UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC  20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

( X )  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007

OR

(    )  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________ to ______________

Commission File Number:  1-16129

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  (X)     No  (   )

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes   (   )      No   (X)

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

FLUOR CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

September 30, 2007

1

PART I:  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

FLUOR CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS

UNAUDITED

  See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2

FLUOR CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

UNAUDITED

*Amounts at December 31, 2006 have been derived from audited financial statements.

  See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

FLUOR CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

UNAUDITED

   See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

FLUOR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

UNAUDITED

(1)                              The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements do not include footnotes and certain financial information normally presented annually under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and therefore should be read in conjunction with the company’s December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K. Accounting measurements at interim dates inherently involve greater reliance on estimates than at year-end. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of results that can be expected for the full year.

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included herein are unaudited; however, they contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals, including certain contract loss provisions) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly its consolidated financial position at September 30, 2007 and its consolidated results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 and its cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.

Certain 2006 amounts have been reclassified to conform with the 2007 presentation.

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to US GAAP requiring use of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Management is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 157 on the company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

(2)                                  The components of comprehensive income, net of related tax, are as follows:

(3)                                  The effective tax rates, based on the company’s actual operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 were approximately 39.7 percent and 37.1 percent, respectively. The utilization of net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards and an increase in the extraterritorial income exclusion and the domestic production activities deduction, resulted in recognition of tax benefit of $13.5 million in the third quarter of 2006. These factors reduced the effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 to 30.6 percent.

In June 2006, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), an interpretation of FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS No. 109”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in enterprises’ financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109. The interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Also, the interpretation provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and

5

FLUOR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

UNAUDITED

transition. This interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, and the company adopted this interpretation in the first quarter of 2007.

As a result of the adoption of FIN 48, the company recognized a cumulative-effect adjustment of $45 million, increasing its liability for unrecognized tax benefits, interest and penalties and reducing the January 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings. As of the date of adoption, including the impact of recognizing the increase in liability noted above, the company’s unrecognized tax benefits totaled $351 million of which $166 million, if recognized, would affect the company’s effective tax rate. There was no material change in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007.

The company conducts business globally and, as a result, the company or one or more of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. In the normal course of business the company is subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world, including such major jurisdictions as Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, South Africa, the United Kingdom and the United States. Although the company believes its tax estimates for its tax positions are reasonable, the final outcome of tax audits could be materially different, both favorable and unfavorable. With few exceptions, the company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations for years before 1996.

In connection with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) examination of the company’s income tax returns for the tax years beginning November 1, 1995 through December 31, 2000, the IRS proposed certain significant adjustments that, if sustained, would result in additional taxes and penalties. The company filed protests with IRS Appeals contesting many of the proposed adjustments and all of the proposed penalties. The company reached a tentative agreement with IRS Appeals in September 2007, which is subject to review by the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation (Joint Committee). Although the final outcome is not determinable until the Joint Committee completes its review, the company anticipates significant favorable adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits within the next six months.

The company recognizes potential interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within its global operations in income tax expense. As of September 30, 2007, the accrual totaled $74 million for the potential payment of interest and penalties, including $3 million and $7 million that was recognized during the three and nine months then ended, respectively.

(4)                                  Cash paid for interest was $28.4 million and $13.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Income tax payments, net of receipts, were $166.2 million and $129.5 million during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

(5)                                  Dilutive securities included in the determination of shares used to compute diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) are as follows:

6

FLUOR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

UNAUDITED

(6)                                  Operating information by segment is as follows:

A reconciliation of the segment information to consolidated amounts is as follows:

Corporate administrative and general expense includes non-operating income of $0.6 million and non-operating expense of $2.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, compared with income of $0.5 million in the three months and expense of  $4.9 million in the nine months of 2006. The nine month amount in 2006 includes $3.6 million relating to the impairment of an investment.

Total assets in the Oil & Gas segment increased to $753 million at September 30, 2007 from $629 million at December 31, 2006 primarily due to the increased level of project execution activities.

Total assets in the Industrial & Infrastructure segment increased to $829 million at September 30, 2007 from $686 million at December 31, 2006 primarily related to the build out of the National Roads Telecommunications Services project as discussed in Note 7.

Total assets in the Government segment decreased to $321 million at September 30, 2007 from $597 million at December 31, 2006 due to the billing and collection of substantially all of the previously unbilled fees on the Fernald project during the second quarter and progress towards completion on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”) and Iraq reconstruction contracts. All of the other segments have experienced increases in assets during 2007 as the result of higher levels of project execution activities.

(7)           During 2004, the company issued $330 million of 1.5 percent Convertible Senior Notes (the “Notes”) due 2024, realizing net proceeds of $323 million. In December 2004, the company irrevocably elected to pay the principal amount of the Notes in cash if a specified trading price of the

7

FLUOR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

UNAUDITED

company’s common stock (the “trigger price”) is achieved and maintained for a specified period and the Notes are presented by the holders for conversion. The trigger price condition has been satisfied during each period since the fourth quarter of 2005 and the Notes have therefore been classified as short-term debt as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006.

On August 31, 2007, the FASB issued for comment Staff Position APB 14-a -- “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)” (FSP APB 14-a). FSP APB 14-a requires the issuer of a convertible debt instrument to separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that reflects the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. FSP APB 14-a, if approved, would become effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007 and would be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. Management is currently evaluating the impact on the company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows if the proposed FSP APB 14-a is issued as currently drafted.

National Roads Telecommunications Services (“NRTS”) Project

During 2005, the company’s Industrial & Infrastructure segment was awarded a $544 million project by a joint venture, GeneSYS Telecommunications Limited (“GeneSYS”), which is consolidated in the company’s consolidated financial statements. The project was entered into with the United Kingdom Secretary of State for Transport (the “Highways Agency”) to design, build, maintain and finance a new integrated transmission network throughout England’s motorways. The project will be executed by GeneSYS, in which the company owns a 45 percent interest, and HSBC Infrastructure Fund Management Limited, which owns a 55 percent interest. GeneSYS will finance the engineering and construction (“E&C”) of upgraded telecommunications infrastructure with approximately $285 million (£140 million) of non-recourse debt (the “term loan facility”) from a consortium of lenders (the “Banks”) along with joint venture member capital contributions. In September 2007, the joint venture members contributed $44 million to fund their equity commitments. The funds were used to repay debt from the banks including the company’s equity bridge loan. In early October 2007, the newly constructed network achieved operational status.

Based on a qualitative analysis of the operations of GeneSYS and the variable interests of all parties to the arrangement, under the provisions of FIN 46-R the company has been determined to be the primary beneficiary of the joint venture. The company’s condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of GeneSYS, and, accordingly, the non-recourse debt provided by the Banks totaling $278 million and $193 million at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.

The term loan facility provides for interest only at LIBOR plus a margin of 95 basis points during construction of the upgraded facilities reducing to a margin of 90 basis points after completion of construction and continuing until fully repaid. Commitment fees are payable on unused portions of the facility. Payments commence in 2008 and are due in installments over the term of the service period ending in 2016.

The term loan facility is an obligation of GeneSYS and will never be a debt obligation of the company because it is non-recourse to the joint venture members. Accordingly, in the event of a default on the term loans, the lenders may only look to the resources of GeneSYS for repayment. The debt will never be repayable from assets of the company beyond its gross $20 million equity investment plus any un-remitted profits in the venture.

The contract has been segmented between the E&C and operations & maintenance (“O&M”) portions of the work to be performed. The E&C portion of the work is being accounted for using contract accounting revenue recognition principles. As of September 30, 2007, a total of $254 million of E&C revenue has been recognized, including $79 million during 2007, for which the related receivable is included primarily in other noncurrent assets in the accompanying Condensed

8

FLUOR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

UNAUDITED

Consolidated Balance Sheet. Revenue in connection with O&M services including on-demand services will be recognized as earned through the life of the contract.

(8)                                  Net periodic pension expense for defined benefit pension plans includes the following components:

The company currently expects to fund approximately $55 million to $75 million during 2007. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, contributions of approximately $54 million were made by the company.

Net periodic postretirement benefit cost includes the following components:

The preceding information does not include amounts related to benefit plans applicable to employees associated with certain contracts with the U.S. Department of Energy because the company is not responsible for the current or future funded status of these plans.

(9)           Restricted stock awards totaling 196,831 shares and 271,000 shares were granted in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, at weighted-average per share prices of $90 and $84, respectively, vesting over five years. During the nine months ended 2007 and 2006, options for the purchase of 421,820 shares at a weighted average price of $89 per share and 260,000 shares at a weighted-average price of $84 per share, respectively, were awarded, with annual vesting of 20 percent. The contractual lives of 2007 awards are consistent with those of prior years.

(10)         The company and certain of its subsidiaries are involved in litigation in the ordinary course of business. The company and certain of its subsidiaries are contingently liable for commitments and performance guarantees arising in the ordinary course of business. Clients have made claims arising from engineering and construction contracts against the company, and the company has made claims against clients for cost incurred in excess of the current contract provisions. The company recognizes certain significant claims for recovery of incurred costs when it is probable that the claim will result in additional contract revenue and when the amount of the claim can be reliably

9

FLUOR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

UNAUDITED

estimated. Recognized claims against clients amounted to $234 million and $200 million at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, and are included in contract work in progress in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Amounts ultimately realized from claims could differ materially from the balances included in the financial statements. The company does not expect that claim recoveries will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

As of September 30, 2007, several matters on certain completed and in-progress projects are in the litigation and dispute resolution process. The following discussion provides a background and current status of certain of these matters:

Infrastructure Joint Venture Project

The company participates in a 50/50 joint venture that is executing a fixed-price transportation infrastructure project in California. The project continues to be subject to circumstances including owner-directed scope changes leading to quantity growth, cost escalation, additional labor and schedule delays, resulting in additional cost. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, provisions of $4.7 million and $16 million, respectively, were recognized due to increasing estimated cost. A charge totaling $28 million was recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The company continues to evaluate the impact of these circumstances on estimated total project cost, as well as claims for recoveries and other contingencies on the project. To date, the joint venture has submitted claims totaling approximately $155 million to the client. Cost of $95.6 million has been incurred by the joint venture relating to these claims as of September 30, 2007 and the company has recognized its $47.8 million proportionate share of this cost in revenue. The project is expected to be open for traffic in the fourth quarter of 2007.

The customer has recently begun to withhold liquidated damages from amounts otherwise due the joint venture. The company believes that any amounts that are withheld for liquidated damages will ultimately be recovered by the joint venture and has therefore not recognized any reduction in project revenue because of the withholdings.

London Connect Project

The company is involved in arbitration proceedings in connection with its London Connect Project, a $500 million lump sum project to design and install a telecommunications network that allows reception and transmissions throughout the London Underground system. In February 2005, the company sought relief through arbitration proceedings for two issues. First, the company is seeking relief for the overall delay and disruption to the project. The arbitration hearings on the claim that relates to the contract time period of 2001 through 2003 have been held and an interim decision from the arbitrator was received in December 2006. A claim for delay and disruption for the 2004 through 2005 time period has been submitted to the dispute resolution process. Reflecting the interim outcome for 2001 through 2003, the company has recognized $106.8 million in claims revenue relating to incurred cost attributed to the delay and disruption claims. In addition, the company was assessed and has paid $54 million representing its share of liquidated damages. This payment has not been recognized as a reduction in project revenue because it is expected that amounts assessed will be substantially recovered upon resolution of the company’s claims. The second issue concerns the responsibility for enabling the various train stock to accept the new telecommunication network equipment. The hearings on this issue have concluded and resulted in sustaining the company’s position that it did not have any responsibility for cost associated with this portion of the work under the contract.

Embassy Projects

The company has been performing work on 11 embassy projects for the United States Department of State under fixed-price contracts over the last four years. These projects have been adversely

10

FLUOR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

UNAUDITED

impacted by higher cost due to schedule extensions, scope changes causing material deviations from the Standard Embassy Design, site conditions at certain locations, subcontractor difficulties and the availability and productivity of construction labor. As of December 31, 2006, nine of the embassies were completed and occupied. The project in Greece was completed in the second quarter of 2007 and, as of September 30, 2007, the physical completion of the Haiti embassy has progressed to approximately 86 percent.

Claims for equitable adjustment totaling approximately $53 million on three of the projects have been submitted or identified to date. As the first formal step in dispute resolution, the majority of these claims have now been certified in accordance with federal contracting requirements. As of September 30, 2007, $46.8 million in cost relating to these claims has been incurred and recognized in revenue. During the third quarter of 2007, claims on one project were settled for approximately the recognized amount. During the first quarter of 2007, claims for recovery of cost associated with requirements for additional security-cleared labor on three of the embassies were settled. Additional claims continue to be evaluated.

Fluor Daniel International and Fluor Arabia Ltd. v. General Electric Company, et al

In October 1998, Fluor Daniel International and Fluor Arabia Ltd. filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against General Electric Company and certain operating subsidiaries as well as Saudi American General Electric, a Saudi Arabian corporation. The complaint seeks damages in connection with the procurement, engineering and construction of the Rabigh Combined Cycle Power Plant in Saudi Arabia. Subsequent to a motion to compel arbitration of the matter, the company initiated arbitration proceedings in New York under the American Arbitration Association international rules. The evidentiary phase of the arbitration has been concluded. In January 2005 the arbitration panel indicated that it would be rendering its decision in two phases; the first to be a decision on entitlement and second, a decision on damages. On May 4, 2005 the arbitration panel issued a partial award on entitlement issues which confirmed Fluor’s entitlement to recovery of certain of its claims for costs incurred in construction of the plant. On April 10, 2007, the arbitration panel issued a partial final award stipulating the amount of entitlement to recovery of certain claims and awarding interest on the net amounts due Fluor. The company does not expect that the final resolution of the arbitration will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Conex International v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc.

In November 2006, a Jefferson County, Texas, jury reached an unexpected verdict in the case of Conex International (“Conex”) v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc. (“FEI”), ruling in favor of Conex and awarded $98.8 million in damages related to a 2001 construction project.

In 2001, Atofina (now part of Total Petrochemicals Inc.) hired Conex International to be the mechanical contractor on a project at Atofina’s refinery in Port Arthur, Texas. FEI was also hired to provide certain engineering advice to Atofina on the project. There was no contract between Conex and FEI. Later in 2001 after the project was complete, Conex and Atofina negotiated a final settlement for extra work on the project. Conex sued FEI in September 2003 alleging damages for interference and misrepresentation and demanding that FEI should pay Conex the balance of the extra work charges that Atofina did not pay in the settlement. Conex also asserted that FEI interfered with Conex’s contract and business relationship with Atofina. The jury verdict included damages for the extra work and the alleged interference.

The company has appealed the decision and believes, based on the advice of counsel, that it is probable that the judgment based on this verdict will be overturned. The company strongly believes that the judgment based on this verdict is supported neither by the facts nor the law, and will pursue all possible avenues for reconsideration or appeal. Accordingly, the company has not recognized a charge reflecting the verdict amount.

11

FLUOR CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

UNAUDITED

(11)         In the ordinary course of business, the company enters into various agreements providing financial or performance assurances to clients on behalf of certain unconsolidated partnerships, joint ventures and other jointly executed contracts. These agreements are entered into primarily to support the project execution commitments of these entities. The guarantees have various expiration dates ranging from mechanical completion of the facilities being constructed to a period extending beyond contract completion in certain circumstances. The maximum potential payment amount of an outstanding performance guarantee is the remaining cost of work to be performed by or on behalf of third parties under engineering and construction contracts. Amounts that may be required to be paid in excess of estimated costs to complete contracts in progress are not estimable. For cost reimbursable contracts, amounts that may become payable pursuant to guarantee provisions are normally recoverable from the client for work performed under the contract. For lump sum or fixed price contracts, this amount is the cost to complete the contracted work less amounts remaining to be billed to the client under the contract. Remaining billable amounts could be greater or less than the cost to complete. In those cases where costs exceed the remaining amounts payable under the contract the company may have recourse to third parties, such as owners, co-venturers, subcontractors or vendors for claims. As of September 30, 2007, no material changes to the amount of financial or performance guarantees outstanding have occurred since the filing of the company’s December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K.

Financial guarantees, made in the ordinary course of business on behalf of clients and others in certain limited circumstances, are entered into with financial institutions and other credit grantors and generally obligate the company to make payment in the event of a default by the borrower. Most arrangements require the borrower to pledge collateral in the form of property, plant and equipment which is deemed adequate to recover amounts the company might be required to pay. As of September 30, 2007, no material changes to financial guarantees of the debt of third parties had occurred since the filing of the company’s December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K and the carrying value of recorded guarantee obligations was not significant as of either of those dates.

12

FLUOR CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis is provided to increase understanding of, and should be read in conjunction with, the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes and the company’s December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K. For purposes of reviewing this document, “operating profit” is calculated as revenue less cost of revenue.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements made herein, including statements regarding the company’s projected revenue and earnings levels, new awards and backlog levels and the implementation of strategic initiatives and organizational changes are forward-looking in nature. These forward-looking statements reflect current analysis of existing information and are subject to various risks and uncertainties. As a result, caution must be exercised in relying on forward-looking statements. Due to known and unknown risks, the company’s actual results may differ materially from its expectations or projections. Factors potentially contributing to such differences include, among others:

•      Difficulties or delays incurred in the execution of construction contracts, including performance by our joint venture or teaming partners, resulting in cost overruns or liabilities;

•      Failure to meet timely completion or performance standards that could result in higher cost and reduced profits or, in some cases losses on projects;

•      A failure to obtain favorable results in existing or future litigation or dispute resolution proceedings;

•      The company’s ability to hire and retain qualified personnel;

•      Customer cancellations of, or scope adjustments to, existing contracts, including our government contracts that may be terminated at any time;

•      The company’s failure to receive anticipated new contract awards and the related impacts on staffing levels and cost;

•      The cyclical nature of many of the markets the company serves and its vulnerability to downturns;

•      Competition in the global engineering, procurement and construction industry;

•      Changes in global business, economic (including currency risk), political and social conditions;

•      Civil unrest, security issues, labor conditions and other unforeseeable events in the countries in which we do business, resulting in unanticipated losses on fixed price projects;

•      Decreased capital investment or expenditures, or a failure to make anticipated increased capital investment or expenditures, by the company’s clients.

•      The potential impact of certain tax matters including, but not limited to, those from foreign operations and the ongoing audits by tax authorities and those resulting from the company’s reverse spin-off transaction involving our former coal segment;

•      The impact of past and future environmental, health and safety regulations;

•      Customer delays or defaults in making payments;

•      The availability of credit and restrictions imposed by credit facilities;

•      Possible limitations of bonding capacity;

•      The company’s ability to identify and successfully integrate acquisitions;

•      Restrictions on possible transactions imposed by Delaware law; and

•      Limitations on cash transfers from subsidiaries that may restrict the company’s ability to satisfy financial obligations or to pay interest or principal when due on outstanding debt.

While most risks affect only future cost or revenue anticipated by the company, some risks may relate to accruals that have already been reflected in earnings. The company’s failure to receive payments of accrued amounts or incurrence of liabilities in excess of amounts previously recognized, could result in a charge against future earnings.

Additional information concerning these and other factors can be found in our press releases as well as our periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the discussion under the heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the company’s Form 10-K filed March 1, 2007. These filings are available publicly on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov, on Fluor’s website at http://investor.fluor.com or upon request from Fluor’s Investor Relations Department: (469) 398-7220. The company disclaims any intent or obligation to update its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

13

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net earnings in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 were $93.7 million, or $1.02 per diluted share, and $273.9 million, or $3.01 per diluted share, respectively. These results compare with net earnings of $27.3 million, or $0.31 per diluted share, and $182.7 million, or $2.05 per diluted share, respectively, for the corresponding periods of 2006. Earnings before taxes in the third quarter of 2007 include a provision of $20.9 million in the Government segment on a fixed-priced project. In addition, earnings include provisions totaling $4.7 million and $16.0 million in the Industrial & Infrastructure segment in the 2007 three and nine month periods, respectively, relating to a fixed price transportation infrastructure joint venture project in California.

Earnings for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 were significantly impacted by provisions totaling $168 million on fixed-price projects in the Government and Industrial & Infrastructure segments. Provisions for losses on certain fixed-price embassy projects totaling $133 million and $154 million were recognized in the three and nine months of 2006, respectively. In addition to the provisions on the embassy projects, provisions totaling $13 million and $29 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, were recognized on a project in Afghanistan. See further discussion of the embassy and Afghanistan provisions under Government below. Results also include provisions totaling $22 million and $27 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 for a fixed price transportation infrastructure joint venture project in California. See further discussion of the transportation project under Industrial & Infrastructure below.

Consolidated revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $4.1 billion and $12.0 billion, respectively, compared with $3.4 billion and $10.4 billion for the corresponding periods in 2006. A significant decline in revenue of the Government segment has been more than offset by increases in revenue from all of the other segments.

The effective tax rates, based on the company’s actual operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 were approximately 39.7 percent and 37.1 percent, respectively. A tax benefit totaling $13.5 million was recognized in the three months ended September 30, 2006 reflecting the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards and an increase in the extraterritorial income exclusion and the domestic production activities deduction. These factors reduced the effective tax rate to 30.6 percent, based on the company’s actual operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

Consolidated new awards for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 were $6.0 billion and $16.3 billion, respectively, compared with $4.8 billion and $14.4 billion in the corresponding 2006 periods. The Oil & Gas, Global Services and Power segments had increases in new awards, partially offset by decreases in new awards in the Industrial & Infrastructure and Government segments. Approximately 60 percent of consolidated new awards for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were for projects located outside of the United States.

Consolidated backlog at September 30, 2007 of $27.9 billion was approximately 41 percent higher compared with backlog at September 30, 2006 and approximately 27 percent higher than backlog at the end of 2006. As of September 30, 2007, approximately 59 percent of consolidated backlog relates to projects located outside of the United States. Although backlog reflects business which is considered to be firm, cancellations or scope adjustments may occur. Backlog is adjusted to reflect any known project cancellations, deferrals and revised project scope and cost, both upward and downward.

14

OIL & GAS

Revenue and operating profit for the Oil & Gas segment are summarized as follows:

Revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared with the corresponding periods in 2006 has increased as the result of higher project execution activities on major projects awarded over the last two years. The current year revenue growth has been accompanied by substantial operating profit increases. Operating profit margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 was 5.1 percent and 5.0 percent, respectively, compared with 6.3 percent and 5.7 percent in the corresponding 2006 periods. Margins have declined during 2007 as a number of large projects transition from engineering to construction. Although the construction phase of a project typically reflects higher dollar amounts of revenue and operating profit, the margin percentages are generally lower than the engineering phase.

New awards for the three months ended September 30, 2007 were $4.3 billion, compared with $2.9 billion for the same period in 2006. New awards during the 2007 period include $2.0 billion for a major refinery project in the Middle East. New awards during the third quarter of 2006 included a new $2.2 billion project in Saudi Arabia. Backlog at September 30, 2007 increased by 63 percent to $16.4 billion compared with $10.1 billion at September 30, 2006.

Total assets in the Oil and Gas segment increased to $753 million at September 30, 2007 from $629 million at December 31, 2006 primarily due to the increased level of project execution activities.

INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE

Revenue and operating profit for the Industrial & Infrastructure segment are summarized as follows:

Revenue in the three months ended September 30, 2007 declined 8 percent compared with the same period in 2006 reflecting a modest reduction in overall project activity. Nine month 2007 revenue was essentially flat compared with the same period in 2006. Operating profit and margin percentages have increased during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 compared with the same periods in 2006, largely on the strength of mining project performance and lower charges associated with the transportation infrastructure project discussed below. Operating profit for the segment during the 2007 periods include the impact of provisions totaling $4.7 million and $16.0 million for a fixed price transportation infrastructure project in California. Provisions totaling $22 million and $27 million were recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, relating to the project. The contract, which is being executed by a 50/50 joint venture in which the company participates, continues to be subject to circumstances including owner-directed scope changes leading to quantity growth, cost escalation, additional labor and schedule delays, resulting in additional cost and claims against the client.

15

New awards for the three months ended September 30, 2007 were $364 million compared with $743 million for the 2006 comparison period. New awards during the current and prior year have been concentrated in the mining sector. Backlog decreased slightly to $5.2 billion at September 30, 2007 compared with $5.3 billion at September 30, 2006.

Total assets in the Industrial & Infrastructure segment increased to $829 million at September 30, 2007 from $686 million at December 31, 2006 primarily related to the build out of the National Roads Telecommunications Services project as discussed below.

GOVERNMENT

Revenue and operating profit for the Government segment are summarized as follows:

As expected, a substantial decrease in revenue and operating profit occurred in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared with the same periods in the prior year. This was primarily the result of the significant contributions from Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”) hurricane relief and Iraq reconstruction work, as well as the Fernald environmental project, during the 2006 periods. The Fernald contract is substantially complete and the volume of Iraq and FEMA task orders has been significantly lower in 2007. Operating profit in the three months ended September 30, 2007 includes a provision of $20.9 million on a fixed-priced project at the Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan relating to subcontractor execution and quality control issues and liquidated damages due to the resulting delay in project completion. Provisions totaling $13 million and $29 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 were recognized on this project primarily due to subcontractor performance and quality issues. Operating profit in 2006 was also adversely impacted by provisions on certain embassy projects for the United States Department of State. Provisions on the embassy projects totaled $133 million and $154 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively.

New awards of $708 million in the three months ended September 30, 2007 compares with $731 million during the 2006 period. Backlog at September 30, 2007 decreased to $839 million from $928 million at the end of the third quarter of 2006.

Total assets in the Government segment decreased to $321 million at September 30, 2007 from $597 million at December 31, 2006 due to the billing and collection of substantially all of the previously unbilled fees on the Fernald project and progress towards completion on the FEMA and Iraq reconstruction contracts.

GLOBAL SERVICES

Revenue and operating profit for the Global Services segment are summarized as follows:

16

Revenue and operating profit increased significantly during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared with the same periods in 2006, reflecting continued growth across the segment’s various service lines. The operating profit and margin was favorably impacted during 2006 primarily due to hurricane recovery support activities.

New awards and backlog for Global Services reflect operations and maintenance activities only. The equipment, temporary staffing and global procurement operations do not report backlog due to the short turnaround between the receipt of new awards and the recognition of revenue. New awards for the three months ended September 30, 2007 were $540 million compared with $221 million for the 2006 comparison period. Current quarter new awards include new work and renewals for two key clients. Backlog for Global Services at September 30, 2007 was $2.7 billion, up from $2.4 billion at September 30, 2006 reflecting improved new awards over the last 12 months.

POWER

Revenue and operating profit for the Power segment are summarized as follows: