NOTICE OF 2014 ANNUAL MEETING
AND
PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

112 West 34th Street
New York, New York 10120

NOTICE OF 2014 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

April 11, 2014

i

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

We are providing this summary of our 2014 Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and the items to be voted on by our shareholders. This is only a summary. For more complete information, please review the complete Proxy Statement and our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Information on the Board of Directors

Named Executive Officers

Our 2013 Results

In 2013, for the third year in a row, Foot Locker, Inc. achieved record sales, earnings, and earnings per share in our history as an athletic footwear and apparel company. Results included:

ii

Proposals and the Board of Directors’ Voting Recommendations

Election of Directors

Four directors are standing for election at this meeting. The following table provides summary information about each of the nominees for director:

Ratification of Appointment of KPMG LLP for 2014

We are asking our shareholders to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2014. The following is a summary of KPMG’s fees for 2013 and 2012:

iii

Approval of an Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation
to Declassify the Board

We are asking shareholders to approve an amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board of Directors. The Certificate of Incorporation currently provides that the Board be divided into three classes serving staggered three-year terms. The proposed amendment provides that, beginning with directors elected in 2015, directors would be elected on an annual basis. Directors elected prior to the effectiveness of the proposed amendment would continue in office until the expiration of their terms of office. A complete copy of the proposed amendment is provided in Appendix A to this proxy statement on Page A-1.

Approval of the Second Amendment and Restatement of the
Foot Locker 2007 Stock Incentive Plan

We are asking shareholders to approve the second amendment and restatement of the Foot Locker 2007 Stock Incentive Plan to increase the aggregate share reserve to 14 million shares, inclusive of shares currently remaining under the Stock Incentive Plan, amend the definition of Change in Control and the vesting provisions of awards following a Change in Control, and make certain clarifying amendments to the plan. There are currently [X] million shares available for grant under the plan. If shareholders approve this proposal, it will result in a net increase of [XX] million shares under the plan. The Board of Directors believes that the proposed increase in the share reserve is necessary to insure that a sufficient reserve of Common Stock remains available to meet anticipated future needs in issuing equity incentives and thereby continuing to align our executives’ and directors’ interests with our shareholders. A summary of the material features of the Foot Locker 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated, is provided beginning on Page 82, and a complete copy of the amended and restated plan is provided in Appendix B beginning on Page B-1.

Advisory Approval of the Named Executive Officers’ Compensation

We are asking shareholders to approve, on a nonbinding, advisory basis, the 2013 compensation of our named executive officers, as described in this proxy statement on Pages 25 through 71. Over the past three years, our shareholders overwhelmingly approved our executive compensation program. Given this strong support, the Compensation and Management Resources Committee decided to retain the overall program, which ties the executives’ pay closely with Foot Locker’s performance. Our 2013 results reflect our diligent execution of the Company’s strategies and represent continued meaningful progress toward the goals contained in our current long-range plan. Based on the Company’s performance, the named executive officers earned annual bonuses for 2013 and long-term incentive payouts for the 2012-2013 performance measurement period payable in 2015.

The above table represents non-GAAP results. We provide a reconciliation to GAAP on Pages 16-17 of our 2013 Form 10-K.

iv

112 West 34th Street
New York, New York 10120

PROXY STATEMENT

GENERAL INFORMATION

We are providing these proxy materials to you for the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Foot Locker, Inc. for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and for any adjournments or postponements of this meeting. We are holding this annual meeting on May 21, 2014 at 9:00 A.M., local time, at our corporate headquarters located at 112 West 34th Street, New York, New York 10120. In this proxy statement we refer to Foot Locker, Inc. as “Foot Locker,” “the Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us.”

We are furnishing proxy materials to our shareholders primarily over the Internet under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s notice and access rules instead of mailing full sets of the printed materials. We believe that this procedure reduces costs, provides greater flexibility to our shareholders, and lessens the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting. On or about April 11, 2014 we started mailing to most of our shareholders in the United States a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Foot Locker Notice”). The Foot Locker Notice contains instructions on how to access and read our 2014 Proxy Statement and our 2013 Annual Report to Shareholders on the Internet and to vote online. If you received a Foot Locker Notice by mail, you will not receive paper copies of the proxy materials in the mail unless you request them. Instead, the Foot Locker Notice instructs you on how to access and read the Proxy Statement and Annual Report and how you may submit your proxy over the Internet. If you received a Foot Locker Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of the materials, please follow the instructions on the Foot Locker Notice for requesting the materials, and we will promptly mail the materials to you.

We are mailing to shareholders, or making available to shareholders via the Internet, this Proxy Statement, form of proxy card, and our 2013 Annual Report/Form10-K on or about April 11, 2014.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THIS ANNUAL MEETING
AND VOTING

What is included in these proxy materials?

The proxy materials include our 2014 Proxy Statement and 2013 Annual Report and Form 10-K. If you received printed copies of these materials by mail, these materials also include the proxy card for this annual meeting.

May I obtain an additional copy of the Form 10-K?

You may obtain an additional copy of our 2013 Form 10-K without charge by writing to our Investor Relations Department at Foot Locker, Inc., 112 West 34th Street, New York, New York 10120. It is also available free of charge through our corporate web site at http://www.footlocker- inc.com/investors.cfm?page=corporate-governance.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

What constitutes a quorum for the Annual Meeting?

We will have a quorum and will be able to conduct the business of the Annual Meeting if the holders of a majority of the shares outstanding are present at the meeting, either in person or by proxy. We will count abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, as present and entitled to vote in determining whether we have a quorum.

What is the record date for this meeting?

The record date for this meeting is March 24, 2014. If you were a Foot Locker shareholder on this date, you are entitled to vote on the items of business described in this proxy statement.

Who may vote at the Annual Meeting?

