnerships on a
selective basis. For example, we have had discussions with several established companies
that control superior sites in certain of our target markets and have indicated an
interest in jointly developing a Great Wolf Lodge at or near one of their existing
entertainment venues. |
|
|
|
|
Expanding and Enhancing Existing Resorts: We intend to focus on growth
opportunities at our existing resorts by adding revenue-enhancing features that drive
ancillary vacation spending to certain of our resorts and meet our target returns,
including non-water based attractions. We also intend to pursue incremental
revenue-generating opportunities, such as expanding the number of rooms and adding
condominium units at certain of our resorts. In addition, we will consider adding
conference centers at existing resorts to capture convention and other business travel
revenue. |
|
|
|
Continue to Innovate. We intend to leverage our in-house expertise, in conjunction with
the knowledge and experience of our third-party suppliers and designers, to develop and
implement the latest innovations in family entertainment activities and amenities, including
waterpark attractions. We have received numerous industry awards for our guests
experiences, our operations, innovative development, sales and marketing initiatives and
materials, and employee retention. |
Our Competitive Strengths
We are the market leader for family entertainment resorts that feature indoor waterparks and
other family-oriented amenities in the United States. Our competitive strengths include:
|
|
|
Unforgettable Family Resort Experience. Each of our resorts provides a welcome
opportunity for families to spend quality time together, relax and reconnect. In addition to
our indoor waterparks, our resorts provide other activities and amenities that the entire
family can enjoy together. Our family amenities and activities include themed restaurants, a
game arcade, ice cream |
12
|
|
|
shop and confectionery, gift shop, snack shop, animated clocktower and fireside bedtime
stories. We also have amenities and activities tailored to each member of the family,
including our full-service Aveda concept spa, Cub Club for kids and fitness room. Our resorts
also offer special events, including seasonal and holiday activities, wild animal and nature
educational programs and other special events. We believe that our focus on delivering an
unforgettable family resort experience appeals to our target customers and results in repeat
visits and referrals. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we generated approximately 48% of
our room revenue from repeat visitors and referral guests. |
|
|
|
|
Value, Comfort and Convenience. Guest rooms at each of our resorts are spacious and
comfortable suites that generally range in size from approximately 385 square feet to 1,900
square feet and include a wet bar, microwave, refrigerator and dining and sitting area. Many
of the suites have specific themes that are geared toward enhancing our younger guests
experience, including our KidCabin(R) and Wolf Den Suites, which have a partitioned room
with bunk beds designed as log cabins and northwoods forest dens, respectively. All of our
resorts are within a convenient driving distance of our large target customer bases. Because
our indoor waterparks and our other amenities generally are not impacted by weather
conditions, we offer our guests a reliable experience. On average, a two-night stay at our
resorts costs a family of four approximately $600, making it a very affordable family
vacation option. |
|
|
|
|
Favorable Market Trends. We believe recent vacation trends favor our Great Wolf Lodge
concept as the number of families choosing to take shorter, more frequent vacations that
they can drive to has increased over the past several years. We believe that these trends
will continue and that we are well positioned to take advantage of them. We believe our
resorts are less affected by changes in economic cycles, as drive-to destinations are less
expensive and more convenient than destinations that require air travel. In addition, we
have identified over 50 markets in the United States that, according to Third Wave Research,
each have populations in excess of five million people located within a convenient driving
distance. |
|
|
|
|
Market Presence and Barriers to Entry. We are the largest owner and operator of family
entertainment resorts with indoor waterparks in the United States based on the number of
resorts in operation. We believe this market presence gives us a significant competitive
advantage in attracting guests and efficiently developing additional resorts. We believe our
closest competitor has one operating themed indoor waterpark resort and another under
construction. In addition, we believe the significant barriers to entry present in our
industry segment, including operational complexity, substantial capital requirements,
availability of suitable sites in desirable markets and a difficult, multi-year permitting
process, discourage other companies in the lodging and entertainment industries from
developing similar family entertainment resorts. A new Great Wolf Lodge resort typically
takes from one to three years to develop, which includes market selection, site selection
and permitting, an additional 15 to 18 months to build and costs approximately $65,000 to
$95,000. |
|
|
|
|
Focus on Safety. We invest heavily in safety measures in the design and operation of our
resorts. For example, we specifically design our waterparks with attention to sightlines and
safety precautions and use one of the most respected training methods in the water safety
industry to train each of our lifeguards. We design and construct our indoor waterparks with
state-of-the-art air quality and water treatment systems. We also maintain and periodically
upgrade our facilities to ensure that we provide our guests with best-in-class safety
measures and systems. |
|
|
|
|
Experienced Management Team and Committed and Motivated Staff. Our senior management team
has an average of approximately 14 years of experience in the hospitality, family resort and
real estate development industries and has significant expertise in operating complex,
themed, family entertainment resorts featuring indoor waterparks. In addition, we have a
team of skilled, loyal and committed employees at each of our resorts. We offer our resort
employees a number of benefits, including a pleasant and rewarding work environment,
career-oriented training, the ability to obtain consistent year-round work, which is
uncommon in the resort industry, and career growth opportunities. As a result, we believe
our employees are committed to delivering a superb customer experience and personally
assuring that our guests fully enjoy their family vacation. |
Industry Overview
We operate in the family entertainment resort segment of the travel and leisure industry.
The concept of a family entertainment resort with an indoor waterpark was first introduced in
Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin and has evolved there over the past 15 years. In an effort to boost
occupancy and daily rates, as well as capture off-season demand, hotel operators in the Wisconsin
Dells market began expanding indoor pools and adding waterslides and other water-based attractions
to existing hotels and resorts. The success of these efforts prompted several local operators to
build new, larger destination resorts based
13
primarily on this concept, including the Wilderness Hotel & Golf Resort, Treasure Island,
Raintree Resort, Kalahari and the Great Wolf Lodge (formerly known as the Black Wolf Lodge), which
Great Lakes purchased in 1999.
We believe that these properties, which typically are themed and include other resort features
such as arcades, retail shops and full food and beverage service in addition to the indoor
waterpark, have historically outperformed standard hotels in the market. According to United States
Realty Consultants, Inc., or USRC, the six largest waterpark resorts in the Wisconsin Dells had a
premium of 15 occupancy points and an ADR premium of $110 in 2003 as compared to the franchised
non-waterpark hotels in the market. We believe that the rate premiums and increased market share in
the Wisconsin Dells for hotels and resorts with some form of an indoor waterpark can be attributed
to several factors, including the ability to provide a year-round vacation destination without
weather-related risks, the wide appeal of water-based recreation and the favorable trends in
leisure travel discussed below. Although the rate premiums and increased market share in Wisconsin
Dells have been significant, no operator or developer other than Great Lakes has established a
regional portfolio of family entertainment resorts featuring indoor waterparks.
No standard industry definition for a family entertainment resort featuring an indoor
waterpark has developed. A recent USRC survey identified a total of 45 hotels with indoor waterpark
facilities in the United States and Canada, of which 17 meet USRCs definition of an indoor
waterpark destination resort. We do not believe that the non-destination resorts in the USRC survey
offer a comparable experience and quality level to compete with our resorts. Most of our resorts
are located in well-established, traditional drive-to family vacation destinations, which allows us
to leverage the popularity of these destinations by offering a complementary entertainment option
to existing venues and a high-quality family resort alternative. In addition, many of these
destinations offer beaches, theme parks, waterparks, amusement parks and many other forms of
outdoor activities that are only available on a seasonal basis. Within our enclosed resort
environment, our guests can enjoy a total resort experience year round, regardless of weather
conditions.
We believe there are characteristics of the domestic travel and leisure industry that indicate
families favor frequent, short, drive-to vacations. According to the Travel Industry Association of
America, or TIA, from 1994 to 2003 the number of domestic leisure trips taken by families grew from
approximately 96 million trips in 1994 to 154 million trips in 2003. In 2003, approximately 45% of
leisure trips lasted one to two nights. The primary mode of transportation for 77% of the overnight
leisure trips in 2003 was by automobile. We believe these statistics provide evidence that our
segment of the travel and leisure industry has strong demand characteristics that make our family
entertainment resorts attractive to leisure travelers. As a result, we expect these demand
characteristics to continue to support the expansion of the indoor waterpark concept. According to
USRC, the indoor waterpark resort concept is expanding outside of its traditional base in Wisconsin
Dells, Wisconsin.
Resort Operations
Each resort employs a general manager who is responsible for the operations of the particular
resort and who typically has 20-25 years of experience in the hospitality or family entertainment
industry. Our general managers oversee a staff of approximately 300 resort employees and are
assisted by an assistant general manager and directors for each of human resources, food and
beverage, housekeeping, aquatics, maintenance, sales and marketing and front office. A
corporate-level liaison for each department ensures consistency throughout our resorts while
allowing a particular resort to tailor its operations to best meet the needs of its guests.
Prior to assuming responsibility for a resort, general managers and assistant general managers
undergo a management training program designed to familiarize each trainee with various facets of
our management, operations and development programs. The program also emphasizes our guest service
policies and provides hands-on operating experience at the resort level. Our management training
program is intended to train assistant managers to become future general managers.
We strive to provide our guests with a fun and convenient experience in a warm and
family-friendly environment from the first day a new resort opens. To achieve this, a team of
experienced management members from our existing resorts, along with corporate liaisons, begins
training personnel at our new resorts one month prior to a resorts opening and is on site at the
new resort for a month after opening. We believe that this process ensures that the opening of a
new resort is efficient and that our culture of high quality and friendly customer service is
carried over to our new resorts, including our guests interactions with our front desk,
housekeeping, waterpark, restaurant and other staff members. In addition, we train our maintenance
personnel to minimize any operational problems that occur during the opening of a new resort,
including the operation of our waterparks. We believe that these efforts help to minimize any
problems associated with opening a new resort and give our first guests a favorable, memorable
experience that will build brand loyalty.
14
Training and Development
We believe that our ability to provide a warm family atmosphere where families can relax, play
and reconnect begins with our people and their ability to deliver quality customer service. We seek
to recruit, train and retain employees who will make sure that our guests enjoy their stay, and we
seek to promote from within our company. Each new resort employee undergoes a week-long orientation
program and is paired with a more veteran employee for a month so that the new employee can learn
more about our resorts, our culture and how we strive to provide the best possible customer
service. Our employees are invested in our success and focused on ensuring a memorable experience
for each of our guests. We believe that our high level of customer service sets us apart and
promotes valuable referrals and repeat visits.
Sales and Marketing
We place a significant emphasis on the sales and marketing of our unique, family-focused
resorts. We work together with a third-party consulting firm to analyze the demographics of our
markets and to identify potential guests for targeted marketing, both within our primary market
areas and beyond those areas to attract occasional or seasonal travelers. We market to these
potential customers through a combination of television, radio, newspaper and direct mail
advertising, including advertising through local chambers of commerce and convention and visitors
bureaus. We also rely upon repeat guests and guest referrals, as well as brand recognition and the
visibility of the resorts themselves, which are located along major highways in high traffic areas.
In addition, our engaging website offers detailed information about our resorts, including virtual
tours and room layouts.
For new resorts, our marketing efforts begin before construction commences and we establish
sales offices to generate advance bookings. Reservations may be made at our resorts, through our
web site or through our central reservations call center. Our call center and highly trained staff
allow us to offer consistent specials throughout our resorts, better track room occupancy levels
and room rates and handle the high volume of calls that are usually associated with the opening of
a resort.
We maintain an in-house sales force and graphic arts department comprised of 10 employees. Our
experienced staff develops products and promotions for use in merchandising and marketing
promotions. We also engage in cross-marketing, promotions and co-marketing arrangements with major
vendors. We have received numerous awards for our general advertising, website, print media, radio
commercials and sales presentations.
We have developed Cub Club, a frequent guest program for children. Membership is available to
all children who have stayed at one of our resorts. The benefits of the program include coupons and
other incentives, a periodic newsletter, access to the Cub Club activity rooms at each of our
resorts and special offers to children who visit during their birthday month. Our Blue Harbor
Resort features a Crew Club program for children similar to the Great Wolf Lodge resorts Cub Club.
Maintenance and Inspections
Each of our resorts has an aquatics manager who is trained in all aspects of water quality and
safety. Our waterparks are frequently inspected by on-site maintenance personnel. These inspections
include safety checks of the equipment in the waterpark, as well as analyses of water and air
quality. Our water quality levels are constantly monitored and tested by computers and by a
full-time aquatics maintenance engineer, who works with an additional assistant during our busiest
months. Our air quality system is designed to minimize humidity and moisture build-up, which
materially reduces maintenance costs. Furthermore, we use Ellis & Associates as water safety
consultants at our resorts in order to train lifeguards and audit safety procedures.
Our senior management and the individual resort personnel evaluate the risk aspects of each
resorts operation, including potential risks to the public and employees and staff. Each resort
has six full time maintenance employees on staff that ensure building quality and three fulltime
aquatics maintenance employees that ensure the ride safety and air and water quality inside the
resorts indoor waterpark. We use a state of the art filtration system and ozonators to balance the
water and air quality within the waterpark in order to accommodate fluctuating quantities of
visitors.
15
Development Criteria
We choose sites for the development of new resorts based upon a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
Large target customer base. We select development sites that generally have a minimum of
five million target customers within a convenient driving distance. Because we offer an
affordable vacation experience, we appeal to families in a variety of income ranges. |
|
|
|
|
Recognized tourist destination. We focus on drive-to destinations that attract a large
number of tourists, including traditional family vacation markets. We believe we can charge
premium rates in these markets due to the high quality of our resorts and our
family-oriented amenities and activities. In addition, the indoor nature of many of our
amenities and activities allows us to reduce the impact of seasonality that negatively
affects other attractions in these areas. These areas also often have active and effective
local visitors and convention bureaus that complement our marketing and advertising efforts
at little or no cost to us. |
|
|
|
|
Highly visible and large sites. We develop resorts in highly visible locations along
major roadways. Visibility from highways enhances easy drive-to access, provides marketing
benefits due to high volumes of traffic and often produces synergies from adjacent land uses
or complementary developments. We generally choose sites that have enough acreage to allow
for potential expansions and future sales of out-lots. |
Based upon these criteria, we have identified over 50 markets that have populations of at
least five million people located within a convenient driving distance. We have already identified
potential development locations in 12 to 14 of these target markets that meet our other criteria
for successful development. We are in negotiations for sites in six of these markets. In addition,
our licensee, Ripleys, is developing a Great Wolf Lodge in Niagara Falls, Ontario that we will
operate pursuant to our license and management agreement with Ripleys.
Once we have identified a market that meets our development criteria, we search for potential
sites, which may be difficult to find in some areas. We then perform initial analyses of the
permitting process and access to utilities, before acquiring a sufficient amount of land from one
or more landowners. Based upon the target customer base of the market, we develop initial
specifications for the resort, such as the number of guest suites and size of the indoor waterpark
and other amenities. We also formally begin the potentially lengthy and difficult process of
obtaining the necessary approvals and permits from the appropriate local governmental bodies,
including the necessary water rights and environmental permits. Once the permitting process is
complete, we secure financing for the project and begin construction on the resort. This overall
development process typically takes from two and one-half to four years.
Our Customers
Our target customer base consists of families with children ranging in age from 2 to 14 years
old who live within a convenient driving distance from our resorts. We believe that most families
choose our resorts either for taking a primary vacation during the year or for weekend or holiday
getaways. According to research conducted by Third Wave Research at our Wisconsin Dells and
Sandusky resorts, families choosing us as their primary vacation destination account for
approximately 60% of our annual room nights and approximately 40% of our total revenue, while
families choosing us for weekend and holiday getaways account for approximately 25% of our annual
room nights and approximately 30% of our total revenue. Although we have not had studies performed
at our other resorts, we believe our other resorts would have similar statistics.
In addition, meeting facilities at our resorts allow us to attract other types of customers,
such as small companies, business groups and social clubs. We believe that the 21,000 square foot
conference center located at our Sheboygan resort will allow us to attract larger companies and
industry groups to that resort.
Competition
Our resorts compete with other forms of family vacation travel, including theme parks,
waterparks, amusement parks and other recreational activities, including other resorts located near
these types of attractions. Our business is also subject to factors that affect the recreation and
leisure and resort industries generally, such as general economic conditions and changes in
consumer spending habits. We believe that the principal competitive factors of a family
entertainment resort include location, room rates, name recognition, reputation, the uniqueness and
perceived quality of the attractions and amenities, the atmosphere and cleanliness of the
attractions and amenities, the quality of the lodging accommodations, the quality of the food and
beverage service, convenience, service levels and reservation systems.
16
A recent US Realty Consultants, Inc. (USRC) survey identified 24 existing properties in the
United States and Canada meeting their definition of an indoor waterpark destination resort that
are currently open and 14 additional destination resorts expected to open in 2005. Two additional
waterparks are identified as under construction and expected to open in 2006 and additional resorts
currently in development are considered likely to begin construction in 2005 and open in 2006.
Based on the USRC survey, our eight resorts that we expect to be open at the end of 2005 will
comprise approximately 21% of the supply of existing destination waterpark resorts in this market
segment.
As a result of our market presence and our management teams substantial experience, we
believe we have an opportunity to capitalize on our first-mover advantage in this industry segment
and to achieve significant brand recognition. While we believe that our first-mover advantage is
very beneficial to us, it does provide our competitors with an opportunity to monitor our success
in our chosen markets. As such, a competitor may choose not to enter one of our markets based on
our performance, or may subsequently develop a resort in our markets that is newer, has additional
amenities, or offers more, larger or more exciting waterpark attractions than our resorts.
In most of our markets, there are few, if any, other family entertainment resorts featuring
indoor waterparks. However, in Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin, where indoor waterparks were first
introduced, there are approximately 16 other resorts and hotels with some type of indoor
water-related activity or amenity. As a result, we face significant competition from both lower
priced unthemed waterparks and larger, more expensive waterparks with thrill rides and other
attractions in the Wisconsin Dells market. While the Wisconsin Dells market has a significant
number of resorts with indoor waterparks, we believe the competitive landscape in that small,
regional market is not representative of the competition we may face as we further expand our
portfolio of resorts. The vast majority of indoor waterpark resorts in Wisconsin Dells are
family-owned or privately operated businesses that have yet to develop additional resorts outside
of Wisconsin Dells. In addition, we believe our ability to compete effectively in this highly
competitive market will enable us to more effectively compete in other markets where we may not be
the only family entertainment resort.
We anticipate that competition within some of our markets will increase in the foreseeable
future. We believe that a number of other resort operators are developing or considering the
development of family entertainment resorts with indoor waterparks, which will compete with our
resorts. One of these resorts is being constructed by a competitor in Sandusky and another resort
is being constructed by a competitor near Traverse City.
Governmental Regulation
The ownership and management of our resorts, as well as our development and construction of
new resorts, subjects us to comprehensive federal, state and local laws regulating zoning, land
development, land use, building design and construction, and other real estate-related laws and
regulations. In addition, a number of states regulate the permitting and licensing of resorts by
requiring registration, disclosure statements and compliance with specific standards of conduct.
Our failure to maintain or acquire the requisite licenses, permits and authorizations required by
such laws and regulations, as well as any failure on our part to comply with registration,
disclosure and standards of conduct required by such laws and regulations could impact the
operation, profitability and success of our current resorts or the development, completion and
success of any resorts we may develop in the future.
We believe that each of our resorts has the necessary permits and approvals to operate its
business and is in material compliance with all applicable registration, disclosure and conduct
requirements. We intend to continue to obtain such permits and approvals for any resorts we may
develop in the future or additions or renovations to current resorts and to ensure that such
resorts and additions or renovations comply with applicable registration, disclosure and conduct
requirements.
We are also subject to laws and regulations governing our relationship with employees,
including minimum wage requirements, overtime, working conditions and work permit requirements. An
increase in the minimum wage rate, employee benefit costs or other costs associated with employees
could increase our overall labor costs.
The operation of our waterparks subjects us to state and local regulations governing the
quality of the water we use in our waterparks, including bacteriological, chemical, physical and
radiological standards. In addition to inspections we conduct on our own, state and local
authorities may also conduct inspections of our waterparks to determine our compliance with
applicable standards. If we are found to be in violation of such regulations we could be subject to
various penalties, including, but not limited to, monetary fines and the temporary closure of our
waterparks. Changes in state or local regulations could impose more stringent standards with which
we would have to comply.
17
We are subject to both federal and state environmental laws and regulations, including laws
and regulations governing the discharge of water from our waterparks. Specifically, under the
requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act, we must obtain National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System permits from the Environmental Protection Agency or from the state environmental
agency to which the permit program has been delegated for discharges into waterways and comply with
the permit terms regarding wastewater quality and discharge limits. Such permits must be renewed
from time-to-time, as required by regulation and additional capital expenditures for wastewater
treatment systems associated with the renewal of our water discharge permits may be required.
Importantly, changes in federal or state legislation or regulations could impose more stringent
release standards with which we would have to comply. Currently, our development in the Pocono
Mountains is our only property subject to such laws and regulations governing the discharge of
water and we intend to comply with these laws and regulations as we develop that property.
As a place of public accommodation, our resorts are subject to the requirements of the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, which we refer to as the ADA. As such, our resorts are
required to meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. While
we believe that our resorts are substantially in compliance with these requirements, we have not
conducted an audit or investigation of all of our resorts to determine our compliance. Further,
federal legislation or regulations may amend the ADA to impose more stringent requirements with
which we would have to comply.
Environmental Matters
Our operations and properties are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations
relating to the protection of the environment, natural resources and worker health and safety,
including laws and regulations governing and creating liability relating to the management, storage
and disposal of hazardous substances and other regulated materials. Our properties are also subject
to various environmental laws and regulations that govern certain aspects of our on-going
operations. These laws and regulations control such things as the nature and volume of our
wastewater discharges, quality of our water supply and our waste management practices. The costs of
complying with these requirements, as they now exist or may be altered in the future, could
adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Because we own and operate real property, various federal, state and local laws may impose
liability on us for the costs of removing or remediating various hazardous substances, including
substances that may be currently unknown to us, that may have been released on or in our property
or disposed by us at third-party locations. The principal federal laws relating to environmental
contamination and associated liabilities that could affect us are the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act; state
and local governments have also adopted separate but similar environmental laws and regulations
that vary from state to state and locality to locality. These laws may impose liability jointly and
severally, without regard to fault and whether or not we knew of or caused the release. The
presence of hazardous substances on a property or the failure to meet environmental regulatory
requirements may materially adversely affect our ability to use or sell the property, or to use the
property as collateral for borrowing, and may cause us to incur substantial remediation or
compliance costs. In addition, if hazardous substances are located on or released from one of our
properties, we could incur substantial liabilities through a private party personal injury claim, a
claim by an adjacent property owner for property damage or a claim by a governmental entity for
other damages, such as natural resource damages. This liability may be imposed on us under
environmental laws or common-law principles.
