10-Q
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-13107
AutoNation, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
73-1105145
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
110 S.E. 6th Street, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
33301
(Zip Code) |
(954) 769-6000
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of July 27, 2009, the registrant had 178,023,867 shares of common stock outstanding.
AUTONATION, INC.
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
AUTONATION, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
128.9 |
|
|
$ |
110.1 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
330.6 |
|
|
|
369.7 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
1,257.9 |
|
|
|
1,749.9 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
328.5 |
|
|
|
498.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
2,045.9 |
|
|
|
2,727.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net of accumulated depreciation
of $600.3 million and $634.8 million, respectively |
|
|
1,742.8 |
|
|
|
1,798.4 |
|
GOODWILL, NET (Note 4) |
|
|
1,121.5 |
|
|
|
1,122.0 |
|
OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET (Note 4) |
|
|
175.9 |
|
|
|
177.7 |
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|
|
151.1 |
|
|
|
188.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
5,237.2 |
|
|
$ |
6,014.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle floorplan payable - trade |
|
$ |
901.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,352.4 |
|
Vehicle floorplan payable - non-trade |
|
|
299.6 |
|
|
|
453.4 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
128.5 |
|
|
|
134.4 |
|
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term obligations |
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
368.2 |
|
|
|
482.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
1,711.2 |
|
|
|
2,455.8 |
|
LONG-TERM DEBT, NET OF CURRENT MATURITIES |
|
|
1,119.2 |
|
|
|
1,225.6 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
OTHER LIABILITIES |
|
|
116.4 |
|
|
|
134.6 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share; 5,000,000 shares
authorized; none issued |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 1,500,000,000 shares
authorized; 193,562,149 shares issued at June 30, 2009, and
December 31, 2008, including shares held in treasury |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
484.6 |
|
|
|
481.8 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,094.3 |
|
|
|
2,023.0 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost; 15,565,959 and 16,708,866
shares held, respectively |
|
|
(290.0 |
) |
|
|
(307.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
2,290.4 |
|
|
|
2,198.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
5,237.2 |
|
|
$ |
6,014.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
1
AUTONATION, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New vehicle |
|
$ |
1,339.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,062.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,524.5 |
|
|
$ |
4,133.7 |
|
Used vehicle |
|
|
632.6 |
|
|
|
868.6 |
|
|
|
1,224.8 |
|
|
|
1,771.6 |
|
Parts and service |
|
|
537.4 |
|
|
|
588.2 |
|
|
|
1,075.3 |
|
|
|
1,191.9 |
|
Finance and insurance, net |
|
|
89.0 |
|
|
|
128.4 |
|
|
|
166.0 |
|
|
|
265.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL REVENUE |
|
|
2,609.6 |
|
|
|
3,663.6 |
|
|
|
5,015.5 |
|
|
|
7,395.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New vehicle |
|
|
1,252.8 |
|
|
|
1,925.6 |
|
|
|
2,364.3 |
|
|
|
3,858.9 |
|
Used vehicle |
|
|
574.3 |
|
|
|
793.3 |
|
|
|
1,102.8 |
|
|
|
1,618.2 |
|
Parts and service |
|
|
301.5 |
|
|
|
330.9 |
|
|
|
603.0 |
|
|
|
671.9 |
|
Other |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL COST OF SALES |
|
|
2,133.1 |
|
|
|
3,057.2 |
|
|
|
4,080.7 |
|
|
|
6,163.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New vehicle |
|
|
86.3 |
|
|
|
136.4 |
|
|
|
160.2 |
|
|
|
274.8 |
|
Used vehicle |
|
|
58.3 |
|
|
|
75.3 |
|
|
|
122.0 |
|
|
|
153.4 |
|
Parts and service |
|
|
235.9 |
|
|
|
257.3 |
|
|
|
472.3 |
|
|
|
520.0 |
|
Finance and insurance |
|
|
89.0 |
|
|
|
128.4 |
|
|
|
166.0 |
|
|
|
265.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL GROSS PROFIT |
|
|
476.5 |
|
|
|
606.4 |
|
|
|
934.8 |
|
|
|
1,231.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses |
|
|
364.1 |
|
|
|
451.4 |
|
|
|
717.6 |
|
|
|
910.8 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
42.7 |
|
Franchise rights impairment |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other expenses (income), net |
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(21.3 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
102.3 |
|
|
|
134.1 |
|
|
|
198.0 |
|
|
|
277.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floorplan interest expense |
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
(19.7 |
) |
|
|
(19.1 |
) |
|
|
(42.5 |
) |
Other interest expense |
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
|
|
(21.6 |
) |
|
|
(22.3 |
) |
|
|
(48.4 |
) |
Gain on senior note repurchases |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Interest income |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Other gains (losses), net |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME FROM CONTINUING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
86.9 |
|
|
|
94.1 |
|
|
|
171.5 |
|
|
|
186.8 |
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
63.7 |
|
|
|
76.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
55.5 |
|
|
|
107.8 |
|
|
|
110.6 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
(36.5 |
) |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
36.7 |
|
|
$ |
51.8 |
|
|
$ |
71.3 |
|
|
$ |
102.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
Net income |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
177.8 |
|
|
|
178.0 |
|
|
|
177.3 |
|
|
|
179.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
Net income |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
178.8 |
|
|
|
178.7 |
|
|
|
178.0 |
|
|
|
179.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING, net of
treasury stock |
|
|
178.0 |
|
|
|
176.7 |
|
|
|
178.0 |
|
|
|
176.7 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
2
AUTONATION, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(In millions, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Loss |
|
Stock |
|
Total |
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2008 |
|
|
193,562,149 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
481.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,023.0 |
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(307.9 |
) |
|
$ |
2,198.1 |
|
Exercise of stock options, including |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
income tax benefit of $2.5 million |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Net income |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
71.3 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
71.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 2009 |
|
|
193,562,149 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
484.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,094.3 |
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(290.0 |
) |
|
$ |
2,290.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
3
AUTONATION, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
71.3 |
|
|
$ |
102.5 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
36.5 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
42.7 |
|
Amortization of debt issue costs and discounts |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Stock option expense |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
Deferred income tax provision |
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Franchise rights impairment |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Non-cash impairment charges |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Gain on senior note repurchases |
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Gain on corporate headquarters sale-leaseback |
|
|
(12.9 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Net gain on asset sales and dispositions |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Other |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from
business combinations and divestitures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
138.4 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
492.7 |
|
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
Vehicle floorplan payable-trade, net |
|
|
(451.3 |
) |
|
|
50.7 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
(15.6 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(36.6 |
) |
|
|
(12.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing operations |
|
|
208.5 |
|
|
|
323.8 |
|
Net cash provided by discontinued operations |
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
230.9 |
|
|
|
330.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(34.1 |
) |
|
|
(39.2 |
) |
Property operating lease buy-outs |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Proceeds from assets held for sale |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Insurance recoveries on property and equipment |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Cash used in business acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(29.4 |
) |
Net change in restricted cash |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
Purchases of restricted investments |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of restricted investments |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Cash received from business divestitures, net of cash relinquished |
|
|
40.5 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations |
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
(62.2 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
|
(62.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
4
AUTONATION, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(55.9 |
) |
Repurchase of floating rate senior unsecured notes |
|
|
(31.2 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Repurchase of 7% senior unsecured notes |
|
|
(33.5 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Proceeds from revolving credit facility |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
519.0 |
|
Payment of revolving credit facility |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(779.0 |
) |
Net payments of vehicle floor plan payable non-trade |
|
|
(154.8 |
) |
|
|
61.5 |
|
Payments of mortgage facilities |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Payments of notes payable and long-term debt |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Tax benefit from stock options |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in continuing operations |
|
|
(211.2 |
) |
|
|
(251.6 |
) |
Net cash used in discontinued operations |
|
|
(22.8 |
) |
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(234.0 |
) |
|
|
(258.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS at beginning of period |
|
|
110.1 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS at end of period |
|
$ |
128.9 |
|
|
$ |
42.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5
AUTONATION, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions, except share and per share data)
1. INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Business and Basis of Presentation
AutoNation, Inc., through its subsidiaries, is the largest automotive retailer in the United
States. As of June 30, 2009, we owned and operated 264 new vehicle franchises from 210 stores
located in major metropolitan markets, predominantly in the Sunbelt region of the United States.
We offer a diversified range of automotive products and services, including new vehicles, used
vehicles, parts and automotive repair and maintenance services, and automotive finance and
insurance products. We also arrange financing for vehicle purchases through third-party finance
sources. For convenience, the terms AutoNation, Company, and we are used to refer
collectively to AutoNation, Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless otherwise required by the context.
Our dealership operations are conducted by our subsidiaries.
The accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of
AutoNation, Inc. and its subsidiaries; all significant intercompany accounts and transactions have
been eliminated. The accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been
prepared by us pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). Accordingly, certain information related to our organization, significant accounting
policies, and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States has been condensed or omitted.
These Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect, in the opinion of management,
all material adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly
state, in all material respects, our financial position and results of operations for the periods
presented.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
reporting period. In preparing these financial statements, management has made its best estimates
and judgments of certain amounts included in the financial statements, giving due consideration to
materiality. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and other assumptions
that we believe are reasonable. However, application of these accounting policies involves the
exercise of judgment and use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual
results could differ materially from these estimates. We periodically evaluate estimates and
assumptions used in the preparation of the financial statements and make changes on a prospective
basis when adjustments are necessary. Significant estimates made by AutoNation in the accompanying
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include certain assumptions related to
goodwill, intangible, and long-lived assets, allowances for doubtful accounts, accruals for
chargebacks against revenue recognized from the sale of finance and insurance products, accruals
related to self-insurance programs, certain legal proceedings, estimated tax liabilities, estimated
losses from disposals of discontinued operations, and certain assumptions related to stock option
compensation.
Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that can
be expected for a full year. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with
our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our most recent Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
Certain reclassifications of amounts previously reported have been made to the accompanying
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in order to maintain consistency and
comparability between periods presented.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 165, Subsequent Events. SFAS No. 165 establishes
general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet
date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS No. 165 is
effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS
No. 165 did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements for the three months ended
June 30, 2009, as it is our continuing policy to evaluate subsequent events through the date our
financial statements are issued. For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, we have evaluated
subsequent events through July 31, 2009, which is the date our financial statements were issued and
filed with the SEC.
6
AUTONATION, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162.
SFAS No. 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the ASC) as the source of
authoritative principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP). Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws
are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. SFAS No. 168 is effective for
financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. We do
not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 168 will have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements. However, references to authoritative accounting literature contained in our
financial statements will be made in accordance with the ASC commencing with our quarterly report
for the period ending September 30, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141R is a
revision to SFAS No. 141 and includes substantial changes to the acquisition method used to account
for business combinations (formerly the purchase accounting method), including broadening the
definition of a business, as well as revisions to accounting methods for contingent consideration
and other contingencies related to the acquired business, accounting for transaction costs, and
accounting for adjustments to provisional amounts recorded in connection with acquisitions. SFAS
No. 141R retains the fundamental requirement of SFAS No. 141 that the acquisition method of
accounting be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each
business combination. SFAS No. 141R is applied prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. We adopted SFAS No. 141R effective January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS
No. 141R did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157
defines fair value and applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 was effective for
financial assets and liabilities in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.
Our adoption of the provisions of SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008, with respect to financial
assets and liabilities measured at fair value, did not have a material impact on our fair value
measurements or our financial statements. Our adoption of the provisions of SFAS No. 157 on
January 1, 2009, with respect to nonfinancial assets and liabilities, including the valuation of our reporting units for the purpose of assessing goodwill impairment, the
valuation of our franchise rights when assessing franchise impairments, the valuation of property
and equipment when assessing long-lived asset impairment, and the valuation of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in
business combinations, did not have a material impact on our fair value measurements or our
financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. See Note 16 of the Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for disclosures of our fair value
measurements.
7
AUTONATION, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
2. |
|
RECEIVABLES, NET |
|
|
|
The components of receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
$ |
79.0 |
|
|
$ |
96.3 |
|
Manufacturer receivables |
|
|
87.8 |
|
|
|
103.2 |
|
Other |
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197.4 |
|
|
|
221.7 |
|
Less: Allowances |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192.3 |
|
|
|
215.5 |
|
Contracts-in-transit and vehicle receivables |
|
|
128.2 |
|
|
|
141.7 |
|
Income tax refundable (See Note 6) |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
330.6 |
|
|
$ |
369.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts-in-transit and vehicle receivables primarily represent receivables from financial
institutions for the portion of the vehicle sales price financed by our customers.
3. |
|
INVENTORY AND VEHICLE FLOORPLAN PAYABLE |
|
|
|
The components of inventory are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New vehicles |
|
$ |
954.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,485.9 |
|
Used vehicles |
|
|
194.3 |
|
|
|
139.7 |
|
Parts, accessories, and other |
|
|
109.6 |
|
|
|
124.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,257.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,749.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of vehicle floorplan payables are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle floorplan payable trade |
|
$ |
901.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,352.4 |
|
Vehicle floorplan payable non-trade |
|
|
299.6 |
|
|
|
453.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,200.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,805.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle floorplan payable-trade reflects amounts borrowed to finance the purchase of specific
new vehicle inventories with the corresponding manufacturers captive finance subsidiaries (trade
lenders). Vehicle floorplan payable-non-trade represents amounts borrowed to finance the purchase
of specific new and, to a lesser extent, used vehicle inventories with non-trade lenders. Changes
in vehicle floorplan payable-trade are reported as operating cash flows and changes in vehicle
floorplan payable-non-trade are reported as financing cash flows in the accompanying Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
On
April 30, 2009, GMAC Financial Services (GMAC) entered into an agreement with Chrysler LLC to
provide automotive financing products and services to Chrysler dealers and their customers. As a
result of this agreement, we have treated new Chrysler vehicles
financed by GMAC after April 30, 2009, as
vehicle floorplan payable-non-trade. Vehicles financed by Chrysler Financial prior to this
agreement continue to be classified as vehicle floorplan payable-trade.
8
AUTONATION, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Floorplan facilities are due on demand, but in the case of new vehicle inventories, are
generally paid within several business days after the related vehicles are sold. Our manufacturer
agreements generally require that the manufacturer have the ability to draft against the new
floorplan facilities so the lender directly funds the manufacturer for the purchase of new vehicle
inventory. Floorplan facilities are primarily collateralized by vehicle inventories and related
receivables.
Our vehicle floorplan facilities, which utilize LIBOR-based interest rates, averaged 2.5% for
the six months ended June 30, 2009, and 4.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2008. At June 30,
2009, aggregate capacity under our floorplan credit agreements with various lenders to finance a
portion of our used vehicle inventory was $170.0 million, of which $61.5 million was outstanding at
June 30, 2009. At June 30, 2009, aggregate capacity under all of our floorplan credit facilities
to finance vehicles was approximately $2.8 billion, of which $1.2 billion total was outstanding.
4. |
|
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS |
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets, net, consist of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
1,121.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,122.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise rights indefinite-lived |
|
$ |
172.4 |
|
|
$ |
173.9 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180.0 |
|
|
|
181.5 |
|
Less: accumulated amortization |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangibles assets, net |
|
$ |
175.9 |
|
|
$ |
177.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually on April 30 or more frequently when events or
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a reporting unit more likely than not exceeds its
fair value. We completed our annual impairment tests as of April 30, 2009, and no goodwill
impairment charges resulted from the required goodwill impairment test. During 2008, we recorded
impairment charges of $1.61 billion ($1.37 billion after-tax) associated with goodwill. For a
complete discussion of these impairment charges, please see Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
The test for goodwill impairment, as defined by SFAS No. 142, is a two-step approach. The
first step of the goodwill impairment test requires a determination of whether or not the fair
value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If so, the second step is required,
which involves an analysis reflecting the allocation of the fair value determined in the first step
(as if it was the purchase price in a business combination). This process may result in the
determination of a new amount of goodwill. If the calculated fair value of the goodwill resulting
from this allocation is lower than the carrying value of the goodwill in the reporting unit, the
difference is reflected as a non-cash impairment loss.
We estimate the fair value of our reporting units using an income valuation approach, which
discounts projected free cash flows (DCF) of the reporting unit at a computed weighted average cost
of capital as the discount rate. The future cash flows and weighted average cost of capital are
estimated by management consistent with a market participant perspective. In connection with this
process, we also reconcile the estimated aggregate fair values of our reporting units to our market
capitalization, including consideration of a control premium that represents the estimated amount
an investor would pay for our equity securities to obtain a controlling interest. We believe that
this reconciliation process is also consistent with a market participant perspective.
9
AUTONATION, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Goodwill allocated to our reporting units and changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for
the six months ended June 30, 2009, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
|
Import |
|
|
Luxury |
|
|
and other |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Goodwill at January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
152.0 |
|
|
$ |
500.4 |
|
|
$ |
469.6 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,122.0 |
|
Acquisitions and other
adjustments |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
152.2 |
|
|
$ |
500.0 |
|
|
$ |
469.3 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,121.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Intangible Assets
Our principal identifiable intangible assets are individual store rights under franchise
agreements with vehicle manufacturers, which have indefinite lives and are tested at least annually
on April 30 for impairment. The impairment test for intangibles with indefinite lives requires the
comparison of estimated fair value to its carrying value by store. Fair values of rights under
franchise agreements are estimated by discounting expected future cash flows of the store. We
completed our annual impairment tests as of April 30, 2009, and we recorded $1.5 million ($0.9
million after-tax) of non-cash impairment charges related to rights under an Import stores
franchise agreement. This non-cash impairment charge was recorded to reduce the carrying value of
the stores franchise agreement to its estimated fair value.
During 2008, we recorded impairment charges of $146.5 million ($90.8 million after-tax)
associated with franchise rights. We reclassified impairment charges of $5.1 million ($3.0 million
after-tax) that were recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2008, to Loss from
Discontinued Operations in our consolidated income statements as the stores associated with these
impairment charges were reclassified to discontinued operations during 2009. For a discussion of
these impairment charges, please see Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
5. |
|
NOTES PAYABLE AND LONG-TERM DEBT |
|
|
|
Notes payable and long-term debt consist of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Floating rate senior unsecured notes, due 2013 |
|
$ |
156.5 |
|
|
$ |
194.5 |
|
7% senior unsecured notes, due 2014 |
|
|
132.6 |
|
|
|
172.6 |
|
Term loan facility, due 2012 |
|
|
600.0 |
|
|
|
600.0 |
|
Revolving credit facility, due 2012 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Mortgage facility, due 2017 |
|
|
229.9 |
|
|
|
233.3 |
|
Other debt, due from 2010 to 2025 |
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
58.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,133.0 |
|
|
|
1,258.9 |
|
Less: current maturities |
|
|
(13.8 |
) |
|
|
(33.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities |
|
$ |
1,119.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,225.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Unsecured Notes and Credit Agreement
At June 30, 2009, we had outstanding $156.5 million of floating rate senior unsecured notes
due April 15, 2013, and $132.6 million of 7% senior unsecured notes due April 15, 2014, in each
case at par. The floating rate senior unsecured notes bear interest at a rate equal to three-month
LIBOR plus 2.0% per annum, adjusted quarterly, and may be redeemed by us currently at 102% of
principal, on or after April 15, 2010, at 101% of principal, and on or after April 15, 2011, at
100% of principal. The 7% senior unsecured notes may be redeemed by us currently at 105.25% of
principal, on or after April 15, 2010, at 103.5% of principal, on or after April 15, 2011, at
101.75% of principal, and on or after April 15, 2012, at 100% of principal.
10
AUTONATION, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we repurchased $6.0 million aggregate principal
amount of our floating rate senior unsecured notes due April 15, 2013, for an aggregate total
consideration of $5.4 million.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we repurchased $38.0 million aggregate principal
amount of our floating rate senior unsecured notes due April 15, 2013, for an aggregate total
consideration of $31.4 million. We also repurchased $40.0 million aggregate principal amount of
our 7% senior unsecured notes due April 15, 2014, for an aggregate total consideration of $34.5
million.
We recorded a gain of $0.6 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009, and $12.5
million during the six months ended June 30, 2009 in connection with these repurchases, net of the
write-off of related unamortized debt issuance costs. The gain is classified as Gain on Senior
Note Repurchases in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Income Statements.
Under our amended credit agreement which terminates on July 18, 2012, we have a $700.0 million
revolving credit facility that provides for various interest rates on borrowings generally at LIBOR
plus 0.725% and a $600.0 million term loan facility bearing interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus
0.875%. We also have a letter of credit sublimit as part of our revolving credit facility. The
amount available to be borrowed under the revolving credit facility is reduced on a
dollar-for-dollar basis by the cumulative amount of any outstanding letters of credit, which
totaled $71.5 million at June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, we had no borrowings outstanding
under the revolving credit facility, leaving $628.5 million of borrowing capacity. As of June 30,
2009, this borrowing capacity was limited under the maximum consolidated leverage ratio contained
in our amended credit agreement to approximately $271 million.
The credit spread charged for the revolving credit facility and term loan facility is impacted
by our senior unsecured credit ratings from Standard & Poors (BB+, with negative outlook) and
Moodys (Ba2, with negative outlook). For instance, under the current terms of our amended credit
agreement, a one-notch downgrade of our senior unsecured credit rating by either Standard & Poors
or Moodys would result in a 25 basis point increase in the credit spread under our term loan
facility, a 20 basis point increase in the credit spread under our revolving credit facility, and a
5 basis point increase in the facility fee applicable to our revolving credit facility.
Our senior unsecured notes and borrowings under the amended credit agreement are guaranteed by
substantially all of our subsidiaries. Within the meaning of Regulation S-X, Rule 3-10, AutoNation,
Inc. (the parent company) has no independent assets or operations, the guarantees of its
subsidiaries are full and unconditional and joint and several, and any subsidiaries other than the
guarantor subsidiaries are minor.
Other Debt
At June 30, 2009, we had $229.9 million outstanding under a mortgage facility with an
automotive manufacturers captive finance subsidiary due December 1, 2017. The mortgage facility
utilizes a fixed interest rate of 5.864% and is secured by 10-year mortgages on certain of our
store properties.
In 2000, we sold our corporate headquarters facility and leased it back in a transaction that
was originally accounted for as a financing. During the first quarter of 2009, we amended this
lease, resulting in a change in accounting method from financing to sale-leaseback. As a result of
this change, we derecognized $21.4 million of assets and a $37.9 million financing liability during
the first quarter of 2009, when we also recognized a $7.6 million gain on the sale, which is
recorded in Other Expenses (Income), Net. The remaining gain of $8.9 million and remaining rent
expense of $9.1 million are being recognized on a straight-line basis through the third quarter of
2009. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized $5.3 million of gain and $5.5
million of rent expense related to this transaction.
11
AUTONATION, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Restrictions and Covenants
Our amended credit agreement, the indenture for our floating rate and 7% senior unsecured
notes, our vehicle floorplan payable facilities, and our mortgage facility contain numerous
customary financial and operating covenants that place significant restrictions on us, including
our ability to incur additional indebtedness or prepay existing indebtedness, to declare cash
dividends, to create liens or other encumbrances, to sell (or otherwise dispose of) assets, and to
merge or consolidate with other entities.
For example, under the amended credit agreement, we are required to maintain a maximum
consolidated leverage ratio, as defined (3.0 times at each quarter-end through September 30, 2009,
after which it will revert to 2.75 times on December 31, 2009). In March 2008, we amended our
credit agreement to provide that non-cash impairment losses associated with goodwill and intangible
assets as well as certain other non-cash charges would be excluded from the computation of the
maximum consolidated leverage ratio. We are also required to maintain a maximum capitalization
ratio (65%), as defined.
In addition, the indenture for the floating rate and 7% senior unsecured notes contains a debt
incurrence restriction based on a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio (2:1), and the mortgage
facility contains covenants regarding maximum cash flow leverage and minimum interest coverage.
Our failure to comply with the covenants contained in our debt agreements could permit
acceleration of all of our indebtedness. Our debt agreements have cross-default provisions that
trigger a default in the event of an uncured default under other material indebtedness of
AutoNation.
In the event of a downgrade in our senior unsecured credit ratings, none of the covenants
described above would be impacted. In addition, availability under the amended credit agreement
described above would not be impacted should a downgrade in the senior unsecured debt credit
ratings occur. Certain covenants in the indenture for the floating rate and 7% senior unsecured
notes would be eliminated with an upgrade of our senior unsecured credit ratings to investment
grade by either Standard & Poors or Moodys.
6. INCOME TAXES
Income taxes refundable included in Accounts Receivable totaled $10.1 million at June 30,
2009, and $12.5 million at December 31, 2008.
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states. As a matter
of course, various taxing authorities, including the IRS, regularly audit us. Currently, the IRS
is auditing the tax years from 2005 to 2006. These audits may result in proposed assessments where
the ultimate resolution may result in our owing additional taxes. We believe that our tax
positions comply with applicable tax law and that we have adequately provided for these matters.
It is our continuing policy to account for interest and penalties associated with income tax
obligations as a component of provision for income taxes in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
7. SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we did not repurchase any shares of our common
stock other than 6,174 shares that were surrendered to AutoNation to satisfy tax withholding
obligations in connection with restricted stock issued to retirement-eligible employees. As of
June 30, 2009, $142.7 million remained available for share repurchases under the existing
repurchase program approved by our Board of Directors. Future share repurchases are subject to
limitations contained in the indenture relating to our floating rate and 7% senior unsecured notes.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we repurchased 3.8 million shares of our common
stock for an aggregate purchase price of $54.1 million (average purchase price per share of
$14.37).
12
AUTONATION, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
We issued 1.0 million shares of common stock in connection with the exercise of stock options
during the six months ended June 30, 2009, and 0.1 million shares during the six months ended June
30, 2008. The proceeds from the exercise of stock options were $9.8 million (average exercise
price per share of $10.14) during the six months ended June 30, 2009, and $1.0 million (average
exercise price per share of $10.85) during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
We granted 0.2 million shares of restricted stock during the six months ended June 30, 2009,
in connection with our annual restricted stock award grant. See Note 9 of the Notes to Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
8. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss)
per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding adjusted for the dilutive effect of stock options. Anti-dilutive options
totaling 8.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, and 8.7 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009, have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share.
Anti-dilutive options totaling 9.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, and 9.0
million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, have been excluded from the computation of diluted
earnings per share.
The computation of weighted-average common and common equivalent shares used in the
calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding used in calculating basic
earnings per share |
|
|
177.8 |
|
|
|
178.0 |
|
|
|
177.3 |
|
|
|
179.0 |
|
Effect of dilutive stock-based awards |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares used in
calculating diluted earnings per share |
|
|
178.8 |
|
|
|
178.7 |
|
|
|
178.0 |
|
|
|
179.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. STOCKBASED COMPENSATION
The AutoNation, Inc. 2008 Equity and Incentive Plan (2008 Plan) provides for the grant of
stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and other
stock-based and cash-based awards. A maximum of 12.0 million shares may be issued under the 2008
Plan, provided that no more than 2.0 million shares may be issued pursuant to the grant of awards,
other than options or stock appreciation rights, that are settled in shares. The exercise price of
all stock options and stock appreciation
rights granted under the 2008 Plan, is equal to or above the closing price of our common stock
on the date such awards are granted, or if the date of grant is not a trading day, on the next
trading day.
In February 2009, the Executive Compensation Subcommittee (the Subcommittee) of the
Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors approved annual stock option awards to our named
executive officers and other employees under the 2008 Plan. Prior to 2009, the Subcommittees
practice had been to award stock options during the third quarter with an effective grant date
after the public release of the Companys second-quarter earnings results. For 2009, the
Subcommittee modified its practice by approving the annual stock option awards to our named
executive officers and other employees in the first quarter and granting the awards in four equal
increments over the year, subject to continuous employment through each grant date. The
Subcommittee approved a total of 1.2 million employee stock options for 2009. One-fourth of each
stock option award that was approved in February 2009 was granted on March 2, 2009, and on June 1,
2009, and an additional one-fourth of each such stock option award will be granted on the first New
York Stock Exchange trading day of each of September and December 2009. The options granted on
March 2, 2009, and June 1, 2009, have an exercise price equal to the closing price per share on the
grant date ($9.92 on March 2, 2009 and $16.99 on June 1, 2009), and each subsequent option grant
will have an exercise price equal to the closing price of our common stock on the applicable grant
date in accordance with the 2008 Plan. In February 2009, the Subcommittee also approved a total of
0.2 million shares of restricted stock, all of which were granted to restricted stock-eligible
employees on March 2, 2009.
13
AUTONATION, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The AutoNation, Inc. 2007 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (Non-Employee Director
Plan) provides for the grant of stock options to our non-employee directors. The exercise price
of all stock options granted under the Non-Employee Director Plan is equal to or above the closing
price of our common stock on the trading day immediately prior to the date of grant. In accordance
with the terms of the Non-Employee Director Plan, on January 2, 2009, each of our non-employee
directors was automatically granted an option to purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock (for a
total of 120,000 options) at an exercise price equal to $9.88 per share, the closing price per
share of Company common stock on December 31, 2008.
No additional options may be issued under our other stock option plans (Prior Plans). Under
our Prior Plans, stock options were granted with exercise prices equal to or above the closing
price of our common stock on the trading day immediately prior to the date of grant.
Stock Options
Stock options granted under all plans are non-qualified. Upon exercise, shares of common
stock are issued from our treasury stock. Generally, employee stock options granted in 2008 and
prior years have a term of 10 years from the date of grant and vest in increments of 25% per year
over a four-year period on the anniversary of the grant date. Stock options granted in 2009 have a
term of 10 years from the first date of grant in 2009 (i.e., all options granted or to be granted
in 2009 will expire on March 2, 2019) and vest in equal installments over four years commencing on
June 1, 2010. Stock options granted to non-employee directors have a term of 10 years from the
date of grant and vest immediately upon grant.
We use the Black-Scholes valuation model to determine compensation expense and amortize
compensation expense over the requisite service period of the grants on a straight-line basis.
Certain of our equity-based compensation plans contain provisions that provide for vesting of
awards upon retirement. Accordingly, the related compensation cost for awards granted subsequent to
our adoption on January 1, 2006, of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Shared-Based Payment (SFAS No.
123R), must be recognized over the shorter of the stated vesting period or the period until
employees become retirement-eligible.
The following table summarizes the assumptions used relating to the valuation of our stock
options during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
1.64% 4.87%
|
|
3.12% 4.87% |
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
Expected term
|
|
4 7 years
|
|
4 7 years |
Expected volatility
|
|
20% 52%
|
|
20% 40% |
The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve at the time of the
grant. The expected term of stock options granted is derived from historical data and represents
the period of time that stock options are expected to be outstanding. The expected volatility is
based on historical volatility, implied volatility, and other factors impacting us.
14
AUTONATION, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
A summary of stock option activity is as follows for the six months ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Term (Years) |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Options outstanding at January 1 |
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
$ |
16.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted * |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
12.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
$ |
10.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
17.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
$ |
14.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at June 30 |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
$ |
16.34 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
29.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at June 30 |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
$ |
16.25 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
19.3 |
|
Options available for future grants at June 30 |
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2009,
are primarily related to our employee quarterly stock option award grants in March and June 2009 and our non-employee director annual
stock option award grant in January 2009. |
The total intrinsic value (which equals the spread between the market value of the stock
and the exercise price) of stock options exercised was $6.5 million during the six months ended
June 30, 2009, and $0.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Restricted Stock
Restricted stock awards are considered nonvested share awards as defined under SFAS No. 123R
and are issued from our treasury stock. Restricted stock awards granted in 2008 vest in increments
of 25% per year over a four-year period on the anniversary of the grant date. Restricted stock
awards granted in 2009 vest in equal installments over
four years commencing on June 1, 2010. Compensation cost for restricted stock awards is
recognized over the shorter of the stated vesting period or the period until employees become
retirement-eligible based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant.
