Edgar Filing: AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS LTD

AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007

“OR”


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO .

Commission File Number 1-14795

AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


Bermuda (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)		Not Applicable (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

The Boyle Building, 2^nd Floor
31 Queen Street
Hamilton HM 11 Bermuda
(Address, zip code of principal executive offices)

(441) 296-8560
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one)


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer þ		Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No

The aggregate number of shares outstanding of Registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value, on November 5, 2007 was 10,722,757.

AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS


			Page
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Financial Statements		1
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		16
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks		27
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		27

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		29
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors		30
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		36
	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		36
	Item 5.	Other Information		36
	Item 6.	Exhibits		i
EX-11 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
EX-31.1 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO
EX-31.2 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO
EX-32.1 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO
EX-32.2 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets


	September 30,		December 31,
	2007		2006
	(Unaudited)
Assets

Investments:
Fixed maturity securities available for sale	$	535,330,483	$	490,031,666
Common stock, at fair value		20,814,079		12,402,957
Preferred stock, at fair value		6,592,888		8,118,060
Short-term investments		28,598,329		40,605,672


Total investments		591,335,779		551,158,355

Cash and cash equivalents		23,545,326		11,293,296
Accrued investment income		5,381,638		4,299,678
Premiums receivable		31,351,908		21,747,908
Ceded unearned premium		30,262,974		35,897,446
Reinsurance recoverable		173,155,700		185,010,493
Deferred income taxes		10,585,502		10,115,869
Deferred policy acquisition costs		15,395,120		12,402,764
Property, plant and equipment		8,746,607		5,644,629
Other assets		9,182,239		9,560,230


Total assets	$	898,942,793	$	847,130,668

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

- 1 -


	September 30,		December 31,
	2007		2006
	(Unaudited)
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

Liabilities:
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses	$	476,863,098	$	439,673,496
Unearned premiums		110,651,542		115,197,804
Ceded premiums payable		21,031,030		25,462,908
Deferred Revenues		975,196		1,192,705
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		8,724,490		11,810,962
Deferred rent		1,818,919		—
Loans payable		38,514,309		38,138,804
Funds held		17,182,882		16,328,609
Minority Interest		3,295,341		3,175,200


Total liabilities		679,056,807		650,980,488


Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 5,000,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding		—		—
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 30,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding at September 30, 2007, 10,718,257 and December 31, 2006, 10,554,200 shares		107,182		105,542
Additional paid-in capital		106,548,122		104,514,200
Retained earnings		112,399,567		90,989,550
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net		831,115		540,888

Total shareholders’ equity		219,885,986		196,150,180


Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	898,942,793	$	847,130,668

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

- 2 -

American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(unaudited)


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Revenues:
Direct premiums earned	$	52,211,331		$	55,588,691		$	162,613,244		$	164,663,077
Assumed premiums earned		2,372,544			135,000			5,537,696			135,000
Ceded premiums earned		(18,012,022	)		(17,152,022	)		(53,810,894	)		(56,271,814	)

Net premiums earned		36,571,853			38,571,669			114,340,046			108,526,263

Net investment income		7,790,710			6,001,675			22,496,605			15,271,388
Net realized (losses) gains		(80,852	)		(8,692	)		(88,624	)		351,123
Fee income		411,129			450,365			1,675,047			1,317,275
Other income		17,873			5,966			50,049			36,564

Total revenues		44,710,713			45,020,983			138,473,123			125,502,613


Expenses:
Losses and loss adjustment expenses		21,012,676			23,526,279			68,586,303			66,693,776
Acquisition expenses		7,185,279			7,038,445			21,031,182			20,460,863
Payroll and related expenses		4,319,713			4,360,605			12,995,958			11,894,758
Real estate expenses		25,077			54,979			319,211			224,480
Other expenses		3,440,634			3,422,802			9,579,215			9,037,918
Interest expense		846,109			838,999			2,484,275			2,579,668
Minority interest		26,178			48,102			150,266			(463,528	)

Total expenses		36,855,666			39,290,211			115,146,410			110,427,935


Earnings before income taxes		7,855,047			5,730,772			23,326,713			15,074,678
Income taxes		808,906			343,151			1,916,696			958,926

Net earnings	$	7,046,141		$	5,387,621		$	21,410,017		$	14,115,752


Net earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.66		$	0.52		$	2.02		$	1.74

Diluted	$	0.64		$	0.50		$	1.95		$	1.67


Weighted Average number of shares outstanding:
Basic		10,709,996			10,438,692			10,624,416			8,116,056

Diluted		11,044,340			10,782,087			10,938,607			8,477,697

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

- 3 -

American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow
(unaudited)


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2007			2006
	(unaudited)
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net earnings	$	21,410,017		$	14,115,752
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Realized losses (gains) on investments		88,624			(351,123	)
Depreciation expense		2,080,462			1,423,513
Noncash rent expense		409,579			—
Stock based compensation expense		394,779			453,710
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs, net		(2,992,356	)		(1,279,546	)
Amortization of premiums on investments		328,207			1,279,296
Deferred income taxes		(40,717	)		(338,493	)
Change in:
Accrued investment income		(1,081,960	)		(897,274	)
Premiums receivable		(9,604,000	)		(2,899,871	)
Reinsurance recoverable		11,854,793			10,197,519
Ceded unearned premiums		5,634,472			(2,832,328	)
Funds held		854,273			4,213,801
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses		37,189,602			15,079,263
Unearned premiums		(4,546,262	)		11,040,179
Ceded premiums payable		(4,431,878	)		447,900
Deferred revenues		(217,509	)		(353,295	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(2,846,510	)		(1,724,458	)
Other, net		611,092			(2,081,655	)

Net cash provided by operating activities	$	55,094,708		$	45,492,890

Cash flow from investing activities:
Purchases of fixed maturities		(175,182,921	)		(183,944,819	)
Purchases of common stock		(7,736,877	)		(3,877,663	)
Proceeds from sale (Purchases) of preferred stock		997,440			(4,405,720	)
Proceeds from sale of fixed maturities		129,198,373			71,504,766
Proceeds from sale of common stock		276,157			1,771,717
Decrease (increase) in short-term investments		12,007,343			10,944,370
Purchase of fixed assets		(3,773,100	)		(2,093,224	)

Net cash used in investing activities	$	(44,213,585	)	$	(110,100,573	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. (unaudited)

Continued on page 5

- 4 -

Continued from page 4

American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow (Continued)
(unaudited)


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2007		2006
	(unaudited)
Cash flow from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	$	1,370,907	$	54,123,029


Net cash provided by financing activities		1,370,907		54,123,029


Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		12,252,030		(10,484,654	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		11,293,296		23,289,927

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	23,545,326	$	12,805,273


Supplemental disclosure of cash flow:
Income taxes paid	$	—	$	2,841,845

Interest paid	$	2,358,831	$	2,422,137


Non-cash activity (1)
Fixed asset additions	$	1,409,340	$	—

Deferred rent	$	1,409,340	$	—


(1)		Represents tenant build out allowance and future reduction in rent over the term of the lease.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. (unaudited)

- 5 -

American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(unaudited)


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Net earnings	$	7,046,141		$	5,387,621		$	21,410,017		$	14,115,752
Other comprehensive income before income taxes:

Unrealized gains on securities available for sale, net of minority interest of $64,385 and $339,507 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $(30,123) and $(67,028) for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively		5,084,171			10,986,257			99,953			(73,173,007

Unrealized losses on hedging transactions		(109,932	)		(168,344	)		(206,378	)		(63,961	)

Reclassification adjustment for realized losses (gains) and included in net earnings		75,819			(39,506	)		83,972			(399,321	)


Total other comprehensive loss before taxes		5,050,058			10,778,407			(22,453	)		2,709,725

Income tax expense (benefit) related to items of other comprehensive income, net of minority interest of $(38,380)and $132,821 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 respectively, and $(63,402) and $(6,400) for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively		(732,167	)		2,129,781			(312,680	)		389,304


Other comprehensive income net of income taxes		4,317,891			8,648,626			290,227			2,320,421


Total comprehensive income	$	11,364,032		$	14,036,247		$	21,700,244		$	16,436,173

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. (unaudited)

- 6 -

American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2007

(unaudited)

Note 1 — Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. (“American Safety Insurance”) and its subsidiaries and American Safety Risk Retention Group, Inc. (“American Safety RRG”), a non-subsidiary risk retention group affiliate (collectively, the “Company”), are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates, based on the best information available, in recording transactions resulting from business operations. The balance sheet amounts that involve a greater extent of accounting estimates and/or actuarial determinations subject to future changes are the Company’s invested assets, deferred income taxes, and the liabilities for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses. As additional information becomes available (or actual amounts are determinable), the recorded estimates may be revised and reflected in operating results. While management believes that these estimates are adequate, such estimates may change in the future.

The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 may not be indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in the audited consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of American Safety Insurance, each of its subsidiaries and American Safety RRG. All significant intercompany balances have been eliminated.

- 7 -

Note 2 — Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Number 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities. This statement allows companies to elect to carry the vast majority of financial assets and liabilities at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded into earnings. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company has chosen not to early adopt this pronouncement.

Note 3 — Nature of Operations

We are a specialty insurance and reinsurance company that provides customized insurance and reinsurance products and solutions to small and medium-sized business in industries that we believe are underserved by the standard market. For over twenty years we have developed specialized insurance coverages and alternative risk transfer products not generally available to our customers in the standard insurance market because of the unique characteristics of the risks involved and the associated needs of the insureds. We specialize in underwriting these products for insureds with environmental risks, construction risks and other specialty risks, as well as in developing programs for other specialty classes of risks and providing reinsurance. See Part II — Other Information, Item 1A for risks facing the Company.

- 8 -

Note 4 — Investments

The amortized cost and estimated fair values of the Company’s investments at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were as follows:


			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		unrealized		unrealized		Estimated
	cost		gains		losses		fair value
September 30, 2007:
Securities available for sale:
Fixed maturities:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies	$	102,686,994	$	597,592	$	397,733	$	102,886,853
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions of the States		7,557,968		26,633		259,467		7,325,134
Corporate securities		194,492,329		1,434,916		2,125,715		193,801,530
Combined mortgage & asset backed securities *		233,384,574		582,112		2,649,720		231,316,966


Total fixed maturities:	$	538,121,865	$	2,641,253	$	5,432,635	$	535,330,483


Common stock	$	17,746,427	$	3,575,657	$	508,005	$	20,814,079


Preferred stock	$	6,912,120	$	—	$	319,232	$	6,592,888


Total	$	562,780,412	$	6,216,910	$	6,259,872	$	562,737,450


December 31, 2006:
Securities available for sale:
Fixed maturities:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies	$	123,390,583	$	368,236	$	1,378,807	$	122,380,012
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions of the States		7,584,447		42,338		238,041		7,388,744
Corporate securities		131,469,859		814,574		812,477		131,471,956
Combined mortgage & asset backed securities *		230,080,072		731,214		2,020,332		228,790,954

Total fixed maturities:	$	492,524,961	$	1,956,362	$	4,449,657	$	490,031,666


Common stock	$	10,258,638	$	2,491,431	$	347,112	$	12,402,957


Preferred stock	$	7,906,620	$	221,830	$	10,390	$	8,118,060


Total	$	510,690,219	$	4,669,623	$	4,807,159	$	510,552,683


*		Comprised of $184 million in AAA mortgages backed by the U.S. Government

- 9 -

Note 5 — Segment Information

We segregate our business into insurance operations and other, with the insurance operations segment being further classified into four additional segments: excess and surplus lines (E&S), alternative risk transfer (ART), assumed reinsurance (Assumed Re) and runoff. E&S is further classified into six business lines: property, environmental, construction, non-construction, excess and surety. ART is further classified into two business lines: specialty programs and fully funded. Run-off includes lines of business that we no longer write. Prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Within the E&S sub segment, our environmental insurance coverages protect against environmental exposures for contractors in the environmental remediation industry and property owners. Our Property coverage encompasses non-standard, surplus lines commercial property business and commercial multi-peril (CMP) policies. The casualty focus of our CMP products is premises liability. Construction provides commercial casualty insurance coverages, generally for residential and commercial contractors. Non-construction offers general liability and product liability coverages for smaller manufacturers and distributors, non-habitational real estate and certain real property owner, landlord and tenant risks. Excess provides excess and umbrella liability coverages over our own and other carriers’ primary casualty polices, with a focus on construction risks. Surety provides payment and performance bonds primarily to the environmental remediation and construction industries.

In our Assumed Re segment, the Company assumes specialty property and casualty business from affiliated and unaffiliated insurers and reinsurers.

In our ART segment, Specialty Programs facilitate the offering of insurance to homogeneous niche groups of risks. Fully funded provides a mechanism for insureds to post collateral so as to fully self-insure their risks. In addition we offer a partially funded product complementing our fully funded product and allowing our customers to partially self-insure their risks. We are paid a fee for arranging this type of transaction and, in the case of partially funded business, we may assume some underwriting risks.

Our Run-off segment includes lines of business that we have placed in run-off, such as workers’ compensation, excess liability insurance for municipalities and commercial lines.

The Other segment consists of amounts associated with realized gains and losses on investments.

- 10 -

The following table presents key financial data by segment for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006 (in thousands of $ US):


	Insurance																					Other			Total
														Assumed
	E&S													Re		ART				Runoff
							Non-									Specialty
September 30, 2007	Prop		Env.		Const.		Const.		Excess			Surety				Programs		FF
Gross premiums written		1,050		11,391		14,481		899		1,756			1,645		4,188		14,920		—		—		—			50,330
Net premiums written		862		6,195		9,382		730		192			1,633		4,188		8,938		—		—		—			32,120
Net premiums earned		223		9,558		14,339		626		187			1,697		2,373		7,568		—		—		—			36,571
Fee income earned		—		—		—		—		—			—		—		—		411		—		—			411
Losses & loss adjustment expenses		145		5,663		8,595		407		122			594		1,630		3,856		—		—		—			21,012
Acquisition expenses		36		2,503		3,137		48		(95	)		455		734		367		—		—		—			7,185
Underwriting profit		41		1,393		2,607		171		160			648		8		3,347		411		—		—			8,786
Income tax expense (benefit)		—											848										(39	)		809
Net earnings (loss)		—											7,113										(67	)		7,046


	Insurance																						Other			Total
															Assumed
	E&S														Re		ART				Runoff
							Non-										Specialty
September 30, 2006	Prop		Env.		Const.		Const.			Excess			Surety				Programs		FF
Gross premiums written		—		12,404		26,204		733			881			1,132		—		20,241		—		—		—			61,595
Net premiums written		—		9,869		25,325		50			123			1,048		—		5,617		—		—		—			42,032
Net premiums earned		—		9,947		23,151		155			139			720		—		4,460		—		—		—			38,572
Fee income earned		—		—				—			—			—		—		—		450		—		—			450
Losses & loss adjustment expenses		—		3,823		16,952		116			84			253		—		2,298		—		—		—			23,526
Acquisition expenses		—		2,700		4,135		(8	)		(44	)		156		—		99		—		—		—			7,038
Underwriting profit		—		3,424		2,064		47			99			311		—		2,063		450		—		—			8,458
Income tax expense (benefit)		—												118										(225	)		343
Net earnings (loss)		—												5,676										(288	)		5,388

- 11 -

The following table presents key financial data by segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006 (in thousands of $ US):


	Insurance																					Other			Total
														Assumed
	E&S													Re		ART				Runoff
							Non-									Specialty
September 30, 2007	Prop		Env.		Const.		Const.		Excess			Surety				Programs		FF
Gross premiums written		1,283		36,374		47,403		3,758		4,952			4,431		15,699		49,705		—		—		—			163,605
Net premiums written		1,018		26,305		41,896		2,159		608			4,370		15,699		23,372		—		—		—			115,427
Net premiums earned		229		29,108		53,600		1,569		598			3,768		5,538		19,930		—		—		—			114,340
Fee income earned																			1,675		—		—			1,675
Losses & loss adjustment expenses		149		16,972		33,570		1,020		389			1,318		3,822		11,346		—		—		—			68,586
Acquisition expenses		36		7,385		10,388		28		(282	)		990		1,379		1,107		—		—		—			21,031
Underwriting profit		44		4,751		9,642		521		491			1,460		336		7,478		1,675		—		—			26,398
Income tax expense (benefit)		—													2,076								(159	)		1,917
Net earnings (loss)		—													21,659								(249	)		21,410
Assets		—													898,628								315			898,943
Equity		—													219,935								(49	)		219,886


	Insurance																							Other			Total
															Assumed
	E&S														Re		ART				Runoff
							Non-										Specialty
September 30, 2006	Prop		Env.		Const.		Const.			Excess			Surety				Programs		FF
Gross premiums written		—		39,289		72,952		1,280			2,350			3,087		—		56,880		—		—			—			175,838
Net premiums written		—		29,676		68,543		597			505			2,131		—		15,606							—			117,058
Net premiums earned		—		27,306		65,023		179			378			1,503		—		14,138		—		—			—			108,527
Fee income earned		—		—		—		—			—			—		—		—		1,317		—			—			1,317
Losses & loss adjustment expenses		—		13,997		43,975		116			227			529		—		8,150		—		(300	)		—			66,694
Acquisition expenses		—		7,712		12,299		(8	)		(94	)		308		—		244		—		—			—			20,461
Underwriting profit		—		5,597		8,749		71			245			666		—		5,744		1,317		300			—			22,689
Income tax expense		—														724									235			959
Net earnings (loss)		—														14,223									(107	)		14,116
Assets		—														793,243									1,496			794,739
Equity		—														189,469									246			189,715

- 12 -

Our Bermuda corporations conduct business in Bermuda and our U.S. corporations conduct business in the U.S. Significant differences exist in the regulatory environment in each country. Those differences include laws regarding the types of investments, capital requirements, solvency monitoring, pricing, corporate taxation, etc.

The following provides key measurable information about the geographic segments for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006 (in thousands of $ US):


September 30, 2007	United States		Bermuda		Total
Income tax		809		—		809
Net earnings		1,560		5,486		7,046


September 30, 2006	United States			Bermuda		Total
Income tax		343			—		343
Net earnings		(174	)		5,562		5,388

The following table provides key financial data about the geographic segments for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006 (in thousands of $ US):


September 30, 2007	United States		Bermuda		Total
Income tax		1,917		0		1,917
Net earnings		3,683		17,727		21,410
Assets		524,105		374,838		898,943
Equity		72,256		147,630		219,886


September 30, 2006	United States		Bermuda		Total
Income tax		959		—		959
Net earnings		2,577		11,539		14,116
Assets		526,431		268,308		794,739
Equity		62,335		127,380		189,715

- 13 -

Note 6 — Income Taxes

Total income tax expense for the periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was allocated as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Tax expense attributable to:
Income from continuing operations	$	808,906		$	343,151		$	1,916,696		$	958,926
Change in unrealized gains/(losses) on hedging transactions		(37,377	)		(56,897	)		(70,168	)		(21,747	)

Change in unrealized gains/(losses) on securities available for sale		731,164			2,319,499			(305,914	)		404,651


Total	$	1,502,693		$	2,605,753		$	1,540,614		$	1,341,830

United States federal and state income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations consists of the following components:


						Change in Valuation
	Current		Deferred			Allowance			Total
Three months ended:
September 30, 2007	$	634,297	$	96,662		$	77,947		$	808,906
September 30, 2006	$	21,212	$	321,939		$	—		$	343,151

Nine months ended:
September 30, 2007	$	2,010,246	$	(40,717	)	$	(52,833	)	$	1,916,696
September 30, 2006	$	1,471,009	$	(512,083	)	$	—		$	958,926

The state income tax benefit aggregated $979 and $3,286 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $9,408 and $9,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and is included in the current provision.

- 14 -

Income tax expense for the periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 differed from the amounts computed by applying the United States Federal income tax rate of 34% to earnings before Federal income taxes as a result of the following:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Expected income tax expense	$	2,670,712		$	1,948,462		$	7,931,082		$	5,125,391
Foreign earned income not subject to U.S. taxation		(1,865,357	)		(1,891,168	)		(6,027,236	)		(3,923,361	)
Change in Valuation allowance		77,947			—			(52,833	)		—
State taxes and other		(74,396	)		285,857			65,683			(243,104	)


Income Tax Expense	$	808,906		$	343,151		$	1,916,696		$	958,926

The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. In completing its FIN 48 analysis, the Company determined that it did not have any liability for unrecognized tax benefits. The Company does not believe it would be subject to any penalties in any open tax years and, therefore, has not booked any such amounts. The Company would classify interest (if applicable) as interest expense and penalties (if applicable) in other expenses in the Company’s financial statements.

Note 7 — Employee Stock Options

The Company’s stock option plan grants incentive stock options to employees. The majority of the options outstanding under the plan vest evenly over a three year period and have a term of 10 years. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value stock options. The Company’s methodology for valuing options has not changed from December 31, 2006. During the first nine months of 2007, the Company granted 67,500 options compared to 50,500 for the same period of 2006. No options were granted for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 respectively.

The Company started applying the recognition and measurement principles of SFAS No. 123R, Share Based Payment, in the first quarter of 2006. For the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, stock based compensation expense was $126,006 and $154,469, respectively. Stock based compensation expense was $394,779 and $453,710 for the first nine months of 2007 and 2006, respectively, and is reflected in Net earnings under Payroll and related expenses.