We obtain environmental assessment reports on the properties we own or operate as we deem
appropriate. These reports have not revealed any environmental liability or compliance concerns
that we believe would materially adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
However, the environmental assessments that we have undertaken might not have revealed all
potential environmental liabilities or claims for such liabilities. It is also possible that future
laws, ordinances or regulations or changed interpretations of existing laws and regulations will
impose material environmental liability or compliance costs on us, that the current environmental
conditions of properties we own or operate will be affected by other properties in the vicinity or
by the actions of third parties unrelated to us or that our guests could introduce hazardous or
toxic substances into the resorts we own or manage without our knowledge and expose us to liability
under federal or state environmental laws. The costs of defending these claims, complying with as
yet unidentified requirements, conducting this environmental remediation or responding to such
changed conditions could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Some of our resort properties may have contained, or are adjacent to or near other properties
that have contained or currently contain underground storage tanks for the storage of petroleum
products or other hazardous or toxic substances. If hazardous or toxic substances were released
from these tanks, we could incur significant costs or, with respect to tanks on our property, be
liable to third parties with respect to the releases.
18
On occasion, we may elect to develop properties that have had a history of industrial
activities and/or historical environmental contamination. Where such opportunities arise, we engage
third-party experts to evaluate the extent of contamination, the scope of any needed environmental
clean-up work, and available measures (such as creation of barriers over residual contamination and
deed restrictions prohibiting groundwater use or disturbance of the soil) for ensuring that planned
development and future property uses will not present unacceptable human health or environmental
risks or exposure to liabilities. If those environmental assessments indicate that the development
opportunities are acceptable, we also work with appropriate governmental agencies and obtain their
approvals of planned site clean-up, development activities, and the proposed future property uses.
We have followed that process in connection with the development of our Blue Harbor Resort in
Sheboygan, Wisconsin where the City of Sheboygan has arranged for environmental clean-up work and
ongoing groundwater monitoring and we have agreed to the use of a barrier preventing contact with
residual contamination and implementation of a deed restriction limiting site activities. To our
knowledge, our work at our Sheboygan resort has been conducted in accordance with requirements
imposed by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Based on these efforts, we are not aware
of any environmental liability or compliance concerns at our Sheboygan resort that we believe would
materially adversely affect our financial conditions or results of operations. It is possible,
however, that our efforts have not identified all environmental conditions at the property or that
environmental conditions and liabilities associated with the property could change in the future.
Future acquisitions of properties subject to environmental requirements or affected by
environmental contamination could require us to incur substantial costs relating to such matters.
In addition, environmental laws, regulations, wetlands, endangered species and other land use and
natural resource issues affecting either currently owned properties or sites identified as possible
future acquisitions may increase costs associated with future site development and construction
activities or business or expansion opportunities, prevent, delay, alter or interfere with such
plans or otherwise adversely affect such plans.
Insurance
We believe that our properties are covered by adequate fire, flood and property insurance, as
well as commercial liability insurance with what we believe are commercially reasonable deductibles
and limits for our industry. Changes in the insurance market since September 11, 2001 have caused
significant increases in insurance costs and deductibles, and have increased the risk that
affordable insurance may not be available to us in the future.
While our management believes that our insurance coverage is adequate, if we were held liable
for amounts and claims exceeding the limits of our insurance coverage or outside the scope of our
insurance coverage, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially
and adversely affected.
Intellectual Property
We have registered, applied for the registration of or claim ownership of a variety of trade
names, service marks, copyrights and trademarks for use in our business, including Biko the Bear,
Blue Harbor Resort, Boathouse Suite, Breaker Bay, Crew Club, Cub Club, Great Wolf Lodge, Great Wolf
Resorts, KidAquarium Suite, KidCabin and Wiley the Wolf in the United States and, where
appropriate, in foreign countries. There can be no assurance that we can obtain the registration
for the marks where registration has been sought. We are not aware of any facts that would
negatively impact our continuing use of any of the above trade names, service marks or trademarks.
We consider our intellectual property rights to be important to our business and actively defend
and enforce them.
Employees
As of December 31, 2004, we had approximately 120 corporate employees, including our central
reservations center employees, and approximately 1,600 resort-level employees, approximately 700 of
whom were part-time employees. Unlike more seasonal resorts and attractions, we are open year-round
and are able to attract and retain high quality employees throughout the year. However, we do have
fewer part-time employees during the winter months. None of our employees is covered by a
collective bargaining agreement. We believe that our relationship with our employees is good.
Offices
We lease approximately 13,800 square feet of office space for our corporate headquarters
office and approximately 2,500 square feet of office space for our central reservations call center
operations in Madison, Wisconsin. We also lease approximately 3,800 square feet of office space in
Falls Church, Virginia. We believe these facilities are adequate for our current needs.
19
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our principal executive
officer and senior financial officers. It is available in the investor relations section of our
website, which is located at www.greatwolfresorts.com. In the event that we make changes to or
provide waivers from the provisions of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that the SEC
requires us to disclose, we intend to disclose these events in the investor relations section of
our website.
Risk Factors
The risk factors set forth below are applicable to Great Wolf Resorts. You should carefully
consider the following factors in evaluating our company, our properties and our business. The
occurrence of any of the following risks could materially adversely affect, among other things, our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risk Factors Related to Our Business
We may not be able to develop new resorts or further develop existing resorts on a timely or cost
efficient basis, which would adversely affect our growth strategy.
As part of our growth strategy, we intend to develop additional resorts and to further expand
our existing resorts. Development involves substantial risks, including the following risks:
|
|
|
development costs may exceed budgeted or contracted amounts; |
|
|
|
|
delays in completion of construction; |
|
|
|
|
failure to obtain all necessary zoning, land use, occupancy, construction, operating and
other required governmental permits and authorizations; |
|
|
|
|
changes in real estate, zoning, land use, environmental and tax laws; |
|
|
|
|
unavailability of financing on favorable terms; |
|
|
|
|
failure of developed properties to achieve desired revenue or profitability levels once opened; |
|
|
|
|
competition for suitable development sites from competitors that may have greater
financial resources or risk tolerance than we do; and |
|
|
|
|
the incurrence of substantial costs in the event a development project must be abandoned
prior to completion. |
In particular, resort construction projects entail significant risks, including shortages of design
and construction expertise, materials or skilled labor, unforeseen engineering, environmental or
geological problems, work stoppages, weather interference, floods and unanticipated cost increases.
There are also a limited number of suppliers and manufacturers of the equipment we use in our
indoor waterparks. We may not be able to successfully manage our development to minimize these
risks, and there can be no assurance that present or future developments will perform in accordance
with our previous developments or our expectations.
We compete with other family vacation travel destinations and resorts.
Our resorts compete with other forms of family vacation travel, including theme, water and
amusement parks and other recreational activities. Our business is also subject to factors that
affect the recreation and leisure and resort industries generally, such as general economic
conditions and changes in consumer spending habits. We believe the principal competitive factors of
a family entertainment resort include location, room rates, name recognition, reputation, the
uniqueness and perceived quality of the attractions and amenities, the atmosphere and cleanliness
of the attractions and amenities, the quality of the lodging accommodations, the quality of the
food and beverage service, convenience, service levels and reservation systems.
20
We anticipate that competition within some of our markets will increase in the foreseeable
future. A number of other resort operators are developing family entertainment resorts with indoor
waterparks that will compete with some or all of our resorts. In particular, one of our current
competitors is constructing a resort in the Sandusky market. We compete for guests and for new
development sites with certain of these entities that may have greater financial resources than we
do and better relationships with lenders and sellers of real estate. These entities may be able to
accept more risk than we can prudently manage and may have greater marketing and financial
resources. Further, there can be no assurance that new or existing competitors will not
significantly reduce their rates or offer greater convenience, services or amenities, significantly
expand or improve resorts, including the addition of thrill rides, in markets in which we
operate. Such events could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We may not be able to manage our expected growth, which could adversely affect our operating
results.
Since 1999, we have experienced substantial growth as we have grown from operating one resort
to currently owning and operating five resorts with two additional owned resorts scheduled to open
in 2005 and a licensed resort that we will manage scheduled to open in 2006. We intend to continue
to develop additional resorts and manage additional licensed resorts owned by third parties. Our
anticipated growth could place a strain on our management, employees and operations. Our growth has
increased our operating complexity and the level of responsibility for new and existing management.
Our ability to compete effectively and to manage our recent and future growth effectively will
depend on our ability to implement and improve financial and management information systems on a
timely basis and to effect changes in our business, such as implementing internal controls to
handle the increased size of our operations and hiring, training, developing and managing an
increasing number of experienced management-level and other employees. Unexpected difficulties
during expansion, the failure to attract and retain qualified employees or our inability to respond
effectively to recent growth or plan for future expansion, could adversely affect our results of
operations.
Accidents or injuries in our resorts, particularly in our waterparks, may subject us to liability,
and accidents or injuries at our resorts or at competing resorts with waterparks could adversely
affect our safety reputation and attendance, which would harm our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
There are inherent risks of accidents or injuries at family entertainment resorts, including
accidents or injuries at waterparks, particularly for small children if their parents do not
provide appropriate supervision. Despite our emphasis on safety, the lifeguards in our indoor
waterparks and our other resort staff cannot prevent every accident or injury. Potential waterpark
accidents and injuries include falls, cuts or other abrasions, sickness from contaminated water,
injuries resulting from equipment malfunctions and drownings. One or more accidents or injuries at
any of our waterparks or at other waterparks could reduce attendance at our resorts, adversely
affect our safety reputation among our potential customers, decrease our overall occupancy rates
and increase our costs by requiring us to take additional measures to make our safety precautions
even more visible and effective.
If accidents or injuries occur at any of our resorts, we may be held liable for costs related
to the injuries. We maintain insurance of the type and in the amounts that we believe are
commercially reasonable and that are available to businesses in our industry, but there can be no
assurance that our liability insurance will be adequate or available at all times and in all
circumstances to cover any liability for these costs. Our business, financial condition and results
of operations would be adversely affected to the extent claims and associated expenses resulting
from accidents or injuries exceed our insurance recoveries.
Our predecessor entities have a history of losses and we may not be able to achieve or sustain
profitability.
Our predecessor entities incurred net losses in the period ended December 20, 2004 and in each
of the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. We cannot guarantee that we will become profitable.
Given the increasing competition in our industry and capital intensive nature of our business, we
may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis, and our
failure to do so would adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Our business is dependent upon family vacation patterns, which may cause fluctuations in our
revenues.
Since most families with small children choose to take vacations during school breaks and on
weekends, our occupancy is highest on the weekends and during months with prolonged school breaks,
such as the summer months and spring break weeks in March and April. Our occupancy is lowest during
May and September as children return to school following these prolonged breaks. As a result of
these family vacation patterns, our revenues may fluctuate. We may be required to enter into
short-term borrowings in slower periods in order to offset such fluctuations in revenues and to
fund our anticipated obligations. In addition, adverse events occurring during our peak occupancy
periods would have an increased impact on our results of operations.
21
We may not be able to attract a significant number of customers from our key target markets, which
would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our strategy emphasizes attracting and retaining customers from the local, or drive-to,
markets within a convenient driving distance from each of our resorts. Any resorts we develop in
the future are similarly likely to be dependent primarily on the markets in the immediate vicinity
of such resorts. There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to attract a sufficient
number of customers in our local markets to make our resort operations profitable. If we fail to do
so, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.
Because we concentrate in a single industry segment, we may be adversely affected by a downturn in
that industry segment.
Our assets and operations are concentrated in a single industry segment family entertainment
resorts. Our current strategy is to expand the number of our resorts and improve our existing
resorts. Therefore, a downturn in the entertainment, travel or vacation industries, in general, and
the family entertainment resort segment, in particular, could have an adverse effect on our
business and financial condition.
Changes in consumer spending habits may affect our growth, financial condition and results of
operations.
The success of our operations depends to a significant extent upon a number of factors
relating to discretionary consumer spending, including economic conditions affecting disposable
consumer income such as employment, business conditions, interest rates and taxation. There can be
no assurance that consumer spending will not be adversely affected by economic conditions, thereby
impacting our growth, financial condition and results of operations.
Increases in operating costs and other expense items could reduce our operating margins and
adversely affect our growth, financial condition and results of operations.
Increases in operating costs due to inflation and other factors may not be directly offset by
increased room and other revenue. Our most significant operating costs are our labor, energy,
insurance and property taxes. Many, and in some cases all, of the factors affecting these costs are
beyond our control.
Labor is our primary resort-level operating expense. As of December 31, 2004, we employed
approximately 1,600 hourly-wage and salaried employees in our resorts. If we face labor shortages
or increased labor costs because of increased competition for employees, higher employee turnover
rates or increases in the federal minimum wage or other employee benefits costs (including costs
associated with health insurance coverage), our operating expenses could increase and our growth
could be adversely affected. Our success depends in part upon our ability to attract, motivate and
retain a sufficient number of qualified employees, including resort managers, lifeguards, waterpark
maintenance professionals and resort staff, necessary to keep pace with our expansion schedule. The
number of qualified individuals needed to fill these positions is in short supply in some areas.
Although we have not yet experienced any significant problems in recruiting or retaining employees,
any future inability to recruit and retain sufficient individuals may delay the planned openings of
new resorts. Competition for qualified employees could also require us to pay higher wages to
attract a sufficient number of employees.
Energy costs also account for a significant portion of our total resort-level operating
expenses. The price of energy is volatile, and shortages sometimes occur. Significant increases in
the cost of energy, or shortages of energy, could interrupt or curtail our operations and lower our
operating margins.
The costs for maintaining adequate insurance coverage fluctuate and are generally beyond our
control. If insurance rates increase and we are not able to pass along those increased costs to our
customers through higher room rates and amenity costs, our operating margins could suffer.
Each of our resorts is subject to real and personal property taxes. The real and personal
property taxes on our resorts may increase or decrease as tax rates change and as our resorts are
assessed or reassessed by taxing authorities. If property taxes increase and we are unable to pass
these increased costs along to our customers through higher room rates and amenity costs, our
financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.
22
Uninsured losses or losses in excess of our insurance coverage could adversely affect our
financial condition and our cash flow, and there are a limited number of insurers that will
underwrite coverage for resorts with indoor waterparks.
We maintain comprehensive liability, fire, flood (where appropriate) and extended coverage
insurance with respect to our resorts with policy specifications, limits and deductibles that we
believe are commercially reasonable for our operations and are available to businesses in our
industry. Certain types of losses, however, may be either uninsurable or not economically
insurable, such as losses due to earthquakes, riots, acts of war or terrorism. Should an uninsured
loss occur, we could lose both our investment in, and anticipated profits and cash flow from, a
resort. If any such loss is insured, we may be required to pay a significant deductible on any
claim for recovery of such a loss prior to our insurer being obligated to reimburse us for the loss
or the amount of the loss may exceed our coverage for the loss. In addition, we may not be able to
obtain insurance in the future at acceptable rates, or at all, and insurance may not be available
to us on favorable terms or at all, including insurance for the construction and development of our
resorts, especially since there are a limited number of insurance companies that underwrite
insurance for indoor waterparks.
We will be required to make certain capital expenditures to maintain the quality of our resorts,
which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Our resorts have an ongoing need for renovations and other capital improvements, including
periodic replacement of furniture, fixtures and equipment. The cost of such capital improvements
could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Such renovations
involve certain risks, including the possibility of environmental problems, construction cost
overruns and delays, the possibility that we will not have available cash to fund renovations or
that financing for renovations will not be available on favorable terms, if at all, uncertainties
as to market demand or deterioration in market demand after commencement of renovation and the
emergence of unanticipated competition from other entities. If we are unable to meet our capital
expenditure needs, we may not be able to maintain the quality of our resorts.
We may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property, which could harm the value of
our brands and adversely affect our business.
The success of our resorts depends in part on our brands, logos and branded merchandise. We
rely on a combination of trademarks, copyrights, service marks, trade secrets and similar
intellectual property rights to protect our brands, logos, branded merchandise and other
intellectual property. The success of our growth strategy depends on our continued ability to use
our existing trademarks and service marks in order to increase brand awareness and further develop
our brand in both domestic and international markets. We also use our trademarks and other
intellectual property on the Internet. If our efforts to protect our intellectual property are not
adequate, or if any third party misappropriates or infringes on our intellectual property, either
in print or on the Internet, the value of our brands may be harmed, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, including the failure of our brands, logos and branded merchandise
to achieve and maintain market acceptance.
We have licensed our Great Wolf Lodge brand and intend to further license the brand in
international markets. While we try to ensure that the quality of our brand is maintained by our
current licensee, and will be maintained by any future licensees, we cannot assure you that these
licensees will not take actions that adversely affect the value of our intellectual property or
reputation.
We have registered certain trademarks and have other trademark registrations pending in the
United States and foreign jurisdictions. There is no guarantee that our trademark registration
applications will be granted. In addition, the trademarks that we currently use have not been
registered in all of the countries in which we do, or intend to do, business and may never be
registered in all of these countries. We cannot assure you that we will be able to adequately
protect our trademarks or that our use of these trademarks will not result in liability for
trademark infringement, trademark dilution or unfair competition.
We cannot assure you that all of the steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property
in the United States and foreign countries will be adequate. In addition, the laws of some foreign
countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United
States.
Our operations may be adversely affected by extreme weather conditions and the impact of
disasters.
We currently operate, and in the future intend to operate, our resorts in a number of
different markets, each of which is subject to local weather patterns and their effects on our
resorts, especially our guests ability to travel to our resorts. Extreme weather conditions can
from time to time have an adverse impact upon individual resorts or particular regions. Our resorts
are also vulnerable to the effects of destructive forces, such as fire, storms, high winds and
flooding and any other occurrence that could affect the supply of
23
water or electricity to our resorts. Although our resorts are insured against property damage,
damages resulting from acts of God or otherwise may exceed the limits of our insurance coverage or
be outside the scope of that coverage.
Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and other governmental regulations and changes
in governmental rules and regulations may adversely affect our financial condition and results of
operations.
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or the ADA, all public accommodations are
required to meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. While
we believe that our resorts are substantially in compliance with these requirements, we have not
conducted an audit or investigation of all of our resorts to determine our compliance. A
determination that we are not in compliance with the ADA could result in the imposition of fines or
an award of damages to private litigants. We cannot predict the ultimate cost of compliance with
the ADA.
The resort industry is also subject to numerous federal, state and local governmental
regulations including those related to building and zoning requirements, and we are subject to laws
governing our relationship with our employees, including minimum wage requirements, overtime,
working conditions and work permit requirements. In addition, changes in governmental rules and
regulations or enforcement policies affecting the use and operation of our resorts, including
changes to building codes and fire and life safety codes, may occur. If we were required to make
substantial modifications at our resorts to comply with the ADA, other governmental regulations or
changes in governmental rules and regulations, our financial condition and results of operations
could be adversely affected.
We face possible liability for environmental cleanup costs and damages for contamination related
to our properties, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Our operations and properties are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations
relating to the protection of the environment, natural resources and worker health and safety,
including laws and regulations governing and creating liability relating to the management, storage
and disposal of hazardous substances and other regulated materials. Our properties are also subject
to various environmental laws and regulations that govern certain aspects of our on-going
operations. These laws and regulations control such things as the nature and volume of our
wastewater discharges, quality of our water supply and our waste management practices. The costs of
complying with these requirements, as they now exist or may be altered in the future, could
adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Because we own and operate real property, various federal, state and local laws may impose
liability on us for the costs of removing or remediating various hazardous substances, including
substances that may be currently unknown to us, that may have been released on or in our property
or disposed by us at third-party locations. The principal federal laws relating to environmental
contamination and associated liabilities that could affect us are the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act; state
and local governments have also adopted separate but similar environmental laws and regulations
that vary from state to state and locality to locality. These laws may impose liability jointly and
severally, without regard to fault and whether or not we knew of or caused the release. The
presence of hazardous substances on a property or the failure to meet environmental regulatory
requirements may materially adversely affect our ability to use or sell the property, or to use the
property as collateral for borrowing, and may cause us to incur substantial remediation or
compliance costs. In addition, if hazardous substances are located on or released from one of our
properties, we could incur substantial liabilities through a private party personal injury claim, a
claim by an adjacent property owner for property damage or a claim by a governmental entity for
other damages, such as natural resource damages. This liability may be imposed on us under
environmental laws or common-law principles.
We obtain environmental assessment reports on the properties we own or operate as we deem
appropriate. These reports have not revealed any environmental liability or compliance concerns
that we believe would materially adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
However, the environmental assessments that we have undertaken might not have revealed all
potential environmental liabilities or claims for such liabilities. It is also possible that future
laws, ordinances or regulations or changed interpretations of existing laws and regulations will
impose material environmental liability or compliance costs on us, that the current environmental
conditions of properties we own or operate will be affected by other properties in the vicinity or
by the actions of third parties unrelated to us or that our guests could introduce hazardous or
toxic substances into the resorts we own or manage without our knowledge and expose us to liability
under federal or state environmental laws. The costs of defending these claims, complying with as
yet unidentified requirements, conducting this environmental remediation or responding to such
changed conditions could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
24
Some of our resort properties may have contained, or are adjacent to or near other properties
that have contained or currently contain underground storage tanks for the storage of petroleum
products or other hazardous or toxic substances. If hazardous or toxic substances were released
from these tanks, we could incur significant costs or, with respect to tanks on our property, be
liable to third parties with respect to the releases.
On occasion, we may elect to develop properties that have had a history of industrial
activities and/or historical environmental contamination. Where such opportunities arise, we engage
third-party experts to evaluate the extent of contamination, the scope of any needed environmental
clean-up work, and available measures (such as creation of barriers over residual contamination and
deed restrictions prohibiting groundwater use or disturbance of the soil) for ensuring that planned
development and future property uses will not present unacceptable human health or environmental
risks or exposure to liabilities. If those environmental assessments indicate that the development
opportunities are acceptable, we also work with appropriate governmental agencies and obtain their
approvals of planned site clean-up, development activities and the proposed future property uses.
We have followed that process in connection with the development of our Blue Harbor Resort in
Sheboygan, Wisconsin where the City of Sheboygan has arranged for environmental clean-up work and
ongoing groundwater monitoring and we have agreed to the use of a barrier preventing contact with
residual contamination and implementation of a deed restriction limiting site activities. To our
knowledge, our work at our Sheboygan resort has been conducted in accordance with requirements
imposed by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Based on these efforts, we are not aware
of any environmental liability or compliance concerns at our Sheboygan resort that we believe would
materially adversely affect our financial conditions or results of operations. It is possible,
however, that our efforts have not identified all environmental conditions at the property or that
environmental conditions and liabilities associated with the property could change in the future.
Future acquisitions of properties subject to environmental requirements or affected by
environmental contamination could require us to incur substantial costs relating to such matters.
In addition, environmental laws, regulations, wetlands, endangered species and other land use and
natural resource issues affecting either currently owned properties or sites identified as possible
future acquisitions may increase costs associated with future site development and construction
activities or business or expansion opportunities, prevent, delay, alter or interfere with such
plans or otherwise adversely affect such plans.
Regulation of the marketing and sale of condominiums, including a prior offer of condominiums at
our Blue Harbor Resort, could adversely affect our business.
Our marketing and sales of condominium units are subject to extensive regulation by the
federal government and the states in which our condominiums are marketed and sold. On a federal
level, the Federal Trade Commission Act prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or competition in
interstate commerce. Other federal legislation to which we are or may be subject includes the
Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, the Real Estate Settlement Practices Act and the Fair
Housing Act. In addition, many states have adopted specific laws and regulations regarding the sale
of condominiums. For example, certain state laws grant the purchaser the right to cancel a contract
of purchase within a specified period following the earlier of the date the contract was signed or
the date the purchaser has received the last of the documents required to be provided by the
seller. No assurance can be given that the cost of qualifying under condominium regulations in all
jurisdictions in which we desire to conduct sales will not be significant. The failure to comply
with such laws or regulations could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
There can be no assurance that prior or future sales of our condominium units will not be
considered offers or sales of securities under federal law or the state law in the states where
we desire to, or do, conduct sales or in which our properties are located. If such interests were
considered to be securities, we would be required to comply with applicable state and federal
securities laws, including laws pertaining to registration or qualification of securities,
licensing of salespeople and other matters. There can be no assurance that we will be able to
comply with the applicable state and federal securities requirements, and if the offers or sales of
our condominium units are deemed to be offers or sales of securities, such a determination may
create liabilities or contingencies that could have an adverse effect on our operations, including
possible rescission rights relating to the units that have been sold, which, if exercised, could
result in losses and would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
In particular, it is possible that the prior offer of condominiums at our Sheboygan resort by
Blue Harbor Resort Condominium, LLC, a former subsidiary of Great Lakes that we refer to as Condo
LLC, may not have been in compliance with federal and state securities laws. Prior to the initial
public offering and the completion of the formation transactions, interests in Condo LLC held by
Great Lakes were distributed to Great Lakes shareholders. We did not acquire Condo LLC as a part
of the formation transactions. Although Condo LLC has taken steps to correct any potential
securities laws issues in connection with these offers, we cannot assure you that we would not be
held liable to some extent for the offers made by Condo LLC or that the indemnification obligations
of the Great Lakes principals to us would be sufficient to cover any such liabilities.
25
The illiquidity of real estate may make it difficult for us to dispose of one or more of our
resorts.
We may from time to time decide to dispose of one or more of our real estate assets. Because
real estate holdings generally, and family entertainment resorts like ours in particular, are
relatively illiquid, we may not be able to dispose of one or more real estate assets on a timely
basis or at a favorable price. The illiquidity of our real estate assets could mean that we
continue to operate a facility that management has identified for disposition. Failure to dispose
of a real estate asset in a timely fashion, or at all, could adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Risk Factors Related to Our Capital Structure
The covenants in our revolving credit facility and mortgage loan agreement impose significant
restrictions on us.
The terms of our revolving credit facility impose significant operating and financial
restrictions on us and our subsidiaries and require us to meet certain financial tests. These
restrictions could also have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of
operations by significantly limiting or prohibiting us from engaging in certain transactions,
including:
|
|
|
incurring or guaranteeing additional indebtedness; |
|
|
|
|
paying dividends or making distributions or certain other restricted payments; |
|
|
|
|
making capital expenditures and other investments; |
|
|
|
|
creating liens on our assets; |
|
|
|
|
issuing or selling capital stock of our subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
transferring or selling assets currently held by us; |
|
|
|
|
repurchasing stock and certain indebtedness; |
|
|
|
|
engaging in transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
|
entering into any agreements that restrict dividends from our subsidiaries; and |
|
|
|
|
engaging in mergers or consolidations. |
The failure to comply with any of these covenants could cause a default under our other debt
agreements. Furthermore, our revolving credit facility contains certain financial covenants,
including establishing a maximum leverage ratio and requiring us to maintain a minimum interest
coverage ratio, which, if not maintained by us, would cause us to be in default under the revolving
credit facility. Any of these defaults, if not waived, could result in the acceleration of all of
our debt, in which case the debt would become immediately due and payable. If this occurs, we may
not be able to repay our debt or borrow sufficient funds to refinance it.
We may not be able to obtain additional financing on favorable terms, if at all.
We expect that we will require additional financing over time, the amount of which will depend
on a number of factors, including the number of resorts we construct, additions to our current
resorts and the cash flow generated by our resorts. The terms of any additional financing we may be
able to procure are unknown at this time. Our access to third-party sources of capital depends, in
part, on:
|
|
|
general market conditions; |
|
|
|
|
the markets perception of our growth potential; |
|
|
|
|
our then-current debt levels; |
26
|
|
|
our then-current and expected future earnings; |
|
|
|
|
our cash flow; and |
|
|
|
|
the market price per share of our common stock. |
Any future debt financing or issuances of preferred stock that we may make will be senior to the
rights of holders of our common stock, and any future issuances of common stock will result in the
dilution of the then-existing stockholders proportionate equity interest.
Risk Factors Related to the Ownership of Our Company
Certain of our insiders exercise considerable influence over the company.
As
of the date of our original Form 10-K report, our executive officers and directors, as a group,
beneficially owned approximately 16.3% of the outstanding shares of our common stock (taking into
account the resignations of two of our executive officers effective March 31, 2005). By reason of
such holdings, these stockholders acting as a group will be able to exercise significant influence
over our affairs and policies, including the election of our board of directors and matters
submitted to a vote of our stockholders such as mergers and significant asset sales, and their
interests might not be consistent with the interests of other stockholders.
We may have assumed unknown liabilities in connection with the formation transactions.
As part of the formation transactions, we acquired our predecessor companies subject to
existing liabilities, some of which may have been unknown at the time of the closing thereof.
Unknown liabilities might include liabilities for cleanup or remediation of undisclosed
environmental conditions, claims of vendors or other persons dealing with the entities prior to the
closing of the formation transactions (that had not been asserted or threatened prior thereto), tax
liabilities and accrued but unpaid liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business. The
founding shareholders of our predecessor companies agreed to indemnify us with respect to claims
for breaches of representations and warranties brought by us within one year following the
completion of the IPO and the formation transactions, subject to certain limitations. Many
liabilities may not be identified within the one-year period and we may have no recourse against
the founding shareholders or these entities for such liabilities.
With respect to each founding shareholder, the maximum indemnification obligation under these
agreements will not exceed 35% of the value of the shares of our common stock received by that
founding shareholder in the formation transactions based on the IPO price of $17.00 per share. The
maximum amount of the indemnification obligations under these agreements equals approximately
$45,200 in the aggregate. To the extent required, these founding shareholders may fulfill the
indemnity obligations under the agreements solely through delivery of shares of common stock that
they own, valued at the time of delivery, or an equivalent amount of cash. However, if any of these
founding shareholders chooses to fulfill the indemnity obligation under the agreement through the
delivery of shares, the maximum number of shares such shareholder will be obligated to deliver is
35% of the number of shares such founding shareholder received in the formation transactions. As a
result, there may be a significant shortfall in relation to the actual costs incurred from the
indemnifiable event for which we will have no recourse against these founding shareholders. Three
of the founding shareholders received personal loans that are secured by a pledge of all the shares
of our common stock received by each such founding shareholder in the formation transactions.
Accordingly, as these shares may not be available to these founding shareholders, these founding
shareholders may be required to satisfy any indemnification obligations under these agreements in
cash. There is no assurance that the founding shareholders will have adequate cash resources to
satisfy their indemnification obligations under these agreements if necessary.
We may issue partnership interests in the future that may be dilutive to, and may have
preferential rights over, our common stockholders.
We have formed a wholly owned operating partnership to serve as the parent entity of each of
the surviving resort-owning entities. We are the limited partner of the partnership and the sole
general partner of the partnership is a new wholly owned subsidiary that we have formed for that
purpose. We formed the operating partnership to provide flexibility for future transactions as we
execute our growth strategy. We believe that the ability to issue partnership units will enable us
to acquire assets from sellers seeking certain tax treatment. While we do not anticipate issuing
any interests in the operating partnership in the foreseeable future, we may issue such interests
in the future. These additional interests may include preferred limited partnership units. Any
partnership interests that we issue may be entitled to distributions of available cash that might
otherwise be allocated to the execution of our business plan or
27
generally available for future dividends, if any. In addition, any partnership interests may
be convertible into our common stock, thus having a dilutive impact to our common stockholders, and
may have voting or other preferential rights relative to those of our common stockholders.
The sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause the market price of our
common stock to decline.
As
of the date of our original Form 10-K report, we had outstanding 30,262,308 shares of common
stock. Of these shares, the 16,100,000 shares sold in the IPO are freely tradable. The 14,032,896
shares issued in connection with our formation transactions were subject to lock-up provisions in
our bylaws that prohibited the sale of any of these shares until June 18, 2005, without the prior
written consent of our board of directors or chief executive officer. Subject to certain
restrictions, after the end of the lock-up period all of these shares
are freely tradable
pursuant to an effective Registration Statement previously filed under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended. If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of shares of common stock in the public
market, including the shares issued in connection with our formation transactions, or upon the
exercise of outstanding options, or if the market perceives that these sales could occur, the
market price of our common stock could decline. These sales also might make it more difficult for
us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem
appropriate, or to use equity as consideration for future acquisitions.
Provisions in our certificate of incorporation, bylaws, employment agreements and Delaware law
have anti-takeover effects that could prevent a change in control that could be beneficial to our
stockholders, which could depress the market price of our common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation, bylaws, employment agreements and Delaware corporate law
contain provisions that could delay, defer, increase the costs of or prevent a change in control of
us or our management that could be beneficial to our stockholders. These provisions could also
discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to elect
directors and take other corporate actions. As a result, these provisions could limit the price
that investors are willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. These provisions
might also discourage a potential acquisition proposal or tender offer, even if the acquisition
proposal or tender offer is at a price above the then current market price for our common stock.
These provisions:
|
|
|
authorize our board of directors to issue blank check preferred stock and determine the
powers, preferences and privileges of those shares without prior stockholder approval; |
|
|
|
|
prohibit the right of our stockholders to act by written consent; |
|
|
|
|
limit the calling of special meetings of stockholders; |
|
|
|
|
impose a requirement that holders of 50% of the outstanding shares of common stock are
required to amend the provisions relating to actions by written consent of stockholders and
the limitations of calling special meetings; and |
|
|
|
|
provide for payments to certain of our executive officers upon termination of employment
within certain time periods before or after a change of control. |
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain information included in this Form 10-K/A report contains, and other materials filed or
to be filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, contain or will contain,
forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, including,
among others, statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy, projected
levels of growth, projected costs and projected financing needs, are forward-looking statements.
Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of Great
Wolf Resorts, Inc. and members of our management team, as well as the assumptions on which such
statements are based, and generally are identified by the use of words such as may, will,
seeks, anticipates, believes, estimates, expects, plans, intends, should or similar
expressions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks
and uncertainties that actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such
forward-looking statements. Important factors currently known to our management that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include those set
forth above under the section entitled Risk Factors.
We believe these forward-looking statements are reasonable; however, undue reliance should not
be placed on any forward-looking statements, which are based on current expectations. All written
and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are
qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Further, forward-looking statements
speak
28
only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise
forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events
or changes to future operating results over time unless required by law.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We have five family entertainment resorts that are currently operating and two additional
resorts that are under construction. Information on our properties is as follows:
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of Wisconsin Dells, is located on 25 acres in Wisconsin Dells,
Wisconsin, all of which have been developed or are under development. |
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of Sandusky, is located on 15 acres in Sandusky, Ohio, all of which have
been developed. |
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of Traverse City, Michigan, is located on 48 acres in Traverse City,
Michigan, of which 22 acres have been developed and 26 acres remain available for future
expansion. |
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of Kansas City, is located on 17 acres in Kansas City, Kansas, all of which have been developed. |
|
|
|
|
Blue Harbor Resort of Sheboygan, is located on 12 acres in Sheboygan, Wisconsin, all of which have been developed. |
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of Williamsburg, is located on 83 acres in Williamsburg, Virginia, of
which 36 acres are being developed and 47 acres remain available for future expansion. |
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of the Pocono Mountains, is located on 95 acres in Pocono Township, near
Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, of which 45 acres are being developed and 50 acres remain
available for future expansion. |
For additional information regarding our resort properties see Item 1. Business Operating
Properties and Item 1. Business Properties Under Construction above.
In addition, we lease approximately 13,800 square feet of office space for our corporate
offices and approximately 2,500 square feet of office space for our central reservations call
center operations in Madison, Wisconsin. We also lease approximately 3,800 square feet of office
space in Falls Church, Virginia. We believe these facilities are adequate for our current needs.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are party to various legal actions in the ordinary course of our business. We believe that
these actions are routine in nature and incidental to the operation of our business. While the
outcome of these actions cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe that the ultimate
resolution of these matters will not have a material, adverse impact on our business, financial
condition or prospects.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of our stockholders during the period December 15, 2004
(the date we began trading as a public company) through December 31, 2004.
29
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
In conjunction with the completion of our IPO, our common shares began trading on Nasdaq
National Market under the symbol WOLF. As of December 31, 2004, there were 507 record holders of
our common stock. The following table sets forth the high and low closing prices for Great Wolf
Resorts Common Stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
December 15, 2004 through December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
23.00 |
|
|
$ |
18.65 |
|
January 1, 2005 through March 16, 2005 |
|
$ |
25.49 |
|
|
$ |
20.07 |
|
As of March 1, 2005, there were 516 record holders of our common stock. The closing price of
our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market on March 16, 2005, was $23.95.
In connection with our formation transactions, we issued common stock to certain holders of
securities, who, among other things, have certified to us as to their status as accredited
investors, in each of GLC and its resort related subsidiaries, in an offering exempt from
registration under the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2) and Rule 506 of Regulation D. In
total, we issued an aggregate of 13,901,947 shares of our common stock to such investors. In
exchange, we received all or a portion of each such investors interest in either GLC or the
applicable resort related GLC subsidiary and such entities became wholly owned subsidiaries of our
company.
Also in connection with our formation transactions, we issued (1) 64,038 shares of our common
stock to the holder of a tenant in common interest in our Poconos resort and (2) 67,516 shares of
our common stock to the holder of a tenant in common interest in our Willimsburg resort. These
shares were issued in offerings exempt from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to
Section 4(2) and Rulte 506 of Regulation D.
In addition, we issued 100 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, to GLC upon our
formation on May 10, 2004. We received an aggregate of $1,000 in cash in exchange for these shares.
We redeemed these shares in connection with the formation transactions. This issuance was exempt
from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
The issuances described above were exempt from registration under the Securities Act, pursuant
to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated there under as a transaction by
an issuer not involving a public offering. Each investor receiving shares in the formation
transactions was an accredited investor, with knowledge and experience in financial and business
matters sufficient for evaluating the associated merits and risks, has represented its intention to
acquire the securities for investment purposes only and not with a view towards distribution and
received or had access to adequate information about us. Appropriate legends were affixed to the
stock certificates in connection with these transactions and there was no general solicitation or
advertising.
Use of Proceeds from the IPO
On December 20, 2004, we closed our IPO. The shares of common stock sold in our IPO were
registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on a Registration Statement (Registration
No. 333-118148) on Form S-1 that was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission
on December 14, 2004. All 16,100,000 shares of common stock registered under such Registration
Statement were sold at a price to the public of $17.00 per share, generating gross proceeds of
$273,700. The net proceeds to us were approximately $248,700 after deducting an aggregate of
$19,200 in underwriting discounts and commissions paid to the underwriters and $5,800 in other
expenses incurred in connection with our IPO. The managing underwriter for the IPO was Citigroup
Global Markets, Inc.
The net proceeds from our IPO were used to pay an aggregate of $97,600 of the cash
consideration in connection with the formation transactions; repay certain indebtedness in the
aggregate amount of approximately $75,700; and fund $75,400 of our future resort development costs.
In addition, upon the closing of our IPO, two of our resorts refinanced existing mortgage
indebtedness with a total outstanding debt of $72,300, and our operating partnership entered into a
$75,000 revolving credit facility secured by two of our resorts. As of March 1, 2005, based on the
financial and debt service rations contained in the revolving credit facility, approximately
$50,000 of the facility is available for borrowing.
30
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock, and we do not
anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We are prohibited from paying cash
dividends under covenants contained in the credit facility. We currently intend to retain our
earnings, if any, for future growth. Future dividends on our common stock, if any, will be at the
discretion of our board of directors and will depend on, among other things, our operations,
capital requirements and surplus, general financial condition, contractual restrictions and such
other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial and operating data on a
historical basis for Great Wolf Resorts, and on a combined historical basis for Great Lakes
Predecessor (the Predecessor). The Predecessor was the predecessor accounting entity to Great Wolf
Resorts. We have not presented historical information for Great Wolf Resorts prior to December 20,
2004, the date on which we closed the IPO, because we did not have any material corporate operating
activity during the period from our formation until the closing of the IPO.
Great Lakes Predecessor Financial Information
The Predecessors combined historical financial information included the following:
|
|
|
The Great Lakes Companies, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including development
of, ownership interests in, and management contracts with respect to, resorts and certain
non-resort hotels and multifamily housing development and management assets; |
|
|
|
|
the entities that owned our Traverse City, Kansas City and Sheboygan operating resorts; and |
|
|
|
|
the entities that owned our Williamsburg and Pocono Mountains resorts that are under construction. |
The Traverse City, Kansas City and Sheboygan resorts opened in March 2003, May 2003 and June
2004, respectively. Therefore, the Predecessors historical results of operations only reflected
operating results for the Traverse City, Kansas City and Sheboygan resorts for those periods after
the resort opening dates, and only through the closing of the IPO (that is, through December 20,
2004).
The Predecessors financial statements did not include the entities that owned the Wisconsin
Dells and Sandusky operating resorts as those entities were controlled by affiliates of AIG
SunAmerica.