The following table summarizes information about vested and unvested restricted stock for the
six months ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant Date Fair |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
Value |
|
Nonvested at January 1 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
10.17 |
|
Granted ** |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
9.97 |
|
Vested |
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 30 |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
10.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** |
|
The restricted stock awards granted during the six months ended June 30, 2009,
are primarily related to our employee annual restricted stock award grant in March 2009. |
15
AUTONATION, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Compensation Expense
The following table summarizes the total stock-based compensation expense recognized in
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses in the 2009 and 2008 Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Income Statement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Stock options (1) |
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
8.5 |
|
|
$ |
8.0 |
|
|
$ |
12.3 |
|
Restricted stock |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
|
$ |
8.5 |
|
|
$ |
8.5 |
|
|
$ |
12.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
includes $5.3 million of additional stock-based compensation expense that was recorded in the
second quarter of 2008 to reflect the correction of our expense attribution method
to accelerate stock-based compensation expense for employees who are or will
become retirement-eligible prior to the stated vesting period of the award. |
As of June 30, 2009, there was $14.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements, of which $11.5 million relates to stock
options and $2.8 million relates to restricted stock. These amounts are expected to be recognized
over a weighted average period of 1.7 years.
10. |
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
|
|
Comprehensive income is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
36.7 |
|
|
$ |
51.8 |
|
|
$ |
71.3 |
|
|
$ |
102.5 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
37.0 |
|
|
$ |
51.7 |
|
|
$ |
71.6 |
|
|
$ |
102.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. ACQUISITIONS
We acquired one automotive retail franchise and related assets during each of the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. Acquisitions are included in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements from the date of acquisition.
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Proceedings
We are involved, and will continue to be involved, in numerous legal proceedings arising out
of the conduct of our business, including litigation with customers, employment related lawsuits,
class actions, purported class actions, and actions brought by governmental authorities.
We are a party to numerous legal proceedings that arose in the conduct of our business. We do
not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows. However, the results of these
matters cannot be predicted with certainty, and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of these
matters could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and
cash flows.
16
AUTONATION, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Other Matters
AutoNation, acting through its subsidiaries, is the lessee under many real estate leases that
provide for the use by our subsidiaries of their respective dealership premises. Pursuant to these
leases, our subsidiaries generally agree to indemnify the lessor and other related parties from
certain liabilities arising as a result of the use of the leased premises, including environmental
liabilities, or a breach of the lease by the lessee. Additionally, from time to time, we enter
into agreements with third parties in connection with the sale of assets or businesses in which we
agree to indemnify the purchaser or related parties from certain liabilities or costs arising in
connection with the assets or business. Also, in the ordinary course of business in connection
with purchases or sales of goods and services, we enter into agreements that may contain
indemnification provisions. In the event that an indemnification claim is asserted, liability
would be limited by the terms of the applicable agreement.
From time to time, primarily in connection with dispositions of automotive stores, our
subsidiaries assign or sublet to the dealership purchaser the subsidiaries interests in any real
property leases associated with such stores. In general, our subsidiaries retain responsibility
for the performance of certain obligations under such leases to the extent that the assignee or
sublessee does not perform, whether such performance is required prior to or following the
assignment or subletting of the lease. Additionally, AutoNation and its subsidiaries generally
remain subject to the terms of any guarantees made by us and our subsidiaries in connection with
such leases. Although we generally have indemnification rights against the assignee or sublessee
in the event of non-performance under these leases, as well as certain defenses, we estimate that
lessee rental payment obligations during the remaining terms of these leases are approximately $82
million at June 30, 2009. We do not have any material known commitments that we or our
subsidiaries will be called on to perform under any such assigned leases or subleases at June 30,
2009. Our exposure under these leases is difficult to estimate and there can be no assurance that
any performance of AutoNation or its subsidiaries required under these leases would not have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and cash flows.
At June 30, 2009, surety bonds, letters of credit, and cash deposits totaled $109.4 million,
including $71.5 million of letters of credit. In the ordinary course of business, we are required
to post performance and surety bonds, letters of credit, and/or cash deposits as financial
guarantees of our performance. We do not currently provide cash collateral for outstanding letters
of credit.
In the ordinary course of business, we are subject to numerous laws and regulations, including
automotive, environmental, health and safety, and other laws and regulations. We do not anticipate
that the costs of such compliance will have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated
results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition,
although such outcome is possible given the nature of our operations and the extensive legal
and regulatory framework applicable to our business. We do not have any material known
environmental commitments or contingencies.
13. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Discontinued operations are related to stores that were sold or terminated, that we have
entered into an agreement to sell or terminate, or for which we otherwise deem a proposed sales
transaction or termination to be probable, with no material changes expected. Generally, the sale
of a store is completed within 60 to 90 days after the date of a sale agreement.
We received proceeds (net of cash relinquished) of $40.5 million during the six months ended
June 30, 2009, and $12.3 million during the same period in 2008 related to discontinued operations.
17
AUTONATION, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Changes in the number of stores not yet sold or closed in discontinued operations for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Stores |
|
|
|
Not Yet Sold or |
|
|
|
Closed in |
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
Operations |
|
Stores not yet sold or closed in discontinued operations at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
Classified as discontinued operations during first quarter of 2009 |
|
|
17 |
|
Sold or closed during first quarter of 2009 |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
Stores not yet sold or closed in discontinued operations at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
Classified as discontinued operations during second quarter of 2009 (1) |
|
|
11 |
|
Sold or closed during second quarter of 2009 (2) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
Stores not yet sold or closed in discontinued operations at June, 2009 (3) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the second quarter of 2009, five of the stores classified as discontinued operations
were Chrysler stores that were closed in connection with the Chrysler bankruptcy, and three
of the stores were General Motors stores that we agreed to close in the future in connection
with the General Motors bankruptcy. Chrysler terminated the franchise rights associated with
a total of seven stores, however, two of those stores did not meet the criteria to be
classified as discontinued operations due to the expected migration of certain revenues
associated with those stores to other continuing operations stores. We agreed to close a
total of four General Motors dealerships, however, one of the General Motors dealerships had
franchise rights that were terminated by Chrysler and is included in the five Chrysler stores
referenced above. |
|
(2) |
|
Six of the stores that were sold or closed during the second quarter of 2009 were classified as
discontinued operations in the second quarter of 2009, including the five Chrysler stores
discussed above, and 12 of the stores were classified as discontinued operations in the first
quarter of 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Of the seven remaining stores in discontinued operations at June 30, 2009, two were
classified as discontinued operations in the first quarter of 2009 and five were classified
as discontinued operations in the second quarter of 2009, including the General Motors stores
that we agreed to close in connection with the General Motors bankruptcy. |
The accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for all the periods
presented have been adjusted to classify these stores as discontinued operations. Assets and
liabilities of discontinued operations are reported in the Corporate and other category of our
segment information in Note 14 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements below. Selected income statement data for our discontinued operations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
105.5 |
|
|
$ |
273.4 |
|
|
$ |
244.9 |
|
|
$ |
582.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
Pre-tax gain (loss) on disposal of discontinued operations |
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
(42.2 |
) |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.7 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
(48.8 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(12.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
$ |
(18.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(36.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
AUTONATION, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
A summary of the total assets and liabilities of discontinued operations included in Other
Current Assets and Other Current Liabilities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Inventory |
|
$ |
25.8 |
|
|
$ |
127.6 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
106.4 |
|
|
|
170.5 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
32.4 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
156.9 |
|
|
$ |
360.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle floorplan payable-trade |
|
$ |
12.9 |
|
|
$ |
89.2 |
|
Vehicle floorplan payable-non-trade |
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
34.1 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
36.9 |
|
|
$ |
145.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Responsibility for our vehicle floorplan payable at the time of divestiture is assumed by the
buyer. Cash received from business divestitures is net of vehicle floorplan payable assumed by the
buyer.
14. SEGMENT INFORMATION
At June 30, 2009, we had three operating and reportable segments: (1) Domestic, (2) Import,
and (3) Premium Luxury. Our Domestic segment is comprised of retail automotive franchises that
sell new vehicles manufactured by Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler. Our Import segment is
comprised of retail automotive franchises that sell new vehicles manufactured primarily by Toyota,
Honda, and Nissan. Our Premium Luxury segment is comprised of retail automotive franchises that
sell new vehicles manufactured primarily by Mercedes, BMW, and Lexus. The franchises in each
segment also sell used vehicles, parts and automotive services, and automotive finance and
insurance products. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to reflect our operating segment
structure at June 30, 2009.
Corporate and other is comprised of our other businesses, including collision centers,
E-commerce activities, and auction operations, each of which generates revenues, as well as
unallocated corporate overhead expenses.
The operating segments identified above are the business activities of the Company for which
discrete financial information is available and for which operating results are regularly reviewed
by our chief operating decision maker to allocate resources and assess performance. Our chief
operating decision maker is our Chief Executive Officer. We have determined that our three
operating segments also represent our reportable segments.
19
AUTONATION, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Reportable segment revenues and segment income (loss) are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
842.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,147.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,622.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,422.2 |
|
Import |
|
|
1,004.4 |
|
|
|
1,500.1 |
|
|
|
1,897.0 |
|
|
|
2,961.8 |
|
Premium Luxury |
|
|
733.9 |
|
|
|
988.3 |
|
|
|
1,437.8 |
|
|
|
1,950.7 |
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
58.2 |
|
|
|
60.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
2,609.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,663.6 |
|
|
$ |
5,015.5 |
|
|
$ |
7,395.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Segment income (loss)*: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
25.8 |
|
|
$ |
32.9 |
|
|
$ |
48.0 |
|
|
$ |
70.1 |
|
Import |
|
|
41.6 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
|
|
|
70.9 |
|
|
|
112.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium Luxury |
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
51.5 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
|
102.2 |
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
(27.1 |
) |
|
|
(23.8 |
) |
|
|
(49.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment income |
|
|
93.0 |
|
|
|
114.4 |
|
|
|
178.9 |
|
|
|
235.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other interest expense |
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
|
|
(21.6 |
) |
|
|
(22.3 |
) |
|
|
(48.4 |
) |
Gain on senior note repurchases |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Other gains (losses), net |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
$ |
86.9 |
|
|
$ |
94.1 |
|
|
$ |
171.5 |
|
|
$ |
186.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Segment income (loss) is defined as operating income net of floorplan interest expense. |
15. BUSINESS AND CREDIT CONCENTRATIONS
We are subject to a concentration of risk in the event of financial distress of a major
vehicle manufacturer. The core brands of vehicles that we sell are manufactured by Toyota, Ford,
Honda, Nissan, General Motors, Mercedes, BMW, and Chrysler. These manufacturers have been
adversely impacted by the unfavorable economic conditions in the United States and elsewhere.
On April 30, 2009, Chrysler and several of its affiliates filed voluntary petitions for relief
under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the Bankruptcy Code). In connection with
the bankruptcy, Chrysler filed, and the bankruptcy court approved, a dealer consolidation plan to
close approximately 789 dealerships, including seven of our Chrysler dealerships. The bankruptcy
court also approved the sale of certain Chrysler assets to a new entity that will operate the
reorganized Chrysler business. The new Chrysler entity is owned primarily by the autoworkers
union retirement health care trust, Fiat, and the U.S. and Canadian governments. On June 10, 2009,
Chrysler completed the sale, and the new Chrysler entity assumed our remaining Chrysler franchise
agreements under which we will continue to operate our remaining Chrysler dealerships that were not
terminated in the bankruptcy.
On June 1, 2009, General Motors and several of its affiliates also filed voluntary petitions
for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. In connection with the bankruptcy, we entered
into wind-down agreements with General Motors pursuant to which we agreed to close four of our
dealerships by October 2010 in exchange for certain wind-down payments. At the same time, we
entered into participation agreements under which our remaining General Motors dealerships will
continue to operate as franchisees of the new General Motors formed as a result of the bankruptcy.
Certain of our dealerships with multiple General Motors franchises entered into a participation
agreement as to certain franchises and a wind-down agreement as to other franchises (such as
Pontiac, which General Motors is discontinuing as part of the bankruptcy). On July 5, 2009, the
bankruptcy court approved General Motors plan to sell certain assets to a new entity that will
operate the reorganized General Motors business, and, on July
10, 2009, General Motors completed the sale. The new General Motors entity is owned primarily
by the U.S. and Canadian governments, the autoworkers union retirement health care trust and
certain former bondholders and other creditors of General Motors.
20
AUTONATION, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Our business could be materially adversely impacted by another bankruptcy of a major vehicle
manufacturer or related lender. For example, (i) a manufacturer in bankruptcy could attempt to
terminate all or certain of our franchises, in which case we may not receive adequate compensation
for our franchises, (ii) such lender could attempt to terminate our floorplan financing and demand
repayment of any amounts outstanding, (iii) consumer demand for such manufacturers products could
be materially adversely affected, (iv) we may be unable to arrange financing for our customers for
their vehicle purchases and leases through such lender, in which case we would be required to seek
financing with alternate financing sources, which may be difficult to obtain on similar terms, if
at all, (v) we may be unable to collect some or all of our significant receivables that are due
from such manufacturer or lender, and we may be subject to preference claims relating to payments
made by such manufacturer or lender prior to bankruptcy, and (vi) such manufacturer may be relieved
of its indemnification obligations with respect to product liability claims. Additionally, any such
bankruptcy may result in us being required to incur impairment charges with respect to the
inventory, fixed assets, and intangible assets related to certain franchises, which could adversely
impact our results of operations, financial condition, and our ability to remain in compliance with
the financial ratios contained in our debt agreements. Tens of billions of dollars of U.S.
government support were provided to Chrysler, General Motors, and GMAC, and we believe that this
support mitigated the potential adverse impacts to us resulting from the Chrysler and General
Motors bankruptcies. There can be no assurance that U.S. government support will be provided to the
same extent or at all in the event of another bankruptcy of a major vehicle manufacturer or related
lender. As a result, the potential adverse impact on our financial condition and results of
operations could be relatively worse in a manufacturer or related lender bankruptcy which is not
financially supported by the U.S. government.
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to non-manufacturer trade receivables are limited
due to the wide variety of customers and markets in which our products are sold as well as their
dispersion across many different geographic areas in the United States. Consequently, at June 30,
2009, we do not consider AutoNation to have any significant non-manufacturer concentrations of
credit risk.
16. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The fair value of a financial instrument represents the amount at which the instrument could
be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced sale or
liquidation. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market
information about the financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve
uncertainties and matters of significant judgment, and therefore cannot be determined with
precision. The assumptions used have a significant effect on the estimated amounts reported.
The following methods and assumptions were used by us in estimating fair value disclosures for
financial instruments:
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, trade and manufacturer receivables, other current assets,
vehicle floorplan payable, accounts payable, other current liabilities, and variable rate
debt: The amounts reported in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets approximate fair value due to their short-term nature. |
|
|
|
|
Marketable Securities: Investments in marketable securities are stated at fair value,
estimated based on quoted market prices, with unrealized gains and losses included in
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets. The carrying amount and fair value of our investments in marketable securities
totaled $4.5 million at June 30, 2009, and $6.8 million at December 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate debt: The fair value of fixed rate debt is based on an estimated amount that
would be paid to transfer the debt to a credit-equivalent market participant at the
measurement date. The carrying amounts of our fixed rate debt primarily consisting of amounts
outstanding under our senior unsecured notes and mortgages totaled $376.5 million at June 30,
2009, and $465.1 million at December 31, 2008, with a fair value of $352.0 million at June
30, 2009, and $377.8 million at December 31, 2008. |
21
AUTONATION, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS No.
157 establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value and also establishes
the following three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities |
|
Level 2
|
|
Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted market prices in markets that are
not active; or model-derived valuations or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities |
|
Level 3
|
|
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities |
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 for our nonfinancial
assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Nonfinancial assets such as
goodwill, other intangible assets, and long-lived assets held and used are measured at fair value
when there is an indicator of impairment and recorded at fair value only when impairment is
recognized or for a business combination. The fair value less cost to sell of long-lived assets
held for sale are assessed each reporting period they remain classified as held for sale.
Subsequent changes in the held for sale long-lived assets fair value less cost to sell (increase
or decrease) is reported as an adjustment to its carrying amount, except that the adjusted carrying
amount cannot exceed the carrying amount of the long-lived asset at the time it was initially
classified as held for sale.
The following table presents nonfinancial assets measured and recorded at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis during the six months ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
Franchise rights |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets held for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11.8 |
|
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102.9 |
|
|
|
(22.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-lived assets
held for sale |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
114.7 |
|
|
$ |
(23.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, no impairment charge was recorded in accordance
with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, for the carrying value of goodwill.
Rights under an Import stores franchise agreement with a carrying amount of $4.4 million were
written down to an estimated fair value of $2.9 million, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge
of $1.5 million, which was included in Franchise Rights Impairment during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009. This non-cash impairment charge was recorded to reduce the carrying value of
the stores franchise agreement to its estimated fair value. See Note 4 of the Notes to Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information on how fair value measurements are
derived for our goodwill and franchise rights.
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal
of Long-Lived Assets, during the six months ended June 30, 2009, long-lived assets held for sale in
continuing operations with a carrying amount of $13.0 million were written down to their fair value
of $11.8 million, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of $1.2 million, which was included in
Other Expenses (Income), Net in our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and
included as a component of Segment Income (Loss) in the Corporate and other category of our
segment information. The $1.2 million of impairment recorded includes $0.7 million that was
recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2009.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, long-lived assets held for sale in discontinued
operations with a carrying amount of $125.0 million were written down to their fair value of $102.9
million, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of $22.1 million, which related to certain of
our discontinued operations stores and was included in Loss from
Discontinued Operations. The
$22.1 million of impairment includes $10.8 million that was recorded during the three months ended
June 30, 2009.
The fair value measurements for our long-lived assets held for sale were based on Level 3
inputs obtained from third-party real estate valuation sources.
22
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included under Item 1. In addition, reference
should be made to our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and related
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in
our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Certain amounts have been reclassified from the previously reported financial statements to
conform to the financial statement presentation of the current period.
Overview
AutoNation, Inc., through its subsidiaries, is the largest automotive retailer in the United
States. As of June 30, 2009, we owned and operated 264 new vehicle franchises from 210 stores
located in major metropolitan markets, predominantly in the Sunbelt region of the United States.
Our stores, which we believe include some of the most recognizable and well known in our key
markets, sell 35 different brands of new vehicles. The core brands of vehicles that we sell,
representing approximately 98% of the new vehicles that we sold during the six months ended June
30, 2009, are manufactured by Toyota, Ford, Honda, Nissan, General Motors, Mercedes, BMW, and
Chrysler.
We offer a diversified range of automotive products and services, including new vehicles, used
vehicles, parts and automotive repair and maintenance services, and automotive finance and
insurance products. We also arrange financing for vehicle purchases through third-party finance
sources. We believe that the significant scale of our operations and the quality of our managerial
talent allow us to achieve efficiencies in our key markets by, among other things, leveraging our
market brands and advertising, improving asset management, implementing standardized processes, and
increasing productivity across all of our stores.
At June 30, 2009, we had three operating and reportable segments: (1) Domestic, (2) Import,
and (3) Premium Luxury. Our Domestic segment is comprised of retail automotive franchises that
sell new vehicles manufactured by Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler. Our Import segment is
comprised of retail automotive franchises that sell new vehicles manufactured primarily by Toyota,
Honda, and Nissan. Our Premium Luxury segment is comprised of retail automotive franchises that
sell new vehicles manufactured primarily by Mercedes, BMW, and Lexus. The franchises in each
segment also sell used vehicles, parts and automotive services, and automotive finance and
insurance products. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to reflect our operating segment
structure at June 30, 2009.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, new vehicle sales accounted for approximately 50% of
our total revenue, but approximately 17% of our total gross profit. Our parts and service and
finance and insurance operations, while comprising approximately 25% of total revenue for the six
months ended June 30, 2009, contributed approximately 68% of our gross profit for the same period.
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we had net income from continuing operations of
$54.8 million and diluted earnings per share of $0.31, as compared to net income from continuing
operations of $55.5 million and diluted earnings per share of $0.31, during the same period in
2008. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we had net income from continuing operations of
$107.8 million and diluted earnings per share of $0.61, as compared to net income from continuing
operations of $110.6 million and diluted earnings per share of $0.62, during the same period in
2008.
Results for the three months ended June 30, 2009, were favorably impacted by a net gain on
asset sales and dispositions of $5.9 million ($3.7 million after-tax). Results for the six months
ended June 30, 2009, were favorably impacted by a gain on senior note repurchases of $12.5 million
($7.7 million after-tax) and a net gain on asset sales and dispositions of $15.5 million ($9.6
million after-tax), partially offset by property impairments of $1.2 million ($0.7 million
after-tax).
Results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, were adversely impacted by a
non-cash stock-based compensation expense adjustment of $5.3 million ($3.1 million after-tax).
23
Market Challenges
Our results of operations for the second quarter of 2009 reflected a challenging automotive
retail market impacted by the unfavorable economic conditions in the United States. Although we
expect that market conditions will remain challenging, we continue to believe that the rate of new
vehicle sales will improve in the second half of 2009, as compared to the first half of 2009. In
this environment, we believe that we will be able to manage within the financial covenants
contained in our debt agreements. See Liquidity and Capital Resources Restrictions and
Covenants below.
Chrysler and General Motors Bankruptcies
On April 30, 2009, Chrysler and several of its affiliates filed voluntary petitions for relief
under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the Bankruptcy Code). In connection with
the bankruptcy, Chrysler filed, and the bankruptcy court approved, a dealer consolidation plan to
close approximately 789 dealerships, including seven of our Chrysler dealerships. The bankruptcy
court also approved the sale of certain Chrysler assets to a new entity that will operate the
reorganized Chrysler business. The new Chrysler entity is owned primarily by the autoworkers
union retirement health care trust, Fiat, and the U.S. and Canadian governments. On June 10, 2009,
Chrysler completed the sale, and the new Chrysler entity assumed our remaining Chrysler franchise
agreements under which we will continue to operate our remaining Chrysler dealerships that were not
terminated in the bankruptcy.
On June 1, 2009, General Motors and several of its affiliates also filed voluntary petitions
for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. In connection with the bankruptcy, we entered
into wind-down agreements with General Motors pursuant to which we agreed to close four of our
dealerships by October 2010 in exchange for certain wind-down payments. At the same time, we
entered into participation agreements under which our remaining General Motors dealerships will
continue to operate as franchisees of the new General Motors formed as a result of the bankruptcy.
Certain of our dealerships with multiple General Motors franchises entered into a participation
agreement as to certain franchises and a wind-down agreement as to other franchises (such as
Pontiac, which General Motors is discontinuing as part of the bankruptcy). On July 5, 2009, the
bankruptcy court approved General Motors plan to sell certain assets to a new entity that will
operate the reorganized General Motors business, and, on July 10, 2009, General Motors completed
the sale. The new General Motors entity is owned primarily by the U.S. and Canadian governments,
the autoworkers union retirement health care trust and certain former bondholders and other
creditors of General Motors.
The operating results of the Chrysler dealerships that were closed in connection with the
Chrysler bankruptcy and of the General Motors dealerships that we agreed to close in the future
were not material to our consolidated financial statements.
Impact of Chrysler and General Motors Bankruptcies
During the second quarter of 2009, we classified as discontinued operations five of the seven
Chrysler dealerships that were closed in connection with the Chrysler bankruptcy and all of the
General Motors dealerships that we agreed to close in the future in connection with the General
Motors bankruptcy. The remaining two Chrysler stores that were closed in connection with the
Chrysler bankruptcy did not meet the criteria to be classified as discontinued operations due to
the expected migration of certain revenues associated with those stores to other stores. For the
second quarter of 2009, we recorded in discontinued operations estimated losses associated with the
Chrysler and General Motors bankruptcies of approximately $11 million (after-tax), including
expected losses on the disposition of real estate. There may be other adverse impacts resulting from the Chrysler and General Motors bankruptcies in
the future. For example, the new Chrysler entity and the new General Motors entity are not
expected to indemnify us for certain product liability claims.
The seven terminated Chrysler dealerships ceased operations on June 9, 2009, and the four
General Motors dealerships that we agreed to terminate are expected to close by June 30, 2010 or
earlier.
Inventory Management
Our new and used vehicle inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market on our
consolidated balance sheets.
24
We have generally not experienced losses on the sale of new vehicle inventory, in part due to
incentives provided by manufacturers to promote sales of new vehicles and our inventory management
practices. We reduced our new vehicle inventory to 31,275 units at June 30, 2009, from 50,311
units at December 31, 2008, and 53,733 units at June 30, 2008. Although we focus on managing our
inventory levels in accordance with consumer demand, we believe we must maintain a minimum level of
inventory at our lower volume stores that is representative of the full line of vehicles offered by
manufacturers. This may result in a higher days supply of inventory than would otherwise result if
we were in a better economic environment. However, given our inventory management practices (such
as managing our inventory purchases based on our sales forecasts and sharing inventory among stores
within a local market), we do not believe the current business climate is likely to result in
material impairment charges related to new vehicle inventory. We continue to monitor our new
vehicle inventory levels closely based on current economic conditions and will adjust them as
appropriate.
In general, used vehicles that are not sold on a retail basis are liquidated at wholesale
auctions. We record estimated losses on used vehicle inventory expected to be liquidated at
wholesale auctions at a loss. Our used vehicle inventory balance was net of cumulative write-downs
of $0.3 million at June 30, 2009, and $1.7 million at December 31, 2008.
Parts, accessories, and other inventory are carried at the lower of acquisition cost
(first-in, first-out method) or market. We estimate the amount of potential obsolete inventory
based upon past experience and market trends. Our parts, accessories, and other inventory balance
was net of cumulative write-downs of $4.4 million at June 30, 2009, and $6.3 million at December
31, 2008.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require us to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, and the reported
amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. We evaluate our estimates on an
ongoing basis, and we base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions we
believe to be reasonable. Actual outcomes could differ materially from those estimates in a manner
that could have a material effect on our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
For a complete discussion of our critical and significant accounting policies and estimates, please
see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
Goodwill and franchise rights assets are tested for impairment annually on April 30 or more
frequently when events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. As discussed
in Note 4 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, during 2008, we
recorded $1.61 billion ($1.37 billion after-tax) of non-cash goodwill impairment charges and $146.5
million ($90.8 million after-tax) of non-cash impairment charges related to franchise rights
intangible assets.
We completed our annual test for impairment of goodwill on April 30, 2009, and no goodwill
impairment charges resulted from the required impairment test. The goodwill impairment analysis is
dependent on many variables used to determine the fair value of our
reporting units.
As discussed in Note 4 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements,
we estimate the fair value of our reporting units using an income valuation approach, which
discounts projected free cash flows (DCF) of the reporting unit at a computed weighted average cost
of capital as the discount rate. If our income valuation approach had been a hypothetical 10%
lower for each of our reporting units as of April 30, 2009, we would have been required to complete
the second step of the
goodwill impairment test for our domestic reporting unit. For the domestic reporting unit,
which has a carrying value of $880.0 million at June 30, 2009, a 7% reduction in its estimated fair
value would have resulted in a failure of the first step of the goodwill impairment test. A first step
failure would have required us to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the
amount of implied fair value of goodwill and, if required, the recognition of a non-cash goodwill
impairment charge. We would have been in compliance with the financial covenants in our debt
agreements even if we had impaired all of the goodwill associated with our domestic reporting unit.
The effect of a hypothetical 10% decrease in valuation estimate is not intended to provide a
sensitivity analysis of every potential outcome.
We also completed our annual impairment test for intangibles with indefinite lives as of April
30, 2009, and we recorded $1.5 million ($0.9 million, net of tax) of non-cash impairment charges
related to rights under an Import stores franchise agreement. Our franchise rights, which related
to 20 franchises and totaled approximately $172.4 million at June 30, 2009, are evaluated for
impairment on a franchise-by-franchise basis. If the fair value of each of our franchise rights
had been determined to be a hypothetical 10% lower as of the valuation date of April 30, 2009, the
resulting incremental impairment charge would have been less than $5.0 million.
We will continue to monitor events in future periods to determine if additional asset
impairment testing should be performed. We continue to face a challenging automotive retail
environment and an uncertain economic environment in general. As a result of these conditions,
there can be no assurance that an additional material impairment charge will not occur in a future
period.
25
Reported Operating Data
Historical operating results include the results of acquired businesses from the date of
acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
($ in millions, except per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
vehicle
data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New vehicle |
|
$ |
1,339.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,062.0 |
|
|
$ |
(722.9 |
) |
|
|
(35.1 |
) |
|
$ |
2,524.5 |
|
|
$ |
4,133.7 |
|
|
$ |
(1,609.2 |
) |
|
|
(38.9 |
) |
Used vehicle |
|
|
632.6 |
|
|
|
868.6 |
|
|
|
(236.0 |
) |
|
|
(27.2 |
) |
|
|
1,224.8 |
|
|
|
1,771.6 |
|
|
|
(546.8 |
) |
|
|
(30.9 |
) |
Parts and service |
|
|
537.4 |
|
|
|
588.2 |
|
|
|
(50.8 |
) |
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
1,075.3 |
|
|
|
1,191.9 |
|
|
|
(116.6 |
) |
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
Finance and insurance, net |
|
|
89.0 |
|
|
|
128.4 |
|
|
|
(39.4 |
) |
|
|
(30.7 |
) |
|
|
166.0 |
|
|
|
265.0 |
|
|
|
(99.0 |
) |
|
|
(37.4 |
) |
Other |
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
2,609.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,663.6 |
|
|
$ |
(1,054.0 |
) |
|
|
(28.8 |
) |
|
$ |
5,015.5 |
|
|
$ |
7,395.1 |
|
|
$ |
(2,379.6 |
) |
|
|
(32.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New vehicle |
|
$ |
86.3 |
|
|
$ |
136.4 |
|
|
$ |
(50.1 |
) |
|
|
(36.7 |
) |
|
$ |
160.2 |
|
|
$ |
274.8 |
|
|
$ |
(114.6 |
) |
|
|
(41.7 |
) |
Used vehicle |
|
|
58.3 |
|
|
|
75.3 |
|
|
|
(17.0 |
) |
|
|
(22.6 |
) |
|
|
122.0 |
|
|
|
153.4 |
|
|
|
(31.4 |
) |
|
|
(20.5 |
) |
Parts and service |
|
|
235.9 |
|
|
|
257.3 |
|
|
|
(21.4 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
|
|
472.3 |
|
|
|
520.0 |
|
|
|
(47.7 |
) |
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
Finance and insurance |
|
|
89.0 |
|
|
|
128.4 |
|
|
|
(39.4 |
) |
|
|
(30.7 |
) |
|
|
166.0 |
|
|
|
265.0 |
|
|
|
(99.0 |
) |
|
|
(37.4 |
) |
Other |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit |
|
|
476.5 |
|
|
|
606.4 |
|
|
|
(129.9 |
) |
|
|
(21.4 |
) |
|
|
934.8 |
|
|
|
1,231.5 |
|
|
|
(296.7 |
) |
|
|
(24.1 |
) |
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
364.1 |
|
|
|
451.4 |
|
|
|
87.3 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
717.6 |
|
|
|
910.8 |
|
|
|
193.2 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise impairments |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other expenses (income), net |
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.3 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
102.3 |
|
|
|
134.1 |
|
|
|
(31.8 |
) |
|
|
(23.7 |
) |
|
|
198.0 |
|
|
|
277.6 |
|
|
|
(79.6 |
) |
|
|
(28.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floorplan interest expense |
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
(19.7 |
) |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19.1 |
) |
|
|
(42.5 |
) |
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other interest expense |
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
|
|
(21.6 |
) |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22.3 |
) |
|
|
(48.4 |
) |
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on senior note repurchases |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other gains (losses), net |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
operations before income taxes |
|
$ |
86.9 |
|
|
$ |
94.1 |
|
|
$ |
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
$ |
171.5 |
|
|
$ |
186.8 |
|
|
$ |
(15.3 |
) |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail vehicle unit sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New vehicle |
|
|
43,512 |
|
|
|
69,805 |
|
|
|
(26,293 |
) |
|
|
(37.7 |
) |
|
|
81,776 |
|
|
|
137,234 |
|
|
|
(55,458 |
) |
|
|
(40.4 |
) |
Used vehicle |
|
|
34,141 |
|
|
|
45,961 |
|
|
|
(11,820 |
) |
|
|
(25.7 |
) |
|
|
68,139 |
|
|
|
92,514 |
|
|
|
(24,375 |
) |
|
|
(26.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,653 |
|
|
|
115,766 |
|
|
|
(38,113 |
) |
|
|
(32.9 |
) |
|
|
149,915 |
|
|
|
229,748 |
|
|
|
(79,833 |
) |
|
|
(34.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue per vehicle retailed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New vehicle |
|
$ |
30,775 |
|
|
$ |
29,539 |
|
|
$ |
1,236 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
30,871 |
|
|
$ |
30,122 |
|
|
$ |
749 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Used vehicle |
|
$ |
16,239 |
|
|
$ |
15,837 |
|
|
$ |
402 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
15,854 |
|
|
$ |
15,958 |
|
|
$ |
(104 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit per vehicle retailed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New vehicle |
|
$ |
1,983 |
|
|
$ |
1,954 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,959 |
|
|
$ |
2,002 |
|
|
$ |
(43 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
Used vehicle |
|
$ |
1,667 |
|
|
$ |
1,651 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,742 |
|
|
$ |
1,667 |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Finance and insurance |
|
$ |
1,146 |
|
|
$ |
1,109 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,107 |
|
|
$ |
1,153 |
|
|
$ |
(46 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 (%) |
|
|
2008 (%) |
|
|
2009 (%) |
|
|
2008 (%) |
|
Revenue mix percentages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New vehicle |
|
|
51.3 |
|
|
|
56.3 |
|
|
|
50.3 |
|
|
|
55.9 |
|
Used vehicle |
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
Parts and service |
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
Finance and insurance, net |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
Other |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit mix percentages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New vehicle |
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
|
Used vehicle |
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
Parts and service |
|
|
49.5 |
|
|
|
42.4 |
|
|
|
50.5 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
Finance and insurance |
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
Other |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating items as a percentage
of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New vehicle |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Used vehicle retail |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Parts and service |
|
|
43.9 |
|
|
|
43.7 |
|
|
|
43.9 |
|
|
|
43.6 |
|
Total |
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Operating items as a percentage
of total gross profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
76.4 |
|
|
|
74.4 |
|
|
|
76.8 |
|
|
|
74.0 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Days supply: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New vehicle (industry standard
of selling
days, including fleet) |
|
53 days |
|
60 days |
Used vehicle (trailing 30 days) |
|
35 days |
|
41 days |
The following table details net new vehicle inventory carrying benefit (cost), consisting of
new vehicle floorplan interest expense, net of floorplan assistance earned (amounts received from
manufacturers specifically to support store financing of new vehicle inventory). Floorplan
assistance is accounted for as a component of new vehicle gross profit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Variance |
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floorplan assistance |
|
$ |
11.0 |
|
|
$ |
18.1 |
|
|
$ |
(7.1 |
) |
|
$ |
21.0 |
|
|
$ |
37.4 |
|
|
$ |
(16.4 |
) |
Floorplan interest expense (new vehicles) |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
(17.3 |
) |
|
|
(41.7 |
) |
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net new vehicle inventory carrying benefit (cost) |
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
(4.3 |
) |
|
$ |
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
Same Store Operating Data
We have presented below our operating results on a same store basis to reflect our
internal performance. The Same Store amounts presented below include the results of dealerships
for the identical months in each period presented in the comparison, commencing with the first full
month in which the dealership was owned by us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
($ in millions, except per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
vehicle
data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New vehicle |
|
$ |
1,324.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,048.4 |
|
|
$ |
(723.9 |
) |
|
|
(35.3 |
) |
|
$ |
2,496.4 |
|
|
$ |
4,103.6 |
|
|
$ |
(1,607.2 |
) |
|
|
(39.2 |
) |
Used vehicle |
|
|
624.4 |
|
|
|
856.4 |
|
|
|
(232.0 |
) |
|
|
(27.1 |
) |
|
|
1,207.8 |
|
|
|
1,745.9 |
|
|
|
(538.1 |
) |
|
|
(30.8 |
) |
Parts and service |
|
|
533.4 |
|
|
|
578.7 |
|
|
|
(45.3 |
) |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
1,066.0 |
|
|
|
1,172.3 |
|
|
|
(106.3 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
Finance and insurance, net |
|
|
88.4 |
|
|
|
127.4 |
|
|
|
(39.0 |
) |
|
|
(30.6 |
) |
|
|
164.6 |
|
|
|
262.7 |
|
|
|
(98.1 |
) |
|
|
(37.3 |
) |
Other |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
2,581.3 |
|
|
$ |
3,626.7 |
|
|
$ |
(1,045.4 |
) |
|
|
(28.8 |
) |
|
$ |
4,958.1 |
|
|
$ |
7,316.4 |
|
|
$ |
(2,358.3 |
) |
|
|
(32.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New vehicle |
|
$ |
85.8 |
|
|
$ |
135.6 |
|
|
$ |
(49.8 |
) |
|
|
(36.7 |
) |
|
$ |
158.7 |
|
|
$ |
273.1 |
|
|
$ |
(114.4 |
) |
|
|
(41.9 |
) |
Used vehicle |
|
|
57.5 |
|
|
|
74.2 |
|
|
|
(16.7 |
) |
|
|
(22.5 |
) |
|
|
120.1 |
|
|
|
150.8 |
|
|
|
(30.7 |
) |
|
|
(20.4 |
) |
Parts and service |
|
|
234.1 |
|
|
|
254.0 |
|
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
468.2 |
|
|
|
513.4 |
|
|
|
(45.2 |
) |
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
Finance and insurance |
|
|
88.4 |
|
|
|
127.4 |
|
|
|
(39.0 |
) |
|
|
(30.6 |
) |
|
|
164.6 |
|
|
|
262.7 |
|
|
|
(98.1 |
) |
|
|
(37.3 |
) |
Other |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit |
|
$ |
472.6 |
|
|
$ |
600.0 |
|
|
$ |
(127.4 |
) |
|
|
(21.2 |
) |
|
$ |
925.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,218.2 |
|
|
$ |
(292.8 |
) |
|
|
(24.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail vehicle unit sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New vehicle |
|
|
43,171 |
|
|
|
69,385 |
|
|
|
(26,214 |
) |
|
|
(37.8 |
) |
|
|
81,146 |
|
|
|
136,319 |
|
|
|
(55,173 |
) |
|
|
(40.5 |
) |
Used vehicle |
|
|
33,808 |
|
|
|
45,249 |
|
|
|
(11,441 |
) |
|
|
(25.3 |
) |
|
|
67,346 |
|
|
|
91,050 |
|
|
|
(23,704 |
) |
|
|
(26.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,979 |
|
|
|
114,634 |
|
|
|
(37,655 |
) |
|
|
(32.8 |
) |
|
|
148,492 |
|
|
|
227,369 |
|
|
|
(78,877 |
) |
|
|
(34.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue per vehicle
retailed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New vehicle |
|
$ |
30,680 |
|
|
$ |
29,522 |
|
|
$ |
1,158 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
30,764 |
|
|
$ |
30,103 |
|
|
$ |
661 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Used vehicle |
|
$ |
16,206 |
|
|
$ |
15,866 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
15,838 |
|
|
$ |
15,985 |
|
|
$ |
(147 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Gross profit per vehicle
retailed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New vehicle |
|
$ |
1,987 |
|
|
$ |
1,954 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,956 |
|
|
$ |
2,003 |
|
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
Used vehicle |
|
$ |
1,656 |
|
|
$ |
1,651 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,731 |
|
|
$ |
1,664 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Finance and insurance |
|
$ |
1,148 |
|
|
$ |
1,111 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,108 |
|
|
$ |
1,155 |
|
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 (%) |
|
|
2008 (%) |
|
|
2009 (%) |
|
|
2008 (%) |
|
Revenue mix percentages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New vehicle |
|
|
51.3 |
|
|
|
56.5 |
|
|
|
50.3 |
|
|
|
56.1 |
|
Used vehicle |
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
Parts and service |
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
Finance and insurance, net |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
Other |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit mix percentages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New vehicle |
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
Used vehicle |
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
Parts and service |
|
|
49.5 |
|
|
|
42.3 |
|
|
|
50.6 |
|
|
|
42.1 |
|
Finance and insurance |
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
Other |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating items as a percentage
of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New vehicle |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Used vehicle retail |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Parts and service |
|
|
43.9 |
|
|
|
43.9 |
|
|
|
43.9 |
|
|
|
43.8 |
|
Total |
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
29
New Vehicle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
($ in millions, except per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
vehicle
data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
Reported: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,339.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,062.0 |
|
|
$ |
(722.9 |
) |
|
|
(35.1 |
) |
|
$ |
2,524.5 |
|
|
$ |
4,133.7 |
|
|
$ |
(1,609.2 |
) |
|
|
(38.9 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
$ |
86.3 |
|
|
$ |
136.4 |
|
|
$ |
(50.1 |
) |
|
|
(36.7 |
) |
|
$ |
160.2 |
|
|
$ |
274.8 |
|
|
$ |
(114.6 |
) |
|
|
(41.7 |
) |
Retail vehicle unit sales |
|
|
43,512 |
|
|
|
69,805 |
|
|
|
(26,293 |
) |
|
|
(37.7 |
) |
|
|
81,776 |
|
|
|
137,234 |
|
|
|
(55,458 |
) |
|
|
(40.4 |
) |
Revenue per vehicle retailed |
|
$ |
30,775 |
|
|
$ |
29,539 |
|
|
$ |
1,236 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
30,871 |
|
|
$ |
30,122 |
|
|
$ |
749 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Gross profit per vehicle
retailed |
|
$ |
1,983 |
|
|
$ |
1,954 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,959 |
|
|
$ |
2,002 |
|
|
$ |
(43 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
Gross profit as a percentage
of revenue |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days supply (industry standard of
selling days, including fleet) |
|
53 days |
|
60 days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
Same Store: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,324.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,048.4 |
|
|
$ |
(723.9 |
) |
|
|
(35.3 |
) |
|
$ |
2,496.4 |
|
|
$ |
4,103.6 |
|
|
$ |
(1,607.2 |
) |
|
|
(39.2 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
$ |
85.8 |
|
|
$ |
135.6 |
|
|
$ |
(49.8 |
) |
|
|
(36.7 |
) |
|
$ |
158.7 |
|
|
$ |
273.1 |
|
|
$ |
(114.4 |
) |
|
|
(41.9 |
) |
Retail vehicle unit sales |
|
|
43,171 |
|
|
|
69,385 |
|
|
|
(26,214 |
) |
|
|
(37.8 |
) |
|
|
81,146 |
|
|
|
136,319 |
|
|
|
(55,173 |
) |
|
|
(40.5 |
) |
Revenue per vehicle retailed |
|
$ |
30,680 |
|
|
$ |
29,522 |
|
|
$ |
1,158 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
30,764 |
|
|
$ |
30,103 |
|
|
$ |
661 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Gross profit per vehicle
retailed |
|
$ |
1,987 |
|
|
$ |
1,954 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,956 |
|
|
$ |
2,003 |
|
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
Gross profit as a percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of revenue |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same store new vehicle revenue decreased $723.9 million or 35.3% during the three months
ended June 30, 2009, and $1.61 billion or 39.2% during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as
compared to the same periods in 2008, primarily as a result of a decrease in same store unit volume
partially offset by an increase in same store revenue per new vehicle retailed. The decrease
in same store unit volume was primarily due to the challenging automotive retail environment.
Results were adversely impacted by overall economic conditions, including reduced credit
availability offered to consumers, the discontinuation or limitation of certain manufacturer
leasing programs, and a decline in consumer confidence. Revenue per new vehicle retailed benefited
from lower fuel prices, which caused a shift in mix away from small, fuel-efficient vehicles that
have relatively lower selling prices. We expect that the automotive retail market will remain
challenging in 2009.
Same store gross profit per new vehicle retailed increased 1.7% during the three months ended
June 30, 2009, and decreased 2.3% during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the
same periods in 2008. The increase during the three months ended June 30, 2009, was due in part to
our continued efforts to maintain disciplined vehicle inventories, as well as due to an increase in
manufacturer incentives. The decrease during the six months ended June 30, 2009, was driven
largely by compressed margins for import vehicles due to an overall competitive retail environment.
Gross profit per new vehicle retailed was also impacted by more stringent consumer credit
conditions.
Our new vehicle inventories were $1.0 billion or 53 days supply at June 30, 2009, as compared
to new vehicle inventories of $1.5 billion or 82 days supply at December 31, 2008, and $1.7 billion
or 60 days supply at June 30, 2008. We reduced our new vehicle inventory to 31,275 units at June
30, 2009, from 50,311 units at December 31, 2008, and 53,733 units at June 30, 2008.
30
The following table details net new vehicle inventory carrying benefit (cost), consisting of
new vehicle floorplan interest expense, net of floorplan assistance earned (amounts received from
manufacturers specifically to support store financing of new vehicle inventory). Floorplan
assistance is accounted for as a component of new vehicle gross profit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Variance |
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floorplan assistance |
|
$ |
11.0 |
|
|
$ |
18.1 |
|
|
$ |
(7.1 |
) |
|
$ |
21.0 |
|
|
$ |
37.4 |
|
|
$ |
(16.4 |
) |
Floorplan interest expense (new vehicles) |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
(17.3 |
) |
|
|
(41.7 |
) |
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net new vehicle inventory carrying benefit (cost) |
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
(4.3 |
) |
|
$ |
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net new vehicle inventory carrying benefit (new vehicle floorplan interest expense net of
floorplan assistance from manufacturers) was $2.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009,
compared to a net new vehicle inventory carrying cost of $0.8 million during the three months ended
June 30, 2008, and $3.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to a net new
vehicle inventory carrying cost of $4.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008. The
increase in the net new vehicle inventory carrying benefit of $3.7 million during the three months
ended June 30, 2009, and $8.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009, is due to a
decrease in new vehicle floorplan interest expense primarily due to lower short-term LIBOR interest
rates and lower average vehicle floorplan payable balances, partially offset by a decrease in
floorplan assistance due to lower new vehicle sales and a decrease in the floorplan assistance rate
per unit.
31
Used Vehicle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
($ in millions, except per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
vehicle
data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
Reported: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail revenue |
|
$ |
554.4 |
|
|
$ |
727.9 |
|
|
$ |
(173.5 |
) |
|
|
(23.8 |
) |
|
$ |
1,080.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,476.3 |
|
|
$ |
(396.0 |
) |
|
|
(26.8 |
) |
Wholesale revenue |
|
|
78.2 |
|
|
|
140.7 |
|
|
|
(62.5 |
) |
|
|
(44.4 |
) |
|
|
144.5 |
|
|
|
295.3 |
|
|
|
(150.8 |
) |
|
|
(51.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
632.6 |
|
|
$ |
868.6 |
|
|
$ |
(236.0 |
) |
|
|
(27.2 |
) |
|
$ |
1,224.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,771.6 |
|
|
$ |
(546.8 |
) |
|
|
(30.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail gross profit |
|
$ |
56.9 |
|
|
$ |
75.9 |
|
|
$ |
(19.0 |
) |
|
|
(25.0 |
) |
|
$ |
118.7 |
|
|
$ |
154.2 |
|
|
$ |
(35.5 |
) |
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
Wholesale gross profit |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit |
|
$ |
58.3 |
|
|
$ |
75.3 |
|
|
$ |
(17.0 |
) |
|
|
(22.6 |
) |
|
$ |
122.0 |
|
|
$ |
153.4 |
|
|
$ |
(31.4 |
) |
|
|
(20.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail vehicle unit sales |
|
|
34,141 |
|
|
|
45,961 |
|
|
|
(11,820 |
) |
|
|
(25.7 |
) |
|
|
68,139 |
|
|
|
92,514 |
|
|
|
(24,375 |
) |
|
|
(26.3 |
) |
Revenue per vehicle retailed |
|
$ |
16,239 |
|
|
$ |
15,837 |
|
|
$ |
402 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
15,854 |
|
|
$ |
15,958 |
|
|
$ |
(104 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Gross profit per vehicle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
retailed |
|
$ |
1,667 |
|
|
$ |
1,651 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,742 |
|
|
$ |
1,667 |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Gross profit as a percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of revenue |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days supply (trailing 30 days) |
|
35 days |
|
41 days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
Same Store: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail revenue |
|
$ |
547.9 |
|
|
$ |
717.9 |
|
|
$ |
(170.0 |
) |
|
|
(23.7 |
) |
|
$ |
1,066.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,455.4 |
|
|
$ |
(388.8 |
) |
|
|
(26.7 |
) |
Wholesale revenue |
|
|
76.5 |
|
|
|
138.5 |
|
|
|
(62.0 |
) |
|
|
(44.8 |
) |
|
|
141.2 |
|
|
|
290.5 |
|
|
|
(149.3 |
) |
|
|
(51.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
624.4 |
|
|
$ |
856.4 |
|
|
$ |
(232.0 |
) |
|
|
(27.1 |
) |
|
$ |
1,207.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,745.9 |
|
|
$ |
(538.1 |
) |
|
|
(30.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail gross profit |
|
$ |
56.0 |
|
|
$ |
74.7 |
|
|
$ |
(18.7 |
) |
|
|
(25.0 |
) |
|
$ |
116.6 |
|
|
$ |
151.5 |
|
|
$ |
(34.9 |
) |
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
Wholesale gross profit |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit |
|
$ |
57.5 |
|
|
$ |
74.2 |
|
|
$ |
(16.7 |
) |
|
|
(22.5 |
) |
|
$ |
120.1 |
|
|
$ |
150.8 |
|
|
$ |
(30.7 |
) |
|
|
(20.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail vehicle unit sales |
|
|
33,808 |
|
|
|
45,249 |
|
|
|
(11,441 |
) |
|
|
(25.3 |
) |
|
|
67,346 |
|
|
|
91,050 |
|
|
|
(23,704 |
) |
|
|
(26.0 |
) |
Revenue per vehicle retailed |
|
$ |
16,206 |
|
|
$ |
15,866 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
15,838 |
|
|
$ |
15,985 |
|
|
$ |
(147 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Gross profit per vehicle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
retailed |
|
$ |
1,656 |
|
|
$ |
1,651 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,731 |
|
|
$ |
1,664 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Gross profit as a percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of revenue |
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same store retail used vehicle revenue decreased $170.0 million or 23.7% during the three
months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008, primarily as a result of a
decrease in same store unit volume partially offset by an increase in revenue per used vehicle
retailed. Same store retail used vehicle revenue decreased $388.8 million or 26.7% during the six
months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008, primarily as a result of a
decrease in same store unit volume. The decrease in used vehicle sales volumes was driven in part
by a reduction in traffic into our stores, which resulted from the challenging automotive retail
environment, including reduced credit availability offered to consumers, and a decline in consumer
confidence. Additionally, used vehicle sales volumes were adversely impacted by a decrease in
trade-in volume associated with new vehicle sales. Revenue per used vehicle retailed benefited
from a shift in mix toward premium luxury vehicles, which have a higher average selling price than
domestic and import vehicles. This benefit was partially offset, however, by a decrease in the
average revenue per used vehicle retailed for premium luxury vehicles. We expect that the
automotive retail market will remain challenging in 2009.
Same store gross profit per used vehicle retailed increased 0.3% during the three months ended
June 30, 2009, and 4.0% during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same periods
in 2008, as tighter inventories improved profitability per unit. Used vehicle inventory supply has
been impacted by the decline in new vehicle sales, which has reduced trade-in volume, as well as by
customers retaining their vehicles for longer periods of time. Additionally, reduced fleet
inventory has decreased the number of vehicles moving from fleet inventory to used vehicle
inventory. Gross profit per used vehicle retailed also benefited from a shift in mix toward premium
luxury vehicles, which have a higher average gross margin than domestic and import vehicles.
Used vehicle inventories were $194.3 million or 35 days supply at June 30, 2009, compared to
$139.7 million or 30 days at December 31, 2008, and $263.2 million or 41 days supply at June 30,
2008.
32
Parts and Service
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
($ in millions, except per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
vehicle
data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
Reported: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
537.4 |
|
|
$ |
588.2 |
|
|
$ |
(50.8 |
) |
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
$ |
1,075.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,191.9 |
|
|
$ |
(116.6 |
) |
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
$ |
235.9 |
|
|
$ |
257.3 |
|
|
$ |
(21.4 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
|
$ |
472.3 |
|
|
$ |
520.0 |
|
|
$ |
(47.7 |
) |
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
Gross profit as a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
percentage of revenue |
|
|
43.9 |
% |
|
|
43.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.9 |
% |
|
|
43.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
533.4 |
|
|
$ |
578.7 |
|
|
$ |
(45.3 |
) |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
$ |
1,066.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,172.3 |
|
|
$ |
(106.3 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
$ |
234.1 |
|
|
$ |
254.0 |
|
|
$ |
(19.9 |
) |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
$ |
468.2 |
|
|
$ |
513.4 |
|
|
$ |
(45.2 |
) |
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
Gross profit as a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
percentage of revenue |
|
|
43.9 |
% |
|
|
43.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.9 |
% |
|
|
43.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parts and service revenue is primarily derived from vehicle repairs paid directly by
customers or via reimbursement from manufacturers and others under warranty programs.
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, same store parts and service revenue decreased
$45.3 million or 7.8%, as compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease is primarily due to a
decline in revenues associated with the preparation of vehicles for sale of $14.8 million, warranty
revenues of $6.7 million, revenues from service work outsourced to third-parties of $5.0 million,
wholesale parts revenues of $5.9 million, and customer-paid revenues of $4.6 million.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, same store parts and service revenue decreased
$106.3 million or 9.1%, as compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease is primarily due to a
decline in revenues associated with the preparation of vehicles for sale of $33.2 million, warranty
revenues of $11.8 million, revenues from service work outsourced to third-parties of $11.7 million,
wholesale parts revenues of $16.7 million, and customer-paid revenues of $16.7 million.
Revenues associated with the preparation of vehicles for sale and revenues from service work
outsourced to third-parties were adversely impacted primarily by lower new and used vehicle unit
sales volume. Warranty revenues were also adversely impacted by lower vehicle sales and, to a
lesser extent, improved quality of vehicles manufactured in recent years. Wholesale parts revenues
and customer-paid revenues were adversely impacted by difficult market conditions. We expect that
the automotive retail market will remain challenging in 2009.
33
Finance and Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
($ in millions, except per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
vehicle
data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
Reported: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue and gross profit |
|
$ |
89.0 |
|
|
$ |
128.4 |
|
|
$ |
(39.4 |
) |
|
|
(30.7 |
) |
|
$ |
166.0 |
|
|
$ |
265.0 |
|
|
$ |
(99.0 |
) |
|
|
(37.4 |
) |
Gross profit per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vehicle retailed |
|
$ |
1,146 |
|
|
$ |
1,109 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,107 |
|
|
$ |
1,153 |
|
|
$ |
(46 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue and gross profit |
|
$ |
88.4 |
|
|
$ |
127.4 |
|
|
$ |
(39.0 |
) |
|
|
(30.6 |
) |
|
$ |
164.6 |
|
|
$ |
262.7 |
|
|
$ |
(98.1 |
) |
|
|
(37.3 |
) |
Gross profit per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vehicle retailed |
|
$ |
1,148 |
|
|
$ |
1,111 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,108 |
|
|
$ |
1,155 |
|
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
Same store finance and insurance revenue and gross profit decreased $39.0 million or 30.6%
during the three months ended June 30, 2009, and $98.1 million or 37.3% during the six months ended
June 30, 2009, as compared to the same periods in 2008, primarily due to lower new and used sales
volumes.
Same store finance and insurance revenue and gross profit per vehicle retailed increased 3.3%
during the three months ended June 30, 2009, and decreased 4.1% during the six months ended June
30, 2009, as compared to the same periods in 2008. Finance and insurance revenue and gross profit
during the three months ended June 30, 2009, was impacted by a favorable adjustment of $5.2 million
($3.2 million after-tax) of our reserves for expected chargebacks.
Finance and insurance revenue and gross profit per vehicle retailed for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, was adversely impacted by the current unfavorable economic conditions
in the United States, including lower commissions due to continued tightness in the automotive
lending environment, partially offset by an increase in finance and insurance products sold per
customer. We expect that the automotive retail market will remain challenging in 2009.
34
Segment Results
In the following table, total Segment Income (Loss) of the operating segments is reconciled to
consolidated operating income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
842.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,147.9 |
|
|
$ |
(305.5 |
) |
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
|
$ |
1,622.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,422.2 |
|
|
$ |
(799.7 |
) |
|
|
(33.0 |
) |
Import |
|
|
1,004.4 |
|
|
|
1,500.1 |
|
|
|
(495.7 |
) |
|
|
(33.0 |
) |
|
|
1,897.0 |
|
|
|
2,961.8 |
|
|
|
(1,064.8 |
) |
|
|
(36.0 |
) |
Premium Luxury |
|
|
733.9 |
|
|
|
988.3 |
|
|
|
(254.4 |
) |
|
|
(25.7 |
) |
|
|
1,437.8 |
|
|
|
1,950.7 |
|
|
|
(512.9 |
) |
|
|
(26.3 |
) |
Corporate and other |
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
58.2 |
|
|
|
60.4 |
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
2,609.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,663.6 |
|
|
$ |
(1,054.0 |
) |
|
|
(28.8 |
) |
|
$ |
5,015.5 |
|
|
$ |
7,395.1 |
|
|
$ |
(2,379.6 |
) |
|
|
(32.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Segment income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
25.8 |
|
|
$ |
32.9 |
|
|
$ |
(7.1 |
) |
|
|
(21.6 |
) |
|
$ |
48.0 |
|
|
$ |
70.1 |
|
|
$ |
(22.1 |
) |
|
|
(31.5 |
) |
Import |
|
|
41.6 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
|
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
|
|
(27.1 |
) |
|
|
70.9 |
|
|
|
112.3 |
|
|
|
(41.4 |
) |
|
|
(36.9 |
) |
Premium Luxury |
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
51.5 |
|
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
(16.9 |
) |
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
|
102.2 |
|
|
|
(18.4 |
) |
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
Corporate and other |
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
(27.1 |
) |
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.8 |
) |
|
|
(49.5 |
) |
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment income |
|
$ |
93.0 |
|
|
$ |
114.4 |
|
|
$ |
(21.4 |
) |
|
|
(18.7 |
) |
|
$ |
178.9 |
|
|
$ |
235.1 |
|
|
$ |
(56.2 |
) |
|
|
(23.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Floorplan interest expense |
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
42.5 |
|
|
|
(23.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
102.3 |
|
|
$ |
134.1 |
|
|
$ |
(31.8 |
) |
|
|
(23.7 |
) |
|
$ |
198.0 |
|
|
$ |
277.6 |
|
|
$ |
(79.6 |
) |
|
|
(28.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Segment income (loss) is defined as operating income net of floorplan interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail new vehicle unit sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
|
12,797 |
|
|
|
19,447 |
|
|
|
(6,650 |
) |
|
|
(34.2 |
) |
|
|
23,922 |
|
|
|
40,288 |
|
|
|
(16,366 |
) |
|
|
(40.6 |
) |
Import |
|
|
23,436 |
|
|
|
39,414 |
|
|
|
(15,978 |
) |
|
|
(40.5 |
) |
|
|
43,455 |
|
|
|
75,636 |
|
|
|
(32,181 |
) |
|
|
(42.5 |
) |
Premium Luxury |
|
|
7,279 |
|
|
|
10,944 |
|
|
|
(3,665 |
) |
|
|
(33.5 |
) |
|
|
14,399 |
|
|
|
21,310 |
|
|
|
(6,911 |
) |
|
|
(32.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,512 |
|
|
|
69,805 |
|
|
|
(26,293 |
) |
|
|
(37.7 |
) |
|
|
81,776 |
|
|
|
137,234 |
|
|
|
(55,458 |
) |
|
|
(40.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
Domestic
The Domestic segment operating results included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
842.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,147.9 |
|
|
$ |
(305.5 |
) |
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
|
$ |
1,622.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,422.2 |
|
|
$ |
(799.7 |
) |
|
|
(33.0 |
) |
Segment income |
|
$ |
25.8 |
|
|
$ |
32.9 |
|
|
$ |
(7.1 |
) |
|
|
(21.6 |
) |
|
$ |
48.0 |
|
|
$ |
70.1 |
|
|
$ |
(22.1 |
) |
|
|
(31.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail new vehicle unit sales |
|
|
12,797 |
|
|
|
19,447 |
|
|
|
(6,650 |
) |
|
|
(34.2 |
) |
|
|
23,922 |
|
|
|
40,288 |
|
|
|
(16,366 |
) |
|
|
(40.6 |
) |
Domestic revenue decreased $305.5 million or 26.6% during the three months ended June 30,
2009, and $799.7 million or 33.0% during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the
same periods in 2008, primarily due to lower vehicle sales. The decrease in sales was partially
offset by an increase in the average revenue per new vehicle retailed for domestic vehicles due to
a recovery in prices for large vehicles, including trucks and sport utility vehicles. A reduction
in the availability of customer financing, including the discontinuation or limitation of certain
lease programs for domestic vehicles, and low consumer confidence contributed to the decline in
sales volume from our Domestic stores. In the second quarter of 2009, each of Chrysler and General
Motors filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.
See Market Challenges above for a discussion of the Chrysler and General Motors bankruptcies and
their impact on our business.
Domestic segment income decreased $7.1 million or 21.6% during the three months ended June 30,
2009, and decreased $22.1 million or 31.5% during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared
to the same periods in 2008 primarily due to decreased revenues as a result of the competitive
retail environment. Domestic segment income was also impacted by a decrease in finance and
insurance gross profit per vehicle retailed as a result of the reduction in credit availability.
Domestic segment income as a percentage of segment revenue for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009, as compared to the same periods in 2008, benefited from a mix shift toward higher margin
parts and service business and a reduction in selling, general, and administrative expenses.