- 15 -

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

We are a specialty insurance and reinsurance company that provides customized insurance and reinsurance products and solutions to small and medium-sized businesses in industries that we believe are underserved by the standard insurance market. For over twenty years, we have developed specialized insurance coverages and alternative risk transfer products not generally available to our customers in the standard insurance market because of the unique characteristics of the risks involved and the associated needs of the insureds. We specialize in underwriting these products for insureds with environmental risks and construction risks as well as in developing programs for other specialty classes of risks and providing reinsurance.

We segregate our business into insurance operations and other, with the insurance operations segment further classified into four additional segments: excess and surplus lines, alternative risk transfer, assumed reinsurance and runoff. The excess and surplus lines segment is then further classified into six business lines: property, environmental, construction, surety, non-construction and excess. The alternative risk transfer segment is further classified into three business lines: specialty programs and fully funded and partially funded. Assumed reinsurance, which began operations in the first quarter of 2007, consists of specialty property and casualty business assumed from unaffiliated insurers and reinsurers. Our run-off segment includes lines of business that we have placed in run-off, such as workers’ compensation, excess liability insurance for municipalities and commercial lines. Our other segment consists of amounts associated with realized gains and losses on investments.

The following information is presented on the basis of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this report. All amounts and percentages are rounded.

- 16 -

The following table sets forth the Company’s consolidated revenues:


	Three Months Ended						%			Nine Months Ended					%
	September 30,						Variance			September 30,					Variance
	2007			2006						2007			2006

Net premiums written:
Excess and Surplus Lines
Environmental	$	6,195		$	9,869			(37.2	)%	$	26,305		$	29,676		(11.4	)%
Construction		9,382			25,325			(63.0	)		41,896			68,543		(38.9	)
Non-construction		730			50			1,359.2			2,159			597		261.6
Property		862			—			—			1,018			—		—
Excess		192			123			55.3			608			505		20.4
Surety		1,633			1,048			55.7			4,370			2,131		105.1

Total		18,994			36,415			(47.8	)		76,356			101,452		(24.8	)
Alternative Risk Transfer
Specialty Programs		8,938			5,617			51.5			23,372			15,606		49.8

Assumed Reinsurance		4,188			—			—			15,699			—		—

Total net premiums written	$	32,120		$	42,032			24.1	%	$	115,427		$	117,058		1.4	%


Net premiums earned:
Excess and Surplus Lines
Environmental	$	9,558		$	9,947			(3.9	)%	$	29,108		$	27,306		6.6	%
Construction		14,339			23,151			(38.1	)		53,600			65,023		(17.6	)
Non-construction		626			155			303.9			1,569			179		776.5
Property		223			—			—			229			—		—
Excess		187			139						598			378		58.2
Surety		1,697			720			135.7			3,768			1,503		150.7

Total	$	26,630		$	34,112			(21.9	)	$	88,872		$	94,389		(5.8	)
Alternative Risk Transfer
Specialty Programs		7,568			4,460			69.7			19,930			14,138		41.0

Assumed Reinsurance		2,373			—			—			5,538			—		—

Total net premiums earned	$	36,571		$	38,572			(5.2	)%	$	114,340		$	108,527		5.4	%
Net investment income		7,791			6,002			29.8			22,497			15,271		47.3
Net realized gains (losses)		(81	)		(9	)		900.0			(89	)		351		(125.4	)
Fee income		411			450			8.7			1,675			1,317		27.2
Other income		18			6			(200.0	)		50			37		35.1

Total Revenues	$	44,711		$	45,021			(.7	%)	$	138,473		$	125,503		10.3	%

- 17 -

The following table sets forth the components of the Company’s insurance operations GAAP combined ratio for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended						Nine months ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Insurance operations:
Loss and loss adjustment expense ratio		57.5	%		61.0	%		60.0	%		61.5	%
Expense ratio		37.8	%		35.7	%		35.1	%		35.6	%

Combined ratio		95.3	%		96.7	%		95.1	%		97.0	%

Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 compared to
Three Months Ended September 30, 2006

Effective July 1, 2007 the Company entered into an excess of loss reinsurance treaty on its casualty line of business increasing third quarter net earnings by approximately $170,000. The treaty provides more flexibility in adding new programs and products, reduces volatility in our results and improves underwriting results as we cede losses. The treaty also impacted net premiums written, net premiums earned, losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred and cash flow from operations. The table below shows the impact on each of these items by line of business.


				(In Millions)
							Losses and
	Net			Net			Loss					Under-
	Premiums			Premiums			Adjustment			Acquisition		writing
	Written			Earned			Expenses			Expenses		Profit
Construction	$	(5.1	)	$	(3.1	)	$	(2.8	)			$	(0.3	)
Environmental		(2.4	)		(0.4	)		(0.7	)				0.3
Non-construction		0.3			0			(0.1	)				0.1
Programs		2.9			0.5			0.2			0.2		0.1


	$	(4.3	)	$	(3.0	)	$	(3.4	)	$	0.2	$	0.2

Net cash flow from operations was negatively impacted by approximately $5 million due to funding requirements of the new treaty.

- 18 -

Net Premiums Earned

Excess and Surplus Lines

Environmental. Net premiums earned decreased 3.9% to $9.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007, compared to $9.9 million for the same period 2006 primarily due to the impact of the reinsurance treaty. The Company has also experienced rate declines in the environmental line in 2007.

Construction. Net premiums earned decreased 38.1% to $14.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007, compared to $23.2 million for the same period in 2006. Prior to the new reinsurance treaty, the Company retained 100% of its construction premium. In the third quarter of 2007, $3.1 million of earned premium was ceded to the treaty. During the quarter, the Company continued to experience a significant decline in its western states book of business due primarily to increased competition, partially offset by geographic diversification outside of western states. The principal reason driving the decline was lower renewal retention rates in the western states as the Company continues to exercise underwriting discipline in a more competitive market. The effects of a slowing housing market translated into lower average premiums per account and a reduction in audit premiums. In addition construction premiums were further impacted by rate declines.

Non-Construction. Net premiums earned increased to $626,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2007, compared to $155,000 for the same period in 2006. This product began production in the second half of 2006. This line offers both primary and excess products to smaller manufacturers, distributors, non-habitational real estate and certain real property owner, landlord and tenant risks.

Property. The Company’s property general liability line, which began production in June 2007, produced $223,000 in net premiums earned for the three months ended September 30, 2007.

Excess. Net premiums earned increased 34.5% to $187,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $139,000 for the same period of 2006. The Company’s excess product offering is focused primarily in the construction and products liability areas. The addition of a new underwriting team in Middletown, New Jersey has allowed the Company to expand its excess liability products to write over other carriers’ primary policies and to offer umbrella liability coverage.

Surety. Net premiums earned increased 135.7% to $1.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $0.7 million for the same period of 2006. The increase in surety premiums is due to the Company continuing to focus its growth efforts in the environmental contractor surety market because of the lack of capacity serving this segment of the market.

- 19 -

Alternative Risk Transfer

Specialty Programs. Net premiums earned increased 69.7% to $7.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $4.5 million for the same period in 2006. Net premiums earned increased primarily due to increased retention levels, thereby allowing the Company the opportunity to increase its earnings potential from underwriting profits.