Great Wolf Resorts Financial Information
Great Wolf Resorts financial information includes:
|
|
|
our corporate entity that provides resort development and management services; |
|
|
|
|
our Wisconsin Dells, Sandusky, Traverse City, Kansas City and Sheboygan operating resorts; and |
|
|
|
|
our Williamsburg and Pocono Mountains resorts that are under construction. |
31
The following data should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes
thereto and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
included elsewhere in this Form 10-K/A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 21, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004- |
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2004- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
December 20, |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
Great Wolf |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
Resorts |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Statement of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooms |
|
$ |
3,261 |
|
|
$ |
31,438 |
|
|
$ |
18,801 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Food, beverage and other |
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
16,110 |
|
|
|
9,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
|
|
Management and other fees |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
3,109 |
|
|
|
3,329 |
|
|
|
3,022 |
|
|
|
4,070 |
|
Other revenue from managed properties(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,553 |
|
|
|
14,904 |
|
|
|
14,889 |
|
|
|
13,286 |
|
|
|
9,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
4,629 |
|
|
|
65,258 |
|
|
|
46,253 |
|
|
|
18,218 |
|
|
|
16,620 |
|
|
|
13,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Departmental expenses Rooms |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
4,917 |
|
|
|
3,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food, beverage and other |
|
|
958 |
|
|
|
13,678 |
|
|
|
8,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
7,372 |
|
|
|
18,613 |
|
|
|
11,376 |
|
|
|
4,159 |
|
|
|
3,853 |
|
|
|
5,168 |
|
Property operating costs |
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
8,810 |
|
|
|
5,283 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,897 |
|
|
|
12,925 |
|
|
|
7,744 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Other expenses from managed properties(1). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,553 |
|
|
|
14,904 |
|
|
|
14,808 |
|
|
|
13,286 |
|
|
|
9,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
10,820 |
|
|
|
73,496 |
|
|
|
51,152 |
|
|
|
19,810 |
|
|
|
17,212 |
|
|
|
14,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(6,191 |
) |
|
|
(8,238 |
) |
|
|
(4,899 |
) |
|
|
(1,592 |
) |
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
(1,149 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(224 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
6,748 |
|
|
|
4,413 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
(Gain) loss on sale of investments and
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Interest on mandatorily redeemable shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
(3,136 |
) |
|
|
4,479 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(6,405 |
) |
|
|
(14,870 |
) |
|
|
(6,121 |
) |
|
|
(6,213 |
) |
|
|
(1,176 |
) |
|
|
(1,718 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(2,563 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(3,842 |
) |
|
|
(14,870 |
) |
|
|
(6,121 |
) |
|
|
(6,213 |
) |
|
|
(1,176 |
) |
|
|
(1,718 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,928 |
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
|
(542 |
) |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
(1,037 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle |
|
|
(3,842 |
) |
|
|
(12,942 |
) |
|
|
(5,003 |
) |
|
|
(6,755 |
) |
|
|
(844 |
) |
|
|
(2,755 |
) |
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(3,842 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,942 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,543 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,755 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,177 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,755 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
30,132,896 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
30,132,896 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
activities(4) |
|
$ |
762 |
|
|
|
3,637 |
|
|
$ |
8,126 |
|
|
$ |
376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing
activities(4) |
|
|
(97,583 |
) |
|
|
(64,472 |
) |
|
|
(64,280 |
) |
|
|
(46,276 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
activities |
|
|
172,151 |
|
|
|
61,424 |
|
|
|
54,854 |
|
|
|
49,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (end of period): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets(4) |
|
$ |
622,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
173,494 |
|
|
$ |
106,751 |
|
|
$ |
54,191 |
|
|
$ |
51,342 |
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
142,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
93,733 |
|
|
$ |
37,710 |
|
|
$ |
9,466 |
|
|
$ |
5,679 |
|
Long-term debt secured by assets
of spun-off entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,108 |
|
|
|
5,054 |
|
|
|
5,177 |
|
|
|
5,100 |
|
Long-term debt secured by assets held
for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,220 |
|
|
$ |
31,564 |
|
|
$ |
34,193 |
|
|
$ |
33,084 |
|
Non-GAAP financial measures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
(4,294 |
)(3) |
|
$ |
7,559 |
(3) |
|
$ |
12,439 |
(3) |
|
$ |
334 |
(3) |
|
$ |
6,287 |
|
|
$ |
431 |
|
32
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects reimbursement of payroll, benefits and costs related to the operations of properties
managed by the Predecessor. |
|
(2) |
|
We currently have 30,262,308 shares of our common stock outstanding. Included in that total
are 129,412 shares held in a trust that holds the assets to pay obligations under our deferred
compensation plan. Under applicable accounting rules, the shares of common stock held in that
trust are treated as treasury stock for purposes of our earnings per share computations and
are therefore excluded from the basic and diluted earnings per share calculations. |
|
(3) |
|
See reconciliation to net income (loss) in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation Non-GAAP Financial Measures. |
|
(4) |
|
As restated see Note 15 to consolidated financial statements. |
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
As
described in Note 15 to the consolidated and combined
financial statements, subsequent to the issuance of the
consolidated and combined financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2004, we determined that it was necessary to restate
our previously issued financial statements for changes in our
application of purchase accounting for certain transaction entered
into in December 2004. Due to errors in the application of purchase
accounting for those transactions, and due to other reclassifications
of assets, we have recorded adjustments (the Adjustments) to restate
the previously issued financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The Adjustments result primarily from the
application of Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issues No. 98-3
and No. 04-1 with regard to our recording of our formation
transactions in December 2004. We recorded the formation transactions
by applying the purchase method of accounting in connection with the
acquisition of seven resort-owning entities. This accounting was
presented in our filings with the SEC for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and
June 30, 2005. The Adjustments had the effect of decreasing our cash and cash equivalents by $2.0 million,
increasing condominiums under development by $2.4 million,
increasing other current assets by $2.0 million, increasing
property and equipment by $71.6 million, increasing other
intangible assets by $19.1 million, decreasing goodwill by
$63.5 million, and increasing deferred tax liability by
$29.6 million as of December 31, 2004, and decreasing net
cash provided by operating activities by $2.4 million and
decreasing net cash used in investing activities by $0.4 million
for the year ended December 31, 2004. The Adjustments had no
impact on net income as previously reported for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes
thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. Where appropriate, the following discussion includes
analysis of the effects of our IPO, the formation transactions and related refinancing transactions
and certain other transactions. We make statements in this section that are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. For a complete discussion of
forward-looking statements, see the section in Item 1 of this Form 10-K/A report entitled
Forward-Looking Statements. Certain risk factors may cause our actual results, performance or
achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the following discussion. For
a discussion of such risk factors, see the sections in Item 1 of this Form 10-K/A report entitled
Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Statements. All dollar amounts in this discussion, except for
per share data and operating statistics, are in thousands.
Overview
Formation. The terms Great Wolf Resorts, us, we and our are used in this report refer
to Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. Through our controlling interest in Great Wolf Resort Operating
Partnership, L.L.L.P., or the Operating Partnership, of which we are the sole general partner,
and the subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership, we develop, own and operate family entertainment
resorts.
We were formed to succeed to certain businesses of the Great Lakes Predecessor (the
Predecessor), which was not a legal entity but rather a combination of numerous entities. The
Predecessor consisted of the following, all of which were under common management:
|
|
|
The Great Lakes Companies, Inc. (GLC) and its consolidated subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of Traverse City, LLC; |
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of Kansas City, LLC; |
|
|
|
|
Blue Harbor Resort Sheboygan, LLC; |
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of Williamsburg, LLC; and |
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of the Poconos, LLC |
The Predecessor financial statements did not include entities that owned Great Wolf Lodges in
Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin and Sandusky, Ohio. These entities, although they were managed by GLC,
were controlled by affiliates of AIG SunAmerica, Inc.
The Predecessor developed and operated hotels since 1995. In 1999, the Predecessor began its
resort operations by purchasing the Great Wolf Lodge in Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin and developing
the Great Wolf Lodge in Sandusky, Ohio, which opened in 2001. In 2003, the Predecessor opened two
additional Great Wolf Lodge resorts, one in Traverse City, Michigan and the other in Kansas City,
Kansas. In June 2004, the Predecessor opened the Blue Harbor Resort in Sheboygan, Wisconsin.
Subsequently, the Predecessor had two additional Great Wolf Lodge resorts under construction, one
in Williamsburg, Virginia and the other in the Pocono Mountains
33
region of Pennsylvania, and had licensed a resort owned by a third party that was under
construction in Niagara Falls, Ontario (Canada).
We were incorporated in May 2004 as a Delaware corporation in anticipation of our initial
public offering of common stock (the IPO). The IPO closed on December 20, 2004, concurrently with
the completion of various formation transactions (the Formation Transactions).
Pursuant to the Formation Transactions:
|
|
|
The Predecessor contributed its hotel management and multifamily housing management and
development assets, which were unrelated to the resort business, to two subsidiaries of the
Predecessor and then distributed the interests in those subsidiaries to the former
shareholders of the Predecessor. |
|
|
|
|
We effected, through our Operating Partnership, the acquisition of GLC and each
resort-owning entity. Pursuant to these acquisitions, investors of GLC and the resort-owning
entities received cash, unregistered shares of our common stock or a combination of cash and
unregistered shares of our common stock. We issued 13,901,947 shares of our common stock and
paid approximately $97,600 in cash in connection with these acquisitions. |
|
|
|
|
We issued an aggregate of 130,949 shares of unregistered common stock to holders of
tenant in common interests in two of our resorts. |
These
transactions consolidated the ownership of our resort properties and
property interests into
Great Wolf Resorts. During the period from our formation until we commenced operations upon closing
of our IPO on December 20, 2004, we did not have any material corporate activity.
The IPO consisted of the sale of 16,100,000 shares of common stock at a price per share of
$17.00, generating gross proceeds of $273,700. The net proceeds to us were approximately $248,700
after deducting an aggregate of $19,200 in underwriting discounts and commissions paid to the
underwriters and $5,800 in other expenses incurred in connection with the IPO.
As of December 31, 2004, we develop, own and operate four Great Wolf Lodge resorts, our
signature northwoods-themed resorts, and one Blue Harbor Resort, a nautical-themed property. In
addition, we own two Great Wolf Lodge resorts that are under construction and scheduled to open for
business during 2005. We are also the licensor and manager of an additional Great Wolf Lodge resort
in Niagara Falls, Ontario that is owned and under development by an affiliate of Ripley
Entertainment Inc., or Ripleys.
Business. We are a family entertainment resort company that provides our guests with a
high-quality vacation at an affordable price. We are the largest owner, operator and developer in
the United States of drive-to family resorts featuring indoor waterparks and other family-oriented
entertainment activities. We provide a full-service entertainment resort experience to our target
customer base: families with children ranging in ages from 2 to 14 years old that live within a
convenient driving distance from our resorts. Our resorts are open year-round and provide a
consistent and comfortable environment where our guests can enjoy our various amenities and
activities.
We provide our guests with a self-contained vacation experience and focus on capturing a
significant portion of their total vacation spending. We earn revenues through the sale of rooms,
which includes admission to our indoor waterpark, and other revenue-generating resort amenities.
Each of our resorts features a combination of the following revenue-generating amenities: themed
restaurants, an ice cream shop and confectionery, full-service spa, game arcade, gift shop and
meeting space. We also expect to generate revenues from licensing arrangements, management fees and
construction fees with respect to properties owned by third parties, such as the licensing
agreement we have entered into and management arrangement we have agreed to enter into with
Ripleys in connection with the Niagara Falls, Ontario resort.
34
The following table presents an overview of our portfolio of operating resorts and resorts
under construction (including the Niagara resort that will be owned by a third party licensee):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indoor |
|
|
Opened/Target |
|
|
|
|
|
Entertainment |
Location |
|
Opening |
|
Rooms |
|
Area(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Approx. ft(2)) |
Existing Resorts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin Dells, WI |
|
May 1997(2) |
|
|
309 |
(3) |
|
|
64,000 |
|
Sandusky, OH(4) |
|
March 2001 |
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
41,000 |
|
Traverse City, MI |
|
March 2003 |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
51,000 |
|
Kansas City, KS |
|
May 2003 |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
49,000 |
|
Sheboygan, WI(5) |
|
June 2004 |
|
|
183 |
(6) |
|
|
54,000 |
|
Resorts Under Construction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Williamsburg, VA |
|
March 2005 |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
66,000 |
|
Pocono Mountains, PA |
|
Fall 2005 |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
91,000 |
|
Niagara Falls, ONT(7) |
|
Spring 2006 |
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
94,000 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our indoor entertainment areas generally include our indoor waterpark, game arcade,
childrens activity room and fitness room, as well as our Aveda concept spa, 3D virtual
reality theatre, Wileys Woods and party room in the resorts that have such amenities. |
|
(2) |
|
We purchased this property in November 1999. |
|
(3) |
|
Our Wisconsin Dells property also features 77 condominium units currently under construction. |
|
(4) |
|
Prior to May 2004, we operated this resort as a Great Bear Lodge. |
|
(5) |
|
Our Sheboygan property is branded as a Blue Harbor Resort. This resort is subject to a
98-year and 11-month ground lease with the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Sheboygan. |
|
(6) |
|
Our Sheboygan resort includes an additional 64 individually owned two and four bedroom
condominium units. |
|
(7) |
|
Ripleys, our licensee, owns this resort. We are assisting Ripleys with construction
management and other pre-opening matters related to the Great Wolf Lodge in Niagara Falls. We
have granted Ripleys a license to use the Great Wolf Lodge name for this resort and other
intellectual property for ten years after opening. We have agreed to enter into a management
agreement, pursuant to which we expect to operate the resort on behalf of Ripleys for five
years, and a central reservations agreement. In conjunction with this project, we expect to
receive a one-time construction fee and ongoing license, central reservation and management
fees. |
Industry Trends and Outlook. While no standard industry definition for a family entertainment
resort featuring an indoor waterpark has developed, we generally consider resorts with at least 200
rooms featuring indoor waterparks larger than 25,000 square feet, as well as a variety of water
slides and other water-based attractions, to be competitive with our resorts. The concept of a
family entertainment resort with an indoor waterpark was first introduced in Wisconsin Dells,
Wisconsin and has evolved there over the past 15 years. We believe those resorts have historically
outperformed standard hotels in that market. We believe that the rate premiums and increased market
share in Wisconsin Dells have been significant and that no other operator or developer other than
Great Wolf Resorts has established a regional portfolio of family entertainment resorts featuring
indoor waterparks. We intend to continue to expand our portfolio of owned resorts throughout the
United States and to selectively seek licensing and management opportunities domestically and
internationally. The resorts we are currently constructing and plan to develop in the future
require significant industry knowledge and substantial capital resources. We believe that a number
of other resort operators are developing or considering the development of family entertainment
resorts that will compete directly with our resorts. In particular, one of our current competitors
is constructing a resort in Sandusky and another competitor is constructing a resort near Traverse
City.
We believe there are characteristics of the domestic travel and leisure industry that indicate
families favor frequent, short, drive-to vacations. According to the Travel Industry Association of
America, or TIA, from 1994 to 2003 the number of domestic leisure trips taken by families grew from
approximately 96 million trips in 1994 to 154 million trips in 2003. In 2003, approximately 45% of
leisure trips lasted one to two nights. The primary mode of transportation for 77% of the overnight
leisure trips in 2003 was by automobile. We believe these statistics provide evidence that our
segment of the travel and leisure industry has strong demand characteristics that make our family
entertainment resorts attractive to leisure travelers.
35
Our primary business objective is to increase long-term stockholder value. We believe we can
increase stockholder value by executing our internal and external growth strategies. Our primary
internal growth strategies are to: maximize total resort revenue; minimize costs by leveraging our
economies of scale; and build upon our existing brand awareness and loyalty in order to compete
more effectively. Our primary external growth strategies are to: capitalize on our first-mover
advantage by being the first to develop and operate family entertainment resorts featuring indoor
waterparks in our selected target markets; focus on development and strategic growth opportunities
by seeking to develop and open at least two new owned resorts in target markets each year for the
next several years and target selected licensing opportunities; and continue to innovate by
leveraging our in-house expertise, in conjunction with the knowledge and experience of our
third-party suppliers and designers.
In attempting to execute our internal and external growth strategies, we are subject to a
variety of business challenges and risks. These challenges include: development and licensing of
properties; increases in costs of constructing, operating and maintaining our resorts; competition
from other entertainment companies, both within and outside our industry segment; and external
economic risks, including family vacation patterns and trends. We seek to meet these challenges by
providing sufficient management oversight to site selection, development and resort operations,
concentrating on growing and strengthening awareness of our brand and demand for our resorts, and
maintaining our focus on safety.
Revenue and Key Performance Indicators. We seek to generate positive cash flows and net
income from each of our owned resorts. Our rooms revenue represents sales to guests of room nights
at our resorts, and is the largest contributor to our cash flows and profitability. Rooms revenue
accounted for approximately 67% of our total resort revenue for the year ended December 31, 2004.
We employ sales and marketing efforts to increase overall demand for rooms at our resorts. We seek
to optimize the relationship between room rates and occupancies through the use of yield management
techniques that attempt to project demand in order to selectively increase room rates during peak
demand. These techniques are designed to assist us in managing our higher occupancy nights to
achieve maximum rooms revenue, and include such practices as: monitoring our historical trends for
occupancy and estimating our high occupancy nights; offering the highest discounts to previous
guests in off-peak periods to build customer loyalty and enhance our ability to charge higher rates
in peak periods; structuring rates to allow us to offer our previous guests the best rate while
simultaneously working with a promotional partner or offering internet specials; monitoring sales
of room types daily to evaluate the effectiveness of offered discounts; and offering specials on
standard suites and yielding better rates on larger suites when standard suites sell out. In
addition, we seek to maximize the amount of time and money spent on-site by our guests by providing
a variety of revenue-generating amenities.
We have several key indicators that we use to evaluate the performance of our business. These
indicators include the following:
|
|
|
occupancy; |
|
|
|
|
average daily room rate, or ADR; |
|
|
|
|
revenue per available room, or RevPAR; |
|
|
|
|
total revenue per available room, or Total RevPAR; |
|
|
|
|
total revenue per occupied room, or Total RevPOR; and |
|
|
|
|
EBITDA. |
Occupancy, ADR and RevPAR are commonly used measures within the hospitality industry to
evaluate hotel operations and are defined as follows:
|
|
|
Occupancy is calculated by dividing total occupied rooms by total available rooms. |
|
|
|
|
ADR is calculated by dividing total rooms revenue by total occupied rooms. |
|
|
|
|
RevPAR is the product of occupancy and ADR. |
Occupancy allows us to measure the general overall demand for rooms at our resorts and the
effectiveness of our sales and marketing strategies. ADR allows us to measure the effectiveness of
our yield management strategies. ADR and RevPAR only include
36
rooms revenue. Total RevPOR and Total RevPAR include both rooms revenue and other revenue
derived from food and beverage and other amenities at our resorts. We consider Total RevPOR and
Total RevPAR to be key performance indicators for our business because we derive a significant
portion of our revenue from food and beverage and other amenities. For the year ended December 31,
2004, approximately 33% of our total resort revenues consisted of non-rooms revenue.
We use RevPAR and Total RevPAR to evaluate the blended effect that changes in occupancy, ADR
and Total RevPOR have on our profitability. We focus on increasing ADR and Total RevPOR because
those increases can have the greatest positive impact on our profitability. In addition, we seek to
maximize occupancy, as increases in occupancy generally lead to greater total revenues at our
resorts, and maintaining certain occupancy levels is key to covering our fixed costs. Increases in
total revenues as a result of higher occupancy are, however, typically accompanied by additional
incremental costs (including housekeeping services, utilities and room amenity costs). In contrast,
increases in total revenues from higher ADR and Total RevPOR are typically accompanied by lower
incremental costs, and result in a greater increase in profitability.
We also use EBITDA as a measure of the operating performance of each of our resorts. EBITDA is
a supplemental financial measure, and is not defined by accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America, or GAAP. See Non-GAAP Financial Measures for further discussion of
our use of EBITDA and a reconciliation to net income.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements and our financial reporting process
involve the use of accounting estimates based on our current judgments. Certain accounting
estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to our consolidated financial
statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ from our
current judgments.
Investments in Property and Equipment. We record investments in property and equipment at
cost. Improvements and replacements are capitalized when they extend the useful life, increase
capacity or improve the efficiency of the asset. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as
incurred.
Depreciation and amortization are recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful
lives of the assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
40 years |
Land improvements |
|
15 years |
Fixtures and equipment, including waterpark equipment |
|
3-10 years |
We are required to make subjective assessments as to these useful lives for purposes of
determining the amount of depreciation and amortization to record annually with respect to our
investments in property and equipment. These assessments have a direct impact on our net income
because if we were to shorten the expected useful lives of our investments in property and
equipment we would depreciate and amortize such investments over fewer years, resulting in more
depreciation and amortization expense and lower net income on an annual basis. We periodically
review the estimated useful lives we have assigned to our depreciable assets to determine whether
those useful lives are reasonable and appropriate.
When circumstances, such as adverse market conditions, indicate the carrying values of a
long-lived asset may be impaired, we perform an analysis to review the recoverability of the
assets carrying value. We make estimates of the undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest
charges) from the expected future operations of the asset. These estimates consider factors such as
expected future operating income, operating trends and prospects, as well as the effects of demand,
competition and other factors. If the analysis indicates that the carrying value is not recoverable
from future cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying value
exceeds the estimated fair value. Any impairment losses are recorded as operating expenses, which
reduce net income.
We are required to make subjective assessments as to the fair value of assets and liabilities
in connection with purchase accounting adjustments recorded related to real estate we acquire,
including the resorts acquired through the Formation Transactions which are accounted for by the
purchase method of accounting. Purchase accounting requires allocation of the acquisition value
among the property and equipment and identifiable intangible assets acquired.
Carrying Value of Goodwill. As a result of the Formation Transactions, we recorded
approximately $155,196 of goodwill on our consolidated balance sheet. On an annual basis, we
perform an analysis to determine any impairment of the carrying value of goodwill. To test goodwill
for impairment, we analyze the fair value of the individual resort to which the goodwill is
assigned to the
37
carrying value of that resort. If the analysis indicates that the carrying value is less than
the fair value of the individual resort, we compare the implied fair value of the resorts goodwill
with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The implied fair value of the goodwill is determined by
allocating the fair value of the individual resort to all the assets and liabilities of that resort
as if it had been acquired in a business combination. The excess of the fair value of the
individual resort over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value
of the goodwill. If the implied fair value of the goodwill is less than the carrying value, an
impairment loss is recognized. Any impairment losses are recorded as operating expenses, which
reduce net income.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123R), that requires companies to expense the value of employee stock options, discounts on
employee stock purchase plans and the similar awards. Under SFAS 123R, share-abased payment awards
result in compensation expense that will be measured at fair value on the awards grant date, based
on the estimated number of awards that are expected to vest. SFAS 123R is effective for periods
beginning after July 1, 2005, and applies to all outstanding and unvested share-based payment
awards at the adoption date. We have not completed our evaluation of the impact of adopting SFAS
124R.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We use EBITDA as a measure of our operating performance. EBITDA is a supplemental non-GAAP
financial measure. EBITDA is commonly defined as net income plus (a) interest expense, (b) income
taxes and (c) depreciation and amortization.
EBITDA as calculated by us is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures
presented by other companies. In addition, EBITDA (a) does not represent net income or cash flows
from operations as defined by GAAP; (b) is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund our
cash flow needs; and (c) should not be considered as an alternative to net income, operating
income, cash flows from operating activities or our other financial information as determined under
GAAP.
We believe EBITDA is useful to an investor in evaluating our operating performance because:
|
|
|
a significant portion of our assets consists of property and equipment that are
depreciated over their remaining useful lives in accordance with GAAP. Because depreciation
and amortization are non-cash items, we believe that presentation of EBITDA is a useful
measure of our operating performance; |
|
|
|
|
it is widely used in the hospitality and entertainment industries to measure operating
performance without regard to items such as depreciation and amortization; and |
|
|
|
|
we believe it helps investors meaningfully evaluate and compare the results of our
operations from period to period by removing the impact of items directly resulting from our
asset base, primarily depreciation and amortization, from our operating results. |
Our management uses EBITDA:
|
|
|
as a measurement of operating performance because it assists us in comparing our
operating performance on a consistent basis as it removes the impact of items directly
resulting from our asset base, primarily depreciation and amortization, from our operating
results; |
|
|
|
|
for planning purposes, including the preparation of our annual operating budget; |
|
|
|
|
as a valuation measure for evaluating our operating performance and our capacity to incur
and service debt, fund capital expenditures and expand our business; and |
|
|
|
|
as one measure in determining the value of other acquisitions and dispositions. |
Covenants in our revolving credit facility also require us to meet financial tests based upon
EBITDA as adjusted for certain items.
Using a measure such as EBITDA has material limitations. These limitations include the
difficulty associated with comparing results among companies and the inability to analyze certain
significant items, including depreciation and interest expense, which
38
directly affect our net income or loss. Management compensates for these limitations by
considering the economic effect of the excluded expense items independently, as well as in
connection with its analysis of net income.
