THE GORMAN-RUPP COMPANY

 

Mansfield, Ohio

 

 

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

 

The Annual Meeting of the shareholders of The Gorman-Rupp Company will be held at the Company’s Training Center, 270 West 6th Street, Mansfield, Ohio, on Thursday, April 26, 2007 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, for the purpose of considering and acting upon:

 

 

Holders of Common Shares of record at the close of business on March 14, 2007 are the only shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Meeting.

 

Please promptly execute the enclosed proxy and return it in the enclosed envelope (which requires no postage if mailed in the United States), regardless of whether you plan to attend the Meeting.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors

 

Corporate Secretary

 

March 29, 2007

 

(This page intentionally left blank)

 

 

PROXY STATEMENT

 

March 29, 2007

 

SOLICITATION AND REVOCATION OF PROXIES

 

This Proxy Statement is furnished to shareholders of The Gorman-Rupp Company in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of the Company of proxies for use at the Annual Meeting of the shareholders to be held at the Company’s Training Center, 270 West 6th Street, Mansfield, Ohio, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on Thursday, April 26, 2007. Holders of Common Shares of record at the close of business on March 14, 2007 are the only shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Meeting.

 

A shareholder, without affecting any vote previously taken, may revoke his proxy by the execution and delivery to the Company of a later proxy with respect to the same shares, or by giving notice to the Company in writing or in open meeting. The presence at the Meeting of the person appointing a proxy does not in and of itself revoke the appointment.

 

OUTSTANDING SHARES AND VOTING RIGHTS

 

As of March 14, 2007, the record date for the determination of persons entitled to vote at the Meeting, there were 13,360,004 Common Shares outstanding. Each Common Share is entitled to one vote.

 

The mailing address of the principal executive offices of the Company is 305 Bowman Street, Mansfield, Ohio 44903. This Proxy Statement and accompanying proxy are being mailed to shareholders on or about March 29, 2007.

 

If notice in writing is given by any shareholder to the President, a Vice President or the Secretary of the Company, not less than 48 hours before the time fixed for the holding of the Meeting, that such shareholder desires that the voting for the election of Directors be cumulative, and if announcement of the giving of such notice is made upon the convening of the Meeting by the Chairman or Secretary or by or on behalf of the shareholder giving such notice, each shareholder shall have the right to cumulate such voting power as he possesses at such election. Under cumulative voting, a shareholder controls voting power equal to the number of votes which he otherwise would have been entitled to cast multiplied by the number of Directors to be elected. All of such votes may be cast for a single nominee or may be distributed among any two or more nominees as he may desire. If cumulative voting is invoked, and unless contrary instructions are given by a shareholder who signs a proxy, all votes represented by such proxy will be divided evenly among the candidates nominated by the Board of Directors, except that if so voting should for any reason not be effective to elect all of the nominees named in this Proxy Statement, then such votes will be cast so as to maximize the number of the Board of Directors’ nominees elected to the Board.

 

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

(Proposal No. 1)

 

All Directors will be elected to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are elected and qualified. Proxies received are intended to be voted in favor of fixing the number of Directors at eight and for the election of the nominees named below. Each of the nominees is presently a Director of the Company. Mr. Jeffrey S. Gorman is the son of Mr. James C. Gorman, and Mr. Christopher H. Lake is the son of Dr. Peter B. Lake.

 

In the event that any of the nominees should become unavailable, which the Board of Directors does not anticipate, proxies are intended to be voted in favor of fixing the number of Directors at a lesser number or for a substitute nominee or nominees designated by the Board of Directors, in the discretion of the persons appointed as proxy holders. The proxies may be voted cumulatively for less than the entire number of nominees if any situation arises which, in the opinion of the proxy holders, makes such action necessary or desirable.

 

Based upon information received from the respective nominees as of February 1, 2007, the following information is furnished with respect to each person nominated for election as a Director.

 

 

 

 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND DIRECTORS’ COMMITTEES

 

During 2006, a total of five regularly scheduled meetings of the Board of Directors (at least one each quarter) and a total of 14 meetings of all standing Directors’ Committees were held. All Directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings held by the Board of Directors and of the total number of meetings held by the respective committees on which they served. In 2006, the “independent” Directors met once in executive session without the presence of the non-independent Directors and any members of the Company’s management.

 

The Board of Directors has four separately designated standing committees: (1) an Audit Review Committee, whose present members are Thomas E. Hoaglin (Chairman and “independent audit committee financial expert”), Peter B. Lake and W. Wayne Walston; (2) a Compensation Committee (formerly the Salary Committee), whose present members are W. Wayne Walston (Chairman), Thomas E. Hoaglin and Christopher H. Lake; (3) a Pension Committee, whose present members are Peter B. Lake (Chairman), Rick R. Taylor and John A. Walter; and (4) a Nominating Committee, whose present members are John A. Walter (Chairman), Christopher H. Lake and Rick R. Taylor. All members of each committee are independent Directors.

 

The Audit Review Committee held six meetings in 2006. Its principal functions include reviewing the arrangement and scope of the audit, considering comments made by the independent accountants with respect to internal controls and financial reporting, considering corrective action taken by management, reviewing internal accounting procedures and controls with the Company’s internal auditor and financial staff, and reviewing non-audit services provided by the independent accountants. The Committee is governed by a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors.

 

The Compensation Committee held two meetings during 2006. Its principal functions are, subject to approval by the Board of Directors, to develop compensation policies and programs for the Company’s executive officers, and to recommend the salaries and profit sharing bonuses for the executive officers. (A more comprehensive description of the Compensation Committee’s functions are set forth under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”.)

 

The Pension Committee held five meetings in 2006. Its principal functions are to monitor and assist in the investment of the assets associated with the Company’s pension plan.

 

The Nominating Committee held one meeting during 2006. Its principal functions involve the identification, evaluation and recommendation of individuals for nomination as new members of the Board of Directors. Members of the Nominating Committee are “independent” in accordance with Section 121 of the listing standards of the American Stock Exchange.

 

The Nominating Committee does not have a written charter but follows policies and procedures by which to consider recommendations from shareholders for Director nominees. (These written policies and procedures were recommended by the Committee and adopted by the Board of Directors for the

Committee in 1991.) Any shareholder wishing to propose a candidate should deliver a typewritten or legible hand-written communication to the Company’s Corporate Secretary. The submission should provide detailed business and personal biographical data about the candidate, and include a brief analysis explaining why the individual is well-qualified to become a Director nominee. All recommendations will be acknowledged by the Corporate Secretary and promptly referred to the Nominating Committee for evaluation.

 

The Nominating Committee does not believe that any particular set of skills or qualities are most appropriate for a Director candidate. All Director candidates, including any recommended by shareholders, are evaluated based upon their (i) business and financial expertise and experience; (ii) intellect to comprehend the issues confronting the Company; (iii) reputation for diligence, and limited time conflicts; and (iv) integrity, strength of character, practical wisdom and mature judgment. Any Director candidate will be subject to a background check performed by the Committee. In addition, the candidate will be personally interviewed by one or more Committee members before he or she is nominated to be a new member of the Board of Directors.

 

The Board of Directors has determined that all Non-Employee Directors (Messrs. Hoaglin, C.H. Lake, P. B. Lake, Taylor, Walston and Walter) are “independent” Directors in accordance with Section 121 of the listing standards of the American Stock Exchange. Non-Employee Directors are compensated by the Company for their services as Directors.

 

Directors who are employees of the Company (Messrs. J. C. Gorman and J. S. Gorman) do not receive any compensation for service as Directors.

 

The table below summarizes the total compensation paid for service to each of the named Non-Employee Directors of the Company for the calendar year ended December 31, 2006.

 

Director Compensation

 

 

 

 

Members of the Board of Directors are encouraged to attend the Company’s annual meetings of shareholders, time permitting. All Directors were in attendance at the annual meeting in 2006.

