10-q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-16533
ProAssurance Corporation
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
63-1261433 |
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
100 Brookwood Place, Birmingham, AL
|
|
35209 |
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(205) 877-4400
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
(Former Name, Former Address, and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of October 24, 2008 there were 33,505,234 shares of the registrants common stock
outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Any statements in this Form 10Q that are not historical facts are specifically identified as
forward-looking statements. These statements are based upon our estimates and anticipation of
future events and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to
vary materially from the expected results described in the forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are identified by words such as, but not limited to, anticipate,
believe, estimate, expect, hope, hopeful, intend, may, optimistic, preliminary,
potential, project, should, will and other analogous expressions. There are numerous
factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking
statements. Thus, sentences and phrases that we use to convey our view of future events and trends
are expressly designated as forward-looking statements as are sections of this Form 10Q that are
identified as giving our outlook on future business.
Forward-looking statements relating to our business include among other things: statements
concerning liquidity and capital requirements, return on equity, financial ratios, net income,
premiums, losses and loss reserves, premium rates and retention of current business, competition
and market conditions, the expansion of product lines, the development or acquisition of business
in new geographical areas, the availability of acceptable reinsurance, actions by regulators and
rating agencies, court actions, legislative actions, payment or performance of obligations under
indebtedness, payment of dividends, and other matters.
These forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks, assumptions and
uncertainties, including, among other things, the following factors that could affect the actual
outcome of future events:
|
|
|
general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market area, that are
different than anticipated; |
|
|
|
|
regulatory, legislative and judicial actions or decisions that affect our
business plans or operations; |
|
|
|
|
inflation, particularly in loss costs trends; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the interest rate environment; |
|
|
|
|
the effect that the 2008 Emergency Economic Stabilization Act may have on the
U.S. economy and our business; |
|
|
|
|
performance of financial markets affecting the fair value of our investments or
making it difficult to determine the value of our investments; |
|
|
|
|
changes in laws or government regulations affecting medical professional
liability insurance or the financial community; |
|
|
|
|
changes to our ratings assigned by rating agencies; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of changes in the health care delivery system; |
|
|
|
|
uncertainties inherent in the estimate of loss and loss adjustment expense
reserves and reinsurance, and changes in the availability, cost, quality, or
collectibility of insurance/reinsurance; |
|
|
|
|
the results of litigation, including pre-or-post-trial motions, trials and/or
appeals we undertake; |
|
|
|
|
bad faith litigation which may arise from our handling of any particular claim,
including failure to settle; |
|
|
|
|
changes in competition among insurance providers and related pricing weaknesses
in our markets; |
|
|
|
|
loss of independent agents; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to purchase reinsurance and collect payments from our reinsurers; |
|
|
|
|
increases in guaranty fund assessments; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to achieve continued growth through expansion into other states or
through acquisitions or business combinations; |
|
|
|
|
the expected benefits from acquisitions may not be achieved or may be delayed
longer than expected due to, among other reasons, business disruption, loss of
customers and employees, increased operating costs or inability to achieve cost
savings, and assumption of greater than expected liabilities; |
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting policies and practices that may be adopted by our
regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or the Securities
and Exchange Commission; |
2
|
|
|
changes in our organization, compensation and benefit plans; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to retain and recruit senior management; and |
|
|
|
|
our proposed transaction with PICA may not be approved by
PICAs mutual policyholders or regulators. |
Our results may differ materially from those we expect and discuss in any forward-looking
statements. The principal risk factors that may cause these differences are described in Item 1A,
Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10K and other documents we file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, such as our current reports on Form 8-K, and our regular reports on Forms 10-Q
and 10-K.
We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak
only as of the date made, and advise readers that the factors listed above could affect our
financial performance and could cause actual results for future periods to differ materially from
any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any current statements.
Except as required by law or regulations, we do not undertake and specifically decline any
obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions that may be made to any forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the
occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
3
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
December 31 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
(In thousands, except share data) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale, at fair value |
|
$ |
3,041,171 |
|
|
$ |
3,236,739 |
|
Equity securities, available for sale, at fair value |
|
|
8,538 |
|
|
|
15,451 |
|
Equity securities, trading, at fair value |
|
|
15,160 |
|
|
|
14,173 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
298,707 |
|
|
|
229,817 |
|
Business owned life insurance |
|
|
62,990 |
|
|
|
61,509 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
46,453 |
|
|
|
26,767 |
|
Other |
|
|
51,008 |
|
|
|
54,939 |
|
|
|
|
Total Investments |
|
|
3,524,027 |
|
|
|
3,639,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
4,564 |
|
|
|
30,274 |
|
Premiums receivable |
|
|
90,938 |
|
|
|
98,693 |
|
Receivable from reinsurers on paid losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
17,804 |
|
|
|
39,567 |
|
Receivable from reinsurers on unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
279,427 |
|
|
|
327,111 |
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums |
|
|
13,255 |
|
|
|
14,835 |
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
20,954 |
|
|
|
22,120 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
135,447 |
|
|
|
103,105 |
|
Real estate, net |
|
|
23,725 |
|
|
|
24,004 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
72,213 |
|
|
|
72,213 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
158,008 |
|
|
|
69,491 |
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
4,340,362 |
|
|
$ |
4,440,808 |
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy liabilities and accruals: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
$ |
2,481,404 |
|
|
$ |
2,559,707 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
210,188 |
|
|
|
218,028 |
|
Reinsurance premiums payable |
|
|
126,079 |
|
|
|
128,582 |
|
|
|
|
Total Policy Liabilities |
|
|
2,817,671 |
|
|
|
2,906,317 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
131,480 |
|
|
|
115,263 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
58,296 |
|
|
|
164,158 |
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
3,007,447 |
|
|
|
3,185,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share
100,000,000 shares authorized, 34,104,006 and 33,570,685 shares issued, respectively |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
517,003 |
|
|
|
505,923 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of deferred
tax expense (benefit) of ($30,054) and $5,334, respectively |
|
|
(55,817 |
) |
|
|
9,902 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
894,599 |
|
|
|
793,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,356,126 |
|
|
|
1,309,327 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 598,772 shares and 1,128,111 shares, respectively |
|
|
(23,211 |
) |
|
|
(54,257 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
1,332,915 |
|
|
|
1,255,070 |
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
4,340,362 |
|
|
$ |
4,440,808 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
4
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Capital (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
Retained |
|
Capital |
(In thousands) |
|
Total |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Earnings |
|
Accounts |
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,255,070 |
|
|
$ |
9,902 |
|
|
$ |
793,166 |
|
|
$ |
452,002 |
|
Net income |
|
|
101,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investments,
after tax, net of reclassification adjustments |
|
|
(65,719 |
) |
|
|
(65,719 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(80,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80,335 |
) |
Common shares issued as compensation |
|
|
3,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,687 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
6,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,351 |
|
Net effect of stock options exercised |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
Conversion of convertible debentures |
|
|
112,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,478 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,332,915 |
|
|
$ |
(55,817 |
) |
|
$ |
894,599 |
|
|
$ |
494,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
Retained |
|
Capital |
(In thousands) |
|
Total |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Earnings |
|
Accounts |
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
1,118,547 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
622,310 |
|
|
$ |
496,126 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
2,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
116,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investments,
after tax, net of reclassification adjustments |
|
|
(8,882 |
) |
|
|
(8,882 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(41,265 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,265 |
) |
Common shares issued as compensation |
|
|
3,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,136 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
6,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,377 |
|
Net effect of stock options exercised |
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,198,141 |
|
|
$ |
(8,771 |
) |
|
$ |
741,803 |
|
|
$ |
465,109 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
5
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
126,122 |
|
|
$ |
149,138 |
|
|
$ |
374,393 |
|
|
$ |
440,186 |
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written |
|
$ |
116,409 |
|
|
$ |
139,483 |
|
|
$ |
343,609 |
|
|
$ |
401,809 |
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned |
|
$ |
123,733 |
|
|
$ |
147,130 |
|
|
$ |
382,158 |
|
|
$ |
446,437 |
|
Premiums ceded |
|
|
(10,284 |
) |
|
|
(11,622 |
) |
|
|
(32,364 |
) |
|
|
(41,089 |
) |
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
113,449 |
|
|
|
135,508 |
|
|
|
349,794 |
|
|
|
405,348 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
39,845 |
|
|
|
41,075 |
|
|
|
122,218 |
|
|
|
128,194 |
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(1,967 |
) |
|
|
(589 |
) |
|
|
(3,916 |
) |
|
|
1,241 |
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) |
|
|
(34,236 |
) |
|
|
1,321 |
|
|
|
(41,011 |
) |
|
|
(1,564 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
3,694 |
|
|
|
4,409 |
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
118,088 |
|
|
|
178,617 |
|
|
|
430,779 |
|
|
|
537,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
73,739 |
|
|
|
99,142 |
|
|
|
242,033 |
|
|
|
338,793 |
|
Reinsurance recoveries |
|
|
(8,516 |
) |
|
|
(11,034 |
) |
|
|
(29,457 |
) |
|
|
(52,844 |
) |
|
|
|
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
65,223 |
|
|
|
88,108 |
|
|
|
212,576 |
|
|
|
285,949 |
|
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses |
|
|
24,527 |
|
|
|
27,439 |
|
|
|
75,927 |
|
|
|
79,913 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1,141 |
|
|
|
3,006 |
|
|
|
5,855 |
|
|
|
8,950 |
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
90,891 |
|
|
|
118,553 |
|
|
|
294,358 |
|
|
|
374,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
27,197 |
|
|
|
60,064 |
|
|
|
136,421 |
|
|
|
162,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current expense (benefit) |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
14,997 |
|
|
|
21,907 |
|
|
|
37,200 |
|
Deferred expense (benefit) |
|
|
5,178 |
|
|
|
1,955 |
|
|
|
13,081 |
|
|
|
8,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,950 |
|
|
|
16,952 |
|
|
|
34,988 |
|
|
|
45,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
22,247 |
|
|
$ |
43,112 |
|
|
$ |
101,433 |
|
|
$ |
116,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
3.12 |
|
|
$ |
3.53 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
$ |
2.98 |
|
|
$ |
3.31 |
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
33,496 |
|
|
|
32,779 |
|
|
|
32,519 |
|
|
|
33,082 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
33,866 |
|
|
|
35,604 |
|
|
|
34,561 |
|
|
|
35,949 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
6
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
22,247 |
|
|
$ |
43,112 |
|
|
$ |
101,433 |
|
|
$ |
116,823 |
|
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investments,
after tax, net of reclassification adjustments |
|
|
(40,811 |
) |
|
|
19,411 |
|
|
|
(65,719 |
) |
|
|
(8,882 |
) |
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(18,564 |
) |
|
$ |
62,523 |
|
|
$ |
35,714 |
|
|
$ |
107,941 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
7
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
101,433 |
|
|
$ |
116,823 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,201 |
|
|
|
11,727 |
|
Net realized investment (gains) losses |
|
|
41,011 |
|
|
|
1,564 |
|
Net sales (purchases) of trading portfolio securities |
|
|
(2,876 |
) |
|
|
43,619 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
6,351 |
|
|
|
6,377 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
13,081 |
|
|
|
8,793 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums receivable |
|
|
7,755 |
|
|
|
2,591 |
|
Reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
(78,303 |
) |
|
|
(10,263 |
) |
Unearned premiums |
|
|
(7,840 |
) |
|
|
(5,730 |
) |
Reinsurance related assets and liabilities |
|
|
68,524 |
|
|
|
24,331 |
|
Other |
|
|
(19,326 |
) |
|
|
7,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
142,011 |
|
|
|
207,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale |
|
|
(632,679 |
) |
|
|
(1,076,729 |
) |
Equity securities available for sale |
|
|
(2,650 |
) |
|
|
(657 |
) |
Other investments |
|
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
(552 |
) |
Cash invested in unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(23,601 |
) |
|
|
(10,226 |
) |
Proceeds from sale or maturities of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale |
|
|
691,493 |
|
|
|
970,292 |
|
Equity securities available for sale |
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
3,587 |
|
|
|
8,279 |
|
Net (increase) decrease in short-term investments, excluding unsettled redemptions |
|
|
(117,395 |
) |
|
|
(96,566 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(11,613 |
) |
|
|
9,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities |
|
|
(92,719 |
) |
|
|
(196,019 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(80,335 |
) |
|
|
(41,265 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from options exercised |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
1,673 |
|
Book overdraft |
|
|
5,167 |
|
|
|
12,257 |
|
Other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities |
|
|
(75,002 |
) |
|
|
(27,218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(25,710 |
) |
|
|
(16,026 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
30,274 |
|
|
|
21,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
4,564 |
|
|
$ |
5,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant Non-cash Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities transferred, at fair value, to other investments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34,732 |
|
|
|
|
Unsettled redemption of short-term money market investment |
|
$ |
48,505 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity increase due to conversion of debt
see Notes 7 and 8 |
|
$ |
112,478 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
8
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
September 30, 2008
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of
ProAssurance Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries (ProAssurance). The financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP
for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered
necessary for a fair presentation, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, have been included.
Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of
the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2008. The accompanying Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial
Statements and notes contained in ProAssurances December 31, 2007 report on Form 10-K.
Certain reclassifications have been made in the prior period consolidated financial statements
to conform to the current period presentation.
