cplform20f_2012.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing  

 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012
Commission File Number 1-32297

CPFL ENERGIA S.A.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

CPFL ENERGY INCORPORATED

The Federative Republic of Brazil

(Translation of registrant’s name into English)

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

Rua Gomes de Carvalho, 1,510, 14th floor - Suite 142
CEP 04547-005 Vila Olímpia - São Paulo, São Paulo
Federative Republic of Brazil
+55 11 3841-8507
(Address of principal executive offices)

Gustavo Estrella
+55 19 3756 8704 –
gustavoestrella@cpfl.com.br
Rodovia Engenheiro Miguel Noel Nascentes Burnier, 1,755, km 2,5 – Parque São Quirino – Campinas, São Paulo - 13088 140
Federative Republic of Brazil
(Name, telephone, e-mail and/or facsimile
number and address of company contact person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class:

Name of each exchange on which registered:

Common Shares, without par value*
American Depositary Shares (as evidenced by American Depositary Receipts), each representing 2 Common Shares

New York Stock Exchange

 

*Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None 

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:  None 

As of December 31, 2012, there were 962,274,260 common shares, without par value, outstanding

 


 
 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes    No  £ 

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes  £   No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes    No  £ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes  £   No  £   N/A 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non‑accelerated filer.  See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer    Accelerated Filer  £   Non‑accelerated Filer  £ 

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP  £   IFRS    Other  £ 

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

Item 17 £   Item 18  £   

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes  £   No 



 

 


 
 

 

Table of Contents

    Page 
 
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS  1 
CERTAIN TERMS AND CONVENTIONS  2 
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION  2 
ITEM 1.  Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers  2 
ITEM 2.  Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable  2 
ITEM 3.  Key Information  2 
  Selected Financial and Operating Data  2 
  Exchange Rates  6 
  RISK FACTORS  7 
  Risks Relating to Our Operations and the Brazilian Power Industry  7 
  Risks Relating to Brazil  13 
  Risks Relating to the ADSs and Our Common Shares  14 
ITEM 4.  Information on the Company  15 
  Overview  15 
  Our Strategy  19 
  Our Service Territory  21 
  Distribution  21 
  Purchases of Electricity  24 
  Consumers and Tariffs  25 
  Generation of Electricity  27 
  Electricity Commercialization and Services  35 
  Competition  37 
  Our Concessions and Authorizations  37 
  Properties  41 
  Environmental  41 
  The Brazilian Power Industry  42 
  Principal Regulatory Authorities  42 
  Concessions, Permissions and Authorizations  44 
  The New Industry Model Law  45 
  Tariffs for the Use of the Distribution and Transmission Systems  50 
  Distribution Tariffs  50 
  Government Incentives to the Energy Sector  52 
  Regulatory Charges  52 
  Energy Reallocation Mechanism  53 
ITEM 4A.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS  54 
ITEM 5.  OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS  54 
ITEM 6.  Directors, Senior Management and Employees  85 
ITEM 7.  Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions  92 
ITEM 8.  Financial Information  95 
ITEM 9.  The Offer and Listing  97 
ITEM 10.  Additional Information  100 
  Material Contracts  106 
ITEM 11.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk  116 
ITEM 12.  Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities  117 
  Reimbursement of Fees and Direct and Indirect Payments by the Depositary  120 
ITEM 13.  Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies  118 
ITEM 14.  Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use Of Proceeds  118 
ITEM 15.  Controls and Procedures  118 
  Internal Control over Financial Reporting  118 
ITEM 16.     119 
ITEM 16A.  AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT  119 
ITEM 16B.  CODE OF ETHICS  120 

 


 
 

 

ITEM 16C.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES  120 
  Audit and Non-Audit Fees  120 
  Audit Committee Approval Policies and Procedures  120 
ITEM 16D.  EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES  121 
ITEM 16E.  PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS  121 
ITEM 16F.  CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT  121 
ITEM 16G.  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  121 
ITEM 16H.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE  122 
ITEM 17.  Financial Statements  122 
ITEM 18.  Financial Statements  122 
ITEM 19.  Exhibits  122 
GLOSSARY OF TERMS  123 
SIGNATURES    126 

 

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report contains information that constitutes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Many of the forward-looking statements contained in this annual report can be identified by the use of forward-looking words, such as “believe,” “may,” “aim,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “will,” “intend,” “expect” and “potential,” among others.  Forward-looking statements include information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations, business strategies, financing plans, competitive position, industry environment, potential growth opportunities, the effects of future regulation and the effects of competition.  Those statements appear in a number of places in this annual report, principally under the captions “Item 3.  Key Information—Risk Factors,” “Item 4.  Information on the Company” and “Item 5.  Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”  We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current beliefs, expectations and projections about future events and financial trends affecting our business.  Many important factors, in addition to those discussed elsewhere in this annual report, could cause our actual results to differ substantially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements.  These factors include:

·         general economic, political, demographic and business conditions in Brazil and particularly in the markets we serve;

·         changes in applicable laws and regulations, as well as the enactment of new laws and regulations, including those relating to environmental, tax and employment matters;

·         electricity shortages;

·         changes in tariffs;

·         our inability to generate electricity due to water shortages, Transmission outages, operational or technical problems or physical damages to our facilities;

·         potential disruption or interruption of our services;

·         inflation and exchange rate variation;

·         the early termination of our concessions to operate our facilities;

·         increased competition in the power industry markets in which we operate;

·         our inability to implement our capital expenditure plan, including our inability to arrange financing when required and on reasonable terms;

·         changes in consumer demand;

·         existing and future governmental regulations relating to the power industry; and

·         the risk factors discussed under “Item 3.  Key Information—Risk Factors,” beginning on page 7.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they were made, and we undertake no obligation to update or to revise them after we distribute this annual report because of new information, future events or other factors.  In light of these limitations, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements contained in this annual report.

 

1

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

CERTAIN TERMS AND CONVENTIONS

A glossary of electricity industry terms is included in this annual report, beginning on page 123

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION

We maintain our books and records in reais.  We prepared our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). 

ITEM 1.                        Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

Not applicable.

ITEM 2.                        Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

Not applicable.

ITEM 3.                        Key Information

Selected Financial and Operating Data

The tables below contain a summary of our financial data as of and for years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009Our financial data as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012 was derived from our consolidated financial statements, which appear elsewhere in this annual report were prepared in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the IASB.  You should read this selected financial data in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in this annual report. Our financial data as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the year ended December 31, 2009 was derived from our audited financial statements that are not included in this annual report.

 

The following tables present our selected financial data as of and for each of the periods indicated.

2

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

2012

2012

2011(5)

2010(5)

2009(6)

 

US$

R$

R$

R$

R$

 

(in millions, except per share and per ADS data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating revenue

7,367

15,055

12,764

12,024

11,358

Cost of electric energy services:

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of electric energy

3,781

7,726

6,221

6,222

6,015

Operating cost

793

1,620

1,158

1,068

1,054

Services rendered to third parties

663

1,356

1,139

1,051

621

Gross operating income

2,130

4,353

4,246

3,683

3,668

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

Sales expenses

229

468

364

301

255

General and administrative expenses

358

733

615

443

403

Other operating expense

186

381

216

200

227

Income from electric energy service

1,356

2,771

3,051

2,739

2,783

Financial income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

Income

352

720

761

566

351

Expense

(728)

(1,488)

(1,387)

(837)

(672)

Net financial income (expenses)

(376)

(768)

(625)

(271)

(321)

Income before taxes

980

2,003

2,425

2,468

2,461

Social contribution

(97)

(199)

(216)

(229)

(207)

Income tax

(268)

(548)

(585)

(625)

(573)

Total taxes

(365)

(747)

(801)

(853)

(780)

Net income

615

1,257

1,624

1,615

1,681

Net income attributable to controlling shareholders

600

1,226

1,572

1,572

1,650

Net income attributable to non-controlling shareholders

15

31

52

22

31

Earnings per share attributable to controlling shareholders(1):

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

0.62

1.27

1.63

1.66

1.72

Diluted

0.62

1.26

1.63

1.66

1.72

Net income per ADS

1.28

2.61

3.26

3.32

3.44

Dividends(2)

536

1,096

1,506

1,260

1,227

Weighted average of number of common shares (in million)

962

962

962

962

960

Dividends per share(1)(2)

0.56

1.14

1.57

1.31

1.28

Dividends per ADS(2)

1.12

2.28

3.13

2.62

2.56

 

3

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

BALANCE SHEET DATA

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

2012

2012

2011 (5)

2010(5)

2009

 

US$

R$

R$

R$

R$

 

(in millions, except per share and per ADS data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

1,213

2,478

2,700

1,563

1,487

Consumers, concessionaires and licensees

1,110

2,269

1,874

1,816

1,753

Other current assets

432

884

789

519

409

Total current assets

2,755

5,630

5,363

3,898

3,649

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncurrent assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

79

162

182

196

225

Financial asset of concession

1,146

2,343

1,377

935

674

Property, plant and equipment

4,704

9,612

8,292

5,786

5,213

Intangible Assets

4,666

9,535

8,927

6,585

6,063

Other noncurrent assets

1,856

3,793

3,272

2,657

2,666

Total noncurrent assets

12,452

25,445

22,050

16,159

14,841

Total assets

15,207

31,076

27,413

20,057

18,490

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term debt(3)

1,044

2,133

1,653

2,251

1,364

Other current liabilities

1,498

3,060

2,846

2,177

2,059

Total current liabilities

2,541

5,193

4,499

4,428

3,423

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncurrent liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt(3)

7,337

14,993

11,955

7,167

6,548

Other long-term liabilities

1,215

2,482

2,406

1,712

1,983

Noncurrent liabilities

8,552

17,475

14,361

8,879

8,531

Noncontrolling interest

739

1,510

1,485

256

267

Net equity attributable to controlling shareholders

3,375

6,897

7,067

6,494

6,269

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

15,207

31,076

27,413

20,057

18,490

 

4

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

OPERATING DATA

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Energy sold (in GWh):

 

 

 

 

 

Residential

14,567

13,626

12,983

12,346

11,649

Industrial

14,536

14,718

15,413

14,970

16,066

Commercial

8,714

8,140

7,695

7,297

6,938

Rural

2,093

1,991

2,100

2,256

2,449

Public administration

1,220

1,154

1,112

1,074

1,027

Public lighting

1,525

1,495

1,444

1,408

1,355

Public services

1,864

1,823

1,742

1,664

1,634

Own consumption

33

33

33

33

32

Total energy sold to Final Consumers

44,552

42,979

42,522

41,048

41,150

Electricity sales to wholesalers (in GWh)

15,214

14,089

12,737

12,925

9,551

Total consumers (in thousands)(4)

7,176

6,952

6,748

6,567

6,425

Installed capacity (in MW)

2,961

2,644

2,309

1,737

1,704

Assured Energy (in GWh)(7)

12,742

11,678

7,786

7,485

7,134

Energy generated (in GWh)

10,570

9,638

9,142

5,984

6,659

 

                                                               


(1)          Net income per share and Dividends per share are based on the number of shares resulting from the reverse and forward stock split of our common shares as if they had occurred on January 1,  2009.

(2)          “Dividends” represent the total amount of dividends from net income for each period indicated, subject to approval of the shareholders at the general shareholders’ meeting to be held in the following year.

(3)          Short-term debt and Long‑term debt include loans and financing, debentures,  accrued interest on loans, financing and debentures and derivatives.

(4)          Represents active consumers (meaning consumers who are connected to the Distribution Network), rather than consumers invoiced at period-end.

(5)          Includes the effects described in note 2.8 to our consolidated financial statements.

(6)          Our net financial expenses, income taxes and net income reduced in R$12 million, R$4 million and R$8 million respectively, due to the reasons described in note 2.8 to our consolidated financial statements.

(7)          Refers to Assured Energy in GW available at the end-period, multiplied by the number of hours per each year. Further information about commencement of operation of each power plant, see Item 4 – Information on the company.

 

5

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Exchange Rates

The Central Bank allows the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate to float freely, and it has intervened occasionally to control unstable movements in foreign exchange rates.  We cannot predict whether the Central Bank or the Brazilian government will continue to let the real  float freely or will intervene in the exchange rate market through a currency band system or otherwise.  The real  may substantially depreciate or appreciate against the U.S. dollar.  For more information on these risks, see “Item 3.  Additional Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Brazil.”

The following table provides information on the selling exchange rate, expressed in reais  per U.S. dollar (R$/US$), for the periods indicated.

 

Year-end

Average for period(1)

Low

High

 

(reais  per U.S. dollar)

Year ended:

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2008

2.337

1.833

1.559

2.500

December 31, 2009

1.741

1.990

1.702

2.422

December 31, 2010

1.666

1.759

1.655

1.881

December 31, 2011

1.876

1.671

1.535

1.902

December 31, 2012

2.044

1.958

1.702

2.112

 

                                                               

(1)           Year-end figures represent the average of the month-end selling exchange rates during the relevant period.

 

Month-end

Average for period(1)

Low

High

 

(reais  per U.S. dollar)

Month ended:

 

 

 

 

September 2012

2.031

2.028

2.014

2.039

October 2012

2.031

2.030

2.022

2.038

November 2012

2.107

2.068

2.031

2.107

December 2012

1.876

2.078

2.044

2.112

January 2013

1.988

2.031

1.988

2.047

February 2013

1.975

1.973

1.957

1.989

March 2013

2.014

1.983

1.953

2.019

April (through April 12, 2013)

1.976

1.999

1.974

2.024

                                        


(1)           The figures provided for months in 2012 and 2013, as well as for the month of April up to and including April 12, 2013, represent the average of the selling exchange rates at the close of trading on each business day during such period.

 

6

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

RISK FACTORS

Risks Relating to Our Operations and the Brazilian Power Industry

We are subject to comprehensive regulation of our business, which fundamentally affects our financial performance.

Our business is subject to extensive regulation by various Brazilian regulatory authorities, particularly the National Electric Energy Agency, Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica (“ANEEL”).  ANEEL regulates and oversees various aspects of our business and establishes our tariffs.  If we are obliged by ANEEL to make additional and unexpected capital investments and are not allowed to adjust our tariffs accordingly, or if ANEEL modifies the regulations related to such adjustment, we may be adversely affected.

In addition, both the implementation of our strategy for growth and our ordinary business may be adversely affected by governmental actions such as changes to current legislation, the termination of federal and state concession programs, creation of more rigid criteria for qualification in public energy auctions, or a delay in the revision and implementation of new annual tariffs.

If regulatory changes require us to conduct our business in a manner substantially different from our current operations, our operations and financial results may be adversely affected.

The regulatory framework under which we operate is subject to legal challenge.

The Brazilian government implemented fundamental changes in the regulation of the power industry under 2004 legislation known as the Lei do Novo Modelo do Setor Elétrico, or New Industry Model Law.  Challenges to the constitutionality of the New Industry Model Law are still pending before the Brazilian Supreme Court.  If all or part of the New Industry Model Law were held to be unconstitutional, there would be uncertain consequences for the validity of existing regulation and the further development of the regulatory framework.  The outcome of the legal proceedings is difficult to predict, but it could have an adverse impact on the entire energy sector, including our business and results of operations.

We are uncertain as to the renewal of our concessions.

We carry out our generation and distribution activities pursuant to concession agreements entered into with the Brazilian Federal Government.  Our concessions range in duration from 16 to 35 years, with the first expiration date in 2015.  Five of our distribution subsidiaries, as well as three Small Hydroelectric Power Plants and six Micro Hydroelectric Power Plants that generate energy exclusively for these distribution subsidiaries, have concessions that expire in July 2015 (originally) and may be renewed for an additional 20 years upon our request but at the discretion of the Federal Government.  In 2012, these five distribution subsidiaries represented 5.6% of net operating revenues of our distribution companies and 5.6% of the energy distributed by these companies.

The Brazilian constitution requires that all concessions relating to public services be awarded through a bidding process.  Under laws and regulations specific to the electric sector, the Federal Government may renew existing concessions for additional periods of up to 30 years without a bidding process, provided that the concessionaire has met minimum performance standards and that the proposal is otherwise acceptable to the Federal Government.  The Federal Government has considerable discretion under the Concessions Law and the concession contracts with respect to renewal of concessions.

Law No. 12,783, of January 11, 2013, defined the conditions for the renewal of generation, transmission and distribution concessions that have been obtained under the conditions specified in articles 17, 19 or 22 of Law No. 9,074 of July, 7, 1995.  These concessions may be extended once at the discretion of the Federal Government, for a period of up to 30 years in order to ensure the continuity and efficiency of the services rendered and low tariffs.  Law No. 12,783/13 provided that renewals that would take place in 2015, 2016 or 2017 could be anticipated to 2012. On October 10, 2012, we applied for the renewal of the concession of our distribution subsidiaries CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Jaguari, CPFL Mococa, CPFL Leste Paulista and CPFL Sul Paulista.  These concessions were granted in 1999 for a 16-year period.  The response from the Federal Governement is still pending. We cannot assure that the renewal will be granted, if it will be antecipated or the conditions under which it will be granted.  If these concessions are not renewed or renewed subject to conditions that are unfavorable to us, our revenues could be adversely affected.

7

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

The tariffs that we charge for sales of electricity to captive consumers are determined by ANEEL pursuant to concession agreements with the Brazilian government, so our operating revenues could be adversely affected if ANEEL makes decisions relating to our tariffs that are not favorable to us.

ANEEL has substantial discretion to establish the tariff rates our distribution companies charge our consumers.  Our tariffs are determined pursuant to concession agreements with the Brazilian Federal Government, and in accordance with ANEEL’s regulations and decisions.

Our concession agreements and the Brazilian law establish a mechanism that permits three types of tariff adjustments:  (i) the annual adjustment (“reajuste tarifário anual”), (ii) the periodic revision (“revisão tarifária periódica”) and (iii) the extraordinary revision (“revisão tarifária extraordinária”).  We are entitled to apply each year for the annual adjustment, which is designed to offset some effects of inflation on tariffs and pass through to consumers certain changes in our cost structure that are beyond our control, such as the cost of electricity we purchase from certain sources and certain regulatory charges, including charges for the use of transmission and distribution facilities.  In addition, ANEEL carries out a periodic revision every four or five years that is aimed at identifying variations in our costs as well as setting a factor based on our operational efficiency that will be applied against the index of our ongoing annual tariff adjustments, the objective of which is to share any related gains with our consumers.  We are also subject to extraordinary revision of our tariffs that may affect (negatively or positively) our results of operations or financial position.

We cannot be sure if ANEEL will establish tariffs at rates that are favorable to us, due to changes in the methods in calculating the periodic revision adjustments.  In addition, to the extent that any of these adjustments are not granted by ANEEL in a timely manner, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

On November 22, 2011, ANEEL defined the methodology applicable to the third periodic revision cycle (2011 to 2014) through Resolution No. 457/2011.  For the third cycle, ANEEL has designated a new method of recognizing which costs we may pass through to our consumers.  In addition, ANEEL approved the new methodology for calculating the TUSD and other electricity tariffs, under which Distributors assume all market risk resulting from tariff indicators.  As compared to the previous tariff cycle, this new methodology negatively impacts our financial condition and results of operations.

We could be penalized by ANEEL for failing to comply with the terms of our concession agreements, which could result in fines, other penalties and, depending on the gravity of the non‑compliance, in our concessions being terminated.

ANEEL may impose penalties on us in the event that we fail to comply with any provision of our concession agreements.  Depending on the gravity of the non‑compliance, these penalties could include the following:

·         warning notices;

·         fines per breach of up to 2.0% of the revenues from the relevant concession in the year ended immediately prior to the date of the relevant breach;

·         injunctions related to the construction of new facilities and equipment;

·         restrictions on the operation of existing facilities and equipment;

·         intervention by ANEEL in the management of the concessionaire; and

·         termination of the concession.

8

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

In addition, the Brazilian government has the power to terminate any of our concessions by means of expropriation for reasons related to the public interest.

We are currently in compliance with all of the material terms of our concession agreements.  However, we cannot assure that we will not be penalized by ANEEL for breaching our concession agreements or that our concessions will not be terminated in the future.  The compensation to which we are entitled upon expiration or early termination of our concessions may not be sufficient for us to realize the full value of certain assets.  In addition, if any of our concession agreements is terminated for reasons attributable to us, the effective amount of compensation by the granting authorities could be materially reduced through the imposition of fines or other penalties.  Accordingly, the imposition of fines or penalties on us or the termination of any of our concessions could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be able to fully pass through the costs of our electricity purchases and, to meet demand, we could be forced to enter into short‑term agreements to purchase electricity at prices substantially higher than under our long‑term purchase agreements.

Under the New Industry Model Law, an electricity Distributor must contract in advance, through public bids, for 100% of its forecasted electricity needs for its distribution concession areas.  Over- or under-forecasting demand can have adverse consequences.  If our forecasted demand is incorrect and we purchase less or more electricity than we need, we may be prevented from fully passing through the costs of our electricity purchases and we may also be forced to enter into short‑term agreements to purchase electricity at prices substantially higher than under our long‑term purchase agreements.  For instance, the New Industry Model Law provides, among other restrictions, that if our forecasts fall significantly short of actual electricity demand, we may be forced to make up the shortfall with shorter term electricity purchase agreements.  If our acquisitions of electricity in the public auctions are above the Annual Reference Value (Valor Anual de Referência), as defined in “Item 4.  Information on the Company—The New Industry Model Law—The Annual Reference Value,” established by the Brazilian government, we may not be able to fully pass through the costs of our electricity purchases.  Our forecasted electricity demand may prove inaccurate, including as a result of consumers moving between the different markets (regulated and free).  If there are significant variations between our electricity needs and the volume of our electricity purchases, our results of operations may be adversely affected.  See “Item 4.  Information on the Company—The Brazilian Power Industry—The New Industry Model Law.”

We generate a significant portion of our operating revenues from consumers that qualify as Free Consumers, which are allowed to seek alternative electricity suppliers.  We may face other types of competition that could adversely affect our market share and revenues.

Within our concession areas, other electricity suppliers are permitted to compete with us in offering electricity to certain consumers that qualify as Free Consumers, to whom our distribution subsidiaries may supply electricity only at regulated tariffs.  These consumers qualified as Free Consumers may elect to opt out of our regulated distribution system upon the expiration of their contracts with us, by providing six months’ prior notice, or by providing a year’s prior notice if their contract has no fixed termination date.  At December 31, 2012, we supplied energy to 47 consumers qualified as Free Consumers, which accounted for approximately 1.7% of our net operating revenues and approximately 2.4% of the total volume of electricity sold by our Distributors during 2012.  In addition, other consumers meeting certain criteria may become Free Consumers if they move to energy from renewable energy sources, such as Small Hydroelectric Power Plants or biomass. At December 31, 2012 we had a total of 1,723 potentially Free Consumers which accounted for approximately 12.2% of our net operating revenues and approximately 14.6% of the total volume of electricity sold by our distribution companies during 2012.

Additionally, it is possible that our large industrial clients could be authorized by ANEEL to generate electric energy for own consumption or sale to other parties, in which case they may obtain an authorization or concession for the generation of electric power in a given area, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

 

9

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Our operating results depend on prevailing hydrological conditions.  Poor hydrological conditions may require a higher dispatch of thermoelectric generation in Brazilian electric system, which may affect our results of operations.

We are dependent on the prevailing hydrological conditions in the geographic region in which we operate.  In 2012, according to data from the ONS, approximately 86% of Brazil’s electricity supply came from Hydroelectric Facilities.  Our region is subject to unpredictable hydrological conditions, with non‑cyclical deviations from average rainfall.  In order to compensate for poor hydrological conditions and to maintain the reservoirs security levels and electricity supply level, the ONS may dispatch Thermoeletric Power Plants, including ours. The replacement of hydroelectricity generation with thermoelectric generation may lead to adverse results in our generation segment as hydro power plants, including ours, may receive in the Energy Reallocation Mechanism, Mecanismo de Realocação de Energia (“MRE”) an amount of energy lower than their assured energy. This deficit of energy will represent an expense valued at the electricity spot price, exposing the hydrogenerator to spot price risk.

For the distribution segment, the additional costs of thermoelectric generation will be passed through tariffs in the following annual adjustments or periodical review, as permitted by the regulation. However, there may be a mismatch of costs and revenues for the distribution company, affecting its cash flow at the short term, since distribution companies have to pay the additional thermoelectric cost instantly and this cost will only integrate rates after the following annual adjustments or periodical review.

The impact of an electricity shortage and related electricity rationing, as in 2001 and 2002, may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

During the low rainfall period of 2000 and 2001, the Brazilian government instituted the Rationing Program, a program to reduce electricity consumption that was in effect from June 1, 2001 to February 28, 2002.  The Rationing Program established limits for energy consumption for industrial, commercial and residential consumers, which ranged from a 15.0% to a 25.0% reduction in energy consumption.  If Brazil experiences another electricity shortage (a condition which might happen and we are not able to control or anticipate), the Brazilian government may implement similar or other policies in the future to address the shortage that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.  A recurrence of poor hydrological conditions that result in a low supply of electricity to the Brazilian market could cause, among other things, the implementation of broad electricity conservation programs, including mandated reductions in electricity consumption.  We cannot assure you that periods of severe or sustained below-average rainfall will not adversely affect our financial results.

Construction, expansion and operation of our electricity generation and distribution facilities and equipment involve significant risks that could lead to lost revenues or increased expenses.

The construction, expansion and operation of facilities and equipment for the generation and distribution of electricity involves many risks, including:

·         the inability to obtain required governmental permits and approvals;

·         the unavailability of equipment;

·         supply interruptions;

·         work stoppages;

·         labor unrest;

·         social unrest;

·         weather and hydrological interferences;

·         unforeseen engineering and environmental problems;

10

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

·         increases in electricity losses, including technical and commercial losses;

·         construction and operational delays, or unanticipated cost overruns;

·         the inability to win electricity auctions promoted by ANEEL; and

·         unavailability of adequate funding.

If we experience these or other problems, we may not be able to generate or distribute electricity in amounts consistent with our projections, which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to environmental and health regulations that may become more stringent in the future and may result in increased liabilities and increased capital expenditures.

Our distribution and generation activities are subject to comprehensive federal and state legislation as well as supervision by Brazilian governmental agencies that are responsible for the implementation of environmental and health laws and policies.  These agencies could take enforcement action against us for our failure to comply with their regulations.  These actions could include, among other things, the imposition of fines and revocation of licenses.  It is possible that enhanced environmental and health regulations will force us to allocate capital expenditures to compliance, and consequently, divert funds from planned investments.  Such a diversion could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

If we are unable to complete our proposed capital expenditure program in a timely manner, the operation and development of our business may be adversely affected.

We plan to invest approximately R$2,062 million in our generation activities from conventional and renewable sources, and R$5,981 million in our distribution activities during the period from 2013 through 2017.  Our ability to carry out this capital expenditure program depends on a variety of factors, including our ability to charge adequate tariffs for our services, our access to domestic and international capital markets and a variety of operating, regulatory and other contingencies.  We cannot be certain that we will have the financial resources to complete our proposed capital expenditure program, and failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on the operation and development of our business.

We are strictly liable for any damages resulting from inadequate provision of electricity services, and our contracted insurance policies may not fully cover such damages.

Under Brazilian law, we are strictly liable for direct and indirect damages resulting from the inadequate provision of electricity distribution services.  In addition, our distribution facilities may, together with our generation utilities, be held liable for damages caused to others as a result of interruptions or disturbances arising from the generation, transmission or distribution systems, whenever these interruptions or disturbances are not attributed to an identifiable member of the ONS.  We cannot assure you that our contracted insurance policies will fully cover damages resulting from inadequate rendering of electricity services, which may have an adverse effect on us.

We may not be able to create the expected benefits and return on investments from the energy generation businesses we recently entered into.

We have entered into a number of energy generation businesses (wind, thermoelectric and biomass energy) with substantial capital investments.  We have few operating history and track record in these industries and may not be able to foster the synergies with our traditional businesses.  In addition:

·         In the biomass business, we may suffer from a lack of sugar cane (a necessary input for the generation of this type of energy) in the market.  In addition, we depend to a certain extent on the performance of our partners in these projects in the construction and operation of the plants;

·         Among the significant uncertainties and risks with respect to our wind farms under construction, we have financial risk associated with the difference between the energy we generate and the energy contracted through the reserve energy contract (Contrato de Energia de Reserva – CER), in which we bear the risk of divergences arising from:  (a) wind intensity and duration different from that contemplated in the study phase of the project; (b) delay in commencement of operations of the wind farms under construction; and (c) unavailability of wind turbines at levels above the performance benchmarks;

11

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

If these generation plants are not able to (i) generate the energy contracted by our clients, or (ii) generate the energy necessary to supply any clients in the Free Market, and (iii), the energy provided to us is insufficient to supply the contracted demand, we may be obliged to buy the shortfall in the spot market, in which the price per MWh is usually more volatile and may be higher than our price, resulting in an adverse effect on us.  See “Item 4.  Information on the Company—The Brazilian Power Industry—The New Industry Model Law.”

Our growth, operating results and financial condition may be negatively affected by one or more of the above factors.

We are controlled by a few shareholders acting together, and their interests could conflict with yours.

As of December 31, 2012, VBC Energia S.A./ESC Energia S.A./Camargo Corrêa S.A., PREVI/BB Carteira Livre I FIA and Energia São Paulo FIA/Bonaire Participações S.A. owned 25.64%, 31.02% and 12.62%, respectively, of our outstanding common shares.  These entities are parties to a shareholders’ agreement, pursuant to which they share the power to control us.  Our controlling shareholders may take actions that could be contrary to your interests, and our controlling shareholders will be able to prevent other shareholders, including you, from blocking these actions.  In particular, our controlling shareholders control the outcome of decisions at shareholders’ meetings, and they can elect a majority of the members of our Board of Directors.  Our controlling shareholders can direct our actions in areas such as business strategy, financing, distributions, acquisitions and dispositions of assets or businesses.  Their decisions on these matters may be contrary to the expectations or preferences of our noncontrolling shareholders, including holders of our ADSs.  See “Item 7.  Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Shareholders’ Agreement.”

We are exposed to increases in prevailing market interest rates, as well as foreign exchange rate risk.

As of December 31, 2012, approximately 85.8% of our total indebtedness was denominated in reais  and indexed to Brazilian money-market rates or inflation rates, or bore interest at floating rates.  The remaining 14.2% of our total indebtedness was denominated in U.S. dollars and substantially subject to currency swaps that converted these obligations into reais.  In addition, the costs of electricity purchased from the Itaipu power plant (“Itaipu”) are indexed to the U.S. dollar exchange variation.  Our tariffs are adjusted annually in order to contemplate the losses or gains’ effects from such electricity acquisition.  Accordingly, if these indexation rates rise or the U.S. dollar/real  exchange rates appreciate, our financing expenses will increase.

Our indebtedness and debt service obligations could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and make payments on our debt.

As of December 31, 2012, we had a debt of R$17,126 million.  Our indebtedness increases the possibility that we may be unable to generate cash sufficient to pay when due the principal, interest or other amounts due in respect of our indebtedness.  In addition, we may incur additional debt from time to time to finance strategic acquisitions, investments, joint ventures or for other purposes, subject to the restrictions applicable under our existing indebtedness.  If we incur additional debt, the risks associated with our leverage would increase.

We may acquire other companies in the electricity business, as we have in the past, and these acquisitions could increase our leverage or adversely affect our consolidated performance.

We regularly analyze opportunities to acquire other companies engaged in activities along the entire electricity generation, transmission and distribution chain.  If we do acquire other electricity companies, it could increase our leverage or reduce our profitability.  Furthermore, we may not be able to integrate the acquired company’s activities and achieve the economies of scale and expected efficiency gains that often drive such acquisitions, and failure to do so could harm our financial condition and results of operations.

 

12

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Risks Relating to Brazil

The Brazilian government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy.  This involvement, as well as Brazilian political and economic conditions, could adversely affect our business and the trading price of our ADSs and our common shares.

The Brazilian government frequently intervenes in the Brazilian economy and occasionally makes significant changes in policy and regulations.  The Brazilian government’s actions to control inflation and other policies and regulations have often involved, among other measures, increases in interest rates, changes in tax policies, price controls, currency devaluations, capital controls and limits on imports.  Our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by changes in policy or regulations at the federal, state or municipal levels involving or affecting factors such as:

·         interest rates;

·         monetary policy;

·         currency fluctuations;

·         inflation; 

·         liquidity of domestic capital and lending markets;

·         tax policies;

·         changes in labor laws;

·         regulatory environment of our sector;

·         exchange rates and exchange controls and restrictions on remittances abroad, such as those that were briefly imposed in 1989 and early 1990; and

·         other political, social and economic developments in or affecting Brazil.

We cannot assure you that the Brazilian government will continue with the current economic policies, or that any changes implemented by the Brazilian government will not, directly or indirectly, affect our business and results of operations.

Exchange rate instability may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and the market price of the ADSs and our common shares.

The Brazilian currency has during the last decades experienced frequent and substantial variations in relation to the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies.  In the context of the crisis in the global financial markets after mid-2008, the real  depreciated against the U.S. dollar, reaching R$2.337 per US$1.00 at year-end 2008.  During 2009, the real  appreciated 25.5% against the U.S. dollar in the context of the economic recovery, reaching R$1.741 per US$1.00 at year-end 2009.  On December 31, 2011 and 2012, the exchange rate of the real  against the U.S. dollar was R$1.876 and R$2.044 per US$1.00, respectively.  On April 12, 2013, the exchange rate was R$1.976 per US$1.00.  We cannot assure that the real  will not depreciate against the U.S. dollar in the future.

Depreciation of the real  increases the cost of servicing our foreign currency denominated debt and the cost of purchasing electricity from the Itaipu power plant, a Hydroelectric Facility that is one of our major suppliers and that adjusts electricity prices based in part on its U.S. dollar costs.  Depreciation of the real  against the U.S. dollar could create inflationary pressures in Brazil and cause increases in interest rates, which could negatively affect the growth of the Brazilian economy as a whole and harm our financial condition and results of operations, curtail access to foreign financial markets and may prompt government intervention, including recessionary governmental policies.  Depreciation of the real  against the U.S. dollar can also lead to decreased consumer spending, deflationary pressures and reduced growth in the economy as a whole.  On the other hand, appreciation of the real  relative to the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies could lead to a deterioration of the Brazilian foreign exchange current account, as well as dampen export-driven growth.  Depending on the circumstances, either depreciation or appreciation of the real  could materially and adversely affect the growth of the Brazilian economy and our business, financial condition and results of operations.

13

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Depreciation of the real  also reduces the U.S. dollar value of distributions and dividends on the ADSs and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the market price of our common shares and, as a result, the ADSs.

Government efforts to combat inflation may hinder the growth of the Brazilian economy and could harm our business.

Brazil has in the past experienced extremely high rates of inflation and has therefore followed monetary policies that have resulted in one of the highest real  interest rates in the world.  Between 2006 and 2012, the base interest rate in Brazil (“SELIC”) varied between 17.25% p.a. and 7.25% p.a.  Inflation and the Brazilian government’s measures to fight it, principally through the Central Bank, have had and may in future have significant effects on the Brazilian economy and our business.  Tight monetary policies with high interest rates may restrict Brazil’s growth and the availability of credit.  Conversely, more lenient government and Central Bank policies and interest rate decreases may trigger increases in inflation, and, consequently, volatility in growth and the need for sudden and significant interest rate increases, which could negatively affect our business.  In addition, if Brazil again experiences high inflation, we may not be able to adjust the rates we charge our consumers to offset the effects of inflation on our cost structure.

Developments and the perception of risk in other countries, including the United States and emerging market countries, may adversely affect the market price of Brazilian securities, including our ADSs and our common shares.

The market value of securities of Brazilian issuers is affected by economic and market conditions in other countries, including the United States, the European Union and emerging market countries.  The 2008 global financial crisis has generated significant consequences, such as stock and credit market volatility, unavailability of credit, higher interest rates, a general economic slowdown, volatile exchange rates and inflationary pressure.  Even though the world economy and the financial and capital markets had been recovering, the conditions of the global markets again deteriorated in by the end of 2011.  European countries encountered serious fiscal problems, including high debt levels that impair growth and increase the risk of sovereign default.  In 2012, there were threats of some countries leaving the block, but this risk was contained by the EU and European Central Bank. At the same time, the United States faced significant political conflicts due to the lack of a decision regarding the continuation of incentives of social programs; the suspension of these incentives would result in a strong economic slowdown. In this context of uncertainty, the Chinese economy also faced a slowdown in 2012, demanding the Chinese government to intervene on public investment levels, aiming to avoid an abrupt hard landing..  Although economic conditions in those countries may differ significantly from economic conditions in Brazil, investor reactions to developments in other countries may have an adverse effect on the market value of securities of Brazilian issuers.  Crises in the United States, the European Union or emerging market countries may diminish investor interest in securities of Brazilian issuers, including ours.  This could adversely affect the trading price of the ADSs or our common shares, and could also make it more difficult for us to access the capital markets and finance our operations in the future on acceptable terms or at all.

Risks Relating to the ADSs and Our Common Shares

Holders of our ADSs may encounter difficulties in the exercise of voting rights.

Holders of our common shares are entitled to vote on shareholder matters.  You may encounter difficulties in the exercise of some of your rights as a shareholder if you hold our ADSs rather than the underlying common shares.  For example, you are not entitled to attend a shareholders’ meeting, and you can only vote by giving timely instructions to the depositary in advance of the meeting.

 

14

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

If you surrender your ADSs and withdraw common shares, you risk losing the ability to remit foreign currency abroad and certain Brazilian tax advantages.

As an ADS holder, you benefit from the electronic certificate of foreign capital registration obtained by the custodian for our common shares underlying the ADSs in Brazil, which permits the custodian to convert dividends and other distributions with respect to the common shares into non‑Brazilian currency and remit the proceeds abroad.  If you surrender your ADSs and withdraw common shares, you will be entitled to continue to rely on the custodian’s electronic certificate of foreign capital registration for only five business days from the date of withdrawal.  Thereafter, upon the disposition of or distributions relating to the common shares, you will not be able to remit abroad non‑Brazilian currency unless you obtain your own electronic certificate of foreign capital registration or you qualify under Brazilian foreign investment regulations that entitle some foreign investors to buy and sell shares on Brazilian stock exchanges without obtaining separate electronic certificates of foreign capital registration.  If you do not qualify under the foreign investment regulations you will generally be subject to less favorable tax treatment of dividends and distributions on, and the proceeds from any sale of, our common shares.

If you attempt to obtain your own electronic certificate of foreign capital registration, you may incur expenses or suffer delays in the application process, which could delay your ability to receive dividends or distributions relating to our common shares or the return of your capital in a timely manner.  The depositary’s electronic certificate of foreign capital registration may also be adversely affected by future legislative changes.

Holders of ADSs may be unable to exercise preemptive rights with respect to our common shares.

We may not be able to offer our common shares to U.S. holders of ADSs pursuant to preemptive rights granted to holders of our common shares in connection with any future issuance of our common shares unless a registration statement under the Securities Act is effective with respect to such common shares and preemptive rights, or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available.  We are not obligated to file a registration statement relating to preemptive rights with respect to our common shares, and we cannot assure you that we will file any such registration statement.  If such a registration statement is not filed and an exemption from registration does not exist, Deutsche Bank, as depositary, will attempt to sell the preemptive rights, and you will be entitled to receive the proceeds of such sale.  However, these preemptive rights will expire if the depositary does not sell them, and U.S. holders of ADSs will not realize any value from the granting of such preemptive rights.

The relative volatility and illiquidity of the Brazilian securities markets may substantially limit your ability to sell the common shares underlying the ADSs at the price and time you desire.

Investing in securities that trade in emerging markets, such as Brazil, often involves greater risk than investing in securities of issuers in the United States, and such investments are generally considered to be more speculative in nature.  The Brazilian securities market is substantially smaller, less liquid, more concentrated and can be more volatile than major securities markets in the United States.  Accordingly, although you are entitled to withdraw the common shares underlying the ADSs from the depositary at any time, your ability to sell the common shares underlying the ADSs at a price and time at which you wish to do so may be substantially limited.  There is also significantly greater concentration in the Brazilian securities market than in major securities markets in the United States.  The ten largest companies in terms of market capitalization represented 51.8% of the aggregate market capitalization of the BM&FBOVESPA S.A. - Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias & Futuros (“BM&FBOVESPA”), as of December 31, 2012.  The top ten stocks in terms of trading volume accounted for 43.0%, 47.2% and  50.0% of all shares traded on the BM&FBOVESPA in 2012,   2011 and 2010, respectively.

ITEM 4.                        Information on the Company

Overview

We are a corporation (sociedade por ações) incorporated and existing under the laws of Brazil with the legal name CPFL Energia S.A.  Our principal executive offices are located at Rua Gomes de Carvalho, 1,510, 14th floor – Suite 142, Vila Olímpia, CEP 04547-005, in the City of São Paulo, state of São Paulo, Brazil and our telephone number is +55 11 3841-8507.

15

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

We are a holding company that, through our subsidiaries, distributes, generates and commercializes electricity in Brazil.  We were incorporated in 1998 as a joint venture among VBC, 521 Participações S.A. and Bonaire to combine their interests in companies operating in the Brazilian power sector.

We are one of the largest electricity Distributors in Brazil, based on the 40,645 GWh of electricity we distributed to approximately 7.2 million consumers in 2012.  In 2012, our Installed Capacity was 2,961MW.1 We are also involved in building two biomass generation projects and 18 wind farms, through which we expect to increase our Installed Capacity to 3,327 MW¹  once they are completed over the next three years.

We also engage in electricity commercialization, and provide agency services to Free Consumers before the CCEE and other agents, as well as electricity-related services to our affiliates and unaffiliated parties.  In 2012, the total amount of electricity sold by our commercialization subsidiaries was 4,850 GWh and 10,179 GWh to affiliated and unaffiliated parties, respectively.

In 2011 and 2012, the important events in the development of our business were as follows:

·         On April 19, 2011, we entered into an agreement with Energias Renováveis S.A. (“ERSA”) to combine assets and projects relating to renewable energy sources (wind, biomass and Small Hydroelectric Power Plants).  The transaction encompassed:  (i) the transfer of wind, biomass and Small Hydroelectric Power Plants previously owned and operated by CPFL Geração and CPFL Comercialização Brasil S.A. (“CPFL Brasil”) to certain companies, which subsequently transferred the wind, biomass and Small Hydroelectric Power Plants to a holding company, SMITA Empreendimentos e Participações S.A. (“SMITA”); (ii) the establishment of SMITA by CPFL Geração and CPFL Brasil; (iii) the incorporation of SMITA by ERSA, of which we turned out holding 54.5% interest; and (iv) the change of ERSA’s corporate name to CPFL Energia Renováveis S.A. (“CPFL Energias Renováveis”).  CPFL Energias Renováveis’ financial statements have been consolidated in our consolidated financial statements since August 1, 2011.  The transaction was ratified by our shareholders on December 19, 2011.

·         On April 7, 2011, CPFL Energia S.A. entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement for the acquisition of 100% of the shares of Jantus for R$823 million.  On September 21, 2011, CPFL Energia S.A. assigned the Sale and Purchase Agreement to CPFL Energias Renováveis.  In order to complete the acquisition, our subsidiary CPFL Brasil contributed funds to CPFL Energias Renováveis, of which we now hold 63% interest.  The transaction contemplated the acquisition of:  (i) four wind farms in operation in the state of Ceará with Installed Capacity of 210 MW, and (ii) a portfolio of wind farm projects with total Installed Capacity of 732 MW in the states of Ceará and Piauí, of which 412 MW has already been certified and eligible for participation in the next electricity auctions.  The acquisition was completed on December 19, 2011.

·         On December 29, 2011, through our subsidiary CPFL Energias Renováveis, we acquired all of the shares of Santa Luzia Energética S.A. (“Santa Luzia”), representing 100% of its capital stock for R$132 million through assumption of debts with BNDES.  As a result, we now have Santa Luzia Small Hydroelectric Power Plant, located in the cities of São Domingos and Iguaçu, in the state of Santa Catarina, with Installed Capacity of 28.5 MW.

·         In January, 2012, through our subsidiary CPFL Energias Renováveis, we entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement for the acquisition of 100% of the shares of Atlântica I Parque Eólico S.A. (“Atlântica I”), Atlântica II Parque Eólico S.A. (“Atlântica II”), Atlântica IV Parque Eólico S.A. (“Atlântica IV”) and Atlântica V Parque Eólico S.A. (“Atlântica V”).  Atlântica I, Atlântica II, Atlântica IV and Atlântica V hold authorizations to produce energy from wind sources as Independent Power Producers for a term of 35 years.  These wind farms are located in the state of Rio Grande do Sul and have aggregate Installed Capacity of 120 MW, all of which have been certified and sold at the auction of alternative sources of energy held on August 2010.  The acquisition was completed on March 23, 2012.


1 Considering CPFL Energia’s stake in each project

16

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

·         In March, 2012, through our subsidiary CPFL Energias Renováveis, we acquired 100% of the biomass electric energy and steam generation assets of SPE Lacenas Participações Ltda., a subsidiary of Usina Açucareira Ester (“Usina Ester”). Around 7 MW average of co-generation energy from Usina Ester were commercialized in the 2007 alternative sources auction (LFA), for a period of 15 years and at an average selling price of R$177 per MWh (as at January 2012). The remaining 2.8 MW of energy was sold on the free market for 18 years. The transfer of control of SPE Lacenas to the subsidiary was conditional upon approval from ANEEL, which was obtained and the acquisition was concluded on October 18, 2012. The total acquisition price of the assets after the adjustments provided for in the contract R$111.5 million, comprising: (i) R$55.2 million paid by the buyer to the sellers; and (ii) assumption of a net debt of R$56.3 million shown in the balance sheet of the acquired company.

·         On June 19, 2012, through our subsidiary CPFL Renováveis, we acquired the total capital stock of BVP S.A., a subsidiary of Bons Ventos Geradora de Energia S.A. (“Bons Ventos”). The total price of the acquisition was R$1,095 million, involving: (i) the payment to the sellers of the amount of R$529 million; (ii) the assumption of net debt in the amount of R$439 million; and (iii) R$128 million for settlement of debentures issued by Bons Ventos Geradora de Energia S.A. Bons Ventos has an authorization granted by ANEEL to exploit the Taíba Albatroz, Bons Ventos, Enacel and Canoa Quebrada wind power plants, with installed capacity of 157,5 MW. These wind power plants are located in the State of Ceará and are in full commercial operation. All the energy has been contracted to Eletrobrás for twenty years, under the PROINFA Program (Programa de Incentivo às Fontes Alternativas de Energia Elétrica). As per the Material Fact published on June 19, 2012, ANEEL has approved transfer of the control of BVP to the CPFL Renováveis.

·         On November 27, 2012, the Tanquinho solar power plant (“Tanquinho”) started operations.  Tanquinho is the first solar power plant in the state of São Paulo and the largest in Brazil.  Tanquinho is located in the city of Campinas, with an Installed Capacity of 1.1 MWp.  It is located in an area of 13,700 square meters at Tanquinho Substation, which belongs to one of our distribution subsidiaries.  The Tanquinho plant is expected to generate approximately 1.6 GWh per year.  Our subsidiary CPFL Energias Renováveis was responsible building this project and will be responsible for managing and operating the plant.

·         On December 19, 2012, we, Equatorial Energia S.A. (“Equatorial”) and Jorge Queiroz de Moraes Junior (“Controlling Shareholder”) signed a binding “Investment, Purchase and Sale Agreement and Other Covenants” commitment, with the following objective: (i) disposal to Equatorial by the  Controlling Shareholder of his direct and indirect interest in the control of Rede Energia S.A. (“Rede”) and other companies controlled by Rede (“Acquisition”); and (ii) investment by Equatorial and CPFL Energia of the outlay required for the operational and financial recovery of the companies in the Rede Group, including the electric energy distribution concessionaires controlled by Rede, which are under intervention by ANEEL (“Investment”). The Acquisition and the Investment are interlinked transactions, and the main preceding conditions are as follows: (i) prior consent by ANEEL, resulting in lifting of the interventions in relation to the concessionaires controlled by Rede; (ii) approval by the Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica – CADE; (iii) approval by creditors of Rede and other companies in the Rede group in the process of court reorganization under the court reorganization plan (iv) obtaining the necessary approval on the part of certain creditors and minority shareholders of the companies involved, in accordance with the pertinent law, contracts and shareholders agreements; and (v) obtaining the pertinent corporate approvals.

The following chart provides an overview of our corporate structure, as of March 31, 2013:

17

 


 
 

Table of Contents

(1) Controlling shareholders.

(2) Includes the 0.1% stake of Camargo Corrêa S.A.;

(3) Termoparaíba and Termonordeste Thermoelectric Facilities;

(4) CPFL Energia owns a 63.0% indirect interest in CPFL Renováveis through CPFL Geração.

 

Our core businesses are:

·         Distribution.  In 2012, our eight fully-consolidated distribution subsidiaries delivered 40,645 GWh of electricity to approximately 7.2 million consumers primarily in the states of São Paulo and Rio Grande do Sul.

·         Conventional generation sources.  As of December 31, 2012, we had Installed Capacity of 2,234 MW.  During 2012, we generated a total of 7,697 GWh of electricity, and we had 9,949 GWh of Assured Energy, the amount of energy representing our long‑term average electricity production, as established by ANEEL, which is the primary driver of our revenues relating to generation activities.  We hold equity interests in eight Hydroelectric Power Plants (Serra da Mesa, Monte Claro, Barra Grande, Campos Novos, Luiz Eduardo Magalhães-Lajeado, Castro Alves, 14 de Julho and Foz do Chapecó).  Although the concession for Serra da Mesa Hydroelectric Facility is held by Furnas, we are entitled to 51.54% of its Assured Energy.  In October 2010, Foz do Chapecó Hydroelectric Power Plant started operations, currently representing an Installed Capacity of 855 MW, of which we hold a share of 51%, or 436.1 MW.  We also own three Thermoelectric Power Plants, two of which were acquired in 2009 (Termonordeste and Termoparaíba) through the acquisition of EPASA.  In December 2010 and January 2011, respectively, Termonordeste and Termoparaíba power plants started operations with Installed Capacity of 170.8 MW each one.  We hold an aggregate 52.75%2 interest in Termonordeste and Termoparaíba, or 180.2 MW.

·         Renewable generation sources.  In 2011, we established CPFL Energias Renováveis, in which we own a 63% interest, to concentrate our activities in energy generation through renewable sources.  Currently, all of our wind farms and thermoelectric biomass plants, as well as 35 of our 47 Small Hydroelectric Power Plants, are managed by CPFL Energias Renováveis.  These 35 Small Hydroelectric Power Plants are responsible for 92.5% of the aggregate capacity generated by our Small Hydroelectric Power Plants as a whole, of which: (i) 35 are operational, with aggregate Installed Capacity of 326 MW, located in the states of São Paulo, Santa Catarina, Rio Grande do Sul, Minas Gerais and Mato Grosso.  Additionally, we have 33 wind farms, of which (i) 15 3 are operational, with aggregate Installed Capacity of 555.5 MW, located in the states of Ceará and Rio Grande do Norte, and (ii) 18 are under construction, with an estimated Installed Capacity of 482 MW, scheduled to commence operations between 2013 and 2016.  We also have eight thermoelectric biomass plants, of which:  (i) six are operational, with aggregate Installed Capacity of 270 MW, located in the states of São Paulo and Rio Grande do Norte, and (ii) two are under construction and with an estimated capacity of 100 MW, scheduled to start operations in 2013.  We closed 2012 with total Installed Capacity (i.e., including through our conventional generation sources segment) of 2,961 MW.  We will use part of our increased Installed Capacity for our own distribution and commercialization activities.


2 We acquired 51% of the shares of EPASA in September 2009.  However, as a result of a dilution of EPASA’s capital stock in December 2011, we now hold a 52.75% interest in it.

3 This number includes seven wind farms in Santa Clara complex with an istalled capacity of 188 MW.  We have been receiving revenues deriving from the Santa Clara wind farms, as contracted through the “2009 Auction Reserve Energy” (Leilão de Energia de Reserva), since July 2012. Although the construction of the Transmission line is not yet completed, these wind farms are ready to start generating energy.

18

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

·         Commercialization.  Our commercialization subsidiaries handle our commercialization operations and provide agency services to Free Consumers before the CCEE and other agents, including guidance on their operational requirements.  CPFL Brasil, our largest commercialization subsidiary, procures and sells electricity to Free Consumers, other commercialization and generation companies and distribution facilities.  In 2012, we sold 15,029 GWh of electricity, of which 10,179 GWh was sold to unaffiliated third parties.

·         Services  Since January 1, 2012, we started to analyze the services segment separately and we now disclose information with respect to our services activities as an operating segment.  Our subsidiary CPFL Serviços provides electricity-related services, such as project design and construction, to our affiliates and unaffiliated parties.

Our Strategy

Our overall objective is to consolidate our leadership position in the Brazilian electricity sector while creating value for our shareholders.  We seek to achieve these goals in all of our sectors (distribution, conventional generation sources, renewable generation sources, and commercialization and services) by pursuing operational efficiency (through innovation and technology) and growth (through business synergies and new projects).  Our strategies are grounded on financial discipline, social responsibility and enhanced corporate governance.  More specifically, our approach involves the following key business strategies.

Complete the development of our existing renewable generation projects, expand our generation portfolio by developing new conventional and renewable energy generation projects and maintain our position as market leader in renewable energy sources.  In 2011, we became the largest renewable energy company in Brazil by establishing CPFL Energias Renováveis and acquiring 100% of the shares of Jantus, a company engaged in the generation of energy through renewable sources, especially wind power.  In 2012, our Installed Capacity increased to 2,961 MW, 2,234 MW of which was conventionally generated, and 727 MW of which was generated through renewable sources.  This represented a 12.0% increase as compared to 2011, when our Installed Capacity was 2,644 MW.  This increase was due to (i) the acquisition of Bons Ventos wind farm complex, which we completed on June 19, 2012; (ii) the commencement of operations of Bio Ipê and Bio Pedra Thermoelectric Power Plants on May 17, 2012 and May 31, 2012, respectively; (iii) the acquisition of Ester Thermoelectric Power Plant, which we completed in October 18, 2012; (iv) the commencement of operations of Tanquinho solar power plant on November 27, 2012; and (v) the commencement of operations of Salto Góes Small Hydroelectric Power Plant on December 28, 2012.  In January 2012, we entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement for the acquisition of 100% of the shares of Atlântica I, Atlântica II, Atlântica IV and Atlântica V wind farms, to be operational in 2013.  We completed the acquisition of the Atlântica wind farms on March 23, 2012. Additionally, the Santa Clara wind farms are ready to start generating energy (although the construction of the transmission line is not yet completed). We have been receiving revenues deriving from the Santa Clara wind farms, as contracted through the “2009 Auction Reserve Energy” (Leilão de Energia de Reserva), since July 2012.

 

19

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

By the end of 2013, when Coopcana and Alvorada biomass Thermoelectric Power Plants, Campo dos Ventos II, Macacos I and Atlântica wind farms are expected to become fully operational, our Installed Capacity may reach 3,169 MW.  By the end of 2016, when we expect the Campo dos Ventos I, III and V wind farms (the “Campo dos Ventos Complex”) and the São Benedito complex to become operational, it may reach 3,327 MW.  Part of these generation facilities have associated long‑term power purchase agreements (“PPAs”), approved by ANEEL, which we believe will ensure us an attractive rate of return on our investment.  We also have a 3,800  MW (of which our share is 2,394  MW) portfolio of projects to be developed in the next years through our subsidiary CPFL Energias Renováveis. As consumption of electricity in Brazil increases, we believe that there will continue to be new opportunities for us to explore investments in additional conventional and renewable generation projects.

Focus on further improving our Net Income operating efficiency.  The distribution of electricity in our distribution concession areas is our largest business segment, representing approximately 69.9% of our consolidated net income.  We continue to focus on improving the quality of our service and maintaining efficient operating costs by exploiting synergies and technologies.  We also make an effort to standardize and update our operations regularly, introducing automated systems where possible.  In 2011, we started the Tauron program, aiming at an efficiency breakthrough based on smart grid technologies that increase our operational efficiency by allowing us to control our operations remotely and avoiding staff’s displacement.  Under the Tauron program, our main projects relate to mobility, telemetry, self-healing, asset management and performance management. We expect to fully implement Tauron project by 2014.

Expand and strengthen our commercialization and services business.  Free Consumers represent a significant segment of the electricity market in Brazil (approximately 27% of the market share).  We strive to enter into bilateral contracts (through our subsidiary CPFL Brasil, our commercialization subsidiary) with former consumers of our distribution companies that become Free Consumers, in addition to attracting additional Free Consumers from outside of our distribution companies’ concession areas.  In order to achieve this objective, we foster positive relationships with customers by providing electricity-related services, strategic advice and decision-making support.

Position ourselves to take advantage of consolidation in our industry by using our experience in successfully integrating and restructuring other operations.  We believe that with the stabilization of the regulatory environment in the Brazilian power industry, there may be substantial consolidation in the generation, the transmission and, particularly, the distribution sectors.  Given our financial strength and managerial expertise, we believe that we are well-positioned to take advantage of this consolidation.  If promising assets are available on attractive terms, we may make acquisitions that complement our existing operations and afford us and our consumers further opportunities to take advantage of economies of scale.

Maintain a high level of social responsibility in the communities in which we operate.  We aim to hold our business operations to the highest standards of social responsibility and sustainable development.  We also support initiatives to advance the economic, cultural and social interests of the communities in which we operate and contribute effectively to their further development.

Follow enhanced corporate governance standards.  We are dedicated to maintaining the highest levels of management transparency and corporate governance, providing equitable shareholder rights and, through various measures, including the increase of our free float and the liquidity of our shares, seeking value for our shareholders.

 

 

20

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Our Service Territory

Distribution

We are one of the largest electricity Distributors in Brazil, based on the amount of electricity we delivered in 2012.  Our eight distribution subsidiaries together supply electricity to a region covering 175,237 square kilometers, primarily in the States of São Paulo and Rio Grande do Sul.  Their concession areas include 559 municipalities and a population of approximately 18 million people.  Together, they provided electricity to approximately 7.2 million consumers as of December 31, 2012.  Our eight subsidiaries distributed approximately 13% of the total electricity distributed in Brazil, based on data from the Energetic Studies Company (Empresa de Pesquisas Energéticas - EPE).

Distribution Companies

We have eight distribution subsidiaries:

·         CPFL Paulista.  Companhia Paulista de Força e Luz (“CPFL Paulista”) supplies electricity to a concession area covering 90,440 square kilometers in the state of São Paulo with a population of approximately 9.5 million people.  Its concession area covers 234 4 municipalities, including the cities of Campinas, Bauru, Ribeirão Preto, São José do Rio Preto, Araraquara and Piracicaba.  CPFL Paulista had approximately 3.9 million consumers as of December 31, 2012.  In 2012, CPFL Paulista distributed 21,521 GWh of electricity, which accounts for approximately 22.0% of the total electricity distributed in the state of São Paulo, and 6.6% of the total electricity distributed in Brazil, during that period.

·         CPFL Piratininga.  Companhia Piratininga de Força e Luz (“CPFL Piratininga”) supplies electricity to a concession area covering 5,618 square kilometers in the southern part of the state of São Paulo with a population of approximately 3.8 million people.  Its concession area covers 27 municipalities, including the cities of Santos, Sorocaba and Jundiaí.  CPFL Piratininga had approximately 1.5 million consumers as of December 31, 2012.  In 2012, CPFL Piratininga distributed 9,156 GWh of electricity, accounting for approximately 11.4% of the total electricity distributed in the state of São Paulo, and 3.4% of the total electricity distributed in Brazil, during that period.


4 These numbers consider municipalities within the concession area of each subsidiary only.  Please note that we also serve consumers in municipalities within the concession area of other concessionaire where, for any reason, those consumers are not assisted by such concessionaire.

21

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

·         RGE.  Rio Grande Energia S.A. (“RGE”) supplies electricity to a concession area covering 58,823 square kilometers in the state of Rio Grande do Sul with a population of approximately 3.7 million people.  Its concession area covers 253 municipalities, including the cities of Caxias do Sul and Gravataí.  RGE had approximately 1.4 million consumers as of December 31, 2012.  In 2012, RGE supplied 7,690 GWh of electricity (6,533 GWh distributed to Final Consumers, and 1,157 GWh delivered principally to small electric concessionaires and small rural cooperatives), which accounts for approximately 33.8% of the total electricity distributed in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, and 2.1% of the total electricity distributed in Brazil, during that period.

·         CPFL Santa Cruz.  Companhia Luz e Força Santa Cruz (“CPFL Santa Cruz”) supplies electricity to a concession area covering 11,870 square kilometers, which includes 24 municipalities in the northwest part of the state of São Paulo and three5 municipalities in the state of Paraná.  In 2012, CPFL Santa Cruz distributed 1,004 GWh of electricity to approximately 191,071 consumers, accounting for approximately 0.8% of the total electricity distributed in the state of São Paulo, and 0.2% of the total electricity distributed in Brazil, during that period.

·         CPFL Jaguari.  Companhia Jaguari de Energia (“CPFL Jaguari”) supplies electricity to a concession area covering 252 square kilometers, which includes two municipalities of the state of São Paulo.  In 2012, CPFL Jaguari distributed 442 GWh of electricity to approximately 34,972 consumers.

·         CPFL Mococa.  Companhia Luz e Força de Mococa (“CPFL Mococa”) supplies electricity to a concession area covering 1,844 square kilometers, which includes one municipality in the state of São Paulo and three5 municipalities in the state of Minas Gerais.  In 2012, CPFL Mococa distributed 202 GWh of electricity to approximately 42,872 consumers.

·         CPFL Leste Paulista.  Companhia Leste Paulista de Energia (“CPFL Leste Paulista”) supplies electricity to a concession area covering 2,589 square kilometers, which includes seven municipalities of the state of São Paulo.  In 2012, CPFL Leste Paulista distributed 266 GWh of electricity to approximately 53,202 consumers.

·         CPFL Sul Paulista.  Companhia Sul Paulista de Energia (“CPFL Sul Paulista”) supplies electricity to a concession area covering 3,802 square kilometers, which includes five municipalities of the state of São Paulo.  In 2012, CPFL Sul Paulista distributed 365 GWh of electricity to approximately 77,505 consumers.

Distribution Network

Our eight distribution subsidiaries own distribution lines with voltage levels ranging from 34.5 kV to 138 kV.  These lines distribute electricity from the connection point with the Basic Network to our power sub-stations, in each of our concession areas.  All consumers that connect to these distribution lines, such as Free Consumers or other concessionaires, are required to pay a tariff for using the system - Tarifa de Uso do Sistema de Distribuição (“TUSD”).

Each of our subsidiaries has a Distribution Network consisting of a widespread network of predominantly overhead lines and sub-stations having successively lower voltage ranges.  Consumers are classified in different voltage levels based on their consumption of, and demand for, electricity.  Large industrial and commercial consumers receive electricity at High Voltage ranges (up to 138 kV) while smaller industrial, commercial and residential consumers receive electricity at lower voltage ranges (2.3 kV and below).

As of December 31, 2012, our Distribution Networks consisted of 235,498 kilometers of distribution lines, including 327,455 distribution transformers.  Our eight distribution subsidiaries had 9,644 km of High Voltage distribution lines between 34.5 kV and 138 kV.  At that date, we had 446 transformer sub-stations for transforming High Voltage into Medium Voltages for subsequent distribution, with total transforming capacity of 13,650 mega-volt amperes.  Of the industrial and commercial consumers in our concession area, 308 had 69 kV, 88 kV or 138 kV high-voltage electricity supplied through direct connections to our High Voltage distribution lines.

22

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

System Performance
Electricity Losses

We experience two types of electricity losses:  technical losses and commercial losses.  Technical losses are those that occur in the ordinary course of our distribution of electricity.  Commercial losses are those that result from illegal connections, fraud or billing errors and similar matters.  Electricity loss rates of our three largest distribution subsidiaries (CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga and RGE) compare favorably to the average for other major Brazilian electricity Distributors in 2011 according to the most recent information available from the Brazilian Association of Electric Energy Distributors, Associação Brasileira de Distribuidores de Energia Elétrica (“ABRADEE”), an industry association.

We are also actively engaged in efforts to reduce commercial losses from illegal connections, fraud or billing errors.  To achieve this, in each of our eight subsidiaries, we have deployed trained technical teams to conduct inspections, enhanced monitoring for irregular consumption, increased replacements for obsolete measuring equipment and developed a computer program to discover and analyze irregular invoicing.  332,777 inspections were conducted during 2012, which we believe led to a recovery of receivables estimated at more than R$42.1 million.

Power Outages

The following table sets forth the frequency and duration of electricity outages per consumer for the years 2012 and 2011 for each of our distribution subsidiaries:

 

Year ended December 31, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CPFL Paulista

CPFL Piratininga

RGE

CPFL Santa Cruz

CPFL
Jaguari

CPFL Mococa

CPFL Leste Paulista

CPFL Sul Paulista

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FEC1

5.37

4.24

8.94

5.83

4.66

5.69

6.57

9.10

DEC2

7.48

5.66

14.61

5.28

4.49

5.83

8.26

10.80

 

__________________

(1)           Frequency of outages per consumer per year (number of outages)

(2)           Duration of outages per consumer per year (in hours)

 

Year ended December 31, 2011

 

 

 

CPFL Paulista

CPFL Piratininga

RGE

CPFL Santa Cruz

CPFL Jaguari

CPFL Mococa

CPFL Leste Paulista

CPFL Sul Paulista

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FEC1

5.36

4.87

9.44

8.15

5.10

5.24

6.17

5.73

DEC2

6.77

6.44

15.19

8.43

7.00

5.95

9.66

9.06

 

__________________

(1)           Frequency of outages per consumer per year (number of outages).

(2)           Duration of outages per consumer per year (in hours).

We seek to improve the quality and reliability of our power supply, as measured by the frequency and duration of our power outages.  According to data from ABRADEE for 2011, our frequency and duration of interruptions per consumer in the past few years compare favorably to the averages for other Brazilian distribution companies.

Based on data published by ANEEL, the duration and frequency of outages at CPFL Paulista and CPFL Piratininga are among the lowest in Brazil compared to companies of similar size. The duration of outages at RGE are comparatively higher than those at CPFL Paulista and CPFL Piratininga, but they remain in line with the average rate for power companies in Southern Brazil mainly as a result of the lack of redundancies in its distribution system, the use of medium voltage lines and a lower level of automation in the network. However, their duration and frequency of outages are below the national average.

23

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

ANEEL establishes performance indicators per consumer to be complied with by power companies.  If these indicators are not reached, we are obliged to reimburse our consumers, and our revenues are negatively affected.  In 2011, according to data from ANEEL, the amount we reimbursed our consumers was lower than the average amount reimbursed by power companies of similar size.

Our distribution subsidiaries have construction and maintenance technology that allows for repairs of the electricity network without interruption in electricity service, which allows us to have low levels of scheduled interruption, amounting to approximately up to 14% of total interruptions.  Unscheduled interruptions due to accidents or natural causes, including lightning storms, fire and wind represented the remainder of our total interruptions.  In 2012, we invested a total of R$1,403 million in improvements of (i) the logistics of our operations, (ii) our systems, and (iii) our infrastructure to support operations, across our different business segments.  We expect to invest an additional R$1,033 million for such purposes in 2013.

We strive to improve response times for our repair services.  The quality indicators for the provision of energy by CPFL Paulista and CPFL Piratininga have maintained levels of excellence while complying with regulatory standards.  This was also mainly the result of our efficient operational logistics, including the strategic positioning of our teams and the technology and automation of our network and operation centers, together with a preventive maintenance and conservation plan.

Purchases of Electricity

Most of the electricity we sell is purchased from unrelated parties, rather than generated by our facilities.  In 2012, 11.2% of the total electricity our distribution subsidiaries acquired was purchased from our generation subsidiaries.

In 2012, we purchased 10,781 GWh of electricity from the Itaipu power plant, amounting to 17.9% of the total electricity we purchased.  Itaipu is located on the border of Brazil and Paraguay and is subject to a bilateral treaty between the two countries pursuant to which Brazil has committed to purchasing specified amounts of electricity.  This treaty will expire in 2023.  Electric utilities operating under concessions in the Midwest, South and Southeast regions of Brazil are required by law to purchase a portion of the electricity that Brazil is obligated to purchase from Itaipu.  The amounts that these companies must purchase are governed by take-or-pay contracts with tariffs established in US$/kW.  ANEEL annually determines the amount of electricity to be sold by Itaipu.  We pay for energy purchased from Itaipu in accordance with the ratio between the volume established by ANEEL and our statutorily established share, regardless of whether Itaipu generates such amount of electricity, at a price of US$24.88/kW.  Our purchases represent approximately 17.0% of Itaipu’s total supply to Brazil.  This share was fixed by law according to the amount of electricity sold in 1991.  The rates at which companies are required to purchase Itaipu’s electricity are established pursuant to the bilateral treaty, and fixed to cover Itaipu’s operating expenses and payments of principal and interest on Itaipu’s U.S. dollar‑denominated debts, as well as the cost of transmitting the power to their concession areas.

The Itaipu plant has an exclusive transmission network.  Distribution companies pay a fee for the use of this network.

In 2012, we paid an average of R$104.98 per MWh for purchases of electricity from Itaipu, as compared to R$89.68 during 2011 and R$93.23 during 2010.  These figures do not include the transmission fee.

We purchased 49,471 GWh of electricity in 2012 from generating companies other than Itaipu, representing 82.1% of the total electricity we purchased.  We paid an average of R$113.95 per MWh for purchases of electricity from generating companies other than Itaipu, as compared to R$110.73 per MWh in 2011 and R$109.47 per MWh in 2010.  For more information on the Regulated Market and the Free Market, see “—The Brazilian Power Industry—The New Industry Model Law.”

The following table shows amounts purchased from our suppliers in the Regulated Market and in the Free Market, for the periods indicated.

24

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2012

2011

2010

 

(in GWh)

Energy purchased for resale

 

 

 

Itaipu Binacional

10,781

10,855

10,835

Electric Energy Trading Chamber - CCEE

8,656

5,002

3,373

PROINFA

1,070

1,032

1,133

Energy purchased in the Regulated Market and through bilateral contracts

39,745

33,964

37,043

TOTAL

60,252

50,853

52,384

 

The provisions of our electricity supply contracts are governed by ANEEL regulations.  The main provisions of each contract relate to the amount of electricity purchased, the price, including adjustments for various factors such as inflation indexes, and the duration of the contract.

As from 2013, all distribution companies in Brazil purchase electricity from power producers which concessions were renewed in accordance with Law 12,783/13. The tariffs and electricity amounts to be purchased by each distribution company, as well as the provisions of the applicable agreements between distribution companies and power producers, will be defined by ANEEL.  We expect that tariffs for the purchase of electricity by distributors will be lower than the current average energy prices.

Transmission Tariffs.  In 2012, we paid a total of R$1,574 million in tariffs for the use of the transmission network, including Basic Network tariffs, connection tariffs and Transmission of high-voltage electricity from Itaipu at rates set by ANEEL.

Consumers and Tariffs

Consumers

We classify our consumers into five principal categories.  See note 25  to our audited consolidated financial statements for a breakdown of our sales by category.

·         Industrial consumers.  Sales to final industrial consumers accounted for 25.7% of our revenue of electricity sales in 2012.

·         Residential consumers.  Sales to final residential consumers accounted for 41.7% of our revenue of electricity sales in 2012.

·         Commercial consumers.  Sales to final commercial consumers, which include service businesses, universities and hospitals, accounted for 21.3% of our revenue of electricity sales in 2012.

·         Rural consumers.  Sales to final rural consumers accounted for 3.1% of our revenue of electricity sales in 2012.

·         Other consumers.  Sales to other consumers, which include public and municipal services such as street lighting, accounted for 8.2% of our revenue of electricity sales in 2012.

Retail Distribution Tariffs.  We classify our consumers into two different groups, Group A consumers and Group B consumers, based on the voltage level at which the electricity is supplied to them.  Each consumer is placed in a certain tariff level defined by law and based on its respective classification.  Some discounts are available depending on the consumer classification, tariff level or environment for trading (Free Consumers and generators).  Group B consumers pay higher tariffs.  Tariffs in Group B vary by type of consumer (residential, rural, other categories and public lighting).  Consumers in Group A pay lower tariffs, decreasing from A4 to Al, because they are supplied electricity at higher voltages, which requires lower use of the energy distribution system.  The tariffs we charge for sales of electricity to Final Consumers are determined pursuant to our concession agreements and regulations ratified by ANEEL.  These concession agreements and related regulations establish a cap on tariffs that provides for annual, periodic and extraordinary adjustments.  For a discussion of the regulatory regime applicable to our tariffs and their adjustment, see “—The Brazilian Power Industry.”

25

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Group A consumers receive electricity at 2.3 kV or higher.  Tariffs for Group A consumers are based on the voltage level at which electricity is supplied, and the time of day electricity is supplied.  The consumers may opt for a different tariff applicable in peak periods in order to optimize the use of the electric network.  Tariffs for Group A consumers consist of two components:  TUSD and an “energy charge.”  The TUSD, expressed in reais  per kW, is based on the (i) contracted firm capacity or (ii) power capacity actually used.  The energy charge, expressed in reais  per MWh, is based on the amount of electricity actually consumed.  Group A consumers are those that may opt to purchase electricity in the Free Market under the New Industry Model Law.  See “—The Brazilian Power Industry—The New Industry Model Law.”

Group B consumers receive electricity at less than 2.3 kV (220V and 127V).  Tariffs for Group B consumers consist of a demand and an energy consumption charge, both charged in R$/MWh.

The following tables set forth our average retail prices for each consumer category for 2012 and 2011.  These prices include taxes (ICMS, PIS and COFINS) and were calculated based on our revenues and the volume of electricity sold in 2012 and 2011.

 

Year ended December 31, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CPFL Paulista

CPFL Piratininga

RGE

CPFL Santa Cruz

CPFL Leste Paulista

CPFL Sul Paulista

CPFL Jaguari

CPFL Mococa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(R$/MWh)

Residential

435.92

421.82

574.07

499.93

517.27

484.53

408.83

561.97

Industrial

337.54

323.62

387.23

369.94

405.36

342.09

287.36

366.44

Commercial

362.04

369.08

542.93

445.90

481.60

441.20

366.92

467.04

Rural

201.74

230.32

286.14

238.51

265.33

252.28

215.05

270.56

Other

268.94

263.54

212.53

199.61

343.06

313.66

263.45

322.24

Total

364.69

364.89

416.12

367.08

407.33

393.87

313.75

423.06

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CPFL Paulista

CPFL Piratininga

RGE

CPFL Santa Cruz

CPFL Leste Paulista

CPFL Sul Paulista

CPFL Jaguari

CPFL Mococa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(R$/MWh)

Residential

416.68

418.90

541.53

483.21

511.15

481.14

404.51

551.81

Industrial

322.85

313.27

365.08

373.34

416.55

325.14

292.58

355.70

Commercial

349.56

366.33

516.05

437.55

476.79

457.17

363.79

461.81

Rural

192.31

226.27

278.91

235.28

257.46

252.16

211.65

264.64

Other

263.01

278.88

375.98

312.84

340.36

308.73

262.51

317.38

Total

348.63

359.99

440.20

399.14

400.59

384.20

314.96

409.66

 

Under current regulations, residential consumers may be eligible to pay reduced tariffs if:  (i) their monthly earnings are equal or lower than half of the minimum wage, (ii) their monthly earnings are lower than three minimum wages, and one (or more) of the family members has a disease that requires continuous use of an electric-powered equipment, or (iii) they receive certain benefits under Brazilian government’s social programs.  In order to benefit from the regulations, these consumers must register with the respective federal government registry.  The discounts applied to the tariffs depend on the amount of energy consumed.  Discounts range from 10% to 65% for energy consumption varying from 30 KW to 220 KW per month.  Another benefit afforded to these residential consumers is that they are not required to pay the Proinfa Program charge or any extraordinary tariff approved by ANEEL.

TUSD.  Under applicable laws and regulations, we are required to allow other concessionaire’s consumers  to use our high‑voltage distribution system, including Free Consumers within our distribution concession areas that are supplied by other distributors.  All of our consumers must also pay a fee for the use of our network (TUSD).  In 2012, tariff revenues for the use of our network by Free Consumers amounted to R$1,412 million.  The average tariff for the use of our network was R$89.07/MWh and R$90.03/MWh in 2012 and 2011, respectively, including the TUSD we charge to other distributors connected to our Distribution Networks.

26

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Billing Procedures

The procedure we use for billing and payment for electricity supplied to our consumers is determined by consumer and tariff categories.  Meter readings and invoicing take place on a monthly basis for Low Voltage consumers, with the exception of rural consumers, whose meters are read in intervals varying from one to three months, as authorized by relevant regulation.  Bills are issued from meter readings or on the basis of estimated usage.  Low voltage consumers are billed within three business days after the meter reading, with payment required until five business days after the invoice presentation date.  In case of nonpayment, we send the consumer a notice of nonpayment with the following month’s invoice and we allow the consumer up to 15 days to settle the amount owed to us.  If payment is not received within three business days after that 15-day period, the consumer’s electricity supply may be suspended.  We may also take other measures, such as inclusion of the consumer in the list of debtors of credit reporting agencies, or extrajudicial or judicial collection through collection agencies.

High voltage consumers are billed on a monthly basis with payment required within five business days after the receipt of invoice.  In the event of nonpayment, we send the consumer a notice up to four business days, giving a deadline of 15 days to make payment.  If payment is not made within three business days after that 15‑day period, the consumer’s service is discontinued.

According to data from ABRADEE for 2011, the percentage of customers in default of our three largest distribution subsidiaries compare favorably to the average for other major Brazilian electricity distributors.  For this purpose, consumers in default are consumers whose bills are one to 90 days due.  Bills due for over 90 days are deemed not recoverable.

Customer Service

We strive to provide high-quality customer service to our distribution consumers.  We operate call centers at each of our distribution subsidiaries providing customer service 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.  In 2012, our call centers responded to approximately 12.0 million calls.  We also provide customer service through our Internet website, which handled approximately 12.3 million customer requests in 2012, and through our branch offices, which handled approximately 3.2 million customer requests in 2012.  The growth in electronic requests has allowed us to reduce our customer service costs and provide customer service through our call center to a larger number of customers without access to the Internet.  Following receipt of a customer service request, we dispatch our technicians to make any necessary repairs.

Generation of Electricity

We are actively expanding our generating capacity.  In accordance with Brazilian regulation, revenues from generation are based mainly on Assured Energy of each facility, rather than its Installed Capacity or actual output.  Assured Energy is a fixed output of electricity established by the Brazilian government in the relevant concession agreement.  For certain companies, actual output is determined periodically by the ONS in view of demand and hydrological conditions.  Provided generators have sold their electricity and participate in the MRE, they will receive at least the revenue amount corresponding to the Assured Energy, even if they do not actually generate all of it.  Conversely, if a generating facility’s output exceeds its Assured Energy, its incremental revenue is equal only to the costs associated therewith.  Most of our Hydroelectric Power Plants are members of the MRE, which mitigates hydrologic risks.

At December 31, 2012, CPFL Geração owned a 51.54% interest in the Assured Energy from the Serra da Mesa power plant.  Through our generation subsidiaries CERAN, BAESA, ENERCAN and Chapecoense, CPFL Geração also owned interests in the Monte Claro, Barra Grande, Campos Novos, Castro Alves, 14 de Julho and Foz do Chapecó plants, which have been operational since December 2004, November 2005, February 2007, March 2008, December 2008 and October 2010, respectively.  Through CPFL Jaguari Geração, we owned a 6.93% interest in the Luis Eduardo Magalhães power plant.  We also hold authorization to operate three Thermoelectric Power Plants, two of which were acquired in 2009 (Termonordeste and Termoparaíba) through the acquisition of EPASA (a subsidiary of CPFL Geração).  Termonordeste started operations on December 24, 2010 and Termoparaíba, on January 13, 2011. 

27

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

In February 2012, we completed the installation of a lowering system in the Foz do Chapecó generating units. Through this system, we helped the ONS control the reactive power in the region.  ANEEL will reimburse our investment in Foz do Chapecó in five years, through which we expect to increase our revenues.

Bio Ipê and Bio Pedra Thermoelectric Power Plants started operations in May 17, 2012 and May 31, 2012, respectively.   We have been receiving revenues deriving from the Santa Clara wind farms, as contracted through the “2009 Auction Reserve Energy” (Leilão de Energia de Reserva), since July 2012. Although the construction of the Transmission line is not yet completed, these wind farms are ready to start generating energy. On November 27, 2012 and December 28, 2012, the Tanquinho solar power plant and Santo Góes Small Hydroelectric Power Plant started operations.

In 2012, we also completed the acquisition of the Atlântica and Bons Ventos wind farms and the Ester Thermoelectric Power Plant in March, June, and October, respectively.

CPFL Geração was a winner in the auction of electric energy transmission held in December 2012.  CPFL Geração obtained the right to build, maintain and operate the Piracicaba Substation, located in the state of São Paulo, with installed capacity of 800 MVA, more than than 80,000 square meters of area and within approximately 5 km of the CPFL Paulista Substation.  The concession is for a 30-year term.  Although the Piracicaba Substation is a Transmission asset, it will attend CPFL Paulista’s Distribution Network in Piracicaba.  Our Allowed Annual Revenue equals R$8,87 million.  On December 19, 2012, we established CPFL Transmissão Piracicaba to operate the Piracicaba Substation.

At December 31, 2012, through our subsidiaries CPFL Geração and CPFL Brasil, we owned 63.0% interest in CPFL Energias Renováveis, a company resulting from an association with ERSA, and which holds our subsidiaries engaged in the generation of electricity from renewable sources.  We have fully consolidated CPFL Energias Renováveis in our financial statements since August 1, 2011, upon the incorporation of SMITA by ERSA.  On a meeting held on March 8, 2012, our Board of Directors approved the engagement of investment banks to commence studies regarding a potential public offering of CPFL Energias Renováveis.  However, due to market conditions, on October 4, 2012, CPFL Energias Renováveis filed with the Brazilian Securities Commission, Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (“CVM”), a request for cancellation of the registration process of its intend public offering.  As of the date of this annual report, CPFL Energias Renováveis is comprised of:

·         18 subsidiaries involved in the generation of electric energy through 35 Small Hydroelectric Power Plants in operation, with total Installed Capacity of 326.6 MW, located in the states of São Paulo, Santa Catarina, Rio Grande do Sul, Minas Gerais and Mato Grosso;

·         33 subsidiaries involved in the generation of electric energy from wind sources, of which (i) fifteen 5 are operational, with total Installed Capacity of 555.5 MW, located in the state of Ceará and Rio Grande do Norte, and (ii) 18 are under construction, with an estimated Installed Capacity of 482 MW, scheduled to start operations between 2013 and 2016;

·         eight subsidiaries involved in the generation of electric energy from biomass, of which (i) six are operational, with total Installed Capacity of 270 MW, located in the states of São Paulo and Rio Grande do Norte and (ii) two are under construction, with an estimated Installed Capacity of 100 MW, scheduled to start operations in 2013.  On August 27, 2010, our first sugarcane bagasse-powered plant started operations, through CPFL Bioenergia (Baldin energy generation plant) with 45 MW of Installed Capacity.  CPFL Bio Formosa began operations on September 2, 2011, with Installed Capacity of 40 MW.  CPFL Bio Buriti became operational on October 7, 2011 with Installed Capacity of 50 MW.  Bio Ipê became operational on May 17, 2012 with Installed Capacity of 25 MW.  Bio Pedra became operational on May 31, 2012 with Installed Capacity of 70 MW.  We completed the acquisition of Ester Thermoelectric Power Plant on October 18, 2012.  Ester has an Installed Capacity of 40 MW;


5 This number includes seven wind farms in Santa Clara complex with an istalled capacity of 188 MW.  We have been receiving revenues deriving from the Santa Clara wind farms, as contracted through the “2009 Auction Reserve Energy” (Leilão de Energia de Reserva), since July 2012. Although the construction of the Transmission line is not yet completed, these wind farms are ready to start generating energy.

28

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

·         one subsidiary involved in the generation of electric energy from solar power plant, with total Installed Capacity of 1.1 MW, located in the state of São Paulo. On November 27, 2012, the Tanquinho Plant started operations and is expected to generate approximately 1.6 GWh/year.

We also owned 12 Small Hydroelectric Power Plants through CPFL Geração and certain of our distribution companies at December 31, 2012.

Our total Installed Capacity from all of these facilities was 2,961 MW as of December 31, 2012.  Most of the electricity we produce come from our Hydroelectric Power Plants. We generated 10,570 GWh in 2012, 9,638 GWh in 2011 and 9,142 GWh in 2010.

At the request of ANEEL, in January 2013, we completed the transfer of the Substation and the exclusive Transmission lines of Foz do Chapecó to the Basic Network, therefore reducing regulatory losses deriving from the plants’ Assured Energy from 1.61% to 0.29% and eliminating maintenance costs.  We expect to reduce our costs in approximately R$7 million annually.

We are currently involved in the construction of Alvorada and Coopcana co‑generation plants, the Campo dos Ventos II wind farm and the wind farms of the Macacos I, São Benedito, Atlântica and the Campo dos Ventos complexes. We are also currently engaged in refurbishment of the CERAN complex.  We are installing equipment to assure the free flow of water in the three hydroelectrical plants and therefore increase their availability. We expect to complete the refurbishment at CERAN by 2014. 

The following table sets forth certain information relating to our principal facilities in operation as of December 31, 2012

 

Holding company

Partic.

Capacity (MW)

 

Assured Energy (GWh)

 

Placed in service

Facility upgraded

Concession expires

Hydroelectric plants:

 

 

Our share

TOTAL

 

Our share

TOTAL

 

 

 

 

Serra da Mesa

CPFL Geração

51.54%

657.1

1,275.0

 

3,029.5

5,878.0

 

1998

 

2028(1)

Monte Claro

CPFL Geração

65%

84.5

130.0

 

335.9

516.8

 

2004

 

2036

Barra Grande

CPFL Geração

25.01%

172.6

690.0

 

833.9

3,334.1

 

2005

 

2036

Campos Novos

CPFL Geração

48.72%

428.7

880.0

 

1,612.8

3,310.4

 

2007

 

2035

Castro Alves

CPFL Geração

65%

84.5

130.0

 

364.4

560.6

 

2008

 

2036

14 de Julho

CPFL Geração

65%

65.0

100.0

 

284.7

438.0

 

2008

 

2036

Luis Eduardo Magalhães

CPFL Jaguari Geração

6.93%

62.5

902.5

 

319.7

4,613.0

 

2001

 

2032

Foz do Chapecó

CPFL Geração

51%

436.1

855.0

 

1,930.0

3,784.3

 

2010

 

2036

SUBTOTAL - Hydroelectric plants

 

 

1.991,0

 

 

8,710.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thermoelectric plants:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carioba

CPFL Geração

100%

36.0

36.0

 

93.7

93.7

 

1954

 

2027

EPASA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Termonordeste

CPFL Geração

52.75%

90.1

170.8

 

572.1

1,084.5

 

2010

 

2042

Termoparaíba

CPFL Geração

52.75%

90.1

170.8

 

572.1

1,084.5

 

2011

 

2042

SUBTOTAL - Thermoelectric plants

 

 

216,2

 

 

1,237.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Renewable sources

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Small Hydroelectric Plants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cariobinha

CPFL Geração

100%

1.3

1.3

 

-

-

 

1936

(2)

2027

Salto do Pinhal

CPFL Geração

100%

0.6

0.6

 

-

-

 

1911

(2)

2027

Ponte do Silva

CPFL Geração

100%

0.1

0.1

 

-

-

 

1956

(3)

2027

Lavrinha

CPFL Sul Paulista

100%

0.3

0.3

 

(4)

 

 

1947

(3)

 

Macaco Branco

CPFL Jaguari

100%

2.4

2.4

 

(4)

 

 

1911

 

2042

Pinheirinho

CPFL Mococa

100%

0.6

0.6

 

(4)

 

 

1911

(3)

 

Rio do Peixe I

CPFL Leste Paulista

100%

3.1

3.1

 

(4)

 

 

1925

 

2042

Rio do Peixe II

CPFL Leste Paulista

100%

15.0

15.0

 

(4)

 

 

1998

 

2042

Santa Alice

CPFL Leste Paulista

100%

0.6

0.6

 

(4)

 

 

1907

(3)

 

São José

CPFL Sul Paulista

100%

0.8

0.8

 

(4)

 

 

1934

(3)

 

São Sebastião

CPFL Mococa

100%

0.7

0.7

 

(4)

 

 

1925

(3)

 

Turvinho

CPFL Sul Paulista

100%

0.8

0.8

 

(4)

 

 

1912

(3)

 

 

29

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

Americana

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

18.9

30.0

 

44.7

71.0

 

1949

2002

2027

Andorinhas

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

0.3

0.5

 

2.3

3.7

 

1940

 

(3)

Buritis

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

0.5

0.8

 

1.9

3.1

 

1922

 

2027

Capão Preto

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

2.7

4.3

 

12.6

20.0

 

1911

2008

2027

Chibarro

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

1.6

2.6

 

9.3

14.8

 

1912

2008

2027

Dourados

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

6.8

10.8

 

38.6

61.2

 

1926

2002

2027

Eloy Chaves

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

11.8

18.8

 

64.0

101.5

 

1954

1993

2027

Esmeril

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

3.2

5.0

 

15.9

25.2

 

1912

2003

2027

Gavião Peixoto

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

3.0

4.8

 

21.1

33.5

 

1913

2007

2027

Guaporé

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

0.4

0.7

 

3.1

4.9

 

1950

 

(3)

Jaguari

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

7.4

11.8

 

44.7

71.0

 

1917

2002

2027

Lençóis

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

1.1

1.7

 

8.4

13.3

 

1917

1988

2027

Monjolinho

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

0.4

0.6

 

1.5

2.5

 

1893

2003

2027

Pinhal

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

4.3

6.8

 

20.4

32.4

 

1928

1993

2027

Pirapó

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

0.5

0.8

 

3.2

5.1

 

1952

(3)

 

Saltinho

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

0.5

0.8

 

4.0

6.4

 

1950

(3)

 

Salto Grande

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

2.9

4.6

 

14.2

22.6

 

1912

2003

2027

Socorro

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

0.6

1.0

 

3.0

4.7

 

1909

1994

2027

Santana

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

2.7

4.3

 

14.5

23.0

 

1951

2002

2027

Três Saltos

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

0.4

0.6

 

3.0

4.7

 

1928

 

2027

São Joaquim

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

5.1

8.1

 

28.0

44.5

 

1911

2002

2027

Diamante

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

2.6

4.2

 

8.8

14.0

 

2005

 

2019

Santa Luzia

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

18.0

28.5

 

101.7

161.4

 

2007

 

2037

Arvoredo

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

8.2

13.0

 

42.9

68.1

 

2010

 

 

Alto Irani

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

13.2

21.0

 

75.6

120.0

 

2008

 

2032

Plano Alto

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

10.1

16.0

 

56.7

90.0

 

2008

 

2032

Barra da Paciência

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

14.5

23.0

 

75.1

119.1

 

2011

 

2029

Cocais Grande

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

6.3

10.0

 

28.3

44.9

 

2009

 

2029

Corrente Grande

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

8.8

14.0

 

44.9

71.3

 

2011

 

2030

Ninho da Águia

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

6.3

10.0

 

35.9

56.9

 

2011

 

2029

Paiol

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

12.6

20.0

 

60.8

96.5

 

2010

 

2032

São Gonçalo

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

6.9

11.0

 

41.9

66.6

 

2010

 

2030

Varginha

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

5.7

9.0

 

29.7

47.2

 

2010

 

2029

Várzea Alegre

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

4.7

7.5

 

26.9

42.7

 

2011

 

2029

Salto Góes

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

12.6

20.0

 

61.3

97.2

 

2012

 

2043

SUBTOTAL - Small Hydroelectric power plants

 

231.9

352.9

 

1,048.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thermoelectric biomass plants:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Baldin (CPFL Bioenergia)

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

28.4

45.0

 

70.6

112.41

 

2010

 

2039

Bio Buriti

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

31.5

50.0

 

116.0

184.1

 

2011

 

2040

Bio Formosa

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

25.2

40.0

 

88.5

140.4

 

2011

 

2032

Bio Ipê

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

15.8

25.0

 

45.2

71.7

 

2012

 

2041

Bio Pedra

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

44.1

70.0

 

134.7

213.7

 

2012

 

2047

Bio Ester

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

25.2

40.0

 

56.3

89.4

 

2012

 

2045

SUBTOTAL - Thermoelectric biomass plants

 

170.2

270.0

 

511.3

811.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wind farm plants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Praia Formosa

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

66,2

105.0

 

165.0

252.6

 

2009

 

2033

Icaraizinho

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

34,4

54.6

 

56.8

266.2

 

2009

 

2033

Choró

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

15,9

25.2

 

69.0

64.6

 

2009

 

2033

Paracuru

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

15,9

25.2

 

144.6

110.2

 

2008

 

2036

Taiba

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

10.6

16.8

 

37.0

58.8

 

2008

 

2032

Bons Ventos

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

31.8

50.4

 

117.3

186.2

 

2010

 

2033

Canoa Quebrada

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

37.0

58.8

 

132.9

210.9

 

2010

 

2032

Enacel

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

19.8

31.5

 

73.4

116.5

 

2010

 

2032

Santa Clara I

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

18.9

30.0

 

75.6

120.0

 

2011

 

2045

Santa Clara II

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

18.9

30.0

 

70.1

111.3

 

2011

 

2045

Santa Clara III

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

18.9

30.0

 

69.0

109.5

 

2011

 

2045

Santa Clara IV

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

18.9

30.0

 

67.9

107.7

 

2011

 

2045

Santa Clara V

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

18.9

30.0

 

68.4

108.6

 

2011

 

2045

Santa Clara VI

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

18.9

30.0

 

67.3

106.9

 

2011

 

2045

Eurus VI

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

5.0

8.0

 

17.1

27.2

 

2011

 

2045

SUBTOTAL - Wind Farms

 

 

350.0

555.5

 

1,231.4

1,957.2

 

 

 

 

Solar power plant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tanquinho

CPFL Renováveis

63.00%

0.7

1.1

 

1.0

1.7

 

2012

 

 

SUBTOTAL – Solar power plant

 

 

0.7

1.1

 

1.0

1.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL (our share only)  

 

 

2,961

 

 

12.741.4

 

 

 

 

 

__________________

(1)           The concession for Serra da Mesa is held by Furnas.  We have a contractual right to 51.54% of the Assured Energy of this facility, under a 30-year rental agreement, expiring in 2028.

(2)           Power plants that are not active.

(3)           Hydroelectric projects with an Installed Capacity equal to or less than 1,000 kW that are registered with the regulatory authority and the administrator of power concessions, but do not require concession or authorization processes for operating.

(4)           Power plants that currently do not have Assured Energy approved by the MME.  The energy that they produce is used by our distribution subsidiaries, reducing our energy purchases.  We have applied for the assignment of a total of 78.6 GWh per year of Assured Energy for these nine Small Hydroelectric Power Plants and are waiting for MME and ANEEL approval.

30

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Hydroelectric plants

Serra da Mesa.  Our largest Hydroelectric Facility in operation is the Serra da Mesa facility, which we acquired in 2001 from VBC, one of our controlling shareholders.  Furnas began construction of the Serra da Mesa facility in 1985.  In 1994, construction was suspended due to a lack of resources, which led to a public bidding procedure in order to resume construction.  Serra da Mesa currently consists of three Hydroelectric Facilities located on the Tocantins River in the state of Goiás.  The Serra da Mesa facility began operations in 1998 and has an Installed Capacity of 1,275 MW.  The concession for the Serra da Mesa facility is owned by Furnas, which is also the operator, and we own part of the facility.  Under Furnas’ rental agreement with us, which has a 30-year term commencing in 1998, we have the right to 51.54% of the Assured Energy of the Serra da Mesa facility until 2028, irrespective of the actual electricity produced by the facility, even if, during the term of the concession, there is an expropriation or forfeiture of the concession or the term of the concession expires.  We sell all of such electricity to Furnas under an electricity purchase contract that expires in 2014 at a price that is adjusted annually based on the IGP-M.  After the expiration of this electricity purchase arrangement with Furnas, we will retain, until 2028, the right to 51.54% of the Assured Energy of Serra da Mesa.  We will be allowed to commercialize it in accordance with regulations applicable at such time.  Our share of the Installed Capacity and Assured Energy of the Serra da Mesa facility is 657 MW and 3,030 GWh/year, respectively.  On April 27, 2012, the MME published Ordinance No. 262, which extended the concession for Serra da Mesa to November 12, 2039.

CERAN Complex.  We own a 65.0% interest in CERAN, a subsidiary that was granted a 35-year concession in March 2001 to construct, finance and operate the CERAN hydroelectric complex.  The other shareholders are CEEE (30.0%) and Desenvix (5.0%).  The CERAN hydroelectric complex consists of three Hydroelectric Power Plants:  Monte Claro, Castro Alves and 14 de Julho.  The complex is located on the Antas River approximately 120 km north of Porto Alegre, near the city of Bento Gonçalves, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul.  The entire CERAN Complex has an Installed Capacity of 360 MW and estimated Assured Energy of 1,515.5 GWh per year, of which our share will be 985.1 GWh/year.  We sell our participation in the Assured Energy of this complex to affiliates in our group.  These facilities are operated by CERAN, under CPFL Geração’s supervision.

Monte Claro (CERAN Complex).  In 2004, Monte Claro’s first generating unit became operational, with an Installed Capacity of 65 MW and Assured Energy of 509.8 GWh a year, and in 2006, the second generating unit became operational, with an Installed Capacity of 65 MW and Assured Energy of 7.0 GWh per year.  The plant has a total of 130 MW in Installed Capacity and 516.8 GWh in Assured Energy per year.

Castro Alves (CERAN Complex).  In March 2008, the first generation unit of the Castro Alves plant became operational, with an Installed Capacity of 43.4 MW and annual Assured Energy of 353.0 GWh.  In April 2008, the second generation unit became operational, with an Installed Capacity of 43.4 MW and annual Assured Energy of 207.6 GWh.  In June 2008, this plant became fully operational (when the third generation unit started operations), with a total Installed Capacity of 130 MW and annual Assured Energy of 560.6 GWh.  Castro Alves added 84.5 MW to our capacity and an annual Assured Energy of 364.4 GWh.

14 de Julho (CERAN Complex).  The first generation unit of the 14 de Julho plant became operational in December 2008, and the second generation unit became fully operational in March, 2009.  This plant has a total Installed Capacity of 100 MW and an annual Assured Energy of 438.0 GWh. 14 de Julho added 65 MW to our capacity and an annual Assured Energy of 284.7 GWh.

Barra Grande.  This facility became fully operational on May 1, 2006 with a total Installed Capacity of 690 MW and total Assured Energy of 3,334.1 GWh per year.  CPFL Geração owns a 25.01% interest in this plant.  The other shareholders of the joint venture are Alcoa (42.18%), CBA (Companhia Brasileira de Alumínio) (15.00%), DME (Departamento Municipal de Eletricidade de Poços de Caldas) (8.82%), and Camargo Corrêa Cimentos S.A. (9.00%).  We sell our participation in the Assured Energy of this facility to affiliates in our group.

Campos Novos.  We own a 48.72% interest in ENERCAN, a joint venture formed by a consortium of private and public sector companies that was granted a 35-year concession in May 2000 to construct, finance and operate the Campos Novos Hydroelectric Facility.  The plant was constructed on the Canoas River in the state of Santa Catarina, and became fully operational on May 1, 2007 with a total Installed Capacity of 880 MW and Assured Energy of 3,310.4 GWh per year, of which our interest is 1,612.9 GWh per year.  The other shareholders of ENERCAN are CBA (24.73%), Votorantim Metais Níqueis S.A. (20.04%) and CEEE (6.51%).  The plant is operated by ENERCAN under CPFL Geração’s supervision.  This plant increased our Installed Capacity by 428.8 MW.  We sell our participation in the Assured Energy of this joint venture to affiliates in our group.

31

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Foz do Chapecó.  We own a 51.0% interest in Chapecoense, a joint venture formed by a consortium of private and public sector companies that was granted a 35-year concession in November 2001 to construct, finance and operate the Foz do Chapecó Hydroelectric Facility.  The remaining 49.0% interest in the joint venture is divided among Furnas, which holds a 40% interest, and CEEE, which holds a 9.0% interest.  The Foz do Chapecó Hydroelectric Power Plant is located on the Uruguay River, on the border between the states of Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul.  The first generating unit started operations on October 14, 2010, the second one on November 23, 2010, the third one on December 30, 2010 and the fourth one on March 12, 2011.  The Foz do Chapecó Hydroelectric Power Plant has added 436.1 MW to our Installed Capacity.  Of our 51% share in the Assured Energy of this project, we sell 40% to affiliates in our group and 11% through CCEARs.

Luis Eduardo Magalhães Power Plant.  We own a 6.93% interest in the Luis Eduardo Magalhães power plant, also known as UHE Lajeado.  The plant is located on the Tocantins river in the state of Tocantins, and became fully operational in November 2002 with a total Installed Capacity of 902.5 MW and Assured Energy of 4,613 GWh per year.  The plant was built by Investco S.A., a consortium comprised of Lajeado Energia, EDP (Energias de Portugal), CEB (Companhia Energética de Brasília) and Paulista Lajeado (which we acquired in 2007).

Thermoelectric power plants

We have authorization to operate three Thermoelectric Power Plants.  Termonordeste and Termoparaíba are powered by fuel oil from the EPASA complex, with total Installed Capacity of 341.6 MW and Assured Energy of 2,169.0 GWh.  We own an aggregate 52.75% interest in Termonordeste and Termoparaíba.  The Termonordeste and Termoparaíba Thermoelectric Power Plants are located in the city of João Pessoa, in the state of Paraíba.  The construction of these plants began in October 2009.  The electricity of these power plants was sold in CCEARs, and part of this energy was bought by our own distributors. Termonordeste became operational on December 24, 2010, and Termoparaíba on January 13, 2011.

The Carioba facility has an Installed Capacity of 36 MW; however, it is officially out of operations since October 19, 2011 per Order No. 4,101 of 2011.  We have applied to terminate Carioba’s concession once ANEEL reduced the subsidy associated with the Fuel Usage Quota Account (Conta de Consumo de Combustível) (the “CCC Account”).  ANEEL has recommended that the MME terminates the Carioba’s concession.  The MME is currently analyzing the request.   

Small Hydroelectric Power Plants

We operate 47 Small Hydroelectric Power Plants, of which 35 are owned by CPFL Energias Renováveis, three by CPFL Geração and nine by some of our distribution companies.  Since 1988, we have been investing in their renovation and automation to increase their output.  The program principally involves the replacement of existing turbines and upgrade of peripheral equipment and automated systems, as well as restoring infrastructure.  Through these initiatives, we hope to increase these plants’ Assured Energy and electricity production and reduce operational costs.  For instance, due to the modernization projects we carried out at Gavião Peixoto, Chibarro and Capão Preto in 2004 through 2006, the MME approved new Assured Energy levels at these plants, which increased from 19.3 GWh per year to 33.5 GWh per year for Gavião Peixoto, from 6.1 GWh per year to 14.8 GWh per year for Chibarro and from 8.7 GWh per year to 19.9 GWh per year for Capão Preto.

The automation of these power plants allows us to carry out control, supervision and operations remotely.  Since we acquired CPFL Renováveis, we have established an operational center for the management and monitoring of our power plants in the city of São Paulo (in the state of SP), and in the city of Fortaleza (in the state of Ceará). We have also established an operational center to management and monitor our wind farms, so that the entire production cycle of our power plants are now remotely controlled in real time.

Biomass Thermoelectric Power Plants

CPFL Bioenergia.  In partnership with Baldin Bioenergia, we have constructed a co-generation plant in the city of Pirassununga, in the state of São Paulo.  The construction began in October 2008 and the plant became operational on August 27, 2010.  This co-generation plant has added 45.0 MW to our Installed Capacity.  All of this electricity has been sold to CPFL Brasil.

32

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

CPFL Bio Formosa.  In 2009, CPFL Brasil established the Baia Formosa power plant (CPFL Bio Formosa), with an Installed Capacity of 40 MW.  The construction of CPFL Bio Formosa plant began in March 2010 and the plant began operations on September 2, 2011.  In 2006, our consulting group helped the Farias Group to sell approximately 11 MW in the A-5 auction (an auction held five years before the initial delivery date, see “Auctions on the Regulated Market”), with CCEARs in force until 2025.  The success of the auction helped CPFL Brasil to establish Usina Baia Formosa (currently CPFL Bio Formosa) in 2009.

CPFL Bio Buriti.  On March 23, 2010, CPFL Bio Buriti (which was formed to develop electric energy generation projects using sugar cane bagasse) executed a partnership agreement with Grupo Pedra Agroindustrial to develop new biomass generation projects.  The construction of CPFL Bio Buriti began in March 2010 and the plant began operations on October 7, 2011.  The Installed Capacity of this plant is 50 MW.  CPFL Bio Buriti has an associated PPA in force until 2030.

CPFL Bio Ipê.  On March 23, 2010, CPFL Bio Ipê (which was formed to develop electric energy generation projects using sugar cane bagasse) executed a partnership agreement with Grupo Pedra Agroindustrial to develop new biomass generation projects.  The construction of CPFL Bio Ipê began in December 2010 and the plant began operations on May 17, 2012.  The Installed Capacity of this plant is 25 MW. This project has an associated PPA in force until 2032.

CPFL Bio Pedra.  On March 23, 2010, CPFL Bio Pedra (which we formed to develop electric energy generation projects using sugar cane bagasse) executed a partnership agreement with Grupo Pedra Agroindustrial to develop new biomass generation projects.  Bio Pedra started operations on May 31, 2012 with an Installed Capacity 70 MW. The electricity from Bio Pedra has been sold through an auction held in 2010, with CCEARs in force until 2027.

CPFL Bio Ester. On March 9, 2012, through our subsidiary CPFL Energias Renováveis, we entered into an agreement to purchase 100% of the electric energy and water steam co-generation assets of SPE Lacenas Participações Ltda., a subsidiary of Usina Açucareira Ester (“Usina Ester”).  Usina Ester holds authorization from ANEEL to exploit electric energy from biomass (sugar cane), with Installed Capacity of 40.0 MW.  The acquisition was complete on October 18, 2012. CPFL Bio Ester has an associated PPA in force until 2025.

Solar Power Plant

Tanquinho.  Tanquinho solar power plant, in the state of São Paulo, started operations in November 27, 2012, with an Installed Capacity of 1.1 MWp.  We expect Tanquinho to generate approximately 1.6 GWh per year.

Wind Farms

Praia Formosa:  Praia Formosa wind farm, in the state of Ceará, began operations in August 26, 2009.  It has an Installed Capacity of 105 MW and an associated PPA in force until 2029.

Icaraizinho:  Icaraizinho wind farm, in the state of Ceará, began operations in October 14, 2009.  It has an Installed Capacity of 54.6 MW and an associated PPA in force until 2029.

Foz do Rio Choró:  Foz do Rio Choró wind farm, in the state of Ceará, began operations in January 31, 2009.  It has an Installed Capacity of 25.2 MW and an associated PPA in force until 2029.

Paracuru:  Paracuru wind farm, in the state of Ceará, began operations in November 29, 2008.  It has an Installed Capacity of 25.2 MW and an associated PPA in force until 2028.

Taíba Albatroz:  Taíba Albatroz wind farm, in the state of Ceará, has an Installed Capacity of 16.8 MW and an associated agreement with Eletrobras under the Proinfa Program to sell all of the energy generated for a period of 20 years.  The acquisition of Taíba Albatroz wind farm was concluded on June 19, 2012.

Bons Ventos:  Bons Ventos wind farm, in the state of Ceará, has an Installed Capacity of 50.4 MW and an associated agreement with Eletrobras under the Proinfa Program to sell all of the energy generated for a period of 20 years.  The acquisition of Bons Ventos wind farm was concluded on June 19, 2012. 

33

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Enacel:  Enacel wind farm, in the state of Ceará, has an Installed Capacity of 31.5 MW and an associated agreement with Eletrobras under the Proinfa Program to sell all of the energy generated for a period of 20 years.  The acquisition of Enacel wind farm was concluded on June 19, 2012.

Canoa Quebrada:  Canoa Quebrada wind farm, in the state of Ceará, has an Installed Capacity of 58.8 MW and an associated agreement with Eletrobras under the Proinfa Program to sell all of the energy generated for a period of 20 years.  The acquisition of Canoa Quebrada wind farm was concluded on June 19, 2012.

Santa Clara Complex:  Santa Clara Complex, in the state of Rio Grande do Norte, comprises seven wind farms with an Installed Capacity of 188 MW an associated CCEAR in force until 2032.  We have been receiving revenues deriving from the Santa Clara wind farms, as contracted through the “2009 Auction Reserve Energy” (Leilão de Energia de Reserva), since July 2012. Although the construction of the Transmission line is not yet completed, these wind farms are ready to start generating energy.

Expansion of Installed Capacity

Demand for electricity in our distribution concession areas continues to grow.  To address this increase in demand, and to improve our margins, we are expanding our Installed Capacity.  Through our subsidiary CPFL Energias Renováveis, we are building Alvorada and Coopcana co-generation plants, Campo dos Ventos II wind farm and the wind farms of the Macacos I, São Benedito, Atlântica and Campo dos Ventos complexes, which together will have an Installed Capacity of 582 MW (our share will be 367 MW).  By the end of 2016, we expect that the total generating capacity from these facilities will become fully operational.

The following table sets forth information regarding our current generation projects as of the date of this annual report:

 

Estimated Installed Capacity

Estimated Assured Energy

Start of Construction

Expected Start of Operations

Our Ownership

Estimated Installed Capacity Available

Estimated Assured Energy Available to us

Plants under development

(MW)

(GWh/yr)

 

 

(%)

 

(GWh/yr)

Thermoelectric biomass

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alvorada Thermoelectric plant

50

157.7

February 2012

2Q 2013

63.00

31

99.3

Coopcana Thermoelectric plant

50

157.7

February 2012

2Q 2013

63.00

31

99.3

Subtotal

100

315.4

 

 

 

62

198.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wind Farms

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Campo dos Ventos II Wind Farm (1)

30

131.4

2012

3Q 2013

63.00

19

82.8

Campo dos Ventos Wind Farms (3 companies) (2)

82

352.2

2012

3Q 2016

63.00

52

221.9

Macacos I Wind Farms (4 companies) (3) 

78

328.5

November 2010

3Q 2013

63.00

49

207.0

São Benedito Wind Farms (6 companies) (4)

172

779.6

2012

3Q 2016

63.00

108

491.2

Atlântica Wind Farms (4 companies) (5)

120

461.7

2012

3Q 2013

63,00

76

290.8

Subtotal

482

2,053.4

 

 

 

304

1,293.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

582

2,368.8

 

 

 

366

1,492.3

 

__________________

 (1)          Campo dos Ventos II

(2)           Campo dos Ventos I, III, V.

(3)           Macacos, Pedra Preta, Costa Branca and Juremas.

(4)           Ventos de São Benedito, Ventos de Santo Dimas, Santa Mônica, Santa Úrsula, São Domingos and Ventos de São Martinho.

(5)           Atlântica I, II, IV and V.

 

34

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Biomass Thermoelectric power plants

Project Alvorada.  The construction of CPFL Bio Alvorada began in 2012 in the city of Araporã, in the state of Minas Gerais, and operations are scheduled to start in the first half of 2013.  The Installed Capacity of CPFL Bio Alvorada is expected to be 50 MW and Assured Energy is 157.7 GWh.  This project has an associated PPA in force until 2032.

Project Coopcana.  The construction of CPFL Bio Coopcana began in 2012 in the city of São Carlos do Avaí, in the state of Paraná, and operations are scheduled to start in the first half of 2013.  The Installed Capacity of CPFL Bio Alvorada is expected to be 50 MW and Assured Energy is 157.7 MWh.  This project has an associated PPA in force until 2033.

Wind Farms

Project Campo dos Ventos II Wind Farm.  In 2010, CPFL Geração acquired Campo dos Ventos II wind farm.  Construction of Campo dos Ventos II in the cities of João Câmara and Parazinho, in the state of Rio Grande do Norte, is in progress.  Operations are scheduled to start in the second half of 2013.  This wind farm will have an Installed Capacity of 30 MW and Assured Energy of 131.4 GWh.  The electricity from Campo dos Ventos II has been sold through an auction held in 2010, with CCEARs in force until 2033.

Project Campo dos Ventos Wind Farms.  In 2010, CPFL Geração acquired Campo dos Ventos I, III, V wind farms.  The operations are scheduled to start in the second half of 2016.  They will have Installed Capacity of 82 MW and Assured Energy of 352.2 GWh.  This project has an associated PPA in force until 2033.

Project Macacos I Wind Farms.  The Macacos I complex is comprise of by Macacos, Pedra Preta, Costa Branca and Juremas wind farms, which will have an aggregate Installed Capacity of 78 MW and aggregate Assured Energy of 328.5 GWh.  The construction of these wind farms has already started and operations are scheduled to commence in the second half of 2013.  The electricity from these wind farms has been sold through an auction of alternative sources held in 2010, with CCEARs in force until 2032.

Project São Benedito Wind Farms.  The São Benedito complex is comprised of Ventos de São Benedito, Ventos de Santo Dimas, Santa Mônica, São Domingos, Ventos do São Martinho 6 and Santa Úrsula wind farms, which will have an aggregate Installed Capacity of 172 MW and aggregate Assured Energy of 779.6 GWh.  The operations are scheduled to start in the second half of 2016.  This project has an associated PPA in force until 2034.

Project Atlântica Wind Farms.  The Atlântica complex is comprised of Atlântica I, II, IV and V wind farms, which will have an aggregate Installed Capacity of 120 MW and aggregate Assured Energy of 461.7 GWh.  Operations are scheduled to start in the second half of 2013.  The electricity from these wind farms has been sold through an auction of alternative sources held in 2010, with CCEARs in force until 2033.

Electricity Commercialization and Services

Commercialization Operations

Our subsidiary CPFL Brasil carries out our electricity commercialization operations.  Its key functions are:

·         procuring electricity for commercialization activities by entering into bilateral contracts with energy companies (including our generation subsidiaries and third parties) and purchasing electricity in public auctions;

·         reselling electricity to Free Consumers;

·         reselling electricity to distribution companies (including CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga and RGE) and other agents in the electricity market through bilateral contracts;


6 Please note that São Domingos and Ventos de São Martinho Wind farms, which we mentioned in our 2011 annual report as part of Campo dos Ventos Compex, have been allocated to the São Benedito complex to better exploit synergies among the wind farms.

35

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

·         providing agency services to Free Consumers and Power Generators before the CCEE and other agents, such as guidance on their operational requirements.

The rates at which CPFL Brasil purchases and sells electricity in the Free Market are determined by bilateral negotiations with its suppliers and consumers.  The contracts with distribution companies are regulated by ANEEL.  In addition to marketing electricity to unaffiliated parties, CPFL Brasil resells electricity to CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga and RGE, but profit margins from sales to related parties have been limited by ANEEL regulations.  The ability to sell electricity to affiliated companies has been eliminated under the New Industry Model Law, with the exception of those contracts approved by ANEEL prior to March 2004.  However, we are allowed to sell electricity to distributors through the open bidding process in the Regulated Market.

Services

Through CPFL Serviços, we offer our consumers a wide range of electricity-related services.  These services are designed to help consumers improve the efficiency, cost and reliability of the electric equipment they use.  Our main electricity-related services include:

·         Transmission networks:  CPFL Serviços plans, constructs, commissions and provides electricity to Substations and Transmission lines, always in line with each consumer’s needs and growth expectations and in accordance with the most rigorous safety criteria, aiming for an optimal use of resources.

·         Distribution networks:  CPFL Serviços plans and constructs all electric energy distribution system network, including above and underground electricity grids, medium-voltage sub-stations and transformers, industrial plants and lighting solutions.  Our experience in the market and familiarity with norms in different regions of Brazil allow us to respect the relevant standards in all parts of the country.  As a result, we are able to bring quality and technologically-advanced energy to our consumption points.

·         Electric network maintenance:  CPFL Serviços offers  maintenance services on medium- and high-voltage networks on one-time or periodic basis with rapid diagnosis and precise service.  We also perform remodels on our sub-stations, maintenance services on generating units and work on live-wire networks.

·         Self-production networks:  The self-production networks offered by CPFL Serviços are made up of electric energy production alternatives.  They ensure supply of energy to consumers, diversify inputs and reduce costs.  We have generators (diesel and natural gas) that operate only in peak periods, which reduce electricity costs of our customers.  Our co-generation activities (natural gas) include the simultaneous and sequential production of electric and thermoelectric energy using a single kind of fuel.  We also offer solutions in acclimatization and energy-efficiency projects, as well as distributed generation of solar energy.

·         Equipment recovery:  CPFL Serviços has experience refurbishing electric assets in any state in order to restore their efficiency.  Our familiarity with refurbishing equipment also allows us to produce distribution and high-power transformers.  In addition, we self-produce and fabricate measurement panels, as well as panels for protection and command networks.

·         CPFL Atende: CPFL Atende is a contact center and customer relationship company, created to provide services both for the companies within our group and for other companies. Among these services are face-to-face attendance, back office, credit recovery, toll free customer support, ombudsman, service desk and sales.

·         CPFL Total: CPFL Total is a gathering and onlending company and has an authorized network that offers services as receiving water, electric power, telephone, bank, cable TV bills. It's also possible to issue second electric power invoices, changing billing preferences and prepaid cellphones cards. For the Business Customers, CPFL Total provides the "Serviço em Conta", that enable to charge products and services in the electric power invoices.

36

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

·         CPFL Nect: CPFL Nect is a company created to provide nature transactional administrative services such as human resources, purchasing and logistics of materials, maintenance and operation of IT systems and administrative infrastructure for the companies within our group. Aims to standardize processes and productivity gains.

Competition

We face competition from other generation and commercialization companies in the sale of electricity to Free Consumers.  Distribution and Transmission companies are required to permit the use of their lines and ancillary facilities for the distribution and Transmission of electricity by other parties upon payment of a tariff.

Brazilian law and our concession agreements provide that all of our distribution and hydroelectric concessions or authorizations can be renewed once with approval from the MME or ANEEL as the granting authority, provided that the concessionaire so requests and that certain requirements related to the rendering of public services or hydropower exploitation are met.  We intend to apply for the extension of each concession upon its expiration.  We may face significant competition from third parties in bidding for renewal of such concessions or for any new concessions.  The Federal Government has absolute discretion over whether to renew existing concessions, and the acquisition of certain concessions by competing investors could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our Concessions and Authorizations

Hydroelectric generation projects with a capacity greater than 1,000 kW operated by an Independent Power Producer can usually only be implemented through concessions granted by ANEEL through public biddings (and the execution of a concession agreement).  Requests to renew these concessions are examined by ANEEL on a case‑by‑case basis, according to the terms of the related agreement and public bidding note.  However, ANEEL retains the power to deny the request to extend the concession period.

Certain projects such as wind farms, small scale Hydroelectric Power Plants and Thermoelectric Power Plants are implemented through an authorization awarded by the granting authority without the need for a public bidding process (unlike concessions).  Renewal of these authorizations is also at the discretion of ANEEL and is decided on a case-by-case basis.  ANEEL must provide justification for its decisions and any renewal must foster the public interest.

For further information about concessions and authorizations, see “The Brazilian Power Industry – Concessions.”

Concessions

We operate under concessions granted by the Brazilian government through ANEEL for our generation and distribution businesses.  We have the following concessions with respect to our distribution business:

Concession no.

Concessionaire

State

Term

014/1997

CPFL Paulista

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

09/2002

CPFL Piratininga

São Paulo

30 years from October 1998

013/1997

RGE

Rio Grande do Sul

30 years from November 1997

021/1999

CPFL Santa Cruz

São Paulo and Paraná

16 years (from February 1999 to July 2015)

015/1999

CPFL Jaguari

São Paulo

16 years (from February 1999 to July 2015)

017/1999

CPFL Mococa

São Paulo and Minas Gerais

16 years (from February 1999 to July 2015)

018/1999

CPFL Leste Paulista

São Paulo

16 years (from February 1999 to July 2015)

019/1999

CPFL Sul Paulista

São Paulo

16 years (from February 1999 to July 2015)

 

37

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

The table below summarizes the concessions relative to our generation business.  In addition to these concessions, CPFL Sul Centrais, as an Independent Power Producer with generating capacity of less than 1,000 kW, operates under a regulatory authorization rather than a concession agreement.

Concession no.

Independent Power Producers / Concessionaire

Plant

State

Term

Maximum renewal period

128/2001

Foz do Chapecó

Foz do Chapecó

Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul

35 years from November 2001

At the discretion of ANEEL

036/2001

Barra Grande

Barra Grande

Rio Grande do Sul

35 years from May 2001

At the discretion of ANEEL

008/2001

CERAN

14 de Julho, Castro Alves and Monte Claro

Rio Grande do Sul

35 years from March 2001

At the discretion of ANEEL

043/2000

ENERCAN

Campos Novos

Santa Catarina

35 years from May 2000

At the discretion of ANEEL

005/1997

Investco

Luiz Eduardo Magalhães

Tocantins

35 years from December 1997

At the discretion of ANEEL

015/1997

CPFL Geração

UTE Carioba

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

30 years

Decree No. 85,983/81

CPFL Geração

Serra da Mesa

Goiás

(1)

20 years

015/1997

CPFL Geração

Cariobinha (Small Hydroelectric Power Plant)

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

30 years

015/1997

CPFL Geração

Salto do Pinhal (micro Hydroelectric Power Plant)

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

30 years

015/1997

CPFL Geração

Ponte do Silva (micro Hydroelectric Power Plant)

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

30 years

015/1999

CPFL Jaguari

Macaco Branco (Small Hydroelectric Power Plant)

São Paulo

30 years (from December 2012)

(2)

018/1999

CPFL Leste Paulista

Rio do Peixe I and II (Small Hydroelectric Power Plants)

São Paulo

30 years (from December 2012)

(2)

(3)

CPFL Leste Paulista

Santa Alice (micro Hydroelectric Power Plant)

São Paulo

(3)

-

(3)

CPFL Sul Paulista

Lavrinha (micro Hydroelectric Power Plant)

São Paulo

(3)

-

(3)

CPFL Sul Paulista

São José (micro Hydroelectric Power Plant)

São Paulo

(3)

-

(3)

CPFL Sul Paulista

Turvinho (micro Hydroelectric Power Plant)

São Paulo

(3)

-

(3)

CPFL Mococa

Pinheirinho (micro Hydroelectric Power Plant)

São Paulo

(3)

-

(3)

CPFL Mococa

São Sebastião (micro Hydroelectric Power Plant)

São Paulo

(3)

-

015/1997

CPFL Renováveis

Americana

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

20 years

015/1997

CPFL Renováveis

Andorinhas  

São Paulo

(3)

(3)

015/1997

CPFL Renováveis

Buritis

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

20 years

015/1997

CPFL Renováveis

Capão Preto

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

20 years

015/1997

CPFL Renováveis

Chibarro

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

20 years

015/1997

CPFL Renováveis

Dourados

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

20 years

015/1997

CPFL Renováveis

Eloy Chaves

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

20 years

015/1997

CPFL Renováveis

Esmeril

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

20 years

015/1997

CPFL Renováveis

Gavião Peixoto

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

20 years

 

38

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Concession no.

Independent Power Producers / Concessionaire

Plant

State

Term

Maximum renewal period

015/1997

CPFL Renováveis

Guaporé

São Paulo

(3)

(3)

015/1997

CPFL Renováveis

Jaguari

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

20 years

015/1997

CPFL Renováveis

Lençóis

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

20 years

015/1997

CPFL Renováveis

Monjolinho

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

20 years

015/1997

CPFL Renováveis

Pinhal

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

20 years

015/1997

CPFL Renováveis

Pirapó  

São Paulo

(3)

(3)

015/1997

CPFL Renováveis

Saltinho

São Paulo

(3)

(3)

015/1997

CPFL Renováveis

Salto Grande

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

20 years

015/1997

CPFL Renováveis

Socorro  

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

20 years

015/1997

CPFL Renováveis

Santana  

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

20 years

015/1997

CPFL Renováveis

Três Saltos

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

20 years

015/1997

CPFL Renováveis

São Joaquim

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

20 years

Ordinance No. 475

CPFL Renováveis

Diamante

São Paulo

30 years from November 1997

30 years

 

__________________

(1)     We have the contractual right to 51.54% of the Assured Energy of this facility under a 30-year rental agreement, expiring in 2028.  The concession for Serra da Mesa is held by Furnas and it was recently extended to November 12, 2039.  On April 27, 2012, the MME published Ordinance No. 262, which approved the renewal of the concession for Serra da Mesa.

(2)     Hydroelectric projects with an Installed Capacity higher than 1,000 kW that were granted through a concession process with the regulatory authority and the administrator of power concessions.

(3)     Hydroelectric projects with an Installed Capacity equal to or less than 1,000 kW that are registered with the regulatory authority and the administrator of power concessions, but do not require concession or authorization processes for operating.

Law No. 12,783, of January 11, 2013, defined the conditions for the renewal of generation, Transmission and distribution concessions that have been obtained under the conditions specified in articles 17, 19 or 22 of Law No. 9,074 of July, 7, 1995.  These concessions may be extended once at the discretion of the Federal Government, for a period of up to 30 years in order to ensure the continuity and efficiency of the services rendered and low tariffs.  Law No. 12,783/13 provided that renewals that would take place in 2015, 2016 or 2017 could be anticipated to 2012. On December 4, 2012, we had the concessions of the Rio do Peixe I and II and Macaco Branco Small Hydroelectrical Power Plants renewed for an indefinite period.  Rio do Peixe I and II belong to our distribution subsidiary CPFL Leste Paulista, and Macaco Branco belongs to CPFL Jaguari.

The renewal of the concessions of Rio do Peixe I and II and Macaco Branco are subject to other conditions, as follows: (i) the energy generated shall be sold to all distribution companies in Brazil according to quotas defined by ANEEL (previously, energy was sold only to the respective distribution subsidiary); (ii) the concessionaire’s annual revenue shall be defined by ANEEL, subject to tariff reviews (previously, the energy prices were defined contractually and adjusted according to the IPCA); and (iii) the assets that had not yet been amortized should be indemnified, which indemnization would not be considered as annual revenue. The remuneration relating to new assets or existing assets that have not been indemnified would be considered as annual revenue.  Rio do Peixe I e II had their assets indemnified at R$34.4 million.  Macaco Branco had its assets fully amortized, and had no right to indemnization.

Additionally, Resolution No. 521 of December 11, 2012 established that the generation concessions that were renewed under the conditions of Law No. 12,783/13 should no longer belong to distribution companies, which should transfer the generation concessions to non-distribution companies within six months from the date of renewal.  The concessions of Rio do Peixe I and II and Macaco Branco will remain linked to CPFL Leste Paulista and CPFL Jaguari up until June 2013, when we will transfer them to a non-distribution subsidiary.    

In connection with our distribution subsidiaries CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Jaguari, CPFL Mococa, CPFL Leste Paulista and CPFL Sul Paulista, see “Item 3.  Risk Factors—We are uncertain as to the renewal of our concessions.”

 

39

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Authorizations

Authorization no.

Independent Power Producers / Concessionaire

Plant

State

Term

Maximum renewal period

2106/2009

CPFL Bioenergia

Baldin Thermoelectric Power Plant

São Paulo

30 years from September 24, 2009

At the discretion of the granting authority

2277/2010

EPASA

Termoparaíba Thermoelectric Power Plant

Paraíba

35 years from December 7, 2007

At the discretion of MME

2277/2010

EPASA

Termonordeste Thermoelectric Power Plant

Paraíba

35 years from December 12, 2007

At the discretion of MME

259/2002

CPFL Bio Formosa S.A.

Baía Formosa Thermoelectric Power Plant

Rio Grande do Norte

30 years from May 15, 2002

At the discretion of the granting authority

2643/2010

CPFL Bio Buriti S.A.

Buriti Thermoelectric Power Plant

São Paulo

30 years from December 16, 2010

At the discretion of the granting authority

2375/2010

CPFL Bio Ipê S.A.

Ipê Thermoelectric Power Plant

São Paulo

30 years from May 3, 2010

At the discretion of the granting authority

129/2010

CPFL Bio Pedra S.A.

Pedra Thermoelectric Power Plant

São Paulo

35 years from February 28, 2010

At the discretion of the granting authority

609/2010

Santa Clara I Energia Renováveis Ltda.

Santa Clara I

Rio Grande do Norte

35 years from July 02, 2010

At the discretion of the granting authority

683/2010

Santa Clara II Energia Renováveis Ltda.

Santa Clara II

Rio Grande do Norte

35 years from August 05, 2010

At the discretion of the granting authority

610/2010

Santa Clara III Energia Renováveis Ltda.

Santa Clara III

Rio Grande do Norte

35 years from July 02, 2010

At the discretion of the granting authority

672/2010

Santa Clara IV Energia Renováveis Ltda.

Santa Clara IV

Rio Grande do Norte

35 years from July 30, 2010

At the discretion of the granting authority

838/2010

Santa Clara V Energia Renováveis Ltda.

Santa Clara V

Rio Grande do Norte

35 years from October 11, 2010

At the discretion of the granting authority

670/2010

Santa Clara VI Energia Renováveis Ltda.

Santa Clara VI

Rio Grande do Norte

35 years from July 30, 2010

At the discretion of the granting authority

749/2010

Eurus VI Energias Renováveis Ltda.

Eurus VI

Rio Grande do Norte

35 years from August 25, 2010

At the discretion of the granting authority

Resolution No. 606

SPE Arvoredo Energia S.A.

Arvoredo

Santa Catarina

30 years from November 7, 2002

At the discretion of the granting authority

Resolution No.  587

SPE Alto Irani Energia S.A.

Alto Irani

Santa Catarina

30 years from October, 30, 2002

At the discretion of the granting authority

Resolution No.  607

SPE Plano Alto Energia S.A.

Plano Alto

Santa Catarina

30 years from November 7, 2002

At the discretion of the granting authority

Resolution No.  348

SPE Barra da Paciência Energia S.A.

Barra da Paciência

Minas Gerais

30 years from December 20, 1999

At the discretion of the granting authority

Resolution No.  349

SPE Cocais Grande Energia S.A.

Cocais Grande

Minas Gerais

30 years from December 23, 1999

At the discretion of the granting authority

Resolution No.  17

SPE Corrente Grande Energia S.A.

Corrente Grande

Minas Gerais

30 years from January, 17, 2000

At the discretion of the granting authority

Resolution No.  370

SPE Ninho da Águia Energia S.A.

Ninho da Águia

Minas Gerais

30 years from December 30, 1999

At the discretion of the granting authority

Resolution No.  406

SPE Paiol Energia S.A.

Paiol

Minas Gerais

30 years from August 07, 2002

At the discretion of the granting authority

Resolution No.  13

SPE São Gonçalo Energia S.A.

São Gonçalo

Minas Gerais

30 years from January, 14, 2000

At the discretion of the granting authority

Resolution No.  355

SPE Varginha Energia S.A.

Varginha

Minas Gerais

30 years from December 23, 1999

At the discretion of the granting authority

Resolution No.  367

SPE Várzea Alegre Energia S.A.

Várzea Alegre

Minas Gerais

30 years from December 30, 1999

At the discretion of the granting authority

Ordinance No. 352

SPE Santa Luzia Energética S.A.

Santa Luzia

Santa Catarina

35 years from December 21, 2007

At the discretion of the granting authority

Resolution No. 307

Eólica Formosa Geração e Comercialização de Energia S.A.

Praia Formosa

Ceará

30 years from June 05, 2002

At the discretion of the granting authority

Resolution No. 454

Eólica Icaraizinho Geração e Comercialização de Energia S.A.

Icaraizinho

Ceará

30 years from August 28, 2002

At the discretion of the granting authority

Resolution No. 306

SIIF Cinco Geração e Comercialização de Energia S.A.

Choró

Ceará

30 years from June 05, 2002

At the discretion of the granting authority

Resolution No. 460

Eólica Paracuru Geração e Comercialização de Energia S.A.

Paracuru

Ceará

30 years from August 28, 2002

At the discretion of the granting authority

Ordinance No. 564/11

Pedra Preta Energia S.A.

Pedra Preta

Rio Grande do Norte

35 years from October 14, 2011

At the discretion of the granting authority

Ordinance No. 557/11

Macacos Energia S.A.

Macacos

Rio Grande do Norte

35 years from September 29, 2011

At the discretion of the granting authority

Ordinance No. 556/11

Juremas Energia S.A.

Juremas

Rio Grande do Norte

35 years from September 29, 2011

At the discretion of the granting authority

Ordinance No. 585/11

Costa Branca Energia S.A.

Costa Branca

Rio Grande do Norte

35 years from October 14, 2011

At the discretion of the granting authority

Ordinance No. 134

Atlântica I Parque Eólico S.A.

Atlântica I

Rio Grande do Sul

35 years from February 28, 2011

At the discretion of the granting authority

Ordinance No. 148

Atlântica II Parque Eólico S.A.

Atlântica II

Rio Grande do Sul

35 years from March 04, 2011

At the discretion of the granting authority

Ordinance No. 147

Atlântica IV Parque Eólico S.A.

Atlântica IV

Rio Grande do Sul

35 years from March 04, 2011

At the discretion of the granting authority

Ordinance No. 148

Atlântica V Parque Eólico S.A.

Atlântica V

Rio Grande do Sul

35 years from March 22, 2011

At the discretion of the granting authority

Ordinance No. 625

Bons Ventos Geradora de Energia S.A.

Enacel

Ceará

30 years from November 13, 2002

At the discretion of the granting authority

Ordinance No. 680

Bons Ventos Geradora de Energia S.A.

Canoa Quebrada

Ceará

30 years from December 11, 2002

At the discretion of the granting authority

Ordinance No. 778

Bons Ventos Geradora de Energia S.A.

Taíba Albatroz

Ceará

30 years from December 24, 2002

At the discretion of the granting authority

Ordinance No. 093

Bons Ventos Geradora de Energia S.A.

Bons Ventos

Ceará

30 years from March 10, 2003

At the discretion of the granting authority

Ordinance No. 257

Campo dos Ventos II Energias Renováveis S.A.

Campo dos Ventos II

Rio Grande do Norte

35 years from April 18, 2011

At the discretion of the granting authority

Ordinance No. 3714

SPE Bio Alvorada S.A.

Bio Alvorada Thermoelectric Power Plant

Minas Gerais

30 years from October 29,2012

At the discretion of the granting authority

Ordinance No. 3328

SPE Bio Coopcana S.A.

Bio Coopcana Thermoelectric Power Plant

Paraná

30 years from February 14, 2012

At the discretion of the granting authority

Ordinance No. 3510

SPE Salto Góes Energia S.A.

Salto Góes

Santa Catarina

30 years from August 19, 2010

At the discretion of the granting authority

 

40

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

Independent Power Producers

A generation company classified as an Independent Power Producer under Brazilian law receives a concession or authorization to produce energy for its own consumption or for sale to local distribution companies, Free Consumers, and other types of consumers.  The price to be charged by Independent Power Producers for the sale of energy to certain types of consumer is subject to general criteria established by ANEEL, whereas the sale price to others can be freely negotiated between the parties.

Concessionaires

A company classified as a concessionaire under Brazilian law receives a concession to distribute, transmit or generate electric energy.  Since concessions usually involve public services or assets, they can only be granted through a public bidding procedure (licitação pública).  Most of the tariffs charged by concessionaires of public services are determined by ANEEL. Concessionaires are not free to negotiate these rates with consumers, except for (i) generation concessionaires, which are free to establish those rates and (ii) distribution concessionaires that may grant discounts to consumers (as long as equal treatment is granted to other consumers within the same category).

The concession agreement and related documents establish the concession period and whether the related concession can be extended.  For concessions to generate electric energy, the amortization period for the related investment is 35 years, renewable once for a maximum period of 20 years.

Although concession agreements and applicable laws generally allow for the extension of the concession period, such extension is not a right.  The decision to extend a concession agreement is subject to the discretion of the granting authority, which must provide justification for its decision, and the decision must foster the public interest.

Properties

Our principal properties consist of hydroelectric generation plants.  Due to the adoption of IFRS, we have reclassified our distribution companies’ fixed assets, comprised mainly of Substations and Distribution Networks, partially as intangible assets and partially as financial assets of concession.  The net book value of our total property, plant and equipment as of December 31, 2012 was R$9,535 million.  No single one of our properties produces more than 10.0% of our total revenues.  Our facilities are generally adequate for our present needs and suitable for their intended purposes.

Pursuant to Brazilian law, the essential properties and facilities that we use in performing our obligations under our concession agreements cannot be transferred, assigned, pledged or sold to, or encumbered by, any of our creditors without prior approval from ANEEL.

Environmental

The Brazilian constitution gives both the Brazilian Federal and State Governments the power to enact laws designed to protect the environment.  A similar power is given to municipalities whose local interests may be affected.  Municipal laws are considered to be a supplement to federal and state laws.  A violator of applicable environmental laws may be subject to administrative and criminal sanctions, and will have an obligation to remediate and/or provide compensation for environmental damages.  Administrative sanctions may include substantial fines and suspension of activities, while criminal sanctions may include fines and, for individuals (including executive officers and employees of companies who commit environmental crimes), imprisonment.

Our energy distribution and generation facilities are subject to environmental licensing procedures, which include the preparation of environmental impact assessments before such facilities are constructed.  Once the respective environmental licenses are obtained, the holder of the license remains subject to compliance with specific requirements.

41

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

The environmental issues regarding the construction of new electricity generation facilities require specially-tailored oversight.  For this reason, CPFL Geração manages these matters in order to ensure that its policies and environmental obligations are given adequate consideration.  Decisions are made by environmental committees, whose members include representatives of each project partner and of each plant’s environmental management office.  Our environmental committees are constantly interacting with government agencies to ensure environmental compliance and future electricity generation.  In addition, we support local community programs that relocate rural families in collective resettlements and provide institutional support for families involved in the conservation of local biodiversity.

In order to facilitate compliance with environmental laws, we use an environmental management system compliant with ISO 14001 that has been implemented in all of our segments.  We have established a system to identify, evaluate and update matters relating to applicable environmental laws, as well as other requirements applicable to our environmental management system.  Our generation and distribution of electricity is subject to internal and external audits that verify whether our activities are in compliance with ISO 14001.  Our environmental management processes take into consideration our budgets and realistic forecasts, and always aim to achieve improvements at the financial, social and environmental levels.

The Brazilian Power Industry

According to the ANEEL, as of December 31, 2012, the installed capacity of power generation in Brazil was 121,104 MW.  Historically, approximately 70% of the total installed capacity in Brazil has derived from hydropower generation facilities. 

In September 2012, the MME and the EPE submitted a new ten year expansion plan for approval at a public hearing, under which Brazil’s installed power generation capacity will reach 182.4 GW by 2021, of which 116.8 GW (64.1%) is projected to be hydroelectric, 29.5 GW (16.1%) is projected to be thermoelectric and nuclear and 36.1 GW (19.8%) is projected to be from renewable sources.

Currently, approximately 32% of the installed capacity in Brazil is owned by Eletrobras, a joint capital and publicly traded company controlled by the Federal Government.  We are the second largest private player within the electricity generation sector, with 2.4% of the market share. 

According to the EPE, electricity consumption in Brazil grew by 3.5% in 2012, reaching 448.3 TWh.  The MME and the EPE estimate that electricity consumption will grow by 4.2% per year until 2021, following the growth trend in GDP, industrial production, population, among other variables. The distribution segment in Brazil is still fragmented with six companies controlling approximatey 50% of the market.  We are the largest player within the electricity distribution sector, with 13% of the market share.

Large hydroelectric power plants tend to distance from the consumption centers, which requires construction of large Transmission lines in high and extra-high voltage (230 kV to 750 kV) that often cross the territory of several states.  Brazil has a robust electric grid system, with more than 100,000 km of Transmission lines with voltage equal to or greater than 230 kV and processing capacity of approximately 265,000 MVA from the state of Rio Grande do Sul through the state of Pará.

Principal Regulatory Authorities

Ministry of Mines and Energy — MME

The MME is the Brazilian government’s primary authority the power industry.  Following the adoption of the New Industry Model Law (in 2004), the Brazilian government, acting primarily through the MME, has assumed certain duties that were previously the responsibility of ANEEL, including drafting guidelines for the granting of concessions and issuing directives governing the bidding process for concessions that relate to public services and public assets.

 

42

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

National Energy Policy Council — CNPE

The National Energy Policy Council, Conselho Nacional de Política Energética (“CNPE”), a committee created in August 1997, advises the President of Brazil on the development of national energy policy.  The CNPE is chaired by the Minister of Mines and Energy and consists of eight government ministers, three members selected by the President of Brazil, another representative of the MME and the president of the EPE.  The CNPE was created to optimize the use of Brazil’s energy resources and to guarantee national energy supply.

Brazilian Electricity Regulatory Agency - ANEEL

ANEEL is an independent federal regulatory agency whose primary responsibility is to regulate and supervise the power industry in accordance with policies set forth by the MME, together with other matters delegated to it by the Brazilian government and the MME.  ANEEL’s current responsibilities include, among others, (i) administering concessions for electric energy generation, Transmission and distribution, including the approval of electricity tariffs, (ii) enacting regulations for the electric energy industry, (iii) implementing and regulating the exploitation of energy sources, including the use of hydroelectric power, (iv) promoting the public bidding process for new concessions, (v) settling administrative disputes among electricity generation entities and electricity purchasers and (vi) defining the criteria and methodology for the determination of Transmission tariffs.

National Electrical System Operator — ONS

The ONS is a non‑profit organization that coordinates and controls the production and Transmission of energy by electric utilities engaged in the generation, Transmission and distribution.  The primary role of the ONS is to oversee generation and Transmission operations in the Interconnected Power System; subject to regulation and supervision by ANEEL.  The ONS’ objectives and principal responsibilities include:  operational planning for the generation industry, organizing the use of the domestic national grid and international interconnections, guaranteeing that all parties in the industry have access to the Transmission network in a non‑discriminatory manner, assisting in the expansion of the electric energy system, proposing plans to the MME for extensions of the Basic Network, and submitting rules for the operation of the Transmission system for ANEEL’s approval.

Electric Energy Trading Chamber — CCEE

The Electric Energy Trading Chamber, Câmara de Comercialização de Energia Elétrica (“CCEE”), is a nonprofit organization that is subject to authorization, inspection and regulation by ANEEL.  The CCEE replaced the Wholesale Energy Market, or MAE.

The CCEE is responsible, among other things, for (i) registering all the energy purchase agreements in the Regulated Market, Contratos de Comercialização de Energia no Ambiente Regulado (“CCEAR”), and registering agreements that result from market adjustments and the volume of electricity contracted in the Free Market, and (ii) accounting for and clearing of short‑term transactions.  The CCEE consists of holders of concessions, permissions and authorized entities within the electricity industry, and Free and Special Consumers.  Its board of directors is composed of four members appointed by these parties, together with one appointed by the MME.  The MME also acts as chairman of the board of directors.

Energy Research Company — EPE

On August 16, 2004 the Brazilian government created the Energy Research Company, Empresa de Pesquisa Energética (“EPE”), a state-owned company responsible for conducting strategic research on the energy industry, including with respect to electric energy, oil, gas, coal and renewable energy sources.  The research carried out by EPE is used by MME in its policymaking role in the energy industry.

Energy Industry Monitoring Committee — CMSE

The New Industry Model Law created the Energy Industry Monitoring Committee, Comitê de Monitoramento do Setor Elétrico (“CMSE”), which acts under the direction of the MME.  The CMSE is responsible for monitoring supply conditions within the system and for indicating steps to be taken to correct problems.

 

43

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Concessions, Permissions and Authorizations

The Brazilian constitution provides that the development, use and sale of electric energy may be undertaken directly by the Brazilian government or indirectly through the granting of concessions, permissions or authorizations.  Historically, the Brazilian electric energy industry has been dominated by generation, Transmission and distribution concessionaires controlled by the Federal or State governments.

Companies or consortia that wish to build or operate facilities for generation, Transmission or distribution of electricity in Brazil must apply to the MME or to ANEEL, as representatives of the Brazilian government, for a concession, permission or authorization, as the case may be.

Concessions

Concessions grant rights to generate, transmit or distribute electricity in the relevant concession area for a specified period (as opposed to permissions and authorizations, which may be revoked at any time at the discretion of the MME, in consultation with ANEEL).  This period is usually 35 years for new generation concessions, and 30 years for new Transmission or distribution concessions.  An existing concession may be renewed at the granting authority’s discretion. 

The Concession Law establishes, among other things, the conditions that the concessionaire must comply with when providing electricity services, the rights of consumers, and the obligations of the concessionaire and the granting authority.  Furthermore, the concessionaire must comply with regulations governing the electricity sector.  The main provisions of the Concession Law are summarized below:

Adequate service.  The concessionaire must render adequate service with respect to regularity, continuity, efficiency, safety and accessibility.

Use of land.  The concessionaire may use public land or request the granting authority to expropriate necessary private land for the benefit of the concessionaire.  In such case, the concessionaire shall compensate the affected private landowners.

Strict liability.  The concessionaire is strictly liable for all damages arising from the provision of its services.

Changes in controlling interest.  The granting authority must approve any direct or indirect change in controlling interests in the concessionaire.

Intervention by the granting authority.  As per Law No. 12,767, of December 27, 2012, the granting authority may intervene in the concession, acting through ANEEL, to ensure the adequate performance of services, as well as full compliance with applicable contractual and regulatory provisions.  Within 30 days after the date of the decree, ANEEL is required to commence an administrative proceeding in which the concessionaire is entitled to contest the intervention.  During the term of the administrative proceeding, a government appointed manager becomes responsible for carrying on the concession.  The administrative proceeding must be completed within one year (which may be extended for two more years).  In order for the intervention to cease and the concession to return to the concessionaire, the concessionaire’s shareholders are required to present a detailed recovering plan to ANEEL and correct the irregularities identified by ANEEL.

Termination of the concession.  The termination of the concession agreement may be accelerated by means of expropriation and/or forfeiture.  Expropriation is the early termination of a concession for reasons related to the public interest that must be expressly declared by law.  Forfeiture must be declared by the granting authority after ANEEL or the MME has made a final administrative ruling that the concessionaire, among other things, (i) has failed to render adequate service or to comply with applicable law or regulation, (ii) no longer has the technical, financial or economic capacity to provide adequate service, or (iii) has not complied with penalties assessed by the granting authority.  The concessionaire may contest any expropriation or forfeiture in the courts.  The concessionaire is entitled to indemnification for its investments in expropriated assets that have not been fully amortized or depreciated, after deduction of any fines and damages due by the concessionaire.

44

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Expiration.  When the concession expires, all assets, rights and privileges that are materially related to the rendering of the electricity services revert to the Brazilian government.  Following the expiration, the concessionaire is entitled to indemnification for its investments in assets that have not been fully amortized or depreciated as of the expiration.

Penalties.  ANEEL regulations govern the imposition of sanctions against the participants in the electricity sector and classify the appropriate penalties based on the nature and importance of the breach (including warnings, fines and forfeiture).  For each breach, the fines can be up to two per cent of the revenue (net of value-added tax and services tax) of the concessionaire in the 12-month period preceding any assessment notice.  Infractions that may result in fines relate to the failure of the agent to request ANEEL’s approval in the following cases among others:  (i) execution of contracts between related parties in the cases provided by regulation; (ii) sale or assignment of the assets related to services rendered as well as the imposition of any encumbrance (including any security, bond, guarantee, pledge and mortgage) on them or any other assets related to the concession or the revenues of the electricity services; and (iii) changes in controlling interests of the holder of the concession.  In cases of contracts executed between related parties that are submitted for ANEEL’s approval, ANEEL may seek to impose restrictions on the terms and conditions of these contracts and, in extreme circumstances, determine that the contract be rescinded.

Permissions

Permissions has a very limited use within  the  Brazilian electric sector.  Permissions are granted to rural power generation cooperatives, which supply power to their members and occasionally to consumers that are not part of the cooperative, in  areas not regularly  served  by  large  distributors.  Permissions represent an irrelevant share in the Brazilian power matrix.

Authorizations

Authorizations are unilateral and discretionary acts carried out by the granting authority.  Unlike concessions, authorizations generally do not require a public bidding process.  As an exception to the general rule, authorizations may also be granted to potential power producers after specific bidding processes for the purchase of power conducted by ANEEL.

In the power generation sector, Independent Power Producers and self-generators hold an authorization as opposed to a concession.  Independent Power Producers and self-generators do not receive public service concessions or permits to render public services.  Rather, they are granted authorizations or specific concessions to explore water resources that merely allow them to produce, use or sell electric energy.  Each authorization granted to an Independent Power Producer or self-power producer sets forth the rights and duties of the authorized company.  Authorized companies have the right to ask ANEEL to carry out expropriations on their benefit, are subject to ANEEL supervision and are subject to ANEEL’s prior approval in the event of a change in their controlling interests.  Moreover, early unilateral termination of the authorization entitles the authorized company to seek compensation from the granting authority for damages suffered.

An Independent Power Producer may sell part or all of its output to customers on its own account and at its own and risk.  A self‑generator may, upon specific authorization by ANEEL, sell or trade any exceeding energy it is unable to consume.  Independent Power Producers and self‑generators are not granted monopoly rights and are not subject to price controls, with the exception of specific cases.  Independent Power Producers compete with public utilities and among themselves for large customers, pools of customers of distribution companies or any customers not served by a public utility.

The New Industry Model Law

Since 1995, the Federal Government has taken a number of measures to reform the Brazilian electric energy industry.  These culminated, on March 15, 2004, in the enactment of the New Industry Model Law, which further restructured the power industry with the ultimate goal of providing consumers with a secure electricity supply at an adequate tariff.

45

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

The New Industry Model Law introduced material changes to the regulation of the power industry, with a view to (i) providing incentives to private and public entities to build and maintain generation capacity and (ii) assuring the supply of electricity within Brazil at adequate tariffs through competitive electricity public bidding processes.  The key features of the New Industry Model Law include:

·         Creation of two “environments” for the trading of electricity, including:  (1) the Regulated Market, a more stable market in terms of supply of electricity; and (2) a market specifically addressed to certain participants (i.e., Free Consumers and commercialization companies), called the Free Market, that permits a certain degree of competition.

·         Restrictions on certain activities of distributors, so as to require them to focus on their core business of distribution, to promote more efficient and reliable services to captive consumers.

·         Elimination of self-dealing, in order to provide an incentive to distributors to purchase electricity at the lowest available prices rather than buying electricity from related parties.

·         Maintenance of contracts entered into prior to the New Industry Model Law, in order to provide regulatory stability for transactions carried out before its enactment.

The New Industry Model Law excludes Eletrobras and its subsidiaries from the National Privatization Program, which is a program originally created by the Brazilian government in 1990 to promote the process of privatization of state-owned companies.

Regulations under the New Industry Model Law include, among other items, rules relating to auction procedures, the form of power purchase agreements and the method of passing costs through to Final Consumers.  Under these regulations, all electricity-purchasing agents must contract all of their electricity demand under the guidelines of the new model.  Electricity-selling agents must have “ballast” for their sales (i.e., the amount of energy sold in CCEEs must be previously purchased under PPAs and/or generated by the seller’s own power plants).  Agents that do not comply with such requirements are subject to penalties imposed by ANEEL and CCEE.

Beginning in 2005, all electricity generation, distribution and trading companies, independent power producers and Free and Special Consumers are required to notify the MME, by August 1 of each year, of their estimated electricity demand or estimated electricity generation, as the case may be, for each of the subsequent five years.  Each distribution company is required to notify the MME, within the 60-day period preceding each electricity auction, of the amounts of electricity that it intends to contract in the auction.  Based on this information, the MME must establish the total amount of energy to be contracted in the Regulated Market and the list of generation projects that will be allowed to participate in the auctions.  Distribution companies will also be required to specify the portion of the contracted amount they intend to use to supply consumers qualified as Free Consumers.

Environments for the Trading of Electric Energy

Under the New Industry Model Law, electricity purchase and sale transactions are carried out in two different segments:  (i) the Regulated Market, which contemplates the purchase by distribution companies through public auctions of all electricity necessary to supply their consumers and (ii) the Free Market, which contemplates the purchase of electricity by non‑regulated entities (such as Free Consumers and energy traders).

Electricity distribution companies fulfill their electricity supply obligations primarily through public auctions.  In addition to these auctions, distribution companies will be able to purchase electricity outside the public bidding process from:  (i) generation companies that are connected directly to such distribution company, except for hydro generation companies with capacity higher than 30 MW and certain thermo generation companies, (ii) electricity generation projects participating in the initial phase of the Proinfa Program, a program designed to diversify Brazil’s energy sources, (iii) the Itaipu power plant, and (iv) energy sold by Hydroelectric Power Plants which concessions have been renewed by the government under Law No. 12,783/13 (in this latter case, in “energy quotas” distributed among the distribution companies by the federal government, at prices determined by MME/ANEEL).  The electricity generated by Itaipu continues to be sold by Eletrobras to the distribution concessionaires operating in the South/Southeast/Midwest Interconnected Power System, although no specific contract was entered into by such concessionaires.  The rates at which the Itaipu-generated electricity is traded are denominated in U.S. dollars and established pursuant to a treaty between Brazil and Paraguay.  As a consequence, Itaipu rates rise or fall in accordance with the variation of the U.S. dollar/real  exchange rate.  Changes in the price of Itaipu-generated electricity are, however, subject to the Parcel A Cost recovery mechanism discussed below under “—Distribution Tariffs.”

46

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

The Regulated Market

In the Regulated Market, distribution companies purchase their expected electricity requirements for their captive consumers from generators through public auctions.  The auctions are administered by ANEEL, either directly or indirectly through the CCEE.

Electricity purchases are made through two types of bilateral agreements:  Energy Agreements (Contratos de Quantidade de Energia) and Capacity Agreements (Contratos de Disponibilidade de Energia).  Under an Energy Agreement, a generator commits to supply a certain amount of electricity and assumes the risk that its electricity supply could be adversely affected by hydrological conditions and low reservoir levels, among other conditions, which could interrupt the supply of electricity.  In such cases, the generator would be required to purchase the electricity elsewhere in order to comply with its supply commitments.  Under a Capacity Agreement, a generator commits to make a certain amount of capacity available to the Regulated Market.  In such case, the generator’s revenue is guaranteed and the distributors must bear the risk of a supply shortage.  Together, these agreements comprise the energy purchase agreements in the Regulated Market, Contratos de Comercialização de Energia no Ambiente Regulado - CCEAR.

According to the New Industry Model Law, within certain limits (as explained below), electricity distribution entities are entitled to pass through to their respective consumers the costs related to electricity they purchased through public auction as well as any taxes and industry charges.

With respect to the granting of new concessions, the newly enacted regulations require bids for new Hydroelectric Facilities to include, among other things, the minimum percentage of electricity to be supplied to the Regulated Market.

The Free Market

The Free Market covers transactions between generation concessionaires, Independent Power Producers, self-generators, energy traders, importers of electric energy, Free Consumers and Special Consumers, as defined below.  Independent Power Producers are generation entities that sell the totality or part of their electricity to Free Consumers, distribution concessionaires and trading agents, among others.  The Free Market will also include existing bilateral contracts between generators and distributors until they expire.  Upon expiration, such contracts must be executed under the New Industry Model Law guidelines.

A consumer that is eligible to choose its supplier (a potentially Free Consumer) may only rescind its contract with the local distributor and become a Free Consumer by notifying such distributor at least 15 days before the date such distributor is required to state its estimated electricity needs for the next auction.  Further, such consumer may only begin acquiring electricity from another supplier in the year following the one in which the local distributor was notified.  Once a potentially Free Consumer has opted for the Free Market, it may only return to the regulated system after giving the distributor of its region five years’ advance notice, provided that the distributor may reduce such notice period at its discretion.  This extended notice period seeks to assure that, if necessary, the distributor is able to buy the additional energy in the Regulated Market without imposing extra costs on the captive market.

In addition to Free Consumers, certain consumers with capacity equal to or greater than 500 kW may choose to purchase energy in the Free Market, subject to certain terms and conditions.  These consumers are called “Special Consumers”.  Special Consumers may only purchase energy from (i) Small Hydroelectric Power Plants with capacity between 1,000 kW and 30,000 kW, (ii) generators with capacity limited to 1,000 kW, and (iii) alternative energy generators (solar, wind and biomass enterprises) whose capacity supplied to the system does not exceed 30,000 kW.

47

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

State-owned generators may sell electricity to Free Consumers; however, unlike private generators, they may only do so through an auction process.

Auctions on the Regulated Market

Electricity auctions for new generation projects in process are held (i) five years before the initial delivery date (referred to as “A-5” auctions) or (ii) three years before the initial delivery date (referred to as “A-3” auctions).  Electricity auctions from existing power generation facilities take place (i) one year before the initial delivery date (referred to as “A-1” auctions) or (ii) approximately four months before the delivery date (referred to as “market adjustments”).  The bid announcements of the auctions are prepared by ANEEL, in compliance with guidelines established by the MME, which include a requirement to use the lowest energy price as the criterion to determine the winner of the auction.

Each generation company that participates in an auction executes a contract for purchase and sale of electricity with each distribution company, in proportion to the distribution companies’ respective estimated demand for electricity.  The only exception to these rules relates to the market adjustment auction, where the contracts are between specific selling and distribution companies.  The CCEAR of both “A-5” and “A-3” auctions have a term of between 15 and 30 years, and the CCEAR of “A-1” auctions have a term between five and 15 years.  Contracts arising from market adjustment auctions are limited to a two-year term.  The total amount of energy contracted in such market adjustment auctions may not exceed 1.0% of the total amount of energy contracted by each distributor.

With respect to the CCEAR related to electricity generated by existing generation facilities, there are three alternatives for the permanent reduction of contracted electricity:  (i) compensation for the exit of potentially Free Consumers from the Regulated Market, (ii) a reduction, at the distribution company’s discretion, of up to 4.0% per year in the annual contracted amount due to market deviations from estimated market projections, beginning two years after the initial electricity demand was declared and (iii) adjustments to the amount of electricity established in energy acquisition contracts entered into before March 17, 2004.

Since 2005, CCEE has conducted 17 auctions for new generation projects, 10 auctions for existing power generation facilities, two auctions for alternative generation projects and four auctions for biomass and wind power generation, qualified as “reserve energy.”  No later than August 1st of each year, generators and distributors must provide their estimated electricity generation or estimated electricity demand for the five subsequent years.  Based on this information, the MME establishes the total amount of electricity to be traded in the auction and decides which generation companies may participate in the auction.  The auction is carried out in two phases via an electronic system.  As a general rule, contracts entered into in an auction have the following terms (i) from 15 to 30 years from commencement of supply in cases of new generation projects, (ii) from five to 15 years beginning in the year following the auction in cases of existing power generation facilities, (iii) from 10 to 30 years from commencement of supply in cases of alternate generation projects, (iv) 15 years from commencement of supply in cases of biomass reserve energy and (v) 20 years from commencement of supply in cases of wind power reserve energy.

After the completion of the auction, generators and distributors execute the CCEAR, in which the parties establish the price and amount of the energy contracted in the auction.  Great part of our CCEARs provides that the price will be adjusted annually in accordance with the IPCA.  However, we also use other indexes to adjust prices in our CCEARs, such as fuel prices.  Distributors grant financial guaranties (principally receivables from the distribution service) to generators in order to secure their payment obligations under the CCEAR. 

The Annual Reference Value

The regulation also establishes a mechanism, the Annual Reference Value, which limits the amounts of costs that can be passed through to Final Consumers.  The Annual Reference Value corresponds to the weighted average of electricity prices in the “A-5” and “A-3” auctions, calculated for all distribution companies.

The Annual Reference Value creates an incentive for distribution companies to contract for their expected electricity demands at the lowest price in “A-5” auctions and “A-3” auctions.  Distributors that buy electricity at a price lower than the Annual Reference Value in these auctions are allowed to pass through the full amount of the Annual Reference Value to consumers for three years.  The Annual Reference Value is also applied in the first three years of power purchase agreements for new power generation projects.  After the fourth year, the electricity acquisition costs from these projects are allowed to be fully passed through.  The regulation establishes the following limitations on the ability of distribution companies to pass through costs to consumers:  (i) no pass-through of costs for electricity purchases that exceed 103.0% of actual demand; (ii) limited pass-through of costs for electricity purchases made in an “A-3” auction, if the volume of the acquired electricity exceeds 2.0% of the demand for electricity purchased in the “A-5” auctions; (iii) limited pass-through of electricity acquisition costs from new electricity generation projects if the volume contracted under the new contracts related to existing generation facilities is lower than 96.0% of the volume of electricity provided for in the expiring contract; and (iv) full pass-through of costs for electricity purchases from existing facilities in the “A-1” auction is limited to 1% of the charge verified in the year prior to the distributor’s notification of estimated electricity demand to the MME.  If the acquired electricity in the “A-1” auction exceeds 1.0% of the charge, pass-through of costs related to the excess charge amount to Final Consumers is limited to 70.0% of the average value of such acquisition costs of electricity generated by existing generation facilities for delivery commencing in 2007 and ending in 2009.  The MME establishes the maximum acquisition price for electricity generated by existing projects that is included in auctions for the sale of electricity to distributors; and, if distributors do not comply with the obligation to fully contract their demand, the pass-through of the costs from energy acquired in the short-term market will be the lower of the spot price, Preço de Liquidação de Diferenças (“PLD”) and the Annual Reference Value.

48

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Electric Energy Trading Convention

ANEEL Resolutions No. 109, of 2004 and No. 210, of 2006, govern the Electric Energy Trading Convention (Convenção de Comercialização de Energia Elétrica).  This convention regulates the organization and administration of the CCEE as well as the conditions for trading electric energy.  It also defines, among other things, (i) the rights and obligations of CCEE participants, (ii) the penalties to be imposed on defaulting participants, (iii) the structure for dispute resolution, (iv) the trading rules in both Regulated and Free Markets and (v) the accounting and clearing process for short‑term transactions.

Restricted Activities of Distributors

Distributors in the Interconnected Power System are not permitted to (i) conduct businesses related to the generation or Transmission of electric energy, (ii) sell electric energy to Free Consumers, except for those in their concession area and under the same conditions and tariffs that are applied to captive consumers, (iii) hold, directly or indirectly, any interest in any other company, corporation or partnership or (iv) conduct businesses that are unrelated to their respective concessions, except for those permitted by law or in the relevant concession agreement.  Generators are not allowed to control or hold relevant equity interests in distributors.

Elimination of Self-Dealing

Since the purchase of electricity for captive consumers is now performed through the Regulated Market, “self‑dealing” (under which distributors were permitted to meet up to 30.0% of their electric energy needs through energy that was either self-produced or acquired from affiliated companies) is no longer permitted, except in the context of agreements that were approved by ANEEL before the enactment of the New Industry Model Law.

Challenges to the Constitutionality of the New Industry Model Law

Political parties are currently challenging the New Industry Model Law on constitutional grounds before the Brazilian Supreme Court.  In October 2007, a decision of the Brazilian Supreme Court on injunctions presented on the matter was published, denying the injunctions by a majority of votes.  To date, the Brazilian Supreme Court has not reached a final decision, and we do not know when such a decision may be reached.  While the Brazilian Supreme Court is reviewing the New Industry Model Law, its provisions remain in effect.  Regardless of the Supreme Court’s final decision, certain portions of the New Industry Model Law relating to restrictions on distributors engaging in businesses unrelated to the distribution of electricity, including sales of energy by distributors to Free Consumers and the elimination of self-dealing, are expected to remain in full force and effect.

If all or a relevant portion of the New Industry Model Law is deemed unconstitutional by the Brazilian Supreme Court, the regulatory scheme introduced by the New Industry Model Law may become void, which will create uncertainty as to how and when the Brazilian government will be able to reform the electric energy sector.

 

49

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Ownership Limitations

ANEEL had established limits on the concentration of certain services and activities within the electric energy industry, which it eliminated through Resolution No. 378 of November 10, 2009.

Pursuant to Resolution No. 378, ANEEL will submit potential antitrust violations within the electric energy sector for analysis by the Economical Law Department of the Ministry of Justice (Secretaria de Direito Econômico – SDE).  ANEEL can also, spontaneously or upon SDE’s request, analyze potential antitrust acts by identifying:  (i) the relevant markets, (ii) the influence of the agents involved in the exchange of energy on the submarkets where the parties operate, (iii) the actual exercise of market power in connection with market prices, (iv) the participation of the parties in the power generation market, (v) the Transmission, distribution and commercialization of energy in all submarkets, and (vi) the efficiency gains of the distribution agents during the tariffs review processes.

In practical terms, ANEEL’s attribution is limited to supplying the SDE with technical information to support SDE’s technical opinion.  SDE, on its turn, will observe ANEEL’s comments and appointments and will only be able to disregard them upon a motivated decision.

Tariffs for the Use of the Distribution and Transmission Systems

ANEEL oversees tariff regulations that govern access to the distribution and Transmission systems and establish tariffs for these systems.  The tariffs are (i) network usage charges, which are charges for the use of the proprietary local network of distribution companies (“TUSD”) and (ii) tariffs for the use of the Transmission system, which is the Basic Network and its ancillary facilities (“TUST”).

TUSD

The TUSD is paid by generators and Free and Special Consumers for the use of the distribution system of the distribution concessionaire to which the relevant generator or Free or Special Consumer is connected.  The TUSD has two purposes:  (i) to remunerate the concessionaire for the use of the proprietary local network, through the TUSD Service, which varies in accordance with each consumer’s energy peak load, and (ii) to contemplate the regulatory charges applicable to the use of the local network, through the TUSD Charges, which are set by regulatory authorities and linked to the quantity of energy consumed by each consumer.  The amount to be paid by the agent connected to the distribution system is calculated by multiplying the amount of electricity contracted with the distribution concessionaire for each connection point, in kW, by two tariffs set by ANEEL:  (i) a tariff in R$/kW, which includes the remuneration of the distribution and Transmission concessionaire and (ii) a tariff in R$/MWh, which includes electric energy-related charges and other regulatory costs related to the Distribution Network.

TUST

The TUST is paid by distribution companies, generators and Free and Special Consumers for the use of the Basic Network and is revised annually according to (i) an inflation index and (ii) the annual revenue of the Transmission companies, as determined by ANEEL.  According to criteria established by ANEEL, owners of the different parts of the Transmission network were required to transfer the coordination of their facilities to the ONS in return for receiving regulated payments from the Transmission system users.  Network users, including generation companies, distribution companies and free and special Consumers, have signed contracts with the ONS and the Transmission companies (represented by the ONS) entitling them to the use of the Transmission network in return for the payment of certain tariffs. 

Distribution Tariffs

Distribution tariff rates (including the TUSD) are subject to review by ANEEL, which has the authority to adjust and review these tariffs in response to changes in energy purchase costs and market conditions.  When adjusting distribution tariffs, ANEEL divides the costs of distribution companies between (i) costs that are not under the control of the distributor, or Parcel A Costs, and (ii) costs that are under control of distributors, or Parcel B Costs.  The readjustment of tariffs is based on a formula that takes into account the division of costs between the two categories.

50

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Parcel A 7 Costs include, among others, the following factors:

·         costs of electricity purchased from Itaipu;

·         costs of electricity purchased pursuant to bilateral agreements that are freely negotiated between the parties;

·         costs of electricity purchased pursuant to CCEARs;

·         certain other charges for use and connection to the Transmission and distribution systems;

·         the cost of regulatory charges; and

·         the costs associated with research and development and energy efficient consumption.

Parcel B8 Costs include, among others, the following factors:

·         a rate of return on investments in energy distribution assets;

·         the depreciation on those assets;

·         the operating expenses related to the operation of those assets; and

·         non‑recoverable receivables;

each as established and periodically revised by ANEEL.

The tariffs are established taking into consideration Parcel A and Parcel B Costs and certain market components used by ANEEL as reference for adjusting the tariffs.

Electricity distribution concessionaires are entitled to periodic revisions of their tariffs every four or five years.  These revisions are aimed at (i) assuring necessary revenues to cover efficient Parcel B operational costs and adequate compensation for investments deemed essential for the services within the scope of each such company’s concession and (ii) determining the “X factor”, which is based on three components:  (a) expected gains of productivity from increase in scale, (b) labor costs, and (c) investments.  In the current tariff cycle, ANEEL has changed the formula to calculate the X factor.  The X factor is now based on the potential increases in productivity, which is based on the level of market growth and increase in number of consumers and service quality.  In addition, it takes into account a target of efficient operating expenses.  The increases in productivity and the target of efficient operating expenses will be determined at each periodic review.  The service quality component will be determined at each annual adjustment following the third periodic revision cycle.

The X factor is used to adjust the proportion of the change in the IGP-M index that is used in the annual adjustments.  Accordingly, upon the completion of each periodic revision, application of the X factor requires distribution companies to share their productivity gains with Final Consumers.

Each distribution company’s concession agreement also provides for an annual adjustment.  In general, Parcel A Costs are fully passed through to consumers.  Parcel B Costs, however, are mostly restated for inflation in accordance with the IGP-M index.

In addition, electricity distribution concessionaires are entitled to an extraordinary tariff review (revisão extraordinária) on a case-by-case basis, to ensure their financial stability and compensate them for unpredictable costs, including taxes that significantly change their cost structure.


7 Pursuant to ANEEL’s Resolution No. 457/2011, for the generating units embedded in our distribution companies, operating and maintenance costs have been allocated to Parcel A, and depreciation has been excluded from Parcel B.

51

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

With the introduction of the New Industry Model Law, the MME has acknowledged that the variable costs associated with the purchase of electric energy may be included by means of the Parcel A Account or CVA, an account created to recognize some of our costs when ANEEL adjusts the tariffs of our distribution subsidiaries.  See “Item 5—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Overview—Recoverable Costs Variations—Parcel A Costs.”

In November 2011, ANEEL established the methodology and procedures applicable to the periodic revisions for 2011 through 2014 for distribution concessionaires, based on the practices developed during a previous round of the periodic tariff reviews.  For information on the new methodology applicable to the third periodic revision cycle, see “Item 3.  Risk Factors—The tariffs that we charge for sales of electricity to captive consumers are determined by ANEEL pursuant to concession agreements with the Brazilian government, so our operating revenues could be adversely affected if ANEEL makes decisions relating to our tariffs that are not favorable to us.”

Government Incentives to the Energy Sector

In 2000, a Federal decree created the Thermoelectric Priority Program, Programa Prioritário de Termeletricidade (“PPT”) for purposes of diversifying the Brazilian energy matrix and decreasing its strong dependency on Hydroelectric Power Plants.  The incentives granted to the Thermoelectric Power Plants included in the PPT are:  (i) guaranty of gas supply for twenty years, pursuant to MME regulations, (ii) an assurance that the costs related to the acquisition of the electric energy produced by Thermoelectric Power Plants will be transferred to tariffs up to the normative value established by ANEEL and (iii) guaranteed access to a special financing program for the electric energy industry from the Brazilian Economic and Social Development Bank (“BNDES”).

In 2002, the Federal Government established the Electric Energy Alternative Sources Incentive Program (Programa de Incentivo às Fontes Alternativas de Energia Elétrica - Proinfa) (the “Proinfa Program”).  Under the Proinfa Program, Eletrobras purchased the energy generated by alternative energy sources for a period of up to 20 years, and this energy is to be acquired by distribution companies for delivery to Final Consumers.  In its initial phase, the Proinfa Program was limited to a total contracted capacity of 3,300 MW.  The objective of this initiative was to reach a contracted capacity of up to 10.0% of the total annual consumption of electricity in Brazil within 20 years from 2002. The Proinfa Program charge is collected from Final Consumer on a monthly basis. Although provided for in Law No. 10,438/2002, it is still uncertain whether the Federal Government will regulate and implement the second phase of the Program.

In order to create incentives for alternative generators, the Federal Government has established that a reduction of not less than 50.0% must be applied to TUSD amounts owed by (i) Small Hydroelectric Power Plants with capacity between 1,000 kW and 30,000 kW, (ii) generators with capacity equal to 1,000 kW and (iii) alternative energy generators (solar, eolic and biomass generators) with capacity equal to 30,000 kW.  The reduction is applicable to the TUSD due by the generation source and also by its consumer.  The amount of the TUSD reduction will be included as “financial components” in the tariff readjustment or tariff revision.

Regulatory Charges

EER

The Reserve Energy Charge, Encargo de Energia de Reserva (“EER”) is a regulatory charge assessed on a monthly basis designed to raise funds for energy reserves contracted by CCEE.  These energy reserves will be used to increase the safety of the energy supply in the Interconnected Power System.  The EER is collected from Final Consumers of the Interconnected Power System on a monthly basis.

RGR Fund and UBP

In certain circumstances, electric energy companies are compensated for certain assets used in connection with a concession if the concession is revoked or is not renewed.  In 1957, the Brazilian government created a reserve fund designed to provide funds for such compensation (“RGR Fund”).  Public-industry electric companies must make monthly contributions to the RGR Fund at an annual rate equal to 2.5% of the company’s fixed assets in service, not to exceed 3.0% of total operating revenues in any year.  Law No. 12,431/2011 extended the imposition of this fee until 2035.  However, Law No. 12,783/13 provides that, as of January 1, 2013, such charge would no longer be levied on distribution companies or new generation and Transmission concessionaries.

52

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

The Federal Government has imposed a fee on Independent Power Producers that use hydropower source similar to the fee levied on public-industry generation companies in connection with the RGR.  Independent Power Producers are required to make contributions for using a public asset, Uso de Bem Público (“UBP”) according to the rules set out in the relevant concession’s public bidding process.  Eletrobras received the UBP payments until December 31, 2002.  All charges related to the UBP since December 31, 2002 have been paid directly to the Federal Government.

CDE Account

In 2002, the Federal Government instituted the Electric Energy Development Account, Conta de Desenvolvimento Energético (“CDE Account”), which is funded through annual payments made by concessionaires for the use of public assets, penalties and fines imposed by ANEEL and the annual fees paid by agents offering electric energy to Final Consumers, by means of a charge to be added to the tariffs for the use of the Transmission and distribution systems.  These fees are adjusted annually.  The CDE Account was originally created to support (i) the development of energy production throughout Brazil, (ii) the production of energy by alternative energy sources, and (iii) the universalization of electric energy services throughout Brazil.  In addition, the CDE Account subsidizes the operations of theremoelectric generation companies for the purchase of fuel in isolated areas not connected to the Interconnected Power System, which costs were supported by the Fuel Usage Quota Account (Conta de Consumo de Combustível) (the “CCC Account”) before the enactment of Law No. 12,783/13.  As from January 24, 2013 (Provisional Measure 605/13), the CDE Account subsidizes discounts for certain categories of consumers, such as Special Consumers, rural consumers, distribution concessionaires and permissionaires, among others. The CDE Account will be in effect for 25 years from 2002.  It is regulated by the ANEEL and managed by Eletrobras.

ESS

Resolution no. 173 of November 28, 2005 established a provision for the System Service Charge, Encargo de Serviço do Sistema (“ESS”), which since January 2006 has been included in price and fee readjustments for distribution concessionaires that are part of the National Interconnected Network, Sistema Interligado Nacional.  This charge is based on the annual estimates made by ONS on October 31 of each year.

Fee for the Use of Water

The New Industry Model Law requires that holders of a concession and authorization to use water resources must pay a fee of 6.75% of the value of the energy they generate by using such facilities.  This charge must be paid to the federal district, states and municipalities where the plant or the plant’s reservoir is located.

ANEEL Inspection Fee (TFSEE)

The ANEEL Inspection Fee is an annual fee due by the holders of concessions, permissions or authorizations in the proportion of their dimension and activities.  Currently, the ANEEL Inspection Fee is deducted from the RGR Fund.

Default on the Payment of Regulatory Charges

The New Industry Model Law provides that failure to pay required contributions to the regulatory, or certain other payments, such as those due from the purchase of electric energy in the Regulated Market or from Itaipu, will prevent the defaulting party from proceeding with readjustments or reviews of its tariffs (except for extraordinary reviews) and will also prevent the defaulting party from receiving funds from the RGR Fund and CDE Account.

Energy Reallocation Mechanism

Centrally dispatched hydrogenerators are protected against certain hydrological risks by the MRE, which attempts to mitigate the risks involved in the generation of hydrological energy by mandating that hydrogenerators share the hydrological risks of the Interconnected Power System.  Under Brazilian law, each Hydroelectric Power Plant is assigned an “Assured Energy”, which is determined in each relevant concession agreement, irrespective of the volume of electricity generated by the facility.  The MRE transfers surplus electricity from those generators that have produced electricity in excess of their Assured Energy to those generators that have produced less than their Assured Energy.  The effective generation dispatch is determined by ONS, which takes into account nationwide electricity demand and hydrological conditions.  The volume of electricity actually generated by the plant, whether less than or in excess of the Assured Energy, is priced pursuant to a tariff denominated “Energy Optimization Tariff” which covers the operation and maintenance costs of the plant.  This revenue or additional expense must be accounted for monthly by each generator.

53

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 5.                        OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this annual report.

We prepared our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report in accordance with IFRS, as issued by IASB. 

Overview

We are a holding company and, through subsidiaries, we (i) distribute electricity to consumers in our concession areas, (ii) generate electricity from conventional and renewable sources and develop generation projects and (iii) engage in electricity commercialization and (iv) the provision of electricity-related services.  We have four broad initiatives to improve our financial performance:  the expansion of our generation Installed Capacity through greenfield and brownfield investments, the acquisition of additional distributors, the consolidation of our commercialization business as a market leader and the development our services business.

Two very important drivers of our financial performance are the operating income margin and cash flows from our regulated distribution business.  In recent years, this business has produced reasonably stable margins, and its cash flows, while sometimes subject to short‑term variability, have been stable over the medium term. Nevertheless, here are factors beyond our control that can have a significant impact, positive or adverse, on our financial performance.  We face periodic changes in our tariff structure, resulting from the periodic review of our tariffs. In 2011, a new methodology was defined by Aneel for the third cycle of periodic reviews and some of our distributors already had a reduction in average tariffs in 2012.  For information on the new methodology applicable to the third periodic review cycle (2011 to 2014), see “Item 3.  Risk Factors—The tariffs that we charge for sales of electricity to captive consumers are determined by ANEEL pursuant to concession agreements with the Brazilian government, so our operating revenues could be adversely affected if ANEEL makes decisions relating to our tariffs that are not favorable to us.”

We account for four of our generation jointly-controlled entities (BAESA, ENERCAN, Foz do Chapecó and Centrais Elétricas da Paraíba – EPASA) using the proportionate consolidation method.  Upon adoption of IFRS in 2010, our generation subsidiary CERAN has become fully consolidated.  The first generation unit of Foz do Chapecó became operational in October 2010, the second generation unit became operational in November 2010, the third generation unit became operational in December 2010 and the fourth and final generation unit became operational in March 2011.  The Thermoelectric Power Plants Termoparaíba and Termonordeste, both powered by fuel oil from the EPASA complex, became operational in December 2010 and January 2011, respectively.  Since August 1, 2011, CPFL Energias Renováveis has been fully consolidated in our financial statements.

In September 2009, we acquired the Santa Clara complex, which is fully consolidated through our investment in CPFL Energias Renováveis.  Although the construction of the transmission line is not yet completed, these wind farms are ready to start generating energy, we have been receiving revenues deriving from the Santa Clara wind farms, as contracted through the “2009 Auction Reserve Energy” (Leilão de Energia de Reserva), since July 2012. In July 2010, we acquired the Campo dos Ventos II wind farm and the Campo dos Ventos Complex, which are also fully consolidated through CPFL Energias Renováveis.  Campo dos Ventos II is scheduled to start operations in 2013, and the wind farms of the Campo dos Ventos Complex are scheduled to start operations in 2015.  The Macacos I and São Benedito wind farms are scheduled to start operations in 2013 and 2016, respectively.

54

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Additionally, in October 2009, we established CPFL Bio Formosa, which is fully consolidated in our financial statements through CPFL Energias Renováveis.  The main purpose of CPFL Bio Formosa is the generation of thermoelectric energy through co‑generation plants powered by sugar-cane bagasse and straw.  It began operations in the third quarter of 2011.

Our indirect subsidiaries CPFL Bio Buriti, CPFL Bio Ipê and CPFL Bio Pedra are closely-held companies that were established on January 27, 2010 with the main purpose of generating thermoelectric energy and water stream through co-generation plants powered by sugar-cane bagasse and straw.  On August 26, 2010, CPFL Bio Pedra participated in the wind power reserve auction promoted by ANEEL, in which it entered into an agreement for the supply of 24.3 MW medium of electricity for a term of 15 years beginning in 2013.  CPFL Bio Ipê and CPFL Bio Pedra began operations in the second quarter of 2012.  CPFL Bio Buriti started operations in the second quarter of 2011.

In 2011, we entered into an agreement with ERSA to combine assets and projects relating to renewable energy sources, and established CPFL Energias Renováveis.  We have been fully consolidating CPFL Energias Renováveis in our financial statements since August 1, 2011.  In December 2011, through CPFL Energias Renováveis, we acquired 100% of the shares of Jantus, a company engaged in generation of energy through renewable sources, especially wind power.  By acquiring Jantus, we added the following projects to our portfolio:  (i) four wind farms in operation in the state of Ceará with Installed Capacity of 210 MW, and (ii) wind farm projects with total Installed Capacity of 732 MW in the states of Ceará and Piauí, of which 412 MW has already been certified and eligible for participation in the next electricity auctions.

In January, 2012, through our subsidiary CPFL Energias Renováveis, we entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement for the acquisition of 100% of the shares of Atlântica I, Atlântica II, Atlântica IV and Atlântica V, companies engaged in generation of energy through wind sources, with an aggregate Installed Capacity of 120 MW.  ANEEL has approved transfer of the control of the Atlântica Complex to CPFL Renováveis, as published on March 26, 2012.

In March, 2012, through our subsidiary CPFL Energias Renováveis, we entered into an agreement to purchase 100% of the electric energy and water steam co-generation assets of SPE Lacenas Participações Ltda., a subsidiary of Usina Açucareira Ester (“Usina Ester”).  Usina Ester holds authorization from ANEEL to exploit electric energy from biomass (sugar cane), with Installed Capacity of 40.0 MW.  These co-generation plants, located in the city of Cosmópolis, in the state of São Paulo, are fully operational.  The acquisition was complete on October 18, 2012.

In June  2012, through our subsidiary CPFL Energias Renováveis, we executed a Sale and Purchase Agreement for the acquisition of 100% of the shares of BVP, the holding company of Bons Ventos, which hold authorizations to explore wind farms with an aggregate Installed Capacity of 157.5 MW.  The acquisition was complete on June 19, 2012

In November, 2012, the Tanquinho solar power plant (“Tanquinho”) started operations.  Tanquinho is the first solar power plant in the state of São Paulo and the largest in Brazil.  Tanquinho is located in the city of Campinas, with an Installed Capacity of 1.1 MWp.  It is located in an area of 13,700 square meters  at Tanquinho Substation, which belongs to one of our distribution subsidiaries.  The Tanquinho plant is expected to generate approximately 1.6 GWh per year.  Our subsidiary CPFL Energias Renováveis was responsible for building this project and will be responsible for managing and operating the plant.

On December 19, 2012, we, Equatorial Energia S.A. (“Equatorial”) and Jorge Queiroz de Moraes Junior (“Controlling Shareholder”) signed a binding “Investment, Purchase and Sale Agreement and Other Covenants” commitment, with the following objective: (i) disposal to Equatorial by the  Controlling Shareholder of his direct and indirect interest in the control of Rede Energia S.A. (“Rede”) and other companies controlled by Rede (“Acquisition”); and (ii) investment by Equatorial and CPFL Energia of the outlay required for the operational and financial recovery of the companies in the Rede Group, including the electric energy distribution concessionaires controlled by Rede, which are under intervention by ANEEL (“Investment”). The Acquisition and the Investment are interlinked transactions, and the main preceding conditions are as follows: (i) prior consent by ANEEL, resulting in lifting of the interventions in relation to the concessionaires controlled by Rede; (ii) approval by the Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica – CADE; (iii) approval by creditors of Rede and other companies in the Rede group in the process of court reorganization under the court reorganization plan (iv) obtaining the necessary approval on the part of certain creditors and minority shareholders of the companies involved, in accordance with the pertinent law, contracts and shareholders agreements; and (v) obtaining the pertinent corporate approvals

55

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Background
Regulated Distribution Tariffs

Our results of operations are significantly affected by changes in regulated tariffs for electricity.  In particular, most of our revenues are derived from sales of electricity to captive Final Consumers at regulated tariffs.  In 2012, sales to captive consumers represented 68.0% of the volume of electricity we delivered and 70.2% of our operating revenues, compared to 69.9% and 75.5%, respectively, in 2011.  These proportions may decline if consumers migrate from captive to free status.

Our operating revenues and our margins depend substantially on the tariff-setting process, and our management focuses on maintaining a constructive relationship with ANEEL, the Brazilian government and other market participants so that the tariff-setting process fairly reflects our interests and those of our consumers and shareholders.  For a description of tariff regulations, see “Item 4.  Information on the Company—The Brazilian Power Industry—Distribution Tariffs.”

Tariffs are determined separately for each of our eight distribution subsidiaries as follows:

·         Our concession agreements provide for an annual adjustment to take account of changes in our costs, which for this purpose are divided into costs that are beyond our control (known as Parcel A Costs) and costs that we can control (known as Parcel B Costs).  Parcel A Costs include, among other things, increased prices under long‑term supply contracts, and Parcel B Costs include, among others, the return on investment related to our concessions and their expansion, as well as maintenance and operational costs.  Our ability to fully pass through our electricity acquisition costs to Final Consumers is subject to:  (a) our ability to accurately forecast our energy needs and (b) a ceiling linked to a reference value, the Annual Reference Value.  The Annual Reference Value is the weighted average of electricity acquisition costs resulting from electricity prices of all public auctions carried out by ANEEL and CCEE in the Regulated Market for electricity to be delivered five and three years from any such auction and only applies during the first three years following the commencement of delivery of the acquired electricity.  See “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Brazilian Power Industry—The New Industry Model Law” for a more detailed description of all the limitations on the ability of distribution companies to fully pass through their electricity acquisition costs to Final Consumers.  Under agreements that were in force before the enactment of these regulatory reforms, we pass through the costs of acquired electricity subject to a ceiling determined by the Brazilian government.  The annual adjustment of tariffs occurs every April for CPFL Paulista, every June for RGE, every October for CPFL Piratininga and every February for CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Leste Paulista, CPFL Sul Paulista, CPFL Mococa and CPFL Jaguari.  There is no annual adjustment in a year with a periodic revision.

·         Our concession agreements provide for a periodic revision (revisão periódica), every five years for CPFL Paulista and RGE and every four years for CPFL Piratininga, CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Leste Paulista, CPFL Sul Paulista, CPFL Mococa and CPFL Jaguari, to restore the financial equilibrium of our tariffs as contemplated by the concession agreements and to determine a reduction factor (known as the X factor) in the amount of Parcel B Cost increases passed on to our consumers.  ANEEL’s Resolution No. 457/2011 has established the methodology applicable to the third periodic revision cycle (2011 to 2014).  For additional information, see “Item 3.  Risk Factors—The tariffs that we charge for sales of electricity to captive consumers are determined by ANEEL pursuant to concession agreements with the Brazilian government, so our operating revenues could be adversely affected if ANEEL makes decisions relating to our tariffs that are not favorable to us” and “Item 4.  Information on the Company—The Brazilian Power Industry—Distribution Tariffs.”

56

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

·         Brazilian law also provides for an extraordinary revision (revisão extraordinária) to take account of unforeseen changes in our cost structure.  Since January 2009, our distribution companies no longer collect the extraordinary revision that was instituted as a result of the national energy rationing process that occurred in 2001.  The last extraordinary revision took place on January 24, 2013 to adjust our tariffs as a result of the changes introduced by Law No. 12,783/13.  Law No. 12,783/13 reduced the CDE charge and eliminated the CCC and RGR charges, therefore reducing the Parcel A Costs (energy prices, charges for the use of the Basic Network and regulatory charges, which we pass on to our consumers). 

Annual Adjustment

Tariff increases apply differently to different consumer classes, with generally higher increases for consumers using higher voltages, to reduce the effects of historical cross-subsidies in their favor that were mostly eliminated in 2007.  The following table sets forth the average percentage increase in our tariffs resulting from each annual adjustment from 2009 through the date of this annual report.  Rates of tariff increase should be evaluated in light of the Brazilian inflation rate.  See “—Background—Brazilian Economic Conditions.”

 

CPFL
Paulista

CPFL
Piratininga

RGE

CPFL
Santa Cruz

CPFL
Mococa

CPFL Leste
Paulista

CPFL Sul
Paulista

CPFL
Jaguari

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Economic adjustment(1)

13.58%

2.81%

10.44%

10.69%

10.52%

10.58%

11.80%

11.01%

Regulatory adjustment(2)

7.64%

3.17%

8.51%

13.40%

0.66%

2.36%

-0.16%

0.35%

Total adjustment

21.22%

5.98%

18.95%

24.09%

11.18%

12.94%

11.64%

11.36%

2010(3) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Economic adjustment(1)

1.55%

8.59%

1.72%

1.90%

4.15%

-6.32%

4.30%

5.81%

Regulatory adjustment(2)

1.15%

1.52%

10.65%

8.19%

-0.17%

-6.89%

1.36%

-0.65%

Total adjustment

2.70%

10.11%

12.37%

10.09%

3.98%

-13.21%

5.66%

5.16%

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Economic adjustment(1)

6.11%

4.45%

8.58%

8.01%

6.84%

6.42%

6.57%

5.22%

Regulatory adjustment(2)

1.27%

0.98%

8.63%

15.60%

2.66%

1.34%

1.45%

0.25%

Total adjustment

7.38%

5.43%

17.21%

23.61%

9.50%

7.76%

8.02%

5.47%

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Economic adjustment(1)

1.96%

7.71%

0.49%

4.36%

7.20%

-2.20%

-4.41%

-7.15%

Regulatory adjustment(2)

1.75%

1.08%

11.02%

3.74%

1.80%

2.28%

0.69%

0.05%

Total adjustment

3.71%

8.79%

11.51%

8.10%

9.00%

0.08%

-3.72%

-7.10%

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Economic adjustment(1)

(4)

(4)

(4)

12.14%

-1.83%

7.96%

7.21%

10.76%

Regulatory adjustment(2)

(4)

(4)

(4)

-2.82%

8.83%

-1.48%

-0.90%

-8.05%

Total adjustment

(4)

(4)

(4)

9.32%

7.00%

6.48%

6.31%

2.71%

 


(1)           This portion of the adjustment primarily reflects the inflation rate for the period and is used as a basis for the following year’s adjustment.

(2)           This portion of the adjustment reflects settlement of regulatory assets and liabilities we present in our regulatory financial information, primarily the CVA, and is not considered in the calculation of the following year’s adjustment.  See note 35 to our financial statements included in this annual report.

(3)           The 2010 annual adjustment is based on the “Addendum to the Concession Contracts”, described below.

(4)           Annual adjustments for CPFL Paulista, RGE and CPFL Piratininga occur in April, June and October, respectively.

57

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

On February 2, 2010, ANEEL approved a proposal for an addendum to the concession contracts for electric energy  distributors (the “Addendum to the Concession Contracts”).  The Addendum to the Concession Contracts changes the methodology for calculating the annual tariff adjustment, excluding the effect of market variations resulting from the difference between the projected and actual energy sold (mainly related to regulatory charges) from the calculation base when calculating tariff adjustments.  See “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Brazilian Power Industry – Distribution Tariffs” for further information on the calculation of our tariffs. 

The new methodology was applied in calculating the tariff adjustments as of February 2010 for our eight distribution subsidiaries.

Periodic Revisions

The following table sets forth the percentage change in our tariffs resulting from the first, second and third cycles of periodic revisions.

 

First cycle

Second cycle

Third cycle

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustment

Economic

Adjustment

Economic

Adjustment

Economic

date

adjustment

Date

adjustment

date

adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(%)

 

(%)

 

(%)

CPFL Paulista

April 2003

20.66

April 2008

-14.00

April 2013

-

CPFL Piratininga

October 2003

10.14

October 2007

-12.77

October 2013

4.45%

RGE

April 2003

27.96

April 2008

2.34

June 2013

-

CPFL Santa Cruz

February 2004

17.14

February 2008

-14.41

February 2012

4.36% (1)

CPFL Mococa

February 2004

21.73

February 2008

-7.60

February 2012

7.20% (1)

CPFL Leste Paulista

February 2004

20.10

February 2008

-2.18

February 2012

2.20% (1)

CPFL Sul Paulista

February 2004

12.29

February 2008

-5.19

February 2012

4.41% (1)

CPFL Jaguari

February 2004

- 6.17

February 2008

-5.17

February 2012

7.15% (1)


(1) As a result of ANEEL’s delay in determining the methodology applicable to the third periodic revision cycle, the periodic review process for CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Jaguari, CPFL Mococa, CPFL Leste Paulista and CPFL Sul Paulista was concluded on February 3, 2013 to February 3, 2012, without the ANEEL´s assessment for distribution subsidiaries´ administrative appeal. This appeal will assessment by ANEEL until February, 2014.

Sales to Potentially Free Consumers

The Brazilian government has introduced regulatory changes intended to foster the growth of open-market energy transactions by permitting qualifying consumers to opt out of the system of tariff regulation and become “free” consumers entitled to contract freely for electricity.  See “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Brazilian Power Industry—The Free Market.”  To date, as compared to the total number of our captive consumers, the number of potentially Free Consumers is relatively small, but they account for a significant amount of our electricity sales and revenues.  In 2012 and 2011, approximately 17.0% and 17.6%, respectively, of our electricity sales were to supply potentially Free Consumers.  Most of our potentially Free Consumers have not elected to become Free Consumers.  We believe this is because (i) they consider the advantages of negotiating for a long‑term contract at rates lower than the regulated tariff are outweighed by the need to bear additional costs (particularly Transmission costs) and the long‑term price risk and (ii) some of our potentially Free Consumers, who entered into contracts before July 1995, may only change to suppliers that purchase from renewable energy sources, such as Small Hydroelectric Power Plants or biomass.  Even if a consumer decides to migrate from the regulated tariff system and become a Free Consumer, it still has to pay us network usage charges, and such payments would mitigate the loss in operating income from any such migration.  We do not expect to see a substantial number of our consumers becoming Free Consumers, but the prospects for migration between the different markets (captive and free) over the long term, and its implications for our financial results, are difficult to predict.

Prices for Purchased Electricity

The prices of electricity purchased by our distribution companies under long‑term contracts executed in the Regulated Market are (i) approved by ANEEL in the case of agreements entered into before the New Industry Model Law and (ii) determined in auctions for agreements entered into thereafter, while the prices of electricity purchased in the Free Market are agreed by bilateral negotiation based on prevailing market rates.  In 2012, we purchased 60,252 GWh, compared to 50,853 GWh in 2011.  Prices under long-term contracts are adjusted annually to reflect increases in certain generation costs and inflation.  Most of our contracts have adjustments linked to the annual adjustment in distribution tariffs, so that the increased costs are passed through to our consumers in increased tariffs.  Since an increasing proportion of our energy is purchased at public auctions, the success of our strategies in these auctions affects our margins and our exposure to price and market risk, as our ability to pass through costs of electricity purchases depends on the successful projection of our expected demand.

58

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

We also purchase a substantial amount of electricity from Itaipu under take-or-pay obligations at prices that are governed by regulations adopted under an international agreement.  Electric utilities operating under concessions in the Midwest, South and Southeast regions of Brazil are required by law to purchase a portion of Brazil’s share of Itaipu’s available capacity.  In 2012, we purchased 10,781 GWh of electricity from Itaipu (17.9% of the electricity we purchased in terms of volume), as compared to 10,855 GWh (21.3% of the electricity we purchased) in 2011.  See “Item 4.  Information of the Company—Purchases of Electricity—Itaipu.”  The price of electricity from Itaipu is set in U.S. dollars to reflect the costs of servicing its indebtedness.  Accordingly, the price of electricity purchased from Itaipu increases in Brazilian reais when the real  depreciates against the U.S. dollar (and decreases when the real appreciates).  The change in our costs for Itaipu electricity in any year is subject to the Parcel A Cost recovery mechanism described below.

In 2012, our Installed Capacity reached 2,961 MW.  CPFL Bioenergia, Foz do Chapecó and Termonordeste power plants started operations in August, October and December 2010, respectively.  In July 2010, we acquired the Campo dos Ventos II wind farm and the Campo dos Ventos Complex in the state of Rio Grande do Norte, which operations are scheduled to start in 2013 and 2016, respecttively.  In 2011, Termoparaíba, CPFL Bio Formosa and CPFL Bio Buriti thermoelectric plants, as well as the fourth generating unit of Foz do Chapecó, started operations.  In February 2012, the construction of CPFL Bio Alvorada and CPFL Bio Coopcana biomass Thermoelectric Power Plants began, and operations are scheduled to start in 2013.  In 2012, we also completed the acquisition of Atlântica and Bons Ventos wind farms in March and June, respectively.  We also completed the acquisition of Ester Thermoelectric Power Plant on October 18, 2012.  Operations of Bio Ipê and Bio Pedra Thermoelectric Power Plants started on May 17, 2012 and May 31, 2012, respectively.  Tanquinho solar power plant and Salto Góes Small Hydroelectric Power Plants also started operations on November 27, 2012 and December 28, 2012, respectively.  Additionally, the Santa Clara wind farms are ready to start generating energy (although the construction of the Transmission line is not yet completed). We have been receiving revenues deriving from the Santa Clara wind farms, as contracted through the “2009 Auction Reserve Energy” (Leilão de Energia de Reserva), since July 2012. Operations of Macacos I and São Benedito wind farms are scheduled to start in 2013 and 2016, respectively.  As a result of our electric energy generation projects in progress, our Installed Capacity will reach 3,327 MW, which represents an increase of 12% by 2016

Most of the electricity we acquired in the Free Market was purchased by our commercialization subsidiary CPFL Brasil, which resells electricity to Free Consumers and other concessionaries and licensees (including our subsidiaries).  See “—The Brazilian Power Industry—The Free Market.”

Recoverable Cost Variations—Parcel A Costs

We use the CVA or the Parcel A account to recognize some of our costs in the distribution tariff, referred to as “Parcel A” Costs, that are beyond our control.  When these costs are higher than the forecasts used in setting tariffs, we are generally entitled to recover the difference through subsequent annual tariff adjustments.

Under IFRS, regulatory assets and liabilities cannot be recognized  because they do not comply with assets and liabilities requirements established by the Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements (Estrutura Conceitual para Elaboração e Apresentação das Demonstrações Contábeis) issued by IASB.  Therefore, we only account for rights or compensations when our captive clients were billed

The costs of electricity purchased from Itaipu are indexed to the U.S. dollar exchange variation.  If the U.S. dollar appreciates against the real, our costs will increase and, consequently, our income will decrease in the same period.  These losses will be offset in the future, when the next annual tariff adjustments occur.

 

59

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Operating Segments

As a result of our association with ERSA and the acquisition of Jantus’ shares in 2011, we have created a separate operating segment to segregate our activities relating to renewable energy sources.  Therefore, as of August 1, 2011, we switched to having four operating segments: distribution, conventional generation sources, renewable generation sources and commercialization.  As of January 1, 2012, we began to analyze the services segment on a segregated basis, therefore, as we mentioned in note 29 from our consolidated financial statements, we have presented  five operating segments: distribution, conventional generation sources, renewable generation sources, commercialization and services.  Because there is no available information on our renewable generation segment for the first half of 2011, the financial information relating to our renewable generation sources segment for the prior period are not comparable to 2011. Furthermore, because we have been analyzing our activities of commercialization and services separately, the 2011 information from both segment are presented separately for purposes of comparison. Therefore, the discussion below will focus on the distribution, generation (conventional and renewable sources), commercialization and services segments.

The profitability of our segments differs.  Our distribution segment reflects primarily sales to captive consumers and charges for the use of our distribution system (TUSD) by Free Consumers at prices determined by the regulatory authority.  The volume sold varies according to external factors such as weather, income level and economic growth.  This segment represents 82.3% of our net operating revenue, but its contribution to our net income is smaller.  In 2012, 69.9% of our net income was derived from our distribution activities (in 2011, was 71.0%)

Our generation (conventional and renewable), commercialization and services segments currently represent a small percentage of our net revenues:  8.8%, 8.5% and 0.3% in 2012, and 5.5%, 7.1% and 0.8% in 2011, respectively.  However, the contribution of our generation (conventional and renewable), commercialization and services segments to our net income was higher (28.2%, 8.1 and 2.1% in 2012, respectively).

Our conventional generation sources segment consists in substantial part of Hydroelectric Power Plants, and our renewable generation sources segment consists of wind farms, biomass thermoelectric projects and Small Hydroelectric Power Plants.  All of our generation sources require a high level of investment in fixed assets, and in the early years there is typically a high level of construction financing.  Once these projects became operational, they will result in higher margin (operating income as a percentage of revenue) than the distribution segment, but will also contribute to higher interest expenses and other financing costs.  For example, in 2012, our conventional generation  sources segment provided 39.6% of our operating income, but due to the relative significance of the financial expenses incurred to finance these projects, the segment’s contribution to net income was lower.  In 2012, 28.2% of our net income was derived from our generation activities.

We have been reporting our renewable generation sources segment according to IFRS rules since August 1, 2011, as a result of our association with ERSA and Jantus.  For this reason, we have no comparative financial information for the prior period before August 1, 2011, and discussion of results and operations relating to our renewable generation sources segment have been associated with discussion of results and operations of our conventional generation sources segment.  As of December 31, 2012, 15.2% of the property, plant and equipment in the renewable generation sources segment was under construction.

Until December 31, 2011, we presented our activities of commercialization and services segment together. Since January 1, 2012, we have been analyzing these activities separately. For this reason, the 2011 information is presented separately for purposes of maintaining comparability regarding the services segment

Our commercialization segment sells electricity to Free Consumers and other concessionaries or licensees.  In 2012, 8.5 (9,8% in 2011) of our net income was derived from our commercialization activities.

Our services segment offer our consumers a wide range of electricity-related services.  These services are designed to help consumers improve the efficiency, cost and reliability of the electric equipment they use. In 2012, 1.8% (0.6% in 2011) of our net income was derived from the services segment

60

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Our segments also purchase and sell electricity and value-added services to and from one another.  In particular, our generation (from conventional and renewable sources), commercialization and services segments sell electricity and provide services to our distribution segment.  In  our consolidated financial statements eliminate revenues and expenses that relate to sales from one subsidiary to another.  However, the analysis of results by segment would be inaccurate if the same eliminations were carried out with respect to sales between segments.  As a result, sales from one segment to another have not been eliminated in the discussion of results by segment below. 

We present below selected financial information of our five reportable segments as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012: 

 

Distribution

Conventional generation

sources

Renewable generation sources

Commercialization

Services

Other(*)

Elimination

Total

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Revenue

12,391,730

722,818

608,223

1,284,069

46,855

1,452

-

15,055,147

(-) Intersegment Revenues

22,138

890,104

210,260

602,332

124,968

-

(1,849,802)

-

Income from electric energy service

1,421,718

880,997

215,139

255,193

26,276

(28,210)

-

2,771,113

Financial income

558,130

46,178

56,461

39,389

4,777

15,397

-

720,332

Financial expense

(632,278)

(432,179)

(254,333)

(140,506)

8,475

(37,143)

-

(1,487,964)

Income before taxes

1,347,570

494,996

17,268

154,076

39,528

(49,957)

-

2,003,481

Income tax and social contribution

(469,081)

(148,567)

(9,256)

(52,000)

(12,856)

(54,987)

-

(746,747)

Net Income

878,489

346,430

8,011

102,075

26,672

(104,944)

-

1,256,734

Total Assets(**)

14,739,978

6,517,342

8,786,521

466,645

186,303

378,897

-

31,075,687

Capital Expenditures and other intangible assets

1,402,994

20,446

1,021,970

2,870

18,865

508

-

2,467,653

Depreciation and Amortization

(544,192)

(286,594)

(289,372)

(3,177)

(3,693)

(74)

-

(1,127,103)

 

 

Distribution

Conventional generation

sources

Renewable generation sources

Commercialization

Services

Other(*)

Elimination

Total

2011 (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Revenue

11,048,924

609,755

96,378

946,499

61,281

1,191

-

12,764,028

(-) Intersegment Revenues

16,831

839,029

75,513

623,556

74,572

-

(1,629,501)

-

Income from electric energy service

1,922,194

847,073

47,256

246,039

17,938

(29,953)

-

3,050,547

Financial income

492,584

80,617

56,924

69,768

6,134

55,373

-

761,400

Financial expense

(669,818)

(519,758)

(34,676)

(99,574)

(4,784)

(58,167)

-

(1,386,778)

Income before taxes

1,744,960

407,932

69,504

216,232

19,289

(32,747)

-

2,425,170

Income tax and social contribution

(592,528)

(112,592)

2,008

(68,430)

(7,258)

(22,096)

-

(800,896)

Net Income

1,152,432

295,339

71,513

147,802

12,031

(54,843)

-

1,624,273

Total Assets(**)

12,850,341

5,402,188

7,779,336

426,858

88,568

865,766

-

27,413,057

Capital Expenditures and other intangible assets

1,065,104

334,989

487,564

14,854

2,073

189

-

1,904,773

Depreciation and Amortization

(498,225)

(260,614)

(36,446)

(4,093)

(1,649)

(177)

-

(801,203)

 


(*)           Other – Refers basically to the CPFL Energia figures after eliminations of balances with related parties.

(**)         The goodwill created in an acquisition and recorded in CPFL Energia was allocated to the respective segments.

(1)             Includes the effects described in note 2.8 to our consolidated financial statements.

61

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

The segregated information by operating segment shown below is in accordance with the criteria established by Company Management, until 2011:

 

Distribution

Generation

Commercialization

Other(*)

Elimination

Total

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Revenue

12,391,730

1,331,041

1,330,924

1,452

-

15,055,147

(-) Intersegment Revenues

22,138

1,100,364

727,300

-

(1,849,802)

(0)

Income from electric energy service

1,421,718

1,096,136

281,469

(28,210)

-

2,771,113

Financial income

558,130

102,639

44,166

15,397

-

720,332

Financial expense

(632,278)

(686,512)

(132,031)

(37,143)

-

(1,487,964)

Income before taxes

1,347,570

512,264

193,604

(49,957)

-

2,003,481

Income tax and social contribution

(469,081)

(157,823)

(64,856)

(54,987)

-

(746,747)

Net Income

878,489

354,442

128,747

(104,944)

-

1,256,734

Total Assets(**)

14,739,978

15,303,864

652,948

378,897

-

31,075,687

Capital Expenditures and other intangible assets

1,402,994

1,042,416

21,735

508

-

2,467,653

Depreciation and Amortization

(544,192)

(575,967)

(6,870)

(74)

-

(1,127,103)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011 (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Revenue

11,048,924

706,133

1,007,780

1,191

-

12,764,028

(-) Intersegment Revenues

16,831

914,542

698,128

-

(1,629,501)

0

Income from electric energy service

1,922,194

894,329

263,977

(29,953)

-

3,050,547

Financial income

492,584

137,541

75,902

55,373

-

761,400

Financial expense

(669,818)

(554,435)

(104,358)

(58,167)

-

(1,386,778)

Income before taxes

1,744,960

477,436

235,521

(32,747)

-

2,425,170

Income tax and social contribution

(592,528)

(110,584)

(75,688)

(22,096)

-

(800,896)

Net Income

1,152,432

366,851

159,833

(54,843)

-

1,624,273

Total Assets(**)

12,850,341

13,181,524

515,426

865,766

-

27,413,057

Capital Expenditures and other intangible assets

1,065,104

822,553

16,927

189

-

1,904,773

Depreciation and Amortization

(498,225)

(297,060)

(5,742)

(177)

-

(801,203)

2010 (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Revenue

10,471,192

538,217

1,012,525

1,795

-

12,023,729

(-) Intersegment Revenues

13,904

650,571

766,922

-

(1,431,397)

-

Income from electric energy service

1,852,867

616,416

302,981

(32,949)

-

2,739,315

Financial income

398,656

53,725

22,389

90,981

-

565,751

Financial expense

(394,999)

(323,441)

(22,311)

(96,307)

-

(837,058)

Income before taxes

1,856,385

345,914

302,024

(36,315)

-

2,468,008

Income tax and social contribution

(632,961)

(88,731)

(95,840)

(35,899)

-

(853,431)

Net Income

1,223,424

257,183

206,184

(72,214)

-

1,614,577

Total Assets(**)

11,689,503

7,568,600

349,047

449,647

-

20,056,797

Capital Expenditures and other intangible assets

1,127,637

645,040

27,853

10

-

1,800,540

Depreciation and Amortization

(352,806)

(188,981)

(4,553)

(145,453)

-

(691,793)

 

 


(*)           Other – Refers basically to the CPFL Energia figures after eliminations of balances with related parties.

(**)         The goodwill created in an acquisition and recorded in CPFL Energia was allocated to the respective segments.

(1)             Includes the effects described in note 2.8 to our consolidated financial statements.

62

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

We also derive non‑material income at parent company level that is not related to or included in the results of our reportable segments.  General expenses and overhead are generally allocated to the relevant subsidiary and are reflected in the operating results of our reporting segments.  Other expenses incurred by the parent company that can be directly allocated to a specific segment, such as the posting of an intangible asset relating to a concession, and the amortization thereof, are also allocated to our reporting segments.

Brazilian Economic Conditions

All of our operations are in Brazil, and we are affected by general Brazilian economic conditions.  In particular, the general performance of the Brazilian economy affects demand for electricity, and inflation affects our costs and our margins.  The Brazilian economic environment has been characterized by significant variations in economic growth rates, with very low growth from 2001 through 2003 and an economic recovery since 2004.  This trend was interrupted by the international financial crisis in 2009.  In 2010, the Brazilian economic environment experienced strong growth as it recovered after the international financial crisis of 2008/2009.  In 2011, international economic trouble, specifically in the Euro Zone, was reflected in the reduced growth of the Brazilian economy.  In 2012, Brazilian economic activity continued to be affected by the unfavorable international scenario and industrial performance showed moderate results.  However, income and employment, favored by domestic market, presented good results in 2012.

The following table shows inflation, the change in gross domestic product (in reais) and the variation of the real  against the U.S. dollar for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008.

 

Year ended December 31,

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Inflation (IGP-M)(1)

7.8%

5.1%

11.3%

-1.7%

9.8%

Inflation (IPCA)(2)

5.8%

6.5%

5.9%

4.3%

5.9%

Growth (contraction) in gross domestic product (in reais

0.9%

2.7%

7.5%

-0.2%

5.1%

Depreciation (appreciation) of the real  vs. U.S. dollar

9.4%

12.6%

-4.3%

-25.5%

31.9%

Period-end exchange rate–US$1.00

R$2.044

R$1.876

R$1.666

R$1.741

R$2.337

Average exchange rate–US$1.00(3)

R$1.958

R$1.671

R$1.759

R$1.990

R$1.833

 


Source:  Fundação Getúlio Vargas, the  Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística and the Central Bank.

(1)           Inflation (IGP-M) is the general market price index measured by the Fundação Getúlio Vargas.

(2)           Inflation (IPCA) is a broad consumer price index measured by the Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística and the reference for inflation targets set forth by the CMN.

(3)           Represents the average of the commercial selling exchange rates on the last day of each month during the period.

63

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Inflation primarily affects our business by increasing operating costs and financial expenses to service our inflation-indexed debt instruments.  We are able to recover a portion of these increased costs through the Parcel A Cost recovery mechanism, but there is a delay in time between when the increased costs are incurred and when the increased revenues are received following our annual tariff adjustments.  The amounts owed to us under Parcel A are indexed to the variation of the SELIC rate until they passed through to our tariffs.

Depreciation of the real  increases the cost of servicing our foreign currency denominated debt and the cost of purchasing electricity from the Itaipu power plant, a Hydroelectric Facility that is one of our major suppliers and that adjusts electricity prices based in part on its U.S. dollar costs.

Some external factors may significantly affect our businesses depending on the category of consumers:

·         Residential and Commercial Consumers.  These classes are highly affected by weather conditions and income distribution.  Elevated temperatures and increases in income levels cause an increased demand for electricity and, therefore, increase our sales.

·         Industrial consumers.  Consumption for industrial consumers is related to economic growth, amongst other factors, correlated mostly to industrial production.  During periods of financial crisis, this category suffers the strongest impact.

Results of Operations—2012 compared to 2011

 

Net Operating Revenues

Compared to 2011, net operating revenues increased 17.9% in 2012, to R$15,055 million.  This includes revenues relating to the construction of concession infrastructure in the amount of R$1,352 million, which does not affect results, due to corresponding costs in the same amount.  The increase in operating revenue primarily reflected higher revenues from the distribution companies, due to the increased amount sold and tariff changes for captive consumers and TUSD revenue from Free Consumers.

The following discussion describes changes in our net operating revenues by destination and by segment, based on the items comprising our gross revenues.

Sales by Destination

 Sales to final consumers

Compared to 2011, our gross operating revenues from sales to Final Consumers increased 6.8% in 2012, to R$15,914 million. Our gross operating revenues reflect primarily sales to captive consumers at concession areas from our eight distribution subsidiaries, and are subject to tariff adjustment as shown below:

The tariffs of the distribution companies are adjusted every year, in percentages specific to each category of consumer.  The month in which the tariff adjustment becomes effective varies.  The adjustment at the largest subsidiaries occurred in April (CPFL Paulista), June (RGE) and October (CPFL Piratininga).  In 2012, energy prices increased by an average of 3.0%, mainly due to the tariff changes at the following distributors: CPFL Paulista (2.89%), RGE (3.38%) and CPFL Piratininga (5.50%). See note 25 to our audited consolidated financial statements. Average prices for Final Consumers in 2012 were higher for all consumer categories:

·         Industrial and commercial consumers.  With respect to captive consumers (which represent 78.8% of the total amount sold to this category in our consolidated statements), average prices increased 4.1% and 3.2%, respectively, due to the annual tariff adjustment.  With respect to Free Consumers, the average price for the industrial consumers increased 2.0%, while the average price for the commercial consumers decreased 2.8%, respectively.  The effect of the decrease in the average price for the commercial consumers was due to discounts on the contracts for the use of our distribution system (TUSD) by Free Consumers and other discounts for certain contracts.

64

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

·         Residential consumers.  Average prices increased 3.7%, mainly due to tariff adjustments.

Economic dynamism in 2012 led to increases in volume sold by 6.9% and 7.0%, respectively and consequent sales increases of 10.9% and 9.8%, respectively, for residential and commercial consumers, which represent 63% of our sales to Final Consumers, driven by the continuing high level of wage earnings and a robust labor market (increased income and employment, access to credit, sales of electronics and appliances and retail sales).  The volume sold to industrial consumers decreased 1.2%, reflecting a drop of 9.7% in sales to captive Final Consumers, which was partially offset by an increase of 20.1% in sales in the Free Market. Sales to the industrial consumers, which represents 25.6% of our sales to Final Consumers, also showed a drop due to the migration of consumers to the Free Market and the weaker overall performance of the industrial sector nationwide (industrial GDP dropped by 0,8% in 2012), in turn due to the direct impact of the global economic slowdown.    Industrial consumers in our distribution concession areas that buy from other suppliers in the Free Market also pay us a fee for the use of our network, and this revenue is reflected in our financial statements under “Other Operating Revenues”.

 Sales to wholesalers

Compared to 2011, our gross operating revenues from sales to wholesalers increased 74.4% (or R$966 million) to R$2,264 million in 2012 (10.6% of gross operating revenues), due mainly to (i) the growth in sales of electricity from CPFL Renováveis (R$562 million), (ii) increased sales of electricity to the other concessionaires and permissionaires by our generation and commercialization subsidiaries (R$273 million), and (iii) increased sales in the CCEE (R$122 million) due to increased average prices.

 Other operating revenues

Compared to 2011, our other gross operating revenues increased 15.0% (or R$405 million) in 2012 to R$3,108 million (20.6% of our net operating revenues), mainly due to (i) the increase of 19.6% (or R$222 million) in revenue from building concession infrastructure, as a result of investments in improving and expanding distribution, (ii) the increase of 6.9% (R$91 million) in TUSD revenue for making the electric grid available, by of the migration of consumers to the Free Market, (iii) and the increase of R$26 million with reference to recording the low-income subsidy provided with funding from the CDE.

Deductions from operating revenues

We deduct certain taxes and industry charges from our gross operating revenue to calculate net revenue.  The state-level value-added tax (ICMS), federal PIS and COFINS taxes, and the research and development and energy efficiency programs (regulatory charges) are calculated based on gross operating revenue, while other regulatory charges vary depending on the regulatory effect reflected in our tariffs.  These deductions represented 29.7% of our gross operating revenue in 2012 and 32.3% in 2011.  Compared to 2011, these deductions increased 4.3% (or R$265 million) to R$6,367 million in 2012, mainly due to the increase of: (i) 7.1% (or R$211 million) in ICMS, mainly due to  the increase of our billed supply, (ii) 5.1% (or R$81 million) in PIS/COFINS, basically due to the increase of our Gross operating revenues, offset by the effect of booking credits to amortization in the amount of R$113 million (in 2011 the PIS and COFINS tax credits on amortization were recorded under Depreciation and Amortization Expenses, and in 2012 are recorded as Deductions from Operating Revenue for better accounting classification), (iii) partially offset by the net effect of the decrease of 1.7% (or R$27 million) in regulatory charges.  See explanatory note 25 to our financial statements.

Sales by segment

 Distribution 

Compared to 2011, our net operating revenues from our distribution segment increased 12.2% (or R$1,348 million) to R$12,414 million in 2012.  This increase was mainly due to (i) increase of R$829 million due to an increase of 4.2% in average tariffs charged and a 1.6% increase in the volume sold, (ii) a 6.6% increase (or R$89 million) in TUSD collections from Free Consumers, (iv) a 19.6% increase (or R$222 million) in revenue from construction of concession infrastructure due to investments in improving and expanding distribution, (iv) increase of R$103 million resulting from sales in the CCEE due to the increased average prices, and (v) decrease of 6.3% (or R$80 million) in the CCC and CDE charges (which was partially offset by an increase of 5.6%, or R$260 million, in taxes on gross operating revenues).

65

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 Generation (conventional and renewable sources)

Net operating revenues from our generation segment in 2012 amounted to R$2,431 million (R$1,613 million from conventional generation sources and R$818 million from renewable generation sources), an increase of 50.0% (or R$811 million) compared to R$1,621 million in 2011.  This increase was mainly due to (i) the increase of R$647 million resulting from sales  of CPFL Renováveis; (ii) increase of 6.3% (or R$48 million) in sales by our conventional generation sources to our distribution companies, mainly due to price adjustments and (iii) due to the dispatch in 2012 of Termonordeste and Termoparaíba thermoeletric power plants (EPASA) by the ONS, resulting in an increase in our net operating revenue of R$81 million.

 Commercialization 

Net operating revenues from our commercialization segment in 2012 amounted to R$1,886 million, an increase of 20.1% (or R$316 million) compared to R$1,570 million in 2011.  The increase was mainly due to the 7.8% increase in the volume sold and the 11.9% increase in average prices.

 Services 

Net operating revenues from our services segment in 2012 amounted to R$172 million, an increase of 26.5% (or R$36 million) compared to R$136 million in 2011.  The increase was mainly due to (i) the increased sales by CPFL Serviços (both to third parties and to companies within the CPFL group), reflect from an effort to increase the range of electricity-related services, and (ii) the commencement of operations of CPFL Nect 8 in March 2012.

Income from Electric Energy Service

Cost of Electric Energy

Electricity purchased for resale.  Compared to 2011, our costs to purchase energy for resale increased 25.4% (or R$1,245 million) in 2012, to R$6,152 million (50.1% of our total operating costs and operating expenses), mainly due to the increase of  greater exposure and variation in the settlement price “PLD”, tariff adjustments and the exchange rate variations in the purchase of Itaipu .

Electricity network usage charges.  Compared to 2011, our charges for use of the Transmission and distribution system increased 19.8% (or R$261 million) to R$1,574 million in 2012, mainly due to the increase of (i) R$143 million in the Basic Network charges, resulting from price changes from the Transmission companies, (ii) R$66 million in the ESS, and (iii) R$51 million in the EER, both regulatory charges.

Other costs and operating expenses

Our other costs and operating expenses comprise our operating cost, services rendered to third parties, costs related to construction of concession infrastructure, sales expenses, general and administrative expenses and other operating expenses.

Compared to 2011, our other costs and operating expenses increased 30.5% (or R$1,066 million) to R$4,558 million in 2012, mainly due to the following important events: (i) a R$222 million increase in infrastructure construction costs for investments in improving and expanding distribution; (ii) a R$99 million increase, net of PIS/COFINS credits, in EPASA’s fuel consumption for power generation; (iii) a R$225 million increase in depreciation and amortization expenses, basically due to the effect of CPFL Renováveis (R$142 million), the change in accounting for the PIS/COFINS credit (R$55 million) (see details in our discussion of deductions from operating revenue), and to the increase in amortization and depreciation of new investments, offset in part by the change in the depreciation rates stipulated by the ANEEL in 2012 (R$21 million)  - see explanatory note 12 and 13 to our financial statements; (iv) a R$93 million increase in the provision for doubtful accounts arising basically from receivables from consumers at our distribution companies; (v) a R$128 million increase in legal, judicial and indemnity expenses; (vi) a R$50 million increase in the write-off charge relating to physical inventory of concession infrastructure assets as a result of our subsidiaries’ CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga, CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Jaguari, CPFL Leste Paulista, CPFL Sul Paulista, CPFL Mococa and RGE (R$45 million) implementation of ANEEL Resolution No. 367 of June 2, 2009 (Manual de Controle Patrimonial do Setor Elétrico - MCPSE); and (vii) a R$67 million decrease in net revenue recognized from a private pension entity as a consequence of the results of actuarial calculations for 2012. 


8 CPFL Nect was formerly Chumpitaz Serviços S.A.

66

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Income from Electric Energy Service

Compared to 2011, our income from electric energy service decreased 9.2% (or R$279 million) to R$2,771 million in 2012, due to an increase of 26.5% (or R$2,571 million) in operating expenses and costs of electric energy services, offset by an increase of 17.9% (or R$2,291 million) in our net revenues.

Income from Electric Energy Service by Segment

Distribution

Compared to 2011, income from electric energy service from our distribution segment decreased 26.0% (or R$500 million) to R$1,422 million in 2012. Despite of the increase of 12.2% (or R$1,348 million) in net operating revenues, the cost and operational expenses increased 20.2% (or R$1,849 million), which in resulted a decreased in the income from electric energy service.  The mainly variations on cost and operational expenses were:

·         Electricity costs:  compared to 2011, electricity costs increased 19.8% (or R$1,248), to R$7,538 million in 2012.  The cost of energy purchased for resale increased 20.0%, (or R$1,009 million), reflecting an increase of average prices, arising from the greater exposure and variation in the settlement price “PLD”, tariff adjustments and the exchange rate variations in the purchase from Itaipu. However, this increase is passed along through tariffs, either in the 2012 or in the 2013 tariff adjustment.  Charges for use of the transmission and distribution system increased 19.1% (or R$239 million), mainly due to (i) an increase of R$126 million in basic network charges, (ii) an increase of R$66 million in the ESS, and (iii) an increase of R$51 million in the EER.  A significant part of the increase in these costs was not included in the distribution tariffs and will be passed along in the next tariff adjustment.

·         Other costs and operating expenses.  Compared to 2011, our other costs and operating expenses for the distribution segment increased 21.1% (or R$601 million), to R$3,454 million in 2012, mainly due to (i) an increase of R$100 million in the provision for doubtful accounts arising from receivables from consumers; (ii) an increase of R$138 million in legal, judicial and indemnity expenses; (iii) R$45 million of losses upon sale, deactivation and other non-current assets mainly due to implementation of the asset control manual – ANEEL Resolution No. 367/2009; (iv) a R$66 million decrease in net revenue from a private pension entity as a consequence of actuarial calculations for 2012, (v) a R$222 million increase in infrastructure construction costs for investments in improving and expanding distribution (without impact on the net result, as discussed above), offset by decrease of 5.7% (R$32 million) in expenses with personnel due to the retirement program occurred in 2011 (R$45 million). 

Generation (conventional and renewable sources)

Compared to 2011, income from electric energy service from our generation segment increased 22.6% (or R$202 million) to R$1,096 million in 2012 (R$881 million from conventional generation sources and R$215 million from renewable generation sources).  This increase was mainly due to 50.0% (or R$811 million) growth in net operating revenues, which was partially offset by (i) R$479 million of increase from costs and operating expenses from CPFL Renováveis, (ii) a R$99 million increase in fuel expense due to the dispatch of a thermoelectric plant in the conventional generation segment, and (iii) a R$33 million increase in energy purchased, mainly due to droughts in the basins where our Hydroelectric Power Plants are located, resulting in a significant decrease in the energy we generated, leading us to purchase energy in the MRE, therefore increasing in 140.1% the volume of the energy we purchased.

67

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Commercialization

Compared to 2011, income from electric energy service from our commercialization segment increased 3.7% (or R$9 million), to R$255 million in 2012.  Despite the 20.1% (or R$316 million) increase in net operating revenues, costs and expenses increased 23.2% (or R$307 million) mainly due to a 24.4% (or R$312 million) increase in the cost of electricity, due to an increase of 7.7% in the volume of energy purchased and the 15.5% increase in the average price.

Services

Compared to 2011, income from electric energy service from our service segment increased 46.5% (or R$8 million), to R$26 million in 2012. This increase was mainly due to the 26.5% (R$36 million) increase in our net operating revenues, offset by the 23.4% (or R$28 million) increase in other costs and operating expenses, mainly due to expenses with personnel due to an increase of 45% in the number of employees hired to expand our activities).

Net Income

Net Financial Expense

Compared with 2011, our net financial expense increased 22.7% (or R$142 million), from R$625 million in 2011 to R$768 million in 2012, mainly due to: (i) a decrease of 5.4% (or R$41 million) in our financial income, results of (i) a decrease of R$145 million in revenue from our financial investments, partially offset by (ii) an increase of R$96 million in the financial asset update; and  an increase of 7.3% (R$101 million) in our financial expense, mainly due to: (i) an increase of R$93 million in the debt charges and monetary and aexchange variations, composed of an increase of R$239 million from CPFL Renováveis, arising from new investments and acquisition, and by a decrease of R$141 million due to a reduction od CDI and TJLP, and (ii) an increase of expense from interest and fines of R$28 million arising from network incorporation payment in the subsidiary CPFL Paulista.  At December 31, 2012, we had R$14,691 million in debt denominated in reais, which accrued both interest and inflation correction based on a variety of Brazilian indexes and money market rates.  We also had the equivalent of R$2,435 million of debt denominated in U.S. dollars.  In order to reduce the risk of exchange losses with respect to these U.S. dollars-denominated debts and variations in interest rates, we have a policy of using derivatives to switch the risk to CDI index variation. Certain of ours subsidiaries opted to measure debts for which we have fully tied derivative instruments. Compared with 2011, the balances of our derivatives instruments resulted a decreased 28.5% (or R$73 million), to R$183 million in 2012 - see explanatory note 33 to our financial statements  The average CDI index variation rate posted an increase of 8.4% in 2012, compared to 11.6% in 2011, and the TJLP remained practically stable at 5.8% in 2012, compared to 6.0% in 2011.

Income and Social Contribution Taxes

Our net charge for income and social contribution taxes decreased from R$801 million in 2011 to R$747 million in 2012.  The effective rate of 37.3% on pretax income in 2012 was little higher to the official rate of 34%. 

Net Income

Compared to 2011, and due to the factors discussed above, net income decreased 22.6% (or R$368 million), to R$1,257 million in 2012.

Net Income by Segment

In 2012, 69.9% of our net income derived from our distribution segment, 28.2% from our generation segment (27.6% from conventional generation and 0.6% from renewable generation), 8.1% from our commercialization segment and 2.1% from our services segment. 

68

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Distribution

Compared to 2011, net income from our distribution segment decreased 23.8%, or (R$274 million), to R$878 million in 2012, mainly due to the decrease of 26.0% (R$500 million) in income from electric energy service, partially offset by decreased of R$103 million in net financial expenses mainly due to a reduction in the remuneration rates applicable to the financial asset of concession´s (increase of R$91 million) and a decrease of R$123 million in income and social contribution taxes.

Generation (conventional and renewable sources)

Compared to 2011, net income from our generation segment decreased 3.4% (or R$12 million) to R$354 million in 2012 (R$346 million from conventional generation and R$8 million from renewable generation), reflecting a 22.6% (or R$202 million) increase in income from electric energy service (R$34 million from conventional genereation and R$168 million from renewable genereation), offset by an increase of R$167 million in net financial expense (R$220 million net expense from the renewable energy segment and R$53 million net revenue from conventional generation) and an increase of R$47 million in income and social contribution taxes.

Commercialization

Compared to 2011, net income from our commercialization segment decreased 30.9% (or R$46 million), to R$102 million in 2012, reflect from the increase of R$9 million in the income from electric service and the decrease in expense of income and social contribution taxes in R$16 million, offset by an increase of R$71 million in net financial expenses.

Services

Compared to 2011, net income from our services segment increase 121.7% (or R$15 million), to R$27 million in 2012, reflecting an increase of R$8 million in income from electric energy service, increase of R$12 million in net financial revenue, offset by an increase of R$6 million in income and social contribution taxes.

Results of Operations—2011 compared to 2010

In 2011, our performance progressed significantly, specially reflecting the current growth cycle in Brazil; the growth potential of the Brazilian internal market, which is reflected in the increase in the consumption of energy in our distribution concession areas, and the results of our strategy of expanding and diversifying our business.

Net Operating Revenues

Our net operating revenues were R$12,764 million in 2011, a 6.2% increase compared to 2010.  Excluding revenues relating to the construction of concession infrastructure (which does not affect the result due to corresponding costs in the same amount), net operating revenues would be R$11,634 million, a 6.0%, or R$654 million, increase.  The increase in our net operating revenues primarily reflected higher revenues deriving from our distribution companies, which had increased sales to captive consumers (and, consequently, higher TUSD collections) and tariff adjustments.

The following discussion describes changes in our net operating revenues by destination and by segment, based on the items comprising our gross revenues.

Sales by Destination

 Sales to final consumers

Our gross operating revenues from sales to Final Consumers were R$14,907 million in 2011, a 7.0% increase compared to 2010.  Tariffs are adjusted each year, and the month in which the tariff adjustment takes effect varies, with the increases in the largest subsidiaries taking effect in April (CPFL Paulista), June (RGE) and October (CPFL Piratininga).  Average prices to Final Consumers in 2011 were higher in all  consumer categories:

·         Industrial and Commercial Consumers.  For industrial and commercial consumers that are captive consumers (which represent 81.2% of the total volume sold to these categories), average prices increased by 4.8% and 4.3%, respectively, due to annual tariff adjustments.  For those that are Free Consumers, average prices increased by 18.2% and 16.7%, respectively.

69

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

·         Residential Consumers.  Average prices increased by 5.2% mainly due to tariff adjustments.

Our increased sales in 2011 reflected the economic strength of our residential and commercial consumers.  Our industrial activities exhibited more modest economic growth, a reflection of the lower growth rate of industrial GDP (1.6%) as compared to total GDP (2.7%).  Volumes sold to residential and commercial consumers increased 4.9% and 5.9%, respectively.  Volumes sold to industrial consumers decreased 4.5%, reflecting a decrease of 7.5% in sales to captive Final Consumers, which was partially offset by a 8.7% increase in sales in the Free Market.  Industrial customers in our distribution concession areas who purchase from other suppliers in the Free Market also pay us a fee for the use of our network, and this revenue is reflected in our financial statements under “Other Operating Revenues.”

 Sales to wholesalers

Our gross operating revenues from sales to wholesalers were R$1,298 million in 2011 (6.9% of our gross operating revenues), an increase of 8.5% compared to 2010.  The increase was due to a 11.0% increase in the volume sold, partially offset by a 2.2% decrease in average prices.

 Other operating revenues

Our other gross operating revenues were R$1,572 million in 2011 (12.3% of our net operating revenues), compared to R$1,387 million in 2010.  The increase was mainly due to the increase of TUSD collections from Free Consumers.

Deductions from operating revenues

We deduct certain taxes and regulatory charges from our gross operating revenues to calculate our net revenues.  One of these taxes is the value-added tax, or ICMS, levied by Brazilian states, and PIS/COFINS taxes levied by the Brazilian federal government.  These deductions amounted to 32.3% of our gross operating revenues in 2011 and 31.5% in 2010.  Most of these taxes and charges are based on the amount of gross operating revenues, while others vary depending on regulatory effects reflected in our tariffs.  See note 25 to our consolidated financial statements.

Sales by segment

 Distribution 

Net operating revenues from our distribution segment in 2011 amounted to R$11,066 million, an increase of 5.5% compared to R$10,485 million in 2010.  Excluding revenues relating to the construction of concession infrastructure (which was totally offset by construction costs), net operating revenues would be R$9,936 million, a 5.2%, or R$495 million, increase.  This increase was mainly due to (i) tariff adjustments, which resulted in an average increase of 6.4% of billed revenues and a 3.1% increase in the volume sold (R$858 million), and (ii) a 17.6% increase, or R$200 million, in TUSD collections from Free Consumers, which were partially offset by (i) an increase of R$295 million in taxes on gross operating revenues, and (ii) an increase of R$197 million in the CCC and CDE charges.

 Generation 

Net operating revenues from our generation segment in 2011 amounted to R$1,621 million, an increase of 36.3% (R$432 million) compared to R$1,189 million in 2010.  This increase was mainly due to the commencement of operations of Foz do Chapecó Hydroelectric Power Plant in October 2010 and Termonordeste and Termoparaíba Thermoelectric Power Plants in December 2010 and January 2011, respectively, and the consolidation of CPFL Energias Renováveis in August 2011.

70

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 Commercialization and Services

Net operating revenues from our commercialization and services segment in 2011 amounted to R$1,706 million, a decrease of 4.1% compared to R$1,779 million in 2010.  The decrease was mainly due to the 13.3% decrease in the volume sold, which was partially offset by the 11.9% increase in average prices.

Income from Electric Energy Service

Cost of Electric Energy

Electricity purchased for resale.  Our costs to purchase electricity were R$4,907 million in 2011 (50.5% of our total operating costs and operating expenses).  The cost was 2.8% (R$143 million) lower than in 2010, primarily due to a 2.9% decrease in the volume of electricity we purchased once Foz do Chapecó and the EPASA plants commenced operations in October 2010 and December 2010, respectively.

The cost of electricity purchased from Itaipu by our distribution companies was 3.6% (R$37 million) lower in 2011 as compared with 2010, due to the stability of the amount purchased and a reduction of prices.  The average price for electricity purchased from Itaipu, which represented 21.3% of the total volume we purchased in 2011, was on average 3.8% lower in 2011 than in 2010, mainly due to the 5.0% decrease in the US dollar average exchange rate in 2011.

Costs to purchase electricity from other generation facilities were 2.6% (R$119 million) lower in 2011 as compared to 2010 due to a 1.1% increase in the average prices, which was offset by a 3.7% decrease in the volume of electricity sold at these facilities.

Electricity network usage charges.  Our costs for electricity network usage charges were R$1,314 million in 2011.  This was 12.1% (R$141 million) higher than in 2010 mainly due to an increase of R$120 million in the Basic Network usage charges, resulting from the commencement of operations of Foz do Chapecó and the EPASA plants in October 2010 and December 2010, respectively.

Other costs and operating expenses

Our other costs and operating expenses comprise our operating cost, services rendered to third parties, sales expenses, general and administrative expenses and other operating expenses, excluding costs related to construction of concession infrastructure.

Our other costs and operating expenses were R$2,363 million in 2011, a 17.1% (R$344 million) increase from 2010.  This was primarily due to the following nonrecurring events (i) implementation of our early retirement program in 2011, in the aggregate amount of R$51 million, aiming at potential future gains; (ii) reversion of reserves relating to PIS/COFINS taxes on sector charges of CPFL Paulista in 2010, in the amount of R$40 million; (iii) commencement of operations of Foz do Chapecó and the EPASA plants, and consolidation of CPFL Energias Renováveis in October 2010, December 2010 and August 2011, respectively (R$86 million); (iv) non-operating revenues deriving from the sale of real estate in the city of Santos in 2010 (R$11 million); and (v) increase in ENERCAN’s reserves for contingencies relating to taxes on services (ISS) (R$10 million).  Excluding these nonrecurring events, the increase in our other operating costs and operating expenses would be R$144 million, or 7.2%, which mainly reflects inflation adjustments.

Income from Electric Energy Service

Our income from electric energy service was R$3,051 million in 2011.  This was 11.4% (R$311 million) higher than in 2010 due to a 6.2% (R$740 million) increase in our net revenues, as well as a 4.6% (R$429 million) increase in operating expenses and electric energy service costs.

 

71

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Income from Electric Energy Service by Segment

Distribution

Operating income from our distribution segment in 2011 amounted to R$1,922 million, an increase of 3.7% compared with 2010.  Our operating income from the segment reflected the 5.5% increase in our net revenue, which was partially offset by:

·         Electricity costs:  Our electricity costs were R$6,290 million, a 4.4% increase compared to 2010.  This reflects an increase of 2.1% in the volume of electricity purchased by us in 2011 compared to 2010, and an increase of 2.3% in the average prices due to energy prices adjustments.  However, this increase does not significantly affect our operating income since it is reflected in the 2011 tariffs.

·         Other costs and operating expenses.  Our other costs and operating expenses (other than electricity utility service costs) for the distribution segment amounted to R$973 million, an increase of 20.0% compared to 2010.  This increase was primarily due to (i) salary increases resulting from collective bargaining agreements negotiated in 2010 and 2011, (ii) implementation of our early retirement program in 2011, (iii) increase in costs with third-party service providers, and (iv) increase in reserves for contingencies relating to legal procedures.

Generation

Operating income from our generation segment in 2011 amounted to R$895 million, an increase of 45.3% compared to 2010.  This increase reflects the 36.3% increase in net revenues and the 26.7% in other costs and operating expenses.  The main reason for the increase in operating income from the segment was the commencement of operations of Foz do Chapecó Hydroelectric Power Plant in October 2010 and Termonordeste and Termoparaíba Thermoelectric Power Plants in December 2010 and January 2011, respectively.  The commencement of operations of these plants also contributed to an increase of R$107 million in depreciation and amortization expenses, considering the effects of the consolidation of CPFL Energias Renováveis.

Commercialization and Services

Operating income from our commercialization and services segment in 2011 amounted to R$264 million, a decrease of 12.9% (R$39 million) compared to 2010.  This decrease was mainly due to the 4.1% decrease, or R$74 million, in net revenues, and the increase of R$29 million in other operating costs, mainly due to the expansion of our activities relating to services.  The decrease in net revenues and the increase in other operating costs was partially offset by a 4.7% (R$63 million) decrease in electricity costs (13.2% decrease in the volume of electricity purchased by us, partially offset by the 9.8% increase in the average price of electricity).

Net Income

Net Financial Expense

Our net financial expense was R$625 million in 2011, compared to R$271 million in 2010.  The R$354 million increase is mainly due to (i) an increase in our level of indebtedness and higher financial indexes; (ii) a decrease of capitalized borrowing costs due to the commencement of operations of CPFL Bionergia (in August 2010), Foz do Chapecó Hydroelectric Power Plant (in October 2010) and Termonordeste and Termoparaíba Thermoelectric Power Plants (in December 2010 and January 2011, respectively), through EPASA; (iii) decrease of R$19 million in monetary adjustment of asset financial concession; and (iv) the consolidation of CPFL Energias Renováveis.  These effects were partially offset by a R$200 million increase in our income from financial investments revenues due to higher cash and cash equivalents average balances.

At December 31, 2011, we had R$11,857 million in debt denominated in reais, which accrued both interest and inflation correction based on a variety of Brazilian indexes and money market rates.  We also had the equivalent of R$1,751 million of debt denominated in U.S. dollars.  In order to reduce the risk of exchange losses with respect to these U.S. dollars-denominated debts, we entered into long‑term currency swaps indexed to the CDI rate for a significant portion of this debt.  The average CDI index variation rate posted an increase of 11.6% in 2011 when compared to 9.8% in 2010, and the TJLP remained stable in 6.0% in 2010 and 2011.

72

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Income and Social Contribution Taxes

We recorded a net charge of R$801 million for income and social contribution taxes in 2011, compared to R$853 million in 2010.  Our effective tax rate of 33.0% on pretax income in 2011 was approximately equal to the combined statutory rate of 34.0%.

Net Income

Due to the factors mentioned above, our net income was R$1,624 million in 2011, a slight increase of 0.6%, or R$10 million, compared to 2010.

Net Income by Segment

In 2011, 71.0% of our net income was derived from our distribution segment, 22.7% from our generation segment and 9.8% from our commercialization and services segment.  Our other non‑reportable segments represented a net loss of 3.4%. 

Distribution

Net income from our distribution segment in 2011 amounted to R$1,153 million, a decrease of 5.8%, or R$ 71 million, compared with 2010.  The decrease in this segment reflected mainly the R$180 million increase in net financial expenses due to higher indebtedness, which was partially offset by a decrease in income taxes.

Generation

Net income from our generation segment in 2011 amounted to R$368 million, a 43.1% increase compared with 2010, which reflects the commencement of operation of Foz do Chapecó and the EPASA plants, and the consolidation of CPFL Energias Renováveis in October 2010, December 2010 and August 2011, respectively.  This increase was mainly due to the 36.3% increase in net revenues, which was partially offset by a R$147 million increase in net financial expenses due to new financings.

Commercialization and Services

Net income from our commercialization and services segment in 2011 amounted to R$160 million, a decrease of 22.5%, or R$46 million.  The decrease in this segment reflected the (i) R$39 million decrease in operating income, (ii) R$29 million increase in net financial expenses due to higher indebtedness, which was partially offset by lower income taxes (R$20 million).

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

On December 31, 2012, our working capital reflected a superavit (excess of current assets over current liabilities) of R$437 million.  The main cause of this superavit was arising from our operating cash generation and credits from consumers, offset by the outstanding debt due in the next 12 months (including accrued interest) and by obligations with our suppliers and other accounts payable.

 

Sources of Funds

Our main sources of funds derive from our operating cash generation and financings.

73

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Cash Flow

Our net cash provided by operating activities was R$ 2,144 million in 2012, compared to R$ 2,489 million in 2011. The reduction of R$ 345 million primarily reflected (i) an increase of R$ 192 million of net income adjusted for the reconciliation of net cash, which is primarily related to depreciation and amortization, allowance for doubtful accounts, the gain in pension plan costs and losses on the write-off of noncurrent assets, (ii) reduction in the reduction of operating liabilities, primarily due to taxes and contributions in the amount of R$ 301 million, (iii) increase in consumers, concessionaires and licensees in the amount of R$ 477 million, basically due to the increase in sales (month billing compared December, 2012 with December, 2011), as well as an increase of R$ 170 million in accounting for unbilled offset by (iv) a reduction of R$ 172 million of escrow deposits and R$ 62 million in taxes paid.

Net cash provided by operating activities was R$2,489 million in 2011, as compared to R$2,029 million in 2010.  The increase mainly reflected an increase in net income and an increase in the adjustment to reconcile income to cash, mainly related to interest and monetary restatement, which was partially offset by an increase in deposits in escrow.

Our net cash for financing activities was R$ 1,002 million in 2012 from R$ 1,136 million of cash generated in 2011. This reduction of R$ 134 million due mainly to events in 2011 such as: (i) debt refinancing, (ii) issuance of debentures, especially those made by subsidiary CPFL Brasil to fund the acquisition of Jantus (through our subsidiary CPFL Renováveis), (iii) various borrowings by our subsidiaries being the highlight for the subsidiaries CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga, RGE, CPFL Geração, CPFL Sul Paulista, CPFL Leste Paulista, CPFL CPFL Mococa and CPFL Jaguari, that  received approval for funding currency foreign working capital, partially offset by  (iv) an increase of R$166 million in dividend payments.

Net cash generated by financing activities was R$1,136 million in 2011 compared to net cash of R$152 million disbursed in 2010.  This increase is mainly due to new fund raisings, net of payment of maturing debts and issuance of debentures, especially by our subsidiary CPFL Brasil to finance the acquisition of Jantus (through our subsidiary CPFL Energias Renováveis).

 

Indebtedness

The following table sets forth our current and noncurrent liabilities (in millions) for the year ended December 31, 2012:

 

2012

 

Current

Noncurrent

 

 

 

Secured debt

1,198

6,011

Unsecured debt

3,995

11,464

Total

5,193

17,475

 

Our total indebtedness increased R$3,518 million, or 25.9%, from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2012, mainly as result of:

·         debenture issuances in the total amount of R$1,858 million, by CPFL Paulista (R$660 million), CPFL Piratininga (R$110 million) and RGE (R$500 million) to refinance debt maturing in 2012/2013 and reinforce working capital, and by CPFL Renováveis (R$588 million), to finance the acquisition of Santa Luzia and Bons Ventos;

·         loan from BNDES in the amount of R$1,137 million to fulfill the biannual investment plan for our distribution subsidiaries, through the National Equipment Financing Fund (Fundo para Financiamento e Aquisição de Máquinas e Equipamentos Industriais–FINAME) and Financing and Enterprises (Financiamento e Empreendimentos–FINEM), as well as to fulfill the investment for renewable generation subsidiaries;

74

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

·         fundraising in the amount of R$426 million in dollar-denominated debt at the group’s eight distribution companies, including R$223 million at RGE, R$21 million at CPFL Sul Paulista, R$20 million at CPFL Santa Cruz, R$64 million at CPFL Piratininga, R$49 million at CPFL Paulista, R$25 million at CPFL Leste Paulista, R$11 million at CPFL Mococa and R$13 million at CPFL Jaguari to reinforce working capital;

The main purpose of these financings will be to: (i) finance the investments of our distribution companies and (ii) invest in our renewable energy generation segment.

In 2013 and 2014 we expect to continue to take advantage of the financing opportunities offered by the market through issuing debentures and debt for working capital both internally and externally, and those offered by the government through lines of financing provided by BNDES, to expand and modernize the electric system, to undertake new investments in the generation segment and to be prepared for possible consolidation in the sector.

Moreover, fundraising seeks to maintain the liquidity of the group and a good debt profile through extending the average maturity of the debt and reducing its cost.

Terms of Outstanding Debt

Total debt outstanding at December 31, 2012 (including accrued interest) was R$17,126 million.  Of the total amount, approximately R$2,435 million, or 14.2%, was denominated in U.S. dollar.  We have entered into swap agreements in order to reduce our exposure to exchange rates that arises from part of these obligations.  The amount of R$2,133 million of our total outstanding debt is due in 12 months.

Our major categories of indebtedness are as follows:

·         BNDES.  At December 31, 2012, we had R$6,042 million outstanding under a number of facilities provided through BNDES.  These loans are denominated in reais.  The most significant part of these loans relates to (a) loans to our generation subsidiaries Foz do Chapecó, BAESA, CERAN, ENERCAN, EPASA and CPFL Renováveis (R$4,451 million), and (b) financing of investment programs of our distribution subsidiaries, primarily CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga and RGE (R$1,536 million).  We also had financings relating to working capital in the amount of R$37 million.

·         Debentures.  At December 31, 2012, we had indebtedness of R$6,327 million outstanding under several series of debentures issued by CPFL Energia, CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga, RGE, CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Leste Paulista, CPFL Sul Paulista, CPFL Jaguari, CPFL Brasil, CPFL Geração, EPASA, BAESA, ENERCAN and CPFL Renováveis.  The terms of these debentures are summarized in note 16 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

·         Working capital.  At December 31, 2012, we had R$1,819 million outstanding under a number of loan agreements indexed to the CDI relating to working capital for our distribution, generation and services subsidiaries.

·         Other real-denominated  debt.  As of December 31, 2012, we had R$503 million outstanding under a number of other real-denominated facilities.  The most significant part of these loans relates to our distribution subsidiaries (R$46 million) and to our generation companies (R$450 million).  The majority of these loans are restated based on CDI or IGP-M, and bear interest at various rates.

·         U.S. dollar-denominated debt.  CPFL Paulista entered into bilateral loans denominated in U.S. dollars.  As of December 31, 2012, the total outstanding principal amounts for these loans were R$47 million.  In addition, we have U.S. dollar-denominated long‑term receivables, which amounted to R$34 million at December 31, 2012, which also mitigate our exposure to exchange rates.

·         Other U.S. dollar-denominated debt.  At December 31, 2012, we had R$2,388 million outstanding under other loans denominated in U.S. dollars.  We have entered into swap agreements in order to reduce our exposure to exchange rates that arises from these obligations.  For more details on our loans, debentures and derivatives, please see notes 15, 16 and 33 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

75

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Financial and Operating Covenants

We are subject to financial and operating covenants under our financial instruments and those of our subsidiaries.  These covenants include the following:

·         We have limitations on our ability to sell or pledge assets or to make investments in third parties.

·         BNDES financings: BNDES financings require our subsidiaries CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga, RGE, CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Mococa, CPFL Jaguari, CPFL Leste Paulista and CPFL Sul Paulista: (i) to only pay dividends and interest on shareholders’ equity, which sum exceeds the mandatory dividend provided by law, after compliance with all the contractual obligations; (ii) to fully  comply with the restrictive covenants established in the contract; and (iii) to keep certain financial ratios within pre-established parameters.  By the end of 2012, BNDES had approved changes in these financial ratios as follows:

·         CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga e RGE

·         Net indebtedness divided by EBITDA – maximum of 3.5;

·         Net indebtedness divided by the sum of net indebtedness and net equity – maximum of 0.90.

·         CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Leste Paulista and CPFL Sul Paulista (measured in the subsidiaries and in the Company)

·         Net indebtedness divided by EBITDA – maximum of 3.5;

In 2012, the subsidiary CPFL Leste Paulista signed an agreement with the BNDES for financing of R$ 12,272.  The agreement includes restrictive clauses that require the subsidiary to maintain a maximum “Net Indebtedness divided by adjusted EBITDA” ratio of 3.5. At December 31, 2012 the subsidiary had not complied with this obligation, which could result in dividends being withheld until the financial ratios are re-established. Failure to comply with this non-monetary obligation does not involve the possibility of early maturity of this debt, neither does it result in early maturity of other debts with specific cross-default conditions.

·         CPFL Mococa and CPFL Jaguari

There are no financial covenants.

 

·         CPFL Geração: the loans from the BNDES raised by the subsidiary CERAN and the jointly-controlled entities ENERCAN, BAESA and Foz do Chapecó establish restrictions on the payment of dividends to the subsidiary CPFL Geração higher than the minimum mandatory dividend of 25% without the prior agreement of the BNDES.  There is also a restrictive clause in relation to the BNDES loan to the jointly-controlled entity EPASA (under the FINEM system), in respect of maintaining a debt coverage ratio at 1.1 and a minimum own capital ratio (equity divided by fixed assets) of 25.3%, determined annually. If this is not complied with, the distribution of dividends in excess of the minimum mandatory dividend is prohibited until the index is complied with. The guarantor (Company) is also required to maintain the following financial ratios:

·           Net indebtedness divided by EBITDA – maximum of  3.5; and

76

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

·           Total Indebtendess divided by Total Assets – maximum of 65%.

 

·         CPFL Energias Renováveis:  The main restrictive clauses for the loans from the BNDES under the FINEM I, FINEM VII, FINAME I and FINEM X, BNB and NIB (Bons Ventos) and FINEM VI (Salto Goes) systems are :

·         Debt coverage ratio of 1.2 during the amortization period;

·         Own capitalization ratio of 25% or more during the amortization period.

At December 31, 2012 the indirect subsidiary Santa Luzia Energética S.A. (subsidiary of CPFL Renováveis) had not complied with the debt coverage ratio (ICSD), which requires cash generation of 1.2 times the debt service amount for the period. The total amount of the debt, R$ 112,747, was classified in current liabilities. Early maturity of the debt due to non-compliance with the debt coverage ratio agreed was not declared at December 31, 2012 and on February 20, 2013, the subsidiary obtained a waiver from Banco do Brasil to determine the  debt coverage ratio for the year ended December 31, 2012, and for the year ending December 31, 2013 and the half-year ending June 30, 2014. Failure to comply with the covenant also did not result in early maturity of other debts with specific cross-default conditions.

·         Banco do Brasil working capital financings: in 2012, amendments were made in 2012 to the agreements with Banco do Brasil – working capital of the subsidiaries CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga, RGE, CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Sul Paulista, CPFL Jaguari, CPFL Mococa and CPFL Leste Paulista, these financial covenants are now calculated half-yearly based on Company indicators. The new covenants are:

·         Net indebtedness divided by EBITDA  - maximum of 3.75; and

·         EBITDA divided by Financial Income (Expense) - minimum of 2.25.

·         Foreign currency loans: The foreign currency loans from the Bank of America, BNP Paribás, J.P Morgan, Société Générale, Citibank, Morgan Stanley, HSBC, Sumitomo and Scotiabank banks are subject to certain restrictive conditions, and include clauses that require the subsidiaries that obtained the loans to maintain certain financial ratios within pre-established parameters.  Amendments were made in 2012 to the foreign currency agreements in order to bring the Financial Covenants into line with the other agreements in local currency

·         Net indebtedness divided by EBITDA – maximum of 3.75; and

·         EBITDA divided by Financial Income (Expense) – minimum of 2.25.

·         Debentures:   by the end of 2012, all the debenture agreements signed by our distribution companies, CPFL Energia, CPFL Geração and CPFL Brasil that contemplate financial covenants had the same provisions with respect to the calculation of the ratios.  Certain contracts were amended in 2012 so as to calculate the respective financial covenants based on the indicators of the holding company:

·         Under CPFL Energia’s debentures, the maximum net debt to EBITDA ratio is 3.75 and the minimum EBITDA to financial income (expense) ratio is 2.25.

·         Under CPFL Paulista’s fifth and sixth issuances of debentures, CPFL Paulista’s maximum net debt to EBITDA ratio is 3.75 and its minimum EBITDA to financial income (expense) ratio is 2.25.

77

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

·         RGE’s third issuance of debentures did not provide for restrictive covenants.  Under RGE’s fifth and sixth issuances of debentures, RGE’s maximum net debt to EBITDA ratio is 3.75 and its minimum EBITDA to financial income (expense) ratio is 2.25.

·         In 2012, the indenture for CPFL Piratininga’s third issuance of debentures was amended such that its maximum net debt to EBITDA ratio is 3.75 and its minimum EBITDA to financial income (expense) ratio is 2.25.  Under CPFL Piratininga’s fifth and sixth issuances of debentures, its maximum net debt to EBITDA ratio is 3.75 and its minimum EBITDA to financial income (expense) ratio is 2.25.

·         In 2012, the indenture for CPFL Geração’s third issuance of debentures was amended such that its maximum net debt to EBITDA ratio is 3.75 and its minimum EBITDA to financial income (expense) ratio is 2.25.  Under CPFL Geração’s fourth issuance of debentures, its maximum net debt to EBITDA ratio is 3.75 and its minimum EBITDA to financial income (expense) ratio is 2.25.

·         Under CPFL Brasil’s second issuance of debentures, its maximum net debt to EBITDA ratio is 3.75 and its minimum EBITDA to financial income (expense) ratio is 2.25.

·         Under CPFL Santa Cruz’s first issuance of debentures, its maximum net debt to EBITDA ratio is 3.75 and its minimum EBITDA to financial income (expense) ratio is 2.25.

·         The debentures issued by the jointly-controlled subsidiary BAESA provide for acceleration when the ratio of total indebtedness to its total assets exceeds 75%.

·         The debentures issued by our indirect subsidiary Jantus are subject to restrictive covenants with respect to constituting encumbrances and additional indebtedness, distributing dividends and changing its corporate structure.

·         The debentures issued by our indirect subsidiary PCH Holding 2 S.A. (a subsidiary of CPFL Energias Renováveis) are subject to restrictive covenants with respect to changing the corporate structure of PCH Holding 2 S.A. or of CPFL Renováveis.  In addition, there are restrictive covenants with respect to maintenance of the following financial ratios: a maximum consolidated leverage ratio of 80% and a minimum aggregate debt service cash coverage ratio of 1.15.

For purposes of determining covenants, the definition of EBITDA for the subsidiaries takes into consideration inclusion of the main regulatory assets and liabilities. In the Company’s case, it also takes into account consolidation based on the interest in the respective subsidiaries (for both EBITDA and assets and liabilities).

 

Other loan and financing agreements of the direct and indirect subsidiaries are subject to early settlement in the event of changes in the Company’s structure or in the corporate structure of the subsidiaries that result in the loss of the share control or of control over management of the Company by the Company’s current shareholders, unless at least one of the shareholders (Camargo Corrêa and Previ) remains directly or indirectly in the block of control by the Company.

Certain debentures of subsidiaries and jointly-owned subsidiaries are subject to early settlement in the event of changes in the Company’s structure or in the corporate structure of the subsidiaries that result in the loss of the share control or of control over management of the Company by the Company’s current shareholders

Furthermore, failure to comply with the obligations or restrictions mentioned could result in default in relation to other contractual obligations (cross default), depending on each loan and financing agreement.

The Management of the Company and its subsidiaries monitor these ratios systematically and constantly to ensure that the contractual conditions are complied with. In the opinion of the management, these restrictive covenants and clauses are being adequately complied with, except as mentioned previously in relation to the indirectly-controlled entity CPFL Renováveis and the subsidiary CPFL Leste Paulista, all the restrictive conditions and clauses are being adequately complied with at December 31, 2012

78

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

For more information on our financial covenants, see explanatory notes 15 and 16 to our financial statements.

Uses of funds

Our cash flow used for investing activities was R$ 3,368 million in 2012 compared with $ 2,488 million in 2011. This increase of R$ 881 million primarily reflects: (i) an increase of R$ 269 million related to the acquisitions of Santa Luzia and Jantus occurred in 2011, and the acquisitions of companies Atlantic Wind Complex, Good Winds and plant Ester (SPE Lacenas) in 2012, net of cash acquired, (ii) increase of R$ 563  million in purchases of property and equipment, primarily by investment in power generation from renewable sources, and in intangible primarily by investment in distribution infrastructure.

Net cash used for investment was R$2,488 million in 2011, as compared to R$1,802 million in 2010.  This R$686 million increase mainly reflects a capital increase of R$863 million for the acquisition of Jantus, which was partially offset by cash provided from ERSA subsidiaries.

Funding Requirements and Contractual Commitments

Our capital requirements are primarily for the following purposes:

·         We make capital expenditures to continue improving and expanding our distribution system and to complete our renewable generation projects.  See “—Capital Expenditures” above for a discussion of our historical and planned capital expenditures;

·         Repayment or refinancing maturing debt.  At December 31, 2012 we had outstanding debt maturing during the following 12 months aggregating R$1,895 million (excluding derivatives and interest);

·         Dividends on a semiannual basis.  We paid R$1,394 million in 2012 and R$1,230 million in 2011.  See “Item 10.  Additional Information—Interest Attributable to Shareholders’ Equity;” and

·         Funding for acquisitions.  In 2012, we paid R$879 million for the acquisition of Jantus and Santa Luzia, Atlântica and Bons Ventos wind farm complex.

Capital Expenditures

Our principal capital expenditures in the past several years have been for the maintenance and upgrading of our Distribution Networks and for our generation projects. The following table sets forth our capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010:

 

Year ended December 31,

 

2012

2011

2010

(in millions of reais

 

 

 

 

Distribution

1,403

1,065

1,128

Generation

1,043

823

645

Commercialization and other investments

22

17

29

 

 

 

 

Total

2,468

R$1,905

R$1,802

 

We plan to make capital expenditures aggregating approximately R$2,325 million in 2013 and approximately R$1,923 million in 2014.  Of total budgeted capital expenditures over this period, R$2,164 million are expected to be invested in our distribution segment, R$1,784 million in our renewable generation segment and R$17 million in our conventional generation segment.  Part of these expenditures, particularly in generation projects, is already contractually committed.  See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Funding Requirements and Contractual Commitments.”  Planned capital expenditures for development of our generation capacity, and the related financing arrangements, are discussed in more detail under “Item 4. Information on the Company—Generation of Electricity.”

79

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

                Dividends

On August 6, 2012, our  Board of Directors based on the results of the first semester, approved the declaration of interim dividend in the amount of R$ 640 million, equivalent to R$ 0.665339515 per share. On March 13, 2013 our  Board of Directors approved the additional proposed dividend in the amount of R$ 456 million based on the accumulated profit for the year 2012, equivalent to R$ 0.473778718 per share, totaling R$ 1,096 million. During 2012 we  made a payment of R$ 1,394 million (R$ 1,407 million in the consolidated). We expect to pay in April 2013 the remaining R$ 456 million based on the accumulated profit of the second semester of 2012.

 

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and committments as of December 31, 2012 (include other noncurrent contractual obligations).   

 

Payments due by period

 

Total

Less than 1 year

1-3 years

4-5 years

After 5 years

 

(in millions of reais

Contractual obligations as of December 31, 2012:

 

 

 

 

 

Suppliers

1,695

1,691

4

-

-

Debt obligations(1)

24,696

2,199

5,129

6,461

10,907

Public utilities (1)

3,460

33

37

37

3,354

Pension funding(2)

747

51

105

105

486

Other

288

270

-

-

18

Total of Balance Sheet items (1)

30,886

4,244

5,275

6,603

14,764

Electricity purchase agreements(3)

110,991

7,126

13,795

14,978

75,092

Generation projects (4)

2,062

886

584

70

522

Supplies

2,114

1,300

675

99

40

Total of other commitments

115,167

9,312

15,054

15,147

75,654

Total of contractual obligations

146,053

13,556

20,329

21,750

90,419

 


(1)           Includes interest payments, including future interest projected cash flow based on undiscounted, through index projections for 2013: (CDI: 7.08%, IGP-M: 5.43% and TJLP: 5%). These future interests are not recorded on our Balance Sheet.

(2)           Estimated future contributions to the pension plan.

(3)           Amounts payable under long‑term energy purchase agreements, which are subject to changing prices and provide for renegotiation under certain circumstances.  The table represents the amounts payable for the contracted volumes applying the year-end 2012 price.  See “—Background—Prices for Purchased Electricity” and note 34 to our consolidated financial statements.

(4)           The power plant construction projects include commitments made basically to make funds available for construction and acquisition of concession related to the subsidiaries in the renewable energy segment.

 

Research and Development and Electricity Efficiency Programs

In accordance with applicable Brazilian law, since June 2000 companies holding concessions, permissions and authorizations for distribution, generation and Transmission of electricity have been required to dedicate a minimum of 1.0% of their net operating revenue each year to research and development and electricity efficiency programs.  Small Hydroelectric Power Plants and wind, sun and biomass energy projects are not subject to this requirement.  Beginning in April 2007, our distribution concessionaires dedicated 0.5% of their net operating revenue to research and development and 0.5% to electricity efficiency programs, while our generation concessionaries dedicated 1.0% of their net operating revenue to research and development.

80

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Our electricity efficiency program is designed to foster the efficient use of electricity by our consumers, to reduce technical and commercial losses and offer products and services that improve satisfaction and loyalty and enhance our corporate image.  Our research and development programs utilize technological research to develop products, which may be used internally, as well as sold to the public.  We carry out certain of these programs through strategic partnerships with national universities and research centers, and the vast majority of our resources are dedicated to innovation and development in new technologies applicable to our business.

Our disbursements on research and development projects in 2010, 2011 and 2012 totaled R$179 million, R$213 million and R$165 million, respectively.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2012, we have not off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material impact on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources

About our indebtedness, we have the following percentage used of our current funding arrangements

           

In 2012 (in thousand of reais

Modality

 

Aprroval

 

Company

 

Debt

 

Released

 

Balance

BNDES / Investment - FINAME I

 

In 2010

 

CPFL Renováveis

 

398,547

 

377,094

 

21,453

BNDES / Investment - FINEM VI

 

In 2012

 

CPFL Paulista

 

790,000

 

340,000

 

450,000

BNDES / Investment - FINEM V

 

In 2012

 

CPFL Piratininga

 

220,000

 

84,500

 

135,500

BNDES / Investment - FINEM VI

 

In 2012

 

RGE

 

274,997

 

136,512

 

138,485

BNDES / Investment - FINEM I

 

In 2012

 

CPFL Santa Cruz

 

23,556

 

22,638

 

918

BNDES / Investment - FINEM I

 

In 2012

 

CPFL Leste Paulista

 

12,273

 

10,535

 

1,738

BNDES / Investment - FINEM I

 

In 2012

 

CPFL Sul Paulista

 

14,991

 

12,277

 

2,714

BNDES / Investment - FINEM VI

 

In 2012

 

CPFL Renováveis

 

85,244

 

69,982

 

15,262

BNDES / Investment - FINEM VIII

 

In 2012

 

CPFL Renováveis

 

104,500

 

49,000

 

55,500

BNDES / Investment - FINAME III

 

In 2012

 

CPFL Renováveis

 

104,500

 

49,000

 

55,500

 
Trend Information

We intend to invest in innovation and technology to increase the quality of our operations and our operational efficiency, which are our perennial goals.  The new technologies we plan to use in our Tauron projects may increase our operational efficiency in the future.

Additionally, we seek to promote growth in each of our business segments:  distribution, conventional generation sources, renewable generation sources and commercialization and services.

We intend to continue to expand our distribution segment, either through market growth or through the acquisition of energy distribution companies (if there are companies in the market with characteristics and at a price that will be beneficial to us).

Market growth is heavily influenced by economic growth, in particular, an increase in employment, income, retail sector sales and industrial production.  In addition, the market is also influenced by the entry of new clients and changes in weather and rainfall volume.

The market shows positive signs of growth for 2013.  According to projections from the FOCUS report, published on January 4, 2013 by the Central Bank, GDP is expected to grow 3.3% in 2013 and 3.8% in 2014, which will impact energy consumption.  This growth should be sustained not only by individual and commercial economic growth (the increase in salaries, consumer purchasing power and credit availability), but also by the recovery of the Brazilian power industry, which had a modest growth in 2012 as a result of the unfavorable international economic scenario.

81

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Our generation segment has shown high levels of growth in the last few years, with the acquisition and construction of new plants.  In 2011, the creation of CPFL Energias Renováveis marked an important moment for us.  We plan to continue to expand our generation activities, both in the conventional energy and the renewable energy (wind farms, Small Hydroelectric Power Plants and biomass thermoelectric plants) sectors.  We are currently pursuing this strategy through CPFL Energias Renováveis, with an Installed Capacity of 1,154 MW (of which our share is 727 MW) and 582 MW under construction (of which our share is 367 MW), as well as seeking out new projects.

As of December 31, 2012, we had an Installed Capacity of 2,961MW, which should reach 3,167 MW 9 by the end of 2013 after the Coopcana and Alvorada Thermoelectric Power Plants and the Macacos I, Campo dos Ventos II and Atlântica wind farms begin operations.  In 2016, we expect to reach an Installed Capacity of 3,327 MW, when the Campo dos Ventos and São Benedito wind farm complexes begin operations.  We also have a 3,800 MW (of which our share is 2,394 MW) portfolio to develop over the coming years through CPFL Energias Renováveis.  In addition, we will continue to seek out new projects in the conventional energy sector. 

In the commercialization and services segment, our main objective is to maintain our leading position, in terms of market share in order to guarantee our above-average profitability.  In addition, we expect to expand our portfolio of services, retain the loyalty of our customers and expand our services to new markets.

Since our founding, we have employed a growth strategy based on operational excellence through innovation and technology, synergy, financial discipline and the accumulation of value.  We plan to continue this in the future in order to consolidate our strong position in the energy industry.

Use of Estimates in Certain Accounting Policies   

In preparing our financial statements, we make estimates concerning a variety of matters.  Some of these matters are highly uncertain, and our estimates involve judgments we make based on the information available to us.  In the discussion below, we have identified several other matters that would materially affect our financial presentation if either (i) we used different estimates that we could reasonably have used or (ii) in the future we change our estimates in response to changes that are reasonably likely to occur.

The discussion addresses only those estimates that we consider most important based on the degree of uncertainty and the likelihood of a material impact if we used a different estimate.  There are many other areas in which we use estimates about uncertain matters, but the reasonably likely effect of changed or different estimates is not material to our financial presentation.  Please see the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements included herein for a more detailed discussion of the application of these and other accounting policies.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

Long-lived assets, which include property, plant and equipment, purchased intangible assets and investments, comprise a significant amount of our total assets and are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  We carry balances on our balance sheet that are based on historical costs net of accumulated depreciation and amortization.  We are required under IFRS to periodically evaluate whether these assets are impaired, that is, whether their future capacity to generate cash does not justify maintaining them at their carrying values.  The methods used to assess impairment include tests based on the asset’s value in use.  In such cases, the assets (e.g. goodwill and intangible assets of concession) are segregated and grouped together at the lowest level that generates identifiable cash flows (the “cash generating unit”, or CGU).  If they are impaired, we are required to recognize a loss by writing off part of their value to expense in the current period.  The analysis we perform requires that we estimate the future cash flows attributable to these assets, and these estimates require us to make a variety of judgments about our future operations, including judgments concerning market growth and other macroeconomic factors as well as the demand for electricity.  Changes in these judgments could require us to recognize impairment losses in future periods.  Our evaluations in 2012, 2011 and 2010 did not result in any significant impairment of our property, plant and equipment or intangible assets and investments.


9 This number includes four wind farms from the Bons Ventos complex which acquisition is still subject to the approval of ANEEL and other contractual conditions.

82

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Impairment of Financial Assets 

A financial asset not measured at fair value through profit or loss is reassessed at each reporting date to determine whether there is objective evidence that it is impaired.  Impairment can occur after the initial recognition of the asset and have a negative effect on the estimated future cash flows.

The Company and its subsidiaries consider evidence of impairment of receivables and held-to-maturity investment securities for both specific asset and at a collective level for all significant securities. Receivables and held-to-maturity investment securities that are not individually significant are collectively assessed for impairment by grouping together the securities with similar risk characteristics.

In assessing collective impairment the Company uses historical trends of the probability of default, timing of recoveries and the amount of loss incurred, adjusted for management's judgment as to whether the assumptions and current economic and credit conditions are such that the actual losses are likely to be higher or lower than suggested by historic trends.

An impairment loss of a financial asset is recognized as follows:

·       Amortized cost: as the difference between the carrying amount and the present value of the estimated future cash flows discounted at the asset’s original effective interest rate. Losses are recognized in profit or loss and shown in an allowance account against receivables. Interest on the impaired asset continues to be recognized through the unwinding of the discount. When a subsequent event indicates that the amount of impairment loss has decreased, this reduction is reversed to credit through profit or loss.

·       Available-for-sale: as the difference between the acquisition cost, net of any principal repayment and amortization of the principal, and the current fair value, less any impairment loss previously recognized in profit or loss. Losses are recognized in profit or loss.

In the case of financial assets registered at amortized cost and/or debt instruments classified as available-for-sale, if an increase (gain) is identified in periods subsequent to recognition of the loss, the impairment loss is reversed through profit or loss. However, any subsequent recovery in the fair value of an impaired available-for-sale security is recognized in other comprehensive income
Pension Liabilities

We sponsor pension plans and disability and death benefit plans covering substantially all of our employees.  The determination of the amount of our obligations for pension benefits depends on certain actuarial assumptions, including discount rate, inflation etc.  For further information about the actuarial assumptions see note 17 to our consolidated financial statements. Moreover, the IAS 19 was revised, with application from 2013, which effects are described in note 3.8 to our consolidated financial statements.

Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities

We account for income taxes in accordance with IFRS, which requires an asset and liability approach to recording current and deferred taxes.  Accordingly, the effects of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the amounts recognized in our financial statements have been treated as temporary differences for the purpose of recording deferred income tax.

We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability.  If  evidences are not enough to prove that is more likely than not that we will generate sufficient future taxable income, or if there is a material change in the actual effective tax rates or time period within which the underlying temporary differences become taxable or deductible, we could be required to establish a valuation allowance against all or a significant portion of our deferred tax assets resulting in a substantial increase in our effective tax rate and a material adverse impact on our operating results.

 

83

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Reserve for Tax, Civil and Labor Risks

We and our subsidiaries are party to certain legal proceedings in Brazil arising in the normal course of business regarding tax, labor, civil and other issues.

Accruals for reserve for tax, civil and labor risks are estimated based on historical experience, the nature of the claims, and the current status of the claims.  The evaluation of these risks is performed by various specialists, inside and outside of the company.  Accounting for provision for tax, civil and labor risks requires significant judgment by management concerning the estimated probabilities and ranges of exposure to potential liability.  Management’s assessment of our exposure to provision for tax, civil and labor risks could change as new developments occur or more information becomes available.  The outcome of the risks could vary significantly and could materially impact our consolidated results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

Financial instruments

Financial instruments can be measured at fair values or at recognized costs, depending on certain factors.  Those measured at fair value were recognized based on quoted prices in an active market, or assessed using pricing models, applied individually for each transaction, taking into consideration the future payment flows, based on the conditions contracted, discounted to present value at market interest rate curves, based on information obtained from the BM&FBOVESPA and the National Association of Financial and Capital Market Institutions, Associação Brasileira das Entidades dos Mercados Financeiros e de Capitais – ANBIMA websites, when available.  Accordingly, the market value of a security corresponds to its maturity value (redemption value) marked to present value by the discount factor (relating to the maturity date of the security) obtained from the market interest graph in Brazilian reais

Financial assets classified as available-for-sale refer to the right to compensation to be paid by the Federal Government on reversion of the assets of the distribution concessionaires (financial asset of concession).  The methodology adopted for marking these assets to market is based on the tariff review process for distributors.  This review, conducted every four or five years according to the concessionaire, consists of revaluation at market price of the distribution infrastructure.  This valuation basis is used for pricing the tariff, which is increased annually up to the next tariff review, based on the parameter of the main inflation indexes.

Law No. 12,783/13 defined the methodology and criteria for valuation of the compensation on reversion of the assets based on the Regulation Base for Remuneration (Base Regulatória de Remuneração – BRR).  Accordingly, the valuation of the compensation on reversion is prescribed through a valuation process carried out by ANEEL.

 

Depreciation and Amortization of Intangible Assets

We account for depreciation using the straight-line method, at annual rates based on the estimated useful life of assets, as established by ANEEL, in accordance with practices adopted in Brazil.  Amortization of intangible assets varies according to the way they are acquired:

·         Intangible assets acquired in a business combination:  The portion arising from business combinations that corresponds to the right to operate the concession is stated as an intangible asset. Such amounts are amortized over the remaining term of the concessions, on a straight-line basis or based on the net income curves projected for the concessionaires, as applicable.

·         Investments in infrastructure (application of IFRIC 12 – Service Concession Arrangements):  Since the concession term is contractually defined, intangible assets acquired as investment in infrastructure have a pre‑determined useful life.  We account for the amortization of these assets using a curve that reflects the consumption standard as compared to the expected profits.

·         Public utilities:  We account for the amortization of intangible assets relating to our use of a public asset using the straight-line method for the remaining term of the concession.

 

84

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 6.                        Directors, Senior Management and Employees

Directors and Senior Management
Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors is responsible for determining our overall strategic guidelines and, among other things, for establishing our general business policies and for electing our executive officers and supervising their management.  According to our bylaws, our Board of Directors consists of a minimum of seven members and a maximum of nine members.  Currently, our Board of Directors consists of seven members, of which one is independent (in accordance with the listing regulations of the New Market of the BM&FBOVESPA, or the Novo Mercado, and our bylaws).  In the event of a tie, the chairman will have the deciding vote.  The Board of Directors meets at least once a month, or whenever requested by the chairman in accordance with our bylaws.

Under our bylaws, the board members are elected by the holders of our common shares at the annual general meeting of shareholders.  Board members serve one-year terms, re-election being permitted provided that they may be removed at any time by our shareholders at an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders.  Our current directors were elected at our shareholders’ meeting held on April 12th, 2012.  Their terms will expire at our next annual shareholders’ meeting, scheduled to take place in April, 2013.  Our bylaws do not provide for a mandatory retirement age for our directors.

Under Brazilian Corporate Law, if a director or an executive officer has a conflict of interest with the company in connection with any proposed transaction, the director or executive officer may not vote in any decision of the Board of Directors, or of the board of executive officers, regarding such transaction, and must disclose the nature and extent of the conflicting interest for transcription in the minutes of the meeting.  A director or an executive officer may not transact any business with the company, including accepting any loans, except on reasonable or fair terms and conditions that are identical to the terms and conditions prevailing in the market or offered by third parties.  As of December 31, 2012, any transaction entered into between our shareholders or related parties and us that exceeds R$8.5 million, as adjusted annually by the IGP-M index, must be previously approved by our Board of Directors.  As of this date, there are no relevant agreements or other obligations between us and our directors.

Under Brazilian Corporate Law, combined with a decision by CVM, noncontrolling shareholders have the right to designate at least one member of our board of directors for election to the board, provided that they hold at least 10.0% of the outstanding voting shares.  Noncontrolling shareholders that own greater than 5.0% of voting shares may request voto múltiplo (multiple voting).

The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each current member of our Board of Directors.  A brief biographical description of each of our directors follows the table. 

Name

Age

Position

Murilo Cesar Lemos dos Santos Passos

65

Chairman

Claudio Borin Guedes Palaia

37

Director

Francisco Caprino Neto

52

Director

Renê Sanda

48

Director

Ivan de Souza Monteiro

52

Vice-Chairman

Helena Kerr do Amaral

57

Director

Maria Helena dos Santos Fernandes de Santana

53

Independent Director

 

Murilo Cesar Lemos dos Santos Passos - Mr. Passos graduated in Chemical Engineering from the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) in 1971.  Between 1970 and 1977, he held positions at the Ministry of Industry and Commerce – Industrial Development Council (CDI).  Between 1977 and 1992, he worked at Companhia Vale do Rio Doce and subsequently became the CEO and Head of Forestry Products, Environment and Metallurgy Area of Celulose Nipo-Brasileira S.A (CENIBRA) and Florestas Rio Doce S.A..  Between 1993 and 2006, he was an executive officer of Bahia Sul Celulose S.A. and Suzano Papel e Celulose S.A.  He was a member of the Board of Directors of Brasil Agro Cia. Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas between 2007 and 2010.  Currently, he is a member of the Management Committee of the Board of Directors of Suzano Papel e Celulose S.A., Vice President of the Trustee Council of the Foundation for the National Quality Award (FNPQ), a member of the Superior Council of Ecofuturo Institute and a member of the Advisory Council of the Pulp and Paper Producers’ Association - BRACELPA.  He is also a member of the Board of Directors of São Martinho S.A., Odontoprev S.A. and Tegma Gestão Logística S.A.  Since 2010, he has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors of CPFL Energia.

85

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Claudio Borin Guedes Palaia - Mr. Palaia graduated in Business Administration from Fundação Getúlio Vargas Business School of São Paulo in 1997.  He obtained an MBA degree from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania in 2002.  He worked as an analyst of mergers and acquisitions at JP Morgan Bank in São Paulo and in New York from 1997 to 1998.  From 2002 to 2005, he was project leader in Camargo Corrêa Energia S.A., Camargo Corrêa S.A. (CCSA) and São Paulo Alpargatas.  From 2005 to 2007, he was an executive officer of Hormigón da Loma Negra C.I.A.S.A in Buenos Aires, Argentina.  Since 2008, he has been an executive officer of Camargo Corrêa Cimentos.  He is also a sitting member of the Board of Directors of São Paulo Alpargatas.  In 2009, he was an alternate member of the Board of Directors of CPFL Energia.  Since 2010, he has been a sitting member of the Board of Directors of CPFL Energia.

Francisco Caprino Neto - Mr. Caprino Neto graduated in Metallurgical Engineering from the Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo (USP) in 1983 and completed a master’s degree program in the same area at the same institution in 1992.  He was the chairman of the Processes Engineering Department and advisor for the Control and Planning Department of Siderúrgica J.L. Aliperti S.A., as well as the coordinator of metallurgical process of Aços Villares S.A.  He was a sitting member of the Board of Directors of CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga, CPFL Geração and RGE from 2005 to 2006.  Currently, he holds the position of executive officer and member of the Board of Directors of Camargo Corrêa Energia S.A. and Camargo Corrêa Investimentos em Infraestrutura (CCII).  He is also member of the Board of Directors of VBC Energia S.A., Companhia de Concessões Rodoviárias (CCR) and A-Port S.A.  Since April 2000, he has been a member of the Board of Directors of CPFL Energia.

Renê Sanda – Mr. Sanda graduated in Statistics from University of São Paulo (USP) in 1989 and completed a master’s degree program in Statistics at the same institution in 1989.  In 1992, he completed an MBA program in Finance from the Brazilian Institute of Capital Markets (IBMEC) and participated in the Commercial and Investment Banking Program Professional Development Center at Citibank, in Fort Lauderdale.  He was an assistant manager at BB New York between 2002 and 2006 and at Banco do Brasil Securities between 2005 and 2006.  From 2006 to 2010, he was the Risk Management Officer of Banco do Brasil.  He was a member of the Fiscal Council of Tele Amazônia Celular Participações, Telemig Celular Participações, CPFL Paulista and CPFL Geração.  He was a member of the Board of Directors of Petroflex S.A. Indústria e Comércio, Banco do Brasil Securities LLC – New York (USA), BB Securities Ltd. – London (UK) and Fundição Tupy.  He is an associate at Instituto Brasileiro de Governança Corporativa – IBGC.  Since 2010, he has been the Investment Officer of Caixa de Previdência dos Funcionários do Banco do Brasil – PREVI.  Mr. Sanda became a member of our Board of Directors in 2011.

Ivan de Souza Monteiro – Mr. Monteiro graduated in Electronic Engineering and Telecommunications from INATEL - MG in 1986.  He completed an MBA program in Finance from the Brazilian Institute of Capital Markets (IBMEC) in 1995 and an MBA program in Business Administration from Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC‑RJ) in 2000.  Since 1983, he works at Banco do Brasil, where he was a local superintendent between 1996 and 1998, a state superintendent between 1998 and 1999, a commercial manager between 1999 and 2004, a commercial superintendent between 2004 and 2007 and the officer in charge of branches outside of Brazil between 2007 and 2009.  In May 2009, he was the Commercial Officer of Banco do Brasil and, since June 2009, he has been the Vice-President of Finance, Capital Markets and Investor Relations of Banco do Brasil.  Since 2009, he has been a member of the Decision Making Council of Caixa de Previdência dos Funcionários do Banco do Brasil – PREVI.  He is also a member of the Board of Directors of Banco Votorantim and BV Participações.  He has been an alternate member of the Board of Directors of Brasil Veículos since January 2011.  Mr. Monteiro became a member of our Board of Directors in 2011.

Helena Kerr do Amaral – Ms. Amaral graduated in Business Management from Fundação Getúlio Vargas Business School of São Paulo (FGV-SP) in 1978 and completed a master’s degree in Public Management and Urban Planning at the same institution in 1990.   Ms. Amaral has been a Public Sector Economy fellow at George Washington University (Minerva Program), has been certified in Human Resources Management by the Japanese Government Human Resources Agency, and is currently pursuing a PhD in  Economics at the State University of Campinas (UNICAMP) Institute of Economics. She is the Strategic Planning Executive Officer  at Fundação Petrobras de Seguridade Social (Petros) since September, 2011. Her professional experience in public management spans more than 30 years and top governmental positions in the municipal, state and federal levels.  She has chaired the National School of Public Administration (ENAP) from 2003 to 2011, the Public Management Secretary of the Municipality of São Paulo, from 2001 to 2002, and the Public Finance Department's Treasury School of the State of São Paulo, from 1999 to 2000. She has also been a Senior Technician of Planning and Management at the Administrative Development Foundation – (FUNDAP) of the State of São Paulo since 1986,  and she has served as a member of the Board of Directors of AES Eletropaulo from 2003 to 2011, BNDES’s Special Agency of Industrial Financing (FINAME) from 2007 to 2011, FINEP from 2003 to 2007 and CTEEP from 2004 to 2005. She became a member of our Board of Directors in 2012.

86

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Maria Helena dos Santos Fernandes de Santana – Ms. Santana is graduated in Economics from the School of Economics, Business and Accounting at the University of São Paulo - FEA/USP (1990). She was the former President of the Securities and Exchange Commission – CVM (2007 to 2012), where she worked as an Executive Officer since 2006. Ms. Santana was the President of the Executive Committee of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) from 2011 to 2012, a member of the Board of Directors of the Brazilian Corporate Governance Institute - IBGC from 2001 to 2005, and has been a member of the Latin American Roundtable on Corporate Governance (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development - OECD / World Bank Group) since 2000. Ms. Santana become a independent director of our Board of Directors in 2013

Executive Officers

Our executive officers are responsible for our day-to-day management.  Under our bylaws, our board of executive officers is comprised of six members that are appointed by our Board of Directors for a two-year term, with the possibility of re-election.  Our current executive officers were elected at the Board of Directors’ meeting held on May 25, 2011.  However, there are three officers who were elected after that meeting.  Our Operations Vice President Officer was elected on August 31, 2011, our Business Development Vice President Officer was elected on March 1, 2012 and our Corporate Affairs Vice President and Legal Officer was elected on May, 17, 2012.

The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each current executive officer.  A brief biographical description of each of our executive officers follows the table.  

Name

Age

Position

Wilson Ferreira Júnior

53

Chief Executive Officer (CEO)

Gustavo Estrella

38

Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer

Carlos Márcio Ferreira

53

Operations Vice President Officer

José Marcos Chaves de Melo

49

Administrative Vice President Officer

Carlos da Costa Parcias Junior

52

Business Development Vice President Officer

Ricardo Cleber Zangirolami

42

Corporate Affairs Vice President Officer

 

Wilson Ferreira Junior - Mr. Ferreira Junior graduated from Mackenzie University in Electrical Engineering  in 1981, and in Business Administration in 1983.  He attended a master’s degree program in Energy at the University of São Paulo (USP), for which he did not complete the thesis requirements, and several specialization programs, including:  Occupational Safety and Health Engineering (Mackenzie University, 1982), Marketing (Getúlio Vargas Foundation – FGV, 1988), and Electricity Distribution Management (Swedish Power Co., 1992).  At Companhia Energética de São Paulo (CESP), he held several senior positions and served as the Distribution Officer from 1995 to 1998.  He served as the CEO of RGE from 1998 to 2000, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Bandeirante Energia S.A. from 2000 to 2001, and President of the Brazilian Association of Electric Power Distributors (ABRADEE) from 2009 to 2010.  Mr. Ferreira Junior is currently the Vice President of the Brazilian Association of Infrastructure and Basic Industry (ABDIB) and a member of the Board of Directors of the National Electrical System Operator (ONS).  From 2002 to 2011, he was a member of the Board of Directors of CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga, CPFL Geração and RGE.  From 2000 to 2011, he was the CEO of CPFL Paulista, and from 2001 to 2011, he was the CEO of CPFL Piratininga, CPFL Geração and CPFL Brasil.  He has also been the CEO of RGE, CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Jaguariúna, CPFL Bioenergia, and other subsidiaries of CPFL Energia. Since 2002, he has been the CEO of CPFL Energia.  Mr. Ferreira Junior is currently the chairman of the Board of Directors of CPFL Energias Renováveis. 

87

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Gustavo Estrella – Mr. Estrella graduated from Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro – UERJ in Business Administration. He completed an MBA program in Finance from the IBMEC-RJ. He worked at Grupo Lafarge and at the companies Light and Brasil Telecom. Since 2001, he works at CPFL Energia, where he was Manager of Economic Planning and Finance, Director of Investor Relations and Director of Planning and Control. Since February 2013, he has been the Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer of CPFL Energia and the Financial Director of CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga, CPFL Geração, RGE and other subsidiaries of CPFL Energia group. Mr. Estrella is currently member of the Board of Directors of RGE, CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga and CPFL Geração.  

Carlos Márcio Ferreira – In 1987, Mr. Ferreira graduated from the Business and Economics University of São João da Boa Vista, São Paulo with a degree in Business Administration and Accounting.  In 1993, he received a graduate degree from Fundação Getúlio Vargas in São Paulo (FGV/SP) in Controlling and Finance.  Since 1991, he has participated every year in Executive Training Seminars, including the following programs:  the Senior Finance Executive Development Program at Champion International Corporation Corporate University, administered by professors from Harvard Business School and Dartmouth Tuck Business School, and Leader Development (CEOs) at UC Berkeley Executive Education.  From 1973 to 2004, he worked in the administrative and finance departments of International Paper do Brasil Ltda., a company in the paper and packaging industry.  During his time at International Paper do Brasil Ltda., Mr. Ferreira held the following positions:  Manager of the Controlling Department (1991 to 1993); Strategic Planning Manager (1995 to 1996); Business Manager (1996 to 1998); Business Development Officer (1999 to 2000); and Vice-President of Controlling and Finance (2000 to 2004), during which he was responsible for information technology, legal, accounting, strategic planning and mergers and acquisitions.  At International Paper do Brasil Ltda, he has worked for three years in factories in the USA and in the main office in Stamford, Connecticut.  In November 2004, he began working for Elektro (in Campinas, SP) as Chief Operating Officer responsible for strategy coordination and implementation in the operations, distribution, commercial, finance, regulatory, legal, human resources and infrastructure areas.  In April 2007, he became the CEO of Elektro, a position which he held until 2011.  Mr. Ferreira is currently the Operations Vice President Officer at CPFL Energia S.A., the Chairman of the Board of Directors of RGE, CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga and CPFL Geração.

José Marcos Chaves de Melo - In 1980, Mr. Melo graduated as an electronics technician from the Federal Center for Technological Education of Rio de Janeiro (CEFET-RJ).  In 1986, he graduated in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Kansas.  Among his achievements, the following stand out:  Fulbright scholarship, American National Engineering Honor Society (Tau Beta Pi), the 2005 SAP Diamond Circle Award for Outstanding Business Contributions, and the 2006 Accenture World Innovation Award.  Mr. Chaves worked at Accenture from 1987 to 2008, serving as senior executive from 1998 to 2008.  He was responsible for the execution of several projects with companies of the electricity sector for 12 years, oil and gas sectors for five years, steel sector for two years, and in the manufacturing sector for one year.  He has experience in several functional areas, such as information technology, supply chain, field work and asset management.  During his career he has served companies such as Neoenergia, Light, CEMIG, Duke Energy, Petrobrás, Repsol-YPF and CSN, the Electric Power Trade Board (CCEE) and ONS.  Mr. Chaves is currently the Administrative Officer of CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga, RGE, CPFL Geração and other subsidiaries of CPFL Energia.  He has been the Administrative Vice President Officer of CPFL Energia since 2008.

Carlos da Costa Parcias Junior Mr. Parcias has a Master’s degree in Economics from the Rio de Janeiro Catholic University (PUC-Rio, 1988) and Bachelor’s degree in Economics from the Rio de Janeiro Federal University (UFRJ, 1984).  During 2011 he was Director of Equity Investments in Energy at Camargo Correa Holding Company.  From 2004 to 2010, Mr. Parcias had his own Independent Financial Advisory Firm, focusing on mergers and acquisitions and private equity transactions.  Previously, Mr. Parcias held senior leadership positions in the financial industry:  CEO at Icatu Gestão de Participações focusing on alternative investment management (2001 to 2003); Head of Investment Banking at Fleming Graphus (1998 to 2000); CEO at BBA-Capital Asset Management (1996 to 1998); Head of Capital Markets at BBA-Creditanstalt Bank (1993 to 1995);  Executive Office at JP Morgan Brazil (1992 to 1993); Advisor to Presidency at BNDES (1990 to 1992).  Since March 2012, Mr. Parcias is Business Development Vice President Officer at CPFL Energia.

88

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Ricardo Cleber Zangirolami - Mr. Zangirolami graduated in Law by the University of São Paulo (USP) in 1993, and holds an International Executive MBA from FIA-USP in 2007.  He has also specializations in Corporate Law, Contracts and other various management and leadership courses in Brazil and abroad.  Before joining CPFL, from 2006 to 2012 he worked for International Paper Brasil Ltd., acting as Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Affairs Director in Latin America.  His role included the leadership of Legal, Communications, Government and Institutional Affairs, Sustainability, Corporate Social Responsibility and Ethics & Compliance areas.  During such period he was also the Executive President of International Paper Foundation in Latin America, member of the Executive Committee of IP in Latin America, member of the Executive Committee of IP in Brasil Pension Fund, and member of the Board of Directors of IP Exports Ltd.  During his career, Mr. Zangirolami also occupied leading positions in companies such as Elektro Energy, ABB-Alstom and Odebrecht group.  Since end May 2012, Mr. Zangirolami is the Corporate Affairs Vice President and Legal Officer of CPFL Energia.

Fiscal Council

Under Brazilian Corporate Law, the Conselho Fiscal, or fiscal council, is a corporate body independent of the management and the company’s external auditors.  Our fiscal council is permanent, although Brazilian Corporate Law allows fiscal councils to be either permanent or non‑permanent and may be composed of a minimum of three and a maximum of five members.  The primary responsibility of the fiscal council is to review management’s activities and the company’s financial statements, and to report its findings to the company’s shareholders.  Brazilian Corporate Law requires fiscal council members to receive as remuneration at least 10.0% of the average annual amount paid to the company’s executive officers, excluding benefits and profit sharing.  Noncontrolling holders of common shares owning in aggregate at least 10.0% of the common shares outstanding may also elect one member of the fiscal council.

Under Brazilian Corporate Law, our fiscal council may not include members who are on our Board of Directors, are on the board of executive officers, are employed by us or a controlled company or a company of the same group, or are spouses or relatives of any member of our management or Board of Directors.  Our fiscal council elected at our shareholders’ meeting held on April 12th, 2012, with a mandate of one year, is composed of five members:  José Reinaldo Magalhães (Chairman), Daniela Corci Cardoso (Financial Expert), Adalgiso Fragoso de Faria, Wilton de Medeiros Daher and Carlos Alberto Cardoso Moreira.

In accordance with the listed company audit committee rules of the NYSE and the SEC, on June 8, 2005 our Board of Directors designated and empowered our fiscal council to perform the role of the audit committee in reliance on the exemption set forth in Exchange Act Rule 10A-3(c)(3).

Advisory Committees

The chairperson of each of the following committees reports on activities at the Board of Directors’ monthly meetings.  However, the committees do not have decision-making authority and their recommendations are not binding upon the Board of Directors.

Management Processes Committee.  Our Management Processes Committee is responsible for assisting the Board of Directors by:  (i) evaluating the validity of the information disclosed to the Board of the Directors, (ii) preparing proposals to improve business management procedures and (iii) coordinating internal audits and preparing improvement proposals.  The members of this committee are Francisco Caprino Neto, Luiz Cláudio da Silva Barros and Martin Roberto Glogowsky.

Human Resources Management Committee.  Our Human Resources Management Committee is responsible for assisting the Board of Directors by:  (i) coordinating the CEO selection process, (ii) defining criteria for compensation of the executive officers, including long and short‑term incentive plans, (iii) defining performance goals of the executive officers, (iv) coordinating evaluation procedures of the executive officers, (v) preparation of the plan of succession for members of the executive officers and (vi) monitoring the execution of human resources policies and practices and preparing improvement proposals when necessary.  The members of this committee are Ivan de Souza Monteiro, Francisco Caprino Neto and Carlos Alberto Cardoso Moreira.

Related Parties Committee.  Our Related Parties Committee is responsible for assisting the Board of Directors by:  (i) evaluating the selection procedures of suppliers and third-party construction and other services from related parties and ensuring these transactions are conducted fairly and consistent with market practice and (ii) evaluating energy purchase or sale agreements with related parties ensuring these transactions are conducted fairly and consistent with market practice.  The members of this committee are Susana Hanna Stiphan Jabra, Daniela Corci Cardoso, Luiz Cláudio da Silva Barros and Helena Kerr do Amaral.

89

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

In addition to the advisory committees, our Board of Directors has created ad hoc commissions since 2006, such as Corporate Governance Commission, Strategy Commission, Budget Commission, Risk Management Commission, Sustainability Commission, Financial Services Commission, Energy Acquisition Commission, Projects Evaluation Commission IFR Commission, etc. and may create others, if necessary.

Compensation

Under Brazilian Corporate Law, our shareholders are responsible for establishing the aggregate amount we pay to the members of our Board of Directors and our executive officers.  Once our shareholders establish an aggregate amount of compensation for our Board of Directors and executive officers, the Human Resources Management Committee of our Board of Directors is then responsible for setting individual compensation levels.

On July 25, 2012, our Board of Directors approved a long-term incentive plan based on “phantom stocks.”  Pursuant to this plan, if the price of our shares reaches certain targets after an established grace period, the beneficiaries may receive bonus in cash.  In no event, beneficiaries will receive bonus in stock.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, the aggregate compensation, including cash and benefits-in-kind, that we paid to the members of our Board of Directors, our executive officers and members of our fiscal council was approximately R$34 million, including R$14 million in variable compensation.  For the same period, the total amount set aside or accrued by the company to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits was approximately R$1 million.

The approved compensation for our board of directors, board of executive officers and fiscal council for 2013 is R$31 million.

The following tables set forth the compensation from CPFL Energia on a non‑consolidated basis of our management for the year ended December 31, 2012 and the approved compensation for 2013.  Our directors and officers receive additional compensation from our subsidiaries which is not reflected in these tables.

 

Compensation for the year ended December 31, 2012

Management Bodies

Board of Directors

Fiscal Council

Executive Officers

Total

Number of members

6.17 members(1)

5.08 members(1)

5.75 members(1)

 

Fixed annual compensation:

(in thousands of reais

Wage

1,196

608

2,680

4,484

Direct or indirect benefits

-

-

25

25

Compensation for participation in committees

96

-

-

96

Others

258

122

2,997

3,377

Variable compensation:

-

-

-

-

Bonus

-

-

3,795

3,795

Profit sharing plan

-

-

-

-

Compensation for participation in meetings

-

-

-

-

Commissions

-

-

-

-

Others

-

-

2,861

2,861

Post-employment benefits

-

-

514

514

Compensation based on stock options

-

-

1,484

1,484

Compensation for each body (2)

-

-

-

-

Total compensation

1,550

730

14,356

16,636

         

 

                                                               


(1)           Represents the weighted average number of members.

(2)           Compensation amounts include charges and accruals.

 

 

 

90

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

Approved compensation for the year ended on December 31, 2013

Management Bodies

Board of Directors

Fiscal Council

Executive Officers

Total

Number of members

7 members

5 members

6 members

 

Fixed annual compensation:

(in thousands of reais

Wage

1,529

677

5,847

8,052

Direct or indirect benefits

-

-

79

79

Compensation for participation in committees

-

-

-

-

Others

306

135

513

954

Variable compensation:

-

-

-

-

Bonus

-

-

3,858

3,858

Profit sharing plan

-

-

-

-

Compensation for participation in meetings

-

-

-

-

Commissions

-

-

-

-

Others

-

-

952

952

Post-employment benefits

-

-

499

499

Compensation based on stock options

-

-

491

491

Compensation for each body(1)

-

-

-

-

Total compensation

1,835

812

12,238

14,885

                                                               


(1)           Compensation amounts include charges and accruals.

 

The table below sets forth the compensation of our management received from our subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2012.

 

Year ended December 31, 2012

 

Board of Directors

Fiscal Council

Executive Officers

 

Fixed

Fixed

Total (fixed and variable)

 

(in thousands of reais

Subsidiaries(1)

-

-

10,430

 


(1)           Compensation amounts include charges and accruals.

Share Ownership

The total number of common shares owned by our directors and executive officers as of March 31, 2013 was 72,077.  None of our directors or executive officers beneficially owns one percent or more of our common shares.

Indemnification of Officers and Directors

Neither the laws of Brazil nor our bylaws provide for specific indemnification of directors or officers.  We have held directors’ and officers’ liability insurance since February 2006.

Employees

As of December 31, 2012, we had 8,477 full time employees (including the employees of our jointly‑controlled subsidiaries).  The following table sets forth the number of our employees and a breakdown of employees by category of activity as of the dates indicated in each area of our operations.

 

As of December 31,

 

2012

2011

2010

Distribution

5,466

6,043

6,040

Generation

423

527

351

Commercialization

1,653

493

616

Services

1,589

-

-

Corporate staff

935

850

917

Total

8,477

7,913

7,924

 

91

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Part of our employees are members of unions, with which we have collective bargaining agreements.  We renegotiate these agreements annually with the 16 principal unions that represent our various employee groups.  Salary increases are generally provided for on an annual basis.  We believe that we have good relationships with these unions, as evidenced by the fact that we have not had any labor strikes during the last 24 years that materially affected our operations.

We provide a number of benefits to our employees.  The most significant is the sponsorship of Fundação CESP, in partnership with ten other electrical companies, which supplements the Brazilian government retirement and health benefits available to the employees of our subsidiaries CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga, CPFL Geração and CPFL Brasil.

In accordance with Brazilian law and our compensation policy, our employees are eligible for our profit sharing program.  This amount is set in the collective bargaining agreements of each company, which are adjusted annually.  In 2012, we reserved R$57 million (R$49 million of which are booked in current liabilities) for our employee profit sharing program.

In addition, part of each employee’s compensation is linked to performance goals.  Employees are evaluated based on criteria such as quality of work product, adherence to safety protocols and productivity.  Our performance evaluation system is designed to evaluate required skill as well, and enables us to evaluate the development of our employees.

ITEM 7.                        Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

Major Shareholders

The following table sets forth information relating to the beneficial ownership of our common shares by our major shareholders (beneficial owners of 5.0% or more of our common shares) as of December 31, 2012.  Percentages in the following table are based on 962,274,260 outstanding common shares. 

 

Common Shares

(%)

BB Carteira Livre I FIA (1)

288,569,602

29.99

Caixa de Previdência dos Funcionários do Banco do Brasil - Previ (2)

9,897,860

1.03

VBC Energia S.A. (3)

9,897,860

1.03

Camargo Correa S.A. (4)

12,642,390

1.31

ESC Energia S.A. (5)

224,195,070

23.30

Energia São Paulo FIA (6)

115,118,250

11.96

Bonaire Participações S.A. (7)

6,308,790

0.66

Bradespar S.A. (8)

50,541,820

5.25

BNDES Participações S.A. (9)

81,053,460

8.42

Executive officers and directors as a group

47,610

0.00

Total

798,272,712

82.96

                                                               


(1)           BB Carteira Livre I – Fundo de Investimentos em Ações is an investment fund that belongs to PREVI, a pension fund sponsored by Banco do Brasil S.A.  The Brazilian government owns a majority of the voting capital of Banco do Brasil.  During 2009, the shareholder 521 Participações S.A., in compliance with the decision of its final controlling shareholder (Caixa de Previdência dos Funcionários do Banco do Brasil – “PREVI”), restructured its equity interests in order to reduce the administrative and financial costs on its indirect investments and transferred all its shares in the Company to its controlling shareholder, Fundo BB Carteira Livre I – Fundo de Investimento em Ações.

(2)           Caixa de Previdência dos Funcionários do Banco do Brasil – Previ is a pension fund sponsored by Banco do Brasil S.A.  The Brazilian government owns a majority of the voting capital of Banco do Brasil.

(3)           VBC Energia S.A. is controlled by the Brazilian group Camargo Corrêa through several companies:  (i) Atila Holdings S.A., controlled by Construções e Comércio Camargo Corrêa S.A. and Camargo Corrêa Energia S.A.; (ii) Camargo Corrêa Energia S.A.; and (iii) Camargo Corrêa S.A. VBC Energia S.A. was also controlled by Votorantim Energia S.A. until January 2009.

(4)           Camargo Corrêa S.A. is controlled by the Brazilian group Camargo Corrêa.

(5)           ESC Energia S.A. is controlled by the Brazilian group Camargo Corrêa.

(6)           Energia São Paulo Fundo de Investimento em Ações is an investment fund whose ownership interest is controlled by four pension funds:  (i) Fundação CESP, primarily for employees of CPFL Energia, Companhia Energética de São Paulo (CESP), Eletropaulo Metropolitana Eletricidade de São Paulo S.A., Bandeirante Energia S.A. and Elektro Eletricidade e Serviços S.A., among other Brazilian electricity companies; (ii) Fundação SISTEL de Seguridade Social, primarily for employees of CPqD (Centro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento), Telecomunicações Brasileiras S.A. – Telebrás, Telemig Celular S.A., Tele Norte Celular Participações S.A., Amazônia Celular S.A.; among others telecommunications companies; (iii) Fundação Petrobras de Seguridade Social - PETROS, primarily for employees of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.; and (iv) Fundação SABESP de Seguridade Social — SABESPREV, primarily for employees of Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo — SABESP.

(7)           Bonaire Participações S.A. is a holding company controlled by Energia São Paulo Fundo de Investimento em Participações.

(8)           Bradespar S.A. is a beneficial owner of our common shares, which it indirectly holds through Antares Holdings Ltda. and Brumado Holdings Ltda.

(9)           BNDES Participações S.A. is a subsidiary of BNDES, a federal public bank linked to the Brazilian Ministry of Development, Industry and External Trade.

 

92

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Shareholders’ Agreement

 

Voting Rights.  Our shareholders’ agreement, among VBC (through ESC Energia S.A. and CCSA), PREVI (through BB Carteira Livre I FIA), Energia São Paulo FIA, Bonaire and us, as intervening and consenting party, governs control of CPFL and our subsidiaries.  Under the shareholders’ agreement, certain actions require the approval of at least VBC Energia S.A., Camargo Corrêa S.A., ESC Energia S.A., PREVI and BB Carteira Livre I FIA (at least 80.0% of the shares subject to the shareholders’ agreement), including:

·         election of the CEO and removal of any executive officer (including the CEO);

·         definition of the dividend policy;

·         creation and dissolution of controlled companies;

·         acquisition and sale of investments in other entities;

·         approval of our budget;

·         approval of our business plan;

·         capital increase within our pre‑approved authorized capital and determination of the issuance price of shares;

·         incurrence of indebtedness – including guarantees and collaterals in favor of controlled entities and invested companies – beyond the thresholds established in our budget or our business plan;

·         execution of any agreement with a global amount in excess of R$34 million, if not included in our annual budget;

·         granting of any kind of collateral or guarantee in favor of third parties;

·         execution of agreements with related parties in an amount in excess of R$8.1 million;

·         appointment of our independent auditors in certain specified cases;

·         authorization for the acquisition of our own shares for cancellation or for treasury;

·         amendment of concession agreements of any controlled entity;

·         approval of stock option plans; and

·         acquisition, sale or encumbrance of any fixed assets in an amount equal or over R$34 million.

93

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

The terms of our shareholders’ agreement relating to voting rights apply to our controlled companies and, to the fullest extent possible, to our investee companies.

Corporate Governance.  Our Board of Directors consists of seven members, appointed as follows:

·         three appointed by VBC Energia S.A./Camargo Corrêa S.A./ESC Energia S.A.;

·         two appointed by BB Carteira Livre I FIA/PREVI;

·         one appointed by Energia São Paulo FIA/Bonaire; and

·         one independent, in accordance with the Novo Mercado Listing Rules.

Our Fiscal Council consists of five members, appointed as follows:

·         two appointed by VBC Energia S.A./Camargo Corrêa S.A./ESC Energia S.A.;

·         two appointed by BB Carteira Livre I FIA/PREVI; and

·         one appointed by Energia São Paulo FIA/Bonaire.

The number of members of the Board of Directors and the Fiscal Council nominated by each party to the shareholders’ agreement is related to the current stakes of the parties in the controlling shareholder block.  If a change in the stakes of any party in the enjoined shares occurs, the number of members for which such party has the right to nominate shall be adapted to reflect such modification so as to maintain unchanged the number of members nominated by the parties whose stakes relative to the total of enjoined shares have not been altered.

If the noncontrolling shareholders, exercising their rights under the corporate law, elect the independent director required by the BM&FBOVESPA’s Novo Mercado Listing Rules, VBC Energia S.A./Camargo Corrêa S.A./ESC Energia S.A., BB Carteira Livre I FIA/PREVI and Energia São Paulo FIA/Bonaire must abstain from proposing a nominee for the position.  If the noncontrolling shareholders do not elect the independent director, VBC Energia S.A./Camargo Corrêa S.A./ESC Energia S.A., BB Carteira Livre I FIA/PREVI and Energia São Paulo FIA/Bonaire shall by joint accord nominate such an independent director.

The shareholders’ agreement also establishes the framework of the Board of Directors and Board of Executive Officers of our subsidiaries.  According to the agreement, the executive officers of the Company must be part of the Board of Directors of our subsidiaries.

Transfer of Shares.  Our shareholders’ agreement provides for certain rights and obligations in the event of transfer of shares subject to the shareholders’ agreement, or subject shares, including:

·         Right of First Refusal.  The parties to the shareholders agreement have a right of first refusal to acquire subject shares in the event one of them decides to sell its shares to a third party.

·         Tag-along Rights.  A party that decides not to exercise its right of first refusal has the option to sell (pro rata), together with the selling party, its subject shares to the acquiring third party.  Tag‑along provisions do not apply to the disposition of subject shares by Energia São Paulo FIA/Bonaire while its stake within the controlling block is lower than 20.0%.

·         Preemptive Rights.  The parties have pro rata preemptive rights to subscribe for shares in the event of a capital increase.

·         Tag-along Rights of Energia São Paulo FIA/Bonaire.  In the event of a sale, assignment or transfer of subject shares by BB Carteira Livre I FIA/PREVI and VBC Energia S.A./Camargo Corrêa S.A./ESC Energia S.A. that results in an equity percentage lower than 20.0% and 30.0%, respectively, of the aggregate subject shares and, as long as Energia São Paulo FIA/Bonaire has not exercised its right of first refusal, it will have the right to sell its entire stake of subject shares together with BB Carteira Livre I FIA/PREVI or VBC Energia S.A./Camargo Corrêa S.A./ESC Energia S.A., under the same terms and conditions.

94

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Change of Control.  In the event of direct or indirect change of control of any of the parties subject to the shareholders’ agreement, the remaining parties have the right to acquire all subject shares held, directly or indirectly, by the party undergoing the change of control, paying for such shares an amount to be determined by a recognized financial institution.

Option Agreement

Our controlling shareholders are also party to an agreement pursuant to which they have granted to each other options to purchase their respective shares in us.  In addition, this agreement provides for (i) certain notification requirements for secondary offerings of shares by such shareholders and (ii) priority to certain shareholders in the sale of shares in a secondary offering, if more than one shareholder participates in the offering and demand is less than the size of the offering.

Related Party Transactions

One of our principal shareholders is VBC Energia S.A./Camargo Corrêa S.A./ESC Energia S.A.  The controlling shareholder of VBC Energia S.A./Camargo Corrêa S.A./ESC Energia S.A. currently is the Camargo Corrêa Group and prior to January 2009 both Camargo Corrêa and the Votorantim Group were controlling shareholders.  Camargo Corrêa Group is one of the largest privately-held industrial conglomerates in Brazil, with controlling equity interests in leading Brazilian engineering and construction, cement, footwear, and textiles companies.  Camargo Corrêa Group also shares equity control of important Brazilian steel and highway concession companies, and it has equity participations in a significant Brazilian financial conglomerate and in a global aluminum company.

We acquired our interest in Semesa from VBC in December 2001 for R$496 million.  The Semesa acquisition price is subject to adjustment, based on the assessment of Semesa’s Assured Energy.  The earliest that this assessment will take place is 2015.

We also conduct transactions with the shareholders of VBC and their affiliates, including the following:

·         Our distribution subsidiaries have entered into agreements for the supply of electricity with several entities affiliated with our shareholders.  All of these electricity supply agreements are regulated by ANEEL.

·         Our commercialization subsidiaries have entered into agreements for the supply of electricity with several entities affiliated with our shareholders.

·         CPFL Geração, through BAESA, ENERCAN, CERAN and Foz do Chapecó, has entered into transactions with Construções e Comércio Camargo Corrêa S.A., a member of the Camargo Corrêa Group, for the provision of construction services to our generation subsidiaries.

Our subsidiaries CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga, CPFL Geração and CPFL Brasil are sponsors of a pension fund administered by Fundação CESP, a pension fund services company that has an indirect ownership interest in one of our shareholders, Energia São Paulo FIA.  See note 30 to our Financial Statements concerning “Transactions with Related Parties.”

ITEM 8.                        Financial Information

Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

See Item “Financial Statements.”

 

95

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Legal Proceedings   

CPFL Paulista and CPFL Piratininga are parties to numerous lawsuits brought by industrial consumers alleging that certain tariff increases in the past were illegal in view of then prevailing economic regulations that had established a price freeze that included electricity tariffs.  The aggregate potential liability was approximately R$112 million as of December 31, 2012.  Superior courts have already decided many of these lawsuits partially against us, and as a result, we have provisioned the aggregate potential liability (approximately R$4 million) in respect of these suits.

CPFL Paulista is a defendant in a civil public action filed by the Campinas Consumer Protection Office (Promotoria de Defesa do Consumidor).  The purpose of this civil public action is to suspend the effects of the tariff readjustment authorized by ANEEL for the year ended December 31, 2009.  CPFL Paulista obtained a preliminary suspension of the effects.  The civil public action still awaits final decision and, until then, the effects from the tariff readjustment authorized by ANEEL remain in force.  We believe that the risk of loss is possible.

CPFL Piratininga received a tax infraction notice regarding improper tax deductions from payments made to the Fundação CESP’s pension fund.  These payments originated from an agreement executed to pay a debt from Fundação CESP’s pension fund.  An appeal still awaits decision.  We believe that the possibility of loss is possible and the aggregate amount of the claim was of approximately R$137 million at December 31, 2012.

CPFL Piratininga filed two annulment actions concerning ICMS fiscal debts against a notice of infraction and fee drawn by the state of São Paulo questioning the company’s tax calculation method regarding the energy supply to two cities in the state.   A decision from lower courts is pending for one of them and the other one’s appeal awaits decision.  The risk of loss is possible and the aggregate amount of the claim was of approximately R$205 million at December 31, 2012.

We are also subject to legal proceedings relating to the authorization of certain of our Hydroelectric Power Plants, including a class action proposed by the federal public attorney’s office of the Municipality of Caxias do Sul challenging the validity of the environmental licensing of the Rio das Antas Hydroelectric Complex, and requesting injunctive relief against the construction of these plants.  The federal public attorney’s injunction request was denied in the lower courts and the district attorney moved against the denial, requesting a new injunction from the higher courts.  The higher courts denied the injunction relief.  The claim was deemed groundless.  An appeal from the federal public attorney’s office still awaits final decision from the higher courts.  We believe that the possibility of a loss is remote.

Semesa and Furnas were named defendants in a legal proceeding that sought remedial measures and the establishment of a nature reserve because of alleged harm caused by the construction and operation of the Serra da Mesa plant.  The amount sought from Semesa totaled R$103 million.  CPFL Geração assumed all of the outstanding obligations and potential liabilities of Semesa in March 2007.  We believe that the risk of an adverse judgment with respect to this claim is possible and a decision from the lower courts is pending.  We have not established a provision with regard to this claim.  If adverse judgment were entered against us, requiring us to purchase additional land and establish a preserve in the area surrounding our generation activities, the costs would be reflected in our property, plant and equipment.

CPFL Paulista is involved in a lawsuit challenging the deductibility of expenses recognized in 1997 related to a deficit from Fundação CESP’s pension fund.  Based on a favorable opinion that we received from the Brazilian Internal Revenue Office, CPFL Paulista deducted those expenses for purposes of income tax payments.  We made a judicial deposit in the amount of R$414 million (one deposit of R$360 million in 2007 and another one of R$5 million in 2011, adjusted to R$617 million in 2012), which allows CPFL Paulista to proceed with the lawsuit without assuming the risk of any asset seizure by the tax authority.  This deductibility also resulted in other lawsuits, and CPFL Paulista to raise defenses also entered into an agreement with a Brazilian bank to provide letters of credit through which the bank will guarantee an amount of R$270 million.  We believe that the possibility of loss is remote. 

96

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

CPFL Paulista commenced a lawsuit against ANEEL seeking annulment of the methodology applied in the periodic tariff adjustment process since the first periodic adjustment cycle (2003).  The lower court decided against CPFL Paulista, which has therefore appealed the decision. No decision on the appeal has been given to date.  In addition, CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga and RGE, as well as other Brazilian distribution companies, through ABRADEE, are plaintiffs in a lawsuit against ANEEL discussing the basis for remunerating the concession assets since the first periodic adjustment cycle.  We are currently awaiting a response from ANEEL regarding the expert’s report in the proceedings and the parties’ subsequent statements of claim.  If we succeed in any of these lawsuits, the tariffs that these distribution companies charge will increase and, as a consequence, our results of operations will be positively affected.

CPFL Geração received a tax infraction actions concerning PIS e COFINS fiscal debts due to divergence in the understandimg of legislation resulting difference in the amount paid. An appeal still awaits decision.  We believe that the possibility of loss is possible and the aggregate amount of the claim was of approximately R$196  million at December 31, 2012.

RGE is the plaintiff in a lawsuit challenging Corporate Income Tax (IRPJ) and Social Contribution (CSLL) levied in relation to events that occurred in the period from 1999 to 2003, due to:  1) excess amortization of goodwill 2) excess depreciation of assets, and 3) monetary adjustment applied on items of Parcel A (“CVA”), which were excluded from the calculation basis of corporate income tax and social contribution.  Court decision is still pending.  We believe that the risk of an unfavorable judgment with respect to this claim is possible.  Amount envolved is R$41 million.

CPFL Santa Cruz and CPFL Geração also received a tax infraction actions concerning about excess amortization of goodwill in Income Tax (IRPJ) and Social Contribution (CSLL), in the amount of R$ 36 million and R$ 164  million at December 31, 2012, respectively. An appeal still awaits decision. We believe that the possibility of loss is possible

We establish provision in our balance sheets relating to potential losses from litigation based on estimates of such losses.  For this purpose, we classify such losses as remote, possible or probable.  IFRS practices and Brazilian law require us to establish provision  in connection with probable losses and therefore, it is our policy to establish provision  only in connection with those claims.  As of December 31, 2012, our provision for contingencies were approximately R$386 million.  Our management believes that these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, either individually or in the aggregate.  See note 20 to our audited consolidated financial statements for more information on the status of our litigation.

Dividend Policy

For our policy on dividend distributions, see “Item 10.  Additional Information—Allocation of Net Income and Distribution of Dividends.”

Significant Changes

Changes in consolidation due to revision of IFRS

It is important to mention that IFRS has revised their rule of consolidation. The new standards (IFRS 10 and IFRS 11) were issued and will be take effect as from 2013. The impact for us will be to not consolidate proportionally a jointly-controlled entity and to record by equity method with no impact on income statement. Further information these changes, please see note 3 to our consolidated financial statements.

 

ITEM 9.                        The Offer and Listing

Trading Markets

Our common shares are listed on the BM&FBOVESPA, and our ADSs are listed on the New York Stock Exchange.  Each ADS represents two shares.  The ADSs commenced trading on the NYSE on September 29, 2004.  As of December 31, 2012, the ADSs represented 6.9% of our shares and 22.6% of our current global public float.

97

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

On February 23, 2011, our Board of Directors:  (i) approved a change in the ratio of our ADSs, so that each ADS would represent two common shares of CPFL Energia and (ii) submitted a proposal for a simultaneous reverse stock split and forward stock split of our common shares to our shareholders.  Our shareholders approved this proposal on our shareholders’ meeting of April 28, 2011.  Through the reverse stock split, 10 of our common shares became one common share and, simultaneously, through the forward stock split, each common share resulting from the reverse stock split became 20 common shares.

The purpose of the change in the ADS ratio, as well as the reverse and forward stock splits, is to (a) adjust the share base, and consequently decrease the administrative and operational costs of CPFL Energia; (b) improve the efficiency of our systems for recording, controlling and disclosing information to shareholders; (c) adjust the price of our common shares and ADSs, allowing access to our stock by new investors; and (d) increase the liquidity of our shares and ADSs through a decrease in their individual value.

The shares resulting from the reverse and forward stock splits were credited on July 4, 2011, based on our shareholding position on June 28, 2011.  The new ADSs resulting from the change of our ADSs’ ratio were credited on July 5, 2011, based on our ADS holding position on July 1, 2011, resulting in the issuance of two additional ADSs for each existing ADS on July 1, 2011.

Price Information

The table below sets forth reported high and low closing sale prices in reais  per common share for the periods indicated.  The table also sets forth prices in U.S. dollars per ADS based on information available from the New York Stock Exchange.  See “Item 3.  Key Information—Exchange Rates” for information with respect to exchange rates applicable during the periods indicated below.

 

Reais per Common share

U.S. dollars per ADS

 

High

Low

High

Low

 

 

 

 

 

2008

41.95

26.83

76.40

35.27

2009

37.50

28.50

66.29

35.42

2010:

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

38.48

35.36

65.55

58.30

Second Quarter

40.10

34.84

68.90

57.31

Third Quarter

44.00

38.66

76.70

67.07

Fourth Quarter

41.35

39.30

76.91

70.15

2011:

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

46.39

39.70

87.41

73.35

Second Quarter

47.60

43.50

91.69

83.26

Third Quarter(*)

22.79

19.43

29.24

22.15

Fourth Quarter (*)

26.50

19.98

28.68

22.19

2012:

 

 

 

 

First Quarter(*)

29.30

25.11

32.94

28.01

Second Quarter(*)

28.38

23.83

31.03

23.60

Third Quarter(*)

25.65

21.36

25.72

20.84

October(*)

23.68

22.07

23.31

21.51

November(*)

23.90

21.81

23.55

20.75

December(*)

22.96

21.28

21.72

20.78

2013:

 

 

 

 

January

22.16

20.15

21.66

19.83

February

20.69

19.00

21.04

19.36

March

21.49

19.85

21.70

20.03

April (up to April 12)

21.70

20.94

21.95

20.74


(*)           Prices after the change in the ratio of our ADSs and the simultaneous reverse stock split and forward stock split of our common shares.

 

98

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Corporate Governance Practices

In 2000, the BM&FBOVESPA introduced three special listing segments, known as Level 1, Level 2 and the Novo Mercado, aiming at fostering a secondary market for securities issued by Brazilian companies with securities listed on the BM&FBOVESPA, by prompting such companies to follow good practices of corporate governance.  The listing segments were designed for the trading of shares issued by companies voluntarily undertaking to abide by corporate governance practices and disclosure requirements in addition to those already imposed by Brazilian law.  These rules generally increase shareholders’ rights and enhance the quality of information provided to shareholders and stakeholders.  In order to maintain high standards of corporate governance, we have signed an agreement with the BM&FBOVESPA to list our securities on the Novo Mercado

Our corporate governance guidelines apply to us and all of our subsidiaries and affiliated companies.  They aim at promoting interaction among our shareholders, Board of Directors, Fiscal Council and Board of Executive Officers.  Our managers have committed to focus on:

1.   Disclosure (prompt and voluntary communication with market participants and our shareholders with respect to factors that guide our business and lead to the creation of value)

2.   Fairness (fair treatment to our shareholders, our customers, suppliers, employees, creditors, government bodies, regulatory agencies, etc.)

3.   Accountability (accountability of our management to our shareholders, and responsibility for their acts while in office)

4.   Compliance (commitment to the sustainability and continuity of our business in the long run, compliance with the legislation in force and observance of social and environmental matters)

We implemented this model in 2003 and redesigned it in 2006 in order to adjust our corporate governance structure to the current making-business scenario and decision-making process.

Our Board of Directors is our decision-making body, responsible for determining our overall guidelines.  Our Board of Directors can request advice on strategic matters from three of our committees, such as executive remuneration, related party transactions, follow-up on internal audits and business management processes.  Whenever necessary, ad hoc commissions are installed to advise the Board of Directors on specific issues, such as corporate governance, strategies, budget, corporate risk management, sustainability, purchase of energy, new operations and financial policies, etc.

A revision of these rules was under discussion between the companies listed in each segment and the BM&FBOVESPA, and it was approved during the second half of 2010 to provide for a further enhancement of the special corporate governance and disclosure rules.  The revised rules entered in force and effect on May 10, 2011, including those related to the Novo Mercado segment.  The main changes to the rules in the segment that we are listed include, among others:  (i) prohibition to include dispositions that restrict or create obligations to the shareholders which vote favorably to a suppression or amendment of dispositions of the bylaws; (ii) prohibition of the same individual to hold the positions of president of the board of directors and chief executive officer (or equivalent position as the main executive of the company); and (iii) obligation of the board of directors to issue a justified opinion on any tender offers for the acquisition of the shares representative of the corporate capital of the company.  On December 19, 2011, we amended our bylaws to incorporate these rules, among other changes.

In accordance with Section 303A.11 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, we have posted a summary of significant differences between the NYSE corporate governance standards and our corporate governance practices on our website, at http://www.cpfl.com.br/ir

 

99

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 10.                     Additional Information

Memorandum and Articles of Incorporation
Corporate Purpose

Our corporate purpose, as defined by our bylaws, includes:

·         fostering enterprises in the electricity generation, distribution, transmission, sale industry and related activities;

·         providing services in the electricity, telecommunications and data transmission industries, as well as providing technical, operating, administrative and financial support services, especially to affiliated or subsidiary companies; and

·         holding interest in the capital of other companies engaged in activities similar to those that we perform or which have as corporate purpose developing, fostering, sale industry, building, and/or operating projects concerning electricity generation, distribution, transmission and related services.

Qualification of Directors

Members of our board of executive officers must be resident in Brazil, but such requirement does not apply to members of our Board of Directors.  Our directors and executive officers are prevented from voting on any transaction involving companies in which they hold more than 10.0% of the total capital stock or of which they have held a management position in the period immediately prior to their taking office.

Allocation of Net Income and Distribution of Dividends

The discussion below summarizes the provisions of Brazilian law regarding the establishment of reserves by corporations and the distribution of dividends, including interest attributed to shareholders’ equity.

Mandatory Distribution

Brazilian Corporate Law generally requires that the bylaws of each Brazilian corporation specify a minimum percentage of the amounts available for distribution by such corporation for each fiscal year that must be distributed to shareholders as dividends, also known as the mandatory distribution.

Under our bylaws, at least 25.0% of our adjusted net income, as calculated under Brazilian Accounting Principles and adjusted under Brazilian Corporate Law, for the preceding fiscal year must be distributed as a mandatory annual dividend.  Adjusted net income means the distributable amount after any deductions for statutory reserves and reserves for investment projects.

Brazilian Corporate Law permits the suspension of the mandatory distribution of dividends in any fiscal year in which the management bodies report to the shareholders’ meeting that the distribution would be inadvisable in view of the company’s financial condition.  The suspension is subject to approval by the shareholders meeting and review by members of the fiscal council, if it has been installed.  The law does not establish the circumstances in which payment of the mandatory dividend would be “inadvisable” based on the company’s financial condition.  In the case of publicly-held corporations, the board of directors must file a justification for such suspension with the CVM within five days of the relevant general meeting.  If the mandatory distribution is not paid, the unpaid amount must be attributed to a special reserve account.  If not absorbed by subsequent losses, those funds must be paid out as dividends as soon as the financial condition of the company permits.  Under Brazilian Corporate Law, the shareholders of a publicly-held company may also decide to distribute dividends in an amount lower than the mandatory distribution.

Payment of Dividends

We are required by Brazilian Corporate Law to hold an annual general shareholders’ meeting by no later than April 30 of each year, at which the shareholders have to decide on the payment of an annual dividend. Additionally, interim dividends may be declared by our Board of Directors.  Pursuant to our charter, we are required to pay a mandatory annual dividend of at least 25.0% of our adjusted net income.  Any holder of record of shares at the time of a dividend declaration is entitled to receive dividends.  Dividends on shares held through a depositary are paid to the depositary for further distribution to the shareholders.  Under Brazilian Corporate Law, dividends are generally required to be paid to the holder of record on a dividend declaration date within 60 days following the date the dividend was declared, unless a shareholders’ resolution sets forth another date of payment, which, in either case, must occur prior to the end of the fiscal year in which such dividend was declared.  Pursuant to our bylaws, declared unclaimed dividends do not bear interest, are not monetarily adjusted and revert to us if unclaimed within three years after the date when we begin to pay such declared dividends. 

100

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

In general, shareholders who are not residents of Brazil must register their equity investment with the Central Bank to have dividends, sales proceeds or other amounts with respect to their shares eligible to be remitted outside of Brazil.  The common shares underlying the ADSs are held in Brazil by Banco Bradesco S.A., as the custodian for the depositary, that is the registered owner on the records of the registrar for our shares.  The current registrar (since January 1, 2011) is Banco do Brasil S.A.  The depositary registers the common shares underlying the ADSs with the Central Bank and, therefore, is able to have dividends, sales proceeds or other amounts with respect to the common shares remitted outside Brazil.

Payments of cash dividends and distributions, if any, are made in reais  to the custodian on behalf of the depositary, which then converts such proceeds into U.S. dollars for distribution to holders of ADSs.  In the event that the custodian is unable to convert immediately the Brazilian currency received as dividends into U.S. dollars, the amount of U.S. dollars payable to holders of ADSs may be adversely affected by depreciations of the Brazilian currency that occur before the dividends are converted.  Dividends paid to persons who are not Brazilian residents, including holders of ADSs, are not subject to Brazilian withholding tax, except for dividends declared based on profits generated prior to December 31, 1995, which are subject to Brazilian withholding income tax at varying tax rates.  See “Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”

Holders of ADSs have the benefit of the electronic registration obtained from the Central Bank, which permits the depositary and the custodian to convert dividends and other distributions or sales proceeds with respect to the common shares represented by ADSs into foreign currency and remits the proceeds outside of Brazil.  In the event the holder exchanges the ADSs for common shares, the holder will be entitled to continue to rely on the depositary’s certificate of registration for five business days after the exchange.  Thereafter, in order to convert foreign currency and remit outside Brazil the sales proceeds or distributions with respect to the common shares, the holder must obtain a new certificate of registration in its own name that will permit the conversion and remittance of such payments through the foreign exchange market.

If the holder is not a duly qualified investor and does not obtain an electronic certificate of foreign capital registration, a special authorization from the Central Bank must be obtained in order to remit from Brazil any payments with respect to the common shares through the foreign exchange market.  Without this special authorization, the holder may currently remit payments with respect to the common shares through the floating rate exchange market, although no assurance can be given that the floating rate exchange market will be accessible for these purposes in the future.

In addition, a holder who is not a duly qualified investor and who has not obtained an electronic certificate of foreign capital registration or a special authorization from the Central Bank may remit these payments by international transfer of Brazilian currency pursuant to CMN Resolution No. 3,568, dated May 29, 2008, and Central Bank Circular No. 3,280, dated March 9, 2005, as amended.  In order to effect the international transfer of Brazilian currency the holder must have a special non‑resident bank account in Brazil, through which the subsequent conversion of such Brazilian currency into U.S. dollars is effected.

Under current Brazilian legislation, the Brazilian government may impose temporary restrictions of foreign capital abroad in the event of a serious imbalance or an anticipated serious imbalance of Brazil’s balance of payments (see “Item 3.  Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the ADSs and Our Common Shares”).

 

101

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Interest Attributable to Shareholders’ Equity

Under Brazilian tax legislation, Brazilian companies are permitted to pay “interest” to holders of equity securities and treat such payments as an expense for Brazilian income tax purposes and for social contribution purposes.  Payment of such interest may be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors, subject to the approval of the shareholders at a general shareholders’ meeting.  In order to calculate this interest on shareholders’ equity, the TJLP is applied to shareholders’ equity for the applicable period.  The amount of any such notional “interest” payment to holders of equity securities is generally limited in respect of any particular year to the greater of:

·         50.0% of net income (after the deduction of the provisions for social contribution on net profits but before taking into account the provision for corporate income tax and the interest attributable to shareholders’ equity) for the period in respect of which the payment is made; or

·         50.0% of the sum of retained earnings and profit reserves as of the beginning of the year in respect of which such payment is made.

For accounting purposes, although the interest charge must be reflected in the statement of operations to be tax‑deductible, the charge is reversed before calculating net income in the statutory financial statements and deducted from shareholders’ equity in a manner similar to a dividend.  Any payment of interest in respect of common shares (including the holders of the ADSs) is subject to Brazilian withholding tax at the rate of 15.0%, or 25.0% in the case of a shareholder domiciled in a tax haven.  See “Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”  If such payments are accounted for, at their net value, as part of any mandatory dividend, the tax is paid by the company on behalf of its shareholders, upon distribution of the interest.  If we distribute interest attributed to shareholder’s equity in any year, and that distribution is not accounted for as part of mandatory distribution, Brazilian income tax would be borne by the shareholders.  For IFRS accounting purposes, interest attributable to shareholders’ equity is reflected as a dividend payment.

Under our bylaws, interest attributable to shareholders’ equity may be treated as a dividend for purposes of the mandatory dividend.

We will distribute R$1,096 million to our shareholders from our 2012 net income.  Of this amount, R$640 million, or R$0.665339515 per common share, was paid as an interim dividend on September 28, 2012 and R$456 million, or R$0.473778718 per common share is expected to be paid as supplemental dividend in April 2013   

Dividend Policy

We intend to declare and pay dividends and/or interest attributed to shareholders’ equity in amounts of at least 50.0% of our adjusted net income, in semi-annual installments.  The amount of any of our distributions of dividends and/or interest attributed to shareholders’ equity will depend on a series of factors, such as our financial conditions, prospects, macroeconomic conditions, tariff adjustments, regulatory changes, growth strategies and other matters our Board of Directors and our shareholders may consider relevant.  In addition, covenants contained in our debt instruments may limit the amount of dividends and/or interest attributable to shareholders’ equity that we may make.  Within the context of our tax planning, we may in the future determine that it is to our benefit to distribute interest attributable to shareholders’ equity in lieu of dividends.

Our Board of Directors may approve the distribution of dividends and/or interest attributed to shareholders’ equity, calculated based on our annual or semi-annual financial statements or on financial statements relating to shorter periods, or also based on accrued profits recorded or on profits allocated to non‑profits reserve accounts in the annual or semi-annual financial statements.  The declaration of annual dividends, including dividends in excess of the mandatory distribution, requires approval by the vote of the majority of the holders of our common shares.

Shareholder Meetings
Actions to be taken at our shareholders’ meetings

At our shareholder meetings, shareholders are generally empowered to take any action relating to our corporate purpose and to pass such resolutions as they deem necessary.  The approval of our financial statements and the determination of the allocation of our net profits with respect to each fiscal year takes place at the annual shareholder meeting immediately following such fiscal year.  The election of our directors and members of our fiscal council, if the requisite shareholders request its establishment, typically takes place at the annual shareholders’ meeting, although under Brazilian law it may also occur at a special shareholders’ meeting.

102

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

A special shareholders’ meeting may be held concurrently with the annual shareholders’ meeting.  The following actions may only be taken at a special shareholders’ meeting:

·         amendment of our bylaws;

·         cancellation of registration with the CVM as a publicly-held company;

·         authorization of the issuance of non-convertible debentures;

·         suspension of the rights of a shareholder who has violated Brazilian Corporate Law or our bylaws;

·         acceptance or rejection of the valuation of in-kind contributions offered by a shareholder in consideration for shares of our capital stock;

·         approval of our transformation into a limited liability company (sociedade limitada) or any other corporate form;

·         delisting of our common shares from the Novo Mercado

·         appointment of a financial institution responsible for our valuation, in the event that a tender offer for our common shares is carried out in connection with a corporate transformation or delisting of our common shares from the Novo Mercado

·         approval of any merger (fusão) or consolidation (incorporação) with another company or a spin-off (cisão); 

·         approval of any dissolution or liquidation, the appointment and dismissal of the respective liquidator and the official review of the reports prepared by him or her;

·         authorization to petition for bankruptcy or judicial or extrajudicial restructuring (recuperação judicial or extrajudicial); and

·         approval of stock option plans to managers or employees of the Company and its subsidiaries.

According to Brazilian Corporate Law, neither a company’s bylaws nor actions taken at a shareholders’ meeting may deprive a shareholder of some specific rights, such as:

·         the right to participate in the distribution of profits;

·         the right to participate in any remaining residual assets in the event of liquidation of the company; 

·         the right to preemptive rights in the event of subscription of shares, convertible debentures or subscription warrants (bônus de subscrição), except in some specific circumstances under Brazilian law described in “—Preemptive Rights;” and

·         the right to withdraw from the company in the cases specified in Brazilian Corporate Law, described in “Withdrawal Rights.”

Quorum

As a general rule, Brazilian Corporate Law provides that a quorum for purposes of a shareholders’ meeting shall consists of shareholders representing at least 25.0% of a company’s issued and outstanding voting capital on the first call and, if that quorum is not reached, any percentage on the second call.  A quorum for the purposes of amending our bylaws consists of shareholders representing at least two-thirds of our issued and outstanding voting capital on the first call and any percentage on the second call.

103

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

As a general rule, the affirmative vote of shareholders representing at least the majority of our issued and outstanding common shares present in person or represented by proxy at a shareholders’ meeting is required to ratify any proposed action, with abstentions not taken into account.  However, the affirmative vote of shareholders representing one-half of our issued and outstanding voting capital is required to:

·         reduce the percentage of mandatory dividends;

·         change our corporate purpose;

·         merge us with another company or consolidate us with another company;

·         spin off a portion of our assets or liabilities;

·         approve our participation in a group of companies (as defined in Brazilian Corporate Law);

·         apply for cancellation of any voluntary liquidation; and

·         approve our dissolution.

According to our bylaws and for so long as we are listed on the Novo Mercado, we may not issue preferred shares or founders’ shares and, to delist ourselves from the Novo Mercado, we will have to conduct a tender offer.

Notice of our Shareholders’ Meetings

Notice of our shareholders’ meetings must be published at least three times in the Diário Oficial do Estado de São Paulo, the official newspaper of the state of São Paulo, and in the newspaper Valor Econômico.  The first notice must be published no later than 15 days before the date of the meeting on the first call, and no later than eight days before the date of the meeting on the second call.  However, in certain circumstances, the CVM may require that the first notice be published 30 days in advance of the meeting.

Documents and Information

The specific documents and information requested for the exercise of the voting rights of our shareholders shall be made available by electronic means at the CVM and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission websites, as well as at our investor relationship website.  The following matters require specific documents and information:

·         matters with Interest of Related Parties;

·         ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting;

·         election of members of the Board of Directors;

·         compensation of the Management of the Company;

·         amendment to the Company’s Bylaws;

·         capital Increase or Capital Reduction;

·         issuance of Debentures or Subscription Bonuses;

·         issuance of preferred Shares;

·         change of the mandatory dividend distribution;

104

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

·         acquisition of the control of another company;

·         appointment of Evaluators; and/or

·         any matter which entitles the shareholders to exercise their withdrawal right.

Location of our Shareholders’ Meetings

Our shareholders’ meetings take place at our head offices in the city of São Paulo, state of São Paulo.  Brazilian Corporate Law allows our shareholders to hold meetings outside our head offices in the event of force majeure, provided that the meetings are held in the City of São Paulo and the relevant notice contains a clear indication of the place where the meeting will occur.

Who May Call our Shareholders’ Meetings

In addition to our Board of Directors, shareholders’ meetings may also be called by:

·         any shareholder, if our directors fail to call a shareholders’ meeting within 60 days after the date they were required to do so under applicable laws and our bylaws;

·         shareholders holding at least five percent of our capital stock, if our directors fail to call a meeting within eight days after receipt of a request to call the meeting by those shareholders indicating the proposed agenda; and

·         our fiscal council, if one is in place, if the Board of Directors delays calling an annual shareholders’ meeting for more than one month.  The fiscal council may also call a special shareholders’ meeting any time if it believes that there are important or urgent matters to be addressed.

Conditions of Admission

Shareholders attending our shareholders’ meeting must provide their identification cards and produce proof of ownership of the shares they intend to vote.

A shareholder may be represented at a shareholders’ meeting by a proxy, as long as the proxy is appointed less than a year before the shareholders’ meeting.  The proxy must be a shareholder, an officer of the corporation, a lawyer or a financial institution.  An investment fund must be represented by its investment fund officer.  The Company and/or its shareholders may also carry out a public proxy request directed to all shareholders with voting rights.

Since 2008, the Company has been adopting a Manual for Participation in General Shareholders’ Meetings to provide, in a clear and summarized form, information relating to the Company’s Shareholders General Meeting and to encourage and facilitate the participation of all shareholders.  This manual includes a standard power of attorney, which may be used by shareholders who are unable to be present at the meetings to appoint an attorney-in-fact to exercise their voting rights with regard to issues on the agenda.

Voting Rights of ADS Holders

ADS holders may instruct the depositary to vote the number of common shares that their ADSs represent.  The depositary will notify those holders of shareholders’ meetings and arrange to deliver our voting materials to them upon our request.  Those materials will describe the matters to be voted on and explain how the ADS holders may instruct the depositary how to vote.  For instructions to be valid, they must reach the depositary by a date set by the depositary.

We cannot assure ADS holders that they will receive the voting materials or otherwise learn of an upcoming shareholders’ meeting in time to ensure that they can instruct the depositary to vote their common shares.  In addition, the depositary and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out voting instructions or for the manner of carrying out voting instructions.  This means that ADS holders may not be able to exercise their right to vote and there may be nothing that they can do if their shares are not voted as they requested.

 

105

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Preemptive Rights

Our shareholders have a general preemptive right to subscribe for shares in any capital increase according to the proportion of their shareholdings.  Our shareholders also have a general preemptive right to subscribe for any convertible debentures, rights to acquire our shares and subscription warrants that we may issue.  In accordance with our bylaws, in the case of a private placement, a period of at least 30 days following the publication of notice of the capital increase is allowed for the exercise of the preemptive right.  In the case of a public offering, the issuance may occur with or without the exercise of preemptive rights or with a reduced term for the exercise of preemptive rights.  Under Brazilian Corporate Law, holders are permitted to transfer or dispose of their preemptive right for consideration.

In addition, Brazilian Corporate Law allows for companies’ bylaws to give the board of directors the power to exclude preemptive rights or reduce the exercise period of such rights with respect to the issuance of new shares, debentures convertible into shares and subscription warrants up to the limit of the authorized share capital if the distribution of those shares is effected through a stock exchange, through a public offering or through an exchange of shares in a public offering the purpose of which is to acquire control of another company.

Withdrawal Rights

Brazilian Corporate Law grants our shareholders the right to withdraw from the company in case they disagree with decisions taken in shareholder’s meetings concerning the following matters:  (i) the reduction of minimum mandatory dividends; (ii) the merger of the company or consolidation with another company; (iii) the change of the corporate purpose of the company; (iv) a spinoff of the company (if such spin-off changes the company’s corporate purpose, reduces mandatory dividends or results in the company joining a group of entities); or (v) the acquisition by us of the control of another company for a price that exceeds the limits established in paragraph two of Article 256 of Brazilian Corporate Law; or (vi) a change in our corporate form.  Even shareholders who did not vote or were not present at the relevant meeting may exercise this withdrawal right.

If our shareholders wish to withdraw from the company due to a merger, such right may only be exercised provided that the company’s shares have no liquidity in the market.

The withdrawal right entitles the shareholder to the reimbursement of the value of its shares, upon request within 30 days of the publication of notice of the shareholders meeting.  After such term, the company’s management bodies may choose to call a general meeting to ratify or reconsider the decision which triggered the withdrawal rights, should the payment of such rights threaten the financial stability of the company.

Material Contracts

For information concerning our material contracts, see “Item 4.  Information on the Company” and “Item 5.  Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”

Exchange Controls and Other Limitations Affecting Security Holders

There are no restrictions on ownership of our capital stock by individuals or legal entities domiciled outside Brazil.  However, the right to convert dividend payments and proceeds from the sale of common shares into foreign currency and to remit such amounts outside Brazil is subject to restrictions under foreign investment legislation which generally requires, among other things, that the relevant investment be registered with the Central Bank.  These restrictions on the remittance of foreign capital abroad could hinder or prevent the custodian for the common shares represented by American Depositary Shares, or holders who have exchanged American Depositary Shares for common shares, from converting dividends, distributions or the proceeds from any sale of common shares into U.S. dollars and remitting such U.S. dollars abroad.  Delays in, or refusal to grant any required government approval for conversions of Brazilian currency payments and remittances abroad of amounts owed to holders of American Depositary Shares could adversely affect holders of American depositary receipts – ADRs.

Resolution No. 1,927/1992 of the National Monetary Council, which is the restated and amended Annex V to Resolution No. 1,289/1987, which we call the Annex V Regulations, provides for the issuance of depositary receipts in foreign markets in respect of shares of Brazilian issuers.  It provides that the proceeds from the sale of American Depositary Shares by holders of American depositary receipts outside Brazil are free of Brazilian foreign investment controls and holders of American Depositary Shares who are not resident in a tax haven jurisdiction (i.e. a country or location that does not impose taxes on income or where the maximum income tax rate is lower than 20.0%, or where the legislation imposes restrictions on disclosure of the shareholding composition or the ownership of the investment) will be entitled to favorable tax treatment.

106

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

An electronic registration has been issued by the custodian in the name of Deutsche Bank, the depositary, with respect to the American Depositary Shares.  Pursuant to this electronic registration, the custodian and the depositary are able to convert dividends and other distributions with respect to the common shares represented by American Depositary Shares into foreign currency and to remit the proceeds outside Brazil.  If a holder exchanges American Depositary Shares for common shares, the holder may continue to rely on the custodian’s electronic registration for only five business days after the exchange.  After that, the holder must seek to obtain its own electronic registration with the Central Bank under Law No. 4,131/1962 or Resolution No. 2,689/2000.  Thereafter, unless the holder has registered its investment with the Central Bank, such holder may not convert into foreign currency and remit outside Brazil the proceeds from the disposition of, or distributions with respect to, such common shares.  A holder that obtains an electronic registration generally will be subject to less favorable Brazilian tax treatment than a holder of American Depositary Shares.  See “—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”

Under Brazilian law, whenever there is a serious imbalance in Brazil’s balance of payments or reasons to foresee a serious imbalance, the Brazilian government may impose temporary restrictions on the remittance to foreign investors of the proceeds of their investments in Brazil, and on the conversion of Brazilian currency into foreign currencies.  Such restrictions may hinder or prevent the custodian or holders who have exchanged American Depositary Shares for underlying common shares from converting distributions or the proceeds from any sale of such shares, as the case may be, into U.S. dollars and remitting such U.S. dollars abroad.

Taxation   

The following discussion summarizes the material Brazilian and U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common shares or ADSs, but it does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to purchase, own or dispose of common shares or ADSs.  The summary is based upon the tax laws of Brazil and regulations thereunder and on the tax laws of the United States and regulations thereunder as in effect on the date hereof, which are subject to change (possibly on a retroactive basis) and different interpretations.  Holders of common shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common shares or ADSs.

Although there is currently  no income tax treaty between Brazil and the United States, the tax authorities of the two countries have had discussions that may culminate in such a treaty.  No assurance can be given, however, as to whether or when a treaty will enter into force or how it will affect the U.S. holders (as defined below) of common shares or ADSs.  Prospective holders of common shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common shares or ADSs in their particular circumstances.

Brazilian Tax Considerations   

The following discussion summarizes the material Brazilian tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common shares or ADSs by a holder that is not domiciled in Brazil for purposes of Brazilian taxation, or a Non‑Brazilian Holder.

Pursuant to Brazilian law, foreign investors may invest in common shares under Resolution No. 2,689 of the National Monetary Council, or Resolution No. 2,689.

Resolution No. 2,689 allows foreign investors to invest in almost all financial assets and to engage in almost all transactions available in Brazilian financial and capital markets, provided that some requirements are fulfilled.  In accordance with Resolution No. 2,689, the definition of foreign investor includes individuals, legal entities, mutual funds and other collective investment entities, domiciled or headquartered abroad.

107

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Pursuant to Resolution No. 2,689, foreign investors must:  (i) appoint at least one representative in Brazil with the power to perform actions relating to foreign investment; (ii) complete the appropriate foreign investor registration form; (iii) register as a foreign investor with the CVM; and (iv) register the foreign investment with the Central Bank.

Securities and other financial assets held by foreign investors pursuant to Resolution No. 2,689 must be registered or maintained in deposit accounts or under the custody of an entity duly licensed by the Central Bank or the CVM.  In addition, securities trading is restricted to transactions carried out in stock exchanges or organized over‑the-counter markets licensed by the CVM, except for transfers resulting from a corporate reorganization, occurring upon the death of an investor by operation of law or will or as a consequence of the delisting of the relevant shares from a stock exchange and the cancellation of the registration with the CVM.

Taxation of Dividends

Dividends, including dividends in kind, paid by us to the depositary in respect of the common shares underlying the ADSs or to a Non‑Brazilian Holder in respect of common shares generally will not be subject to Brazilian withholding income tax provided that they are paid out of profits generated as of or after January 1, 1996.  Dividends paid out of profits generated before January 1, 1996 may be subject to Brazilian income tax withholding at varying rates, according to the tax legislation applicable to each corresponding year.

Taxation of Gains

Pursuant to Law No. 10,833, enacted on December 29, 2003, gains on the disposition or sale of assets located in Brazil by a Non-Brazilian Holder, whether to another non-Brazilian resident or to a Brazilian resident, may be subject to income tax withholding in Brazil.

 

With respect to the disposition of our common shares, as they are assets located in Brazil, the Non-Brazilian Holder should be subject to income tax on the gains assessed, following the rules described below, regardless of whether the transactions are conducted in Brazil or with a Brazilian resident.

 

With respect to our ADSs, arguably the gains realized by a Non-Brazilian Holder upon the disposition of ADSs to another non-Brazilian resident will not be taxed in Brazil, on the basis that ADSs are not “assets located in Brazil” for the purposes of Law No. 10,833. We cannot assure you, however, that the Brazilian tax authorities or the Brazilian courts will agree with this interpretation. As a result, gains on a disposition of ADSs by a Non-Brazilian Holder to a Brazilian resident, or even to a non-Brazilian resident, in the event that courts determine that ADSs would constitute assets located in Brazil, may be subject to income tax in Brazil according to the rules applicable to our common shares, described above.

 

As a general rule, gains realized as a result of a disposition of our common shares or ADSs are the positive difference between the amount realized on the transaction and the acquisition cost of our common shares or ADSs.

 

Under Brazilian law, however, income tax rules on such gains may vary depending on the domicile of the Non-Brazilian Holder, the type of registration of the investment by the Non-Brazilian Holder with the Central Bank and how the disposition is carried out, as described below.

 

Gains realized on a disposition of shares carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange (which includes the organized over-the-counter market) are:

 

·         exempt from income tax when realized by a Non-Brazilian Holder that (1) has registered the investment in Brazil with the Central Bank under the rules of Resolution 2,689 (a “2,689 Holder”), and (2) is not a resident in a country or location which is defined as a “Favorable Tax Jurisdiction” for this purposes as described below; or

·         subject to income tax at a rate of 15% in the case of gains realized by (A) a Non-Brazilian Holder that (1) is not a 2,689 Holder and (2) is not a Favorable Tax Jurisdiction Resident; or by (B) a Non-Brazilian Holder that (1) is a 2,689 Holder, and (2) is a Favorable Tax Jurisdiction Resident.  In this case, a withholding income rate of 0.005% shall be applicable and withheld by the intermediary institution (i.e., a broker) that receives the order directly from the Non-Resident Holder, which can be later offset against any income tax due on the capital gain earned by the Non-Resident Holder; and

108

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

·         subject to income tax at a rate of up to 25% in any other case, including a case of gains assessed by a Non-Brazilian Holder that is not a 2,689 Holder, and is a Favorable Tax Jurisdiction Resident for this purpose (as described below). In these cases, a withholding income tax of 0.005% of the sale value will be applicable and can be later offset with the eventual income tax due on the capital gain.

 

In the case of redemption of securities or capital reduction by a Brazilian corporation, such as us, the positive difference between the amount effectively received by the Non-Brazilian Holder and the corresponding acquisition cost is treated, for tax purposes, as capital gain derived from sale or exchange of shares not carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange, and is therefore subject to income tax at the rate of 15% or 25%, as the case may be.

 

The deposit of our common shares in exchange for ADSs will be subject to Brazilian income tax if the acquisition cost of the shares is lower than (1) the average price per share on a Brazilian stock exchange on which the greatest number of such shares were sold on the day of deposit, or (2) if no shares were sold on that day, the average price on the Brazilian stock exchange on which the greatest number of shares were sold in the 15 trading sessions immediately preceding such deposit. In this case, the difference between the acquisition cost and the average price of the shares calculated as above will be considered to be a capital gain subject to withholding income tax at the rate of 15% or 25%, as the case may be. In some circumstances, there may be arguments to claim that this taxation is not applicable, including the case of a Non-Brazilian Holder that is a 2,689 Holder and is not a resident in a “Favorable Tax Jurisdiction” for this purpose. The availability of these arguments to any specific holder of our common shares will depend on the circumstances of the holder. Prospective holders of our common shares should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of the deposit of our common shares in exchange for ADSs.

 

Any exercise of preemptive rights relating to our common shares or ADSs will not be subject to Brazilian taxation. Any gain on the sale or assignment of preemptive rights relating to our common shares, including the sale or assignment carried out by the depositary, on behalf of Non-Brazilian Holders of ADSs, will be subject to Brazilian income taxation according to the same rules applicable to the sale or disposition of our common shares.

 

Interpretation of the Discussion on the Definition of “Favorable Tax Jurisdiction”

 

On June 4, 2010, Brazilian tax authorities enacted Normative Instruction No. 1,037 listing (i) the countries and jurisdictions considered as Favorable Tax Jurisdiction or where local legislation does not allow access to information related to the shareholding composition of legal entities to their ownership or to the identity of the effective beneficiary of the income attributed to non-residents (Tax Haven Jurisdictions ) and (ii) the privileged tax regimes, whose definition is provided by Law No. 11,727, of June 23, 2008. Although we believe that the best interpretation of the current tax legislation could lead to the conclusion that the above mentioned “privileged tax regime” concept should apply solely for purposes of Brazilian transfer pricing and thin capitalization rules, we cannot assure you whether subsequent legislation or interpretations by the Brazilian tax authorities regarding the definition of a “privileged tax regime” provided by Law No. 11,727 will also apply to a Non-Brazilian Holder on payments potentially made by a Brazilian source.

 

We recommend prospective investors consult their own tax advisors from time to time to verify any possible tax consequences arising of Normative Ruling No. 1,037 and Law No. 11,727. If the Brazilian tax authorities determine that the concept of “privileged tax regime” provided by Law No. 11,727 will also apply to a Non-Resident Holder on payments potentially made by a Brazilian source the withholding income tax applicable to such payments could be assessed at a rate up to 25%.

Interest Attributable to Shareholders’ Equity.  Law No. 9,249, dated December 26, 1995, as amended, allows a Brazilian corporation, such as us, to make distributions to shareholders of interest on shareholders’ equity, and treat those payments as a deductible expense for purposes of calculating Brazilian corporate income tax, and, since 1998, social contribution on net profit as well, as long as the limits described below are observed. These distributions may be paid in cash. For tax purposes, the deductible amount of this interest is limited to the daily pro rata variation of the TJLP, as determined by the Brazilian Central Bank from time to time, and the amount of the deduction may not exceed the greater of:

109

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

·         50% of net income (after the deduction of social contribution on net profit but before taking into account the provision for corporate income tax and the amounts attributable to shareholders as interest on shareholders’ equity) for the period in respect of which the payment is made; and

 

·         50% of the sum of retained profits and income reserves as of the date of the beginning of the period in respect of which the payment is made.

Payment of interest on shareholders’ equity to a Non-Brazilian Holder is subject to withholding income tax  at the rate of 15%, or 25% if the Non-Brazilian Holder is domiciled in a Favorable Tax Jurisdiction.

 

These payments of interest on shareholders’ equity  to a Non-Brazilian Holder may be included, at their net value, as part of any mandatory dividend. To the extent payment of interest on net equity is so included, we are required to distribute to shareholders an additional amount to ensure that the net amount received by them, after payment of the applicable income tax withholding, is at least equal to the mandatory dividend.

 

Payments of interest on shareholders’ equity are decided by our shareholders, at on annual shareholders meeting, on the basis of recommendations of on board of directors. No assurance can be given that our board of directors will not recommend that future distributions of profits should be made by means of interest on shareholders’ equity instead of by means of dividends.

Tax on foreign exchange transactions

The conversion of foreign currency into Brazilian reais  and the conversion of Brazilian reais  into foreign currency are subject to a tax on foreign exchange transactions (“IOF/Exchange”).  The rate of this tax varies according to the nature of the transaction.  Foreign exchange agreements entered into as of October 20, 2009 in connection with inflows of funds related to investments carried out by Non-Brazilian Holders in the Brazilian financial and capital markets are subject to the IOF/Exchange Tax at a rate of 6.0%. However, currently there are certain transactions subject to the rate of 0%, as it is the case with the inflow of funds in connection to variable income investments carried out within the Brazilian Exchange. Foreign exchange transactions related to outflows of funds in connection with investments made in the Brazilian financial and capital markets are subject to IOF/Exchange at a zero percent rate. This zero percent rate applies to payments of dividends and interest on shareholders’ equity to Non-Brazilian Holders with respect to investments in Brazilian financial and capital markets. Other than these transactions, the rate applicable to most foreign exchange transactions is 0.38%. Other rates may apply to particular transactions and the Brazilian government may increase the rate at any time up to 25.0% on the foreign exchange transaction amount. However, any increase in rates is only authorized to apply to future transactions.

Tax on transactions involving bonds and securities

Brazilian law imposes a tax on transactions involving bonds and securities (the “IOF/Bonds Tax”), including those carried out on Brazilian stock, futures or commodities exchanges.  The IOF/Bonds Tax is currently reduced to zero in almost all transactions, including those carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange. The rate of the IOF/Bonds Tax applicable to transactions involving our common shares is currently zero. However, the rate of the IOF/Bonds Tax applicable to the transfer of our common shares with the specific purpose of enabling the issuance of ADSs is currently 1.5%. This rate is applied to  the product of (1) the number of shares which are transferred, multiplied by (2) the closing price for those shares on the date prior to the transfer or, if such closing price is not available on that date, the last available closing price for those shares. The Brazilian government may increase the rate of the IOF/Bonds Tax at any time up to 1.5% per day of the transaction amount, but only in respect of transactions carried out after the increase in rate enters into effect

 

110

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Other Relevant Brazilian Taxes

There are no Brazilian inheritance, gift or succession taxes applicable to the ownership, transfer or disposition of common shares or ADSs by a Non‑Brazilian Holder except for gift and inheritance taxes levied by certain Brazilian states on gifts or inheritance bestowed by individuals or entities not resident or domiciled in Brazil or not domiciled within that state, to individuals or entities resident or domiciled within in that Brazilian state.  There are no Brazilian stamps, issue, registration or similar taxes or duties payable by holders of common shares or ADSs.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences   

This discussion is a summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common shares or ADSs.  This discussion is based on the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), its legislative history, existing final, temporary and proposed Treasury regulations, administrative pronouncements by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) and judicial decisions, in each case as of the date hereof, all of which are subject to change (possibly on a retroactive basis) and to different interpretations.

This discussion does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the U.S. federal income tax consequences that may be relevant to a particular holder (including tax considerations that arise from rules of general application to all taxpayers or to certain classes of investors or that are generally assumed to be known by investors) and holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding their specific tax situations.  This discussion applies only to holders of common shares or ADSs who hold the common shares or ADSs as “capital assets” (generally, property held for investment) under the Code and does not address the tax consequences that may be relevant to holders in special tax situations, including, for example:

·         brokers or dealers in securities or currencies;

·         U.S. holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar;

·         holders that own or have owned stock constituting 10.0% or more of our total combined voting power (whether such stock is directly, indirectly or constructively owned);

·         tax-exempt organizations;

·         regulated investment companies;

·         real estate investment trusts;

·         grantor trusts;

·         common trust funds;

·         banks or other financial institutions;

·         persons liable for the alternative minimum tax;

·         securities traders who elect to use the mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities holdings;

·         insurance companies;

·         persons that acquired common shares or ADSs as compensation for the performance of services;

·         U.S. expatriates; and

111

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

·         persons holding common shares or ADSs as part of a straddle, hedge or conversion transaction or as part of a synthetic security, constructive sale or other integrated transaction.

Except where specifically described below, this discussion assumes that we are not a passive foreign investment company (a “PFIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes.  In addition, this discussion does not address tax considerations applicable to persons that hold an interest in a partnership (or other entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) that holds common shares or ADSs, or any U.S. federal estate and gift, state, local or non‑U.S. tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common shares or ADSs.  Each holder should consult such holder’s own tax advisor concerning the overall tax consequences to it, including the consequences under laws other than U.S. federal income tax laws, of an investment in common shares or ADSs.

As used herein, the term “U.S. holder” means a beneficial owner of common shares or ADSs that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (i) an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States; (ii) a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia; (iii) an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or (iv) a trust if (A) it is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all of the substantial decisions of the trust or (B) it has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.  As used herein, the term “non‑U.S. holder” means a beneficial owner of common shares or ADSs that is neither a U.S. holder nor a partnership (or an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes).

If a partnership (or other entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) owns common shares or ADSs, the tax treatment of a partner in such partnership will generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership holding common shares or ADSs.  Partnerships that are beneficial owners of common shares or ADSs, and partners in such partnerships, should consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal, state, local and non‑U.S. tax considerations applicable to them with respect to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common shares or ADSs.

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a holder of an ADS will generally be treated as the beneficial owner of the common shares represented by the ADS.  However, see the discussion below under “Taxation of Distributions” regarding certain statements made by the U.S. Treasury Department concerning depositary arrangements.

Taxation of Distributions

The gross amount of any distributions of cash or property made with respect to common shares or ADSs (including distributions characterized as interest on shareholders’ equity for Brazilian law purposes and any amounts withheld to reflect Brazilian withholding taxes) generally will be taxable as dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles.

A U.S. holder will generally include such dividends in gross income as ordinary income on the day such dividends are actually or constructively received.  Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits will be treated first as a non‑taxable return of capital, thereby reducing the U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis (but not below zero) in common shares or ADSs, as applicable, and thereafter as either long‑term or short‑term capital gain (depending on whether the U.S. holder has held common shares or ADSs, as applicable, for more than one year as of the time such distribution is actually or constructively received).

If any cash dividends are paid in reais, the amount of a distribution paid in reais  will be the U.S. dollar value of the reais  received, calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date of actual or constructive receipt, regardless of whether the payment in reais  is in fact converted into U.S. dollars at that time.  If the reais  received as a dividend are converted into U.S. dollars on the date of actual or constructive receipt, a U.S. holder should not recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of such dividend.  If the reais  received as a dividend are not converted into U.S. dollars on the date of actual or constructive receipt, a U.S. holder will have a tax basis in the reais  equal to their U.S. dollar value on the date of receipt.  If any reais  actually or constructively received by a U.S. holder are later converted into U.S. dollars, such U.S. holder may recognize foreign currency gain or loss, which would be treated as ordinary gain or loss.  Such gain or loss generally will be treated as gain or loss from sources within the United States for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes.  U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors concerning the possibility of foreign currency gain or loss if any such reais  are not converted into U.S. dollars on the date of actual or constructive receipt.

112

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Dividends paid by us will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to corporations under the Code.  Subject to the below-mentioned concerns by the U.S. Treasury Department regarding certain inconsistent actions taken by intermediaries and certain exceptions for short‑term and hedged positions, the U.S. dollar amount of dividends received by certain U.S. holders (including individuals) with respect to the ADSs will be subject to taxation at a maximum rate of 20.0% if the dividends represent “qualified dividend income.”  Dividends paid on the ADSs will be treated as qualified dividend income if (i) the ADSs are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States and (ii) we were not, in the year prior to the year in which the dividend was paid, and are not, in the year in which the dividend is paid, a PFIC.  The ADSs are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and will qualify as readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States so long as they are so listed.  However, no assurances can be given that the ADSs will be or will remain readily tradable.  See below for a discussion regarding our PFIC determination.

Based on existing guidance, it is not entirely clear whether dividends received with respect to the common shares will be treated as qualified dividend income, because the common shares are not themselves listed on a U.S. exchange.  In addition, the U.S. Treasury Department has announced its intention to promulgate rules pursuant to which holders of common shares or ADSs and intermediaries through whom such securities are held will be permitted to rely on certifications from issuers to establish that dividends are treated as qualified dividends.  Because such procedures have not yet been issued, it is not clear whether we will be able to comply with them.  U.S. holders of common shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability of the reduced dividend tax rate in the light of their own particular circumstances.

Subject to certain limitations (including a minimum holding period requirement), a U.S. holder may be entitled to claim a U.S. foreign tax credit in respect of any Brazilian income taxes withheld on dividends received with respect to the common shares or ADSs.  A U.S. holder that does not elect to claim a credit for any foreign income taxes paid or accrued during a taxable year may instead claim a deduction in respect of such Brazilian income taxes, provided that the U.S. holder elects to deduct (rather than credit) all foreign income taxes paid or accrued for the taxable year.  Dividends received with respect to the common shares or ADSs generally will be treated as dividend income from sources outside of the United States and generally will constitute “passive category income” for U.S. foreign tax credit limitation purposes for most U.S. holders.  The rules governing foreign tax credits are complex and U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability of foreign tax credits in their particular circumstances.  The U.S. Treasury Department has expressed concern that intermediaries in connection with depositary arrangements may be taking actions that are inconsistent with the claiming of foreign tax credits by U.S. persons who are holding depositary shares.  Accordingly, U.S. holders should be aware that the discussion above regarding the ability to credit Brazilian withholding tax on dividends and the availability of the reduced tax rate for dividends received by certain non‑corporate holders above could be affected by actions taken by parties to whom the ADSs are released and the IRS.

Distributions of additional shares to holders with respect to their common shares or ADSs that are made as part of a pro rata distribution to all our shareholders generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.

Non‑U.S. holders generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or withholding tax on distributions with respect to common shares or ADSs that are treated as dividend income for U.S. federal income tax purposes unless such dividends are effectively connected with the conduct by such holders of a trade or business in the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, are attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment or fixed base).

Taxation of Sales, Exchanges or Other Taxable Dispositions

Deposits and withdrawals of common shares by U.S. holders in exchange for ADSs will not result in the realization of gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

113

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Upon the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of common shares or ADSs, a U.S. holder will generally recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized in consideration for the disposition of the common shares or ADSs (including the gross amount of the proceeds before the deduction of any Brazilian tax) and the U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in the common shares or ADSs.  The initial tax basis of common shares or ADSs held by a U.S. holder will be the U.S. dollar value of the reais-denominated purchase price determined on the date of purchase.  Such gain or loss generally will be treated as capital gain or loss and will be long‑term capital gain or loss if the common shares or ADSs have been held for more than one year at the time of the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition.  Although we do not believe that U.S. holders will be entitled to a credit or deduction with respect to any IOF/Exchange paid on common shares or ADSs (as discussed in “—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Tax on foreign exchange transactions”), U.S. holders should be entitled to include the amount of the IOF/Exchange paid as part of their initial basis in such common shares or ADSs.  Under current law, certain non‑corporate U.S. holders (including individuals) may be eligible for preferential rates of U.S. federal income tax in respect of long‑term capital gains.  The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations under the Code.

If Brazilian income tax is withheld on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of common shares or ADSs, the amount realized by a U.S. holder will include the gross amount of the proceeds of that sale, exchange or other taxable disposition before deduction of the Brazilian income tax withheld.  Capital gain or loss, if any, realized by a U.S. holder on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of common shares or ADSs generally will be treated as U.S. source gain or loss for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes.  Consequently, in the case of a gain from the disposition of common shares or ADSs that is subject to Brazilian income tax (see “—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Taxation of Gains”), the U.S. holder may not be able to benefit from the foreign tax credit for that Brazilian income tax (i.e., because the gain from the disposition would be U.S. source), unless the U.S. holder can apply the credit against U.S. federal income tax payable on other income from foreign sources.  Alternatively, the U.S. holder may take a deduction for the Brazilian income tax, provided that the U.S. holder elects to deduct all foreign income taxes paid or accrued for the taxable year.

A non‑U.S. holder will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or withholding tax on gain realized on the sale or other taxable disposition of common shares or ADSs unless (i) such non‑U.S. holder is an individual who is present in the United States  for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the sale and certain other conditions are met or (ii) such gain is effectively connected with the conduct by the non‑U.S. holder of a trade or business in the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, is attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment or fixed base).  If the first exception (i) applies, the non‑U.S. holder generally will be subject to tax at a rate of 30% on the amount by which the gains derived from the sales that are from U.S. sources exceed capital losses allocable to U.S. sources.  If the second exception (ii) applies, the non‑U.S. holder generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax with respect to the gain in the same manner as U.S. holders, as described above.  In addition, in the case of (ii), if such non‑U.S. holder is a foreign corporation, it may be subject to a branch profits tax equal to 30% (or such lower rate provided by an applicable treaty) upon the actual or deemed repatriation of its effectively connected earnings and profits for the taxable year, subject to certain adjustments.

Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules

Special U.S. federal income tax rules apply to U.S. persons owning shares of a PFIC.  In general, a non‑U.S. corporation will be classified as a PFIC for any taxable year during which, after applying relevant look through rules with respect to the income and assets of subsidiaries, either (i) 75.0% or more of the non‑U.S. corporation’s gross income is “passive income” or (ii) on average 50.0% or more of the gross value of the non‑U.S. corporation’s assets produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income.  For these purposes, passive income generally includes, among other things, dividends, interest, rents, royalties, gains from the disposition of passive assets and gains from commodities and securities transactions, other than certain active business gains from the sale of commodities (subject to various exceptions).  In determining whether a non‑U.S. corporation is a PFIC, a pro rata portion of the income and assets of each corporation in which it owns, directly or indirectly, at least 25.0% interest (by value) is taken into account.

The determination as to whether a non‑U.S. corporation is a PFIC is based on the composition of the income, expenses and assets of the non‑U.S. corporation from time to time and the application of complex U.S. federal income tax rules, which are subject to different interpretations and involves uncertainty.  Based on our audited financial statements, the nature of our business, and relevant market and shareholder data, we believe that we would not be classified as a PFIC for our last taxable year or our current taxable year (although the determination cannot be made until the end of such taxable year), and we do not expect to be classified as a PFIC in the foreseeable future, based on our current business plans and our current interpretation of the Code and Treasury regulations that are currently in effect.  However, because the application of the Code and Treasury regulations are not entirely clear and because PFIC status depends on the composition of a non-U.S. corporation’s income and assets and the market value of its assets from time to time, there can be no assurance that we will not be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year.

114

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

If, contrary to the discussion above, we are treated as a PFIC, a U.S. holder would be subject to special rules (and may be subject to increased U.S. federal income tax liability and filing requirements) with respect to (a) any gain realized on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of common shares or ADSs and (b) any “excess distribution” made by us to the U.S. holder (generally, any distribution during a taxable year in which distributions to the U.S. holder on the common shares or ADSs exceed 125% of the average annual distributions the U.S. holder received on the common shares or ADSs during the preceding three taxable years or, if shorter, the U.S. holder’s holding period for the common shares or ADSs).  Under those rules, (a) the gain or excess distribution would be allocated ratably over the U.S. holder’s holding period for the common shares or ADSs, (b) the amount allocated to the taxable year in which the gain or excess distribution is realized and to taxable years before the first day on which we  became a PFIC would be taxable as ordinary income, (c) the amount allocated to each prior year in which  we were a PFIC would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the highest tax rate in effect for that year and (d) the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of U.S. federal income tax would be imposed in respect of the tax attributable to each prior year in which  we were a PFIC.

If we are treated as a PFIC and, at any time, we invest in non‑U.S. corporations that are classified as PFICs (each, a “lower-tier PFIC”), U.S. holders generally will be deemed to own, and also would be subject to the PFIC rules with respect to, their indirect ownership interest in that lower-tier PFIC.  If we are treated as a PFIC, a U.S. holder could incur liability for the deferred tax and interest charge described above if either (i) we receive a distribution from, or dispose of all or part of our  interest in, the lower-tier PFIC or (ii) the U.S. holder disposes of all or part of its common shares or ADSs.

In general, if we are treated as a PFIC, the rules described above can be avoided by a U.S. holder that elects to be subject to a mark-to-market regime for stock in a PFIC.  A U.S. holder may elect mark-to-market treatment for its common shares or ADSs, provided the common shares or ADSs, for purposes of the rules, constitute “marketable stock” as defined in Treasury regulations.  The ADSs will be “marketable stock” for this purpose if they are regularly traded on the New York Stock Exchange, other than in de minimis quantities on at least 15 days during each calendar quarter.  A U.S. holder electing the mark-to-market regime generally would compute gain or loss at the end of each taxable year as if the common shares or ADSs had been sold at fair market value.  Any gain recognized by the U.S. holder under mark-to-market treatment, or on an actual sale, would be treated as ordinary income, and the U.S. holder would be allowed an ordinary deduction for any decrease in the value of common shares or ADSs as of the end of any taxable year, and for any loss recognized on an actual sale, but only to the extent, in each case, of previously included mark-to-market income not offset by previously deducted decreases in value.  Any loss on an actual sale of common shares or ADSs would be a capital loss to the extent in excess of previously included mark-to-market income not offset by previously deducted decreases in value.  A U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in common shares or ADSs would increase or decrease by gain or loss taken into account under the mark-to-market regime.  A mark-to-market election is generally irrevocable.  In addition, a mark-to-market election with respect to common shares or ADSs would not apply to any lower-tier PFIC, and a U.S. holder would not be able to make such a mark-to-market election in respect of its indirect ownership interest in that lower-tier PFIC.  Consequently, the PFIC rules could apply with respect to income of a lower-tier PFIC, the value of which would already have been taken into account indirectly via mark-to-market adjustments in respect of common shares or ADSs.

A U.S. holder that owns common shares or ADSs during any taxable year that we are treated as a PFIC generally would be required to file IRS Form 8621.  U.S. holders should also be aware that recently enacted legislation may broaden the current IRS Form 8621 filing requirement or impose an additional annual filing requirement for U.S. persons owning shares of a PFIC.  The legislation does not describe what information would be required to be included in either situation, but grants the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury Department power to make this determination.  U.S. holders should consult their independent tax advisors regarding the application of the PFIC rules to common shares or ADSs, the availability and advisability of making an election to avoid the adverse tax consequences of the PFIC rules should we be considered a PFIC for any taxable year and the application of the recently-enacted legislation to their particular situation.

115

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

Dividends paid on, and proceeds from the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of, common shares or ADSs to a U.S. holder generally may be subject to the information reporting requirements of the Code and may be subject to backup withholding of U.S. federal income tax (currently at a rate of 28.0%)   unless the U.S. holder (i) provides an accurate taxpayer identification number and certifies that it is a U.S. person and that no loss of exemption from backup withholding has occurred or (ii) establishes that it is an exempt recipient.  The amount of any backup withholding collected from a payment to a U.S. holder will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle the U.S. holder to a refund, provided that certain required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

In addition, U.S. holders should be aware that additional reporting requirements apply with respect to the holding of certain foreign financial assets, including stock of foreign issuers which is not held in an account maintained by certain financial institutions, if the aggregate value of all such assets exceeds US$50,000.  U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of the information reporting rules to common shares or ADSs and the application of the foreign financial asset rules to their particular situations.

Non‑U.S. holders generally will not be subject to information reporting and backup withholding tax, but may be required to comply with certain certification and identification procedures in order to establish their eligibility for such exemption.

Documents on Display

Statements contained in this annual report regarding the contents of any contract or other document are not necessarily complete, and, where the contract or other document is an exhibit to the annual report, each of these statements is qualified in all respects by the provisions of the actual contract or other documents.

We are subject to the information requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, applicable to a foreign private issuer, and accordingly, we file or furnish reports, information statements and other information with the SEC.  Reports and other information filed by us with the SEC can be inspected at, and subject to the payment of any required fees, copies may be obtained from, the public reference facilities of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.  Our filings will also be available at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

Reports and other information may also be inspected and copied at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.  As a foreign private issuer, however, we are exempt from the proxy requirements of Section 14 of the Exchange Act and from the short-swing profit recovery rules of Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

Our website is located at http://www.cpfl.com.br and our investor relations website is located at http://www.cpfl.com.br/ir.  (These URLs are intended to be an inactive textual reference only.  They are not intended to be an active hyperlink to our website.  The information on our website, which might be accessible through a hyperlink resulting from this URL is not, and shall not be deemed to be, incorporated into this annual report.)

ITEM 11.                     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk from changes in both foreign currency exchange rates and rates of interest and indexation.  We have foreign exchange rate risk with respect to our debt denominated in U.S. dollars.  We are subject to market risk deriving from changes in rates which affect the cost of our financing.

 

116

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Exchange Rate Risk

At December 31, 2012, approximately 14.2% of our indebtedness were denominated in U.S. dollars.  Also at December 31, 2012, we had swap agreements that offset the exchange rate risk with respect to R$2,464 million of those amounts.  The potential loss to us that would result from a hypothetical unfavorable 50.0% change in foreign currency exchange rates, after giving effect to the swaps, would be approximately R$14.2 million, primarily due to the increase, in Brazilian reais in the principal amount of our foreign currency indebtedness.  The total increase in our foreign currency indebtedness would be reflected as an expense in our income statement.

Risk of Index Variation

We have indebtedness and financial assets that are denominated in reais  and that bear interest at variable rates or, in some cases, are fixed.  We also have swaps that convert some U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness to reais  at variable interest rates.  The interest or indexation rates include several different Brazilian money-market rates and inflation rates.  At December 31, 2012, the amount of such liabilities, net of such assets and after giving effect to swaps, was R$12,804 million.  Further information for other scenario, please see note 33 to our consolidated financial statements.

A hypothetical, instantaneous and unfavorable change of 100 basis points in rates applicable to floating rate financial assets and liabilities held at December 31, 2012, would result in a net additional cash outflow of approximately R$128 million.  This sensitivity analysis is based on the assumption of an unfavorable 100 basis point movement of the interest rates applicable to each homogeneous category of financial assets and liabilities.  A homogeneous category is defined according to the currency in which financial assets and liabilities are denominated and assumes the same interest rate movement within each homogeneous category (e.g., U.S. dollars).  As a result, our interest rate risk sensitivity model may overstate the impact of interest rate fluctuations for such financial instruments as unfavorable movements of all interest rates are unlikely.

ITEM 12.                     Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities

American Depositary Shares
Fees and Expenses

The following table summarizes the fees and expenses payable by holders of ADSs: 

Persons depositing common shares or ADS holders must pay:

For:

US$5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs)

Issuance of ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of common shares or rights or other property

Cancellation of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, including if the deposit agreement terminates

US$2.00 (or less) per 100 ADS (to the extent not prohibited by the rules of any stock exchange on which the ADSs are listed for trading)

Any cash distribution to you

US$2.00 (or less) per 100 ADS (to the extent the depositary has not collected a cash distribution fee of US$2.00 per 100 ADS during the year)

Depositary services

Registration or transfer fees

Transfer and registration of common shares on our common share register to or from the name of the depositary or its agent when you deposit or withdraw common shares.

Expenses of the depositary

Cable, telex and facsimile transmissions (when expressly provided in the deposit agreement)

Converting foreign currency to U.S. dollars

Taxes and other governmental charges the depositary or the custodian have to pay on any ADS or common share underlying an ADS, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes

As necessary

Any charges incurred by the depositary or its agents for servicing the deposited securities

No charges of this type are currently made in the Brazilian market

 

117

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

Reimbursement of Fees and Direct and Indirect Payments by the Depositary

The depositary collects its fees for delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them.  The depositary collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees.  The depositary may collect its annual fee for depositary services by deduction from cash distributions or by directly billing investors or by charging the book-entry system accounts of participants acting for them.  The depositary may generally refuse to provide fee-attracting services until its fees for those services are paid.

In 2012, we received the following payments from the depositary:  US$12,150 and US$750,000 (or US$525,000 net of withholding income tax) for expenses incurred by us relating to the ADR program, including global shareholder identification and expenses relating to the fourth year of the agreement between the depositary and us, respectively.

ITEM 13.                     Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

None.

ITEM 14.                     Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use Of Proceeds

None.

ITEM 15.                     Controls and Procedures

We have evaluated, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2012. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon our evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management´s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

118

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, and that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 based on the criteria established in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on such assessment and criteria, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2012.

In June 2012, CPFL Energia, through its subsidiary CPFL Renováveis, acquired 100% of shares of BVP SA. Pursuant to SEC’s instructions, management may exclude an acquired business from its report on internal control over financial reporting if a registrant consummates a material purchase business combination during the relevant fiscal year. On that basis, our management excluded from its assessment the internal control over financial reporting at BVP SA whose financial statements constitute 4.6 % of total assets and 0.7% of net revenues of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012.

In September 2012, we implemented a new version of the billing system at CPFL Santa Cruz, our subsidiary, the SAP Costumer Care System (CCS). We have rigorously tested the new system before its implementation. Our management believes the new system will generate productivity gains and improve our internal processes. The changes in our business processes and internal control over financial reporting have been dully recorded and assessed by our management for the year ended December 31, 2012.

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

CPFL Energia S.A.
São Paulo - SP

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of CPFL Energia S.A. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2012, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As described in the Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management excluded from its assessment the internal control over financial reporting at BVP S.A., which was acquired in June 2012 and whose financial statements constitute 4.6% of total assets and 0.7% of net revenues of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012. Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control over financial reporting at BVP S.A.. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

 

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 of the Company and our report dated April 9, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

 

/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes

Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
April 9, 2013

 

ITEM 16.                       

ITEM 16A.                AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

As described in Item 16D below, we have given our fiscal council the necessary powers to qualify for the exemption from the audit committee requirements set forth in Exchange Act Rule 10A-3(c)(3).  Our Board of Directors recognizes that one member of our fiscal council, Daniela Corci Cardoso, qualifies as an audit committee financial expert and meets the applicable independence requirements for fiscal council membership under Brazilian law.  She also meets the New York Stock Exchange independence requirements that would apply to audit committee members in the absence of our reliance on the exemption set forth in Exchange Act Rule 10A-3(c)(3).  Some of the members of our fiscal council are currently employed by some of our principal shareholders or their affiliates.

 

119

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 16B.                CODE OF ETHICS

We have adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to our employees and our directors and executive officers, which addresses such matters as conflicts of interest, corporate opportunities, confidentiality, fair dealing, protection and proper use of company assets, compliance with laws, rules and regulations (including insider trading laws) and encouraging the reporting of any illegal or unethical behavior. Our Code of Ethics is available on our website at: http://www.b2i.cc/Document/986/CPFL_CodEtica_20061227_eng.pdf. (This URL is intended to be an inactive textual reference only. It is not intended to be an active hyperlink to our website. The information on our website, which might be accessible through a hyperlink resulting from this URL, is not and shall not be deemed to be, incorporated into this annual report).

 

We are currently working on the review of our Code of Ethics to incorporate suggestions of our employees and outside stakeholders.  We intend to submit the new version of our Code of Ethics to our boad of directors and officers for approval in the first half of 2013.   If we amend the provisions of our code of ethics that apply to our chief executive officer, our chief financial officer, our principal accounting officer and persons performing similar functions, or if we furnish a waiver to any such persons, we will disclose such amendment or waiver on our website at the same address.

 

ITEM 16C.                PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Audit and Non‑Audit Fees

The following table sets forth the fees billed to us by our independent registered and public accounting firm during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.  Our independent accounting firm was KPMG Auditores Independentes for the year ended December 31, 2011, and Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes for the year ended December 31, 2012

 

Year ended December 31,

 

2012

2011

 

(in thousands of reais

Audit fees

R$3,802

R$3,628

Audit-related fees

R$2,371

R$659

Tax fees

R$112

R$166

All other fees

-

-

Total

R$6,285 

R$4,453 

 

“Audit Fees” are the aggregated fees billed by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes and KPMG Auditores Independentes for the audit of our consolidated and annual financial statements, reviews of interim financial statements and attestation services that are provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the fiscal years of 2012 and 2011, respectively

“Audit-related fees” are fees charged by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes and KPMG Auditores Independentesfor assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements for 2012 and 2011, respectively

“Tax fees” in the above table are for services related to tax compliance charged by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes and KPMG Auditores Independentes for 2012 and 2011, respectively

Audit Committee Approval Policies and Procedures

Our fiscal council currently serves as our audit committee for purposes of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  Our fiscal council has not established pre‑approval policies or procedures for recommending the engagement of our independent auditors for services to our Board of Directors.  Pursuant to Brazilian law, our Board of Directors is responsible for the engagement of independent auditors.  Brazilian law prohibits our independent auditors from providing any consulting services to our subsidiaries, or to us, that may impair their independence.

 

120

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 16D.                EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

Under the listed company audit committee rules of the NYSE and the SEC, we must comply with Exchange Act Rule 10A-3, which requires that we establish an audit committee composed of members of the Board of Directors that meets specified requirements.  We have designated and empowered our fiscal council to perform the role of the audit committee in reliance on the exemption set forth in Exchange Act Rule 10A-3(c)(3).  In our assessment, our fiscal council acts independently in performing the responsibilities of an audit committee under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and satisfies the other requirements of Exchange Act Rule 10A-3.

ITEM 16E.                PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

None.

ITEM 16F.                 CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

KPMG Auditores Independentes was appointed to act as our independent public accounting firm for a five-year period to audit our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011.  Pursuant to CVM regulations, Brazilian public companies are required to rotate their independent public accounting firm every five years.   Due to the limitations set forth in these regulations, we did not seek to renew KPMG’s contract when it expired and KPMG could not attempt to stand for reelection.  On November 7, 2011, our Board of Directors approved the appointment of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes to act as our independent public accounting firm beginning with a review of our quarterly information for the first quarter of 2012.

KPMG Auditores Independentes’s reports on our financial statements for the each of the five fiscal years ended on December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor was it qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During such five fiscal years, there were no disagreements with KPMG Auditores Independentes, whether or not resolved, on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or scope of audit procedures, which disagreement, if not resolved to the satisfaction of KPMG Auditores Independentes, would have caused KPMG Auditores Independentes to make a reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its audit reports for such fiscal years.

We have requested that KPMG Auditores Independentes furnish us with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether or not it agrees with the above statements. A copy of this letter is filed as Exhibit 1.01 to this Form 20-F.

We did not consult Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes during our two most recent fiscal years or any subsequent interim period as to the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements or any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in Item 16F(a)(1)(iv) of Form 20-F) or a reportable event (as described in Item 16F(a)(1)(v) of Form 20-F).

 

ITEM 16G.                CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The following chart summarizes the ways that our corporate governance practices differ from those followed by domestic companies under the listing standards under the New York Stock Exchange:

Section of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual

New York Stock Exchange Listing Standard

Ways that CPFL’s Corporate Governance Practices Differ from Those Followed by Domestic Companies Listed on the New York Stock Exchange

 

 

 

303A.01

A company listed on the New York Stock Exchange (a “listed company”) must have a majority of independent directors on its Board of Directors. “Controlled companies” are not required to comply with this requirement.

CPFL is a controlled company, because more than a majority of its voting power is controlled by VBC Energia S.A./Camargo Correa S.A./ESC Energia S.A., PREVI/BB Carteira Livre I Fundo de Investimento em Ações and Energia São Paulo FIA/Bonaire Participações S.A. As a controlled company, CPFL would not be required to comply with the majority of independent directors requirements if it were a U.S. domestic issuer. CPFL has one independent director, as defined by BM&FBOVESPA rules.

303A.03

The non-management directors of a listed company must meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management.

The non-management directors of CPFL do not meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management.

303A.04

A listed company must have a Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee composed entirely of independent directors, with a written charter that covers certain minimum specified duties. “Controlled companies” are not required to comply with this requirement.

As a controlled company, CPFL would not be required to comply with the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee requirements if it were a U.S. domestic issuer. Nonetheless, in order to improve its corporate governance practices, CPFL constituted the ad hoc Corporate Governance Commission, composed of four members: the CEO and three members of the Board of Directors. This Commission is responsible for evaluating the effectiveness of CPFL’s corporate governance practices whenever necessary, proposing improvements to CPFL’s governance practices, and monitoring the implementation of CPFL’s corporate governance practices.

303A.05

A listed company must have a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors, with a written charter that covers certain minimum specified duties. “Controlled companies” are not required to comply with this requirement.

As a controlled company, CPFL would not be required to comply with the compensation committee requirements. The Human Resources Management Committee of CPFL is an advisory committee of the Board of Directors. It has three members who are all Directors, none of whom is independent. According to its charter, this committee is responsible for assisting the Board of Directors by: (i) coordinating the CEO selection process, (ii) defining criteria for compensation of the executive officers, including long and short-term incentive plans, (iii) defining performance goals of the executive officers, (iv) coordinating evaluation procedures of the executive officers, (v) preparation of the plan of succession for executive officers and (vi) monitoring the execution of human resources policies and practices and preparing improvement proposals when necessary.

 

121

 


 
 

Table of Contents

Section of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual

New York Stock Exchange Listing Standard

Ways that CPFL’s Corporate Governance Practices Differ from Those Followed by Domestic Companies Listed on the New York Stock Exchange

 

 

 

303A.06 and 303A.07

A listed company must have an audit committee with a minimum of three independent directors that satisfy the independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act, with a written charter that covers certain minimum specified duties.

In lieu of appointing an audit committee composed of independent members of the Board of Directors, CPFL has a permanent Conselho Fiscal, or fiscal council, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Brazilian Corporate Law, and CPFL has granted the fiscal council with additional powers that meet the requirements of Exchange Act Rule 10A-3(c)(3). Under Brazilian Corporate Law, which enumerates standards for the independence of the fiscal council from CPFL and its management, none of the members of the fiscal council may be: (i) members of the Board of Directors; (ii) members of the board of executive officers; (iii) employed by CPFL or an affiliate or company controlled by CPFL or (iv) a spouse or relative of any member of the company’s management or Board of Directors. Members of the fiscal council are elected at the company’s general shareholders meeting for a one-year term of office. The fiscal council of CPFL currently has five members, all of whom comply with standards (i) to (iv) above. The responsibilities of the fiscal council, which are set forth in its charter, includes reviewing management’s activities and the company’s financial statements, and reporting findings to the company’s shareholders.

303A.08

Shareholders must be given the opportunity to vote on all equity-compensation plans and material revisions thereto, with limited exemptions set forth in the NYSE rules.

Under Brazilian Corporate Law, shareholder pre-approval is required for the adoption of any equity compensation plans.

303A.09

A listed company must adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines that cover certain minimum specified subjects.

CPFL has formal corporate governance guidelines that address the matters specified in the NYSE rules. CPFL’s corporate governance guidelines are available on http://www.cpfl.com.br/ir.

303A.10

A listed company must adopt and disclose a code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees, and promptly disclose any waivers of the code for directors or executive officers.

CPFL has a formal Code of Ethics that applies to its directors, officers, employees and controlling shareholders. CPFL’s Code of Ethics has a scope that is similar, but not identical, to that required for a U.S. domestic company under the NYSE rules. CPFL reports each year under Item 16B of our annual report on Form 20-F any waivers of the code of ethics in favor of our chief executive officer, our chief financial officer, our principal accounting officer and persons performing similar functions. We will disclose such amendment or waiver on our website.

303A.12

Each listed company CEO must certify to the NYSE each year that he or she is not aware of any violation by the company of NYSE corporate governance listing standards.

CPFL’s CEO provides to the NYSE a Foreign Private Issuer Annual Written Affirmation, and he will promptly notify the NYSE in writing after any executive officer of CPFL becomes aware of any material non-compliance with any applicable provisions of the NYSE corporate governance rules.

 

ITEM 16H.                MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 17.                     Financial Statements

Not applicable.

ITEM 18.                     Financial Statements

See pages F-1 through F-89, incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 19.                     Exhibits 

No.

Description

1.1

Amended and Restated Bylaws of CPFL Energia S.A. (together with an English version).

3.1

Shareholders Agreement dated March 22, 2002 as amended on August 27, 2002, November 5, 2003 and December 6, 2007 among VBC Energia S.A., 521 Participações S.A., Bonaire Participações S.A. and CPFL Energia S.A.

8.1

List of subsidiaries, their jurisdiction of incorporation and names under which they do business.

12.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

12.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

13.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

13.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

15.1

Letter from KPMG Auditores Independentes to the SEC, dated April 9, 2013 regarding the change in independent public accounting firm.

 

122

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

The amount of long‑term debt securities of CPFL Energia or its subsidiaries authorized under any outstanding agreement does not exceed 10.0% of CPFL Energia’s total assets on a consolidated basis.  CPFL Energia hereby agrees to furnish the SEC, upon its request, a copy of any instruments defining the rights of holders of its long‑term debt or of its subsidiaries for which consolidated or unconsolidated financial statements are required to be filed.

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ABRADEE:  Brazilian Association of Electric Energy Distributors (Associação Brasileira de Distribuidores de Energia Elétrica).

Allowed Annual Revenue:  Revenue received by electricity Transmission companies annualy. Such revenue is calculated based on the estimated investment to build, maintain and operate a Transmission system.

ANEEL:  National Electric Energy Agency (Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica).

Annual Reference Value:  Mechanism which limits the amounts of costs that can be passed through to Final Consumers.  The Annual Reference Value corresponds to the weighted average of electricity acquisition costs resulting from electricity prices of all public auctions carried out by ANEEL and CCEE in the Regulated Market for electricity to be delivered five and three years from any such auction and only applies during the first three years following the commencement of delivery of the acquired electricity.

Assured Energy:  Amount of energy that generators are allowed to sell in long‑term contracts.

Basic Network:  Interconnected Transmission lines, dams, energy transformers and equipment with voltage equal to or higher than 230 kV, or installations with lower voltage as determined by ANEEL.

Capacity Agreement:  Agreement under which a generator commits to make a certain amount of capacity available to the Regulated Market.  In such case, the generator’s revenue is guaranteed and the distributors must bear the risk of a supply shortage.

CCEAR:  Regulated Market (Contratos de Comercialização de Energia no Ambiente Regulado).

CCEE:  Energy Trading Chamber (Câmara de Comercialização de Energia Elétrica).  The short‑term electricity market, established in 1998 through the Power Industry Law, which replaced the prior system of regulated generation prices and supply contracts, formerly known as the Wholesale Energy Market.

CNPE:  National Energy Policy Council (Conselho Nacional de Política Energética).

Distribution Network:  Electric network system that distributes energy to end consumers within a concession area.

Distributor:  An entity supplying electric energy to a group of consumers by means of a Distribution Network.

Energy Agreement:  Agreement under which a generator commits to supply a certain amount of electricity and assumes the risk that its electricity supply could be adversely affected by hydrological conditions and low reservoir levels, which could interrupt the supply of electricity.  In such a case, the generator would be required to purchase electricity elsewhere in order to comply with its supply commitments.

123

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Final Consumer:  A party that uses electricity for its own needs.

Free Consumers:  (i) Existing consumers with demand of at least 10 MW and supplied at voltage level equal to or greater than 69 kV; (ii) new consumers with demand of at least 3 MW at any voltage; (iii) groups of consumers subject to agreement with the local distribution concessionaire; (iv) consumers who do not receive supply for more than 180 days from a local distribution concessionaire; and (v) certain others.

Free Market:  Market segment that permits a certain degree of competition.  The Free Market specifically contemplates purchase of electricity by non‑regulated entities such as Free Consumers and energy traders.

Gigawatt (GW):  One billion watts.

Gigawatt hour  (GWh):  One gigawatt of power supplied or demanded for one hour, or one billion watt hours.

High voltage:  A class of nominal system voltages equal to or greater than 69,000 volts (69 kV) and equal to or lower  than 230,000 volts (230 kVs).

Hydroelectric Power Plant or Hydroelectric Facility:  A generator that uses water power to drive the electric generator.

Installed Capacity:  The level of electricity which can be delivered from a particular generator on a full-load continuous basis under specified conditions as designated by the manufacturer.

Interconnected Power System:  Systems or networks for the Transmission of energy, connected together by means of one or more links (lines and/or transformers).

Independent Power Producer:  A legal entity or consortium holding a concession or authorization for power generation for sale for its own account to public utility concessionaires.

IPCA: Broad consumer price index (Indice Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo, calculated and published by Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE).

Kilovolt (kV):  One thousand volts.

Kilowatt (kW):  One thousand watts.

Kilowatt hour  (kWh):  One kilowatt of power supplied or demanded for one hour, or one thousand watt hours.

Low Voltage: A class of nominal system voltages equal to or lower  than 1,000 volts (1 kV).

MCPSE: Electricity Sector Asset Control Manual (Manual de Controle Patrimonial do Setor Elétrico).

Medium Voltage: A class of nominal system voltages greater than 1,000 volts (1 kV) and lower  than 69,000 volts (69 kVs).

Megawatt (MW):  One million watts.

Megawatt hour  (MWh):  One megawatt of power supplied or demanded for one hour, or one million watt hours.

Micro Hydroelectric Power Plants:  Power projects with capacity lower than 1 MW.

MME:  Ministry of Mines and Energy (Ministério de Minas e Energia). 

Megawatt-peak (MWp): The measure of the nominal power of a photovoltaic solar device under laboratory lighting conditions.

124

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

MRE:  Energy Reallocation Mechanism (Mecanismo de Realocação de Energia). 

MVA: Mega Volt Ampère.

ONS:  National System Operator (Operador Nacional do Sistema), an entity responsible for operational planning, administration of generation and Transmission and planning of Transmission investments in the power industry.

Parcel A Costs:  Costs that include, among others, the following:  (i) costs of electricity purchased for resale pursuant to Initial Supply Contracts; (ii) costs of electricity purchased from Itaipu; (iii) costs of electricity purchased pursuant to bilateral agreements that are freely negotiated between parties; and (iv) certain other charges for the Transmission and distribution systems.

Parcel B Costs:  Costs that are under control of distributors.  Such costs are determined by subtracting all of the Parcel A costs from the distribution company’s revenues, excluding ICMS and PIS/COFINS, a state and federal tax levied on sales.  Parcel B costs include, among others, the return on investment related to concessions and their expansion, as well as maintenance and operational costs.

Rationing Program:  The Brazilian government program to reduce electricity consumption that was in effect from June 1, 2001 to February 28, 2002 as a result of poor hydrological conditions that threatened the country’s electricity supply.

Regulated Market:  Market segment in which distribution companies purchase all the electricity needed to supply customers through public auctions.  The auction process is administered by ANEEL, either directly or through CCEE, under certain guidelines provided by the MME.  The Regulated Market is generally considered to be more stable in terms of supply of electricity.

Retail Distribution Tariff:  Revenue charged by distribution companies to its customers.  Each customer falls within a certain tariff level defined by law and based on the customer’s classification, although some flexibility is available according to the nature of each customer’s demand.  Retails tariffs are subject to annual readjustments by ANEEL.

RTE:  Extraordinary Tariff Adjustment (reajuste tarifário extraordinário). 

Small Hydroelectric Power Plants:  Power projects with capacity from 1 MW to 30 MW.

Special consumer:  A group of consumers that uses at least 500 kV.  Special Consumers may only purchase energy from (i) Small Hydroelectric Power Plants with capacity between 1,000 kW and 30,000 kW, (ii) generators with capacity limited to 1,000 kW, and (iii) alternative energy generators (solar, wind and biomass enterprises) with capacity injected in the system not greater than 30,000 kW.  A Special Consumer may terminate its contract with the local distributor with 180 days prior notice for contracts with indefinite terms.

Substation:  An assemblage of equipment which switches and/or changes or regulates the voltage of electricity in a Transmission and distribution system.

Thermoelectric Power Plant:  A generator which uses combustible fuel, such as coal, oil, diesel natural gas or other hydrocarbon as the source of energy to drive the electric generator.

Transmission:  The bulk transfer of electricity from generating facilities to the distribution system at load center station by means of the Transmission network (in lines with capacity between 69 kV and 525 kV).

Transmission Tariff:  Revenue charged by a Transmission concessionaire based on the Transmission network it owns and operates.  Transmission tariffs are subject to periodic revisions by ANEEL.

Volt:  The basic unit of electric force analogous to water pressure in pounds per square inch.

Watt:  The basic unit of electrical power.

 

125

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant, CPFL Energia S.A., hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the city of Campinas, state of São Paulo, Brazil, on April 17, 2013.

                CPFL ENERGIA S.A.

By:         /s/ Wilson Ferreira Junior                      

Name:    Wilson Ferreira Junior

Title:       Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)

 

 

By:         /s/ Gustavo Estrella                               

Name:    Gustavo Estrella

Title:       Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)

 

 

126

 


 

 

Table of Contents



Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Av. Dr. José Bonifácio Coutinho
Nogueira, 150 - 5º andar
Campinas - SP - 13091-611
Brasil

Tel: + 55 (19) 3707-3000
Fax:+ 55 (19) 3707-3001
www.deloitte.com.br 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
CPFL Energia S.A.
São Paulo - SP

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of CPFL Energia S.A. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CPFL Energia S.A. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2012, in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards - IFRS, issued by the International Accounting Standards Board - IASB.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated April 9, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes

Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
April 9, 2013

 

“Deloitte” refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee, and its network of member firms, each of which is a legally separate and independent entity. Please see www.deloitte.com/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited and its Member Firms.

© Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. All rights reserved.


 

Table of Contents


KPMG Auditores Independentes  Central Tel  55 (19) 2129-8700 
Av. Barão de Itapura, 950 - 6º  Fax  55 (19) 2129-8728 
13020-431 - Campinas, SP - Brasil  Internet  www.kpmg.com.br 
Caixa Postal 737     
13012-970 - Campinas, SP - Brasil     

 

Report of independent registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
CPFL Energia S.A.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of CPFL Energia S.A. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholdersequity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2011. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the CPFL Energia S.A. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).

 

 

/s/ KPMG Auditores Independentes
São Paulo, Brazil
April 9, 2013.

 

 

KPMG Auditores Independentes, uma sociedade simples brasileira  KPMG Auditores Independentes, a Brazilian entity and a member firm 
e firma-membro da rede KPMG de firmas-membro independentes e  of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with 
afiliadas à KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”),  KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss 
uma entidade suíça.  entity. 

 


 
 

Table of Contents

 

CPFL ENERGIA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011 (In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$)

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

Dec 31, 2012

 

Dec 31, 2011 (¹)

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT ASSETS

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents (note 5)

 

2,477,894

 

2,699,837

Consumers, concessionaires and licensees (note 6)

 

2,268,601

 

1,874,280

Financial investments

 

6,100

 

47,521

Recoverable taxes (note 7)

 

263,403

 

277,463

Derivatives (note 33)

 

870

 

3,733

Materials and supplies

 

49,346

 

44,872

Leases (note 9)

 

9,740

 

4,581

Financial asset of concession (note 10)

 

34,444

 

-

Other credits (note 11)

 

519,797

 

410,768

 TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS

 

5,630,196

 

5,363,054

 

 

 

 

 

NONCURRENT ASSETS

 

 

 

 

Consumers, concessionaires and licensees (note 6)

 

162,017

 

182,300

Escrow deposits (note 20)

 

1,184,554

 

1,128,616

Financial investments

 

-

 

109,965

Recoverable taxes (note 7)

 

225,036

 

216,715

Derivatives (note 33)

 

486,438

 

215,642

Deferred taxes credits (note 8)

 

1,318,618

 

1,176,535

Leases (note 9)

 

31,703

 

24,521

Financial asset of concession (note 10)

 

2,342,796

 

1,376,664

Prepaid post-employment benefit obligation (note 17)

 

10,203

 

3,416

Investment at cost

 

116,654

 

116,654

Other credits (note 11)

 

420,155

 

279,460

Property, plant and equipment (note 12)

 

9,611,958

 

8,292,076

Intangible assets (note 13)

 

9,535,360

 

8,927,439

TOTAL NONCURRENT ASSETS

 

25,445,491

 

22,050,004

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

 

31,075,687

 

27,413,057

 

 

 

 

 

(¹) Includes the effects described in note 2.8

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.                                      

 

 

F - 1


 
 

Table of Contents

 

CPFL ENERGIA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011 (In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$)

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

Dec 31,2012

 

Dec 31,2011 (¹)

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

Suppliers (note 14)

 

1,691,002

 

1,240,143

Accrued interest on loans and financing (note 15)

 

142,599

 

141,902

Accrued interest on debentures (note 16)

 

95,614

 

83,552

Loans and financing (note 15)

 

1,558,499

 

896,414

Debentures (note 16)

 

336,459

 

531,185

Post-employment benefit obligation (note 17)

 

51,675

 

40,695

Regulatory charges (note 18)

 

114,488

 

145,146

Taxes and social contributions payable (note 19)

 

442,365

 

483,028

Dividends and interest on equity

 

26,542

 

24,524

Accrued liabilities

 

72,535

 

70,771

Derivatives (note 33)

 

109

 

-

Public utilities (note 21)

 

30,422

 

28,738

Other accounts payable (note 22)

 

631,043

 

813,338

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES

 

5,193,350

 

4,499,437

 

 

 

 

 

NONCURRENT LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

Suppliers (note 14)

 

4,467

 

-

Accrued interest on loans and financing (note 15)

 

62,271

 

23,627

Loans and Financing (note 15)

 

9,035,534

 

7,382,455

Debentures (note 16)

 

5,895,143

 

4,548.651

Post-employment benefit obligation (note 17)

 

325,455

 

414,629

Taxes and social contributions payable (note 19)

 

-

 

165

Deferred taxes debits (note 8)

 

1,155,733

 

1,038,101

Provision for tax, civil and labor risks (note 20)

 

386,079

 

338,121

Derivatives (note 33)

 

336

 

24

Public utilities (note 21)

 

461,157

 

440,926

Other accounts payable (note 22)

 

149,099

 

174,410

 TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES

 

17,475,275

 

14,361,110

 

 

 

 

 

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (note 23)

 

 

 

 

Capital

 

4,793,424

 

4,793,424

Capital reserves

 

228,322

 

229,956

Legal reserves

 

556,481

 

495,185

Earnings retained for investment

 

326,899

 

-

Additional dividend proposed

 

455,906

 

758,470

Other comprehensive income

 

535,627

 

563,005

Retained earnings

 

-

 

227,118

 

 

6,896,660

 

7,067,158

Net equity attributable to noncontrolling shareholders

 

1,510,401

 

1,485,352

TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

8,407,061

 

8,552,511

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

31,075,687

 

27,413,057

(¹) Includes the effects described in note 2.8

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

F - 2


 
 

Table of Contents

 

CPFL ENERGIA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010
(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, except for earnings per share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012

 

2011 (¹)

 

2010 (¹)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET OPERATING REVENUE (note 25)

 

15,055,147

 

12,764,028

 

12,023,729

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COST OF ELECTRIC ENERGY SERVICES

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of electric energy (note 26)

 

(7,725,980)

 

(6,220,970)

 

(6,222,490)

Operating cost (note 27)

 

(1,620,312)

 

(1,157,970)

 

(1,067,493)

Services rendered to third parties (note 27)

 

(1,355,675)

 

(1,138,626)

 

(1,050,980)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GROSS OPERATING INCOME

 

4,353,181

 

4,246,463

 

3,682,766

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses (note 27)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales expenses

 

(468,345)

 

(364,352)

 

(300,435)

General and administrative expenses

 

(732,823)

 

(615,171)

 

(443,212)

Other operating expense

 

(380,899)

 

(216,392)

 

(199,804)

 

 

(1,582,067)

 

(1,195,916)

 

(943,451)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME FROM ELECTRIC ENERGY SERVICE

 

2,771,113

 

3,050,547

 

2,739,315

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FINANCIAL INCOME (EXPENSE) (note 28)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income

 

720,332

 

761,400

 

565,751

Expense

 

(1,487,964)

 

(1,386,778)

 

(837,058)

 

 

(767,632)

 

(625,378)

 

(271,307)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME BEFORE TAXES

 

2,003,481

 

2,425,169

 

2,468,008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Social contribution (note 8)

 

(198,987)

 

(215,517)

 

(228,672)

Income tax (note 8)

 

(547,760)

 

(585,380)

 

(624,759)

 

 

(746,747)

 

(800,896)

 

(853,431)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME

 

1,256,734

 

1,624,273

 

1,614,577

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to controlling shareholders

 

1,225,924

 

1,572,292

 

1,595,151

Net income attributable to noncontrolling shareholders

 

30,810

 

51,981

 

19,426

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share attributable to controlling shareholders:

Basic (note 24)

1.27

 

1.63

 

1.66

Diluted (note 24)

 

1.26

 

1.63

 

1.66

             

(¹) Includes the effects described in note 2.8

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

F - 3


 
 

Table of Contents

CPFL ENERGIA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEARS ENDED IN DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010

 (In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$)

 

 

 

2012

 

2011 (¹)

 

2010 (¹)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME

 

1,256,734

 

1,624,273

 

1,614,577

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive income for the year

 

1,256,734

 

1,624,273

 

1,614,577

Comprehensive income attributable to controlling shareholders

 

1,225,924

 

1,572,292

 

1,595,151

Comprehensive income attributable to non controlling shareholders

 

30,810

 

51,981

 

19,426

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(¹) Includes the effects described in note 2.8

 

 

F - 4


 
 

Table of Contents

 

CPFL ENERGIA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011, 2010

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$)

 

 

                                             
           

Profit reserves

                 

Noncontrolling shareholders´ interest

   
               

Earnings

 

Additional

 

Other

         

Other

     

Total

       

Capital

 

Legal

 

retained for

 

dividend

 

comprehensive

 

Retained earnings

 

Total

 

comprehensive

 

Other

 

Shareholders'

   

Capital

 

reserves

 

reserve

 

investment

 

proposed

 

income

 

 

   

income

 

equity

 

equity

Balance at December 31, 2009 (¹)

 

4,741,175

 

16

 

341,751

 

-

 

655,017

 

635,871

 

(104,482)

 

6,269,348

 

-

 

267,431

 

6,536,779

                                             

Total comprehensive income

                                           

Net income for the period

 

-  

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,595,151

 

1,595,151

 

-

 

19,426

 

1,614,577

   

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,595,151

 

1,595,151

 

-

 

19,426

 

1,614,577

Internal changes of shareholders'equity

                                           

- Realization of deemed cost of fixed assets

 

-  

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(39,605)

 

39,605

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

- Tax on deemed cost realization

 

-  

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

13,466

 

(13,466)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

- Formation of statutory reserve

 

-

 

-

 

76,914

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(76,914)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

- Other changes in noncontrolling shareholders

 

-  

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(13,761)

 

(13,761)

   

-

 

-

 

76,914

 

-

 

-

 

(26,139)

 

(50,775)

 

-

 

-

 

(13,761)

 

(13,761)

Capital transactions with the shareholders

                                           

- Prescribed dividend

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

6,406

 

6,406

 

-

     

6,406

- Interim dividend

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(774,429)

 

(774,429)

 

-

 

(6,181)

 

(780,610)

- Dividend proposed

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

486,040

 

-

 

(486,040)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

- Additional dividend aproved

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(655,017)

 

-

 

-

 

(655,017)

 

-

 

(10,967)

 

(665,984)

- Capital Increase

 

52,249

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

52,249

 

-

     

52,249

   

52,249

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(168,977)

 

-

 

(1,254,063)

 

(1,370,791)

 

-

 

(17,148)

 

(1,387,939)

                                             

Balance at December 31, 2010 (¹)

 

4,793,424

 

16

 

418,665

 

-

 

486,040

 

609,732

 

185,831

 

6,493,708

 

-

 

255,948

 

6,749,656

                                             

Total comprehensive income

                                           

Net income for the period

 

-  

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,572,292

 

1,572,292

 

-

 

51,981

 

1,624,273

   

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,572,292

 

1,572,292

 

-

 

51,981

 

1,624,273

Internal changes of shareholders'equity

                                           

- Realization of deemed cost of fixed assets

 

-  

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(39,098)

 

39,098

 

-

 

(368)

 

368

 

-

- Tax on deemed cost realization

 

-  

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

13,293

 

(13,293)

 

-

 

125

 

(125)

 

-

- Formation of statutory reserve

 

-

 

-

 

76,520

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(76,520)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

- Other changes in noncontrolling shareholders

 

-  

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(14)

 

(14)

   

-

 

-

 

76,520

 

-

 

-

 

(25,805)

 

(50,715)

 

-

 

(243)

 

229

 

(14)

Capital transactions with the shareholders

                                           

- Prescribed dividend

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

4,967

 

4,967

 

-

 

-

 

4,967

- Interim dividend

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(747,709)

 

(747,709)

 

-

 

(3,498)

 

(751,207)

- Dividend proposed

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

758,470

 

-

 

(758,470)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

- Additional dividend aproved

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(486,040)

 

-

 

-

 

(486,040)

 

-

 

(3,596)

 

(489,636)

- Business Combination - CPFL Renováveis

 

-

 

229,940

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(20,922)

 

20,922

 

229,940

 

20,922

 

1,163,609

 

1,414,473

   

-

 

229,940

 

-

 

-

 

272,430

 

(20,922)

 

(1,480,290)

 

(998,843)

 

20,922

 

1,156,515

 

178,596

                                             

Balance at December 31, 2011 (¹)

 

4,793,424

 

229,956

 

495,185

 

-

 

758,470

 

563,005

 

227,118

 

7,067,158

 

20,679

 

1,464,673

 

8,552,511

                                             

Total comprehensive income

                                           

Net income for the period

 

-  

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,225,924

 

1,225,924

 

-

 

30,810

 

1,256,734

   

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,225,924

 

1,225,924

 

-

 

30,810

 

1,256,734

Internal changes of shareholders'equity

                                           

- Reserve of retained earnings for investment

 

-  

 

-

 

-

 

326,899

 

-

 

-

 

(326,899)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

- Realization of deemed cost of fixed assets

 

-  

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(41,482)

 

41,482

 

-

 

(1,421)

 

1,421

 

-

- Tax on deemed cost realization

 

-  

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

14,104

 

(14,104)

 

-

 

483

 

(483)

 

-

- Formation of statutory reserve

 

-

 

-

 

61,296

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(61,296)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

- Other changes in noncontrolling shareholders

 

-  

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(334)

 

(334)

   

-

 

-

 

61,296

 

326,899

 

-

 

(27,378)

 

(360,818)

 

-

 

(938)

 

604

 

(334)

Capital transactions with the shareholders

                                           

- Prescribed dividend

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

3,921

 

3,921

 

-

 

-

 

3,921

- Interim dividend

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(640,239)

 

(640,239)

 

-

 

-

 

(640,239)

- Dividend proposed

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

455,906

 

-

 

(455,906)

 

-

 

-

 

(5,875)

 

(5,875)

- Additional dividend aproved

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(758,470)

 

-

 

-

 

(758,470)

 

-

 

(8,201)

 

(766,672)

- Payment of capital by non-controlling shareholders in subsidiaries

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

3,563

 

3,563

- Additional dividend aproved

 

-

 

(1,634)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(1,634)

 

-

 

5,086

 

3,452

   

-

 

(1,634)

 

-

 

-

 

(302,564)

 

-

 

(1,092,224)

 

(1,396,422)

 

-

 

(5,427)

 

(1,401,849)

                                             

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

4,793,424

 

228,322

 

556,481

 

326,899

 

455,906

 

535,627

 

-

 

6,896,660

 

19,741

 

1,490,660

 

8,407,061

 

(¹) Includes the effects described in note 2.8

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

 

 

 

F - 5


 
 

Table of Contents

 

CPFL ENERGIA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$)

 

 

 

2012

 

 

2011 (¹)

 

 

2010 (¹)

OPERATING CASH FLOW

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income for the year, before income tax and social contribution

 

2,003,481

 

2,425,169

 

2,468,008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ADJUSTMENT TO RECONCILE INCOME TO CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

1,127,103

 

801,203

 

691,793

Provision for tax, civil, labor and environmental risks

 

95,226

 

35,219

 

(29,598)

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

163,903

 

-

 

-

Interest and monetary adjustment

 

1,099,913

 

1,105,405

 

531,310

Post-employment benefit income

 

(16,340)

 

(82,953)

 

(80,629)

Losses on the write-off of noncurrent assets

 

54,579

 

3,688

 

1,142

Deferred taxes (PIS and COFINS)

 

(64,005)

 

6,429

 

2,153

Other

 

21,919

 

-

 

536

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DECREASE (INCREASE) IN OPERATING ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumers, concessionaires and licensees

 

(486,380)

 

(9,184)

 

(34,085)

Recoverable taxes

 

48,558

 

(12,971)

 

3,146

Lease

 

(3,969)

 

(6,347)

 

(2,945)

Escrow deposits

 

(55,779)

 

(164,165)

 

(52,109)

Other operating assets

 

(73,495)

 

(61,086)

 

(78,202)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN OPERATING LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

Suppliers

 

435,014

 

122,783

 

(16,714)

Other taxes and social contributions

 

(146,600)

 

54,230

 

(88,996)

Other liabilities with employee pension plans

 

(79,450)

 

(70,318)

 

(72,235)

Regulatory charges

 

(29,057)

 

21,596

 

59,792

Other operating liabilities

 

(68,314)

 

65,832

 

5,382

CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY OPERATIONS

 

4,026,307

 

4,234,530

 

3,307,749

Interests paid

 

(1,018,078)

 

(981,682)

 

(573,170)

Income tax and social contribution paid

 

(864,145)

 

(764,195)

 

(705,366)

NET CASH FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

2,144,084

 

2,488,653

 

2,029,213

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of subsidiaries net of cash acquired

 

(706,186)

 

(814,330)

 

-

Payment of acquisition payables

 

(172,476)

 

(48,608)

 

(5,752)

Increase cash for business combination

 

-

 

253,178

 

-

Increase in property, plant and equipment

 

(1,034,589)

 

(829,701)

 

(634,931)

Financial investments, pledges, funds and tied deposits

 

(14,806)

 

18,688

 

17,777

Lease

 

(6,581)

 

8,314

 

(3,931)

Additions to intangible assets

 

(1,433,064)

 

(1,075,072)

 

(1,165,609)

Sale of noncurrent assets

 

-

 

-

 

828

Other

 

(558)

 

-

 

(10,269)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET CASH FLOW USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

(3,368,260)

 

(2,487,531)

 

(1,801,887)

 

 

F - 6


 
 

Table of Contents

 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans, financing and debentures obtained

 

4,294,254

 

5,536,932

 

2,571,002

Increment of cash due to increase of interest in subsidiary

 

-

 

1,118

 

-

Payments of loans, financing and debentures, net of derivatives

 

(1,885,175)

 

(3,157,839)

 

(1,280,290)

Payments of dividend and interest on shareholders’ equity

 

(1,406,846)

 

(1,240,590)

 

(1,440,094)

Other

 

-

 

(3,802)

 

(2,292)

 

NET CASH FLOW PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

1,002,233

 

1,135,819

 

(151,674)

 

(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

(221,943)

 

1,136,941

 

75,652

 

OPENING BALANCE OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

2,699,837

 

1,562,897

 

1,487,245

 

CLOSING BALANCE OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

2,477,894

 

2,699,837

 

1,562,897

 

(¹) Includes the effects described in note 2.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

 

 

F - 7


 
 

Table of Contents

CPFL ENERGIA S.A.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED ON DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010

(Amounts stated in thousands of Brazilian reais, except where otherwise indicated)

 

 

( 1 )  OPERATIONS  

 

CPFL Energia S.A. (“CPFL Energia” or “Company”) is a publicly quoted corporation incorporated for the principal purpose of acting as a holding company, participating in the capital of other companies primarily dedicated to electric energy distribution, generation and sales activities in Brazil.

The Company’s headquarters are located at Rua Gomes de Carvalho, 1510 - 14º floor- Room 142 - Vila Olímpia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.

The Company has direct and indirect interests in the following operational subsidiaries (unaudited information on the concession area, number of consumers, energy production capacity and associated data):

Energy distribution

 

Company Type

 

Equity Interest

 

Consolidation criteria

 

Location (State)

 

Number of municipalities

 

Approximate number of consumers (in thousands)

 

Concession term

 

End of the concession

                                 

Companhia Paulista de Força e Luz ("CPFL Paulista")

 

Publicly-quoted corporation

 

Direct
100%

 

Full

 

Interior of São Paulo

 

234

 

3,891

 

30 years

 

November 2027

Companhia Piratininga de Força e Luz ("CPFL Piratininga")

 

Publicly-quoted corporation

 

Direct
100%

 

Full

 

Interior of São Paulo

 

27

 

1,531

 

30 years

 

October 2028

Rio Grande Energia S.A. ("RGE")

 

Publicly-quoted corporation

 

Direct
100%

 

Full

 

Interior of Rio Grande do Sul

 

253

 

1,354

 

30 years

 

November 2027

Companhia Luz e Força Santa Cruz ("CPFL Santa Cruz")

 

Private corporation

 

Direct
100%

 

Full

 

Interior of São Paulo and Paraná

 

27

 

191

 

16 years

 

July 2015

Companhia Leste Paulista de Energia ("CPFL Leste Paulista")

 

Private corporation

 

Direct
100%

 

Full

 

Interior of São Paulo

 

7

 

53

 

16 years

 

July 2015

Companhia Jaguari de Energia ("CPFL Jaguari")

 

Private corporation

 

Direct
100%

 

Full

 

Interior of São Paulo

 

2

 

35

 

16 years

 

July 2015

Companhia Sul Paulista de Energia ("CPFL Sul Paulista")

 

Private corporation

 

Direct
100%

 

Full

 

Interior of São Paulo

 

5

 

77

 

16 years

 

July 2015

Companhia Luz e Força de Mococa ("CPFL Mococa")

 

Private corporation

 

Direct
100%

 

Full

 

Interior of São Paulo and Minas Gerais

 

4

 

43

 

16 years

 

July 2015

 

 

                       

Installed power

Energy generation
(conventional and renewable sources)

 

Company Type

 

Equity Interest

 

Consolidation criteria

 

Location (State)

 

Number of plants / type of energy

 

Total

 

CPFL participation

                             

CPFL Geração de Energia S.A.
("CPFL Geração")

 

Publicly-quoted corporation

 

Direct
100%

 

Full

 

São Paulo, Goiás and Minas Gerais

 

1 Hydroelectric, 2 SHPs (*) e 1 Thermal

 

695 MW

 

695 MW

Foz do Chapecó Energia S.A.
("Foz do Chapecó")

 

Private corporation

 

Indirect
51%

 

Proportional

 

Santa Catarina and
Rio Grande do Sul

 

1 Hydroelectric

 

855 MW

 

436 MW

Campos Novos Energia S.A.
("ENERCAN")

 

Private corporation

 

Indirect
48,72%

 

Proportional

 

Santa Catarina

 

1 Hydroelectric

 

880 MW

 

429 MW

CERAN - Companhia Energética Rio das Antas
("CERAN")

 

Private corporation

 

Indirect
65%

 

Full

 

Rio Grande do Sul

 

3 Hydroelectric

 

360 MW

 

234 MW

BAESA - Energética Barra Grande S.A.
("BAESA")

 

Publicly-quoted corporation

 

Indirect
25,01%

 

Proportional

 

Santa Catarina and
Rio Grande do Sul

 

1 Hydroelectric

 

690 MW

 

173 MW

Centrais Elétricas da Paraíba S.A. ("EPASA")

 

Private corporation

 

Indirect
52.75%

 

Proportional

 

Paraíba

 

2 Thermals

 

342 MW

 

180 MW

Paulista Lajeado Energia S.A.
("Paulista Lajeado")

 

Private corporation

 

Indirect
59,93% (**)

 

Full

 

Tocantins

 

1 Hydroelectric

 

903 MW

 

63 MW

CPFL Renováveis Energias S.A.
("CPFL Renováveis")

 

Publicly-quoted corporation

 

Indirect
63%

 

Full

 

(***)

 

(***)

 

(***)

 

(***)

 

 

Commercialization of energy

 

Company Type

 

Core activity

 

Equity Interest

 

Consolidation criteria

CPFL Comercialização Brasil S.A. ("CPFL Brasil")

 

Private corporation

 

Energy commercialization, consultancy and advisory services to agents in the energy sector

 

Direct
100%

 

Full

Clion Assessoria e Comercialização de Energia Elétrica Ltda.
("CPFL Meridional")

 

Limited company

 

Commercialization and provision of energy services

 

Indirect
100%

 

Full

CPFL Comercialização Cone Sul S.A. ("CPFL Cone Sul")

 

Private corporation

 

Energy commercialization

 

Indirect
100%

 

Full

CPFL Planalto Ltda. ("CPFL Planalto")

 

Limited company

 

Energy commercialization

 

Direct
100%

 

Full

 

 

F - 8


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

Services

 

Company Type

 

Core activity

 

Equity Interest

 

Consolidation criteria

CPFL Serviços, Equipamentos, Industria e Comércio S.A.
("CPFL Serviços")

 

Private corporation

 

Manufacturing, commercialization, rental and maintenance of electro-mechanical equipment and service provision

 

Direct
100%

 

Full

NECT Serviços Administrativos Ltda ("Nect") (a)

 

Limited company

 

Provision of administrative services

 

Direct
100%

 

Full

CPFL Atende Centro de Contatos e Atendimento Ltda. ("CPFL Atende")

 

Limited company

 

Provision of telephone answering services

 

Direct
100%

 

Full

CPFL Total Serviços Administrativos Ltda. ("CPFL Total") (b)

 

Limited company

 

Billing and collection services

 

Direct and indirect
100%

 

Full

CPFL Telecom S.A ("CPFL Telecom") (c)

 

Private corporation

 

Telecommunication services

 

Direct
100%

 

Full

CPFL Transmissão Piracicaba S.A. (****)

 

Private corporation

 

Telecommunication services

 

Direct
100%

 

Full

(a) Former Chumpitaz Serviços S.A.

               

(b) Former CPFL Bio Anicuns S.A.

               

(c) Former CPFL Bio Itapaci S.A.

               
                 

Other

 

Company Type

 

Core activity

 

Equity Interest

 

Consolidation criteria

CPFL Jaguariuna Participações Ltda. ("CPFL Jaguariuna")

 

Limited company

 

Venture capital company

 

Direct
100%

 

Full

CPFL Jaguari de Geração de Energia Ltda. ("Jaguari Geração")

 

Limited company

 

Venture capital company

 

Direct
100%

 

Full

Chapecoense Geração S.A. ("Chapecoense")

 

Private corporation

 

Venture capital company

 

Indirect
51%

 

Proportional

Sul Geradora Participações S.A. ("Sul Geradora")

 

Private corporation

 

Venture capital company

 

Indirect
99.95%

 

Full

 

 (*)   SHP – Small Hydropower Plant

 

(**)   Paulista Lajeado has a 7% participation in the installed power of Investco S.A.(5.93% share of its capital).

 

(***) CPFL Renováveis has operations in São Paulo, Minas Gerais, Mato Grosso, Santa Catarina, Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraná and Rio Grande do Sul states and its main activities are: (i) holding investments in renewable generation sources; (ii) identification, development, and exploitation of generation potential sources; and (iii) commercialization of electric energy. At December 31, 2012, CPFL Renováveis had a project portfolio of 1,735 MW of installed capacity (1,093 MW proportional to the Company's share), as follows:

 

·       Hydropower generation: 35 SHP’s operational (326 MW);

·       Wind power generation: 15 projects operational (556 MW) e 18 projects under construction (482 MW);

·       Biomass power generation: 6 plants operations (270 MW) e 2 under construction (100 MW). 

·       Solar energy generation: 1 solar plant operational (1,1 MW)

 

(****)   CPFL Transmissão Piracicaba

          In December 2012 the subsidiary CPFL Geração was the successful bidder in ANEEL Transmission Auction 007/2012 which provides for the construction and operation of a transmission line approximately 6.5 km long as well as a 440 KV substation located in the municipality of Piracicaba, State of São Paulo. This line will be connected to the grid of one of the CPFL Energia group distributors and the works will be carried out by the subsidiary CPFL Serviços, making the business feasible. CPFL Geração set up CPFL Transmissão Piracicaba S.A (“CPFL Transmissão”), exclusively to operate this concession.

 

( 2 )  PRESENTATION OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

2.1 Basis of presentation:

The financial statements are presented in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards – IFRS, issued by the International Accounting Standard Board – IASB.

The financial statements were authorized for issue by the Board of Directors on April 9, 2013.

 

F - 9


 
 

Table of Contents

 

2.2 Basis of measurement:

The financial statements have been prepared on the historic cost basis except for the following material items recorded in the balance sheets: i) derivative financial instruments measured at fair value, ii) financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss, iii) available-for-sale financial assets measured at fair value, and iv) actuarial assets measured at fair value, for which the recognition is limited to the present value of future economic benefits available in the form of reimbursements or future reductions in contributions to the plan.

 

2.3 Use of estimates and judgments:

The preparation of the financial statements requires Company Management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses.

By definition, the resulting accounting estimates are rarely the same as the actual results. Accordingly, Company Management reviews the estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis, based on previous experience and other relevant factors. Adjustments resulting from reviews to accounting estimates are recorded in the period in which the estimates are reviewed and in any future periods affected

Information about assumptions and estimate that are subject to a greater degree of uncertainty and involve the risk of resulting in a material adjustment if these assumptions and estimates suffer significant changes in subsequent periods is included in the following accounts:

·         Note 6 – Consumers, concessionaires and licensees;

·         Note 8 – Deferred tax credits and debits;

·         Note 9 – Leases;

·         Note 10 – Financial asset of concession;

·         Note 11 – Other Credits (Allowance for doubtful accounts);

·         Note 12 – Property, plant and equipment and recognition of impairment losses;

·         Note 13 – Intangible assets and recognition of impairment losses;

·         Note 17 – Post-employment benefit obligation;

·         Note 20 – Provision for tax, civil and labor risks and escrow deposits;

·         Note 25 – Net operating revenues;

·         Note 26 – Cost of electric energy;

·         Note 33 – Financial instruments

 

2.4 Functional currency and presentation currency:

The Company’s functional currency is the Brazilian Real, and the financial statements are presented in thousands of reais.  Figures are rounded only after addition of the amounts.  Consequently, when added, the amounts shown in thousands of reais may not tally with the rounded totals.

 

2.5 Basis of consolidation:

(i) Business combinations

The Company measures goodwill as the fair value of the consideration transferred including the recorded amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree, less the recorded amount of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, all measured as of the acquisition date.

 

F - 10


 
 

Table of Contents

 

(ii) Subsidiaries and jointly-controlled entities:

The financial statements of subsidiaries and jointly-controlled entities (joint ventures) are included in the financial statements from the date that total or shared control commences until the date that control ceases.

A jointly controlled operation is a venture directly or indirectly controlled together with other investors, established by contractual agreement and requiring unanimous consent for strategic financial and operation decisions.

The accounting policies of subsidiaries and jointly-controlled entities taken into consideration in consolidation are aligned with the Company's accounting policies.

The financial statements include the balances and transactions of the Company and its subsidiaries. The balances and transactions of assets, liabilities, income and expenses have been fully consolidated for fully owned subsidiaries and proportionately consolidated for the jointly-controlled entities. Prior to consolidation in the Company's financial statements, the financial statements of the subsidiaries CPFL Geração, CPFL Brasil, CPFL Jaguari Geração and CPFL Renováveis are fully consolidated with those of their parent companies or proportionately consolidated for jointly-controlled entities.

Intra-group balances and transactions, and any income and expenses derived from these transactions, are eliminated in preparing the financial statements.  Unrealized gains arising from transactions with investees are eliminated against the investment to the extent of the Company’s interest in the investee. Unrealized losses are eliminated in the same way as unrealized gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.

In the case of subsidiaries, the portion relating to non-controlling shareholders is stated in shareholders' equity and after profit or loss and comprehensive income in each period presented. 

The balances of the jointly-controlled entities, and the Company's percentage participations, as of December 31, 2012, and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, are shown below:

 

   

Enercan

 

Baesa

 

Chapecoese Geração

 

Epasa

 

Total

   

48.72%

 

25.01%

 

51%

 

52.75%

 

2012

                   

Current assets

 

54,239

 

17,548

 

61,657

 

112,788

 

246,233

Non current assets

 

662,784

 

329,980

 

1,683,765

 

386,905

 

3,063,434

Current liabilities

 

48,780

 

32,150

 

121,419

 

142,802

 

382,398

Non current liabilities

 

255,957

 

166,630

 

1,234,819

 

259,895

 

1,917,301

Shareholders equity

 

412,286

 

148,749

 

389,183

 

96,996

 

1,009,967

                     

Gross operating revenues

 

218,840

 

77,736

 

346,003

 

212,700

 

855,279

Net operating revenues

 

203,718

 

70,545

 

319,310

 

191,114

 

784,688

Net income

 

68,492

 

(6,476)

 

46,501

 

13,457

 

121,974

                     

2011

                   

Current assets

 

52,131

 

19,718

 

35,861

 

23,140

 

130,850

Non current assets

 

685,795

 

362,484

 

1,737,137

 

405,175

 

3,190,591

Current liabilities

 

64,510

 

32,310

 

139,710

 

39,092

 

275,623

Non current liabilities

 

290,455

 

187,165

 

1,287,546

 

290,977

 

2,056,144

Shareholders equity

 

382,961

 

162,726

 

345,742

 

98,246

 

989,675

                     

Gross operating revenues

 

207,649

 

79,377

 

246,592

 

122,908

 

656,527

Net operating revenues

 

193,314

 

71,539

 

229,128

 

109,764

 

603,745

Net income

 

56,460

 

10,025

 

(3,376)

 

19,960

 

83,069

                     

2010

                   

Gross operating revenues

 

197,251

 

75,951

 

47,818

 

76,442

 

397,462

Net operating revenues

 

183,321

 

68,330

 

44,430

 

69,313

 

365,394

Net income

 

60,919

 

10,690

 

(8,059)

 

(27,187)

 

36,363

 

 

F - 11


 
 

Table of Contents

 

(iii) Acquisition of non-controlling interest

Accounted for as transactions within equity holders and therefore no goodwill is recognized as a result of such transactions.

 

2.6 Segment information:

An operating segment is a component of the Company (i) that engages in operating activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses, (ii) whose operating results are regularly reviewed by Management to make decisions about resources to be allocated and assess the segment's performance, and (iii) for which discrete financial information is available.

Company Management bases strategic decisions on reports, segmenting the business into: (i) electric energy distribution activities (“Distribution”); (ii) electric energy generation activities from conventional sources (“Generation”); (iii) electric energy generation activities from renewable sources (“Renewables”); (iv) energy commercialization (“Commercialization”); (v) service activities; and (vi) other activities not listed in the previous items.

Presentation of the operating segments includes items directly attributable to them, such as allocations required, including intangible assets

 

2.7 Information on corporate interests:

The interests directly or indirectly held by the Company in the subsidiaries and jointly-controlled entities are described in note 1. Except for the (i) jointly-controlled entities ENERCAN, BAESA, Chapecoense and EPASA which are consolidated proportionately, and (ii) the investment in Investco S.A. recorded at cost by the subsidiary Paulista Lajeado, the other subsidiaries are fully consolidated.

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the participation of non-controlling interests stated in the financial statements refers to the interests held by third-parties in the subsidiaries CERAN, Paulista Lajeado and CPFL Renováveis.

 

2.8 Adjustments and reclassifications in the 2011 and 2010 financial statements:

 

Certain amounts in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, originally issued on March 29, 2012 and on June 06, 2011, respectively, have been adjusted or reclassified, although they are not material, for purposes of comparison with the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012.  These amendments are due to a change in judgment concerning recognition in "other comprehensive income" of changes in the expectations of cash flows from the financial assets related to the concession, determined by IFRIC12 and designated in the available for sale category.


Even though the concession contract does not explicitly define whether the indemnity  will be based on the amount actually invested in the infrastructure or on the residual amount determined by the tariff pricing methodology, i.e. the Regulatory Remuneration Base (“BRR”), the Company and its subsidiaries, based on their best interpretation of the concession contract, expect to receive at the end of the concession, as indemnity for  investments made and not yet recovered, the equivalent of the amount calculated in accordance with the BRR. On first adoption of IFRS, the Company understood that changes in the fair values ​​of the assets that comprise the concession infrastructure would also constitute changes in the fair value of the financial asset to be received as indemnity at the end of the concession; such changes were therefore fully recognized in "other comprehensive income". It is noted that the procedure was adopted after analysis and discussions in a technical industry group, set up for the implementation of IFRS in Brazil, and the methodology described
previously in this paragraph was applied for a large number of participants in the technical group who adopted the BRR as the basis for calculating the amount of the indemnity.

F - 12


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

However, after review of the criteria used in accounting for this financial asset and the progress of industry discussions, the Company and its subsidiaries concluded that changes in the fair values ​​of infrastructure assets, and consequently in the indemnity, reflect changes in the estimated cash flow expectations and should therefore be recognized in the Statement of Income using the effective interest method in accordance with paragraph AG8 of IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.


Thus the change in accounting represents  an immaterial and unintentional error in interpretation of the accounting literature. In spite of the immaterial nature of the adjustment, the Company and its subsidiaries decided to adjust the comparative amounts for 2011 e 2010 in the presentation of the 2012 financial statements, in order to maintain the balances comparable.


Consequently, the Company and its subsidiaries are reclassifying and adjusting the financial statements as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, presented for purposes of comparison with the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012, in which the update of the financial assets related to the concession, resulting from changes in the expected cash flows from the financial assets related to the concession, is reclassified from "accumulated comprehensive income" to retained earnings, both in the shareholders’ equity,  and recognizing in Statement of Income for the years ended on December 31, 2011 and 2010 under “financial income”.

 

As mentioned above, since these effects are considered immaterial and do not change the total balances of assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company is not presenting the balance sheet for the beginning of the earliest period presented.

 

We present below a summary of the accounting adjustments and reclassification to assist understanding their effects on our financial statements:

 

      i.        Liabilities and Shareholders’ equity

 

 

   

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

   

Stated

 

Reclassification

 

Reclassified

 

Stated

 

Reclassification

 

Reclassified

                         

Current liabilities

 

4,499,437

 

-

 

4,499,437

 

4,428,323

 

-

 

4,428,323

Non current liabilities

 

14,361,110

 

-

 

14,361,110

 

8,878,819

 

-

 

8,878,819

Shareholders' equity

                       

Capital

 

4,793,424

 

-

 

4,793,424

 

4,793,424

 

-

 

4,793,424

Capital reserves

 

229,956

 

-

 

229,956

 

16

 

-

 

16

Legal reserves

 

495,185

 

-

 

495,185

 

418,665

 

-

 

418,665

Additional dividend proposed

 

758,470

 

-

 

758,470

 

486,040

 

-

 

486,040

Other comprehensive income

 

790,123

 

(227,118)

 

563,005

 

795,563

 

(185,831)

 

609,732

Retained earnings

 

-

 

227,118

 

227,118

 

-

 

185,831

 

185,831

   

7,067,157

 

-

 

7,067,157

 

6,493,708

 

-

 

6,493,708

Net equity attributable to noncontrolling shareholders

 

1,485,352

 

-

 

1,485,352

 

255,948

 

-

 

255,948

Total shareholders' equity

 

8,552,510

 

-

 

8,552,510

 

6,749,656

 

-

 

6,749,656

                         

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

 

27,413,058

 

-

 

27,413,058

 

20,056,797

 

-

 

20,056,797

 

 

     ii.        Statement of income

 

F - 13


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

   

2011

 

2010

   

Stated

 

Adjustment

 

Adjusted

 

Stated

 

Adjustment

 

Adjusted

Net operating revenue

 

12,764,028

 

-

 

12,764,028

 

12,023,729

 

-

 

12,023,729

Cost of eletric energy services

 

(8,517,566)

 

-

 

(8,517,566)

 

(8,340,963)

 

-

 

(8,340,963)

Gross operating income

 

4,246,463

 

-

 

4,246,463

 

3,682,766

 

-

 

3,682,766

                         

Income from electric energy service

 

3,050,547

 

-

 

3,050,547

 

2,739,315

 

-

 

2,739,315

                         

Financial income (expense)

 

(688,590)

 

63,212

 

(625,378)

 

(353,943)

 

82,636

 

(271,307)

Income before taxes

 

2,361,957

 

63,212

 

2,425,169

 

2,385,372

 

82,636

 

2,468,008

Social contribution

 

(209,872)

 

(5,644)

 

(215,516)

 

(221,235)

 

(7,437)

 

(228,672)

Income tax

 

(569,701)

 

(15,679)

 

(585,379)

 

(604,100)

 

(20,659)

 

(624,759)

                         

Net Income

 

1,582,384

 

41,889

 

1,624,273

 

1,560,037

 

54,540

 

1,614,577

                         

Net income attributable to controlling shareholders

 

1,530,403

 

41,889

 

1,572,292

 

1,538,281

 

56,870

 

1,595,151

Net income attributable to noncontrolling shareholders

 

51,981

 

-

 

51,981

 

21,756

 

(2,330)

 

19,426

                         

Earnings per share attributable to controlling shareholders:

                       

Basic (note 24)

 

1.59

 

0.04

 

1.63

 

1.60

 

0.06

 

1.66

Diluted (note 24)

 

1.59

 

0.04

 

1.63

 

1.60

 

0.06

 

1.66

 

 

    iii.        Statement of comprehensive income

 

 

   

2011

 

2010

   

Stated

 

Adjustment

 

Adjusted

 

Stated

 

Adjustment

 

Adjusted

Net income

 

1,582,384

 

41,890

 

1,624,273

 

1,560,037

 

54,540

 

1,614,577

Other comprehensive income

                       

Financial asset of concession

                       

- Gain in financial instruments

 

63,212

 

(63,212)

 

-

 

82,636

 

(82,636)

 

-

- Tax on financial instruments

 

(21,322)

 

21,322

 

-

 

(28,096)

 

28,096

 

-

Comprehensive income for the year

 

1,624,273

 

-

 

1,624,273

 

1,614,577

 

-

 

1,614,577

Comprehensive income attributable to controlling shareholders

 

1,572,292

 

-

 

1,572,292

 

1,595,151

 

-

 

1,595,151

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling shareholders

 

51,981

 

-

 

51,981

 

19,426

 

-

 

19,426

 

 

    iv.        Statement of cash flow

 

 

   

2011

 

2010

   

Stated

 

Adjustment

 

Adjusted

 

Stated

 

Adjustment

 

Adjusted

Operating cash flow

                       

Income for the year, before income tax and social contribution

 

2,361,957

 

63,212

 

2,425,169

 

2,385,372

 

82,636

 

2,468,008

Adjustment to reconcile income to cash provided by operating activities:

                       

Depreciation and amortization

 

801,203

 

-

 

801,203

 

691,793

 

-

 

691,793

Provision for tax, civil and labor risks

 

35,219

 

-

 

35,219

 

(29,598)

 

-

 

(29,598)

Interest and monetary restatement

 

1,168,617

 

(63,212)

 

1,105,405

 

613,946

 

(82,636)

 

531,310

Post-employment benefit costs

 

(82,953)

 

-

 

(82,953)

 

(80,629)

 

-

 

(80,629)

Losses on the write-off of non current assets

 

3,688

 

-

 

3,688

 

1,142

 

-

 

1,142

Deferred taxes (PIS and COFINS)

 

6,429

 

-

 

6,429

 

2,153

 

-

 

2,153

Other

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

536

 

-

 

536

                         

Increase in operating assets

 

(253,753)

 

-

 

(253,753)

 

(164,195)

 

-

 

(164,195)

Decrease in operating liabilities

 

(1,551,754)

 

-

 

(1,551,754)

 

(1,391,307)

 

-

 

(1,391,307)

Cash flows provided by operations

 

2,488,653

 

-

 

2,488,653

 

2,029,213

 

-

 

2,029,213

                         

Utilization of cash in investing activities

 

(2,487,531)

 

-

 

(2,487,531)

 

(1,801,887)

 

-

 

(1,801,887)

Generation (utilization) of cash in financing activities

 

1,135,819

 

-

 

1,135,819

 

(151,674)

 

-

 

(151,674)

 

 

( 3 )  SUMMARY OF THE SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these financial statements.

 

3.1 Concession agreements

IFRIC 12 – Concession Agreements establishes general guidelines for the recognition and measurement of obligations and rights related to concession agreements and applies to situations in which the granting power controls or regulates which services the concessionaire should provide with the infrastructure, to whom the services should be provided and at what price, and controls any significant residual interest in the infrastructure at the end of the concession period.

Considering these definitions having been attended, the infrastructure of distribution concessionaires is segregated at the time of construction in accordance with the IFRS standards, so that in the financial statements are record (i) an intangible asset corresponding to the right to operate the concession and collect from the users of public utilities, and (ii) a financial asset corresponding to the unconditional contractual right to receive cash (indemnity) by transferring control of the assets at the end of the concession to the grantor.          

F - 14


 
 

Table of Contents

 

The value of the financial assets of the concession is determined at fair value, based on the remuneration of the concession assets, as established by the regulatory body. The financial asset is classified as available-for-sale and after initial recognition is remeasured in accordance with changes in the estimated cash flows, against finance income in profit or loss for the year (note 2.8).

The remaining amount is recorded as intangible assets and relates to the right to charge consumers for electric energy distribution services, and is amortized in accordance with the consumption pattern that reflects the estimated economic benefit to the end of the concession.

Services related to the construction of infrastructure are recorded in accordance with IAS 11 – Construction Contracts, against a financial asset corresponding to the amount subject to right to receive cash (indemnity). Residual amounts are classified as intangible assets and are amortized over the term of the concession in proportion to a curve that reflects the consumption pattern in relation to the economic benefits.

Considering that (i) the tariff model that does not provide for a profit margin for the infrastructure construction services, (ii) the way in which the subsidiaries manage the building the infrastructure by using a high level of outsourcing, and (iii) the fact that there is no provision for profit margin on construction in the Company‘s business plans, Management is of the opinion that the margins on this operation are irrelevant, and therefore no mark-up to the cost is considered in revenue. The revenue and construction costs are therefore presented in profit or loss for the year at the same amounts.

 

3.2 Financial instruments

- Financial assets

Financial assets are recognized initially on the date that they are originated or on trade date at which the Company or its subsidiaries become parties to the contractual provisions of the instrument. Derecognition of a financial asset occurs when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire or when the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset are transferred. The Company and its subsidiaries hold the following main financial assets:

 i.         Fair value through profit or loss: these are assets held for trading or designated as such upon initial recognition. The Company and its subsidiaries manage such assets and make purchase and sale decisions based on their fair value in accordance with their documented risk management or investment strategy. These financial assets are measured at fair value, and changes therein are recognized in profit or loss for the year.

ii.        Held-to-maturity: these are assets that the Company and its subsidiaries have the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity. Held-to-maturity financial assets are recognized initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment losses.

iii.       Loans and receivables: these are assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Such assets are recognized initially at fair value and subsequently  measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment losses.

iv.       Available-for-sale: these are non-derivative financial assets that are designated as available-for-sale or that are not classified in any of the previous categories. Subsequent to initial recognition, interest calculated using the effective rate method is recognized in profit or loss as part of the financial income. Changes to fair value of these financial assets are recognized in the other comprehensive income. The accumulated result in the other comprehensive income is transferred to profit or loss when the asset is realized.

The main asset of the Company and its subsidiaries classified in this category the financial assets the concession which comprises the right for compensation at the end of the concession. The designation of this instrument as available-for-sale is due to its non-classification in the previous categories described. Since Management believes that the compensation will be made at least in accordance with the current tariff pricing model, this instrument cannot be recorded as loans and receivables as the compensation is not fixed or determinable, due to the uncertainty in relation to impairment for reasons other than deterioration of the credit. The main uncertainties relate to the risk of non-recognition of part of these assets and their respective replacement values at the end of the concession by the regulatory authority.

 

 

F - 15


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

- Financial liabilities

Financial liabilities are initially recognized on the date that they are originated or on the trade date at which the Company or its subsidiaries become a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. The Company and its subsidiaries have the following main financial liabilities:

 i.        Measured at fair value through profit or loss: these are financial liabilities that are: (i) held for short-term trading, (ii) designated at fair value in order match the effects of recognition of income and expenses to obtain more relevant and consistent accounting information, or (iii) derivatives. These liabilities are recorded at fair value and any change in their fair value is subsequently recorded in profit or loss.

ii.        Other financial liabilities (not measured at fair value through profit or loss): these are other financial liabilities not classified in the previous category. They are measured initially at fair value net of any transaction cost and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

The Company accounts for guarantees when issued to non-controlled entities or when the financial guarantee is granted to jointly-controlled entity at a percentage higher than the Company's interest to cover commitments of jointly-controlled entities. Such financial guarantees are initially measured at fair value, by recording (i) a liability corresponding to the risk of non-payment of the debt, which is amortized against financial income simultaneously and in proportion with amortization of the debt, and (ii) an asset equivalent to the right to compensation by the guaranteed party or a prepaid expense under the guarantees, which is amortized by receipt of cash from other shareholders or at the effective interest rate over the term of the guarantee. After initial recognition, the liability related to the financial guarantee is assessed periodically at the higher of the amount determined in accordance with IAS 37 and the amount initially recognized, less accumulated amortization.

Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount presented when, and only when, there is a legal right to offset the amounts and the intent to settle on a net basis or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.

 

- Capital

Common shares are classified as equity. Additional costs directly attributable to share issues and share options are recognized as a deduction from equity, net of any tax effects.

 

3.3 Lease agreements

At the inception of an agreement is determined whether such arrangement is or contains a lease. A specific asset is the subject of a lease if fulfillment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of that specified asset. An arrangement conveys the right to use the asset if the arrangement conveys to the lessor the right to control the use of the underlying asset.

Leases in which substantially all the risks and rewards are with the lessor are classified as operating leases. Payments/receipts made under operating leases are recognized as expense/revenue in profit or loss on a straight-line basis, over the term of the lease.

Leases which involve not only the right to use assets, but also substantially transfer the risks and rewards to the lessee, are classified as finance leases.

 

F - 16


 
 

Table of Contents

 

In finance leases in which the Company or its subsidiaries act as lessee, the assets are capitalized to property, plant and equipment at the commencement of the lease against a liability measured at an amount equal to the lower of its fair value and the present value of the minimum future lease payments. Property, plant and equipment are depreciated based on the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term.

If the Company or its subsidiaries are the lessor in a finance lease, the investment is initially recognized at the construction/acquisition cost of the asset.

In both cases, the financial income/expense is recognized in profit or loss over the term of the lease so as to produce a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the investment/liability.

 

3.4 Property, plant and equipment

Items of property, plant and equipment are measured at acquisition, construction or formation cost less accumulated depreciation and, if applicable, accumulated impairment losses. Cost also includes any other costs attributable to bringing the assets to the place and in a condition to operate as intended by Management, the cost of dismantling and removing the items and restoring the site on which they are located and capitalized borrowing costs on qualifying assets.

The replacement cost of items of property, plant and equipment is recognized if it is probable that it will involve economic benefits for the subsidiaries and if the cost can be reliably measured, and the value of the replaced item is written off. Maintenance costs are recognized in profit or loss as they are incurred

Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis, at annual rates of 2% to 17%, taking into consideration the estimated useful life of the assets, as instructed and defined by the regulatory authority.

In the case of generators subject to regulation by Decree 2003, of 1996 (the subsidiary CERAN and the jointly-controlled entities ENERCAN, BAESA and Foz do Chapecó), the assets are depreciated at the rates established by the regulatory authority, provided they do not exceed the term of the concession.

Gains and losses derived from write off of an item of property, plant and equipment are determined by comparing the resources produced by disposal with the carrying amount of the asset, and are recognized net together with other operating income/expense.

Assets and facilities used in the regulated activities are tied to these services and may not be removed, disposed of, assigned or pledged in mortgage without the prior and express authorization of ANEEL. ANEEL regulates the release of Public Electric Energy Utility concession assets, granting prior authorization for release of assets of no use to the concession, intended for disposal, and determines that the proceeds of the disposal be deposited in a tied bank account for use in the concession. 

 

3.5 Intangible assets

Includes rights related to non-physical assets such as goodwill and concession exploitation rights, software and rights-of-way.

Goodwill that arises on the acquisition of subsidiaries is measured at the difference between the amount paid and/or payable for acquisition of a business and the net fair value of the assets and liabilities of the subsidiary acquired.

Goodwill is measured at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill and other intangible assets, if any, with indefinite useful lives are not subject to amortization and are tested annually for impairment.

Negative goodwill is recorded as gain in the income statement in the year of the business acquisition.

Intangible assets corresponding to the right to operate concessions may have three origins, as follows:

 

F - 17


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 i.         Acquisitions through business combinations: the portion arising from business combinations that corresponds to the right to operate the concession is stated as an intangible asset. Such amounts are amortized over the remaining term of the concessions, on a straight-line basis or based on the net income curves projected for the concessionaires, as applicable.

 

ii.        Investments in infrastructure (Application IFRIC 12 – Concession agreements): under the electric energy distribution concession agreements with the subsidiaries, the intangible asset recorded corresponds to the concessionaires' right to charge the consumers for use of the concession infrastructure. Since the exploitation term is defined in the agreement, intangible assets with defined useful lives are amortized over the term of the concession in proportion to a curve that reflects the consumption pattern in relation to the economic benefits. For further information see note 3.1.

 

        Components of the infrastructure are directly tied to the Company’s operations and may not be removed, disposed of, assigned or pledged in mortgage without the prior and express authorization of ANEEL. ANEEL regulates the release of Public Electric Energy Utility concession assets, granting prior authorization for release of assets of no use to the concession, intended for disposal, and determines that the proceeds of the disposal be deposited in a tied bank account for use in the concession 

 

iii.       Public utilities: upon certain generation concessions were granted the concessionaires assumed an obligation to pay the federal government for use of public assets. On the signing date of the respective agreements the Company’s subsidiaries recoded intangible assets and the corresponding liabilities at fair value. The intangible assets, capitalized by interest incurred on the obligation until the start-up date, are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of each concession.   

 

3.6 Impairment

- Financial assets:

A financial asset not measured at fair value through profit or loss is reassessed at each reporting date to determine whether there is objective evidence that it is impaired.  Impairment can occur after the initial recognition of the asset and have a negative effect on the estimated future cash flows.

The Company and its subsidiaries consider evidence of impairment of receivables and held-to-maturity investment securities for both specific asset and at a collective level for all significant securities. Receivables and held-to-maturity investment securities that are not individually significant are collectively assessed for impairment by grouping together the securities with similar risk characteristics.

In assessing collective impairment the Company uses historical trends of the probability of default, timing of recoveries and the amount of loss incurred, adjusted for management's judgment as to whether the assumptions and current economic and credit conditions are such that the actual losses are likely to be higher or lower than suggested by historic trends.

An impairment loss of a financial asset is recognized as follows:

·       Amortized cost: as the difference between the carrying amount and the present value of the estimated future cash flows discounted at the asset’s original effective interest rate. Losses are recognized in profit or loss and shown in an allowance account against receivables. Interest on the impaired asset continues to be recognized through the unwinding of the discount. When a subsequent event indicates that the amount of impairment loss has decreased, this reduction is reversed to credit through profit or loss.

·       Available-for-sale: as the difference between the acquisition cost, net of any principal repayment and amortization of the principal, and the current fair value, less any impairment loss previously recognized in profit or loss. Losses are recognized in profit or loss.

In the case of financial assets recorded at amortized cost and/or debt instruments classified as available-for-sale, if an increase (gain) is identified in subsequent periods, the impairment loss is reversed through profit or loss. However, any subsequent recovery in the fair value of an impaired equity instrument classified as available-for-sale is recognized in other comprehensive income.

F - 18


 
 

Table of Contents

 

- Non-financial assets

Non-financial assets that have indefinite useful lives, such as goodwill, are tested annually for impairment to assess whether the asset's carrying amount does not exceed its recoverable value. Other assets subject to amortization are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate that the carrying amount may be impaired.

An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated recoverable amount, which is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell.

The methods used to assess impairment include tests based on the asset's value in use. In such cases, the assets (e.g. goodwill, concession asset) are segregated and grouped together at the lowest level that generates identifiable cash inflows (the "cash generating unit", or CGU). If there is an indication of impairment, the loss is recognized in profit or loss. Except in the case of goodwill impairment which cannot be reversed in the subsequent period, impairment losses are reassessed annually for any possibility of reversals.

 

3.7 Provisions

A provision is recognized if, as a result of a past event, there is a legal or constructive obligation that can be estimated reliably, and it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation. When applicable, provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash outflows at a rate that reflects current market assessment and the risks specific to the liability.

 

3.8 Employee benefits

Certain subsidiaries have post-employment benefits and pension plans, recognized by the accrual method in accordance with IAS 19 “Employee benefits”, and are regarded as sponsors of these plans. Although the plans have particularities, they have the following characteristics::

 i.        Defined distribution plan: a post-employment benefit plan under which the Sponsor pays fixed contributions into a separate entity and will have no liability for the actuarial deficits of this plan. The obligations are recognized as an expense in profit or loss in the periods during which the services are rendered.

ii.        Defined benefit plan: The net obligation is calculated as the difference between the present value of the actuarial obligation based on assumptions, biometric studies and interest rates in line with market rates, and the fair value of the plan assets as of the reporting date. The actuarial liability is calculated annually by independent actuaries, under the responsibility of Management, using the projected unit credit method. The subsidiaries used the corridor method until December 31, 2012, to avoid fluctuations in the macroeconomic conditions distorting the profit or loss for the period. The accumulated differences between the actuarial estimates and the actual results are therefore not recognized in the financial statements unless they are in excess of 10% of the greater of the plan liabilities and assets. Unrecognized gains and losses in excess of this limit are recognized in profit or loss in subsequent years over the estimated remaining service time of the employees. If the plan records a surplus and it becomes necessary to recognize an asset, recognition is limited to the total of any unrecognized past service costs and the present value of future economic benefits available in the form of reimbursements or future reductions in contributions to the plan.

 

3.9 Dividends and Interest on shareholders’ equity

Under Brazilian law, the Company is required to distribute a mandatory minimum annual dividend of 25% of net income adjusted in accordance with the Company´s bylaws. According to IAS 10 a provision may only be made for the minimum mandatory dividend, and dividends declared but not yet approved are only recognized as a liability in the financial statements after approval by the competent body. They will therefore be held in equity, in the “additional dividend proposed” account, as they do not meet the present liability criteria at the reporting date.

F - 19


 
 

Table of Contents

 

As established in the Company's bylaws and in accordance with current Corporate law, the Board of Directors is responsible for declaring an interim dividend and Interest on shareholders’ equity determined in a half-yearly balance sheet. An interim dividend and interest on shareholders’ equity declared at the base date of June 30 is only recorded as a liability in the Company's financial statement after the date of the Board's decision.

Interest on shareholders' equity is treated in the same way as dividends and is also stated in changes in shareholders’ equity. Withholding tax on interest on shareholders' equity is debited against shareholders’ equity when proposed by Management, as it fulfills the obligation criteria at that time.

 

3.10 Revenue recognition

Operating income in the course of ordinary activities of the subsidiaries is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Operating revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence exists that the most significant risks and rewards have been transferred to the buyer, when it is probable that the financial and economic rewards will flow to the entity, the associated costs can be reliably estimated, and the amount of the operating income can be reliably measured.

Revenue from distribution of electric energy is recognized when the energy is billed. Unbilled revenue related to the monthly billing cycle is appropriated based on the actual amount of energy provided in the month and the annualized loss rate. Revenue from energy generation sales is accounted for based on the assured energy and at tariffs specified in the terms of the contract or the current market price, as applicable. Energy commercialization revenue is accounted for based on bilateral contracts with market agents and duly registered with the Electric Energy Commercialization Chamber - CCEE. No single consumer represents 10% or more of the total billing of each subsidiary.

Service revenue is recognized when the service is effectively provided, under a service agreement between the parties.

Revenue from construction contracts is recognized based on the percentage of completion method (“fixed-price”), and losses, if any, are recognized in profit or loss as incurred.

 

3.11 Income tax and Social contribution

Income tax and Social contribution expense is calculated and recognized in accordance with the legislation in force and comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax is recorded in profit or loss except to the extent that it relates to an item recorded directly in equity or in equity adjustments, where it is recorded net of these tax effects.

Current tax is the expected tax payable or receivable/to be offset on the taxable income or loss. Deferred tax is recognized for temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for accounting purposes and the equivalent amounts used for tax purposes and for tax loss carryforwards.   

The Company and certain subsidiaries recorded in their financial statements the effects of tax loss carryforwards and deductible temporary differences, based on projections of future taxable profits, approved annually by the Boards of Directors and examined by the Fiscal Council. The subsidiaries also recognized tax credits on merged goodwill, which is amortized in proportion to the individual projected net incomes for the remaining term of each concession agreement.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax liabilities and assets, and they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity.

Deferred income tax and social contribution assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized.

 

F - 20


 
 

Table of Contents

 

3.12 Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing the profit or loss for the year attributable to the Company’s controlling shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share are calculated by dividing the profit or loss for the year attributable to the controlling shareholders, adjusted by the effects of financial instruments that potentially would have impacted the profit or loss for the year by the weighted average of the number of shares outstanding, adjusted by the effects of all dilutive potential convertible notes for the reporting periods, in accordance with IAS 33.

 

3.13 Regulatory assets and liabilities

In accordance with the interpretation of IASB/IFRIC, regulatory assets and liabilities cannot be recognized in the financial statements of the distribution subsidiaries, as they do not meet the requirements for assets and liabilities described in the Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements. The rights or offsetting are therefore only reflected in the financial statements, after they have been recognized in the energy tariffs, based on the tariff reviews conducted by the grantor and on consumption of electric energy by captive consumers.

 

3.14 New standards and interpretations not yet adopted

A number of new IFRS standards and amendments to the standards and interpretations were issued by the IASB and had not yet come into effect for the year ended December 31, 2012. Consequently, the Company has not adopted them for the year ended December 31, 2012:

·       Amendment to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements

Provides the option to present profit or loss and other comprehensive income in either a single statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. It also requires additional disclosures in respect of the separation of items of comprehensive income that (i) will subsequently be reclassified to profit or loss and (ii) items that will not be reclassified. Applicable for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2012.

Management is analyzing the effects of these amendments and based on a preliminary analysis, does not expect them to have relevant impacts on the financial statements.

·       Amendment to IAS 19 Employee Benefits

The amendments change the accounting for defined benefit plans and termination benefits.  The most significant changes relate to: a) elimination of the “corridor approach”; b) immediate recognition in profit or loss of past service costs; c) immediate recognition of actuarial gains and losses through other comprehensive income; and d) replacement of interest expense and the expected return on plan assets with a “net interest” amount, calculated by applying the discount rate to the net defined benefit asset or liability. The amendments to IAS 19 are required for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and require retrospective application.

Based on a preliminary assessment of initial adoption of these changes in 2013, Management estimates that the effect would be a decrease of R$ 515,932 in the Shareholders’ equity at January 1, 2013 (increase of R$ 109,371 in the Shareholders’ equity at January 1, 2012).

The review of IAS 19 will also results in a change in recognition of actuarial expense in 2013, and with introduction of the new methodology in 2013, the actuarial expense is estimated to be R$82,121 (note 17), compared to R$ 32,421 if the previous pronouncement were still in effect.

·       Amendment to IFRS 7 e IAS 32 - Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

The amendments to IAS 32 clarify the requirements for offsetting financial instruments and the amendments to IFRS 7 introduce new disclosure requirements for financial assets and liabilities offset in the balance sheet. The amendments to IFRS 7 are required for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, while the amendments to IAS 32 are required for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014.

 

F - 21


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Management is analyzing the effects of these amendments and based on a preliminary analysis does not expect them to have relevant impacts on the financial statements.

·       IFRS 9 Financial Instruments

Establishes new requirements for the classification and measurement of financial assets and liabilities. Financial assets will be classified in two categories: measured on initial recognition at fair value and measured at amortized cost, based on the business model within which they are held and the characteristics of their contractual cash flows. With regard to financial liabilities, the main change in respect of the requirements already established by IAS 39 requires that the amount of change in the fair value of financial liabilities designated as at fair value through profit or loss, that is attributable to changes in the credit risk of that liability, is presented in other comprehensive income and not in profit or loss, unless the recognition of the effects of change would result in a mismatch in profit or loss. Adoption is required for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2015.

The Company is analyzing the impact of these changes on the financial statements. 

·       Revison of IAS 27 – Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements

This revision, published in May 2011, establishes the requirement for accounting for and disclosure of investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates if the entity prepares separate financial statements. The revision of the standard is effective from January 1, 2013.

Management is analyzing the effects of this revision and based on a preliminary analysis does not anticipate relevant impacts on the financial statements.

·       IAS 28 – Investments in Associates

This revision, published in May 2011, establishes the requirements for application of the equity method for investments in associates and jointly-controlled entities as from publication of IFRS 11. The revision of the standard is effective from January 1, 2013.

Management is analyzing the effects of this revision and based on a preliminary analysis, does not anticipate relevant impacts on the financial statements.

·       IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements

IFRS 10 replaces the part of IAS 27 that deals with consolidated financial statements.  Under IFRS 10, there is only one basis for consolidation, and that basis is control. The definition of control in IFRS 10 includes three elements: (i) power over an investee; (ii) exposure, or rights to variable returns from its involvement; and (iii) ability to use its power over the investee to affect the amount of the investor’s returns. Applicable to annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company does not anticipate that this pronouncement will have a significant impact on its financial statements

·       IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements

IFRS 11 replaces IAS 31 and deals with how a joint control arrangement should be classified in the financial statements. Under the standard, the structure of a joint arrangement is no longer the main factor in determining the type of business and consequently, how it should be accounted for. Joint ventures, operations in which the parties have rights over the net assets of the agreements, are required to be accounted for using the equity method of accounting and the proportional consolidation method will no longer be permitted.

IFRS 11 is applicable for years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and consequently, starting in 2013, the Company will no longer consolidate proportionally the jointly-controlled entities ENERCAN, BAESA, Foz do Chapecó and EPASA (note 2.5). This pronouncement will not impact the Company's net income as the Company will account for these jointly-controlled entities using the equity method, however there will be changes in the individual line items in the Company statement of income.

·       IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities

Consolidates all the disclosure requirements concerning an entity's interest in subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates and structured unconsolidated entities. The standard requires disclosure of information in respect of the nature of, risks associated with and financial effects of such interests. Adoption is required from January 1, 2013.

F - 22


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Management is analyzing the effects of this pronouncement and based on a preliminary analysis, does not anticipate relevant impacts on the financial statements.

·       IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement

IFRS 13 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and disclosure requirements. Except in specified circumstances, IFRS 13 applies when measurement or disclosure of fair value is required or permitted by other IFRS standards. Effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company is analyzing the impacts on the financial statements.

These standards and amendments to standards were not early applied in preparation of these financial statements.

 

( 4 )  DETERMINATION OF FAIR VALUES

 

A number of the Group’s accounting policies and disclosures require the determination of fair value, for both financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. Fair values have been determined for measurement and / or disclosure purposes based on the following methods. When applicable, further information about the assumptions made in determining fair values is disclosed in the notes specific to that asset or liability.

- Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets

The fair value of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets recognized as a result of a business combination is based on market values. The fair value is the estimated amount for which a property could be exchanged on the date of valuation between knowledgeable and willing parties under normal market conditions. The fair value of items of property, plant and equipment is based on the market approach and cost approaches using quoted market prices for similar items when available and replacement cost when appropriate. The fair values of intangible assets are calculated using quoted prices in an active market. Where there is no active market, the fair value will be what the Company would have paid for the intangible assets, on the acquisition date, in an arm’s length transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties based on the best information available.

- Financial instruments

Financial instruments measured at fair values were valued based on quoted prices in an active market, or, if such prices were not available, assessed using pricing models, applied individually for each transaction, taking into consideration the future payment flows, based on the conditions contracted, discounted to present value at market interest rate curves, based on information obtained from the BM&FBOVESPA S.A – Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias e Futuros (“BM&FBOVESPA”) and “Associação Brasileira das Entidades dos Mercados Financeiro e de Capitais – ANBIMA” (note 33).

Financial assets classified as available-for-sale refer to the right to compensation, to be paid by the Federal Government regarding the assets of the distribution concessionaires when the concession contract is over. The methodology adopted for marking these assets to market is based on the tariff review process for distributors. This review, conducted every four or five years according to each concessionaire, involves assessing the replacement price for the distribution infrastructure, in accordance with criteria established by the regulatory body. This valuation basis is used for pricing the tariff, which is increased annually up to the next tariff review, based on the parameter of the main inflation indices.

Provisional Measure 579 of September 11, 2012, converted into Law nº 12783 on January 11, 2013, established that, for concession contracts that expire by 2017, calculation of the amount of compensation due on reversal of the assets will be based on the replacement value method, according to regulatory criteria to be established the granting authority. In the case of concessions terms that expire after 2017, Management believes that, as under Provisional Measure 579, compensation will be based at least on valuation of the assets using the new replacement value model.

 

F - 23


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Accordingly, at the time of the tariff review, each concessionaire adjusts the position of the financial asset base for compensation at the amounts ratified by the regulatory authority and uses the General Market Price Index - IGP-M as best estimate for adjusting the original base to the fair value at subsequent dates, in accordance with the Tariff Review process.

 

( 5 )  CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

 

December 31,
2012

 

December 31,
2011

Bank balances

243,875

 

147,126

Short-term financial investments

2,234,018

 

2,552,710

Overnight investment (a)

56,369

 

30,551

Bank deposit certificates (b)

228,818

 

268,734

Investment funds (c)

1,935,982

 

1,815,938

Repurchase agreements with debentures (b)

12,849

 

437,488

Total

2,477,894

 

2,699,837

 

a)      Current account balances, which earn daily interest by investment in repurchase agreements secured on debentures and interest of 20% of the variation in the Interbank Deposit Certificate - CDI.

b)     Short-term investments in Bank Deposit Certificates and secured debentures conducted with major financial institutions that operate in the Brazilian financial market, with daily liquidity, low credit risk and interest equivalent, on average, to 100% of the CDI.

c)      Amounts invested in an Exclusive Fund, involving investments subject to floating rates tied to the CDI in federal government bonds, CDBs, secured debentures of major financial institutions, with daily liquidity, low credit risk and interest equivalent, on average, to 101% of CDI.

 

F - 24


 
 

Table of Contents

 

( 6 )  CONSUMERS, CONCESSIONAIRES AND LICENSEES

 

In the financial statements, the balance derives mainly from the supply of electric energy. The following table shows the breakdown at December 31, 2012 and 2011

 

                   
     

Past due

 

Total

 

Amounts
coming due

 

until 90 days

 

> 90 days

 

December 31,
2012

 

December 31,
2011

Current

                 

Consumer classes

                 

Residential

358,257

 

243,429

 

38,895

 

640,581

 

573,936

Industrial

132,769

 

60,073

 

32,839

 

225,681

 

227,474

Commercial

149,469

 

51,929

 

15,024

 

216,422

 

195,270

Rural

35,931

 

8,368

 

1,502

 

45,801

 

43,612

Public administration

35,741

 

8,097

 

1,273

 

45,111

 

34,601

Public lighting

30,509

 

5,656

 

13,588

 

49,753

 

42,270

Public utilities

40,312

 

7,367

 

1,656

 

49,335

 

41,560

Billed

782,987

 

384,919

 

104,777

 

1,272,683

 

1,158,723

Unbilled

597,556

 

-

 

-

 

597,556

 

427,661

Financing of Consumers' Debts

80,091

 

11,368

 

45,787

 

137,246

 

136,882

Free energy

3,764

 

-

 

-

 

3,764

 

3,674

CCEE transactions

19,041

 

-

 

-

 

19,041

 

17,961

Concessionaires and Licensees

327,964

 

-

 

-

 

327,964

 

207,204

Allowance for doubtful accounts

-

 

-

 

(112,335)

 

(112,335)

 

(85,318)

Other

22,683

 

-

 

-

 

22,683

 

7,493

Total

1,834,086

 

396,287

 

38,229

 

2,268,601

 

1,874,280

                   

Non current

                 

Financing of Consumers' Debts

136,369

 

-

 

-

 

136,369

 

140,999

Allowance for doubtful accounts

(16,240)

 

-

 

-

 

(16,240)

 

-

CCEE transactions

41,301

 

-

 

-

 

41,301

 

41,301

Concessionaires and Licensees

588

 

-

 

-

 

588

 

-

Total

162,018

 

-

 

-

 

162,017

 

182,300

 

Financing of Consumers' Debts - Refers to the negotiation of overdue receivables from consumers, principally public organizations. Payment of some of these credits is guaranteed by the debtors, in the case of public entities, by pledging the bank accounts through which their ICMS (VAT) revenue is received. Allowances for doubtful accounts are based on best estimates of the subsidiaries' Managements for unsecured amounts and losses regarded as probable.

Electric Energy Trading Chamber (CCEE) transactions - The amounts refer to the sale of electric energy on the short-term market. The noncurrent amount receivable mainly comprises: (i) adjustments of entries made by the CCEE in response to certain legal decisions (preliminary orders) in the accounting processes for the period from September 2000 to December 2002; and (ii) provisional accounting entries established by the CCEE. The subsidiaries consider that there is no significant risk on the realization of these assets and consequently no valuation allowance was recorded for these transactions.

Concessionaires and Licensees - Refers basically to accounts receivable in respect of the supply of electric energy to other concessionaires and licensees, mainly by the subsidiaries CPFL Geração, CPFL Brasil and CPFL Renováveis.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

Changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts are shown below:

 

F - 25


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

At December 31, 2009

(81,974)

Allowance for doubtful accounts

(108,663)

Recovery of revenue

56,995

Write-off of accounts receivable and provisioned

52,951

At December 31, 2010

(80,692)

Allowance for doubtful accounts

(116,722)

Recovery of revenue

46,049

Write-off of accounts receivable and provisioned

66,047

At December 31, 2011

(85,318)

Allowance for doubtful accounts

(187,712)

Recovery of revenue

23,809

Write-off of accounts receivable and provisioned

98,742

At December 31, 2012

(150,480)

Allowance for doubtful accounts - Consumers, concessionaires and licensees

 

Current  

(112,335)

Non current

(16,240)

Allowance for doubtful accounts - Other Credits (note 11)

(21,905)

 

( 7 )  RECOVERABLE TAXES

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

Current

     

Prepayments of social contribution - CSLL

3,310

 

7,347

Prepayments of income tax - IRPJ

12,309

 

1,349

IRRF on interest on equity

17,654

 

31,345

Income tax and social contribution to be offset

22,946

 

20,557

Withholding tax - IRRF

69,250

 

105,635

ICMS to be offset

84,487

 

69,329

Social Integration Program - PIS

9,609

 

7,546

Contribution for Social Security financing- COFINS

40,118

 

30,136

National Social Security Institute - INSS

3,255

 

2,123

Other

466

 

2,096

Total

263,403

 

277,463

       

Noncurrent

     

Social contribution to be offset - CSLL

39,466

 

36,277

Income tax to be offset - IRPJ

10,976

 

1,001

ICMS to be offset

126,061

 

112,423

Social Integration Program - PIS

8,630

 

11,757

Contribution for Social Security financing- COFINS

39,504

 

53,843

Other

399

 

1,413

Total

225,036

 

216,715

 

Social contribution to be offset – In noncurrent, the balance refers primarily to the final favorable decision in a lawsuit filed by the subsidiary CPFL Paulista. The subsidiary CPFL Paulista is awaiting the normal course of permission by the Federal tax authority in order to systematically offset the credit.

ICMS (VAT) to be offset – mainly refers to the credit recorded on acquisition of assets that result in the recognition of intangible assets and financial assets.

 

F - 26


 
 

Table of Contents

 

PIS and COFINS – In noncurrent, the balance refers basically to credits recognized by the indirect subsidiaries EPASA and CPFL Renováveis in relation to the acquisition of equipment, which will be realized by depreciation of the equipment.

 

( 8 )  DEFERRED TAXES

 

8.1- Breakdown of tax credits and debits:

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

Social contribution credit / (debit)

     

Tax loss carryforwards

56,074

 

56,436

Tax benefit of merged goodwill

137,773

 

154,511

Deductible temporary differences

(176,302)

 

(197,753)

Subtotal

17,545

 

13,194

       

Income tax credit / (debit)

     

Tax losses

144,567

 

165,736

Tax benefit of merged goodwill

468,844

 

524,685

Deductible temporary differences

(526,424)

 

(558,909)

Subtotal

86,987

 

131,512

       

PIS and COFINS (debit)

     

Deductible temporary differences

58,353

 

(6,272)

       

Total

162,885

 

138,434

       

Total tax credit

1,318,618

 

1,176,535

Total tax debit

(1,155,733)

 

(1,038,101)

 

8.2 - Tax benefit of merged goodwill:

Refers to the tax credit calculated on the goodwill derived from the acquisition of subsidiaries, as shown in the following table, which has been incorporated and is recognized in accordance with CVM Instructions nº 319/99 and nº 349/01. The benefit is realized in proportion to amortization of the merged goodwill that gave rise to it, in accordance with the projected net income of the subsidiaries during the remaining term of the concession, as shown in note 13.

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

CSLL

 

IRPJ

 

CSLL

 

IRPJ

CPFL Paulista

77,253

 

214,590

 

85,709

 

238,079

CPFL Piratininga

17,662

 

60,609

 

19,404

 

66,584

RGE

34,268

 

141,518

 

37,714

 

155,750

CPFL Santa Cruz

2,655

 

8,349

 

3,545

 

11,148

CPFL Leste Paulista

1,493

 

4,545

 

2,024

 

6,155

CPFL Sul Paulista

2,151

 

6,712

 

2,944

 

9,183

CPFL Jaguari

1,299

 

3,950

 

1,745

 

5,289

CPFL Mococa

807

 

2,502

 

1,121

 

3,483

CPFL Geração

-

 

25,613

 

-

 

28,167

CPFL Serviços

186

 

455

 

306

 

847

Total

137,773

 

468,844

 

154,511

 

524,685

               

 

F - 27


 
 

Table of Contents

 

8.3 - Accumulated balances on Deductible temporary differences:

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

CSLL

 

IRPJ

 

PIS/COFINS

 

CSLL

 

IRPJ

 

PIS/COFINS

Deductible temporary differences

                     

Reserve for tax, civil, labor and environmental risks

23,314

 

64,203

 

-

 

19,246

 

54,009

 

-

Private pension fund

1,387

 

4,850

 

-

 

2,218

 

7,159

 

-

Allowance for doubtful accounts

13,283

 

36,895

 

-

 

7,656

 

21,306

 

-

Free energy provision

4,884

 

13,569

 

-

 

4,365

 

12,128

 

-

Research and Development and Energy Efficiency Programs

12,687

 

35,237

 

-

 

12,642

 

35,118

 

-

Programs Profit-sharing

3,151

 

8,741

 

-

 

2,842

 

7,886

 

-

Depreciation rate difference - Revaluation

7,599

 

21,108

 

-

 

8,315

 

23,096

 

-

Recognition of the concession - adjustment of intangible assets

(2,024)

 

(5,621)

 

-

 

(2,248)

 

(6,244)

 

-

Recognition of the concession - financial adjustment

(43,062)

 

(119,617)

 

-

 

(30,938)

 

(85,938)

 

-

Reversal of regulatory assets and liabilities

48,048

 

133,468

 

57,475

 

(7,160)

 

(19,890)

 

(8,109)

Actuarial losses on the transition of accounting practices

26,140

 

72,903

 

-

 

26,162

 

72,964

 

-

Other adjustments changes in practices

19,620

 

55,590

 

-

 

18,971

 

52,697

 

-

Accelerated depreciation

(2,483)

 

(6,897)

 

-

 

(807)

 

(2,243)

 

-

Other

9,890

 

21,271

 

878

 

4,399

 

9,984

 

1,838

Deductible temporary differences - comprehensive income:

                     

Property, plant and equipment - deemed cost adjustments

(75,704)

 

(210,316)

 

-

 

(79,590)

 

(221,082)

 

-

Deductible temporary differences - Business combination - CPFL Renováveis

                     

Deferred taxes - asset:

                     

Fair value of property, plant and equipment (negative value added of assets)

28,644

 

79,566

 

-

 

14,551

 

40,421

 

-

Other temporary differences

22,109

 

29,147

 

-

 

12,848

 

26,464

 

-

Deferred taxes - liability:

                     

Value added derived from determination of deemed cost

(7,249)

 

(20,137)

 

-

 

(8,511)

 

(23,641)

 

-

Value added of assets received from the former ERSA

(96,452)

 

(267,924)

 

-

 

(98,896)

 

(274,713)

 

-

Intangible asset - exploration right/authorization Jantus, Santa Luzia, Complex Atlântica and BVP

(163,766)

 

(454,907)

 

-

 

(100,056)

 

(277,934)

 

-

Other temporary differences

(6,319)

 

(17,552)

 

-

 

(3,764)

 

(10,455)

 

-

Total

(176,302)

 

(526,424)

 

58,353

 

(197,753)

 

(558,909)

 

(6,272)

 

8.4 - Reconciliation of the amounts of income tax and social contribution reported in the income statements for 2011, 2010 and 2009:

  

 

2012

 

2011 (¹)

 

2010 (¹)

 

CSLL

 

IRPJ

 

CSLL

 

IRPJ

 

CSLL

 

IRPJ

Income before taxes

2,003,481

 

2,003,481

 

2,425,169

 

2,425,169

 

2,468,008

 

2,468,008

Adjustments to reflect effective rate:

                     

Amortization of intangible asset acquired

107,888

 

137,747

 

115,947

 

147,784

 

115,782

 

146,194

Tax incentives - PIIT (Technological innovation incentive program)

(11,895)

 

(11,895)

 

(13,480)

 

(13,480)

 

(6,058)

 

(22,380)

Effect of presumed profit system

(134,078)

 

(135,098)

 

(94,579)

 

(143,977)

 

(17,622)

 

(20,448)

Adjustment of excess and surplus revenue of reactive

32,260

 

32,260

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

Other permanent additions, net

106,824

 

79,329

 

65,312

 

30,529

 

28,427

 

(19,008)

Calculation base

2,104,481

 

2,105,825

 

2,498,369

 

2,446,026

 

2,588,537

 

2,552,366

Statutory rate

9%

 

25%

 

9%

 

25%

 

9%

 

25%

Tax debit result

(189,403)

 

(526,456)

 

(224,853)

 

(611,507)

 

(232,968)

 

(638,092)

Tax credit (not recorded) / recorded, net

(9,584)

 

(21,304)

 

9,337

 

26,127

 

4,296

 

13,333

Total

(198,987)

 

(547,760)

 

(215,517)

 

(585,380)

 

(228,672)

 

(624,759)

                       

Current

(252,568)

 

(674,700)

 

(197,365)

 

(538,543)

 

(200,878)

 

(554,443)

Deferred

53,581

 

126,940

 

(18,151)

 

(46,836)

 

(27,794)

 

(70,316)

(¹) Includes the effects described in note 2.8

                     

 

Amortization of intangible asset acquired –  Refers to the non-deductible portion of amortization of intangible assets derived from the acquisition of investees.

Tax credit (not recorded)/recorded, net – Credits not recorded/recorded by the Company on tax loss carryforwards in the light of a revision of projections, which resulted in a margin recorded to complete the accounting entries.

8.5 Unrecognized tax credits

The parent company has unassessed tax loss and social contribution carryforwards amounting to R$ 123,228 that could be recognized in the future, in accordance with reviews of the annual projections of taxable income. 

 

F - 28


 
 

Table of Contents

 

The subsidiaries CPFL Renováveis and Sul Geradora have income tax and social contribution assets on tax loss carryforwards of R$ 61,951 and R$ 72,519, respectively, that were not recognized as it could not be reliable estimated whether future taxable profit will be available against which they can be utilized. There is no prescriptive period for use of the tax loss carryforwards.

 

( 9 )  LEASES  

 

The subsidiary CPFL Serviços provides services and leases equipment relating to power self-produced, in which it is the lessor, and the main risks and rewards of ownership of the assets are transferred to the lessees.

The essence is to lease equipment of own power production in order to attend the customers who require higher consumption of electricity at peak hours (when tariffs are higher). In addition, the company offers maintenance and operation services.

The subsidiary constructs the power generation plant at the customer’s place. Since the equipment is operating, the customer makes monthly fixed payments.

These investments are recorded at present value of the minimum lease payments receivable. These payments received are recorded as amortization of the minimum lease payments and the financial revenue is recorded in the profit or loss in accordance with the effective interest rate during the lease term.

The investments produced financial income during 2012 were R$ 12,031 (R$5,625 in 2011 and R$5,363 in 2010).

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

       

Gross investment

93,541

 

101,153

       

Financial income unrealized

(52,098)

 

(72,051)

       

Present value of minimum lease payments receivable

41,443

 

29,102

       
               

Current

9,740

 

4,581

       

Noncurrent

31,703

 

24,521

       
               
 

Within 1 year

 

1 to 5 years

 

Over 5 years

 

Total

Gross investment

13,151

 

45,114

 

35,276

 

93,541

Present value of minimum lease payments receivable

9,740

 

20,603

 

11,100

 

41,443

 

At December 31, 2012, there are no (i) unsecured residual amounts that benefit the lessor; (ii) provisions for uncollectible minimum lease payments receivable; or (iii) contingent payments recognized as revenue during the period.

 

( 10 )  FINANCIAL ASSET OF CONCESSION

 

 

F - 29


 
 

Table of Contents

 

At December 31, 2009

674,029

Additions

179,501

Adjustment to expected cash flow

82,636

Disposal

(1,520)

At December 31, 2010

934,646

Additions

381,027

Adjustment to expected cash flow

63,212

Disposal

(2,221)

At December 31, 2011

1,376,664

Additions

555,101

Effect of changing in amortization rates

294,785

Adjustment to expected cash flow

159,195

Disposal

(10,211)

Compensation SHP Rio do Peixe II (note 37.3)

1,706

At December 31, 2012

2,377,240

Current

34,444

Non current

2,342,796

 

The balance refers to the fair value of the financial asset in relation to the right established in the concession agreements of the energy distributors to receive payment on reversal of the assets to the granting authority at the end of the concession.

In 2012, as mentioned in note 13, ANEEL revised the amortization rates for electrical sector assets. The new rates are effective from January 1, 2012 and on average, increased the useful life of the electric energy distribution assets. Management is of the opinion that this fact changed the contractual conditions of the concession related to the way in which the Company is remunerated for its investments in the infrastructure tied to the service provision.

Therefore based on the amortization rates stipulated by the regulatory body, the Company recalculated its financial asset at January 1, 2012, corresponding to the new amount receivable on reversal of the assets at the end of the concession, which will be recovered directly from the granting authority. Consequently, the amount of R$ 294,785 was recorded as an increment of the financial asset.

In accordance with the current tariff model, remuneration for this asset is recognized in profit or loss on billing to the consumers and it is realized on receipt of the electric energy bills. Additionally, the difference to adjust the balance to its expected cash flows is recorded against the financial income account in profit or loss for the year, in accordance with the new replacement amount (BRR methodology).

The current assets balance relates to the compensation of Usina Rio do Peixe II’s (a generation concession) which was still recorded in our subsidiary CPFL Leste Paulista,  as this generation concession has not yet been transferred to a non-distribution subsidiary. (note 37).

 

Disposals in 2012 include the amount of R$ 5,947 related to disposals resulting from physical inventories carried out due to implementation of the Electrical Sector Equity Control - MCPSE (Resolution n° 367 of June 2, 2009), by the subsidiaries CPFL Piratininga, CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Jaguari, CPFL Leste Paulista, CPFL Sul Paulista and CPFL Mococa, recognized in Other Financial Expense (note 13).

 

( 11 )  OTHER CREDITS

 

 

F - 30


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

Current

Noncurrent

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

Advances - Fundação CESP

7,784

 

15,518

 

-

 

-

Advances to suppliers

17,995

 

37,951

 

-

 

-

Pledges, funds and tied deposits

53,585

 

1,548

 

263,386

 

115,517

Fund tied to foreign currency loans

-

 

-

 

34,287

 

29,774

Orders in progress

223,895

 

156,524

 

-

 

-

Outside services

8,214

 

10,962

 

-

 

-

Advance to energy purchase agreements

47,832

 

44,399

 

40,254

 

58,620

Collection agreements

65,214

 

57,377

 

-

 

-

Prepaid expenses

35,073

 

5,695

 

3,132

 

1,355

Receivables - Business combination

-

 

-

 

13,950

 

13,950

Advances to employees

6,879

 

4,751

 

-

 

-

Other

50,434

 

75,213

 

65,145

 

60,245

Total

516,903

 

409,938

 

420,155

 

279,460

 

Pledges, Funds and Tied Deposits: collateral offered to guarantee CCEE operations and short-term cash investments required by the subsidiaries’ loans contracts.

Fund Tied to Foreign Currency Loans: These are guarantees offered when negotiating or renegotiating loans.

Orders in Progress: Encompasses costs and revenue related to ongoing decommissioning or disposal of intangible assets and the service costs related to expenditure on projects in progress under the Energy Efficiency and Research and Development programs, introduced by resolutions 300/2008 and 316/2008 and amended by resolution 504/2012 . On termination of the respective projects, balances are amortized against the respective liability recorded in Other Accounts Payable (note 22).

Advance Energy Purchase Agreements: Refers to prepayments of energy purchases by the subsidiaries, which will be liquidated on delivery of the energy to be supplied.

Collection agreements: Refers to (i) agreements between the distributors and city halls and companies for collection  through the electric energy bills and subsequent pass-through  of amounts related to public lighting, newspapers, healthcare, residential insurance, etc.; e (ii) receipts by  CPFL Total, to be passed on subsequently to the customers who use the collection services provided by that subsidiary

At December 31, 2012, the Other Credits balance is net of the allowance for doubtful accounts of R$ 21,905 related to the accounts of Outside Services, Collection agreements and Others.

 

 

F - 31


 
 

Table of Contents

 

( 12 )  PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

 

 

Land

 

Reservoirs, dams and water mains

 

Buildings, construction and improvements

 

Machinery and equipment

 

Vehicles

 

Furniture and fittings

 

In progress

 

Total

At December 31, 2009

53,346

 

949,598

 

1,265,088

 

1,633,723

 

2,038

 

5,792

 

1,303,454

 

5,213,039

Historic cost

54,541

 

1,192,883

 

1,537,339

 

2,298,439

 

4,927

 

8,174

 

1,303,454

 

6,399,757

Accumulated depreciation

(1,195)

 

(243,285)

 

(272,251)

 

(664,715)

 

(2,889)

 

(2,382)

 

-

 

(1,186,717)

                               

Additions

-

 

3,851

 

3,471

 

(13,181)

 

1,457

 

2,044

 

754,298

 

751,940

Disposals

(48)

 

-

 

-

 

(15,508)

 

(355)

 

(37)

 

(417)

 

(16,365)

Transfers

128,279

 

617,401

 

133,578

 

385,307

 

1,859

 

6,261

 

(1,272,685)

 

-

Depreciation

(1,195)

 

(37,154)

 

(47,255)

 

(74,123)

 

(1,304)

 

(1,120)

 

-

 

(162,151)

                               

At December 31, 2010

180,382

 

1,533,696

 

1,354,882

 

1,916,219

 

3,695

 

12,940

 

784,650

 

5,786,465

Historic cost

182,772

 

1,814,135

 

1,674,388

 

2,655,057

 

7,888

 

16,442

 

784,650

 

7,135,333

Accumulated depreciation

(2,390)

 

(280,439)

 

(319,506)

 

(738,838)

 

(4,193)

 

(3,502)

 

-

 

(1,348,868)

                               

Additions

2,214

 

3,712

 

19,892

 

7,333

 

705

 

382

 

802,376

 

836,614

Disposals

(247)

 

(200)

 

(640)

 

(8,023)

 

(341)

 

(173)

 

(174)

 

(9,799)

Transfers

8,837

 

109,030

 

33,497

 

394,508

 

374

 

3,667

 

(549,914)

 

-

Transfers - other assets

-

 

-

 

-

 

10,341

 

-

 

-

 

(17,525)

 

(7,184)

Depreciation

(1,513)

 

(68,346)

 

(65,628)

 

(96,051)

 

(1,092)

 

(1,980)

 

-

 

(234,610)

Business combination

57,180

 

-

 

973,636

 

831,749

 

165

 

949

 

45,938

 

1,909,617

Other

-

 

-

 

510

 

10,195

 

3

 

-

 

265

 

10,973

                               

At December 31, 2011

246,853

 

1,577,892

 

2,316,149

 

3,066,271

 

3,509

 

15,785

 

1,065,615

 

8,292,076

Historic cost

250,757

 

1,926,694

 

2,757,021

 

4,006,964

 

8,799

 

21,657

 

1,065,615

 

10,037,508

Accumulated depreciation

(3,903)

 

(348,802)

 

(440,873)

 

(940,692)

 

(5,290)

 

(5,873)

 

-

 

(1,745,431)

                               

Additions

1,185

 

21,105

 

18,648

 

62,144

 

315

 

257

 

991,362

 

1,095,015

Disposals

(1,192)

 

(2,104)

 

(4,002)

 

(6,020)

 

(856)

 

(371)

 

(85)

 

(14,630)

Reversal of provision to environmental costs

-  

 

(66,763)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(66,763)

Transfers

(25,781)

 

744,891

 

(565,929)

 

1,258,613

 

3,061

 

3,627

 

(1,418,483)

 

-

Transfers - other assets

-

 

-

 

-

 

3,939

 

-

 

-

 

(42)

 

3,897

Reclassification of cost

-

 

217,435

 

(333,674)

 

115,355

 

14

 

870

 

-

 

-

Depreciation

(13,642)

 

(65,300)

 

(81,466)

 

(233,127)

 

(1,296)

 

(2,633)

 

-

 

(397,464)

Disposal of depreciation

-

 

1,013

 

157

 

2,586

 

696

 

282

 

-

 

4,733

Reclassification of accumulated depreciation

-

 

(71,606)

 

92,615

 

(20,970)

 

10

 

(50)

 

-

 

-

Business combination

-

 

-

 

65,470

 

606,620

 

-

 

(2)

 

23,006

 

695,093

                               

At December 31, 2012

207,424

 

2,356,563

 

1,507,967

 

4,855,413

 

5,454

 

17,764

 

661,372

 

9,611,958

Historic cost

224,969

 

2,888,854

 

1,899,068

 

6,124,821

 

11,322

 

26,300

 

661,372

 

11,836,706

Accumulated depreciation

(17,545)

 

(532,291)

 

(391,100)

 

(1,269,408)

 

(5,868)

 

(8,536)

 

-

 

(2,224,748)

                               

Average depreciation rate

3.86%

 

2.83%

 

2.99%

 

4.15%

 

16.16%

 

6.50%

       

 

 

F - 32


 
 

Table of Contents

 

On February 4, 2012, with Resolution 474, ANEEL established new annual depreciation rates for the operational assets granted in the electricity sector. The new rates substitute those of the Electricity Sector PP&E Control Manual – MCPSE and came into effect on January 1, 2012. This resulted in a reduction in the useful life of the generation assets, and in accordance with IAS 8, the Company changed the depreciation of property, plant and equipment prospectively as from that date, resulting in an incremental depreciation expense in the period of R$37,508.

In the financial statements, the figure for construction in progress refers mainly to works in progress of the operating subsidiaries and/or those under development, in particular, the projects of CPFL Renováveis, which has construction in progress of R$ 585,297.

 

In the business combination line item are included the amounts related to the assets acquired through the business combination of Atlântica Complex, Bons Ventos and SPE Lacenas by the indirectly controlled entity CPFL Renováveis, in 2012 (note 13).

 

In accordance with IAS 23, the interest on loans and financing taken out by the subsidiaries to finance the construction is capitalized during the construction phase. During 2012, R$ 32,527 was capitalized in the financial statements (R$ 6,861 in 2011 and R$ 84,839 in 2010). For further details on interest capitalized see note 28.

 

As a result of reconciliation of the assets base for implementation of the PP&E Control Manual, determined by ANEEL Resolution nº 367/2009, certain assets were reclassified, as shown under transfers and reclassification of cost and depreciation. 

As a consequence of the procedure of reviewing and updating provisions, the indirect subsidiary CPFL Renováveis revised its estimates of environmental expenditure and, as a result, reversed the provision of R$66,773, against property, plant and equipment, where it had originally been recorded.

In income statement, the depreciation is recognized under “Depreciation and amortization” (note 27).

 

At December 31, 2012, no assets of a significant amount had been pledged in guarantee, except as mentioned in note 15.

Impairment testing: For all the reporting periods the Company evaluates whether there are indicators of impairment of its assets that would require an impairment test. The evaluaton was based on external and internal information sources, taking into account variations in interest rates, changes in market conditions and other factors.

The result of the assessment indicated no signs of impairment of these assets in any of the reporting periods and therefore no impairment losses were recognized.

 

( 13 )  INTANGIBLE ASSETS

 

 

F - 33


 
 

Table of Contents

 

   

Concession rights

   

Goodwill

 

Acquired in business combinations

 

Distribution infrastructure - operational

 

Distribution infrastructure - in progress

 

Public utility

 

Other intangible assets

 

Total

At December 31, 2009

 

4,048

 

2,185,780

 

2,879,341

 

521,147

 

392,221

 

80,564

 

6,063,101

                             

Additions

 

2,007

 

38,286

 

5,133

 

1,159,601

 

11,395

 

41,146

 

1,257,568

Amortization

 

-

 

(182,615)

 

(351,690)

 

-

 

(5,633)

 

(12,878)

 

(552,816)

Transfer - intangible assets

 

-

 

-

 

806,904

 

(806,904)

 

-

 

-

 

-

Transfer - financial asset

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(179,501)

 

-

 

-

 

(179,501)

Transfer - other assets

 

-

 

681

 

(3,919)

 

-

 

-

 

(237)

 

(3,475)

Other

 

60

 

(188)

 

6

 

(204)

 

1

 

322

 

(3)

At December 31, 2010

 

6,115

 

2,041,944

 

3,335,775

 

694,139

 

397,984

 

108,917

 

6,584,874

Historic cost

 

6,152

 

3,741,285

 

8,336,914

 

694,139

 

407,286

 

162,877

 

13,348,653

Accumulated amortization

 

(37)

 

(1,699,341)

 

(5,001,139)

 

-

 

(9,302)

 

(53,960)

 

(6,763,779)

                             

Additions

 

-

 

-

 

3,259

 

1,094,929

 

-

 

8,673

 

1,106,861

Amortization

 

-

 

(196,513)

 

(389,740)

 

-

 

(15,413)

 

(17,279)

 

(618,945)

Transfer - intangible assets

 

-

 

(27,164)

 

636,009

 

(621,500)

 

-

 

12,655

 

-

Transfer - financial asset

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(381,027)

 

-

 

-

 

(381,027)

Transfer - other assets

 

-

 

-

 

(895)

 

(55,734)

 

-

 

(10,341)

 

(66,971)

Business combination

 

-

 

2,302,122

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

2,302,122

Other

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

526

 

526

At December 31, 2011

 

6,115

 

4,120,388

 

3,584,408

 

730,807

 

382,570

 

103,150

 

8,927,439

Historic cost

 

6,152

 

6,016,243

 

8,975,287

 

730,807

 

407,286

 

174,390

 

16,310,165

Accumulated amortization

 

(37)

 

(1,895,854)

 

(5,390,879)

 

-

 

(24,716)

 

(71,239)

 

(7,382,725)

                             

Additions

 

-

 

792,320

 

-

 

1,418,637

 

-

 

30,072

 

2,241,030

Amortization

 

-

 

(286,008)

 

(390,133)

 

-

 

(32,752)

 

(23,967)

 

(732,859)

Transfer - intangible assets

 

-

 

-

 

961,030

 

(961,030)

 

-

 

-

 

-

Transfer - financial asset

 

-

 

-

 

(294,785)

 

(555,101)

 

-

 

-

 

(849,886)

Transfer - other assets

 

-

 

-

 

(42,385)

 

-

 

-

 

(6,272)

 

(48,657)

Compensation SHP Rio do Peixe II (note 37.3)

-

 

-

 

(1,706)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(1,706)

At December 31, 2012

 

6,115

 

4,626,701

 

3,816,428

 

633,313

 

349,818

 

102,984

 

9,535,360

Historic cost

 

6,152

 

6,836,961

 

9,183,730

 

633,313

 

383,671

 

189,715

 

17,233,542

Accumulated amortization

 

(37)

 

(2,210,260)

 

(5,367,301)

 

-

 

(33,854)

 

(86,731)

 

(7,698,182)

 

At December 31, 2102, from the total intangible assets acquired through business combinations, R$ 792,321 relate to CPFL Renováveis, due to acquisition of indirect subsidiary Atlântica Complex, Bons Ventos and Lacenas (note 13).

 

On February 4, 2012, with Resolution 474, ANEEL established new annual depreciation rates for the operational assets granted in the electricity sector. As a result of the adjustment of the useful lives of the electric energy distribution assets, amortization of the distributors’ intangible concession asset changed from January 1, 2012.  In addition to the effects mentioned in note 10 with regard to transfer from intangible asset to financial asset, this resulted in an average increase in the useful life of these distribution assets.  Consequently, and in accordance  with IAS 8, the Company changed the amortization of the intangible asset prospectively as from that date, resulting in an estimated reduction in amortization expense in 2012 of R$ 59,313.

 

As a result of the implementation of the Electricity Sector PP&E Control Manual – MCPSE, (Resolution n° 367 of June 2, 2009), subsidiaries  CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga, CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Jaguari, CPFL Leste Paulista, CPFL Sul Paulista, CPFL Mococa and RGE carried out physical inventories which resulted in write-offs of assets amounting R$ 44,203 recorded as Other Operating Expense. The write-offs relating to the respective financial assets are described in note 10.

 

In the Statement of Income the amortization of intangibles is recorded under the following headings: (i) “depreciation and amortization” for the amortization of the intangible assets related to Distribution Infrastructure, Public Utilities and Other Intangible Assets; and (ii) “amortization of intangible concession asset” for amortization of the intangible asset acquired through business combination (note 27).

 

In accordance with IAS 23, the interest on loans taken out by the subsidiaries is capitalized to qualifying intangible assets. In the financial statements, R$ 15,645 was capitalized for 2012 (R$32,281 in 2011 and R$48,099 in 2010) at a rate of 8.23% p.a. (9.95% p.a. in 2011 and 7.9% p.a. in 2010).

 

F - 34


 
 

Table of Contents

 

13.1 Intangible asset acquired in business combinations

The following table shows the breakdown of the intangible asset of exploitation rights of the concession acquired in business combinations

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

Annual amortization rate

 

Historic cost

 

Accumulated amortization

  

Net value

 

Net value

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

Intangible asset - acquired in business combinations

                       

Intangible asset acquired, not merged

                         

Parent company

                         

CPFL Paulista

304,861

 

(138,556)

 

166,305

 

184,743

 

6.05%

 

6.33%

 

6.53%

CPFL Piratininga

39,065

 

(16,979)

 

22,086

 

24,264

 

5.58%

 

5.99%

 

6.19%

RGE

3,150

 

(1,022)

 

2,128

 

2,345

 

6.90%

 

6.81%

 

6.53%

CPFL Geração

54,555

 

(23,761)

 

30,793

 

33,659

 

5.28%

 

5.63%

 

5.80%

CPFL Santa Cruz

9

 

(5)

 

5

 

6

 

16.25%

 

21.17%

 

14.10%

CPFL Leste Paulista

3,333

 

(1,660)

 

1,673

 

2,212

 

16.16%

 

20.30%

 

13.39%

CPFL Sul Paulista

7,288

 

(3,620)

 

3,668

 

4,973

 

17.90%

 

18.98%

 

12.79%

CPFL Jaguari

5,213

 

(2,643)

 

2,570

 

3,320

 

14.40%

 

22.68%

 

13.62%

CPFL Mococa

9,110

 

(4,745)

 

4,365

 

6,031

 

18.29%

 

19.87%

 

13.92%

CPFL Jaguari Geração

7,896

 

(1,722)

 

6,174

 

6,777

 

7.64%

 

8.17%

 

6.00%

 

434,480

 

(194,714)

 

239,766

 

268,331

           
                           

Subsidiaries

                         

ENERCAN

10,233

 

(3,665)

 

6,568

 

7,210

 

6.27%

 

6.90%

 

6.93%

Barra Grande

3,081

 

(1,365)

 

1,715

 

1,884

 

5.49%

 

5.98%

 

5.93%

Chapecoense

7,376

 

(760)

 

6,615

 

7,075

 

6.06%

 

4.08%

 

-

EPASA

499

 

(43)

 

456

 

479

 

4.76%

 

3.85%

 

-

CPFL Renováveis

3,139,299

 

(158,176)

 

2,981,123

 

2,299,807

 

3.10%

 

3.82%

 

-

Outros

14,478

 

(12,673)

 

1,805

 

2,527

 

4.99%

 

4.99%

 

6.22%

 

3,174,965

 

(176,683)

 

2,998,282

 

2,318,983

           
                           

Subtotal

3,609,445

 

(371,397)

 

3,238,048

 

2,587,314

           
                           

Intangible asset acquired and merged – Deductible

                       

Subsidiaries

                         

RGE

1,120,266

 

(777,818)

 

342,449

 

361,908

 

1.74%

 

1.68%

 

1.69%

CPFL Geração

426,450

 

(255,157)

 

171,292

 

188,367

 

4.00%

 

4.25%

 

3.92%

Subtotal

1,546,716

 

(1,032,975)

 

513,741

 

550,274

           
                           

Intangible asset acquired and merged – Reassessed

                       

Parent company

                         

CPFL Paulista

1,074,026

 

(536,189)

 

537,838

 

596,709

 

5.48%

 

5.75%

 

5.93%

CPFL Piratininga

115,762

 

(50,313)

 

65,448

 

71,903

 

5.58%

 

5.99%

 

6.19%

RGE

310,128

 

(107,890)

 

202,237

 

222,894

 

6.69%

 

6.58%

 

6.30%

CPFL Santa Cruz

61,685

 

(43,187)

 

18,498

 

24,698

 

10.05%

 

13.10%

 

13.07%

CPFL Leste Paulista

27,034

 

(16,506)

 

10,528

 

14,289

 

13.91%

 

15.59%

 

15.46%

CPFL Sul Paulista

38,168

 

(23,153)

 

15,015

 

20,557

 

14.52%

 

15.16%

 

15.17%

CPFL Mococa

15,124

 

(9,488)

 

5,636

 

7,838

 

14.56%

 

15.34%

 

15.87%

CPFL Jaguari

23,600

 

(14,418)

 

9,182

 

12,354

 

13.44%

 

16.72%

 

15.75%

CPFL Jaguari Geração

15,275

 

(4,745)

 

10,530

 

11,559

 

6.73%

 

7.20%

 

7.94%

Outros

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

           

Subtotal

1,680,801

 

(805,889)

 

874,912

 

982,800

           
                           

Total

6,836,961

 

(2,210,260)

 

4,626,701

 

4,120,388

           

 

The intangible asset acquired in business combinations associated to the right to operate the concessions comprises:

- Intangible asset acquired, not merged

  Relates basically to the intangible asset of acquisition of the shares held by non-controlling interests prior to adoption of IFRS 3.

For the balances relating to the subsidiary CPFL Renováveis, amortization is recorded for the remaining terms of the respective exploration authorizations, using the straight line method. For the other balances, the amortization rates for intangible assets acquired through business combination are based on the projected income curves of the concessionaires for the remainder of the concession term, and these projections are reviewed annually.

 

- Intangible asset acquired and merged - Deductible

Intangible asset on the acquisition of the subsidiaries that was merged with the respective net equities, without application of CVM Instructions nº 319/99 and nº 349/01, that is, without segregation of the amount of the tax benefit.

- Intangible asset acquired and merged – Reassessed

 

F - 35


 
 

Table of Contents

 

In order to comply with ANEEL instructions and avoid the intangible asset amortization resulting from the merger of a parent company causing a negative impact on dividends paid to the noncontrolling shareholders, the subsidiaries applied the concepts of CVM Instructions nº 319/99 and nº 349/01 to the intangible acquisition asset. A reserve was therefore recorded to adjust the goodwill, set against the special equity reserves for goodwill on the merger of each subsidiary, so that the effect on the equity reflects the tax benefit of the merged intangible asset. These changes affected the Company's investment in the subsidiaries, and in order to adjust this, a non-deductible intangible asset was recorded for tax purposes.

 

13.2 Impairment test

For all the reporting periods the Company evaluates whether there are indicators of impairment of its assets that would require an impairment test. The evaluation was based on external and internal information sources, taking into account variations in interest rates, changes in market conditions, the profitability of its operations and other factors.

The result of the assessment indicated no signs of impairment of these assets in any of the reporting periods and there is no impairment loss to be recognized.

 

13.3 – Business combinations 2011 – CPFL Renováveis

In April 2011, with the objective of consolidating experience in the renewable energy sector and increasing synergies, the Company signed an agreement with the shareholders of ERSA Energia Renováveis S.A (“ERSA”) to merge renewable energy assets and projects held in its subsidiaries (in the case of CPFL, assets of the subsidiaries CPFL Geração and CPFL Brasil). After a series of planned restructurings, fully detailed in Financial Statements for the year ended on December 31, 2011, CPFL Geração and CPFL Brasil have joined the shareholders of ERSA as majority shareholders, resulting in the creation of CPFL Energias Renováveis S.A.

 

In 2011, the indirect subsidiary CPFL Renováveis acquired the following companies: (i) Jantus SL (“Jantus”), which held 100% of the capital of SIIF Energias do Brasil Ltda. (“SIIF”) and SIIF Desenvolvimento de Projeto de Energia Eólica Ltda. (“SIIF Desenvolvimento”), with a total of four wind power plants operating in the State of Ceará; and (ii) Santa Luzia Energética S.A. (“Santa Luzia”), which had an operational SHP in the State of Santa Catarina.

 

According the shareholders’ agreement of CPFL Renováveis, in the event the indirect subsidiary fails to go public in an initial public offering (IPO) within 2 years of the date of signing of the agreement, up to August 24, 2013, all of the non-controlling shareholders of CPFL Renováveis, individually, are entitled to sell their shares to CPFL Energia or to any third party(ies) nominated by CPFL Energia, and CPFL Energia has the obligation  to buy them, paying in cash, shares issued by CPFL Energia or a combination of cash and shares.  

 

13.4 - Business combinations – 2012

 

With the objective of further  consolidating experience and position in the renewable energy sector and increasing synergies , the Company has made the followings business combinations during 2012.

 

Atlântica Complex

 

In January 2012, the indirect subsidiary CPFL Renováveis signed a share purchase agreement with Cobra Instalaciones Y Servicios S.A., with the objective of acquiring 100% of the shares in Atlântica I Parque Eólico S.A., Atlântica II Parque Eólico S.A., Atlântica IV Parque Eólico S.A. and Atlântica V Parque Eólico S.A.. These companies hold authorizations to generate electric energy from wind power under the Independent Producer System, for a period of 35 years, by installation of their respective wind power plants, with joint installed power of 120 MW.

 

ANEEL has approved transfer of the control of the Atlântica Complex to CPFL Renováveis, as published on March 26, 2012. The amount of R$ 24,528 was paid to the sellers in March 2012.

 

 

Bons Ventos Geradora de Energia S.A (“BVP”)

 

 

F - 36


 
 

Table of Contents

 

According to an Announcement to the Market, published on June 19, 2012, the indirect subsidiary CPFL Renováveis acquired on February 24, 2012, the total capital stock of BVP S.A., the controlling shareholder of Bons Ventos Geradora de Energia S.A. (“Bons Ventos”). The total price of the acquisition was R$ 1,095,291, involving: (i) the payment to the sellers of the amount of R$ 528,552; (ii) the assumption of net debt in the amount of R$ 439,191; and (iii) R$ 127,548 for settlement of debentures issued by Bons Ventos Geradora de Energia S.A.

 

Bons Ventos has an authorization granted by ANEEL to exploit the Taíba Albatroz, Bons Ventos, Enacel and Canoa Quebrada wind power plants, with installed capacity of 157,5 MW. These wind power plants are located in the State of Ceará and are in full commercial operation. All the energy has been contracted to Eletrobrás for twenty years, under the PROINFA Program (Programa de Incentivo às Fontes Alternativas de Energia Elétrica).

As per the Material Fact published on June 19, 2012, ANEEL has approved transfer of the control of BVP to the CPFL Renováveis.

 

Usina Ester (SPE Lacenas)

In March 2012, the subsidiary CPFL Renováveis acquired 100% of the biomass electric energy and steam generation assets of SPE Lacenas Participações Ltda., a subsidiary of Usina Açucareira Ester (“Usina Ester”). Around 7 MW average of co-generation energy from Usina Ester were commercialized in the 2007 alternative sources auction (LFA), for a period of 15 years and at an average selling price of R$ 177 per MWh (as at January 2012). The remaining 2.8 MW of energy will be sold on the free market.

The transfer of control of SPE Lacenas to the subsidiary was conditional upon approval from ANEEL, which was obtained and the acquisition was concluded on October 18, 2012.

The total acquisition price of the assets after the adjustments provided for in the contract R$ 111,500, comprising: (i) R$ 55,244 paid by the buyer to the sellers; and (ii) assumption of a net debt of R$ 56,256 shown in the balance sheet of the acquired company.

 

 

a)   Additional information on the acquisition of the subsidiaries Atlântica Complex, BVP and Lacenas:.

   

Atlântica Complex

 

BVP

 

Lacenas

   

March
26, 2012

 

June 19, 2012

 

October 18, 2012

             

Cash and cash equivalents transferred as consideration by the acquirer:

           

Cash transferred or to be transferred to sellers

 

24,000

 

445,124

 

53,836

Accounts payable to shareholders

 

-

 

-

 

1,408

Cash tranferred directly to BVP to debt payment and sellers expenses

 

-

 

127,548

 

-

Price adjustment paid to sellers according to contractual obligations

 

528

 

83,428

 

-

Total transferred consideration (paid)

 

24,528

 

656,100

 

55,244

  

b)   Assets acquired and liabilities recognized on the acquisition date:

The total consideration transferred (paid) for the acquisitions was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their fair values, including the intangible assets associated to the authorized exploration rights, and will be amortized over the remaining terms of the authorizations linked to exploration of the ventures purchased. Consequently, as the whole amount paid was allocated to identified assets and liabilities, no residual amount was allocated to goodwill for these transactions.

The initial accounting for the acquisition of the Atlântica Complex on February 29, 2012 and Bons Ventos on 31 May, 2012 has been concluded. The accounting for the acquisition of Lacenas on September 30, 2012 was provisionally determined at December 31, 2012, as the assessment of the measurement of the intangible assets had not been finalized at the date of completion of these financial statements, and consequently, had only been provisionally calculated based on Management’s best estimate of these amounts.

F - 37


 
 

Table of Contents

 

The Management of CPFL Renováveis does not expect the amount allocated as exploration right to these acquisitions to be deductible for tax purposes on the acquisition date, and has therefore recorded deferred income tax and social contribution in relation to the difference between the amounts allocated and the tax bases of these assets and liabilities.

   

Atlântica Complex

 

BVP

 

Lacenas

   

March
26, 2012

 

June 19, 2012

 

October 18, 2012

Current assets:

           

Cash and cash equivalents

 

186

 

28,092

 

-

Receivables

 

-

 

16,232

 

-

Taxes recovarable and other credits

 

157

 

6,987

 

-

           

Noncurrent assets:

           

Pledges, funds and tied deposits

 

-

 

38,752

 

-

Deferred taxes

 

-

 

57,121

 

-

Other credits

 

-

 

10,000

 

-

Fixed assets

 

23,007

 

571,495

 

100,591

Intangible - exploration rights

 

1,873

 

760,029

 

17,862

           

Liabilities:

           

Suppliers

 

54

 

14,430

 

-

Loans and debentures

 

-

 

39,324

 

7,418

Tax, consumers prepayment and other liabilities

 

5

 

22,727

 

880

           

Noncurrent liabilities:

           

Loans and debentures

 

-

 

461,126

 

48,838

Suppliers

 

-

 

5,818

 

-

Deferred taxes

 

-

 

16,629

 

-

Deferred taxes on the exploration rights

 

637

 

258,410

 

6,073

Reserve for disposal of assets and environmental liabilities

 

-

 

14,144

 

-

Acquired net assets

 

24,528

 

656,100

 

55,244

 

The exploration rights will be amortized over the remaining term of the authorizations to exploit the ventures, over an estimated average term of 23 years for the Atlântica Complex, 21 years for Bons Ventos and 20 years for Lacenas.

 

c)   Net cash outflow on acquisition of the subsidiaries:

   

Atlântica Complex

 

BVP

   
       

Lacenas

 

March 26, 2012

 

June 19, 2012

 

October 18, 2012

Cash consideration

 

24,528

 

656,100

 

53,836

(-) Acquired cash and cash equivalents

 

(186)

 

(28,092)

 

-

Net cash of acquisition

 

24,342

 

628,008

 

53,836

 

d)   Impact of the acquisitions in 2012 on the profit and loss:

Financial information on the revenue and net income of the companies acquired included in the Company’s financial statements in the year of the acquisition:

 

F - 38


 
 

Table of Contents

 

   

Net operating revenue

Net Income

Atlântica

 

-

 

(2,803)

BVP

 

49,600

 

22,970

Lacenas

 

6,793

 

849

   

56,393

 

21,016

 

If the acquisitions had occurred in January 1, 2012, the net combined operating revenue of CPFL Energia would be R$ 15,123,905 and the net combined income for the year would be R$ 1,236,443.

The purchase of the Atlântica Complex was completed on March 26, 2012, with the opening balance as of February 29, 2012. Accordingly, the financial statements at December 31, 2012 include ten months of the operations of this indirectly controlled entity.

 

The purchase of Bons Ventos was completed on June 19, 2012, with the opening balance as of May 31, 2012. Accordingly, the financial statements at December 31, 2012 include seven months of the operations of this indirectly controlled entity.

 

The purchase of Lacenas was completed on October 18, 2012 and the opening balance was prepared as of September 30, 2012. Accordingly, the financial statements at December 31, 2012 include three months of the operations of this subsidiary.

 

The opening balances were taken at different dates from the acquisition dates for practical reasons and the differences are not significant.

 

 

( 14 )  SUPPLIERS 

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

Current

     

System Service Charges

138,973

 

33,794

Energy purchased

877,439

 

730,790

Electricity Network Usage Charges

171,651

 

150,013

Materials and Services

417,830

 

247,085

Free Energy

85,078

 

78,432

Other

30

 

30

Total

1,691,002

 

1,240,143

       

Noncurrent

     

Electricity Network Usage Charges

4,467

 

-

 

4,467

 

-

 

 

( 15 )  ACCRUED INTEREST ON LOANS AND FINANCING AND LOANS AND FINANCING

 

 

F - 39


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

   

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

   

Interest - Current and Noncurrent

 

Principal

 

Total

 

Interest - Current and Noncurrent

 

Principal

 

Total

     

Current

 

Noncurrent

     

Current

 

Noncurrent

 

Measured at cost

                               

Brazilian currency

                               

BNDES - Power increases

 

16

 

3,601

 

1,217

 

4,834

 

34

 

3,690

 

4,802

 

8,526

BNDES/BNB - Investment

 

27,229

 

776,770

 

5,186,526

 

5,990,524

 

25,262

 

551,737

 

4,213,425

 

4,790,423

BNDES - Purchase of assets

 

65

 

2,036

 

7,476

 

9,578

 

49

 

2,039

 

5,042

 

7,130

BNDES - Working capital

 

143

 

36,928

 

-

 

37,071

 

687

 

111,129

 

36,928

 

148,743

Financial Institutions

 

153,720

 

725,379

 

1,406,468

 

2,285,567

 

119,574

 

211,558

 

1,365,605

 

1,696,738

Other

 

784

 

11,616

 

23,638

 

36,039

 

782

 

13,154

 

28,327

 

42,263

Subtotal

 

181,957

 

1,556,329

 

6,625,326

 

8,363,612

 

146,388

 

893,307

 

5,654,129

 

6,693,824

                                 

Foreign currency

                               

Financial Institutions

 

452

 

2,170

 

44,423

 

47,045

 

444

 

3,107

 

42,769

 

46,320

                                 

Total at Cost

 

182,409

 

1,558,499

 

6,669,749

 

8,410,657

 

146,832

 

896,414

 

5,696,898

 

6,740,144

                                 

Measured at fair value

                               

Foreign currency

                               

Financial Institutions

 

22,460

 

-

 

2,365,786

 

2,388,245

 

18,697

 

-

 

1,685,557

 

1,704,254

                                 

Total at fair value

 

22,460

 

-

 

2,365,786

 

2,388,245

 

18,697

 

-

 

1,685,557

 

1,704,254

                                 

Total

 

204,869

 

1,558,499

 

9,035,534

 

10,798,902

 

165,530

 

896,414

 

7,382,455

 

8,444,398

 

 

F - 40


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Measured at amortized cost

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

Annual interest

 

Amortization

 

Collateral

Brazilian currency

                   

BNDES - Power increases

                   

CPFL Renováveis

 

4,834

 

8,526

 

TJLP + 3,1% to 4,3%

 

72 to 75 monthly installments from September 2007 to July 2008

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory note

                     

BNDES/BNB/FINEP/NIB - Investment

                   

CPFL Paulista - FINEM III

 

26,885

 

53,807

 

TJLP + 3,3%

 

72 monthly installments from January 2008

 

CPFL Energia guarantee, receivables and promissory note

CPFL Paulista - FINEM IV

 

128,200

 

192,429

 

TJLP + 3,28% to 3,4%

 

60 monthly installments from January 2010

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and receivables

CPFL Paulista - FINEM V

 

170,651

 

199,692

 

TJLP + 2,12% to 3,3%

 

72 monthly installments from February 2012

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and receivables

CPFL Paulista - FINEM V

 

71,522

 

64,873

 

Fixed rate 5,5% to 8,0%

 

114 monthly installments from August 2011

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and receivables

CPFL Paulista - FINEM VI

 

149,873

 

-

 

TJLP + 2,06%
a 3,08%

 

72 monthly installments from January 2014

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and receivables

CPFL Paulista - FINEM VI

 

190,349

 

-

 

Fixed rate 2,5%

 

114 monthly installments from June 2013

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and receivables

CPFL Paulista - FINAME

 

59,149

 

67,613

 

Fixed rate 4,5%

 

96 monthly installments from January 2012

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Piratininga - FINEM II

 

15,971

 

31,963

 

TJLP + 3,3%

 

72 monthly installments from January 2008

 

CPFL Energia guarantee, receivables and promissory note

CPFL Piratininga - FINEM III

 

53,434

 

80,207

 

TJLP + 3,28% to 3,4%

 

60 monthly installments from January 2010

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and receivables

CPFL Piratininga - FINEM V

 

55,166

 

-

 

TJLP + 2,06% to 3,08%

 

72 monthly installments from January 2014

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and receivables

CPFL Piratininga - FINEM V

 

29,591

 

-

 

Fixed rate 2,5%

 

114 monthly installments from June 2013

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and receivables

CPFL Piratininga - FINEM IV

 

91,622

 

109,734

 

TJLP + 2,12% to 3,3%

 

72 monthly installments from February 2012

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and receivables

CPFL Piratininga - FINEM IV

 

35,125

 

35,611

 

Fixed rate 5,5% to 8%

 

114 monthly installments from August 2011

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and receivables

CPFL Piratininga - FINAME

 

28,048

 

32,062

 

Fixed rate 4,5%

 

96 monthly installments from January 2012

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

RGE - FINEM III

 

-

 

22,429

 

TJLP + 5%

 

60 monthly installments from January 2008

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and receivables

RGE - FINEM IV

 

81,606

 

122,492

 

TJLP + 3,28 to 3,4%

 

60 monthly installments from January 2010

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and receivables

RGE - FINEM V

 

102,980

 

109,962

 

TJLP + 2,12 to 3,3%

 

72 monthly installments from February 2012

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and receivables

RGE - FINEM V

 

23,385

 

23,308

 

Fixed rate 5,5%

 

96 monthly installments from February 2013

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and receivables

RGE - FINEM VI

 

85,257

 

-

 

TJLP + 2,06 to 3,08%

 

72 monthly installments from January 2014

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and receivables

RGE - FINEM VI

 

51,671

 

-

 

Fixed rate 2,5%

 

114 monthly installments from June 2013

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and receivables

RGE - FINAME

 

14,074

 

16,089

 

Fixed rate 4,5%

 

96 monthly installments from January 2012

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

RGE - FINAME

 

404

 

-

 

Fixed rate 10,0%

 

90 monthly installments from May 2012

 

Equipment fiduciary alienation

CPFL Santa Cruz - FINAME e CCB

 

5,527

 

8,007

 

TJLP + 2,00% to 2,90%

 

59 monthly installments from December 2010

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and receivables

CPFL Santa Cruz - FINEM I

 

18,374

 

-

 

TJLP + 1,66% to 3,06%

 

28 monthly installments from January 2013

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Santa Cruz - FINEM I

 

4,330

 

-

 

TJLP + 1,66% to 3,06%

 

1 installment in April 2015

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Leste Paulista - CCB

 

4,090

 

5,497

 

TJLP + 2,9%

 

54 monthly installments from June 2011

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and receivables

CPFL Leste Paulista - FINEM I

 

8,881

 

-

 

TJLP + 1,66% to 3,06%

 

28 monthly installments from January 2013

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Leste Paulista - FINEM I

 

1,685

 

-

 

TJLP + 2,06% to 3,06%

 

1 installment in April 2015

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Sul Paulista - CCB

 

4,430

 

5,952

 

TJLP + 2,9%

 

54 monthly installments from June 2011

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and receivables

CPFL Sul Paulista - FINEM I

 

11,071

 

-

 

TJLP + 1,66% to 3,06%

 

28 monthly installments from January 2013

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Sul Paulista - FINEM I

 

1,242

 

-

 

TJLP + 2,06% to 3,06%

 

1 installment in April 2015

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Jaguari - CCB

 

2,639

 

3,732

 

TJLP + 2,9%

 

54 monthly installments from December 2010

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and receivables

CPFL Jaguari - CCB

 

2,138

 

-

 

TJLP + 3,1%

 

96 monthly installments from June 2014

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Jaguari - CCB

 

531

 

-

 

Basket of currencies + 2,1%

 

96 monthly installments from June 2014

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Mococa - CCB

 

3,040

 

4,258

 

TJLP + 2,9%

 

54 monthly installments from January 2011

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and receivables

CPFL Mococa - CCB

 

2,750

 

-

 

TJLP + 3,1%

 

96 monthly installments from June 2014

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Mococa - CCB

 

683

 

-

 

Basket of currencies + 2,1%

 

96 monthly installments from June 2014

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Serviços - FINAME

 

3,478

 

-

 

Fixed rate 2,5% to 10,0%

 

120 monthly installments from November 2012

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and equipment fiduciary alienation

CPFL Serviços - FINAME

 

101

 

-

 

TJLP + 4,2%

 

90 monthly installments from November 2012

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and equipment fiduciary alienation

BAESA

 

88,800

 

104,649

 

TJLP + 3,125% to 4,125%

 

144 monthly installments from September 2006

 

Pledge of shares, credit rights and revenue

BAESA

 

21,993

 

23,356

 

Basket of currencies + 3,125% (1)

 

144 monthly installments from November 2006

 

Pledge of shares, credit rights and revenue

ENERCAN

 

207,171

 

240,780

 

TJLP + 4%

 

144 monthly installments from April 2007

 

Letters of guarantee

ENERCAN

 

14,875

 

15,685

 

Basket of currencies + 4%

 

144 monthly installments from April 2007

 

Letters of guarantee

CERAN

 

458,569

 

508,179

 

TJLP + 3,69% to 5%

 

168 monthly installments from December 2005

 

Pledge of shares, credit and concession rights and revenue and CPFL Energia guarantee

CERAN

 

54,067

 

55,288

 

Basket of currencies + 5% (1)

 

168 monthly installments from February 2006

 

Pledge of shares, credit and concession rights and revenue and CPFL Energia guarantee

Foz do Chapecó

 

982,313

 

1,044,312

 

TJLP + 2,49% to 2,95%

 

192 monthly installments from october 2011

 

Pledge of shares, credit and concession rights and revenue and CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Renováveis - FINEM I

 

384,629

 

416,677

 

TJLP + 1,95%

 

168 monthly installments from october 2009 to July 2011

 

PCH Holding joint debtor letters of guarantee

CPFL Renovaveis - FINEM II

 

35,395

 

38,818

 

TJLP + 1,90%,

 

144 monthly installments from June 2011

 

CPFL Energia guarantee, fiduciary alienation of assets and joint fiduciary assignment of credit rights

CPFL Renováveis - FINEM III

 

616,796

 

291,454

 

TJLP + 1,72% to 1,9%

 

156 to 192 monthly installments from January 2012 to May 2013

 

CPFL Energia guarantee, plegde of shares, fiduciary alienation of assets and joint fiduciary assignment of credit rights

CPFL Renováveis - FINEM IV

 

-

 

5,374

 

TJLP + 3,5%

 

46 monthly installments from April 2011

 

CPFL Energia guarantee, pledge of receivables

CPFL Renováveis - FINEM V

 

124,508

 

136,002

 

TJLP + 2,8% to 3,4%

 

143 monthly installments from December 2011

 

PCH Holding 2 and CPFL Renewable debtor solidarity.

CPFL Renováveis - FINEM VI

 

71,741

 

-

 

TJLP + 2,05%

 

173 a 192 monthly installments from october 2013 e April 2015

 

CPFL Renováveis pledge of shares, pledge of receivables

CPFL Renováveis - FINEM VII

 

213,404

 

-

 

TJLP - 1,92 %

 

156 monthly installments from october 2010 a September 2023

 

Pledge of shares. Fiduciary alienation. Equipment fiduciary alienation

CPFL Renovaveis - FINEM VIII

 

39,024

 

-

 

TJLP + 2,02%

 

192 monthly installments from January 2014

 

Pledge of CPFL Renováveis shares
Pledge of shares and Reserve Account of SPE
Assignment of Receivables

CPFL Renovaveis - FINEM IX

 

54,413

 

-

 

TJLP + 2,15%

 

120 monthly installments from May 2010

 

In process of negotiation

CPFL Renovaveis - FINEM X

 

1,428

 

-

 

TJLP + 0%

 

84 monthly installments from october 2010

 

Pledge of shares. Fiduciary alienation. Equipment fiduciary alienation

CPFL Renovaveis - FINEM XI

 

149,558

 

127,727

 

TJLP + 1,72% to 1,9%

 

108 to 168 monthly installments from February 2012 to January 2013.

 

CPFL Energia guarantee, fiduciary alienation of assets and joint fiduciary assignment of credit rights

CPFL Renováveis - FINAME I

 

217,318

 

186,126

 

Fixed rate 5,5%

 

102 to 108 monthly installments from January 2012 to August 2020

 

CPFL Energia guarantee, fiduciary alienation of assets and fiduciary assignment of credit rights

CPFL Renováveis - FINAME II

 

36,662

 

37,356

 

Fixed rate 4,5%

 

102 monthly installments from June 2011

 

CPFL Energia guarantee, fiduciary alienation of assets and joint fiduciary assignment of credit rights

CPFL Renováveis - FINAME III

 

59,025

 

-

 

Fixed rate 2,5%

 

108 monthly installments from January 2014

 

Pledge of CPFL Renováveis shares
Pledge of shares and Reserve Account of SPE
Assignment of receivables

CPFL Renováveis - BNB

 

144,251

 

152,136

 

Fixed rate at 9,5% to 10% a.a.

 

168 monthly installments from January 2009

 

Fiduciary alienation

CPFL Renováveis - BNB

 

181,925

 

-

 

Fixed rate 10% a.a.

 

222 monthly installments from May 2010

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Renováveis - NIB

 

82,488

 

-

 

IGPM + 8,63% a.a.

 

1 installment in July 2012

 

No guarantee

Epasa - FINEM

 

96,694

 

102,782

 

TJLP + 1,82%

 

152 monthly installments from January 2012

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

Epasa - BNB

 

109,263

 

109,137

 

Fixed rate 10%

 

132 monthly installments from January 2013

 

CPFL Energia guarantee, receivables, pledge of concession rights and liquidity fund in a reserve account

CPFL Brasil - FINEP

 

4,260

 

4,868

 

Fixed rate 5%

 

81 monthly installments from August 2011

 

Receivables

 

 

 

 

F - 41


 
 

Table of Contents

 

BNDES - Other

                   

CPFL Brasil - Purchase of assets

 

-  

 

3,624

 

TJLP + 1,72% to 2,84%

 

88 monthly installments from January 2010

 

Fiduciary alienation of assets and CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Brasil - Purchase of assets

 

-  

 

3,508

 

Fixed rate de 4,5% to 8,7%

 

125 monthly installments from March 2012

 

Fiduciary alienation of assets and CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Serviços - Purchase of assets

 

4,316  

 

-

 

TJLP + 1,72% to 2,84%

 

88 monthly installments from January 2010

 

Fiduciary alienation of assets and CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Serviços - Purchase of assets

 

5,262  

 

-

 

Fixed rate 4,5% to 8,7%

 

125 monthly installments from March 2012

 

Fiduciary alienation of assets and CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Piratininga - Working capital

 

2,290

 

29,784

 

TJLP + 5% (2)

 

24 monthly installments from February 2011

 

No guarantee

CPFL Piratininga - Working capital

 

20,766

 

48,492

 

TJLP + 5%

 

24 monthly installments from october 2011

 

Promissory note

CPFL Geração - Working capital

 

14,015

 

42,077

 

TJLP + 4,95%

 

24 monthly installments from July 2011

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Geração - Working capital

 

-

 

28,389

 

TJLP + 4,95% (2)

 

23 monthly installments from February 2011

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

                     

Financial Institutions

                   

CPFL Paulista

                   

Banco do Brasil - Law 8727

 

16,984

 

26,589

 

IGP-M + 7,42%

 

240 monthly installments from May 1994

 

Receivables (CPFL Paulista and São Paulo Government)

Banco do Brasil - Working capital

 

104,612

 

105,435

 

107% of CDI

 

1 installment in April 2015

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

Banco do Brasil - Working capital (*)

 

182,385

 

224,124

 

98,5% of CDI

 

04 annual installments from July 2012

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

Banco do Brasil - Working capital (**)

 

174,749

 

160,528

 

99% of CDI

 

02 annual installments from March 2013

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Piratininga

                   

Banco do Brasil - Working capital (*)

 

16,774

 

20,613

 

98,5% of CDI

 

04 annual installments from July 2012

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

Banco do Brasil - Working capital (**)

 

22,573

 

20,671

 

99% of CDI

 

02 annual installments from March 2013

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

RGE

                   

Banco do Brasil - Working capital (*)

 

172,665

 

266,046

 

98,50% of CDI

 

04 annual installments from July 2012

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

Banco do Brasil - Working capital (**)

 

62,992

 

59,438

 

99% of CDI

 

02 annual installments from March 2013

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Santa Cruz

                   

Banco do Brasil - Working capital (*)

 

10,044

 

18,551

 

98,5% of CDI

 

02 annual installments from July 2012

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

Banco do Brasil - Working capital (**)

 

7,905

 

7,113

 

99% of CDI

 

02 annual installments from March 2013

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Leste Paulista

                   

Banco do Brasil - Working capital (*)

 

10,326

 

19,073

 

98,5% of CDI

 

02 annual installments from July 2012

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

Banco do Brasil - Working capital (**)

 

20,429

 

18,576

 

99% of CDI

 

02 annual installments from March 2013

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

Banco IBM - Working capital (***)

 

9,316

 

-

 

100% of CDI

 

14 semiannual installments from December 2012 e January 2013

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Sul Paulista

                   

Banco do Brasil - Working capital (*)

 

6,215

 

11,479

 

98,5% of CDI

 

02 annual installments from July 2012

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

Banco do Brasil - Working capital (**)

 

10,950

 

9,948

 

99% of CDI

 

02 annual installments from March 2013

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Jaguari

                   

Banco do Brasil - Working capital (*)

 

1,099

 

2,029

 

98,5% of CDI

 

02 annual installments from July 2012

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

Banco do Brasil - Working capital (**)

 

6,955

 

6,298

 

99% of CDI

 

02 annual installments from March 2013

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

Banco IBM - Working capital (***)

 

19,416

 

-

 

100% of CDI

 

14 semiannual installments from December 2012

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Mococa

                   

Banco do Brasil - Working capital (*)

 

5,210

 

9,623

 

98,5% of CDI

 

02 annual installments from July 2012

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

Banco do Brasil - Working capital (**)

 

3,471

 

3,114

 

99% of CDI

 

02 annual installments from March 2013

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

Banco IBM - Working capital (***)

 

6,320

 

-

 

100% of CDI

 

14 semiannual installments from December 2012

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Serviços

                   

Banco IBM - Working capital (***)

 

8,248

 

-

 

CDI + 0,10%

 

11 semiannual installments from June 2013

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Geração

                   

Banco do Brasil - Working capital

 

624,326

 

628,632

 

107% of CDI

 

1 installment in April 2015

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

Foz do Chapecó

                   

Banco Alfa

 

-

 

3,911

 

111,45% of CDI

 

1 installment in January 2012

 

No guarantee

CPFL Renováveis

                   

Banco Safra

 

52,542

 

74,947

 

CDI+ 0,4%

 

Annual installments unitl 2014

 

No guarantee

HSBC

 

397,523

 

-

 

CDI + 0,5%

 

8 annual installments from June 2013

 

Shares alienation

Banco do Brasil - Promissory Note

 

331,538

 

-

 

108,5% of CDI

 

1 installment in January 2013

 

No guarantee

                     

Other

                   

Eletrobrás

                   

CPFL Paulista

 

8,490

 

9,046

 

RGR + 6% to 6,5%

 

monthly installments from August 2006

 

Receivables and promissory notes

CPFL Piratininga

 

555

 

707

 

RGR + 6%

 

monthly installments from August 2006

 

Receivables and promissory notes

RGE

 

14,165

 

16,264

 

RGR + 6%

 

monthly installments from August 2006

 

Receivables and promissory notes

CPFL Santa Cruz

 

2,806

 

3,381

 

RGR + 6%

 

monthly installments from January 2007

 

Receivables and promissory notes

CPFL Leste Paulista

 

845

 

986

 

RGR + 6%

 

monthly installments from February 2008

 

Receivables and promissory notes

CPFL Sul Paulista

 

1,366

 

1,629

 

RGR + 6%

 

monthly installments from August 2007

 

Receivables and promissory notes

CPFL Jaguari

 

77

 

93

 

RGR + 6%

 

monthly installments from June 2007

 

Receivables and promissory notes

CPFL Mococa

 

334

 

383

 

RGR + 6%

 

monthly installments from January 2008

 

Receivables and promissory notes

Other

 

7,402

 

9,774

           

Subtotal Brazilian Currency - Cost

 

8,363,613

 

6,693,824

           

 

 

F - 42


 
 

Table of Contents

 

                     

Foreign Currency

                   

Financial institutions

                   

CPFL Paulista

                   

Debt Conversion Bond

 

-

 

1,119

 

US$ + Libor 6 months + 0,875%

 

17 semiannual installments from April 2004

 

Revenue/Government SP guaranteed

C-Bond (4)

 

3,310

 

5,064

 

US$ + 8% FIXED

 

21 semiannual installments from April 2004

 

Revenue/Government SP guaranteed

Discount Bond (4)

 

17,879

 

16,403

 

US$ + Libor 6 months + 0,8125%

 

1 installment in April 2024

 

Revenue/Government SP guaranteed

PAR-Bond (4)

 

25,856

 

23,734

 

US$ + 6% FIXED

 

1 installment in April 2024

 

Revenue/Government SP guaranteed

Subtotal Foreign Currency - Cost

 

47,045

 

46,320

           
                     

Total Measured at cost

 

8,410,657

 

6,740,144

           
                     

Foreign Currency

                   

Measured at fair value

                   

Financial Institutions

                   

CPFL Paulista

                   

BNP Paribas

 

215,534

 

195,602

 

US$
+ 2,78% (3)

 

1 installment in June 2014

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

J.P.Morgan

 

106,746

 

95,259

 

US$
+ 2,74% (3)

 

1 installment in July 2014

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

J.P.Morgan

 

106,156

 

94,364

 

US$
+ 2,55% (3)

 

1 installment in August 2014

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

Bank of America Merrill Lynch

 

317,501

 

282,012

 

US$
+ 2,33% (3)

 

1 installment in July 2014

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

Bank of America Merrill Lynch

 

226,077

 

196,645

 

US$
+ 3,69% (3)

 

1 installment in July 2016

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

Societe Generale

 

48,535

 

42,106

 

US$
+ 3,55% (3)

 

1 installment in August 2016

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

HSBC

 

50,654

 

44,782

 

US$
+ 2,37% (3)

 

1 installment in September 2014

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

Scotiabank

 

52,444

 

-

 

US$
+ 3,3125% (3)

 

1 installment in July 2016

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

Morgan Stanley

 

107,877

 

95,086

 

US$
+ Libor 6 months
+ 1,75% (3)

 

1 installment in September 2016

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

Citibank

 

107,952

 

95,165

 

US$
+ Libor 6 months
+ 1,77% (3)

 

1 installment in September 2016

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

CPFL Piratininga

                   

BNP Paribas

 

63,855

 

56,862

 

US$
+ 2,62% (3)

 

1 installment in July 2014

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

J.P.Morgan

 

212,169

 

188,538

 

US$
+ 2,52% (3)

 

1 installment in August 2014

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

Societe Generale

 

63,685

 

55,249

 

US$
+ 3,55% (3)

 

1 installment in August 2016

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

Scotiabank

 

68,498

 

-

 

US$
+ 3,3125% (3)

 

1 installment in July 2016

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

Citibank

 

17,233

 

15,190

 

US$
+ Libor 6 months
+ 1,69%(3)

 

1 installment in August 2016

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

Sumitomo Mitsui

 

107,703

 

94,845

 

US$
+ Libor 6 months
+ 1,75% (3) (****)

 

1 installment in August 2016

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

CPFL Geração

                   

Citibank

 

134,641

 

118,524

 

US$
+ Libor 6 months
+ 1,69% (3)

 

1 installment in August 2016

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

RGE

                   

J.P. Morgan

 

101,214

 

-

 

US$
+ 2,64% (3)

 

1 installment in July 2016

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

Citibank

 

148,853

 

-

 

US$
+ Libor 6 months
+ 1,45% (5)

 

1 installment in April 2017

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

CPFL Santa Cruz

                 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

J.P. Morgan

 

20,522

 

-

 

US$
+ 2,38% (3)

 

1 installment in July 2015

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

CPFL Leste Paulista

                   

Scotiabank

 

25,920

 

-

 

US$
+ 2,695% (3)

 

1 installment in July 2015

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

Citibank

 

9,962

 

8,972

 

US$
+ Libor 6 months
+ 1,52% (3)

 

1 installment in September 2014

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

CPFL Sul Paulista

                   

J.P. Morgan

 

10,775

 

-

 

US$
+ 2,38% (3)

 

1 installment in July 2015

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

Scotiabank  

 

10,912

 

-

 

US$
+ 2,695% (3)

 

1 installment in
July 2015

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

Citibank

 

9,985

 

8,972

 

US$
+ Libor 6 months
+ 1,52% (3)

 

1 installment in September 2014

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

CPFL Jaguari

                   

Scotiabank

 

13,510

 

-

 

US$
+ 2,695% (3)

 

1 installment in July 2015

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

Citibank

 

9,162

 

8,233

 

US$
+ Libor 6 months
+ 1,57% (3)

 

1 installment in August 2014

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

CPFL Mococa

                   

Scotiabank

 

11,432

 

-

 

US$
+ 2,695% (3)

 

1 installment in July 2015

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

Citibank

 

8,737

 

7,849

 

US$
+ Libor 6 months
+ 1,52%(3)

 

1 installment in September 2014

 

CPFL Energia guarantee and promissory notes

Total Foreign Currency - fair value

 

2,388,245

 

1,704,254

           
                     

Total - Consolidated

 

10,798,902

 

8,444,398

           
                     

The subsdiaries hold swaps converting the operating cost of currency variation to interest tax variation in reais, corresponding to :

(1) 176,2% of CDI

 

(3) 95,50% to 106,85% of CDI

       

(2) 106% to 106,5% of CDI

 

( 5 ) 108% of CDI

       

(4) As certain assets are dollar indexed, a partial swap of R$ 12,823 was contracted, converting the currency variation to 95,78% of the CDI.

(*) Efective tax
CPFL Paulista and CPFL Piratininga - 98,5% CDI + 2,88%
RGE - 98,5% of CDI + 2,5%a.a.
CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Sul Paulista, CPFL Leste Paulista, CPFL Mococa, CPFL Jaguari - 98,5% CDI + 2,28%

(**) Effective tax:
CPFL Paulista - 99,0% of CDI + 2,38% and CPFL Piratininga - 99,0% of CDI + 2,38%
RGE - 99,0% of CDI + 2,38%.
CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Sul Paulista, CPFL Leste Paulista, CPFL Mococa, CPFL Jaguari - 99,0% CDI + 2,38%

(***) Effective tax

           

CPFL Leste Paulista, CPFL Mococa and CPFL Jaguari - 100% CDI + 1,88%

CPFL Serviços - CDI + 0,10 % + 1,88%

(****) Effective tax

       

CPFL Piratininga – 98,65% CDI +0,10

       

 

In accordance with IAS 32 and 39, the Company and its subsidiaries classified their loans and financing, as segregated in the tables above, as (i) other financial liabilities (or measured at amortized cost), and (ii) financial liabilities measured at fair value through profit and loss.

 

F - 43


 
 

Table of Contents

 

The objective of classification of financial liabilities measured at fair value is to compare the effects of recognition of income and expense derived from marking derivatives to market, tied to the loans and financing, in order to obtain more relevant and consistent accounting information.

At December 31, 2012, the total balance of the loans and financing measured at fair value was R$ 2,388,245 (R$ 1,704,256 at December 31, 2011). Changes in the fair values of these loans and financing are recognized in the financial income (expense) of the subsidiaries. Losses of R$ 95,435 (R$ 7,359 at December 31, 2011) on marking the loans and financing to market, less the effects of R$ 81,753 (loss of R$ 1,241 at December 31, 2011) of marking to market the derivative financial instruments contracted as a hedge against foreign exchange variations (note 33), results in a total net loss of R$ 13,682 (R$ 8,600 at December 31, 2011).

 

Main fund-raising in the year:

Brazilian currency

BNDES/BNB – Investment:

FINEM VI (CPFL Paulista) – The subsidiary received approval for financing of R$ 790,000 in 2012, part of a FINEM credit line, to be used in the investment plan in 2012/2013. The amount of R$ 340,000 was received in 2012 (R$ 339,168 net of contracting costs) and the outstanding balance of R$ 450,000 is scheduled for release by the end of the first quarter of 2014.

FINEM V (CPFL Piratininga) – The subsidiary received approval for financing of R$ 220,000 in 2012, part of a FINEM credit line, to be used in the company’s investment plan in 2012/2013. The subsidiary received the amount of R$ 84,500 in 2012 (R$ 84,242 net of contracting costs), and the outstanding balance of R$ 135,500 is scheduled for release by the end of the first quarter of 2014.

FINEM VI (RGE) – The subsidiary received approval for financing of R$ 274,997 in 2012, part of a FINEM credit line, to be used in the company’s investment plan in 2012/2013. In 2012, the subsidiary received the amount of R$ 136,512 (R$ 136,218 net of contracting costs), and the outstanding balance is scheduled for release by the end of the first quarter of 2014.

FINEM I (CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Leste Paulista and CPFL Sul Paulista) – The subsidiaries received approval for financing of R$ 50,820 in 2012, part of a FINEM credit line, used in the company’s investment plan in 2011/2012. In 2012, the subsidiaries received the amount of R$ 45,451 (R$ 45,317 net of contracting costs) and the outstanding balance will be released by the end of the first quarter of 2013.  

FINAME I and FINEM XI (CPFL Renováveis) – The subsidiary CPFL Brasil obtained approval for financing of R$ 398,547 from the BNDES in 2010, which will be used for the indirect subsidiaries CPFL Bio Formosa, CPFL Bio Pedra, CPFL Bio Ipê and CPFL Bio Buriti. As a result of the corporate restructuring in 2011 (note 13), these debts have been recorded in the indirect subsidiary CPFL Renováveis as from August 1, 2011. The outstanding balance of R$ 72,551 was released in 2012.

FINEM III - CPFL Renováveis – In 2010, the subsidiary CPFL Geração obteve obtained approval for financing from the BNDES of R$ 574,098 in 2010, which will be used for the indirect subsidiaries Santa Clara I to VI and Eurus VI. As a result of the corporate restructuring in 2011 (note 13), these debts have been recorded in the indirect subsidiary CPFL Renováveis as from August 1, 2011. The amount of R$ 289,507 was released in 2012 and the outstanding balance of R$ 1,240 is scheduled for release by April 2013.

FINEM VI - CPFL Renováveis (Salto Goes) – in 2012, the BNDES approved a financing agreement for a total amount of up to R$ 85,244 to be used in an SHP venture. The amount of R$ 69,982 was released in 2012. The outstanding balance of R$ 15,262  is scheduled for release by April 2013.

FINEM VII, FINEM X, BNB Banco do Nordeste do Brasil and NIB Nordic Investment Bank - CPFL Renováveis (Bons Ventos) - The indirect subsidiary Bons Ventos, acquired within the context of the business combination described in note 13, had these transactions, which were in the Company’s financial statements as from June 2012.

FINEM VIII and   FINAME III – CPFL Renováveis (Coopcana and Alvorada) –  in 2012, the BNDES approved the contracting of financing of a total amount of up to R$ 209,000 to be used in the Bio Alvorada and Bio Coopcana thermoelectric power plant ventures. The amount of R$ 98,000 was released in 2012. The outstanding balance of R$ 111,000 is scheduled for release by November 2013.

 

 

F - 44


 
 

Table of Contents

 

FINEM IX - CPFL Renováveis (Lacenas) – The indirect subsidiary Lacenas, acquired in the context of the business combination described in note 13, had this transaction with the BNDES and it was in the company’s financial statements from October 2012.

Financial institutions:

Banco IBM S/A (CPFL Leste Paulista, CPFL Mococa, CPFL Jaguari and CPFL Serviços) – These subsidiaries obtained approval from Banco IBM for financing of R$ 41,355 in 2012 to reinforce working capital. The total amount approved was released in 2012.

HSBC - CPFL Renováveis – In June 2012, a financing operation was conducted between the indirect subsidiary Turbina 15 and Banco HSBC, for the purposes of investment to acquire BVP by issuing redeemable preferred shares in CPFL Renováveis.  In this transaction, HSBC paid in R$ 400,000 in cash (R$ 395,805 net of costs).  

Banco do Brasil – Promissory Notes (CPFL Renováveis) – in 2012, the indirect subsidiaries Atlântica I, Atlântica II, Atlântica IV, Atlântica V, Alvorada and Coopcana signed financing agreements with Banco do Brasil. The funds, in the form of promissory notes totaling R$320,000, are to be used in the construction of four wind farms and two biomass power plants. The whole amount was released on signing of the agreement and the financing was settled in January 2013.

Foreign currency

Financial institutions

Banco Citibank (RGE) – In April 2012, the subsidiary contracted foreign currency loans of R$ 128,590 to reinforce working capital.  

Banco Scotiabank (CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga, CPFL Leste Paulista, CPFL Sul Paulista, CPFL Jaguari, CPFL Mococa) – The subsidiaries obtained approval for foreign currency financing of R$ 172,500, to reinforce working capital, and the full amount was released in 2012.

Banco J.P. Morgan (RGE, CPFL Sul Paulista and CPFL Santa Cruz) – The subsidiaries obtained approval for financing of R$ 124,910, to reinforce working capital, and the full amount was released in 2012.

The maturities of the principal long-term balances of loans and financing are scheduled as follows:

 

     

2014

 

2,031,138

2015

 

1,504,564

2016

 

1,577,857

2017

 

756,670

2018

 

556,760

After 2018

 

2,513,113

Subtotal

 

8,940,101

Mark to Market

 

95,433

Total

 

9,035,534

 

The main financial rates applicable for our loans and financing their related breakdown in local and foreign currency, after taking into consideration the effects of the derivative instruments, are as shown below:

 

   

Accumulated variation - %

% of debt

Index

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

IGP-M

 

7.81

 

5.10

 

0.92

 

0.31

UMBND

 

8.57

 

12.86

 

0.85

 

1.12

TJLP

 

5.75

 

6.00

 

42.62

 

52.87

CDI

 

8.40

 

11.59

 

43.56

 

40.51

Other

         

12.05

 

5.19

           

100

 

100

 

RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS

 

F - 45


 
 

Table of Contents

 

BNDES:

Financing from the BNDES restricts the subsidiaries CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga, RGE, CPFL Santa Cruz, , CPFL Leste Paulista and CPFL Sul Paulista to: (i) not paying dividends and interest on shareholders’ equity totaling more than the minimum mandatory dividend laid down by law without  complying with all the contractual obligations; (ii) full compliance with the restrictive conditions established in the agreement; and (iii) maintaining certain financial ratios within pre-established parameters, calculated annually:

CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga and RGE

·         Net indebtedness divided by EBITDA – maximum of 3.5;

·         Net indebtedness divided by the sum of net indebtedness and net equity – maximum of 0.90.

CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Leste Paulista and CPFL Sul Paulista (measured in the subsidiaries and in the Company)

·         Net indebtedness divided by EBITDA – maximum of 3.5;

CPFL Mococa e CPFL Jaguari

Have no financial covenants.

 

In 2012, the subsidiary CPFL Leste Paulista signed an agreement with the BNDES for financing of R$ 12,272.  The agreement includes restrictive covenants clauses that require the subsidiary to maintain a maximum “Net Indebtedness divided by adjusted EBITDA” ratio of 3.5. At December 31, 2012 the subsidiary had not complied with this obligation, which could result in dividends being withheld until the financial ratios are re-established. Failure to comply with this non-monetary obligation does not involve the possibility of early maturity of this debt, neither does it result in early maturity of other debts with specific cross-default conditions.

 

CPFL Geração

The loans from the BNDES raised by the subsidiary CERAN and the jointly-controlled entities ENERCAN, BAESA and Foz do Chapecó establish restrictions on the payment of dividends to the subsidiary CPFL Geração higher than the minimum mandatory dividend of 25% without the prior agreement of the BNDES.

There is also a restrictive clause in relation to the BNDES loan to the jointly-controlled entity EPASA (under the FINEM system), in respect of maintaining a debt coverage ratio at 1.1 and a minimum own capital ratio (equity divided by fixed assets) of 25.3%, determined annually. If this is not complied with, the distribution of dividends in excess of the minimum mandatory dividend is prohibited until the index is complied with. The guarantor (Company) is also required to maintain the following financial ratios:

 

CPFL Renováveis

The main restrictive clauses for the loans from the BNDES under the FINEM I, FINEM VII, FINAME I and FINEM X, BNB and NIB (Bons Ventos) and FINEM VI (Salto Goes) systems are:

 

·         Debt coverage ratio of 1.2 during the amortization period;

·         Own capitalization ratio of 25% or more during the amortization period.

At December 31, 2012 the indirect subsidiary Santa Luzia Energética S.A. (subsidiary of CPFL Renováveis) had not complied with the debt coverage ratio (ICSD), which requires cash generation of 1.2 times the debt service amount for the period. The total amount of the debt, R$ 112,747, was classified in current liabilities. Early maturity of the debt due to non-compliance with the debt coverage ratio was not declared at December 31, 2012 and on February 20, 2013, the subsidiary obtained a waiver from Banco do Brasil that dismiss the subsidiary to comply with the debt coverage ratio for the year ended December 31, 2012, for the year ending December 31, 2013 and the half-year ending June 30, 2014. Failure to comply with the covenant also did not result in early maturity of other debts with specific cross-default conditions.

 

 

F - 46


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Banco do Brasil – Working Capital  

In 2012, the agreements with Banco do Brasil – working capital of the subsidiaries CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga, RGE, CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Sul Paulista, CPFL Jaguari, CPFL Mococa and CPFL Leste Paulista, were amended to their financial covenants being now calculated half-yearly based on Company indicators. The new covenants ratios are:

·         Net indebtedness divided by EBITDA  - maximum of 3.75; and

·         EBITDA divided by Financial Income (Expense) - minimum of 2.25.

 

Foreign currency loans - Bank of America, BNP Paribás, J.P Morgan, Société Générale, Citibank, Morgan Stanley, HSBC, Sumitomo and Scotiabank

The foreign currency loans from the Bank of America, BNP Paribás, J.P Morgan, Société Générale, Citibank, Morgan Stanley, HSBC, Sumitomo and Scotiabank banks are subject to certain restrictive conditions, and include clauses that require the subsidiaries that obtained the loans to maintain certain financial ratios within pre-established parameters.

 

Addenda were made in 2012 to the foreign currency agreements in order to bring the Financial Covenants into line with the other agreements in local currency.

 

The ratios required are as follows: (i) Net indebtedness divided by EBITDA – maximum of 3.75 and (ii) EBITDA divided by Financial Income (Expense) – minimum of 2.25.

For purposes of determining covenants, the definition of EBITDA for the subsidiaries takes into consideration inclusion of the main regulatory assets and liabilities. In the Company’s case, it also takes into account consolidation based on the interest in the respective subsidiaries (for both EBITDA and assets and liabilities).

Other loan and financing agreements of the direct and indirect subsidiaries are subject to early settlement in the event of changes in the Company’s structure or in the corporate structure of the subsidiaries that result in the loss of the share control or of control over Management of the Company by the Company’s current shareholders, unless at least one of the shareholders (Camargo Corrêa and Previ) remains directly or indirectly in the block of control by the Company.

Furthermore, failure to comply with the obligations or restrictions mentioned could result in default in relation to other contractual obligations (cross default), depending on each loan and financing agreement.

The Management of the Company and its subsidiaries monitor these ratios systematically and constantly to ensure that the contractual conditions are complied with. In the opinion of the Management, these restrictive covenants and clauses are being adequately complied with, except as mentioned previously in relation to the indirectly-controlled entity CPFL Renováveis and the subsidiary CPFL Leste Paulista, all the restrictive conditions and clauses are being adequately complied with at December 31, 2012.

 

( 16 )  ACCRUED INTEREST ON DEBENTURES AND DEBENTURES

 

 

F - 47


 
 

Table of Contents

 

     

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

     

Interest

 

Current

 

Noncurrent

 

Total

 

Interest

 

Current

 

Noncurrent

 

Total

Parent Company

                                 

3rd Issue

Single series

 

7,082

 

150,000

 

150,000

 

307,082

 

16,403

 

150,000

 

300,000

 

466,403

                                   

CPFL Paulista

                                 

3rd Issue

Single series

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

3,846

 

213,333

 

213,333

 

430,513

5th Issue

Single series

 

2,931

 

-

 

482,726

 

485,657

 

4,704

 

-

 

482,363

 

487,067

6th Issue

Single series

 

26,304

 

-

 

657,800

 

684,105

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

     

29,235

 

-

 

1,140,527

 

1,169,762

 

8,551

 

213,333

 

695,696

 

917,580

CPFL Piratininga

                                 

3rd Issue

Single series

 

4,645

 

-

 

259,391

 

264,036

 

7,310

 

-

 

259,129

 

266,439

5th Issue

Single series

 

969

 

-

 

159,537

 

160,506

 

1,555

 

-

 

159,405

 

160,960

6th Issue

Single series

 

4,384

 

-

 

109,474

 

113,858

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

     

9,998

 

-

 

528,403

 

538,400

 

8,865

 

-

 

418,534

 

427,399

RGE

                                 

3rd Issue

1st Series

 

184

 

33,333

 

-

 

33,517

 

609

 

33,333

 

33,333

 

67,275

 

2nd Series

 

3,383

 

46,667

 

-

 

50,050

 

7,950

 

46,667

 

46,667

 

101,284

 

3rd Series

 

767

 

13,333

 

-

 

14,100

 

1,848

 

13,333

 

13,333

 

28,514

 

4th Series

 

511

 

16,667

 

-

 

17,178

 

1,226

 

16,667

 

16,667

 

34,560

 

5th Series

 

511

 

16,667

 

-

 

17,178

 

1,226

 

16,667

 

16,667

 

34,560

5th Issue

Single series

 

424

 

-

 

69,766

 

70,190

 

680

 

-

 

69,699

 

70,379

6th Issue

Single series

 

19,928

 

-

 

498,306

 

518,234

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

     

25,708

 

126,667

 

568,072

 

720,447

 

13,539

 

126,667

 

196,366

 

336,572

CPFL Santa Cruz

                                 

1st Issue

Single series

 

292

 

-

 

64,753

 

65,045

 

454

 

-

 

64,694

 

65,148

CPFL Brasil

                                 

2nd Issue

Single series

 

8,092

 

-

 

1,316,259

 

1,324,351

 

12,940

 

-

 

1,315,580

 

1,328,520

CPFL Geração

                                 

3rd Issuance

Single series

 

4,716

 

-

 

263,402

 

268,118

 

7,423

 

-

 

263,137

 

270,560

4th Issuance

Single series

 

4,169

 

-

 

677,908

 

682,077

 

6,666

 

-

 

677,527

 

684,193

     

8,885

 

-

 

941,310

 

950,195

 

14,089

 

-

 

940,664

 

954,753

EPASA

                                 

3rd Issuance

Single series

 

362

 

16,959

 

45,717

 

63,038

 

3,670

 

5,480

 

62,364

 

71,514

BAESA

                                 

1st Issue

1st Series

 

153

 

3,139

 

8,664

 

11,956

 

299

 

3,150

 

11,812

 

15,261

 

2nd Series

 

126

 

2,595

 

7,106

 

9,827

 

245

 

2,584

 

9,691

 

12,520

     

279

 

5,734

 

15,770

 

21,783

 

544

 

5,734

 

21,503

 

27,781

Enercan

                                 

1st Issue

1st Series

 

148

 

3,616

 

43,393

 

47,158

 

281

 

3,616

 

47,009

 

50,906

                                   

CPFL Renováveis

                                 

1st Issuance - SIIF

1st to 12th Series

 

1,774

 

33,483

 

481,051

 

516,308

 

4,214

 

26,355

 

486,241

 

516,810

1st Issuance - Renovaveis

Single series

 

3,760

 

-

 

426,921

 

430,681

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

1st Issuance - PCH Holding 2

Single series

 

-

 

-

 

172,968

 

172,968

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

     

5,534

 

33,483

 

1,080,940

 

1,119,957

 

4,214

 

26,355

 

486,241

 

516,810

                                   

Total

   

95,614

 

336,459

 

5,895,143

 

6,327,216

 

83,552

 

531,185

 

4,548,651

 

5,163,388

 

 

F - 48


 
 

Table of Contents

 

   

Issued

 

Annual Remuneration

 

Annual Effective rate

 

Amortization Conditions

 

Collateral

Parent Company

                   

3rd Issue

Single series

45,000

 

CDI + 0.45% (1)

 

CDI + 0.53%

 

3 annual installments from September 2012

 

Unsecured

                     

CPFL Paulista

                   

3rd Issue

Single series

-

 

104.4% of CDI

 

104.4% CDI + 0.05%

 

3 annual installments from December 2011

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

5th Issue

Single series

4,840

 

CDI +1.3%

 

CDI + 1.4%

 

1 single installment in June 2016

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

6th Issue

Single series

660

 

CDI + 0.8%

 

CDI + 0.87%

 

3 annual installments from July 2017

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

                     

CPFL Piratininga

                   

3rd Issue

Single series

260

 

107% of CDI

 

107% CDI + 0.67%

 

1 single installment in April 2015

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

5th Issue

Single series

1,600

 

CDI + 1.3%

 

CDI + 1.41%

 

1 single installment in June 2016

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

6th Issue

Single series

110

 

CDI + 0.8%

 

CDI + 0.91%

 

3 annual installments from July 2017

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

                     

RGE

                   

3rd Issue

1st Series

1

 

CDI + 0.6% (2)

 

CDI + 0.71%

 

3 annual installments from December 2011

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

 

2nd Series

1

 

CDI + 0.6% (3)

 

CDI + 0.71%

 

3 annual installments from December 2011

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

 

3rd Series

1

 

CDI + 0.6% (4)

 

CDI + 0.71%

 

3 annual installments from December 2011

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

 

4th Series

1

 

CDI + 0.6% (5)

 

CDI + 0.84%

 

3 annual installments from December 2011

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

 

5th Series

1

 

CDI + 0.6% (5)

 

CDI + 0.84%

 

3 annual installments from December 2011

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

5th Issue

Single series

700

 

CDI + 1.3%

 

CDI + 1.43%

 

1 single installment in June 2016

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

6th Issue

Single series

500

 

CDI + 0.8%

 

CDI + 0.88%

 

3 annual installments from July 2017

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

                     

CPFL Santa Cruz

                   

1st Issue

Single series

650

 

CDI + 1.4%

 

CDI + 1.52%

 

2 annual instalments from June 2017

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

CPFL Brasil

                   

2nd Issue

Single series

13,200

 

CDI + 1.4%

 

CDI + 1.48%

 

2 annual instalments from June 2017

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

                     

CPFL Geração

                   

3rd Issuance

Single series

264

 

107% of CDI

 

107% of CDI + 0.67%

 

1 installment in April 2015

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

4th Issuance

Single series

6,800

 

CDI + 1.4%

 

CDI + 1.49%

 

2 annual instalments from June 2017

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

                     

EPASA

                   

3rd Issuance

Single series

130

 

113.5% of CDI

 

113.5% + 0.189% 

 

48 monthly installments from September 2012

 

CPFL Energia guarantee (70%)

                     

BAESA

                   

1st Issue

1st Series

9,000

 

CDI + 1.3%

 

100% of CDI + 0.43%

 

Quarterly with settlement in August 2016

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

 

2nd Series

8,100

 

CDI + 1.3%

 

106% of CDI + 0.12%

 

Annual with settlement in August 2016

 

CPFL Energia guarantee

                     

Enercan

                   

1st Issue

1st Series

110

 

100% of CDI + 1.25%

 

111.1% of CDI

 

Quarterly with settlement in December 2025

 

Unsecured

                     

CPFL Renováveis

                   

1st Issuance - SIIF

1st to 12th Series

528,649,076

 

TJLP + 1%

 

TJLP + 1% + 0.22%

 

39 consecutive semi-annual installments from 2009

 

Fiduciary alienation

1st Issuance - Renovaveis

Single series

1,581

 

CDI + 1.6%

 

CDI + 1.6%

 

9 annual installments from 2015 to 2023 and monthly interest from June 2015

 

CPFL Renováveis guarantee

1st Issuance - PCH Holding 2

Single series

43,000

 

CDI + 1.7%

 

CDI + 1.7%

 

Annual installments from May 2015 and interest semi-annual installments from November 2012

 

Fiduciary alienation of BVP and PCH Holding dividends

                     

The Company and its subsidiaries hold swaps that convert the prefixed component of interest on the operation to interest rate variation in reais, corresponding to:

(1) 104.4% of CDI

   

(3) 104.85% of CDI

     

(5) 104.87% of CDI

   

(2) 105.07% of CDI

   

(4) 104.9% of CDI

           

 

 

F - 49


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Interest

Interest on the debentures will be paid half yearly, except for the 1st series of the jointly-controlled entity BAESA, which will be paid quarterly and the 1st issue of the indirectly-controlled entity PCH Holding 2, which will be paid monthly.

The maturities of the long-term balance of debentures are scheduled as follow

 

2014

 

207,058

2015

 

626,472

2016

 

813,927

2017

 

1,461,679

2018

 

1,530,762

After 2018

 

1,255,245

Total

 

5,895,143

 

Fundraising during the year

CPFL Renováveis

·         1st issuance – PCH Holding

In January 2012, the indirect subsidiary PCH Holding 2 S.A., subsidiary of CPFL Renováveis, issued debentures not convertible into shares, of R$ 158,193 (R$ 156,010 net of issue costs), maturing in 2023, to finance the acquisition of SHP Santa Luzia. The interest will be paid monthly from June 2015 and the principal will be paid in nine consecutive annual installments, starting in June 2015.

·         1st issuance – CPFL Renováveis

In May 2012, the subsidiary CPFL Renováveis issued debentures not convertible into shares, of R$ 430,000 (R$ 426,327 net of issue costs), maturing in 2022, to finance the acquisition of Bons Ventos. The interest will be paid semi-annually from November 2012 and the principal will be paid in nine consecutive annual installments, starting in May 2015.

CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga e RGE

6th issuance

In July 2012, a single series of unsecured debentures, not convertible into shares, was issued and subscribed, totaling R$ 1,270,000 (R$ 1,265,301 net of issuance costs), as detailed below. The funds will be used to refinance debts maturing in 2012 and 2013 and to reinforce working capital. The debentures were guaranteed by the Company.

 

Subsidiary

 

Quantity

 

Unit nominal value
R$ thousand

 

Total issuance
R$ thousand

 

Net of issuance costs
R$ thousand

CPFL Paulista

 

660

 

1,000

 

660,000

 

657,661

CPFL Piratininga

 

110

 

1,000

 

110,000

 

109,441

RGE

 

500

 

1,000

 

500,000

 

498,199

           

1,270,000

 

1,265,301

 

RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS

The debentures are subject to certain restrictive covenants and include clauses that require the Company and its subsidiaries to maintain certain financial ratios within pre-established parameters. The main ratios are as follows:

CPFL Energia, CPFL Paulista (5th and 6th issues), CPFL Piratininga (3rd, 5th and 6th issues), RGE (5th and 6th issues), CPFL Geração (3rd and 4th issues), CPFL Brasil and CPFL Santa Cruz

Maintenance, by the Company, of the following ratios:

·         Net indebtedness divided by EBITDA – maximum of 3.75;

·         EBITDA divided by Financial Income (Expense) - minimum of 2.25;

BAESA

F - 50


 
 

Table of Contents

 

·            Total indebtedness – restricted to 75% of its total assets.

 

CPFL Renováveis

- 1st issue CPFL Renováveis

·       Operating debt coverage ratio - minimum of 1.00;

·       Debt service coverage ratio - minimum of 1.05;

·       Net indebtedness divided by EBITDA – maximum of 7.5 in 2013, 6.0 in 2014, 5.6 in 2015, 4.6 in 2016 and 3.75 from 2017;

·       EBITDA divided by Net financial expense- minimum of 1.75

 

- Indirectly controlled entity SIIF: the debentures are subject to restrictive covenants in respect of creating encumbrances and additional indebtedness, distribution of dividends and changes to the corporate structure.

- Indirectly controlled entity PCH Holding 2 S.A: debentures are subject to restrictive covenants in respect of changes in the company’s structure or in the corporate structure of the indirectly controlled entity CPFL Renováveis. Furthermore, there are restrictive clauses in respect of maintaining the following financial ratios in the CPFL Renováveis’s financial statements:

·       Consolidated leverage ratio of 80% or less;

·       Debt service coverage ratio with accumulated cash – minimum of 1.15.

 

The definition of EBITDA in the subsidiaries, for purposes of determination of covenants, mainly takes into consideration inclusion of the principal regulatory assets and liabilities. In the Company’s case, it also takes into account consolidation based on the interest in the respective subsidiaries (both for EBITDA and for assets and liabilities).

 

Certain debentures of subsidiaries and jointly-controlled entities are subject to early settlement in the event of changes in the Company’s structure or in the corporate structure of the subsidiaries that result in the loss of the share control or of control over Management of the Company by the Company’s current shareholders.

Failure to comply with the restrictions mentioned could result in default in relation to other contractual obligations (cross default), depending on each agreement.

In the opinion of the Management of the Company and its subsidiaries and jointly-controlled entities, these restrictive covenants and clauses are adequately complied with at December 31, 2012.

 

( 17 )  POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFIT OBLIGATION

 

The subsidiaries sponsor supplementary retirement and pension plans for their employees. The main characteristics of these plans are as follows:

 

17.1 – Characteristics:

- CPFL Paulista:

The plan currently in force for the employees of the subsidiary CPFL Paulista through Fundação CESP is a Mixed Benefit Plan, with the following characteristics:

a)     Defined Benefit Plan (“BD”) – in force until October 31, 1997 – a defined benefit plan, which grants a Proportional Supplementary Defined Benefit (“BSPS”), in the form of a lifetime income convertible into a pension, to participants enrolled prior to October 31, 1997, the amount being defined in proportion to the accumulated past service time up to that date, based on compliance with the regulatory requirements for granting. The total responsibility for coverage of actuarial deficits of this plan falls to the subsidiary.

b)    Mixed model, as from November 1, 1997, which covers:

·    benefits for risk (disability and death), under a defined benefit plan, in which the subsidiary assumes  responsibility for Plan’s actuarial deficit, and

F - 51


 
 

Table of Contents

 

·    scheduled retirement, under a variable contribution plan, consisting of a benefit plan, which is a defined contribution plan up to the granting of the income, and does not generate any actuarial liability for the subsidiary CPFL Paulista. The benefit plan only becomes a defined benefit plan, consequently generating actuarial responsibility for the subsidiary, after the granting of a lifetime income, convertible or not into a pension.

As a result of modification of the Retirement Plan in October 1997, a liability was recognized as payable by the subsidiary CPFL Paulista in relation to the plan deficit calculated by the external actuaries of Fundação CESP.  The liability, to be settled in 260 installments (240 monthly and 20 annual installments) with maturities to October 2017, plus interest of 6% p.a. and restatement at the IGP-DI rate (FGV), is amortized on a monthly basis. Under the Contractual Amendment signed with Fundação CESP on January 17, 2008, the payment terms were amended to 238 monthly installments and 19 annual installments, as of the base date of December 31, 2007, with final maturity on October 31, 2027. The amount of the obligation at December 31, 2012 is R$ 570,939 (R$ 452,756 at December 31, 2011). At the end of each year, after appraisal by external actuaries, the balance of the debt is adjusted to reflect the equilibrium of the equity of the Fundação CESP pension plans. The contract amount differs from the carrying amount recorded by the subsidiary, which is in accordance with IAS 19.

Managers may opt for a Free Benefit Generator Plan – PGBL (defined contribution), operated by either Banco do Brasil or Bradesco.

 

- CPFL Piratininga:

As a result of the spin-off of Bandeirante Energia S.A. (CPFL Piratininga’s predecessor), the subsidiary CPFL Piratininga assumed the responsibility for the actuarial liabilities for its retired and discharged employees up to the date of the spin-off, as well as the responsibilities relating to the active employees transferred to CPFL Piratininga.

On April 2, 1998, the Supplementary Welfare Office – “SPC”, approved the restructuring of the retirement plan previously maintained by Bandeirante, creating a "Proportional Supplementary Defined Benefit Plan – BSPS”, and a "Mixed Benefit Plan", with the following characteristics:

a) Defined Benefit Plan (“BD”) - in force until March 31, 1998 – a defined-benefit plan, which concedes a Proportional Supplementary Defined Benefit (BSPS), in the form of a lifetime income convertible into a pension to participants registered up to March 31, 1998, to an amount calculated in proportion to the accumulated past service time up to that date, based on compliance with the regulatory requirements for granting. In the event of death while working or the onset of a disability, the benefits incorporate the entire past service time. CPFL Piratininga has full responsibility for covering the actuarial deficits of this Plan.

b) Defined Benefit Plan - in force after March 31, 1998 – defined-benefit type plan, which concedes a lifetime income convertible into a pension based on the past service time accumulated after March 31, 1998, based on 70% of the average actual monthly salary for the last 36 months of active service. In the event of death while working or the onset of a disability, the benefits incorporate the entire past service time. The responsibility for covering the actuarial deficits of this Plan is equally divided between CPFL Piratininga and the participants.

c) Variable Contribution Plan – implemented together with the Defined Benefit plan effective after March 31, 1998.  This is a defined-benefit type pension plan up to the granting of the income, and generates no actuarial liability for CPFL Piratininga. The pension plan only becomes a Defined Benefit type plan after the concession of the lifetime income, convertible (or not) into a pension, and accordingly starts to generate actuarial liabilities for the subsidiary.

In September 1997, through a contractual instrument of adjustment of reserves to be amortized, Eletropaulo Metropolitana El. São Paulo S.A. (the predecessor of Bandeirante) recognized an obligation to pay referring to the plan deficit determined at the time by the external actuaries of the Fundação CESP, to be liquidated in 260 installments (240 monthly and 20 annual installments), amortized monthly, plus interest of 6% p.a. and restatement at the IGP-DI rate (FGV). Under the Contractual Amendment, signed with Fundação CESP on January 17, 2008, the payment terms were amended to 221 monthly payments and 18 annual installments, as of December 31, 2007, with final maturity on May 31, 2026.  The balance of the obligation at December 31, 2012 is R$ 164,517 (R$ 126,669 at December 31, 2011). At the end of each year, after appraisal by external actuaries, the balance of the debt is adjusted to reflect the equilibrium of the equity of the Fundação CESP pension plans. The contract amount differs from the carrying amount recorded by the subsidiary, which is in accordance with IAS 19.

 

F - 52


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Managers may opt for a Free Benefit Generator Plan – PGBL (defined contribution), operated by either Banco do Brasil or Bradesco.

 

- RGE:

A defined benefit type plan, with a benefit level equal to 100% of the adjusted average of the most recent salaries, less the presumed Social Security benefit, with a Segregated Net Asset management by ELETROCEEE. Only those whose work contracts were transferred from CEEE to RGE are entitled to this benefit. A defined benefit private pension plan was set up in January 2006 with Bradesco Vida e Previdência for employees admitted from 1997.

 

- CPFL Santa Cruz:

The benefits plan of the subsidiary CPFL Santa Cruz, managed by BB Previdência - Fundo de Pensão do Banco do Brasil, is a defined contribution plan.

 

- CPFL Leste Paulista, CPFL Sul Paulista, CPFL Mococa and CPFL Jaguari:

In December 2005, the companies joined the CMSPREV private pension plan, managed by IHPREV Pension Fund. The plan is structured as a defined contribution plan.

 

- CPFL Geração:

The employees of the subsidiary CPFL Geração belong to the same pension plan as CPFL Paulista.

With the modification of the Retirement Plan, at that point maintained by CPFL Paulista, in October 1997, a liability was recognized as payable by the subsidiary CPFL Geração, in relation to the plan deficit calculated by the external actuaries of Fundação CESP, to be amortized in 260 installments (240 monthly and 20 annual installments), plus interest of 6% p.a. and restatement at the IGP-DI rate (FGV). Under the Contractual Amendment, signed with Fundação CESP on January 17, 2008, the payment terms were amended to 238 monthly installments and 19 annual installments, as of December 31, 2007, with final maturity on October 31, 2027. The balance of the obligation, at December 31, 2012, is R$ 11,495 (R$ 8,972 at December 31, 2011 and R$ 9,571 at January 1, 2011). The contract amount differs from the carrying amount recorded by the subsidiary, which is in accordance with IAS 19.

Managers may opt for a Free Benefit Generator Plan – PGBL (defined contribution), operated by either Banco do Brasil or Bradesco.

 

17.2 – Changes in the defined benefit plans:

 

   

December 31, 2012

   

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

Total liability

 

RGE

 

Total asset

   

Paulista

 

Piratininga

 

Geração

     

Present value of defined benefit obligation

 

4,431,699

 

1,159,779

 

101,714

 

5,693,192

 

298,014

 

298,014

Fair value of plan's assets

 

(3,774,468)

 

(985,557)

 

(93,360)

 

(4,853,385)

 

(271,878)

 

(271,878)

Present value of liabilities (fair value of assets), net

 

657,231

 

174,222

 

8,354

 

839,807

 

26,136

 

26,136

Adjustments due to deferments allowed:

                       

Unrecognized actuarial gains/(losses)

 

(362,491)

 

(114,168)

 

(2,934)

 

(479,593)

 

(36,339)

 

(36,339)

Net actuarial liabilities (assets) recognized on balance sheet

 

294,740

 

60,054

 

5,420

 

360,214

 

(10,203)

 

(10,203)

                         
   

December 31, 2011

   

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

Total liability

 

RGE

 

Total asset

   

Paulista

 

Piratininga

 

Geração

     

Present value of defined benefit obligation

 

3,505,727

 

884,091

 

76,649

 

4,466,467

 

234,457

 

234,457

Fair value of plan's assets

 

(3,236,676)

 

(839,877)

 

(80,058)

 

(4,156,611)

 

(218,799)

 

(218,799)

Present value of liabilities (fair value of assets), net

 

269,051

 

44,214

 

(3,409)

 

309,856

 

15,658

 

15,658

Adjustments due to deferments allowed:

                       

Unrecognized actuarial gains/(losses)

 

83,371

 

33,768

 

11,308

 

128,447

 

(19,074)

 

(19,074)

Net actuarial Liabilities (assets) recognized on balance sheet

 

352,422

 

77,982

 

7,899

 

438,303

 

(3,416)

 

(3,416)

 

 

F - 53


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

   

December 31, 2010

   

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

Total liability

 

RGE

 

Total asset

   

Paulista

 

Piratininga

 

Geração

     

Present value of defined benefit obligation

 

3,088,723

 

784,933

 

67,543

 

3,941,199

 

207,759

 

207,759

Fair value of plan's assets

 

(2,987,448)

 

(785,231)

 

(70,177)

 

(3,842,856)

 

(245,537)

 

(245,537)

Present value of liabilities (fair value of assets), net

 

101,275

 

(298)

 

(2,634)

 

98,343

 

(37,778)

 

(37,778)

Adjustments due to deferments allowed:

                       

Unrecognized actuarial gains/(losses)

 

368,348

 

111,872

 

14,086

 

494,306

 

31,978

 

31,978

Net actuarial Liabilities (assets) recognized on balance sheet

 

469,623

 

111,574

 

11,452

 

592,649

 

(5,800)

 

(5,800)

 

The changes in present value of the benefit obligations and the fair values of the plan assets are as follows:

 

2012:

   

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

RGE

 

Total liability

   

Paulista

 

Piratininga

 

Geração

   

Present value of defined benefit obligation at December 31, 2011

 

3,505,727

 

884,091

 

76,649

 

234,457

 

4,700,924

Gross current service cost

 

1,186

 

4,349

 

144

 

1,176

 

6,855

Interest on actuarial obligation

 

350,009

 

88,813

 

7,663

 

23,599

 

470,084

Participants' contributions transferred during the year

 

171

 

1,545

 

35

 

947

 

2,698

Actuarial loss

 

845,470

 

237,425

 

23,429

 

51,673

 

1,157,997

Benefits paid during the year

 

(270,864)

 

(56,444)

 

(6,206)

 

(13,838)

 

(347,352)

Present value of defined benefit obligation at December 31, 2012

 

4,431,699

 

1,159,779

 

101,714

 

298,014

 

5,991,206

                     
   

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

RGE

 

Total asset

   

Paulista

 

Piratininga

 

Geração

   

Current value of actuarial assets at December 31, 2011

 

(3,236,676)

 

(839,877)

 

(80,058)

 

(218,799)

 

(4,375,410)

Expected return during the year

 

(361,169)

 

(96,434)

 

(8,978)

 

(26,429)

 

(493,010)

Participants' contributions transferred during the year

 

(171)

 

(1,545)

 

(35)

 

(947)

 

(2,698)

Sponsors' contributions

 

(47,708)

 

(14,655)

 

(1,041)

 

(5,132)

 

(68,536)

Actuarial gain

 

(399,608)

 

(89,490)

 

(9,454)

 

(34,409)

 

(532,961)

Benefits paid during the year

 

270,864

 

56,444

 

6,206

 

13,838

 

347,352

Current value of actuarial assets at December 31, 2012

 

(3,774,468)

 

(985,557)

 

(93,360)

 

(271,878)

 

(5,125,263)

 

2011:

   

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

RGE

 

Total liability

   

Paulista

 

Piratininga

 

Geração

   

Present value of defined benefit obligation at December 31, 2010

 

3,088,723

 

784,933

 

67,543

 

207,759

 

4,148,958

Gross current service cost

 

1,043

 

3,781

 

136

 

1,221

 

6,181

Interest on actuarial obligation

 

304,730

 

77,929

 

6,673

 

20,742

 

410,074

Participants' contributions transferred during the year

 

65

 

1,472

 

13

 

701

 

2,251

Actuarial loss

 

358,544

 

67,610

 

7,474

 

14,784

 

448,412

Benefits paid during the year

 

(247,378)

 

(51,634)

 

(5,190)

 

(10,750)

 

(314,952)

Present value of defined benefit obligation at December 31, 2011

 

3,505,727

 

884,091

 

76,649

 

234,457

 

4,700,924

                     
   

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

RGE

 

Total asset

   

Paulista

 

Piratininga

 

Geração

   

Current value of actuarial assets at December 31, 2010

 

(2,987,448)

 

(785,231)

 

(70,177)

 

(245,537)

 

(4,088,393)

Expected return during the year

 

(369,344)

 

(97,889)

 

(8,706)

 

(22,423)

 

(498,362)

Participants' contributions transferred during the year

 

(65)

 

(1,472)

 

(13)

 

(701)

 

(2,251)

Sponsors' contributions

 

(48,900)

 

(14,965)

 

(1,071)

 

(4,072)

 

(69,008)

Actuarial (gain)/loss

 

(78,297)

 

8,046

 

(5,281)

 

43,184

 

(32,348)

Benefits paid during the year

 

247,378

 

51,634

 

5,190

 

10,750

 

314,952

Current value of actuarial assets at December 31, 2011

 

(3,236,676)

 

(839,877)

 

(80,058)

 

(218,799)

 

(4,375,410)

 

 

F - 54


 
 

Table of Contents

 

2010:

   

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

RGE

 

Total liability

   

Paulista

 

Piratininga

 

Geração

   

Present value of defined benefit obligation at December 31, 2009

 

2,962,118

 

760,719

 

64,198

 

182,615

 

3,969,650

Gross current service cost

 

1,061

 

3,550

 

142

 

202

 

4,955

Interest on actuarial obligation

 

292,456

 

75,535

 

6,345

 

18,349

 

392,685

Participants' contributions transferred during the year

 

190

 

1,156

 

1

 

1,597

 

2,944

Actuarial loss/(gain)

 

64,883

 

(9,660)

 

1,794

 

12,346

 

69,363

Benefits paid during the year

 

(231,985)

 

(46,367)

 

(4,937)

 

(7,350)

 

(290,639)

Present value of defined benefit obligation at December 31, 2010

 

3,088,723

 

784,933

 

67,543

 

207,759

 

4,148,958

                     
   

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

RGE

 

Total asset

   

Paulista

 

Piratininga

 

Geração

   

Current value of actuarial assets at December 31, 2009

 

(2,611,813)

 

(676,790)

 

(54,969)

 

(212,369)

 

(3,555,941)

Expected return during the year

 

(364,286)

 

(93,152)

 

(7,679)

 

(23,718)

 

(488,835)

Participants' contributions transferred during the year

 

(190)

 

(1,156)

 

(1)

 

(1,597)

 

(2,944)

Sponsors' contributions

 

(51,320)

 

(16,323)

 

(1,129)

 

(9,084)

 

(77,856)

Actuarial gain

 

(191,824)

 

(44,177)

 

(11,336)

 

(6,119)

 

(253,456)

Benefits paid during the year

 

231,985

 

46,367

 

4,937

 

7,350

 

290,639

Current value of actuarial assets at December 31, 2010

 

(2,987,448)

 

(785,231)

 

(70,177)

 

(245,537)

 

(4,088,393)

 

17.3 Changes in the assets and liabilities recognized:

The changes in net liabilities are as follows:

 

   

December 31, 2012

   

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

Total liability

 

RGE

 

Total asset

   

Paulista

 

Piratininga

 

Geração

     

Actuarial liabilities /(assets) at the beginning of the year

 

352,422

 

77,982

 

7,899

 

438,303

 

(3,416)

 

(3,416)

Expense recognized in income statement

 

(9,974)

 

(3,272)

 

(1,439)

 

(14,685)

 

(1,655)

 

(1,655)

Sponsors' contributions transferred during the year

 

(47,708)

 

(14,655)

 

(1,041)

 

(63,404)

 

(5,132)

 

(5,132)

Actuarial liabilities /(assets) at the end of the year

 

294,740

 

60,055

 

5,419

 

360,214

 

(10,203)

 

(10,203)

Other contributions

 

14,593

 

387

 

79

 

15,060

 

-

 

-

Subtotal

 

309,333

 

60,443

 

5,498

 

375,274

 

(10,203)

 

(10,203)

Other contributions RGE

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,857

       

Total liabilities

 

309,333

 

60,443

 

5,498

 

377,131

       

Current

             

51,675

     

-

Noncurrent

             

325,455

     

10,203

                         
   

December 31, 2011

   

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

Total liability

 

RGE

 

Total asset

   

Paulista

 

Piratininga

 

Geração

     

Actuarial liabilities /(assets) at the beginning of the year

 

469,623

 

111,574

 

11,452

 

592,649

 

(5,800)

 

(5,800)

Expense (Income) recognized in income statement

 

(68,301)

 

(18,627)

 

(2,482)

 

(89,410)

 

6,456

 

6,456

Sponsors' contributions transferred during the year

 

(48,900)

 

(14,965)

 

(1,071)

 

(64,936)

 

(4,072)

 

(4,072)

Actuarial liabilities /(assets) at the end of the year

 

352,422

 

77,982

 

7,899

 

438,304

 

(3,416)

 

(3,416)

Other contributions

 

14,090

 

318

 

77

 

14,484

 

-

 

-

Subtotal

 

366,512

 

78,300

 

7,976

 

452,788

 

(3,416)

 

(3,416)

Other contributions RGE

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

2,536

       

Total liabilities

 

366,512

 

78,300

 

7,976

 

455,324

       

Current

             

40,695

     

-

Noncurrent

             

414,629

     

3,416

                         
                         
                         
   

December 31, 2010

   

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

Total liability

 

RGE

 

Total asset

   

Paulista

 

Piratininga

 

Geração

     

Actuarial liabilities /(assets) at the beginning of the year

 

591,712

 

141,964

 

13,774

 

747,450

 

(9,725)

 

(9,725)

Expense (Income) recognized in income statement

 

(70,769)

 

(14,068)

 

(1,192)

 

(86,029)

 

5,400

 

5,400

Sponsors' contributions transferred during the year

 

(51,320)

 

(16,322)

 

(1,130)

 

(68,772)

 

(1,475)

 

(1,475)

Actuarial liabilities /(assets) at the end of the year

 

469,623

 

111,574

 

11,452

 

592,649

 

(5,800)

 

(5,800)

Other contributions

 

13,875

 

375

 

177

 

14,427

 

-

 

-

Subtotal

 

483,498

 

111,949

 

11,629

 

607,076

 

(5,800)

 

(5,800)

Other contributions RGE

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

3,905

       

Total liabilities

 

483,498

 

111,949

 

11,629

 

610,980

       

Current

             

40,103

     

-

Noncurrent

             

570,877

     

5,800

 

17.4 Recognition of income and expense of private pension fund:

In consensus with the Company Management, the external actuary’s estimate of the expense and/or revenue to be recognized in 2013 (already taking into consideration amendments to IAS 19 – note 2) and the income recognized in 2012, 2011 and 2010, is as follows:

 

 

F - 55


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

   

2013 Estimated

   

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

RGE

 

Consolidated

   

Paulista

 

Piratininga

 

Geração

   

Cost of service

 

1,627

 

6,897

 

185

 

654

 

9,363

Interest on actuarial obligations

 

376,851

 

99,249

 

8,650

 

25,510

 

510,260

Expected return on plan assets

 

(321,345)

 

(84,696)

 

(7,966)

 

(23,495)

 

(437,502)

Past service cost not recognized

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

Total Expense

 

57,133

 

21,450

 

869

 

2,669

 

82,121

                     
   

2012 Realized

   

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

RGE

 

Consolidated

   

Paulista

 

Piratininga

 

Geração

   

Cost of service

 

1,186

 

4,348

 

144

 

1,176

 

6,854

Interest on actuarial obligations

 

350,009

 

88,812

 

7,663

 

23,598

 

470,082

Expected return on plan assets

 

(361,169)

 

(96,432)

 

(8,978)

 

(26,429)

 

(493,008)

Amortization of unrecognized actuarial gains

 

-

 

-

 

(268)

 

-

 

(268)

Total Income

 

(9,974)

 

(3,272)

 

(1,439)

 

(1,655)

 

(16,340)

                     
   

2011 Realized

   

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

RGE

 

Consolidated

   

Paulista

 

Piratininga

 

Geração

   

Cost of service

 

1,044

 

3,781

 

136

 

1,221

 

6,182

Interest on actuarial obligations

 

304,732

 

77,929

 

6,673

 

20,742

 

410,076

Expected return on plan assets

 

(369,344)

 

(97,889)

 

(8,706)

 

(22,423)

 

(498,362)

Amortization of unrecognized actuarial gains

 

(4,733)

 

(2,448)

 

(585)

 

-

 

(7,766)

Recognition of the asset (limited to paragraph 58-b of IAS 19)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

6,916

 

6,916

Total (Income)/expense

 

(68,301)

 

(18,627)

 

(2,482)

 

6,456

 

(82,954)

                     
   

2010 Realized

   

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

CPFL

 

RGE

 

Consolidated

   

Paulista

 

Piratininga

 

Geração

   

Cost of service

 

1,061

 

3,550

 

142

 

1,153

 

5,906

Interest on actuarial obligations

 

292,456

 

75,534

 

6,345

 

18,349

 

392,684

Expected return on plan assets

 

(364,286)

 

(93,152)

 

(7,679)

 

(23,717)

 

(488,834)

Recognition of the asset (limited to paragraph 58-b of IAS 19)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

9,615

 

9,615

Total (Income)/expense

 

(70,769)

 

(14,068)

 

(1,192)

 

5,400

 

(80,629)

 

The principal assumptions taken into consideration in the actuarial calculations at the balance sheet date were:

 

CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga and CPFL Geração

RGE

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

                       

Nominal discount rate for actuarial liabilities:

8.78% p.a.

 

10.35% p.a.

 

10.24% p.a.

 

8.78% p.a.

 

10.35% p.a.

 

10.24% p.a.

Nominal Return Rate on Assets:

8.78% p.a.

 

(*)

 

(**)

 

8.78% p.a.

 

10.24% p.a.

 

11.28% p.a.

Estimated Rate of nominal salary increase:

6.69% p.a.

 

6.69% p.a.

 

6.08% p.a.

 

6.69% p.a.

 

6.69% p.a.

 

6.08% p.a.

Estimated Rate of nominal benefits increase:

0.0% p.a.

 

0.0% p.a.

 

0.0% p.a.

 

0.0% p.a.

 

0.0% p.a.

 

0.0% p.a.

Estimated long-term inflation rate (basis for establishing

                     

nominal rates above)

4.60% p.a.

 

4.60% p.a.

 

4.0% p.a.

 

4.6% p.a.

 

4.6% p.a.

 

4.0% p.a.

General biometric mortality table:

AT-83

 

AT-83

 

AT-83

 

AT-83

 

AT-83

 

AT-83

Biometric table for the onset of disability:

Mercer
Disability

 

Mercer
table

 

Mercer
table

 

Mercer
Disability

 

Light-
Average

 

Light-
Average

Expected turnover rate:

0.30 / (Service time + 1)

 

0.30 / (Service time + 1)

 

0.30 / (Service time + 1)

 

0.30 / (Service time + 1)

 

0.30 / (Service time + 1)

 

0.30 / (Service time + 1)

Likelihood of reaching retirement age:

100% when a beneficiary of the Plan first becomes eligible

 

100% when a beneficiary of the Plan first becomes eligible

 

100% when a beneficiary of the Plan first becomes eligible

 

100% when a beneficiary of the Plan first becomes eligible

 

100% when a beneficiary of the Plan first becomes eligible

 

100% when a beneficiary of the Plan first becomes eligible

                       

(*) CPFL Paulista and CPFL Geração 11,51% p.a, and CPFL Piratininga 11,72% p.a

(**) CPFL Paulista and CPFL Geração 12,73% p.a, and CPFL Piratininga 12,71% p.a

 

17.5 Plan assets

The following tables show the allocation (by asset segment) of the assets of the CPFL group pension plans, at December 31, 2012 and 2011 managed by Fundação CESP and ELETROCEEE. It also shows the distribution of the collateral resources established as a target for 2013, in the light of the macroeconomic scenario in December 2012.

 

 

F - 56


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Assets managed by Fundação CESP:

   

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

Target December 31, 2013

Fixed rate

 

72%

 

68%

 

72%

Shares - CPFL Energia

 

6%

 

6%

 

6%

Other shares

 

17%

 

21%

 

17%

Real state

 

3%

 

3%

 

3%

Other

 

2%

 

2%

 

2%

Total

 

100%

 

100%

 

100%

             

Assets managed by ELETROCEEE:

             
             
   

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

Target December 31, 2013

Fixed income investments

 

63%

 

65%

 

61%

Variable income

 

23%

 

24%

 

20%

Structured investments

 

13%

 

9%

 

15%

Other

 

1%

 

2%

 

4%

Total

 

100%

 

100%

 

100%

 

The allocation target for 2013 was based on the recommendations for allocation of assets made at the end of 2012 by Fundação CESP, in its Investment Policy. This target may change at any time during 2013, in the light of changes in the macroeconomic situation or in the return on assets, among other factors.

The asset management aims to maximize the return on investments, while seeking to minimize the risks of an actuarial deficit. Investments are therefore always made bearing in mind the liabilities that have to be honored. One of the main tools used by Fundação CESP to achieve its management objectives is ALM (Asset Liability Management – Joint Management of Assets and Liabilities), performed at least once a year, for a horizon of more than 10 years. ALM also assists in studying the liquidity of the pension plans, taking into consideration the benefit payment flow in relation to liquid assets. ELETROCEEE also uses ALM.

The basis for determining the assumptions of estimated general return on the assets is supported by ALM. The main assumptions are macroeconomic projections for calculating the anticipated long-term profitability, taking into account the current benefit plan portfolios. ALM processes the ideal average long-term allocation of the plan’s assets and the estimated profitability in the long term is based on this allocation and on the assumptions of the assets’ profitability.

Investment risk

Brazilian pension funds are subject to restrictions on investments in foreign assets. The major part of the resources of the Company’s benefit plans is invested in the fixed income segment and, within this segment, the greater part of the funds is invested in federal government bonds, indexed to the IGP, which is the index for adjustment of the actuarial liabilities of the Company’s plans (defined benefit plans).

Management of the Company’s benefit plans is monitored by the Investment and Pension Management Committee, which includes representatives of active and retired employees, as well as members appointed by the Company. Among the duties of the Committee are the analysis and approval of investment recommendations made by the Fundação CESP investment managers.

In addition to controlling market risks by the unplanned divergence methodology, as required by law, Fundação CESP uses the following tools to control market risks in the fixed income and variable income segments: VaR, Tracking Risk, Tracking Error and Stress Test.

Fundação CESP's Investment Policy imposes additional restrictions (beyond those established by law) which define the percentage of diversification for investments in assets issued or underwritten by the same legal entity, internally.

 

F - 57


 
 

Table of Contents

 

( 18 )  REGULATORY CHARGES

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

Fee for the Use of Water Resources

2,102

 

3,591

Global Reverse Fund - RGR

24,653

 

28,060

ANEEL Inspection Fee

2,555

 

2,495

Fuel Consumption Account - CCC

34,432

 

65,121

Energy Development Account - CDE

50,745

 

45,879

Total

114,488

 

145,146

 

( 19 )  TAXES AND SOCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS PAYABLE

 

   

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

Current

       

ICMS (State VAT)

 

171,672

 

300,518

PIS (Tax on Revenue)

 

14,153

 

12,446

COFINS (Tax on Revenue)

 

79,286

 

59,429

IRPJ (Corporate Income Tax)

 

104,627

 

71,531

CSLL (Social Contribution Tax)

 

37,769

 

18,589

Other

 

34,859

 

20,515

Total

 

442,365

 

483,028

Noncurrent

       

COFINS (Tax on Revenue)

 

-

 

165

 

( 20 )  PROVISION FOR TAX, CIVIL AND LABOR RISKS AND ESCROW DEPOSITS

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

Provision for tax, civil and labor risks

 

Escrow Deposits

 

Provision for tax, civil and labor risks

 

Escrow Deposits

Labor

             

Various

68,505

 

152,765

 

43,850

 

191,221

               

Civil

             

General Damages

15,049

 

115,272

 

13,114

 

95,429

Tariff Increase

5,877

 

45,118

 

8,948

 

31,242

Other

6,203

 

448

 

6,423

 

448

 

27,130

 

160,837

 

28,485

 

127,119

Tax

             

FINSOCIAL

18,968

 

54,074

 

18,930

 

53,964

Income Tax

90,187

 

704,742

 

82,061

 

660,222

Interest on Shareholders’ Equity - PIS and COFINS

12,517

 

12,517

 

11,713

 

11,713

PIS and COFINS - Non-Cumulative Method

94,677

 

-

 

91,477

 

-

Other

47,033

 

81,212

 

44,580

 

68,370

 

263,382

 

852,545

 

248,761

 

794,268

               

Various

27,062

 

18,408

 

17,027

 

16,008

               

Total

386,079

 

1,184,554

 

338,121

 

1,128,616

 

F - 58


 
 

Table of Contents

 

The changes in the provisions for contingencies and escrow deposits are shown below:

 

 

December
31, 2011

 

Addition

 

Reversal

 

Payment

 

Monetary
Adjustment

 

Business Combination

 

December
31, 2012

   

Labor

43,850

 

67,695

 

(2,890)

 

(40,160)

 

11

 

-

 

68,505

   

Civil

28,485

 

26,625

 

(4,095)

 

(23,924)

 

38

 

-

 

27,130

   

Tax

248,761

 

9,261

 

(1,406)

 

-

 

6,766

 

-

 

263,382

   

Other

17,027

 

35

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

10,000

 

27,062

   

Provision for tax, civil and labor risks

338,121  

 

103,617

 

(8,391)

 

(64,084)

 

6,815

 

10,000

 

386,079

   

Escrow Deposits

1,128,616

 

144,210

 

(15,606)

 

(125,048)

 

52,382

 

-

 

1,184,554

   
                               
                               

December
31, 2010

Addition

Reversal

Payment

Monetary
Adjustment

Business Combination

Other

December
31, 2011

Labor

39,136

 

17,868

 

(3,586)

 

(9,940)

 

-

 

372

 

-

 

43,850

Civil

27,843

 

16,653

 

(6,438)

 

(9,574)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

28,485

Tax

219,513

 

18,284

 

(269)

 

-

 

10,444

 

93

 

695

 

248,761

Other

4,773

 

13,950

 

-

 

(1,743)

 

47

 

-

 

-

 

17,027

Provision for tax, civil and labor risks

291,265  

 

66,755

 

(10,293)

 

(21,257)

 

10,491

 

465

 

695

 

338,121

Escrow Deposits

890,685

 

192,881

 

(8,064)

 

(12,113)

 

64,516

 

12

 

699

 

1,128,616

                               
                               
 

December
31, 2009

 

Addition

 

Reversal

 

Payment

 

Monetary
Adjustment

 

Other

 

December
31, 2010

   

Labor

42,752

 

28,769

 

(2,866)

 

(29,504)

 

-

 

(15)

 

39,136

   

Civil

27,974

 

9,402

 

(5,512)

 

(4,019)

 

-

 

(1)

 

27,843

   

Tax

223,779

 

31,393

 

(40,098)

 

(22)

 

4,445

 

16

 

219,513

   

Other

6,139

 

-

 

-

 

(1,659)

 

293

 

-

 

4,773

   

Reserve for Contingencies

300,644

 

69,564

 

(48,476)

 

(35,204)

 

4,738

 

-

 

291,265

   

Escrow Deposits

794,177

 

80,226

 

(13,737)

 

(14,380)

 

44,398

 

-

 

890,685

   

 

 

The provision for tax, civil and labor risks were based on assessment of the risks of losing litigation to which the Company and its subsidiaries are parties, where a loss is probable in the opinion of the legal advisers and the Management of the Company and its subsidiaries.

The principal pending issues relating to litigation, legal cases and tax assessments are summarized below:

a)             Labor: The main labor suits relate to claims filed by former employees or unions for additional salary payments (overtime, salary parity, severance payments and other claims).

b)            Civil: 

Bodily injury - mainly  refer to claims for indemnities relating to accidents in the subsidiaries' electrical grids, damage to consumers, vehicle accidents, etc.

Tariff increase - Corresponds to various claims by industrial consumers as a result of tariff increases imposed by DNAEE Ordinances 38 and 45, on February 27 and March 4, 1986, when the “Plano Cruzado” economic plan price freeze was in effect.

c)         Tax: 

FINSOCIAL - relates to legal challenges of the rate increase and collection of FINSOCIAL during the period June 1989 to October 1991.

Income Tax The provision of R$ 70,291  (R$ 61,852 in 2011 and R$ 53,356 in 2010) recognized by the subsidiary CPFL Piratininga refers to the lawsuit in relation to the tax deductibility of CSLL in determination of corporate income tax - IRPJ.

PIS and COFINS - JCP in 2009, the Company dropped its suit  disputing PIS and COFINS charged on Interest on shareholders’ equity  received, and paid the amounts in question, taking advantage of the benefits granted in Law n° 11,941/09 (REFIS IV), that is, an amnesty on the fine and legal charges and a reduction in interest. The Company is awaiting finalization of the legal procedures in order to offset the escrow deposits of the amounts.

PIS and COFINS – Non-cumulative method refers to the tax disputes in relation to the non-cumulative levying of PIS and COFINS on certain sector charges.  

Other - tax - Refers to other suits in progress at the judicial and administrative levels resulting from of the subsidiaries' operations, in relation to INSS, FGTS and SAT tax issues.

 

F - 59


 
 

Table of Contents

 

d)    Possible losses: the Company and its subsidiaries are parties to other suits in which Management, supported by its legal advisers, believes that the chances of a successful outcome are possible, due to a solid defensive position in these cases. It is not yet possible to predict the outcome of the courts’ decisions or any other decisions in similar proceedings considered probable or remote. Consequently, no provision has been established for these. The claims relating to possible losses, at December 31, 2012, were as follows: (i) R$ 330,001 labor (R$ 340,833 in 2011 and R$ 341,068 in 2010) related mainly to workplace accidents, risk premium, overtime, etc; (ii) R$ 628,381 civil, are related mainly to bodily injury, environmental impacts and tariff increases (R$ 553,648 in 2011 and R$ 604,603 in 2010); and (iii) R$ 1,513,632 tax, related mainly to Income tax, ICMS, FINSOCIAL and PIS and COFINS (R$ 967,952 in 2011 and R$ 823,872 in 2010).

Based on the opinion of their legal advisers, Management of the Company and its subsidiaries consider that there are no significant contingent risks that are not covered by adequate provisions in the financial statements, or that might result in a significant impact on future earnings.

Escrow deposits: income tax: of the total amount of R$ 704,742, R$ 617,051 (R$ 581,721 at December 31, 2011) refers to the dispute on the deductibility for federal tax purposes of expense recognized in 1997 in respect of the welfare deficit of the subsidiary CPFL Paulista's employees’ pension plan in relation to Fundação CESP, due to the renegotiation and renewal of debt in that year. On consulting the Brazilian Federal tax authority, the subsidiary obtained a favorable reply in Note MF/SRF/COSIT/GAB nº 157, of April 9, 1998, and took advantage of the tax deductibility of the expense, thereby generating a tax loss for that year. As a result of this measure, the subsidiary was assessed by the tax inspectors and, as a condition for continuing the discussions in two cases, court decisions required escrow deposits in guarantee. The deductibility resulted in other assessments and in order to be able to continue the discussions, the subsidiary offered collateral in the form of bank guarantees amounting to R$ 257,237. Based on the updated position of the legal counsel in charge of the case and Management’s opinion the risk of loss continues to be classified as remote.

 

( 21 )  PUBLIC UTILITIES

 

Companies

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

Number of remaining installments

 

Interest rates

CERAN

 

79,813

 

75,472

 

279

 

IGP-M + 9,6% p.a.

ENERCAN

 

12,817

 

10,782

 

269

 

IGP-M + 8% p.a.

BAESA

 

60,392

 

57,734

 

281

 

IGP-M + 8% p.a.

Foz do Chapecó

 

338,556

 

325,676

 

287

 

IGP-M / IPC-A + 5,3% p.a.

TOTAL

 

491,579

 

469,664

       
                 

Current

 

30,422

 

28,738

       

Noncurrent

 

461,157

 

440,926

       

 

( 22 )  OTHER ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

 

 

F - 60


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

Current

 

Noncurrent

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

Consumers and Concessionaires

60,243

 

66,284

 

-

 

-

Energy Efficiency Program - PEE

168,520

 

122,601

 

11,772

 

4,369

Research & Development - P&D

137,455

 

139,247

 

30,458

 

22,370

National Scientific and Technological Development Fund - FNDCT

5,102

 

4,014

 

-

 

-

Energy Research Company - EPE

2,550

 

1,648

 

-

 

-

Fund for Reversal

-

 

-

 

17,750

 

17,750

Advances

28,071

 

74,292

 

20

 

2,812

Provision for environmental expenditure

5,307

 

35,617

 

53,859

 

80,272

Payroll

13,034

 

14,609

 

-

 

-

Profit sharing

49,396

 

42,058

 

7,846

 

5,366

Collections agreement (note 11)

76,371

 

70,096

 

-

 

-

Guarantees

-

 

-

 

25,014

 

26,605

Accounts payable - business acquisitions

11,369

 

174,136

 

-

 

-

Other

73,624

 

68,735

 

2,381

 

14,866

Total

631,043

 

813,338

 

149,099

 

174,411

 

Consumers and concessionaires: refers to liabilities in connection with bills paid twice and adjustments of billing to be offset or returned to consumers as well the participation of consumers in the “Programa de Universalização” program.

Research and Development and Energy Efficiency Programs:  The subsidiaries recognized liabilities relating to amounts already billed in tariffs (1% of Net Operating Revenue), but not yet invested in the Research and Development and Energy Efficiency Programs.  These amounts are subject to monthly restatement at the SELIC rate, to realization. 

Provision for environmental expense: in noncurrent, the amount of R$ 46,215 refers to provisions recorded by the indirect subsidiary CPFL Renováveis in relation to socio-environmental licenses and as a result of events that have already occurred. Such costs are recorded against fixed assets while the projects are under construction, and recognized directly in profit or loss after start-up.

 

Profit-sharing: Mainly comprised by:

(i)   in accordance with a collective labor agreement, the Company and its subsidiaries introduced an employee profit-sharing program, based on achievement of operating and financial targets established in advance;

(ii)   Long-Term Incentive Program: In July 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Long-Term Incentive Program for Executives, consisting of a plan to grant Phantom Stock Options and awards in funds, in accordance with the appreciation of the Company’s shares in relation to an amount calculated annually.

The plan will run from 2012 to 2018 and certain Company executives who are exercising their duties on the grant date will be eligible. The grant is annual and the vesting period for conversion into premiums will be from the second, third or fourth year after the grant date, with an option for 1/3 of the shares per year or carrying the balance over to the following year.

The fair value of the instruments granted was calculated by the discounted cash flow method based on the budget predictions approved by Management, including the planned distribution of dividends, resulting in R$ 24.16 per share.

The conversion amount (fair value) will be based on the weighted average of the Company’s quoted shares (CPFE3) on the BM&FBOVESPA in the last 45 trading sessions as from the last business day of December of the year prior to the conversion. They may only be converted into awards in cash after a target of a minimum of 80% appreciation of the target set has been reached, up to a ceiling of 150%.

A liability of R$ 3,054 was recognized under Profit Sharing in 2012 for the fair value of the shares, set against personnel expense. This amount corresponds to 297,667 phantom stocks granted in 2012, of which 1/3 (99,222 shares) can be converted into awards from the second year after the granting date (fiscal year of 2014), provided the share appreciation target has been reached.

Accounts payable - business acquisitions: Relates to the amount recognized by the indirect subsidiary CPFL Renováveis for business acquisitions.

 

 

F - 61


 
 

Table of Contents

 

( 23 )  SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY

 

The shareholders’ interest in the Company’s equity as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 are shown below:

 

   

Number of shares

   

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

Shareholders

 

Common Shares

 

Interest %

 

Common Shares

 

Interest %

BB Carteira Livre I FIA

 

288,569,602

 

29.99

 

298,467,458

 

31.02

Caixa de Previdência dos Funcionários do Banco do Brasil - Previ

 

9,897,860

 

1.03

 

-

 

-

VBC Energia S.A.

 

9,897,860

 

1.03

 

245,897,454

 

25.55

Camargo Correa S.A.

 

12,642,390

 

1.31

 

837,860

 

0.09

ESC Energia S.A.

 

224,195,070

 

23.30

 

-

 

-

Energia São Paulo FIP

 

115,118,250

 

11.96

 

102,756,048

 

10.68

Bonaire Participações S.A.

 

6,308,790

 

0.66

 

18,670,990

 

1.94

BNDES Participações S.A.

 

81,053,460

 

8.42

 

81,053,460

 

8.42

Brumado Holdings S.A.

 

34,502,100

 

3.59

 

34,502,100

 

3.59

Antares Holding LTDA

 

16,039,720

 

1.67

 

16,039,720

 

1.67

Board of Directors

 

-

 

-

 

212

 

0.00

Executive officers

 

47,610

 

0.00

 

49,980

 

0.01

Other

 

164,001,548

 

17.04

 

163,998,978

 

17.04

Total

 

962,274,260

 

100.00

 

962,274,260

 

100.00

 

23.1 - Capital reserves:

The amount of R$ 228,306 refers to the entry resulting from the CPFL Renováveis business combination.

23.2 – Profit reserves:

Is comprised of:

(a)   Earnings retained for investment: The Company records restatement of the financial asset in profit or loss for the year. Since this income will only materialize at the time of compensation (at the end of the concession), the Company is proposing to retain it as a reserve for investments;

 

(b)   Legal reserve, amounting to R$ 556,481.

23.3 – Other comprehensive income – deemed cost:

Relates to the recognition at the initial adoption of IFRS of the deemed cost to the property, plant and equipment of the generators.

 

23.4 – Change in the participation of the controlling shareholders:

 

In 2012, the Company’s controlling shareholders made certain corporate transactions that resulted in the transfer, to their respective subsidiaries and parent companies, of some of the shares issued by the Company:

 

·       Bonaire Participações S.A. (“Bonaire”):

 

The corporate restructuring of the shareholder Bonaire, whereby 12,362,202 of the CPFL Energia’s shares were transferred from Bonaire to its shareholder Energia São Paulo Fundo de Investimento em Ações (“Energia São Paulo FIA”), was finalized in the first quarter of 2012. Consequently, the final number of the CPFL Energia ’s shares held by the shareholders Bonaire and Energia São Paulo FIA was 6,308,790 and 115,118,250, respectively.

 

·       VBC Energia S.A. (“VBC”):

 

The shareholder VBC underwent corporate restructuring in the fourth quarter of 2012, resulting in the transfer of 224,195,070 of the CPFL Energia’s shares to its subsidiary ESC Energia S.A. (“ESC”) and 11,804,530 CPFL Energia ‘s shares to Camargo Corrêa S.A. (“CCSA”). Consequently, the final number of the CPFL Energia’s shares held by the shareholders VBC, ESC and CCSA was 9,897,860, 224,195,070 and 12,642,390, respectively.

 

F - 62


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

·       BB Carteira Livre I FIA (“BB CL I”):

 

The shareholder BB CL I underwent corporate restructuring in the fourth quarter of 2012, resulting in the transfer of 9,897,860 of the CPFL Energia’s shares to its parent company, Caixa de Previdência dos Funcionários do Banco do Brasil (“Previ”). Consequently, the final number of the CPFL Energia’s shares held by the shareholders BB CL I and Previ was 288,569,602 e 9,897,860, respectively.

 

23.5 – Dividends:

The Annual and Extraordinary General Meeting (AGM/EGM) held on April 12, 2012 approved the allocation of net income for the year for 2011 and declared dividends of R$ 1,506,179, of which R$ 747,709 relate to the interim dividend declared in June 2011, plus an additional dividend of R$ 758,470.

 

On August 6, 2012, in accordance with the by-laws and based on the income for the first half-year of 2012, the Board of Directors approved the declaration of an interim dividend of R$ 640,239, attributing the amount of R$ 0.665339515 to each share.

The Company paid R$ 1,393,507 in 2012 in respect of the dividends declared at December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012.

 

23.6 - Allocation of Net Income for the Year:

The Company’s by-laws assure shareholders of a minimum dividend of 25% of net income, adjusted in accordance with the law.

For this year, Management is proposing distribution of the balance of the net income, by declaration of R$455,906 in the form of dividends, corresponding to R$ 0,473778718 per share, as shown below:

 

Net income - Parent company

 

1,225,924

Prior year profit or loss (note 2.8)

 

227,118

Realization of comprehensive income

 

27,378

Prescribed Dividend

 

3,921

Earnings retained for investment

 

(326,900)

Net Income Base for Allocation

 

1,157,440

Constitution of Legal Reserve

 

(61,296)

Interim Dividend

 

(640,239)

Additional proposed dividend

 

455,906

 

( 24 )  EARNINGS PER SHARE

 

Earnings per share – basic and diluted

Calculation of the basic and diluted earnings per share at December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was based on the net income attributable to controlling shareholders and the average weighted number of common shares outstanding during the years. For the diluted earnings per share, it was considered the dilutive effects of instruments convertible into shares, as shown below:

 

F - 63


 
 

Table of Contents

 

   

December 31,
2012

 

December 31,
2011 (¹)

 

December 31,
2010 (¹)

             

Net income per share - basic

           

Numerator

         

Net income attributable to controlling shareholders

 

1,225,924 

1,572,292

1,595,151

Denominator

       

Weighted average shares outstanding during the year

 

962,274,260 

962,274,260

961,494,872

Net income per share - basic

 

1.27 

1.63

1.66

         

Net income per share - diluted

       

Numerator

       

Net income attributable to controlling shareholders

 

1,225,924 

1,572,292

1,595,151

Dilutive effect of convertible debentures of subsidiary CPFL Renováveis (*)

 

(17,537) 

-

-

Net income attributable to the Controlling Shareholders

 

1,208,386 

1,572,292

 

1,595,151

Denominator

           

Weighted average shares outstanding during the year

 

962,274,260 

 

962,274,260

 

961,494,872

Net income per share - diluted

 

1.26 

 

1.63

 

1.66

             

(*) Proportional to the interest on the subsidiary (63%)

   

(¹) Includes the effects describer in note 2.8.

           

 

The dilutive effect of the numerator in the calculation of diluted earnings per share takes into account the dilutive effects of the debentures convertible into shares issued by subsidiaries of the indirectly controlled entity CPFL Renováveis. Calculation of the effects was based on the assumption that these debentures would be converted into common shares of the subsidiaries at the beginning of the year.

 

In the second quarter of 2011, the Company’s common shares were grouped, at a proportion of 10 (ten) to 1 (one), with simultaneous splitting of each grouped share, at a proportion of 1 (one) to 20 (twenty), allowing a period of 60 days for the shareholders to adjust their stock positions on the BM&FBOVESPA. This transaction did not involve any changes in financial resources and accordingly was considered in calculation of the weighted average number of shares as if it had occurred on January 1, 2010, in accordance with IAS 33 Earnings per share.

The shares resulting from the operation were attributed and registered to the share owners on July 4, 2011, and the share fractions of the shareholders who opted not to adjust their positions were identified, separated and grouped in whole numbers and sold at auction at BM&FBOVESPA.

 

( 25 )  OPERATING REVENUE

 

 

F - 64


 
 

Table of Contents

 

   

Number of Consumers (*)

 

GWh (*)

 

R$ thousand

Revenue from Eletric Energy Operations

 

2012 

 

2011

 

2010

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

Consumer class

                                   

Residential

 

6,312,737

 

6,086,847

 

5,880,204

 

14,567

 

13,626

 

12,983

 

6,631,596

 

5,978,836

 

5,416,581

Industrial

 

59,057

 

59,485

 

78,261

 

14,536

 

14,718

 

15,413

 

4,086,080

 

4,128,340

 

4,123,723

Commercial

 

494,556

 

500,131

 

490,554

 

8,714

 

8,140

 

7,695

 

3,389,159

 

3,086,196

 

2,795,127

Rural

 

243,283

 

242,554

 

237,903

 

2,093

 

1,991

 

2,100

 

492,633

 

452,467

 

434,519

Public Administration

 

48,467

 

46,771

 

45,386

 

1,220

 

1,154

 

1,112

 

451,241

 

420,474

 

384,742

Public Lighting

 

9,166

 

8,616

 

8,096

 

1,525

 

1,495

 

1,444

 

345,058

 

328,882

 

303,862

Public Services

 

7,729

 

7,413

 

7,239

 

1,864

 

1,823

 

1,742

 

543,216

 

511,560

 

470,323

(-) Adjustment of excess and surplus revenue of reactive

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(24,643)

 

-

 

-

Billed

 

7,174,995

 

6,951,817

 

6,747,643

 

44,519

 

42,946

 

42,489

 

15,914,341

 

14,906,755

 

13,928,877

Own comsuption

             

33

 

33

 

33

 

-

 

-

 

-

Unbilled (Net)

             

-

 

-

 

-

 

136,905

 

(40,671)

 

1,304

Emergency Charges - ECE/EAEE

             

-

 

-

 

-

 

1

 

18

 

7

Reclassification to Network Usage Charge - TUSD - Captive Consumers

             

-

 

-

 

-

 

(7,558,153)

 

(7,213,990)

 

(5,843,561)

Electricity sales to final consumers

             

44,552

 

42,979

 

42,522

 

8,493,094

 

7,652,112

 

8,086,627

                                     

Furnas Centrais Elétricas S.A.

             

3,034

 

3,026

 

3,026

 

411,798

 

386,776

 

347,472

Other Concessionaires and Licensees

             

9,505

 

6,832

 

7,217

 

1,618,658

 

820,652

 

731,493

Current Electric Energy

             

2,675

 

4,279

 

2,495

 

233,056

 

90,419

 

117,156

Electricity sales to wholesaler´s

             

15,214

 

14,137

 

12,738

 

2,263,513

 

1,297,846

 

1,196,121

                                     

Revenue due to Network Usage Charge - TUSD - Captive Consumers

                         

7,558,153  

 

7,213,990

 

5,843,561

Revenue due to Network Usage Charge - TUSD - Free Consumers

                         

1,412,275  

 

1,321,111

 

1,127,795

(-) Adjustment of revenue surplus and excess responsive

                         

(7,489) 

 

-

 

-

Revenue from construction of concession infrastructure

                         

1,351,550  

 

1,129,826

 

1,043,678

Other Revenue and Income

                         

351,178

 

251,097

 

258,896

Other operating revenues

                         

10,665,668

 

9,916,025

 

8,273,930

Total gross revenues

                         

21,422,274

 

18,865,982

 

17,556,678

Deductions from operating revenues

                                   

ICMS

                         

(3,178,771)

 

(2,967,625)

 

(2,728,416)

PIS

                         

(297,796)

 

(282,915)

 

(265,444)

COFINS

                         

(1,369,388)

 

(1,303,411)

 

(1,224,934)

ISS

                         

(4,926)

 

(5,031)

 

(3,847)

Global Reversal Reserve - RGR

                         

(101,136)

 

(72,027)

 

(53,985)

Fuel Consumption Account - CCC

                         

(597,925)

 

(737,017)

 

(593,630)

Energy Development Account - CDE

                         

(584,035)

 

(524,844)

 

(470,981)

Research and Development and Energy Efficiency Programs

                         

(155,169) 

 

(143,916)

 

(134,772)

PROINFA

                         

(77,886)

 

(65,125)

 

(56,933)

Emergency Charges - ECE/EAEE

                         

(1)

 

(19)

 

(7)

IPI

                         

(94)

 

(24)

 

-

 

                         

(6,367,127)

 

(6,101,954)

 

(5,532,949)

 

                                   

Net revenue

                         

15,055,147

 

12,764,028

 

12,023,729

(*) Unaudited information.

                                   

 

In accordance with ANEEL’s Order nº 4.722 of December 18, 2009, concerning the basic procedures for preparation of the financial statements, the energy distribution subsidiaries reclassified part of the amount related to revenue from under the heading “Electricity sales to final consumers”, Commercialization activities, to “Other operating revenues”, Distribution activities, with the title “Revenue due to Network Usage Charge - TUSD captive consumers”.

 

The tariff regulation procedure (Proret), approved by ANEEL Normative Resolution n° 463 of November 22, 2011, determined that revenue received as a result of excess demand and excess reactive power, from the contractual tariff review date for the 3rd periodic tariff review, should be accounted for as Special Obligations and will be amortized from the next tariff review.

 

In accordance with ANEEL Order nº 4.991, of December 29, 2011, relating to the basic procedures for preparation of the financial statements, the subsidiaries CPFL Piratininga, CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Leste Paulista, CPFL Sul Paulista, CPFL Jaguari e CPFL Mococa adjusted revenue of excess and surplus revenue of reactive, reducing the accounts of “Electricity sales to final consumers” and “Revenue due to Network Usage Charge - TUSD free consumers” against the item reducing of intangible assets (“Special Obligations”). The amount of R$ 32,132 recognized was calculated from the date that should have occurred, the subsidiary’s tariff review to December 31, 2012.

 

On February 7, 2012, the Brazilian Association of Electric Energy Distributors (Associação Brasileira de Distribuidores de Energia Elétrica - ABRADEE) succeeded in suspending the effects of Resolution 463, whereby the request for advance final relief was granted and the order to account for income from excess demand and excess reactive as special obligations was suspended The suspensive effect applied for by ANEEL in its interlocutory appeal was granted in June 2012 and the advance relief originally granted in favor of ABRADEE was suspended The subsidiaries are awaiting the court’s decision on the final treatment of this income, and at December 31, 2012, these amounts are still recorded under Special Obligations, according to IAS 37.

 

The details of the tariff adjustments for the distributors are as follows:

 

F - 65


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

       

2012

 

2011

 

2010

Company

 

Month

 

Total adjustment

 

Effect perceived by consumers (*)

 

Total adjustment

 

Effect perceived by consumers (*)

 

Total adjustment

 

Effect perceived by consumers (*)

CPFL Paulista

 

April

 

3.71%

 

2.89%

 

7.38%

 

7.23%

 

2.70%

 

-5.69%

CPFL Piratininga

 

October

 

8.79%

 

5.50%

 

(**)

 

(**)

 

10.11%

 

5.66%

RGE

 

June

 

11.51%

 

3.38%

 

17.21%

 

6.74%

 

12.37%

 

3.96%

CPFL Santa Cruz

 

February

 

(***)

 

(***)

 

23.61%

 

15.38%

 

10.09%

 

-2.53%

CPFL Leste Paulista

 

February

 

(***)

 

(***)

 

7.76%

 

16.44%

 

-13.21%

 

-8.47%

CPFL Jaguari

 

February

 

(***)

 

(***)

 

5.47%

 

6.62%

 

5.16%

 

3.67%

CPFL Sul Paulista

 

February

 

(***)

 

(***)

 

8.02%

 

7.11%

 

5.66%

 

4.94%

CPFL Mococa

 

February

 

(***)

 

(***)

 

9.50%

 

9.77%

 

3.98%

 

3.24%

 

(*)    Represents the average effect perceived by consumers, in accordance with ANEEL resolutions, as a result of elimination from the tariff base of financial components added in the annual adjustment for the previous year.

 

(**)   On July 12, 2012, ANEEL opened the Public Hearing nº 54/2012 to obtain information for the 2011 Periodic Tariff Review - RTP of the subsidiary CPFL Piratininga and proposed a total tariff repositioning of  -5.04%, of which -3.40% relates to the economic repositioning and -1.64% to the financial components. After analysis agents’ comments, ANEEL formulated the final proposal, approved at the Board of Directors’ Meeting on October 2, 2012, with a total repositioning of -5.43%, of which -4.45% relates to the economic repositioning and -0.98% to the financial components. This result was used as a basis for calculation of the 2012 Annual Tariff Readjustment.

 

On October 16, 2012 ANEEL’s Collegiate Board of Directors approved the 2012 Annual Tariff Review – RTA, of the subsidiary CPFL Piratininga. Tariffs were increased by 8.79%, on average, of which 7.71% relates to the economic increase and 1.08% to the financial components. The 2012 RTA took into consideration the impact of 1/3 of the financial component of the 2011 RTP, which represents a reduction of 2.42%. If this effect had not been taken into account, the total increase of the 2012 RTA would have been 11.21%. With the ratification of the 2011 RTP and 2012 RTA, the average effect to be perceived by consumers is 5.50% in relation to the tariffs ratified by the 2010 Annual Tariff Adjustment. The new tariffs are effective from October 23, 2012 to October 22, 2013.

 

(***) On January 31, 2012, with Authorization Resolutions 1,253, 1,254, 1,255, 1,256 and 1,258, ANEEL extended the effective term of the supply tariffs and TUSD of the subsidiaries CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Leste Paulista, CPFL Jaguari, CPFL Sul Paulista and CPFL Mococa, respectively, until the final processing of the tariff review.

 

The Periodic Tariff Review - RTP of February 2012 was only ratified in January 2013, but without immediate application of the tariffs, as the Extraordinary Tariff Review – RTE of January 2013 encompassed the effects of the 2012 RTP. The difference in revenue will be offset in the annual Tariff Review – RTA of Feburary 2013 by means of a financial component.

 

 

 

 

 

F - 66


 
 

Table of Contents

 

( 26 )  COST OF ELECTRIC ENERGY

 

   

GWh (*)

 

R$ mil

Electricity Purchased for Resale

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

Itaipu Binacional

 

10,781

 

10,855

 

10,835

 

1,131,744

 

973,487

 

1,010,132

Current electric energy

 

8,656

 

5,002

 

3,373

 

353,243

 

142,450

 

198,789

PROINFA

 

1,070

 

1,032

 

1,133

 

215,400

 

169,144

 

182,674

Energy purchased of bilateral contracts and through action in the regulated market

 

39,745

 

33,964

 

37,043

 

5,068,460

 

4,117,550

 

4,166,943

Credit of PIS and COFINS

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(617,229)

 

(495,495)

 

(508,463)

Subtotal

 

60,252

 

50,853

 

52,384

 

6,151,617

 

4,907,136

 

5,050,075

                         

Electricity Network Usage Charge

                       

Basic Network Charges

             

1,161,841

 

1,019,116

 

899,112

Transmission from Itaipu

             

96,454

 

90,140

 

88,568

Connection Charges

             

80,030

 

71,601

 

68,985

Charges of Use of the Distribution System

             

53,959

 

42,052

 

30,217

System Service Charges - ESS

             

252,708

 

187,056

 

174,230

Reserve Energy charges

             

85,148

 

34,547

 

32,281

Credit of PIS and COFINS

             

(155,779) 

 

(130,679)

 

(120,978)

Subtotal

             

1,574,362

 

1,313,834

 

1,172,415

                         

Total

             

7,725,980

 

6,220,970

 

6,222,490

(*) Unaudited information.

                       

 

 

F - 67


 
 

Table of Contents

 

( 27 )  OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES

 

 

Operating costs

Services Rendered to Third Parties

Operating Expenses

Total

Sales

 

General

 

Other

   

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

Personnel

 

422,381

 

413,587

 

351,447

 

30

 

(2)

 

279

 

104,343

 

99,988

 

80,013

 

180,328

 

190,423

 

161,878

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

707,082

 

703,997

 

593,617

Employee Pension Plans

 

(16,340)

 

(82,953)

 

(80,629)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(16,340)

 

(82,953)

 

(80,629)

Materials

 

203,735

 

62,213

 

62,175

 

1,757

 

4,741

 

2,368

 

2,965

 

4,799

 

4,402

 

9,261

 

23,056

 

11,678

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

217,718

 

94,807

 

80,623

Outside Services

 

182,061

 

167,170

 

199,065

 

2,356

 

4,069

 

2,358

 

107,603

 

107,748

 

84,488

 

262,635

 

252,033

 

181,493

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

554,655

 

531,020

 

467,404

Depreciation and Amortization

 

766,263

 

534,763

 

475,647

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

33,046

 

34,139

 

9,212

 

41,786

 

46,867

 

24,167

 

-

 

-

 

152

 

841,095

 

615,769

 

509,178

Costs related to infrastructure construction

 

-  

 

-

 

-

 

1,351,550

 

1,129,826

 

1,043,678

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,351,550

 

1,129,826

 

1,043,678

Other

 

62,212

 

63,190

 

59,788

 

(18)

 

(7)

 

2,297

 

220,388

 

117,678

 

122,320

 

238,814

 

102,792

 

63,996

 

380,899

 

216,392

 

199,652

 

902,296

 

500,045

 

448,053

Collection charges

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

49,053

 

39,499

 

55,910

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

49,053

 

39,499

 

55,910

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

163,903

 

70,673

 

51,668

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

163,903

 

70,673

 

51,668

Leases and Rentals

 

28,709

 

15,878

 

15,068

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

88

 

147

 

1,676

 

9,492

 

9,597

 

9,764

 

-

 

-

 

13

 

38,290

 

25,623

 

26,521

Publicity and Advertising

 

106

 

13

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

26

 

26

 

-

 

22,604

 

10,926

 

21,894

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

22,736

 

10,965

 

21,894

Legal, Judicial and Indemnities

 

50

 

39

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

187,578

 

59,167

 

5,416

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

187,628

 

59,206

 

5,416

Donations, Contributions and Subsidies

 

1,229

 

105

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

5,914

 

5,801

 

-

 

2,402

 

4,865

 

6,216

 

-

 

-

 

27

 

9,546

 

10,772

 

6,243

Financial compensation for water resources utilization

 

18,263

 

23,782

 

24,045

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

18,263

 

23,782

 

24,045

Inspection fee

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

32,592

 

28,974

 

24,769

 

32,592

 

28,974

 

24,769

Loss/(gain) on disposal and decommissioning and other losses on noncurrent asstes

 

6,276

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

48,303

 

1,968

 

(11,308)

 

54,579

 

1,968

 

(11,308)

Intangible of concession amortization

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

286,008

 

185,434

 

182,615

 

286,008

 

185,434

 

182,615

Other

 

7,579

 

23,372

 

20,675

 

(18)

 

(7)

 

2,297

 

1,403

 

1,532

 

13,066

 

16,738

 

18,237

 

20,706

 

13,997

 

16

 

3,536

 

39,699

 

43,150

 

60,280

Total

 

1,620,312

 

1,157,970

 

1,067,493

 

1,355,675

 

1,138,626

 

1,050,980

 

468,345

 

364,352

 

300,435

 

732,823

 

615,171

 

443,212

 

380,899

 

216,392

 

199,804

 

4,558,055

 

3,492,512

 

3,061,924

 

 

 

F - 68


 
 

Table of Contents

 

( 28 )  FINANCIAL INCOME AND EXPENSES

 

 

2012

 

2011 (¹)

 

2010 (¹)

Financial Income

         

Income from Financial Investments

211,338

 

356,413

 

156,420

Arrears of interest and fines

167,349

 

159,277

 

136,181

Restatement of tax credits

9,944

 

8,649

 

7,789

Restatement of Escrow Deposits

52,382

 

64,516

 

44,366

Monetary and Exchange adjustment 

49,437

 

57,139

 

42,548

Adjustment to expected cash flow (note 10)

159,195

 

63,212

 

82,636

Discount on purchase of ICMS credit

18,917

 

14,588

 

7,806

PIS and COFINS of Interest on Shareholders' Equity

(19,218)

 

(18,926)

 

(18,253)

Other

70,989

 

56,532

 

106,258

Total

720,332

 

761,400

 

565,751

           

Financial Expense

         

Debt Charges

(1,220,199)

 

(1,102,329)

 

(740,973)

Monetary and Exchange Variations

(125,764)

 

(150,820)

 

(90,381)

(-) Capitalized borrowing costs

48,172

 

39,143

 

132,938

Public utilities

(58,480)

 

(57,319)

 

(31,578)

Other

(131,694)

 

(115,453)

 

(107,064)

Total

(1,487,964)

 

(1,386,778)

 

(837,058)

           

Net financial expenses

(767,632)

 

(625,378)

 

(271,307)

 

(¹) Includes the effects described in note 2.8

 

Interest was capitalized at an average rate of 8.23% p.a. in 2012 (9.95% p.a. in 2011) on qualifying  assets, in accordance with IAS 23. In 2010, R$ 84,839 of the total amount referred to energy generation projects that were in the process of development, especially Foz do Chapecó, EPASA and CPFL Bioenergia.

 

( 29 )  SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company’s operating segments are based on the internal financial information and management structure and are separated by type of business: electric energy distribution, conventional generation, renewable generation, commercialization and services rendered.

Since January 1, 2012, Management has started to analyze the services segment separately and the 2011 information is therefore presented for purposes of comparison.

Profit or loss, assets and liabilities per segment include items directly attributable to the segment, as well as those that can be allocated on a reasonable basis, if applicable. Average prices used between segments are based on similar market transactions. Note 1 shows the subsidiaries in accordance with their areas of operation and provides further information about each subsidiary and its business area.

The segregated information by operating segment is shown below, in accordance with the criteria established by Company Management:

F - 69


 
 

Table of Contents

 

       

Generation

 

Generation

                   
   

Distribution

 

(conventional sources)

 

(renewable sources)

 

Commercialization

 

Services

 

Other (*)

 

Elimination

 

Total

                                 

2012

                               

Net revenue

 

12,391,730

 

722,818

 

608,223

 

1,284,069

 

46,855

 

1,452

 

-

 

15,055,147

(-) Intersegment revenues

 

22,138

 

890,104

 

210,260

 

602,332

 

124,968

 

-

 

(1,849,802)

 

-

Income from electric energy service

 

1,421,718

 

880,997

 

215,139

 

255,193

 

26,276

 

(28,210)

 

-

 

2,771,113

Financial income

 

558,130

 

46,178

 

56,461

 

39,389

 

4,777

 

15,397

 

-

 

720,332

Financial expense

 

(632,278)

 

(432,179)

 

(254,333)

 

(140,506)

 

8,475

 

(37,143)

 

-

 

(1,487,964)

Income before taxes

 

1,347,570

 

494,996

 

17,268

 

154,076

 

39,528

 

(49,957)

 

-

 

2,003,481

Income tax and social contribution

 

(469,081)

 

(148,567)

 

(9,256)

 

(52,000)

 

(12,856)

 

(54,987)

 

-

 

(746,747)

Net Income

 

878,489

 

346,430

 

8,011

 

102,075

 

26,672

 

(104,944)

 

-

 

1,256,734

Total Assets (**)

 

14,739,978

 

6,517,342

 

8,786,521

 

466,645

 

186,303

 

378,897

 

-

 

31,075,687

Capital Expenditures and other intangible assets

 

1,402,994

 

20,446

 

1,021,970

 

2,870

 

18,865

 

508

     

2,467,653

Depreciation and Amortization

 

(544,192)

 

(286,594)

 

(289,372)

 

(3,177)

 

(3,693)

 

(74)

 

-

 

(1,127,103)

                                 

2011 (¹)

                               

Net revenue

 

11,048,924

 

609,755

 

96,378

 

946,499

 

61,281

 

1,191

 

-

 

12,764,028

(-) Intersegment revenues

 

16,831

 

839,029

 

75,513

 

623,556

 

74,572

 

-

 

(1,629,501)

 

-

Income from electric energy service

 

1,922,194

 

847,073

 

47,256

 

246,039

 

17,938

 

(29,953)

 

-

 

3,050,547

Financial income

 

492,584

 

80,617

 

56,924

 

69,768

 

6,134

 

55,373

 

-

 

761,400

Financial expense

 

(669,818)

 

(519,758)

 

(34,676)

 

(99,574)

 

(4,784)

 

(58,167)

 

-

 

(1,386,778)

Income before taxes

 

1,744,960

 

407,932

 

69,504

 

216,232

 

19,289

 

(32,747)

 

-

 

2,425,170

Income tax and social contribution

 

(592,528)

 

(112,592)

 

2,008

 

(68,430)

 

(7,258)

 

(22,096)

 

-

 

(800,896)

Net Income

 

1,152,432

 

295,339

 

71,513

 

147,802

 

12,031

 

(54,843)

 

-

 

1,624,273

Total Assets (**)

 

12,850,341

 

5,402,188

 

7,779,336

 

426,858

 

88,568

 

865,766

 

-

 

27,413,057

Capital Expenditures and other intangible assets

 

1,065,104

 

334,989

 

487,564

 

14,854

 

2,073

 

189

 

-

 

1,904,773

Depreciation and Amortization

 

(498,225)

 

(260,614)

 

(36,446)

 

(4,093)

 

(1,649)

 

(177)

 

-

 

(801,203)

                                 

(*) Other - Refers basically to the CPFL Energia figures after eliminations of balances with related parties.

(**) The goodwill created in an acquisition and recorded in CPFL Energia was allocated to the respective segments.

(¹) Includes the effects described in note 2.8.

Since August 1, 2011, as a result of the association with ERSA and acquisition of the shares of Jantus, described in note 13.3, Management has analyzed these operations separately, and a new operating segment was therefore created to segregate the activities related to renewable energies. Additionally, in 2012 the Management started to analyze the service segment separately and, as required by IFRS 8, the Company restated the information about previous year for comparison purposes. In 2010, the services segment was immaterial.

   

Distribution

 

Generation

 

Commercialization

 

Other (*)

 

Elimination

 

Total

                         

2012

                       

Net revenue

 

12,391,730

 

1,331,041

 

1,330,924

 

1,452

 

-

 

15,055,147

(-) Intersegment revenues

 

22,138

 

1,100,364

 

727,300

 

-

 

(1,849,802)

 

-

Income from electric energy service

 

1,421,718

 

1,096,136

 

281,469

 

(28,210)

 

-

 

2,771,113

Financial income

 

558,130

 

102,639

 

44,166

 

15,397

 

-

 

720,332

Financial expense

 

(632,278)

 

(686,512)

 

(132,031)

 

(37,143)

 

-

 

(1,487,964)

Income before taxes

 

1,347,570

 

512,264

 

193,604

 

(49,957)

 

-

 

2,003,481

Income tax and social contribution

 

(469,081)

 

(157,823)

 

(64,856)

 

(54,987)

 

-

 

(746,747)

Net Income

 

878,489

 

354,442

 

128,747

 

(104,944)

 

-

 

1,256,734

Total Assets (**)

 

14,739,978

 

15,303,864

 

652,948

 

378,897

 

-

 

31,075,687

Capital Expenditures and other intangible assets

 

1,402,994

 

1,042,416

 

21,735

 

508

     

2,467,653

Depreciation and Amortization

 

(544,192)

 

(575,967)

 

(6,870)

 

(74)

 

-

 

(1,127,103)

                         

2011 (¹)

                       

Net revenue

 

11,048,924

 

706,133

 

1,007,780

 

1,191

 

-

 

12,764,028

(-) Intersegment revenues

 

16,831

 

914,542

 

698,128

 

-

 

(1,629,501)

 

-

Income from electric energy service

 

1,922,194

 

894,329

 

263,977

 

(29,953)

 

-

 

3,050,547

Financial income

 

492,584

 

137,541

 

75,902

 

55,373

 

-

 

761,400

Financial expense

 

(669,818)

 

(554,435)

 

(104,358)

 

(58,167)

 

-

 

(1,386,778)

Income before taxes

 

1,744,960

 

477,436

 

235,521

 

(32,747)

 

-

 

2,425,170

Income tax and social contribution

 

(592,528)

 

(110,584)

 

(75,688)

 

(22,096)

 

-

 

(800,896)

Net Income

 

1,152,432

 

366,851

 

159,833

 

(54,843)

 

-

 

1,624,273

Total Assets (**)

 

12,850,341

 

13,181,524

 

515,426

 

865,766

 

-

 

27,413,057

Capital Expenditures and other intangible assets

 

1,065,104

 

822,553

 

16,927

 

189

 

-

 

1,904,773

Depreciation and Amortization

 

(498,225)

 

(297,060)

 

(5,742)

 

(177)

 

-

 

(801,203)

                         

2010 (¹)

                       

Net revenue

 

10,471,192

 

538,217

 

1,012,525

 

1,795

 

-

 

12,023,729

(-) Intersegment revenues

 

13,904

 

650,571

 

766,922

 

-

 

(1,431,397)

 

-

Income from electric energy service

 

1,852,867

 

616,416

 

302,981

 

(32,949)

 

-

 

2,739,315

Financial income

 

398,656

 

53,725

 

22,389

 

90,981

 

-

 

565,751

Financial expense

 

(394,999)

 

(323,441)

 

(22,311)

 

(96,307)

 

-

 

(837,058)

Income before taxes

 

1,856,385

 

345,914

 

302,024

 

(36,315)

 

-

 

2,468,008

Income tax and social contribution

 

(632,961)

 

(88,731)

 

(95,840)

 

(35,899)

 

-

 

(853,431)

Net Income

 

1,223,424

 

257,183

 

206,184

 

(72,214)

 

-

 

1,614,577

Total Assets (**)

 

11,689,503

 

7,568,600

 

349,047

 

449,647

 

-

 

20,056,797

Capital Expenditures and other intangible assets

 

1,127,637

 

645,040

 

27,853

 

10

 

-

 

1,800,540

Depreciation and Amortization

 

(352,806)

 

(188,981)

 

(4,553)

 

(145,453)

 

-

 

(691,793)

                         

(*) Other - Refers basically to the CPFL Energia figures after eliminations of balances with related parties.

(**) The goodwill created in an acquisition and recorded in CPFL Energia was allocated to the respective segments.

 

(¹) Includes the effects described in note 2.8.

 

F - 70


 
 

Table of Contents

  

( 30 )  RELATED PARTIES TRANSACTIONS

 

The Company’s controlling shareholders are as follows:

·   VBC Energia S.A., ESC Energia S.A. and Camargo Correa S.A.

Controlled by the Camargo Corrêa group, with operations in a number of segments, such as construction, cement, footwear, textiles, aluminium and highway concessions, among others.

·   Energia São Paulo Fundo de Investimento em Ações

Controlled by the following pension funds: (a) Fundação CESP, (b) Fundação SISTEL de Seguridade Social, (c) Fundação Petrobras de Seguridade Social - PETROS, and (d) Fundação SABESP de Seguridade Social - SABESPREV.

·   Bonaire Participações S.A.

Company controlled by Energia São Paulo Fundo de Investimento em Ações.

·   Fundo BB Carteira Livre I - Fundo de Investimento em Ações

Fund controlled by PREVI - Caixa de Previdência dos Funcionários do Banco do Brasil.

·   Previ - Caixa de Previdência dos Funcionários do Banco do Brasil

The direct and indirect participations in operating subsidiaries are described in note 1.

Controlling shareholders, subsidiaries and associated companies, jointly-controlled entities under common control and that in some way exercise significant influence over the Company are considered to be related parties.

The main transactions are listed below:

a)             Bank deposits and short-term investments –  refer mainly to bank deposits and short-term financial investments with the Banco do Brasil, as mentioned in note 5. The Company and its subsidiaries also has an Exclusive Investment Fund, managed, by BB DTVM, among others.

b)            Loans and Financing and Debentures – relate to funds raised from the Banco do Brasil in accordance with notes 15 and 16. The Company also guarantees certain loans raised by its subsidiaries, as mentioned in notes 15 and 16.

c)             Other Financial Transactions – the amounts in relation to Banco do Brasil are bank costs and collection expenses. The balance recorded in liabilities comprises basically the rights over the payroll processing of certain subsidiaries, negotiated with Banco do Brasil, which are appropriated in the income statement over the term of the contract. JBS S.A. transactions refer to ICMS credit acquisition.

d)             Intangible assets, Property, plant and equipment, Materials and Service – refer to the acquisition of equipment, cables and other materials for use in distribution and generation, and contracting of services such as construction and information technology consultancy

e)             Energy sales to the free market – refers basically to energy sales to free consumers, through short or long-term contracts made under conditions considered by the Company as being similar market conditions at the time of the negotiation, in accordance with internal policies established in advance by Company Management.

f)               Energy purchased in the free market –  refers basically to energy purchased by the commercialization and generation subsidiaries through short or long-term agreements in accordance with policies established in advance by Company Management.

g)              Other revenue –  refers basically to revenue from rental of use of the distribution system for telephone services.

 

 

F - 71


 
 

Table of Contents

 

h)           Purchase and sale of energy in the regulated market – The subsidiaries that are public distribution service concessionaires charge tariffs for the use of the distribution system (TUSD) and sell energy to related parties in their respective concession areas (captive consumers). The amounts charged are established in accordance with prices regulated by the regulatory agency. These distributors also purchase energy, and our power generation companies sell energy from related parties, mainly involving long-term agreements, in accordance with the rules established by the sector (principally by auction); these prices are also regulated and approved by ANEEL.

Certain subsidiaries have supplementary retirement plan maintained with Fundação CESP and offered to the employees of the subsidiaries, as mentioned in note 17.

To ensure that commercial transactions with related parties are conducted under normal market conditions, the Company set up a “Related Parties Committee”, comprising representatives of the controlling shareholders, responsible for analyzing the main transactions with related parties.

The total remuneration of key management personnel in 2012, in accordance with CVM Decision nº 560/2008 and IAS 34, was R$ 41,484. This amount comprises R$ 34,033 in respect of short-term benefits, R$ 1,109 for post-employment benefits and R$ 6,342 for other long-term benefits and refers to the amount recorded by the accrual method

Transactions between related parties involving controlling shareholders, entities under common control or with significant influence

 

     
   

Assets

 

Liabilities

 

Revenue

 

Expense

 

December
31, 2012

 

December
31, 2011

 

December
31, 2012

 

December
31, 2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

                                         

Bank deposits and short-term investments

                                       

Banco do Brasil S.A.

 

125,475

 

91,025

 

-

 

-

 

7,687

 

5,385

 

13,147

 

1

 

6

 

494

                                         

Loans and Financing, Debentures and Derivatives contracts (*)

 

                                     

Banco do Brasil S.A.

 

-

 

-

 

1,775,218

 

1,644,812

 

-

 

-

 

3,612

 

155,016

 

181,110

 

110,671

                                         

Other financial transactions

 

                                     

Banco do Brasil S.A.

 

-

 

-

 

1,224

 

3,184

 

1,633

 

1,819

 

1,458

 

5,483

 

4,867

 

4,005

JBS S.A.

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

4,010

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

                                         

Energy sales in the free market

 

                                     

Camargo Corrêa Cimentos S.A.

 

1,263

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

7,561

 

-

 

7,737

 

-

 

-

 

-

Energia Sustentável do Brasil S.A.

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

627

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

Fras-le S.A.

 

-

 

104

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

367

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

InterCement Brasil S.A.

 

-

 

931

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

6,339

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

NC Energia S.A.

 

-

 

1,784

 

-

 

-

 

19,813

 

19,091

 

18,745

 

-

 

-

 

-

Petrobrás

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

910

 

4,371

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

Tavex Brasil S.A.

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

18,448

 

22,458

 

19,983

 

-

 

-

 

-

Vale Energia S.A

 

6,594

 

7

 

-

 

-

 

77,041

 

30,548

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

                                         

Energy purchases in the free market

 

                                     

Afluente Transmissão de Energia Elétrica S.A.

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

8

 

8

 

-

Vale Energia S.A.

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

387

 

523

 

20,277

Petrobrás

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

36,440

 

7,967

 

-

Vale S.A.

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

2,877

 

30,304

 

-

 

21,024

 

1,406

 

-

InterCement Brasil S.A.

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

319

 

-

Concessionárias de Rodovias do Oeste de São Paulo

 

266

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

9

 

-

                                         

Intangible assets, Property, plant and equipment, Materials and Service

 

                                     

BNY Mellon Serviços Financeiros Distribuidora de T

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

3

 

-

Banco do Brasil S.A.

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

144

 

220

Boa Vista Empreendimento Imobiliário SPE Ltda

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

35

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

Brasil Telecom S.A.

 

-

 

-

 

127

 

15

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

737

 

944

 

834

Camargo Corrêa Cimentos S.A.

 

-

 

16,809

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

350

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

Centrais Elétricas de Santa Catarina S.A - Celesc

 

-

 

519

 

-

 

1

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

28

 

-

Concessionária do Sistema Anhanguera - Bandeirante S.A.

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

12

 

-

 

-

Concessionárias de Rodovias do Oeste de São Paulo

 

260

 

-

 

1

 

-

 

262

 

-

 

-

 

1

 

9

 

-

Construções e Comércio Camargo Corrêa S.A.

 

-

 

69,902

 

-

 

12

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

970

 

-

 

-

Embraer S.A.

 

2,326

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

Ferrovia Centro-Atlântica S.A. – FCA

 

112

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

112

 

-

 

-

 

100

 

5

 

-

HM 16 Empreendimento Imobiliário SPE Ltda

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

12

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

Industrias Romi S.A

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,276

 

69

 

19

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

Intercement Brasil S.A

 

-

 

758

 

-

 

-

 

1,545

 

3,162

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

JBS S.A.

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

43

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

Lagum Logística S.A.

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

139

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

Lupatech S.A

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1

 

9

 

-

Mineração Naque S.A.

 

21

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

160

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

MRS Lojística S.A.

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

82

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

Oi S.A.

 

-

 

-

 

1

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

10

 

-

 

-

Petrobrás

 

9

 

33

 

-

 

-

 

30

 

311

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

Raposo Tavares

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

21

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

Recanto dos Sonhos Empreendimento Imobiliário SPE

 

27

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

60

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

Renovias Concessionária S.A.

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

3

 

-

 

-

Rodovias Integradas do Oeste - SP Vias

 

-

 

-

 

26

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

24

 

-

 

-

SAMM - Sociedade de Atividades em Multimídia Ltda

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

578

 

-

 

-

 

122

 

-

 

-

Sumaré Matão Empreendimento Imobiliário SPE Ltda.

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

45

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

Telemar Norte Leste S.A

 

-

 

5

 

4

 

-

 

23

 

18

 

-

 

69

 

19

 

-

ThyssenKrupp Companhia Siderúrgica do Atlântico

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

628

 

-

Totvs S.A.

 

9

 

-

 

86

 

128

 

30

 

-

 

-

 

1,677

 

719

 

-

Vale Fertilizantes S.A.

 

9

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

30

 

19

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

                                         

Other revenue

 

                                     

Brasil Telecom S.A.

 

2,009

 

1,886

 

-

 

-

 

12,051

 

11,316

 

10,684

 

-

 

-

 

-

                                         

(*) Cost value, both for loans and for derivatives

                                       

 

F - 72


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

( 31 )  INSURANCE 

 

The subsidiaries maintain insurance policies with coverage based on specialized advice and takes into account the nature and degree of risk. The amounts are considered sufficient to cover any significant losses on assets and/or responsibilities. The principal insurance policies in the financial statements are:

 

Description

 

Type of cover

 

2012 (*)

 

2011 (*)

Non current assets

 

Fire, Lightning, Explosion, Machinery breakdown, Electrical Damage and Engeneering Risk

 

5,911,631

 

5,990,210

Transport

 

National Transport

 

180,766

 

260,617

Stored Materials

 

Fire, Lightning, Explosion and Robbery

 

50,935

 

50,922

Automobiles

 

Comprehensive Cover

 

6,604

 

4,394

Civil Liability

 

Electric Energy Distributors

 

138,555

 

300,163

Personnel

 

Group Life and Personal Accidents

 

172,736

 

155,265

Other

 

Operational risks and other

 

348,143

 

188,866

Total

     

6,809,371

 

6,950,436

(*) Unaudited Information.

       

 

 

( 32 )  RISK MANAGEMENT  

 

The business of the Company and its subsidiaries mainly comprises the generation, commercialization and distribution of electric energy.  As public utilities concessionaires, the operations and/or tariffs of its principal subsidiaries are regulated by ANEEL.

Risk management structure:

The Board of Directors is responsible for directing the way the business is run, which includes monitoring of business risks, exercised by means of the corporate risk management model used by the Company. The responsibilities of the Executive Board are to develop the mechanisms for measuring the impact of the exposure and probability of its occurrence, supervising the implementation of risk mitigation measures and informing the Board of Directors. It is assisted in this process by: i) the Corporate Risk Management Committee, whose mission is to assist in identifying the main business risks, analyzing measurement of the impact and probability and assessing the mitigation measures used; ii) the Risk Management, Internal Control and Consolidated Processes Division, responsible for developing the Company’s Corporate Risk Management model in respect of strategy (policy, direction and risk maps), processes (planning, measurement, monitoring and reporting), systems and governance.

 

The risk management policies are established to identify, analyze and treat the risks faced by the Company and its subsidiaries, and includes reviewing the model adopted whenever necessary to reflect changes in market conditions and in the Company's activities, with a view to developing an environment of disciplined and constructive control

 

In its supervisory role, the Company’s Board of Directors also counts on the support of the Management Procedures Committee to provide guidance for the Internal Auditing work and in preparing proposals for improvements. The Internal Auditing team conducts both periodic and “ad hoc” reviews in order to ensure alignment of the procedures to directives and strategies set by the shareholders and management.

 

The Fiscal Council’s responsibilities include certifying that Management has the means to identify and prevent, through the use of an appropriated information system, (a) the main risks to which the Company is exposed, (b) the probability that these will materialize and (c) the measures and plans adopted. The main market risk factors affecting the businesses are as follows:

 

F - 73


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Exchange rate risk: This risk derives from the possibility of the subsidiaries to incur in losses and cash constraints due to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, increasing the balances of liabilities denominated in foreign currency. The exposure in relation to raising funds in foreign currency is largely covered by contracting swap operations, which allow the Company and its subsidiaries to exchange the original risks of the operation for the cost of the variation in the CDI. The quantification of this risk is presented in note 33. The Company’s subsidiaries’s operations are also exposed to exchange variations on the purchase of electric energy from Itaipu. The compensation mechanism - CVA protects the companies against possible losses. However, the compensation only comes into effect through consumption and the consequent billing of energy after the next tariff adjustment in which such losses have been considered.

Interest Rate Risk: This risk derives from the possibility of the Company and its subsidiaries to incurr in losses due to fluctuations in interest rates that increase financial expenses on loans, financing and debentures. The subsidiaries have tried to increase the proportion of pre-indexed loans or loans tied to indexes with lower rates and little fluctuation in the short and long term. The quantification of this risk is presented in note 33.

Credit Risk: This risk arises from the possibility of the subsidiaries incurring losses resulting from difficulties in collecting amounts billed to customers. This risk is evaluated by the subsidiaries as low, as it is spread over the number of customers and in view of the collection policy and cancellation of supply to defaulting consumers.

Risk of Energy Shortages: The energy sold by the Company is primarily generated by hydropower plants. A prolonged period of low rainfall, together with an unforeseen increase in demand, could result in a reduction in the volume of water in the power plants’ reservoirs, compromising the recovery of their volume, and resulting in losses due to the increase in the cost of purchasing energy or a reduction in revenue due to the introduction of another rationing program, as in 2001. According to the Annual Energy Operation Plan - PEN 2012, drawn up by the National Electrical System Operator, the risks of any energy shortfall is low for 2013, and another energy rationing program is unlikely. These risks could be mitigated by early generation of thermal energy, using the Short-Term Operating Procedures (Procedimentos Operativos de Curto Prazo – POCP), or by an advance order authorized by the Electrical Sector Monitoring Committee (Comitê de Monitoramento do Setor Elétrico – CMSE), thereby diminishing depletion of the reservoirs.

Risk of Acceleration of Debts: The Company and its subsidiaries have loans and financing agreements and debentures with restrictive clauses (covenants) normally applicable to these kinds of arrangement, involving compliance with economic and financial ratios, cash generation, etc. These covenants are monitored appropriately and do not restrict the capacity to operate normally.

Regulatory risk: The electric energy supplied tariffs charged to captive consumers by the distribution subsidiaries are fixed by ANEEL, at intervals established in the Concession Agreements entered into with the Federal Government and in accordance with the periodic tariff review methodology established for the tariff cycle. Once the methodology has been ratified, ANEEL establishes tariffs to be charged by the distributor to the final consumers. In accordance with Law 8.987/1995, the fixed tariffs should insure the economic and financial balance of the concession contract at the time of the tariff review, which could result in lower results than expected by the electric energy distributors, albeit offset in subsequent periods by other adjustments.

Risk Management for Financial instruments

The Company and its subsidiaries maintain operating and financial policies and strategies to protect the liquidity, safety and profitability of their assets. They accordingly control and follow-up procedures are in place on the transactions and balances of financial instruments, for the purpose of monitoring the risks and current rates in relation to market conditions.

Risk management controls: In order to manage the risks inherent to the financial instruments and to monitor the procedures established by Management, the Company and its subsidiaries use the MAPS software system to calculate the mark to market, stress testing and duration of the instruments, and assess the risks to which the Company and its subsidiaries are exposed. Historically, the financial instruments contracted by the Company and its subsidiaries supported by these tools have produced adequate risk mitigation results. It must be stressed that the Company and its subsidiaries routinely contract derivatives, always with the appropriate levels of approval, only in the event of exposure that Management regards as a risk. The Company and its subsidiaries do not enter into transactions involving exotic or speculative derivatives. Furthermore, the Company meets the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Law, and accordingly have internal control policies that aim for a strict control environment to minimize the exposure to risks.

F - 74


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

( 33 )  FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS   

 

The main financial instruments, classified in accordance with the group’s accounting practices, are:

 

             

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

Category

 

Measurement

 

Level(*)

 

Accounting balance

 

Fair value

 

Accounting balance

 

Fair value

Assets

                         

Cash and cash equivalent (note 5)

(a)

 

(2)

 

Level 1

 

1,157,375

 

1,157,375

 

2,699,837

 

2,699,837

Cash and cash equivalent (note 5)

(a)

 

(2)

 

Level 2

 

1,320,519

 

1,320,519

 

-

 

-

Consumers, Concessionaires and Licensees (note 6)

(b)

 

(1)

 

n/a

 

2,430,618

 

2,430,618

 

2,056,580

 

2,056,580

Leases

(b)

 

(1)

 

n/a

 

41,443

 

41,443

 

29,102

 

29,102

Financial investments

(c)

 

(1)

 

n/a

 

3,939

 

3,939

 

120,578

 

120,578

Financial investments

(a)

 

(2)

 

Level 1

 

2,161

 

2,161

 

36,908

 

36,908

Derivatives (note 33)

(a)

 

(2)

 

Level 2

 

487,308

 

487,308

 

219,375

 

219,375

Financial asset of concession (note 10)

(d)

 

(2)

 

Level 3

 

2,342,796

 

2,342,796

 

1,376,664

 

1,376,664

Other finance assets (**)

(b)

 

(1)

 

n/a

 

427,620

 

427,620

 

221,677

 

221,677

             

8,213,779

 

8,213,779

 

6,760,719

 

6,760,719

Liabilities

                         

Suppliers (note 14)

(e)

 

(1)

 

n/a

 

1,695,469

 

1,695,469

 

1,240,143

 

1,240,143

Loans and financing - (note 15)

(e)

 

(1)

 

n/a

 

8,410,657

 

8,256,545

 

6,740,144

 

6,554,672

Loans and financing - (note 15) (****)

(a)

 

(2)

 

Level 2

 

2,388,245

 

2,388,245

 

1,704,254

 

1,704,254

Debentures - principal and interest (note 16)

(e)

 

(1)

 

n/a

 

6,327,216

 

6,532,832

 

5,163,388

 

5,350,263

Regulatory charges (note 18)

(e)

 

(1)

 

n/a

 

114,488

 

114,488

 

145,146

 

145,146

Derivatives (note 33)

(a)

 

(2)

 

Level 2

 

445

 

445

 

24

 

24

Public utility (note 21)

(e)

 

(1)

 

n/a

 

491,579

 

491,579

 

469,664

 

469,664

Other finance liabilities (***)

(e)

 

(1)

 

n/a

 

173,385

 

173,385

 

333,928

 

333,928

             

19,601,484

 

19,652,987

 

15,796,693

 

15,798,096

(*) Refers to the hierarchy for determination of fair value

(**) Other financial assets include: (i) Pledges, funds and tied deposits, (ii) Fund tied to the foreign currency loan, (iii) Services rendered to third parties, (iv) Refund of RGR and (v) Collection agreements, as disclosed in note 11

(***) Other financial liabilities include: (i) Consumers and concessionaires, (ii) Nacional scietific and technological development fund - FNDCT, (iii) Energy research company - EPE, (iv) Collection agreement, (v) Reversal fund and (vi) Business acquisition, as disclosed in note 23.

(****) As a result of the initial designation of this financial liability, the financial statements showed a loss of R$88,206 (R$14,350 in 2011)

                           

Key

             

Category:

 

Measurement:

                   

(a) - Measured at fair value through profit or loss

 

(1) - Measured at amortized cost

           

(b) - Loans and receivables

 

(2) - Mensured at fair value

           

(c) - Held to maturity

                         

(d) - Available for sale

                         

(e) - Other finance liabilities

                         

 

a) Valuation of financial instruments

As mentioned in note 4, the fair value of a security relates to its maturity value (redemption value) marked to present value by the discount factor (relating to the maturity date of the security) obtained from the market interest graph, in Brazilian reais.

IFRS 7 requires classification at three levels of hierarchy for measurement of the fair value of financial instruments, based on observable and unobservable information in relation to valuation of a financial instrument at the measurement date.

IFRS 7 also defines observable information as market data obtained from independent sources and unobservable information that reflects market assumptions.

The three levels of fair value are:

· Level 1: quoted prices in an active market for identical instruments;

· Level 2: observable information other than quoted prices in an active market that are observable for the asset or liability, directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices);

· Level 3: inputs for the instruments that are not based on observable market data.

 

 

F - 75


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Since the distribution subsidiaries have classified their financial asset of concession as available-for-sale, the relevant factors for measurement at fair value are not publicly observable. The fair value hierarchy classification is therefore level 3. The changes between years and the respective gains (losses) in net income are disclosed in note 10. There is no effect on equity.

The Company recognizes in “Investments at cost” in the financial statements the 5.93% interest held by the indirect subsidiary Paulista Lajeado Energia S.A. in the total capital of Investco S.A. (“Investco”), in the form of 28,154 common shares and 18,593 preferred shares. Investco’s shares are not quoted on the stock exchange and the main objective of it operations is to generate electric energy for commercialization by the shareholders who hold the concession, the Company opted to recognize the investment at cost.

 

b) Derivatives

The Company and its subsidiaries have the policy of using derivatives to reduce their risks of variations in exchange and interest rates, without any speculative purposes. The Company and its subsidiaries have exchange rate derivatives compatible with the exchange rate risks net exposure, including all the assets and liabilities tied to exchange rates.

The derivative instruments entered into by the Company and its subsidiaries are currency or interest rate swaps with no leverage component, margin call requirements or daily or periodical adjustments. As the majority of the derivatives entered into by the subsidiaries (note 15) have their terms fully aligned with the debts protected, and in order to obtain more relevant and consistent accounting information through the recognition of income and expenses, these debts were designated at fair value, for accounting purposes. Other debts with different terms from their respective derivatives contracted as a hedge continue to be recorded at amortized cost. Furthermore, the Company and its subsidiaries do not adopt hedge accounting for derivative operations.

 

At December 31, 2012, the Company and its subsidiaries had the following swap operations:

 

 

F - 76


 
 

Table of Contents

 

                                     
   

Market values (accounting balance)

                       

Company / strategy / counterparts

 

Asset

 

Liabilities

 

Fair value, net

 

Values at cost, net

 

Gain (Loss) on marking to market

 

Currecy / index

 

Maturity range

 

Notional

 

Negotiation market

Derivatives for protection of debts designated at fair value

                                     

Exchange rate hedge:

                                   
                                     

CPFL Paulista

                                   

BNP Paribas

 

55,530

 

-

 

55,530

 

49,156

 

6,374

 

dollar

 

June 2014

 

160,000

 

Over the counter

J.P.Morgan

 

25,983

 

-

 

25,983

 

22,834

 

3,149

 

dollar

 

July 2014

 

78,250

 

Over the counter

J.P.Morgan

 

27,453

 

-

 

27,453

 

24,552

 

2,901

 

dollar

 

Aug 2014

 

76,700

 

Over the counter

Morgan Stanley

 

19,953

 

-

 

19,953

 

15,852

 

4,101

 

dollar

 

Sep 2016

 

85,475

 

Over the counter

Bank of America

 

75,743

 

-

 

75,743

 

67,918

 

7,824

 

dollar

 

July 2014

 

235,050

 

Over the counter

Bank of America

 

61,153

 

-

 

61,153

 

46,303

 

14,849

 

dollar

 

July 2016

 

156,700

 

Over the counter

Societe Generale

 

13,755

 

-

 

13,755

 

10,762

 

2,993

 

dollar

 

Aug 2016

 

33,173

 

Over the counter

Citibank

 

19,843

 

-

 

19,843

 

15,613

 

4,230

 

dollar

 

Sep 2016

 

85,750

 

Over the counter

HSBC

 

9,117

 

-

 

9,117

 

7,657

 

1,460

 

dollar

 

Sep 2014

 

41,050

 

Over the counter

Scotia Bank

 

1,130

     

1,130

 

(739)

 

1,869

 

dollar

 

July 2016

 

49,000

 

Over the counter

Subtotal

 

309,659

 

-

 

309,659

 

259,909

 

49,750

               
                                     

CPFL Piratininga

                                   

BNP Paribas

 

16,539

 

-

 

16,539

 

14,761

 

1,778

 

dollar

 

July 2014

 

45,990

 

Over the counter

J.P.Morgan

 

54,783

 

-

 

54,783

 

49,079

 

5,704

 

dollar

 

Aug 2014

 

153,400

 

Over the counter

Bank of America

 

26,254

 

-

 

26,254

 

21,137

 

5,117

 

dollar

 

Aug 2016

 

80,250

 

Over the counter

Societe Generale

 

18,049

 

-

 

18,049

 

14,122

 

3,927

 

dollar

 

Aug 2016

 

43,527

 

Over the counter

Citibank

 

3,970

 

-

 

3,970

 

3,358

 

612

 

dollar

 

Aug 2016

 

12,840

 

Over the counter

Scotia Bank

 

1,476

     

1,476

 

(965)

 

2,441

 

dollar

 

July 2016

 

64,000

 

Over the counter

Subtotal

 

121,071

 

-

 

121,071

 

101,492

 

19,579

               
                                     

CPFL Sul Paulista

                                   

Citibank

 

1,836

 

-

 

1,836

 

1,655

 

180

 

dollar

 

Sep 2014

 

8,000

 

Over the counter

J.P.Morgan

 

(176)

 

-

 

(176)

 

(414)

 

238

 

dollar

 

July 2015

 

10,500

 

Over the counter

Scotia Bank

 

35

 

-

 

35

 

(199)

 

235

 

dollar

 

July 2015

 

10,500

 

Over the counter

Subtotal

 

1,695

 

-

 

1,695

 

1,042

 

653

               
                                     

CPFL Santa Cruz

                                   

J.P.Morgan

 

-

 

(336)

 

(336)

 

(789)

 

453

 

dollar

 

Jan 2013

 

20,000

 

Over the counter

                                     

CPFL Leste Paulista

                                   

Citibank

 

1,812

 

-

 

1,812

 

1,655

 

157

 

dollar

 

Sep 2014

 

8,000

 

Over the counter

Scotia Bank

 

23

     

23

 

(474)

 

498

 

dollar

 

July 2015

 

25,000

 

Over the counter

Subtotal

 

1,836

 

-

 

1,836

 

1,181

 

654

               
                                     

CPFL Mococa

                                   

Citibank

 

1,606

 

-

 

1,606

 

1,448

 

158

 

dollar

 

Sep 2014

 

7,000

 

Over the counter

Scotia Bank

 

37

     

37

 

(209)

 

246

 

dollar

 

July 2015

 

11,000

 

Over the counter

Subtotal

 

1,643

 

-

 

1,643

 

1,240

 

403

               
                                     

CPFL Jaguari

                                   

Citibank

 

2,006

 

-

 

2,006

 

1,830

 

176

 

dollar

 

Aug 2014

 

7,000

 

Over the counter

Scotia Bank

 

44

     

44

 

(247)

 

290

 

dollar

 

July 2015

 

13,000

 

Over the counter

Subtotal

 

2,050

 

-

 

2,050

 

1,584

 

466

               
                                     

CPFL Geração

                                   

Citibank

 

31,695

 

-

 

31,695

 

26,586

 

5,109

 

dollar

 

Aug 2016

 

100,000

 

Over the counter

                                     

RGE

                                   

J.P.Morgan

 

2,085

 

-

 

2,085

 

(546)

 

2,631

 

dollar

 

July 2012 to July 2016

 

94,410

 

Over the counter

Citibank

 

15,388

     

15,388

 

13,334

 

2,054

 

dollar

 

Apr 2012 to Apr 2016

 

128,590

 

Over the counter

Subtotal

 

17,473

 

-

 

17,473

 

12,788

 

4,685

               
                                     

Subtotal

 

487,121

 

(336)

 

486,785

 

405,032

 

81,753

               
                                     

Derivatives for protection of debts not designated at fair value

                                     

Exchange rate hedge:

                                   
                                     

CPFL Paulista

                                   

Bank of America Merrill Lynch

 

(3)

     

(3)

 

(11)

 

8

 

dollar

 

April 2013

 

1,816

 

Over the counter

Bank of America Merrill Lynch

 

1

     

1

 

(6)

 

7

 

dollar

 

Oct 2013

 

1,002

 

Over the counter

Bank of America Merrill Lynch

 

24

     

24

 

(57)

 

81

 

dollar

 

Oct 2014

 

9,867

 

Over the counter

Subtotal

 

22

 

-

 

22

 

(73)

 

95

               
                                     

CPFL Geração

                                   

Votorantim

 

(776)

 

(109)

 

(885)

 

(946)

 

61

 

dollar

 

Jan 2013 to Dec 2014

 

57,678

 

Over the counter

                                     

Hedge interest rate variation (1):

                                   
                                     

CPFL Energia

                                   

Citibank

 

611

 

-

 

611

 

142

 

469

 

CDI + spread

 

Sep 2014

 

300,000

 

Over the counter

                                     

RGE

                                   

Santander

 

244

 

-

 

244

 

19

 

225

 

CDI + spread

 

Dec 2011 to Dec 2013

 

93,333

 

Over the counter

Citibank

 

83

 

-

 

83

 

7

 

76

 

CDI + spread

 

Dec 2011 to Dec 2013

 

33,333

 

Over the counter

Subtotal

 

327

 

-

 

327

 

26

 

301

               
                                     

Hedge interest rate variation (2):

                                   
                                     

CPFL Piratininga

                                   

HSBC

 

2

 

-

 

2

 

2

 

-

 

TJLP

 

Jan 2013

 

1,139

 

Over the counter

Santander

 

2

 

-

 

2

 

2

 

-

 

TJLP

 

Jan 2013

 

1,140

 

Over the counter

Subtotal

 

4

 

-

 

4

 

4

 

-

               
                                     

Subtotal

 

188

 

(109)

 

79

 

(847)

 

926

               
                                     

Total

 

487,308

 

(445)

 

486,864

 

404,185

 

82,679

               
                                     

Current

 

870

 

(109)

                           

Non-current

 

486,438

 

(336)

                           

Total

 

487,308

 

(445)

                           
                                     

For further details of terms and information about debts and debentures, see Notes 15 and 16

(¹) The interest rate hedge swaps have half-yearly validity, so the notional value reduces in accordance with amortization of the debt.

(²) The interest rate hedge swaps have monthly validity, so the notional value reduces in accordance with amortization of the debt.

 

 

  

F - 77


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

As mentioned above, certain subsidiaries opted to mark to market debts for which they have fully tied derivative instruments, resulting in a loss of R$ 13,682 at December 31, 2012 (note 15).

The Company and its subsidiaries have recorded gains and losses on their derivatives. However, as these derivatives are used as a hedge, these gains and losses minimized the impact of variations in exchange and interest rates on the protected debts. For the years 2012, 2011 and 2010, the derivatives resulted in the following impacts on the result:

 

           

Gain (Loss)

Company

 

Hedged risk / transaction

 

Account

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

CPFL Energia

 

Interest rate variation

 

Swap of interest rate

 

356

 

161

 

(14)

CPFL Energia

 

Mark to market

 

Adjustment to fair value

 

451

 

(608)

 

20

CPFL Paulista

 

Exchange variation

 

Swap of currency

 

60,219

 

169,033

 

(3,269)

CPFL Paulista

 

Mark to market

 

Adjustment to fair value

 

50,866

 

8,611

 

392

CPFL Piratininga

 

Interest rate variation

 

Swap of interest rate

 

207

 

6

 

3

CPFL Piratininga

 

Exchange variation

 

Swap of currency

 

20,949

 

59,514

 

-

CPFL Piratininga

 

Mark to market

 

Adjustment to fair value

 

19,711

 

118

 

(254)

RGE

 

Interest rate variation

 

Swap of interest rate

 

498

 

217

 

553

RGE

 

Exchange variation

 

Swap of currency

 

9,130

 

-

 

-

RGE

 

Mark to market

 

Adjustment to fair value

 

4,596

 

168

 

(71)

CPFL Geração

 

Interest rate variation

 

Swap of interest rate

 

167

 

(468)

 

567

CPFL Geração

 

Exchange variation

 

Swap of currency

 

8,261

 

13,630

 

(16,094)

CPFL Geração

 

Mark to market

 

Adjustment to fair value

 

5,676

 

2,495

 

1,710

CPFL Santa Cruz

 

Exchange variation

 

Swap of currency

 

(789)

 

-

 

-

CPFL Santa Cruz

 

Mark to market

 

Adjustment to fair value

 

453

 

-

 

-

CPFL Leste Paulista

 

Exchange variation

 

Swap of currency

 

(87)

 

749

 

-

CPFL Leste Paulista

 

Mark to market

 

Adjustment to fair value

 

653

 

(23)

 

-

CPFL Sul Paulista

 

Exchange variation

 

Swap of currency

 

(226)

 

749

 

-

CPFL Sul Paulista

 

Mark to market

 

Adjustment to fair value

 

676

 

(23)

 

-

CPFL Jaguari

 

Exchange variation

 

Swap of currency

 

138

 

985

 

-

CPFL Jaguari

 

Mark to market

 

Adjustment to fair value

 

454

 

(6)

 

-

CPFL Mococa

 

Exchange variation

 

Swap of currency

 

130

 

656

 

-

CPFL Mococa

 

Mark to market

 

Adjustment to fair value

 

403

 

(21)

 

-

           

182,892

 

255,942

 

(16,457)

 

c) Sensitivity Analysis

In compliance with CVM Instruction n° 475/08 and IFRS 7, the Company and its subsidiaries performed sensitivity analyses of the main risks to which their financial instruments (including derivatives) are exposed, mainly comprising variations in exchange and interest rates, as shown below:

 

c.1) Exchange rates variation 

Considering the level of net exchange rate exposure at December 31, 2012 is maintained, the simulation of the effects by type of financial instrument for three different scenarios would be:

 

Instruments

 

Exposure

 

Risk

 

Exchange depreciation of 4.9% (*)

 

Exchange depreciation of 25% (**)

 

Exchange depreciation of 50% (**)

Financial asset instruments

 

34,287

 

dollar appreciation

 

1,675

 

8,572

 

17,144

Financial liability instruments

 

(2,526,520)

 

dollar appreciation

 

(123,390)

 

(631,630)

 

(1,263,260)

Derivatives - Plain Vanilla Swap

 

2,463,835

 

dollar appreciation

 

120,328

 

615,959

 

1,231,918

Total

 

(28,397)

     

(1,387)

 

(7,099)

 

(14,199)

(*) In accordance with exchange graphs contained in information provided by the BM&FBOVESPA.

(**) In compliance with CVM Instruction 475/08 and IFRS 7, the percentage of exchange depreciation are related to exchange rate as of December 31, 2012.

 

c.2) Variation in interest rates

Assuming (i) the scenario of net exposure of the financial instruments indexed to variable interest rates at December 31, 2012 is maintained, and (ii) the respective accumulated annual indexes for 2012 remain stable (CDI 8.38% p.a; IGP-M 7.82% p.a.; TJLP  5.75% p.a.), the effects on the Company’s 2013 financial statements would be a net financial expense of R$ 948,753. In the event of fluctuations in the indexes in accordance with the three scenarios described below, the effect on the net financial expense would as follows:

F - 78


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

Instruments

 

Exposure

 

Risk

 

Scenario I (*)

 

Raising index by 25% (**)

 

Raising index by 50% (**)

Financial asset instruments

 

2,851,070

 

CDI appreciation

 

(37,064)

 

59,730

 

119,460

Financial liability instruments

 

(8,526,240)

 

CDI appreciation

 

110,841

 

(178,625)

 

(357,249)

Derivatives - Plain Vanilla Swap

 

(1,979,260)

 

CDI appreciation

 

25,730

 

(41,466)

 

(82,931)

   

(7,654,431)

     

99,508

 

(160,360)

 

(320,721)

                     

Financial asset instruments

 

6,100

 

IGP-M appreciation

 

(146)

 

119

 

238

Financial liability instruments

 

(548,830)

 

IGP-M appreciation

 

13,117

 

(10,730)

 

(21,459)

   

(542,730)

     

12,971

 

(10,610)

 

(21,221)

                     

Financial liability instruments

 

(4,609,135)

 

TJLP appreciation

 

34,569

 

(66,256)

 

(132,513)

Derivatives - Plain Vanilla Swap

 

2,290

 

TJLP appreciation

 

(17)

 

33

 

66

   

(4,606,845)

     

34,551

 

(66,223)

 

(132,447)

                     

Total increase

 

(12,804,005)

     

147,030

 

(237,194)

 

(474,388)

(*) The CDI, IGP-M and TJLP indexes considered of 7.08%, 5.43% and &5%, respectively, were obtained from information available in the market.

(**) In compliance with CVM Instruction 475/08 and IFRS 7, the percentage of raising index are related to information as of December 31, 2012.

 

d) Liquidity analysis

The Company manages liquidity risk by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows, and by matching the maturity profiles of its financial liabilities. The table below sets out details of the contractual maturities of the non-derivative financial liabilities as at December 31, 2012, taking into account principal and interest, and is based on the undiscounted cash flow, considering the earliest date on which the Company and its subsidiaries have to settle their respective obligations.

 

December 31, 2012

 

Weighted average interest rates

 

Less than 1 month

 

1-3 months

 

3 months to 1 year

 

1-5 years

 

5+ years

 

Total

Suppliers (note 14)

     

1,176,748

 

498,406

 

15,847

 

4,467

 

-

 

1,695,469

Loans and financing - Principal and interest (note 15)

 

7.97%

 

523,120

 

273,842

 

964,913

 

7,304,124

 

6,263,827

 

15,329,827

Debentures - Principal and interest (note 16)

 

8.10%

 

61,108

 

10,707

 

365,544

 

4,285,455

 

4,642,926

 

9,365,739

Regulatory Charges (note 18)

     

110,539

 

3,949

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

114,488

Public Utilities (note 21)

 

14.21%

 

630

 

764

 

31,117

 

73,413

 

3,353,996

 

3,459,920

Other (note 22)

     

27,533

 

112,810

 

15,292

 

-

 

17,750

 

173,386

Consumers, Concessionaires and Licensees

     

20,576

 

33,244

 

6,423

 

-

 

-

 

60,243

National Scientific and Technological decelopment Fund - FNDCT

     

4,715

 

387

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

5,102

Energy Research Company - EPE

     

2,242

 

308

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

2,550

Collection Agreements

     

-

 

76,371

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

76,371

Reversal Fund

     

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

17,750

 

17,750

Business acquisition

     

-

 

2,500

 

8,869

 

-

 

-

 

11,369

Total

     

1,899,679

 

900,477

 

1,392,714

 

11,667,459

 

14,278,499

 

30,138,828

 

 

F - 79


 
 

Table of Contents

 

( 34 )  COMMITTMENTS  

 

The Company’s commitments in relation to long-term energy purchase agreements and plant construction projects are as follows:

 

Commitments as of December 31, 2012:

 

Duration

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

2016

 

Thereafter

 

Total

Energy purchase contracts (except Itaipu)

 

Until 36 years

 

6,025,901

 

5,747,821

 

5,817,806

 

6,188,190

 

70,143,401

 

93,923,119

Itaipu

 

Until 30 years

 

1,099,773

 

1,112,594

 

1,116,810

 

1,143,117

 

12,595,799

 

17,068,094

Power plant construction projects (a)

 

Until 20 years

 

886,146

 

510,106

 

74,265

 

34,305

 

557,530

 

2,062,352

Total

     

8,011,819

 

7,370,521

 

7,008,881

 

7,365,612

 

83,296,731

 

113,053,565

                             

(a) Power plant construction projects include commitments made by the Company corresponding to its proportional share on construction, concession acquisition and bank guarantees relating to the jointly-controlled under development companies.

 

 

F - 80


 
 

Table of Contents

 

( 35 )  REGULATORY ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

 

The Company has the following assets and liabilities for regulatory purposes, which are not recorded in the financial statements.

 

   

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

Assets

           

Consumers, Concessionaires and Licensees

           

Discounts TUSD (*) and Irrigation

 

65,534

 

67,244

 

54,408

             

Deferred Costs Variations

           

Parcel "A"

 

-

 

-

 

333

CVA (**)

 

897,364

 

404,148

 

333,621

   

897,364

 

404,148

 

333,954

Prepaid Expenses

           

Overcontracting

 

74,885

 

27,364

 

23,860

Low income consumers' subsidy - losses

 

2,064

 

17,922

 

34,994

Neutrality of the sector charges

 

2,850

 

224

 

-

Tariff adjustment

 

2,696

 

467

 

-

Other financial components

 

92,582

 

53,180

 

67,515

   

175,078

 

99,157

 

126,369

Liabilities

           

Deferred Gains Variations

           

Parcel "A"

 

(1,443)

 

(1,337)

 

(11,472)

CVA (**)

 

(373,784)

 

(488,500)

 

(364,365)

   

(375,227)

 

(489,838)

 

(375,837)

Other Accounts Payable

           

Tariff review

 

(242,987)

 

-

 

-

Discounts TUSD (*) and Irrigation

 

(363)

 

(127)

 

(1,923)

Overcontracting

 

(28,919)

 

(48,367)

 

(61,391)

Low income consumers' subsidy - gains

 

(22,813)

 

(17,010)

 

(6,280)

Neutrality of the sector charges

 

(66,985)

 

(97,138)

 

(63,905)

Tariff review - provisional procedure

 

-

 

(32,181)

 

-

Other financial components

 

(4,254)

 

(5,739)

 

(29,666)

   

(366,321)

 

(200,562)

 

(163,165)

             

Total net

 

396,428

 

(119,851)

 

(24,272)

 

(*) Network Usage Charge - TUSD

(**) Deferred Tariff Costs and Gains Variations from Parcel "A" itens - ("CVA")

 

The main features of these regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities are:

a) TUSD Discounts and Irrigation:

The distribution subsidiaries record regulatory assets and liabilities (for regulatory financial statement purpose only) in relation to the special discounts applied on the TUSD to the free consumers, in respect of electric energy supplied from alternative sources and on the tariffs for energy supplied for irrigation and aquaculture.

b) CVA:

Refers to the mechanism for offsetting the variations in unmanageable costs incurred by the electric energy distribution concessionaires. These variations are calculated in accordance with the difference between the expenses effectively incurred and the expenses estimated at the time of establishing the tariffs in the annual tariff adjustments. The amounts taken into consideration in the CVA are monetary adjustment  at the SELIC rate.

c) Overcontracting:

Electric energy distribution concessionaires are obliged to guarantee 100% of their energy and power market through contracts approved, registered and ratified by ANEEL, and are also assured that costs or income derived from overcontracting will be passed on to the tariffs, restricted to 3% of the energy load requirement.

F - 81


 
 

Table of Contents

 

d) Subsidy - Low Income:

Refers to the subsidies granted to consumers entitled to the Social Electric Energy Tariff (Low Income) if they are enrolled in the Sole Register for Federal Government Social Programs (Cadastro Único para Programas Sociais do Governo Federal – CadÚnico), irrespective of their energy consumption.

e) Neutrality of the Sector Charges:

Refers to the neutrality of the sector charges in the tariff, calculating the monthly differences between the amounts billed and the amounts considered in the tariff.

f) Tariff review / Provisional Procedure:

The 2011 tariff review for the subsidiary CPFL Piratininga was scheduled for October 23, 2011. Although it had not been finalized, ANEEL established in Order nº 4.991, of December 29, 2011, that for regulatory purposes, the regulatory assets and liabilities should be calculated on a best estimate basis. On October 16, 2012, ANEEL’s Collegiate Board approved the subsidiary’s annual Tariff Adjustment - RTA for 2012, taking into account the impact of 1/3 of the financial component of the 2011 periodic tariff review - RTP. In Order nº 155, of January 23, 2013, ANEEL reviewed the accounting classification of the Provisional Procedure and created the replacement reimbursement account in the periodical tariff review.

The 2012 tariff review for the subsidiaries CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Leste Paulista, CPFL Sul Paulista, CPFL Jaguari and CPFL Mococa was scheduled for February 7, 2012. Although it had not been finalized, ANEEL established in Order nº 4.991, of December 29, 2011, that for regulatory purposes, the regulatory assets and liabilities should be calculated on a best estimate basis.

g) Other Financial Components:

Mainly refers to CCEAR exposure (Agreement for commercialization of electric energy in the regulated environment), financial guarantees, subsidies to cooperatives and licensees and TUSD G financial adjustment (distribution system usage tariff billed to the generators).

Financial components were also granted in the tariff review of the distributors, to adjust previous tariff reviews or adjustments.

 

( 36 )  NON CASH TRANSACTION

 

 

   

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

Transactions resulting from business combinations

           

Loans, financing and debentures

 

(556,706)

 

(781,892)

 

-

Property, plant and eqiupment acquired through business combination

 

695,093

 

953,171

 

-

Intangible asset acquired in business combination, net of tax effects

 

514,644

 

738,554

 

-

Other net assets acquired through business combination

 

82,841

 

84,377

 

-

   

735,872

 

994,210

 

-

Cash acquired in the business combination

 

(28,278)

 

(6,826)

 

-

Acquisition price payable

 

(1,408)

 

(173,054)

 

-

Acquisition price paid

 

706,186

 

814,330

 

-

             

Other transactions

           

Provision for socio-environmental costs capitalized in property, plant and equipment

 

33,528

 

-

 

-

Reversal of provisions for socio-environmental costs capitalized in property, plant and equipment

 

(66,773)

 

-

 

-

Transfer from fixed assets to leasing

 

1,791

 

-

 

-

Interest capitalized in property, plant and equipment

 

32,527

 

6,861

 

84,839

Interest capitalized in intangible concessoin asset - distribution infrastructure

 

15,645

 

32,281

 

48,099

 

 

 

 

F - 82


 
 

Table of Contents

 

( 37 )  RELEVANT FACT AND SUBSEQUENT EVENT

 

37.1 – Stock Purchase Option – Company’s controlling shareholders:

 

In a Relevant Fact dated January 24, 2013, the Company was informed by its shareholders Bonaire and Energia SP FIA of exercise of the option to purchase all the additional shares, corresponding to 4% of the shares tied to the CPFL Energia Shareholders’ Agreement held by VBC Energia S.A. and/or its successors, and by 521 Participações S.A, succeeded by BB Carteira Livre I (“BB CL I”), in accordance with Purchase Option Instrument signed on July 17, 2002 by VBC, 521 and Bonaire.

 

The Company’s shareholders VBC and their successors Camargo Corrêa S/A (“CCSA”) and ESC Energia S/A (“ESC”), and Caixa de Previdência dos Funcionários do Banco do Brasil (PREVI), successor and sole quotaholder of BB CL I, informed the Company of their acceptance of exercise of the Purchase Option, indicating clearly and unequivocally their wish to dispose of the shares tied to the Shareholders’ Agreement.

 

In a Relevant Fact dated March 28, 2013, the Company informed that this transaction was concluded, thereby CCSA disposed of 11,804,530 shares tied to Energia SP FIA and PREVI disposed of 9,897,860 shares tied to Energia SP FIA. Furthermore, on March 25, 2013, the VBC transferred 9.897.860 shares tied to ESC as payment of the capital increase. VBC and ESC are companies belonging to the Camargo Corrêa Group and ESC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of VBC.

 

After completion of the transaction, ownership of the tied shares to the CPFL Energia Shareholders’ Agreement, were as follows:

 

   

Number of shares

   

Prior to disposal

After disposal

VBC Energia S.A.

 

9,897,860

 

0

ESC Energia S.A.

 

224,188,344

 

234,086,204

Camargo Correa S.A.

 

11,804,530

 

0

BB Carteira Livre I FIA

 

196,276,558

 

196,276,558

Caixa de Previdência dos Funcionários do Banco do Brasil - Previ

 

9,897,860

 

0

Energia São Paulo FIP

 

90,484,600

 

112,186,990

Bonaire Participações S.A.

 

10,000

 

10,000

Total

 

542,559,752

 

542,559,752

 

37.2 Issuance of debentures:

 

The issue of a single series of unsecured, registered book-entry debentures, not convertible into shares and guaranteed by the Company was approved by Board of Directors meetings of the subsidiaries CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga and RGE on January 31, 2013. The debentures have a term of 8 years from the issue date and mature in February 2021.

 

   

Number

 

Unit per value

 

Total amount raised R$ thousand

 

Annual remuneration

CPFL Paulista

 

50,500

 

10,000

 

505,000

 

CDI + 0,83%

CPFL Piratininga

 

23,500

 

10,000

 

235,000

 

CDI + 0,83%

RGE

 

17,000

 

10,000

 

170,000

 

CDI + 0,83%

 

The funds raised will be used to extend the indebtedness and reinforce the working capital of the subsidiaries. The funds were released on February 22, 2013 for the subsidiaries CPFL Paulista and CPFL Piratininga and on February 27, 2013 for the subsidiary RGE.

 

F - 83


 
 

Table of Contents

 

37.3 – Provisional Measure (“MP”) nº 579/2012, (converted into Law 12,783 in January 2013)  – Extension of the concessions and other topics of interest:

 

 

On September 11, 2012, the Federal Government published MP nº 579, which address the extension of electric energy generation, transmission and distribution concessions. These agreements are affected by articles 19, 17 and 22 of Law nº 9,074/1995 concerning the reduction of sector charges, sliding-scale tariffs and other measures.

 

According to MP n° 579, electric energy generation and distribution concession contracts covered by the MP may be extended, at the discretion of the granting authority, once only, for a term of up to thirty years in order to ensure the continuity efficiency of the service provided, affordable tariffs and fulfillment of economic and operational rationality criteria. The amendments involving generators whose contracts have been extended were signed by the end of 2012. The granting authority has not yet started the extension process for the distributors, including definition of the conditions.

 

In the case of generation, extension depended on express acceptance of the following main conditions: (i) remuneration by means of a tariff calculated by ANEEL for each hydroelectric power plant, (ii) allocation of quotas of physical guarantee of electric energy and of power from the hydroelectric power plant to the public utility concessionaires of electric energy distribution on the National Integrated Grid – SIN, to be defined by ANEEL, in accordance with a regulation by the granting authority; and (iii) acceptance of the service quality standards set by ANEEL. The replacement value methodology (BRR methodology) was used to calculate the amount of compensation, corresponding to the portions of the investments linked to reversible assets not yet amortized nor depreciated, as calculated by the Empresa de Planejamento Energético (“EPE”).

 

The electric energy generation, transmission and distribution concessions that are not extended, as per the terms of this MP, will be offered to third parties, either by auction or tender, for terms of up to thirty years.

 

Of the companies controlled by CPFL Energia, the only ones directly impacted by this MP are the distributors CPFL Jaguari, CPFL Mococa, CPFL Leste Paulista, CPFL Sul Paulista and CPFL Santa Cruz, whose concession agreements expire in July, 2015. These subsidiaries filed for extension of the concessions on June 28, 2012 which were ratified on October 10, 2012, as a result of the changes introduced by MP nº 579. Although it is not possible at this time to determine precisely what impacts this MP will have on these distributors, since the terms of extension will only be known when the Granting Authority releases the draft of the Addendum to the Concession Agreement, Management of the Company and its subsidiaries, in their best judgment, are of the opinion that the effects, if any, will not be significant.

 

In the case of the distributor CPFL Leste Paulista, which has a generation concession which had not yet undergone a deverticalization process, ANEEL informed that the Company will receive the amount of R$ 34,444 as compensation for the basic project for the Rio do Peixe II Plant, as per the official letter nº 186 of December 3, 2012.

 

The other distributors controlled by CPFL Energia have not been directly affected by this MP, as their concessions expire in 2027 and 2028. In order to pass the effects of the MP to the final consumers, ANEEL stipulated an extraordinary reviews (“RTE”) for 2013 for all the electric energy distributors, applied to consumption as from January 24, 2013. This extraordinary review encompassed the electric energy quotas of the generation plants that renewed their concession contracts. The total energy produced by these plants was divided into quotas for the distributors. The effects of the elimination of the Global Reversal Reserve - RGR and Fuel Consumption Account - CCC, the reduction in the Energy Development Account - CDE and decrease in the transmission costs are also computed. Note that this RTE has no impact on profit or loss. The average effects for the distributors’ consumers were:

 

 

F - 84


 
 

Table of Contents

 

Energy distribution

 

Resolution no

 

Consumer's perception (*)

CPFL Paulista

 

1,433

 

-20.42%

CPFL Piratininga

 

1,424

 

-26.70%

RGE

 

1,411

 

-22.81%

CPFL Santa Cruz

 

1,452

 

-23.72%

CPFL Jaguari

 

1,450

 

-25.33%

CPFL Mococa

 

1,451

 

-24.38%

CPFL Leste Paulista

 

1,449

 

-26.42%

CPFL Sul Paulista

 

1,453

 

-23.83%

(*) Information not examined by the independent auditors.

 

With regard to the energy generation segments (conventional and renewable), the Company believes that the MP will not directly affect their business, since their concessions and exploration authorizations granted by ANEEL will only expire as from 2027 and also, their energy sales contacts were contracted by means of Proinfa, Energy Reserve and CCEAR bilateral agreements, the majority of which have 15, 20 and 30 year terms.

 

 

37.4 – Memorandum of Understanding – Rede Group:

 

As per Relevant Fact of December 19, 2012, the Company, Equatorial Energia S.A. (“Equatorial”) and Jorge Queiroz de Moraes Junior (“Controlling Shareholder”) signed a binding “Investment, Purchase and Sale Agreement and Other Covenants” commitment, with the following objective: (i) transfer from the Controlling Shareholder of its controlling stake in Rede Energia S.A. ("Rede") and its controlled subsidiaries ("Acquisition") to Equatorial; and (ii) investment by Equatorial and CPFL Energia of the outlay required for the operational and financial recovery of the companies in the Rede Group, including the electric energy distribution concessionaires controlled by Rede, which are under intervention by ANEEL (“Investment”). The Acquisition will be made for R$ 1.00 (one real) and the Investment will be made through an undefined structure. The final definition depends on the evolution of the preceding conditions, the main effects of which are described below.

 

The Acquisition and the Investment are interlinked transactions, and the main preceding conditions are as follows: (i) prior approval of ANEEL with the consequent release of the interventions in connection with the concessionaires held by Rede; (ii) approval by the Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica – CADE; (iii) approval by creditors of Rede and other companies in the Rede group in the process of court reorganization under the court reorganization plan (iv) obtaining the necessary approval on the part of certain creditors and minority shareholders of the companies involved, in accordance with the pertinent law, contracts and shareholders agreements; and (v) obtaining the pertinent corporate approvals.

 

The Company will keep the market informed in respect of the Investment and definition of the structure.

 

37.5 – Energy Development Account - CDE (“CDE”)

 

Decree 7.945, concerning the pass-through of amounts from the Energy Development Account, or CDE, was published on March 21, 2013. Under this regulation, the CDE is responsible for passing on costs relating to the following items to electricity distributors: (i) hydrological risk; (ii) involuntary exposure in the short term market; (iii) energy security to the extent that thermal power plants are brought into service; and (iv) CVA  for System Service Charge and CVA for purchased energy, as the latter is defined in the ordinary tariff process. The Administration is analyzing the impact of this regulation on the Group's electricity distributors.

 

 

F - 85


 

 

 

Table of Contents

 

( 38 )  CONDENSED UNCONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT

 

Since the condensed unconsolidated financial information required by Rule 12-04 of Regulation S-X is not required under IFRS issued by the International Accounting Standards Board - IASB, such information was not included in the original financial statements filed with the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commissions – CVM. In order to attend the specific requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), Management has incorporated the condensed unconsolidated information in these financial statements as part of the Form 20-F.


The condensed unconsolidated financial information of CPFL Energia, as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the years ended on December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 presented herein were prepared considering the same accounting policies as described in Note 3 to Company’s consolidated financial statements, except for the fact that the investment caption presented in Company’s unconsolidated condensed financial statements were measured under the equity method, instead of being measured at fair value or at cost, as required by International Financial Reporting Standards - IFRSs issued by the IASB, applicable to Separate Financial Statements.

 

UNCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011

 

ASSETS

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

Cash and cash equivalents

141,835

 

549,189

Dividends and Interest on Equity

401,473

 

125,913

Other credits

31,603

 

89,286

Total current assets

574,911

 

764,388

Deferred Taxes Credits

177,411

 

193,874

Investment

6,504,548

 

6,614,915

Other credits

26,831

 

34,616

Total non current assets

6,708,790

 

6,843,405

Total assets

7,283,701

 

7,607,793

       
       

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

Accrued interest on debentures

7,082

 

16,403

Debentures

150,000

 

150,000

Dividends and Interest on Equity

16,856

 

15,575

Other accounts payable

21,221

 

18,279

Total current liabilities

195,159

 

200,258

Debentures

150,000

 

300,000

Reserve for tax, civil and labor risks

12,524

 

11,713

Other accounts payable

29,358

 

28,665

Total non current liabilities

191,882

 

340,378

Shareholders' equity

6,896,660

 

7,067,158

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

7,283,701

 

7,607,793



UNCONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

NET OPERATING REVENUE

1,452

 

1,191

 

1,795

General and administrative expenses and other

(29,585)

 

(175,980)

 

(179,978)

Income from electric energy service

(28,134)

 

(174,789)

 

(178,183)

Interest in subsidiaries

1,331,086

 

1,768,568

 

1,812,140

Financial income/(expense)

(22,084)

 

585

 

(3,287)

Income before taxes

1,280,869

 

1,594,364

 

1,630,670

Social contribution and Income tax

(54,945)

 

(22,072)

 

(35,519)

Net Income

1,225,924

 

1,572,292

 

1,595,151

Comprehensive income for the year

1,225,924

 

1,572,292

 

1,595,151

 

 

 

F - 86


 
 

Table of Contents

 

UNCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010
 

OPERATING CASH FLOW

2012

 

2011

 

2010

Income before taxes

1,280,869

 

1,594,364

 

1,630,670

Adjustment to reconcile income to cash provided by operating activities

         

Interest in subsidiaries

(1,331,086)

 

(1,768,568)

 

(1,812,140)

Depreciation and amortization

65

 

145,359

 

145,452

Other

30,035

 

36,496

 

21,532

Changes in operating assets and liabilities

         

Dividends and Interest on Equity received

1,199,996

 

1,692,403

 

1,317,799

Recoverable taxes

47,539

 

28,249

 

38,945

Other operating assets and liabilities

8,820

 

937

 

2,641

Cash Flows provided by operations

1,236,238

 

1,729,240

 

1,344,899

Payments of interest on debts

(45,080)

 

(51,984)

 

(44,895)

Payment of taxes and social contributions

(39,976)

 

(39,730)

 

(38,003)

Net cash from operating activities

1,151,182

 

1,637,526

 

1,262,001

Investing activities

         

Capital increase in subsidiaries

(66,701)

 

(11,752)

 

-

Financial investments, pledges, funds and tied deposits

49,263

 

46,202

 

43,627

Other

2,236

 

(4,056)

 

9,951

Net cash from used in investing activities

(15,202)

 

30,394

 

53,578

Financing activities

         

Payments of loans, financing and debentures, net of derivatives

(149,827)

 

(121)

 

(198)

Payments of dividend and interest on shareholders’ equity

(1,393,507)

 

(1,229,568)

 

(1,423,550)

Net cash from provide by (used in) financing activities

(1,543,334)

 

(1,229,689)

 

(1,423,748)

(Decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents

(407,354)

 

438,231

 

(108,168)

Opening balance of cash and cash equivalents

549,189

 

110,958

 

219,126

Closing balance of cash and cash equivalents

141,835

 

549,189

 

110,958

 

Following is information relating to CPFL Energia's unconsolidated condensed financial statements presented above:

 

a.     Cash and cash equivalents:

 

 

December 31,
2012

 

December 31,
2011

Bank balances

741

 

723

Investment funds

141,095

 

548,466

Total

141,836

 

549,189

 

Amounts invested in an Exclusive Fund, involving investments subject to floating rates tied to the CDI in federal government bonds, CDBs, secured debentures of major financial institutions, with daily liquidity, low credit risk and interest equivalent, on average, to 101% of  CDI.

 

 

F - 87


 
 

Table of Contents

 

 

b.    Dividends and interest on equity:

 

   

Dividends

 

Interest on Shareholders´ Equity

 

Total

Subsidiaries

 

December 31,
2012

 

December 31,
2011

 

December 31,
2012

 

December 31,
2011

 

December 31,
2012

 

December 31,
2011

CPFL Paulista

 

254,294

 

-

 

12,683

 

-

 

266,978

 

-

CPFL Piratininga

 

88,211

 

-

 

5,879

 

-

 

94,090

 

-

CPFL Santa Cruz

 

14,481

 

-

 

2,043

 

-

 

16,524

 

-

CPFL Sul Paulista

 

5,153

 

6,996

 

1,130

 

1,130

 

6,282

 

8,126

CPFL Jaguari

 

-

 

6,891

 

-

 

790

 

-

 

7,682

RGE

 

-

 

76,413

 

-

 

30,044

 

-

 

106,457

CPFL Planalto

 

5,101

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

5,101

 

-

CPFL Serviços

 

7,139

 

3,648

 

646

 

-

 

7,785

 

3,648

CPFL Atende

 

1,102

 

-

 

357

 

-

 

1,459

 

-

Nect Serviços

 

3,253

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

3,253

 

-

   

378,735

 

93,949

 

22,738

 

31,964

 

401,473

 

125,913

 

c.     Other credits:

 

The mainly account to receive that the Company has in non-current is due to loans and financing guarantee’s subsidiaries.

 

d.    Investment: 

 

The financial information of subsidiaries and jointly-controlled entities and of the associates is accounted for using the equity method which differ from of the Separate Financial Statements, under IFRS which will be measured at cost or fair value.

 

       

Investment
Shareholders Equity Interest

 

Equity in Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries

 

Number of shares (thousand)

 

December 31,
2012

 

December 31,
2011

 

2012

 

2011

CPFL Paulista

 

177,909

 

780,910

 

897,984

 

460,114

 

629,214

CPFL Piratininga

 

53,031,259

 

330,111

 

388,980

 

153,843

 

316,602

CPFL Santa Cruz

 

371,772

 

107,664

 

116,634

 

24,182

 

35,343

CPFL Leste Paulista

 

895,733

 

67,149

 

68,587

 

9,646

 

16,245

CPFL Sul Paulista

 

463,482

 

68,867

 

64,465

 

19,622

 

18,759

CPFL Jaguari

 

212,126

 

43,952

 

43,430

 

10,694

 

13,765

CPFL Mococa

 

121,761

 

38,345

 

37,634

 

7,100

 

7,683

RGE

 

807,168

 

1,326,095

 

1,267,268

 

325,002

 

255,168

CPFL Geração

 

205,487,716

 

2,537,323

 

2,483,750

 

315,912

 

293,852

CPFL Jaguari Geração (*)

 

40,108

 

48,102

 

47,909

 

10,185

 

10,501

CPFL Brasil

 

2,999

 

(81,923)

 

(112,633)

 

105,627

 

147,668

CPFL Planalto (*)

 

630

 

587

 

8,225

 

5,058

 

14,137

CPFL Serviços

 

66,620

 

73,056

 

25,330

 

9,140

 

6,860

CPFL Atende (*)

 

1

 

15,187

 

14,329

 

2,775

 

1,093

Nect (*)

 

2,059

 

4,646

 

3,859

 

5,750

 

1,800

CPFL Total (*)

 

19,005

 

21,555

 

-

 

2,683

 

-

CPFL Jaguariuna (*)

 

189,620

 

2,187

 

1,977

 

209

 

(121)

CPFL Telecom

 

19,900

 

2

 

-

 

(3)

 

-

Subtotal - by shareholders' equity of the subsidiary

 

5,383,816

 

5,357,729

 

1,467,538

 

1,768,568

Goodwill

     

1,120,732

 

1,257,186

       

Amortization of added value on assets

   

-  

 

-

 

(136,453)

 

-

Total

     

6,504,548

 

6,614,915

 

1,331,086

 

1,768,568

(*) Number of quotes

 

Dividends received — The net cash provided by operating activities is comprised mainly by dividends received from the Company’s subsidiaries. The dividends received are comprised as follows:

 

   

2012

 

2011

 

2010

CPFL Paulista

 

305,920

 

772,436

 

355,982

CPFL Piratininga

 

116,634

 

322,453

 

382,952

CPFL Santa Cruz

 

15,936

 

31,709

 

26,606

CPFL Leste Paulista

 

10,738

 

14,224

 

20,997

CPFL Sul Paulista

 

16,681

 

8,267

 

21,008

CPFL Jaguari

 

17,586

 

5,827

 

12,564

CPFL Mococa

 

6,131

 

6,489

 

11,422

RGE

 

362,471

 

57,689

 

245,047

CPFL Geração

 

250,066

 

205,039

 

142,286

CPFL Brasil

 

73,409

 

247,083

 

137,926

CPFL Jaguari Geração

 

9,991

 

8,926

 

5,463

CPFL Planalto

 

7,595

 

12,261

 

9,546

CPFL Serviços

 

3,648

 

-

 

-

CPFL Atende

 

337

 

-

 

-

Chumpitaz

 

1,710

 

-

 

-

CPFL Total

 

1,143

 

-

 

-

TOTAL

 

1,199,996

 

1,692,403

 

1,371,799

 

Restriction of transfer of funds from subsidiaries CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga, CPFL Leste Paulista, CPFL Sul Paulista, CPFL Mococa, CPFL Jaguari, RGE, CPFL Geração, ENERCAN, CERAN, BAESA and Foz do Chapecó qualify as concessionaires. As such, any transfer of funds to the respective parent company, in the form of loans or advances, requires approval by ANEEL. This regulatory restriction does not apply to cash dividends determined in accordance with the Brazilian corporate law.

 

 

F - 88


 
 

Table of Contents

 

As described in note 15, CPFL Paulista, CPFL Piratininga, RGE, CPFL Santa Cruz, CPFL Leste Paulista, CPFL Sul Paulista, ENERCAN, CERAN, BAESA, Foz do Chapecó and Epasa have restrictions relating to the payment of dividends.

 

e.     Accrued interest on debentures and debentures:

 

     

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

     

Interest

 

Current

  

Noncurrent

 

Total

 

Interest

 

Current

 

Noncurrent

 

Total

                                   

3rd Issue

Single series

 

7,082

 

150,000

 

150,000

 

307,082

 

16,403

 

150,000

 

300,000

 

466,403

 

     

Issued

 

Annual Remuneration

 

Annual Effective rate

 

Amortization Conditions

 

Collateral

                       

3rd Issue

Single series

 

45,000

 

CDI + 0.45% (¹)

 

CDI + 0.53%

 

3 annual installments from September 2012

 

Unsecured

                       

(¹) Swap converts the prefixed component of interest on the operation to interest rate variation in reais, corresponding to 104.4% of CDI.

 

 

f.     Other accounts payable:

 

 

The mainly account to pay that the Company has in non-current is due to loans and financing guarantee’s subsidiaries.

 

 

F - 89