 

AUDIT REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT

 

The Audit Review Committee has submitted the following report to the Board of Directors:

 

(i) The Audit Review Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 with the Company’s management and the Company’s independent public accountants;

 

(ii) The Audit Review Committee has discussed with the Company’s independent public accountants the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, AU§380);

 

(iii) The Audit Review Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the Company’s independent public accountants required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees), and has discussed the issue of independence, including the provision of non-audit services to the Company, with the independent public accountants;

 

(iv) With respect to the provision of non-audit services to the Company, the Audit Review Committee has obtained a written statement from the Company’s independent public accountants that they have not rendered any non-audit services prohibited by the Securities and Exchange Commission rules relating to auditor independence, and that the delivery of any permitted non-audit services has not and will not impair their independence;

 

(v) Based upon the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Review Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission; and

 

(vi) In general, the Audit Review Committee has fulfilled its commitments in accordance with its Charter.

 

Members of the Audit Review Committee are “independent” in accordance with Section 121 of the listing standards of the American Stock Exchange. The Chairman is also an “independent audit committee financial expert” in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules.

 

Based upon a recommendation of the Audit Review Committee, the Board of Directors adopted a written Charter for the Audit Review Committee on October 23, 2003 (replacing the previous Charter adopted on June 8, 2000). The Committee reviews and reassesses the adequacy of the Charter on an annual basis. A proposal to amend the Charter was adopted by the Committee on October 27, 2005, and approved by the Board of Directors on January 26, 2006. The Charter (as amended) was set forth as an appendix to the Proxy Statement in 2006, and will again be set forth as an appendix to the Proxy Statement in 2009.

 

The foregoing report has been furnished by members of the Audit Review Committee.

 

 

SHAREHOLDINGS BY NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS*

 

 

 

 

PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS

 

The following table sets forth information pertaining to the beneficial ownership of the Company’s Common Shares as of February 1, 2007 by James C. Gorman and Jeffrey S. Gorman, and as of December 31, 2006 by each other person known to the Company to own beneficially at least five percent of the outstanding Common Shares.

 

 

 

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The rules regarding the disclosure of executive compensation were greatly altered by the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2006 for proxy statements commencing with this one. In addition to new and different tables, greater emphasis is placed on providing discussion and analysis of compensation practices. Further, the content of the Compensation Committee (formerly the Salary Committee) Report has been reduced. Accordingly, the information contained in this 2007 Proxy Statement is not directly comparable to the information included in the 2006 Proxy Statement.

 

The table below contains information pertaining to the annual compensation of the Company’s principal executive officer, its principal financial officer, and its three other most highly compensated executive officers.

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

 

 

 

 

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Overview

 

The Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors is authorized (i) to develop compensation policies and programs for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its other executive officers (collectively, the “Executives”); (ii) to review and approve, at least annually, the performance goals established by the Chief Executive Officer for the Executives; and (iii) to recommend, after considering the results of the Executives’ performance evaluations and the Company’s profitability computations, the salaries and profit sharing bonuses for the Executives.

 

Three independent Directors comprise the Committee. Their responsibilities are carried out pursuant to authority delegated by the Board of Directors and in accordance with the federal securities laws and other applicable laws and regulations. The Committee is not governed by a written charter.

 

In devising and maintaining the Company’s executive compensation program, the Committee, from time to time, reviews generally available published data relevant to the compensation of executives in competitor companies that manufacture pumps and related fluid control equipment. These reviews are not, however, subject to any formal benchmarking process. The Committee also consults with management and outside accounting and legal advisors, as appropriate, but it does not utilize the services of any compensation consultant. The Committee’s recommendations are subject to approval by the Board of Directors.

 

Philosophy and Objectives

 

Under the Committee’s supervision, the Company has formulated a compensation philosophy that assures the provision of fair, competitive and performance-based compensation to the Executives. The philosophy reflects the belief that compensation of the Executives should take note of the cost of living indicators in North Central Ohio, and should be aligned with the Company’s profitability.

