Edgar Filing: CEVA INC

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2012

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 000-49842

CEVA, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


Delaware		77-0556376
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1943 Landings Drive, Mountain View, California		94043
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(650) 417-7900

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: 22,586,653 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, as of August 3, 2012.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Interim Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011		5

	Interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (unaudited) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011		6

	Interim Condensed Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited) for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011		7

	Interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the Six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011		8

	Notes to the Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		9

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		17

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		24

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		25

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		25

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		25

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities And Use Of Proceeds		34

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		34

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		34

Item 5.	Other Information		34

Item 6.	Exhibits		34

SIGNATURES			35

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INDUSTRY DATA

This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that if they materialize or prove incorrect, could cause the results of CEVA to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and assumptions. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are generally written in the future tense and/or are preceded by words such as “will,” “may,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “suggest,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” or other similar words. Forward-looking statements include the following:

•

Our belief that the full scale migration to our DSP cores and technologies in the handsets and mobile broadband markets continues to progress;

•

Our belief that the emergence of merchant 3G cellular chips from companies such as Broadcom, Intel and Spreadtrum, all of whom are our customers, are strong positive drivers for our future market share expansion;

•

Our belief that we are well positioned to leverage the growth in the 3G enabled phones in developing countries and the broad adoption of 4G LTE-based advanced smartphones in market markets;

•

Our belief that we are well-positioned to capitalize on the growth in the mobile connected devices and machine 2 machine markets;

•

Our belief that our audio/voice product lines enable us to continue to expand our licensing base in the audio & voice market;

•

Our belief that the following four market trends represent significant growth drivers for us: (1) evolution of cellular networks, (2) emergence of 3G and 4G connectivity, (3) mass adoption and feature set enhancements of smartphones, and (4) proliferation of smart devices in the home;

•

Our anticipation that certain market trends would cause revenues for the third quarter of 2012 to be lower than the first and second quarters of 2012 and that these trends may result in our 2012 annual revenues to be lower than our 2011 annual revenues;

•

Our belief that in the fourth quarter of 2012 we may return to a royalty revenue sequential increase after a few quarters of sequential revenue declines;

•

Our belief that the penetration of handsets, especially low-cost phones, in emerging markets, such as India, Latin America and Africa, could generate future growth potential for our business;

•

Our anticipation that our operating expenses will be lower in 2012 in comparison to 2011;

iii

•

Our anticipation that our current cash on hand, short-term deposits and marketable securities, along with cash from operations, will provide sufficient capital to fund our operations for at least the next 12 months;

•

Our belief that changes in interest rates within our investment portfolio will not have a material effect on our financial position on an annual or quarterly basis; and

•

Market data prepared by third parties, including Gartner Research and Strategy Analytics.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements contained in this report are based on information that is currently available to us and expectations and assumptions that we deem reasonable at the time the statements were made. We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements in this report or in any of our other communications, except as required by law. All such forward-looking statements should be read as of the time the statements were made and with the recognition that these forward-looking statements may not be complete or accurate at a later date.

Many factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this report. These factors include, but are not limited to, those risks set forth in Part II – Item 1A – “Risk Factors” of this Form 10-Q.

This report contains market data prepared by third party research firm, Gartner Research and Strategy Analytics. Actual market results may differ from their projections.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data


	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
	Unaudited			Audited
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	20,507		$	14,954
Short term bank deposits		61,610			55,431
Marketable securities (see Note 3)		54,531			69,027
Trade receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $25 at both June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011)		4,702			5,116
Deferred tax assets		2,015			2,248
Prepaid expenses and other accounts receivable		2,468			2,320

Total current assets		145,833			149,096

Long term bank deposit		19,321			25,106
Severance pay fund		5,645			5,473
Deferred tax assets		1,063			832
Property and equipment, net		1,177			1,235
Goodwill		36,498			36,498
Investment in other company		900			900

Total long-term assets		64,604			70,044

Total assets	$	210,437		$	219,140


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Trade payables	$	1,006		$	580
Deferred revenues		1,032			1,074
Accrued expenses and other payables		8,077			10,124
Income taxes payable, net		1,542			545
Deferred tax liabilities		94			290

Total current liabilities		11,751			12,613


Long term liabilities:
Accrued severance pay		5,697			5,607

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred Stock:
$0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding		—			—
Common Stock:
$0.001 par value: 60,000,000 shares authorized; 22,538,937 and 23,543,746 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively		23			24
Additional paid in-capital		195,814			191,945
Treasury stock		(20,556	)		—
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(324	)		(901	)
Retained earnings		18,032			9,852

Total stockholders’ equity		192,989			200,920

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	210,437		$	219,140

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)

U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share data


	Six months ended June 30,				Three months ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Revenues:
Licensing	$	10,480	$	10,303	$	5,364	$	5,195
Royalties		16,701		17,478		7,595		8,272
Other revenue		1,523		1,659		633		921

Total revenues		28,704		29,440		13,592		14,388
Cost of revenues		1,881		1,824		1,011		876

Gross profit		26,823		27,616		12,581		13,512
Operating expenses:
Research and development, net		10,911		10,655		5,425		5,405
Sales and marketing		4,393		4,551		2,104		2,327
General and administrative		3,718		3,486		1,849		1,732

Total operating expenses		19,022		18,692		9,378		9,464

Operating income		7,801		8,924		3,203		4,048
Financial income, net		1,922		1,252		974		707

Income before taxes on income		9,723		10,176		4,177		4,755
Income taxes		1,387		1,402		698		632

Net income	$	8,336	$	8,774	$	3,479	$	4,123


Basic net income per share	$	0.36	$	0.38	$	0.15	$	0.18

Diluted net income per share	$	0.35	$	0.37	$	0.15	$	0.17

Weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock used in computation of net income per share (in thousands):
Basic		23,188		22,900		22,873		23,107

Diluted		23,842		24,028		23,449		24,165


Comprehensive income	$	8,913	$	8,896	$	3,052	$	4,133

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

INTERIM CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

U.S. dollars in thousands, except share data


	Common stock						Additional paid-in capital					Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)						Total stockholders’ equity
Six months ended June 30, 2012	Shares			Amount			Additional paid-in capital		Treasury stock			Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)			Retained earnings			Total stockholders’ equity
Balance as of January 1, 2012		23,543,746		$	24		$	191,945	$	—		$	(901	)	$	9,852		$	200,920
Net income		—			—			—		—			—			8,336			8,336
Unrealized gain from available-for-sale securities, net		—			—			—		—			501			—			501
Unrealized gain from hedging activities, net		—			—			—		—			76			—			76
Equity-based compensation		—			—			2,322		—			—			—			2,322
Tax benefit related to exercise of stock options		—			—			752		—			—			—			752
Issuance of Common Stock upon exercise of stock options		17,448			(*	)		166		—			—			—			166
Issuance of Common Stock under employee stock purchase plan		33,966			(*	)		629		—			—			—			629
Purchase of Treasury Stock		(1,066,742	)		(1	)		—		(20,792	)		—			—			(20,793	)
Issuance of Treasury Stock upon exercise of stock options		10,519			(*	)		—		236			—			(156	)		80

Balance as of June 30, 2012		22,538,937		$	23		$	195,814	$	(20,556	)	$	(324	)	$	18,032		$	192,989


	Common stock					Additional paid-in capital		Accumulated other comprehensive income			Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
Six months ended June 30, 2011	Shares		Amount			Additional paid-in capital		Accumulated other comprehensive income			Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)			Total stockholders’ equity
Balance as of January 1, 2011		22,524,449	$	23		$	176,838	$	317		$	(8,710	)	$	168,468
Net income		—		—			—		—			8,774			8,774
Unrealized gain from available-for-sale securities, net		—		—			—		146			—			146
Unrealized loss from hedging activities, net		—		—			—		(24	)		—			(24	)
Equity-based compensation		—		—			2,125		—			—			2,125
Tax benefit related to exercise of stock options		—		—			1,779		—			—			1,779
Issuance of Common Stock upon exercise of stock options		727,003		(*	)		6,046		—			—			6,046
Issuance of Common Stock under employee stock purchase plan		95,252		(*	)		590		—			—			590

Balance as of June 30, 2011		23,346,704	$	23		$	187,378	$	439		$	64		$	187,904

(*)	Amount less than $1.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

U.S. dollars in thousands


	Six months ended June 30,
	2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	8,336		$	8,774
Adjustments required to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		259			253
Equity-based compensation		2,322			2,125
Gain from sale of property and equipment		—			(10	)
Realized gain on sale of available-for-sale marketable securities		(127	)		(7	)
Amortization of premiums on available-for-sale marketable securities		709			1,045
Accrued interest on bank deposits		(910	)		(457	)
Unrealized foreign exchange loss (gain)		(57	)		44
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease in trade receivables		414			2,284
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other accounts receivable		600			1,184
Increase in deferred taxes, net		(415	)		(1,693	)
Increase in trade payables		444			226
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenues		(42	)		3,030
Decrease in accrued expenses and other payables		(1,849	)		(1,651	)
Increase in income taxes payable		997			445
Excess tax benefit from equity-based compensation		(752	)		(1,779	)
Decrease in accrued severance pay, net		(78	)		(11	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		9,851			13,802

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		(201	)		(213	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		—			10
Investment in bank deposits		(28,604	)		(22,500	)
Proceeds from bank deposits		29,073			5,065
Investment in available-for-sale marketable securities		(20,367	)		(27,600	)
Proceeds from maturity of available-for-sale marketable securities		9,150			16,477
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale marketable securities		25,845			3,998

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		14,896			(24,763	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Purchase of Treasury Stock		(20,793	)		—
Proceeds from issuance of Common Stock upon exercise of stock options		166			6,046
Proceeds from issuance of Common Stock under employee stock purchase plan		629			590
Proceeds from issuance of Treasury Stock upon exercise of stock options		80			—
Excess tax benefit from equity-based compensation		752			1,779

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(19,166	)		8,415
Effect of exchange rate movements on cash		(28	)		(173	)

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		5,553			(2,719	)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period		14,954			17,098

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period	$	20,507		$	14,379

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

NOTE 1: BUSINESS

The financial information in this quarterly report includes the results of CEVA, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company” or “CEVA”).

CEVA licenses a family of programmable DSP cores and application-specific platforms, including communications (wireless, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth), vision and image signal processing, audio & voice, Serial ATA (SATA) and Serial Attached SCSI (SAS).

CEVA’s technologies are licensed to leading semiconductor and original equipment manufacturer (OEM) companies in the form of intellectual property (IP). These companies design, manufacture, market and sell application-specific integrated circuits (“ASICs”) and application-specific standard products (“ASSPs”) based on CEVA’s technology to OEM companies for incorporation into a wide variety of end products.

NOTE 2: BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Consolidation

The interim condensed consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of the Company and all of its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.

Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012. For further information, reference is made to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

The significant accounting policies applied in the annual consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2011, contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2012, have been applied consistently in these unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of interim condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates estimates, including those related to the accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts, fair values of financial instruments, fair values of stock-based awards and income taxes, among others. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities.

NOTE 3: MARKETABLE SECURITIES

The following is a summary of available-for-sale marketable securities at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


	As at June 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Fair value
Available-for-sale securities - matures within one year:
Corporate bonds	$	15,741	$	46	$	(38	)	$	15,749

		15,741		46		(38	)		15,749
Available-for-sale securities - matures after one year through three years:
Certificates of deposits		1,960		—		(1	)		1,959
Foreign government bond		583		—		(2	)		581
Corporate bonds		36,532		73		(363	)		36,242

		39,075		73		(366	)		38,782

Total	$	54,816	$	119	$	(404	)	$	54,531


	As at December 31, 2011 (Audited)
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Fair value
Available-for-sale securities - matures within one year:
Corporate bonds	$	22,204	$	16	$	(115	)	$	22,105

		22,204		16		(115	)		22,105
Available-for-sale securities - matures after one year through three years:
Certificates of deposits		2,206		—		(2	)		2,204
Foreign government bond		592		—		(3	)		589
Corporate bonds		45,024		84		(979	)		44,129

		47,822		84		(984	)		46,922

Total	$	70,026	$	100	$	(1,099	)	$	69,027

The following table presents gross unrealized losses and fair values for those investments that were in an unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and the length of time that those investments have been in a continuous loss position:


	Less than 12 months					12 months or greater
	Fair Value		Gross unrealized loss			Fair Value		Gross unrealized loss
As of June 30, 2012	$	22,002	$	(219	)	$	9,443	$	(185	)
As of December 31, 2011	$	48,594	$	(923	)	$	5,476	$	(176	)

As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, management believes the impairments are not other than temporary and therefore the impairment losses were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The Company has no intent to sell these marketable securities and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell these marketable securities prior to the recovery of the entire amortized cost basis.

NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized gross realized gains of $111 and $16, respectively, and gross realized losses of $29 and $6, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized gross realized gains of $163 and $17, respectively, and gross realized losses of $36 and $10, respectively.

NOTE 4: FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

The Company measures its marketable securities and foreign currency derivative contracts at fair value. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received for selling an asset or paid for the transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. A three-tier fair value hierarchy is established as a basis for considering such assumptions and for inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value:


Level 1		Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible on the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2		Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and

Level 3		Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).

Marketable securities and foreign currency derivative contracts are classified within Level 2 as the valuation inputs are based on quoted prices and market observable data of similar instruments.

The table below sets forth the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.


Description	June 30, 2012		Level I		Level II		Level III
Assets:
Marketable securities:
Certificates of deposits	$	1,959	$	—	$	1,959	$	—
Foreign government bond		581		—		581		—
Corporate bonds		51,991		—		51,991		—
Foreign exchange contracts		22		—		22		—

Total assets		54,553		—		54,553		—


Liabilities:
Foreign exchange contracts		141		—		141		—

Total liabilities		141		—		141		—


Description	December 31, 2011		Level I		Level II		Level III
Assets:
Marketable securities:
Certificates of deposits	$	2,204	$	—	$	2,204	$	—
Foreign government bond		589		—		589		—
Corporate bonds		66,234		—		66,234		—

Total assets		69,027		—		69,027		—


Liabilities:
Foreign exchange contracts		225		—		225		—

Total liabilities		225		—		225		—

NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

In addition to the assets and liabilities described above, the Company’s financial instruments also include cash, cash equivalents, short term bank deposits, trade receivables, other accounts receivable, trade payables, income taxes payable and other accounts payables. The fair values of these financial instruments were not materially different from their carrying values at June 30, 2012 due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.

NOTE 5: GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION AND MAJOR CUSTOMER DATA

a. Summary information about geographic areas:

The Company manages its business on the basis of one reportable segment: the licensing of intellectual property to semiconductor companies and electronic equipment manufacturers (see Note 1 for a brief description of the Company’s business). The following is a summary of revenues within geographic areas:


	Six months ended June 30,						Three months ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)			(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Revenues based on customer location:
United States	$	6,177		$	6,552		$	3,179		$	3,376
Europe and Middle East (1) (2)		7,090			11,305			3,412			3,840
Asia Pacific (3) (4) (5)		15,437			11,583			7,001			7,172

	$	28,704		$	29,440		$	13,592		$	14,388


(1) Germany	$	3,399		$	7,743		$	1,606		$	2,177
(2) Switzerland		*	)	$	3,112			*	)		*	)
(3) Japan	$	3,140			*	)		*	)		*	)
(4) China	$	9,294		$	6,336		$	4,056		$	3,556
(5) S. Korea		*	)		*	)	$	1,619			*	)

*)	Less than 10%

b. Major customer data as a percentage of total revenues:

The following table sets forth the customers that represented 10% or more of the Company’s total revenues in each of the periods set forth below.


	Six months ended June 30,						Three months ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)			(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Customer A		28	%		14	%		25	%		12	%
Customer B		12	%		16	%		12	%		*	)
Customer C		12	%		*	)		15	%		*	)
Customer D		*	)		*	)		12	%		*	)
Customer E		—			10	%		—			*	)
Customer F		*	)		10	%		*	)		*	)

*)	Less than 10%

NOTE 6: NET INCOME PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK

Basic net income per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted net income per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding

NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

during each period, plus dilutive potential shares of common stock considered outstanding during the period, in accordance with FASB ASC No. 260, “Earnings Per Share.”


	Six months ended June 30,				Three months ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Numerator:
Net income	$	8,336	$	8,774	$	3,479	$	4,123

Denominator:
Weighted-average common stock outstanding		23,188		22,900		22,873		23,107
Effect of stock options		654		1,128		576		1,058

Diluted weighted average common stock outstanding		23,842		24,028		23,449		24,165


Basic net income per share	$	0.36	$	0.38	$	0.15	$	0.18

Diluted net income per share	$	0.35	$	0.37	$	0.15	$	0.17

The weighted average number of shares related to outstanding options excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per share, since their effect was anti-dilutive, was 764,861 and 1,212,482 shares for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, and 557,800 and 461,299 shares for the corresponding periods of 2011.

NOTE 7: COMMON STOCK AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS

The Company grants stock options to employees and non-employee directors of the Company and its subsidiaries and provides the right to purchase common stock pursuant to the Company’s 2002 employee stock purchase plan to employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. The options granted under these plans have been granted at the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. A summary of the Company’s stock option activity and related information for the three months ended June 30, 2012, are as follows:


	Number of options			Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average remaining contractual term		Aggregate intrinsic- value
Outstanding as of March 31, 2012		1,864,858		$	15.79
Granted		165,000			17.38
Exercised		(7,615	)		8.06
Forfeited or expired		(3,447	)		23.79

Outstanding as of June 30, 2012		2,018,796		$	15.93		4.9	$	3,383,254

Exercisable as of June 30, 2012		1,134,037		$	11.84		3.7	$	6,548,109

NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

The following table shows the total equity-based compensation expense included in the interim condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income:


	Six months ended June 30,				Three months ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Cost of revenue	$	104	$	110	$	53	$	61
Research and development, net		859		862		394		484
Sales and marketing		439		456		200		255
General and administrative		920		697		430		371

Total equity-based compensation expense	$	2,322	$	2,125	$	1,077	$	1,171

The fair value for the Company’s stock options granted to employees and non-employees directors was estimated using the following assumptions:


	Three months ended June 30,
	2012			2011
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Expected dividend yield		0	%		0	%
Expected volatility		47%-58	%		39%-56	%
Risk-free interest rate		0.2%-1.2	%		0.2%-2.5	%
Expected forfeiture (employees)		10	%		10	%
Expected forfeiture (executives)		5	%		5	%
Contractual term of up to		10 Years			10 Years
Suboptimal exercise multiple (employees)		2.1			2.0
Suboptimal exercise multiple (executives)		2.4			2.3

The Company did not grant new purchase rights under the 2002 employee stock purchase plan during the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

As of June 30, 2012, there was $4,448 of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested awards. This amount is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years. To the extent the actual forfeiture rate is different from what the Company has estimated, equity-based compensation related to these awards will be different from the Company’s expectations.

NOTE 8: DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

The Company implemented the requirements of FASB ASC No. 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” which requires companies to recognize all of their derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position at fair value. The accounting for changes in fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging transaction and further, on the type of hedging transaction. For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, a company must designate the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge, or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. Due to the Company’s global operations, it is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations in the normal course of its business. The Company’s treasury policy allows it to offset the risks associated with the effects of certain foreign currency exposures through the purchase of foreign exchange forward or option contracts (“Hedging Contracts”). The policy, however, prohibits the Company from speculating on such Hedging Contracts for profit. To protect against the increase in value of forecasted foreign currency cash flow resulting from salaries paid in currencies other than the U.S. dollar during the year, the Company instituted a foreign currency cash flow hedging program. The Company hedges portions of the anticipated payroll of its non-U.S. employees denominated in the currencies other than the U.S. dollar for a period of one to twelve months with Hedging Contracts. Accordingly, when the dollar strengthens against the foreign currencies, the decline in present value of future foreign currency expenses is offset by losses in the fair value of the Hedging Contracts. Conversely, when the dollar weakens, the increase in the present value of future foreign currency expenses is offset by gains in the fair value of the Hedging Contracts. These Hedging Contracts are designated as cash flow hedges.

NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge (i.e., hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk), the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Any gain or loss on a derivative instrument in excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item is recognized in current earnings during the period of change. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the notional principal amount of the Hedging Contracts to sell U.S. dollars held by the Company was $7,425 and $8,350, respectively.

Other derivative instruments that are not designated as hedging instruments consist of forward contracts that the Company uses to hedge monetary assets denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Gains and losses on these contracts as well as related costs are included in financial income, net, along with the gains and losses of the related hedged item. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the notional principal amount of the foreign exchange contracts to sell New Israeli Shekels (“NIS”) held by the Company was $2,496 and $0, respectively.

The fair value of the Company’s outstanding derivative instruments is as follows:


	As at June 30,		As at December 31,
	2012		2011
	(Unaudited)		(Audited)
Derivative assets:
Derivatives not qualified as hedging instruments:
Foreign exchange forward contracts	$	22	$	—

Total	$	22	$	—

Derivative liabilities:
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments:
Foreign exchange option contracts	$	100	$	143
Foreign exchange forward contracts		41		82

Total	$	141	$	225

The Company recorded the fair value of derivative assets in “prepaid expenses and other accounts receivable” and the fair value of derivative liabilities in “accrued expenses and other payables” on the Company’s interim condensed consolidated balance sheet.

The increase (decrease) in gains recognized in “accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” on derivatives, before tax effect, is as follows:


	Six months ended June 30,					Three months ended June 30,
	2012			2011		2012			2011
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)		(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments:
Foreign exchange option contracts	$	(38	)	$	155	$	(203	)	$	112
Foreign exchange forward contracts		(18	)		60		(69	)		13

	$	(56	)	$	215	$	(272	)	$	125

The gains (losses) reclassified from “accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” into income, are as follows:

NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


	Six months ended June 30,					Three months ended June 30,
	2012		2011			2012		2011
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)			(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments:
Foreign exchange option contracts	$	81	$	(228	)	$	49	$	(171	)
Foreign exchange forward contracts		59		(14	)		34		2

	$	140	$	(242	)	$	83	$	(169	)

The Company recorded in cost of revenues and operating expenses a net loss of $83 and $140 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, and a net gain of $169 and $242 for the comparable periods of 2011, related to its Hedging Contracts. In addition, the Company recorded in financial income, net, a gain of $22 for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, and a loss of $131 and $284 for the comparable periods of 2011, related to derivatives not qualified as hedging instruments.

NOTE 9: SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM

In January 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors reaffirmed its authorization for the repurchase by the Company of 1,966,700 shares of common stock pursuant to Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

During the first quarter of 2012, the Company repurchased 400,063 shares of common stock at an average purchase price of $23.83 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $9,535. During the second quarter of 2012, the Company repurchased 666,679 shares of common stock at an average purchase price of $16.89 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $11,258. The Company did not repurchase any shares of common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2011. As of June 30, 2012, 899,958 shares of common stock remained available for repurchase under its share repurchase program.

The repurchases of common stock are accounted for as treasury stock, and result in a reduction of stockholders’ equity. When treasury shares are reissued, the Company accounts for the reissuance in accordance with FASB ASC No. 505-30, “Treasury Stock” and charges the excess of the repurchase cost over issuance price using the weighted average method to retained earnings. The purchase cost is calculated based on the specific identified method. In the case where the repurchase cost over issuance price using the weighted average method is lower than the issuance price, the Company credits the difference to additional paid-in capital.

NOTE 10: RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

The Company adopted the following accounting guidance effective January 1, 2012:

According to Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05 “Presentation of Comprehensive Income,” the Company is required to present the total comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The Company has elected to present the comprehensive income in a single continuous statement which contains two sections, net earnings and comprehensive income.

Item 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion together with the unaudited financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this quarterly report may turn out to be wrong. These forward-looking statements can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Factors which could cause actual results to differ materially include those set forth under in Part II – Item 1A – “Risk Factors,” as well as those discussed elsewhere in this quarterly report. See “Forward-Looking Statements.”

BUSINESS OVERVIEW

The financial information presented in this quarterly report includes the results of CEVA, Inc. and its subsidiaries. CEVA is the world’s leading licensor of DSP cores and platform solutions. Our technologies are widely licensed and power many of the world’s leading semiconductor and original equipment manufacturer (OEM) companies. In 2011, our licensees shipped more than one billion CEVA-powered chipsets targeted for a wide range of diverse end markets. Shipments of CEVA-powered chipsets in 2011 increased 68% over 2010, illustrating continued, strong market deployment of our technology.

During the past six years, our business has shown profitability growth and market share expansion as a result of the widespread deployment of our DSP cores with all major handset OEMs – HTC, Huawei, LG Electronics, Motorola, Nokia, Samsung, Sony, ZTE and a major U.S.-based smartphone manufacturer. Based on internal data and Strategy Analytics’ worldwide shipment data, CEVA’s worldwide market share of cellular baseband chips that incorporate our technologies was approximately 43% of the worldwide shipment volume based on first quarter 2012 worldwide shipments. Revenues derived from the handsets and mobile broadband markets accounted for approximately 77% of our total revenues for 2011 and 79% for the first half of 2012. The mobile broadband space is a category of wireless-enabled products, among which are tablets, notebooks, electronic books, machine-to-machine devices, automotive applications and smart grids.

We believe the full scale migration to our DSP cores and technologies in the handsets and mobile broadband markets continues to progress. Specifically, we believe the emergence of merchant 3G cellular chips from companies such as Broadcom, Intel and Spreadtrum, all of whom are our customers, are strong positive drivers for our future market share expansion. Moreover, Strategy Analytics latest forecast estimates that worldwide cellular baseband shipments will grow by 4.87% in 2012 to reach 2.326 billion units. We believe that the majority of this growth will come from 3G enabled phones in developing countries and the broader adoption of 4G LTE-based advanced smartphones in mature markets. We are well positioned to capitalize on the growth in the above segments, as well as growth from other mobile connected devices such as tablets, electronic books and other machine–to-machine devices, as key chip suppliers serving these markets use our technologies broadly. During the second quarter of 2012, we signed new agreements for our DSPs targeting the 4G LTE market, bringing the total number of LTE design wins for our DSPs to more than 20. This includes the first design win for our new, best of breed communications DSP, the CEVA-XC4000.

Beyond products enabled by our technologies for baseband in handsets and mobile broadband markets, we continue to strategically target growth in non-baseband applications, such as audio & voice, imaging, vision and connectivity. Advanced audio and wideband voice processing requires significantly more DSP performance than existing solutions used in smartphones, automotive and digital home applications. Our audio/voice product lines, including the CEVA-TeakLite-III and new CEVA-TeakLite-4 DSPs, are ideally positioned to address these requirements, and can enable us to continue to expand our licensing base in these markets.

We believe the following four market trends represent significant growth drivers for the company:

•

The evolution of cellular networks, specifically the growth of 3G networks in emerging countries and the migration from 3G to LTE in developed countries. CEVA is well positioned to leverage these opportunities with a broad range of technologies and broad customer base.

•

The emergence of 3G and 4G connectivity in devices beyond handsets such as tablets, laptops, automotive and surveillance. Our range of baseband DSPs are ideal for these promising new segments.

•

The mass adoption and feature set enhancements of smartphones. We offer a range of new DSPs and software technologies to address the needs for advanced imaging audio and wideband voice. It is an incremental business to our already strong foothold in the baseband market.

•

The proliferation of smart devices in the home, including the emergence of smart-TVs smart set-top boxes and smart grid. We aim to leverage our mobile experience and technology base to expand into these markets.

Notwithstanding the various growth opportunities we have outlined above, our business operates in a highly competitive environment. Competition has historically increased pricing pressures for our products and decreased our average selling prices. Royalty payments under our existing license agreements also could be lower than currently anticipated for a variety of reasons, including decreased royalty rates triggered by larger volume shipments or lower royalty rates negotiated with customers due to competitive pressure. Moreover, some of our competitors have reduced their licensing and royalty fees to attract customers and expand their market share. In order to penetrate new markets and maintain our market share with our existing products, we may need to offer our products in the future at lower prices which may result in lower profits. In addition, our future growth is dependent not only on the continued success of our existing products but also the successful introduction of new products, which requires the dedication of resources into research and development which in turn may increase our operating expenses. Furthermore, since our products are incorporated into end products of our OEM customers, our business is very dependent on our OEM customers’ ability to achieve market acceptance of their end products in the handsets and consumer electronic markets, which are similarly very competitive. In addition, macroeconomic trends may significantly affect our operating results. For example, consolidation among our customers may negatively affect our revenue sources and increase our existing customers’ negotiation leverage. Also, since we derive a significant portion of our revenues from the handsets market, any negative trends in that market would adversely affect our financial results. According to Gartner Research, in the first quarter of 2012, sales of handsets to end-users declined 2% versus the first quarter of 2011. This was the first time since the second quarter of 2009 that the handsets market has contracted. This market downturn, which comes after 10 straight quarters of growth, is mainly due to the economic weakness in mature markets and slowing demand in the Asia Pacific region as consumers wait for new smartphone launches. Nonetheless, based on our shipment data, we managed to buck this global handsets market decline and expanded our shipment volumes by 2% versus 2011.

The ever-changing nature of the market also affects our continued business growth potential. For example, the success of our imaging and audio products is highly dependent on the market adoption of new services and products, such as smartphones, tablets, smart TVs and set-top boxes. The low cost 2G feature phone market continues to witness fierce competition, putting pressure on the royalty ASP that we receive from these high volume products. In addition, our business is affected by market conditions in emerging markets, such as India, Latin America and Africa, where the penetration of handsets, especially low-cost phones, could generate future growth potential for our business. The maintenance of our competitive position and our future growth also are dependent on our ability to adapt to ever-changing technologies, short product life cycles, evolving industry standards, changing customer needs and the trend towards cellular connectivity, and voice, audio and video convergence in the markets that we operate.

We currently anticipate that revenues for the third quarter of 2012 will be lower than the first and second quarters of 2012. Notwithstanding our belief that we may return to a sequential increase in royalty revenues for the fourth quarter of 2012 after a few quarters of sequential revenue declines, we further believe that our 2012 annual revenues may be lower than our 2011 annual revenues. We believe a variety of factors negatively affect our projected financial results; most significantly, the current uncertain macroeconomic environment, 3G inventory declines ahead of new smartphone introductions later in the year and intense pricing pressure in the 2G feature phone segment as consumers transition to low cost smartphones.

Furthermore, due to the uncertainty about the sustainability of the market recovery, it is extremely difficult for our customers, our vendors and us to accurately forecast and plan future business activities. Therefore, current economic conditions, and specifically the volatility in the semiconductor and consumer electronics industries, and consolidation in the semiconductor industry, could seriously impact our revenue and harm our business, financial condition and operating results. As a result, our past operating results should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Total Revenues

Total revenues were $13.6 million and $28.7 million for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, representing a decrease of 6% and 3%, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2011. The decrease in total revenues for the second quarter and first half of 2012 reflected lower royalty and other revenues offset by slightly higher licensing revenues. Five largest customers accounted for 73% and 67% of our total revenues for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, as compared to 49% and 59% for the comparable periods in 2011. Four customers accounted for 25%, 12%, 15% and 12% of our total revenues for the second quarter of 2012, as compared to one customer that accounted for 12% of our total revenues for the second quarter of 2011. Three customers accounted for 28%, 12% and 12% of our total revenues for the first half of 2012, as compared to four customers that accounted for 14%, 16%, 10% and 10% of our total revenues for the first half of 2011. Because of the nature of our license agreements and the associated large initial payments due, the identity of major customers generally varies from quarter to quarter, and we do not believe that we are materially dependent on any one specific customer or any specific small number of licensees. Our total revenues derived from the handsets and mobile broadband markets represented 80% and 79% of our total revenues for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, as compared to 76% and 80% for the comparable periods in 2011.

Licensing Revenues

Licensing revenues were $5.4 million and $10.5 million for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, an increase of 3% and 2% from the second quarter and first half of 2011. The increase in licensing revenues for the second quarter and first half of 2012, as compared to the corresponding periods of 2011, reflected higher revenues from our CEVA-TeakLite DSP core family of products and our Bluetooth IP, partially offset by lower revenues from our CEVA-X DSP core family of products and our SATA IP.

Licensing revenues accounted for 39% and 37% of our total revenues for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, compared to 36% and 35% for the comparable periods of 2011. During the second quarter of 2012, we concluded eight new license agreements. Six agreements were for CEVA DSP cores, platforms and software, and two agreements were for CEVA Bluetooth IP. Target applications for customer deployment are LTE smartphones, microcells, broadband communications and connectivity. Geographically, three of the agreements signed were in the U.S., and five were in Asia Pacific.

Royalty Revenues

Royalty revenues were $7.6 million and $16.7 million for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, a decrease of 8% and 4% from the second quarter and first half of 2011. Royalty revenues accounted for 56% and 58% of our total revenues for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, compared to 58% and 59% for the comparable periods of 2011. The decrease in royalty revenues for the second quarter and first half of 2012 reflected mainly a decrease in the average per unit royalty rate and lower quantities of 2G products shipped incorporating our technology, partially offset by higher quantities of 3G products shipped incorporating our technology which also bear higher royalty average selling prices. Our customers reported sales of 247 million chipsets and 525 million chipsets incorporating our technologies for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, compared to 246 million and 482 million for the comparable periods of 2011. The five largest royalty-paying customers accounted for 82% and 83% of our total royalty revenues for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, compared to 72% and 76% for the comparable periods of 2011.

As of June 30, 2012, 28 licensees were shipping products incorporating our technologies pursuant to 36 licensing arrangements. As of June 30, 2011, 29 licensees were shipping products incorporating our technologies pursuant to 38 licensing arrangements.

Other Revenues

Other revenues were $0.6 million and $1.5 million for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, a decrease of 31% and 8% from the second quarter and first half of 2011, respectively. The decrease in other revenues for the second quarter of 2012 reflected lower technical support revenues and lower sales of development systems. The decrease in other revenues for the first half of 2012 reflected lower technical support revenues, offset by higher sales of development systems. Other revenues accounted for 5% of our total revenues for both the second quarter and first half of 2012, compared to 6% for both the comparable periods of 2011. Other revenues include support and training for licensees and sales of development systems.

Geographic Revenue Analysis


	First Half 2012			First Half 2011			Second Quarter 2012			Second Quarter 2011
	(in millions, except percentages)
United States	$	6.2	21%	$	6.5	22%	$	3.2	23%	$	3.4	23%
Europe and Middle East (1) (2)	$	7.1	25%	$	11.3	39%	$	3.4	25%	$	3.8	27%
Asia Pacific (3) (4) (5)	$	15.4	54%	$	11.6	39%	$	7.0	52%	$	7.2	50%

(1) Germany	$	3.4	12%	$	7.7	26%	$	1.6	12%	$	2.2	15%
(2) Switzerland	$	*)	*)	$	3.1	11%	$	*)	*)	$	*)	*)
(3) Japan	$	3.1	11%	$	*)	*)	$	*)	*)	$	*)	*)
(4) China	$	9.3	32%	$	6.3	22%	$	4.1	30%	$	3.6	25%
(5) S. Korea	$	*)	*)	$	*)	*)	$	1.6	12%	$	*)	*)

*)	Less than 10%

Due to the nature of our license agreements and the associated potential large individual contract amounts, the geographic split of revenues both in absolute and percentage terms generally varies from quarter to quarter.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues were $1.0 million and $1.9 million for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, compared to $0.9 million and $1.8 million for the comparable periods of 2011. Cost of revenues accounted for 7% of our total revenues for both the second quarter and first half of 2012, compared to 6% for both the comparable periods of 2011. The increase for the second quarter of 2012 principally reflected higher salary and related costs. The increase for the first half of 2012 principally reflected higher salary and related costs, partially offset by lower customization work for our licensees. Included in cost of revenues for the second quarter and first half of 2012 were non-cash equity-based compensation expense of $53,000 and $104,000, respectively, compared to $61,000 and $110,000 for the comparable periods of 2011.

Gross Margin

Gross margin for the second quarter and first half of 2012 were both 93%, compared to 94% for both the comparable periods of 2011. Gross margin decreased for the comparable periods mainly due to lower royalty revenues which have higher gross margins.

Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses were $9.4 million and $19.0 million for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, compared to $9.5 million and $18.7 million for the comparable periods of 2011. The decrease in total operating expenses for the second quarter of 2012 principally reflected higher research grants received from the Office of Chief Scientist of Israel, partially offset by higher project-related expenses. The increase in total operating expenses for the first half of 2012 principally reflected higher salary and related costs, project-related expenses, travel expenses and non-cash equity-based compensation expenses, partially offset by lower commission expenses and higher research grants received from the Office of Chief Scientist of Israel.

We currently anticipate that our operating expenses will be lower in 2012 in comparison to 2011.

Research and Development Expenses, Net

Our research and development expenses, net were $5.4 million and $10.9 million for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, compared to $5.4 million and $10.7 million for the comparable periods of 2011. Research and development expenses, net for the second quarter of 2012 principally reflected higher project-related expenses in comparison to the second quarter of 2011, partially offset by higher research grants received from the Office of Chief Scientist of Israel in comparison to the second quarter of 2011. The net increase for the first half of 2012 principally reflected higher salary and related costs and higher project-related expenses, partially offset by higher research grants received from the Office of Chief Scientist of Israel. Included in research and development expenses for the second quarter and first half of 2012 were non-cash equity-based compensation expenses of $394,000 and $859,000, respectively, compared to $484,000 and $862,000 for the comparable periods of 2011. Research and development expenses as a percentage of our total revenues were 40% and 38% for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, compared to 38% and 36% for the comparable periods of 2011.

The number of research and development personnel was 129 at June 30, 2012, compared to 131 at June 30, 2011.

Sales and Marketing Expenses

Our sales and marketing expenses were $2.1 million and $4.4 million for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, compared to $2.3 million and $4.5 for the comparable periods of 2011. The decrease for the second quarter of 2012 principally reflected lower marketing and trade show expenses and lower commission expenses. The decrease for the first half of 2012 principally reflected lower commission expenses, partially offset by higher marketing and trade show expenses and travel expenses. Included in sales and marketing expenses for the second quarter and first half of 2012 were non-cash equity-based compensation expenses of $200,000 and $439,000, respectively, compared to $255,000 and $456,000 for the comparable periods of 2011. Sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of our total revenues were 15% for both the second quarter and first half of 2012, compared to 16% and 15% for the comparable periods of 2011.

The total number of sales and marketing personnel was 24 at the end of both June 30, 2012 and 2011.

General and Administrative Expenses

Our general and administrative expenses were $1.8 million and $3.7 million for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, compared to $1.7 million and $3.5 million for the comparable periods of 2011. The increase for the second quarter of 2012 principally reflected higher professional services cost. The increase for the first half of 2012 principally reflected higher non-cash equity-based compensation expenses. Included in general and administrative expenses for the second quarter and first half of 2012 were non-cash equity-based compensation expenses of $430,000 and $920,000, respectively, compared to $371,000 and $697,000 for the comparable periods of 2011. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of our total revenues were 14% and 13% for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, compared to 12% for both the comparable periods of 2011.

The number of general and administrative personnel was 24 at June 30, 2012, compared to 23 at June 30, 2011.

Financial Income, Net (in millions)


	First Half 2012		First Half 2011			Second Quarter 2012		Second Quarter 2011
Financial income, net	$	1.92	$	1.25		$	0.97	$	0.70
*of which:*
Interest income and gains and losses from marketable securities, net	$	1.89	$	1.34		$	0.92	$	0.71
Foreign exchange loss	$	0.03	$	(0.09	)	$	0.05	$	(0.01	)

Financial income, net, consists of interest earned on investments, gains and losses from marketable securities, amortization of discounts and premiums on marketable securities and foreign exchange movements.

The increase in interest income and gains and losses from marketable securities, net, during the second quarter and first half of 2012 principally reflected higher combined cash, bank deposits and marketable securities balances held and higher yields.

We review our monthly expected non-U.S. dollar denominated expenditures and look to hold equivalent non-U.S. dollar cash balances to mitigate currency fluctuations. This has resulted in a foreign exchange gain of $52,000 and $34,000 for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, and a foreign exchange loss of $9,000 and $93,000 for the comparable periods of 2011.

Provision for Income Taxes

Our income tax expenses were $0.7 million and $1.4 million for the second quarter and first half of 2012, compared to $0.6 million and $1.4 million for the comparable periods of 2011. Higher income tax expenses for the second quarter of 2012 in comparison to the second quarter of 2011 primarily reflected a higher tax rate for our Israeli subsidiary as a result of an increase in the tax rate of one of its investment programs from a tax exempt status for the first half of 2011 to a tax rate of 10% for this investment program beginning in the first half of 2012, partially offset by less income before taxes on income. We have significant operations in Israel, and a substantial portion of our taxable income is generated there. Currently, our Israeli and Irish subsidiaries are taxed at rates substantially lower than U.S. tax rates.

Our Irish subsidiary qualified for a 12.5% tax rate on its trade. Interest income generated by our Irish subsidiary is taxed at a rate of 25%.

Our Israeli subsidiary is entitled to various tax benefits by virtue of the “Approved Enterprise” and/or “Benefited Enterprise” status granted to its eight investment programs, as defined by the Israeli Investment Law. In accordance with the Investment Law, our Israeli subsidiary’s first five investment programs were subject to corporate tax rate of 25% for the first half of 2012, and our Israeli subsidiary’s sixth, seventh and eighth investment programs were subject to corporate tax rate of 10% for the first half of 2012. The tax benefits under our Israeli subsidiary’s active investment programs are scheduled to gradually expire starting in 2014.

To maintain our Israeli subsidiary’s eligibility for the above tax benefits, it must continue to meet certain conditions under the Investment Law. Should our Israeli subsidiary fail to meet such conditions in the future, these benefits would be cancelled and it would be subject to corporate tax in Israel at the standard corporate rate and could be required to refund tax benefits already received, with interest and adjustments for inflation based on the Israeli consumer price index.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our estimates are based on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Our actual results could differ from these estimates.

We believe that the assumptions and estimates associated with allowance for doubtful accounts, fair value of financial instruments, share-based compensation and income taxes have the greatest potential impact on our consolidated financial statements. Therefore, we consider these to be our critical accounting policies and estimates.

See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed with the SEC on March 15, 2012, for a discussion of additional critical accounting policies and estimates. There have been no changes in our critical accounting policies as compared to what was previously disclosed in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

As of June 30, 2012, we had approximately $20.5 million in cash and cash equivalents, $61.6 million in short term bank deposits, $54.5 million in marketable securities, and $19.3 million in long term bank deposits, totaling $155.9 million, compared to $164.5 million at December 31, 2011. During the first half of 2012, we invested $49.0 million of cash in bank deposits and available-for-sale marketable securities with maturities up to 35 months. In addition, during the same period, bank deposits and available-for-sale marketable securities were sold or redeemed for cash amounting to $64.1 million. All of our marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale. The purchase and sale or redemption of available-for-sale marketable securities are considered part of investing cash flow. Available-for-sale marketable securities are stated at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of stockholders’ equity, net of taxes. Realized gains and losses on sales of investments, as determined on a specific identification basis, are included in the interim condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income. We did not recognize any other-than-temporarily-impaired charges on marketable securities during the first half of 2012. For more information about our marketable securities, see Notes 3 to the attached Notes to the Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.

Bank deposits are classified as short-term bank deposits and long-term bank deposits. Short-term bank deposits are non-tradable deposits with maturities of more than three months but less than one year, whereas long-term bank deposits are non-tradable deposits with maturities of more than one year. Non-tradable deposits are presented at their cost, including accrued interest, and purchases and sales are considered part of cash flows from investing activities.

Operating Activities

Cash provided by operating activities for the first half of 2012 was $9.8 million and consisted of net income of $8.3 million, adjustments for non-cash items of $2.2 million, and changes in operating assets and liabilities of $0.7 million. Adjustments for non-cash items primarily consisted of $2.6 million of depreciation and equity-based compensation expenses, $0.8 million of amortization of premiums on available-for-sale marketable securities, and $0.9 million of accrued interest on bank deposits. The decrease in cash from changes in operating assets and liabilities primarily consisted of an increase in deferred tax assets, net, of $0.4 million, a decrease in accrued expenses and other payables of $1.8 million, and a classification of excess tax benefit from equity-based compensation expenses of $0.8 million as financing cash flows, partially offset by a decrease in trade receivables of $0.4 million, a decrease in prepaid expenses and other accounts receivable of $0.6 million, an increase in trade payables of $0.4 million and an increase in income taxes payable of $1.0 million.

Cash provided by operating activities for the first half of 2011 was $13.8 million and consisted of net income of $8.8 million, adjustments for non-cash items of $3.0 million, and changes in operating assets and liabilities of $2.0 million. Adjustments for non-cash items primarily consisted of $2.4 million of depreciation and equity-based compensation expenses, $1.0 million of amortization of premiums on available-for-sale marketable securities, and $0.5 million of accrued interest on bank deposits. The increase in cash from changes in operating assets and liabilities primarily consisted of a decrease in trade receivable of $2.3 million, a decrease in prepaid expenses and other accounts receivable of $1.2 million, an increase in trade payables of $0.2 million, an increase in deferred revenues of $3.0 million, and an increase in income taxes payable of $0.4 million, partially offset by an increase in deferred tax assets, net, of $1.7 million, a decrease in accrued expenses and other payables of $1.7 million, and a classification of excess tax benefit from equity-based compensation expenses of $1.8 million as financing cash flows.

Cash flows from operating activities may vary significantly from quarter to quarter depending on the timing of our receipts and payments. Our ongoing cash outflows from operating activities principally relate to payroll-related costs and obligations under our property leases and design tool licenses. Our primary sources of cash inflows are receipts from our accounts receivable and interest earned from our cash, deposits and marketable securities. The timing of receipts of accounts receivable from customers is based upon the completion of agreed milestones or agreed dates as set out in the contracts.

Investing Activities

Net cash provided by investing activities for the first half of 2012 was $14.9 million, compared to $24.8 million of net cash used in investing activities for the comparable period of 2011. We had a cash outflow of $20.4 million and a cash inflow of $35.0 million in respect of investments in marketable securities during the first half of 2012, as compared to cash outflow of $27.6 million and a cash inflow of $20.5 million in respect of investments in marketable securities during the first half of 2011. For the first half of 2012, we had net proceeds of $0.5 million from bank deposits, as compared to a net investment of $17.4 million in bank deposits for the comparable period of 2011.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities for the first half of 2012 was $19.2 million, compared to $8.4 million of net cash provided by financing activities for the comparable period of 2011.

In January 2012, our Board of Directors reaffirmed its authorization for the repurchase by the company of 1,966,700 shares of common stock pursuant to Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. During the first half of 2012, we repurchased 1,066,742 shares of common stock pursuant to our share repurchase program, at an average purchase price of $19.49 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $20.8 million. No repurchases were done during the first half of 2011.

During the first half of 2012, we received $0.9 million from the issuance of common stock and treasury stock upon exercises of stock options and purchases under our employee stock purchase plan, as compared to $6.6 million received during the first half of 2011 from the issuance of common stock upon exercises of stock options and purchases under our employee stock purchase plan. During the first half of 2012 and 2011, we classified $0.8 million and $1.8 million, respectively, of excess tax benefit from equity-based compensation expenses as financing cash flows.

We believe that our current cash on hand, short-term deposits and marketable securities, along with cash from operations, will provide sufficient capital to fund our operations for at least the next 12 months. We cannot provide assurances, however, that the underlying assumed levels of revenues and expenses will prove to be accurate.

In addition, as part of our business strategy, we occasionally evaluate potential acquisitions of businesses, products and technologies and minority equity investments. Accordingly, a portion of our available cash may be used at any time for the acquisition of complementary products or businesses or minority equity investments. Such potential transactions may require substantial capital resources, which may require us to seek additional debt or equity financing. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully

identify suitable acquisition or investment candidates, complete acquisitions or investments, integrate acquired businesses into our current operations, or expand into new markets. Furthermore, we cannot provide assurances that additional financing will be available to us in any required time frame and on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. See “Risk Factors—We may seek to expand our business in ways that could result in diversion of resources and extra expenses.” for more detailed information.

Item 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

A majority of our revenues and a portion of our expenses are transacted in U.S. dollars and our assets and liabilities together with our cash holdings are predominately denominated in U.S. dollars. However, the majority of our expenses are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, principally the Euro, the NIS and the British Pound. Increases in volatility of the exchange rates of currencies other than the U.S. dollar versus the U.S. dollar could have an adverse effect on the expenses and liabilities that we incur when remeasured into U.S. dollars. We review our monthly expected non-U.S. dollar denominated expenditures and look to hold equivalent non-U.S. dollar cash balances to mitigate currency fluctuations. This has resulted in a foreign exchange gain of $52,000 and $34,000 for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, and a foreign exchange loss of $9,000 and $93,000 for the comparable periods of 2011. The foreign exchange losses arose principally on the Euro and the NIS assets and liabilities as a result of currency fluctuations of the Euro and the NIS against the dollar.

As a result of currency fluctuations and the remeasurement of non-U.S. dollar denominated expenditures to U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes, we may experience fluctuations in our operating results on an annual and quarterly basis. To protect against the increase in value of forecasted foreign currency cash flow resulting from salaries paid in currencies other than the U.S. dollar during the year, we follow a foreign currency cash flow hedging program. We hedge portions of the anticipated payroll for our non-U.S. employees denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar for a period of one to twelve months with forward and option contracts. During the second quarter and first half of 2012, we recorded accumulated other comprehensive loss of $171,000 and accumulated other comprehensive gain of $76,000, respectively, from our forward and option contracts, net of taxes, with respect to anticipated payroll expenses for our non-U.S. employees. During the second quarter and first half of 2011, we recorded accumulated other comprehensive loss of $41,000 and $24,000, respectively, from our forward and option contracts, net of taxes, with respect to anticipated payroll expenses for our non-U.S. employees. As of June 30, 2012, the amount of other comprehensive loss from our forward and option contracts, net of taxes, was $129,000, which will be recorded in the consolidated statements of income during the following 10 months. We recognized a net loss of $83,000 and $140,000 for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, and a net gain of $169,000 and $242,000 for the comparable periods of 2011, related to forward and options contracts. We note that hedging transactions may not successfully mitigate losses caused by currency fluctuations. We expect to continue to experience the effect of exchange rate and currency fluctuations on an annual and quarterly basis.

The majority of our cash and cash equivalents are invested in high grade certificates of deposits with major U.S., European and Israeli banks. Generally, cash and cash equivalents and bank deposits may be redeemed and therefore minimal credit risk exists with respect to them. Nonetheless, deposits with these banks exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance limits or similar limits in foreign jurisdictions, to the extent such deposits are even insured in such foreign jurisdictions. While we monitor on a systematic basis the cash and cash equivalent balances in the operating accounts and adjust the balances as appropriate, these balances could be impacted if one or more of the financial institutions with which we deposit our funds fails or is subject to other adverse conditions in the financial or credit markets. To date, we have experienced no loss of principal or lack of access to our invested cash or cash equivalents; however, we can provide no assurance that access to our invested cash and cash equivalents will not be affected if the financial institutions that we hold our cash and cash equivalents fail.

We hold an investment portfolio consisting principally of corporate bonds. We intend, and have the ability, to hold such investments until recovery of temporary declines in market value or maturity. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2012, we believe the losses associated with our investments are temporary and no impairment loss was recognized during the first half of 2012. However, we can provide no assurance that we will recover present declines in the market value of our investments.

Interest income and gains and losses from marketable securities, net, were $0.92 million and $1.89 million for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, compared to $0.71 million and $1.34 million for the comparable periods of 2011. The increase in interest income and gains and losses from marketable securities, net, during the first half of 2012 principally reflected higher combined cash, bank deposits and marketable securities balances held and higher yields.

We are exposed primarily to fluctuations in the level of U.S., Israeli and EMU (European Monetary Union) interest rates. To the extent that interest rates rise, fixed interest investments may be adversely impacted, whereas a decline in interest rates may decrease the anticipated interest income for variable rate investments. We typically do not attempt to reduce or eliminate our market exposures on our investment securities because the majority of our investments are short-term. We currently do not have any derivative instruments but may put them in place in the future. Fluctuations in interest rates within our investment portfolio have not had, and we do not currently anticipate such fluctuations will have, a material effect on our financial position on an annual or quarterly basis.

Item 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2012.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not a party to any litigation or other legal proceedings that we believe could reasonably be expected to have a material effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Item 1A.

RISK FACTORS

This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements concerning our future products, expenses, revenue, liquidity and cash needs as well as our plans and strategies. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and we assume no obligation to update this information. Numerous factors could cause our actual results to differ significantly from the results described in these forward-looking statements, including the following risk factors.

There are no material changes to the Risk Factors described under the title “Factors That May Affect Future Performance” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 other than (1) changes to the Risk Factor below entitled “Our quarterly operating results fluctuate from quarter to quarter due to a variety of factors, including our lengthy sales cycle, and may not be a meaningful indicator of future performance;” (2) changes to the Risk Factor below entitled “We rely significantly on revenue derived from a limited number of customers;” (3) changes to the Risk Factor below entitled “Royalty rates could decrease for existing and future license agreements which could materially adversely affect our operating results;” (4) changes to the Risk Factor below entitled “We generate a significant amount of our total revenues from the handsets and mobile broadband markets and our business and operating results may be materially adversely affected if we do not continue to succeed in these highly competitive markets;” (5) changes to the Risk Factor below entitled “Because we have significant international operations, we may be subject to political, economic and other conditions relating to our international operations that could increase our operating expenses and disrupt our revenues and business;” (6) changes to the Risk Factor below entitled “Our research and development expenses may increase if the grants we currently receive from the Israeli government are reduced or withheld;” (7) changes to the Risk Factor below entitled “Our product development efforts are time-consuming and expensive and may not generate an acceptable return, if any,” (8) changes to the Risk Factor below entitled “The Israeli tax benefits that we currently receive and the government programs in which we participate require us to meet certain conditions and may be terminated or reduced in the future, which could increase our tax expenses,” and (9) changes to the Risk Factor below entitled “Our corporate tax rate may increase, which could adversely impact our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.”

The markets in which we operate are highly competitive, and as a result we could experience a loss of sales, lower prices and lower revenue.

The markets for the products in which our technology is incorporated are highly competitive. Aggressive competition could result in substantial declines in the prices that we are able to charge for our intellectual property. Many of our competitors are striving to increase their share of the growing DSP market and are reducing their licensing and royalty fees to attract customers. The following industry players and factors may have a significant impact on our competitiveness:

•

We compete directly in the DSP cores space with Cognovo (in the process of being acquired by u-Blox), Coresonic (in the process of being acquired by Mediatek) and Verisilicon;

•

We compete with CPU IP providers, such as ARM Holdings, Synopsys (through its acquisition of the ARC technology), and Tensilica, who offer DSP and DSP extensions to their IP;

•

We compete with internal engineering teams at companies such as Broadcom, Mediatek, Qualcomm, Samsung and ST Ericsson that may design programmable DSP core products in-house and therefore not license our technologies;

•

We compete in the SATA and SAS IP markets with several vendors, such as Gennum’s Snowbush IP group, Silicon Image and Synopsys, that offer similar products, thereby leading to pricing pressures for both licensing and royalty revenue;

•

We compete in the imaging & vision market with Imagination Technologies and Silicon Image;

•

We compete in the VoIP applications market with ARM Holdings, MIPS Technologies and Verisilicon; and

•

We compete in the audio applications market with ARM Holdings, Synopsys (through its acquisition of the ARC Technology), Tensilica and Verisilicon.

In addition, we may face increased competition from smaller, niche semiconductor design companies in the future. Some of our customers also may decide to satisfy their needs through in-house design. We compete on the basis of DSP performance, overall chip cost, power consumption, flexibility, reliability, communication and multimedia software availability, design cycle time, tool chain, customer support, name recognition, reputation and financial strength. Our inability to compete effectively on these bases could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our quarterly operating results fluctuate from quarter to quarter due to a variety of factors, including our lengthy sales cycle, and may not be a meaningful indicator of future performance.

In some quarters our operating results could be below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, which could cause our stock price to fall. Factors that may affect our quarterly results of operations in the future include, among other things:

•

the timing of the introduction of new or enhanced technologies by us and our competitors, as well as the market acceptance of such technologies;

•

the timing and volume of orders and production by our customers, as well as fluctuations in royalty revenues resulting from fluctuations in unit shipments by our licensees;

•

royalty pricing pressures and reduction in royalty rates due to an increase in volume shipments by customers, end-product price erosion and competitive pressures;

•

the mix of revenues among licensing revenues, royalty revenues and other revenues;

•

our lengthy sales cycle and specifically in the third quarter of any fiscal year during which summer vacations slow down decision-making processes of our customers in executing contracts;

•

the gain or loss of significant licensees, partly due to our dependence on a limited number of customers generating a significant amount of quarterly revenues;

•

any delay in execution of any anticipated licensing arrangement during a particular quarter;

•

delays in the commercialization of end products that incorporate our technology;

•

currency fluctuations of the Euro, the British Pound and NIS versus the U.S. dollar;

•

fluctuations in operating expenses and gross margins associated with the introduction of new or enhanced technologies and adjustments to operating expenses resulting from restructurings;

•

the timing of certain R&D government grant payments;

•

our ability to scale our operations in response to changes in demand for our technologies;

•

entry into new markets, including China, India and Latin America;

•

changes in our pricing policies and those of our competitors;

•

restructuring, asset and goodwill impairment and related charges, as well as other accounting changes or adjustments; and

•

general economic conditions, including the current economic conditions, and its effect on the semiconductor industry and sales of consumer products into which our technologies are incorporated.

Each of the above factors is difficult to forecast and could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, we license our technology to OEM customers for incorporation into their end products for consumer markets, including handsets and consumer electronics products. The royalties we generate are reported by our customers and invoiced by us one quarter in arrears. As a result, our royalty revenues are affected by seasonal buying patterns of consumer products sold by our OEM customers that incorporate our technology and the market acceptance of such end products supplied by our OEM customers. The second quarter in any given year is usually the weakest quarter for us in relation to royalty revenues as this period represents lower post-Christmas first quarter handsets and consumer products shipments. However, the magnitude of this general quarterly fluctuation varies annually and may be impacted by global economic conditions and market share changes in handset devices powered by CEVA technology sold in any given quarter compared to the prior quarter.

We rely significantly on revenue derived from a limited number of customers.

We expect that a limited number of customers, generally varying in identity from period-to-period, will account for a substantial portion of our revenues in any period. Four customers, varying in identity from period-to-period, accounted for 25%, 12%, 15% and 12% of our total revenues for the second quarter of 2012. Three customers, varying in identity from period-to-period, accounted for 28%, 12% and 12% of our total revenues for the first half of 2012. Our five largest customers, varying in identity from period-to-period, accounted for 73% and 67% of our total revenues for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively. Our

five largest royalty-paying customers, varying in identity from period-to-period, accounted for 82% and 83% of our total royalty revenues for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively. Moreover, license agreements for our DSP cores have not historically provided for substantial ongoing license payments. Significant portions of our anticipated future revenue, therefore, will likely depend upon our success in attracting new customers or expanding our relationships with existing customers. Our ability to succeed in these efforts will depend on a variety of factors, including the performance, quality, breadth and depth of our current and future products, as well as our sales and marketing skills. In addition, some of our licensees may in the future decide to satisfy their needs through in-house design and production. Our failure to obtain future licensing customers would impede our future revenue growth and could materially harm our business. Moreover, the growth of our business is significantly dependent on our customers and market acceptance of their end-products that incorporate our technologies. Furthermore, consolidation among our customers may negatively affect our revenue source and increase our existing customers’ negotiation leverage.

Royalty rates could decrease for existing and future license agreements which could materially adversely affect our operating results.

Royalty payments to us under existing and future license agreements could be lower than currently anticipated for a variety of reasons. Average selling prices for semiconductor products generally decrease over time during the lifespan of a product. In addition, there is increasing downward pricing pressures in the semiconductor industry on end products incorporating our technology, especially end products for the handsets and consumer electronics markets. As a result, notwithstanding the existence of a license agreement, our customers may demand that royalty rates for our products be lower than our historic royalty rates. We have in the past and may be pressured in the future to renegotiate existing license agreements with our customers. In addition, certain of our license agreements provide that royalty rates may decrease in connection with the sale of larger quantities of products incorporating our technology. Furthermore, our competitors may lower the royalty rates for their comparable products to win market share which may force us to lower our royalty rates as well. As a consequence of the above referenced factors, as well as unforeseen factors in the future, the royalty rates we receive for use of our technology could decrease, thereby decreasing future anticipated revenue and cash flow. Royalty revenues were approximately 56% and 58% of our total revenues for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively. Therefore, a significant decrease in our royalty revenues could materially adversely affect our operating results.

Moreover, royalty rates may be negatively affected by macroeconomic trends. For example, we currently anticipate that revenues for the third quarter of 2012 will be lower than the first and second quarters of 2012 and our 2012 annual revenues may be lower than 2011 annual revenues. These financial projections are due to a variety of factors, one of which is the anticipated continued decrease in royalties associated with a decline in the average selling prices of low-cost 2G feature phones. Moreover, consolidation among our customers may increase the leverage of our existing customers to extract concessions from us in royalty rates.

We generate a significant amount of our total revenues from the handsets and mobile broadband markets and our business and operating results may be materially adversely affected if we do not continue to succeed in these highly competitive markets.

Revenues derived from the handsets and mobile broadband markets accounted for approximately 80% and 79% of our total revenues for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively. Any adverse change in our ability to compete and maintain our competitive position in the handsets and mobile broadband markets, including through the introduction by competitors of enhanced technologies that attract OEM customers that target these markets, would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, the handsets and mobile broadband markets are extremely competitive and are facing intense pricing pressures, and we expect that competition and pricing pressures will only increase. Our existing OEM customers may fail to introduce new handsets or mobile broadband devices that attract consumers, or encounter significant delays in developing, manufacturing or shipping new or enhanced products in these markets. The inability of our OEM customers to compete would result in lower shipments of products powered by our technologies which in turn would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

According to Gartner Research, in the first quarter of 2012, sales of handsets to end-users declined 2% versus the first quarter of 2011. This was the first time since the second quarter of 2009 that the handsets market has contracted. This market downturn, which comes after 10 straight quarters of growth, is mainly due to the economic weakness in mature markets and slowing demand in the Asia Pacific region as consumers wait for new smartphone launches. Since a significant portion of our revenues are derived from the handsets market, adverse conditions in this market would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We depend on market acceptance of third-party semiconductor intellectual property.

The semiconductor intellectual property (SIP) industry is a relatively small and emerging industry. Our future growth will depend on the level of market acceptance of our third-party licensable intellectual property model, the variety of intellectual property offerings available on the market, and a shift in customer preference away from in-house development of proprietary DSPs towards licensing open DSP cores. Furthermore, the third-party licensable intellectual property model is highly dependent on the market adoption of new services and products, such as smartphones, mobile broad band, ultra-low-cost phones in emerging markets, Personal Multimedia Players (PMP), Blu-ray DVDs, connected digital TVs and set-top boxes with high definition audio and video. Such market adoption is important because the increased cost associated with ownership and maintenance of the more complex architectures needed for the advanced services and products may motivate companies to license third-party intellectual property rather than design them in-house.

The trends that would enable our growth are largely beyond our control. Semiconductor customers also may choose to adopt a multi-chip, off-the-shelf chip solution versus licensing or using highly-integrated chipsets that embed our technologies. If the above referenced market shifts do not materialize or third-party SIP does not achieve market acceptance, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially harmed.

Because our IP solutions are components of end products, if semiconductor companies and electronic equipment manufacturers do not incorporate our solutions into their end products or if the end products of our customers do not achieve market acceptance, we may not be able to generate adequate sales of our products.

We do not sell our IP solutions directly to end-users; we license our technology primarily to semiconductor companies and electronic equipment manufacturers, who then incorporate our technology into the products they sell. As a result, we rely on our customers to incorporate our technology into their end products at the design stage. Once a company incorporates a competitor’s technology into its end product, it becomes significantly more difficult for us to sell our technology to that company because changing suppliers involves significant cost, time, effort and risk for the company. As a result, we may incur significant expenditures on the development of a new technology without any assurance that our existing or potential customers will select our technology for incorporation into their own product and without this “design win,” it becomes significantly difficult to sell our IP solutions. Moreover, even after a customer agrees to incorporate our technology into its end products, the design cycle is long and may be delayed due to factors beyond our control, which may result in the end product incorporating our technology not reaching the market until long after the initial “design win” with such customer. From initial product design-in to volume production, many factors could impact the timing and/or amount of sales actually realized from the design-in. These factors include, but are not limited to, changes in the competitive position of our technology, our customers’ financial stability, and our ability to ship products according to our customers’ schedule. Moreover, current economic conditions may further prolong a customer’s decision-making process and design cycle.

Further, because we do not control the business practices of our customers, we do not influence the degree to which they promote our technology or set the prices at which they sell products incorporating our technology. We cannot assure you that our customers will devote satisfactory efforts to promote our IP solutions. In addition, our unit royalties from licenses are dependent upon the success of our customers in introducing products incorporating our technology and the success of those products in the marketplace. The primary customers for our products are semiconductor design and manufacturing companies, system OEMs and electronic equipment manufacturers, particularly in the telecommunications field. These industries are highly cyclical and have been subject to significant economic downturns at various times, particularly in recent periods, including the global economic downturn that started in the second half of 2008. These downturns are characterized by production overcapacity and reduced revenues, which at times may encourage semiconductor companies or electronic product manufacturers to reduce their expenditure on our technology. If we do not retain our current customers and continue to attract new customers, our business may be harmed.

Because we have significant international operations, we may be subject to political, economic and other conditions relating to our international operations that could increase our operating expenses and disrupt our revenues and business.

Approximately 78% of our total revenues for the first half of 2012 were derived from customers located outside of the United States. We expect that international customers will continue to account for a significant portion of our revenue for the foreseeable future. As a result, the occurrence of any negative international political, economic or geographic events could result in significant revenue shortfalls. These shortfalls could cause our business, financial condition and results of operations to be harmed. Some of the risks of doing business internationally include:

•

unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;

•

fluctuations in the exchange rate for the U.S. dollar;

•

imposition of tariffs and other barriers and restrictions;

•

burdens of complying with a variety of foreign laws, treaties and technical standards;

•

uncertainty of laws and enforcement in certain countries relating to the protection of intellectual property;

•

multiple and possibly overlapping tax structures and potentially adverse tax consequences;

•

political and economic instability; and

•

changes in diplomatic and trade relationships.

We depend on a limited number of key personnel who would be difficult to replace.

Our success depends to a significant extent upon certain of our key employees and senior management, the loss of which could materially harm our business. Competition for skilled employees in our field is intense. We cannot assure you that in the future we will be successful in attracting and retaining the required personnel.

The sales cycle for our IP solutions is lengthy, which makes forecasting of our customer orders and revenues difficult.

The sales cycle for our IP solutions is lengthy, often lasting three to nine months. Our customers generally conduct significant technical evaluations, including customer trials, of our technology as well as competing technologies prior to making a purchasing decision. In addition, purchasing decisions also may be delayed because of a customer’s internal budget approval process. Furthermore, given the current market conditions, we have less ability to predict the timing of our customers’ purchasing cycle and potential unexpected delays in such a cycle. Because of the lengthy sales cycle and potential delays, our dependence on a limited number of customers to generate a significant amount of revenues for a particular period and the size of customer orders, if orders forecasted for a specific customer for a particular period do not occur in that period, our revenues and operating results for that particular quarter could suffer. Moreover, a portion of our expenses related to an anticipated order is fixed and difficult to reduce or change, which may further impact our operating results for a particular period.

Because our IP solutions are complex, the detection of errors in our products may be delayed, and if we deliver products with defects, our credibility will be harmed, the sales and market acceptance of our products may decrease and product liability claims may be made against us.

Our IP solutions are complex and may contain errors, defects and bugs when introduced. If we deliver products with errors, defects or bugs, our credibility and the market acceptance and sales of our products could be significantly harmed. Furthermore, the nature of our products may also delay the detection of any such error or defect. If our products contain errors, defects and bugs, then we may be required to expend significant capital and resources to alleviate these problems. This could result in the diversion of technical and other resources from our other development efforts. Any actual or perceived problems or delays may also adversely affect our ability to attract or retain customers. Furthermore, the existence of any defects, errors or failure in our products could lead to product liability claims or lawsuits against us or against our customers. A successful product liability claim could result in substantial cost and divert management’s attention and resources, which would have a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our operating results are affected by general economic conditions and the highly cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry.

During the global downturn that started in the second half of 2008 and continued throughout 2009, general worldwide economic conditions significantly deteriorated, and resulted in decreased consumer confidence and spending, reduced corporate profits and capital spending, adverse business conditions and liquidity concerns. Notwithstanding improvements in business conditions since the second half of 2009, there continues to be uncertainty about the global economy and outlook, which continue to make it difficult for our customers, the end-product customers, our vendors and us to accurately forecast and plan future business activities and make reliable projections.

Moreover, we operate within the semiconductor industry which experiences significant fluctuations in sales and profitability. Downturns in the semiconductor industry are characterized by diminished product demand, excess customer inventories, accelerated erosion of prices and excess production capacity. These factors could cause substantial fluctuations in our revenues and in our results of operations.

If global economic and market conditions remain uncertain or deteriorate, we could experience a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.

Our success will depend on our ability to successfully manage our geographically dispersed operations.

Most of our employees are located in Israel and Ireland. Accordingly, our ability to compete successfully will depend in part on the ability of a limited number of key executives located in geographically dispersed offices to integrate management, address the needs of our customers and respond to changes in our markets. If we are unable to effectively manage and integrate our remote operations, our business may be materially harmed.

Our operations in Israel may be adversely affected by instability in the Middle East region.

One of our principal research and development facilities is located in, and our executive officers and some of our directors are residents of Israel. Although substantially all of our sales currently are being made to customers outside Israel, we are nonetheless directly influenced by the political, economic and military conditions affecting Israel. Any major hostilities involving Israel could significantly harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

In addition, certain of our officers and employees are currently obligated to perform annual reserve duty in the Israel Defense Forces and are subject to being called to active military duty at any time. Although we have operated effectively under these requirements since our inception, we cannot predict the effect of these obligations on the company in the future. Our operations could be disrupted by the absence, for a significant period, of one or more of our key officers or key employees due to military service.

Our research and development expenses may increase if the grants we currently receive from the Israeli government are reduced or withheld.

We currently receive research grants from programs of the Office of the Chief Scientist of Israel of the Israeli Ministry of Industry and Trade. We received an aggregate of $658,000 for the first half of 2012. To be eligible for these grants, we must meet certain development conditions and comply with periodic reporting obligations. Although we have met such conditions in the past, should we fail to meet such conditions in the future our research grants may be repayable, reduced or withheld. The repayment or reduction of such research grants may increase our research and development expenses which in turn may reduce our operating income.

We are exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates.

A significant portion of our business is conducted outside the United States. Although most of our revenue is transacted in U.S. dollars, we may be exposed to currency exchange fluctuations in the future as business practices evolve and we are forced to transact business in local currencies. Moreover, the majority of our expenses are denominated in foreign currencies, mainly New Israeli Shekel (NIS), Euro and British Pound, which subjects us to the risks of foreign currency fluctuations. Our primary expenses paid in the NIS, Euro and British Pound are employee salaries. Increases in the volatility of the exchange rates of the NIS, Euro and British Pound versus the U.S. dollar could have an adverse effect on the expenses and liabilities that we incur in NIS, Euro and British Pound when remeasured into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. We have instituted a foreign cash flow hedging program to minimize the effects of currency fluctuations. However, hedging transactions may not successfully mitigate losses caused by currency fluctuations, and our hedging positions may be partial or may not exist at all in the future. We also review our monthly expected non-U.S. dollar denominated expenditure and look to hold equivalent non-U.S. dollar cash balances to mitigate currency fluctuations. We expect to continue to experience the effect of exchange rate currency fluctuations on an annual and quarterly basis.

Our product development efforts are time-consuming and expensive and may not generate an acceptable return, if any.

Our product development efforts require us to incur substantial research and development expense. Our research and development expenses were approximately $10.9 million for the first half of 2012 and represented 38% of our total revenues for the period. We may not be able to achieve an acceptable return, if any, on our research and development efforts.

The development of our products is highly complex. We occasionally have experienced delays in completing the development and introduction of new products and product enhancements, and we could experience delays in the future. Unanticipated problems in developing products could also divert substantial engineering resources, which may impair our ability to develop new products and enhancements and could substantially increase our costs. Furthermore, we may expend significant amounts on research and development programs that may not ultimately result in commercially successful products. As a result of these and other factors, we may be unable to develop and introduce new products successfully and in a cost-effective and timely manner, and any new products we develop and offer may never achieve market acceptance. Any failure to successfully develop future products would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we are unable to meet the changing needs of our end-users or address evolving market demands, our business may be harmed.

The markets for programmable DSP cores and application IP are characterized by rapidly changing technology, emerging markets and new and developing end-user needs, and requiring significant expenditure for research and development. We cannot assure you that we will be able to introduce systems and solutions that reflect prevailing industry standards, on a timely basis, meet the specific technical requirements of our end-users or avoid significant losses due to rapid decreases in market prices of our products, and our failure to do so may seriously harm our business.

We may seek to expand our business in ways that could result in diversion of resources and extra expenses.

We may in the future pursue acquisitions of businesses, products and technologies, establish joint venture arrangements, make minority equity investments or enhance our existing CEVAnet partner eco-system to expand our business. We are unable to

predict whether or when any prospective acquisition, equity investment or joint venture will be completed. The process of negotiating potential acquisitions, joint ventures or equity investments, as well as the integration of acquired or jointly developed businesses, technologies or products may be prolonged due to unforeseen difficulties and may require a disproportionate amount of our resources and management’s attention. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully identify suitable acquisition or investment candidates, complete acquisitions or investments, or integrate acquired businesses or joint ventures with our operations. If we were to make any acquisition or investment or enter into a joint venture, we may not receive the intended benefits of the acquisition, investment or joint venture or such an acquisition, investment or joint venture may not achieve comparable levels of revenues, profitability or productivity as our existing business or otherwise perform as expected. The expansion of our CEVAnet partner eco-system also may not achieve the anticipated benefits. The occurrence of any of these events could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations. Future acquisitions, investments or joint ventures may require substantial capital resources, which may require us to seek additional debt or equity financing.

Future acquisitions, joint ventures or minority equity investments by us could result in the following, any of which could seriously harm our results of operations or the price of our stock:

•

issuance of equity securities that would dilute our current stockholders’ percentages of ownership;

•

large one-time write-offs or equity investment impairment write-offs;

•

incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities;

•

difficulties in the assimilation and integration of operations, personnel, technologies, products and information systems of the acquired companies;

•

diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns;

•

contractual disputes;

•

risks of entering geographic and business markets in which we have no or only limited prior experience; and

•

potential loss of key employees of acquired organizations.

We may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property.

Our success and ability to compete depend in large part upon the protection of our proprietary technologies. We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret, mask work and other intellectual property rights, confidentiality procedures and licensing arrangements to establish and protect our proprietary rights. These agreements and measures may not be sufficient to protect our technology from third-party infringement or protect us from the claims of others. As a result, we face risks associated with our patent position, including the potential need to engage in significant legal proceedings to enforce our patents, the possibility that the validity or enforceability of our patents may be denied, the possibility that third parties will be able to compete against us without infringing our patents and the possibility that our products may infringe patent rights of third parties.

Our trade names or trademarks may be registered or utilized by third parties in countries other than those in which we have registered them, impairing our ability to enter and compete in these markets. If we were forced to change any of our brand names, we could lose a significant amount of our brand identity.

Our business will suffer if we are sued for infringement of the intellectual property rights of third parties or if we cannot obtain licenses to these rights on commercially acceptable terms.

We are subject to the risk of adverse claims and litigation alleging infringement of the intellectual property rights of others. There are a large number of patents held by others, including our competitors, pertaining to the broad areas in which we are active. We have not, and cannot reasonably, investigate all such patents. From time to time, we have become aware of patents in our technology areas and have sought legal counsel regarding the validity of such patents and their impact on how we operate our business, and we will continue to seek such counsel when appropriate in the future. In addition, patent infringement claims are increasingly being asserted by patent holding companies (so-called patent “trolls”), which do not use technology and whose sole business is to enforce patents against companies, such as us, for monetary gain. Because such patent holding companies do not provide services or use technology, the assertion of our own patents by way of counter-claim may be ineffective. Infringement claims may require us to enter into license arrangements or result in protracted and costly litigation, regardless of the merits of these claims. Any necessary licenses may not be available or, if available, may not be obtainable on commercially reasonable terms. If we cannot obtain necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms, we may be forced to stop licensing our technology, and our business would be seriously harmed.

Our business depends on our customers and their suppliers obtaining required complementary components.

Some of the raw materials, components and subassemblies included in the products manufactured by our OEM customers are obtained from a limited group of suppliers. Supply disruptions, shortages or termination of any of these sources could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations due to the delay or discontinuance of orders for products containing our IP, especially our DSP cores, until those necessary components are available.

The future growth of our business depends in part on our ability to license to system OEMs and small-to-medium-sized semiconductor companies directly and to expand our sales geographically.

Historically, a substantial portion of our licensing revenues has been derived in any given period from a relatively small number of licensees. Because of the substantial license fees we charge, our customers tend to be large semiconductor companies or vertically integrated system OEMs. Part of our current growth strategy is to broaden the adoption of our products by small and mid-size companies by offering different versions of our products targeted at these companies. If we are unable to develop and market effectively our intellectual property through these models, our revenues will continue to be dependent on a smaller number of licensees and a less geographically dispersed pattern of licensees, which could materially harm our business and results of operations.

The Israeli tax benefits that we currently receive and the government programs in which we participate require us to meet certain conditions and may be terminated or reduced in the future, which could increase our tax expenses.

We enjoy certain tax benefits in Israel, particularly as a result of the “Approved Enterprise” and the “Benefited Enterprise” status of our facilities and programs. To maintain our eligibility for these tax benefits, we must continue to meet certain conditions, relating principally to adherence to the investment program filed with the Investment Center of the Israeli Ministry of Industry and Trade and to periodic reporting obligations. Should we fail to meet such conditions in the future, these benefits would be cancelled and we would be subject to corporate tax in Israel at the standard corporate rate (25% in 2012) and could be required to refund tax benefits already received. In addition, we cannot assure you that these tax benefits will be continued in the future at their current levels or otherwise. The tax benefits under our active investment programs are scheduled to gradually expire starting in 2014. The termination or reduction of certain programs and tax benefits (particularly benefits available to us as a result of the “Approved Enterprise” and the “Benefited Enterprise” status of our facilities and programs) or a requirement to refund tax benefits already received may seriously harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

We may dispose of or discontinue existing product lines and technology developments, which may adversely impact our future results.

On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our various product offerings and technology developments in order to determine whether any should be discontinued or, to the extent possible, divested. We cannot guarantee that we have correctly forecasted, or will correctly forecast in the future, the right product lines and technology developments to dispose or discontinue or that our decision to dispose of or discontinue various investments, products lines and technology developments is prudent if market conditions change. In addition, there are no assurances that the discontinuance of various product lines will reduce our operating expenses or will not cause us to incur material charges associated with such decision. Furthermore, the discontinuance of existing product lines entails various risks, including the risk that we will not be able to find a purchaser for a product line or the purchase price obtained will not be equal to at least the book value of the net assets for the product line. Other risks include managing the expectations of, and maintaining good relations with, our customers who previously purchased products from our disposed or discontinued product lines, which could prevent us from selling other products to them in the future. We may also incur other significant liabilities and costs associated with our disposal or discontinuance of product lines, including employee severance costs and excess facilities costs.

Our corporate tax rate may increase, which could adversely impact our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.

We have significant operations in Israel, as well as operations in the Republic of Ireland and a substantial portion of our taxable income historically has been generated there. Currently, some of our Israeli and Irish subsidiaries are taxed at rates substantially lower than the U.S. tax rates. If our Israeli and Irish subsidiaries were no longer to qualify for these lower tax rates or if the applicable tax laws were rescinded or changed, our operating results could be materially adversely affected. In addition, because our Israeli and Irish operations are owned by subsidiaries of our U.S. parent corporation, distributions to the U.S. parent corporation, and in certain circumstances undistributed income of the subsidiaries, may be subject to U.S. taxes. Moreover, if U.S. or other authorities were to change applicable tax laws or successfully challenge the manner in which our subsidiaries’ profits are currently recognized, our overall tax expenses could increase, and our business, cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. Also our taxes on the Irish interest income may be double taxed both in Ireland and in the U.S. due to U.S. tax regulations and Irish tax restrictions on NOLs to off-set interest income. In addition, starting in 2012, our Israeli interest income also may be double taxed both in Israel and the U.S.

Legislative action in the United States could materially and adversely affect us from a tax perspective.

Legislative action may be taken by the U.S. Congress which, if ultimately enacted, would adversely affect our effective tax rate and/or require us to take further action, at potentially significant expense, to seek to preserve our effective tax rate. President

Obama’s administration has announced budgets which included proposed future tax legislation that could substantially modify the rules governing the U.S. taxation of certain non-U.S. affiliates. These potential changes include, but are not limited to, curbing the deferral of U.S. taxation of certain foreign earnings and limiting the ability to use foreign tax credits. Many details of the proposal remain unknown, and any legislation enacting such modifications would require Congressional support and approval. We cannot predict the outcome of any specific legislative proposals. However, if any of these proposals are enacted into law, they could significantly impact our effective tax rate.

Our stock price may be volatile so you may not be able to resell your shares of our common stock at or above the price you paid for them.

Announcements of developments related to our business, announcements by competitors, quarterly fluctuations in our financial results, changes in the general conditions of the highly dynamic industry in which we compete or the national economies in which we do business, and other factors could cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate, perhaps substantially. In addition, in recent years, the stock market has experienced extreme price fluctuations, which have often been unrelated to the operating performance of affected companies. These factors and fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

Item 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The table below sets forth the information with respect to repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2012.


Period	(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased		(b) Average Price Paid per Share		(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		(d) Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1)
Month #1 (April 1, 2012 to April 30, 2012)		—		—		—		1,566,637
Month #2 (May 1, 2012 to May 31, 2012)		641,679	$	16.88		641,679		924,958
Month #3 (June 1, 2012 to June 30, 2012)		25,000	$	16.98		25,000		899,958
TOTAL		666,679	$	16.89		666,679		899,958	(2)

(1)	In January 2012, our Board of Directors reaffirmed its authorization for the repurchase of 1,966,700 shares of our common stock all pursuant to Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

(2)	The number represents the number of shares of our common stock that remain available for the repurchase pursuant to our Board’s authorization as of January 2012.

Item 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not Applicable

Item 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable

Item 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

Not Applicable

Item 6.

EXHIBITS


Exhibit No.		Description

31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer

32		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	CEVA, INC.

Date: August 9, 2012	By:	/s/ GIDEON WERTHEIZER
		Gideon Wertheizer Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)

Date: August 9, 2012	By:	/s/ YANIV ARIELI
		Yaniv Arieli Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)