Fully Funded. Fee income earned on fully funded policies decreased 8.7% to $411,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $450,000 for the same period of 2006. The Company has seen some adverse impact from the overall market softening in its production efforts in this line as declines in traditional insurance pricing provides a cost effective alternative to self-insurance.

Assumed Reinsurance.

Effective January 1, 2007 the Company, through its Bermuda based reinsurance operation, assumes specialty property and casualty business from unaffiliated insurers and reinsurers. For the three months ended September 30, 2007 the Company generated $2.4 million in net premiums earned in this line of business. The Company has entered into small participations on several treaties, covering directors and officers’ liability, professional liability, general liability, property catastrophe and excess auto liability.

Net Investment Income

Net investment income increased 29.8% to $7.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $6.0 million for the same period of 2006. This increase was due to an increase in invested assets and higher investment yields. Average invested assets increased to $580.9 million at September 30, 2007 from $502.1 million at September 30, 2006 due to a secondary offering in June 2006, which raised $53 million, and positive cash flows from operations. The average pre-tax and after-tax investment yields were 5.4% and 4.5% compared to 4.8% and 4.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Net Realized Gains (Losses)

Net realized losses from the sale of investments increased to $81,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2007, compared to $9,000 for the same period of 2006. The Company, from time to time, may sell securities to fund the cash needs of individual operating subsidiaries or in response to market conditions or interest rate fluctuations in accordance with its investment guidelines.

- 20 -

Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses

The 2007 losses and loss adjustment expenses totaled $21.0 million compared to $23.5 million in 2006 due to lower net earned premiums caused by the $3.4 million of premium ceded under the reinsurance treaty. The 2007 loss ratio was 57.5% compared to 61.0% in 2006.

Acquisition Expenses

Policy acquisition expenses are amounts that are paid to producers of premiums. These expenses are offset in part by the ceding commissions we receive from our reinsurers. For our program business, fees typically are earned through ceding commissions and have the effect of lowering our acquisition expenses. Policy acquisition expenses increased to $7.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $7.0 million for the same period of 2006, and, as a percentage of net premiums earned, increased to 19.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2007, compared to 18.2% for the same period of 2006. The increase in acquisition expenses is primarily due to the elimination of ceding commission from the new reinsurance treaty.

Minority Interest Expense

Minority interest expense is associated with the Company’s non-subsidiary affiliate, American Safety RRG. The minority interest expense was $26,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2007, compared to $47,000 for the same period of 2006.

Payroll and Other Expenses

Payroll and other expenses were flat at $7.8 million for the three months ended September 30 in each of 2007 and 2006.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was 10.3% of pre-tax income as compared to 6.0% for the same period of 2006. The higher tax rate is primarily due to increased commissions ceded to the new reinsurance treaty, resulting in a smaller percentage of the Company’s profits being earned in Bermuda.

- 21 -

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 compared to
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006

Net Premiums Earned

Excess and Surplus Lines.

Environmental. Net premiums earned increased 6.6% to $29.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to $27.3 million for the same period of 2006. The accrual of $1.8 million of reinstatement premiums resulting from the settlement of a prior year claim negatively impacted net premiums earned in 2006. Without this 2006 accrual, net premiums earned were essentially flat period to period.

Construction. Net premiums earned decreased 17.6% to $53.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $65.0 million for the same period in 2006. The Company has seen a significant decline in its western states book of business, partially offset by geographic diversification efforts. The principal reason driving the decline was lower renewal retention rates in the western states as the Company continues to exercise underwriting discipline in a more competitive market. The effects of a slowing housing market translated into lower average premiums per account and a reduction in audit premiums also contributed to the decline. This line was further impacted by rate declines. In addition, the Company ceded $3.1 million of earned premium to the new reinsurance treaty. Prior to July 1, 2007, the Company retained 100% of this premium.

Non-Construction. Net premiums earned increased to $1,569,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $179,000 for the same period of 2006. This product began operation in the second half of 2006. This line offers both primary and excess products to smaller manufacturers, distributors, non-habitational real estate and certain owner, landlord and tenant risks.

Property. The Company’s property general liability line, which began production in June 2007, produced $229,000 in net premiums earned for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

Excess. Net premiums earned increased 58.2% to $598,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $378,000 for the same period of 2006. The Company’s excess product offering is focused primarily in the construction and product liability areas. The addition of the underwriting team in New Jersey in 2006 has allowed the Company to expand its excess liability products to write over other carriers’ primary policies and to offer umbrella liability coverage.

Surety. Net premiums earned increased 150.7% to $3.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $1.5 million for the same period of 2006. Effective June 1,

- 22 -

2006 the Company did not renew the quota share reinsurance treaty in its surety line, resulting in an increase in net retentions and, as a result, an increase in net premiums earned. The increase in surety premiums is also due to the Company continuing to focus its growth efforts in the environmental contractor surety market because of the lack of capacity serving this segment of the market.

Alternative Risk Transfer.

Specialty Programs. Net premiums earned increased 41.0% to $20.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $14.1 million for the same period of 2006. Net premiums earned increased due primarily to increased retention levels, thereby allowing the Company the opportunity to increase its earnings potential from underwriting profits.

Fully Funded. Fee income earned on fully funded policies increased 27.2% to $1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $1.3 million for the same period of 2006. The Company has seen some adverse impact from the overall market softening on its production efforts in this line as the decline in traditional insurance pricing provides a cost effective alternative to self-insurance.

Assumed Reinsurance.

Effective January 1, 2007 the Company, through its Bermuda based reinsurance operation, assumes specialty property and casualty business from unaffiliated insurers and reinsurers. For the first nine months of 2007, the Company has entered into small participations on several treaties, including treaties covering directors and officers’ liability, professional liability, general liability, property catastrophe and excess auto liability. This line of business generated $5.5 million in net premiums earned for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

Net Investment Income

Net investment income increased 47.3% to $22.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $15.3 million for the same period of 2006, due to an increase in the Company’s invested assets and higher investment yields. Average invested assets increased to $571.2 million at September 30, 2007 from $461.9 million at September 30, 2006, reflecting $53 million of proceeds from the Company’s secondary equity offering in June 2006 and positive cash flow from operations. The average pre-tax and after-tax investment yields were 5.3% and 4.4%, compared to 4.6% and 3.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

- 23 -

Net Realized Gains (Losses)

The sale of investments generated a net loss of $89,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, compared to net gains of $351,000 for the same period of 2006. The Company, from time to time, may sell securities to fund the cash needs of individual operating subsidiaries or in response to market conditions or interest rate fluctuations in accordance with its investment guidelines.

Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses

The Company’s loss and loss adjustment expense ratio decreased to 60.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to 61.5% for the same period of 2006. In 2006, the accrual of $1.8 million of reinstatement premiums resulting from the settlement of a prior year claim negatively impacted year-to-date net premium earned, which in turn negatively impacted the loss ratio. In addition in 2006, the Company experienced adverse loss development of $688,000. This development was primarily related to a prior year New York claim. In 2007, due to the softening market, the Company increased its current year expected loss ratio.