The only voting securities of Foot Locker are our shares of Common Stock. Only shareholders of record on the books of the Company on March 24, 2014 are entitled to vote at the annual meeting and any adjournments or postponements. Each share is entitled to one vote. There were xxx,xxx,xxx shares of Common Stock outstanding on March 24, 2014.

Can I vote shares held in employee plans?

If you hold shares of Foot Locker Common Stock through the Foot Locker 401(k) Plan or the Foot Locker Puerto Rico 1165(e) Plan, your proxy card includes the number of shares allocated to your plan account. Your proxy card will serve as a voting instruction card for these shares for the plan trustee to vote the shares. The trustee will vote only those shares for which voting instructions have been given. To allow sufficient time for voting by the trustees of these plans, your voting instructions must be received by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on May 18, 2014.

2

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

What proposals are shareholders voting on at this meeting and what are the voting recommendations of the Board of Directors and the vote requirements to approve the proposals?

The proposals that you are being asked to vote on at this Annual Meeting, our Board’s voting recommendations, and the vote required to approve each proposal are shown in the table below:

Could other matters be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

We do not know of any other business that will be presented at the 2014 annual meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the meeting for consideration, then the persons named as proxies will have the discretion to vote on those matters for you using their best judgment.

What happens if I do not vote my shares?

This depends on how you hold your shares and the type of proposal. If you hold your shares in “street name,” such as through a bank or brokerage account, it is important that you cast your vote if you want it to count for Proposals 1, 3, 4 and 5. If you do not instruct your bank or broker how to vote your shares on these proposals, no votes will be cast on your behalf because the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. This is called a “broker non-vote.” With regard to Proposal 2, your bank or broker will have discretion to vote any uninstructed shares for this proposal.

3

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

If you are a “shareholder of record” where your stock ownership is reflected directly on the books and records of the Company’s transfer agent, or if you hold your shares through the Foot Locker 401(k) Plan or Foot Locker 1165(e) Plan, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any of the proposals if you do not cast your vote.

How will the votes be counted?

Votes will be counted and certified by an independent inspector of election.

Votes withheld for the election of one or more of the nominees for director will not be counted as votes cast for them. Except in the case of Proposals 3 and 4, if you abstain from voting or there is a broker non-vote on any matter, your abstention or broker non-vote will not affect the outcome of such vote because abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered to be votes cast. With respect to Proposal 3 to approve the amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation, an abstention and broker non-vote will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. With respect to Proposal 4 to approve the second amendment and restatement of the Foot Locker 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, which is subject to New York Stock Exchange shareholder approval rules, broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of such vote because broker non-votes are not considered votes cast; however, abstentions are counted as votes cast and, therefore, will have the effect of a vote against the proposal.

The Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws do not contain any provisions on the effect of abstentions or broker non-votes.

How do I vote my shares?

You may vote using any of the following methods:

If you are located within the United States or Canada, you can vote your shares by calling 1-800-690-6903 and following the recorded instructions. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day and will be accessible until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on May 20, 2014. The telephone voting system has easy to follow instructions and allows you to confirm that the system has properly recorded your vote. If you vote by telephone, you do NOT need to return a proxy card or voting instruction form.

You can also choose to vote your shares through the Internet at www.proxyvote.com. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day and will be accessible until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on May 20, 2014. As with telephone voting, you will be able to confirm that the system has properly recorded your vote. If you vote via the Internet, you do NOT need to return a proxy card or voting instruction form.

You may also choose to scan the QR Code provided to you to vote your shares through the Internet with your mobile device. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day and will be accessible until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on May 20, 2014. You will be able to confirm that the system has properly recorded your vote. You do NOT need to return a proxy card or voting instruction form if you scan your QR code to vote.

If you received printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you may choose to vote by mail. Simply mark your proxy card or voting instruction form, date and sign it, and return it in the postage-paid envelope that we included with your materials.

4

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

You may also vote by ballot at the Annual Meeting if you decide to attend in person. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the holder of record to be able to vote at the meeting.

All shares that have been properly voted and not revoked will be voted at the Annual Meeting. If you sign and return a proxy card but do not give voting instructions, the shares represented by that proxy card will be voted as recommended by the Board of Directors.

Can I change my mind after voting my shares?

You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is used by (i) sending a written notice to the Company at its corporate headquarters, (ii) delivering a valid proxy card with a later date, (iii) providing a later dated vote by telephone or Internet, or (iv) voting by ballot at the Annual Meeting.

Will my vote be confidential?

We maintain the confidentiality of our shareholders’ votes. All proxy cards, electronic voting, voting instructions, ballots, and voting tabulations identifying shareholders are kept confidential from the Company, except:

Do I need a ticket to attend the Annual Meeting?

You will need an admission ticket to attend the Annual Meeting. Attendance at the meeting will be limited to shareholders on March 24, 2014 (or their authorized representatives) having an admission ticket or proof of their share ownership, and guests of the Company. If you plan to attend the meeting, please indicate this when you are voting by telephone or Internet or check the box on your proxy card, and we will promptly mail an admission ticket to you.

If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker, or other holder of record and you plan to attend the meeting, you can obtain an admission ticket in advance by providing proof of your ownership, such as a bank or brokerage account statement, to the Corporate Secretary at Foot Locker, Inc., 112 West 34th Street, New York, New York 10120. If you do not have an admission ticket, you must show proof of your ownership of the Company’s Common Stock at the registration table at the door.

Who pays the cost of this proxy solicitation?

We will pay for the cost of the solicitation of proxies, including the preparation, printing and mailing of the proxy materials.

Proxies may be solicited, without additional compensation, by our directors, officers, or employees by mail, telephone, fax, in person, or otherwise. We will request banks, brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to deliver proxy materials to the beneficial owners of Foot Locker’s Common Stock and obtain their voting instructions, and we will reimburse those firms for their expenses under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and The New York Stock Exchange. In addition, we have retained Innisfree M&A Incorporated to assist us in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $15,000 plus out-of-pocket expenses.

5

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF THE COMPANY’S STOCK

Directors and Executive Officers

The following table shows the number of shares of Common Stock reported to us as beneficially owned by each of our directors and named executive officers as of March 24, 2014. The table also shows beneficial ownership by all directors, named executive officers, and executive officers as a group on that date, including shares of Common Stock that they have a right to acquire within 60 days after March 24, 2014 by the exercise of stock options.

Ken C. Hicks beneficially owned [1.5x] percent of the total number of outstanding shares of Common Stock as of March 24, 2014. No other director, named executive officer, or executive officer beneficially owned one percent or more of the total number of outstanding shares as of that date. Each person has sole voting and investment power for the number of shares shown unless otherwise noted.

Notes to Beneficial Ownership Table

6

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP

Persons Owning More Than Five Percent of the Company’s Stock

The following table provides information on shareholders who beneficially own more than five percent of our Common Stock according to reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). To the best of our knowledge, there are no other shareholders who beneficially own more than five percent of a class of the Company’s voting securities.

Notes to Table on Persons Owning More than Five Percent of the Company’s Stock

7

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires that our directors and executive officers file with the Securities and Exchange Commission reports of ownership and changes in ownership of Foot Locker’s Common Stock. Based on our records and other information, we believe that during the 2013 fiscal year, the directors and executive officers complied with all applicable SEC filing requirements.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE INFORMATION

The Board of Directors is committed to good corporate governance and has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and other policies and practices to guide the Board and senior management in this area. This section of the proxy statement summarizes our key corporate governance policies and practices.

Our Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors comprises directors having a mix of business experience, education, skills, and service on our Board, as well as on the boards of other organizations. Our Board also reflects diversity in terms of gender, age, and ethnicity. Over the past three years, four new directors have been elected to the Board, three directors retired in accordance with the retirement policy for directors, and a new independent lead director was appointed.

8

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Board periodically reviews the guidelines and may revise them when appropriate. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on the corporate governance section of the Company’s corporate web site at http://www.footlocker-inc.com/investors.cfm?page=corporate-governance. You may also obtain a printed copy of the guidelines by writing to the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s headquarters.

Committee Charters

The Board of Directors has adopted charters for the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Management Resources Committee, the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Copies of the charters for these committees are available on the corporate governance section of the Company’s corporate web site at http://www.footlocker-inc.com/investors.cfm?page=corporate-governance. You may also obtain printed copies of these charters by writing to the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s headquarters.

Policy on Voting for Directors

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that if a nominee for director in an uncontested election receives more votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” election (a “Majority Withheld Vote”), then the director must offer his or her resignation for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Nominating Committee”). The Nominating Committee will evaluate the resignation, weighing the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, and make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on the action to be taken. For example, the Nominating Committee may recommend (i) accepting the resignation, (ii) maintaining the director but addressing what the Nominating Committee believes to be the underlying cause of the withheld votes, (iii) resolving that the director will not be re-nominated in the future for election, or (iv) rejecting the resignation. When making its determination, the Nominating Committee will consider all factors that it deems relevant, including (i) any stated reasons why shareholders withheld votes from the director, (ii) any alternatives for curing the underlying cause of the withheld votes, (iii) the director’s tenure, (iv) the director’s qualifications, (v) the director’s past and expected future contributions to the Board and to the Company, and (vi) the overall composition of the Board, including whether accepting the resignation would cause the Company to fall below the minimum number of directors required under the Company’s By-laws or fail to meet any applicable Securities and Exchange Commission or New York Stock Exchange requirements. We will promptly disclose the Board’s decision on whether or not to accept the director’s resignation, including, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting the offered resignation.

Director Independence

The Board believes that a significant majority of the members of the Board should be independent, as determined by the Board based on the criteria established by The New York Stock Exchange. Each year, the Nominating Committee reviews any relationships between outside directors and the Company that may affect independence. Currently, one of the ten members of the Board of Directors serves as an officer of the Company, and the remaining nine directors are independent under the criteria established by The New York Stock Exchange. Please see Pages 14-16 for more information regarding director independence.

9

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Committee Rotation

As a general principle, the Board believes that the periodic rotation of committee assignments on a staggered basis is desired and provides an opportunity to foster diverse perspective and develop breadth of knowledge within the Board.

Lead Director

We have had a lead director since 2004. The lead director’s responsibilities include reviewing and approving Board agendas; chairing executive sessions of the Board and meetings of the independent directors, both of which are held in conjunction with each quarterly Board meeting; leading the annual review of the Chief Executive Officer’s performance; attending meetings of Board committees; and serving as a liaison between the independent directors and the Chief Executive Officer. The Board of Directors considers the periodic rotation of the lead director from time to time, taking into account experience, continuity of leadership, and the best interests of the Company.

Nicholas DiPaolo currently serves as the lead director. The Board believes that Mr. DiPaolo is well-suited to serve as lead director, given his business and financial background and more than ten years of service on our Board.

Board Leadership Structure

The Board of Directors evaluates, from time to time as appropriate, whether the same person should serve as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, or whether the positions should be split, in light of all relevant factors and circumstances, and what it considers to be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

In recent years, the Board has utilized various leadership structures. For example, from 2001 to 2004, the positions were separated, with a previously independent director serving as Chairman of the Board. From 2004 to 2009, the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer were held by the same person, with an independent member of the Board serving as lead director. From August 2009 to January 2010, the positions were again separated, with the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer serving as Chairman of the Board and an independent member of the Board serving as lead director. Since January 2010, Mr. Hicks has served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer with an independent member of the Board serving as lead director. Nicholas DiPaolo, an independent director, has served as the lead independent director since May 2012.

The Board believes that the current leadership structure is appropriate for the Company in light of the Company’s and the Board’s history of operating effectively when these positions have been combined; the availability of directors such as Mr. DiPaolo to serve as a strong, independent lead director; the size of the Board, which allows a free flow of communication among its members and between the independent members and the Chairman; the important role played by our committee chairs; the independence of our directors; and Mr. Hicks’ background and experience.