 

The implementation of the Company’s philosophy seeks (i) to attract and retain a group of talented individuals with the education, experience, skill sets and professional presence deemed best suited for the Company’s executive positions; and (ii) to motivate those individuals to help the Company achieve its strategic goals and enhance profitability by offering them a chance to earn incentive compensation, in addition to their salaries, driven by the accomplishment of Company-wide and individual performance goals.

 

Elements of Compensation

 

The Company’s executive compensation program is designed to reward leadership, initiative, teamwork and top-quality performances among the Executives. The program consists of three elements: base salary; profit sharing bonus; and a component of modest miscellaneous benefits. Stock awards, option awards, and non-equity incentive plan compensation have never been a part of the Company’s executive compensation program. In addition, the Company has not entered into employment agreements with any of the Executives.

 

Although not an element of executive compensation, ownership of the Company’s Common Shares by the Executives has nevertheless long been considered a worthy goal within the Company. (The Company has paid increased dividends on its Common Shares for 34 consecutive years.) Toward that end, the Company sponsors purchase opportunities, with certain incentives, aimed at encouraging the Executives to voluntarily invest in the Common Shares.

 

Base Salary and Profit Sharing Bonus

 

Base salaries are initially premised upon the responsibilities of the given Executive and the relevant cost of living indicators. They are further adjusted based on industry surveys and related data, and performance judgments as to the past and expected future contributions of the individual. The salaries are then, however, generally set below competitive levels paid to comparable executives at other entities engaged in the same or similar businesses as the Company. As a consequence, the Company relies to a large degree on incentive compensation, in the form of a profit sharing bonus, to attract and retain the Executives, and to motivate them to perform to the full extent of their abilities.

 

In the early part of each year, the Committee reviews with the Chief Executive Officer and approves, with modifications considered appropriate, an annual base salary for each of the Executives (other than the Chief Executive Officer). The Committee independently reviews and sets the base salary for the Chief Executive Officer.

 

The profit sharing bonus for an Executive is closely tied to that individual’s annual performance evaluation, as well as to the Company’s success in achieving its targeted financial goals. This approach allows the Company to operate in a manner that encourages a long and continuing focus on building profitability and shareholder value.

 

At the beginning of each year, performance objectives for the purpose of computing annual profit sharing bonuses are established based upon the Company’s operating earnings. At the end of each year, performance against those objectives is determined by an arithmetic calculation. In determining the profit sharing bonuses for the Executives, the Committee evaluates management’s recommendations with the Chief Executive Officer based on individual performance. The Committee independently evaluates the individual performance of the Chief Executive Officer. The results of those evaluations, together with the profitability calculations, are used by the Committee to award the profit sharing bonuses to the Executives.

Other Compensation

 

The Executives receive a variety of modest miscellaneous benefits, the value of which is represented for the named executive officers under the caption “All Other Compensation” in the Summary Compensation Table. These benefits include taxable life insurance, and Company contributions to the Christmas Savings Plan, the 401(k) Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

 

Stock Ownership

 

The Company has long encouraged the Executives to voluntarily invest in the Company’s Common Shares. As a consequence, the Company makes the purchase of its Common Shares convenient (for all employees), in some cases with Company cash contributions, and in all cases without brokers’ fees or commissions, under an Employee Stock Purchase Plan, a 401(k) Plan and a Dividend Reinvestment Plan. Although these plans do not constitute elements of executive compensation, all of the current executive officers are shareholders and participate in one or more of the foregoing plans.

 

PENSION BENEFITS

 

The pension plan in which the Company’s executive officers participate is a defined benefit plan covering the executive officers and substantially all employees of the Company.

