FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OF 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-31225
, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
62-1812853 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification
No.) |
|
|
|
211 Commerce Street, Suite 300, Nashville, Tennessee
|
|
37201 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(615) 744-3700
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changes since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of April 24, 2009 there were 24,062,995 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share,
issued and outstanding.
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
Report on Form 10-Q
March 31, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (Pinnacle Financial) may from time to time make written or oral
statements, including statements contained in this report which may constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
The words expect, anticipate, likely, intend, plan, believe, seek, estimate and
similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, but other statements
not based on historical information may also be considered forward-looking. All forward-looking
statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other facts that may cause the actual results,
performance or achievements of Pinnacle Financial to differ materially from any results expressed
or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, without limitation, (i)
deterioration in the financial condition of borrowers resulting in significant increases in loan
losses and provisions for those losses, (ii) continuation of the historically low short-term
interest rate environment, (iii) the inability of Pinnacle Financial to continue to grow its loan
portfolio at historic rates in the Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin MSA and the Knoxville
MSA, (iv) rapid fluctuations or unanticipated changes in interest rates, (v) the development of any
new market other than Nashville or Knoxville, (vi) a merger or acquisition, (vii) any activity in
the capital markets that would cause Pinnacle Financial to conclude that there was impairment of
any asset including intangible assets, (ix) the deterioration in
carrying amounts of impaired assets and other real estate and (x) changes in state and Federal legislation,
regulations or policies applicable to Banks and other financial service providers, including
regulatory or legislative developments arising out of current unsettled conditions in the economy.
A more detailed description of these and other risks is contained in Pinnacle Financials most
recent annual report on Form 10-K. Many of such factors are beyond Pinnacle Financials ability to
control or predict, and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on such forward-looking
statements. Pinnacle Financial disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking
statements contained in this release, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise.
Page 1
Item 1. Part I. Financial Information
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and noninterest-bearing due from banks |
|
$ |
47,708,780 |
|
|
$ |
68,388,961 |
|
Interest-bearing due from banks |
|
|
82,793,738 |
|
|
|
8,869,680 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
22,789,662 |
|
|
|
12,994,114 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
153,292,180 |
|
|
|
90,252,755 |
|
|
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
857,932,392 |
|
|
|
839,229,428 |
|
Securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $10,740,109 and
$10,642,973 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) |
|
|
10,539,910 |
|
|
|
10,551,256 |
|
Mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
|
24,651,088 |
|
|
|
25,476,788 |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
3,473,959,457 |
|
|
|
3,354,907,269 |
|
Less allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(45,334,073 |
) |
|
|
(36,484,073 |
) |
|
|
|
Loans, net |
|
|
3,428,625,384 |
|
|
|
3,318,423,196 |
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
68,855,561 |
|
|
|
68,865,221 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
35,139,980 |
|
|
|
33,616,450 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
17,752,634 |
|
|
|
17,565,141 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
244,120,021 |
|
|
|
244,160,624 |
|
Core deposits and other intangible assets |
|
|
16,112,670 |
|
|
|
16,871,202 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
19,816,743 |
|
|
|
18,305,880 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
75,312,868 |
|
|
|
70,756,823 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,952,151,431 |
|
|
$ |
4,754,074,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing |
|
$ |
451,418,417 |
|
|
$ |
424,756,813 |
|
Interest-bearing |
|
|
380,384,416 |
|
|
|
375,992,912 |
|
Savings and money market accounts |
|
|
717,265,116 |
|
|
|
694,582,319 |
|
Time |
|
|
2,201,890,175 |
|
|
|
2,037,914,307 |
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
3,750,958,124 |
|
|
|
3,533,246,351 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
209,590,988 |
|
|
|
184,297,793 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings |
|
|
221,642,376 |
|
|
|
201,966,181 |
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
397,000 |
|
|
|
71,643,000 |
|
Subordinated debt |
|
|
97,476,000 |
|
|
|
97,476,000 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
9,327,196 |
|
|
|
8,326,264 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
31,113,517 |
|
|
|
29,820,779 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
4,320,505,201 |
|
|
|
4,126,776,368 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value; 10,000,000 shares
authorized; 95,000 shares issued and outstanding at March
31, 2009, and December 31, 2008 |
|
|
88,607,989 |
|
|
|
88,348,647 |
|
Common stock, par value $1.00; 90,000,000 shares authorized;
24,060,703 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2009
and 23,762,124 issued and outstanding at December
31, 2008 |
|
|
24,060,703 |
|
|
|
23,762,124 |
|
Common stock warrants |
|
|
6,696,804 |
|
|
|
6,696,804 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
418,216,850 |
|
|
|
417,040,974 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
85,380,063 |
|
|
|
84,380,447 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes |
|
|
8,683,821 |
|
|
|
7,069,400 |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
631,646,230 |
|
|
|
627,298,396 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
4,952,151,431 |
|
|
$ |
4,754,074,764 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 2
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
38,525,745 |
|
|
$ |
45,392,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
9,087,687 |
|
|
|
4,637,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
1,474,654 |
|
|
|
1,351,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and other |
|
|
430,240 |
|
|
|
780,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
49,518,326 |
|
|
|
52,161,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
17,733,785 |
|
|
|
21,085,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
360,787 |
|
|
|
832,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings |
|
|
2,723,502 |
|
|
|
2,884,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
20,818,074 |
|
|
|
24,802,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
28,700,252 |
|
|
|
27,359,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
13,609,535 |
|
|
|
1,591,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
15,090,717 |
|
|
|
25,767,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
2,476,951 |
|
|
|
2,573,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment services |
|
|
854,103 |
|
|
|
1,268,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance sales commissions |
|
|
1,305,209 |
|
|
|
1,063,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on loan sales, net |
|
|
1,287,772 |
|
|
|
656,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on investment sales, net |
|
|
4,346,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust fees |
|
|
657,708 |
|
|
|
505,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other noninterest income |
|
|
2,207,634 |
|
|
|
2,300,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
13,135,523 |
|
|
|
8,367,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
14,751,049 |
|
|
|
13,866,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and occupancy |
|
|
4,235,328 |
|
|
|
4,276,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed
real estate expense |
|
|
700,595 |
|
|
|
60,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing and other business development |
|
|
439,516 |
|
|
|
375,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
Postage and supplies |
|
|
830,138 |
|
|
|
648,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
758,533 |
|
|
|
766,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
Merger related expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,105,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other noninterest expense |
|
|
3,527,865 |
|
|
|
2,391,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
25,243,024 |
|
|
|
25,491,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
2,983,216 |
|
|
|
8,643,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
893,008 |
|
|
|
2,578,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,090,208 |
|
|
$ |
6,064,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
1,187,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion on preferred stock discount |
|
|
259,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
643,366 |
|
|
$ |
6,064,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share available to common
stockholders |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
23,510,994 |
|
|
|
22,331,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
24,814,408 |
|
|
|
23,484,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 3
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
Common Stock |
|
Stock |
|
Paid-in |
|
Retained |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Stockholders |
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Warrants |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,264,817 |
|
|
$ |
22,264,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
390,977,308 |
|
|
$ |
54,150,679 |
|
|
$ |
(782,510 |
) |
|
$ |
466,610,294 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle due to adoption
of EITF 06-4, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(598,699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(598,699 |
) |
Exercise of employee common stock
options, stock appreciation rights,
common stock warrants and related
tax benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,073 |
|
|
|
62,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
623,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
685,349 |
|
Issuance of restricted common
shares pursuant to 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan, net of forfeitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,373 |
|
|
|
140,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140,373 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense for restricted
shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,641 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,641 |
) |
Compensation expense for stock
options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514,582 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,064,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,064,790 |
|
Net
unrealized holding gains on
securities available-for-sale,
net of deferred tax benefit
of $2,404,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,914,758 |
|
|
|
3,914,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,979,548 |
|
|
|
|
Balances, March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,467,263 |
|
|
$ |
22,467,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
391,942,152 |
|
|
$ |
59,616,770 |
|
|
$ |
3,132,248 |
|
|
$ |
477,158,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
95,000 |
|
|
$ |
88,348,647 |
|
|
|
23,762,124 |
|
|
$ |
23,762,124 |
|
|
$ |
6,696,804 |
|
|
$ |
417,040,974 |
|
|
$ |
84,380,447 |
|
|
$ |
7,069,400 |
|
|
$ |
627,298,396 |
|
Exercise of employee common stock
options, stock appreciation rights,
common stock warrants and related
tax benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,485 |
|
|
|
50,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
620,616 |
|
Issuance of restricted common
shares, net of forfeitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,078 |
|
|
|
249,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(249,078 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted shares withheld for taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(984 |
) |
|
|
(984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,223 |
) |
Compensation expense for restricted
shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440,748 |
|
Compensation expense for stock
options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434,314 |
|
Accretion on preferred stock
dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
259,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(259,342 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(831,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(831,250 |
) |
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,090,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,090,208 |
|
Net
unrealized holding gains on
securities available-for-sale,
net of deferred tax benefit
of $1,006,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,614,421 |
|
|
|
1,614,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,704,629 |
|
|
|
|
Balances, March 31, 2009 |
|
|
95,000 |
|
|
$ |
88,607,989 |
|
|
|
24,060,703 |
|
|
$ |
24,060,703 |
|
|
$ |
6,696,804 |
|
|
$ |
418,216,850 |
|
|
$ |
85,380,063 |
|
|
$ |
8,683,821 |
|
|
$ |
631,646,230 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 4
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,090,208 |
|
|
$ |
6,064,790 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization/accretion of premium/discount on securities |
|
|
699,726 |
|
|
|
182,563 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,650,715 |
|
|
|
1,112,113 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
13,609,535 |
|
|
|
1,591,123 |
|
Gain on loan
sales |
|
|
(1,287,772 |
) |
|
|
(656,088 |
) |
Gain on
investment sales, net |
|
|
(4,346,146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
875,062 |
|
|
|
481,941 |
|
Deferred tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(3,749,584 |
) |
|
|
1,487,344 |
|
Losses on
foreclosed real estate and other investments |
|
|
390,390 |
|
|
|
44,262 |
|
Net gains on sale of premises |
|
|
(7,899 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock compensation |
|
|
(40,595 |
) |
|
|
(50,299 |
) |
Mortgage loans held for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans originated |
|
|
(191,052,542 |
) |
|
|
(61,526,765 |
) |
Loans sold |
|
|
192,931,675 |
|
|
|
59,757,305 |
|
Increase in other assets |
|
|
1,135,420 |
|
|
|
228,836 |
|
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities |
|
|
2,293,669 |
|
|
|
(257,260 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
16,191,862 |
|
|
|
8,459,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activities in securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
(267,868,777 |
) |
|
|
(57,529,865 |
) |
Sales |
|
|
201,221,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities, prepayments and calls |
|
|
45,514,061 |
|
|
|
65,224,367 |
|
Activities in securities held-to-maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities, prepayments and calls |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,750,000 |
|
Increase in loans, net |
|
|
(128,853,928 |
) |
|
|
(119,667,223 |
) |
Purchases of premises and equipment and software |
|
|
(1,679,977 |
) |
|
|
(2,603,806 |
) |
Other investments |
|
|
(1,603,900 |
) |
|
|
(1,486,800 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(144,579,098 |
) |
|
|
(100,313,327 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits |
|
|
217,854,751 |
|
|
|
42,735,290 |
|
Net increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
25,293,195 |
|
|
|
15,115,628 |
|
Net decrease in Federal funds purchased |
|
|
(71,246,000 |
) |
|
|
(39,668,000 |
) |
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances |
|
|
35,000,000 |
|
|
|
70,000,000 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(15,284,031 |
) |
|
|
(3,336,883 |
) |
Preferred dividends paid |
|
|
(831,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Exercise of common stock options and stock appreciation rights |
|
|
599,401 |
|
|
|
739,855 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock compensation |
|
|
40,595 |
|
|
|
50,299 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
191,426,661 |
|
|
|
85,636,189 |
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
63,039,425 |
|
|
|
(6,217,273 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
90,252,755 |
|
|
|
122,503,863 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
153,292,180 |
|
|
$ |
116,286,590 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 5
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Business Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (Pinnacle Financial) is a bank holding
company whose primary business is conducted by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Pinnacle National Bank
(Pinnacle National). Pinnacle National is a commercial bank headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee.
Pinnacle National provides a full range of banking services in its primary market areas of the
Nashville-Davidson-Rutherford-Franklin, Tennessee and Knoxville, Tennessee Metropolitan Statistical
Areas.
In addition to Pinnacle National, Pinnacle Financial, for the time period following its merger
with Mid-America Bancshares, Inc. (Mid-America) on November 30, 2007 through February 29, 2008,
conducted banking operations through the two banks formerly owned by Mid-America: PrimeTrust Bank
in Nashville, Tennessee and Bank of the South in Mt. Juliet, Tennessee.
Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have
been prepared in accordance with instructions to Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all
information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of
operations, and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. All
adjustments consisting of normally recurring accruals that, in the opinion of management, are
necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the
periods covered by the report have been included. The accompanying unaudited consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Pinnacle Financial consolidated
financial statements and related notes appearing in the 2008 Annual Report previously filed on Form
10-K.
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Pinnacle Financial and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries. PNFP Statutory Trust I, PNFP Statutory Trust II, PNFP Statutory Trust
III, PNFP Statutory Trust IV and Collateral Plus, LLC, are affiliates of Pinnacle Financial and are
included in these consolidated financial statements pursuant to the equity method of accounting.
Significant intercompany transactions and accounts are eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities
as of the balance sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly
susceptible to significant change in the near term include the determination of the allowance for
loan losses.
Cash Flow Information Supplemental cash flow information addressing certain cash payments
and noncash transactions for each of the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Cash Payments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
19,999,896 |
|
|
$ |
25,035,879 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged-off to the allowance for loan losses |
|
|
4,852,185 |
|
|
|
757,276 |
|
Loans
foreclosed upon with repossessions transferred to other real estate |
|
|
4,838,298 |
|
|
|
2,855,967 |
|
Net
unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities,
net of deferred tax benefit |
|
|
1,614,421 |
|
|
|
3,914,758 |
|
Income
Per Common Share Basic net income per share available to common stockholders (EPS)
is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average common
shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the dilution that could occur if
securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted. The difference
between basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding was attributable to common stock
options, common stock appreciation rights, warrants and restricted shares. The dilutive effect of
outstanding options, common stock appreciation rights, warrants and restricted shares is reflected
in diluted EPS by application of the treasury stock method.
As of March 31, 2009, there were 2,171,000 stock options and 11,000 stock appreciation rights
outstanding to purchase common shares. As of March 31, 2008, there were 2,457,000 stock options
and 14,000 stock appreciation rights outstanding to purchase common shares. Most of these options
and stock appreciation rights have exercise prices and compensation costs
Page 6
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
attributable to current services, which when considered in relation to the average market price of
Pinnacle Financials common stock, are considered dilutive and are considered in Pinnacle
Financials diluted income per share calculation for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008. There were common stock options of 1,015,000 and 481,000 outstanding as of March 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively, which were considered anti-dilutive and thus have not been considered in
the fully-diluted earnings per share calculations below. Additionally, as of March 31, 2009 and 2008, Pinnacle
Financial had outstanding warrants to purchase 345,000 and 395,000,
respectively, of common shares
which have been considered in the calculation of Pinnacle
Financials diluted earnings per share for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. At March 31, 2009, Pinnacle Financial had
outstanding warrants to purchase 534,910 shares of common stock associated with the U.S. Treasury
Capital Purchase Program (the CPP), which warrants were considered anti-dilutive and thus have
not been considered in the fully-diluted share calculations below.
The
following is a summary of the basic and diluted earnings per share calculations for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share calculation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
643,366 |
|
|
$ |
6,064,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
23,510,994 |
|
|
|
22,331,398 |
|
Basic net income per share available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share calculation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
643,366 |
|
|
$ |
6,064,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
23,510,994 |
|
|
|
22,331,398 |
|
Dilutive shares contingently issuable |
|
|
1,303,414 |
|
|
|
1,153,356 |
|
|
|
|
Average diluted common shares outstanding |
|
|
24,814,408 |
|
|
|
23,484,754 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements Pinnacle Financial acquired Cavalry Banking, Inc.
in March of 2006. Certain executives and directors of Cavalry Banking, Inc. were participants in a
deferred compensation arrangement which included split-dollar life insurance arrangements. In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) ratified the consensuses reached by the Emerging
Issues Task Force (EITF) on Issue No. 06-4 (EITF
06-4) Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement
Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements. The EITF concluded that deferred compensation or
postretirement benefit aspects of an endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangement should be
recognized as a liability by the employer and the obligation is not effectively settled by the
purchase of a life insurance policy. The effective date was for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2007. On January 1, 2008, Pinnacle Financial accounted for this EITF as a change in accounting
principle and recorded a liability of $985,000 along with a
corresponding adjustment of $598,699 to
beginning retained earnings, net of tax.
Share-Based
Payment In December 2007, the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) 110, Share-Based Payment. SAB
110 allows eligible public companies to continue to use a simplified method for estimating the
expense of stock options if their own historical experience is not sufficient to provide a
reasonable basis. Under SAB 107, Share-Based Payment, the simplified method was scheduled to
expire for all grants made after December 31, 2007. The SAB describes disclosures that should be
provided if a company is using the simplified method for all or a portion of its stock option
grants beyond December 31, 2007. The provisions of this bulletin were effective on January 1,
2008. Pinnacle Financial continues to use the simplified method allowed by SAB 110 for determining
the expected term component for share options granted during 2009.
Fair Value Measurement In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 157 (SFAS 157), Fair
Value Measurements. SFAS 157, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. SFAS 157 applies only to fair-value measurements that are already required or
permitted by other accounting standards and is expected to increase the consistency of those
measurements. The
Page 7
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
definition of fair value focuses on the exit price, i.e., the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date, not the entry price, i.e., the price that would be paid to acquire the
asset or received to assume the liability at the measurement date. The statement emphasizes that
fair value is a market-based measurement; not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, the fair
value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use
in pricing the asset or liability. The effective date for SFAS No. 157 was for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Pinnacle
Financial adopted SFAS 157 effective January 1, 2008 for financial assets and liabilities
and effective January 1, 2009 for non financial assets and liabilities pursuant to Financial
Statement Position (FSP) FAS 157-2.
In February of 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 (SFAS 159), The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which gives entities the option to measure eligible
financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value, on an instrument by instrument basis,
that are otherwise not permitted to be accounted for at fair value under other accounting
standards. The election to use the fair value option is available when an entity first recognizes a
financial asset or financial liability. Subsequent changes in fair value must be recorded in
earnings. This statement was effective as of January 1, 2008; however, it had no impact on the
consolidated financial statements of Pinnacle Financial because Pinnacle Financial did not elect
the fair value option for any financial instrument not presently being accounted for at fair value.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial
Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active. This FSP clarifies the application of SFAS No.
157 in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in
determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not
active. This FSP was effective for Pinnacle Financial upon issuance, including prior periods for
which financial statements have not been issued; and, therefore was effective for Pinnacle
Financials financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008. Adoption of FSP
No. FAS 157-3 did not have a significant impact on Pinnacle Financials financial position or
results of operations.
Pinnacle Financial has an established process for determining fair values. Fair value is based
upon quoted market prices, where available. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair
value is based upon internally developed models or processes that use primarily market-based or
independently-sourced market data, including interest rate yield curves, option volatilities and
third party information. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are
recorded at fair value. Furthermore, while Pinnacle Financial believes its valuation methods are
appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies, or
assumptions, to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a
different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.
Valuation Hierarchy
SFAS 157 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value
measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of
an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for
identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets
and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or
liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial
instrument. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the
fair value measurement. |
A financial instruments categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Following is a
description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such assets and liabilities pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
Page 8
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Assets
Securities Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified
within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities include highly liquid government
securities and certain other products. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values
are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or
discounted cash flows and are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. In certain
cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the valuation,
securities are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
Mortgage loans held-for-sale Mortgage loans held-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost
or fair value and are classified within level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. The inputs for
valuation of these assets are based on the anticipated sales price of these loans as the loans are
usually sold within a few weeks of their origination.
Impaired loans A loan is considered to be impaired when it is probable Pinnacle Financial
will be unable to collect all principal and interest payments due in accordance with the
contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of
expected payments using the loans original effective rate as the discount rate, the loans
observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
If the recorded investment in the impaired loan exceeds the measure of fair value, a valuation
allowance may be established as a component of the allowance for loan losses. Impaired loans are
classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.
Other investments Included in other investments are investments in certain nonpublic
private equity funds. The valuation of nonpublic private equity investments requires significant
management judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity and the
long-term nature of such assets. These investments are valued initially based upon transaction
price. The carrying values of other investments are adjusted either upwards or downwards from the
transaction price to reflect expected exit values as evidenced by financing and sale transactions
with third parties, or when determination of a valuation adjustment is confirmed through ongoing
reviews by senior investment managers. A variety of factors are reviewed and monitored to assess
positive and negative changes in valuation including, but not limited to, current operating
performance and future expectations of the particular investment, industry valuations of comparable
public companies, changes in market outlook and the third-party financing environment over time. In
determining valuation adjustments resulting from the investment review process, emphasis is placed
on current company performance and market conditions. These investments are included in Level 3 of
the valuation hierarchy.
Other real estate Other real estate, consisting of properties obtained through
foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans, is reported at the lower of cost or fair value, determined
on the basis of current appraisals, comparable sales, and other estimates of value obtained
principally from independent sources, adjusted for estimated selling costs. At the time of
foreclosure, any excess of the loan balance over the fair value of the real estate held as
collateral is treated as a charge against the allowance for loan losses. Gains or losses on sale
and any subsequent adjustments to the value are recorded as a component of foreclosed real estate
expense.
Other assets Included in other assets are certain assets carried at fair value, including
the cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance policies and interest rate swap agreements.
The carrying amount of the cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance is based on
information received from the insurance carriers indicating the financial performance of the
policies and the amount Pinnacle Financial would receive should the policies be surrendered.
Pinnacle Financial reflects these assets within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. The carrying
amount of interest rate swap agreements is based on information obtained from a third party bank.
Pinnacle Financial reflects these assets within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
Liabilities
Other liabilities Pinnacle Financial has certain liabilities carried at fair value
including certain interest rate swap agreements. The fair value of these liabilities is based on
information obtained from a third party bank and is reflected within Level 2 of the valuation
hierarchy.
The following table presents the financial instruments carried at fair value as of March 31,
2009, by caption on the consolidated balance sheets and by SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy (as
described above) (dollars in thousands):
Page 9
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal models |
|
Internal models |
|
|
Total carrying |
|
Quoted market |
|
with significant |
|
with significant |
|
|
value in the |
|
prices in an active |
|
observable market |
|
unobservable market |
|
|
consolidated |
|
market |
|
parameters |
|
parameters |
|
|
balance sheet |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
857,932 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
853,085 |
|
|
$ |
4,847 |
|
Mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
|
24,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments |
|
|
1,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,557 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
64,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,163 |
|
|
|
47,343 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
948,647 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
894,899 |
|
|
$ |
53,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
17,327 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,327 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
17,327 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,327 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal models |
|
Internal models |
|
|
Total carrying |
|
Quoted market |
|
with significant |
|
with significant |
|
|
value in the |
|
prices in an active |
|
observable market |
|
unobservable market |
|
|
consolidated |
|
market |
|
parameters |
|
parameters |
|
|
balance sheet |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
Other real estate |
|
$ |
19,817 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,817 |
|
Impaired loans |
|
|
55,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,413 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
75,230 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
75,230 |
|
|
|
|
Changes in level 3 fair value measurements
The table below includes a rollforward of the balance sheet amounts for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 (including the change in fair value) for financial instruments classified by
Pinnacle Financial within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at
fair value on a recurring basis. When a determination is made to classify a financial instrument
within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, the determination is based upon the significance of the
unobservable factors to the overall fair value measurement. However, since level 3 financial
instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable or level 3 components, observable
components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources),
the gains and losses in the table below include changes in fair value due in part to observable
factors that are part of the valuation methodology.
Page 10
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2009 (in thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
Fair value, January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
85,464 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total realized and unrealized gains
included in income |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and/or out of level 3 |
|
|
(31,921 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value, March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
53,747 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrealized gains included in income related to
financial assets and liabilities still on the consolidated
balance sheet at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 2. Participation in U.S. Treasury Capital Purchase Program and Private Placement of Common
Stock
On December 12, 2008, Pinnacle Financial issued 95,000 shares of preferred stock to the U.S.
Treasury for $95 million pursuant to the CPP. Additionally, Pinnacle Financial issued warrants to
purchase 534,910 shares of common stock to the U.S. Treasury as a condition to its participation
in the CPP. The warrants have an exercise price of $26.64 each and are immediately exercisable and
expire 10 years from the date of issuance. Proceeds from this sale of the preferred stock are
expected to be used for general corporate purposes, including supporting the continued, anticipated
growth of Pinnacle National. The CPP preferred stock is non-voting, other than having class voting
rights on certain matters, and pays cumulative dividends quarterly at a rate of 5% per annum for
the first five years and 9% thereafter. Pinnacle Financial can redeem the preferred shares issued
to the U.S. Treasury under the CPP at any time subject to a requirement that it must consult with
its primary federal regulator before redemption.
Management used a cost of capital model to calculate the fair value of the Series A preferred
stock issued to the U.S. Treasury in connection with the CPP. The cost of capital model involved
estimating a reasonable return for a similar $95 million capital investment in Pinnacle Financial.
The model incorporated a risk free rate (Long Term U.S. Treasury bond rate) added to a market
premium for Pinnacle Financials common stock. For the market premium for Pinnacle Financials
common stock, Pinnacle Financial multiplied its beta factor as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select
Markets website as of December 11, 2008 by 5% (the result of which was the estimated market risk
premium). Additionally, due to the relatively small size of the offering, Pinnacle Financial added
an additional risk premium of 2.3% to the total. The result was a cost of capital calculation of
8.3%. Pinnacle Financial believed 8.3% was a reasonable after-tax return to an investor who might
be willing to acquire a $95 million interest in Pinnacle Financial. Pinnacle Financial then
forecasted the cash outflows of the preferred stock issuance at the 5% dividend rate assuming a
terminal payment of $95 million five years from issuance prior to the dividend payment rates
increase from 5% to 9%. Using a discounted cash flow model with a discount rate of 8.3%, the
result was a fair value for the Series A preferred stock of $83.7 million.
The fair value of the common stock warrants issued in
tandem with the Series A preferred stock was determined to be approximately $6.3 million. The fair
value of the Series A preferred stock and the fair value of the common stock warrants were summed
and the initial carrying amounts for the Series A preferred stock and the common stock warrants
were calculated based on an allocation of the two fair value components. The aggregate fair value
result for both the Series A preferred stock and the common stock warrants was calculated to be
$90.0 million, with 7% of this aggregate total allocated to the warrants and 93% allocated to the
Preferred Stock. As a result of this allocation, the $95 million issuance resulted in the warrants
having a value of $6.7 million and the Series A preferred
stock having an initial value of $88.3
million.
Management calculated the accretion amount of the Series A preferred stock discount using the
effective interest method which resulted in an effective rate of 6.51%. That is, to accrete the
$6.7 million discount on the Series A preferred stock over the next five years on an effective
interest method resulted in a calculation of 6.51% for the five year period. The $6.7 million will
be accreted as a reduction in net income available for common shareholders over the next five years
at approximately $1.1 million to $1.3 million per year. The
fair value of the common stock warrants as of December 12, 2008 was estimated using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions:
Page 11
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
2.64 |
% |
Expected life of warrants |
|
10 years |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
30.3 |
% |
Weighted average fair value |
|
$ |
11.86 |
|
Pinnacle Financials computation of expected volatility is based on weekly historical
volatility since September of 2002. The risk free interest rate of
the warrants were based on the
closing market bid for U.S. Treasury securities corresponding to the expected life of the common
stock warrants in effect at the time of grant.
Note 3. Securities
The amortized cost and fair value of securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
|
201,162,936 |
|
|
|
2,603,051 |
|
|
|
293,904 |
|
|
|
203,472,083 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
493,166,631 |
|
|
|
11,752,741 |
|
|
|
50,366 |
|
|
|
504,869,006 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
144,528,076 |
|
|
|
2,550,317 |
|
|
|
2,373,407 |
|
|
|
144,704,986 |
|
Corporate notes and other |
|
|
5,143,675 |
|
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
|
259,620 |
|
|
|
4,886,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
844,001,318 |
|
|
$ |
16,908,371 |
|
|
$ |
2,977,297 |
|
|
$ |
857,932,392 |
|
|
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
$ |
1,998,051 |
|
|
$ |
21,449 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,019,500 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
8,541,859 |
|
|
|
251,822 |
|
|
|
73,072 |
|
|
|
8,720,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,539,910 |
|
|
$ |
273,271 |
|
|
$ |
73,072 |
|
|
$ |
10,740,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. Government agency securities |
|
|
62,861,379 |
|
|
|
1,561,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,423,353 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
626,414,161 |
|
|
|
12,140,209 |
|
|
|
197,086 |
|
|
|
638,357,284 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
136,727,876 |
|
|
|
1,454,803 |
|
|
|
3,357,443 |
|
|
|
134,825,236 |
|
Corporate notes |
|
|
1,907,722 |
|
|
|
3,785 |
|
|
|
287,952 |
|
|
|
1,623,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
827,911,138 |
|
|
$ |
15,160,771 |
|
|
$ |
3,842,481 |
|
|
$ |
839,229,428 |
|
|
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
$ |
1,997,967 |
|
|
$ |
5,593 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,003,560 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
8,553,289 |
|
|
|
172,589 |
|
|
|
86,465 |
|
|
|
8,639,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,551,256 |
|
|
$ |
178,182 |
|
|
$ |
86,465 |
|
|
$ |
10,642,973 |
|
|
|
|
During
the three months ended March 31, 2009, Pinnacle Financial
realized approximately $5.92 million in net gains and
$1.57 million in net losses from the sale of $201 million
of available-for-sale securities. At March 31, 2009, approximately $744.2 million of Pinnacle Financials investment portfolio
was pledged to secure public funds and other deposits and securities sold under agreements to
repurchase.
Page 12
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, included in securities were the following investments
with unrealized losses. The information below classifies these investments according to the term
of the unrealized losses of less than twelve months or twelve months or longer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments with an Unrealized |
|
Investments with an Unrealized |
|
Total Investments with an |
|
|
Loss of less than 12 months |
|
Loss of 12 months or longer |
|
Unrealized Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
|
|
At March 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
$ |
11,985,000 |
|
|
$ |
293,904 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,985,000 |
|
|
$ |
293,904 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
2,828,868 |
|
|
|
49,454 |
|
|
|
46,316 |
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
2,875,184 |
|
|
|
50,365 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
46,413,633 |
|
|
|
2,075,645 |
|
|
|
11,269,243 |
|
|
|
370,835 |
|
|
|
57,682,876 |
|
|
|
2,446,480 |
|
Corporate notes |
|
|
3,120,077 |
|
|
|
259,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,120,077 |
|
|
|
259,620 |
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily-impaired securities |
|
$ |
64,347,578 |
|
|
$ |
2,678,623 |
|
|
$ |
11,315,559 |
|
|
$ |
371,746 |
|
|
$ |
75,663,137 |
|
|
$ |
3,050,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
29,622,695 |
|
|
|
119,315 |
|
|
|
2,520,127 |
|
|
|
77,771 |
|
|
|
32,142,822 |
|
|
|
197,086 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
28,560,915 |
|
|
|
1,095,573 |
|
|
|
32,466,087 |
|
|
|
2,348,335 |
|
|
|
61,027,002 |
|
|
|
3,443,908 |
|
Corporate notes |
|
|
242,520 |
|
|
|
157,480 |
|
|
|
859,475 |
|
|
|
130,472 |
|
|
|
1,101,995 |
|
|
|
287,952 |
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily-impaired securities |
|
$ |
58,426,130 |
|
|
$ |
1,372,368 |
|
|
$ |
35,845,689 |
|
|
$ |
2,556,578 |
|
|
$ |
94,271,819 |
|
|
$ |
3,928,946 |
|
|
|
|
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on at least a quarterly
basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration
is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost,
(2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability
of Pinnacle Financial to retain its investment in the issue for a period of time sufficient to
allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. Because the declines in fair value noted above
were primarily attributable to increases in interest rates rather than credit quality and because
Pinnacle Financial has the ability and intent to hold all of these investments until a market price
recovery or maturity, the impairment of these investments is not deemed to be other-than-temporary.
