Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ý | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
ý |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
CMS Energy Corporation | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
||||
ý |
No fee required. |
|||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
CMS ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
MAY 16, 2014
To Fellow Shareholders of CMS Energy Corporation:
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of CMS Energy Corporation ("CMS" or the "Corporation") will be held on Friday, May 16, 2014, at 9:00 A.M., Eastern Daylight Saving Time, at our corporate headquarters located at One Energy Plaza, Jackson, Michigan 49201. The purposes of the Annual Meeting are to:
The Board of Directors recommends a vote "FOR" proposals 1 through 5. The proxy holders will use their discretion to vote on any other matters that may arise at the Annual Meeting.
Our Annual Report to Shareholders for the year 2013, including the Form 10-K with our consolidated financial statements, accompanies this Proxy Statement, unless you have previously requested Internet access rather than a paper copy.
If you were a shareholder of record at the close of business on March 21, 2014, you are entitled to vote. Every vote is important. Please vote using a touch-tone telephone, Internet, by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card or by casting a ballot in person at the Annual Meeting. You can help minimize our costs by promptly voting via telephone or Internet. We strongly encourage you to cast your proxy vote and exercise your right as a shareholder.
All shareholders are invited to attend our Annual Meeting. Shareholders interested in attending the Annual Meeting must present proof of current CMS stock ownership (such as a recent account statement) and government-issued photo identification (such as a driver's license) prior to being admitted to the meeting.
|
By Order of the Board of Directors | |
|
Melissa M. Gleespen |
CMS
Energy Corporation
One Energy Plaza
Jackson, Michigan 49201
April 4, 2014
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to Be Held on May 16, 2014
This Proxy Statement and the Annual Report to Shareholders are available at: www.cmsenergy.com.
PROXY STATEMENT
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE 2014 ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING
The Board of Directors (the "Board") of CMS Energy Corporation ("CMS" or the "Corporation") solicits your proxy for our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 16, 2014. We are releasing this Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy card to shareholders on or about April 4, 2014.
The terms "we" and "our" as used in this Proxy Statement generally refer to CMS and its collective affiliates, including its principal subsidiary, Consumers Energy Company ("Consumers"). While established, operated and regulated as separate legal entities and publicly traded companies, CMS and Consumers historically have had the same individuals serve as members of both Boards and Committees of the Boards and adopted coordinated director and executive compensation arrangements and plans as well as auditing relationships. The two companies also historically have significant overlap in executive management. Thus, in certain contexts in this Proxy Statement, the terms "we" and "our" refer to each of CMS and Consumers and satisfy their respective disclosure obligations. In addition, the disclosures frequently reference "Boards" and "Committees" and similar plural presentations to reflect these parallel structures of CMS and Consumers.
1
each matter that comes before the Annual Meeting. All shares represented by valid proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting.
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee you are considered the beneficial owner of the shares and your shares are said to be held in "street name." Street name holders generally cannot vote their shares directly and must instead instruct the brokerage firm, bank or other nominee how to vote their shares using the method described under "How do I vote my shares?" below. If you hold your shares in a brokerage account but you fail to return your voting instruction card to your broker, stock exchange rules will determine whether your broker may vote your shares without first receiving instructions from you on an item being presented to shareholders for approval at the Annual Meeting.
You can help minimize our costs by promptly voting via touch-tone telephone or Internet.
If your shares are voted by proxy, the shares will be voted as you instruct. If you sign and return your proxy card, but do not give any specific voting instructions on your proxy card, your shares will be voted as the Board recommends. Your shares will also be voted as recommended by the Board, in its discretion, on any other business that is properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting.
If your shares are held in street name, you must vote your shares in the manner prescribed by your brokerage firm, bank or other nominee. Your brokerage firm, bank or other nominee should provide a voting instruction form for you to use in directing it how to vote your shares.
2
If you are the beneficial owner of your shares held in street name, you may submit new voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee.
With respect to Proposal 1 below, the election of each director requires approval from a majority of the votes cast by the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors (see Corporate Governance, Majority Voting Standard later in this Proxy Statement for additional information about the application of this standard). On Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5, approval requires votes "for" by a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote thereon.
Under the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. ("NYSE") listing standards, if your broker, bank or other nominee holds your shares in its name and does not receive voting instructions from you, your broker, bank or other nominee has discretion to vote these shares on "routine" matters only and will not be able to vote on non-routine items. For purposes of the Annual Meeting, we understand that the proposal relating to the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm will be treated as a routine item, but all other proposals will be non-routine items. On routine items, broker discretionary votes are counted toward determining the outcome of those items. Broker discretionary votes are counted toward establishing a quorum.
3
4
The Boards have adopted Amended and Restated Corporate Governance Principles (the "Principles") that reflect corporate and Board practices as well as SEC rules and NYSE listing standards. The Principles describe the role of the Boards and their Committees, the selection and role of the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), the composition and meeting procedures of the Boards and their Committees, as well as Board and Committee compensation and self-evaluation matters. The Governance Committees are responsible for overseeing and reviewing the Principles at least annually and recommending any proposed changes to the Boards for approval. The Boards have adopted Charters for each of their standing Committees, except the Executive Committees, that detail their purposes and duties, composition, meetings, resources and authority as well as other aspects of Committee activities. Each Committee reviews its Charter annually and recommends changes to the Governance Committees for review and recommendation to the Boards for approval.
The current versions of our Principles, the Charters of our standing Committees (other than the Executive Committees), and other corporate governance information, including our Employee and Director Codes of Conduct, are available through our website at www.cmsenergy.com/corporategovernance.
The Boards provide oversight with respect to our overall performance, strategic direction and key corporate policies. They approve major initiatives, advise on key financial and business objectives, and monitor progress with respect to these matters. Directors are kept informed of our business by various reports and documents provided to them on a regular basis, including operating and financial reports made at Board and Committee meetings by our CEO, Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") and other officers. The Boards have five standing Committees, the principal responsibilities of which are described under Board and Committee Information below.
The Principles provide that the Boards have determined, for the present time, it is in the best interests of the Corporation and its shareholders to keep the offices of CEO and Chairman of the Board ("Chairman") separate to enhance oversight responsibilities. The Boards believe that this leadership structure promotes independent and effective oversight of management on key issues relating to long-range business plans, long-range strategic issues and risks. In addition, at any time when the Chairman is not considered independent under NYSE listing standards and our Principles, a Presiding Director will be chosen by the independent directors to coordinate the activities and preside at the executive sessions attended only by the independent members of the Boards.
The Boards' risk oversight process includes receiving regular reports from members of senior management on areas of material risk to the Corporation including operational, legal, regulatory, financial, strategic, compliance and reputational risks. The Boards receive an annual risk management review from the Corporation's Executive Director of Risk in addition to the risk oversight functions performed by the various Committees of the Boards. The risk oversight functions performed by the Committees include: (1) a review by the Audit Committees of the risks associated with the Corporation's operating and financial activities which have an impact on its financial and other disclosure reporting as well as a review of the Corporation's policies on risk assessment, control and accounting risk exposure; (2) the Audit Committees' review and approval of risk management policies; (3) a review by the Compensation and Human Resources Committees (the "Compensation Committees") of the risks
5
associated with the Corporation's executive compensation policies and practices; and (4) the Compensation Committees' review of management's assessment of the likelihood that the Corporation's incentive compensation plans will have a material adverse impact on the Corporation.
Management annually undertakes a comprehensive review of the compensation policies and practices throughout the organization in order to assess the risks presented by such policies and practices. Following this year's review, we have determined that such policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Corporation. Management's analysis and determination were presented to and reviewed by the Compensation Committees.
In accordance with NYSE listing standards and the Principles adopted by the Boards, a majority of the directors of each Board must be independent. A director is independent if he or she has no material relationship with CMS or Consumers and otherwise satisfies the independence requirements of the NYSE listing standards and our more stringent director independence guidelines included in our Principles posted at www.cmsenergy.com/corporategovernance. A director is "independent" under the NYSE listing standards if the Boards affirmatively determine that the director has no material relationship with CMS or Consumers directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with CMS or Consumers, and otherwise satisfies the independence requirements. The Boards have established categorical standards to assist them in determining director independence. According to these standards, a director is independent if:
The Boards undertook their annual review of director and committee member independence, including a review of each non-employee director's charitable affiliations vis-à-vis CMS and Consumers charitable
6
contributions, including matching contributions, at their January 2014 meetings. During this review, the Boards considered any transactions, relationships or arrangements as required by the director independence guidelines included in our Principles. The Boards also reviewed transactions occurring between CMS or Consumers and any entity (or any subsidiary of such entity) on which one of our directors also serves as a director. The Boards identified the following relationships which they deemed were immaterial to such directors' independence:
In January 2014, the Boards concluded that each of the non-employee directors satisfies the independence guidelines set forth in our Principles and had no material relationships with either CMS or Consumers directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with CMS or Consumers. The Boards affirmed the "independent" status (in accordance with the NYSE listing standards and the Principles) of each of the following 11 directors: Jon E. Barfield, Kurt L. Darrow, Stephen E. Ewing, Richard M. Gabrys, William D. Harvey, David W. Joos, Philip R. Lochner, Jr., Michael T. Monahan, Kenneth L. Way, Laura H. Wright and John B. Yasinsky. Mr. Russell is not independent due to his employment relationship with the Corporation.
Directors Barfield, Gabrys, Lochner, Monahan and Wright serve on the Audit Committees of our Boards. Each member of the Audit Committee is independent as defined in the NYSE listing standards and the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.
Directors Darrow, Ewing, Harvey, Way and Yasinsky serve on the Compensation Committees of our Boards. Each of these directors satisfies the independence tests set forth in the NYSE listing standards, the regulations under Section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code ("IRC") and Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").
Under the Boards' majority voting standard, as contained in the CMS Articles of Incorporation and the Principles, any director nominee who receives less than a majority of the votes cast by the Corporation's shareholders at a regular election shall promptly tender his or her resignation. For this purpose, a majority of the votes cast means that the number of shares voted "for" a director must exceed 50% of the votes cast with respect to that director, without regard to the effect of abstentions. Upon receipt of such a tendered resignation, the Governance Committees shall consider and recommend to the Boards whether to accept or decline the resignation. The Boards will act on the Governance Committees' recommendation within 90 days following certification of the shareholder vote, and contemporaneously with that action will cause the Corporation to publicly disclose the Boards' decision whether to accept or decline such director's resignation offer (and the reasons for rejecting the resignation offer, if appropriate). The director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to the standard will not be involved in either the Governance Committees' recommendation or the Boards' decision to accept or decline the resignation. Due to complications that arise in the event of a contested election of directors, this standard would not apply in that context, and the underlying plurality vote requirement of Michigan law would control any contested director elections.
7
CMS has adopted a code of ethics, titled "Employee Code of Conduct and Guide to Ethical Business Behavior" (the "Employee Code of Conduct") that applies to its CEO, CFO and Chief Accounting Officer ("CAO"), as well as all other officers and employees of the Corporation and its affiliates, including Consumers. CMS and Consumers have also adopted a code of ethics titled "Directors' Code of Conduct" that applies to the members of the Boards. The Governance Committees annually review the codes of ethics and recommend changes to the Boards, as appropriate. The Employee Code of Conduct is administered by the Chief Compliance Officer ("CCO"), who reports directly to the Audit Committees. The Audit Committees oversee compliance with the codes of ethics for employees and directors. Any alleged violation of the Directors' Code of Conduct by a director will be investigated by disinterested members of the Audit Committees, or if none, by disinterested members of the Boards. The Governance Committees recommend actions to the Boards in the event a determination is made that a director violated the Directors' Code of Conduct. Any waivers of, or exceptions to, a provision of the Employee Code of Conduct that applies to our CEO, CFO, CAO or persons performing similar functions and any waivers of, or exceptions to, a provision of our Directors' Code of Conduct will be disclosed on our website at www.cmsenergy.com/complianceandethics. No waivers or exceptions were granted in 2013. The Employee Code of Conduct and the Directors' Code of Conduct are posted on our website at www.cmsenergy.com/complianceandethics.
CMS and Consumers shareholders, employees or third parties can communicate with the Boards, Committees of the Boards, the independent directors as a group, or an individual director, including our Chairman or our Presiding Director (if any), by sending written communications c/o the Corporate Secretary, CMS Energy Corporation or Consumers Energy Company, One Energy Plaza, Jackson, Michigan 49201. The Corporate Secretary will forward such communications to the Boards, or the appropriate Committees, group of directors or individual director. Further information regarding shareholder, employee or other third-party communications with the Boards or their Committees, the independent directors or individual members of the Boards can be accessed on our website at www.cmsenergy.com/corporategovernance.
In addition, the Corporation has an on-going outreach program to develop and maintain communication with its largest institutional shareholders in regards to governance and compensation issues. The Corporation values these discussions and the Board considers the pertinent feedback when evaluating corporate governance and compensation issues.
Any shareholder, employee or third party who wishes to submit a compliance concern to the Boards or applicable Committees, including complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters to the Audit Committees, may do so by any of the following means:
All such communications will be reviewed by the CCO (who reports directly to the Audit Committees of the Boards) prior to being forwarded to the Boards or applicable Committees or directors.
8
CMS, Consumers or one of their subsidiaries may occasionally enter into transactions with certain related parties. "Related Parties" include directors or executive officers, beneficial owners of 5% or more of CMS Common Stock, family members of such persons, and entities in which such persons have a direct or indirect material interest. We consider a related party transaction to have occurred when a Related Party enters into a transaction in which the Corporation is participating, the transaction amount is more than $10,000 and the Related Party has or will have a direct or indirect material interest ("Related Party Transaction").
In accordance with our Employee Code of Conduct and our Directors' Code of Conduct, Related Party Transactions must be pre-approved by the Audit Committees. In drawing its conclusion on any approval request, the Audit Committees should consider the following factors:
The policies and procedures relating to the Audit Committees' approval of Related Party Transactions are found in the Employee Code of Conduct and Directors' Code of Conduct which are available on our website at www.cmsenergy.com/complianceandethics.
There are no Related Party Transactions to report.
In accordance with our Employee Code of Conduct and the Directors' Code of Conduct (collectively, the "Codes"), CMS' and Consumers' employees and directors may not engage in pledging or purchasing on margin CMS securities, "trading" of CMS securities or selling "short" CMS securities or buying or selling puts or calls, hedges or other derivative securities relating to CMS securities, including compensatory awards of equity securities or CMS securities otherwise held, directly or indirectly, by those persons. For purposes of these Codes, "trading" means a combination or pattern of substantial or continuous buying and selling of securities with the primary objective of realizing short-term gains. Selling "short" is a technique in which investors bet on a stock price falling by selling securities they do not own with the understanding that they will buy them back, hopefully at a lower price.
Board and Committee Information
The CMS Board met 8 times and the Consumers Board met 7 times during 2013. Our Principles state the expectation that all Board members will attend all scheduled board and committee meetings, as well as the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. During 2013, 9 incumbent directors attended 100% of the CMS Board and assigned committee meetings and 2 incumbent directors attended at least 81% of the CMS Board and assigned committee meetings while they were on the Board. For Consumers during 2013, 9 incumbent directors attended 100% of the Consumers Board and assigned committee meetings and 2 incumbent directors attended at least 80% of the Consumers Board and assigned committee meetings while they were on the Board. All then-current Board members attended the CMS and Consumers 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
9
The Boards each have five standing Committees including an Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Executive Committee, Finance Committee and Governance Committee. The members and the responsibilities of the standing Committees of the Boards are listed below. Each Committee is composed entirely of "independent" directors, as that term is defined by the NYSE listing standards and the Principles described above. Mr. John G. Russell also routinely attends committee meetings. According to the Principles, each year the Boards and each of their standing Committees conduct a performance evaluation of their respective previous year's performance. The Boards also conduct individual director peer evaluations periodically. The Principles are incorporated by reference into each Committee Charter.
On a regularly-scheduled basis, the non-management directors meet in executive session (that is, with no employee directors present) and may invite such members of management to attend as they determine appropriate. At least once each year, the independent directors meet in executive session in conformance with the NYSE listing standards. In 2013, the CMS independent directors met 5 times and the Consumers independent directors met 4 times. Mr. Philip R. Lochner, Jr. as Presiding Director during 2013, presided over these executive sessions of the independent directors.
Standing Committee Membership Summary
Name
|
Audit(1) | Compensation and Human Resources(1) |
Finance(1) | Governance and Public Responsibility(1) |
Executive | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jon E. Barfield |
X | X | ||||||||||||||
Kurt L. Darrow |
X | | X | | ||||||||||||
Stephen E. Ewing |
X | X | ||||||||||||||
Richard M. Gabrys |
X | X | ||||||||||||||
William D. Harvey |
X | X | ||||||||||||||
David W. Joos |
X | * | ||||||||||||||
Philip R. Lochner, Jr. |
X | X | * | X | ||||||||||||
Michael T. Monahan |
X | * | X | X | ||||||||||||
John G. Russell |
||||||||||||||||
Kenneth L. Way |
X | X | * | X | ||||||||||||
Laura H. Wright |
X | X | ||||||||||||||
John B. Yasinsky |
X | * | X | X |
10
Meetings during 2013: CMS 7; Consumers 7
Messrs. Monahan, Barfield and Gabrys, and Ms. Wright qualify as "audit committee financial experts" as such term is defined by the SEC.
The primary functions of the Audit Committees are (subject to the conditions noted in the Report of the Audit Committees later in this Proxy Statement) to oversee the integrity of CMS' and Consumers' consolidated financial statements and financial information, the financial reporting process and the system of internal accounting and financial controls and to retain CMS' and Consumers' independent auditors. The Audit Committees pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent auditors, assess the independent auditors' qualifications and independence and review the independent auditors' performance. The Audit Committees also oversee compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements and with the Corporation's codes of ethics, and oversee our risk management policies, controls and exposures. In addition, the Audit Committees review the performance of the internal audit function and prepare the Report of the Audit Committees for inclusion in the Proxy Statement.
COMPENSATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEES
Meetings during 2013: CMS 5; Consumers 5
The primary functions of the Compensation Committees are to review and approve the Corporation's executive compensation structure and policies and set the CEO compensation level. The Compensation Committees review and recommend to the Boards incentive compensation plans, review and approve the grant of stock and other stock-based awards pursuant to the Corporation's incentive plans and review and approve corporate financial and business goals and target awards, and the payment of performance incentives, pursuant to the Corporation's annual incentive plans. The Compensation Committees also produce an annual report of the Compensation Committees to be included in the Corporation's Proxy Statement as required by SEC rules and regulations. In addition, the Compensation Committees are responsible for reviewing and approving the CEO's selection of candidates for officer positions and recommending such candidates to the Boards for annual or ad hoc election as officers, reviewing and advising the Boards concerning the Corporation's management succession plan and reviewing the Corporation's organizational and leadership development plans and programs.
As part of the regular review process to determine if our compensation arrangements with our executive officers are appropriate, the Compensation Committees directly retained Pay Governance LLC ("Pay Governance") as their independent executive compensation consultant. See the Objectives of Our Compensation Program section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for additional information about the services provided to the Compensation Committees by Pay Governance.
Meetings during 2013: CMS 3; Consumers 3
The primary functions of the Finance Committees are to review and make recommendations to the Boards concerning the financing and investment plans and policies of the Corporation. Their responsibilities include approving short- and long-term financing plans, approving financial policies relating to cash flow, capital structure and dividends, recommending Board action to declare dividends, reviewing potential project investments and other significant capital expenditures and monitoring the progress of significant capital projects.
11
GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEES
Meetings during 2013: CMS 5; Consumers 5
The primary functions of the Governance Committees are to establish and review the Principles, identify and recommend director candidates, consider resignations of directors, review the operation and performance of the Boards and Committees and review public responsibility matters. The Governance Committees also review the codes of ethics and recommend actions to the Boards in cases where directors have violated the Directors' Code of Conduct. The Governance Committees consider director candidates recommended by shareholders if they are: submitted in writing to the Corporate Secretary within the required time frame preceding the annual meeting; include the candidate's written consent to serve; and include relevant information about the candidate as provided in the Bylaws and as determined by the Governance Committees.
Director candidates are sought whose particular background, experiences or qualities meet the needs of the Boards as may be determined by the Boards from time to time and who will add value, perspective and expertise to the Boards' deliberations. The Governance Committees ensure that reference and background checks are conducted on all director candidates prior to joining the Boards. The Governance Committees have not established any specific, minimum qualifications that must be met by director candidates or identified any specific qualities or skills that they believe our directors must possess. Although the Governance Committees have not established a formal policy on diversity, the Boards and the Governance Committees believe it is important that our directors represent diverse viewpoints and backgrounds. The Governance Committees take a wide range of factors into account in evaluating the suitability of director candidates, including business experience; leadership skills; and regulated utility, governance, accounting, finance, legal, compensation and human resources experience which will bring a diversity of thought, perspective, approach and options to the Boards. The Governance Committees do not have any single method for identifying director candidates but will consider candidates suggested by a wide range of sources. In 2013, the Governance Committees retained a search firm (Russell Reynolds Associates) to assist in the identification and assessment of potential director candidates which identified Mr. Kurt L. Darrow. Mr. Darrow was elected to the Boards effective November 15, 2013. He is the only director nominee for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders who is standing for election by the shareholders for the first time.
Shareholders can submit recommendations of nominees for election to the Boards by following the directions previously outlined in this Proxy Statement under the heading: GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE 2014 ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING.
Meetings during 2013: None.
The primary function of the Executive Committees is to exercise the power and authority of the Boards as may be necessary during the intervals between meetings of the Boards, subject to such limitations as are provided by law or by resolution of the Boards.
12
PROPOSAL 1: ELECT THE 11 DIRECTOR NOMINEES TO THE CORPORATION'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The nominees for directors are proposed to serve on the Boards of each of CMS and Consumers, to hold office until the next annual meeting and until their successors are elected and qualified. The Boards believe that the nominees will be available to serve, but in the event any nominee is unable to do so, the CMS proxy will be voted for a substitute nominee designated by the Boards or the number of directors constituting the full Boards will be reduced accordingly. All of the nominees are currently serving as directors and have accepted nomination and agree to serve if elected. Mr. Darrow was appointed to the Boards in November 2013, but he was not previously elected by shareholders. One current board member, Michael T. Monahan, is not standing for re-election to the Boards having attained the mandatory retirement age of 75, as set forth in the Principles. Consequently, effective with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 16, 2014, the size of the Boards is expected to be reduced by one member for a total of 11 members.
The name, age and business experience of each nominee follows, as well as a description of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills of each nominee that led to the conclusion that such nominee should serve as director. In addition to the qualifications listed below, other than Mr. Darrow, who was appointed in November 2013, each of the directors serving on the Boards in 2013 attended at least one continuing education program in 2013 sponsored by a recognized utility industry or corporate governance organization. To assist the Boards in remaining current with their board duties, committee responsibilities and the many important developments impacting the Corporation, CMS participates in the NYSE-Corporate Board Member Board Education Program. This NYSE program offers the Corporation's directors access to a wide range of in-person, peer-based and webinar educational programs on corporate governance, committee duties, board leadership and industry developments. Also, the Corporation has an internal director education program in which all directors participate annually. The internal program includes Corporate and industry information disseminated through orientation programs, business training modules and reports and CMS operational site visits.
Jon E. Barfield, 62, is president and chief executive officer of LJ Holdings Investment Company LLC, a private investment company. In March 2012, he retired from Bartech Group, Inc. ("Bartech") where he served since 1981 as president and from 1995 to March 2012 as chairman and president of this industry-leading professional services firm, with headquarters in Southfield, Michigan, delivering talent management and managed service provider solutions to Global 1000 firms. Bartech employs and manages the daily work assignments for more than 26,000 associates and more than $2.5 billion in procurement for major employers around the world, making Bartech one of the largest, independent talent management and managed service provider firms in the United States. During the past five years, Mr. Barfield previously served as a director of BMC Software, Inc., Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc., Dow Jones & Company, and National City Corp. He has been a director of CMS and Consumers since August 2005.
A graduate of Princeton University and Harvard Law School, Mr. Barfield brings to the Boards legal knowledge and experience, having practiced corporate and securities law at Sidley Austin LLP. His qualifications to serve as a director stem primarily through his experiences as a senior leader, and his varied service as a director with considerable experience regarding legal risk oversight and risk management, financial reporting, attracting and retaining key talent and related human resources experience, corporate governance, and mergers and acquisitions. He served for many years as chairman of the audit committee of the Princeton University Board of Trustees and he is currently a director of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan.
Kurt L. Darrow, 59, has served since 2003 as the president and chief executive officer of La-Z-Boy Incorporated, an integrated furniture retailer and manufacturer. Since joining the company in 1979, he has served in positions of increased responsibility, including president of La-Z-Boy Residential, its
13
largest division. Mr. Darrow currently serves as Chairman of the Board of La-Z-Boy Incorporated. He has been a director of CMS and Consumers since November 2013.
Mr. Darrow's qualifications for service on the Boards include his extensive public company experience spanning more than 30 years, and his thorough strategic, marketing and leadership experience and customer orientation derived from his varying roles at La-Z-Boy Incorporated, including his current chairman and chief executive officer roles. Mr. Darrow is a member of the Business Leaders for Michigan, a non-profit executive leadership organization, and serves on its executive committee. He serves as a director of the American Home Furnishings Alliance and is vice chairman of the board of directors of the Mercy Memorial Hospital Corporation. Mr. Darrow served as a Trustee of Adrian College until May 2011. Mr. Darrow holds a bachelor's degree in business administration from Adrian College.
Stephen E. Ewing, 70, retired in 2006 as vice chairman of DTE Energy, a Detroit-based diversified energy company involved in the development and management of energy-related businesses and services nationwide and from 2001 to 2005 was the Group President of the Gas Division of DTE Energy. He currently serves on the board of National Fuel Gas Company, a diversified energy company. He has been a director of CMS and Consumers since July 2009.
He brings to the Boards valuable hands-on experience in the regulated gas and electric utility business. He was the president and chief executive officer of Michigan Consolidated Gas Company until it was acquired by DTE Energy in 2001. He was the former president and chief operating officer of MCN Energy. During his energy industry career, he also gained in-depth environmental experience related to exploration, production, drilling, mid-stream operations and hybrid vehicles. He is a director of AAA Michigan and also is chairman of the Auto Club Group. He serves as director of The Auto Club Trust, FSB, which conducts business as AAA Bank, Nebraska. He also serves as the immediate past chairman of The Skillman Foundation.
Richard M. Gabrys, 72, is the former interim dean of the School of Business Administration of Wayne State University and the retired vice chairman of Deloitte LLP, a consulting firm. During his 42 years at Deloitte LLP, he served a variety of public companies, especially automotive manufacturing companies, financial services institutions, public utilities, and health care entities. He is the chief executive officer of Mears Investments, LLC, a private family investment group. Mr. Gabrys serves as the lead director of La-Z-Boy Incorporated and as a director of TriMas Corporation. He served on the board of Massey Energy Company until June 2011 and Dana Corporation until January 2008. He has been a director of CMS and Consumers since May 2005.
As an active certified public accountant, member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Michigan Association of Certified Public Accountants, the Boards benefit from Mr. Gabrys' thorough knowledge and expertise in the accounting and financial services fields. In addition, he serves on the boards of Renaissance Venture Capital Fund, Detroit Regional Chamber, Alliance for a Safer Greater Detroit (Crime Stoppers), the Detroit Institute of Arts and the Karmanos Cancer Institute.
William D. Harvey, 65, retired in March 2012 as chairman and chief executive officer of Alliant Energy Corporation ("Alliant") and its two utility subsidiaries, Interstate Power & Light Company and Wisconsin Power & Light Company ("WPL"). Mr. Harvey served in those positions since February 2006. Alliant is a Madison, Wisconsin-based public utility holding company, which provides regulated electricity and natural gas services through its subsidiary companies. He is a general partner of Shade Tree Investments Limited Partnership, a private family investment group. He has been a director of CMS and Consumers since August 2012.
Mr. Harvey holds a bachelor's degree in Economics and a Juris Doctorate, both from the University of Wisconsin. He brings to the Boards legal knowledge and experience, having begun his career as an attorney in private practice and serving as General Counsel of WPL. Mr. Harvey's qualifications for
14
service on the Boards include his long-term experience with public utility operations and publicly traded companies, knowledge of customer perspectives, utility and environmental regulations and safety and diversity initiatives. Mr. Harvey currently serves as a director of Sentry Insurance Company.
David W. Joos, 61, has served since May 2010 as Chairman of the Boards of CMS and Consumers. He served from October 2004 to May 2010 as president and chief executive officer of CMS and chief executive officer of Consumers. Prior to that, he served from 2001 to 2004 as president and chief operating officer of CMS and Consumers; from 2000 to 2001 as executive vice president and chief operating officerelectric of CMS; and from 1997 to 2000 as president and chief executive officerelectric of Consumers. He is a director of Steelcase, Inc. and AECOM Technology Corporation. He has been a director of CMS and Consumers since 2001.
He brings to the Boards knowledge and experience gained throughout his more than 28 years with Consumers and CMS including his extensive knowledge and practical experience in engineering, operations and maintenance of power plants and utility systems. Managing a regulated utility has also built for him a solid foundation in utility regulation, governmental affairs, corporate governance, human resources and environmental expertise which benefit the Boards. Mr. Joos holds a bachelor's degree in engineering science and a master's degree in nuclear engineering from Iowa State University and completed the Harvard Business School Program for Management Development in 1989. He has worked extensively in the nuclear power industry. He served on the board and executive committee of Business Leaders for Michigan until 2013.
Philip R. Lochner, Jr., 71, is a director of public companies, including CLARCOR Inc., Crane Co. and Gentiva Health Services, Inc. During the past five years, he previously served as a director of GTech Holdings, Inc., Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Adelphia Communications Corporation (which he joined after it filed for bankruptcy), Monster Worldwide, Inc., and Solutia Inc. He has been a director of CMS and Consumers since May 2005.
A Yale-educated attorney, he formerly practiced law with the New York firm of Cravath, Swaine & Moore, LLP, served as a Securities and Exchange Commissioner, was general counsel and senior vice president of Time Inc., and chief administrative officer of Time Warner Inc. His qualifications for service as a director include his experience in governmental affairs, law, compensation, human resources, mergers, acquisitions, and corporate governance. Mr. Lochner also has previously served as a director of Brooklyn Bancorp and American Television and Communications, as a member of the Board of Governors of the American Stock Exchange and the National Association of Securities Dealers, and on the advisory board of Republic N.Y. Corp.
John G. Russell, 56, has served since May 2010 as president and chief executive officer of CMS and president and chief executive officer of Consumers. Prior to that he served from October 2004 to May 2010 as president and chief operating officer of Consumers; he served from December 2001 to July 2004 as executive vice president and president and chief executive officerelectric of Consumers; and from July 2004 to October 2004 as executive vice president and presidentelectric and gas of Consumers. He serves on the board of Hubbell Incorporated. He has been a director of CMS and Consumers since May 2010.
Mr. Russell is qualified to serve on the Boards based on the knowledge and experience acquired throughout his more than 30 years with Consumers. He has in-depth knowledge of all aspects of the utility. His vast experience within the regulated utility industry, hands-on experience and the leadership positions he has held have provided him with a perspective from which the Boards greatly benefit. Mr. Russell holds a bachelor's degree from Michigan State University in business administration. In 1994, he completed the Harvard Business School Program for Management Development. He currently serves on the boards of the American Gas Association, Business Leaders for Michigan, the Edison Electric Institute, and Grand Valley State University. Mr. Russell previously served as a director on the Right Place Inc. and the Michigan Chamber of Commerce.
15
Kenneth L. Way, 74, is the retired chairman of Lear Corporation ("Lear"), a Southfield, Michigan-based supplier of automotive interior systems to the automotive industry. He is a director of Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc. During the past five years, he previously served as a director of Comerica Inc. and WESCO International, Inc. He has been a director of CMS and Consumers since 1998.
In his 38-year career with Lear and its predecessor companies, he held key positions in various engineering, manufacturing, and general management roles. Mr. Way served as chief executive officer of Lear from 1988 to 2000, and as Lear chairman from 1988 through 2002. His extensive background and knowledge in financial matters and investor relations coupled with the governmental, legal and governance expertise he gained over his career, qualify him to serve on the Boards.
Laura H. Wright, 54, founded GSB Advisory LLC, to provide interim executive and financial management to growth and non-profit companies after her retirement in 2012. In September 2012, she retired from Southwest Airlines Co. ("Southwest") as senior vice president of finance and chief financial officer, positions she had held since July 2004. During her 25-year career with Southwest, she held various positions, including vice president of finance and treasurer, treasurer, assistant treasurer and other financial roles. Southwest is based in Dallas, Texas, and is engaged in the operation of passenger airlines that provide scheduled air transportation in the United States. Ms. Wright currently serves as a trustee of Pebblebrook Hotel Trust and as a board member of TE Connectivity Ltd. She has been a director of CMS and Consumers since February 2013.
As an active certified public accountant, the Boards benefit from Ms. Wright's extensive technical expertise and experience in financial accounting and reporting, corporate finance and risk management. She has extensive experience working in a consumer-oriented business environment. Prior to Southwest, Ms. Wright was a manager with Arthur Young & Co. in Dallas. Ms. Wright holds both a bachelor's and a master's degree in accountancy from the University of North Texas and is a member of Financial Executives Institute and the Texas Society of Certified Public Accountants.
John B. Yasinsky, 74, is the retired chairman and chief executive officer of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. ("OMNOVA"), a Fairlawn, Ohio-based developer, manufacturer, and marketer of emulsion polymers, specialty chemicals, and building products. He is a director of TriState Capital Bank and TriState Capital Holding, Inc. He has been a director of A. Schulman, Inc. since 2000. He has been a director of CMS and Consumers since 1994.
A former White House Fellow, Mr. Yasinsky served from 1999 until his retirement in 2000 as chairman and chief executive officer of OMNOVA, and continued as chairman until February 2001. From 1994 to 1999 he was the chairman and chief executive officer of GenCorp; and for three decades prior, worked in various positions for Westinghouse Electric Corporation, including serving as group president. His qualifications to serve on the Boards derive from his prior positions, which provided him with in-depth experience in supplying power systems equipment and services to regulated utilities and in project management for alternative energy technologies such as solar, wind, fuel cells, coal gasification, waste-to-energy, geothermal, nuclear, and waste processing.
YOUR BOARDS RECOMMEND A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH DIRECTOR NOMINEE.
16
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF CMS COMMON STOCK
The following table shows those persons known to us as of March 21, 2014 to be the beneficial owners of 5% or more of CMS Common Stock:
|
|
|
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned with: |
||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(a) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
Percentage of Beneficial Ownership |
Sole Voting Power |
Shared Voting Power |
Sole Investment Power |
Shared Investment Power |
||||||||||||||
BlackRock, Inc. |
21,004,628 | 7.9 | % | 18,557,254 | 0 | 21,004,628 | 0 | ||||||||||||
40 East 52nd Street |
|||||||||||||||||||
The Vanguard Group, Inc. |
18,726,564 |
7.0 |
% |
531,732 |
0 |
18,309,732 |
416,832 |
||||||||||||
100 Vanguard Blvd. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Massachusetts Financial Services Company |
17,383,443 |
6.5 |
% |
15,100,879 |
0 |
17,383,443 |
0 |
||||||||||||
111 Huntington Avenue |
|||||||||||||||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
16,407,399 |
6.1 |
% |
14,999,962 |
262,677 |
16,136,202 |
269,670 |
||||||||||||
270 Park Ave. |
Each of these Schedule 13G/A filings indicates that these shares were acquired in a fiduciary capacity in the ordinary course of business for investment purposes. To the knowledge of our management, no other person or entity currently owns beneficially more than 5% of any class of our outstanding voting securities. The Schedules 13G/A filed by the holders identified above do not identify any shares with respect to which there is a right to acquire beneficial ownership. Except as otherwise noted, the persons named in the table above have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them.
17
The following table shows the beneficial ownership of CMS Common Stock as of March 21, 2014 by the directors and named executive officers of both CMS and Consumers and by all directors and executive officers as a group:
Name
|
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(1) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Jon E. Barfield |
24,365 | |||
Kurt L. Darrow |
1,813 | |||
Stephen E. Ewing |
21,623 | |||
Richard M. Gabrys |
37,144 | |||
William D. Harvey |
6,142 | |||
David W. Joos |
406,614 | |||
Philip R. Lochner, Jr. |
37,144 | |||
Michael T. Monahan |
46,682 | |||
Kenneth L. Way |
48,904 | |||
Laura H. Wright |
6,862 | |||
John B. Yasinsky |
35,955 | |||
John G. Russell |
631,654 | |||
Thomas J. Webb |
285,296 | |||
James E. Brunner |
123,206 | |||
John M. Butler |
109,607 | |||
Daniel J. Malone |
123,282 | |||
David G. Mengebier |
128,154 | |||
All directors and executive officers(2) |
2,431,471 |
18
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of CMS Common Stock to file with the SEC reports of beneficial ownership and changes in such ownership of any of CMS or Consumers equity securities or related derivative securities. To management's knowledge, based upon a review of reports filed with the SEC and representations received from our executive officers and directors, during 2013, CMS and Consumers directors, executive officers and more than 10% beneficial owners made all required Section 16(a) filings on a timely basis.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
In this section, we describe and discuss our executive compensation program, including its objectives and elements, as well as determinations made by the Compensation Committees of the Boards regarding the compensation of our CEO, CFO and the three other most highly compensated executive officers of each of CMS and Consumers, who we collectively refer to as our "named executive officers" ("NEOs"). Included in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis is the following:
Objectives
The objectives of our executive compensation program are to:
The Corporation's 2013 Performance
The Corporation has delivered consistent EPS growth with a three-year average growth rate of 7% and a five-year average growth rate of 7%. As the chart below indicates, the Corporation has also delivered
19
TSR above the median TSR of the Corporation's Performance Peer Group for the three-year and five-year periods ending December 31, 2013.
Total Shareholder Return
CMS vs. Performance Peer Group Median
Based on these achievements, our annual incentive compensation plan paid out at 135% of target and our long-term incentive ("LTI") program paid out at 192% of target for the performance-based portion (161% of target overall for both performance-based and tenure-based awards). The LTI performance-based payout was based on awards granted in 2010, with the payout of such awards determined based on the Corporation's relative TSR performance from August 2010 to August 2013.
Further, the Corporation's 2013 Annual Meeting resulted in an overwhelmingly high level of shareholder support for the shareholder advisory vote to approve executive compensation as described in the 2013 Proxy Statement (approximately 98% of votes cast were in favor of the proposal; up slightly from the 2011 and 2012 advisory votes).
Program Design
We have established our executive compensation program based on balance and simplicity:
We pay an annual incentive only if the Corporation's EPS and operating cash flow performance meet or exceed the threshold levels set in January of each year. EPS and operating cash flow are used to determine the annual incentive payout because the Compensation Committees believe that these two metrics are the building blocks for growing the value of the Corporation and are good indicators of strategy execution. We place more weight on EPS to reflect the Corporation and shareholders' focus on EPS growth. The payout may be increased or reduced by 10% based on the results of the operating
20
metrics under the Consumers' Annual Employee Incentive Compensation Plan ("Consumers Incentive Plan").
Our 2013 LTI program is based primarily on relative TSR because it offers a head-to-head comparison of how well our management team performed compared to other management teams in our industry and further motivates management to increase shareholder value. We do award a portion of equity compensation which vests only on the basis of continued employment (referred to as "tenure" or "tenure-based"). The tenure-based restricted stock helps build executive share ownership and serves as an additional retention mechanism that is not subject to the year-to-year fluctuations of any performance measurement.
Best Practices
We annually review all elements of the Corporation's executive compensation program, and in addition to compliance with required rules, we adopt current best practices where appropriate for our business and shareholders. As a result, we have:
The remainder of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis offers a detailed explanation of our NEO compensation program.
Objectives of Our Executive Compensation Program
The Compensation Committees are responsible for approving the compensation program for our NEOs. The Compensation Committees act pursuant to a charter that is annually reviewed by our Boards and is available on our website.
As mentioned in the Executive Summary section of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the NEO compensation program is organized around four principles:
21
NEO Compensation Should Be Aligned With Increasing Shareholder Value. We believe that a substantial portion of total compensation should be delivered in the form of at risk equity in order to further align the interests of our NEOs with the interests of our shareholders. Equity compensation is provided through the Performance Incentive Stock Plan ("Stock Plan"). In 2013, 75% of equity compensation provided to NEOs was awarded in the form of performance-based restricted stock, which vests if, and only to the extent that, specific TSR goals approved by the Compensation Committees are met over a three-year performance period. The remaining 25% of equity compensation provided to NEOs in 2013 was awarded in the form of tenure-based restricted stock that generally vests on the third anniversary of the award date, subject to the NEO's continued employment with the Corporation.
Our Compensation Program for NEOs Should Enable Us To Compete for and Secure Top Executive Talent. Shareholders are best served when we can attract, retain and motivate talented executives with compensation packages that are competitive and fair. We create a compensation package for NEOs that delivers base salary, annual incentives and long-term incentives targeted at the 50th percentile of the market. For utility specific roles, market is defined by the Compensation Committees' approved 17-company Compensation Peer Group. The Compensation Peer Group consists of energy companies comparable in business focus and size to CMS with which we might compete for executive talent. For general industry roles, size adjusted public utility sector and general industry data are representative of the market. In 2013, the CEO's total direct compensation compared to the median of the Corporation's Compensation Peer Group was as follows:
Company Target Compensation as a Percentage of
Compensation Peer Group Median Target
Principal Position
|
Base Salary | Total Cash Compensation (Base Salary + Target Annual Incentive) |
Target Long-Term Incentive Compensation |
Target Total Direct Compensation |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chief Executive Officer |
2% above peer group | 2% above peer group | 1% below peer group | equivalent to peer group |
Annually, the Compensation Committees engage a consultant to provide advice and information regarding compensation practices of the Compensation Peer Group as well as additional information from published surveys of compensation in the public utility sector and general industry. During the time that Pay Governance has been engaged as the compensation consultant, Pay Governance has not performed any services on behalf of the management of CMS or Consumers or otherwise had a conflict of interest regarding CMS or Consumers.
During the Compensation Committees' review of the CEO's and other officers' compensation levels, the Compensation Committees considered the advice and information received from Pay Governance, the Compensation Committees' independent compensation consultant; however, the Compensation Committees were ultimately responsible for determining the form and amount of executive compensation. The Compensation Committees have specifically directed Pay Governance to obtain the approval of the Compensation Committees before undertaking any activity on behalf of the management of CMS or Consumers.
22
Where available by position, Compensation Peer Group data serves as the primary reference point for pay comparisons of utility specific roles, and broader survey data and published proxy data are also provided by the compensation consultant as a point of reference for utility specific roles and comparisons of general industry roles. Where available by position, Pay Governance gathers compensation data from Towers Watson's Energy Services Executive Database (over 60 investor-owned utilities) and Towers Watson's General Industry Executive Database (approximately 400 participating companies), which it regresses based on CMS' revenues to provide additional market context to the Compensation Peer Group. In selecting members of the Compensation Peer Group, financial and operational characteristics are considered. The criteria for selection of the Compensation Peer Group included comparable revenue, approximately $1.1 billion to $16.5 billion (ranging from approximately one-fifth to two and two thirds times that of CMS), relevant utility industry group, similar business mix (revenue mix between regulated and non-regulated operations) and availability of compensation and financial performance data.
The Compensation Committees determined not to make any changes to the Compensation Peer Group that was used with respect to evaluating 2012 compensation decisions. In 2013, the Compensation Peer Group was composed of the following 17 companies.
Alliant Energy Corporation | Integrys Energy Group, Inc. | Progress Energy, Inc.* | ||
Ameren Corporation | NiSource Inc. | SCANA Corporation | ||
Atmos Energy Corporation | Northeast Utilities* | TECO Energy Inc. | ||
CenterPoint Energy, Inc. | NSTAR* | Wisconsin Energy Corporation | ||
Consolidated Edison, Inc. | OGE Energy Corporation | Xcel Energy Inc. | ||
DTE Energy Company | Pepco Holdings, Inc. |
While the Compensation Peer Group has remained unchanged since 2010, CMS revenues and market capitalization have increased relative to its peers and a number of transactions within the utility sector have occurred, decreasing the number of companies in the group. As such for evaluating 2014 compensation decisions, CMS increased the Compensation Peer Group to 22 companies resulting in a peer group with median revenues better reflecting those of CMS and a more robust competitive comparison by including a larger number of companies. The following additional companies were used to evaluate 2014 compensation pay decisions: Edison International, PPL Corporation, Entergy Corporation, Sempra Energy, Public Service Enterprise Group Inc., Pinnacle West Capital Corporation, and Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.
The Compensation Committees use two different peer groups. The Compensation Committees recognize that there is a difference between the companies against which we compete for executive talent (the Compensation Peer Group) and the companies against which we compete for capital (the Performance Peer Group). For these reasons, the Compensation Committees approved the use of the 2013 peer group for evaluating 2013 NEO compensation decisions and a larger peer group as a reference for TSR performance (the Performance Peer Group). The Performance Peer Group is used to measure TSR for LTI program award vesting determination. The Compensation Committees' rationale for using two peer groups is to ensure appropriate comparative companies relative to the different attributes being evaluated for compensation and TSR purposes. In addition, the larger group for TSR performance ensures better gradation of performance position.
Beginning with the 2012 annual LTI awards, the Compensation Committees expanded the Performance Peer Group to include all of the utility companies contained in both the S&P Midcap 400 and S&P 500
23
indices at the time of the annual LTI award (January of each year). The expansion of the Performance Peer Group was made (a) because CMS had grown in scope (revenue dollars) to be larger than a significant number of the prior performance peer group companies, (b) to improve the ease of comparison by using a defined group rather than custom group and (c) to allow for a more robust comparison by including a larger number of companies.
For awards made in 2013, the Performance Peer Group was composed of the 48 companies set forth below.
AGL Resources Inc. | FirstEnergy Corporation | Pinnacle West Capital Corporation | ||
Alliant Energy Corporation | Great Plains Energy Incorporated | PNM Resources, Inc. | ||
Ameren Corporation | Hawaiian Electric Industries Inc. | PPL Corporation | ||
American Electric Power Company, Inc. | IdaCorp, Inc. | Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated | ||
Aqua America Inc. | Integrys Energy Group, Inc. | Questar Corporation | ||
Atmos Energy Corporation | MDU Resources Group Inc. | SCANA Corporation | ||
Black Hills Corporation | National Fuel Gas Company | Sempra Energy | ||
CenterPoint Energy, Inc. | NextEra Energy, Inc. | The Southern Company | ||
Cleco Corporation | NiSource Inc. | TECO Energy Inc. | ||
Consolidated Edison Inc. | Northeast Utilities | The AES Corporation | ||
Dominion Resources, Inc. | NRG Energy, Inc. | UGI Corporation | ||
DTE Energy Company | NV Energy, Inc.* | Vectren Corporation | ||
Duke Energy Corporation | OGE Energy Corporation | Westar Energy, Inc. | ||
Edison International | ONEOK Inc. | WGL Holdings Inc. | ||
Entergy Corporation | Pepco Holdings, Inc. | Wisconsin Energy Corporation | ||
Exelon Corporation* | PG&E Corporation | Xcel Energy Inc. |
NEO Compensation Should Reward Measurable Results. Base salary is reviewed annually and may be adjusted based on a variety of factors including each NEO's overall performance and tenure. The CEO provides to the Compensation Committees a recommendation of annual base salary adjustments and annual restricted stock awards for all officers, other than the CEO. The Compensation Committees take the CEO's recommendations, along with information provided by the compensation consultant (Compensation Peer Group and other market data from surveys) into consideration when making adjustments. CEO base salary is determined solely by the Compensation Committees based on market and Compensation Peer Group data and overall Corporation and CEO performance. Annual incentives, the other form of cash compensation, provide for award opportunities to each NEO under the CMS Incentive Compensation Plan for CMS and Consumers Officers (the "Annual Incentive Plan"). The Annual Incentive Plan pays incentives on the basis of performance over a one-year period. Performance objectives under the Annual Incentive Plan are developed each year through an iterative process. Management, including executive officers, develops preliminary recommendations for the Compensation Committees' review. The Compensation Committees review management's preliminary recommendations and establish final goals. For 2013, the Annual Incentive Plan targeted awards at 55% to 100% of each NEO's base salary, but actual awards could range from zero to two times the target level depending on performance against specific targets. Incentives under the Annual Incentive Plan are paid if, and to the extent that, corporate goals, approved by the Compensation Committees, are attained. The majority of equity compensation is also designed to reward measurable results and is based on a comparison of the Corporation's TSR performance to the TSR performance of the Performance Peer Group. For 2013, 75% of the equity compensation granted to the NEOs was performance-based.
The table below illustrates the manner in which: (a) the overall mix of total compensation was allocated between performance and non-performance-based elements for each NEO; (b) performance-based compensation was allocated between annual and long-term elements; and (c) total compensation was allocated between cash and equity.
24
2013 Total Compensation Mix Table(1)
|
Percent of Total Compensation That is: |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Performance/ Stock Based Total Compensation That is: |
Percent of Total Compensation That is: |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Performance/ Stock Based(2) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed(3) | Annual(4) | Long-Term(5) | Cash-Based(6) | Equity-Based(7) | ||||||||||||||
John G. Russell |
79 | % | 21 | % | 26 | % | 74 | % | 41 | % | 59 | % | |||||||
Thomas J. Webb |
65 | % | 35 | % | 33 | % | 67 | % | 56 | % | 44 | % | |||||||
James E. Brunner |
68 | % | 32 | % | 28 | % | 72 | % | 51 | % | 49 | % | |||||||
Daniel J. Malone |
68 | % | 32 | % | 28 | % | 72 | % | 51 | % | 49 | % | |||||||
John M. Butler |
66 | % | 34 | % | 31 | % | 69 | % | 55 | % | 45 | % | |||||||
David G. Mengebier |
60 | % | 40 | % | 36 | % | 64 | % | 62 | % | 38 | % |
Our Compensation Program Should Be Fair and Competitive. We strive to create a compensation program that will be perceived as fair, both internally and externally. This is accomplished by evaluating each NEO's individual performance and by comparing the compensation that is provided to our NEOs to:
Use of Tally Sheets. At least annually, the Compensation Committees review tally sheets for each of the NEOs. These tally sheets reflect all components of compensation, including base salary, short-term (annual) and long-term incentive compensation, retirement benefits, deferred compensation benefits, death benefits, and benefits or payments that would be payable in connection with a termination of employment or change-in-control. Tally sheets are provided to the Compensation Committees to show how various compensation and benefit amounts are interrelated and how a change in one component of compensation impacts other components and to enable the Compensation Committees to quantify amounts payable upon various termination scenarios.
The overall purpose of these tally sheets is to consolidate all of the elements of actual and potential future compensation of our NEOs, as well as information about wealth accumulation, so that an analysis can be made of both the individual elements of compensation (including the compensation mix) as well as the aggregate total amount of actual and projected compensation. Tally sheet information is used in various aspects of the analysis and compensation decision-making process including consideration of the management team's internal pay equity.
25
The Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program
This section describes the various elements of our compensation program for NEOs, together with a discussion of various matters relating to those items, including why we chose to include the items in the compensation program.
Cash Compensation
Cash compensation is paid in the form of base salary and annual incentive. Our 2013 compensation program for NEOs was designed so that, subject to performance, the percentage of cash compensation paid to our NEOs is comparable to that paid to NEOs of the Compensation Peer Group. That strategy resulted in cash payments (as a percentage of total compensation) representing approximately 41% for the CEO and 51% to 62% for the other NEOs. The components making up the cash portion of total compensation are described in more detail below.
Base Salary. Base salary is included in the NEO's annual compensation package because we believe it is appropriate that some portion of NEO compensation be provided in a form that is fixed and liquid. Each January, the Compensation Committees determine the NEO base salary. Changes in base salary on a year-over-year basis are primarily dependent on comparison to market data and past performance and expected future contributions of each individual. The annual increases in base salaries for NEOs in 2013 were as follows: Mr. Russell 2.9%; Mr. Webb 1.5%; Mr. Brunner 0%; Mr. Malone 5.3%; Mr. Butler 5%; and Mr. Mengebier 4.3%. Mr. Brunner's base salary was not increased in 2013 as his base salary level was viewed as competitive based on the objectives detailed in Our Compensation Program for NEOs Should Enable Us to Compete for and Secure Top Executive Talent section of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
Annual Incentive Plan. Performance-based incentives are included as an element of compensation because they permit us to provide an incentive to our NEOs to accomplish specific annual goals that represent performance priorities for CMS and provide additional cash compensation only if performance goals are achieved. Generally, the threshold, target and maximum performance goals are set such that the relative difficulty in achieving the target level is consistent from year to year. For 2013, the Annual Incentive Plan was based on our success in meeting established "Plan EPS" (Earnings Per Share as defined by the Annual Incentive Plan) and "Operating Cash Flow" (as defined by the Annual Incentive Plan) goals described later in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The Annual Incentive Plan provides cash compensation to NEOs only if, and to the extent that, performance goals approved in January of the performance year by the Compensation Committees are met. Under the Annual Incentive Plan, which is intended to meet the requirements of IRC Section 162(m), the maximum amount that can be awarded to any one person is $2.5 million in any one performance year; however, this amount is not reachable by the current payout formulas established for each executive.
The Annual Incentive Plan allows the Compensation Committees to exercise "negative discretion" to reduce or eliminate payouts under the Annual Incentive Plan, but does not allow discretion to increase payouts. The Compensation Committees did not exercise negative discretion in 2013.
Target incentives under the Annual Incentive Plan were approved in January 2013 by the Compensation Committees. In determining the amount of target incentives under the Annual Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committees considered the following factors:
26
Actual payments under the Annual Incentive Plan can range, on the basis of performance, from 15% (threshold) to 200% (maximum) of the target incentive. In addition, under the parameters for the 2013 Annual Incentive Plan, there is a minimum payout if either a threshold Plan EPS performance goal of $0.10 less than target is achieved or a threshold Operating Cash Flow performance goal of $100 million less than target is achieved and there is a maximum payout if Plan EPS performance of $0.20 more than target is achieved and Operating Cash Flow performance of $200 million more than target is achieved.
Under the 2013 Annual Incentive Plan, the annual award will be reduced by 10% if there is no award earned under the operational metrics of the Consumers Incentive Plan and the award will be increased by 10% (but in no event shall the award exceed the maximum of the target annual incentive) if the maximum payout is achieved under the operational metrics of the Consumers Incentive Plan (potential adjustment referred to as "Consumers Incentive Plan modifier"). This potential adjustment provides linkage of executive compensation with the Corporation's performance goals related to safety, reliability and customer value. No adjustments to the 2013 Annual Incentive Plan were made as the Consumers Incentive Plan achieved 8 of the 11 operational goals which does not result in the maximum payout being achieved.
Plan Performance Factor. We refer to Plan EPS and Operating Cash Flow performance under the Annual Incentive Plan as the "Plan Performance Factor." Under the Annual Incentive Plan, Plan EPS means EPS as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices, excluding asset sales, changes in accounting principles from those used in the budget, large restructuring and severance expenses greater than $5 million, legal and settlement costs or gains related to previously sold assets, and regulatory recovery for prior year changes. Under the Annual Incentive Plan, Operating Cash Flow means generally accepted accounting principles operating cash flow with adjustments to include changes in power supply cost recovery from budget (disallowances excluded), changes in pension contribution, and gas-price changes (favorable or unfavorable) related to gas cost recovery in January and February of the following performance year. For 2013, Plan EPS performance constituted 70% of the Plan Performance Factor and Operating Cash Flow performance constituted the remaining 30% of the Plan Performance Factor. The Compensation Committees believe that the allocation between EPS and Operating Cash Flow performance aligns our performance objectives with our Peer Group and the Corporation's utility-focused strategy.
Actual 2013 Plan EPS was $1.66, which exceeded the target of $1.63, resulting in achievement of 102% of target and a 115% payout for this metric. Operating Cash Flow was $1,512 million, which was above the target of $1,350 million, resulting in achievement of 112% of target and a 181% payout for this metric. The 2013 Plan Performance Factor, reflecting achievement levels of both of these performance goals, resulted in a 135% award level payout. Annual Award Formula. Annual awards for each eligible officer are based upon a standard award percentage of the officer's base salary for the performance year and are calculated and made as follows:
Individual Award = Base Salary X Standard Award Percentage X Plan Performance Factor X Consumers Incentive Plan modifier.
The Standard Award Percentages for officers are determined annually by the Compensation Committees as discussed above. For 2013, there were no increases to the Standard Award Percentages for NEOs. Standard Award Percentages of base salary for NEOs in 2013 were as follows:
John G. Russell |
100 | % | ||
Thomas J. Webb |
60 | % | ||
James E. Brunner |
60 | % | ||
Daniel J. Malone |
60 | % | ||
John M. Butler |
60 | % | ||
David G. Mengebier |
55 | % |
27
Equity Compensation
We have generally followed a practice of making all equity awards to our officers on a single date each year. We do not have any program, plan or practice to time annual equity awards to our executives in coordination with the release of material non-public information. In 2013, equity awards were made in January and are planned to be made in January on an on-going basis. This enables the Compensation Committees to review total compensation holistically at one time and adjust the levels of various compensation elements and compensation mix as necessary for each individual.
Stock Plan. As previously indicated, we provide a substantial portion of NEO compensation in the form of equity awards because we believe that such awards serve to align the interests of NEOs and our shareholders. Equity awards to our NEOs are made pursuant to our Stock Plan, which was re-approved by shareholders in 2009. The Stock Plan permits awards in the form of stock options, incentive options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, phantom shares and performance units.
Award of Restricted Stock. At the present time, we believe that performance-based restricted stock is an effective form of equity compensation because of the alignment it creates with shareholders. After the vesting, there is no holding period requirement as long as specific stock ownership guidelines (see Corporate Governance as it relates to executive compensation, Stock Ownership Guidelines, below) have been met by the NEO. The Stock Plan also contains a clawback provision as described in Corporate Governance, as it relates to executive compensation, Clawback Provisions, below.
Since 2011, three-quarters of the restricted stock awards have been delivered as performance-based and one-quarter as tenure-based, to deliver a substantial portion of each NEO's compensation in the form of at-risk compensation. The performance criteria for the performance-based restricted stock awards is a comparison of the TSR performance of the Corporation to the TSR performance of the Performance Peer Group utilizing the following relative TSR pay/performance schedule:
Achievement Level
|
Relative to Performance Peer Group |
Award Level | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minimum |
30th Percentile | 50 | % | |||
Target |
Median | 100 | % | |||
70th Percentile |
70th Percentile | 150 | % | |||
Maximum |
90th Percentile | 200 | % |
If CMS' TSR is less than 0% for the three-year period, the total payout for the three-year period cannot exceed 100% of the total award based on relative TSR to the Performance Peer Group. The 20-day stock price averages preceding and including the award date and preceding and including the three-year anniversary of the award date are used to determine the relative TSR. The 2013 tenure-based awards vest if the NEO remains employed by the Corporation on the three-year anniversary of the date of the award, subject to prorated vesting upon an earlier retirement or termination due to disability.
In 2013, the performance-based restricted stock awards granted in 2010 completed the three-year performance period. Our TSR for that three-year period (from August 2010 to August 2013) was 93% while the median TSR for our performance peer group was 58%, placing CMS at the 87th percentile compared to the Performance Peer Group. This resulted in the performance-based restricted stock vesting at 192% of target.
In determining the amount of equity compensation that is provided to each NEO in a given year we consider factors such as retention and incentive practices and the relative percentages of cash and equity paid by the Compensation Peer Group and other market data. The Compensation Committees receive restricted stock award recommendations from the CEO for NEOs other than the CEO based upon these factors, which the Compensation Committees review and approve or modify. CEO restricted stock awards are determined based principally on overall CEO performance and Compensation Peer Group data. Mr. Russell's 2013 restricted stock award increased compared to his 2012 restricted stock award to better align his equity award with the market.
28
Effective with the 2014 performance-based restricted stock awards, adjusted relative EPS growth will be added as a second performance metric. The 2014 LTI mix equals 25% tenure-based and 75% performance-based (37.5% relative TSR and 37.5% adjusted relative EPS growth).
Practices Regarding the Grant of Options. There have been no stock option grants since August 2003 and there are no outstanding options. The Compensation Committees periodically consider the use of stock options as part of the current compensation package for officers but have determined not to include stock options for LTI at this time.
Perquisites
As part of our competitive compensation plan, our NEOs are eligible for limited perquisites provided by or paid for by us, which include an annual mandatory executive physical examination, executive survivor benefits and relocation expenses. Perquisites provided to our NEOs are reviewed on a regular basis. In 2013, we paid no relocation expenses to NEOs.
Physical Examination. The annual mandatory physical examinations for all NEOs are at a facility of CMS' choosing and at CMS' expense. The physical is required because the Compensation Committees believe that it is an effective method of protecting the NEOs and the Corporation from preventable health-related disruptions.
Retired Executive Survivor Benefit. The retired executive survivor benefit plan provides a survivor benefit after retirement for certain employees who held high-level management or executive positions prior to their retirement. This self-funded plan is a supplement to the retired employees group term life insurance plan. For additional information regarding the retired executive survivor benefit, see Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control, below.
Post-Termination Compensation
Severance and Change-in-Control Benefits. Our NEOs are eligible to receive severance payments and other benefits if the officer's employment terminates for a qualifying event or circumstance as well as change-in-control benefits upon a qualifying event or circumstance after there has been a change-in-control of CMS. For additional information regarding severance and change-in-control benefits, including a definition of key terms and a quantification of benefits that would have been received by our NEOs had termination or change-in-control occurred on December 31, 2013, see Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control, below.
We believe that these severance and change-in-control arrangements are an important part of our executive compensation program and will help to secure the continued employment and dedication of our NEOs, notwithstanding any concern they may have regarding their own continued employment, prior to or following a change-in-control. These agreements are useful for recruitment and retention, as nearly all members of the Compensation Peer Group have comparable agreements in place for their senior employees.
Deferred Compensation Plans
We have two deferred compensation plans that allow certain employees, including our NEOs, to defer receipt of base salary and/or incentive payments: Deferred Salary Savings Plan ("DSSP") and the Annual Incentive Plan. The Annual Incentive Plan allows for deferral of up to 100% of the annual incentive award. CMS does not match incentive amounts that are deferred pursuant to the Annual Incentive Plan. Participants have only an unsecured contractual commitment from us to pay the amounts due under both the DSSP and the Annual Incentive Plan. None of the NEOs elected to defer their 2013 annual incentive. For additional information regarding the DSSP, see DSSP, under the Narrative to 2013 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table, below.
29
We offer these plans to permit highly taxed employees (at their discretion) to defer the obligation to pay taxes on certain elements of compensation that they are entitled to receive. The provisions of the DSSP and the Annual Incentive Plan permit them to do this while also receiving investment returns on deferred amounts. We believe that provision of these benefits is useful as a retention and recruitment tool as many of the Compensation Peer Group companies provide similar plans to their senior employees.
Tax-Qualified Pension and Retirement Plans
The Corporation sponsors tax-qualified pension and retirement savings plans that cover a broad group of employees.
Consumers Pension Plan. The Consumers Pension Plan (the "Pension Plan") is a funded, tax-qualified, noncontributory defined-benefit pension plan that covers certain employees hired before July 1, 2003. All of the NEOs except for Mr. Butler, who was hired after June 30, 2003, participate in the Pension Plan. Mr. Malone qualifies for the Pension Plan based on his years of service prior to being rehired on August 14, 2006. For additional information regarding the Pension Plan, see Pension Plan, under the Narrative to 2013 Pension Benefits and DB SERP Table, below.
Defined Company Contribution Plan. Salaried employees, including NEOs, hired after June 30, 2003 are not eligible to participate in the Pension Plan and are instead eligible to participate in the Defined Company Contribution Plan ("DCCP"). CMS provides a contribution equal to 6% of regular compensation to the DCCP on behalf of the employee that vests immediately and is payable upon termination of employment. Mr. Butler is the only NEO covered under the DCCP. For additional information regarding the DCCP, see DCCP, under the Narrative to 2013 All Other Compensation Table, below.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans ("SERP")
The Corporation maintains two supplemental executive retirement plans that allow certain employees, including eligible NEOs, to receive benefits in excess of the benefits that would be payable under the Pension Plan and DCCP.
Defined Benefit SERP. The Defined Benefit SERP (the "DB SERP") is an unfunded plan, which provides out of our general assets an amount substantially equal to the difference between the amount that would have been payable under the Pension Plan and the amount actually payable under the Pension Plan. Any employee, including NEOs, who was hired or promoted to an eligible position after March 31, 2006, is not eligible to participate in the DB SERP. Each of the NEOs except for Mr. Butler, who was hired after March 31, 2006, and Mr. Malone, who was rehired after March 31, 2006, participate in the DB SERP. For additional information regarding the DB SERP, see DB SERP, under the Narrative to 2013 Pension Benefits and DB SERP Table, below.
Defined Contribution SERP. The Corporation established a defined contribution SERP ("DC SERP") for employees not eligible to participate in the DB SERP. The DC SERP is a nonqualified tax deferred defined contribution plan. For additional information regarding the DC SERP, see DC SERP, under the Narrative to 2013 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table, below.
We believe that our pension and retirement plans and the SERPs are a useful part of the NEO compensation program and assist in the retention of our senior executives, as benefits thereunder increase for each year that these executives remain employed by us and continue their work on behalf of our shareholders. We have considered the issue of potential overlap between the two long-term focused plans (SERPs and equity compensation) and concluded that both are appropriate elements. The SERPs are designed to provide a predictable retirement income, and the equity plan is designed to align the interests of NEOs with our shareholders and is performance-based and variable. Further, both are market practice and supportive of the philosophy to provide a competitive NEO compensation program.
30
Employees' Savings Plans
Under the Employees' Savings Plan for Consumers and affiliated companies, a tax-qualified defined contribution retirement savings plan (the "Savings Plan"), participating employees, including NEOs, may contribute a percentage of their regular earnings into their Savings Plan accounts. For additional information regarding the Savings Plan, see Savings Plan, under the Narrative to 2013 All Other Compensation Table, below.
We maintain the Savings Plan for our employees, including our NEOs, because we wish to encourage our employees to save some percentage of their cash compensation for their eventual retirement. The Savings Plan permits employees to make such savings in a manner that is relatively tax-efficient.
Corporate Governance as it Relates to Executive Compensation
Stock Ownership Guidelines
We have established stock ownership guidelines for our officers. These guidelines require our officers to maintain or establish an equity stake in CMS and thereby more closely link their interests with those of our shareholders. These stock ownership guidelines provide that, within five years of becoming an officer or promotion to a higher ownership requirement, each officer must own shares of our Common Stock with a value of one to five times their base salary, depending on his or her position. Shares of performance-based restricted stock are not counted toward our stock ownership guidelines.
The following table illustrates the required NEO stock ownership guidelines:
John G. Russell |
5 X base salary | |
Thomas J. Webb |
3 X base salary | |
James E. Brunner |
3 X base salary | |
Daniel J. Malone |
2 X base salary | |
John M. Butler |
2 X base salary | |
David G. Mengebier |
2 X base salary |
All NEOs met these guidelines as of December 31, 2013. Failure of an officer to comply with the guidelines shall result in the following:
No Pledging or Hedging of Stock
We prohibit our officers and directors from pledging or purchasing on margin our Common Stock, engaging in selling short our Common Stock or engaging in hedging or offsetting transactions regarding our Common Stock.
Clawback Provisions
The Compensation Committees have approved "clawback" provisions for certain compensation and benefit plans. These provisions provide the Compensation Committees the discretion to require the
31
forfeiture and return of past benefits or awards if there is a restatement of financial results. The Compensation Committees may also, at their discretion, require a return of a benefit or award in the event of a mistake or accounting error in the calculation of such benefit or award.
Shareholder's Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation
As part of the Compensation Committees' on-going review of executive compensation, we considered the affirmative 2013 shareholder advisory vote (approximately 98% of the votes cast) to approve executive compensation as described in the 2013 Proxy Statement and determined that the current philosophy, objectives and compensation elements continue to be appropriate. As such, the Compensation Committee did not make any changes to our executive compensation programs in response to the 2013 shareholder vote. Despite the overwhelmingly high level of shareholder support, we continue to monitor best practices and emerging trends and engage with our large institutional holders regarding compensation elements. In response to the shareholder advisory vote for an annual frequency (87.9% of votes cast) from the Corporation's 2011 Annual Meeting, the Boards approved and adopted an annual frequency (one year) for future advisory votes by shareholders to approve executive compensation.
IRC Section 162(m) limits the tax deductibility of compensation in excess of $1 million paid to a corporation's CEO and to the other three highest compensated executive officers (other than the CFO) unless such compensation qualifies as performance-based and is approved by shareholders of the Corporation. The Annual Incentive Plan awards and performance-based restricted stock are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation. Because the Compensation Committees also recognize the need to retain flexibility to make compensation decisions that may not meet the standards of Section 162(m), the Compensation Committees may approve nondeductible compensation if necessary or desirable to achieve the goals of our compensation philosophy.
COMPENSATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEES REPORT
The Compensation Committees of the Boards of Directors of CMS and Consumers (the "Boards") oversee CMS' and Consumers' compensation program on behalf of the Boards. In fulfilling their oversight responsibilities, the Compensation Committees reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth in this Proxy Statement.
In reliance on the review and discussions referred to above, the Compensation Committees recommended to the Boards that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in CMS' and Consumers' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, CMS' Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A relating to CMS' 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Consumers' Information Statement on Schedule 14C, each of which will be or has been filed with the SEC.
COMPENSATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEES
John
B. Yasinsky (Chair)
Kurt L. Darrow*
Stephen E. Ewing
William D. Harvey
Kenneth L. Way
32
The following table contains compensation information for our NEOs for the last three fiscal years.
2013 Summary Compensation Table
Name and Principal Position
|
Year | Salary ($) |
Stock Awards(1) ($) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(2) ($) |
Change in Pension Value & Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings(3) ($) |
All Other Compensation(4) ($) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) |
(b) |
(c) |
(d) |
(e) |
(f) |
(g) |
(h) |
|||||||||||||||
John G. Russell |
2013 | 1,075,000 | 3,089,631 | 1,451,250 | 1,157,575 | 43,551 | 6,817,007 | |||||||||||||||
President and CEO, CMS and |
2012 | 1,045,000 | 2,952,106 | 1,097,250 | 3,166,177 | 13,578 | 8,274,111 | |||||||||||||||
Consumers |
2011 | 950,000 | 2,610,452 | 1,149,500 | 1,962,905 | 44,035 | 6,716,892 | |||||||||||||||
Thomas J. Webb |
2013 |
685,000 |
854,024 |
554,850 |
16,671 |
29,511 |
2,140,056 |
|||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and |
2012 | 675,000 | 874,227 | 425,250 | 1,342,570 | 28,878 | 3,345,925 | |||||||||||||||
CFO, CMS & Consumers |
2011 | 675,000 | 816,298 | 490,050 | 1,198,309 | 38,173 | 3,217,830 | |||||||||||||||
James E. Brunner |
2013 |
433,000 |
668,147 |
350,730 |
|
19,473 |
1,471,350 |
|||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President, CMS & |
2012 | 433,000 | 692,983 | 272,790 | 1,033,982 | 19,326 | 2,452,081 | |||||||||||||||
Consumers |
2011 | 433,000 | 665,432 | 314,358 | 971,400 | 29,491 | 2,413,681 | |||||||||||||||
Daniel J. Malone |
2013 |
395,000 |
602,869 |
319,950 |
13,582 |
68,323 |
1,399,724 |
|||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President, |
2012 | 375,000 | 586,379 | 236,250 | 140,447 | 64,656 | 1,402,732 | |||||||||||||||
Consumers |
2011 | 340,000 | 550,512 | 226,270 | 139,762 | 47,718 | 1,304,262 | |||||||||||||||
John M. Butler |
2013 |
420,000 |
552,602 |
340,200 |
|
88,700 |
1,401,502 |
|||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President, CMS & |
2012 | 400,000 | 533,051 | 252,000 | | 85,341 | 1,270,392 | |||||||||||||||
Consumers |
2011 | 373,000 | 490,990 | 248,232 | | 88,798 | 1,201,020 | |||||||||||||||
David G. Mengebier |
2013 |
365,000 |
351,663 |
271,013 |
|
16,743 |
1,004,419 |
|||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President, CMS & |
2012 | 350,000 | 346,479 | 202,125 | 721,084 | 16,038 | 1,635,726 | |||||||||||||||
Consumers |
2011 | 342,000 | 336,000 | 227,601 | 511,013 | 21,402 | 1,438,016 |
33
Narrative to 2013 Summary Compensation Table
Employment Agreements
During 2013, none of the NEOs were employed pursuant to a traditional employment agreement with CMS or Consumers. Messrs. Russell, Webb and Mengebier have each entered into an Executive Severance Agreement that also contains change-in-control provisions and Messrs. Brunner, Butler and Malone have each entered into a Change-in-Control Agreement and an Officer Separation Agreement. Please see Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control, below, for a description of such agreements.
Restricted Stock Awards
Please see Compensation Discussion and Analysis, The Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program, Equity Compensation, above for a description of the Stock Plan, pursuant to which restricted stock is awarded.
Cash Incentives
In 2013, the Compensation Committees established potential cash incentives for each of our NEOs under the Annual Incentive Plan. The amount of the potential incentive was tied to satisfaction of Plan EPS and Operating Cash Flow targets approved by the Compensation Committees. The Annual Incentive Plan incentives were earned by the NEOs at 102% of the target level for Plan EPS and at 112% of the target level for Operating Cash Flow for a combined total payout of 135% of the target level and are reported as "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" in the 2013 Summary Compensation Table. Please see Compensation Discussion and Analysis, The Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program, Cash Compensation, above for a description of the Annual Incentive Plan.
Salary and Incentive in Proportion to Total Compensation as Defined by the 2013 Summary Compensation Table
Our NEOs generally receive from 41% to 62% of their compensation in the form of base salary and cash incentive awards under our Annual Incentive Plan. As noted in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we believe that a substantial portion of each NEO's compensation should be in the form of equity awards. We believe that our current compensation program gives our NEOs substantial alignment with shareholders, while also permitting us to provide incentive to the NEOs to pursue specific short- and long-term performance goals. Please see Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Objectives of Our Executive Compensation Program, above for a description of the objectives of our compensation program and overall compensation philosophy.
2013 All Other Compensation Table
We provide our NEOs with additional benefits that we believe are reasonable, competitive and consistent with the Corporation's overall executive compensation program. The following table contains information regarding these other benefits for 2013.
34
2013 All Other Compensation Table
Name
|
Registrant Contributions to Employees' Savings Plan and DCCP ($) |
Registrant Contributions to Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans(1) ($) |
Life Insurance Premium ($) |
Other(5) ($) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
John G. Russell |
9,180 | 29,520 | 2,760 | 2,091 | 43,551 | |||||||||||
Thomas J. Webb |
9,180 | 15,480 | 2,760 | 2,091 | 29,511 | |||||||||||
James E. Brunner |
9,180 | 6,408 | 1,794 | 2,091 | 19,473 | |||||||||||
Daniel J. Malone |
9,180 | 55,415 | (3) | 1,637 | 2,091 | 68,323 | ||||||||||
John M. Butler |
24,480 | (2) | 60,390 | (4) | 1,739 | 2,091 | 88,700 | |||||||||
David G. Mengebier |
9,180 | 3,960 | 1,512 | 2,091 | 16,743 |
Narrative to 2013 All Other Compensation Table
DCCP
Salaried employees, including NEOs, hired after June 30, 2003 are not eligible to participate in the Pension Plan and instead are eligible to participate in the DCCP. Under the DCCP, CMS provides a contribution equal to 6% of regular compensation, up to the IRC compensation limit ($255,000 for 2013), to the DCCP on behalf of the employee which vests immediately and is payable upon termination of employment. Mr. Butler is the only NEO covered under the DCCP.
Savings Plan
Under the Savings Plan for Consumers and affiliated companies, participating employees may contribute a percentage of their regular earnings into their Savings Plan accounts. NEOs, because they are considered highly compensated, may only contribute up to 20%, subject to the IRC annual dollar limit. In addition, under the Savings Plan, we match an amount equal to 60% of the first 6% of employees' regular earnings contributions. The matching contribution is allocated among the participant employees' investment choices. As explained above, participants in our DCCP receive an employer contribution of 6% of regular earnings to their Savings Plan. Amounts held in Savings Plan accounts may not be withdrawn prior to the employee's termination of employment, or such earlier time as the employee reaches the age of 591/2, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the IRC regulations.
35
The following table summarizes non-equity and equity awards made to our NEOs during 2013.
2013 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) |
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) |
All Other Stock Awards Number of Shares of Stock(3) (#) |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards(4) ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Grant Date |
Threshold ($) |
Target ($) |
Maximum ($) |
Threshold (#) |
Target (#) |
Maximum (#) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
(a) |
(b) |
(c) |
(d) |
(e) |
(f) |
(g) |
(h) |
(i) |
(j) |
|||||||||||||||||||
John G. Russell |
01/24/13 | | | | 45,615 | 91,229 | 182,458 | | 2,320,866 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
01/24/13 | | | | | | | 30,410 | 768,765 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| 161,250 | 1,075,000 | 2,150,000 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Thomas J. Webb |
01/24/13 |
|
|
|
12,609 |
25,217 |
50,434 |
|
641,520 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
01/24/13 | | | | | | | 8,406 | 212,504 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| 61,650 | 411,000 | 822,000 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
James E. Brunner |
01/24/13 |
|
|
|
9,865 |
19,729 |
39,458 |
|
501,906 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
01/24/13 | | | | | | | 6,576 | 166,241 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| 38,970 | 259,800 | 519,600 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Daniel J. Malone |
01/24/13 |
|
|
|
8,901 |
17,801 |
35,602 |
|
452,857 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
01/24/13 | | | | | | | 5,934 | 150,012 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| 35,500 | 237,000 | 474,000 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
John M. Butler |
01/24/13 |
|
|
|
8,159 |
16,317 |
32,634 |
|
415,104 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
01/24/13 | | | | | | | 5,439 | 137,498 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| 37,800 | 252,000 | 504,000 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
David G. Mengebier |
01/24/13 |
|
|
|
5,192 |
10,384 |
20,768 |
|
264,169 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
01/24/13 | | | | | | | 3,461 | 87,494 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| 30,113 | 200,750 | 401,500 | | | | | |
36
The following table provides information regarding unvested restricted stock awards for each of the NEOs at December 31, 2013.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2013 Table
Name
|
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(1) (#) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(2) ($) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested(1)(3) (#) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested(2)(3) ($) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) |
(e) |
(f) |
(g) |
(h) |
|||||||||
John G. Russell |
92,139 | 2,466,561 | 599,140 | 16,038,977 | |||||||||
Thomas J. Webb |
27,195 | 728,010 | 177,135 | 4,741,914 | |||||||||
James E. Brunner |
21,660 | 579,838 | 141,387 | 3,784,919 | |||||||||
Daniel J. Malone |
18,597 | 497,842 | 120,842 | 3,234,939 | |||||||||
John M. Butler |
16,842 | 450,860 | 109,373 | 2,927,918 | |||||||||
David G. Mengebier |
11,003 | 294,550 | 72,110 | 1,930,390 |
For performance-based restricted stock awards, in lieu of dividends, recipients receive additional performance-based shares of restricted stock that will vest/forfeit based on the CMS TSR performance and are included above.
37
The following table provides information concerning the vesting of stock during 2013 for each NEO.
Name
|
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) |
Value Realized On Vesting(1) ($) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) |
(b) |
(c) |
|||||
John G. Russell |
222,928 | 6,357,900 | |||||
Thomas J. Webb |
72,519 | 2,068,233 | |||||
James E. Brunner |
64,142 | 1,829,344 | |||||
Daniel J. Malone |
38,995 | 1,112,145 | |||||
John M. Butler |
36,209 | 1,032,690 | |||||
David G. Mengebier |
33,523 | 956,089 |
The following table provides information concerning defined benefit plans as of December 31, 2013 for each NEO.
2013 Pension Benefits and DB SERP Table
Name
|
Plan Name | Number of Years Credited Service(1) (#) |
Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) |
(b) |
(c) |
(d) |
||||||
John G. Russell |
Pension Plan | 32.00 | 1,231,153 | ||||||
|
DB SERP | 33.17 | 9,008,972 | ||||||
Thomas J. Webb |
Pension Plan | 11.55 | 631,644 | ||||||
|
DB SERP | 21.55 | 5,759,015 | ||||||
James E. Brunner |
Pension Plan | 35.00 | 1,768,298 | ||||||
|
DB SERP | 35.00 | 4,083,255 | ||||||
Daniel J. Malone(2) |
Pension Plan | 24.77 | 607,035 | ||||||
|
DB SERP | N/A | N/A | ||||||
John M. Butler(2) |
Pension Plan | N/A | N/A | ||||||
|
DB SERP | N/A | N/A | ||||||
David G. Mengebier |
Pension Plan | 23.00 | 943,325 | ||||||
|
DB SERP | 30.72 | 2,133,243 |
38
augmentation attributable to the preference service under the DB SERP is as follows: Mr. Russell $319,464; Mr. Webb $2,944,101; and Mr. Mengebier $685,384.
Narrative to 2013 Pension Benefits and DB SERP Table
Pension Plan
The Pension Plan is a funded, tax-qualified, noncontributory defined benefit pension plan. Benefits under the Pension Plan are based on the employee's years of service, age at retirement and the sum of the five highest calendar years of base salary while employed with us and our affiliated companies divided by 60. Base salary excludes overtime pay and incentive and does not exceed the IRC compensation limit for a qualified pension plan. Benefits are payable after retirement in the form of an annuity or a lump sum. The standard form of benefit is a life annuity for an unmarried employee and a 50% joint and survivor annuity for a married employee, with additional forms of joint and survivor annuities available under the plan. The benefit formula is equal to 2.1% for the first 20 years of service and 1.7% for the next 15 years of service, to a maximum percentage of 67.5% for 35 years of service reduced by a Social Security adjustment equal to 0.5% multiplied by 1/12th of the average of the participant's three most recent years of compensation, up to the maximum Social Security covered compensation for each year of service counted in the formula. To the extent an employee exceeds 35 years of service under the Pension Plan, an additional $20 per month is added to the annuity after the adjustment for Social Security for each full year of service above 35. In accordance with SEC guidelines, the present value information contained in this report is based on Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Codification Topic ASC 715, Plan Accounting-Defined Benefit Plans (ASC 715) assumptions and is applied using the age at which a benefit is unreduced. Early retirement subsidies provided by the benefit formula of the Pension Plan and the actual discount rate required by the U.S. Department of Treasury may provide a greater present value to a participant retiring on or after age 55 but prior to the age of an unreduced benefit.
The Pension Plan provides a pre-retirement survivor benefit to the spouse of a married employee or one named beneficiary of an unmarried employee. The Pension Plan provides a disability retirement benefit to employees with at least 15 years of service who are found by CMS to be totally and permanently disabled equal to $26.00 for each year of plan service, plus an additional $350 per month if the participant does not qualify for any Social Security disability benefit. The minimum monthly disability benefit is $450.
The Pension Plan currently limits the annual annuity benefit under IRC Section 415 to no more than $205,000 payable at age 65. Messrs. Russell, Webb, Brunner, and Mengebier are currently eligible to elect early retirement. The remaining NEOs eligible to participate in the Pension Plan are below the minimum retirement age of 55. At the minimum retirement age of 55, 65% of the normal retirement age (age 65) benefit is available. The Pension Plan retirement benefit is unreduced at age 62. The Pension Plan provides an add-on benefit for long-term employees when an employee retires on or after age 58 and has 30 or more years of service. This add-on benefit is equal to the participant's accrued retirement income as of September 1, 2000, if any, multiplied by the early retirement percentage at the time of the employee's retirement, and is added to the retiring employee's retirement annuity. The Present Value of Accumulated Benefit column above is determined using the ASC 715, Plan Accounting-Defined Benefit Plans assumptions including a discount rate (currently 4.90%) and mortality (currently based on the 2000 mortality table with projected mortality improvements).
39
DB SERP
The DB SERP is an unfunded (for purposes of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended) non-qualified supplemental defined benefit retirement plan that provides benefits based on pay, incentives and added service that are not provided by the Pension Plan. In addition, for officers, including NEOs, the DB SERP provides for an additional year of service credit for each year of service until the total of actual and additional service equal 20 years of service and includes any awards under the Annual Incentive Plan as earnings. The maximum benefit under the DB SERP is attained after 35 years (including the additional years of service credit) and no further service credit is provided. Based on prior service, all of the participating NEOs have reached the additional service credit limit. Benefits under the DB SERP plan are payable after retirement to NEOs in the form of an annuity. No NEO has the option for a lump sum payment. The benefit formula used to determine the DB SERP annuity is the same as that used for the Pension Plan; however the DB SERP does not contain the add-on benefit described above. The Pension Plan annuity is subtracted from the DB SERP annuity to determine the annuity payable from the DB SERP. Although a rabbi trust (a trust that is established for the benefit of its participants except that creditors of the Corporation can obtain the assets of the trust) has been established by the Corporation for purposes of paying DB SERP benefits, participants have an unsecured contractual commitment from CMS to pay the amounts due under this plan. Participants with five full years of service who voluntarily terminate service with CMS prior to age 55 receive a benefit without inclusion of incentives and added service starting the first of the month on or after their 55th birthday at a level equal to 38.3% of the age 65 benefit. At the minimum retirement age of 55, 65% of the normal retirement age (age 65) benefit is available. The DB SERP benefit is unreduced at age 62. NEOs have elected a single life annuity or a monthly annuity. The Present Value of Accumulated Benefit column in the table above is determined using the ASC 715 assumptions including a discount rate (currently 4.90%) and mortality (currently based on the 2000 mortality table with projected mortality improvements).
The following table contains nonqualified deferred compensation information for our NEOs for 2013.
2013 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table(1)
Name
|
Plan Name | Executive Contributions in Last FY(2) ($) |
Registrant Contributions in Last FY(3) ($) |
Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($) |
Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions in Last FY ($) |
Aggregate Balance at Last FYE(4) ($) |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) |
|
(b) |
(c) |
(d) |
(e) |
(f) |
||||||||||||
John G. Russell |
DSSP | 49,200 | 29,520 | 53,633 | | 314,431 | ||||||||||||
Thomas J. Webb |
DSSP | 25,800 | 15,480 | 29,724 | | 285,582 | ||||||||||||
James E. Brunner |
DSSP | 10,680 | 6,408 | 56,239 | | 224,221 | ||||||||||||
Daniel J. Malone |
DSSP | 8,400 | 5,040 | 2,705 | | 28,344 | ||||||||||||
|
DC SERP | | 50,375 | 33,844 | | 249,227 | ||||||||||||
John M. Butler |
DSSP | 9,900 | 5,940 | 4,868 | | 83,602 | ||||||||||||
|
DC SERP | | 54,540 | (2,765 | ) | | 340,071 | |||||||||||
David G. Mengebier |
DSSP | 6,600 | 3,960 | 10,533 | | 104,317 |
40
Narrative to 2013 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table
DSSP
An employee who has base salary (excluding any bonus, incentive or other premium pay) before deductions for taxes and other withholdings in excess of the IRC compensation limit is eligible and may elect to participate in the DSSP. The DSSP is an unfunded (for the purposes of Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended) nonqualified tax deferred defined contribution plan. The DSSP is funded by CMS through the use of trusts. However, participants have only an unsecured contractual commitment from us to pay the amounts due under the DSSP and any funds are considered general assets of CMS and are subject to claims of creditors.
A participant in the DSSP may elect in the prior year to defer from 1% to 6% of his or her base salary that exceeds the IRC compensation limit and CMS will match 60% of the deferral; provided that the participant must also defer at least 6% of base salary under the Savings Plan. In addition, a DSSP eligible participant may elect an additional deferral up to 50% of the participant's base salary for the calendar year. This additional deferral is not eligible for a Corporation match. The combined maximum total of the DSSP deferral amount and the 6% Savings Plan deferral is 56% of base salary. At the time a participant elects a deferral, a distribution election is also made for this class year deferral. Each class year deferral is payable either at a certain date five or more years in the future or upon separation from service with CMS either as a series of payments over 2 to 15 years or in a lump sum. The participant decides how Corporation contributions are invested among a broad array of mutual funds selected by CMS and provided by the record keeper. Earnings in the DSSP are based on the change in market value of the mutual funds selected by the participant.
DC SERP
The Corporation established a DC SERP for employees not eligible to participate in the DB SERP. Under the DC SERP, the Corporation provides an amount equal to 5%, 10% or 15% (depending on salary grade) of employee regular earnings plus any awards under the Annual Incentive Plan. Funds equal to the DC SERP are transferred to a mutual fund family at the time CMS makes a contribution. Earnings or losses are based on the rate of return of the mutual funds selected by the participant. Although the DC SERP is funded by us, participants have an unsecured contractual commitment from us to pay the amounts due under this plan. Mr. Butler, who was hired on July 17, 2006, and Mr. Malone, who was rehired August 14, 2006, are the only NEOs covered under the DC SERP (at the 10% level). Full vesting under the DC SERP occurs at age 62 with a minimum of five years of service. Vesting is on a pro-rata basis for years prior to age 62.
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control
As noted above under Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Post-Termination Compensation, Severance and Change-in-Control Benefits, our executives are eligible to receive severance and change-in-control benefits upon a qualifying termination of employment. These benefits are provided through three separate types of agreements:
41
We have entered into ES Agreements with three of the NEOs (Messrs. Russell, Webb and Mengebier) that provide for payments and other benefits if the NEO is terminated under circumstances specified in the ES Agreement at a time when CMS has not undergone a change-in-control (as defined in the ES Agreement). The ES Agreements also provide for payments and other benefits if the NEO is terminated under the circumstances specified in the ES Agreement within two years following a change-in-control of CMS. We have entered into OS Agreements with three of our NEOs (Messrs. Brunner, Butler and Malone). The OS Agreements provide for payments and other benefits if the officer is terminated under circumstances specified in the OS Agreement at a time when we have not undergone a change-in-control (as defined in the CIC Agreement). We have entered into CIC Agreements with three of our NEOs (Messrs. Brunner, Butler and Malone) that provide for payments and other benefits only if the NEO is terminated under the circumstances specified in the CIC Agreements within two years following a change-in-control of CMS. A description of the terms of each of these agreements follows.
ES Agreements and OS Agreements. All of the ES Agreements and the OS Agreements provide for payments of certain benefits, as described in the table below, upon circumstances of termination of the employment of the NEO. Central to an understanding of the rights of each NEO is an understanding of the definition of "Cause." For purposes of these agreements:
These agreements require, as a precondition to the receipt of these payments, that the NEO sign a standard form of release in which he or she waives all claims that he or she might have against the Corporation and certain associated individuals and entities. These agreements also include non-compete and non-solicitation provisions that would apply for a period of 12 months following the NEO's termination of employment and non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions that would apply for an unlimited period of time following the NEO's termination of employment. Payments under these agreements are made in lump sums.
Under the OS Agreements, tenure-based restricted stock awards will vest on a pro-rata basis based upon the service provided prior to the termination date while performance-based restricted stock awards will vest at the end of the performance period on a pro-rata basis based on service provided during the performance period up to the termination date and actual performance of the Corporation. Under the ES Agreements, for a non-change-in-control termination, all restricted stock awarded will be forfeited upon termination.
CIC Agreements and Provisions. All of the ES Agreements and CIC Agreements contain provisions that provide for payments in the event of a change-in-control. The change-in-control provisions ("CIC Provisions") function in a manner similar to the severance provisions in the ES Agreements and the OS Agreements, except that NEOs become entitled to benefits under the CIC Provisions only in the event of a double trigger consisting of a change-in-control and qualifying termination of employment during the two-year period following the change-in-control. As part of the CIC Provisions, a portion of the severance payments to a terminated NEO is consideration for the NEO entering into a "non-compete" agreement.
42
A change-in-control of CMS is defined in both the ES Agreements and the CIC Agreements to mean:
The definitions of Cause and Good Reason are central to an understanding of the NEO's rights under the CIC Provisions. Under the CIC Provisions, "Cause" has the same meaning as set forth in the ES Agreements and the OS Agreements discussed above.
The NEO is said to have Good Reason to terminate his or her employment under the CIC Provisions if the assignment to the NEO of duties is materially inconsistent with his or her position (including status, offices, titles, and reporting requirements), authority, or responsibilities as in effect immediately prior to the change-in-control; the Corporation takes any action which results in a material diminution of the NEO's position, authority, duties, or responsibilities as constituted immediately prior to the change-in-control (excluding an isolated, insubstantial, and inadvertent action which is remedied by the Corporation promptly after receipt of notice thereof given by the NEO); there is a material reduction in the NEO's base salary, incentive opportunity, Stock Plan award level, benefits, or status; or under other circumstances specified in the definition, including the relocation of the NEO's principal job location or office to more than 35 miles from its location at the time of entry into the CIC Agreement.
Severance benefits are payable in a lump sum.
The benefits to be provided to the NEOs in each of those situations are described in the table below, which assumes that the termination had taken place on December 31, 2013, the last business day of our most recent fiscal year.
As part of the ES Agreements, CMS has agreed to pay any IRC Section 280G and Section 4999 excise taxes that the NEO would be subject to as a result of the payments following change-in-control. However, the CIC Agreements; which Messrs. Butler, Brunner and Malone have entered, do not contain tax gross-up provisions. The CIC Agreements contain a "best net benefit" provision which provides that the Corporation's payments to the NEO can be reduced to the extent that no portion of the reduced payments shall be subject to the excise tax, but only if the NEO's net after-tax benefit is greater than his or her net after-tax benefit would have been if such reduction were not made and the NEO paid the excise tax.
Restricted stock under the CIC Agreements includes double-trigger vesting provisions (meaning, both a change-in-control and a qualifying termination of employment must occur in order for the equity to vest). Under the CIC Agreements, all tenure-based restricted stock awards will vest upon a change-in-control and performance-based will vest on a pro-rata basis based upon the service provided prior to the change-in-control date with any performance-based restrictions vesting at target level. Under the ES Agreements' CIC Provisions, all restricted stock awarded will vest with any restricted stock subject to performance-based restrictions vesting at target level.
NEOs cannot receive benefits under both the CIC Provisions and the severance provisions of their agreement(s).
43
Retirement/Disability/Death. Upon death, 100% of the restricted stock vests with any performance-based restricted stock vesting at target levels. Upon retirement or disability, tenure-based restricted stock awards will vest on a pro-rata basis based upon the service provided prior to retirement or disability while performance-based restricted stock awards vest at the end of the performance period on a pro-rata basis based on service provided during the performance period prior to the retirement or disability and actual performance of the Corporation during the performance period. In the case of retirement or disability, the Compensation Committees have the discretion, in exceptional circumstances, to waive the forfeiture of restricted stock awarded.
Retired Executive Survivor Benefit. The retired executive survivor benefit plan provides a survivor benefit after retirement for certain employees who held high-level management or executive positions prior to their retirement. This plan is a supplement to the retired employees group term life insurance plan. The amount of the survivor benefit payable to a participant's beneficiary upon the participant's death equals 140% of annualized base salary preceding the date of retirement. This amount is reduced by 10% on every anniversary of the participant's retirement until the benefit amount reaches a minimum of 50% of the initial benefit amount. The amount is further reduced based on insurance payable by other company life insurance plans.
The plan was closed to new participants on July 1, 2012. An eligible participant must be a minimum of 60 years old at the time of retirement or termination to qualify for retired executive survivor benefits. As of December 31, 2013, Messrs. Webb and Brunner are each over the age of 60 and are eligible for benefits under this plan. The value of Mr. Webb's benefit would range from a minimum of $472,000 to a maximum of $951,500 depending on the date of his death relative to his retirement date. The value of Mr. Brunner's benefit would range from a minimum of $295,600 to a maximum of $598,700 depending on the date of his death relative to his retirement date.
The following table provides information concerning potential payments upon termination or change-in-control as of December 31, 2013 for each NEO.
44
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control Table
|
John G. Russell ($) |
Thomas J. Webb ($) |
James E. Brunner ($) |
Daniel J. Malone ($) |
John M. Butler ($) |
David G. Mengebier ($) |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Termination Without Cause Payments(1): |
|||||||||||||||||||
Two times 2013 base salary |
2,150,000 | 1,370,000 | | | | 730,000 | |||||||||||||
One and one half times 2013 base salary |
| | 649,500 | 592,500 | 630,000 | | |||||||||||||
Two times incentive @ 100% 2013 performance target or actual 2012 incentive payment whichever is greater |
2,194,500 | 850,500 | | | | 404,250 | |||||||||||||
Pro-rata incentive based on service period in year triggered |
1,075,000 | 411,000 | | | | 200,750 | |||||||||||||
Unvested restricted stock awards(2) |
| | 1,713,084 | 1,445,767 | 1,302,869 | | |||||||||||||
DC SERP benefit(3) |
| | | 140,190 | 221,046 | | |||||||||||||
Medical Coverage Payment(4) |
37,798 | 37,798 | | | | 37,798 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total |
5,457,298 | 2,669,298 | 2,362,584 | 2,178,457 | 2,153,915 | 1,372,798 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Change-in-Control Payments(5): |
|||||||||||||||||||
Two times 2013 base salary |
2,150,000 | 1,370,000 | 866,000 | | 840,000 | 730,000 | |||||||||||||
One times 2013 base salary |
| | | 395,000 | | | |||||||||||||
Two times incentive @ 100% 2013 performance target or actual 2012 incentive payment whichever is greater |
2,194,500 | 850,500 | | | | 404,250 | |||||||||||||
Two times incentive @ 100% 2013 performance target |
| | 519,600 | | 504,000 | | |||||||||||||
One times incentive @ 100% 2013 performance target |
| | | 237,000 | | | |||||||||||||
Pro-rata incentive based on service period in year triggered |
1,075,000 | 411,000 | 259,800 | 237,000 | 252,000 | 200,750 | |||||||||||||
Estimated Payment for 'Non-compete' Agreement |
2,172,250 | 1,110,250 | 692,800 | 632,000 | 672,000 | 567,125 | |||||||||||||
DC SERP benefit(3) |
| | | 290,290 | 447,846 | | |||||||||||||
Medical Coverage Payment(4) |
56,696 | 56,696 | 56,696 | 37,798 | 56,696 | 56,696 | |||||||||||||
Unvested restricted stock awards(2) |
10,486,050 | 3,098,976 | 1,895,441 | 1,606,664 | 1,449,935 | 1,259,743 | |||||||||||||
Excise Tax Equalization Payment(6) |
7,857,503 | | | | | 1,049,184 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total |
25,991,999 | 6,897,422 | 4,290,337 | 3,435,752 | 4,222,477 | 4,267,748 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Retirement/Disability: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pro-rata incentive based on service period in year triggered |
1,075,000 | 411,000 | 259,800 | 237,000 | 252,000 | 200,750 | |||||||||||||
Unvested restricted stock awards(2) |
7,075,820 | 2,133,132 | 1,713,084 | 1,445,767 | 1,302,869 | 867,419 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total |
8,150,820 | 2,544,132 | 1,972,884 | 1,682,767 | 1,554,869 | 1,068,169 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Death: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pro-rata incentive based on service period in year triggered |
1,075,000 | 411,000 | 259,800 | 237,000 | 252,000 | 200,750 | |||||||||||||
Unvested restricted stock awards(2) |
10,486,050 | 3,098,976 | 2,472,317 | 2,115,312 | 1,914,831 | 1,259,743 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total |
11,561,050 | 3,509,976 | 2,732,117 | 2,352,312 | 2,166,831 | 1,460,493 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
45
The following table contains director compensation information for 2013.
2013 Directors' Compensation Table
Name
|
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) |
Stock Awards(1)(2) ($) |
All Other Compensation(3) ($) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) |
(b) |
(c) |
(d) |
(e) |
|||||||||
Current Directors: |
|||||||||||||
Jon E. Barfield |
90,000 | 85,001 | | 175,001 | |||||||||
Kurt L. Darrow(4) |
14,167 | 49,588 | | 63,755 | |||||||||
Stephen E. Ewing |
85,000 | 85,001 | | 170,001 | |||||||||
Richard M. Gabrys |
90,000 | 85,001 | | 175,001 | |||||||||
William D. Harvey |
85,000 | 85,001 | | 170,001 | |||||||||
David W. Joos |
220,000 | | 85,000 | 305,000 | |||||||||
Philip R. Lochner, Jr. |
122,500 | 85,001 | | 207,501 | |||||||||
Michael T. Monahan |
100,000 | 85,001 | 1,000 | 186,001 | |||||||||
Kenneth L. Way |
92,500 | 85,001 | | 177,501 | |||||||||
Laura H. Wright(4) |
82,500 | 106,261 | | 188,761 | |||||||||
John B. Yasinsky |
95,000 | 85,001 | 16,002 | 196,003 | |||||||||
Former Director: |
|||||||||||||
Merribel S. Ayres |
35,417 | | | 35,417 |
46
Narrative to 2013 Directors' Compensation Table
Non-employee director compensation is benchmarked annually. In 2013, the structure of the director compensation program was changed to provide annual retainers only rather than an annual retainer and meeting fees. In 2013, directors who were not CMS or Consumers employees received an annual cash retainer fee of $85,000. In addition, the Chair of the Audit Committees received an annual cash retainer fee of $15,000 and each other member of the Audit Committees received an annual cash retainer fee of $5,000. The Chair of the Compensation Committees received an annual retainer fee of $10,000. The Chairs of the Finance Committees and the Governance Committees each received an annual cash retainer fee of $7,500. The Presiding Director received an annual cash retainer fee of $25,000 and the Chairman received an annual cash retainer fee of $135,000. Annual retainer fees are paid based on the number of months served on the Boards.
Effective January 1, 2014, directors who are not CMS or Consumers employees receive an annual retainer fee of $95,000, an increase of $10,000 per year. Also, the Chairman receives an annual retainer fee of $150,000, an increase of $15,000 per year. The Chairs of the Finance Committees and the Governance Committees each receives an annual retainer fee of $10,000, an increase of $2,500 per year.
In May 2013, all then-current non-employee directors, except Mr. Joos, were awarded a number of shares of restricted stock with a fair market value at the time of award of $85,005. In May 2013, Mr. Joos received a cash award equivalent to the fair market value of the 2013 non-employee director stock award of $85,000, due to restrictions under the Stock Plan prohibiting awards of restricted stock to non-employee directors for three years after retirement from employment with the Corporation. In 2014, the annual restricted stock award will have a fair market value at the time of the May 2014 award of approximately $100,000. These shares of restricted stock are 100% tenure-based and vest 100% three years from the original award date. Stock ownership guidelines have been adopted by the Boards that align further the interests of the directors with the shareholders. Directors are required to hold CMS Common Stock equivalent in value to five times their annual cash retainer by the end of the fifth calendar year of becoming a director. In the event a director has not met the stock ownership guidelines in the prescribed time frame, in lieu of the director receiving his or her monthly cash retainer, the retainer will be used to purchase CMS Common Stock until such time as the guideline has been met. All directors currently comply with this stock ownership requirement or are currently expected to comply by the end of their fifth calendar year of becoming a director.
47
Directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred in attending Boards or Committees meetings and other company business. Directors who are CMS or Consumers employees do not receive retainers or meeting fees for service on the Boards or as a member of any Committees. Non-employee directors receive a single retainer fee and restricted stock award for service on the CMS and Consumers Boards and each of their Committees.
Pursuant to the Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan ("DCP"), a CMS or Consumers director who is not an employee may, at any time prior to a calendar year in which a retainer and fees are to be earned, irrevocably elect to defer payment, through written notice to CMS or Consumers, of all or a portion of any of the retainer and fees that would otherwise be paid to the director. Deferred amounts will be distributed in a lump sum or in annual installments in cash, as specified in the director's initial election. Fidelity Investments, an independent record keeper, administers the Directors' DCP. The participant decides how contributions are invested among a broad array of mutual funds selected by and provided by the record keeper. Funds equal to the amounts deferred are transferred to Fidelity Investments. Our payment obligations to the director remain an unsecured contractual right to a payment. Mr. Barfield and Mr. Lochner participated in the Directors' DCP in 2013.
Effective with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in May 2004, the Boards' retirement payments policy was discontinued. Although certain current and previously retired directors' accrued benefits under the policy will be preserved, no further years of service will be accrued nor will future increases in the cash retainer impact the preserved payments under this policy. Prior to its discontinuance, the directors' retirement payments policy provided those directors who retire with five years of service on the Boards with annual retirement payments equal to the retainer. These payments continue for a period of time equal to the director's years of service on the Boards. All preserved payments will cease at the death of the retired director. Messrs. Yasinsky and Way are covered by this policy.
All non-employee directors historically had been offered optional life insurance coverage, business-related travel accident insurance, and optional health care insurance, and CMS paid the premiums associated with participation by directors. These insurance coverages will not be provided by the Corporation to directors who had not elected the optional coverage prior to the 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Only Mr. Yasinsky is eligible for this coverage.
PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, the Corporation is providing shareholders with an advisory (non-binding) vote to approve its compensation programs for its Named Executive Officers (NEOs) as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with SEC rules. The Compensation Committees did not make any changes to our executive compensation program since the last shareholder vote, which strongly favored the program (approximately 98% of votes cast were affirmative). We continue to engage with our large institutional holders regarding compensation elements.
As described in detail under Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this Proxy Statement, the Corporation's compensation program is organized around four principles: (1) NEO compensation should be aligned with increasing shareholder value, (2) the compensation program for NEOs should enable the Corporation to compete for and secure top executive talent, (3) NEO compensation should reward measurable results, and (4) the compensation program should be fair and competitive.
We have established our executive compensation program based on balance and simplicity:
48
We annually review all elements of the Corporation's executive compensation program and, in addition to compliance with required rules, we adopt current best practices where appropriate for our business and shareholders. As a result, we have:
Shareholders are encouraged to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables and the related narrative disclosure.
This proposal gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on the overall compensation of our NEOs and the compensation philosophy, policies and practices disclosed in this Proxy Statement. For the reasons discussed above, we are asking our shareholders to indicate their support for our NEO compensation by voting FOR the following resolution at the 2014 Annual Meeting:
RESOLVED: that the compensation paid to the Corporation's named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the related narrative disclosure, is APPROVED.
This vote is an advisory vote only, and therefore it will not bind the Corporation, the Boards or the Compensation Committees. The vote results will not create or imply any change to the Corporation's fiduciary duties or create or imply any additional fiduciary duties for the Corporation or the Boards. However, the Boards value the opinions that the shareholders express in their votes and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future executive compensation decisions as they deem appropriate.
Consistent with the direction of our shareholders, the advisory vote on NEO compensation is held on an annual basis until the next non-binding shareholder vote on the frequency with which the advisory vote on NEO compensation should be held.
THE CMS BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE TO APPROVE THE NON-BINDING ADVISORY PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF THE CORPORATION'S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO THE COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE RULES OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, INCLUDING THE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, THE COMPENSATION TABLES AND THE RELATED NARRATIVE DISCLOSURE.
49
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEES
The Audit Committees of the Boards of Directors of CMS and Consumers oversee CMS' and Consumers' financial reporting process on behalf of the Boards. Management has the primary responsibility for the preparation, presentation and accuracy of the consolidated financial statements and the financial reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. The Audit Committees rely, without independent verification, on the information provided to them and on the representations made by management, the internal auditors and the independent auditors. Accordingly, the Audit Committees' oversight does not provide an independent basis to determine that management has maintained appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles or appropriate internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Furthermore, the Audit Committees' considerations and discussions referred to below do not assure that the audit of CMS' and Consumers' financial statements has been carried out in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB"), that the financial statements are presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, or that CMS' and Consumers' auditors are in fact "independent."
In discharging their oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committees reviewed and discussed with management of CMS and Consumers the audited consolidated financial statements of CMS and Consumers set forth in CMS' and Consumers' 2013 Annual Report to Shareholders and CMS' and Consumers' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. The Audit Committees also discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PwC"), the independent registered public accounting firm for CMS and Consumers in 2013, who are responsible for performing an independent audit of CMS' and Consumers' financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited consolidated financial statements with United States generally accepted accounting principles, the matters required to be discussed by PCAOB Statement on Auditing Standards No. 16Communication with Audit Committees.
The Audit Committees have received a report on the quality control procedures of PwC. The Audit Committees have also discussed with management, the internal auditors and PwC the quality and adequacy of CMS' and Consumers' internal controls, with particular focus on compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Audit Committees reviewed with the internal auditors and PwC their audit plans and audit scope.
The Audit Committees have received from PwC the written communications required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding PwC's communications with the Audit Committees concerning independence and have discussed with PwC their independence from CMS and Consumers. The Audit Committees have discussed with PwC the compatibility of non-audit services with the auditor's independence and have satisfied themselves as to PwC's independence.
In reliance on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committees recommended to the Boards that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in CMS' and Consumers' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, for filing with the SEC.
Michael
T. Monahan (Chair)
Jon E. Barfield
Richard M. Gabrys
Philip R. Lochner, Jr.
Laura H. Wright
50
FEES PAID TO THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
PwC was the principal independent registered public accounting firm for CMS and Consumers for the years 2013 and 2012. Fees, including expenses, for professional services provided by PwC in each of the last two fiscal years are:
|
2013 | 2012 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audit Fees |
$ | 4,520,000 | $ | 4,504,805 | |||
Audit-Related Fees |
136,200 | 241,200 | |||||
Tax Fees |
| | |||||
All Other Fees |
216,800 | 8,000 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total Fees |
$ | 4,873,000 | $ | 4,754,005 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Audit fees include fees associated with the annual audit, the reviews of our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, comfort letters, required statutory audits, fees related to the audit of our internal controls over financial reporting as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other attest services. Audit-related fees include fees associated with assistance related to accounting systems and controls. Tax fees include fees for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. All other fees are related to business impact analysis activities.
The Audit Committees have adopted a policy that requires advance approval for all audit, audit-related, tax and other services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm. The policy provides for pre-approval by the Audit Committees of specifically defined audit and non-audit services. Unless the specific service has been previously pre-approved with respect to that year, the Audit Committees must approve the permitted service before the independent registered public accounting firm is engaged to perform it. The Audit Committees have delegated to the Chair of the Audit Committees authority to approve permitted services, provided that the Chair reports any decisions to the Audit Committees at their next scheduled meeting. One hundred percent of the services performed by the principal independent registered public accounting firm were approved in accordance with the policy in 2013.
PROPOSAL 3: RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committees of CMS' and Consumers' Boards have adopted the following policy:
The Audit Committees' selection of the Corporation's independent auditor shall be submitted to the Corporation's shareholders for their ratification at the Corporation's Annual Meeting of Shareholders. If a majority of shares voted do not ratify the Audit Committees' selection, the Audit Committees will consider the shareholder views when considering its selection of a different independent auditor for the Corporation or its continued retention of its existing auditor for that year.
The Audit Committees have selected PwC, independent registered public accounting firm, to audit our consolidated financial statements for the year 2014. A representative of PwC will be present at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and will have an opportunity to make a statement and respond to appropriate questions.
YOUR BOARDS RECOMMEND A VOTE TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP.
51
PROPOSAL 4: APPROVE THE CORPORATION'S PERFORMANCE
INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN
Introduction. The Boards of CMS and Consumers ("Board"), upon a recommendation of their Compensation Committee and conditioned upon shareholder approval, have approved an amended and restated Performance Incentive Stock Plan (the "2014 Stock Plan"). A copy of the 2014 Stock Plan is included as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement.
If approved by the Corporation's shareholders, the 2014 Stock Plan will become effective on June 1, 2014 and replace the Corporation's current Stock Plan, approved by shareholders in May 2009 (the "Stock Plan"). Any existing awards under the Stock Plan, will remain in effect in accordance with its terms. No new awards will be made under the Stock Plan after its expiration on May 31, 2014.
Purpose. The Board believes that the 2014 Stock Plan is an important tool to: (i) advance the interests of the Corporation and its shareholders by providing long-term incentives to those persons with significant responsibility for creating value for shareholders; (ii) strengthen the Corporation's ability to attract, motivate and retain qualified persons of superior ability and achievement to serve as directors, officers, and in other management positions deemed critical to the long-term success of the Corporation; and (iii) further the ownership interests of key personnel in the Corporation's Common Stock (the "Common Stock"), thereby aligning their long-term interests more closely with those of the Corporation's shareholders.
Shareholder approval of the 2014 Stock Plan is required under the rules of the NYSE. In addition, shareholder approval is necessary to provide the Compensation Committee with the flexibility to grant certain awards that may qualify as performance-based compensation under Internal Revenue Code ("IRC") Section 162(m). IRC Section 162(m) limits the tax deductibility of compensation in excess of $1 million paid to a corporation's chief executive officer and to each of the corporation's other three highest-paid executive officers, other than the chief financial officer, but exempts from this limitation compensation that qualifies as performance-based compensation that is granted under a plan that is approved by shareholders and meets other regulatory requirements. Under the tax regulations, the material terms of the performance goals must be approved by shareholders and receive shareholder re-approval every five years in order to permit the Corporation to treat certain awards made under the 2014 Stock Plan, assuming other applicable conditions are satisfied, as performance-based compensation for purposes of IRC Section 162(m). Approval of the 2014 Stock Plan will constitute approval, for purposes of IRC Section 162(m), of the material terms under which the compensation is to be paid, including the performance goals contained in the 2014 Stock Plan (described below).
Highlights of Key Attributes of the 2014 Stock Plan. Included below are some of the key attributes of the 2014 Stock Plan:
52
Summary of Changes from the Stock Plan to the 2014 Stock Plan. The following items are key changes from the Stock Plan to the 2014 Stock Plan:
Determination of Authorized Shares. Shareholder approval of the 2014 Stock Plan will provide the Corporation with flexibility to grant awards from a pool of shares available under the 2014 Stock Plan for the purposes of attracting, motivating and retaining participants. If the 2014 Stock Plan is approved the approximately 2,068,000 shares of Common Stock available, as of December 31, 2013, under the Stock Plan will no longer be authorized for future grants. Assuming that the 2014 Stock Plan is approved by the Corporation's shareholders, as of June 1, 2014, only the 6,500,000 shares reserved under the 2014 Stock Plan will be authorized for future grants. The closing price of a share of Common Stock on the NYSE on March 14, 2014 was $28.80.
Each officer, non-employee director, or other non-officer employee of the Corporation or its subsidiaries is eligible to participate in the 2014 Stock Plan. The Compensation Committee selects the participants (except in limited circumstances where the CEO has been delegated that authority), determines the amount of each award or grant and prescribes the terms and conditions of each award or grant. As of December 31, 2013, 11 non-employee directors and approximately 4,520 employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries were eligible to participate in the Stock Plan and will be eligible to receive future awards under the 2014 Stock Plan as of June 1, 2014. For each of the past five years, all of our non-employee directors and approximately 100 employees received long-term incentive awards under the Stock Plan.
We are asking shareholders to approve the 2014 Stock Plan, as it will allow the Corporation the opportunity to encourage Common Stock ownership by non-employee directors, executives and other employees and link their financial interests with other shareholders. We believe this proposal enables us to remain competitive in our ability to attract, motivate and retain key talent by providing a pool of shares available for awards. The Corporation believes that the requested 6,500,000 shares under the 2014
53
Stock Plan, on the basis of current assumptions, should provide adequate shares for issuance under the 2014 Stock Plan until the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Description of the 2014 Stock Plan
The following description of the 2014 Stock Plan is a summary and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the 2014 Stock Plan, which is attached as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this summary description have the meaning set forth in the 2014 Stock Plan.
Term of the 2014 Stock Plan. If approved by shareholders at the 2014 Annual Meeting, awards may be granted under the 2014 Stock Plan for a period of up to ten years, unless earlier terminated by the Board. The 2014 Stock Plan will continue in effect until all matters relating to the payment of outstanding awards and administration of the 2014 Stock Plan have been settled.
Administration. The Compensation Committee serves as the Plan Administrator of the 2014 Stock Plan and administers the Awards and Award Documents for Officers and other Eligible Persons. The Governance Committee serves as the Administrator of the 2014 Stock Plan regarding administration of the Awards and Award Documents for Non-Employee Directors.
Maximum Shares of Common Stock Available Under the 2014 Stock Plan and Per Person Limitations. The 2014 Stock Plan covers a maximum of 6,500,000 shares of Common Stock. The 6,500,000 shares of Common Stock authorized under the 2014 Stock Plan is 2.4% of the Corporation's outstanding shares as of December 31, 2013.
IRC Section 162(m) requires, among other things, that the maximum number of shares awarded to specified executive officers under the 2014 Stock Plan must be approved by shareholders in order for the awards to be eligible for treatment as performance-based compensation and not be subject to the $1 million limitation on deductibility for compensation paid to such officers. The maximum shares awarded or granted for any one Officer or Employee for any one calendar year under the 2014 Stock Plan, excluding any Performance Units granted, shall not exceed 500,000 shares of Common Stock, in the aggregate. In the case of Performance Units, no Participant shall be granted Performance Units during any one year that will provide for payment in excess of $2.5 million.
The maximum shares awarded or granted for any one Non-Employee Director for any one calendar year under this 2014 Stock Plan, excluding any Performance Units granted, shall not exceed the lesser of 10,000 shares of Common Stock or a value of $250,000 in the aggregate. Not more than 10% of the total shares reserved for grant or award under the 2014 Stock Plan shall be granted or awarded to Non-Employee Directors.
Any share of Common Stock covered by an Award (or portion of an Award) that is forfeited, canceled or terminated or that expires without being exercised in whole or in part, or that is settled in cash shall again be available for the grant of new Awards under the 2014 Stock Plan. The number of shares of Common Stock that are tendered by a Participant or withheld by the Corporation to pay the exercise price of a Stock Option or to satisfy a Participant's tax withholding obligations in connection with the exercise or settlement of an Award and the number of shares of Common Stock covered by a stock-settled Stock Appreciation Right to the extent exercised will not be available for the grant of new Awards under the 2014 Stock Plan.
Deferral of Payment. The provisions of the Plan regarding payment of Awards shall be subject to and interpreted in accordance with, in all respects, the deferral elections, if any, of the Participant made from time to time in accordance with the Award Document. The Compensation Committee may at its discretion impose mandatory deferral for an Officer or Director to comply with stock ownership requirements outside of the 2014 Stock Plan.
54
Awards. The types of Awards that can be granted under the 2014 Stock Plan are set forth below. Awards are subject to the terms and conditions of the 2014 Stock Plan and such other terms and conditions that may be established by the Plan Administrator in the Award Document.
Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. The Compensation Committee shall establish the exercise price at the time any Stock Option or Stock Appreciation Right is granted at not less than 100% of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date on which such Stock Option or Stock Appreciation Right is granted. Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights granted under the 2014 Stock Plan shall not subsequently be re-priced by reducing the exercise price thereof, nor shall Stock Options or Stock Appreciation Rights granted under the 2014 Stock Plan be canceled and replaced by a subsequent re-grant under the Plan of Stock Options or Stock Appreciation Rights having an exercise price lower than the Stock Options or Stock Appreciation Rights so canceled.
Any Stock Option granted under the 2014 Stock Plan may, at the time of such grant, include a Stock Appreciation Right. A Stock Appreciation Right granted in conjunction with a related underlying Stock Option shall be exercisable only at the time and to the extent the related underlying Stock Option is exercisable and only if the fair market value of the Common Stock exceeds the exercise price of the related underlying Stock Option. A Stock Appreciation Right may also be granted independently of a Stock Option.
Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights are restricted from being exercised for a period of at least twelve months from and after the date of the grant, subject to accelerated vesting in the event of death, Disability, Retirement, or termination of service of the award recipient. Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights terminate as specified in the Award Document, but no later than ten years after the date of grant.
Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units and Unrestricted Common Stock. The Compensation Committee may from time to time award Restricted Common Stock, Restricted Common Stock Units or Unrestricted Common Stock to any Eligible Person it has designated as a Participant and in accordance with such rules as the Compensation Committee may prescribe. The Compensation Committee may also award Restricted Common Stock or Restricted Common Stock Units conditioned on the attainment of performance goals determined by the Compensation Committee as set forth in the Award Document and subject to such other restrictions as the Compensation Committee deems advisable.
The number of shares of Common Stock subject to an Unrestricted Common Stock Award shall be determined by the Compensation Committee. Unrestricted Common Stock Awards shall not be subject to any Restrictions or Performance Criteria; provided, however, Unrestricted Common Stock Awards shall not be granted to Officers.
Restricted Common Stock and Restricted Common Stock Units shall have vesting restrictions imposed by the Compensation Committee for a period of time of at least thirty-six months from and after the date of the Award for Officers and Employees and 12-months for Directors, subject to accelerated vesting in the event of death, Disability, Retirement, or termination of service of the award recipient.
Shares of Restricted Common Stock awarded to a Participant under the 2014 Stock Plan, whether or not vested or transferable, may have full dividend rights as determined by the Compensation Committee and set forth in the Award Document. Dividends with respect to shares of Restricted Common Stock subject to performance-based vesting conditions shall be subject to the same vesting conditions as the underlying shares of Restricted Common Stock.
The Award Document relating to a Restricted Common Stock Unit Award will specify (i) whether such award may be settled in Common Stock, cash or a combination thereof, and (ii) whether the Participant will be entitled to receive on a current or deferred basis, dividend equivalents, with respect to such Award. Any dividend equivalents with respect to Restricted Common Stock Units that are subject to performance-based vesting conditions will be subject to the same restrictions as such Restricted
55
Common Stock Units. Prior to settlement of a Restricted Common Stock Unit, the Participant will have no rights as a shareholder of the Corporation.
Phantom Shares and Performance Units. The Compensation Committee may from time to time grant Phantom Shares, the value of which is determined by reference to a share of Common Stock on terms and conditions as the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may from time to time determine. Each grant of Phantom Shares shall specify the number of Phantom Shares granted, the initial value of such Phantom shares which shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the Common Stock as of the date of grant, the Valuation Dates, the number of Phantom Shares whose Appreciation Value shall be determined on each such Valuation Date, any applicable vesting schedule for such Phantom Shares, and any applicable limitation on payment for such Phantom Shares. Subject to satisfaction of the applicable conditions, the Appreciation Value of a Phantom Share shall be paid to the Participant in cash following the Valuation Date applicable to the Phantom Share.
The Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, grant Performance Units to Eligible Persons. Each Performance Unit will have an initial value that is established by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant and credited to a bookkeeping account established for the Participant, but no Participant shall be granted Performance Units during any one calendar year that will provide for payment in excess of $2.5 million. The Compensation Committee will set performance periods and objectives and other terms and conditions of the grant based upon Performance Criteria.
Performance Criteria. Under the 2014 Stock Plan, the vesting, exercisability or payment of certain Awards may be made subject to the satisfaction of performance goals. The performance goals applicable to a particular Award will be determined by the Plan Administrator at the time of grant. To the extent necessary for an Award to be performance-based compensation under IRC Section 162(m) and the regulations thereunder, the Compensation Committee shall use one or more of the following business criteria, such criteria may be based on corporate-wide or subsidiary, division, operating unit or individual measures: net earnings; operating earnings or income; earnings growth; net income; cash flow (including operating cash flow, free cash flow, discounted cash flow return on investment, and cash flow in excess of cost of capital); earnings per share; earnings per share growth; stock price; total shareholder return; absolute and/or relative return on common shareholders equity; return on shareholders equity; return on capital; return on assets; economic value added (income in excess of cost of capital); independent customer satisfaction studies or indices; expense reduction; sales; or ratio of operating expenses to operating revenues. The applicable Performance Criteria may be applied on a pre- or post-tax basis and may be adjusted to include or exclude objectively determinable components of any Performance Criteria, including, without limitation, special charges such as restructuring or impairment charges, debt refinancing costs, extraordinary or noncash items, unusual, nonrecurring or one-time events affecting the Corporation or its financial statements or changes in law or accounting principles (each an "Adjustment Event"). In the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee, unless such action would cause an Award to a "covered employee" (within the meaning of IRC Section 162(m)) to fail to qualify as performance-based compensation under IRC Section 162(m), the Compensation Committee may amend or adjust the Performance Criteria or other terms and conditions of an outstanding Award in recognition of any Adjustment Event.
Change in Control. In the event of a Change in Control and a qualifying termination as defined under any written employment contract or agreement between the Corporation and an officer, Awards granted under the 2014 Stock Plan shall vest to the extent, if any, provided for in the written employment agreement or contract or separate contractual arrangement applicable to the Award. For a Participant not covered by a written employment contract or agreement, except as otherwise provided by the Compensation Committee, in the event of a Change in Control and an Eligible Termination under the 2014 Stock Plan (generally a termination not involving death, Disability, Retirement or Cause), any portion of an Award subject to time based only restrictions vest fully and an Award subject to a
56
performance-based restriction vest on a pro rata basis to the Change in Control date using the target number of shares as the basis for the pro ration.
Clawback. If, due to a restatement of the Corporation's or an Affiliate's publicly disclosed financial statements or otherwise, an Eligible Person is subject to an obligation to make a repayment or return of benefits to the Corporation or an Affiliate pursuant to a clawback provision contained in the 2014 Stock Plan or any other compensation or benefit plan of the Corporation (a "benefit plan clawback provision"), the Board or Compensation Committee may determine that it shall be a precondition to the vesting of any unvested Award of the Eligible Person under the 2014 Stock Plan, that the Eligible Person fully repay or return to the Corporation any amounts owing under such benefit plan clawback provision. Any and all Awards under the 2014 Stock Plan are further subject to (i) any provision of law which may require the Eligible Person to forfeit or return any benefits provided under the 2014 Stock Plan, in the event of a restatement of the Corporation's or an Affiliate's publicly disclosed accounting statements or other illegal act, or (ii) any clawback policy of the Corporation. The Compensation Committee may also, at its discretion, require a return of a benefit or award in the event of a mistake or accounting error in the calculation of such benefit or award.
Amendment and Termination of the 2014 Stock Plan. The Board reserves the right at any time to amend, suspend or terminate the 2014 Stock Plan in whole or in part and for any reason and without the consent of any Participant or Beneficiary; provided, that no such amendment shall:
Tax Withholding. Each vesting and payment of Common Stock and each vesting and payment with respect to Phantom Shares and Performance Units under the 2014 Stock Plan shall be made subject to federal, state and local tax withholding requirements. For this purpose, the Compensation Committee may provide for the withholding of shares of Common Stock or allow a Participant to pay to the Corporation funds sufficient to satisfy such withholding requirements. The Corporation shall appropriately reduce the amount of stock or cash to be paid to a Participant to cover required tax withholding in connection with the exercise of a Nonqualified Option or Stock Appreciation Right or as a result of a disqualifying disposition of stock acquired upon exercise of an Incentive Option.
New Plan Benefits. The grant of Awards under the 2014 Stock Plan is in the Compensation Committee's discretion and, accordingly, it is not possible to determine amounts that will be received thereunder in the future. For awards under the Stock Plan during 2013 for each of the Non-Employee Directors and Messrs. Russell, Webb, Brunner, Butler, Mengebier and Malone see the 2013 COMPENSATION TABLES presented earlier in this Proxy Statement.
U.S. Federal Taxation of Awards. The following is a brief summary of certain United States federal income tax consequences generally arising with respect to Awards under the 2014 Stock Plan. This discussion does not address all aspects of the United States federal income tax consequences of participating in the 2014 Stock Plan that may be relevant to participants in light of their personal investment or tax circumstances and does not discuss any state, local or non-United States tax consequences of participating in the 2014 Stock Plan.
57
IRC Section 162(m). As noted above, IRC Section 162(m) generally limits to $1 million the amount that a publicly held corporation is allowed each year to deduct for the compensation paid to the corporation's chief executive officer and the corporation's other three most highly compensated executive officers other than the chief financial officer. However, performance-based compensation is not subject to the $1 million deduction limit. To qualify as performance-based compensation, the following requirements must be satisfied: (i) the performance goals are determined by a committee consisting solely of two or more "outside directors"; (ii) the material terms under which the compensation is to be paid, including the performance goals, are approved by the corporation's shareholders; and (iii) the committee certifies that the applicable performance goals are satisfied before payment of any performance-based compensation is made. The Compensation Committee currently consists solely of "outside directors" for purposes of IRC Section 162(m). As a result, certain compensation under the 2014 Stock Plan, such as that payable with respect to Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, is not expected to be subject to the $1 million deduction limit, but other compensation payable under the 2014 Stock Plan, such as any Restricted Common Stock Award or Restricted Common Stock Unit Award that is not subject to IRC Section 162(m) performance goals, would be subject to such limit.
Stock Options. A Participant will not recognize taxable income at the time a Stock Option is granted and the Corporation will not be entitled to a tax deduction at that time. A Participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding, in the case of an employee) upon exercise of a Nonqualified Option equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares purchased over their exercise price, and the Corporation expects to be entitled to a corresponding deduction. A Participant will not recognize income (except for purposes of the alternative minimum tax) upon exercise of an Incentive Option. If the shares acquired by exercise of an Incentive Option are held for at least two years from the date the Incentive Option was granted and one year from the date it was exercised, any gain or loss arising from a subsequent disposition of those shares will be taxed as long-term capital gain or loss, and the Corporation will not be entitled to any deduction. If, however, those shares are disposed of within the above-described period, then in the year of that disposition, the Participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income equal to the lesser of (1) the amount realized upon that disposition, and (2) the excess of the fair market value of those shares on the date of exercise over the exercise price, and the Corporation expects to be entitled to a corresponding deduction.
Stock Appreciation Rights. A Participant will not recognize taxable income at the time Stock Appreciation Rights are granted and the Corporation will not be entitled to a tax deduction at that time. Upon exercise, the Participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding, in the case of an employee) in an amount equal to the fair market value of any shares and the amount of any cash delivered. This amount is expected to be deductible by the Corporation as compensation expense.
Restricted Common Stock. A Participant will not recognize taxable income at the time Restricted Common Stock is awarded and the Corporation will not be entitled to a tax deduction at that time, unless the Participant makes an election to be taxed at that time. If such election is made, the Participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in the case of an employee) at the time of grant in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value for the shares at such time over the amount, if any, paid for those shares. If such election is not made, the Participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in the case of an employee) at the time the restrictions constituting a substantial risk of forfeiture lapse in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at such time over the amount, if any, paid for those shares. The amount of ordinary income recognized by making the above-described election or upon the lapse of such restrictions is deductible by the Corporation as compensation expense, except to the extent the deduction limits of IRC Section 162(m) apply. In addition, a Participant receiving dividends with respect to Restricted Common Stock for which the
58
above-described election has not been made and prior to the time such restrictions lapse will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding, in the case of an employee), rather than dividend income, in an amount equal to the dividends paid and the Corporation will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, except to the extent the deduction limits of IRC Section 162(m) apply.
Restricted Common Stock Units. A Participant will not recognize taxable income at the time a Restricted Common Stock Unit is granted and the Corporation will not be entitled to a tax deduction at that time. Upon the settlement of Restricted Common Stock Units, the Participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding, in the case of an employee) in an amount equal to the fair market value of any shares delivered and the amount of cash paid by the Corporation. This amount is deductible by the Corporation as compensation expense, except to the extent the deduction limits of IRC Section 162(m) apply.
Unrestricted Common Stock. The Participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding, in the case of an employee) at the time Unrestricted Common Stock is granted and in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares granted. This amount is deductible by the Corporation as compensation expense, except to the extent the deduction limits of IRC Section 162(m) apply.
Phantom Shares and Performance Unit Awards. A Participant will not recognize taxable income at the time Phantom Shares or Performance Units are granted and the Corporation will not be entitled to a tax deduction at that time. Upon the settlement of Phantom Shares or Performance Units, the Participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding, in the case of an employee) in an amount equal to the fair market value of any shares delivered and the amount of cash paid by the Corporation. This amount is deductible by the Corporation as compensation expense, except to the extent the deduction limits of IRC Section 162(m) apply.
YOUR BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE TO APPROVE THE PROPOSAL
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Information as of December 31, 2013 concerning compensation plans under which equity securities are authorized for issuance is as follows:
|
Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights |
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights |
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a)) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(a) |
(b) |
(c) |
|||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
0 | N.A. | 2,068,751 |
59
PROPOSAL 5: APPROVE THE PERFORMANCE MEASURES USED IN THE CMS INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
The Boards approved and adopted the CMS Incentive Compensation Plan for CMS and Consumers Officers ("Annual Incentive Plan"), in order to award payment of annual cash bonuses to certain CMS and Consumers executive officers and directed that the material terms of the Annual Incentive Plan performance measures be submitted to CMS shareholders for approval so that payments under the Annual Incentive Plan may qualify as performance-based compensation under IRC Section 162(m), assuming other regulatory requirements are satisfied.
As noted in Proposal 4, IRC Section 162(m) limits the tax deductibility of compensation in excess of $1 million paid to a corporation's chief executive officer and to each of the corporation's other three highest-paid executive officers, other than the chief financial officer, but exempts from this limitation compensation that qualifies as performance-based compensation that is granted under a plan that is approved by shareholders and meets other regulatory requirements. Under the tax regulations, the material terms of the performance goals must be approved by shareholders every five years, so that certain compensation paid under the Annual Incentive Plan may qualify as performance-based compensation under IRC Section 162(m).
The following is a description of the material terms of the performance measures and certain other material terms of the Annual Incentive Plan. This description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Annual Incentive Plan, a copy of which has been included as Appendix B to the Proxy Statement.
The Compensation Committees of the Boards ("Compensation Committee"), which is entirely composed of independent members of the Board, administers the Corporation's and Consumers' incentive compensation plans and related contractual arrangements; specifically, the Annual Incentive Plan. The Annual Incentive Plan is a cash plan that pays out on the basis of the achievement of goals set for a single fiscal year. The Annual Incentive Plan provides cash compensation to NEOs only if, and to the extent that, performance conditions approved by the Compensation Committee are met.
Under the terms of the Annual Incentive Plan, Officers of CMS and/or Consumers who do not participate in a broad based incentive plan contingent upon objectives and performance unique to the Officers' subsidiary, affiliate, site and/or business unit, are eligible for participation. As of March 14, 2014, the Corporation's officers, approximately 20 individuals, were eligible to receive incentive compensation based on the attainment of performance goals under the Annual Incentive Plan. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this Proxy Statement for payments under the Annual Incentive Plan and the Annual Incentive Plan's performance-based criteria. In 2013, payments were based on the attainment of performance goals related to the Corporation's adjusted earnings per share and operating cash flow. However, based on the Board's strategic priorities for CMS, in other years, the Compensation Committee may set other performance goals. If the performance goals are met, the award for officers is based on a percentage of salary depending on salary grade. The maximum amount of an award for any employee covered by IRC Section 162(m) cannot exceed $2.5 million in any one year.
The performance measures that may be used in setting performance goals under the Annual Incentive Plan include:
Net earnings; operating earnings or income; earnings growth; net income; cash flow (including operating cash flow, free cash flow, discounted cash flow return on investment, and cash flow in excess of cost of capital); earnings per share; earnings per share growth; stock price; total shareholder return; absolute and/or relative return on common shareholders equity; return on shareholders equity; return on capital; return on assets; economic value added (income in excess of cost of capital); independent customer satisfaction studies or indices; expense reduction; sales; or ratio of operating expenses to operating revenues. In addition, the Annual Incentive Plan may incorporate certain utility operating parameters such as safety, reliability and customer service. The
60
applicable Performance Goals may be applied on a pre- or post-tax basis and may be adjusted to include or exclude objectively determinable components of any Performance Goal, including, without limitation, special charges such as restructuring or impairment charges, debt refinancing costs, extraordinary or noncash items, unusual, nonrecurring or one-time events affecting the Corporation or its financial statements or changes in law or accounting principles. In the sole discretion of the Committee, unless such action would cause an Award to a "covered employee" (within the meaning of IRC Section 162(m)) to fail to qualify as qualified performance-based compensation under IRC Section 162(m), the Committee may amend or adjust the Performance Goal or other terms and conditions of an outstanding Award in recognition of any Adjustment Event.
These are the performance measures that shareholders are being asked to approve.
The Board may amend, suspend or terminate the Annual Incentive Plan, subject to any requirement of shareholder approval required by applicable law or regulation.
The Board recommends that the material terms of the performance goals of the Annual Incentive Plan be approved. Shareholder approval of the performance measures is only one of several requirements under IRC Section 162(m) that must be satisfied for awards under the Annual Incentive Plan to qualify for the performance-based compensation exception. There is no guarantee that amounts paid under the Annual Incentive Plan will, in practice, be deductible by CMS.
YOUR BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE TO APPROVE THE PROPOSAL
2015 PROXY STATEMENT INFORMATION
Under SEC rules, if a shareholder wishes to submit a proposal for possible inclusion in our 2015 Proxy Statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, we must receive it on or before December 5, 2014. Our Bylaws provide that in order for a shareholder to propose business or nominate persons for election to our Boards at an annual meeting, written notice containing the information required by the Bylaws must be delivered to our Corporate Secretary no later than 60 days nor earlier than 90 days before the anniversary of the prior year's annual meeting, that is, after February 15, 2015 but no later than March 17, 2015 for the 2015 Annual Meeting. Shareholder proposals and nominations should be addressed to: Corporate Secretary, CMS Energy Corporation, One Energy Plaza, Jackson, Michigan 49201.
61
PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN
The CMS Energy Corporation Performance Incentive Stock Plan, first effective February 3, 1988, is hereby set forth as amended and restated effective June 1, 2014.
The CMS Energy Corporation Performance Incentive Stock Plan (hereinafter called the "Plan") is a Plan to provide incentive compensation to Eligible Persons, based upon such Eligible Persons' individual contributions to the long-term growth and profitability of the Corporation, and in order to encourage such Eligible Persons to identify with shareholder concerns and their current and continuing interest in the development and financial success of the Corporation. Because it is expected that the efforts of Officers, Employees or Directors selected for participation in the Plan will have a significant impact on the results of the Corporation's operations in future years, the Plan is intended to assist the Corporation in attracting and retaining Officers, Employees or Directors of superior ability and in motivating their activities on behalf of the Corporation.
62
(a) The continued failure by the Participant to substantially perform his or her duties of employment (other than any such failure resulting from the Participant's Disability), after a demand for substantial performance is delivered to the Participant that identifies the manner in which the Committee believes that the Participant has not substantially performed his or her duties, and the Participant has failed to remedy the situation within a reasonable period of time specified by the Committee which shall not be less than 30 days; or
(b) The Participant's (i) indictment for a felony or (ii) a conviction for a misdemeanor involving fraud, embezzlement, theft, misappropriation or failure to be truthful; or
(c) The Participant's (i) gross negligence, (ii) failure or refusal, on request or demand by the Corporation or any governmental authority, to provide testimony to or cooperate with any governmental regulatory authority, or any other similar non-cooperation by the Participant, (iii) willful engaging in misconduct materially or demonstrably injurious to the business or reputation (by adverse publicity or otherwise) of the Corporation, monetarily or otherwise, or (iv) violation of a material provision of the Corporation's code of conduct and/or code of ethics, including but not limited to violations of the Corporation's policies relating to substance abuse and discrimination.
63
64
sole discretion of the Committee, unless such action would cause an Award to a Code Section 162(m) Employee to fail to qualify as qualified performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m), the Committee may amend or adjust the Performance Criteria or other terms and conditions of an outstanding Award in recognition of any Adjustment Event.
Article III. Effective Date, Duration, Scope and Administration of the Plan
65
shall be the Plan Administrator for Non-Employee Directors including any Award or any Award Document with respect to Non-Employee Directors.
The Committee shall have full power and authority to construe, interpret and administer the Plan. All decisions, actions or interpretations of the Committee shall be final, conclusive and binding upon all parties. If any Participant objects to any such interpretation or action formally or informally, the expenses of the Committee and its agents and counsel shall be chargeable against any amounts otherwise payable under the Plan to or on account of the Participant.
Article IV. Participation, Awards and Grants
The Committee, at its sole discretion, may give authorization to the chief executive officer of the Corporation to award a specified number of shares of Common Stock and/or grant Restricted Common Stock Units, Phantom Shares, Performance Units, Stock Options and/or Stock Appreciation Rights to Employees designated as Participants; provided, however, such authorization shall not be given with regard to the selection for participation in this Plan of an Officer, Director or other person subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act or decisions concerning the timing, pricing or amount of an award to such an Officer, Director or other person subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
66
or custom. Moreover, the Committee may approve such supplements to or alternative versions of the Plan as it may consider necessary or appropriate for such purposes without thereby affecting the terms of the Plan as in effect for any other purpose; provided, however, no such supplement or alternative version shall: (a) increase the number of available shares of Common Stock under Section 5.1 of the Plan; or (b) increase the limitations contained in Section 5.3 of the Plan; or (c) increase the individual compensation limit in Section 8.2 of the Plan.
Eligible Persons who are subject to United States of America taxes are not eligible to receive a Stock Option or Stock Appreciation Right that does not meet the requirements for exemption from Code Section 409A.
Article V. Shares Reserved Under the Plan
For purposes of determining the number of shares that remain available for issuance under this Plan, (i) the number of shares of Common Stock that are tendered by a Participant or withheld by the
67
Corporation to pay the exercise price of a Stock Option or to satisfy the Participant's tax withholding obligations in connection with the exercise or settlement of an Award and (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock covered by a stock-settled Stock Appreciation Right to the extent exercised, shall be deemed to have been released or delivered for purposes of determining the maximum number of shares of Common Stock available under the terms of this Plan and will not be available for new grants or awards.
If upon the exercise of a Nonqualified Option and/or a Stock Appreciation Right or as a result of a disqualifying disposition (within the meaning of Code Sections 422 and 424) of shares acquired upon exercise of an Incentive Option, there shall be payable by the Corporation any amount for income tax withholding, either the Corporation shall appropriately reduce the amount of stock or cash to be paid to the Optionee or the Optionee shall pay such amount to the Corporation to reimburse it for such income tax withholding.
At no point shall the amount paid by the Corporation for such federal, state and/or local tax withholding be in excess of the minimum applicable statutory limits.
68
Article VI. Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights
The exercise of the underlying Stock Option shall terminate the related Stock Appreciation Right to the extent of the number of shares purchased upon exercise of the underlying Stock Option. The exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right shall terminate the related underlying Stock Option to the extent of the number of shares with respect to which the Stock Appreciation Right is exercised. Upon exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right, an Optionee shall be entitled to receive, without payment to the Corporation (except for applicable withholding taxes), an amount equal to the excess of (i) the then aggregate fair market value of the number of shares with respect to which the Optionee exercises the Stock Appreciation Right, over (ii) the aggregate Stock Option price per share for such number of shares. Such amount may be paid by the Corporation, in cash, Common Stock or any combination thereof.
Notwithstanding the above, the Committee may grant Stock Appreciation Rights that are not in conjunction with a related underlying Stock Option. The basis used in determining any increase in the value of the Common Stock under such Stock Appreciation Right shall be not less than 100% of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant. To the extent, if any, that the Committee elects to grant such Stock Appreciation Rights, then such Stock Appreciation Rights shall in all respects be intended to be exempt from Code Section 409A. Other than as
69
contemplated in Section 5.2, in no event shall Stock Appreciation Rights previously granted under this Plan be re-priced by reducing the exercise price thereof, nor shall Stock Appreciation Rights previously granted under this Plan be canceled and replaced by a subsequent re-grant under this Plan of Stock Appreciation Rights having an exercise price lower than the Stock Appreciation Rights so canceled.
Article VII. Restricted Common Stock, Restricted Common Stock Units and Unrestricted Common Stock
70
prescribe. The Committee may also award Restricted Common Stock or Restricted Common Stock Units conditioned on the attainment of a performance goal measured by Performance Criteria as determined by the Committee and set forth in the Award Document and subject to such other restrictions as the Committee deems advisable.
71
deferred dividend equivalents, with respect to the number of shares of Common Stock subject to such Award. Any dividend equivalents with respect to Restricted Common Stock Units that are subject to performance-based restrictions shall be subject to the same Restrictions as such Restricted Common Stock Units. Prior to the settlement of a Restricted Common Stock Unit Award, the Participant shall have no rights as a shareholder of the Corporation with respect to the shares of Common Stock subject to such Award.
Article VIII. Phantom Shares and Performance Units.
72
Participant shall be granted Performance Units during any one calendar year that will provide for payment in excess of $2.5 million. The Committee will set performance periods and objectives and other terms and conditions of the grant based upon Performance Criteria as determined by the Committee that, depending upon the extent to which they are met, will determine the value of Performance Units that will be paid out to the Participant. The Committee may pay earned Performance Units in cash, Common Stock or a combination thereof.
Article IX. Amendment, Duration and Termination of the Plan
Notwithstanding anything contained in this Plan or any Award Document to the contrary, the Corporation shall have the unilateral right to amend this Plan and the Awards and Award Documents thereunder at any time to the extent deemed necessary or advisable by the Corporation to ensure compliance with, or exemption from, the requirements of Section 409A.
73
74
return to the Corporation any amounts granted, awarded or paid under this Plan, or may determine that all or any portion of an Award shall not vest, if:
Unless otherwise required by law, the provisions of this Subsection 10.3b. relating to the return of previously vested Plan benefits shall not apply unless a claim is made therefore by the Corporation within three years of the vesting of such benefits.
75
"Change in Control" means a change in control of CMS Energy Corporation, and shall be deemed to have occurred upon the first to occur of any of the following events:
76
clause (d)(2), the sale, transfer or disposition of assets has to be in a transaction or series of transactions closing within six (6) months after the closing of the first transaction in the series, other than with an entity in which at least fifty-one 51% of the combined voting power of the voting securities is owned by stockholders of CMS Energy Corporation in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of CMS Energy Corporation immediately prior to such transaction or transactions and immediately following which the individuals who comprise the Board immediately prior thereto constitute at least a majority of the board of directors of the entity to which such assets are sold, transferred or disposed or, if such entity is a subsidiary, the ultimate parent thereof.
Notwithstanding the foregoing clauses (a), (c) and (d), a "Change in Control" shall not be deemed to have occurred by virtue of the consummation of any transaction or series of integrated transactions closing within six (6) months after the closing of the first transaction in the series immediately following which the record holders of the common stock of CMS Energy Corporation immediately prior to such transaction or series of transactions continue to have substantially the same proportionate ownership in an entity which owns all or substantially all of the assets of CMS Energy Corporation immediately following such transaction or series of transactions.
77
CMS INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN FOR CMS ENERGY AND CONSUMERS ENERGY OFFICERS
78
79
80
Annual Award = Base Salary times
Standard Award Percentage times Plan Performance Factor
In addition, each Annual Award for Officers of Consumers Energy Company may be modified based on the results achieved for the Consumers Energy Annual Employee Incentive Compensation Plan. If the Consumers Energy Annual Employee Incentive Compensation Plan does not pay out an operational award for the same Performance Year, then the Annual Award, if any, earned under this Plan will be reduced by 10%. If the Consumers Energy Annual Employee Incentive Compensation Plan pays out an operational award for the same Performance Year based on achievement of some of the established objectives, but not at the maximum award percentage, then there is no modification of awards under this Plan. If however, the Consumers Energy Annual Employee Incentive Compensation Plan pays out an operational award at the maximum award percentage for the same Performance Year based on achievement of the established objectives, then the Annual Award, if any, earned under this Plan will be increased by up to 10%, provided, however, that no such increase will cause the Annual Award to exceed the maximum of two times the standard award amount, or exceed the maximum payout for a Code Section 162(m) Employee.
81
82
83
Plan for the current Performance Year will cease and the participant will not be eligible to make any deferral elections under this Plan for the following Performance Year.
Payments in the event of a change in status will not be made if no Annual Awards are made for the Performance Year.
84
entity engaged in the business of (1) selling (a) electric power or natural gas at retail or wholesale within the State of Michigan or (b) electric power at wholesale within the market area in which an electric generating plant owned by a subsidiary or affiliate of CMS Energy is located or (2) developing an electric generating plant within the State of Michigan or a market area in which an electric generating plant owned by a subsidiary or affiliate of CMS Energy is located.
Unless otherwise required by law, the provisions of this Subsection (b) relating to the return of previously paid Plan benefits shall not apply unless a claim is made therefore by the Company within three years of the payment of such benefits.
85
entitled. The rights set forth in this Plan concerning the right of the Company to a clawback are in addition to any other rights to recovery or damages available at law or equity and are not a limitation of such rights.
86
COMMON STOCK PROXY SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS The undersigned appoints DAVID W. JOOS, JOHN G. RUSSELL and MELISSA M. GLEESPEN, and each of them, proxies with full power of substitution, to vote on behalf of the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of CMS Energy Corporation to be held at the Corporate Headquarters located at One Energy Plaza, Jackson, Michigan, at 9:00 AM Eastern Daylight Saving Time on May 16, 2014 and at any adjournment(s) thereof. Said proxies, and each of them present and acting at the meeting, may vote upon the matters set forth on the reverse side hereof and with discretionary authority on all other matters that come before the meeting, all as more fully set forth in the Proxy Statement received by the undersigned. The shares represented hereby will be voted on the proposals as specified. IF THIS PROXY IS RETURNED SIGNED BUT NOT FULLY COMPLETED, IT WILL BE VOTED AS RECOMMENDED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON ALL UNCOMPLETED ITEMS. IF YOU CANNOT VOTE BY TOUCH-TONE PHONE OR INTERNET, PLEASE VOTE, SIGN AND DATE THIS PROXY ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND RETURN IT IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PROMPT RESPONSE. Please Fold and Detach Proxy Card at Perforation (After you vote by phone or Internet, PLEASE THROW AWAY THE CARD ABOVE.) Thank you for being a CMS Energy shareholder. Please take a moment now to vote your shares for the upcoming Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Your Vote is Important! You may vote in one of three ways: OPTION 1: Vote by telephone: Call toll-free 1-888-693-8683 using a touch-tone phone 24 hours a day, 7 days per week. Have your attached proxy card at hand when you call and then follow the instructions. There is no charge for this call. OPTION 2: Vote via the Internet: www.cesvote.com and respond to a few simple prompts. (Your telephone or Internet vote authorizes the voting of your shares in the same manner as if you had marked, signed and returned your proxy card.) THANK YOU FOR VOTING BY TELEPHONE OR INTERNET AND SAVING COSTS! OPTION 3: If you do not have access to a touch-tone phone or to the Internet, please complete and return the proxy card above. For Touch-Tone Telephone: 1-888-693-8683 Internet Voting: www.cesvote.com |
PLEASE VOTE BY TOUCH-TONE TELEPHONE OR INTERNET IF POSSIBLE TO MINIMIZE COSTS. PLEASE VOTE FOR EACH ITEM, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY. IF THIS PROXY IS RETURNED SIGNED BUT NOT FULLY COMPLETED, IT WILL BE VOTED AS RECOMMENDED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON ALL UNCOMPLETED ITEMS. INTERNET ACCESS: I would prefer to access annual reports and proxy statements on the internet. (No paper copies. You do not need to provide an E-mail address.) THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR ITEMS 1 THROUGH 5. 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN (01) Jon E. Barfield (02) Kurt L. Darrow (03) Stephen E. Ewing (04) Richard M. Gabrys (05) William D. Harvey (06) David W. Joos (07) Philip R. Lochner, Jr. (08) John G. Russell (09) Kenneth L. Way (10) Laura H. Wright (11) John B. Yasinsky 2. ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE CORPORATIONS EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 3. RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP). FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 4. PROPOSAL TO APPROVE PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 5. PROPOSAL TO APPROVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES IN INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN HOUSEHOLDING: I receive more than one annual report and proxy statement. Please do not send annual reports or proxy statements for this account in the future. IF YOU CANNOT VOTE BY TOUCH-TONE PHONE OR INTERNET, PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. (No postage is needed if mailed in the United States.) Signed ___________________________________ Dated _____________________________ , 2014 Cooper StreetNorth FrancisCooper StreetInterstate94Exit 139One Mile WashingtonFrancisCooperParkingRamp CMS Energy Corporation and Consumers Energy Company Annual Meeting of Shareholders Corporate Headquarters One Energy Plaza Jackson, Michigan Phone: (517) 788-0550 May 16, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. website: www.cmsenergy.com CMS Energy One Energy Plaza Jackson, Michigan Shareholders interested in attending the annual meeting must bring proof of current stock ownership (such as a recent account statement) and government- issued photo identification (such as a drivers license) in order to be admitted to the meeting. Directions to One Energy Plaza Take I-94 to Cooper Street, Exit 139, south Travel one mile south on Cooper Street then keep right on North Francis Street Turn left on drive into the CMS Energy corporate headquarters Park in parking ramp immediately to your right 359 3-14(A) |