Import
The Import segment operating results included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,004.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,500.1 |
|
|
$ |
(495.7 |
) |
|
|
(33.0 |
) |
|
$ |
1,897.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,961.8 |
|
|
$ |
(1,064.8 |
) |
|
|
(36.0 |
) |
Segment income |
|
$ |
41.6 |
|
|
$ |
57.1 |
|
|
$ |
(15.5 |
) |
|
|
(27.1 |
) |
|
$ |
70.9 |
|
|
$ |
112.3 |
|
|
$ |
(41.4 |
) |
|
|
(36.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail new vehicle unit sales |
|
|
23,436 |
|
|
|
39,414 |
|
|
|
(15,978 |
) |
|
|
(40.5 |
) |
|
|
43,455 |
|
|
|
75,636 |
|
|
|
(32,181 |
) |
|
|
(42.5 |
) |
Import revenue decreased $495.7 million or 33.0% during the three months ended June 30, 2009,
and $1.06 billion or 36.0% during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same
periods in 2008, primarily due to lower vehicle sales, which resulted in an oversupply of inventory
in the market attributed in part to shifting consumer demand due to lower fuel prices. Import
segment income decreased $15.5 million or 27.1% during the three months ended June 30, 2009, and
$41.4 million or 36.9% during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same periods
in 2008. The decrease in segment income was driven largely by a decline in sales due to a
competitive retail environment. Import segment income was also impacted by a decrease in finance
and insurance gross profit per vehicle retailed as a result of tighter credit conditions. Import
segment income as a percentage of segment revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
as compared to the same periods in 2008, benefited from a mix shift toward higher margin parts and
service business and a reduction in selling, general, and administrative expenses.
36
Premium Luxury
The Premium Luxury segment operating results included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Variance |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
733.9 |
|
|
$ |
988.3 |
|
|
$ |
(254.4 |
) |
|
|
(25.7 |
) |
|
$ |
1,437.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,950.7 |
|
|
$ |
(512.9 |
) |
|
|
(26.3 |
) |
Segment income |
|
$ |
42.8 |
|
|
$ |
51.5 |
|
|
$ |
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
(16.9 |
) |
|
$ |
83.8 |
|
|
$ |
102.2 |
|
|
$ |
(18.4 |
) |
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail new vehicle unit sales |
|
|
7,279 |
|
|
|
10,944 |
|
|
|
(3,665 |
) |
|
|
(33.5 |
) |
|
|
14,399 |
|
|
|
21,310 |
|
|
|
(6,911 |
) |
|
|
(32.4 |
) |
Premium Luxury revenue decreased $254.4 million or 25.7% during the three months ended
June 30, 2009, and $512.9 million or 26.3% during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared
to the same periods in 2008, primarily due to lower vehicle sales and a decrease in revenue per
vehicle retailed. Premium Luxury segment income decreased $8.7 million or 16.9% during the three
months ended June 30, 2009, and $18.4 million or 18.0% during the six months ended June 30, 2009,
as compared to the same periods in 2008, primarily due to margin compression as a result of a
decrease in the average revenue per new vehicle retailed. Premium Luxury segment income as a
percentage of segment revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the
same periods in 2008, benefited from a mix shift toward higher margin parts and service business
and a reduction in selling, general, and administrative expenses.
37
Operating Expenses
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, selling, general, and administrative expenses
decreased $87.3 million or 19.3%. As a percentage of total gross profit, selling, general, and
administrative expenses increased to 76.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2009, from 74.4% for
the same period in 2008, resulting from a deleveraging of our cost structure due to the decline in
vehicle sales, partially offset by our cost savings initiatives. Selling, general, and
administrative expenses decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the
same period in 2008, primarily due to a $55.5 million decrease in compensation expense and a $10.7
million decrease in gross advertising expenditures, partially offset by a $1.8 million decrease in
advertising reimbursements from manufacturers.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, selling, general, and administrative expenses
decreased $193.2 million or 21.2%. As a percentage of total gross profit, selling, general, and
administrative expenses increased to 76.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2009, from 74.0% for
the same period in 2008, resulting from a deleveraging of our cost structure due to the decline in
vehicle sales, partially offset by our cost savings initiatives. Selling, general, and
administrative expenses decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the
same period in 2008, primarily due to a $128.3 million decrease in compensation expense, a $32.4
million decrease in gross advertising expenditures, partially offset by a $3.1 million decrease in
advertising reimbursements from manufacturers.
Compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, includes a $5.3 million
non-cash stock-based compensation expense adjustment as discussed in Note 9 of the Notes to Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Non-Operating Income (Expense)
Floorplan Interest Expense
Floorplan interest expense was $9.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as
compared to $19.7 million for the same period in 2008. Floorplan interest expense was $19.1
million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to $42.5 million for the same period in
2008. The decrease in floorplan interest expense of $10.4 million during the three months ended
June 30, 2009, and $23.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009, is primarily the result
of lower short-term LIBOR interest rates and lower average vehicle floorplan payable balances.
Other Interest Expense
Other interest expense was incurred primarily on borrowings under our term loan facility,
mortgage facility, revolving credit facility, and outstanding senior unsecured notes. Other
interest expense was $10.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, and $21.6 million for
the same period in 2008. The decrease in other interest expense of $11.1 million during the three
months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008, was primarily due to
a $5.2 million decrease in interest expense related to the cumulative repurchase of our floating
rate and 7% senior unsecured notes of $310.9 million since August 2008, a $3.6
million decrease in interest expense resulting from lower interest rates on our term loan facility, and a $1.9 million decrease
in interest expense resulting from lower levels of debt outstanding during the year associated with
our revolving credit facility and 9% senior unsecured notes.
Other interest expense was $22.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, and $48.4
million for the same period in 2008. The decrease in other interest expense of $26.1 million
during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008, was primarily
due to a $10.9 million decrease in interest expense related to the cumulative repurchase of
our floating rate and 7% senior unsecured notes of $310.9 million since August 2008, a $8.3 million decrease in interest expense resulting from lower interest rates on our term
loan facility, and a $5.2 million decrease in interest
expense resulting from lower levels of debt outstanding during the year associated with our
revolving credit facility and 9% senior unsecured notes.
38
Provision for Income Taxes
Our effective income tax rate was 36.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2009, and 41.0%
for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Our effective income tax rate was 37.1% for the six
months ended June 30, 2009, and 40.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Income taxes are
provided based upon our anticipated underlying annual blended federal and state income tax rates
adjusted, as necessary, for any other tax matters occurring during the period. As we operate in
various states, our effective tax rate is also dependent upon our geographic revenue mix. We
expect our underlying tax rate to be approximately 40% on an ongoing basis, excluding the impact of
any tax adjustments in the future.
Discontinued Operations
Discontinued operations are related to stores that were sold or terminated, that we have
entered into an agreement to sell or terminate, or for which we otherwise deem a proposed sales
transaction or termination to be probable, with no material changes expected. We had a loss from
discontinued operations totaling $18.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009, and
$3.7 million during the three months ended June 30, 2008, net of income taxes. We had a loss from
discontinued operations totaling $36.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009, and $8.1
million during the six months ended June 30, 2008. See Note 13 of our Notes to Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of discontinued operations. Certain amounts
reflected in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, have been adjusted to classify the results of these
stores as discontinued operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We believe that our cash and cash equivalents, funds generated through future operations, and
availability of borrowings under our secured floorplan facilities and revolving credit facility
will be sufficient to service our debt and fund our working capital requirements, pay our tax
obligations and commitments and contingencies, and meet any seasonal operating requirements for the
foreseeable future. For information regarding compliance with the financial covenants under our
debt agreements, refer to the discussion under the heading Restrictions and Covenants below.
At June 30, 2009, we had $128.9 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents. In the
ordinary course of business, we are required to post performance and surety bonds, letters of
credit, and/or cash deposits as financial guarantees of our performance. At June 30, 2009, surety
bonds, letters of credit, and cash deposits totaled $109.4 million, including $71.5 million of
letters of credit. We do not currently provide cash collateral for outstanding letters of credit.
See the table at the beginning of Note 5 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for the amounts of our notes payable and long-term debt as of June 30, 2009,
and December 31, 2008.
Senior Unsecured Notes and Credit Agreement
At June 30, 2009, we had outstanding $156.5 million of floating rate senior unsecured notes
due April 15, 2013, and $132.6 million of 7% senior unsecured notes due April 15, 2014, in each
case at par. The floating rate senior unsecured notes bear interest at a rate equal to three-month
LIBOR plus 2.0% per annum, adjusted quarterly, and may be redeemed by us currently at 102% of
principal, on or after April 15, 2010, at 101% of principal, and on or after April 15, 2011, at
100% of principal. The 7% senior unsecured notes may be redeemed by us currently at 105.25% of
principal, on or after April 15, 2010, at 103.5% of principal, on or after April 15, 2011, at
101.75% of principal, and on or after April 15, 2012, at 100% of principal.
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we repurchased $6.0 million aggregate principal
amount of our floating rate senior unsecured notes due April 15, 2013, for an aggregate total
consideration of $5.4 million.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we repurchased $38.0 million aggregate principal
amount of our floating rate senior unsecured notes due April 15, 2013, for an aggregate total
consideration of $31.4 million. We also repurchased $40.0 million aggregate principal amount of
our 7% senior unsecured notes due April 15, 2014, for an aggregate total consideration of $34.5
million.
39
We recorded a gain of $0.6 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009, and $12.5
million during the six months ended June 30, 2009, in connection with these repurchases, net of the
write-off of related unamortized debt issuance costs. The gain is classified as Gain on Senior
Note Repurchases in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Income Statements.
Under our amended credit agreement which terminates on July 18, 2012, we have a $700.0 million
revolving credit facility that provides for various interest rates on borrowings generally at LIBOR
plus 0.725% and a $600.0 million term loan facility bearing interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus
0.875%. We also have a letter of credit sublimit as part of our revolving credit facility. The
amount available to be borrowed under the revolving credit facility is reduced on a
dollar-for-dollar basis by the cumulative amount of any outstanding letters of credit, which
totaled $71.5 million at June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, we had no borrowings outstanding
under the revolving credit facility, leaving $628.5 million of borrowing capacity. As of June 30,
2009, this borrowing capacity was limited under the maximum consolidated leverage ratio contained
in our amended credit agreement to approximately $271 million.
The credit spread charged for the revolving credit facility and term loan facility is impacted
by our senior unsecured credit ratings from Standard & Poors (BB+, with negative outlook) and
Moodys (Ba2, with negative outlook). For instance, under the current terms of our amended credit
agreement, a one-notch downgrade of our senior unsecured credit rating by either Standard & Poors
or Moodys would result in a 25 basis point increase in the credit spread under our term loan
facility, a 20 basis point increase in the credit spread under our revolving credit facility, and a
5 basis point increase in the facility fee applicable to our revolving credit facility.
We may from time to time repurchase additional senior unsecured notes in open market purchases
or privately negotiated transactions. Additionally, we may in the future prepay our term loan
facility or other debt. The decision to repurchase senior unsecured notes or to prepay our term
loan facility or other debt will be based on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity
requirements, contractual restrictions, and other factors.
Other Debt
At June 30, 2009, we had $229.9 million outstanding under a mortgage facility with an
automotive manufacturers captive finance subsidiary due December 1, 2017. The mortgage facility
utilizes a fixed interest rate of 5.864% and is secured by 10-year mortgages on certain of our
store properties.
In 2000, we sold our corporate headquarters facility and leased it back in a transaction that
was originally accounted for as a financing. During the first quarter of 2009, we amended this
lease, resulting in a change in accounting method from financing to sale-leaseback. As a result of
this change, we derecognized $21.4 million of assets and a $37.9 million financing liability during
the first quarter of 2009, when we also recognized a $7.6 million gain on the sale, which is
recorded in Other Expenses (Income), Net. The remaining gain of $8.9 million and remaining rent
expense of $9.1 million are being recognized on a straight-line basis through the third quarter of
2009. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized $5.3 million of gain and $5.5
million of rent expense related to this transaction.
Vehicle floorplan payable-trade totaled $0.9 billion at June 30, 2009, and $1.4 billion at
December 31, 2008. Vehicle floorplan payable-trade reflects amounts borrowed to finance the
purchase of specific new vehicle inventories with manufacturers captive finance subsidiaries.
Vehicle floorplan payable-non-trade totaled $299.6 million at June 30, 2009, and $453.4 million at
December 31, 2008, and represents amounts payable borrowed to finance the purchase of specific new
and, to a lesser extent, used vehicle inventories with non-trade lenders. All the floorplan
facilities utilize LIBOR-based interest rates.
Floorplan facilities are due on demand, but in the case of new vehicle inventories, are
generally paid within several business days after the related vehicles are sold. Our manufacturer
agreements generally require that the manufacturer have the ability to draft against the new
floorplan facilities so the lender directly funds the manufacturer for the purchase of new vehicle
inventory. Floorplan facilities are primarily collateralized by vehicle inventories and related
receivables.
40
Share Repurchases and Dividends
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we did not repurchase any shares of our common
stock other than 6,174 shares that were surrendered to AutoNation to satisfy tax withholding
obligations in connection with restricted stock issued to retirement-eligible employees. As of
June 30, 2009, $142.7 million remained available for share repurchases under the existing
repurchase program approved by our Board of Directors. Future share repurchases are subject to
limitations contained in the indenture relating to our floating rate and 7% senior unsecured notes.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we repurchased 3.8 million shares of our common
stock for an aggregate purchase price of $54.1 million (average purchase price per share of
$14.37).
The decision to repurchase shares in the future will be based on such factors as the market
price of our common stock versus our view of its intrinsic value, the potential impact on our
capital structure (including compliance with financial ratios in our debt agreements), and the
expected return on competing uses of capital such as dealership acquisitions, capital investments
in our current businesses, or repurchases of our debt. In the first half of 2009, in light of the
economic conditions, our liquidity and capital resource strategies were focused on generating cash
and paying down debt to remain in compliance with the financial covenants in our debt agreements.
We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock during our two most recent
fiscal years. We do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The indenture
for our floating rate and 7% senior unsecured notes restricts our ability to declare cash
dividends. See Restrictions and Covenants below.
Restrictions and Covenants
Our amended credit agreement, the indenture for our floating rate and 7% senior unsecured
notes, our vehicle floorplan payable facilities, and our mortgage facility contain numerous
customary financial and operating covenants that place significant restrictions on us, including
our ability to incur additional indebtedness or prepay existing indebtedness, to declare cash
dividends, to create liens or other encumbrances, to sell (or otherwise dispose of) assets, and to
merge or consolidate with other entities.
For example, under the amended credit agreement, we are required to remain in compliance with
a maximum consolidated leverage ratio, as defined (3.0 times at each quarter-end through September
30, 2009, after which it will revert to 2.75 times on December 31, 2009). In March 2008, we
amended our credit agreement to provide that non-cash impairment losses associated with goodwill
and intangible assets as well as certain other non-cash charges would be excluded from the
computation of the maximum consolidated leverage ratio. We are also required to remain in
compliance with a maximum capitalization ratio (65%), as defined.
In addition, the indenture for the floating rate and 7% senior unsecured notes contains a debt
incurrence restriction based on a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio (2:1), and the mortgage
facility contains covenants regarding maximum cash flow leverage and minimum interest coverage.
The indenture for our floating rate and 7% senior unsecured notes restricts our ability to
make payments in connection with share repurchases, dividends, debt retirement, investments, and
similar matters to a cumulative aggregate amount that is limited to $500.0 million plus 50% of our
cumulative consolidated net income (as defined in the indenture) since April 1, 2006, the net
proceeds of stock option exercises, and certain other items, subject to certain exceptions and
conditions set forth in the indenture.
Our failure to comply with the covenants contained in our debt agreements could permit
acceleration of all of our indebtedness. Our debt agreements have cross-default provisions that
trigger a default in the event of an uncured default under other material indebtedness of
AutoNation.
During 2008, we recorded impairment charges of $1.76 billion ($1.46 billion after-tax)
associated with goodwill and franchise rights. For a complete discussion of these impairment
charges, please see Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. Despite these impairment charges, as of
June 30, 2009, we were in compliance with the requirements of the financial covenants under our
debt agreements. As of June 30, 2009, under our amended credit agreement, our consolidated
leverage ratio was 2.45 to 1, and our capitalization ratio was 51.2%, each as defined in our credit
agreement. Both the consolidated leverage ratio and the capitalization ratio limit our ability to
incur additional non-vehicle debt. The capitalization ratio also limits our ability to incur
additional floorplan indebtedness.