Accounting Changes
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157). The standard establishes a revised definition of fair value: fair value is
the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS 157 also establishes a
framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS 157 is applicable to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair
value measurements but does not establish new guidance regarding the assets and liabilities
required or allowed to be measured at fair value. The statement is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007, with early adoption permitted. ProAssurance adopted SFAS 157 on
January 1, 2008. ProAssurance did not recognize any cumulative effect related to the adoption of
SFAS 157 and adoption did not have a significant effect on ProAssurances results of operations or
financial condition.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS 159). SFAS 159
permits many financial assets and liabilities to be reported at fair value that are not otherwise
required under GAAP to be measured at fair value. Under SFAS 159 guidance, the election of fair
value treatment is specific to individual assets and liabilities, with changes in fair value
recognized in earnings as they occur. The election of fair value measurement is generally
irrevocable. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with early
adoption permitted. ProAssurance adopted SFAS 159 on January 1, 2008 but did not elect fair value
measurement for any financial assets or liabilities that were not otherwise required to be measured
at fair value.
Recent Accounting Developments
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt
Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement), which
will alter the accounting for ProAssurances Convertible Debentures. FSP APB 14-1 requires issuers
to account for convertible debt securities that allow for either mandatory or optional cash
settlement (including partial cash settlement) by separating the liability and equity components in
a manner that reflects the issuers nonconvertible debt borrowing rate at the time of issuance and
requires recognition of additional (non-cash) interest expense in subsequent periods based on the
nonconvertible rate. Additionally, FSP APB 14-1 requires that when such debt instruments are repaid
or converted any consideration transferred at settlement is to be allocated between the
extinguishment of the liability component and the reacquisition of the equity component. FSP APB
14-1 is effective for ProAssurance on January 1, 2009, and must be applied retrospectively with a
cumulative effect adjustment being made as of the earliest period presented. Early adoption is not
permitted. ProAssurance is currently assessing
9
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
September 30, 2008
1. Basis of Presentation (continued)
the impact that the adoption will have on its financial condition and results of operations, but
expects no impact on ending Total Stockholders Equity after the conversion of the Convertible
Debentures (July 2, 2008).
In December 2007 the FASB issued SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements. SFAS 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin 51 to establish accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. The Statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. ProAssurance will
adopt the Statement on its effective date. Adoption is not expected to have an effect on
ProAssurances results of operations or financial position.
In December 2007 the FASB issued SFAS 141 (Revised 2007), Business Combinations. SFAS 141R
replaces FASB Statement No. 141, Business Combinations, but retains the fundamental requirement in
SFAS 141 that the acquisition method (referred to as the purchase method in SFAS 141) of accounting
be used for all business combinations. SFAS 141R provides new or additional guidance with respect
to business combinations including: defining the acquirer in a transaction, the valuation of assets
and liabilities when noncontrolling interests exist, the treatment of contingent consideration, the
treatment of costs incurred to effect the acquisition, the treatment of reorganization costs, and
the valuation of assets and liabilities when the purchase price is below the net fair value of
assets acquired. SFAS 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition
date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. ProAssurance will adopt the Statement on its
effective date.
2. Fair Value Measurement
Effective January 1, 2008 ProAssurance adopted SFAS 157 which establishes a framework for
measuring fair value and requires specific disclosures regarding assets and liabilities that are
measured at fair value.
As defined in SFAS 157, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. SFAS 157 establishes a three level hierarchy for valuing assets and liabilities
based on how transparent (observable) the inputs are that are used to determine fair value, with
the inputs considered most observable categorized as Level 1 and those that are the least
observable categorized as Level 3. Hierarchy levels are defined by SFAS 157 as follows:
|
Level 1: |
|
quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical assets
and liabilities. For ProAssurance, Level 1 inputs are generally quotes for debt or
equity securities actively traded in exchange or over-the-counter markets. |
|
|
Level 2: |
|
market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity
(observable inputs). For ProAssurance, Level 2 inputs generally include quoted
prices in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar assets/liabilities,
and other observable inputs such as interest rates and yield curves that are
generally available at commonly quoted intervals. |
|
|
Level 3: |
|
the reporting entitys own assumptions about market participant assumptions
developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable
inputs). For ProAssurance, Level 3 inputs are used in situations where little or no
Level 1 or 2 inputs are available or are inappropriate given the particular
circumstances. Level 3 inputs include results from pricing models and discounted
cash flow methodologies as well as adjustments to externally quoted prices that are
based on management judgment or estimation. |
10
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
September 30, 2008
2. Fair Value Measurement (continued)
The following tables present information about ProAssurances assets measured at fair value on
a recurring basis as of September 30, 2008, and indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation
techniques utilized to determine such value. No liabilities are measured at fair value at September
30, 2008. For some assets, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of
the fair value hierarchy. When this is the case, the asset is categorized in the table based on the
lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
ProAssurances assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement
in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the assets being valued.
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
Total |
(In thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and Government-sponsored enterprises |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
227,761 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
227,761 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
864,712 |
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
866,290 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
547,038 |
|
|
|
39,393 |
|
|
|
586,431 |
|
State and municipal bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,360,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,360,689 |
|
Equity securities, available-for-sale |
|
|
8,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
8,538 |
|
Equity securities, trading |
|
|
15,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,160 |
|
Other investments(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,218 |
|
|
|
18,218 |
|
Short-term investments(2) |
|
|
105,224 |
|
|
|
193,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298,707 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
128,572 |
|
|
$ |
3,193,683 |
|
|
$ |
59,539 |
|
|
$ |
3,381,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other investments also include investments of $32.8 million accounted for using the cost method that are not included in the table above. |
|
(2) |
|
Short-term investments are reported at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. |
Level 3 assets in the above table consist primarily of asset-backed securities (as shown in
the table), private placement senior notes (included in Corporate bonds), and a beneficial interest
in asset-backed securities held in a private investment fund (included in Other Investments).
The private placement senior notes are unconditionally guaranteed by large regional banks
rated A or better. The asset-backed securities have a weighted average rating of AA or better, and
are collateralized by a timber trust and a Fannie Mae mortgage backed security. The fair value of
these assets are primarily derived using pricing models that may require multiple market input
parameters as is considered appropriate for the asset being valued.
The
asset-backed securities held in a private investment fund are
primarily backed by manufactured housing, recreational vehicle
receivables, and subprime securities, have an average rating of BB,
and are valued
using a broker dealer quote.
11
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
September 30, 2008
2. Fair Value Measurement (continued)
The following table presents additional information about assets measured at fair value using
Level 3 inputs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
Asset- |
|
|
|
|
|
State and |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
backed |
|
Corporate |
|
Municipal |
|
Equity |
|
Invested |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Securities |
|
Bonds |
|
Bonds |
|
Securities |
|
Assets |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,576 |
|
|
$ |
60,487 |
|
|
$ |
11,142 |
|
|
$ |
740 |
|
|
$ |
19,156 |
|
|
$ |
93,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses), realized and unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings, as a part of net
realized investment gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(349 |
) |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(406 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(390 |
) |
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
(1,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, sales or settlements |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(20,339 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(452 |
) |
|
|
(20,804 |
) |
Transfers in (out) of Level 3, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,142 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,578 |
|
|
$ |
39,393 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
350 |
|
|
$ |
18,218 |
|
|
$ |
59,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of total gains (losses) for
the three months ended
September 30, 2008 included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses)
relating to assets
still held at September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(349 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
33,283 |
|
|
$ |
86,969 |
|
|
$ |
7,183 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,981 |
|
|
$ |
148,416 |
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses), realized and unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings, as a part of net
realized investment gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(429 |
) |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(1,698 |
) |
|
|
(941 |
) |
|
|
(886 |
) |
|
|
(390 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(5,665 |
) |
Purchases, sales or settlements |
|
|
(415 |
) |
|
|
(6,211 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
(1,013 |
) |
|
|
(7,057 |
) |
Transfers in (out) of Level 3, net |
|
|
(29,592 |
) |
|
|
(39,995 |
) |
|
|
(6,139 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75,726 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,578 |
|
|
$ |
39,393 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
350 |
|
|
$ |
18,218 |
|
|
$ |
59,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of total gains (losses)
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 included in earnings
attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets
still held at September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(429 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(429 |
) |
|
|
|
Municipal bonds with an estimated fair value of $11.1 million at June 30, 2008 were
transferred out of Level 3 into Level 2 as of September 30, 2008. Trades of these bonds by market
participants were completed during the third quarter, which provided more transparent inputs for
establishing the fair value of these municipal bonds as of September 30, 2008. Additional transfers
from Level 3 into Level 2 for the year-to-date period ended September 30, 2008 primarily consist of
$40 million of bank loans and $30 million of asset backed bonds that were previously valued using
either a pricing model or a single broker dealer quote, that are now priced using multiple
observable inputs including pricing services that use multiple broker quotes for assessing fair
value.
12
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
September 30, 2008
3. Investments
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of available-for-sale fixed maturities and equity
securities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
$ |
3,118,984 |
|
|
$ |
17,971 |
|
|
$ |
(95,784 |
) |
|
$ |
3,041,171 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
9,015 |
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
(1,838 |
) |
|
|
8,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,127,999 |
|
|
$ |
19,332 |
|
|
$ |
(97,622 |
) |
|
$ |
3,049,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
$ |
3,217,194 |
|
|
$ |
37,246 |
|
|
$ |
(17,701 |
) |
|
$ |
3,236,739 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
13,931 |
|
|
|
2,724 |
|
|
|
(1,204 |
) |
|
|
15,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,231,125 |
|
|
$ |
39,970 |
|
|
$ |
(18,905 |
) |
|
$ |
3,252,190 |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of fixed maturities and equity securities during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 are $376.7 million and $789.5 million, respectively, including proceeds
from sales of adjustable rate, short-duration fixed maturities of approximately $134.4 million and
$474.4 million, respectively. Purchases of adjustable rate, short-duration fixed maturities
approximated $99.3 million and $468.5 million during the same respective periods.
Net realized investment gains (losses) are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Gross realized gains |
|
$ |
2,395 |
|
|
$ |
1,163 |
|
|
$ |
3,484 |
|
|
$ |
2,897 |
|
Gross realized (losses) |
|
|
(5,495 |
) |
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
(6,438 |
) |
|
|
(502 |
) |
Other-than-temporary impairment (losses) |
|
|
(29,862 |
) |
|
|
(428 |
) |
|
|
(36,169 |
) |
|
|
(4,602 |
) |
Trading portfolio net gains (losses) |
|
|
(1,274 |
) |
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
(1,888 |
) |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) |
|
$ |
(34,236 |
) |
|
$ |
1,321 |
|
|
$ |
(41,011 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,564 |
) |
|
|
|
During the third quarter of 2008 we recognized other-than-temporary impairment losses of $29.9
million, which included $788,000 related to asset backed bonds, $19.6 million related to corporate bonds of which $18.9 million were Lehman Brothers bonds,
and $9.5 million related to our equity holdings in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. During the first and
second quarters of 2008 we recognized other-than-temporary impairment losses of $6.3 million, which
included $5.1 million related to asset backed bonds, $513,000 related to corporate bonds and
$353,000 related to a passive investment in a private investment
fund, and $300,000 related to our
equity holdings.
In January 2007, ProAssurance transferred high yield asset backed bonds (previously considered as
available-for-sale securities) having a fair value of approximately $34.7 million to a private
investment fund that is primarily focused on managing such investments. ProAssurance maintains a
direct beneficial interest (the separate interest) in the securities originally contributed to the
fund. ProAssurance recognized an impairment of $4.2 million related to these securities in 2007.
The securities held in the separate interest are included in Other Investments, at fair value
totaling $13.1 million at September 30, 2008 (net of unrealized losses of $7.6 million). Cash flows
of the separate interest, including net
13
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
September 30, 2008
3. Investments (continued)
investment earnings and proceeds from sales or maturities, (totaling $12.9 million to date), are
routinely transferred to a joint interest (the joint interest) of the fund.
The joint interest is accounted for using the equity method and is included in Investment in
Unconsolidated Subsidiaries. In March 2008 ProAssurance contributed an additional $20 million to
the joint interest to take advantage of current dislocations in the credit market. At September 30,
2008 the carrying value of the joint interest is $31.4 million and ProAssurances ownership
interest approximates 21.8%.
4. Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes is different from that which would be obtained by applying the
statutory Federal income tax rate to income before taxes primarily because a portion of
ProAssurances investment income is tax-exempt.
5. Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
Policy acquisition costs, most significantly commissions, premium taxes, and underwriting
salaries, that are primarily and directly related to the production of new and renewal premiums are
capitalized as policy acquisition costs and amortized to expense as the related premium revenues
are earned.
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs are $11.2 million and $34.6 million for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2008. Amortization of deferred acquisition costs was $13.8
million and $40.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007.
6. Reserves for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
The reserve for losses is established based on estimates of individual claims and actuarially
determined estimates of future losses based on ProAssurances past loss experience, available
industry data and projections as to future claims frequency, severity, inflationary trends and
settlement patterns. Estimating reserves is a complex process. Claims may be resolved over an
extended period of time, often five years or more, and may be subject to litigation. Estimating
losses for liability claims requires ProAssurance to make and revise judgments and assessments
regarding multiple uncertainties over an extended period of time. As a result, reserve estimates
may vary significantly from the eventual outcome. The assumptions used in establishing
ProAssurances reserves are regularly reviewed and updated by management as new data becomes
available. Changes to estimates of previously established reserves are included in earnings in the
period in which the estimate is changed.