The tables shown below reconcile net loss to EBITDA for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resorts |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 21, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
through |
|
|
through |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 20, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(3,842 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,942 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,543 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,755 |
) |
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
7,394 |
|
|
|
6,542 |
|
|
|
2,920 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(2,563 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,897 |
|
|
|
13,107 |
|
|
|
10,440 |
|
|
|
4,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
(4,294 |
) |
|
$ |
7,559 |
|
|
$ |
12,439 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations
General
Our and the Predecessors results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003
are not directly comparable due primarily to the impact of the IPO and the Formation Transactions,
our new debt and the repayment of debt upon the consummation of the IPO. To facilitate a meaningful
analysis of the results of operations, amounts for the year ended December 31, 2004, are labeled as
Company and include both the historical operations of the Predecessor in 2004 (for the period
January 1, 2004 through December 20, 2004) and our operations since the IPO (for the period
December 21, 2004 through December 31, 2004). The Company results are compared to Predecessor
results from prior years. The Predecessor results were combined with our results in 2004 because we
believe that a discussion of our results for the eleven-day period from December 21, 2004 through
December 31, 2004 would not be meaningful.
Great Lakes Predecessor Financial Information
The Predecessor combined historical financial information included the following:
|
|
|
The Great Lakes Companies, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including development
of, ownership interests in, and management contracts with respect to, resorts and certain
non-resort hotels and multifamily housing development and management assets; |
|
|
|
|
the entities that owned our Traverse City, Kansas City and Sheboygan operating resorts; and |
|
|
|
|
the entities that owned our Williamsburg and Pocono Mountains resorts that are under construction. |
The Traverse City, Kansas City and Sheboygan resorts opened in March 2003, May 2003 and June
2004, respectively. Therefore, Predecessors historical results of operations only reflected
operating results for Traverse City, Kansas City and Sheboygan for those periods after the resort
opening dates.
The Predecessors financial information did not include the entities that own the Wisconsin
Dells and Sandusky operating resorts as those entities were controlled by affiliates of AIG
SunAmerica.
Revenues. The Predecessors revenues consisted of the following:
|
|
|
lodging revenue, which consists of rooms, food and beverage and other department revenues
from its consolidated and combined hotels and resorts; |
39
|
|
|
management fee revenue from both resort activity and non-resort activity, which includes
fees received under its management agreements; and |
|
|
|
|
other revenue, which consists of accounting fees, development fees, central reservation
fees, construction management fees and other fees. |
The Predecessor employed the staff at its managed properties. Under its management agreements,
the hotel and resort owners reimbursed Predecessor for payroll, benefits and certain other costs
related to the operations of the managed properties. Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF, Issue No.
01-14, Income Statement Characteristics of Reimbursements for Out-of-pocket Expenses, (EITF
01-14) establishes standards for accounting for reimbursable expenses in Predecessors income
statement. Under this pronouncement, the reimbursement of payroll, benefits and costs is recorded
as revenue on Predecessors statements of operations, with a corresponding expense recorded as
other expenses from managed properties.
Operating Expenses. The Predecessors departmental operating expenses consisted of rooms,
food and beverage and other department expenses.
The Predecessors other operating expenses included the following items:
|
|
|
selling, general and administrative expenses, which were associated with the management
of hotels and resorts and which consist primarily of expenses such as corporate payroll and
related benefits, operations management, sales and marketing, finance, legal, information
technology support, human resources and other support services, as well as general corporate
expenses; |
|
|
|
|
property operation and maintenance expenses; |
|
|
|
|
depreciation and amortization; and |
|
|
|
|
other expenses from managed properties, which are recorded as an expense in accordance with EITF 01-14. |
Great Wolf Resorts Financial Information
Great Wolf Resorts financial information includes:
|
|
|
our corporate entity that provides resort development and management services; |
|
|
|
|
our Wisconsin Dells, Sandusky, Traverse City, Kansas City and Sheboygan operating resorts; and |
|
|
|
|
our Williamsburg and Pocono Mountains resorts that are under construction. |
Revenues. Our revenues consist of lodging revenue, which includes rooms, food and beverage,
and other department revenues from our resorts.
Operating Expenses. Our departmental operating expenses consist of rooms, food and beverage
and other department expenses.
Our other operating expenses include the following items:
|
|
|
selling, general and administrative expenses, which are associated with the management of
resorts and which consist primarily of expenses such as corporate payroll and related
benefits, operations management, sales and marketing, finance, legal, information technology
support, human resources and other support services, as well as general corporate expenses; |
|
|
|
|
property operation and maintenance expenses; and |
|
|
|
|
depreciation and amortization. |
40
Year Ended December 31, 2004 for the Company Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2003 for the
Predecessor
The Traverse City, Kansas City and Sheboygan resorts opened in March 2003, May 2003 and June
2004, respectively. We acquired the Wisconsin Dells and Sandusky resorts as part of the IPO in
December 2004. As a result, comparisons of changes in total revenue, rooms revenue and other
revenue between the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2004 (during which two resorts were
open for the entire period, one resort opened, and we purchased two resorts) and December 31, 2003
(during which two resorts opened) are not meaningful.
Revenues. Total revenues increased $23,634 to $69,887 for 2004 compared to $46,253 for 2003.
This increase was primarily due to:
|
|
|
The commencement of operations at the Great Wolf Lodge in Traverse City, Michigan, which
opened in March 2003. This resort had revenues of $22,885 for 2004 compared to $18,232 for
2003, an increase of $4,653; |
|
|
|
|
The commencement of operations at the Great Wolf Lodge in Kansas City, Kansas, which
opened in May 2003. This resort had revenues of $18,929 for 2004 compared to $9,971 for
2003, an increase of $8,958; and |
|
|
|
|
The commencement of operations at the Blue Harbor Resort in Sheboygan, Wisconsin, which
opened in June 2004. This resort had revenues of $8,350 for 2004. |
Operating expenses. Total departmental expenses increased $8,006 to $19,851 for 2004 compared
to $11,845 for 2003, primarily due to the opening of the Traverse City, Kansas City and Sheboygan
resorts in March 2003, May 2003 and June 2004, respectively.
Total other operating expenses increased $25,158 to $64,465 for 2004 compared to $39,307 for
2003. This increase was primarily due to:
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $14,609 to $25,985 for 2004
compared to $11,376 for 2003, primarily due to the effect of the Traverse City and Kansas
City resorts opening in 2003 and the Sheboygan resort opening in 2004, the effect of
additional labor costs at GLC due to increases in staffing, and $6,413 of IPO-related
expenses incurred in 2004. |
|
|
|
|
Property operating costs increased $3,822 to $9,105 for 2004 compared to $5,283 for 2003,
primarily due to the effect of the Traverse City and Kansas City resorts opening in 2003 and
the Sheboygan resort opening in 2004. |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $7,078 to $14,822 for 2004 compared to
$7,744 for 2003. This increase resulted from: |
|
|
|
|
the purchases or placement into service of property and equipment during 2003, primarily
at the Traverse City and Kansas City resorts that opened in 2003, and the related increase
in depreciation taken on those assets; and |
|
|
|
|
the purchases or placement into service of property and equipment in 2004, primarily at
the Sheboygan resort that opened in 2004, and the related increase in depreciation taken on
those assets. |
Operating loss. Operating loss for 2004 increased $9,530 to $(14,429) from $(4,899) for 2003.
Net loss. Net loss increased $12,241 to $(16,784) for 2004 from ($4,543) for 2003. This
increase was due to the increase in operating loss, as explained above, as well as the effect of
the following:
|
|
|
Net interest expense increased $2,380 to $6,738 for 2004 from $4,358 for 2003. This
increase was due primarily to increased debt levels as a result of finishing construction of
the Traverse City and Kansas City resorts during 2003 and the Sheboygan resort in 2004. |
|
|
|
|
Interest on mandatorily redeemable ownership interests increased $4,897 to $1,761 for
2004 from $(3,136) for 2003. This increase was due to an increase in the redemption value of
certain mandatorily redeemable equity interests in 2004. The Predecessor treated the
following as mandatorily redeemable financial instruments: |
41
|
|
|
Class A and Class B shares of GLC that were obligated to be redeemed in cash if a
shareholder died or incurred certain triggering events. The redemption price was calculated
based on a formula with GLCs net operating income and a multiple based on the type of
triggering event. The shares contained restrictions on transfers and sales by the
shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
Class B Units of Great Wolf Lodge of Kansas City, LLC that were required to be redeemed
in cash no later than the fifth anniversary date of the operating commencement date of the
Kansas City resort. The redemption price was based on the greater of fair value or an
internal rate of return. |
|
|
|
|
A cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $460 related to the adoption of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150 Accounting for Certain Financial
Instruments with Characteristics of Both Debt and Equity (SFAS 150) was recorded in 2003.
This gain resulted from recording at fair market value the value of certain mandatorily
redeemable equity interests. |
This increase was partially offset by:
|
|
|
A net gain on sale of real estate of $1,653 in 2004 due to the sales of land owned in
Ontario, Canada and Beckley, West Virginia. |
|
|
|
|
An income tax benefit of $2,563 recorded in 2004 related to the net loss incurred since
the IPO date. The Predecessor was not a taxable entity and therefore had no income tax
provision recorded prior to the IPO. |
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations increased $810 to $1,928 in 2004 from $1,118 in 2003,
due to lower minority interest expense in 2004. |
Year Ended December 31, 2003 for the Predecessor Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2002 for
the Predecessor
Revenues. Total revenues increased $28,035 to $46,253 for 2003 compared to $18,218 for 2002.
This increase was primarily due to:
|
|
|
the commencement of operations at the Great Wolf Lodge in Traverse City, Michigan, which
opened in March 2003. This property produced revenues of $18,232 in 2003; and |
|
|
|
|
the commencement of operations at the Great Wolf Lodge in Kansas City, Kansas, which
opened in May 2003. This property produced revenues of $9,971 in 2003. |
Operating expenses. Total departmental expenses for 2003 were $11,845 as a result of the
commencement of operations of the Traverse City and Kansas City resorts during 2003. The Traverse
City resort had $7,167 of rooms, food and beverage and other expenses in 2003. The Kansas City
resort had $5,054 of similar departmental expenses in 2003. There were no comparative departmental
expenses in 2002.
Total other operating expenses increased $19,497 to $39,307 for 2003, compared to $19,810 for
2002. This increase was primarily due to:
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $7,217 to $11,376 for 2003 from
$4,159 for 2002, primarily due to the effect of the Traverse City and Kansas City resorts
commencing operations in 2003. |
|
|
|
|
Property operating costs increased $4,652 to $5,283 for 2003 from $631 in 2002, primarily
due to the effect of the Traverse City and Kansas City resorts commencing operations in
2003. |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $7,532 to $7,744 for 2003 from $212
for 2002. This increase resulted from the purchases or placement into service of property
and equipment during 2003, primarily at the Traverse City and Kansas City resorts that
commenced operations in 2003, and the related increase in depreciation taken on those
assets. |
|
|
|
|
Other expenses from managed properties increased $96 to $14,904 for 2003 from $14,808 for
2002 due to increased payroll costs at managed properties. |
42
Operating loss. Operating loss for 2003 increased $3,307 to $(4,899) from $(1,592) for 2002.
Net loss. Net loss decreased $2,212 to $(4,543) in 2003 from $(6,755) in 2002. This decrease
was primarily due to the following:
|
|
|
Interest on mandatorily redeemable ownership interests decreased by $7,615 to $(3,136) in
2003 and $4,479 in 2002, due to the adoption of SFAS No. 150 on July 1, 2003 and the marking
to fair value of the derivative instruments related to the mandatorily redeemable ownership
interests. |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations increased $1,660 to $1,118 for 2003 from
$(542) for 2002. SFAS No. 144 requires the net activity of assets held for sale or disposed
of during a fiscal period to be classified as discontinued operations. The income from
discontinued operations increased significantly in 2003 as a result of gains on the sales of
the Manassas Country Inn & Suites, the Manassas Fairfield Inn and the Hampton Inn & Suites
Warwick during 2003. |
|
|
|
|
A cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $460 related to the adoption of
SFAS No. 150 was recorded in 2003. This gain resulted from recording at fair market value
the value of certain mandatorily redeemable equity interests. |
This decrease was partially offset by the increase in operating loss, as well as:
|
|
|
Net interest expense increased $4,229 to $4,358 in 2003 from $129 in 2002. This increase
was due primarily to increased debt levels as a result of finishing construction of the
Traverse City and Kansas City resorts during 2003. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2004, we had total indebtedness of $142,665 summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Debt: |
|
|
|
|
Senior credit facility |
|
$ |
|
|
Traverse
City/Kansas City Mortgage Loan |
|
|
75,000 |
|
Sheboygan
Mortgage Loan |
|
|
29,475 |
|
Williamsburg Construction Loan |
|
|
19,011 |
|
Poconos Construction Loan |
|
|
5,598 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,523 |
|
Other Debt: |
|
|
|
|
City of Sheboygan bonds |
|
|
8,063 |
|
City of Sheboygan loan |
|
|
3,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
142,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Credit Facility Upon closing the IPO, we entered into a $75,000 senior secured
revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks. The loan is secured by our Wisconsin Dells and
Sandusky resorts and is not drawn as of December 31, 2004. Future borrowings under this facility
will bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 2.25% to 3.00% depending upon our leverage ratio from
time to time. The maximum amount of indebtedness we may incur under the facility is equal to 3.75
multiplied by the combined EBITDA (adjusted for non-recurring items, unusual items, infrequent
items and asset impairment charges) of the two resorts securing the facility plus up to $5,400
relating to enhancements to the waterpark facility for the Wisconsin Dells property. The facility
has customary bank covenants including limiting the maximum level of total debt, the minimum level
of interest coverage, and the minimum level of fixed charge coverage. As of March 1, 2005, based on
the financial and debt service ratios contained in the revolving credit facility, approximately
$50,000 of the facility is available for borrowing. The facility also includes an annual unused
commitment fee of 0.5%.
Traverse
City/Kansas City Mortgage Loan Upon closing the IPO, we entered into a $75,000, ten-year loan secured by our
Traverse City and Kansas City resorts. The loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 6.96% and is
subject to a 25-year principal amortization schedule, with a balloon
principal payment due after ten years. The loan has customary financial and
operating debt compliance covenants, including a minimum debt service coverage ratio, representing
the combined EBITDA (adjusted for non-recurring items, unusual items, infrequent items and asset
impairment charges) of the two resorts divided by their combined annual interest expense and
principal amortization. The loan also has customary prohibitions on our ability to prepay the loan
prior to maturity.
Sheboygan Mortgage Loan The Sheboygan mortgage loan is secured by our Sheboygan resort. The
loan matures in January 2008 and bears interest at a floating rate of prime plus 200 basis points
and is subject to a 20-year principal and amortization schedule.
43
The loan has customary covenants associated with a single asset mortgage. There are no
prohibitions or fees associated with the repayment of the loan principal.
Williamsburg Construction Loan The Williamsburg construction loan was incurred to construct
the Williamsburg resort property. In February 2005, after drawing an additional $10,242 on this
loan, we retired the loan in full using cash on hand.
Poconos Construction Loan The Poconos construction loan was incurred to construct the
Poconos resort property. In March 2005, after drawing an additional $13,550 on this loan, we
retired the loan in full using cash on hand and the proceeds of junior subordinated debentures we
issued in March 2005.
City of Sheboygan bonds The City of Sheboygan (the City) bonds amount represents the face
amount of bond anticipation notes (BANs) issued by the City in November 2003 in conjunction with
the Predecessors construction of the Blue Harbor Resort in Sheboygan, Wisconsin. In accordance
with the provisions of EITF Issue No. 91-10 Accounting for Special Assessments and Tax Increment
Financing, we have recognized as a liability the obligations for these BANs. The notes bear
interest at 3.95% and mature in 2008. The notes are not a general obligation of the City and are
payable from (a) the proceeds of bond anticipation notes or other funds appropriated by the City
for the payment of interest on the BANs and (b) the proceeds to be delivered from the issuance and
sale of securities by the City. We have an obligation to fund payment of these BANs. Our obligation
to fund repayment of the notes will be satisfied by certain minimum guaranteed amounts of room tax
payments to be made by the Blue Harbor Resort through 2028.
City of Sheboygan loan The City of Sheboygan loan amount represents a loan made by the City
in 2004 to the Predecessor in conjunction with the Predecessors construction of the Blue Harbor
Resort in Sheboygan, Wisconsin. The loan is noninterest-bearing and matures in 2018. Our obligation
to repay the loan will be satisfied by certain minimum guaranteed amounts of real and personal
property tax payments to be made by the Blue Harbor Resort through 2018.
Junior Subordinated Debentures Subsequent to year-end, we completed a private offering of
$50,000 of trust preferred securities by Great Wolf Capital Trust I (the Trust), a Delaware
statuatory trust which is our subsidiary. The securities pay holders cumulative cash distributions
at an annual rate which is fixed at 7.80% through March 2015 and then floats at LIBOR plus 310
basis points. The securities mature in March 2035. In addition, we invested $1,500 in the trusts
common securities, representing 3% of the total capitalization of the trust.
The Trust used the proceeds of the offering and our investment to purchase from us $51,500 of
our junior subordinated debentures with payment terms that mirror the distribution terms of the
trust securities. The cost of the trust preferred offering totaled $1,600, including $1,500 of
underwriting commissions and expenses and $100 of costs incurred directly by the Trust. The Trust
paid these costs utilizing an investment from us. The proceeds from our debenture sale, net of the
costs of the trust preferred offering and our investment in the Trust, were $48,400. We used the
net proceeds to retire the Poconos construction loan and for future
development.
Short-Term Liquidity Requirements
Our short-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds necessary to pay operating
expenses including:
|
|
|
recurring maintenance, repairs and other operating expenses necessary to properly maintain our resorts; |
|
|
|
|
property taxes and insurance expenses; |
|
|
|
|
interest expense and scheduled principal payments on outstanding indebtedness; and |
|
|
|
|
general and administrative expenses. |
Historically, we have satisfied our short-term liquidity requirements through operating cash
flows, proceeds from borrowings and equity contributions from investors. In the future, we believe
that cash provided by our operations, together with borrowing capacity under our line of credit,
will be sufficient to fund our requirements for working capital, capital expenditures and debt
service for the next twelve months.
44
Long-Term Liquidity Requirements
Our long-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds necessary to pay for scheduled
debt maturities, renovations, expansion and other non-recurring capital expenditures that need to
be made periodically to our resorts as well as the costs associated with the development of new
resorts. We expect to meet these needs through existing working capital, cash provided by
operations and a combination of mortgage financing on properties being developed, additional
borrowings under our revolving credit facility, and the issuance of equity instruments, including
common stock, or additional or replacement debt, if market conditions permit. We believe these
sources of capital will be sufficient to provide for our long-term capital needs.
Our revolving credit facility and secured mortgage financing are material sources to satisfy
our long-term liquidity requirements. As such, compliance with their financial and operating debt
compliance covenants is material to our liquidity. Non-compliance with the covenants would have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and liquidity.
As we develop future resorts, we expect to finance a portion of the total construction cost of
each resort through a stand-alone construction loan on the resort. We expect to fund the remainder
of the total construction cost through cash provided from a combination of sources, including our
revolving credit facility, cash on hand and cash provided by operating activities. We expect to
consider converting stand-alone construction loans to longer-term permanent financing after each
resort commences operations.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment Terms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
3-5 Years |
|
|
5 Years |
|
Long-Term Debt Obligations(1) |
|
$ |
142,665 |
|
|
$ |
27,794 |
|
|
$ |
4,069 |
|
|
$ |
30,290 |
|
|
$ |
80,512 |
|
Operating Lease Obligations |
|
|
1,944 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
|
|
Construction Contracts |
|
|
45,282 |
|
|
|
45,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
189,891 |
|
|
|
73,447 |
|
|
$ |
4,893 |
|
|
$ |
31,039 |
|
|
$ |
80,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $8,063 of fixed rate debt recognized as a liability related to certain bonds issued
by the City of Sheboygan and $3,995 of fixed rate debt recognized as a liability related to a
loan from the City of Sheboygan. These liabilities will be satisfied by certain future minimum
guaranteed amounts of real and personal property tax payments and room tax payments to be made
by our Sheboygan resort. |
Working Capital
We
had $79,409 of available cash and cash equivalent assets and $15,837 of working capital
(current assets less current liabilities) at December 31, 2004, compared to the Predecessors
$3,490 of cash and cash equivalents and its working capital deficit of $(15,231) at December 31,
2003. This increase to cash and working capital, as compared to Predecessor historical amounts, are
primarily due to net cash provided by the IPO.
Cash Flows
Comparison of Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2004 for the Company to Year Ended December 31,
2003 for the Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
4,399 |
|
|
$ |
8,126 |
|
|
$ |
(3,727 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(162,055 |
) |
|
|
(64,280 |
) |
|
|
(97,775 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
233,575 |
|
|
|
54,854 |
|
|
|
178,721 |
|
Operating Activities. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities for the year
ended December 31, 2004, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2003, resulted primarily from
an increase in net loss in 2004.
45
Investing Activities. The increase in net cash used in investing activities for the year
ended December 31, 2004, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2003, resulted primarily from
the purchase of the resorts as part of the IPO and increased capital expenditures in the 2004
period as compared to the 2003 period, offset by a decrease in equity escrow and an increase in
proceeds from sales of assets in the 2004 period.
Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities increased for the year ended
December 31, 2004, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2003 primarily due to the IPO and
additional borrowings incurred in 2004.
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2003 for the Predecessor to Year Ended December 31, 2002 for
the Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
8,126 |
|
|
$ |
376 |
|
|
$ |
7,750 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(64,280 |
) |
|
|
(46,276 |
) |
|
|
(18,004 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
54,854 |
|
|
|
49,797 |
|
|
|
5,057 |
|
Operating Activities. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities for the year
ended December 31, 2003, as compared the year ended December 31, 2002, resulted primarily from
higher levels of depreciation and amortization in 2003, and a smaller net loss in 2003.
Investing Activities. The increase in net cash used in investing activities for the year
ended December 31, 2003 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2002, resulted primarily from
higher levels of capital expenditures in 2003 compared to 2002.
Financing Activities. The increase in net cash provided by financing activities for the year
ended December 31, 2003, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2002, was primarily due to
increased amounts of proceeds from long-term debt in 2003 compared to 2002.
Inflation
Our resort properties are able to change room and amenity rates on a daily basis, so the
impact of higher inflation can often be passed along to customers. However, a weak economic
environment that decreased overall demand for our products and services could restrict our ability
to raise room and amenity rates to offset rising costs.
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent
upon prevailing market interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes
in market prices and interest rates. In the future, we intend to use derivative financial
instruments to manage or hedge interest rate risks related to our borrowings. We do not intend to
use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes and anticipate entering into derivative
contracts only with major financial institutions with investment grade credit ratings.
As of December 31, 2004, we had total indebtedness of approximately $142,665. This debt
consisted of:
|
|
|
$75,000 of fixed rate debt secured by two of our resorts. This debt bears interest at
6.96%. |
|
|
|
|
$29,475 of variable rate debt secured by one of our resorts. This debt bears interest at
a floating rate equal to prime plus 200 basis points. The total rate was 7.25% at December
31, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
$8,063 of fixed rate debt (effective interest rate of 10.67%) recognized as a liability
related to certain bonds issued by the City of Sheboygan and $3,995 of noninterest bearing
debt recognized as a liability related to a loan from the City of Sheboygan. These
liabilities will be satisfied by certain future minimum guaranteed amounts of real and
personal property tax payments and room tax payments to be made by the Sheboygan resort; |
|
|
|
|
$19,011 of variable rate debt secured by our Williamsburg resort that is under construction; |
|
|
|
|
$5,598 of variable rate debt secured by our Pocono Mountains resort that is under construction; and |
|
|
|
|
$1,523 of other fixed rate debt. |
46
As of December 31, 2004, the fair values of the mortgage loans and other secured loans
approximate the carrying values as the terms are similar to those currently available to us for
debt with similar risks and remaining maturities.
In February and March 2005, we retired the Williamsburg and Poconos construction loans,
respectively. In March 2005, we also issued $51,500 of junior subordinated debentures, bearing
interest at a fixed rate of 7.80% through 2015. Giving pro forma effect to the retirements of the
Williamsburg and Poconos construction loans and the issuance of the junior subordinated debentures,
we had $169,556 of total debt, of which 83% was subject to fixed interest rates and 17% was
variable rate debt.
If the prime rate were to increase by 100 basis points, the increase in interest expense on
our variable rate debt (giving effect to the repayment of the Williamsburg and Poconos construction
loans in 2005, as discussed above) would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately
$295 annually. If the prime rate were to decrease by 1% or 100 basis points, the decrease in
interest expense on our variable rate debt would be approximately $295 annually.
47
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following consolidated and combined financial statements are filed as part of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
No. |
|
Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. and Subsidiaries and
Great Lakes Predecessor: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
48
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Great Wolf Resorts, Inc.
Madison, Wisconsin
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. and
subsidiaries (Great Wolf Resorts) and the combined balance sheet of Great Lakes Predecessor, as
defined in Note 1 to the combined financial statements, as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders
equity of Great Wolf Resorts for the period from December 21, 2004 (commencement of operations)
through December 31, 2004, the related combined statements of operations, cash flows and equity of
Great Lakes Predecessor for the period from January 1, 2004 through December 20, 2004 and the years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. These consolidated and combined financial statements are the
responsibility of Great Wolf Resortss management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these consolidated and combined financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. Great Wolf Resorts is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit
of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal
control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in
the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Great
Wolf Resortss and Great Lakes Predecessors internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of Great Wolf Resorts and the combined financial position of Great
Lakes Predecessor as December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, the consolidated results of
operations and cash flows of Great Wolf Resorts for the period from December 21, 2004 (commencement
of operations) through December 31, 2004, the combined results of operations and cash flows of
Great Lakes Predecessor for the period from January 1, 2004 through December 20, 2004 and the years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 2 to the combined financial statements, effective July 1, 2003, Great
Lakes Predecessor adopted SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity.
As
discussed in Note 15 to the consolidated and combined financial
statements, the accompanying 2004 consolidated and combined financial
statements have been restated.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 22, 2005 (November 29, 2005 as to Note 15)
49
GREAT WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resorts, Inc. |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
(as restated, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
see Note 15) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, |
|
|
|
except per share amounts) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
79,409 |
|
|
$ |
3,490 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $183 and $655 |
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
1,877 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
1,848 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
Condominiums
under development |
|
|
2,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
5,929 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
Assets of spun-off entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,382 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
90,479 |
|
|
|
32,200 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
347,374 |
|
|
|
120,874 |
|
Equity escrow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,722 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
9,862 |
|
|
|
5,288 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
19,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
155,196 |
|
|
|
1,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
622,025 |
|
|
$ |
173,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES, MINORITY INTERESTS AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
27,794 |
|
|
$ |
9,632 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
31,506 |
|
|
|
4,550 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
10,075 |
|
|
|
5,057 |
|
Advance deposits |
|
|
3,129 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
Long-term debt secured by assets of spun-off entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,108 |
|
Long-term debt secured by assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
74,642 |
|
|
|
47,431 |
|
Mortgage debt |
|
|
102,813 |
|
|
|
82,637 |
|
Other long-term debt |
|
|
12,058 |
|
|
|
1,464 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
40,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation liability |
|
|
2,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mandatorily redeemable ownership interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
233,704 |
|
|
|
142,726 |
|
Minority interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,585 |
|
Commitments and contingencies Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A voting Shares, no par value; 450 shares authorized, 329 shares
issued and 300 shares outstanding at December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B non-voting Shares, no par value; 8,550 shares authorized, 6,251
shares issued and 5,700 shares outstanding at December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(824 |
) |
Members equity of combined entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,263 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,256 |
) |
Great Wolf Resorts, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 30,262,308
shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2004 |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
394,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no
shares issued or outstanding at December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(3,842 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Shares of common stock held in deferred compensation plan |
|
|
(2,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
388,321 |
|
|
|
29,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, minority interests and equity |
|
$ |
622,025 |
|
|
$ |
173,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
50
GREAT WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resorts, Inc. |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 21, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
through |
|
|
through |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 20, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooms |
|
$ |
3,261 |
|
|
$ |
31,438 |
|
|
$ |
18,801 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
8,255 |
|
|
|
4,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other hotel operations |
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
7,855 |
|
|
|
4,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
Management fees related parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
2,574 |
|
Development and other fees related parties |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,629 |
|
|
|
50,705 |
|
|
|
31,349 |
|
|
|
3,410 |
|
Other revenue from managed properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,553 |
|
|
|
14,904 |
|
|
|
14,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
4,629 |
|
|
|
65,258 |
|
|
|
46,253 |
|
|
|
18,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses by department: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooms |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
4,917 |
|
|
|
3,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
7,370 |
|
|
|
4,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
6,308 |
|
|
|
4,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
7,372 |
|
|
|
18,613 |
|
|
|
11,376 |
|
|
|
4,159 |
|
Property operating costs |
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
8,810 |
|
|
|
5,283 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,897 |
|
|
|
12,925 |
|
|
|
7,744 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,820 |
|
|
|
58,943 |
|
|
|
36,248 |
|
|
|
5,002 |
|
Other expenses from managed properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,553 |
|
|
|
14,904 |
|
|
|
14,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
10,820 |
|
|
|
73,496 |
|
|
|
51,152 |
|
|
|
19,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss |
|
|
(6,191 |
) |
|
|
(8,238 |
) |
|
|
(4,899 |
) |
|
|
(1,592 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(224 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
6,748 |
|
|
|
4,413 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
(Gain) loss on sale of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Interest on mandatorily redeemable shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
(3,136 |
) |
|
|
4,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(6,405 |
) |
|
|
(14,870 |
) |
|
|
(6,121 |
) |
|
|
(6,213 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(2,563 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(3,842 |
) |
|
|
(14,870 |
) |
|
|
(6,121 |
) |
|
|
(6,213 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,928 |
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
|
(542 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
(3,842 |
) |
|
|
(12,942 |
) |
|
|
(5,003 |
) |
|
|
(6,755 |
) |
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(3,842 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,942 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,543 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,755 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
30,132,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
30,132,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
51
GREAT WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Entities |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Predecessor: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2001 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,960 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
452 |
|
|
$ |
(354 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,860 |
) |
Contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,648 |
|
Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(710 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(710 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,755 |
) |
Accretion of mandatorily
redeemable equity
interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,496 |
) |
Treasury shares repurchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(470 |
) |
|
|
(470 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2002 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,183 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,362 |
|
|
|
(824 |
) |
|
|
11,357 |
|
Contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,318 |
|
Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,538 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,856 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,248 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,543 |
) |
Accretion of mandatorily
redeemable equity
interests |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(460 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,631 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,093 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,256 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,263 |
|
|
|
(824 |
) |
|
|
29,183 |
|
Contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,788 |
|
Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,170 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,704 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,524 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,942 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 20, 2004 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,201 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34,350 |
|
|
$ |
(824 |
) |
|
$ |
31,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Resorts, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification, net of
effect of spin-off, of
Predecessors equity,
mandatorily redeemable
ownership interests and
minority interests |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
45,727 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
45,777 |
|
Net proceeds from sale of
common stock |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
248,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,667 |
|
Issuance of common stock
acquisition of resorts |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
97,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,719 |
|
Issuance of common stock
deferred compensation plan |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,842 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,842 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
$ |
394,060 |
|
|
$ |
(3,842 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,200 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
388,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
52
GREAT WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resorts, Inc. |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Period |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
December 21, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
through |
|
|
through |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 20, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
(as restated, see Note
15) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(3,842 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,942 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,543 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,755 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,897 |
|
|
|
13,107 |
|
|
|
10,440 |
|
|
|
4,169 |
|
Non-cash employee compensation expenses |
|
|
2,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,327 |
) |
|
|
(10,967 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of investments and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Minority interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,729 |
|
|
|
10,247 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(460 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax benefit |
|
|
(2,563 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
1,564 |
|
|
|
(9,236 |
) |
|
|
(883 |
) |
|
|
(675 |
) |
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
16,959 |
|
|
|
4,292 |
|
|
|
3,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
3,637 |
|
|
|
8,126 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures for property and equipment |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
(108,804 |
) |
|
|
(77,060 |
) |
|
|
(46,224 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,174 |
|
|
|
26,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of owners interest, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(95,460 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
(2,008 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in escrow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,564) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in equity escrow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,722 |
|
|
|
(13,671 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(97,583 |
) |
|
|
(64,472 |
) |
|
|
(64,280 |
) |
|
|
(46,276 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from equity offering |
|
|
273,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of offering costs |
|
|
(21,979 |
) |
|
|
(726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(152,417 |
) |
|
|
(16,805 |
) |
|
|
(17,765 |
) |
|
|
(3,523 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
68,330 |
|
|
|
63,496 |
|
|
|
29,018 |
|
Payment of loan costs |
|
|
(2,153 |
) |
|
|
(2,569 |
) |
|
|
(2,351 |
) |
|
|
(1,897 |
) |
Member contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,788 |
|
|
|
29,318 |
|
|
|
24,648 |
|
Member distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,370 |
) |
|
|
(3,856 |
) |
|
|
(710 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(470 |
) |
Changes in mandatorily redeemable ownership interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
(3,136 |
) |
|
|
4,479 |
|
Net distributions to minority investors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,985 |
) |
|
|
(10,852 |
) |
|
|
(1,748 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
172,151 |
|
|
|
61,424 |
|
|
|
54,854 |
|
|
|
49,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
75,330 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
(1,300 |
) |
|
|
3,897 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
4,079 |
|
|
|
3,490 |
|
|
|
4,790 |
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
79,409 |
|
|
$ |
4,079 |
|
|
$ |
3,490 |
|
|
$ |
4,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest |
|
$ |
698 |
|
|
$ |
6,317 |
|
|
$ |
4,786 |
|
|
$ |
493 |
|
Land contributed for membership interest |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
53
GREAT WOLF RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GREAT LAKES PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
1. ORGANIZATION
The terms Great Wolf Resorts, us, we and our are used in this report to refer to Great
Wolf Resorts, Inc. Through our controlling interest in Great Wolf Resort Operating Partnership,
L.L.L.P., or the Operating Partnership, of which we are the sole general partner, and the
subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership, we develop, own and operate family entertainment
resorts.
We were formed to succeed to certain businesses of the Great Lakes Predecessor (the
Predecessor), which was not a legal entity but rather a combination of numerous entities. The
Predecessor consisted of the following, all of which were under common management:
|
|
|
The Great Lakes Companies, Inc. (GLC), and its consolidated subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of Traverse City, LLC; |
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of Kansas City, LLC; |
|
|
|
|
Blue Harbor Resort Sheboygan, LLC; |
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of Williamsburg, LLC; and |
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf Lodge of the Poconos, LLC |
The Predecessor financial statements do not include entities that owned Great Wolf Lodges in
Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin and Sandusky, Ohio. These entities, although they were managed by GLC,
were controlled by affiliates of AIG SunAmerica, Inc.
The Predecessor has developed and operated hotels and multifamily housing projects since 1995.
In 1999, the Predecessor began its resort operations by purchasing the Great Wolf Lodge in
Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin and developing the Great Wolf Lodge in Sandusky, Ohio, which opened in
2001. In 2003, the Predecessor opened two additional Great Wolf Lodge resorts, one in Traverse
City, Michigan and the other in Kansas City, Kansas. In June 2004, the Predecessor opened the Blue
Harbor Resort in Sheboygan, Wisconsin. Additionally in 2004, the Predecessor had two additional
Great Wolf Lodge resorts under construction, one in Williamsburg, Virginia and the other in the
Pocono Mountains region of Pennsylvania, and had licensed a resort owned by a third party that was
under construction in Niagara Falls, Ontario (Canada).
We were incorporated in May 2004 as a Delaware corporation in anticipation of the initial
public offering of our common stock (the IPO). The IPO closed on December 20, 2004, concurrently
with the completion of various formation transactions (the Formation Transactions).
Pursuant to the Formation Transactions:
|
|
|
The Predecessor contributed its hotel management and multifamily housing management and
development assets, which were unrelated to the resort business, to two subsidiaries of the
Predecessor and then distributed the interests in those subsidiaries to the former
shareholders of GLC. |
|
|
|
|
We effected, through our Operating Partnership, the acquisition of GLC and each
resort-owning entity. Pursuant to these acquisitions, investors of GLC and the resort-owning
entities received cash, unregistered shares of our common stock or a combination of cash and
unregistered shares of our common stock. We issued 13,901,947 shares of our common stock and
paid approximately $97,600 in cash in connection with these acquisitions. |
|
|
|
|
We issued an aggregate of 130,949 shares of unregistered common stock to holders of
tenant in common interests in two of our resorts. |
54
These transactions consolidated the ownership of our resort properties and property interests
into Great Wolf Resorts. During the period from our formation until we commenced operations upon
closing of the IPO on December 20, 2004, we did not have any material corporate activity.
The IPO consisted of the sale of 16,100,000 shares of common stock at a price per share of
$17.00, generating gross proceeds of $273,700. The net proceeds to us were approximately $248,700
after deducting an aggregate of $19,200 in underwriting discounts and commissions paid to the
underwriters and $5,800 in other expenses directly related to the issuance of common stock (such as
professional fees and printing fees) incurred in connection with the IPO.
As of December 31, 2004, we develop, own and operate four Great Wolf Lodge resorts, our
signature northwoods-themed resorts, and one Blue Harbor Resort, a nautical-themed property. In
addition, we own two Great Wolf Lodge resorts that we are developing and that are under
construction and scheduled to open for business during 2005. We are also the licensor and manager
of an additional Great Wolf Lodge resort in Niagara Falls, Ontario that is owned and under
development by an affiliate of Ripley Entertainment Inc., or Ripleys.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation and Combination For the period subsequent to the IPO, the
accompanying consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of Great Wolf Resorts,
Inc., the Operating Partnership and the subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership. Property
interests (other than property contributed by GLC) contributed to the Operating Partnership by the
Predecessor and other investors have been accounted for as purchases, and the excess of the
purchase price over the related historical cost bases has been allocated to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed. For the period prior to our IPO, the accompanying combined financial
statements include all of the accounts of the Predecessor. All significant intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated and combined financial statements.
Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments
with an original maturity of three months or less when acquired. Cash is invested with quality
federally insured institutions that are members of the FDIC. Cash balances with institutions may be
in excess of federally insured limits or may be invested in time deposits that are not insured by
the institution, the FDIC or any other government agency. We have not realized any losses in such
cash investments and we believe that these investments are not exposed to any significant credit
risk.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts An allowance for doubtful accounts is provided when it is
determined that it is more likely than not a specific account will not be collected. Bad debt
expense for the period January 1, 2004 through December 20, 2004 and the years ended December 31,
2003 and 2002 was $239, $524, and $110, respectively, and writeoffs of accounts receivable for the
period January 1, 2004 through December 20, 2004 and the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
were $116, $136, and $22, respectively. There was no bad debt expense or writeoffs during the
period December 21, 2004 through December 31, 2004.
Inventory Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost or market.
Property and Equipment Investments in property and equipment are recorded at cost, except in
the case of acquired property and equipment, which is recorded at its
estimated fair value at the acquisition date. These
assets are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
40 years |
Land improvements |
|
15 years |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment, including waterpark equipment |
|
3-10 years |
We periodically review the estimated useful lives we have assigned to our depreciable assets to
determine whether those useful lives are reasonable and appropriate.
Improvements and replacements are capitalized when they extend the useful life, increase
capacity or improve the efficiency of the asset. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
Construction in process includes costs such as site work, permitting and construction related to
resorts under development. Interest is capitalized on construction in process balances during the
construction period. Interest capitalized totaled $1,918, $1,381, and $574 for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
55
Loan Fees Loan fees are capitalized and amortized over the term of the loan using a method
that approximates the effective interest method. Loan fees, net of accumulated amortization, were
$5,174, $2,938 and $1,724 as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Amortization of
loan fees was $1,386, $1,698, $1,137, and $984 for the period December 21, 2004 through December
31, 2004, the period January 1, 2004 through December 20, 2004, and the years ended December 31,
2003 and 2002, respectively. Included in loan fee amortization for the period December 21, 2004
through December 31, 2004, were $1,283 of loan fees that were written off due to repayment of debt
in conjunction with the IPO.
Assets Held for Sale The Predecessor classified as held for sale those properties that were
actively marketed for sale. A property classified as held for sale was carried at the lower of its
book value or estimated fair value less costs to sell. Depreciation of the held for sale propertys
assets was ceased at the time the property is classified as held for sale. The Predecessor
segregated the property and equipment, and long-term debt relating to the held for sale properties
on its combined balance sheets. The Predecessor segregated the operating activity and any gains or
losses upon disposition relating to the held for sale properties in income (loss) from discontinued
operations in its combined statements of operations.
Equity Escrow For certain of the entities included in the accompanying combined financial
statement, the Predecessor raised equity from members through private placements. Equity amounts
raised through these private placements are held in escrow and used in construction of resorts. We
are only permitted to use these funds for the construction of the applicable resorts. The funds are
held in a bank account which exceeds the FDIC insurance limit.
Goodwill The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of tangible and
identifiable intangible assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. We recorded goodwill in connection
with the Formation Transactions. The Predecessors goodwill resulted from the acquisition of a
hotel in 2000. Effective January 1, 2002, the Predecessor adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 142, which states that goodwill should not be amortized but instead tested for
impairment and adjusted, if applicable. Accordingly, the Predecessor ceased amortization of
goodwill as of January 1, 2002.
In connection with SFAS 142, we are required to assess goodwill and intangible assets for
impairment annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. We
assess goodwill for such impairment by comparing the carrying value of our reporting units to their
fair values. The Predecessor performed its initial goodwill impairment assessment on January 1,
2002 in connection with the adoption of SFAS 142 and determined that the carrying amounts of its
reporting units did not exceed their respective fair values. Accordingly, the initial
implementation of this standard did not result in a charge and, as such, did not impact the
Predecessors results of operations during 2002. Subsequent to the initial assessment, an
assessment of goodwill has been performed annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicated
impairment may have occurred, and during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
determined that no such impairment had occurred.
Other Intangible Assets Our other intangible assets consist of the value of our Great Wolf
Lodge trade name. This intangible asset has an indefinite useful life. In accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142., we do not amortize this intangible, but
instead test it for possible impairment at least annually by comparing the fair value of the
intangible asset with its carrying amount.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets When circumstances, such as adverse market conditions,
indicate that the carrying value of a long lived asset may be impaired, we perform an analysis to
review the recoverability of the assets carrying value. We make estimates of the undiscounted cash
flows (excluding interest charges) from the expected future operations of the asset. These
estimates consider factors such as expected future operating income, operating trends and
prospects, as well as the effects of demand, competition and other factors. If the analysis
indicates that the carrying value is not recoverable from future cash flows, an impairment loss is
recognized to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value. Any impairment
losses are recorded as operating expenses, which reduce net income. There were no impairment losses
in any of the periods presented.
Minority Interests The Predecessor recorded the non-owned equity interests of its
consolidated subsidiaries as minority interests on the combined balance sheets. The Predecessor
recognized losses that exceed the minority interest partys capital in a consolidated entity.
Distributions that exceed the minority interest partners capital in a consolidated entity were
recorded as distributions in excess of minority interest capital expense.
Derivative Instruments SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, requires an entity to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the
balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value. SFAS 137 and SFAS 138 amended certain
provisions of SFAS 133. The Predecessor did not generally enter into derivative instruments;
certain of the
56
Predecessors contracts, however, contained derivative instruments as defined in SFAS 133. The
Predecessors implementation of SFAS 133 resulted in the classification of certain derivative
instruments as liabilities.
Revenue Recognition We earn revenue from our resort operations, and from development and
other related services. The Predecessor also earned revenue from its hotel operations and hotel and
multifamily management and development services. We also recognize revenue from rooms, food and
beverage, and other operating departments at the resorts as earned at the time of sale or rendering
of service. Cash received in advance of the sale or rendering of services is recorded as advance
deposits on the balance sheets. We recognize development fees as earned under the completed
contract method for projects with a short duration, and the percentage of completion method (based
on contract-to-date costs incurred compared to total expected costs) for longer-term projects.
Gains on Sales of Real Estate SFAS No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, requires
an entity to recognize gains on sales of real estate only when a sale is consummated, the buyers
initial and continuing investments are adequate to demonstrate a commitment to pay, and risks and
rewards of ownership are transferred to the buyer. The Predecessor accounted for gains on sales of
real estate in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 66. In the period from January 1, 2004
through December 20, 2004, the Predecessor recognized a gain on sale of real estate of $1,072 from
the sale of land owned in Ontario, Canada and $581 from the sale of land in Beckley, West Virginia.
No gains or losses on sales of real estate were recognized between December 21, 2004 and December
31, 2004.
Income Taxes The Predecessor was comprised of a Subchapter S Corporation and limited
liability companies. Under applicable federal and state income tax rules, the net income or loss of
each of these entities was reportable in the income tax returns of the stockholders, partners and
members of the entities. Accordingly, no income tax provision was included in the accompanying
combined financial statements.
Subsequent to the IPO, we and our subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return
and separate state income tax returns. Under the liability method prescribed by SFAS 109, income
taxes are deferred for all temporary differences between pretax financial and taxable income and
between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities using the tax rates scheduled by law to be
in effect when the temporary differences reverse. Future tax benefits are recognized to the extent
that realization of such benefits is more likely than not. A valuation allowance is recorded for
those benefits that do not meet this criterion.
Advertising Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense for the period
December 21, 2004 through December 31, 2004, the period January 1, 2004 through December 20, 2004
and the year ended December 31, 2003 was $135, $3,148, and $2,218, respectively; advertising
expense for 2002 was insignificant.
IPO Costs Underwriting commissions and other costs directly related to sale of our common
stock in the IPO are reflected as a reduction of additional paid-in-capital. Included in selling,
general and administrative expenses are $5,550 and $863 of other expenses incurred as a result of
the IPO transactions, for the period January 1, 2004 through December 20, 2004 and December 21,
2004 through December 31, 2004, respectively. These expenses include a debt prepayment penalty,
write-offs of loan fees related to debt repaid or refinanced in conjunction with the IPO and
bonuses due to certain executives, pursuant to their employment arrangements, as a result of the
IPO.
Segments We view our operations as principally one segment and the financial information
disclosed herein represents all of the financial information related to our principal segment.
Stock Based Compensation We have issued stock options under our 2004 Stock Incentive Plan.
As permitted under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based
Compensation, we have elected to account for such options in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25
(APB 25), Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Under APB 25, the total compensation expense
recognized is equal to the difference between the awards exercise price and the underlying stocks
market prices at the measurement date. Stock options were granted at their fair market value;
therefore no compensation expense was recorded in the period December 21, 2004 through December 31,
2004. Had compensation costs been determined under the fair value method as set forth in SFAS 123,
the Companys pro forma net loss and net loss per share for the period December 21, 2004 through
December 31, 2004, would have been as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss, as reported |
|
$ |
(3,842 |
) |
Compensation expense, SFAS 123 fair value method |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss |
|
$ |
(3,890 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss per share Basic |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
Pro forma net loss per share Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
57
The weighted average fair value for the options granted in 2004 was $4.82. The SFAS 123 fair
value of options granted in 2004 was estimated using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the
following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average, risk free interest rate |
|
|
3.65 |
% |
Weighted-average, expected life of option |
|
5.0 years |
Expected stock price volatility |
|
|
23 |
% |
Use of Estimates To prepare financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, we must make estimates and assumptions. These
estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts in the financial statements, and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
New Accounting Pronouncements In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued SFAS No. 142. SFAS 142 eliminates the amortization of goodwill and replaces it with a
requirement to conduct an impairment analysis of the carrying value of the goodwill at least
annually, and more often as circumstances warrant. The provisions of SFAS 142 are required to be
applied starting with fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The Predecessor adopted SFAS
142 on January 1, 2002.
In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets. SFAS 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment and
disposal of long-lived assets. SFAS 144 requires the current and prior period operating results of
any asset that has been classified as held for sale or has been disposed of after January 1, 2002
and where the Predecessor had no continuing involvement to be recorded as discontinued operations.
Any gains or losses on final disposition are also included in discontinued operations. The
provisions of SFAS 144 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2001. The Predecessor adopted SFAS 144 on January 1, 2002. Certain of the
Predecessors hotel properties were classified as held for sale in the accompanying combined
balance sheets and, accordingly, the operating results of those properties were recorded in
discontinued operations in the combined statements of operations. A long-lived asset to be
distributed to owners in a spinoff is disposed of when it is distributed. In a period in which a
component of an entity has been disposed of, the results of operations of the entity for current
and prior periods are reported in discontinued operations. Certain assets of subsidiaries of the
Predecessor that have been spun off in connection with the Formation Transactions are classified as
assets of spun-off entities. The results of operations for these spun-off entities are recorded in
discontinued operations in the combined statements of operations.
Effective January 1, 2002, the Predecessor adopted the provisions of Emerging Issues Task
Force (EITF) Issue No. 01-14 Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for
Out-of-Pocket Expenses Incurred. EITF 01-14 establishes standards for accounting for
reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses incurred and the characterization as revenue and
expense in the statements of operations. In accordance with EITF 01-14, the Predecessor included in
operating revenues and expenses the reimbursement of costs it incurs on behalf of the third-party
owners of hotels managed by GLC. These costs relate primarily to payroll and benefit costs at
managed hotels where GLC is the employer. The Predecessor received reimbursements for these costs
based upon its costs with no added margin. Therefore, the adoption of EITF 01-14 did not impact its
operating results, cash flows or financial position. The Predecessor adopted EITF 01-14 by
retroactively applying it to all periods presented in the accompanying combined financial
statements. The effect of adopting EITF 01-14 was an increase in operating revenues and expenses of
$14,553, $14,904 and $14,808 for the period January 1, 2004 through December 20, 2004, and the
years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for
Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, an interpretation of FASB
Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 and rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34 (FIN 45), was issued in
November 2002. FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and
annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It
also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a
liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The initial
recognition and initial measurement provisions of FIN 45 are applicable on a prospective basis to
guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002, irrespective of the guarantors fiscal
year-end. The disclosure requirements in FIN 45 are effective for financial statements of interim
or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. There was no financial statement impact from the
adoption of FIN 45.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities, an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated
Financial Statements. FIN 46 prescribes how to identify variable interest entities and how an
enterprise assesses its interests in a variable interest entity to decide whether to consolidate
the entity. FIN 46
58
requires existing unconsolidated variable interest entities to be consolidated by their
primary beneficiaries if the entities do not effectively disperse risks among parties involved. The
original provisions of FIN 46 were effective February 1, 2003 for all arrangements entered into
after January 31, 2003. For arrangements entered into before February 1, 2003, the provisions of
FIN 46 applied in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003.
In December 2003, the FASB issued a revision of FIN 46 (FIN 46R) to clarify some of its
provisions. FIN 46R deferred the effective date for FIN 46 for arrangements entered into before
February 1, 2003 and results in multiple effective dates based on the nature as well as the
creation date of the variable interest entity. Variable interest entities created after January 31,
2003 but prior to December 24, 2003, may be accounted for either based on the original or the
revised interpretations. Variable interest entities created after December 24, 2003 must be
accounted for under the revised interpretations. FIN 46R is effective for periods ending after
March 15, 2004. The Predecessor applied FIN 46 to variable interest entities created after January
31, 2003 for the year ended December 31, 2003. The Predecessor applied FIN 46R to variable interest
entities effective January 1, 2004. Prior to the implementation of FIN 46 and FIN 46R, the
Predecessor consolidated entities for which it controlled major management and operating decisions.
There was no financial statement impact from the adoption of FIN 46 and FIN 46R.
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150 Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity. SFAS 150 requires the classification of certain
financial instruments that were previously classified as equity to be classified as liabilities.
The implementation of SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments issued or modified after May
31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after
June 15, 2003. The Predecessors implementation of SFAS 150 resulted in the classification of
certain mandatorily redeemable interests as liabilities, resulting in a cumulative effect of a
change in accounting principle of $460 for the year ended December 31, 2003.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123R), that requires companies to expense the value of employee stock options, discounts on
employee stock purchase plans and similar awards. Under SFAS 123R, share-based payment awards
result in compensation expense that will be measured at fair value on the awards grant date, based
on the estimated number of awards that are expected to vest. SFAS 123R is effective for periods
beginning after July 1, 2005, and applies to all outstanding and unvested share-based payment
awards at the adoption date. We have not completed our evaluation of the impact of adopting SFAS
123R.
3. PURCHASE ACCOUNTING IN CONNECTION WITH THE IPO
The IPO closed on December 20, 2004. In conjunction with the Formation Transactions completed
on that date, we issued a total of 14,032,896 shares of our common stock. We also paid cash of
approximately $97,600 to buy-out certain investors in the resort-owning entities and interests held
by AIG SunAmerica, Inc. in the Wisconsin Dells and Sandusky entities.
For the five resort-owning entities with operating resorts at the time of the Formation
Transactions, we recorded the Formation Transactions by applying the purchase method of accounting
in connection with GLCs acquisition of the five resort-owning entities. Through the exchanges of
shares of GLC for shares of our common stock, GLCs shareholders as a group had the largest
minority portion of any organized group of shareholder interest in our company, and GLCs former
senior management comprises our senior management. Accordingly, as prescribed by SFAS No. 141,
Business Combinations, GLC was identified as the accounting acquirer. We issued 4,755,318 shares
of our common stock with a value of $80,840 to the owners of the five resort-owning entities. The
value of our shares issued was determined based on the IPO price of $17.00 per share. Net of the
effects of the carryover in book value from the Predecessor to us of (1) the resorts equity
included in the Predecessors December 20, 2004 equity balance, (2) the resorts mandatorily
redeemable ownership interests and (3) the resorts minority interests, the total increase in our
equity from the issuance of these 4,755,318 shares was $69,057.
We also issued 4,909,077 shares of our common stock to the shareholders of GLC, the accounting
acquirer. As GLCs equity was carried forward to us at historical cost, the issuance of these
shares did not affect our total equity balance, but instead resulted in a reclassification of $50
from additional paid-in capital to common stock.
In conjunction with purchase accounting we:
|
|
|
Recorded property and equipment, other assets, debt and other liabilities at their
preliminarily estimated fair values; |
|
|
|
Recorded a deferred tax liability resulting from the difference between the preliminarily
estimated fair value and the tax basis of assets acquired from the
five resort-owning
entities. We recorded this liability at our anticipated effective tax rate of 40%; |
59
|
|
|
Eliminated mandatorily redeemable interests of the Predecessor due to the conversion of
those ownership interests to our common stock in conjunction with the Formation
Transactions; and |
|
|
|
Recorded as goodwill the excess of consideration in the purchase transaction over the
fair value of net tangible assets acquired from the five resort-owning entities. |
The following summarizes the purchase accounting piece of the Formation Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Great Wolf Resorts common stock issued |
|
$ |
80,840 |
|
Cash paid |
|
|
73,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of acquisition |
|
|
153,882 |
|
Fair value of debt assumed |
|
|
181,415 |
|
Fair value of property and equipment acquired |
|
|
(189,427 |
) |
Fair value
of intangible assets |
|
|
(10,296 |
) |
Deferred tax liability recorded |
|
|
11,297 |
|
Fair value of other assets and liabilities |
|
|
8,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
155,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
Some of the values and amounts used in the application of purchase accounting for our
consolidated balance sheet are based on preliminary estimates and assumptions. These estimates and
assumptions are subject to possible change as we finalize them in
2005, based on information we are waiting to obtain.
For the two resort-owning entities with resorts under construction at the time of the
Formation Transactions, we recorded the Formation Transactions as a purchase of assets of those two
entities. In conjunction with this accounting we:
|
|
|
Recorded all identifiable tangible and intangible assets at their estimated fair values
as of December 20, 2004; |
|
|
|
|
Allocated the excess consideration paid over the estimated fair value of the net assets
acquired to all identifiable tangible and intangible assets pro rata based on their
estimated fair values; |
|
|
|
|
Recorded a deferred tax liability resulting from the difference between the total
estimated fair values (including the excess amount described in the previous item) and the
tax bases of the assets acquired from the two resort-owning entities. We recorded this
liability at our anticipated effective tax rate of 40%. |
The following pro forma information is presented assuming the IPO and Formation Transactions
had been completed as of January 1, 2003. In managements opinion, all pro forma adjustments
necessary to reflect the material effects of these transactions have been made. The pro forma
information does not purport to present what the actual results of operations would have been if
the IPO and Formation Transactions had occurred on such date, nor to project the results of
operations for any future period.
Pro Forma Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
91,036 |
|
|
$ |
68,920 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(9,331 |
) |
|
|
(646 |
) |
Loss per basic and diluted share |
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
Land and improvements |
|
$ |
12,064 |
|
|
$ |
16,455 |
|
Building and improvements |
|
|
89,294 |
|
|
|
32,778 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
82,470 |
|
|
|
51,488 |
|
Construction in process |
|
|
164,160 |
|
|
|
25,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
347,988 |
|
|
|
126,654 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(614 |
) |
|
|
(5,780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
347,374 |
|
|
$ |
120,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in property and equipment at December 31, 2004, is $18,578 of construction in process that
is unpaid and is included in accounts payable.
60
5. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
Mortgage Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior credit facility |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Traverse City/Kansas City Mortgage Loan |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sheboygan
Mortgage Loan |
|
|
29,475 |
|
|
|
10,326 |
|
Williamsburg Construction Loan |
|
|
19,011 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
Poconos Construction Loan |
|
|
5,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-IPO Mortgage Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,470 |
|
Other mortgage debt |
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Sheboygan bonds |
|
|
8,063 |
|
|
|
1,468 |
|
City of Sheboygan loan |
|
|
3,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,682 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,665 |
|
|
|
93,733 |
|
Less current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
(27,794 |
) |
|
|
(9,632 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
114,871 |
|
|
$ |
84,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Credit Facility Upon closing the IPO, we entered into a $75,000 senior secured
revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks. The loan is secured by our Wisconsin Dells and
Sandusky resorts and is not drawn as of December 31, 2004. Future borrowings under this facility
will bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 2.25% to 3.00% depending upon our leverage ratio from
time to time. The maximum amount of indebtedness we may incur under the facility is equal to 3.75
multiplied by the combined EBITDA (adjusted for non-recurring items, unusual items, infrequent
items and asset impairment charges) of the two resorts securing the facility plus up to $5,400
relating to enhancements to the waterpark facility for the Wisconsin Dells property. The facility
has customary bank covenants including limiting the maximum level of total debt, the minimum level
of interest coverage, and the minimum level of fixed charge coverage. The facility also includes an
annual unused commitment fee of 0.5%.
Traverse City/Kansas City Mortgage Loan Upon closing the IPO, we entered into a $75,000,
ten-year loan secured by our Traverse City and Kansas City resorts. The loan bears interest at a
fixed rate of 6.96% and is subject to a 25-year principal
amortization schedule, with a balloon principal payment due after ten
years. The loan has
customary financial and operating debt compliance covenants, including a minimum debt service
coverage ratio, representing the combined EBITDA (adjusted for non-recurring items, unusual items,
infrequent items and asset impairment charges) of the two resorts divided by their combined annual
interest expense and principal amortization. The loan also has customary prohibitions on our
ability to prepay the loan prior to maturity. We were in compliance with all mortgage loan
covenants at December 31, 2004.
Sheboygan
Mortgage Loan The Sheboygan mortgage loan is secured by our Sheboygan resort.
The loan matures in January 2008 and bears interest at a floating rate of prime plus 200 basis
points and is subject to a 20-year principal amortization schedule. The loan has customary
covenants associated with a single asset mortgage. There are no prohibitions or fees associated
with the repayment of the loan principal. We were in compliance with the construction loan
covenants at December 31, 2004.
Williamsburg Construction Loan The Williamsburg construction loan was incurred to construct
the Williamsburg resort property. In February 2005, after drawing an additional $10,242 on this
loan, we retired the loan in full using cash on hand.
Poconos Construction Loan The Poconos construction loan was incurred to construct the
Poconos resort property. In March 2005, after drawing an additional $13,550 on this loan, we
retired the loan in full using cash on hand and the proceeds of junior subordinated debentures we
issued in March 2005.
Pre-IPO Mortgage Loans Prior to the IPO, the Predecessor maintained mortgage loans on each
of the Traverse City and Kansas City resorts. Those loans, totaling $72,298 at the IPO, were repaid
using a portion of the proceeds from the IPO.
Also, as part of the Formation Transactions, we assumed $75,648 of debt from the Wisconsin
Dells and Sandusky resorts. This debt was paid off using a portion of the proceeds from the IPO.
61
City of Sheboygan bonds The City of Sheboygan (the City) bonds amount represents the face
amount of bond anticipation notes (BANs) issued by the City in November 2003 in conjunction with
the Predecessors construction of the Blue Harbor Resort in Sheboygan, Wisconsin. In accordance
with the provisions of EITF Issue No. 91-10, we have recognized as a liability the obligations for
these BANs. The notes bear interest at 3.95% and mature in 2008. The notes are not a general
obligation of the City and are payable from (a) the proceeds of bond anticipation notes or other
funds appropriated by the City for the payment of interest on the BANs and (b) the proceeds to be
delivered from the issuance and sale of securities by the City. We have an obligation to fund
payment of these BANs. Our obligation to fund repayment of the notes will be satisfied by certain
minimum guaranteed amounts of room tax payments to be made by the Blue Harbor Resort through 2028.
City of Sheboygan loan The City of Sheboygan loan amount represents a loan made by the City
in 2004 to the Predecessor in conjunction with the Predecessors construction of the Blue Harbor
Resort in Sheboygan, Wisconsin. The loan is noninterest-bearing and matures in 2018. Our obligation
to repay the loan will be satisfied by certain minimum guaranteed amounts of real and personal
property tax payments to be made by the Blue Harbor Resort through 2018.
Lines of Credit The lines of credit were borrowings of GLC and were generally secured by
business security agreements, which pledged as collateral GLCs assets, assignments of stockholder
interests of GLCs principals and guarantees of GLCs stockholders. These borrowings were
terminated as of the IPO.
Junior Subordinated Debentures In March 2005, we completed a private offering of $50,000 of
trust preferred securities through Great Wolf Capital Trust I (the Trust), a Delaware statutory
trust which is our subsidiary. The securities pay holders cumulative cash distributions at an
annual rate which is fixed at 7.80% through March 2015 and then floats at LIBOR + 310 basis points.
The securities mature in March 2035. In addition, we invested $1,500 in the trusts common
securities, representing 3% of the total capitalization of the trust.
The Trust used the proceeds of the offering and our investment to purchase from us $51,500 of
our junior subordinated debentures with payment terms that mirror the distribution terms of the
trust securities. The cost of the trust preferred offering totaled $1,600, including $1,500 of
underwriting commissions and expenses and $100 of costs incurred directly by the Trust. The Trust
paid these costs utilizing an investment from us. The proceeds from our debenture sale, net of the
costs of the trust preferred offering and our investment in the Trust, were $48,400. We used the
net proceeds to retire the Poconos construction loan.
Future Maturities Future principal requirements on long-term debt are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
$ |
27,794 |
|
2006 |
|
|
1,925 |
|
2007 |
|
|
2,144 |
|
2008 |
|
|
28,721 |
|
2009 |
|
|
1,569 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
80,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
142,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
6. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the fair values of the mortgage loans and other secured
loans approximate the carrying values as the terms are similar to those currently available to us
for debt with similar risks and remaining maturities.
The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, other current assets, equity escrows and
accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of
these instruments.
7. INCOME TAXES
For the period December 21, 2004 through December 31, 2004, we incurred a pre-tax loss of
$(6,405) and recorded an income tax benefit of $(2,563) on that pre-tax loss. That income tax
benefit amount differs from the federal statutory income tax rate due to the effect of state and
local taxes. Our income tax benefit for that period consists of a deferred federal amount of $2,243
and a deferred state amount of $320. Our deferred tax asset of $2,563 results from the effect of
recording this benefit on our net operating loss carryforward of $(6,405) in the period and is
included in other current assets in the consolidated balance sheet. That carryforward
62
expires in 2019. We believe all of the net operating loss carryforwards will be realized;
therefore we have not established any valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset as of December
31, 2004.
Our
deferred tax liability of $40,909 as of December 31, 2004 was recorded in conjunction with
purchase accounting entries recorded for the five resort-owning entities with
operating resorts and the acquisition of the two resort-owning
entities with resorts under construction; all of these transactions
were associated with the IPO and the Formation Transactions.
We recorded this liability at our anticipated effective tax rate of 40%. The deferred liability
results substantially from the effects of accelerated depreciation and amortization of fixed
assets and the recording of assets acquired at fair value.
8. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Predecessor provided management, development, accounting, central reservations and other
services to the real estate entities invested in by the Predecessor and to affiliates of the owners
of the Predecessor. All management, development and other fees were earned from entities for which
GLC or its stockholders are the managing members or investees. Amounts due from related parties
were $1,521 at December 31, 2003.
We and the Predecessor have regularly used an aircraft owned by an entity owned by several of
our stockholders. Payments of $235, $149, and $122 were made in the period January 1, 2004 through
December 20, 2004, and the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, for the lease of
the aircraft for company business. There were no payments made in the period December 21, 2004
through December 31, 2004. The entity that owns the aircraft also had one employee for whom
Predecessor provided payroll and benefit services, the costs of which were reimbursed by the
entity.
A member of our senior management owns a 25% interest in the entity that leases space at the
Great Wolf Lodge in Wisconsin Dells and operates the spa located within that resort. That entity
made payments of $44, $35 for the period January 1, 2004 through December 20, 2004 and the year
ended December 31, 2003, respectively, to the resort and no payment in 2002 or the period December
21, 2004 through December 31, 2004.
The Predecessor received fees from an affiliate in connection with arranging the financing
transactions for certain of the Predecessors resorts. Total fees received by the Predecessor from
this entity were $604, $395 and $432 for the period January 1, 2004 through December 20, 2004, and
the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. There were no fees received for the
period December 21, 2004 through December 31, 2004.
We provide administrative services for a non-resort hotel entity and a multifamily housing
entity owned by certain current and former members of our senior management. Amounts due to us at
December 31, 2004 were insignificant. At December 31, 2004, we owed the multifamily housing entity
$472 for amounts they had provided to us. This amount was repaid in January 2005.
At December 31, 2004, we owed an affiliate $3,202 for amounts collected on behalf of the
affiliate. This amount was repaid in January 2005.
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Matters In the course of normal business activities, various lawsuits, claims and
proceedings have been or may be instituted or asserted against us. Based on currently available
facts, we believe that the disposition of matters pending or asserted will not have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Letter of Credit In connection with the construction of the Blue Harbor Resort, we have
supplied a $2,000 letter of credit in favor of the City of Sheboygan. The letter of credit expires
on December 31, 2005. There have been no draws on this letter of credit. We have made a $2,000
deposit with a bank as collateral for this letter of credit. The deposit is considered restricted
cash and is included in other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31,
2004.
Guarantees Based on certain criteria, FIN 45 requires a guarantor to recognize, at the
inception of a guarantee, a liability for that guarantee. The objective of the initial measurement
of the liability is the fair value of the guarantee at its inception. In connection with the
construction of the Blue Harbor Resort in Sheboygan, Wisconsin, Blue Harbor Resort Sheboygan, LLC
(BH Resort LLC) entered into agreements with the City of Sheboygan and The Redevelopment Authority
of the City of Sheboygan, Wisconsin (collectively, the City) whereby the City funded certain costs
of construction. The City funded $4,000 toward the construction of the Blue Harbor Resort and
related public improvements and $8,200 toward construction of a convention center connected to the
resort.
63
In exchange for the $4,000 funding, BH Resort LLC guaranteed real and personal property tax
payments over a fourteen-year period totaling $16,400. This obligation is also guaranteed jointly
by us and by three of our stockholders. The guarantee was entered into on July 30, 2003.
In exchange for the $8,200 funding, BH Resort LLC entered into a lease for the convention
center with the City. The initial term of the lease is 25 1/2 years with 15, 5-year renewal
options. Under the lease, BH Resort LLC will satisfy repayment of the $8,200 funding by making
guaranteed room tax payments totaling $25,944 over the initial term of the lease. This obligation
is also guaranteed jointly by us and by three of our stockholders. This guarantee was also entered
into on July 30, 2003.
As Blue Harbor Resort is a consolidated subsidiary, the debt related to the $4,000 and $8,200
fundings is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and we have not recorded any
liability related to the guarantees on those fundings.
Commitments We lease office space, storage space and office equipment under various
operating leases. Most of the leases include renewal options. Future minimum payments on these
operating leases are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2005. |
|
$ |
371 |
|
2006. |
|
|
424 |
|
2007. |
|
|
400 |
|
2008. |
|
|
406 |
|
2009. |
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was not significant.
We also have commitments on contracts to build the Predecessors resorts under construction.
Commitments on these contracts total $45,282 for periods subsequent to December 31, 2004.
Under a program available in the State of Kansas, the Predecessor entered into a transaction
with a local government for the sole purpose of enabling the Predecessor to save approximately $800
in sales and compensation use taxes that would have been otherwise payable on materials and
equipment incorporated into the Predecessors resort in Kansas City, Kansas. To effect the
transaction, the Predecessor transferred title to the site and the resort to the local government,
which leased the resort back to the Predecessor with an option (and ultimately the obligation) to
purchase for a nominal amount at the end of the lease term. The local government issued $42,260 of
industrial revenue bonds (IRBs), which were purchased by the Predecessor. The purchase of the
IRBs was funded by the deposit of proceeds of a third-party construction loan with the bond trustee
for application to payment of costs of the resort. In connection with the IPO, the Predecessor gave
notice of the exercise of its option to purchase the Kansas City, Kansas resort and tendered the
IRBs plus the nominal option price to effect the purchase. The local government authorized the
transfer of title back to Predecessor, and executed and delivered a deed and bill of sale.
10. RETIREMENT PLAN
We maintain a 401(k) profit sharing plan for our employees. Eligibility for participation in
the plan is based on an employee meeting certain minimum age and service requirements. Participants
may make voluntary, pre-tax contributions through salary deferrals to the plan. Employer matching
contributions are discretionary and are based on a percentage of employee contributions.
Contributions to the plan were $193, $166, and $131 for the period January 1, 2004 through December
20, 2004, and the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. There were no contributions
for the period December 21, 2004 through December 31, 2004.
11. EQUITY
General The Predecessor was comprised of a Subchapter S Corporation and limited liability
companies. As a result, equity for the Predecessor included par value and retained earnings (for
the Subchapter S Corporation) and members equity (for the limited liability companies). The
entities included in the Predecessors combined historical financial statements conducted business
under various operating agreements. These agreements governed the various classes of members,
distribution preferences, payment of dividends, liquidation preferences and voting rights.
64
Members Equity of Combined Entities The Predecessors combined financial statements
included certain entities that were under common management by GLC. Members equity of combined
entities on the combined balance sheets represents the portion of owners equity of those combined
entities not owned by GLC.
Treasury Stock The Predecessor accounted for repurchases of treasury shares under the cost
method. Treasury stock consisted of 29 Series A shares and 551 Series B shares at December 31,
2003.
Mandatorily Redeemable Ownership Interests In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 150,
the Predecessor identified the following items as meeting the criteria of a mandatorily redeemable
financial instrument:
|
|
|
Class A and Class B shares of GLC. GLC was obligated to redeem in cash the A Shares and
B Shares of a shareholder who died or incurred certain triggering events (as defined in the
Term Sheet of Buy and Sell Provisions for Shares in The Great Lakes Companies, Inc.). The
redemption price was calculated by a formula using GLCs net operating income and a multiple
based on the type of triggering event, as described in the Term Sheet. Both the A Shares and
the B shares contained restrictions on transfers and sales by the stockholders. |
|
|
|
|
Class B Units of Great Wolf Lodge of Kansas City, LLC. In accordance with provisions in
the Kansas City LLC Agreement, the LLC was required to redeem in cash the Class B Units no
later than the fifth anniversary date of the operating commencement date of the Kansas City
resort. The redemption price was based on the greater of fair value or an internal rate of
return. |
The rights of GLCs shareholders and Great Wolf Lodge of Kansas Citys Class B unitholders to
require the Predecessor to redeem these equity instruments represented embedded derivative
instruments. The Predecessor recorded these derivative instruments at their estimated fair values
at each of the reporting dates in the Predecessors accompanying combined balance sheets. The fair
values of the derivative instruments were included in mandatorily redeemable ownership interests.
For each period presented, the Predecessor marked the underlying derivative to its estimated fair
value. The change in the estimated fair value between periods was included in interest on
mandatorily redeemable ownership interests in the accompanying combined statements of operations.
The Predecessor adopted the provisions of SFAS 150 effective July 1, 2003. Prior to the
adoption of SFAS 150, the Predecessor accounted for the Kansas City Class B units under the
provisions of EITF Issue No. D-98. In accordance with that pronouncement, the Predecessor accounted
for the Kansas City Class B units as a mandatorily redeemable security and classified the
redemption amount outside of equity in the combined balance sheet. The security was initially
recorded at its fair value at date of issue, using accepted valuation techniques, and the security
was adjusted to its estimated redemption amount at each balance sheet date and recorded as
mandatorily redeemable ownership interests. On November 7, 2003, the FASB issued FASB Staff
Position No. 150-3, or FSP 150-3, indefinitely deferring the measurement provisions of SFAS 150
with respect to certain minority interests in consolidated ventures entered into prior to November
5, 2003. As a result, the Predecessor thereafter continued to account for the Kansas City security
under the provisions of EITF D-98.
As of December 31, 2003, the Predecessor has classified $11,194 related to these mandatorily
redeemable items as liabilities in the combined balance sheet.
Deferred Compensation Plan In 2004, we established a deferred compensation plan for certain
of our executives. The plan allows for contributions by both the participants and us. Pursuant to
their employment arrangements, certain executives received bonuses upon completion of the IPO.
Executives receiving bonus payments totaling $2,200 elected to defer those payments pursuant to our
deferred compensation plan. To satisfy this obligation, we contributed 129,412 shares of our common
stock to the trust that holds the assets to pay obligations under our deferred compensation plan.
The fair value of that stock at the date of contribution was $2,200. In accordance with the
provisions of EITF Issue No. 97-14, Accounting for Deferred Compensation Arrangements Where
Amounts earned Are Held in a Rabbi Trust and Invested, we have recorded the fair value of the
shares of common stock, at the date the shares were contributed to the trust, as a reduction of our
stockholders equity. Also, as prescribed by EITF 97-14, we account for the change in fair value of
the shares held in the trust as a charge to compensation cost. Accordingly, we recorded $691 of
non-cash employee compensation in the period December 21, 2004 through December 31, 2004.
Earnings per Share We calculate our basic earnings per common share by dividing net loss
available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding. Our diluted earnings per common share assumes the issuance of common stock for all
potentially dilutive stock equivalents outstanding. In periods in which there is a loss,
potentially dilutive stock equivalents are excluded from the computation of diluted weighted
average shares outstanding as the effect of those
65
potentially dilutive items is anti-dilutive. In accordance with the provisions of EITF 97-14,
the shares of common stock held in our deferred compensation plan are treated as treasury stock for
purposes of our earnings per share computations and therefore excluded from the basic and diluted
earnings per share calculations. Basic and diluted earnings per common share are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
December 21, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
through |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
Net loss attributable to common shares |
|
$ |
(3,842 |
) |
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic and diluted |
|
|
30,133 |
|
Net loss per share basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
12. STOCK OPTIONS
Under the Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. 2004 Incentive Stock Plan, we grant incentive stock options
and/or nonqualified stock options to employees and directors. The Plan authorizes us to grant up to
3,380,520 options, stock appreciation rights or shares of our common stock. Each option entitles
the holder to purchase one share of common stock at the specified option price. The options vest
over a three-year period and expire after ten years. For all options granted to date, the exercise
price was equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of grant.
As of December 31, 2004, we have granted 1,656,300 stock options, all at an exercise price of
$17.00. No options were exercisable during the period from December 21, 2004 through December 31,
2004.
13. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
As of December 31, 2001, an office building held by one of the Predecessors subsidiaries was
classified as held for sale. The building was sold in 2002. The gain realized upon sale was not
recognized because GLC had continuing involvement in the real estate after the sale. In May 2004,
GLC was released from the guarantee of the buyers mortgage and the sale was recognized, resulting
in a gain of $548. The operating activity of this office building and the related gain is included
in discontinued operations in the combined statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2002, the Predecessor had five hotels classified as held for sale. Three of
these hotels were sold in 2003, resulting in a gain of $10,967, and the remaining two hotels were
sold in 2004, resulting in a gain of $4,779. Operating results and the gain on disposition for the
hotels classified as held for sale are included in income (loss) from discontinued operations in
the combined statements of operations for the period January 1, 2004 through December 20, 2004 and
the years ended December 31, 2003, and 2002.
On December 20, 2004, in connection with the Formation Transactions, the Predecessor spun-off
its non-resort interests to the existing shareholders of GLC. As a result, we have included the
operations of the spun-off entities in discontinued operations for all periods.
Operating activity of the discontinued operations consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
through |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 20, |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
4,859 |
|
|
$ |
10,896 |
|
|
$ |
16,596 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
(5,529 |
) |
|
|
(10,498 |
) |
|
|
(17,164 |
) |
Gain on sale |
|
|
5,327 |
|
|
|
10,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests |
|
|
(2,729 |
) |
|
|
(10,247 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
1,928 |
|
|
$ |
1,118 |
|
|
$ |
(542 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on mortgage debt related to properties sold or spun off has been included in the
operating results above.
66
14. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
The following tables sets forth certain items included in our and the Predecessors
consolidated and combined financial statements for each quarter of the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
2003: |
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
Total Revenues |
|
$ |
5,082 |
|
|
$ |
13,030 |
|
|
$ |
15,659 |
|
|
$ |
12,482 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(2,092 |
) |
|
|
(298 |
) |
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
(3,658 |
) |
Net income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
(373 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
(5,699 |
) |
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(373 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
(5,699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great Wolf |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
Resorts, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
December 21, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
through |
|
|
through |
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
December 20, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
2004: |
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Total Revenues |
|
$ |
14,752 |
|
|
$ |
15,344 |
|
|
$ |
22,158 |
|
|
$ |
13,004 |
|
|
$ |
4,629 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(1,754 |
) |
|
|
(1,038 |
) |
|
|
(5,362 |
) |
|
|
(6,191 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(1,918 |
) |
|
|
(2,812 |
) |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(7,981 |
) |
|
|
(3,842 |
) |
Basic and diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
15. RESTATEMENT
Subsequent
to the issuance of our consolidated and combined financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2004, we determined that:
|
|
|
The acquisition of each of our Williamsburg and Pocono Mountains resorts in
conjunction with the Formation Transactions in December 2004 did not constitute an
acquisition of a business, as that term is defined in
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 98-3, Determining
Whether a Non-Monetary Transaction Involves Receipt of Productive
Assets of a Business, and that we
should have recorded each of those acquisitions as a purchase of assets, rather than a
purchase of a business. As a result, the amounts previously recorded as goodwill in
connection with the Williamsburg and Poconos resorts have now been recorded as increases
to identifiable intangible assets, and property and equipment. |
|
|
|
|
The provisions of EITF Issue No. 04-1, Accounting
for Preexisting Relationships between the Parties to a Business
Combination, were applicable to us as of the date of the
Formation Transactions in December 2004, and that some portion of the amounts previously
recorded as goodwill in connection with the five operating resorts purchased at that
time should have been recorded as increases to identifiable intangible assets. |
Additionally,
we determined that certain amounts and activity related to restricted
cash and condominium assets required reclassification in our
consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of cash flows. As a result of these items, we have restated our financial results for the year ended December 31,
2004 to properly reflect these items. We also recorded certain other
immaterial reclassifications. A summary of the significant effects of the restatement is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
Reported |
|
|
As Restated |
|
Cash and
cash equivalents |
|
$ |
81,417 |
|
|
$ |
79.409 |
|
Condominiums
under development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,412 |
|
Other
current assets |
|
|
3,921 |
|
|
|
5,929 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
275,758 |
|
|
|
347,374 |
|
Other Intangible Asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,114 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
218,727 |
|
|
|
155,196 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
11,298 |
|
|
|
40,909 |
|
Period
January 1, 2004 through December 20, 2004: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Cash Flows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(6,824 |
) |
|
|
(9,236 |
) |
Net cash
provided by operating activities |
|
|
6,049 |
|
|
|
3,637 |
|
Capital
expenditures for property and equipment |
|
|
(111,216 |
) |
|
|
(108,804 |
) |
Net cash
used in investing activities |
|
|
(66,884 |
) |
|
|
(64,472 |
) |
Period
December 21, 2004 through December 31, 2004: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Cash Flows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in
restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,008 |
) |
Net cash
used in investing activities |
|
|
(95,575 |
) |
|
|
(97,583 |
) |
67
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that
information in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified pursuant to
the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, include controls and procedures designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act
is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In
designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any
controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and
not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met.
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness
of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this report. In making this evaluation, we considered matters relating to the
restatement of our previously-issued consolidated financial statements, including the related
weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. After consideration of the matters
discussed above, we have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective
as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
On November 10, 2005, we announced that we were delaying the filing of our Form 10-Q for the
third quarter ended September 30, 2005 due to an evaluation of the application of purchase
accounting for certain transactions entered into in December 2004. We have subsequently filed our
third quarter Form 10-Q, which included the restatement of our condensed consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2004. We are now filing our Annual Report on Form
10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004, to reflect the restatement of our consolidated
financial statements, the notes thereto, and related disclosures for the year ended December 31,
2004. We also intend to file Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q/A for the quarters ended March 31,
2005 and June 30, 2005 to reflect the restatement of our unaudited consolidated financial
statements, the notes thereto and related disclosures for such quarters.
Our management believes that the errors giving rise to the restatement occurred because of a
variety of factors, including the complexity of the interpretation of accounting standards related
to the application of purchase accounting to our Formation Transactions. In this regard, we
concluded there was a material weakness in our internal control over
financial reporting related to the implementation of complex
accounting standards, including
the application of purchase accounting to our Formation Transactions. A material weakness is a
control deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood
that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or
detected.
In order to remediate this weakness in internal control, prior to the quarter ended September
30, 2005, we added staff to assist in addressing the implementation of complex accounting
standards, including the application of purchase accounting, and to provide for additional levels of
internal review over such complex transactions.
In connection with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are
in the process of reviewing, documenting and testing our systems of internal control over financial
reporting in order to provide the basis for our evaluation and report on these systems as of the
end of our fiscal year. We cannot be certain as to the timing of completion of our testing and our
ongoing remediation efforts. Accordingly, remediated controls may not be in place for a sufficient
time period over which to assess effectiveness, and our evaluation of internal control may not be
completed in time for our external auditors to complete their assessment on a timely basis. If we
are not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner, the reliability of
our internal control over financial reporting may be impacted.
68
Changes In Internal Control
During the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, there have not been any
changes to our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Remediation Measures for Identified Material Weakness
Our planned remediation measures in connection with the material weakness described above include
the following:
|
1. |
|
We will require continuing education over the next 12 months for our accounting and
finance staff who are responsible for financial reporting to ensure compliance with current
and emerging financial reporting and compliance practices. |
|
|
2. |
|
We will utilize outside consultants, other than our Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm, to assist us in our evaluation of complex accounting transactions and
related reporting, specifically in the area of purchase accounting,
in cases where we believe such additional expertise is appropriate. |
|
|
3. |
|
We will assess staff expertise in our accounting and finance areas and take any steps
necessary to staff our accounting and finance departments appropriately. |
|
|
4. |
|
We and our Audit Committee, as necessary, will consider additional items, or will alter
the planned steps above, in order to remediate further the material weakness described
above. |
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
This information is hereby incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement (under the
headings The Election of Directors and The Executive Officers).
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
This information is hereby incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement (under the
heading Executive Compensation).
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
This information is hereby incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement (under the
heading Ownership Of Our Common Stock).
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
This information is hereby incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement (under the
heading Certain Relationships And Related Transactions).
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
This information is hereby incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement (under the
heading Relationship With Independent Public Accountants).
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)(1) Financial Statements
The financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A are provided under Item
8.
69
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
All schedules are omitted since the required information is not present in amounts sufficient
to require submission to the schedule or because the information required is included in the
financial statements and notes thereto.
(a)(3) Exhibits
See Index to Exhibits.
70
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, the registrant has duly cause this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
Dated:
November 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
/s/ JOHN EMERY
John Emery
|
|
Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
November 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JAMES A. CALDER
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal |
|
|
James A. Calder
|
|
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
November 30, 2005 |
71
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The exhibits listed below are incorporated herein by reference to prior SEC filings by Registrant
or are included as exhibits in this Form 10-K/A.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
2.1
|
|
Form of Merger Agreement (Delaware) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed August 12, 2004) |
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Form of Merger Agreement (Wisconsin) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed August 12, 2004) |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation for Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. dated December 9,
2004 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1 filed August 12, 2004) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. effective December 20, 2004
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1
filed August 12, 2004) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Form of the Common Stock Certificate of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed October 21, 2004) |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated as of March 15, 2005, between Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. and JPMorgan
Chase Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 18, 2005) |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2005, by and among Chase Manhattan Bank USA,
National Association, as Delaware trustee; JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as property
trustee; Great Wolf Resorts, Inc., as depositor; and James A. Calder, Alex G. Lombardo and J. Michael
Schroeder, as administrative trustees (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 18, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
License Agreement, dated January 30, 2004, by and between The Great Lakes Companies, Inc. and Jim
Pattison Entertainment Ltd. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed September 23, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Development Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2003, among the City of Sheboygan, Wisconsin, the
Redevelopment Authority of the City of Sheboygan, Wisconsin, The Great Lakes Companies, Inc., Blue
Harbor Resort Sheboygan, LLC, and Blue Harbor Resort Condominium, LLC (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed August 12, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
First Amendment to the Development Agreement, dated June 25, 2004, by and among the City of Sheboygan,
Wisconsin, the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Sheboygan, Wisconsin, The Great Lakes Companies,
Inc., Blue Harbor Resort Sheboygan, LLC, and Blue Harbor Resort Condominium, LLC (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed August 12, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Tall Pines Exclusive License and Royalty Agreement, dated July 25, 2004, between Tall Pines Development
Corporation and The Great Lakes Companies, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed December 7, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.5+
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed January 21, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Form of Noncompete Agreement, Trade Secret and Confidentiality Agreement (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed January 21, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Form of Officers and Directors Indemnification Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.7 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed August 12, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Companys
Registration Statement |
72
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
on Form S-1 filed September 23, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.16+
|
|
Form of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed August 12, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.17+
|
|
Form of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. 2004 Incentive Stock Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.10 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed November 26, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.18+
|
|
Form of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.11 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed August 12, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Form of Transition Services Agreement between Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. and Great Lakes Hospitality
Partners, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Companys Registration Statement
on Form S-1 filed August 12, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Form of Transition Services Agreement, between Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. and Great Lakes Housing
Partners, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Companys Registration Statement
on Form S-1 filed August 12, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Form of Registration Rights Agreement, between Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. and the persons named therein
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1
filed August 12, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Revolving Credit Agreement, by and among Great Wolf Resorts, Inc., GWR Operating Partnership, L.L.L.P.,
the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, Citicorp North America, Inc., Societe Generale, Citigroup
Global Markets, Inc., SG Americas Securities LLC and Calyon New York Branch (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed January 21, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Loan Agreement by and among Great Wolf Resorts, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. and The
Travelers Insurance Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1 filed January 21, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2005, among Great Wolf Resorts, Inc., Great Wolf Capital Trust
I, Taberna Preferred Funding I, Ltd and Merrill Lynch International (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 1.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 18, 2005) |
|
|
|
21.1*
|
|
List of Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
23.1*
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a14(a) and Rule 15d14(a) |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a14(a) and Rule 15d14(a) |
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
32.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
+ |
|
Indicated management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an
exhibit pursuant to Item 15(c) of Form 10-K. |
73