Eaton Vance Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

Form N-CSR

 

 

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED

MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act File Number: 811-22777

 

 

Eaton Vance Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

 

Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

 

Maureen A. Gemma

Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110

(Name and Address of Agent for Services)

 

 

(617) 482-8260

(Registrant’s Telephone Number)

January 31

Date of Fiscal Year End

July 31, 2015

Date of Reporting Period

 

 

 


Item 1. Reports to Stockholders


LOGO

 

 

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust (ETX)

Semiannual Report

July 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

LOGO


 

 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission Registration. Effective December 31, 2012, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) adopted certain regulatory changes that subject registered investment companies and advisers to regulation by the CFTC if a fund invests more than a prescribed level of its assets in certain CFTC-regulated instruments (including futures, certain options and swap agreements) or markets itself as providing investment exposure to such instruments. The Fund has claimed an exclusion from the definition of the term “commodity pool operator” under the Commodity Exchange Act. Accordingly, neither the Fund nor the adviser with respect to the operation of the Fund is subject to CFTC regulation. Because of its management of other strategies, the Fund’s adviser is registered with the CFTC as a commodity pool operator and a commodity trading advisor.

Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.


Semiannual Report July 31, 2015

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

Table of Contents

 

Performance

     2   

Fund Profile

     2   

Endnotes and Additional Disclosures

     3   

Financial Statements

     4   

Board of Trustees’ Contract Approval

     17   

Officers and Trustees

     20   

Important Notices

     21   


Eaton Vance

Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

July 31, 2015

 

Performance1,2

 

Portfolio Manager Craig R. Brandon, CFA

 

% Average Annual Total Returns    Inception Date      Six Months      One Year      Five Years     

Since

Inception

 

Fund at NAV

     03/28/2013         –3.69      8.30              5.64

Fund at Market Price

             –3.35         8.53                 0.53   

Barclays 15 Year Municipal Bond Index

             –1.21      4.31      5.32      3.68
              
% Premium/Discount to NAV3                                        
                 –10.97
              
Distributions4                                        

Total Distributions per share for the period

               $ 0.425   

Distribution Rate at NAV

                 4.38

Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at NAV

                 7.74

Distribution Rate at Market Price

                 4.92

Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at Market Price

                 8.69
              
% Total Leverage5                                        

Residual Interest Bond (RIB) Financing

                 38.56

Fund Profile

 

 

Credit Quality (% of total investments)6,7

 

 

 

LOGO

    

 

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested and includes management fees and other expenses. Fund performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV due to factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for Fund shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, current Fund performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month-end, please refer to eatonvance.com.

 

  2  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

July 31, 2015

 

Endnotes and Additional Disclosures

 

 

1 

Barclays 15 Year Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index of municipal bonds traded in the U.S. with maturities ranging from 12-17 years. Unless otherwise stated, index returns do not reflect the effect of any applicable sales charges, commissions, expenses, taxes or leverage, as applicable. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

 

2 

Performance results reflect the effects of leverage. Performance since inception for an index, if presented, is the performance since the Fund’s or oldest share class’ inception, as applicable.

 

3 

The shares of the Fund often trade at a discount or premium from their net asset value. The discount or premium of the Fund may vary over time and may be higher or lower than what is quoted in this report. For up-to-date premium/discount information, please refer to http://eatonvance.com/closedend.

 

4 

The Distribution Rate is based on the Fund’s last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) divided by the Fund’s NAV or market price at the end of the period. The Fund’s distributions may be comprised of amounts characterized for federal income tax purposes as tax-exempt income, qualified and non-qualified ordinary dividends, capital gains and nondividend distributions, also known as return of capital. The Fund will determine the federal income tax character of distributions paid to a shareholder after the end of the calendar year. This is reported on the IRS form 1099-DIV and provided to the shareholder shortly after each year-end. For information about the tax character of distributions made in prior calendar years, please refer to Performance-Tax Character of Distributions on the Fund’s webpage available at eatonvance.com. The Fund’s distributions are determined by the investment adviser based on its current assessment of the Fund’s long-term return potential. As portfolio and market conditions change, the rate of distributions paid by the Fund could change. Taxable-equivalent performance is based on the highest combined federal and state income tax rates, where applicable. Lower tax rates would result in lower tax-equivalent performance. Actual tax rates will vary depending on your income, exemptions and deductions. Rates do not include local taxes.

 

5 

Fund employs RIB financing. The leverage created by RIB investments provides an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater price volatility). The cost of leverage rises and falls with changes in short-term interest rates. See “Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities Held” in the notes to the financial statements for more information about RIB financing. RIB leverage represents the amount of Floating Rate Notes outstanding at period end as a percentage of Fund net assets plus Floating Rate Notes.

6 

Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. If securities are rated differently by the ratings agencies, the higher rating is applied. Ratings, which are subject to change, apply to the creditworthiness of the issuers of the underlying securities and not to the Fund or its shares. Credit ratings measure the quality of a bond based on the issuer’s creditworthiness, with ratings ranging from AAA, being the highest, to D, being the lowest based on S&P’s measures. Ratings of BBB or higher by S&P or Fitch (Baa or higher by Moody’s) are considered to be investment-grade quality. Credit ratings are based largely on the ratings agency’s analysis at the time of rating. The rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer’s current financial condition and does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. Holdings designated as “Not Rated” are not rated by the national ratings agencies stated above.

 

7 

The chart includes the municipal bonds held by a trust that issues residual interest bonds, consistent with the Portfolio of Investments.

 

 

  Fund profile subject to change due to active management.

 

  Important Notice to Shareholders
  Effective July 31, 2015, the Trust is managed by Craig R. Brandon, CFA.
 

 

  3  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

July 31, 2015

 

Portfolio of Investments (Unaudited)

 

 

Tax-Exempt Municipal Securities — 158.6%   
   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  

Bond Bank — 1.5%

  

Rickenbacker Port Authority, OH, (OASBO Expanded Asset Pooled Financing Program), 5.375%, 1/1/32

  $ 3,020      $ 3,076,716   
                 
  $ 3,076,716   
                 

Education — 9.1%

  

Portland Community College District, OR, 3.25%, 6/15/32(1)(2)

  $ 10,250      $ 10,163,156   

Rutgers State University, NJ,
4.00%, 5/1/30(1)

    8,425        8,955,438   
                 
  $ 19,118,594   
                 

Electric Utilities — 7.4%

  

Apache County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Tucson Electric Power Co.), 4.50%, 3/1/30

  $ 1,480      $ 1,591,903   

Lower Colorado River Authority, TX, (LCRA Transmission Services Corp.), 4.00%, 5/15/33

    2,500        2,547,550   

Salt River Agricultural Improvement and Power District, AZ, 5.00%, 12/1/30(1)

    10,000        11,473,100   
                 
  $ 15,612,553   
                 

General Obligations — 38.4%

  

Centennial Independent School District No. 12, Circle Pines, MN, 0.00%, 2/1/29

  $ 975      $ 616,268   

Clackamas Community College District, OR, 0.00%, 6/15/28

    1,830        1,117,233   

Clackamas Community College District, OR, 0.00%, 6/15/29

    1,000        580,960   

Clovis Unified School District, CA, (Election of 2012), 0.00%, 8/1/28

    1,000        613,110   

Clovis Unified School District, CA, (Election of 2012), 0.00%, 8/1/29

    2,395        1,392,405   

Clovis Unified School District, CA, (Election of 2012), 0.00%, 8/1/30

    2,575        1,418,053   

Fresno Unified School District, CA, (Election of 2010), 0.00%, 8/1/30

    800        414,928   

Fresno Unified School District, CA, (Election of 2010), 0.00%, 8/1/31

    955        469,468   

Hawaii, 5.00%, 11/1/28(1)(2)

    8,000        9,336,560   

Illinois, 5.00%, 5/1/33

    3,200        3,265,696   

Leander Independent School District, TX, (PSF Guaranteed), 0.00%, 8/15/31

    5,000        2,692,150   

Pennsylvania, 4.00%, 4/1/29(1)(2)

    10,000        10,539,700   

Riverside County Community College District, CA, (Election of 2004), 0.00%, 8/1/29

    1,500        844,620   

Riverside County Community College District, CA, (Election of 2004), 0.00%, 8/1/30

    1,250        664,575   

San Bernardino Community College District, CA, 4.00%, 8/1/30(1)(2)

    10,000        10,474,300   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  

General Obligations (continued)

  

Springfield School District No. 19, Lane County, OR, 0.00%, 6/15/32

  $ 4,395      $ 2,264,216   

Tempe Union High School District No. 213, AZ, 4.00%, 7/1/29(1)(2)

    4,200        4,418,232   

Tempe Union High School District No. 213, AZ, 4.00%, 7/1/30(1)(2)

    4,350        4,545,098   

Texas, (Texas Transportation Commission), 4.00%, 10/1/31(1)(2)

    10,000        10,655,600   

University City, MO, School District, 0.00%, 2/15/32

    1,500        836,145   

University City, MO, School District, 0.00%, 2/15/33

    3,000        1,597,080   

Washington, 4.00%, 7/1/29(1)

    10,000        10,692,600   

Wylie Independent School District, TX, (PSF Guaranteed), 0.00%, 8/15/32

    2,500        1,335,725   
                 
  $ 80,784,722   
                 

Hospital — 14.0%

  

California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Providence Health & Services), 4.00%, 10/1/28(1)(2)

  $ 10,000      $ 10,549,500   

Delaware Health Facilities Authority, (Nanticoke Memorial Hospital), 5.00%, 7/1/28

    2,500        2,652,450   

Grand Traverse County, MI, Hospital Finance Authority, (Munson Healthcare), 4.00%, 7/1/29

    200        202,694   

Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Jordan Hospital), 5.375%, 10/1/28

    1,000        1,001,170   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Orange Regional Medical Center), 5.00%, 12/1/29(3)

    450        478,359   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Orange Regional Medical Center), 5.00%, 12/1/30(3)

    1,000        1,057,240   

Onondaga Civic Development Corp., NY, (St. Joseph’s Hospital Health Center), 4.50%, 7/1/32

    715        715,815   

Southeastern Ohio Port Authority, (Memorial Health System Obligated Group), 5.50%, 12/1/29

    985        1,059,328   

Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., TX, (Baylor Health Care System), 4.00%, 11/15/32(1)

    10,000        10,092,900   

Yavapai County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Yavapai Regional Medical Center), 5.00%, 8/1/28

    1,500        1,636,050   
                 
  $ 29,445,506   
                 

Housing — 8.2%

  

Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, SFMR, (AMT), 3.90%, 10/1/28(1)

  $ 5,500      $ 5,612,805   

Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, SFMR, (AMT), 4.20%, 10/1/33(1)

    1,500        1,550,310   

Virginia Housing Development Authority, 3.625%, 1/1/31(1)(2)

    10,000        10,027,900   
                 
  $ 17,191,015   
                 
 

 

  4   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

July 31, 2015

 

Portfolio of Investments (Unaudited) — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’somitted)
    Value  

Industrial Development Revenue — 7.1%

  

Illinois Finance Authority, (Peoples Gas Light and Coke Co.), 4.00%, 2/1/33

  $ 1,500      $ 1,516,740   

Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, (Cleco Power LLC), 4.25%, 12/1/38

    5,000        5,079,000   

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Covanta Energy), (AMT), 4.875%, 11/1/27(3)

    2,500        2,558,650   

Matagorda County, TX, Navigation District No. 1, (AEP Texas Central Co.), Series 2008-1, 4.00%, 6/1/30

    1,155        1,173,619   

Matagorda County, TX, Navigation District No. 1, (AEP Texas Central Co.), Series 2008-2, 4.00%, 6/1/30

    3,000        3,048,360   

New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Continental Airlines), Series 2000A, (AMT), 5.625%, 11/15/30

    500        567,335   

New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Continental Airlines), Series 2000B, (AMT), 5.625%, 11/15/30

    855        955,633   
                 
  $ 14,899,337   
                 

Insured – Electric Utilities — 3.1%

  

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (AGM), 0.71%, 7/1/29(4)

  $ 2,000      $ 1,423,860   

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/29

    500        463,370   

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/30

    5,000        4,621,450   
                 
  $ 6,508,680   
                 

Insured – General Obligations — 3.9%

  

Grossmont Union High School District, CA, (Election of 2008), (AGM), 0.00%, 8/1/29

  $ 4,000      $ 2,206,760   

Irvington Township, NJ, (AGM), 5.00%, 7/15/30

    1,875        2,108,006   

Luzerne County, PA, (AGM), 5.00%, 11/15/29

    2,000        2,209,880   

McHenry County, IL, Community Unit School District No. 12, (AGM), 4.25%, 1/1/29

    1,230        1,242,534   

Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, (NPFG), 6.00%, 7/1/28

    500        500,670   
                 
  $ 8,267,850   
                 

Insured – Industrial Development Revenue — 2.0%

  

Massachusetts Port Authority, (Delta Airlines, Inc.), (AMBAC), (AMT), 5.00%, 1/1/27

  $ 4,200      $ 4,212,936   
                 
  $ 4,212,936   
                 

Insured – Special Tax Revenue — 1.3%

  

Puerto Rico Convention Center District Authority, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 7/1/31

  $ 1,475      $ 1,234,811   

Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/35

    1,115        250,753   

Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 5.50%, 7/1/28

    1,480        1,367,209   
                 
  $ 2,852,773   
                 
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’somitted)
    Value  

Insured – Transportation — 3.7%

  

Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, CA, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 10/1/31

  $ 5,805      $ 2,166,658   

Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, CA, (AGM), 5.625%, (0.00% until 1/15/24), 1/15/32

    795        616,276   

New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (The Goethals Bridge Replacement), (AGM), (AMT), 5.00%, 1/1/31

    1,340        1,479,749   

Ohio, (Portsmouth Gateway Group, LLC), (AGM), (AMT), 5.00%, 12/31/29

    1,125        1,262,329   

Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGM), 5.50%, 7/1/31

    1,000        1,003,220   

Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/20

    1,625        1,198,892   
                 
  $ 7,727,124   
                 

Insured – Water and Sewer — 2.3%

  

Jefferson County, AL, Sewer Revenue, (AGM), 0.00%, 10/1/27

  $ 875      $ 509,530   

Jefferson County, AL, Sewer Revenue, (AGM), 0.00%, 10/1/29

    1,225        616,702   

Jefferson County, AL, Sewer Revenue, (AGM), 0.00%, 10/1/30

    1,045        483,511   

Jefferson County, AL, Sewer Revenue, (AGM), 0.00%, 10/1/33

    5,870        2,210,466   

Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, (AGC), 5.00%, 7/1/28

    1,000        987,230   
                 
  $ 4,807,439   
                 

Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 0.5%

  

Michigan Strategic Fund, (Facility for Rare Isotope Beams), 4.00%, 3/1/31

  $ 1,000      $ 1,028,540   
                 
  $ 1,028,540   
                 

Other Revenue — 6.4%

  

Oregon Department of Administrative Services, Lottery Revenue, 4.00%, 4/1/29(1)

  $ 10,000      $ 10,673,000   

Salt Verde Financial Corp., AZ, Senior Gas Revenue, 5.00%, 12/1/32

    2,460        2,719,702   
                 
  $ 13,392,702   
                 

Senior Living / Life Care — 5.4%

  

Harris County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., TX, (Brazos Presbyterian Homes, Inc.), 5.75%, 1/1/28

  $ 140      $ 157,689   

Lancaster Industrial Development Authority, PA, (Garden Spot Village), 5.375%, 5/1/28

    600        643,380   

Lorain County Port Authority, OH, (Kendal at Oberlin), 5.00%, 11/15/30

    1,250        1,348,812   
 

 

  5   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

July 31, 2015

 

Portfolio of Investments (Unaudited) — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  

Senior Living / Life Care (continued)

  

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (North Hill Communities), 4.50%, 11/15/18(3)

  $ 470      $ 470,362   

Multnomah County, OR, Hospital Facilities Authority, (Mirabella at South Waterfront), 5.125%, 10/1/34

    1,500        1,620,585   

New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (United Methodist Homes of New Jersey), 4.00%, 7/1/27

    765        763,195   

New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (United Methodist Homes of New Jersey), 4.00%, 7/1/28

    910        897,333   

Palm Beach County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Sinai Residences of Boca Raton), 7.25%, 6/1/34

    1,060        1,206,354   

Public Finance Authority, WI, (Church Home of Hartford, Inc.), 5.00%, 9/1/25(3)

    1,200        1,273,140   

Savannah, GA, Economic Development Authority, (Marshes of Skidaway Island), 6.00%, 1/1/24

    500        556,490   

Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., TX, (Trinity Terrace), 5.00%, 10/1/29

    1,000        1,078,840   

Warren County, OH, (Otterbein Homes Obligated Group), 5.00%, 7/1/28

    1,200        1,325,232   
                 
  $ 11,341,412   
                 

Special Tax Revenue — 16.7%

  

New York Dormitory Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, 4.00%, 3/15/30(1)

  $ 10,000      $ 10,779,100   

New York Urban Development Corp., Personal Income Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 3/15/30(1)

    12,000        13,885,080   

Scottsdale Municipal Property Corp., AZ, Excise Tax Revenue, 4.00%, 7/1/30(1)

    2,000        2,147,320   

Scottsdale Municipal Property Corp., AZ, Excise Tax Revenue, 4.00%, 7/1/31(1)

    5,680        6,033,580   

Scottsdale Municipal Property Corp., AZ, Excise Tax Revenue, 4.00%, 7/1/32(1)

    2,120        2,239,080   
                 
  $ 35,084,160   
                 

Student Loan — 4.1%

  

Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, (AMT), 4.125%, 1/1/29

  $ 2,000      $ 1,998,260   

Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, (AMT), 5.00%, 1/1/27

    3,000        3,300,120   

New Jersey Higher Education Student Assistance Authority, Series 2013-1A, (AMT), 4.00%, 12/1/28

    2,000        2,022,560   

New Jersey Higher Education Student Assistance Authority, Series 2015-1A, (AMT), 4.00%, 12/1/28

    1,310        1,310,079   
                 
  $ 8,631,019   
                 
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  

Transportation — 16.7%

  

Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, CA, 5.90%, (0.00% until 1/15/24), 1/15/27

  $ 2,000      $ 1,488,140   

Grand Parkway Transportation Corp., TX, 4.95%, (0.00% until 10/1/23), 10/1/29

    800        633,248   

Grand Parkway Transportation Corp., TX, 5.05%, (0.00% until 10/1/23), 10/1/30

    1,500        1,183,560   

Grand Parkway Transportation Corp., TX, 5.20%, (0.00% until 10/1/23), 10/1/31

    2,000        1,576,380   

Houston, TX, (United Airlines, Inc.), (AMT), 5.00%, 7/1/29

    1,470        1,541,045   

Kentucky Public Transportation Infrastructure Authority, (Downtown Crossing Project), 0.00%, 7/1/28

    1,240        614,432   

Mid-Bay Bridge Authority, FL, 5.00%, 10/1/29

    2,725        3,020,335   

New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, 0.00%, 12/15/29

    10,000        4,778,300   

Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AMT), 4.00%, 7/15/36(1)(2)

    10,000        10,180,686   

Route 460 Funding Corp., VA, 0.00%, 7/1/29

    2,880        1,513,872   

Route 460 Funding Corp., VA, 0.00%, 7/1/30

    2,670        1,316,871   

Route 460 Funding Corp., VA, 0.00%, 7/1/31

    3,000        1,402,410   

South Jersey Transportation Authority, NJ, 5.00%, 11/1/30

    1,000        1,075,020   

Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, NY, 0.00%, 11/15/29

    3,165        1,935,113   

Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, NY, 0.00%, 11/15/31

    5,000        2,793,250   
                 
  $ 35,052,662   
                 

Water and Sewer — 6.8%

  

Detroit, MI, Water Supply System, 5.25%, 7/1/27

  $ 1,000      $ 1,085,540   

Michigan Finance Authority, (Detroit Water and Sewerage Department), 5.00%, 7/1/30

    5,000        5,418,550   

Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District, 4.00%, 11/15/33(1)(2)

    7,500        7,789,725   
                 
    $ 14,293,815   
                 

Total Tax-Exempt Municipal Securities — 158.6%
(identified cost $325,899,287)

   

  $ 333,329,555   
                 
Taxable Municipal Securities — 2.0%   
   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  

General Obligations — 2.0%

  

Atlantic City, NJ, 7.00%, 3/1/28

  $ 3,115      $ 3,179,294   

Chicago, IL, 7.375%, 1/1/33

    1,000        1,008,160   
                 

Total Taxable Municipal Securities — 2.0%
(identified cost $4,044,030)

   

 

$

4,187,454

  

                 
 

 

  6   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

July 31, 2015

 

Portfolio of Investments (Unaudited) — continued

 

 

Institutional MuniFund Term Preferred Shares — 0.9%   
   
Security   Shares     Value  

Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund, (AMT), 0.92%, 11/1/18(3)(5)

    400      $ 2,000,400   
                 

Total Institutional MuniFund Term Preferred
Shares — 0.9%
(identified cost $2,000,000)

   

  $ 2,000,400   
                 

Total Investments — 161.5%
(identified cost $331,943,317)

   

  $ 339,517,409   
                 

Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (61.5)%

  

  $ (129,306,549
                 

Net Assets — 100.0%

  

  $ 210,210,860   
                 

The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.

 

AGC     Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM     Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMBAC     AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT     Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
NPFG     National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
PSF     Permanent School Fund
SFMR     Single Family Mortgage Revenue

At July 31, 2015, the concentration of the Trust’s investments in the various states and territories, determined as a percentage of total investments, is as follows:

 

New York      12.3%   
Texas      11.7%   
Arizona      10.8%   
Others, representing less than 10% individually      65.2%   

The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at July 31, 2015, 10.1% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution or financial guaranty assurance agency ranged from 0.3% to 5.1% of total investments.

 

(1) 

Security represents the municipal bond held by a trust that issues residual interest bonds (see Note 1I).

 

(2) 

Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged as collateral for residual interest bond transactions. The aggregate value of such collateral is $29,335,457.

 

(3) 

Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in certain transactions (normally to qualified institutional buyers) and remain exempt from registration. At July 31, 2015, the aggregate value of these securities is $7,838,151 or 3.7% of the Trust’s net assets.

 

(4) 

Variable rate security. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at July 31, 2015.

(5) 

Variable rate security. The stated dividend rate represents the rate in effect at July 31, 2015. Maturity date represents the mandatory redemption date. Each share represents $5,000 par value.

 

 

  7   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

July 31, 2015

 

Statement of Assets and Liabilities (Unaudited)

 

 

Assets   July 31, 2015  

Investments, at value (identified cost, $331,943,317)

  $ 339,517,409   

Cash

    327,168   

Interest receivable

    2,544,203   

Receivable for investments sold

    180,003   

Total assets

  $ 342,568,783   
Liabilities        

Payable for floating rate notes issued

  $ 131,935,000   

Payable to affiliate:

 

Investment adviser and administration fee

    173,069   

Interest expense and fees payable

    190,167   

Accrued expenses

    59,687   

Total liabilities

  $ 132,357,923   

Net Assets

  $ 210,210,860   
Sources of Net Assets        

Common shares, $0.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized

  $ 108,325   

Additional paid-in capital

    206,737,247   

Accumulated net realized loss

    (6,605,148

Accumulated undistributed net investment income

    2,396,344   

Net unrealized appreciation

    7,574,092   

Net Assets

  $ 210,210,860   
Common Shares Outstanding     10,832,544   
Net Asset Value        

Net assets ÷ common shares issued and outstanding

  $ 19.41   

 

  8   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

July 31, 2015

 

Statement of Operations (Unaudited)

 

 

Investment Income   Six Months Ended
July 31, 2015
 

Interest

  $ 6,592,511   

Dividends

    5,970   

Total investment income

  $ 6,598,481   
Expenses        

Investment adviser and administration fee

  $ 1,024,543   

Trustees’ fees and expenses

    9,626   

Custodian fee

    50,261   

Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees

    9,795   

Legal and accounting services

    28,589   

Printing and postage

    12,670   

Interest expense and fees

    421,135   

Miscellaneous

    25,181   

Total expenses

  $ 1,581,800   

Deduct —

 

Reduction of custodian fee

  $ 111   

Total expense reductions

  $ 111   

Net expenses

  $ 1,581,689   

Net investment income

  $ 5,016,792   
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)        

Net realized gain (loss) —

 

Investment transactions

  $ 916,406   

Net realized gain

  $ 916,406   

Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) —

 

Investments

  $ (14,848,321

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)

  $ (14,848,321

Net realized and unrealized loss

  $ (13,931,915

Net decrease in net assets from operations

  $ (8,915,123

 

  9   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

July 31, 2015

 

Statements of Changes in Net Assets

 

 

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets  

Six Months Ended

July 31, 2015
(Unaudited)

   

Year Ended

January 31, 2015

 

From operations —

   

Net investment income

  $ 5,016,792      $ 10,038,728   

Net realized gain on investment transactions

    916,406        3,976,143   

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments

    (14,848,321     34,843,047   

Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations

  $ (8,915,123   $ 48,857,918   

Distributions to shareholders —

   

From net investment income

  $ (4,603,810   $ (9,301,051

Total distributions to shareholders

  $ (4,603,810   $ (9,301,051

Capital share transactions —

   

Cost of shares repurchased (see Note 5)

  $      $ (3,421,465

Net decrease in net assets from capital share transactions

  $      $ (3,421,465

Net increase (decrease) in net assets

  $ (13,518,933   $ 36,135,402   
Net Assets                

At beginning of period

  $ 223,729,793      $ 187,594,391   

At end of period

  $ 210,210,860      $ 223,729,793   
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
included in net assets
               

At end of period

  $ 2,396,344      $ 1,983,362   

 

  10   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

July 31, 2015

 

Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

 

 

Cash Flows From Operating Activities  

Six Months Ended

July 31, 2015

 

Net decrease in net assets from operations

  $ (8,915,123

Adjustments to reconcile net decrease in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

Investments purchased

    (45,765,290

Investments sold

    45,752,944   

Net amortization/accretion of premium (discount)

    (646,903

Decrease in interest receivable

    37,898   

Decrease in payable to affiliate for investment adviser and administration fee

    (1,287

Increase in interest expense and fees payable

    8,074   

Decrease in accrued expenses

    (30,767

Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation from investments

    14,848,321   

Net realized gain from investments

    (916,406

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $ 4,371,461   
Cash Flows From Financing Activities        

Distributions paid, net of reinvestments

  $ (4,603,810

Proceeds from secured borrowings

    7,350,000   

Repayment of secured borrowings

    (6,670,000

Decrease in due to custodian

    (120,483

Net cash used in financing activities

  $ (4,044,293

Net increase in cash

  $ 327,168   

Cash at beginning of period

  $   

Cash at end of period

  $ 327,168   
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:        

Cash paid for interest and fees

  $ 413,061   

 

  11   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

July 31, 2015

 

Financial Highlights

 

 

     Six Months Ended
July 31, 2015
(Unaudited)
    Year Ended
January 31, 2015
   

Period Ended

January 31,  2014(1)

 

Net asset value — Beginning of period

  $ 20.650      $ 17.000      $ 19.100 (2) 
Income (Loss) From Operations                        

Net investment income(3)

  $ 0.463      $ 0.917      $ 0.716   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)

    (1.278     3.546        (2.188

Total income (loss) from operations

  $ (0.815   $ 4.463      $ (1.472
Less Distributions                        

From net investment income

  $ (0.425   $ (0.850   $ (0.567

Total distributions

  $ (0.425   $ (0.850   $ (0.567

Offering costs charged to paid-in capital(3)

  $      $      $ (0.040

Discount related to exercise of underwriters’ over-allotment option(3)

  $      $      $ (0.021

Anti-dilutive effect of share repurchase program (see Note 5)(3)

  $      $ 0.037      $   

Net asset value — End of period

  $ 19.410      $ 20.650      $ 17.000   

Market Value — End of period

  $ 17.280      $ 18.320      $ 15.900   

Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(4)

    (3.69 )%(5)       27.68     (7.52 )%(5)(6)  

Total Investment Return on Market Value(4)

    (3.35 )%(5)       21.11     (13.50 )%(5)(6)  
Ratios/Supplemental Data                        

Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted)

  $ 210,211      $ 223,730      $ 187,594   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets):

     

Expenses excluding interest and fees(7)

    1.10 %(8)      1.09     1.19 %(8) 

Interest and fee expense(9)

    0.40 %(8)      0.37     0.43 %(8) 

Total expenses(7)

    1.50 %(8)      1.46     1.62 %(8) 

Net investment income

    4.77 %(8)      4.84     5.02 %(8) 

Portfolio Turnover

    11 %(5)      43     58 %(5) 

 

(1) 

For the period from the start of business, March 28, 2013, to January 31, 2014.

 

(2) 

Net asset value at beginning of period reflects the deduction of the sales charge of $0.90 per share paid by the shareholders from the $20.00 offering price.

 

(3) 

Computed using average shares outstanding.

 

(4) 

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested. Distributions are assumed to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Trust’s dividend reinvestment plan.

 

(5) 

Not annualized.

 

(6) 

Total investment return on net asset value is calculated assuming a purchase at the offering price of $20.00 less the sales load of $0.90 per share paid by the shareholder on the first day and a sale at the net asset value on the last day of the period reported with all distributions reinvested. Total investment return on market value is calculated assuming a purchase at the offering price of $20.00 less the sales load of $0.90 per share paid by the shareholder on the first day and a sale at the current market price on the last day of the period reported with all distributions reinvested.

 

(7) 

Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%.

 

(8) 

Annualized.

 

(9) 

Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions (see Note 1H).

 

  12   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

July 31, 2015

 

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

 

 

1  Significant Accounting Policies

Eaton Vance Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust (the Trust) is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a diversified, closed-end management investment company. The Trust’s investment objective is to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax. The Trust has a term of fifteen years and currently intends to cease its investment operations on or about June 30, 2028 and thereafter liquidate and distribute its net assets to holders of the Trust’s common shares.

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Trust. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP). The Trust is an investment company and follows accounting and reporting guidance in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946.

A  Investment Valuation — The following methodologies are used to determine the market value or fair value of investments.

Debt Obligations. Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days) are generally valued on the basis of valuations provided by third party pricing services, as derived from such services’ pricing models. Inputs to the models may include, but are not limited to, reported trades, executable bid and asked prices, broker/dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, interest rates, anticipated prepayments, benchmark curves or information pertaining to the issuer, as well as industry and economic events. The pricing services may use a matrix approach, which considers information regarding securities with similar characteristics to determine the valuation for a security. Short-term obligations purchased with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value.

Institutional MuniFund Term Preferred Shares. Institutional MuniFund Term Preferred Shares are valued in the same manner as debt obligations described above.

Fair Valuation. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Trust in a manner that fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Trust might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker/dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.

B  Investment Transactions and Related Income — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount. Dividends on Institutional MuniFund Term Preferred Shares are accrued daily based on rates that reset weekly.

C  Federal Taxes — The Trust’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its taxable, if any, and tax-exempt net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. The Trust intends to satisfy conditions which will enable it to designate distributions from the interest and dividend income generated by its investments in non-taxable municipal securities, which are exempt from regular federal income tax when received by the Trust, as exempt-interest dividends. The portion of such interest, if any, earned on private activity bonds issued after August 7, 1986, may be considered a tax preference item to shareholders.

As of July 31, 2015, the Trust had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. The Trust files a U.S. federal income tax return annually after its fiscal year-end, which is subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a period of three years from the date of filing.

D  Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Trust. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Trust maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Trust’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.

E  Legal Fees — Legal fees and other related expenses incurred as part of negotiations of the terms and requirement of capital infusions, or that are expected to result in the restructuring of, or a plan of reorganization for, an investment are recorded as realized losses. Ongoing expenditures to protect or enhance an investment are treated as operating expenses.

F  Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

G  Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Trust. Under Massachusetts law, if certain conditions prevail, shareholders of a Massachusetts business trust (such as the Trust) could be deemed to have personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. However, the Trust’s Declaration of Trust contains an

 

  13  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

July 31, 2015

 

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) — continued

 

 

express disclaimer of liability on the part of Trust shareholders and the By-laws provide that the Trust shall assume the defense on behalf of any Trust shareholders. Moreover, the By-laws also provide for indemnification out of Trust property of any shareholder held personally liable solely by reason of being or having been a shareholder for all loss or expense arising from such liability. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Trust enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Trust’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Trust that have not yet occurred.

H  Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities Held — The Trust may invest in residual interest bonds, also referred to as inverse floating rate securities, whereby the Trust may sell a variable or fixed rate bond for cash to a Special-Purpose Vehicle (the SPV), (which is generally organized as a trust), while at the same time, buying a residual interest in the assets and cash flows of the SPV. The bond is deposited into the SPV with the same CUSIP number as the bond sold to the SPV by the Trust, and which may have been, but is not required to be, the bond purchased from the Trust (the Bond). The SPV also issues floating rate notes (Floating Rate Notes) which are sold to third-parties. The residual interest bond held by the Trust gives the Trust the right (1) to cause the holders of the Floating Rate Notes to generally tender their notes at par, and (2) to have the Bond held by the SPV transferred to the Trust, thereby terminating the SPV. Should the Trust exercise such right, it would generally pay the SPV the par amount due on the Floating Rate Notes and exchange the residual interest bond for the underlying Bond. Pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishment of liabilities, the Trust accounts for the transaction described above as a secured borrowing by including the Bond in its Portfolio of Investments and the Floating Rate Notes as a liability under the caption “Payable for floating rate notes issued” in its Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Floating Rate Notes have interest rates that generally reset weekly and their holders have the option to tender their notes to the SPV for redemption at par at each reset date. Accordingly, the fair value of the payable for floating rate notes issued approximates its carrying value. If measured at fair value, the payable for floating rate notes would have been considered as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy (see Note 6) at July 31, 2015. Interest expense related to the Trust’s liability with respect to Floating Rate Notes is recorded as incurred. The SPV may be terminated by the Trust, as noted above, or by the occurrence of certain termination events as defined in the trust agreement, such as a downgrade in the credit quality of the underlying Bond, bankruptcy of or payment failure by the issuer of the underlying Bond, the inability to remarket Floating Rate Notes that have been tendered due to insufficient buyers in the market, or the failure by the SPV to obtain renewal of the liquidity agreement under which liquidity support is provided for the Floating Rate Notes up to one year. At July 31, 2015, the amount of the Trust’s Floating Rate Notes outstanding and the related collateral were $131,935,000 and $192,814,770, respectively. The range of interest rates on the Floating Rate Notes outstanding at July 31, 2015 was 0.02% to 0.13%. For the six months ended July 31, 2015, the Trust’s average Floating Rate Notes outstanding and the average interest rate (annualized) including fees were $130,372,403 and 0.65%, respectively.

In certain circumstances, the Trust may enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements with brokers by which the Trust agrees to reimburse the broker for the difference between the liquidation value of the Bond held by the SPV and the liquidation value of the Floating Rate Notes, as well as any shortfalls in interest cash flows. The Trust had no shortfalls as of July 31, 2015.

The Trust may also purchase residual interest bonds in a secondary market transaction without first owning the underlying bond. Such transactions are not required to be treated as secured borrowings. Shortfall agreements, if any, related to residual interest bonds purchased in a secondary market transaction are disclosed in the Portfolio of Investments.

The Trust’s investment policies and restrictions expressly permit investments in residual interest bonds. Such bonds typically offer the potential for yields exceeding the yields available on fixed rate bonds with comparable credit quality and maturity. These securities tend to underperform the market for fixed rate bonds in a rising long-term interest rate environment, but tend to outperform the market for fixed rate bonds when long-term interest rates decline. The value and income of residual interest bonds are generally more volatile than that of a fixed rate bond. The Trust’s investment policies do not allow the Trust to borrow money except as permitted by the 1940 Act. Management believes that the Trust’s restrictions on borrowing money and issuing senior securities (other than as specifically permitted) do not apply to Floating Rate Notes issued by the SPV and included as a liability in the Trust’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. As secured indebtedness issued by an SPV, Floating Rate Notes are distinct from the borrowings and senior securities to which the Trust’s restrictions apply. Residual interest bonds held by the Trust are securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.

On December 10, 2013, five U.S. federal agencies published final rules implementing section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Volcker Rule”). The Volcker Rule prohibits banking entities from engaging in proprietary trading of certain instruments and limits such entities’ investments in, and relationships with, covered funds (such as SPVs), as defined in the rules. The compliance date for the Volcker Rule for certain covered funds was July 21, 2015 while for other covered funds the compliance date is July 21, 2016. The Volcker Rule precludes banking entities and their affiliates from (i) sponsoring residual interest bond programs (as such programs are presently structured) and (ii) continuing relationships with or services for existing residual interest bond programs. As a result, residual interest bond trusts will need to be restructured or unwound. The effects of the Volcker Rule may make it more difficult for the Trust to maintain current or desired levels of leverage and may cause the Trust to incur additional expenses to maintain its leverage.

As of July 31, 2015, the Trust’s investments in residual interest bonds that were required to be compliant with the Volcker Rule by July 21, 2015 were restructured by the required compliance date. Legal and restructuring fees incurred in connection with residual interest bond trusts that were restructured during the six months ended July 31, 2015 have been recorded as interest expense.

I  Statement of Cash Flows — The cash amount shown in the Statement of Cash Flows of the Trust is the amount included in the Trust’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities and represents the unrestricted cash on hand at its custodian and does not include any short-term investments.

 

  14  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

July 31, 2015

 

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) — continued

 

 

J  Interim Financial Statements — The interim financial statements relating to July 31, 2015 and for the six months then ended have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm, but in the opinion of the Trust’s management, reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial statements.

2  Distributions to Shareholders and Income Tax Information

The Trust intends to make monthly distributions of net investment income to common shareholders. In addition, at least annually, the Trust intends to distribute all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions to shareholders are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP. As required by U.S. GAAP, only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits are reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.

At January 31, 2015, the Trust, for federal income tax purposes, had deferred capital losses of $7,623,864 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Trust of any liability for federal income or excise tax. The deferred capital losses are treated as arising on the first day of the Trust’s next taxable year and retain the same short-term or long-term character as when originally deferred. Of the deferred capital losses at January 31, 2015, $7,623,864 are short-term.

The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Trust at July 31, 2015, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:

 

Aggregate cost

  $ 199,878,332   

Gross unrealized appreciation

  $ 9,312,346   

Gross unrealized depreciation

    (1,608,269

Net unrealized appreciation

  $ 7,704,077   

3  Investment Adviser and Administration Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates

The investment adviser and administration fee is earned by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) as compensation for investment advisory and administrative services rendered to the Trust. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.60% of the Trust’s average daily total managed assets and is payable monthly. Average daily total managed assets include the principal amount of any indebtedness for money borrowed, including debt securities issued by the Trust. Average daily total managed assets are calculated by adding to net assets the amount payable by the Trust to floating rate note holders. For the six months ended July 31, 2015, the investment adviser and administration fee was $1,024,543.

Trustees and officers of the Trust who are members of EVM’s organization receive remuneration for their services to the Trust out of the investment adviser and administration fee. Trustees of the Trust who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the six months ended July 31, 2015, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Trust are officers of EVM.

4  Purchases and Sales of Investments

Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, aggregated $39,541,483 and $42,962,387, respectively, for the six months ended July 31, 2015.

5  Common Shares of Beneficial Interest

The Trust may issue common shares pursuant to its dividend reinvestment plan. There were no common shares issued by the Trust for the six months ended July 31, 2015 and the year ended January 31, 2015.

On November 11, 2013, the Board of Trustees of the Trust authorized the repurchase by the Trust of up to 10% of its then currently outstanding common shares in open-market transactions at a discount to net asset value (NAV). The repurchase program does not obligate the Trust to purchase a specific amount of shares. There were no repurchases of common shares by the Trust for the six months ended July 31, 2015. During the year ended January 31, 2015, the Trust repurchased 199,300 of its common shares under the share repurchase program at a cost, including brokerage commissions, of $3,421,465 and an average price per share of $17.17. The weighted average discount per share to NAV on these repurchases amounted to 10.54% for the year ended January 31, 2015.

 

  15  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

July 31, 2015

 

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) — continued

 

 

6  Fair Value Measurements

Under generally accepted accounting principles for fair value measurements, a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, is used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.

 

 

Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments

 

 

Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)

 

 

Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)

In cases where the inputs used to measure fair value fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level disclosed is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

At July 31, 2015, the hierarchy of inputs used in valuing the Trust’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:

 

Asset Description   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

Tax-Exempt Municipal Securities

  $         —       $ 333,329,555       $         —       $ 333,329,555   

Taxable Municipal Securities

            4,187,454                 4,187,454   

Institutional MuniFund Term Preferred Shares

            2,000,400                 2,000,400   

Total Investments

  $       $ 339,517,409       $       $ 339,517,409   

The Trust held no investments or other financial instruments as of January 31, 2015 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs. At July 31, 2015, there were no investments transferred between Level 1 and Level 2 during the six months then ended.

 

  16  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

July 31, 2015

 

Board of Trustees’ Contract Approval

 

 

Overview of the Contract Review Process

The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuation is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.

At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the registered investment companies advised, administered and/or distributed by Eaton Vance Management or its affiliates (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2015, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of its Contract Review Committee, which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished by each adviser to the Eaton Vance Funds (including information specifically requested by the Board) for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held between February and April 2015. The Contract Review Committee also considered information received at prior meetings of the Board and its committees, as relevant to its annual evaluation of the investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements.

The information that the Board considered included, among other things, the following:

Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses

 

 

A report from an independent data provider comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds as identified by the data provider (“comparable funds”);

 

 

A report from an independent data provider comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds;

 

 

A report from an independent data provider comparing the investment performance of each fund (including, where relevant, yield data, Sharpe ratios and information ratios) to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods;

 

 

Data regarding investment performance in comparison to benchmark indices and customized peer groups identified by the adviser in consultation with the Board;

 

 

For each fund, comparative information concerning the fees charged and the services provided by each adviser in managing other accounts (including mutual funds, other collective investment funds and institutional accounts) using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing such fund;

 

 

Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund;

Information about Portfolio Management and Trading

 

 

Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes it employs;

 

 

The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes;

 

 

Information about each adviser’s policies and practices with respect to trading, including each adviser’s processes for monitoring best execution of portfolio transactions;

 

 

Information about the allocation of brokerage transactions and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through client commission arrangements and policies with respect to “soft dollars”;

 

 

Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund;

Information about each Adviser

 

 

Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser;

 

 

Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts;

 

The Code of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes;

 

Policies and procedures relating to proxy voting and the handling of corporate actions and class actions;

 

Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance;

 

Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates;

 

A description of Eaton Vance Management’s procedures for overseeing third party advisers and sub-advisers, including with respect to regulatory and compliance issues, investment management and other matters;

 

  17  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

July 31, 2015

 

Board of Trustees’ Contract Approval — continued

 

 

Other Relevant Information

 

 

Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates;

 

 

Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and

 

 

The terms of each investment advisory agreement.

Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2015, with respect to one or more funds, the Board met nine times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met eight, seventeen, seven, eleven and thirteen times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees participated in investment and performance reviews with the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to each fund, and considered the investment and trading strategies used in pursuing each fund’s investment objective, including, where relevant, the use of derivative instruments, as well as processes for monitoring best execution of portfolio transactions and risk management techniques. The Board and its Committees also evaluated issues pertaining to industry and regulatory developments, compliance procedures, fund governance and other issues with respect to the funds, and received and participated in reports and presentations provided by Eaton Vance Management and other fund advisers with respect to such matters. In addition to the formal meetings of the Board and its Committees, the Independent Trustees hold regular teleconferences in between meetings to discuss, among other topics, matters relating to the continuation of investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements.

For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of investment advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.

The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each investment advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each investment advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each investment advisory and sub-advisory agreement. In evaluating each investment advisory and sub-advisory agreement, including the specific fee structures and other terms of the agreements, the Contract Review Committee was informed by multiple years of analysis and discussion among the Independent Trustees and the Eaton Vance Funds’ advisers and sub-advisers.

Results of the Process

Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuation of the investment advisory and administrative agreement of Eaton Vance Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust (formerly Eaton Vance Municipal Income Term Trust) (the “Fund”) with Eaton Vance Management (the “Adviser”), including its fee structure, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory and administrative agreement for the Fund.

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services

In considering whether to approve the investment advisory and administrative agreement of the Fund, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by the Adviser.

The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Fund, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Fund. In particular, the Board considered, where relevant, the abilities and experience of such investment personnel in analyzing factors such as credit risk, tax efficiency, and special considerations relevant to investing in municipal bonds. The Board considered the Adviser’s large municipal bond team, which includes portfolio managers and credit specialists who provide services to the Fund. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, as well as the compensation methods of the Adviser and other factors, such as the reputation and resources of the Adviser to recruit and retain investment personnel. In addition, the Board considered the time and attention devoted to the Fund by senior management, as well as the infrastructure, operational capabilities and support staff in place to assist in the management of the Fund, including the provision of administrative services.

The Board considered the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio

 

  18  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

July 31, 2015

 

Board of Trustees’ Contract Approval — continued

 

 

valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also considered the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests in recent years from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed the Adviser and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds.

After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory and administrative agreement.

Fund Performance

The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to that of comparable funds and appropriate benchmark indices and assessed the Fund’s performance on the basis of total return and current income return. The Board’s review included comparative performance data for the one-year period ended September 30, 2014 for the Fund. The Board considered, among other things, the Adviser’s efforts to generate competitive levels of tax exempt current income through investments that, relative to its comparable funds, focus on higher quality municipal bonds with longer maturities. The Board concluded that the performance of the Fund was satisfactory.

Management Fees and Expenses

The Board considered contractual fee rates payable by the Fund for advisory and administrative services (referred to collectively as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the Fund’s management fees and total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2014, as compared to those of comparable funds, before and after giving effect to any undertaking to waive fees or reimburse expenses. The Board also considered factors that had an impact on Fund expense ratios, as identified by management in response to inquiries from the Contract Review Committee, as well as actions taken by management in recent years to reduce expenses at the fund complex level.

After considering the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services are reasonable.

Profitability

The Board considered the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with their relationships with the Fund, including the benefits of research services that may be available to the Adviser as a result of securities transactions effected for the Fund and other investment advisory clients.

The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.

Economies of Scale

In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the Fund currently shares in the benefits from economies of scale. The Board also considered the fact that the Fund is not continuously offered and that the Fund’s assets are not expected to increase materially in the foreseeable future. The Board concluded that, in light of the level of the Adviser’s profits with respect to the Fund, the implementation of breakpoints in the advisory fee schedule is not warranted at this time.

 

  19  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

July 31, 2015

 

Officers and Trustees

 

 

Officers of the Trust

 

 

Payson F. Swaffield

President

Maureen A. Gemma

Vice President, Secretary and

Chief Legal Officer

James F. Kirchner

Treasurer

Paul M. O’Neil

Chief Compliance Officer

 

 

Trustees of the Trust

 

 

Ralph F. Verni

Chairman

Scott E. Eston

Thomas E. Faust Jr.*

Cynthia E. Frost

George J. Gorman

Valerie A. Mosley

William H. Park

Helen Frame Peters

Susan J. Sutherland**

Harriett Tee Taggart

 

 

* Interested Trustee

 

** Ms. Sutherland began serving as a Trustee effective May 1, 2015.

 

 

Number of Employees

The Trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a closed-end management investment company and has no employees.

Number of Shareholders

As of July 31, 2015, Trust records indicate that there are 2 registered shareholders and approximately 4,796 shareholders owning the Trust shares in street name, such as through brokers, banks, and financial intermediaries.

If you are a street name shareholder and wish to receive Trust reports directly, which contain important information about the Trust, please write or call:

Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.

Two International Place

Boston, MA 02110

1-800-262-1122

New York Stock Exchange symbol

The New York Stock Exchange symbol is ETX.

 

  20  


Eaton Vance Funds

 

IMPORTANT NOTICES

 

 

Privacy.  The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (“Privacy Policy”) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:

 

 

Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions.

 

 

None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker-dealers.

 

 

Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information.

 

 

We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com.

Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc., Eaton Vance Trust Company, Eaton Vance Management’s Real Estate Investment Group and Boston Management and Research. In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial advisor/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such advisor’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures. For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.

Delivery of Shareholder Documents.  The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders. Eaton Vance, or your financial advisor, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial advisor, otherwise. If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial advisor. Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial advisor.

Portfolio Holdings.  Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).

Proxy Voting.  From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122 and by accessing the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Share Repurchase Program.  The Fund’s Board of Trustees has approved a share repurchase program authorizing the Fund to repurchase up to 10% of its outstanding common shares as of the approved date in open-market transactions at a discount to net asset value. The repurchase program does not obligate the Fund to purchase a specific amount of shares. The Fund’s repurchase activity, including the number of shares purchased, average price and average discount to net asset value, is disclosed in the Fund’s annual and semi-annual reports to shareholders.

Additional Notice to Shareholders.  If applicable, a Fund may also redeem or purchase its outstanding preferred shares in order to maintain compliance with regulatory requirements, borrowing or rating agency requirements or for other purposes as it deems appropriate or necessary.

Closed-End Fund Information.  Eaton Vance closed-end funds make fund performance data and certain information about portfolio characteristics available on the Eaton Vance website shortly after the end of each month. Other information about the funds is available on the website. The funds’ net asset value per share is readily accessible on the Eaton Vance website. Portfolio holdings for the most recent month-end are also posted to the website approximately 30 days following the end of the month. This information is available at www.eatonvance.com on the fund information pages under “Individual Investors — Closed-End Funds”.

 

  21  


 

 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank


 

 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank


 

 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank


Investment Adviser and Administrator

Eaton Vance Management

Two International Place

Boston, MA 02110

Custodian

State Street Bank and Trust Company

State Street Financial Center, One Lincoln Street

Boston, MA 02111

Transfer Agent

American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC

6201 15th Avenue

Brooklyn, NY 11219

Fund Offices

Two International Place

Boston, MA 02110

 


LOGO

 

7013    7.31.15    


Item 2. Code of Ethics

Not required in this filing.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert

Not required in this filing.

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Not required in this filing.

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants

Not required in this filing.

Item 6. Schedule of Investments

Please see schedule of investments contained in the Report to Stockholders included under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies

Not required in this filing.

Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies

Craig R. Brandon is responsible for the overall and day-to-day management of the Trust’s investments. Mr. Brandon has been an Eaton Vance analyst since 1998 and a portfolio manager since 2004. He is Co-Director of the Municipal Investments Group and is a Vice President of Eaton Vance Management (“EVM” or “Eaton Vance”). This information is provided as of the date of filing of this report.

The following table shows, as of July 31, 2015, the number of accounts the portfolio manager managed in each of the listed categories and the total assets (in millions of dollars) in the accounts managed within each category. The table also shows the number of accounts with respect to which the advisory fee is based on the performance of the account, if any, and the total assets (in millions of dollars) in those accounts.

 

     Number of All
Accounts
     Total Assets of
All Accounts
     Number of
Accounts
Paying a
Performance Fee
     Total Assets
of Accounts
Paying a
Performance
Fee
 

Registered Investment Companies

     16       $ 5,645.6         0       $ 0   

Other Pooled Investment Vehicles

     0       $ 0         0       $ 0   

Other Accounts

     0       $ 0         0       $ 0   


The following table shows the dollar range of Fund shares beneficially owned by the portfolio manager as of July 31, 2015.

 

Portfolio Manager

   Dollar Range of Equity
Securities Owned in the Fund

Craig R. Brandon

   None

Potential for Conflicts of Interest. It is possible that conflicts of interest may arise in connection with a portfolio manager’s management of the Fund’s investments on the one hand and the investments of other accounts for which the portfolio manager is responsible on the other. For example, a portfolio manager may have conflicts of interest in allocating management time, resources and investment opportunities among the Fund and other accounts he or she advises. In addition, due to differences in the investment strategies or restrictions between the Fund and the other accounts, a portfolio manager may take action with respect to another account that differs from the action taken with respect to the Fund. In some cases, another account managed by a portfolio manager may compensate EVM based on the performance of the securities held by that account. The existence of such a performance based fee may create additional conflicts of interest for the portfolio manager in the allocation of management time, resources and investment opportunities. Whenever conflicts of interest arise, the portfolio manager will endeavor to exercise his or her discretion in a manner that he or she believes is equitable to all interested persons. EVM has adopted several policies and procedures designed to address these potential conflicts including a code of ethics and policies which govern EVM’s trading practices, including among other things the aggregation and allocation of trades among clients, brokerage allocation, cross trades and best execution.

Compensation Structure for EVM

Compensation of EVM’s portfolio managers and other investment professionals has three primary components: (1) a base salary, (2) an annual cash bonus, and (3) annual stock-based compensation consisting of options to purchase shares of EVC’s nonvoting common stock and restricted shares of EVC’s nonvoting common stock. EVM’s investment professionals also receive certain retirement, insurance and other benefits that are broadly available to EVM’s employees. Compensation of EVM’s investment professionals is reviewed primarily on an annual basis. Cash bonuses, stock-based compensation awards, and adjustments in base salary are typically paid or put into effect at or shortly after the October 31st fiscal year end of EVC.

Method to Determine Compensation. EVM compensates its portfolio managers based primarily on the scale and complexity of their portfolio responsibilities and the total return performance of managed funds and accounts versus the benchmark(s) stated in the prospectus, as well as an appropriate peer group (as described below). In addition to rankings within peer groups of funds on the basis of absolute performance, consideration may also be given to relative risk-adjusted performance. Risk-adjusted performance measures include, but are not limited to, the Sharpe Ratio. Performance is normally based on periods ending on the September 30th preceding fiscal year end. Fund performance is normally evaluated primarily versus peer groups of funds as determined by Lipper Inc. and/or Morningstar, Inc. When a fund’s peer group as determined by Lipper or Morningstar is deemed by EVM’s management not to provide a fair comparison, performance may instead be evaluated primarily against a custom peer group or market index. In evaluating the performance of a fund and its manager, primary emphasis is normally placed on three-year performance, with secondary consideration of performance over longer and shorter periods. For funds that are tax-managed or otherwise have an objective of after-tax returns, performance is measured net of taxes. For other funds, performance is evaluated on a pre-tax basis. For funds with an investment objective other than total return (such as current income), consideration will also be given to the fund’s success in achieving its objective. For managers responsible for multiple funds and accounts, investment performance is evaluated on an aggregate basis, based on averages or weighted averages among managed funds and accounts. Funds and accounts that have performance-based advisory fees are not accorded disproportionate weightings in measuring aggregate portfolio manager performance.


The compensation of portfolio managers with other job responsibilities (such as heading an investment group or providing analytical support to other portfolios) will include consideration of the scope of such responsibilities and the managers’ performance in meeting them.

EVM seeks to compensate portfolio managers commensurate with their responsibilities and performance, and competitive with other firms within the investment management industry. EVM participates in investment-industry compensation surveys and utilizes survey data as a factor in determining salary, bonus and stock-based compensation levels for portfolio managers and other investment professionals. Salaries, bonuses and stock-based compensation are also influenced by the operating performance of EVM and its parent company. The overall annual cash bonus pool is generally based on a substantially fixed percentage of pre-bonus adjusted operating income. While the salaries of EVM’s portfolio managers are comparatively fixed, cash bonuses and stock-based compensation may fluctuate significantly from year to year, based on changes in manager performance and other factors as described herein. For a high performing portfolio manager, cash bonuses and stock-based compensation may represent a substantial portion of total compensation.

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers

REGISTRANT PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Period*

   Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
     Average
Price Paid
per Share
     Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Programs
     Maximum Number of
Shares that May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Programs*
 

November 2013

     —           —           —           1,103,184   

December 2013

     —           —           —           1,103,184   

January 2014

     —           —           —           1,103,184   

February 2014

     —           —           —           1,103,184   

March 2014

     —           —           —           1,103,184   

April 2014

     —           —           —           1,103,184   

May 2014

     —           —           —           1,103,184   

June 2014

     —           —           —           1,103,184   

July 2014

     18,700         17.04         18,700         1,084,484   

August 2014

     115,500         17.09         115,500         968,984   

September 2014

     65,100         17.34         65,100         903,884   

October 2014

     —           —           —           903,884   

November 2014

     —           —           —           903,884   

December 2014

     —           —           —           903,884   

January 2015

     —           —           —           903,884   

February 2015

     —           —           —           903,884   

March 2015

     —           —           —           903,884   

April 2015

     —           —           —           903,884   

May 2015

     —           —           —           903,884   

June 2015

     —           —           —           903,884   

July 2015

     —           —           —           903,884   

Total

     199,300       $ 17.17         199,300      

 

* On November 11, 2013, the Fund’s Board of Trustees approved a share repurchase program authorizing the Fund to repurchase up to 10% of its then currently outstanding common shares in open-market transactions at a discount to net asset value. The repurchase program was announced on November 15, 2013.


Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No material changes.

Item 11. Controls and Procedures

(a) It is the conclusion of the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer that the effectiveness of the registrant’s current disclosure controls and procedures (such disclosure controls and procedures having been evaluated within 90 days of the date of this filing) provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been accumulated and communicated to the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12. Exhibits

 

(a)(1)    Registrant’s Code of Ethics – Not applicable (please see Item 2).
(a)(2)(i)    Treasurer’s Section 302 certification.
(a)(2)(ii)    President’s Section 302 certification.
(b)    Combined Section 906 certification.


Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Eaton Vance Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust

 

By:  

/s/ Payson F. Swaffield

  Payson F. Swaffield
  President

Date: September 15, 2015

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

By:  

/s/ James F. Kirchner

  James F. Kirchner
  Treasurer

Date: September 15, 2015

 

By:  

/s/ Payson F. Swaffield

  Payson F. Swaffield
  President

Date: September 15, 2015