41
Our liquidity and capital resource strategies have been focused on generating cash and paying
down debt to remain in compliance with the financial covenants in our debt agreements. To the
extent that in the future we believe that we will be unable to comply with the covenants contained
in our amended credit agreement, we will seek an amendment or waiver of our amended credit
agreement, which could increase the cost of our debt. We may also consider other options, such as
raising capital through an equity issuance to pay down debt, which could be dilutive to
stockholders.
In the event of a downgrade in our credit ratings, none of the covenants described above would
be impacted. In addition, availability under the amended credit agreement described above would not
be impacted should a downgrade in the senior unsecured debt credit ratings occur. Certain covenants
in the indenture for the floating rate and 7% senior unsecured notes would be eliminated with an
upgrade of our senior unsecured notes to investment grade by either Standard & Poors or Moodys.
Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents increased by $18.8 million during the six months ended June 30,
2009, and $9.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008. The major components of these
changes are discussed below.
Cash Flows Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $230.9 million during the six months ended June
30, 2009, and $330.8 million during the same period in 2008.
Net cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared
to the same period in 2008, was impacted by a decrease in cash provided by changes in working
capital and a reduction in earnings, partially offset by an increase in cash provided by
discontinued operations.
Cash Flows Investing Activities
Cash flows from investing activities consist primarily of cash used in capital additions,
activity from business acquisitions, property dispositions, sales of investments, and other
transactions as further described below.
Capital expenditures, including property operating lease buy-outs, were $34.2 million during
the six months ended June 30, 2009, and $41.1 million during the same period in 2008. We project
that full year 2009 capital expenditures will be approximately $90 million.
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment including the disposal of property held for
sale were $12.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009, and $0.1 million during the same
period in 2008. Total cash received from business divestitures, net of cash relinquished, was
$40.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, and $12.3 million during the same period in
2008 related to discontinued operations.
Total cash used in business acquisitions, net of cash acquired, was $0.2 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009, and $29.4 million during the same period in 2008. We acquired one
automotive retail franchise and related assets in each period.
Cash Flows Financing Activities
Net cash flows from financing activities primarily include treasury stock purchases, stock
option exercises, debt activity, and changes in vehicle floorplan payable-non-trade.
We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during the six months ended June 30,
2009, other than 6,174 shares that were surrendered to AutoNation to satisfy tax withholding
obligations in connection with restricted stock issued to retirement-eligible employees. We
repurchased 3.8 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $54.1 million
(average purchase price per share of $14.37) during the six months ended June 30, 2008, including
repurchases for which settlement occurred subsequent to June 30, 2008.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we repurchased $38.0 million aggregate principal
amount of our floating rate senior unsecured notes for an aggregate total consideration of $31.4
million (including $0.2 million of accrued interest) and $40.0 million aggregate principal amount
of our 7% senior unsecured notes for an aggregate total consideration of $34.5 million (including
$1.0 million of accrued interest).
42
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options were $9.8 million (average exercise price per
share of $10.14) during the six months ended June 30, 2009, and $1.0 million (average exercise
price per share of $10.85) during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we had no borrowings or repayments under our
revolving credit facility. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we borrowed $519.0 million
and repaid $779.0 million outstanding under our revolving credit facility, for net repayments of
$260.0 million.
Cash flows from financing activities include changes in vehicle floorplan payable-non-trade
(vehicle floorplan payables with lenders other than the automotive manufacturers captive finance
subsidiaries for that franchise) totaling net repayments of $154.8 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009, and net borrowings of $61.5 million for the same period in 2008.
Seasonality
Our operations generally experience higher volumes of vehicle sales and service in the second
and third quarters of each year due in part to consumer buying trends and the introduction of new
vehicle models. Also, demand for vehicles and light trucks is generally lower during the winter
months than in other seasons, particularly in regions of the United States where stores may be
subject to adverse winter conditions. Accordingly, we expect our revenue and operating results to
be generally lower in the first and fourth
quarters as compared to the second and third quarters. However, revenue may be impacted
significantly from quarter to quarter by actual or threatened severe weather events, and by other
factors unrelated to weather conditions, such as changing economic conditions and automotive
manufacturer incentive programs.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1, Interim Financial Statements, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Forward-Looking Statements
Our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and prospects, and the
prevailing market price and performance of our common stock, may be adversely affected by a number
of factors, including the matters discussed below. Certain statements and information set forth in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as other written or oral statements made from time to
time by us or by our authorized executive officers on our behalf, constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Federal Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We
intend for our forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for
forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and
we set forth this statement in order to comply with such safe harbor provisions. You should note
that our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
or when made and we undertake no duty or obligation to update or revise our forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Although we
believe that the expectations, plans, intentions, and projections reflected in our forward-looking
statements are reasonable, such statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties,
and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially
different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by the
forward-looking statements. The risks, uncertainties, and other factors that our stockholders and
prospective investors should consider include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
The automotive retailing industry is sensitive to changing economic conditions and various
other factors. Our business and results of operations are substantially dependent on new
vehicle sales levels in the United States and in our particular geographic markets and the
level of gross profit margins that we can achieve on our sales of new vehicles, all of which
are very difficult to predict. |
|
|
|
|
Our results of operations and financial condition have been and could continue to be
adversely affected by the conditions in the credit markets and the declining economic
conditions in the United States. |
|
|
|
|
Our revolving credit facility, term loan facility, mortgage facility, and the indenture
relating to our senior unsecured notes contain certain financial ratios and other
restrictions on our ability to conduct our business. |
43
|
|
|
Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and operations
and prevent us from fulfilling our debt service obligations. |
|
|
|
|
We are dependent upon the success and continued financial viability of the vehicle
manufacturers and distributors with which we hold franchises. |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets comprise a significant portion of our total assets. We
must test our intangible assets for impairment at least annually, which could result in a
material, non-cash write-down of goodwill or franchise rights and could have a material
adverse impact on our results of operations and shareholders equity. |
|
|
|
|
Our new vehicle sales are impacted by the consumer incentive and marketing programs of
vehicle manufacturers. |
|
|
|
|
Natural disasters and adverse weather events can disrupt our business. |
|
|
|
|
We are subject to restrictions imposed by and significant influence from vehicle
manufacturers that may adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of
operations, cash flows, and prospects, including our ability to acquire additional stores. |
|
|
|
|
We are subject to numerous legal and administrative proceedings, which, if the outcomes are
adverse to us, could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations,
financial condition, cash flows, and prospects. |
|
|
|
|
Our operations, including, without limitation, our sales of finance and insurance and
vehicle protection products, are subject to extensive governmental laws and regulations. If
we are found to be in violation of or subject to liabilities under any of these laws or
regulations, or if new laws or regulations are enacted that adversely affect our operations,
our business, operating results, and prospects could suffer. |
|
|
|
|
We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with our floorplan payable, revolving
credit facility, term loan facility, and floating rate senior unsecured notes that could have
a material adverse effect on our profitability. |
|
|
|
|
Our largest stockholder, as a result of its voting ownership, may have the ability to exert
substantial influence over actions to be taken or approved by our stockholders. |
Please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008,
and to our subsequent filings with the SEC for additional discussion of the foregoing risks.
44
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Our primary market risk exposure is changing LIBOR-based interest rates. Interest rate
derivatives may be used to hedge a portion of our variable rate debt when appropriate based on
market conditions. At June 30, 2009, our fixed rate debt, primarily consisting of amounts
outstanding under senior unsecured notes and mortgages, totaled $376.5 million and had a fair value
of $352.0 million. At December 31, 2008, our fixed rate debt, primarily consisting of amounts
outstanding under senior unsecured notes and mortgages, totaled $465.1 million and had a fair value
of $377.8 million.
Interest Rate Risk
We had $1.2 billion of variable rate vehicle floorplan payable at June 30, 2009, and $1.8
billion at December 31, 2008. Based on these amounts, a 100 basis point change in interest rates
would result in an approximate change of $12.0 million at June 30, 2009, and $18.1 million at
December 31, 2008, to our annual floorplan interest expense. Our exposure to changes in interest
rates with respect to total vehicle floorplan payable is partially mitigated by manufacturers
floorplan assistance, which in some cases is based on variable interest rates.
We had $756.5 million of other variable rate debt outstanding at June 30, 2009, and $794.5
million outstanding at December 31, 2008. Based on the amounts outstanding, a 100 basis point
change in interest rates would result in an approximate change to interest expense of $7.6 million
at June 30, 2009, and $7.9 million at December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act)), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
We continue to centralize certain key store-level accounting and administrative activities,
which we expect will streamline our internal control over financial reporting. The initial or
core phase consists of implementing a standard data processing platform in the store and
centralizing to a shared services center certain key accounting processes (non-inventory accounts
payable, bank account reconciliations, and certain accounts receivable). We have substantially
implemented the core phase in 203 of our 210 stores as of June 30, 2009.
45
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
The following updates the corresponding risk factor included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008:
We are dependent upon the success and continued financial viability of the vehicle manufacturers
and distributors with which we hold franchises.
The success of our stores is dependent on vehicle manufacturers in several key respects.
First, we rely exclusively on the various vehicle manufacturers for our new vehicle inventory. Our
ability to sell new vehicles is dependent on a vehicle manufacturers ability to produce and
allocate to our stores an attractive, high-quality, and desirable product mix at the right time in
order to satisfy customer demand. Second, manufacturers generally support their franchisees by
providing direct financial assistance in various areas, including, among others, floorplan
assistance and advertising assistance. Third, manufacturers provide product warranties and, in some
cases, service contracts to customers. Our stores perform warranty and service contract work for
vehicles under manufacturer product warranties and service contracts, and direct bill the
manufacturer as opposed to invoicing the store customer. At any particular time, we have
significant receivables from manufacturers for warranty and service work performed for customers.
In addition, we rely on manufacturers to varying extents for original equipment manufactured
replacement parts, training, product brochures and point of sale materials, and other items for our
stores. Our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be materially adversely
affected as a result of any event that has a material adverse effect on the vehicle manufacturers
or distributors who are our primary franchisors.
Vehicle manufacturers may be adversely impacted by economic downturns or recessions,
significant declines in the sales of their new vehicles, increases in interest rates, declines in
their credit ratings, labor strikes or similar disruptions (including within their major
suppliers), supply shortages or rising raw material costs, rising employee benefit costs, adverse
publicity that may reduce consumer demand for their products (including due to bankruptcy), product
defects, vehicle recall campaigns, litigation, poor product mix or unappealing vehicle design,
governmental laws and regulations, or other adverse events.
Additionally, vehicle manufacturers are subject to federal fuel economy requirements, which
will increase substantially as a result of a new national program being implemented by the Obama
administration to regulate greenhouse gases and fuel economy standards. These new requirements
could materially adversely affect the ability of manufacturers to produce, and our ability to sell,
vehicles in demand by consumers at affordable prices, particularly larger vehicles, which represent
a significant portion of our business. These and other risks could materially adversely affect any
manufacturer and impact its ability to profitably design, market, produce, or distribute new
vehicles, which in turn could materially adversely affect our ability to obtain or finance our
desired new vehicle inventories, our ability to take advantage of manufacturer financial assistance
programs, our ability to collect in full or on a timely basis our manufacturer warranty and other
receivables, and/or our ability to obtain other goods and services provided by the impacted
manufacturer.
The core brands of vehicles that we sell are manufactured by Toyota, Ford, Honda, Nissan,
General Motors, Mercedes, BMW, and Chrysler. These manufacturers have been adversely impacted by
the unfavorable economic conditions in the United States and elsewhere. In the second quarter of
2009, each of Chrysler and General Motors filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of
the United States Bankruptcy Code. See Market Challenges in Part I, Item 2 of this Form 10-Q for
a discussion of the Chrysler and General Motors bankruptcies and their impact on our business.
Our business could be materially adversely impacted by another bankruptcy of a major vehicle
manufacturer or related lender. For example, (i) a manufacturer in bankruptcy could attempt to
terminate all or certain of our franchises, in which case we may not receive adequate compensation
for our franchises, (ii) such lender could attempt to terminate our floorplan financing and demand
repayment of any amounts outstanding, (iii) consumer demand for such manufacturers products could
be materially adversely affected, (iv) we may be unable to arrange financing for our customers for
their vehicle purchases and leases through such lender, in which case we would be required to seek
financing with alternate financing sources, which may be difficult to obtain on similar terms, if
at all, (v) we may be unable to collect some or all of our significant receivables that are due
from such manufacturer or lender, and we may be subject to preference claims relating to payments
made by such manufacturer or lender prior to bankruptcy, and (vi) such manufacturer may be relieved
of its indemnification obligations with respect to product liability claims. Additionally, any such
bankruptcy may result in us being required to incur impairment charges with respect to the
inventory, fixed assets, and intangible assets related to certain franchises, which could adversely
impact our results of operations, financial condition, and our ability to remain in compliance with
the financial ratios contained in our debt agreements. Tens of billions of dollars of U.S.
government support were provided to Chrysler, General Motors, and GMAC, and we believe that this
support mitigated the potential adverse impacts to us resulting from the Chrysler and General
Motors bankruptcies. There can be no assurance that U.S. government support will be provided to the
same extent or at all in the event of another bankruptcy of a major vehicle manufacturer or related
lender. As a result, the potential adverse impact on our financial condition and results of
operations could be relatively worse in a manufacturer or related lender bankruptcy which is not
financially supported by the U.S. government.
46
In addition to the information above and other information set forth in this Form 10-Q, you
should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which could materially affect our business,
financial condition, or future results.
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
On October 23, 2007, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program that
authorized us to repurchase up to $250 million in shares of our common stock. This program does
not have an expiration date. We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during the
second quarter of 2009. As of June 30, 2009, $142.7 million remained available for repurchases
under the repurchase program.
47
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. |
At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 6, 2009, our stockholders voted on the
following matters:
|
1. |
|
The election of eight directors, each for a term expiring at the next Annual Meeting or
until their successors are duly elected and qualified. |
|
|
2. |
|
The ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for 2009. |
|
|
3. |
|
The adoption of a stockholder proposal regarding special meetings. |
|
|
4. |
|
The adoption of a stockholder proposal regarding an independent chairman of the board. |
All of the director nominees were elected based on the following votes:
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Votes For
|
|
Withheld |
|
|
|
|
|
Rick L. Burdick
|
|
162,275,932
|
|
5,871,185 |
William C. Crowley
|
|
160,008,774
|
|
8,138,343 |
David B. Edelson
|
|
162,002,239
|
|
6,144,878 |
Kim C. Goodman
|
|
164,132,162
|
|
4,014,955 |
Robert R. Grusky
|
|
166,463,592
|
|
1,683,525 |
Mike Jackson
|
|
165,689,809
|
|
2,457,308 |
Michael E. Maroone
|
|
165,732,677
|
|
2,414,440 |
Carlos A. Migoya
|
|
154,499,532
|
|
13,647,585 |
The selection of KPMG LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for
2009 was ratified based on the following votes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
|
Broker Non-Votes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,712,532
|
|
344,810
|
|
89,775
|
|
- |
The stockholder proposal regarding special meetings was not approved based on the following
votes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
|
Broker Non-Votes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,026,836
|
|
128,575,902
|
|
522,851
|
|
18,021,528 |
The stockholder proposal regarding an independent chairman of the board was not approved based
on the following votes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
|
Broker Non-Votes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,349,005
|
|
128,956,023
|
|
820,561
|
|
18,021,528 |
48
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
49
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUTONATION, INC.
|
|
Date: July 31, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Michael J. Stephan
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Stephan |
|
|
|
Vice President -- Corporate Controller
(Duly Authorized Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
50