 

The plan offers participants the option to choose between monthly benefits or a single sum payment. The monthly pension benefits are equal to the product of 1.1% of final average monthly earnings (based on compensation during the final ten years of service) and the number of years of credited service. A single sum amount is equal to the present value of the final monthly pension benefit multiplied by a single premium immediate annuity rate as defined by the plan. Historically, nearly all participants in the plan elect the single sum amount at retirement. The single sum payment option is used for financial reporting purposes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, computed as the plan measurement date of October 31, 2006. Actuarial assumptions used by the Company in determining the present value of the accumulated benefit amount consists of a 5.0% interest rate, a 5.7% discount rate and a RP-2000 Mortality Table with Blue Collar Adjustment. Base compensation in excess of $220,000 is not taken into account under the plan. Vesting occurs after five years of credited service.

 

The table below summarizes the number of years of credited service and the present value of accumulated pension benefit for each of the named executive officers of the Company at December 31, 2006.

 

 

 

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

 

The Compensation Committee has submitted the following report to the Board of Directors:

 

 

 

The foregoing report has been furnished by members of the Compensation Committee.

 

 

AMENDMENT OF AMENDED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

 

(Proposal No. 2)

 

The Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders approve and adopt an amendment to the Company’s Amended Articles of Incorporation to increase, from 14,000,000 to 35,000,000, the number of Common Shares, without par value, that the Company is authorized to issue. It is important in the judgment of the Board of Directors that the Company have an adequate number of authorized Common Shares on hand to provide the Company with greater flexibility in the conduct of its business and in financing any future expansion. As of March 14, 2007, there were 13,360,004 Common Shares issued and outstanding (not including 490,347 treasury shares), leaving a balance of 149,649 Common Shares authorized and unissued. If the proposed amendment is adopted, that balance would be increased to 21,149,649 Common Shares.

 

With the approval of the Board of Directors, any of the newly authorized and unissued Common Shares would be available to be issued for such consideration as the Directors deem advisable and for any proper corporate purpose, including stock dividends, equity financings and acquisitions. While the Company currently has no immediate or specific understandings, agreements, plans or commitments concerning the issuance of any of the additional Common Shares to be authorized, the Directors believe that an increase in the number of authorized Common Shares is desirable so that Common Shares will be available for issuance from time to time for any proper corporate purpose, as the occasion may arise, without the necessity of calling special meetings of the shareholders, and the delay and expense incidental thereto. The Board of Directors does not intend to seek further shareholder approval prior to the issuance of any of the additional Common Shares to be authorized unless required by law or the rules of any stock exchange upon which the Common Shares may be listed.

 

If the proposed amendment is approved and adopted, the additional Common Shares, when properly issued, would have identical voting and other rights as the Company’s presently authorized Common Shares. The holders of the Common Shares do not and will not have preemptive rights to subscribe for any additional Common Shares which may in the future be authorized for issuance.

 

The affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the Common Shares entitled to vote at the Meeting is required for the approval and adoption of the amendment.

 

The Directors recommend a vote FOR Proposal No. 2 to amend the Company’s Amended Articles of Incorporation.

 

APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

(Proposal No. 3)

 

A proposal will be presented at the Meeting to ratify the appointment by the Audit Review Committee of the Board of Directors of Ernst & Young LLP as independent public accountants for the Company during the year ending December 31, 2007. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire, and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

 

The Company paid Ernst & Young LLP the following fees in connection with the Company’s fiscal years ending December 31, 2006 and 2005:

 

Audit Fees — $766,000 (2006); $795,000 (2005). Audit fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and the reviews of the Company’s interim financial statements included in its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, or services that are normally provided by the accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years. The fees paid in 2005 and 2006 also cover services performed in connection with the Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 attestation and other Sarbanes-Oxley requirements.

 

Audit-Related Fees — $56,500 (2006); $30,000 (2005). Audit-related fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements and are not reported under the caption “Audit Fees.” The audit-related fees were paid for the following services: benefit plan audits.

 

Tax Fees — $15,900 (2006); $48,000 (2005). Tax fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. The tax fees were paid for the following services: federal and international tax planning and advice; federal, state, local and international tax compliance; state and local tax consulting; form 5500 compliance issues; Canadian compliance issues; and other tax advice and assistance regarding statutory and regulatory matters.

 

All Other Fees — $0 (2006); $0 (2005). The “all other fees” category consists of the aggregate fees billed for products and services provided, other than the services reported in the foregoing three paragraphs.

 

Under its Charter, the Audit Review Committee is directly responsible for the oversight of the work of Ernst & Young LLP and has the sole authority to (i) appoint, retain and terminate Ernst & Young LLP, (ii) pre-approve all audit engagement fees, terms and services, and (iii) pre-approve scope and fees for any non-audit engagements with Ernst & Young LLP. The Committee exercises this authority in a manner consistent with applicable law and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the American Stock Exchange, and Ernst & Young LLP reports directly to the

Committee. In addition, the Committee has determined to delegate its authority to grant any pre-approvals to its Chairman, subject to the report of any such pre-approvals to the Committee at its next scheduled meeting. With respect to certain of the services categorized above, the following percentage of services were rendered by Ernst & Young LLP in accordance with the annual de minimus exception to the pre-approval requirement: Audit-Related Fees — 0%; Tax Fees — 0%; All Other Fees — 0%.

 

Ratification by the shareholders of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP is not required by law. However, the Board of Directors believes that shareholders should be given this opportunity to express their views on the subject. While not binding on the Audit Review Committee, the failure of the shareholders to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent public accountants would be considered by the Audit Review Committee in determining whether to continue the engagement of Ernst & Young LLP. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Review Committee may, in its discretion, select a different firm of independent public accountants for the Company at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

 

The Directors recommend a vote FOR Proposal No. 3 to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent public accountants.

 

GENERAL INFORMATION

 

The Company’s 2006 annual report to shareholders, including financial statements, is being mailed concurrently with this Proxy Statement to all shareholders of the Company.

 

The cost of soliciting proxies will be paid by the Company. In addition to the use of the mails, proxies may be solicited personally or by telephone, telecopy or other means of communication by a few officers or regular employees of the Company. No separate compensation will be paid for the solicitation of proxies, although the Company may reimburse brokers and other persons holding Common Shares in their names or in the names of nominees for their expenses in sending proxy material to the beneficial owners of such Common Shares.

 

Any proposal by a shareholder intended to be presented at the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders must be received by the Company for inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy of the Company relating to such meeting on or before November 30, 2007. If a shareholder proposal is received after February 25, 2008, it will be considered untimely and the proxy holders may use their discretionary voting authority if and when the proposal is raised at such annual meeting, without any discussion of the matter in the proxy statement. The Board of Directors’ proxy for the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders will grant discretionary voting authority to the proxy holders with respect to any such proposal received after February 25, 2008.

 

Any shareholder wishing to communicate with the Board of Directors may send a written statement or inquiry to the Company’s Corporate Secretary. All writings will be acknowledged by the Corporate Secretary and presented for consideration and response at the next scheduled Board meeting.

 

OTHER BUSINESS

 

Financial and other reports will be submitted to the Meeting, but it is not intended that any action will be taken in respect thereof. The Company did not receive notice by February 28, 2007 of, and the Board of Directors is not aware of, any matters other than those referred to in this Proxy Statement which might be brought before the Meeting for action. Therefore, if any such other matters should arise, it is intended that the persons appointed as proxy holders will vote or act thereon in accordance with their own judgment.

 

You are urged to date, sign and return your proxy promptly. For your convenience, enclosed is a self-addressed return envelope requiring no postage if mailed in the United States.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors

 

Corporate Secretary

 

March 29, 2007

The Gorman-Rupp Company
c/o National City Bank
Corporate Trust Operations
Locator 5352
P.O. Box 92301
Cleveland, OH 44101-4301

 

 

 

PLEASE MARK, DATE AND SIGN THIS PROXY CARD AND
RETURN IT IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE TO:

Corporate Election Services
PO Box 3230
Pittsburgh, PA 15230

â Please fold and detach card at perforation before mailing. â

o Please check this box if you plan to attend the Meeting.