Note 4. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
The composition of loans at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is summarized in the table
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, |
|
At December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Commercial real estate Mortgage |
|
$ |
1,010,308,516 |
|
|
$ |
963,530,444 |
|
Consumer real estate Mortgage |
|
|
710,266,617 |
|
|
|
675,605,596 |
|
Construction and land development |
|
|
674,397,576 |
|
|
|
658,798,934 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
968,126,507 |
|
|
|
966,562,521 |
|
Consumer and other |
|
|
110,860,241 |
|
|
|
90,409,774 |
|
|
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
3,473,959,457 |
|
|
|
3,354,907,269 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(45,334,073 |
) |
|
|
(36,484,073 |
) |
|
|
|
Loans, net |
|
$ |
3,428,625,384 |
|
|
$ |
3,318,423,196 |
|
|
|
|
Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and for the
year ended December 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
36,484,073 |
|
|
$ |
28,470,207 |
|
Charged-off loans |
|
|
(4,852,185 |
) |
|
|
(5,133,274 |
) |
Recovery of previously charged-off loans |
|
|
92,650 |
|
|
|
1,933,597 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
13,609,535 |
|
|
|
11,213,543 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
45,334,073 |
|
|
$ |
36,484,073 |
|
|
|
|
Page 13
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
At
March 31, 2009, Pinnacle Financial had certain impaired loans of
$55,413,000 of which $33,863,000 were on
nonaccruing interest status. At December 31, 2008, Pinnacle
Financial had certain impaired loans of $10,860,000 of which all were
on nonaccruing interest status. In each case,
at the date such loans were placed on nonaccrual status, Pinnacle Financial reversed all previously
accrued interest income against current year earnings. Had nonaccruing loans been on accruing
status, interest income would have been higher by $690,000 and $482,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, respectively.
Potential
problem loans, which are not included in nonperforming assets,
amounted to approximately $88.9 million at March 31, 2009
compared to $27.8 million at December 31, 2008. Potential
problem loans represent those loans with a well-defined weakness and
where information about possible credit problems of borrowers has
caused management to have serious doubts about the borrowers
ability to comply with present repayment terms. This definition is
believed to be substantially consistent with the standards
established by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency,
Pinnacle Nationals primary regulator, for loans classified as
substandard, excluding the impact of nonperforming loans. The large
increase in potential problem loans was caused by the downgrade of
additional residential construction and development loans and one
$21.55 million loan to a one-bank holding company.
At March 31, 2009, Pinnacle Financial had granted loans and other extensions of credit
amounting to approximately $36,000,000 to directors, executive officers, and their related
entities, of which $28,570,000 had been drawn upon. During the three months ended March 31, 2009,
$1,826,000 of loan and other commitment increases and $876,000 of principal and other reductions
were made by directors, executive officers, and their related entities. The terms on these loans
and extensions are on substantially the same terms customary for
other similarly situated persons for the type of loan
involved. None of these loans to directors, executive officers, and their related entities were
impaired at March 31, 2009.
At March 31, 2009, Pinnacle Financial had $24.7 million of mortgage loans held-for-sale
compared to $25.5 million at December 31, 2008. These loans are marketed to potential investors
prior to closing the loan with the borrower such that there is an agreement for the subsequent sale
of the loan between the eventual investor and Pinnacle Financial prior to the loan being closed with
the borrower. Pinnacle Financial sells loans to investors on a loan-by-loan basis and has not
entered into any forward commitments with investors for future loan sales. All of these loan sales
transfer servicing rights to the buyer. During the three months ended March 31, 2009 Pinnacle
Financial recognized $1,522,000 in gains on the sale of these loans compared to $652,000, in the
first quarter of 2008.
At March 31, 2009, Pinnacle Financial owned $19,817,000 in other real estate which had been
acquired, usually through foreclosure, from borrowers compared to $18,306,000 at December 31, 2008.
Substantially all of these amounts relate to homes and residential development projects that are
either completed or are in various stages of construction for which Pinnacle Financial believes it
has adequate collateral.
Note 5. Income Taxes
Pinnacle Financials income tax expense differs from the amounts computed by applying the
Federal income tax statutory rates of 35% to income before income taxes. A reconciliation of the
differences for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Income taxes at statutory rate |
|
$ |
1,044,126 |
|
|
$ |
3,025,310 |
|
State tax (benefit) expense, net of
Federal tax effect |
|
|
8,950 |
|
|
|
(14,857 |
) |
Federal tax credits |
|
|
(24,134 |
) |
|
|
(57,625 |
) |
Tax-exempt securities |
|
|
(128,133 |
) |
|
|
(296,618 |
) |
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
(18,302 |
) |
|
|
(81,097 |
) |
Insurance premiums |
|
|
(23,464 |
) |
|
|
(63,184 |
) |
Other items |
|
|
33,965 |
|
|
|
67,024 |
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
893,008 |
|
|
$ |
2,578,953 |
|
|
|
|
The effective tax rate for 2009 and 2008 is impacted by Federal tax credits related to the New
Markets Tax Credit program whereby a subsidiary of Pinnacle National has been awarded approximately
$2.3 million in future Federal tax credits which are available through 2010. Tax benefits related
to these credits will be recognized for financial reporting purposes in the same periods that the
credits are recognized in the Companys income tax returns. The credit that is available for the
years ending December 31, 2009 and for the year ended December 31, 2008 is $360,000. Pinnacle
Financial believes that it will comply with the various regulatory provisions of the New Markets
Tax Credit program, and therefore has reflected the impact of the credits in its estimated annual
effective tax rate for 2009 and 2008.
Page 14
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 6. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
In the normal course of business, Pinnacle Financial has entered into off-balance sheet
financial instruments which include commitments to extend credit (i.e., including unfunded lines of
credit) and standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit are usually the result of lines
of credit granted to existing borrowers under agreements that the total outstanding indebtedness
will not exceed a specific amount during the term of the indebtedness. Typical borrowers are
commercial concerns that use lines of credit to supplement their treasury management functions,
thus their total outstanding indebtedness may fluctuate during any time period based on the
seasonality of their business and the resultant timing of their cash flows. Other typical lines of
credit are related
to home equity loans granted to consumers. Commitments to extend credit generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.
Standby letters of credit are generally issued on behalf of an applicant (our customer) to a
specifically named beneficiary and are the result of a particular business arrangement that exists
between the applicant and the beneficiary. Standby letters of credit have fixed expiration dates
and are usually for terms of two years or less unless terminated beforehand due to criteria
specified in the standby letter of credit. A typical arrangement involves the applicant routinely
being indebted to the beneficiary for such items as inventory purchases, insurance, utilities,
lease guarantees or other third party commercial transactions. The standby letter of credit would
permit the beneficiary to obtain payment from Pinnacle Financial under certain prescribed
circumstances. Subsequently, Pinnacle Financial would then seek reimbursement from the applicant
pursuant to the terms of the standby letter of credit.
Pinnacle Financial follows the same credit policies and underwriting practices when making
these commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Each customers creditworthiness is
evaluated on a case-by-case basis, and the amount of collateral obtained, if any, is based on
managements credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies but may include cash, real
estate and improvements, marketable securities, accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, and
personal property.
The contractual amounts of these commitments are not reflected in the consolidated financial
statements and would only be reflected if drawn upon. Since many of the commitments are expected
to expire without being drawn upon, the contractual amounts do not necessarily represent future
cash requirements. However, should the commitments be drawn upon and should our customers default
on their resulting obligation to us, Pinnacle Financials maximum exposure to credit loss, without
consideration of collateral, is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments.
A summary of Pinnacle Financials total contractual amount for all off-balance sheet
commitments at March 31, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$ |
1,008,274,000 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
95,300,000 |
|
At March 31, 2009, the fair value of Pinnacle Financials standby letters of credit was
$109,000. This amount represents the unamortized fee associated with these standby letters of
credit and is included in the consolidated balance sheet of Pinnacle Financial. This fair value
will decrease over time as the existing standby letters of credit approach their expiration dates.
Various legal claims also arise from time to time in the normal course of business. In the
opinion of management, the resolution of these claims outstanding at March 31, 2009 will not have a
material impact on Pinnacle Financials financial statements.
Visa Litigation Pinnacle National is a member of the Visa USA network. Under Visa USA
bylaws, Visa members are obligated to indemnify Visa USA and/or its parent company, Visa, Inc.
(Visa), for potential future settlement of, or judgments resulting from, certain litigation, which
Visa refers to as the covered litigation. Pinnacle Nationals indemnification obligation is
limited to its membership proportion of Visa USA. On November 7, 2007, Visa announced the
settlement of its American Express litigation, and disclosed in its annual report to the SEC on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007 that Visa had accrued a contingent liability for
the estimated settlement of its Discover litigation. Accordingly, Pinnacle National expensed and
recognized a contingent liability in the amount of $145,000 as an estimate for its membership
proportion of the American Express settlement and the potential Discover settlement, as well as its
membership proportion of the amount that Pinnacle National estimates will be required for Visa to
settle the remaining covered litigation. During the fourth quarter of 2008, Pinnacle National
expensed and recognized an additional $28,000 contingent liability for the revised estimated
settlement of Visas Discover litigation.
Page 15
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Visa completed an initial public offering (IPO) in March 2008. Visa used a portion of the
proceeds from the IPO to establish a $3.0 billion escrow for settlement of covered litigation and
used substantially all of the remaining portion to redeem class B and class C shares held by Visa
issuing members. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, Pinnacle Financial recognized a
pre-tax gain of $140,000 on redemption proceeds received from Visa, Inc. and reversed $63,000 of
the $145,000 litigation expense recognized as its pro-rata share of the $3.0 billion escrow funded
by Visa, Inc. The timing for ultimate settlement of all covered litigation is not determinable at
this time.
Note 7. Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights and Restricted Shares
Pinnacle Financial has two equity incentive plans. Additionally, Pinnacle Financial has
acquired equity plans in connection with acquisitions of Cavalry and Mid-America under which it has
granted stock options to its employees to purchase common stock at or above the fair market value
on the date of grant and granted restricted share awards to employees and directors. At March 31,
2009, there were 273,860 shares available for issue under these plans.
During the first quarter of 2006 and in connection with its merger with Cavalry Bancorp, Inc.
(Cavalry), Pinnacle Financial assumed a third equity incentive plan, the 1999 Cavalry Bancorp,
Inc. Stock Option Plan (the Cavalry Plan). All options granted under the Cavalry Plan were fully
vested prior to Pinnacle Financials merger with Cavalry and expire at various dates between
January 2011 and June 2012. In connection with the merger, all options to acquire Cavalry common
stock were converted to options to acquire Pinnacle Financials common stock at the 0.95 exchange
ratio. The exercise price of the outstanding options under the Cavalry Plan was adjusted using the
same exchange ratio. All other terms of the Cavalry options were unchanged. At March 31, 2009,
there were 195,551 Pinnacle Financial shares which could be acquired by the participants in the
Cavalry Plan at exercise prices that ranged between $10.26 per share and $13.68 per share.
On November 30, 2007 and in connection with its merger with Mid-America, Pinnacle Financial
assumed several equity incentive plans, including the Mid-America Bancshares, Inc. 2006 Omnibus
Equity Incentive Plan (the Mid-America Plans). All options and stock appreciation rights granted
under the Mid-America Plans were fully vested prior to Pinnacle Financials merger with Mid-America
and expire at various dates between June 2011 and July 2017. In connection with the merger, all
options and stock appreciation rights to acquire Mid-America common stock were converted to options
or stock appreciation rights, as applicable, to acquire Pinnacle Financial common stock at the
0.4655 exchange ratio. The exercise price of the outstanding options and stock appreciation rights
under the Mid-America Plans was adjusted using the same exchange ratio with the exercise price also
being reduced by $1.50 per share. All other terms of the Mid-America options and stock
appreciation rights were unchanged. There were 487,835 Pinnacle Financial shares which could be
acquired by the participants in the Mid-America Plan at exercise prices that ranged between $6.63
per share and $21.37 per share. At March 31, 2009, there were 67,356 shares available for issue
under the Mid-America Plans, which shares may only be issued to Pinnacle associates that were
Mid-America associates prior to the merger.
Common Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights
As of March 31, 2009, of the approximately 2,170,944 stock options and 10,671 stock
appreciation rights outstanding, 1,215,599 options were granted with the intention to be incentive
stock options qualifying under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code for favorable tax treatment
to the option holder while 955,345 options would be deemed non-qualified stock options or stock
appreciation rights and thus not subject to favorable tax treatment to the option holder. All
stock options granted under the Pinnacle Financial equity incentive plans vest in equal increments
over five years from the date of grant and are exercisable over a period of ten years from the date
of grant. All stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under the Cavalry Plan and
Mid-America Plans were fully vested at the date of those mergers.
A summary of the activity within the equity incentive plans during the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and information regarding expected vesting, contractual terms remaining, intrinsic
values and other matters was as follows:
Page 16
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Average |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Contractual |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Remaining Term |
|
Value (1) |
|
|
Number |
|
Price |
|
(in years) |
|
(000s) |
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
2,232,100 |
|
|
$ |
17.41 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
|
|
$ |
28,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised (2) |
|
|
(50,485 |
) |
|
|
10.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
2,181,615 |
|
|
$ |
17.51 |
|
|
|
5.75 |
|
|
$ |
17,731 |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding and expected to vest as of
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
2,149,496 |
|
|
$ |
17.35 |
|
|
|
5.72 |
|
|
$ |
17,720 |
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at March 31, 2009 (3) |
|
|
1,115,391 |
|
|
$ |
13.47 |
|
|
|
5.03 |
|
|
$ |
16,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise
price of the underlying awards and the quoted closing price of Pinnacle Financial common
stock of $23.71 per common share for the approximately 1.4 million options and stock
appreciation rights that were in-the-money at March 31, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
There were no stock appreciation rights exercised during three months ended March 31,
2009. |
|
(3) |
|
In addition to these outstanding options, there were 345,000 warrants issued to
founders of Pinnacle Financial that were outstanding at March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008. These warrants, when exercised, will result in the issuance of common shares. |
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, 153,938 option awards vested at an average
exercise price of $20.41 and an intrinsic value of approximately $2.6 million.
As of March 31, 2009, there was approximately $4.8 million of total unrecognized compensation
cost related to unvested stock options granted under our equity incentive plans. That cost is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.95 years.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, Pinnacle
Financial recorded stock option
compensation expense of $434,000 and $515,000, respectively, using the Black-Scholes valuation
model for awards granted prior to, but not yet vested, as of January 1, 2006 and for awards granted
after January 1, 2006. For these awards, Pinnacle Financial has recognized compensation expense
using a straight-line amortization method. Stock-based compensation expense has been reduced for
estimated forfeitures.
There were no options granted in the first quarter of 2009. The fair value of options granted
during the three month period ended March 31, 2008 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model and the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
3.20 |
% |
Expected life of options |
|
6.5 years |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
28.5 |
% |
Weighted average fair value |
|
$ |
7.76 |
|
Pinnacle Financials computation of expected volatility is based on weekly historical
volatility since September 2002. Pinnacle Financial used the simplified method in determining the
estimated life of stock option issuances. The risk free interest rate of the
award is based on the closing market bid for U.S. Treasury securities corresponding to the
expected life of the stock option issuances in effect at the time of grant.
Page 17
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Restricted Shares
Additionally, Pinnacle Financials 2004 Equity Incentive Plan and the Mid-America Plan provide
for the granting of restricted share awards and other performance or market-based awards. There
were no market-based awards outstanding as of March 31, 2009 under either of these plans. During
the three months ended March 31, 2009, Pinnacle Financial awarded 262,273 shares of restricted
common stock awards to certain Pinnacle Financial associates and outside directors.
A summary of activity for unvested restricted share awards for the three months ended March
31, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Number |
|
Average Cost |
|
|
|
Unvested at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
231,881 |
|
|
$ |
24.76 |
|
Shares awarded |
|
|
262,273 |
|
|
|
19.90 |
|
Restrictions lapsed and shares released to
associates/directors |
|
|
(27,474 |
) |
|
|
24.16 |
|
Shares forfeited |
|
|
(14,179 |
) |
|
|
32.83 |
|
|
|
|
Unvested at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
452,501 |
|
|
$ |
21.72 |
|
|
|
|
Status of 2009 Restricted Share Awards: There were 262,273 restricted share awards granted
during the first quarter of 2009. The following discusses the current status of these awards:
|
|
|
The forfeiture restrictions on 30,878 restricted share awards granted to executive
management in 2009 lapse in three equal installments should Pinnacle Financial achieve
certain earnings and soundness targets over each year of the subsequent three-year period
(or, alternatively, the cumulative three-year period). |
|
|
|
|
The forfeiture restrictions on another 92,669 restricted share awards granted to
executive management lapse in equal installments on the anniversary date of the grant over
a 10 year period or until the associate is 65 years of age, whichever is earlier so long as
Pinnacle Financial is profitable for that year. |
|
|
|
|
The forfeiture restrictions on 124,614 restricted share awards lapse in five equal
installments on the anniversary date of the grant so long as Pinnacle Financial is
profitable for that year. |
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2009, 14,112 restricted share awards were issued to
the outside members of the board of directors in accordance with their board compensation
plan. Restrictions lapse on the one year anniversary date of the award based on each
individual board member meeting their attendance goals for the various board and board
committee meetings to which each member was scheduled to attend. Each non-employee board
member received an award of 1,008 shares. |
Compensation expense associated with the performance based restricted share awards is
recognized over the time period that the restrictions associated with the awards are anticipated to
lapse based on a graded vesting schedule such that each traunche is amortized separately.
Compensation expense associated with the time based restricted share awards is recognized over the
time period that the restrictions associated with the awards lapse based on the total cost of the
award. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, Pinnacle Financial recognized approximately
$441,000 in compensation costs attributable to all restricted share awards issued prior to March
31, 2009.
Note
8. Other borrowings
Pinnacle
Financial has a loan agreement related to a $25 million line of
credit with a regional bank. This line of credit is used to support
the growth of Pinnacle National. The balance owed pursuant to this
line of credit at March 31, 2009 was $18 million. The line
of credit has a one year term, contains customary affirmative and
negative covenants regarding the operation of our business, a
negative pledge on the common stock of Pinnacle National and is
priced at 30-day LIBOR plus 200 basis points. As of March 31,
2009, Pinnacle Financial was in violation of a covenant limiting the
amount of nonperforming assets Pinnacle Financial could have at any
quarterly reporting date. On April 23, 2009, Pinnacle Financial
received a waiver of this covenant violation from the lender.
Note 9. Regulatory Matters
Pinnacle National is subject to restrictions on the payment of dividends to Pinnacle Financial
under federal banking laws and the regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Pinnacle Financial is also subject to limits on payment of dividends to its shareholders by the
rules, regulations and policies of federal banking authorities and by its participation in the CPP.
Pinnacle Financial has not paid any cash dividends since inception, and it does not anticipate
that it will consider paying dividends until Pinnacle Financial generates sufficient capital
through net income from operations to support both anticipated asset growth and dividend payments.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, Pinnacle National paid dividend payments of $1.2
million to
Pinnacle Financial to fund Pinnacle Financials interest payments due on its subordinated
indebtedness and an additional $1.2 million to Pinnacle Financial to fund Pinnacle Financials
preferred stock dividend payable on the shares issued to the U.S. Treasury in the CPP. At March
31, 2009, pursuant to federal banking regulations, Pinnacle National had approximately $55.4
million of net retained profits from the previous two years available for future dividend payments
to Pinnacle Financial.
Page 18
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Pinnacle Financial and its banking subsidiary are subject to various regulatory capital
requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements
can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary actions, by regulators that,
if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements. Under capital
adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, Pinnacle Financial
and its banking subsidiary must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures
of the assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory
accounting practices. Pinnacle Financials and its banking subsidiary capital amounts and
classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk
weightings, and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require Pinnacle
Financial and Pinnacle National to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier I capital
to risk-weighted assets and of Tier I capital to average assets. Management believes, as of March
31, 2009, that Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National met all capital adequacy requirements to
which they are subject. To be categorized as well-capitalized, Pinnacle National must maintain
minimum Total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the
following table. Pinnacle Financials and Pinnacle Nationals actual capital amounts and ratios
are presented in the following table (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Well-Capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
Under Prompt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Corrective |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Requirement |
|
|
Action Provisions |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk weighted assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Financial |
|
$ |
510,242 |
|
|
|
13.34 |
% |
|
$ |
306,047 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
not applicable
|
Pinnacle National |
|
$ |
435,559 |
|
|
|
11.40 |
% |
|
$ |
305,576 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
381,970 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Financial |
|
$ |
449,852 |
|
|
|
11.76 |
% |
|
$ |
153,182 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
not applicable
|
Pinnacle National |
|
$ |
375,169 |
|
|
|
9.82 |
% |
|
$ |
152,788 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
229,182 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Tier I capital to average assets (*): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Financial |
|
$ |
449,852 |
|
|
|
9.74 |
% |
|
$ |
184,649 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
not applicable
|
Pinnacle National |
|
$ |
375,169 |
|
|
|
8.14 |
% |
|
$ |
184,307 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
230,384 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Average assets for the above calculations were based on the most recent quarter. |
Note
10. Derivative Instruments
Financial derivatives are reported at fair value in other assets or other liabilities. The
accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on whether it has been designated
and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship. For derivatives not designated as hedges, the
gain or loss is recognized in current earnings. Pinnacle Financial enters into interest rate swaps
(swaps) to facilitate customer transactions and meet their financing needs. Upon entering into
these instruments to meet customer needs, Pinnacle Financial enters into offsetting positions in
order to minimize the risk to Pinnacle Financial. These swaps qualify as derivatives, but are not
designated as hedging instruments.
Interest rate swap contracts involve the risk of dealing with counterparties and their ability
to meet contractual terms. When the fair value of a derivative instrument contract is positive,
this generally indicates that the counter party or customer owes Pinnacle Financial, and results in
credit risk to Pinnacle Financial. When the fair value of a derivative instrument contract is
negative, Pinnacle Financial owes the customer or counterparty and therefore, has no credit risk.
Page 19
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
A summary of Pinnacle Financials interest rate swaps as of March 31, 2009 is included in the
following table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
Interest rate swap agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay fixed / receive variable swaps |
|
$ |
196,389 |
|
|
$ |
17,164 |
|
Pay variable / receive fixed swaps |
|
|
196,389 |
|
|
|
(17,327 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
392,778 |
|
|
$ |
(163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 20
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The following is a discussion of our financial condition at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
and our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. The purpose of
this discussion is to focus on information about our financial condition and results of operations
which is not otherwise apparent from the consolidated financial statements. The following
discussion and analysis should be read along with our consolidated financial statements and the
related notes included elsewhere herein.
Overview
General. Our rapid organic growth continues to have a material impact on Pinnacle Financials
financial condition and results of operations in 2009 as compared to 2008. Our fully diluted net
income per share for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $0.03 and $0.26,
respectively. At March 31, 2009, loans totaled $3.474 billion, as compared to $3.355 billion at
December 31, 2008, while total deposits increased to $3.751 billion at March 31, 2009 from $3.533
billion at December 31, 2008.
Results of Operations. Our net interest income increased to $28.7 million for the first three
months of 2009 compared to $27.4 million for the first three months of 2008. The net interest
margin (the ratio of net interest income to average earning assets) for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 was 2.72% compared to 3.37% for the same period in 2008.
Our provision for loan losses was $13.6 million for the first three months of 2009 compared to $1.6
million for the same period in 2008. Impacting the provision for loan losses in any accounting
period are several matters including the amount of loan growth during the period, the level of
charge-offs or recoveries incurred during the period, the changes in the amount of impaired loans
and the results of our quarterly assessment of the inherent risks of our loan portfolio. During the
first quarter of 2009, we incurred net charge-offs of $4.8 million compared to $190,000 in the
first quarter of 2008. Additionally, during the first quarter of 2009, we increased our allowance
for loan losses from 1.09% at December 31, 2008 to 1.30% at March 31, 2009 due to these increased
levels of charge-offs and nonperforming loans.
Noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008
increased by $4.8 million, or 57.0%. This increase was primarily due to our recording gains on the
sale of investment securities of approximately $4.3 million as a result of restructuring of the
bond portfolio. Excluding gains on the sale of investment securities, Pinnacles noninterest income
increased by 5.0 percent between the first quarter of 2009 and the first quarter of 2008.
Our continued growth in 2009 resulted in increased noninterest expense compared to 2008 due to
increases in salaries and employee benefits and other operating
expenses. The number of full-time equivalent employees increased from 686.0 at March 31, 2008 to
736.0 at March 31, 2009. As a result, we experienced increases in compensation and employee
benefit expense. We expect to add additional employees throughout 2009 which should also cause our
compensation and employee benefit expense to increase in 2009. Additionally, our branch expansion
efforts during the last few years and the addition of the new associates in 2009 will also increase
noninterest expense. Our efficiency ratio (the ratio of noninterest expense to the sum of net
interest income and noninterest income) was 60.3% for the first three months of 2009 compared to
71.4% for the same period in 2008.
The effective income tax expense rate for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was approximately
29.9%, compared to an effective income tax expense rate for the three months ended March 31, 2009
of approximately 29.8%.
Net income available for common stockholders for the first three months of 2009 was $0.6 million
compared to $6.1 million for the same period in 2008, a decrease of 89.4%. Included in net income
available to common stockholders was $1.43 million of charges related to preferred stock dividends
and accretion of the preferred stock discount. As a result, net income was $2.1 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to $6.1 million for the three months ended March 31,
2008.
Financial Condition. Loans increased $119 million during the first three months of 2009. We have
grown our total deposits to $3.751 billion at March 31, 2009 compared to $3.533 billion at December
31, 2008, an increase of $218 million. In comparing the composition of the average balances of our
deposits between the first quarter of 2009 with the first quarter of 2008, we have
Page 21
experienced increased growth in our higher cost certificate of deposit balances than in any other
category. This increase in reliance on higher cost deposits has contributed to a reduced net
interest margin between the two periods.
Capital and Liquidity. At March 31, 2009, our capital ratios, including our banks capital ratios,
met regulatory minimum capital requirements. Additionally, at March 31, 2009, our bank would be
considered to be well-capitalized pursuant to banking regulations. As our bank grows it may
require additional capital from us over that which can be earned through operations. We anticipate
that we will continue to use various capital raising techniques in order to support the growth of
our bank.
During 2008, we increased our capital accounts through our participation in the U.S. Department of
Treasurys Capital Purchase Program (the CPP). As a result of our participation in the CPP, we
issued 95,000 shares of preferred stock for $95 million. Additionally, we issued 534,910 common
stock warrants to the U.S. Treasury as a condition to our participation in the CPP. The warrants
have an exercise price of $26.64 each, are immediately exercisable and expire 10 years from the
date of issuance. The common stock warrants have
been assigned a fair value of $6.7 million as of December
12, 2008. As a result, $6.7 million has been recorded as the discount on the preferred stock
issued in the CPP which will be accreted as a reduction in net income available for common
stockholders over the next five years at approximately $1.1 million to $1.3 million per year. The
resulting $88.3 million has been assigned to the Series A preferred stock issued in the CPP and
will be accreted up to the redemption amount of $95 million over the next five years.
Additionally, during 2008, we sold one million shares of our common stock for $21.5 million which
also increased our capital accounts. In the past, we have been successful in procuring additional
capital from the capital markets (via public and private offerings of trust preferred securities
and common stock). This additional capital was required to support our growth. As of March 31,
2009, we believe we have access to sufficient capital to support our current growth plans.
However, expansion by acquisition of other banks or by branching into a new geographic market or by
redemption of the preferred shares issued in connection with our participation in the CPP (which we
may redeem at anytime subject to prior consultation with our primary federal regulator), could
result in issuance of additional capital, including additional common shares.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The accounting principles we follow and our methods of applying these principles conform with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles and with general practices within the banking industry.
In connection with the application of those principles, we have made judgments and estimates which,
in the case of the determination of our allowance for loan losses and the assessment of impairment
of the intangibles resulting from our mergers with Mid-America Bancshares, Inc. (Mid-America) and
Cavalry Bancorp, Inc. (Cavalry) have been critical to the determination of our financial
position and results of operations.
Allowance for Loan Losses (allowance). Our management assesses the adequacy of the allowance
prior to the end of each calendar quarter. This assessment includes procedures to estimate the
allowance and test the adequacy and appropriateness of the resulting balance. The level of the
allowance is based upon managements evaluation of the loan portfolios, past loan loss experience,
current asset quality trends, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that
may affect the borrowers ability to repay (including the timing of future payment), the estimated
value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, economic conditions,
industry and peer bank loan quality indications and other pertinent factors, including regulatory
recommendations. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates
including the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans
that may be susceptible to significant change. Loan losses are charged off when management
believes that the full collectability of the loan is unlikely. A loan may be partially charged-off
after a confirming event has occurred which serves to validate that full repayment pursuant to
the terms of the loan is unlikely. Allocation of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but
the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in managements judgment, is deemed to be
uncollectible.
Larger balance commercial and commercial real estate loans are impaired when, based on current
information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according
to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Collection of all amounts due according to the
contractual terms means that both the interest and principal payments of a loan will be collected
as scheduled in the loan agreement.
An impairment allowance is recognized if the fair value of the loan is less than the recorded
investment in the loan (recorded investment in the loan is the principal balance plus any accrued
interest, net of deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premium or discount). The impairment
is recognized through the allowance. Loans that are impaired are recorded at the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, or if the loan is
collateral dependent, impairment measurement is based on the fair value of the collateral, less
estimated disposal costs. Management believes it follows appropriate accounting and regulatory
guidance in determining impairment and accrual status of impaired
loans.
Page 22
The level of allowance maintained is believed by management to be adequate to absorb probable
losses inherent in the portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is increased by
provisions charged to expense and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries of amounts previously
charged-off.
In assessing the adequacy of the allowance, we also consider the results of our ongoing independent
loan review process. We undertake this process both to ascertain whether there are loans in the
portfolio whose credit quality has weakened over time and to assist in our overall evaluation of
the risk characteristics of the entire loan portfolio. Our loan review process includes the
judgment of management, the input from our independent loan reviewers, and reviews that may have
been conducted by bank regulatory agencies as part of their usual examination process. We
incorporate loan review results in the determination of whether or not it is probable that we will
be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of a loan.
As part of managements quarterly assessment of the allowance, management divides the loan
portfolio into four segments: commercial, commercial real estate, consumer and consumer real
estate. Each segment is then analyzed such that an allocation of the allowance is estimated for
each loan segment.
The allowance allocation for commercial and commercial real estate loans begins with a process of
estimating the probable losses inherent for these types of loans. The estimates for these loans
are established by category and based on our internal system of credit risk ratings and historical
loss data. The estimated loan loss allocation rate for
our internal system of credit risk grades for commercial and commercial real estate loans is based
on managements experience with similarly graded loans,
discussions with banking regulators and industry loss factors. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we also performed a
migration analysis of all loans that were charged-off during the previous two years. A migration
analysis assists in evaluating loan loss allocation rates for the various risk grades assigned to
loans in our portfolio. We incorporated the migration analysis along with other factors to
determine the loss allocation rates for the commercial and commercial real estate portfolios.
Subsequently, we weighted the allocation methodologies for the commercial and commercial real
estate portfolios and determined a weighted average allocation for these portfolios.
The allowance allocation for consumer and consumer real estate loans which includes installment,
home equity, consumer mortgages, automobiles and others is established for each of the categories
by estimating probable losses inherent in that particular category of consumer and consumer real
estate loans. The estimated loan loss allocation rate for each category is based on managements
experience, consideration of our actual loss rates, industry loss rates and loss rates of various
peer bank groups. Consumer and consumer real estate loans are evaluated as a group by category
(i.e. retail real estate, installment, etc.) rather than on an individual loan basis because these
loans are smaller and homogeneous. We weight the allocation methodologies for the consumer and
consumer real estate portfolios and determine a weighted average allocation for these portfolios.
The estimated loan loss allocation for all four loan portfolio segments is then adjusted for
managements estimate of probable losses for several environmental factors. The allocation for
environmental factors is particularly subjective and does not lend itself to exact mathematical
calculation. This amount represents estimated probable inherent credit losses which exist, but
have not yet been identified, as of the balance sheet date, and are based upon quarterly trend
assessments in delinquent and nonaccrual loans, unanticipated charge-offs, credit concentration
changes, prevailing economic conditions, changes in lending personnel experience, changes in
lending policies or procedures and other influencing factors. These environmental factors are
considered for each of the four loan segments and the allowance allocation, as determined by the
processes noted above for each component, is increased or decreased based on the incremental
assessment of these various environmental factors.
The assessment also includes an unallocated
component. We believe that the unallocated amount is
warranted for inherent factors that cannot be practically assigned to individual loan categories.
An example is the imprecision in the overall measurement process, in particular the volatility of
the national and local economy.
We then test the resulting allowance by comparing the balance in the allowance to historical trends
and industry and peer information. Our management then evaluates the result of the procedures
performed, including the result of our testing, and concludes on the appropriateness of the balance
of the allowance in its entirety. The audit committee of our board of directors reviews and
approves the assessment prior to the filing of quarterly and annual financial information.
Impairment of Intangible Assets Long-lived assets, including purchased intangible assets subject to amortization, such as our core
deposit intangible asset, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the
carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by
the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its
Page 23
estimated future cash flows, an
impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the
fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the balance
sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no
longer depreciated.
Goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are evaluated for impairment
annually and are evaluated for impairment more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that
the asset might be impaired. That annual assessment date is
September 30. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying
amount exceeds the assets fair value. The goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step test. The
first step, used to identify potential impairment, involves comparing each reporting units
estimated fair value to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value of a
reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is considered not to be impaired. If the
carrying value exceeds estimated fair value, there is an indication of potential impairment and the
second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment.
If required, the second step involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill for each
reporting unit for which the first step indicated impairment. The implied fair value of goodwill is
determined in a manner similar to the amount of goodwill calculated in a business combination, by
measuring the excess of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in the first
step, over the aggregate estimated fair values of the individual assets, liabilities and
identifiable intangibles as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination. If
the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying value of goodwill assigned to the reporting
unit, there is no impairment. If the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit
exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess. An
impairment loss cannot exceed the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit, and the
loss establishes a new basis in the goodwill.
Our stock price has historically traded above its book value per common share and tangible book
value per common share and was trading above its book value per common share and tangible book
value per common share as of March 31, 2009. In the event our stock price were to trade below its
book value per common share and tangible book value per common share, we would perform our usual
evaluation of the carrying value of goodwill as of the reporting date. Such a circumstance would
be one factor in our evaluation that could result in an eventual goodwill impairment charge.
Additionally, should our future earnings and cash flows decline and/or discount rates increase, an
impairment charge to goodwill and other intangible assets may also be required.
Results of Operations
The following is a summary of our results of operations (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-2008 |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Percent |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Increase |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(decrease) |
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
49,518 |
|
|
$ |
52,161 |
|
|
|
-5.1 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
20,818 |
|
|
|
24,802 |
|
|
|
-16.1 |
% |
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
28,700 |
|
|
|
27,359 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
13,610 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
755.4 |
% |
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
15,090 |
|
|
|
25,768 |
|
|
|
-41.4 |
% |
Noninterest income |
|
|
13,136 |
|
|
|
8,367 |
|
|
|
57.0 |
% |
Noninterest expense |
|
|
25,243 |
|
|
|
25,491 |
|
|
|
-1.0 |
% |
|
|
|
Net income before income taxes |
|
|
2,983 |
|
|
|
8,644 |
|
|
|
-65.5 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
2,579 |
|
|
|
-65.4 |
% |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
2,090 |
|
|
|
6,065 |
|
|
|
-65.5 |
% |
|
|
|
Preferred dividends and preferred stock discount
accretion |
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
643 |
|
|
$ |
6,065 |
|
|
|
-89.4 |
% |
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share available to common
stockholders |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
-88.9 |
% |
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share available to
common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
-88.5 |
% |
|
|
|
Page 24
Net Interest Income. Net interest income represents the amount by which interest earned on various
earning assets exceeds interest paid on deposits and other interest bearing liabilities and is the
most significant component of our earnings. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, we
recorded net interest income of $28.7 million and $27.4 million respectively, which resulted in a
net interest margin of 2.72% and 3.37%.
The following table sets forth the amount of our average balances, interest income or interest
expense for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the
average interest rate for total interest-earning assets and total interest-bearing liabilities, net
interest spread and net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rates/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rates/ |
|
|
|
Balances |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Yields |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Yields |
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
3,416,462 |
|
|
$ |
38,526 |
|
|
|
4.57 |
% |
|
$ |
2,761,745 |
|
|
$ |
45,392 |
|
|
|
6.61 |
% |
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
716,317 |
|
|
|
9,088 |
|
|
|
5.15 |
% |
|
|
367,125 |
|
|
|
4,637 |
|
|
|
5.12 |
% |
Tax-exempt (1) |
|
|
147,963 |
|
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
5.33 |
% |
|
|
136,690 |
|
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
|
5.24 |
% |
Federal funds sold and other |
|
|
73,435 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
2.57 |
% |
|
|
58,892 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
5.56 |
% |
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
4,354,177 |
|
|
|
49,518 |
|
|
|
4.66 |
% |
|
|
3,324,452 |
|
|
|
52,161 |
|
|
|
6.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonearning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
260,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other nonearning assets |
|
|
254,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,869,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,774,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest checking |
|
$ |
359,524 |
|
|
$ |
428 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
% |
|
$ |
404,307 |
|
|
$ |
2,129 |
|
|
|
2.12 |
% |
Savings and money market |
|
|
715,704 |
|
|
|
1,940 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
% |
|
|
735,899 |
|
|
|
4,098 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
% |
Time |
|
|
2,155,478 |
|
|
|
15,366 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
% |
|
|
1,372,899 |
|
|
|
14,859 |
|
|
|
4.35 |
% |
|
|
|
Total interest bearing deposits |
|
|
3,230,706 |
|
|
|
17,734 |
|
|
|
2.23 |
% |
|
|
2,513,105 |
|
|
|
21,086 |
|
|
|
3.37 |
% |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
229,918 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
% |
|
|
169,146 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
1.98 |
% |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
and other borrowings |
|
|
234,887 |
|
|
|
1,571 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
% |
|
|
143,802 |
|
|
|
1,426 |
|
|
|
3.99 |
% |
Subordinated debt |
|
|
97,476 |
|
|
|
1,152 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
% |
|
|
82,476 |
|
|
|
1,458 |
|
|
|
7.11 |
% |
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
3,792,987 |
|
|
|
20,818 |
|
|
|
2.23 |
% |
|
|
2,908,529 |
|
|
|
24,802 |
|
|
|
3.43 |
% |
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
417,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
368,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits and interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
4,210,848 |
|
|
|
20,818 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
% |
|
|
3,276,942 |
|
|
|
24,802 |
|
|
|
3.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
24,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
634,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
474,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
4,869,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,774,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.94 |
% |
Net interest margin (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Yields computed on tax-exempt instruments on a tax equivalent basis. |
|
(2) |
|
Yields realized on interest-earning assets less the rates paid on interest-bearing
liabilities. |
|
(3) |
|
Net interest margin is the result of annualized net interest income calculated on a
tax-equivalent basis divided by average interest-earning assets for the period. |
Page 25
As noted above, the net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was 2.72%,
compared to a net interest margin of 3.37% for the same period in 2008. Our net interest margin
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was 19.3% less than our margin during the same period in
the previous year. The reduction in the net interest margin was significant as the net decreases
in the yield on interest-earning assets was 171 basis points compared to the decrease in the rate
paid on total deposits and interest-bearing liabilities of only 103 basis points. Other matters
related to the changes in net interest income, net interest yields and rates, and net interest
margin are presented below:
|
|
|
Our loan yields were 2.04% less during the three months ended March 31, 2009 when
compared to the same period in 2008. A significant amount of our loan portfolio has
variable rate pricing with a large portion of these loans tied to our prime lending rate.
Our weighted average prime rate for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was 3.25%
compared to 6.22% for the same period in 2008 reflecting the reduction of the Federal Funds
rate between these periods. Our prime lending rate moves in concert with the Federal
Reserves changes to its Federal funds rate. The reduction in loan rates had a negative
impact on our margin when comparing the three months ended March 31, 2009 with the same
period in 2008. |
|
|
|
|
During the first three months of 2009, overall deposit rates were less than those rates
for the comparable period in 2008 by 33.8%. Changes in interest rates paid on such
products as interest checking, savings and money market accounts, securities sold under
agreements to repurchase and Federal funds purchased will generally increase or decrease in
a manner that is consistent with changes in the short-term rate environment. There was a
significant decrease in the short term rate environment during the first three months of
2009 when compared with the first three months of 2008. As a result, the rates for those
products experienced a large decrease between the two periods. However, competitive
deposit pricing pressures in our market limited our ability to reduce our funding costs
more aggressively and negatively impacted our net interest margin. We routinely monitor
the pricing of deposit products by our primary competitors. We believe that our markets
are very competitive banking markets with several new market entrants seeking deposit
growth. As a result, these events had a negative impact on our margin during the first
three months of 2009. |
|
|
|
|
During the first three months of 2009, the average balances of noninterest bearing
deposit balances, interest bearing transaction accounts, savings and money market accounts
and securities sold under agreements to repurchase amounted to 40.9% of our total funding
compared to 51.2% during the same period in 2008. The decrease in these products as a
percentage of total funding is attributable to the competitiveness of these products among
the local banking franchises and the significant growth we have experienced as we have
elected to fund lending opportunities through noncore sources. These funding sources
generally have lower rates than do other funding sources, such as certificates of deposit
and other borrowings. Additionally, noninterest bearing deposits comprised only 9.9% of
total funding in 2009, compared to 11.2% in 2008. Maintaining our noninterest bearing
deposit balances in relation to total funding is critical to maintaining and growing our
net interest margin. These matters contributed to a lower net interest margin during the first three
months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Also impacting the net interest margin during the first three months of 2009 was a
higher amount of floating rate subordinated indebtedness outstanding. The interest rate
charged on this indebtedness is generally higher than other funding sources. In October
2007, we issued an additional $30 million in floating rate subordinated indebtedness to
fund the cash component of the Mid-America purchase price. The rate we are required to pay
on this indebtedness is 285 basis points over three-month LIBOR. In August 2008, we also
issued $15 million in additional subordinated indebtedness at a rate of 350 basis points
over three month LIBOR. Proceeds from this issuance have been used for the anticipated
growth of Pinnacle Financial. These spreads are higher than the spreads associated with
our other forms of subordinated indebtedness which were issued in previous periods. |
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the yield curve was steeper than the same period in
2008 which is advantageous for most banks, including us, as we use a significant amount of
short-term funding to fund our balance sheet growth. This short-term funding comes in the form of
checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, short-term time deposits and securities
sold under agreements to repurchase. Rates paid on these short-term deposits generally correlate
to the Federal funds rate and short term treasury rates. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the
Federal Reserve, in response to increasing economic instability, reduced the targeted Federal funds
rate such that the targeted rate at year end 2008 was less than 0.25%. This reduction together
with previous Federal Reserve rate reductions in 2008 has facilitated the continual compression of
our net interest margins as we experience reduced yields on a significant portion of our earning
asset base but have not been able to counter this impact via reduced funding costs. At this time,
we do not believe we will be able to reduce the rates we are paying on our short-term deposits,
such as interest checking, savings and money market accounts due to competitive pressures.
Traditionally, we maintain an asset
sensitive balance sheet, thus when rates are increasing our net interest margin should expand.
Currently, we believe interest rates will be fairly stable throughout 2009. As a result, this will
likely limit our ability to increase our margin as a result of interest rate fluctuations.
Page 26
We believe we should be able to increase net interest income through overall growth in earning
assets in 2009 compared to previous periods. The additional revenues provided by increased loan
volumes should be sufficient to overcome any immediate increases in funding costs, and thus we
should be able to increase our current net interest income. We also believe our net interest
margin should increase during the remainder of 2009 due to several factors. One factor is that we believe the
rates we charge our loan customers are beginning to increase as we experience more pricing leverage
with our borrowers which includes not only implementation of more risk-based pricing initiatives
but also the implementation of loan rate floors on floating and variable rate loan products.
Additionally, our time deposit portfolio will continually reprice during 2009 and we believe the
pricing of these deposits will generally be lower in 2009 than in 2008. Offsetting these margin
gains will be the negative impact of increased levels of nonperforming assets during 2009.
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses represents a charge to earnings necessary
to establish an allowance for loan losses that, in managements evaluation, should be adequate to
provide coverage for the inherent losses on outstanding loans. The provision for loan losses
amounted to $13.6 million and $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Based upon our evaluation of the loan portfolio, we believe the allowance for loan losses to be
adequate to absorb our estimate of probable losses existing in the loan portfolio at March 31,
2009. Increases in nonperforming loans and net-charge offs and an overall increase in our
allowance for loan losses in relation to loan balances during the first three months of 2009 were
the primary reasons for the increase in the provision expense in 2009 when compared to 2008.
Based upon managements assessment of the loan portfolio, we adjust our allowance for loan losses
to an amount deemed appropriate to adequately cover probable losses in the loan portfolio. While
our policies and procedures used to estimate the allowance for loan losses, as well as the
resultant provision for loan losses charged to operations, are considered adequate by management
and are reviewed from time to time by our regulators, they are necessarily approximate and
imprecise. There are factors beyond our control, such as conditions in the local and national
economy, a local real estate market or particular industry conditions which may negatively impact,
materially, our asset quality and the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses and, thus, the
resulting provision for loan losses.
Noninterest Income. Our noninterest income is composed of several components, some of which vary
significantly between quarterly and annual periods. Service charges on deposit accounts and other
noninterest income generally reflect our growth, while investment services and fees from the
origination of mortgage loans will often reflect market conditions and fluctuate from period to
period. The opportunities for recognition of gains on loans and loan participations sold and gains
on sales of investment securities may also vary widely from quarter to quarter and year to year.
The following is the makeup of our noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-2008 |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Percent |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Increase |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(decrease) |
|
|
|
Noninterest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
2,477 |
|
|
$ |
2,574 |
|
|
|
-3.8 |
% |
Investment sales commissions |
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
-32.6 |
% |
Gains on loans sold, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees from the origination and sale of
mortgage loans, net of sales commissions |
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
133.4 |
% |
Gains (losses) on loan sales and loan
participations, net |
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
-100.0 |
% |
Insurance sales commissions |
|
|
1,305 |
|
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
% |
Net gain on sale of investments |
|
|
4,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Trust fees |
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
30.3 |
% |
Other noninterest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATM and other consumer fees |
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
% |
Letters of credit fees |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
% |
Bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
-46.1 |
% |
Swap fees on customer loan transactions, net |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
66.7 |
% |
Visa related gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
-100.0 |
% |
Other noninterest income |
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
$ |
13,136 |
|
|
$ |
8,367 |
|
|
|
57.0 |
% |
|
|
|
Page 27
Service charge income for 2009 decreased from that in 2008 due to decreased overdraft protection
charges and decreased per item insufficient fund charges.
Also included in noninterest income are commissions and fees from our financial advisory unit,
Pinnacle Asset Management, a division of Pinnacle National. At March 31, 2009, Pinnacle Asset
Management was receiving commissions and fees in connection with approximately $671 million in
brokerage assets held with Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. compared to $859 million at March
31, 2008. This decrease in brokerage assets was due to the overall devaluation in the securities
markets. This devaluation contributed to lower investment sales commissions during the first three
months of 2009 compared to 2008. We also offer trust services through Pinnacle Nationals trust
division. At March 31, 2009, our trust department was receiving fees on approximately $544 million
in assets compared to $493 million at March 31, 2008. The business development efforts of our
trust department resulted in an increase in assets under management. We also increased the number
of trust advisors in the past year. These factors contributed to an increase in trust fees for the
first three months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
Additionally, fees from the origination
and sale of mortgage loans also provided for a significant
portion of the increase in noninterest income. These mortgage fees are for loans originated in
both the middle Tennessee and Knoxville markets that are subsequently sold to third-party
investors. All of these loan sales transfer servicing rights to the buyer. Generally, mortgage
origination fees increase in lower interest rate environments and decrease in rising interest rate
environments. As a result, mortgage origination fees may fluctuate greatly in response to a
changing rate environment. Also impacting mortgage origination fees are the number of mortgage
originators we have offering these products. We increased the number
of mortgage originators in the past year. These originators are largely commission-based
employees. The gross fees from the origination and sale of mortgage loans have been offset by the
commission expense associated with these originations. We plan to continue to increase our
mortgage origination work force in 2009.
We also sell certain commercial loan participations to our correspondent banks. Such sales are
primarily related to new lending transactions in excess of internal loan limits or industry
concentration limits. At March 31, 2009 and pursuant to participation agreements with these
correspondents, we had participated approximately $122 million of originated loans to these other
banks. These participation agreements have various provisions regarding collateral position,
pricing and other matters. Many of these agreements provide that we pay the correspondent less
than the loans contracted interest rate. Pursuant to SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities a replacement of Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 125, in those transactions whereby the
correspondent is receiving a lesser amount of interest than the amount owed by the customer, we
record a net gain along with a corresponding asset representing the present value of our net
retained cash flows. The resulting asset is amortized over the term of the loan. Conversely, should
a loan be paid prior to maturity, any remaining unamortized asset is charged as a reduction to
gains on loan participations sold. We are also required to maintain the present value of the
difference in future cash flows to be collected from our customers and the cash flow that is
ultimately remitted to our correspondents as a net asset on our balance sheet. Over time this net
asset decreases as cash payments are collected from our customers and subsequently remitted to our
correspondent banks. At each quarter end, we evaluate the discount rate we are using to measure
the present value of these future cash flows and adjust this discount rate to a market based rate.
Should the discount rate we are using to measure these cash flows change during the current
accounting period, the result of the change is reflected in our
statement of income.
As a result of these matters, during the three months ended March 31, 2009, we expensed $234,000
compared to a $4,000 gain during the three months ended March 31, 2008. We intend to maintain
relationships with our correspondents in order to sell participations in future loans to these or
other correspondents primarily due to limitations on loans to a single borrower or industry
concentrations. In general, our acquisitions and our growth have resulted in an increase in
capital which has resulted in increased lending limits for such items as loans to a single borrower
and loans to a single industry such that our need to participate such loans in the future may be
reduced. In any event, the timing of participations may cause the level of gains, if any, to vary
significantly.
During the
three months ended March 31, 2009, we sold approximately
$201 million of our available-for-sale investment securities in
order to reposition our bond portfolio for asset liability management
purposes. As a result of the sale of these securities, we realized a
$4.3 million gain.
We offer insurance services through Miller Loughry Beach Insurance and Services, Inc.. On July 2,
2008, we announced the merger of Murfreesboro, Tenn.-based Beach & Gentry Insurance LLC (Beach &
Gentry). Beach & Gentry merged with Miller &
Loughry Insurance Services Inc. As a result, insurance sales commissions increased between the
first quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009.
Included in other noninterest income are miscellaneous consumer fees, such as ATM revenues,
merchant card and other electronic banking revenues. We experienced a significant increase in
these revenues in 2009 compared to 2008 due primarily to increased volumes from new customers.
Page 28
Additionally, noninterest income from the cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance
decreased between the first three months of 2009 and the first three months of 2008. The assets
that support these policies are administered by the bank-owned life insurance carriers and the
income we receive (i.e., increases or decreases in the cash surrender value of the policies) on
these policies is dependent upon the returns the insurance carriers are able to earn on the
underlying investments that support the policies. With the national recession, the policy
investment returns have underperformed. We anticipate that such underperformance will continue
through 2009.
Also included in other noninterest income is $305,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
$183,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 in fees we receive when we originate an interest
rate swap transaction for commercial borrowers and a counterparty interest rate swap transaction
with a third party provider. This amount will fluctuate significantly based on both borrower
demand for this product and the interest rate environment.
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense consists of salaries and employee benefits, equipment and
occupancy expenses, and other operating expenses. The following is the makeup of our noninterest
expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
2009-2008 |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Percent |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
|
|
Noninterest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and employee benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
$ |
8,986 |
|
|
$ |
8,726 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Commissions |
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
-4.9 |
% |
Other compensation, primarily incentives |
|
|
2,362 |
|
|
|
2,110 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
% |
Employee benefits and other |
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
2,394 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
% |
|
|
|
Total compensation and employee benefits |
|
|
14,751 |
|
|
|
13,867 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
|
Equipment and occupancy |
|
|
4,235 |
|
|
|
4,276 |
|
|
|
-1.0 |
% |
Marketing and business development |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
% |
Postage and supplies |
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
% |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
-0.9 |
% |
Other noninterest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate |
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
1,049.2 |
% |
Professional fees |
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
1,209.1 |
% |
Legal, including borrower-related charges |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
-12.7 |
% |
Directors fees |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
101.2 |
% |
Insurance, including FDIC assessments |
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
64.5 |
% |
Contributions |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
75.2 |
% |
Other noninterest expense |
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
-0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
Total other noninterest expense |
|
|
4,228 |
|
|
|
2,452 |
|
|
|
72.4 |
% |
|
|
|
Merger related expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,106 |
|
|
|
-100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
$ |
25,243 |
|
|
$ |
25,491 |
|
|
|
-1.0 |
% |
|
|
|
Expenses have generally increased between the above periods due to personnel additions occurring
throughout each period, the continued development of our branch network and other expenses which
increase in relation to our growth rate. We anticipate continued increases in our expenses in the
future for such items as additional personnel, the opening of additional branches, audit expenses
and other expenses which tend to increase in relation to our growth.
At March 31, 2009, we employed 736.0 full-time equivalent employees compared to 686.0 at March 31,
2008. We intend to continue to add employees to our work force for the foreseeable future, which
will cause our salary and employee benefits costs to increase in future periods.
We believe that variable pay incentives are a valuable tool in motivating an employee base that is
focused on providing our clients effective financial advice and increasing shareholder value. As a
result, and unlike many other financial institutions, all of our non-
Page 29
commissioned employees are eligible to participate in an annual cash incentive plan. Under the
plan, the targeted level of incentive payments requires the Company to achieve a certain soundness
threshold and a targeted earnings per share. To the extent that actual earnings per share are
above or below targeted earnings per share, the aggregate incentive payments are increased or
decreased. Additionally, our Human Resources and Compensation Committee (the Committee) of the
Board of Directors has the ability to change the parameters of the variable cash award at any time
prior to final distribution of the awards in order to take into account current events and
circumstances and maximize the benefit of the awards to our firm and to the associates.
Included in the salary and employee benefits amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008, were $1,071,000 and $1,486,000, respectively, related to variable cash awards. This expense
will fluctuate from year to year and quarter to quarter based on the estimation of achievement of
performance targets and the increase in the number of associates eligible to receive the award.
Based on our internal earnings forecast for 2009, for the three months ended March 31, 2009, we
have anticipated a cash award to qualifying associates equal to approximately 60% of their targeted
award and consequently we have recorded the quarterly portion of incentive expense assuming 60% of
the targeted award. We have accrued for no cash incentives at March 31, 2009 for the five highest
paid executive officers based on the uncertainty created by recently enacted legislation related to
our participation in the CPP. We will continue to review our anticipated 2009 performance, our
participation in the CPP and applicable legislation throughout 2009 which may require us to
increase or decrease the anticipated award above or below the first quarter accrual rate. Included
in merger related expense for the first quarter of 2008 are incentive payments made to certain
executives, including Pinnacle Financials named executive officers, pursuant to a special
incentive plan approved by the Committee for
achievement of predetermined targets in association with the Mid-America
acquisition.
Additionally,
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
approximately $875,000 and $482,000, respectively, of compensation
expense related to stock options and restricted share awards is
included in other incentive compensation expense.
Marketing and other business development and postage and supplies expenses are higher in 2009
compared to 2008 due to increases in the number of customers and prospective customers; increases
in the number of customer contact personnel and the corresponding increases in customer
entertainment; and other business development expenses.
Included in noninterest expense for the first quarter of 2009 and 2008 is $759,000 and $766,000,
respectively, of amortization of intangibles related primarily to the Mid-America and Cavalry
mergers. For Mid-America, this identified intangible is being amortized over ten years using an
accelerated method which anticipates the life of the underlying deposits to which the intangible is
attributable. For Cavalry, this identified intangible is being amortized over seven years using an
accelerated method which anticipates the life of the underlying deposits to which the intangible is
attributable. Additionally, in connection with our acquisition of Beach and Gentry in July of
2008, we recorded a customer list intangible of $1,270,000 which is being amortized over 20 years
on an accelerated basis. Amortization of this intangible amounted to $30,000 during the three
months ended March 31, 2009.
Other noninterest expenses increased 72.4% in the first quarter of 2009 when compared to 2008.
Most of these increases are attributable to increased other real estate, professional fees, and FDIC insurance premiums. Recently, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC) finalized its deposit insurance assessment rates for 2009. As a result of the
requirement to increase the FDICs Bank Insurance Fund to statutory levels over a prescribed period
of time and increased pressure on the funds reserves due to the increasing number of bank
failures, FDIC insurance costs for 2009 will be significantly higher for all insured depository
institutions. We anticipate our insurance costs to increase 100% in 2009 as our deposit assessment
rate will increase from approximately 5 basis points of our deposits to approximately 10 basis
points. We also anticipate in the second quarter of 2009 a special one-time assessment from the
FDIC of approximately $3.5 million to provide additional reserves for the Bank Insurance Fund.
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, we incurred approximately $3.1 million in merger
related expenses, primarily related to retention bonuses and accruals, in connection with our
merger with Mid-America Bancshares, Inc. which was acquired during 2007. We do not anticipate any
merger related expenses in connection with this acquisition during 2009.
Our efficiency ratio (ratio of noninterest expense to the sum of net interest income and
noninterest income) was 60.3% for the first quarter of 2009 compared to 71.4% in the first quarter
2008. The efficiency ratio measures the amount of expense that is incurred to generate a dollar of
revenue.
Financial Condition
Our consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2009 reflects organic growth since December 31, 2008.
Total assets grew to $4.95 billion at March 31, 2009 from $4.75 billion at December 31, 2008, an
increase of 4.2%.
Page 30
Loans. The composition of loans at March 31, 2009 and at December 31, 2008 and the percentage (%)
of each classification to total loans are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|
|
Commercial real estate Mortgage |
|
$ |
1,010,309 |
|
|
|
29.1 |
% |
|
$ |
963,530 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
% |
Consumer real estate Mortgage |
|
|
710,267 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
% |
|
|
675,606 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
% |
Construction and land development |
|
|
674,398 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
658,799 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
% |
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
968,126 |
|
|
|
27.9 |
% |
|
|
966,563 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
% |
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
110,859 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
90,409 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
3,473,959 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
3,354,907 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
Although the allocation of our loan portfolio did not change significantly during the three months
ended March 31, 2009 when compared to December 31, 2008, we did experience an increase of 0.40% in
the commercial real estate classification. We continue to have loan demand for our commercial real
estate and construction lending products, and we will continue to pursue sound, prudently
underwritten real estate lending opportunities. Because these types of loans require that we
maintain effective credit and construction monitoring systems, we have increased our resources in
this area. We believe we can effectively manage this area of exposure due to our strategic focus
of hiring experienced professionals who are well-trained in this type of lending and who have
significant experience in our geographic market.
We periodically analyze our commercial loan portfolio to determine if a concentration of credit
risk exists to any one or more industries. We use broadly accepted industry classification systems
in order to classify borrowers into various industry classifications. As a result, we have a
credit exposure (loans outstanding plus unfunded commitments) exceeding 25% of Pinnacle Nationals
total risk-based capital to borrowers in the following industries at March 31, 2009 and December
31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Principal |
|
Unfunded |
|
Total |
|
Total Exposure at |
|
|
Balances |
|
Commitments |
|
exposure |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lessors of nonresidential buildings |
|
$ |
365,968 |
|
|
$ |
62,153 |
|
|
$ |
428,121 |
|
|
$ |
406,798 |
|
Lessors of residential buildings |
|
|
139,386 |
|
|
|
19,211 |
|
|
|
158,597 |
|
|
|
159,261 |
|
Land subdividers |
|
|
227,336 |
|
|
|
68,145 |
|
|
|
295,481 |
|
|
|
319,701 |
|
New housing operative builders |
|
|
199,999 |
|
|
|
52,834 |
|
|
|
252,833 |
|
|
|
261,625 |
|
The following table classifies our fixed and variable rate loans at March 31, 2009 according to
contractual maturities of (1) one year or less, (2) after one year through five years, and (3)
after five years. The table also classifies our variable rate loans pursuant to the contractual
repricing dates of the underlying loans (dollars in thousands):
Page 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
Variable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, |
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
Rates |
|
|
Rates |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
Based on contractual maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year |
|
$ |
225,147 |
|
|
$ |
1,071,270 |
|
|
$ |
1,296,417 |
|
|
|
37.3 |
% |
|
|
40.9 |
% |
Due in one year to five years |
|
|
832,032 |
|
|
|
641,922 |
|
|
|
1,473,954 |
|
|
|
42.4 |
% |
|
|
38.9 |
% |
Due after five years |
|
|
135,427 |
|
|
|
568,161 |
|
|
|
703,588 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
% |
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
1,192,606 |
|
|
$ |
2,281,353 |
|
|
$ |
3,473,959 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on contractual repricing dates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily floating rate |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,444,598 |
|
|
$ |
1,444,598 |
|
|
|
41.6 |
% |
|
|
41.8 |
% |
Due within one year |
|
|
225,147 |
|
|
|
711,084 |
|
|
|
936,231 |
|
|
|
26.9 |
% |
|
|
25.3 |
% |
Due in one year to five years |
|
|
832,032 |
|
|
|
116,162 |
|
|
|
948,194 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
28.3 |
% |
Due after five years |
|
|
135,427 |
|
|
|
9,509 |
|
|
|
144,936 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
1,192,606 |
|
|
$ |
2,281,353 |
|
|
$ |
3,473,959 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above information does not consider the impact of scheduled principal payments. Daily floating
rate loans are tied to Pinnacle Nationals prime lending rate or a national interest rate index
with the underlying loan rates changing in relation to changes in these indexes. |
Non-Performing Assets. The specific economic and credit risks associated with our loan portfolio
include, but are not limited to the impact of recessionary economic conditions on our borrowers
cash flows, real estate market sales volumes and valuations, real estate industry concentrations,
deterioration in certain large credits, interest rate fluctuations, reduced collateral values or
non-existent collateral, title defects, inaccurate appraisals, financial deterioration of
borrowers, fraud, and any violation of laws and regulations.
We attempt to reduce these economic and credit risks by adherence to loan to value guidelines for
collateralized loans, by investigating the creditworthiness of the borrower and by monitoring the
borrowers financial position. Also, we establish and periodically review our lending policies and
procedures. Banking regulations limit our exposure by prohibiting loan relationships that exceed
15% of Pinnacle Nationals statutory capital in the case of loans that are not fully secured by
readily marketable or other permissible types of collateral which would approximate $65 million.
Furthermore, we have an internal limit for aggregate credit exposure (loans outstanding plus
unfunded commitments) to a single borrower of $22 million. Our loan policy requires that our
Executive Committee to the board of directors approve any relationships that exceed this internal
limit.
At March 31, 2009 we had $53.7 million in nonperforming assets compared to $29.2 million at
December 31, 2008, an 84.0% increase. Included in nonperforming assets were $33.9 million in
nonperforming loans at March 31, 2009 and $10.9 million at
December 31, 2008. The increase in
non-performing asset balances that Pinnacle Financial experienced in the quarter ended March 31,
2009 is primarily related to a weakened residential real estate market in Pinnacle Financials
market areas. Within this segment of the loan portfolio, Pinnacle Financial makes loans to home
builders and developers and sub-dividers of land. These borrowers have continued to experience
stress due to a combination of declining residential real estate demand and resulting price and
collateral value declines in Pinnacle Financials market areas. Further, housing starts in
Pinnacle Financials market areas continue to slow.
The Greater Nashville Association of Realtors (GNAR) reported that the average median residential
home price for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 was $161,000, a decrease of 8.2% from the same
quarter a year earlier. GNAR also reported that the number of residential inventory at March 31,
2009 was 14,528 homes, a decrease of 3.6% from a year earlier. These statistics represent a
generally weaker housing market than a year earlier. Median home prices have fallen
indicates that home values have decreased. Although fewer homes for sale could be considered a
positive in this market, it also indicates that fewer home owners are willing to consider selling
their home and subsequently acquire another home. An extended recessionary period will likely
cause our construction and land development loans to continue to underperform and our nonperforming
assets and loan losses to continue to increase. We believe our nonperforming asset levels will
remain elevated for at least the next several quarters as we work diligently to remediate these
assets.
We discontinue the accrual of interest income when (1) there is a significant deterioration in the
financial condition of the borrower and full repayment of principal and interest is not expected or
(2) the principal or interest is more than 90 days past due, unless the loan is both well-secured
and in the process of collection. At March 31, 2009, we had $33.9 million in loans on nonaccrual
compared to $10.9 million at December 31, 2008, of which $24.5 million and $5.1 million,
respectively, were residential construction and land development loans.
All non-accruing loans are reviewed by and, in many cases, reassigned to a senior officer of the
Company that was not the individual responsible for originating the loan. If the loan is
reassigned, the senior officer is responsible for developing an action plan designed to minimize
any future losses that may accrue to the Company. Typically, these senior officers review the
Companys loan files, interview past loan officers assigned to the relationship, meet with
borrowers, inspect collateral, reappraise collateral and/or consult with legal counsel. The senior
officer then recommends an action plan to a committee of senior associates including lenders and
workout specialists, which could include foreclosure, restructuring the loan, issuing demand
letters or other actions. The table below represents the classifications of our nonperforming
loans (dollars in thousands):
Page 32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Commercial real estate Mortgage |
|
$ |
3,859 |
|
|
$ |
1,566 |
|
Consumer real estate Mortgage |
|
|
7,247 |
|
|
|
3,140 |
|
Construction and land development |
|
|
18,960 |
|
|
|
5,016 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
3,538 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
33,863 |
|
|
$ |
10,860 |
|
|
|
|
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we placed several relationships on nonaccrual status;
however the three largest nonperforming loans at March 31, 2009 were $9.5 million in loans to a
real estate developer/builder of both commercial and residential projects, $4.8 million in loans to
a developer of several residential developments and $4.5 million in loans to a real estate
investor. All of these credits are located in Middle Tennessee. A significant contributor to the
nonperforming loan increase was a weaker housing sector. Although we believe the dislocations in
the Nashville and Knoxville housing sectors have not been as severe as many other areas of our
country, we have noted weakness with respect to several specific clients who focus on residential
construction and residential land development within our trade areas.
We have enhanced our credit administration resources dedicated to the residential construction and
residential development portfolios by assigning senior executives and bankers to these portfolios.
These individuals meet frequently to discuss the performance of the portfolio and specific
relationships with emphasis on the underperforming assets. Their objective is to identify
relationships that warrant continued support and remediate those relationships that will tend to
cause our portfolio to underperform over the long term. We have reappraised many nonperforming
assets to ascertain appropriate valuations, and we continue to systematically review these
valuations as new data is received.
At March 31, 2009, we owned $19.8 million in real estate which we had acquired, usually through
foreclosure, from borrowers compared to $18.3 million at December 31, 2008. Substantially all of
these amounts relate to new home construction and residential development projects that are either
completed or are in various stages of construction for which we believe we have adequate
collateral. Approximately 98.0% of these assets are located within the Nashville MSA.
There were $3.9 million of other loans 90 days past due and still accruing interest at March 31,
2009 compared to $1.5 million at December 31, 2008. At March 31, 2009 and at December 31, 2008, no
loans were deemed to be restructured loans.
The following table is a summary of our nonperforming assets at March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, |
|
At December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans (1) |
|
$ |
33,863 |
|
|
$ |
10,860 |
|
Restructured loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
19,817 |
|
|
|
18,306 |
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
|
53,680 |
|
|
|
29,166 |
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more |
|
|
3,871 |
|
|
|
1,508 |
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets and accruing loans past due 90 days or more |
|
$ |
57,551 |
|
|
$ |
30,674 |
|
|
|
|
Total loans outstanding |
|
$ |
3,473,959 |
|
|
$ |
3,354,907 |
|
|
|
|
Ratio of nonperforming assets and accruing loans past due 90 days or
more to total loans outstanding at end of period |
|
|
1.66 |
% |
|
|
0.91 |
% |
|
|
|
Ratio of nonperforming assets and accruing loans past due 90 days or
more to total allowance for loan losses at end of period |
|
|
126.95 |
% |
|
|
84.08 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest income that would have been recorded during the three months ended March 31,
2009 related to nonaccrual loans was $690,000. |
Page 33
Potential Problem Loans. Potential problem loans, which are not included in nonperforming assets,
amounted to approximately $88.9 million or 2.59% of total loans and other real estate at March 31,
2009 compared to $27.8 million or 0.83% at December 31, 2008. Potential problem loans represent
those loans with a well-defined weakness and where information about possible credit problems of
borrowers has caused management to have serious doubts about the borrowers ability to comply with
present repayment terms. This definition is believed to be substantially consistent with the
standards established by the OCC, Pinnacle Nationals primary regulator, for loans classified as
substandard, excluding the impact of nonperforming loans. The large increase in potential problem
loans was caused by the downgrade of additional residential construction and development loans and
one $21.5 million loan to a one-bank holding company. That holding company and its bank subsidiary
are undergoing increased regulatory scrutiny and are subject to a requirement to raise additional
capital. During the first quarter of 2009 this $21.5 million loan was downgraded from criticized
status to substandard status. The loan was due on March 31, 2009, and only interest was paid at
that date. We believe payment of this loan will be dependent on a successful recapitalization of
the borrower, and that while the borrower has made progress toward that end, its success cannot be
assured at this time. Although at March 31, 2009, we believed we were
adequately collateralized and that the borrower had initiated steps
to cure its capital issues, the failure by the borrower and its bank subsidiary to raise sufficient
capital and comply with regulatory restrictions could require further downgrades, a re-evaluation
of our collateral, and the charge-off or restructure of some or all of this loan.
In addition to potential problem loans, criticized loans are those loans with above-average
weakness as identified by our internal loan review processes. These are loans in varying stages of
review by our officers with the review objective being to determine whether there is a well-defined
weakness, which would require a downgrade to a potential problem loan or a nonperforming loan, or
whether the credit weakness is stable or improving which would warrant a continued criticized loan
grade or an upgrade to a passing credit grade. Typically, all criticized loans are performing
loans and are thus not impaired. At March 31, 2009, approximately $54.6 million, or 1.6% of total
loans outstanding, were criticized loans, as compared to $78.4 million, or 2.34% of total loans at
December 31, 2008.
Allowance for Loan Losses (allowance). We maintain the allowance at a level that our management
deems appropriate to adequately cover the probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. As of
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, our allowance for loan losses was $45.3 million and $36.5
million, respectively, which our management deemed to be adequate at each of the respective dates.
The judgments and estimates associated with our allowance determination are described under
Critical Accounting Estimates above.
The following is a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the ratio of the allowance for loan
losses to total loans as of the end of each period (dollars in thousands):
Page 34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Year ended |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
36,484 |
|
|
$ |
28,470 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
13,610 |
|
|
|
11,214 |
|
Charged-off loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate Mortgage |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
Consumer real estate Mortgage |
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
(1,144 |
) |
Construction and land development |
|
|
(1,014 |
) |
|
|
(2,172 |
) |
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
(2,531 |
) |
|
|
(773 |
) |
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
(345 |
) |
|
|
(982 |
) |
|
|
|
Total charged-off loans |
|
|
(4,853 |
) |
|
|
(5,133 |
) |
|
|
|
Recoveries of previously charged-off loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate Mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
731 |
|
Consumer real estate Mortgage |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Construction and land development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries of previously charged-off loans |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs) recoveries |
|
|
(4,760 |
) |
|
|
(3,200 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
45,334 |
|
|
$ |
36,484 |
|
|
|
|
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans outstanding at end of period |
|
|
1.30 |
% |
|
|
1.09 |
% |
|
|
|
Ratio of net charge-offs (*) to average loans outstanding for the period |
|
|
0.56 |
% |
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Net charge-offs for the three months ended March 31, 2009 have been annualized. |
As noted in our critical accounting policies, management assesses the adequacy of the allowance
prior to the end of each calendar quarter. This assessment includes procedures to estimate the
allowance and test the adequacy and appropriateness of the resulting balance. The level of the
allowance is based upon managements evaluation of the loan portfolios, past loan loss experience,
known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers
ability to repay (including the timing of future payment), the estimated value of any underlying
collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, economic conditions, industry and peer bank loan
quality indications and other pertinent factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it
requires material estimates including the value of collateral and the amounts and timing of future
cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans that may be susceptible to significant change.
The allowance increased by $8.9 million between March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and the ratio
of our allowance for loan losses to total loans outstanding increased to 1.30% at March 31, 2009
from 1.09% at December 31, 2008. The significant increase in nonperforming loans and net-charge
offs during the first three months of 2009 were the primary reasons for the increase in the
allowance for loan losses in 2009 when compared to 2008.
Investments. Our investment portfolio, consisting primarily of Federal agency bonds, state and
municipal securities and mortgage-backed securities, amounted to $868.5 million and $849.8 million
at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Our investment portfolio serves many
purposes including serving as a stable source of income, collateral for public funds and as a
potential liquidity source. A summary of our investment portfolio at March 31, 2009 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
Weighted average life |
|
2.47 years |
Weighted average coupon |
|
|
5.37 |
% |
Tax equivalent yield |
|
|
5.24 |
% |
Deposits and Other Borrowings. We had approximately $3.75 billion of deposits at March 31, 2009
compared to $3.53 billion at December 31, 2008. Our deposits consist of noninterest and
interest-bearing demand accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts and time deposits.
Additionally, we entered into agreements with certain customers to sell certain securities under
agreements to repurchase the security the following day. These agreements (which are typically
associated with comprehensive
Page 35
treasury management programs for our clients and provide them with short-term returns for their
excess funds) amounted to $209.6 million at March 31, 2009 and $184.3 million at December 31, 2008.
Additionally, at March 31, 2009, we had borrowed $203.6 million in advances from the Federal Home
Loan Bank of Cincinnati compared to $183.3 million at December 31, 2008.
Generally, we have classified our funding base as either core funding or non-core funding. Core
funding consists of all deposits other than time deposits issued in denominations of $100,000 or
greater. All other funding is deemed to be non-core. The following table represents the balances
of our deposits and other fundings and the percentage of each type to the total at March 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Percent |
|
2008 |
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core funding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposit accounts |
|
$ |
451,418 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
$ |
424,757 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing demand accounts |
|
|
380,384 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
375,993 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Savings and money market accounts |
|
|
717,265 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
% |
|
|
694,582 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Time deposit accounts less than $100,000 |
|
|
449,357 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
570,443 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core funding |
|
|
1,998,424 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
% |
|
|
2,065,775 |
|
|
|
50.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-core funding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relationship based non-core funding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposit accounts greater than $100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reciprocating time deposits |
|
|
218,019 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
36,924 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Other time deposits |
|
|
593,357 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
|
306,138 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
209,591 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
184,298 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total relationship based non-core funding |
|
|
1,020,967 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
% |
|
|
527,360 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale funding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposit accounts greater than $100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public funds |
|
|
300,407 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
538,809 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Brokered deposits |
|
|
640,752 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
585,599 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Federal Home
Loan Bank advances, Federal
funds purchased and other borrowings |
|
|
222,039 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
273,609 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debt Pinnacle National |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debt Pinnacle Financial |
|
|
82,476 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
82,476 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total wholesale funding |
|
|
1,260,674 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
% |
|
|
1,495,493 |
|
|
|
36.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-core funding |
|
|
2,281,641 |
|
|
|
53.3 |
% |
|
|
2,022,853 |
|
|
|
49.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
4,280,065 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
4,088,628 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our funding policies limit the amount of non-core funding we can use to support our growth. As
noted in the table above, our core funding decreased from 50.5% at December 31, 2008 to 46.7% at
March 31, 2009. The decrease in core funding which occurred during the three months ended March
31, 2009 was caused we believe by the cyclical decline in core funding that regularly occurs during
the first quarter and thus requires a temporary, greater reliance on other non-core funding
sources. The reciprocating time deposit category consists of deposits we receive from a bank
network (the CDARS network) in connection with deposits of our customers in excess of our FDIC
coverage limit that we place with the CDARS network. With the temporary increase in FDIC coverage
from $100,000 to $250,000, the CDARS network which manages the reciprocating time deposit programs
began placing funds in time deposits greater than $100,000 increments, thus elevating the amount of
time deposits above the $100,000 core threshold. In addition, the temporary insurance limit
increase resulted in a significant increase in time deposits of our customers between $100,000 and
the new insurance limits. Although growing our core deposit base is a key strategic objective of
our firm, we believe that our dependence on non-core funding will increase, but remain within our
policies, as we continue to fund the rapid growth of our loan portfolio.
The amount of time deposits as of March 31, 2009 amounted to $2.2 billion. The following table
shows our time deposits in denominations of under $100,000 and those of denominations of $100,000
or greater by category based on time remaining until maturity of (1) three months or less, (2) over
three but less than six months, (3) over six but less than twelve months and (4) over twelve months
and the weighted average rate for each category (dollars in thousands):
Page 36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances |
|
Weighted Avg. Rate |
Denominations less than $100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months or less |
|
$ |
289,235 |
|
|
|
1.99 |
% |
Over three but less than six months |
|
|
123,016 |
|
|
|
2.77 |
% |
Over six but less than twelve months |
|
|
194,260 |
|
|
|
2.98 |
% |
Over twelve months |
|
|
60,629 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
667,140 |
|
|
|
2.56 |
% |
|
|
|
Denomination $100,000 and greater |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months or less |
|
|
684,939 |
|
|
|
1.87 |
% |
Over three but less than six months |
|
|
373,408 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
% |
Over six but less than twelve months |
|
|
347,182 |
|
|
|
3.33 |
% |
Over twelve months |
|
|
129,221 |
|
|
|
3.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,534,750 |
|
|
|
2.61 |
% |
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
2,201,890 |
|
|
|
2.60 |
% |
|
|
|
Subordinated
debt and other borrowings. On December 29, 2003, we established PNFP Statutory Trust I; on September 15,
2005 we established PNFP Statutory Trust II; on September 7, 2006 we established PNFP Statutory
Trust III and on October 31, 2007 we established PNFP Statutory Trust IV (Trust I; Trust II;
Trust III, Trust IV or collectively, the Trusts). All are wholly-owned Pinnacle Financial
subsidiaries that are statutory business trusts. We are the sole sponsor of the Trusts and acquired
each Trusts common securities for $310,000; $619,000; $619,000, and $928,000, respectively. The
Trusts were created for the exclusive purpose of issuing 30-year capital trust preferred securities
(Trust Preferred Securities) in the aggregate amount of $10,000,000 for Trust I; $20,000,000 for
Trust II; $20,000,000 for Trust III, and $30,000,000 for Trust IV and using the proceeds to acquire
junior subordinated debentures (Subordinated Debentures) issued by Pinnacle Financial. The sole
assets of the Trusts are the Subordinated Debentures. At March 31, 2009, our $2,476,000 investment
in the Trusts is included in investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets and our $82,476,000 obligation is reflected as subordinated debt.
The Trust I Preferred Securities bear a floating interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR
(4.116% at March 31, 2009) which is set each quarter and matures on December 30, 2033. The Trust
II Preferred Securities bear a fixed interest rate of 5.848% per annum thru September 30, 2010
after which time the securities will bear a floating rate set each quarter based on a spread over
3-month LIBOR. The Trust II securities mature on September 30, 2035. The Trust III Preferred
Securities bear a floating interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR (2.870% at March 31,
2009) which is set each quarter and mature on September 30, 2036. The Trust IV Preferred
Securities bear a floating interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR (4.170% at March 31,
2009) which is set each quarter and matures on September 30, 2037.
Distributions are payable quarterly. The Trust Preferred Securities are subject to mandatory
redemption upon repayment of the Subordinated Debentures at their stated maturity date or their
earlier redemption in an amount equal to their liquidation amount plus accumulated and unpaid
distributions to the date of redemption. We guarantee the payment of distributions and payments
for redemption or liquidation of the Trust Preferred Securities to the extent of funds held by the
Trusts. Pinnacle Financials obligations under the Subordinated Debentures together with the
guarantee and other back-up obligations, in the aggregate, constitute a full and unconditional
guarantee by Pinnacle Financial of the obligations of the Trusts under the Trust Preferred
Securities.
The Subordinated Debentures are unsecured; bear interest at a rate equal to the rates paid by the
Trusts on the Trust Preferred Securities; and mature on the same dates as those noted above for the
Trust Preferred Securities. Interest is payable quarterly. We may defer the payment of interest
at any time for a period not exceeding 20 consecutive quarters provided that the deferral period
does not extend past the stated maturity. During any such deferral period, distributions on the
Trust Preferred Securities will also be deferred and our ability to pay dividends on our common
shares will be restricted.
Subject to approval by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and the limitations on repurchase
resulting from Pinnacle Financials participation in the CPP, the Trust Preferred Securities may be
redeemed subject to the limitations imposed under the CPP prior to maturity at our option on or
after September 17, 2008 for Trust I; on or after September 30, 2010 for Trust II; September 30,
2011 for Trust III and September 30, 2012 for Trust IV. The Trust Preferred Securities may also be
redeemed at any time subject to the CPP restrictions in whole (but not in part) in the event of
unfavorable changes in laws or regulations that result in (1) the Trust becoming subject to federal
income tax on income received on the Subordinated Debentures, (2) interest payable by the parent
company on the Subordinated Debentures becoming non-deductible for Federal tax purposes, (3) the
requirement for the Trust to register under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or (4)
loss of the ability to treat the Trust Preferred Securities as Tier I capital under the Federal
Reserve capital adequacy guidelines.
The Trust Preferred Securities for the Trusts qualify as Tier I capital under current regulatory
definitions subject to certain limitations. Debt issuance costs associated with Trust I of
$120,000 consisting primarily of underwriting discounts and professional
Page 37
fees are included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. These debt
issuance costs are being amortized over ten years using the straight-line method. There were no
debt issuance costs associated with Trust II, Trust III or Trust IV.
At March 31, 2009, we had a loan agreement related to a $25 million line of credit with a regional
bank. This line of credit is used to support the growth of Pinnacle National. The balance owed
pursuant to this line of credit at March 31, 2009 was $18 million. The line of credit has a one
year term, contains customary affirmative and negative covenants regarding the operation of our
business, a negative pledge on the common stock of Pinnacle National and is priced at 30-day LIBOR
plus 200 basis points. As of March 31, 2009, we were in violation of the covenant limiting the
amount of nonperforming assets we could have at any quarterly reporting date. On April 23, 2009,
we received a waiver of this covenant violation from the lender. We expect to renegotiate our
covenants in this agreement during the second quarter of 2009 and that the line of credit will
remain in place. However, should we not be able to successfully renegotiate this line of credit
with our lender, we intend to repay the indebtedness in full. At this time, our holding company
has cash available to repay this note in full
On August 5, 2008, Pinnacle National also entered into a $15 million subordinated term loan with a
regional bank. The loan bears interest at three month LIBOR plus 3.5%, matures in 2015 and
qualifies as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes until 2010 and at a decreasing
percentage each year thereafter. This additional bank level capital has been utilized to support
our growth.
Capital Resources. At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, our stockholders equity amounted to
$631.6 million and $627.3 million, respectively. This increase was primarily attributable to $3.7
million increase in comprehensive income, which was composed of $2.1 in net income together with
$1.6 million of net unrealized holding gains associated with our available-for-sale portfolio.
On December 12, 2008, we issued 95,000 shares of preferred stock to the U.S. Treasury for $95
million pursuant to the CPP. Additionally, we issued 534,910 common stock warrants to the U.S.
Treasury as a condition to our participation in the CPP. The warrants have an exercise price of
$26.64 each, are immediately exercisable and expire 10 years from the date of issuance. The
accrued dividend costs and the accretion of the discount recorded on the preferred stock totaled
$1.45 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2009. Proceeds from this sale of preferred stock
are expected to be used for general corporate purposes, including supporting the continued,
anticipated growth of Pinnacle National.
The Series A preferred stock sold pursuant to the CPP is non-voting, other than having class voting
rights on certain matters, and pays cumulative dividends quarterly at a rate of 5 percent per annum
for the first five years and 9 percent thereafter. The preferred shares are only redeemable at our
option under certain circumstances during the first three years and are redeemable thereafter
without restriction. As a result of our participation in CPP, our capital ratios have been further
enhanced.
There is much publicity regarding banks redeeming their CPP preferred stock by repaying the U.S.
Treasury. We continue to consider redemption of the preferred stock issued by us in the CPP. We
believe several significant items will need to be accomplished before we redeem the preferred
stock. We will need to consider the implications of redemption of the preferred stock on our
future growth plans. We currently anticipate that redemption of the CPP preferred stock would
require supplemental capital of some form most likely a common stock issuance.
Additionally, we will need to gain more clarity on the length and
depth of the current credit cycle,
particularly as it relates to our loan portfolio and specifically the health of our residential
construction and land development credits and the large financial institution loan described above.
Also, in order to redeem the CPP preferred stock we will need to obtain regulatory approval.
At March 31, 2009, our Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 11.8 percent, or total risk-based
capital was 13.3 percent and our leverage ratio was 9.7 percent, compared to 12.1 percent, 13.5
percent and 10.5 percent at December 31, 2008, respectively.
Dividends. Pinnacle National is subject to restrictions on the payment of dividends to Pinnacle
Financial under federal banking laws and the regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, Pinnacle National paid $2.4 million in
dividends to Pinnacle Financial. Pinnacle Financial is subject to limits on payment of dividends
to its shareholders by the rules, regulations and policies of Federal banking authorities, the laws
of the State of Tennessee and as a result of its participation in the CPP (as more fully discussed
above and in Pinnacle Financials Annual Report on Form 10-K). Pinnacle Financial has not paid any
dividends to date, nor does it anticipate paying dividends to its shareholders for the foreseeable
future. Future dividend policy will depend on Pinnacle Financials earnings, capital position,
financial condition and other factors.
Market and Liquidity Risk Management
Our objective is to manage assets and liabilities to provide a satisfactory, consistent level of
profitability within the framework of established liquidity, loan, investment, borrowing, and
capital policies. Our Asset Liability Management Committee (ALCO) is charged with the
responsibility of monitoring these policies, which are designed to ensure acceptable composition of
asset/liability mix. Two critical areas of focus for ALCO are interest rate sensitivity and
liquidity risk management.
Page 38
Interest Rate Sensitivity. In the normal course of business, we are exposed to market risk arising
from fluctuations in interest rates. ALCO measures and evaluates the interest rate risk so that we
can meet customer demands for various types of loans and deposits. ALCO determines the most
appropriate amounts of on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet items. Measurements which we use to
help us manage interest rate sensitivity include an earnings simulation model and an economic value
of equity model. These measurements are used in conjunction with competitive pricing analysis.
Earnings simulation model. We believe that interest rate risk is best measured by our
earnings simulation modeling. Forecasted levels of earning assets, interest-bearing
liabilities, and off-balance sheet financial instruments are combined with ALCO forecasts
of interest rates for the next 12 months and are combined with other factors in order to
produce various earnings simulations. To limit interest rate risk, we have guidelines for
our earnings at risk which seek to limit the variance of net interest income to less than a
20 percent decline for a gradual 300 basis point change up or down in rates from
managements flat interest rate forecast over the next twelve months; to less than a 10
percent decline for a gradual 200 basis point change up or down in rates from managements
flat interest rate forecast over the next twelve months; and to less than a 5 percent
decline for a gradual 100 basis point change up or down in rates from managements flat
interest rate forecast over the next twelve months.
Economic value of equity. Our economic value of equity model measures the extent that
estimated economic values of our assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items will
change as a result of interest rate changes. Economic values are determined by discounting
expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items, which establishes
a base case economic value of equity. To help limit interest rate risk, we have a
guideline stating that for an instantaneous 300 basis point change in interest rates up or
down, the economic value of equity should not decrease by more than 30 percent from the
base case; for a 200 basis point instantaneous change in interest rates up or down, the
economic value of equity should not decrease by more than 20 percent; and for a 100 basis
point instantaneous change in interest rates up or down, the economic value of equity
should not decrease by more than 10 percent.
At March 31, 2009, our model results indicate that we remain asset-sensitive. Asset sensitivity
implies that our assets will reprice faster than our liabilities. As a result, an interest rate
increase should be beneficial to us as our asset yields would increase at a more rapid rate than
the costs of our liabilities. This asset sensitivity is primarily attributable to the absolute low
level of rates in the current economic cycle. Our deposit rates are difficult to lower as we have
achieved, for many deposit products, embedded floors, which basically means that we either are
near a zero interest level or competitive pressures do not allow for any meaningful decreases. Due
to the absolute low level of rates, we periodically operate outside of our guidelines for interest
rate sensitivity and economic value of equity on a few of the rates down interest rate scenarios.
Each of the above analyses may not, on its own, be an accurate indicator of how our net interest
income will be affected by changes in interest rates. Income associated with interest-earning
assets and costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities may not be affected uniformly by
changes in interest rates. In addition, the magnitude and duration of changes in interest rates
may have a significant impact on net interest income. For example, although certain assets and
liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of repricing, they may react in different
degrees to changes in market interest rates. Interest rates on certain types of assets and
liabilities fluctuate in advance of changes in general market rates, while interest rates on other
types may lag behind changes in general market rates. In addition, certain assets, such as
adjustable rate mortgage loans, have features (generally referred to as interest rate caps and
floors) which limit changes in interest rates. Prepayment and early withdrawal levels also could
deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the maturity of certain instruments. The
ability of many borrowers to service their debts also may decrease during periods of rising
interest rates. ALCO reviews each of the above interest rate sensitivity analyses along with
several different interest rate scenarios as part of its responsibility to provide a satisfactory,
consistent level of profitability within the framework of established liquidity, loan, investment,
borrowing, and capital policies. At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had not entered into
any derivative contracts to assist managing our interest rate sensitivity.
We may also use derivative financial instruments to improve the balance between interest-sensitive
assets and interest-sensitive liabilities and as one tool to manage our interest rate sensitivity
while continuing to meet the credit and deposit needs of our customers. We periodically enter into
interest rate swaps (swaps) to facilitate customer transactions and meet their financing needs.
These swaps qualify as derivatives, but are not designed as hedging instruments.
Liquidity Risk Management. The purpose of liquidity risk management is to ensure that there are
sufficient cash flows to satisfy loan demand, deposit withdrawals, and our other needs.
Traditional sources of liquidity for a bank include asset maturities and growth in core deposits.
A bank may achieve its desired liquidity objectives from the management of its assets and
liabilities and by internally generated funding through its operations. Funds invested in
marketable instruments that can be readily sold and the continuous maturing of other earning assets
are sources of liquidity from an asset perspective. The liability base provides sources of
liquidity through attraction of increased deposits and borrowing funds from various other
institutions.
Page 39
Changes in interest rates also affect our liquidity position. We currently price deposits in
response to market rates and our management intends to continue this policy. If deposits are not
priced in response to market rates, a loss of deposits could occur which would negatively affect
our liquidity position.
Scheduled loan payments are a relatively stable source of funds, but loan payoffs and deposit flows
fluctuate significantly, being influenced by interest rates, general economic conditions and
competition. Additionally, debt security investments are subject to prepayment and call provisions
that could accelerate their payoff prior to stated maturity. We attempt to price our deposit
products to meet our asset/liability objectives consistent with local market conditions. Our ALCO
is responsible for monitoring our ongoing liquidity needs. Our regulators also monitor our
liquidity and capital resources on a periodic basis.
In addition, Pinnacle National is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati (FHLB).
As a result, Pinnacle National receives advances from the FHLB, pursuant to the terms of various
borrowing agreements, which assist it in the funding of its home mortgage and commercial real
estate loan portfolios. Under the borrowing agreements with the Federal Home Loan Bank of
Cincinnati, Pinnacle National has pledged certain qualifying residential mortgage loans and,
pursuant to a blanket lien, all qualifying commercial mortgage loans as collateral. At March 31,
2009, Pinnacle National had received advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati
totaling $203.6 million at the following rates and maturities (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Interest Rates |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
25,066 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
% |
2010 |
|
|
56,984 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
% |
2011 |
|
|
10,083 |
|
|
|
1.90 |
% |
2012 |
|
|
30,085 |
|
|
|
3.50 |
% |
Thereafter |
|
|
81,425 |
|
|
|
2.85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
203,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle National also has accommodations with upstream correspondent banks for unsecured
short-term advances. These accommodations have various covenants related to their term and
availability, and in most cases must be repaid within less than a month. There was $397,000
outstanding under these agreements at March 31, 2009, and for the three months ended March 31,
2009, we averaged borrowings from correspondent banks of $19.9 million under such agreements.
At March 31, 2009, brokered certificates of deposit approximated $640.7 million which represented
15.0% of total funding compared to $585.6 million and 14.3% at December 31, 2008. We issue these
brokered certificates through several different brokerage houses based on competitive bid.
Typically, these funds are for varying maturities up to two years and are issued at rates which are
competitive to rates we would be required to pay to attract similar deposits from the local market
as well as rates for Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati advances of similar maturities. We
consider these deposits to be a ready source of liquidity under current market conditions.
At March 31, 2009, we had no significant commitments for capital expenditures. However, we are in
the process of developing our branch network or other office facilities in the Nashville MSA and
the Knoxville MSA. As a result, we anticipate that we will enter into contracts to buy property or
construct branch facilities and/or lease agreements to lease facilities in the Nashville MSA and
Knoxville MSA, including entering into agreements to relocate our downtown office facility in
Nashville, Tennessee to a new facility projected to open in 2010.
Our management believes that we have adequate liquidity to meet all known contractual obligations
and unfunded commitments, including loan commitments and reasonable borrower, depositor, and
creditor requirements over the next twelve months.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. At March 31, 2009, we had outstanding standby letters of credit of
$95.3 million and unfunded loan commitments outstanding of $1.0 billion. Because these commitments
generally have fixed expiration dates and many will expire without being drawn upon, the total
commitment level does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. If needed to fund these
outstanding commitments, Pinnacle National has the ability to liquidate Federal funds sold or
securities available-for-sale, or on a short-term basis to borrow and purchase Federal funds from
other financial institutions.
Page 40
Impact of Inflation
The consolidated financial statements and related consolidated financial data presented herein have
been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and practices within
the banking industry which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in
terms of historical dollars without considering the changes in the relative purchasing power of
money over time due to inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all the assets and
liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a
more significant impact on a financial institutions performance than the effects of general levels
of inflation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R, Business Combinations. SFAS 141R clarifies the
definitions of both a business combination and a business. All business combinations will be
accounted for under the acquisition method (previously referred to as the purchase method). This
standard defines the acquisition date as the only relevant date for recognition and measurement of
the fair value of consideration paid. SFAS 141R requires the acquirer to expense all acquisition
related costs. SFAS 141R will also
Page 41
require acquired loans to be recorded net of the allowance for loan losses on the date of
acquisition. SFAS 141R defines the measurement period as the time after the acquisition date during
which the acquirer may make adjustments to the provisional amounts recognized at the acquisition
date. This period cannot exceed one year, and any subsequent adjustments made to provisional
amounts are done retrospectively and restate prior period data. The provisions of this statement
are effective for business combinations during fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.
Pinnacle Financial has not determined the impact that SFAS 141R will have on its financial position
and results of operations and believes that such determination will not be meaningful until
Pinnacle Financial enters into a business combination.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in consolidated financial
statements An Amendment of ARB No. 51. SFAS No. 160 requires noncontrolling interests to be
treated as a separate component of equity, not as a liability or other item outside of equity.
Disclosure requirements include net income and comprehensive income to be displayed for both the
controlling and noncontrolling interests and a separate schedule that shows the effects of any
transactions with the noncontrolling interests on the equity attributable to the controlling
interest. The provisions of this statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2008. This statement should be applied prospectively except for the presentation and disclosure
requirements which shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. Pinnacle Financial
does not expect the impact of SFAS No. 160 on its financial position, results of operations or cash
flows to be material.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 161 (SFAS
161), Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS 161 requires
companies with derivative instruments to disclose information that should enable
financial-statement users to understand how and why a company uses derivative instruments, how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and how derivative instruments and
related hedged items affect a companys financial position, financial performance and cash flows.
SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008. Pinnacle Financial
does not expect the impact of SFAS No. 161 on its financial position, results of operations or cash
flows to be material.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That
Are Not Orderly, provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS
No. 157 when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have decreased
significantly. FSP FAS 157-4 also provides guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a
transaction is not orderly. The provisions of FSP FAS 157-4 are effective for the Companys interim
period ending on June 30, 2009. Management is currently evaluating the effect that the provisions
of FSP FAS 157-4 may have on the Companys statements of income and condition.
In
April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments, requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim
reporting periods of publicly traded companies that were previously only required to be disclosed
in annual financial statements. The provisions of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 are effective for the
Companys interim period ending on June 30, 2009. As FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 amends only the
disclosure requirements about fair value of financial instruments in interim periods, the adoption
of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 is not expected to affect the Companys statements of income and
condition.
In
April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments, amends current other-than-temporary impairment guidance in GAAP
for debt securities to make the guidance more operational and to improve the presentation and
disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial
statements. This FSP does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to
other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities. The provisions of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS
124-2 are effective for the Companys interim period ending on June 30, 2009. Management is
currently evaluating the effect that the provisions of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 may have on the
Companys statements of income and condition.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information required by this Item 3 is included on pages 38 through 40 of Part I Item 2
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Pinnacle Financial maintains disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by it in the reports that it files or submits
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to Pinnacle Financials management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Pinnacle
Financial carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its
management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the
end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of these disclosure controls
and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that Pinnacle
Financials disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Controls
There were no changes in Pinnacle Financials internal control over financial reporting during
Pinnacle Financials fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, Pinnacle Financials internal control over financial
reporting.
Page 42
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or of which
any of their property is the subject.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes to our risk factors as previously disclosed in Part I,
Item IA of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
Value) of Shares |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
That May Yet Be |
|
|
Shares Repurchased |
|
Average Price Paid |
|
Announced Plans or |
|
Purchased Under the |
Period |
|
(1) |
|
Per Share |
|
Programs |
|
Plans or Programs |
January 1, 2009 to January 31, 2009 |
|
|
693 |
|
|
$ |
23.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2009 to February 28,2009 |
|
|
104 |
|
|
$ |
23.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2009 to March 31, 2009 |
|
|
187 |
|
|
$ |
17.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
984 |
|
|
$ |
21.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, 28,458 shares of restricted stock previously
awarded to certain of our associates vested. We withheld 984 shares to satisfy tax
withholding requirements for these associates. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
Page 43
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.
|
|
|
/s/ M. Terry Turner
|
|
|
M. Terry Turner |
|
April 27, 2009 |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Harold R. Carpenter
|
|
|
Harold R. Carpenter |
|
April 27, 2009 |
Chief Financial Officer |
|
Page 44