FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-9172
NACCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
34-1505819 |
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
5875 LANDERBROOK DRIVE, CLEVELAND, OHIO
|
|
44124-4069 |
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(440) 449-9600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES o NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
YES o NO þ
Number of shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding at April 29, 2009 6,684,176
Number of shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding at April 29, 2009 1,604,396
NACCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
Part I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
NACCO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARCH 31 |
|
|
DECEMBER 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions, except share data) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
155.8 |
|
|
$ |
138.3 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
294.9 |
|
|
|
419.2 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
452.5 |
|
|
|
480.2 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
64.5 |
|
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
1,001.8 |
|
|
|
1,141.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net |
|
|
346.5 |
|
|
|
358.9 |
|
Coal Supply Agreements and Other Intangibles, Net |
|
|
65.9 |
|
|
|
66.7 |
|
Long-term Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
Other Non-current Assets |
|
|
113.0 |
|
|
|
99.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
1,550.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,687.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
265.7 |
|
|
$ |
376.4 |
|
Revolving credit agreements not guaranteed by the parent company |
|
|
66.0 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt not guaranteed by the parent company |
|
|
48.7 |
|
|
|
42.6 |
|
Accrued payroll |
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
34.2 |
|
Accrued warranty |
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
|
46.3 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
126.2 |
|
|
|
151.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
582.2 |
|
|
|
675.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt not guaranteed by the parent company |
|
|
380.6 |
|
|
|
400.5 |
|
Pension and other Post-retirement Obligations |
|
|
98.2 |
|
|
|
100.9 |
|
Other Long-term Liabilities |
|
|
148.1 |
|
|
|
154.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
1,209.1 |
|
|
|
1,331.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A, par value $1 per share, 6,684,175 shares
outstanding (2008 - 6,680,652 shares outstanding) |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Class B, par value $1 per share, convertible into Class A on a
one-for-one basis, 1,604,397 shares outstanding
(2008 - 1,605,226 shares outstanding) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
385.9 |
|
|
|
399.3 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
Deferred loss on cash flow hedging |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
Pension and post-retirement plan adjustment |
|
|
(72.5 |
) |
|
|
(73.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
340.7 |
|
|
|
356.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling Interest |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
340.9 |
|
|
|
356.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Equity |
|
$ |
1,550.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,687.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
NACCO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
|
|
MARCH 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
558.6 |
|
|
$ |
865.0 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
472.8 |
|
|
|
732.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
85.8 |
|
|
|
132.3 |
|
Earnings of unconsolidated project mining subsidiaries |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
98.1 |
|
|
|
124.2 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97.1 |
|
|
|
124.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Profit (Loss) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Income (loss) from other unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
1.8 |
|
Other |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
8.1 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
(9.1 |
) |
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
(11.9 |
) |
|
$ |
13.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Share |
|
$ |
(1.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per Share |
|
$ |
0.5150 |
|
|
$ |
0.5000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |
|
|
8.287 |
|
|
|
8.275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |
|
|
8.287 |
|
|
|
8.282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
NACCO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
|
|
MARCH 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(9.1 |
) |
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)
to net cash used for operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing fees |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
|
Working capital changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
120.8 |
|
|
|
35.6 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
(54.9 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
(16.0 |
) |
|
|
(27.1 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(107.2 |
) |
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(40.0 |
) |
|
|
(63.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for operating activities |
|
|
(21.0 |
) |
|
|
(85.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of assets |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Other |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(16.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to long-term debt |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
Reductions of long-term debt |
|
|
(18.2 |
) |
|
|
(25.8 |
) |
Net additions to revolving credit agreements |
|
|
60.3 |
|
|
|
62.2 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
43.2 |
|
|
|
40.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) for the period |
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
(59.4 |
) |
Balance at the beginning of the period |
|
|
138.3 |
|
|
|
281.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the end of the period |
|
$ |
155.8 |
|
|
$ |
221.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
NACCO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
|
|
MARCH 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock |
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Common Stock |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in Excess of Par Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Shares issued under stock compensation plans |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
399.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
854.9 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change for SFAS No. 158,
net of $0.5 tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
|
399.3 |
|
|
|
853.8 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
5.6 |
|
Cash dividends on Class A and Class B common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 $0.5150 per share |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
2008 $0.5000 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385.9 |
|
|
|
855.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
|
(65.3 |
) |
|
|
14.1 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
|
|
11.3 |
|
Reclassification of hedging activity into earnings |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Current period cash flow hedging activity |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
Cumulative effect of accounting change for SFAS No. 158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Reclassification of pension and post-retirement
activities into earnings |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68.1 |
) |
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
340.7 |
|
|
|
899.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling Interest |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
$ |
340.9 |
|
|
$ |
899.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
NACCO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2009
(Tabular Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share and Percentage Data)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
NACCO Industries, Inc. (the parent company or NACCO) and its wholly owned subsidiaries
(collectively, NACCO Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries or the Company). Intercompany accounts
and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. Also included is Shanghai Hyster Forklift Ltd.,
a 70% owned joint venture of NMHG Holding Co. (NMHG) in China. The Companys subsidiaries
operate in the following principal industries: lift trucks, small appliance distribution,
specialty retail and mining. The Company manages its subsidiaries primarily by industry; however,
the Company manages its lift truck operations as two reportable segments: wholesale manufacturing
and retail distribution.
NMHG designs, engineers, manufactures, sells, services and leases a comprehensive line of lift
trucks and aftermarket parts marketed globally under the Hyster® and Yale®
brand names. NMHG manages its operations as two reportable segments: wholesale manufacturing
(NMHG Wholesale) and retail distribution (NMHG Retail). NMHG Wholesale includes the
manufacture, sale and leasing of lift trucks and the related sale of service parts, primarily to
independent and wholly owned Hyster® and Yale® retail dealerships. Lift
trucks and component parts are manufactured in the United States, Northern Ireland, The
Netherlands, China, Italy, Japan, Mexico, the Philippines and Brazil. NMHG Retail includes the
sale, leasing and service of Hyster® and Yale® lift trucks and related
service parts by wholly owned retail dealerships. Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. (HBB) is a leading
designer, marketer and distributor of small electric household appliances, as well as commercial
products for restaurants, bars and hotels. The Kitchen Collection, Inc. (KC) is a national
specialty retailer of kitchenware and gourmet foods operating under the Kitchen
Collection® and Le Gourmet Chef® store names in outlet and traditional malls
throughout the United States. The North American Coal Corporation and its affiliated coal
companies (collectively, NACoal) mine and market lignite coal primarily as fuel for power
generation and provide selected value-added mining services for other natural resources companies.
These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a
fair presentation of the financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2009 and the results of
its operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 and the results of its cash flows
and changes in equity for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 have been included. These
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited financial statements at
that date but does not include all of the information or notes required by U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles for complete financial statements.
Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for the remainder of the year ending December 31, 2009. Because the
HBB and KC businesses are seasonal, a majority of revenues and operating profit typically occurs in
the second half of the calendar year when sales of small electric household appliances to retailers
and consumers increase significantly for the fall holiday selling season. For further information,
refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Note 2 Recently Issued Accounting Standards
FSP FAS 132(R)-1: In December 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB
Staff Position (FSP) FAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan
Assets. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 modifies existing requirements to require additional disclosures about
plan assets of an employers defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The disclosure
requirements of FSP FAS 132(R)-1 are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009.
The Company will include the disclosures upon adoption in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1: In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB-28-1 amends
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments, to require an entity to provide disclosures about fair value of financial
instruments for interim reporting periods, as well as in annual financial statements. In addition,
the pronouncement also amends Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 28, Interim
Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim
reporting periods. The FSP is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009.
The Company will include the disclosures upon adoption in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
second quarter of 2009.
6
SFAS No. 141R: In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations. SFAS No.
141R modifies the accounting for business combinations by requiring that acquired assets and
assumed liabilities be recorded at fair value, contingent consideration arrangements be recorded at
fair value on the date of the acquisition and preacquisition contingencies will generally be
accounted for in purchase accounting at fair value. The pronouncement also requires that
transaction costs be expensed as incurred, acquired research and development be capitalized as an
indefinite-lived intangible asset and the requirements of SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, be met at the acquisition date in order to accrue for
a restructuring plan in purchase accounting. SFAS No. 141R is required to be adopted prospectively
effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 141R
did not have a material effect on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
SFAS No. 160: In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51. SFAS No. 160 modifies the
reporting for noncontrolling interests in the balance sheet and minority interest income (loss) in
the income statement. The pronouncement also requires that increases and decreases in the
noncontrolling ownership interest amount be accounted for as equity transactions. SFAS No. 160 is
required to be adopted prospectively, with limited exceptions, effective for fiscal years beginning
on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 160 did not have a material effect on the
Companys financial position or results of operations.
Reclassifications: Certain amounts in the prior periods Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements have been reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation.
Note 3 Restructuring and Related Programs
NMHG Program
During 2008 and 2009, based on the decline in economic conditions, NMHGs management reduced its
number of employees worldwide. As a result, NMHG recognized a charge of approximately $6.3 million
in 2008 and $0.7 million in 2009 related to severance. Severance payments of $2.5 million were
made during the first three months of 2009. Payments related to these reductions in force are
expected to continue through the first half of 2009. NMHG continues to evaluate the appropriate
size of its workforce worldwide to match market demand for lift trucks in response to the decline
in economic conditions.
NMHG 2007 Restructuring Programs
During 2007, NMHGs Board of Directors approved a plan to phase out production of current products
at its facility in Irvine, Scotland by early 2009, change the product mix at its Craigavon,
Northern Ireland facility and increase production at its Berea, Kentucky and Sulligent, Alabama
plants in the United States and at its Ramos Arizpe facility in Mexico. As a result, NMHG
Wholesale recognized a charge of approximately $5.5 million in 2007. Of this amount, $5.2 million
related to severance and $0.3 million related to other costs of the restructuring. During 2008,
NMHG recognized an additional charge of $3.2 million. Of this amount, $2.2 million related to
severance and $1.0 million related to other costs of the restructuring. In addition, $0.4 million
of the amount previously accrued was reversed in 2008, as a result of a reduction in the estimate
of employees eligible to receive severance payments. Payments of $2.4 million were made for
severance during the first three months of 2009. Payments related to this restructuring plan are
expected to be made through the first half of 2009. No further charges related to this plan are
expected.
Following is the detail of the charges related to the NMHG restructuring programs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charges |
|
|
Total charges |
|
|
Charges incurred in |
|
|
|
expected to be |
|
|
incurred through |
|
|
the three months |
|
|
|
incurred |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
ended March 31, 2009 |
|
Cash charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance |
|
$ |
14.0 |
|
|
$ |
13.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
Other |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15.3 |
|
|
$ |
14.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
Following is an analysis of the activity related to the NMHG restructuring liability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance |
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
10.0 |
|
Provision |
|
|
0.7 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
Foreign currency effect |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4 Inventories
Inventories are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARCH 31 |
|
|
DECEMBER 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Manufactured inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished goods and service parts - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NMHG Wholesale |
|
$ |
172.0 |
|
|
$ |
177.9 |
|
Raw materials and work in process - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NMHG Wholesale |
|
|
174.2 |
|
|
|
196.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total manufactured inventories |
|
|
346.2 |
|
|
|
374.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sourced inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HBB |
|
|
72.4 |
|
|
|
70.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NMHG Retail |
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
KC |
|
|
50.8 |
|
|
|
50.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retail inventories |
|
|
74.0 |
|
|
|
75.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories at FIFO |
|
|
492.6 |
|
|
|
519.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal NACoal |
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
Mining supplies NACoal |
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories at weighted average |
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NMHG LIFO reserve |
|
|
(60.4 |
) |
|
|
(63.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
452.5 |
|
|
$ |
480.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost of certain manufactured and retail inventories at NMHG, including service parts, has been
determined using the last-in-first-out (LIFO) method. At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
37% and 38%, respectively, of total inventories were determined using the LIFO method. An actual
valuation of inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of the year based on the
inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations must be based on
managements estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs. Because these estimates
are subject to change and may be different than the actual inventory levels and costs at the end of
the year, interim results are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation. During the
first three months of 2009 and 2008, reductions in LIFO inventories at NMHG resulted in
liquidations of LIFO inventory layers carried at lower costs compared with current year purchases.
The income statement effect of such liquidations on Cost of sales was a benefit of $2.4 million
and $0.8 million during the first three months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
8
Note 5 Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company uses forward foreign currency exchange contracts to partially reduce risks related to
transactions denominated in foreign currencies. These contracts hedge firm commitments and
forecasted transactions relating to cash flows associated with sales and purchases denominated in
currencies other than the subsidiaries functional currencies. Changes in the fair value of
forward foreign currency exchange contracts that are effective as hedges are recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (OCI). Deferred gains or losses are reclassified
from OCI to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations in the same period as the
gains or losses from the underlying transactions are recorded and are generally recognized in cost
of sales. The ineffective portion of derivatives that are classified as hedges is immediately
recognized in earnings and generally recognized in cost of sales.
The Company uses interest rate swap agreements to partially reduce risks related to floating rate
financing agreements that are subject to changes in the market rate of interest. Terms of the
interest rate swap agreements require the Company to receive a variable interest rate and pay a
fixed interest rate. The Companys interest rate swap agreements and its variable rate financings
are predominately based upon the three-month and six-month LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate).
Changes in the fair value of interest rate swap agreements that are effective as hedges are
recorded in OCI. Deferred gains or losses are reclassified from OCI to the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations in the same period as the gains or losses from the underlying
transactions are recorded and are generally recognized in interest expense. The ineffective
portion of derivatives that are classified as hedges is immediately recognized in earnings and
included on the line Other in the Other income (expense) section of the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Interest rate swap agreements and forward foreign currency exchange contracts held by the Company
have been designated as hedges of forecasted cash flows. The Company does not currently hold any
nonderivative instruments designated as hedges or any derivatives designated as fair value hedges
as defined in SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
The Company periodically enters into foreign currency exchange contracts that do not meet the
criteria for hedge accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 133. These derivatives are used to
reduce the Companys exposure to foreign currency risk related to forecasted purchase or sales
transactions or forecasted intercompany cash payments or settlements. Gains and losses on these
derivatives are included on the line Other in the Other income (expense) section of the
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Cash flows from hedging activities are reported in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flows in the same classification as the hedged item, generally as a component of cash flows
from operations.
The Company measures its derivatives at fair value on a recurring basis using significant
observable inputs, which is Level 2 as defined in the SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, fair
value hierarchy. The Company uses a present value technique that incorporates the LIBOR swap
curve, foreign currency spot rates and foreign currency forward rates to value its derivatives,
including its interest rate swap agreements and foreign currency exchange contracts, and also
incorporates the effect of its subsidiary and counterparty credit risk into the valuation. The
fair value of derivative assets was $0.8 million and the fair value of derivative liabilities was
$39.8 million at March 31, 2009.
Foreign Currency Derivatives: NMHG and HBB held forward foreign currency exchange contracts with
total notional amounts of $398.7 million and $12.4 million, respectively, at March 31, 2009,
primarily denominated in euros, British pounds, Japanese yen, Canadian dollars, Swedish kroner,
Mexican pesos and Australian dollars. NMHG and HBB held forward foreign currency exchange
contracts with total notional amounts of $561.1 million and $13.0 million, respectively, at
December 31, 2008, primarily denominated in euros, British pounds, Japanese yen, Canadian dollars,
Swedish kroner, Australian dollars and Mexican pesos. The fair value of these contracts
approximated a net liability of $13.4 million and $10.7 million at March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively.
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts that qualify for hedge accounting are used to hedge
transactions expected to occur within the next twelve months. The mark-to-market effect of forward
foreign currency exchange contracts that are considered effective as hedges in accordance with SFAS
No. 133, as amended, has been included in OCI. Based on market valuations at March 31, 2009, $2.0
million of the amount included in OCI at March 31, 2009 is expected to be reclassified as income
into the Consolidated Statement of Operations over the next twelve months, as the transactions
occur.
9
Interest Rate Derivatives: The following table summarizes the notional amounts, related rates
(including applicable margins) and remaining terms of interest rate swap agreements active at March
31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
Average Fixed Rate |
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
December 31 |
|
March 31 |
|
December 31 |
|
Remaining Term at |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
NMHG |
|
$ |
211.0 |
|
|
$ |
211.0 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
Various, extending to May 2012 |
HBB |
|
$ |
108.0 |
|
|
$ |
108.0 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
Various, extending to May 2012 |
NACoal |
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
|
$ |
25.0 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
March 2010 |
In addition to the interest rate swap agreements reflected in the table, at March 31, 2009, NMHG
holds certain contracts that begin on various dates starting in May 2009 and extend to various
dates through February 2013. These contracts increase the notional amount to $428.5 million at
March 31, 2009, but the amount outstanding at any one time will not exceed the balance of the NMHG
Term Loan. In addition to the interest rate swap agreements reflected in the table, at March 31,
2009, HBB holds certain contracts that begin on various dates starting in June 2009 and extend to
various dates through June 2013. These contracts increase the notional amount to $203.0 million at
March 31, 2009, but the amount outstanding at any one time will not exceed the balance of the HBB
Term Loan. The fair value of all interest rate swap agreements was a net liability of $25.6
million and $26.1 million at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The
mark-to-market effect of interest rate swap agreements that are considered effective as hedges in
accordance with SFAS No. 133, as amended, has been included in OCI. Based on market valuations at
March 31, 2009, $5.0 million is expected to be reclassified as expense into the Consolidated
Statement of Operations over the next twelve months, as cash flow payments are made in accordance
with the interest rate swap agreements.
NMHG: NMHG has interest rate swap agreements that hedge interest payments on the NMHG Term Loan.
The interest rate swap agreements held by NMHG on March 31, 2009 are expected to continue to be
effective as hedges.
HBB: HBB has interest rate swaps that hedge interest payments on the HBB Term Loan. The interest
rate swap agreements held by HBB on March 31, 2009 are expected to continue to be effective as
hedges.
The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative
instruments reflected on a gross basis at March 31, 2009 and December
31, 2008 as recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
Balance sheet |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Balance sheet |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
location |
|
Fair value |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
location |
|
Fair value |
|
|
Fair value |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
Long-term |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
Long-term |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
40.8 |
|
|
$ |
39.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
Long-term |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
39.8 |
|
|
$ |
39.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
The following table summarizes the impact of derivative instruments for the three months ended
March 31 as recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain or |
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
|
Amount of Gain or |
|
|
Income on Derivative |
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective |
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on |
|
|
or (Loss) |
|
|
(Loss) Reclassified from |
|
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
|
Portion and Amount |
|
|
|
Derivative (Effective |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
OCI into Income |
|
|
and Amount |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
Derivatives in SFAS 133 Cash |
|
Portion) |
|
|
OCI into Income |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
|
Effectiveness Testing) |
|
Flow Hedging Relationships |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Effectiveness Testing) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
(8.1 |
) |
|
Interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
(2.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Foreign currency
exchange contracts |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1.5 |
) |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in |
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
Derivatives Not Designated as |
|
Income on |
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
Hedging Instruments under |
|
Derivative |
|
Derivative |
|
SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
Other |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
Cost of sales or Other |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Note 6 Unconsolidated Subsidiaries and Equity Investments
Three of NACoals wholly owned subsidiaries, the project mining subsidiaries, meet the definition
of a variable interest entity pursuant to FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 46. The project mining
subsidiaries were developed between 1974 and 1981 and operate lignite coal mines under long-term
contracts with various utility customers. The contracts with the project mining subsidiaries
utility customers allow each mine to sell lignite coal at a price based on actual cost plus an
agreed pre-tax profit per ton. The taxes resulting from earnings of the project mining
subsidiaries are solely the responsibility of the Company. These entities are capitalized
primarily with debt financing, which the utility customers have arranged and guaranteed. The
obligations of the project mining subsidiaries are without recourse to NACCO and NACoal. Although
NACoal owns 100% of the stock and manages the daily operations of these entities, the Company has
determined that the equity capital provided by NACoal is not sufficient to adequately finance the
ongoing activities of the project mining subsidiaries or absorb any expected losses without
additional support from the utility customers. As a result, NACoal is not the primary beneficiary
and therefore does not consolidate these entities financial position or results of operations.
The pre-tax income from the project mining subsidiaries is reported on the line Earnings of
unconsolidated project mining subsidiaries in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations with related taxes included in the provision for income taxes. The Company has included
the pre-tax earnings of the project mining subsidiaries above operating profit as they are an
integral component of the Companys business and operating results. The investment in the project
mining subsidiaries and related tax assets and liabilities was $18.3 million and $16.6 million at
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, and are included on the line Other Non-Current
Assets in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Companys risk of loss
relating to these entities is limited to its invested capital, which was $3.7 million and $5.0
million at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Summarized financial information for the project mining subsidiaries is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
|
MARCH 31 |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Revenues |
|
$ |
95.1 |
|
|
$ |
80.9 |
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
15.9 |
|
|
$ |
12.7 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
|
$ |
8.6 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
8.2 |
|
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
8.2 |
|
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
NMHG has a 20% ownership interest in NMHG Financial Services, Inc. (NFS), a joint venture with GE
Capital Corporation (GECC), formed primarily for the purpose of providing financial services to
independent Hyster® and Yale® lift truck dealers and National Account
customers in the United States. NMHGs ownership in NFS is accounted for using the equity method
of accounting. NFS is considered a variable interest entity, however, the Company has concluded
that NMHG is not the primary beneficiary and will, therefore, continue to use the equity method to
account for its 20% interest in NFS. NMHG does not consider its variable interest in NFS to be
significant.
NMHG has a 50% ownership interest in Sumitomo NACCO Materials Handling Company, Ltd. (SN), a
limited liability company which was formed primarily for the manufacture and distribution of
Sumitomo-Yale and Shinko- branded lift trucks in Japan and the export of Hyster® and
Yale®-branded lift trucks and related components and service parts outside of Japan.
NMHG purchases products from SN under normal trade terms based on current market prices. NMHGs
ownership in SN is also accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
The Companys percentage share of the net income or loss from its equity investments in NFS and SN
are reported on the line Income (loss) from other unconsolidated affiliates in the Other income
(expense) section of the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Companys
equity investments are included on the line Other Non-current Assets in the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets. At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, NMHGs investment in NFS was
$12.8 million and $14.8 million, respectively, and NMHGs investment in SN was $28.5 million and
$29.9 million, respectively.
13
Summarized financial information for these two NMHG equity investments is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
|
MARCH 31 |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Revenues |
|
$ |
71.0 |
|
|
$ |
101.9 |
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
20.6 |
|
|
$ |
29.2 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
Note 7 Guarantees and Contingencies
Various legal and regulatory proceedings and claims have been or may be asserted against NACCO and
certain subsidiaries relating to the conduct of their businesses, including product liability,
environmental and other claims. These proceedings and claims are incidental to the ordinary course
of business of the Company. Management believes that it has meritorious defenses and will
vigorously defend the Company in these actions. Any costs that management estimates will be paid
as a result of these claims are accrued when the liability is considered probable and the amount
can be reasonably estimated. Although the ultimate disposition of these proceedings is not
presently determinable, management believes, after consultation with its legal counsel, that the
likelihood is remote that material costs will be incurred in excess of accruals already recognized.
Under various financing arrangements for certain customers, including independently owned retail
dealerships, NMHG provides guarantees of the residual values of lift trucks or recourse or
repurchase obligations such that NMHG would be obligated in the event of default by the customer.
Terms of the third-party financing arrangements for which NMHG is providing a guarantee generally
range from one to five years. Total guarantees and amounts subject to recourse or repurchase
obligations at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were $166.3 million and $190.1 million,
respectively. Losses anticipated under the terms of the guarantees, recourse or repurchase
obligations are not significant and reserves have been provided for such losses in the accompanying
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. In such circumstances, NMHG retains a
security interest in the related assets financed such that, in the event NMHG would become
obligated under the terms of the recourse or repurchase obligations, NMHG would take title to the
assets financed. The fair value of collateral held at March 31, 2009 was approximately $192.8
million based on Company estimates. The Company estimates the fair value of the collateral using
information regarding the original sales price, the current age of the equipment and general market
conditions that influence the value of both new and used lift trucks. The Company also regularly
monitors the external credit ratings of the entities in which it has provided guarantees. As of
March 31, 2009, the Company does not believe there is a significant risk of non-payment or
non-performance of the obligations by these entities. In addition, NMHG has an agreement with GECC
to limit its exposure to losses at certain eligible dealers. Under this agreement, losses related
to $50.3 million of guarantees for these certain eligible dealers are limited to 7.5% of their
original loan balance, or $16.7 million as of March 31, 2009. The $50.3 million is included in the
$166.3 million of total guarantees and amounts subject to standby recourse or repurchase
obligations at March 31, 2009.
Generally, NMHG sells lift trucks through its independent dealer network or directly to customers.
These dealers and customers may enter into a financing transaction with NFS or other unrelated
third parties. NFS provides debt financing to dealers and lease financing to both dealers and
customers. On occasion, the credit quality of a customer or concentration issues within GECC may
necessitate providing standby recourse or repurchase obligations or a guarantee of the residual
value of the lift trucks purchased by customers and financed through NFS. At March 31, 2009,
approximately $132.0 million of the Companys total guarantees, recourse or repurchase obligations
related to transactions with NFS. In addition, in connection with the joint venture agreement,
NMHG also provides a guarantee to GECC for 20% of NFS debt with GECC, such that NMHG would become
liable under the terms of NFS debt agreements with GECC in the case of default by NFS. At March
31, 2009, the amount of NFS debt guaranteed by NMHG was $182.7 million. NFS has not defaulted
under the terms of this debt financing in the past and although there can be no assurances, NMHG is
not aware of any circumstances that would cause NFS to default in future periods, but is monitoring
the effect of the current economic environment on NFS and GECC.
NMHG provides a standard warranty on its lift trucks, generally for six to twelve months or 1,000
to 2,000 hours. For certain series of lift trucks, NMHG provides an extended powertrain warranty
of two years as part of the standard warranty. HBB provides a standard warranty to consumers for
all of its products. The specific terms and conditions of those warranties vary depending upon the
product brand. In general, if a product is returned under warranty, a refund is provided to the
consumer by HBBs customer, the retailer. Generally, the retailer returns those products to HBB
for a credit. The Company estimates the costs which may be incurred under its standard warranty
programs and records a liability for such costs at the time product revenue is recognized.
In addition, NMHG sells extended warranty agreements, which provide a warranty for an additional
two to five years or up to 2,400 to 10,000 hours. The specific terms and conditions of those
warranties vary depending upon the product sold and the country in which NMHG does business.
Revenue received for the sale of extended warranty contracts is deferred and recognized in the same
manner as the costs incurred to perform under the
14
warranty contracts, in accordance with FASB Technical Bulletin 90-1, Accounting for Separately
Priced Extended Warranty and Product Maintenance Contracts.
NMHG also maintains a quality enhancement program under which it provides for specifically
identified field product improvements in its warranty obligation. Accruals under this program are
determined based on estimates of the potential number of claims to be processed and the cost of
processing those claims based on historical costs.
The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liabilities at NMHG and HBB
and adjusts the amounts as necessary. Factors that affect the Companys warranty liability include
the number of units sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims and the cost per
claim.
Changes in the Companys current and long-term warranty obligations, including deferred revenue on
extended warranty contracts, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
59.9 |
|
Warranties issued |
|
|
7.3 |
|
Settlements made |
|
|
(15.3 |
) |
Foreign currency effect |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31 |
|
$ |
51.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8 Income Taxes
The income tax provision includes U.S. federal, state and local, and foreign income taxes and is
based on the application of a forecasted annual income tax rate applied to the current quarters
year-to-date pre-tax income or loss. In determining the estimated annual effective income tax
rate, the Company analyzes various factors, including projections of the Companys annual earnings,
taxing jurisdictions in which the earnings will be generated, the impact of state and local income
taxes, the Companys ability to use tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards, and available
tax planning alternatives. Discrete items, including the effect of changes in tax laws, tax rates,
and certain circumstances with respect to valuation allowances or other unusual or non-recurring
tax adjustments are reflected in the period in which they occur as an addition to, or reduction
from, the income tax provision, rather than included in the estimated effective annual income tax
rate. Additionally, FIN No. 18, Accounting for Income Taxes in Interim Periods, requires that
the Companys interim effective income tax rate be computed and applied without regard to pre-tax
losses where such losses are not expected to generate a current-year tax benefit.
A reconciliation of the Companys consolidated federal statutory and effective income tax is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
|
|
MARCH 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes: |
|
$ |
(8.7 |
) |
|
$ |
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory taxes (benefit) at 35% |
|
$ |
(3.0 |
) |
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIN No. 18 interim adjustment |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other permanent items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NACoal percentage depletion |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Foreign tax rate differential |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate |
|
|
(4.6 |
%) |
|
|
30.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effective income tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was negative since the
Company recorded an income tax provision on a loss before income taxes, primarily due to the
interim accounting adjustment required by the calculation of the effective income tax rate in
accordance with FIN No. 18.
15
Note 9 Retirement Benefit Plans
The Company maintains various defined benefit pension plans that provide benefits based on years of
service and average compensation during certain periods. The Companys policy is to make
contributions to fund these plans within the range allowed by applicable regulations. Plan assets
consist primarily of publicly traded stocks and government and corporate bonds.
Effective January 1, 2009, pension benefits for HBB employees in Canada were frozen. Pension
benefits for certain NACoal employees, excluding certain project mining subsidiary employees, were
frozen in 2004. In 1996, pension benefits were frozen for employees covered under NMHGs and HBBs
U.S. plans, except for those NMHG employees participating in collective bargaining agreements. As
a result, in the United States only certain NMHG employees covered under collective bargaining
agreements will earn retirement benefits under defined benefit pension plans. Other employees of
the Company, including employees whose pension benefits were frozen, will receive retirement
benefits under defined contribution retirement plans.
The Company also maintains health care and life insurance plans which provide benefits to eligible
retired employees. These plans have no assets. Under the Companys current policy, benefits under
these plans are funded at the time they are due to participants or beneficiaries.
The components of pension and post-retirement (income) expense are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
|
|
MARCH 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
U.S. Pension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
Amortization of actuarial loss |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Pension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
Employee contributions |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Amortization of actuarial loss |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-retirement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Amortization of prior service credit |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Note 10 Business Segments
Financial information for each of NACCOs reportable segments, as defined by SFAS No. 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, is presented in the
following table. See Note 1 for a discussion of the Companys operating segments and product
lines. NACCOs non-operating segment, NACCO and Other, includes the accounts of the parent company
and Bellaire Corporation.
NMHG Wholesale derives a portion of its revenues from transactions with NMHG Retail. The amount of
these revenues, which are based on current market prices on similar third-party transactions, are
indicated in the following table on the line NMHG Eliminations in the revenues section. HBB
derives a portion of its revenues from transactions with KC. The amounts of these revenues, which
are based in current market prices on similar third-party transactions, are indicated in the
following table on the line Eliminations in the revenues section. No other sales transactions
occur among reportable segments. Other transactions among reportable segments are recognized based
on similar third-party transactions; that is, at current market prices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
|
|
MARCH 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NMHG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NMHG Wholesale |
|
$ |
371.6 |
|
|
$ |
677.9 |
|
NMHG Retail |
|
|
31.0 |
|
|
|
46.9 |
|
NMHG Eliminations |
|
|
(13.5 |
) |
|
|
(25.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
389.1 |
|
|
|
698.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HBB |
|
|
94.2 |
|
|
|
95.2 |
|
KC |
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
|
NACoal |
|
|
36.5 |
|
|
|
32.3 |
|
NACCO and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
558.6 |
|
|
$ |
865.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NMHG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NMHG Wholesale |
|
$ |
(12.8 |
) |
|
$ |
13.4 |
|
NMHG Retail |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
NMHG Eliminations |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HBB |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
KC |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
NACoal |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
NACCO and Other |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
16.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
|
|
MARCH 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NMHG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NMHG Wholesale |
|
$ |
(19.1 |
) |
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
NMHG Retail |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
NMHG Eliminations |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.5 |
) |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HBB |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
KC |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
NACoal |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
NACCO and Other |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(9.1 |
) |
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Tabular Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share and Percentage Data)
NACCO Industries, Inc. (the parent company or NACCO) and its wholly owned subsidiaries
(collectively, the Company) operate in the following principal industries: lift trucks, small
appliance distribution, specialty retail and mining. Results of operations and financial condition
are discussed separately by segment, which corresponds with the industry groupings. The Company
manages its lift truck operations as two reportable segments: wholesale manufacturing and retail
distribution. Results by segment are also summarized in Note 10 to the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
NMHG Holding Co. (NMHG) designs, engineers, manufactures, sells, services and leases a
comprehensive line of lift trucks and aftermarket parts marketed globally under the
Hyster® and Yale® brand names. NMHG manages its operations as two reportable
segments: wholesale manufacturing (NMHG Wholesale) and retail distribution (NMHG Retail). NMHG
Wholesale includes the manufacture, sale and leasing of lift trucks and the related sale of service
parts, primarily to independent and wholly owned Hyster® and Yale® retail
dealerships. Lift trucks and component parts are manufactured in the United States, Northern
Ireland, The Netherlands, China, Italy, Japan, Mexico, the Philippines and Brazil. NMHG Retail
includes the sale, leasing and service of Hyster® and Yale® lift trucks and
related service parts by wholly owned retail dealerships. Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. (HBB) is a
leading designer, marketer and distributor of small electric household appliances, as well as
commercial products for restaurants, bars and hotels. The Kitchen Collection, Inc. (KC) is a
national specialty retailer of kitchenware and gourmet foods operating under the Kitchen
Collection® and Le Gourmet Chef® store names in outlet and traditional malls
throughout the United States. The North American Coal Corporation and its affiliated coal
companies (collectively NACoal) mine and market lignite coal primarily as fuel for power
generation and provide selected value-added mining services for other natural resources companies
in the United States. Lignite coal is delivered from NACoals mines in Texas, North Dakota,
Louisiana and Mississippi to adjacent or nearby power plants. Dragline mining services are
provided for independently owned limerock quarries in Florida.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Please refer to the discussion of the Companys Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates as
disclosed on pages 36 through 39 in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008. The Companys Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates have not materially
changed from December 31, 2008.
19
NACCO MATERIALS HANDLING GROUP
FINANCIAL REVIEW
NMHG Retail includes the elimination of intercompany revenues and profits resulting from sales by
NMHG Wholesale to NMHG Retail.
The segment and geographic results of operations for NMHG were as follows for the three months
ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
$ |
229.2 |
|
|
$ |
394.1 |
|
Europe |
|
|
100.3 |
|
|
|
222.7 |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
42.1 |
|
|
|
61.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371.6 |
|
|
|
677.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail (net of eliminations) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NMHG Consolidated |
|
$ |
389.1 |
|
|
$ |
698.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
$ |
(1.8 |
) |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
Europe |
|
|
(10.1 |
) |
|
|
11.4 |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.8 |
) |
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail (net of eliminations) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NMHG Consolidated |
|
$ |
(12.6 |
) |
|
$ |
13.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale |
|
$ |
(4.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.5 |
) |
Retail (net of eliminations) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NMHG Consolidated |
|
$ |
(4.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
Retail (net of eliminations) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NMHG Consolidated |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale |
|
$ |
(19.1 |
) |
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
Retail (net of eliminations) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NMHG Consolidated |
|
$ |
(18.5 |
) |
|
$ |
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale |
|
|
(a |
) |
|
|
17.7 |
% |
Retail (net of eliminations) |
|
|
(a |
) |
|
|
14.3 |
% |
NMHG Consolidated |
|
|
(a |
) |
|
|
18.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The effective income tax rate is not meaningful. |
See further discussion of the consolidated effective income tax rate in Note 8 of the Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
20
First Quarter of 2009 Compared with First Quarter of 2008
NMHG Wholesale
The following table identifies the components of change in revenues for the first quarter of 2009
compared with the first quarter of 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
677.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in 2009 from: |
|
|
|
|
Unit volume |
|
|
(282.3 |
) |
Foreign currency |
|
|
(30.2 |
) |
Parts |
|
|
(22.1 |
) |
Fleet services |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
Unit product mix and other |
|
|
18.6 |
|
Unit price |
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
371.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues decreased 45.2% to $371.6 million in the first quarter of 2009, primarily as a result of a
decrease in unit and parts volume in all geographic regions due to the economic downturn in each of
these markets. Worldwide unit shipments decreased in the first quarter of 2009 to 10,711 from
shipments of 22,341 in the first quarter of 2008. Unfavorable foreign currency movements as the
U.S. dollar strengthened against the euro, British pound and Australian dollar also contributed to
the decrease in revenue during the first quarter of 2009. A favorable shift in sales mix to
higher-priced lift trucks in the Americas, Europe and Asia-Pacific and the effect of unit and parts
price increases implemented in prior years in the Americas and Europe slightly offset the decrease
in revenues.
The following table identifies the components of change in operating profit (loss) for the first
quarter of 2009 compared with the first quarter of 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
Profit (Loss) |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
13.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in 2009 from: |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
(42.3 |
) |
Foreign currency |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Other selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
(12.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
NMHG Wholesale recognized an operating loss of $12.8 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared
with operating profit of $13.4 million in the first quarter of 2008. The decrease was primarily
due to a decrease in gross profit partially offset by a decrease in selling, general and
administrative expenses. The decrease in gross profit was mainly attributable to the decline in
unit and parts volume, a shift in sales to lower-margin units and an increase in manufacturing
costs as less fixed costs were absorbed due to lower production volumes. The negative impact to
gross margin was partially offset by reduced warranty costs, resulting from better claims
experience and lower sales volumes, and benefits totaling $12.2 million from price increases
implemented in prior periods. The benefits of these price increases were partially offset by
material cost increases of $3.0 million. The decrease in selling, general and administrative
expenses was primarily due to cost containment actions, including reductions in employee-related
expenses, implemented in late 2008 and early 2009.
NMHG Wholesale recognized a net loss of $19.1 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared with
net income of $7.9 million in the first quarter of 2008, primarily as a result of the decrease in
operating profit (loss) and higher income tax expense as a result of an interim tax accounting
adjustment from a shift in the mix of pre-tax losses to jurisdictions where NMHG does not currently
recognize a tax benefit for the losses.
21
Backlog
NMHG Wholesales worldwide backlog level decreased to approximately 12,800 units at March 31, 2009
compared with approximately 29,100 units at March 31, 2008 and approximately 14,900 units at
December 31, 2008.
NMHG Retail (net of eliminations)
The following table identifies the components of change in revenues for the first quarter of 2009
compared with the first quarter of 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
21.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in 2009 from: |
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency |
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
Europe |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
Eliminations |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues decreased 16.7% to $17.5 million for the first quarter of 2009 compared with $21.0 million
for the first quarter of 2008. The decrease was primarily the result of unfavorable foreign
currency movements due to the weakening of the Australian dollar and lower unit and parts volume
and rental revenues in Europe and Asia-Pacific. The decrease was partially offset by a reduction
in the required intercompany revenue elimination compared with the first quarter of 2008 due to a
decline in intercompany sales transactions.
The following table identifies the components of change in operating profit (loss) for the first
quarter of 2009 compared with the first quarter of 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
Profit (Loss) |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in 2009 from: |
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
0.7 |
|
Foreign currency |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Europe |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
NMHG Retail recognized operating profit of $0.2 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared with
an operating loss of $0.2 million in the first quarter of 2008. The increase was primarily due to
the favorable effect of the reduction in the required intercompany eliminations and reduced
spending in Europe and Asia-Pacific, partially offset by lower volume, unit and rental margins in
Europe and lower unit, service and rental margins in Asia-Pacific.
NMHG Retail recognized net income of $0.6 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared with net
loss of $0.6 million in the first quarter of 2008. The change was primarily due to a higher income
tax benefit in the first three months of 2009 and the factors affecting operating profit (loss).
22
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows
The following tables detail the changes in cash flow for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(18.5 |
) |
|
$ |
7.3 |
|
|
$ |
(25.8 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
Other |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Working capital changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
96.2 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
96.7 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
(48.8 |
) |
|
|
70.3 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
(122.8 |
) |
|
|
(31.5 |
) |
|
|
(91.3 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for operating activities |
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
|
|
(62.6 |
) |
|
|
53.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
|
|
9.2 |
|
Proceeds from the sale of assets |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow before financing activities |
|
$ |
(4.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(73.0 |
) |
|
$ |
68.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for operating activities decreased $53.7 million primarily as a result of the change
in working capital, partially offset by the decrease in net income (loss). The change in working
capital was mainly due to a reduction in accounts receivable as a result of the decline in revenues
and a decline in inventory due to a reduction in production volume as a result of lower demand.
These changes were partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable and other liabilities as a
result of a decline in inventory due to reduced demand.
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities increased primarily due to lower capital
expenditures as a result of cost containment actions implemented in late 2008 and early 2009 and
the funding of a portion of NMHGs capital expenditures by NACCO during the first quarter of 2009.
In addition, NMHG had an increase in proceeds from the sale of assets primarily due to the sale of
the manufacturing facility in Irvine, Scotland and the intercompany sale of an airplane to NACCO
during the first three months of 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net additions of long-term debt and
revolving credit agreements |
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
|
$ |
43.9 |
|
|
$ |
(33.0 |
) |
Capital contribution from NACCO |
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
Intercompany loans |
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
$ |
20.9 |
|
|
$ |
43.9 |
|
|
$ |
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in net cash provided by financing activities in the first three months of 2009 compared
with the first three months of 2008 was primarily due to reduced borrowings and the repayment of
intercompany loans, partially offset by a $25.0 million capital contribution from NACCO.
23
Financing Activities
NMHGs primary financing is provided by a $175.0 million secured floating-rate revolving credit
facility (the NMHG Facility) and a term loan facility (the NMHG Term Loan). The obligations
under the NMHG Facility are secured by a first lien on the cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable and inventory of NMHG. The approximate value of NMHGs assets held as collateral under
the NMHG Facility was $275 million as of March 31, 2009.
The maximum availability under the NMHG Facility is governed by a borrowing base derived from
advance rates against the inventory and accounts receivable of the borrowers, as defined in the
NMHG Facility. Adjustments to reserves booked against these assets, including inventory reserves,
will change the eligible borrowing base and thereby impact the liquidity provided by the NMHG
Facility. A portion of the availability can be denominated in British pounds or euros. Borrowings
bear interest at a floating rate, which can be a base rate or LIBOR, as defined in the NMHG
Facility, plus an applicable margin. The current applicable margins, effective March 31, 2009, for
domestic base rate loans and LIBOR loans were 0.75% and 1.75%, respectively. The applicable
margin, effective March 31, 2009, for fixed foreign LIBOR loans was 1.75% and for foreign overdraft
loans was 2.00%. The NMHG Facility also requires the payment of a fee of 0.375% per annum on the
unused commitment. The margins and unused commitment fee are subject to quarterly adjustment based
on a leverage ratio.
At March 31, 2009, the borrowing base under the NMHG Facility was $126.5 million, which reflects
reductions for the commitments or availability under certain foreign credit facilities, reduced
collateral values of $7.9 million and for an excess availability requirement of $10.0 million.
There were no borrowings outstanding under this facility at March 31, 2009. The domestic and
foreign floating rates of interest applicable to the NMHG Facility on March 31, 2009 were 4.00% and
3.25%, respectively, including the applicable floating rate margin. The NMHG Facility expires in
December 2010.
The terms of the NMHG Facility provide that availability is reduced by the commitments or
availability under foreign credit facilities of the borrowers and certain foreign working capital
facilities. A foreign credit facility commitment of approximately $16.1 million in Australia
reduced the amount of availability under the NMHG Facility at March 31, 2009. In addition,
availability under the NMHG Facility was reduced by $9.2 million in Europe for a reserve for
preferential claims related to supplier-based inventory and by $5.3 million for other letters of
credit. If the commitments or availability under these facilities are increased, availability
under the NMHG Facility will be reduced. The $126.5 million of borrowing base capacity under the
NMHG Facility at March 31, 2009 reflected reductions for these foreign credit facilities.
During 2006, NACCO Materials Handling Group, Inc. (NMHG Inc.), a wholly owned subsidiary of NMHG,
entered into the NMHG Term Loan that provided for term loans up to an aggregate principal amount of
$225.0 million, which mature in 2013. The term loans require quarterly payments in an amount equal
to 1% of the original principal per year for the first six years, with the remaining balance to be
paid in four equal installments in the seventh year. At March 31, 2009, there was $218.8 million
outstanding under the NMHG Term Loan.
Borrowings under the NMHG Term Loan are guaranteed by NMHG and substantially all of NMHGs domestic
subsidiaries. The obligations of the guarantors under the NMHG Term Loan are secured by a first
lien on all of the domestic machinery, equipment and real property owned by NMHG Inc. and each
guarantor and a second lien on all of the collateral securing the obligations of NMHG under its
revolving credit facility. The approximate value of NMHGs assets held as collateral under the
NMHG Term Loan was $400 million as of March 31, 2009, which includes the value of the collateral
securing the NMHG Facility.
Outstanding borrowings under the NMHG Term Loan bear interest at a variable rate that, at NMHG
Inc.s option, will be either LIBOR or a floating rate, as defined in the NMHG Term Loan, plus an
applicable margin. The applicable margin is subject to adjustment based on a leverage ratio. The
weighted average interest rate on the amount outstanding under the NMHG Term Loan at March 31, 2009
was 3.65%.
In addition to the amount outstanding under the NMHG Term Loan and the NMHG Facility, NMHG had
borrowings of approximately $43.9 million at March 31, 2009 under various working capital
facilities.
Both the NMHG Facility and NMHG Term Loan include restrictive covenants, which, among other things,
limit the payment of dividends to NACCO. Subject to achieving availability thresholds, dividends
to NACCO are limited to the larger of $5.0 million or 50% of the preceding years net income for
NMHG. The NMHG Facility and the NMHG Term Loan also require NMHG to meet certain financial tests,
including, but not limited to, minimum excess availability, maximum capital expenditures, maximum
leverage ratio and minimum fixed charge coverage ratio tests. At March 31, 2009, NMHG was in
compliance with the covenants in the NMHG Facility and the NMHG Term Loan.
In light of the current economic and market conditions, the Company and NMHG are continually
monitoring NMHGs covenant compliance. NMHG has implemented certain actions and future actions are
being evaluated in connection with covenant compliance. However, given the current economic
environment or a worsening of this environment, there is no assurance that such actions will be
sufficient, or in the event NMHG is required to refinance the NMHG Facility, if such refinancing
could be obtained on acceptable terms or at all.
24
NMHG believes funds available from cash on hand at NMHG and the Company, the NMHG Facility, other
available lines of credit and operating cash flows will provide sufficient liquidity to meet its
operating needs and commitments arising during the next twelve months and until the expiration of
the NMHG Facility in December 2010.
Contractual Obligations, Contingent Liabilities and Commitments
Since December 31, 2008, there have been no significant changes in the total amount of NMHGs
contractual obligations or commercial commitments, or the timing of cash flows in accordance with
those obligations, as reported on page 52 in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008.
Capital Expenditures
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment were $1.6 million for NMHG Wholesale and $0.1
million for NMHG Retail during the first three months of 2009. Capital expenditures are estimated
to be an additional $10.7 million for NMHG Wholesale and $0.6 million for NMHG Retail for the
remainder of 2009. Planned expenditures for the remainder of 2009 include tooling for new products, product cost reduction
programs and rental fleet additions.
The principal sources of financing for these capital expenditures will be internally generated
funds and bank borrowings.
Capital Structure
NMHGs capital structure is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Total net tangible assets |
|
$ |
450.3 |
|
|
$ |
445.4 |
|
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
Advances from NACCO |
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
|
|
(35.0 |
) |
|
|
15.0 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
(267.5 |
) |
|
|
(256.0 |
) |
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
$ |
162.8 |
|
|
$ |
154.4 |
|
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt to total capitalization |
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
%) |
The $4.9 million increase in total net tangible assets was primarily attributable to a $98.5
million decrease in accounts payable primarily due to a reduction in inventory from lower demand.
In addition, the increase was due to a $37.2 million decrease in other current liabilities
primarily as a result of cost containment actions, including reductions in employee-related
accruals implemented in late 2008 and early 2009, and the payment of amounts accrued at December
31, 2008 during the first quarter of 2009. The increase was offset by a $99.8 million reduction in
accounts receivable primarily from the decline in revenues and a $27.0 million decrease in
inventory primarily due to a reduction in production levels as a result of lower demand.
Total debt decreased due to the repayment of Advances from NACCO partially offset by higher
borrowings of Other debt during the first three months of 2009. Stockholders equity increased
$8.4 million in the first three months of 2009 as a result of $28.9 million of cash and non-cash
capital contributions from NACCO, partially offset by an $18.5 million net loss and a $2.0 million
decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), primarily due to a decrease in the
cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment.
OUTLOOK
NMHG Wholesale
NMHG Wholesale expects significant declines in all lift truck markets in 2009 compared with 2008,
with limited recovery until 2010, despite global market levels which
appear to have stabilized at a very low level in recent months. As a result, NMHG Wholesale expects significantly lower unit
booking and shipment levels and a reduction in parts sales in 2009 compared with 2008.
NMHG took a number of steps in late 2008 and the first quarter of 2009 to respond to the market
outlook, which include capital expenditure restraints, planned plant downtime, reductions-in-force,
restrictions on spending and travel, suspension of incentive compensation and profit-sharing, wage
freezes and salary and benefit reductions, all of which are expected to continue to reduce expenses
in 2009 compared with 2008.
NMHG Wholesale is also actively monitoring commodity costs and other supply chain drivers to ensure
timely implementation of reductions in procurement costs because material costs, specifically
steel, and fuel and freight costs, have moderated.
25
NMHG Wholesale completed its manufacturing restructuring program in the first quarter of 2009.
This program is anticipated to improve results over the remainder of 2009, and to generate benefits
of approximately $15 million in annual cost savings when production returns to more normal volume
levels.
NMHG Wholesales warehouse truck and big truck product development programs, and its important new
electric-rider lift truck program, are progressing as planned. The new electric-rider lift truck
program is expected to bring a full line of newly designed products to market, including the
introduction of two series in the second quarter of 2009 and two series in the second half of 2009.
NMHG
Wholesale expects a significant loss in the second quarter. However,
modest unit and parts volume
improvements, benefits from new product
introductions, improved material costs and product cost reductions,
as well as further general expense reductions, are expected in the second half
of the year, resulting in earnings beginning to improve, especially in the
fourth quarter. Nevertheless, NMHG is expected to operate at a loss for the 2009 full year. Cash
flow before financing activities is expected to improve significantly in 2009 compared with 2008
primarily as a result of a reduction in working capital and lower capital expenditures.
NMHG Retail
NMHG Retails key improvement programs are expected to continue to have a favorable effect on 2009
results and cash flow before financing activities and to assist NMHG Retail in meeting its
strategic objective of achieving at least break-even results while building market position.
However, as economic conditions in the United Kingdom and Australia continue to deteriorate, sales
of units, parts and service are expected to decline further, which could adversely affect revenues
and profit margins.
HAMILTON BEACH BRANDS, INC.
HBBs business is seasonal, and the majority of revenues and operating profit occurs in the second
half of the year when sales of small electric appliances to retailers and consumers increase
significantly for the fall holiday selling season.
FINANCIAL REVIEW
The results of operations for HBB were as follows for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Revenues |
|
$ |
94.2 |
|
|
$ |
95.2 |
|
Operating profit |
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(2.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.9 |
) |
Other income (expense) |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate |
|
|
41.7 |
% |
|
|
(a |
) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The effective income tax rate is not meaningful. |
First Quarter of 2009 Compared with First Quarter of 2008
The following table identifies the components of change in revenues for the first quarter of 2009
compared with the first quarter of 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
95.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in 2009 from: |
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
Unit volume and mix |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Average sales price |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
94.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues decreased slightly to $94.2 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared with $95.2
million in the first quarter of 2008 primarily due to unfavorable foreign currency movements from a
weakening Canadian dollar and Mexican peso. In addition, the decrease was due to a decline in unit
volume as a result of reduced consumer spending from the weak global economy. The decrease in
revenues was partially offset by higher average sales
26
prices and a shift in mix to sales of higher-priced products in the first quarter of 2009 compared
with the first quarter of 2008.
The following table identifies the components of change in operating profit for the first quarter
of 2009 compared with the first quarter of 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
Profit |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in 2009 from: |
|
|
|
|
Other selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
4.8 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
Foreign currency |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
HBBs operating profit increased to $4.4 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared with $2.7
million in the first quarter of 2008. Operating results increased primarily as a result of lower
selling, general and administrative expenses primarily due to cost containment actions, including
the suspension and reduction of several employee-related benefits, taken in late 2008 and early
2009 and lower advertising expenses in the first quarter of 2009 compared with the first quarter of
2008. The increase in operating profit was partially offset by a reduction in gross profit
primarily caused by higher commodity costs, partially offset by the favorable effect of price
increases and the sale of higher-margin products.
HBB recognized net income of $1.4 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared with $0.1 million
in the first quarter of 2008. The increase in net income was primarily due to the increase in
operating results and reduced interest expense in the first quarter of 2009 compared with the first
quarter of 2008.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows
The following tables detail the changes in cash flow for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
Working capital changes |
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow before financing activities |
|
$ |
11.5 |
|
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $7.4 million primarily due to working capital
changes partially offset by the decrease in other operating activities in the first three months of
2009. The change in working capital was primarily the result of a reduction in intercompany tax
receivables due to a change in the timing of payments and a smaller increase in inventory due to
lower levels of anticipated sales. The change was partially offset by a smaller decrease in
accounts receivable in the first three months of 2009 compared with the first three months of 2008
as a result of lower revenues in the fourth quarter of 2008 compared with the fourth quarter of
2007 and improved collections. The change in other operating activities was primarily due to a
change in deferred taxes.
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reductions to long-term debt
and revolving credit agreements |
|
$ |
(2.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.7 |
) |
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
Capital contribution from NACCO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing activities |
|
$ |
(2.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.6 |
) |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing activities decreased $1.3 million in the first three months of 2009
compared with the first three months of 2008, primarily due to lower payments made on borrowings
during the first three months of 2009 compared with the first three months of 2008 partially offset
by the absence of capital contributions from NACCO during the first three months of 2009.
Financing Activities
HBB has a $115.0 million senior secured floating-rate revolving credit facility (the HBB
Facility) that expires July 31, 2012. The obligations under the HBB Facility are secured by a
first lien on the accounts receivable and inventory of HBB and a second lien on all of the other
assets of HBB. The approximate value of HBBs assets held as collateral for the first and second
lien under the HBB Facility was $270 million as of March 31, 2009.
The HBB Facility is governed by a borrowing base derived from advance rates against the inventory
and accounts receivable, as defined in the HBB Facility. Adjustments to reserves, including
derivative reserves, will change the eligible borrowing base. A portion of the availability can be
denominated in Canadian dollars to provide funding to HBBs Canadian subsidiary. Borrowings bear
interest at a floating rate, which can be either a base rate, LIBOR or bankers acceptance rate, as
defined in the HBB Facility, plus an applicable margin. The applicable margins, effective March
31, 2009, for base rate loans and LIBOR loans denominated in U.S. dollars were 0.00% and 1.00%,
respectively. The applicable margins, effective March 31, 2009, for base rate and bankers
acceptance loans denominated in Canadian dollars were 0.50% and 1.00%, respectively. The HBB
Facility also requires a fee of 0.20% per annum on the unused commitment. The margins and unused
commitment fee are subject to quarterly adjustment based on average excess availability.
At March 31, 2009, the borrowing base under the HBB Facility was $64.6 million. There were no
borrowings outstanding under the HBB Facility at March 31, 2009. The floating rate of interest
applicable to the HBB Facility at March 31, 2009 was 2.27% including the floating rate margin.
The HBB Facility includes restrictive covenants that, among other things, set limitations on
additional indebtedness (other than indebtedness under the HBB Facility and HBB Term Loan (as
defined below)), investments, asset sales and the payment of dividends to NACCO. Subject to
achieving availability thresholds, dividends to NACCO are limited to $5.0 million plus 50% of HBBs
net income since the effective date of the amendment in 2007. The HBB Facility also requires HBB to
meet minimum fixed charge ratio tests in certain circumstances. At March 31, 2009, HBB was in
compliance with the covenants in the HBB Facility.
During 2007, HBB entered into a term loan agreement (the HBB Term Loan) that provided for term
loans up to an aggregate principal amount of $125.0 million. Borrowings outstanding under the HBB
Term Loan were $117.0 million at March 31, 2009. The term loans require quarterly principal
payments in an amount equal to 1% of the original principal amount per year for the term of the
loan, with the remaining balance to be paid at the maturity date on May 31, 2013. Prior to the
final maturity date, the term loans are subject to mandatory prepayments from the proceeds of the
issuance of certain indebtedness, certain asset sales and 50% of excess cash flow, as defined in
the HBB Term Loan. The obligations of HBB under the HBB Term Loan are secured by a second lien on
accounts receivable and inventory and a first lien on all of the other assets of HBB. The
approximate value of HBBs assets held as collateral for the first and second lien under the HBB
Term Loan was $270 million as of March 31, 2009.
The term loans bear interest at a floating rate that, at HBBs option, can be either a base rate or
LIBOR, as defined in the HBB Term Loan, plus an applicable margin. The applicable margins,
effective March 31, 2009, for base rate loans and LIBOR loans were 1.25% and 2.25%, respectively.
The applicable margins are subject to quarterly adjustment based on a leverage ratio. The weighted
average interest rate on the amount outstanding under the HBB Term Loan was 3.52% at March 31,
2009.
The HBB Term Loan contains restrictive covenants substantially similar to those in the HBB Facility
that, among other things, limit the amount of dividends HBB may declare and pay and the incurrence
of indebtedness (other than indebtedness under the HBB Facility). Dividends to NACCO are limited
to $5.0 million plus 50% of HBBs net income since the closing date of the HBB Term Loan in 2007.
The HBB Term Loan also requires HBB to meet certain financial tests, including, but not limited to,
maximum total leverage ratio and minimum fixed charge coverage ratio tests. At March 31, 2009, HBB
was in compliance with the covenants in the HBB Term Loan.
28
In light of the current economic and market conditions, the Company and HBB are continually
monitoring HBBs covenant compliance. HBB has implemented certain actions and future actions are
being evaluated in connection with covenant compliance. However, given the current economic
environment or a worsening of this environment, there is no assurance that such actions will be
sufficient or in the event HBB is required to refinance the HBB Facility, if such refinancing could
be obtained on acceptable terms or at all.
HBB believes funds available from cash on hand at HBB and the Company, the HBB Facility and
operating cash flows will provide sufficient liquidity to meet its operating needs and commitments
arising during the next twelve months and until the HBB Facility expires in July 2012.
Contractual Obligations, Contingent Liabilities and Commitments
Since December 31, 2008, there have been no significant changes in the total amount of HBBs
contractual obligations, contingent liabilities or commercial commitments, or the timing of cash
flows in accordance with those obligations as reported on page 61 in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Capital Expenditures
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment were $0.7 million for the first three months of 2009
and are estimated to be an additional $3.1 million for the remainder of 2009. These planned
capital expenditures are primarily for tooling for new products. These expenditures are expected
to be funded from internally generated funds and bank borrowings.
Capital Structure
Working capital is significantly affected by the seasonality of HBBs business. The following is a
discussion of the changes in HBBs capital structure at March 31, 2009 compared with both March 31,
2008 and December 31, 2008.
March 31, 2009 Compared with March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Total net tangible assets |
|
$ |
79.7 |
|
|
$ |
87.6 |
|
|
$ |
(7.9 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
80.7 |
|
|
|
(80.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets |
|
|
79.7 |
|
|
|
168.3 |
|
|
|
(88.6 |
) |
Total debt |
|
|
(117.3 |
) |
|
|
(148.6 |
) |
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
$ |
(37.6 |
) |
|
$ |
19.7 |
|
|
$ |
(57.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt to total capitalization |
|
|
(a |
) |
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
(a |
) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Debt to total capitalization is not meaningful. |
Total net tangible assets decreased $7.9 million at March 31, 2009 compared with March 31, 2008,
primarily due to a $17.1 million decrease in inventory primarily due to lower levels of anticipated
sales, an $8.6 million decrease in accounts receivable as a result of improved collections and a
$7.3 million decrease in other current assets primarily due to the collection of refundable foreign
taxes. The decrease was partially offset by a $15.3 million increase in cash and an $11.4 million
decrease in accounts payable primarily due to the lower levels of inventory.
During 2008, HBB wrote off all of its goodwill and recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $80.7
million as a result of the significant decline in the Companys stock price and uncertain market
conditions.
Total debt decreased as a result of repayments made since March 31, 2008. Stockholders equity
decreased primarily due to HBBs net loss of $72.0 million for the twelve month period ending March
31, 2009 and an $11.3 million decrease in accumulated other comprehensive loss, primarily due to an
increase in the pension liability and the change in the cumulative foreign currency translation
adjustment, partially offset by $26.0 million of capital contributions from NACCO during the last
nine months of 2008.
29
March 31, 2009 Compared with December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Total net tangible assets |
|
$ |
79.7 |
|
|
$ |
81.4 |
|
|
$ |
(1.7 |
) |
Total debt |
|
|
(117.3 |
) |
|
|
(119.6 |
) |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
$ |
(37.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(38.2 |
) |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt to total capitalization |
|
|
(a |
) |
|
|
(a |
) |
|
|
(a |
) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Debt to total capitalization is not meaningful. |
The HBB capital structure at March 31, 2009 is comparable to the capital structure at December 31,
2008.
OUTLOOK
The global recession and other consumer financial concerns are among factors creating an extremely
challenging retail environment. As a result, HBBs revenues in 2009 are expected to be lower than
in 2008.
As a result of anticipated lower volumes, HBB took aggressive cost containment actions in early
2009, including personnel reductions, spending and travel restrictions, suspension of incentive
compensation, benefit reductions and wage freezes. These actions, along with initiatives to
improve pricing and product positioning and to reduce product and transportation costs in light of
softening commodity costs for resins, copper, steel, aluminum and fuel, are expected to help HBB
return to improved operating margins for the remainder of the year in comparison with 2008, and to
result in a significant improvement in full year operating profit.
Despite the economic environment, HBB is placing continued focus on strengthening its market
position through product innovation, promotions and branding programs, together with appropriate
advertising. New products were introduced in 2008, and additional new product introductions are in
the pipeline for 2009. As a result of these new products, HBB anticipates continued strong
placements in 2009, with increased placements and distribution at some retailers.
Overall, 2009 net income and cash flow before financing activities are currently expected to
improve significantly compared with weak 2008 results before the goodwill impairment charge of
$80.7 million because of the previously discussed actions. However, if HBBs markets, which
currently appear to have stabilized, deteriorate, revenues and earnings could be adversely
affected.
30
THE KITCHEN COLLECTION, INC.
KCs business is seasonal and the majority of revenues and operating profit occurs in the second
half of the year when sales of small electric appliances to consumers increase significantly for
the fall holiday selling season.
FINANCIAL REVIEW
The results of operations for KC were as follows for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
39.7 |
|
|
$ |
39.2 |
|
Operating loss
|
|
$ |
(4.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.5 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
Other income (expense)
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(2.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
34.9 |
% |
|
|
44.8 |
% |
First Quarter of 2009 Compared with First Quarter of 2008
The following table identifies the components of change in revenues for the first quarter of 2009
compared with the first quarter of 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
39.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in 2009 from: |
|
|
|
|
New store sales |
|
|
2.5 |
|
KC comparable store sales |
|
|
0.4 |
|
LGC comparable store sales |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
Closed stores |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
39.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues increased 1.3% in the first quarter of 2009 to $39.7 million compared with $39.2 million
in the first quarter of 2008, primarily as a result of the impact of opening new stores at LGC and
KC and an increase in comparable store sales at KC mainly due to higher sales transactions and more
customer visits. The increase in revenues was partially offset by a decrease in comparable store
sales at LGC as a result of fewer sales transactions and customer visits and the effect of closing
unprofitable stores. The net effect of opening new stores and closing unprofitable stores caused
the number of KC stores to increase to 202 stores as of March 31, 2009 from 197 stores at March 31,
2008, while LGC operated 80 stores at March 31, 2009 and 72 stores at March 31, 2008. KC and LGC
operated 202 and 83 stores at December 31, 2008, respectively.
31
The following table identifies the components of change in operating loss for the first quarter of
2009 compared with the first quarter of 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
Loss |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in 2009 from: |
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
0.8 |
|
Other |
|
|
0.4 |
|
Closed stores |
|
|
0.4 |
|
LGC comparable stores |
|
|
0.2 |
|
New store sales |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
KC comparable stores |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
KCs operating loss decreased in the first quarter of 2009 to $4.3 million compared with $5.5
million in the first quarter of 2008 primarily due to a reduction in selling, general and
administrative expenses as a result of the movement of the LGC distribution operations from a third
party to a KC-managed distribution operation in 2008 and other administrative cost control measures
implemented in early 2009.
KC reported a net loss of $2.8 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared with $3.2 million in
the first quarter of 2008 primarily due to the decrease in operating loss, partially offset by a
lower income tax benefit in the first three months of 2009 from a lower effective income tax rate
on a smaller pre-tax loss compared with the first three months of 2009.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows
The following tables detail the changes in cash flow for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(2.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.2 |
) |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Working capital changes |
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
(15.6 |
) |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for operating activities |
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow before financing activities |
|
$ |
(13.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(18.3 |
) |
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for operating activities decreased $4.3 million primarily due to working capital
changes. The change in working capital was mainly the result of a decrease in intercompany tax
receivables compared with an increase in the first quarter of 2008 primarily due to KCs lower net
loss and a change in the timing of intercompany tax payments, a smaller decrease in accounts
payable primarily due to the timing of payments and an increase in the value of inventory as of
March 31, 2009 compared with a decrease in the value of inventory at March 31, 2008. The change in
value of inventory is primarily the result of lower than anticipated sales in the fourth quarter of
2008 and from mark-downs on products that were being discontinued as part of a program to improve
LGCs product offerings during 2008.
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net additions to long-term debt and
revolving credit agreement |
|
$ |
10.1 |
|
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
|
$ |
(6.8 |
) |
Capital contribution from NACCO |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
$ |
13.1 |
|
|
$ |
17.6 |
|
|
$ |
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities decreased $4.5 million in the first three months of 2009
compared with the first three months of 2008, primarily from lower levels of borrowings, partially
offset by a larger capital contribution from NACCO during the first three months of 2009.
Financing Activities
KCs financing is provided by a $20.0 million secured floating-rate revolving line of credit (the
KC Facility) that expires in July 2010. The obligations under the KC Facility are secured by
substantially all assets of KC. The approximate value of KCs assets held as collateral under the
KC Facility was $70 million as of March 31, 2009. The availability is derived from a borrowing
base formula using KCs eligible inventory, as defined in the KC Facility. At March 31, 2009, the
borrowing base, as defined in the KC Facility, was $20.0 million. Borrowings outstanding under the
KC Facility were $10.1 million at March 31, 2009. Therefore, at March 31, 2009, the excess
availability under the KC Facility was $9.9 million. The KC Facility requires a fee of 0.25% per
annum on the unused commitment. Borrowings bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.85%. The KC Facility
includes restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit capital expenditures and require
that borrowings do not exceed $4.0 million for 30 consecutive days from December 15 to February 13.
The KC Facility also prohibits the payment of dividends to NACCO. At March 31, 2009, KC was in
compliance with the covenants in the KC Facility.
In light of the current economic and market conditions, the Company and KC are continually
monitoring KCs covenant compliance. KC has implemented certain actions and future actions are
being evaluated in connection with covenant compliance. However, given the current economic
environment or a worsening of this environment, there is no assurance that such actions will be
sufficient or in the event KC is required to refinance the KC Facility, if such refinancing could
be obtained on acceptable terms or at all.
KC believes funds available from cash on hand at KC and the Company, the KC Facility and operating
cash flows will provide sufficient liquidity to meet its operating needs and commitments arising
during the next twelve months and until the KC Facility expires in July 2010.
Contractual Obligations, Contingent Liabilities and Commitments
Since December 31, 2008, there have been no significant changes in the total amount of KCs
contractual obligations, contingent liabilities or commercial commitments, or the timing of cash
flows in accordance with those obligations as reported on page 66 in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Capital Expenditures
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment were $0.2 million for the first three months of 2009
and are estimated to be an additional $1.2 million for the remainder of 2009. These planned
capital expenditures are primarily for improvements to KCs information technology infrastructure
and fixtures and equipment at new and existing stores. These expenditures are expected to be
funded from internally generated funds and bank borrowings.
33
Capital Structure
Working capital is significantly affected by the seasonality of KCs business. The following is a
discussion of the changes in KCs capital structure at March 31, 2009 compared with both March 31,
2008 and December 31, 2008.
March 31, 2009 Compared with March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Total net tangible assets |
|
$ |
47.9 |
|
|
$ |
45.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
Goodwill and other intangibles, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets |
|
|
47.9 |
|
|
|
49.3 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Advances from NACCO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
12.5 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
(10.1 |
) |
|
|
(17.0 |
) |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
$ |
37.8 |
|
|
$ |
19.8 |
|
|
$ |
18.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt to total capitalization |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
(39 |
%) |
Total net tangible assets increased $2.7 million at March 31, 2009 compared with March 31, 2008.
The increase was primarily due to a $4.4 million increase in inventory as a result of lower than
anticipated sales in the fourth quarter of 2008 and from mark-downs on products that were being
discontinued as part of a program to improve LGCs product offerings during 2008, as well as a $3.8
million increase in property, plant and equipment primarily due to expenditures for the LGC
distribution operation and the addition of fixtures and equipment at new stores. These items were
partially offset by a $2.1 million increase in accounts payable primarily due to timing of payments
and a $1.4 million increase in other current liabilities due to additional required accruals for
new stores.
During 2008, KC wrote off all of its goodwill and other intangibles, net and recorded a non-cash
impairment charge due to the significant decline in the Companys stock price and uncertain market
conditions.
Other debt decreased primarily as a result of lower borrowing requirements during the first three
months of 2009 compared with the first three months of 2008.
Stockholders equity increased primarily due to $15.1 million of cash and non-cash capital
contributions from NACCO during the twelve month period ending March 31, 2009 and the conversion of
the Advances from NACCO to equity during 2008, partially offset by a net loss of $9.6 million
recognized for the twelve month period ending March 31, 2009.
March 31, 2009 Compared with December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Total net tangible assets |
|
$ |
47.9 |
|
|
$ |
37.5 |
|
|
$ |
10.4 |
|
Total debt |
|
|
(10.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
$ |
37.8 |
|
|
$ |
37.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt to total capitalization |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
% |
Total net tangible assets increased $10.4 million at March 31, 2009 compared with December 31,
2008, primarily from a $9.8 million decrease in accounts payable due to the seasonality of the
business.
Total debt increased as a result of the seasonality of the business and the required funding of
operations during the first three months of 2009. Stockholders equity increased due to $3.1
million of cash and non-cash capital contributions from NACCO during the first three months of 2009
partially offset by KCs net loss of $2.8 million.
OUTLOOK
Uncertainty in the U.S. economy and diminished consumer confidence are expected to continue to
affect consumer traffic to outlet and traditional malls and negatively affect retail spending
decisions in 2009. Nevertheless, KC expects a significant increase in results in 2009 compared
with 2008 due to an anticipated improved holiday selling season in late 2009, expected improved
margins at the Le Gourmet Chef® stores resulting from the conclusion of new product enhancement and
store-merchandising programs, and the completion of a large product clearance program in the Le
Gourmet Chef® stores that significantly reduced margins in 2008. Capital expenditure restraints
34
and administrative cost control measures implemented in late 2008 and early 2009 are also expected
to help results in 2009.
Overall, KC expects that increasing improvements in quarterly results for the remainder of the year
will lead to a significant improvement in full year results compared with 2008 results before
charges for goodwill and intangible impairment of $3.9 million, pre-tax. Cash flow before
financing activities is expected to be slightly negative in 2009, but significantly improved
compared with 2008.
Longer term, KC expects to achieve growth in the Le Gourmet Chef® outlet and traditional mall store
formats, although the total number of Kitchen Collection® and Le Gourmet Chef® stores is unlikely
to increase in 2009.
THE NORTH AMERICAN COAL CORPORATION
Total coal reserves approximate 2.3 billion tons with approximately 1.2 billion tons committed to
customers pursuant to long-term contracts. NACoal has six lignite mining operations: The Coteau
Properties Company (Coteau), The Falkirk Mining Company (Falkirk), The Sabine Mining Company
(Sabine) (collectively, the project mining subsidiaries), San Miguel Lignite Mining Operations
(San Miguel), Red River Mining Company (Red River) and Mississippi Lignite Mining Company
(MLMC). The project mining subsidiaries meet the definition of a variable interest entity
pursuant to FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, and
are accounted for by the equity method. The pre-tax earnings of the project mining subsidiaries are
included on the line Earnings of unconsolidated project mining subsidiaries in the Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company has included the pre-tax earnings of
the project mining subsidiaries as a component of operating profit because they are an integral
part of the Companys business and operating results. The investment in the project mining
subsidiaries is included on the line Other Non-current Assets in the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
FINANCIAL REVIEW
Lignite tons sold by NACoals operating lignite mines were as follows for the three months ended
March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Coteau |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Falkirk |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Sabine |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project mining subsidiaries |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Miguel |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
MLMC |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Red River |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-project mines |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total lignite tons sold |
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The limerock dragline mining operations delivered 1.4 million and 6.8 million cubic yards of
limerock in the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in limerock
yards delivered during the first three months of 2009 was a result of a reduction in customer
requirements due to a decline in the southern Florida housing and construction markets and an
unfavorable legal ruling that set aside NACoals customers mining permits at most of the limerock
dragline mining operations, which is currently being appealed by NACoals customers.
35
The results of operations for NACoal were as follows for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
36.5 |
|
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
Operating profit
|
|
$ |
12.8 |
|
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
Other income (expense)
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
(0.9 |
) |
Net income
|
|
$ |
10.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
See further discussion of the consolidated effective income tax rate in Note 8 of the Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
First Quarter of 2009 Compared with First Quarter of 2008
The following table identifies the components of change in revenues for the first quarter of 2009
compared with the first quarter of 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in 2009 from: |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated coal mining operations |
|
|
6.1 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
0.8 |
|
Royalty income |
|
|
0.6 |
|
Limerock dragline mining operations |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
36.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues for the first quarter of 2009 increased 13.0% to $36.5 million from $32.3 million in the
first quarter of 2008. Revenues increased mainly due to higher revenue at the consolidated coal
mining operations primarily attributable to an increase in tons delivered and contractual price
escalation at MLMC and an increase in contractual pass-through costs at San Miguel. The increase
was partially offset by fewer yards delivered at the Florida limerock dragline mining operations
primarily attributable to an unfavorable legal ruling that set aside NACoals customers mining
permits at most of the limerock dragline mining operations.
The following table identifies the components of change in operating profit for the first quarter
of 2009 compared with the first quarter of 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
Profit |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in 2009 from: |
|
|
|
|
Earnings of unconsolidated project mining subsidiaries |
|
|
1.9 |
|
Consolidated coal and limerock mining operating profit |
|
|
1.7 |
|
Gain on the sale of assets |
|
|
1.6 |
|
Other |
|
|
1.1 |
|
Royalty |
|
|
0.7 |
|
Other selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
12.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit increased to $12.8 million in the first quarter of 2009 from $6.5 million in the
first quarter of 2008, primarily as a result of higher earnings at the unconsolidated project
mining subsidiaries primarily due to an
36
increase in tons delivered and contractual price
escalation, higher consolidated coal and limerock mining operating profit and from gains on the sale of assets,. The increase in consolidated coal and limerock mining operating
profit was mainly from increased tonnage, contractual price escalation and reduced costs for diesel
fuel at the consolidated coal mines.
Net income increased to $10.8 million in the first quarter of 2009 from $3.8 million in the first
quarter of 2008. The increase was primarily due to the increase in operating profit and an
increase in other income (expense) as a result of a gain on an ineffective interest rate swap
contract during the first quarter of 2009 compared with a loss in the first quarter of 2008.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows
The following tables detail the changes in cash flow for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
10.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
Working capital changes |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
4.1 |
|
Proceeds from the sale of assets |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Investments in other unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow before financing activities |
|
$ |
15.6 |
|
|
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
|
$ |
16.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily the result of changes in
working capital and the increase in net income, partially offset by the change in other non-cash
items for the first three months of 2009 compared with the first three months of 2008. The change
in working capital was primarily the result of a larger decrease in intercompany receivables for
tax advances from NACCO, an increase in accounts payable during the first three months of 2009
compared with a decrease in the first three months of 2008 due to the timing of payments, a smaller
decrease in other current liabilities from lower compensation-related payments to employees in the
first three months of 2009 compared with the first three months of 2008 and a decrease in inventory
as a result of a reduction in coal inventory. These changes were partially offset by an increase
in accounts receivable due to higher revenues in the first three months of 2009 compared with the
first three months of 2008. In addition, the change in other operating activities was primarily
from the gain on the sale of assets.
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities increased primarily due to lower levels of
capital expenditures in the first three months of 2009 compared with the first three months of 2008
as a result of lower levels of investments in equipment for its mines and mine development
activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions (reductions) of long-term debt and
revolving credit agreements |
|
$ |
26.7 |
|
|
$ |
(9.4 |
) |
|
$ |
36.1 |
|
Cash dividends paid to NACCO |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
Intercompany loans |
|
|
(39.7 |
) |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
(48.7 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing activities |
|
$ |
(16.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(15.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
Net cash used for financing activities increased during the first three months of 2009 compared
with the first three months of 2008 primarily due to the repayment of intercompany loans and an
increase in the amount of dividends paid to NACCO, partially offset by additional borrowings during
the first three months of 2009.
Financing Activities
NACoal has an unsecured revolving line of credit of up to $75.0 million and an unsecured term loan
of $15.0 million at March 31, 2009 (the NACoal Facility). The term loan requires a final
principal repayment of $15.0 million in March 2010. The NACoal Facility expires in March 2010.
Borrowings outstanding under the NACoal Facility were $35.0 million at March 31, 2009. Therefore,
at March 31, 2009, the excess availability under the NACoal Facility was $40.0 million.
The NACoal Facility has performance-based pricing, which sets interest rates based upon achieving
various levels of debt to EBITDA ratios, as defined in the NACoal Facility. The NACoal Facility
provides for, at NACoals option, Eurodollar loans that bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin based
on the level of debt to EBITDA ratio achieved and Base Rate loans that bear interest at Base Rates
plus the Applicable Margin, as defined in the NACoal Facility. A facility fee, which is determined
based on the level of debt to EBITDA ratio achieved is also applied to the aggregate revolving line
of credit. At March 31, 2009, term loan borrowings outstanding bore interest at LIBOR plus 0.875%
and the revolving credit interest rate was LIBOR plus 0.725%. At March 31, 2009, the revolving
credit facility fee was 0.150% of the unused commitment of the revolving facility.
The NACoal Facility also contains restrictive covenants that require, among other things, NACoal to
maintain certain debt to EBITDA and fixed charge coverage ratios and provides the ability to make
loans, dividends and advances to NACCO, with some restrictions based upon NACoals leverage ratio.
At March 31, 2009, NACoal was in compliance with the covenants in the NACoal Facility.
During 2004 and 2005, NACoal issued unsecured notes totaling $45.0 million in a private placement
(the NACoal Notes), which require annual principal payments of approximately $6.4 million that
began in October 2008 and will mature on October 4, 2014. These unsecured notes bear interest at a
weighted-average fixed rate of 6.08%, payable semi-annually on April 4 and October 4. The NACoal
Notes are redeemable at any time at the option of NACoal, in whole or in part, at an amount equal
to par plus accrued and unpaid interest plus a make-whole premium, if applicable. NACoal had
$38.6 million of the private placement notes outstanding at March 31, 2009. The NACoal Notes
contain certain covenants and restrictions that require, among other things, NACoal to maintain
certain net worth, leverage and interest coverage ratios, and limit dividends to NACCO based upon
NACoals leverage ratio. At March 31, 2009, NACoal was in compliance with the covenants in the
NACoal Notes.
NACoal has a demand note payable to Coteau which bears interest based on the applicable quarterly
federal short-term interest rate as announced from time to time by the Internal Revenue Service.
At March 31, 2009, the balance of the note was $8.8 million and the interest rate was 0.81%.
NACoal believes funds available from the NACoal Facility and operating cash flows will provide
sufficient liquidity to finance all of its scheduled loan principal repayments and its operating
needs and commitments until the expiration of the NACoal Facility in March 2010.
Contractual Obligations, Contingent Liabilities and Commitments
Since December 31, 2008, there have been no significant changes in the total amount of NACoals
contractual obligations, contingent liabilities or commercial commitments, or the timing of cash
flows in accordance with those obligations as reported on page 73 in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Capital Expenditures
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment were $0.7 million during the first three months of
2009. NACoal estimates that its capital expenditures for the remainder of 2009 will be an
additional $24.8 million, primarily for lignite coal reserves, equipment for mining activities and
mine development activities. These expenditures are expected to be funded from internally
generated funds and bank borrowings.
38
Capital Structure
NACoals capital structure is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Total net tangible assets |
|
$ |
124.4 |
|
|
$ |
128.7 |
|
|
$ |
(4.3 |
) |
Coal supply agreements and other intangibles, net |
|
|
65.9 |
|
|
|
66.7 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets |
|
|
190.3 |
|
|
|
195.4 |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
Advances to (from) NACCO |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(38.3 |
) |
|
|
39.6 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
(97.7 |
) |
|
|
(71.1 |
) |
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
$ |
93.9 |
|
|
$ |
86.0 |
|
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt to total capitalization |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
(5 |
%) |
The decrease in total net tangible assets of $4.3 million was primarily due to a $4.3 million
decrease in intercompany accounts receivable as a result of a change in the timing of intercompany
tax payments, a $3.1 million decrease in inventory from a reduction in coal inventory and a $2.0
million increase in accounts payable due to a change in the timing of payments. These items were
partially offset by a $3.2 million increase in accounts receivable primarily from higher revenue in
March 2009 compared with December 2008 and a $2.3 million decrease in other current liabilities
primarily from the payment of compensation-related amounts accrued at December 31, 2008 during the
first quarter of 2009.
Borrowings of other debt increased during the first three months of 2009 primarily from the
repayment of Advances from NACCO.
Stockholders equity increased primarily due to net income of $10.8 million, partially offset by
dividends to NACCO of $3.0 million during the first three months of 2009.
OUTLOOK
NACoals lignite coal mining operations are not significantly affected by the economic downturn
because of NACoals long-term contract structure and continued stable demand for electricity from
the power plants it serves. NACoal expects improved full year results at its lignite coal mining
operations in 2009 provided that customers achieve currently planned power plant operating levels.
Tons delivered at the lignite coal mines are expected to increase in 2009 compared with 2008,
especially at MLMC as a result of fewer planned outage days and improved operating efficiencies at
the customers power plant. However, contractual price escalation at all mines is not expected to
affect results as favorably in 2009 as it did in 2008 because of recent declines in commodity
costs.
Limerock customer projections for 2009 deliveries reflect the continued significant decline in the
southern Florida housing and construction markets. In addition, production will continue to be
significantly decreased due to an unfavorable legal ruling that set aside NACoals customers
mining permits at most of the limerock mining operations. As a result, deliveries from the
limerock dragline mining operations are expected to continue to be significantly lower in 2009.
Customers are expected to reduce inventory levels before returning to production under new permits
that are expected to be issued toward the end of 2009. NACoal has mitigated its financial exposure
to these limerock operations by entering into new cost reimbursable management fee contracts with
the majority of its customers.
Overall, NACoal expects solid operating performance in 2009 with net income somewhat better than
2008. Cash flow before financing activities is expected to be positive, but down from 2008 mainly
due to planned investments in new mining opportunities.
NACoal has a number of potential new projects and opportunities under consideration and expects to
incur additional expenses related to these opportunities in 2009. Permitting is taking place in
NACoals Otter Creek Reserve in North Dakota in expectation of the construction of a new mine.
NACoal is also working on a project with Mississippi Power to provide lignite coal to a new power
plant in Mississippi. Finally, in April 2009, NACoal entered into an agreement to sell the assets
of Red River in Louisiana to its customer for approximately
$42 million in cash, subject to closing adjustments. The sale of Red River is a strategic opportunity in the
context of the impending expiration of the coal supply contract in 2010. NACoal concluded that
this was an appropriate time to monetize and redeploy the value of Red River. The sale of the
mine, which is subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approval, is expected
to generate a substantial gain and enhanced cash flow when the transaction is completed later this
year.
Over the longer term, NACoal expects to continue its efforts to develop new domestic coal projects
and is encouraged that more new project opportunities may become available, including opportunities
for coal-to-liquids,
39
coal gasification and other clean coal technologies. Further, NACoal continues to pursue
additional non-coal mining opportunities, such as consulting services agreements.
NACCO AND OTHER
NACCO and Other includes the parent company operations and Bellaire Corporation, a non-operating
subsidiary of NACCO.
FINANCIAL REVIEW
Operating Results
The results of operations at NACCO and Other were as follows for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
Other income (expense)
|
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(1.5 |
) |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
First Quarter of 2009 Compared with First Quarter of 2008
NACCO and Other recognized an operating loss of $1.1 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared
with $0.7 million in the first quarter of 2008. The change was primarily due to lower management
fees charged to the subsidiaries in the first quarter of 2009 mainly as a result of the expectation
that the parent company plans to incur lower employee-related expenses during 2009. The change in
other income (expense) in the first quarter of 2009 compared with the first quarter of 2008 was
primarily due to lower interest income at the parent company from lower levels of cash investments
and lower interest rates on investments. NACCO and Other recognized a net loss of $1.5 million in
the first quarter of 2009 compared with net income of $0.4 million for the first quarter of 2008
primarily due to the factors affecting operating loss and other income (expense).
Management Fees
The parent company charges management fees to its operating subsidiaries for services provided by
the corporate headquarters. The management fees are based upon estimated parent company resources
devoted to providing centralized services and stewardship activities and are allocated among all
subsidiaries based upon the relative size and complexity of each subsidiary. In order to determine
the allocation of management fees among the subsidiaries each year, the parent company reviews the
time its employees devoted to each operating subsidiary during the prior year and the estimated
costs for providing centralized services and stewardship activities in the next year to determine
the amount of management fees to allocate to each operating subsidiary for that year. In addition,
the parent company reviews the amount of management fees allocated to its operating subsidiaries
each quarter to ensure the amount continues to be reasonable based on the actual costs incurred to
date. The Company believes the allocation method is consistently applied and reasonable.
Following are the parent company management fees for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
NACCO fees included in selling, general
and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NMHG Wholesale |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
HBB |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
NACoal |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Although NACCOs subsidiaries have entered into substantial borrowing agreements, NACCO has not
guaranteed the long-term debt or any borrowings of its subsidiaries. The borrowing agreements at
NMHG, HBB, KC and NACoal allow for the payment to NACCO of management fees, dividends and advances
under certain circumstances. Dividends (to the extent permitted by the subsidiaries borrowing
agreements), advances and management fees from its subsidiaries are the primary sources of cash for
NACCO.
The Company believes funds available from cash on hand, its subsidiaries credit facilities and
anticipated funds to be generated from operations are sufficient to finance all of its
subsidiaries scheduled principal repayments,
40
operating needs and commitments arising during the next twelve months and until the expiration of
its subsidiaries credit facilities.
Contractual Obligations, Contingent Liabilities and Commitments
Since December 31, 2008, there have been no significant changes in the total amount of NACCO and
Other contractual obligations, contingent liabilities or commercial commitments, or the timing of
cash flows in accordance with those obligations as reported on page 77 in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Capital Structure
NACCOs consolidated capital structure is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Total net tangible assets |
|
$ |
784.4 |
|
|
$ |
753.5 |
|
|
$ |
30.9 |
|
Coal supply agreements and other intangibles, net |
|
|
65.9 |
|
|
|
66.7 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets |
|
|
850.3 |
|
|
|
820.2 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
Total debt |
|
|
(495.3 |
) |
|
|
(449.5 |
) |
|
|
(45.8 |
) |
Closed mine obligations, net of tax |
|
|
(14.1 |
) |
|
|
(13.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
$ |
340.9 |
|
|
$ |
356.9 |
|
|
$ |
(16.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt to total capitalization |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
41
EFFECTS OF FOREIGN CURRENCY
NMHG and HBB operate internationally and enter into transactions denominated in foreign currencies.
As a result, the Company is subject to the variability that arises from exchange rate movements.
The effects of foreign currency fluctuations on revenues, operating profit and net income at NMHG
and HBB are addressed in the previous discussions of operating results. See also Item 3,
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, in Part I of this Form 10-Q.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The statements contained in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements are made subject to certain
risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those presented
in these forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no
obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances
that arise after the date hereof. Such risks and uncertainties with respect to each subsidiarys
operations include, without limitation:
NMHG: (1) reduction in demand for lift trucks and related aftermarket parts and service on a
worldwide basis, including the ability of NMHGs dealers and end-users to obtain financing at
reasonable rates as a result of current economic conditions, (2) changes in sales prices, (3)
delays in delivery or increases in costs, including transportation costs, of raw materials or
sourced products and labor, (4) exchange rate fluctuations, changes in foreign import tariffs and
monetary policies and other changes in the regulatory climate in the foreign countries in which
NMHG operates and/or sells products, (5) delays in, increased costs from or reduced benefits from
restructuring programs, (6) customer acceptance of, changes in the prices of, or delays in the
development of new products, (7) introduction of new products by, or more favorable product pricing
offered by, NMHGs competitors, (8) delays in manufacturing and delivery schedules, (9) changes in
or unavailability of suppliers, (10) bankruptcy of or loss of major dealers, retail customers or
suppliers, (11) product liability or other litigation, warranty claims or returns of products, (12)
the effectiveness of the cost reduction programs implemented globally, including the successful
implementation of procurement and sourcing initiatives, (13) acquisitions and/or dispositions of
dealerships by NMHG, (14) changes mandated by federal and state regulation, including health,
safety or environmental legislation, (15) the ability of NMHG and its dealers and suppliers to
access credit in the current economic environment and (16) the ability of NMHG to obtain future
financing on reasonable terms or at all.
HBB: (1) changes in the sales prices, product mix or levels of consumer purchases of small
electric appliances, (2) changes in consumer retail and credit markets, (3) bankruptcy of or loss
of major retail customers or suppliers, (4) changes in costs, including transportation costs, of
sourced products, (5) delays in delivery of sourced products, (6) changes in, or unavailability of
quality or cost effective, suppliers, (7) exchange rate fluctuations, changes in the foreign import
tariffs and monetary policies and other changes in the regulatory climate in the foreign countries
in which HBB buys, operates and/or sells products, (8) product liability, regulatory actions or
other litigation, warranty claims or returns of products, (9) customer acceptance of, changes in
costs of, or delays in the development of new products, (10) increased competition, including
consolidation within the industry, (11) the ability of HBB and its customers and suppliers to
access credit in the current economic environment and (12) the ability of HBB to obtain future
financing on reasonable terms or at all.
KC: (1) changes in gasoline prices, weather conditions, the level of consumer confidence and
disposable income as a result of the current financial crisis or other events or other conditions
that may adversely affect the number of customers visiting Kitchen Collection® and Le Gourmet Chef®
stores, (2) changes in the sales prices, product mix or levels of consumer purchases of
kitchenware, small electric appliances and gourmet foods, (3) changes in costs, including
transportation costs, of inventory, (4) delays in delivery or the unavailability of inventory, (5)
customer acceptance of new products, (6) increased competition and (7) the ability to obtain future
financing on reasonable terms or at all.
NACoal: (1) weather conditions, extended power plant outages or other events that would change the
level of customers lignite coal or limerock requirements, (2) weather or equipment problems that
could affect lignite coal or limerock deliveries to customers, (3) changes in mining permit
requirements that could affect deliveries to customers, including the resumption of Florida
limerock mining, (4) changes in costs related to geological conditions, repairs and maintenance,
new equipment and replacement parts, fuel or other similar items, (5) costs to pursue and develop
new mining opportunities, including costs in connection with NACoals joint ventures, (6)
consummation of the sale of Red River, (7) changes in U.S. regulatory requirements, including
changes in power plant emission regulations, (8) changes in the power industry that would affect
demand for NACoals reserves, (9) the ability of NACoals utility customers to access credit
markets to maintain current liquidity and (10) the ability of NACoal to obtain future financing on
reasonable terms or at all.
42
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
See pages 80, F-19, F-20, F-34, F-35, F-36, F-37 and F-38 of the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for a discussion of the Companys derivative hedging
policies and use of financial instruments. There have been no material changes in the Companys
market risk exposures since December 31, 2008.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures: An evaluation was carried out under the
supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the principal
executive officer and the principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on
that evaluation, these officers have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures are effective.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting: During the first quarter of 2009, there have
been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
43
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 Legal Proceedings
None
Item 1A Risk Factors
No changes
Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table provides information regarding the Companys stock repurchase program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
|
|
of Shares (or |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
of Shares Purchased |
|
|
Value) that May Yet |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Paid per |
|
|
as Part of the Publicly |
|
|
Be Purchased Under |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Announced Program |
|
|
the Program (1) |
|
January 1 to 31, 2009 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
100,000,000 |
|
February 1 to 28, 2009 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
100,000,000 |
|
March 1 to 31, 2009 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
100,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
100,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On November 15, 2007, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had
authorized a stock repurchase program (the Program). Under the terms of the Program,
the Company may repurchase up to a total of $100.0 million of shares of the Companys
Class A Common Stock. The Company may repurchase shares on the open market or in
privately negotiated transactions, including block trades. The Program has no
expiration date. During the first quarter of 2009, the Company did not make any
purchases under the terms of the Program. |
Item 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5 Other Information
None
Item 6 Exhibits
See Exhibit index on page 46 of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
44
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NACCO Industries, Inc.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: May 5, 2009 |
/s/ Kenneth C. Schilling
|
|
|
Kenneth C. Schilling |
|
|
Vice President and Controller
(Authorized Officer and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
45
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number* |
|
Description of Exhibits |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
The NACCO Materials Handling Group, Inc. Unfunded Benefit Plan (As Amended and Restated April
24, 2009) is attached hereto as Exhibit 10.1. |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
The NACCO Industries, Inc. Unfunded Benefit Plan for Terminated NMHG Employees is attached
hereto as Exhibit 10.2. |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Consulting Agreement between NACCO Industries, Inc. and Michael J. Morecroft, dated February
10, 2009 (effective as of June 30, 2008) is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Company on February 12, 2009,
Commission File Number 1-9172. |
|
|
|
31(i)(1)
|
|
Certification of Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the
Exchange Act |
|
|
|
31(i)(2)
|
|
Certification of Kenneth C. Schilling pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed and dated by Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. and Kenneth C. Schilling |
|
|
|
* |
|
Numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K. |
46