Acquisition Expenses

Policy acquisition expenses are amounts that are paid to producers of premiums. These expenses are affected in part by the ceding commissions we receive from our reinsurers. For our program business, fees typically are earned through ceding commissions and have the affect of lowering acquisition expenses. Policy acquisition expenses increased to $21.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, compared to $20.5 million for the same period of 2006, and, as a percentage of net premiums earned, decreased to 18.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to 18.9% for the same period in 2006. The decrease in the acquisition expense ratio is due to increased retentions, the change in mix of business in the Company’s premium writings and lowered net premiums earned in 2006 as the Company accrued $1.8 million in reinstatement premiums.

- 24 -

Minority Interest Expense

Minority interest expense is associated with the Company’s non-subsidiary affiliate, American Safety RRG. The minority interest expense was $150,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, compared to ($464,000) for the same period of 2006. In 2006, American Safety RRG incurred a $764,000 loss related to the settlement of a prior year claim.

Payroll and Other Expenses

Payroll and other expenses increased 8.1% to $22.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, compared to $20.9 million for the same period of 2006. The change is due to an increase in head count, which is primarily related to the addition of a claims handling office in California and an underwriting office in New Jersey, normal annual salary increases and increases in rent expense, depreciation expense and costs associated with the relocation of our U.S. subsidiaries.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense for the first nine months of 2007 was $1.9 million or 8.2% of pre-tax income, compared to $959,000 or 6.4% of pre-tax income for the same period of 2006. In 2006, the tax rate was lower due to the settlement of a prior year claim, resulting in a $2.8 million pre-tax charge incurred by the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company meets its cash requirements and finances its growth principally through cash flows generated from operations. The Company is currently operating in a softening market and as a result, has been experiencing a decline in premium rates due to the entrance of new insurance competitors and overall market conditions. The Company’s primary sources of short-term cash flow are premium writings and investment income. Short-term cash requirements relate to claims payments, reinsurance premiums, commissions, salaries, employee benefits and other operating expenses. Due to the uncertainty regarding the timing and amount of settlements of unpaid claims, the Company’s future liquidity requirements may vary; therefore, the Company has structured its investment portfolio maturities to help mitigate the variations in those factors. The Company believes its current cash flows are sufficient for the short-term needs of its business and its invested assets are sufficient for the long-term needs of its insurance business.

Net cash provided from operations was $55.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and $45.5 million for the same period of 2006. This increase primarily was attributable to higher net investment income, which increased to $22.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $15.3 million for the same period of 2006.

- 25 -

Our ability to pay future dividends to shareholders will depend, to a significant degree, on the ability of our subsidiaries to generate earnings from which to pay dividends. The jurisdictions in which we and our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are domiciled place limitations on the amount of dividends or other distributions payable by insurance companies in order to protect the solvency of insurers. Given our expected growth and the capital requirements associated with that growth, we do not anticipate paying dividends on our common shares in the near future.

Income Taxes

We are incorporated under the laws of Bermuda and, under current Bermuda law, do not pay Bermuda taxes based upon income or capital gains. We have received an undertaking from the Minister of Finance in Bermuda pursuant to the provisions of The Exempted Undertakings Tax Protection Act 1966, which exempts us and our shareholders, other than shareholders ordinarily resident in Bermuda, from any Bermuda taxes computed on profits, income or any capital asset, gain or appreciation, or any tax in the nature of estate, duty or inheritance until March 28, 2016. We, exclusive of our United States subsidiaries, do not consider ourselves to be engaged in a trade or business in the United States and accordingly, do not expect to be subject to direct United States income taxation. Our U.S. subsidiaries are subject to taxation in the United States.

Combined Ratio

Our underwriting results are best indicated by our GAAP combined ratio, which is the sum of (a) the ratio of incurred losses and settlement expenses to net premiums earned (loss ratio) and (b) the ratio of policy acquisition costs and other operating expenses to net premiums earned (expense ratio). A combined ratio below 100% indicates that a company has an underwriting profit, and a combined ratio above 100% indicates an insurer has an underwriting loss. Our reported expense ratio excludes certain holding company expenses such as interest expense as well as real estate and fee income.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this report are forward-looking statements within the meaning of U.S. securities laws. You can generally identify these statements by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “target,” “plan,” “project” or “continue” or the negatives or other variations or similar terminology. Forward-looking statements relate to, among other things:

•

conditions in the insurance markets served by the Company as well as general economic conditions and other factors, including prevailing interest rate levels and stock market

- 26 -

			performance, which may affect our ability to sell our insurance products and services, the market value of our investments and the lapse rate and profitability of our policies;

	•		the availability and terms of future strategic acquisitions;

	•		changes in the federal income tax laws and regulations which may affect the relative tax advantages of some of our products;

	•		legal or regulatory changes or actions, including those relating to the underwriting of insurance products, regulation of the sale, underwriting and pricing of insurance products and services;

	•		our ability to maintain or improve our current rating by A.M. Best Company (“A.M. Best”);

	•		expectations regarding the adequacy of our reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses;

	•		our ability to leverage our relationships with producers;

	•		our areas of projected growth, growth opportunities and growth strategy;

	•		our ability to expand our information technology capabilities;

	•		the diversification of our insurance risk portfolio; and

	•		our future liquidity requirements.

Actual results may differ materially from the results suggested by the forward-looking statements for a number of reasons. We have made these statements based on our plans and analyses of our company, our business and the insurance industry as a whole. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of the assumptions could over time prove to be inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this report will themselves prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of this information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives will be achieved. We expressly disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statement unless required by law.

- 27 -

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

For an in-depth discussion of the Company’s market risks, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk in Item 7A of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and “Part II Other Information”, Item 1A-Risk Factors” herein.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Report, concluded that, as of such date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective to ensure that material information relating to the Company (including consolidated subsidiaries) would be made known to them.

Changes in Internal Control

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation described above that occurred during the Company’s last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

- 28 -

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

We, through our subsidiaries, are routinely party to pending or threatened litigation or arbitration disputes in the normal course of or related to our business. Based upon information presently available, in view of legal and other defenses available to our subsidiaries, management does not believe that any pending or threatened litigation or arbitration disputes will have any material adverse effect on our financial condition or operating results.

Griggs et al. v. American Safety Reinsurance, Ltd. et al., Case No. 2003-31509, Circuit Court, Seventh Judicial District, Volusia County, Florida. Seven plaintiffs filed suit against us and three of our subsidiaries seeking to recover a $2.1 million loan made by the plaintiffs in 1986 to Ponce Marina, Inc., the former owner of the Harbour Village property. The plaintiffs claimed that we were responsible for the repayment of the loan, with interest. The plaintiffs propounded four theories of liability and the court granted judgment for us on three of the theories. However, the court entered judgment on August 10, 2005 against us for approximately $3.4 million, which includes interest, on the remaining theory. The court held that we, as a condition of our loan, required Ponce Marina, Inc. to demand that the plaintiffs enter into an agreement with Ponce Marina, Inc., to the detriment of their loans and to our benefit, and thus, we had entered into a quasi-contract with the plaintiffs to repay their loan with interest.

We filed an appeal in December 2005, and oral argument on our appeal was heard on December 5, 2006. On May 18, 2007, the District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida, Fifth District, reversed the judgment against the Company. The plaintiffs filed a motion for rehearing with the Appeals Court, which motion was denied by the Court on July 6, 2007. The Plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend their complaint with the trial court. On September 14, 2007, the trial court issued an order vacating its judgment against the Company, dismissing the Plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice and denying the motion to amend. On October 9, 2007, the Plaintiffs appealed the denial of their motion to amend. That appeal is pending with the Florida Appellate Court.

- 29 -

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our business is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties are described in detail in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, that is on file with the SEC. Some of these risks are highlighted below.

A downgrade in our A.M. Best rating or increased capital requirements could impair our ability to sell insurance policies.

Some policyholders are required to obtain insurance coverage from insurance companies that have an “A-” (Excellent) rating or higher from A.M. Best. Additionally, many producers are prohibited by their internal guidelines from representing insurance companies that are rated below “A-” (Excellent) by A.M. Best. Because A.M. Best continually monitors companies with regard to their ratings, our ratings could change at any time, and any downgrade of our current rating could impair our ability to sell insurance policies and, ultimately, our financial condition and operating results.

The exclusions and limitations in our policies may not be enforceable.

We draft the terms and conditions of our excess and surplus lines policies to manage our exposure to expanding theories of legal liability in business lines such as asbestos abatement, construction defect, environmental and professional liability. Many of the policies we issue include exclusions or other conditions that define and limit coverage. In addition, many of our policies limit the period during which a policyholder may bring a claim under the policy, which period in many cases is shorter than the statutory period under which these claims can be brought against our policyholders. While these exclusions and limitations help us assess and control our loss exposure, it is possible that a court or regulatory authority could nullify or void an exclusion or limitation, or legislation could be enacted modifying or barring the use of these exclusions and limitations, particularly with respect to evolving business lines such as construction defect. This could result in higher than anticipated losses and loss adjustment expenses by extending coverage beyond our underwriting intent or increasing the number or size of claims, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. In some instances, these changes may not become apparent until some time after we have issued the insurance policies that are affected by the changes. As a result, the full extent of liability under our insurance contracts may not be known for many years after a policy is issued.

The risks we underwrite are concentrated in relatively few industries and/or with limited geographic dispersion.

We focus much of our underwriting on specialty risks in the construction and environmental remediation industries and our construction business has been concentrated in the western states. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, approximately 51% of our gross premiums written were in these two industries and we have experienced a significant decline in our western states construction business. Accordingly, our operating results could be more

- 30 -

exposed than our more diversified competitors to unfavorable changes in business, economic or regulatory conditions, changes in federal, state or local environmental standards and establishment of legal precedents affecting these industries or geographic locations. Similarly, a significant incident impacting one of these industries or the western states that has the effect of increasing claims generally (or their settlement value) could negatively impact our financial condition and operating results.

Policy pricing in our industry is cyclical, and our financial results are impacted by that cyclicality.

The property and casualty insurance industry has historically been a cyclical industry consisting of both “soft market” periods and “hard market” periods. During soft market periods, insurers tend to be more aggressive in writing policies and competitive in the pricing of those policies. Hard market periods are characterized by shortages of underwriting capacity and high premium rates. Beginning in 2000, we believe our industry experienced a hardening market, reflected by increasing rates and more restrictive coverage terms. These trends appeared to have started slowing in 2004. We believe the industry is now in a soft market where pricing generally has become more competitive and policy terms and conditions have become less restrictive. Therefore, we may not be able to achieve our growth and profitability goals. Because this cyclicality is due in large part to the economy, the particular needs of insureds and the actions of our competitors, we cannot predict the timing or duration of changes in the insurance market cycle.

We may respond to market trends by expanding or contracting our underwriting activities, which may cause our financial results to be volatile.

Although we perform substantial due diligence and risk analysis before entering into a new business line or insuring a new type of risk, and carefully assess the impact of exiting a business line, changing business lines inherently has more risk than remaining in the same business lines over a period of time. Because we actively seek to expand or contract our capacity in the markets we serve in response to factors such as loss experience and premium production, our operating results may experience material fluctuations.

Our actual incurred losses may be greater than reserves for our losses and loss adjustment expenses.

Insurance companies are required to maintain reserves to cover their estimated liability for losses and loss adjustment expenses with respect to both reported and incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) claims. Reserves are estimates at a given time involving actuarial and statistical projections of what we expect to be the cost of the ultimate resolution and administration of claims. These estimates are based on facts and circumstances then known, predictions of future events, estimates of future trends, projected claims frequency and severity, potential judicial expansion of liability precedents, legislative activity and other factors, such as inflation. A full actuarial analysis of our reserves is performed on an annual basis, which may

- 31 -

include reserve studies, rate studies and regulatory opinions.

Notwithstanding these efforts, the establishment of appropriate reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses reserves is an inherently uncertain process, particularly in the environmental remediation industry, construction industry and some of the other industries for which we write policies where extensive historical data may not exist or where the risks insured are long-tail in nature in that claims that have occurred may not be reported to us for long periods of time. For instance, there is little empirical data for residential construction defect claims and hence, traditional actuarial analysis may be inapplicable or less reliable, which may cause our reserve estimates for this business line to be more volatile. Due to these uncertainties, our ultimate losses could materially exceed our reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses, especially in business lines where we have increased our risk retention. For example, during the last two years, we increased our loss reserves as a result of litigation matters specifically related to our construction lines policies and policies written on runoff lines, which lowered our net earnings and shareholders’ equity during these periods.

To the extent that reserves for losses or loss adjustment expenses are estimated in the future to be inadequate, we would have to increase our reserves and incur charges to earnings in the periods in which the reserves are increased. In addition, increases in reserves may also cause additional reinsurance premiums to be payable to our reinsurers in the form of reinstatement premiums. These increases in reserves and reinstatement premiums would adversely impact our financial condition and operating results. To the extent any individual case reserves prove to be inadequate, our financial condition and operating results would be adversely affected. For more information on our losses and loss adjustment expenses, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

We are subject to risks related to litigation.

From time to time, we are subject to lawsuits and other claims arising out of our business operations. We have responded to the lawsuits we face and, although the outcome of these lawsuits cannot be predicted, we believe that there are meritorious defenses and intend to vigorously contest these claims. Adverse judgments in one or more of these lawsuits could require us to change aspects of our operations in addition to paying significant damage amounts. In addition, the expenses related to these lawsuits may be significant. Lawsuits can have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results, particularly where we have not established an accrual, or a sufficient accrual, for damages or expenses.

We routinely evaluate opportunities to expand our business through acquisitions of other companies or business lines. There are many risks associated with acquisitions that we may be unable to control.

We evaluate potential acquisition opportunities as a means to grow our business. There are a number of risks attendant to any acquisition. These risks include, among others, the

- 32 -

difficulty in integrating the operations and personnel of an acquired company; potential disruption of our ongoing business; inability to successfully integrate acquired systems and insurance programs into our operations; maintenance of uniform standards, controls and procedures; possible impairment of relationships with employees and insureds of an acquired business as a result of changes in management; and that the acquired business may not produce the level of expected profitability. As a result, the impact of any acquisition on our future performance may not be consistent with original expectations, and may impair our business, financial condition and operating results.

Changes in the value of our investment portfolio may have a material impact on our operating results.

We derive a significant portion of our net income from our invested assets. As a result, our operating results depend in part on the performance of our investment portfolio. As of, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the fair value of our investment portfolio was $591.3 million and our income derived from these assets was $22.5 million, or 96.4% of our pre-tax earnings. Our investment portfolio is subject to various risks, including:

	•		credit risk, which is the risk that our invested assets will decrease in value due to unfavorable changes in the financial prospects or a downgrade in the credit rating of an entity in which we have invested;

	•		interest rate risk, which is the risk that our invested assets may decrease in value due to changes in interest rates;

	•		equity price risk, which is the risk that we will incur economic loss due to a decline in equity prices; and

	•		duration risk, which is the risk that our invested assets may not adequately match the duration of our insurance liabilities.

Our investment portfolio is comprised mostly of fixed-income securities. We do not hedge our investments against interest rate risk and, accordingly, changes in interest rates may result in fluctuations in the value of these investments.

Our investment portfolio is managed by a professional investment management firm in accordance with detailed investment guidelines established by our Board of Directors that stress diversification of risks, conservation of principal and liquidity. If our investment portfolio is not appropriately matched with our insurance and reinsurance liabilities, we may be forced to liquidate investments prior to their maturity at a significant loss in order to cover these liabilities. This might occur, for instance, in the event of a large or unexpected claim or series of claims. Large investment losses could significantly decrease our asset base, thereby affecting our ability to underwrite new business.

- 33 -

Our Bermuda operations may be subject to U.S. tax.

American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. (“American Safety Insurance”), its reinsurance subsidiary, American Safety Reinsurance (“American Safety Re”), and its segregated account captive, American Safety Assurance Ltd. (“American Safety Assurance”), are organized in Bermuda. American Safety Insurance, American Safety Re and American Safety Assurance are operated in a manner such that none should be subject to U.S. tax (other than U.S. excise tax on insurance and reinsurance premium income attributable to insuring or reinsuring U.S. risks and U.S. withholding tax on some types of U.S. source investment income) because none of these companies should be treated as engaged in a trade or business within the U.S. (and, in the case of American Safety Re and American Safety Assurance, to be doing business through a permanent establishment within the U.S.). However, because there is considerable uncertainty as to the activities that constitute being engaged in a trade or business within the U.S. (and what constitutes a permanent establishment under the income tax treaty between the U.S. and Bermuda (the “Bermuda Treaty”) as well as the entitlement of American Safety Re and American Safety Assurance to treaty benefits), there can be no assurances that the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) will not contend successfully that American Safety Insurance, American Safety Re and/or American Safety Assurance is engaged in a trade or business in the U.S. (or that American Safety Re or American Safety Assurance is carrying on business through a permanent establishment in the U.S.). If any of American Safety Insurance, American Safety Re or American Safety Assurance were considered to be engaged in a trade or business in the U.S., it could be subject to U.S. corporate income taxes and additional branch profits taxes on the portion of its earnings effectively connected to such U.S. business, in which case its operating results could be materially adversely affected.

U.S. persons who hold our common shares may be subject to U.S. federal income taxation at ordinary income rates on their proportionate share of our “related party insurance income” (“RPII”).

If the RPII of American Safety Re or American Safety Assurance were to equal or exceed 20% of its gross insurance income in any taxable year and direct or indirect insureds (and persons related to those insureds) own directly or indirectly through entities 20% or more of the voting power or value of American Safety Re or American Safety Assurance, then a U.S. person who owns any of our common shares (directly or indirectly through foreign entities) on the last day of the taxable year would be required to include in its income for U.S. federal income tax purposes that person’s pro rata share of that company’s RPII for the entire taxable year, determined as if that RPII were distributed proportionately only to U.S. persons at that date regardless of whether that income is distributed. In addition, any RPII that is includible in the income of a U.S. tax-exempt organization may be treated as unrelated business taxable income. Neither American Safety Re nor American Safety Assurance expects gross RPII to equal or exceed 20% of its gross income for 2006 or subsequent years, and neither expects its direct or indirect insureds (including related persons) to

- 34 -

directly or indirectly hold 20% or more of its voting power or value, but we cannot be certain that this will be the case because some of the factors which determine the extent of RPII may be beyond our control. If these thresholds are met or exceeded, and if you are an affected U.S. person, your investment could be materially adversely affected. The RPII provisions, however, have never been interpreted by the courts or the U.S. Treasury Department (the “Treasury Department”) in final regulations, and regulations interpreting the RPII provisions of the Code exist only in proposed form. It is not certain whether these regulations will be adopted in their proposed form or what changes or clarifications might ultimately be made thereto or whether any of those changes, as well as any interpretation or application of RPII by the IRS, the courts or otherwise, might have retroactive effect. The Treasury Department has authority to impose, among other things, additional reporting requirements with respect to RPII. Accordingly, the meaning of the RPII provisions and the application thereof to us is uncertain.

U.S. persons who hold our common shares will be subject to adverse tax consequences if American Safety Insurance is considered to be a Passive Foreign Investment Company (a “PFIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

If American Safety Insurance is considered a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. person who owns our common shares will be subject to adverse tax consequences, including subjecting the investor to a greater tax liability than might otherwise apply and subjecting the investor to tax on amounts in advance of when tax would otherwise be imposed, in which case your investment could be materially adversely affected. In addition, if American Safety Insurance were considered a PFIC, upon the death of any U.S. individual owning our common shares, that individual’s heirs or estate would not be entitled to a “step-up” in the basis of the shares which might otherwise be available under U.S. federal income tax laws. American Safety Insurance does not believe that it is, and does not expect to become, a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. No assurance can be given, however, that American Safety Insurance will not be deemed a PFIC by the IRS. If American Safety Insurance were considered a PFIC, it could have material adverse tax consequences for an investor that is subject to U.S. federal income taxation. There are currently no regulations regarding the application of the PFIC provisions to an insurance company. New regulations or pronouncements interpreting or clarifying these rules may be forthcoming. We cannot predict what impact, if any, that guidance would have on an investor that is subject to U.S. federal income taxation.

American Safety Insurance, American Safety Re and American Safety Assurance may become subject to Bermuda taxes in the future.

Bermuda currently imposes no income tax on corporations. American Safety Insurance, American Safety Re and American Safety Assurance have received an assurance from the Bermuda Minister of Finance, under The Exempted Undertakings Tax Protection Act 1966 of Bermuda, as amended (the “Tax Protection Act”), that if any legislation is enacted in Bermuda that would impose tax computed on profits or income, or computed on any capital asset, gain or appreciation, or any tax in the nature of estate duty or inheritance tax, then the imposition of that

- 35 -

tax will not be applicable to American Safety Insurance, American Safety Re or American Safety Assurance until March 28, 2016. No assurance can be given that American Safety Insurance, American Safety Re or American Safety Assurance will not be subject to any Bermuda tax after that date.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:


Exhibit No.		Description

11		Computation of Earnings Per Share

31.1		Certification Pursuant to § 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certification Pursuant to § 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2		Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

- 36 -

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 8^th day of November 2007.


		American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd.

		By:		/s/ Stephen R. Crim

				Stephen R. Crim
				President and Chief Executive Officer

		By:		/s/ William C. Tepe

				William C. Tepe
				Chief Financial Officer
				(Principal Financial Officer)

- 37 -

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents