National Fuel Gas Company 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-3880
NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
13-1086010 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
6363 Main Street |
|
|
Williamsville, New York
|
|
14221 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(716) 857-7000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller
reporting company in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). YES o NO þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date:
Common stock, $1 par value, outstanding at January 31, 2008: 83,526,251 shares.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Frequently used abbreviations, acronyms, or terms used in this report:
|
|
|
National Fuel Gas Companies |
|
|
Company
|
|
The Registrant, the Registrant and its subsidiaries or the Registrants
subsidiaries as appropriate in the context of the disclosure |
Data-Track
|
|
Data-Track Account Services, Inc. |
Distribution Corporation
|
|
National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation |
Empire
|
|
Empire State Pipeline |
ESNE
|
|
Energy Systems North East, LLC |
Highland
|
|
Highland Forest Resources, Inc. |
Horizon
|
|
Horizon Energy Development, Inc. |
Horizon LFG
|
|
Horizon LFG, Inc. |
Horizon Power
|
|
Horizon Power, Inc. |
Leidy Hub
|
|
Leidy Hub, Inc. |
Model City
|
|
Model City Energy, LLC |
National Fuel
|
|
National Fuel Gas Company |
NFR
|
|
National Fuel Resources, Inc. |
Registrant
|
|
National Fuel Gas Company |
SECI
|
|
Seneca Energy Canada Inc. |
Seneca
|
|
Seneca Resources Corporation |
Seneca Energy
|
|
Seneca Energy II, LLC |
Supply Corporation
|
|
National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation |
|
|
|
Regulatory Agencies |
|
|
FASB
|
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FERC
|
|
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
NTSB
|
|
National Transportation Safety Board |
NYDEC
|
|
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation |
NYPSC
|
|
State of New York Public Service Commission |
PaPUC
|
|
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission |
SEC
|
|
Securities and Exchange Commission |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
2007 Form 10-K
|
|
The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2007 |
ARB 51
|
|
Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements |
Bbl
|
|
Barrel (of oil) |
Bcf
|
|
Billion cubic feet (of natural gas) |
Board foot
|
|
A measure of lumber and/or timber equal to 12 inches in length by 12
inches in width by one inch in thickness. |
Btu
|
|
British thermal unit; the amount of heat needed to raise the temperature
of one pound of water one degree Fahrenheit. |
Capital expenditure
|
|
Represents additions to property, plant, and equipment, or the amount of
money a company spends to buy capital assets or upgrade its existing
capital assets. |
Cashout revenues
|
|
A cash resolution of a gas imbalance whereby a customer pays Supply
Corporation for gas the customer receives in excess of amounts
delivered into Supply Corporations system by the customers shipper. |
Degree day
|
|
A measure of the coldness of the weather experienced, based on the
extent to which the daily average temperature falls below a reference
temperature, usually 65 degrees Fahrenheit. |
Derivative
|
|
A financial instrument or other contract, the terms of which include an
underlying variable (a price, interest rate, index rate, exchange rate, or
other variable) and a notional amount (number of units, barrels, cubic
feet, etc.). The terms also permit for the instrument or contract to be
settled net and no initial net investment is required to enter into the
financial instrument or contract. Examples include futures contracts,
options, no cost collars and swaps. |
-2-
|
|
|
GLOSSARY OF TERMS (Cont.) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dth
|
|
Decatherm; one Dth of natural gas has a heating value of 1,000,000
British thermal units, approximately equal to the heating value of 1 Mcf
of natural gas. |
Exchange Act
|
|
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
Expenditures for
long-lived assets
|
|
Includes capital expenditures, stock acquisitions and/or investments in partnerships. |
FIN
|
|
FASB Interpretation Number |
FIN 48
Firm transportation
and/or storage
|
|
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
an interpretation of SFAS 109
The transportation and/or storage service that a supplier of such service
is obligated by contract to provide and for which the customer is
obligated to pay whether or not the service is utilized. |
GAAP
|
|
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America |
Goodwill
|
|
An intangible asset representing the difference between the fair value of
a company and the price at which a company is purchased. |
Hedging
|
|
A method of minimizing the impact of price, interest rate, and/or foreign
currency exchange rate changes, often times through the use of
derivative financial instruments. |
Hub
|
|
Location where pipelines intersect enabling the trading, transportation,
storage, exchange, lending and borrowing of natural gas. |
Interruptible transportation
and/or storage
|
|
The transportation and/or storage service that, in accordance with
contractual arrangements, can be interrupted by the supplier of such
service, and for which the customer does not pay unless utilized. |
LIFO
|
|
Last-in, first-out |
Mbbl
|
|
Thousand barrels (of oil) |
Mcf
|
|
Thousand cubic feet (of natural gas) |
MD&A
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations |
MDth
|
|
Thousand decatherms (of natural gas) |
MMcf
|
|
Million cubic feet (of natural gas) |
Open Season
|
|
A bidding procedure used by pipelines to allocate firm transportation or
storage capacity among prospective shippers, in which all bids
submitted during a defined (Open Season) time period are evaluated
as if they had been submitted simultaneously. |
Proved developed reserves
|
|
Reserves that can be expected to be recovered through existing wells
with existing equipment and operating methods. |
Proved undeveloped
reserves
|
|
Reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled
acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is
required to make these reserves productive. |
PRP
|
|
Potentially responsible party |
Reserves
|
|
The unproduced but recoverable oil and/or gas in place in a formation
which has been proven by production. |
Restructuring
|
|
Generally referring to partial deregulation of the utility industry by
statutory or regulatory process. Restructuring of federally regulated
natural gas pipelines resulted in the separation (or unbundling) of gas
commodity service from transportation service for wholesale and large-
volume retail markets. State restructuring programs attempt to extend
the same process to retail mass markets. |
SAR
|
|
Stock-settled stock appreciation right |
SFAS
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards |
SFAS 87
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87, Employers
Accounting for Pensions |
SFAS 88
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 88, Employers
Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit
Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits |
SFAS 106
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 106, Employers
Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions |
-3-
GLOSSARY OF TERMS (Concl.)
|
|
|
SFAS 109
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes |
SFAS 115
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities |
SFAS 123R
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment |
SFAS 132R
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 132R, Employers
Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits |
SFAS 141R
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141R, Business
Combinations |
SFAS 157
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements |
SFAS 158
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans, an amendment of SFAS 87, 88, 106, and 132R |
SFAS 159
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an
Amendment of SFAS 115 |
SFAS 160
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of
ARB 51. |
Stock acquisitions
|
|
Investments in corporations. |
Unbundled service
|
|
A service that has been separated from other services, with rates
charged that reflect only the cost of the separated service. |
WNC
|
|
Weather normalization clause; a clause in utility rates which adjusts
customer rates to allow a utility to recover its normal operating costs
calculated at normal temperatures. If temperatures during the
measured period are warmer than normal, customer rates are adjusted
upward in order to recover projected operating costs. If
temperatures during the measured period are colder than normal, customer
rates are adjusted downward so that only the projected operating costs
will be recovered. |
-4-
INDEX
|
|
The Company has nothing to report under this item. |
Reference to the Company in this report means the Registrant or the Registrant and its
subsidiaries collectively, as appropriate in the context of the disclosure. All references to a
certain year in this report are to the Companys fiscal year ended September 30 of that year,
unless otherwise noted.
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements should be read with the cautionary
statements and important factors included in this Form 10-Q at Item 2 MD&A, under the heading
Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements. Forward-looking statements are all statements other
than statements of historical fact, including, without limitation, statements regarding future
prospects, plans, performance and capital structure, anticipated capital expenditures, completion
of construction projects, projections for pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations,
impacts of the adoption of new accounting rules, and possible outcomes of litigation or regulatory
proceedings, as well as statements that are identified by the use of the words anticipates,
estimates, expects, forecasts, intends, plans, predicts, projects, believes,
seeks, will, may, and similar expressions.
-5-
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Statements of Income and Earnings
Reinvested in the Business
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Thousands of Dollars, Except Per Common Share Amounts) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenues |
|
$ |
568,268 |
|
|
$ |
490,659 |
|
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased Gas |
|
|
278,010 |
|
|
|
242,939 |
|
Operation and Maintenance |
|
|
102,455 |
|
|
|
94,704 |
|
Property, Franchise and Other Taxes |
|
|
17,672 |
|
|
|
16,952 |
|
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization |
|
|
44,121 |
|
|
|
39,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
442,258 |
|
|
|
394,002 |
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
126,010 |
|
|
|
96,657 |
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Unconsolidated Subsidiaries |
|
|
2,275 |
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
Interest Income |
|
|
3,093 |
|
|
|
1,085 |
|
Other Income |
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
Interest Expense on Long-Term Debt |
|
|
(16,289 |
) |
|
|
(16,043 |
) |
Other Interest Expense |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(1,849 |
) |
|
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes |
|
|
115,618 |
|
|
|
81,796 |
|
Income Tax Expense |
|
|
45,014 |
|
|
|
31,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations |
|
|
70,604 |
|
|
|
50,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
|
70,604 |
|
|
|
54,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS REINVESTED IN THE BUSINESS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 1 |
|
|
983,776 |
|
|
|
786,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,054,380 |
|
|
|
840,533 |
|
Share Repurchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,018 |
) |
Cumulative Effect of the Adoption of FIN 48 |
|
|
(406 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends on Common Stock
(2007 $0.31; 2006 $0.30) |
|
|
(26,023 |
) |
|
|
(24,787 |
) |
|
Balance at December 31 |
|
$ |
1,027,951 |
|
|
$ |
781,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Common Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations |
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
Income from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations |
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
Income from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used in Basic Calculation |
|
|
83,611,177 |
|
|
|
82,679,343 |
|
|
Used in Diluted Calculation |
|
|
85,819,534 |
|
|
|
84,730,910 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-6-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
(Thousands of Dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
$ |
4,525,608 |
|
|
$ |
4,461,586 |
|
Less Accumulated Depreciation, Depletion
and Amortization |
|
|
1,616,488 |
|
|
|
1,583,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,909,120 |
|
|
|
2,878,405 |
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Temporary Cash Investments |
|
|
189,767 |
|
|
|
124,806 |
|
Cash Held in Escrow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,964 |
|
Hedging Collateral Deposits |
|
|
1,996 |
|
|
|
4,066 |
|
Receivables Net of Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts of
$34,106 and $28,654, Respectively |
|
|
242,440 |
|
|
|
172,380 |
|
Unbilled Utility Revenue |
|
|
78,480 |
|
|
|
20,682 |
|
Gas Stored Underground |
|
|
60,481 |
|
|
|
66,195 |
|
Materials and Supplies at average cost |
|
|
41,569 |
|
|
|
35,669 |
|
Unrecovered Purchased Gas Costs |
|
|
12,186 |
|
|
|
14,769 |
|
Other Current Assets |
|
|
32,453 |
|
|
|
45,057 |
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
17,468 |
|
|
|
8,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
676,840 |
|
|
|
554,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoverable Future Taxes |
|
|
83,787 |
|
|
|
83,954 |
|
Unamortized Debt Expense |
|
|
11,586 |
|
|
|
12,070 |
|
Other Regulatory Assets |
|
|
131,154 |
|
|
|
137,577 |
|
Deferred Charges |
|
|
5,582 |
|
|
|
5,545 |
|
Other Investments |
|
|
85,325 |
|
|
|
85,902 |
|
Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries |
|
|
17,825 |
|
|
|
18,256 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
5,476 |
|
|
|
5,476 |
|
Intangible Assets |
|
|
28,170 |
|
|
|
28,836 |
|
Prepaid Pension and Post-Retirement Benefit Costs |
|
|
63,188 |
|
|
|
61,006 |
|
Fair Value of Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
|
6,026 |
|
|
|
9,188 |
|
Other |
|
|
7,344 |
|
|
|
8,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
445,463 |
|
|
|
455,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
4,031,423 |
|
|
$ |
3,888,412 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-7-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(Thousands of Dollars) |
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $1 Par Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized - 200,000,000 Shares;
Issued And Outstanding 83,946,575 Shares
And 83,461,308 Shares, Respectively |
|
$ |
83,947 |
|
|
$ |
83,461 |
|
Paid in Capital |
|
|
595,375 |
|
|
|
569,085 |
|
Earnings Reinvested in the Business |
|
|
1,027,951 |
|
|
|
983,776 |
|
|
Total Common Shareholder Equity Before
Items of Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
|
1,707,273 |
|
|
|
1,636,322 |
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
|
(16,286 |
) |
|
|
(6,203 |
) |
|
Total Comprehensive Shareholders Equity |
|
|
1,690,987 |
|
|
|
1,630,119 |
|
Long-Term Debt, Net of Current Portion |
|
|
799,000 |
|
|
|
799,000 |
|
|
Total Capitalization |
|
|
2,489,987 |
|
|
|
2,429,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and Accrued Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes Payable to Banks and Commercial Paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,024 |
|
Accounts Payable |
|
|
152,155 |
|
|
|
109,757 |
|
Amounts Payable to Customers |
|
|
9,181 |
|
|
|
10,409 |
|
Dividends Payable |
|
|
26,023 |
|
|
|
25,873 |
|
Interest Payable on Long-Term Debt |
|
|
13,541 |
|
|
|
18,158 |
|
Customer Advances |
|
|
23,498 |
|
|
|
22,863 |
|
Other Accruals and Current Liabilities |
|
|
50,207 |
|
|
|
36,062 |
|
Fair Value of Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
|
29,089 |
|
|
|
16,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
503,694 |
|
|
|
439,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Credits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
581,692 |
|
|
|
575,356 |
|
Taxes Refundable to Customers |
|
|
14,031 |
|
|
|
14,026 |
|
Unamortized Investment Tax Credit |
|
|
5,217 |
|
|
|
5,392 |
|
Cost of Removal Regulatory Liability |
|
|
98,613 |
|
|
|
91,226 |
|
Other Regulatory Liabilities |
|
|
78,374 |
|
|
|
76,659 |
|
Post-Retirement Liabilities |
|
|
66,706 |
|
|
|
70,555 |
|
Asset Retirement Obligations |
|
|
77,253 |
|
|
|
75,939 |
|
Other Deferred Credits |
|
|
115,856 |
|
|
|
110,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,037,742 |
|
|
|
1,019,947 |
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capitalization and Liabilities |
|
$ |
4,031,423 |
|
|
$ |
3,888,412 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-8-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
(Thousands of Dollars) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
70,604 |
|
|
$ |
54,520 |
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash
Provided by Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization |
|
|
44,121 |
|
|
|
42,825 |
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
5,296 |
|
|
|
11,198 |
|
Income from Unconsolidated Subsidiaries, Net of
Cash Distributions |
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Excess Tax Benefits Associated with Stock-Based
Compensation Awards |
|
|
(16,275 |
) |
|
|
(13,717 |
) |
Other |
|
|
4,916 |
|
|
|
5,728 |
|
Change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging Collateral Deposits |
|
|
2,070 |
|
|
|
9,916 |
|
Receivables and Unbilled Utility Revenue |
|
|
(127,894 |
) |
|
|
(91,875 |
) |
Gas Stored Underground and Materials and Supplies |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
5,324 |
|
Unrecovered Purchased Gas Costs |
|
|
2,583 |
|
|
|
(11,021 |
) |
Prepayments and Other Current Assets |
|
|
10,422 |
|
|
|
20,398 |
|
Accounts Payable |
|
|
42,398 |
|
|
|
11,736 |
|
Amounts Payable to Customers |
|
|
(1,228 |
) |
|
|
3,166 |
|
Customer Advances |
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
Other Accruals and Current Liabilities |
|
|
25,400 |
|
|
|
(756 |
) |
Other Assets |
|
|
10,163 |
|
|
|
1,883 |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
1,889 |
|
|
|
(6,810 |
) |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
75,345 |
|
|
|
43,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures |
|
|
(69,744 |
) |
|
|
(65,302 |
) |
Investment in Partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,650 |
) |
Cash Held in Escrow |
|
|
58,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds from Sale of Oil and Gas Producing Properties |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
2,141 |
|
Other |
|
|
(761 |
) |
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
|
|
(10,608 |
) |
|
|
(65,127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Notes Payable to Banks and Commercial Paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,600 |
|
Excess Tax Benefits Associated with Stock-Based
Compensation Awards |
|
|
16,275 |
|
|
|
13,717 |
|
Shares Repurchased under Repurchase Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,921 |
) |
Reduction of Long-Term Debt |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(23,005 |
) |
Dividends Paid on Common Stock |
|
|
(25,873 |
) |
|
|
(25,026 |
) |
Net Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock |
|
|
9,846 |
|
|
|
6,743 |
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities |
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rates on Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,025 |
) |
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Temporary Cash
Investments |
|
|
64,961 |
|
|
|
(22,013 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Temporary Cash Investments at October 1 |
|
|
124,806 |
|
|
|
69,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Temporary Cash Investments at December 31 |
|
$ |
189,767 |
|
|
$ |
47,598 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-9-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
(Thousands of Dollars) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
70,604 |
|
|
$ |
54,520 |
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(4,868 |
) |
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Securities Available for Sale
Arising During the Period |
|
|
(1,201 |
) |
|
|
790 |
|
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Financial Instruments
Arising During the Period |
|
|
(20,859 |
) |
|
|
9,501 |
|
Reclassification Adjustment for Realized Losses on
Derivative Financial Instruments in Net Income |
|
|
5,421 |
|
|
|
3,177 |
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax |
|
|
(16,657 |
) |
|
|
8,600 |
|
|
Income Tax
Expense (Benefit) Related to Unrealized Gain (Loss)
on Securities Available for Sale Arising During the Period |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
275 |
|
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) Related to Unrealized Gain (Loss) on
Derivative Financial Instruments Arising During the Period |
|
|
(8,648 |
) |
|
|
3,730 |
|
Reclassification Adjustment for Income Tax Benefit on
Realized Losses from Derivative Financial Instruments
In Net Income |
|
|
2,133 |
|
|
|
2,020 |
|
|
Income Taxes Net |
|
|
(6,574 |
) |
|
|
6,025 |
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
(10,083 |
) |
|
|
2,575 |
|
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
$ |
60,521 |
|
|
$ |
57,095 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-10-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation. The Company consolidates its majority owned entities. The equity
method is used to account for minority owned entities. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions are eliminated.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassification. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with current year
presentation.
Earnings for Interim Periods. The Company, in its opinion, has included all adjustments that are
necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations for the reported periods. The
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, included herein, should be read in conjunction
with the financial statements and notes for the years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 that
are included in the Companys 2007 Form 10-K. The consolidated financial statements for the year
ended September 30, 2008 will be audited by the Companys independent registered public accounting
firm after the end of the fiscal year.
The earnings for the three months ended December 31, 2007 should not be taken as a prediction
of earnings for the entire fiscal year ending September 30, 2008. Most of the business of the
Utility and Energy Marketing segments is seasonal in nature and is influenced by weather
conditions. Due to the seasonal nature of the heating business in the Utility and Energy Marketing
segments, earnings during the winter months normally represent a substantial part of the earnings
that those segments are expected to achieve for the entire fiscal year.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. For purposes of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows,
the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of generally
three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Hedging Collateral Deposits. Cash held in margin accounts serve as collateral for open positions
on exchange-traded futures contracts, exchange-traded options and over-the-counter swaps and
collars.
Cash Held in Escrow. On August 31, 2007, the Company received approximately $232.1 million of
proceeds from the sale of SECI, of which $58.0 million was placed in escrow pending receipt of a
tax clearance certificate from the Canadian government. The escrow account is a Canadian dollar
denominated account. On a U.S. dollar basis, the value of this account was $62.0 million at
September 30, 2007. In December 2007, the Canadian government issued the tax clearance
certificate, thereby releasing the proceeds from restriction as of December 31, 2007. To hedge
against foreign currency exchange risk related to the cash being held in escrow, the Company holds
a forward contract to sell Canadian dollars. For presentation purposes on the Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows, for the three months ended December 31, 2007, the Cash Held in Escrow line
item within Investing Activities reflects the net proceeds to the Company after adjusting for the
impact of the foreign currency hedge.
-11-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
Gas Stored Underground Current. In the Utility segment, gas stored underground current is
carried at lower of cost or market, on a LIFO method. Gas stored underground current normally
declines during the first and second quarters of the year and is replenished during the third and
fourth quarters. In the Utility segment, the current cost of replacing gas withdrawn from storage
is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income and a reserve for gas replacement is recorded
in the Consolidated Balance Sheets under the caption Other Accruals and Current Liabilities.
Such reserve, which amounted to $13.8 million at December 31, 2007, is reduced to zero by September
30 of each year as the inventory is replenished.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). The components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss), net of related tax effect, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007 |
|
|
At September 30, 2007 |
|
|
Funded Position of the Pension and
Other Post-Retirement Benefit Plans
Adjustment |
|
$ |
(12,482 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,482 |
) |
Cumulative Foreign Currency
Translation Adjustment |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
Net Unrealized Loss on Derivative
Financial Instruments |
|
|
(12,809 |
) |
|
|
(3,886 |
) |
Net Unrealized Gain on Securities
Available for Sale |
|
|
9,106 |
|
|
|
10,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Loss |
|
$ |
(16,286 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,203 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Common Share. Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing income
available for common stock by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted earnings per common share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if
securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.
For purposes of determining diluted earnings per common share, the only potentially dilutive
securities the Company has outstanding are stock options and stock-settled SARs. The diluted
weighted average shares outstanding shown on the Consolidated Statement of Income reflects the
potential dilution as a result of these stock options and stock-settled SARs as determined using
the Treasury Stock Method. Stock options and stock-settled SARs that are antidilutive are excluded
from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share. For the quarter ended December 31,
2007, there were no stock options or stock-settled SARs excluded as being antidilutive. For the
quarter ended December 31, 2006, there were 122,253 stock options excluded as being antidilutive.
There were no stock-settled SARs excluded as being antidilutive for the quarter ended December 31,
2006.
Share Repurchases. The Company considers all shares repurchased as cancelled shares restored to
the status of authorized but unissued shares, in accordance with New Jersey law. The repurchases
are accounted for on the date the share repurchase is settled as an adjustment to common stock (at
par value) with the excess repurchase price allocated between paid in capital and retained
earnings. Refer to Note 3 Capitalization for further discussion of the share repurchase
program.
Stock-Based Compensation. The Company granted 25,000 restricted share awards (non-vested stock as
defined in SFAS 123R) during the quarter ended December 31, 2007. The weighted average fair value
of such restricted shares was $48.41 per share. There were no stock options or stock-settled SARs
granted during the quarter ended December 31, 2007.
-12-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
New Accounting Pronouncements. On October 1, 2007, the Company adopted FIN 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a
minimum probability threshold that a tax position must meet before a financial statement benefit is
recognized. The minimum threshold is defined in FIN 48 as a tax position that is more likely than
not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of
any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. If a
tax benefit meets this threshold, it is measured and recognized based on an analysis of the
cumulative probability of the tax benefit being ultimately sustained. The adoption of FIN 48 did
not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements. For further
discussion of the impact of adopting FIN 48, refer to Note 2 Income Taxes.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 provides
guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The pronouncement serves to
clarify the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information
used to measure fair value, and the effect that fair-value measurements have on earnings. SFAS 157
is to be applied whenever another standard requires or allows assets or liabilities to be measured
at fair value. The pronouncement is
effective for financial assets and financial liabilities that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis as of the Companys first quarter of fiscal 2009. The pronouncement is effective for nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis, as of the
Companys first quarter of fiscal 2010. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS 157 will have on its
consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB also issued SFAS 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (an amendment of SFAS 87, SFAS 88, SFAS 106, and SFAS
132R). SFAS 158 requires that companies recognize a net liability or asset to report the
underfunded or overfunded status of their defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit
plans on their balance sheets, as well as recognize changes in the funded status of a defined
benefit post-retirement plan in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income.
The pronouncement also specifies that a plans assets and obligations that determine its funded
status be measured as of the end of the Companys fiscal year, with limited exceptions. In
accordance with SFAS 158, the Company has recognized the funded status of its benefit plans and
implemented the disclosure requirements of SFAS 158 at September 30, 2007. The requirement to
measure the plan assets and benefit obligations as of the Companys fiscal year-end date will be
adopted by the Company by the end of fiscal 2009. Currently, the Company measures its plan assets
and benefit obligations using a June 30th measurement date.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of SFAS 115. SFAS 159 permits entities to choose
to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not otherwise
required to be measured at fair value under GAAP. A company that elects the fair value option for
an eligible item will be required to recognize in current earnings any changes in that items fair
value in reporting periods subsequent to the date of adoption. SFAS 159 is effective as of the
Companys first quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any,
that the adoption of SFAS 159 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R, Business Combinations. SFAS 141R will
significantly change the accounting for business combinations in a number of areas including the
treatment of contingent consideration, contingencies, acquisition costs, in process research and
development and restructuring costs. In addition, under SFAS 141R, changes in deferred tax asset
valuation allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties in a business combination after the
measurement period will impact income tax expense. SFAS 141R is effective as of the Companys
first quarter of fiscal 2010.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB 51. SFAS 160 will change the accounting and reporting for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests (NCI) and
classified as a component of equity. This new consolidation method will significantly change the
accounting for transactions with minority interest holders. SFAS 160 is effective as of the
Companys first quarter of fiscal 2010. The Company currently does not have any NCI.
-13-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
Note 2 Income Taxes
The components of federal, state and foreign income taxes included in the Consolidated
Statement of Income are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Current Income Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
34,259 |
|
|
$ |
16,653 |
|
State |
|
|
5,459 |
|
|
|
5,036 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
8,210 |
|
State |
|
|
5,376 |
|
|
|
1,209 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,014 |
|
|
|
32,887 |
|
Deferred Investment Tax Credit |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Income Taxes |
|
$ |
44,840 |
|
|
$ |
32,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presented as Follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income |
|
$ |
(174 |
) |
|
$ |
(174 |
) |
Income Tax Expense Continuing
Operations |
|
|
45,014 |
|
|
|
31,108 |
|
Income from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Income Taxes |
|
$ |
44,840 |
|
|
$ |
32,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The U.S. and foreign components of income before income taxes are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
$ |
115,389 |
|
|
$ |
81,575 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
5,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
115,444 |
|
|
$ |
87,233 |
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes as reported differ from the amounts that were computed by applying the
federal income tax rate to income before income taxes. The following is a reconciliation of this
difference (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense, Computed at
Statutory Rate of 35% |
|
$ |
40,405 |
|
|
$ |
30,532 |
|
Increase (Reduction) in Taxes Resulting From: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State Income Taxes |
|
|
7,043 |
|
|
|
4,059 |
|
Miscellaneous |
|
|
(2,608 |
) |
|
|
(1,878 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total Income Taxes |
|
$ |
44,840 |
|
|
$ |
32,713 |
|
|
|
|
-14-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
Significant components of the Companys deferred tax liabilities and assets were as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007 |
|
At September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
$ |
626,814 |
|
|
$ |
612,648 |
|
Other |
|
|
49,684 |
|
|
|
61,616 |
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities |
|
|
676,498 |
|
|
|
674,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(112,274 |
) |
|
|
(107,458 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Assets |
|
|
(112,274 |
) |
|
|
(107,458 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Net Deferred Income Taxes |
|
$ |
564,224 |
|
|
$ |
566,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presented as Follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Deferred Tax Asset Current |
|
$ |
(17,468 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,550 |
) |
Net Deferred Tax Liability Non-Current |
|
|
581,692 |
|
|
|
575,356 |
|
|
|
|
Total Net Deferred Income Taxes |
|
$ |
564,224 |
|
|
$ |
566,806 |
|
|
|
|
Regulatory liabilities representing the reduction of previously recorded deferred income taxes
with rate-regulated activities that are expected to be refundable to customers amounted to $14.0
million at both December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007. Also, regulatory assets representing
future amounts collectible from customers, corresponding to additional deferred income taxes not
previously recorded because of prior ratemaking practices, amounted to $83.8 million and $84.0
million at December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007, respectively.
As indicated under New Accounting Pronouncements in Note 1 Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies, the Company adopted FIN 48 on October 1, 2007. As of the date of adoption, a
cumulative effect adjustment was recorded that resulted in a decrease to retained earnings of $0.4
million. Upon adoption, the unrecognized tax benefits were $1.7 million, all of which would impact
the effective tax rate (net of federal benefit) if recognized. There was no change in the balance
of unrecognized tax benefits during the quarter ended December 31, 2007 and the Company does not
expect a material change within the next twelve months.
Consistent with existing policies, the Company recognizes estimated interest payable relating
to income taxes in Other Interest Expense and estimated penalties relating to income taxes in Other
Income. As of October 1, 2007, the Company has accrued interest of $0.5 million and has not
accrued any penalties.
The Company files U.S. federal and various state income tax returns. The Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) is currently conducting an examination of the Company for fiscal 2007 in accordance
with the Compliance Assurance Process (CAP). The CAP audit employs a real time review of the
Companys books and tax records by the IRS that is intended to permit issue resolution prior to the
filing of the tax return. While the federal statute of limitations remains open for fiscal 2004
and later years, IRS examinations for years prior to fiscal 2007 have been completed and the
Company believes such years are effectively settled.
For the major states in which the various subsidiary companies operate, the earliest tax year
open for examination is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
Fiscal 2002 |
Pennsylvania |
|
Fiscal 2003 |
California |
|
Fiscal 2003 |
Texas |
|
Fiscal 2003 |
-15-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
Note 3 Capitalization
Common Stock. During the three months ended December 31, 2007, the Company issued 496,714 original
issue shares of common stock as a result of stock option exercises and 25,000 original issue shares
for restricted stock awards (non-vested stock as defined in SFAS 123R). The Company also issued
2,400 original issue shares of common stock to the non-employee directors of the Company as partial
consideration for the directors services during the three months ended December 31, 2007. Holders
of stock options or restricted stock will often tender shares of common stock to the Company for
payment of option exercise prices and/or applicable withholding taxes. During the three months
ended December 31, 2007, 38,847 shares of common stock were tendered to the Company for such
purposes. The Company considers all shares tendered as cancelled shares restored to the status of
authorized but unissued shares, in accordance with New Jersey law.
On December 8, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the Company to implement a
share repurchase program, whereby the Company may repurchase outstanding shares of common stock, up
to an aggregate amount of 8 million shares in the open market or through privately negotiated
transactions. During the quarter ended December 31, 2007, the Company did not repurchase any
shares under this program. Since the share repurchase program was implemented, the Company has
repurchased 3,834,878 shares for $133.2 million.
Note 4 Commitments and Contingencies
Environmental Matters. The Company is subject to various federal, state and local laws and
regulations relating to the protection of the environment. The Company has established procedures
for the ongoing evaluation of its operations to identify potential environmental exposures and to
comply with regulatory policies and procedures. It is the Companys policy to accrue estimated
environmental clean-up costs (investigation and remediation) when such amounts can reasonably be
estimated and it is probable that the Company will be required to incur such costs.
As disclosed in Note H of the Companys 2007 Form 10-K, the Company received, in 1998 and
again in October 1999, notice that the NYDEC believes the Company is responsible for contamination
discovered at a former manufactured gas plant site located in New York for which the Company had
not been named as a PRP. In February 2007, the NYDEC identified the Company as a PRP for the site
and issued a proposed remedial action plan. The NYDEC estimated clean-up costs under its proposed
remedy to be $8.9 million if implemented. Although the Company commented to the NYDEC that the
proposed remedial action plan contained a number of material errors, omissions and procedural
defects, the NYDEC, in a March 2007 Record of Decision, selected the remedy it had previously
proposed. In July 2007, the Company appealed the NYDECs Record of Decision to the New York State
Supreme Court, Albany County. The Court dismissed the appeal in January 2008. The Company is
reviewing its options in this matter and believes that a negotiated resolution with the NYDEC
regarding the site remains possible.
At December 31, 2007, the Company has estimated its remaining clean-up costs related to former
manufactured gas plant sites and third party waste disposal sites (including the former
manufactured gas plant site discussed above) will be in the range of $12.1 million to $15.8
million. The minimum estimated liability of $12.1 million has been recorded on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet at December 31, 2007. The Company expects to recover its environmental clean-up
costs from a combination of rate recovery and insurance proceeds.
The Company is currently not aware of any material additional exposure to environmental
liabilities. However, changes in environmental regulations or other factors could adversely impact
the Company.
Other. The Company is involved in other litigation and regulatory matters arising in the normal
course of business. These other matters may include, for example, negligence claims and tax,
regulatory or other governmental audits, inspections, investigations and other proceedings. These matters may
involve state and federal taxes, safety, compliance with regulations, rate base, cost of
service and purchased
-16-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
gas cost issues, among other things. While these normal-course matters could have a material
effect on earnings and cash flows in the quarterly and annual period in which they are resolved,
they are not expected to change materially the Companys present liquidity position, nor to have a
material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company.
Note 5 Discontinued Operations
On August 31, 2007, the Company, in its Exploration and Production segment, completed the sale
of SECI, Senecas wholly owned subsidiary that operated in Canada. The Company received
approximately $232.1 million of proceeds from the sale, of which $58.0 million was placed in escrow
pending receipt of a tax clearance certificate from the Canadian government. In December 2007, the
Canadian government issued the tax clearance certificate, thereby releasing the proceeds from
restriction as of December 31, 2007. The sale resulted in the recognition of a gain of
approximately $120.3 million, net of tax, during the fourth quarter of 2007. SECI is engaged in the
exploration for, and the development and purchase of, natural gas and oil reserves in the provinces
of Alberta, Saskatchewan and British Columbia in Canada. The decision to sell was based on lower
than expected returns from the Canadian oil and gas properties combined with difficulty in finding
significant new reserves. Seneca will continue its exploration and development activities in the
Gulf of Mexico, in California and in Appalachia. As a result of the decision to sell SECI, the
Company began presenting all SECI operations as discontinued operations during the fourth quarter
of 2007.
The following is selected financial information of the discontinued operations for SECI:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
$ |
13,581 |
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
8,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
5,333 |
|
Interest Income |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income before Income Taxes |
|
|
5,611 |
|
Income Tax Expense |
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Discontinued Operations |
|
$ |
3,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6 Business Segment Information
The Company has five reportable segments: Utility, Pipeline and Storage, Exploration and
Production, Energy Marketing, and Timber. The division of the Companys operations into the
reportable segments is based upon a combination of factors including differences in products and
services, regulatory environment and geographic factors.
The data presented in the tables below reflect the reportable segments and reconciliations to
consolidated amounts. As stated in the 2007 Form 10-K, the Company evaluates segment performance
based on income before discontinued operations, extraordinary items and cumulative effects of
changes in accounting (when applicable). When these items are not applicable, the Company
evaluates performance based on net income. There have been no changes in the basis of segmentation
nor in the basis of measuring segment profit or loss from those used in the Companys 2007 Form
10-K. There have been no material changes in the amount of assets for any operating segment from
the amounts disclosed in the 2007 Form 10-K.
-17-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
Quarter Ended December 31, 2007 (Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline |
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
and |
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
|
Total |
|
|
Utility |
|
Storage |
|
Production |
|
Marketing |
|
Timber |
|
Segments |
|
All Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from
External Customers |
|
$ |
327,125 |
|
|
$ |
31,884 |
|
|
$ |
107,955 |
|
|
$ |
86,719 |
|
|
$ |
12,900 |
|
|
$ |
566,583 |
|
|
$ |
1,550 |
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
568,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment Revenues |
|
$ |
4,299 |
|
|
$ |
20,347 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,646 |
|
|
$ |
2,714 |
|
|
$ |
(27,360 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
20,217 |
|
|
$ |
12,778 |
|
|
$ |
34,022 |
|
|
$ |
954 |
|
|
$ |
397 |
|
|
$ |
68,368 |
|
|
$ |
2,339 |
|
|
$ |
(103 |
) |
|
$ |
70,604 |
|
Quarter Ended December 31, 2006 (Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline |
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
and |
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
|
Total |
|
|
Utility |
|
Storage |
|
Production |
|
Marketing |
|
Timber |
|
Segments |
|
All Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from
External Customers |
|
$ |
288,782 |
|
|
$ |
29,809 |
|
|
$ |
75,128 |
|
|
$ |
83,318 |
|
|
$ |
11,763 |
|
|
$ |
488,800 |
|
|
$ |
1,676 |
|
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
490,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment Revenues |
|
$ |
4,029 |
|
|
$ |
20,368 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,397 |
|
|
$ |
2,198 |
|
|
$ |
(26,595 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from
Continuing
Operations |
|
$ |
17,174 |
|
|
$ |
13,688 |
|
|
$ |
16,891 |
|
|
$ |
492 |
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
48,462 |
|
|
$ |
985 |
|
|
$ |
1,241 |
|
|
$ |
50,688 |
|
Note 7 Intangible Assets
The components of the Companys intangible assets were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, |
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Transportation Contracts |
|
$ |
8,580 |
|
|
$ |
(5,256 |
) |
|
$ |
3,324 |
|
|
$ |
3,591 |
|
Long-Term Gas Purchase Contracts |
|
|
31,864 |
|
|
|
(7,018 |
) |
|
|
24,846 |
|
|
|
25,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40,444 |
|
|
$ |
(12,274 |
) |
|
$ |
28,170 |
|
|
$ |
28,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Amortization Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-18-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
The gross carrying amount of intangible assets subject to amortization at December 31, 2007
remained unchanged from September 30, 2007. The only activity with regard to intangible assets
subject to amortization was amortization expense as shown in the table above. Amortization expense
for the transportation contracts is estimated to be $0.8 million for the remainder of 2008 and $0.5
million for 2009. Amortization expense for transportation contracts is estimated to be $0.4
million for 2010, 2011 and 2012. Amortization expense for the long-term gas purchase contracts is
estimated to be $1.2 million for the remainder of 2008 and $1.6 million annually for 2009, 2010,
2011 and 2012.
Note 8 Retirement Plan and Other Post-Retirement Benefits
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost (in thousands):
Three months ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plan |
|
Other Post-Retirement Benefits |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service Cost |
|
$ |
3,150 |
|
|
$ |
3,225 |
|
|
$ |
1,276 |
|
|
$ |
1,403 |
|
Interest Cost |
|
|
11,237 |
|
|
|
11,088 |
|
|
|
6,771 |
|
|
|
6,800 |
|
Expected Return on Plan Assets |
|
|
(13,750 |
) |
|
|
(12,809 |
) |
|
|
(8,429 |
) |
|
|
(6,740 |
) |
Amortization of Prior Service Cost |
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Amortization of Transition Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,782 |
|
|
|
1,782 |
|
Amortization of Losses |
|
|
2,766 |
|
|
|
3,382 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
2,053 |
|
Net Amortization and Deferral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Regulatory Purposes (Including
Volumetric Adjustments) (1) |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
7,212 |
|
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Periodic Benefit Cost |
|
$ |
4,705 |
|
|
$ |
5,261 |
|
|
$ |
9,345 |
|
|
$ |
7,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Companys policy is to record retirement plan and other post-retirement benefit
costs in the Utility segment on a volumetric basis to reflect the fact that the Utility segment
experiences higher throughput of natural gas in the winter months and lower throughput of natural
gas in the summer months. |
Employer Contributions. During the three months ended December 31, 2007, the Company contributed
$2.5 million to its retirement plan and $9.5 million to its other post-retirement benefit plan. In
the remainder of 2008, the Company expects to contribute in the range of $12.0 million to $17.0
million to its retirement plan and to contribute in the range of $15.0 million to $25.0 million to
its other post-retirement benefit plan.
-19-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
OVERVIEW
The Company is a diversified energy company consisting of five reportable business segments.
For the quarter ended December 31, 2007 compared to the quarter ended December 31, 2006, the
Company has experienced an overall increase in earnings of $16.1 million primarily due to higher
earnings in the Exploration and Production segment. Earnings were also higher in the Utility,
Energy Marketing, and Timber segments, as well as the All Other category. Lower earnings in the
Pipeline and Storage segment and the Corporate category slightly offset these increases. The
Companys earnings are discussed further in the Results of Operations section that follows.
From a capital resources and liquidity perspective, the Company spent $69.7 million on capital
expenditures during the quarter ended December 31, 2007, with approximately 44% being spent in the
Exploration and Production segment, 36% in the Pipeline and Storage segment and 18% in the Utility
segment. In the Pipeline and Storage segment, the majority of the expenditures were for
construction of 18 miles of the Empire Connector project. The Company expects to complete the
project by November 1, 2008. This project and other capital expenditures are discussed further in
the Capital Resources and Liquidity section that follows.
On January 29, 2007, the Company commenced a rate case in the New York jurisdiction of the
Utility segment by filing proposed tariff amendments and supporting testimony requesting approval
to increase its annual revenues by $52.0 million annually. The Company explained in the filing that
its request for rate relief is necessitated by decreased revenues resulting from customer
conservation efforts and increased customer uncollectibles, among other things. The rate filing
also included a proposal for an aggressive efficiency and conservation initiative with a revenue
decoupling mechanism designed to render the Company indifferent to throughput reductions resulting
from conservation. In September 2007, the NYPSC issued an order approving the Companys
conservation program, and the administrative law judge assigned to the proceeding issued a
recommended decision. In December 2007, the NYPSC issued an Order that provides for an annual rate
increase, effective December 28, 2007, of $1.8 million as well as a monthly bill surcharge that
would collect up to $10.8 million to recover expenses arising from the conservation program. The
Order also approved the Companys proposed revenue decoupling mechanism. This matter is discussed
more fully in the Rate and Regulatory Matters section that follows.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
For a complete discussion of critical accounting estimates, refer to Critical Accounting
Estimates in Item 7 of the Companys 2007 Form 10-K. There have been no subsequent changes to
that disclosure.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Earnings
The Companys earnings were $70.6 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 compared to
earnings of $54.5 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2006. As previously discussed, the
Company has presented its Canadian operations in the Exploration and Production segment (in
conjunction with the sale of SECI) as discontinued operations. The Companys earnings from
continuing operations were $70.6 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 compared to
earnings from continuing operations of $50.7 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2006. The
increase in earnings from continuing operations of $19.9 million is the result of higher earnings
in the Exploration and Production, Utility, Energy Marketing, and Timber segments, and the All
Other category, slightly offset by lower earnings in the Pipeline and Storage segment and the
Corporate category. Additional discussion of earnings in each of the business segments can be
found in the business segment information that follows. Note that all amounts used in the earnings discussions are after-tax amounts, unless
otherwise noted.
-20-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Earnings (Loss) by Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
Three Months Ended December 31 (Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Utility |
|
$ |
20,217 |
|
|
$ |
17,174 |
|
|
$ |
3,043 |
|
Pipeline and Storage |
|
|
12,778 |
|
|
|
13,688 |
|
|
|
(910 |
) |
Exploration and Production |
|
|
34,022 |
|
|
|
16,891 |
|
|
|
17,131 |
|
Energy Marketing |
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
Timber |
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
Total Reportable Segments |
|
|
68,368 |
|
|
|
48,462 |
|
|
|
19,906 |
|
All Other |
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
1,354 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
(1,344 |
) |
|
Total Earnings from Continuing Operations |
|
|
70,604 |
|
|
|
50,688 |
|
|
|
19,916 |
|
|
Earnings from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,832 |
|
|
|
(3,832 |
) |
|
Total Consolidated |
|
$ |
70,604 |
|
|
$ |
54,520 |
|
|
$ |
16,084 |
|
|
Utility
Utility Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
Three Months Ended December 31 (Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Retail Sales Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
$ |
246,797 |
|
|
$ |
225,432 |
|
|
$ |
21,365 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
38,033 |
|
|
|
35,635 |
|
|
|
2,398 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
1,651 |
|
|
|
1,901 |
|
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
286,481 |
|
|
|
262,968 |
|
|
|
23,513 |
|
|
Transportation |
|
|
33,424 |
|
|
|
26,876 |
|
|
|
6,548 |
|
Off-System Sales |
|
|
8,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,213 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,306 |
|
|
|
2,967 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
331,424 |
|
|
$ |
292,811 |
|
|
$ |
38,613 |
|
|
Utility Throughput
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
Three Months Ended December 31 (MMcf) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Retail Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
17,127 |
|
|
|
16,678 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
2,877 |
|
|
|
2,868 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
|
|
20,127 |
|
|
|
19,738 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
Transportation |
|
|
17,827 |
|
|
|
15,853 |
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
Off-System Sales |
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
38,985 |
|
|
|
35,591 |
|
|
|
3,394 |
|
|
Degree Days
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colder (Warmer) Than |
December 31 |
|
Normal |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Normal |
|
Prior Year |
|
Buffalo |
|
|
2,260 |
|
|
|
2,094 |
|
|
|
1,947 |
|
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
7.6 |
|
Erie |
|
|
2,081 |
|
|
|
1,871 |
|
|
|
1,878 |
|
|
|
(10.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
2007 Compared with 2006
Operating revenues for the Utility segment increased $38.6 million for the quarter ended
December 31, 2007 as compared with the quarter ended December 31, 2006. This increase largely
resulted from a $23.5 million increase in retail gas revenues coupled with an $8.2 million increase
in off-system sales revenues and a $6.5 million increase in transportation revenues. The increase
in retail gas
-21-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
sales revenues for the Utility segment was largely a function of higher gas costs (gas costs are
recovered dollar for dollar in revenues), coupled with the revenue impact of higher sales volumes,
as shown in the table above. The increase in transportation revenues was primarily due to a 2.0
Bcf increase in transportation throughput, largely due to the migration of retail sales customers
to transportation service.
As reported in 2006, on November 17, 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals vacated and remanded
FERCs Order No. 2004, its latest affiliate standards of conduct, with respect to natural gas
pipelines. The Courts decision became effective on January 5, 2007, and on January 9, 2007, FERC
issued Order No. 690, its Interim Rule, designed to respond to the Courts decision. In Order No.
690, as clarified by FERC on March 21, 2007, the FERC readopted, on an interim basis, certain
provisions that existed prior to the issuance of Order No. 2004 that had made it possible for the
Utility to engage in certain off-system sales without triggering the adverse consequences that
would otherwise arise under the standards of conduct. As such, the Utility resumed engaging in
off-system sales on non-affiliated pipelines as of May 2007. Total off-system sales revenues for
the quarter ended December 31, 2007 amounted to $8.2 million. Due to profit sharing with retail
customers, the margins resulting from off-system sales are minimal and there was no material impact
to margins for the quarter ended December 31, 2007.
The Utility segments earnings for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 were $20.2 million, an
increase of $3.0 million when compared with earnings of $17.2 million for the quarter ended
December 31, 2006. In the Pennsylvania jurisdiction, earnings increased $2.1 million. The major
factors contributing to this increase were the base rate increase effective January 1, 2007 ($2.0
million) and higher usage per account ($1.0 million). These increases were partly offset by the
negative earnings impact associated with warmer weather ($0.7 million). In the New York
jurisdiction, earnings increased $0.9 million. This increase was primarily the result of higher
usage per account.
The impact of weather variations on earnings in the New York jurisdiction is mitigated by that
jurisdictions WNC. The WNC in New York, which covers the eight-month period from October through
May, has had a stabilizing effect on earnings for the New York rate jurisdiction. For the quarters
ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the WNC preserved $1.1 million and $1.5 million of
earnings, respectively, since it was warmer than normal. In periods of colder than normal weather,
the WNC benefits Distribution Corporations New York customers.
Pipeline and Storage
Pipeline and Storage Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
Three Months Ended December 31 (Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Firm Transportation |
|
$ |
31,406 |
|
|
$ |
29,489 |
|
|
$ |
1,917 |
|
Interruptible Transportation |
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
32,397 |
|
|
|
30,434 |
|
|
|
1,963 |
|
|
Firm Storage Service |
|
|
16,621 |
|
|
|
16,402 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,213 |
|
|
|
3,341 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
52,231 |
|
|
$ |
50,177 |
|
|
$ |
2,054 |
|
|
Pipeline and Storage Throughput
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31 (MMcf) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Increase |
|
Firm Transportation |
|
|
92,883 |
|
|
|
74,427 |
|
|
|
18,456 |
|
Interruptible Transportation |
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
93,966 |
|
|
|
75,422 |
|
|
|
18,544 |
|
|
-22-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
2007 Compared with 2006
Operating revenues for the Pipeline and Storage segment increased $2.1 million in the quarter
ended December 31, 2007 as compared with the quarter ended December 31, 2006. This increase
consisted primarily of a $2.0 million increase in firm and interruptible transportation revenues.
The Pipeline and Storage segment was able to renew existing contracts at higher rates due to
favorable market conditions related to the demand for storage and the related transportation
service associated with storage. While transportation volumes increased by 18.5 Bcf, volume
fluctuations generally do not have a significant impact on revenues as a result of Supply
Corporations straight-fixed variable rate design.
The Pipeline and Storage segments earnings for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 were
$12.8 million, a decrease of $0.9 million when compared with earnings of $13.7 million for the
quarter ended December 31, 2006. The decrease is largely attributable to the non-recurrence of a
$1.9 million positive earnings impact associated with the discontinuance of hedge accounting for
Empires interest rate collar. On December 8, 2006, Empire repaid $22.8 million of secured debt.
The interest rate on that secured debt was hedged by an interest rate collar. Upon the repayment
of that debt, the corresponding interest rate collar no longer qualified for hedge accounting, and
the unrealized gain in accumulated other comprehensive income was reclassified to the income
statement in December 2006. Increased operating costs (primarily post-retirement benefit costs)
of $0.7 million, higher interest expense of $0.5 million and lower efficiency gas revenues of $0.2
million also contributed to the decrease in earnings. These earnings decreases were partially
offset by higher firm and interruptible transportation and storage service revenues ($1.4
million), lower depreciation expense ($0.8 million), and an increase in allowance for funds used
during construction ($0.4 million).
Exploration and Production
Exploration and Production Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
Three Months Ended December 31 (Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Gas (after Hedging) from Continuing Operations |
|
$ |
45,557 |
|
|
$ |
36,010 |
|
|
$ |
9,547 |
|
Oil (after Hedging) from Continuing Operations |
|
|
59,643 |
|
|
|
35,955 |
|
|
|
23,688 |
|
Gas Processing Plant from Continuing Operations |
|
|
11,075 |
|
|
|
8,629 |
|
|
|
2,446 |
|
Other from Continuing Operations |
|
|
(1,309 |
) |
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
(1,693 |
) |
Intrasegment Elimination from Continuing Operations (1) |
|
|
(7,011 |
) |
|
|
(5,850 |
) |
|
|
(1,161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenues from Continuing Operations |
|
$ |
107,955 |
|
|
$ |
75,128 |
|
|
$ |
32,827 |
|
|
Operating Revenues from Canada Discontinued
Operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,581 |
|
|
$ |
(13,581 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the elimination of certain West Coast gas production revenue included in
Gas (after Hedging) from Continuing Operations in the table above that was sold to the gas
processing plant shown in the table above. An elimination for the same dollar amount was made to
reduce the gas processing plants Purchased Gas expense. |
-23-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Production Volumes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
Three Months Ended December 31 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Gas Production (MMcf) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast |
|
|
2,826 |
|
|
|
2,723 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
West Coast |
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Appalachia |
|
|
1,917 |
|
|
|
1,394 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
Total Production from Continuing Operations |
|
|
5,770 |
|
|
|
5,061 |
|
|
|
709 |
|
Canada Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
(1,721 |
) |
|
Total Production |
|
|
5,770 |
|
|
|
6,782 |
|
|
|
(1,012 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil Production (Mbbl) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
West Coast |
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Appalachia |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Total Production from Continuing Operations |
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Canada Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
Total Production |
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
Average Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
Three Months Ended December 31 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Average Gas Price/Mcf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast |
|
$ |
7.14 |
|
|
$ |
6.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
West Coast |
|
$ |
6.77 |
|
|
$ |
6.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
Appalachia |
|
$ |
7.45 |
|
|
$ |
7.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
Weighted Average for Continuing Operations |
|
$ |
7.18 |
|
|
$ |
6.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
Weighted Average After Hedging for Continuing
Operations |
|
$ |
7.90 |
|
|
$ |
7.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
Canada Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6.39 |
|
|
$ |
(6.39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Oil Price/Bbl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast |
|
$ |
89.84 |
|
|
$ |
56.51 |
|
|
$ |
33.33 |
|
West Coast |
|
$ |
81.80 |
|
|
$ |
51.11 |
|
|
$ |
30.69 |
|
Appalachia |
|
$ |
84.12 |
|
|
$ |
59.78 |
|
|
$ |
24.34 |
|
Weighted Average for Continuing Operations |
|
$ |
83.43 |
|
|
$ |
52.73 |
|
|
$ |
30.70 |
|
Weighted Average After Hedging for Continuing
Operations |
|
$ |
72.59 |
|
|
$ |
43.82 |
|
|
$ |
28.77 |
|
Canada Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42.58 |
|
|
$ |
(42.58 |
) |
|
2007 Compared with 2006
Operating revenues from continuing operations for the Exploration and Production segment
increased $32.8 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as compared with the quarter ended
December 31, 2006. Oil production revenue after hedging increased $23.7 million. An increase in
the weighted average price of oil after hedging ($28.77 per bbl) was the primary cause, as
production increases in the West Coast and Appalachian regions offset a decrease in Gulf Coast
production, keeping overall oil production flat. Gas production revenue after hedging increased
$9.5 million. An increase in gas production (709 MMcf) and an increase in the weighted average
price of gas after hedging ($0.78 per Mcf) contributed similarly to the increase. The increase in
gas production occurred primarily in this segments Appalachian region (523 MMcf), consistent with
increased drilling activity in this region during fiscal 2007. Drilling activity will continue to
be significant in the Appalachian region in 2008.
-24-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
The Exploration and Production segments earnings from continuing operations for the quarter
ended December 31, 2007 were $34.0 million compared with earnings from continuing operations of
$16.9 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, an increase of $17.1 million. Higher crude
oil prices, higher natural gas prices and higher natural gas production increased earnings by $15.4
million, $2.9 million and $3.3 million, respectively. Higher interest income and lower interest
expense also increased earnings by $1.1 million and $1.2 million, respectively. These increases
were partially offset by increased depletion expense ($3.5 million), higher lease operating
expenses ($1.5 million) and higher state income tax expense ($1.1 million).
Energy Marketing
Energy Marketing Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
Three Months Ended December 31 (Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas (after Hedging) |
|
$ |
86,735 |
|
|
$ |
83,270 |
|
|
$ |
3,465 |
|
Other |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
86,719 |
|
|
$ |
83,318 |
|
|
$ |
3,401 |
|
|
Energy Marketing Volumes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Decrease |
|
Natural Gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
10,841 |
|
|
|
11,116 |
|
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
2007 Compared with 2006
Operating revenues for the Energy Marketing segment increased $3.4 million for the quarter
ended December 31, 2007 as compared with the quarter ended December 31, 2006. This increase
primarily reflects higher gas sales revenue due to an increase in the price of natural gas,
slightly offset by a decrease in throughput. The decrease in throughput was due to a decline in
volumes sold to certain low-margin wholesale and industrial customers.
The Energy Marketing segments earnings for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 were $1.0
million, an increase of $0.5 million when compared with earnings of $0.5 million for the quarter
ended December 31, 2006. Despite warmer weather, gross margin increased by $0.5 million due to
higher average margins per Mcf.
Timber
Timber Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
Three Months Ended December 31 (Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Log Sales |
|
$ |
5,174 |
|
|
$ |
4,065 |
|
|
$ |
1,109 |
|
Green Lumber Sales |
|
|
1,401 |
|
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
Kiln-dried Lumber Sales |
|
|
6,548 |
|
|
|
6,270 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
Other |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
(733 |
) |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
$ |
12,900 |
|
|
$ |
11,763 |
|
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
-25-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Timber Board Feet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31 (Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Log Sales |
|
|
2,024 |
|
|
|
1,709 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
Green Lumber Sales |
|
|
2,431 |
|
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
Kiln-dried Lumber Sales |
|
|
3,747 |
|
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,202 |
|
|
|
6,396 |
|
|
|
1,806 |
|
|
2007 Compared with 2006
Operating revenues for the Timber segment increased $1.1 million for the quarter ended
December 31, 2007 as compared with the quarter ended December 31, 2006. The increase in revenues
can be attributed mainly to slightly more favorable weather conditions in the quarter ended
December 31, 2007 as compared to unfavorable weather conditions that greatly diminished the
harvesting of logs during the quarter ended December 31, 2006. Since weather conditions were
somewhat more favorable during the current quarter, log sales increased by $1.1 million or 315,000
board feet. There was also an increase in both green lumber and kiln-dried lumber sales of $0.5
million and $0.3 million, respectively, since a larger amount of logs were available for processing
in the current quarter as compared to the quarter ended December 31, 2006. The increase in
kiln-dried lumber sales volumes was partially offset by a decline in market price of kiln-dried
lumber.
The Timber segments earnings for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 were $0.4 million, an
increase of $0.2 million when compared with earnings of $0.2 million for the quarter ended December
31, 2006. The increase was primarily due to higher margins from log and lumber sales of $0.2
million as a result of the increase in revenues noted above.
Corporate and All Other
2007 Compared with 2006
Corporate and All Other operations recorded earnings of $2.2 million for each of the quarters
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. Increases in earnings due to higher income from unconsolidated
subsidiaries of $0.7 million, lower interest expense of $0.8 million, higher interest income of
$0.5 million, and lower income tax expense ($0.4 million) were completely offset by higher
operating costs of $2.4 million.
Interest Income
Interest income was $2.0 million higher in the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as compared to
the quarter ended December 31, 2006. Interest income in the Exploration and Production segment
increased $1.6 million as a result of the investment of cash proceeds received from the sale of
SECI in August 2007.
Interest Charges
Interest on long-term debt increased $0.2 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as
compared with the quarter ended December 31, 2006. This increase can be attributed to the
non-recurrence of a $1.9 million benefit to interest expense recognized in the quarter ended
December 31, 2006 as a result of the discontinuance of hedge accounting for Empires interest rate
collar, as discussed above under Pipeline and Storage. The underlying long-term debt associated
with this interest rate collar was repaid during the quarter ended December 31, 2006 and the
unrealized gain recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income associated with the interest
rate collar was reclassified to interest expense. Largely offsetting this increase was an
overall decline in interest on long-term debt as
-26-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
a result of a lower average amount of long-term debt outstanding. As previously mentioned, the
Company repaid $22.8 million of Empires secured debt in December 2006. It also redeemed $96.3
million of 6.5% unsecured notes in April 2007.
Other interest charges were $1.1 million lower for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as
compared with the quarter ended December 31, 2006. The decrease resulted from a lower average
amount of short-term debt outstanding during the quarter ended December 31, 2007, lower other
interest charges in the Utility segment, and an increase in the allowance for borrowed funds used
during construction, primarily in the Pipeline and Storage segment.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
The Companys primary source of cash during the three-month period ended December 31, 2007
consisted of cash provided by operating activities. This source of cash was supplemented by
issuances of new shares of common stock as a result of stock option exercises. During the three
months ended December 31, 2007, the common stock used to fulfill the requirements of the Companys
401(k) plans and Direct Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan was obtained via open market
purchases. During fiscal 2006, the Company began repurchasing outstanding shares of its common
stock under a share repurchase program, which is discussed below under Financing Cash Flow.
Operating Cash Flow
Internally generated cash from operating activities consists of net income available for
common stock, adjusted for non-cash expenses, non-cash income and changes in operating assets and
liabilities. Non-cash items include depreciation, depletion and amortization, deferred income
taxes, and income or loss from unconsolidated subsidiaries net of cash distributions.
Cash provided by operating activities in the Utility and the Pipeline and Storage segments may
vary from period to period because of the impact of rate cases. In the Utility segment, over- or
under-recovered purchased gas costs and weather may also significantly impact cash flow. The
impact of weather on cash flow is tempered in the Utility segments New York rate jurisdiction by
its WNC and in the Pipeline and Storage segment by Supply Corporations straight fixed-variable
rate design.
Because of the seasonal nature of the heating business in the Utility and Energy Marketing
segments, revenues in these segments are relatively high during the heating season, primarily the
first and second quarters of the fiscal year, and receivable balances historically increase during
these periods from the balances receivable at September 30.
The storage gas inventory normally declines during the first and second quarters of the fiscal
year and is replenished during the third and fourth quarters. For storage gas inventory accounted
for under the LIFO method, the current cost of replacing gas withdrawn from storage is recorded in
the Consolidated Statements of Income and a reserve for gas replacement is recorded in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets under the caption Other Accruals and Current Liabilities. Such
reserve is reduced as the inventory is replenished.
Cash provided by operating activities in the Exploration and Production segment may vary from
period to period as a result of changes in the commodity prices of natural gas and crude oil. The
Company uses various derivative financial instruments, including price swap agreements and no cost
collars, options and futures contracts in an attempt to manage this energy commodity price risk.
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $75.3 million for the three months ended
December 31, 2007, an increase of $32.3 million when compared with the $43.0 million provided by
operating activities for the three months ended December 31, 2006. The timing of gas cost
recovery in the Utility segment for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the quarter
ended December 31, 2006 is primarily responsible for the increase. Higher cash receipts in the
Exploration and Production segment also contributed to the increase.
-27-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Investing Cash Flow
Expenditures for Long-Lived Assets
The Companys expenditures for long-lived assets totaled $69.7 million during the three months
ended December 31, 2007. The table below presents these expenditures:
Three Months Ended December 31, 2007
(in millions of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Expenditures for |
|
|
Long-Lived Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility |
|
$ |
12.7 |
|
Pipeline and Storage |
|
|
25.3 |
|
Exploration and Production |
|
|
30.7 |
|
Timber |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
69.7 |
|
|
Utility
The majority of the Utility capital expenditures for the three months ended December 31, 2007
were made for replacement of mains and main extensions, as well as for the replacement of service
lines.
Pipeline and Storage
The majority of the Pipeline and Storage capital expenditures for the three months ended
December 31, 2007 were related to the Empire Connector project costs, which is discussed below.
The Company continues to explore various opportunities to expand its capabilities to transport
gas to the East Coast, either through the Supply Corporation or Empire systems or in partnership
with others. Construction of the Empire Connector, a pipeline which will connect the Empire
Pipeline with the Millennium Pipeline and which is designed to transport up to approximately 250
MDth of natural gas per day, began in September 2007. The planned in-service date is November
2008. Refer to the Rate and Regulatory Matters section that follows for further discussion of this
matter. The total cost to the Company of the Empire Connector project is estimated at $177
million, after giving effect to sales tax exemptions worth approximately $3.7 million. The Company
anticipates financing this project with cash on hand and/or through the use of the Companys lines
of credit. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had incurred approximately $44.8 million in costs
related to this project. Of this amount, $25.1 million and $0.4 million were incurred during the
quarters ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. All project costs incurred
as of December 31, 2007, have been capitalized as either Construction Work in Progress ($37.7
million) or Materials and Supplies Inventory ($7.1 million), as per the accounting guidance in the
FERCs Uniform System of Accounts and SFAS 71.
Supply Corporation continues to view its potential Tuscarora Extension project as an important
link to Millennium and potential storage development in the Corning, New York area. This new
pipeline, which would expand the Supply Corporation system from its Tuscarora storage field to the
intersection of the proposed Millennium and Empire Connector pipelines, could be designed initially
to transport up to approximately 130 MDth of natural gas per day. It may also provide Supply
Corporation with the opportunity to increase the deliverability of the existing Tuscarora storage
field. Using the results of a completed Open Season, Supply Corporation is also exploring a new
project (the West to East project) that would provide for new capacity from the Rockies Express
Project, Appalachian production, storage and other points to Leidy and to interconnections with
Millennium and Empire at Corning. The West to East project could include the Tuscarora Extension
project, or could be a second phase following the development of the Tuscarora Extension project.
-28-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Supply Corporation has plans to develop new storage capacity by pursuing expansion of its East
Branch and Galbraith storage facilities. The expansion of these two fields, which Supply
Corporation hopes to market through one offering at market-based rates, could provide approximately
7 Bcf of incremental storage capacity with incremental withdrawal deliverability of up to 80 MDth
of natural gas per day, available in 2011. Supply Corporation expects that the availability of
this incremental storage capacity will complement the West to East pipeline project and help meet
the demand for storage created by the prospective increased flow of Rockies gas supply into the
western Pennsylvania area, although traditional gas supplies will also be able to take advantage of
this incremental storage capacity. An Open Season for this capacity is expected in 2008.
The timeline associated with Supply Corporations pipeline and storage projects depends on
market development. Should the market materialize, the Company anticipates financing the Tuscarora
Extension project and/or the East Branch/Galbraith expansion(s) with cash on hand and/or through
the use of the Companys lines of credit. The capital cost of the West to East project could
amount to $700 million, which would be financed by a combination of debt and equity. There have
been no costs incurred by the Company related to either pipeline project as of December 31, 2007.
Approximately $0.2 million has been spent to study the East Branch/Galbraith project as of December
31, 2007. The Company has not yet filed an application with the FERC for the authority to build
either pipeline project or the storage expansion(s).
Exploration and Production
The Exploration and Production segment capital expenditures for the three months ended
December 31, 2007 included approximately $6.8 million for the Gulf Coast region, substantially all
of which was for the off-shore program in the Gulf of Mexico, $12.8 million for the West Coast
region and $11.1 million for the Appalachian region. These amounts included approximately $4.5
million spent to develop proved undeveloped reserves.
Timber
The majority of the Timber segment capital expenditures for the three months ended December
31, 2007 were for construction of a lumber sorter for Highlands sawmill operations that was placed
into service in October 2007 as well as for purchases of equipment for Highlands sawmill and kiln
operations.
The Company continuously evaluates capital expenditures and investments in corporations,
partnerships, and other business entities. The amounts are subject to modification for
opportunities such as the acquisition of attractive oil and gas properties, timber or natural gas
storage facilities and the expansion of natural gas transmission line capacities. While the
majority of capital expenditures in the Utility segment are necessitated by the continued need for
replacement and upgrading of mains and service lines, the magnitude of future capital expenditures
or other investments in the Companys other business segments depends, to a large degree, upon
market conditions.
Financing Cash Flow
The Company did not have any outstanding short-term notes payable to banks or commercial paper
at December 31, 2007. However, the Company continues to consider short-term debt (consisting of
short-term notes payable to banks and commercial paper) an important source of cash for temporarily
financing capital expenditures and investments in corporations and/or partnerships, gas-in-storage
inventory, unrecovered purchased gas costs, margin calls on derivative financial instruments,
exploration and development expenditures, repurchases of stock, and other working capital needs.
Fluctuations in these items can have a significant impact on the amount and timing of short-term
debt. As for bank loans, the Company maintains a number of individual uncommitted or discretionary
lines of credit with certain financial institutions for general corporate purposes. Borrowings
under these lines of credit are made at competitive market rates. These credit lines, which
aggregate to $455.0 million, are revocable at the option of the financial institutions and are
reviewed on an annual basis. The Company anticipates that these lines of credit will continue
to be renewed, or replaced by similar lines. The total amount
-29-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
available to be issued under the Companys commercial paper program is $300.0 million. The
commercial paper program is backed by a syndicated committed credit facility totaling $300.0
million that extends through September 30, 2010.
Under the Companys committed credit facility, the Company has agreed that its debt to
capitalization ratio will not exceed .65 at the last day of any fiscal quarter through September
30, 2010. At December 31, 2007, the Companys debt to capitalization ratio (as calculated under
the facility) was .37. The constraints specified in the committed credit facility would permit an
additional $2.14 billion in short-term and/or long-term debt to be outstanding (further limited by
the indenture covenants discussed below) before the Companys debt to capitalization ratio would
exceed .65. If a downgrade in any of the Companys credit ratings were to occur, access to the
commercial paper markets might not be possible. However, the Company expects that it could borrow
under its uncommitted bank lines of credit or rely upon other liquidity sources, including cash
provided by operations.
Under the Companys existing indenture covenants, at December 31, 2007, the Company would have
been permitted to issue up to a maximum of $1.5 billion in additional long-term unsecured
indebtedness at then-current market interest rates in addition to being able to issue new
indebtedness to replace maturing debt. The Companys present liquidity position is believed to be
adequate to satisfy known demands.
The Companys 1974 indenture, pursuant to which $399.0 million (or 40%) of the Companys
long-term debt (as of December 31, 2007) was issued, contains a cross-default provision whereby the
failure by the Company to perform certain obligations under other borrowing arrangements could
trigger an obligation to repay the debt outstanding under the indenture. In particular, a
repayment obligation could be triggered if the Company fails (i) to pay any scheduled principal or
interest on any debt under any other indenture or agreement or (ii) to perform any other term in
any other such indenture or agreement, and the effect of the failure causes, or would permit the
holders of the debt to cause, the debt under such indenture or agreement to become due prior to its
stated maturity, unless cured or waived.
The Companys $300.0 million committed credit facility also contains a cross-default provision
whereby the failure by the Company or its significant subsidiaries to make payments under other
borrowing arrangements, or the occurrence of certain events affecting those other borrowing
arrangements, could trigger an obligation to repay any amounts outstanding under the committed
credit facility. In particular, a repayment obligation could be triggered if (i) the Company or
any of its significant subsidiaries fail to make a payment when due of any principal or interest on
any other indebtedness aggregating $20.0 million or more or (ii) an event occurs that causes, or
would permit the holders of any other indebtedness aggregating $20.0 million or more to cause, such
indebtedness to become due prior to its stated maturity. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had
no debt outstanding under the committed credit facility.
The Company has an effective registration statement on file with the SEC under which it has
available capacity to issue an additional $550.0 million of debt and equity securities under the
Securities Act of 1933. The Company may sell all or a portion of the remaining registered
securities if warranted by market conditions and the Companys capital requirements. Any offer and
sale of the above mentioned $550.0 million of debt and equity securities will be made only by means
of a prospectus meeting the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the rules and
regulations thereunder.
The amounts and timing of the issuance and sale of debt or equity securities will depend on
market conditions, indenture requirements, regulatory authorizations and the capital requirements
of the Company.
On December 8, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the Company to implement a
share repurchase program, whereby the Company may repurchase outstanding shares of common stock, up
to an aggregate amount of 8 million shares in the open market or through privately negotiated
transactions. As of December 31, 2007, the Company has repurchased 3,834,878 shares for $133.2
million under this program. There were no share repurchases under this program during the
quarter
-30-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
ended December 31, 2007. These share repurchases were funded with cash provided by operating
activities and/or through the use of the Companys lines of credit. In the future, it is expected
that this share repurchase program will continue to be funded with cash provided by operating
activities and/or through the use of the Companys lines of credit. It is expected that open
market repurchases will continue from time to time depending on market conditions.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Company has entered into certain off-balance sheet financing arrangements. These
financing arrangements are primarily operating and capital leases. The Companys consolidated
subsidiaries have operating leases, the majority of which are with the Utility and the Pipeline and
Storage segments, having a remaining lease commitment of approximately $33.8 million. These leases
have been entered into for the use of buildings, vehicles, construction tools, meters and other
items and are accounted for as operating leases. The Companys unconsolidated subsidiaries, which
are accounted for under the equity method, have capital leases of electric generating equipment
having a remaining lease commitment of approximately $4.5 million. The Company has guaranteed 50%
or $2.3 million of these capital lease commitments.
OTHER MATTERS
In addition to the legal proceedings disclosed in Part II, Item 1 of this report, the Company
is involved in other litigation and regulatory matters arising in the normal course of business.
These other matters may include, for example, negligence claims and tax, regulatory or other
governmental audits, inspections, investigations or other proceedings. These matters may involve
state and federal taxes, safety, compliance with regulations, rate base, cost of service and
purchased gas cost issues, among other things. While these normal-course matters could have a
material effect on earnings and cash flows in the quarterly and annual period in which they are
resolved, they are not expected to change materially the Companys present liquidity position, nor
to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company.
Market Risk Sensitive Instruments
For a complete discussion of market risk sensitive instruments, refer to Market Risk
Sensitive Instruments in Item 7 of the Companys 2007 Form 10-K. There have been no subsequent
material changes to the Companys exposure to market risk sensitive instruments.
Rate and Regulatory Matters
Utility Operation
Base rate adjustments in both the New York and Pennsylvania jurisdictions do not reflect the
recovery of purchased gas costs. Such costs are recovered through operation of the purchased gas
adjustment clauses of the appropriate regulatory authorities.
New York Jurisdiction
On January 29, 2007, Distribution Corporation commenced a rate case by filing proposed tariff
amendments and supporting testimony requesting approval to increase its annual revenues by $52.0
million. Following standard procedure, the NYPSC suspended the proposed tariff amendments to
enable its staff and intervenors to conduct a routine investigation and hold hearings.
Distribution Corporation explained in the filing that its request for rate relief was necessitated
by decreased revenues resulting from customer conservation efforts and increased customer
uncollectibles, among other things. The rate filing also included a proposal for an aggressive
efficiency and conservation initiative with a revenue decoupling mechanism designed to render the
Company indifferent to throughput reductions resulting from conservation. On September 20, 2007,
the NYPSC issued an order approving, with modifications,
-31-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
the Companys conservation program for implementation on an accelerated basis. Associated
ratemaking issues, however, were reserved for consideration in the rate case. On September 28,
2007, an administrative law judge assigned to the proceeding issued a recommended decision (RD)
based on a review and analysis of the evidence presented in the case. On December 21, 2007, the
NYPSC issued an Order adopting some provisions of the RD and modifying others. The Order provides
for an annual rate increase of $1.8 million, together with a monthly bill surcharge that would
collect up to $10.8 million to recover expenses arising from the conservation program. The rate
increase and bill surcharge became effective December 28, 2007. The Order further provides for a
return on equity of 9.1%. As recommended in the RD, the Order also approved the Companys proposed
revenue decoupling mechanism.
Pennsylvania Jurisdiction
On June 1, 2006, Distribution Corporation filed proposed tariff amendments with PaPUC to
increase annual revenues by $25.9 million to cover increases in the cost of service to be effective
July 30, 2006. The rate request was filed to address increased costs associated with Distribution
Corporations ongoing construction program as well as increases in operating costs, particularly
uncollectible accounts. Following standard regulatory procedure, the PaPUC issued an order on July
20, 2006 instituting a rate proceeding and suspending the proposed tariff amendments until March 2,
2007. On October 2, 2006, the parties, including Distribution Corporation, Staff of the PaPUC and
intervenors, executed an agreement (Settlement) proposing to settle all issues in the rate
proceeding. The Settlement includes an increase in annual revenues of $14.3 million to non-gas
revenues, an agreement not to file a rate case until January 28, 2008 at the earliest and an early
implementation date. The Settlement was approved by the PaPUC at its meeting on November 30, 2006,
and the new rates became effective January 1, 2007.
On June 8, 2006, the NTSB issued safety recommendations to Distribution Corporation, the PaPUC
and certain other parties as a result of an investigation of a natural gas explosion that occurred
on Distribution Corporations system in Dubois, Pennsylvania in August 2004. The explosion
destroyed a residence, resulting in the death of two people who lived there, and damaged a number
of other houses in the immediate vicinity. Without admitting liability, Distribution Corporation
settled all significant third-party claims against it related to the explosion.
The NTSBs safety recommendations to Distribution Corporation involved revisions to its
butt-fusion procedures for joining plastic pipe, and revisions to its procedures for qualifying
personnel who perform plastic fusions. Although not required by law to do so, Distribution
Corporation implemented those recommendations. In December 2006, the NTSB classified its
recommendations as closed after determining that Distribution Corporation took acceptable action
with respect to the recommendations.
The NTSBs recommendation to the PaPUC was to require an analysis of the integrity of
butt-fusion joints in Distribution Corporations system and replacement of those joints that are
determined to have unacceptable characteristics. Distribution Corporation has worked cooperatively
with the Staff of the PaPUC to permit the PaPUC to undertake the analysis recommended by the NTSB.
In late November 2007, Distribution Corporation reached a Settlement Agreement with the Law
Bureau Prosecutory Staff of the PaPUC (the Law Bureau) regarding the explosion and the PaPUCs
subsequent investigation. The Law Bureau and Distribution Corporation jointly submitted the
Settlement Agreement to the PaPUC for approval. Distribution Corporation anticipates that the PaPUC
will review the Settlement Agreement in the first quarter of calendar 2008. In the Settlement
Agreement, Distribution Corporation agrees, without admitting liability, to pay a $50,000 fine and
to fund an additional $30,000 of safety-related activities. Distribution Corporation also agrees to
make various improvements to its butt-fusion procedures and to implement a program to review
existing butt-fusions.
-32-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Pipeline and Storage
Supply Corporation currently does not have a rate case on file with the FERC. The rate
settlement approved by the FERC on February 9, 2007 requires Supply Corporation to make a general
rate filing to be effective December 1, 2011, and bars Supply Corporation from making a general
rate filing before then, with some exceptions specified in the settlement.
Empire currently does not have a rate case on file with the NYPSC. Among the issues resolved
in connection with Empires FERC application to build the Empire Connector are the rates and terms
of service that will become applicable to all of Empires business, effective upon Empire
constructing and placing its new facilities into service (currently expected for November 2008). At
that time, Empire will become an interstate pipeline subject to FERC regulation. The order
described in the following paragraph requires Empire to make a filing at FERC within three years
after the in-service date justifying Empires existing recourse rates or proposing alternative
rates.
On December 21, 2006, the FERC issued an order granting a Certificate of Public Convenience
and Necessity authorizing the construction and operation of the Empire Connector and various other
related pipeline projects by other unaffiliated companies. The Empire Certificate contains various
environmental and other conditions. Empire has accepted that Certificate. Additional environmental
permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and state environmental agencies have been received.
Empire has also received, from all six upstate New York counties in which it would build the Empire
Connector project, final approval of sales tax exemptions and temporary partial property tax
abatements necessary to enable the Empire Connector to generate a fair return. In June 2007, Empire
signed a firm transportation service agreement with KeySpan Gas East Corporation, under which
Empire is obligated to provide transportation service that will require construction of this
project. Construction began in September 2007 and is planned to be complete by November 1, 2008.
Environmental Matters
The Company is subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to
the protection of the environment. The Company has established procedures for the ongoing
evaluation of its operations to identify potential environmental exposures and comply with
regulatory policies and procedures. It is the Companys policy to accrue estimated environmental
clean-up costs (investigation and remediation) when such amounts can reasonably be estimated and it
is probable that the Company will be required to incur such costs.
The Company received, in 1998 and again in October 1999, notice that the NYDEC believes the
Company is responsible for contamination discovered at a former manufactured gas plant site located
in New York for which the Company had not been named as a PRP. In February 2007, the NYDEC
identified the Company as a PRP for the site and issued a proposed remedial action plan. The NYDEC
estimated clean-up costs under its proposed remedy to be $8.9 million if implemented. Although the
Company commented to the NYDEC that the proposed remedial action plan contained a number of
material errors, omissions and procedural defects, the NYDEC, in a March 2007 Record of Decision,
selected the remedy it had previously proposed. In July 2007, the Company appealed the NYDECs
Record of Decision to the New York State Supreme Court, Albany County. The Court dismissed the
appeal in January 2008. The Company is reviewing its options in this matter and believes that a
negotiated resolution with the NYDEC regarding the site remains possible.
At December 31, 2007, the Company has estimated its remaining clean-up costs related to former
manufactured gas plant sites and third party waste disposal sites (including the former
manufactured gas plant site discussed above) will be in the range of $12.1 million to $15.8
million. The minimum estimated liability of $12.1 million has been recorded on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet at December 31, 2007. The Company expects to recover its environmental clean-up
costs from a combination of rate recovery and insurance proceeds.
-33-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
The Company is currently not aware of any material additional exposure to environmental
liabilities. However, changes in environmental regulations or other factors could adversely
impact the Company.
New Accounting Pronouncements
On October 1, 2007, the Company adopted FIN 48. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income
taxes by prescribing a minimum probability threshold that a tax position must meet before a
financial statement benefit is recognized. The minimum threshold is defined in FIN 48 as a tax
position that is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing
authority, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the
technical merits of the position. If a tax benefit meets this threshold, it is measured and
recognized based on an analysis of the cumulative probability of the tax benefit being ultimately
sustained. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements. For further discussion of the impact of adopting FIN 48, refer to Part I,
Item 1 at Note 2 Income Taxes.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157. SFAS 157 provides guidance for using fair value
to measure assets and liabilities. The pronouncement serves to clarify the extent to which
companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value,
and the effect that fair-value measurements have on earnings. SFAS 157 is to be applied whenever
another standard requires or allows assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The
pronouncement is effective for financial assets and financial
liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a
recurring basis as of the Companys first quarter of
fiscal 2009. The pronouncement is effective for nonfinancial assets
and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized
or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis, as of the
Companys first quarter of fiscal 2010. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS 157 will have on its consolidated
financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB also issued SFAS 158, an amendment of SFAS 87, SFAS 88, SFAS 106,
and SFAS 132R. SFAS 158 requires that companies recognize a net liability or asset to report the
underfunded or overfunded status of their defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit
plans on their balance sheets, as well as recognize changes in the funded status of a defined
benefit post-retirement plan in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income.
The pronouncement also specifies that a plans assets and obligations that determine its funded
status be measured as of the end of the Companys fiscal year, with limited exceptions. In
accordance with SFAS 158, the Company has recognized the funded status of its benefit plans and
implemented the disclosure requirements of SFAS 158 at September 30, 2007. The requirement to
measure the plan assets and benefit obligations as of the Companys fiscal year-end date will be
adopted by the Company by the end of fiscal 2009. Currently, the Company measures its plan assets
and benefit obligations using a June 30th measurement date.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159. SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure
many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not otherwise required to
be measured at fair value under GAAP. A company that elects the fair value option for an eligible
item will be required to recognize in current earnings any changes in that items fair value in
reporting periods subsequent to the date of adoption. SFAS 159 is effective as of the Companys
first quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the
adoption of SFAS 159 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R. SFAS 141R will significantly change the
accounting for business combinations in a number of areas including the treatment of contingent
consideration, contingencies, acquisition costs, in process research and development and
restructuring costs. In addition, under SFAS 141R, changes in deferred tax asset valuation
allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties in a business combination after the measurement
period will impact income tax expense. SFAS 141R is effective as of the Companys first quarter of
fiscal 2010.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160. SFAS 160 will change the accounting and reporting
for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests (NCI) and
classified as a component of equity. This new consolidation method will significantly change the
accounting for transactions with minority interest holders. SFAS 160 is effective as of the
Companys first quarter of fiscal 2010. The Company currently does not have any NCI.
-34-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements
The Company is including the following cautionary statement in this Form 10-Q to make
applicable and take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 for any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, the Company.
Forward-looking statements include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, projections,
strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements which are
other than statements of historical facts. From time to time, the Company may publish or otherwise
make available forward-looking statements of this nature. All such subsequent forward-looking
statements, whether written or oral and whether made by or on behalf of the Company, are also
expressly qualified by these cautionary statements. Certain statements contained in this report,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future prospects, plans, performance and
capital structure, anticipated capital expenditures, completion of construction projects,
projections for pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations, impacts of the adoption of
new accounting rules, and possible outcomes of litigation or regulatory proceedings, as well as
statements that are identified by the use of the words anticipates, estimates, expects,
forecasts, intends, plans, predicts, projects, believes, seeks, will, may, and
similar expressions, are forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and accordingly involve risks and uncertainties which could cause
actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking
statements. The forward-looking statements contained herein are based on various assumptions, many
of which are based, in turn, upon further assumptions. The Companys expectations, beliefs and
projections are expressed in good faith and are believed by the Company to have a reasonable basis,
including, without limitation, managements examination of historical operating trends, data
contained in the Companys records and other data available from third parties, but there can be no
assurance that managements expectations, beliefs or projections will result or be achieved or
accomplished. In addition to other factors and matters discussed elsewhere herein, the following
are important factors that, in the view of the Company, could cause actual results to differ
materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements:
1. |
|
Changes in economic conditions, including economic disruptions caused by terrorist
activities, acts of war or major accidents; |
|
2. |
|
Changes in demographic patterns and weather conditions, including the occurrence of severe
weather such as hurricanes; |
|
3. |
|
Changes in the availability and/or price of natural gas or oil and the effect of such
changes on the accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments or the valuation of
the Companys natural gas and oil reserves; |
|
4. |
|
Uncertainty of oil and gas reserve estimates; |
|
5. |
|
Ability to successfully identify, drill for and produce economically viable natural gas and
oil reserves; |
|
6. |
|
Significant changes from expectations in the Companys actual production levels for natural
gas or oil; |
|
7. |
|
Changes in the availability and/or price of derivative financial instruments; |
|
8. |
|
Changes in the price differentials between various types of oil; |
|
9. |
|
Inability to obtain new customers or retain existing ones; |
|
10. |
|
Significant changes in competitive factors affecting the Company; |
|
11. |
|
Changes in laws and regulations to which the Company is subject, including changes in tax,
environmental, safety and employment laws and regulations; |
-35-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Concl.)
12. |
|
Governmental/regulatory actions, initiatives and proceedings, including those involving
acquisitions, financings, rate cases (which address, among other things, allowed rates of
return, rate design and retained gas), affiliate relationships, industry structure, franchise
renewal, and environmental/safety requirements; |
|
13. |
|
Unanticipated impacts of restructuring initiatives in the natural gas and electric
industries; |
|
14. |
|
Significant changes from expectations in actual capital expenditures and operating expenses
and unanticipated project delays or changes in project costs or plans; |
|
15. |
|
The nature and projected profitability of pending and potential projects and other
investments, and the ability to obtain necessary governmental approvals and permits; |
|
16. |
|
Occurrences affecting the Companys ability to obtain funds from operations, from borrowings
under our credit lines or other credit facilities or from issuances of other short-term notes
or debt or equity securities to finance needed capital expenditures and other investments,
including any downgrades in the Companys credit ratings; |
|
17. |
|
Ability to successfully identify and finance acquisitions or other investments and ability to
operate and integrate existing and any subsequently acquired business or properties; |
|
18. |
|
Impairments under the SECs full cost ceiling test for natural gas and oil reserves; |
|
19. |
|
Significant changes in tax rates or policies or in rates of inflation or interest; |
|
20. |
|
Significant changes in the Companys relationship with its employees or contractors and the
potential adverse effects if labor disputes, grievances or shortages were to occur; |
|
21. |
|
Changes in accounting principles or the application of such principles to the Company; |
|
22. |
|
The cost and effects of legal and administrative claims against the Company; |
|
23. |
|
Changes in actuarial assumptions and the return on assets with respect to the Companys
retirement plan and post-retirement benefit plans; |
|
24. |
|
Increasing health care costs and the resulting effect on health insurance premiums and on the
obligation to provide post-retirement benefits; or |
|
25. |
|
Increasing costs of insurance, changes in coverage and the ability to obtain insurance. |
The Company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect
events or circumstances after the date hereof.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Refer to the Market Risk Sensitive Instruments section in Item 2 MD&A.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The term disclosure controls and procedures is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act. These rules refer to the controls and other procedures of a company that
are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that
it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures
include, without
-36-
Item 4. Controls and Procedures (Concl.)
limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed is
accumulated and communicated to the companys management, including its principal executive and
principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. The Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2007.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the quarter ended December 31, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In an action instituted in the New York State Supreme Court, Kings County on February 18, 2003
against Distribution Corporation and Paul J. Hissin, an unaffiliated third party, plaintiff Donna
Fordham-Coleman, as administratrix of the estate of Velma Arlene Fordham, alleges that Distribution
Corporations failure to initiate natural gas service, despite an attempt to do so, at an apartment
leased to the plaintiffs decedent, Velma Arlene Fordham, caused the decedents death in February
2001. The plaintiff sought damages for wrongful death and pain and suffering, plus punitive
damages. Distribution Corporation denied plaintiffs material allegations, asserted seven
affirmative defenses and asserted a cross-claim against the co-defendant. Distribution Corporation
believes, and has vigorously asserted, that plaintiffs allegations lack merit. The court changed
venue of the action to New York State Supreme Court, Erie County. Trial was scheduled to begin
October 15, 2007. However, the parties resolved the action.
On June 8, 2006, the NTSB issued safety recommendations to Distribution Corporation, the PaPUC
and certain others as a result of its investigation of a natural gas explosion that occurred on
Distribution Corporations system in Dubois, Pennsylvania in August 2004. For a discussion of this
matter, refer to Part II, Item 7 MD&A of this report under the heading Other Matters Rate and
Regulatory Matters.
On November 8, 2007, Distribution Corporation filed a complaint with the PaPUC requesting that
the PaPUC commence an investigation to determine whether New Mountain Vantage GP, L.L.C. (New
Mountain), and others acting in concert with it, had violated Pennsylvania law by acquiring control
of Distribution Corporation without the prior approval of the PaPUC. Distribution Corporation also
petitioned the PaPUC for an order requiring New Mountain to show cause why it should not be
required to apply for and receive a certificate of public convenience prior to acquiring control of
Distribution Corporation. On December 19, 2007, Distribution Corporation filed a petition with the
NYPSC seeking relief in a form and manner substantially similar to the order sought in
Pennsylvania. Pursuant to an agreement dated January 24, 2008 among the Company, New Mountain and
certain affiliates of New Mountain, Distribution Corporation filed motions to withdraw the
complaint and petitions filed with the PaPUC and NYPSC. The NYPSC granted the motion on January
30, 2008; however, the motion before the PaPUC remains pending.
The resolution of the Fordham-Coleman action described above did not have a material effect on
the consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or cash flow of the Company. Although
no assurances can be given, the Company believes, based on the information presently known, that
the ultimate resolution of the matters before the PaPUC and NYPSC described above will not be
material to the consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or cash flow of the
Company.
-37-
Item 1. Legal Proceedings (Concl.)
For a discussion of various environmental and other matters, refer to Part I, Item 1 at Note 4
Commitments and Contingencies, and Part I, Item 2 MD&A of this report under the heading
Other Matters Environmental Matters.
In addition to the matters disclosed above, the Company is involved in other litigation and
regulatory matters arising in the normal course of business. These other matters may include, for
example, negligence claims and tax, regulatory or other governmental audits, inspections,
investigations or other proceedings. These matters may involve state and federal taxes, safety,
compliance with regulations, rate base, cost of service, and purchased gas cost issues, among other
things. While these normal-course matters could have a material effect on earnings and cash flows
in the quarterly and annual period in which they are resolved, they are not expected to change
materially the Companys present liquidity position, nor to have a material adverse effect on the
financial condition of the Company.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
For a discussion of risk factors, refer to Risk Factors in Item 1A of the Companys 2007
Form 10-K. There have been no subsequent material changes to that disclosure.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On October 1, 2007, the Company issued a total of 2,400 unregistered shares of Company common
stock to the eight non-employee directors of the Company serving on the Board of Directors, 300
shares to each such director. All of these unregistered shares were issued as partial
consideration for such directors services during the quarter ended December 31, 2007, pursuant to
the Companys Retainer Policy for Non-Employee Directors. These transactions were exempt from
registration by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as transactions not involving a public
offering.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
of Shares that May |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Announced Share |
|
Under Share |
|
|
Shares |
|
Average Price |
|
Repurchase Plans |
|
Repurchase Plans |
Period |
|
Purchased (a) |
|
Paid per Share |
|
or Programs |
|
or Programs(b) |
Oct. 1-31, 2007 |
|
|
8,768 |
|
|
$ |
47.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,165,122 |
|
Nov. 1-30, 2007 |
|
|
28,356 |
|
|
$ |
47.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,165,122 |
|
Dec. 1-31, 2007 |
|
|
23,559 |
|
|
$ |
47.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,165,122 |
|
Total |
|
|
60,683 |
|
|
$ |
47.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,165,122 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents (i) shares of common stock of the Company purchased on the open market
with Company matching contributions for the accounts of participants in the Companys 401(k)
plans, and (ii) shares of common stock of the Company tendered to the Company by holders of
stock options or shares of restricted stock for the payment of option exercise prices or
applicable withholding taxes. During the quarter ended December 31, 2007, the Company did not
purchase any shares of its common stock pursuant to its publicly announced share repurchase
program. Of the 60,683 shares purchased other than through a publicly announced share
repurchase program, 21,836 were purchased for the Companys 401(k) plans and 38,847 were
purchased as a result of shares tendered to the Company by holders of stock options or shares
of restricted stock. |
|
(b) |
|
On December 8, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of
up to eight million shares of the Companys common stock. Repurchases may be made from time to
time in the open market or through private transactions. |
-38-
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
On January 24, 2008, the Company and New Mountain Vantage GP, L.L.C. and its affiliates
entered into an agreement to settle a proxy contest pertaining to the election of directors to the
Companys Board of Directors at the Companys Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on February
21, 2008. A description of the terms of the settlement is included in the Companys Schedule 14A
filed with the SEC on January 30, 2008, and such description is incorporated herein by reference.
The description of the settlement agreement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full
text of the settlement agreement, which is attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report
on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 24, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Material Contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of Employment Continuation and Noncompetition Agreement among
the Company, a subsidiary of the Company and Karen M. Camiolo
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1, Form 10-K for fiscal
year ended September 30, 2007 in File No. 1-3380). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Description of performance goals for certain executive officers
under the National Fuel Gas Company 2007 Annual At Risk Compensation Incentive
Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Statements regarding Computation of Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges for the Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2007 and the Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2003
through 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Written statements of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Written statements of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
National Fuel Gas Company Consolidated Statement of Income for the
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. |
-39-
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY
(Registrant)
|
|
|
/s/ R. J. Tanski
|
|
|
R. J. Tanski |
|
|
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer |
|
|
|
/s/ K. M. Camiolo
|
|
|
K. M. Camiolo |
|
|
Controller and Principal Accounting Officer |
|
|
|
|
Date: February 8, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
-40-