UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

Filed by the Registrant þ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

	o		Preliminary Proxy Statement
	o		Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
	þ		Definitive Proxy Statement
	o		Definitive Additional Materials
	o		Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

Compellent Technologies, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

o		No fee required.
o		Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

þ		Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o		Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

	(1)		Amount Previously Paid:
	(2)		Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
	(3)		Filing Party:
	(4)		Date Filed:

 

 

COMPELLENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

7625 Smetana Lane

Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344

(952) 294-3300

 

Dear Stockholder:

 

We cordially invite you to attend a special meeting of stockholders of Compellent Technologies, Inc., or Compellent, to be held at Compellent’s offices at 7625 Smetana Lane, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344, at 10:00 a.m., local time, on February 15, 2011, or the Special Meeting. Holders of record of Compellent common stock, $0.001 par value per share, at the close of business on January 4, 2011, will be entitled to vote at the Special Meeting or any adjournment of the Special Meeting.

 

At the Special Meeting, we will ask you to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 12, 2010, among Dell International L.L.C., Dell Trinity Holdings Corp. and Compellent, or the Merger Agreement, under which Dell Trinity Holdings Corp. will merge with and into Compellent, or the Merger, which will survive the Merger and become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dell International L.L.C. Dell International L.L.C. is a Delaware limited liability company and a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Dell Inc., a Delaware corporation. Dell Trinity Holdings Corp. is a Delaware corporation and is a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Dell International L.L.C.

 

We are also asking you to expressly grant us the authority to vote your shares to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the adoption of the Merger Agreement.

 

If the Merger is completed, you will be entitled to receive $27.75 in cash, without interest and less any applicable withholding taxes, for each share of Compellent common stock that you own, and you will have no ongoing ownership interest in the continuing business of Compellent. We cannot complete the Merger unless all of the conditions to closing are satisfied, including the adoption of the Merger Agreement by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Compellent common stock as of January 4, 2011, or the record date.

 

Our board of directors reviewed and considered the terms and conditions of the Merger and unanimously determined that the Merger is advisable and fair to and in the best interests of Compellent and its stockholders, unanimously approved and adopted the Merger Agreement and approved the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger, and unanimously recommended that our stockholders vote to adopt the Merger Agreement at the Special Meeting.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR”
THE ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT (AND, IF NECESSARY, TO
ADJOURN THE SPECIAL MEETING FOR THE PURPOSE OF SOLICITING ADDITIONAL PROXIES
TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF ADOPTING THE MERGER AGREEMENT).
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.

 

In connection with the Merger Agreement, certain Compellent stockholders, including three of our executive officers (two of whom are also directors) and funds affiliated with certain of our other directors, who beneficially owned, in the aggregate approximately 27.4% of the outstanding shares of our common stock as of the record date (including shares issuable upon the exercise of options held by such parties exercisable within 60 days of such date), each entered into a voting and support agreement with Dell International L.L.C., pursuant to which each stockholder has agreed, among other things, to vote all shares of our common stock that he or it owns in favor of the Merger and

the adoption of the Merger Agreement. In addition, as of the record date, Dell Inc. beneficially owned 342,884 shares of our common stock, representing approximately 1.1% of the outstanding shares of our common stock as of that date. Dell Inc. has advised the Company that it intends to vote its shares “FOR” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and “FOR” the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies.

 

In the materials accompanying this letter, you will find a Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders, a proxy statement relating to the actions to be taken by our stockholders at the Special Meeting and a proxy card. The proxy statement includes other important information about the Merger Agreement and the Merger. We encourage you to read the entire proxy statement and its annexes, including the Merger Agreement, carefully.

 

Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Special Meeting, please complete, sign, date and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope as promptly as possible or appoint a proxy over the Internet or by telephone as instructed in these materials. It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the Special Meeting. If you attend the Special Meeting, you may vote in person as you wish, even though you have previously returned your proxy card or appointed a proxy over the Internet or by telephone.

 

If your shares of Compellent common stock are held in street name by your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee, your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee will be unable to vote your shares of Compellent common stock without instructions from you. You should instruct your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee as to how to vote your shares of Compellent common stock, following the procedures provided by your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee. The failure to instruct your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee to vote your shares of Compellent common stock “FOR” approval of the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement will have the same effect as voting against the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement.

 

If you have any questions or need assistance voting your shares of Compellent common stock, please call MacKenzie Partners, Inc., our proxy solicitor, toll-free at (800) 322-2885.

 

On behalf of our board of directors, I thank you for your support and urge you to vote “FOR” the adoption of the Merger Agreement.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

Lawrence E. Aszmann

Secretary

 

January 14, 2011

 

THE MERGER HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE FAIRNESS OR MERITS OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTION CONTEMPLATED THEREBY, INCLUDING THE MERGER, OR UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS UNLAWFUL.

 

 

COMPELLENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
7625 Smetana Lane
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
(952) 294-3300

 

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 15, 2011

 

Dear Stockholder:

 

You are cordially invited to attend the Special Meeting of Stockholders of Compellent Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, or Compellent, that will be held at our offices at 7625 Smetana Lane, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344, at 10:00 a.m., local time, on February 15, 2011, or the Special Meeting, for the following purposes:

 

1. to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 12, 2010, among Dell International L.L.C., Dell Trinity Holdings Corp. and Compellent, or the Merger Agreement, under which Dell Trinity Holdings Corp. will merge with and into Compellent, or the Merger, which will survive the Merger and become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dell International L.L.C.; and

 

2. to consider and vote upon a proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary, for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies to vote in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement.

 

Dell International L.L.C. is a Delaware limited liability company and a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Dell Inc., a Delaware corporation. Dell Trinity Holdings Corp. is a Delaware corporation and is a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Dell International L.L.C.

 

Our board of directors reviewed and considered the terms and conditions of the Merger and unanimously determined that the Merger is advisable and fair to and in the best interests of Compellent and its stockholders, unanimously approved and adopted the Merger Agreement and approved the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger, and unanimously recommended that our stockholders vote to adopt the Merger Agreement at the Special Meeting. This item of business to be submitted to a vote of the stockholders at the Special Meeting is more fully described in the attached proxy statement, which we urge you to read carefully. Our board of directors also recommends that you expressly grant us the authority to vote your shares to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to adopt the Merger Agreement.

 

Stockholders of record at the close of business on January 4, 2011, or the record date, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Special Meeting and any adjournment of the Special Meeting. The proxy statement is dated January 14, 2011, and is first being mailed to stockholders of Compellent on or about January 18, 2011. Your vote is important. Adoption of the Merger Agreement will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Compellent common stock outstanding as of the record date.

 

Compellent stockholders will have the right to demand appraisal of their shares of Compellent common stock and obtain payment in cash for the fair value of their shares of Compellent common stock, but only if they perfect their appraisal rights and comply with the applicable provisions of Delaware law. A copy of the Delaware statutory provisions relating to appraisal rights is attached as Annex E to the attached proxy statement, and a summary of these provisions can be found under “The Merger — Appraisal Rights” in the attached proxy statement.

You should not send any certificates representing shares of Compellent common stock with your proxy card. Upon the closing of the Merger, you will be sent instructions regarding the procedure to exchange your stock certificates for the cash Merger consideration.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR”
THE ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT (AND, IF NECESSARY, TO
ADJOURN THE SPECIAL MEETING FOR THE PURPOSE OF SOLICITING ADDITIONAL PROXIES
TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF ADOPTING THE MERGER AGREEMENT).
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.

 

Your vote is very important, regardless of the number of shares you own. Even if you plan to attend the Special Meeting in person, we request that you complete, sign, date and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope, or appoint a proxy over the Internet or by telephone as instructed in these materials, to ensure that your shares will be represented at the Special Meeting if you are unable to attend. If you sign, date and mail your proxy card without indicating how you wish to vote, your proxy will be counted as a vote in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and, if necessary, to adjourn the Special Meeting for the purposes of soliciting additional proxies to vote in favor of adopting the Merger Agreement. If you fail to return your proxy card or if you fail to appoint a proxy over the Internet or by telephone, your shares will not be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Special Meeting and will have the same effect as a vote against the adoption of the Merger Agreement and the adjournment of the Special Meeting for the purposes of obtaining additional proxies to vote in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement. If you do attend the Special Meeting and wish to vote in person, you may withdraw your proxy and vote in person. If your shares are held in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the holder of record to be able to vote in person at the Special Meeting.

 

No person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations other than those set forth in the proxy statement in connection with the solicitation of proxies made hereby, and, if given or made, such information must not be relied upon as having been authorized by Compellent or any other person.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

 

Lawrence E. Aszmann

Secretary

 

January 14, 2011

Eden Prairie, Minnesota

 

 

In addition to delivering the proxy materials for the Special Meeting to be held on February 15, 2011 to stockholders by mail, the proxy statement for such meeting is also is available at www.compellent.com.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

This Summary Term Sheet, together with the “Questions and Answers About the Special Meeting and Merger,” highlights selected information in the proxy statement and may not contain all the information that may be important to you. You should carefully read this entire proxy statement and the other documents to which this proxy statement refers you for a more complete understanding of the matters being considered at the Special Meeting. In addition, you may obtain additional business and financial information about Compellent Technologies, Inc. without charge by following the instructions in “Other Matters — Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 82. We have included page references in parentheses to direct you to more complete descriptions of the topics presented in this summary. The Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 12, 2010, among Dell International L.L.C., Dell Trinity Holdings Corp. and Compellent Technologies, Inc., or the Merger Agreement, is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement. We encourage you to read the Merger Agreement, as it is the legal document that governs the merger of a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dell International L.L.C. with Compellent, referred to in this proxy statement as the Merger. In this proxy statement, “we,” “us,” “our” and “Compellent” refer to Compellent Technologies, Inc.

 

The Merger and the Merger Agreement.

 

The Parties to the Merger (see page 14).  Compellent Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a provider of fluid data storage solutions that automate movement and management of data at a granular level. Dell International L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, or Parent, is a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Dell Inc., a Delaware corporation, or Dell, a technology solutions provider in the IT industry. Dell Trinity Holdings Corp., a Delaware corporation, or Merger Sub, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dell International L.L.C. and has not engaged in any material business activities except in furtherance of the purpose of effecting the Merger.

 

The Merger (see page 15).  You are being asked to vote to adopt the Merger Agreement. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into Compellent with Compellent being the surviving corporation in the Merger. As a result of the Merger, Compellent will become a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent and will cease to be an independent, publicly-traded company. You will no longer have any interest in Compellent’s future earnings or growth. Following consummation of the Merger, the registration of Compellent common stock and our reporting obligations with respect to our common stock under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, will be terminated upon application to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. In addition, upon completion of the Merger, shares of our common stock will no longer be listed on any stock exchange, including the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE.

 

Merger Consideration (see page 59).  If the Merger is completed, you will be entitled to receive $27.75 in cash, without interest and less any applicable withholding taxes, for each share of Compellent common stock, $0.001 par value per share, or Compellent common stock, that you own (other than shares as to which appraisal rights have been properly exercised).

 

Treatment of Outstanding Stock Options (see page 60).  Each vested and outstanding stock option (including the options that will vest contingent upon the consummation of the Merger) that is not exercised immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger will be terminated and converted into the right to receive, with respect to each share of Compellent common stock subject to such stock option, a payment equal to the excess, if any, of $27.75 over the exercise price per share of such stock option, without interest and subject to applicable tax withholding. All of Compellent’s stock options that are outstanding and unvested immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger (other than any stock options that will vest contingent upon the consummation of the Merger) will be converted into options to purchase common stock of Dell.

 

Adoption of Stockholder Rights Plan (see page 64).  Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, we adopted a stockholder rights plan on December 15, 2010. Subject to certain limitations, we have agreed to not, without Parent’s prior written consent, amend or waive any provision of such rights plan or redeem any of the rights issued under such rights plan.

Conditions to the Merger (see page 71).  The consummation of the Merger by Parent and Merger Sub depends on the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions, including the following:

 

 

Parent and Merger Sub have made representations in the Merger Agreement that they will have sufficient cash available to pay the aggregate Merger consideration at the effective time of the Merger. Obtaining financing for the Merger is not one of Parent’s conditions to the closing of the Merger.

 

Restrictions on Solicitations and Board Recommendation (see pages 65 and 68).  Under the Merger Agreement we are not permitted to take or resolve or publicly propose to take any of the following actions:

 

 

In addition, the Merger Agreement provides that (subject to certain exceptions) our board of directors may not resolve, directly or indirectly, agree or publicly propose to take any of the following actions:

 

 

 

Notwithstanding these restrictions, under certain circumstances, and so long as Compellent complies with certain terms of the Merger Agreement described under “The Merger Agreement — Limitation on Soliciting, Discussing or Negotiating Other Acquisition Proposals” and “The Merger Agreement — Board Recommendation,” our board of directors may (i) respond to a bona fide unsolicited acquisition proposal not obtained in violation of our covenants in the Merger Agreement, (ii) recommend a “superior proposal” and, in connection with such recommendation, withdraw or modify its recommendation that our stockholders vote to adopt the Merger Agreement, and (iii) withdraw or modify its recommendation that our stockholders vote to adopt the Merger Agreement in response to a change in circumstances that does not relate to any acquisition proposal, where, among other things, the board of directors determines in good faith, after consultation with an independent financial advisor of nationally recognized reputation and its outside legal counsel, that failure to take such action would constitute a breach of its fiduciary duties to our stockholders under Delaware law.

 

Termination of the Merger Agreement (see page 72).  The Merger Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the effective time of the Merger even if (except as described below) our stockholders have adopted it at the Special Meeting and, in the case of a termination by us, provided that the termination fees and expenses described below have been paid, in the following circumstances:

 

 

Termination Fees (see page 74).  If the Merger Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances involving competing transactions, a change in our board of directors’ recommendation that our stockholders vote to adopt the Merger Agreement or certain other “triggering events,” we may be required to pay to Parent a termination fee of $37,000,000 and/or up to an additional $960,000 to reimburse Parent’s expenses. In addition, in connection with a termination of the Merger Agreement under certain circumstances involving a change in our board of directors’ recommendation that our stockholders vote to adopt the Merger Agreement due to a change in circumstances unrelated to an alternative acquisition proposal, we may be required to pay Parent a termination fee of $47,000,000 and up to an additional $960,000 to reimburse Parent’s expenses.

The Voting and Support Agreements.

 

As a condition of, and an inducement to, Parent entering into the Merger Agreement, on the date the Merger Agreement was executed, each of Philip E. Soran, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, John P. Guider, our Chief Operating Officer, Lawrence E. Aszmann, our Chief Technology Officer, and entities affiliated with El Dorado Ventures and Crescendo Ventures who collectively beneficially owned approximately 27.4% of outstanding shares of Compellent common stock as of the record date (including shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of such date), entered into a voting and support agreement with Parent to, among other things, vote his or its shares of Compellent common stock in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and against any inconsistent proposals or transactions.

 

Pursuant to the voting and support agreements, each of these stockholders also granted an irrevocable proxy to Parent and irrevocably appointed Parent as his or its proxy to vote his or its shares of Compellent common stock, among other things, in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and against any inconsistent proposals or transactions.

 

The obligations of the stockholders under the voting and support agreements continue generally until the earlier of (i) the date upon which the Merger Agreement is validly terminated, or (ii) the date upon which the Merger becomes effective. However, if the Merger Agreement (i) is validly terminated pursuant to an End Date Termination or No Vote Termination (as described under “Merger Agreement — Termination”) and an alternative acquisition proposal shall have been disclosed, announced, commenced, submitted or made at or prior to the termination of the Merger Agreement; or (ii) is validly terminated at any time after the occurrence of a “triggering event,” the obligations under the voting and support agreements continue until the date that is 275 days after the termination of the Merger Agreement.

 

As disclosed in a Schedule 13D filed by Dell on December 12, 2010, referred to as the Schedule 13D, on November 18, 2010, Dell adopted a Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plan, referred to as the 10b5-1 Plan, providing for the purchase in the open market, in compliance with the provisions of Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act, of Compellent common stock in an amount of up to $63.4 million during the period beginning on November 18, 2010 and continuing through January 28, 2011. Dell has disclosed in the Schedule 13D that concurrently with the adoption of the 10b5-1 Plan, Dell appointed UBS Securities, LLC as purchasing agent in connection with the 10b5-1 Plan, and instructed UBS Securities, LLC to purchase up to 1,560,000 shares of Compellent common stock at a price per share of less than $27.01 during the period from November 26, 2010 through December 23, 2010. During such period (through December 3, 2010), Dell acquired beneficial ownership of 342,884 shares of Compellent common stock. Accordingly, pursuant to the voting and support agreements and the 10b5-1 Plan, as of the record date, Dell may be deemed to have acquired beneficial ownership of approximately 28.5% of the outstanding shares of Compellent common stock (including shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of such date).

 

Dell has disclosed in the Schedule 13D that Dell may in the future acquire additional shares of Compellent common stock under the 10b5-1 Plan, if Compellent common stock trades at prices below $27.01 per share, and may also effect open market purchases of Compellent common stock outside the 10b5-1 Plan at prevailing market prices to the extent equal to or below the price of $27.75 per share. As of January 12, 2011, Dell has not made any additional purchases under the 10b5-1 Trading Plan. Dell has advised Compellent that it intends to vote its shares of Compellent common stock in favor of the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies. Compellent was not aware of the existence of the 10b5-1 Plan or of Dell’s purchases of Compellent common stock prior to the execution of the Merger Agreement.

 

The form of voting and support agreement is attached as Annex B to this proxy statement. For a more complete description of the voting and support agreements, see “The Voting and Support Agreements” beginning on page 76.

The Special Meeting of Compellent Stockholders.

 

See “Questions and Answers About the Special Meeting and Merger” beginning on page 8 and “The Special Meeting” beginning on page 56.

 

Other Important Considerations.

 

Board Recommendation.  Our board of directors recommends that Compellent stockholders vote “FOR” the adoption of the Merger Agreement, and “FOR” the adjournment of the Special Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies. See “The Merger — Reasons for the Merger of Compellent and Recommendation of the Board of Directors” beginning on page 22.

 

Reasons for the Merger.  For a discussion of the material factors considered by our board of directors in reaching their conclusions and the reasons why our board of directors determined that the Merger is advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of Compellent and our stockholders, see “The Merger — Reasons for the Merger of Compellent and Recommendation of the Board of Directors” beginning on page 22.

 

Share Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers.  See “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” beginning on page 80.

 

Interests of Compellent’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger.  In considering the recommendation of our board of directors in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement, you should be aware that there are provisions of the Merger Agreement that will result in certain benefits to our directors and executive officers, including the continuation of certain indemnification and insurance arrangements and the acceleration of stock options. See “The Merger — Interests of Our Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger” beginning on page 44.

 

As of January 4, 2011, our directors and executive officers collectively beneficially held, including shares subject to stock options exercisable within 60 days of January 4, 2010, approximately 29.1% of the outstanding shares of Compellent common stock. See “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” beginning on page 80.

 

Opinions of Compellent’s Advisors.

 

At the meeting of Compellent’s board of directors on December 12, 2010, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, or Morgan Stanley, rendered its oral opinion, which was subsequently confirmed in writing, that, as of that date, and based upon and subject to the various assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the scope of review undertaken by Morgan Stanley, as set forth in its opinion, the consideration to be received by the holders of shares of Compellent common stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement was fair from a financial point of view to such holders. At the time of such oral opinion, the consideration to be received by holders of Compellent common stock was expected to be $27.50 per share. The full text of the written opinion of Morgan Stanley dated December 12, 2010 is attached to this proxy statement as Annex C and is incorporated herein by reference. Subsequent to Morgan Stanley making a presentation to Compellent’s board of directors and rendering its oral opinion on December 12, 2010, the Merger consideration was increased by $0.25 per share. Morgan Stanley confirmed in writing the oral opinion that had been previously rendered on December 12, 2010. Morgan Stanley was not requested by Compellent’s board of directors to update the prior opinion that had been rendered to the board. Accordingly, the text of the written opinion attached as Annex C reflects the consideration of $27.50 per share that was expected to be paid as of December 12, 2010 rather than the $27.75 per share that was subsequently agreed to and set forth in the Merger Agreement. Morgan Stanley provided its opinion for the information of the Compellent board of directors in connection with and for the purposes of the evaluation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Morgan Stanley’s opinion is directed to Compellent’s board of directors and addresses only the fairness from a financial point of view of the consideration to be received by holders of Compellent common stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement as of the date of the opinion. It does not address any other aspects of the Merger and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder of Compellent as to how such stockholder should vote with respect to any matter or whether to take any other action with respect to the proposed transaction.

At the meeting of Compellent’s board of directors on December 12, 2010, Blackstone Advisory Partners L.P., or Blackstone, rendered its oral opinion, which opinion was subsequently confirmed in writing, that, as of that date, and based upon and subject to the assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the scope of review undertaken by Blackstone, as set forth in its opinion, the consideration to be paid to the holders of shares of Compellent common stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement was fair to such holders from a financial point of view. At the time of such oral opinion, the consideration to be received by holders of Compellent common stock was expected to be $27.50 per share. The full text of the written opinion of Blackstone dated December 12, 2010 is attached to this proxy statement as Annex D and is incorporated herein by reference. Subsequent to Blackstone making a presentation to Compellent’s board of directors and rendering its oral opinion on December 12, 2010, the Merger consideration was increased by $0.25 per share. Blackstone confirmed in writing the oral opinion that had been previously rendered on December 12, 2010. Blackstone was not requested by Compellent’s board of directors to update the prior opinion that had been rendered to the board. Accordingly, the text of the written opinion attached as Annex D reflects the consideration of $27.50 per share that was expected to be paid as of December 12, 2010 rather than the $27.75 per share that was subsequently agreed to and set forth in the Merger Agreement. Blackstone’s opinion was provided to our board of directors in connection with and for the purposes of its evaluation of the Merger only and it does not address any other aspect or implication of the proposed Merger, the Merger Agreement or any other agreement or understanding entered into in connection with the Merger or otherwise. Blackstone’s opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as to how any stockholder should vote with respect to the Merger or other matters. The opinion speaks only as of the date of such opinion and Blackstone is under no obligation to confirm or update its opinion as of a later date.

 

See “Opinions of Compellent’s Advisors” beginning on page 26.

 

Regulatory Matters (see page 54).  The Merger Agreement requires us and Parent to use our and their commercially reasonable efforts to prepare any merger notifications and obtain expiration or termination of any applicable waiting period required to close the Merger under the HSR Act. The Merger Agreement also requires us and Parent to use our and their commercially reasonable efforts to obtain authorizations, consents, orders or approvals of, declarations, or expirations of waiting periods imposed by and/or provide notice to governmental bodies, including antitrust or competition law authorities, in any applicable foreign jurisdictions.

 

Compellent and Parent have agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the expiration or termination of each waiting period (if any) and to obtain any consent necessary, including commercially reasonable efforts to resolve such objections, if any, as any governmental body may assert under any antitrust or competition law.

 

Tax Consequences (see page 51).  The Merger will be a taxable transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes if you are a U.S. person, as defined under “The Merger — Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger.” If you are a U.S. person, your receipt of cash in exchange for your shares of Compellent common stock in the Merger generally will cause you to recognize a gain or loss measured by the difference, if any, between the cash you receive in the Merger, determined before the deduction of any applicable withholding taxes, and your adjusted tax basis in your shares of Compellent common stock. Under U.S. federal income tax law, you will be subject to information reporting on cash received in the Merger unless an exemption applies. Backup withholding may also apply with respect to cash you receive in the Merger, unless you provide proof of an applicable exemption or a correct taxpayer identification number and otherwise comply with the applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. You should consult your own tax advisor for a full understanding of how the Merger will affect your U.S. federal, state and local and/or foreign taxes and, if applicable, the tax consequences of the receipt of cash in connection with the termination of, and full payment for, your stock options to purchase shares of Compellent common stock, including the transactions described in this proxy statement relating to our other equity compensation and benefit plans.

 

Appraisal Rights (see page 48).  Shares of Compellent common stock that are outstanding immediately prior to the Merger and held by any dissenting stockholder who properly perfects his, her or its appraisal rights will not be converted into the right to receive the Merger consideration. Instead, the dissenting stockholder will be entitled to an appraisal and payment for his, her or its dissenting shares in accordance with and subject to Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DGCL. In addition, a copy of Section 262 of the DGCL is attached as Annex E to this proxy statement.

Stockholder Litigation (see page 55).  Between December 15, 2010 and December 22, 2010, several putative class action lawsuits have been filed against the members of our board of directors, Parent and Merger Sub arising out of the Merger, referred to collectively as the Lawsuits. The Lawsuits allege that the members of our board of directors breached their fiduciary duties of care, loyalty, good faith, candor and independence to our stockholders by entering into the Merger Agreement because they, among other things (i) failed to maximize stockholder value; (ii) prematurely announced their decision to sell Compellent to Parent to depress the stock price, (iii) failed to exercise valid business judgment in connection with the Merger Agreement, (iv) acted to better their own interests at the expense of Compellent’s public stockholders, and (v) agreed to preclusive deal protection terms. Plaintiffs seek to stop or delay the acquisition of Compellent by Merger Sub and Parent or rescission of the Merger in the event it is consummated and seek monetary damages in an unspecified amount.

 

The following questions and answers are intended to address briefly some commonly asked questions regarding the Merger, the Merger Agreement and the Special Meeting. These questions and answers may not address all questions that may be important to you as a stockholder of Compellent. Please refer to the “Summary Term Sheet” and the more detailed information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement, the annexes to this proxy statement and the documents referred to in this proxy statement, all of which you should read carefully. You may obtain the information incorporated by reference in this proxy statement without charge by following the instructions under “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 82.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This proxy statement, and the documents to which we refer you in this proxy statement, include forward-looking statements based on estimates and assumptions. There are forward-looking statements throughout this proxy statement, including, without limitation, under the headings “Summary Term Sheet,” “The Merger,” “The Special Meeting,” “Unaudited Financial Forecasts,” “Opinions of Compellent’s Advisors” and in statements containing words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “contemplates,” “continues,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “likely,” “may,” “predict,” “potential,” “projects,” “should,” “will,” or “would” or other similar words or phrases. These statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, including, among others:

 

 

In addition, we are subject to risks and uncertainties and other factors detailed in our filings with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and our most recent quarterly report on Form 10-Q and in subsequent filings with the SEC, which should be read in conjunction with this proxy statement. See “Other Matters — Where You Can Find More Information” on page 82. Many of the factors that will impact the completion of the proposed Merger are beyond our ability to control or predict. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements contained in this proxy statement, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. We cannot guarantee any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. The statements made in this proxy statement represent our views as of the date of this proxy statement, and it should not be assumed that the statements made in this proxy statement remain accurate as of any future date. Moreover, we assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements, except as required by law.

 

Compellent Technologies, Inc.

 

Compellent is a Delaware corporation with headquarters in Eden Prairie, Minnesota. We are a provider of fluid data storage solutions that automate movement and management of data at a granular level. Our principal executive offices are located at 7625 Smetana Lane, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344, and our telephone number is (952) 294-3300. For more information about us, please visit our website at www.compellent.com. Our website address is provided as an inactive textual reference only. The information provided on our website is not part of this proxy statement, and therefore is not incorporated herein by reference. Our common stock is publicly traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “CML.”

 

Dell International L.L.C.

 

Dell International L.L.C. is a Delaware limited liability company and a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Dell, a Delaware corporation with headquarters in Round Rock, Texas. Dell is a leading technology company that offers a broad range of product categories, including mobility products, desktop PCs, software and peripherals, servers and networking, and storage. Dell’s services include a broad range of configurable IT and business related services, including infrastructure technology, consulting and applications, and business process services. The principal executive offices of Dell International L.L.C. are located at One Dell Way, RR 1-33, Round Rock, Texas, and its telephone number is (800) BUY-DELL. For more information about Dell and its affiliates, please visit its website at www.dell.com. This website address is provided as an inactive textual reference only. The information provided on Dell’s website is not part of this proxy statement, and therefore is not incorporated by reference. Dell’s common stock is publicly traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the ticker symbol “DELL.”

 

Dell Trinity Holdings Corp.

 

Dell Trinity Holdings Corp. is a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dell International L.L.C. and has not engaged in any material business activities other than in connection with its formation and the Merger. The principal executive offices of Dell Trinity Holdings Corp. are located at One Dell Way, RR 1-33, Round Rock, Texas, and its telephone number is (800) BUY-DELL.

 

The discussion of the Merger and the Merger Agreement contained in this section summarizes the material terms of the Merger and the Merger Agreement. Although we believe that the description covers the material terms of the Merger and the Merger Agreement, this summary may not contain all of the information that is important to you. We urge you to read this proxy statement, the Merger Agreement, a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement as Annex A, and the other documents referred to herein (including the annexes) carefully for a more complete understanding of the Merger and the Merger Agreement.

 

Background of the Merger

 

On August 30, 2010, Brad Anderson, Senior Vice President, Enterprise Product Group of Dell, asked Mr. Soran, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, if representatives from Dell could visit Compellent and have Compellent provide a presentation regarding Compellent’s business and products on September 7, 2010, for the purpose of understanding Compellent better in view of a potential strategic transaction between the two companies.

 

On or about September 1, 2010, Mr. Soran informed the members of Compellent’s board of directors of Dell’s request for a meeting with Compellent to discuss a potential strategic transaction. Members of the board of directors indicated their support for preliminary discussions with Dell to occur.

 

On September 3, 2010, Darren Thomas, Vice President and General Manager, Enterprise Storage Business of Dell, and Mr. Soran had a general introductory call regarding Compellent and its products.

 

On September 7, 2010, select members of Compellent’s management team presented an overview of Compellent and its products to Dell storage management team members in Minnesota.

 

On September 10, 2010, Mr. Anderson contacted Mr. Soran and indicated that Dell believed that further discussions were warranted.

 

On September 17, 2010, select members from Compellent’s management team presented another overview of Compellent and its products to another group of Dell storage management team members at Compellent’s headquarters.

 

On September 20, 2010, Compellent’s board of directors held a special meeting with a representative of Cooley LLP, or Cooley, outside counsel to Compellent, and members of management present. At the meeting, Compellent’s board of directors interviewed potential financial advisory firms and Cooley apprised the board of directors of their fiduciary duties in the context of a potential acquisition. The board of directors authorized management of Compellent to select the financial advisor that they, based on input from Compellent’s board of directors, determined would be the appropriate party to fill the financial advisory role in the context of a potential acquisition of Compellent.

 

On September 21, 2010, Mr. Anderson asked Mr. Soran to meet with him and David Johnson, Senior Vice President of Corporate Strategy for Dell, and Christopher Kleiman, Vice President of Corporate Development for Dell, in New York City on September 23, 2010.

 

On September 23, 2010, Mr. Soran met with Messrs. Anderson, Johnson and Kleiman in New York City, and the Dell representatives discussed with Mr. Soran a non-binding indication of interest to purchase Compellent at a price range between $23.00 and $25.00 per share, conditioned upon an agreement to enter into a 30-day exclusivity period. After the meeting, Mr. Kleiman delivered to Mr. Soran a written proposal consistent with this conversation.

 

On September 24, 2010, Compellent engaged each of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, or Morgan Stanley, and Blackstone Advisory Partners L.P., or Blackstone, to serve as a financial advisor to Compellent in the context of a potential acquisition of Compellent.

 

On September 24, 2010, Compellent’s board of directors held a special meeting with representatives from Cooley, Morgan Stanley and Blackstone and members of management present. At the meeting, the board of directors discussed the proposal from Dell and determined that it needed additional time to consider the proposal and to assess whether there were other potential parties interested in acquiring Compellent. A representative from

Cooley apprised the board of directors of their fiduciary duties in the context of a potential acquisition. The board of directors determined that it would be appropriate for Compellent’s financial advisors to reach out to a number of other strategic parties whom the financial advisors and management believed would be the most likely to have an interest in acquiring Compellent due to the potential acquirers’ product needs or potential synergies to determine whether any of these parties wanted to engage in acquisition discussions before responding to the Dell proposal.

 

On September 25, 2010, Michael Dell, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Dell, contacted Mr. Soran and confirmed that Dell was interested in acquiring Compellent.

 

On September 26, 2010, Mr. Soran informed Mr. Kleiman that Compellent needed further time to consider the indication of interest and asked for an extension of the indication of interest, which was set to expire on September 26. Dell agreed to extend their proposal until September 28.

 

From September 27, 2010 through September 30, 2010, Morgan Stanley and Blackstone reached out to Company A, Company B and Company C, each a large computer company, to determine whether any of them had interest in pursuing a potential strategic transaction with Compellent. None of these companies indicated any interest in further discussions with Compellent at the time.

 

On September 28, 2010, Dell’s original indication of interest expired.

 

On October 1, 2010, Compellent’s board of directors held a special meeting with representatives from Cooley, Morgan Stanley and Blackstone and members of management present. Morgan Stanley and Blackstone provided a presentation to the board of directors regarding their preliminary financial analyses of Dell’s proposal to acquire Compellent for between $23.00 to $25.00 per share and strategic alternatives for Compellent, including the potential value of Compellent as a stand alone entity both on a long- and short-term basis. The financial advisors also discussed the feedback from the meetings held with Company A, Company B and Company C. The board of directors evaluated the potential risks and benefits of pursuing other potential buyers taking into account the advice of its financial advisors and Cooley. Cooley apprised the board of directors of their fiduciary duties in the context of a potential acquisition. The board of directors determined not to pursue additional buyers at this time and to present a counter-proposal to Dell that tied giving Dell 30-day exclusivity to complete due diligence and negotiations to a price of $35.00 per share or proceed with no exclusivity at $32.00 per share.

 

On October 1, 2010, representatives of Morgan Stanley and Blackstone and Mr. Soran contacted Mr. Kleiman and indicated that Compellent was interested in making a counter-proposal to Dell.

 

On October 3, 2010, Mr. Kleiman indicated to a representative of Morgan Stanley that he would follow-up with Compellent if Dell was interested in pursuing further conversations.

 

On October 7, 2010, representatives of Morgan Stanley and Blackstone and Mr. Soran met in Austin with Messrs. Anderson, Johnson and Kleiman and presented orally the counter-proposal on price of $35.00 per share with a 30-day exclusivity and $32.00 per share with no exclusivity.

 

On October 8, 2010, Mr. Kleiman notified a representative of Morgan Stanley that Dell was not interested in pursuing discussions further with Compellent based on the parties’ differing price expectations.

 

From October 9, 2010 through October 20, 2010, discussions discontinued between the parties.

 

On October 21, 2010, a representative of Blackstone encountered Mr. Kleiman at a group dinner for corporate development executives and inquired whether there was still any interest on the part of Dell to continue discussions with Compellent.

 

Following that encounter, on October 25, 2010, Mr. Soran contacted Messrs. Anderson and Thomas to see if there was any reason for the parties to resume discussions. Messrs. Anderson and Thomas indicated that Dell was pursuing other storage alternatives and was not interested in purchasing Compellent at the price proposed by Compellent. Messrs. Anderson and Thomas indicated that if Compellent would consider a lower price Dell may be still interested in a potential acquisition, but they indicated that Compellent would need to move quickly to consummate a transaction as Dell was pursuing other alternatives and was well down the path of pursuing these alternatives.

On October 25, 2010, Compellent’s board of directors held a special meeting with representatives from Cooley, Morgan Stanley and Blackstone and members of management present to discuss the potential sale of Compellent to Dell at a lower price than the counter-proposal proposed by Compellent based on the feedback received from Dell. Following a discussion of Compellent’s strategic alternatives and an assessment of the potential value of the business, Compellent’s board of directors determined that it would be appropriate for the financial advisors and Mr. Soran to make a counter-proposal to Dell at $28.00 per share.

 

On October 27, 2010, representatives of Morgan Stanley and Blackstone presented an oral counter-proposal to Mr. Johnson and Mr. Kleiman at a price of $28.00 per share.

 

On November 2, 2010, Dell responded by sending a written, non-binding indication of interest to purchase Compellent at $26.00 per share structured as a two-step tender offer conditioned on Compellent agreeing to a 30-day exclusivity period with no standstill agreement from Dell to enable Dell to conduct its due diligence. The indication of interest contained a number of other key conditions that would be included in any definitive agreement between the parties, or the November 2nd Proposal, including: (i) inclusion of a standard covenant prohibiting solicitation of competing offers, or a “no shop” provision, a no talk provision subject to customary fiduciary exceptions, and a requirement to notify Dell of the receipt of third party acquisition proposals or inquiries, (ii) a provision requiring Dell’s consent (not to be unreasonably withheld) to any public communication by Compellent regarding the transaction, (iii) a termination fee in the amount of 4.75% of Compellent’s fully-diluted equity value based on the transaction price, (iv) a five-business-day period for “match” rights on competing offers and a five-business-day period for match rights on any material amendments to competing offers, (v) a provision requiring Compellent to adopt a stockholder rights plan that would carve-out the Dell acquisition from its operation, and (vi) a provision regarding execution of irrevocable tender and support agreements and option agreements by significant stockholders, or the Key Stockholders (which would include a provision requiring those stockholders to pay Dell 100% of any “profit” realizable by them in connection with any competing offer, or the Upside Option). In addition, Dell asked that a six-month reseller agreement be entered into by the parties on the date a definitive agreement was signed by the Dell and Compellent.

 

On November 2, 2010, representatives of Morgan Stanley and Blackstone had a further conversation with Mr. Kleiman to further clarify the terms and conditions of the November 2nd Proposal. Mr. Kleiman indicated that those terms and conditions were important to Dell and that Dell expected that any transaction would include those terms and conditions, subject to any limitations under applicable law.

 

On November 3, 2010, Compellent’s board of directors held a special meeting, with representatives from Cooley, Morgan Stanley and Blackstone and members of management present. Compellent’s financial advisors communicated to the board of directors that Dell was seeking a reasonable amount of certainty that the transaction with Compellent would close and Compellent’s advisors and management discussed the range of deal protections that Dell was seeking in the proposed transaction with Compellent. Compellent’s board of directors determined that it would be advisable to have the financial advisors attempt to further negotiate with Dell on the proposed price and the proposed Upside Option before engaging in discussions on other proposed key terms.

 

From November 3 through November 9, 2010, negotiations continued regarding the proposed price and the Upside Option. During that period, Compellent’s financial advisors communicated to Dell that Compellent was seeking a higher price than currently proposed by Dell, and that the proposed Upside Option was not workable for Key Stockholders also being requested to enter into tender and support agreements.

 

On November 10, 2010, Mr. Kleiman orally proposed $27.00 per share with respect to price, but indicated that the proposed Upside Option and other terms outlined in the November 2nd Proposal were key terms to Dell’s willingness to pursue a potential acquisition of Compellent.

 

On November 11, 2010, Compellent’s board of directors held a regular meeting, with representatives from Cooley, Morgan Stanley and Blackstone and members of management present. In the meeting, the financial advisors discussed with the board of directors the potential transaction and the terms proposed by Dell. Cooley discussed the board of directors’ fiduciary duties in light of the proposal presented by Dell. Compellent’s financial advisors also indicated that they had informed Dell that any definitive agreement would have to offer deal certainty

to Compellent and its stockholders in light of the key terms regarding deal protections that Dell was seeking for the benefit of Dell. The board of directors asked Mr. Soran and the financial advisors to meet again with representatives of Dell in person to discuss the price and the Upside Option requirement.

 

On November 12, 2010, representatives from Cooley, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, or Potter Anderson, Delaware counsel for Compellent, Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP, or Dewey, outside legal counsel to Dell, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Delaware counsel for Dell, and representatives from Dell’s in-house legal department attended a conference call where counsel for both parties discussed the November 2nd Proposal.

 

On November 14, 2010, Mr. Soran, representatives of Compellent’s financial advisors, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Kleiman met in Chicago to discuss the November 2nd Proposal, including the Upside Option proposed by Dell and potential alternatives to this term. During the meeting, representatives of Compellent reiterated that the proposed Upside Option was not workable for the Key Stockholders and proposed entering into a long-term, arm’s-length original equipment manufacturing agreement with commercially reasonable terms, or the OEM Agreement, in lieu of the Upside Option and the proposed reseller agreement.

 

On November 15, 2010, Compellent’s board of directors held a special meeting, with representatives from Cooley, Potter Anderson, Morgan Stanley and Blackstone and members of management present. Mr. Soran and the financial advisors relayed the results of the meeting the day before with Mr. Johnson and Mr. Kleiman. Compellent’s board of directors considered the terms and conditions of a potential counter-proposal to Dell. Compellent’s board of directors discussed that an arm’s-length OEM Agreement with commercially reasonable terms effective upon signing of a definitive agreement with Dell might be acceptable. Compellent’s counsel discussed the board’s fiduciary duties in connection with the Dell proposal and potential Company counter-proposal to Dell. Following a discussion, the board of directors indicated that it would support Compellent submitting a counter-proposal to Dell as follows: a price of $27.50 per share, and an exclusivity period of 30 days with no standstill, and on this basis, allow Dell to conduct due diligence and negotiate a definitive agreement for the potential acquisition. In addition, Compellent would agree to the following terms requested by Dell: (i) a termination fee in the amount of 3.5% of Compellent’s fully-diluted equity value, (ii) tender and support agreements from Key Stockholders that would not survive the termination of the merger agreement, (iii) no Upside Option by the Key Stockholders, (iv) a three-business-day period for “match” rights on competing offers and a two-business-day period for match rights on any material amendments to competing offers and (v) adoption of the stockholder rights plan. Compellent would also offer to negotiate a seven-year OEM Agreement on arm’s-length terms.

 

On November 15, 2010, Compellent submitted to Dell a revised non-binding indication of interest and a revised exclusivity agreement consistent with the terms approved by Compellent board of directors as described above, or the November 15th Counterproposal, and also requested that a new confidentiality agreement be put into place between the two companies to replace the one previously signed in April 2004 in connection with a potential commercial arrangement.

 

On November 15, 2010, Dewey, on behalf of Dell, submitted a revised non-binding indication of interest and proposed exclusivity agreement to Cooley, on behalf of Compellent, or the November 15th Proposal, which was identical to November 2nd Proposal, except that the proposed price of $27.50 per share was bracketed and such proposal contained the following different terms: (i) a termination fee in the amount of 4.5% of Compellent’s fully-diluted equity value, (ii) tender and support agreements from certain Key Stockholders that would survive for a period of nine months, or the “tail provision,” following the termination of the merger agreement with Dell, to vote against (and not to tender into or otherwise support or facilitate) another acquisition proposal, and (iii) a four-business-day period for “match” rights on competing offers and a three-business-day period for match rights on any material amendments to competing offers.

 

On November 17, 2010, Dell provided Compellent, its financial advisors and Cooley a draft term sheet for the proposed OEM Agreement.

 

On November 18, 2010, representatives from Compellent, Cooley, Dell and Dewey met in Chicago to discuss the terms and conditions of the proposed OEM Agreement. Later that same day, the parties discussed the other terms and conditions of a potential transaction. During the meeting, Mr. Soran indicated that the Key Stockholders could potentially agree to a three month tail provision on the tender and support agreements. Representatives from Dell

indicated that the tail provision was an important deal term to Dell and that they would be seeking at least a six month tail provision during which time the Key Stockholders would not be able to support another change of control transaction after the termination of the merger agreement with Dell. The parties reached an impasse on some of the terms, including Dell’s request for a tail provision on the tender and support agreements from the Key Stockholders.

 

On the evening of November 18, 2010, Mr. Kleiman contacted Mr. Soran and asked if their respective Delaware counsels could discuss the proposed tail provision in the context of the potential transaction and other proposed terms.

 

On November 19, 2010, Mr. Soran contacted Mr. Kleiman and agreed that each party’s respective Delaware counsel further discuss the proposed tail provision. Later that same day, the parties’ counsel discussed the proposed tail provision on the proposed tender and support agreements.

 

On November 19, 2010, Mr. Soran called a special meeting of the board of directors to discuss the state of the negotiations with Dell. Representatives from Cooley, Morgan Stanley and Blackstone and members of management were also present. Mr. Soran indicated that he believed that the parties had reached an impasse given the firm stance that Dell was taking with respect to certain terms, including the tail provision on the proposed tender and support agreements requested by Dell. Later that same day, Mr. Kleiman contacted a representative of Morgan Stanley and proposed the following key terms: (i) a termination fee in the amount of 4.0% of Compellent’s fully-diluted equity value, (ii) tender and support agreements from Key Stockholders with a tail period of six months and (iii) a four-business-day period for match rights on competing offers and a three-business-day period for match rights on amendments to such offers.

 

On November 23, 2010, Mr. Soran and Compellent’s financial advisors were informed by Messrs. Johnson and Kleiman that, in light of the disagreement between the parties as to the circumstances under which the proposed OEM Agreement would be terminable, Dell no longer considered the proposed OEM Agreement to be a viable option. The representatives from Dell also advised Compellent that Dell would again be seeking the Upside Option from Key Stockholders as a condition to the potential transaction.

 

On November 23, 2010, after Mr. Soran and Cooley had consulted with the Key Stockholders being asked to sign the Upside Option, Compellent and Dell engaged in negotiations regarding the proposed Upside Option. Later that same day, Mr. Soran and Compellent’s financial advisors had a conversation with Messrs. Johnson and Kleiman in which the representatives from Dell proposed a cash merger with a “force the vote” provision, in lieu of the two-step cash tender offer contemplated in the prior discussions and Upside Option from the Key Stockholders, with voting and support agreements that would survive the termination of the merger agreement with Dell for a period of nine months.

 

On November 23, 2010, representatives from Cooley, Dewey as well as representatives from Dell in-house legal finalized negotiations of the exclusivity agreement, with the non-binding outline of deal protection terms.

 

On November 24, 2010, Dell proposed an exclusivity agreement, based on a non-binding indication of interest with the following terms: a price of $27.50 per share that would be structured as a one-step cash merger conditioned on a 30-day exclusivity period and a number of other key conditions that would be included in any definitive agreement between the parties, including: (i) inclusion of a “no shop” provision, a no talk provision subject to customary fiduciary exceptions and a requirement to notify Dell regarding third party acquisition proposals or inquiries, (ii) a provision requiring Dell’s consent (not to be unreasonably withheld) to any public communication by Compellent regarding the transaction, except as required by law or legal process, (iii) a termination fee in the amount of 4.0% of Compellent’s fully-diluted equity value based on the transaction price, (iv) a provision confirming that a breach of the no-shop/no-talk provision would be a “triggering event” for purposes of the 4.0% termination fee referred to in (iii) above, (v) a provision requiring Compellent to submit the transaction to a vote of its stockholders even if Compellent’s board of directors had changed its recommendation and no longer recommended voting in favor of the Merger, (vi) a match right with respect to any proposed change in recommendation by Compellent’s board of directors in connection with any superior offer, exercisable by Dell for a period of four business days (and three business days in the case of any material amendment to a superior offer), (vii) a provision requiring Compellent to adopt a stockholder rights plan, (viii) a provision regarding execution of voting and support agreements by Key Stockholders pursuant to which they would agree: (a) to vote their shares in favor of, and

otherwise to support, the contemplated transaction; and (b) for a period of nine months following the termination of the acquisition agreement with Dell (but only under circumstances in which a termination fee is or could become payable), to vote against (and not to tender into or otherwise support or facilitate) another acquisition proposal (it being understood that such agreements would not contain any “option” or other profit sharing component). The non-binding indication of interest also stipulated that the parties would enter into a short-term reseller agreement with arms-length, commercially reasonable terms that would be effective upon the signing of the merger agreement.

 

On the afternoon of November 24, 2010, Compellent’s board of directors held a special meeting to discuss the proposed terms of an exclusivity letter with a non-binding indication of interest and confidentiality agreement. Representatives from Cooley, Morgan Stanley and Blackstone and members of management were also present. Compellent’s board of directors approved entering into a 30-day exclusivity agreement, with a non-binding indication of interest, and a confidentiality agreement.

 

On the evening of November 24, 2010, the parties entered into an exclusivity agreement and new confidentiality agreement.

 

On November 26, 2010, the parties and their financial and legal representatives held a joint call to discuss timing and logistics regarding the due diligence process for the proposed transaction.

 

From November 30, 2010 through December 10, 2010, the parties held due diligence meetings in Minnesota. As part of the due diligence process, Compellent provided to Dell certain financial forecasts of Compellent’s future financial performance as a standalone public company that had been prepared in September 2010, as part of Compellent’s review of its strategic alternatives.

 

In the early morning of December 5, 2010, Dewey sent an initial draft of the merger agreement to Cooley.

 

On December 7, 2010, Mr. Soran called a special meeting of the board of directors. Representatives from Cooley, Morgan Stanley and Blackstone and members of management were present. The board of directors discussed the recent increase in the trading price of Compellent’s stock, which it noted was now trading above $33.00 per share having traded at levels nearer to $27.00 per share over the previous week. This increase in trading price was ascribed to recent analyst reports and speculation that Compellent may be in merger talks after Compellent had cancelled its attendance at a Barclay’s analyst conference. The board of directors also discussed the draft merger agreement received from Dell.

 

In the afternoon of December 8, 2010, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Kleiman informed Mr. Soran and Compellent’s financial advisors that, in light of the recent run up in the trading price of Compellent’s stock as a result of speculation in the marketplace that Compellent was in talks to be acquired and in anticipation of Dell’s upcoming media day and Mr. Anderson’s scheduled presentation at the Barclay’s analyst conference, Dell wanted to issue a press release or a joint press release with Compellent before the stock market opened on the morning of December 9 to announce that the parties had entered into an exclusivity agreement and were in talks for Dell to acquire Compellent at $27.50 per share.

 

On the afternoon of December 8, 2010, Mr. Soran called a special meeting of the board of directors to discuss the press release contemplated by Dell. Representatives from Cooley, Morgan Stanley and Blackstone and members of management were present. The advisors discussed with the board of directors their views of the risks relating to the proposed press release. The board of directors weighed the risk of pre-announcing a deal with Dell before the parties had agreed to all the material terms relative to the transaction and the risk of Dell potentially walking away from the potential merger with Compellent, as a result of the recent run up in the trading price of Compellent’s stock. The board of directors instructed Mr. Soran, and representatives of the financial and legal advisors, to try to make progress on the terms and conditions of the proposed merger agreement that would create a reasonable amount of certainty for Compellent that the deal would close before the board of directors made a decision on the response to Dell’s request.

 

In the evening of December 8, 2010, Cooley delivered a revised draft of the merger agreement to Dewey.

 

Following the board meeting, representatives of Compellent’s financial advisors contacted Mr. Kleiman and indicated that Compellent’s board of directors was weighing its options in light of Dell’s proposed press release. They further indicated that if significant progress could be made on the terms of the merger agreement to provide

Compellent and its stockholders with greater certainty that a transaction would be closed, including tighter closing conditions than were reflected in Dell’s initial draft of the merger agreement, such movement would aid Compellent’s board of directors in its decision-making process.

 

On the evening of December 8, 2010 through the early morning of December 9, 2010, Compellent’s special board meeting reconvened, with financial and legal advisors present, to discuss the risks inherent in the proposed press release and Compellent’s options. The financial advisors reported that during the meeting, representatives of Dell called and had informed them that Dell was prepared to agree to provide for substantially greater deal certainty than reflected in the original draft merger agreement submitted by Dell. Compellent’s board of directors agreed to adjourn the meeting so the legal advisors could hold negotiations on the merger agreement and agreed to reconvene the board meeting before the stock market opened to make a decision on the press release.

 

In the early morning of December 9, 2010, representatives of Cooley, Dewey and Dell’s in-house legal department negotiated the terms of the merger agreement and the contents of a proposed joint press release to announce that the parties were in exclusive talks regarding a potential acquisition of Compellent by Dell at $27.50 per share.

 

On December 9, 2010, the board of directors reconvened its earlier meeting. The representatives from Cooley reported on the progress made on the merger agreement negotiations. The board of directors determined that pursuing the proposed transaction with Dell was still in the best interest of Compellent’s stockholders, and, in light of the progress made on the merger agreement, including the status of terms relating to closing conditions, the board of directors authorized a joint press release with Dell to announce the ongoing merger discussions between the parties.

 

On December 9, 2010, the parties jointly issued a press release announcing that the parties were in exclusive talks regarding the potential acquisition of Compellent by Dell at $27.50 per share.

 

From December 9, 2010 through December 12, 2010, the parties and their counsel negotiated the merger agreement, the voting and support agreements and the related disclosure schedules, and the executives of Compellent negotiated their employment arrangements with Dell. During this period, following the public announcement of the merger, Compellent did not receive any expressions of interest from third parties wishing to pursue any potential strategic transaction with them.

 

On December 11, 2010, a representative of the financial advisors asked Messrs. Johnson and Kleiman to increase the per share merger consideration in light of the significant progress that had been made to sign the merger agreement on an expedited timeframe.

 

On December 12, 2010, the board of directors met to discuss the proposed merger agreement, reseller agreement and stockholder rights plan. Representatives from Cooley, Morgan Stanley and Blackstone and members of management were present. Representatives of Cooley discussed the board’s fiduciary duties in connection with the proposed transaction with Dell; reviewed in detail the key terms of the draft merger agreement and voting and support agreements; reviewed the terms of the reseller agreement to be executed concurrently with the execution of the merger agreement; and reviewed the terms of the rights plan. Representatives of the financial advisors informed the board that Dell was considering their request to increase the per share merger consideration in light of the significant progress that had been made to sign the merger agreement on an expedited timeframe.

 

Also at this meeting, representatives of Morgan Stanley provided an overview of the process, including the fact that no other potential acquirer had contacted Compellent or any of its advisors since the December 9 press release indicating that it seemed unlikely that there would be another bidder. Representatives of Morgan Stanley reviewed with Compellent’s board of directors its financial analysis of the merger consideration and rendered its oral opinion, which was subsequently confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated December 12, 2010, that, as of that date, and based upon and subject to the various assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the scope of review undertaken as set forth in such opinion, the $27.50 per share expected to be received by the holders of Compellent’s common stock at the time the opinion was rendered was fair from a financial point of view, to holders of Compellent’s common stock. Representatives of Blackstone then reviewed with Compellent’s board of directors its financial analysis of the merger consideration and rendered its oral opinion, which was confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated December 12, 2010, that, as of that date and based upon and subject to the various

assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the scope of review undertaken as set forth in such opinion, the $27.50 per share expected to be received by the holders of Compellent’s common stock at the time the opinion was rendered was fair to such holders from a financial point of view.

 

Following discussion, the board of directors unanimously (i) determined that the merger with an affiliate of Dell was advisable and fair to and in the best interests of Compellent and its stockholders; (ii) approved and adopted the merger agreement and approved the merger and the other contemplated transactions thereunder including, but not limited to, the reseller agreement and the voting and support agreements; (iii) approved the stockholder rights plan and adopted other resolutions to implement the stockholder rights plan, (iv) subject to the right of Compellent’s board of directors to withdraw or modify its recommendation in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement, recommended the adoption of the merger agreement by Compellent’s stockholders and directed that the merger agreement and the merger with an affiliate of Dell be submitted for consideration by Compellent’s stockholders at a special meeting of stockholders; and (v) took other actions required under the merger agreement or necessary to implement the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

 

On December 12, 2010, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Kleiman informed a representative of Blackstone that Dell was willing to increase the price to $27.75 per share and Mr. Soran informed the members of the board of directors. Dell and Compellent continued final negotiations of the merger agreement and voting and support agreements through the evening of December 12, 2010.

 

On December 12, 2010, the parties executed final versions of the merger agreement, voting and support agreements and reseller agreement.

 

On December 13, 2010, Compellent and Dell issued a joint press release announcing the transaction prior to the opening of trading on the NYSE.

 

Reasons for the Merger of Compellent and Recommendation of the Board of Directors

 

On December 12, 2010, our board of directors unanimously, (i) determined that the Merger is advisable and fair to and in the best interests of Compellent and its stockholders; (ii) approved and adopted the Merger Agreement and approved the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, and (iii) subject to the right of our board of directors to withdraw or modify its recommendation in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, recommended the adoption of the Merger Agreement by our stockholders and directed that the Merger Agreement and the Merger be submitted for consideration by our stockholders at the Special Meeting.

 

Our board of directors considered the following factors in reaching its conclusion to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and to recommend that our stockholders adopt the Merger Agreement, all of which it viewed as generally supporting its decision to approve the business combination with Parent (which are not listed in any relative order or importance):

 

 

 

 

Our board of directors also considered the potential risks of the Merger and other potentially negative factors, including the following:

 

 

 

The board of directors concluded that the risks, uncertainties, restrictions and potentially negative factors associated with the Merger are outweighed by the potential benefits of the Merger.

 

The foregoing discussion of the board of directors’ reasons for its recommendation to adopt the Merger Agreement is not meant to be exhaustive, but addresses the material information and factors considered by the board of directors in consideration of its recommendation. In view of the wide variety of factors considered by the board of directors in connection with the evaluation of the Merger and the complexity of these matters, the board of directors did not find it practicable to, and did not, quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors considered in reaching its determination and recommendation. Rather, the directors made their determinations and recommendations based on the totality of the information presented to them, and the judgments of individual members of the board of directors may have been influenced to a greater or lesser degree by different factors. In arriving at their respective recommendations, the members of the board of directors were aware of the interests of executive officers and directors of Compellent as described under “The Merger — Interests of Our Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger.”

 

Our board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the adoption of the Merger Agreement.

 

Unaudited Financial Forecasts

 

As part of its review of strategic alternatives, in September 2010, Compellent prepared financial forecasts of its future financial performance as a standalone public company. Compellent provided these forecasts to Morgan Stanley and Blackstone for their financial analyses and to Dell. The forecasts assume that Compellent sustains high

revenue growth (although at declining rate of growth year over year) and is able to achieve margin improvement while increasing revenue. These forecasts, particularly the revenue forecasts, are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties that could cause the actual results to differ materially from the forecasted results. Such risks and uncertainties could adversely affect Compellent’s future revenue, margins and operating results, including risks that Compellent’s operating results may fluctuate significantly, that Compellent has a history of losses and may not sustain profitability in the future, unfavorable economic and market conditions may lessen demand in the information technology market as well as the other risks identified in the “Risk Factors” contained in Compellent’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and Compellent’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010. All forecasts are forward-looking statements, and these and other forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by the risks and uncertainties identified in Compellent’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and Compellent’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010.

 

The non-GAAP “unlevered free cash flow” forecasts provided to Compellent’s financial advisors and to Dell included the following forecasts of Compellent’s future financial performance:

 

 

 

 

The forecasts estimate unlevered free cash flows (calculated as operating income plus the non-cash expenses for stock compensation and depreciation and amortization, less taxes on adjusted operating income assuming a tax rate of 35%, less capital expenditures plus the change in deferred revenue), resulting in a cash and investments balance of $441 million in 2015.

 

The financial forecasts for Compellent summarized above were not prepared expressly for inclusion or incorporation by reference in this proxy statement.

 

Compellent does not as a matter of course make public any forecasts as to future performance or earnings, other than limited guidance regarding anticipated quarterly revenue, non-GAAP earnings per share, stock based compensation costs, quarterly taxes, and its effective tax rate. The summary of the forecasts with respect to Compellent’s future financial performance set forth above is included in this proxy statement only because the forecasts with respect to Compellent’s future financial performance was provided to Morgan Stanley, Blackstone and Dell. The forecasts were not prepared with a view to public disclosure or compliance with the published guidelines of the SEC or the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants regarding estimates, projections or forecasts. The forecasts do not purport to present operations in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. Compellent’s independent registered public accounting firm has not examined, compiled or otherwise applied procedures, and Compellent’s independent registered public accounting firm has not examined, compiled or otherwise applied procedures to the forecasts and accordingly assumes no responsibility for them. Compellent’s internal financial forecasts are, in general, prepared solely for internal use, such as budgeting and other management decisions, and are subjective in many respects. The forecasts reflect numerous assumptions made by the management of Compellent at the time they were prepared, and general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the Compellent’s control. Accordingly, there can be no assurance

that the assumptions made in preparing the forecasts will prove accurate or that actual results will not be significantly higher or lower than the forecasts.

 

The inclusion of the forecasts herein should not be regarded as an indication that any of Compellent, Parent, Dell or their respective affiliates or representatives considered or consider the forecasts to be a prediction of actual future events, and the forecasts should not be relied upon as such. None of Compellent, Parent, Dell or any of their respective affiliates or representatives intends to update or otherwise revise the forecasts to reflect circumstances existing or arising after the date such forecasts were generated or to reflect the occurrence of future events.

 

Compellent’s stockholders are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forecasts included in this proxy statement.

 

Opinions of Compellent’s Advisors

 

Opinion of Morgan Stanley

 

Morgan Stanley was retained by Compellent to provide it with financial advisory services and a financial opinion in connection with a possible merger, sale or other strategic business combination. Compellent selected Morgan Stanley to act as its financial advisor based on Morgan Stanley’s qualifications, expertise and reputation and its knowledge of the business and affairs of Compellent.

 

At the meeting of Compellent’s board of directors on December 12, 2010, Morgan Stanley rendered its oral opinion, which was subsequently confirmed in writing, that, as of that date, and based upon and subject to the various assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the scope of review undertaken by Morgan Stanley, as set forth in its opinion, the consideration to be received by the holders of shares of Compellent common stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement was fair from a financial point of view to such holders. At the time of such oral opinion, the consideration to be received by holders of Compellent common stock was expected to be $27.50 per share. Morgan Stanley’s opinion was approved by a committee of Morgan Stanley’s investment banking and other professionals in accordance with Morgan Stanley’s customary practice. The full text of the written opinion of Morgan Stanley dated December 12, 2010 is attached to this proxy statement as Annex C and is incorporated herein by reference. Subsequent to Morgan Stanley making a presentation to Compellent’s board of directors and rendering its oral opinion on December 12, 2010, the Merger consideration was increased by $0.25 per share. Morgan Stanley confirmed in writing the oral opinion that had been previously rendered on December 12, 2010. Morgan Stanley was not requested by Compellent’s board of directors to update the prior opinion that had been rendered to the board. Accordingly, the text of the written opinion attached as Annex C reflects the consideration of $27.50 per share that was expected to be paid as of December 12, 2010 rather than the $27.75 per share that was subsequently agreed to and set forth in the Merger Agreement. You should read the opinion carefully and in its entirety. Morgan Stanley’s opinion is directed to Compellent’s board of directors and addresses only the fairness from a financial point of view of the consideration to be received by holders of Compellent common stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement as of the date of the opinion. It does not address any other aspects of the Merger and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder of Compellent as to how such stockholder should vote with respect to any matter or whether to take any other action with respect to the proposed transaction. The summary of Morgan Stanley’s opinion set forth in this proxy statement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion.

 

In arriving at its opinion, Morgan Stanley, among other things:

 

 

 

In arriving at its opinion, Morgan Stanley assumed and relied upon, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of the information that was publicly available or supplied or otherwise made available to Morgan Stanley by Compellent, and formed a substantial basis for its opinion. With respect to the financial projections, Morgan Stanley assumed that they had been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the management of Compellent of the future financial performance of Compellent. In addition, Morgan Stanley assumed that the Merger will be consummated in accordance with the terms set forth in the draft of the Merger Agreement reviewed by it, without any waiver, amendment or delay of any terms or conditions. Morgan Stanley assumed that in connection with the receipt of all the necessary governmental, regulatory or other approvals and consents required for the proposed Merger, no delays, limitations, conditions or restrictions will be imposed that would have a material adverse effect on the contemplated benefits expected to be derived in the proposed Merger. Morgan Stanley is not a legal, tax, or regulatory advisor. Morgan Stanley is a financial advisor only and relied upon, without independent verification, the assessment of Compellent and its legal, tax, or regulatory advisors with respect to legal, tax, or regulatory matters. Morgan Stanley expressed no opinion with respect to the fairness of the amount or nature of the compensation to any of Compellent’s officers, directors or employees, or any class of such persons, relative to the consideration to be received by the holders of shares of Compellent common stock in the transaction. Morgan Stanley did not make any independent valuation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities of Compellent, nor was Morgan Stanley furnished with any such appraisals. Morgan Stanley’s opinion was necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to Morgan Stanley as of, December 12, 2010. Events occurring after December 12, 2010 may affect Morgan Stanley’s opinion and the assumptions used in preparing it, and Morgan Stanley did not assume any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion.

 

The following is a brief summary of the material financial analyses performed by Morgan Stanley in connection with its oral opinion and the preparation of its written opinion letter dated December 12, 2010 to Compellent’s board of directors. Some of the financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand the financial analyses used by Morgan Stanley, the tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. The analyses listed in the tables and described below must be considered as a whole; considering any portion of such analyses and of the factors considered, without considering all analyses and factors, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying Morgan Stanley’s fairness opinion.

 

Compellent Historical Trading Range and Premiums Review

 

Morgan Stanley reviewed the historical trading range of Compellent common stock for various periods ending December 10, 2010. The range of low to high closing prices for Compellent stock over the last 52 weeks of trading before December 10, 2010, rounded to the nearest dollar, was $11.00 to $34.00 per share. Morgan Stanley also

observed the premium implied by a transaction at $27.50 per Compellent share to various historical trading prices for Compellent shares, as follows:

 

 

Morgan Stanley also noted that the price prior to the first day of the speculative rumors about a possible acquisition of Compellent, September 1, 2010, was $15.01.

 

Compellent Equity Research Price Target Analysis

 

Morgan Stanley reviewed the price targets for the Compellent common stock prepared and published by equity research analysts and available to the public as of December 12, 2010. These targets reflect each analyst’s estimate of the future public market-trading price of Compellent’s common stock and are not discounted to reflect present value. Morgan Stanley noted that the range of undiscounted price targets for Compellent common stock as of December 10, 2010 was $22.50 to $40.00.

 

In order to better compare the published price targets with the consideration to be received by the holders of Compellent common stock, Morgan Stanley discounted the published price targets by an assumed cost of equity of 11.0% for an illustrative one-year period. On a discounted basis, rounded to the nearest dollar, the range of price targets for the Compellent common stock as of December 10, 2010 was $20.00 to $36.00.

 

This cost of equity was estimated using a capital asset pricing model and considering certain financial metrics, including betas, for Compellent and certain comparable companies which exhibited similar business characteristics to Compellent, as well as certain financial metrics for the United States equity markets generally.

 

The public market trading price targets published by equity research analysts do not necessarily reflect current market trading prices for Compellent common stock and these estimates are subject to uncertainties, including the future financial performance of Compellent and future financial market conditions.

 

Compellent Trading Valuation Analysis

 

Morgan Stanley performed a trading valuation analysis, which is designed to estimate an implied value of a company by reviewing its trading valuations and trading valuations of similar companies that are publicly traded. Morgan Stanley reviewed and compared certain current and historical financial information for Compellent with certain publicly available financial information, ratios and public market multiples for other publicly traded companies that share similar business characteristics with Compellent. There are no publicly traded comparable companies which are identical to Compellent due to the complexity and variation of Compellent’s business. In evaluating the selected comparable companies and trading history of Compellent and selecting representative ranges of revenue multiples, Morgan Stanley made judgments and assumptions with regard to industry performance, general business, market and financial conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of Compellent, such as the impact of competition on the business of Compellent or the industry generally, industry growth and the absence of any adverse material change in the financial condition and prospects of Compellent or the industry or in the financial markets in general. Simple mathematical analysis (such as applying mean or median multiples) is not in itself a meaningful method of using comparable company data. The following list sets forth the selected comparable companies that were reviewed in this analysis:

 

 

 

Based on publicly available consensus equity research analyst estimates, Morgan Stanley analyzed the following statistics of each of these companies for comparative purposes:

 

 

 

In addition to the foregoing information, Morgan Stanley analyzed Compellent’s valuation since its initial public offering, or IPO, as a multiple of AV to next twelve month, or NTM, revenue. Based on revenue estimates included in publicly available consensus equity research analyst estimates of Compellent’s future performance available as of December 12, 2010 from Institutional Brokers’ Estimate System, which we refer to as the IBES Street Case, Morgan Stanley determined the mean of the AV/NTM revenue multiples from Compellent’s IPO to the day prior to Dell’s initial offer to acquire 3PAR (August 13, 2010) of 2.6x and the mean of the AV/NTM revenue multiples from Compellent’s IPO to the trading day prior to announcement of the Merger (December 10, 2010) of 2.8x. Morgan Stanley determined to utilize revenue multiples for this analysis based on its professional judgment and because it is a method that has been frequently employed by equity research analysts to value Compellent and similar companies. Based on the foregoing and applying its professional judgment, Morgan Stanley selected a representative range of AV to revenue multiples deemed most meaningful for this analysis and applied this range of multiples to 2011 forecasted Compellent revenue included in the financial forecasts provided by management of Compellent, which we refer to as the Management Case (See “The Merger — Unaudited Financial Forecasts” above). In addition to the Management Case, for illustrative purposes, Morgan Stanley also applied this range of multiples to revenue estimates included in the IBES Street Case.

 

Based on these calculations, this analysis implied a range of per share values for Compellent common stock as shown on the table below:

 

 

Discounted Equity Value Analysis

 

Morgan Stanley performed a discounted equity value analysis, which is designed to provide insight into the potential future price of a company’s common equity as a function of the company’s estimated future earnings per share, or EPS, and a potential range of price to earnings, or P/E, ratios. The resulting value is subsequently discounted to arrive at an estimate of the present value for the company’s potential future stock price.

 

Morgan Stanley calculated ranges of implied future equity values per share for Compellent by applying a range of P/E multiples to estimated EPS for Compellent for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Morgan Stanley considered the projected revenue growth rate from 2014 to 2015 for each of the

Management Case and the IBES Street Case and the relationship between long-term growth rates and P/E multiples for growth companies and selected these multiples based on the application of its professional judgment. Morgan Stanley performed this calculation using the Management Case forecasts, and, for illustrative purposes, the IBES Street Case estimates. The 2014 IBES Street Case estimate was based on extrapolations of the IBES Street Case estimates discussed below under “Discounted Cash Flow Analysis”. Morgan Stanley then discounted the equity values to December 10, 2010 using a discount rate of 11.0% to calculate a range of implied aggregate values for Compellent. The discount rate was determined based on an analysis of the weighted average cost of capital of Compellent.

 

Based on these calculations, this analysis implied a range of per share values for Compellent common stock as shown on the table below:

 

 

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

 

Morgan Stanley performed a discounted cash flow analysis, which is designed to estimate an implied value of a company by calculating the present value of the estimated future cash flows and terminal value of the company. Morgan Stanley calculated a range of implied equity values per share of Compellent common stock based on Management Case forecasts of future cash flows for fiscal years 2010 through 2015. Morgan Stanley first calculated the Management Case estimated unlevered free cash flows (calculated as adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, less taxes on adjusted operating income, less the amount of any increase or plus the amount of any decrease in net working capital, less capital expenditures and less stock based compensation costs) of Compellent for fiscal years 2010 to 2015, using tax rates estimated by Compellent management. Morgan Stanley then calculated a terminal value for Compellent by applying a range of perpetual growth rates to the unlevered free cash flow after 2015 ranging from 4.0% to 6.0%. Morgan Stanley considered the projected revenue growth rate from 2014 to 2015 for each of the Management Case and the IBES Street Case and selected these perpetuity growth rates based on the application of its professional judgment. These values were then discounted to present values as of December 10, 2010 using an 11% discount rate to calculate an aggregate value for Compellent. This aggregate value was further adjusted for Compellent’s total debt, minority interest, cash and cash equivalents, to calculate a range of implied equity value per share. Based on these calculations, this analysis implied a value range for Compellent common stock as shown in the table below:

 

 

For illustrative purposes, Morgan Stanley also calculated a range of implied equity values per share of Compellent common stock based on IBES Street Case estimates of future cash flows for fiscal years 2010 through 2015. In preparing its analysis, Morgan Stanley extrapolated the estimates for 2013 through 2015 for the IBES Street Case estimates from the last year of estimates contained therein. These extrapolations were prepared solely for the purpose of performing Morgan Stanley’s illustrative analyses utilizing the IBES Street Case estimates and not with a view toward public disclosure. The extrapolated estimates were based on variables and assumptions that are inherently uncertain and may be beyond the control of Compellent and, accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those contained in the extrapolations. Morgan Stanley calculated the IBES Street Case estimated unlevered free cash flows of Compellent for the period from December 10, 2010 to December 31, 2015, assuming a normalized tax rate of 35.0%. Morgan Stanley then calculated a terminal value for Compellent by applying a range of perpetual growth rates to the unlevered free cash flow after 2015 ranging from 4.0% to 6.0%. These values were then discounted to present values as of December 10, 2010 using an 11% discount rate to calculate an aggregate

value for Compellent. This aggregate value was further adjusted for Compellent’s total debt, minority interest, cash and cash equivalents, to calculate a range of implied equity value per share. Based on these calculations, this analysis implied a value range for Compellent common stock as shown in the table below:

 

 

Illustrative Premium to “Unaffected” Share Price Analysis

 

Morgan Stanley performed an illustrative analysis to determine an unaffected share price for Compellent and an implied transaction value for Compellent based on premia paid in selected transactions. Morgan Stanley analyzed precedent comparable transaction premiums to estimate a range of premiums that could be applied to Compellent’s unaffected share price. Following Dell’s announcement of its initial offer to acquire 3PAR on August 16, 2010, and the subsequent sale of 3PAR to Hewlett Packard, acquisition speculation and rumors were prevalent among data storage companies, including Compellent, resulting in an increase in market valuations. In order to approximate a Compellent share price not influenced by market acquisition speculation, or a share price that could be termed as “unaffected” and not outside of Compellent’s normalized trading range, Morgan Stanley analyzed Compellent’s valuation since its IPO as a multiple of AV to NTM revenue. Morgan Stanley determined the mean of the AV/NTM revenue multiples from Compellent’s IPO to the trading day prior to Dell’s initial offer to acquire 3PAR (August 13, 2010) and the mean of the AV/NTM revenue multiples from Compellent’s IPO to the trading day prior to announcement of Dell’s acquisition of Compellent. Morgan Stanley applied these mean multiples to Compellent’s estimated NTM Revenue as of December 10, 2010, using the IBES Street Case estimates, and adjusted for current debt, cash and equivalents, and fully diluted shares outstanding to estimate an “unaffected” share price. Based on these analyses and applying its professional judgment, Morgan Stanley estimated the unaffected share price as $19.00. Morgan Stanley noted that establishing an unaffected stock price under these circumstances is challenging and that this calculation was performed for illustrative purposes and did not suggest that absent acquisition speculation and rumors, Compellent stock could be expected to trade at or around this value. Morgan Stanley determined a range of premia from the premia implied in a large number of recent all-cash transactions of greater than $500 million in the technology sector of 25% to 45%. Morgan Stanley then applied this range of premiums to the illustrative unaffected Compellent share price of $19.00 to derive an implied share price range for Compellent of $24.00 — $28.00.

 

Precedent Transaction Multiples Analysis

 

Morgan Stanley performed a precedent transaction multiples analysis, which is designed to imply a value for a company based on publicly available financial terms of selected transactions that share some characteristics with the Merger. Morgan Stanley reviewed and compared the proposed financial terms offered for Compellent to corresponding publicly available financial terms in selected comparable acquisitions and announced offers to

acquire which have occurred from April 2006 through November of 2010. The following is a list of the transactions reviewed:

 

 

For each transaction listed above, using publicly available analyst estimates, Morgan Stanley noted the ratio of aggregate value of the transaction to NTM estimated revenue. From this analysis Morgan Stanley derived the range of multiples for the selected comparable transactions as set forth in the following table:

 

 

In reviewing this analysis, Morgan Stanley also considered, among other things, the relative comparability of the precedent transactions and targets to the Merger and Compellent. Based on the foregoing and applying its professional judgment, Morgan Stanley selected a reference range of aggregate value to NTM estimated revenue deemed most meaningful for this analysis. No company or transaction utilized in the comparable acquisitions analysis is identical to Compellent or the Merger. In evaluating the comparable acquisitions, Morgan Stanley made judgments and assumptions with regard to industry performance, general business, market and financial conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of Compellent, such as the impact of competition on the business of Compellent or the industry generally, industry growth and the absence of any adverse material change in the financial condition and prospects of Compellent or the industry or in the financial markets in general. Simple

mathematical analysis (such as applying mean or median multiples) is not in itself a meaningful method of using comparable company data. Morgan Stanley determined to utilize revenue multiples for this analysis based on its professional judgment and because it is the primary method employed by equity research analysts to value Compellent and similar companies. Morgan Stanley applied Compellent’s forecasted NTM revenue based on the Management Case to this reference range of multiples to determine a range of implied values for Compellent. For illustrative purposes, Morgan Stanley also performed this analysis using the IBES Street Case estimated NTM revenue for Compellent. The following table summarizes the results of this analysis:

 

 

General

 

In connection with the review of the Merger by the Compellent board of directors, Morgan Stanley performed a variety of financial and comparative analyses for purposes of rendering its opinion. The preparation of a financial opinion is a complex process and is not necessarily susceptible to a partial analysis or summary description. In arriving at its opinion, Morgan Stanley considered the results of all of its analyses as a whole and did not attribute any particular weight to any analysis or factor it considered. Morgan Stanley believes that selecting any portion of its analyses, without considering all analyses as a whole, would create an incomplete view of the process underlying its analyses and opinion. In addition, Morgan Stanley may have given various analyses and factors more or less weight than other analyses and factors, and may have deemed various assumptions more or less probable than other assumptions. As a result, the ranges of valuations resulting from any particular analysis described above should not be taken to be Morgan Stanley’s view of the actual value of Compellent. In performing its analyses, Morgan Stanley made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business, regulatory, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters. Many of these assumptions are beyond the control of Compellent. Any estimates contained in Morgan Stanley’s analyses are not necessarily indicative of future results or actual values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by such estimates.

 

Morgan Stanley conducted the analyses described above solely as part of its analysis of the fairness of the consideration pursuant to the Merger Agreement from a financial point of view to the holders of Compellent common stock and in connection with the delivery of its opinion dated December 12, 2010 to the Compellent board of directors. These analyses do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which shares of Compellent common stock might actually trade.

 

The consideration pursuant to the Merger Agreement was determined through arm’s-length negotiations between Compellent and Dell Inc. and was approved by the Compellent board of directors. Morgan Stanley provided advice to the Compellent board of directors during these negotiations. Morgan Stanley did not, however, recommend any specific consideration to Compellent or its board of directors or that any specific consideration constituted the only appropriate consideration for the Merger.

 

Morgan Stanley’s opinion and its presentation to the Compellent board of directors was one of many factors taken into consideration by the Compellent board of directors in deciding to approve, adopt and authorize the Merger Agreement. Consequently, the analyses as described above should not be viewed as determinative of the opinion of the Compellent board of directors with respect to the consideration to be received by the holders of shares of Compellent common stock or of whether the Compellent board of directors would have been willing to agree to a different consideration.

 

Compellent’s board of directors retained Morgan Stanley based upon Morgan Stanley’s qualifications, experience and expertise. Morgan Stanley is a global financial services firm engaged in the securities, investment management and individual wealth management businesses. Its securities business is engaged in securities underwriting, trading and brokerage activities, foreign exchange, commodities and derivatives trading, prime brokerage, as well as providing investment banking, financing and financial advisory services. Morgan Stanley, its affiliates, directors and officers may at any time invest on a principal basis or manage funds that invest, hold long or

short positions, finance positions, and may trade or otherwise structure and effect transactions, for their own account or the accounts of its customers, in debt or equity securities or loans of Compellent, Dell, or any other company, or any currency or commodity, that may be involved in this transaction, or any related derivative instrument. During the two-year period prior to the date of Morgan Stanley’s opinion, Morgan Stanley provided financial advisory and financing services for Dell and Compellent and received fees in connection with such services. Since January 1, 2008, Morgan Stanley has received aggregate fees from Dell for financial advisory and financing services of approximately $12.6 million. Morgan Stanley may also seek to provide such services to Dell, Compellent and their affiliates in the future and expects to receive fees for the rendering of these services.

 

Under the terms of its engagement letter with Compellent, Morgan Stanley provided Compellent with financial advisory services in connection with the Merger for which Compellent has agreed to pay Morgan Stanley a customary transaction fee estimated to be approximately $7.3 million, which will become payable upon completion of the Merger. Compellent has also agreed to reimburse Morgan Stanley for its expenses, including fees of outside counsel and other professional advisors, incurred in connection with its engagement. In addition, Compellent has agreed to indemnify Morgan Stanley and its affiliates, their respective directors, officers, agents and employees and each person, if any, controlling Morgan Stanley or any of its affiliates against certain liabilities and expenses, including certain liabilities under the federal securities laws, related to or arising out of Morgan Stanley’s engagement or any related transactions.

 

Opinion of Blackstone

 

Blackstone was retained by Compellent to provide it with financial advisory services in connection with a possible transaction involving Compellent. Compellent selected Blackstone to act as its financial advisor based on Blackstone’s qualifications, expertise and reputation and its knowledge of the business and affairs of Compellent. As part of that engagement, Compellent requested that Blackstone evaluate the fairness, from a financial point of view, to Compellent’s stockholders of the consideration to be paid to such holders in the Merger.

 

At the meeting of Compellent’s board of directors on December 12, 2010, Blackstone rendered its oral opinion, which opinion was subsequently confirmed in writing that, as of that date, and based upon and subject to the assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the scope of review undertaken by Blackstone, as set forth in its opinion, the consideration to be paid to the holders of shares of Compellent common stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement was fair to such holders from a financial point of view. At the time of such oral opinion, the consideration to be received by holders of Compellent common stock was expected to be $27.50 per share. The opinion was approved by Blackstone’s fairness committee in accordance with established procedures. The full text of the written opinion of Blackstone dated December 12, 2010 is attached to this proxy statement as Annex D and is incorporated herein by reference. Subsequent to Blackstone making a presentation to Compellent’s board of directors and rendering its oral opinion on December 12, 2010, the Merger consideration was increased by $0.25 per share. Blackstone confirmed in writing the oral opinion that had been previously rendered on December 12, 2010. Blackstone was not requested by Compellent’s board of directors to update the prior opinion that had been rendered to the board. Accordingly, the text of the written opinion attached as Annex D reflects the consideration of $27.50 per share that was expected to be paid as of December 12, 2010 rather than the $27.75 per share that was subsequently agreed to and set forth in the Merger Agreement. You should read the opinion carefully and in its entirety. Blackstone’s opinion was provided to our board of directors in connection with and for the purposes of its evaluation of the Merger only and it does not address any other aspect or implication of the proposed Merger, the Merger Agreement or any other agreement or understanding entered into in connection with the Merger or otherwise. Blackstone’s opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as to how any stockholder should vote with respect to the Merger or other matters. The opinion speaks only as of the date of such opinion and Blackstone is under no obligation to confirm or update its opinion as of a later date. The summary of the opinion of Blackstone set forth in this proxy statement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion.

In connection with rendering its opinion and performing its related financial analyses, Blackstone, among other things:

 

 

In preparing its opinion, Blackstone relied, without assuming responsibility or liability for independent verification, upon the accuracy and completeness of all financial and other information that was available from public sources and all financial forecasts and other information provided to Blackstone by or on behalf of Compellent or was otherwise discussed with or reviewed by or for Blackstone. Blackstone assumed that the financial forecasts prepared by or on behalf of Compellent and the assumptions underlying those forecasts, including the amounts and the timing of all financial and other performance data, have been reasonably prepared in accordance with industry practice and represent Compellent management’s best estimates and judgments as of the date of their preparation. Blackstone assumed no responsibility for and expressed no opinion as to such analyses or forecasts or the assumptions on which they were based. Blackstone further relied upon the assurances of the management of Compellent that they were not aware of any facts that would make the financial forecasts and other information provided by them inaccurate, incomplete or misleading.

Blackstone also assumed that the final executed Merger Agreement would not differ in any material respects from the December 12, 2010 draft furnished to it. Blackstone also assumed that the proposed Merger would be consummated in accordance with the Merger Agreement, without waiver, modification or amendment of any material term, condition or agreement therein and that, in the course of obtaining the necessary regulatory or third party consents and approvals (contractual or otherwise) for the Merger, no delay, limitation, restriction or condition will be imposed that would have an adverse effect on Compellent and Dell or the contemplated benefits of the Merger. Blackstone is not a legal, tax, or regulatory advisor and relied upon, without independent verification, the assessment of Compellent and its legal, tax and regulatory advisors with respect to such matters.

 

In reaching the conclusions set forth in Blackstone’s opinion, Blackstone did not consider the relative merits of the Merger as compared to any other business plan or opportunity that might be available to Compellent or the effect of any other arrangement in which Compellent might engage. Blackstone did not make any independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of Compellent, nor was Blackstone furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals. Blackstone did not conduct a physical inspection of any of Compellent’s properties or assets. In rendering its opinion, Blackstone expressed no opinion as to any of the foregoing.

 

Blackstone’s opinion was necessarily based upon economic, market, monetary, regulatory and other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated, and the information made available to Blackstone, as of the date of its opinion. Furthermore, Blackstone expressed no opinion as to the prices or trading ranges at which Compellent common stock will trade at any time.

 

Blackstone’s opinion is limited to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Compellent common stock of the consideration to be paid pursuant to the Merger Agreement, and Blackstone expressed no opinion as to the fairness of the Merger to the holders of any other class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of Compellent or as to the underlying decision by Compellent to engage in the Merger. Blackstone also expressed no opinion as to the fairness of the amount or nature of the compensation to any of Compellent’s officers, directors or employees, or any class of such persons, relative to the compensation to the public stockholders of Compellent. Furthermore, Blackstone did not evaluate the solvency of Compellent or Dell under any state or federal laws, and did not express any opinion as the impact of the Merger on the solvency or viability of Dell or the surviving corporation in the Merger or the ability of Dell or the surviving corporation in the Merger to pay their obligations when they become due.

 

The Blackstone opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any Compellent stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote with respect to the Merger or other matters, and should not be relied upon by any Compellent stockholder as such. Blackstone also did not address any other aspect or implication of the Merger, the Merger Agreement or any other agreement or understanding entered into in connection with the Merger or otherwise. Blackstone assumed no responsibility for updating or revising its opinion based on circumstances or events occurring after the date of its opinion.

 

The Merger consideration was determined through negotiations between Compellent and Dell and was approved by the Compellent board of directors. Blackstone provided advice to the Compellent board of directors during these negotiations, but did not recommend any specific consideration to Compellent or its board of directors or suggest that any specific consideration constituted the only appropriate consideration for the Merger. In addition, Blackstone’s opinion and its presentation to the Compellent board of directors were one of many factors taken into consideration by the board of directors in deciding to approve the Merger. Consequently, the analyses as described below should not be viewed as determinative of the opinion of the Compellent board of directors with respect to the consideration to be paid to the holders of shares of Compellent common stock or of whether the Compellent board of directors would have been willing to agree to a different consideration.

 

The following is a brief summary of the material financial analyses performed by Blackstone in connection with its oral opinion and the preparation of its written opinion letter dated December 12, 2010 to Compellent’s board of directors. This summary does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses performed by Blackstone or its presentation to Compellent’s board of directors on December 12, 2010. This summary includes information presented in tabular format, which tables must be read together with the corresponding text, and considered as a whole, in order to fully understand the financial analyses presented by Blackstone. The tables alone do not constitute a complete summary of the financial analyses. The order in which these analyses are presented below, and

the results of these analyses, should not be taken as any indication of the relative importance or weight given to these analyses by Blackstone or Compellent’s board of directors. Except as otherwise noted, the following quantitative information, to the extent that it is based on market data, is based on market data as it existed on or before December 10, 2010, and is not necessarily indicative of current or future market conditions.

 

Historical Share Price Analysis

 

Blackstone performed a historical share price analysis to obtain background information and perspective with respect to the historical share prices of Compellent common stock. Blackstone reviewed the historical price performance and average closing prices of Compellent common stock for various periods ending on December 10, 2010. Blackstone observed the premium implied by a transaction at $27.50 per share of Compellent common stock, as follows:

 

 

Wall Street Price Targets and 52-Week Trading Range

 

Blackstone reviewed the price targets for the Compellent common stock prepared and published by equity research analysts and available to the public as of December 12, 2010. These targets reflect each analyst’s estimate of the future public market-trading price of Compellent’s common stock and are not discounted to reflect present value. The public market trading price targets published by equity research analysts do not necessarily reflect current market trading prices for the Compellent common stock and these estimates are subject to uncertainties, including the future financial performance of Compellent and future financial market conditions. In reviewing current Wall Street research estimates for Compellent, Blackstone observed that based on the firms providing such data, the median price target for Compellent was $24.00 and the range for price targets was $22.00 to $40.00. Blackstone also observed that the 52-week trading range for Compellent Common Stock was a low of $11.18 and a high of $33.65.

 

Trading Valuation Analysis

 

Blackstone performed a trading valuation analysis, which is designed to estimate an implied value of a company by reviewing its trading valuations and the trading valuations of similar companies that are publicly traded. Blackstone analyzed the market values and trading multiples of Compellent and of 15 publicly traded companies in the storage, networking, and diversified information technology sectors that were viewed as being similar to Compellent in one or more respects. There are no publicly traded comparable companies which are identical to Compellent due to the complexity and variation of Compellent’s business. In evaluating the trading history of the selected comparable companies and Compellent and selecting representative ranges of financial multiples, Blackstone made judgments and assumptions with regard to industry performance, general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of Compellent, such as the impact of competition on the business of Compellent or the industry generally, industry growth and the absence of any adverse material change in the financial condition and prospects of Compellent or the industry or in the financial markets in general. Simple mathematical analysis (such as applying mean or median multiples) is not

 

 

¹ Excludes post October 25, 2010 period of run-up in stock price due to acquisition speculation.

in itself a meaningful method of using comparable company data. Except as noted below, Blackstone used data as of December 12, 2010, for the following companies:

 

Diversified Information Technology Companies

 

 

Data Storage Companies

 

 

Networking Companies

 

 

For each comparable company indicated above, based on publicly available consensus equity research analysts estimates, Blackstone calculated multiples of total enterprise value, or TEV (defined as market capitalization plus debt, which includes interest-bearing debt, preferred stock, minority interests, and earn-out obligations, if any, less cash and cash equivalents and unconsolidated equity investments, if any), to revenue, based upon calendar year 2011 estimated results. In reviewing the trading valuation analysis, Blackstone considered that at the time of the rendering of its opinion, the recent trading ranges of many of the comparable companies were affected by merger and acquisition activity in their sectors or had been acquired. Blackstone also gave consideration to, among other things, scale, profitability and growth characteristics of the companies in each sector while recognizing the extent to which the companies in each such sector possess distinguishing characteristics from Compellent. Accordingly, Blackstone reviewed historical TEV/NTM revenue multiples for Compellent and a market-capitalization weighted index of the data storage companies listed above, or the Data Storage Companies, from February 2008 to December

2010, and derived the range of multiples for Compellent and the Data Storage Companies index as set forth in the following table:

 

TEV/NTM Revenue Multiples

 

 

Based on the foregoing and applying its professional judgment, Blackstone selected a reference range of TEV to revenue multiples deemed most meaningful for this analysis and applied this range of multiples to estimates of 2011 Compellent revenue included in the Management Case. In addition, for illustrative purposes, Blackstone also applied this range of multiples to revenue estimates included in publicly available consensus equity research analysts’ estimates of Compellent’s future performance available from CapitalIQ as of December 12, 2010, which we refer to as the CapitalIQ Street Case. Based on these calculations, this analysis implied a range of per share values for Compellent common stock as shown in the table below:

 

 

Discounted Cash Flow to Equity Analysis

 

Blackstone performed a discounted cash flow to equity analysis, which is designed to estimate an implied value of a company by calculating the present value of the estimated future levered free cash flows and terminal value of the company. Blackstone calculated a range of implied equity values per share of Compellent common stock based on forecasts of future cash flows for fiscal years 2011 through 2015 provided by management of Compellent. Blackstone first calculated levered free cash flows (calculated as net income, plus depreciation and amortization, less the amount of any increase or plus the amount of any decrease in net working capital, plus increases in deferred revenue, less capital expenditures and less stock-based compensation costs) of Compellent for fiscal years 2011 to 2015. Blackstone then calculated a terminal value for Compellent by applying a range of next twelve month, or NTM, P/E multiples of 17.5x to 22.5x to Compellent management’s forecast of net income for Compellent for fiscal year 2016. Blackstone selected these terminal multiples based on a review of current and historical trading multiples for the Data Storage Companies and the application of its professional judgment. These values were then discounted to present values as of January 1, 2011 using a range of discount rates of 12.5% to 14.5% to calculate a range of implied aggregate values for Compellent. The range of discount rates was determined based on an analysis of the weighted average cost of capital of Compellent. Based on these calculations, this analysis implied a range of per share values for Compellent common stock as shown in the table below:

 

 

For illustrative purposes, Blackstone also calculated a range of implied equity values per share of Compellent common stock based on CapitalIQ Street Case estimates of net income for 2011 through 2013. In preparing its analysis, Blackstone extrapolated the estimates for 2013 through 2015 for the CapitalIQ Street Case from the last year of estimates contained therein. These extrapolations were prepared solely for the purpose of performing Blackstone’s illustrative analyses utilizing the CapitalIQ Street Case and not with a view toward public disclosure. The extrapolated estimates were based on variables and assumptions that are inherently uncertain and may be

beyond the control of Compellent and, accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those contained in the extrapolations. Blackstone then calculated a terminal value for Compellent by applying a range of NTM P/E multiples of 17.5x to 22.5x to the CapitalIQ Street Case estimated net income for fiscal year 2016 for Compellent. These values were then discounted to present values as of January 1, 2011 using a range of discount rates of 12.5% to 14.5%, to calculate a range of implied aggregate values for Compellent. Based on these calculations, this analysis implied a range of per share values for Compellent common stock as shown in the table below:

 

 

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

 

Blackstone performed a discounted cash flow analysis, which is designed to estimate an implied value of a company by calculating the present value of the estimated future unlevered free cash flows and terminal value of the company. Blackstone calculated a range of implied equity values per share of Compellent common stock based on forecasts of future unlevered free cash flows for fiscal years 2011 through 2015 provided by management of Compellent. Blackstone first calculated unlevered free cash flows (calculated as earnings before interest and taxes, less taxes, plus depreciation and amortization, less the amount of any increase or plus the amount of any decrease in net working capital, plus increases in deferred revenue, less capital expenditures and less stock-based compensation costs) of Compellent for fiscal years 2011 to 2015, using an assumed tax rate of 35%. Blackstone then calculated a terminal value for Compellent by applying a range of NTM P/E multiples of 17.5x to 22.5x to Compellent management’s forecast of net income for fiscal year 2016 for Compellent. These values were then discounted to present values as of January 1, 2011 using a range of discount rates of 12.5% to 14.5% to calculate a range of implied aggregate values for Compellent. These aggregate values were further adjusted for Compellent’s total debt, minority interest, cash and cash equivalents, to calculate a range of implied equity value per share. Based on these calculations, this analysis implied a range of per share values for Compellent common stock as shown in the table below:

 

 

For illustrative purposes, Blackstone also calculated a range of implied equity values per share of Compellent common stock based on the extrapolated CapitalIQ Street Case estimates of future unlevered free cash flows for fiscal years 2011 through 2015. Blackstone then calculated a terminal value for Compellent by applying a range of NTM P/E multiples of 17.5x to 22.5x to the CapitalIQ Street Case estimated net income for Compellent for fiscal year 2016. These values were then discounted to present values as of January 1, 2011 assuming a range of discount rates of 12.5% to 14.5%, to calculate a range of implied aggregate values for Compellent. These aggregate values were further adjusted for Compellent’s total debt, minority interest, cash and cash equivalents, to calculate a range of implied equity value per share. Based on these calculations, this analysis implied a range of per share values for Compellent common stock as shown in the table below:

 

 

Discounted Equity Value Analysis

 

Blackstone performed a discounted equity value analysis, which is designed to provide insight into the potential future price of a company’s common equity as a function of the company’s estimated future net income and a potential range of price to earnings ratios, or P/E. The resulting value is subsequently discounted to arrive at an estimate of the present value for the company’s potential future stock price.

 

Blackstone calculated ranges of implied future equity values per share for Compellent by applying a range of NTM P/E multiples to estimated net income for Compellent for fiscal year 2015. Blackstone performed this calculation using the Management Case forecasts and, for illustrative purposes, also using extrapolated CapitalIQ

Street Case estimates. Except as indicated in this summary of the discounted equity value analysis, the ranges of multiples utilized were based on the multiples selected for the discounted cash flow to equity and discounted cash flow analyses described above. As described above, these analyses used 2016 as a terminal year while the discounted equity value analysis uses extrapolated CapitalIQ 2015 estimates for Compellent net income. Given that the Management Case shows higher growth in 2015 than assumed for the terminal year of 2016 in the discounted cash flow to equity and discounted cash flow analyses, Blackstone determined that a higher multiple range for 2015 was appropriate for the Management Case. In contrast, because the extrapolation of the CapitalIQ Street Case estimates assumes constant growth rates, Blackstone determined that the multiples applicable to the terminal period in the discounted cash flow to equity and discounted cash flow analyses should be applied to 2015 net income estimates in the CapitalIQ Street Case. Blackstone then discounted the implied future equity values to January 1, 2011 using a range of discount rates of 12.5% to 14.5% to calculate a range of implied aggregate values for Compellent. Based on these calculations, this analysis implied a range of per share values for Compellent common stock as shown in the table below:

 

 

Illustrative Premium to “Unaffected” Share Price Analysis

 

Blackstone performed an illustrative analysis to determine an unaffected share price for Compellent and applied a reference range of premia paid in selected transactions to the unaffected share price. Blackstone analyzed precedent comparable transaction premiums to estimate a range of premiums that could be applied to Compellent’s unaffected share price. Following Dell’s announcement of its initial offer to acquire 3PAR on August 16, 2010 and the subsequent sale of 3PAR to Hewlett Packard, acquisition speculation and rumors continued to be prevalent among data storage companies, including Compellent, resulting in increased market valuations. In order to approximate a Compellent share price not influenced by market acquisition speculation, or a share price that could be termed as “unaffected” and not outside of Compellent’s normalized trading range, Blackstone analyzed Compellent’s average forward revenue multiple since its IPO, over the last twelve months and over the last two years, and determined a range of 3.0x to 3.1x. Applying this to consensus Wall Street revenue estimates for NTM yielded an implied unaffected price of approximately $20.00. Blackstone also applied the rate of increase in the NASDAQ composite index since Dell’s initial offer to acquire 3PAR of 21.4% to Compellent’s price prior to Dell’s offer for 3PAR of $11.86 and also applied the one day percentage increase in Compellent shares after Compellent’s third quarter earnings announcement of 32.0% to calculate an implied unaffected price of $19.00. Blackstone also noted that the average Compellent closing price over the last 52 weeks was $17.52 per share. Based on these analyses and applying its professional judgment, Blackstone estimated an implied unaffected price for Compellent of $19.00 per share. Blackstone noted that establishing an unaffected stock price under these circumstances is challenging and that this calculation was performed for illustrative purposes only and did not suggest that absent acquisition speculation and rumors, Compellent stock could be expected to trade at or around this value.

 

Blackstone analyzed a large number of recent transactions in the technology sector to determine the premium paid as a percentage of equity value and enterprise value for the target as determined using the stock price on dates that were one day, one week and one month prior to the deal announcement. This analysis indicated a one day premiums paid range of 30% to 40%, which Blackstone applied to Compellent’s illustrative unaffected share price of $19.00. This analysis resulted in a range of implied values for Compellent of $24.70 to $26.60 per share.

 

Selected Precedent Transactions Analysis

 

Blackstone performed a selected precedent transactions analysis, which is designed to imply a value for a company based on publicly available financial terms of selected transactions that share some characteristics with the Merger. Blackstone reviewed and compared the proposed financial terms offered for Compellent to corresponding publicly available financial terms in 30 selected acquisitions and announced offers to acquire which have occurred since 2006 in the storage, networking, and diversified information technology sectors. In its analysis, Blackstone reviewed the following precedent transactions as of the date of announcement:

 

 

For each precedent transaction indicated above, using publicly available analysts’ estimates, Blackstone calculated multiples of transaction value to estimated NTM revenue. From this analysis Blackstone derived the range of and mean and median multiples for the selected precedent transactions set forth in the following table:

 

 

In reviewing this analysis, Blackstone also considered, among other things, the relative comparability of the precedent transactions and targets to the Merger and Compellent. Based on the foregoing and applying its professional judgment, Blackstone selected a reference range of transaction value to NTM revenue multiples deemed most meaningful for this analysis. No company or transaction utilized in the selected precedent transactions analysis is identical to Compellent or the Merger. In evaluating the precedent transactions and selecting representative ranges of financial multiples, Blackstone made judgments and assumptions with regard to industry performance, general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of Compellent, such as the impact of competition on the business of Compellent or the industry generally, industry growth and the absence of any adverse material change in the financial condition and prospects of Compellent or the industry or in the financial markets in general. Simple mathematical analysis (such as applying mean or median multiples) is not in itself a meaningful method of using precedent transaction data.

 

Blackstone applied estimated NTM revenue for Compellent based on forecasts provided by management of Compellent to this reference range of multiples to determine a range of implied values for Compellent. For illustrative purposes, Blackstone also performed this analysis using the CapitalIQ Street Case estimated NTM

revenue for Compellent. Based on these calculations, this analysis implied a range of per share values for Compellent common stock as shown in the table below:

 

 

Miscellaneous

 

The foregoing summary of material financial analyses does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses or data presented by Blackstone. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. Blackstone believes that the summary set forth above and its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of it, without considering all of its analyses, could create an incomplete view of the processes underlying the analyses and its opinion. No single factor or analysis was determinative of Blackstone’s fairness determination. Rather, Blackstone considered the totality of the factors and analyses performed in arriving at its opinion. Blackstone based its analyses on assumptions that it deemed reasonable, including those concerning general business and economic conditions and industry-specific factors. Analyses based upon forecasts of future results are inherently uncertain, as they are subject to numerous factors or events beyond the control of the parties and their advisors. Accordingly, forecasts and analyses used or made by Blackstone are not necessarily indicative of actual future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by those analyses. Moreover, Blackstone’s analyses are not and do not purport to be appraisals or otherwise reflective of the prices at which securities may trade at the present time or at any time in the future or at which businesses actually could be bought or sold.

 

None of the public companies used in the selected comparable companies analysis described above are identical to Compellent, and none of the precedent transactions used in the selected precedent transactions analysis described above are identical to the Merger. Accordingly, an analysis of publicly traded comparable companies and precedent transactions is not mathematical; rather it involves complex considerations and judgments concerning the differences in financial and operating characteristics of the companies and precedent transactions and other factors that could affect the value of Compellent and the public trading values of the companies and precedent transactions to which they were compared.

 

Blackstone is an internationally recognized investment banking firm and is continually engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts and valuations for corporate and other purposes.

 

Pursuant to its engagement letter, Blackstone has acted as financial advisor to Compellent with respect to the proposed Merger, and agreed to render an opinion to Compellent as to the fairness to holders of Compellent’s common stock of the consideration to be paid to such holders in the Merger from a financial point of view. In accordance with its engagement letter, Blackstone will receive a fee of approximately $3.1 million from Compellent for its services, all of which is contingent upon the consummation of the Merger. Compellent has also agreed to reimburse Blackstone for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with Blackstone’s services, and to indemnify Blackstone for certain liabilities arising out of the performance of its services (including the rendering of its opinion).

 

Blackstone’s analyses were prepared solely as part of Blackstone’s analysis of the fairness of the Merger consideration and were provided to Compellent’s board of directors in that connection. The opinion of Blackstone was only one of the factors taken into consideration by Compellent’s board of directors in making its determination to approve the Merger Agreement and the Merger.

 

In the ordinary course of Blackstone’s businesses, Blackstone and its affiliates may actively trade the debt and equity securities of Compellent or Dell or any of their affiliates for Blackstone’s own account or for the accounts of customers and, accordingly, Blackstone may at any time hold long or short positions in such securities.

Delisting and Deregistration of Compellent Common Stock

 

If the Merger is completed, our common stock will be delisted from the NYSE and deregistered under the Exchange Act. Therefore, the provisions of the Exchange Act will no longer apply to Compellent, including the requirement that we furnish a proxy or information statement to our stockholders in connection with meetings of our stockholders. We will also no longer be required to file periodic reports with the SEC.

 

Accounting

 

Dell will account for the Merger as a “purchase,” as that term is used under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, for accounting and financial reporting purposes. Under purchase accounting, our assets (including identifiable intangible assets) and liabilities (including contracts and other commitments) as of the effective time of the Merger will be recorded at their respective fair values and added to those of Dell. Any excess of purchase price over the fair value is recorded as goodwill. Financial statements of Dell issued after the Merger would reflect these fair values and would not be restated retroactively to reflect our historical financial position or results of operations.

 

Effects on Compellent if the Merger is Not Completed

 

If Compellent’s stockholders do not adopt the Merger Agreement, or if the Merger is not completed for any other reason, stockholders will not receive any payment for their shares in connection with the Merger. Instead, Compellent will remain an independent public company and Compellent common stock will continue to be listed and traded on the NYSE. In addition, if the Merger is not completed, we expect that management will operate the business in a manner similar to that in which it is being operated today and that Compellent stockholders will continue to be subject to the same risks and opportunities as they currently are, including, among other things, general industry, economic, regulatory and market conditions. Accordingly, if the Merger is not consummated, there can be no assurance as to the effect of these risks and opportunities on the future value of your Compellent shares. From time to time, our board of directors will evaluate and review, among other things, our business operations, properties, dividend policy and capitalization and make such changes as are deemed appropriate and continue to seek to identify strategic alternatives to enhance stockholder value. If Compellent’s stockholders do not adopt the Merger Agreement, or if the Merger is not consummated for any other reason, there can be no assurance that any other transaction acceptable to Compellent will be offered, or that the business, prospects or results of operations of Compellent will not be adversely impacted. We may also be required to pay the Parent’s expenses and the termination fees as described in “The Merger Agreement — Termination Fees.”

 

Interests of Our Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger

 

In considering the recommendation of our board of directors with respect to the Merger, you should be aware that some of our directors and executive officers have interests in the Merger that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of our stockholders generally. These interests may present them with actual or potential conflicts of interest, and these interests, to the extent material, are described below. Our board of directors was aware of these interests and considered them, among other matters, in approving the Merger Agreement and the Merger.

 

Treatment of Stock Options

 

As of the record date, there were 1,973,997 shares of our common stock subject to stock options granted under our equity incentive plans to our current executive officers and directors. Upon the consummation of the Merger, all outstanding unvested options to acquire Compellent common stock granted under our 2002 Stock Option Plan and held by our executive officers and directors, like all other unvested stock options granted under our 2002 Stock Option Plan and held by our other employees, will accelerate and vest in full. Each vested and outstanding stock option (including any option that will vest contingent upon the consummation of the Merger in accordance with the preceding sentence), granted under either the 2002 Stock Option Plan or the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, that is not exercised immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger will be terminated and converted into the right to receive, with respect to each share of Compellent common stock subject to such stock option, a payment equal to the excess, if any, of $27.75 over the exercise price per share of such stock option, without interest and less any

applicable withholding taxes. If the exercise price of the option is equal to or exceeds $27.75, the option will be terminated and the holder of such option will not be entitled to any Merger consideration.

 

Assuming the Merger is consummated on February 15, 2011, our executive officers will receive approximately $19.4 million pursuant to the Merger Agreement in connection with the cancellation of their options upon the consummation of the Merger, of which Philip E. Soran, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, will receive $3.3 million, John Guider, our Chief Operating Officer, will receive $5.5 million, Lawrence Aszmann, our Chief Technology Officer, will receive $5.2 million, John Judd, our Chief Financial Officer, will receive $2.0 million, and Brian Bell, our Vice President, Worldwide Sales, will receive $3.4 million.

 

Upon consummation of the Merger, all outstanding options to acquire Compellent common stock that are outstanding and unvested under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan and held by our executive officers and directors immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger (like all other such stock options held by our other employees) will be converted, through assumption or replacement, into options to purchase common stock of Dell. The number of shares of Dell common stock subject to each outstanding unvested stock option assumed or replaced by Dell shall be determined by multiplying the number of shares of Compellent common stock that were subject to such outstanding unvested stock option immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger by the conversion ratio, and rounding the resulting number down to the nearest whole number of shares of Dell common stock. The per share exercise price for the Dell common stock issuable upon exercise of each outstanding unvested stock option assumed or replaced by Dell shall be determined by dividing the per share exercise price of Compellent common stock subject to such outstanding unvested stock option, as in effect immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger, by the conversion ratio and rounding the resulting exercise price up to the nearest whole cent. The conversion ratio will be equal to $27.75 divided by the average of the closing sale prices of a share of Dell common stock, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, for each of the five consecutive days immediately preceding the closing of the Merger. The conversion ratio will be adjusted, as appropriate, to reflect the effect of any stock split or other like change with respect to our common stock or the common stock of Dell occurring after the date of the Merger Agreement and prior to the effective time of the Merger.

 

Employment Arrangements

 

New Executive Offer Letters.  Dell and each of the Compellent’s current executive officers (listed in the table below) have entered into offer letters describing the terms and conditions of their employment following the completion of Parent’s acquisition of Compellent. The offer letters were negotiated beginning on December 9, 2010 and were signed by each executive officer on the same day the definitive agreement was signed by Compellent and Dell. Because of the executive officers’ skills and experience with the operations of Compellent, the retention of each individual following completion of the Merger was an important consideration for Dell. The offer letters state the job title to be held by each individual upon completion of the Merger, as well as the annual base salary, annual target bonus (expressed as a percentage of base salary), and projected values of restricted stock units and cash awards that Dell has agreed to grant to executive officers of Compellent upon the closing of the Merger. In addition, the table below sets forth the values of projected Dell long-term incentive grants that Dell expects to grant the executive officers of Compellent (other than Mr. Judd) in March 2012. These awards are described in greater detail below. In addition, the offer letters provide that if an executive’s employment is terminated without cause or by the executive with good reason within 18 months following the consummation of the Merger, the executive would be entitled to severance consisting of cash severance pay (12 months of base salary and the actual cash incentive bonus paid for the most recent fiscal year), acceleration of a portion of his equity awards and payment of continued medical benefit premiums.

 

The following table sets forth:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Each offer letter also contains a provision stating that if any of the payments of benefits each executive officer would receive in connection with the Merger or other similar transaction would constitute “parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code, then the executive officer would receive the full amount of the payments to which he is entitled unless a reduction in such payments would yield a greater total payment for the executive, taking into account all applicable taxes including the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code. If a reduction in payments is necessary, each offer letters specifies the order of reduction of payments.

 

Standard Dell Employment Agreements.  Dell has a form of employment agreement, or the Form Employment Agreement, that all employees of Dell sign regardless of position. Thus, all Compellent employees and executives who join Dell by virtue of the Merger, or the Transferred Employees (as defined in the Merger Agreement), are to enter into the Form Employment Agreement at the effective time of the Merger. All of the executives listed in the table above have signed the Form Employment Agreement. The Form Employment Agreement includes a number of acknowledgments by the Transferred Employee regarding, among other things, (i) at-will employment status, (ii) obligations regarding the use and development of intellectual property, inventions and copyrightable materials and (iii) responsibilities relating to the non-disclosure of confidential information, proprietary information and controlled technology and software. The Form Employment Agreements do not specify the compensation or benefits to be provided to the Transferred Employees.

 

Converted Compellent Stock Options.  In connection with the Merger, all of Compellent executive officers’ unvested Compellent stock options will be assumed or replaced by Dell and converted not later than the Effective Time into Dell stock options. See “— Treatment of Stock Options” for a description of this assumption or substitution and conversion. Although the vesting schedule of the converted Dell stock options will generally be the same vesting schedule as applied prior to the Merger, Dell has agreed to vest all unvested converted Dell stock options held by these executives if these executives’ employment is terminated before the Merger by Dell or a subsidiary without cause or by the executive with good reason. Additionally, as described above under “Interests of Our Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger — Employment Arrangements; New Executive Offer Letters”, a portion of the converted Dell stock options may be accelerated upon a qualifying termination within 18 months following the consummation of the Merger. We refer below to a termination of employment of a covered executive by his employer without cause or by the covered executive with good reason as a “qualifying termination.”

 

The following table sets forth Dell’s estimate of the approximate intrinsic value of the converted Compellent stock options. “Intrinsic Value” refers to the excess of the aggregate fair value of the per share Merger consideration over the aggregate exercise price of the unvested Compellent stock options held by the executive, assuming that the effective time of the Merger occurs on February 15, 2011.

 

 

New Dell Restricted Stock Units.  In connection with Parent’s entry into the Merger Agreement, Dell has agreed to grant certain of the executives listed in either of the tables above awards of Dell restricted stock units, or the New Dell RSUs, pursuant to Dell’s Amended and Restated 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The value of the New Dell RSUs is based on each individual’s compensation and position with Dell and is reflected in the table above under the column with the heading “New Dell RSU Grant.” The New Dell RSUs will vest in three equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant, subject to the holder’s continued employment. Vesting is accelerated in the event of the individual’s death or disability while employed, but not for any other termination. As a condition to receiving the New Dell RSUs, the recipient is obligated to avoid engaging in conduct detrimental to Dell. Dell also has a clawback right that it can exercise after vesting if the individual engages in conduct detrimental to Dell during the course of the individual’s employment with Dell or within twelve months thereafter. This clawback right applies with respect to the entire value of an individual’s New Dell RSUs (determined at the time of grant) (but, for avoidance of doubt, this clawback right does not apply to the converted Compellent stock options).

 

New Dell Cash Awards.  In connection with Parent’s entry into the Merger Agreement, Dell has agreed to make cash awards to each of the executives listed in the tables above. With respect to Mr. Judd, he will receive a cash payment if he remains employed with Dell or a subsidiary through the date that is nine months following the closing date of the Merger or his employment is terminated in a qualifying termination prior to the date that is nine months following the closing date of the Merger. The value of these cash awards is reflected in the table above under the column with the heading “New Cash Award”. Messrs. Soran’s, Guider’s, Aszmann’s and Bell’s cash awards are performance-based awards payable in two equal installments in each of 2012 and 2013 if such executives meet performance goals to be established by Dell and remain employed through the applicable payment date.

 

Projected Dell Long-Term Incentive Awards.  In connection with Parent’s entry into the Merger Agreement, Dell has provided certain of the executives listed in the tables above with information regarding the projected value of the long-term incentive awards expected to be granted to the executive in March 2012, or the Projected LTI Awards, assuming the executive remains employed with Dell or a subsidiary at the time of grant. The projected value of the Projected LTI Awards is reflected in the table above under the column with the heading “Projected LTI Award.” One-half of the value of the Projected LTI Awards is currently expected to be granted in the form of New Dell RSUs, and the other half is intended to be granted in the form of Dell stock options. It is intended that the Projected LTI Awards will vest in three equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant, subject to the holder’s continued employment. However, the actual amount and terms (including vesting terms) of the Projected LTI Awards will be determined by Dell in connection with the grant of these awards.

 

Compellent Director Compensation Arrangements and Other Interests

 

As of January 4, 2011, our non-employee directors held options to purchase an aggregate of 409,431 shares of Compellent common stock with exercise prices below $27.75 per share at a weighted average exercise price of $11.65 per share. Prior to the consummation of the Merger, any unvested shares subject to such stock options held by our non-employee directors will automatically vest. As with our other employees generally, these vested awards will be cancelled and converted into the right to receive the excess of the per share Merger consideration over the applicable exercise price of the awards with respect to the number of shares covered by the awards. The aggregate cash payment that will be made to these non-employee directors in connection with the cancellation of their options

upon the consummation of the Merger is anticipated to be $6.6 million, based on a cash Merger consideration of $27.75 per share. The non-employee members of our board of directors are independent of and have no economic interest or expectancy of an economic interest in Parent or its affiliates, and will not retain an economic interest in the surviving corporation or Parent following the Merger.

 

Indemnification of Directors and Officers; Insurance

 

The Merger Agreement provides that, from and after the effective time of the Merger, Parent will cause the surviving corporation to assume and perform until the expiration of the applicable statue of limitations all rights to indemnification existing in favor of, and all rights to advancement of expenses to, our current or former directors and officers as provided in our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and indemnification agreements with certain directors and officers for acts or omissions occurring prior to the effective time of the Merger. Parent has further agreed to include and cause to be maintained in effect in the surviving corporation’s (or any successor’s) certificate of incorporation, for a period of six years after the effective time of the Merger, the current provisions regarding elimination of liability of directors.

 

For a period of six years after the effective time, Parent has agreed to cause the surviving corporation to maintain in effect our current directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy covering each person currently covered by such insurance policy for acts or omissions occurring prior to the effective time of the Merger. Alternatively, Parent or the surviving corporation may (i) substitute “tail” policies of an insurance company with the same or better rating as our current insurance carrier, the material terms of which, including coverage and amount, are no less favorable in any material respect to our directors and officers than the material terms of our existing policies or (ii) request that we obtain such extended reporting period coverage under our existing insurance programs (to be effective as of the effective time of the Merger). In no event shall Parent or the surviving corporation be required to pay aggregate premiums for insurance in excess of 300% of the amount of the aggregate premiums paid by Compellent for 2010 for such purpose.

 

Appraisal Rights

 

Under Delaware law, you have the right to dissent from the Merger and to receive payment in cash for the fair value of your shares of Compellent common stock as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery, together with interest, if any, as determined by the court, in lieu of the consideration you would otherwise be entitled to receive pursuant to the Merger Agreement. These rights are known as appraisal rights. Stockholders electing to exercise appraisal rights must comply with the provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL in order to perfect their rights. We will require strict compliance with the statutory procedures.

 

The following is intended as a brief summary of the material provisions of the Delaware statutory procedures required to be followed by a stockholder in order to dissent from the Merger and perfect appraisal rights. The following summary does not constitute any legal or other advice, nor does it constitute a recommendation that stockholders exercise their appraisal rights under Section 262.

 

This summary, however, is not a complete statement of all applicable requirements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to Section 262 of the DGCL, the full text of which appears in Annex E to this proxy statement. Failure to precisely follow any of the statutory procedures set forth in Section 262 of the DGCL may result in a termination or waiver of your appraisal rights. All references in this summary to a “stockholder” are to the record holder of shares of Compellent common stock unless otherwise indicated.

 

Section 262 requires that stockholders for whom appraisal rights are available be notified not less than 20 days before the stockholders’ meeting to vote on the Merger that appraisal rights will be available. A copy of Section 262 must be included with such notice. This proxy statement constitutes our notice to our stockholders of the availability of appraisal rights in connection with the Merger in compliance with the requirements of Section 262. If you wish to consider exercising your appraisal rights, you should carefully review the text of Section 262 contained in Annex E to this proxy statement since failure to timely and properly comply with the requirements of Section 262 will result in the loss of your appraisal rights under Delaware law.

If you elect to demand appraisal of your shares, you must satisfy each of the following conditions:

 

 

If you fail to comply with any of these conditions and the Merger is completed, you will be entitled to receive the Merger consideration, but you will have no appraisal rights with respect to your shares of Compellent common stock. All demands for appraisal should be addressed to Compellent Technologies, Inc., 7625 Smetana Lane, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344, Attn: Corporate Secretary, Telephone (952) 294-3300, and must be delivered before the vote on the Merger Agreement is taken at the Special Meeting and should be executed by, or on behalf of, the record holder of the shares of common stock. The demand must reasonably inform us of the identity of the stockholder and the intention of the stockholder to demand appraisal of his, her or its shares.

 

To be effective, a demand for appraisal by a holder of common stock must be made by, or in the name of, such registered stockholder, fully and correctly, as the stockholder’s name appears on his, her or its stock certificate(s).

 

Beneficial owners who do not also hold the shares of record may not directly make appraisal demands to us. The beneficial holder must, in such cases, have the registered owner, such as a broker, bank or other nominee, submit the required demand in respect of those shares. If shares are owned of record in a fiduciary capacity, such as by a trustee, guardian or custodian, execution of a demand for appraisal should be made by or for the fiduciary; and if the shares are owned of record by more than one person, as in a joint tenancy or tenancy in common, the demand should be executed by or for all joint owners. An authorized agent, including an authorized agent for two or more joint owners, may execute the demand for appraisal for a stockholder of record; however, the agent must identify the record owner or owners and expressly disclose the fact that, in executing the demand, he or she is acting as agent for the record owner. A record owner, such as a broker, who holds shares as a nominee for others, may exercise his or her right of appraisal with respect to the shares held for one or more beneficial owners, while not exercising this right for other beneficial owners. In that case, the written demand should state the number of shares as to which appraisal is sought. Where no number of shares is expressly mentioned, the demand will be presumed to cover all shares held in the name of the record owner.

 

If you hold your shares of common stock in a brokerage account or in other nominee form and you wish to exercise appraisal rights, you should consult with your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee to determine the appropriate procedures for the making of a demand for appraisal by the nominee.

 

Within 10 days after the effective date of the Merger, the surviving corporation must give written notice that the Merger has become effective to each stockholder who has properly filed a written demand for appraisal and who did not vote in favor of the Merger Agreement and the Merger. At any time within 60 days after the effective time of the Merger, any stockholder who has demanded an appraisal, and who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or

joined that proceeding as a named party, has the right to withdraw the demand and to accept the cash payment specified by the Merger Agreement for his, her or its shares of common stock; after this period, the stockholder may withdraw such demand for appraisal only with the written consent of the surviving corporation. Within 120 days after the effective date of the Merger, any stockholder who has complied with Section 262 of the DGCL will, upon written request to the surviving corporation, be entitled to receive a written statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted in favor of the Merger Agreement and the Merger and with respect to which demands for appraisal rights have been received and the aggregate number of holders of such shares. A person who is the beneficial owner of shares of common stock held in a voting trust or by a nominee on behalf of such person may, in such person’s own name, request from the surviving corporation the statement described in the previous sentence. Such written statement will be mailed to the requesting stockholder within 10 days after such written request is received by the surviving corporation or within 10 days after expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal, whichever is later. Within 120 days after the effective time, either the surviving corporation or any stockholder who has complied with the requirements of Section 262 and who is otherwise entitled to appraisal rights may file a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery demanding a determination of the fair value of the shares held by all stockholders entitled to appraisal. A person who is the beneficial owner of shares of our common stock held in a voting trust or by a nominee on behalf of such person may, in such person’s own name, file the petition described in the previous sentence. Upon the filing of the petition by a stockholder, service of a copy of such petition will be made upon Compellent, as the surviving corporation. The surviving corporation has no obligation to file such a petition in the event there are dissenting stockholders. Accordingly, the failure of a stockholder to file such a petition within the period specified could nullify the stockholder’s previously written demand for appraisal. We have currently have no intention to file an appraisal petition, and stockholders seeking to exercise appraisal rights should not assume that we will file such a petition or that we will initiate any negotiations with respect to the fair value of such shares. Accordingly, stockholders who desire to have their shares appraised should initiate any petitions necessary for the perfection of their appraisal rights within the time periods and in the manner prescribed in Section 262 of the DGCL.

 

If a petition for appraisal is duly filed by a stockholder and a copy of the petition is delivered to the surviving corporation, the surviving corporation will then be obligated, within 20 days after receiving service of a copy of the petition, to provide the Register in Chancery with a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded an appraisal of their shares and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares have not been reached by the surviving corporation. After notice to dissenting stockholders who demanded appraisal of their shares, the Delaware Court of Chancery is empowered to conduct a hearing upon the petition, and to determine those stockholders who have complied with Section 262 of the DGCL and who have become entitled to the appraisal rights provided thereby. The Delaware Court of Chancery may require the stockholders who have demanded appraisal for their shares to submit their stock certificates to the Register in Chancery for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings; and if any stockholder fails to comply with that direction, the Delaware Court of Chancery may dismiss the proceedings as to that stockholder.

 

After determination of the stockholders entitled to appraisal of their shares of common stock, the Delaware Court of Chancery will appraise the shares, determining their fair value exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the Merger, together with interest, if any. Unless the Delaware Court of Chancery in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause shown, interest from the effective date of the Merger through the date of payment of the judgment will be compounded quarterly and will accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time to time during the period between the effective date of the Merger and the date of payment of the judgment. When the value is determined, the Delaware Court of Chancery will direct the payment of such value, with interest thereon accrued during the pendency of the proceeding, if the Delaware Court of Chancery so determines, to the stockholders entitled to receive the same, upon surrender by such holders of the certificates representing those shares.

 

Upon application by Compellent, as the surviving corporation of the Merger or any stockholder entitled to participate in the appraisal proceeding, the Delaware Court of Chancery may, in its discretion, proceed to trial upon the appraisal before the final determination of the stockholders entitled to an appraisal. Any stockholder whose name appears on the verified list filed by Compellent (as explained above), as the surviving or resulting corporation of the Merger, and who has submitted such stockholder’s certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery, (if

required), may participate fully in all proceedings until it is finally determined that such stockholder is not entitled to appraisal rights under Section 262.

 

In determining fair value, and, if applicable, interest, the Delaware Court of Chancery is required to take into account all relevant factors. In Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court discussed the factors that could be considered in determining fair value in an appraisal proceeding, stating that “proof of value by any techniques or methods which are generally considered acceptable in the financial community and otherwise admissible in court” should be considered, and that “fair price obviously requires consideration of all relevant factors involving the value of a company.”

 

Section 262 of the DGCL provides that fair value is to be “exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger.” In Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court stated that such exclusion is a “narrow exclusion [that] does not encompass known elements of value,” but which rather applies only to the speculative elements of value arising from such accomplishment or expectation. In Weinberger, the Delaware Supreme Court construed Section 262 to mean that “elements of future value, including the nature of the enterprise, which are known or susceptible of proof as of the date of the merger and not the product of speculation, may be considered.”

 

Although we believe the Merger consideration is fair, no representation is made as to the outcome of the appraisal of fair value as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery, and you should be aware that the fair value of your shares as determined under Section 262 could be more than, the same as, or less than the value that you are entitled to receive under the terms of the Merger Agreement. You should also be aware that an investment banking opinion as to fairness from a financial point of view is not necessarily an opinion as to fair value under Section 262. Moreover, the surviving corporation does not anticipate offering more than the value that you are entitled to receive under the terms of the Merger Agreement to any stockholder exercising appraisal rights and reserves the right to assert, in any appraisal proceeding, that, for purposes of Section 262, the “fair value” of a share of our common stock is less than the Merger consideration.

 

Costs of the appraisal proceeding may be imposed upon the surviving corporation and the stockholders participating in the appraisal proceeding by the Delaware Court of Chancery as the Court deems equitable in the circumstances. Upon the application of a stockholder, the Delaware Court of Chancery may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of all shares entitled to appraisal. Any stockholder who had demanded appraisal rights will not, after the effective time of the Merger, be entitled to vote shares subject to that demand for any purpose or to receive payments of dividends or any other distribution with respect to those shares, other than with respect to payment as of a record date prior to the effective time; however, if no petition for appraisal is filed within 120 days after the effective time of the Merger, or if the stockholder delivers a written withdrawal of his, her or its demand for appraisal and an acceptance of the terms of the Merger within 60 days after the effective time of the Merger, then the right of that stockholder to appraisal will cease and that stockholder will be entitled to receive the cash payment for shares of his, her or its shares of our common stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement. No appraisal proceeding in the Delaware Court of Chancery will be dismissed as to any stockholder without the prior approval of the Court, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems just; provided, however, that any stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party will maintain the right to withdraw its demand for appraisal and to accept the cash that such holder would have received pursuant to the Merger Agreement within 60 days after the effective date of the Merger.

 

Failure to comply with all of the procedures set forth in Section 262 of the DGCL will result in the loss of a stockholder’s statutory appraisal rights. In view of the complexity of Section 262, stockholders who may wish to dissent from the Merger and pursue appraisal rights should consult their legal advisors.

 

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger

 

The following summary is a general discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences to our stockholders, whose common stock is converted into cash in the Merger. This summary is based on the current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, applicable Treasury Regulations, judicial authority and

administrative rulings, all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect or different interpretations. Any such change could alter the tax consequences to our stockholders as described herein. As a result, we cannot assure you that the tax consequences described herein will not be challenged by the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, or will be sustained by a court if challenged by the IRS. No ruling from the IRS has been or will be sought with respect to any aspect of the transactions described herein. This summary is for the general information of our stockholders only and does not purport to be a complete analysis of all potential tax effects of the Merger. For example, it does not consider the effect of any applicable state, local, foreign, estate or gift tax laws, or of any non-income tax laws. In addition, this discussion does not address the tax consequences of transactions effectuated prior to or after the Merger (whether or not such transactions occur in connection with the Merger), including, without limitation, any exercise of a Compellent stock option or the acquisition or disposition of Compellent shares other than pursuant to the Merger. In addition, it does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may affect particular Compellent stockholders in light of their particular circumstances, including stockholders:

 

 

The following summary also does not address the tax consequences for the holders of stock options. The following summary assumes that Compellent stockholders hold their common stock as a “capital asset” (generally, property held for investment). For purposes of this discussion, a U.S. person is a beneficial owner of Compellent common stock that is:

 

 

For purposes of this discussion, a “non-U.S. person” is a beneficial owner of Compellent common stock that is not a U.S. person or a partnership (or an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes). If a partnership holds Compellent common stock, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the partners will generally depend on the partners’ status and the activities of the partnership. Partners of partnerships or other pass-through entities holding our capital stock are encouraged to consult their own tax advisors.

 

COMPELLENT STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE SPECIFIC TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THEM OF THE MERGER, INCLUDING THE APPLICABLE U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND FOREIGN TAX CONSEQUENCES, AND AS TO ANY TAX REPORTING REQUIREMENTS OF THE MERGER AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS IN LIGHT OF THEIR OWN RESPECTIVE TAX SITUATIONS.

Treatment of Holders of Common Stock who are U.S. Persons

 

The conversion of Compellent common stock into the right to receive cash in the Merger will be a taxable transaction to U.S. persons. Generally, this means that a Compellent stockholder that is a U.S. person, will recognize a capital gain or loss equal to the difference between (1) the amount of cash the stockholder receives in the Merger and (2) the stockholder’s adjusted tax basis in the common stock surrendered therefor. This gain or loss will be long-term if the holder has held Compellent common stock for more than one year as of the date of the Merger. Under current law, any long-term capital gain recognized by a non-corporate Compellent stockholder that is a U.S. person will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at a maximum rate of 15%. Generally, capital losses are deductible only against capital gains and are not available to offset ordinary income; however, individuals are allowed to offset a limited amount of net capital losses against ordinary income.

 

Appraisal Rights

 

Under specified circumstances, a Compellent stockholder may be entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the Merger. If a Compellent stockholder that is a U.S. person receives cash pursuant to the exercise of appraisal rights, such stockholder generally will recognize gain or loss, measured by the difference between the cash received and such stockholder’s tax basis in such Compellent common stock. Interest, if any, awarded in an appraisal proceeding by a court would be included in such stockholder’s income as ordinary income for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Stockholders of Compellent common stock who may exercise appraisal rights are urged to consult their own tax advisors.

 

Non-U.S. Persons

 

Any gain realized by a non-U.S. person that is a Compellent stockholder upon the receipt of cash in the Merger or pursuant to the exercise of appraisal rights generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax unless: (i) the gain is effectively connected with a trade or business of the non-U.S. person in the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, is attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment of the non-U.S. person); (ii) the non-U.S. person is an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the Merger, and certain other conditions are met; or (ii) the non-U.S. person owned (actually or constructively) more than 5% of Compellent common stock at any time during the five-year period preceding the Merger, and Compellent is or has been a “U.S. real property holding corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes at any time during the five-year period preceding the Merger. Compellent does not believe that it is currently a United States real property holding corporation and does not believe that it has been a United States real property holding corporation at any time during the past five years.

 

An individual non-U.S. person whose gain is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States (as described above in clause (i)) will be subject to tax on such gain in the same manner as a U.S. person, as described above, unless a specific treaty exemption applies. In addition, a non-U.S. person that is a corporation may be subject to a U.S. corporate income tax at regular graduated rates, as well as a branch profits tax equal to 30% (or lesser rate under an applicable income tax treaty) on such effectively connected gain. An individual non-U.S. person described in clause (ii) above generally will be subject to a flat 30% tax on any gain, which may be offset by U.S.-source capital losses.

 

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

 

A Compellent stockholder may be subject to “backup withholding” with respect to certain “reportable payments” including taxable proceeds received in exchange for the stockholder’s Compellent common stock in the Merger. The current backup withholding rate is 28%, but this rate could change at any time. Backup withholding will generally not apply, however, to a Compellent stockholder who is a U.S. person and who furnishes the paying agent with a correct taxpayer identification number on IRS Form W-9 (and who does not subsequently become subject to backup withholding) or who is otherwise exempt from backup withholding, such as a corporation. Compellent stockholders who fail to provide their correct taxpayer identification numbers may be subject to penalties imposed by the IRS. In addition, certain non-U.S. persons such as certain nonresident aliens may establish an exemption from backup withholding by delivering the proper version of IRS Form W-8 certifying their non-U.S. status. Each Compellent stockholder and, if applicable, each other payee, should complete and sign the IRS Form W-9 included with the letter of

transmittal (or other applicable form such as an IRS Form W-8 in the case of non-U.S. persons) in order to provide the information and certification necessary to avoid the imposition of backup withholding, unless an exemption applies and is established in a manner satisfactory to the paying agent. Any amounts withheld from payments to a Compellent stockholder under the backup withholding rules are generally not an additional tax and may be refunded or allowed as a credit against Compellent stockholder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that the stockholder furnishes the required information to the IRS in a timely manner.

 

THE FOREGOING DISCUSSION OF THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER IS FOR OUR STOCKHOLDERS’ GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, OUR STOCKHOLDERS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO THE PARTICULAR TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THEM OF THE MERGER, INCLUDING THE APPLICABLE U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND FOREIGN TAX CONSEQUENCES.

 

Regulatory Matters

 

Under the HSR Act and the rules that have been promulgated thereunder, certain acquisitions of voting securities or assets may not be consummated unless Premerger Notification and Report Forms have been filed with the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, or the Antitrust Division, and the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, and certain waiting period requirements have been satisfied. The Merger Agreement requires Compellent and Parent to use commercially reasonable efforts to prepare any merger notification and to respond as promptly as practicable to any inquiries or requests received from the FTC or the Antitrust Division for additional information or documentation under the HSR Act or take other necessary or advisable actions to close the Merger. Compellent and Parent each filed the required notification on December 14, 2010. The waiting period under the HSR Act expired at 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on January 13, 2011.

 

The Antitrust Division and the FTC routinely evaluate the legality under the antitrust laws of proposed mergers and acquisitions. At any time before or after the consummation of any such transactions, the Antitrust Division or the FTC could take such action under the antitrust laws as it deems necessary or desirable in the public interest, such as seeking to enjoin the Merger, seeking the divestiture of assets or imposing other conditions. Private parties and state attorneys generals may also bring legal actions under the antitrust laws seeking similar remedies. There can be no assurance that a challenge to the Merger on antitrust grounds will not be made or, if such a challenge is made, what the result will be.

 

Under the merger control rules of jurisdictions outside the United States where we or Parent and our respective subsidiaries conduct business, filings may be required and it may be necessary to obtain authorizations, consents, orders or approvals of, declarations, or expirations of waiting periods before consummating the Merger. Parent has determined that filings are necessary under the merger control rules of Austria and Ukraine. Parent, in conjunction with Compellent, filed in both jurisdictions on December 17, 2010.

 

The review powers vested in foreign competition authorities, including those in Austria and Ukraine, include the ability to challenge the legality of the transaction on the basis of its effects on competition or otherwise on the public interest, to seek divestitures or impose other conditions. At any time before (and in some cases after) consummation of the transaction, foreign competition authorities may seek to enjoin the Merger, seek divestiture of assets, or impose other conditions. There can be no assurance that a challenge to the Merger under foreign merger control rules will not be made, or, if such a challenge is made, what the result will be.

 

Parent’s obligation to consummate the Merger is contingent on obtaining authorizations, consents, orders or approvals of, declarations, or expirations of waiting periods in Austria and Ukraine. We and Parent have agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to take all actions necessary or advisable to consummate the Merger.

 

There are no material relationships between Parent and Merger Sub or any of their respective affiliates, on the one hand, and Compellent or any of our affiliates, on the other hand, other than in respect of the Merger Agreement, the reseller agreement described below and those arrangements described above under “The Merger — Interests of our Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger” and, as of the record date, the 342,884 shares of Compellent common stock that Dell purchased in the open market pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plan, representing approximately 1.1% of Compellent common stock outstanding as of that date. As disclosed in a Schedule 13D filed by Dell on December 12, 2010, Dell may in the future acquire additional shares of Compellent common stock under the Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plan, if Compellent common stock trades at prices below $27.01 per share, and may also effect open market purchases of Compellent common stock outside the Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plan at prevailing market prices to the extent equal to or below the price of $27.75 per share. As of January 12, 2011, Dell has not made any additional purchases under the 10b5-1 Trading Plan. Compellent was not aware of the existence of the 10b5-1 Plan or of Dell’s purchases of Compellent common stock prior to the execution of the Merger Agreement.

 

On December 12, 2010, in connection with the Merger Agreement, Compellent entered into a Third Party Supplier Agreement for Hardware and Software, or the reseller agreement, with Dell Products L.P. Pursuant to the terms of the reseller agreement, Dell may purchase Compellent’s hardware products and license Compellent’s standalone software, either directly from Compellent or from one of Compellent’s authorized distributors, for ultimate resale by Dell to Dell’s customers. The term of the reseller agreement is nine months unless terminated earlier in accordance with its terms.

 

Between December 15, 2010 and December 22, 2010, several putative class action lawsuits, or the Lawsuits, have been filed against the members of our board of directors, Parent and Merger Sub arising out of the Merger. Two lawsuits have been filed in the State of Minnesota District Court, Fourth Judicial District in the County of Hennepin, entitled Robert P. Jones v. Black et al and Ernesto Espinoza v. Compellent Technologies, Inc., et al. Six lawsuits have been filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, entitled Genesee County Employees’ Retirement System v. Soran et al., The Booth Family Trust v. Compellent Technologies, Inc., et al., Tom Dehorn v. Philip E. Soran, et al., City of Orlando Police Pension Fund v. Philip E. Soran, et al., Shahan Avakian v. Philip Soran, et al. and Jason Sumner v. Philip E. Soran, et. al. The Delaware lawsuits were consolidated by order of the Court on January 10, 2010. The Lawsuits allege that the members of our board of directors breached their fiduciary duties of care, loyalty, good faith, candor and independence to our stockholders by entering into the Merger Agreement because they, among other things (i) failed to maximize stockholder value, (ii) prematurely announced their decision to sell Compellent to Parent to depress the stock price, (iii) failed to exercise valid business judgment in connection with the Merger Agreement, (iv) acted to better their own interests at the expense of Compellent’s public stockholders, and (v) agreed to preclusive deal protection terms. The Lawsuits allege that Parent and Merger Sub aided and abetted our board of directors in breaching their fiduciary duties. Plaintiffs seek to enjoin the acquisition of Compellent by Merger Sub and Parent or rescission of the Merger in the event it is consummated and seek monetary damages in an unspecified amount. We believe the allegations in the Lawsuits are entirely without merit and we intend to defend against them vigorously.

 

We are furnishing this proxy statement to you as part of the solicitation of proxies by our board of directors for use at the Special Meeting.

 

Date, Time and Place

 

The Special Meeting will be held at our offices at 7625 Smetana Lane, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 at 10:00 a.m., local time, on February 15, 2011.

 

Purpose of the Special Meeting

 

You will be asked at the Special Meeting to adopt the Merger Agreement. The board of directors has determined that the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger, are advisable, fair to, and in the best interests of, Compellent and our stockholders and recommends that our stockholders vote to adopt the Merger Agreement. If necessary, you will also be asked to vote on a proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting for the purpose of soliciting proxies to vote in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement.

 

Record Date; Stock Entitled to Vote; Quorum

 

Only holders of record of Compellent common stock at the close of business on January 4, 2011, or the record date, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Special Meeting. Each share of Compellent common stock issued and outstanding on the record date is entitled to one vote at the Special Meeting. On the record date, 32,010,342 shares of Compellent common stock were issued and outstanding and held by 215 holders of record. A quorum will be present at the Special Meeting if a majority of the outstanding shares of Compellent common stock entitled to vote on the record date are represented in person or by proxy. In the event that a quorum is not present at the Special Meeting, or there are not sufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to adopt the Merger Agreement, it is expected that the meeting will be adjourned to solicit additional proxies if the holders of a majority of the shares of Compellent common stock present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote at the Special Meeting approve an adjournment. Holders of record of Compellent common stock on the record date are entitled to one vote per share at the Special Meeting on each proposal presented.

 

Vote Required

 

The adoption of the Merger Agreement requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Compellent common stock on the record date. If you abstain from voting or do not vote, either in person or by proxy, it will have the same effect as a vote “against” the adoption of the Merger Agreement. The approval of the adjournment of the Special Meeting requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Compellent common stock present, in person or by proxy, at the Special Meeting. If you abstain from voting or do not vote, either in person or by proxy, it will have the same effect as a vote “against” the approval of an adjournment of the Special Meeting.

 

Voting of Proxies

 

All shares represented by properly executed proxies received in time for the Special Meeting will be voted at the Special Meeting in the manner specified by the holders. Properly executed proxies that do not contain voting instructions will be voted “FOR” the adoption of the Merger Agreement and “FOR” approval of the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary.

 

To vote, please complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card or, to appoint a proxy over the Internet or by telephone, follow the instructions provided below. If you attend the Special Meeting and wish to vote in person, you may withdraw your proxy and vote in person. If your shares are held in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the holder of record to be able to vote at the Special Meeting.

Shares of Compellent common stock represented at the Special Meeting but not voted, including shares of Compellent common stock for which proxies have been received but for which stockholders have abstained, will be treated as present at the Special Meeting for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of all business.

 

Only shares affirmatively voted for the adoption of the Merger Agreement, including properly executed proxies that do not contain specific voting instructions, will be counted “FOR” that proposal. If you abstain from voting, it will have the same effect as a vote “against” the adoption of the Merger Agreement and “against” the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting. If you do not execute a proxy card, it will have the same effect as a vote “against” the adoption of the Merger Agreement and “against” the proposal to grant authority to adjourn the Special Meeting. Brokers who hold shares in street name for customers have the authority to vote on “routine” proposals when they have not received instructions from beneficial owners. However, brokers are precluded from exercising their voting discretion with respect to approval of non-routine matters, such as the adoption of the Merger Agreement and, as a result, absent specific instructions from the beneficial owner of such shares, brokers are not empowered to vote those shares, referred to generally as “broker non-votes.” Broker non-votes will be treated as shares that are present at the Special Meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists and will have the same effect as votes “against” the adoption of the Merger Agreement and on the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary.

 

No business may be transacted at the Special Meeting other than the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and, if necessary, the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting.

 

Voting over the Internet or by Telephone

 

You may also grant a proxy to vote your shares over the Internet or by telephone. The law of Delaware, under which we are incorporated, specifically permits electronically transmitted proxies, provided that each such proxy contains or is submitted with information from which the inspector of election can determine that such proxy was authorized by the stockholder.

 

The Internet and telephone voting procedures described below are designed to authenticate stockholders’ identities, to allow stockholders to grant a proxy to vote their shares and to confirm that stockholders’ instructions have been recorded properly. Stockholders granting a proxy to vote over the Internet should understand that there may be costs associated with electronic access, such as usage charges from Internet access providers and telephone companies, that must be borne by the stockholder.

 

For Shares of Common Stock Registered in Your Name

 

Stockholders of record may go to www.proxyvote.com to grant a proxy to vote their shares over the Internet. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. Any stockholder using a touch-tone telephone may also grant a proxy to vote shares by calling 1-800-690-6903 and following the recorded instructions.

 

For Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker or Bank

 

Most beneficial owners whose stock is held in street name receive instructions for authorizing votes by their banks, brokers or other agents, rather than from our proxy card.

 

A number of brokers and banks are participating in a program that offers the means to authorize votes over the Internet and by telephone. If your shares are held in an account with a broker or bank participating in such a program, you may authorize a proxy to vote those shares over the Internet at the Internet URL specified on the instruction form received from your broker of bank, or by telephone by calling the telephone number shown on the instruction form received from your broker or bank.

General Information for All Shares Voted over the Internet or by Telephone

 

Votes submitted over the Internet or by telephone must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on February 14, 2011. Submitting your proxy over the Internet or by telephone will not affect your right to vote in person should you decide to attend the Special Meeting.

 

Revocability of Proxies

 

The grant of a proxy on the enclosed proxy card or over the Internet or by telephone does not preclude a stockholder from voting in person at the Special Meeting. You may revoke your proxy at any time before the shares reflected on your proxy card are voted at the Special Meeting by:

 

 

Your attendance at the Special Meeting will not in and of itself constitute the revocation of a proxy. If you have instructed your broker to vote your shares, you must follow the directions received from your broker to change these instructions.

 

Solicitation of Proxies

 

This proxy solicitation is being made and paid for by Compellent. In addition, we have retained MacKenzie Partners, Inc. or MacKenzie, to assist in the solicitation. We will pay MacKenzie approximately $50,000 plus out-of-pocket expenses for its assistance. Our directors, officers and employees may also solicit proxies by personal interview, mail, e-mail, telephone or facsimile. These persons will not be paid additional remuneration for their efforts. We will also request brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward proxy solicitation material to the beneficial owners of shares of Compellent common stock that the brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries hold of record. We will reimburse them for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.

 

You should not send your stock certificates with your proxy. A letter of transmittal with instructions for the surrender of common stock certificates will be mailed to our stockholders as soon as practicable after completion of the Merger.

 

Delivery of this Proxy Statement to Multiple Stockholders with the Same Address

 

The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (for example, brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address if we believe the stockholders are members of the same family by delivering a single proxy statement addressed to those stockholders. Each stockholder will continue to receive a separate proxy card or voting instruction card. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies by reducing the volume of duplicate information.

 

A number of brokers with account holders who are our stockholders will be “householding” our proxy materials. A single proxy statement will be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once you have received notice from your broker or us that they will be “householding” communications to your address, “householding” will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If your household received a single proxy statement, but you would prefer to receive your own copy, please notify your broker and direct your written request to Compellent Technologies, Inc., Attention: Investor Relations, 7625 Smetana Lane, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344, or contact our Investor Relations Department at (952) 294-3300. If you would like to receive your own set of our proxy materials in the future, or are one of multiple stockholders sharing an address and would like to request “householding” in the future, please contact your broker and Compellent Technologies, Inc., Investor Relations and inform them of your request. Be sure to include your name, the name of your brokerage firm and your account number.

 

The following description sets forth the material provisions of the Merger Agreement but does not purport to describe all of the terms of the Merger Agreement. The full text of the Merger Agreement is attached to this proxy statement as Annex A. You are urged to read the Merger Agreement in its entirety because it is the legal document that governs the Merger. The Merger Agreement should be read in conjunction with the disclosures in our filings with the SEC available at the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov. The provisions contained in the Merger Agreement are intended to govern the contractual rights and relationships, and to allocate risks, between us and Parent with respect to the Merger.

 

The Merger

 

At the effective time of the Merger, Merger Sub will merge with and into Compellent. Compellent will continue as the surviving corporation and will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent. Parent, as the sole stockholder of Compellent following the Merger, will have the corporate power and authority to control all aspects of the corporate and business affairs of Compellent following the Merger. Merger Sub has no material assets or operations of its own and will cease to exist following the Merger.

 

Closing and Effective Time of the Merger

 

The consummation of the Merger will occur on the second business day after all of the conditions to the consummation of the Merger contained in the Merger Agreement are satisfied or waived. The Merger will become effective upon the filing of a certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. Although we expect to complete the Merger as soon as reasonably practicable after the Special Meeting and the receipt of any required regulatory approvals or consents, we cannot assure you that the conditions to the Merger will be satisfied (or waived, to the extent permitted) or, if satisfied or waived, the date by which they will be satisfied or waived. In addition, because the Merger is subject to closing conditions, we cannot predict the exact timing of the effective time of the Merger. See “The Merger Agreement — Conditions to the Merger” beginning on page 71 of this proxy statement.

 

Merger Consideration

 

At the effective time of the Merger, each issued and outstanding share of Compellent common stock (other than shares of common stock held by us, any of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Parent, Merger Sub, any other wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent, if any, or any Compellent stockholder who properly exercises appraisal rights) will be converted into the right to receive $27.75 in cash, without interest and subject to any applicable withholding taxes, upon surrender of the certificate representing such share of Compellent common stock in the manner provided in the Merger Agreement.

 

Each share of Compellent common stock held by us, one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Parent, Merger Sub or any other wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent, if any, immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger will continue to be held by such party and will not be entitled to any Merger consideration.

 

The per share cash amount will be adjusted as appropriate to reflect the effect of any stock split or other like change with respect to Compellent common stock occurring after the date of the Merger Agreement and prior to the effective time of the Merger.

 

Dissenting Shares

 

Shares of Compellent common stock held by a holder who has made a proper demand for appraisal of such shares of Compellent common stock in accordance with Section 262 of the DGCL and who has otherwise complied with all the applicable provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL shall not be converted into or represent the right to receive Merger consideration, but shall be entitled only to such rights as are granted by the DGCL to a holder of dissenting shares. At the effective time of the Merger, such dissenting shares shall no longer be outstanding, shall automatically be canceled and shall cease to exist, and such holder shall cease to have any rights with respect thereto, except the rights specified in Section 262 of the DGCL. See “The Merger — Appraisal Rights”.

Treatment of Stock Options

 

Each option granted under our 2002 Stock Option Plan that is outstanding and unvested as of immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger will become vested in full as of immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger (contingent upon the consummation of the Merger). Each option to purchase Compellent common stock that is vested and unexercised immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger (including the options that will vest contingent upon the consummation of the Merger) will be cancelled, terminated and extinguished, and the holder of each such option shall be granted the right to receive (without interest and subject to any applicable withholding taxes), in respect of each share of Compellent common stock subject to such option, an amount in cash, if any, equal to: (i) $27.75 minus (ii) the exercise price per share of Compellent common stock subject to such option. If the per share exercise price of an option equals or exceeds $27.75, then the holder of such option will not receive any cash pursuant to the preceding sentence.

 

At the effective time of the Merger, each option that is outstanding and unvested immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger (other than options granted under the 2002 Stock Option Plan, which will become vested contingent upon the consummation of the Merger as discussed above, and options that otherwise accelerate under the terms of the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan or pursuant to outstanding employment arrangements) will be converted into and become an option to purchase common stock of Dell. To effect this conversion, Dell may, at its discretion, (i) assume our outstanding and unvested options or (ii) replace such options by issuing an equivalent replacement stock option to purchase common stock of Dell, in either case in accordance with the terms of the 2002 Stock Option Plan or our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, as applicable, and the terms of the stock option agreements governing such outstanding and unvested options. The number of shares of Dell common stock subject to each option assumed or replaced by Dell will be determined by multiplying the number of shares of Compellent common stock previously subject to such option by the conversion ratio described below, and rounding the resulting number down to the nearest whole number of shares of Dell common stock. The per share exercise price of each option assumed or replaced by Dell will be the determined by dividing the per share exercise price of such option in effective immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger by the conversion ratio described below, and rounding the resulting exercise price up to the nearest whole cent. The conversion ratio will be equal to $27.75 divided by the average of the closing sale prices of a share of Dell common stock, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, for each of the five consecutive days immediately preceding the closing of the Merger. The conversion ratio will be adjusted as appropriate to reflect the effect of any stock split or other like change with respect to Compellent common stock or the common stock of Dell occurring after the date of the Merger Agreement and prior to the effective time of the Merger.

 

Treatment of ESPP

 

Our 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or the ESPP, will terminate immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger (contingent upon the consummation of the Merger). Any outstanding offering period under the ESPP will be terminated as of the last business day prior to the closing of the Merger, and any purchase rights outstanding under the ESPP at such time will be automatically exercised. We will apply the funds credited as of such date under the ESPP within each participant’s payroll withholding account to the purchase of whole shares of Compellent common stock in accordance with the terms of the ESPP.

 

Payment Procedures

 

Parent will select and enter into an agreement with a reputable bank or trust company that will act as paying agent in the Merger. Promptly after the effective time of the Merger, Parent will deposit with the paying agent an amount of cash sufficient to pay the Merger consideration to our stockholders.

 

Promptly after the effective time of the Merger, the paying agent will mail to each record holder of Compellent common stock a letter of transmittal and instructions for surrendering stock certificates in exchange for Merger consideration. Upon surrender of a stockholder’s stock certificates to the paying agent, together with a duly executed letter of transmittal and such other documents as may be reasonably required by the paying agent or Parent, the stock certificates will be canceled and such stockholder will be entitled to receive the appropriate Merger consideration, less any applicable withholding taxes.

Each certificate representing Compellent common stock that is not surrendered as discussed above will, from and after the effective time of the Merger, be deemed to represent only the right to receive Merger consideration. No interest shall be paid or will accrue on any cash payable to holders of Compellent common stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement. Any portion of the amount deposited by Parent with the paying agent that has not been distributed to our stockholders within one year after the effective date of the Merger will be returned to Parent upon demand, and any of our stockholders who have not surrendered their stock certificates to the paying agent by such time will be required to look only to Parent for the payment of any Merger consideration to which such stockholder may be entitled.

 

Stock certificates should not be surrendered by our stockholders before the effective time of the Merger and should be delivered only pursuant to instructions set forth in the letter of transmittal that will be mailed to our stockholders following the effective time of the Merger. In all cases, the Merger consideration will be paid only in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Merger Agreement and such letters of transmittal.

 

If any certificate formerly representing shares of Compellent common stock is lost, stolen, mutilated or destroyed, then Parent may require the record holder of such certificate to provide an affidavit to that effect and post a bond as an indemnity to Parent prior to receiving any payment of Merger consideration.

 

Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of Compellent Following the Merger

 

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, our certificate of incorporation shall be amended in its entirety at the effective time of the Merger or immediately thereafter to conform to the certificate of incorporation of Merger Sub as in effect immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger, except that the name of the surviving corporation shall be “Compellent Technologies, Inc.” Our bylaws will be amended and restated at the effective time of the Merger or immediately thereafter to conform to the bylaws of Merger Sub as in effect immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger.

 

Directors and Officers of the Compellent Following the Merger

 

Following the Merger, none of our directors or officers will serve as directors or officers of the surviving corporation and the directors and officers of Merger Sub will be the initial directors and officers of the surviving corporation. Under the Merger Agreement, we have agreed to use our commercially reasonable efforts to cause the directors and officers of Compellent to tender their resignations as directors or officers, effective as of the effective time of the Merger.

 

Representations and Warranties

 

In the Merger Agreement, we have made customary representations and warranties to Parent and Merger Sub, including representations relating to: organization, existence and good standing of Compellent; Compellent’s capitalization; authorization, execution, delivery and performance of the Merger Agreement and the agreements and transactions contemplated thereby; no violations of law; conflicts with or consents required in connection with the Merger Agreement and the agreements and transactions contemplated thereby; Compellent and its subsidiaries’ compliance with all applicable laws; absence of legal proceedings; Compellent’s public information and financial statements; absence of undisclosed liabilities; absence of certain changes or events; taxes; property and assets; intellectual property; insurance; contracts; permits and compliance; compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 and other applicable anti-corruption laws; labor matters; environmental matters; employee benefits; related party transactions; information supplied in the proxy statement; application of Section 203 of the DGCL; takeover laws; opinion of financial advisors; and brokers’ and finders’ fees.

 

In the Merger Agreement, Parent and Merger Sub have made customary representations and warranties to us, including representations relating to: organization, existence and good standing of Parent and Merger Sub; authorization, execution, delivery and performance of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby; information supplied in the proxy statement; governmental authority and consents required for the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby; sufficient funds; not being an “interested stockholder” of Compellent; absence of litigation; and operations of the Merger Sub.

Certain representations and warranties in the Merger Agreement provide exceptions for items that do not constitute or are not reasonably likely to result in a “material adverse effect.” For purposes of the Merger Agreement, a “material adverse effect” shall mean any effect, change, event or circumstance that, considered individually or together with all other effects, changes, events and circumstances that exist as of, or shall have occurred or arisen on or before, the date of determination of the occurrence of the material adverse effect, is or would reasonably be expected to be materially adverse to, or has or would reasonably be expected to have or result in a material adverse effect on, (i) the business, operations, financial condition or results of operation of Compellent (and its subsidiaries) taken as a whole or (ii) the ability of Compellent to consummate the Merger or any of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. However, an effect, change, event or circumstance occurring after the date of the Merger Agreement shall not, either alone or in combination, be deemed to be a material adverse effect if such effect, change, event or circumstance results directly from:

 

 

In the event Parent provides us with Parent’s written consent to the taking of any particular action by us, such action shall not, in and of itself, be deemed to constitute a material adverse effect.

Conduct of Our Business Prior to the Merger

 

Affirmative Covenants.  We have agreed that, until the earlier of the effective time of the Merger or the termination of the Merger Agreement, we will:

 

 

Negative Covenants.  We have agreed that, until the earlier of the effective time of the Merger or the termination of the Merger Agreement, except with the prior written consent of Parent, we (and our subsidiaries) will not, among other things:

 

 

 

Stockholder Rights Plan

 

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, on December 15, 2010, we adopted a stockholder rights plan in the form previously approved by Parent. Except as set forth below, we have agreed to not, without Parent’s prior written consent, amend or waive any provision of such rights plan or redeem any of the rights issued under such rights plan. Our board of directors may amend or waive any provision of such rights plan or redeem such rights if: (i) neither

Compellent (nor any subsidiary) nor any representative of Compellent (or any subsidiary) shall have breached or taken any action inconsistent with any of the provisions set forth in no-solicitation or stockholder meeting provisions in the Merger Agreement (described below under “The Merger Agreement — Limitation on Soliciting, Discussing or Negotiating Other Acquisition Proposals”) or any of the provisions in the confidentiality agreement with Dell, our board of directors determines in good faith, after having consulted with our outside legal counsel, that the failure to amend such rights plan, waive such provision or redeem such rights would constitute a breach by our board of directors of its fiduciary obligations to our stockholders under applicable Delaware law, and we provide Parent with written notice of our intent to take such action at least four business days before taking such action; or (ii) a court of competent jurisdiction orders us to take such action or issues an injunction mandating such action.

 

Limitation on Soliciting, Discussing or Negotiating Other Acquisition Proposals

 

We have agreed not to and to ensure that our subsidiaries do not, and not to permit any person that is a Compellent (or a Compellent subsidiary) representative to, directly or indirectly:

 

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, prior to the adoption of the Merger Agreement by the required stockholder approval, we may furnish non-public information regarding Compellent (and our Compellent subsidiaries) to, and may enter into discussions or negotiations with, any person in response to an unsolicited, bona fide, written alternative acquisition proposal that is submitted to us by such person (and not withdrawn) if:

 

 

 

 

If Compellent (or any Compellent subsidiary) or any representative of Compellent (or any Compellent subsidiary) receives an alternative acquisition proposal or acquisition inquiry, then we shall promptly (and in no event later than 24 hours after receipt of such alternative acquisition proposal or acquisition inquiry):

 

 

We shall keep Parent reasonably informed with respect to the status of any such acquisition proposal or acquisition inquiry and any modification or proposed modification thereto, and shall promptly (and in no event later than 24 hours after transmittal or receipt of any correspondence or communication) provide Parent with a copy of any correspondence or written communication (and a written summary of any oral communication) between Compellent (or any subsidiary) or any representative of Compellent (or any subsidiary) and the person that made or submitted such acquisition proposal or acquisition inquiry, or any representative of such person.

 

Compellent has agreed that it will not, and shall ensure that each of its subsidiaries will not, release or permit the release of any person from, or amend, waive or permit the amendment or waiver of any provision of, any confidentiality, non-solicitation, no-hire, “standstill” or similar agreement or provision to which Compellent or any of its subsidiaries is or becomes a party or under which any of Compellent or any of its subsidiaries has or acquires any rights, and will use its commercially reasonable efforts to enforce or cause to be enforced each such agreement or provision at the request of Parent. However, Compellent may release a person from, or amend or waive any provision of, any such “standstill” agreement or provision if neither Compellent (or any subsidiary of Compellent) nor any representative of Compellent (or any subsidiary of Compellent) shall have breached or taken any action inconsistent with any of the no-solicitation or stockholder meeting provisions in the Merger Agreement or any of the provisions in the confidentiality agreement with Dell, our board of directors determines in good faith, after having consulted with an independent financial advisor of nationally recognized reputation and our outside legal counsel, that the failure to release such person from such agreement or provision, the failure to amend such agreement or the failure to waive such provision would constitute a breach by our board of directors of its fiduciary obligations to our stockholders under applicable Delaware law, and Compellent provides Parent with written notice of Compellent’s intent to take such action at least four business days before taking such action.

 

Proxy Statement; Stockholders Meeting

 

We agreed to file this proxy statement with the SEC as promptly as practicable following the date of the Merger Agreement, respond promptly to any comments made by the SEC with respect to this proxy statement and cause this

proxy statement, a form of proxy and other associated materials to be mailed to our stockholders as promptly as practicable after its clearance by the SEC. If any event occurs, or if we become aware of any information, that causes any information provided by us for use in this proxy statement to have become false or misleading in any material respect, we have agreed to promptly inform Parent thereof and promptly file an appropriate amendment or supplement to this proxy statement with the SEC and, if appropriate, mail such amendment or supplement to our stockholders. Additionally, Parent has agreed to promptly inform us if any event occurs, or if Parent becomes aware of any information, that causes any information provided by Parent for use in this proxy statement to have become false or misleading in any material respect, and we have agreed to promptly file an appropriate amendment or supplement with the SEC and, if appropriate, mail such amendment or supplement to our stockholders in such case.

 

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, we have agreed to take all action necessary under all applicable legal requirements to call, give notice of and hold a meeting of our stockholders for the purpose of obtaining our stockholders’ adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, to be held as promptly as practicable following the mailing of this proxy statement to our stockholders. Additionally, we agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to ensure that this proxy statement includes the opinions of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and Blackstone Advisory Partners L.P.

 

Subject to certain limitations set forth below (See “The Merger Agreement — Board Recommendation”) the proxy statement is required to include a statement to the effect that our board of directors (i) has unanimously determined and believes that the Merger is advisable and fair to and in the best interests of Compellent and our stockholders, (ii) has unanimously approved and adopted this Merger Agreement and unanimously approved the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the Merger, in accordance with the requirements of the DGCL, and (iii) unanimously recommends that our stockholders vote to adopt this Merger Agreement at the Special Meeting.

 

Our obligation to call, give notice of and hold the Special Meeting shall not be limited or otherwise affected by the making, commencement, disclosure, announcement or submission of any “superior offer” or other “acquisition proposal”, by any Change in Circumstances (See “The Merger Agreement — Board Recommendation”) or by any Recommendation Change (See “The Merger Agreement — Board Recommendation”). We have agreed that unless the Merger Agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms, we shall not submit any alternative acquisition proposal to a vote of our stockholders and we shall not (without Parent’s prior written consent) adjourn, postpone or cancel (or propose to adjourn, postpone or cancel) the Special Meeting, except to the extent required to obtain the requisite stockholder approval.

 

For the purposes of the Merger Agreement, an “acquisition proposal” means any offer or proposal (other than an offer or proposal made or submitted by Parent or any of its subsidiaries) contemplating or otherwise relating to any “acquisition transaction.”

 

For purposes of the Merger Agreement, an “acquisition transaction” shall mean any transaction or series of transactions (other than the Merger and the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement) involving: (a) any merger, consolidation, amalgamation, share exchange, business combination, joint venture, issuance of securities, acquisition of securities, reorganization, recapitalization, tender offer, exchange offer or other similar transaction: (i) in which any of Compellent or Compellent’s subsidiaries is a constituent or participating corporation; (ii) in which a person or “group” (as defined in the Exchange Act and the rules thereunder) of persons directly or indirectly acquires beneficial or record ownership of securities representing 15% or more of the outstanding securities of any class (or instruments convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for 15% or more of any such class) of any of Compellent or Compellent’s subsidiaries; or (iii) in which any of Compellent or Compellent’s subsidiaries issues securities representing 15% or more of the outstanding securities of any class of Compellent or Compellent’s subsidiaries (or instruments convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for 15% or more of any such class); (b) any sale, lease, exchange, transfer, license, sublicense, acquisition or disposition of any business or businesses or assets that constitute or account for 15% or more of the consolidated net revenues, consolidated net income or consolidated assets of Compellent or Compellent’s subsidiaries; or (c) any liquidation or dissolution of Compellent or Compellent’s subsidiaries.

 

For the purposes of the Merger Agreement, a “superior offer” shall mean an unsolicited, bona fide, written offer by a third party to purchase, in exchange for consideration consisting exclusively of cash or publicly traded

equity securities or a combination thereof, substantially all of the outstanding shares of Compellent common stock that: (i) was not obtained or made as a direct or indirect result of a breach of or any action inconsistent with any of the no-solicitation or stockholder meeting provisions in the Merger Agreement or any of the provisions in the confidentiality agreement with Dell or a breach of any “standstill” or similar agreement or provision under which we (or any of our subsidiaries) has or had any rights or obligations; (ii) contains terms and conditions that our board of directors determines in good faith, after consultation with a financial advisor of nationally recognized reputation and after having taken into account the likelihood and timing of consummation of the purchase transaction contemplated by such offer, to be more favorable from a financial point of view to our stockholders (in their capacity as stockholders) than the Merger.

 

Board Recommendation

 

The unanimous determination that the Merger is advisable and fair to and in the best interests of Compellent and our stockholders and the unanimous recommendation of our board of directors that our stockholders vote to adopt the Merger Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Board Recommendation.”

 

We have agreed that our board of directors shall not (such actions are referred to as Restricted Actions):

 

 

Notwithstanding the first of the forgoing four bullets, at any time prior to the adoption of the Merger Agreement by the required stockholder approval, our board of directors may withdraw or modify the Board Recommendation, refuse to reaffirm the Board Recommendation, refuse to publicly state that the Merger and the Merger Agreement are in the best interests of our stockholders, refuse to issue a press release announcing its opposition to a competing acquisition proposal or recommend a superior offer (each of the foregoing being referred to as a Recommendation Change), but only if:

 

 

 

Under the Merger Agreement, any change in the form or amount of the consideration payable in connection with a superior offer, and any other material change to any of the terms of a superior offer, will be deemed to be a new superior offer (or other alternative acquisition proposal), requiring a new Recommendation Change notice and a new advance notice period. However, the advance notice period applicable to any such change to a superior offer shall be three business days rather than four business days. Compellent has agreed to keep confidential, and not to disclose to the public or to any person, any and all information regarding any negotiations that take place (as described in the two bullet points immediately above) (including the existence and terms of any proposal made on behalf of Parent or the Company during such negotiations), except to the extent such disclosure is required by applicable law or the rules and regulations of any applicable U.S. governmental body to which Compellent is subject or submits.

 

Employee Matters

 

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, if Parent elects not to maintain any of our employee health, vacation or 401(k) plans after the effective time of the Merger, then, subject to any necessary transition period and subject to any applicable Dell plan provisions, contractual requirements or legal requirements, (i) all of our employees who continue employment with Dell, the surviving corporation or any subsidiary of Dell or the surviving corporation shall be eligible to participate in Dell’s health, vacation and 401(k) plans, programs or arrangements, to substantially the same extent as similarly situated employees of Dell and (ii) for purposes of determining any such employee’s eligibility to participate in such Dell plans, such employee shall receive credit under such plans for his or her years of continuous service with us prior to the effective time of the Merger. As of the effective time of the Merger, Dell will credit to each employee the amount of vacation time and paid time off that such individual had accrued under any applicable plan or ours. If Dell chooses not to maintain one or more of our employee plans that is a health plan or welfare plan, then with respect to each health or welfare benefit plan maintained by Dell in lieu of such plan, Dell shall (i) cause to be waived any eligibility waiting periods, any evidence of insurability requirements and the application of any pre-existing condition limitations under such plan and (ii) cause each employee to be given credit under such plan for all amounts paid by such employee under any similar plan of ours for the plan year that includes the effective time of the Merger for purposes of applying deductibles, co-payments and out-of-pocket maximums as though such amounts had been paid in accordance with the terms and conditions of the applicable plan of Dell or the surviving corporation.

The provisions discussed above do not guarantee that any of our employees will be offered employment with Dell, the surviving corporation, or any subsidiary of Dell or the surviving corporation, and none of such parties are under any obligation to employ our current employees following the effective time of the Merger, other than as may be required under applicable laws.

 

Unless otherwise requested by Parent, Compellent will terminate its 401(k) plan, effective no later than the day prior to the effective time of the Merger.

 

Regulatory Filings

 

We and Parent have agreed to use our commercially reasonable best efforts to file, as soon as reasonably practicable after the date of the Merger Agreement, all notices, reports and other documents determined by Parent to be required to be filed by such party with any government authority with respect to the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the Premerger Notification and Report Forms required to be filed under the HSR Act and any notification or other document required to be filed under Austrian and Ukrainian antitrust or competition law. Compellent and Parent each filed the notification required under the HSR Act on December 14, 2010. The waiting period under the HSR Act expired at 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on January 13, 2011. We and Parent also filed applicable notices in Austria and Ukraine on December 17, 2010.

 

At the request of Parent and conditioned upon the consummation of the Merger, we may be required to divest, sell, dispose of, hold separate or otherwise take or commit to take any other action with respect to any of our or our subsidiaries’ businesses, product lines or assets.

 

Commercially Reasonable Efforts

 

We have agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to take, or to cooperate with Parent in taking, all actions necessary or advisable to consummate the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including (i) making all filings (if any) and giving all notices (if any) required to be made and given in connection with the transactions; (ii) using commercially reasonable efforts to cause the expiration or termination of each waiting period (if any) and to obtaining each consent (if any) required to be obtained in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; and (iii) using commercially reasonable efforts to lift any restraint, injunction or other legal bar to the transactions.

 

Public Statements

 

Compellent has agreed to not, and to not permit any of its subsidiaries or any representative of Compellent (or any of Compellent’s subsidiaries) to, make any disclosure to any employee, to the public or otherwise regarding the Merger or any of the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement or if an alternative acquisition proposal shall have been disclosed, announced, commenced, submitted or made, regarding such acquisition proposal. However, such disclosure may be made, if: (i) Parent shall have given its prior approval to such disclosure; (ii) Compellent (A) shall have been advised by its outside legal counsel that such disclosure is required by applicable law, and (B) prior to making any such disclosure, shall have provided Parent with reasonable advance notice of Compellent’s intention to make such disclosure and certain information regarding such disclosure; (iii) such disclosure is to be filed by Compellent with the SEC and is substantially identical to a disclosure previously filed by Compellent with the SEC with Parent’s approval; or (iv) such disclosure is a public statement made in response to questions from the press, analysts, investors or those attending industry conferences and is consistent with previous press releases, public disclosures or public statements made jointly by the parties (or individually by Compellent, if approved by Parent). Parent has agreed to use reasonable efforts to provide Compellent with advance notice of, and a reasonable opportunity to review and comment on, any press release or public communication Parent intends to issue or make with respect to the Merger.

 

Stockholder Litigation

 

We have agreed to promptly notify Parent in writing of, and give Parent the opportunity to participate in the defense and settlement of, any stockholder claim or litigation (including any class action or derivative litigation) against or otherwise involving us and/or any of our directors or officers relating to the Merger Agreement and the

Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. We have agreed not to compromise or settle any such claim or litigation in full or in part without Parent’s prior written consent (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed).

 

Access to Information

 

We have agreed, subject to certain exceptions and any applicable legal restrictions, to give Parent and its representatives reasonable access upon reasonable notice to our directors, officers, other employees, agents, attorneys, accountants, advisors, personnel and assets and to all existing books, records, tax returns, work papers and other documents and information relating to us and our subsidiaries. We have also agreed to provide Parent and its representatives with copies of such documents and information and with such additional financial, operating and other data as Parent and its representatives may reasonably requests.

 

We have agreed to allow Parent’s senior officers to meet with our chief financial officer and other officers responsible for our financial statements and internal controls to discuss such matters as Parent may deem necessary or appropriate in order to enable Parent to satisfy its obligations under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other applicable legal requirements.

 

Subject to certain limitations, we are not required to provide Parent with any of the documents or other information discussed above to the extent that doing so would violate applicable law, the attorney-client privilege or the terms of our contracts with third parties.

 

Indemnification; Directors’ and Officers’ Insurance

 

The Merger Agreement provides that, from and after the effective time of the Merger, Parent will cause the surviving corporation to assume and perform until the expiration of the applicable statue of limitations all rights to indemnification existing in favor of, and all rights to advancement of expenses to, our current or former directors and officers as provided in our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and indemnification agreements with certain directors and officers for acts or omissions occurring prior to the effective time of the Merger. Parent has further agreed to include and cause to be maintained in effect in the surviving corporation’s (or any successor’s) certificate of incorporation, for a period of six years after the effective time of the Merger, current provisions regarding elimination of liability of directors.

 

For a period of six years after the effective time, Parent has agreed to cause the surviving corporation to maintain in effect our current directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy covering each person currently covered by such insurance policy for acts or omissions occurring prior to the effective time of the Merger. Alternatively, Parent or the surviving corporation may (i) substitute “tail” policies of an insurance company with the same or better rating as the our current insurance carrier, the material terms of which, including coverage and amount, are no less favorable in any material respect to our directors and officers than the material terms of the our existing policies or (ii) request that the we obtain such extended reporting period coverage under the our existing insurance programs (to be effective as of the effective time of the Merger). In no event shall Parent or the surviving corporation be required to pay aggregate premiums for insurance in excess of 300% of the amount of the aggregate premiums paid by Compellent for 2010 for such purpose.

 

Conditions to the Merger

 

The obligation of Parent and Merger Sub to complete the Merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the following conditions:

 

 

 

 

 

Our obligation to complete the Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the following conditions:

 

 

 

 

Termination

 

The Merger Agreement may be terminated prior to the effective time of the Merger (whether before or after the adoption of the Merger Agreement by the required stockholder approval) by written notice of the terminating party to the other parties to the Merger Agreement:

 

 

 

For the purposes of the Merger Agreement, a “triggering event” shall be deemed to have occurred if: (i) our board of directors or any committee thereof shall have made a Recommendation Change (See “The Merger Agreement — Board Recommendation Change”); (ii) our board of directors or any committee thereof, or Compellent (including our subsidiaries) or any of Compellent’s representatives (or representatives of our subsidiaries), shall have taken, authorized or publicly proposed any of the Restricted Actions (See “The Merger Agreement — Board Recommendation”); (ii) we shall have failed to include the Board Recommendation in the proxy statement; (iii) our board of directors shall have failed to reaffirm, unanimously (except for any vote that is not unanimous solely because a director is not present for the vote due to incapacity or because he is not reasonably available to attend a meeting) and publicly, the Board Recommendation within five business days after Parent requests that the Board Recommendation be reaffirmed publicly; (iv) a tender or exchange offer relating to shares of Compellent common stock shall have been commenced and we shall not have sent to our securityholders, within ten business days after the commencement of such tender or exchange offer, a statement disclosing that we recommends rejection of such tender or exchange offer and reaffirming the Board Recommendation; (v) an acquisition proposal shall have been publicly announced, and we shall have failed to issue a press release that reaffirms unanimously the Board Recommendation within five business days after such acquisition proposal is publicly announced; (vi) Compellent (or any of our subsidiaries) or any of Compellent’s (or our

subsidiaries’) representatives shall have breached or taken any action inconsistent with any of the provisions described under “The Merger Agreement — Limitation on Soliciting, Discussing or Negotiating Other Acquisition Proposals”); or (vii) we generally (a) fail to adopt a rights plan (See “The Merger Agreement — Stockholders Rights Plan”), amend such rights plan, waive any provision of such rights plan or redeem any of the rights issued under such rights plan or deliver a notice to Parent of our intent to take such action or (b) release any person from, or amend or waive any provision of, any “standstill” agreement or provision or deliver a notice to Parent of our intention to take such action.

 

Notwithstanding the forgoing, we may not terminate the Merger Agreement unless any fee required to be paid and any expense payment required to be made by us and described in “The Merger Agreement — Expenses; Termination Fees” at or prior to the time of such termination shall have been paid and made in full.

 

Effect of Termination

 

If the Merger Agreement is terminated by either us or Parent in accordance with its terms, the Merger Agreement shall be of no further force or effect. However, the provisions relating to termination and termination fees and other miscellaneous provisions of the Merger Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and certain provisions of the confidentiality agreement between us and Parent shall survive the termination of the Merger Agreement and shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with their terms. The termination of the Merger Agreement shall not relieve any party from any liability for any breach of any covenant or obligation contained in the Merger Agreement or any intentional breach of any representation or warranty contained in the Merger Agreement.

 

Expenses; Termination Fees

 

All fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement shall be paid by the party incurring such fees and expenses, whether or not the Merger is consummated. Parent and Compellent shall share equally all filing fees incurred in connection with the filing by the parties to the Merger Agreement of the premerger notification and report forms relating to the Merger under the HSR Act and the filing of any notice or other document under any applicable foreign antitrust or competition law or regulation.

 

If the Merger Agreement is terminated:

 

 

 

Amendment

 

The Merger Agreement may be amended with the approval of our board of directors and the board of directors of Merger Sub. However, after the adoption of the Merger Agreement by our stockholders, any amendment will require the approval of our stockholders if such approval is required by law. The Merger Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by each party.

 

Remedies

 

Compellent and Dell have agreed that in the event of any breach or threatened breach by Parent or Compellent of any covenant or obligation contained in the Merger Agreement, the other party shall be entitled to obtain, without proof of actual damages (and in addition to any other remedy to which such other party may be entitled at law or in equity) a decree or order of specific performance to enforce the observance and performance of such covenant or obligation and an injunction restraining such breach or threatened breach. The Merger Agreement is be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware.

 

The following description sets forth the material provisions of the voting and support agreement but does not purport to describe all of the terms of the voting and support agreement. The full text of the voting and support agreement is attached to this proxy statement as Annex B. You are urged to read the voting and support agreement in its entirety.

 

As a condition of, and an inducement to, Parent entering into the Merger Agreement, on the date the Merger Agreement was executed, each of Philip E. Soran, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, John P. Guider, our Chief Operating Officer, Lawrence E. Aszmann, our Chief Technology Officer, and entities affiliated with El Dorado Ventures and Crescendo Ventures who collectively beneficially owned approximately 27.4% of our outstanding shares of common stock as of the record date (including shares issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of such date), entered into a voting and support agreement with Parent.

 

Each stockholder party to a voting and support agreement has agreed, during the term of the agreement, at any meeting of the stockholders of Compellent, however called, and in any action by written consent of stockholders of Compellent, unless otherwise directed in writing by Parent, to cause shall cause all equity securities of Compellent owned beneficially or of record by such stockholder including any such securities acquired after the date of the voting and support agreement (such securities, the “subject securities”) to be voted:

 

 

Under the terms of the voting and support agreement, each of the stockholders irrevocably appointed Parent as its proxy to vote in the manner described above all shares of our outstanding common stock held by that stockholder as of the record date.

 

During the term of the voting and support agreement, each stockholder also agrees not to:

 

 

Each stockholder has also agreed that, during the term of the voting and support agreement, such stockholder shall not directly or indirectly, and shall ensure that each of such stockholder’s representatives and affiliates does not directly or indirectly:

 

 

 

Under the terms of the voting and support agreement, each stockholder agrees not to exercise any appraisal or other similar rights that such stockholder may have in connection with the Merger.

 

The obligations of the stockholders under the voting and support agreements continue until the earlier of (i) the date upon which the Merger Agreement is validly terminated, or (ii) the date upon which the Merger becomes effective. If, however, the Merger Agreement (i) is validly terminated pursuant to an End Date Termination or No Vote Termination (as described under “The Merger Agreement — Termination”) and an alternative acquisition proposal shall have been disclosed, announced, commenced, submitted or made at or prior to the termination of the Merger Agreement; or (ii) is validly terminated at any time after the occurrence of a triggering event, then, in each case, the obligations under the voting and support agreements shall continue until the date that is 275 days after the termination of the Merger Agreement.

 

As disclosed in a Schedule 13D filed by Dell on December 12, 2010, referred to as the Schedule 13D, on November 18, 2010, Dell adopted a Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plan, referred to as the 10b5-1 Plan, providing for the purchase in the open market, in compliance with the provisions of Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act, of Compellent common stock in an amount of up to $63.4 million during the period beginning on November 18, 2010 and continuing through January 28, 2011. Dell has disclosed in the Schedule 13D that concurrently with the adoption of the 10b5-1 Plan, Dell appointed UBS Securities, LLC as purchasing agent in connection with the 10b5-1 Plan, and instructed UBS Securities, LLC to purchase up to 1,560,000 shares of Compellent common stock at a price per share of less than $27.01 during the period from November 26, 2010 through December 23, 2010. During such period (through December 3, 2010), Dell acquired beneficial ownership of 342,884 shares of Compellent common stock. Accordingly, pursuant to the voting and support agreements and the 10b5-1 Plan, as of the record date, Dell may be deemed to have acquired beneficial ownership of approximately 28.5% of the shares of Compellent common stock outstanding as of that date (including shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of such date).

 

Dell has disclosed in the Schedule 13D that Dell may in the future acquire additional shares of Compellent common stock under the 10b5-1 Plan, if Compellent common stock trades at prices below $27.01 per share, and may also effect open market purchases of Compellent common stock outside the 10b5-1 Plan at prevailing market prices to the extent equal to or below the price of $27.75 per share. As of January 12, 2011, Dell has not made any additional purchases under the 10b5-1 Trading Plan. Dell has advised Compellent that it intends to vote its shares of Compellent common stock in favor of the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies. Compellent was not aware of the existence of the 10b5-1 Plan or of Dell’s purchases of Compellent common stock prior to the execution of the Merger Agreement.

 

Compellent common stock has been traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “CML” since March 23, 2009. Prior to March 23, 2009, Compellent common stock was traded on the NYSE Arca under the ticker symbol “CML” since it began trading on October 10, 2007. The following table sets forth, for the period indicated, the range of high and low sale prices of our common stock, as reported by the NYSE Arca with respect to the period from January 1, 2008 through March 20, 2009 and by the NYSE for the period thereafter.

 

 

The high and low sales prices per share for Compellent common stock as reported by the NYSE on January 12, 2011, the latest practicable trading day before the filing of this proxy statement were $27.66 and $27.62.

 

There were 215 stockholders of record of Compellent common stock as of January 4, 2011. In addition, we believe that a significant number of beneficial owners of Compellent common stock hold their shares in street name.

 

We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock previously. Historically, we have retained earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of our business.

 

Following the Merger, Compellent common stock will not be traded on any public market.

 

In addition to the other information included in this proxy statement, including the matters addressed in “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information,” you should carefully consider the following risks before deciding whether to vote for approval and adoption of the merger agreement.

 

We will incur substantial expenses related to the Merger, and the Merger might not be completed if we or Dell are unable to fulfill all of the closing conditions.

 

We expect to incur substantial expenses in connection with the Merger whether or not the transaction is consummated. Further, the consummation of the Merger is conditioned upon the fulfillment of certain conditions by each of the parties, including our obligation to obtain all licenses, permits, consents and approvals in connection with the Merger. Although we intend to obtain all such approvals, it is possible that we may not be able to obtain all such approvals. It is not certain if the transaction would proceed in the event that certain of our or Dell’s closing conditions cannot be satisfied. For example, if any required third party consent is not received, it is possible that Dell might not consummate the Merger. If Compellent’s stockholders do not adopt the Merger Agreement, or if the Merger is not consummated for any other reason, there can be no assurance that any other transaction acceptable to Compellent will be offered, or that the business, prospects or results of operations of Compellent will not be adversely impacted.

 

The failure to complete the Merger could negatively affect our stock price and future business and operations.

 

If the Merger is not completed for any reason, the price of our common stock may decline to the extent that the current market price of our common stock reflects a positive market assumption that the Merger will be completed. Furthermore, if the Merger Agreement is terminated, we may be unable to find a third party willing to engage in a similar transaction on terms as favorable as those set forth in the Merger Agreement, or at all. Speculation regarding the likelihood of the closing of the Merger could also increase the volatility of our stock price.

 

Some of our officers and directors have interests in the Merger that may influence them to support or approve the Merger in a manner different than other stockholders.

 

Some of the directors who recommend that you vote in favor of the Merger, and the officers who provided information to our board of directors relating to the Merger, have employment, indemnification, stock option, restricted stock units and bonus arrangements that provide them with interests in the Merger that may differ from yours. The receipt of compensation or other benefits in the Merger may have influenced our directors in making their recommendation that you vote in favor of the transactions called for by the Merger Agreement, and the officers in making recommendations to the our board of directors relating to the Merger.

 

We will no longer exist as an independent public company following the Merger and our stockholders will forego any increase in our value.

 

If the Merger is successful, we will no longer exist as an independent public company and our stockholders will forego any increase in our value that might have otherwise resulted from our possible growth.

 

Upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, we may be required to pay a termination fee to Dell.

 

If the Merger Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances involving competing transactions, a change in our board of directors’ recommendation of the Merger to our stockholders or other triggering events, we may be required to pay Parent a termination fee of $37,000,000 and/or up to an additional $960,000 to reimburse Parent’s expenses. In addition, in connection with a termination of the Merger Agreement under certain circumstances involving a change in our board of directors’ recommendation of the Merger to our stockholders due to a change in circumstances unrelated to an acquisition proposal, we may be required to pay Parent a termination fee of $47,000,000 and up to an additional $960,000 to reimburse Parent’s expenses.

 

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the ownership of our common stock as of January 4, 2011 by all persons who, to our knowledge, were the beneficial owners of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, each of our directors, each of our current named executive officers (as defined in Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K) and all directors and executive officers as a group.

 

Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each of the beneficial owners in the table below is c/o Compellent Technologies, Inc., 7625 Smetana Lane, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, 55344.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Special Meeting may be adjourned without notice, other than by the announcement made at the Special Meeting, by approval of the holders of a majority of the shares of Compellent common stock present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote at the Special Meeting. We are soliciting proxies to grant the authority to vote in favor of adjournment of the Special Meeting. In particular, authority is expected to be exercised if the purpose of the adjournment is to provide additional time to solicit votes in favor of adopting the Merger Agreement.

 

Our board of directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the proposal to grant the authority to vote your shares to adjourn the meeting, if necessary, to provide additional time to solicit additional proxies.

 

Other Matters for Action at the Special Meeting

 

No business may be transacted at the Special Meeting other than the matters set forth in this proxy statement.

 

Stockholder Proposals

 

We will hold an Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2011, or the 2011 Annual Meeting, only if the Merger is not completed. Proposals of stockholders that are intended to be presented at the 2011 Annual Meeting must have been received at our executive offices in Eden Prairie, Minnesota no later than December 14, 2010 to be included in the proxy statement and proxy card related to such meeting.

 

Pursuant to our bylaws, stockholders who wish to bring matters to be transacted or propose nominees for director at our 2011 Annual Meeting, if any, must provide certain information to us between January 13, 2011 and February 12, 2011. Stockholders are also advised to review our bylaws, which contain additional requirements with respect to advance notice of stockholder proposals and director nominations.

 

Where You Can Find More Information

 

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any document we file at the SEC’s public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. Our SEC filings are also available to the public at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

 

Statements contained in this proxy statement, or in any document incorporated by reference in this proxy statement regarding the contents of any contract or other document, are not necessarily complete and each such statement is qualified in its entirety by reference to that contract or other document filed as an exhibit with the SEC. The SEC allows us to “incorporate by reference” into this proxy statement documents we file with the SEC. This means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you to those documents. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be a part of this proxy statement, and later information that we file with the SEC will update and supersede that information. We incorporate by reference the documents listed below and any documents filed by us pursuant to Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the date of this proxy statement and before the date of the Special Meeting (other than Current Reports or portions thereof furnished under Item 2.02 or Item 7.01 of Form 8-K):

 

 

Any person, including any beneficial owner, to whom this proxy statement is delivered may request copies of reports, proxy statements or other information concerning us, without charge, by written or telephonic request directed to us at 7625 Smetana Lane, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Attn: Corporate Secretary, or from the SEC

through the SEC’s website at the address provided above. Documents incorporated by reference are available without charge, excluding any exhibits to those documents unless the exhibit is specifically incorporated by reference into those documents. Upon written or telephonic request as provided above, we will, within one business day of receiving such request, mail copies of any or all items incorporated by reference herein, excluding any exhibits to those documents unless the exhibit is specifically incorporated by reference into those documents, to the requesting party by first class mail or other equally prompt means.

 

Parent has supplied all information contained in this proxy statement relating to Parent, Merger Sub and Dell and we have supplied all information relating to Compellent.

 

* * *

 

THIS PROXY STATEMENT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE THE SOLICITATION OF A PROXY IN ANY JURISDICTION TO OR FROM ANY PERSON TO WHOM OR FROM WHOM IT IS UNLAWFUL TO MAKE SUCH PROXY SOLICITATION IN THAT JURISDICTION. YOU SHOULD RELY ONLY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT. WE HAVE NOT AUTHORIZED ANYONE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION THAT IS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT IS CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT. THIS PROXY STATEMENT IS DATED JANUARY 14, 2011. YOU SHOULD NOT ASSUME THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT IS ACCURATE AS OF ANY DATE OTHER THAN THAT DATE. NEITHER THE MAILING OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT TO STOCKHOLDERS NOR THE ISSUANCE OF CASH IN THE MERGER CREATES ANY IMPLICATION TO THE CONTRARY.

 

EXECUTION VERSION

 

 

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

among:

Dell International L.L.C.,
a Delaware limited liability company;

Dell Trinity Holdings Corp.,
a Delaware corporation;

and

Compellent Technologies, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation

 

 

Dated as of December 12, 2010

 

 

 

Table of Contents