e10vk
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
Annual report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the transition period from to |
Commission File Number 0-9407
COMPEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Minnesota
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
41-0985318
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1811 Old Highway 8
New Brighton, Minnesota 55112-3493
(651) 631-0590
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Common Stock, $.10 par value per share
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulations S-K
is not herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive
proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act).Yes þ No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell Company (as defined
in Rule 126-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o No o
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates
computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and
asked price for such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrants most recently
completed second fiscal quarter. $58,362,325
The number of shares outstanding of each of the Companys classes of common stock, as of September
9, 2005, was: Common Stock, $.10 par value, 12,579,380 shares.
Documents incorporated by reference. Certain specified portions of the Companys definitive proxy
statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held November 17, 2005 are incorporated by
reference in response to Part III.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K contains a number of forward-looking statements where we indicate
that we anticipate, believe, expect or estimate or use similar words to indicate what might
happen in the future. These forward looking statements represent our expectations about future
events, including anticipated product introductions; changes in markets, customers and customer
order rates; changes in third party reimbursement rates; expenditures for research and development;
growth in revenue; taxation levels; and the effects of pricing decisions. When used in this 10-K,
the words anticipate, believe, expect, estimate and similar expressions are generally
intended to identify forward-looking statements. You should evaluate these forward-looking
statements in the context of a number of factors that may affect our financial condition and
results of operations, including the following:
|
|
|
We maintain a reserve against the revenue we record for sales allowances on the
contracted or negotiated sales and rental prices. Many third party reimbursement entities
maintain schedules of the amount of sales and rental rates for our medical products that
they will reimburse. Because it is difficult to collect from patients the excess of our
contract price over these scheduled rates, and because our acceptance of the payment from
the reimbursement entity in some cases constitutes acceptance of that rate for our sales or
rental price, we normally do not pursue collection of the excess. The rate schedules from
the various reimbursement entities vary and we do not know in advance the rates of
reimbursement for all of our products from all of the reimbursement entities that may cover
the patients that use our products. When we record revenue upon billing of a patient or
health care provider, we offset the sales and rental prices, before recording it as
revenue, with an allowance based on our historical experience of a blended average rate
schedule of the reimbursement entities, weighting our current experience with known rates
from larger entities. Nevertheless, to the extent there is a shift in the reimbursement
entities that pay for sales or rentals of our products, or to the extent the reimbursement
rate schedules of third party reimbursement entities change, our allowance may be
inaccurate and we may be required to record additional allowances, resulting in a reduction
in our revenue, with a corresponding reduction in net revenue and income. |
|
|
|
|
Like many medical device companies that rely on third party reimbursement entities for
payment, we have a large balance of uncollected accounts receivable. We also have a
reserve for the portion of those receivables that we estimate will not be collected based
on our historical experience. If we cannot collect an amount of receivables that is
consistent with historical collection rates, we might be required to increase our reserve
and charge off the portion of receivables we cannot collect. This additional provision
for uncollectible accounts could significantly impact our operating results. |
|
|
|
|
In the United States, our products are subject to reimbursement by private and public
healthcare reimbursement entities that generally impose strict rules on applications for
reimbursement. Changes in eligibility or requirements for reimbursement, or failure to
comply with reimbursement requirements, could cause a reduction in our income from
operations. |
|
|
|
|
Healthcare reform, the expansion of managed care organizations and buying groups, and
continued legislative pressure to control healthcare costs have all contributed to downward
pressure on reimbursement rates and the prices of our medical products. Under the Medicare
Modernization Act, Medicare is prohibited from increasing reimbursement rates for durable
medical equipment, such as our medical products, through 2008. Further, this Act requires
that Medicare commence a competitive bidding process for off-the-shelf products, such as
our TENS devices, in 2007. Although this process will not initially be nationwide and is
not binding on private reimbursement entities, we expect that Medicare and most
reimbursement entities will be inclined to adjust their rate schedules based on the bidding
results. Further, increasing healthcare costs has caused the formation of buying groups
that enter into preferred supplier arrangements with one or more manufacturers of medical
products in return for price discounts. If we are not able to obtain preferred supplier
commitments from major buying groups or retain those commitments that we currently have,
our sales and profitability could be adversely affected. |
2
|
|
|
The products we sell in our United States medical products business may only be sold on
physician prescription and, for most of those products where there is a government
sponsored payor, only if we receive detailed documentation from the physician indicating
the medical necessity of the product, together with forms which we must submit to the
paying agency. In most cases, the reimbursement agency, including Medicare, requires strict
adherence to the requirements of the form and the failure to properly obtain and maintain
the documentation can result in significant fines, penalties, and civil litigation. For
example, we were subject to a Medicare whistleblower suit that we settled in 2000 for
approximately $1.6 million. Although we believe we have implemented a compliance program
designed to detect errors in complying with these regulations, if our program fails, our
operations and results could be adversely affected. |
|
|
|
|
The clinical effectiveness of our electrotherapy products has periodically been
challenged and the effectiveness of electrotherapy products such as those offered by Compex
for fitness and health applications has sometimes been questioned. Publicity about the
effectiveness of electrotherapy for pain relief or other clinical applications and
continued questions about the effectiveness of electrotherapy for conditioning could
negatively impact revenue and income from operations. |
|
|
|
|
We maintain significant amounts of finished goods inventory on consignment at clinics
for distribution to patients. We may not be able to completely control losses of this
inventory and, if inventory losses are not consistent with historical experience, we might
be required to write off a portion of the carrying value of inventory. |
|
|
|
|
The manufacture of medical and consumer products, and the labeling of those products for
sale in the United States, requires compliance with quality assurance and labeling
regulations of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Although we believe our
manufacturing facilities and operations comply with these regulations, a failure to comply
could result in our inability to manufacture, refurbish, and sell products until compliance
is achieved. |
|
|
|
|
The marketing of our consumer products is subject to regulations and oversight by both
the FDA and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) relating to misleading advertising. The FTC
has commenced several enforcement actions against advertisers of abdominal belts during the
past few years based on unsubstantiated claims. Although we have attempted to limit the
claims made in our advertisements to matters that can be substantiated, if the FTC were to
disagree with our conclusions, it could enjoin our marketing of these products for a period
of time and impose fines and penalties. Any such actions would have a significant adverse
impact on our operations. |
|
|
|
|
We operate in both the medical device and consumer products markets, both of which are
subject to a significant amount of regulation that affects the way we can advertise our
products, sell our products, bill customers for our products and collect payment for our
products. |
|
|
|
|
We have not sold substantial volumes of consumer products in the United States, but
intend to devote significant resources to market consumer products for health and fitness
applications. The consumer market for electrical stimulation products is new and
developing, and our success in this market will depend on a number of factors, including: |
|
|
|
our ability to obtain clearance from the FDA and other regulatory authorities to
market the products for all relevant consumer applications; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain distribution rights with, and to obtain adequate quantities
of product from, the manufacturers of consumer products for which we serve as
distributors; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to establish consumer demand with a limited marketing budget; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to secure shelf space in the United States with significant retailers; and, |
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness of our products for their intended applications |
|
|
|
We market and sell several products manufactured by a number of different companies,
including abdominal belts and other garment-based consumer products, iontophoresis
products, traction devices, bone growth stimulation products, other orthopedic durable
medical equipment (DME) products, and electrodes. We generally have less control over the
quality and reliability of these third party products. If these products do not comply with
their specifications or otherwise fail to |
3
|
|
|
properly function, we may receive an increased amount of returns for which we are primarily
responsible, may be required to recall products, may suffer a decrease in product reputation
and goodwill in the marketplace, and may be unable to sell products currently on hand. Any
of these events could negatively impact our operations, particularly if the sale of these
third party products becomes a substantial part of our business. |
|
|
|
|
The terms of our third party distribution contracts, including our contracts for
Slendertone products, may be altered if we do not meet the contract requirements. Although
we believe we are currently in compliance with those contracts, we cannot be certain that
we will be able to continue to sell product at the rates these contracts require. To
concentrate our resource on our core products in Europe, we have elected to discontinue
distribution of Slendertone in those markets. In the United States, our contract for the
sale of Slendertone product in the United States currently calls for minimum purchases
which we have budgeted for in the coming year. Although we believe that we will able to
renegotiate this contract if we do not meet these minimums, we cannot be certain that we
will be able to do so on similar terms, or at all. |
|
|
|
|
Approximately 33% of our revenue for the year ended June 30, 2005 was generated by
Compex SA, a subsidiary headquartered in Switzerland that does business primarily in
Europe. There are risks in doing business in international markets which could adversely
affect our business, including: |
|
|
|
regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
|
export restrictions and controls, tariffs and other trade barriers; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing international operations; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates; |
|
|
|
|
reduced protection for intellectual property rights; |
|
|
|
|
changes in political and economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
seasonal reductions in business activity; and |
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax assessments. |
|
|
|
Although our products were among the first products sold for muscle toning and
conditioning in Europe, the consumer markets for these products in some of the geographies
have matured, and we have increasingly become subject to competition from lower cost
products. Although we believe that we have maintained our reputation as the manufacturer
of the highest quality products in these markets, the introduction and sale of lower cost
products has caused some erosion of our sales volumes in these geographies and pressure on
the price we charge for our products. |
|
|
|
|
The revenue we have reported during the past three years, and to a lesser extent the
income we have reported, has benefited from the decreasing value of the dollar in Europe,
where Compex SA operates. Because we bill for and account for sales in Europe in local
currency, during periods in which U.S. currency is devalued, sales of the same number of
products at the same prices in Europe will result in our recording increasing sales revenue
after conversion to U.S. currency. Conversely, if U.S. currency increases in value
relative to the Euro and other European currencies in the future, we would report less
revenue and potentially less income even at times when our operations in Europe continued
to perform at historical levels. A large or rapid increase in the value of the dollar
relative to the Euro could have a significant adverse impact on our reported revenue. |
|
|
|
|
We have entered into a contract to perform private label OEM manufacturing. The
contract contains some minimum purchase requirements for the customer. If this customer
does not meet any more than the minimum purchase requirements, it may result in lower than
projected revenues and earnings in fiscal year 2006. |
4
PART I
Item 1. Business
General
Compex Technologies, Inc. designs and manufactures electrical stimulation products for pain
management, rehabilitation, fitness and sports performance enhancement. Our products are used in
clinical, home healthcare, sports and occupational medicine settings. We were incorporated as
Medical Devices, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, in 1972. In 1994, we changed our name to
Rehabilicare Inc. and in December 2002, we changed our name to Compex Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:
CMPX).
Our products are based on electrical stimulation technologies designed to improve health, wellness,
athletic performance, and fitness. More specifically, we design, manufacture, distribute, sell and
rent electrical stimulation products that use different modalities to deliver electrical current
through electrodes placed on the skin for pain management, rehabilitation, and edema reduction as
medical devices, and for sports performance enhancement and muscle toning as consumer products.
Our portfolio of products includes transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS),
interferential stimulation (IF), neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), pulsed direct current
stimulation (PDC), traction, and iontophoresis devices, accessories and supplies. Our medical
device product lines include pain management, rehabilitation, and edema reduction devices generally
used by, or under the direction of, physicians, nurses, and therapists. For the most part, our
products are sold under the Rehabilicare® name for prescription medical devices in the
United States. Within the last year, we introduced the Staodyn name for electrical stimulation
products that we import for distribution through our U.S. wholesale medical business. In Europe,
our medical devices are sold under the Compex® name. In some European countries, our
medical devices do not require a prescription and are sold over-the-counter for rehabilitation and
pain management. Our consumer product line is sold over-the-counter and is designed for sports
performance enhancement, fitness, and health and wellness. Our consumer products are sold under
the Compex® name in both Europe and the United States. We also distribute complementary
medical devices and consumer products manufactured by others under other name brands, such as
Slendertone.
In the fourth quarter of the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2005, we completed an acquisition that
will complement our U.S. medical product sales in the orthopedic market. In addition, the
acquisition provides us with the access to additional durable medical
equipment (DME) products that we will sell in the
orthopedic market and other healthcare markets that we operate in. We acquired all of the capital
stock of SpectraBrace, Ltd., a DME supplier of orthopedic products, for approximately $3.65
million. During fiscal 2006, we will work to consolidate and integrate the operations of
SpectraBrace into our US medical business.
Overall, sales of medical products in United States increased 15% during fiscal 2005. The sales in
our core medical products business in the U.S. continue to benefit from the rollout of the pain and
orthopedic physician distribution model, which we integrated from the acquisition of BMR Neurotech,
and the investment we have made to increase our direct sales staff.
In Europe, our sport and fitness line of consumer products began to receive increased competition
from lower priced products. We offset some of the effect of this competition by the introduction
of several new products and by reducing the prices of some of our existing products. Although our
sales increased in large part because of the declining strength of the dollar against the Euro, our
unit sales growth did not meet our expectations as a continued weak economy, competition for
over-the-counter sports products in some markets, and management changes in some markets affected
sales.
We continued to implement the
launch strategy for our U.S. consumer product business. In the
second half of fiscal 2005 we began testing a new infomercial advertising direct sales program
for the Slendertone products. The infomercial includes celebrities that we signed endorsement
contracts with during fiscal 2004, most notably Sarah Ferguson, Duchess of York to represent the
Slendertone products. The infomercial test generated solid results and we plan to expand the
advertising campaign during fiscal 2006. We continue to grow Slendertone products sales with
appearances on HSN (Home Shopping Network) and distribution at retail outlets such as GNC (General
Nutrition Centers). In fiscal year 2006, we expect to generate significantly more sales of
Slendertone belts as we continue to rollout our multi-channel distribution strategy.
5
Products
We offer a full line of medical and consumer electrical stimulation products for pain management,
rehabilitation, sports performance enhancement, fitness, and health and wellness. All of the
medical and consumer products that we manufacture are based upon electrical stimulation
technologies designed to deliver an electrical current to improve health, wellness, athletic
performance, and fitness.
We offer our Rehabilicare® and Staodyn medical devices primarily in the United States
for prescription home use. A different line of medical devices is sold primarily for clinical or
professional use under the Compex® name in Europe. In addition, Compex SA offers an
extensive line of products to consumers over-the-counter in Europe under the Compex®
name for sports, fitness training, and wellness. In the US consumer market, we currently offer our
FDA cleared Compex muscle stimulation products and some distributed Slendertone products.
U.S. MEDICAL DIVISION REHABILICARE
Our U.S. medical device operations continue to represent the largest component of our business,
generating $60.0 million or 62% of our net revenue in fiscal year 2005. Rehabilicares medical
devices consist of hand-held, portable, battery-powered electrical stimulators, which are connected
by wires to electrodes placed on the skin to deliver electrical current using different modalities
for pain management, rehabilitation, and edema reduction.
U.S. Medical Devices
Pain Management
We offer a wide variety of electrical stimulation products for acute and chronic pain management.
These include transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulators, interferential stimulators, and
iontophoresis devices.
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) Devices. TENS devices have been used as a
non-narcotic alternative to drug therapy for the relief of chronic and acute pain for over 25
years. These devices are most frequently used to treat persistent conditions such as neck and low
back pain. TENS has also been used in treating pain resulting from a variety of other conditions
including postoperative pain, tendonitis, and phantom limb pain. TENS devices generally reduce
pain during treatment and the effects can continue for an extended period of time after use. TENS
devices relieve pain without the undesirable side effects and physiological problems of prolonged
drug use, including addiction, depression, disorientation, nausea, and ulcers. In the United
States, our TENS devices include:
ProMax is our best selling, portable TENS device for the U.S. direct medical market. This
digital unit incorporates a large display screen and programming parameters and features
that can be customized for each patient. In addition, the ProMax includes two unique
treatment options; the SMP mode which produces a unique cycle to reduce the bodys ability
to build-up a tolerance to the pain management stimulation, and the SD mode which allows the
user to cycle stimulation between deep nerves and superficial nerves, while maintaining
output intensity to maximize pain relief and comfort.
Maxima® is our best selling, portable TENS device for the U.S. wholesale market. This
digital unit is a full featured, high powered alternative to the low cost, off-shore TENS
devices. The Maxima includes the unique SMP mode, although its output current is slightly
less than the ProMax.
NuWave® is a TENS device specifically designed for low back pain. This clinically proven
device uses a unique waveform to maximize pain relief while in use and it creates a
tremendous carry-over effect when the device is not in use. NuWaves simple three-button
design makes it easy to use. This product is beneficial to patients with post-laminectomy or
peripheral neuralgic pain.
6
Staodyn Max2 and Max2 Elite are a line of low cost analog TENS devices imported for sale
by the wholesale division.
Interferential (IF) Stimulation Devices. Interferential offers similar pain management benefits as
standard TENS devices, although IF devices enable treatment to be localized to the pain sight. In
addition, IF devices create nearly 40 times more energy than do standard TENS devices. This medium
frequency generates deeper penetration into tissue for more effective pain control and increases
localized blood circulation to help decrease edema and increase range of motion. We distribute
fewer IF devices than TENS devices, although the IF devices generate higher reimbursement revenues
on a per unit basis. In the United States, we offer the following IF devices:
IF3Wave is our new hand-held, portable interferential device that includes
NMES and PDC modalities. This combination device has a digital interface and includes palm
pilot-like menu software for clinician and patient interaction. In addition, this device
captures patient usage information and has remote site data downloading capabilities.
Physicians can receive patient compliance reports to help them manage patient care paths.
With three modalities in one device, physicians and physical therapists can rely on a single
medical device for pain management, rehabilitation, and edema reduction.
IF II is a hand-held, portable, analog interferential device. Until the introduction
of the IF3Wave, the IF II was the primary product we emphasized in the physician market. We
expect to begin phasing out the IF II device during fiscal 2006.
Rehabilitation and Edema Reduction
We offer a wide variety of hand-held, portable electrical stimulation devices for rehabilitation.
The modalities generally considered for rehabilitation and edema reduction, include neuromuscular
electrical stimulation devices and pulsed direct current devices. Some devices incorporate
multiple modalities, referred to as combination devices, to accommodate a patients needs through
the rehabilitation cycle.
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) Devices are designed to accelerate recovery and
function in diseased or injured muscles. NMES effectively produces controlled muscle contractions,
which assist in increasing the strength of muscle tissue and the range of motion of a joint. NMES
is used both pre-operatively and postoperatively for muscle re-education, relaxation of muscle
spasms and edema reduction. In the United States, our NMES devices include:
EMS+2 is our best selling NMES device. It combines two modes; AC Mode and DC Mode. The AC
Mode is typically selected when treating large muscles or large muscle groups for increasing
or maintaining range of motion, re-educating muscles for increased function and prevention
of disuse atrophy. Whereas, the DC mode either dilates or constricts the vessels, thereby
controlling local blood flow to reduce edema and increase range of motion, thus reducing
pain and muscle spasms. The EMS+2 is typically recommended for treatments following joint
surgeries and nerve injuries, or for various vascular diseases.
Ortho DX is designed for pre-surgical and post-surgical rehabilitation. This
patented device combines both the NMES and PDC modalities that can be used simultaneously
during a treatment session. Patients benefit by minimizing swelling and pain while
maximizing muscle rehabilitation, which can accelerate recovery time. In addition, range of
motion, isometric, isotonic and functional exercises can be completed while using the
device. The innovative Ortho DX device allows users to work harder with less
pain, resulting in accelerated and better muscle rehabilitation.
NT2000 combines two modalities, NMES and TENS, to increase muscle strength, prevent disuse
atrophy and reduce chronic or acute pain. We acquired the U.S. distribution rights for this
product from BMR Neurotech, Inc. The NT2000 offers ten preset programs, with the capability
of
7
customizing two programs. The device has a compliance monitor that provides physicians with
patient usage information that can be used to improve management of patient care paths.
Pulsed Direct Current (PDC) Devices. PDC devices reduce swelling, influence local blood
circulation and increase range of motion. PDC is typically used postoperatively and for
traumatic injuries. In the United States, our PDC devices include:
GV II is a high voltage device used primarily to increase blood flow and reduce
edema following trauma due to surgery or injuries, including sprains and strains.
This device may also be used to reduce muscle spasm, trigger point therapy and pain
control.
SPORTX® is a versatile, dual purpose device that is particularly popular
with orthopedic surgeons, physical therapists and athletic trainers for
professional, collegiate, and other organized athletic teams. The SporTX features
both PDC and TENS modalities. These help reduce swelling and stiffness to improve
range of motion, while increasing circulation to bring nutrient-rich blood to the
injured area to accelerate the natural healing process. In addition, the device can
reduce chronic and acute pain.
Iontophoresis. Iontophoresis involves the use of mild electrical current to deliver medication
(usually an anti-inflammatory or a local anesthesia) through an electrode into tissue.
Iontophoresis is noninvasive and does not require the use of a needle or ingestion of medication.
In the United States, we distribute an iontophoretic drug delivery systems manufactured by IOMED
Corporation under the IOMED brand name to physicians, physical therapists, and other healthcare
specialists treating acute and chronic pain.
Cervical and Lumbar Traction Devices. We distribute home-use traction devices in the United
States. The traction devices are manufactured by the Saunders Group, Inc. and are marketed under
The Saunders Cervical Hometrac® and The Saunders Lumbar Hometrac® brand names. We
distribute the traction devices through physicians, physical therapists, and other healthcare
specialists treating neck and back pain. These portable traction devices are a cost-effective
option to continuing clinical traction treatments outside the clinic or office setting.
Accessories and Supplies
In the United States, we sell various medical device accessories and supplies, including
self-adhesive, reusable, and disposable electrodes, lead wires, batteries, and AC power packs. We
purchase all of our accessories and supplies from outside vendors.
Distribution and Billing
We distribute our medical devices in the United States both on a direct basis to healthcare
providers and their patients and on a wholesale basis to home healthcare dealers. We focus on
direct rather than dealer sales and have a sales network of employee and independent sales
representatives to consign and sell our products. In the United States, our sales force has
approximately 137 sales and support personnel in the field calling on about 4,100 active accounts,
including physical and occupational therapists, orthopedic surgeons, pain specialists,
anesthesiologists, physiatrists, sports medicine physicians, and other healthcare providers. In
addition, we sell certain medical products on a nonexclusive basis to home healthcare and durable
medical equipment dealers, which amounted to approximately 5% of our revenue in fiscal year 2005.
For our direct rentals and sales of medical products in the United States, we make consignment
inventory available at treating clinics and other dispensing locations. When a treating clinician
or physician determines that a specific device is beneficial to a patient, a physicians
prescription is obtained, and the patient is trained in the use of the device. The product is then
taken home by the patient for in-home therapy. At the same time, the medical professional submits
medical documentation to us and we file a claim on behalf of the patient to their insurance company
or other third party payor. For rentals, the patient
8
returns the device to us in a prepaid mailer after the treatment period expires. If a product is to
be used by a patient for a long term basis quite often an insurance company will purchase the
product, rather than rent it. To conduct business in this manner, we maintain a significant
balance of inventory at clinics and provide telephone support (without charge) to patients in use
of the product.
We provide billing and support for our U.S. medical device business through our offices in Tampa,
Florida. These operations include (1) distribution support staff that provides next day service of
products and supplies to providers and patients; (2) billing and collecting staff that work
(without charge) with physicians, clinicians and reimbursement entities to ensure prompt and
accurate billing and collection of sales and rental fees for our products; (3) a telemarketing
sales staff that follows up with patients to ensure that they have adequate product and supplies to
meet their needs; and (4) patient care personnel that assist patients in the purchase and
reimbursement process. We also employ clinicians who communicate with patients by phone from a
clinical perspective and respond to calls from patients to ensure products are working and used
properly. This department then reports to the prescribing clinician, allowing the clinician to
contact the patient to alter therapy, as appropriate.
In most cases, the rental or purchase price for our medical products in the United States is paid
by an insurance company, health maintenance organization, or a governmental agency under Medicare,
Medicaid, workers compensation or other programs. These third party reimbursement agencies pay for
the use of our products only after receipt of documentation that they consider adequate and often
subject to specific reimbursement guidelines and limitations. We discuss some of these limitations
under the caption Reimbursement below. Because the payments from these reimbursement agencies
require submission, and often resubmission, of documentation, justification based on prescription
of the necessity of the product, and often negotiation with the reimbursement entity, payment for
sale or rental of our medical products normally takes between 60 and 120 days. Accordingly, we
maintain a large balance of accounts receivable and must carefully estimate the portion of those
receivables that are collectible.
We are not dependent upon any single customer for any significant portion of the sales of our
medical devices. As we indicate under the caption reimbursement below, however, we do receive
payment from several insurance companies and health maintenance organizations and if one of the
more significant of these third party payors changed or curtailed reimbursement for our products,
it would negatively impact our business.
Reimbursement
Governmental and other efforts to reduce healthcare spending have affected, and will continue to
affect, our operating results. The cost of a significant portion of medical care in the United
States is funded by government and private insurance programs, such as Medicare, Medicaid, health
maintenance organizations, and private insurers, including Blue Cross/Blue Shield plans.
Government imposed limits on reimbursement of hospitals and other healthcare providers have
significantly reduced their spending budgets. Under certain government insurance programs, a
healthcare provider is reimbursed a fixed sum for services rendered in treating a patient,
regardless of the actual charge for such treatment. Private and third party reimbursement plans
are also developing increasingly sophisticated methods of controlling healthcare costs through
redesign of benefits and exploration of more cost-effective methods of delivering healthcare. A
number of private reimbursement agencies and industry groups have formed purchasing groups that
negotiate favorable rates for the products they or their patients purchase or rent. In general,
these government and private cost-containment measures have caused healthcare providers to be more
selective in the purchase of medical products.
Under most third party reimbursement plans, the coverage of an item or service and the amount of
payment that will be made are separate decisions. Efforts to reduce or control healthcare spending
are likely to limit both the coverage of certain medical devices, especially newly approved
products, and the amount of payment that will be allowed. Restrictions on coverage and payment of
our products by third party payors could have an adverse impact on our operations. We attempt to
establish relationships with such payors to assure coverage of our products and make the timing and
extent of reimbursement more predictable.
9
Governmental payers have continued to focus on controlling the costs of healthcare. In February
2003, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Medicare carriers, the federal
agencies which determine Medicare reimbursement levels, implemented regulations providing authority
to decrease or increase Medicare part B payment amounts when the federal government believes the
existing payment amounts are either grossly excessive or grossly deficient. Further, on
December 8, 2003, the President signed into law the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and
Modernization Act of 2003, or Medicare Modernization Act. This legislation provides for revisions
to payment methodologies and other standards for durable medical equipment under the Medicare
program. First, beginning in 2004 and continuing through 2008, the payment amounts for durable
medical equipment will no longer be increased on an annual basis. Second, beginning in 2007, a
competitive bidding program that will apply to off-the-shelf non-Class III devices, including TENS
devices, will be phased in to replace the existing fee schedule payment methodology. The
competitive bidding program will begin in 2007 in ten high population metropolitan statistical
areas and in 2009 will be expanded to 80 metropolitan statistical areas (and additional areas
thereafter). Payments in regions not subject to competitive bidding may also be adjusted using
payment information from regions subject to competitive bidding. Third, supplier quality standards
are to be established which will be applied by independent accreditation organizations. Fourth,
clinical conditions for payment will be established for certain products. Although the amount of
business we do that is subject to Medicare reimbursement is small, we expect that many private
insurers and reimbursement agencies will base their reimbursement rates on the Medicare schedules.
In addition to establishing the rates of reimbursement, CMS and the agencies that administer
Medicare reimbursement require compliance with a detailed set of regulations and forms as a
prerequisite to reimbursement. Failure, or alleged failure, to comply with these regulations can
result in administrative action and civil action under the federal False Claims Act and similar
whistleblower statutes. When an entity is determined to have violated the False Claims Act, it
must pay three times the actual damages sustained by the government, plus mandatory civil penalties
of between $5,500 and $11,000 for each separate false claim. Suits filed under the False Claims
Act, known as qui tam actions, can be brought by any individual on behalf of the government and
such individuals (known as relators or, more commonly, as whistleblowers) may share in any
amounts paid by the entity to the government in fines or settlement. In addition, certain states
have enacted laws modeled after the federal False Claims Act. Qui tam actions have increased
significantly in recent years, causing greater numbers of healthcare companies to have to defend a
false claim action, pay fines or be excluded from the Medicare, Medicaid or other federal or state
healthcare programs as a result of an investigation arising out of such action. We were the
subject of a whistleblower suit in 1999 that we settled with the United States Government by
payment of $1,588,510. As part of this settlement, we also entered into a five-year corporate
integrity agreement with the Office of the Inspector General. The last four corporate integrity
agreement audits performed by an independent review organization have yielded positive findings and
minimal internal procedure revisions. It is a health care providers responsibility to formulate
policies, procedures, and practices that are tailored to its own operations and demands, and that
are comprehensive enough to ensure compliance with all applicable Federal health care program
requirements.
SPECTRABRACE, LTD.
In June, 2005, we acquired all of the capital stock of SpectraBrace, Ltd. SpectraBrace
headquarters are located in Louisville, Kentucky. SpectraBrace will broaden our distribution and
product sales to the orthopedic market. SpectraBrace generated approximately $4.0 million in sales
in calendar 2004. The SpectraBrace business model operates offices within orthopedic practices,
which are Medicare certified and staffed by certified athletic trainers. SpectraBrace is a full
line supplier of durable medical equipment (DME) products, which are routinely prescribed by orthopedic surgeons. Currently,
SpectraBrace operates 36 offices in 13 states. We believe SpectraBraces distribution model and
product line complements our U.S. medical business third party billing operations and national
insurance contracts.
EUROPEAN MEDICAL AND CONSUMER DIVISION COMPEX EUROPE
We
generated $31.8 million in revenue from our European operations during fiscal year 2005, as
compared to $33.1 million in 2004 and $26.5 in 2003. Because the regulatory requirements and the
10
markets differ substantially from the regulatory requirements and markets in the United States, we
sell a completely different line of medical, sport, fitness, health and wellness products
over-the-counter using the Compex brand name in Europe. In general, our European product range is
slightly larger and our products are more full-featured to provide a wide range of therapies,
including sports training, fitness and wellness modes, as well as neuromuscular stimulation, TENS,
and vascularization. We sell a broad line of products directly to sports and fitness enthusiasts
for various muscle training applications and also sell several products primarily for medical
applications. Whether the user is a professional or amateur athlete, a consumer interested in
general fitness, or a healthcare professional delivering muscle therapy or pain management, our
hand-held electrical stimulators allow users to customize the programs to maximize their
performance and comfort. With the exception of the Compex Sport and Fitness Trainer, these
products are not available for sale in the United States.
Although our products in Europe provide functions for many purposes, we group the products
primarily on the basis of their target uses. We have programmed our devices to provide stimulation
regimes designed to maximize their performance for each use. All of these products currently
provide up to four channels of stimulation and vary primarily in the programming of the stimulation
they provide, as well as their positioning and pricing in the marketplace.
Sports Products
These products are designed to assist the competitive athlete in increasing the maximum strength of
a muscle, developing muscular volume, increasing the explosive strength of muscles or improving the
capacity of muscle fibers to sustain effort over long periods of time. Growing out of our
groundbreaking Compex Sport product, our current products designed principally for these functions
include:
mi-Sport 500. Our first sport product to include our proprietary muscle intelligence (or mi)
technology, the mi-Sport 500 includes the features of our Sport 400 for the needs of the
professional athlete, as well as several additional massage and aesthetic shaping functions.
Our muscle intelligence technology utilizes a patented sensor that analyzes, through the
same electrodes as stimulation is provided, muscle conductivity and response both before and
during use and adjusts stimulation frequency and strength to provide the maximum benefit to
the user.
SPORT 400. The Sport 400 is targeted for the professional athlete or competitive amateur
and offers programs for endurance, strength training, resistance, recovery, explosive
strength, hypertrophy (muscle building), stretching, regeneration, and increased
capillarization, as well as all of the analgesic functions of a traditional TENS device and
the rehabilitation functions of a neuromuscular stimulator. This device is now being
replaced by the Sport Elite.
Energy. The Energy is a newer product directed to the serious amateur athlete who requires
many, but not all of the features of the Sport 400. It provides most of the endurance,
resistance and recovery programs of the Sport 400 but provides more limited selections for
body building and similar programs designed for professional athletes.
Fitness Products
Products in this category have been programmed to restore, improve or maintain a good physical
condition. They are intended to stimulate the muscle training required for different kinds of
physical exercises. Products in this category include:
mi-Fitness Trainer. The mi-Fitness Trainer is our most full-featured fitness product,
incorporating our patented muscle intelligence technology with programs designed to maximize
performance in jogging, stepping, cross training and other fitness training regimens and
provides programs for massage, body shaping and other aesthetics.
11
Top Fitness. The Top Fitness includes many of the features of the mi-Fitness Trainer but
without our muscle intelligence technology and has more limited functionality. This device
is now being replaced by the Full Fitness using the Energy platform.
Fitness Tens. Based again on our basic Compex Sport Model, but programmed to enhance fitness
regimes, the Fitness Tens is an entry level product for fitness training with limited pain
management features.
Wellness Products
A new category for Compex SA, our products in this category are designed to both improve body
aesthetics (shape, tone, appearance) and provide an improved feeling of well-being and fitness.
These products are targeted primarily to non-athletic markets for physiological appearance and
aesthetics. Products in this category include:
Body. The Compex Body is our newest wellness product and features a sleek attractive
design, easy to read browser screens and clear instructions. It is an extremely
user-friendly device that continues to achieve excellent results through 197 fitness and
wellness programs.
Medicompex. The Medicompex is a full featured product similar to the Top-Fitness and the
Sport 400, but with fewer fitness and sport functions that is designed for customers who
wish to improve aesthetics but also desire to have available the physical training and pain
management features we offer.
Professional Products
The professional category of products is marketed primarily to health care professionals and
professional physical trainers. Accordingly, these products emphasize the pain management,
vascularization, and neuromuscular rehabilitation features of our products. Products in this
category include:
mi-Theta Pro. The mi-Theta Pro extends our muscle intelligence technology into the
rehabilitation and pain management markets. Containing the same programming as the mi-Sport
500 and mi-Fitness Trainer, this device includes more extensive programming to provide
complete TENS features, vascularization and neuromuscular treatment that can be used by a
professional in isolation or in combination to treat a wide variety of issues.
Compex 2. Our most full featured and flexible product, the Compex 2 comes equipped with a
programming card that can be used to provide a range of treatment that includes
neuromuscular rehabilitation, TENS pain management, vascularization through IF, denervation,
iontophoresis, or incontinence treatment, as well as sport and fitness functions. It
includes two biofeedback monitors to allow the patient to maximize treatments.
Iontophoresis involves the use of mild electrical stimulation to deliver medication (usually
a local anesthesia) through an electrode into tissue. Iontophoresis is noninvasive and does
not require the use of a needle or ingestion of medication. In Europe, our Compex 2 and our
Micro+ Compex allow effective and safe iontophoresis treatments.
Theta-Stim. The Theta-Stim provides more limited programming in each of the major treatment
regimes (neuromuscular stimulation, TENS and vascularization).
Theta-Sound. The Theta-Sound is our proprietary ultrasound treatment device that
adjusts ultrasound output based on the thickness and character of the tissue being treated.
The principle underlying the medical use of ultrasound is based on the interaction
between ultrasound and various tissues through which it passes. During the transmission of
ultrasound, the sound energy is converted to thermal energy, especially in hard tissues such
as bones and tendons. In pulsed mode, the
12
thermal effect can be limited and the ultrasound produces an oscillation of molecules that
is used to treat inflammation, calcification, and blood accumulations. Ultrasound is also
used for iontophoresis. In Europe, we offer the Compex 0-SOUND which adds to the
clinical capabilities of a standard ultrasound device calibration of the intensity and form
of the ultrasound beam based on patient body composition to maximize therapeutic efficacy.
Until June 2005, we also offered, through a separate distribution arrangement with Bio-Medical
Research Limited (BMR), the same Slendertone products in Europe that we offered in the United
States. Because we did not meet our sales goals with these products in Europe, or the sales goals
set for us by BMR, we ceased distributing these products in Europe in June 2005.
Accessories and Supplies
In Europe, we sell various medical
device accessories and supplies, including self-adhesive,
reusable, and disposable electrodes, lead wires, batteries, and AC power packs. We purchase all
of our accessories and supplies from outside vendors.
Distribution and Marketing
In Europe, we market our consumer products through demonstrations at sport shops, attendance and
demonstrations at major athletic events and through product endorsements by Olympic and other top
athletes and teams. Over 60 athletes have endorsed our products in
Europe. We intend, during fiscal year 2006, to commence television marketing of our products in selected jurisdictions to combat
competition from lower cost products that have entered those markets.
Our consumer products are sold in Europe principally through employee and independent sales
representatives to sporting goods stores, specialty shops, pharmacies, and chain stores. Our
consumer products are, in general, purchased by retailers and distributors, and we normally receive
payment promptly, without any obligation to refund or return the purchase price.
Our consumer business in Europe has been cyclical, with the largest volume of sales occurring in
late Fall and in Spring and with seasonally low sales occurring during the traditional vacation
months of July and August of each year. Our consumer business, which depends to a large extent on
the amount of discretionary income available to retail consumers, is also impacted by economic
conditions and our European sales have been negatively impacted by the economic downturn during the
past several years. Further, during the past two years our European sales have been negatively
impacted by television marketing of lower priced and lower featured two channel fitness products
(as compared to our four channel products).
We market our professional products primarily to medical professionals and physical trainers in
Europe. In this segment they do require a physician prescription in Europe and a medical referral
is normally required for third party reimbursement. We market our professional line of products
for medical applications primarily in Switzerland, Italy, France, Belgium and Germany.
U.S. CONSUMER DIVISION COMPEX U.S.
In fiscal year 2004, the first full year during which we sold any consumer products in the United
States, we generated a total of $0.8 million of revenue from consumer product sales. Through
focused cable television infomercials, and the addition of several retail chains that carry our
Slendertone products, we increased sales of our consumer products in the United States during the
2005 fiscal year to $4.2 million.
13
Because of extensive FDA regulation, the market for electrical-stimulation products sold
over-the-counter for consumer applications in the United States is in the development stage. We
believe that we will be required to continue to apply significant resources prior to achieving
material revenue from these product lines.
Fitness and Wellness Products
In fiscal year 2005, we continued to expand the market for Slendertone® electrical stimulation
products under a distribution arrangement with Bio-Medical Research Limited, an Irish company. The
Slendertone products include:
Slendertone Flex®. The Slendertone Flex® is a neoprene abdominal belt that targets groups
of abdominal muscles which are difficult to tone with conventional exercise. It is an easy
to use product consisting of a flexible belt with an integrated, battery powered stimulation
unit and positioned electrodes. The FLEX has built-in memory and intelligent control that
automatically increases exercise levels through 4 programs with up to 99 intensity levels.
Slendertone GymBody®. The Slendertone GymBody® is similar to the Flex, but with a more
limited number of programs (2) and intensity ranges (3).
The Slendertone Bottom & Thigh®. The Slendertone Bottom & Thigh or Slendertone Shorts is a
pair of flexible neoprene shorts with an integrated stimulation unit and placed electrodes
that tones and tightens muscles in the buttocks and thighs. Like the Flex, it provides
exercise levels through 4 programs with up to 99 intensity levels.
During 2005, we continued to implement the launch strategy for our U.S. consumer product business,
which involves multiple channels of distribution: infomercial based direct sales, web-based, and
traditional retail outlets. Beginning in February of 2005, we began a more focused promotion of
Slendertone products on HSN as well as a number of regional cable networks through short
infomercials. We also began selling these products through stocking arrangements with several
retail chains, including General Nutrition Centers (GNC), in fiscal year 2005 and we will start
selling, early in fiscal year 2006, through Dunhams Sports and Academy Sports & Outdoors. The
infomercial features celebrities with which we signed endorsement contracts during fiscal year
2004, most notably Sarah Ferguson, Duchess of York for the Slendertone products. The infomercial
test generated solid results and we plan to expand the advertising campaign during fiscal year
2006. We continue to grow Slendertone products sales with frequent appearances on HSN (Home
Shopping Network) and distribution at retail outlets such as GNC and other sporting goods
retailers. In fiscal year 2006, we expect to generate significantly more sales of Slendertone
belts as we continue to rollout our multi-channel distribution strategy.
We acquired exclusive rights to distribute the Slendertone products in the United States in
February 2003 under a five year agreement, renewable for an additional five years, subject to
satisfaction of sales objectives. We are dependent on Bio-Medical Research Limited for manufacture
and supply of these products. Although the agreements provide us with manufacturing rights in the
event of a failure of supply, we might have difficulty establishing appropriate manufacturing
capability quickly.
Sports Products
The Compex Sport was cleared for sale over-the-counter to enhance muscle endurance, muscle
resistance, muscle strength, explosive muscle strength, muscle potentiation (or velocity), and
muscle recovery in the United States as a consumer product in April 2002. We continued to actively
market this product. During fiscal year 2005, we leveraged relationships with a number of
independent sales groups to market and sell the Compex Sport to specialty sport stores, such as
bike shops, running stores, and body building stores. We developed relationships with major
professional sports teams and several universities to support our marketing efforts as we continue
to expand the channels of distribution. We developed micro-teams to provide customer and sales
support at retail and professional events, such as
14
bicycle races, and triathlons. In fiscal year 2006, we will continue to focus on direct sales of
the current devices and potential new devices that meet the various needs of consumers. In fiscal
year 2005, Compex Sport did not contribute significantly to revenues in our U.S. consumer division.
Research and Development
Consistent with our business strategy of continuing to develop innovative brand name products and
improving the quality, cost and delivery of products, we maintain a research and development
department in Europe which engages in product development and the search for new applications. In
the U.S., we also maintain a development staff focused on continuing engineering for our pain
management and rehabilitation products. In Europe, our research and development staff focuses on
introducing new technology for the existing Compex products that improve performance and enhance
comfort and on developing new products that expand the treatment modalities. Expenditures for
research and development activities totaled approximately $2.5 million in 2005, $2.6 million in
2004 and $2.1 million in 2003 and were expensed as a part of operating expenses in the year
incurred.
Competition
Medical Devices
The electrical stimulation device market for pain management, rehabilitation, and edema reduction
in both the United States and Europe is relatively mature. Our devices compete in these markets
primarily on the basis of breadth of features, flexibility, portability and cost. Although there
are many companies that currently manufacture and distribute medical devices, we believe there are
only two primary competitors. For sales through dealers, as opposed to direct sales, there is also
substantial and increasing competition from distributors of low cost pain management and
rehabilitation devices. We compete in these markets primarily on the basis of the variety and
quality of our product offerings, marketing and distribution presence and service. The
electrotherapy market for modalities other than TENS and NMES, such as interferential current, and
pulsed direct current, is more fragmented and more difficult to define. We believe that our
ability to offer all of these modalities is in contrast to the focus of our competitors. We
further believe that there are no dominant competitors for these other modalities and that the
variety of modalities we offer, together with the distinctive features of our products, allow us to
compete favorably in this market.
Consumer
The consumer markets for sport and fitness, and health and wellness electrical stimulation products
are less developed and our products are, in many instances, the first products for these uses.
Although our consumer products are well known in six European countries and two models were
recently introduced into the United States, we expect new market entrants if we become more
successful. Most of our competitors in Europe tend to be smaller companies and the degree of
competition varies considerably by each individual country. Nevertheless, our consumer products
have been subject to increasing competition on the basis of price in a number of countries in
Europe, and particularly in Italy where a competitor has been successful in making substantial
sales of a less expensive, and less full-featured product, through a television campaign. We
compete in part by continually enhancing our products to offer new features and by reducing cost on
older products. We believe that our products also compete favorably on the basis of the quality,
technology, breadth, and the pricing of our product line, as well as our first-to-market advantage
in the U.S.
Manufacturing and Sources of Supply
Our U.S. medical devices are manufactured at our headquarters and manufacturing facility in New
Brighton, Minnesota. Manufacturing operations consist primarily of installing electronic
components and
15
materials onto printed circuit boards and assembling them into the final product. To maximize
quality and reliability and decrease size and weight, most of our products incorporate surface
mount technology and we use automated machinery that surface mounts components and through-hole
circuit board manufacturing.
Our European medical devices and consumer products incorporate components manufactured in other
countries and are contract manufactured. Although we attempt to inspect and test the products,
reliance on outside contractors reduces our control over quality and delivery schedules. If one of
these contractors failed to deliver quality products in a timely manner, our revenue and our
relationships with our customers could be negatively impacted.
The medical devices and consumer products that we manufacture or that are manufactured on our
behalf involve electromechanical assemblies and proprietary electronic circuitry. Most of the raw
materials and manufactured components used in our products are available from a number of different
suppliers. We maintain multiple sources of supply for most significant items and believe that
alternative sources could be developed, if required, for present single supply sources without a
material disruption of our operations. We are dependent on the manufacturers of the products we
distribute, including our iontophoresis products, Slendertone® products, traction devices, and
bracing products for supply and delivery.
Patents and Trademarks
Our patent strategy is to pursue patent protection on the unique features of our new products. We
believe that patent protection does offer a competitive advantage in the marketplace as we begin to
introduce products that combine various modalities and new technologies to improve user interface.
During the past few fiscal years, we have submitted several patent applications for approval, which
remain pending. One of the companies that we acquired maintained a more aggressive approach to
patent protection and the majority of its products are covered by more than 25 U.S. and Canadian
patents. In addition to patent protection, we rely on trade secrets, know-how and continuing
technological innovation to enhance our competitive position. We do, however, maintain trademark
registration for all of our branded product names.
We believe that we own or have the right to use all proprietary technology necessary to manufacture
and market our current products and those under development. We have no knowledge that we are
infringing upon any patents held by others.
Regulation
United States. The medical devices and consumer products that we manufacture and market in the
United States are subject to regulation by the Food and Drug Administration, in the United States.
Under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and regulations issued by the FDA under that act, we
must comply with controls that regulate the design, testing, manufacturing, packaging, and
marketing of our medical devices and consumer products. This system of regulation creates three
classifications for medical devices, each of which is subject to different levels of regulatory
control, with Class I being the least stringent and Class III being subject to the most control.
Class III devices, which are life supporting or life sustaining, or are of substantial importance
in preventing impairment of human health, are generally subject to a clinical evaluation program
before receiving pre-market approval from the FDA for commercial distribution. Class II devices
are subject in some cases to performance standards which are typically developed through the joint
efforts of the FDA and manufacturers, but they do not require clinical evaluation and pre-market
approval by the FDA but instead require a pre-market notification to the FDA and in most cases a
showing of substantial equivalence to an existing product under Section 510(k) of the Federal Food,
Drug and Cosmetic Act. Class I devices are subject only to general controls, such as compliance
with labeling and record-keeping regulations. We believe that all our currently marketed medical
products are Class II products under this classification system and that they do not require
clinical evaluation and pre-market approval prior to commercial distribution.
16
If a new medical device or consumer
product that is a Class I or Class II device is substantially equivalent to
a device that was in commercial distribution before 1976 and has been continuously marketed since
1976, pre-market approval requirements are satisfied through a 510(k) pre-market notification
submission under which the applicant provides product information supporting its claim of
substantial equivalence. This regulatory review typically takes from three to twelve months.
Because TENS and NMES devices were marketed prior to 1976, all design enhancements since 1976
requiring regulatory approval have been marketed under this less burdensome form of FDA procedure.
Further, the electrical stimulation products designed for fitness and toning that we market in the
United States for consumer applications, which are based on the same technology as NMES devices,
are also being marketed on the basis of 510(k) pre-market notifications. We will be required to
complete the regulatory review process of additional 510(k) submissions we have made for other
products that we intend to market over-the-counter. If we are not able to successfully complete
this process, the products may be limited to sale on physician prescription.
As a manufacturer of medical devices, we are also subject to regulation by the FDA of our design
and manufacturing processes and facilities under the FDAs
Quality System Regulation (QSR) requirements (Good
Manufacturing Practice) and other similar regulations. These regulations require that we design
and manufacture our products and maintain documents in a prescribed manner with respect to design,
manufacturing, testing and control activities. We believe that our procedures substantially
conform to the requirements of the FDA regulations.
The FDA and various state agencies also regulate the labeling of our medical devices, including any
promotional activities sponsored or marketing materials distributed by us or on our behalf. While
the FDA cannot prohibit a licensed health care professional from using a device for purposes other
than indicated in its labeling (i.e., an off-label use), if the FDA determines that a
manufacturer or seller is engaged in off-label marketing of a product subject to FDA regulations,
the FDA may take administrative, civil or criminal actions against the manufacturer or seller. The
regulations of state agencies with respect to the advertisement and promotion of medical devices
may be even more restrictive.
Medicare and many insurance programs are requiring their contracted providers to maintain full
accreditation by accrediting organizations. Accreditation requires DME companies to establish
performance standards for healthcare organizations that center around patient care. SpectraBrace
is nationally accredited by the Accreditation Commission of Health Care (ACHC). In fiscal year
2006, Rehabilicare will undertake an initiative to become fully certified.
International. In some of the foreign countries in which we market our medical products, we are
subject to regulations similar to those of the FDA, such as Germany, but in most of the countries
that are member states of the European Union, the regulations are substantially different. The
regulation of our products in Europe falls primarily within the European Economic Area, which
consists of the fifteen member states of the European Union as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein and
Norway. The legislative bodies of the European Union have adopted three directives in order to
harmonize national provisions regulating the design, manufacture, clinical trials, labeling and
adverse event reporting for medical devices: the Actives Implantables Directive, the Medical Device
Directive and the In-Vitro-Diagnostics Directive. The member states of the European Economic Area
have implemented the directives into their respective national law. Medical devices that comply
with the essential requirements of the national provisions and the directives will be entitled to
bear a CE marking. Unless an exemption applies, only medical devices which bear a CE marking may be
marketed within the European Economic Area. All of the products we manufacture and market for
medical applications in Europe bear the CE mark.
Post market surveillance of medical devices in the European Economic Area is generally conducted on
a country-by-country basis. The requirement within the member states of the European Economic Area
vary. In many countries, such as Germany, the national health or social security organizations
require our products to be qualified before they can be marketed as medical products with the
benefit of reimbursement eligibility. Due to the movement towards harmonization of standards in
the European Union and the expansion of the European Union, we expect a changing regulatory
environment in Europe characterized by a shift from a country-by-country regulatory system to a
European Union-wide single regulatory system.
17
Employees
We had approximately 553 employees as of June 30, 2005. This includes 442 employees in the U.S.,
primarily in New Brighton and Tampa, and 111 employees in Europe, primarily in Switzerland, Italy,
France, Spain and Germany.
Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining organization and we have never
experienced a work stoppage. We believe that our relations with employees generally have been
good.
Item 2. Properties
Our corporate headquarters are located
in a 30,000 square foot facility that we own in New Brighton, Minnesota,
a suburb of St. Paul, Minnesota. This facility houses all of our corporate activities including
administration, finance, sales and marketing, research and development, and manufacturing.
Because of
space constraints and a new wholesale contract that could generate
the need for more warehouse capacity we leased an additional 22,500
square foot warehouse facility near our corporate headquarters in
July 2005 for a term of 18 months. We also rent up to 3,000
square feet of additional warehouse space, on an as needed basis, in
Eagan, Minnesota to accommodate customs warehousing for imported goods.
We lease
26,000 square feet of office space in Tampa, Florida under a lease
expiring in 2012 for our direct sales, customer service, patient
support, and billing and collection activities. In May 2005, we
added 6,700 square feet of office space to this lease.
We
currently lease five facilities in Europe that total approximately
20,000 square feet of leased space. These leases range in duration
from one to three years and are all renewable.
We do not
believe that we will be required to add additional leasehold based on
currently planned operations during the 2006 fiscal year. We believe
that additional leasehold space is currently readily available in all
jurisdictions at favorable rates.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
In late January 2001, we were served with documents in connection with a product liability case
brought in the California Superior Court for Solano County. Through various proceedings, the
original complaint in this case was dismissed, without prejudice to re-file. The plaintiff filed a
new complaint in the same court in the Fall of 2004 and the case is now proceeding to discovery.
From time to time, we have also been a party to other claims, legal actions and complaints arising
in the ordinary course of our business. We do not believe that the resolution of such matters has
had or will have a material impact on our results of operations or financial position.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
There were no matters submitted to a vote of our shareholders during the quarter ended June 30,
2005.
18
PART II
Item 5. Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.
Our shares are traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol CMPX. The table below sets
forth the high and low closing sale prices of our common stock for the periods indicated, as quoted
by NASDAQ:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
Fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
8.250 |
|
|
$ |
4.680 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
12.000 |
|
|
|
7.600 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
10.100 |
|
|
|
7.550 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
9.200 |
|
|
|
5.030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
Fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
6.180 |
|
|
$ |
4.830 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
5.750 |
|
|
|
4.460 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
5.290 |
|
|
|
4.200 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
5.230 |
|
|
|
3.150 |
|
The last sale price reported by NASDAQ on September 6, 2005 was $3.70 per share. As of September
9, 2005, there were approximately 807 shareholders of record (not including beneficial holders) and
we estimate there were approximately 3,822 beneficial holders.
We have never declared or paid a cash dividend on our common stock. We presently intend to retain
all earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business and therefore do not anticipate
paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended June 30, |
|
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
Operating
results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
62,957,415 |
|
|
$ |
72,506,677 |
|
|
$ |
75,459,916 |
|
|
$ |
85,960,663 |
|
|
$ |
96,074,039 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
43,245,085 |
|
|
|
48,972,916 |
|
|
|
52,881,653 |
|
|
|
57,524,983 |
|
|
|
65,129,497 |
|
Net income |
|
|
3,319,989 |
|
|
|
4,942,010 |
|
|
|
4,961,555 |
|
|
|
3,050,367 |
|
|
|
2,551,281 |
|
|
Per diluted
common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
Financial data/other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
759,611 |
|
|
$ |
2,086,650 |
|
|
$ |
5,056,007 |
|
|
$ |
3,198,832 |
|
|
$ |
3,044,158 |
|
Working capital |
|
|
22,391,874 |
|
|
|
25,777,799 |
|
|
|
26,578,403 |
|
|
|
37,483,078 |
|
|
|
38,558,620 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
51,495,871 |
|
|
|
57,477,736 |
|
|
|
65,652,307 |
|
|
|
76,209,396 |
|
|
|
89,318,591 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
28,459,216 |
|
|
|
35,281,190 |
|
|
|
41,544,644 |
|
|
|
56,331,035 |
|
|
|
58,319,213 |
|
Long-term obligations |
|
|
10,433,542 |
|
|
|
6,455,209 |
|
|
|
1,217,268 |
|
|
|
2,436,200 |
|
|
|
4,127,019 |
|
|
19
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
Overview
We discuss the factors that significantly affected our financial results and our financial
condition in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations. For a more complete understanding of these factors, you should also review our
consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2005, our consolidated statements of
operations, statements of shareholders equity and statement of cash flows for the three years
ended June 30, 2005, and the notes to those financial statements. These financial statements and
the report of Ernst & Young LLP on our financial statements are included in Item 8 of this Form
10-K.
Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States. Nevertheless, the preparation of these financial statements requires that we
make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of our assets, liabilities, revenues
and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base these estimates
on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the
circumstances. It is our policy to evaluate and update these estimates on an ongoing basis. The
judgments and policies that we believe would have the most significant impact on the presentation
of our financial position and results are as follows:
Revenue Recognition and Provisions for Credit Allowances and Returns. We derive revenue in
the United States from medical products and accessories (United States Medical) sales and rentals
directly to patients and durable medical equipment dealers. We also derive revenue in the United
States from the sales of consumer products (United States Consumer) to distributors and directly to
consumers. In certain non-domestic markets (International), we derive revenue primarily from the
sales of consumer products to distributors and dealers.
United States Medical. The direct medical division involves providing products to
patients for rent or purchase, the sale of accessories to patients for the ongoing use of
such products and billing of the patients insurance provider for the products and
accessories. The wholesale medical division involves the sale of devices and medical
supplies primarily to clinics and medical equipment distributors. We recognize revenue in
accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, as amended by SAB No. 104, when
each of the following four conditions are met: 1) a contract or sales arrangement exists;
2) products have been shipped and title has transferred or services have been rendered; 3)
the price of the products or services is fixed or determinable; and 4) collectibility is
reasonably assured. Accordingly, we recognize direct medical revenue, both rental and
purchase, when products have been dispensed to the patient and the patients insurance has
been verified. For medical products that are sold from inventories consigned at clinic
locations, we recognize revenue when we receive notice that the product has been prescribed
and dispensed to the patient and the insurance has been verified or preauthorization has
been obtained from the insurance company, when required. We recognize wholesale medical
revenue when we ship our products to our wholesale customers. Revenue from the rental of
products to patients, which accounted for approximately 16% in fiscal 2005 and 17% of our
United States Medical revenue is recognized ratably based on the number of days remaining in
the month. Products on rental contracts are placed in fixed assets and depreciated over
their estimated useful life. All revenue is recognized net of estimated sales allowances
and returns.
We have established reserves to account for sales allowances, product returns and rental
credits. Sales allowances generally result from agreements with certain insurance providers
that permit reimbursement to us in amounts that are below the products invoice price. This
reserve is provided for by reducing gross revenue by a portion of the amount invoiced during
the relevant period. We estimate the amount of the reduction based upon historical
experience and consider the impact of new contract terms or modifications of existing arrangements with insurance providers. For
patient returns of products after purchase, the amount previously recorded as revenue in a
prior period is provided for
20
by reducing gross revenue in the current period. Rental
credits result when patients purchase products that they had previously rented. Many
insurance providers require patients to rent products for a period of one to three months
prior to purchase. If the patient has a long-term need for the product, the insurance
companies may authorize purchase of the product by these patients. When the product is
purchased, most insurance providers require that rental payments previously made on the
product be credited toward the purchase price. These rental credits are processed at the
same time the revenue is recorded on the sale of the product. A change in the percentage of
medical sales made pursuant to such contracts or a change in the number or type of products
that are returned could cause the level of these reserves to vary in the future.
United
States Consumer. The United States consumer products division involves the
sales of products to distributors, sport shops and direct sales to consumers. Revenue is
primarily recognized at the time of shipment to distributors, sport shops and direct sales
to consumers. A portion of our inventory is out on consignment with certain distributors
and the revenue is not recognized until the distributor sells the product to a consumer.
All revenue is recognized net of estimated sales allowances and returns. Because consumer
products are sold with a 30-day, money back guarantee, we have established reserves to
account for sales allowances and product returns in this division by estimating the amount
of the revenue reduction based upon the impact of new contract terms or modifications of
existing arrangements with distributors and upon our historical experience.
International. The international products division involves the sales to sports
shops, retail shops and healthcare providers. Revenue is recognized at the time of shipment
to dealers, distributors, sport shops and healthcare providers, direct sales to consumers or
upon notification from a healthcare provider that equipment has been prescribed and provided
to a patient and approved by the patient or his/her insurance provider. All revenue is
recognized net of estimated sales allowances and product returns. As in our U.S. consumer
division, we have established reserves for sales allowances, product returns and rental
credits in this division by estimating the amount of the revenue reduction based upon
historical experience and we consider the impact of new contract terms or modifications of
existing arrangements with distributors.
Reserve for Uncollectible Accounts Receivable. Managing our accounts receivable, particularly in
our U.S. medical division, represents one of our biggest business challenges. The process of
determining what products will be reimbursed by third party payors and the amounts that they will
reimburse is very complex and the reimbursement environment is constantly changing. We maintain a
reserve for uncollectible receivables and provide for additions to the reserve to account for the
risk of nonpayment. We set the amount of the reserve, and adjust the reserve at the end of each
reporting period, based on a number of factors, including historical rates of collection, and with
respect to our U.S. medical division, trends in the historical rates of collection and current
relationships and experience with insurance companies or other third party payors. If the rates of
collection of past-due receivables recorded for previous fiscal periods changes, or if there is a
trend in the rates of collection on those receivables, we may be required to change the rate at
which we provide for additions to the reserve. Such a change, even though small in absolute terms,
can significantly affect financial performance in current periods. A change in the rates of our
collection can result from a number of factors, including turnover in personnel, changes in the
reimbursement policies or practices of payors, or changes in industry rates of reimbursement.
Further, the reserve may be affected by significant charge-offs if a related group of receivables
become doubtful that were not previously anticipated to be doubtful. Accordingly, the provision
for uncollectible accounts receivable recorded in the income statement has fluctuated and may
continue to fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter as such trends change.
Carrying Value of Inventory. The US direct medical division maintains a large balance of
electrical stimulation devices on consignment at clinics and other healthcare providers that are
not under our control. In the course of our business, some of this product is lost. Although we
have the right in most cases to seek reimbursement for the lost product from our sales
representatives or the healthcare providers, in some instances we forego that right in order to
maintain favorable relationships. We maintain a reserve for the amount of consignment inventory
that may be lost based on our experience as developed through periodic field audits. We cannot be
certain that future rates of product loss will be consistent with our historical experience and we
could be required to increase the rate at which we provide for such lost inventory, thus adversely
affecting our operating results.
Carrying Value of Intangible Assets. We had a balance of intangible assets of approximately $18.3
million at June 30, 2005, most of which constituted goodwill and the value of acquired technology,
from several
21
acquisitions. We are required to charge-off the carrying value of identifiable
intangibles and related goodwill to the extent it may not be recoverable. We assess the impairment
of identifiable intangibles and related goodwill annually or whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important
that could trigger an impairment review include the following:
|
|
|
significant under-performance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; |
|
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or our overall business strategy; |
|
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends; and, |
|
|
|
|
significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period and our market
capitalization relative to net book value. |
If we determine that the carrying value of intangibles and related goodwill might not be
recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, we would
reduce the carrying value to its fair value.
Income Taxes. We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under this
method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized and measured using enacted tax rates in
effect for the year in which the differences are expected to be recognized. Valuation allowances
are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts that are more likely than
not to be realized.
Realization of the deferred tax assets, net of
deferred tax liabilities, is principally
dependent upon achievement of projected future taxable income offset
by deferred tax liabilities. We exercise significant judgment in
determining our provisions for income taxes, our deferred tax assets
and liabilities and our future taxable income for purposes of
assessing our ability to utilize any future tax benefit from our
deferred tax assets. Although we believe that our tax estimates are
reasonable, the ultimate tax determination involves significant
judgments that could become subject to examination by tax authorities
in the ordinary course of business. We periodically assess the
likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to
determine the impact on our deferred taxes and income tax liabilities
and the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. Changes in income
tax legislation, statutory income tax rates, or future taxable income
levels, among other things, could materially impact our valuation of
income tax assets and liabilities and could cause our income tax
provision to vary significantly among financial reporting periods.
22
Results of Operations
Our United States medical products division performed well during fiscal 2005, showing both
increased revenue and profitability, offset slightly by pressure on margins because of a change in
our product revenue mix. We also made progress in our United States consumer division revenues
during the year by leveraging our celebrity endorsement contracts. However, we devoted
considerable resources to market our Slendertone and Compex Sport product lines. Nevertheless,
because it has taken us longer than anticipated to commence this marketing process, our revenues
from the United States consumer division were below our expectations for fiscal 2005. Without
giving effect to exchange rates, our European operations did not perform to our expectations during
fiscal 2005, reflecting both a very poor economic environment for consumer goods in Europe,
competitive pressure in our largest market, Italy, and continued difficulty in managing operations
in several geographies. Overall, these factors contributed to growing revenue, but decreased
overall profitability.
The following table sets forth information from the statements of operations as a percentage of
revenue for the periods indicated:
Results of Operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net sales and rental revenue |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales and rentals |
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
33.1 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
70.1 |
|
|
|
66.9 |
|
|
|
67.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
|
41.6 |
|
|
|
43.2 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
58.7 |
|
|
|
61.1 |
|
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of Year Ended June 30, 2005 to Year Ended June 30, 2004
Our revenue increased by 12% to $96.1 million during fiscal 2005 from $86.0 million during
fiscal 2004. Revenue from our U.S. medical division and our U.S. consumer division accounted for a
13% increase. This was slightly offset by a 1% decrease in our international division.
Revenue from our U.S. medical division for fiscal 2005 was $60 million, up 15% from the $52 million
for fiscal 2004. On a sequential basis, U.S. medical revenue increased 17% versus the fiscal third
quarter and increased 32% over the comparable fourth quarter of 2004. This increase is primarily
due to an increase in sales and rentals of medical devices, reflecting our ongoing expansion of our
direct selling efforts to the physician markets and an increase in our wholesale medical business.
The revenue growth was attained despite a continued shift in our revenue mix from the higher
reimbursement workers compensation/personal injury segment to the group contract insurance
segment. This is a result of the change in our selling model and also increases the credit reserve
percentage that we record. We monitor the reserve balances on an ongoing basis and make
adjustments to the reserve based primarily on collection history. We continued to expand our
direct medical sales and rental business through the acquisition of SpectraBrace, Ltd. in June
2005. This acquisition did not have a significant impact on our revenue for the period, but we anticipate that it will
contribute to increasing sales in fiscal 2006.
23
Our U.S. consumer division recorded revenue of $4.2 million for fiscal 2005. This represents an
increase of $3.4 million, or 437%, over fiscal 2004 revenue of $0.8 million. Our increased
revenues have been driven through our infomercial and our current
agreements with the Home Shopping
Network (HSN) and General Nutrition Centers (GNC). We started selling through several retail
chains, Dunhams Sports and Academy Sports and Outdoors, in early fiscal 2006 and anticipate that
these sales together with a broader exposure through infomercials, will contribute to further
revenue growth in our U.S. consumer division during fiscal 2006.
Our international division recorded revenue of $31.8 million for fiscal 2005. This represents a 4%
decrease from the $33.1 million in revenue recorded for fiscal 2004. Sales of our Compex line of
products accounted for a 9% decrease. This decrease was partially offset by a 5% favorable impact
of exchange rates and a slight increase in Slendertone revenue over fiscal 2004. The number of
Compex unit sales was down slightly when compared to prior year amounts, however, the mix of our
Compex line of products sold during fiscal 2005 shifted toward our lower-priced models. During
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, we introduced the Energy line of products targeted at the
health and wellness markets, an entirely new market opportunity for us. The price points for this
market are below our higher priced models for competitive athletes.
We stopped distributing the Slendertone line of products in Europe
during June 2005 and will recognize minimal revenue from those
products in Europe during 2006. We nevertheless are taking measures
to improve results from our European operations and have plans to
more actively promote our lower priced products in select markets
through broadcast media advertising.
Our gross profit was $65.1 million or 67.8% of revenue during fiscal 2005. This compares to gross
profit of $57.5 million or 66.9% of revenue in fiscal 2004. The increase in gross margin percentage
is primarily due to the significant increase in our U.S. medical division and the higher gross
margins associated with our pain management products, rehabilitation products, and accessories and
supplies. The overall margins are negatively influenced by the continued shift in our domestic
medical division from the higher reimbursement categories, such as the workers compensation
segment, to the group contract insurance segments. Additionally, a change in our overall revenue
mix toward more U.S. consumer products, as a percentage of our overall revenues, which carry a
lower gross margin than our U.S. medical division, partially offset the increase. Cost of sales and
gross profit for fiscal 2004 also reflect the sale of inventory that was acquired in the Filsport
acquisition which, because Filsport was a distributor, has a higher cost than inventory we have
manufactured and sold through Filsport after this acquired inventory was sold. All of the
inventory that was acquired as a part of the Filsport acquisition was sold in 2004. We anticipate
gross profit to stabilize in the mid-60% range as our domestic consumer division becomes a greater
percentage of our revenue and as we enter the health and wellness markets in Europe.
For fiscal 2005, our selling and marketing expenses increased 16% to $41.5 million or 43.2% of
revenue, from $35.8 million or 41.6% of revenue for fiscal 2004. Our U.S. medical divisions
selling expenses increased as we have increased our number of direct sales representatives and
field support employees to 91 as of June 30, 2005 as compared to 69 on June 30, 2004. This
reflects our commitment to invest in our U.S. medical direct sales team and to our physician
selling strategy. For fiscal 2005, selling and marketing expenses associated with the
introduction of the Compex and Slendertone products in the U.S. totaled approximately $6.8 million,
an increase of $3.0 million over fiscal 2004. Selling and marketing expenditures in our
international division were slightly lower than in fiscal 2004 when compared on a Euro to Euro
basis. This was entirely offset by the negative impact from exchange rates on expenses. We will
continue to devote substantial resources to marketing our consumer products during fiscal 2006 and
currently expect to increase our promotion and advertising expenditures for our consumer line of
products as these require a continuous marketing push.
General and administrative expenses for fiscal 2005 increased 16% to $16.4 million, or 17.1% of
revenue, up from $14.2 million, or 16.5% of revenue for fiscal 2004. Costs in both our corporate
and international offices for additional personnel and consulting
fees associated with our Sarbanes-Oxley compliance contributed to the increase. General and administrative expenses for fiscal 2005
were also impacted by approximately $550,000 in charges related to personnel reductions in our
international division. The unfavorable impact of foreign currency exchange in fiscal 2005
contributed 4% of the increase over fiscal 2004.
Our research and development expenses decreased to $2.5 million, or 2.6% of revenue, in fiscal
2005, from $2.6 million, or 3.0% of revenue in fiscal 2004. As we continue to pursue new
complementary products, we anticipate R&D spending will increase slightly in absolute terms, but
will decrease as a percentage of revenue. We are continuing to develop products for our U.S.
medical, U.S. consumer and our international business segments.
Interest expense decreased 10% to $468,000 in fiscal 2005 from $518,000 in fiscal 2004. Absent any
additional acquisitions, we anticipate we will still need a higher level of working capital to
support both our U.S. consumer and international divisions promotional and advertising expenses,
which will result in higher interest expense in fiscal 2006 when compared to fiscal 2005.
24
The provision for income taxes was 40% and 33% for fiscal years 2005 and 2004, respectively.
During fiscal 2005, we recognized a reduction in income tax expense of $1.2 million due to
the reversal of previously recorded tax contingencies. These contingencies relate to potential
U.S. taxation of certain international profits. Due to changes in
facts and circumstances, the Company no longer believes these tax
contingencies to be probable and has therefore reversed the remaining
reserve balance.
During fiscal 2004, we recognized a reduction in
income tax expense of $434,000 as the result of the resolution of various outstanding tax issues
because the statute for the tax year for which these contingencies applied to had passed.
As a result of the above activity, our net income decreased to $2.6 million in fiscal 2005 from
$3.1 million in fiscal 2004. Diluted earnings per share decreased to $0.20 for fiscal 2005 from
$0.24 for fiscal 2004.
Comparison of Year Ended June 30, 2004 to Year Ended June 30, 2003
Our revenue increased by 14% to $86.0 million during fiscal 2004 from $75.5 million during
fiscal 2003. Increases in our domestic medical division and our consumer division in Europe,
accounted for 8% of the increase with the remaining 6% of the increase a result of favorable
exchange rates.
Revenue from our U.S. medical
division for fiscal 2004 was $52.0 million, up 6% from the $49.1
million for fiscal 2003. Our medical sales division in the United States posted a revenue
increase of 10% for fiscal 2004 as compared to fiscal 2003. This increase was primarily due to an
increase in sales and rentals of medical devices, reflecting our ongoing expansion of our direct
selling efforts to the physician markets. This was partially offset by a 4% increase in our sales
credit reserve as compared to our reserve percentage in the comparable prior period. This increase
in credit reserve reflects a shift in our revenue mix from the higher reimbursement workers
compensation/personal injury segment to the group contract insurance segment. The company monitors
the reserve balances quarterly and makes adjustments to the reserve as deemed necessary. We
continued to expand our direct medical sales and rental business through the acquisition of
BMR-Neurotech, which was included in our results of operations for fiscal 2004, but only partially
included in fiscal 2003, as the acquisition occurred in mid-May 2003.
Our U.S. consumer division contributed approximately $0.8 million, or 1%, of the growth in fiscal
2004 over prior year. Sales of product in this division were insignificant in fiscal 2003. We
began actively promoting the Slendertone line in October 2003, received favorable publicity in
December 2003 and January 2004 in two fitness magazine articles, and obtained very favorable
results from a sports study conducted at the University of Wisconsin La Crosse in January 2004.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2004, we entered into an endorsement contract with Sarah
Ferguson, Duchess of York, whose assistance helped overcome the market image of these products.
Our European operations posted a revenue increase of 26% for fiscal 2004. Approximately 16% was
generated by a favorable impact of exchange rates, reflecting the strength of the euro versus the
dollar. The acquisition of Filsport in Italy accounted for 12% and revenue from the addition of
Slendertone products contributed 6% to our European revenue increase. This increase was partially
offset by a 6% decrease in sales of our Compex line of products. The actual number of Compex units
sold was down 2% when compared to prior year unit sales. Additionally, the product mix shifted
toward our newly introduced lower-priced models. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, we
introduced the Energy line of products targeted at the health and wellness markets, an entirely
new market opportunity for us. The price points for this market are below our higher priced models
for competitive athletes.
Our gross profit was $57.5 million or 66.9% of revenue during fiscal 2004. This compares to gross
profit of $52.9 million or 70.1% of revenue in fiscal 2003. Cost of sales and gross profit for
fiscal 2004 also reflect the sale of inventory that was acquired in the Filsport acquisition which,
because Filsport was a distributor, has a higher cost than inventory we have manufactured and sold
through Filsport after this acquired inventory was sold. All of the inventory that was acquired as
a part of the Filsport acquisition has been sold. The overall decrease in margin percentage was
also impacted by lower average selling prices in Europe due to the introduction of our fitness line
of Compex products during fiscal 2004, our increased sales credit in our medical business, and a decrease in our higher margin accessories and supplies as a percent of total
revenue when compared to fiscal 2003.
25
For fiscal 2004, our selling expenses increased 19% to $35.8 million or 41.6% of revenue, from
$30.0 million or 39.7% of revenue for fiscal 2003. Selling expenses associated with the July 2003
acquisition of Filsport and the marketing expenses for our new consumer products both domestically
and in Europe contributed significantly to the increases in 2004. In the United States, we also
increased the number of our direct sales employees to 69 as of June 30, 2004 as compared to 50 on
June 30, 2003. We finalized contracts with several individuals to endorse our products that
required specific payments as part of these expenditures. Promotion and advertising expenses
associated with the introduction of the Compex and Slendertone products in the U.S. and with
Slendertone in Europe totaled approximately $4.4 million.
General and administrative expenses for fiscal 2004 totaled $14.2 million, or 16.5% of revenue, a
16% increase over the $12.2 million or 16.2% of revenue in fiscal 2003. This is primarily due to
expenses in fiscal 2004 that we did not incur in fiscal 2003 in both
the U.S. and international
divisions as we worked to complete documentation of internal controls to meet the requirements of
Sarbanes-Oxley. We started the process in the second fiscal quarter of 2004; although our timeline
for compliance was deferred by one year to June 30, 2005.
Our research and development expenses increased to $2.6 million in fiscal 2004 from $2.1 million in
fiscal 2003. R&D spending focused on complementary products, such as our IF3Wave medical device, our Energy and
Body line of consumer products in Europe, and our Fitness Trainer model to be introduced in the
domestic consumer market.
Interest expense increased 21% to $518,000 in fiscal 2004 from $428,000 in fiscal 2003. In July
2003, we incurred additional borrowings of approximately $3.8 million with a bank in Switzerland
that we used to finance the acquisition of Filsport.
The provision for income taxes was 33% and 40% for fiscal years 2004 and 2003, respectively. During
fiscal 2004, we recognized a reduction in income tax expense of $434,000 as the result of
the resolution of various outstanding tax issues because the statute for the tax year for which
these contingencies applied to had passed. The tax rate was lowered in the third quarter of fiscal
2003 from 42% to 40% after a review of the tax rates in several of our European tax jurisdictions.
As a result of the above activity, our net income decreased to $3.1 million in fiscal 2004 from
$5.0 million in fiscal 2003. Diluted earnings per share decreased to $0.24 for fiscal 2004 from
$0.45 for fiscal 2003.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
On June 23, 2005, we purchased all of the capital stock of SpectraBrace, Ltd., for $3.65 million,
$350,000 of which was retained by us for six months to cover the indemnity obligations of
the sellers. SprectraBrace, a physician office based durable medical equipment distributor
specializing in the orthopedic market, is headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky. The acquisition
was financed through a newly established term note. The excess of the purchase over the fair value
of the underlying assets acquired of $2,158,978 has been preliminarily allocated to goodwill of
$1,158,978 and $1,000,000 million of a separate customer relationship intangible, which will be
amortized over 5 years. Any additional contingent consideration that is incurred as part of this
acquisition will be allocated to goodwill. Pro forma information related to this acquisition is
not included as the impact is not deemed to be material.
For the year ended June 30, 2005, our operating activities used cash of $1.0 million. The $4.2
million that we generated during the period through net income, after adjustment for non-cash
depreciation and amortization, was offset by a $7.5 million
increase in accounts receivable and a $1.9
million increase in inventories. The increase in receivables was primarily a result of increased
revenue, the translation effect when converting our European receivables to U.S. dollars, and
slower collections in Europe as a result of the slow economy. Our reserve for uncollectible
receivables increased by approximately $1.6 million during the year ended June 30, 2005, but
decreased as a percentage of total receivables from 38% at June 30, 2004 to 34% at June 30, 2005.
The increase in inventory is primarily due to additional purchases of
raw materials in anticipation of increased orders in our U.S. medical wholesale division. The increase in accounts payable and in accrued
liabilities relates to year-end June 30, 2005 timing differences and the payment of estimated
income taxes during the 2004 fiscal year.
26
We used $5.7 million in investing activities in fiscal 2005, including $3.3 million to fund the
purchase of SpectraBrace, Ltd. and $2.4 million for net purchases of property and equipment,
primarily clinical and rental equipment.
Our financing activities generated $7.8 million of cash during the year ended June 30, 2005. We
amended our current credit facility and borrowed $3.3 million from our existing financial
institution to fund the acquisition of SpectraBrace, Ltd. At June 30, 2005, a total of $7.5
million remains outstanding under the U.S. facility. We recently renegotiated our U.S. credit line
up to a $15.0 million facility with a maturity date of
June 30, 2008.
We will continue to invest in our U.S. consumer line of products over the next year as we develop
our infomercial and as we promote our products to large retail chains. We feel the existing
working capital facility will be sufficient for this requirement.
We engage several celebrities who endorse our consumer products to act as our spokespersons in
promoting those products and we have agreed to pay them for use of their names and for their
services in appearing in advertisements. We have contractual commitments under these agreements
totaling approximately $570,000 for the year ending June 30, 2006.
The
following table shows, as of June 30, 2005, these and other unconditional contract commitments we have entered into,
as well as commitments we have under long-term debt and capital and operating leases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Less than 1 year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
4-5 years |
|
|
After 5 years |
|
Long Term Debt |
|
$ |
5,719,600 |
|
|
$ |
1,609,800 |
|
|
$ |
2,509,800 |
|
|
$ |
1,600,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Notes Payable |
|
|
7,500,000 |
|
|
|
7,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Lease Obligation |
|
|
23,712 |
|
|
|
5,472 |
|
|
|
10,944 |
|
|
|
7,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Leases |
|
|
3,112,660 |
|
|
|
441,096 |
|
|
|
744,864 |
|
|
|
656,064 |
|
|
|
1,270,636 |
|
Celebrity Endorsements |
|
|
566,667 |
|
|
|
566,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Cash
Obligations |
|
$ |
16,922,639 |
|
|
$ |
10,123,035 |
|
|
$ |
3,265,608 |
|
|
$ |
2,263,360 |
|
|
$ |
1,270,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At August 31, 2005, we had
approximately $6.6 million of unused borrowing capacity under our credit
facilities. Historically, our cash generated from operations has been adequate to finance most of
our operating activities and to finance debt and capital lease service, even with slightly
increased investment in marketing for new business lines. Accordingly, we believe that cash flow
from operations, with available borrowings under our credit facility, will be adequate to fund cash
requirements for the current fiscal year and the foreseeable future. We may also apply cash to
acquisitions during future periods.
Item 7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
During the year ended June 30, 2005, our revenue originating outside the U.S. was 33% of total
revenue, substantially all of which was denominated in the local functional currency. Currently,
we do not employ currency hedging strategies to reduce the risks associated with the fluctuation of
foreign currency exchange rates.
Our international division is subject to risks typical of an international division, including, but
not limited to: differing economic conditions, changes in political climate, differing tax
structures, other regulations and restrictions, and foreign exchange rate volatility. Accordingly,
our future results could be materially adversely impacted by changes in these or other factors.
27
We are exposed to market risk from changes in the interest rates on certain outstanding debt. The
outstanding loan balance under our $15 million credit facility bears interest at a variable rate
based on the banks prime rate or LIBOR. Based on the average outstanding bank debt for fiscal
2005, a 100 basis point change in interest rates would not change interest expense by a material
amount.
Item 8. Financial Statements.
Financial Statement Index
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule |
|
Page |
|
|
|
Report of Ernst & Young LLP
|
|
|
29 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
30 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
31 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity for the years ended
June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
32 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
33 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
34-51 |
|
Report of Ernst & Young LLP Section 404
|
|
|
52 |
|
28
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Compex Technologies, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Compex Technologies, Inc as of June
30, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity, and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2005. Our audits also included
the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Compex Technologies, Inc. at June 30, 2005 and
2004, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended June 30, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the effectiveness of Compex Technologies Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of June 30, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission and our report dated September 12, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
September 12, 2005
29
COMPEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF JUNE 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
3,198,832 |
|
|
$ |
3,044,158 |
|
Receivables, less reserves of $17,665,865 and $19,250,165
at June 30, 2004 and 2005, respectively |
|
|
28,802,468 |
|
|
|
37,268,582 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
|
1,037,944 |
|
|
|
1,280,370 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
10,765 |
|
|
|
417,090 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
11,941,708 |
|
|
|
13,656,012 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
6,008,936 |
|
|
|
6,108,627 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
3,646,300 |
|
|
|
3,217,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
54,646,953 |
|
|
|
64,992,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
|
|
4,798,656 |
|
|
|
5,902,780 |
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
15,501,566 |
|
|
|
16,630,871 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
908,841 |
|
|
|
1,636,682 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
224,679 |
|
|
|
13,396 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
128,701 |
|
|
|
142,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
76,209,396 |
|
|
$ |
89,318,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,268,910 |
|
|
$ |
1,614,596 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
2,200,000 |
|
|
|
7,500,000 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
5,678,181 |
|
|
|
7,421,609 |
|
Accrued
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll |
|
|
1,990,591 |
|
|
|
2,719,545 |
|
Commissions |
|
|
917,068 |
|
|
|
1,073,365 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
1,731,444 |
|
|
|
1,368,679 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,377,681 |
|
|
|
4,735,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
17,163,875 |
|
|
|
26,433,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,436,200 |
|
|
|
4,127,019 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
278,286 |
|
|
|
438,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
19,878,361 |
|
|
|
30,999,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.10 par value: 30,000,000 shares authorized;
issued and outstanding 12,425,747 and 12,526,880 shares
at June 30, 2004 and 2005, respectively |
|
|
1,242,574 |
|
|
|
1,252,688 |
|
Preferred stock, no par value: 5,000,000 shares authorized;
none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
32,887,912 |
|
|
|
33,440,966 |
|
Unearned compensation on restricted stock |
|
|
(119,370 |
) |
|
|
(47,329 |
) |
Accumulated other non-owner changes in equity |
|
|
2,340,916 |
|
|
|
1,142,604 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
19,979,003 |
|
|
|
22,530,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
56,331,035 |
|
|
|
58,319,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
76,209,396 |
|
|
$ |
89,318,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
30
COMPEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net sales and rental revenue |
|
$ |
75,459,916 |
|
|
$ |
85,960,663 |
|
|
$ |
96,074,039 |
|
Cost of sales and rentals |
|
|
22,578,263 |
|
|
|
28,435,680 |
|
|
|
30,944,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
52,881,653 |
|
|
|
57,524,983 |
|
|
|
65,129,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
29,969,004 |
|
|
|
35,763,300 |
|
|
|
41,548,556 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
12,201,022 |
|
|
|
14,197,056 |
|
|
|
16,440,874 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
2,122,659 |
|
|
|
2,554,290 |
|
|
|
2,497,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
44,292,685 |
|
|
|
52,514,646 |
|
|
|
60,487,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
8,588,968 |
|
|
|
5,010,337 |
|
|
|
4,642,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(428,467 |
) |
|
|
(517,717 |
) |
|
|
(467,948 |
) |
Other |
|
|
109,054 |
|
|
|
84,747 |
|
|
|
81,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
8,269,555 |
|
|
|
4,577,367 |
|
|
|
4,256,396 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
3,308,000 |
|
|
|
1,527,000 |
|
|
|
1,705,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,961,555 |
|
|
$ |
3,050,367 |
|
|
$ |
2,551,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common and common equivalent share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
10,951,808 |
|
|
|
11,804,768 |
|
|
|
12,472,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
11,068,860 |
|
|
|
12,683,587 |
|
|
|
12,853,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
31
COMPEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional Paid- |
|
|
on Restricted |
|
|
Other Non-Owner |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Stockholders' |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
In Capital |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Changes in Equity |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, June 30, 2002 |
|
|
10,922,618 |
|
|
|
1,092,262 |
|
|
|
21,564,096 |
|
|
|
(77,813 |
) |
|
|
735,564 |
|
|
|
11,967,081 |
|
|
|
35,281,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,961,555 |
|
|
|
4,961,555 |
|
Translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,134,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,134,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,096,174 |
|
Exercise of stock options and related tax benefits |
|
|
58,226 |
|
|
|
5,823 |
|
|
|
156,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,308 |
|
Common stock issued through Employee Stock Purchase
Plan |
|
|
5,125 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
20,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,909 |
|
Amortization of unearned compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,937 |
) |
Cancelled restricted stock |
|
|
(37,500 |
) |
|
|
(3,750 |
) |
|
|
(90,000 |
) |
|
|
93,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2003 |
|
|
10,948,469 |
|
|
|
1,094,847 |
|
|
|
21,650,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,870,183 |
|
|
|
16,928,636 |
|
|
|
41,544,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,050,367 |
|
|
|
3,050,367 |
|
Translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
470,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
470,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,521,100 |
|
Exercise of stock options and related tax benefits |
|
|
157,250 |
|
|
|
15,725 |
|
|
|
447,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463,469 |
|
Common stock issued through Employee Stock Purchase
Plan |
|
|
57,130 |
|
|
|
5,713 |
|
|
|
195,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201,584 |
|
Issuance of restricted stock |
|
|
20,498 |
|
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
|
123,603 |
|
|
|
(125,652 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unearned compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,282 |
|
Options granted to Non-Employees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,007 |
|
Shares issued in stock offering |
|
|
1,250,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
10,414,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,539,498 |
|
Cancelled restricted stock |
|
|
(7,500 |
) |
|
|
(750 |
) |
|
|
(18,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,750 |
) |
Cancellation of subsidiary stock |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(789 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(799 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2004 |
|
|
12,425,747 |
|
|
$ |
1,242,574 |
|
|
$ |
32,887,912 |
|
|
$ |
(119,370 |
) |
|
$ |
2,340,916 |
|
|
$ |
19,979,003 |
|
|
$ |
56,331,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,551,281 |
|
|
|
2,551,281 |
|
Translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,198,312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,198,312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,352,969 |
|
Exercise of stock options and related tax benefits |
|
|
35,456 |
|
|
|
3,546 |
|
|
|
87,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,644 |
|
Common stock issued through Employee Stock Purchase
Plan |
|
|
65,677 |
|
|
|
6,568 |
|
|
|
291,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297,785 |
|
Amortization of unearned compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,041 |
|
Options granted to Non-Employees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2005 |
|
|
12,526,880 |
|
|
$ |
1,252,688 |
|
|
$ |
33,440,966 |
|
|
$ |
(47,329 |
) |
|
$ |
1,142,604 |
|
|
$ |
22,530,284 |
|
|
$ |
58,319,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
COMPEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,961,555 |
|
|
$ |
3,050,367 |
|
|
$ |
2,551,281 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
1,349,988 |
|
|
|
1,552,485 |
|
|
|
1,397,621 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
267,018 |
|
|
|
258,269 |
|
|
|
270,167 |
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
(15,937 |
) |
|
|
60,740 |
|
|
|
246,780 |
|
Change in deferred taxes |
|
|
80,111 |
|
|
|
(1,162,347 |
) |
|
|
270,781 |
|
Changes in current assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
2,011,498 |
|
|
|
(4,416,548 |
) |
|
|
(7,451,422 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(1,799,677 |
) |
|
|
776,259 |
|
|
|
(1,892,524 |
) |
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
(601,051 |
) |
|
|
(462,147 |
) |
|
|
418,539 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
394,799 |
|
|
|
24,643 |
|
|
|
1,302,626 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
(1,578,475 |
) |
|
|
(1,686,870 |
) |
|
|
1,846,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities |
|
|
5,069,829 |
|
|
|
(2,005,149 |
) |
|
|
(1,039,210 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(1,163,893 |
) |
|
|
(1,606,844 |
) |
|
|
(2,429,617 |
) |
Cash paid in asset acquisitions, net of cash received |
|
|
(3,150,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,424,563 |
) |
|
|
(3,300,000 |
) |
Sale of fixed assets |
|
|
350,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in other assets, net |
|
|
(6,036 |
) |
|
|
108,433 |
|
|
|
(6,312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(3,969,902 |
) |
|
|
(4,922,974 |
) |
|
|
(5,735,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from new debt financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,835,501 |
|
|
|
3,300,000 |
|
Principal payments on long-term obligations |
|
|
(2,521,736 |
) |
|
|
(7,715,240 |
) |
|
|
(1,238,275 |
) |
Proceeds from (payments on) line of credit, net |
|
|
4,500,000 |
|
|
|
(2,300,000 |
) |
|
|
5,300,000 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
162,308 |
|
|
|
463,469 |
|
|
|
90,644 |
|
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
20,909 |
|
|
|
201,584 |
|
|
|
297,785 |
|
Proceeds from stock offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,539,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
2,161,481 |
|
|
|
5,024,812 |
|
|
|
7,750,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(292,051 |
) |
|
|
46,136 |
|
|
|
(1,129,689 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
2,969,357 |
|
|
|
(1,857,175 |
) |
|
|
(154,674 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
2,086,650 |
|
|
|
5,056,007 |
|
|
|
3,198,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
5,056,007 |
|
|
$ |
3,198,832 |
|
|
$ |
3,044,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash transaction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of
equipment through capital lease obligation |
|
|
126,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
418,121 |
|
|
$ |
517,719 |
|
|
$ |
276,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
2,451,062 |
|
|
$ |
3,105,223 |
|
|
$ |
1,860,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
33
COMPEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Compex Technologies, Inc. and its
subsidiaries. All significant inter-company transactions and accounts have been eliminated.
Revenue Recognition and Provisions for Credit Allowances and Returns
Compex Technologies, Inc. (the Company) derives revenue in the United States from medical
products and accessories (United States Medical) sales and rentals directly to patients and to
wholesalers. The Company also derives revenue in the United States from the sales of consumer
products (United States Consumer) to distributors and directly to consumers. In certain
non-domestic markets (International), the Company derives revenue primarily from the sales of
consumer products to distributors and dealers.
United States Medical. The direct medical business involves providing products to patients
for rent or purchase, the sale of accessories to patients for the ongoing use of such products and
billing of the patients insurance provider for the products and accessories. The wholesale
medical business involves the sale of devices and medical supplies primarily to clinics and medical
equipment distributors.
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, as
amended by SAB No. 104, when each of the following four conditions are met: 1) a contract or sales
arrangement exists; 2) products have been shipped and title has transferred or services have been
rendered; 3) the price of the products or services is fixed or determinable; and 4) collectibility
is reasonably assured. Accordingly, the Company recognizes direct medical revenue, both rental and
purchase, when products have been dispensed to the patient and the patients insurance has been
verified. For medical products that are sold from inventories consigned at clinic locations, the
Company recognizes revenue when it receives notice that the product has been prescribed and
dispensed to the patient and the insurance has been verified or preauthorization has been obtained
from the insurance company, when required. The Company recognizes wholesale medical revenue when it
ships its products to its wholesale customers.
Revenue from the rental of products to patients accounts for approximately 16% and 17%,
respectively, of the United States Medical revenue for the periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. Revenue from the rental of products is recognized ratably based on the number of
days remaining in the month. Products on rental contracts are placed in fixed assets and
depreciated over their estimated useful life. All revenue is recognized net of estimated sales
allowances and returns.
The Company has established reserves to account for sales allowances, product returns and rental
credits. Sales allowances generally result from agreements with certain insurance providers that
permit reimbursement to the Company in amounts that are below the products invoice price. This
reserve is provided for by reducing gross revenue by a portion of the amount invoiced during the
relevant period. The Company estimates the amount of the reduction based upon historical experience
and considers the impact of new contract terms or modifications of existing arrangements with
insurance providers. For patient returns of products after purchase, the amount previously
recorded as revenue in a prior period is provided for by reducing gross revenue in the current
period. Rental credits result when patients purchase products that they had previously rented.
Many insurance providers require patients to rent products for a
34
period of one to three months prior to purchase. If the patient has a long-term need for the
product, the insurance companies may authorize purchase of the product by these patients. When the
product is purchased, most insurance providers require that rental payments previously made on the
product be credited toward the purchase price. These rental credits are processed at the same time
the revenue is recorded on the sale of the product. A change in the percentage of medical sales
made pursuant to such contracts or a change in the number or type of products that are returned
could cause the level of these reserves to vary in the future.
United States Consumer. The U.S. consumer products business involves the sales of products
to distributors, sport shops and direct sales to consumers. Revenue is primarily recognized at the
time of shipment to distributors, sport shops and direct sales to consumers. A portion of the
Companys inventory is out on consignment with certain distributors and the revenue is not
recognized until the distributor sells the product to a consumer. All revenue is recognized net of
estimated sales allowances and returns. The Company has established reserves to account for sales
allowances and product returns. All consumer products are sold with a 30-day, money back guarantee
and the Company estimates the amount of the revenue reduction based upon historical experience and
considers the impact of new contract terms or modifications of existing arrangements with
distributors.
International. The international products business involves the sales to sports shops,
retail shops and health care providers. Revenue is recognized at the time of shipment to dealers,
distributors, sport shops and health care providers, direct sales to consumers or upon notification
from a health care provider that equipment has been prescribed and provided to a patient and
approved by the patient or his/her insurance provider. All revenue is recognized net of estimated
sales allowances and product returns. The Company has established reserves to account for sales
allowances, product returns and rental credits. The Company estimates the amount of the revenue
reduction based upon historical experience and considers the impact of new contract terms or
modifications of existing arrangements with distributors.
Reserve for Uncollectible Accounts Receivable
United States Revenue. Revenue from rental and sale of products directly to patients and
health care providers accounted for approximately 58% of total revenue in fiscal 2005, 56% in
fiscal 2004 and 61% in 2003. A significant portion of the related receivables are from insurance
companies or other third party reimbursing agents. The nature of these receivables within this
industry has typically resulted in long collection cycles. The process of determining what
products will be reimbursed by third party payors and the amounts that they will reimburse is very
complex and the reimbursement environment is constantly changing. The Company maintains a reserve
for uncollectible receivables, and provides for additions to the reserve, to account for the risk
of nonpayment. The Company sets the amount of the reserve, and adjusts the reserve at the end of
each reporting period, based on a number of factors, including historical rates of collection,
trends in the historical rates of collection and current relationships and experience with
insurance companies or other third party payors. If the rates of collection of past-due
receivables recorded for previous fiscal periods changes, or if there is a trend in the rates of
collection on those receivables, the Company may be required to change the rate at which they
provide for additions to the reserve. A change in the rates of the Companys collections can
result from a number of factors, including turnover in personnel, changes in the reimbursement
policies or practices of payors, or changes in industry rates of reimbursement. Further, the
reserve may be affected by significant charge-offs if a related group of receivables become
doubtful. Accordingly, the provision for uncollectible accounts recorded in the income statement
has fluctuated and may continue to fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter as such trends
change. Such reserves have gradually increased as third party payors have delayed payments and
restricted amounts to be reimbursed for products and services provided by the Company.
United States Consumer and International. The Company also maintains a reserve for
uncollectible accounts that result in non-payment from both distributors and direct customers in
its consumer and
35
international business. Because sales in this business are not subject to third party
reimbursement, the reserve is based primarily on specific review of accounts and, to a lesser
degree, on historical and economic trends.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out basis) or market. For its United
States medical business, the Company maintains a large balance of electrical stimulation devices on
consignment at clinics and other health care providers that are not under their control. In the
course of the Companys business, some of this product is lost. Although the Company has the right
in most cases to seek reimbursement for the lost product from their sales representatives or the
health care providers, in some instances the Company foregoes that right in order to maintain
favorable relationships. The Company maintains a reserve for the amount of consignment inventory
that may be lost based on their experience as developed through periodic field audits.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method
for financial reporting purposes and accelerated methods for income tax reporting purposes.
Estimated useful lives for financial reporting purposes are as follows:
|
|
|
Building
|
|
39 years |
Office furniture and equipment
|
|
3-10 years |
Production equipment
|
|
3-5 years |
Clinical and rental equipment
|
|
5 years |
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held
and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted future net
cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired,
the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the
assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of
the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
Goodwill and Intangibles
The Company performed the required impairment test of goodwill as of June 30, 2005 and 2004, and
determined that no impairment issues existed. The first step of the goodwill impairment test
compares the fair value of a reporting unit with the carrying amount of the reporting unit,
including goodwill. The Company compared, separately, the fair value of its U.S. medical division
and international division with the carrying amount, including goodwill, of each respective
division. The fair value of each division exceeded the book value, therefore goodwill was not
considered impaired and the second step of the goodwill impairment test, used to measure the amount
of the impairment loss, was not required. The Company had no intangible assets with indefinite
useful lives as of June 30, 2005 and 2004. At June 30, 2005 and 2004, the Company had $16.6
million and $15.5 million, respectively, of goodwill on its consolidated balance sheet.
36
Changes in the net carrying amount of goodwill were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Medical |
|
|
International |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Goodwill as of June 30, 2003 |
|
$ |
1,458,530 |
|
|
$ |
9,124,757 |
|
|
$ |
10,583,287 |
|
Acquisition of Filsport Assistance S.r.l. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,165,369 |
|
|
|
4,165,369 |
|
Effect of exchange rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,481 |
|
|
|
189,481 |
|
Elimination of Rehabilicare UK Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,999 |
) |
|
|
(34,999 |
) |
Adjustment of BMR Neurotech Goodwill |
|
|
598,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
598,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill as of June 30, 2004 |
|
$ |
2,056,958 |
|
|
$ |
13,444,608 |
|
|
$ |
15,501,566 |
|
Acquisition of SpectraBrace, Ltd. |
|
|
1,158,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,158,978 |
|
Effect of exchange rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,673 |
) |
|
|
(29,673 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill as of June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
3,215,936 |
|
|
$ |
13,414,935 |
|
|
$ |
16,630,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refer to Note 2 for a discussion of the acquisition of SpectraBrace, Ltd.
Other intangible assets included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accum. |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accum. |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
Acquired Technology |
|
$ |
1,400,000 |
|
|
$ |
866,043 |
|
|
$ |
533,957 |
|
|
$ |
1,400,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,041,039 |
|
|
$ |
358,961 |
|
Non-Compete |
|
|
850,000 |
|
|
|
789,848 |
|
|
|
60,152 |
|
|
|
850,000 |
|
|
|
809,853 |
|
|
|
40,147 |
|
Debt Structure Costs |
|
|
346,970 |
|
|
|
343,435 |
|
|
|
3,535 |
|
|
|
346,970 |
|
|
|
346,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patents |
|
|
36,716 |
|
|
|
17,745 |
|
|
|
18,971 |
|
|
|
36,716 |
|
|
|
20,367 |
|
|
|
16,349 |
|
Customer List |
|
|
369,754 |
|
|
|
77,528 |
|
|
|
292,226 |
|
|
|
369,754 |
|
|
|
148,529 |
|
|
|
221,225 |
|
Customer Relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,003,440 |
|
|
$ |
2,094,599 |
|
|
$ |
908,841 |
|
|
$ |
4,003,440 |
|
|
$ |
2,366,758 |
|
|
$ |
1,636,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate amortization expense recognized for fiscal 2005, 2004, and 2003 was $270,167, $258,269,
and $267,018 respectively. The aggregate amortization expense for the five succeeding fiscal years
is expected to approximate $1,636,682. Intangible assets with a definite life are amortized on a
straight-line basis over estimated useful lives ranging from 3 8 years.
Advertising
Advertising costs, recorded in selling and marketing expense, are expensed upon first showing of
the related advertising. Total expense was approximately $4,728,000, $2,748,000, and $550,000 in
2005, 2004, and 2003 respectively. At June 30, 2004, $381,428 of advertising costs were recorded
in prepaid expenses on the balance sheet related to television commercials that had not yet aired
for the first time as of June 30, 2004. There were no prepaid advertising costs at June 30, 2005.
Research and Development
Research and development costs are expensed when incurred.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under this method,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized and measured using enacted tax rates in effect
for the
37
year in which the
differences are expected to be recognized. Valuation allowances are established
when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts that are more likely than not to be
realized.
Stock-Based Compensation
At June 30, 2005, the Company had various stock-based employee compensation plans which are
described more fully in Note 8. Through June 30, 2005, the Company had adopted the disclosure-only
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Statement No. 123), Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148
but applied Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB 25) and related interpretations in
accounting for its stock plans. Under APB 25, when the exercise price of an employee stock option
equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is
recognized.
Had compensation expense for the Companys stock-based compensation plans been determined based on
the fair value at the grant dates consistent with SFAS No. 123, the Companys net income and
earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net Income |
|
As reported |
|
$ |
4,961,555 |
|
|
$ |
3,050,367 |
|
|
$ |
2,551,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
on restricted stock |
|
|
(15,937 |
) |
|
|
60,740 |
|
|
|
246,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma option
expense, net of tax |
|
|
(535,587 |
) |
|
|
(887,976 |
) |
|
|
(1,168,474 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
4,410,031 |
|
|
$ |
2,223,131 |
|
|
$ |
1,629,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
Diluted
earnings per share |
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2005, 2004,
and 2003, respectively; dividend yield of 0%; expected volatility of 59.0%, 61.0% and 57.6%; risk-free interest
rate of 3.87%, 3.60% and 2.94%; and expected lives of 6 years.
The weighted-average fair value per option at the date of grant for options granted in 2005, 2004,
and 2003 was $2.60, $3.43, and $2.04, respectively.
The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded
options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option
pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions. Because the Companys employee
stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and
because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate,
the existing models may not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of the
Companys employee stock options.
38
Earnings Per Share
Net income per share is calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
Statement No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Potential common shares are included in the diluted net
income per share calculation when dilutive. Potential common shares consisting of common stock
issuable upon exercise of outstanding common stock options are computed using the treasury stock
method. Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed by
dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period,
increased to include dilutive potential common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options
that were outstanding during the period. The table below is a reconciliation of the numerator and
denominator in the basic and diluted net income per share calculation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Numerator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
4,961,555 |
|
|
$ |
3,050,367 |
|
|
$ |
2,551,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic net income per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
10,951,808 |
|
|
|
11,804,768 |
|
|
|
12,472,204 |
|
Effect of dilutive stock options and
restricted stock |
|
|
117,052 |
|
|
|
878,819 |
|
|
|
381,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net income per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
11,068,860 |
|
|
|
12,683,587 |
|
|
|
12,853,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
Employee
stock options of 408,471, 107,393, and 441,781 for the years ended June 30 2005, 2004, and
2003, respectively, have been excluded from the diluted net income per share calculation because
their effect would be anti-dilutive.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Companys financial instruments primarily consist of cash, receivables and payables for which
current carrying amounts approximate fair market value. Additionally, interest rates on
outstanding borrowings are at rates which approximate market rates for borrowings with similar
terms and average maturities, resulting in the carrying value of the Companys debt approximating
fair value.
Foreign Currency Translation
Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency are translated to United States dollars at
year-end exchange rates. Elements of the statement of operations are translated at average
exchange rates in effect during the year. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are
included in net income. Adjustments arising from the translation of most net assets located
outside the United States (gains and losses) are recorded as a component of accumulated other
non-owner changes in equity.
39
Shipping and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs related to unit and supplies fulfillment services are included in cost
of goods sold.
Reclassification
Certain prior year items have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.
Use of Estimates
Preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Ultimate
results could differ from those estimates. The most significant management estimates used in the
preparation of the financial statements are associated with the reserves established for sales
allowances and returns, uncollectible accounts, lost consignment inventory and inventory
obsolescence.
Selected Financial Statement Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Property, plant and equipment - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
1,683,614 |
|
|
|
1,683,614 |
|
Clinical and rental equipment |
|
|
1,401,842 |
|
|
|
1,744,193 |
|
Production equipment |
|
|
4,454,729 |
|
|
|
3,547,785 |
|
Office furniture and equipment |
|
|
10,594,573 |
|
|
|
9,931,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,284,758 |
|
|
$ |
17,056,699 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(13,486,102 |
) |
|
|
(11,153,919 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
4,798,656 |
|
|
$ |
5,902,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the Companys consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2005 and 2004 are net property,
plant and equipment of the Companys foreign operations, which are located in Europe and which
total $1,350,744 and $1,274,130, respectively.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 123(R), Share Based Payment (FAS 123(R)
revises FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation) and requires companies to
expense the fair value of employee stock options and other forms of stock-based compensation. The
standard is effective for the Companys 2006 fiscal year beginning July 1, 2005 and will apply to
the Companys employee stock option and stock purchase plans. The Company is currently evaluating
the impact of the adoption of FAS 123(R) and has not selected a transition method or valuation model.
As such, the Company is unable to estimate the expected effect on the Companys financial
statements, but believes it will have a material impact on the Companys results from
operations.
2. Business Acquisition
Acquisition of SpectraBrace, Ltd.:
On June 23, 2005, the Company purchased all of the capital stock of SpectraBrace, Ltd., for $3.65
million, $350,000 of which was retained by the Company for six months to cover the indemnity
obligations of the sellers. SpectraBrace, a physician office based durable medical equipment
distributor specializing in the orthopedic market, is headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky. The
acquisition was financed through a newly established term note. The acquisition was accounted for
using the purchase method of accounting with the purchase price allocated to the fair value of net
assets acquired, the majority of which included accounts receivable of $1.1 million, inventory of
$502,000, fixed assets of $81,000 and liabilities of $375,000. The excess of the purchase over the
fair value of the underlying assets acquired of $2,158,978 has been preliminarily allocated to
goodwill of $1,158,978 and $1,000,000 million to a separate customer relationship
40
intangible, which
will be amortized over 5 years. Any additional contingent consideration that is incurred as
part of this acquisition will be allocated to goodwill. Pro forma information related to this
acquisition is not included as the impact is not deemed to be material.
Acquisition of Filsport Assistance S.r.l.:
On July 3, 2003, the Company acquired substantially all the capital stock of Filsport Assistance
S.r.l., an independent distributor of the Compex® brand of consumer products in Italy. The
transaction involved an exchange of approximately $4.9 million in cash for stock. The acquisition
was financed through a newly-established credit facility and with existing funds. Prior to the
acquisition, Filsport operated under an exclusive distribution arrangement and accounted for 25% of
Compex SA total sales (10% of consolidated sales) in fiscal 2003. The purchase consideration
exceeded the net fair value of tangible assets by $4,165,369 and was assigned to goodwill.
Pro forma operating results as if Filsport had been acquired at the beginning of fiscal 2003 are as
follows (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
81,343,139 |
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
8,698,815 |
|
Net income |
|
|
5,180,533 |
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
.47 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
.47 |
|
The Company used existing cash, a new term loan and a credit line to finance this business
acquisition. The fair value of the assets and liabilities of the acquired company are presented as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable |
|
$ |
2,193,589 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
1,775,876 |
|
Prepaid Expenses |
|
|
681,888 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
135,748 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
4,165,369 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
12,401 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(1,007,062 |
) |
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
(1,179,090 |
) |
Liabilities forgiven |
|
|
(2,563,870 |
) |
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
(790,286 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
3,424,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of the assets of BMR Neurotech, Inc.:
On May 15, 2003, the Company acquired certain assets of BMR Neurotech, Inc., for total
consideration of approximately $3.3 million. The acquisition was financed using the existing
credit line. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting with the
purchase price allocated to the fair value of the net assets acquired, which included accounts
receivable, inventory and fixed assets. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of
the underlying assets acquired of $1,348,625 has been allocated to goodwill and thus is not
amortizable. Pro forma information related to this acquisition is not included as the impact is
not deemed to be material.
3. Stock Offering
The Company received net proceeds from the sale of common stock to certain shareholders in a
private placement, completed on November 20, 2003, of approximately $8.3 million and approximately
$2.2 million from
41
the sale of common stock to the same shareholders upon exercise of additional investment rights on
February 18, 2004. The Company used these proceeds to reduce indebtedness.
4. Comprehensive Income
SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and
display of comprehensive income and its components. Adjustments to comprehensive income for the
years ended June 30, 2005, 2004, and 2003 consisted solely of gains on translation of its foreign
subsidiary financial statements from the functional currency to U.S. dollars of ($1,198,312),
$470,733, and $1,134,619, respectively, resulting in total comprehensive income of $1,352,969,
$3,521,100, and $6,096,174, respectively.
5. Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt:
On June 2, 2004, the Company entered into an amended and restated credit agreement with its
principal lender providing for revolving borrowings of up to $15.0 million at varying rates based
either on the banks prime rate or LIBOR. Borrowings under this agreement are secured by
substantially all assets of the Company. On June 23, 2005, the Company amended the credit
agreement to borrow an additional $3.3 million under a term loan to fund the purchase price for the
SpectraBrace acquisition.
There was $7.5 million outstanding under the revolving portion of the credit agreement as of June
30, 2005 and $2.2 million under the revolving portion as of June 30, 2004. The revolving credit
facility included in the credit agreement, expires on June 30, 2008.
Selected
data on the Companys borrowings under its revolving credit facility is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
Average balance outstanding |
|
$ |
1,764,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,833,000 |
|
Maximum balance outstanding |
|
|
4,400,000 |
|
|
|
8,100,000 |
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
5.37 |
% |
6. Long-Term Debt:
Long-term obligations at June 30 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Term loan, principal
payments due on a
quarterly basis and
interest due in monthly
installments through June
2010; interest at the back
reference rate or LIBOR
plus a margin);
collateralized by
substantially all assets
of the Company other than
those pledged as
collateral on existing
lease or mortgage
obligations. |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swiss credit facility that
provides for a three-year
term loan at varying
rates. Borrowings under
the Swiss credit facility
are secured by all of the
equity interest held by
the Companys Swiss
subsidiary in Filsport.
The first advance on the
loan bears interest at
3.69%, the second advance
bears interest at 4.09%,
and the third and final
advance bears interest at
4.40%. |
|
|
3,654,300 |
|
|
|
2,419,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
50,810 |
|
|
|
22,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,705,110 |
|
|
|
5,741,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
(1,268,910 |
) |
|
|
(1,614,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,436,200 |
|
|
$ |
4,127,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
Under terms of the various loan agreements, the Company must meet certain financial covenants,
including maintaining certain levels of stockholders equity and meeting or exceeding certain
financial ratios. As of June 30, 2005, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants.
Future maturities due in each fiscal year with respect to long-term debt, excluding obligations
under capital leases, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
$ |
1,609,800 |
|
2007 |
|
|
1,809,800 |
|
2008 |
|
|
700,000 |
|
2009 |
|
|
800,000 |
|
2010 |
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,719,600 |
|
Leases
The Company has commitments under various operating and capital leases which bear interest at
various rates and are payable in monthly installments through various dates. Future minimum lease
payments under noncancelable operating and capital leases are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
Operating |
|
|
Leases |
|
Leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
$ |
5,472 |
|
|
$ |
441,096 |
|
2007 |
|
|
5,472 |
|
|
|
395,211 |
|
2008 |
|
|
5,472 |
|
|
|
349,653 |
|
2009 |
|
|
5,472 |
|
|
|
354,407 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1,824 |
|
|
|
1,572,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total future minimum lease payments |
|
|
23,712 |
|
|
$ |
3,112,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less amount representing interest |
|
|
(1,697 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum lease payments |
|
|
22,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(4,796 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term capital lease obligation |
|
$ |
17,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense under operating leases for fiscal 2005, 2004, and 2003 was $490,237, $398,466 and
$433,529, respectively.
7. Income Taxes:
Deferred income taxes represent the tax effects of timing differences in the recognition of
revenue and expenses for financial reporting and income tax purposes. Federal tax credits are
recorded as a reduction of income tax expense in the year the credits are utilized.
The following summarizes the components of income before taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
6,602,158 |
|
|
$ |
4,035,087 |
|
|
$ |
5,045,089 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
1,667,397 |
|
|
|
542,280 |
|
|
|
(788,693 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,269,555 |
|
|
$ |
4,577,367 |
|
|
$ |
4,256,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
The following summarizes the components of the provision for taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Currently
payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
2,293,758 |
|
|
$ |
2,227,768 |
|
|
$ |
1,591,112 |
|
State |
|
|
345,061 |
|
|
|
380,186 |
|
|
|
285,474 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
596,510 |
|
|
|
445,755 |
|
|
|
(473,513 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
72,671 |
|
|
|
(1,526,709 |
) |
|
|
(168,187 |
) |
Valuation Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
470,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,308,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,527,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,705,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of income tax computed at the U.S. statutory rate to the effective income tax
rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Statutory rate |
|
$ |
2,894,344 |
|
|
$ |
1,602,078 |
|
|
$ |
1,447,175 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
470,229 |
|
State taxes |
|
|
347,688 |
|
|
|
211,502 |
|
|
|
235,802 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
80,507 |
|
|
|
78,821 |
|
|
|
716,819 |
|
Resolution of tax issue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(433,635 |
) |
|
|
(1,210,000 |
) |
Change in rate on deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,899 |
|
Other |
|
|
(14,539 |
) |
|
|
68,234 |
|
|
|
(169,809 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,308,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,527,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,705,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company recognized a reduction in income tax expense
of $1.2 million due to the reversal of previously recorded tax contingencies. These contingencies
relate to potential U.S. taxation of certain international profits. Due to changes in facts and
circumstances, the Company no longer believes these tax contingencies
to be probable and has
therefore reversed the remaining reserve balance.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company recognized a reduction in income tax expense
of $434,000 as the result of the resolution of various outstanding tax issues, because the statute
for the tax year for which these tax contingencies applied to had passed.
The
Company adjusted the federal and state income tax rates used to
record its net deferred tax assets in fiscal 2005 based upon an
updated evaluation of the income tax benefits that will likely exist
when the net deferred tax assets are realized on future returns.
44
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income
tax purposes. Significant components of the Companys deferred income tax liabilities and assets
as of June 30, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Deferred tax
assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for uncollectible accounts |
|
$ |
5,258,588 |
|
|
$ |
5,178,809 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
552,467 |
|
|
|
193,144 |
|
Accruals and other reserves |
|
|
197,881 |
|
|
|
539,774 |
|
Net
operating losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,895 |
|
Other |
|
|
224,679 |
|
|
|
275,685 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(470,229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,233,615 |
|
|
$ |
5,911,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
$ |
(278,286 |
) |
|
$ |
(227,789 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
5,955,329 |
|
|
$ |
5,683,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realization of the future tax benefits related to the net deferred tax assets is dependent on many
factors, including the Companys ability to generate taxable income. During 2005, the Company
recorded a valuation allowance against outstanding European net operating loss carryforwards as
management no longer believes the tax benefits for these losses will be realized. Management
believes that, at a minimum, it is more likely than not that future taxable income will be
sufficient to realize the remaining net deferred tax asset.
8. Stockholders Equity:
Stock Options
The Company has 925,000 shares of its common stock reserved under its 1988 Restated Stock Option
Plan and 1,400,000 shares reserved under its 1998 Stock Incentive Plan for issuance to key
employees, consultants, or other persons providing valuable services to the Company. Options are
granted at prices not less than the fair market value on the date of grant and are exercisable in
cumulative installments over a term of five years. They expire seven to ten years after grant.
The Company also granted options to purchase a total of 650,000 shares of common stock to
executives outside these plans in 2002 as an inducement to their initial employment. These
non-plan options were also granted at prices equal to fair market value on the date of grant and
expire seven to ten years after grant.
45
The following table summarizes information with respect to options granted under and outside the
plans as of June 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
Balance outstanding at June 30, 2002 |
|
$ |
3.11 |
|
|
|
802,073 |
|
Granted |
|
|
3.63 |
|
|
|
1,247,000 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
2.82 |
|
|
|
(80,000 |
) |
Cancelled |
|
|
3.28 |
|
|
|
(189,073 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance outstanding at June 30, 2003 |
|
$ |
3.46 |
|
|
|
1,780,000 |
|
Granted |
|
|
7.27 |
|
|
|
510,998 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
2.95 |
|
|
|
(157,250 |
) |
Cancelled |
|
|
3.21 |
|
|
|
(115,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance outstanding at June 30, 2004 |
|
$ |
4.50 |
|
|
|
2,018,748 |
|
Granted |
|
|
4.75 |
|
|
|
210,500 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
2.82 |
|
|
|
(40,000 |
) |
Cancelled |
|
|
6.71 |
|
|
|
(60,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance outstanding at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
4.49 |
|
|
|
2,128,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
4.25 |
|
|
|
866,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for grant at June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options Outstanding |
|
|
Stock Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Range of |
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Shares |
|
|
Contractual Life |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per Share |
|
$ 2.25 to $ 2.94 |
|
|
133,000 |
|
|
2.3 Years |
|
$ |
2.52 |
|
|
|
104,250 |
|
|
$ |
2.55 |
|
$ 3.30 to $ 3.85 |
|
|
1,175,250 |
|
|
4.4 Years |
|
|
3.63 |
|
|
|
494,500 |
|
|
|
3.65 |
|
$ 3.87 to $ 5.92 |
|
|
479,500 |
|
|
6.7 Years |
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
|
181,750 |
|
|
|
4.52 |
|
$ 6.13 to $ 10.75 |
|
|
340,998 |
|
|
5.6 Years |
|
|
8.21 |
|
|
|
86,375 |
|
|
|
9.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,128,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
866,875 |
|
|
|
9.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the options reflected in the foregoing tables are options to purchase a total of 95,000
shares granted to three consultants during the year ended June 30, 2004, all of which are
exercisable to purchase common stock at a price equal to fair market value on the date of grant and
expire in five years.
Stock Purchase Plan
The Company has reserved 200,000 authorized shares of its common stock for issuance under its
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. All full-time employees are eligible to participate in the plan by
having amounts deducted from their earnings. After the issuance of shares under the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan with respect to the plan period ended June 30, 2005, there remained 48,880 shares
available for future issuance under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Restricted Stock Grants
On July 19, 2000, the Company issued 180,000 shares of restricted stock to certain key employees
under its 1998 Stock Incentive Plan. The restricted shares were issued at $2.50 per share, which
was the fair market value of the Companys stock on the date of grant. The effect of the
restricted stock grant is to increase the issued and outstanding shares of the Companys common
stock. Deferred compensation was recorded for the restricted stock grants on the date of grant and
was amortized over the restricted
46
stock vesting period. Restricted stock awarded may not be voluntarily or involuntarily sold,
assigned, transferred, pledged or encumbered during the restricted period. Of the restricted
shares, 25% vested immediately, and the remaining shares vested 25% per year over a four-year
period. During the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Company recognized $(15,937) and
$108,750, respectively, in selling, general and administrative expense associated with the
restricted stock grant. During fiscal 2004 and 2003, 7,500 and 37,500 shares, respectively, of
restricted stock were cancelled as the employees were terminated prior to the shares becoming fully
vested, causing a reversal of $18,750 and $93,750, respectively, of previously recorded expense
during the year.
On June 6, 2004, the Company issued 20,498 shares of restricted stock to certain key employees
under its 1998 Stock Incentive Plan. The restricted shares were issued at $6.13 per share, which
was the fair market value of the Companys stock on the date of the grant. These restricted shares
vest 33% per year over a three-year period. During the year ended June 30, 2005, the Company
recognized $72,041 in selling, general, and administrative expense associated with the restricted
stock grant. The Company records compensation expense for those fixed awards granted to
non-employees on a straight-line basis over the related vesting period.
9. Commitments and Contingencies:
Litigation
In late January 2001, the Company was served with documents in connection with a product liability
case brought in the California Superior Court for Solano County. Through various proceedings, the
original complaint in this case was dismissed, without prejudice to re-file. The plaintiff filed a
new complaint in the same count in the Fall of 2004 and the case is now proceeding to discovery.
From time to time, the Company has
also been a party to other claims, legal actions and complaints
arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe that the resolution
of such matters has had or will have a material impact on the Companys results of operations or
financial position.
Commitments
The Company has engaged several celebrities who have endorsed our consumer products to act as
the Companys spokespersons in promoting those products and have agreed to pay them for their
services in appearing in advertisements and for use of their names. The Company has contractual
commitments under these agreements totaling approximately $567,000 for the year ending June 30,
2006.
401(k) Plan
The Company has a 401(k) plan in which substantially all employees are eligible to participate.
Participants may contribute from 1% to 20% of eligible earnings to the plan. Company contributions
are 50% of the first 6% contributed by the employee. In addition, the Company may make additional
discretionary contributions to the plan as determined annually. The Company contributed $324,059,
$248,022 and $212,581 to the plan for the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
10. Segment Information:
Since July 1, 2004, Compex Technologies, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries have been reporting
in three reportable segments. The Company had previously reported as one operating segment which
included the manufacture and distribution of electrical stimulation products for pain management,
rehabilitation and fitness applications. However, given the establishment and growth of the
Companys consumer products segment, which includes electrical stimulation products for consumer
distribution, the Company has reorganized the
47
manner in which it reviews and manages its business. The Companys new reporting structure is
based on a geographical basis in segmenting its international and U.S. operations. Further
segmentation of the U.S. operations is based on product offering by separating its U.S. consumer
from its U.S. medical division. The Companys U.S. medical segment consists of electrical
stimulation products for rehabilitation, pain management and accessories and supplies distributed
to patients through healthcare providers. Consumers of our U.S. medical segment require a
physicians prescription to purchase or rent products, and the Company is normally reimbursed
through a third party reimbursement organization such as an insurance company, health maintenance
organization, or a governmental agency under Medicare, Medicaid, workers compensation or other
programs. The Companys U.S. consumer segment consists of the sale of electrical stimulation
products for consumers. Because the regulatory requirements and the markets differ substantially
from the regulatory requirements and markets in the United States, the Company sells a completely
different line of both medical, sport, fitness and wellness products over the counter under the
Compex name in Europe. There is no reporting distinction between medical and consumer products
within the Companys international reporting segment, because the European regulatory environment
does not necessitate the distinction between method of distribution of medical and consumer
products as is necessary in the U.S.
The Companys chief operating decision-makers make operating and strategic decisions based on
measures of segment profit that includes gross profit less selling and marketing expenses.
48
Revenue,
cost of sales and rentals, and selling expenses by division are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended June 30, 2003 |
|
|
|
U.S. Medical |
|
|
U.S. Consumer |
|
|
International |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
49,448,393 |
|
|
$ |
68,151 |
|
|
$ |
25,943,372 |
|
|
$ |
75,459,916 |
|
Cost of sales and rentals |
|
|
13,361,368 |
|
|
|
21,001 |
|
|
|
9,195,894 |
|
|
|
22,578,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
36,087,025 |
|
|
|
47,150 |
|
|
|
16,747,478 |
|
|
|
52,881,653 |
|
Percentage |
|
|
73.0 |
% |
|
|
69.2 |
% |
|
|
64.6 |
% |
|
|
70.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses |
|
|
21,286,640 |
|
|
|
791,682 |
|
|
|
7,890,682 |
|
|
|
29,969,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit |
|
$ |
14,800,385 |
|
|
$ |
(744,532 |
) |
|
$ |
8,856,796 |
|
|
$ |
22,912,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended June 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
U.S. Medical |
|
|
U.S. Consumer |
|
|
International |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
52,025,672 |
|
|
$ |
791,757 |
|
|
$ |
33,143,234 |
|
|
$ |
85,960,663 |
|
Cost of sales and rentals |
|
|
13,943,173 |
|
|
|
333,540 |
|
|
|
14,158,967 |
|
|
|
28,435,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
38,082,499 |
|
|
|
458,217 |
|
|
|
18,984,267 |
|
|
|
57,524,983 |
|
Percentage |
|
|
73.2 |
% |
|
|
57.9 |
% |
|
|
57.3 |
% |
|
|
66.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses |
|
|
22,541,852 |
|
|
|
3,805,755 |
|
|
|
9,415,693 |
|
|
|
35,763,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit |
|
$ |
15,540,647 |
|
|
$ |
(3,347,538 |
) |
|
$ |
9,568,574 |
|
|
$ |
21,761,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
U.S. Medical |
|
|
U.S. Consumer |
|
|
International |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
59,981,294 |
|
|
$ |
4,249,980 |
|
|
$ |
31,842,765 |
|
|
$ |
96,074,039 |
|
Cost of sales and rentals |
|
|
15,766,545 |
|
|
|
1,861,572 |
|
|
|
13,316,425 |
|
|
|
30,944,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
44,214,749 |
|
|
|
2,388,408 |
|
|
|
18,526,340 |
|
|
|
65,129,497 |
|
Percentage |
|
|
73.7 |
% |
|
|
56.2 |
% |
|
|
58.2 |
% |
|
|
67.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses |
|
|
25,259,199 |
|
|
|
6,788,389 |
|
|
|
9,500,968 |
|
|
|
41,548,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit |
|
$ |
18,955,550 |
|
|
$ |
(4,399,981 |
) |
|
$ |
9,025,372 |
|
|
$ |
23,580,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation
of segment profit to income from operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Total profit from segments |
|
$ |
22,912,649 |
|
|
$ |
21,761,683 |
|
|
$ |
23,580,941 |
|
Unallocated corporate expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
12,201,022 |
|
|
|
14,197,056 |
|
|
|
16,440,874 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
2,122,659 |
|
|
|
2,554,290 |
|
|
|
2,497,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
8,588,968 |
|
|
$ |
5,010,337 |
|
|
$ |
4,642,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
Net
revenues by product lines are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Rehabilitation products |
|
$ |
15,085,264 |
|
|
$ |
17,693,448 |
|
|
$ |
17,319,361 |
|
Pain management |
|
|
15,431,708 |
|
|
|
16,652,988 |
|
|
|
21,969,232 |
|
Consumer products |
|
|
19,364,142 |
|
|
|
26,116,237 |
|
|
|
28,971,600 |
|
Accessories and supplies |
|
|
25,578,802 |
|
|
|
25,497,990 |
|
|
|
27,813,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
75,459,916 |
|
|
$ |
85,960,663 |
|
|
$ |
96,074,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company does not have a single customer that accounts for more than 5% of consolidated revenue
for fiscal 2005 and 2004. During fiscal 2003 one customer accounted for approximately 10% of
consolidated revenue. No customer accounted for more than 5% of total receivables as of June 30,
2005 and 2004.
Assets by
segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Medical |
|
|
U.S. Consumer |
|
|
International |
|
|
Total |
|
Segment assets at June 30, 2004 |
|
$ |
25,771,895 |
|
|
$ |
2,972,642 |
|
|
$ |
14,621,634 |
|
|
$ |
43,366,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
37,857,601 |
|
|
$ |
2,113,933 |
|
|
$ |
14,350,201 |
|
|
$ |
54,321,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of segment assets to total assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
Assets from segments |
|
$ |
43,366,171 |
|
|
$ |
54,321,735 |
|
Unallocated corporate assets: |
|
|
32,843,225 |
|
|
|
34,996,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
76,209,396 |
|
|
$ |
89,318,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Quarterly Data (Unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended June 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
1st Quarter |
|
|
2nd Quarter |
|
|
3rd Quarter |
|
|
4th Quarter |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
19,156,266 |
|
|
$ |
22,464,599 |
|
|
$ |
21,651,597 |
|
|
$ |
22,688,201 |
|
|
$ |
85,960,663 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
12,719,020 |
|
|
|
15,304,092 |
|
|
|
14,571,045 |
|
|
|
14,930,826 |
|
|
|
57,524,983 |
|
Net Income |
|
|
354,157 |
|
|
|
1,228,583 |
|
|
|
428,735 |
|
|
|
1,038,892 |
|
|
|
3,050,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per
common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
50
Certain quarterly items have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
1st Quarter |
|
|
2nd Quarter |
|
|
3rd Quarter |
|
|
4th Quarter |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
21,653,738 |
|
|
$ |
25,212,350 |
|
|
$ |
22,902,107 |
|
|
$ |
26,305,844 |
|
|
$ |
96,074,039 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
14,739,120 |
|
|
|
16,744,916 |
|
|
|
15,049,144 |
|
|
|
18,596,317 |
|
|
|
65,129,497 |
|
Net Income |
|
|
228,723 |
|
|
|
1,028,323 |
|
|
|
17,926 |
|
|
|
1,276,309 |
|
|
|
2,551,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per
common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
51
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Compex Technologies, Inc.
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Report, that
Compex Technologies, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of June
30, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Compex
Technologies Inc.s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on
the effectiveness of the companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Compex Technologies, Inc. maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Compex Technologies, Inc. maintained,
in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2005,
based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Compex Technologies, Inc as of June 30,
2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity, and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2005 of Compex Technologies,
Inc. and our report dated September 12, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
September 12, 2005
52
Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure.
None
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting them to the material
information relating to us (or our consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the
reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Management conducted
an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the
framework in Internal Control -Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, our management concluded
that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2005 based on
criteria in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by COSO. Managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2005 has been audited by
Ernst & Young, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, and Ernst & Young, LLP has
issued an attestation report on managements assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting, which is included with its report on our financial
statements under Item 8 of this form 10K.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2005, there has been no change in our internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information.
Not applicable
53
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.
The information contained under the headings Proposal I: Election of Directors, Executive
Officers Who Are Not Directors, Information About Our Board Of Directors And Its Committees, And
Other Corporate Governance MattersAudit Committee and -Compliance with section 16(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of our definitive proxy statement for our annual meeting of
shareholders to be held November 17, 2005 (hereafter the Proxy Statement), is incorporated herein
by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information under the heading Executive Compensation and Performance Graph of the Proxy
Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters.
The information under the heading Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
of the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
Not applicable
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The information contained under the heading Relationship with Independent Accountants of the
Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 15.
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) 1. Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements required by this item are listed in the Index to
Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
2. Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts. This schedule should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements. All other schedules have been omitted because
they are not applicable or not required, or because the required information is included in
the financial statements or the notes thereto.
54
3. Exhibits
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,
2002 filed September 30, 2003 (File Number 0-9407)) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Articles of Merger changing the name of the Registrant to Compex
Technologies, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our
Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed March 14, 2003 (File No.
333-103817)) |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Restated Bylaws of Compex Technologies, Inc., as amended (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File Number 0-9407)) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
1988 Restated Stock Option Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,
2002 filed September 30, 2003 (File Number 0-9407)) |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4
to our Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed March 14, 2003 (File No.
333-103817)) |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Compex Technologies, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by
reference to Appendix E to the final prospectus included in Amendment No. 1
to the our Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed February 2, 1998 (file
no. 333-44139)) |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Rights Agreement dated as of February 17, 2003 between Compex Technologies,
Inc. and Registrar and Transfer Company (incorporated by reference to our
Form 8-A filed February 18, 2003 (File Number 0-9407)) |
|
|
|
+10.1
|
|
Form of Severance Pay Agreement (Incorporated by reference to our Form
10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 1997 (File Number 0-9407)) |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated June 2, 2004 between Compex
Technologies, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association. |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Security Agreement dated June 23, 2005 between Compex Technologies, Inc. and
U.S. Bank National Association. (Incorporated by reference to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 27, 2005 (File No. 0-9407) |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Stock Pledge Agreement dated July 19, 1999 between Rehabilicare Inc. and
U.S. Bank National Association covering all shares of capital stock in
Compex SA owned by Rehabilicare Inc. (Incorporated by reference to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 2, 1999 (File No. 0-9407)) |
|
|
|
+10.5
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of August 12, 2002 between Rehabilicare Inc.
and Dan Gladney (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2002 filed September 30,
2003) |
|
|
|
+10.6
|
|
Employment Agreement Amendment dated February 5, 2003 between Compex
Technologies, Inc. and Dan Gladney (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.11 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2003) |
|
|
|
+10.7
|
|
Non-Incentive Option Agreement dated August 12, 2003 between Compex
Technologies, Inc. and |
55
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Gladney (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.12 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2003) |
|
|
|
+10.8
|
|
Non-Incentive Option Agreement (with acceleration) dated August 12, 2003
between Compex Technologies, Inc. and Dan Gladney (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.13 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June
30, 2003) |
|
|
|
+10.9
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of December 2, 2002 between Rehabilicare Inc.
and Scott Youngstrom (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to our
Annual Report on Form 8-K filed May 18, 2005) |
|
|
|
+10.10
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated May 15, 2005 between Compex
Technologies, Inc. and Marshall Masko ( incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.15 to our Annual Report on Form 8-K filed May 18, 2005) |
|
|
|
+10.11
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of September 1, 2003 between Rehabilicare Inc.
and G. Michael Goodpaster (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004) |
|
|
|
+10.12
|
|
Form of Incentive Option Agreement granted to Scott Youngstrom, Marshall
Masko and G. Michael Goodpaster. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12
to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004) |
|
|
|
+10.13
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for restricted stock grants to Dan
Gladney, Scott Youngstrom, Marshall Masko, and G. Michael Goodpaster
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Amendment No. 2 dated as of June 23, 2005 to Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement between Compex Technologies, Inc. and U.S. Bank National
Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Annual Report
on Form 8-K filed June 27, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Term Note dated June 23, 2005 to U.S. Bank National Association
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Annual Report on Form 8-K
filed June 27, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Guarantee dated June 23, 2005 by SpectraBrace, Ltd. of Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Annual
Report on Form 8-K filed June 27, 2005) |
|
|
|
*10.17
|
|
Manufacturing Agreement dated May 24, 2005 between Compex Technologies, Inc.
and Bionicare, Inc. |
|
|
|
21
|
|
Subsidiaries (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21 to Rehabilicares
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2001 (File No.
0-9407)) |
|
|
|
*23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Ernst & Young LLP |
|
|
|
*31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 15d-14(a)(17 CFR
240.15d-14(a)) and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
*31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 15d-14(a)(17 CFR
240.15d-14(a)) and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
*32
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Furnished but not filed) |
|
|
|
+ |
|
Management compensatory plan or agreement |
|
* |
|
Filed with this Form 10-K |
56
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: September 13, 2005
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Dan W. Gladney |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dan W. Gladney |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
NAME |
|
TITLE |
|
DATE |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dan W. Gladney
Dan W. Gladney
|
|
Chairman, President, Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
September 13, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Scott P. Youngstrom
Scott P. Youngstrom
|
|
Vice President of Finance
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
|
|
September 13, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
September 13, 2005 |
Frederick H. Ayers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
September 13, 2005 |
Gary D. Blackford |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
September 13, 2005 |
Richard E. Jahnke |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
Paulita M. LaPlante |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
September 13, 2005 |
Richard J. Nigon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
September 13, 2005 |
Jack A. Smith |
|
|
|
|
57
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
Deductions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to |
|
|
allowance for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
beginning of |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Bad Debt |
|
|
credit |
|
|
doubtful |
|
|
Balance at |
|
Description |
|
period |
|
|
Reserve |
|
|
Reserve |
|
|
reserve |
|
|
accounts |
|
|
end of period |
|
|
|
|
Account Receivable Reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
17,665,865 |
|
|
$ |
18,976,772 |
|
|
$ |
3,947,890 |
|
|
$ |
17,429,425 |
|
|
$ |
3,910,937 |
|
|
$ |
19,250,165 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
15,200,590 |
|
|
|
15,051,933 |
|
|
|
4,067,765 |
|
|
|
13,659,597 |
|
|
|
2,994,826 |
|
|
|
17,665,865 |
|
June 30, 2003 |
|
|
12,891,864 |
|
|
|
12,219,742 |
|
|
|
5,772,354 |
|
|
|
11,851,052 |
|
|
|
3,826,318 |
|
|
|
15,200,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charges to |
|
|
Charged to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
beginning of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
inventory |
|
|
Balance at |
|
Description |
|
period |
|
|
Additions |
|
|
accounts |
|
|
reserve |
|
|
end of period |
|
Inventory Reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
941,331 |
|
|
$ |
997,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,285,131 |
|
|
$ |
654,080 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
838,413 |
|
|
|
527,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424,157 |
|
|
|
941,331 |
|
June 30, 2003 |
|
|
515,013 |
|
|
|
835,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
512,162 |
|
|
|
838,413 |
|
58