Executive Sessions of Non-Management Directors

The Board of Directors holds regularly scheduled executive sessions of non-management directors in conjunction with each quarterly Board meeting. Nicholas DiPaolo, as lead director, presides at these executive sessions.

Board Members’ Attendance at Annual Meetings

Although we do not have a policy on our Board members’ attendance at annual shareholders’ meetings, we encourage each director to attend these important meetings. The annual meeting is

10

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

normally scheduled on the same day as a quarterly Board of Directors’ meeting. In 2013, all of the directors then serving attended the annual shareholders’ meeting.

Director Orientation and Education

We have an orientation program for new directors that is intended to educate a new director on the Company and the Board’s practices. At the orientation, the newly elected director generally meets with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the General Counsel and Secretary, and other senior officers of the Company, to review the business operations, financial matters, investor relations, corporate governance policies, and the composition of the Board and its committees, and succession and development plans. Additionally, he or she has the opportunity to visit our stores at the Company’s New York headquarters, or elsewhere, with a senior division officer for an introduction to store operations. We also provide the Board of Directors with educational training from time to time on subjects applicable to the Board and the Company, including with regard to retailing, accounting, financial reporting, and corporate governance, using both internal and external resources.

Payment of Directors Fees in Stock

The non-employee directors receive one-half of their annual retainer fees, including committee chair and lead director retainer fees, in shares of the Company’s Common Stock, with the balance payable in cash. Directors may elect to receive up to 100 percent of their fees in stock.

Director Retirement

The Board has established a policy in its Corporate Governance Guidelines that directors retire from the Board at the annual meeting of shareholders following the director’s 72nd birthday. As part of the Nominating Committee’s regular evaluation of the Company’s directors and the overall needs of the Board, the Nominating Committee may ask a director to remain on the Board for an additional period of time beyond age 72, or to stand for re-election after reaching age 72. For any director over age 72, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates that director each year in light of the retirement policy to determine his or her continued service on the Board. As described on Page 72, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has asked Nicholas DiPaolo, age 72, to continue to serve on the Board and to stand for re-election in 2014.

Change in a Director’s Principal Employment

The Board has established a policy that any director whose principal employment changes is required to advise the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of this change. If requested by the Chair of the Committee, after consultation with the members of the Committee, the director will submit a letter of resignation to the Chair of the Committee, and the Committee would then meet to consider whether to accept or reject the letter of resignation.

Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors has oversight responsibilities regarding risks that could affect the Company. This oversight is conducted primarily through the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has established procedures for reviewing the Company’s risks. These procedures include regular risk monitoring by Foot Locker management to update current risks and identify potential new and emerging risks, quarterly risk reviews by management with the Audit Committee, and an annual risk report to the full Board of Directors. The Audit Committee Chair reports on the committee’s meetings, considerations, and actions to the full Board at the next Board meeting following each committee meeting. In addition, the Compensation and Management Resources Committee

11

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

considers risk in relation to the Company’s compensation policies and practices. The Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant provides an annual report to the committee on risk relative to the Company’s compensation programs.

The Company believes that this process for risk oversight is appropriate in light of the nature of the Company’s business, its size, and the active participation of senior members of management, including the Chief Executive Officer, in managing risk and holding regular discussions on risk with the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Management Resources Committee, and the Board.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Board of Directors has adopted Stock Ownership Guidelines. The Guidelines were initially adopted in 2006 and were most recently amended as of the start of the 2012 fiscal year. These guidelines cover the Board of Directors, the Chief Executive Officer, and Other Principal Officers. The Guidelines are as follows:

Shares of unvested restricted stock, unvested restricted stock units, and deferred stock units are counted towards beneficial ownership. Performance-based restricted stock units are counted once earned. Stock options and shares held through the Foot Locker 401(k) Plan are disregarded in calculating beneficial ownership.

Non-employee directors and executives who are covered by the guidelines are required to be in compliance within five years after the effective date of becoming subject to these guidelines. In the event of any later increase in the required ownership level, whether as a result of an increase in the annual retainer fee or base salary or an increase in the required ownership multiple, then the target date for compliance with the increased ownership guideline is five years after the effective date of such increase.

All non-employee directors and executives who were required to be in compliance as of the end of the 2013 fiscal year are in compliance. The Company measures compliance with the guidelines at the end of each fiscal year based on the market value of the Company’s stock, with the compliance determination at that point in time applying for the next fiscal year, regardless of fluctuations in the Company’s stock price.

If a director or covered executive fails to be in compliance by the required compliance date, then he or she must hold the net shares obtained through future stock option exercises and the vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units, after payment of applicable taxes, until coming into compliance with the guidelines. In order to take into consideration fluctuations in the Company’s stock price, any person who has been in compliance with the guidelines as of the end of at least one of the two preceding fiscal years and who has not subsequently sold shares will not be subject to this holding requirement. For non-employee directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider a director’s failure to comply with the Guidelines when considering that director for re-election to the Board of Directors.

12

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Political Contributions

Our Code of Business Conduct prohibits making contributions on behalf of the Company to political parties, political action committees, political candidates, or holders of public office. The Company is a member of several trade associations which, as part of their overall activities, may engage in advocacy activities with regard to issues important to the retail industry or the business community generally.

Communications with the Board of Directors

The Board has established a procedure for shareholders and other interested parties to send communications to the non-management members of the Board of Directors. Shareholders and other interested parties who wish to communicate directly with the non-management directors of the Company should send a letter to:

Board of Directors
c/o Secretary, Foot Locker, Inc.
112 West 34th Street
New York, NY 10120

The Secretary will promptly send a copy of the communication to the lead director, who may direct the Secretary to send a copy of the communication to the other non-management directors and may determine whether a meeting of the non-management directors should be called to review the communication.

A copy of the Procedures for Communications with the Board of Directors is available on the corporate governance section of the Company’s corporate web site at http://www.footlocker-inc.com/investors.cfm?page=corporate-governance. You may obtain a printed copy of the procedures by writing to the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s headquarters.

Retention of Outside Advisors

The Board of Directors and all of its committees have authority to retain outside advisors and consultants that they consider necessary or appropriate in carrying out their respective responsibilities. The independent accountants are retained by the Audit Committee and report directly to the Audit Committee. In addition, the Committee is responsible for the selection, assessment, and termination of the internal auditors to which the Company has outsourced a portion of its internal audit function, which is ultimately accountable to the Audit Committee. Similarly, the consultant retained by the Compensation and Management Resources Committee to assist it in the evaluation of senior executive compensation reports directly to that committee.

Code of Business Conduct

The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct for directors, officers and employees, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer. A copy of the Code of Business Conduct is available on the corporate governance section of the Company’s corporate web site at http://www.footlocker-inc.com/investors.cfm?page=corporate-governance. You may obtain a printed copy of the Code of Business Conduct by writing to the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s headquarters.

Any waivers of the Code of Business Conduct for directors and executive officers must be approved by the Audit Committee. We promptly disclose amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and any waivers of the Code for directors and executive officers on the corporate governance section of the Company’s corporate website at http://www.footlocker-inc.com/investors.cfm?page=corporate-governance.

13

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Organization and Powers

The Board of Directors has responsibility for establishing broad corporate policies, reviewing significant developments affecting Foot Locker, and monitoring the general performance of the Company. Our By-laws provide for a Board of Directors consisting of between 7 and 13 directors. The exact number of directors is determined from time to time by the entire Board. Our Board currently has 10 members.

The Board of Directors held five meetings during 2013. All of our directors attended at least 75 percent of the meetings of the Board and committees on which they served in 2013.

Director Qualifications

The Board of Directors, acting through the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, considers its members, including those directors being nominated for reelection to the Board at the 2014 annual meeting, to be qualified for service on the Board due to a variety of factors reflected in each director’s experience, education, areas of expertise, and experience serving on the boards of directors of other organizations. Generally, the Board seeks individuals of broad-based experience who have the background, judgment, independence, and integrity to represent the shareholders in overseeing the Company’s management in their operation of the business rather than specific, niche areas of expertise. Within this framework, specific items relevant to the Board’s determination for each director are listed in each director’s biographical information beginning on Page 73.

Directors’ Independence

A director is considered independent under the rules of the The New York Stock Exchange if he or she has no material or immaterial relationship to the Company that would impair his or her independence. In addition to the independence criteria established by The New York Stock Exchange, the Board of Directors has adopted categorical standards to assist it in making its independence determinations regarding individual members of the Board. These categorical standards are contained in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are posted on the Company’s corporate web site at http://www.footlocker-inc.com/investors.cfm?page=corporate-governance.

The Board of Directors has determined that the categories of relationships listed in the following table are immaterial for purposes of determining whether a director is independent under the listing standards adopted by The New York Stock Exchange.

14

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has determined that the following directors are independent under the rules of The New York Stock Exchange because they have no material or immaterial relationship to the Company that would impair their independence:

James E. Preston, Allen Questrom, and David Y. Schwartz served as directors of the Company during 2013 until their retirement from the Board on May 15, 2013. The Board determined, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, that Mr. Preston, Mr. Questrom, and Mr. Schwartz each was independent under the rules of The New York Stock Exchange through the end of his term as a director because he had no material or immaterial relationship to the Company that would impair his independence.

In making its decisions on independence, the Board of Directors reviewed recommendations of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and considered the following relationships between the Company and organizations with which the current members of our Board are affiliated:

15

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors has determined that all members of the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Management Resources Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent as defined under the listing standards of The New York Stock Exchange and the director independence standards adopted by the Board.

Related Person Transactions

We individually inquire of each of our directors and executive officers about any transactions in which Foot Locker and any of these related persons or their immediate family members are participants. We also make inquiries within the Company’s records for information on any of these kinds of transactions. Once we gather the information, we then review all relationships and transactions in which Foot Locker and any of our directors, executive officers or their immediate family members are participants to determine, based on the facts and circumstances, whether the Company or the related persons have a direct or indirect material interest. The General Counsel’s office coordinates the related person review process. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews any reported transactions involving directors and their immediate families in making its recommendation to the Board of Directors on the independence of the directors. The Company’s written policies and procedures for related person transactions are included within the Corporate Governance Guidelines and Foot Locker’s Code of Business Conduct. There were no related party transactions in 2013.

Committees of the Board of Directors

The Board has delegated certain duties to committees, which assist the Board in carrying out its responsibilities. There are five standing committees of the Board. Each director serves on at least two committees. The current committee memberships, the number of meetings held during 2013, and the functions of the committees are described below.

Audit Committee

The committee held nine meetings in 2013. The Audit Committee has a charter, which is available on the corporate governance section of our corporate web site at http://www.footlocker-inc.com/investors. cfm?page=corporate-governance. The report of the Audit Committee appears on Page 80.

16

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

This committee appoints the independent accountants and is responsible for approving the independent accountants’ compensation. This committee also assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in the following areas:

The Audit Committee has established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters.

The Board of Directors has determined that Matthew M. McKenna, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under the rules of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, through his relevant experience as a senior financial executive of a large multinational corporation. Mr. McKenna is independent under the rules of The New York Stock Exchange and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Compensation and Management Resources Committee

The Compensation and Management Resources Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) held six meetings in 2013. The committee has a charter, which is available on the corporate governance section of the Company’s corporate web site at http://www.footlocker-inc.com/
investors.cfm?page=corporate-governance.

The Compensation Committee determines the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, reviews and approves all compensation for the Company’s executive management group, which consists of the executive officers and corporate officers, and determines significant elements of the compensation of the chief executive officers of our operating divisions. Decisions regarding equity compensation for other employees are also the Compensation Committee’s responsibility. Decisions regarding non-equity compensation of the Company’s other associates are made by the Company’s management. The committee also considers risk in relation to the Company’s compensation policies and practices.

The Compensation Committee also administers Foot Locker’s various compensation plans, including the incentive plans, the equity-based compensation plans, and the employees stock purchase plan. Other than the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, committee members are not eligible to participate in these compensation plans. This committee also reviews and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning executive development and succession, including for the position of Chief Executive Officer.

At the beginning of each year, the Compensation Committee holds a meeting with management, the Company’s compensation consultant, and the Committee’s independent compensation consultant to review the overall executive compensation environment, including recent developments in executive compensation, and the Company’s executive compensation program, including a historical view of the pay-for-performance correlation in the program and any changes to the program being recommended by management or either of the consultants.

The Committee then holds a second meeting, in March, after the financial results for the prior year have been finalized and audited, to review and approve bonus and incentive compensation payments for the prior year and to review and approve compensation arrangements—base salaries, stock awards, and incentive plan targets—for the upcoming year. The Committee meets privately

17

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

with its independent consultant for the purpose of establishing the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, including establishing target awards under the Annual Bonus Plan and the long-term incentive compensation program, and making stock awards to him. Except in the case of promotions or other unusual circumstances, the Compensation Committee considers stock awards only at its March meeting, which is normally held within a few weeks following the issuance of the Company’s full-year earnings release for the prior year.

The Committee may hold other meetings during the year to review specific issues related to executive compensation, new developments in executive compensation, or other management resources related topics. It also has responsibility, along with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, for annually reviewing compensation paid to non-employee directors. In 2013, the Compensation Committee held a total of six meetings.

The Compensation Committee has retained as its advisor a nationally recognized executive compensation consultant—Compensation Advisory Partners—that is independent and performs no other work for the Company. Compensation Advisory Partners is retained directly by the Compensation Committee, reports to it directly, meets with the Committee privately, without management present, and regularly communicates privately with the Chair of the Committee. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Compensation Advisory Partners based on standards promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent it from serving as an independent consultant to the Committee. Each year, the Committee’s compensation consultant reviews a report on risk in relation to the Company’s compensation policies and practices, provides a pay-for-performance analysis of our executive compensation program, and reviews the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation. Management utilizes the services of ClearBridge Compensation Group, a nationally recognized compensation consultant, to provide advice on the executive compensation program and plan design.

Management is involved in various aspects of developing the executive compensation program. Our Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer, Vice President—Human Resources, and staff in the Human Resources Department work with our Chief Executive Officer to develop compensation recommendations for all corporate officers other than the Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer or the Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer reviews these proposals with the Chair of the Compensation Committee, and may make changes to the recommendations based upon his input, before the recommendations are forwarded to the Compensation Committee for review. Our Senior Vice President and General Counsel and Vice President and Associate General Counsel also attend meetings of the Compensation Committee and participate in some of these discussions and preparations.

The Compensation Committee has delegated authority to its Chair to approve stock option awards of up to 25,000 shares to any single employee other than a corporate officer. The Chair generally uses this authority to approve stock option grants made during the course of the year in connection with promotions or new hires.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Nicholas DiPaolo, Alan D. Feldman, James E. Preston, Allen Questrom, Cheryl Nido Turpin, and Dona D. Young served on the Compensation and Management Resources Committee during 2013. None of the committee members was an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, and there were no interlocks with other companies within the meaning of the SEC’s proxy rules.

18

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Finance and Strategic Planning Committee

The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee held five meetings in 2013. This committee reviews the overall strategic and financial plans of the Company, including capital expenditure plans, proposed debt or equity issues of the Company, and the Company’s capital structure. The committee also considers and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning dividend payments and share repurchases, and reviews acquisition and divestiture proposals.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings in 2013. This committee has responsibility for overseeing corporate governance matters affecting the Company, including developing and recommending criteria and policies relating to service and tenure of directors. The committee is responsible for collecting the names of potential nominees to the Board, reviewing the background and qualifications of potential candidates for Board membership, and making recommendations to the Board for the nomination and election of directors. The committee reviews membership on the Board committees and, after consultation with the lead director and the Chief Executive Officer, makes recommendations to the Board regarding committee members and committee chair assignments annually. In addition, the committee meets jointly with the Compensation and Management Resources Committee to review directors’ compensation and make recommendations to the Board concerning the form and amount of directors’ compensation.

While the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a formal policy regarding board diversity, the Foot Locker Board reflects diversity in terms of gender, experience and ethnicity. In selecting new directors and considering the re-nomination of existing directors, the Committee considers a variety of factors that it believes contribute to an individual’s ability to be an effective director, as well as the overall effectiveness of the Board. These include independence, integrity, high personal and professional ethics, sound business judgment, and the ability and willingness to devote sufficient time to Board responsibilities. The Committee also considers an individual’s understanding of business, finance, corporate governance, marketing, and other disciplines relevant to the oversight of a large publicly traded company; understanding of our industry; educational and professional background; international experience; personal accomplishment; community involvement; and cultural and ethnic diversity. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may establish criteria for candidates for Board membership. These criteria may include area of expertise, diversity of experience, independence, commitment to representing the long-term interests of the Company’s stakeholders, and other relevant factors, taking into consideration the needs of the Board and the Company and the mix of expertise and experience among current directors. From time to time the committee may retain the services of a third party search firm to identify potential director candidates.

After a potential nominee is identified, the Committee Chair will review his or her biographical information and discuss with the other members of the committee whether to request additional information about the individual or to schedule a meeting with the potential candidate. The committee’s determination on whether to proceed with a formal evaluation of a potential candidate is based on the person’s experience and qualifications, as well as the current composition of the Board and its anticipated future needs.

Shareholders who wish to recommend candidates may contact the Committee in the manner described on Page 13 under “Communications with the Board of Directors.” Shareholder nominations must be made according to the procedures required under our By-laws and within the timeframe described in the By-laws and on Page 93 of this proxy statement. Shareholder-recommended candidates and shareholder nominees whose nominations comply with these procedures will be evaluated by the Committee in the same manner as the Committee’s nominees.

19

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee did not meet in 2013. Except for certain matters reserved to the Board, this committee has all of the powers of the Board in the management of the business of the Company during intervals between Board meetings.

Directors’ Compensation and Benefits

Non-employee directors are paid an annual retainer fee and meeting fees for attendance at each Board and committee meeting. The lead director and the committee chairs are paid an additional retainer fee for service in these capacities. We do not pay additional compensation to any director who is also an employee of the Company for service on the Board or any committee. The table below summarizes the fees paid to the non-employee directors in 2013.

Summary of Directors’ Compensation

Deferral Election

Non-employee directors may elect to receive all or a portion of the cash component of their annual retainer fee, including committee chair retainers, in the form of deferred stock units or to have these amounts placed in an interest account. Directors may also elect to receive all or part of the stock component of their annual retainer fee in the form of deferred stock units. The interest account is a hypothetical investment account bearing interest at the rate of 120 percent of the

20

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

applicable federal long-term rate, compounded annually, and set as of the first day of each plan year. A stock unit is an accounting equivalent of one share of the Company’s Common Stock.

Miscellaneous

Directors and their immediate families are eligible to receive the same discount on purchases of merchandise from our stores, catalogs and Internet sites that is available to Company employees. The Company reimburses non-employee directors for their reasonable expenses in attending meetings of the Board and committees, including their transportation expenses to and from meetings, hotel accommodations, and meals.

Fiscal 2013 Director Compensation

The amounts paid to each non-employee director for fiscal 2013, including amounts deferred under the Company’s stock plan, and the RSUs granted to each director are reported in the tables below. Mr. Oakland did not serve as a director during 2013, so no compensation is reported for him in the table.

Director Compensation

Notes to Director Compensation Table

21

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

- Stock portion of retainer fee: In 2013, we made the annual stock payment to each director on July 1. Under the terms of the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, the stock payment was valued at the closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock on June 28, which was $35.13. The 2013 grant date fair value is equal to the number of shares received or deferred by the director multiplied by $35.13, calculated in accordance with stock-based compensation accounting rules (ASC Topic 718). Directors who deferred the stock portion of their annual retainer were credited with deferred stock units on the annual payment date valued at $35.13 per unit.

- Cash portion of retainer fee: For fiscal 2013, two directors deferred part of the cash portion of their annual retainer fees and were credited during the fiscal year with deferred stock units on the quarterly cash retainer payment dates, valued at the fair market value on the payment dates, as follows: January 2, 2013 ($31.60; pro rated for 2 months of fiscal year), April 1, 2013 ($33.82), July 1, 2013 ($35.36), and October 1, 2013 ($34.01). The 2013 grant date fair value is equal to the number of deferred stock units received multiplied by the fair market value on the payment dates, calculated in accordance with stock-based compensation accounting rules (ASC Topic 718).

22

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Total Number of Deferred Stock Units credited to directors’ accounts for fiscal 2013, including the dividend equivalents and the units credited representing 2013 retainer fees reported in the above two tables, and the total number of units held at the end of fiscal 2013, are reported in the following table:

23

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Directors’ Retirement Plan

The Directors’ Retirement Plan was frozen as of December 31, 1995. Consequently, only Jarobin Gilbert Jr. and James E. Preston remained entitled to receive a benefit under this plan when their service as directors ends because they had completed at least five years of service as directors on December 31, 1995. The retirement benefit under this plan is an annual retirement benefit of $24,000 that is payable quarterly for a period of 10 years after the director leaves the Board or until their death, if sooner. Mr. Preston retired from the Board in May 2013, and he is currently receiving a benefit under this plan.

Directors and Officers Indemnification and Insurance

We have purchased directors and officers liability and corporation reimbursement insurance from a group of insurers comprising ACE American Insurance Co., Zurich American Insurance Co., Arch Insurance Co., St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co., Freedom Specialty Insurance Co., Berkley Insurance Co., Navigators Insurance Co., Aspen American Insurance Co., XL Insurance Bermuda Ltd., and Illinois National Insurance Co. These policies insure the Company and all of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries. They also insure all of the directors and officers of the Company and the covered subsidiaries. The policies were written for a term of 12 months, from October 12, 2013 until October 12, 2014. The total annual premium for these policies, including fees and taxes, is $1,050,835. Directors and officers of the Company, as well as all other employees with fiduciary responsibilities under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, are insured under policies issued by a group of insurers comprising Arch Insurance Co., St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co., Federal Insurance Co., and Continental Casualty Co., which have a total premium, including fees and taxes, of $367,988 for the 12- month period ending October 12, 2014.

The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and officers, as approved by shareholders at the 1987 annual meeting.

24

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation and Risk

The Company has completed a risk-related review and assessment of our compensation program and considered whether our executive compensation is reasonably likely to result in a material adverse effect on the Company. As part of this review, the independent compensation consultant to the Compensation and Management Resources Committee reviewed risk in relation to the Company’s compensation policies and practices with the Company’s human resources executives directly involved in compensation matters. The consultant reviewed the compensation policies and practices in effect for corporate and division employees through the manager level, store managers, and store associates and reviewed the features we have built into the compensation programs to discourage excessive risk taking by employees, including a balance between different elements of compensation, differing time periods for different elements, consistent Company-wide programs, plan performance targets based on the corporate budgeting process, and stock ownership guidelines for senior management.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This section explains our executive compensation program as it relates to the following “named executive officers” whose compensation information is presented in the tables following this discussion and analysis:

Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate, and retain talented retail company executives in order to maintain and enhance the Company’s performance and its return to shareholders. In order to accomplish this, we have a compensation program for our executives that ties pay closely to performance. The more senior an executive’s position, the greater the portion of his or her compensation that is tied to performance. The Compensation and Management Resources Committee (the “Compensation Committee”), composed of five independent directors, oversees the executive compensation program.

2013 Summary

This summary is intended to highlight certain features of our performance and our executive compensation program in 2013. Please refer to the entire Compensation Discussion and Analysis that follows the 2013 Summary for more detailed and specific information on our program.

Our 2013 Results. In 2013, for the third year in a row, we achieved record sales, earnings, and earnings per share in our history as an athletic footwear and apparel company. Results included:

25

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

These results represent continued strong progress toward the long-term objectives contained in the updated long-range strategic plan that we adopted in early 2012, as shown in the following table:

The above table represents non-GAAP results. There is a reconciliation to GAAP on Pages 16-17 of our 2013 Form 10-K.

Base Salaries. The Chief Executive Officer’s base salary was unchanged in 2013 from 2012. As part of the Compensation Committee’s normal annual compensation review, the other named executive officers (other than Ms. Alviti) received base salary increases ranging from 3.2 to 10 percent, which were based on the executive’s performance and a position-oriented analysis of peer group salaries. Ms. Alviti joined the Company in June 2013, and her base salary was established based upon the salary range for her position and her prior experience and compensation level.

Annual Bonus. Both our annual bonus and long-term incentive programs are formula-driven, with targets established by the Compensation Committee based upon financial targets included in the business plan approved each year by our Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and Board of Directors. Our annual and long-term bonus programs for the named executive officers pay out based upon the Company’s results, without individual performance adjustments.

At the beginning of 2013, the Compensation Committee established a performance target under the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Annual Bonus Plan”) based on the Company achieving pre-tax income of $666.1 million, a 6.8 percent increase over 2012 pre-tax income. In 2013, the Company achieved adjusted pre-tax income of $665.5 million, a 6.7 percent increase over 2012, and slightly less than the target, which resulted in annual cash bonuses slightly below the target payout of 124.1 percent of base salary for the Chief Executive Officer, 74.5 percent of base salary for the Chief Operating Officer, 64.5 percent of base salary for the other executive vice presidents, and 50 percent for Ms. Alviti (whose first year annual bonus was guaranteed at target).

Long-Term Incentive Programs. At the beginning of 2012, the Compensation Committee established performance targets for the 2012-13 performance period under the long-term incentive program. The amount earned for the two-year 2012-2013 performance period will not be paid to participants until 2015, following the completion of an additional one-year holding period. The targets that the Committee established were based on the Company achieving average annual net income of $346.2 million (which accounts for 70% of the payout) and ROIC of 12.8 percent (which accounts for 30% of the payout). For the period, the Company achieved average annual net income of $418.6 million and ROIC of 15.0 percent. As a result, the named executive officers earned a maximum payout for the performance period - for Mr. Hicks, 350 percent of initial base salary; for Mr. Johnson 200 percent of initial base salary; and for the other named executive officers, 150 percent of initial base salary. Payouts will be calculated and made one-half in cash and one-half in restricted stock units (“RSUs”). Ms. Alviti’s payout under the long-term program is pro rated based upon her period of service with the Company as a percentage of the total performance period.

In 2013, the Compensation Committee established long-term incentive performance targets for the 2013-2014 performance period based upon net income (70%) and ROIC (30%) denominated one-half in cash and one-half in RSUs. The Committee will determine whether payouts have been earned for that performance period following the end of 2014. If payouts are earned, they will be calculated

26

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

one-half in cash and one-half in RSUs, and payment will be made to participating executives in 2016 following an additional one-year holding period.

Our annual bonus and long-term incentive programs are performance-based. When we meet or exceed our targets, payments are made to participants, including the named executive officers. When we do not, no payments are made. Following is a five-year history of bonus payments to our named executive officers:

Stock Options. The Compensation Committee granted stock options to each of the named executive officers in 2013. As part of its normal annual compensation review, the Committee awarded options to purchase the number of shares of common stock to each of the named executive officers shown in the following chart:

When determining the number of stock options to grant, the Compensation Committee considered an assumed Black-Scholes value, shown in the chart, which was based on the closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock in the 20 trading day period ending 10 days prior to the date the Committee met to authorize these awards. The option exercise price, as well as the actual Black-Scholes value of the awards, is based upon the closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. All of the options granted have a three-year vesting schedule, with one-third of each option grant vesting on the first, second, and third anniversary of the grant date, subject to continuous service through each vesting date.

Ms. Alviti. When she joined the Company in June 2013, Ms. Alviti was awarded a stock option grant of 21,000 options, vesting in three equal annual installments, the same number of options granted to the Company’s other Senior Vice Presidents in 2013. As additional sign-on compensation to compensate her for incentive compensation and stock and other awards she forfeited upon termination of her employment with her prior employer, Ms. Alviti received (i) a cash payment of $126,563 and 6,718 restricted stock units, to be payable and vest in March 2014, comparable to a pro-rated payout under the long-term incentive program payable to other senior executives in 2014, and (ii) a restricted stock award of 30,000 shares, vesting in three equal annual installments.

Special Stock Awards to Mr. Hicks. In addition to the stock option award made to Mr. Hicks as part of the Compensation Committee’s normal annual compensation review, as shown in the chart above, in 2013 the Compensation Committee also made two special stock awards to Mr. Hicks. These were made in light of the Company’s performance in 2012, when, under the leadership of Mr. Hicks, the Company achieved record sales, earnings, earnings per share, and return-on-invested-capital in our history as an athletic footwear and apparel company. These awards were:

27

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The value shown for the stock option award is the assumed Black-Scholes value; the value shown for the restricted stock award is the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the grant date.

Key Compensation Policies. In addition to the specific compensation programs outlined above, the Company has adopted a number of other policies related to executive compensation: