UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-Q

Commission File Number 0-12728

INTEGRAL VISION, INC.

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (248) 471-2660

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES   x        NO     o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES    o      NO    x

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock, no par value, stated value $.20 per share, as of July 31, 2004 was 14,832,638.

1

INTEGRAL VISION, INC.
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

2

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

INTEGRAL VISION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

3

INTEGRAL VISION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Balance Sheets – Continued

4

INTEGRAL VISION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

5

INTEGRAL VISION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statements of Operations

6

INTEGRAL VISION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

7

INTEGRAL VISION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

8

INTEGRAL VISION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Note A — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Business

Integral Vision, Inc. (or the “Company”) develops, manufactures and markets microprocessor-based process monitoring and control systems for use in industrial manufacturing environments. The principle application for the Company’s products is optical display inspection (“machine vision products”). The Company’s product offerings include LCI-Professional, SharpEye, ChromaSee, and Lifetime Tester. The Company’s products are generally sold as capital goods. Depending on the application, machine vision systems have an indefinite life. Machine vision applications are more likely to require replacement due to possible technological obsolescence rather than physical wear.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its 100% owned subsidiary: Integral Vision LTD, United Kingdom. Upon consolidation, all significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2004. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Integral Vision’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Estimates also affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Translation of Foreign Currencies

The financial statements of Integral Vision LTD are translated into United States dollar equivalents at exchange rates as follows: balance sheet accounts at year-end rates; income statement accounts at average exchange rates for the year. Transaction gains and losses are reflected in net earnings and are not significant.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts have been reclassified in prior periods’ presentations to conform to the current year’s presentation.

9

Accounts Receivable

Trade accounts receivable primarily represent amounts due from equipment manufacturers and end-users in North America, Asia and Europe. The Company maintains an allowance for the inability of our customers to make required payments. These estimates are based on historical data, the length of time the receivables are past due and other known factors.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost, which approximates actual cost determined on a first-in, first-out basis, or market. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, inventories consisted of the following (net of allowance of $666,000 at June 30, 2004 and $671,000 at December 31, 2003):

Inventories are recorded net of allowances for unsalable or obsolete raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods. We evaluate on a quarterly basis the status of our inventory to ensure the amount recorded in our financial statements reflects the lower of our cost or the value we expect to receive when we sell the inventory. This estimate is based on several factors, including the condition and salability of our inventory and the forecasted demand for the particular products incorporating these components. Based on current backlog and expected orders, we forecast the upcoming usage of current stock. We record reserves for obsolete and slow-moving parts ranging from 0% for active parts with sufficient forecasted demand up to 100% for excess parts with insufficient demand or obsolete parts. Amounts in work-in-process and finished goods inventory typically relate to firm orders and, therefore, are not subject to obsolescence risk.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

The Company reviews its long-lived assets, including property, equipment and intangibles, for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than the carrying amount of the asset.

Capitalized Computer Software Development Costs

Computer software development costs are capitalized after the establishment of technological feasibility of the related technology. These costs are amortized following general release of products based on current and estimated future revenue for each product with an annual minimum equal to the straight-line amortization over the remaining estimated economic life of the product (not to exceed 5 years). Management continually reviews the net realizable value of capitalized software costs. At the time that a determination is made that capitalized software amounts exceed the estimated net realizable value of amounts capitalized, any amounts in excess of the estimated realizable amounts are written off.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is stated on the basis of cost. Expenditures for normal repairs and maintenance are charged to operations as incurred.

Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets (buildings-40 years, other property and equipment-3 to 10 years).

10

Patents

Patents are stated at cost less accumulated amortization and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets (not to exceed 5 years).

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (“SAB 101”), Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the selling price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.

The Company accounts for certain product sales of its flat panel display inspection systems as multiple-element arrangements. If specific customer acceptance requirements are met, the Company recognizes revenue for a portion of the total contract price due and billable upon shipment, with the remainder recognized when it becomes due (generally upon acceptance). The Company recognizes all other product sales with customer acceptance provisions upon final customer acceptance. The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of spare parts upon shipment. Revenue from service contracts is recognized over the life of the contract. Revenue is reported net of sales commissions.

Concentrations of Credit and Other Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of accounts receivable. A significant portion of the Company’s customers are located in Asia, primarily Japan, Taiwan, and Korea, and in Europe. Therefore, the Company’s sales to these countries may be adversely affected by the overall health of these economies, including the effects of currency exchange rate fluctuations and political risks. The Company generally does not require collateral for most of its trade accounts receivable. For sales to some of its customers in certain geographic regions, the Company requires letters of credit. Substantially all of the Company’s revenue is invoiced in U.S. dollars. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, sales to three of the Company’s customers represented $143,000 of the Company’s total revenue of $170,000 for the period. The Company believes its credit evaluation and monitoring mitigates its credit risk.

Advertising

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising costs were approximately $2,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and $5,000 for the comparable 2003 period.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (“FAS 109”), which requires the use of the liability method in accounting for income taxes. Under FAS 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided for net deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that these items will either expire before the Company is able to realize their benefit, or future deductibility is uncertain.

Fair Value Disclosure

The carrying amounts of certain financial instruments such as cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and long-term debt approximate their fair values. The fair value of the long-term financial instruments is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis and the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of arrangements.

Contingencies and Litigation

The Company makes an assessment of the probability of an adverse judgment resulting from current and threatened litigation. The Company accrues the cost of an adverse judgment if, in management’s estimation, an adverse settlement is probable and management can reasonably estimate the ultimate cost of such litigation. The Company has made no such accruals at June 30, 2004.

11

Stock Options and Warrants

The Company has elected to follow APB No. 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. Under APB 25, because the exercise price of the Company’s employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized. The Company has elected to adopt only the disclosure provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, as amended by FASB Statement No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure.”

In May 2004, the Company’s stockholders approved a new stock option plan to authorize shares on which qualified and nonqualified options may be granted for the purchase of up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company.

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approves option grants. The option price is the market price on the date of the grant, vesting generally occurs after one year and the expiration occurs ten years from the date of the grant. In May 2004, stock options for the purchase of 124,000 common shares were granted with an exercise price of $1.71 per share, which was the market price at the close of trading on the grant date. In May 2003, stock options for the purchase of 180,000 common shares were granted with an exercise price equal to the market price at the close of trading on the grant dates. Options for the purchase of 115,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were granted with an exercise price of $.15 per share and options on 65,000 shares were granted with an exercise price of $.16 per share. At June 30, 2004, there were options outstanding to purchase 943,000 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $.10 to $9.25 per share.

Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by FAS 123 and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options granted subsequent to September 30, 1995 under the fair value method of FAS 123. The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options’ vesting period. The following table presents net loss and basic and diluted loss per common share, had the Company elected to recognize compensation cost based on the fair value at the grant dates for stock option awards, consistent with the method prescribed by SFAS 123, as amended by SFAS 148:

12

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s employee stock option plan has characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of such Company options.

Under the terms of the Company’s Note and Warrant Purchase agreement, as amended, the Company could issue up to $5.5 million of senior debentures, which consists of Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3 Notes. Class 2 Notes are working capital notes, are secured by accounts receivable of the Company, and are subordinated to the Class 1 Notes issued prior to April 16, 2002. In September 2003, the holders of all of the then outstanding Class 2 Notes agreed to modify the maturity dates of those Notes to April 30, 2004. In December 2003, certain of the Class 2 Notes were amended to have maturity dates of May 31, 2004. The purchasers of the Class 2 Notes receive warrants for the purchase of the Company’s common stock when the Note is repaid. Class 2 Warrants entitle the holder to purchase one share of Common Stock for each $1 in value of the Class 2 Note multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days such Class 2 note is outstanding and the denominator of which is 365, at a specified price which shall be approximately 150% of the recent fair market value of the Common Stock as of the date of the issuance of the Class 2 Note. Based on their respective maturity dates, the number of common shares that could be purchased with Class 2 warrants is estimated to be 840,000. In August 2003, the holders of those Notes agreed to a modification to the Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement that created a new Class 3 Note which is convertible into Integral Vision, Inc. common stock at a conversion rate set by the Company’s board of directors at the date of issuance. Class 1 Notes issued have maturities of up to four years, an interest rate of 10%, and the purchasers of the Notes receive warrants for the purchase of the Company’s common stock. The value assigned to warrants is included in additional paid-in capital and the discount is amortized over the life of the note. Additionally, the directors will determine the conversion rate at the date of issuance, subject to change in the event additional shares are issued in the future. In March 2004, the holders of the Class 1 and Class 2 Notes agreed to an additional modification to the Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement that increased the maximum amount of the Notes outstanding to $5.5 million. The maturity date on substantially all of the then outstanding Class 2 Notes was extended to December 31, 2005. Principal and interest due on those Class 2 notes on December 31, 2005 is projected to be approximately $1.2 million. The terms of the Class 1 Notes were changed such that all accrued interest would be due on June 30, 2004. Additionally, the first principal payments on the Class 1 Notes would be due on June 30, 2004. However, the amended Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement provides that, as a result of the Company’s shareholders’ approval of management’s proposal to increase the Company’s authorized stock to 31,000,000 shares at the Company’s annual meeting of its shareholders that was held on May 6, 2004, the following has occurred:

On the modification date, the market price of the Company’s common stock was approximately $1.50 per share. The Board considered the $0.75 conversion price was justified given the concessions received in connection with the debt, the fact that the shares are restricted, and other factors.

13

During the six month period ended June 30, 2004, $575,000 of the Class 2 Notes and $478,000 of the Class 3 Notes were placed. Additionally, Warren, Cameron, Asciutto, & Blackmer, P.C. (the Company’s corporate counsel), agreed to convert $250,000 of its $354,000 note payable into a Class 3 Note. The remaining $104,000 was repaid in June 2004. Also during the period, certain holders of Class 1 Notes exercised their warrants to purchase 1,540,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.25 per share, the proceeds of which were used to repay the face value of the respective Class 1 Notes. Mr. Drake exercised his warrants to purchase 1,890,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.25 per share, the proceeds of which were used to repay the face value of the his Class 1 Notes. Maxco, Inc. exercised its warrants to purchase 240,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.25 per share, the proceeds of which were used to repay the face value of its Class 1 Note. Max A. Coon (a director of the Company) exercised his warrants to purchase 270,000 and 60,737 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.25 and $0.75 per share, respectively, the proceeds of which were used to repay the face value of the his Class 1 and Class 3 Notes. At June 30, 2004, a total of $1,140,000 of the Class 1 Notes, $1,237,000 of the Class 2 Notes, and $1,355,326 of the Class 3 Notes were outstanding.

In connection with the private placement of $7.0 million of debentures in 1997, which were retired in 1999, the Company issued warrants for the purchase of 1,400,000 Integral Vision common shares at $6.86 per share through June 30, 2005, all of which were outstanding at June 30, 2004. Pursuant to the 1997 Note and Warrant Purchase agreement, these warrants have been re-priced based on subsequent warrant issues. At June 30, 2004, the holders of these warrants had the right to purchase up to 3,662,449 shares of the Company’s common stock at $2.62 per share.

During the six months ended June 30, 2004 employee stock options to purchase 179,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at prices ranging from $0.10 to $0.24 per share were exercised, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $23,000.

A summary of the outstanding warrants and options at June 30, 2004 is as follows:

Comprehensive Income

The Company displays components of accumulated comprehensive income (loss), if any, in the Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit.

Note B — Sale of Welding Controls Division

The Company incurred both Federal and State income tax liabilities as a result of the sale of the assets of its Welding Controls division in 1999. The Company paid approximately $90,000 for its 1999 alternative minimum tax liability, which resulted primarily from the gain on the sale of the Welding Controls Division. This amount was refunded to the Company in 2002. Additionally, the Company incurred a Michigan Single Business Tax (SBT) liability of approximately $120,000 for the 1999 tax year as a result of the transaction. At June 30, 2004, this liability was not yet paid in full and was included in accrued state income taxes in the consolidated balance sheet. Including interest and penalties, approximately $131,000 was outstanding at June 30, 2004 for this obligation, which is included in accrued state income taxes in the consolidated balance sheet. The Company is making monthly payments of approximately $6,300 to the taxing authority.

14

The acquiring company also assumed a liability to Square D in the amount of $1.8 million in accordance with the purchase agreement. This liability resulted from the settlement of patent litigation in 1994. The settlement required payments of $300,000 per year for ten years. In the event the acquiring company fails to make the required payments, Integral Vision may be obligated for those amounts due. As of June 30, 2004, no notifications have been made that the Company is obligated for any payments not made and the final payment is due in October 2005.

Note C — Long-Term Debt and Other Financing Arrangements

At June 30, 2004, the Company had a long term note payable to Maxco, Inc. (a 15% owner of the Company) of approximately $106,000 with an interest rate of prime plus 0.5%. This note matures in July 2005.

A summary of the Company’s debt obligations is as follows:

For further discussion regarding the Company’s obligations, see Note A — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Stock Options and Warrants.

Note D — Loss per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per share:

Warrants and options outstanding were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share because the inclusion of these options would have an antidilutive effect. For additional disclosures regarding stock options and warrants see Note A.

15

Note E — Sale of Optical Disc Inspection Technology

On September 9, 2002, DaTARIUS Technologies Inc., a subsidiary of global test equipment manufacturer DaTARIUS Technologies GmbH, purchased Integral Vision’s assets related to inspection systems for the optical disc industry, including the names “Automatic Inspection Systems” and “AID.” The sale included Integral Visions optical disc scanner products as well as its range of print and identification code products used to inspect the printing stage of disc manufacture. The consideration the Company received for the technology consisted of a non-refundable $100,000 advanced minimum royalty payment in addition to future royalties. The Company received approximately $54,000 in royalties in 2003 and expects to receive additional royalties in excess of $60,000 a year for the next two years. Additionally, the Company received $25,000 from the sale of equipment to DaTARIUS.

Note F — Related Party Transactions

During the period ended June 30, 2004, Mr. Charles Drake, the Company’s chairman, exercised warrants to purchase 1,890,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.25 per share in exchange for retiring various Class 1 Notes in the amount of $472,500.

Mr. Arthur Harmala, the Company’s Vice President of Marketing, has voluntarily deferred approximately $4,000 of his wages as of June 30, 2004. This amount is included in accrued compensation and related costs in the consolidated balance sheet.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2004, Maxco, Inc., a 15% owner of the Company, exercised warrants to purchase 240,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.25 per share in exchange for retiring a portion of a Class 1 Note in the amount of $60,000.

Maxco, Inc. advanced the Company approximately $139,000 in 2001 to permit the Company to meet its obligations. In March 2004, the parties reached an agreement on a new note that extended the maturity date to July 1, 2005. Additionally, Maxco provides consulting services to the Company. These services include assistance with financial statement preparation, compliance with governmental filing requirements, and assistance with certain financing arrangements. The Company has not recorded any charge for these services to date. For future services the Company may record charges, if and when, management, Maxco, and the Independent Directors determine the value of such services on an ongoing basis.

Warren, Cameron, Asciutto, & Blackmer, P.C. (the Company’s corporate counsel), agreed to convert $250,000 of its $354,000 note payable into a Class 3 Note. The remaining $104,000 was repaid in June 2004.

Note G — Income Taxes

The Company establishes valuation allowances in accordance with the provisions of FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” The Company continually reviews realizability of deferred tax assets and recognizes these benefits only as reassessment indicates that it is more likely than not that the benefits will be realized.

Note H — Going Concern Matters

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the financial statements, the Company has incurred losses from operations in the current and prior year six month periods of $1.4 million and $850,000, respectively. Further, during the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, the Company incurred losses from continuing operations of $1.9 million, $2.2 million, $8.1 million, respectively. The continuing losses, in addition to working capital deficiencies, recurring reductions in product sales, and cash flow deficiencies, among other factors, indicate that the Company may be unable to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations on a timely basis, to obtain additional

16

financing as may be required, and ultimately to attain profitability. Additionally, at June 30, 2004, approximately half of the Company’s $320,000 in trade accounts payable was overdue. Subsequent to June 30, 2004, approximately $220,000 of the total balance was paid. The Company also has an estimated $351,000 in amounts owed to certain regulatory agencies. The Company is making monthly payments of approximately $6,300 to one of the regulatory agencies.

For further discussion regarding the Company’s obligations, see Note A-Summary of Significant Accounting Policies-Stock Options and Warrants.

Note I — Off Balance Sheet Risk

A claim has been made against the Company citing unpaid royalties totaling $107,000. Management does not believe that the Company will ultimately be found to be liable to the claimant.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, risks and uncertainties. Generally, the words “anticipate”, “expect”, “intend”, “believe” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. The information included in this Form 10-Q is as of the filing date with the Securities and Exchange Commission and future events or circumstances could differ significantly from the forward-looking statements included herein. Accordingly, we caution readers not to place undue reliance on such statements.

Overview

Integral Vision, Inc. (or the “Company”) develops, manufactures and markets microprocessor-based process monitoring and control systems for use in industrial manufacturing environments. The principle application for the Company’s products is optical display inspection (“machine vision products”). The Company’s product offerings include LCI-Professional, SharpEye, ChromaSee, and Lifetime Tester. The Company’s products are generally sold as capital goods. Depending on the application, machine vision systems have an indefinite life. Machine vision applications are more likely to require replacement due to possible technological obsolescence rather than physical wear.

LCI Professional — Integral Vision’s LCI-Professional product is used for inspection of LCD Displays as components or final assemblies. Applications include cell phones, car radios, pagers, electronic organizers and hand-held video games. Integral Vision’s display inspection systems are designed to detect two classes of defects: cosmetic and functional. Cosmetic defects do not affect the functionality of the display, but they cause user annoyance and reduce product value. Functional defects are flaws that cause the device to be inoperable or have a significant effect on functionality.

SharpEye — Integral Vision’s SharpEye product provides small Flat Panel Display (FPD) inspection for reflective, emissive and transmissive display technologies. SharpEye is designed for the detection of functional and cosmetic defects in LCOS, OLED, Poly OLED, DMD, EL, HTPS, LTPS, LCD and other emerging display technologies. These technologies are applied to consumer products such as camcorders, rear projection computer monitors, digital still cameras, HDTV, projectors, video headsets and video telephones. The core technology of SharpEye inspection algorithms is the ability to quantize data to the level of a single display pixel. SharpEye can be configured for production inspection or for display evaluation in a laboratory based on the equipment configuration selected.

ChromaSee — Integral Vision’s ChromaSee product, which was introduced in 2003, provides luminance, color matching and defect inspections for FPD displays. Defect detection includes functional (e.g. failed pixels, icons) and cosmetic (e.g. scratches) defects. ChromaSee integrates with production equipment to allow inline or offline testing. A configuration interface (Task Sequencer) uses a familiar “Tree View” representation of the inspection sequence flow. For deployment into production, the operator’s interface provides essential views of results, images and statistics for production floor personnel.

17

Lifetime Tester — Integral Vision’s Lifetime Tester product, which was introduced in 2003, evaluates changes in display luminance, color and other performance characteristics over time. The Lifetime Tester facilitates the process of comparing different display manufacturing processes and formulas by evaluating large numbers of samples side by side to determine their life characteristics. This allows design and process engineers to efficiently evaluate the effectiveness of proposed design and process changes off line prior to implementation.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 Compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2003

Net revenues decreased $51,000 (39.8%) to $77,000 in the second quarter of 2004 from $128,000 in the second quarter of 2003. The decrease in net revenue was primarily attributable to $43,000 of revenue from sales of the Company’s packaging applications in the second quarter of 2003; there were no such sales from that product line in the comparable 2004 period.

Costs of sales increased $38,000 (34.9%) to $147,000 (190.9% of sales) in the second quarter of 2004 compared to $109,000 (85.2% of sales) in the second quarter of 2003. This was primarily due to increased material purchases and other costs in anticipation of higher sales in the third quarter.

Marketing costs were comparable to the prior year.

General and administrative costs increased $66,000 (29.9%) to $287,000 in the second quarter of 2004 compared to $221,000 in the second quarter of 2003. This was primarily due to increased legal costs of $30,000 in the 2004 period. The remainder of the increase in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second quarter of 2003 was mainly attributable to an increase in employee related costs.

Engineering and development expenditures increased $77,000 (44.3%) to $251,000 in the second quarter of 2004 compared to $174,000 in the second quarter of 2003. Approximately $65,000 of this increase was attributable to engineering work done in anticipation of increased sales in the third quarter. The remainder of the increase in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second quarter of 2003 was mainly attributable to an increase in employee related costs.

Other income in the second quarter of 2003 includes $17,000 of royalty income received in connection with the 2002 sale by the Company of its optical disc inspection technology.

Interest expense increased $24,000 to $108,000 in the second quarter of 2004 compared to $84,000 in the second quarter of 2003. The increase is primarily attributable to the interest on Class 1 and Class 2 Notes that were placed subsequent to June 30, 2003 (see Note C to consolidated financial statements).

Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2003

Net revenues decreased $370,000 (68.5%) to $170,000 in 2004 from $540,000 in 2003. The decrease in net revenue was primarily attributable to $471,000 of revenue from sales of the Company’s flat panel display inspection products in 2003; there were only $82,000 in sales from that product line in the comparable 2004 period. Conversely, 2004 included $33,000 of additional revenue from packaging applications over the prior year. The Company’s work in process inventory increased during the six months ended June 30, 2004 as work proceeded on orders from a customer. The Company plans on reducing this inventory through shipments during the third quarter and expects revenue from such shipments to exceed $750,000.

Costs of sales decreased $121,000 (31.0%) to $269,000 (158.2% of sales) in 2004 compared to $390,000 (72.2% of sales) in 2003. This was primarily due to a decrease of $166,000 in material costs as a result of the lower sales of flat panel display inspection products in 2004. Offsetting this decrease were $57,000 in additional costs related to packaging applications in 2004.

Marketing costs increased $6,000 (5.5%) to $115,000 in 2004 compared to $109,000 in 2003. This was attributable to an increase in employee related costs.

18

General and administrative costs increased $98,000 (22.8%) to $527,000 in 2004 compared to $429,000 in 2003. This was primarily due to increased legal costs of $53,000 in 2004. The remainder of the increase in 2004 compared to 2003 was mainly attributable to an increase in employee related costs.

Engineering and development expenditures increased $84,000 (23.6%) to $440,000 in 2004 compared to $356,000 in 2003. Approximately $52,000 of this variance was attributable to engineering work done in anticipation of increased sales in the third quarter. The remainder of the increase in 2004 compared to 2003 was mainly attributable to an increase in employee related costs.

Other income in 2004 includes $29,000 of royalty income received in connection with the 2002 sale by the Company of its optical disc inspection technology. Other income in 2003 includes $18,000 for engineering fees and $21,000 of royalty income.

Interest expense increased $70,000 to $224,000 in 2004 compared to $154,000 in 2003. The increase is primarily attributable to the interest on Class 1 and Class 2 Notes that were placed subsequent to June 30, 2003 (see Note C to consolidated financial statements).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2004 used cash of approximately $1.7 million primarily due to the Company’s loss from operations of $1.4 million. Decreases in accounts receivable and other assets and an increase in payables generated cash of $208,000 while increases in inventory used $716,000. The Company’s work in process inventory increased during the six months ended June 30, 2004 as work proceeded on orders from a customer. The Company plans on reducing this inventory through shipments during the third quarter and expects revenue from such shipments to exceed $750,000.

The Company investing activities included primarily the purchase of approximately $11,000 of equipment in 2004.

The Company’s financing activities included proceeds of $1.5 million from the issuance of restricted common stock. These shares cannot be transferred without registration or pursuant to an applicable exemption from registration (see Part II Item 2). The Company received $575,000 and $478,000 from the sale of Class 2 Notes and Class 3 Notes, respectively. The Company made principal payments of approximately $60,000 on its Class 2 Notes in the period. The Company made principal payments of approximately $137,000 on other long term notes in the period. Additionally, employee stock options were exercised during the period generating approximately $23,000.

The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations on a timely basis, to obtain additional financing as may be required, and ultimately to attain profitability. Additionally, at June 30, 2004, approximately half of the Company’s $320,000 in trade accounts payable was overdue. Subsequent to June 30, 2004, approximately $220,000 of the total balance was paid. The Company also has an estimated $351,000 in amounts owed to certain regulatory agencies. The Company is making monthly payments of approximately $6,300 to one of the regulatory agencies.

For further discussion regarding the Company’s obligations, see Note A—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Stock Options and Warrants.

Management’s Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The accounting policies discussed below are considered by management to be the most important to an understanding of our financial statements, because their application places the most significant demands on management’s judgment and estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Our assumptions and estimates were based on the facts and circumstances known at June 30, 2004, future events rarely develop exactly as forecast, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment. These policies are also described in Note A of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Form 10-Q.

19

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (“SAB 101”), Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the selling price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.

The Company accounts for certain product sales of its flat panel display inspection systems as multiple-element arrangements. If specific customer acceptance requirements are met, the Company recognizes revenue for a portion of the total contract price due and billable upon shipment, with the remainder recognized when it becomes due (generally upon acceptance). The Company recognizes all other product sales with customer acceptance provisions upon final customer acceptance. The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of spare parts upon shipment. Revenue from service contracts is recognized over the life of the contract. Revenue is reported net of sales commissions.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost, which approximates actual cost determined on a first-in, first-out basis, or market. Inventories are recorded net of allowances for unsalable or obsolete raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods. We evaluate on a quarterly basis the status of our inventory to ensure the amount recorded in our financial statements reflects the lower of our cost or the value we expect to receive when we sell the inventory. This estimate is based on several factors, including the condition and salability of our inventory and the forecasted demand for the particular products incorporating these components. Based on current backlog and expected orders, we forecast the upcoming usage of current stock. We record reserves for obsolete and slow-moving parts ranging from 0% for active parts with sufficient forecasted demand up to 100% for excess parts with insufficient demand or obsolete parts. Amounts in work-in-process and finished goods inventory typically relate to firm orders and, therefore, are not subject to obsolescence risk.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

The Company reviews its long-lived assets, including property, equipment and intangibles, for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than the carrying amount of the asset.

Contingencies and Litigation

The Company makes an assessment of the probability of an adverse judgment resulting from current and threatened litigation. The Company accrues the cost of an adverse judgment if, in management’s estimation, an adverse settlement is probable and management can reasonably estimate the ultimate cost of such litigation. The Company has made no such accruals at June 30, 2004.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company is exposed to market risk stemming from changes in foreign exchange rates, interest rates and prices of inventory purchased for assembly into finished products. Changes in these factors could cause fluctuations in earnings and cash flows. In the normal course of business, exposure to interest rates is managed by fixing the interest rates on the Company’s long-term debt whenever possible. The Company does not generally enter into long-term purchase contracts but instead purchases inventory to fill specific sales contracts thereby minimizing risks with respect to inventory price fluctuations.

While sales are generally denominated in US dollars, from time to time the Company may denominate sales in the following additional currencies:

20

In management’s opinion, as the currencies of Western Europe and the UK are generally stable, there is no significant exposure to losses due to currency fluctuations. However, because the Yen has not been stable over the past several years, the Company does enter into forward sales contracts equal to the future amount of Yen to be received at the time the order is accepted. These hedging transactions are on an order by order basis and at no time are they speculative in nature. At June 30, 2004, the Company had no open positions and had no sales denominated in a foreign currency.

Item 4. Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Controls and Procedures

21

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

None

Item 2. Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

For a discussion regarding the Company’s notes and warrants, see Note A—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Stock Options and Warrants.

The notes and warrants referenced above were sold in private transactions exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. There are fifteen purchasers, some of whom have purchased on more than one occasion. Of these, three of the purchasers are related entities or insiders of the Company. Eleven of the purchasers are either a client, or relative of the principal, of one State of California registered investment advisor. To the best of the Company’s knowledge, all of the purchasers are either “accredited investors” as that term is defined in Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 or, either alone or with their purchaser representative, have such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that they are capable of evaluating the merits and risks of the investment.

During June 2004, the Company sold 1,223,000 shares of unregistered shares of its common stock at $1.23 per share in private transactions exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. The securities were sold to four investment firms, one of which purchased in excess of 800,000 shares.

These shares, and the shares to be issued pursuant to the notes and warrants discussed above, are restricted from being transferred without registration or pursuant to an exemption from registration. After one year, the shares could be sold in unsolicited broker transactions pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933 (“Rule 144”), which includes restrictions on the number of shares that may be sold in any three month period. For those holders who are not affiliates of the Company, after the restricted shares have been held for at least two years, many of the restrictions of Rule 144, including the restriction on the number of shares which may be sold, will no longer apply.

Under the terms of the Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement and the agreements for the sale of the restricted shares, the Company is obligated to use its best efforts to register the restricted shares and the shares issuable upon exercise of the notes and warrants by September 30, 2004. Such registration would eliminate the restrictions on transfer. The Company anticipates filing a registration statement to fulfill this obligation.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None

Item 5. Other Information

None

22

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

23

24

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

25

EXHIBIT INDEX