ProAssurance recognized favorable net loss development of $30.0 million related to previously
established reserves for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and recognized $81.3 million of
favorable net loss development for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The favorable net loss
development reflects reductions in the Companys estimates of claim severity, principally for the
2004 through 2007 accident years but also includes $3.7 million recognized in the second quarter of
2008 related to prior year reinsurance contracts that were commuted during the period.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, ProAssurance recognized favorable net
loss development of $25.0 million and $60.6 million, respectively, to reflect reductions in
estimated claim severity principally for accident years 2003 through 2005, offset by an increase to
the reserves for losses in excess of policy limits.
14
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
September 30, 2008
7. Long-term Debt
Outstanding long-term debt, as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, consists of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
September 30 |
|
December 31 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Convertible Debentures due June 2023 but converted into common stock in July 2008, see below.
Unsecured, principal of $107.6 million bearing a
fixed interest rate of 3.9%, net of unamortized
discount of $1.6 million at December 31, 2007. |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
105,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust Preferred Subordinated Debentures (the 2034
Subordinated Debentures), unsecured, bearing interest
at a floating rate, adjusted quarterly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/30/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2034
|
6.65% |
|
13,403 |
|
|
|
13,403 |
|
May 2034
|
6.65% |
|
32,992 |
|
|
|
32,992 |
|
|
Surplus Notes due May 2034 (the Surplus Notes),
unsecured, principal of $12 million, net of
unamortized discounts of $0.1 million and $0.2
million at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
bearing a fixed interest rate of 7.7%, until May
2009, when the rate converts to a floating rate of
LIBOR plus 3.85%, adjusted quarterly. |
|
11,901 |
|
|
|
11,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
58,296 |
|
|
$ |
164,158 |
|
|
|
|
Convertible Debentures
ProAssurance completed the conversion of all of its outstanding Convertible Debentures
(aggregate principal of $107.6 million) in July 2008. Approximately 2,572,000 shares of
ProAssurance common stock were issued in the transaction (conversion rate was 23.9037 per $1,000
debenture). Of the common shares issued, approximately 2.12 million were reissued Treasury Shares
and 450,000 were newly issued shares. No gain or loss was recorded related to the conversion.
Fair Value
At September 30, 2008, the fair value of the 2034 Subordinated Debentures approximated 83% of
their $46.4 million face value and the fair value of the Surplus Notes approximated 83% of their
$12.0 million face value, based on the present value of underlying cash flows discounted at rates
available at September 30, 2008 for similar debt.
Additional Information
For additional information regarding the terms of ProAssurances outstanding long-term debt
see Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ProAssurances December 31,
2007 Annual Report on Form 10K.
15
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
September 30, 2008
8. Stockholders Equity
At September 30, 2008 ProAssurance had 100 million shares of authorized common stock and 50
million shares of authorized preferred stock. The Board of Directors of ProAssurance Corporation
(the Board) has the authority to determine the provisions for the issuance of preferred shares,
including the number of shares to be issued, the designations, powers, preferences and rights, and
the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such shares. To date, the Board has not approved
the issuance of preferred stock.
ProAssurance repurchased approximately 764,000 common shares, having a total cost of $41.3
million, during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 (including approximately 397,000 shares at
a total cost of $21.3 million during the three months ended September 30, 2007). ProAssurance
repurchased approximately 1.6 million common shares, having a total cost of $80.3 million, during
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 (including approximately 360,000 shares at a cost of $17.3
million during the three months ended September 30, 2008). This fully utilized the $150 million
repurchase authorization approved by the Board of Directors of ProAssurance in April 2007. On
August 5, 2008 the Board of Directors authorized an additional $100 million over the $150 million
authorized in April 2007 for the repurchase of common shares or retirement of outstanding debt. As
of September 30, 2008 all $100.0 million of this repurchase authorization remains available for
use. Treasury shares are reported at cost, and are reflected on the balance sheet as an unallocated
reduction of total equity.
As discussed in Note 7, on July 2, 2008 approximately 2.12 million treasury shares and 450,000
newly issued common shares were used to complete the conversion of ProAssurances Convertible
Debentures. The conversion of the debt increased Stockholders Equity by $112.5 million, consisting
of the carrying amount of the Convertible Debentures (principal of $107.6 million, less the
unamortized portion of related loan discounts and costs of $1.8 million) and a $6.7 million tax
benefit from the reversal of interest-related deferred tax liabilities.
ProAssurance adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes, on January 1, 2007. In accordance with the guidance provided in the statement, the
cumulative effect of adoption, a $2.7 million reduction in tax liabilities, was recorded as an
increase to beginning retained earnings.
ProAssurance provides performance-based stock compensation to employees under the ProAssurance
2004 Equity Incentive Plan and the ProAssurance Corporation Incentive Compensation Stock Plan.
Share-based compensation expense is approximately $1.8 million and $6.4 million with a related tax
benefit of approximately $621,000 and $2.2 million for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2008. Share-based compensation expense is approximately $2.6 million and $6.4 million with a
related tax benefit of approximately $898,000 and $2.2 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007.
ProAssurance granted approximately 133,000 options during the nine months ended September 30,
2008. The estimated fair value of the options averaged $16.49 per option. Fair values were
estimated as of the date of grant, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
Weighted average assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
0.23 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
Expected average term (in years) |
|
|
6 |
|
16
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
September 30, 2008
8. Stockholders Equity (continued)
ProAssurance also granted Performance Share awards to employees in March 2008 under the
ProAssurance 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. The Performance Share awards vest at the end of a three
year service period if specified Performance Measures are attained. The number of Performance
Shares ultimately awarded varies from 75% to 125% of the target award depending upon the degree to
which Performance Measures are attained. The fair value of each Performance Share was estimated as
the market value of ProAssurances common shares on the respective date of grant. The following
table provides information regarding ProAssurances Performance Shares awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
100% vesting date |
|
|
12/31/2010 |
|
Shares awarded (target) |
|
|
73,000 |
|
Grant date fair value |
|
$ |
54.28 |
|
9. Commitments and Contingencies
As a result of the acquisition of NCRIC Corporation in 2005, ProAssurance assumed the risk of
loss for a judgment entered against NCRIC, Inc. (NCRIC) on February 20, 2004 by a District of
Columbia Superior Court in favor of Columbia Hospital for Women Medical Center, Inc. (CHW) in the
amount of $18.2 million (the judgment), which was appealed. In October 2008 the judgment was
affirmed by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. NCRIC has filed a petition for rehearing
with the Court of Appeals. As of September 30, 2008, ProAssurance carries a $22.3 million liability
related to the judgment, including an estimate for post-trial interest and legal costs.
Approximately $19.5 million of the liability was established as a component of the fair value of
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the allocation of the NCRIC purchase price.
ProAssurance is involved in various other legal actions arising primarily from claims against
ProAssurance related to insurance policies and claims handling, including but not limited to claims
asserted by policyholders. Such legal actions have been considered by ProAssurance in establishing
its loss and loss adjustment expense reserves. The outcome of such legal actions is not presently
determinable for a number of reasons. For example, in the event that ProAssurance or its insureds
receive adverse verdicts, post-trial motions may be denied, in whole or in part; any appeals that
may be undertaken may be unsuccessful; ProAssurance may be unsuccessful in legal efforts to limit
the scope of coverage available to its insureds, and ProAssurance may become a party to bad faith
litigation over the amount of the judgment above an insureds policy limits. ProAssurances
management is of the opinion, based on consultation with legal counsel, that the resolution of
these actions will not have a material adverse effect on ProAssurances financial position.
However, the ultimate cost of resolving these legal actions may differ from the reserves
established; the resulting difference could have a material effect on ProAssurances results of
operations for the period in which any such action is resolved.
17
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
September 30, 2008
10. Earnings Per Share
The following table provides detailed information regarding the calculation of basic and
diluted earnings per share for each period presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share calculation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
22,247 |
|
|
$ |
43,112 |
|
|
$ |
101,433 |
|
|
$ |
116,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
33,496 |
|
|
|
32,779 |
|
|
|
32,519 |
|
|
|
33,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
3.12 |
|
|
$ |
3.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share calculation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
22,247 |
|
|
$ |
43,112 |
|
|
$ |
101,433 |
|
|
$ |
116,823 |
|
Effect of assumed conversion of contingently convertible
debt instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
|
Net incomediluted computation |
|
$ |
22,247 |
|
|
$ |
43,854 |
|
|
$ |
102,917 |
|
|
$ |
119,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
33,496 |
|
|
|
32,779 |
|
|
|
32,519 |
|
|
|
33,082 |
|
Assumed exercise of dilutive stock options and issuance of
performance shares |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
Assumed conversion of contingently convertible debt
instruments |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
2,572 |
|
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
2,572 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average equivalent shares |
|
|
33,866 |
|
|
|
35,604 |
|
|
|
34,561 |
|
|
|
35,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
$ |
2.98 |
|
|
$ |
3.31 |
|
|
|
|
In accordance with SFAS 128, Earnings per Share, the diluted weighted average number of shares
outstanding includes an incremental adjustment for the assumed exercise of dilutive stock options.
The adjustment is computed quarterly; the annual incremental adjustment is the average of the
quarterly adjustments. Stock options are considered dilutive stock options if the assumed exercise
of the options, using the treasury stock method as specified by SFAS 128, produces an increased
number of shares. Approximately 354,000 and 207,000 of ProAssurances outstanding options, on
average, were not considered to be dilutive during the nine-months periods ended September 30, 2008
and 2007, respectively.
11. Subsequent Events
As discussed in Note 9, in October 2008 ProAssurance received notice that an $18.2 million
judgment entered against its NCRIC insurance subsidiary in favor of Columbia Hospital for Women
Medical Center, Inc. was affirmed on appeal by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
NCRIC has filed a petition for rehearing with the Court of Appeals. At September 30, 2008
ProAssurance carries a liability of $22.3 million related to the judgment, including an estimate
for post-trial interest and legal costs.
In
mid-October ProAssurance announced the purchase of Georgia Lawyers
Insurance Company (Georgia Lawyers) for approximately
$4.3 million in cash. The transaction is subject to approval by
the Georgia Department of Insurance but is expected to close by the
first quarter of 2009. Georgia Lawyers provides professional
liability insurance for lawyers in the state of Georgia and reported
premiums written of $5.5 million in 2007.
ProAssurance announced in late October 2008 that the PICA Group (PICA) will become part of
ProAssurance through an all cash sponsored demutualization. The transaction is expected to utilize
cash of approximately $135 million, including credits of $15 million to be refunded to eligible
policyholders over three years, beginning in 2010. PICA primarily provides professional liability
coverages to doctors of podiatric medicine throughout most of the United States and had gross
written premium of $99 million in 2007. The transaction is subject to the approval of PICA
policyholders and insurance regulators in Illinois. The transaction is expected to close in the
first quarter of 2009.
18
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to those statements which accompany this report as well
as ProAssurances Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2007, which includes a
glossary of insurance terms and phrases. Throughout the discussion, references to ProAssurance,
we, us and our refers to ProAssurance Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. The
discussion contains certain forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties. As
discussed under Forward-Looking Statements, our actual financial condition and operating results
could differ significantly from these forward-looking statements.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Preparation of these
financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts we
report on those statements. We evaluate these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis based
on current and historical developments, market conditions, industry trends and other information
that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. There can be no assurance that actual
results will conform to our estimates and assumptions; reported results of operations may be
materially affected by changes in these estimates and assumptions.
Management considers the following accounting estimates to be critical because they involve
significant judgment by management and the effect of those judgments could result in a material
effect on our financial statements.
Reserve for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses (reserve for losses or reserve)
The largest component of our liabilities is our reserve for losses and the largest component
of expense for our operations is incurred losses. Net losses in any period reflect our estimate of
net losses incurred related to the premiums earned in that period as well as any changes to our
estimates of the reserve established for net losses of prior periods.
The estimation of medical professional liability losses is inherently difficult. Ultimate loss
costs, even for claims with similar characteristics, vary significantly depending upon many
factors, including but not limited to, the nature of the injury and the personal situation of the
claimant or the claimants family, the outcome of jury trials, the legislative and judicial climate
where the insured event occurred, general economic conditions and the trend of health care costs.
Medical professional liability claims are typically resolved over an extended period of time, often
five years or more. The combination of changing conditions and the extended time required for claim
resolution results in a loss cost estimation process that requires actuarial skill and the
application of judgment, and such estimates require periodic revision.
In establishing our reserve for losses, management considers a variety of factors including
claims frequency, historical paid and incurred loss development trends, the effect of inflation on
medical care, general economic trends and the legal environment. We perform an in-depth review of
our reserve for losses on a semi-annual basis. Additionally, during each reporting period we update
and review the data underlying the estimation of our reserve for losses and make adjustments that
we believe best reflect emerging data. Any adjustments are reflected in the then-current
operations. Due to the size of our reserve for losses, even a small percentage adjustment to these
estimates could have a material effect on our results of operations for the period in which the
adjustment is made.
19
Reinsurance
We use insurance and reinsurance (collectively, reinsurance) to provide capacity to write
larger limits of liability, to provide protection against losses in excess of policy limits, and to
stabilize underwriting results in years in which higher losses occur. The purchase of reinsurance
does not relieve us from the ultimate risk on our policies, but it does provide reimbursement for
certain losses we pay.
We evaluate each of our ceded reinsurance contracts at inception to determine if there is
sufficient risk transfer to allow the contract to be accounted for as reinsurance under current
accounting guidance. At September 30, 2008 all ceded contracts are accounted for as risk
transferring contracts.
Our receivable from reinsurers on unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses represents our
estimate of the amount of our reserve for losses that will be recoverable under our insurance and
reinsurance programs. We base our estimate of funds recoverable upon our expectation of ultimate
losses and the portion of those losses that we estimate to be allocable to reinsurers based upon
the terms of our reinsurance agreements.
We estimate premiums ceded under reinsurance agreements wherein the premium due to the
reinsurer, subject to certain maximums and minimums, is based in part on losses reimbursed or to be
reimbursed under the agreement. Our estimates of the amounts due from and to reinsurers are
regularly reviewed and updated by management as new data becomes available. Our assessment of the
collectibility of the recorded amounts receivable from reinsurers considers the payment history of
the reinsurer, publicly available financial and rating agency data, our interpretation of the
underlying contracts and policies, and responses by reinsurers. Appropriate reserves are
established for any balances we believe may not be collected.
Given the uncertainty of the ultimate amounts of our losses, our estimates of losses and
related amounts recoverable may vary significantly from the eventual outcome. Any adjustments are
reflected in then-current operations. Due to the size of our reinsurance balances, an adjustment to
these estimates could have a material effect on our results of operations for the period in which
the adjustment is made.
Investment Valuations
We adopted a new accounting pronouncement, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 157,
Fair Value Measurements, effective January 1, 2008. The new pronouncement revises the definition of
fair value and establishes a framework for measuring fair value. The pronouncement defines fair
value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The framework establishes
a three level hierarchy for valuing assets and liabilities based on how transparent (observable)
the inputs are that are used to determine fair value. For example, a quoted market price for an
actively traded security on an established trading exchange is considered the most transparent
(observable) input used to establish a fair value for that security and is classified as a Level 1
in the fair value hierarchy. An investment valued using multiple broker dealer quotes is considered
to be valued using observable input that is not as transparent as a quoted market price on an
exchange and is classified as a Level 2. An investment valued using either a single broker dealer
quote or based on a cash flow valuation model is considered to be valued based on limited
observable input and a significant amount of judgment and is classified as Level 3. For further
information on the adoption of the pronouncement and the fair value of our investments, see Note 2
to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Virtually all of our financial assets are comprised of investments recorded at fair value. Of
the Companys investments recorded at fair value totaling $3.4 billion, approximately 98% of our
investments are based on observable market prices, observable market parameters (i.e. broker
quotes, benchmark yield curves, issuer spreads, bids, etc.) or are derived from such prices or
parameters. The availability of observable market prices and pricing parameters (referred to as
observable inputs) can vary from investment to investment. We utilize observable inputs, where
available, to value our investments. In many cases, we obtain multiple observable inputs for an
investment to derive the fair value without requiring significant judgments.
20
We use a pricing service, Interactive Data Corporation (IDC), to value our investments that
have observable market prices and observable market parameters. All securities priced by IDC using
an exchange traded price are a Level 1 designation. For securities not actively traded on an
exchange, IDC typically uses multiple observable inputs including last reported trade, broker
quotes, benchmark yield curves, issuer spreads, two sided markets, benchmark securities, bids,
offers, and assumed prepayment speeds. These securities are designated as Level 2. We review the
pricing as received from IDC for reasonableness each quarter. To date, no IDC prices have been
adjusted.
For investments that are not actively traded, limited or no observable inputs may be available
and fair value is determined using valuation techniques appropriate for that investment whether
valued internally or externally. The valuation techniques involve some degree of judgment.
Approximately $60 million (2% of investments recorded at fair value) are valued using less
observable market inputs and valuation techniques and consist of asset-backed securities that are
priced by external managers using single broker dealer quotes, private placements, and other
investments valued internally by management.
Most of our investments recorded at fair value are considered available-for-sale with a small
portion classified as trading. For investments considered as available-for-sale, changes in the
fair value are recognized as unrealized gains and losses and are included, net of related tax
effects, in stockholders equity as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). Gains or
losses on these investments are recognized in earnings in the period the investment is sold or an
other-than-temporary impairment is deemed to have occurred. Changes in the fair value of
investments considered as trading are recorded in realized investment gains and losses in the
current period.
We also have other investments, primarily comprised of equity interests in private investment
funds (non-public investment partnerships and limited liability companies), $46.5 million of which
are accounted for using the equity method and $32.8 million of which are carried at cost. We
evaluate these investments for other-than-temporary impairment by considering any declines in fair
value below the recorded value. Determining whether there has been a decline in fair value involves
assumptions and estimates as there are typically no observable inputs to determine the fair value
of these investments.
We evaluate all our investments on at least a quarterly basis for declines in fair value that
represent other-than-temporary impairments. Some of the factors we consider in the evaluation of
our investments are:
|
|
|
the extent to which the fair value of an investment is less than its
recorded basis, |
|
|
|
|
the length of time for which the fair value of the investment has been
less than its recorded basis, |
|
|
|
|
the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer underlying
the investment, taking into consideration the economic prospects of the
issuers industry and geographical region, to the extent that information
is publicly available, |
|
|
|
|
third party research and credit rating reports, |
|
|
|
|
the extent to which the decline in fair value is attributable to credit
risk specifically associated with an investment or its issuer, |
|
|
|
|
the extent to which we believe market assessments of credit risk for a
specific investment or category of investments are either well founded or
are speculative, |
|
|
|
|
our internal assessments and those of our external portfolio managers
regarding specific circumstances surrounding an investment, which can cause
us to believe the investment is more or less likely to recover its value
than other investments with a similar structure, |
|
|
|
|
for asset backed securities: the origination date of the underlying
loans, the remaining average life, the probability that credit performance
of the underlying loans will deteriorate in the future, and our assessment
of the quality of the collateral underlying the loan, and |
|
|
|
|
our ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. |
21
Determining whether a decline in the fair value of investments is an other-than-temporary
impairment may also involve a variety of assumptions and estimates, particularly for investments
that are not actively traded in established markets or during periods of market dislocation. For
example, assessing the value of certain investments requires us to perform an analysis of expected
future cash flows or prepayments. For investments in tranches of structured transactions, we are
required to assess the credit worthiness of the underlying investments of the structured
transaction.
When we judge a decline in fair value to be other-than-temporary, we reduce the basis of the
investment to fair value and recognize a loss in the current period income statement for the amount
of the reduction. In subsequent periods, we base any measurement of gain or loss or decline in
value upon the adjusted cost basis of the investment.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
Policy acquisition costs, primarily commissions, premium taxes and underwriting salaries,
which are primarily and directly related to the acquisition of new and renewal premiums are
capitalized as deferred policy acquisition costs and charged to expense as the related premium
revenue is recognized. We evaluate the recoverability of our deferred policy acquisition costs and
any amounts estimated to be unrecoverable are charged to expense in the current period.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Guidance
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible
Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement),
which will alter the accounting for our Convertible Debentures. FSP APB 14-1 requires issuers to
account for convertible debt securities that allow for either mandatory or optional cash settlement
(including partial cash settlement) by separating the liability and equity components in a manner
that reflects the issuers nonconvertible debt borrowing rate at the time of issuance and requires
recognition of additional (non-cash) interest expense in subsequent periods based on the
nonconvertible rate. Additionally, FSP APB 14-1 requires that when such debt instruments are repaid
or converted any consideration transferred at settlement is to be allocated between the
extinguishment of the liability component and the reacquisition of the equity component. FSP APB
14-1 will become effective for ProAssurance on January 1, 2009 and must be applied retrospectively
with a cumulative effect adjustment being made as of the earliest period presented. Early adoption
is not permitted. We are currently assessing the impact that the adoption will have on our
financial condition and results of operations but expect no impact on Total Stockholders Equity
after the conversion of the Convertible Debentures (July 2008).
In December 2007 the FASB issued SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements. SFAS 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) 51 to establish accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of
a subsidiary. The Statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. We will adopt the
Statement on its effective date. The adoption is not expected to have an effect on our results of
operations or financial position.
22
In December 2007 the FASB issued SFAS 141 (Revised December 2007), Business Combinations. SFAS
141R replaces FASB Statement No. 141, Business Combinations, but retains the fundamental
requirement in SFAS 141 that the acquisition method (referred to as the purchase method in SFAS
141) of accounting be used for all business combinations. SFAS 141R provides new or additional
guidance with respect to business combinations including: defining the acquirer in a transaction,
the valuation of assets and liabilities when noncontrolling interests exist, the treatment of
contingent consideration, the treatment of costs incurred to effect the acquisition, the treatment
of reorganization costs, and the valuation of assets and liabilities when the purchase price is
below the net fair value of assets acquired. SFAS 141R applies prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. We will
adopt the Statement on its effective date.
Accounting Changes
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. The standard revises the
definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is applicable to other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements but does not establish new guidance
regarding the assets and liabilities required or allowed to be measured at fair value. The
statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with early adoption
permitted. We adopted SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008. We did not recognize any cumulative effect
related to the adoption of SFAS 157 and the adoption did not have a significant effect on our
results of operations or financial condition.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS 159 permits many
financial assets and liabilities to be reported at fair value that are not otherwise required under
GAAP to be measured at fair value. Under SFAS 159 guidance, the election of fair value treatment is
specific to individual assets and liabilities, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings as
they occur. The election of fair value measurement is generally irrevocable. SFAS 159 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with early adoption permitted. We adopted SFAS
159 on January 1, 2008 but did not elect fair value measurement for any financial assets or
liabilities that were not otherwise required to be measured at fair value.
Change in Chairman of the Board
On September 22, 2008, A. Derrill Crowe, M.D. resigned as non-executive Chairman of the Board
and from his position as a director, for personal reasons. On October 16, 2008, our Board of
Directors elected our CEO, W. Stancil Starnes, to serve as the Chairman of the Board.
23
Liquidity and Capital Resources and Financial Condition
Overview
ProAssurance Corporation is a holding company and is a legal entity separate and distinct from
its subsidiaries. Because it has no other business operations, dividends from its operating
subsidiaries represent a significant source of funds for its obligations, including debt service.
The ability of our insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends is subject to limitation by state
insurance regulations. See our discussions under Regulation of Dividends and Other Payments from
Our Operating Subsidiaries in Part I, and in Note 15 of our Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in our December 31, 2007 Form 10K for additional information regarding the ordinary
dividends that can be paid by our insurance subsidiaries in 2008. In August 2008 we received
dividends of $125 million from and also contributed $25 million of capital to our insurance
subsidiaries. At September 30, 2008 we held cash and investments of approximately $187 million
outside of our insurance subsidiaries that are available for use without regulatory approval. Cash
of approximately $139 million will be used in the ProAssurance-sponsored demutualization of PICA and the purchase of Georgia Lawyers, both of which are expected to
close by the first quarter of 2009 as discussed in Note 11
to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Cash Flows
The principal components of our operating cash flows are the excess of net investment income
and premiums collected over net losses paid and operating costs, including income taxes. Timing
delays exist between the collection of premiums and the ultimate payment of losses. Premiums are
generally collected within the twelve-month period after the policy is written while our claim
payments are generally paid over a more extended period of time. Likewise, timing delays exist
between the payment of claims and the collection of reinsurance recoveries. Our operating
activities provided positive cash flows of approximately $142.0 million and $207.2 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The decline in operating cash flows in 2008 as compared to 2007 primarily reflects lower
premium receipts due to the decline in premiums written during 2008, and also reflects higher
income tax payments (attributable to an increase in taxable income in the fourth quarter of 2007 as
compared to the fourth quarter of 2006) and the effect of trading security sales in 2007 of
approximately $44 million versus trading security purchases in 2008 of approximately $3 million.
These declines in operating cash flows are offset by lower loss payments, net of reinsurance
received (including $24 million received related to the commutation of a number of prior year
reinsurance contracts).
Two metrics commonly used to analyze the operating cash flows of insurance companies are the
net paid-to-incurred ratio and the net paid loss ratio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net paid-to-incurred ratio |
|
|
136.1 |
% |
|
|
98.2 |
% |
|
|
114.4 |
% |
|
|
94.5 |
% |
Net paid loss ratio |
|
|
78.2 |
% |
|
|
63.8 |
% |
|
|
69.5 |
% |
|
|
66.7 |
% |
The net paid-to-incurred ratio is calculated as net paid losses divided by net incurred
losses. The net paid loss ratio is calculated as net paid losses divided by net premiums earned. In
calculating both of these ratios, net paid losses is defined as losses and loss adjustment expenses
paid during the period, net of the anticipated reinsurance recoveries related to those losses.
For a long-tailed business such as ProAssurance, fluctuations in the ratios over short periods
of time are not unexpected and are not necessarily indicative of either positive or negative
changes in loss experience. The timing of our indemnity payments is affected by many factors,
including the nature and number of the claims in process during any one period and the speed at
which cases work through the trial and appellate process. The ratios are affected not only by
variations in net paid losses, but also by variations in premium volume and the recognition of
reserve development.
Net paid losses decreased in 2008 as compared to 2007 by $27 million. However, the net paid
loss ratios and net paid-to-incurred ratios have increased as compared to 2007 due to the effects
of lower values for the denominators in each ratio (net earned premiums for the paid loss ratio;
net incurred losses
24
for the paid-to-incurred ratio) even though we also experienced a decline in net paid losses.
Net earned premiums and net incurred losses both reflect reductions in insured risks in 2008 as
compared to 2007; net incurred losses also reflect a greater amount of prior year favorable net
loss development in 2008 than 2007.
Losses paid in 2008 have not, as a whole, exceeded amounts reserved for those losses as of
December 31, 2007, nor has the payment of losses accelerated in an unexpected manner. In the
contractual obligations table included in Part II of our December 31, 2007 Form 10K we projected,
largely based on historical payment patterns, that we would pay gross losses of $541 million during
2008 related to the reserves that were established at December 31, 2007. Through September 30,
2008, our gross loss payments total approximately $320 million, which, when annualized, is
consistent with and lower than the amount estimated for purposes of the table.
Recent Events
During the third quarter of 2008 and continuing into the fourth quarter the financial markets
have experienced unusual turmoil and there have been a number of market events which have affected
our investment results for the quarter. Our investment portfolio was directly affected by the U.S.
Treasury conservatorship of Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and Federal Home
Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), the Federal Reserves lending facility to American
International Group, Inc. (AIG), the declaration of bankruptcy by Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc.
(Lehman Brothers), and the ratings downgrades and subsequent FDIC facilitated sale of Washington
Mutual Bank (Washington Mutual). We filed an 8K regarding our exposures to these entities on
September 17, 2008. The following table presents an updated listing of our direct exposures to
these financial institutions and the impact on our investment results during the quarter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
Ending Value as of |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
Proceeds from |
|
Net Realized |
|
Other Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale or |
|
Investment |
|
Temporary |
|
Amortized |
|
Market |
|
Unrealized |
(In thousands) |
|
Redemption |
|
Losses |
|
Impairments |
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
Fannie Mae Preferred Stock* |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(8,501 |
) |
|
$ |
421 |
|
|
$ |
421 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fannie Mae Senior Debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
42,433 |
|
|
$ |
43,400 |
|
|
$ |
967 |
|
Fannie Mae Discount Note |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,797 |
|
|
$ |
2,797 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Freddie Mac Common Stock |
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(299 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Freddie Mac Preferred Stock |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(967 |
) |
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Freddie Mac Senior Debt |
|
$ |
(9,200 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
52,545 |
|
|
$ |
53,214 |
|
|
$ |
669 |
|
Freddie Mac Discount Note |
|
$ |
(200 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Lehman Brothers Senior Debt |
|
$ |
(1,058 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,995 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,862 |
) |
|
$ |
2,719 |
|
|
$ |
2,719 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
AIG Senior Debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(395 |
) |
|
$ |
566 |
|
|
$ |
566 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
AIG Common Stock |
|
$ |
(107 |
) |
|
$ |
(78 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Washington Mutual Debt |
|
$ |
(785 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,644 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Reserve Primary Fund (see below) |
|
$ |
(48,505 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,010 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Sold at gain of $56,000 in October 2008 |
In addition to the direct exposures indicated in the table above, we have indirect exposure to
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac through $428 million in mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by these
agencies. We have assessed the individual securities for other-than-temporary impairment and
determined that no write-downs are warranted in the third quarter based on our review of expected
future cash flows and our intent and ability to hold these securities until recovery.
Transatlantic Re (Transatlantic) has been one of our reinsurers for a number of years and we
estimate that the amount owed to us by Transatlantic as of September 30, 2008 approximates $23
million. Transatlantic is an independent publicly traded company (NYSE) and, while AIG owns 59% of
Transatlantic, the Transatlantic Board of Directors is not controlled by AIG. To date in 2008,
Transatlantic has continued to reimburse us for paid claims in a manner consistent with its past
practices. As of
25
September 30, we have not recognized any reduction to Transatlantic reinsurance receivables
for credit reasons.
In connection with the recent credit market events, the net asset value of our $49.5 million
investment in the Reserve Primary Fund (the Reserve Fund), a money market fund, fell below $1 per
share during the third quarter. We requested redemption of our holdings, realizing a loss of $1.0
million during the third quarter. The amount due us of $48.5 million is recorded as a receivable as
of September 30, 2008 and is included in Other Assets. To date,
$25.1 million of this balance has been received;
the remainder may not be received for some time due to liquidity issues faced by the Reserve Fund. At this
time we do not expect to experience any additional loss in value and
do not believe a valuation allowance against the receivable is
required.
Financial institutions, as a whole, have been particularly affected by the recent credit
crisis. As of September 30, 2008 we hold fixed income securities of financial institutions that
have a fair value of approximately $284 million (adjusted cost basis of the securities is
approximately $312 million). The average rating of these securities is between AA- and A+ and the
duration is approximately 2.5 years. The value of these
securities or ultimate settlement of obligations is subject to the
financial performance of these entities. Our largest fixed income exposures are to Bank of
America/Merrill Lynch, totaling $25.4 million ($27.3 million cost). We have indirect exposure to JP
Morgan related to our business owned life insurance policies, of which $16.5 million is held in a
separate account with a stable value agreement guaranteed by JP Morgan. In light of the recent
credit crisis and market dislocations, these institutions have experienced market disruptions.
Mortgage backed securities are generally categorized according to the expected credit quality
of underlying mortgage loans. Generally, subprime loans are issued to borrowers with lower credit
ratings while Alt-A borrowers have better credit ratings but the mortgage loan is of a type
regarded as having a higher risk profile. As of September 30, 2008, we hold securities with a fair
value of approximately $13.4 million (adjusted cost basis of approximately $15.7 million) that are
supported by collateral we classify as subprime, of which approximately 59% are AAA rated, 33% are
AA, 4% are A, 3% are BBB, and 1% are BB. Additionally we have approximately $1.4 million (adjusted
cost basis of approximately $5.5 million) of securities with exposure to below investment grade
fixed income securities with subprime exposure that are held in a high-yield investment fund; the
average rating of the securities is B. We also hold securities with a fair value of approximately
$12.3 million (adjusted cost basis of approximately $12.9 million) that are supported by privately
issued residential mortgage backed securities we classify as Alt-A, of which approximately 41% are
AAA rated, 25% are AA, 27% are A, and 7% are A-. Ratings given are as of September 30, 2008. During
2008 we evaluated our securities with subprime and Alt-A exposures and recognized
other-than-temporary impairments of $788,000 for the three months and $4.9 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008.
Fair
values of fixed maturity and equity securities declined during the third quarter due to widening interest spreads, declines in credit quality and
increased uncertainty regarding the future of the U.S. economy. At
September 30, 2008 pre-tax net unrealized losses on our
available-for sale securities are $78.3 million as compared to
pre-tax unrealized losses of $16.0 million at June 30, 2008. To
date in the fourth quarter, financial markets have continued to
exhibit volatility and market values are overall lower at the end of October than at September 30,
2008. As of October 28, 2008 the net unrealized losses on our available-for-sale portfolio
approximate $124 million, which is consistent with declines
seen in market indices applicable to the securities we hold. It is difficult to predict when market prices will stabilize; however,
we are unaware of facts or circumstances that would warrant additional other-than-temporary
impairment write-downs at September 30, 2008. A complete listing of our investment holdings as of
September 30, 2008, may be obtained from the Investor Home
Page Supplemental Investor Information
section of our website.
On October 3, 2008 the 2008 Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (EESA) was signed into law.
This legislation is intended to reestablish liquidity in US financial markets and to promote
financial market stability. EESA authorizes the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury to establish the
Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) for the repurchase of up to $700 billion of mortgage backed
securities and other troubled financial instruments from financial institutions. Among other EESA
provisions are tax code revisions, budget measures, guidance related to the administration of TARP,
and measures intended to mitigate mortgage foreclosures. The authority under EESA to purchase and
insure assets expires December 31, 2009 but may, with certification of need to Congress, be extended
to December 31, 2010.
26
Investments
The following table provides the percentage breakdown of Total Investments by investment
category at September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
of Total |
Investment Category |
|
Investments |
Fixed maturities available for sale, at fair value |
|
|
86.3 |
% |
Short-term investments |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
Business owned life insurance |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
Other |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
Equity securities, trading, at fair value |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Equity securities, available for sale, at fair value |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
We manage our investments to ensure that we will have sufficient liquidity to meet our
obligations, taking into consideration the timing of cash flows from our investments, including
interest payments, dividends and principal payments, as well as the expected cash flows to be
generated by our operations. Typically, between $50 million and $75 million of our investments
mature or are paid down in a given quarter and are available, if needed, to meet our cash flow
requirements. At our insurance subsidiaries level, the primary outflow of cash is related to net
paid losses and operating costs, including income taxes. The payment of individual claims cannot be
predicted with certainty; therefore, we rely upon the history of paid claims in estimating the
timing of future claims payments. To the extent that we have an unanticipated shortfall in cash we
may either liquidate securities or borrow funds under previously established borrowing
arrangements. However, given the relatively short duration of our investments, we do not foresee
any such shortfall.
We held cash and short-term securities of $303.3 million at September 30, 2008 as compared to
$260.1 million at December 31, 2007. The increased balance as of September 30, 2008 is net of the
redemption of our $49.5 million interest in the Reserve Primary Fund, as discussed under Recent
Events, and reflects our intent to hold additional funds in our short-term portfolio in
response to the instability of credit markets.
Our investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries increased to $46.5 million at September 30, 2008
as compared to $26.8 million at December 31, 2007. During the first quarter of 2008 we increased
our investment in one of our unconsolidated subsidiaries by $20 million in order to take advantage
of dislocations in the credit market.
Approximately
98% of our fixed maturities are either United States government agency
obligations or investment grade securities as determined by national rating agencies. Our
available-for-sale fixed maturities have a dollar weighted average rating of AA at September 30,
2008. The weighted average effective duration of our fixed maturity securities at September 30,
2008 is 4.4 years; the weighted average effective duration of our fixed maturity securities and our
short-term securities combined is 4.1 years.
27
Fixed maturity securities have declined in value in 2008, particularly in the third quarter
and continuing into the fourth quarter, reflecting widespread concern regarding the credit quality
of financial institutions, the future of U.S. credit markets in general, and fears that the U.S.
will experience a severe economic recession. Although treasury yields at September 30, 2008
declined as compared to December 31, 2007, spreads have widened
which has reduced the fair value of
our securities. Changes in market interest rate levels generally affect our net income to the
extent that reinvestment yields are different than the yields on maturing securities. Changes in
market interest rates also affect the fair value of our fixed maturity securities. On a pre-tax
basis, net unrealized gains (losses) on our available-for-sale fixed maturity securities are
comprised as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Gross unrealized gains |
|
$ |
18.0 |
|
|
$ |
37.2 |
|
Gross unrealized (losses) |
|
|
(95.8 |
) |
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) |
|
$ |
(77.8 |
) |
|
$ |
19.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have the intent, and, due to the duration of our overall portfolio and positive cash flows,
believe we have the ability to hold bonds in an unrealized loss
position to recovery of book value or maturity and do not
consider the declines in value to be other-than-temporary. For a discussion of the potential
effects that future changes in interest rates may have on our investment portfolio see Item 3,
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Our investments in securities classified as Alt-A mortgage backed securities, subprime
mortgage backed securities and various other asset backed securities have become less liquid than
they have been historically due to recent market turmoil and resulting liquidity disruptions. While
the markets for these securities have temporarily become more intermittent and less active, trades
are occurring. We determine the fair value of these securities by obtaining information from IDC
which includes trade data. We confirmed the reasonableness of the fair value of these securities as
of September 30, 2008 by reviewing market yields of the securities. Current yields are
substantially elevated and reflect those seen on similar securities of similar credit quality and
collateral. In addition to these securities which have become illiquid as a result of current
market disruptions, we historically have purchased certain other investments that do not have a
readily available market, which includes private placements, limited partnerships, inverse coupon
mortgage backed securities, municipal auction rate securities and Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
capital stock. The net unrealized gains (losses) as of September 30, 2008 associated with
securities currently considered to be illiquid are detailed in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Values at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Unrealized |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Gains (Losses) |
|
Fixed maturities, available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage backed securities classified as: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inverse coupon |
|
$ |
22,115 |
|
|
$ |
1,532 |
|
Alt-A |
|
|
10,240 |
|
|
|
(902 |
) |
Subprime |
|
|
13,390 |
|
|
|
(2,288 |
) |
Prime, privately issued |
|
|
42,603 |
|
|
|
(3,242 |
) |
Prime, agency issued |
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Other asset backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timber land |
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Hotel |
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
Manufactured housing |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
Other |
|
|
2,494 |
|
|
|
(482 |
) |
Corporate bonds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privately placed |
|
|
39,222 |
|
|
|
(1,136 |
) |
Equipment trusts |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal auction rated bonds |
|
|
10,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity, available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privately placed |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
(390 |
) |
Other investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB capital stock |
|
|
5,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partnerships |
|
|
13,129 |
|
|
|
(7,576 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
161,572 |
|
|
$ |
(14,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
We believe the fair values of these securities reflect declines due to the market disruptions
and are below the true economic value. The unrealized losses should reverse over the remaining
lives of the securities should no further deterioration of collateral relative to our position in
the securities capital structures be experienced.
Equity investments represent less than 1% of our total investments and less than 3% of our
stockholders equity at both September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. At September 30, 2008, the
carrying value of our equity investments (including equities in our available-for-sale and trading
portfolios) totaled $23.7 million as compared to $29.6 million at December 31, 2007. The decline in
our equity investments is primarily attributable to the impairment of Fannie Mae preferred
securities.
Reinsurance
We use reinsurance to provide capacity to write larger limits of liability, to provide
protection against losses in excess of policy limits, and to stabilize underwriting results in
years in which higher losses occur. The purchase of reinsurance does not relieve us from the
ultimate risk on our policies, but it does provide reimbursement from the reinsurer for certain
losses paid by us.
Our risk retention level is dependent upon numerous factors including our risk appetite and
the capital we have to support it, the price and availability of reinsurance, volume of business,
level of experience and our analysis of the potential underwriting results within each state. We
purchase reinsurance from a number of companies to mitigate concentrations of credit risk. Our
reinsurance broker assists us in the analysis of the credit quality of our reinsurers. We base our
reinsurance buying decisions on an evaluation of the then-current financial strength, rating and
stability of prospective reinsurers. However, the financial strength of our reinsurers, and their
corresponding ability to pay us, may change in the future due to forces or events we cannot control
or anticipate.
Periodically, reinsurers may dispute our claim for reimbursement from them; however, we have
not experienced significant collection difficulties due to the financial condition of any
reinsurer. We have established appropriate reserves for any balances that we believe may not be
ultimately collected. Should future events lead us to believe that any reinsurer will not meet its
obligations to us, adjustments to the amounts recoverable would be reflected in the results of
current operations. Such an adjustment has the potential to be significant to the results of
operations in the period in which it is recorded; however, we would not expect such an adjustment
to have a material effect on our capital position or our liquidity.
29
Debt
Our long-term debt as of September 30, 2008 is comprised of the following.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
First |
|
(In thousands, except %) |
|
Rate |
|
2008 |
|
|
Redemption Date |
|
2034 Subordinated Debentures |
|
6.7%, LIBOR adjusted |
|
$ |
46,395 |
|
|
May 2009 |
2034 Surplus Notes |
|
7.7%, fixed until May 2009 |
|
|
11,901 |
|
|
May 2009* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
58,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Subject to approval by the Wisconsin Commissioner of Insurance |
A detailed description of our debt is provided in Note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
As discussed in Note 7, we completed the conversion of all of our outstanding Convertible
Debentures (aggregate principal of $107.6 million) in July 2008. Approximately 2,572,000 shares of
our common stock were issued in the transaction (conversion rate was 23.9037 per $1,000 debenture).
Of the common shares issued, approximately 2.12 million were reissued Treasury Shares and 450,000
were newly issued shares. The transaction resulted in a net increase to Stockholders Equity of
approximately $112.5 million in the third quarter of 2008. No gain or loss was recorded related to
the conversion. Because the dilutive effect of the debentures has
historically been included in our calculation
of diluted earnings per share, the conversion of the debentures did
not affect this
measurement. Book value increased approximately $0.28 per share from the conversion.
Treasury Stock
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we repurchased approximately 1.6 million of
our common shares having a total cost of $80.3 million (including approximately 360,000 shares
purchased at a cost of $17.3 million during the three months ended September 30, 2008). This fully
utilized the $150 million repurchase authorization approved by our Board of Directors in April
2007. On August 5, 2008 our Board of Directors authorized an additional $100 million for the
repurchase of common shares or retirement of outstanding debt. As of September 30, 2008 all $100.0
million of this repurchase authorization remains available for use.
Litigation
We are involved in various legal actions arising primarily from claims against us related to
insurance policies and claims handling, including, but not limited to, claims asserted by our
policyholders. Legal actions are generally divided into two categories: (1) Legal actions dealing
with claims and claim-related activities which we consider in our evaluation of our reserve for
losses, and (2) legal actions falling outside of these areas which we evaluate and reserve for
separately as a part of our Other Liabilities.
Claim-related actions are considered as a part of our reserving process under the guidance
provided by SFAS 60 Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises. We evaluate the likely
outcomes from these actions giving consideration to the facts and laws applicable to each case,
appellate issues, coverage issues, potential recoveries from our insurance and reinsurance
programs, and settlement discussions as well as our historical claims resolution practices. This
data is then given consideration in the overall evaluation of our reserve for losses.
For non-claim-related actions we evaluate each case separately and establish what we believe
is an appropriate reserve under the guidance provided by SFAS 5 Accounting for Contingencies. As a
result of the acquisition of NCRIC Corporation in 2005, we assumed the risk of loss for a judgment
entered against NCRIC, Inc. (NCRIC) on February 20, 2004 by a District of Columbia Superior Court
in favor of Columbia Hospital for Women Medical Center, Inc. (CHW) in the amount of $18.2 million
(the judgment), which was appealed. In October 2008 the judgment was affirmed by the District of
Columbia Court of Appeals. NCRIC has filed a petition for rehearing with the Court of Appeals. As
of September 30, 2008, we carry a $22.3 million liability related to the judgment, including an
estimate for post-trial interest and legal costs. Approximately $19.5 million of the liability was
established as a component of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the
allocation of the NCRIC purchase price.
30
There are risks, as outlined in our Risk Factors in Part 1 of our 10K, that any of these
actions could cost us more than our estimates. In particular, we or our insureds may receive
adverse verdicts; post-trial motions may be denied, in whole or in part; any appeals that may be
undertaken may be unsuccessful; we may be unsuccessful in our legal efforts to limit the scope of
coverage available to insureds; and we may become a party to bad faith litigation over the
settlement of a claim. To the extent that the cost of resolving these actions exceeds our
estimates, the legal actions could have a material effect on ProAssurances results of operations
in the period in which any such action is resolved.
31
Overview of Results-Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
Net income totaled $22.2 million and $101.4 million for the three-month and nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2008 as compared to $43.1 million and $116.8 million, respectively, for the
same periods in 2007. The decrease in net income for both the three and the nine month periods is
principally attributable to a substantial increase in the recognition of other-than-temporary
impairments in the third quarter of 2008. The effect of impairments was partially offset by an
increase of favorable prior year loss development in both the third quarter and the year-to-date
periods of 2008. Net income per diluted share was $0.66 and $2.98 for the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008, respectively, as compared to $1.23 and $3.31 for the
same periods in 2007. The decrease in diluted earnings per share was primarily attributable to the
decline in net income.
Results from the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 compare to the same respective
periods in 2007 as follows:
Revenues
Net premiums earned declined in 2008 by approximately $22.1 million (16%) for the three-month
period and $55.6 million (14%) for the nine-month period. The declines reflect the effects of a
highly competitive market place and rate reductions.
Our net investment result, which includes both net investment income and earnings from
unconsolidated subsidiaries, declined in 2008 by $2.6 million (6%) for the three-month period and
$11.1 million (9%) for the nine-month period. The decline primarily reflects lower interest rates
on short-term funds during 2008 and unfavorable conditions in the credit markets.
We recognized net realized investment losses during both the three-month and nine-month
periods of 2008, primarily due to the recognition of other-than-temporary impairments which
increased $29.4 million and $31.6 million for the quarter and year-to-date periods, respectively,
as compared to 2007. The 2008 impairments are primarily related to our investments in the preferred
stock of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and debt securities issued by Lehman Brothers, AIG, and
Washington Mutual.
Expenses
Net losses decreased in 2008 as compared to 2007 by $22.9 million for the three months and by
$73.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 due to a decline in insured risks and
increased recognition of favorable prior year loss development in 2008 of $5.0 million for the
third quarter and $20.7 million for the nine-month period. Underwriting, acquisition and insurance
expenses declined by approximately $2.9 million and $4.0 million for the comparative three- and
nine-month periods, respectively. Interest expense declined by $1.9 million and $3.1 million for
the three months and nine months, respectively, because of lower debt.
Ratios
Our net loss ratio decreased in 2008 by 7.5 points for the three-month period and 9.7 points
for the nine-month period as a result of the recognition of favorable net loss development as
discussed above. Our expense ratio increased by 1.4 points for the three months and 2.0 points for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to the decline in premium. Our operating
ratio decreased by 10.9 points for the three months and 11.0 points for the nine months. Return on
equity (annualized) decreased to 6.9% for the three-month period and to 10.5% for the nine-month
period.
32
Results of Operations-Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Three and Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2007
Selected consolidated financial data for each period is summarized in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
($ in thousands, except share data) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
126,122 |
|
|
$ |
149,138 |
|
|
$ |
(23,016 |
) |
|
$ |
374,393 |
|
|
$ |
440,186 |
|
|
$ |
(65,793 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written |
|
$ |
116,409 |
|
|
$ |
139,483 |
|
|
$ |
(23,074 |
) |
|
$ |
343,609 |
|
|
$ |
401,809 |
|
|
$ |
(58,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned |
|
$ |
123,733 |
|
|
$ |
147,130 |
|
|
$ |
(23,397 |
) |
|
$ |
382,158 |
|
|
$ |
446,437 |
|
|
$ |
(64,279 |
) |
Premiums ceded |
|
|
(10,284 |
) |
|
|
(11,622 |
) |
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
(32,364 |
) |
|
|
(41,089 |
) |
|
|
8,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
113,449 |
|
|
|
135,508 |
|
|
|
(22,059 |
) |
|
|
349,794 |
|
|
|
405,348 |
|
|
|
(55,554 |
) |
Net investment income |
|
|
39,845 |
|
|
|
41,075 |
|
|
|
(1,230 |
) |
|
|
122,218 |
|
|
|
128,194 |
|
|
|
(5,976 |
) |
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
(1,967 |
) |
|
|
(589 |
) |
|
|
(1,378 |
) |
|
|
(3,916 |
) |
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
(5,157 |
) |
Net realized investment gains (losses) |
|
|
(34,236 |
) |
|
|
1,321 |
|
|
|
(35,557 |
) |
|
|
(41,011 |
) |
|
|
(1,564 |
) |
|
|
(39,447 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
3,694 |
|
|
|
4,409 |
|
|
|
(715 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
118,088 |
|
|
|
178,617 |
|
|
|
(60,529 |
) |
|
|
430,779 |
|
|
|
537,628 |
|
|
|
(106,849 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
73,739 |
|
|
|
99,142 |
|
|
|
(25,403 |
) |
|
|
242,033 |
|
|
|
338,793 |
|
|
|
(96,760 |
) |
Reinsurance recoveries |
|
|
(8,516 |
) |
|
|
(11,034 |
) |
|
|
2,518 |
|
|
|
(29,457 |
) |
|
|
(52,844 |
) |
|
|
23,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss adjustment
expenses |
|
|
65,223 |
|
|
|
88,108 |
|
|
|
(22,885 |
) |
|
|
212,576 |
|
|
|
285,949 |
|
|
|
(73,373 |
) |
Underwriting, acquisition and
insurance expenses |
|
|
24,527 |
|
|
|
27,439 |
|
|
|
(2,912 |
) |
|
|
75,927 |
|
|
|
79,913 |
|
|
|
(3,986 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
1,141 |
|
|
|
3,006 |
|
|
|
(1,865 |
) |
|
|
5,855 |
|
|
|
8,950 |
|
|
|
(3,095 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
90,891 |
|
|
|
118,553 |
|
|
|
(27,662 |
) |
|
|
294,358 |
|
|
|
374,812 |
|
|
|
(80,454 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
27,197 |
|
|
|
60,064 |
|
|
|
(32,867 |
) |
|
|
136,421 |
|
|
|
162,816 |
|
|
|
(26,395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
4,950 |
|
|
|
16,952 |
|
|
|
(12,002 |
) |
|
|
34,988 |
|
|
|
45,993 |
|
|
|
(11,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
22,247 |
|
|
$ |
43,112 |
|
|
$ |
(20,865 |
) |
|
$ |
101,433 |
|
|
$ |
116,823 |
|
|
$ |
(15,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
(0.66 |
) |
|
$ |
3.12 |
|
|
$ |
3.53 |
|
|
$ |
(0.41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
$ |
(0.57 |
) |
|
$ |
2.98 |
|
|
$ |
3.31 |
|
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss ratio |
|
|
57.5 |
% |
|
|
65.0 |
% |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
60.8 |
% |
|
|
70.5 |
% |
|
|
(9.7 |
) |
Underwriting expense ratio |
|
|
21.6 |
% |
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
% |
|
|
19.7 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
79.1 |
% |
|
|
85.2 |
% |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
82.5 |
% |
|
|
90.2 |
% |
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating ratio |
|
|
44.0 |
% |
|
|
54.9 |
% |
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
|
|
47.6 |
% |
|
|
58.6 |
% |
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Return on equity* |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
33
Premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
($ in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
126,122 |
|
|
$ |
149,138 |
|
|
$ |
(23,016 |
) |
|
|
(15.4 |
%) |
|
$ |
374,393 |
|
|
$ |
440,186 |
|
|
$ |
(65,793 |
) |
|
|
(14.9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned |
|
$ |
123,733 |
|
|
$ |
147,130 |
|
|
$ |
(23,397 |
) |
|
|
(15.9 |
%) |
|
$ |
382,158 |
|
|
$ |
446,437 |
|
|
$ |
(64,279 |
) |
|
|
(14.4 |
%) |
Premiums ceded |
|
|
(10,284 |
) |
|
|
(11,622 |
) |
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
(11.5 |
%) |
|
|
(32,364 |
) |
|
|
(41,089 |
) |
|
|
8,725 |
|
|
|
(21.2 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
$ |
113,449 |
|
|
$ |
135,508 |
|
|
$ |
(22,059 |
) |
|
|
(16.3 |
%) |
|
$ |
349,794 |
|
|
$ |
405,348 |
|
|
$ |
(55,554 |
) |
|
|
(13.7 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Premiums Written
Gross premiums written declined during both the three- and nine-month periods ended September
30, 2008 as compared to the same periods in 2007, reflecting the effects of lower premium rates and
a very competitive market. During 2007 we began to recognize improving loss trends in our rate
making analysis, and have lowered the rates we charge our insureds where indicated. As policies
take effect at these lower rates our premiums written have declined. For our physician business,
which is discussed in more detail below, on our renewed business, our charged rates reflect average
decreases of 7% for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. Charged rates include
the effects of filed rates, surcharges and discounts. Our competitors have also lowered rates, and
we face strong price-based competition in virtually all of our markets. Our retention rate has
remained above 85% but the acquisition of new business continues to be challenging. Despite
competitive pressures, we remain committed to a rate structure that will allow us to fulfill our
obligations to our insureds, including excellent claims and customer services as well as adequate
loss reserves, while still generating fair returns for our stockholders.
Physician premiums represent 83% and 84% of gross premiums written during the three months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively (84% and 85% for the same respective nine-month
periods) but amounts written in 2008 have declined as compared to 2007, as shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
($ in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physician Premiums* |
|
$ |
105,228 |
|
|
$ |
124,591 |
|
|
$ |
(19,363 |
) |
|
|
(15.5 |
%) |
|
$ |
313,962 |
|
|
$ |
373,847 |
|
|
$ |
(59,885 |
) |
|
|
(16.0 |
%) |
|
|
|
* |
|
Exclusive of tail premiums as discussed below |
Our overall retention rate (without adjustment to eliminate retirees or any risks not sought
to be renewed by us) is approximately 87% for both three- and nine-month periods ended September
30, 2008, respectively, as compared to 86% for both the three- and the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2007.
Premiums written for non-physician coverages represent 12% and 11% of our total gross premiums
written for the three months and 11% of our total gross premiums written for both of the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
($ in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-physician
Premiums* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital and facility |
|
$ |
6,484 |
|
|
$ |
7,585 |
|
|
$ |
(1,101 |
) |
|
|
(14.5 |
%) |
|
$ |
22,031 |
|
|
$ |
24,541 |
|
|
$ |
(2,510 |
) |
|
|
(10.2 |
%) |
Other non-physician |
|
|
7,871 |
|
|
|
8,850 |
|
|
|
(979 |
) |
|
|
(11.1 |
%) |
|
|
20,453 |
|
|
|
22,023 |
|
|
|
(1,570 |
) |
|
|
(7.1 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,355 |
|
|
$ |
16,435 |
|
|
$ |
(2,080 |
) |
|
|
(12.7 |
%) |
|
$ |
42,484 |
|
|
$ |
46,564 |
|
|
$ |
(4,080 |
) |
|
|
(8.8 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Exclusive of tail premiums as discussed below |
Hospital and facility coverages are the most significant component of non-physician premiums
and represent 5% of our total gross premiums written for both of the three-month periods ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, and represent 6% of our total gross premiums written for both of the
nine-month periods in 2008 and 2007. Other non-physician coverages consist primarily of
professional liability coverages provided to lawyers and to other health care professionals such as
dentists and nurses. We are seeing the same competitive pressures in these areas as we are seeing
in our physician business.
We are required to offer extended reporting endorsement or tail policies to insureds that
are discontinuing their claims-made coverage with us, but we do not market such coverages
separately. The
34
amount of tail premium written and earned can vary widely from period to period. Tail premiums
totaled approximately $6.5 million and $17.9 million (5% of gross written premiums for both
periods) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, representing
decreases of $1.6 million and $1.8 million as compared to the same respective periods in 2007.
Premiums Earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
($ in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned |
|
$ |
123,733 |
|
|
$ |
147,130 |
|
|
$ |
(23,397 |
) |
|
|
(15.9 |
%) |
|
$ |
382,158 |
|
|
$ |
446,437 |
|
|
$ |
(64,279 |
) |
|
|
(14.4 |
%) |
Because premiums are generally earned pro rata over the entire policy period, fluctuations in
premiums earned tend to lag those of premiums written. Our policies generally carry a term of one
year. Tail premiums are 100% earned in the period written because the policies insure only
incidents that occurred in prior periods and are not cancellable.
Exclusive of the effect of tail premiums, the decline in premiums earned for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007 reflects declines in
gross premiums written during 2007 and 2008, as well as a decline of $72,000 for the three months
and $10.1 million for the nine months that is due to premium earned in 2007 related to unearned
premiums acquired in the merger with PIC Wisconsin.
During the twelve months preceding September 30, 2008, our written premiums have declined as
compared to written premiums for the twelve months preceding September 30, 2007. Consequently, 2008
earned premiums are expected to continue to be lower than 2007 earned premiums.
Premiums Ceded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
($ in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums ceded |
|
$ |
10,284 |
|
|
$ |
11,622 |
|
|
$ |
(1,338 |
) |
|
|
(11.5 |
%) |
|
$ |
32,364 |
|
|
$ |
41,089 |
|
|
$ |
(8,725 |
) |
|
|
(21.2 |
%) |
Premiums ceded represent the portion of earned premiums that we pay our reinsurers for their
assumption of a portion of our losses. The premium that we cede to our reinsurers is determined, in
part, by the loss experience (subject to minimums and maximums) of the business ceded to them. It
takes a number of years before all losses are known, and in the intervening period, premiums due to
the reinsurers are estimated.
Our reinsurance expense ratio (premiums ceded as a percentage of premiums earned) is 8.3% and
8.5% for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 as compared to 9.2% and
9.0% (exclusive of certain non-recurring items as detailed in the next paragraph) for the
three-month and nine-month periods of 2007. The decrease in the ratio in 2008 is primarily because
ceded business decreased as compared to 2007, both in amount and in proportion to retained
business. Also, in 2007 a portion of PIC Wisconsin premiums were earned under pre-acquisition
reinsurance arrangements; those arrangements ceded a greater portion of all premium to reinsurers
than do the post-acquisition reinsurance arrangements.
Premiums ceded for the third quarter of 2007 were reduced by $1.9 million due to the
commutation of certain reinsurance agreements. Premiums ceded were increased in the second quarter
of 2007 by approximately $2.6 million to reflect the impact of increases in our projection of ceded
losses for prior year agreements. Because there are no similar items in 2008, we excluded these
amounts in calculating the 2007 reinsurance expense ratios given in the above paragraph. When these
items are included, the 2007 reinsurance expense ratios are 7.9% for the three months and 9.2% for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
35
Net Investment Income, Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses); Equity in Earnings (Loss)
of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
($ in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
39,845 |
|
|
$ |
41,075 |
|
|
$ |
(1,230 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
%) |
|
$ |
122,218 |
|
|
$ |
128,194 |
|
|
$ |
(5,976 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
%) |
Net investment income is primarily derived from the income earned by our fixed maturity
securities and also includes income from short-term, trading portfolio and cash equivalent
investments, dividend income from equity securities, earnings from other investments and increases
in the cash surrender value of business owned executive life insurance contracts. Investment fees
and expenses are deducted from investment income.
Net investment income by investment category is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
$ |
37,513 |
|
|
$ |
36,970 |
|
|
$ |
115,378 |
|
|
$ |
111,149 |
|
Equities |
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
4,070 |
|
|
|
5,544 |
|
|
|
11,779 |
|
Other invested assets |
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
966 |
|
|
|
2,260 |
|
|
|
7,106 |
|
Business owned life insurance |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
1,481 |
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
Investment expenses |
|
|
(1,131 |
) |
|
|
(1,117 |
) |
|
|
(3,482 |
) |
|
|
(3,320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
39,845 |
|
|
$ |
41,075 |
|
|
$ |
122,218 |
|
|
$ |
128,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in net investment income for both the three- and the nine-month periods results
primarily from lower earnings on short-term investments due to a decline in market interest rates
(on average of 275 basis points) on such investments, and other invested assets for
the nine-month period, offset to an extent by higher earnings related to fixed maturity securities
and equities. Due to the instability of credit markets in 2008, we have held additional funds in
our short-term portfolio, a practice that may continue into 2009.
The increase in income from our investment in fixed maturities for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007 primarily reflects improved yields. On a
year-to-date basis, the increase in income from our investment in fixed maturities is attributable
to both improved yields and higher average invested funds. During 2008 the average outstanding
balance of our fixed maturities has increased on a year-to-date basis, but remained relatively flat
during the third quarter. Market interest rates during 2007 and 2008 allowed us to consistently
invest new and matured funds at rates that exceed the average held in our portfolio, which improved
our yields in 2008 as compared to 2007. Average yields for our available-for-sale fixed maturity
securities during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average income yield |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
Average tax equivalent income yield |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
Income from other invested assets is principally derived from private investment funds
accounted for on a cost basis. Because we recognize the income related to these funds as it is
distributed to us, our income from these holdings can vary significantly from period to period. In
particular, the company has an investment in a distressed debt fund that has reduced its quarterly
distributions given the turmoil in the debt markets.
36
Equity in Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of
unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
$ |
(1,967 |
) |
|
$ |
(589 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,378 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,916 |
) |
|
$ |
1,241 |
|
|
$ |
(5,157 |
) |
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated subsidiaries is derived from our ownership
interests in three private investment funds accounted for on the equity method. The performance of
the three funds reflects the decline and volatility of equity and credit markets in 2008, and we
experienced negative returns from our interest in a fund of high-yield asset backed securities and
our interest in a long/short equity fund during both the quarter and year-to-date periods. The
third fund is an early phase private equity fund of funds that is still incurring the costs
associated with its startup phase.
Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses)
The components of net realized investment gains (losses) are shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net gains (losses) from sales |
|
$ |
(3,100 |
) |
|
$ |
921 |
|
|
$ |
(2,954 |
) |
|
$ |
2,395 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairment (losses) |
|
|
(29,862 |
) |
|
|
(428 |
) |
|
|
(36,169 |
) |
|
|
(4,602 |
) |
Trading portfolio gains (losses) |
|
|
(1,274 |
) |
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
(1,888 |
) |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) |
|
$ |
(34,236 |
) |
|
$ |
1,321 |
|
|
$ |
(41,011 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
During the third quarter of 2008 we recognized other-than-temporary impairment losses of $29.9
million, which included $788,000 related to asset backed bonds, $19.6 million related to corporate
bonds of which $18.9 million were Lehman Brothers bonds, and $9.5 million related to our equity
holdings in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. During the first and second quarters of 2008 we recognized
other-than-temporary impairment losses of $6.3 million, which included $5.1 million related to
asset backed bonds, $513,000 related to corporate bonds and $353,000 related to a passive
investment in a private investment fund, and $300,000 related to our equity holdings.
In the third quarter of 2007 we recognized other-than-temporary impairment losses related to
certain fixed maturity securities and a passive investment that we hold in a non-public investment
pool. We also recognized other-than-temporary impairment losses in the first quarter of 2007
related to certain high yield asset backed bonds, particularly those with subprime loan exposures.
Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
The determination of calendar year losses involves the actuarial evaluation of incurred losses
for the current accident year and the actuarial re-evaluation of incurred losses for prior accident
years, including an evaluation of the reserve amounts required for losses in excess of policy
limits.
Accident year refers to the accounting period in which the insured event becomes a liability
of the insurer. For occurrence policies the insured event becomes a liability when the event takes
place; for claims-made policies, which represent the majority of the Companys business, the
insured event generally becomes a liability when the event is first reported to the insurer. We
believe that measuring losses on an accident year basis is the most indicative measure of the
underlying profitability of the premiums earned in that period since it associates policy premiums
earned with the estimate of the losses incurred related to those policy premiums.
37
The following table summarizes calendar year net losses and net loss ratios for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 by separating losses between the current accident
year and all prior accident years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Losses |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year |
|
$ |
95.2 |
|
|
$ |
113.1 |
|
|
$ |
(17.9 |
) |
|
$ |
293.9 |
|
|
$ |
346.5 |
|
|
$ |
(52.6 |
) |
Prior accident years |
|
|
(30.0 |
) |
|
|
(25.0 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
(81.3 |
) |
|
|
(60.6 |
) |
|
|
(20.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar year |
|
$ |
65.2 |
|
|
$ |
88.1 |
|
|
$ |
(22.9 |
) |
|
$ |
212.6 |
|
|
$ |
285.9 |
|
|
$ |
(73.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss Ratios* |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year |
|
|
83.9 |
% |
|
|
83.5 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
84.0 |
% |
|
|
85.5 |
% |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
Prior accident years |
|
|
(26.4 |
%) |
|
|
(18.5 |
%) |
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
(23.2 |
%) |
|
|
(15.0 |
%) |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar year |
|
|
57.5 |
% |
|
|
65.0 |
% |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
60.8 |
% |
|
|
70.5 |
% |
|
|
(9.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Net losses as specified divided by net premiums earned. |
Our current accident year loss ratio increased slightly for the three months and decreased for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods in 2007. During the
second quarter of 2007 the Company increased its current accident year loss reserves relating to
excess of policy limit losses, which increased the 2007 current accident year loss ratio by 1.2
percentage points for the year-to-date periods. Excluding this item, the current accident year loss
ratios vary only as a result of the mix of insured risks, and are comparable for both the quarter
and year-to-date periods.
Based upon claims data, we have reduced our expectation of claims severity within our retained
layers of coverage. As a result, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 we
recognized favorable net loss development of $30.0 million and $81.3 million, respectively,
generally related to our previously established (prior accident year) reserves. In particular, we
have observed claims severity below our initial expectations, within the first $1 million of
coverage, for the 2004 through 2007 accident years. Given both the long tailed nature of our
business and the past volatility of claims, we are generally cautious in recognizing the impact of
the underlying trends that lead to the recognition of favorable net loss development. As we
conclude that sufficient data with respect to these trends exists to credibly impact our actuarial
analysis we take appropriate actions. In the case of the claims severity trends for 2004-2007, we
believe it is appropriate to recognize the impact of these trends in our actuarial evaluation of
prior period loss estimates while also remaining cautious about the past volatility of claims
severity. Favorable net loss development for the year-to-date period also includes $3.7 million
recognized in the second quarter of 2008 related to prior year reinsurance contracts that were
commuted during the period.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 we recognized favorable net loss
development of $25.0 million and $60.6 million, respectively, related to our previously established
(prior accident year) reserves, primarily to reflect reductions in our estimates of claim severity,
within our retained layer of risk, for the 2003 through 2005 accident years.
Assumptions used in establishing our reserve are regularly reviewed and updated by management
as new data becomes available. Any adjustments necessary are reflected in then current operations.
Due to the size of our reserve, even a small percentage adjustment to the assumptions can have a
material effect on our results of operations for the period in which the change is made.
38
Underwriting, Acquisition and Insurance Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
($ in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting,
acquisition and
insurance expenses |
|
$ |
24,527 |
|
|
$ |
27,439 |
|
|
$ |
(2,912 |
) |
|
|
(10.6 |
%) |
|
$ |
75,927 |
|
|
$ |
79,913 |
|
|
$ |
(3,986 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting expense ratio |
|
|
21.6 |
% |
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
% |
|
|
19.7 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
|
The increase in the underwriting expense ratio (expense ratio) for both the three- and
nine-month periods is primarily the result of the decline in net premiums earned. The fixed costs associated
with our insurance operations were only modestly higher, while underwriting and acquisition
expenses were down in proportion to the decline in net earned premium.
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses include share-based compensation expense of
approximately $1.8 million for the three months and $6.4 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, as compared to $2.6 million and $6.4 million for the same periods in 2007,
respectively. As compared to 2007, expense for 2008 reflects additional expense related to
performance and option awards given to employees in 2008 but also reflects a decrease of $1.8
million related to option awards given to our new CEO and fully expensed in the third quarter of
2007. Awards to retirement eligible employees are fully expensed when granted (generally in the
first quarter) and were approximately $680,000 and $1.2 million of share-based compensation expense
for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
In certain states we are permitted to recoup previous guaranty fund assessments through
surcharges collected from our insureds. In both 2008 and 2007, the amounts recouped from our
insureds primarily relate to assessments previously paid to the Florida Insurance Guaranty
Association, Inc. Net guaranty fund assessments (recoupments) totaled ($356,000) and ($995,000) for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $1.0 million and $890,000 for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. The amounts recouped through
surcharges collected from our insureds approximated $265,000 and $913,000 for the three and nine
moths ended September 30, 2008, and $223,000 and $393,000 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, respectively.
39
Interest Expense
The conversion of our Convertible Debentures in July 2008 (see Note 7) and the redemption of
our 2032 Subordinated Debentures in December 2007 decreased interest expense during the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the same periods in 2007. Also, the average
interest rate of our 2034 Subordinated Debentures (which is based on three-month LIBOR) was
approximately 300 and 200 basis points lower for the three- and nine-month periods of 2008,
respectively, which further reduced interest expense. The three-month LIBOR rate has fluctuated in
September and October of 2008, ranging from a low of 2.85% to a high of 4.8%. Our next reset date
is mid-November 2008.
Interest expense by debt obligation is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Debentures |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,141 |
|
|
$ |
(1,141 |
) |
|
$ |
2,283 |
|
|
$ |
3,424 |
|
|
$ |
(1,141 |
) |
2032 Subordinated Debentures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
(1,189 |
) |
2034 Subordinated Debentures |
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
2,710 |
|
|
|
3,476 |
|
|
|
(766 |
) |
Surplus Notes |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,141 |
|
|
$ |
3,006 |
|
|
$ |
(1,865 |
) |
|
$ |
5,855 |
|
|
$ |
8,950 |
|
|
$ |
(3,095 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes
Our effective tax rate for each period is significantly lower than the 35% statutory rate
because a considerable portion of our net investment income is tax-exempt. The effect of tax-exempt
income on our effective tax rate is shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory rate |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
Tax-exempt income |
|
|
(15.6 |
%) |
|
|
(6.7 |
%) |
|
|
(9.6 |
%) |
|
|
(7.1 |
%) |
Other |
|
|
(1.2 |
%) |
|
|
(0.1 |
%) |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
18.2 |
% |
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
25.6 |
% |
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
The effect of tax-exempt income increased in the third quarter of 2008 as compared to third
quarter of 2007 because income before taxes is $32.9 million less in 2008 than in 2007 while
tax-exempt income remained level. Consequently, tax-exempt income represents a higher portion of
pre-tax income for 2008 (45%) as compared to 2007 (19%).
40
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We believe that we are principally exposed to three types of market risk related to our
investment operations. These risks are interest rate risk, credit risk and equity price risk.
Interest Rate Risk
Our fixed maturities portfolio is exposed to interest rate risk. Fluctuations in interest
rates have a direct impact on the market valuation of these securities. As interest rates rise,
market values of fixed income portfolios fall and vice versa. Certain of the securities are held in
an unrealized loss position; we have the current ability and intent to hold such securities until
recovery of book value or maturity.
The following table summarizes estimated changes in the fair value of our available-for-sale
and trading fixed maturity securities for specific hypothetical changes in interest rates as of
September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except duration) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
Change in |
|
Effective |
|
Portfolio |
|
Effective |
Interest Rates |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Duration |
|
Value |
|
Duration |
|
200 basis point rise |
|
$ |
2,768 |
|
|
$ |
(273 |
) |
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
$ |
2,953 |
|
|
|
4.62 |
|
100 basis point rise |
|
$ |
2,900 |
|
|
$ |
(141 |
) |
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
$ |
3,095 |
|
|
|
4.52 |
|
Current rate * |
|
$ |
3,041 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
4.42 |
|
|
$ |
3,237 |
|
|
|
4.13 |
|
100 basis point decline |
|
$ |
3,180 |
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
|
4.17 |
|
|
$ |
3,366 |
|
|
|
3.67 |
|
200 basis point decline |
|
$ |
3,309 |
|
|
$ |
268 |
|
|
|
4.20 |
|
|
$ |
3,486 |
|
|
|
3.48 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Current rates are as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. |
At September 30, 2008, the fair value of our investment in preferred stocks was $2.9 million,
including net unrealized losses of $1.6 million. Preferred stocks traditionally have been primarily
subject to interest rate risk because they bear a fixed rate of return, but may also be subject to
credit and equity price risk. The investments in the above table do not include preferred stocks.
Computations of prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on
numerous assumptions, including the maintenance of the existing level and composition of fixed
income security assets, and should not be relied on as indicative of future results.
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the computation of
the fair value of fixed rate instruments. Actual values may differ from those projections presented
should market conditions vary from assumptions used in the calculation of the fair value of
individual securities, including non-parallel shifts in the term structure of interest rates and
changing individual issuer credit spreads.
ProAssurances cash and short-term investment portfolio at September 30, 2008 was on a cost
basis which approximated its fair value. This portfolio lacks significant interest rate sensitivity
due to its short duration.
Credit Risk
We have exposure to credit risk primarily as a holder of fixed income securities. We control
this exposure by emphasizing investment grade credit quality in the fixed income securities we
purchase.
As of September 30, 2008, 97.6% of our fixed maturity securities are rated investment grade as
determined by Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSROs), (e.g. Moodys,
Standard & Poors and Fitch). We believe that this concentration in investment grade securities
reduces our exposure to credit risk on our fixed income investments to an acceptable level.
However, investment grade securities, in spite of their rating, can rapidly deteriorate and result
in significant losses. Ratings published by the NRSROs are one of the tools used to evaluate the
credit worthiness of our securities. The ratings reflect the subjective opinion of the rating
agencies as to the credit worthiness of the securities, and therefore, we may be subject to
additional credit exposure should the rating prove to be unreliable.
41
We
hold $1.36 billion of municipal bonds, approximately
$859 million (63%) of which are insured. Although these bonds
may have improved credit ratings based on or as a result of
guarantees of the debt obligations by a monoline insurer, we require
the bonds that we purchase to meet our credit criteria on a
stand-alone basis. As of September 30, 2008, our municipal bonds
have a weighted average rating of AA, even when the benefits of
insurance protection are excluded. Even though a number of the
monoline insurers have had their ratings downgraded, our municipal
bonds continue to be investment grade quality.
Equity Price Risk
At September 30, 2008 the fair value of our investment in common stocks was $20.8 million.
These securities are subject to equity price risk, which is defined as the potential for loss in
fair value due to a decline in equity prices. The weighted average Beta of this group of securities
is 0.97. Beta measures the price sensitivity of an equity security or group of equity securities to
a change in the broader equity market, in this case the S&P 500 Index. If the value of the S&P 500
Index increased by 10%, the fair value of these securities would be expected to increase by 9.7% to
$22.8 million. Conversely, a 10% decrease in the S&P 500 Index would imply a decrease of 9.7% in
the fair value of these securities to $18.8 million. The selected hypothetical changes of plus or
minus 10% do not reflect what could be considered the best or worst case scenarios and are used for
illustrative purposes only.
42
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company participated in
managements evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in SEC Rule
13a-15(e)) as of September 30, 2008. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
There have been no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, those controls during the
quarter.
43
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See Note 9 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
With the exception of the two additional risk factors listed below, there are no changes to
the Risk Factors in Part 1, Item 1A of the 2007 Form 10K.
The eventual effect that The 2008 Emergency Economic Stimulus Act will have on the U.S.
economy is unclear.
On October 3, 2008 the 2008 Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (EESA) was signed into law.
This legislation is intended to reestablish liquidity in U.S. financial markets and to promote
financial market stability. Among other provisions, EESA authorizes the Secretary of the U.S.
Treasury to establish the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) for the repurchase of up to $700
billion of mortgage backed securities and other troubled financial instruments from financial
institutions. The authority under EESA to purchase and insure assets
expires December 31, 2009 but
may, with certification of need to Congress, be extended to December 31, 2010. The effect that EESA
will have on the U.S. economy and ProAssurance, in particular, cannot yet be determined.
In a period of market illiquidity and instability, the fair values of our investments are more
difficult to assess and our assessments may prove to be greater or less than amounts received in
actual transactions.
We value investments that are traded in active markets using quoted market prices. For all
other investments, we estimate fair values based on broker dealer quotes and various other
valuation methodologies, which may require us to choose among various input assumptions and which
requires us to utilize judgment. When markets exhibit much volatility, there is more risk that we
may utilize a quoted market price, broker dealer quote, valuation technique or input assumption
that results in a fair value estimate that is either over or understated as compared to actual
amounts received upon disposition or maturity of the security.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Item (b) is inapplicable.
|
(a) |
|
On July 7, 2008, the Registrants 3.90% Convertible Senior Debentures due 2023 in
aggregate principal amount of $107,600,000 were converted into 2,572,029 shares of Registrants
common stock in accordance with the terms of the Debentures. The issuance
of the shares was reported in Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 9, 2008. |
|
|
(c) |
|
Information required by Item 703 of Regulation S-K |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
Value of Shares |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part |
|
that May Yet Be |
|
|
Number of |
|
Average |
|
of Publicly |
|
Purchased Under |
|
|
Shares |
|
Price Paid |
|
Announced Plans or |
|
the Plans or |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
per Share |
|
Programs |
|
Programs |
|
July 1 - 31, 2008 |
|
|
359,617 |
|
|
$ |
48.23 |
|
|
|
359,617 |
|
|
$ |
100,000,088 |
|
August 1 - 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
100,000,088 |
|
September 1 - 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
100,000,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
359,617 |
|
|
$ |
48.23 |
|
|
|
359,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer of ProAssurance as required under
SEC rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer of ProAssurance as required under
SEC rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer of ProAssurance as required under
SEC Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, as amended (18 U.S.C. 1350). |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer of ProAssurance as required under
SEC Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, as amended (18 U.S.C. 1350). |
45
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PROASSURANCE CORPORATION
November 4, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Edward L. Rand, Jr.
|
|
|
Edward L. Rand, Jr. |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Duly authorized officer and principal financial officer) |
|
46