Pinnacle Financial Partners
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OF 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-31225
, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
62-1812853 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification |
organization)
|
|
No.) |
|
|
|
211 Commerce Street, Suite 300, Nashville, Tennessee
|
|
37201 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(615) 744-3700
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changes since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and
large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer þ Non-accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of April 30, 2007 there were 15,534,975 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per
share, issued and outstanding.
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
Report on Form 10-Q
March 31, 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (Pinnacle Financial) may from time to time make written
or oral statements, including statements contained in this report which may constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the Exchange Act). The words expect, anticipate, intend, consider,
plan, believe, seek, should, estimate, and similar expressions are intended to
identify such forward-looking statements, but other statements may constitute
forward-looking statements. These statements should be considered subject to various risks
and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements are made based upon managements belief
as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management pursuant
to safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Pinnacle Financials actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in
forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors. Such factors are described below
and in Pinnacle Financials Form 10-K, as updated by Item 1A of part II of this Form 10-Q
and include, without limitation, (i) unanticipated deterioration in the financial condition
of borrowers resulting in significant increases in loan losses and provisions for those
losses, (ii) increased competition with other financial institutions, (iii) lack of
sustained growth in the economy in the Nashville, Tennessee or Knoxville, Tennessee areas,
(iv) rapid fluctuations or unanticipated changes in interest rates, (v) the inability of
our bank subsidiary, Pinnacle National Bank to satisfy regulatory requirements for its
expansion plans, (vi) the inability of Pinnacle Financial to achieve its targeted expansion
goals in the Knoxville, Tennessee market, (vii) the ability of Pinnacle Financial to grow
its loan portfolio at historic or planned rates and (viii) changes in the legislative and
regulatory environment, including compliance with the various provisions of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Many of such factors are beyond Pinnacle Financials ability
to control or predict, and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on such
forward-looking statements. Pinnacle Financial does not intend to update or reissue any
forward-looking statements contained in this report as a result of new information or other
circumstances that may become known to Pinnacle Financial.
Page 1
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and noninterest-bearing due from banks |
|
$ |
47,180,452 |
|
|
$ |
43,611,533 |
|
Interest-bearing due from banks |
|
|
4,847,745 |
|
|
|
1,041,174 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
35,633,489 |
|
|
|
47,866,143 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
87,661,686 |
|
|
|
92,518,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
313,169,577 |
|
|
|
319,237,428 |
|
Securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $26,482,598 and $26,594,235
at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively) |
|
|
27,085,811 |
|
|
|
27,256,876 |
|
Mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
|
11,668,414 |
|
|
|
5,654,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
1,553,980,356 |
|
|
|
1,497,734,824 |
|
Less allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(16,792,017 |
) |
|
|
(16,117,978 |
) |
|
|
|
Loans, net |
|
|
1,537,188,339 |
|
|
|
1,481,616,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
37,638,657 |
|
|
|
36,285,796 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and other entities |
|
|
16,879,642 |
|
|
|
16,200,684 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
10,785,658 |
|
|
|
11,019,173 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
114,287,640 |
|
|
|
114,287,640 |
|
Core deposit intangible, net |
|
|
10,869,252 |
|
|
|
11,385,006 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
25,897,746 |
|
|
|
26,724,183 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,193,132,422 |
|
|
$ |
2,142,186,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand |
|
$ |
306,885,434 |
|
|
$ |
300,977,814 |
|
Interest-bearing demand |
|
|
249,691,538 |
|
|
|
236,674,425 |
|
Savings and money market accounts |
|
|
499,476,036 |
|
|
|
485,935,897 |
|
Time |
|
|
644,079,127 |
|
|
|
598,823,167 |
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
1,700,132,135 |
|
|
|
1,622,411,303 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
116,951,631 |
|
|
|
141,015,761 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
26,712,224 |
|
|
|
53,725,833 |
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
19,907,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debt |
|
|
51,548,000 |
|
|
|
51,548,000 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
4,484,595 |
|
|
|
4,952,422 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
10,480,316 |
|
|
|
12,516,523 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,930,215,901 |
|
|
|
1,886,169,842 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no
shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $1.00; 90,000,000 shares authorized;
15,530,975 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2007 and
15,446,074 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
15,530,975 |
|
|
|
15,446,074 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
212,333,180 |
|
|
|
211,502,516 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
36,711,165 |
|
|
|
31,109,324 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net |
|
|
(1,658,799 |
) |
|
|
(2,040,893 |
) |
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
262,916,521 |
|
|
|
256,017,021 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,193,132,422 |
|
|
$ |
2,142,186,863 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 2
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
28,977,224 |
|
|
$ |
13,178,830 |
|
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
3,346,120 |
|
|
|
2,861,118 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
669,519 |
|
|
|
400,773 |
|
Federal funds sold and other |
|
|
746,379 |
|
|
|
369,675 |
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
33,739,242 |
|
|
|
16,810,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
13,537,263 |
|
|
|
5,850,307 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
1,712,091 |
|
|
|
508,788 |
|
Federal funds purchased and other borrowings |
|
|
1,407,460 |
|
|
|
944,498 |
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
16,656,814 |
|
|
|
7,303,593 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
17,082,428 |
|
|
|
9,506,803 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
787,966 |
|
|
|
387,184 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
16,294,462 |
|
|
|
9,119,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
1,797,149 |
|
|
|
438,269 |
|
Investment sales commissions |
|
|
734,560 |
|
|
|
513,597 |
|
Insurance sales commissions |
|
|
636,962 |
|
|
|
264,828 |
|
Gain on loans and loan participations sold, net |
|
|
363,306 |
|
|
|
324,546 |
|
Trust fees |
|
|
420,290 |
|
|
|
52,000 |
|
Other noninterest income |
|
|
1,073,316 |
|
|
|
455,011 |
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
5,025,583 |
|
|
|
2,048,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and employee benefits |
|
|
8,266,501 |
|
|
|
4,448,357 |
|
Equipment and occupancy |
|
|
2,164,702 |
|
|
|
1,173,353 |
|
Marketing and other business development |
|
|
251,735 |
|
|
|
190,471 |
|
Postage and supplies |
|
|
454,916 |
|
|
|
185,409 |
|
Amortization of core deposit intangible |
|
|
515,754 |
|
|
|
131,682 |
|
Other noninterest expense |
|
|
1,470,083 |
|
|
|
756,612 |
|
Merger related expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
443,330 |
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
13,123,691 |
|
|
|
7,329,214 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
8,196,354 |
|
|
|
3,838,656 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,594,513 |
|
|
|
1,226,760 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,601,841 |
|
|
$ |
2,611,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
15,433,442 |
|
|
|
9,578,813 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
16,617,484 |
|
|
|
10,745,626 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 3
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in |
|
Unearned |
|
Retained |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Stockholders |
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Compensation |
|
Earnings |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2005 |
|
|
8,426,551 |
|
|
$ |
8,426,551 |
|
|
$ |
44,890,912 |
|
|
$ |
(169,689 |
) |
|
$ |
13,182,291 |
|
|
$ |
(2,893,640 |
) |
|
$ |
63,436,425 |
|
Transfer of unearned compensation
to additional paid-in capital upon
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169,689 |
) |
|
|
169,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of employee common
stock options and related tax
benefits |
|
|
14,180 |
|
|
|
14,180 |
|
|
|
109,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,292 |
|
Issuance of restricted common
shares pursuant to 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan |
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
(3,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger with Cavalry Bancorp, Inc. |
|
|
6,856,298 |
|
|
|
6,856,298 |
|
|
|
164,231,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,087,572 |
|
Costs to register common stock
issued in connection with the
merger with Cavalry Bancorp,
Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177,202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177,202 |
) |
Compensation expense for
restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,085 |
|
Compensation expense for stock
options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,596 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,611,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,611,896 |
|
Net unrealized holding losses on
available-for-sale securities,
net of deferred tax benefit
of $487,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(789,307 |
) |
|
|
(789,307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,822,589 |
|
|
|
|
Balances, March 31, 2006 |
|
|
15,300,629 |
|
|
$ |
15,300,629 |
|
|
$ |
209,067,488 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,794,187 |
|
|
$ |
(3,682,947 |
) |
|
$ |
236,479,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2006 |
|
|
15,446,074 |
|
|
$ |
15,446,074 |
|
|
$ |
211,502,516 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
31,109,324 |
|
|
$ |
(2,040,893 |
) |
|
$ |
256,017,021 |
|
Exercise of employee common
stock options and related tax
benefits |
|
|
58,475 |
|
|
|
58,475 |
|
|
|
389,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
448,283 |
|
Issuance of restricted common
shares pursuant to 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan |
|
|
26,426 |
|
|
|
26,426 |
|
|
|
(26,426 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense for
restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,282 |
|
Compensation expense for stock
options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362,000 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,601,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,601,841 |
|
Net unrealized holding gains on
available-for-sale securities,
net of deferred tax expense
of $234,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
382,094 |
|
|
|
382,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,983,935 |
|
|
|
|
Balances, March 31, 2007 |
|
|
15,530,975 |
|
|
$ |
15,530,975 |
|
|
$ |
212,333,180 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36,711,165 |
|
|
$ |
(1,658,799 |
) |
|
$ |
262,916,521 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 4
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,601,841 |
|
|
$ |
2,611,896 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization of premium on securities |
|
|
132,221 |
|
|
|
244,351 |
|
Depreciation and net amortization |
|
|
1,823,194 |
|
|
|
725,676 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
787,966 |
|
|
|
387,184 |
|
Gains on loans and loan participations sold, net |
|
|
(363,306 |
) |
|
|
(324,546 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
467,282 |
|
|
|
186,681 |
|
Deferred tax benefit |
|
|
(1,310,271 |
) |
|
|
(357,492 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from stock compensation |
|
|
(20,742 |
) |
|
|
(41,991 |
) |
Mortgage loans held for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans originated |
|
|
(36,739,515 |
) |
|
|
(21,034,095 |
) |
Loans sold |
|
|
31,044,228 |
|
|
|
20,558,889 |
|
Increase in other assets |
|
|
2,035,596 |
|
|
|
(898,056 |
) |
Decrease in other liabilities |
|
|
(2,504,034 |
) |
|
|
(11,294,420 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
954,460 |
|
|
|
(9,235,923 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activities in securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
(3,355,360 |
) |
|
|
(5,916,658 |
) |
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities, prepayments and calls |
|
|
10,078,338 |
|
|
|
7,479,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,722,978 |
|
|
|
1,562,375 |
|
|
|
|
Increase in loans, net |
|
|
(56,801,579 |
) |
|
|
(36,688,382 |
) |
Purchases of premises and equipment and software |
|
|
(2,292,955 |
) |
|
|
(233,346 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents acquired in merger with Cavalry Bancorp, Inc.,
net of acquisition costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,420,210 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and other entities |
|
|
(718,846 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,975 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(53,090,402 |
) |
|
|
1,981,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits |
|
|
78,001,234 |
|
|
|
22,167,707 |
|
Net decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
(24,064,130 |
) |
|
|
(1,922,321 |
) |
Net increase in Federal funds purchased |
|
|
19,907,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,000,000 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(27,013,609 |
) |
|
|
(23,000,000 |
) |
Exercise of common stock options |
|
|
427,541 |
|
|
|
81,301 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock compensation |
|
|
20,742 |
|
|
|
41,991 |
|
Costs incurred in connection with registration of common stock issued in
merger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177,202 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
47,278,778 |
|
|
|
28,191,476 |
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(4,857,164 |
) |
|
|
20,937,435 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
92,518,850 |
|
|
|
58,654,270 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
87,661,686 |
|
|
$ |
79,591,705 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 5
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Business Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (Pinnacle Financial) is a bank holding
company whose primary business is conducted by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Pinnacle National Bank
(Pinnacle National). Pinnacle National is a commercial bank located in Nashville, Tennessee.
Pinnacle National provides a full range of banking services in its primary market areas of
Davidson, Rutherford, Williamson, Sumner and Bedford Counties.
Basis of Presentation These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Pinnacle Financial and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. PNFP Statutory Trust I, PNFP Statutory Trust
II, PNFP Statutory Trust III and Collateral Plus, LLC, are affiliates of Pinnacle Financial and are
included in these consolidated financial statements pursuant to the equity method of accounting.
Significant intercompany transactions and accounts are eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities
as of the balance sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly
susceptible to significant change in the near term include the determination of the allowance for
loan losses.
Impairment Long-lived assets, including purchased intangible assets subject to
amortization, such as Pinnacle Financials core deposit intangible asset, are reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a
comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected
to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future
cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized for the excess of the carrying amount over the fair
value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or
fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated.
Goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are tested annually for
impairment, and more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be
impaired. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the
assets fair value. Pinnacle Financials annual assessment date is as of September 30 such that
the assessment will be completed during the fourth quarter of each year. Should Pinnacle Financial
determine in a future period that the goodwill recorded in connection with the acquisition of
Cavalry Bancorp, Inc. (Cavalry) has been impaired, then a charge to earnings will be recorded in
the period such determination is made.
Cash and Cash Flows Cash on hand, cash items in process of collection, amounts due from
banks, Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell, with original
maturities within ninety days, are included in cash and cash equivalents. The following
supplemental cash flow information addresses certain cash payments and noncash transactions for
each of the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Cash Payments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
16,469,389 |
|
|
$ |
7,764,144 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
1,100,000 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
Noncash Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged-off to the allowance for loan losses |
|
|
187,818 |
|
|
|
43,976 |
|
Loans foreclosed upon with repossessions transferred to other assets |
|
|
110,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and options issued to acquire Cavalry Bancorp, Inc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,087,572 |
|
Page 6
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Income Per Common Share Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing net
income by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the
dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or
converted. The difference between basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding was
attributable to common stock options, warrants and restricted shares. The dilutive effect of
outstanding options, warrants and restricted shares is reflected in diluted earnings per share by
application of the treasury stock method.
As of March 31, 2007 and 2006, there were common stock options outstanding to purchase
1,846,000 and 1,602,000 common shares, respectively. Most of these options have exercise prices
and compensation costs attributable to future services, which when considered in relation to the
average market price of Pinnacle Financials common stock, are considered dilutive and are
considered in Pinnacle Financials diluted income per share calculation for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and 2006. There were common stock options of 618,000, and 388,000 outstanding as of
March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which were considered anti-dilutive and thus have not been
considered in the diluted earnings per share calculations below. Additionally, as of March 31,
2007 and 2006, Pinnacle Financial had outstanding warrants to purchase 395,000 and 406,000,
respectively, of common shares which have been considered in the calculation of Pinnacle
Financials diluted net income per share for three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.
The following is a summary of the basic and diluted earnings per share calculation for the
three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share calculation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator - Net income |
|
$ |
5,601,841 |
|
|
$ |
2,611,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator - Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
15,433,442 |
|
|
|
9,578,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share calculation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator - Net income |
|
$ |
5,601,841 |
|
|
$ |
2,611,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator - Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
15,433,442 |
|
|
|
9,578,813 |
|
Dilutive shares contingently issuable |
|
|
1,184,042 |
|
|
|
1,166,813 |
|
|
|
|
Average diluted common shares outstanding |
|
|
16,617,484 |
|
|
|
10,745,626 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
Comprehensive Income SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income describes comprehensive
income as the total of all components of comprehensive income including net income. Other
comprehensive income refers to revenues, expenses, gains and losses that under U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles are included in comprehensive income but excluded from net income.
Currently, Pinnacle Financials other comprehensive income consists of unrealized gains and losses,
net of deferred income taxes, on securities available-for-sale.
Note 2. Merger with Cavalry Bancorp, Inc.
On March 15, 2006, Pinnacle Financial consummated its merger with Cavalry Bancorp, Inc.
(Cavalry), a one-bank holding company located in Murfreesboro, Tennessee. Pursuant to the merger
agreement, Pinnacle acquired all of the outstanding shares of Cavalry common stock via a tax-free
exchange whereby Cavalry shareholders received a fixed exchange ratio of 0.95 shares of Pinnacle
Financial common stock for each share of Cavalry common stock, or approximately 6.9 million
Pinnacle Financial shares. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
activities of the former Cavalry since March 15, 2006.
Page 7
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
In accordance with SFAS No. 141, Accounting for Business Combinations (SFAS No.
141), SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142) and SFAS No. 147,
Acquisition of Certain Financial Institutions (SFAS No. 147), Pinnacle Financial recorded at
fair value the following assets and liabilities of Cavalry as of March 15, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
37,420,210 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
39,476,178 |
|
Loans, net of an allowance for loan losses of $5,102,296 |
|
|
545,598,367 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
114,287,640 |
|
Core deposit intangible |
|
|
13,168,236 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
42,936,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
792,887,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
583,992,422 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
17,766,661 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
18,851,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
620,610,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration paid for Cavalry |
|
$ |
172,277,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
As shown in the table above, total consideration for Cavalry approximates $172.3 million of
which $171.1 million was in the form of Pinnacle Financial common shares and options to acquire
Pinnacle Financial common shares and $1.2 million in investment banking fees, attorneys fees and
other costs related to the acquisition which have been accounted for as a component of the purchase
price. Pinnacle Financial issued 6,856,298 shares of Pinnacle Financial common stock to the former
Cavalry shareholders. In accordance with EITF No. 99-12, Determination of the Measurement Date for
the Market Price of Acquirer Securities Issued in a Purchase Business Combination, the
consideration shares were valued at $24.53 per common share which represents the average closing
price of Pinnacle Financial common stock from the two days prior to the merger announcement on
September 30, 2005 through the two days after the merger announcement. Aggregate consideration for
the common stock issued was approximately $168.2 million. Additionally, Pinnacle Financial also
has assumed the Cavalry Bancorp, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the Cavalry Plan) pursuant to
which Pinnacle is obligated to issue 195,551 shares of Pinnacle Financial common stock upon
exercise of stock options awarded to certain former Cavalry employees who held outstanding options
as of March 15, 2006. All of these options were fully vested prior to the merger announcement date
and expire at various dates between 2011 and 2012. The exercise prices for these stock options
range between $10.26 per share and $13.68 per share. In accordance with SFAS No. 141, Pinnacle
Financial has considered the fair value of these options in determining the acquisition cost of
Cavalry. The fair value of these vested options approximated $2.9 million which has been included
as a component of the aggregate purchase price.
In accordance with SFAS Nos. 141 and 142, Pinnacle Financial recognized $13.2 million as a
core deposit intangible in connection with its merger with Cavalry. This identified intangible is
being amortized over seven years using an accelerated method which anticipates the life of the
underlying deposits to which the intangible is attributable. For the three months ended March 31,
2007 and 2006, approximately $516,000 and $132,000 of amortization, respectively, was recognized in
the accompanying statement of income as other noninterest expense. Amortization expense associated
with this identified intangible will approximate $1.8 million to $2.1 million per year for the next
four years with lesser amounts for the remaining two years.
Pinnacle Financial also recorded other adjustments to the carrying value of Cavalrys assets
and liabilities in order to reflect the fair value of those net assets in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles, including a $4.8 million discount associated with the
loan portfolio, a $2.9 million premium for Cavalrys certificates of deposit and a $4.6 million
premium for Cavalrys land and buildings. Pinnacle Financial also recorded the corresponding
deferred tax assets or liabilities associated with these adjustments. The discounts and premiums
related to financial assets and liabilities are being amortized into the statements of income using
a method that approximates the level yield method over the anticipated lives of the underlying
financial assets or liabilities. For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the accretion
of the fair value discounts related to the acquired loans and certificates of deposit increased net
interest income by
approximately $833,000 and $431,000, respectively. Based on the estimated useful lives of the
acquired loans and deposits, Pinnacle Financial expects to recognize increases in net interest
income related to accretion of these purchase accounting adjustments of $3.2 million for the
remainder of 2007 and in subsequent years.
Statement of Position 03-03, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a
Transfer (SOP 03-03) addresses accounting for differences between contractual cash flows and cash
flows expected to be collected from an investors initial
Page 8
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
investment in loans or debt securities (loans) acquired in a transfer if those differences
are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. It includes loans acquired in purchase
business combinations and applies to all nongovernmental entities, including not-for-profit
organizations. The SOP does not apply to loans originated by the entity. At March 15, 2006,
Pinnacle Financial identified $3.9 million in loans to which the application of the provisions of
SOP 03-03 was required. The purchase accounting adjustments reflect a reduction in loans and the
allowance for loan losses of $1.0 million related to Cavalrys impaired loans, thus reducing the
carrying value of these loans to $2.9 million as of March 15, 2006. At March 31, 2007, the
carrying value of these loans had been reduced to $935,000 due to cash payments received from the
borrowers.
The following pro forma income statements assume the merger was consummated on January 1,
2006. The pro forma information does not reflect Pinnacle Financials results of operations that
would have actually occurred had the merger been consummated on such date (dollars in thousands,
except per share information).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006(1) |
|
|
|
Pro Forma Income Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
17,129 |
|
|
$ |
15,952 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
1,368 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
5,026 |
|
|
|
4,445 |
|
Noninterest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
8,267 |
|
|
|
7,089 |
|
Other noninterest expense |
|
|
4,857 |
|
|
|
5,138 |
|
|
|
|
Net income before taxes |
|
|
8,243 |
|
|
|
6,802 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,613 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,630 |
|
|
$ |
5,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Per Share Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
15,433,442 |
|
|
|
15,216,214 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
16,617,484 |
|
|
|
16,383,027 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In preparation and as a result of the merger during 2006, Cavalry and Pinnacle
Financial incurred significant merger related charges of approximately $10.5 million in
the aggregate, primarily for severance benefits, accelerated vesting of defined
compensation agreements, investment banker fees, etc. Including these charges would have
decreased pro forma net income for the three months ended March 31, 2006 by $7.84 million
resulting in a net loss of $2,742,000 and a basic and diluted pro forma net loss per share
of $0.18 and $0.17, respectively. |
During the three months ended March 31, 2006, Pinnacle Financial incurred merger integration
expense related to the merger with Cavalry of $443,000. These expenses were directly related to
the merger, recognized as incurred and reflected on the accompanying consolidated statement of
income as merger related expense.
Page 9
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 3. Securities
The amortized cost and fair value of securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at
March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
|
37,082,560 |
|
|
|
9,139 |
|
|
|
377,336 |
|
|
|
36,714,363 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
211,507,240 |
|
|
|
520,839 |
|
|
|
2,516,494 |
|
|
|
209,511,585 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
65,534,974 |
|
|
|
96,026 |
|
|
|
523,838 |
|
|
|
65,107,162 |
|
Corporate notes and other |
|
|
1,887,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,700 |
|
|
|
1,836,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
316,011,941 |
|
|
$ |
626,004 |
|
|
$ |
3,468,368 |
|
|
$ |
313,169,577 |
|
|
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
$ |
17,747,294 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
324,369 |
|
|
$ |
17,422,925 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
9,338,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278,844 |
|
|
|
9,059,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,085,811 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
603,213 |
|
|
$ |
26,482,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
Securities available-for-sale: |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. Government agency securities |
|
|
38,076,428 |
|
|
|
9,739 |
|
|
|
457,321 |
|
|
|
37,628,846 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
220,397,093 |
|
|
|
455,203 |
|
|
|
3,028,241 |
|
|
|
217,824,055 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
62,215,952 |
|
|
|
131,412 |
|
|
|
388,124 |
|
|
|
61,959,240 |
|
Corporate notes |
|
|
1,887,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,188 |
|
|
|
1,825,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
322,576,948 |
|
|
$ |
596,354 |
|
|
$ |
3,935,874 |
|
|
$ |
319,237,428 |
|
|
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
$ |
17,747,278 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
378,528 |
|
|
$ |
17,368,700 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
9,509,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284,113 |
|
|
|
9,225,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,256,876 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
662,641 |
|
|
$ |
26,594,235 |
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2007, approximately $295,092,000 of Pinnacle Financials investment portfolio was
pledged to secure public funds and other deposits and securities sold under agreements to
repurchase.
Page 10
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
At March 31, 2007 and 2006, included in securities were the following investments with
unrealized losses. The information below classifies these investments according to the term of the
unrealized loss of less than twelve months or twelve months or longer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments with an |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Loss of less than |
|
Investments with an Unrealized |
|
Total Investments with an |
|
|
12 months |
|
Loss of 12 months or longer |
|
Unrealized Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
At March 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
$ |
4,986,000 |
|
|
$ |
14,000 |
|
|
$ |
48,142,588 |
|
|
$ |
687,705 |
|
|
$ |
53,128,588 |
|
|
$ |
701,705 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
3,959,040 |
|
|
|
41,482 |
|
|
|
151,453,571 |
|
|
|
2,475,012 |
|
|
|
155,412,611 |
|
|
|
2,516,494 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
20,007,372 |
|
|
|
81,599 |
|
|
|
38,675,813 |
|
|
|
721,083 |
|
|
|
58,683,185 |
|
|
|
802,682 |
|
Corporate notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,836,467 |
|
|
|
50,700 |
|
|
|
1,836,467 |
|
|
|
50,700 |
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily-impaired securities |
|
$ |
28,952,412 |
|
|
$ |
137,081 |
|
|
$ |
240,108,439 |
|
|
$ |
3,934,500 |
|
|
$ |
269,060,851 |
|
|
$ |
4,071,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
47,988,246 |
|
|
$ |
835,849 |
|
|
$ |
47,988,246 |
|
|
$ |
835,849 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
13,959,080 |
|
|
|
68,965 |
|
|
|
149,496,521 |
|
|
|
2,959,276 |
|
|
|
163,455,601 |
|
|
|
3,028,241 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
13,975,595 |
|
|
|
47,071 |
|
|
|
35,660,379 |
|
|
|
625,166 |
|
|
|
49,635,974 |
|
|
|
672,237 |
|
Corporate notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,825,286 |
|
|
|
62,188 |
|
|
|
1,825,286 |
|
|
|
62,188 |
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily-impaired securities |
|
$ |
27,934,675 |
|
|
$ |
116,036 |
|
|
$ |
234,970,432 |
|
|
$ |
4,482,479 |
|
|
$ |
262,905,107 |
|
|
$ |
4,598,515 |
|
|
|
|
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on at least a
quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation.
Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been
less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the
intent and ability of Pinnacle Financial to retain its investment in the issue for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. Because the declines in fair value
noted above were attributable to increases in interest rates and not attributable to credit quality
and because Pinnacle Financial has the ability and intent to hold all of these investments until a
market price recovery or maturity, the impairment of these investments is not deemed to be
other-than-temporary.
Note 4. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
The composition of loans at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, |
|
At December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Commercial real estate Mortgage |
|
$ |
287,498,424 |
|
|
$ |
284,301,650 |
|
Commercial real estate Construction |
|
|
160,221,949 |
|
|
|
161,903,496 |
|
Commercial Other |
|
|
665,856,898 |
|
|
|
608,529,830 |
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial |
|
|
1,113,577,271 |
|
|
|
1,054,734,976 |
|
|
|
|
Consumer real estate Mortgage |
|
|
301,524,669 |
|
|
|
299,626,769 |
|
Consumer real estate Construction |
|
|
92,161,976 |
|
|
|
91,193,738 |
|
Consumer Other |
|
|
46,716,440 |
|
|
|
52,179,341 |
|
|
|
|
Total Consumer |
|
|
440,403,085 |
|
|
|
442,999,848 |
|
|
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
1,553,980,356 |
|
|
|
1,497,734,824 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(16,792,017 |
) |
|
|
(16,117,978 |
) |
|
|
|
Loans, net |
|
$ |
1,537,188,339 |
|
|
$ |
1,481,616,846 |
|
|
|
|
Page 11
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
for the year ended December 31, 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
16,117,978 |
|
|
$ |
7,857,774 |
|
Charged-off loans |
|
|
(187,818 |
) |
|
|
(818,467 |
) |
Recovery of previously charged-off loans |
|
|
73,891 |
|
|
|
244,343 |
|
Allowance acquired in acquisition of Cavalry (see note 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,102,296 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
787,966 |
|
|
|
3,732,032 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
16,792,017 |
|
|
$ |
16,117,978 |
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2007 and at December 31, 2006, Pinnacle Financial had certain impaired loans on
nonaccruing interest status. The principal balance of these nonaccrual loans amounted to
$4,774,000 and $7,070,000 at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. In each case, at
the date such loans were placed on nonaccrual, Pinnacle Financial reversed all previously accrued
interest income against current year earnings. Had nonaccruing loans been on accruing status,
interest income would have been higher by $102,000 and $18,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
At March 31, 2007, Pinnacle Financial had granted loans and other extensions of credit
amounting to approximately $23,035,000 to certain directors, executive officers, and their related
entities, of which $17,639,000 had been drawn upon. During the three months ended March 31, 2007,
$1,018,000 of new loans to certain directors, executive officers, and their related entities were
made and repayments totaled $237,000. At December 31, 2006, Pinnacle Financial had granted loans
and other extensions of credit amounting to approximately $23,392,000 to certain directors,
executive officers, and their related entities, of which approximately $16,858,000 had been drawn
upon. The terms on these loans and extensions are on substantially the same terms customary for
other persons for the type of loan involved. None of these loans to certain directors, executive
officers, and their related entities, were impaired at March 31, 2007.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, Pinnacle Financial sold participations
in certain loans to correspondent banks at an interest rate that was less than that of the
borrowers rate of interest. In accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles,
Pinnacle Financial recognized a net gain on the sale of these participated loans for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 of approximately $45,000 and $73,000, respectively, which is
attributable to the present value of the future net cash flows of the difference between the
interest payments the borrower is projected to pay Pinnacle Financial and the amount of interest
that will be owed the correspondent bank based on their participation in the loans. At March 31,
2007, Pinnacle Financial was servicing $120 million of loans for correspondent banks and other
entities, of which $114 million was commercial loans.
Note 5. Income Taxes
FASB Interpretation 48, Accounting for Income Tax Uncertainties (FIN 48) was issued in
June 2006 and defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax return positions in the
financial statements as more-likely-than-not to be sustained by the taxing authority. FIN 48
also provides guidance on the derecognition, measurement and classification of income tax
uncertainties, along with any related interest and penalties and includes guidance concerning
accounting for income tax uncertainties in interim periods. Pinnacle Financial adopted the
provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48), on
January 1, 2007, and determined there was no need to make an adjustment to retained earnings upon
adoption of this Interpretation. As of January 1, 2007, Pinnacle Financial has $700,000 of
unrecognized tax benefits related to Federal income tax matters. If ultimately recognized, this
amount will reduce goodwill associated with the acquisition of Cavalry and therefore would not
impact the Companys effective tax rate. The Company does not anticipate any material increase or
decrease in unrecognized tax benefits during 2007 relative to any tax positions taken prior to
January 1, 2007.
As of January 1, 2007, Pinnacle Financial has accrued no interest and no penalties related to
uncertain tax positions. It is Pinnacle Financials policy to recognize interest and/or penalties
related to income tax matters in income tax expense.
Pinnacle Financial and its subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. Federal income tax return.
The Company is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue
Service for the years ending December 31, 2003 through 2006.
Page 12
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Pinnacle Financial and its subsidiaries state income tax returns are open to audit under the
statute of limitations for the years ended December 31, 2002 through 2006.
Income tax expense attributable to income from continuing operations for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Current tax expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
3,598,664 |
|
|
$ |
1,474,215 |
|
State |
|
|
306,120 |
|
|
|
110,037 |
|
|
|
|
Total current tax expense |
|
|
3,904,784 |
|
|
|
1,584,252 |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax benefit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
(1,903,173 |
) |
|
|
(311,326 |
) |
State |
|
|
(217,098 |
) |
|
|
(46,166 |
) |
|
|
|
Total deferred tax benefit |
|
|
(1,310,271 |
) |
|
|
(357,492 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,594,513 |
|
|
$ |
1,226,760 |
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Financials income tax expense (benefit) differs from the amounts computed by
applying the Federal income tax statutory rates of 35% in 2007 and 34% in 2006 to income before
income taxes. A reconciliation of the differences for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Income taxes at statutory rate |
|
$ |
2,868,724 |
|
|
$ |
1,305,053 |
|
State tax expense, net of Federal tax effect |
|
|
57,864 |
|
|
|
39,998 |
|
Federal tax credits |
|
|
(90,000 |
) |
|
|
(75,000 |
) |
Tax-exempt securities |
|
|
(196,607 |
) |
|
|
(119,973 |
) |
Other items |
|
|
(45,468 |
) |
|
|
76,682 |
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
2,594,513 |
|
|
$ |
1,226,760 |
|
|
|
|
The effective tax rate for 2007 and 2006 is impacted by Federal tax credits related to the New
Markets Tax Credit program whereby a subsidiary of Pinnacle National has been awarded approximately
$2.3 million in future Federal tax credits which are available thru 2010. Tax benefits related to
these credits will be recognized for financial reporting purposes in the same periods that the
credits are recognized in the Companys income tax returns. The credit that is available for the
year ended December 31, 2007 is $360,000 and for the year ended December 31, 2006 is $300,000.
Pinnacle Financial believes that it will comply with the various regulatory provisions of the New
Markets Tax Credit program, and therefore has reflected the impact of the credits in its estimated
annual effective tax rate for 2007 and 2006.
The components of deferred income taxes included in other assets in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are as follows:
Page 13
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
6,918,726 |
|
|
$ |
6,654,334 |
|
Loans |
|
|
1,154,981 |
|
|
|
1,337,983 |
|
Securities |
|
|
1,017,449 |
|
|
|
1,251,636 |
|
Accrued liability for supplemental retirement agreements |
|
|
1,552,598 |
|
|
|
1,535,688 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
478,668 |
|
|
|
585,568 |
|
Other deferred tax assets |
|
|
271,361 |
|
|
|
340,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,394,168 |
|
|
|
11,705,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
349,788 |
|
|
|
1,563,078 |
|
Core deposit intangible asset |
|
|
4,270,772 |
|
|
|
4,473,076 |
|
FHLB dividends |
|
|
803,435 |
|
|
|
770,156 |
|
Other deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
435,536 |
|
|
|
440,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,859,531 |
|
|
|
7,246,952 |
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
5,534,637 |
|
|
$ |
4,458,553 |
|
|
|
|
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The
ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable
income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management
considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and
tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable
income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets
are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that Pinnacle Financial will realize
the benefit of these deductible differences. However, the amount of the deferred tax asset
considered realizable could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income
during the carryforward period are reduced.
Note 6. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
In the normal course of business, Pinnacle Financial has entered into off-balance sheet
financial instruments which include commitments to extend credit (i.e., including unfunded lines of
credit) and standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit are usually the result of lines
of credit granted to existing borrowers under agreements that the total outstanding indebtedness
will not exceed a specific amount during the term of the indebtedness. Typical borrowers are
commercial concerns that use lines of credit to supplement their treasury management functions,
thus their total outstanding indebtedness may fluctuate during any time period based on the
seasonality of their business and the resultant timing of their cash flows. Other typical lines of
credit are related to home equity loans granted to consumers. Commitments to extend credit
generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a
fee.
Standby letters of credit are generally issued on behalf of an applicant (our customer) to a
specifically named beneficiary and are the result of a particular business arrangement that exists
between the applicant and the beneficiary. Standby letters of credit have fixed expiration dates
and are usually for terms of two years or less unless terminated beforehand due to criteria
specified in the standby letter of credit. A typical arrangement involves the applicant routinely
being indebted to the beneficiary for such items as inventory purchases, insurance, utilities,
lease guarantees or other third party commercial transactions. The standby letter of credit would
permit the beneficiary to obtain payment from Pinnacle Financial under certain prescribed
circumstances. Subsequently, Pinnacle Financial would then seek reimbursement from the applicant
pursuant to the terms of the standby letter of credit.
Pinnacle Financial follows the same credit policies and underwriting practices when making
these commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Each customers creditworthiness is
evaluated on a case-by-case basis, and the amount of collateral obtained, if any, is based on
managements credit evaluation of
the customer. Collateral held varies but may include cash, real estate and improvements,
marketable securities, accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, and personal property.
The contractual amounts of these commitments are not reflected in the consolidated financial
statements and would only be reflected if drawn upon. Since many of the commitments are expected
to expire without being drawn upon, the contractual amounts
Page 14
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. However, should the commitments be
drawn upon and should our customers default on their resulting obligation to us, Pinnacle
Financials maximum exposure to credit loss, without consideration of collateral, is represented by
the contractual amount of those instruments.
A summary of Pinnacle Financials total contractual amount for all off-balance sheet
commitments at March 31, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$ |
510,561,720 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
54,772,369 |
|
At March 31, 2007, the fair value of Pinnacle Financials standby letters of credit was
$159,000. This amount represents the unamortized fee associated with these standby letters of
credit and is included in the consolidated balance sheet of Pinnacle Financial. This fair value
will decrease over time as the existing standby letters of credit approach their expiration dates.
Various legal claims also arise from time to time in the normal course of business. In the
opinion of management, the resolution of claims outstanding at March 31, 2007 will not have a
material effect on Pinnacle Financials consolidated financial statements.
Note 7. Stock Option Plan and Restricted Shares
Pinnacle Financial has two equity incentive plans under which it has granted stock options to
its employees to purchase common stock at or above the fair market value on the date of grant and
granted restricted share awards to employees and directors. During the first quarter of 2006 and
in connection with its merger with Cavalry, Pinnacle Financial assumed a third equity incentive
plan, the 1999 Cavalry Bancorp, Inc. Stock Option Plan (the Cavalry Plan). All options granted
under the Cavalry Plan were fully vested prior to Pinnacle Financials merger with Cavalry and
expire at various dates between January 2011 and June 2012.
As of March 31, 2007, of the 1,846,000 stock options outstanding, 1,238,000 of those options
were granted with the intention to be incentive stock options qualifying under Section 422 of the
Internal Revenue Code for favorable tax treatment to the option holder while 607,000 options would
be deemed non-qualified stock options and thus not subject to favorable tax treatment to the option
holder. All stock options under the plans vest in equal increments over five years from the date
of grant and are exercisable over a period of ten years from the date of grant.
A summary of the activity within the three equity incentive plans during the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and information regarding expected vesting, contractual terms remaining,
intrinsic values and other matters was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Contractual |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Term |
|
Value (1) |
|
|
Number |
|
Price |
|
(in years) |
|
(000s) |
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,658,459 |
|
|
$ |
12.93 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
$ |
31,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
252,443 |
|
|
|
31.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(58,475 |
) |
|
|
7.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(6,492 |
) |
|
|
29.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,845,935 |
|
|
$ |
16.56 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
26,277 |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding and expected to vest as of March 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,807,919 |
|
|
$ |
16.37 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
26,085 |
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,009,781 |
|
|
$ |
8.52 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
22,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of
the underlying awards and the quoted price of Pinnacle Financial common stock of $30.51 per
common share for the approximately 1.2 million options that were in-the-money at March 31, 2007. |
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, 142,000 option awards vested at an average
exercise price of $15.15 and an intrinsic value of approximately $3.9 million.
Page 15
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the aggregate intrinsic value of options
exercised under the equity incentive plans was $1.37 million determined as of the date of option
exercise. As of March 31, 2007, there was approximately $5.46 million of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to unvested stock options granted under the equity incentive plans. That
cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 4.1 years.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, Pinnacle Financial recorded stock-based
compensation expense using the
Black-Scholes valuation model for awards granted prior to, but not
yet vested, as of January 1, 2006 and for stock-based awards granted after January 1, 2006. For
these awards, Pinnacle Financial has recognized compensation expense using a straight-line
amortization method. Stock-based compensation expense has been reduced for estimated forfeitures.
The impact on the Companys results of operations (compensation and employee benefits expense) and
earnings per share of recording stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R)
(related to stock option awards) for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
Awards granted with |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the intention to be |
|
Non-qualified |
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
classified |
|
stock |
|
|
|
|
|
ended March 31, |
|
|
as incentive stock options |
|
option awards |
|
Total |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
116,000 |
|
|
$ |
246,000 |
|
|
$ |
362,000 |
|
|
$ |
152,000 |
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,000 |
|
|
|
97,000 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
Impact of stock-based compensation expense after
deferred income tax benefit |
|
$ |
116,000 |
|
|
$ |
149,000 |
|
|
$ |
265,000 |
|
|
$ |
144,000 |
|
|
|
|
Impact on earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
$ |
0.008 |
|
|
$ |
0.010 |
|
|
$ |
0.017 |
|
|
$ |
0.015 |
|
|
|
|
Fully diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
$ |
0.007 |
|
|
$ |
0.009 |
|
|
$ |
0.016 |
|
|
$ |
0.013 |
|
|
|
|
For purposes of these calculations, the fair value of options granted for each of the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and
the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
4.78 |
% |
|
|
4.40 |
% |
Expected life of options |
|
6.5 years |
|
|
|
6.5 years |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
20.94 |
% |
|
|
23.65 |
% |
Weighted average fair value |
|
$ |
10.79 |
|
|
$ |
9.31 |
|
Pinnacle Financials computation of expected volatility is based on weekly historical
volatility since September of 2002. Pinnacle Financial used the simplified method in determining
the estimated life of stock option issuances. The risk free interest rate of the award is based on
the closing market bid for U.S. Treasury securities corresponding to the expected life of the stock
option issuances in effect at the time of grant.
Additionally, Pinnacle Financials 2004 Equity Incentive Plan provides for the granting of
restricted share awards and other performance or market-based awards, such as stock appreciation
rights. There were no market-based awards or stock appreciation rights outstanding as of March 31,
2007. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, Pinnacle Financial awarded 23,196 shares,
respectively, of restricted common stock to certain executives of Pinnacle Financial. Of these
awards, 7,732 are considered granted for financial reporting purposes. The fair value of these
awards as of the date of grant was $31.70 per share. The forfeiture restrictions on the restricted
shares lapse in three separate traunches should Pinnacle Financial achieve certain earnings and
soundness targets over the subsequent three year period. 15,464 of the shares awarded on March 31,
2007 are not yet deemed to be granted for financial reporting purposes because the key terms
required to be achieved in order for the forfeiture restrictions to lapse the have not yet been defined.
Compensation expense associated with all restricted share awards is recognized over the time
period that the restrictions associated with the awards lapse based on a graded vesting schedule
such that each years traunche is amortized separately. For the three months ended March 31, 2007,
Pinnacle Financial recognized approximately $102,000 in compensation costs attributable to
Page 16
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
all awards issued prior to March 31, 2007. Accumulated compensation costs since the date
these shares were awarded have amounted to approximately $750,000 through March 31, 2007.
During 2006, the Board of Directors of Pinnacle Financial awarded 4,400 shares of restricted
common stock to the outside members of the board in accordance with their 2006 board compensation
package. On March 20, 2007, the Board of Directors of Pinnacle Financial awarded 3,230 shares of
restricted common stock to the outside members of the board in accordance with their 2007 board
compensation package. Each board member received an award of 323 shares. The restrictions on
these shares are expected to lapse on January 18, 2008 if each individual board member meets his or
her attendance goals for the various board and board committee meetings to which each member is
scheduled to attend during the year ended December 31, 2007. The weighted average fair value of
these restricted share awards granted to our directors in 2007 as of the date of grant was $32.30
per share. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, Pinnacle Financial recognized approximately
$3,000, in compensation costs attributable to these awards.
A summary of activity for restricted share awards for the three months ended March 31, 2007
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Management Awards |
|
Board of Director Awards |
(number of share awards) |
|
Vested |
|
Unvested |
|
Totals |
|
Vested |
|
Unvested |
|
Totals |
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
20,769 |
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
38,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,732 |
|
|
|
7,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,230 |
|
|
|
3,230 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
12,755 |
|
|
|
(12,755 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
33,524 |
|
|
|
12,477 |
|
|
|
46,001 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
3,230 |
|
|
|
7,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of compensation expense, net of the impact of income taxes, related to restricted
stock awards for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
105,000 |
|
|
$ |
34,000 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
41,000 |
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
|
Impact of stock-based compensation expense, net of income
tax benefit |
|
$ |
64,000 |
|
|
$ |
21,000 |
|
|
|
|
Impact on earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
$ |
0.004 |
|
|
$ |
0.002 |
|
|
|
|
Fully diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
$ |
0.004 |
|
|
$ |
0.002 |
|
|
|
|
Note 8. Regulatory Matters
Pinnacle National is subject to restrictions on the payment of dividends to Pinnacle Financial
under Federal banking laws and the regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Pinnacle Financial is also subject to limits on payment of dividends to its shareholders by the
rules, regulations and policies of Federal banking authorities. Pinnacle Financial has not paid
any cash dividends since inception, and it does not anticipate that it will consider paying
dividends until Pinnacle National generates sufficient capital from operations to support both
anticipated asset growth and dividend payments.
Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National are subject to various regulatory capital
requirements administered by Federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements
can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary actions, by regulators that,
if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements. Under capital
adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, Pinnacle Financial
and Pinnacle National must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of
the assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory
accounting practices. Pinnacle Financials and Pinnacle Nationals capital amounts and
classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk
weightings, and other factors.
Page 17
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require
Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier I
capital to risk-weighted assets and of Tier I capital to average assets. Management believes, as of
March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, that Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National met all capital
adequacy requirements to which they are subject. To be categorized as well-capitalized, Pinnacle
National must maintain minimum Total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as
set forth in the following table. Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle Nationals actual capital
amounts and ratios are presented in the following table (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Well-Capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
Under Prompt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
Corrective |
|
|
Actual |
|
Requirement |
|
Action Provisions |
|
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
At March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk weighted assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Financial |
|
$ |
210,559 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
$ |
142,162 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
not applicable |
Pinnacle National |
|
$ |
182,530 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
$ |
141,864 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
177,330 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Financial |
|
$ |
193,767 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
$ |
71,081 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
not applicable |
Pinnacle National |
|
$ |
165,738 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
$ |
70,932 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
106,398 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Tier I capital to average assets (*): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Financial |
|
$ |
193,767 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
$ |
81,161 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
not applicable |
Pinnacle National |
|
$ |
165,738 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
$ |
81,197 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
101,496 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk weighted assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Financial |
|
$ |
202,881 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
$ |
137,638 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
not applicable |
Pinnacle National |
|
$ |
175,159 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
$ |
137,340 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
171,676 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Financial |
|
$ |
186,763 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
$ |
68,819 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
not applicable |
Pinnacle National |
|
$ |
159,031 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
$ |
68,670 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
103,005 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Tier I capital to average assets (*): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Financial |
|
$ |
186,763 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
$ |
79,021 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
not applicable |
Pinnacle National |
|
$ |
159,031 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
$ |
79,056 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
98,820 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Average assets for the above calculations were based on the most recent quarter. |
Note 9. Business Segment Information
Pinnacle Financial has four reporting segments comprised of commercial banking, trust and
investment services, mortgage origination and insurance services. Pinnacle Financials primary
segment is commercial banking which consists of commercial loan and deposit services as well as the
activities of Pinnacle Nationals branch locations. Pinnacle Financials segments were changed in
2006 as a result of the acquisition of Cavalry to include Trust with Investment Services segment
and to add a new segment for Insurance Services. Trust and investment services include trust
services offered by Pinnacle National and all brokerage and investment activities associated with
Pinnacle Asset Management, an operating unit within Pinnacle National. Mortgage origination is
also a separate unit within Pinnacle National and focuses on the origination of residential
mortgage loans for sale to investors in the secondary residential mortgage market. Insurance
Services reflect the activities of Pinnacle Nationals wholly owned subsidiary, Miller and Loughry
Insurance Services, Inc. Miller and Loughry is a general insurance agency located in Murfreesboro,
Tennessee and is licensed to sell various commercial and consumer insurance products. The following
tables present financial information for each reportable segment as of March 31, 2007 and 2006 and
for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):
Page 18
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
Investment |
|
Mortgage |
|
Insurance |
|
Total |
|
|
Banking |
|
Services |
|
Origination |
|
Services |
|
Company |
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
17,047 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,082 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
788 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
2,648 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
5,026 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
11,397 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
13,124 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,338 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
2,594 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,207 |
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
5,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period assets |
|
$ |
2,188,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,382 |
|
|
$ |
2,193,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
9,504 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
9,507 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
2,048 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
6,716 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
7,329 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,384 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
2,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period assets |
|
$ |
1,823,662 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,550 |
|
|
$ |
1,828,212 |
|
|
|
|
Note 10. Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries and Other Entities
On December 29, 2003, the Company established PNFP Statutory Trust I; on September 15, 2005
the Company established PNFP Statutory Trust II; and on September 7, 2006 the Company established
PNFP Statutory Trust III (Trust I; Trust II; Trust III or collectively, the Trusts). All
are wholly-owned statutory business trusts. Pinnacle Financial is the sole sponsor of the Trusts
and acquired each Trusts common securities for $310,000; $619,000 and $619,000, respectively. The
Trusts were created for the exclusive purpose of issuing 30-year capital trust preferred securities
(Trust Preferred Securities) in the aggregate amount of $10,000,000 for Trust I; $20,000,000 for
Trust II and $20,000,000 for Trust III and using the proceeds to acquire junior subordinated
debentures (Subordinated Debentures) issued by Pinnacle Financial. The sole assets of the Trusts
are the Subordinated Debentures. Pinnacle Financials aggregate $1,548,000 investment in the
Trusts is included in investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and other entities in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2007 and the $51,548,000 obligation of
Pinnacle Financial is reflected as subordinated debt at March 31, 2007.
The Trust I Preferred Securities bear a floating interest rate based on a spread over 3-month
LIBOR (8.15% at March 31, 2007) which is set each quarter and mature on December 30, 2033. The
Trust II Preferred Securities bear a fixed interest rate of 5.848% per annum thru September 30,
2010 after which time the securities will bear a floating rate set each quarter based on a spread
over 3-month LIBOR. The Trust II securities mature on September 30, 2035. The Trust III Preferred
Securities bear a floating interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR (7.00% at March 31,
2007) which is set each quarter and mature on September 30, 2036.
Distributions are payable quarterly. The Trust Preferred Securities are subject to mandatory
redemption upon repayment of the Subordinated Debentures at their stated maturity date or their
earlier redemption in an amount equal to their liquidation amount plus accumulated and unpaid
distributions to the date of redemption. Pinnacle Financial guarantees the payment of
distributions and payments for redemption or liquidation of the Trust Preferred Securities to the
extent of funds held by the Trusts. Pinnacle Financials obligations under the Subordinated
Debentures together with the guarantee and other back-up obligations, in the aggregate, constitute
a full and unconditional guarantee by Pinnacle Financial of the obligations of the Trusts under the
Trust Preferred Securities.
The Subordinated Debentures are unsecured; bear interest at a rate equal to the rates paid by
the Trusts on the Trust Preferred Securities and mature on the same dates as those noted above for
the Trust Preferred Securities. Interest is payable quarterly. Pinnacle Financial may defer the
payment of interest at any time for a period not exceeding 20 consecutive quarters provided that
the deferral period does not extend past the stated maturity. During any such deferral period,
distributions on the Trust Preferred Securities will also be deferred and Pinnacle Financials
ability to pay dividends on our common shares will be restricted.
Page 19
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Subject to approval by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, the Trust Preferred
Securities may be redeemed prior to maturity at the Companys option on or after September 17, 2008
for Trust I; on or after September 30, 2010 for Trust II and September 30, 2011 for Trust III. The
Trust Preferred Securities may also be redeemed at any time in whole (but not in part) in the event
of unfavorable changes in laws or regulations that result in (1) the Trust becoming subject to
Federal income tax on income received on the Subordinated Debentures, (2) interest payable by the
parent company on the Subordinated Debentures becoming nondeductible for Federal tax purposes, (3)
the requirement for the Trust to register under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or
(4) loss of the ability to treat the Trust Preferred Securities as Tier I capital under the
Federal Reserve capital adequacy guidelines.
The Trust Preferred Securities for the Trusts qualify as Tier I capital under current
regulatory definitions subject to certain limitations. Debt issuance costs associated with Trust I
of $105,000 consisting primarily of underwriting discounts and professional fees are included in
other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. These debt issuance costs are being
amortized over ten years using the straight-line method. There were no debt issuance costs
associated with Trust II or Trust III.
Combined summary financial information for the Trusts follows (dollars in thousands) at March
31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006:
Combined Summary Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
Asset Investment in subordinated debentures issued by Pinnacle Financial |
|
$ |
51,548 |
|
|
$ |
51,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity Trust preferred securities |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
Common securities (100% owned by Pinnacle Financial) |
|
|
1,548 |
|
|
|
1,548 |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
51,548 |
|
|
|
51,548 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
51,548 |
|
|
$ |
51,548 |
|
|
|
|
Combined Summary Income Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Income Interest income from subordinated debentures issued by Pinnacle Financial |
|
$ |
876 |
|
|
$ |
485 |
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
876 |
|
|
$ |
485 |
|
|
|
|
Combined Summary Statement of Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
929 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
30,929 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
Dividends: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(470 |
) |
|
|
(470 |
) |
Common paid to Pinnacle Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
Balances, March 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
929 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
30,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,548 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
51,548 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
Issuance of trust preferred securities
Dividends: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(861 |
) |
|
|
(861 |
) |
Common paid to Pinnacle Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
Balances, March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,548 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
51,548 |
|
|
|
|
Page 20
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
In addition, the Company has investments in other entities which totaled approximately
$784,000 and $66,000 at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. These investments are
reported at fair value.
Page 21
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following is a discussion of our financial condition at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006
and our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. The purpose of
this discussion is to focus on information about our financial condition and results of operations
which is not otherwise apparent from the consolidated financial statements. The following
discussion and analysis should be read along with our consolidated financial statements and the
related notes included elsewhere herein.
Overview
General. Our rapid growth from inception through the first quarter of 2007 has had a material
impact on our financial condition and results of operations. This rapid growth resulted in net
income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 of $0.34 and $0.24, respectively. At
March 31, 2007, loans totaled $1.554 billion, as compared to $1.498 billion at December 31, 2006,
while total deposits increased to $1.700 billion at March 31, 2007 compared to $1.622 billion at
December 31, 2006.
Acquisition. On March 15, 2006, we consummated our merger with Cavalry. Pursuant to the merger
agreement, we acquired all Cavalry common stock via a tax-free exchange whereby Cavalry
shareholders received a fixed exchange ratio of 0.95 shares of our common stock for each share of
Cavalry common stock, or approximately 6.9 million Pinnacle Financial shares. The financial
information herein includes the activities of the former Cavalry (the Rutherford County market)
since March 15, 2006.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141, Accounting for
Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141), SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets (SFAS No.
142) and SFAS No. 147, Acquisition of Certain Financial Institutions (SFAS No. 147), we
recorded at fair value the following assets and liabilities of Cavalry as of March 15, 2006
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
37,420 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
39,476 |
|
Loans, net of an allowance for loan losses of $5,102 |
|
|
545,598 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
114,288 |
|
Core deposit intangible |
|
|
13,168 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
42,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
792,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
583,992 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
17,767 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
18,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
620,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration paid for Cavalry |
|
$ |
172,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
As noted above, total consideration for Cavalry approximates $172.3 million of which $171.1 million
was in the form of our common shares and options to acquire our common shares and $1.2 million in
investment banking fees, attorneys fees and other costs related to the purchase of Cavalry. We
issued 6,856,298 shares of our common stock to the former Cavalry shareholders. In accordance with
EITF 99-12, Determination of the Measurement Date for the Market Price of Acquirer Securities
Issued in a Purchase Business Combination, the shares were valued at $24.53 per common share which
represents the average closing price of our common stock from the two days prior to the merger
announcement on September 30, 2005 through the two days after the merger announcement. Aggregate
consideration for the common stock issued was approximately $168.2 million. Additionally, we also
have assumed the Cavalry Bancorp, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the Cavalry Plan) pursuant to
which we were obligated to issue 195,551 shares of our common stock upon exercise of stock options
awarded to certain former Cavalry employees who held outstanding options as of March 15, 2006. All
of these options were fully vested prior to the merger announcement date and expire at various
dates between 2011 and 2012. The exercise prices for these stock options range between $10.26 per
share and $13.68 per share. In accordance with SFAS No. 141, we considered the fair value of these
options in determining the acquisition cost of Cavalry. The fair value of these vested options
approximated $2.9 million which has been included as a component of the aggregate purchase price.
Page 22
In accordance with SFAS Nos. 141 and 142, we recognized $13.2 million as a core deposit intangible
in connection with our merger with Cavalry. This identified intangible is being amortized over
seven years using an accelerated method which anticipates the life of the underlying deposits to
which the intangible is attributable. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, approximately
$516,000 of amortization was recognized in the statement of income. Amortization expense
associated with the core deposit intangible will approximate $1.8 million to $2.1 million per year
for the next four years with lesser amounts for the remaining two years.
We also recorded other adjustments to the carrying value of Cavalrys assets and liabilities in
order to reflect the fair value of those net assets in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles, including a $4.8 million discount associated with the loan portfolio, a $2.9
million premium for Cavalrys certificates of deposit and a $4.6 million premium for Cavalrys land
and buildings. We have also recorded the corresponding deferred tax assets or liabilities
associated with these adjustments. The discounts and premiums related to financial assets and
liabilities will be amortized into our statements of income in future periods using a method that
approximates the level yield method over the anticipated lives of the underlying financial assets
or liabilities. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, the accretion of the fair value
discounts related to the acquired loans and certificates of deposit increased net interest income
by approximately $833,000 compared to $431,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Based on
the estimated useful lives of the acquired loans and deposits, we expect to recognize increases in
net interest income related to accretion of these purchase accounting adjustments of $3.2 million
in subsequent years.
We also incurred approximately $443,000 in merger related expenses during the three months ended
March 31, 2006 directly related to the Cavalry merger. These charges were for our integration of
Cavalry and accelerated depreciation and amortization related to software and other technology
assets whose useful lives were shortened as a result of the Cavalry acquisition. We do not
anticipate any merger related expenses associated with the Cavalry merger in 2007.
Knoxville, Tennessee Expansion. On April 9, 2007, we announced our plans to expand to the
Knoxville, Tennessee, market and the hiring of two prominent veteran bankers to lead our firm in
Knoxville. We have estimated that our expansion into Knoxville will result in a reduction in our
net income for 2007 as we hire new associates in that market and build out our initial branch
network. Our current estimates are that Knoxville will negatively impact our diluted earnings per
share by $0.08 in 2007.
Results of Operations. Our net interest income increased to $17.1 million for the first three
months of 2007 compared to $9.5 million for first three months of 2006. The net interest margin
(the ratio of net interest income to average earning assets) for the three months ended March 31,
2007 was 3.64% compared to 3.65% for the same period in 2006.
Our provision for loan losses was $788,000 for the first three months of 2007 compared to $387,000
for the same period in 2006. The provision for loan losses increased primarily due to increases in
loan volumes and charge-offs in 2007 compared to 2006.
Noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006
increased by $3.0 million, or 145%. This increase is largely attributable to the fee businesses
associated with the Cavalry acquisition, particularly with regard to service charges on deposit
accounts, insurance sales commissions and trust fees.
Our continued growth during the first three months of 2007 resulted in increased noninterest
expense compared to the first three months of 2006 due to the addition of the Rutherford County
market, increases in salaries and employee benefits, equipment and occupancy expenses and other
operating expenses. The number of full-time equivalent employees increased from 368.0 at March 31,
2006 to 419.5 at March 31, 2007. We expect to add additional employees throughout 2007 which will
cause our compensation and employee benefit expense to increase in 2007. Additionally, our branch
expansion efforts and our recently announced expansion into the Knoxville, Tennessee market will
result in increased operating expenses in the future.
Our efficiency ratio (the ratio of noninterest expense to the sum of net interest income and
noninterest income) was 59.4% for the first three months of 2007 compared to 63.4% for the same
period in 2006.
The effective income tax expense rate for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was approximately
31.6% compared to an effective income tax expense rate for the three months ended March 31, 2006 of
approximately
32.0%. The slight decrease in the effective tax rate between the two periods was due to increased
bank owned life insurance acquired with the Cavalry acquisition and other tax initiatives.
Page 23
Net income for the first three months of 2007 was $5.6 million compared to $2.6 million for the
same period in 2006, an increase of 114%.
Financial Condition. Loans increased $56.2 million during the first three months of 2007. As we
seek to increase our loan portfolio, we must also continue to monitor the risks inherent in our
lending operations. If our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover the estimated loan
losses in our loan portfolio, increases to the allowance for loan losses would be required which
would decrease our earnings.
We have successfully grown our total deposits to $1.700 billion at March 31, 2007 compared to
$1.622 billion at December 31, 2006, an increase of $77.7 million. This growth in deposits had a
higher funding cost due to rising rates and increased deposit pricing competition in 2007 compared
to 2006. We typically adjust our loan yields at a faster rate than we adjust our deposit rates.
As such, unless competitive pressures dictate, our deposit funding costs do not usually adjust as
quickly as do revenues from interest income on floating rate earning assets.
Capital and Liquidity. At March 31, 2007, our capital ratios, including our banks capital ratios,
met regulatory minimum capital requirements. Additionally, at March 31, 2007, our bank would be
considered to be well-capitalized pursuant to banking regulations. As our bank grows it will
require additional capital from us over that which can be earned through operations. We anticipate
that we will continue to use various capital raising techniques in order to support the growth of
our bank.
In the past, we have been successful in procuring additional capital from the capital markets (via
public and private offerings of trust preferred securities and common stock). This additional
capital was required to support our growth. As of March 31, 2007, we believe we have sufficient
capital to support our current growth plans, including our expansion into the Knoxville market.
However, expansion by acquisition of other banks or by branching into a new geographic market could
result in issuance of additional capital, including additional common shares.
We continue to believe there is broad acceptance of our business model and in our target markets of
small to mid-sized businesses and affluent clients, real estate professionals and consumers that
desire a deep relationship with their bank.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The accounting principles we follow and our methods of applying these principles conform with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles and with general practices within the banking industry.
In connection with the application of those principles, we have made judgments and estimates which,
in the case of the determination of our allowance for loan losses, the application of SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), Share Based Payments (SFAS No. 123(R)) and the assessment of impairment of the
intangibles resulting from the Cavalry merger have been critical to the determination of our
financial position and results of operations.
Allowance for Loan Losses (allowance). Our management assesses the adequacy of the allowance
prior to the end of each calendar quarter. This assessment includes procedures to estimate the
allowance and test the adequacy and appropriateness of the resulting balance. The level of the
allowance is based upon managements evaluation of the loan portfolios, past loan loss experience,
known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers
ability to repay (including the timing of future payment), the estimated value of any underlying
collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, economic conditions, industry and peer bank loan
quality indications and other pertinent factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it
requires material estimates including the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be
received on impaired loans that may be susceptible to significant change. Loan losses are charged
off when management believes that the full collectability of the loan is unlikely. A loan may be
partially charged-off after a confirming event has occurred which serves to validate that full
repayment pursuant to the terms of the loan is unlikely. Allocation of the allowance may be made
for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in managements
judgment, is deemed to be uncollectible.
Larger balance commercial and commercial real estate loans are impaired when, based on current
information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according
to the contractual terms of
the loan agreement. Collection of all amounts due according to the contractual terms means that
both the contractual interest payments and the contractual principal payments of a loan will be
collected as scheduled in the loan agreement.
Page 24
An impairment loss is recognized if the present value of expected future cash flows from the loan
is less than the recorded investment in the loan (recorded investment in the loan is the principal
balance plus any accrued interest, net deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premium or
discount, and does not reflect any direct write-down of the investment). The impairment loss is
recognized through the allowance. Loans that are impaired are recorded at the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, or if the loan is
collateral dependent, impairment measurement is based on the fair value of the collateral, less
estimated disposal costs. Income is recognized on impaired loans on a cash basis.
The level of allowance maintained is believed by management to be adequate to absorb losses
inherent in the portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is increased by provisions
charged to expense and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries of amounts previously
charged-off.
In assessing the adequacy of the consolidated allowance, we also consider the results of our
ongoing independent loan review process. We undertake this process both to ascertain whether there
are loans in the portfolio whose credit quality has weakened over time and to assist in our overall
evaluation of the risk characteristics of the entire loan portfolio. Our loan review process
includes the judgment of management, the input from our independent loan reviewer, and reviews that
may have been conducted by bank regulatory agencies as part of their usual examination process. We
incorporate loan review results in the determination of whether or not it is probable that we will
be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of a loan.
As part of managements quarterly assessment of the allowance, management divides the loan
portfolio into four segments: commercial, commercial real estate, consumer and consumer real
estate. Each segment is then analyzed such that an allocation of the allowance is estimated for
each loan segment.
The allowance allocation for commercial and commercial real estate loans begins with a process of
estimating the probable losses inherent for these types of loans. The estimates for these loans
are established by category and based on our internal system of credit risk ratings and historical
loss data for industry and various peer bank groups. The estimated loan loss allocation rate for
our internal system of credit risk grades for commercial and commercial real estate is based on
managements experience with similarly graded loans, discussions with banking regulators and our
internal loan review processes. We then weight the allocation methodologies for the commercial and
commercial real estate portfolios and determine a weighted average allocation for these portfolios.
The allowance allocation for consumer and consumer real estate loans which includes installment,
home equity, consumer mortgages, automobiles and others is established for each of the categories
by estimating losses inherent in that particular category of consumer and consumer real estate
loans. The estimated loan loss allocation rate for each category is based on managements
experience. Additionally, consumer and consumer real estate loans are analyzed based on our actual
loss rates, industry loss rates and loss rates of various peer bank groups. Consumer and consumer
real estate loans are evaluated as a group by category (i.e. retail real estate, installment, etc.)
rather than on an individual loan basis because these loans are smaller and homogeneous. We weight
the allocation methodologies for the consumer and consumer real estate portfolios and determine a
weighted average allocation for these portfolios.
The estimated loan loss allocation for all four loan portfolio segments is then adjusted for
managements estimate of probable losses for several environmental factors. The allocation for
environmental factors is particularly subjective and does not lend itself to exact mathematical
calculation. This amount represents estimated inherent credit losses which may exist, but have not
yet been identified, as of the balance sheet date based upon quarterly trend assessments in
delinquent and nonaccrual loans, unanticipated charge-offs, credit concentration changes,
prevailing economic conditions, changes in lending personnel experience, changes in lending
policies or procedures and other influencing factors. These environmental factors are considered
for each of the four loan segments and the allowance allocation as determined by the processes
noted above for each segment is increased or decreased based on the incremental assessment of these
various environmental factors.
We then test the resulting allowance balance by comparing the balance in the allowance to
historical trends and industry and peer information. Our management then evaluates the result of
the procedures performed, including the result of our testing, and concludes on the appropriateness
of the balance of the allowance in its entirety. The audit committee of our board of directors
reviews the assessment prior to the filing of quarterly and annual financial information.
For the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006, we assessed the allowance in two separate
processes using methodologies for both the Pinnacle portfolios as the portfolios existed prior to
the merger with Cavalry (the Nashville market)
Page 25
and the Rutherford County portfolio. Our methodology for the first two quarters of 2006 was
consistent with the past methodologies of Pinnacle Financial and Cavalry on a stand-alone basis.
In view of the acquisition, we evaluated the respective assessment methodologies and made certain
changes as noted above and implemented such changes during the third quarter of 2006. The revised
assessment methodology did not significantly impact our recorded allowance for loan losses.
Share Based Payments Our stock compensation is subject to financial accounting standards that
required us to assess numerous factors including the historical volatility of our stock price,
anticipated option forfeitures and estimates concerning the length of time that our options would
remain unexercised. Many of these assessments impact the fair value of the underlying stock option
more significantly than others and changes to these assessments in future periods could be
significant. We believe the assumptions we have incorporated into our stock option fair value
assessments are reasonable.
Impairment of Intangible Assets Long-lived assets, including purchased intangible assets subject
to amortization, such as our core deposit intangible asset, are reviewed for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the
carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by
the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an
impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the
fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the balance
sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no
longer depreciated.
Goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are tested annually for
impairment, and are tested for impairment more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that
the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying
amount exceeds the assets fair value. Our annual assessment date is September 30. Should we
determine in a future period that the goodwill recorded in connection with our acquisition of
Cavalry has been impaired, then a charge to our earnings will be recorded in the period such
determination is made.
Page 26
Results of Operations
Our results for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were highlighted by the continued
growth in loans and other earning assets and deposits, which resulted in increased revenues and
expenses. The following is a summary of our results of operations (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
2007-2006 |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Percent |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Increase |
Interest income |
|
$ |
33,739 |
|
|
$ |
16,811 |
|
|
|
100.7 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
16,657 |
|
|
|
7,304 |
|
|
|
128.1 |
% |
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
17,082 |
|
|
|
9,507 |
|
|
|
79.7 |
% |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
103.6 |
% |
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
16,294 |
|
|
|
9,120 |
|
|
|
78.7 |
% |
Noninterest income |
|
|
5,026 |
|
|
|
2,048 |
|
|
|
145.4 |
% |
Noninterest expense |
|
|
13,124 |
|
|
|
7,329 |
|
|
|
79.1 |
% |
|
|
|
Net income before income taxes |
|
|
8,196 |
|
|
|
3,839 |
|
|
|
113.5 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,594 |
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
111.4 |
% |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,602 |
|
|
$ |
2,612 |
|
|
|
114.5 |
% |
|
|
|
Net Interest Income. Net interest income represents the amount by which interest earned on
various earning assets exceeds interest paid on deposits and other interest bearing liabilities and
is the most significant component of our earnings. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, we
recorded net interest income of $17.1 million, which resulted in a net interest margin of 3.64%.
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, we recorded net interest income of $9.5 million, which
resulted in a net interest margin of 3.65%.
The following table sets forth the amount of our average balances, interest income or interest
expense for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the
average interest rate for total interest-earning assets and total interest-bearing liabilities, net
interest spread and net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (dollars
in thousands):
Page 27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rates/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rates/ |
|
|
|
Balances |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Yields |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Yields |
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
1,530,771 |
|
|
$ |
28,977 |
|
|
|
7.68 |
% |
|
$ |
761,326 |
|
|
$ |
13,179 |
|
|
|
7.02 |
% |
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
272,669 |
|
|
|
3,346 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
% |
|
|
241,750 |
|
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
% |
Tax-exempt (1) |
|
|
72,961 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
% |
|
|
44,571 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
% |
Federal funds sold and other |
|
|
55,897 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
|
27,238 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
5.53 |
% |
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
1,932,298 |
|
|
|
33,739 |
|
|
|
7.13 |
% |
|
|
1,074,885 |
|
|
|
16,811 |
|
|
|
6.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonearning assets |
|
|
217,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,149,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,153,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest checking |
|
$ |
244,680 |
|
|
$ |
1,957 |
|
|
|
3.24 |
% |
|
$ |
104,123 |
|
|
$ |
481 |
|
|
|
1.88 |
% |
Savings and money market |
|
|
495,877 |
|
|
|
4,125 |
|
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
344,852 |
|
|
|
2,350 |
|
|
|
2.76 |
% |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
624,092 |
|
|
|
7,456 |
|
|
|
4.84 |
% |
|
|
314,992 |
|
|
|
3,019 |
|
|
|
3.89 |
% |
|
|
|
Total interest bearing deposits |
|
|
1,364,649 |
|
|
|
13,538 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
% |
|
|
763,967 |
|
|
|
5,850 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
% |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
157,180 |
|
|
|
1,712 |
|
|
|
4.42 |
% |
|
|
59,723 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
3.46 |
% |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
and other borrowings |
|
|
40,241 |
|
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
5.36 |
% |
|
|
46,711 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
3.99 |
% |
Subordinated debt |
|
|
51,548 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
6.89 |
% |
|
|
30,929 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
6.36 |
% |
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,613,618 |
|
|
|
16,657 |
|
|
|
4.19 |
% |
|
|
901,330 |
|
|
|
7,304 |
|
|
|
3.29 |
% |
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
269,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits and interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,883,482 |
|
|
|
16,657 |
|
|
|
3.59 |
% |
|
|
1,053,577 |
|
|
|
7,304 |
|
|
|
2.81 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
6,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
259,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,149,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,153,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.10 |
% |
Net interest margin (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.65 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Yields computed on tax-exempt instruments on a tax equivalent basis. |
|
(2) |
|
Yields realized on interest-earning assets less the rates paid on interest-bearing
liabilities. |
|
(3) |
|
Net interest margin is the result of annualized net interest income calculated on a
tax-equivalent basis divided by average interest-earning assets for the period. |
Page 28
As noted above, the net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was 3.64%
compared to a net interest margin o f 3.65% for the same period in 2006. The net change in the net
interest margin was relatively minor because the net increases in the yield on interest-earning
assets between the two periods approximated the increases in the rate paid on deposits and
interest-bearing liabilities. Other matters related to the changes in net interest income, net
interest yields and rates, and net interest margin are presented below:
|
|
|
Our loan yields increased between 2007 and 2006 by 66 basis points. The pricing of
a large portion of our loan portfolio is tied to our prime rate. Our weighted average
prime rate for 2007 was 8.25% compared to 7.42% in 2006. The rates were higher in 2007 and
2006 due to periodic increases in our prime lending rate which moves in concert with the
Federal Reserves changes to its Federal funds rate. |
|
|
|
|
We have been able to grow our funding base significantly. For asset/liability
management purposes in 2007 and 2006, we elected to allocate a greater proportion of such
funds to our loan portfolio versus our securities and shorter-term investment portfolio.
For 2007, average loan balances were 71.2% of total assets compared to 66.0% in 2006.
Loans generally have higher yields than do securities and other shorter-term investments.
This change in allocation contributed to the increase in the overall total interest
earning asset yields between the two periods. |
|
|
|
|
During 2007, overall deposit rates were higher than those rates for the comparable
period in 2006. Changes in interest rates paid on such products as interest checking,
savings and money market accounts, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and
Federal funds purchased will generally increase or decrease in a manner that is consistent
with changes in the short-term rate environment. During 2007, as was the case with our
prime lending rate, short-term rates were higher than in 2006. We also monitor the pricing
of similar products by our primary competitors. The changes in the short-term rate
environment and the pricing of our primary competitors required us to increase these rates
in 2007 compared to the previous periods which resulted in increased rates paid on
interest bearing liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
During 2007, the average balances of noninterest bearing deposit balances, interest
bearing transaction accounts, savings and money market accounts and securities sold under
agreements to repurchase amounted to 62.0% of our total funding compared to 62.7% in 2006.
These funding sources generally have lower rates than do other funding sources, such as
certificates of deposit and other borrowings and, as a result, these matters contributed to
the decrease in our net interest spread in 2007 compared to 2006. |
|
|
|
|
Also impacting the net interest margin during 2007 compared to 2006 was pricing
of our floating rate subordinated indebtedness which comprises approximately $31 million
of the $52 million of subordinated indebtedness as of March 31, 2007. The interest rate
charged on this indebtedness is generally higher than other funding sources. The rate
charged on the floating rate portion of the indebtedness is determined in relation to the
three-month LIBOR index and reprices quarterly. During 2007, the short-term interest rate
environment was higher than previous years, and, as a result, the pricing for this funding
source was higher in 2007. |
There continues to be speculation in the marketplace as to the direction of interest rates and
whether the Federal Reserve will increase or decrease the Federal funds target rate from the
current 5.25%. As to intermediate and long-term rates, many economists are forecasting that these
rates should increase over the next several quarters such that the yield curve approaches a more
traditional position, however these forecasts are always accompanied by many qualifiers. As a
result, we are forecasting in our modeling that interest rates will remain stable over the next few
quarters.
The current inverted shape of the yield curve represents a challenge for most banks, including
Pinnacle. However, we believe we will increase net interest income through growth in earning
assets with continued emphasis on floating rate lending. The additional revenues provided by
increased floating rate loans may not be sufficient to overcome any immediate increases in funding
costs such that we are unable to maintain our current net interest margin. As a result, even though
our net interest income will likely increase, our net interest margins could decrease due to new
deposits being obtained at current market rates which are higher than our current average cost of
funding and the continued competitive deposit pricing in our market area. We believe our net
interest margin for the remainder of 2007 should be within a range of 3.60% to 3.70%, compared to
3.64% for the first quarter of 2007.
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses represents a charge to earnings necessary
to establish an allowance for loan losses that, in our managements evaluation, should be adequate
to provide coverage for the inherent losses on outstanding
Page 29
loans. The provision for loan losses amounted to $788,000 and $387,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Based upon our managements evaluation of the loan portfolio, we believe the allowance for loan
losses to be adequate to absorb our estimate of probable losses existing in the loan portfolio at
March 31, 2007. An increase in gross charge-offs and an increase in loan volumes were the primary
causes for the increase in our provision for loan losses in 2007 when compared to 2006.
Based upon managements assessment of the loan portfolio, we adjust our allowance for loan losses
to an amount deemed appropriate to adequately cover inherent risks in the loan portfolio. While our
policies and procedures used to estimate the allowance for loan losses, as well as the resultant
provision for loan losses charged to operations, are considered adequate by our management and are
reviewed from time to time by our regulators, they are necessarily approximate and imprecise. There
exist factors beyond our control, such as general economic conditions both locally and nationally,
which may negatively impact, materially, the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses and, thus,
the resulting provision for loan losses.
Noninterest Income. Our noninterest income is composed of several components, some of which vary
significantly between quarterly periods. Service charges on deposit accounts and other noninterest
income generally reflect our growth, while investment services and fees from the origination of
mortgage loans will often reflect market conditions and fluctuate from period to period. The
opportunities for recognition of gains on loans and loan participations sold and gains on sales of
investment securities ma y also vary widely from quarter to quarter and year to year.
The following is the makeup of our noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
2006 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
2007-2006 |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Percent |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
|
|
Noninterest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
1,797 |
|
|
$ |
438 |
|
|
|
310.3 |
% |
Investment services |
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
43.0 |
% |
Gains on sales of loans and loan participations, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees from the origination and sale of mortgage loans, net
of sales commissions |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
% |
Gains on loans and loan participations sold, net |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
(39.2 |
)% |
Insurance sales commissions |
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
140.4 |
% |
Trust fees |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
707.7 |
% |
Other noninterest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit fees |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
(54.9 |
)% |
Bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
273.0 |
% |
ATM, check card and merchant card fees |
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
8550 |
% |
Other noninterest income |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
43.0 |
% |
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
$ |
5,026 |
|
|
$ |
2,048 |
|
|
|
145.4 |
% |
|
|
|
Service charge income for 2007 increased over that of 2006 due to increased volumes from
our Rutherford County market and an increase in the number of Nashville deposit accounts
subject to service charges. However, for the Nashville accounts, the increase in service
charges in 2007 when compared to 2006 was offset by the earnings credit rate provided by
Pinnacle National to its commercial deposit customers. This earnings credit rate serves to
reduce the deposit service charges for our commercial customers and is based on the average
balances of their checking accounts at Pinnacle National. We increased the number of
customers subject to overdraft protection and we increased our per item insufficient fund
charge by approximately 12%, which also contributed to the increase in service charge revenue
in 2007.
Also included in noninterest income are commissions and fees from our financial advisory unit,
Pinnacle Asset Management, a division of Pinnacle National. At March 31, 2007, Pinnacle Asset
Management was receiving commissions and fees in connection with approximately $617 million in
brokerage assets held with Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. compared to $597 million at
December 31, 2006.
Additionally, following our merger with Cavalry, we now offer trust services through Pinnacle
Nationals trust division. At March 31, 2007, our trust department was receiving fees on
approximately $400 million in assets compared to $395 million at December 31, 2006. Also,
following our merger with Cavalry, we offer insurance services through Miller and Loughry
Insurance and Services, Inc. In the first quarter of 2007, we earned $637,000 for insurance
commissions compared to $265,000 for the period March 15, 2006 through March 31, 2006.
Page 30
Additionally, mortgage related fees for the first quarter also provided for a significant portion
of the increase in noninterest income between 2007 and 2006. These mortgage fees are for loans
originated in both the Nashville and Rutherford County markets that are subsequently sold to
third-party investors. All of these loan sales transfer servicing rights to the buyer. Generally,
mortgage origination fees increase in lower interest rate environments and decrease in rising
interest rate environments. As a result, mortgage origination fees may fluctuate greatly in
response to a changing rate environment.
We also sell certain commercial loan participations to our correspondent banks. Such sales are
primarily related to new lending transactions in excess of internal loan limits or industry
concentration limits. At March 31, 2007 and pursuant to participation agreements with these
correspondents, we had participated approximately $114.1 million of originated loans to these other
banks compared to $95.4 million at December 31, 2006. These participation agreements have various
provisions regarding collateral position, pricing and other matters. Many of these agreements
provide that we pay the correspondent less than the loans contracted interest rate. Pursuant to
SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125, in those transactions whereby the
correspondent is receiving a lesser amount of interest than the amount owed by the customer, we
record a net gain along with a corresponding asset representing the present value of our net
retained cash flows. The resulting asset is amortized over the term of the loan. Conversely, should
a loan be paid prior to maturity, any remaining unamortized asset is charged as a reduction to
gains on loan participations sold. We recorded gains, net of amortization expense related to the
aforementioned retained cash flow asset, of $45,000 and $74,000 during the three months ended March
31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, related to the loan participation transactions. We intend to
maintain relationships with our correspondents in order to sell participations in future loans to
these or other correspondents primarily due to limitations on loans to a single borrower or
industry concentrations. In general, the Cavalry merger has resulted in an increase in capital
which has resulted in increased lending limits for such items as loans to a single borrower and
loans to a single industry such that our need to participate such loans in the future may be
reduced. In any event, the timing of participations may cause the level of gains, if any, to vary
significantly.
Included in other noninterest income are miscellaneous consumer fees, such as ATM revenues,
merchant card and other electronic banking revenues. We experienced a significant increase in these
revenues in 2007 compared to 2006 due primarily to the merger with Cavalry.
Additionally, noninterest income from the cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance
increased significantly between 2007 and 2006. In connection with the Cavalry merger, we became
the owner and beneficiary of several life insurance policies on former Cavalry executives. These
policies were acquired by Cavalry in connection with a supplemental retirement plan for these
former Cavalry executives.
Additional
other noninterest income increased by approximately $78,000 during 2007 when compared
to 2006. Most of these revenues are for loan late charges and other fees.
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense consists of salaries and employee benefits, equipment and
occupancy expenses, and other operating expenses. The following is the makeup of our noninterest
expense for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):
Page 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
2007-2006 |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Percent |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
|
|
Noninterest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
$ |
5,507 |
|
|
$ |
2,614 |
|
|
|
110.7 |
% |
Commissions |
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
67.1 |
% |
Other compensation, primarily incentives |
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
52.8 |
% |
Employee benefits and other |
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
44.7 |
% |
|
|
|
Total salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
8,267 |
|
|
|
4,448 |
|
|
|
85.9 |
% |
|
|
|
Equipment and occupancy |
|
|
2,165 |
|
|
|
1,173 |
|
|
|
84.6 |
% |
Marketing and business development |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
% |
Postage and supplies |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
144.1 |
% |
Amortization of core deposit intangible |
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
290.9 |
% |
Other noninterest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting and auditing |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
)% |
Consultants, including independent loan review |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(31.4 |
)% |
Legal, including borrower-related charges |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
55.3 |
% |
Directors fees |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
% |
Insurance, including FDIC assessments |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
245.5 |
% |
Other noninterest expense |
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
137.4 |
% |
|
|
|
Total other noninterest expense |
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
94.4 |
% |
|
|
|
Merger related expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
$ |
13,124 |
|
|
$ |
7,329 |
|
|
|
79.1 |
% |
|
|
|
Expenses have generally increased between the above periods due to our merger with Cavalry,
personnel additions occurring throughout each period, the continued development of our branch
network and other expenses which increase in relation to our growth rate. We anticipate continued
increases in our expenses in the future for such items as additional personnel, the opening of
additional branches, audit expenses and other expenses which tend to increase in relation to our
growth. For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, approximately $467,000 and $187,000,
respectively, of compensation expense related to stock options and restricted share awards is
included in other incentive compensation expense.
At March 31, 2007, we employed 419.5 full time equivalent employees compared to 404.0 at December
31, 2006. We intend to continue to add employees in both the Nashville and Knoxville markets to our
work force for the foreseeable future, which will cause our salary costs to increase in future
periods.
We believe that variable pay incentives are a valuable tool in motivating an employee base that is
focused on providing our clients effective financial advice and increasing shareholder value. As a
result, and unlike many other financial institutions, substantially
all of our employees are eligible to participate in an annual cash incentive plan. Under the plan,
the targeted level of incentive
payments requires the Company to achieve a certain targeted earnings per share. To the extent that
actual earnings per share are above or below targeted earnings per share, the aggregate incentive
payments are increased or decreased.
Included in the salary and employee benefits amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
2006, were $590,000 and $480,000, respectively, related to variable cash awards. This expense will
fluctuate from year to year and quarter to quarter based on the estimation of achievement of
performance targets and the increase in the number of associates eligible to receive the award.
Based on our current earnings forecast for 2007, for the three months ended March 31, 2007, we have
anticipated a cash award to qualifying associates equal to 50% of their targeted award and
consequently we have recorded incentive expense of 50% of the targeted award for the first three
months of 2007. We will continue to review our anticipated 2007 cash incentive expense throughout
2007 which may require us to increase or decrease the anticipated award above or below the 50%
amount at March 31, 2007 based on the new estimate. For the three months ended March 31, 2006, the
anticipated award to
be paid to associates equaled 100% of their targeted award. The incentive plan for 2007 is
structured similarly to prior year plans in that the award is based on the achievement of soundness
and earnings objectives.
Page 32
Equipment and occupancy expenses in 2007 were greater than the 2006 amount by 85% due primarily to
the additional branches and equipment acquired with the Cavalry merger. We also opened an office in
the Donelson area of Nashville, Tennessee in the first quarter of 2007. These branch additions, and
our planned expansion into the Knoxville market, will contribute toward an increase in our
equipment and occupancy expenses throughout 2007 and future periods.
Marketing and other business development and postage and supplies expenses are higher in 2007
compared to 2006 and due to increases in the number of customers and prospective customers;
increases in the number of customer contact personnel and the corresponding increases in customer
entertainment; and other business development expenses. The addition of customers from the Cavalry
merger had a direct impact on these increased charges.
Included in noninterest expense for 2007 and 2006 is $516,000 and $132,000, respectively of
amortization of the core deposit intangible. This identified intangible is being amortized over
seven years using an accelerated method which anticipates the life of the underlying deposits to
which the intangible is attributable. Amortization expense associated with the core deposit
intangible will approximate $1.8 million to $2.1 million per year for the next four years with
lesser amounts for the remaining two years. Additionally, for the three months ended March 31,
2006, we incurred $443,000 of merger related expenses directly associated with the Cavalry merger.
The merger related charges consisted of integration costs incurred in connection with the merger,
including accelerated depreciation associated with software and other technology assets whose
useful lives were shortened as a result of the
Cavalry acquisition. We do not anticipate any additional merger related expenses associated with
the Cavalry transaction in 2007.
Other noninterest expenses increased 94% in 2007 over 2006. Most of these increases are
attributable to increased legal fees and insurance expenses. Also contributing to the increases in
2006 are incidental variable costs related to deposit gathering and lending. Examples include
expenses related to ATM networks, correspondent bank service charges, check losses, appraisal
expenses, closing attorney expenses and other items which have increased significantly as a result
of the Cavalry merger.
Our efficiency ratio (ratio of noninterest expense to the sum of net interest income and
noninterest income) was 59.4% for the first three months of 2007 compared to 63.4% in 2006. The
efficiency ratio measures the amount of expense that is incurred to generate a dollar of revenue.
Financial Condition
Our consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2007 reflects organic growth since December 31, 2006.
Total assets grew to $2.193 billion at March 31, 2007 from $2.142 billion at December 31, 2006.
Loans. The composition of loans at March 31, 2007 and at December 31, 2006 and the percentage (%)
of each classification to total loans are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate Mortgage |
|
$ |
287,498 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
% |
|
$ |
284,302 |
|
|
19.0 |
% |
|
Commercial real estate Construction |
|
|
160,222 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
161,903 |
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
Commercial Other |
|
|
665,857 |
|
|
|
42.8 |
% |
|
|
608,530 |
|
|
40.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
1,113,577 |
|
|
|
71.6 |
% |
|
|
1,054,735 |
|
|
70.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Consumer real estate Mortgage |
|
|
301,525 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
299,627 |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
Consumer real estate Construction |
|
|
92,162 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
91,194 |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
Consumer Other |
|
|
46,716 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
52,179 |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
440,403 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
% |
|
|
443,000 |
|
|
29.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
1,553,980 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,497,735 |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
As noted above, we have increased the percentage of our outstanding loans in commercial versus
commercial and consumer real estate during the three months ended March 31, 2007. Over the
last few quarters, we have noted decreases in the number of real estate lending opportunities,
particularly real estate construction lending, primarily due to the broader economy and
developers avoiding increases in inventories. We will continue to pursue quality real estate
lending opportunities. These types of loans require that we maintain effective credit and
construction monitoring systems. Also and as a result of the Cavalry merger, we have increased
our resources in this area such that we believe we can effectively manage this area of
exposure through utilization of experienced professionals who are well-trained in this type
of lending and who have significant experience in our geographic market.
Page 33
We periodically analyze our commercial loan portfolio to determine if a concentration of credit
risk exists to any one or more industries. We use broadly accepted industry classification systems
in order to classify borrowers into various industry classifications. As a result, we have a credit
exposure (loans outstanding plus unfunded commitments) exceeding 25% of Pinnacle Nationals total
risk-based capital to borrowers in the following industries at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
Unfunded |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Exposure at |
|
|
Balances |
|
Commitments |
|
Total exposure |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Trucking industry |
|
$ |
61,441 |
|
|
$ |
23,382 |
|
|
$ |
84,823 |
|
|
$ |
89,862 |
|
Lessors of nonresidential buildings |
|
|
123,740 |
|
|
|
17,033 |
|
|
|
140,773 |
|
|
|
133,504 |
|
Lessors of residential buildings |
|
|
64,320 |
|
|
|
6,970 |
|
|
|
71,290 |
|
|
|
65,791 |
|
Land subdividers |
|
|
117,113 |
|
|
|
41,825 |
|
|
|
158,938 |
|
|
|
164,535 |
|
New housing operative builders |
|
|
126,084 |
|
|
|
67,133 |
|
|
|
193,217 |
|
|
|
192,373 |
|
The following table classifies our fixed and variable rate loans at March 31, 2007 according to
contractual maturities of (1) one year or less, (2) after one year through five years, and (3)
after five years. The table also classifies our variable rate loans pursuant to the contractual
repricing dates of the underlying loans (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
Variable |
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, |
|
At December 31, |
|
|
Rates |
|
Rates |
|
Totals |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Based on contractual maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year |
|
$ |
81,960 |
|
|
$ |
579,683 |
|
|
$ |
661,643 |
|
|
|
42.6 |
% |
|
|
40.9 |
% |
Due in one year to five years |
|
|
459,264 |
|
|
|
144,354 |
|
|
|
603,618 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
% |
|
|
39.9 |
% |
Due after five years |
|
|
80,604 |
|
|
|
208,115 |
|
|
|
288,719 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
% |
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
621,828 |
|
|
$ |
932,152 |
|
|
$ |
1,553,980 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on contractual repricing dates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily floating rate |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
715,931 |
|
|
$ |
715,931 |
|
|
|
46.1 |
% |
|
|
46.1 |
% |
Due within one year |
|
|
81,960 |
|
|
|
137,496 |
|
|
|
219,456 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
% |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
Due in one year to five years |
|
|
459,264 |
|
|
|
66,569 |
|
|
|
525,833 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
% |
|
|
34.2 |
% |
Due after five years |
|
|
80,604 |
|
|
|
12,156 |
|
|
|
92,760 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
621,828 |
|
|
$ |
932,152 |
|
|
$ |
1,553,980 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
The above information does not consider the impact of scheduled principal payments. Daily floating
rate loans are tied to Pinnacle Nationals prime lending rate or a national interest rate index
with the underlying loan rates changing in relation to changes in these indexes.
Non-Performing Assets. The specific economic and credit risks associated with our loan
portfolio include, but are not limited to, a general downturn in the economy which could affect
employment rates in our market area, general real estate market deterioration, interest rate
fluctuations, deteriorated or non-existent collateral, title defects, inaccurate appraisals,
financial deterioration of borrowers, fraud, and any violation of laws and regulations.
We attempt to reduce these economic and credit risks by adherence to loan to value guidelines for
collateralized loans, by investigating the creditworthiness of the borrower and by monitoring the
borrowers financial position. Also, we establish and periodically review our lending policies and
procedures. Banking regulations limit our exposure by prohibiting loan relationships that exceed
15% of Pinnacle Nationals statutory capital in the case of loans that are not fully secured by
readily marketable or other permissible types of collateral. Furthermore, we have an internal limit
for aggregate indebtedness to a single borrower of $15 million. Our loan policy requires that our
board of directors approve any relationships that exceed this internal limit.
We discontinue the accrual of interest income when (1) there is a significant deterioration in the
financial condition of the borrower and full repayment of principal and interest is not expected or
(2) the principal or
interest is more than 90 days past due, unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of
collection. At March 31, 2007, we had $4,774,000 in loans on nonaccrual compared to $7,070,000 at
December 31, 2006. The decrease in nonperforming loans between March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was
primarily related to borrower payments received during the three months ended March 31,
2007.
Page 34
At March 31, 2007, we owned $858,000 in real estate which we had acquired, usually through
foreclosure, from borrowers compared to $995,000 at December 31, 2006. Substantially all of this
amount relates to homes that are in various stages of construction for which we believe we have
adequate collateral.
There were $98,000 of other loans 90 past due and still accruing interest at March 31, 2007
compared to $737,000 at December 31 , 2006. At March 31, 2007 and at December 31, 2006, no loans
were deemed to be restructured loans. The following table is a summary of our nonperforming assets
at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Mar. 31, |
|
At Dec. 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans (1) |
|
$ |
4,774 |
|
|
$ |
7,070 |
|
Restructured loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
|
5,632 |
|
|
|
8,065 |
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets and accruing loans past due 90 days or
more |
|
$ |
5,730 |
|
|
$ |
8,802 |
|
|
|
|
Total loans outstanding |
|
$ |
1,553,980 |
|
|
$ |
1,497,735 |
|
|
|
|
Ratio of nonperforming assets and accruing loans past due 90 days
or more to total loans outstanding at end of period |
|
|
0.37 |
% |
|
|
0.59 |
% |
|
|
|
Ratio of nonperforming assets and accruing loans past 90 days or
more to total allowance for loan losses at end of period |
|
|
34.12 |
% |
|
|
54.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest income that would have been recorded during the three months ended March 31,
2007 related to nonaccrual loans was $102,000. Potential problem assets, which are not included in nonperforming assets, amounted to
approximately $5.1 million or 0.21% of total loans outstanding at March 31, 2007, compared to $6.0
million, or 0.24% of total loans outstanding at December 31, 2006. |
Potential problem assets represent those assets with a potential weakness or a well-defined
weakness and where information about possible credit problems of borrowers has caused management to
have serious doubts about the borrowers ability to comply with present repayment terms. This
definition is believed to be substantially consistent with the standards established by the OCC,
Pinnacle Nationals primary regulator for loans classified as substandard.
Allowance for Loan Losses (allowance). We maintain the allowance at a level that our management
deems appropriate to adequately cover the inherent risks in the loan portfolio. As of March 31,
2007 and December 31, 2006, our allowance for loan losses was $16,792,000 and $16,118,000,
respectively, which our management deemed to be adequate at each of the respective dates. The
increase in our allowance was primarily the result of increases in loan balances and net
charge-offs for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The judgments and estimates associated with
our allowance determination are described under Critical Accounting Estimates above.
Approximately 71.6% of our loan portfolio at March 31, 2007 consisted of commercial loans compared
to 70.4% at December 31, 2006. The following table sets forth, based on managements best estimate,
the allocation of the allowance to types of loans as well as the unallocated portion as of March
31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and the percentage of loans in each category to the total loans
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|
|
Commercial real estate Mortgage |
|
$ |
4,538 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
% |
|
$ |
4,550 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
% |
Commercial real estate Construction |
|
|
2,529 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
2,591 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
Commercial Other |
|
|
6,873 |
|
|
|
42.8 |
% |
|
|
6,517 |
|
|
|
40.6 |
% |
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
13,940 |
|
|
|
71.6 |
% |
|
|
13,658 |
|
|
|
70.4 |
% |
|
|
|
Consumer real estate Mortgage |
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
% |
Consumer real estate Construction |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
Consumer Other |
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
% |
|
|
2,061 |
|
|
|
29.6 |
% |
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
996 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
16,792 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
16,118 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
Page 35
The following is a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the ratio of the allowance for
loan losses to total loans as of the end of each period (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Mar. 31, |
|
At Dec. 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
16,118 |
|
|
$ |
7,858 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
3,732 |
|
Allowance acquired in Cavalry acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,102 |
|
Charged-off loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate Mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Other |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(436 |
) |
Consumer real estate Mortgage |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
Consumer real estate Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Other |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(336 |
) |
|
|
|
Total charged-off loans |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(818 |
) |
|
|
|
Recoveries of previously charged-off loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate Mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate Construction |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Other |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
Consumer real estate Mortgage |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer real estate Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Other |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries of previously charged-off loans |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs) recoveries |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(574 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
16,792 |
|
|
$ |
16,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans outstanding at end of period |
|
|
1.08 |
% |
|
|
1.08 |
% |
|
|
|
Ratio of net charge-offs (*) to average loans outstanding for the period |
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
0.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Net charge-offs for the three months ended March 31, 2007 have been annualized. |
As a relatively new institution, we (excluding the impact of Cavalry), do not have extensive
loss experience comparable to more mature financial institutions; however, as our loan portfolio
matures, we will have additional charge-offs as our losses materialize. We consider the amount and
nature of our charge-offs in determining the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses.
Investments. Our investment portfolio, consisting primarily of Federal agency bonds, state and
municipal securities and mortgage-backed securities, amounted to $340 million and $346 million at
March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. Our investment portfolio serves many purposes
including serving as a stable source of income, collateral for public funds and as a liquidity
source. A statistical comparison of our entire investment portfolio at March 31, 2007 and at
December 31, 2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Weighted average life |
|
4. 79 |
years |
|
4.93 |
years |
Weighted average coupon |
|
|
4.84 |
% |
|
|
4.85 |
% |
Tax equivalent yield |
|
|
5.01 |
% |
|
|
5.01 |
% |
Deposits and Other Borrowings. We had approximately $1.700 billion of deposits at March 31,
2007 compared to $1.622 billion at December 31, 2006. Our deposits consist of noninterest and
interest-bearing demand accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts and time deposits.
Additionally, we entered into agreements with certain customers to sell certain of our
securities under agreements to repurchase the security the following day. These agreements
(which are typically associated with comprehensive treasury management programs for our
clients and provide them with short-term returns for their excess funds) amounted to $117.0
Page 36
million at March 31, 2007 and $141.0 million at December 31, 2006. Additionally, at March 31, 2007,
we had borrowed $26.7 million in advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati compared to
$53.7 million at December 31, 2006.
Generally, banks classify their funding base as either core funding or non-core funding. Core
funding consists of all deposits other than time deposits issued in denominations of $100,000 or
greater while all other funding is deemed to be non-core. The following table represents the
balances of our deposits and other fundings and the percentage of each type to the total at March
31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Percent |
|
2006 |
|
Percent |
|
|
|
Core funding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposit accounts |
|
|
306,885 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
$ |
300,978 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
% |
Interest-bearing demand accounts |
|
|
249,692 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
236,674 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
Savings and money market accounts |
|
|
499,476 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
% |
|
|
485,936 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
% |
Time deposit accounts less than $100,000 |
|
|
147,055 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
158,687 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
|
Total core funding |
|
|
1,203,108 |
|
|
|
62.8 |
% |
|
|
1,182,275 |
|
|
|
63.3 |
% |
|
|
|
Non-core funding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposit accounts greater than $100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public funds |
|
|
98,205 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
98,286 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
Brokered deposits |
|
|
99,140 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
61,718 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
Other time deposits |
|
|
299,679 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
|
280,132 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
% |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
116,952 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
141,016 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
46,619 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
53,726 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
Subordinated debt |
|
|
51,548 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
51,548 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
|
Total non-core funding |
|
|
712,143 |
|
|
|
37.2 |
% |
|
|
686,426 |
|
|
|
36.7 |
% |
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
1,915,251 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,868,701 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
Subordinated debt. On December 29, 2003, we established PNFP Statutory Trust I; on September
15, 2005 we established PNFP Statutory Trust II; and on September 7, 2006 we established PNFP
Statutory Trust III (Trust I; Trust II; Trust III or collectively, the Trusts). All are
wholly-owned statutory business trusts. We are the sole sponsor of the Trusts and acquired each
Trusts common securities for $310,000; $619,000 and $619,000, respectively. The Trusts were
created for the exclusive purpose of issuing 30-year capital trust preferred securities (Trust
Preferred Securities) in the aggregate amount of $10,000,000 for Trust I; $20,000,000 for Trust II
and $20,000,000 for Trust III and using the proceeds to acquire junior subordinated debentures
(Subordinated Debentures) issued by Pinnacle Financial. The sole assets of the Trusts are the
Subordinated Debentures. Our $1,548,000 investment in the Trusts is included in investments in
unconsolidated
subsidiaries in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and our $51,548,000 obligation is
reflected as subordinated debt.
The Trust I Preferred Securities bear a floating interest rate based on a spread over 3-month
LIBOR (8.15% at March 31, 2007) which is set each quarter and matures on December 30, 2033. The
Trust II Preferred Securities bear a fixed interest rate of 5. 848% per annum thru September 30,
2010 after which time the securities will bear a floating rate set each quarter based on a spread
over 3-month LIBOR. The Trust II securities mature on September 30, 2035. The Trust III Preferred
Securities bear a floating interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR (7.00% at March 31,
2007) which is set each quarter and mature on September 30, 2036.
Distributions are payable quarterly. The Trust Preferred Securities are subject to mandatory
redemption upon repayment of the Subordinated Debentures at their stated maturity date or their
earlier redemption in an amount equal to their liquidation amount plus accumulated and unpaid
distributions to the date of redemption. We guarantee the payment of distributions and payments for
redemption or liquidation of the Trust Preferred Securities to the extent of funds held by the
Trusts. Pinnacle Financials obligations under the Subordinated Debentures together with the
guarantee and other back-up obligations, in the aggregate, constitute a full and unconditional
guarantee by Pinnacle Financial of the obligations of the Trusts under the Trust Preferred
Securities.
The Subordinated Debentures are unsecured, bear interest at a rate equal to the rates paid by
the Trusts on the Trust Preferred Securities and mature on the same dates as those noted above for the Trust Preferred
Securities. Interest is payable quarterly. We may defer the payment of interest at any time
for a period not exceeding 20 consecutive quarters provided that the deferral period
Page 37
does not extend past the stated maturity. During any such deferral period, distributions on the
Trust Preferred Securities will also be deferred and our ability to pay dividends on our common
shares will be restricted.
Subject to approval by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, the Trust Preferred Securities
may be redeemed prior to maturity at our option on or after
September 17, 2008 for Trust I; on or
after September 30, 2010 for Trust II and September 30, 2011 for Trust III. The Trust Preferred
Securities may also be redeemed at any time in whole (but not in part) in the event of unfavorable
changes in laws or regulations that result in (1) the Trust becoming subject to Federal income tax
on income received on the Subordinated Debentures, (2) interest payable by the parent company on
the Subordinated Debentures becoming non-deductible for Federal tax purposes, (3) the requirement
for the Trust to register under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or (4) loss of the
ability to treat the Trust Preferred Securities as Tier I capital under the Federal Reserve
capital adequacy guidelines.
The Trust Preferred Securities for the Trusts qualify as Tier I capital under current
regulatory definitions subject to certain limitations.
Capital Resources. At March 31, 2007 and December 1, 2006, our stockholders equity amounted to
$262.9 million and $256.0 million, respectively, or an increase of $6.9 million. This increase was
primarily attributable to $6.0 million in comprehensive income, which was composed of $5.6 million
in net income together with $382,000 of net unrealized holding gains associated with our
available-for-sale portfolio.
Dividends. Pinnacle National is subject to restrictions on the payment of dividends to Pinnacle
Financial under Federal banking laws and the regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency. We, in turn, are also subject to limits on payment of dividends to our shareholders by
the rules, regulations and policies of Federal banking authorities and the laws of the State of
Tennessee. We have not paid any dividends to date, nor do we anticipate paying dividends to our
shareholders for the foreseeable future. Future dividend policy will depend on Pinnacle Nationals
earnings, capital position, financial condition and other factors.
Market and Liquidity Risk Management
Our objective is to manage assets and liabilities to provide a satisfactory, consistent level of
profitability within the framework of established liquidity, loan, investment, borrowing, and
capital policies. Our Asset Liability Management Committee (ALCO) is charged with the
responsibility of monitoring these policies, which are designed to ensure acceptable composition of
asset/liability mix. Two critical areas of focus for ALCO are interest rate sensitivity and
liquidity risk management.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. In the normal course of business, we are exposed to market risk arising
from fluctuations in interest rates. ALCO measures and evaluates the interest rate risk so that we
can meet customer demands for various types of loans and deposits. ALCO determines the most
appropriate amounts of on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet items. Measurements which we use to
help us manage interest rate sensitivity include an earnings simulation model and an economic value
of equity model. These measurements are used in conjunction with competitive pricing analysis.
Earnings simulation model. We believe that interest rate risk is best measured by our earnings
simulation modeling.
Forecasted levels of earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities, and off-balance sheet
financial instruments are combined with ALCO forecasts of interest rates for the next 12
months and are combined with other factors in order to produce various earnings simulations.
To limit interest rate risk, we have guidelines for our earnings at risk which seek to limit
the variance of net interest income to less than a 20 percent decline for a 300 basis point
change up or down in rates from managements flat interest rate forecast over the next
twelve months; to less than a 10 percent decline for a 200 basis point change up or down in
rates from managements flat interest rate forecast over the next twelve months; and to less
than a 5 percent decline for a 100 basis point change up or down in rates from managements
flat interest rate forecast over the next twelve months. The results of our current
simulation model would indicate that we are in compliance with our current guidelines at
March 31, 2007.
Economic value of equity. Our economic value of equity model measures the extent that
estimated
economic values of our assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items will change as a
result of interest rate changes. Economic values are determined by discounting expected
cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items, which establishes a base
case economic value of equity. To help limit interest rate risk, we have a guideline
stating that for an instantaneous 300 basis point change in interest rates up or down, the
economic value of equity will not decrease by more than 30 percent from the base case; for
a 200 basis point instantaneous change in interest rates up or down, the economic value of
equity will not decrease by more than 20 percent; and for a 100 basis point instantaneous
change in interest rates up or down, the economic value of equity will not decrease by
more than 10 percent. The results of our current economic value of equity model would
indicate that we are in compliance with our current guidelines at March 31, 2007.
Page 38
Each of the above analyses may not, on its own, be an accurate indicator of how our net interest
income will be affected by changes in interest rates. Income associated with interest-earning
assets and costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities may not be affected uniformly by
changes in interest rates. In addition, the magnitude and duration of changes in interest rates may
have a significant impact on net interest income. For example, although certain assets and
liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of repricing, they may react in different
degrees to changes in market interest rates. Interest rates on certain types of assets and
liabilities fluctuate in advance of changes in general market rates, while interest rates on other
types may lag behind changes in general market rates. In addition, certain assets, such as
adjustable rate mortgage loans, have features (generally referred to as interest rate caps and
floors) which limit changes in interest rates. Prepayment and early withdrawal levels also could
deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the maturity of certain instruments. The
ability of many borrowers to service their debts also may decrease during periods of rising
interest rates. ALCO reviews each of the above interest rate sensitivity analyses along with
several different interest rate scenarios as part of its responsibility to provide a satisfactory,
consistent level of profitability within the framework of established liquidity, loan, investment,
borrowing, and capital policies.
We may also use derivative financial instruments to improve the balance between interest-sensitive
assets and interest-sensitive liabilities and as one tool to manage our interest rate sensitivity
while continuing to meet the credit and deposit needs of our customers. At March 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, we had not entered into any derivative contracts to assist managing our interest
rate sensitivity.
Liquidity Risk Management. The purpose of liquidity risk management is to ensure that there are
sufficient cash flows to satisfy loan demand, deposit withdrawals, and our other needs. Traditional
sources of liquidity for a bank include asset maturities and growth in core deposits. A bank may
achieve its desired liquidity objectives from the management of its assets and liabilities and by
internally generated funding through its operations. Funds invested in marketable instruments that
can be readily sold and the continuous maturing of other earning assets are sources of liquidity
from an asset perspective. The liability base provides sources of liquidity through attraction of
increased deposits and borrowing funds from various other institutions.
Changes in interest rates also affect our liquidity position. We currently price deposits in
response to market rates and our management intends to continue this policy. If deposits are not
priced in response to market rates, a loss of deposits could occur which would negatively affect
our liquidity position.
Scheduled loan payments are a relatively stable source of funds, but loan payoffs and deposit flows
fluctuate significantly, being influenced by interest rates, general economic conditions and
competition. Additionally, debt security investments are subject to prepayment and call provisions
that could accelerate their payoff prior to stated maturity. We attempt to price our deposit
products to meet our asset/liability objectives consistent with local market conditions. Our ALCO
is responsible for monitoring our ongoing liquidity needs. Our regulators also monitor our
liquidity and capital resources on a periodic basis.
In addition, Pinnacle National is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati. As a
result, Pinnacle National receive s advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati,
pursuant to the terms of various borrowing agreements, which assist it in the funding of its home
mortgage and commercial real estate loan portfolios. Pinnacle National has pledged under the
borrowing agreements with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati certain qualifying residential
mortgage loans and, pursuant to a blanket lien, all qualifying commercial mortgage loans as
collateral. At March 31, 2007, Pinnacle National had received advances from the Federal Home Loan
Bank of Cincinnati totaling $26.7 million at the following rates and maturities (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Interest Rates |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
% |
2008 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
4.97 |
% |
2009 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
% |
Thereafter |
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
26,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2007, brokered certificates of deposit approximated $99.1 million which
represented 5.2% of total fundings compared to $61.7 million and 3.3% at December 31, 2006. We
issue these brokered certificates through several different brokerage houses based on
competitive bid. Typically, these funds
are for varying maturities from six months to two years and are issued at rates which are
competitive to rates we would be required to pay to attract similar deposits from the local
market as well as rates for Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati advances of similar
maturities. We consider these deposits to be a ready source of liquidity under current market
conditions.
At March 31, 2007, we had no significant commitments for capital expenditures. However, we are
in the process of developing our branch network or other office facilities in the Nashville
MSA and the Knoxville MSA. As a result, we anticipate that we will enter into contracts to buy
property or construct branch facilities and/or lease agreements to lease facilities in the
Nashville MSA and Knoxville MSA.
Page 39
Our management believes that we have adequate liquidity to meet all known contractual obligations
and unfunded commitments, including loan commitments and reasonable borrower, depositor, and
creditor requirements over the next twelve months.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. At March 31, 2007, we had outstanding standby letters of credit of
$54.8 million and unfunded loan commitments outstanding of $510.6 million. Because these
commitments generally have fixed expiration dates and many will expire without being drawn upon,
the total commitment level does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. If needed to
fund these outstanding commitments, Pinnacle National has the ability to liquidate Federal funds
sold or securities available-for- sale, or on a short-term basis to borrow and purchase Federal
funds from other financial institutions.
At March 31, 2007, Pinnacle National had accommodations with upstream correspondent banks for
unsecured short-term advances. These accommodations have various covenants related to their term
and availability, and in most cases must be repaid within less than a month.
Impact of Inflation
The consolidated financial statements and related consolidated financial data presented herein have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and
practices within the banking industry which require the measurement of financial position and
operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the changes in the relative
purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually
all the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result,
interest rates have a more significant impact on a financial institutions performance than the
effects of general levels of inflation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements SFAS No. 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies only to fair-value
measurements that are already required or permitted by other accounting standards and is expected
to increase the consistency of those measurements. The definition of fair value focuses on the exit
price, i.e., the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, not the entry price,
i.e., the price that would be paid to ac quire the asset or received to assume the liability at the
measurement date. The statement emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement not an
entity-specific measurement. Therefore, the fair value measurement should be determined based on
the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The effective
date for SFAS No. 157 is for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods
within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 157 on its
consolidated financial statements.
In February of 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 159 (SFAS
159), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which gives entities
the option to measure eligible financial assets, and financial liabilities at fair value on an
instrument by instrument basis, that are otherwise not permitted to be accounted for at fair value
under other accounting standards. The election to use the fair value option is available when an
entity first recognizes a financial asset or financial liability. Subsequent changes in fair value
must be recorded in earnings. This statement is effective as of the beginning of a companys
first fiscal year after November 15, 2007. We are in the process of analyzing the impact of SFAS
159.
Page 40
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information required by this Item 3 is included on pages 37 through 39 of Part I Item 2
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Pinnacle Financial maintains disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by it in the reports that it files or submits
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to Pinnacle Financials management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Pinnacle
Financial carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its
management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the
end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of these disclosure controls
and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that Pinnacle
Financials disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Controls
There were no changes in Pinnacle Financials internal control over financial reporting during
Pinnacle Financials fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, Pinnacle Financials internal control over financial
reporting.
Page 41
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a
party or of which any of their property is the subject.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Except as disclosed below, there have been no material changes to our risk
factors as previously disclosed in Part I, Item IA of our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
We may not be able to expand into the Knoxville market in the time frame and at
the levels that we currently expect and our projected expansion will reduce our
net income for the 2007 fiscal year.
In order to expand our operations into the Knoxville market we will be required to
hire a significant number of new associates and build out a branch network. We can
not assure you that we will be able to hire the number of experienced associates that
we need to successfully execute our strategy in the Knoxville market, nor can we
assure you that the associates that we hire will be able to successfully execute our
growth strategy in that market. Because we seek to hire experienced associates, the
compensation cost associated with these individuals may be higher than that of other
financial institutions of similar size in the market. If we are unable to grow our
loan portfolio at planned rates, the increased compensation expense of these
experienced associates may negatively impact our results of operations. Because there
will be a period of time before we are able to fully deploy our resources in the
Knoxville market, our start up costs, including the cost of our associates and our
branch expansion, will negatively impact our results of operations. In addition, if
we are not able to expand our branch footprint in the Knoxville market in the time
period that we have targeted, our results of operations may be negatively impacted.
Execution of our growth plans in the Knoxville market also depends on continued
growth in the Knoxville economy.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|
(a) |
|
Not applicable |
|
|
(b) |
|
Not applicable |
|
|
(c) |
|
The Company did not repurchase any shares of the Companys common
stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2007. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None
Page 42
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
31.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
Pinnacle Financial is a party to certain agreements entered into in connection
with the offering by PNFP Statutory Trust I, PNFP Statutory Trust II and PNFP
Statutory Trust III of an aggregate of $50,000,000 in trust preferred securities,
as more fully described in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In accordance with
Item 601(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation SB, and because the total amount of the trust
preferred securities is not in excess of 10% of Pinnacle Financials total
assets, Pinnacle Financial has not filed the various documents and agreements
associated with the trust preferred securities herewith. Pinnacle Financial has,
however, agreed to furnish copies of the various documents and agreements
associated with the trust preferred securities to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request.
Page 43
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ M. Terry Turner |
|
|
|
|
M. Terry Turner
|
|
|
May 3, 2007
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Harold R. Carpenter |
|
|
|
|
Harold R. Carpenter
|
|
|
May 3, 2007
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Page 44